IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-2623 of 2009 Date of decision : 26.03.2009 Ramesh @ Mahesha ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ....Respondent. BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG Haryana. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Pursuant to order dated 02.03.2009 passed by this Court an affidavit of Superintendent of Police, Jind has been filed. The same has been referred to by the learned State counsel. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the investigation conducted by the police it was found that petitioner was not present at the spot. However, in the statement made by the complainant namely Ramphal before the trial court, the petitioner has been summoned to face trial under section 319 Cr.P.C. Counsel submits that petitioner is ready to face the trial and is no longer required for custodial interrogation by the police. This fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the State. Under these circumstances, the petition is allowed and it is directed that in case petitioner appears before the trial court on or before the next date of hearing, he shall be admitted to bail to the satisfaction of said Court. 26.03.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE