1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.:4291 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.:4291 OF 2011 *** Nimba Lakha Dhangar And Ors VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Ors *** Mr. P.B.patil, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi, A.G.P. for Respondent/State Authorities *** 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned A.G.P. for the State. 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to Respondent Nos.4 to 7 to pay compensation with interest as prayed for in the representation dated 24th February, 2009. In our opinion, the prayer for seeking compensation, made in the writ petition, in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, cannot be granted. In view thereof, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks direction to Respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 24th February, 2009. Having considered the 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.:4291 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, we are satisfied that the following order shall meet the ends of justice: (a) Respondent No.5 shall consider the petitioners' representation dated 24th February, 2009 on merits in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of twelve weeks from today. Respondent No.5, if necessary, shall seek assistance of Respondent Nos.6 and 7 for deciding the representation within the stipulated time. (b) With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. (c) It is made clear that we have not examined merits of the case. [S. B. DESHMUKH, J.] [D. B. BHOSALE, J.] Dated:25/07/2011. ans/4291