1 cra347-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 347 OF 2010 M/s. Alfa Engineering Co. .. Applicant V/s. Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents .... Mr. D. S. Sawant i/b. Mr. Rajesh Parab for the applicant. Ms. K. K. soraan for respondent No.1-BMC. .... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 15, 2011. P.C. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Applicant is the original plaintiff. By the impugned order, the Chamber Summons taken out by third parties in suit filed by the revision applicant has been made absolute and third parties have been ordered to be impleaded as the parties to the suit. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant placed reliance upon a decision of the Apex Court in the case of Shiv Shakti Cooperative Housing Society, Nagpur v/s. Swaraj Developers 2 cra347-10 & Ors (2003) 6 SCC 659. 3. Even if present Revision Application is allowed, it will not amount to final disposal of the suit. The Chamber Summons is a proceeding in a suit. If this Revision Application is allowed, at highest it will dispose of the Chamber Summons, but not the suit. Therefore, the submission that revision is maintainable cannot be accepted. Hence, Revision Application is not maintainable and the same is rejected by keeping the remedy of the applicant open. 4. Ad-interim relief granted earlier is continue for a period of six weeks from today. JUDGE