IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3731 of 2009 MUKESH PATEL, son of Lagan Patel, resident of vill.-Barwat Pasrain, P.S.-Bettiah Mufassil, Distt.-West Champaran-------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . --------------- 3. 6.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the incident informant’s tractor and its driver disappeared. For petitioner it is said that there is no evidence at all to involve him in the incident. Paragraph nos.-13 and 14 are there to show that there was approach with one Nehal to bring back the tractor and its driver. Rupees ninety thousand was handed over also and in paragraph-14 specifically it is said that petitioner advised to make payment. No doubt complaint petition is filed after six months of the incident but till today there is no trace of the tractor or its driver. So role played by this petitioner does not entitle him for bail while investigation is in progress. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )