IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2010 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 11095 of 2010(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M/S.GOLDEN ALUMINIUM CENTRE, 40/8224, SAHARA LODGE BUILDING, CONVENT ROAD, ERNAKULAM REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, AHRAF A. BY ADV. SRI.K.J.ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, III CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM. 3. INSPECTING ASST.COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.V.K.SHAMSUDHEEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ------------------------ W.P.(C)No. 11095 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 31st day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Challenging Ext.P1 assessment order, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal along with Ext.P2(a) petition for stay (the same has been wrongly described in the index of the writ petition as a petition for early posting) before the second respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that it is without any regard to the pendency of the above proceedings, that Ext.P3 demand notice has been issued by the 3rd respondent. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the second respondent is directed to consider and pass final orders on Ext.P2 (a) petition for stay in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that till such time orders are passed on Ext.P2(a), all further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P3 shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. dpk