1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 143/2009 (VISHAL GAGARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT KORADI VS. DAMODAR RAJERAM THAKRE) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. A.R.Itankar, Advocate, for applicant. Mr.N.B.Bargat, Advocate, for respodent. CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : JANUARY 27, 2010. Heard. 2 By this application, the applicant prays condonation of delay of 21 days in order to prefer an appeal on the ground that applicant is a registered society and corporate body and require to observe certain formalities, in order to prepare bail as well as to seek approval and engagement of advocate etc. 3. Learned counsel for respondent objected condonation of delay on the ground that no sufficient cause is made out as applicant did not act diligently and therefore, should not be condoned. 4 Considering the reason stated in the application, as also submissions advanced, in the 2 interest of justice, I am inclined to allow the application and to condone the delay, subject to payment of costs of Rs.500/- payable to the respondent within two weeks. Application stands disposed of accordingly. Criminal Application for leave to Appeal Application be registered. Notice to respondent for leave to appeal. Mr. Bargat, Advocate, waives notice on behalf of respondent to contest the application for leave. Reply, if any, be filed on or before 8th February, 2010. S.O. 8th February, 2010. JUDGE Rvjalit.