// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2890/2007 Sishram S/o Nakta Ram and Another Versus The Additional Civil Judge (Jr.Div.) No.3, Bharatpur and Others Date of Order ::: 04.07.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Sunil Kumar Singodiya, Counsel for petitioners #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Petitioners have preferred this writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 15th January, 2007 passed by the trial court whereby the application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, filed by the plaintiff-respondent Chet Ram was allowed and the petitioners were impleaded as defendants in the suit. The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance in the trial court in respect of the disputed property. During the pendency of the suit, the disputed land was sold to the present petitioners and on that basis the plaintiff filed the application to implead them as party, under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. The learned trial // 2 // court allowed the application. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners in the light of the reasons assigned by the trial court for allowing the application vide impugned order dated 15.01.2007 and, after considering the same, I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the impugned order so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//