[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1597 OF 2007 Vijay Bhimrao Bedekar ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.Abhaykumar Apte advocate for applicant Mr.K.V.Saste A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JUNE 18, 2007 DATE : JUNE 18, 2007 DATE : JUNE 18, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant-Vijay Bedekar is seeking anticipatory bail in respect of complaint filed by his wife under Section 498-A of IPC of Wadgaon Maval Police Station. The learned A.P.P. seeks time upto 22.6.2007 to take instructions. However, Mr.Apte, the learned advocate for the applicant states that the applicant may be protected in the meantime. In my view, the following order should meet the ends of justice: [-2-] 3. In case, the Investigating Agency is of the opinion that the custody of the applicant is necessary, they shall give him 72 hours notice prior to his arrest. It is made clear that if the notice is received by the applicant, the applicant shall prefer the necessary application for anticipatory bail before the concerned Sessions Court and the concerned Sessions Court shall hear the necessary parties and dispose of the said application on merits. 4. Application is disposed of. [Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.]