IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 166 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 166 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 166 OF 2006 IN IN IN REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 2391 OF 2006 PETITION (ST) NO. 2391 OF 2006 PETITION (ST) NO. 2391 OF 2006 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.325 OF 1989 APPEAL NO.325 OF 1989 APPEAL NO.325 OF 1989 Sakharam Laxman Mathane ... Applicants & ors. V/s. Laxman Bahiru Dige & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.Uday Warunjikar for the applicants. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 19th December, 2006 : 19th December, 2006 : 19th December, 2006 P.C. . Heard. Considering the averments the Civil Application for condonation of delay is allowed. 2. Present review petition is against the order dated 22nd December, 2005 in the Second Appeal in question. After considering the rival contentions raised by the parties, by a reasoned order the Second Appeal was dismissed. There is no case made out to interfere with the said order of dismissal. There is no error on the face of record, which is sufficient to entertain the said review petition. 3. Considering all these into account the review petition is dismissed. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]