IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37535 of 2008 Rahul Kumar, son of Sheodani Prasad, Mohalla Bairagi, PS Delha, Dist. Gaya – Petitioner. Versus State Of Bihar 2 19.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by order, dated 12.5.2008 passed in Patrakar Nagar PS Case No. 165/2007 by the C.J.M, Patna by which cognizance has been taken against him for the offences under sections 366, 366A and 376(2)(G) read with section 120B of the Penal Code, despite the fact, that a final report was submitted after investigation as far as the petitioner is concerned. The court has differed from the final report and took cognizance. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the victim girl has not named the petitioner as one of the miscreants in her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. and , therefore, he cannot be tried in this case merely on suspicion. These aspects of the matter cannot be a ground for exonerating the petitioner for the present. I accordingly direct that the court should take steps to expedite the trial of the case. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)