IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 4803/2008 Decided on:16.8.2010 _____________________________________________ Jagbir Singh. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. N.D. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is represented by the learned counsel for the parties that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Smt. Nirmal Goel and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh, CWP (T) No. 6911/2008 decided on 20.5.2010. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Respondents are directed to do the needful within a period of ten weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment by the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 petitioner in view of the principles laid down in the judgment quoted hereinabove. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 16.8.2010 *awasthi*