IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27036 of 2009 1. SHEO PUJAN SAH, SON OF LATE BRAHMDEO SAH 2. MUKESH KUMAR SAH @ SINGH, SON OF SHEO PUJAN SAH 3. MOTI SAH, SON OF JAY GOBIND SAH 4. RANJIT SAH, SON OF CHANDESHWAR SAH ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PAURA MADAN SINGH, P.S. SARAI, DISTT. VAISHALI. ------- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. HARINARAYAN SAH, SON OF LATE CHULHAI SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PAURA MADAN SINGH, P.O. PURA TIWARY TOLA, P.S. SARAI, DISTT. VAISHALI. ------ OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 18.7.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 10.7.2009 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Hajipur, Vaishali, in Sessions Trial No. 167 of 2009 by which it has refused an application under Section 228 Cr. P.c. Since charge can be amended at any stage of the trial and also no prejudice will be caused to the petitioner even if charge under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is framed, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)