XI-HC—78 t ^ TSf -<11'41cfq, »lll«'IS,fac'll'M^ ,^.p hjo. ^i^y*^ wwiTWtr* 311^1 W 1i;lifi wnan^rwqw sn^i'q^? (icil3'<'\<:>) '^iiW^fean^T Cliaacli|a Kuinar tsarapatre, aged about .55 vflc*T<a i'ttor* ri'T A-R- R?ar¥*n?:ttT'fa T'f:t<sirl?lr*t o^T ytreet Jflo. b-c, rlot no; lu/, Snan.n filagaT, Bh3ai- Distt. Dura !CG) Vetsus 1. The Stfate ;f^*T¥»TO TX7- +• Aainuiis Mantra|aya 2. The (Cnns 3. Bhflai un-ectol (CG) '-r. JtUiior S.G.P. Bhilai, WRiT PBTiTIOK UnDSR ARTIC3 23-3-2009 yjxn'l'.K. 'i'iwan, Advocate] ytin A.y. KactL&awa&a, U5| Ur. N.K. KnuKla, Hr. Adv. Yadav, Actvocates tor t&e responi| <M<<^<fr;T ^lM<nf'^.fs^ <P;rl<-$i< ^?3lfOT 3)1^1 of Clihattisgarh, Uu-ough fhe J~^fartG>r1~rnpnf . r^-f n-p>r*'ara1 y-/'^/tJSii r~~ ~^~.. |n-auon,\ U.K.s. ^ya, Kaipur (l^U) fln-i ^<^>11 <^<"-+/^>-«" nictt cnawan, On-ftTf '-' l-*-^& attj.sgarn) 5teel Plaiit. tbrou2}i its Majna°'iri0 '& ^—— -.'-. UU.-^.Q- ^-.^ ', ispat onawan, ouuai, Uistt, Uurg ^flaua.gcr (Adiuu.) Blasl Fuinacc aud Departineut, BhUai Steel Plant, T)ioft- nnrir fcril ?liB 226 OF TKE COBSTITUTION OF HDIA iA tor Uie petitioner. . Adv. Ueneral, tor^tiie State. witii Kmt. A. yengupta aaa Sttn A.K. lents No. 3 and 4. i'lie peUttoner is aggnevecj Dy Uie notice ot annexure 1-'-4 aated ^'^-3-^UUb issued Dy ttie Kteel ot ventication ot Uie caste cei-titii AuUiority of India Ltd., Bhilai Steel Plaitt wliereby t&e peUUoner lia^ been clu'ectect to appear Detoiie tlie Uy. Uoliector, uurg along wiUi ijiecessaiy ctocuinents tor Uie purpose ate issuecl to Uie peuuoner. 4-. TST '^wivf^ g-ai-M'is, Fsi<ni+i4< ,. k5^; Mb. 136 ^ I 6<Q ^.........;.............^...«....^........,...^^QQ f-f'7 <»)R?fI'l'W 311^1 qiltew WIT 311^1 WqJT Y- v Leamed counsel lor fhe rietitioner submits that neluer the nespondeuts No. 3 aad 4 nor the authority to determine fhe caste 41 the petitioner and verify the caste cermicate issued to nuu ana, t&eri to fhe petitioner is without Jiuisdij reter ttie caste certmcate issuea in view ot Uie above submit passed by the Steel Authorify of WlicCfl-l iimd'T'iifS^ttfa^K i?afffim3ii^r responclents NO. i au(l '2 Jiave aiiy ;tore, noUce ot Annexure ^-4 issuect •tion. Leamed counsel appeari^ig for the respondents .jointly subnutted fhat fhey have no obj^ction if the notice of Auaexure P-4 issuea to Uie peuuoner is quasnep. witti flberty to Uie responclents to to the petitioner to the conipetent aumonty i.e. Higli Level Caste ycjnitniy Uoiiunittee, CiiliatUsgarli tor veruicattou. sioii ot t&e leamed couusel tor tlie parties, ttie iastatit petition is a|lowed. TJie notice ol Annexure P-4 Iiidia Luiuted, Bhilai Steel Plaat is quasnea. However, Uie responcte^ts sliau be at iiDerty to torwarct t&e caste certiticate to uie Higli jLevel (jaste ycrutiuy Uoininittee, Clitiattisgarh. tbr veriticatiou of |the 'caste status/certiticate of Uie petitioner as per guidelines laid jdowa in Madhuri Patii's case (AIR 1995 SC 94). The said Coinimjttee shail decide fhe matter after affording opportunity ofhearing t^ the paities. ine penuon is clisposed ol 41 Uie atoresaid terms. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge ??R?^Jr ^^^suTT^T?TSRT^TT^—FS/9S—11 /209S—1,00;1