1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.264 OF 2011 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.808 OF 2005 WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.265 OF 2011 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.809 OF 2005 S.S.Engineers Petitioner and Hydroair Tectonics (PCD) Limited Applicant versus The Official Liquidator of Hydroair Tectonics (PCD) Ltd. (In Liquidation) Respondent Mr.K.H.Halai a/w Mrunalini Pavchal i/by M/s.Halai & Co. for petitioner. Mr.Janak Dwarkadas, Sr.Counsel with Kunal Vajani, Pranaya Goyal i/by M/s.Wadiia, Ghandy & Co. for applicant/respondent company. Dr.T.Pandian, Official Liquidator present. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 29th July 2011 PC : 1. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 8th July 2011 the Official Liquidator has advertised the proposed withdrawal and invited claims from the workers/creditors of the respondent company in the same newspapers in which admission of the petition was advertised. The Official Liquidator informs the Court that he has not received any claims in response to the said advertisement. In view thereof, Company Application Nos.264 of 2011 and 265 of 2011 are allowed in terms of prayer clause (c). The Official Liquidator is discharged on payment of his costs, charges and expenses. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) 2 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO.808 OF 2005 WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.809 OF 2005 Hydroair Tectonics (PCD) Limited Petitioner versus The Official Liquidator of Hydroair Tectonics (PCD) Ltd. (In Liquidation) Respondent Mr.K.H.Halai a/w Mrunalini Pavchal i/by M/s.Halai & Co. for petitioner. Mr.Janak Dwarkadas, Sr.Counsel with Kunal Vajani, Pranaya Goyal i/by M/s.Wadiia, Ghandy & Co. for applicant/respondent company. Dr.T.Pandian, Official Liquidator present. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 29th July 2011 PC : 1. Learned advocate for the petitioner informs the Court that the claim of the petitioner in both the above company petitions is settled and that the petitioner now has no claim of whatsoever nature against the respondent company. He submits that in view thereof the petitioner be allowed to withdraw both the above company petitions. 2. In view thereof, the company petitions are disposed of as withdrawn. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)