i SB: Ho'n’bleMr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present; { Smt, Rent; Kosher, ’couhset for the petitioner. Shri Amn Sac, Govt. Advocate for2the State. ORAL ORDER ‘ (Passed on 10‘“ day of duty, zoos) ‘ With consent of teamed counsel appearino for both the parties the matter is heard fnalty 2) Learned counsei appearmg for the petttloner submxts that by the ‘ impugned order dated 2 22008 (Ahnexure Pit) the petitioner has .been ‘ reiieved for pining at Nawagarh According to teamed oounsei for the ‘ V ‘ petitioner the petitioner has threat to his tife in Nawagarh When he was ' , posted eariier in Nawagarn there were a tot of ditfcurtres ror the petitioner and ' he hao iodged a fret information report in the Police Station Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is willing to go to any piace Within the district Durg, except Nawagarh ‘3) r Having regard to the facts situation of the case particulariy the fact that x é V tnere as a threat to the life of the penhoner the State Gavernment 1s d‘rected to conSider his case for posting him at any place Within District Burg, except ,~ g \tawagarh Accordingly, the petitioner rs permitted to make a representation before the concerned authorities Within three days tn the event the representation is made the concerned authorities shall conSider and decide ‘ I the same, in accordance With taw and pass appropriate order Within a period of ‘ two weeks from the date of receipt'of'the representation. Hum-I cauR-r or: CHHTT:A-: LASU‘ ~ WritPetition (S) Ni: “182801' 2008 V .e - r- \ x , (Writ Petiticn under' Articie 226 of the Constitution of tndia) t a‘ J§ AsGmi BIPR Petitioner ' . ‘ 7 Praveen Kumar Mi<hra Sio Shn s K M‘shra ‘ arcupatmn Patwan, aged abent AA years RI’Q k A _ ' Devari Tah — Dc di‘ Lohara, District Durg. E ‘ u (CG). ‘ i \Versus Resgondents ‘1) State of Chhatt‘sgarh thmugh $ecretary, Deptt , l of Revenu Manrraiay, DKS Bhawan Rapur W ‘ 1 _ f (CG) _ 2) ‘Addltxonal Cnmmssmner through Commiss‘oner / Land recard Chhamcgarh Ralpur (CG) ‘3)V CoHector Durg, Dist Durg (CG) 4‘; S‘D.O.DondILohara(CG Dist Durg(CG). W 4) L ShriArun Sag learned Govt Advocate appearsr’gforthe Staie submlts that xf the representatmn is made the same shah be conSIdered and decided by the) concerned authority m accordance wsth 3a on Its own ments wxthm a penod of two weeks from the date of receipt or thle representattcn t k 5i) i in View of the foregoing, nothing suwives‘in the matter Mr Sao further euhmits that no coercive steps shau be taken tm the disposai of the representation L 1 i i . ’ E 5y ' AWOrdmQW, the petition is disposed Of. No order as to costs. . . f///f ‘ } \ _ ‘i Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotn i Judge ‘ : , i ‘