1 S.A.NO.239/2007. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. SECOND APPEAL NO.239 OF 2007. 1. Sau.Laxmibai W/o Uttamrao Lipane & another. ...Appellants. (Ori.plaintiffs) Versus 1. Devidas Soundaji Lipane & others. ...Respondents. ... Mr.Mahesh P.Kale, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.A.R.Nikam, Advocate for the respondents no.1 to 5. ... CORAM: A.V.NIRGUDE,J. Date : 23rd July, 2009. COURT'S ORDER: 1. The appeal is filed against the concurrent findings of the Lower Courts holding that the east boundary of the appellants' land has been used as road. It is the appellants' witness who proved this fact against the appellants original stand that there existed no road or footpath on the east boundary of the land. In view of un-equivocal evidence on record, 2 S.A.NO.239/2007. unfortunately brought by the appellants' witness there is no reason to entertain this second appeal. There exists no substantial question of Law. The appeal stands dismissed. 2. In view of this, Civil Application No.2605/2007 does not survive. It also stands dismissed. (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.) lkp.