1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2803 OF 2010 ASARAMKISANWAGHMODE AGE 70 , OCC.; AGRICULTURE, R/O : GANDHELI, TQ. & DIST. AURANGABAD ... PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF MAHAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY INDUSTRIES ENERGY AND LABOUR DEPARTMENT, MANTRALAYA MUMBAI 2. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND COLLECTOR OF STAMPS M.S. PUNE GROUNG FLOOR OPP. TO VIDHAN BHAVAN NEW ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING PUNE 3. DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AURANGABAD DIVISION CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING 2ND FLOOR COLLECTOR OFFICE COMPOUND, AURANGABAD. 4. REGIONAL OFFICER, M.I.D.C. AURANGABAD .... RESPONDENTS 2 Mr. M.S.Karad, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.V.Kurundkar, Additional Govt. Pleader for State. Mr. S.P.Bhosale, Advocate for respondent no. 4. CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & S.V.GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE OF JUDGMENT : 03/05/2010 ORAL JUDGMENT : ( PER – S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns the communication made by the respondents, whereby the respondents have refused to register the sale deed on the ground that the said property is in special economic zone. 3. It has been brought to our notice that the earlier Circular issued, by virtue of which the sale deed were not been registered, has been withdrawn pursuant to the Circular dated 4/2/2010. In such circumstances, nothing survives in the present petition. 4. In the light of the above, we direct the respondents to register the instrument of conveyance if submitted by the petitioner and 3 if otherwise it complies with all other formalities. 5. Rule is thus made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. [ S.V.GANGAPURWALA ] [ P.V.HARDAS ] JUDGE JUDGE knp/WP 2803.10 ( J )