^.v IN THE HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR rC.G^ W.P.fS^NO. ^3L/i /2QQq -®? PETITIONER w^y. ^^s^ ^yy' '<'^- ~^'" Satish Kumar Kumbhkar, aged about 66 years, S/o Shri Ghurau Ram Kun^kar, Retired Head Master, R/o Village Kumharpara, Maruti Ward no. 11 Kawardha Distt. Kawardha (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1, 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) The collector Kabirdham/ Kawardha (C.G.) Block Education Officer Kawardha, Distt. Kawardha (C.G;) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA 3. 4. -. -_L.. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETSTJON Satish Kumar Kumbhkar 1 [umane Versus State of C.G. and others fyWii Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution of india) SinaSe Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. :- Snri D. N. Prajapatl, counsel for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, D©putyGovt. Advocate for th®State. ORALORDER (Passed on this 18th day of September, 2009] Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on Instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make representation before the concerned authorities in the light of decision of the Supreme Court in the matter of St&te of Tripura and oth&rs vs. K. K. Rov£. Thereafter, the same was referred and followed in several decisions of this Court. (2) Shri Bhatia. iearned Depufy Govt. Advocate submits that if a representation is made. the same shafl be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possibie, preferabiy within a period of six weeks. (3) in view of foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn v^ith iiberty as prayed for. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge IAIR 2004 SC 1249