ca5866.11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5866 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.652 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5867 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.655 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5868 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.653 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5869 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.649 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5870 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.656 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5871 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.654 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.S.S. Dande Advocate for Applicant. Shri.G.G. Suryawanshi Advocate for Resp. Nos. 1 & 2 in C.A. NO.5866 of 2011. Shri.G.N. Patil Advocate for Resp. No. 1 in C.A. NOs. 5867 of 2011, 5869 of 2011 and 5871 of 2011. Smt.Anjali Dube Advocate for Resp. Nos. 1 to 6 in C.A. No.5868 of 2011 and for Resp.Nos. 1 to 3 in C.A. No.5870 of 2011. Shri.D.V.Tele, Shri. K.G. Patil, Smt. R.K. Ladda, A.G.P. for Respondent State. .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATE : 2ND MAY, 2011. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. ca5866.11 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders 2. The Applicant M.I.D.C. seeks permission to deposit amount consequent to order passed by this Court on 24th September, 2010. The counsel for the Applicant submits that the amount ought to have been deposited within the stipulated time but due to the reasons mentioned in the Application, the amount could not be deposited. The counsel submits that delay is unintentional and considering the fact that the M.I.D.C. was required to arrange huge amount, the prayer made by the M.I.D.C. be kindly granted. 3. The learned counsel appearing for respective Respondents in these Applications, submitted that M.I.D.C. ought to have complied with the order ca5866.11 3 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders passed by this Court in respect of execution of the award. There is undue delay. But the counsel submits that in case the M.I.D.C. is depositing the amount by tomorrow in this Court, then the M.I.D.C. be permitted to deposit the amount. 4. In the light of the submissions advanced, we allow the M.I.D.C. to deposit the amount as per the order passed by this Court on 24th September, 2010. The Civil Applications are allowed. In case the amount is deposited by tomorrow, the order passed on 24th September, 2010 would be operational. [T.V.NALAWADE,J.] [NARESH H.PATIL,J.] asb/APR11/ca5866.11