HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE JUSTIGE SHRI SATISHK. AGNIHOTRI &«< ^'ti—. 1] 21 31 Dinesh Kumar Netam, S/o. Gokul Ram Netam, Aged about 41 years, R/o. Village Kodejunga, Talisil Kokpur, District Kanker (CG) Mangau Ram Potai, S/o. Late Sudram Potai, Aged about41 years, R/0. Village Sidesar, Tahsil Kanker, District Kanker (CG) Ashok Ram Badhai, S/o. Late Savant Ram Badhai, Aged about 40 years, R/o. Village Potgaon, Tahsil aad District Kanker (CG) Rajendra Kumar Netam, S/o. Satte Ram Netam, Aged a'bout 38 years, R/o. Suravand, Post District Kanker (CG) Mahettar 5] Narayan Ram . Dhaneriya, S/o. Ram Dhaneria, Aged years, R/o. Village Potgaon, Tahsil & District Kankar (CG) 6] Narendra Kumar Rajak, S/o. Gend Ram Rajak, Aged about 40 years, R/o. Village Bande, Pbst Bande, Tahsil Pakhanjur, District Kanker , (CG) 7] Gangadhar Sharma, S/o. Leeladhar Sharma, Aged about 40 years, R/'o. Lodhipara, Kampa, Raipur, District Raipur(CG) Lavetre, S/o. K.R.Lavetre, Aged about 39 years, R/o. VUlage Jepra, Tahsil Charama, District Kanker (CG) Sv RESPONDENTS 2 9] Bnjlal, S/o. Bheekham Siagh, Aged about 42 years, R/o. Village Korar, DistrictKaiiker(CG) 10] Rajkumar Sinha, S/o. Girdhari Lal, Aged about 41 years, Ro. Village Korar, Tahsil Bhanypratappur, District Kan3cer(CG) 111 Gareeb Ram, S/o. Salik Ram, Aged about 42 years, R/o. Village Jepra, DistrictKanker(CG) 12] Maniram Patel, S/o. Durju, Aged about 45 years, R/p. Village Jepra, Tahsil Charama, District Kanker (CG) .VERSU8 : IJState of Chhattisgarh, Through: School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 2T District Education Officer, North Bastar, Kanker,District Kanker (CG) 3] Director, Public Education, Du-ectorate, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) u - 4] Collector, Kanker, District Kanker (CG) ^ WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjTION OF ESDIA Present: Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri VinayPaiidey, Panel Lawyer for the State/ - (Passed bu 13"* ofApril, 2007) 1. Leamed counsef^appearing for the petitioners submits fhat the petitioners were granted regular pay scale w.e.f. 29.11.2005, thereafter vide the impugned order dated 20.02.2007 passedbytlie "-\ District Education Qfficer, Kanker, District Kanker Nio.'^ff, 2/3TR5. f?r.^./2006-07/3032/^?^<:ira5 20.02.2007 (Annexiire P-8, 15, 16, 17, 18,19, 20 & 21), grant ofregular-pay scale were withdl'awn without anv rime and reasQn and without affording any opportunity ofhearing. 2. An identical issue was corisidered by this Court in fhe matter W.P. No. 2125 of2002 (Sant Kumar & Others Vs. Stete ofChhattisgarh & Others) which was allowed vide orderdated 18th January, 2006. Against the said order, tKe State Goverament pi-eferred a Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 17122/2006 (State of Chhattisgarh & Others Vs. Sant Kumar & Others) before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, which was also rejected on 09.10.2006. The leamed-counsel appearing for the respondent/State does not controvert tbe submission made by the petitioner. . 3. In view ofthe above, this petition is allowed in the terms oforder dated 18th Januar>' 2006 passedinW.P. No. 2125 of2002 (Sant Kumar & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others). No order as tocosts. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhash