IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 4566 of 2000 Date of Decision: 11.8.2009 Harjit Singh ....Petitioner. Versus Hardev Kaur and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate for Ms. Lisa Gill, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. G.S. Sidhu, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this revision petition, the defendant-petitioner has challenged the order dated 5.2.2000 passed by the trial court whereby an application filed by the defendants under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of the plaint was dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has received verbal instructions from his client that the suit out of which the instant revision has arisen has since been dismissed by the trial court and, therefore, the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such. He further states that since no written confirmation of the aforesaid fact has been received, liberty be granted to the petitioner to move an application for revival of C.R. No. 4566 of 2000 -2- the revision petition in case verbal instructions received are found to be incorrect. In view of the above, the present revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. It shall, however, be open to the counsel for the defendant-petitioner to move an application for revival of the revision petition in case the verbal instructions received are found to be incorrect. August 11, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE