1 mgn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.3 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.871 OF 1994 M/s.Biotor Industries Limited )..PETITIONER Vs,. 1.Union of India & Ors. )..RESPONDENTS Mr. Pankaj A. Sawant with Ms. Trupti M. Kapadia and Mr. V.C. Murlidharan i/b. Joy Legal Consultants for the petitioner. Mr.A.S. Rao for Respondent Nos. 1 and 5. CORAM : FERDINO I. REBELLO & D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 5th February, 2010 P.C. The issue which arises in this Review Petition is similar to the issue in Review Petition No.2 of 2010. For the reasons set out therein we are not inclined to exercise our Review jurisdiction. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners points out to us the typographical error in the order dated 18th September, 2009. In paragraph substitute the date 2 “1-6-1989” by “1-2-1990. Order stands corrected accordingly. Review Petition stands disposed off. 3. It is pointed out that there is no specific direction for refund of the drawback. In para.23 at the end of the paragraph add the following sentence:- The Respondents are, therefore, directed to refund duty drawback for the period from 1st June, 1989 to 31st May, 1990. (D.G. KARNIK,J.) (FERDINO I.REBELLO,J.)