IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18718 of 2010 JAMADAR MANDAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 25.6.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The bail application of the petitioner was twice earlier been rejected by this court. Learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to the allegation of recovery of the incriminating articles at the instance of the petitioner, submits that the seizure list does not contain his signature. He further submits that petitioner for the alleged offence has remained in custody since 4.3.2009 and thus his prayer may be reconsidered. Taking into consideration the circumstances, aforesaid let the petitioner, namely Jamadar Mandal be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Naugachia, District-Bhagalpur in connection with Gopalpur (Rangra) P.S. Case No. 82 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- - 2 - (1) That one of the close relative of the petitioner would stand as a bailor and who would file an affidavit indicating his/her relationship with the petitioner. (2) The said bailor would be under a duty to inform the Court below in case the petitioner is named or gets involved in any other criminal case after his release in this case and whereupon the Court concerned, shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner on ground of misuse. (3) The petitioner would ensure his representation before the Court below on each and every date fixed and upon failure of the petitioner to ensure his representation in the Court below on two consecutive dates, without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the Court below would entitle the Court below to initiate proceedings for cancellation of his bail bonds and for taking him into custody. Anand Kr. ( Jyoti Saran, J.)