1 CA 10987.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10987 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3716 OF 2008 [Deepak S/o Totaram Suryawanshi VERSUS The President, Sant Jagnade Maharaj Shikshan Sanstha, Dondaicha] Mr. S.R. Barlinge, Advocate for the applicant Mr. S.P. Brahme, Advocate for the respondent no.1 Mr. Vivek Dhage, Advcoate for the respondent no.2 Mr. R.J. Godbole, Advocate for the respondent no.4 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders P.C.:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Mr. Barlinge submits the fact that the cost was not deposited by the petitioner, is not placed on record by the petitioner and due to such suppression of fact the interim stay is required to be effected. The contention does not appeal to me. The petitioner is not required to make a specific statement that cost was not deposited, inasmuch as there is no stay granted to the extent of cost awarded to the employee i.e. respondent. 2 CA 10987.2010 3. Notwithstanding the fact that it is executable order, Mr. Brahme makes a statement that the amount of cost will be deposited in this Court within a period of three weeks. In view of such statement, there appears no justification for vacating the interim relief granted. The amount of cost shall be deposited within three weeks. If such amount is deposited, the applicant will be permitted to withdraw the same without any further orders. Civil Application disposed of. Sd/- DT. : 12.08.2010 [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp