21.7.2008 Present: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A. G. for respondent No. 1. CWP No.1137/2008 This writ petition is directed against the order of transfer. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has only completed one year tenure. Inspite of the same, he has been transferred. Further, there are some doctors who have completed more than three years, are still working at their place of posting. It has also been alleged that the transfer of the petitioner is against the transfer policy. The petitioner has been transferred during mid term. It has been vehemently argued that the son of the petitioner is studying in class 10th and, therefore, his study will be affected. In light of various judgments of the Apex Court, this Court can show interference in transfer order, if there is a ground of violation of law or strong case of malafide. There is no such foundation in the pleadings. We are of the considered opinion that transfer policy will not come in the way of the State Government to transfer the petitioner before completing three years’ tenure. As far as other Doctors are concerned who, according to the petitioner had completed more than three years, no details have been furnished before this Court. Further, as far as the study of the petitioner’s son is concerned, there is nothing on record to substantiate that his son is studying in class 10th and his academic session starts in the month of March. Inspite of the same for such grounds, it is the employer who can grant relief to the petitioner and not by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, it is open to the petitioner to approach the State Government, if he so desires. We are of the considered opinion that the transfer of the petitioner cannot be said to be in violation of the transfer policy. In light of the above discussion, no interference is warranted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. With these observations, the writ petition stands dismissed, so also the pending application. ` ( Jagdish Bhalla ), C.J. ( Sanjay Karol ), J. July 21, 2008 (rana)