CRM-M- No. 6739 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- No. 6739 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : April 18, 2011 Surender Kumar ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present : Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. **** Alok Singh, J (Oral) This is an application seeking bail in FIR No.74 dated 24.4.2010, under Section 392 and 394 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Bhattu Kalan. “Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the only role attributed to the petitioner is that he was asked to keep watch. He has further stated that no looted item was ever recovered from the possession of the petitioner and no identification parade was CRM-M- No. 6739 of 2011 (O&M) 2 held and petitioner has not been identified by the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that petitioner is implicated in the present case on the alleged disclosure statement of co-accused Santosh Kumar, who has already been enlarged on regular bail by the trial Court.” Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, on the instructions from ASI Randhir Singh, has submitted that no other criminal case is pending against the petitioner. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is directed to be allowed. Let petitioner be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. (Alok Singh) Judge April 18, 2011 Anand