IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.90 OF 2010. (SAU RADHA MUKUND DESHMUKH....VS..MUKUND MADHUSUDAN DESHMUKH) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mrs.U.A. Patil, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Francis Karayil, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 27, 2010. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. On perusal of the orders passed by this Court it appears that the respondent had handed over a demand draft for an amount of Rs.3,50,000/-, drawn on Axis Bank, Chandrapur, to the learned counsel for the appellant, on behalf of the appellant. The appellant had not vacated the house of the respondent, though that was one of the terms stated in Annexure-Z. It is informed to the Court by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has vacated the house of the respondent along with her belongings. It is informed to this Court that all the terms and conditions of the settlement at Annexure-Z have been complied with. This Court had already asked the parties who were present in the Court on 2nd July, 2010, whether they were ad-idem over the terms and conditions of the settlement at Annexure-Z. They had answered in the affirmative and it appears that all the terms of the settlement, as stated by the learned counsel for the parties, have been complied with. In view of the same, the second appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise at Annexure-Z. The decree be drawn accordingly. JUDGE RR.