IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.25184 of 2011 1. Rinku Yadav @ Ranveer Krishna S/O Nageshwar Yadav Resident Of Village-Panjarkatta, P.S. Narpatganj, District-Araria. ---------- Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar -----Opposite Party ******* With Criminal Miscellaneous No.30071 of 2011 1. Tipu Yadav @ Medni Krishna, son of Shivnandan Yadav, resident of village – Khairbanna, P.S. – Narpatganj, District -.Araria. 2. Dabbu Yadav @ Kelwal Krishna, son of Nageshwar Yadav, resident of village – Khairbanna, P.S. – Narpatganj, District - Araria. --------- Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar -----Opposite Party ****** With Criminal Miscellaneous No.34065 of 2011 Shambhu Singh S/O Bhagwan Singh R/O Prem Nagar Madhura, Police Station - Narpatganj in The District Of Araria. ---------Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar -------Opposite Party ****** With Criminal Miscellaneous No.35767 of 2011 1. Hira Lal Yadav S/O Late Sabju Lal Yadav R/O Village - Fatehpur, Jharkaha, P.S. Narpatganj, Distt. – Araria. 2. Mahanand Yadav S/O Krityanand Yadav R/O Village - Fatehpur, Jharkaha, P.S. Narpatganj, Distt. – Araria. --------- Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ------Opposite Party ******* with Criminal Miscellaneous No.35769 of 2011 1. Baleshwar Yadav S/O Late Sabuj Lal Yadav R/O Village - Fatehpur, Jharkaha, P.S. Narpatganj, Distt. – Araria. --------- Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ------Opposite Party ******* (In Cr. Misc. No. 35767/2011) For the petitioner : Mr. Raj Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Braj Kishore Prasad, APP (In Cr. Misc. No. 35769/2011) For the petitioner : Mr. Raj Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ******** 03. 18.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 102/2011 for offences under Sections 302/120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, are named accused in this case of killing of young son of the informant after compelling to call him from outside the State just on suspicion that he had some role in missing of young daughter of one of the petitioners Baleshwar Yadav. The victim on arrival under compulsion also lodged an informatory application before S.D.J.M., Forbeesganj, stating some apprehension against some of the petitioners. Submission is that the deceased committed suicide and there is no material to show the involvement of either of the petitioners. Though one of the named accused Dhirendra Yadav released after brief detention made extra judicial confession as mentioned in paragraph 68 of the case diary. Taking into consideration that daughter of the petitioner is still missing and suspicion was raised against the victim who was called under compelling circumstances by his father, the informant himself and the detailed narration in First Information Report, none of the petitioners appear entitled for the privilege sought. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is hereby refused. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)