1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Misc. Civil Application No. 1216 OF 2010 In Writ Petition no. 4413/2010. Satish Rameshwar Prasad Gupta -: VERSUS :- Smt. Mamta Satish Gupta and 3 others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 22, 2010. As learned counsel agreed to argue, the impugned order dated 15.11.2010 is recalled and petition is restored. Writ Petition no. 4413/2010 Heard Advocate Shri Mishra holding for Advocate Patrikar for petitioner-husband. Challenge is to the order granting interim maintenance under section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act. The learned counsel states that petitioner is staying outside and respondent is occupying petitioner’s house. It is further contended that petitioner is working as a labour and he is, therefore, not in a position to pay amount of Rs. 5,000/- as interim maintenance to respondent. There is nothing in the order to show that both the stands were taken before the trial court. Reply filed before that court also does not show any such 2 contention. As such, I do not find any further merits in this petition. Petition rejected. JUDGE. Hirekhan