c'; IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition fsl No. 2r?3' of 2006 PETITIONER: S.K. Ravi, S/o Shri Sheo Bhajan Ram, Aged about 47 years, S.D.0., Rural Engineering Services, Sub-Division, Lundra District: Surguja, Chhattisgarh. - Versus - RESPONDENTS: ^^ '^••"" ^ ^'jeo^^" &c"'':¥^^^ .,.x'<^ &- cu&^10 .- .-.Si'U^ Q.'i.~ll^ ,i.J & ^?- 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Services, < Division -2 , Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Janpad Panchayat, Baikunthpur, Through Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Baikunthpur, District Koriya, (Chhattisgarh) 4. S.S. Toppo, Sub Divisional Officer, Rural Engineering . Services, Sub-Division, Baikunthpur, District Koriya, (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CQNSTrTUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE_QF APPRQPRIATE WRIT/WRITS, DIRECTIONS ETC.._IN_THE NATURE_OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ;:.-"-- XI-HC-78 *fi^cn ai<iiqi s^'^nq^pr^ g^pTg^ Ricii.y^ » U^ * V -L ^r 200^ CT^r'ra^? (^q^g^sr) sn^r^Ttera; trar 3n^T g>i[N; ?:RITWBf?a'3I1^T 1-7- coUnsel Mr. Sanjay K. Agrcwoii, ,r. Vinay Pandey, Panel L4 & 2, on ddvance copy. Heard. By ths instcnt writ petit trcmsfer order dated 30-6-20061 No.l, whereby he has been to Janpad Pcsnchoyat: Baikynthpu| The main 9round of ch4 petitioner has been shown to hai therefore, he is not entitied for Learned counsel for the t has never made any request tnansferred on wrong ground. pstitioner' may be aiiowed to No.l to w'nich learned counsel No.l & 2 has no objection. i-!aving hesrd iearned couf the facts and circumstances ofl opinion on merit of the casa, th^ the petitioner Is just, fair and ^rafeifrT wr?ff ir'te^t • ^srl^iTsn^r for the petitioner. for the Stats/respondents No. on, the petitioner has chailenged his (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent tran^ferred from Lundra, District; Surguja Sf, District: Koriya. !len9® of the transfer 's that the )?e transferred on his own request tmd p+ie transportation aliowance. istitioner submits that 1+ie petitioner Ifor his traisfer and he has been He requested that 1+ierefore, the ifiake a repressntation to i-espondent ^ippearing for the State/respondents ^isei for the parties, having regard to the ccse and witiiout expressing any request made by iearned counsel for teasonabie. Ther'efore, the pe+itioner P.T.O. Cf ^ XI-HC-78 snSRTwR-iitb cTsn'sn^T^icb ^^ Somc f' <4° *fl^dTSh*)|ch 3^'::W(RW, BTlltl'IS, Rlflltiy ..^^.^^-^/^ -,.. / ^ 200 3T7^?T4ach (^cti^sl^ET) ?T(TIWHf?tT3n^T 2. ispon<^nt is ciiowed to make a detailed r4 annexing a copy of the writ p^" days from'; today csid respondp representation within one mont^i considering the points raised manner, on sts own n'.erifs, representation of the petitione of the order impugned in re^; stayed. With the directions aforel Consequentiy, M.(W.)P.Nol Parties are entitied for ce|i +i'iir<?i41-f ^it<ciTfftecA<f«iwi< ^a-rf^iTsn^T • [prese'itation raising all his grieycmces p4tition to respondent No.l within ten No.l is directed to decide the from the date of its receipt after by the petitioner, in an objectiye lin accordance with law. Till the is decided, the effect and operation fpect of the petitione?' shail rewain i^aid, the petition stands disposed of. 12774/2006 also stands dispossd of. •tified CODV of this order. ' Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.