WP(C) 6393/2003 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N. KOTISWAR SINGH Heard Mr. U.K. Nair, learned counsel appearing for the petitione r and Mr. M. Choudhury, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent No.6 as well as Mr. P.N. Choudhury, learned appearing for the respondent No.4. In the course of hearing, Mr. U K Nair pointed out having reference to p ara Nos.16 and 17 of the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the respondent No.4, t hat there was a proposal submitted by the petitioner himself for compromise on r epayment/liability with the bank and submits that in view of the above, perhaps the cause of action does not survive any further. Upon hearing the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the pa rties and going through the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the respondent No.4 , this Court is of the opinion that in view of the above stated position, the c ause of action to challenge the proceedings of the Ld. Debts Recovery Tribunal, Guwahati does not survive as the petitioner himself had admitted his liability a nd proposed for a compromise, and as such, the present writ petition virtually b ecome infructuous. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands closed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. The bank authority is at liberty to proceed with the matter in accordanc e with law.