IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 25716 of 2007 Between: 1 M.Ameer Ali Baig S/o.M.Hyder Baig Nandyal Municipality, Kurnool District. 2 B.V.Rama Subbaiah S/o.B.Venkat Subbaiah Nandyal Municipality, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of A.P. rep. by its Secretary, MA and UD Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration, AC Guards, Hyderabad. 3 The Regional Director-cum-Appellate Commissioner, of Municipal Administration, Anantapur District. 4 The Commissioner, Nandyal Municipality, Nandyal, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the Proceedings Roc. No.3658/2002-A1-1, dt. 8.11.2002 and Proceedings Roc. 3658/2002-A1- 2 , dt. 8.11.2002 issued by the 3rd respondent and the consequential orders issued vide Proc. Roc. 4344/2002/C1, dt. 14.11.2002 issued by the 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and un-constitutional as null and void by judicially reviewing the Judgment of the AP Administrative Tribunal passed in O.A.No.10496/2002 and OA.10504/02, dt. 7.11.2007 and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.25716 of 2007 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) The learned counsel for petitioners state that in view of the proceedings of the third respondent in Roc.No.3658/2002/A3 dated 6.5.2008 admitting the petitioners into duty, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and it has become infructuous. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. ____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 16.6.2008 DA THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.25716 of 2007 (Order of the Bench delivered by Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) 16.6.2008