THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.8040 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner purchased plot No.17, admeasuring 267 yards, situated at Nagole Village, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, through sale deed, dated 26.10.1994. This is part of layout sanctioned by the erstwhile Nagole Village of Hayathnagar Mandal. He constructed a compound wall, around the plot. In the recent past, the village became initially part of Uppal Municipality, and thereafter, the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation. The respondents made an attempt to demolish the compound wall of the petitioner. The same is challenged in this writ petition. On behalf of respondents 1 to 3, a counter-affidavit is filed, stating that the plot said to have been purchased by the petitioner, was shown as a park in the layout, and in that view of the matter, the compound wall was demolished. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3. The petitioner is traced out his title to his vendor and vendor’s vendor. The fact remains that the plot was purchased through a sale deed, dated 26.10.1994. At that time, it was part of Grampanchayat. The only ground, on which, the respondents sought to proceed against the petitioner’s plot is that, it is shown as park in the layout. A certified copy of the lay out is placed before this Court. Except the roads, no other open place is mentioned. Plot No.17, which is shown as 267 square yards, is described as park. It is not known as to whether this description was made, while sanctioning the layout, or thereafter. Be that as it may, the question of plot number being shown as an open area earmarked for park, does not arise. Assuming that there was any illegality on the part of the Grampanchayat in sanctioning such layout, the remedy for the respondents is elsewhere and the petitioner cannot be made to suffer. Hence, the Writ Petition is allowed, and the respondents shall not interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner with plot No.17. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated:19.11.2009 GJ