IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2011 / 2ND POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 34832 of 2011(D) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- ARUNKUMAR.V, S/O.RAVEENDRAN, AGED 24, VARADA HOUSE, KARUVANNUR, NADUVANNOOR, CALICUT - 673 614. BY ADV. SRI.E.NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O, PIN - 673 636. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PIN - 673 636. R1 & R2 BY ADV.SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DG WP(C).No. 34832 of 2011(D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION OF THE ANSWER PAPER OF THE FIFTH SEMESTER OF B.TECH. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DATED 08.12.2011 FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE FEE FOR REVALUATION AND PHOTOCOPY. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION OF ANSWER PAPERS OF THE THIRD SEMESTER OF B.TECH. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DATED 08.12.2011 FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE FEE FOR REVALUATION AND PHOTOCOPY. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE DG ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).34832/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioner, who completed his B.Tech Course, applied for revaluation of some papers of the said Course vide Exts.P1 and P3 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. 4.Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs