lt. IN THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.1 WRTT PETmON N0. /^/ " /2005 PETITIONER o.^r- , ^^^ .-z^^ .y - rf\.*' ,.^^ '^•••<^ <^ yv RESPONDENTS VERSUS ^l. Bharosa Panka, S/o. Bhaiyalal Panka, aged aboyt 55 years, at present working as Kotwar, R/o- Village- Pandri, Tehsil Marwahi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary. Deptt. of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6-). The Coltector, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) The Sub Divisional Officer, Pendra Road, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA. ,^t„^o^ RARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS: XI-HC-22 sn^rqiT R-li°b3Il^?T s(i*<Icti ^ifStr Stl*<lctl 'S!sf -<)i<i]dq, arny'is, Rtcii'yy ?i ^acfi mq^irgiw^J^:f\ MP.;.t.7.<2 SAC>&1 fSK——:-v-—l-~"'/-^ 200 3n^?T s^giw Hft3' 3349/21t)05 Shri F.S. Khare, counsei foi] Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, copy. Heard on I.A. No. hearing. The matter is taken up on| I.A. No. 3349/2005 for urgejit Also heard on !.A. No. 3|3! exemption from filing typed copy of The application is ailowed. The petitioner is exemptedl documents. Learned counsel Tor the p^ filed an appllcation under Sect| Revenue Code which is pending been decided by respondent No. order dated 08.04.2005 passed ii\ the petitioner. F|anel Lawyer for the State on advance learned counsei for the petitioner, persori like petitioner of the afores^id This prayer made by 'ieai opposed by learned counsel for th< Having considered and wf merits of the case, in the opinioji served if a direction is given to res 'shi<<I<n<l1f iwCTTff)SS(^t<Ri«i< ^aif^iTW^T p05, which is an apptication for urgent ioard. hearing stands disposed of. P50/200S, which is an application for the annexed documents. from fiiing typed copy of the annexed ^titioner submits that the petitioner has |on 57 (2) of the Chhattisgarh Land |since long back and the same has not 1-Sub Divlsional Officer. He refers to the W.P. No. 1375/2005 (Param La!-vs- lys for similar order, as according to the present petitioner Is similarly placed ^id writ petition. jned counsel for the petitioner is not State appearing on advance copy. (thout expressing any opinion on the of this Court, ends of justice will be jpondent No. 3 to declde the application XI-HC-22 T5? •<ii<<i<n<<, OTd^'is, fsiciioy 3ll^i4S<qi ^':P,.y.o;.HSS/^o^, anira? ••'••"•"—••••"••y--^ 200 SII^TEBT R-fi'sfcail^T Sbtfi'* flfStT sbtfl'* ^1 3:n^?T S^BTW fffer --2. under Section 57 (2) of the Chhatfl petitioner in accordance with law positively within three months fronji of this order. It is made clear petitioner may avail the remedy av( With the aforesaid observEJi There shali be no order as to costsl. psgarh Land Revenue Code filed by the |on its own merits as eariy as possible the date of receipt/production of copy tl|iat if any grievance stiil remains, the feilable under the law. ^tions, this petition stands disposed of. '=i)]<<Ici<fl-i *<iiciTffte^t'<Ri'K]< ^73lf^IT3TI^T Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge