IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1855 of 2011 SAVITRI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 22.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and in course of investigation, it came to light that the deceased had illicit relationship with the petitioner and furthermore, it came to light that on the date of alleged occurrence, the petitioner had called the deceased at her home and after that, the deceased was found missing. Admittedly, none of the person has seen going the deceased to the house of the petitioner nor any witness has claimed to have seen the actual killing of the deceased. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Savitri Devi be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 143 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Sri L.K. Mishra, J.M. Ist Class, Samastipur. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)