IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1379 of 2011 MD. RASHID Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.1945 of 2011 BINDESHWARI PRASAD MANDAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.2365 of 2011 MD. SHAHID, MUKHIYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the Mukhiya, Panchayat Secretary and C.D.P.O. are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 419,420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the I.P.C. It is alleged that the informant had higher marks for being selected as Aagan Bari Sevika/ Sahayaka but in her place one Sunita Kumari was selected. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that actually the informant could not be selected because it was found that her husband was in government service which has not been denied specifically by the husband during selection, moreover - 2 - she was not resident of selection zone. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that if any, illegality was committed in selection procedure, then the informant ought to have filed an objection or to get her grievance redressed under the civil forum. Considering the nature of accusation, let the petitioners, Md. Rashid, Bindeshwari Prasad Mandal and Md. Shahid Mukhiya be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Karjain P.S. Case No. 55 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Birpur, District-Supaul, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)