THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.9527 OF 2010 Dated 31st May, 2010 Between: Golla Gopalam …Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police, E.G.District, Kakinada and 3 others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.K.Venkatesh Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: AGP for Home Counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4: --- The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent No.2, in acting on the petitioner’s complaint, dated 25-03-2010, filed against respondent Nos.3 and 4, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. I have heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing respondent Nos.1 and 2. In the view this Court is proposing to take, it is not necessary to hear respondent Nos.3 and 4. A perusal of the averments contained in the affidavit filed by the petitioner shows that there is a dispute between the petitioner on one side and respondent Nos.3 and 4 on the other in respect of Ac.6-95 cents of land in Survey Nos.13/2A and 13/2B of Ummetta Village, Gangavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. The dispute is pending before the revisional authority and in W.P.No.8970 of 2006, this Court is stated to have passed an order on 27-02-2006 directing maintenance of status quo. The petitioner alleged that respondent Nos.3 and 4 and their supporters have trespassed into the said land by causing obstruction to him to cultivate the same and that thereupon he gave a report to respondent No.2 on 25-03- 2010. The grievance of the petitioner is that no action has been taken by respondent No.2 on the said report. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions submitted that respondent No.2 has not received any report allegedly given by the petitioner. Though the petitioner filed a copy of the purported report, he has not filed any acknowledgment in support thereof. In the light of the stand taken by respondent No.2 that he has not received any report, liberty is given to the petitioner to approach respondent No.2 with fresh report. If such report is given by the petitioner, respondent No.2 shall take appropriate action in accordance with law. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.12296 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 31st May, 2010 lur