1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2035 OF 1996 (Sugumal Thakurmal Sindhi Vs. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation and others) ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Heard advocate Mr. A.N. Sabnis h/f Mr. P.M. Shah, senior counsel for the petitioner. It appears that this court granted interim relief on the basis of the minutes of the order tendered by the parties. As per the said interim order, the petitioner was allowed to continue in possession of the suit premises until respondent No.2 Corporation calls fresh tenders for the stall in question. It appears that the interim order is passed by this court in the year 1991. Since none appears for respondent No.1, it can safely be gathered that the respondent No.2 might have called fresh tenders and must have taken subsequent 2 steps. In case, fresh tender is called, this petition has become infructuous and in case fresh tenders are not called out by the respondent No.2 Corporation after 10.3.1993 the possession of the petitioner continues in view of the interim order. In my opinion, viewed from any angle, further adjudication of this writ petition is not warranted. Hence, writ petition stands disposed of. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) Date:25.11.2010. rlj/