IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3035 of 2006 RAJESHWAR PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 27.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The only reason why the Court is not inclined to entertain the writ application is because this writ application has been filed as an after thought at a belated stage after superannuation of the petitioner on 31.3.1998, seeking a direction upon the respondents to now grant him promotion notionally because the so called juniors has now been promoted. This writ application is a totally misplaced kind of writ as it suffers from latches and delay. Even otherwise such a benefit cannot be given when the petitioner has already superannuated and gone home years ago. This writ application is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)