IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 25738 of 2008 Between: H. Surekha Bai W/o. H. Jayaraj Singh R/o.13-6-372, of Block-J, Ward No.26, Kulsumpura Village, Asifguda Mandal, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Lakadi-ka-pool, Hyderabad. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad. 4 The Tahsildar, Asifnagar Mandal, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in attempting to dispossess the petitioner from her house property bearing Door No.13-6-830/A/11 of Block-J, Ward No.26, situated at Kulsumpura Village, Asifnagar Mandal, Hyderabad without issuing any notice or following the due process of law is illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and against the principles of natural justice and also against the constitutional rights guaranteed under Article 300-A of the Consitutional of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from her house property bearing Door No.13-6- 830/A/11 of Block-J, Ward No.26, situated at Kulsumpura Village, Asifnagar Mandal, Hyderabad without followign due process of law and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.S.SURYA PRAKASH RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.25738 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner is statedly owner of house bearing door No. 13-6-830/A/11, Block J, Ward No.26, Kulsumpura Village, Asifnagar Mandal, Hyderabad. She claims to have purchased the same under an agreement of sale dated 29.01.1993 from Dharam Singh and living there. When there was inference by one Balaprasad and another, she filed O.S.No.5305 of 1998 on the file of the Court of X Additional Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, and obtained status quo in I.A.No.863 of 1998. It is now alleged that on 22.11.2008 fourth respondent, namely, Tahsildar, Asifnagar Mandal, accompanied by Revenue Inspector and staff have come to her property and tried to dispossess her. Therefore, instant writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner without due process of law. At the stage of admission itself learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Telangana Area) obtained instructions on behalf of fourth respondent. He submits that fourth respondent is not at all interfering with possession of the petitioner and that the writ petition is filed making incorrect statements. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of observing that unless and until due process of law is followed, petitioner’s right to enjoy the property cannot be curtailed. No costs. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 25th November, 2008 GHN To 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Lakadi-ka-pool, Hyderabad. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad. 4 The Tahsildar, Asifnagar Mandal, Hyderabad. 5 2CCs to GP for Revenue 6 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MSN}