1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3555 OF 2006 (Dr.Usha d/o Dattarao Kadam nee Dr.Usha Vijay Katkar vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.N.S.Choudhary, Adv., for the applicant, absent. Mr.N.R.Shaikh, APP for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Respondent no.3 served. ... CORAM: A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATE:13/10/2011 1. None appears for the petitioner. 2. Perused the petition. Heard learned A.P.P. 3. The complaint, subject matter of this application, has led to registration of offence under Section 3(1)(xii) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. and under Sections 376, 313, 506 of IPC. 4. Perusal of the petition discloses that the petitioner is disputing the probability of existence of the story narrated in the complaint. 5. Truthfulness or otherwise of the complaint has to surface after investigation and is subject to 2 outcome of the trial, in the event it emerges in chargesheet. 6. In this background, we are satisfied that further stay of the FIR would not, in any manner, serve cause of justice. It is necessary in the interest of justice to dismiss the petition, which we do. 7. The interim order by way of bail was already granted by this Court on 27th Nov.,2006, it shall remain in operation until investigation is completed, and till the petitioner causes her appearance and applies for regular bail, in the event the chargesheet is filed. Rule is made partly absolute accordingly. (A.R.JOSHI) (A.H.JOSHI) JUDGE JUDGE ... agp/3555-06crapl