1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.3025 OF 2010. Madhukar S/o Nimba Borse and others ...Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents. ... Mr.A.D.Pawar, advocate for the petitioners. Mr.K.G.Patil, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the State. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3024 OF 2010. Rajendra S/o Pundlik Borse ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents. ... Mr.S.R.Dheple, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.V.Kurundkar, Additional Govt. Pleader for the State. 2 CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 08.04.2010. PER COURT 1. At the outset, the learned counsels for the petitioners in both the Writ Petitions state that the petitioners at present do not press for the relief at prayer clause (C) to the petitions and, therefore, seeks to withdraw the petitions in respect of prayer clause (C) to the petitions with liberty to file a petition afresh in respect of the relief at prayer clause (C) to the petitions in the event the representation submitted by the petitioners is decided against their interest. 2. We accordingly, dismiss these petitions in respect of prayer clause (C) to the petitions with liberty as prayed for. 3. The petitioners by these petitions have prayed for directing the Respondents to decide their representations which is dated 18.1.2010 3 and 16.1.2010 respectively. In the light of the fact that the said representations are pending consideration with the Respondents, we allow these petitions and direct the Respondents to decide the representations, if pending, in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from today and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioners. 4. Rule is thus made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (P.V.HARDAS,J.) asp/office/wp302510