IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2010 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 17322 of 2007(K) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- PANACHICKAL MUHAMMEDALI, S/O ALAVI KUTTY, PANACHICKAL HOUSE, THURAKKAL, MANJERI. BY ADV. SRI.SOJAN JAMES RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, FINANCE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE EXCUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD ROADS (DRTC SUBJECT COMMITTEE), MANJERI. 4. THE SECRETARY, MANJERI MUNICIPALITY, MANJERI. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.P.PRADEEP R4 BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.17322/2007 K APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF SANCTION ORDER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD. 13/07/2006. P2: COPY OF THE SANCTION ORDER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD.12/10/06. P3: COPY OF CLARIFICATION ISSUED ON BEHALF OF THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DTD. 31/05/06. P4: COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD. 21/03/07. P5: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 27/04/07 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT. P6: COPY OF COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.17322 of 2007-K = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 25th day of March, 2010. Judgment The petitioner carried out a work as a convener of a beneficiary committee. It is stated that amounts due to be paid on account of that would be subjected to VAT deducted at source in terms of Ext.P4. The petitioner seeks interference with that. All that is required is for the petitioner to make appropriate representation before the competent authority in the Government which will consider the request of the petitioner sympathetically. Let that be done at the earliest. All other issues on merits are left open. The writ petition ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/2503