IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12169 of 2011 SANTOSH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.12798 of 2011 MUKESH SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 28.04.2011 Learned counsel appearing in Cr. Misc. No. 12169 of 2011 points out that in Para-1 of his application, in Section, it has wrongly been mentioned as Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code in place of Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently, converted under Sections 395/412 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the above stated petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of his application within course of the day. Both the above stated petitions arise out of Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 194 of 2010 initially registered under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code but subsequently, converted into Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code and accordingly, both the above stated petitions are being disposed of by this common order. Petitioners are not named in the first information report and it appears that in course of investigation they were arrested in connection with another case and they made their confessional statements. It is alleged that on the basis of their confessional statements stolen statues were recovered from near Bhainsmara Chowk. Moreover, having more or less similar allegation one co- 2 accused Manjit Kumar @ ATM has already been granted privilege of bail by this Court vide order dated 04.04.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10628 of 2011. Accordingly, petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-III, Saran at Chapra in connection with Sessions Trial No. 160 of 2011 corresponding to Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 194 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )