IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 11583 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 02nd December, 2011. Mamta Rani Petitioner through Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate Versus Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra & Ors. Respondents through Mr. R.S.Rana, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner who got 48.2% marks in M.A., appeared in the Joint Entrance Test conducted by the Kurukshetra University for admission to B.Ed. Course. She was treated eligible and allowed to appear in the Entrance Test and based upon her merit, was admitted to B.Ed. Course in respondent No. 3 College. The petitioner's admission has been cancelled when she was near to completion of the Course on the plea that as per the eligibility conditions in the Admission Brochure, she was required to have at least 50% marks in M.A. The aggrieved petitioner has approached this Court. Vide order dated 12.07.2011, the petitioner was permitted to take examination provisionally and subject to the decision of this writ petition. The petitioner has already appeared in the examination pursuant to the said order and her result has also been declared. True it is that the terms and conditions contained in an Admission Brochure carry the force of law and can not be relaxed unless there is an express provision and/or the Competent Authority takes a conscious decision in this regard. Similarly, the principle of deemed relaxation can not be invoked if the beneficiary is found guilty of concealment of facts. But here is a totally otherwise case. The respondent University does not even whisper in its reply that the petitioner concealed her academic qualifications or the percentage of her marks. She was treated eligible, allowed to appear in the Entrance Test and was granted admission by the University. It is now too late for the University to thrive upon its own negligence. For the reasons aforementioned, the writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to regularize the admission of the petitioner. Rest of the consequences shall also follow. Disposed of. Dasti. December 02, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE