IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1458 of 2008 UMA DEVI Versus SHIV NANDAN MANDAL & ORS ----------- 2 4.9.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, the impugned order does not suffer from any jurisdictional error and this civil revision application must be dismissed. The scope of Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure for making a clerical correction cannot be extended to such an extent that when an order was never passed by the Court that may also be corrected. This story of there being an application for substitution of the wife and three daughters and the Court below due to inadvertence allowing only to substitute wife has to be noticed for its being rejected. There are clear averments on this score by the Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties that an application was filed only for the substitution of wife Uma Devi and that was allowed by the Court below on 28.8.1997. There is nothing on record to show that an application dated 4.6.1996 for seeking substitution of the mother and the three daughters. As a matter of fact the Court below has correctly analyzed this aspect from another angle by looking into the age of Reena Devi and Meera Kumari 2 who in the month of December, 2003 were aged about 19 & 22 years respectively. Taking clue from this aspect, the Court below has correctly proceeded to hold that showing them to be major in the application allegedly filed on 4.6.1996 was absolutely incorrect and in fact, there was no such application or there was no such effort for impleadment of the daughters in the Court below. Consequently, if the Appellate Court has not found the same to be a clerical error, this Court would not exercise its power under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure in interfering with the same order. Accordingly, this civil revision is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)