IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-10524 of 2011 Date of Decision : 25.07.2011 Ajaib Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present : Mr. A. D. S. Sukhija, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. S. S. Swaich, Advocate for respondent No.3. * * * * L.N.MITTAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for respondent No.3 states that respondent No.3 has no grouse against the petitioner in view of his affidavit and statement before the police as well as before this Court in the Habeas Corpus petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of aforesaid statement on behalf of respondent No.3 as well as in view of reply on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the aforesaid, the instant petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. ( L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE 25th July, 2011 'raj'