IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28966 of 2009 BRINDA KESHRI @ RAJA @ RAJA SINGH SON OF BINDESHWAR PD. SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 27-11-2009 Heard both the parties. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under section 307/34 and other allied sections of the Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is not named in the first information report and subsequently his name transpired in confessional statement of co-accused, Shashi Ranjan, for which he has remained in custody since 23rd March, 2009 , let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- ( Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Mithanpur P.S.Case No. 132 of 2007 on the conditions : (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of - 2 - similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. ( Anjana Prakash, J ) BTiwary/