IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28165 of 2010 MOTI PANDEY @ MAKESHWAR PANDEY & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 26.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Admittedly, petitioner no. 1 is brother-in- law whereas petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law of the deceased. The marriage of deceased had taken place in the year 2007, but she died in hospital on account of burn injuries. The specific stand of the petitioners is that the deceased was in engulfed into fire while she was cooking meal. To fortify the aforesaid contention learned counsel for the petitioners referred to Annexure-3 in which the doctor, who first treated the deceased, has specifically mentioned that the patient reported the cause of burn on account of cooking. Apart from this the informant has filed a petition before learned Sessions Judge, Sitamarhi mentioning this fact that he lodged the above stated 2 case under misconception. In view of the aforesaid facts petitioners, namely Moti Pandey @ Makeshwar Pandey and Sumitra Devi, in the event of their arrest / surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of this order in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 86 of 2009, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar at Sitamarhi, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Amit ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)