CWP 442 of 2002. 29.4.2008 Present: Mr. Surinder Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. B.C.Negi, counsel for respondent No. 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner in a representative capacity bringing to the notice of this Court the irregularities in the Himachal Road Transport Corporation Employees General Provident Fund as well as Himachal Road Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund maintained by the respondents. One of the prayers in the writ petition was that respondent No. 1 be directed to deposit all the outstanding amounts of its shares in Himachal Road Transport Corporation Employees’ General Provident Fund and Himachal Road Transport Corporation Employees’ Pension Fund including the amounts as detailed in Annexures PE and PF which are the balance sheets of the Himachal Road Transport Corporation General Provident Fund Trust as on 31.3.2001, both these documents being not disputed by the respondents. By order dated May 1, 2007, this Court had directed that the respondents will place on record an affidavit stating the exact date on which the amount will be deposited in the General Provident Fund Trust Account and as -2- to whether this amount has been encumbered by any debts or not. Pursuant thereto, affidavit of Shri Ranjeet Singh Jaswal, son of late Sh. Ram Singh Jaswal, Regional Manager, Himachal Road Transport Corporation has been filed and it states: “1. That the liability of HRTC to GPF trust account is Rs.23.40 Crore as on 31.7.2007. 2. That it has been decided by the Respondent corporation to liquidate the existing liability by depositing an amount of Rs.3.00 Crore per month to GPF Trust regularly and entire liability will be discharged by the end of June, 2008. 3. That no loan has been raised by the HRTC against the FDR’s pertaining to GPF Trust. 4. That the contents of Paras 1 to 3 of this affidavit are true and correct as per information received from the official record and nothing has been concealed therefrom.” In view of this undertaking furnished by respondent No. 1, which is accepted by this Court, the grievance made by the petitioner does not survive. A direction is issued that respondent No. 1 shall abide by the undertaking furnished in the affidavit. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. All pending applications shall stand disposed of. April 29, 2008(PC). (Dev Darshan Sud), J.