IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31321 of 2011 Date of Decision 16.11.2011 Sarbati Devi --Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Bipan Ghai,Sr.Advocate, with Ms.Anju S.Kaushik,Advocate, for the petitioner Mr.Vikas Malik,AAG, Haryana. Mr.Surajmal Kundu,Advocate, for the complainant RAKESH KUMAR JAIN,J: (Oral) This is a petition for bail pending trial in a case registered vide FIR No.222 dated 21.11.2010, under Sections 302,201,120-B,498-A & 406 of the IPC at Police Station Chandimandir, District Panchkula. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has been charged under Sections 120-B,201,498-A and 406 IPC. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused Jai Pal (father-in-law) had applied for regular bail vide CRM-M-18388 of 2011 which has been allowed by this Court on 30.9.2011. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent/State has opposed the bail application on the ground that even if the charge is framed, as stated above, but the petititioner is the main culprit. CRM-M-31321 of 2011 -2- After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the parity but without making any observation on the merit, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. 16.11.2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) rr JUDGE