IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 14TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 23RD KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 33594 of 2008(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- K. UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O. KUNJU, AGED 44 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.12, SHIVAJI STREET, VOC NAGAR, PAMMAL, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY SMT.A.PREMAKUMARI RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, OFFICE OF THE RESURVET SUPERINTENDENT, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, ENADIMANGALAM, ADOOR TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. SUDHA DEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.33594 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 14th November, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner claims to have purchased 10 cents of property under Exhibit P1 in the year 1993. Since the petitioner is an absentee landlord, he having been stationed at Chennai in connection with his employment, it seems that there is default on the part of the petitioner in remitting basic tax. He submits that he wanted to do so but the 2nd respondent did not accept the basic tax on the ground that that there is difference in the survey number noted in Exhibit P1 title deed and the survey records. Petitioner, therefore submitted Exhibit P5 representation before the 1st respondent requesting for conducting a resurvey and correction of an error, detected in that behalf. 2. Having heard the learned Government Pleader also, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider Exhibit P5 and take suitable action W.P ( C) No.33594 of 2008 2 thereon, within three months form the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with copy of writ petition before the 1st respondent for compliance. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.33594 of 2008 3 W.P ( C) No.33594 of 2008 4