In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-24061 of 2009 (O&M) Murari ..... Petitioner vs State of Haryana ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. JS Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. Ritu Punj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. CRM No.52049-50/2009 The applications are allowed as prayed for subject to all just exceptions. CRM No. M-24061/2009 Prayer in the present petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, who is an accused in FIR No. 276 dated 8.9.2007, registered at Police Station Sadar Palwal, District Faridabad, under Sections 392 IPC read with Sections 25, 54 and 59 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after the petitioner was arrested on 21.1.2008, he was released on bail on 13.2.2008. As he is a dirver by profession and was away with the truck, application for exemption from personal appearance was filed. However, the same was dismissed and warrants of arrest were issued. Thereafter, the petitioner was arrested in some other case in August, 2008 and is in custody since then. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submitted that the petitioner having absented from the court after the grant of concession of bail, considering his conduct he does not deserve the concession of bail as in his absence the trial of the case will be delayed. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner was initially released on bail and on account of his absence he is now in custody since August 2008, in my opinion, he deserves the concession of bail pending trial. However, as he had jumped the bail, heavy surety shall be taken from him before his release. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner be released on bail pending trial subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/ Duty Magistrate, Faridabad. The petition stands disposed of. 14.10.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge