WP6000/10 (1) agk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6000 OF 2010 Dada Macchindra Choudhar & Anr .. Petitioners versus The Sub Divisional Officer & Ors .. Respondents Mr.S.M.Oak i/by Mr.Sagar A. Joshi for the petitioners. Mr.S.D.Rayarikar, A.G.P for respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 29th September 2010. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. The challenge in this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to the orders passed by the authorities under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 in the proceedings relating to the mutation entries. 2 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the effect of the impugned order is that the mutation entry made on the basis of a decree of the Civil Court has been set aside. He submitted that the authorities under the said Code cannot set aside the mutation entry made on the basis of decree of Civil Court. 3 Perusal of the impugned order shows that the order of the revisional WP6000/10 (2) authority is specifically made subject to final outcome of the two civil suits to which a reference is made in the impugned order. In any event mutation entries are made only for fiscal purposes and while deciding the dispute as regards mutation entries, the authorities under the said Code have no jurisdiction to decide issue of title claimed by the parties. Notwithstanding the orders passed by the authorities under the said Code, the parties can always approach Civil Court and establish their title in respect of the property in dispute. Subject to what is observed above, no case for interference is made out. Writ petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J)