IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5927 of 2010 JITENDRA YADAV, SON OF DEOKI YADAV & DEOKI PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 10/03/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 307, 324 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. On the earlier occasion, the petitioner was directed to be released on bail on condition that the Magistrate would verify that the petitioner was an accused in only two other case of similar nature but on verification it was found that in fact the petitioner was an accused in four other cases of similar nature and, therefore, he was not released on bail. A report was called for from the court concerned and it appears that till date not a single witness has been examined out of the thirteen charge sheeted witnesses. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J., F.T.C. –I, Nawadah, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 10 of 2010/5 of 2010 arising out of Nawadah (Bundelkhand) P.S. Case No. 68 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on - 2 - affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)