IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.4375/2010 Pradeep @ Prahlad Vs. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor Date of Order ::: 15.07.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Sandeep Maheshwari, Counsel for petitioner Shri Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor #### By the Court:- Learned counsel for petitioner argued that the bail application of the petitioner was rejected by the court below vide its order dated 19.02.2010 on the premise that there were number of cases pending against the petitioner and that in the present case already 12 witnesses have been examined and only two witnesses remain to be examined and they have been summoned. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that even after lapse of five months and despite summoning of those witnesses by bailable warrants, they are not turning up and trial is not proceeding. The Investigating Officer of the case is present in the court. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that he would instruct the IO to produce those witnesses so that the trial, which is already stayed for last six months for want of their appearance, may proceed further. In the facts of this case when the trial is at the verge of conclusion, I am not inclined to allow this bail application. The bail application is accordingly rejected. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it at the earliest. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//