: 1 : SD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2935 OF 1991 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2935 OF 1991 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2935 OF 1991 IN IN IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4404 OF 1989 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4404 OF 1989 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4404 OF 1989 IN IN IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1963 OF 1989 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1963 OF 1989 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1963 OF 1989 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.110 OF 1989 FIRST APPEAL NO.110 OF 1989 FIRST APPEAL NO.110 OF 1989 The State of Maharashtra, . Thru’ Collector of Sangli ...Applicant V/s. Bandopant Dattatray Tamhankar & Ors. ...Respondents Ms.S.P. Manchekar, AGP, for the Applicant. Mr.Gautam Kamble, Advocate, h/f. S.G. Deshmukh, for Respondent Nos.1 to 3, 5, and 4A to 4D. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATE : 28TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 28TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 28TH FEBRUARY, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned AGP for the applicant. 2. Some of the proposed legal representatives of respondent No.5 have been served. None appears for them. 3. In view of averments made in the Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within six weeks. : 2 : [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.]