H8GH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH. BILASPUR W.P (227 } N0.7352 of 2009 PETITIONER Dubey Travels, Through Bhavesh Dubey, Heera Archade Pandri, New Bus Stand, Raipur Versus RESPONDENTS 1 M/s. ManishTravels, Through Manish Jain, G.E. Road, Durg 2 Regionat Transport Authority, Jagdalpur, District Bastar 3 Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Jagdafpur, DJstrict Bastar 4 State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Mahanadi Khand Ghadi Chowk, Raipur WRIT PETITSON UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Shailendra Bajpai, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents No.2&3. ORALORDER (04.01.2010) SUNILKUMARSINHA.J. Heard. The petitioner, who is respondent No.3 before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal (STAT), Chhattisgarh (Raipur) in Revision Petition No.112/09, has filed this petition chaltenging the vaiidity of the order dated 07.10.2009, whereby, an application for condonation of delay in filing the revision has been aliowed by the Tribunal and the matter has been directed to be fixed for final hearing. ^'3^ 'tb^ \ W.P (227 ) N0.7352 of 2009 shyna Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Tribunal has allowed the application without assigning sufficient reasons for the same. It appears from the records of the writ petition that the impugned order against which the revision was fiied before the STAT was passed on 29.03.2007 and the revision against the said order was filed on 17.08.2009. The respondent No.1 has taken the ground that the respondent was having no knowledge about passing of such an order and as soon as it came into their knowledge, an application was fiied for obtaining the certified copy of the same and after getting the certified copy on 20.07.2009, the revision was filed on 17.08.2009. It appears that the Tribunal has allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the revision with a view to give complete justice to the parties by passing order on merits. 1 do not find any reason to interfere with the said order passed by the Tribunal. The petition has no merit. The same is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summariiy. Sd/- SunaKumarSinha