HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRL.P.No.1021 of 2008 ORDER: Petitioner seeks quashing of the order passed in Crl.R.P.No.40 of 2007 dated 21.11.2008 on the file of the II Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Adilabad. 1st respondent, being the wife of the petitioner herein, filed the M.C.No.3 of 2005 seeking maintenance of Rs.2,000/- per month from the petitioner herein. The trial Court, after an analysis of the entire evidence available on record, dismissed the said petition by an order dated 25.06.2007. Questioning the said order, the 1st respondent herein preferred Crl.R.P.No.40 of 2007 and the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Adilabad, after re-assessing the entire evidence, allowed the said petition granting maintenance of Rs.1,000/- per month to the 1st respondent from the date of petition. Aggrieved by the same, the present criminal petition is filed by the petitioner. While ordering notice to the 1st respondent, this Court, on 21.02.2008, granted interim suspension of the impugned order subject to the condition of the petitioner depositing 50% of the arrears of maintenance, within a period of four weeks from that day and continuing to pay the maintenance of Rs.500/- per month to the 1st respondent before 15th of every succeeding month. The revisional Court has discussed the entire evidence available on record and gave a finding that the petitioner has got sufficient means to provide maintenance to the 1st respondent and accordingly granted maintenance of 1,000/- per month to the 1st respondent herein-, which, in my considered view, needs no interference. I find no merit in this petition. The Criminal Petition is accordingly dismissed. _______________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 22.04.2010 Gsn.