IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2011 / 9TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 14186 of 2010(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JOSEPH, S/O.PETER, AGED 63 YEARS, SYMPHONY, MULAVANA P.O., KUNDARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. LILLYKUTTY, W/O.HENRY, LILLY COTTAGE, AGED 48, MULAVANA P.O., KUNDARA, KOLLAM. 2. DINU, S/O.HENRY, AGED 26, LILLY COTTAGE, MULAVANA P.O., KOLLAM. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNDARA. 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM. ADV. SRI.GEORGE SEBASTIAN FOR R1 BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.C.M.CHARISMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 14186 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 31st day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. In this writ petition seeking police protection for the life of the petitioner, this court did not become inclined to pass an interim order. Admittedly nothing untoward was happened during the last more than one and half years. We do not find any need to issue the specific directions sought for. However, we dispose of this writ petition directing the 3rd respondent - Station House Officer to ensure that the dispute between the petitioner and the party respondents do not give raise to any law and order problem. If any complaint is received from the petitioner in future of any threat or contumacious action from the part of respondents 1 and 2, the third respondent will conduct enquiry and take such action as is warranted on the basis of the facts revealed in the enqiry. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN,JUDGE. dpk