IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 28TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 5133 of 2010(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RASHEED.I.T.K,S/O.K.V.MAHAM OOD, AGED 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT ILLATHU THAZHEKUNI, P.O.KADALOOR, KOYILANDI TALUK,KOZHIKODE-673 531. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.FIROZ SMT.M.SHAJNA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MOODADI GRAMA PANCHAYATH , MOODADI GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE, MOODADI, P.O.KADALLOOR, CALICUT-673 531., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SEVCRETARY, MOODADI GRAMA PANCHAYATH MOODADI,P.O.KADALLOOR, CALICUT-673 531. 3. ABDURAHIMANKUTTY, S/O.BAVA, AGED 70 YEARS, NACHIKATTU, KEEZHUR ROAD, NANDI TOWN, NEAR BADAL MASJID, VANMUKAM AMSOM, VEERAVANCHERI DESOM, KOYLANDI TALUK, KOZHIKODE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.5133 of 2010 (N) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 17th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T Prayer sought in the writ petition is for a direction to respondents 1 & 2 to consider Ext.P1, a petition made against the 3rd respondent. 2. If as stated, Ext.P1 has been received, it is directed that the 2nd respondent shall take necessary action thereon. 3. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the allegations raised and it is entirely for the 2nd respondent to examine the matter and only if he is satisfied, need to take action in the matter, which shall also be with notice to the 3rd respondent. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg