MCC No. 696/2012 in WPMS No. 2125/2009 Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Mr. M.S. Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for the respondent- review petitioner. Heard on review application No. 696/2012. The review application has been moved to recall the order dated 19-6-2012 passed by this court in the present writ petition, on the ground that the order passed U/S 16-A of Uttarakhand Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 is not appealable. I have perused the order passed by this Court. This court has dismissed the writ petition on the ground of alternate remedy of appeal before the Tribunal, but while passing the order this court has committed an error in not considering the clause (m) of sub-section (1) of Section 98 of Uttarakhand Cooperative Societies Act, 2003, wherein provision for appeal is made against the order of Registrar passed U/S 16-A, directing amalgamation or U/S 16- B, directing division and clause (a) of sub-section (2) of Section 98 of the Act, provides that the appeal under clause (m), of Section (1) of Section –98, if the decision or order was made by the Registrar, shall be preferred to the State Government. Therefore the recall application is allowed and the order dated 19-6-2012 passed by this Court is modified to the extent that the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternate remedy of appeal before the State Government in view of clause (a) of sub-section (2) of Section 98 of Uttarakhand Cooperative Societies Act, 2003. The submission of counsel for the review petitioner that no appeal shall lie against the impugned order passed by the Registrar, has no substance and is hereby rejected. ISB (B.S. Verma, J.) 09-05-2013 WPMS 3070/2001 Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. List in the next week. ISB (B.S.Verma, J.) 27-12-2012 WPMS 1332/2001 Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Mr. T.A. Khan Senior Advocate for the petitioner prays for and is granted further three days time to file the amended memo of petition. List in the next week. ISB (B.S.Verma, J.) 27-12-2012 CLMA 13525/2012 in A.O. No.598/2012 Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard Sri M.K. Goyal, Advocate for the appellant. Admit. Issue notices to the respondents. Summon the L.C.R. List after the LCR is received and service is effected upon the respondents. Also heard on stay application. If the appellant deposits a sum of Rs. eight lakhs, out of the awarded amount, before the MACT concerned within a period of six weeks, the execution of impugned award shall remain stayed. The stay application stands disposed of. ISB (B.S.Verma, J.) 18-12-2012