IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39429 of 2010 RAM NATH BHAGAT @ RAM NATH PRASAD, SON OF GATILAL BHAGAT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHARKUIA, P.S. MANJHAGARH, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.10.2010. On call, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to press this petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. It is unfortunate that despite the fact that present petition has been filed for restoration of restoration petition, which was rejected on 6.5.2010, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. From the original file, it appears that petitioner had made a prayer for quashing of order of cognizance taken under Section 302 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal code. The said case i.e. Cr. Misc. No.3020 of 1993 was admitted and interim order of stay was also granted. It appears that purposely the petitioner is getting the petition for restoration rejected so that the trial may be kept pending indefinitely. The present petition for restoration stands rejected. While rejecting the present 2 N.H./ petition, it is desirable to direct the court below to proceed with the case expeditiously. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)