1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3860 OF 2009 Mr. Janardhan Ramkrishna Mhatre. ... Applicant. V/s. Mrs. Sulochana Janardhan Mhatre & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. J.C. Patil for the Applicant. Ms. S.V. Gajare, APP for the Respondent. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 20th JANUARY 2010. P.C. :- No case is made out for the interference with the order passed by the Courts below awarding maintenance to the wife. The concurrent order does not suffer from any error apparent or perversity. Merely because the Applicant would urge before the Courts below that the parents of the wife are likely to be allotted the plots by CIDCO which are worth Rs. 1.00 Crore, that cannot be a ground to hold that the wife has source of income and that she is able to maintain herself. There are neither any documents produced nor there is any proof that the wife is having any independent source of income. The proceedings are under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. for maintenance. This is not a fit case for interference, the Application is dismissed. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)