IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.7841 of 2009 Between: B. Vidyasagar, S/o. B. Narsaiah, R/o. 3-6-482, Subash Nagar, Karimnagar. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, Higher Education, Nampally, Hyderabad (College of Education). 2 The Principal, Governmetn Degree College, Bellampalli, Adilabad District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. G.ARUN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents:AGP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents in releasing the NSS Programme Office remuneration, Clean and Green expenditure amount and Service Book of the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary. Heard Sri G.Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner, who worked in respondent No.2 College as Physical Director and was subsequently transferred to Government Degree College, Godavarikhani with effect from 23.11.2004, is that respondent No.2, who is stated to have developed bias against the petitioner has not been releasing the above-mentioned amounts and the service register to the petitioner and that on account of the same, the petitioner is not receiving salaries at the transferred place to the tune of more than Rs.25,000/-. The petitioner claimed that though he made a representation on 01.11.2008 to respondent No.1 to intervene and take appropriate action to redress his grievance, respondent No.1 has not been taking any action so far. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education, I am of the view that interests of justice would be met if respondent No.1 is directed to dispose of representation, dated 01.11.2008 submitted by the petitioner and if he finds that there are no valid reasons for respondent No.2 to withhold the monetary remunerations and the service register of the petitioner, he shall direct respondent No.2 to release the same forthwith. If on the other hand, he finds that the action of respondent No.2 is justified, he shall put the petitioner on notice and pass appropriate order thereafter. He shall complete this exercise within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.10281 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 18th APRIL, 2009. kvni