1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R Smt. Jamna & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan S.B.CR.MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.2916/2007 DATE OF ORDER :: July 06, 2007 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr.Doongar Singh, for the petitioners. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. Mr.Gopilal Dhaka, for the complainant. BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by counsel appearing for the complainant. Perused the order impugned and the police investigation diary. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that mere saying by the accused “Go and Die”, it cannot be said that victim was seduced to commit suicide. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that there is an evidence in the police investigation diary that the petitioners, who are mother-in-law and “Jethani” (wife of elder brother of 2 deceased's husband) repeatedly used to harass the deceased on account of the fact that the deceased could not deliver a child and harassment was to the extent that either she would leave the matrimonial home or go and die. There had been a telephonic conversation between the deceased and her mother three days prior to the occurrence that she is being harassed by the petitioners on account of not delivering a child and repeatedly the petitioners used to say that if she could not deliver a child, she should leave the matrimonial home and, therefore, the deceased committed suicide as stated by the learned Public Prosecutor. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner No.2 is residing separately as she is (Jethani) wife of elder brother of deceased's husband. Be that as it may, there is specific allegation against the petitioners regarding harassment to the deceased, in my view, it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The bail application filed by the petitioners under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-