IN THE HIGH'COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR ‘V‘ WRIT PETITION [ S _)NO.’$Q§\ _ OF 2010 S ars ratlv Stores L1m1ted Balkunthpur ‘Pos aJkunthur orea C PIOR ETITNE : Vrsus e / 1‘ out asern oale lmlte trough 1ts Managm 1rector Slpat Road D1str1c laspur CG Gl M, B f h E C L S (). RS ESPONDENT : enera anager ajkunthpur Area o Sout astern oalfields imited, Post aunthu Di r Bikpr, strict arguja CG 3. /h (NCDC) Cairman, mloee onsumer ooperatve Stores Ltd., Pos aikuntur, District Saruj CG SL EC . EI RRTICE 26 OFiTH STITUTION ‘OF' INDI‘ X / Bansh1dhar Dubey, S/o R Dubey, aged about 57 y :wClerk R/o NCDC Co opee ' ~t Ip D1str1ct K (G) Sh Et ’ Clflds Ld h g D t Bl () 2; I’ Epys C Ci t Bhp ga ()- WRIT PTITON UNDEAL 2 Er CON A WW wwwm mm (Wu) mmw mwm mmm WW‘3wW éien‘mm v 83: Hon’blo £lui Maniadm Mo sh: r J. ’ 12.8.2010 Shu' Shashank Thakur &. S the petitioner. Shri Vivck Verma, conned ft Heard on admission: Learned counsel for..thc petition was mfd by the ”petiu' grievance that appropriate pay been abscrbed. Vida Older da 1994,, this Court gmnted‘ rlib respondent- authority to, consid months mm the date o£ mceipt with law bypassing speaung o ' -As the petiiionéi' could not er mpmsentaiion within'the time, o. su'pulated, anothor application s king extension of time was nbd, - which was m§stered as M.C.C. N 248i05,/whercin, the petitioner was ' ~ granted liberty to make represen non to the ooneemed authorit'es Wlthm a penod of 15 days mm Februaxy 2008 The glevance of the pounon in this petition 1s that though the penuoncr submitted repmsentati n Wuhm the stipulated period as hri Varunwdaa Mishm, counsel for m the mspondents, on advance copy. has not been gmnted, nor he hm ’5 19.7.2005 passed in W.P.24?3 of to thclpctmoner and directed repmsentation Within av-period of 3 the representation innaoéoxdanoe date of passing of the Merrie. 1“,. > e o r t e e ni' ; ‘ f f mm F1 200 mW (may m am fz‘aia? ammm mmm #2, WW wW $ aimm ‘ jb’ Praveen md'emd by this Court‘on 1“ Februmy, same has not been decided by the Learned counsel for respon *on advance ‘copy, submits that moved by the petitioner Within th Fepruaxy, 2008 in M.C.C. No.2 aceoidance with‘law. 0n such submission made, “It'is made clear that this Co the men'ts ofthe case. Fen. i : 2008 in M.C.C. No.248/05Jh‘e mspondents. a113, who has .ememd appearance ’ such a repmsenmnon has been time stipulated in cider dated 1“ 05, the same aha“ be decided in 1 e pen‘tion is mally disposed on. has not expmssed any opinion on > Sd/— \R' Manindra Mohan Shrivastraj/aJ? Judge Q.