IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.481 of 2010 MAHMOOD ALAM, S/o Hanif, R/o Vill. Harswa, P.S. Pranpur, Dist. Katihar. Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 11.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The revision application is filed against the order dated 22.02.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. IV, Katihar in Cr. Appeal No. 59 of 2000 and the order dated 21.09.2000 passed by the S.D.J.M., Katihar in connection with G.R. No. 241 of 1996/T.R. No. 924 of 2000. Sentence is only pressed referring the allegation of demand only after two years of the marriage, though that is followed by torture of different kind including non-providing of meal and for the last occasion while the complainant was ousted and beaten also. The case is filed in the year 1995 and petitioner surrendered on 18.03.2010 and remained in custody in the trial Court since 21.09.1996 to 05.02.1997. That period can be observed sufficient towards sentence. I agree with the submission advanced by the 2 learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the revision application is partly allowed on the point of sentence which is modified and minimized to the period undergone and the above named petitioner is directed to be released forthwith subject to deposit of fine, if not wanted in any other case. Rest of the Judgment and order dated 22.02.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. IV, Katihar in Cr. Appeal No. 59 of 2000 and the order dated 21.09.2000 passed in G.R. No. 241 of 1996/T.R. No. 924 of 2000 by the S.D.J.M., Katihar are hereby confirmed. Let the order be communicated to the trial court through F.A.X. at the cost of the petitioner. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)