IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3347 of 2005 SATYADEO PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 10 16.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties. Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that all admitted dues have already been paid to the petitioner in compliance of general order of this Court dated 16.07.2004 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 7569 of 2004 and other analogous cases and they also tender their unqualified apology for the delay in compliance of the said order. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that calculation chart has not been given, but learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that the said chart has already given by them to the petitioner along with letter no. 114 dated 23.08.2004, which is Annexure 2 to the M.J.C. petition itself. The other objection of learned counsel for the petitioner is that some amounts are still unpaid as petitioner’s pension has been calculated at a lower rate and he is also entitled for interest on the delayed payment of the retiral dues. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an application before the authorities concerned with regard to his remaining claim of dues along with relevant materials, including a copy of the earlier order of this Court as well as a copy of this order within four weeks from today. If such an application is filed within the - 2 - aforesaid time before the Executive Officer of the Revilganj Nagar Panchayat, Revilganj District Saran, he shall dispose it off by a speaking order in accordance with law within eight weeks thereafter and if any amount is found payable, the same should be paid to the petitioner immediately. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )