IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2010 / 25TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 18465 of 2010(G) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- AJITH.V.K., SENIOR CLERK, MUTTATHARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.T.413, MUTTATHARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 008. BY ADVS. SRI.B.RAGUNATHAN, SRI.M.SALIM, SMT.P.RETNAKUMARI, SRI.R.SRINATH, SRI.NIKHIL GEORGE (PALAKKAPPILLIL). RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), STATUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. MUTTATHARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.T.413, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MUTTATHARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.T.413, MUTTATHARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 008. R1 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/06/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) NO: 18465 OF 2010 G ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th June, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioner is working as the senior clerk in the service of the second respondent bank. According to the petitioner, he is entitled to be promoted to the post of internal auditor. However, the second respondent bank has not promoted him so far. The petitioner has therefore submitted a representation dated 12/4/2010 to the bank requesting him to be promoted. When no decision was taken by the bank the petitioner has represented before the first respondent. The first respondent has also not taken any action on his representation. According to the petitioner, his representation dated 28/5/2010 evidenced herein by Ext.P2 is still pending consideration of the said authority. Therefore, he prays for the issue of appropriate directions for consideration of his grievance on an early date. 2. In view of the limited relief that is sought I do not think it necessary to issue notice to the respondents. I have heard the learned senior Govt. Pleader who has no objection to such a direction being issued. WPC 18465/2010 2 3. In the above circumstances this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the grievance of the petitioner set out in his representation evidenced herein by Ext.P2 in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of this judgment before the first respondent for compliance. K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj WPC 18465/2010 3