i£3§$é§am Dnansai Netam, Sic :ate itwar: Ram, AA nkg 4v ’l" w»- Din X :H “la 1 Egzm cxuuUL gm ycai’S Rm \iliiaga — umap'l Q35? -— Surnarpa%‘, Pesice $iatisn ~ Pi‘ihca‘a, W3 i‘ Mahasamun ($3.- ym§iimm y...‘ J. ¢ ‘ Rasamwanw Mohd YaKUb.‘$IG Sf? 3harafa'i H m NC‘i‘i'g’p@iuanL$ r- & R19 I qusJn&ai% :‘Inkk AIA avggaf, kia - Ala; vlu fwluu Mn: Nas{§, harda’a Reasi. Nagmr .Jl§h&:asi3::ra Thmugh :mymuwia we .mamuddm, Rib 431 At wesen? AddfeSs LA” ALHAA 01‘ I EeShpandey Layout — Nagpur (Maharashira} Havamdcim. Sis Em imamuddin, Ric A04 n in nun-l {Aug-J hi kw: UESI :pm Mé‘y' Layuw - wa§§§ijf {Mah arashira} (Gwnex' cf vahicie) 3. United? india insurance Compan‘gg' L§m§ted Thmugh 3%‘«Es§aria§ Ma ar, Kacmhari Shawk: Jaii Reaé, Raipu‘r {‘1‘ \JO Misaeééanesus fameaé awe? Sgciémn '§?3 G? RH-$ muai‘yi‘ Egqh ymi§g§§ P Hm 5 i‘ Prsgeni: : Shri AL Singraui, ceahsa fari’he amwan‘z. Ncne for resbondents Nefé and 2 Shr‘; Saniay $ Agrawai, counse§ for respondent No.3. ( 1+ : g m&er, EQ" E ~> The f$ilswing orda' of the Couri was mssed by Raga—A: Qagma, {Li Appeiiant Ehansai Netam is seeking enhancemem o? the competisaiéea awarded by thrs 6‘“ Addétéoaai Meier Accident aiaims ‘THbuna’i, Raipur (for short ‘the T?ibunaii) Vida award dated ‘ 95.12.2603, passed m éiaim Case No.2772993. 2) As ageing: the compense‘iien of 5,61,3GW- deimed by the apbeHan‘i/claa’mem, unfortunate eon of deceased itwar‘i Ram Netam by fi‘éing a ciaim petition unee! Section 163A cf {he Meier Vehicles Act for his death in the motor accident on {38.12.2GG'2, {he Tyieuna} awarded e iota! sum of ReéZGGGI— as oompeneatien i0 the oia§manie for ihe death of his fame? aiong with interest @ 5% pe; annom from ihe date of the fiiing of the claim petEtion an the date of aoiuai payment. 3') Tee Tribuaai on a c§oee sc‘rutiny of the entite evidence tea befote it heid that claimant’e father itwar'a Ram Netam Crier: on account or" the injuries eusta‘med by htm m the meter accident on (18.12.2362; the accident occurred oue to reeh and negligent driving of” the driver of tine offenoing vehieie Truck bearing registration NoMi—i-Ei-M/4602; as the above offending vehicle Truck on the’date of‘toe accident wee insured with the United indie insurance Company Limiiied, the insurance Sompeny was iiabie to pay compensation to the ciairnant. n: mm § iv van§a try“. ; , ,o/ 4) The Tribunal assessed iM income of Ehe deceased at Rs.1’5,QGGI‘- per annum an the basis of the neiional inocme E prescribed in the $econd Seheduie ender Section ?83-A of the ’ Mew? V hieies Ari 8v dednr‘iing 1!.3” 0f Rs.1:’-",DQQ!- tewards the ‘ sersenw expenses of the deceased, the c§aimanfs dependencv was assessed at Rs.1Q,GGG/‘- per annum. By muitmwmg the annuei F” V , ccmpensehen was warkeci out te RSSQGK) /-. 8y awarding further sum of Rs.2,GGD/— under other heads. the Tribunai awarded ~ . a tote} sum of- RSEZGGGI- as cempensation to the cteimaht fer the death of his father ttwari Rem Netam tn the motor accident. The Tribunei further directed eayment cf interest on the abeve ameunt ot‘ ccmeensetion of Rs.52.690.l— (a; 6% eer annum from the date 0t the tiling 0t" the ctaim petition tiii the date of actuat nevment. 8} Shri ALSingreu], teamed counsei for the anneitant submitted that the Tribunal has erred in awarding tow compensation of Rs.52,DOG/- oniv. '1'} Shri Santa}; S Agrawat, teamed counsei for resoondent No.3 s the United tndia insurance Company Limtted: on the other hand supeorted the award and contended that as ctatmant’s rather ttwari Ram Netam was an oid and infirm person aged about 65 treats the compensation or Rs52,00C1f-, awarded by the Tribunal is iust and proper compensation in the facts and circumstances of the present CaSe. 8) Appeiiantfciaimant Shansai Netam is son or“ deceased itwari o the ciairnant, his father was a Mason by . l .n..~. dependency of Rs.1,0,GGD/— Wifh ihe muiiiipi‘ier of c. the Ram Netam. Accordind i i accupa‘aon and used t0 earn Rs.’§'2f3/- ner c§ay. in the pcSimowem mam. deceas-ecE Eiwari Ram Netam has been shown to be 65 years of age. £33 The compensation of TQSSZGDOJ- awardeci by the Tfibunal when examined in ihe comexi of the above mentianed bread feaiares of ihe case. in oar opinion, Is oeriainly on the Iower Side end deeerves to be enhanced to eome extent. ’10) Considering 5E the re$evant eeoecie of the matter, we are of the opimomthat further award of Re.35§DDG/- §nc§ue§ve of interee‘i component on ihe enhanced amoum of oompeneaticn would make the comoensa’tion of RsBZGQSL awerdee by the Tribunat as gust and’ propet compensation in the facts ano circumstances of the §Fe$em case. H”) The anneal filed by the appeitantictaimant fer enhancement of the'comeensation. therefore, is aiiowed in part. The ciaimant ie awarded further sum of Rs.35.Qt}DI- inctueive of interest component on the enhanced amount of compensation in addition to the sum of Rs.’52,€)®{}l- awarded by the Tribunai. 12) Respondent No.3 the United indie insurance Comnany Limited is granted three monthe" time for depositing the totai eum of Rs.35.000l- before the concerning Ciaime Tribunai. 13‘) No order as to costs. s s