Q> IN THE HIGH COiJRT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.JSlNo. hlfc^ OF 2011. PETITIONER Smt. Kanti Sahu, W/o. Shri Krishna Kumar Sahu, aged about 40 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Hatkungera, Block Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS v -•• \^%// ^^' <€^v : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) 4. Treasury Officer, . Treasury Account and Pension, Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.) £.^^ 5. Joint Director, Treasury Account and Pension, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar at Jagdalpur (C. G.) WRIT PETITION^JNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA r ^ Q^- >;I-HC—7 SiTvSl w RHI+ 'asw 3?R?i siwfi ~?S[ "41<^IW'LI, ^•dl-!-li|(o, rs|Cll'Mlj,< *n*1dl tbNich sn^?i 'q^r ('yii-i'Kt1!) WIWBtet 311^1 SB: Hon'bie Shri 09-38-2011 cdunsel lof two aavance increments on account o? sne order passed by this Court irj increments as per cjrcuiar sat *l<<f<-i<il-1 W^I-S Tf fS^t <P>ltl;l< ^sifgq sil^i ^sL for the petitioner. :v G.A. for the State on advance copy. Shri SomKant verma, Shri Praveen Das, Depijt; Heard. Learned counsei app^aring for the petitioner submits that the petrtloner ss entitled to benetit ! having passed B.!.l. examlna^i! is submitted that the issue in^i inteara and the same has b^en Court in the case of Asha Saxena vs. State of M.P. s Ors.. ved in finalSv decidea ition is no lonaer res It is further submitted tltat this Court has aiso taken a simiiar view in iis order dated 06-02-2009 dassed in Vv.P.(S)No.6257 of' 2008. Learned counsei for the petitiQner furthfcr draws attention of this Court to order dated 29-04-2010 passed in VVrit Apjseai No.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the iudgment of the Supreme Coutt in the case ot Asna Saxena (sypra) and tne another VVrit Appeal No.87/2009, directions have been Issued for consid^ration of the case for arant of two advance •d 21-09-1974 issued bv the State of iviadhva Pradesh, after verirication of trp facts pieaded in the petition. ! Learned counsel for thje State submits that case of t.he petitioner vi/ould also be considered on ine same lines. T Q-H-C—78 ^ST v. Ri-fi'h W SIT^?; **<i=b ^cepa / fio ~5^ •<iwiw'ti, yxil'M'l^, rsldW^'!. COP^'/'IA^ ^^6 WNMT <»>*<I^l •^ sn^5i Tra^7 (lyl^«<<vt!t) ^CTW^f^i ^n^i -^ in vlew of the statementl off with a direction to the respi) ciaim of petitioner for grant of q 21-09-1974 issued by the Stai^ racts pieaaed in the Detrtion witlin «(ii<(f<-l41-<WRJT <i fvS <.fai^;i< ^sJfOT 311^1 made above, this petition is finaliy disposed naent autnorittes to conslder and aeci'de the of advance increments as per ci Madhya Pradesh, after verificaiion or the Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge I'u