THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3827 of 2011 Dated 18th February, 2011 Between: P.C.Narasimhulu and others …Petitioners And The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Narasimhulu Parise Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: AGP for Endowments Counsel for respondent Nos.3 & 4: Sri V.T.M.Prasad The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation of the petitioners dated 10.02.2011 for extending the lease period on enhancement of 5% on the existing lease amount, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to conduct auction pursuant to the auction notice dated 09.02.2011 issued by respondent Nos.3 and 4.” After arguing the case for sometime, Sri Narasimhulu Parise, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to his clients to approach the Executive Authority of respondent No.3-Devasthanam for redressal of their grievance. This request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.4736 of 2011 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 18th February, 2011 VGB