i'S C A p C^-io^ IN THE HI£H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT P6TITION N0. SSQ& /2006 PETITIONER: -^M^ <^-;>"- ^' Vs RESPON&ENTS: B. Ramarao. son of Shri B.S. Rao, aged about 43 years, resident of C-12, Pali Project, P.0. Birsinghpur, bistrict Umariya (M.P.), presently working as Superintendent of AAines, Pali Project, Johilla Area, SECL. 1. Coal India Limited, through its Chairman /^^srrS^, "\ -sft'yl'sigf\s-iit .•1K<8}'};-€•// •••v^w.^ ^^ry^'y ••^7?jR^Tr<rrrt<J^ ••' Coal Bhawan, 1, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata (W.B.) 2. South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., through its Chairman cum Managing director, Registered office at Seepat Road, Bilaspur. 3. The Seneral Manager (Personnel), Coal India Limited, Coal Bhawan, 1, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata (W.B.) WRIT PETITION UNbER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF IN&IA. HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASTOR Writt Pfctittoa (s) No. 5506 of2006 Petilioncr B. Ramarao Versus Respoadents ; Coal India Lnnited & others Sta^te Bendi: Hoalile Mr. Justioe Strtteh K. Agdhotrf. Shri Ajit Singh, counsel for fhe petitfoiier. O R DE R (27<*10ctober, 2006) The petitioner, who was woriking as Superiatendent of Manes, Pdi Project, Johflla Area, S.E.C.L. B-5 Gtade SUK!C 2003, had fifcd flus petition chaUctigmg fhe validily and coxrectnesa of ttie ofBce memorandum dated 12.6.2006 (Annexure P/II) whetchy the recomineadatfons of the coaunittee, held oa 211It Jufy, 2005 (Annexure P/10) was made efifective front 8.5.2006. Thc coaamittee madc foBowing Becommexidatioas:- "7.1 Henceforth the benefit of piomotion on passing l" Class shouM be ya/en to fhose 2nd Ctass Managers onfy who passed l*t eiasa wfaik woridng in E-2 grade as waa prevateitt hefiate l-4- 1993 aiad provided m fhe Common Coal Cadre fiom. fhe eflfective date of pE^sing as mdicated in fte I'" Ctess Certifteate prowidcd it is subnutted within onc month fioxn the date of issuc otherwise fi»m the date of submission. Thc cafficutiwes who ps^s l*t Class MMCC ia E3, B4& E5 grade wffi be horizontatfy placed m the same graie in I^irst Clasa Channel fix>m fhe efiEectivc date of Piret Class." Tbs Genetal Manager (PersonDeQ vide aEBce taeinoiaadum dated 12.6.2006 accepted fhe recomineadations of the coaunittee to reaiove iblu anomalies and for regulatmg future career gmwth of Minmg cxecutwes. The said icconunendatfons come into fbice w.c.f 8.5.2006 in foBowiag terms;- The above recoBunenilatfon shafl be coxne into foroe wifh eflfect fiom 8.5.2006. Acconlingfy, fhc old cases shaB bc disposed as per existing norms and guidelines and ncw pasa out cases shaB be dealt as per iiecoininendation mentfoned abowe" Learaed (»unsel appearing for fhe petitioner siibmits that fbe recoimaendatioiis of fhe conunittee constituting of fhe senior officcrs bc vasde cfifectlve with cflfect fiom the date the rec»xnn»eadatk>aswcrc DBadc. 5. It is weU settled principte fhat recoiiuneadations ese always advisoiy in the nature and it caonot be directed to givc eEfect to such recomincndations wifhout fhe same beiiig accepted. It is accepted by the coinpetent authorily to grant beaefit under thc recomiaendatiDns and even fbe recoiiunendations can be refused also. fa the present case, some reconunendations of the conunittee have becn acceptcd by ffae respondent No. 1 and was inadc eflfective fiiom 8.5.20Cte vjde office giemorandum dated l'2at June, 2006 (Aitnexure P/11). Thc petitioiier is not in a position to point out aay rqEht which has accrucd in favour of the petitioner and lurthcr fhere was any bieaoh ofsuch right which has accrued in favour offhc petitioner. Thiis, fhis petitfon is devoid of inerit It desaves to be aad is dismissed summarify. Satish KAgmhotri Judge