1 Wp2306.11 Kambli IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2306 OF 2011 ... Anklesh Sudhakar Bhoir ...Petitioner v/s. State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents ... Mr.R.K.Mendadkar for the Petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for State. Mr.Ameya Gokhale i/b Khaitan & Co. for Respondent No.3. ... CORAM: D.K.Deshmukh & Anoop V. Mohta, JJ DATED: 2nd May, 2011 P.C.: 1. Rule. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2. By consent of parties, the order of the Scrutiny Committee impugned in the petition is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Scrutiny Committee for denovo consideration. 3. The Petitioner will appear before the Scrutiny Committee on 16th May, 2011 and submit his explanation as to why Scrutiny Committee should not defer from the view 2 Wp2306.11 expressed by the Vigilance Cell in its report. 4. It is made clear that it will not be necessary for the Scrutiny Committee to issue any show cause notice to that effect to the Petitioner. The order of the Scrutiny Committee that we have set aside is to be treated as show cause notice. 5. The Scrutiny Committee shall consider the explanation submitted by the Petitioner and other relevant records and make a fresh order in relation to the validity of the caste claim of the Petitioner. The Scrutiny Committee shall make that order positively within a period of two months from 16th May, 2011. The Respondent No.3 shall not cancel the selection of the Petitioner till the Scrutiny Committee makes a fresh order. 6. Rule made absolute accordingly. Petition disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.)