IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. (.4^ IIQO^- WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER c.^.-" ^^'.v^S ;^Lfr-' ^01 ^ (o ^-^ RESPONDENTS ^4- ^^Q-"' ^^s^ ^^)- ^^. yy >.A«*•••" 1. 1. rGendlal Patel, aged about 41 years, son of Shri Chandrashekhar Patel, Assistant Teacher, Governrhent Primar/ School Saraipali, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (sl.no. 13 of Annexure P-1) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of School' Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Distt. Education Officer Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT TH.E PETLTIONER HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.fSl No. 122 of 2007 Petitwner : RamKaron Ram Versus Respondents : State of Chhaftisgarh A o'thers W. P.fS) No. 140 <rf 2007 Petitioner ; fiendlal Patel Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh A ano'ther W. P.(S) No. 141 af 2007 PetH-ioner : 6opal Prusad Bharadwaj Versus Kespondents ; State of Chhattisgarfi &another W. P.fSl No. 162 of 2007 Petitioner : Jagtal Ram Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-is9arh A wwlher W. P.(S) No. 163 ®f2007 Petitioner : Smt. Sudha Bhogat Versus Respondents : State of Chhaftisgarh &cuwther W. P.fSl No. 164 of 2007 Petitwner : Vishwakarma Rcrthia Versus Respondents : State of ChhattiS9arh & onother W. P.IS) No. 166 of 2007 Petitioners : Ibalin Ekka and another Versus ftesponden-te ; State of Chhattisgarh A onother W. P.fSi No. 167 <rf 2007 PetH-ioner : Abrahaun Ekka Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh A ano'tiier ^ •esent: W. P.(S»No. 181 of 2007 Petitioner : Ram Sin9h AAali Versus Respondents : Storte of Chhatt-isgarh A ano'ther W.P.fSlNo. 182 cf 2007 Petitkiner : Teekaram Ncyak Vwsus Reqiondents : Stcrte of Chhattisgarh & another W. P.(S) No 183 <rf 2007 Petitioners : Fo9uram Koshle and others Versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh A another And W. P.fS) No. 186 of 2007 Petitioner : Ku. Abrista Khes Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'iS9arh & another SB: Hon'ble AAr. Justue Satish K. Agnihutri. J Shri A.N. Bhakta, Advocate for Ihe petitioners (s). Mrs. Anju Ahuju, Depu-ty Sovemment Advpcate, Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panet Lawyer, AAs. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for 1+ie respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on tiiis 17th t)ay of Januory, 2007) The followingorder of -riie Court- is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. Leamed counsel appeotf-ing for the petitioners as tiwll as for the State/respondents jomtly submit -that Ihe facts of the present writ 3 petitions are similar to that of in W. P. (S) No. 5473/2006(Rakesh Kumar Shnrnw A ono'ther vs. State of Chhattisgarh <S others), which was disposed of vide order darted 9.10.2006. They further submit that the question of law mvolved is also the same. 2. In view of the above-stai^d submissions made by leamed counsel for the part-ies -these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order f ;. dated 9.10.2006 possed by *is Court m W. P. (S) hto. 5473/2006 (Ratesh Kumar Sharma A anoltier vs. State of Chhatt-is9arh & others). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of •this order be placed on record in connected matfers. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhad)