IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2707 of 2009 1.BINOD MAHTO @ BINOD KUMAR, son of RemeshwarMahto, resident of village-Kurma Tola, Kewalbigha, P.S. Nawada(town), District-Nawada. 2. BISHUNDEO MAHTO, son of late Basho Mahto, resident of village-Mahramadih, P.S.Roh, District-Nawada. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 19.05.2009 Mr. Birendra Kumar, advocate appeared on behalf of the informant. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Roh P.S. Case No. 62 of 2006 under Sections 323, 498A, 380 and 376/511 of the Indian Penal Code. The complainant alleges that the petitioner and other accused who are the agnates are torturing and harassing her and that they snatched her ornaments. The husband of the complainant is said to be traceless since last ten years but any reason is not stated in the complaint petition. In the complaint petition, it has also been stated that the petitioner Bishundeo Mahto and his son Chandra Bhan Prasad are keeping bad eyes on her daughter in order to outrage her modesty but any specific instance of such act has not been stated. The leaned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in fact there is dispute of partition between the parties and that due to that reason complaints are being filed. It has also submitted that a compromise petition was filed in the - 2 - case. Further submission is that Bishundeo Mahto is cousin father-in-law and another petitioner Binod Mahto is complainant’s Nandosi and they are living separate. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, namely, Binod Mahto @ Binod Kumar and Bishundeo Mahto are admitted to anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within two weeks on furnishing their bail bonds of Rs. 10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 62 of 2006, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (C.M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-