IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6219 of 2009 ASHOK KUMAR SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 18.05.2009 The petitioner claims to have been appointed, regularized, when he was terminated from service. He questioned the same in the writ application, which was allowed. The order of the writ Court was question in L.P.A. No. 969 of 2003 which was then referred to the Screening Committee of the Respondents by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner acknowledges that the Committee is yet to take any final decision with regard to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the disposal of the writ application with directions that the case of the petitioner be examined by the Committee expeditiously in terms of the directions given in L.P.A. No. 969 of 2003. Let the same be done preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)