1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 1273 OF 1989 1A. Sheriar Nariman Irani & ors. Petitioners vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India Respondents Mr.D.J.Khambatta with Mr.K.D.Mehta i/b. M/s.Payne & Cop. for the petitioners. Ms.Snehal M. Paranjape i/b.M/s.Little & Co. for the respondents. CORAM : R. M. LODHA & J.P. DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED : 23rd June 2005 P.C. On 16th June 2005 when the chamber summons no.160/2003 came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioners confined the prayer in the chamber summons to the amendment in the title of the petition as set out in paragraph 1 of Exhibit A annexed to the chamber summons. In the light of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, we permitted the petitioners to amend title of the petition by deleting the names of petitioner nos.1,2, 3 and 4 and substituting them by the persons as set out in para 1 of Exh. A annexed with the chamber summons. 2. Today when the matter came up before us, Mr.Khambatta, the learned counsel for the petitioners 2 stated that though in terms of the order passed by us on 16th June 2005, the title has been amended but there was some error in Exhibit A annexed with the chamber summons and that needs to be corrected. He also submits that for better appreciation of the cause title, one paragraph needs to be added in the writ petition. He handed in proposed further amendment, marked "X" for identification purposes. 3. The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection if the proposed further amendments in the writ petition are permitted. 4. Leave is granted to the petitioners to amend the writ petition in terms of proposed further amendments (marked "X") handed in. 5. Necessary amendments be carried out within two weeks from today. . Post the writ petition for hearing thereafter. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) (J.P. (J.P. (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) DEVADHAR,J.) DEVADHAR,J.)