IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33434 of 2010 1. RAHMAN MIAN 2. MOHAMMAD SADDAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 17.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Allegation is about engagement for marriage of informant’s daughter with petitioner no.2 and refusal to marry for non-fulfillment of demand is denied on the ground that there was no engagement rather there was talk only and petitioners were to enquire regarding character of informant and his family members and in that course, they came to know about pendency of Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No.140/2003, but only to cast pressure this case is lodged. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah West Champaran in connection with Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No.189 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)