IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14553 of 2008 NAUSHAD ROY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 19.5.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 395 and 412 of the Penal Code which was registered against 11-12 unknown accused persons. Petitioner was put on Test Identification Parade along with other co-accused, as is evident from the T.I.P. Chart. Counsel for the petitioner with reference to the said T.I.P. chart submits that petitioner was not identified by any of the witnesses as also besides the present case he is accused in only one case in which he has already been admitted to the privilege of bail. Let both the aforesaid facts be verified by the court below and if it is true that petitioner was not identified in the Test Identification Parade as also besides the present case he is accused in only one case in which he has already been admitted to the privilege of bail, then only the petitioner, namely, Naushad Roy be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Kasba P.S.Case No. 44 of 2007 (G.R.No. 351/2007). P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)