IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 27TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 6TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 34872 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SINIMOL, POTTAKANAYATHU KEDARAM, CHERAVALLI, KARTHIKAPALLY, KAYAMKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., ALAPPUZHA. 3. SPECIAL SALE OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., ALAPPUZHA. 4. AJITH S.NAIR, THONDIYATHU HOUSE, ANGADIKKAL POST, CHENGANNUR. R2, R3 BY ADV.SRI.VIJAYAMOHAN, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.34872 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner contends that she is only a guarantor for the transaction that led to Ext.P1 and that the same cannot be permitted to be held. Ext.P1 is a proceedings for sale following an arbitration award under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The award amount was Rs.12,09,754/- and the amount fixed for recovery from sale as on 22.10.2008 is Rs.21,34,484/- as per Ext.P1. The plea of the petitioner that she is only a guarantor does not make any difference because Ext.P1 shows that the petitioner and her husband are co-debtors. The total accruals, as of now, has mounted to be more than Rs.21 lakhs. I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned proceedings, particularly when it is a cash-credit facility availed and defaulted by the husband of the petitioner. The writ petition fails. The same is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.