IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.940 of 2010 VIJAY PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------- 2/ 03.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner’s transfer by Jinesh Chandra Jain was for a piece of land having no authority over the Government land. If it is a reality then also payment is made to Jinesh Chandra Jain. No accusation can be justified for petitioner’s role to arrange a meeting for the transaction (execution of sale) to refuse anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 349 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bhojpur at Arrah subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)