COCP No. 2121 of 2010 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 2121 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.11.2010 Gurbax Kaur .....Petitioner Versus Iqbal Singh Sandhu and Anr. ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Ms. Amandeep Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioner is that the order of the stay of proceedings before the Sub Divisional Magistrate-cum-Assistant Collector, Nakodar, passed by the learned Financial Commissioner, has not been implemented and the Sub Divisional Magistrate, has proceeded to decide the mutation on 1.9.2010. A perusal of the record shows that the learned Financial Commissioner has issued the notice of the application for transfer of the proceedings for 5.10.2010 and in the meantime, stayed the proceedings in respect of mutation No. 9477 of village Mehtabpur, Tehsil Nakodar. COCP No. 2121 of 2010 (2) Though learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that the petitioner has communicated the said order to the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, but there is no proof of the said fact. It is said to be inferred for the reason that the petitioner was presented before the Sub Divisional Magistrate. Be that as it may, the fact remains that on 5.10.2010, the transfer petition was withdrawn. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Since the transfer petition itself has been withdrawn, I do not find any justified cause to initiate the contempt proceedings. The petitioner has a remedy to challenge the order passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, in appropriate proceedings. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. [ HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 12-11-2010 ds