IN THE HIGH COURT O? Jl7SIGAT®SAT BIIiAgguS GHHSTTISSARH W.P.No. ___c:2^'^ ; /2001. Public Interest Lxtigation Ubcigi-.Artlcle 226/227 of Constltutlon of B E^T W E E N PETITIONESS ; »8 £...,,S--;B"!S@S ..-^^' .^t«'r' t V<- ^rt-i^ "•" ' y ';•••' ' ")• .1- RESPOEDEKTS '??.»- -".»> ^q A.G. n» •'BSLdc[fUt{ 1. Mohd. Halina Aged sbout 46 years, s/o 1 ste •Mohd . ShaSi, R/o 705A Juni.or MIG Vaishslinagar, Bhilai, Dlstt. Durg. 2. Sam George aged about 42years, a/o Shrl V. George, R/o Behind Itoion Bgnk of InSis, Power House, Bhilai. A N D ' 1. Unlon of Indla, Through Secretary, Mlnistry of Surface 'B-snsport, Nei<? Delhl. 2. State of ^hattisgarh, Through Secretary Publlc "orks Separtmsnt Dau Kalyan 'Singh Complex, Ral pur . 3. Gentral P.W.O. New Dslhl. 4. iiiigineer-ln-Chlef Pablic '»ferks Departraent, (Natiohal Hl^away Divlslon> Raipur. cont(3. . «2 5. Estate Offlcer, Exscutlve Engineer ' National Hjtghway Divislon, P.W.D Raipur. 6. Sevenue efflcer Naggr Eallka N.1 gam Bhilai, l.st't. Durg (Ghhattlsgarh). Petltlon under fytlcle 226/227 (Publlc Interest Lltigatlon) of Constitution of Indla. -i- XI-HC-22 /^' ~s^ -'<wi<yi<i, ^•al+iis, fa'titiy WSK'ITSOTrai..ul£-..^....^/^i 317^1^1 h-U'b 311^1 sh^ich •(•ri^a 311^f'pcgTW^f53 ^{<rf^<ft*t ^Fl^f ^ fa<<^ <f^^T< ^r sifiiwan^t 11702/2003 Smt. Meeraj Jaiswal, co\ Sttri Paakaj Shrivgstav^i, Shri A.S. Qaharwar, Sr. Centt-al for Union oflndia/responden1|! Dr. N .K. Sfaukla, respondents no. 3 to 6. This pctition is in thc filed in coiuiection with widejtui (tusel for fhe petitioner. v^., Advocate appears on behalf of Govemment Staadiag Counsel (s no. 1 and 2. Additional Advocate Geaeral Jfbr wlucb is passiag through POW^J According to the petiticjner passiag through the lieart of 4aturc of PubUc Intercst Litigation :i|iing of the National Highway No.6 i'fcrhouse Chowk to Bbilai - 3. Dnni ofbardship to fhe people espe| iu fhe area, apart froai thi^ accoininodation. siace the proposed road was ^he city', it was Kkely to cause a lot ^iaUy poor people who are residtng loss to shops aad residential Leamed counsel for application for withdrawal of petitioners are not opposing 1 the petitioner has moved aa [fhewrit petition statmg fhal fhe ^ie wideniag of tfae road but tlieir [4®^w XI-HC-22 •iii'Bt ai^i^T ft-li<t> 3^1 TtIW^ffel ^'y^^ 7^ •^TORTq, •®€t8TTS,itciwy A£>Y an^i'^greT'Hi^t point was fhat it should be d^ne ia such a way that mterest of any iadividual should not be It is stated bv leamed atfected. Union of India fllat thev hade received iustructioQS that the wideniug work bas already bee^i couipleted. Under fhe circuinstanc wifhdraw fhis writ petition aad 2 to ffle thc ncccssaiy rcportl It is directed that the *l<ll<-i<(l") tlMfii'^feit <fa({l< ^SlpOT 311^1 uuasel for the State as weU as ;s, we permit fhe petitioner to |direct thc rcspondents no. 1 and ^efore this Court by 28/02/2003 and thereafter the Registiy sh^U place this file in the Chaaiber along with fhe report for fhe Co^irt s perusal. ^utstaading security which bas ah-eady been deposited by the Fietttioners shaU be refunded. This petition is disiniss^i as wifhdrawu. Consequently, I.A.No.76/2003 staads disposefl of. ^ertified copy as per rule^. » Sd/- P.C.Naik Judge sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ['Tt^'^fg^ pa