1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.3166 of 2008 (Malledi Vyankatreddi S/o Subbi Reddi v. State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Hingana Police Station, Nagpur) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shri A.J. Khan, Advocate for Applicant. Shri A.D. Sonak, APP for Respondent/State. CORAM : R.C. Chavan, J. DATE : 30th September, 2008 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. This is an application for bail by the applicant, who has been chargesheeted in Special Criminal Case No.225 of 2007 for offence punishable under Section 20-B of NDPS Act for being connected with transporting Ganja worth Rs.98,00,76,000/-. His earlier application for bail bearing No.1976 of 2008 was rejected by this Court. In the earlier application for bail, he had specifically made out a ground of his ill-health in para 14. Now the present application is filed on the ground that the applicant is not getting proper treatment in spite of the orders of the Trial Court to secure necessary funds for the treatment of the applicant and that the jail authorities are not taking any steps in getting the amount for the treatment of the applicant. The learned APP states that the jail authorities will take necessary steps to ensure that the applicant gets proper treatment. 2 In view of this, there is no warrant to release the applicant on bail. The application is, therefore, rejected. At this stage, the learned counsel for the applicant states that the Trial Court may be directed to complete the trial within one month. Considering that the applicant is in jail, the Trial Court shall endeavour to complete the trial as early as possible. JUDGE Lanjewar