..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.286 OF 2007 Ms.Nishita N. Shah Mrs.Sushila N. Shah & Rajendra Rameshchandra Chaturvedi. ...Applicants. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra. ...Respondent. .... Mr.I.A.Bagaria, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 6th March, 2007. DATED : 6th March, 2007. DATED : 6th March, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. Applicant Nos.1 & 2 are original complainants and applicant No.3 is the original accused in Criminal Complaint No.39/SW/2006 which is pending before the learned Additional CMM, 40th Court, Girgaum, Mumbai. 3. The applicants-orig.complainants who are ..(2).. present before the Court have stated that there is compromise between them and the accused in this case and they do not wish to proceed with the complaint. They prayed that the complaint No.39/SW/2006 and proceedings relating be quashed. 4. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably settled the dispute amongst themselves and looking to the fact that the complainants does not wish to proceed with the complaint, in my view, this application can be allowed. In the result, Criminal Complaint No.39/SW/2006 and proceedings relating thereto are quashed. 5. Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)