: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.342 OF 2002 APPEAL NO.342 OF 2002 APPEAL NO.342 OF 2002 IN IN IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.614 OF 2001 ARBITRATION PETITION NO.614 OF 2001 ARBITRATION PETITION NO.614 OF 2001 REPL Engineering Limited ... Appellants V/s. Tata Finance Limited & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.Vijay Nair i/b O.A. Siddique & J.R. Khan for Appellants Mr.Phiroz Punniwalla i/b Y.R. Shah for Respondent No.1 CORAM: H.L. GOKHALE & H.L. GOKHALE & H.L. GOKHALE & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATED: SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard Mr.Nair in support of the praecipe which is filed for speaking to the order which we have passed on 26.7.2004. Mr.Punniwalla is present for the Respondents i.e., Tata Finance Limited, the original respondents in the appeal. 2. We are of the view that both the parties should clear the fees of the Arbitrator which are due to him as of now for all the work done including the work which has gone into award that has been set aside. They may as well get the rate of fees decided for the future work and then they should decide about their future course of action. Nothing further is required to be stated beyond : 2 : what is stated herein. Praecipe disposed of. 3. Certified copy expedited. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (NISHITA MHATRE, J.)