FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.6224 of 2006 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr P.K.Dhakhephalkar, senior counsel, i/b M/s Khilnani & Co., for the petitioner. Ms Usha Rahi, i/b Mr Valmik Acharya i/b M/s Mayur Narendra & Co, for the respondents. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATED: 19.09.2006 P.C.: Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Mr Dhakhephalkar, learned senior counsel, for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner will be satisfied if he is allowed to challenge the locus of respondent no.2-Vinodkumar Pandey, who claims to be a Constituted Attorney of Chhaganlal Vishram & Co, as and when Misc.Notices Nos 768/97, 5555/99 and 2310/91 will be heard on merits. Ms Rahi, learned counsel for the respondents,has no objection for granting such liberty. In view thereof, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. If the contention as to the locus of respondent no.2 Vinodkumar Pandey is raised, same will be considered on merits in accordance with law. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)