IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.119 of 2007 1. Bindu Yadav 2. Nago yadav 3. Guneshwar Yadav 4. Asharfi Yadav 5. Yogeshwar Yadav 6. Bishundeo Yadav 7. Hari Yadav All sons of late Ramcharitra Yadav and residents of village Pachhara Bujurg, P. O. Bargaon, P. S. Kusheshwar Asthan and District Darbhanga. …Defendants/Petitioners Versus 1. JIVACH YADAV 2. Sheo Nandan Yadav 3. Raghu Nandan Yadav All sons of late Tunak Lal Yadav and residents of village Pachhara Bujurg, P. O. Bargaon, P. S. Kusheshwar Asthan District Darbhanga. …Plaintiffs-opposite parties 4. Sri Chandra Kant Jha 5. Sri Chandra Shekhar Jha 6. Sri Narayan Jha All sons of late Gauri Shankar Jha and residents of village and P. O. Nawadah, P. S. Bahera, District- Darbhanga. … Defendant 1st Parties- opposite parties 7. Sri Krishna Kant Jha 8. Sri Heera Kant Jha 9. Sri Sheela Kant Jha All sons of Late Saryug Kant Jha 10. Sri Lalan Jha 11. Madan Jha Both sons of Raghubansh Jha 12. Sri Ashok Jha son of Rewati Raman Jha 13. Vimal Ojhayeen, widow of late Phani Bhushan Jha 14. Indra Bhushan Jha son of late Phani Bhushan Jha All residents of village and P. O. Nawadah, P. S. Bahera and District Darbhanga. … Defendants-2nd parties-opposite parties For the Petitioners …. Md. Abu Haider, Adv. Smt.Jahan Ara, Adv. ------- 2. 22.06.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2 This civil revision has been filed by the defendants challenging order dated 17.10.2006 by which the learned Munsif, Biraul at Benipur has allowed the petition of the plaintiffs for amendment of their plaint in Title Suit No. 11 of 2002. From the arguments as well as from the material on record and the impugned order it is quite apparent that after due consideration of facts and circumstances, learned court below has found that the amendment sought by the plaintiffs were either formal in nature or merely explanatory not changing the nature of the suit. This Court does not find any illegality or any jurisdictional error in the impugned order of the learned court below and accordingly, this civil revision is dismissed. The defendants will be at liberty to exercise their right of rebuttal. kanchan (S. N. Hussain, J.)