1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 912 OF 2009 Ismail S/o Abdulbhai Raj ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. ... Respondents. -------- Mr. S.A. Nagarsoge, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. S.D. Kaldate, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 1 to 3 -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & SHRIHARI P DAVARE,JJ. DATE: 25th September 2009 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) Considering the relationship betwen the parties i.e., the petitioner and the Respondent No. 4 the daughter-in-law, as disclosed in complaint Exhibit ‘F’, we find that, the petitioner has alternate efficacious remedies. 2 3) In exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction under article 226 we decline to interfere in the matter. 4) The Criminal Writ Petition is dismissed. It is clarified there is no expression on merits of the matter. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) sdm/912.09 3