THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.16720 of 2009 DATED: 13.08.2009 Between: P.Koti Reddy. .. Petitioner. And The District Collector, Guntur District, Guntur, and others. .. Respondents. ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the 1st respondent in not disposing of the stay application filed by the petitioner in RC.No.1823/2009-D5, dated 21.05.2009, as illegal and arbitrary. It appears, the 4th respondent submitted a representation dated 18.08.2008 to the 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Narasaraopet, alleging that out of Ac.15.00 of the land in Sy.No.65 of Nayanipalem village of Vinukonda Mandal, belonging to him, the petitioner has encroached into the land to an extent of Ac.3.50 cents and fraudulently obtained Pattadar Pass Book and Title deed over the encroached land and, therefore, he requested the 2nd respondent to cancel the Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deed obtained by the petitioner and also to correct the survey numbers of his land. Pursuant to the said representation, the 2nd respondent called for the reports from the 3rd respondent-Tahsildar, Venukonda, and the Deputy Inspector of Survey, Narsaraopet, and basing on the said reports and also on verification of available connected record, the 2nd respondent issued proceedings dated 09.03.2009 cancelling the Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deeds issued in favour of the petitioner with respect to the land to an extent of Ac.3.50 in Sy.No.65 of Nayanipalem village of Vinukonda Mandal and also instructed the 3rd respondent to incorporate the changes in the village records. Aggrieved by the proceedings dated 09.03.2009 of the 2nd respondent, the petitioner preferred Revision in RC.No.1823/2009-D5, along with stay petition, before the 1st respondent-District Collector, Guntur District. The grievance of the petitioner is that though the revision preferred by him has been taken up by the 1st respondent, till date no orders are passed on the stay petition, even though the order impugned therein was passed without any jurisdiction and competency. Hence, this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the official respondents. In the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits, the 1st respondent-District Collector, Guntur District, is directed to dispose of the revision filed by the petitioner against the proceedings dated 09.03.2009 passed by the 2nd respondent, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till disposal of the said revision by the 1st respondent, the proceedings dated 09.03.2009 of the 2nd respondent shall not be given effect to. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 13.08.2009 v v