•S^^'K „ ••-W^f JJ^if..^ y^^Ti 8 ^^ 1^^-^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA W.P.ICINQ. •361°) 72011 Subhania Anjurnan Islamia Bilaspur, (A Society Registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860). Through its Secretary Mr. Abdul Wadud Faridi, S/o Shri Abdul Rauf Faridi, aged about -68 years, R/o Koni, Tahsil & District - Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus : 1. The Chhattisgarh State Waqf Board, Acting through its, Chief Executive Officer, G-12/3, Devendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The President, Chhattisgarh State Waqf Board, C-12/3, Devendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Chhattisgarh State Waqf Board, Raipur, C-12/3, Devendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) ^-'4. Collector, Bilaspur, liistrict-Bilaspur (C.G.) < 5. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Bilaspur, Tahsil SE District- Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS, ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS, ETC. The petitioner respectfully begs to submit as under:- ^.••A<^ q^c/ ^•^>" :.^ '''f'^i/^ ^^^^ \\^ HIGH (SURTOF CHHATnSGARH AT KL^PUR WMT PETmON fCTNo. 3619 of2011 PETmONER RESPONDENTS Subhania Anjuman IsUaniia Bilaspur. VERSUS The Chhattis^rh State Waqf Board & odiers. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 QFTHE CQNSimONPF INDIA 8B: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Aenihotri, J. Amit Present: Shri K.R.Ansari, Senior Advocate with Shri R.L.Bajpayee, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Prateek Shamia amiShri Ali Asga, Advocates forthe respondent No. 1 to 3. Shri V.V.S.MoOTtfay, Depirty Advocate General for the State/ respoadent No. 4 aad 5. ORDtarORAL) (Passed on 08tn day ofJuly, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appeariag for Ifae petitioner, on instructions, seefcs pennission ofthis Court to withdraw this petiti<m with libaty to take reeourse to altemative statutory forum as provided under section 83 ofthe WakfAct, 1995. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side have no objection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdravm witfa the afiirastated libaty, ifso advised. Satish K. Agniliotri Judge