IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 6274 of 2007 Between: 1 The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Agency, Rampachodavaram, East Godavari District. 2 The District Tribal Welfare Officer, Rampachodavaram, East Godavari District. 3 The Commissioner of Tribal Welfare Department, Masabtank, Hyderabad. 4 The District Collector, East Godavari District, Kakinada. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND Bondla Vara Prasada Rao, Hostel Welfare Officer (U/s) Integrated Tribal Development Agency, Boys Hostel, Yellavaram, Addateegala Mandal, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of "writ of certiorari" calling for the records relating to and connected with orders dated 10-11-2006 in O.A.No.6799/2006 on the file of the Hon'ble A.P.Admn.Tribunal, Hyderabad and to quash or set aside the same by holding an erroneous and contrary to law and pass suchother order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:GP FOR SERVICES II Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RS} THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.6274 OF 2007 ORDER (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed): This writ petition is filed questioning the order dated 10-11-2006 in O.A.No.6799 of 2006, on the file of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. It is represented by the learned Government Pleader for Services-II, appearing for the petitioners, that subsequent to the orders dated 10-11-2006, the enquiry was held against the respondent and ultimately the final order was passed imposing major punishment of dismissal. In that view of the matter, the cause in the writ petition does not survive. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ______________________________ JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED June 19, 2008 ______________________________ JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU