ABA-496-11==.sxw 1 Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.496 OF 2011 Sunil Dada @ Pandurang Khade & Ors. ... Applicants V/s. The State of Maharashtra, Thru' Karmala Police Station ... Respondent Mr. Rahul S. Kate for the Applicants. Mrs. R.V. Newton, APP, for the Respondent. CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 20 TH JUNE, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. The incident has taken place during the fight between two groups. It is contended by Mr. Kate, the learned Advocate for the Applicants, that the present Applicants had been acting in self defence. Though it cannot be said at this stage as to whether this contention has substance, the fact remains that the injuries sustained by the members of the other group do not appear to be of a very serious nature. A person from the Applicants' group has died in the incident. 3. As a matter of fact, whether any injury was sustained by any member of the other group, which could be termed as 'grievous hurt', is doubtful in as much as no such medical papers have been shown to me. ABA-496-11==.sxw 2 Dixit 4. Since, in my opinion, investigation can be properly carried out without requiring the Applicants to be detained in the custody, after considering all the relevant aspects of the matter, I think it fit to grant anticipatory bail to the Applicants. 5. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. 6. In the event of their arrest in C.R. No.64 of 2011 of Karmala Police Station, the Applicants be released on bail in the sum of Rs.30,000/- each, with one surety in like amount, or two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/-, on the condition to attend the Police Station everyday, between 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., for a period of four days from tomorrow and, thereafter, as and when required by the Investigating Officer, and make themselves available for investigation/interrogation. [A.M. THIPSAY, J.]