IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE LPA No. 91 of 2006 with Civil application No. 112 of 2006 Shamji Khimji Shah ... Appellant vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ... respondents with LPA No. 97 of 2006 with Civil application No. 119 of 2006 M/s. Kalabharati Development Corporation ... Appellant vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ... respondents and LPA No. 98 of 2006 with Civil application No. 120 of 2006 Miss Kalpana Shamji Shah ... Appellant vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ... respondents Ms. Deepa Chavan i/b. Little & Company for appellants None for respondents. CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & MRS. ROSHAN DALVI JJ. DATE:2/5/2006 P.C.: In view of the fact that no order, either granting or refusing interim relief, except Rule having been issued by the learned Single Judge, at this stage no LPA would lie and the same being the factual situation, on oral motion made by the Learned Advocate for the appellant, the appeals and the applications are allowed to be withdrawn. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on any of the appeals or applications. The appeals and the applications stand disposed of. (MRS. ROSHAN DALVI J.)(R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR J.)