IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16735 of 2010 ZAFAR AHMAD SAJID @ MUNNA S/O LATE MASRUB AHMAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 15.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304 (B), 328 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that even though in the First Information Report the allegation against the in-laws of the deceased was that they administered poison to her for ends of dowry but during investigation, certain witnesses stated that there was incompatibility between the petitioner and the deceased due to which there were constant frictions and on the date of occurrence she had brought poison and consumed it and when condition deteriorated, the in-laws made arrangements to take her to hospital, but in the meanwhile she died and informant came and instituted case. The post mortem report also does not reveal any external injuries on the person of the deceased. 2 In view of such, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Aurai, P.S. case no. 82/2009, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)