1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2119 of 2010 Jitendra Bhausingh Tomar and ors. ..vs.. State of Mah. and ors. =-=-==-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.N.Phadnis, Adv. for the petitioners. Ms Tajwar Khan, AGP for resp.no.1. Mr.J.B.Kasat, Adv. for resp.no.2 and 3. C ORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH AND R.K.DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : 16th September, 2010. It is clear from the record that the petitioners were appointed as Havaldar and they have been given pay scale of that post. Other persons though appointed on compassionate ground were appointed in different posts and have been given pay scale of that post. Merely because all these posts are in Class-III, it cannot be claimed by the petitioners that every post should have the same pay scale. The scale of pay is determined on the basis of the qualification and nature of work. There is no substance in the petition. It is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE. pzc 2