1 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Civil Application No.2786 of 2008 In Review Petition Stamp No.27113 of 2008 In Writ Petition No.390 of 2008 Mr.Rajendra Shivram Poyrekar Applicant Vs. Sulochana Rajendra Pyrekar Respondent Mr.R.V.Govilkar for applicant. Mr.K.J.Somane for respondent. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. February 10, 2009. P.C. . Heard Mr.Govilkar, the learned counsel for the applicant - husband who has filed Review Petition under Stamp No.27113 of 2008 but belatedly. Though the applicant states that there is a delay of 68 days in filing the review petition, the office note indicates that the review petition is beyond time by 141 days. . Mr.Govilkar has invited my attention to Civil Application No.2413 of 2008 which was originally filed praying for setting aside the order dated 6th June 2008 which is sought to be reviewed and the said Civil Application was disposed off on 15/10/2008 thereby 2 granting liberty to the applicant to take out appropriate proceedings. It is seen from the record that the review petition has been filed on or about 24/11/2008. . I am, therefore, satisfied that the delay caused in filing the review petition deserves to be condoned and hence the application is allowed and delay caused in filing the review petition is hereby condoned. (B.H