1 criapl-83.93 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 83 OF 1993 Yamunabai w/of Chabulal Patil, age major, occupation : Agril. Appellant/ r/of Nagad, Taluka Kannad, orig. complainant District Aurangabad. versus The State of Maharashtra, through Police Inspector, Kannad, District : Aurangabad. Respondent. -------- Mr. S.J. Jain, Advocate, for appellant (absent). Smt. S.D. Shelke, A.P.P. for the Respondent. --------- Coram: A. H. Joshi and A. R. Joshi, JJ. Date : September 7, 2011. Judgment : ( Per: A.H. Joshi, J. ) 1. None present for the appellant. 2. Perused the impugned judgment and order dated 29.6.1991 rendered by the learned IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 53 of 199, and the record. 3. The prosecution case was based entirely on identification of the accused persons. The person, who had conducted the identification parade, was not examined. Therefore, in absence of identification of accused, who were not of prior acquaintance, there does not exist any ground to interference in the impugned judgment. 2 criapl-83.93 4. The discussion of evidence of other witnesses, in these peculiar circumstances, is not required. 5. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) (A.H. JOSHI, J.) pnd/criapl-83.93