@ Janjgir—Champa, Dist. Janjgir— Champa (C.G.) 3. The Additional Collector, 'Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) / 4. Sub-Divisionai Officer, Janjgir, District-Janjgir— Champa (C.G.) ‘ ,r5. Dharam Lal Chandra, S/o Abhay Ram Chandra, Revenue Inspector, Pamgarh, District~Janjgir~Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. / BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH i AT BILASPUR l 1 W.P(S)N_wm of2010 1 ‘ 1 i PETITIONER /: J.P. Sahu, S/o. Moti Lal Sahu, aged about 50 ,jv v years, Revenue inspector (Bhu—Abhilakh), R/O Village Pamgarh, Dist. Janjgir—Champa (CG). ‘ VERSUS W RESPONDENTS /:1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The ‘ Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. xi. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 1} 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION S N0. 4111 OF 2010 ‘ > J.P. Sahu r’ Petitioner Versus Responden‘ The State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present :- Shri Gautam Khetrapal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate General for the State/ respondents No.1 to 4. Shri Ravindra Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent No.5. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 25‘ day of February, 2011) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 15.07.2010 (Annexure P/1), the petitioner, working as Revenue Inspector at Janjgir, was transferred toHasaud, on administrative grounds. However, by virtue of order dated 04.08.2010, the order " dated 15.7.2010, which is impugned herein could not be given effect to, as this Court directed to maintain status quo. Shri Khetrapal further submits that the petitioner is continuing at the original place of posting. 2. Since more than six months have passed and in view of the order dated 04.10.2010, the petitioner is continuing at the original place of posting, it is not necessary to go into the merits of the case at this stage. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondent No. 1 to 4 submits that the Government may be granted liberty? to passa fresh order without insisting on compliance of order dated 15.7.2010, in respect of the petitioner. In view of the above submission, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. \uif' Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforestated observation and liberty, if so advised.’/ Sdl- Samsh K- Agm‘wtn kl Judge ashok