IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43285 of 2008 DEEPAK PODDAR S/O-Late Shanker Poddar, R/O-Vill-Ganj Bazar, P.S.-Dalsingsarai, Distt.-Samastipur. …………………………………………..Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ……………………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 5/ 07.04.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Initially a complaint was filed which was sent to police for registration of the First Information Report under Sections 363, 366A/372 of the Indian Penal Code. The complainant has alleged that her daughters namely Nirupam Kumari and Anupam Kumari had gone for taking coaching. The petitioner and others enticed away Nirupam Kumari and this fact was disclosed by her daughter Anupam Kumari who accompanied her to the said coaching. Submission is that the allegation has been corroborated during investigation. There is no explanation as to why the occurrence of 25.05.2007 reported after such a long lapse of time by way of complaint. The petitioner had no concerned with the alleged victim. He is in custody since 23.05.2008. The entire allegation is against the others not the - 2 - petitioner. Prayers for bail of similarly situated co- accused persons Anmol Kumar Poddar vide Cr. Misc. No. 562 of 2008 and Rajesh Kumar vide Cr. Misc. No. 9025/2008 on 23.09.2008 and 28.07.2008 respectively. The girl is still traceless. Considering this, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)