IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2009 / 30TH ASWINA 1931 WA.No. 1074 of 2009() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.19795/2002 Dated 11/02/2009 .................... APPELLANT(S): PETITIONER ------------------------ K.K.THANKAMMA, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, KERALA STATE LIBRARY COUNSEL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.C.NAMBIAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE KERALA STATE LIBRARY COUNCIL, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENNY GERVASIS THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR,JJ ------------------------------------------ W.A. No.1074 of 2009 -------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of October,2009 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph.J This appeal is filed against the judgment dated 11/2/2009 in O.P.No.19795/2002. As per the said Judgment the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. The submission is that the said statement was made by the counsel for respondents. It is seen that the petitioner had filed Review Petition, as R.P.No.301/2009. We find that the learned single judge, by order dated 23/9/2009, has dismissed the same as “not pressed”. Therefore, the main ground taken by the appellant in the writ appeal is not available to her. If there is a dispute on the factual position regarding what is stated in the order in the review petition it is for the appellant to pursue the same in appropriate proceedings. Without prejudice such liberty, the writ appeal is dismissed. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE C.T.RAVIKUMAR,JUDGE ssn