IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6801 of 2008 Date of decision: 28.04.2009. Smt. Rajpali Petitioner Versus Rajpal and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.P.Chahar, Advocate for the respondents ***** S.D.ANAND, J. On a conjunctive perusal of the impugned order and also the clarification offered by the learned Presiding Officer, it is apparent that no order striking off the defence of the petitioner came to be passed by the learned Trial Court which, some how, proceeded to frame issues, the onus of a part thereof was placed upon the defendant-petitioner as well. It is obvious that since no pleadings had been filed by the defendant-petitioner, no issue could be inferred to have arisen out of the non existent pleadings of the defendant-petitioner and there was, thus, no question of placing of any onus upon him. The petition shall stand allowed accordingly. The parties, through their learned counsel, are directed to appear before the learned Trial Court on 7.5.2009, on which date the learned Presiding Officer shall proceed to pass whatever order is deemed fit in the circumstances of the case and in the context of the non filing of the pleadings by the defendant- petitioner. April 28, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge