•af' HIQJICOURT OF CHHArrSSQASH: BiLASPUR Petitioner Hriday Ram Mandavi, S/o. Shri Phoo! Singh Mandavi, age about 37 years, Asstt/ Teacher, Go'4. Middle Schooi, katagson, Block Makdl, Distt. Bastar(CG). . , . Resppnaents , 1) State Govt. of ChhaStisgarh through Seeretary, Education & Tribat DeparEmenf, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Weifare Department, Distt. Bastar (GG$. 3) Btocic Education Officer, Biock Makdi, Distt. Bastar(GG). . 4) Treasury, Aocount and pension, Distt - Bastar (Writ Petitionunder Article 226 of the Constitution ofindia) S8: Hon'bte Mr. Satlsii K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Somkant Verma, counse! for the petstloner. Shri Y.S. Thatajr, Dy. Advocate Genera! fortheState. >8l .il1: VVith consent of learned counsei appearina for both the parties, the matter is heard finatly. 2) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner as weli as iearned counsel appearing for the respondents/'State joihtly submit that the facts and question of lav/, involved in the presentwrit petition, are the same asto that of ih Yashwant Xumar Bharadwaj Vs. Wiunicipai Corporation, Durg and another {20SS (!i) WP-^R •CQ 98}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 3-4-2006 and the order dateci 7-2-2007 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 697 of 2007 (A.N.V. Satyanar^yan and others Vs. State ofChhattisgarhand otters). u!_l_l- -;<2-- 3) Accordingly, ttie writ petltion is allowed in tenns of the order passed in the case of Yashwani Kuniar'Bhardadwaj (supra).and. A.N.V. Satyanarayan (Supra), subjeot to verification of the fact asto whether the petitioner has acqujred s.Ed/D.Ed/B.T.i./M.Ed. Examinaiion CertEBcate on hte own expenses, as.per the oireulars dated 'i3-9-1974, 24-12-1998, and 1-3-1939 and further whetner he nas been paid two advance.increments or not. No order as to oosi&_ Raju Sd/- , Satish K.Agnihotn Judge