IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34155 of 2009 VINAY KUMAR UPADHYA @ VINAY KUMAR SON OF SRIKRISHNA KANT UPADHAYA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 04/01/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code. During investigation the material that has transpired against the petitioner is that ransom calls was being made from Mobile Phone ending with 72. Witnesses have stated that the Mobile Number ending with 72 was being effectively used by the petitioner and therefore, there appears to be enough material to suggest the complicity of the petitioner in the present occurrence. Under the circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner as the present case is a heinous one. The prayer for bail is rejected. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)