BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Fourth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.11078 of 2011 M.RAJAMANI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED (SINGLE) Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT CR.NO.47/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.ANAND Advocate For Respondent : A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/sole Accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 465, 468, 471, 420, 419 read with Section 34 of IPC in crime No.47 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that this court, on an earlier occasion, has granted the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner vide order dated 29.07.2011 in Crl.OP.(MD).No.8910 of 2011 and due to inadvertence, while noting down the penal provisions, mistakenly section 471, 419 read with 34 of IPC have been omitted and additionally added Section 506(II) IPC and hence, he could not execute the sureties within a time and therefore, the said petition came to be dismissed automatically. 3. This court heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and I am satisfied with the reasons stated in the petition. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. 5. The petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 24/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TIRUNELVELI 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. R.ANAND Advocate SR.No.29182 GH : 29.08.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11078 of 2011 Date :24/08/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/