IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2525 of 2011. Decided on: 26th April, 2011. Bhawana Devi. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Vashista, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG, for respondents No.1 to 4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner, who is a PTA appointed Lecturer is aggrieved since he has been replaced by the private respondent, who is a regularly appointed Lecturer in English. According to the petitioner, there are vacant posts, where the private respondent can be accommodated. The petitioner submits that he would file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of ten days from today. It is always open for him to do so. In case the petitioner points out any such vacancy where the private respondent is willing to work and on such willingness being produced 2 before the second respondent, appropriate action will be taken by the second respondent in that regard. In case the petitioner is otherwise eligible, he will be re-engaged and continued against such vacancy till he is otherwise replaced by a regular recruitee. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 26th April, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge.