...1... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2307 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO.2307 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO.2307 OF 2003 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.11939 OF 2001 APPEAL ST.NO.11939 OF 2001 APPEAL ST.NO.11939 OF 2001 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Ms Urmila Sanil i/b M/s.A.Mehta Laljee & Co. for the Applicant Mr.Y.N.Pendse i/b Mr.D.M.Gupte for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: AUGUST 1, 2006. AUGUST 1, 2006. AUGUST 1, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates for the parties. In view of the averments made in the application, a case for restoration is made out. The Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 states that the impugned Judgment and Award in the First Appeal is already implemented. Considering the delay in preferring this application, the Applicant will have to pay costs to the Respondent Nos.2 and 3. 2. Hence, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) subject to the condition of the Applicant paying costs of Rs.2,500/- to the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 within a period of six weeks from today. Payment of costs will be a condition precedent. ...2... Judge. Judge. Judge.