IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO THOUSAND TEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19173 of 2002 Between: Gutike Nagaiah & others. … Petitioners And The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri K. Rammohan - Mahadeva This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19173 of 2002 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings of the first respondent in No.F1/2650/2001, dated 03.03.2001 as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and further declare the action of the third respondent in not disposing the revision filed by the petitioners dated 09.06.2002, as illegal, improper and further direct the third respondent to dispose of the revision dated 09.06.2002.” At the hearing, Sri Rammohan – Mahadeva, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the dispute raised in this writ petition is settled out of the Court among the petitioners and respondent Nos.4 and 5. The learned counsel passed on a copy of the compromise memo filed in A.S.No.8 of 2008 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District. In view of the compromise memo, the learned counsel says that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous by placing on record the abovementioned statement of the learned counsel. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.24097 of 2002 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 02.02.2010 ES