SPLA No. 38 of 2006 Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. for the appellant /State. None for the respondent inspite of service. I have gone through the judgment and the record of the trial court. The learned Addl. G.A. relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Madan Lal and another Vs. State of H.P. reported in (2003) 7 SCC p/465. The learned Addl. G.A. further contended that the learned trial court has acquitted the accused/respondent on a flimsy ground. Perused the judgment of the trial court. This is a fit case where the leave to appeal should be granted. Therefore, the leave to appeal is hereby granted. Heard on admission. Admit. There is no representation on behalf of the respondent. Issue notice to the respondent returnable at an early date. Lower court record has been received. List in due course. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dt. : 11.06.2008 Shiv