IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41643 of 2008 MUNNI DEVI & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR For the Petitioners:- Mr. Sanjeet Deokuliar, Advocate For the State:- Mr. Nirbhay Kr. Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 02 26.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 96 of 2008 for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 307, 323,406 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are neither related with the family of the complainant nor with the family of the in-laws of the complainant. Petitioner Nos. 4 and 5 are younger Brother-in-law and unmarried Sister-in-law respectively of the complainant. It is further stated that no F.I.R. was instituted with regard to the alleged burnt injury which was allegedly have been treated by Doctor in a hospital. The contention of the learned counsel is that petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are simply been made accused as they were mediators during the negotiation of marriage. Further submission is that there are no specific allegations against the petitioners. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners namely Munni Devi, Rakesh Kumar, Gaytri Devi, Rakesh - 2 - Kumar Bayahut and Sonam Kumari, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 96 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. P.K. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)