IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 26841 of 2001 Between: R.S.V. Someswara Rao S/o Satyanarayana R/o Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government. of A.P. Rep. by Secretary, Legal Affairs Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad 2 The District Collector Eluru West Godavari District. 3 V. Venkateswarlu S/o Rangacharyulu Tadepalligudem, W.G. District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the appointment of the 3rd Respondent in G.O.Rt.No.1489 dt: 22-9-2001 as wholly illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to consider the appointment of the petitioner by implementing the rules of reservation. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.SRI RAGHU RAM Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR LAW & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS Counsel for the Respondent No.2:GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: MR.A.K.JAYAPRAKASH RAO The Court made the following O R D E R: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. _____________ 23.06.2005 usd To 1 The Secretary, Legal Affairs, Government of A.P., Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad 2 The District Collector Eluru West Godavari District. 3. Two CCs to G.P. for Law and Legislative Affairs, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT). 4 Two CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT). 5 Two CD copies.