^f~- 1 U. INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ PetitiofrNo. 3364-7 2006 Petitioner *.^ ^?'^ r^ .^~.. ^>^y/ ^z^y .••'-.<'..•" ..•" A'" /J^ ^%yy ^- ^' Dr. Ku. Sushama Bajpai Age61 Yrs D/o L^ Shvf £• S. < ^a-l P'U Asst. Professor at Govt. Dudadhari Bajrang Mahila College Raipur , VS-- VERSUS Respondent State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Deptt. ofHigherEducation, DKS Bhawan, Raipur [T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 3n^r?>r feN?3II^T snirotiRfl !^ 3^? '^NICI'M, tSlxfl^'16, RlClWy 3ii^i ^iaqi ^^^:/?..C^)^. ?. -3S^/6 6.„„ KINrtl st>*li* ^•'•••^-•••'•"•••"g-^ 200 R<>«^ an^TwnwHfer 11.07.2006. Mr. Manoj Sharma, couns^l Mr. A.S. Kachhawaha, Gotrt advance copy. l-1eard both the counsel. ^l for the petitioner. t. Advocate for the State/respondents, on By this writ petition under the petitioner has challenged (Annexure-P/1) whereby she has The main ground for challenge i; 61 years and she is going to retin Article 226/227 ofthe ConsUtution of India, her transfer order dated 30/06/2006 been transferred from Raipur to Kohka. that she has already attained the age of less than a year i.e. 08/06/2007. Learned counsel for the theGovemment those employee|s year, normally, they are not subj|sc pension cases are decided and| require time to settle after retirentent as possible nearby their native petitioner may be allowed to m^l Advocate for the State/responder)ts Having heard learned co^nsel the facts and cireumstances of the merits of the case, the limited petitioners appears to be just, fai( is allowed to make a detailed 'hwfd'fl-f *<ii<iTffte<€l'<Ri«i< ^sri^Tsn^r FJetitioner submits that as per the poncy of who are to retirewithin a period of one ilscted to transfer for the reasons that their moreover at the time of retirement they ntent, as such, they are being posted as far blace. Leamed counsel submits that the jke representation to which learned Govt. has no objection. for the parties and having regard to case, without expressing any opinlon on ftrayer laid by the learned counsel for the and reasonabte. Therefore, the petitioner rej>resentation to the respondent annexing a (Ift^y®^) B- XI-HC-22 STI^T^T f^iNiSti^r s»ili«tiflf?tT <l: -^ A ^ 3^'-<)i<4i<n<<,®Tn<i'is,[sicii+iy 3ll^| <^?|ch II*ICTI sniitn •••••••"•••••••••••• g^ 200 ISI'()«A 3'n^TswiWflte' tiiqlci'fl'i HiinTffte<A<F'i*<;i< ^isrf^Tsn^r copy of the instant writ petition wi(hin a period of five days from today and in turn, the respondent shall decide|the representatton of the petitioner within a period of fifteen days from the (late of its receipt, in an objective manner, considering and examining the pjaints raised by the petitioners, on its own merit and pass appropriate orjier, in accordance with law. Till the representation of the petitioner is is not already relieved. decided, he should not be relieved, "rf she With the direction aforesaii)!, the writ petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P. Ni|>.2590 of 2006 also stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for certjfied copy of this order Sdf- L.C. 3TW300 3udQe (^^fel^)