IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. 47724-M of 2007 DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 7, 2008 RAJ KUMAR ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Parveen Gaur, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Narender Sura, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Ram Chander, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) The issue raised in this petition under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, is with regard to the release of a Motor Cycle. While petitioner-Raj Kumar (husband) claims the Motor Cycle to be owned by him on account of the Registration Certificate, the contention of respondent No.2-Reena (wife) is that the payment for the Motor Cycle was made by her father; namely, Khazan Chand. The issue has been dealt with in para-6 of the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge i.e. the revisional court. The following needs to be noticed:- “6. It is not disputed that the marriage of the parties was solemnized on 21.2.2007. It is also not disputed that motorcycle was purchased on 16.2.2007. Learned counsel for Criminal Misc. 47724-M of 2007 2 the petitioner has placed on record photocopy of cheque dated 10.2.2007 in the sum of Rs.50,000/- from the account of father of the petitioner in Oriental Bank of Commerce Thanesar showing that the amount was withdrawn for purchase of motorcycle by the father of the petitioner. Copy of statement of account has also been placed on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also placed copy of cash memo of the motorcycle purchased on 16.2.2007 from Khanna Automobiles, Ladwa in the sum of Rs.35,400/-. The bill has been made in the name of Raj Kumar respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of the court towards signatures of Khazan Chand father of petitioner under the customer's signature showing that he had purchased the motorcycle in the name of Raj Kumar respondent. To tally the signatures on said cash memo, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention towards signatures of Khazan Chand father of petitioner on the cheque dated 10.2.2007. Two photographs have also been placed on record by counsel for the petitioner showing that at the time of marriage the keys of the motorcycle were handed over to Raj Kumar respondent. It is not disputed that registration certificate stands in the name of respondent, but copy of cash memo shows that it was purchased by Khazan Chand father of petitioner in the name of Raj Kumar as it was to be handed over to him at the time of marriage. .....” Having regard to the findings recorded on the basis of material available on record, no interference in exercise of powers under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, is called for. The petition is dismissed. August 7, 2008 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE