IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 11-06-2008 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.33966 of 2006 (O.A.No.6056 of 1994) E.Jeyanthi .. Petitioner. Versus 1. The Director of Town Panchayat, Kuralagam, Madras-600 108. 2.The District Collector, Chengai M.G.R.District, Kanchipuram, Chengai M.G.R.District. 3.The District Town Panchayat Officer, The District Collector Office, Kanchipuram, Chengai M.G.R.District. 4.The Executive Officer (Special Grade) Mamallapuram Town Panchayat, Mamallapuram, Chengai M.G.R.District. 5.V.Ravikumar .. Respondents. Prayer: This petition has been filed seeking for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records pertaining to the order passed by the first respondent, the Director of Town Panchayat in his proceedings Na.Ka.24816/94/A2, dated 18.11.94, and quash the same in so far as the 5th respondent is concerned and to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the applicants name for appointment to the post of Typist sanctioned in G.O.(P) 37 RD & L.A. Department dated 2.3.93. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Thennan For Respondents : Mr.B.K.Girish Neelakantan Government Advocate O R D E R This petition has been filed by the petitioner, praying that this Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner in the cadre of typist in Mamallapuram Town Panchayat. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the Tamilnadu Administrative Tribunal had passed an interim order in O.A.No.6056 of 1994, dated 20.12.94, directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner as a typist in the Mamallapuram Town Panchayat, on a regular basis. However, contrary to the directions issued by the Tribunal, the third respondent had appointed the 5th respondent, namely, V.Ravikumar, as a typist. The petitioner had filed a miscellaneous application in M.A.No.936 of 1995 in O.A.No.6056 of 1994. The Tribunal had passed an order, dated 24.3.95, directing the respondents to post the applicant as a typist in Mamallapuram Township, within two weeks from the date of the said order. Challenging the said order of the Tribunal, dated 24.3.1995, the Director of Town Panchayat, Chennai, had filed a review application in R.A.No.99 of 1995. By an order, dated 13.12.95, the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal had directed the respondents to appoint the petitioner forthwith and had also stated that action would be taken against the respondents for contempt of Court on their failure to do so. It has been further submitted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the said order had become final and the petitioner had been appointed as a typist on a regular basis in the Mamallapuram Town Panchayat, based on the said order of the Tribunal, dated 13.12.1995. In such circumstances, no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. 3. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, this writ petition stands closed, as no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar csh To 1. The Director of Town Panchayat, Kuralagam, Madras-600 108. 2.The District Collector, Chengai M.G.R.District, Kanchipuram, Chengai M.G.R.District. 3.The District Town Panchayat Officer, The District Collector Office, Kanchipuram, Chengai M.G.R.District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.The Executive Officer (Special Grade) Mamallapuram Town Panchayat, Mamallapuram, Chengai M.G.R.District. 1 cc To Mr.K.Thennan, Advocate, SR.28455. 1 cc To The Government Pleader, SR.28760. Writ Petition No.33966 of 2006 RB(CO) RVL 24.06.2008 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/