IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.20731 of 2010 DULDUL SINGH @ DULDUL KUMAR SINGH, son of late Singhasan Singh Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 01.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(i)(x) of the Schedule Caste / Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities), Act as well as Section 4(16) of Bounded Labour Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation is palpably false and the allegation of causing injury subsequently has transpired against Dhanjee Singh. Learned counsel further submits that in fact, the dispute is between Dhanjee Singh and informant’s husband and petitioner has been implicated in this case, as he happens to be one of the associates of Dhanjee Singh. Learned counsel further submits that there is general allegation that all the accused persons opened fire. In the circumstances, petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. case no. 172 of 2010, with the condition that he will not physically absent for two consecutive dates, till three witnesses are examined. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)