IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23851 of 2009 1. MURARI SINGH @ KRISHNA MURARI SINGH, SON OF LATE JUGESHWAR SINGH 2. RAM NARESH SINGH, SON OF LATE NANDU SINGH 3. NAGESHWAR SINGH @ NAGENDRA SINGH @ NAGA SINGH, SON OF LATE GORAKH SINGH 4. JANAK NANDANI DEVI @ JANAK LALI DEVI, WIFE OF NAGENDRA SINGH. ----- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 6 8.10.2009 This quashing application has been filed against the order dated 12.5.2009 passed by the Additional Session Judge/Fast Track Court No. 2nd, Muzaffarpur in Sessions Trial No. 53 of 2005. By the impugned order the Court has allowed the application under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and permitted the informant to examine Priyanka Kumari his daughter as a witness in the trial. Apparently there was a mistake in the diary and the Investigating Officer had recorded Ranjana Kumari @ Priyanka Kumari as one person. It is specifically stated that there are two different persons and the informant has two daughters one by the name of Ranjana Kumari and the other by the name of Priyanka Kumari. It is well settled that the Court can allow the parties to examine a witness if it considers that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. This is a case in which both the daughters of the informant are witnesses to the occurrence and as such there is no anomaly in the order dated 12.5.2009. This application is thus dismissed. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)