WWLE EimGH ® IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. w. P. (C) No. 69 3&5 of 201 1 / PETITIONER : Kulwant Singh S/o Shri Charan Singh, through the Power of Attorney Holder Manharan Lal Verma S/o Shri Shyamlal Verma, aged about 46 years, R/o Kadambari Nagar, Durg, Tahsil 85 District-Durg (C.G.) VERSUS :17/ State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Excise Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Rajpur (C.G.) 2. /The Secretary, Department of Home, D,K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. [Superintendent of Police, Raipur, District—Raipur (C.G.) 4.” The Collector, Raipur, District— Raipur (C.G.) 5. /District Excise Offlcer, Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) 6. r’ Police Station Dharsiwan, through the Station House Officer, District—Raipur (C.G.) 7.” Vinod Tiwari, S/o not known to the petitioner, aged about 34 years, R/o Mova, Raipur (C.G.) 8f Rupesh Baghel, S/o not known to the petitioner, aged about 27 years, R/o Village—Pathri, Tahsil- Dharsiwan, District-Raipur (C.G.) 9. w Pappu Banjare, S/o not known to the petitioner, aged about 28 years, R/o -Dharsiwan, District— Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS @ 10. Ishwar Baghel, aged about 48 R/o Pathri, Tahsil-Dharsiwan, District-Raipur (C.G.) 11. Mahesh Dewangan, aged about 52 years, R/o Lakholi, Tahsil— Mandirhasod, District-Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.5929 OF 2011 (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Prateek Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. O R D E R (Passed on this 20'" day of October. 201 1) Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioner for running the duly allotted liquor shop to the petitioner situated at Siiiyari, District Raipur, without any hurdle. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that some anti social elements are creating problem and not allowing the petitionerto operate the liquor shop, which is duly allotted to him and creating hurdle for which the petitioner is entitled to proper police protection: 'Learhed counsel further submits that the petitioner, being aggrieved made a representation/complaint to th'e Collector, Raipur, on 129—2011 and a copy of the same was endorsed to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Raipur and the Deputy Commissioner (Excise), Raipur, but till date no action has been taken. Though the application was made recently, however, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, if the immediate action is not taken, the petitioner, who has been legally allotted the shop, would suffer irreparable loss. PETITIONER Kulwant Singh RESPONDENTS Versus Gowri At this juncture, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that if the representation/complaint, as aforestated, is pending consideration before the respondent authorities, the same shall be looked into and proper action shall be taken strictly in accordance with law and on its own merits, as early as possible preferably within a period of two weeks. In View of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty t9 make a fresh application to the concerned officers, if so advised. Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNH-IORI Judge