IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2207 of 2011 INDRADEO SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 85 of 2010 registered under Sections 25(1-)A,26/35 of the Arms Act. Two country made loaded pistol were recovered from the roof of the petitioner and one arm was also recovered from the seat of the Motor Cycle. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that seizure has been made from the joint family house of the petitioner and the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence. Moreover, the seizure list witnesses have not supported the seizure. The aforesaid contention can be a good ground for grant of regular bail. Let the petitioner surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today when the learned court below will consider the aforesaid contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. - 2 - With this observation, this application is disposed off. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)