:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2845 OF SUIT NO. 2845 OF SUIT NO. 2845 OF 2003 2003 2003 Pritam J. Vora. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Vinodkumar T. Kachara @ Jain. ... Defendant. Mr. Nisha Parmar for the Plaintiff. Mr. Bharat Kothari for the Defendant. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 04TH 04TH 04TH MARCH 2009. MARCH 2009. MARCH 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Both sides tender consent terms which record that the claim of the Plaintiff has been settled by the Defendant. Even the Pay Order is handed over. The Consent Terms signed by the parties and Advocates taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Order in terms of the Consent Terms. The Suit is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed off as such. Refund of Court fees as per Rules. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)