c' ^ Sin9l''36nGh IN THE HIGH COBRT OF JUDIQVT@RE QF CHHATTISGAKHj|r BILASPUR WRIT PETITIWI N0. '2-3° /2005 PETItIQNE8£: .^'^ ^ ~^'-.l ^%^? ^y yw /w ^l)Upendra Singh Yadav S/0- Madaw Sing Yadav Aged about 26 years ; Constable no. 292 2 Battalion Special armed forces Sakari ( Bilaspur) Distt- Bilaspur (C.G.) ^ /2)Shiv Singh Kyswa S/0- Ram Singfa Kiiswa Aged abouf 28 years Constable a6. 277 2 Battalion Special armed forces Sakaa-i ( Bilaspur) Distt- Bilaspur (C. G.) / 3)Amar Singh Baghel S/0- Asharain Baghel Aged about Slyears Consfable no. 281 2 BattaJ.iofcSpecialanned forces Sakari ( Bilaspur) Distt- Bilaspur (C. G.) 4)Raghvendra Rajoriya S/0- Rameshwar Prasad Kajariya Aged about 32 years Constable no, 677 2 Battalion Special armed forces Sakari ( Bilaspur) Distt-Bilaspur (C.G.) /^)Ashish KifflBr Tripafhi S/0- Prabhu Dayfl Trlpathi Aged abduf 28 'yesars Constable lio. 213 ' 2" Battaiioite^gcial anned 3^<;fe Sakari ( BtIa^tB-) Distf- BiIasR||l| (C. G£) £ :i 2 Y 6) Bidhichand Shanna S/0- Siyaram Sharma Aged about 28 years Constable no. 345 2 Battalion Special armed forces Sakari ( Bilaspur) — Distt- Bilaspur (C-iG.) VERSUS RESEfMENTS: llriioa of-India Tfirough- The Secrefary Ministry df Persomiel Public Grievances Depot New Delhi /.2) State ofChhattisgarfi?:y, Through- the Secretary -s- Home Department (Poliee) D. K. S. Bhairan, Raipur (G. G.) State of Madhya Pra8esh Through- The SeGretary Home (Poliee) DepartmBnt Vallabh Bhawan, Bhbpal (M.P.) The Director General of Police Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) J The Director General of Police Madhya Pradesh Bhopal (M.P.) 6) Coimnandant 12 Battalion, Sakari Distt- Bilaspur (C.G.) RII :B wRrrpETni That the petitioners begs to subiBit^as ^uiider XI-HC-78 \iwwtiflic'iff;B>-CTl?M<i<»,°Rirti<dy< ^^ ...CL)^£:^S^./...... IB^BT^TT^ """"•"""""""""/"?•"• 3iTtsisCH?p'(^fgg5) 26 w^wo^ sn^sTtpi&'ii* ?T2<T3II^STg>triiR ^-. s^ffWir^fi?Tan^?r courlsel 4-5-2005 j On a mention being made, Mr. Virendra Sharma, l^r'. Raghwendra Pradhant respondentNo.l ; Mr. Akhii Agrawal, Panel respondents No.2,4 & 6. Heord. The petitioners, who ar^ Armed Force, Sakri, have move|:l 227 of the Gonstilution of or9anization of the State, the^ Stateof Madhya Pradesh as thi of Madhyapradesh, being low hme allocated their services to no order has been paSsed, the they are working in the State of In the circumstances, that the petitioners may be respondent No.l throu^h respo^ic sgrvices to the State of oppearing for respondents No.l, ^he matter is taken up for hearing. for the petitioners. \[ Standing Counsel for|Union of India/ ^.awyer for the State of Chhattisgarh/ .fllKtIowill *1|*lOil'^fe><sl'(Rit+$tV (? iRSlf^I 3II^?T ;' ' • • • ' working in the 2 Battalipn Special this writ petition under Article 226/ tndid. Their case is' that after re- petitioners gave their option for the ^y are permanent residents of the State i(iid employees, the respondents ou9ht to ^he State of AAadhydPradesh, butso far |r allocation has not been decided.and Chhdttisgarh only. • courisel for the petitioners submits allowed to make a representation to ^idents No.2 & 3 for allocation of their Prodesh.to which learned counsel 2,4 & 6 have no objection. isatned iSpo^ident Mad^iya o XI-HC-78 oyci,*-''.) i*i i^i.wffi^tis,; RWI'M^ wtsafm^^W""'""""'^'"^ antsTflg'R-.t^ifg^); 27 3n^ST<iilR^i*; aansii^sfiRiitR c. Soma / c? 6 S^ J^ ^ m:' s^TWwf^ian^tT - 2J counslel Having heard leiirned facts ond cireumstances of the made by learned coynsel for the to make a representtttion to re; & 3. In the first instance,| representation to respondent No.| respondent N6.2 after receip^ respondent No.3 with iits eomme^ts of receipt of the representation, forward the Same to respondent three months thereof, and uItima^ely the recommendations pf pespond| petifioners should pass approprio^te thereof, in accordcnceiwith Idw. With the direetlons afores^iicf, In view of this order, M.W.)P also stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for <ni<ll»ili'''iiinl ^'l'SMil '(Rf+^if ^'Sri^ISII^T • ; for -the parties, havmg regard to the 4<xse and looking to the; limited request jaetitioners, the petitiQners dre allowed sp^ondent No.l through respondents No.2 the petitioners should make their •P with in one month fromtpday, in turn, of the same shall iforward it to within three months from the date |and in turn, resppndent!No.3 (^ain shall INo.l with its comments within another ', respondent No.l qfter considering id^nts No.2 & 3 and theirequest cif the order wjthin another three months icf, the petition stands disposed of. 3.No.254/2005and I.A.No.617/2005 ce^t-ified copyof this order. c.^ ^vy^ Ifll