IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17998 of 2008 RAJNISH KUMAR JHA @ FUCHUKA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.5.2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner who is named in the Complaint Case No.205 of 2006 under Sections 307/379/386/ and other allied Sections of the Penal Code as also under Section 27 of the Arms Act apprehends his arrest in connection therewith and has prayed for anticipatory bail. The petitioner is named in the complaint case but no overt act has been alleged against him. It also appears that the other co- accused have been conferred with the benefits of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. vide order dated 19.10.2006 passed in Criminal Misc. No.41945 of 2006. In the facts and the circumstances of the case, similar benefits will be conferred on the petitioner as given to the other accused and in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below by the petitioner, Rajnish Kumar Jha @ Fuchuka, within three weeks from today, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Rosera, District-Samastipur, in seisin of Complaint Case No.205 of 2006 subject to the condition laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. P.S. (Abhijit Sinha,J)