IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SUO MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION NO.210 OF 2006 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.408 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.496 OF 2006 Court of its Own Motion ...Petitioner Versus Mukesh H.Ahooja ...Respondent ...... Ms.Prachi Tatke i/b Mr.R.A.Thorat for Appellants. None for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. AUGUST 4, 2006. AUGUST 4, 2006. AUGUST 4, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Perused the report submitted by the Trial Court Judge Smt.P.N.Nair dated 2nd August 2006. In view thereof, it is not necessary to precipitate the matter, as the Respondent/contemnor has not only tendered unconditional apology before the lower Court but also repeated the same before this : 2 : Court on affidavit as well as orally across the bar. Unconditional apology is accepted. It is, however, observed that the Respondent/contemnor who is incidentally member of the Bar and therefore Officer of the Court, will be well advised to observe restraint in future when he appears before the Court. 2. Petition disposed of. Notice issued to Respondent stands discharged. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.