1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Review No. 76 of 2011. Date of decision: 19.10.2011 State of H.P. .. Petitioner Versus Ram Prakash & others ..Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General and Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy Advocate General. For the respondents : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Naveen Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The respondents have filed this review petition seeking review of the judgment dated 18.5.2010 in CWP No. 1899 of 2010. The issue pertains to the claim made by the petitioner for conferment of work-charge status/regularization. It is seen from the record now made available alongwith the review petition that the writ petitioner had not completed 240 days, as on 1994. In the first year, he had completed 240 days in the year 1995. It is clarified that the case of the petitioner shall be 2 examined in the light of the decision of this Court in CWP No. 2735 of 2010, titled as Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and others, decided on 28.7.2010, subject to the same attaining finality before the Apex Court. 2. With these observations, the review petition stands disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice Rajiv Sharma), October 19, 2011. Judge (sck/hl)