IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.837 of 2009 1. SUMAN SINGH, S/O- SRI RAM NARESH SINGH 2. NAVIN SINGH, S/O- SRI RAJENDRA SINGH 3. SANJEEV SINGH, S/O- SRI JAWAHAR SINGH 4. JAWAHAR SINGH, S/O- LATE LADDU SINGH 5. BASHISTHA NARAYAN SINGH, S/O- LATE SITARAM SINGH 6. RAM NARESH SINGH, S/O- LATE LADDU SINGH ALL R/O- VILLAGE MAHADDIPUR, P.S.- MUNGER, P.S.- KASIM BAZAR, DISTRICT- MUNGER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioner : Mr. Suman Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. M. Rab, APP 2 15.04.2011 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioners are aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 26th February, 2009 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No. III, Munger on Cr. Appeal No. 10 of 2005 whereby the appeal stood dismissed and the judgment and order of conviction dated 25.12.2004/27.12.2004 passed in G.R. No. 517/1997 has been affirmed. Learned Trial Court, on perusal of the materials on record, found and held them guilty under Sections 323, 324 and 341 of the Penal Code and released them on due admonitions under Section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act. Section 12 of the Probation of Offenders Act reads as under: “12. Removal of disqualification attaching to conviction—Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law, a person found guilty of an offence and dealt with under the provisions of section 3 or section 4 shall not suffer disqualification, if any, attaching to a conviction of an offence under such law. Provided that nothing in this section shall apply to a person who, after his release under section 4, is subsequently sentenced for the original offence.” - 2 - In that view of the mater, this Court declines to interfere with the judgment and order impugned. The application stands disposed of. pkj (Kishore K. Mandal, J)