IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25892 of 2010 1. LAL MUNI DEVI WIFE OF UTTAM PRASAD, 2. UTTAM PRASAD SON OF SHYAM LAL SAH, 3. RAJU PRASAD SON OF SHYAM LAL SAH. ALL R/O VILLAGE BHARIHANI, P.S.VALMIKI NAGAR, DISTRICT-WEST CHAMPARAN. -PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR -OPP.PARTY 2 24.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The three petitioners are named accused in this case carry allegation of demanding undue gratification from the informant to provide benefit of Indira Awas Yojna which is denied to him inspite of listed in BPL. But, as pointed out the informant does not qualify to be listed in the BPL list. Considering the facts and circumstances, the three petitioners, in the event or their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran, in Valmiki Nagar P.S. Case no. 31 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioners no.2 and 3 shall remain present on each and every date before the court below at least for one year or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad