IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN THURSDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2009 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(Crl.).No. 119 of 2009(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- SADHICK.K.A., AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.M.K.ABDUL REHMAN, MUKKNIPARAMBIL, SAINA MANZIL, KAMPIVELLIKKAKAM, KAKKANAD WEST-P.O., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. MR.B.RAMAN PILLAI MR.R.ANIL RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM. 2. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM. 3. THANKAPPAN, ASARIPARAMBIL, PAZHAMTHOTTAM P.O., PUNOORKODE, ERNAKULAM. 4. MANU PRASAD, S/O.THANKAPPAN, ASARIPARAMBIL, PAZHAMTHOTTAM P.O., PUNOORKODE, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. S. U. NAZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(Crl.) 119 OF 2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT. P1 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY, PADAMUGAL MAHALLU MUSLIM JAMA- ATH, DATED 15.3.09 EXT. P2 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE FIR & FIS IN CRIME NO. 478/09 OF THE ERNAKULAM TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION DATED 14.3.2009 EXT. P3 : THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA, KUMARAPURAM BRANCH, DATED 16.3.2009 /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE A. K. BASHEER & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P. (Crl.) No. 119 of 2009 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 19th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT Basheer, J: Ms. Jumi, the alleged detenu is present in the court along with her parents. Petitioner, the husband of Ms. Jumi is also present. 2. We have interacted with the parties. Learned Government Pleader submits that the detenu had appeared before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class I, Ernakulam, on 18.3.2009 and after recording her statement the learned Magistrate had allowed her to go with her parents. 3. The detenu stated before us that she intends to go with her parents. She further asserted that she does not want to live with her husband. She vehementally denied the allegation that she was under any kind of illegal detention or confinement. 4. In the above facts and circumstances, the detenu is allowed to go with her parents. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE kmd.