IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 19514 of 1994 Between: 1 Kavvaala Mallaiah, S/op Sheemaiah, H.No.5-75, Medipalli 2 Dammala Ellaiah, s/o Pedda Narsaiah, R/o Poratpalli, Ramagundam (M), Karimnagar Dist. 3 Samnate Tirupathi, S/o Nagaiah, R/o Poratpalli, Ramagundam (M), Karimnagar Dist. 4 Dammala VEnkati, S/o Pocham, R/o Poratpalli, Ramagundam (M), Karimnagar Dist. 5 Kumari Kunta Chandraiah, S/o Narsaiah, R/o Poratpalli, Ramagundam (M), Karimnagar Dist. 6 Vemula Narayana, S/o Mallaiah, R/o Poratpalli, Ramagundam (M), Karimnagar Dist. 7 Kundarapu Ramaulu, S/o Rajam, R/o Poratpalli, Ramagundam (M), Karimnagar Dist. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli, Karimnagar Dist. 2 The Dist collector, Karimnagar. 3 General Manager, National Thermal Power Corporation Ramagundam, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue am order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the first and second respondents in not changing the nominees in favour of the sons of the petitioners for the purpose of employment in NTPC Ramagundam Karimnagar district as bad and illegal consequently direct the first respondents to include the sons of the petitioners kavvala Narsaiah, Dammala Pocham, Sammata Venkatesham, Dammala Mallesham, Kummarikunta Satyanarayana, V. Mallesham and K. Venkatesham Respectively as nominees in place of the petitioners in the land oustees list and direct the first and second respondents to send the modified list to third respondent for employment in NTPC. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.PRABHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court Made the Following ORDER: Sri P. Prabhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _____________________ B. Prakash Rao, J. 8th July, 2004 js. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1 Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli, Karimnagar Dist. 2 The Dist collector, Karimnagar. 3 General Manager, National Thermal Power Corporation Ramagundam, Karimnagar District. 4 Two CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.(OUT) 5 2 CD copies.