THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12461 of 2011 Dated 27th April, 2011 Between: Manne Konda Reddy …Petitioner And The Special Collector, Galeru Nagari, Srujana Sravanthi Project at Kadapa and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri P.Veera Reddy Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: AGP for Land Acquisition The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in considering the petitioner’s claim for share in compensation in the structures bearing Nos.100, 105(1), 105(2), 105(3), 111, 120, 121, 122, 132 and 133 in Survey Nos.99/2, 98/1B and 14/1 of Boddicherla Village, Gopavaram Mandal, YSR District. At the hearing, Sri P.Veera Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that even though the petitioner is not the registered owner of the structures, as he has share in the properties, which were acquired, he has filed claim petitions before respondent No.2 in the award enquiry. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner apprehends that respondent No.2 may not consider the petitioner’s claim petition and pass an award. In my opinion, when claim petitions are filed, respondent No.2 is bound to consider such petitions filed by the persons interested in the property. The petitioner failed to show any basis for his apprehension that respondent No.2 may not consider his claim petition. In the event of an award being passed by respondent No.2, whereby the petitioner feels aggrieved, he has to work out his remedies in accordance with Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.15168 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 27th April, 2011 VGB