IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2011 / 19TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26734 of 2011(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- 1. REBEECA BEEVI.K, FLAT NO.2, T.C.39/1901, KARIMADAM COLONY,CHALAI P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SATHEESH K, SREEJA BHAVAN, PUNNAIKKADU, MANNAMKONAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. MOHANAN S, KUNNATHUMELE, PUTHENVEEDU, AZHAKOM,KOLLODE P.O. 4. JAYASREE, VANINIKATHU VEEDU, KARUMON,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. SANJEEV S, PULLIKUZHI PALAIKONAM, ARYANAD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. AJITHA A., ADAPPINAKOM VEEDU, POOVAR, KANJAMPAZHINIGI P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SASITH RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. WARDEN, GOVERNMENT COLLEGE HOSTEL FOR MEN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.. 4. DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.. BY SHRI M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR FOR R1(SC) GOVT.PLEADER SMT.RANI DIOTHIMA FOR R2 TO R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN WPC 26734/11 PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF PETITIONERS. EXHIBIT P2. TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 29864/2010. EXHIBIT P3. TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONERS TO 2nd RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL /True Copy/ PA to Judge dsn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.26734 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 11th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioners 1 to 6 have been working as Cook on temporary basis under the 3rd respondent. They were appointed through the Employment Exchange as evident from Exhibit P1, copy of the appointment order. 2. After the period of appointment was over, they were terminated from service and they have been replaced by another batch of Employment Exchange hands whose term is also over. It is pointed out that nobody else have been appointed through Employment Exchange thereafter and other appointments by daily wages have been resorted to by the 3rd respondent. It is in these circumstances that the petitioners have approached the 2nd respondent by filing Exhibit P3 representation. 3. I am not expressing anything on the merits of the claim of the petitioners. It is upto the 2nd respondent to take a decision on Exhibit P3 representation in accordance with law. W.P.(C)No.26734/11 -2- 4. There will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to furnish a reply to the petitioners within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioners will forward a copy of the Writ Petition along with a copy of this judgment to the 2nd respondent for compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn