IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22396 of 2011 Suresh Bind Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- For the petitioner—Samir Kumar singh For the State---- Murli Dhar APP 03 17.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. The petitioner is accused in connection with Sultanganj P.S.Case No. 217 of 2010 registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband of the informant who happens to be the brother of the deceased (Tarni Chauhan). While the informant did not disclose name of any culprit in the F.I.R but later on raised suspicion against co-accused Kailash Bind, who confess his involvement in alleged occurrence disclosing the name of the petitioner. It has also been submitted that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and the petitioner is in custody since 9.12.2010. Learned APP made submission that the petitioner was not named in the F.I.R but latter on co-accused Kailash 2 Bind was arrested on suspicion was raised by the informant and disclosed the name of the petitioner stating confessing a font` committing murder of the deceased and thereafter petitioner was also arrested and on the basis of his confessional statement, blood stains (blanket) and iron dab were recovered as detailed in paragraph 25 to 28 of the case diary. The F.I.R discloses that in the early morning on the date of occurrence deceased had gone to attend the nature of call in field where the dead body was lying. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation. I am not inclined to allowed the prayer of bail. Accordingly this bail application is dismissed at present. Namita ( Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)