‘ \ Present : Shn' Pradeep Saxena7 Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 1630 01'2002 Manharan Lal Sahu, S/o‘ Shri Shambhu Ram Sahu, R/o Lafinkhflrd, Post Bamhani, District Mahasamund (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : l. Deputy Director (Hotricalturc), Raipur Division, Civil Lines, Raipur (CG). 2. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Raipur (CG). PETITIONER (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF TEE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ible Mr. Satish K. Agmhouy J.) w“ y ORAL ORDER (Passed ans” day orJuly, 2008) t 1. The petitioner, by this petition, challenges the validity of the order dated 06.12.01 (Annexure P/l ), passed by the Presiding omcer, Labour Court, Raipur, to the extent of grant of25 percent back—wages. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to 100 percent back—wages as the petitioner was restrained from working. 3. On perusal of the pleadings and documents appended thereto, it appears that the petitioner was reinstated on the findings that the retrenchment was not legal. Grant of full back-wages was not pleaded before the Labour ‘ Court. Thus, at this stage, consideration of the facts ofthe case, in regard to grant of back-wages, when there is no foundation laid down by the petitioner before the Tribunal below, is not proper and justihed. Grant of 25 percent back-wages with re-instatement is just and proper and no interference with impugned order is warranted. 4. Thus, petition is accordingly dismissed. No order asto costs, l Sdl- l 1 l Satish K. Agnihotri ' Judge Sahu . ‘ ~