MC 563/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. RK Agarwal, learned counsel for the application and also heard Ms. K. Dutta, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. This application is filed seeking rectification of the typographical error in th e Court’s order dated 7/2/11 passed in WP'No.725/11. It is pointed out by Mr. Agarwal that in the second paragraph of the order, the concerned section of the Motor Vehicle Act ought to have been written as Section 114 instead of Section 14. Similarly, in pargarph-3, Rule 92 of the Assam Mo tor Vehicle Rules was erroneously referred to as Rule 32. In view of above typographical errors noticed in the Court’s order dated 7/2/11, this misc. case stands allowed by recording that reference made in the Court’s order dated 7/2/11 should be rectified as Section 114 of the Assam Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 and Rule 92 of the Assam Motor Vehicles Rules, 2003 instead of, as re corded. This corrective order is issued accordingly.