CRM No. M 32447 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 32447 of 2010 Date of decision: 31.01.2011 Sita Devi and others ........ Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Surender Singh, Advocate for Mr.Inderjit Sharma , Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana for the respondent - State Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the private respondents. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of directions to respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No. 4 to 10. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that petitioner No. 1 is not even being allowed to visit the Court or the Tehsildar's office for the purpose of property transaction or otherwise. On the other hand, learned State counsel on instructions from CRM No. M 32447 of 2010 2 ASI Gurcharan Singh, states that there is no danger to the life of petitioner No. 1. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that in case, petitioner No. 1 wants to visit any of the Court or Tehsildar's office or any other such office, respondents no. 4 to 10 shall not come in her way and the SHO, Police Station Naraingarh shall provide necessary security to petitioner No. 1 to be able her to visit the said office. It is, however, made clear that the said order shall have no bearing on the legality or illegality of any document so executed by the petitioner No. 1. Disposed of accordingly. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 31.01.2011 mohan