dik WP 9672.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9672 OF 2011 Prashant General Stores .. Petitioner vs State of Maharashtra & ors ... Respondents Mr.P.S.Dani i.b Mr.J.G.Reddy for Petitioner Mr.P.S.Cardozo AGP for Respondent nos. 1 to 4. ... CORAM: GIRISH S.GODBOLE, J DATED: 14 th December,2011 P.C. Rule. 2. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard by consent of the parties. Learned AGP waives service on behalf of Respondent nos. 1 to 4. In view of the order which is being passed, service of Rule on Respondent no.5 is waived. 3. It is an admitted position that the Revision Application filed by the Petitioner before the State Government and the stay Application which is filed in the said Revision Application are pending. By an ad dik WP 9672.11 interim order dated 14.11.2011 passed in this Petition the order dated 29.10.2011 passed by the Deputy Controller of Rationing, E Division, Wadala, Mumbai canceling the license of the Petitioner had been stayed. That stay order is in operation till today. 3. After hearing the learned Advocate for the Petitioner and Respondent nos.1 to 4, in my opinion, interests of justice would be served by directing that the Revision Application filed by the Petitioner shall itself be heard and disposed of within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of this order by the State Government. It is further directed that till the decision of the said Revision Application, the order dated 29.10.2011 canceling the licence of the petitioner shall remain stayed. The Revision Application shall be decided on its own merits without being influenced by this order or the fact that the impugned order in the Revision has been stayed by this court. All contentions of the respective parties shall remain open. 4. It is directed that in case the order passed in Revision Application is adverse to the Petitioner, the same shall not be implemented for a period of two weeks from the date of communication of the order to the Petitioner. dik WP 9672.11 5. Rule made absolute in terms of above order with no order as to costs. Girish S.Godbole, J