HON’BLE SHRI G.S.SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.839 OF 2007 Between: Mangalagiri Komali @ Sudarsana Komali . . .Appellant AND State of Andhra Pradesh and others . . .Respondents :: JUDGMENT :: Counsel for the appellant : Shri D.V.Sitharam Murthy Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Government Pleader for Revenue 8th October, 2007 PER G.S.SINGHVI, CJ This appeal is directed against order dated 12.07.2007 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.3219 of 2007 whereby he declined to interfere with show cause notice dated 19.12.2006 issued by District Collector, Visakhapatnam for cancellation of the assignment of land made to the appellant, but gave liberty to her to raise objections against the proposed action. After hearing Shri D.V.Sitharam Murthy for some time, we indicated to him that the Court is not inclined to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge who, as mentioned above, refused to quash the show cause notice and gave liberty to the appellant to file reply with a direction to the officer concerned to pass appropriate order after hearing her. There upon, Shri D.V.Sitharam Murthy made a request for permission to his client to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file objections/explanation to the show cause notice within a period of two weeks from today. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue says that he does not have any objection, if the time specified in the order under challenge is extended by two weeks. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed. However, two weeks further time is allowed to enable the appellant to file her explanation to show cause notice dated 19.12.2006. The remaining direction given by the learned Single Judge in the matter of hearing the appellant and passing of appropriate order shall remain operative and be given effect after two weeks counted from today. G.S.SINGHVI, CJ 8th October, 2007 C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J kvni