IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6625 of 2008 Date of decision:16.03.2009 Aarti ...Petitioner versus Jasbir alias Sonu ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Ms.Sharmila Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Malik, Advocate for the respondent. 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. In a matrimonial proceeding, petition for interim maintenance was ordered by the Court below directing Rs.400/- to be paid for the wife and Rs.250/- for the child. The Court below took notice of the fact that the respondent was stated to be earning Rs.3,000/- 2. Counsel for the petitioner states that she has small minor children to support and there is no truth in the allegation by the husband that she is working as a teacher earning Rs.5,000/- and that she has income from agriculture lands. Having regard to the nature of evidence tendered and the reasonable warrants of challenge and the order of amount of Rs.650/- comprising of Rs.400/- for the wife Rs.250/- for the child is modified and the petitioner shall be entitled to Rs.900/- comprising of Rs.600/- for the wife and Rs.300/- for the child. Subject to this modification, revision is disposed of. This enhancement shall be effective from 01.01.2009. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 16.03.2009 sanjeev