IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35017 of 2010 ARUN KUMAR SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4 3.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and Mr. Syed Firoz Raza, learned counsel for the complainant. Petitioner is alleged for causing cruelty for demand of dowry is replied that petitioner was a widower and complainant married with one Devanand, without divorcing him she married this petitioner, gave birth to two children also. How this relation can be defined is not the stage to consider but may never be named of wife and husband because of reason that remaining unmarried of couple is condition precedent for marriage otherwise also demand in discussed prevailing circumstance may never be accepted at the stage of anticipatory bail even. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount 2 each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, East Muzaffarpur, in Complaint Case No. 378 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)