IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12000 of 2011 RAMESHWAR PRASAD GUPTA @ RAMJEE GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The F.I.R. was lodged on recovery of dead body of deceased with pressed neck and acid burnt injury. The suspicion was raised against Arun Chourasia, the nephew of informant and his friend. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. The suspicion has been raised during investigation and investigation is still pending against him and other persons. However, this contention of the petitioner has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the informant. However, the informant submits that the petitioner was last seen with the victim. It is submitted by the learned 2 counsel for the petitioner that if the petitioner was last seen with the deceased then he ought to have been named in the F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 151 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Bhojpur at Ara subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)