IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 14TH MARCH 2008 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 24061 of 2004(M) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- N.SHAMSUL HUDA, DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, (PRESENTLY UNDER SUSPENSION WHILE WORKING AS THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, FLYING SQUAD, PALAKKAD), 22/382-B, BYE-PASS JUNCTION, THIRUVANNUR P.O, KOZHIKODE 673 029. BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST & WILD LIFE, GOVT.SECREARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST (ADMN.), FOREST HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. M.ABDUL GAFOOR, DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, (WORKING PLAN OFFICER), PALAKKAD WORKING PLAN DIVISION, ARANYA BHAVAN COMPLEX, PALAKKAD. 4. A.K.SALEEM, DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, PUNALUR DIVISION, PUNALUR P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/03/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 24061/2004 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 22/2/95 BY THE R1. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN OP NO. 6215/95 DT. 24/3/2003 OF THIS COURT. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 21/08/95 BY THE R1. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 9/1/2003 BY THE R1. EXT.P5. COPY OF THE NOTICE BEARING NO. 5997/F1/2003/F&WLD DT. 1/08/2003 BY THE R1. EXT.P5A. COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 12/08/2003 BY THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH ANOTHER. EXT.P6. COPY OF THE ORDER GO RT NO. 201/2004 F&WLD DT. 14/5/2004 BY THE R1. EXT.P7. COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 7/6/04 BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R1. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL. True copy tga KURIAN JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- W.P.(C). No. 24061 OF 2004 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of March, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner approached this Court aggrieved by Exhibit P6 order passed by the first respondent. In view of the intervening developments whereby the petitioner has already retired from service, in case the petitioner has still any grievance left, he may approach the first respondent, in which case, the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent, with notice to the petitioner and any other affected parties, within a period of another four months. This writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp