IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6397 of 2005 ***** Chakradhar Prasad Singh s/o Late Durga Prasad Singh, resident of village- Singrahiya, P.S. Sahiyara, Dist-Sitamarhi …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Collector, Sitamarhi. 3. The Accountant General, Bihar at Patna. …. …. Respondents ----------- 2. 3.3.2009. Petitioner filed the writ application because only 90% of the pension was authorized and 10% of the same was withheld but today learned counsel representing the Accountant General produces a P.P.O. No.42043 dated 4.1.2006, by virtue of which final pension has been authorized in favour of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in absence of information from his client he is not in position to rebut the statement. Keeping the authorization, a copy of which is kept on record, the grievance or the relief prayed for by the petitioner has already been granted to him. The writ application has become infructuous. It is accordingly dismissed. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)