" ir IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASFUR 0 O 3 (CHHATISGARH) W.P.^^ OF 2003 PETITIONER Municipal Corporation Bilaspur through its Commissioner, Municipal Bilaspur,Distt. BBaspur- [CG] VERSUS 1. Presiding Officer underI.D. Act, Labour Court, Bilaspur [Chhattisgarh] J2. Rajesh Prasad Soni, S/o " ^Punni ^.tt.1 Soni^/o N^a Sarkanda, Jabdapara, Oppt. Kshatri Chhatrawas, Gali No.2, BUaspur, TahsU & District Bila^ur [C.i WRIT PETrTION UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRTT IN NATURE OF CERTI01RARI, MANDAMUS PROHJBITION AND QTHE£ SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECriONS. ORDER OR ORDERB: IfUiiN^j^. ^ XI-HC-22 aii^i qa f<'liti SII^F ^~Hi^)"^re^) »u ^^ ^ '^' -Tsg ^FfRFl, 'Srto®.Ta«'ll% &^..^*iS'y^'3 WTOftaallW 3?i^i'eRiiw(to Ibr ths petitioner. , liaiwaha, Panel Lawyer for |he respondent No. 2. 11-11-2005: Shrj SanjayKAgrawal, eoun^l Shri Ashutosh Singh Kach|iaMnha, ffie State/ respondentNo. 1. ShriJA. l.ohani, counselforj IA.N0.8f42of2005 This is ahapplteatiqn ftir witt(clrayi il.<rfpower ttisallowed. ~ Leamed counsel for the petitioner has tp^ pay a sum of R) amount and part payment of Inteilest order dated 31-03-2003 pasSedbl case No. 12AI.DA^97(Claim). ^ording a total calpulated interest @ 12% 4s is around Rs. 9,700/- and the petiti^ner towards interest. The petiUpnerl agre?abletosettl&theremairarig tn view offoregoing, nothing} accordingly.petitionstandsdisposejd Inteifest 4)t-41d4l'( ^ll^l'<?lf ^^^ <f<l•^H ^siPOTsn^r r^spondent? stat^ that the ,^\ 51- towards piincipal in CQmpHancswith the LabourCourt, Bitepur in tothe respohdents, 4s cllrected by Labour Couifr ispaidoniy Rs. 7,700/- and the respondent are antioyntoutside theCourt. tsurylves iri ttie petiBon and lof.' .; :' : , SdA satishK.AgitiftQtri [Tf^ 3iR^^