IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26017 of 2010 YOGESH CHANDRA S/O DINA NATH SRIVASTAVA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 30.08.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304 (B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that it has been stated in the First Information Report itself that information was given to the informant that the deceased was unwell and thereafter when he came to the house of the petitioner he saw that the dead body was prepared for funeral rites. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that these facts demonstrate that he was no ill motive on the part of the petitioner and there was no question of the murder of the deceased. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by 2 the court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Thawe P.S. Case No. 39/2010, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )