IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12486 of 2010 1. SUNIL KUMAR S/O LATE BRAHMDEO YADAV R/O VILL. AND POST- JAT DUMRI, P.S. - PUNPUN, DISTT. – PATNA .....Petitioner Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF POST THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF POST, NEW DELHI 2. THE CHIEF POST MASTER GENERAL BIHAR CIRCLE, PATNA 3. ASSISTANT POST MASTER GENERAL (VIG.) OFFICE OF CHIEF P.M.G. BIHAR CIRCLE, PATNA 4. SR. SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICE, PATNA DIVISION, PATNA 5. A.D.P.S. (STAFF & RECTT.) O/O THE CHIEF P.M.G., BIHAR CIRCLE, PATNA .......Respondents ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, advocate For the Union of India: Mr. Gopesh Kumar, C.G.C. -------- 3 15-09-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Union of India. From the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna dated 22-4-2010 passed in O.A. no. 618/2009 it appears that after the death of petitioner’s father in harness on 19-11-2001, initial appointment order was issued in favour of the petitioner in 2003 but within two months that appointment was cancelled because it was detected that approval of the directorate was fake and that led to the order of appointment. Thereafter the application for compassionate appointment was considered on merits and turned down on the ground that first son of the deceased is employed in Army and the widow had 2 received Rs. 2,48,472/- towards terminal benefits and was also in receipt of family pension of Rs. 2,750/- + dearness relief per month. In the facts of the case, we find no good reason to interfere with the order of the Tribunal rejecting the O.A preferred by the petitioner. This writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)