IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP.No. 2631 of 2009. Date of Decision:8.9.2010.. _______________________________________________ Krishan Dutt and others. ….Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. ….Respondent. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. Whether approved for reporting1? No. For the petitioner :Mr. Rupinder Singh, Advocate. For Respondent. :Mr.P.K.Sharma, Addl. Advocate General. Dev Darshan Sud, J.(Oral). The grievance of the petitioners in this case is covered by the decision of this Court in CWP. No. 1901 of 2008 titled Ram Gopal and others Vs. State of H.P. and others decided on 14th July, 2009. It is undisputed before me that the petitioners have been working as Part- time Chowkidars for a period exceeding ten years as detailed by them in this petition. It is also undisputed before me that the decision in Ram Gopal’s case has not been challenged in other proceedings. The direction in Ram Gaoal’s case was: “Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, the respondents are directed to take decision for giving the daily wager status to petitioners No. 5,6 and 12 on the basis of Annexure R-5 within a Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment? . 2 period of six weeks from today. It is made clear that the persons, who have not completed ten years as Part-time Revenue Chowkidar up to 31.12.2003 are not entitled for the status of daily wager”. Learned counsel has also referred to the notification Annexure:P1 as filed with this writ petition. In these circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioners shall be granted daily waged status along with other benefits in terms of the judgment passed in CWP. No. 1901 of 2008 as also in terms of notification Annexure:P1 as filed in this petition. The respondents shall comply with this direction within a period of six weeks from today. The petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. Let a copy of judgment passed in CWP. No. 1901 of 2008 titled Ram Gopal and others Vs. State of H.P. and others be placed on the record of this case. (Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. September 8, 2010(R)