IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37803 of 2009 MD.MOKIM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.10.2009 Heard Shri Virendra Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner and Shri Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State. The case relates to administering some stupefying substances to the driver and cleaner of the tractor and trailer which was carrying a consignment of stone chips and other building material and taking away the vehicle. The petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. but he appears arrested and during the questioning he appears confessing and pointing out the place where the vehicle could be found. Accordingly, the tractor and trailer were recovered. The petitioner was put on the T.I. Parade and the proprietor Harishankar Chaudhary who had sent the consignment identified the petitioner as the person who had transacted the purchase. The contention is that the driver and cleaner also participated in the T.I. Parade but they did not identify the 2 petitioner and that the story of confession and recovery of the tractor and trailer is wrong and false. The contention further was that the petitioner is in custody since 4.8.2009. On perusal of the record and hearing counsel for the parties what the Court finds is that it is not the solitary act of the petitioner that has been reported. There is a huge number of criminal cases against the petitioner as per the rejection order which makes a reference to a particular paragraph of the case diary. The allegation appears serious, considering which the prayer is rejected. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)