1 S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.5354/2006 Date : 05.12.2006 HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. H.S. Sidhu for the applicant. Mr. V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that parties have lodged cross FIR against each other under Section 307 IPC. He submits that both the sides including the applicant have sustained injuries. He further submits that injury attributed on head of the injured by sharp-edged weapon, as per the medical report caused by blunt object and does not disclose that same is dangerous to life. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. I have considered the submissions made before me. 2 After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that applicant Surendra Kumar s/o Sita Ram shall be released on bail in FIR No.230/2006 P.S. Keshrisinghpur, District Sri Ganganagar, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J.