1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5597 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1675 OF 2009 Shivlal Babulal Basaiji and others .. Applicants Versus 1. The C. I. D. Corporation Ltd. and others .. Respondents Shri K. D. Bade Patil, Advocate for the Applicants. Shri A. S. Bajaj, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri R. P. Phatake, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 2. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, AND A. V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE : 23RD APRIL, 2010. ORAL ORDER [Per NARESH H. PATIL, J. ] : . Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that this is a 2 group of eight matters. In other connected seven appeals, this Court [Coram : Justice B. R. Gavai and Justice N. D. Deshpande, JJ.] by an order dated 08th October, 2009, permitted respective claimants to withdraw 75% of amount out of it 50% amount without surety and 25% amount on furnishing bank guarantee. The applicants are claiming identical relief. 3. Counsel appearing for CIDCO does not dispute that in connected appeals, the claimants are allowed to withdraw the amount in accordance with law. We therefore, pass following order. O R D E R The fifty per cent of the amount awarded by the Reference Court shall be permitted to be withdrawn by the applicants without furnishing any surety. However, the applicants shall file an undertaking before this Court that in the event if it is found that, the amount withdrawn by them is more than the one to which they are entitled, they shall refund the same. In the undertaking the detailed address of the claimants/applicants shall also be given. 3 The twenty five per cent of the amount awarded by the Reference Court shall be permitted to be withdrawn by the applicants on furnishing bank guarantee of any Nationalized or Scheduled Bank. Remaining amount shall be deposited in Fixed Deposit Receipt Scheme in any Nationalized bank. The civil application is disposed of. [ A. V. POTDAR, J. ] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] bsb/April 10