IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1595 of 2009 Jai Narayan Singh son of Rajeshwar Singh, resident of Village- Jagdhar P.S. Palanwa, District-East Champaran. …..Petitioner. Versus State of Bihar. …Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 15.11.2011 The petitioner has preferred this revision application against the impugned order dated 11.08.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I at Motihari in Sessions Trial No. 100/2009 by which the petition dated 19.06.2009 by learned Sessions Judge F.T.C.-I under Section 228 Cr. P.C. has been rejected. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the allegation against the petitioner is to have assaulted the informant with Farsa on the leg and as such no offence under Section 307 I.P.C. is made out against the petitioner, Jai Narayan Singh. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application to raise his grievance before the learned Trial Court at the time of framing of charge. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of. Kamlesh (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)