IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC (T) No.: 55 of 2008. Decided on: 28.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Avinesh Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus Anil Thakur and another. … Respondents/Contemnors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents- Contemnors : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): It has come in para 4 of preliminary submissions of the reply that the petitioner has been reengaged on work with effect from 24.4.2001 as per Annexure R-1. Consequently, the present petition is rendered infructuous and the same is accordingly dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 28, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?