COCP No. 2451 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 2451 of 2011 Date of Decision: 17.10.2011 Asha Sharma ....Petitioner. Versus Jaswant Rai Malhotra and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Punj, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. 1. By way of instant petition, the petitioner has sought to initiate proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for disobeying the judgment and decree for permanent injunction dated 20.3.2008 passed by the trial court. 2. Admittedly, the petitioner has remedy available to her for execution of decree dated 20.3.2008 under Order XXI Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short “the Code”). Order XXI Rule 32, sub- rule (1) of the Code reads as under:- “32. Decree for specific performance or restitution of conjugal rights, or for an injunction.- (1) Where the party against whom a decree for the specific performance of a contract, or for restitution of conjugal rights, or for an injunction COCP No. 2451 of 2011 -2- has been passed, has had an opportunity of obeying the decree and has wilfully failed to obey it, the decree may be enforced (in the case of a decree for restitution of conjugal rights by the attachment of his property or, in the case of a decree for the specific performance of a contract or for an injunction) by his detention in the civil prison, or by the attachment of his property, or by both.” 3. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of by relegating the petitioner to avail remedy of execution available to her under Order XXI Rule 32 of the Code in accordance with law. October 17, 2011 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE