IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5733 of 2008 Gulam Najmul Hoda son for late Gulam Mustafa,residentof village- Rahimpur Pyare @ Babhangama,P.O.- Banghara,p.s. Vidyapati Nagar(Ghatah0), District-Samstipur,Bihar. ……………… Petitioner Versus 1. The State Election Commission, Bihar, Near R.Block,Sone Bhavan-IIIrd Floor,Patna. 2. District Election Officer-CUM-Collector, Samastipur. 3. Sub-divisional Officer cu, Returning Officer, Dalsingsarai,District-Samastipur,(Bihar). 4. Block Election Officer Cum Block Development Officer, Vidyapati Nagar, District-Samastipur(Bihar) 5. Assisttant Returning Officer Cum Counting Officer (A.R.O.) Sri VivekanandSingh, Block-Vidyapati Nagar, Distgrict- Samastipur(Bihar). 6. Presiding Officer, Booth No.28, Maniyarpur Panchayat, Block and P.S.-Vidyapatinagar, District-Samastipur(Bihar) 7. The State Election Observer at present Revenue Department, Old Secretariat Patna. ……………Respondents-Ist set. 8. Harihar Prasad son of Late Vishwanath Prasad Singh( Mukhiya), Gram Panchayat Maniyarpur, Block and P.S Vidyapatinagar ,District-Samastipur. 9. Sri Ramshreshatha Singh son of Late Rajnarayan Singh. 10. Rampukar Sahani son of Late Gajendra Sahani, Respondent 9 and 10 are residendts of village-Rahimpur Pyare, 11. Sri Jay,amga; Sahani son of Sri Ramprakash Sahani. 12. Sri Vinod Rai son of Pradeep Rai. 13. Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh son of late Basant Singh. 14. 14.Sri Ashok Hazari, son of Sri Sitaram Hazari, Respondent Nos. 11 to 14 are residents of village-Maniyarpur,P.O.-Banghara,P.S.- Vidyapatinagar, District-Samastipur(Bihar) 15. 15.Abdul Kalamson of Late Md. Ismail village-Babhangama, P.O. Banghara,P.S. Vidyapatinagar, District-Samastipur(Bihar). ………………Respondents-3rd set. 2 01.07.2011 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called out. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State Election Commission submits that the writ petition was filed in 2 connection with the election of Mukhiya held in the year, 2006 and in view of fresh election having been held in the year, 2011, the writ petition has become infructuous. This Court finds substance in the submission of the learned counsel. In view of the aforesaid position, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sudha ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. )