M“ TEE: HIG‘I‘E COURT OF JUDICI‘vf'URE I€£DHY& I?‘R£%,D1i$§1‘i J&B£LFU§Z ME I Writ petition Na. ywfjjgml~of 1999 Fetitiongrs: Biml Kumm uiab whlu. €a1‘ of r3. Gww. vPm g.C?ewC.L, awn, 38 yea“), Ly occupatlgn bus; emmw, rag; 5ent m: G§3j~§9§¢hh£u I “"Klr-zersie, District Reigsmh MA), Re$pon5.entsr,y\ (1) T? V white QF 1 ai’yu Pr¢u sh; throuc?~ Chip? 5M w‘y, Gavemnunt OL ash’a Eigwesh, Ef’soyml M. 13.. ”1’ u N :3 Kumar Fatal, *< Hume ister, Govt. of MQP. Bhopal MAJ. a/v lute Mahefxd‘r Smpm kaiely r 1::mf r35 Vinpoa Nmawl, Tab L1 err? incur“ malgqxny .vl.P‘. {<3 (3) :u’hri lulu?” i‘i‘aSiwxi District M tr “can Raigax‘i Eiswict RaigAVrh imp. ) n ‘ (4 Shir; Baburao; IFS.- the than Policw <‘uperint azié‘g ‘I RaigEr at priweat p9; ic ucu k wt (.r word, Dlahlci B‘mml MaPé a $ (5) Shri A. Sai Merobvrl IFS, guhwnivision l 0 flceuPohw)’ Kh&rssia, at pr‘esent a5:i rouge Superin‘temiextst, Buc?sl Iva? Shri $.D. Dubgyi Un er 5§ CT$trfYp Home Der artmwnt (W cation, Gavt . of LbApm}. Mu w w Shri Juxi, iti rwl Pvlicc Sur nntervderni‘, Pex Eh, Dlt‘hrlct Ran r'“ Nm E- (8) brl Nmlsr P: tavl (Las). the rhau Vf‘l \rilhmor, Reiga . Distrit‘t Pnic 1h, st preacm- ‘. Pollector, JcraelLur (Baa: r) IL 5x (7) “ ‘ 3 M 7 1 a Q m . i A~ 3 (2} k :3U 12cm Gam . ‘ on OE late x~xtmartln Gama s Navrnwrr, Tah‘ill vtrlci Rcicni it 9* (10) B91 R Wrr P “*“ €l San 53L 52ml Da$lmrcth Sinch pafel, resfdart og Gwswl PFTa. Kharsla’ “:h 1;. h alalu DiMmici: Raigarh Mulv‘. (11) Shri 536$?! ¢¥x9rawa1, } $013 of'Shri Ehgga€ram iAgI‘awel, GO emment Haswit 51,K.e..Pe5, Kharfsia, BiStIiC't Rsiga‘rh Phlv. ‘ V (12) 5:“: I sii 3h .Jwrawal, ”an or hate Hs§ 1w ACY‘sml, ’r/Lw Warm” Shmc Mewlco.” kha£51a, "‘ mu}. Khar3ia, Di strict Iiaigarh MaPa (l3) Shri DhanSE-i Ya§av, Cauncillor, Wars” Nm 2; LE‘CCI‘ Pd LChéVat; Kb££r i5: T h wavralc, 315th, Ram“ 51 MsP. (14) $‘nri vij 5y Kummr Eathare, w = sen cf lata Wrjee Létl Rethore, ‘ ‘ Cauncilior, We?“ 0.5, Nag‘ar Parlcimyat, Kharsia, Pureni Basti, Khar$i a, Disstrict Raigarh max—n. (15} Shri “autwar La}. Rakhore, Block Congrws Commi’t‘ceef Kharsi a, Pr€£i :3emt, x/i) ville, H$lahali, Tam knarSDia, Districi: Rai garh M.P. shri Ravinféra Kumar P \el, '3/0 ohri Dasi roth 1roh Patel, r/c) V111. Botaivc, i111. Kharslu, A uistr! t R lonxb JP‘ shri ’ukhiiec alngh Dansen£ baqmwr‘ a, Gram Panawvat Bargaurk‘, Trxbul Micxsie, DistuRaiqa—rka MaF. Ehri Ganesh Rai «acrawal, son 5f late Ra’t Eurmr Agraw—sl. r/o 1 Poac}, mwar J.a; Bistri t ‘Raxgurn Ind. t “ x 2 a hW§3€ mgh Th$§lft 5$3t@a&h msgaxx‘f §&eahy £0n$tabia No. 1359 ‘ mhwaai-‘Kumm. miw£1abie Nc‘g’Izz fl wguaws Wm ‘aangtabm m. 15.27 m. were: 9a$teéiiah Foiice i:izzaliiaiput a‘c tm' £azevazzt m ifs“- an £§.31.9§4 thmugh magi ,w mexai‘ ei’ yeliae gtation cf watti‘sgm. Réig‘yéi“ §§a N”%§ \%‘$‘ K W . U‘, g/yf ' 9y W A wi (3) WET? PETIG'TLQN UNLEEF, $335}. 226/227 CCN$T1TUTICN OF IND‘IR DETAILS gggggg‘y‘gy pmxgx mm §GH CGURT OF CHHAT'F‘wARH AT EgLAspUR Writ Petition No 498$ 0f 7999 PETHmNER RE$PGNDENTS State of Madhya radesh Chhattiegarh) & others. WRIT PETI‘HGNLLAIDER AR?§CLE 22EI227 OF 'E'HE CGNSTH’UTION OF INDSA Bivigion Sench: gresem Ns vharmxia singnax csunsei tar the petitionef ghr‘ V S Thakur, Depmy Adungaha Genemt far W: State Shri B D Guru counse: for respondeni (Passed on 13f“ day af August, 201 G} Per LM. Quddusi, J. Heard. 2. By way of this writ petition, the writ petitioner has prayed for the foi!owing feliefs: (i) ¥ The Hon'b5e High Court may be pieased to issue appropriate Wm or order that ihe action of the respondents r’n treating the petitioner under the Nationa! Securitv Act and causing harassment torture“ and numriratron to rum rs megai arbrtrarv maiaflde and habie to be condemned (ii) The Hon‘bie High Court may be pieased to direct the respondent State to initiate departmentai enquiry ‘against the respondents/Statema‘chinery for their iiiegai acts as narrated above done under the inftuence and pressure of the respondent No 2 the Home Minister-of punish them according to iaw and the State and to rules nan The Hon’bie High Court may be pleased to direct the reepondente to compensate the petitioner for his sufferings and torture at the hands or the respondent Bin at Kumar @ Bi , Ve‘reus (Now Hon‘bie shri t Ni. Quddusi & on’‘e r K. A arwa! $RAL {3RDER H ' NO a s P Hb $hr M Jd. in terms of money to be paid jointiy and severah‘y by the respondents and farther directing them to act in a just and proper manner and in ‘accardance with law whiie dealing w§th citézens. {M Aw otiwr order or direciion deemed just and proper in the cimumsiances of the case may aise be passed together with awarding of cost of these preceedings to be saddied against the respendents. 3. The detention order was passed on 31-12-19§8. Now the petitioner is not in detention and hence the prayer Ne. 1 has become infructuous. 4. Learned counsel appearing r‘or the petitioner has complained that at the time of death of the father of the petitioner, he was reteased for 24 hours but was handcuff. in fact, there was no order of state Government or order of the Advisory Boaw for, handcuffmg and it was on the respondent No. 3 who issued the order for handcuffing. He has aéso ciaimed for compensation of this matter‘ which is'to be enquired into by the State Government and the action is iiabie to be taken at the level of the State. 5. Therefore. without going into merits of the case one way or other, we dispose of this petition with a direction to the $tate that if the petitioner approaches the State‘oy way of filing representation. the same will be considered and appropriate action shalt be takent thereon as eariy as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of suoh representation. Kvr :71; 6. No order asto costs. FE‘_“ ,. It , Sd/— ' -V N.K. Agrawal > i I.M.Quddusi ; it ,‘ 1C Judge Judge :i