c/-^\-s€\- on ^ ^'aur.'c* 'urTrfn*ur WRIT PETITION (S| N0.5 f L( tf OF 2013, PE;T][TIONER ,^.^r Ramdev Lalcda, S/o Bunu Rara Lakda, aged about 47 years, presently posted arid working as Upper Division Teacher, Middle School, Jajga, Udaipur, District Sai-guja (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Departmenl. of Tribcd Welfare, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur(CG). 2. Collector, S.arguja, Ambikapur 3. Assistant Corn:tnissioner, \ Department: of Tribal Welfare, Sarguja, Anibikapur (CG). 4. Block Education Officer, Udaipur, District Sarguja f?TITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner, above named, most hurably and respectfully beg tosubmits as under: - Efeta.ils of the petition: - 1. As ineiitioned in the cause title. (^- 'iSf^•f^°"'S'i.Sltt'iiNrr >~T^Jt--^:'- .;--^i^l-J-i PETIT10NER rilSJ-i COURT OF CHHATTiSQARH : B3LAS? WRJI P=TlT!QN_(5)L_Nc,, 5144 OF 2011 Ramdsv Lakda RESPONDENT; Versus Sfate of Chhattisgarh & Otners (Wnt Petltion undsr Articie 226 of the Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satlsh K. Asnlhotri, J. 'resei't:- Shri Sanjay Patsi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. .nRnpR .'nRAi '• '•u'i\a-/i«j^ t%w^i t.f^L./ 'P?sl=.!=,-'arl r'.n th'<; H^ rj^v <^f ?^^^?ar^h; h3?S-*^ '^f\^ -^li^rt]f .^l '^'rf'^'^^rfi < i'*^^^^ ^ /<< -earned counsei appsaring tor the petitioner submits that ths pstitioner, working as Upper Divlsion Teacher at Middie Schooi, Jajga, Udaipur, Dlstrict Surauja, has fasen transferred io fte optlon of the Siock Education Officer. Ramchandrapur vide imDugned order dated 15.07.2011 fAnnexure P-1) on administrative igrounds. Shri Pstei, further submits that the wifs of ths oetitioner Is also a yovernmeni servs.nt and is working as Headmaster at Primar/ School Pandripani, Biock Udaipur. The transfer policy crf the State prescribes that as far as possible, the husband and wlfe must be gosted at the same olace. which has not been done in the instant C^SS. ; HS p^tuiOHcr OUQHt ?0 HSVS 02SH pOSTSQ 3? ?HS HSSfQSl piSCs of posting of the wife. The pstitioner made a repressntatioi 1-NiI (Annexure P-7) to the In-charge minister for posting him at Block UdaiDur. which is oendina consideration. Learned counsel spDearing for the State submits that Ifthe Detitionsr aiongwith his wife makes a ioint representation ralsing their urievancs. the sams shail be considered and decided In accordance VviZil i3W QHO OH i?3 OWn H'i-SfIXS. Wii.HiH 3 OSfiOO OT TOUi W©SKS. L^- TL^n| ii^ ^S. ^ '^-^f^ A^ 3^ ^ ?^J^.T 1 w^ .-^ .-S ^ *h, =S^3K sn vsew OT tne aisovs, acsoraing to isarnea counse! apDeanng Tor tne psSioner, nothing survives for adjudication in this petltion. AccordingSv. the writ Detition is disposed of with the sforeststed oossrvsiic'n. ' ._'-_-—-— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge