IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28747 of 2011 Ainul Mian @ Md.Ainul, son of Ali Hussain Mian Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3. 22.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by orders dated 6.1.2010 and 31.8.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. 45056 of 2009 and 25248 of 2010 respectively. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail on the ground of delay in trial. A report was called for from the Trial Court which reveals that the trial is at the fag end. Since only the Investigating Officer was to be examined on 1.12.2011 in all probability the Investigating Officer must have been examined now. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to review the earlier orders. The prayer for bail is once again rejected. The Trial Court (Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur,) is directed to send the particulars of the Investigating Officer if he has not appeared, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 43 of 2010 arising out of Pear P.S. Case No. 63 of 2009, to the Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur along with a copy of this order, and the Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur, is directed to ensure production of the witness on the date so fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further delay in trial. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)