IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.27238-M of 2009 Date of Decision:2.7.2010 Shiv Dayal and others .... Petitioners Versus The State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. A.K. Khunger, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as the same has been rendered infructuous in view of the written statement filed by the State. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 2.7.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE