•'^. "? OF CHHATTISGARH AT >487 of20&7 'ETITIONER : Suresh Kumar Ve.rma agsd about 26 years S/b Desharam Veniaa, P.0. Village Uslapur, Block Sodla, District Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS ESPONDE.NT8 : 1. State of CMiattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department ofpandiayat & Social Welfare, D.K.S. ihavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Block - Bodla, Tahsil Kawardaa, District Kabii'dham (C.G.) 4. Chief Executive Ofncer, Janpad Panchayat Bodla, Tahsi! Kawardha, District Kabirdliam (C.G.) 5. Gram Panchayat BagSiarra, throusj'i - Sarpanch Village Panchayat Bogliarra, Block Bodla, Tateil Kav/ardha. District Kabirdliam (C.O.) 6. Rohit Kumar Sahu, aged about 27 years S/o Makhan Lal Sahu, PJ'O Village Bagharra, P/0 Podi, Talisi! Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) WMT PETITION 'UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CQNSTrTUTION OF INDIA Prese.nt: Shri D.R.Sfiamia. Senior Ad\-ocate with Miss Swati Shufcla, remment Advocate for flie State/responds Advocate tbrthe petitioner. Govei ,s ..1, No. 1 to 3. lit (Passed oa 13tl! day of Februar)', 2008) Leamed counsel appearuig for the petitioner, at this stage, does aot want to press this petition on merit, However, the petitioasr seeks perniissioa of this C'ourt to take recourse to altemanve statuton' rernedy, that may be avaiiabie to him, to whicli leame.d counsel appearing for the State has no objsction, It is ordered accordingly. Tlie psti'tion is dismissed vvith the above stated liberty. No order asto costs. -—— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge