THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH SECOND APPEAL NO. 1290 OF 2011 DT.18.11.2011 Between: Maddali Srinivasa Rao Petitioner And Maddali Maheswar and another … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri B Chinnapa Reddy Counsel for respondents: Sri G Vijay Babu The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH SECOND APPEAL NO. 1290 OF 2011 ORDER: This Second Appeal is filed against the decree and judgment dated 2.4.2009 in A.S. No. 39 of 2008 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri confirming the judgment and decree dated 8.10.2007 in O.S. No. 326 of 2005 (POP No. 4 of 2003) on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri, Guntur district. The appellant-defendant is father of the respondents/plaintiffs. The plaintiffs being minor, represented by their natural mother, filed a suit in O.S.No. 326 of 205 (POP 4/2003) seeking maintenance of Rs.2000/- each per month and to create charge over the plaint “A” schedule property. The trial Court, by its judgment dated 8.10.2007 partly decreed the suit with costs awarding monthly maintenance of Rs.750/- each. Aggrieved by the same, the defendant carried the matter in appeal in A S No. 39 of 2008. The lower appellate Court by its judgment dated 2.4.2009 dismissed the appeal confirming the judgment of the trial Court dated 8.10.2007. Hence, the present Second Appeal. Heard both sides. Having heard the counsel on either side and on perusal of the material on record, it is seen that both the Courts upon considering the evidence came to the conclusion that the appellant-father has got landed property and he is working as an employee and taking into consideration his financial status, has rightly granted the maintenance to the minor child at the rate of Rs.750/- each per month, which needs no interference by this Court. There is no substantial question of law that arises for consideration of this Court. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed. No costs. _____________ V ESWARAIAH,J DATE: 18.11.2011 TVK