IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 23317 of 2011 Chintu Rajak, S/o Late Jamuna Rajak. Versus The State Of Bihar ------------------- 03. 14.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 Arms Act. Considering that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently the only material that has transpired against him is the confessional statement of the co-accused, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail after framing of charge without bifurcation of his case on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 285 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the mother/brother of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in 2 the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)