IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI FRIDAY, THE 15TH JANUARY 2010 / 25TH POUSHA 1931 WP(Crl.).No. 443 of 2009(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SIVARAMAN P.P., PADINJAREPARAMBIL HOUSE, PALLIPPURAM P.O., PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.B.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (LAW & ORDER), POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUPT. OF POLICE, PALAKKAD. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATTAMBI POLICE STATION. 4. IBRAHIM, NOORMAJID SHOPPING COMPLEX, SHOP NO.3, GEETHA CAMP, TROMBAY, MUBAI-88. 5. RAFEEK, EDAMANATHODI HOUSE, PALLIPPURAM P.O., PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.P.T.DINESH FOR R5 SMT.REKHA VASUDEVAN FOR R5 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI P.N.SUKUMARAN FOR R1 TO 3 SRI.P.M.MOHAMMED SHIRAZ FOR R4 SMT.G.R.MANJU FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH & P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(Crl.) 443 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------------------ Dated: JANUARY 15, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. This is a writ petition filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to produce the girl before this court. A direction is further sought to conduct investigation on the basis of the complaint by the petitioner to conduct investigation. 2. We heard the learned counsel for the parties. 3. In brief the case of the petitioner is that the petitioner's daughter is missing and that she was kidnapped by the 4th respondent and it is further stated that her whereabouts are known only to the 5th respondent. A complaint is filed before the police, it is alleged. 4. The alleged detenu had been produced on 7.1.2010 as ordered and we have passed an interim order on the said day. We have interacted with the detenu and also the 4th respondent who were produced by the police. We have taken note of her statement that she has converted to Islam and that she had married the 4th respondent. We directed a counter affidavit to be brought on record by the 4th respondent. A counter affidavit has been brought on record by the 4th respondent. He has produced Exts.R4(a) and R4(b). Ext.R4 (a) purports to be a true copy of the marriage register extract of WP(Crl.) 443/09 2 Jamiyyathu Ahllil Qur'an Wal Hadhees Masjid, Salem District. It is submitted that the marriage was solemnized in accordance with the Shari-Ath on 14.1.2010. The alleged detenu is a major. She is aged 25. In the light of the facts as aforesaid, we find that we need not allow the petitioner to pursue with the writ petition. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed. K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JUDGE mt/-