IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12378 of 2010 BADRINATH SINGH, SON OF LATE CHANDRA MOHAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 353 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that for misuse of privilege of bail for a period of 3 years, the petitioner has remained in custody since 14.10.2009, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, II, Vaishali at Hajipur, in Sessions Trial No. 439 of 2002 arising out of Raghopur P.S. Case No. 24 of 1997 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, - 2 - his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial so as to conclude it within nine months in view of the fact that the matter is of the year 1997 and the petitioner is appearing regularly. For this end, the trial court will take all effective steps for production of the accused who are on bail even by cancelling of bail, if required. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)