Bail Appln. No.1 of 2008 i Case No .......................................... I Order (s) with signature (s) PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. P. SUBBA, JUDGE The order dated 6th January, 2009 passed earlier shows this petition as disposed of. It, however, appears that t:he observation regarding disposal of the matt:er crept into the order through inadvertence. Accordingly, t:he part of the order which shows t:hat this matter has been disposed is hereby recalled. Heard further arguments. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners in the course of his further submission stated that t:he petitioners herein apprehends arrest in connection with the FIR bearing No.RC-22/2008 of the Sikkim Vigilance Police which is more or less similar in content as in Bail Appln. No.5 of 2009 - Kunwar Onkar Singh vs. State of Sikkim. It is submitted by the learned senior counsel that vide order passed today in t:he above-mentioned Bail Application the petitioner Kunwar Onkar Singh has been granted anticipatory bail wit:h certain conditions. Since the facts and law applicable in the present case are similar, the learned counsel prays that the petitioners herein may also be granted anticipatory bail with similar conditions. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor raises no serious objection to such prayer made by the learned counsel for the petition.ers. Considered. Since facts in this case are identical and the law applicable to the case is same, I find substance in the submission of the learned counsel for t:he petitioners and as such, I am of the view that similar order is called for. Accordingly, this bail application is disposed of with the following order:- (i) The petitioners shall be released on bail in the t of his arrest b the CaseNo......P.9.i.I..£P.P.!.I.:..N.9:.|„.9.f2008 Order(s)withsignature(s) authority in connect:ion with RC-22/2008 of the Sikkim Vigilance Police on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakhs) only each with one reliable surety of t:he like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. (ii) The petitioners shall not make any threat or inducement to any person or persons acquainted with the facts of the case so as t:o dissuade them from disclosing it either to the police or t:o the Court. They shall not maintain any contact with any employees working in the SDL and interact with them until the investigation is over. (iii) They shall make themselves available t:o the I.0. at the Vigilance Police Station, Gangtok for interrogat:ion as and when required by the I.0. (iv) They shall not leave t:he country without the previous permission of the Court until the investigation is completed. (v) This order shall remain operative for a period of one month from the dat:e of this Order, In the meantime, the petitioners may approach the competent Court for regular bail, if so advised. JLJdge 15-04-2009