1 cp70.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.70 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITIONNO. 3168 OF 2010 [Shirish Prabhakar Wani vs. Baldev Singh & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. P.N. Kutti, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. D.R. Kale, AGP for State/Respondents. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 7TH JULY, 2011 PER COURT : Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. In pursuant to the notice issued in this Contempt Petition, affidavit in reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents. In para-4 of the said affidavit in reply, it is stated that the order of which disobedience is alleged in this contempt petition has been complied with. 2 cp70.11 3. It is admitted position that delay is caused in complying the order of which disobedience is alleged in this contempt petition. However, learned A.G.P. submits that the application for extension of time was submitted and the same has been rejected. The respondents in their affidavit in reply in Para-5 explained delay for complying the order. In para-2 of the said affidavit in reply, unconditional apology is tendered by the respondents. I hold that the delay caused in complying the order of which disobedience is alleged in this contempt petition, is not intentional. 4. In that view of the matter, nothing further required to be adjudicated in this contempt petition. Hence, Contempt Petition is disposed of. Notice stands discharged. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/JUL11