IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.M.JAMES FRIDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2007 / 13TH MAGHA 1928 WP(C).No. 34028 of 2006(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SAJEEVAN.C.V., CHERUKUNNEL HOUSE, MANNARKAYAM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. ASSISTANT MANAGER, RUBCO SREEKANDAPURAM LATEX (P) LTD. BY ADV. SRI.H.BADARUDDIN SRI.C.A.JOSEPH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, RUBCO SREEKANDAPURAM LATEX (P) LTD., 4TH FLOOR, K.V.R.TOWERS, SOUTH BAZAR, KANNUR-670 002. 3. THE MANAGER (PERSONAL & ADMINISTRATION), RUBCO SREEKANDAPURAM LATEX (P) LTD., 4TH FLOOR, K.V.R.TOWERS, SOUTH BAZAR, KANNUR-670 002. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.P.K.RAVIKRISHNAN FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 34028 of 2006(A) APPENDIX EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.RUB/HO/A&P/SLPL/03/B-286, DATED 04/05/2006 EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELIEVING ORDER DATED 28/04/2006 EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11/08/2003 EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 01/06/2006 EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 05/11/2006 \\TRUE COPY// J.M.JAMES, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 34028 of 2006 (A) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2007 J U D G M E N T The writ petitioner was working under the second respondent, from 01/04/1997 to 04/05/2006. He was relieved from the service on the latter date. He has made Exhibit P4 representation dated 01/06/2006 before the second respondent for payment of gratuity. Similarly, he also made Exhibit P5 representation dated 05/11/2006, requesting for the payment of Rs.17,532/- towards Earned Leave Surrender. The writ petitioner complaints that Exhibits P4 and P5 are not so far considered and, therefore, prays for a direction to the second respondent, to consider the representations and pass appropriate orders, within a time limit. 2. Though the service is complete, there is no representation from respondents 2 and 3, except the Senior Government Pleader representing the first respondent. In the above facts situation, I dispose of the writ petition directing the second respondent to consider Exhibits P4 W.P.(C) No.34028/2006 (A) 2 and P5, and pass orders on it, on merit, after hearing the writ petitioner, within two months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment before the second respondent. (J.M.JAMES) Judge ms