IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No. 16386 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : OCTOBER 27, 2009 TARLOK CHAND ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the certificate for 1 year 11 months experience that has been made the basis for cancelling the order of appointment, was never taken into account. It is, however, the admitted case of the petitioner that the petitioner had filed the certificate along with the application form. Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioner to file a better petition along with the form to show that the Evaluation Committee had also considered the document Civil Writ Petition No. 16386 of 2009 2 as an invalid document. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action, with better particulars. October 27, 2009 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?