IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 19TH JULY 2011 / 28TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 18390 of 2011(W) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ NIZAR, S/O.MUHAMMED BASHER, AGED 39 YEARS, NIZAR MANZIL, KADAKKAL P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.ZIYAD SRI.SANU.S.PANICKER RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. S.I. OF POLICE, VENJARAMOODU POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695 001 2. C.I. OF POLICE, VENJARAMOODU POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695 001 * ADDL. R3:- S. GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR, KOCHUKARIKKATHIL VEEDU, MITHIRMALA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. *[ADDL. R3 IMPLEADED VIDE ORDER DATED 13/07/11 IN I.A.11250/11] ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN FOR ADDL.R3 SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR FOR ADDL.R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 18390 of 2011(W) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS. EXT.P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2:- TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE OF EXT.P1 SALE DEED. EXT.P3:- TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P4:- TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ W. P. C. No.18390 of 2011 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J The petitioner seeks police protection for himself and his employees for conducting tapping jobs in his property covered by Ext.P1 sale deed. The additional 3rd respondent with whom the petitioner is pitted in a legal battle in the regular civil jurisdiction has filed a detailed counter affidavit producing Ext.R3 series of documents. It is seen on going through the counter affidavit and the documents that in RFA.20/10 filed by the petitioner's assignor the petitioner sought for an injunction in respect of the property and that this Court has declined the injunction sought for. Today when the Writ Petition came up for hearing it was submitted by both sides that the parties are very seriously negotiating W. P. C. No.18390 of 2011 -2- for a settlement of all the issues between them. Under the above circumstances, we are of the view that no case is made out for issuance of the directions sought for in this Writ Petition. We dispose of the Writ Petition directing the Station House Officer, the first respondent to keep vigil over the subject matter of the dispute between the parties and to take appropriate action as is warranted, if any untoward incidents are reported to him. It is open to the parties to pursue their settlement talks and arrive at settlement if the same is possible. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE C. K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE kns/- W. P. C. No.18390 of 2011 -3-