1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 48. CA/12712/2008 In RC/3191/2003 WITH CA/12713/2008 In RC/3194/2003 WITH CA/12714/2008 In RC/3192/2003 WITH CA/12715/2008 In RC/3180/2003 WITH CA/12716/2008 In RC/3197/2003 Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court s’ Orders or directions and Court’s or Judge’s Order Registrar s Orders.. ’ CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 30th JUNE, 2009 --- P.C.:- 1) Heard Mrs. RR Mane, learned AGP for State. 2 2) There is delay of 913 days in causing to file appeals seeking to challenge the Judgment and Order in LAR No. 10/1995 dated 11th December, 2000. 3) Though I find that the stakes of the State having involved in the matters, the rights should not be foreclosed. However, the delay is not sufficiently and properly explained. It may be that the concerned official was sitting tight on the file to take decision in time, however, the same will not be excuse to be condoned. Consequently, the applications for condonation of delay are dismissed. Resultantly, the appeals dismissed. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/bdv/ca12712.08