IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8185 of 2008 NASEEM KAUSHAR @ RAJAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6. 05.01.2009 Prayer is made for adjournment again on the ground that the petitioner resides in the Middle-East for the purposes of his vocation and needs time to come to India. From the order sheet of the proceedings it is apparent that the petitioner had more than sufficient opportunity for the purpose. This Court is therefore not inclined to grant further indulgence. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State as also the learned Counsel for the complainant. The petitioner is the husband apprehending arrest in a Complaint case under Sections 498A and other provisions of the Penal Code. The submission on behalf of the complainant is for willingness to revive matrimonial harmony. In the facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner, above named, surrenders in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and prays for regular bail, notices shall be issued to the complainant through counsel representing her in the complaint case when the court below shall exercise its discretion in accordance with law keeping in mind the attitude and demeanor of the respective parties in the background of the submissions made on behalf of the complainant presently without being prejudiced by the present order. The petitioner shall be required to remain physically present in the Court on such dates till his application for bail is finally either allowed or rejected. The application stands disposed with the aforesaid observations. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)