IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6297 of 2009 NITISH KUMAR, S/O SRI BAIDYANATH CHAUDHARY, R/O VILLAGE LOMA, P.S. TISIAUTA, DISTRICT- VAISHALI. -PETITIONER Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PRIME MINISTER’S SECRETARIAT, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI. 2. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF POWER, GOVT. OF INDIA, SARDAR PATEL BHAWAN, RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI. 3. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING, GOVT. OF INDIA, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI. 4. SECRETARY, CABINET COMMITTEE ON APPOINTMENTS CABINET SECRETARIAT, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI. 5. PUBLIC ENTERPRISES SELECTION BOARD, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING, GOVT. OF INDIA, PE BHAWAN, BLOCK NO.14, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 003. 6. CHIEF VIGILANCE COMMISSIONER OF INDIA, SATKARTA BHAWAN, GPO COMPLEX, BLOCK A, INA, NEW DELHI 110 023. 7. CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED, SAUDAMINI, PLOT NO.2, SECTOR 29, GURGAON, HARYANA. -RESPONDENTS 2 19.05.2009 Heard the parties. After going through the averments made in this writ petition, filed by way of public interest litigation, and considering the gist of prayer made therein, we are of the firm opinion that this writ petition cannot be entertained as a 2 public interest litigation. Therefore, it is dismissed. (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) AAhmad