IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43056 of 2010 1. TINKU MAHTO 2. RAM SHRESTH MAHTO @ RAM SHRESTH PRASAD ------------------------------- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 7.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Showing no involvement in the incident about blaming the informant for committing theft of Upendra Mahto’s Mobile, petitioners are shown abusing in name of informant’s caste Chamar. Abuse on their behalf is denied with further submission that it was to humiliate is no where mentioned constituting the offence under section 3(i)(x) of S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in Kanhauli P.S. Case No. 14/2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)