IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6413 of 2011 VINOD KUMAR MISHRA @ VINOD SHANKAR MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, complainant and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498(A) of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the D. P. Act. The accusation is that the petitioner has performed second marriage. The petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 1200/- per month to the complainant from April,2011 by depositing the same in the second week of every month in the account of the complainant. Learned counsel for the complainant agrees to supply the account number of the complainant within ten days from today to the learned counsel for the petitioner. The aforesaid payment will be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial or maintenance proceedings. Considering the aforesaid stand of 2 the parties, let the petitioner above named be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 219 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Rohtas at Sasaram, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. If the petitioner will not deposit the alleged amount in the account of the complainant then the complainant will be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)