IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23281 of 2009 SATISH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11/08/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel representing the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner is one of the named accused of the case. All together four persons are named as accused but allegation against the petitioner is only of causing fire arm injury upon the informant’s son Narain Kumar. Submission is that the informant’s son was taken to PMCH for treatment and bed head ticket shows that it was road traffic accident in which he was injured. After death of several days the present FIR has been lodged. Learned counsel for the informant produced the post mortem report of the deceased which mentions that the injury was caused by fire arm and the deceased was having only one ante mortem injury which is attributed to the petitioner. Though other accused persons have been admitted to bail but the case of the petitioner is not identical of them. Considering the above facts, I am not inclined 2 to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)