prtr1:"'^. C, ^' -• •~^ •'..L"',^ f- ••.••••• ^•t •'•" ?!T} ^ ^ 7^r\ o^- / IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETTTION (S) N077"-^/2009 PETHTONER RESPONDENTS ...••€/-'.••' ^^ -^y VERSUS -1. :"'^ <SP -c. :' '^ ^''''^ .••"'' '^:-'" 2. 3. Lambodar 6iri Soswami, aged about 52 years, Son of Shri Chandrasen Giri fioswami, Lower Division Teacher", 6ovt. Primary School - Chingaripali, Block - Sarangarh, Tahsil- Sarangarh, Distt- Raigarh (C.6.) The State of Chhattisgarh, Through- The Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) The Oistrict Education Officer, District - Raigarh (C.6.) The Block Education Officer. Block- Sarangarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) WRTT PETTTION \J/A - 2Z6 OF THE CONSTTTUTrON OF INNA p- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICS PRITISKER DIWAKES W.?.(S', SO. 4728/2009 Lainbodar Giri Goswami State ot' C.G. 8s Others WRIT PBTITION CSDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITOTIOM OF Shri Roop Naik, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. SunitaJain, P.L. for the State. ORAL-ORDER (26.08.2009) With the consent of the counsei for the parties, the matter is heard finally. By way of this petition the petitioner is seeking reguiar pay scale on the post of Assistant T'eacher. Counsel for the petitioner submits that number of identicai petitions have been decided by this Court and the issue involved is a conciuded one. He has also referred to one ol the orders in W.P.(S) No. 813/2007 (Ram Kumar Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh) in which regLllar pay scale was granted from the date of initial appointment. Counsel for the State submits that at this stage he can not make any statement before this Court as to whether case of the petitioner is covered with the order passed in aibrementioned writ petition. However, he submits that it' the petitioner makes a representation to the concemed respondent, the same shali be decided after scrutinizing the factual and legal position. Thus, it is directed that if the petitioner makes a representation to the authorities concemed within a penod of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same shali be decided within a i'urther period of one month from the date of its receipt. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed oi'. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge