IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.3313 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.3313 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.3313 OF 2008 Suresh Narayan Patil, .. Applicant. Vs State of Maharashtra, .. Respondent Mr P.R.Arjunwadkar, for the applicant. Mr J.P.Yagnik, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 14/10/2008 DATE : 14/10/2008 DATE : 14/10/2008 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard Mr.Arjunwadkar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr Yagnik, learned APP, for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.I-70/2008 of Padgha Police Station. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and three others for having committed an offence punishable under sections 326, 325, 327 read with 34 of IPC. It is alleged that the applicant at the relevant time was armed with sword, while the other three accused were armed with sticks and iron rod and they all assaulted the complainant Santosh, Baliram Patil, Sanjay Patil and Laxman. It appears from the FIR that the present applicant is the author of the injury sustained by Baliram and Laxman. Baliram seems to have sustained an injury on his left arm, which is described as grievous in nature, while Laxman sustained only one injury on head, which is described as simple in nature by the Medical Officer. The complainant sustained one grievous injury and he has attributed that injury to another accused, who was armed with iron rod. The other three accused have already been released on bail and in view thereof I find no reason to refuse bail to the present applicant. Hence, I pass the following order. 3. The applicant be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.20,000/-, with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, on the condition that the applicant shall report to the concerned police station on first and third Saturday of every month between 10 and 11 am till the conclusion of the trial. 4. While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case without being influenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)