IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23099 of 2010 MD. BABLOO @ AFTAB Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 09.12.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Bathroom fitting articles and a mobile was looted in the incident. Co-accused Anwar Kuraishi was caught with looted mobile, confessed about purchasing the same from this petitioner. According to the learned counsel for petitioner that it cannot be made basis for accusation to refuse the bail; there could be some substance if the incident would have not been for the offence under section 395 of the I.P.C. that also against unknown in which several probabilities remain for appearance of material including confession leading to recovery and identification on accused person’s arrest. Accordingly, the prayer of petitioner for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Vikash (Mandhata Singh,J.)