IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.1192 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 30.07.2008 in W.P.NO.5810 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 K.Venkata Subramanyam, S/o. Ramalinga Swamy, R/o. d.No.27/2/1727, Devi Residency, Lakshminagar, Balaji Nagar Extention, Nellore. 2 T.Madhusudhana S/o. Munikrishna Pillai, R/o. d.No.27/2/1727, Devi Residency, Lakshminagar, Balaji Nagar Extention, Nellore. 3 T.Madhusudhana, S/o.Not known, R/o.Door No.27/2/1727, Devi Residency,Lakshminagar, Balaji Nagar extention, Nellore. ...APPELLANTS AND 1 Pallemreddy Hariprasad Reddy, S/o.Venku Reddy,Hindu, R/o.Door No.27/2/1773. Lakshminagar, Balaji Nagar Extention, Nellore. 2 Mudi Venkata Sesha Reddy, S/o.Subba Reddy, R/o.Door No.27/2/1724, Lakshminagar, Balaji Nagar Extention, Nellore. 3 Gotta, Venkateshwaria, S/o.Ankaiah, R/o.Door No.27/2/1711/1, Lakshminagar, Balaji Nagar Extention, Nellore. 4 The Municipal Corporation, Nellore Rep by its Commissioner. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants: MR.T.C.KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.SREEDHAR The Court delivered the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.1192 of 2008 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Mr Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard both the sides. At their request, the Writ Appeal itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage. The appellants are contesting respondents 1 to 3, where they sought a Writ for a Mandamus seeking cancellation of building permission given in favour of the appellant herein in respect of the apartment situated at Plot Nos.194 and 195 in Survey No.853, Ward No.27-2, Lakshminagar, Nellore. After contest, the learned Single Judge disposed of the Writ Petition directing the fourth respondent herein to consider the representation ﬁled by the respondents herein along with the application ﬁled by the appellants as well with certain allegations of deviation etc., and passed orders thereof. Hence, the appeal. Having heard on either side and on perusal of the material available on record, since the direction given by the learned Single Judge is very apt, in the circumstances of the case, this Court in any way would not go into all such matters in regard to violations or correctness thereof nor any compliance of its nature. It is only the authorities concerned necessarily to consider and pass appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the entire work comes to stand still and thereby; he would be put to loss. In view of the same, we deem it more appropriate that the violation has to be enquired into. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is disposed of. The fourth respondent shall dispose of the applications ﬁled by both the sides, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of such applications. Oﬃce is directed to issue copy within a period of one week from today. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) ________________ (R.KANTHA RAO, J) 23rd September 2008 Note: CC in two days B/O RRB