THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.281 of 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, by the appellant in A.S.No.39 of 2009 on the file of the learned Principal District Court, Warangal. The respondent has filed O.S.No.599 of 2005 in the Court of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, for recovery of money and the said suit was decreed by judgment and decree, dated 29.08.2008. Immediately thereafter, the petitioner filed A.S.No.39 of 2009 in the Court of Principal District Judge, Warangal. At this stage, he has filed I.A.No.1307 of 2009 seeking permission to furnish additional evidence under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC, by examining the first attestor, by name, Sri T.Madhusudhan Rao, of Ex.A.1. The said I.A. was rejected by the lower appellate Court by order, 24.11.2010, which is impugned in this Civil Revision Petition. In this case, it is to be noticed that to furnish additional evidence, one should establish that notwithstanding the exercise of due diligence, such evidence was not within the knowledge so as to examine such witness. From the averments mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of I.A.No.1307 of 2009, it is evident that the petitioner has not established the requirements under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC so as to allow the petitioner to adduce additional evidence by examining the first attestor of Ex.A.1. In view of the reasons recorded by the Court below, it appears, I.A.No.1307 of 2009 was filed at the belated stage and to drag on the proceedings, as such, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 14th OCTOBER, 2011. kvni