^ ^' 4,^ ^^©/!.!t.r-' T**'*'^ 's.^**.' ^•1('^7&^ ...•-''<'>-t.-\"'^\.^'"' - ...-••"C^^V-"" ^•<l^cpi"^i"" ' ' A--" -e^-^^^_. INTHE HON'BLE HI6H CQURTQF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR C:Q: WRFT PETETK3N f S VNO. SL^ OF2Q10 ...j'; ^ ^-. . .:;;..._. . , _. •-— ; - '• PETTTEONER : Rajeshwar yadav S/o. Late Shri Firanta Ram Yadav, aged about 35 Years, Occupation - Service, Posted as Assistant Grade-IEE P.W. D. BaloudabQJarDivisiOnBaloudabajare,, Distt.- RaipurR/o^Poqnchsheel Ncgqr, PWD Colony Baloudabajar, bistt.-Ra(pur(C.G.) VERSUS RESPON&ENTS : 1. TheStayeofGhhattiSgarh.through theSeci'-etary P.W.D., D.K.S. Bhawan RaiptIr{C.6.) 2. ChiefEngineer/PublicWorks Department Raipur, Distt.- Raipur ExecutiveEngineer, PublicWorks :&eportment Balouckibcyar Division, tSistt.- Raipur (C:6.) yogenclrayerma, Assistaht firade -IIT, Pubfic Works Depdrtrrtent BgloudaBajar, Distt.- RaipurfC.6.) WRIT PETITCON UN6ER ARTECLES 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTEON OF IN&IA FOR ISSUEANCE OF APPfeOPRIATE WRIT sn^s w K-u* WII SII^T W11SI! + + ^=T •<11^1<'1'i1,01l1'M<llo, 'fattll'My ^....u..^a;...d?.:...z.^.^6 SI^T -q3R7 (^lfg^^) TCiWHfttisn^ iii'ffyil'f tiiiraf'? ft'at TPR5R ^Ratfinsi^t Stei^istawa, J. SB: Hon'ble Shrl Maaladra M< 2.7.2010 Shri Sunil Sahu, couasel jfor thc petidoner. Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel ^awyer for fhe State, on advance copy. Heard. Petrdoner's grievance is t|iat (hough vide order dated 27.6.2009 (Annexiire P-l), he was traasferJTed to Balodabazar, where he jolned on 9.7.2009, the chat^e of fhe pd^t of Accountent is not being handed over to fl^e petitioner. Learaed coiuisel for fUie respondent No.4 was also trans^ vide order dated 27.6.2009 (Am^exi reUeved. Leamed counsel for thd issued to respondents No. 2 coinpUance of fhe order datei^ consider and decide petition^r's (Annexure P-5). Froin perusal of the ordeil seen fhat petitioner was transf{ fhat he joiaed at Balodabzar 27.6.2009 (Annexure P-3) als<| transferred to Gariyaband, petitioner further subimts fhat ;rred fi'oni Balodabazar to Gariyaband .exure P-3), but he tms not so far been petitioner prays tfaat directiou inay be & 3 to reUeve respondent No.4 in 27,6.2009 (Annexure P-3) aad to representation dated 13.4.1990 dated 27.6.2009 (Annexure P-1), it is fcrred to Balodabazar. It is submitted 9.7.2009, A perusal of order dated shows that respondeat No.4 was ^ver, he has beenjtiowa as Assislant Otl howfcver f f ^*3.-1S.>^;;._ ^ '% % V S *^l!y XI-HC—78 '3^ ^ff^RTT, ^ftWTS, fslMI'yy <nwir sh^i^i a^l'q'R? (1?f3^1') 31'^IW R-f ^T 3Tt^?T sR-jt^) wnwCTBaaii^i z- i»wid4-<WRif 4ft^ <l"lt4K ^;3ifinaii%?i GTadc-II. Leamed counscl fori respondent No.4 is Assmtent Assislant,,Qrade-Jl, in order datei? ^^! ».,8D (uaWPetitioDfi:r has t Govcmiaent, respondents No. execute the Govemiaent's order.l In this view of the matter, act ia accordaace with fhje 27.6.2009 (Aanexure P-1) b petitioner's representation dated With fhe aforesaid directio off. the petitioner submits that< in facti Grade-III, but wrongty shown as 27.6.2009 (Attncxure P-3). ;en traasferred by order of the State & 3 are duty bouad to cany out and respondents No. ,2 & 3 arc directed to Govemmenfs transfer order dated taking appropriate decteion on 13.4.2010 (Armexure P-5). is, ftie petltion stands fiaiaUy disposed ^f '//^ Sdf- s , Manindra Mohan Shrivastavai Judge