2Q HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT B]LASPUR Writ Petition No. 225D of 2095 1. Mr. GS. Agrawai, learned Senior counsel with Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, iearned counsei appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. V.V.S. Murthy. learned Deputy Advocate Genera} with Mr. Sushii Dubey, learned Govt. Advocate jointly submit that the facts and question of Iaw involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in WP. No. 443211 996 (Vidya Shankar Tiwari Vs. State of MP. (Now State of Chhattisgarh) and others) 2006 (2) M.P.H.T. 31 (CG), which has been allowed vide order dated 23.12.2005. Petitioner ishwar Prasad Kashyap, S/o. $hri Kashi Ram Kashyap, Aged about 65 years, House No. 5, Vivekanand Ward‘ Nawagaon, (Vin. & Post) Katghora Tahsii, Korba Dist. C.G. State. Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Education Department, Government of Chhattisgaih, DKS Bhawan, Raipur. 2. Director, Education, Govt. of C.G. Raipur C.G. State. 3. Jt. Director, Treasury Accounts & Pension, Biiaspur Division, Biiaspur C.G. State. WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION §§ : Hon’bie Justice Shri Satish K. Aqnihotri Present: Mr. G.S. Agrawai, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.V.S. Murthy, Deputy Advocate Generai with Mr. Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the respondente Q R D E R (Passed on this 7‘“ day of May, zoo-r), h) /-~,\ 2. In View of the above stated submission niade by Ieamed counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is ailowed in the same terms. The impugned orders Annexure’ P/1 Annexure P/2 and Annexure P13 are quashed and the respondents are directed to refund the amount if any recovered pursuant to the orders Annexure P/1 Annexure P/2 and Annexure P/3 from the petitioner This order shall not come m the way of the respondentslauthonties to take any action if so advrsed against the officer who are responSibie for making l payments if any to the petitioner concerned. No order as to costs. SdL Satish K Agnihotri i Judge . \«3