IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3178 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 3178 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 3178 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (LODG) NO. 493 OF 2005 (LODG) NO. 493 OF 2005 (LODG) NO. 493 OF 2005 IN IN IN SHOW SHOW SHOW CAUSE NOTICE NO. 8 OF 2005 CAUSE NOTICE NO. 8 OF 2005 CAUSE NOTICE NO. 8 OF 2005 IN IN IN SHOW SHOW SHOW CAUSE NOTICE NO. 7 OF 2005 CAUSE NOTICE NO. 7 OF 2005 CAUSE NOTICE NO. 7 OF 2005 IN IN IN COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY PETITION NO. 166 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 166 OF 2002 PETITION NO. 166 OF 2002 State Bank of Indore ] .. Appellant Versus The Official Liquidator ] .. Respondent Mr. Rishabh Shah with Mr. D.M. Thakkar i/b M/s. Pragna Thakkar & Co. for the appellant. Mr. P. Ramarao- Official Liquidator present. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & S.A. BOBDE, JJ. DATED: 25TH SEPTEMBER, 2006 P.C. : . The appellant has preferred this Appeal against the order dated January 12, 2006 passed by the learned Company Judge. The Appeal suffers from delay of 122 days. The delay is sought to be explained by submitting that the copy of the impugned order was received in Delhi on 21st January, 2006 and, thereafter, the judgment was examined, considered, vetted and opined : 2 : by different levels of hierarchy and various legal professionals situate at Delhi, Indore and Mumbai and that consumed the time of about two months. 2. Mr. P. Ramarao, the Official Liquidator is present in the Court and he does not have any serious objection if delay in filing the Appeal is condoned. We are satisfied with the cause and accordingly condone the delay. Office is directed to process the Appeal and post it for admission as soon as it is numbered. . Notice of Motion stands disposed of. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [S.A. [S.A. [S.A. BOBDE, J.] BOBDE, J.] BOBDE, J.]