IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51949 of 2008 BALESHWAR DAS, son of Late Sukho Das, resident of village-Mobarakpur Sankh, P.S.Muffassil, District-Begusarai. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.1.2009 Heard Sri Abul Kalam, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. As may appear from the rejection order there was a concession granted by the Public Prosecutor of the Sessions Division by making reference to different paragraphs of the case diary that the involvement of the present petitioner was not indicated by the facts so far collected in the investigation, still the Sessions Judge dismissed the prayer for bail writing that the victim was still traceless it could not be a case for bail. The case is under Sections 366 and 366A IPC and the contention is that merely because the petitioner is the father of accused Gautam Kumar, whom the witnesses found accompanying the victim throughout, the petitioner is languishing in custody. Regard being had to the facts of the case as emerging from the petitioner as also the contentions, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Begusarai Muffasil P.S.Case No.142 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )