IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-13052 of 2008 Date of decision:- 10.7.2008 Daya Nand and another ...Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Ashwani Gaur, Advocate for the petitioners. RAJESH BINDAL J. The issue as regards maintainability of revision against the summoning order has already been considered by this Court in Dr. Gurpreet Kaur and another versus State of Punjab and another 2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) 285. While relying upon judgments of Hon'ble the Supreme Court, it was held that a summoning order is not interlocutory in nature as the result of setting aside thereof is culmination of proceedings in its entirety. Accordingly, the present petition challenging the summoning order cannot be entertained. Dismissed. July 10, 2008 (RAJESH BINDAL) ritu-II JUDGE