IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 259 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 259 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 259 OF 2005 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 53 OF 2004 SECOND APPEAL NO. 53 OF 2004 SECOND APPEAL NO. 53 OF 2004 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders and Registrar’s orders : Court’s or Judge’s orders ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. DATED: 9TH SEPT., 2005 DATED: 9TH SEPT., 2005 DATED: 9TH SEPT., 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard advocate for the applicants. None for the respondents though served. 2. The appeal is admitted and parties were directed to maintain status-quo pending hearing of the application. It appears that the lower appellate Court has granted decree of perpetual injunction against the present appellant and it sought to be stayed. 3. Perusal of contents of the application shows that, it is necessary to maintain status-quo with regard to the suit property without giving any further relief. Under the circumstances, the application is made absolute to the extent of direction that both parties shall maintain status-quo as on today with regard to the suit property pending appeal. With this direction, the application stands disposed of. .......