(AMENDED WRIT PETITION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2464/2004 PETITIONER Tathagat Shrivastava, S/o. Shri K. L. Shrivastava, Aged about 34 years, R/o. Plot No. 327, Ward NO. 22, Shri Ram Colony, Behind Railaway Stadium, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : m" . Guru Bilaspur, Ghasidas (C.G.) University, Through: The Koni, Registrar. p 2. The Vice Chancellor, Guru Ghasidas University, Koni Bilaspur, (C.G.). 3. The Principal, SwamiiBalkrishna Puri Law College, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. 1 Shn Rajesh Pandey, 00111156 for the petmoner 8hr; Mamndra Shmvastava, tandlng Counsel for respondent No 1 852. Shri N.K. Malviya, Adv‘ rs on behalf of Shri A.K. Ataley, counsel for respondent No.3. Heard. this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of In ia being aggn'eved by the decisionof respondent No.2 dated 1 1.08.200 Annexure P-9) whereby the petitioner has beendenied the admission The petitioner has pref e x i idelines (Annexure R—4) issued by the L.L.B. Part-1 on two grounds i.e. h ' has not passed the g‘aduation e nation under 10+2+3 scheme and secondly as per Clause '9. 1 of the State Government. alf of the respondent Nos.1 8s 2. I have heard learned cou sel for the petitioner, counsel for respondents No. 1 & 2 and peruse thezrecord. Return has been filed on be As per Clause 9.1 of t e guidelines issued by the State Government “if a candidate has admitted in any college or; in any department of the University in an faculty as a regular candidate and if .he Leaves the studies orfails in the mminatio’n or had not appearedi'n the examination then he will’ not be ad ‘tted in the same class”. ‘ In the present case, 1t 1s admitted fact that the petitioner was admitted in L L B lat year, though 1t is said to be a prowsmnal admisswn and as per return filed on behalf o respondentbgm prsity roll number fo appearing in LLB lst year exam nation nan$ hmnissuedto the petitioner, but he failed to appear [stew a a e d i n r ’ XI-HC~22 Wm fz€tW~ ammm In View 6f the above, I am bf the opinicn that the petitioner has been rightly refused admission in LLB 1st year course. Learned counsel for the pei respondents may be directed to L.L.B. 15* year examination as an E: In Para 15 of the return o mentioned that the case of the appear in the LLB 13* yeagt exami tion as an EEK-student is concerned, en‘ any decision till date because the claim, if he approaches respondents idered in accordance with law. petitioner is directed Ito approach Balkrishna Pun' 'Law College, Raigarh, with a request to permit him to appear in the LLB Ilst Year examination as an Ex-student. The respondent No.3 will forward the case of the! petitioner to respondent No.,1-University for/consideration and, in tum, respondent No.1 shall decide th itioner submits thatiin that case the allow the petitioner to appear in the estudent. f respondent Noel 85 2 it has been petitioner regarding allowing him to respondent Nos.1 8s 2 have not t petitioner did not raise any such with such a claim, it would be cons In View of the above, the respondent No.3—Principal, Swami i 3 Case of the petitioner about the eligibility to appear in the LLB lst year Examination as an Ex-student for the session 2004-05 as early as pos sible in accordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules.- Sill- L.C.BHADOO Judge Roshan New