(^^ •^v" HIGH COURT prCHHATTISGARH. BIIASPUR W.Pffit No. 7450 of2(X)7 PETITIONER (.- Ram Das Janghe1,s/o l^ate Shri .Jhumiik Das, aged about 61 years, Head Master, Govt, Prunaiy School, Duinardihkala, Block & Tahsil Rajnaiidgaon (C.G), r/o Gram Dhaurabhata, Post Khaprikfaurd, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G). Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhatdsgarh, tfarough fhe Secretary, School Educatioa Department, Maatralaya, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.). %. The Board of Secondary Ediication, Chhatdsgarh, fhrough its Secretary, Pensionbada, Raipur, Tahsffl & District Raipur (C.G). 3. The District Educatiou Officer, District Rajnandgaon (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITinOll OF INDIA Shri Rakesh Anthoni, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, P.L. appears for the State/ responnlents on advauce copy ORAL ORDESR (17.12.2007) SUBIL KUMAR 8INHA. J. Heard finalty wifh the consent ofparties. l-canied counsel for the petitioner a^ues that the correct date ofbirfhofthe petitioner is 07.2.1947 wherp-as it bas wrongly toeen nientioned in his service records as 07.2.1946. He siibinits that in this regard many representations were given and the last. representation dated 18.2.2006 has been given to the conccmed autliorily, but no action has been taken in respect of correction of fhe date of birth of tlie petitioner. He sixbtaits tliat for the tinac being this petition inay be disposed of with a direction to thc __...-,-\---- ^%^^: W.P.(SWo:7450/2007 petitioner to file a detailed representation along-with rfilevant dociiments before the concemed authority and the coiicemed aiithority inay be directed to dispose ofttic said represe.ntation at fhe eariiest. This Timited prayer inade by learaed counsd for the petitioner is not opposed by leamed St.ate Couiisel. It is directed that. if so advised, the petitioner may fflc a detailed representatioTi along-witti a copy of tlus order and a copy of this writ petition as also tlie docutnents annexed thcreto within a period 3 weeks froni today and if such a repFRSRntatfon is filedj fhe concemed authorily shall dispose of the said repTRsentation at ttie earliest so tliat fhe contToversy raiserl by the petitioTier naay come to aa end, at least before the date ofhis superannnation. With the aforesaid observation, t1iis petitioo stanris fJTiially disposed of. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Rao