:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.892 OF 2009 NO.892 OF 2009 NO.892 OF 2009 Amol Mahadeo Nage ..Petitioner Vs. M/s.Dindayal Patsanstha Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Dani for the petitioner. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- V.C.DAGA,J. :- V.C.DAGA,J. :- V.C.DAGA,J. DATE DATE DATE : 9TH FEBRUARY,2009 : 9TH FEBRUARY,2009 : 9TH FEBRUARY,2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for petitioner. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order dated 6th June, 2008 passed by the Maharashtra State Cooperative Appellate Court, Mumbai, whereby the appeal came to be dismissed. 2. The factual matrix reveals that the petitioner had worked as agent, authorised to collect deposits from various depositors and to deposit the same with the Society. A dispute against the petitioner under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act,1960 was filed, which was very much tenable in the eye of law, petitioner being agent of the society. 3. So far as merits of the matter are concerned, the findings of facts recorded by the Courts below are based on evidence. No fault can be found with the :2: view taken in the impugned order. The entire matter is based on the appreciation of evidence. This Court not being a Court of appeal is not expected to reappreciate the evidence and substitute its own findings. As stated the view taken is a reasonable and possible view. The petition is devoid of any substance. The same is dismissed in limine. No order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)