r C 1 - u .-. /. IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARHAT BILASPUR (C. G.l W, P. (S) N0. •S^\\__QVi 2010 PETITIONER .-^^ ..,c_ -(.y^'f^" ^-•^\^.^ ^:{s^y"'^^'^ y^esw°- ' ^,-1 ^ Jaylesh Sori S/oAnkaliiram Sori, aged about -41 years, R/o - Village - Tumsanar, Post - Useli, TahsJlAntagarh District- North Bastar, Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^tftM'Ss/^ /^^^^ ixL.^S^\^ 1. State o f Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Panchayat & Social Welfare D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. The Director, Panchayat & SocialWelfare, NorthBastar Kanker (C.G.) 3." The CoUector, North Bastar, Kanker (Chhattisgarh) 4. The Chief Executive Officer District Panchayat, North Bastar, Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA :- '::'.:^-.?':^!'-^.^'^??^^^£^^^^^^^-^'-'^-^^^4^?^J^^^^'i^ '^^^S&i^^R^^^^SS^S^^^^^ HIG»COURT'OE'.CHHATTISOARH AT 'BTE^SPBR,: ^s W^.tSt«Q^SAia^20IO Tersus RESPONDENTS .jaylesh'Sori State of C.G. 85 Others WRTT PETITION osfiSR ASTKaaesse OF •ram CONSTITUTKMI oiin Shri Dharmesli Shrivastaya; eoLfnsel for.tbe petitioner. 'Shri IPrayeen Das, Dy.: G.A..: fpr tKe State. ! - 1 • : :.' IBDIA ;.:'i:S°®20.09.20tOl;.•-,'^t. :'.::'.:- :::.: 'IShallenge^Ma^t&ls'.vpetKibii^,]^ (AnnE^Fe:?iP-lt};''^s^^:;.^^tHerf^.F<3:fi^DistEic£'iP^ BasiaJ^^KajaKey r^spi'Wo/^.ftCT^in;: ,:^ '•'l!K^:'."lt:^ ••It^,;has.'': en~.:';poii^ed, .::cBj;t;,:.1^ responderits/State-that^ agaihst'theorder^impugned^eiB'^peal lies.in view of'the provisiQns of Section.91 of I'arichayat .Raj A3hiniya.m.;.lQ93 and Eule 3' oi' Chhattisgarh:.PancKayat (Appeat and Revision)! Rules' 1995, made'fhere-under arid.t&us the 'petitforieF'is :reqiiireci^;1jci?first^ apprbachtheColIect&r-resp.:';N0.3:lheraR.-:: •:•.!.-.i^^^ • In t se,cireuHistaHces,.counseIiforlfael®etition.ers^bt^ he may- be^permitfed: ,to withdraw this petition Iwith liberty ,td EIe:ian.; appropriafe.appeal.Ifc-however.aibmits thata.si this'peMtion.w l^the'petitioner before this.Ct^rt, at the'time qffiling t]'ie:appeat,'the; ., limitation liiay osme in the 'way"and;fherefbre ,a' direetion •may' be^ issued Itiait the appeltafe::.auth6nty. shaU ,.c6nsideF^"t 'R<3infe oP ; .limitatian liberally. ; ' • AGcardmgly, Ahe .petition'4s disaiissed' as< -withdpaWn !wijt}'i;;t)'ie, :ltberty as afbresaid. If the^peftfipner: fiies tlie appeal withinj:a^pei-iod^,sf;'; one mbnth;from the'dafeofreceipt oT'coRyiof'tKisiidrderialohg^ifKiari.:; applicafion; jbr cqndpnatipn of?<ieiay, thesajii&sKaII.be eQnsict^fedl^ the appellate authonty liberaily.keerang' m'.raind'the'jpendenGy' pf^ petition befbrethis.Gourt. r Sd/- pritinkerDiwakar Judge ;1:j.u