1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2744 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2166 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.3508 OF 2004 1.Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. & another. ...Plaintiffs vs. Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank Ltd. ...Defendant. --- Mr.P.P.Charan i/b. Little & Co., for Plaintiffs. Mr.S.Chandran with Ms.Ragalakshmi Nair i/b. M.K.Ambalal & Co. for defendants in support. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. 2 DATED: 21st April,2007 P.C.:- 1. This is a notice of motion taken out by the defendant. The learned Counsel appearing for defendant states that the records other than the MICR tapes have been submitted on 6.10.2005 in the Court. The statement is accepted. The notice of motion is granted in terms of prayer clause a (i). 2. The learned Counsel further states that the defendant has filed an affidavit disclosing the reasons why MICR tapes cannot be deposited. The plaintiffs have not filed any reply disputing the averments made in that affidavit, and therefore, accepting those averments at face value, the notice of motion is granted in terms of prayer clause (a)(ii). The notice of motion is disposed of. 3 ---