IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 20TH JUNE 2008 / 30TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 15373 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SHANI UDAYAN UPSA, HSS, MAYYANAD,RESIDING AT THAMARASSERY HOUSE MAYYANAD. BY ADV. SRI.G.SASIDHARAN CHEMPAZHANTHIYIL SRI.S.VISHNU RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF DDE, KOLLAM. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER THEVALLY, KOLLAM. 5. THE MANAGER, H.S.S. MAYYANAD MAYYANAD P.O., KOLLAM. 6. SMT.DIJI.S, UPSA, HSS MAYYANAD, KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI A.J.VARGHESE FOR R1-4 BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL - R6 SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T. SANKARAN,J. -------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.15373 of 2008 E -------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of June, 2008. J U D G M E N T Ext.P9 order dated 18.4.2008 was passed by the Director of Public Instruction by which the Director held that Smt.Diji, S. (sixth respondent herein) is entitled to get her appointment approved from 4.6.2007 to 31.3.2008 in the leave without allowance vacancy. The Director of Public Instruction also issued a direction to the District Educational Officer to approve the appointment of Smt. Diji, S. for the aforesaid period in the pay scale eligible. The petitioner, Shani Udayan, has filed Ext.P10 revision dated 16.5.2008 before the Government challenging Ext.P9 order passed by the Director of Public Instruction. Ext.P10 revision is pending disposal. 2. Smt. Diji, S. filed W.P.(C) No.14004/2008 before this Court for the purpose of issuing appropriate direction to implement Ext.P9 order passed by the Director of Public Instruction. This Court disposed of the Writ Petition by judgment dated 26.5.2008 holding that unless Ext.P9 order has been interdicted by any superior authority, the District Educational Officer shall forthwith implement the decision in Ext.P9 order. Challenging the judgment in W.P.(C) No.14004/2008, the petitioner herein filed W.A.No.1194/2008 which was disposed of by judgment dated 9.6.2008. The petitioner pointed out that against WP(C) No.15373/2008 2 Ext.P9 order, she had filed Ext.P10 revision dated 16.5.2008 and that the said revision is pending. Taking note of the same, the Division Bench set aside the judgment in W.P.(C)m No.14004/2008 and directed the Government to consider the revision petition as expeditiously as possible with notice to the aggrieved parties and the management. 3. In view of the judgment dated 9.6.2008 in W.A.No.1194/2008, no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition. It is only to be closed. The Writ Petition is accordingly closed. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE. cks