§ ‘ § ® @ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT aILAsPUR (c.6.) PETITIONER WRIT PE’TITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA w.P.(s)No. ”3% /2o11 WWM5H5 /I[ KiriTram Sonwani, Aged abou’r 52 year's, S/o Shri 5ukhir'am, Head Masfer‘, Governmem' Primary School Navagaon Block Malkharod, Disf‘r. Jcnjgir—Champa (6.6.) x VERSUS 1. STaTe of Chhah‘isgarh Through Secre’rory, School Educofion Deparfmenf D.K.S. Bhawcm, Raipur (C.G.) ,, Z. Distric? Educofion Officer Disfr‘ic‘r Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) 3. Join’r Direc‘ior', Treasury, Accoum‘ & Pension Biiaspur Division, Biiospur (C.6.) 4. Block Educa‘rion Officer, Block Malkharod, Disf‘r. Janjgir—Champo (C.G.) Wiw HIGH COURT OF CHHATTlSGARl-I AT BELASPUR SB : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA wings) N0. 45451201 1 PETITIONER Kmtram Sonwani RESPONDENTS State of C.G. 85 Others WRIT PETIIION UNDER ARTICLE 226l22’7 OF THE CONSTITUTXON OF INDIA Appearance: Shri K.K.Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, P.L. for the State] respondents. ORAL ORDER (1 1.08.201 1) The petitioner was initially apyointed as Teacher on a iixed pay of Rs. 100. After completion of probah'on period, he was granted regular pay scale of Rs. 169—300. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the issued involved in the case is as to Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale with edect from the date of initial appoinhnent or after completion of probation period. The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative -’I‘ribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. NO. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 Others v. State of MP. 8:. Others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale with en‘ect hem the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh 8a Others, W.P.(S) No. 4725/2006, by order ven'jication of the facts. In view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No ordcr as § Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge to costs.