vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION WRIT PETITION WRIT PETITION NO.6976 OF 2005 NO.6976 OF 2005 NO.6976 OF 2005 Prakash Gundu Athane ... Petitioner V/s. Municipal corporation for the City of Sangli-Miraj-Kupwad ... Respondent Mr.M.S. Topkar for Petitioner None for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: OCTOBER 20, 2005 OCTOBER 20, 2005 OCTOBER 20, 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This petition challenges the order of the Labour Court passed in a complaint filed under Item 1 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act. The Labour Court has dismissed the complaint since the Petitioner had not completed 240 days in service and therefore there was no breach of section 25-F, 25-G and 25-H. The Industrial Court in Revision has confirmed the findings of the Labour Court. In my view, there is no error committed by either of the Courts below. When the complainant has not completed 240 days of service, there is no question of sections 25-F, 25-G and 25-H being breached. Petition is, accordingly, rejected.