BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(,<’). No. u u H 0/2009 PETITIONER Rajkishore Kashyap, aged about 36 years, son of Shri Brijmohan Kashyap, resident of Dugdugiya (Baigabasti), Post Kunkuri, Tah. Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpuf (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Dau KaTyan Singh‘ Bhawan, Raipur (CG) /2. Collector, Distt. Jashpur (CG) Ziia /3. Chief Executive Officer, panchayat — Jashpur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR . WRIT PETITION (S) NO.4440 OF 2009 Rajkishore Kashyap Versus State of Qhhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticl‘e 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish Kt Agnihotri, J. Present :— Shri Arun Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate for the respondent No.3. RESPONDENTS ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 5t“ day'of May, 201 1 ) 1. By this petition. the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to conduct counseling afresh by affording full opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and grant appointment, thereon. 2. On the basis para 5 ofthe return, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the counseling had already been conducted by giving proper intimation to the candidates including the petitioner, but the petitioner had not appeared in the said counseling. Learned counsel further submits‘that'after completion of selection process, the appointments haveéalso been made. Thus, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication and the petition has become infructuous. i Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructus. x l ,, I, Sd/— t Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ' l Gowri assw. uo