THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR WRIT PETITION No.1908 2004 September 15, 2011 Between: State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad And another .. Petitioners And Muvva Rama Rao, Senior Assistant, Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Vizianagaram And others …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR WRIT PETITION No.1908 of 2004 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) The writ petition is filed by the State and the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (CCT), Hyderabad against the order dated 08.11.2002 in O.A.No.2939 of 1993. By order dated 10.6.1993, the second petitioner transferred the fifth respondent, who was working as Senior Assistant in the office of CCT, Vizianagaram, to the office of CCT, Hyderabad. The respondents 1 to 4 herein assailed the same in the O.A. By the impugned order, the learned Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal set aside the order dated 10.6.1993 directing the CCT, Hyderabad to post fifth respondent in the original place. It is brought to our notice that fifth respondent filed the writ petition being W.P.No.2043 of 2003, and having regard to the fact that the first respondent who is also competing for the post of Senior Assistant in the office of CCT, Hyderabad, retired, we disposed of the said writ petition on 18.8.2011 in the following manner. The writ petition is filed against the order dated 08.11.2002 in O.A.No.2939 of 1993 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, whereby and whereunder the learned Tribunal set aside the proceedings of the second respondent dated 10.06.1993 transferring the petitioner as Senior Assistant in the Office of the Commissioner, Commercial Taxes. This Court while admitting the writ petition on 12.02.2004 suspended the order of the learned Tribunal. By that time, the petitioner was relieved as UDC in the Office of the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Srikakulam, and she joined in the Office of the second respondent. It is now brought to the notice of this Court that the third respondent has retired. In view of the above, we dispose of the writ petition observing that as the petitioner’s transfer from the Office of the second respondent has been given effect to, and she has already been promoted as Assistant Commercial Tax officer vide proceedings No.C1/557/99-3, dated 24.05.1999, she may be continued there. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly without any order as to costs. In view of the above order and also having regard to the fact that the first respondent already retired, it is not necessary to go into the question raised in this writ petition. The writ petition shall stand disposed of, accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ (V.V.S. RAO, J) ___________________ (K.G.SHANKAR, J) September 15, 2011 YS