1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 2321 OF 2009 M/s Tandoor Bar & Restaurant. ..Petitioner. vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors ..Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 2279 OF 2009 M/s Hotel Bhushan ..Petitioner. vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. .. Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 2280 OF 2009 M/s Shankar Vilas Hindu Hotel ..Petitioner. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors ..Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 2322 OF 2009 M/s Hotel Samudra .. ..Petitioner. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. 2 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2323 OF 2009 M/s Hotel Park Side ... Petitioner. vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors ..Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2325 of 2009 M/s Hotel Topaz Restaurant and Bar. Petitioner. vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2326 OF 2009 M/sLotus Restaurant & Bar. ..Petitioner. vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors ..Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 2327 OF 2009 M/s Pejas Restaurant & Bar .. Petitioner. vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors ..Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.2328 OF 2009 M/s Cobana (Cafe)Restaurant & Bar.. Petitioner. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 2329 OF 2009 3 M/s Hotel Atithi Inn Private Limited.. Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents. Mr R.D.Soni i/b Ram & Co., Advocates for the Petitioners. Mr Nitin Rakshe for the Petitioners in W.P.Nos. 2279/09, 2280/09 and 2322/09. Mr Rajesh More in W.P.No. 2321/09, Mr S.R.Shinde, A.P.P. In W.P.No.2229/09, Ms A.S.Pai,A.P.P. In W.P.No. 2280/09 and W.P.No.2329/09 Mr A.S.Gadkari, A.P.P. in W.P.No.2322/09, Mr K.V.Saste, A.P.P. In W.P.No.2323/09, Mr D.P. Adsule, A.P.P.,in W.P.No.2325/09, Mr F.R.Shaikh in W.P.No.2326/09, Mr Rajesh More A.P.P.in W.P.No.2327/09, Mr S.R.Shinde in W.P.No.2328/09 for the State. CORAM: BILAL NAZKI AND A.R.JOSHI,JJ DATED : 7TH SEPTEMBER,2009 P.C.:- All these writ petitions raise the same question of law and it has been submitted across the Bar that question raised in these writ petitions has already been decided in Criminal Writ Petition No. 2057/2009 along with connected matters. Therefore, there is an agreement between the parties that the aforesaid petitions can be disposed of at this stage. We observe these writ petitions are covered by our order passed in Criminal Writ Petition No. 2057 of 2009 and the other connected petitions. Learned A.P.P. However, drawn our attention that in some of the writ 4 petitions allegations have been levelled against the I.O., which are denied. We make it clear that we have not gone into the question, whether the allegations levelled against the Officers are true or false. Writ petitions are accordingly disposed of. (BILAL NAZKI,J) (A.R.JOSHI,J)