1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 317 OF 1999 M/s. Ansuya Paints Pvt. Ltd. .... Plaintiffs. V/s. Shri Nandlal D. Gupta, Proprietor M/s. Gupta Paints & Hardware Stores. .... Defendants. ....... Ms. Neeta Rajda i/b. Dhirsinh Rajda for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendants. ........ CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 16TH JANUARY 2008. P.C. :- During the course of the last hearing on 9th January 2008, Counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff had informed the Court that no instructions were forthcoming from the Plaintiff, so as to enable the learned Advocate to take necessary steps to pursue the proceedings in the suit. The Suit has been placed for dismissal today. The learned 2 Advocate has placed on the record a letter dated 10th January 2008 addressed to the Plaintiffs. A packet containing the letter has been returned back by the Courier on the ground that the office of the Plaintiff has shifted elsewhere. The learned Advocate states that the Plaintiff has not kept the Advocate informed either of the change of the office or in regard to the correct address for dispatch of communications. In these circumstances, the Court is constrained to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution. On the request of the learned Advocate for the Plaintiff, the Advocates are permitted to be discharged. -----