Criminal Misc.-M No. 26279 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 26279 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 6.9.2011 Ramtej Singh and others .. Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. A. S. Cheema, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K. S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. TPS Makkar, Advocate for the complainant. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the injuries attributed to the petitioners were found to be simple in nature. Pavitar Singh, to whom grievous injury has been attributed, has already surrendered. The cause of fight was the turn for irrigation of fields from an out-let of water channel. Even persons from the petitioners' side also suffered injuries. It is yet to be established as to who was the aggressor. The weapons of offence have already been recovered. On the other hand, learned counsels for the State as well as the complainant submitted that the complainant suffered 10 injuries. One injury on the head of Baljit Singh was found to be grievous. Two other persons also suffered injuries. Considering the said facts, the petitioners do not deserve concession of pre-arrest bail. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the injuries attributed to the petitioners were found to be simple in nature and Pavitar Singh, to whom grievous injury on the head has been attributed, has already surrendered, in my opinion, the petitioners Criminal Misc.-M No. 26279 of 2011 [2] are not required to be taken into custody for interrogation. They are directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 12.9.2011 at 10.00 AM for joining investigation. In case of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. They shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. They shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 6.9.2011 mk