IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Civil Revision No. 117/2010 Decided on:18.5.2011 _____________________________________________ Hansari Devi. …Petitioner. Versus Mamta Devi and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). With the consent of the parties, order dated 3.9.2010 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior) division, Court No.1, Ghumarwin in petition No. 329/6 of 2010 is set aside. The suit is permitted to be withdrawn, subject to costs of Rs.7,000/- to be paid by the petitioner to the respondents within four weeks. It is clarified by way of abundant precaution that the petitioner shall be at liberty to file fresh 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 suit on same and similar cause of action, subject to all and just exceptions to be taken by the respondents. 2. In the light of above, the petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 18.5.2011 *awasthi*