IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2465 of 2001 VIDYA NAND RAI & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6. 04.09.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. None appears for the private respondents. 2. Petitioners are aggrieved by the appellate order dated 10.11.2000 passed by the Collector, East Champaran, Motihari in R.A.No. 18 of 1996-97, Annexure-1, whereunder order dated 06.07.1997 passed by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Pakridayal in Bataidari Case No. 4 of 1994-95, Annexure-2, rejecting the claim of the petitioners alleging ejectment from the lands in-question has been affirmed. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the evidence led on their behalf which is contained in Annexure-3 was not considered. Perusal of the evidence, Annexure-3 does not indicate that the witnesses ever said that the petitioners cultivate the lands in- question. 4. In the circumstances, - 2 - according to this Court failure to consider such evidence does not vitiate the two impugned orders as thereunder it has been held that the petitioners wanted to purchase the lands in-question and on failure of the sale negotiation raised Bataidari dispute. There does not appear to be any illegality either in the original order dated 06.07.1997 (Annexure-2) passed in Bataidari Case No. 4 of 1994- 95 by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Pakridayal who has accepted the report of the Bataidari Board nor in the appellate order dated 10.11.2000, Annexure-1, whereunder the order dated 06.07.1997, Annexure-2 has been affirmed. In the circumstances, I do not find any merit in this writ application, which is dismissed. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)