IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No.383 of 2006 in First Appeal St.No.30259 of 2005 Maharashtra Krishna Khore Vikas Mahamandal ..Appellant vs. 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer No.22 Pune and others ..Respondents Shri U.B.Nighot for appellant. Smt.G.P.Mulekar A.G.P. for respondent no.1 Shri A.M.Joshi for respondent nos. 2 and 3 CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & Smt.NISHITA MAHTRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MAHTRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MAHTRE JJ. 5th February, 2007 5th February, 2007 5th February, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. 2. This is an application for condonation of 68 days delay. Smt.Mulekar appears for respondent no.1 and Shri A.M.Joshi appears for respondent nos.2 and 3. Both of them have seriously objected for condonation of delay. We have gone through the application for condonation of delay. The reason for delay has been properly explained. We also find that it is a public body and, therefore, we are inclined to condone the delay. Delay is condoned. The Civil application is disposed of. (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.)