IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15091 of 2008 MD.MAHTAB ALAM, son of late Md. Khaliluddin, resident of Mohalla – Hathsarganj, Police station – Hajipur, district – Vaishali. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Danish Mahtab, son of Md. Mahtab Alam resident of Mohalla – Sabzibagh, Dariapur, PS – Peerbahore, District – Patna, under the guardianship of his mother Fatma Khatoon. ----------- 02. 21.5.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner, counsel for opposite party No.2 and counsel for the State. Revisional order does not suffer from any illegality because the submissions which have been made at the bar on behalf of the petitioner are issues which can be looked into after the trial is completed and final arguments are made on conclusion of the trial. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the minor son is not a fit witness to depose or that his evidence could not be taken into consideration since his name did not figure in the column of witnesses or otherwise, are matters which can be best appreciated at the time of conclusion of the trial. There could not be a piece-meal appreciation of evidence or inclusion or exclusion to be considered at this stage. Petitioner has liberty to raise all these questions after the trial concludes. The application is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J )