THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 19465 OF 2005 DATED: 02.09.2005 Between: B. Venkateswara Reddy … PETITIONER AND The Deputy Registrar of Companies, Hyderabad & another. … RESPONDENTS ORAL ORDER: The petitioner filed a representation, dated 15.04.2005, before the 1st respondent to inform him whether an agency by name “News Flash”, is registered with it or not. The said information became relevant for him in the context of working out his rights against the 2nd respondent in an Industrial Dispute. The petitioner contends that though in the order of appointment, the name of News Flash was incorporated, he was in fact employed by the 2nd respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that even after receiving his representation, dated 15.04.2005, the 1st respondent did not pass any order. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is for the petitioner to plead and establish as to who is his employer. If he is of the view that the 2nd respondent is his employer, he has to establish that fact, by leading oral or documentary evidence. When according to the petitioner, News Flash is either a non-existing organization or, at any rate, not his employer, it hardly makes any difference for him whether it was registered or not, with the 1st respondent. In that view of the matter, this Court does not find any merits in the writ petition and the same is dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________________ 02.09.2005 ES