1 Crim.Appln. No.841/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 841 OF 2010 Shri Mukesh Talakshi Savala & Ors. ...Applicants vs. Mr.Ramesh S. Udwani & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Meghashyam Kocharekar for the Applicants. Mr.S.P. Kanuga with Mr.J.S. Chandnani for Respondent No.1. Mrs.R.V. Newton, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : JULY 21, 2010 P.C. :- 1 Heard Counsel for the applicant and Counsel for the respondent. 2 This application is filed by the applicant for quashing the complaint filed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 27th Court, Mulund, Mumbai, under Sections 341, 355, 357, 427, 504, 506-I read with 34 of the IPC. 2 Crim.Appln. No.841/2009 3 The applicants are Developers of a property in which the respondent-complainant is one of the occupants of a flat situated in a Co-operative Housing Society. A complaint was filed by the respondent in which he alleged that the Developers did not give sufficient Bank Guarantee as envisaged in the Development Agreement and since the respondent-complainant did not vacate the premises, he was pressurized in various ways and water connection, electricity was disconnected and he was threatened and assaulted at the behest of the applicants herein. 4 I have perused the complaint. The complaint discloses prima face commission of offence. The ingredients of offences mentioned in the complaint, prima facie, are spelt out from the averments in the complaint. Hence, at this stage, it is not possible to interfere with the order of issuance of process by the learned Magistrate. The applicants are always 3 Crim.Appln. No.841/2009 are at liberty to file an appropriate application for discharge at the appropriate stage. 5 Hence, the Criminal Application is dismissed and disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)