mGxE 'n-IE amt-i court? 9F eagAeA ? U mir yEm'I N s no. or 201 ‘Ra’u’Ram :makur, I. Late‘r e iua ic urajpu (ca). annaa; 1- o hagwan magm au ait-39 Viear5 a‘ ost nd haiathaan, eh5ii» arguj i'a gstritt sa 1) Staté Bf Chihattisarh, S e Dp B {C{§) M ‘ {2} f /' ( g Through egretary, Ag'a‘icuitur "eartment, 91K; S; hawan, Mantraiay, :Raipur ... x Directur Districti Raipur (“C.G)'. RSPONDENT$ E : Agricuiture, .. , y, ~r— raur (. ricuure Directarate of ’ kricu!ture 'Raipu C.. Aglt, 4) Additiana! rectar ~ ' Deuty i gruiur mbikapar, i’Di‘strict- Sarguj QQa f 6} Sub— ‘Divés’icna’! Agicuiturai Gmcar. urajpxér, QiSti'iCt-l’SargL-iéa (C.G.) ”\> Q 6; ,367/ sL 3mm m msRH A BILASPR ‘ w vp SO Shi Agd Vge— Boké Sr, B a Enkn aw , Ri Jhiimm, P a By T X iJcsnt'birectar Agnculgwe, Biiaspur, (3) ‘Diétict Biisp £16) ( ( «Di { g, r «($). (V {5) p Drectur, vkkte, ”a a (). ( i s . H N. ‘ l t1: > I > > \ l i y y ‘ 77 J,# ,r,.,,wml‘, TIHKER DIWAKER P §E : RGK’BLE MR. JHS’I‘ICE 2?.933Q19 Shri Surfaraz Khan, coun Shri Vivek Shanna, EL. f Counsel for The petition I o y m far the pefih'oner. the State. submits that emis of justice is permitted to make fresh be issued for decidirxg the 0 ' would be sewed, if the peh‘e' e representation and dtection SamE. On the other hand, Stat e ' 'o o ent. Be that as it may, in the eventuality of fiiing representation by the petitio r, it is expected from the competent authority to decide tie same stiictiy in accordance with 1aw.' It ismade clear that this Court has not expresse any opinion on merits and the conzelned authority is directed to decide the representation. of the petitioner in accordance with the law. ' i V With the above observatio:)., the petition stands disposed ‘ of. u Sdj- Pritinker Diwaker ‘ _? Judge ~ counsel apposing this yrayer submits that the present p n has been flied after an inordinate delay and under n circumstances, the petitioner can seek compassionate appoi _ 1 n d