Smgm §amh fL‘ ,Wn/ @ , (7' IN THE HON'BLE HIQH coum‘ OF CHHAmseARI—a AT sxLAswR (ca) ' w.P. (s) No. M136 /2o11 PETITIONER : Ghanamm Vaishnav, Aged abou‘r 60_ years, S/o Shri Tufyadas Vaishnav, Ledur‘er, Governmem High School Mangla, Bilaspur‘ Block Bilha, DisMc’r-Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RE$P0NDENT5 z /1. sme of Chhamsgarh Through Secrefary, \‘1 School Educo‘i’ion Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Direcfor Public Instruc‘rions Raipur (C.&.) 3. District Education Officer, Biiaspur, Disfricfr-Biiaspur (C.G.) Block Educo‘rion Officer Bilha, Disfr‘icf— Bilaspur‘ (C.G.) 5. Join? Direc’ror, Treasury, Accounf Pension, Bilaspur (C.G,) ‘6. The Principle, Governmen‘r High i School Mangla, Block Bilha, Disl‘r. Bilaspur‘ (C.G.) g/ WRIT PETITION UND§§ ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA l @ EEK-$51 {iii}??? mg $HHATT§$$§¢§§§ rii‘ $§L§§3PE£R §§w§am Mr. Jugizéw ,Pz‘étérgmi Qéwégw} W.R(E£E Na“ £4€ES DE El)?! $r€£§§i Sh i <8 D WJ am 3 0r+?‘a“et. ner. ShnY.‘ lhwhur Dv A C: mrihe btate. $R 9%? gm ”ma . ii \IV‘ith {he cansehi af the parties, fhe matter is heard finauy. 2. {Briavance m‘ ihe pamioner‘ in fhe Qresent wftéci‘v i<= ifw th$ petxficmer was apnemhad ab Asw$t§ni "l Pachm’ on Wen pay guaia OT RsmQ- ‘AD rnr a penad cu Ewe yeatss and after compietmn of probatwn, m2? wa$ Qrantej reguiar pay gcale Q? R5. 1 $Q~3QD. 3 Cantentmn 9f £eami§d sounse! for the . Q'tifioner ha H f i$ $n‘i‘i’da‘rj fer rg§u!ar pa s fe With 9fiecf frnm tha Gate ryf WW! awmntmem aw has gas, m muarely gavarad with numi’ger (3f dem’siang nasSad by ihis Court and misc fhe iud'ment renriemd m W3 M ¥3 Sta.” Mmm2$trafwe Inbuna; Jqbalpur m {E ‘a Hg) ”WWQ‘é ffmamhsgékni Yam! am£ ‘yg @iheig ‘§§ Eta: 9f MP. am améwg, wherem it was held that the aimilarfy $3tuatsd teachers are antitlad far reguiar pay scale with erfesé fmm ihe gate 9f initial agapomtment, 4. tt is; not disputed by bath the parties; that thee matter wa$ taken up by the $tate to‘the Apex Ceurt but the appeat wa$ at$a cti$missed by the Apex Ccurt uphaiding the decteten 0t the Thhunat t0 the eftee‘t that the Teachere/Aeetetent T‘eechere are 3&i§§;§anmi Ghanaram Vaishnav yERSUfS F§gvmggw§am 3mm 0f @ ant§‘§!ed fer reguzar gay scaie frem tha daie 9f iheir initial agpaintmant. 5. En View 9f the abeve submi$sion made by ieam9d wunsei fmr ihe gariies‘ the patiticn is di3pased Qf in the same termg Le. the geiitioner is gamed liberty ta make a {egregentation if $9 anivised, in thg !ight of the afare$aid judgment and the circuiar dated D5.Q1.2€)11 (Annexure P-Q) and m tum, the Gamamed rwpomdant §$ directad t9 cansaider thtair cage (m it$ awn meriig and m its perspective. if the petitioner stands; Qn the game fasting as gaer avatar pagsed by the $tata Arimim$trattve Tt’it‘sutta! in Ititatjhukant Yacée ($Lzgata}’angi $uhsectuentty contttmm by the Supraeme Court its 3geciai Leava Patitian (Givi!) N0.6E392/$3 by eater dated Q3.Q1.95, the Qaiitiener may be ehtitiea t0 game miief acmrdingiyv 64 it i3 expectad from the $tate autharitie$ t9 pasg guitEiaig Graet after due 3orutiny cf tha fanta. 17. it is made ciear that this Ceuit hag; not expraSged any epim’on art thé merits of the case and tha authority concemgd wouid be at iiharty ta decide the repreeehtatien etrictiy in accordanee with law. Sd/- Pritinker Qiwakar Judge