IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1501 of 2008 Between: Gompa Sanyasi Rao ..... PETITIONER AND Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. Rep.by its Divisional Executive, Visakhapatnam .....RESPONDENT The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1501 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner is the defendant in the suit O.S.3332/2005 filed by the respondent/plaintiff on the file of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. In the said suit the petitioner filed an application in I.A.No.59/2008 for sending the suit promissory note to handwriting expert to compare the signatures of the petitioner with that of his signatures on the written statement and vakalat. The said application was dismissed by the impugned order dated 21.02.2008, against which, this civil revision petition is filed. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner never executed any promissory note based on which the suit was filed and he never signed the promissory note or any other document relied on by the respondent/plaintiff. All the documents filed by the respondent/plaintiff in the suit are forged and fabricated and therefore, he filed the above application. A counter was filed by the respondent/plaintiff opposing the said contentions. The date of promissory note is not mentioned either in the affidavit filed before the Court below or before this Court. The date of promissory note is obviously one or two years prior to 2005, but where as I.A.59/2008 is filed in 2008. If the petitioner/defendant disputes his signature on the promissory note, he cannot ask for sending the promissory note to handwriting expert for comparing the signature on the document with that of his signatures on the written statement and vakalat, as it cannot be said that the signatures of the petitioner/defendant in the written statement and vakalat are admitted by the respondent/plaintiff. If any admitted signatures of the petitioner/defendant at the relevant point of time are available, it is open for the petitioner to ask for sending the suit promissory note to handwriting expert to compare the signature on the said promissory note with that of his admitted signatures. I do not see any infirmity legal or otherwise to interfere with the impugned order. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 11.11.2010 Dsr