/ ^ SiSSSSIfiSiSB^^H -S*BI IIIS8BM HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 3234 of 1997 Petitioner Girdhar Lal Patel Versus Respondents Chief Municipal OfScer & ofhers SB: Honlsle Mr. Justi.cc Satish K. Agaihotri, J None Ibr the petitioaer. * ':!i3il!lgiiB ORAL O R D ER (218tJune, 2006) The foflowmg order ofthe Court was passed by Satish K. Affai'bottl, J. On 13.8.1997, this Court passed the order as under;- 'The petitioner claims that on ttie basis of his past perfonaance on. the post of Shiksha Kamii in the academ.ie session 96-97 the petitioner should have been continued but instead respondent No. 3 has been appointed in his place. The petitioner has not approached the contempt Authority with his grievance under the schenie. He should prefer aa appeal to the Coniniissioner of fhe Divisiou. Let fhe pctitioner first exhaust the reinedy under fhe schenie by approaching fhe Coininissioner. In case the petitioner inakes a approach to the Commissioner he shatl decide fhe same within a reasonable [n view ofthe order dated 13.8.1997, aothiiig survives ia fhe inatter. The petitiou accordingly stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihutri Judge