" wmwmm ' w ? ’ I?? BEFORE THE :HON'BLE HIGH COURT OFfCHHATTISGARH IAT BILASPUR WRIf pETITIoN'(S)_Ivo. ' 1g?“ / 2011‘ pETITIONER: _ \ /( Kumar Yadav, ‘ RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . W S/o Late Mangal Prasad Yadav - x’l Agedrabout 35 years R/o Thakurpara‘” Ward, No.7, Takhatpur, District Bilaspur,‘ ‘ WA C.G. I VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. / State of Chhattisgarh, . Through the Secretary Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawa‘n ‘Mantral‘aya, Raipur; C.G. /2. Commissioner, Land Record, Raipur, C.G. /3. Collector, Voistrict Durg, C.G. /4. Upper Collector, v Durg, C.G. . i HIGH COURT OF CHHATI‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 1521 0f2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON S'I‘lTUTlON OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present. Shn Am 5mg]. Advocate for the petltloner Shrl Y ta Thalwr Deputy Advocate General for the State/ respondents ORDER ORAL (Passed on 22“ day ofMarch, 2011) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that he wants to pursue his representation pending before the respondent authorities. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no obj ection. 3’ It is ordered accordingly. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn With‘the Sd/- Y SATISH K. ANGNH-IORI Judge aforestated observations. PETITIONER Pradeep Kumar Yadav. VERSUS RESPONDENTS State ofChhattisgarh & Others.