'3J> ""EKSae®^- HSGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT_BILA_SPUR W.P.(S) No.4857of200S o,PeSitionsr Haricharan Panji, Son of Shri Late Gopf Ram Panji, Aged about 58 years, Food !nsp®ctor(Good & Drug AdministraUon), Raipur (C.G.) Resident of Usha Gupta Ka Makan, 56, VJvekanand Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. Stete of -Chhatfsgarh, through Secretary, (Food Coniroiier), heafth. M'lnlstry fFood & Dr'ja Admmistration), D.K.S. Bhav/an, Mantraiaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Avar Sachiv ChhatSsgarh Shashan, Lok Swastti & Parivar Kalyan Aur Chikitea Shikchha Vibhag, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Deput/ Director, Food & Druoh Raipur(Dr. Tarun Kumsr^rswaS). 4. Coifecfor, Raipur (C.G.). : Hon'bte Mr. Justfce Satish K. AgnihoSri, J SB: Hon'bte M None for e pefitioner. Shri Sushi' Dubys, Govt. Advocate for ths rsspondente -OR^ER- :tll ( Passed on this 5"' day of Aprit, 2007) T*» Thakur 1. The petitioner has fiiad Shi's pefition chaiisnging the transfer order dated 29.1.2002. By virtue of She interim stay granted by the Madhya Pradesh AdminisSrative Tribunal at Raipur the peSitioner is continuing at frie origlnai place ofposting. 2. Be ShaS as it may, witii She passage of gme this petitfon has become infructuous as period of transfer is not appiicab'te forever. At this polnt of tirne there is no question to examine the validity' of the transfer ordsr. Ho'n'sver, the rsspondente are at iiberty to pass appropriate »?';-I^P<- if&£ SRCy', orders keepsng in view the pubiic intsresS and admini'strative exigi v»ithcu{insisting on compiiancs of fhe impugned fransfsr order. . in vsev/ of the above, this petffion stands disposed of. No order as to costs.