:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.3044 OF 2004 Khimji Teja Jitiya ..Plaintiff. Vs. Rajendra Dhaktu Pawar ..Defendant. Mr.Ramesh Jain i/b.Mr.P.I.Vakil for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 13TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED : 13TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED : 13TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : The suit is filed to recover a sum of Rs.1,68,300/- together with interest at 18% per annum on Rs.1,65,000/- from the date of the suit till payment. 2. The suit is based on a dishonoured cheque. The cheque in the sum of Rs.1,65,000/- was dishonoured when presented to the bank on 27.7.2004. There is no reply to the Plaintiff’s Advocate’s notice demanding payment dated 27.7.2004. 3. No appearance has been filed. Hence, no written statement has been filed. 4. The Plaintiff has tendered a compilation of :2: documents which are taken on record and marked Exhibit "A" Collectively. 5. There is nothing on record to militate against the Plaintiff’s claim. 6. In the circumstances, the suit is decreed as prayed. 7. Refund as per rules.