1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO.2234 OF 2007 M/s. S.D. Corporation Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents. .... Mr. Milind Sathe with M.s Sutapa Saha i/b Akshay Vani for the Petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Jadhav, AGP for Respondents 1 and 2. Mr. J.G. Reddy for Respondents 3 and 4. Mr. H.R. Pawar for Respondent No.6. ... CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 1st November, 2007. P.C. : Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that they would provide a transit accommodation in the same vicinity to Respondent No.6 upon her vacating the present accommodation, part of the site where redevelopment is being carried out. He further states that she will be permitted to stay in that accommodation three months after her claim is decided by the competent authority which is stated to be pending before the SRA. 2 Counsel appearing for Respondent No.6 in view of the statement made by Counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that it is acceptable to the said Respondent and she can vacate the premises within one week from the date she is shown and provided the transit accommodation by the Petitioner. He further states that all the other conditions stated by the Petitioner are acceptable to her. The SRA will dispose of the Appeal in accordance with law within two months. With the above directions, the Petition is disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.