CRM-M No.37286 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M No.37286 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.01.2011 Umesh Prabhakar ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Anupam, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Hooda, Addl. AG, Haryana for the State. Mr. Ajit Attri, Advocate for the complainant. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that pursuant to the order dated 20.12.2010, petitioner has participated in the investigation and has handed over Istridhan vide list prepared by the Investigating Officer dated 20.1.2011 Learned counsel for the complainant, on the instructions of the complainant, who is present in Court in person, has stated that entire CRM-M No.37286 of 2010 2 Istridhan has not been returned so far. Learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, on instructions from Mr. Kanwar Pal, ASI, has stated that the petitioner has joined investigation and it is still to be found out as to what dowry items were handed over to the petitioner. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. Order dated 20.12.2010 is made absolute, subject to the limitations provided under Section 438(2) of the Code. Petitioner – accused shall participate in the investigation as and when he is required. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 25.01.2011 sk.