IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 8063 of 2008 Date of decision:- 16.12.2009. Yoginder Singh ...Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. K.K. Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ranjana Shahi, Central Govt. Standing Counsel for the respondents. K.KANNAN J.(Oral) On a medical invalidation, made by the Medical Board, to a Constable, working in Indo Tibet Border Police Force, the writ petition has been filed challenging the notice issued by the Commandant to point out to any error in the judgment of the Medical Board. The impugned notice itself offers to the petitioner an opportunity to produce such evidence within a period of 30 days to enable the decision to be taken on the basis of such representation with proof. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the representation has been made with sufficient evidence pointing out to the errors of the Medical Board's findings and the final decision does not appear to have been taken yet. Having regard to the inconclusiveness relating to the medical invalidation of the petitioner and the further fact that the CWP No. 8063 of 2008 -2- impugned notice itself does not affirm the decision of the Medical Board regarding invalidation, the writ petition is dismissed, however, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court again if he is aggrieved by the decision that may be taken pursuant to the representation, that has been given after the impugned notice was received by him. No costs. December 16, 2009 ( K. KANNAN ) vj JUDGE