^l IN TIiE HIGH COURT OFCHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR Wnt Petition No.^o)7/2004 PETmONER :.../A*-'< ..••'A^-~ ..^•M/ y .•••">%::" p*<^ ..<--y ^. .' %^ Sdpati Sngh- S/o Late NayanSingt^ Aged atoui 56 year&^ R/o Belwatikar, Daltongunj, Disttict ~ Palan^ JliaiMiatidL Vemii&- WRIT PETITION 1. %ate of Qihattisgarfi, tihroug^i Secretary, Departaient of Horr^/ Mantralaya,, Stiastd Chowl^ RaipUT(CG-). 2. SqpNarinteiident of Police. Baaspur(CGL) 3. Shri Abdul Rashid, S/o Shri Abdul Hafij, Aged about 51 yeors/ Proprietor M/s A R Tradmg Cotiyatiy/ neat' CMD. Cotlege, LirikRoad, Bilaspta'(CG.) UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IW THE NATURB OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC.OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR QRD^R_TQ_DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. XI-HC—78 ^ll^l'^1 ^fe W?? 3i?^T ^RN?> ^^ 'S^f '^it^iKn^, y>Tii'<-i<t<?, [sldiy^ ^^^.89.ll.?>.<i, ^ *IWCTI »)^l<sh"""""""""""~"""""""""""""""^200 ^T^T Tra^F? (<i?I^^) I^TW ^rft<T ^T^?T 24.12.2004 Oil a mention beia hearing, Shri Prashaiit Jaiswa] 226/ 227 of tlie Constit^ respondent No/r & 2 be] prodiice hiin before the <| (Jharkhaiid), declare him a^ ^F5fepfl';T ^P-^if ^ f^^l <f^t^i<' '^3J{OT3il^T made, the niatter is taken up for , counsel for tlie petitioner, Sint. Fduzia Mirza, Pajnel Law^7er for the State. The petitioner has rjioved fhis writ petition uncler Article jtion of ludia with fhe prayer that directed to arrcst rcspondent No.3/ pourt of C.J.M., Dalfaiigunj/ Palamu abscoadiag aad attach his property. Brief facts leadiag Ijo filing of fhis petition are fhat tlie petitioner herem filed a Coi^iplamt Case No. 17/ 01 before tlie Chief Judicial Magistrate, Da|tangunj; Palaniu (JIiarkhaad) for coBimission of offence zindjer Sections 419, 420 & 406 of Indiaa Penal Code agamst respon<| on that coniplahit leanied aforesaid offences agaiast ijespondent No.3 aad sunimoned hiin to appear before the said coiir|: on 15,1,2001, However, on 16,2.2001 on the request of the COBIJ arrest was directed to be is|iued to produce respondent No.3 before th.e said court on 5,3.2001 ordered tliat tiie niatter b ent No,3 hereia. It appears that based Magistrate took tih.e cognizaiice of fhe ^laiaaiit / petitk)ner herein warrant of and vide order dated 20.2.2002 itwas s fixed on 12.3.2002 fororder under Sections 82 & 83 of Cr.P.C.I It appears that in tl^e meaiitime, respondeut herein raoved anticipatory bail before tb.^ Palamzi, but the same ha^ Court of Sessions Judge, Daltongunj, been rejected by the said court .yide_ XI-HC—78 ^^'^T'ftFri^ W? 3?T^T^Tqw .^- ^ ^sf ^i^Kn^, ^Til^^i^, 'f^TTRy *<1*ICTI ^HT^ •^200 ^li^T '??^5l ('^^f^1^) ^"^w^f^r^^i B^mg aiid order dated 7.9.2001. rcspondent No,3 moved an|tici Jharkhand at Ranchi aad Court of Jharkhaad direcNd the court below, As bom-out from Palainu sent a coisiinun^ Officer In-charge, BUaspui'l arrest aiid process under agaiast respondent No.3 fhat process zinder Sectioi|LS early as possible. I have heard learadd question ofadinission. It has not been warrao.t of arrest was coianiunication (Annexiire Station House Officer, Pollcj is residiiig or to the Distr^ct Moreover, Annexiire P-4 is Sections 82 & 83 of Cr. P. C. | As per provisions of reason io believe that any p\ issued by U has absconde^ zvairant cannot be execu^ vroclamniwn recfuirina hzm ^i^i<vi<fl1i ^iw^ff'^'fex^ i[^^s< '^T^siSR^I^? dissatisfied wifh fhe said order, i|ticipatory bail before the High Coiirt of jvide orderdated 10.10.2001 ttie High respondent No.3 to surrender before 1phie records, the C,J,M., Daltongunj, |ition (Amiexure P-4) addressed to fhe (C.G.) fhat a non-bailable warraiit of $ections 82 & 83 of Cr.P.C. be issiied furfher directed tlie Officer In-charge 82 & 83 of Cr.P.C. be executed as coiuisel for fhe petitiorier on the mentjioned ia fhis; petitton that to whoin the ^aaded over. In the first irLstance, y-4) is not eorrectly addressed either to ^ Statk)n where respondent No,3 hereiii Superintendent of Potfce, Bilaspur. |iot in accordance withi the provisions of |ections 82 ofCr.P.C., 'ifdny Couttfzas ^rsonagainstwhom a warranthas been or is concealing himself so that such ^d, such Court may publisH a wriUen Uo apDear at a specified Dlace_andW a 1 XI-HC—78 W^T13FTl^feF "<T^?a^?T^IW ^^ ~;:3TFT^T^ ^Tl1<4^ <wmi%s*ii^ ••^200 ^I^T 1(7^T ('^3^^) 1FRHW ^ft^T ^tT^? -^l speeified time not less tha^i such proclamation3. There| issuance of proclaniation. Court issuing a proclamafi\ be recorded inwriting, at order the attachment of a| boih, belonging io ihe SectiLon 83 further envisa^e attachmeni of any properfy district in which it is made:! any properiy belonging io endorsed by ihe Disirict property is situate'. Sub-$ property ordered io be a:f{ under ihis section shalL ir^ State Govemment be inad^ ivhich the land is siiuate\ Therefore, iii order toj the first iastaace, fhe coui-| iainioveable and movable fhereafter, the order court, Thereafter, the provisions of Section 83 th|< Chief Judicial Magistrate accused, regarc[|uag ^iqfe^iN WR^if ^ fe1^' '?N^K ^T 3?Rp? ^ii^y thirty days fromthe date ofpublishing JTore, Section 82 of Cr.P.C. provides for pection 83 of Cr,P.C. envisages fhat '^ze >n under Section 82 may, for reasons to ^ny time afier the issue of proclamaiion, \ty property; moveable or nnjnovable or pTpclanned person\ Sub-section (2) of ;s fhat ( such order shall authorize the belonging io such person zmthin ihe andrt shall cmthorize ^he attcichment of ^uch person wiihoui such disirict when ^Iagistrate imthin whose district such -^ection (4) further envisages that 'zf </ie ^ached is immoveable, the attachmeni the case of land payitig revenue io the ^ ihrotigh the CollectQr of the District in Bieet fhe requircments of Sectk)n 83 ia concenied is reqiured to ascertahi the p|noperties of ttie proclaimed ofiender aad attachraent is to be passed by tliat District Magistrate or as per Polfce Officer is to be directed by the cjoncenied to attach flie property of the codcemed T '3^[ ^jq|<rj|q, ^Tll^}^ M<rlH^< WH^I ?bNi<^ ^ii^l'^TftFTNF 'CTT3?i^T^??^ -sr ^' (~J ^?r XR^F (^3^1) ^1^?W^^ 3^T ^l- i-'enisal ol Annexure H -4 reveals ttiat such procedure has not been adopted by teamed (phief Judicial Magisti-ate. In the said coniHiunicatbn the descrifj attached ra pursuaace o| m.entioned, In view of fh< substaace ia th.is writ petttic|n. In fhe first nistance, fhe officer who is not cora^ concemed is corapetent to c offender aad issue order for this writ petition, same i] accordiagly, disniissed. <^I^S<ri4i'f'RTWif ^ 'fe^ <I^^S< '^^H3?T^T tfon of the property, which is to be fh:e C.J,M, order, has not been above reason, I do not fuid aay it has not been inentioued ia the writ petitton fhat to whoin warraiit dfarrest has been sent aad which is lyuig wifh fhe directions of the C.J.M. The relief sought for ui Pai|agraph7.3 jcaiinot be graiited by this Coiirt, fbr fhat purpose f4e Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate leclare respondent No,3 as proclaimed ^ttachnientjofthe propcrty, In view ofthe foregoin^ discussion, I do not fiiid aay force ui liable to j be disniissed aad it is, Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge .;, GRPRJ—FS/35&—12/2000—50,000. ^ ^s"