In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No.M-24590 of 2010(O&M) Date of decision: 27.9.2010 Pawan Kumar ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Veneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Satyavir Singh Yadav, DAG, Haryana. Mr.Sagar Deswal, Advocate, for the complainant. **** SABINA, J. This petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 222 dated 22.6.2010, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Mohindergarh District Mohindergarh. While issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court on 25.8.2010:- “ Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is neither the beneficiary nor Criminal Misc. No.M-24590 of 2010(O&M) -2- is the witness to the alleged sale deed. Notice of motion for 27.9.2010. In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be admitted to interim bail subject to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. He shall abide by the conditions envisaged under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. List along with CRM-M No.22677 of 2010. Learned State counsel, on instructions from HC Surinder Singh, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation in terms of the order reproduced above. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and the order granting interim bail dated 25.8.2010 is made absolute. (SABINA) JUDGE September 27, 2010 anita