IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SAO NO.54 OF 2010 DATE OF DECISION : 26 th JULY, 2012 Kewal Singh & others …. Appellants Versus Kanti Pal & others …. Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * * Present : Mr. Surinder Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1. * * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL) Order of the preceding date has not been complied with. Correct addresses of unserved respondents were not furnished nor dasti notices were taken nor steps for impleading LRs of respondent No.4, since deceased, have been taken nor amount of costs of adjournment has been deposited. Counsel for appellants states that in spite of intimation to the appellants, they have not complied with the order. It is thus manifest that appellants are no longer interested in prosecuting this second appeal. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 26th July, 2012 ‘raj’ (L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE