8 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1726/2008 [HARI LAL REBARI VS. STATAE OF RAJ. & ORS.] S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1734/2008 [SURENDRA KALLA & ANR.. STATAE OF RAJ. & ORS.] S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1738/2008 [SMT. PREM VYAS & ANR. VS. STATAE OF RAJ. & ORS.] S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1739/2008 [SMT ANJU SEMUEL & ANR. VS. STATAE OF RAJ. & ORS.] S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1709/2008 [SMT. SNEHLATA JOSHI VS. STATAE OF RAJ. & ORS.] DATED : 14.03.2008. HON'BLE MR. MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, J. Mr.I.R.Choudhary } Mr. Pankaj Sharma} for the petitioner; Mr.B.L.Bhati GA for the respondent. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that he had made a detailed representation/notice for demand of justice on the respondents raising their grievances pertaining to the treatment of the period of training. The issue aforesaid was otherwise decided by this Court in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2760/88 Iqbal Ahemad Afridi Vs. State of Raj. The prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that this Court now in Writ Petition No.1141/2007 gave a direction to the respondents that representation/notice for demand of justice filed by the petitioner may be decided within a period of three months. A copy of the said order has bee placed before me and prayed that similar order may be passed in all these cases. Accordingly, all these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents to decide the representation/notice for demand of justice filed by the petitioner within a period of two months from today in accordance to law and after taking note of the judgment of this Court in the case of Iqbal Ahmed Afridi (Supra). The counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply a copy of the aforesaid judgment while the copy of this order is supplied to the respondents. [M.N.BHANDARI],J. MAMTA