1 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Family Court Appeal No.32 of 2003 Pradeep Raghunath Penkar Appellant Vs. Shweta Pradeep Penkar Respondent And Santosh Mhatre Co-Respondent Mr.C.K.Bhangoji i/b. Mr.R.K.Mendadkar for appellant. Mr.Nitin Patil i/b. Mr.Uday Warunjikar for respondent no.1. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.G.KARNIK,JJ. March 21, 2009. P.C. . This appeal was heard from time to time and on 10/2/2009 the parties had stated before us that they would like to compromise the matrimonial dispute. On 24/2/2009 the parties with their family members met us in the chamber and it was clarified that the settlement was not possible, so far as the appellant’s side is concerned. The appellant as well as his father and sisters insisted that they would not agree the respondent joining the matrimonial home. We had, therefore, directed the matter to be listed for further hearing so as to decide it on merits. The 2 appeal appeared before us on 19th March 2009 when nobody was present for the appellant. On 20th March 2009 again it was called out for hearing and none appeared for the appellant but a request was made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant by his colleague and, therefore, we made it stand over till today. When the appeal is called out for hearing today, Mr.C.K. Bhangoji makes a request on behalf of Mr.Mendadkar to grant one week’s time. . We are thus satisfied that this appeal deserves to be dismissed for non-prosecution and the same is hereby dismissed as such. (D.G.KARNIK,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)