B'ii ^,1 <e IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREAT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0.-^f(r9 /2006 PETITIONER RR.No., Presente'" (fat"ti.....,>. /^ -^144-f-^y RESPONDENT ^fffft ,^-^ :^ ^''s^ >.» ^.-•y ^" MurlidharVerma / S/o Late Shri Kheduram Verma Age about 41 years, Asstt. Teacher Govt. MiddleSchool, Kewtara Block-Tilda, Distt- Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. StateGovt-ofChhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) 2. District Education Officer i: Raipur(C.G.) 3. Block EducationOfficer Block-Tilda, Disstt.-Raipur(C.G.) •^t' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (r XI-HC-78 tm-r'CTTa^i^ 3sr rf<i<)ici<<, BTflu'ie, fsidiuy TT^-.^.-f.."11f?/.'?.& W1[ 200 3TT^?Tira^T ('^3^Er) 3n?^T?iT)^IW craT9TI^TshK -N u &^ <. .•'- t •Roshan .^ 5Tc[Tw:^cr3n^T 11.8.2008:- Heard Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. The case of the petitioner is th; per the Instructions dated 24-12-98 Teaohers who have passed B.T.1., expenses after 22-10-64 are entittec Government is Annexure-P/1. The own oost in the year 1996 and a cert petitioner has not been given the ben| been granted two advance incremenl coun. Having heard tearned couns^ and circumstanoes of ttle oase, witho! case, the petitioner js allowed to mak^ this petition raising all her grievancel days from today and in tum, responc] the petitioner in the light of averment^ the representation also. If respondent| situated persons have been granted the petitioner's case is also covered basis of Government's order, then to | •today, in accordance with law. With the direction aforesaid, th] Parties are entitled for certifiedl °tii<<Ifi<fl-i iiicii tf te^t <Ri<^i< ^srf^ffl'sn^r cjsunsel for the petitioner. A|jv. for the State on advance copy. ^t he is working as Assistant Teaoher and as [issued by the State of M.P. the Assistant C.Ed. and M.Ed. examination on their own for two advance increments and order of p^titioner passed the B.Ed examination on his :|Roate to that effect is Annexure-P/3, but the i^fit whereas, similariy situated persons have ts under the orders of the Tribunal and this for the parties, having regard to the facts jjt expressing any opinion of the merit of the a detailed representation along with copy of ^ to respondent No.2 within a period of 15 ncjent No.2 is directed to examine the case of |made by the petitioner in this petition and in |No.2 reaohes to the conclusion that similarly Ithe benefit of two adwance increments and |'or grant of two advanoe increments on the |)ass orders within a period of 3 months from 3 petition stands disposed of. oopy of this order. L.< Sd/- 3udge P.T.O. \y