IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH OCTOBER 2007 / 18TH ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 30118 of 2007(I) -------------------------------- PETITIONERS: ---------------- 1. JOHN NOBLE B.H., BUNGLOW PARAMBIL HOUSE, NEAR EARNAT TEMPLE, PALLURUTHY P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. ANSAR C.H., CHEVIDIKKAKATH HOUSE, NEAR JUMA MAZJID, KOYILANDY P.O., KOZHIKODE DIST. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.AJITH KUMAR SRI.P.VINODKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI SC FOR UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 30118 of 2007 -------------------------- Dated this the 9th October, 2007 J U D G M E N T Petitioners were students of B.Tech under the 1st respondent University. First petitioner has submitted Exhibits P5 and P6 for revaluation and scrutiny of answer papers. Similarly, the 2nd petitioner has submitted Exhibits P7 and P8 also for the same purpose. Thereafter, this writ petition has been filed complaining that unless expeditious orders are passed on these applications and the process of revaluation is completed early, that will affect their future career. I heard the learned Standing Counsel for the University. It is pointed out that examination was over very recently and that the University will take atleast six weeks time to complete the process of revaluation. Having regard to the fact that on account of the delay in declaring the results, serious prejudice is likely to be caused to the petitioners, I am inclined to direct an expeditious completion of the process pursuant to Exhibits P5 to P8. Accordingly, I dispose of this writ petition directing the respondents that the revaluation applied for by the petitioners shall be completed, as W.P ( C) No. 30118 of 2007 2 expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The scrutiny of the answer papers applied for by the petitioners shall also be completed in the meanwhile. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment before the respondents, for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No. 30118 of 2007 2 K.THANKAPPAN,J CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999 ORDER 25th May, 2007