1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4088/2004. Mahesh Chand. VS The AD.J.No.1, Alwar & Ors. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4088/2004. Mahesh Chand. VERSUS The Additional District Judge No.1, Alwar and Others. 12.08.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Pankaj Jain, for the petitioners. Mr.R.K.Mathur, for the respondents. ***** Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition has been filed against the order refusing the temporary injunction by the two courts below. This court after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner on 05.07.2004 while issuing notices to the respondents passed the following interim order:- “In the meanwhile, status quo as it exists today shall be maintained. The interim order will be operative only after the service upon the respondents.” It is not in dispute that the aforesaid interim order remained operative since 05.07.2004. Learned counsel for the parties are not in a position to state before this court as to what is the status of suit before the learned trial court. Though, this court had on an earlier occasion on 05.03.2008 inquired from the learned 2 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4088/2004. Mahesh Chand. VS The AD.J.No.1, Alwar & Ors. counsel for the parties regarding the present position of the suit pending before the learned trial court but even today learned counsel for the parties are not in a position to state as to what is the present position of the suit pending before the learned trial court. Be that as it may, without reflecting on the merits of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, I deem it just and proper to make the interim order date 05.07.2004 absolute so as to last till the final disposal of the suit with the condition that the learned trial court with the cooperation of the parties would take steps to decide the suit filed in the year 2001 within a period of six months from the receipt of the certified copy of this order. As has been stated above, this court has not dealt with the merits of the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and the fact that the interim order being made absolute to last till the final disposal of the suit, should not be taken as an expression of opinion on the merits of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.