&. IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. ^ Ll l 5" / 2011 PETITIONER ^ ^ ?^-^ ...-::v^ ,,\^-^"...-- -^AK<-:';" '•IljAf.'" ^1'" }'*)'- ..-' ^.^-^••" ^.••\4 ^ RESPONDENTS Smt. Victoria Lakda, W/o Mikhail Lakda, Head Master, Middle School Jambahar, Block Lailunga, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, ThraHghAfafi^eeEetaiy^ Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur. 2. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) 2. District Education. Officer, Distict Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT. •^ HIG±jCOURT QF CHHATT1SGAEH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.4415 OF 2011 PETITIONER Smt. Victoria Lakda RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & others Gowri (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Ravindra Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General for the State. QRDER^ORAL) (Passed on this 12th day ofAugust, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the legality and validity of the order dated 15-7-2011 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Government Middle School, Jambahar, Block Lailunga to the office Block Education Officer, Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh. 3. At the very outset, leaned counsel appearihg for the State submits that by memo dated 9-8-2011 issued by the Department of School Education, all the transfer orders of Head Masters, which have been declared as class II posts, have been cancelled. Thus, nothing remains for adjudication. 4. In view of foregoing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication jn this matter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- -SatishK. Judge tn [|!il -^