H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASP PETITIONER Contemot Case (Ct No. 186 of 20U9 R.P. Mishra S/o Shri Kati Prasad Mishra, aged about 68 years, R,/o 7/118 Press Colony Near Law College, Shahdo!, (?i4P) 484001 Versus RESPONDENT Shri Ram Yagya, Chtef General Manager, Telecom, Auto Exchange Building, Cnhattisgarh Telecwn Circle, Raipur (C.G.) (ContemDt Petitjon under Secfion 12 of the Contempt of Courts Aet read with Artf'cte 215 ofthe Constitufion of Indiai Apoearance: Mr. Vipin Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.M. Solapurkar, Advocate forthe respondent. ORAL QRDER (03.03.2010) SUN1L KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petttioner, in view of the deciston taken by therespondent and further in viewofthe factthat Rs.40,297/- only has now been paid to the petitloner, seeks permisslon to withdraw thlspetitton wlth liberty to fiie another wrlt petition as according to the petitioner some more amount should have been paid to the petitioner. Permission granted. Accordingly, Contempt Case (C) No. 186/2009 is dteposed ofas withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty grantedm favoyrqtthe petitioner. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ^ "\