IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2788 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO...... OF 2006 Ramachandra B.Mirajkar )..Applicant Versus Dattatray Y.Bhoite & Anr. )..Respondents ---- Mr.Santosh B.Narwade i/by M/s.M.P.Vashi & Associates for the applicant. Mr.A.S.Shitole APP for the State. Ms.Manisha Shekhar i/by M/s.J.Shekhar & Co. for respondent no.1. ---- Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 8.7.2008. PC 1. Heard. There are arguable points involved in the appeal. The defence of the accused was that he had given the cheques by way of loan. Though the cheques have been deposited after 5 months, the Advocate for the accused is unable to convince me that the accused had sufficient balance as on 23.1.2004. In the circumstances, leave granted. Office to number the appeal. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO........ OF 2006 . Leave has been granted by a separate order. Hence, appeal admitted. Advocate for the respondents in the application waives notice. (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J)