IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1574 of 2009 Ranjeet Kumar son of Lallan Prasad Singh, resident of 37/800, Shastri Nagar, P.O. and P.S. Shastri Nagar, District Patna. … O.P./Petitioner. Versus 1. Swati wife of Ranjeet Kumar & daughter of Late Bhogendra Jha, 2. Prajjwal minor son of Ranjeet Kumar residing along with swati, Both resident of 37/800, Shastri nagar, P.O. and P.S. Shastri Nagar, District and Town Patna at present residing at Raja Niwas, First Floor , K. M. Singh Lane near Vishnu Palace, Boring Canal Road, Patna, P.S. Budha Colony, District Patna. 3. The State of Bihar. … Petitioners/Opp. Parties. ----------- 2. 18.08.2011 The husband-petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against the order dated 24th August 2009 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna in Maintenance Case No. 71(M) of 2007 by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.1500/- per month to his wife and Rs.1000/- per month to his minor son as interim maintenance and a sum of Rs.5000/- as cost of the proceeding. Heard learned counsel for both the parties. It appears that the main case under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for final maintenance is 2 still pending. The petitioner may raise all his grievance before the learned Principal Judge at the time of final hearing. Impugned order has been passed on 24th August 2009 and it has been submitted that evidence on behalf of wife- opposite party has already been given and the case is pending for the evidence of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This application stands disposed of. Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)