R.S.A NO. 684 OF 1997 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A NO. 684 OF 1997 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 08.09.2011 Bhagwant Kaur ...Appellant versus Babu Singh and others ...Respondents a n d R.S.A NO. 1401 OF 1997 (O&M) Babu Singh and others ...Appellant versus Bhagwant Kaur and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate, for the respondents. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) This order shall dispose of two appeals bearing R.S.A No.684 of 1997 titled as, “Bhagwant Kaur vs. Babu Singh and others” and R.S.A No. 1401 of 1997 titled as, “Babu Singh and others vs. Bhagwant Kaur and another”, as the same have arisen out of the same judgment and decree. R.S.A NO. 684 OF 1997 (O&M) -2- Briefly stated, Bhagwant Kaur filed a suit for joint possession claiming half share in the property left by Sadhu Singh on the basis of Will dated 04.09.1980 whereas Babu Singh also set up a Will dated 17.03.1983 The learned trial Court accepted the Will dated 04.09.1980 and discarded the Will dated 17.03.1983. Both the parties preferred the appeal. The First Appellate Court discarded both the Wills. Aggrieved by the said judgment dated 20.01.1997, the present appeals have been preferred. This is an application for disposal of the appeal in terms of the compromise Exhibit Cx. The original compromise has been placed on record. According to the said compromise, Bhagwant Kaur shall be the owner of 1/3rd share of land left by Sadhu Singh and 2/3rd share shall be owned by Jasvir Singh and Sukhwinder Singh sons of Babu Singh. The compromise is signed by all the parties. Learned counsel for the parties have admitted the compromise Exhibit Cx. So, both the appeals stand disposed of as per the terms of compromise. It shall be the part of the decree. However, it is made clear that the compromise shall not be binding upon any other person except the parties to the present case. SEPTEMBER 08, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE