1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7250 OF 2009 Manohar s/o Ramkrishna Patil & another .. PETITIONERS VERSUS Yashwant Baliram Patil & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. V.P. Patil, advocate for the petitioners. Mr. L.V. Sangeet, advocate for respondent nos 1 to 3. CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 23 rd AUGUST, 2010. PER COURT : 1 This petition is directed against the interlocutory order passed by the trial court re-casting the issues at the instance of the petitioners / original defendants. 2 Order has been passed by the trial court upon the consent extended by the counsel appearing for the petitioners herein / original defendants before the trial court. Considering this aspect of the matter as well as further considering the fact that the order impugned in the petition is passed at an 2 interlocutory stage of the proceeding, in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, no interference is called for. The petition is devoid of substance hence stands rejected. 3 In view of dismissal of the petition, pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE dyb/wp7250.09.odt