BEFORE THE HON’BLE IGH COURT OF CHHATTIS ARH AT BILASPUR w.P(S)No. ($31Z 12010 $iN$LE BENCH WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. X4 PETITIONER : G.P. Dubey S/o. Late Girwar Prasad Dubey, aged about 54 years, S.D.O. Forest, East Surguja Forest Division, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G,) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1 The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : the Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) "Additional Secretary, Department of Forest, State of Chhattlsgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. <. S.D. Tiwari S/o. Lalla Ram Tiwari, aged about 59 years, Assistant Conservator of Forest cum Attached Officer, North Surguja Forest Division, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) mm HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 3578 OF 2010 PETITIONFR GF‘Dubey Versus RESPONDENTS Staie of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. I I‘V Present :— Shri AK. Prasad, Advocate for the petitioner. ' Sim M.P.s.3hatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 19‘“ day of July, 201 0) it} 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 9/7/2010 (Annexure P-1), whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Working Plan Circle, office of the Conservator of Forest, Bilaspur to attach Officer, North Surguja Forest Circle. Prior to this, by order dated 30/6/09 (Annexure P-Z), the petitioner- wos transferred from Attach Officer Workingi I’Ian Circle. VBilaspur as Sub Divisional Forest Officer, Dhourpur, North Surgujo against the respondent No.3. He was transferred as Sub Divisional Forest officer, Dhaurpur, North Surguja to the Attach Officer, Working Plan Circle, Bilaspur. 2. The respondent No. 3 fiied a writ petition before this Court, being W.P.(5) No. 3381/09. This Court after hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the respondent No.3 therein (present petitioner) on 13/7/097 granted a liberty to the petitioner therein (respondent No.3 in the present petition) to make a representation to the Secretary, Forest Department, State of Chhattisgarh and it was further directed to decide the representation within a period of two weeks. The respondent No.1 considered the representation of the \ M responden‘f No.3 and amended fhe order of fhe pe1'i'rioner To The effec‘i' fhu‘r in place of Sub Divisional Officer, Dhaurpur, Nor‘rh Surguja Circ!e, fhe pe'rifioner would be Transferred as Affach Officer, Nor'rh Surguja, Circie, on 09/07/2010. The learned counsel appearing for fhe pe‘rifioner submi‘rs fhm‘ fhe once The Transfer order has been execuTed no subsequen? order can be passed. This poin'r was raised in W.P.(S) No. 3381/09 by The pefi‘rioner (responden‘r No. 3, +herein), which was considered and order was passed. Thus, aii The poin‘rs raised in fhis pe‘rii'ion was fhe subjeci‘ mafi'er before fhe Courf in W.P.(S) No. 3381/09 aiso. In view of The foregoing; no subsTanTial peTiTion chailenging The impugned Transfer order pursuanT To The order passed by This CourT in W.P.(S) No. 3381/09 is mainTainabie. However, The peTiTioner may very well seek review of The order daTed 13/7/09 by filing a review peTiTion, if so advised. In view of The foregoing, The subsTanTive peTiTion is noT mainTainable and is accordingly dismissed reserving The liberTy To The peTiTioner To Take appropriaTe sTeps, if so advised in accordance wiTh law. Satish K. Agnihom ‘ Judge Sd/- ashok