IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.32113 OF 2008 1. UPENDRA KUMAR @ UPENDRA YADAV, SON OF RAMOTAR YADAV 2. RAMOTAR YADAV, SON OF LATE SUKAR YADAV BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ACHALPUR, POLICE STATION HISUA, DISTRICT NAWADA VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SANJAY KUMAR, SON OF SHIV KUMAR PRASAD YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ACHALPUR, POLICE STTION HISUA, DISTRICT NAWADA ********* 2 30/06/2011 The informant was aggrieved by the fact that by order dated 12.06.2004, the Court had taken cognizance for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 341, 109 and 308 of the Indian Penal Code. However, by the impugned order dated 30.06.2008, the Court while framing charges has only framed charges under Sections 307/149 of the Indian Penal Code. The power to add sections is always available to the Court if it comes to the conclusion on consideration of the evidence that charges are made out under the other sections. The charges can be changed according to the evidence led at any stage. I see no reason to interfere with the impugned order and as such, this application is dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )