IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 6311 of 2009 Between: Sushil Kumar Agarwal, S/o. Sri Rajender Kumar Agarwal, R/o. H.NO. 22-5-484/5, Panjeshah, Agra Colony, Hyderabad.-A.P. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by the Commissioner, having its Office at Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 2 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by the Assistant City Planner, Circle No.II, Sardar Mahal, Hyderabad. 3 Sri Shankarlal Agarwal S/o.Late Giridharlal R/o.H.No.5-9-22/A/11, Adarsh Nagar, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 4 Smt. Aruna Bai W/o.Shankarlal Agarwal R/o.H.No.5-9-22/A/11, Adarsh Nagar, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 5 Smt. Swetha Agarwal D/o.Shankarlal Agarwal R/o.H.No.5-9-22/A/11, Adarsh Nagar, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No.1 to 2 herein to take the necessary and immediate action as per Law to prevent the illegal construction of the Respondent No.3 to 5 herein in the property from carrying on with the further illegal construction in property i.e., in the cellar portion of the complex known as G.S. Market Complex, in premises bearing No. 21-1-746 to 750, situated at Patel Market, Rikabgunj Hyderabad, and also to demolish the illegal construction which was already made in the said property by the Respondent No.3 to 5 herein, in the interest of justice; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI PAWAN KUMAR AGARWAL, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Sri R.Radhakrishna Reddy, S.C. for GHMC for the respondents 1 and 2, the Court made the following: ORDER: It is the case of the petitioner that the unofficial respondents are making construction without the sanction plan. That already this court in W.P.No.27749 of 2008 filed against the very same respondents has by order dated 22-12-2008 while disposing of the writ petition, directed the unofficial respondents to maintain status quo and not to make any further construction. Despite adjourning the matter, no instructions are reported by the respondent counsel. -2- Hence, status quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained. The unofficial respondents shall not make any further construction. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, having its Office at Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 2. 2. The Assistant City Planner,Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Circle No.II, Sardar Mahal, Hyderabad. 3. Sri Shankarlal Agarwal S/o.Late Giridharlal R/o.H.No.5-9-22/A/11, Adarsh Nagar, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 4. Smt. Aruna Bai W/o.Shankarlal Agarwal R/o.H.No.5-9-22/A/11, Adarsh Nagar, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 5. Smt. Swetha Agarwal D/o.Shankarlal Agarwal R/o.H.No.5-9-22/A/11, Adarsh Nagar, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. ( 1 to 5 by RPAD) 6. One C.C.to Sri Pawan Kumar Agarwal Advocate. (OPUC) 7. One C.C.to Sri R. Radhakrishna Reddy Advocate. (OPUC) 8. one spare copy. HIGH COURT NVR.J DATED 6-04-2009 ORDER W.P.NO. 6311 OF 2009 STATUS QUO Bsr Dt. 7-4-2009 HIGH COURT NVR.J DATED 6-04-2009 ORDER W.P.NO. 6311 OF 2009 STATUS QUO