CR No. 7228 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 7228 of 2010 (O&M) Decided on : 08-11-2010 M/s General Engineering Works ....Petitioner VERSUS Haryana Urban Development Authority ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the petitioner. MAHESH GROVER, J After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered opinion that the revision petition can be disposed of at this stage without issuance of notice of motion to the other side as resorting to this process is likely to delay the proceedings further. The grievance of the petitioner is that the statement of PW1 was recorded but he could not cross examine the said witness and on one date when the matter was fixed for the said purpose, the witness in question suffered a fracture preventing the petitioner from cross- examining him. It is his contention that if only one opportunity is granted to him, he will cross-examine the said witness in order to enhance his case. Upon hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court finds merit in the contention so raised before this Court. Accordingly, the revision petition is disposed of with a direction that the Trial Court shall CR No. 7228 of 2010 (O&M) 2 afford the petitioner one effective opportunity on the date fixed or on any other date and permit the petitioner to cross-examine the said witness. No further opportunity shall be granted to the petitioner under any circumstance. To ensure equitable justice, the impugned order is set aside subject to Rs.5,000/- as costs. Disposed of. November 08, 2010 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge