CR No.6335 of 2006 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CR No.6335 of 2006 Date of decision March 20, 2009 Ranjit Singh ....... Petitioner Versus National Insurance Co. Ltd. And others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R. C. Kapoor, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The revision is against an application which was dismissed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal against an order refusing to set aside an ex-parte order. There is a remedy in appeal and no revision lies. The revision petitioner has in fact assailed award passed by the Tribunal in his grounds of revision. The appeal could be filed only by respondent who had suffered an award only if half of the amount under award or Rs.25,000/- which ever is less is to be deposited. Revision cannot be filed and it will be open for the respondent to treat this revision as appeal if he deposits Rs.25,000/-. 2. The petitioner will have time of ten days from CR No.6335 of 2006 2 today to take appropriate steps for treating the revision as an appeal on deposit as required by law. If he fails to take steps as directed, the revision shall stand dismissed and remedy available to him for such conversion will likewise lost. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 20, 2009 archana