ast 1 wp3008.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3008 OF 2010 Devendra D. Goregaonkar & Anr. ....Petitioners Vs. Akruti Nirman Ltd. & ors. ....Respondents Ms. A. Castellino i/b. Mr. Diwakar Dwivedi, advocate for petitioners. Mr.J.G.Reddy, advocate for Respondent No.5. Mrs. M.P.Thakur, AGP for Respondent No.6. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.M.SAVANT, JJ DATED:- APRIL 30, 2010 P.C. 1. In deference to the observations made by the Court, the Petitioners through Counsel submits that the Petitioners be permitted to withdraw this petition so that the Petitioners will make representation to the State Government for the reliefs claimed in this Petition. In the circumstances, this Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the Petitioners to pursue such other remedy, as may be permissible by law. 2. If representation is made by the Petitioners, the same will have to be decided on its own merits in accordance with law and this order shall not be ast 2 wp3008.10.sxw construed as conferring any right on the Petitioners by allowing them to make representation or to decide the representation in favour of the Petitioners, as such. 3. Counsel for the Petitioners further submits that since land has been acquired long back, atleast compensation amount should have been made over to the Petitioners. It will be open to the Petitioners to make application before appropriate authority for the said claim, which will be considered expeditiously on its own merits in accordance with law. 4. Petition disposed of on the above terms. (R.M. SAVANT, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)