cp410.10 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ CONT. PETITION NO. 410 OF 2010 ,In WP/434/2010 ,With CA/1601/2011 ,In CP/410/2010 TEEGALLA VENKATESH S/O SATYANNA VENKATESH VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Mr.Kasliwal A.H. AGP for Respondent(s): Mr.D.V. Tele. ... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. Dated: August 03, 2011 ... Heard. 2 This matter was heard in morning session. It was kept back at 4 p.m. at the request of the learned AGP to seek written instructions from the Collector, Nanded. Accordingly, the learned AGP has received written instructions from the Collector, Nanded wherein it is stated that on behalf of the Collector, Nanded apology may be tendered. It is further stated the Collector, cp410.10 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ Nanded is ready to call tenders for fresh auction for the year, 2011-12. Copy of the said letter dt.3.8.2011 is taken on record and marked as "X" for identification purpose. 3 The learned Counsel for the petitioner tried to argue the matter further. In the light of the contents of the letter written by the Collector, Nanded to the Government Pleader, which is taken on record, no further adjudication of this contempt petition is necessary. The Collector in his letter has also stated that he will initiate tender process from 1st September, 2011. 4 It is relevant to mention that once notices are issued in the contempt petition, necessarily, the matter is between the Court and the alleged contemnor. In case of Supreme Court Bar Association vs. Union of India and another [(1998) 4 SCC 409], the Supreme Court observed cp410.10 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ that party who brings to the notice of the court the contumacious conduct is only an informant and not a litigant. 5 In this view of the matter, contempt petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. Civil Application do not survive and stands disposed of. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) PLK/*