THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CONTEMPT CASE NOs.759 OF 2002 AND 462 OF 2007 COMMON ORDER: Heard both the sides. During the pendency of the proceedings, Commissioner has been appointed and report has been called for. The fact remains that the Contempt Cases arise out of interlocutory order dated 08.04.2002 passed in C.M.P.No.5144 of 2002 in C.R.P.No.1095 of 2002 and the said revision has been allowed subsequently. The matter has been remanded to the authorities below for disposal, where the proceedings are still pending. Having regard to the fact that the main revision is disposed of and the matter has been remanded, it is always open to the parties to file appropriate applications and seek necessary interim order or otherwise. Hence, in the facts and circumstances of the case, no contempt arises. Accordingly, both the Contempt Cases are dismissed with liberty to the parties to file appropriate application and seek necessary orders. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 21st January 2011 RRB