IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.332 of 2008 Surendra Prasad Thakur, son of Hirdya Narayan Thakur, resident of Village_Patahi, P.S. Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur -------------- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Collector, Muzaffarpur. 3. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Muzaffarpur East, Dsitrict Muzaffarpur 4. The Circle Officer, Mushahari, District- Muzaffarpur 5. Jagannath Thakur, son of late Lakshmi Thakur 6. Ram Naresh Thakur, son of late Ram Sakal Thakur 7. Suresh Thakur, son of late Ram sakal Thakur 8. Baidyanath Thakur, son of late Jangi Thakur 9. Saraswati Devi, Daughter of Yogendra Thakur 10. Braj Mohan Thakur 11. Hari Mohan Thakur 12. Sunil Kumar, all sons of Raghunath Thakur, all resident of Village- Patahi Jagarnath P.S. Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur ------------- Respondents. -------------- 2. 18.3.2009 Heard Mr. Vijoy Kumar Singh for the petitioner, and Mr. Kumar Alok, learned Standing Counsel No.19. Aggrieved by the order dated 23.8.2003(Annexure-1), passed by respondent no.3, the petitioner herein has preferred revision application bearing Revision Case No. 158 of 2003-04 before respondent no.2 under the Bihar Tenant’s Holdings (Maintenance of Records) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition with the prayer to direct respondent no.2 to dispose of the revision application expeditiously. It appears that the materials on record do not suggest that the petitioner made any attempt to 2 move respondent no.2 for expeditious disposal of the revision application, instead has rushed to this Court burdening it with a most unwanted matter. It is accordingly dismissed. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar ,J. )