IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17645 of 2009 1. SHUKDEO RAJAK S/O JOGI RAJAK R/O MOHALLA- LINE DHOBIPATTI, WARD NO.-12, P.S. & DISTT.- KISHANGANJ Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. COMMANDANT, S.S.B., 21, KISHANGANJ, BIHAR 3. POLICE DIRECTOR GENERAL, S.S.B., NEW BAILY ROAD, DANAPUR, PATNA 4. POLICE DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL, S.S.B., BARAUNI 5. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KISHANGANJ 6. CIVIL SURGEON CUM CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, KISHANGANJ 7. HOME MINISTRY, S.S.B., GOVT. OF INDIA, 21, KISHANGANJ, BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.2.2010 Faced with the predicament of a challenge made in the year, 2009 for alleged denial of appointment under an advertisement of 2005, counsel submits that the petitioner has approached the respondents authority on 4.7.2009 vide Annexure-7 and directions may be given to dispose the same. If a representation has been filed, it lies in the wisdom of the respondents to consider the same. In so far as the writ Court is concerned, it is not satisfied that any orders on such representation shall constitute a fresh cause of action in view of the discussion contained in (2008)10 SCC 115. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)