THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.270 of 2004 ORDER: The petitioner states that he was engaged on daily wage basis b Laxmi Narasimha Swamy Temple, Yadagirigutta, upto 1998. Stating th was discontinued abruptly, he filed the writ petition seeking two-fold namely, that the appointment/engagement of respondent Nos.3 and declared as illegal and that the Devasthanam be directed to appoint him back wages. Devasthanam filed counter affidavit denying the allegations. stated that the petitioner was engaged on few occasions on daily basis and there is no provision for regularization of the services of persons. As regards respondent Nos.2 and 3, it is stated that they been continuing on temporary basis since a long time in the temple. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned co for the respondents. It may be true that the petitioner was engaged as a daily employee for some time. However, it does not give rise to any right fo petitioner to be regularized. Even respondent Nos.3 and 4 were employed on regular basis. The engagement of persons on daily basis would depend upon the availability of work and the nature o orders that are in force from time to time. Devasthanam passed an order, dated 28.02.2004, o representation made by the petitioner, observing that there is a ban eve appointing persons on NMR or DLR basis. It is not known as to situation prevails at present. In case, there exists any work in Devasthanam that warrants engagement of the workers on daily wage b the case of the petitioner can also be considered. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the Devasth shall consider the case of the petitioner as and when it intends to engag workers on daily wage basis. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDD Date:30.09.2010 VGB