FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5810 OF 2008 with CIVIL APPLICATION St.NO.14984 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5810 OF 2008. ___________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|___________________________________ This matter was mentioned by the learned Counsel for the petitioners at 2.30 p.m. today and by consent of the parties, it is taken for final hearing at 4.30 p.m. 2 Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners. He submits that the controversy between the parties is settled between the petitioners and respondent No.1. He further submits that the petitioner Mr. Laxman Khema Jadhav is present in the Court. Respondent No.1 Bhimrao Kishanrao Rathod is also present in the court. On query by this Court, the petitioners as well as Respondent No.1 state that the dispute between the petitioners and respondent no.1 is amicably settled. The learned Counsel for the petitioners tenders copy of the Civil Application St.No.14984 of 2009 with Exh.X, which narrates compromise terms. The said civil application is taken on record. 3 The Civil Application is verified by the petitioner as well as respondent no. 1. Though the learned Advocate for respondent no.1 is not present, on perusal of the civil application it appears that he has signed the verification at page no.6 identifying Respondent no.1. The learned A.G.P. appearing for Respondent No.2 has no objection to dispose of this petition in view of the compromise arrived between the petitioners and respondent no.1. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and disposed of. (S.S. SHINDE, J). 20.7.2009. PLK/#