IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.18309 of 2007 Between: 1 V.A.R. Sastry S/o.V.S. Murthy BHEL Complex, Ramachandrapuram, Hyderabad. 2 V.Padmavathi W/o. V.A.R. Sastry BHEL Complex, Ramachandrapuram, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The State Bank of Hyderabad, Rep. by its Regional Manager, Regional Office, Prakashnagar, Begumpet, Hyderabad. 2 The State Bank of Hyderabad, Rep. by its Chief Manager, /Authorised Officer, BHEL , Ramachandrapuram Branch,BHELComplex, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the impugned action of the respondents in actively proceeding to dispossess the petitioners from their House bearing No.MIG 37, Phase-I, BHEL MIG Colony Manmol Village, Ramachandrapuram and Flat No. 302-A , Block I Janapriya Apartments, Miyapur, Hyderabad Under Securitisation Act by mechanically rejecting the representations dt.18-7-2007 without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of principles of natural justice etc and consequently direct the Respondents to consider and pass speaking orders on the representation dt. 20-8-2007 of the Petitioners on compassionate grounds and on realistic basis giving due weightage to the compelling circumstances resulting in default of repayments in the light of the guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mardia Chemicals Case, reported in AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 2371 by setting aside the letters of rejection dt.11-8-2007 of the 2nd Respondent and grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.N.V.ANANTHA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents : MR.ADDEPALLI SURYANARAYANA The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ____________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J Date: 25.03.2008 Note: Furnish CC by tomorrow B/o va