1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY C RIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 268 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATGION NO.16 OF 2009 IN PETITION NO. E-393 OF 2005 Mr. Arun A. Chudnaik .. Applicant. V/s. Smt. Anita Arun Chudnaik & Anr. .. Respondent. Mr. Pravin Sawant for the Applicant. Smt. S.V. Sonawane Advocate appointed as Amicus Curiae for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A. A. SAYED , JJ. DATED : 21ST JULY, 2010. P.C. Both the parties are present in Court. They are also represented by their respective lawyers. The parties have decided to arrive at amicable settlement by resolving all their contentious issues inter se. The terms on which settlement is arrived at is reduced into writing. The written consent terms are handed in to the Court, on the basis of which, the parties are inviting final order in the pending proceedings. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The proceedings are disposed of on the basis of consent terms. The undertaking given by the applicant- 2 husband of making payment within specified time is accepted. The applicant-husband reiterates that undertaking before us. To reassure ourselves, we asked the respondent-wife as to whether she was willing to enter into the consent terms handed over to us. She has stated before us that the terms so mentioned are acceptable to her and she has signed the consent terms with full understanding. Accordingly, the marriage between the parties is dissolved by decree of divorce by mutual consent on the above basis. 2 We express our deep sense of gratitude for the able assistance given by Smt.S.V. Sonawane, as amicus curiae to espouse the cause of the respondent-wife. (A.A.SAYED,J.) (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)