IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.260 of 2007 AJIT KUMAR YADAV @ AJIT YADAV, Son of Late Jagdish Prasad Yadav, resident of Village- Basua ,Post-Piparpainti, P.S.Pasraha( Gogri) District-Khagaria, Pargana –Parkiya ---- Plaintiff/ Appellant Versus 1. DR.ABHAY KUMAR @ MUNNA S/o Late Jagdish Prasad Yadav, r/o Flate No.402, Duples, Govind Tower, Karihar Singh Road,Morhavadi And P.O. Ranchi, District- Ranchi(Jharkhand) 2. Alok Kumar @ Chunna. s/o Jagdish Prasad Yadav, r/o M.G. Road, Gulshan Bhawan, Pratapgarh, District-Chittorgarh( Rajasthan) ----------- Defendants/Respondents WITH M.A.No.265 OF 2007 AJIT KUMAR YADAV @ AJIT YADAV, Son of Late Jagdish Prasad Yadav, resident of Village- Basua ,Post-Piparpainti, P.S.Pasraha( Gogri) District-Khagaria, Pargana –Parkiya ---- Plaintiff/ Appellant Versus 1. DR.ABHAY KUMAR @ MUNNA S/o Late Jagdish Prasad Yadav, r/o Flate No.402, Duples, Govind Tower, Karihar Singh Road,Morhavadi And P.O. Ranchi, District- Ranchi(Jharkhand) 2. Alok Kumar @ Chunna. s/o Jagdish Prasad Yadav, r/o M.G. Road, Gulshan Bhawan, Pratapgarh, District-Chittorgarh( Rajasthan) ----------- Defendants/Respondents ----------- 11 23-03-2009 Heard Mr.Manish Jha, learned counsel for the appellants and Mrs.Arpana Kumari , learned counsel for the Respondent nos.1 and 2. Both these appeals which arise out of the common order dated 5.6.2007 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge-I, Khagaria in Title Suit No.54 of 2005 have been taken up together and are being disposed of by this common order. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants in both the cases that during the pendency of these appeals before this Court, the parties to the litigation resolved and entered into a compromise amongst themselves and in view of the compounding of their disputes and - 2 - differences a joint compromise petition was filed in the court below and in pursuance thereof the court below has disposed of the Title Suit in terms of the compromise by order dated 23.1.2009. Learned counsel for Respondent nos.1 and 2 in both the cases admits the fact that both the parties have settled all their disputes and differences by way of compromise and the court below has disposed of the case in terms of the compromise. Since all the disputes and differences giving rise to Title Suit No.54 of 2005 have been amicably settled by way of compromise, the learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw these appeals, as no gainful purpose would be served in keeping these appeals pending. Both the appeals are, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties and the disposal by the lower appellate court. NKS/- (Abhijit Sinha, J.)