1 wp 6792.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6792 OF 2011 Deelip Khandoji Pole .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri S. G. Jadhavar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. M. A. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Respondent No. 6. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 08TH SEPTEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard Shri Jadhavar, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Kulkarni, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 6 raises preliminary objection stating that against the impugned order the petitioner has got remedy of revision before the State Government. 2. Taking into account the fact that as contended by the respondent, the petitioner has an alternate remedy before the State Government, I am not inclined to entertain the petition. 2 wp 6792.11 The petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy available to him. Needless to state that I have not considered any of the submissions on merits and the petitioner is entitled to raise all the submissions before the revisional authority. The revisional authority shall also consider the time spent in prosecuting the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Sept. 11