IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 548 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 548 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 548 OF 2008 Deepak Prakash Gopal.... Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & ors....... Respondent. Shri Vinod Wagh for the petitioner Ms. M.H.Mhatre APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 13TH MARCH, 2008 DATED; 13TH MARCH, 2008 DATED; 13TH MARCH, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The writ petition filed is wholly misconceived. The same is directed only agaisnt a show cause notice issued under section 111 of the Bombay Police Act. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, tried to contend that the case is fixed today for executing the interim bond without granting any opportunity to the petitioner of being heard. Th learned APP on instructions from the investigating officer informes that today the case is fixed for filing of reply. There is no order directing the petitioner to execute the interim bond. In this view of the matter the writ petition is dismissed being pre-mature. ....