IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2007 / 22ND ASHADHA 1929 RP.No. 665 of 2007(K) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.20053/2007 Dated 29/06/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER ----------------- BAJAJ ELECTRICALS LTD., BAJAJ HOUSE, POWER HOUSE ROAD, KOCHI-18 REP. BY ITS BRANCH SALES SUPPORT MANAGER. BY ADV. SRI.R.KRISHNA RAJ RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. GEORGE THOMAS, OLASSAYIL, POWER HOUSE ROAD, KOCHI-18. 2. LINCY THOMAS, OLASSAYIL, POWER HOUSE ROAD, KOCHI-18. 3. MARY KUTTY THOMAS, OLASSAYIL, POWER HOUSE ROAD, KOACHI-18. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/7/2007 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J ===================== R.P.No.665/2007 in W.P.(C)No.20053 OF 2007 ===================== Dated this the 13th day of July, 2007 O R D E R Though strictly a review application is not maintainable, the grievance is that the party has not been supplied still with a copy of the order. If it is true, there is non-compliance of the direction of this court. Therefore the Sub Court, Ernakulam may report why it was not in a position to issue the copy of the order as directed by this court. The order was given by this court only to enable the party to get appropriate relief from the appropriate forum. Since it is submitted that the copies are not yet received, I am inclined to extend the direction given by me to stop the issuance of a cheque for a further period of two weeks. The learned Sub Judge shall send his report within a period of 10 days from today. R.P. is disposed of accordingly. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE Cdp/-