IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2899 of 2011 1. SHUKDEO ROY SON OF RUPDEO ROY. 2. SIYA RAM ROY SON OF SHUKDEO ROY. 3. PANKAJ ROY SON OF SHUKDEO ROY. 4. BIKASH MANDAL SON OF JALLO MANDAL. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 11.04.2011 Since, the petitioner no.1 (Shukdeo Roy) has already been arrested, hence, his application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous. So far as petitioner nos. 2 to 4 are concerned. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 320, 324, 506 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that both sides are on inimical terms with regard to some bona fide land dispute and from the F.I.R., itself, it appears that only bleeding injury was caused. A statement has been made in the petition that the simple injury has been caused to the informant. It is further submitted that the accusation of assault is not specific against the petitioners and the 2 petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner nos. 2 to 4, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 122/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)