IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-22877 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 13, 2010. Mamta and others ...... PETITIONERS Versus State of Haryana and another ...... RESPONDENTS CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Raghujeet Singh Madan, Advocate for the applicants-petitioners. Mr. Ranvir Singh Arya, D.A.G., Haryana. Mr. S.S.Dinarpur, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) CRM No.23323 of 2010 Learned counsel for the applicants-petitioners requests for placing on record affidavit of respondent No.2 as Annexure P7. The same is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. CRM stands disposed of. CRM No.M-22877 of 2009(O&M) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of FIR No.193, dated 19.08.2008 CRM No.M-22877 of 2009 under Sections 323/506/34 IPC registered at Police Station Baldev Nagar, District Ambala, Annexure P5, and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record. It has been stated by learned counsel for the parties that initially respondent No.2 – complainant had contested this petition and however, during the pendency of this petition compromise has been effected between the parties. It is further contended by learned counsel for the parties that parties are related to each other and due to intervention of respectable persons and relatives from both the sides, matter has been settled. Respondent No.2 – complainant also appeared in person with his counsel admitting the factum of compromise and stating that he is having no objection if the FIR and consequential proceedings are quashed. In appropriate cases FIR can be quashed on the basis of compromise by exercising power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are not compoundable. It was so held by Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab, 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052. Since the parties have amicably settled the matter and compromise has been effected between them due to intervention of the respectable persons and relatives, in the interest of harmonious relations between the parties, the present petition is allowed and the impugned FIR No. 193, dated 19.08.2008 under Sections 323/506/34 IPC registered at Police Station Baldev Nagar, District Ambala, Annexure P5, alongwith all consequential proceedings qua petitioners – Mamta, Baldev Raj, Rajni, 2 CRM No.M-22877 of 2009 Kirpal Chand, Rajesh Kumar, Sunil Kumar @Bittu and Darshan Lal is, hereby, quashed. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) May 13, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 3