FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6648 OF 2011 "Sunita Ashok Bharaskar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Sunita W/o. Ashok Bharaskar Age 42 years, Occ. At present Nil R/o. Shevgaon, Tq. Shevgaon, Dist. Ahmednagar. ... Petitioner. Versus 1] The State of Maharashtra 2] The Under Secretary, Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 3] The District Supply Officer Ahmednagar, Tq. & Dist. Ahmednagr. 4] The Indian Oil Corporation Limited (Marketing Division) Aurangabad Divisional Officer, Plot No. 99, Jyoti Nagar, Aurangabad 431 005. .. Respondents. Mr. R.N. Dhorde, Advocate holding for Mr. V.R. Dhorde, Advocate for petitioner. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6648 OF 2011 "Sunita Ashok Bharaskar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 Mr. V.H. Dighe, AGP for respondent No .1 to 3. Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 5TH OCTOBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2] The petitioner has approached this court since respondent Nos. 1 to 4 have failed to transfer the licence standing in the name of the petitioner's husband, in the name of the petitioner and other heirs, which was originally allotted in the name of the deceased husband of the petitioner and consequent refusal on the part of the respondent nos. 1 to 3, in not allotting quota to the petitioner. 3] The respondent No.4 has now already executed a dealership agreement with the petitioner as legal representative of the deceased Ashokrao Bharaskar. In that view of the matter, in so far as prayer (B) is concerned, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6648 OF 2011 "Sunita Ashok Bharaskar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 3 4] We see no difficulty in respondent Nos. 1 to 3, transferring licence in favour of the petitioner and other legal heirs of deceased Ashokrao, inasmuch as, respondent No.4 has already executed dealership agreement with the petitioner. 5] In that view of the matter, we direct respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to transfer the license in the name of the petitioner, in any case, prior to 31st October, 2011. We further direct the respondents to continue to allot the quota to the petitioner, as was directed by us vide our ad-interim order dated 7th September, 2011. Rule made absolute in aforesaid terms, with no orders as to costs. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-