IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20654 of 2010 RAMNIWASH SHARMA @ SIPAHI SHARMA SON OF SRI UCHIT SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2. 17.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 452, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted that even though the petitioner is a co-villager of the informant and the witnesses subsequently named the petitioner, he is not named in the First Information Report. In view of such, let the petitioner, named above, who is in custody since 8.4.2010 and has no case of recent origin pending against the petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Belaganj P.S. case No.79 of 2001, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in - 2 - the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on the date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )