THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL No. 437 of 2001 JUDGMENT: (Per T. Meena Kumari, J) On 7.7.2008, when the matter was called, the learned counsel for the respondent No.3 was absent and the matter was directed to be listed today for Orders. Today also the learned counsel for the respondent No.3 is absent and hence, the matter is heard and disposed of. The Writ Appeal is ﬁled against the observations of the learned Single Judge made in Writ Petition No. 27304 of 1997, dated 10.12.1999 to say that the back wages which have been paid to the respondent No.1 shall be recovered from the then Depot Manager and also the Enquiry Oﬃcer. But, however, in view of the categorical ﬁnding of the learned Single Judge that the petitioner should be awarded back wages with all attendant beneﬁts, we are of the opinion that the observations of the learned Single Judge to say that the back wages should be recovered from the two employees i.e. the then Depot Manager and also the Enquiry Oﬃcer is set aside and the Order of the learned Single Judge is modified to the extent indicated above. The Writ Appeal is disposed of accordingly. _______________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J _______________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 8.7.2008 CHV