sra cp <Srz> INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. ~^ 7 ^ Of 2007 PETITIONER ./ .^^s^ MANNU LAL DEWANGAN, aged about 46 years S/o Late Shri Panch Ram Dewangan , Lab. Technician,Artificial ^\''^ ..-• insemination Centa-e, Key Village \^<'teR?f Scheme O/o Deputy Du-ector , !a\'T/^ Veterinary Services , Rajnandgaon ..•••v<^> District Rajnandgaon (CG). -i v VERSUS ^ RESPONDENTS : l.The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Departraent ofVeterinary Services , Mantralay - D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur ^of^ _ m- v _ /^'i^ 2.Du-ector , Directorate ^ V O' Ser^ices , Near Guru Tej Bahadur ?c>7~) ^ot>''- ^"-'~^~_' Park, G.E. Road, Raipur (CG). ^ ^^ss^ ^y^~^h ^APAR^'^ liul ^N^'%:n^l- -t.-', ''<iSS''-ull^£{{^y 'v-5&'^SwSyf 3. Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, (Key Village Scheine) District Rajnandgaon (CG). 4. Treasuiy Of&cer, District Treasury , Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .^^ HICTjCOURT OF CHHATTESeARH AT BILAS3UR Writ Petition (5) No. 776 of 2007 Petitioner Mannu Lal Dewargan Versus Respondents The State of Chha'ttisgnrh &others Si»^leBench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. ^gniho'h'i. Present: Mr. S. K. Thomas, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sushil Dubey, Sovernment Advocate for the Stote/respondents. OR&ER (Passed on 8tl> Day of februnry, 2<X)7) The following order of the Court was passed by Satish K. ^gnihctri, J. I. Learned counsel appearin9 for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Lab Assistant on ad hoc basis by order dated 15.5.85 (P/l) by the Joint Director, Veterina^ Services, Jagdolpur, Distr-ict- Bastar. The petitioner continued as ad hoc Lab Assistant till he was re9ularized in service on 31.8.89 P/2). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits thut the petitioner is entitied to yorri of annual increments in view of Circular' No. C/3-5/93/3/0ne dated 12.5.1993 p/4) issued by the ©overnnient of Madhya Pradedi, Seneral Administrative Department. In vieuu of the said circular, the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to rnake a representation before the concerned authorities for arant of annuat increments, to which learned counsel appeoring for the respondents/State has no objection. 3. In the event a representotion is mode, the respondents oMthorities mcy consider the same, in accordance with !c»B,on its own nierit, within a period of eight weeks from the receipt of representation, if any. 4. The petition stands accordin9ly disposed of with the above stated liberty. No order os to costs. _^^,^_ Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihoti' Judge Thakur