1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 193 0F 2008 Ashok S/o Devidasrao Mulay Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. *** Mr. S. K. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. V.D.Tele, A.G.P. for Respondent/ State. Mr. A. N. Nagargoje, Advocate i/b Mr. S. N. Kendre, Advocate for Respondent No.3. *** 1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Mr. Patil, who appears for the Petitioner, points out the prayer made in the writ petition. Second suspension order dated 7th December, 2007 has been impugned by the Petitioner. Mr. Patil submits that the petitioner now has been retired on superannuation on 30th November, 2008. In this view of the matter, according to Mr. Patil, now this petition has become infructuous. However, Petitioner is entitled for pension and retiral benefits in accordance with the provisions of law. In this view of the matter he seeks withdrawal of the petition with liberty if necessary to approach to appropriate forum seeking pension and retiral benefits. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 2. Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn being infructuous with liberty in favour of the Petitioner to approach the appropriate forum, if necessary, for pension and retiral benefits. No costs. [SHRIHARI P. DAVARE,J.] [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:19/11/2009. ans/193