IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.25970 -M of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : MARCH 04, 2010 KANTA & ORS. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Pavan Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Deepak Manchanda, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Order dated 16.9.2009 makes it clear that notice of motion was issued only to explore the possibility of settlement. Learned counsel for respondent No.2/complainant contends that there is no chance of settlement. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. It is, however, made clear that the petitioners would be at liberty to take the plea, during the course of trial, to the effect that the disputes had been settled by way of compromise, however, respondent No.2 is not abiding by the terms thereof. March 04, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?