IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14480 of 2010 Sulakhan Singh Vs. POLC, Central Govt.Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-1, Chandiarh & another Present: Mr.Harchand Singh Batth, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The finding of the Labour Court is that the petitioner- workman could not produce even a single document to show that he was employed by the Management. Workman had produced on record various documents, which were marked as W1 to W173. These documents were considered by the Labour Court and the same related to his working with the Management. These were the entries in the cash sales control register and preparation of sales supply vouchers. Not even a single document could be shown proving that petitioner was directly appointed or engaged by the Management. In defence, the Management also did not produce any record to show that the petitioner was an employee of the contractor, but the Labour Court appreciated the fact in the background that the burden was on the petitioner to prove that he was in the employment of the Management and having not succeeded in that, he has failed. The approach adopted by the Labour Court is in accordance with law and would not call for any interference. Dismissed. August 18, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE