IH[:_ME_HI6eLCO £_ M^BTAE&,ffl>Ei JAB.ALPP^. ?it Peti.ttain Bo, ^. c; St 795. PECISJSHBRs Tedis Edueatisn Saeiety, Begistra'fcisa ?o, 5343, tMroagti its Sesretary Sirl V.K» V6i*aa,Seepat road, Bilaspur, •bdisil & distci.at -Bilaspar (M.P.) yersas BBSPOMBfflTSs. I* Sfafe ®f t&roagh s 2he~ Qblef SeQvetaxy Qoveysae&t of Madaya PTadeshj Vallate Bhawan, Bfeopal (M.P.: 8. Assis'taat Laboar Coamlsslaaer (Appellate- Aath.ority aader tfa 1958), Bllaspm* (M.P.) 5. Ssfb^ Saaeeta Qapte, wlfs »f Sbri Uday A'aa &apte, resldeat of Silafc Naga-, Bilaspar, tahsil & distrie't - Bilaspur. (M.P.) ®I2PEITIOS ima JB.'EICISS. 22S & 827 OF 2SB GO^SiSTKIW CTBXAF®IS®jUiGBCS'A W&I! IB IBE BAS'BKB Q7 G'SSSIQSi&l, 'SW>WBS ^ JF,@ t aiiiiBLB is&ra. OBBBI OR BiascsiGK. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^ Writ Petition No. 4054 of 1995 Petitioner Vedic Education Society Versus Respondent State of Madhya Pradesh and others Siii^le Beach : HonTile Mr. Justice Satish K. Apiihotri. None for fhe petitioner. Shri Suiul Otwani, Panel lawyer for fhe respondent No. 1. Shri S.P. Kale, counsel for the respondent No. 3. m Bablu ORAL ORDER (7tb March, 2006) The foUowiag order of the Court was passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. The niatter was caUed for hearing twice. On bofh fhe occasious, aone appeared nor aay representation was inade on behalf of the petitioner. 2. In view of the above, fhe petition stends disniissed for non-proseciition. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge