IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9910 of 2001 M/S ARUN CHEMICALS INDUSTRIES Versus THE CERTIFICATE OFFICER,BHAGALPUR WITH C.W.J.C.NO.11866 OF 1999 M/s ARUN CHEMICALS INDUSTRIES VERSUS THE PRESIDING OFFICER & ORS. ----------- 32 5.1.2009 These cases have been brought under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of the petitioner. Shri Subodh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner states that as per final judgment and order dated 2.9.2008 passed in these cases, it was ordered that the petitioner through its counsel is entitled to refund of Rs. 2 lakhs, which was lying with this Court, as deposited by the petitioner. There appears to be some difficulty being faced by the Registry in effecting the refund. I clarify that the original deposit was made under the signature of Rama Kant Sharma, who is petitioner no.2 and was a Director of petitioner no.1- Company. As such, the application for refunding of deposit made by Sri Subodh Kumar will be entertained as an application by the petitioner and refund order/ pay order may be made payable to or in favour of Rama Kant Sharma, petitioner no.2. The concerned advocate would be competent to give due discharge receipt of the said payment order. Let Registry act accordingly. Singh (Navaniti Pd. Singh)