^^ i6^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTtSGARH. BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS W.P.(S)No. 8909 of 2007 Satya Narayan Yadav, S/o Shri Sahedev Yadav, aged about 35 years, FVo Viltage and Post Nar/adapur, Police Station Kamleshpur, Tahsit Sitapur, District Surguja (C.G.) Versus 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Mainpat, Distrtot Surgjuja (C.G.) 3 Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Narvadapur, Tahsil Sitapur, DistrU Surguja (C.G.) 4 Assistant Director, Inspector of Schools, Mainpat, District Surguja (C.G.) 5 Collector, District Surguja (C.G.) 6 Director, Rajiv Gandhi Prathinik Shiksha Mission, Mainpat, District Sarguja (C.G.) 7 Chief Executive OfRcer, Zila Panchayat, District Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTn'UTION OF INDIA Appearance: Smt. Hamida Siddique, Counselfor the petitioner. Shri Pradeep Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (20.11.2007) SUMILKUMAR 8INHA, J. Heard. . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by order dated 08.04.1997, the petitioner was selected as Shiksha Karmi (Bal Shikshak) under Shiksha Guarantee Yojna for Shiksha Kendra, F^itrol Tikra. She submits that even after selection and communicatton made to the petitioner, the petitioner was not given appointment tetter. She also submits that one post is still vacant in the concerned instituUon, but whenever the petitioner makes contact with the authorities of the jState, they do not give any satisfactory reply to him. \.^ W.P.fS).No.69Q9 of2007 ^^ For the present, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a limited prayer that this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation before the concemed authority and the concemed authority may be directed to dtspose of the representation in accordance with law. This timited prayer made by learned counsel for fte peUUoner is not opposed by learned counsel for the State. The prayer is allowed. It is directed that if so advised, the petitioner may file a detailed representaUon before the concemed authority within a period of 3 weeks from today along with a copy of this order and a copy of Uie writ petition and if such a representation is filed, the concemed authority shall dispose ofthe same at the eartiest by passing a reasoned order. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the petition stands disposed of. — Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Shyna