IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2009 / 8TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 15654 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- VINODINI AMMA, AGED 68 YEARS W/O.SANTHAPPAN, KARTHIKA NILAYAM THRIKKUNNAPUZHA P.O. ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.B.PRAMOD RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CHERTHALA MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MUNICIPAL OFFICE, CHERTHALA. 2. SIDHARTHAN KAMALA NIVAS (PRAYIL) HOUSE NO.10/821 A CMC-12 CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA. By SC OM PRAKASH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO. 15654 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 29th DAY OF JUNE, 2009 JUDGMENT According to the petitioner, the proceedings before the learned Ombudsman for Local Self Government institutions as initiated by the second respondent is essentially victimization in as much as parties stand concluded by the earlier proceedings before the Ombudsman itself. It is not for this court to assume that a high repository of power would not hear the petitioner. It is not proper to interfere with such proceedings in a pre-emtive or an anticipatory mode, particularly when, if the petitioner is aggrieved by any order that the Ombudsman issues, affecting the petitioner's right, she would be entitled to seek redressal against that. Hence, leaving open all questions, this writ petition is dismissed without prejudice. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/29/6