hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9625 OF 2009 Sammy D. Kataria ... Petitioner Versus Sanjeev M. Jhangiani and Ors. ... Respondents Ms. Archana Khan for Petitioner. Mr.Haresh Mansukhani for R. No. 1. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 25, 2009 P.C. A decree was obtained by Respondent No. 1 against Respondent No. 3. In proceedings for execution, the execution of decree was obstructed by the father of the Petitioner herein. Obstructionist Proceedings were taken out which ultimately culminated in the order against father of the present petitioner. The matter ultimately reached to this court by way of Writ Petition No 550 of 2004. On 23rd January, 2004, this court dismissed that petition. Time was granted to vacate subject to undertaking to be filed by the late father of the Petitioner. It appears that thereafter father expired and thereafter proceedings were taken being present petition on record. The present petitioner also resisted handing over possession. The matter reached this court by way of Writ Petition No. 6673 of 2007. By an order dated 28.11.2007, the petition was dismissed and a direction that the Petitioner will hand over possession within six months without seeking any further extension. An undertaking was filed before this court in December, 2007. Petitioner has not complied with the same. But has come with the present petition to challenge various orders. In our opinion, this is total abuse of process of this court. There are judgments against apart from father, against Petitioner himself who had given undertaking. In these circumstances, petitioner does not deserve any sympathy from this Court. Hence, Petition dismissed within a cost quantified at Rs.5,000/- to be paid to State Legal Authority within two weeks from today. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (F,I. REBELLO,J.)