IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No: 222 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 12/09/2008 in WP No. 16893 of 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Sri Syed Abbasullah Hussaini, S/o. Asadullah Hussaini, Aged 47 yrs, Occ: Business, R/o. Amarnagar Colony, Mangalhat, Hyderabad. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 Sri Laxman Choudary, S/o. late Gangaram, Aged 67 yrs, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.13-1-13/2/44, Dilawargunj, Mangalhat, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Office at Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, West Zone, A.C. Guard, Hyderabad. 5. The Inspector of Police, Police Station, Mangalhat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENS Counsel for the Appellant : Sri Abdul Muqeeth Qureshi Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri Anup Kumar The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.222 of 2009 ORDER: (Per C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) This writ appeal is filed against order dated 12.09.2008 in WP.No.16893 of 2008, whereby the learned Single Judge directed the respondents in the writ petition i.e., the police machinery to dispose of the representation of the writ petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law. The third party to the writ petition, feeling aggrieved by this order, filed the present writ appeal. After arguing the case for sometime, Sri Anup Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No.1 – writ petitioner sought for permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition itself with liberty to avail appropriate remedy in law. In view of the request of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made and consequently order dated 12.09.2008 of the learned Single Judge is set aside. As a sequel to dismissal of WP.No.16893 of 2008, this writ appeal is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the writ appeal as infructuous, WAMP.No.462 of 2009 filed by the appellant for interim relief is also disposed of as infructuous. T. MEENA KUMARI, J C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 04.03.2009 ES THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.222 of 2009 DATE: 04.03.2009