IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11712 of 2011 RANDHIR YADAV @ RANDHIR KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 04.05.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner renews his prayer for anticipatory bail as a suspect for conspiracy in a case under Sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Penal Code. Counsel for the State rightly objects that on the previous occasion anticipatory bail was declined for antecedents. The position remains the same. It is next pointed out from Para 21 of the supplementary case diary that a witness, an accused in the custody, had made a disclosure of the conspiracy hatched by the petitioner through Bablu Yadav and Pramod Yadav for doing away with the deceased. The Court considers the aforesaid sufficient not to re-consider the prayer for anticipatory bail.. The application stands dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)