1N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR lC.G. 5g; g / 2010 WRIT PETITION (S) NO. (/ Varéha Mehar D/o Shri Babu1a1 Mehar Aged—about 29 yeaxs, R/o MIG 11/12, Maharan Pratap Nagar, Korba, Distt— Korba [C.G.] PETITIONER VERSUS / 'RESPoNDENTs 1.State of Chhattisgaxh Through— Secretary, Higher Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.] V’ 2. Public Service Commission [PSC] Through-Secretary, Shankar Nagar Road, Rajpur [C.G.} WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTIONS , HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI5GARH AT BILASPUR DIVI$ION BENCH HON’BLE SHRI I.M. QUDDUSI & HON’BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, 3.3. w.P.(s) No.5833/2o1o Mr. Sumeer Singhf Advocafe For The pe‘l’ifioner. Mr. V.5. Thakur, Dy. Adv. 6eneral For fhe respondenf No.1. Mr. A. Sinha, Adv. For “the respbndanf NeZ. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 28*" July 2011) I. M.Quddusi,.7 1. Heard. 2. By way of This pe'rifion ‘rhe petifioner has prayed for a direc‘rion To The respondent No.2 1'0 Take fhe inferview of 'rhe pe‘ri‘rioner‘and if she found eligible, she may be given appoinfmen‘r on The post of Assis‘ronf Professor (Zoology). 3. Briefly s‘l'a'fed, facfs of fhe case are 'l'ha‘l’ respondent-Public Service Commission published an adverfisemen‘r inviTing opplicnfions from 'rhe eligible candidates for appoin'rmeni' on The posfs of Assisfani' Professors in differen'r Governmenf Colleges of fhe S’ra're of Chhm‘fisgarh. As per educafional qualification clause of the advertisement a candidate, who has passed NET examination conducted by CSER/UGC or SLET examination conducted by the State Government, is only‘ eligible to apply for the said post. However, as per second proviso to Clause 3.1 (b) of the advertisement, the said condition is not applicable to a candidate having M. Phil degree in the concerned subject. The petitioner also appiied for the post of Assistant Professor (Zoology) and appeared in the examination conducted by the respondent concerned in which she was declared successful and PETITIONERS Var-sha Mehar Vs ikESPONDENTS State of Chhm'fisgar-h & ofher-s Presan'f: Page 2 of 2 caned for imerview. However, she was expelied by The Interview Commi‘r’ree from interview on The ground Thm‘ she is having degree of M.Sc. in Bio-Science, whereas required quniifica'rion for fhe pos’r of Assismn‘r Professor (Zoology) is M.Sc. Zooiogy. 4. Before en‘rering in‘ro meri'rs of The case, learned counsel appearing for The respondents prayed for dismissal of The present pe‘rifion on had become infrucTuous because The fhe ground ‘rha'r The same inTerview had already been over and now The only relief claimed by The peTiTioner in This wriT peTiTion i.e. of Taking her inTerview, cannoT be granTed aT This sTage. 5. In view of above submission, we have perused The relief clause of The peTiTion and found ThaT submission made by The learned counsei for The respondenTs has force. 6. Accordingly, The insTanT peTiTion is dismissed as having become infr9£%l J ’I” Sdl- ~ Sdl‘ , N.K. Agrawal LM-Quddus‘ Judge Judge ‘ 7 7 r Roshani—