IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.558 of 2009 Date of decision:24.03.2009 Amardeep Kaur and others ...Petitioners versus Rajinder Kaur and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr.Vikrant Oberoi, Advocate for the petitioners. 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. Revision is against an order dismissing an application for injunction sought at an interlocutory stage. The Appellate Court affirmed the said finding. 2. I do not think the order suffers from any legal infirmity to be susceptible for modification in revision, having regard to the factual contentions relating to possession considered by the Courts below. The suit is of the year, 2005 and the adjudication is in respect of an immovable property. Having regard to the conflicting claims of parties on either side, it is only expedient that the case is taken up at the earliest and disposed of on merits. Even while dismissing the revision, it is requested that the trial Court takes up the matter in the list and dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six months. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 24.03.2009 sanjeev