IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2613 of 2008 JUHI DEVI, W/O KAUSHAL KISHORE JHA, R/O VILLAGE+P.O.-MADHUKARCHAK, P.S.+BLOCK- BIHARIGANJ, DISTRICT-MADHEPURA. ………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR, I.C.D.S., BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHEPURA. 4. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, MADHEPURA. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BIHARIGANJ, MADHEPURA. 6. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, BIHARIGANJ. 7. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, MADHUKARCHAK, BLOCK-BIHARIGANJ, DISTRICT- MADHEPURA. 8. RENU KUMARI, W/O SANTOSH YADAV, R/O VILLAGE MADHUKARCHAK, BLOCK-BIHARIGANJ, DISTRICT-MADHEPURA. …………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 01.04.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has wrongly been denied consideration by the Mukhiya for appointment of Anganwari Sevika on the ground that she does not come within the mapping area. He submits that new beneficiary areas were created and thus petitioner had come within the new area created. From Annexure-4 and 7, it appears that the petitioner has already filed her representation before the Collector, Madhepura. The writ application is, therefore, 2 disposed of with a direction to the Collector, Madhepura to consider the representation of the petitioner, hear the parties and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law preferably within a period of three months. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)