IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 8TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 28920 of 2008(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- T.M.REMA, W/O. PRAKASH KUMAR, AGED 35 YEARS, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT A.U.P. SCHOOL, NHANGATTIRI, THRITHALA EDUCATIONAL SUB DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD. 3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER THRITHALA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4. THE MANAGER, A.U.P. SCHOOL, NHANGATTIRI, THRITHALA, PALAKKAD 679311. 5. THE HEADMASTER, A.U.P. SCHOOL, NHANGATTIRI, THRITHALA, PALAKKAD -679 311. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) 28920 of 2008 -------------------------------------------------------- Dated: SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner has been appointed as a UPSA under the 4th respondent. This has been approved by Ext.P5 order of the 3rd respondent. Prior to this, she was appointed by the 4th respondent at different occasions and that was approved by Exts.P1 to P4. However, probation was not declared and ultimately Ext.P7 is the order that has been passed against which petitioner has filed Ext.P9 revision before the 1st respondent. It is complaining of delay in the disposal of Ext.P9, the writ petition has been filed. 2. Having regard to the above facts, as also the submission that the Department itself could have passed orders in his favour, going by Rule 6 of Chapter XIV KER, I see no justification for not granting the relief to expedite the disposal of Ext.P9 that is sought for. 3. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of WP(C) 28920/08 2 directing that the 1st respondent shall take up, consider and pass orders on Ext.P9. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, and at any rate within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, with notice to the petitioner. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-