IN THE HIGH COURT OF NATA AT BANGLORE Dated thi s the 18th day of Jur 1998 BEFORE Th HON’E MR. JUSTICE CHANDRASHARAIAH 6&1747 BETWtT 1. V. Ramaflna, 48 years, 3/0, Veflkatara!anappa, R/a, Savarlifle ;oad, Sbinrga, 2. J.M. Pinto, 58 years, 3/0. R. Pinto, Wa. Hutha Colony, Bhadravathi. 3. N.Y. iiataraj, 49 years, 3/0, e1iappa, Lala ajapathroy ad, Shinzoga. 4. B. Puradappa, 3/0. A. Basappa, B/a. Gad ikoppa 1 Shiig Tq. & Dint. 5. D.H. PUThlalika RaO, Sb. 14. Han Rao, Aged: 62 parS, Lala Lajapath0i ad, hinog City. •. PKIITIO HERS (By Sri. B. idrgowda, Adv.) AiiD 1, The Deputy Commissioner, Shimog District, Shimoga. $2: F- 2. flvpucba, $.Jor, 9’o. Veerab%dracIi, 00$ Carpenter, 3. H 4 flw%fltbeflflppa 1 Major, *0. Gangazta 0cc: Coolie, 4. Krishna @ Kitta, Wo. Qovifldappa, Major, 0cc: Coolie, 4. Parvathiaa, Major, Wo. SnaPpa, Ccc: H.!. imn & Coolie, 6. arogymn Major, tVo. Arogys4my, 000$ Coolie, R2toR6arethe R/o. gkoa., Gadikoppa Post, Shiaga TaUt. 7. Swesh, Major, 310. M.L. Banasa 11 , 0cc $ 1oye, Wo. Ciwmaj. ROad, Shimga. .. RWONDNITS (SSIDBD *3 P GOUt’ ORDER DT.U.6.1998) (By Sri. K. Ngaja, HCCW for lii, ti. 3.5. Patil & Slnbh Patti for R2tDR7) Tie petitiomrs are ffled U/a.226 & 227 of the gonstitution of India with a prayer to clash wide Ann-0 dt.27.6.1997 of the D.C., sramg 5 . 71st petitions coning on for pri. hg. in ‘B’ Group this day, the Court made tie fofloving:— :3: ORDER the petitioners have challenged the order PaSS by the Deputy Commissioner on 27.6,1997 produced as Annexur e-O directing the pe ti tio ne r and others from proceeding with the construction of the building on the site, on the ground that if the petitioners are aJJow to contirie to put up the onstruction it will lead o each of peace or ubJic tranquility However there is no iw and order proem. If there is IiI:elyhood of ek of peace or public tranquility, it is open for the Sub-ision Magistrate or the Executive Mag istrate to take appropriate aCtiOn under Sec,107 of CrP,C, But, the Deputy Comr1ssioner has no porer to pass afl order of injunction restraining the persons from proceeding with the construction, Therefore, the order inugned is wit1out the autrrIty of law. It is also ought to my notIce that the petitIoners have already filec t 1ias against some orivate persons and also said suits are pezing, 2. In the result i pass tne following order: 4, :4: The3e t’it PetitIons are allowed, The order of the Deputy Commissioner dt27,6.97 produced as Aflne xurO is quashed. However this oMer will rot cone in the WaY of taking appropriate action in order to prevent any breach of peace or puic tranquility by 3ulDivision Ma4strate or cecutive Magistrate under the provision of 4