IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 4TH AUGUST 2009 / 13TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 20178 of 2009(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.V.GEORGEKUTTY @ GEORGEKUTTY.K.VARGHESE S/O.VARGHESE, KOKKOTTU PUTHEN VEEDU, KIZHAKKEKARA, KOTTARAKKARA REPRESENTED BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SUMOL ALEX, GEO BHAVAN, KAVINGODE BHAGOM, PULAMON P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KOTTARAKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH COMMITTEE, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. THE KOTTARAKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KOTTARAKKARA P.O., KOLLAM. ADV. SRI.C.J.JOY, SC,KOTTARAKKARA G.PANCHAYA FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO. 20178 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2009 JUDGMENT Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents, it appears that Ext.P2 was issued apparently without hearing the petitioner, at least in so far as the decision thereon in refusing to number one of the buildings is concerned. Therefore it is ordered that on petitioner making appropriate representation in answer to the contents of Ext.P2, that will be considered and a decision taken independently by the Panchayat Secretary within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment and that representation. All issues on merits left open. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/4/8