, <5/?^.i..?^-""\"" p.R.No........-^^:^^^-V" presen db'!sl^:&-""""""" 1...—•••••'" IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR 4^-1^-. W.P. No.———-of2006. PETITIONER : / S. Venkat Rao aged about 56 years son of S. Suryanarayana, Resident of Dewarikhurd Disfa-ict- Bilaspur C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : / 1. Smt. S. Parvati W/o Shri Venkat Rao, aged about 43, 2. S. Suresh S/o Shri S. Venkat ^ Rao, aged about 20 years, ^3. S. Jyoti D/o Shri S. Venkat Rao, aged about 20 years, AJ1 resident ofQ. No. 1463/G, Wireless Rly. Colony P.S. Tarbahar Bilaspur. <«^' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI. PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS ORDER OR ORDERS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. s> XI-HC-78 HIKMI Sh*<|ch 3^'^TPn?P]', ^•H'16, fs|<rflti^< ^^.^.4M^^/^ ^ 3H^Tl(?ra'(^srfg^ET) sn^TqiTR-fi* (raran^TOTN; CTgTwrfStTsn^r 05.09.2001 Shri R.K. Jaiswal, learned c<| Heard on admission. The petitioner has filed thi^ Constitution of India impugning th^ Family Court, Biiaspur in M.J.C. Court has granted interim maint^nance month to resoondent No. 1 . Mo Learned counsel fbr the pet has been passed simpiy on the respondents without considering i! The above order has been passed to be'Rs. 15,000/- per month ihou drawing a Salary in betvveen 3,( impugned order is contrary to law justice. oolo/ have heard learned couns^ The order impugned has b^ •aveffn^nts of the respondents that Wirfypft^ iinRif ^'te^l-TRn^K ^aTf^TTsn^r unsel for the petitioner. petition under Article 226/227 of the order dated 24.1.2006 passed by the . 645/05 by which ihe iearned Family at the rate of Rs. 3,000/- per jtioner submits that.the impugned order |basis of the statements made by the (ie pleadings of the respective parties. considering the saiary of the petitioneF feh the petitioner is a jeap driver and !s to 3.786/- per month and thus the ^nd also against the princsple of naturai |1 for the petitioner. ;en passed on the basis of unrebutted Ehe petitioner is drawing a salary of Rs. P.T.O. &?»• '-£ X i* XI-HC-78 3n^r?irf?TN> (raTan^TgiHR; \^"T Aa <f< 3 T^TRTRT!T, tS-rfl<H'16, Rdiyy .md<^i*.^^.^.^^/2(oo 3TI^?T<4ath (yI^°«<.iT) (o^ TOIRK (rfitT 3n^T 15.000/- per month as the p^titioner interim maintenance has not rl regarding his monthiy salary. 1 Court. Thus, taking into consi( passed on the basis of pl considering the material availl opinion that no interference is 226/227 of the Constitution ol Tthe in his reply to the appiication for ^butted the averments of the respondents matter is still pending before the Family iiperation that the impugned order has been ea<pings of the respective parties and after l|able on record, ! am of the considered |cailed for in impugned order under Articie f India. Accordingly, the petition being |bedismlssed atthe motion stage itseifand +i'af<-i''fl-f ^iMt'Tl'ffte'^t'iRi^K ^arl^Tsn^T devoid of substance is liabie to| it is dismissed. Consequently, M.W.P.I^o. 3239/06, I.A.No. 7695/06 and I.A.No. 7696/06 sfand disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O. <^