230 DEVISION BENCH Petitioner •ION'BLE SHRI RAJEEV' SON'BLE SUNiL Kl W.P. (PILi No. 322S of 2007 J. Jaikushal Rohidas S/o Late Shri Kantha Rohidas At Post-Baloda, and District Janjyir-Champa (C.G.) RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh through Chief Secretary, Department of Home, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Shawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Coliector, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Superintendent of Police Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Inspector General of Police Distt. Biiaspur (C.G.) Ms. Sunita Jain, learned Amicus Curiae for the petitioner. Shri J.K, Gilda, learned Additionai Advocate Generai ?->r *t».^ O*"*^ ine oiyis. Shri H.B. Agrawal, learned Senior counsel with Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, !eamed counsel for Tirth Raman Agrawai and Lakhanlai Yadav, who were noticed in compliance of order dated 02-08-2007. ish March, 201 1 Z3i 'he following order of the Court was passed by )—,- J. This petltion came to be registered on the letter sent by one - Jaikushai Rohidas alleging that Tirth Raman AgrawaS and Lakhanlai Yadavwere not permitting him to feteh \s@ter from the well sltuated in Kiiasara No.3563 in Viilage — Baloda, District - Janjgir-Champa. 2. Aiong with the reply filed on behalf of Tirth Raman Agrawal and Lakhanlal Yadav, copies of the plaint filed by Tirth Raman Agrawal against Jaikushai Rohidas seeldng declarstion and permanent injunction has been filed. In the said Civii Suit the subject matter of the dispute relates to the lands bearing Khasara Nos. & 3563 situated in Village-Baloda, District - Janjgir - 4. As the dispute between Jaikushal Rohidas and Tirth Raman Agrawal is the subject matter of the Civil Suit pending before the Civil Court, we are of the opinion that no further monitoring ofthe matter in this writ petition, now, is required. 5. The writ petition, thus, stands disposed of. Sd/- Chief Justice nlmmi Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge