IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14148 of 2009 AJAY PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 27.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Case was instituted under sections 379 and 461 of the Indian Penal Code which is Civil Line P.S. Case No. 9 of 2008. The allegation is that in the night of 23rd/24th January, 2008 a theft of burglary was committed in the jewellery shop of the informant and on due investigation the role of the petitioner has emerged. It is alleged that he was keeping his eyes on the operation of theft and other accused committed the crime. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has remained in custody for one and half years and the other co-accused have been enlarged on bail by different orders which have been indicated in paragraphs 12 and 13 of the bail application. Taking the role played by the petitioner and the period spent in custody, let the petitioner, namely, Ajay Paswan be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Civil Line P.S. Case No. 9 of 2008. One of the sureties will be executed by Vijay Paswan the so called brother of the petitioner on due identification by the court below. It is further recorded that - 2 - the petitioner will appear on each and every date fixed in the case in course of the trial and he will not abscond. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)