IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 24966 of 2004 Between: 1 Smt. Sake Venkata Ramanamma, w/o Suryanarayana, D.No. 53-23-26, Chaitanyanagar, Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam. 2 Sri Devata Surya Satya Papa Rao, S/o D.S.M. Gupta, D.No. 48-1-19/1, Lalithanagar, Visakhapatnam, ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Cooperative Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, 2 Smt. P. Sridevi, w/o Ramakrishna, self styled President of Sri Krishna Co-operative House Building Society Ltd, Regd.No. B 1624, Visakhapatnam, 3 Sri Rani Laxmi Narasinga Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Self styled Secretary of Sri Krishna Co-operative House Building Society Ltd, Regd.No. B 1624, Visakhapatnam, 4 Smt. B. Manjula, W/o B.V. Ratnam, Self styled Director of Sri Krishna Co-operative House Building Society Ltd, Regd.No. B 1624, Visakhapatnam, 5 Sri Chenna Das, Self styled Director of Sri Krishna Co-operative House Building Society Ltd, Regd.No. B 1624, Visakhapatnam, 6 Smt. K. Kanaka Ratnavalli, D/o K.C. Naidu, Self styled Vice President of Sri Krishna Co-operative House Building Society Ltd, Regd.No. B 1624, Visakhapatnam, 7 Sri Krishna Cooperative House Building Society Ltd, Rep. by its M.D. Regd.No. B 1624, D.No. MIG 11/70, Sector - III, MVP Colony, Visakhapatnam -17. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the order passed by the 1st respondent in IA.72/2004 in OP 119/2004 dated 16-11- 2004 as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the 1st respondent to dispose of O.P.No. 119 of 2004 forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.T.NIRANJAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 7: No Appearance Counsel for the Respondents No. 2 to 6: Mr. G. Ramgopal, Caveator. The Court made the following: Oral order:- Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. No costs. The interim order dated 31-12-2004 stands dissolved. __________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dt. 20-01-2005 Pvks/* To 1 The Cooperative Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, 2.2CD copies. Form-NIC-OGS/WP{AVLR}