C.R. No. 2930 of 2009 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 2930 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 14, 2009 Janki Parshad …..Petitioner Vs. Gram Panchayat, Village Jasawas and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Rupam K. Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.1. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Claiming to be in cultivating possession of the land in dispute, the plaintiff- petitioner had filed a suit for declaration and injunction. The trial Court, considering the petitioner to be in possession on the basis of the old revenue record, granted interim injunction, to the plaintiff- petitioner. The lower Appellate Court has reversed the said order forming prima facie C.R. No. 2930 of 2009 [2] an opinion that the plaintiff- petitioner is not in actual physical possession of the property in dispute rather the property in dispute is land which is given on lease by the Gram Panchayat to the lessees. It has to be determined on the basis of the revenue entries and on the basis of other evidence as to who is in actual physical possession of the property and whether the plaintiff- petitioner has got a right of ownership to the property in dispute. It has been brought to my notice that the case before the trial Court is fixed for recording of the evidence of the plaintiff- petitioner. The plaintiff- petitioner wants to lead documentary and oral evidence for which he seeks only two months time to produce the entire evidence in two opportunities. Without entering into the controversy regarding actual physical possession, it is deemed appropriate in the interest of justice to dispose of this revision petition with a direction that the trial Court will decide the main suit within a period of six months after the next date of hearing. Status quo regarding the possession as existing today will be maintained for a period of six months henceforth. Disposed of. October 14, 2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE