IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4508 of 2011 SUBHASH DAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 08.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Although, it is stated that the petitioner snatched rupees eight thousand, bicycle and mobile set from the informant after giving dagger blow to him but the injury report of the informant, which has been incorporated by the Investigation Officer at para- 13 of the case diary, reveals that the informant has received simple injury, said to be caused by hard and blunt substance. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the story of snatching money and other articles is concocted and, as a matter of fact only an altercation had taken place between the parties and except Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, almost all the sections are bailable in nature. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 208 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )