IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7894 of 2008 Dhanjay Kumar, son of Sri Hazari Lal Thakur, resident of Bhushaula, Danapur Chauk, P.S. Phulwarisharif, District Patna……..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar at New Secretariat, Balley Road, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Patna, District Patna. 4. The D.S.E., Patna District Patna. 5. The S.D.O. Civil, Sub-division, District Patna. 6. The Block Development Officer, Block – Phulwarisharif, District Phulwarisharif, Patna. 7. Block Education Extension Officer, Block – Phulwarishrif, District Phulwarisharif, Patna. 8. Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Bhusaula Danapur, Block – Phulwarisharif, District Patna. 9. Panchayat Sewak, Gram Panchayat Bhusaula Danapur, Block –Phulwarisharif, District Patna. 10. Gautam Kumar, Son of Vijay Kumar Singh, Phulia Tola, P.S. Phulwarisharif, District Patna…………………………………………………………….…Respondents ---------------------------------- 2 09.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Admittedly, petitioner was appointed as Shiksha Mitra in 2003 on contract for 11 months and thereafter his engagement was not renewed and in his place, somebody else was appointed. Petitioner has filed this writ application in 2008 contending that 2 petitioner, who was appointed as Shiksha Mitra, has been terminated in 2004 after relation became strained with the Mukhiya. The writ application does not show that petitioner filed any complaint before any authority within the prescribed time. In any case, cause of action to him had arisen in 2004 itself for which he has filed this writ application in 2008. The matter has therefore, become stale. The writ application is, therefore, dismissed. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)