HAGH CGUR‘F QF éUBECATIJRE AT BELA$PUR: ¢EéHATLf§$3§RE=€ $ing!e Bench : Hon’bie SM HL. $attu, Gd. Writ Petition Na. 3E? QF 2&35 ?e%it§cmey Manbodhi, aged abeut 35 year‘s, son 0f Shri Bahoran Yadav, daily wage earner, workmg as Watermaw in the Departmeht of lrrigatiom, resident of lrrégation Coaony, JaojgiraChampa (CG) Vs. 1. State of Chhai'tisgarh through the Secretary Departmeot of Homan Resources; Dau Kaiyan Singh Bhawan‘ Raipur (Chhattisgam) 2‘ The Shier Engineer, Department of irrigation, Dau Kaiyan Singh Bhawam Raipur (CG) The Executive Engineer, Depar’rmeni of Irrigaiion, Janjgir-Champa {Chha‘rrisgarm 4. The Sub Divisiona! Officer (irrigation), Department of Irrigation, Janjgir Branch f‘n oanai a! aanjgir la Ir-iaedeo Project. Distt. Janggir— . . a (CG) Ro$gon¢ients ()A Preeerii: Shri VR. Khoeiei cauneel for i’ne aeiitioner. Shri Saniay S Agrawal, GA. forrhe respondents emxi. eeeee £§9asse€i en 22”“ March, EM} According to the petitioner, he was employed by the respondenis as dak runner right from the year 1986. The grievance made in this writ petition is that the reeponderits have not reguiarized his servicest theugh two decades have iapeed from the datehe initiaiiv joinee the respondents Therefore, he ie requesting this Court to direct the reeponoents to regularize his services as dak fUW’ier. (2) The petitiorrer, in this petition hae etateo that before approaching this Court, he'hae aiready fiied appropriate representation before the respondents and that representation hae not been considered by the _\5 z respondents inspite of tong lapse of time and, therefore‘ he is seeking appropriate directian to the respondents. {3) In my opinion, the responsibie respondente eugnt to have considered the grievances of the petitioner made in his representatian and ought to nave informed ‘nim the resuit of such consideration, Since that has not been done, a direction requires to be issued to the respondents. Accordingiy, the toiiowing : G§§§ER {t} The writ petition is disposed of. (2} A direction ie issued to the competent authority before whom tne representation said to have been iiied by the petitioner is pendéngl to consider the same and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. Ordered accordingiy. i Sdl-