IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 30TH OCTOBER 2009 / 8TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 30907 of 2009(G) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: 1. J.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, ASSISTANT (OPERATOR), TRIVANDRUM AIRPORT, RESIDING AT CHALAMOOLA PUTHENVEEDU, ARUKALICAL (WEST), VADEKEDATHUKAVU P.O., ADOOR. 2. S.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, ASSISTANT (OPERATOR), TRIVANDRUM AIRPORT, RESIDING AT ASWATHY, ERMALA VEEDU, KARICKAKAM, BEACH P.O., TRIVANDRUM. 3. K.C.GOPI, ASSISTANT (OPERATOR), TRIVANDRUM AIRPORT, RESIDING AT SHEELA NIVAS, PLANGA JUNCTION, KOLLAMVILAKAM, THIRUVALLAM P.O., TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. MR. THOMAS ABRAHAM MR. DIPU.R MS. MERCIAMMA MATHEW MR. K.S.HARIDAS MR. V.RENJITH KUMAR RESPONDENTS:- 1. AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, RAJIV GANDHI BHAVAN, SAFDARJUNG, NEW DELHI. 2. AIRPORT DIRECTOR, AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (AAI), TRIVANDRUM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, TRIVANDRUM. ADV. MR. K.L.NARASIMHAN, SC, TVM AIRPORT ATY FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ........................................... W.P.(C)NO.30907 OF 2009-G ............................................. Dated this the 30th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are Assistants (Operators) working at Trivandrum. According to the petitioners, their duty was confined to AC plant at the Trivandrum Airport. It is stated that when steps were taken by the authority to fill up the post of Junior Assistant, they approached this Court by filing W.P.(C)No.19579/2005. That writ petition was disposed of by Ext.P3 judgment directing that if they have any surviving grievance, the petitioners are free to submit representations before the authorities concerned. It is stated that subsequently they came to know that steps are being taken to remove them from the AC Plant and that thereupon they have filed Ext.P4 series of representations requesting for their retention in the AC Plant itself. These representations are pending and orders are awaited. It is at this stage that this writ petition. 2. I have heard the Standing Counsel for the respondent and in my view at least for the present, the : 2 : W.P.(C)NO.30907 OF 2009-G grievance of the petitioners will be redressed if the 2nd respondent considers and pass orders on Ext.P4 series of representations submitted by the petitioners. Therefore, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P4 series of representations with notice to the petitioners and pass orders thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment with notice to the petitioners. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE cl