IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 21ST OCTOBER 2010 / 29TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 25223 of 2010(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- LAILA BEEVI, AGED 59 YEARS, W/O. EASUKUNJU, VALIYAVILA VEEDU, PARAKUNNU P.O., NAVAIKULAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 603. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF SRI.A.MOHAMED RASHEED RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SURVEY DIRECTOR, SURVEY DIRECTORATE, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014. 3. RE-SURVEY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-685 121. 4. ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, ATTINGAL-695 101. *ADDL. R5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. *(IMPLEADED ADDITIONAL 5TH RESPONDENT AS PER ORDER DATED 14/09/2010 IN I.A.NO.12178/2010) MR.P.NARAYANAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.25223 of 2010 (C) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 21st day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T The issue raised in this writ petition is the claim of the petitioner that there is mistake in the survey records maintained by the respondents. 2. Although several contentions on the merits are raised, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer for consideration and disposal of Exts.P14 & P15, which are pending before respondents 2 & 5 respectively. 3. According to the petitioner, Ext.P10 is the proceedings of the 3rd respondent, in which, a mistake was crept in so far as the re-survey records mentioned therein are concerned, it is stated that seeking correction of Ext.P10, she has filed Ext.P14, which is pending before the 2nd respondent. According to the petitioner, it was in pursuance to Ext.P10 that the 4th respondent has passed Ext.P13 order, against which the WP(C) No.25223/2010 -2- petitioner has filed Ext.P15 appeal, which is pending consideration of the additional 5th respondent. It is the disposal of Exts.P14 & P15 what is sought for by the petitioner. 4. Since according to the petitioner, Ext.P13 order has been passed in pursuance to Ext.P10, and as Ext.P14 has been filed seeking correction of Ext.P10, all what is required to be done is that the 2nd respondent should consider Ext.P14. This the 2nd respondent shall do with notice to the petitioner and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 5. Once orders are passed on Ext.P14, it will be open to the petitioner to produce the same before the additional 5th respondent, and on production thereof, the additional 5th respondent shall consider Ext.P15 appeal and pass orders thereon with notice to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks thereafter. It is directed that in the meanwhile coercive action, if any pursuant to WP(C) No.25223/2010 -3- Ext.P13, shall be kept in abeyance. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before respondents 2 & 5 respectively for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg