IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 395 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Rajeev A. Masih S/o Sri John A. Masih 2. John A. Masih S/o Sri Aslam Masih 3. Ms. Florance A. Masih W/o Sri John A. Masih 4. Km. Rachna A. Masih D/o John A. Masih All R/o 79 Govind Park, Street No. 22, Som Bazar, Chandra Nagar, Delhi-51. .......... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal. 2. Ms. Vimmy A. Masih W/o Rajeev A. Masih, D/o Samual Roy, R/o 13/III, Medical Colony, Sector-1, BHEL, Ranipur, District Haridwar. .......... Respondents Mr. S.S. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for respondent No. 2. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. S.S. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vivek Shukla, Advocate for respondent No. 2. 2. Mr. H.C. Pande, learned Addl. Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners Rajeev A. Masih, John A. Masih, Ms. Florance A. Masih and Km. Rachna A. Masih seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them, now, has become infructuous, as the Police, 2 after the completion of the investigation, has filed charge sheet against the petitioners before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, CLMA No. 4121 of 2006 also stands dismissed. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 01.07.2006 01.07.2006 G