^^" ^ o @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. S-887/2004 PETITIONER, ..^^^ /Neelu Saloman, S/o. Late Suresh .v^\^^^^ Chand Saloman, Aged about 44 ^^^ .^^•""" ^•^•^. ^••" RESPONDENT r years, R/o. Kelabadi, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS Regional Transport Authority Chhattisgarh at Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONST1TUTION OF INDIA w' T XI-HC-22 17, ^^ ^l^id^. '^NTrs, fa^i^y MW^i ^^(^ 3TT^T X|^? ..^.^.:..^t.^i, 200 L( •I^ST' '3TT^?T^T f^N'STfi^T $^+ilch ^f^a —^-^^ 3TT^T ^Rff^R ^ft?f 29.10.2004 Shri B.K. Rawat, counsel for t^ Shri Shri Sanjay S.A9rawal| State/respondent. The petitioner has preferred the respondent is not considering for the route "Rajnandgaon to Dur cM^I<n<iir1 ^l^<yff'^ FS^ ipal^K ^ ^rf^TH 3?T^T |epetitioner. ^overnment Advocate for the this Writ petition contending that lis application for regular permit Via ^hatula, Bha9hera, Tedesara" and till the regular grant is made, ^he Road Transport Authority be directed to continue the temporary ptsrmit of the petitioner. The case of the petitioner i^ that he owns only one mini bus having re9istration No.C^-07-ZA-Ol temporary permit on the route "Rajr|andgaon to Durg". He <yp}ied for O and is plying the same on the -rtie grant of regular permit an<| submitted the application on 22.06.2004 omd also deposited the fees of Rs.1,000/-. A copy of the application is Annexure-P/2. The fjtoad Transport Authority is duty bound to grant of regular permit ur|der Section 72 read with Section 80 of the Motor Vehicle Act, but he passing order on the opplication fo hosno objection. s not considering his application. I have heard learned counsel f|or the parties. Learned counsel for the Sta+^ submits that to the extent of ^ reguiar permit is con<^rned, he t-K^^r^T XI-HC-22 T^ '^IT?T?FT, "^ms, f^i^y air^r 'q^? LO.P. 2-%-^-)V^ WW^l^W^ "^ 200 •I^^T' W^T^FT ^J<=h ^TI^T s^*ii<^ 'yf^a te F^ -.^^? 3?n^?i ^cTr^R ^in Haying heard learned counset to the facts ond drcumstonces oft Authority is directed to consider th^ regular permit in accordance with lo|w within a period of one month from tl^e order. With the above observatidns finally. Consequently, I.A. No.6255/20p4 stands disposed of. Certified copy as per ruJes. ^l^tcl^l ^IHCll*'? f^^i ^^K '^'srf^R^T^r :or the parties and hayin9 re9ard 1+ie case. the ftoad Transport apptication of the petttioner for and pass an appropriate order date of receipt of copy of this this petition is disposed of Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge