CWP No. 78/2008 14.07.2011 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. A.G. for the respondents In the affidavit dated 8.7.2011, following averments are made:- “ 1. That the above titled Civil Writ Petition was listed before this Hon’ble High Court on 20.04.2011, when the Hon’ble Court has directed the respondent No.2 to file personal affidavit within a period of two weeks to the effect that the averments made by the petitioner in the petition and more specially grounds B and C need to be replied by the respondents elaborately. It be also clarified as to whether the date on which petitioner was appointed there was any vacant post of TGT (N/M) available in the school or not and also as to whether petitioner’s selection and appointment is in accordance with the policy framed by the Government or not. 2. That in reply to the averments made in para B of the grounds made by the petitioner it is respectfully submitted that the petitioner initially appointed on PTA basis against the post of TGT (Medical) whereas the petitioner is qualified for the post of TGT (Non-Medical). The petitioner has been appointed by the PTA in violation of the instructions of the Government as the post of TGT (Non-Medical) cannot be filled by TGT (Medical) which entirely different stream. The due and admissible salary has been released to the petitioner upto October, 2006 by the institution concerned. Thereafter the regular teacher was posted at Govt. Sr. Sec. School Charidharan and the services of the petitioner on PTA basis stood terminated on the joining of regular incumbent. 3. That it is further submitted that the regular teacher Sh. Ashok Kumar TGT (Medical) was transferred from Govt. Sr. Sec. School Charidharan on 23.7.2006 and the post of TGT (Medical) was once again fallen vacant. The PTA of the school again decided to re-engage the petitioner on PTA basis against the post of TGT (Medical). The replying respondent has decided that since the petitioner was working in the school may be against the post of TGT (Medical) to release his due and admissible salary as per GIA rules, 2006. The Principal concerned has been directed to submit the proposal for releasing of Grant-in-aid to the petitioner at the earliest. 4. That in reply to averment made in para C of the grounds it is submitted that on the receipt of the proposal for releasing of Grant-in-aid to the petitioner the grant due and admissible in favour of the petitioner will be released to the institution concerned for making further payment to the petitioner.” 2. Thus, it is apparent that the respondents have decided to grant relief prayed for. It is expected of the respondents to do the needful within a reasonable period of time and in any event not later than three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. In view of above, no other and further orders are required to be passed in the present petition and the same stands disposed of. July 14, 2011 ( Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.