IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.124 of 2009 ---- Sardar Ekbal Singh @ Sardar Ikbal Singh, son of Late Sardar Mohan Singh of M/s New Janta Crockery, Ram Krishna Avenue (Nala Road) of Mohalla- Kadamkuan, Police Station- Kadamkuan, District & Town-Patna. --Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. Versus Ram Ranjan Prasad, son of Sachidanand Prasad, resident of Uma Homeo Clinic Opposite Angan Apartment, Congress Maidan Road, Kadamkuan, P.O.& P.S. Kadamkuan in the town and District-Patna. -- Plaintiff-Respondent-Opposite Party. ----- For the petitioner : M/s Sadat Ali Khan & Kumar Harshbardhan, Advocates. For the opposite party : None. ---- 03. 13.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This case has been filed for review of order dated 25.03.2009 by which this court dismissed Second Appeal No.282 of 2008 at the stage of hearing under Order XLI Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 3. The matter arises out of Eviction Suit No.38 of 1997 which was filed by the opposite party for eviction of the petitioner on various grounds. The said suit having been decreed the tenant defendant filed Title Appeal No.02 of 2003 which was dismissed, whereafter the tenant-defendant filed the aforementioned S.A.No.282 of 2008 which was also dismissed by this court vide order dated 25.03.2009, review of which is sought in this case. 4. The point raised in this review petition is with regard to the postal acknowledgement of the money order said to have been sent by the petitioner to the opposite party. It was discarded by both - 2 - the learned courts below holding it to be not legal and genuine, as it was blank on the space of post office seal and was without any date also and no postal receipt with respect thereto was produced. The said exhibit could not disprove the findings of the learned courts below and hence on that ground also the second appeal was dismissed. 5. Furthermore, this court does not find any error apparent on the face of record, nor does it find any fresh material which was not available with the petitioner earlier, nor this court finds any other material to take a different view. Accordingly, this civil review petition is dismissed. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)