IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.R.BANNURMATH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2009 / 3RD ASHADHA 1931 WA.No. 785 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.7631/2009 Dated 27/03/2009 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER: -------------- ALL KERALA EX-SERVICEMEN SECURITY STAFF ASSOCIATION OF BSNL (REG NO 104/03) DISTRICT COMMITTEE, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SRI P.R.AYYAPPAN, S/O. P.A.RAMAN,PARAMBIL HOUSE KORATTY PO 680 308. BY ADV. SRI.C.ANIL KUMAR SRI.FRANCIS JOSEPH KURISINKAL RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. BHARATH SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED (BSNL) ERNAKULAM SSA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM, BSNL, BHAVAN KALATHIPARAMBIL ROAD, ERNAKULAM. 2. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (R&E) OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOM BSNL, BHAVAN, KALATHIPARAMBIL ROAD, ERNAKULAM. 3. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RE-SETTLEMENT (DGR) DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF RE-SETTLEMENT, WEST BLOCK IV, R.K.PURAM, NEW DELHI. SRI.C.S.RAMANATHAN , SC, BSNL R3 BY ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.R.BANNURMATH, C.J. & KURIAN JOSEPH,J. ------------------------------------------------- W.A.No.785 of 2009 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT S.R.Bannurmath, C.J. The writ petitioner-appellant, aggrieved by the order of the learned single Judge directing the Director General of Resettlement to consider Ext.P17 in the matter of upkeeping service on open contract at BSNL Ernakulam, with notice to the petitioner-appellant, has filed the present appeal. After hearing counsel on both sides and perusing the pleadings, in our view as it is basically for the Director General of Resettlement to sponsor the security agencies for the deployment of security personnel, the grievances of the petitioner, if any, can be considered by the DGR and as such we find no reason to interfere with the judgment of the learned single Judge. However, as the time limit prescribed by the learned single Judge has expired, we W.A.No.785 of 2009 -:2:- direct the DGR to consider the matter within four weeks from the date of receipt of this judgment or production of the same by any of the parties. The writ appeal is disposed of as above. S.R.BANNURMATH, Chief Justice KURIAN JOSEPH, Judge ahg. S.R.BANNURMATH, C.J. & KURIAN JOSEPH,J. --------------------------- W.A.No.785 of 2009 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 24th June, 2009