IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32626 of 2009 1. Mahesh Singh. 2. Subhash Singh, both sons of Jageshwar Singh, resident of village-Mano (English), P.S.-Suryagarha, District-Lakhisarai. ………Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. ………….Opp. Party. ----------- 2/ 12.11.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State. Petitioners are agnates of the informant. The case has been instituted for offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Case and counter case have been instituted by the parties against each other. Counsel for the petitioners submits that on the basis of concocted injury report, the informant’s side tried to make the case more serious. A medical Board was constituted under the orders of the District Magistrate for verifying the genuineness of the injury report. But the injured person refused to appear before the Board. Considering these facts that the dispute relates to landed property and the parties are related to each other, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioners is allowed. They are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their appearance before the court below within a period of four weeks from today and on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection 2 with Suryagarha P.S. Case No. 99 of 2009 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)