BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH AT BILASPUR [c G 1 WRIT PETITION No. 751g: 12006 PETITIONER / Jeedhan Patel, aged about 35 years, son of Shri “6a %\ 6 .Iuunn'“ Ghanshyam Patel, resident N0“ M )o; Wb °f Ban‘i - J pan, Tah. and Distt. Preacn‘edhvg“ 7.$ 1 arh (C-G.’ damn ESPONDENTS r g v 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through —- the Secretary, Secretaly Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur (C.G.) Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh Bilaspur, through — its President, Bilaspur. Collector, Distt. Raigarh (Chhatu'sgarh) a; 4_ _ Sub Divisional O$cer (Rev) Raigarh, Distt- Raigal'h (CG) ‘WRIT NR PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 2§7 OF THE , M CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. e .e ._\.V~_.,‘.‘..v»“e ‘iw. ,, IWAA u” ,., VI. v; R 6 WGE £QL§RT 8F £HHA?TISGARH #1" BRA$FUR Single swim: i-ian‘hm $hri dumim ?£a5hant éKgmar wghm Writ ¥’a"£i%ia% NaJQi’i i! 209$ FETiTiONER Jeedhaa Pate! Versus RESPGNBENYE 8m Amit Shanna, munmi far the Qatiiianer. Shri Su$hil Duhey, 6W1. Advocake far the State. WRRT PE?W§0N UNDER AR¥ICLE 22? $3: '§‘i~§E €$NSTWUT§6H¥1 '53F MDIA Tm Si‘me {n‘ £hhattisgam amd mmm. 9R£LQRBER {1233.2Q’w} The pefEtiener harem $3 chaliengmg the mrcier pas'Sed by the Ecard 9f Revenue {annexare RS5} wha has canfirmaa‘ me was? pass'sad hy me QWkesmr m axereise af pawer unde! Sweatim 2475?} and ’24:?(8) 9f the i3hhat€i3gam Lam Rayenua awe, 1?:59 {heyeina‘Eter :efea’ac! to ‘the Cade‘)‘ {2} The subiest iand makings t9 tvibal's GmiaE and Aiwa Wm haye ,m been granteé iease a? Ehe aubjersk iand by me $tate Govemmgai Qt“; 25—Q4—2%0‘i the SDI) akmg with ma Tahaiidar, Rewrme msgemor ané f’atwari made spot inspectkm and §wn€i that me Wmmmr being if? pos'aessian a? ma whim! mad ha5 amen Megauy mrwmg' gm ‘Eha busiwess 9f Erhti manufagtimng by mega! ax‘tractian 6f ma mimi’ minerai. Five 33w bmm ware faund maraufaGturaé aw gataakgd #313 km spat. inmmatkjna were saught mm tkw Janpaé Fanchayai w a “ Was infarmed the amhmity! that m £i3an$e m‘ parmiwion hang ”3%“: \kgyantes‘i my extractmrg m mammadmrw {3? bmkg. The Swiesé‘ar E x/ thareafier pawed ma emEr (Annexwe 9%} gm 25~§Q—200% §mpc$§5g €me of R$. $Q,§){}OJ- and mafimatmg brickS mum an the 5pm, aemiw was seized by the authori‘tie5 an, km date m inspeatian. I (3} it gas; been ubsewed by the Gaileatm that aftar submi$$§cn 5:: {eporé 6f 8.3‘0‘ wpamte mpod mam me Miming kwpectar wa5 am: caned fhr and $lrzei‘eafter Shaw cause natice wa5 Lawed £0 the pet§tiane: whish was qiuw mpfled by him m3 13~£6=20GL Aftéar cansiclermg me Eeply, ma amer Annexara W3 :xas been pa$sed ihak the petitiomr ha$ been mam t9 Isa in pos3essskm 9f iand baienging i5 tha triba§$ whmh has; been basaed ave! tn them far aultivatmn but we petiiiamer was naming on br‘mka manufacturing on the iam} aim mat ma wEthwt abtaining permissiitm requirsii under me FeleVant grovisien 9f iaw. {4): Qrder passed by the {idleatm’ has been canfwmed by ihe Baard 6f Revenua in it$ erder Annexure FI5. Counsei §nr me gemimm' submitS mat kha prwadwe gantained {maer Rme 53 3 ‘cha €hhatt§3gam Mina: Minara‘ Rmes E§9$ §‘xa5 mt beer} faitaww an” ’Ehé:$ wpsrwmties m iead eaiidence am exgmmmg the wmwaEs hg‘v‘a firs-i r ‘ ' been pmvideé. (5} m pamzsal 9f me gapera ammxaé with me writ petitém, ii wwEd apgear mat me petit‘mnaf was €ound £0 carry an khe Mai: manufactruirmg m me spek and mereamte: shew cauw aetica waS §ssued t0 him Refarrmg m the aifidaviig mac} a: inks, $auré a“ 1 l {Annexme W2) caneatimw Learned caunsei €ur we pLatitEaner wbmim khat autheritiea iwave igrmfez‘i affmaviw white passmg we amar agafng § him. The aféwayits of tGUdaL Atwa and Trivani Bai #ewe been ’swamrw ‘K 1 an 11—w—2Gm ans! 1340—28m w$pective¥y The gmlec’sm Qa$$ed the Q) ardm m1 25—Q§*2Qm tharefme §% appeara ikm 3m af§ic£avit ha$ ham I isreparea‘a wbsequent m me 9mg; a? kmpusimg mnaity and aaMamtmn pa$sed by the £al!ast0¥. Fmm me owe! pagsed by the Emmi ,9? aavenue aim it dae$ mt appear mat the affidavm wage submittad hafare the Beard cf Revenua. ‘Eha gméiaws haw balm :mtarEwd befare Me Nciary public and it is mi: mantiweé in me affidmit mat €h$ dapananE have swgared fa: the pumese w mumming &€f:davit iaeffom me Beard af’Raxremse. Thus §t §§ ¥a£md mat me 3aid affidavitaa hava been wbmmw Em the §1§$t izEme hafme ihi$ {mart én W§t g)!ac&3$a1mg$ which cannot m wnsidewé. Dbjem'mn :egarding mn-absewe §§ ‘h'e m1%$ mntained in Rule 53 {2? me ahhattisgam Minm Miaa’a %ué@$, 199$ have m} wbstanse magmum w me £3G¥£eatar has axerciged ma powars under Sectmn 24?{7} and 24?{8} 9f ihe {Enhawsgam Lyd Revenue Gade. Mara wefemma m the. Mimi Mineral Rulas ww§$ wt maiw me amer as. if it has been :tmweej by the aimlegtm L§F§<1$e¥ tha Mimr Mnemi gwes, 199$. The {mi page M ’ihe arda? passe€é by %hé (:sliegtm itsaf stata$ that mw ms baan regiSterw umsar Sectim 2%? '7 {3f the Chhatftsgarh haw Raverme {Zade and m‘éiczass have bega £sawd t9 me petitianer. Qperam'e gari {if $9 arder abs; $ays that {keriakty §$ §mpQSed amiar Semim 24? (3% and m’der a? sanfiaaatmn %;~3 3:}assged :méar 3e§t§un 24?{8} sf me ahmmwarh iand Révanue £36m. Thw ma Callactm‘ having n5! axemiaeé any pawei undm Mina: Minera§$ N /A\ v» .. . Raies 1996, me canteniEon af thE pamaner regaréing me véala§w 2‘ Rule 53 is 3am?» sub3tance. 1 1 \ r ’ 1 1 \ l \{6} E¥en sthemisae me ‘ainrimgs mgard‘mg m&nu€actmr§ng af bfisk $dLgring mspecifian i$ para find‘mg 3f fag?“ The pet'ktiméew %s twmg is; mm}; 1' me $aid fiading by whmittmg affidaviéa Such dispmted que'stien earmat bg examiined in a mtit’ian isnder Amme 22? a? ‘éhe Cmgtimtkm Cé mdia. (7) Amardingly: ihe patiimn fa‘kka am %$ hewby dismisseci. ‘ Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge F / z ,