SCA/6121/1999 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6121 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH ============================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ============================================================== DURGARAM GANESH & 29 - Petitioner(s) Versus GEB & 1 - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : MRS VASAVDATTA BHATT for Petitioner(s) : 1,None for Petitioner(s) : None for Petitioner No(s).: for Petitioner(s) : 2 - 30. MR AD OZA for Respondent(s) : 1, RULE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 2, ================================================================== CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH Date : 17/01/2006 ORAL JUDGMENT By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the respective petitioners have prayed for an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent Gujarat Electricity Board to supply electricity to the petitioners for domestic lighting. SCA/6121/1999 2/2 JUDGMENT 2. This Court, while admitting the present Special Civil Application, had passed the following order; “Heard ld. Advocates Mrs. Bhatt and Mr. Hasurkar for the respective parties. Rule. Mrs. Bhatt states that all the petitioners have made formal applications in requisite proforma for electricity connection in their respective dwelling houses. If such applications are made and all other formalities are completed, the respondents are directed to entertain such applications, and on payment of requisite charges and arrangement for adequate safety measures, the connection be given to the concerned applicants forthwith.” Today, when the matter is called out, Mrs. Bhatt, learned advocate appearing for the respective petitioners has submitted that pursuant to the interim order the respective petitioners have submitted their applications and they are given electricity connections also. In that view of the matter, no further order is required to be passed by this Court. Rule is discharged. [ M.R. Shah, J. ] RMR.