lrtBN^^^^^^ B^ Y [\- } r. ^' •^- HIGHCOURT OFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR DIVISIONBENCH \- "•••^'- ••^' \ "/."••'•.'.' \.:-"; •"•,:.' .• '11 1 ". ~";'.'..:.'. . '".••";'•,.'. 1;." CORAM: HON'BLESHRIRAJEE^<SUPTA,C^.& HON'BLESHRISUNILKUMARSINHA.J. ADDlicant Claimant Respondents M.C^.No. 447 of 2008 Smt. Roopabaj, jW/o Late Shri Maujiram, ^Aged about 46 years, R/o Viliage Gandaghat, Tahsj!& District Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. Narendra Kumar, S/o Chhotelal, Presently R/o Karan Nagar, Durg (C.G.) Permanent address—Clvi!Lines, Raipur (C.©.),.'1.:1;1';1 -;:'1':.' .'1 ! ,.:; 2. Dinesh Chandra Agnihotri, S/o Sharda Prasad Agnihotri, R/o A-7, Ravi Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) ! 3. The Divisional Manager, The New India Insurance Co. jLtd., Parekh Bhavan, Durg(C.G-) ' - ADDlication for Restoration of Miscellaneous Apbea! No.841/2004. wltich has been dismissed on 1/11/2004 fbr welntoTDrosecution. Present: Shri P.R. Patankar, learned counsel forthe petitioner. ORDER sth {15l"September,2008) The foilowing order of the Court was passed by RajeevGupta, C.J. Shri P.R. Patankar, learned counsel for the petjtioner is heard on M.C.P. No. 149772006, a petitlon for condonation of delay in filjng the restoration petition. , . €- i^.: ^.' ;^: 2) On due consideration, we are satisfied that the petitioner has succeeded in showing sufficient cause for the delay in fiting therestoration petitioh. 3) M.C.P. No. 1497/2006, therefore, is alloweij and the deiay in filing the restpration petition js hereby coh<doned. 4) Learned counsel for the petitioner is heard on the •f.'1.'. '/•'•.•••.••/''••• .'.. '••.''-•.'. ? restoration petition. 1 5) The petitioner is seeking restoration jof M.A. No.841/2004 which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 01-11-2004. 6) On due consideration of the suymissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the absenoe of the petitioner's/ appellant's counsel on 01 -11 -2004 when K4.A.No.841 /2004 was taken up fbrhearing,w^sbasedon6onsNegrouhds. 7) M.C.C. No. 447/2006; therefore, te allowed and M.A. No.841/2004 is restored to itsoriginal number; Sd/- ChiefJustice subbu Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge