P ZR I A’..?ATA RIB ‘., 01*1 mrrr ‘lVsiiflDRYow iq3rp BflO4 T?HOW’LKYl, tIc’ r rqi 41 ‘ I _3r_h.P.W .flh/4_e_. .6 •s 7 or, Pxe em C Vipqrt #1k. 1) rer aIe I aj 3. pA. &r iv. 4r ‘/0 Ttarst Aged q jt 39 yaqyq, •‘ind •b •, 1’. Vt (y 7 Ad ) 4. fl ,a ‘It i t I 2’ a 0 1 i lb I r “I ‘1 a Y SE C. It Rn .i. ci ‘ ) *4• I e 9 fe 2. InW.P.Wo,S6p/1990 BRNSSK: M•C•Bhgknr Sb M. Chnnnnkes 4 Mv*lu, aged flout 47 yemrg, D. V. G. Road, 3m galur, Chitrdurga District. • •p?T?To”eq (By Sri P.Y.Guruprakgh, Advoete) AND: 1. The Deputy Commisdoner,. Chitrdurga District, Chitrndurgm, 2. The Taha gil da r, Jgalur Taluk, 3. galur, Chitridurgn District. • • Rep0wns”Pg (By Sri LW. Shivyogigwrnny, HC(W) * .* Tirest. Writ Petition filed under Articles !q06 td 227 of the Constitution of India raflng to qug’i A nnezure—A dt. 6.1 • 1990. !‘o,MISC. OW)CR. 44/eP—90 ‘4 itt!sh Annexureg tBt dt,139.89 WoWfl &‘C’ dt•14•o•ao• ;nd etc., Twa Writ Petitionscoming on for hearing, this day, the Court msde the followings.. ORDER By these writ petitions toe proposed levy of sales tax aroi turnover tax on the sle of Arrack is assailed, Number of objectioa.s have Iteen raised. by the petitioners in these netitions, 2. Aro:uments of: both the learned counsel tot the parti€.:s have been heard, It is stated teat final assessments pertaining to these notices have riot teen fra:ned so far,. 1 he main çjrievance is that the petitioners have not been. heard, can be redressed now if the oeuitioners submit their repl.y to the proposed notices, The Con:rr..er.c Tax Officer will take into consioeratan the reoly submitted ty the oetltioners and will also provi.de tnem furtner oumortani%or factual as well as segal 4, asoects, The assessment there.:tter would be framed taking in.to consideration all th.e facts in accordan.ce with law, i hose peti ti.on.s stand disposed c.f in accordance with the directions given above, saF jUDGE