:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1061 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1061 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1061 OF 2009 Veekay Distilleries Private Ltd & Anr....Petitioners. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.V.R.Dhond Sr.Adv. a/w Mr.Prakash Panjabi and Mr.Rohan Kelkar i/by Prakash Panjabi & Co. , advs. for the Petitioners. Mr.S.U.Kamdar, Sr.Adv. i/by Ms.Veena Thadani , advs. for the Respondents No.3. Mr.J.S.Saluja, AGP for the State, Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA ,J. J.H.BHATIA ,J. J.H.BHATIA ,J. (VACATION JUDGE) (VACATION JUDGE) (VACATION JUDGE) DATE: 25TH MAY, 2009. DATE: 25TH MAY, 2009. DATE: 25TH MAY, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Parties. 2. The Commissioner of State Excise Duty has passed the impugned order on 20th May, 2009 and according to the learned counsel even without service of the order, the Commissioner has sealed the premises to implement that order. That order is challenged in the present petition. However, it appears that the order is appellable under Section 137 of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. After some discussion at the bar, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to prefer an appeal against :2: the impugned order but with the request that the impugned order may not be implemented for a period of one week from this date. 3. Writ Petition stands disposed off as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal with further direction that the impugned order dated 20th May, 2009 shall remain stayed for a period of one week from this date and the appellant shall be at liberty to move the appellate authority for appropriate interim orders. 4. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (J.H.BHATIA, J.) (J.H.BHATIA, J.) (J.H.BHATIA, J.)