HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS(^RH AT B1LASPUR DtViSION BENCH Coram : HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV QUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI SUN1L KUMAR SiNHA, J APPLICANT Defendant- Res No.3 RESPONDENTS Defendnat-Res. No.1 Defendant-Res. No.2 M.C.C. No.164 of 2006 Bhagirathi, S/o Shobharam Sahu, Aged 35 years, Occupation- Farmer, R/o. Viilage Kharra, Tah. Berla, Distt. Durg (M.P.) Now (C.G.) Versus 1. Kamlesh; S/o. Kisun Sahu, Aged about 35 yeacs, Occupation- Service 2. Kisun, S/o. Shobharam Sahu, Aged 59 yea^, occupation Patwari, Both R/o. Village Kharra, Tahsil Berla, District Durg (M.P.) Now(C.G.) 3. State of Madhya Pradesh Now Chhattisgarh, Through : the Collector Durg M.P. Now C.G. APPLICATION UNDER ORDER41 RULE 18 OF C.P.C. FOR RESTORATION OF C.R. N0.507/1997 Present: Shri Sudhir Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri V. A. Goverdhan, counsel for respondents No. 1 and2. . Shri U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocate forthe State. Res. No.4 ORDER (20m October, 2608) The foltowing order of the Court was passed Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: Learned counset for the parties are heard on No.528/2006, a petition for condonation of delay in restoration petition. .(C.5P. the yys^ " risG^. ^^-^" . '\'..'•"' ^ . ,-<S'V'' 1 • 2. On due consideration, M.(C.)P. No.528/20C» is allowed and the delay in filjng the restoration petition is hereby condoned. 3. Learned counsel for the parties are heard on the restoration petition. 4. The petitioner is seeking restoration of C.R. No.507/1^7, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 18.10.2005. 5. On due consideratlon, M.C.C. No.164/2006 is altowed and C.R. No. 507/1997 is restored to its orlginal number. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge padma