IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3939 of 2011 1. MD. SABIR ALAM 2. MD. AZAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 28.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioners and, as a matter of fact, they have been implicated in this case. It is also pointed out by him that after the arrest of the petitioners, the police lodged the present case. It is further contended by him that the seizure list does not bear the signature of the petitioners and moreover, the seized articles were produced by the police before the Investigating Officer. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Gaya G.R.P. P.S. Case No. 210 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )