CéRAM: DlWSiON BENCH PETITEGNERS 1. Maa Durga Prathmik Swayatta Sahkari Samhi Upbhckta Bhandar Maryadit Borgaon, Vikash Khand, Doundi, TahsiS —- Baioud, Djs’rt. Burg (C.G.) Through :- its President Kamash Gadpayie, Sfu Ram Lai Gadpayale, aged about 28 years, R/o Village — Boargaon Post — Themabujurg', Vikash Khand Doundi, Tah.~ Ba‘oud, Disti. Burg (CG) SWayatta Sahkarita Upbhokta Bhandar, Maryadii Khakwahi, VEkash Khand Daundi, Tahsii Baioud, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Thmugh: its President Vishanu Kumar Mourya, Sic: Shri Sardari La{ Mourya, aged about 33 yeas’s, Rio Vinage —- Khairwahi, P0$t — Narratoia, Vikash Khand Doundi, ’Fah- Baioud, Distt. Durg (CG) Jai Shri Sai Saba Prathmik 3wayaita Sahakari SamEti Upbhokta Bhandar Maryadit, Aba‘ri, Vikash Khand Doundi, Tahsi! Baloud, Di5‘ct. Burg (C.G.) Through: its PresEdent Sanjay Rastogi, Sio Shri WashiSMa Prasad Rastogi, aged about 27 Years, Rio Vii‘xage ~ Abari, Post- Mudum, Vikash Khand Doundi’ Tah.— Baieud, Distt. Durg (06.) HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HGN’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Wri't Petitian No. 267112066 Versm 1. RESPQNDENT$ State of Chhamsgarh, Thmugh The Secrei’ary, Department of Feed Pubiic Distribution and Consumer Pretention, Mantraiaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Ceiiector, Burg, Distt.— Burg {C.G.} Sub-Divisiona! Officer, Doundiiouhara, Distt. Durg (0.6.) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India Present: ShriSunilSahu,Counselforthe petitioners. / 1 Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additionai Advocate Genera! for the State/respondents. QRDER (29m i February, 2008) The following order of the Court was passed by . Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Learned counsel for the parties are heard. 2) Shri Kishore Bhaduri, learned Additional Advocate General submits that, as the .sole point raised in this Writ petition about the imposition of ceiling of maximum three numbers of fair price shops to one agency already stands decided vide order dated 09.03.2007 passed in WP No‘5262i2006 and other‘Eonnécted petitions, now, nothing survives for decision in this writ petition. 3) Shri Sunil Sahu, learned counsei for the petitioners couid no dispute the above factuai situation now prevailing in the case. 4) The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. 5) Consequentiy, the interim order dated 31.5.2006 stands t, A/ padma t vacated automatically. f” if Sdl— 5d,- Sunil Kumar Sinha Chief Justice JUdQe