THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.16454 OF 2007 ORAL ORDER: Admittedly, the petitioner’s authorisation was cancelled after conducting due enquiry vide proceedings of the respondent dated 8.11.2006. The petitioner states that against the said order, he preferred an Appeal and the same is pending before the Appellate Authority. This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondent in issuing a notification dated nil .7.2007 for making appointment of a fresh dealer in respect of the shop in question. A perusal of the impugned notice itself shows that application were invited only for filling up the vacancy on temporary basis. In the circumstances, I do not find any justifiable reason to hold that the impugned action of the respondent is either arbitrary or illegal. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ____________ (G. ROHINI, J). 2nd August, 2007. Kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.16454 OF 2007 2nd August 2007. Between: Smt. Y. Padmaja. .. Petitioner. And The Revene Divisional Officer, East Division, R.R. District at Malakunta Road, Goshmahal, Hyderabad. ..Respondent.