RSA No.710 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.710 of 2010 Date of Decision:13.08.2010 Mihan Singh .... appellant Versus Gurcharan Singh & Ors. .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Ajit Attri,Advocate for the appellant **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): This is plaintiff's second appeal challenging the judgment and decrees of the courts below whereby his suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction and joint possession was dismissed. As per the averments made in the suit, defendant No.1 and Bachan Singh-husband of defendant No.2 and father of defendants No.3 to 6 got succeeded in getting a permanent lease deed executed in their favour on 18.06.1979 for 99 years by playing fraud upon the plaintiff/appellant. According to the appellant, the aforesaid sale deed was got executed by the respondents by playing fraud upon him as there was no legal necessity for him to execute the same. The courts below on the basis of evidence on record have recorded a concurrent finding of fact that appellant has failed to prove the plea of fraud as taken by him. Moreover, the lease deed(Ex.P-3) is a RSA No.710 of 2010 2 registered document which is duly endorsed by the Sub-Registrar and presumption of correctness of the endorsement made by the Sub-Registrar is available. Thus, in the absence of any evidence about fraud, no fault can be found with the finding of fact recorded by the courts below. No substantial question of law arises. Dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 13.08.2010 neenu