IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT MONDAY, THE 15TH JANUARY 2007 / 25TH PAUSHA 1928 Crl.MC.No. 816 of 2005() ------------------------ CRFIME NO.252 OF 2004 OF SILVASSA POLICE STATION ................ PETITIONER: ------------ K.V.FRANCIS S/O. VAREETH, AGED 59, KOTHIRITHARA HOUSE, SOUTH CHITTOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAMKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. 2. THE GOVERNMENT OF DADRA AND NAGAR HAVELI REPRESENTED BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR, SILVASSA P.O., DADRA AND NAGAR HAVELI (UT) 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE SILVASSA POLICE STATION P.O.SILVASSA DADRA AND NAGAR HAVELI (UT) 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ERNAKULAM. 5. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE SOUTH POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM. 6. SHRI.KARUN MENON, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN MANAGER AIRTEL HEAD OFFICE (SALES DIVISION) SAHODARAN AYYAPPAN ROAD, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM REPRESENTED AIRTEL. 7. SHRI.MOHAN FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN MANAGER, TELECOM BAZAR PALLIMUKKU, ERNAKULAM. R6 BY ADV. SRI.SATHISH NINAN R2 & R3 BY ADV. SUNNY XAVIER PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.GIKKU JACOB THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT, J ------------------------------------ Crl.M.C.No.816 of 2005 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of January, 2007 ORDER This Crl.M.C is filed by the petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash the proceedings initiated against the petitioner by the 2nd and 3rd respondents. 2. Interim directions were issued and the petitioner was made available for interrogation by the 3rd respondent. The 2nd and 3rd respondents have now filed a statement in which it is stated that the petitioner is not required to be proceeded against in Crime No.252 of 2004 of Silvassa Police Station registered, inter alia, under Sections 506(2) and 507 I.P.C. 3. I accept the submissions of the learned counsel for the 2nd and 3rd respondents. I am satisfied, in these circumstances, that this Crl.M.C can be dismissed accepting the statement filed by respondents 2 and 3. This Crl.M.C is, accordingly dismissed. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) rtr/- 2