IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 954 OF 2009 (SS) Shisupal Singh Pharswan …..Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ……….Respondents. Mr. Sushil Vashistha, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent nos. 1 & 2. 7th October, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. Sushil Vashistha, Advocate for petitioner and Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent nos. 1 & 2. Earlier the petitioner was holding the charge Cashier Accounts, but now vide order dated 7th September, 2009 passed by the Chief Veterinary Officer, Chamoli, Gopeshwar, he has been asked to look after the records. This is the order, which is presently being challenged. It is not the case of the petitioner that by the impugned order, he has been reverted or he will suffer any financial loss. The order dated 7th September, 2009 passed by the Chief Veterinary Officer, Camoli, Gopeshwar seems to be perfectly in order. The petitioner has no case. It has also not been explained as to in what manner the petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order. No case has been made out by the petitioner for remaining on the post of cashier. Vague and out of context averments have been made, which have no bearing with the issue. The writ petition is totally devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed in limine and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 07.10.2009 Rathour