IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.7598 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.12.2009 Sunil Makkar .....Petitioner versus M/s Ronson International and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Amit Rawal, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) In this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-landlord seeks directions to the Executing Court to pass appropriate orders in the execution application No.56 of 2009, especially for the reasons that the respondent-tenant has not paid the arrears of rent despite the orders passed by this Court as well as by the Rent Controller, Ludhiana, dated 13.8.2009. Having heard counsel for the petitioner and after going through the orders dated 25.9.2007 and 19.10.2007 passed by this Court, prima-facie, there appears to be some substance in the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner that the respondent-tenant is delaying the execution C.R. No.7598 of 2009 (O&M) 2 proceedings on one pretext or the other and without paying any rent. However, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, the revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the Rent Controller-cum-Executing Court, Ludhiana, to decide the execution application No.56 of 2009 as early as possible but not later than 28.2.2010. The compliance report be sent. Dasti. 21-12-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE