IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5801 of 2009 Jai Lal Thakur Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 2/ 28/07/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. No counter affidavit has been filed despite the fact that the writ petition was filed more than two years ago after serving two copies in the office of the Advocate General. The relief sought is to consider grant of A.C.P. and then fix the pensionary benefits by gratuity, pension, earned leave etc. Learned counsel for the State raises an objection with regard to multiplicity of reliefs. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a retired person. There is no multiplicity of reliefs but consequential reliefs shall necessarily follow on fixation of his A.C.P. benefits. Let the respondents consider the claims within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before them. It is expected that if the respondents find justification in the claim or in any part of the claim, necessary consequential orders shall be issued simultaneously. The writ application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)