1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Appli. No.538/2008 (Smt. Sita Devi & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 26, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Shridhar Purohit, for the petitioners. Mr.J.P.S.Choudhary, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the memo of bail application, challan papers as also the order impugned. In the memo of bail application, the petitioners seek bail for the offences under sections 143, 323, 336 and 452 I.P.C., whereas on the file cover seek bail for the offences under sections 143, 323, 326 and 452. Upon hearing the counsel, apart from the offences mentioned in the memo of bail application as also on the file cover, the petitioners are facing trial for the offence under section 302 I.P.C. The police after investigation, has filed the challan against the petitioners for the offences under sections 302, 452, 323, 324, 325/34 I.P.C. 2 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length. Carefully gone through the challan papers. It appears that deliberately on the file cover as also in the memo of bail application, the offence of murder has not been disclosed by the petitioner. Keeping in view the gravity of the offences and the manner in which the bail is sought concealing the material fact, in my view, it is not a fit case to grant bail to the petitioners. The bail application filed by the petitioners under section 439 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-