IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13809 of 2009 RAM ASHRAY CHAUDHARY & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 21.5.2009 It appears that some error has crept in the order dated 24.4.2009. After hearing submission made on behalf of the petitioners, this Court had directed that the anticipatory bail application of Petitioner Nos.1` and 2 is hereby rejected and anticipatory bail was granted to Petitioner No.3, who is married Nanad. But in the same order it has been wrongly recorded that anticipatory bail application of Petitioner Nos.1 and 3 is rejected. The same should be read to mean as prayer for anticipatory bail Petitioner Nos.1 and 2, namely, Ram Ashray Chaudhury and Savitri Devi respectively is hereby rejected. In place of Petitioner No.2 who has been described as Nanad in the said order, the name of Petitioner No.3 Sunaina Devi who happens to be Nanad be read. In other words, anticipatory bail application of Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 stands rejected and prayer for anticipatory bail of Petitioner No.3, namely, Sunaina Devi is allowed. Rest of the order shall remain the same. The above corrections may be read in the order dated 24.4.2009. Let a copy of this order be sent through FAX to 2 the court below at the cost of the petitioners. SKBOSE (Ajay Kumar Tripathi)