C-78 ^wBf -<41«|«<4,y^|<M'|&, Rlrtl-Hy*; *11*1<*>| ^TT^ 311^91 SRlR-t wns^wssvtS 311^51 tRcp ('^tgERE) ^ 200 ?;RIT8R;frf^?f3n^ST W.t. (St Mo. 6^1/3008 PETITIONBR Rakes] Prasad of Infronl Distridt [i Kiunac' Tiwari, son of Late Samboo Tiwari, aged about 26 years, Residcnce Mahadeo Mafhpara, Ward No,9, of Home Guard Office, Kabirdhaxa, Kabudham, Chhattisgarh Bi*lha Versts KESPONDENTS l. 2. 3. eler Depart^aent Chief Water ChhatCss SB: HON. SHRJ DHIRBNDR^ 13-11-»)08 Shri P.S. Koshy, couns^ Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Heard. This petitioa is directed! 2, whereby the sendces of fhi Keeper, has been terminated LeaiTied counsel for tli orders have beea passed wii i|>l'i|fri'>i1'l H14dir<l''fs><) •(ful'tCK ^ari^Tan^T State | of Chhattisgarh, fhrougb.: Secretaiy, Water |Rcsoiuces Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipn4 Ctthattisgarh in Chief, Water Resouices Depart^aent, Raipur, Chliattisgarh pngineer, Mahanadi Godawari Kachar, Resources Departiaent, Raipiir, tat^isgarh Executpve Engmeer, Water Resources Deparljment, Kawardha Division, District Kabird|iam, Chliattisgarh WRIT PETmON <?NDBR ARTICa,E 226 OF THB CQSSIlJTUTIONOSraDlA MISHRA,J )l for the petitioner. <&ovt. Advocate for the State. |against the orders ofAnnexures P-1 3o P- i^ petitioner, wllo was appoiated as Tiaie (|>n the basis ofpolice verification report, ie petitioner submits that the aforesaid jhout aay opportiuuty of hearing to the ^'"•^:?'5;^^ .-.^ ^-^S^A^e^ |g5S?^l-t|p-78 a ^wf;:?iraT?'>?l, u>TTlti<id, Rrtitiy sn^ntpii^iitii nansn^STipmtR 3H^9TV (^cli^cl^i) tl'l^fd.'il'l t|l*1dT^'fet€t•((ult-CK ^3rf^*[3TI^n assigtuuig petitioner aad wifhout found on police verification. before the Engiaeer ResoTirces/respondent No.2, decided. On fhe ofher haad, the appeal of Annexure P-9 be decided withia a i^ceipt/production ofcopy In view of the above tlie instant petition is dispo1 No.2 to decide fhe appeal reasoned order withia two ofcopy ofthls order. aav reason as to what adverse was ^ven his appeal of Aanexure P-9 preferred l-io.-Chief, Department of Water is pendiag aad the same has not been ledmed peri(}d coiinsel for the State submits fhat ^referred by the appeUant/'petttioner shaU of two months froin the date ot order by tlie respondent No.2. tinission of leamed counsel for fhe State, led of with a direction to the respondent jif Annexure P-9 of the petitioner by a in<j>nths froni (he date ofreceipt/prodyction oftfhis sut>