THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.13060 of 2007 Date:22.06.2007 Between: Hazarath Ameeruddin College of Education. .. PETITIONER AND The Government of A.P. and others. ..RESPONDENTS ORDER: The petitioner submitted a representation, dated 27.12.2006, to the first respondent with a request to furnish the information as to the annual budget expenditure incurred for Rayapati Venkata Ranga Rao College of Education or any Government College of Education. This application was filed under Section 6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for short ‘the Act’). The petitioner states that on receipt of its application, the first respondent forwarded it to the second respondent, who, in turn, had called for information from the third respondent, but, so far, the information has not been furnished and seeks appropriate directions in this regard. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the first respondent. The Act not only provides for the procedure in the matter of furnishing information, but also prescribes the remedies in case the request of an applicant is not acceded to. If the request of the petitioner for furnishing information has not been complied with, it has a remedy to approach the State Information Commissioner under Section 18(1) (c) of the Act. When an effective alternative remedy is provided, this Court cannot entertain the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the remedy under Section 18(1) (c) of the Act. There shall be no other as to costs. ____________ 22.06.2007 kdl