1 wp.1394/2010 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L)NO. 1394 OF 2010 Siddharth Colony Vikas SevaSangh Housing Federation & Anr. ...Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. ---- Mr. Prabhanjan Gujar, for the Petitioners. Mr. R.S. Mane, AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr. S.G. Suvarna, i/b Thakore Jariwala & Associates, for Respondent No.4. Mr. I.M. Vora i/b Bipin Joshi, for Respondent No.5. ..... CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH C.J. AND S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 29th JUNE, 2010. P.C. 1] The only relief that the petitioners seek in this petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is implementation of the directions/decision of the High Power Committee. The High Power Committee had directed the Slum Rehabilitation Authority to decide the matter within two months. The grievance of the Petitioners is that the High Power Committee has extended this time by further period of two months by impugned Order dated 5.6.2010. 2 wp.1394/2010 2] The petitioners are prejudiced because they are waiting for implementation of the Redevelopment scheme for a long time. 3] Since this is the only relief sought by the petitioners, we deem it fit not to go into the merits of the rival contentions including that a civil suit is pending between the respondents inter se to this writ petition. All that we are directing is that the Slum Rehabilitation Authority should implement the decision of the High Powered Committee as expeditiously as possible and within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. 4] The learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners undertakes to communicate this Order to the Slum Rehabilitation Authority. 5] Writ Petition is disposed off in the above terms. No costs. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.