IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No.363 of 2011 Date of Decision: September 30, 2011 Gram Panchayat Shillihar ..Petitioner Versus Goverdhan Dass .. Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil God, Advocate vice counsel Mr. S.K. Khanna and Avinash Jaryal, Advocates. For the Respondent : Nemo. __________________________________________ Surjit Singh, Judge (oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. Petitioner has challenged the order dated 21.7.2011 of Civil Judge, Kullu, whereby written statement filed by defendant was accepted and the matter was adjourned for filing replication by the petitioner-plaintiff. Petitioner’s case is that written statement was required to be filed within 90 days from the date of service of notice and it having not been filed within that period, the same could not have been accepted, especially when there was no order, permitting the respondent-defendant to file written statement on that date, i.e. 21.7.2011. Whet her report ers of t he l ocal papers may be al l owed t o see t he j udgment ? É2É 3. Petitioner himself has placed on record certified copy of order dated 9.6.2011 of learned Civil Judge, Kullu, by which respondent was allowed, on his prayer, time upto 21.7.2011, to file written statement. So, the present petition is without merit and it is dismissed. September 30, 2011 (ss) (Surjit Singh), J.