SBCWP No.3964/2008 Sankar Lal Vs. Civil Judge (SD), Jaitaran & Ors. 1 SBCWP No.3964/2008 Sankar Lal Vs. Civil Judge (SD), Jaitaran & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 7.1.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Amitabh Acharaya, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The application of Rajesh was allowed by the court below filed under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC. The application submitted due to death of plaintiff Hukmi Chand who died on 18th April, 2000 and with the plea that deceased Hukmi Chand in his life time executed a registered Will in favour of said applicant and bequeathed his all movable and immovable properties to the applicant, therefore, applicant is legal representative of plaintiff. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the applicant Rajesh is not legal representative of plaintiff Hukmi Chand and as applicant's father already went in adoption, therefore, he could not have got any share in the SBCWP No.3964/2008 Sankar Lal Vs. Civil Judge (SD), Jaitaran & Ors. 2 property. It appears that the trial court has considered the facts in detail and, thereafter, reached to the conclusion that there is no reason to disbelieve the Will executed by Hukmi chand which was executed as back as in the year 1978, which is registered one also. I do not find any reason for taking a different view than the view taken by the court below. Hence, there is no merit in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-