IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.8103 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.01.2011 Rajpal . . .Petitioner Versus Balhara Singh and others . . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.S.S. Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This revision petition is filed at the instance of Rajpal, who is alleged to be respondent No.2 in the ejectment petition. Admittedly, the ejectment petition filed by respondents No.2 and 3 has been allowed by both the Courts below and it has been held that the question of ownership of the demised premises cannot be decided by the Rent Controller in the summary procedure as a Civil Suit is already pending between the petitioner herein and respondents No.2 and 3. In view thereof, I do not find any merit in the present revision petition and as such the same is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) January 19, 2011 JUDGE vivek