1 wp8878.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET WRIT PETITION NO.8878 OF 2010 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Ms. Shubhangi Abhyankar i/by S.P. Munghate for the petitioner. Mr. Rohan Sonawane for for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : 16TH DECEMBER, 2010 P.C.: 1 By the impugned order an application made by the petitioner (who is the second defendant) for amendment of the written statement has been rejected. In the suit of the year 1995, the application for amendment was made at a stage when recording of evidence of the plaintiff was completed. The application was made on 27th March, 2010. 2 wp8878.10.sxw 2 Considering the stage at which application was made and considering the nature of amendment, at this stage no interference is called for in jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In the event, the decree passed in the suit is adverse to the petitioner, he can always challenge the impugned order while preferring the appeal against the decree. Subject to what is observed above, writ petition is not entertained and same is rejected. JUDGE