WPSS No. 177 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Gopal Narain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.P.S. Mer. Advocate holding the brief of Mr. V.B.S. Negi, Advocate for the respondents. The petitioner is aggrieved by the issuance of the notice dated 4th March, 2010 whereby the competent authority has issued a notice purported to be one u/s 69-A for enhancement of punishment. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that such a notice is without jurisdiction, in as much as, a notice u/S 69-A of the U.P. Road Transport Corporation Employees (Other than Officers) Service Regulations, 1981 only contemplates for enhancement or modification of the order of punishment in relation to the dismissal, removal or reduction in rank. In the present case, the petitioner has got punishment of stoppage of increment and, therefore, such an order cannot be reviewed or modified under Regulation 69-A of the Act. In my opinion, the petitioner has a remedy of filing his objection before the authority concerned. If such an application is filed before the authority concerned, the authority concerned will look into the matter and pass a final order. This court is not inclined to dwell on such allegation at this stage. The writ petition is dismissed at this stage. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 27.03.2010 Shiv