^'^ ^ WPC-^7-5^-/5,007 HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BiLASPUR DIVSiON BENCH COF<AM; HON'BLE SHRI JAGDiSH BHALLA, Ag.CJ. HON'BLE SHR! SATiSH K. AGN'HOTR!, J. it Petition (Ci {PRi No.1082 of 2007 Petitioner DP Sharaf, S/o Khatanand Sharaf Aged 48 years, R/o QR No.22, 15 Siock, SECL Colony, Korba (CG) Versus Respondents Siate of Chhattisgarh through She Chtef Sscrstary, Raipur VVrit Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India Present: Petitioner in person. Shri GD Vaswani, Government Advocate for the State. (..- \\ ^. (Passedon17irl October, 2007) foilowing oral order of the Court was passed by Hon'bie Jagdish Bhaila, Ag. CJ. An objection has been raised by the Registry that language of the High Court is English, therefore, this petition fiied In Hindi cannot be acceDted. Notification issued bv the State Government under 5*:r?E. 34e 'Article 3+8 of the Constitution of india has bsen placed before us, wherein use of Hindi language in all the proceedings of the Hlgh Court has been ailowed subject to certain conditions, nameiy, (i) if the High Court so desires, sDecifsc orders for translation into Enalish, the affiaavits, statements and documsnts in Hindi shall be translated in ingiish; (i!) judgment contains extracts from pleading, statements, documents etc., shall be accompanied by transiation of the same in Engiish language. For these conditions, the High Court or a particular :^.,,~/<,i'^-VK-.s'g^'C,'--f^^ -: ^^ -2. subbu l-.t.B Bench may issue orders from case to case or in general as the requirement may be. Therefore, the objection of the Registry is rejected. Learned Advocate General has indicated certain Rules. Since -3^8 the Notlfication is under Articie 3+8 of the Constitution of India, the same wili override the Ru!es. With the aforesaid obsen/ation, the petition stands disposed ot'. Sd/- Acting Chief Justice Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ;/n