IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH JANUARY 2011 / 29TH POUSHA 1932 LA.App..No. 492 of 2009() ------------------------- LAR.186/2005 of SUB COURT, THALASSERY .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENTS NO.2. ------------------------------- MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSIDC, REPRESENTED BY ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, KSIDC, KESTON ROAD, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOBY CYRIAC RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS 1 TO 4 AND R1. --------------------------------------- 1. KONGATTU DASAN, VAYALIL VEEDU, P.O.MOORIYAD, KANNUR. 2. K.MANOHARAN, VAYALIL VEEDU,P.O.MOORIYAD, KANNUR. 3. K.VASANTHA, VAYALIL VEEDU,P.O.MOORIYAD, KANNUR. 4. K.JANARDHANAN, VAYALIL VEEDU,P.O.MOORIYAD, KANNUR. 5. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: HARUN-UL-RASHID, J ---------------------------- L.A.A.NO.492 OF 2009 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of January, 2011 JUDGMENT The Managing Director, KSIDC who is the requisitioning authority is the appellant. The appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in LAR No.186/2005 on the file of the Sub Court, Thalassery. A small extent of 0.617 cents of land was acquired for the purpose of road widening for Industrial Growth Centre, Kuthuparambu as per a notification dated 30-01-2001. The Land Acquisition Officer fixed the land value at the rate of Rs.2,148/- per cent, the reference court enhanced the land value and re-fixed at the rate of Rs.10,000/- per cent. I have gone through the impugned judgment. The claim is for enhanced compensation of Rs.30,000/- per cent. The extent acquired is less than a cent. Considering the said fact, I do not think that it is necessary to examine the contentions raised by the appellant that the land value fixed by the court below is on a higher side. The said contentions can be considered in an appropriate case. Therefore, I do not propose to accept the L.A.A.NO.492 OF 2009 2 grounds of appeal and to interfere with the fixation of the land value. The appeal fails and accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE pm