IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18812 of 2011 Shakil Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3 5.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is also one of the assailants of the deceased as well as of the informant and one Motto Murmu. Defence is that petitioner was armed with Lathi and no such injury is found on the person of the deceased as stated by one of the injured in paragraph 67 of the case diary but statement of informant is there in the F.I.R. about petitioner’s having in possession of sharp cut weapon, informant is also injured, his father is dead. Co-injured is examined in paragraph 67 what was its purpose known to the I.O. but has created some doubt on his conduct, in any case not doubting the prosecution case. Having similar allegation co-accused Abdul Mobin and Haji Abdul Quadir have been refused bail by different Benches of this Court vide Cr.Misc.No. 16995/2011 and Cr.Misc.No. 32877/2010. Taking the facts into consideration, the prayer for bail is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)