BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Wednesday, the Second day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD)No.14211 of 2011 S.PANDI :PETITIONER / ACCUSED-2 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUMANGALAM TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. CR.NO. 574 OF 2011 :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.574 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offences under sections 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 read with 7(1)(a)(ii) Essential Commodities Act 1955, the petitioner is before this court seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of prosecution, the petitioner employed in a fair price shop run by the government. The first accused was found carrying four bags of black gram, totally 200 kgs. The vehicle was intercepted and the contraband was also seized. From the statement of the first accused, it has come to light that he purchased the same from the fair price shop, namely, from the petitioner. On these allegations, the present case has been registered. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would deny all the above allegations. According to him, for every sale that is made, he has maintained absolute record as per the control order. 4.Having regard to the submission and every transaction is borne out by records and nothing has been seized from the custody of the petitioner, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with stringent conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No:III, Madurai, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 02/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate No:III, Madurai. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police,Thirumangalam Town Police Station, Madurai District +1. CC to M/S. T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate SR.No.37668. RP/03.11.2011/1P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14211 of 2011,Date:02/11/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/