IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2700 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2700 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2700 OF 2007 Akthar Hussain Moideen Shaikh. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2910 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2910 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2910 OF 2007 Sherbahadur Khan Akram Khan. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. H.E.Mooman for the applicant (in Cr.Appln.No.2700/2007). Prakash Shetty for the applicant (in Cr.Appln.No.2910/2007). Ms.S.D.Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 9th October 2007. DATED: 9th October 2007. DATED: 9th October 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The learned A.P.P., appearing for the State, submits that the trial has already commenced. In this view of the matter, learned counsel for the applicants in both the applications seeks permission to withdraw their applications. Accordingly, they are permitted to withdraw applications. 3. The Sessions Court is directed to try the case with expeditious dispatch without granting any adjournment to the accused. Needless to mention that on fresh cause of action on fresh circumstances, the applicants would not be debarred from making any application for bail. 4. With the above observations, applications stand dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE