c^^ Stjigte B©ne1 IN THE HIGHCOURTOPCHHATnSGARHATBILASPUR WRIT PETmON (Sl N0. M 15^ OF 2011 PETJTIONER .rl/\^1- ^\.^w-"" ^\^^ f^> 'V ,^;^^'v' ^"" . .-•' RESPONDENTS CJaaiidrika Prasad Dubey S/o Late Shri Jagannath Prasad Dubey, aged about 59 years, Occupatlon- Ser^ice^ Posted as Deputy Ranger, Suwarguda Range Sarangarh, R/o. Forest Coloiij Saraiigarh, Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1.^ State of Chhattisgarh, throu^i Secretary, Forest Department Department, D. K. S. Buildin-g Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.). 2.' Collector, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Divisional Forest Officery Forest Division Raigarh, Distt.- Raigarh (C.G4 ^•••"l" 4. RegiQnal Forest OfEcer, Forest Re^ion Sarangarh, Distt.- Raigarh ( C.O.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF mDIA _J^3Lawfc^3k3^^ ^L^-l—— //-^ (te^J '"':-. '^<-^ ^£s&^ HKjH.COURT OF Cm-IATTISGAT<H AT BILASPUR WRn PETmgN_(Sl^No, 4l35,of 2011 P.ETIT10NER : Chandrika Prasad Dubey. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State of'Clihattisgarh & Others. Amit WRIT PEITI'ION ITNDER ART1CLE 226 OF THE CONSIITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel La^er for the State/respondents. ORDER1QRAL) (Passed on 10A day ofAugust, 2011) 1. Challengc in this petition is to the order dated 15.07.2011 (AmiGKWG P/l) whereby, the petitioner, workmg as Deputy Ranger at Suwarguda, has been transferred to Tamnar, Distriet Raigarh, on administrative grounds. 2. SM Sahu, leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that o.nly 10 months are left for s'aperannuation of the petitioner as he is going to rctire on 31,05.2012, and at fhis stage, trarisferring the petitioner from his preseiit placc ofpostmg is unjustified and contrary to the transfer policy ofthe State. Thus.the same may be quashed. 3. Sliri Thakur, leamed Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/ respondents sufemits fhat if a representation is made by the petitioner raising liis grievances for quashing ofthe impugned transfer order, as stated above, the same shall be considered within a period of 10 days trom the date ofreceipt ofthe representation. 4, Iii view of the above, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent authorities raising ail his grievances within a period of one week, and thereafter, the respondent authorities shall consider and decide the same within a farther period of 10 days. It is further directed that ti.il any decision on the representation ofthe petitioner is taken, status quo as obtains today in respect of the p.1acement ofthe petitioner shall b©maintained, 5. With the aforesaid obseivation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge