IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID MONDAY, THE 22ND AUGUST 2011 / 31ST SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22790 of 2011(W) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. V.K.ABDUL RAHIMAN, PARTNER,M/S.PERINGATTU AGENCIES, DOOR NO.XVII/431,N.H. BYE PASS, ALUVA 683 101. 2. S.SANKARA IYER, PARTNER,M/S.PERINGATTU AGENCIES, DOOR NO.XVII/431,N.H. BYE PASS, ALUVA 683 101. 3. M/S.PERINGATTU AGENCIES, DOOR NO.XVII/431, N.H. BYE PASS,ALUVA 683 101, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, V.K.ABDUL RAHIMAN. BY ADV. MR.P.RAVINDRAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE MS.APARNA RAJAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. ALUVA MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE,PUMP JUNCTION, ALUVA 684101. 2. THE SECRETARY, ALUVA MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE,PUMP JUNCTION, ALUVA 684101. ADV.MR.V.M.KURIAN, SC FOR RESPONDENTS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 22790 of 2011(W) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COMMUNICATION DTD. 18.4.2011. EXT.P2: ORDER OF THE INJUNCTION ORDER DTD. 20.4.2011. EXT.P3: NOTICE ISSUED BY THE MUNICIPALITY DTD. 26.4.2011. EXT.P4: ORDER OF THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD DTD. 31.5.2011. EXT.P5: INTERIM ORDER DTD. 28.6.2011 IN W.P.(C).NO.16076/2011. EXT.P6: ORDER OF THE MUNICIPALITY DTD. 29.6.2011. EXT.P7: ORDER IN R.P.NO.508/2011 DTD. 12.7.2011. EXT.P8: LICENCE FEE RECEIPTS ISSUED DTD. 1.3.2000. EXT.P8(a): LICENCE FEE RECEIPTS ISSUED DTD. 1.3.2000. EXT.P8(b): LICENCE FEE RECEIPTS ISSUED DTD. 8.2.2001. EXT.P8(c): LICENCE FEE RECEIPTS ISSUED DTD. 7.2.2002. EXT.P8(d): LICENCE FEE RECEIPTS ISSUED DTD.15.2.2003. EXT.P8(e): LICENCE FEE RECEIPTS ISSUED DTD.16.2.2004. EXT.P8(f): LICENCE FEE RECEIPTS ISSUED DTD.28.2.2005. EXT.P8(g): LICENCE FEE RECEIPTS ISSUED DTD.15.2.2008. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL ..... // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.22790 Of 2011 ---------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of August, 2011. J U D G M E N T Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioners and learned standing counsel for respondents. 2. The writ petition is filed seeking to quash Ext.P3 order. 3. When the matter was taken up for admission today, it is submitted at the Bar that the petitioners challenged Ext.P3 order in appeal and the appeal is pending before the Municipal Council. For the above said reason, this Court is not called upon to consider the legality of Ext.P3 order at this stage. There will be a direction to the Municipality to consider and pass appropriate orders on the appeal preferred by the petitioners challenging Ext.P3 order. All further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P3 shall be kept in abeyance till the disposal of the appeal. The writ petition is disposed of as above. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-