IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35868 of 2008 HOSHILLA YADAV Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 19.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner’s name appeared in confession of co-accused and victim was returned safely and his statement was recorded under Section 164 of the Cr. P.C., but in that, he did not name the petitioner and other co-accused persons stand on similar footing have been allowed bail by this Court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of F.T.C.-V–cum-Additional District & Sessions Judge at Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with S.Tr. no. 835 A of 2006 arising out of Shikarpur P.S. Case no. 197of 2006. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)