1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 3158 OF 2011 *** Rashtriya Ekatmata Vikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Deoni Versus The State of Maharashtra and another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 3158 OF 2011 *** Rashtriya Ekatmata Vikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Deoni Versus The State of Maharashtra and another *** Mr. Sunil V. Warad, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. V. H. Dighe, A.G.P. for the Respondent/ State Authorities. *** 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has challenged the Government Resolution dated 12th August, 2010 on the ground that it is contrary to the Government Resolution dated 4th February, 2008. Petitioners seek permission to start new senior college (Arts, Commerce and Science) at village Deoni, Taluka Deoni, district Latur relying upon Government Resolution dated 4th February, 2008. Learned counsel for the Petitioners, after taking us through the Government Resolution dated 4th February, 2008 and the Master plan issued by 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 3158 OF 2011 *** Rashtriya Ekatmata Vikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Deoni Versus The State of Maharashtra and another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University, Nanded for the year 2009-10 submitted that as per this Government Resolution they are entitled to start new senior college on grant-in-aid basis. In support of this contention, he took us through paragraph 1 (B) and 1 (C) of the Resolution to contend that Taluka Deoni does not have senior college (Arts, Commerce & Science) and hence their proposal ought to have been considered and allowed by the Government on the basis of this Government Resolution. The contentions urged by learned counsel for the Petitioner on the basis of this Government Resolution, in our opinion, are not correct. We have perused the Government Resolution very carefully. This Government Resolution provides that if the existing colleges, are not having all the three faculties (Arts, Commerce and Science), they are entitled to 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 3158 OF 2011 *** Rashtriya Ekatmata Vikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Deoni Versus The State of Maharashtra and another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. apply for the remaining faculties on grant- in-aid basis. Petitioners in our opinion do not fall in this category and admittedly their application is for starting new college. The reliance placed on Government Resolution dated 4th February, 2008 in our opinion is misplaced. In view thereof, we do not find it necessary to examine the challenge to Government Resolution dated 12th August, 2008. In the circumstances, petition is dismissed. 3. Dismissal of the writ petition shall not preclude the petitioners from applying for permission to open new senior college in the event there is a change in the Government policy. [S. B. DESHMUKH, J.] [D. B. BHOSALE, J.] Dated:28/06/2011. ans/3158