1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.3708 of 2008 [Shri Shankar Bhuraji Pande v. State of Maharashtra] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri H.R. Dhumale, Advocate for Applicant. Shri D.P. Thakre, APP for State. CORAM : R.C. Chavan, J. DATE : 21st November, 2008 This is an application by one Shankar, who has been chargesheeted for having murdered of Rekha with whom he was having an in extra marital relationship. He himself gave a report that Rekha was found missing. Rekha's uncle also gave a report that she was missing. In course of investigation, it had transpired that the applicant made an extra judicial confession to his first wife Panchfula that he had in fact murdered Rekha, tied her in a gunny bag and thrown it in the river. Rekha was fished out from the river and it was found that she was tied. At the instance of the applicant, the ornaments of Rekha was recovered under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. In these circumstances, the applicant's entitlement to bail cannot be considered. The application is, therefore, rejected. 2 The learned Judge would of course evaluate the evidence when it is tendered at trial. JUDGE pdl