IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 11184 of 2011 Date of decision November 21, 2011 Krishan Kumar ....... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. S. S. Slar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Kirti Singh, DAG., Haryana for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. R. K. Malik, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohan Lal, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?No 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?No K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The State has filed the reply. It is stated that the papers have been transmitted to the Chief Conservator of Forest. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Appellate Authority is Conservator of Forest and the Revisional Authority is Chief Conservator of Forest. The matter shall therefore be decided only by the Conservator of Forest, Gurgaon. The State shall entrust the papers to the Conservator of Forest who will take a decision within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. 2. The amount of `25,000/- deposited by the petitioner as security for costs is permitted to be withdrawn by the petitioner. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 21, 2011 archana