c^i ^' ^> BIlil IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) N0927^>OF 2010 (S.B.) PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ,^, ^/w c^y 1 ^/^^ ^y ^^'^' ^" <^' ^'' ' ^ M. S. Ansari S/o Jan^aluddin Ansari, aged about 53 years, Suspended Sub Engineer, R.E.S.^.Presently posted at Janpad Panchayat Konta, District Dantewada (C.G.). VERSUS 1. 2. '^•"" 3. y'\f"-" The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Zila Panchayat, South Bastar, Dantewada (C.G.), through its Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.). The Commissioner, Bastar Division Bastar (C.G.). 4. The Collector, District South Bastar ^?-' Dantewada (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ^^v INDIA ..-A.._^^_A...._^..... F ^n^r 'SFT fs^ieh ^8TT W^T^iqfi^T WHCIT «»*11<t» 7ST ^l^l<rl<4, ^tll-H^Ko, f®l<'11-H^< ...v.>..e.-..a^..M..:.^ 3TT^rT'<T=W ('ic<^<sl<^) 1TCTW ^f^a ^S^ SB:HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEPRtTINKSRD!WAKER 16.09.2010 SfariMalay Kumar Bha.dur} Smt. Smita Ghai, P.L. for tt ShnTasliwanfc Singii TI-ia^ CK^llenge in the present .15.4.2010 (Annexure P/3) pass< Executive officer, Jila PanchayatJ Shr Thakur submits that no authority to issue the- said si| that after issuance of the suspenj has already been initiated again< that at this stage, the order im.pj- to the compefenfc authority to accordance with law, In view of the consensu4i respondenfc No.2y categDrically passed without jurisdiction, th^ aside/ quashed. The resbQnded1 appropriate order in accordance <^i^F<n<fli T:rwif ^ fs^ <r»t<^i< ^3fRW3T?^T [, coijinsel fbr the peti.tion.er. tlie State/resps. 1,3 &4/ c|ar, counsel for respondexit N0.2. Iwrit petition is to the ord.er dated |d by the respondent N0.2 ~ Chief ISouth Bastar, Dantewada. |the respondent No.2 has absolutely tspension ord.er.. He ftirther.submits feion order, the deDarfcmental enauiry tt the peution.er. He iurth.er submits im.pjj.gn.ed can be qx.iashed givirig liberty jpass a fresh suspension order in statement made on behalf of the 3.d.mitting that the order has been said orcier dated 15.4.2010 is set Its would be at iiberfry to pass Ivith la^. • Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge