IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 8TH MARCH 2011 / 17TH PHALGUNA 1932 RP.No. 162 of 2011(S) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.10662/2010 Dated 03/02/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): --------------------------------- R.V.BABU, NALINAM, NEAR MOOKAMBI TEMPLE N.PARAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DIST BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY CHIEF SECRETARY SECRETARIAT, THRIUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 2. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 3. KERALA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, KAWADIYAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION KAWADIYAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003 4. AL BARAKAH FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD, REGD.OFFICE:2ND FLOOR,CHOCIE TOWERS, MANORAMA JUNCTION, KOCHI-682019 REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR C.K.MENON 5. UNION OF INDIA REP.BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT MINISTRY OF FINANCE,NEW DELHI-110001 6. THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, REP.BY GOVERNOR RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, MUMBAI-400001 7. INDIAN CENTRE FOR ISLAMIC FINANCE(ICIF) D.309,ABDUL FAZAL ENCLAVE, JAMIA NAGAR,OKHLA, NEW DELHI-110025 REP.BYITS GENERAL SECRETARY, H.ABDR RAQEEB THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/03/2011, ALONG WITH I.A.NO.149/2011 IN ZRP NO. 149 OF 2011 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J. CHELAMESWAR, C.J & P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ---------------------------------------------- R.P.No. 162 of 2011 & I.A.No.149 of 2011 in RP.No. of 2011(unnumbered) ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of March, 2011 O R D E R J.Chelameswar,CJ. This is an application seeking review of a judgment of this Court dated 3rd February, 2011 in W.P(C).No.10662 of 2010. In our opinion, the Review Application reads more like a memorandum of appeal. While we acknowledge the right of the petitioner not to agree with the judgment, we are of the opinion that the recourse open to the petitioner is only to seek correction of the said judgment by availing appropriate procedure prescribed under the law before the appropriate forum. Review applications are not meant to be an occasion for a rehearing of the entire case. 2. Other grievance of the petitioner is that he made certain written submission before this Court at the time of hearing and according to the petitioner, the content of the written submission was not adverted to in the judgment. As a matter of fact, we acknowledged that a written submission was made by the petitioner. The question whether the written submission was taken into consideration or not is a matter of opinion and we are of the opinion that all the relevant materials were taken into consideration before the judgment in 2 question was rendered. We are of opinion that the review does not merit any consideration. The same is dismissed. I.A.No.149 of 2011 in R.P.No. of 2011(unnumbered) is also dismissed. J.CHELAMESWAR, CHIEF JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE vgs