1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2805 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.2805 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.2805 OF 2004 Hemant Pandurang Kulkarni ...Petitioner Hemant Pandurang Kulkarni ...Petitioner Hemant Pandurang Kulkarni ...Petitioner Vs. Vs. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents ----- ----- ----- Mr. S.P. Thorat Adv. for Petitioner Mr. S.P. Thorat Adv. for Petitioner Mr. S.P. Thorat Adv. for Petitioner Ms. Sushma Bhende A.G.P. for the State Ms. Sushma Bhende A.G.P. for the State Ms. Sushma Bhende A.G.P. for the State CORAM: F.I.REBELLO & ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO & ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO & ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATED: 22ND NOVEMBER , 2005 DATED: 22ND NOVEMBER , 2005 DATED: 22ND NOVEMBER , 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. It is pointed out by the Petitioner that on 2. It is pointed out by the Petitioner that on 2. It is pointed out by the Petitioner that on 16th October 2004 the Pension Adalat considering the 16th October 2004 the Pension Adalat considering the 16th October 2004 the Pension Adalat considering the orders passed in Writ Petition No.5234 of 2003 and orders passed in Writ Petition No.5234 of 2003 and orders passed in Writ Petition No.5234 of 2003 and Writ Petition No.5224 of 2003 asked the Government to Writ Petition No.5224 of 2003 asked the Government to Writ Petition No.5224 of 2003 asked the Government to consider the grant of pension and other retirement consider the grant of pension and other retirement consider the grant of pension and other retirement benefits if any. Till date the Government has not benefits if any. Till date the Government has not benefits if any. Till date the Government has not considered the retirement benefits of the Petitioner. considered the retirement benefits of the Petitioner. considered the retirement benefits of the Petitioner. Therefore, the Government is directed to dispose of Therefore, the Government is directed to dispose of Therefore, the Government is directed to dispose of the Petitioner’s case for Pension within a period of 8 the Petitioner’s case for Pension within a period of 8 the Petitioner’s case for Pension within a period of 8 weeks from today. weeks from today. weeks from today. . Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as . Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as . Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. to costs. to costs. (F.I.REBELLO J.) (F.I.REBELLO J.) (F.I.REBELLO J.) 2 (ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (ROSHAN DALVI, J.)