HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO W.P.No.30968 of 2011 Dated: 23-11-2011 Between: Dr.V.Rajagopal and another …Petitioners AND Mohan Rao Raulapati Respondent. This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO W.P.No.30968 of 2011 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy) By means of ﬁling this writ petition, petitioners invoked the certiorari jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India to quash the orders of Special Court under A.P.Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act made in I.A.No.401 of 2011 in L.G.C.No.65 of 2005 dated 3.11.2011. By the impugned orders, the Special Court allowed I.A.No.401 of 2011 ﬁled by respondent herein to condone the delay of 565 days in ﬁling the petition for setting aside the default order dated 31.9.2009 dismissing the L.G.C. on condition of payment of costs of Rs.3,000/- to the petitioners herein and Rs.3,000/- to the Bar Association. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material available on record. Then Apex Court in Syed Yakoob v. Radhakrishnan (AIR 1964 SC 477) laid down the parameters for invocation of certiorari jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India. In the case on hand, by the impugned order, the Land Grabbing Court exercised the jurisdiction for condoning the delay in ﬁling the petition for setting aside the default order dated 31.9.2009 dismissing the L.G.C., which is purely a discretionary order. There is no error apparent on the face of the record and in the absence of any perversity pointed out with the impugned order, this Court cannot quash the said order. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________________ (A. GOPAL REDDY, J.) _______________ (R. KANTHA RAO, J.) NOVEMBER 23, 2011 T SR