IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.120 of 2011 Ram Bhagwan Singh Versus The State of Bihar & Anr. For the State-Mrs. Indu Bala Pandey, A.P.P. ----------- 2. 09.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The husband petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 19 (4) of the Family Courts Act against the order dated 16.11.2010 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ara in Criminal Misc. no. 199 of 2008 by which he has been directed to pay sum of Rs. 2,500/- to his wife and 2,500/- per month to his daughter as interim maintenance and it has also made clear that if the petitioner pays the amount of maintenance, in pursuance to the direction of the Womens Commission that amount to be deducted. After some argument Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file a petition before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court for the stay of the execution of the distress warrant and he is ready to pay a sum of Rs. 10,000/- within two weeks and the current amount as interim maintenance and is ready to get the aforesaid maintenance case decided at an early date. In pursuance to the order dated 16.11.2010 passed by the impugned order, if the petitioner pay Rs. 10,000/- within 2 two weeks and current amount of maintenance the learned Principal Judge, Family Court will consider his application. If such petition is filed by the petitioner before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court it will be considered and the steps will be taken for early disposal of the maintenance case. With this above observation and direction the prayer is allowed. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Kamlesh (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)