..^'-- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. Appellants Claimants Respondents Non-claimants Misc. Appeal (Cl No. 506 of 2010 1. Ku. Kavita Nayak, d/o late Ramesh Nayak, aged about 8 years, occupation student 2. Anil Kumar Nayak, s/o late Ramesh Nayak, aged about 4 years, 3. Yashwant Kumar Nayak, s/o late Ramesh Nayak, aged about 1 month 4. Smt. Rajmat Nayak, w/o late Ramesh Nayak, aged about 28 years, occupation Housewife (appellant No.1 to 3 being minor on behalf of through their legal guardian mother Smt. Rajmat Nayak appellant No.4) All r/o. village Fingeshwar, police station Fingeshwar, district Raipur C.G. VERSUS 1 Shyamsundar Pandey, s/o Rajnarayan Pandey, aged about 50 years, r/o Staydar Plastic, Ring Road No.1, Bhathagaon, Ring Road Chowk, Raipur, district Raipur C.G. (Driver of vehicle Truck bearing registration No.C.G.04/ZC/2691) 2 Rajendra Kumar Pandey, s/o Shyamsundar Pandey, through r/o Staydar Plastic, Ring Road No.1, Bhathagaon, Ring Road Chowk, Raipur, district Raipur C.G. (Registered owner of vehicle Truck bearing registration No.C.G. 04/ZC/2691) MACNo. 506 of 2010 r 3 The National Insurance Company Limited, through Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Mobil Mahal, Second Floor, G.E. Road, Raipur, tahsil & district Raipur C.G. (Insurer of vehicle Truck bearing registration No.C.G.04/ZC/2691) Memo of appeal under Section 1 73 of Motor Vehicle Act Present: None for the appellants. Shri Dashrath Gupta, counsel for respondent No.3. ORDER nimmi . ith (09mSeptember,2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellants. 2) As there is no representat'on on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The^ppieal, thereforejs_diamissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- R.N.Chandrakar Judge