IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2011 / 9TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23374 of 2011(V) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JENNY,W/O.THEKKANATH ANTO THEKKANATH HOUSE, CHALAKKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR) MUKUNDAPURAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 001. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, CHALAKKUDY EAST MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 307. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE THRISSUR 680 001. ADV. SRI. JAMES MATHEW KADAVAN- GOVT. PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 23374 of 2011(V) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: COPY OF LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 6.1.2011 ISSUED BY CHALAKUDY EAST VILLAGE TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P1(a): COPY OF PROPERTY TAX RECEIPT DT 6.1.2011 ISSUED BY THE CHALAKUDY MUNICIPALITY TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2: COPY OF DEMAND CUM RECOVERY NOTICE DTD 26.8.2010 ISSUED BY R1 TO ANTO. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE. acd S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.23374 OF 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner apprehending proceeding against her properties for recovery of fine amount imposed on her husband by the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Muvattupuzha in C.C.No.468/2000. The petitioner has not produced any evidence to show that her properties have been proceeded against. The petitioner has not chosen even to implead her husband as a party to the writ petition. The petitioner has not stated as to whether she is in good terms or bad terms with her husband. In fact the petitioner does not even say in the writ petition as to where her husband is at present. 2. The learned Government Pleader submits that no proceedings have been initiated against the properties of the petitioner yet. Ext.P2 proceedings are not against the petitioner's husband. W.P.(C)No.23374/11 2 In the above circumstances, I do not find any merit in this writ petition and accordingly, the same is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd W.P.(C)No.23374/11 3