1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:24.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD)No.3458 of 2011 D.Anbu Sezhian ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The state of Tamil Nadu, rep.by its Secretary, Education Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director, Directorate of Elementary Education, Chennai-600 006. 3.The District Elementary Education Officer, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai. ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 03.01.2011. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Velmurugan For Respondents : Mr.V.Rajasekaran Spl.Govt.Pleader ****** ORDER Mr.V.Rajasekaran, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition to direct the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 03.01.2011. The petitioner states that the Government of Tamil Nadu has passed a G.O.Ms.No.100 dated 27.06.2003 wherein it has ordered to appoint the persons who have completed the B.Ed., course in the classes from 6th to 10th in all schools of Tamil Nadu. The second respondent has issued proceedings dated 26.12.2000 whereby he has recommended to give permission to those teachers, who belong to schedule castes and who had originally completed B.Ed., but joined in the secondary grade assistant. The petitioner is entitled to the benefits granted under G.O.Ms.No.100 dated 27.06.2003. Therefore, he sent a representation dated 03.01.2011 to the second respondent to give him promotion and also to re-fix the salary from 27.06.2003, as per the G.O. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 referred to above. The second respondent has received the representation dated 10.01.2011, but he has not passed any order sofar. Ttherefore, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present Writ Petition. 3. Considering the limited scope of the matter and the claim made by the petitioner, I direct the second respondent to consider the said representation, namely, 03.01.2011, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In fine, the Writ Petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (L.A) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Secretary, The state of Tamil Nadu, Education Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director, Directorate of Elementary Education, Chennai-600 006. 3.The District Elementary Education Officer, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai. + 1 cc to Mr.P.Velmurugan, Advocate, SR No.7735 + 1 cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR No.8238 W.P.(MD)No.3458 of 2011 24.03.2011 ssm RJ/7.4.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/