IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12142 of 2008 TANVIR ALI @ TANVIR MIYAN @ TAVVIR HASSAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5 16.7.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 364, 365/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that one Nand lal and other two co-village boys had gone to cut the grass in the field and it is alleged that they were kidnapped. Two boys managed to hide themselves and gave information to the informant regarding the occurrence. The two boys are Baban Sharma and Rupesh Sharma aged about 12 and 8 years respectively. These boys have categorically taken the name of the petitioner and three other persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant has not taken the name of the petitioner and as such he is entitled to bail. In paragraphs 84 and 85 of the case diary the parents have stated that out of fear of the criminal their son has gone to Delhi and is working there. Learned counsel also submits that the accused Bouku Miyan has been granted bail by this Court. Bouku Miyan has been granted bail because he has not been named by the two boys who had escaped from being kidnapped. Fouzi has been granted bail by this Court on the consideration that the kidnapped boys were not examined in this case. Considering the allegation I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. This bail petition is dismissed. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)