IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2010 / 24TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 9468 of 2007(B) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- P.J.JOSEPH,MARIYA POLYMERS,KORATTY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.HARISANKAR V.MENON SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON SRI.MAHESH V.MENON RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,VAT CIRCLE, CHALAKKUDY. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, (APPEALS),ERNAKULAM. 3. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR),TALUK OFFICE, IRINJALAKUDA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.V.K.SHAMSUDEEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.9468/2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR 01-02 PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DTD. 10.11.2006. P2:- COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR 03-04 PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DTD. 24.11.2006. P3:- COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR 04-05 PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DTD. 25.11.2006. P4:- COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR 01-02 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 30.1.2007. P5;_ COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR 03-04 IFLED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 30.1.2007. P6:- COPY OF THE APPEAL FOR 04-05 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 30.1.2007. P7;_ COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FOR 01-02 FILED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 30.1.2007. P8:- COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FOR 03-04 FILED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 30.1.2007. P9:- COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FOR 04-05 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 30.1.2007. TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J --------------------------- W.P(C) No.9468 of 2007-B ---------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of July, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers: “i) To quash Ext.P1 to P3 assessment order passed by the 1st respondent by the issue of a writ of certiorari or such other writ or order or direction. ii) To direct the 2nd respondent to dispose of Exts.P4 to P6 appeals and P7 to P9 stay petition expeditiously by the issue of a writ of mandamus or such other writ or order or direction. iii) Grant the petitioner such other incidental reliefs including the cost of the petitioner.” 2. Writ Petition was admitted by this Court on 20.3.2007, also granting interim order of stay for a period of three weeks, which was never extended thereafter. It appears that the petitioner no longer has any further grievance as to the pendency or non finalization of the appeal proceedings. The Writ Petition is closed; however, without prejudice to the rights and liberties of the petitioner to approach this Court again; if so necessitated, due to non-finalisation of the proceedings as above. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE ab