IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.12124 of 1989 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.03.2011 Chuni Lal Kasturi Lal and others ....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents II. Civil Writ Petition No.12836 of 1989 (O&M) M/s Jagjit Singh and Company and others ....Petitioners versus The State of Haryana and others ....Respondents III. Civil Writ Petition No.13871 of 1989(O&M) M/s Krishan Chand Pardeep Kumar and others ....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents IV. Civil Writ Petition No.4962 of 1990 (O&M) M/s Daya Singh Dharam Singh and others ....Petitioners versus The State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Civil Writ Petition No.12124 of 1989 (O&M) - 2 - Present: Mr. D.N.Ganeriwala, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. K.C. Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent No.1. Mr. Ravi Kapur, Advocate, for the respondents 2 and 3 ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No. 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? No. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? No. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) All the four petitions relate to the alleged offence of not maintaining stock registers for vegetable, fruits etc. By the circular of the second respondent issued on 27.06.1989, there had been directions that if stock registers are not properly maintained, the licences were liable for cancellation. The cases have stood on for this long and I do not propose to go into the merits of the cases and dispose of them as having become infructuous. The respondents, however, shall be at liberty to take any action for fresh violations and if such violations give rise to any action for cancellation of licences, they shall be at liberty to do so. All the writ petitions are disposed of in the light of above. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 14.03.2011 sanjeev