?a INTHEHI©H£©UR'ISOFa0DK2A'EyR@;0^eHHATElSGARtI A3'B ftSPUR WRFT PEaTHQN NC).2-<SSg/2006 PETITIONER •sm^ ^%^^ ./-^MP^ ^y.^^. -• Jiageiadxa.KswiasShsmn^ ^^^^^^ S/Q Late Sri I'laimada Prasad ftge^ ab<mt-^^aE^^ ^^^ ^ I^o Ptot noi. ®^ ^ ^Et^^ Na@Er, New diangcu'a RaipurtC.GT.) ^ , ®hata, ^- VERSUS RESPONDENTS /" 1.^ Stateo^Chhaftisgaili, Tbxwi^^.S^Estary, Depaitmei ; of I ^th ServiceSi Mantrala}% D.K.&^ B^ ^RmpariCJQ^ v^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ :;^' ^I.'JIIJCIJU^U.// ,t-»CXYJ ;,^C>I|^ 'fi^i^V:^^>2-\^i .G'y 1 Govei^ent^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^".,:'':::;:':':~:;': ..:^ ^. iTlle C^uef ^edical ?& 3Hea^ iQffiGer^DhamtaEt^CLG.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^,^ WRIT I'ETITIO^ ^NM» AmiGLE^^^^^^^ cmts's^'sw^as^^^^^^ t^^^^^^^ :An*Ronai(CT^'':^rlaT(s^^€>itORiaRf^ ^ .-fc.''-f' HtGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH Al BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 2538 of 2006 PETITIONER : Raj6ndra Kumar Sharma. :'.VERSUS , ..,, , .; ••••,.'. ::1.'..' RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRITPETmONUNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB:H<ni'bleSUriSatishK.AeiuUOtri.J. Present: Shri Y.C.Sharma, AdvOGate forthepetitiQner. 8hriV.V.S.Moorthy,Dy.A.G.fOr1lieState/resp6ndenfs. ORDERfORALl (Passed on 12th day of April, 2010) I. Leamed counset appearing fbr the petitioner submits that ofi account 6f 6n aecount 6f sufferance 6f acute cervical spondylitis, tUe petitioner working as Surveillance Malaria Inspector, later on re-designated as Junkw Malaria Inspector, submitted an appljcation on 01.81.2003 under fhe provisions ofRule 42 ofthe Chhattisgarh Civil Seryices (PensiQil), Rules, 1976 te graiit^Qfvokmtaiyretiremerit.H ; apgKcation/^ thaf afteS^three inoilths, the petitiimer^st^ ••3^3.2003. :;:'..:';:;'.,':1' .;• :'' • ':":,,.. ' ;':: •;'':; 2. Shri Sfaarma, leamed counsel fiiriher subfflits Tt^ orderdated 22.08.2005 (AnnexureP/l)fhepetition&wasretirediromi serviee on attaining the age of superanhuation on 05.10.2005 w;e.£ 31.12.2005. TUereafter, no steps have been taken fbr grant ofpensronaiy benefits fo the petitioner. The petitioner was paid 6nly;anticipatoiy pension.On 73.2006 (AnnexureP/6),acommunicatiOnwassentt)y the Chief Medioal fe^ the Jomt Director. (Establishment) Directorafe of Health Services, Raipur •wherem it was stated that the application ofthe petitioner was not in aecordanGe wlth law. Thus, the petitioiner was retired on aftaining the age of superaimuation/It was further submitfed that fhere was 239 days of eamed leave and 102 half day leave, in the leave account of fHe petitkmer. On the above stated communication, no order has been passed. . ^, Amit Shri ortliy, ^eamed Dep^ State/respondentssubmits fhat k appearsthatthe file ofthe^p^ service record Uas.hot yef been finally settled as iftile date bf thp voluntaryretiremeMpfthepetitioiieristak^as31.03:20()3as£rtated^ the petitibner, tUe petitioner ought to have been given pehsicn on the basis 6f fais voluntary retirement. But the unpugned letter dated 22.08^005, retireSthepetitionerw.e^ 3 l.lQ.2Q05onattaimngte of superaimuation. Thereafter, no order has been passed on the eomimmicatipndatedO'7.02.2()()6(AimexureP/6). There is a complete confusion created by the authorities in no( settling thedispiite.TliepetitionerhasbeendepriyedBfthebene^ eifher on the basis of voluntary retiremerit 6r on the basis of his retlrement onsuperannuation. Aceordingly, theiespondents are directed to look into the grievances of the petltioner and j)ass appropriale prder fbr grant of pensioffand leaye ete. in view ofthe commuiuCatioa dated P7.0Z.2QQ6 (Annexure P/6)^in accordance •g^^l^^swifhmi^pe^ receiptofa?copy^)So^eryin'tKeev^,gnevances,Q still survive, it is Opento the getitioner to challenge fhe same, if so •advised.''.';,';/' ; -" ;; •:: • ::~ l.':' : : - ;:' •"':• Withfheafbresaiddirection,1hewrifpetitionisdisposed6^^^ ^ Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotrt Judge .ff ''y.