IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2009 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 16824 of 2009(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RUSHIDA MIL.E.I., FIDA MANZIL, KANJIRAPPALLY P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.S.AFSAL KHAN SRI.V.A.SHAJI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, KANJIRAPALLY CENTRAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.1537, KANJIRAPALLY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. MR.K.C.SANTHOSHKUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.16824 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 18th day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T The claim of the petitioner is for appointment under Rule 188A of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules. The petitioner states that on 17/03/2008 her mother, who was a peon under the 2nd respondent Bank, expired. It is stated that thereupon, claiming appointment under Rule 188A, she filed Ext.P1. But, however, there was no response from the 2nd respondent. After Ext.P2 reminder was given by the petitioner, she was informed by Ext.P3 that in view of the present financial crisis of the Bank, and as the Bank does not want the vacancies to be filled up, it has been decided not to make appointment to the vacant posts. The petitioner submits that since Ext.P3 lacks in bonafides, she filed Ext.P4 before the 1st respondent. In this writ petition what the petitioner seeks is a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P4, and pass orders thereon. 2. Taking into account the limited nature of the relief that is sought for, I dispose of the writ petition directing the 1st respondent WP(C) No.16824/2009 -2- to consider Ext.P4, if the same has been received and is pending. Orders shall be passed on the representation with notice to the 2nd respondent Bank as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg