1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 323/2009 _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________ Mr. M.M. Avhad, Advocate for applicant. Mr. S.G. Nandedkar, A.P.P. for respondent No.4 / State CORAM ; A.V. NIRGUDE, J. Date :21 st September, 2010 1 This revision is filed against the judgment and order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-1, Beed dated 29/12/2008 acquitting the respondents of the offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code in Sessions Case No. 84/2007. On perusal of the judgment, it is seen that this murder case was based on circumstantial evidence. There were three accused. The accused No.1 was the wife of the deceased and the accused No.2 and 3 are the brothers of the accused No.1. It is amply proved before the lower Court that the deceased and accused No.1 were not on good terms. On or before 5th December, 2006, the family members of deceased Baban 2 realized that Baban was missing for few days and they started his search. Ultimately, on next day i. e. on 06/12/2006 Baban’s dead body was found. The prosecution could prove that Baban died of homicidal death. It is the prosecution case that some time during the night of 03/12/2006 the accused had committed Baban’s murder but besides suspicion, nothing came on record to connect them with the murder. The learned judge rightly held that the respondents / accused deserves acquittal. I find the judgment and order proper and no interference is called for. The revision dismissed. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] ts k/