st5»n« ^^iS^^S^ c^ grz? IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WJ'^NO. 6'R'^S"^ /2006 PETITIONER oy>^\¥ /}^^y /•c.^y ./.•^' Shankar Patail, S/o. Shri Shobhu >•'*°•<' Y .••"" Patail, aged about 60 years, R/o. Sheorinarayan, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) ^v%v .•s-f. ^^'/ .[^'~ -I?" ..•'" RES^6;BriS^<TS .-•^' .^ r^^ VERSUS ^,: State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 'v^ / {°•} ••^" E'^^ ,2: Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Janjgir Division, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) c WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRn- ML THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER HIW COURT OF CHHATTIS&ARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PETmON (S.) N0.6975 OF 2006 Petitioner Respondents versus Shankar Patail State of Chhattisgarh and ano-ther Present : Mr. Sunil Otwani, cowisel for •the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jam, Pcnel Lanwyer for •the State/respondents. SuUMsh OR C> E R (Passed on this 9th cby of Jonuary, 2007) 1. Leamed counset cppearing for the petitioner as well as leamed Ponel Lawyer q)pearing for the Storte/respondents jomtly submit that -the facts of -the present writ petition cre similar to that of in Writ Petition No. 108/2005 (Suvmd vs. Starte Chhattisgarh & others), which tws albwed vide order ckited 4.01.2007. They furttier submit that the question of hw involved is also •the same. 2. In view of -the above-stuted submisshnis made by leamed counset for -the port'ies, this petition is alloNied in terms of the order dated 4.01.2007 passed by this Cwrt m Writ Petition No. 108/2005 (fiovmd vs. State Chhatt-isgarh A o-thers). The re^»ondents/Stateare at liberty to examine the faets of the case individually. No order os to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge