IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1930 RP.No. 951 of 2008(B) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.19963/2008 Dated 02/07/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ----------------------------------------------------- M/S. SIDA RUBBER GOODS TRAINING CENTRE, REG. NO. K 135/92, KOOVAPPALLY KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, 686 513, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT AND MANAGING DIRECTOR GEORGE THOMAS. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS ------------------------------------------------- 1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, PONKUNNAM CIRCLE II, KANJIRAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KANJIRAPPALLY TALUK, KOTTAYAM. 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, (APPELLATE) COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOTTAYAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI C.K. GOVINDAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- R.P.NO.951 OF 2008 IN W.P.C. NO. 19963 OF 2008 B ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th November, 2008 ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. Complaint in the Review Petition is that there was a prayer in the Writ Petition, namely the third prayer for early disposal of Ext.P10 Appeal and it was omitted to be pointed out by the petitioner. Learned Government Pleader points out that the Appeal was filed in May, 2007 and the Appeal can be disposed of. Accordingly, the Review Petition is allowed and the Judgment is modified as follows: There will be a direction to the third respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P10 Appeal in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. Sd/= K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge