( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7061 OF 2010 Sau Arun w/o Appasaheb Ghavate PETITIONER VERSUS The State Election Commission, Mumbai through Commissioner and others. RESPONDENTS .... Mr. R.P. Bhumkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.T. Shelke, advocate for the respondent No. 1. Mr. S.V. Kurundkar, Additional Govt. Pleader for the respondents No. 2 and 3. Mr. S.S. Jadhavar, advocate for the respondent No. 4. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 6th August, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard counsel. 2. The petitioner has filed petition against order of acceptance of nomination paper filed by the respondent No. 4 on allegation that she is ineligible. It is alleged that the respondent No. 4 was having more than two (2) children as on the date of filing of the nomination paper and that two (2) of such children were born after the cut-off date i.e. 12th ( 2 ) September, 2001. It is explicit that such objection was not immediately taken when the nomination form was filed by respondent No. 4 – Sow. Vaijayanta. The objection was raised on 30th July, 2010 after the scrutiny was over. In this view of the matter, when the election process is at the fag end and the voting is scheduled on 8th August, 2010 i.e. day-after- tomorrow, the petition cannot be entertained so as to stall the process of election at the instance of the petitioner. The petitioner is at liberty to agitate all the disputed questions raised by her in appropriate proceedings. The petition is dismissed. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/wp7061-10