IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 629 OF 2008 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 8 OF 2001 MR. PRASHASH FADTE AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus SHRI. ANTONIO SEQUEIRA COUTINHO PEREIRA ... Respondent Mr. V. P. Thali, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. V. R. Tamba, Advocate for the respondent/ original petitioner. Ms. Rakhi Chodankar, Additional Government Advocate for the original respondent no.3. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & SANTOSH BORA, JJ. Date:- 14th August, 2008 P.C. Heard Mr. Thali for the original respondent no.2 in support and Mr. Tamba for the original petitioner. Perused the application and the reply filed opposing the same. Since this is a matter under Contempt of the Court Act and show cause notice is issued to the respondent no.2, in the facts peculiar to this case, we grant last opportunity to the respondent no.2 to file an affidavit as directed in order dated 22.07.2008 and we extend the time for that purpose by one week from 19.08.2008. Needless to state that the reply affidavit if not filed on or before the extended date, this Court will proceed to pass appropriate order on the returnable date. No orders as to costs. Application disposed off. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. SANTOSH BORA, J. lh/.