BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR WP(MD)No.11183 of 2011 S.Subbapillai :Petitioner -Vs- 1.The District Collector, Madurai District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer,Madurai. 3.The Tahsildar,Madurai North Taluk,Madurai District. :Respondents PRAYER:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner for the land situated in Resurvey No.87/12, 87/13(within UDR Survey 85/10) for an extent of 14 cents in m.Pudur Village, Arumbanur Kriramasekaram, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District. For Petitioner :Mr.S.A.Ajmalkhan For Respondents:Mr.R.Anandha Raj,Government Advocate ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner for the land situated in Resurvey No.87/12, 87/13(within UDR Survey 85/10) for an extent of 14 cents in m.Pudur Village, Arumbanur Kriramasekaram, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District. 2.Heard Mr.S.A.Ajmalkhan, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Anandha Raj, learned Government Advocate, who takes notice for the respondents. 3.By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4.The petitioner seeks issuance of patta and has made several representations and the last representation has been made on 20.09.2011 Since the said representation has not been considered so far, the writ petition has been filed by the petitioner. 5.Without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the third respondent/Tahsildar is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.09.2011 on its own merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the right of any third party will be affected, it is necessary that the authority should put such person on notice, so as to avoid the allegations of violation of principles of natural justice. It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's case and the authority shall consider the same on its own merits. 7.The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.side) / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar To:1.The District Collector, Madurai District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai. 3.The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District. +1CC to M/s.S.A.Ajmalkhan, Advocate. SR.No.34508. +1CC to The Special Government Pleader. SR.No.33989. Ssl W.P.(MD)No.11183 of 2011 RP/11.10.2011/1P/6C. 28.09.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/