ash 1 caf-452.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.452 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.224 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri Vikas V. Khanolkar for the Applicant. Shri Suresh Gole for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri Uday D. Dalvi i/by Shri Zia-ul-Mustafa for Respondent No.3. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 4TH AUGUST, 2011 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicant and the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd Respondent. No relief is sought in this application against the 1st and 2nd Respondents. 2. The finding of the Trial Court is that the 3rd Respondent has been forcibly dispossessed by the Applicant. Therefore, only a limited relief can be granted in favour of the Applicant in view of the fact that ash 2 caf-452.11 during the pendency of the suit, there was injunction operating against the 3rd Respondent. 3. Hence, I pass the following order. ORDER: (a) Till disposal of the Appeal, the 3rd Respondent is restrained from entering the suit premises without following due process of law. The application is disposed of. (b) It is obvious that it will be open for the 3rd Respondent to adopt appropriate remedy notwithstanding the pendency of the Appeal. (A.S.OKA, J)