IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CM No.9367-C-2010 and RSA No.4065 of 2006(O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 27.08.2010 **** Mamu Ram and another . . . . Appellants VS. Raj Kumar and others . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: - Mr.V.K. Jindal, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.Pritam Saini, Advocate for the respondents. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL) This is an application filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘CPC’) for disposal of the appeal in view of the compromise already placed on record vide CM No.7989-C-2010 which was allowed on 02.08.2010. Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants submits that the trial Court had dismissed the suit of the plaintiff for permanent injunction which has been reversed by the First Appellate Court. Notice in the application. At this stage, Mr.Pritam Saini, Advocate appearing on behalf of plaintiff/respondent No.1-Raj Kumar, who is also present in Court, accepts notice and also accepts that the matter has been finally settled between the parties by virtue of the compromise, which has already taken on record vide order dated 02.08.2010. Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants submits that this appeal may be allowed in terms of compromise and compromise may be ordered to be made part of the decree. Learned counsel for the plaintiff/respondent No.1 submits that the statement made by learned counsel for the applicant/appellant may be accepted and the appeal may be disposed of in terms of compromise which is already on record and decree be drawn in terms of the compromise. I order accordingly. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 27.08.2010 JUDGE Vivek