1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9291 of 2009 BIKRAM KUMAR SON OF MUNESHWAR MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHHOTI PAHARI,P.S.AGAM KUAN,DISTT.PATNA Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.6602 of 2009 BITHAL MAHTO SON OF DINA MAHTO RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MEHANDIGANJ,P.S.MEHANDIGANJ,DISTT.PATNA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 6.5.2009 Since both the above applications arise out of one and the same police case, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. A supplementary affidavit has been filed in Cr.Misc.No. 6602 of 2009 mentioning therein that no case was registered earlier against the petitioner. The petitioners seek bail in a case which was initially registered for offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code on 29.9.2008 but later on that Section was converted into under Sections 395,397,412 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code vide order dated 4.12.2008. Allegation is that when the informant was going to his house in auto, in the way, he was fired upon by one person and he snatched the bag containing Rs.1,54,000/-. Submission is that the petitioners are not named in the first information report, they have not been put on test identification parade and no test identification parade was conducted with regard to seized currency note. Further submission is that the alleged recovered currency notes were not the robed amount and there is no explanation as to why the 2 petitioners and the currency notes were not put on test identification parade. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned court, Patna City in Bye Pass P.S.Case No. 59 of 2008. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)