IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2008 / 29TH PHALGUNA 1929 CRP.No. 1117 of 2007() ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 08/02/2007 IN EP.60/2005 IN LAR.32/1997 of ADDL.SUB COURT,KOTTAYAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER: JUDGMENT DEBTOR: ---------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER RESPONDENTS: DECREE HOLDER ---------------------------- SAROJINIAMMA, D/O. JANAKIAMMA, ARACKAPARAMBILAYA KOTTARATHIL PARAMBIL, KATTAMPAK, NJEEZHOOR, VAIKOM. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) SRI.AJEESH K.SASI THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- C.R.P.No.1117 of 2007 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of March, 2008 ORDER This revision petition is preferred against the order of the Subordinate Judge, Kottayam in E.P.No.60/05 in LAR No.32/97. 2. The court below considered the difference in the statement and found that it was on account of the omission on the part of the State of not including the solatium of 12% additional land value from counting interest. Then appropriation has been done and deducting the tax amount, the court arrived at the figure of Rs.14,643.15. In the light of the decision in Sunder's case, the solatium also forms a part and parcel of the compensation and therefore, there is nothing to interfere with the order passed by the court below. Therefore, the C.R.P. lacks merits and dismissed. The State Government is directed to pay the amount within a period of three months from today. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE csl