1 AO 7/1999 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.7/1999 1) Indersingh s/o Sajansingh Jain and others. - APPELLANTS (Orig.Plaintiffs/ Appellants) VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra and others. - RESPONDENTS (Orig. Defendants/ Respondents) ***** Mr.KJ Ghute-Pail, AGP for State. ----- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 21st NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : 1) By order dated 29th August, 2011, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants informed that the appellants have discharged him and learned counsel has given No objection to his clients. This is even indicated to the Registry. Consequently, Advocate Shri Kasliwal was discharged. 2) The appellants have not made any alternate arrangement in spite of conscious 2 AO 7/1999 knowledge of discharge of their advocate, the matter is dragged for no reasons. Reference of RCA No.7/1997 was given in the proceedings. A report was called pursuant to the directions of this Court dated 29th August 2011, which illustrate, RCA No.7/1997 was between Govind Nivrutti Thorat Vs. Laxmibai w/o Govindrao Thorat and disposed of on 28.9.2001. Regular Civil Appeal No.89/1998 was between Indersingh Jain and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. And the said RCA is disposed of on 29.8.2002. Consequently, it is apparent, nothing survives in the matter. The Appeal from Order with CA No. 532/1999 disposed of. Rule discharged. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/