IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.11285 of 2004 Between: Kandula Narayana Reddy S/o Narayana Reddy Markapuram, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of AP., Rep.by its Secretrary, Home Department , Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Inspector General of Police, Govt. of AP. Hyderabad 3 The Superintendent of Police, Ongole Prakasam District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents in not providing the security to the petitioner as illegal,arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondendts herein to forthwith provide two gunmen for the Security of Petitioner herein pursuant to the representation submitted to the 2nd respondent, Counsel for the Petitioner: K.ARUNA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: Form-NIC-OGS/WP{GR} THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.11285 of 2004 ORDER: Heard on either side. The petitioner seeks to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to provide two gunmen for his security, pursuant to the representation submitted by him before the 2nd respondent-the Inspector General of Police. This Court, while admitting the writ petition on 06.07.2004, directed the 3rd respondent-the Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 23.05.2004. Therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. However a counter has been filed on behalf of respondents, stating that there is no treat to the petitioner from the Peoples War Group, but however, as and when there is any threat to the petitioner, the police will not hesitate to provide PSO’s to the petitioner. In view of the counter allegations and in view of the interim order dated 06.07.2004, no orders need be passed in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, in terms of the interim order dated 06.07.2004, passed in WPMP.No.14361/2004. No order as to costs. _____________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 17.04.2008 Dsr .... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 Government of AP., Rep.by its Secretrary, Home Department , Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Inspector General of Police, Govt. of AP. Hyderabad 3 The Superintendent of Police, Ongole Prakasam District 4 2. 2CCs to 5. 2CD copies