IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 6TH OCTOBER 2008 / 14TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 29295 of 2008(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. MAJU MOHAN KOVALIL, AGED 23 YEARS S/O.MOHANAN.K., ASWATHY, P.O.UDINUR, PADANNA VILLAGE, PADANNA AMSOM DESOM HOSDUNG TALUK OF KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 2. ANJU.S.NAIR, AGED 24 YEARS D/O. SASIDHARAN NAIR CHOORAKATU HOUSE, P.O.ALAKODE, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN 670 571. BY ADV. SRI.C.PUSHPODARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, KANNUR UNIVERSITY, KANNUR. 2. THE REGISTRAR KANNUR UNIVERSITY, MANGATTUPARAMBA, P.O.UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, KANNUR. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS KANNUR UNIVERSITY, MANGATTUPARAMBA, P.O.UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, KANNUR. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, COLLEGE OF NURSING A.C.M.E.PARIYARAM, P.O.PARIYARAM, KANNUR DISTRICT PIN 670 503. BY SC SRI.M.SASEENDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).29295/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 6th day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioners along with others, stated to be similarly situated, are prosecuting the B.Sc Nursing Course and they had approached this Court earlier in Writ Peittion.No.2506/2007, complaining that they are not allowed to writ 3rd year B.Sc Nursing Examination because they were yet to pass all the papers in the 2nd year Nursing examination. There was also a complaint that they did not get sufficient time for seeking revaluation of the papers. This Court in Ext.P1 judgment directed that the petitioners in the said writ petition be permitted to writ the 3rd year examination on a provisional basis and the results shall be published only if, on revaluation of the failed subjects in the 2nd year examination, they pass in such subjects. Apparently, the revaluation did not make any better results in so far as the petitioners and others in Ext.P1 judgment are concerned. But they appeared for the supplementary examination successfully and W.P.(C).29295/2008 2 some of them sought for a review of Ext.P1 judgment, which was allowed under Ext.P2 holding that University shall publish the result of the 3rd year examination of those candidates who have passed the second year supplementary examination. Petitioners and similarly situated persons claim that they have passed the 2nd year examination in the supplementary examination. In my view, Ext.P2 order will enure only in favour of those persons who are figured as petitioners in R.P.689/2007. It is open to the petitioners herein to seek a review of Ext.P1 judgment and claim similar benefit. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioners arising on the strength of Ext.P2 order. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs