Civil Revision No. 1075 of 2010 -1- *** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1075 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.2.2010 Vimal Kumar alias Bimal Chand Gupta and others ....Petitioner Versus Satish Chand and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the petitioner S. D. ANAND, J. Civil Misc. No4695-CII of 2010 Allowed as prayed for. Annexure P-3 is taken on record. Civil Revision No.1075 of 2010 It is apparent from the material obtaining on the file including the impugned order itself and is, even otherwise, not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the controversy about the payment of Court fee went up to the Apex Court which (the Apex Court) declined the S.L.P. on 5.12.2008 and extended the “time granted by the Trial Court to deposit the amount of court fee ------- by two months from today”. It is no longer in controversy that the period granted by the Apex Court for deposit of the Court fee by the Apex Court is also over. The plea raised on behalf of the petitioners for further Civil Revision No. 1075 of 2010 -2- *** indulgence, by grant of time for deposit of the court fee, is misconceived in view of the fact that the final word on the subject was held by the Apex Court by disposing of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 18186 of 2008. With the period of extension granted by the Apex Court being over, there is no warrant for competence of a similar request before this Court. In the light of facts noticed above, the plea raised on behalf of the petitioner is denuded of merit and is ordered to be dismissed. February 23, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE