IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 63 OF 2007 MRS. DEEPALI RAJENDRA MADHAVI ..APPLICANT V/S MR. RAJENDRA MANIK MADHAVI ..RESPONDENT NONE FOR THE APPLICANT. MR. MANDAR LIMAYE, ADVOCATE, FOR THE RESPONDENT. CORAM: J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 2ND JUNE, 2008. DATE : 2ND JUNE, 2008. DATE : 2ND JUNE, 2008. P.C. 1. None appeared for the Applicant in the morning and therefore the matter was kept back. But none is present in the second half also. Mr. Limaye, learned counsel for the Respondent - husband points out that husband had filed Marriage Petition for Divorce against the Applicant/Wife on 15-1-2007 before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Thane. After that wife had filed an application for maintenance under section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code before the JMFC, Panvel. She has filed this application for transfer of Marriage Petition from the court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Thane to the JMFC, Panvel on the ground that it is not convenient for her to attend the court at Thane. : 2 : Learned counsel for the Respondent points that Panvel is not more than 30 kilometres from Thane and when the court itself is located at such a distance there is no justification to transfer the same to Panvel. If the Applicant has some financial problem she may move application for appropriate direction before the trial court. 2. In view of the above circumstances I find no substance. The Application stands dismissed. (J. H. BHATIA, J) (J. H. BHATIA, J) (J. H. BHATIA, J)