S^SE,.^^-^,^-- IN THE HIOIJXORTj^ JUBICATU^ATJ^AJJPUR /• ^1^ W.P. N©, Petitioners J^97. 6 0-02 1» Krishna Naraia Agfawal^ S/o Shri Ram Narain Agrawal, (Since eleceased), thi^ygh Legal Bepreseratatives; Respondents 3- 1. 2. 3. 4. !• Gopal Agrawal, S/o Late Shri Krishna Narain Aa'rawal, 2» Murari Agravyal, S/o Late Shrt Krishna Narain Agrawal, 3» smt.MayaDeviAgrawala Widow of late Shri Krishraa Narain Agrawal, All residents of Gondpara, Btlaspur, Tehsil and DistricttBilaspur (NP), yers^s Unioa of india through Geaeral Maaager, Soath Eastern RaUway, Garciera Reach, Calcutta (West Bengal) Divisioaal Railway Manager S@yth Eastern-Railway, Bilaspur .(MP), Estate Officer^ Soath Eastern Railway cum Estate Qfficer, Uader Section 3 ©ithe Pablic Premises (Eviction @f U^aythorised Occiapants) Act, 1971, BUaspyr The District Judge Cvsm Appellate Aythorlty Under Section 9 of the Public PreiBises (Eviction of Uiiaathorised Occupants) Act, 1971» BUasptir (MP), C@ratd.,,2 '^^••'::'\:'.. 0-0.3 - 2 - PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE OONSTITUTION OF INDIA T XI-HC-22 '•^yi' t^w-si^? '^^N'^fi^ ^^ ^{^RT^^ ^twt^, t^rey 0071 :^1...&1°. e\rY- H^I^ ^I^I ^^IW ^T^^ 06-04-200S Shri Mamndra. ShrivNtava, Sn Advocate wifh Shri Ashish Gupta, counsel for thje petitioner, Shri Vinay Hadt, Sr. 4dvocate wifh Sm.t. Preeti Budhia, Shri couusel for fhc respond^ats/ Raihvays. Heaid onI.A.No.2230^2005. Learaed for fhe petiti^ner subuuts that the petitioner Knshna Narayaxi Agrawal ^xpired during pendency of fhe iastant writ petition. He pra^ The appUcation is supported] Agravyal be substifruited inj -^q^ft^ HW^S ^ fs^i ^N^R ^3?P^^I^T ^Q for substitutuig fhe petitioner^s son naoiely Gopal Agrawal 4s oi^€; of his legal reprcsentative. by an affidavit of Gopal Agrawal, 8/0 Late Krishna Narayaa Afcrawal, Aged about 46 years, R/o Gond Para, Bilaspur, jTahsil & Distdct Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). Thc prayer is uot opf|osed by lcarncd couusel for fhc respondents/ RaUways, For fhe reasons stalted m the appUcation (I.A.No. 2230/2005), the same is qdlowed. Let the naaie of Qopal tihie iastant petition as legal represcutative of petitioner Kfishiia Narayaii Agrawal. Heard. j Leamed counsel fof fhe petitioner submits fhe petitioner has jGBed an affid^vit regarduig aUotnient of plots/ shops. Paras 3, /1 aad 5 pf fhe afi&davit are relevaxit and quoted bclow ; K3. I say that, in the aforescdd meeting A^terf 7.^-.<?-??00^ which. w^s attendprd hy me ateo, a mcy? was siwwn to me anci tpf^?fers XI-HC-22 ~3^ ^TRM^, 'S^PT^, t^T^y 72 ^^&T^I f^ll^STSt^I '^W^'TrfiH ^T^T^^TW^rfN _ shift their busines^ 15-3-2005, IshaU new plot I would f can imfHjp.diately construcled I shaH new plot 5. That, I am a ^, sufferfrom 55% d\ ^N^N 'w^* ^ fe^ if^^R '^>3ri^3i?^r identifying the tocation was shown a plot '2 sq. ft. proposing other shopkeeper^ o/ ihe plots. ^ admeasuring 6^ alloiment of ihe ^ame to me. Myself and other shopkeepei^ were proposed plots acoordmg to the^ existing requirements arul all of thern (Jfyreed to ilw propoaul of the Railway Auth^rity rznd they hnve also signed ihe minut^s giving their consent to s to the altemative plots. 4. I say ihat if ih^ aliemaiwe ploi is given to me cis propos^d in the meeting dated shift my business to the ^equire fsorfie imw so ttuzt \mt^tn^ct my shjnp at th^ altemative plot anjci as «oonas my shop is shifi my business to the wndicapped person and sability." Learaed counsel for tjtie rcspondents/Railways veiy fairly submitted that (he peljitioner is being considercd for allotment of altemative plot as he is stiU occupyuig fhe plot/shop m fhe Railway St^tion circidating area, He also ^ubmits tlial liU iluializadou ^£the case of the pedtioucr for allotment of altemative plot, ^he RaUway AdmiDistration has no immediate plans for evictmg the petitioaer. E The statesaent inade by leara.ed counsel for the respondents/RaUways is i^corjded, lu vicw of tlie afoiisaid aflidavit/slaleiiiexil, Uie respondents/RaiIways is directed to decide the matter 1 ^ ^. . , .. , , J' ,rcga]^mg__a]to^e^t_of_^Jj^ra^&re_pJtot^sho£__to.i_&e. "\ • •-. -" ' [~^ tf^ ^liiSllitliilsUasrilliiS^^^S^^^^^ XI-HC-22 Y-I^^'^T 'f^NT^l^T ^?^^ ^I^^ Gowri % "S^t ^l^id<4, '^WTS, fa<niH^< oor3 W^IT^W^" l^P 52^|^ ^OTfe^?'RR^'?'fe^ T^?R ^3if??R3:iT^T petitioner as early as possib|e prcferably witfain a period of one monfh, Subject to the aforesaid jobservations aad directions the petitipn staads disposed of. Con8cquciitly, pendia^g disposed of, Certified copy as per rides after substitutiou of Gopal Agrawal as legal representativ^ ofpetitioner Krishna Nai-ayaa Agrawfil. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^ppUcations, if any, also stand [•q^^fes /'V