IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.125 OF 2007 ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ Ms.S.V.Bharucha with ¦ Mr.S.D.Bhosale for the Appellant. ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & ¦ J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. ¦ DATED: 17TH JULY, 2008 P.C.: Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. Perused the order. It appears that in view of the amendment in sub-rule 4 of Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, there was no duty cast for payment of the amount equal to the duty of excise on the date of removal of goods. Therefore, the duty has been paid as per the provisions of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rule. We do not find any substantial question of law arises. Hence, Appeal is rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)