hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 32 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3811 OF 2006 Summaiya Shikshan, Arogya & Krida Prasarak Mandal ... Petitioner Versus The Sate of Maharashtra and Ors.. Respondents Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni along with Mr.Suresh M.Sabrad for the Applicant. Mr. Uday Warunjikar for R. No. 4. Ms. P.S. Cordozo, A.G.P. for R. Nos. 1 to 3. Mr.Kiran Gandhi i/by Little & Co. for R. No. 5. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009 DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009 DATED: 24TH MARCH, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard parties. . In our opinion, no case made out for review. Hence, Review petition rejected. . However, as this is matter pertaining to the appearance of students for S.S.C. Examination, these cases ought to be disposed of as expeditiously as possible which was also a request made by the learned counsel for the Review Petitioner at the time of hearing of the Review Petition. Hence, it will be open for the Review Petitioner to move the appropriate Bench for suitable directions. . With the above directions, review Petition disposed of. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)