IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2809 of 2008 SIDHESHWAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 25.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The order dated 4.8.2010 is modified to the extent that the show cause on behalf of opposite party no. 5 is stated to have been filed on 9.2.2010. It is now available on the record. A fresh show cause is stated to have been filed on 24.8.2010. It is again not available on the record due to late filing by the opposite party. Let the office trace it out and place on record. Copies of the same having been served on the counsel for the petitioner, this Court requested counsel for the State to make available his copy for perusal. This Court has perused the fresh order dated 21.8.2010. It stated that after the earlier order dated 26.11.2008, fresh notice with grounds for difference of opinion with the enquiry report were refused acceptance by the petitioner citing the pendency of the present contempt application. A fresh copy was then sent to him by the Speed Post 2 details of which were also mentioned in the order notwithstanding which the petitioner had not replied. From the aforesaid developments, this Court is satisfied that the issue no more merits consideration in the contempt jurisdiction because of the limits of the jurisdiction thereof. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 21.8.2010, his remedy lies in a freshly constituted writ application. The contempt application is dismissed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)