IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25138 of 2010 URMILA DEVI WIFE OF MADAN SAO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.8.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is the mother-in-law of the deceased and it is not a case u/s.304B I.P.C., which would raise presumption against the accused persons. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 18.2.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur in Hasanpur P.S.case No.16 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on - 2 - each date and if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )