IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 24397 of 2005 Between: 1 S.Bomma Saheb S/o. Kale Saheb R/o. Kadamukuntla village, Tuggfali Mandal, Kurnool District 2 S.Raza Saheb S/o. Khasim Saheb R/o. Kadamukuntla village, Tuggfali Mandal, Kurnool District 3 Shaik Vali S/o.S.Khasim Saheb R/o. Kadamukuntla village, Tuggfali Mandal, Kurnool District ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Chief Executive Ofrficer, A.P.State Wakf Board Hyderabad 2 The District Collector, Kurnool District, Kurnool 3 The President, District wakf Committee, Kurnool Kurnool District 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Tuggali Mandal Kurnool District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the impugned order dated 17.8.2005 vide Rc.No.E8/2504/2005 issued by the 2nd respondent herein directing the 4th respondent to handover the possession of the land admeasuring Ac.30-00 Gts., situated in Sy.No.156,166 and 175 of Kadamakuntla village, Tuggali Mandal, Kurnool District belonging to the Kadamakuntla Mosque and Peerlachavidi to the Managing Committee of Hussainpuram Mosque, contrary to Section 51 of the Wakf Act 1995, and ignoring the maintenance of the Mosque as well as Peerlachavidi of Kandamakuntla village, as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and violative of Article 14 and 26 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon`ble Court deems ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners :MR.J.JANAKIRAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER : (Per Hon’ble Sri Anil R.Dave, CJ) Learned advocate appearing for petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission granted. The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. _________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 14th November 2008 ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J ajr