1 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.415 OF 2009 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1115 OF 2007 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.34 OF 2007 IN ARBITRATION REFERENCE NO.42 OF 2004 Smt.Sonal Pratik Sanghvi. ...Appellant Vs. 1.M/s.Labh Investments & ors. ...Respondents. --- Mr.U.P.Warunjikar, for Appellant. Mr.G.R.Mehta, for Respondents. AND APPEAL NO.416 OF 2009 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1115 OF 2007 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.34 OF 2007 IN ARBITRATION REFERENCE NO.42 OF 2004 Mr.Pratik Suresh Sanghvi. ...Appellant Vs. 1.M/s.Labh Investments & ors. ...Respondents. --- 2 Mr.Y.P.Gandhi, for Appellant. Mr.G.R.Mehta, for Respondent no.1. Mr.U.P.Warunjikar, for Respondent no.3. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & R.V.MORE,JJ. DATED: 3rd May, 2010 P.C.: 1. Admit. By consent of parties, heard finally. By consent, orders dated 22.8.2008 and 4.7.2008 passed by the learned Single Judge in Chamber summons no.1115 of 2007 are set aside. The chamber summons is remitted back to the learned Single Judge for denovo consideration and decision in accordance with law. Considering that it is a matter of execution of money decree, the learned Single Judge who is dealing with the chamber summons, is requested to take chamber summon for hearing at an early date. Appeals are disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (R.V.MORE,J.)