W \o HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1094 of2009 PETITIQNER : , Urnashmlgaf s/o Blsahu Ram aged about” 36 yeals, :< working as attendént at Veterinary Dispensmy, Katam, Biéck Lonni: omce of Joint Director, Veterinary Service, Bilaspur (C.G.) Veterinaly Department, D.K.S. ¥ Bhawan, I Mantralaya, Raipur.(C.G.) 3v Joint Director, Veterinary Services, Bilaspur (C.G.) Advocate for the petitianer. VERSUS M WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF TNDIA Shri Y.S.'I‘hakur, Deputy Advocate General for‘the State/- RESPONDENTS : 1. State 6f Chhattisgarh, Through the Secwtary, 2. Director: Veterinary Services: Raipur (CG) Present: Shri P.S.Koshy, Advocate with Shn' Vinod Deshmukh, Respondents. 12m May, 1999 (Annexare P/2), gamed regular pay scale to the petitioner and other similarly situated employees. However, the same was subsequently withdrawn vide order dated 09‘“ February, 2000 (Annexure P13) passed by the respondent No. 3. Being aggn‘eved by the above order, one Vishnu Prasad Dahire hied a petition being Writ Petition (S) No. 3264 “of 2005 (Vishnu Pfasad Dahz're v. State ofMadhya Pradesh & Others) . beforethis Conn and ihe same was allewe (ide order dated 28‘“ Juiy, 2006 I é v {Amnexure P14) am he was he1d entitled for regular pay scale w.e.f. 12 th May, 1999. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant petition may also be disposed of in terms of order passed in‘the matter of Vishnu Prasad Dahire (supra). On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that in case the petitioner files representation against his grievances, the same shall be considered and decided by the competent authority in terms ofthe order passed in the case of Vishnu Prasad Daht're (supra). In view of the above submission of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to make a detailed representation before the respondentNo. 3, raising all his grievances raised in this petition. On such representation being made, the same shall be considered and decided by the competent authority in terms ofthe order passed in Vishnu Prasad Dahz‘re (supra) expeditiously. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri i Judge