r'aeaTis SINuLt IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER ^./l^ ^s^ ^4^5T J^q<^y /^p^' ^. RESPONDENTS: W. P. (Sl No.'?)^'}- /2011 ~^ Heman Singh Thakur S/o ^/i' Shri Top singh Thakur aged about 51 Years occupation Upper Division Teacher Govt. Middle School Chicholi, Block-Kartala Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1.' State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. Coran'iissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur District Raipur 3; Assistant Cpmmissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Korba Distt. Korba (C.G.) 4. Joint Director Treasury,accounts, pension, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) WRnLUNDER^ARTICLE^26^»FTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA h^, SB : HON'BLE KR. JUST2CE PRITIWKBR DIWAKBR Siagh T.hakur versus State of CtAattisgarh & Others S.hri Ajay Barik. coiuise] for fhe petitioner. Shri Praveeu Das, Dy. G.A. for the State. Grievance of the petitioner ia. fhe present petinon is fbat the petitioner was initialty appointed as Assistant Teacher on a nxed pay scale of Rs. 150 aad afier copletion of probation, he was granted regular pay scale ofRs. 169-300. Contention of fhe counsel fer the petitioner is that he is entitled for regular pay scale with effect froin the date of initial appointment aad his case is squarely covered wifh number of decisions passed by this Court and also the judginent rendered by the M.P. State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in Q.A. No. 2745/89 (SSadhu.ka.nt Yttdv. & 56 Others Vs. State ofM.P. & Others) where in it bas been held fhat siuularly placed teachers are entitled for regiilar pay scale froni the date offheir initial a.ppoin.ttD.ent. It is not disputed by botli fhe parties that the Biatter was taken up by the State to the Apex Court but ttie appeal was also disinissed by the Apex Court upholding the decision of fhe Tribunal to the effect that ttie Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entified for regular pay scale ifroia tbe date oftheir initial appointinent. in view of the above subinission inade by the coi.uisel for the parties, ftie petition is disposed of ia tlie same terms ie. the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representa.tion, if so advised, in the light ofthe aforesaid judginent and tbe circular dated 27.12.2008 3.1.2011 (Anaexure P/2 & P/3) aiid ia tuni, the concemed aSpsif .iBiirMiQ ja^upi.ia -/PS •AU3J TplA 33-EtBp.IOOS®III .ipOU^S aOTtBlU3S3J:d3-I 31^ 3pp3p O^ AU3qT[ vs aq ppioM paiuaoTioo .'Etuoipire aip piTe SSBO aTp jo stuani sip uo aormdo AVS passa^dxs ^ou seq ^noo siq^ .j.Bip jesp apBrn si ^j •sye} siff. jo AI[C(TUOS snp isye japjo aiqi^nis SSBU o^ sspuoionB atiqg aip TOOJ}: pstoadxs 'si -^ •AlS'm:p.t030^J3T[3J 3TCIBS 01 p3ppU'3 3q ABWI JSUOR.psd atp 'S6'TO'eO P31.13P -tapio j£q £6/2689 •ON (TWO) nort^aj aA^sq TE?i33ttg ai ^jiioo aTasjdns aip. Aq paiiugaoo Ap.uanbasqns pue (Bjdns) npBj^ ^aBqnqpBpi m leanquj, 3Ai(Bj»si:mit[pv a^^s 3TO ^q. psssBd japio -iad SB giipooj s'aies aip. ao sptreis jaaoi^pad aq^ jj •SAtiosdsjgd sfi ar pae s^uam HAO S}T ao SSBO srq japisaoo 01 ps^osjip si inapiiodssj: