THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 24455 of 2009 Oral order: The petitioner states that he is the owner of the land in question an extent of 87 Sq. yds. in Sy. No. 244/2B of Saripalli village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, having purchased the same under registered sale deed, and it is her grievance that the respondents are attempting to lay a road through the said land without issuing any notice and without paying any compensation. Hence, she seeks appropriate directions to the respondents. Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 filed separate counters. Respondent No.1 also produce a sketch of the area. The learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 submitted that the land which the petitioner is claiming to belong to her is a road, which passes along the muslim property on the southern side, and to show that, he relied on the sketch, a perusal of which indicates that there exists a muslim property, in front of which there passes a 10’ road. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner disputed the same and contended that it is the proposed road, and in fact, no road exists. The questions as to whether the land in question, belongs to the petitioner or is a 10’ road or is a proposed road, are disputed questions of fact, which cannot be decided by this Court in petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, and the remedy of the petitioner, if any, is to approach the competent civil Court and seek appropriate reliefs. Hence, with the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 11th August, 2010 KSR