IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH JANUARY 2010 / 7TH MAGHA 1931 WP(Crl.).No. 16 of 2010(S) ---------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- V.U.RAJIV, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.V.N.UNNIKRISHNAN, VATTEKKATTUVALAPPIL HOUSE, VARADIOM DESOM, AVANNUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.N.PADMAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, PERAMANGLAM, THRISSUR. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR. 3. K.S.KOLANDAVELU SWAMY @ SENTHIL, 95-SAKTHI BUILDING, OPPOSITE SAKTHI HOSPITAL, KAMARAJA STREET, GOBICHETTIPALAYAM, ERODE DISTRICT, TAMILNADU. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI P.N. SUKUMARAN R3 BY ADV. SMT.R.PADMAKUMARI THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(CRL).NO. 16 OF 2010 S PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE PETITIONER AND HIS WIFE DATED 07.10.2009. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE PETITIONER'S MARRIAGE. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // PS to Judge K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- W.P(CRL). NO. 16 OF 2010 S --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th January, 2010 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus commanding the respondents to produce forthwith the wife of the petitioner, who is the daughter of the third respondent by name K. Aarthi, the detenu, before this Court. Briefly put, the case of the petitioner is as follows: Petitioner married Aarthy, who is the daughter of the third respondent. It is stated that they were in love for the last two years. Ext.P1 is the Affidavit sworn to by the petitioner and his wife. Ext.P2 is the photograph of the petitioner's marriage. It is further stated, inter alia, that his wife is under illegal custody and the third respondent is not permitting him to meet his wife. 2. Today, the alleged detenu was present. We interacted with her. She told us that she is not under any illegal detention. She is aged nineteen. In such circumstances, we do not see any WP(CRL).NO.16 OF 2010 S 2 need to permit the petitioner to pursue with this Writ Petition. The Writ Petition fails and it is dismissed. This will be without prejudice to the rights of the parties available in law. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge