IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND SEPTEMBER 2010 / 31ST BHADRA 1932 RP.No. 815 of 2010(U) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.23605/2009 Dated 20/01/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 ---------------------------------------- 1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.W.D.NATIONAL HIGHWAY, NH(B) DIVISION, KODUNGALLUR. 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, P.W.D.NATIONAL HIGHWAY, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VYTTILA, KOCHI. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, ADMINISTRATION & NATIONAL HIGHWAY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER & 3RD RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------ 1. PRAVEEN KUMAR P., THARAYIL THURAVOOR P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, NO.8/1187, ARUMUGHAM COLONY, CHANDRANAGAR, PALAKKAD. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. SANTHOSH P.N THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- R.P.NO.815 OF 2010 in WP(c).No.23605/09 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2010 O R D E R The writ petition was disposed of by judgment dated 20.1.2010, directing the first respondent to disburse the amount that is due to the petitioner. A reading of the judgment shows that in the counter affidavit filed, the first respondent had accepted the liability and it was on that basis the judgment was rendered. Review now sought is on the basis that the State of Kerala was not a party and the liability is that of the State. In the absence of such a contention in the counter affidavit, the review now filed, that too after a contempt of court proceedings alleging disobedience of the judgment to a Division Bench, is unsustainable and is only to be dismissed. Review Petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :