BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty First day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14022 of 2011 R.PALANIAPPAN .. PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KARAIKUDI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT IN CRIME NO. 20/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.KALAILINGAM Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAI PANDI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprenhending arrest, the petitioner, in Crime No.20 of 2011 in the file of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code, has come forward with this Petition seeking for anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of prosecution, the de-facto complainant's daughter by name Sohee Bhuvaneswari, was kidnapped by the first accused with the help of other petitioners. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner has produced an order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in H.C.P(MD) No.807 of 2011, dated 18.10.2011. Wherein, the Division Bench of this Court has recorded that the victim Bhuvaneswari was produced before the Division Bench of this Court and she stated that she was 23 years old and she married the first accused on 11.07.2011 itself. 4.It is also brought to the notice of this Court that both the first accused and the victim girl are postgradutes. Having regard to the above statement made by the alleged victim that she was nit kidnapped and she went on her own accord to marry the first accused, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerend and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. sd/- 21/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KARAIKUDI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KARAIKUDI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT +2. CC to M/S. M.KALAILINGAM Advocate SR.No.36691 rl/7c – 21.10.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14022 of 2011 Date :21/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/