THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S. APPA RAO C.C No.379 OF 2011 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana) This contempt case is filed alleging violation of the order, dated 28.12.2010 and 2.2.2011 in FCAMP No.530 of 2010 in FCA No.173 of 2010. On 28.12.2010, in FCAMP No.530 of 2010 the Bench hearing the family matters made the following order: “This application is filed by the petitioner-father seeking to direct the respondent-wife to produce the minor child Chi. Yashwanth Reddy before the S.H.O., Jubilee Hills Police Station, Hyderabad, at 9 A.M., on every second Sunday of a month and from there, the petitioner may be permitted to have the custody of the child even against his will and produce him at 5 p.m., in the said S.H.O., and further direct the S.H.O., Jubilee Hills Police Station to see that the order is implemented. However, when the matter is taken up for hearing, both the counsel have agreed to produce the minor boy before the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent-wife on 2.1.2011 and on 30.1.2011 for three hours i.e., from 10 a.m., to 1.00 p.m., respectively and the petitioner-husband is permitted to spend time with the boy on the said dates i.e., on 2.1.2011 and 30.1.2011 for three hours from 10.a.m., to 1.00 p.m., respectively within that vicinity. It is made clear that during the said period, either the respondent-wife or her parents should not be allowed to obstruct or interfere with the interaction being made by the petitioner-husband with the minor boy.” Subsequently, the arrangement made on 28.12.2010 is extended for another three months and the petitioner-husband is permitted to spend time with the minor boy from 10 a.m., to 1 p.m., on every second Saturday and Fourth Saturday of the month. Now, the petitioner-husband filed this contempt case stating that the respondent-wife failed to comply with the above orders. On 16.6.2011, this Court directed the parties to appear before this Court. In pursuance of the directions of this Court, today both the parties appeared before this Court. The respondent-wife stated that because of the attitude of the boy, delay has occurred in producing the boy before the Counsel appearing on her behalf. Both the parties agreed that they will honor the orders impugned herein. In view of the assurance given by both the parties and in view of the pendency of the appeal before the Bench hearing the family matters, we thought it fit that there is no need to continue the contempt proceedings. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. ___________________ Justice N.V. Ramana _____________________ Justice K.S. Appa Rao Date: 27.6.2011 Nn. THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S. APPA RAO C.C No.379 OF 2011 (Order delivered by the Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana) 27.6.2011