1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6887 OF 2005 Mr.Rohit Satia & Anr. ..Applicants. V/s. M/s.Indenta Chemicals (India) Pvt.Ltd. & Anr. ..Respondents. Ms.Shraddha Y. Mohite for applicants. Mr.Suresh N.Manoti for respondent No.1. Mr.Y.S.Shinde, APP for State. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2005. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2005. DATE : DECEMBER 12, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent. 3. Mr.Manoti waives notice for respondent No.1 and Mr.Shinde, APP waives notice for respondent No.2-State. 4. Counsel appearing for the parties submit that parties have amicably settled all the contentious issues in terms of Consent Terms, duly signed by the parties as well as their advocates dated 12th 2 December, 2005. In other words, respondent No.1 has no intention to precipitate the matter. Accordingly, Criminal proceedings pending before the lower court as agreed between the parties will have to be quashed in the interest of justice as no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the same. Hence, petition is made absolute in terms of clause (a) and (b) in terms of Consent Terms. Accordingly, petition is disposed of in terms of Consent Terms filed by the parties tendered, taken on record. 5. It will be open to the parties to approach the trial court for passing appropriate orders after the last instalment is paid and received by the complainant as per the agreement arrived at in the Consent Terms.