IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 10280 of 2008 Between: Perla Suneela Kumar S/o late Satyanarayana M/s. Sai Stores, r/o D. No. 5/392(Ground Floor), Stoneshousepet, Nellore, Nellore District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Principal Secretary, Co-operation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Nellore District cooperative Marketing Society Limited, Nellore rep By its Business Manager, Having Office at Santhi Nagar, Nellore. 3 The District Cooperative Officer, Nellore District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the at the delay and inaction on the part of the 1st respondent in disposing of Revision Petition filed by the petitioner U/s. 131 of AP Cooperative Societies Act under proceedings no. 14031-Coop.1(2)/2004-I as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the Revision petition under proceedings No.14031-Coop. 1 (2)/2004-I filed by the petitioner forthwith in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner is the tenant of the Nellore District Cooperative Marketing Society Limited, the second respondent herein, in respect of the premises bearing H.No.5/392, Eastern Side, Ground Floor, Stonehousepet, Nellore. The second respondent became sick society and unable to pay the arrears of salary and gratuity etc., to its ex- employees. Hence it issued tenders on 16.06.1998 for sale of shop in question and the other shop, by way of public auction-cum-tender basis. In that context, the second respondent filed a suit for eviction of the petitioner. The said suit was decreed in favour of the second respondent. As the petitioner did not vacate the premises, the second respondent initiated execution proceedings and the said E.P. is pending before the competent civil Court. During the pendency of the said E.P., it appears, the petitioner filed a revision petition before the first respondent expressing his willingness to purchase the shop. Since the first respondent did not pass any orders, the petitioner approached this Court by way of filing the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Cooperation. Having regard to the fact that the revision petition filed by the petitioner expressing his willingness to purchase the shop in question is not yet decided, the first respondent is hereby directed to consider the said revision petition and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. __________________________ (Gopala Krishna Tamada, J.) 2nd May, 2008 Js. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Principal Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Co-operation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Business Manager, Nellore District cooperative Marketing Society Limited, Nellore, Having Office at Santhi Nagar, Nellore. 3 The District Cooperative Officer, Nellore District. 4 2 CCs to G.P. for Cooperation, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.(OUT) 5 2 CD copies.