-HC-22 sn^r^r [<-fi.+ aii^r stitiiti'gftii Jf.' 7SI •i\Wlv\ti, 'S^ftWTS, ['IMI'My 3(T^?r 'vrsf; <a *n*<eiT strqiw •^ 200 f^^ST' SII^T ^BIWdfef SIN6LE BB<ICH: HONW.E IJUSTTCE DHIRB>IDRA MISHRA w.p. rci N0.1724^008 PETITIONffi Vidyawati Aged edwu Tehsil-Pal, t>evi, W/o Bhorat Prasad Tiwar'i, 53 yea-s, R/o Village Ramcniygary, pon|iu"a, &istf-.: Sargiya (C.$,). Vs RESPON&BffS 20.03.2008 the Mr. &. Pondey, Advocate for Mr. Sumesh B<y<u, fiovernmenf Heard. By this petitjon under Artic| petitioner" has pra/ed for following r41ief;- 1. That the Hon'ble Courtl respondent authority to| construction of the towh No.633/1 over the petitiorjei <»l<(tci<iliWRft' 4 fs^et <Rntrii< ^siRgir aii^i 1. State |of Chhattisgorh, Through The Secreto^y, Urbcn Oevelopmsnt, D.K.5. BhawanJRaipur, Oistt. Raipur (C.6.) 2. Chief ^unicipality Officer, Rinnontyganj, Oistt. 5|2rgi<ja (C.6.) 3. The A^lditiona! Collector, Rnmaniygtuy', Sargiua[ Distt. Sargyja (,C.@.). 4. The Si^b-Nvisional Officer, Romahu^anJ, Sargiua[ t)istt. Sargiya (C.6.). petitioner. Advocate for the State, e 226 of 1+ie Cbnstitution of India the may kindly be pleosed to direct the set aside the entire work order for hall <md shopping complex in KhQsra ler's land. [^^fig^ a:n^r'^T W sy^i aTciNi"nf5!T ^. 'Svi •^nm<f, WSVWS, hv^wy. srr^r •qg^? ^ *<i*<ni ait<i<»i-"""""""""""""""""""""'^ 200 'fq^T"""""""""""" CT^rwgwcHf^r ^l<rf^)^ ^TPRff ^ f^y) Tf^l+^K i73riigq3TI^T 2. That the Hon'bte Court m((y kindly be pleased to call for- the entire i^cords of the case fr^m the posseaion of the respondents authority relating to consttuction of the l(Kl and Khasra Number-. 3. Anf other relief may also Honble Court may dee] cir-cumstances of the casej Leorned counsel for the pet) owner of land bear-ing Khasra No| District Sarguja. In the demarcatio^ being construcfed is owned by the continuing with the construction of| p^titioner without considering the r be gronted to the pefitioner which this n fit and proper jn the facts and tioner submits that she is the recorded .633/1 situated at Villa9e Rananujganj, report'of Armexwe P-1 also, the Revenue Inspector" has categorically reporte^ that land over which commimity hall is petitioner. However, respondent No.2 is community hall over the said land of the [presentation (Armexwe P-4) made by the petitioner in this r'egar'd. From the Werments made jn the petition and considering that the ground on which the petitioner ho^ filed this petition that she is the title community hall is being constructed by the petitioner which she can establish by in the court of competent jurisdiction, as the disputed question of fact regarjding title of aiit property cannot be gone )if the Constitution of India. ijan, the petition stcnds disposed of. / holder of the land over which th< respondent No.2, relates to right ol initiating appropriate civil proceedini into writ petition under Article 227 With the aforesaid observati ^.- €^ ^^ ^ ^y ~s K-a' f