1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO.520/2009 with CA NO.5661/2004. Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court s’ Orders or directions and Court’s or Judge’s Order Registrar s Orders.. ’ CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 22nd JUNE, 2009 --- P.C.:- . Heard both Counsel elaborately. 2) At this stage of the matter, the order under challenge need not be dissected or criticized. The change in the statutory arrangement, cannot be obliterated. Consequently, the jurisdiction to entertain the appeal either way lies with the District Judge, it is for the District Judge to consider the admissibility and all the consequential questions therein. With this, the appellant is allowed to withdraw the appeal to take appropriate steps. Both the parties shall report before the District Judge at Ahmednagar on 10th August, 2009. 2 3) In view of withdrawal of the appeal, CA does not survive, it is disposed of. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/bdv/fa520.09