0 I- (ff2> ^_ INTHEHIGHCOURTOF CHHAIUSGARH^T BILASPUR WRITPETITION(S) N0 . S^^-^F 2007 PETITIONER: ..»~s yW ^a^ ^%v .i-y.-K; )i -..<tS.<.\}.-''1 'v-<s\y y^^> ^".^' ..••''' imrit Lal Paikara , S/o- Shri Umend Singh Paikara , Aged About-42 years Occupation- Presently Working as Senior Guide, in the department of Culture And^ . J),^-6,^£heolo^ical Jagdalpur^ g_^G.), R/o- Village- Banjari, Post- Kothari, Distt. Korba (C.G.) <i<is~'\<? X1' VERSUS RESPONDENTfS): .^ < State of Chhattisgarh . Through It's Secretary Department of Culture And Archeological, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) .r^'i " bnawan Kaipur |L..<j.| ..-y^\/l ^ .z. t\\\^ y,\ ^ Jc'^' ^Director (Commissioner), Department of Culture and Archeological, Mahant Ghashidas Shmarak Sangrahalaya, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTION / ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE. • * 1 :«+.! < II IKi ?-^];^ S' '^^[i;^'; ! SIB: Li;' ^as- RESPONDENTS HsBSSSBSK? SBS8BISE8 iS: VSSiSSS1' USBff^' ;%^. HIGHCOURTOF CMHATTISGARMATBIl-ASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) Writ Petition (S) No.3792of 2007 SSIIS VERSUS Amrit Lal Paikara State of Chhattisgarh and another Shri Vinay Pandey courisel for the petitioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava PLfor the respondents/State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260FTHE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA ORDER (27.8.2010) Grievance of the petitioner is that he is working as Guidein th^ department of Culture and Archeology since 1990 but till dat^ has not been considered for promotion to the post of Curator. In this petition the following reliefs have been sought for: 7.1 7.2 7.3 That the petitioner above named most respectfull^ prays to his Hon'bel Court to call for entire records. That the petitioner above named most respectfully prays to this Hon'ble Court for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondent competent authority to constitute Departmental Promotion Committee forconsidering the name of the petitioner tti the post of Curator. 1 That the petitioner most humbly and respectfully prays to this Hon'ble Couri: to issue a writ of mandamu^ directing the respondent competent authority to grant Promotion to the petitioner in the post of Curator w.e.fj 1.10.2003 with all consequential benefits along witH suitable interest. \ 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the return filed by the State Government wherein it has been stated by the State that Departmental Promotion Committee has already been constituted orl 07.02.2009 and thereafter the same has been revised.on 02.07.2009, th0 aaii' 111t" w- ""--r iBIK!;1; ;38Bil: IK -2--' .: -: ' '. ::;, ' ; 1:^-— present petition can be disposed ofwith a direction to the respQndents;tct consider the case of the petitioner for promotion whenever the D.P.C.iit convened. The learned State counsel very fairly submits that whenevelt the D.P.C. is convened, the case of the petitioner for promotion to post of Curator from that of Guide would be considered in accordance with law. 3. In view of the above submission of the petitioner andthe respondents, nothing sun/ives in the petition to be adjudicated. Ag assured by the counsel for the State, the case of the petitioner foc promotipn is expected to be considered whenever the next D.P.C. i^ convened. From the pleadings of the parties it appears that since 2003 nci D.P.C. has been convened for promotion to the post of Curator from that of Guide though the posts of Curator are lying vacant. It is expected front theauthorities fo convene the next D.P.C. as early as possible. I 4. In the terms mentioned above the petition is disposed of. S&l- priun^1 iudfee lat IBS 1 ai Klsf:. KSi f 3SSS i:ii ^•••: