ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPNAY COMPNAY COMPNAY PETITION NO.561 OF PETITION NO.561 OF PETITION NO.561 OF 2004 2004 2004 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - None present. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 12th July, 2007 : 12th July, 2007 : 12th July, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The claim in the present petition is for Rs.3,76,153. The statutory notice was given on 28/05/2004. There was no reply to the same. The petitioner, therefore, has filed the present petition on 25/06/2004. 2. On 10th March, 2005, this Court, as non appeared for the company in spite of the service, admitted the matter and directed the petitioner to comply with all the formalities of advertisements. ( 2 ) 3. The affidavit of service dated 20th March, 2006 is the part of the record. 4. None appeared for the company. There is no defence or resistance made to the averments made in the petition as well as to the statutory demand notice in question. 5. Therefore, taking all this into account and in view of the above facts and as the claim is within limitation, the petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). 6. The concerned parties to take necessary steps in accordance with law. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.)