IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2010 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 33299 of 2010(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SMT.SOUDHAMINI MANI, THEKKILAKKATTUKUZHI VEEDU,(NEAR PERUVAMMUZHIVALA BRIDGE)KUNHAIKAN PO,MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. SMT.SATHYA SHREEPRIYA SRI.K.LAKSHMINARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. TAHSILDAR, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK, MUVATTUPUZHA. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, VALAKOM VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA. 3. VILASINI KUNHU, NEDUMATTATHIL HOUSE,MOONAMKUNNU, PADAKUZHA PO, MUVATTUPUZHA. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO.33299 OF 2010 (J) ===================== Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T Prayer sought in this writ petition is a direction for consideration of Ext.P3, where the petitioner seeks mutation of the property covered by Exts.P1 and P2. Going by Ext.P3, the same is pending before the 2nd respondent. Therefore, without expressing any thing on the merits of the contentions raised, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to take action on Ext.P3 with notice to the petitioner and the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE vi