- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3849 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO.3849 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO.3849 OF 2003 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.679 OF 2003 APPEAL NO.679 OF 2003 APPEAL NO.679 OF 2003 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.S.R.Shinde, A.P.P. for State Mr.Shrishail Sakhare for Respondent No.1 CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 5,2006. : SEPTEMBER 5,2006. : SEPTEMBER 5,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned A.P.P. for the Applicant and Shri Sakhare for the first Respondent. Application is strongly opposed by Shri Sakhare for the first Respondent. After having perused the averments made in the Application and Affidavit of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor in support of the Application, I am satisfied that sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE