1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 993 OF 2010 ,With APPLN/1356/2011 ,In APPLN/993/2010 ,With APPLN/2789/2011 ,In APPLN/993/2010 ANUP ARVIND KULKARNI AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR ... -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. Rahul G.Joshi, Adv., for the applicants. Mr.N.B.Patil, APP for State. Mr.J.R.Pawar, Adv., h/f Mr. Hemant Surve, Adv., for respondent no.2. ... CORAM: A.H.JOSHI AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATE:OCTOBER 20th, 2011 1. Heard. 2. Perused the FIR. Learned Advocate for the applicants wants the FIR to be quashed on the ground that the case is that of medical termination of pregnancy, contrary to the desire of the victim, but is that of miscarriage, and hence no offence whatsoever was committed. 3. What is argued is in the nature of defence and is liable to be scanned in the process of investigation or put up as a defence in the event of trial. 2 4. We are, therefore, satisfied that the applicants do not have a case for grant of bail. 5. The Application (No.993/2010) has no merit and is dismissed. Other applications (Nos. 1356 and 2789 both of 2011) do not survive and are disposed of. 6. All points and liberties, as are available in law to the applicants, are kept open. (A.R.JOSHI) (A.H.JOSHI) JUDGE JUDGE ... agp/993-10crapl