IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 3RD JULY 2009 / 12TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 18706 of 2009(O) ------------------------------------ OS.292/2007 of SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR .................... PETITIONER: ------------------ T.D.GEORGE, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O. DAVID, THENGANAL VEETTIL, VALANPOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.T.JESTIN RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. K.M.JIGIMON, S/O.MATHEW, KODAKALIL HOUSE, THENGODEU OONNUKAL, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: dkr S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 18706 OF 2009 ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 3rd day of July, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is the plaintiff in OS. No.292/07 on the file of the Sub Court, Perumbavur. Suit is listed for trial. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits the suit has been filed for malicious prosecution against the defendants after he was acquitted of the offence imputed, after trial initiated at their instance. Only after the case came up in the list, according to the counsel, it came to the notice to the petitioner that the revision filed by one of the witnesses examined as PW2 is even now pending. The trial of the case before the revision is disposed is likely to cause prejudice to him is the ground canvassed for filing this petition to give directions of the Sub Court, Perumbavur to adjourn its trial. I am not impressed by the submissions made. If at all, the petitioner has any real grievance on the grounds aforementioned it has to be canvassed before the court which has seizin of the case. This court in exercise of the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India cannot WPC.18706/09 : 2 : give directions or orders as to how a subordinate court should regulate its proceedings. Writ petition is devoid of any merit and it is dismissed. Sd/- (S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. to Judge