RESPONDENTS WR!T PFTlTinM (Ct Mn son? nf ?nn7 Sijfi^ a a fan a « t i^i«'tja_t^tiit^^'a^F.^atf^_Li_^_^*,^fw< Umesh Pradhan S/o Chhattar Singh Pradhan, Aged about-45 years, Asstetant Teacher, Primary School, Keshla, Biock- Pusour, District - Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Schoo! Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan.Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director, Public instruction, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Btock Education Ofticer, Block-Pusour, Dtetrict Ralgarh (C.G.) PETITiON UNDER ARTiCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF iNDIA Singie Bench : Hon'ble IVlr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Shri Sanjay Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. A.nju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate forth.e respondents/State. B/- (Passed on this 11tn day of July, 2007) The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to reguiar pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probatian period. • ' Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as weil as for the respondents/'State Jointly submit that the facts ancl questlon of law involved in the present wnt petition are the same to t'nat of in VV.P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Thwari and others vs. State Sovernment of Ctihattisgarh and othars), which was aliowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. tn view of the above-stated submissions made by iearned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms, subject to verincation of the facts. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotn Judge