IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1841 of 2011 (O & M) Date of decision: 05.12.2011 Balwant Singh .... Petitioner Versus Gulzar Singh and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Ms. Sumiti, Advocate, for Ms. Ritu Punj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Cheema, Sr. DAG, Punjab. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.: (Oral) This Court on 3rd June, 2011 while disposing of CWP No.10737 of 2011 had directed the respondents to decide the representation filed by the petitioner and to take appropriate action thereon, in accordance with law, within a period one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. The grievance of the petitioner is that the same has not been complied with. 2. Learned State counsel was directed to seek instructions as to why the representation of the petitioner, has not been decided. 3. A short reply by way of an affidavit of Balwinder Singh, IAS, Director Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab, has been filed in Court today. Same is taken on record. A copy thereof has been given to learned counsel for the petitioner. In the reply, it has been stated that the representation has been decided on 01.11.2010 and in pursuance thereto, recovery has also been made from Sarpanch-Amarjit Kaur, Gram Panchayat, Block Ludhiana-II, District Ludhiana, for causing financial loss to the Gram Panchayat. 4. In view of the above, no further action is called for in the present petition. Same stands disposed of. 5. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the legal remedies, in accordance with law, in case, any grievance subsists. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE December 05, 2011 sukhpreet