IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2009 / 12TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 5917 of 2009(H) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------- 1. S.KANI, PROPRIETOR, S.K.CONSTRUCTION, ANISH VILLA, KALLIMEL P.O., MAVELIKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. K.J.DAVID, S/O.JOHN, PARIMALAMURIYIL, KADAPRA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PULIKEEZH POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, MAVELIKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 3. THE GEOLOGIST, DISTRICT OFFICE, ALAPPUZHA. 4. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 5917 OF 2009 (H) ==================== Dated this the 3rd day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T Second petitioner is the owner of a lorry bearing Regn.No.KL- 4/V.3961, which was used for transportation of ordinary clay mined by the 1st petitioner on the strength of Ext.P1 permit. It is stated that despite the legitimate mining and its transportation, the vehicle in question was seized by the 1st respondent. It is with that grievance the writ petition is filed. 2. Learned Government Pleader today on instruction confirms the seizure of the vehicle by the 1st respondent. According to him, when the vehicle was seized, the pass which the petitioners state that they have, was not produced. It is stated that in view of this, proceedings have been forwarded to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvalla. 3. Going by the submissions thus made by the leaned Government Pleader, proceedings are thus pending before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvalla. 4. In view of this, I direct that it will be open to the petitioners to produce the pass before the Revenue Divisional Officer along with a copy WPC 5917/09 :2 : of this judgment, in which case, RDO shall pass necessary final orders in this matter. Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment before the Revenue Divisional Officer for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp