1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION W. NO.817/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NOS.351/1999, 352/1999, 353/1999 and 354/1999 (Decided) Bangad Ginning Factory, Nerparsopant ...Versus... Deputy Commissioner of Labour and others -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [S/Shri J.T. Gilda & C.V. Jagdale, Advs. for petitioner/applicant] [Smt. T.D. Khade, AGP for State] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 09.04.2009 Learned Counsel for applicant/petitioner state that the subject matter of the petitions was I.D.A. Reference that was made by appropriate Government and in fact order dated 17.8.1998 was put to challenge in these petitions. While disposing of these petitions on 3.12.2008 this Court did not mention about the said reference proceedings and that is why confusion has been created and writ of this Court shows direction to decide U.L.P. which was never the subject matter of the writ petitions. 2 I have gone through the application as well as the order disposing of the petitions so also the impugned order dated 17.8.1998 and I am satisfied that the statement made by learned Counsel for the applicant/petitioner is correct. In view of the above, I order that the matter mentioned in the order dated 3.12.2008 means I.D.A. Reference that was made by the appropriate Government under order dated 17.8.1998 and no other matter. Office to issue writ to the Labour Court accordingly. Labour Court is thereafter permitted to decide the said matter i.e. I.D.A. Reference within a period of two months from today. Civil Application stands disposed of. JUDGE ssw