1 wp 5508 -10 & other IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5508/2010 Dnyaneshwar N.Waghmode & Anr. Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3272/2010 Ulhas R.Patil & Anr. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents Mr.S.K.Shinde i/b Mr.G.A.Kshirsagar for Petitioners. Mrs.Thakur for Res.1 to 3 ,5 & 8 Mr.C.S.Joshi for Res.4,6 & 7 CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : AUGUST ,2, 2010. P.C. : . Heard counsel for the petitioners and respondent. Counsel for the respondent at the outset has submitted that respondent-4 Zilla Parishad issued fresh advertisement on 10/4/2010 for feeling up the post of Gramsevaks . It is submitted that both the petitioners did not apply pursuant to the said advertisement and therefore they cannot 2 wp 5508 -10 & other canvass any grievance in this regard at this stage. Counsel for the petitioners though states that the petitioners applied pursuant to the said advertisement , there is no statement in the petitions made by the petitioners in this regard and in absence thereof it is not possible for us to show any indulgence in the present petitions. 2. In the circumstances the Writ Petitions are disposed of. However, it is made clear that if the statement made by learned counsel for respondent-4 found to be false it will be open for the petitioners to take appropriate steps for redressal of their grievance before the competent forum. (D. D. SINHA, J.) (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)