IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 6507 of 2009 Between: Vijay Ramakrishna S/o. P. Ramakrishna R/o. 10-3-28, East Marredpally, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Rep. by the Assistant Director, Veterinary Section North Zone, West Marredpally Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to a writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in trying to dispossess the six dogs from the custody of the petitioner inspite of there being a license for the said dogs is arbitrary illegal, and consequently direct the respondent to refrain from interfering with the possession of six dogs by the petitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.M.R.VELU Counsel for the Respondent No.: R.RAMACHANDRA REDDY,SC FOR MCH 1,2,4&6 The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no lis to be adjudicated in this writ petition and the matter has become infructuous. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 21st April, 2009 Note: Furnish copy by tomorrow B/o bcj