IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 25264 of 2005 Between: S.S.V. Junior College, Sankarapuram, Kadpa, Rep by its Correspondent Dr. B. Dwarakanath Swaroop, S/o. Sri Gopalaswamy, aged 32 years, R/o.R.S. Nagar, Siddavattam, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Director of Intermediate Education, Govt. of A.P. Nampally, Hyderabad - 500 001. 3 Regional Joint Director of Intermediate Education, Kadap Region, Kadapa. 4 Smt. Sheela Rasalind, Junior Lecturer in English, Rajampet, Kadapa District. 5 Smt. N. Aruna Kumari, Physical Director, Kadapa Town. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of MANDAMUS declaring the Proceedings in G.O.Rt.No. 834 Higher Education (IE.II) Department dt. 15-10-2005 of the 1st Respondent as arbitrary, illegal and by setting aside the same direct implementing the directions contained in G.O.Rt.No. 864 Higher Education (IE.II) Department dt. 22-11-2001 of the 1st Respondent and further direct reimbursing the amounts spent by the petitioner Institution towards the salary of adhoc employees during the interregnum period and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: DR.P.B.VIJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondents 4&5: MR. K.VIJAYA KUMAR REDDY The Court made the following : O R D E R : When this writ petition came up for hearing on 12.06.2009, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even on this day also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:24th June, 2009. cs ..... ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. 2. 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}