IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REVIEW No.233 of 2008 1. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER(DEVELOPMENT AND PERSONNEL BANKING), LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, PATNA. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, AMNOUR BRANCH, STATE BANK OF INDIA, SARAN ----------------------------PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS. Versus KESHAV BHARTIYA, SON OF H.K.P. ASTHANA, RESIDENT OF SUMATI PATH, RANIGHAT, MOHALLA MAHENDRU, P.S. SULTANGANJ, TOWN AND DISTRICT PATNA-------------------OPPOSITE PARTY/PETITIONER. ----------- 3. 18.02.2009. Perused the order of this Court dated 30.6.2008 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3587 of 2001, which is sought to be reviewed on the ground that Keshav Bhartiya having taken the retiral dues in terms of order dated 5.7.1999, Annexure-1 of C.W.J.C. No. 3587 of 2001 and Annexure-E of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent Bank, proceeded to challenge the same and this Court passed the order dated 30.6.2008 setting aside the order dated 5.7.1999 without noticing the fact that petitioner had already taken the retiral dues in terms of the instruction contained in order dated 5.7.1999. Such fact was required to be brought to the notice of this court while the writ petition was being considered and the Bank having not brought the said fact to the notice of this Court, order dated 30.6.2008 was passed. In the circumstances this Court is not inclined to review the order of this Court dated 30.6.2008 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3587 of 2001 on the ground which was not agitated when such order was passed. Accordingly, review application is dismissed. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha,J.)