IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 16TH AUGUST 2007 / 25TH SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 27485 of 2006(V) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24/03/2006 IN IA 665/05 IN AS.145/2005 of ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, PARAVUR .................... PETITIONER: ------------ RADHA MOHANDAS, AGED 49, W/O. MOHANDAS, THEJUS, KITTANMENON ROAD, NEAR KOODALMANIKOM TEMPLE, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.JOSEPH RESPONDENTS: ---------------- 1. P.K.JANARDHANAN NAIR, AGED 54, S/O. PARAMESWARAN NAIR, VRINDHAVAN HOUSE, KOTHAKULANGARA, ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA, ANGAMALY BRANCH. 3. THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, IRINJALAKUDA BRANCH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 27485 OF 2006 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of August, 2007 JUDGMENT No process is remitted so far. No representation for the petitioner. Counsel for the 3rd respondent sought time to get instructions from the Bank as to whether the Bank is interested in the matter. Going by the exhibits along with the Writ Petition I notice that the Bank is arrayed in the Writ Petition as a proforma party. The Writ Petition will stand dismissed, however, only for default. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE btt WPC 2