IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.605 OF 2002 Shri.Popat Ganpat Khandale ...Applicant Versus Sou.Malan Popat Khandale & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Milind Deshmukh for Applicant. Mr.A.S.Gadkari, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. APRIL 1, 2005. APRIL 1, 2005. APRIL 1, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. I see no reason to interfere with the concurrent view taken by the two Courts below for enhancing the maintenance amount. Good reason is recorded for grant of that relief to the Respondent wife. The Court below has taken into account the fact that after 1994 there has been steep increase in the salary of School teachers on account of the : 2 : Fifth Pay Commission. 3. Viewed in this perspective, enhanced maintenance amount of Rs.1,500/- (Rupees One Thousand Five Hundred) cannot be said to be excessive. Hence, dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.