1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10541 OF 2009 Parshuram Sitaram Ghag ...Petitioner vs. Anant Ganpat Damushte ...Respondent Mr.Shashank Mangle for the petitioner CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JANUARY 4, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is a defendant in a suit for removal of encroachment filed by the respondent. By the impugned order, the trial court has appointed a Survey Officer under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code,1966 as a Court Commissioner. The order is purely interlocutory in nature which is capable of being challenged in an Appeal which may be preferred by the petitioner against the decree passed in the suit if the decree be adverse to him. Moreover, the report of the Court Commissioner is never conclusive. The petitioner can always file objections to the report of the Court Commissioner and can apply to the trial court for grant of permission to cross examine the Court Commissioner. 2 Subject to what is observed above, no case for interference is made out. Writ petition is rejected. JUDGE