IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASWJR Writ Petition {0 No. 1119 of2008 Petitioner Smt Saqit Kaur, aged 80 years, Widow of Plaintiff late Sfari Shersingh, Resident of Bhflai-3, DisfdctDuxg (C.G.) Versus Respondents l. Siislril jKumar Yadava, aged 35 yi», S/o Defendaats RajendraLispendispuxftiaseron 01-06-04 &om resp.3), R/o Chaiwla^ Talisil - Patsm, Distt. Durg C.G. 2, Supnya Teiiibulker, aged 28 years, d/o Gyaniram: (Lis pendis puaxdiaser on 09-09- 04 firoia rcsp<4) R/o Paiichshel S^ar^ Charoda, Tah-Patan, Distt. Duig. 3. Snxt. Manorama siiigh Ralpisr, w/o Stm Ambika (I^ paEid^ pui<^^ cm 08-04-92 feom. resp.5, R/o CIiaioda, Tah-Pataa, Distt. Durg C.G. 4, Haremiralraiaar Sio^ ^oDeopi^aa^^ Rajput (Lis pendis piirchaser on 08-04-92 JGpQixi resp.5) Resudents of Paiieb^iel aiagar Charoda,Tah. Pataa, Distt. Duig 5. I^iaiam,ag^70^yeaa^ rf^ Siraakala (Lis pendis ^eller to respfimcteiit Nos 3 and 4) Tah. Patan, Distt Dvsg C.G. (Writ Petition underArticle 227 ofthe Constitutionoftodia) (SB: Hoii'bleSlmSatishK. AgnihotxiJ.) ShnH.B.Agarwal, Seiitor Advocate i?<^^ K. C^faatoabox^, Advocate for the petitioner. O R DE R (Passed on fhis 11th Da^ ofDecCTiber, ^)08) 1 • Leanied couiisel appearii^ Jbr the pditioxiey sutoxatts ttori: ffae petitioner has fitei fhis pctition cliaMenging fhe order dated 2.8.2007 (Aanexurc P/1), passed by the Distnct Jiadge, Diu^ in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 15/2006, affinningtkte oxdCTdatKl 5,8.2006, passedbythe Firat CivilJudge Class-I, Diaig iii Suit No. 105-A/2005, whcrcby the appliGation fiied uader Ordcr 39 Rute 1 and 2 read witti Section 151 <rf th®C^t Rrocedure Code, for graat ofinjunction, was I'ejected. 2. 4. 5. Tliakur ^^^ Leariied coiinsd appearmg fbr the petitioaer ftixther s^ fhat siace there are certaia subsequent (tevelopmeats aiBter p^ssing of ffaie oxder dated 2.8,2007 (Amiexure P/l), fhersfore fhe petitkmer seeks iajuactton ia view of fhe siibs^quexit developmente, Siace tfais pxayer M being made for tihe firat tmae, itwcnxhl be pxoper if an appUcation is made by fhe petitfoner befiwe tfae tdal Court, which may be considered aad decided ia accoaxlacice wittt law, havmg regsffd to tibe sidteseqiumt developments. It is ordered accordingly. In view of the ibregoiiig, this petition staads dUv^posed of Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge G