THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 385 OF 2010 Dated 5th July, 2010 Between: Borra Nagabhushana Reddy …Petitioner And Government of Andhra Pradesh and two others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri G.Venkat Reddy for Sri P.Nagendra Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: AGP for Education Counsel for respondents 2 and 3: None appeared The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in deleting the petitioner’s name from the list of selected candidates of IIIT, under any category in Government Grameena Quota, as illegal, arbitrary, null and void and for a consequential direction to 3rd respondent herein to permit the petitioner to appear for counselling for IIIT- 2009 under any category in Government Grameena Quota.” At the hearing, Sri G.Venkat Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP No.451 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 5th July, 2010 vrn