IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FA No.2 of 1974 Sheoji Singh & Ors Versus Most.Lalmati Kuer & Anr ----------- 30. 19.10.2011 Perused the office note dated 17.10.2011. It appears that the respondent nos.1 and 4 have died. By order dated 18.02.2011, peremptory time was granted to the appellants to file substitution application regarding the deceased respondent nos.1 and 4. For non-compliance of the said order, the appeal has been dismissed against the legal representatives of the deceased respondent nos.1 and 4. According to the office note, the respondent no.2 also died but still today, no substitution application has been filed. The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that he is not in a position to take any steps because in spite of his repeated letters, nobody is coming to him. In view of the fact that the respondent nos.1 and 2 who were the only plaintiffs in the Court below whose suit has been decreed, both have died and no substitution application has been filed. Now, therefore, the whole appeal has become incompetent as abated against the legal representatives of the deceased respondent nos.1 and 2. Therefore, the whole appeal is dismissed as abated. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)