IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5719 of 2010 HEERA RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.02.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 392 of the Penal Code for looting a motorcycle on the point of a pistol is that the FIR is against two unknown when his name has transpired on confession of co- accused Nidhi Mahto, himself granted bail in Cr. Misc. No. 45009 of 2008. The impugned order of rejection notices that the petitioner has antecedent of motorcycle loot earlier also. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 40,000/- (Forty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Saran at Chapra in Isuapur PS Case No. 16 of 2008. Both the sureties must be father and mother of the petitioner respectively whose photographs and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail bonds and shall be verified by the court below through the Police before enlarging the petitioner on bail. In the event that the petitioner absconds the court below shall equally be at liberty to proceed against the sureties if circumstances so warrants. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)