Vishmm ?atre,, SJO Late 8hr; Sah'kram Patré, aged about 36 ygars, R/o Viliage Sipaht‘i, Tahsil Bima, District BiEaspur {CG} State of Chhat‘ikgarh, through ths Siacm‘iiarv, Panchayat and Social WeKaj‘e, DKS Bhawan, Maxitralav, Raigmr, District Raipu‘r {CG} Collector, Biiaspur, District Bilaspur (CG) Sub Divisionai Oiiicery Bilaspur, District Bilaspur {CG} Sarpaach of Gram Panchayat 31133zmn District Bihspux‘ §CG) Branch Maxmgcr, Co-opez‘afivc Back Maiadi, Tomza, DiStzict Bilaspur (CG) " V EYSES " RESPONDENTS: l. [J\ UI ?rcsent: Shri Awadh "I‘ripathL counsei for the pctitioner. f3hi‘i Arum Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State] rcscondcnts No4 1 to 3. The petitioner, ’ov the instant petition under Article 226 of the ML Constitution of India: has prayed for quashing of thn ordcr dateé 9th Octoher: 2007 (Annexurc-Pg 1). Tho grievajace of t;ne. pctitioncr is that 116 was aypointcéi as Salasmax: by 0i rhc Gram Panchayat Sii§3ahxi to run the fair price shop aEcticd to tho said (3mm Panchavat On the basis ofcomylajjlt (Annsxure-P] 3} ofihe: Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat, the SDO initiated proceeding against the petitioner and the Secretary of the Gram Panchayat, however: the 111 the meanwhile, allotment of fair price shop run by the Gram Panehayat $ingle Eench: Eon’Me Shxi Dhirendra Mi$hxa, J. GRAL ORDER {25— 1 3—2009) case was dismissed on 28-6—2009 vic‘ue Annexure—Pg’li. EIEGE CQERT GF CHHATTESGARH Al: §ILASPUR Writ Petitioxi {Q No.6862 of‘zOGQ Silpahri was suspsnded vids ord€r ciatgd 1—10—2007. Ry the iminlgned order datad 9-10-2007, fhe Cooyerariva Service Society Mahmand has i’men dixrectsc‘l to mgularly opal Gowmmmgt fair px‘ém SEQ) mf Gram Pancilayat Silpahri and dish'ibute th€ commociitiés to the card heiders as psr thy: aBOmmnt. Shri Tiipat‘ni; leaned counsel far ths petitioner $ubmitted that the Cooyerative Service Societv has bsen entrustad to run tbs fair grim Shoal"; of Gmm Pamchayat $i133a111i whemas; fhE petitioner has boon appomtod ‘oy tho Pa1:1chayat as Salosman to run the said; fair price: $hop. in thess circumstances, the order imyugned deserves to be quashed. From the averments in the yetition, it is evident that the fair price shoy €31 question was initially aEotted to the Gram Paschayat Silpahri and the same was subsequently suspended on. complamt of ilreguialities i1} L €ts ogefation anti thereafter it has been enmlsted to the Cooserative Society Mahmand. The. petitioner, as a saiesman of the fair price shay eariier run hy the Gram Panchavat Sepahrj‘ has no Janus standi‘ to fmrpugn the onier of Annexure—P! .1. E11 the resnk; the petition is without aily substance, the same desewes Sd/— > t re ‘ . Dhireadra Mishr ‘ Judge to he and is hereby dismissed. .. . .