Jl'R £ .^•W-Qp^ w c^ ?eT& «•IN TNE HIGH COIIRT t»FCHHATTISGARH. AT - BILASPUR WRITPETmON (S}fio. 6^^ 6F 2008 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Krishna Gopal Yadav, Aged about - 50 years S/o Shri Paras Ram Yadav Working as - Upper Division Teacher, At - Govt. Middle School Boys, Saida, Block - Takhatpur, District - Bilaspur R/o Bazar Chowk, Yadunandan Nagar, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C. G.) V E R S US : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur 2. The District Education Officer, Bilaspur,District - Bilaspur (C. G.) THeBlock Education Officer, Block - Pathariya, District - Bilaspur (C. G.) WRITPETITIONUNDERARTICLE2260FTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1] PARTICULARS OF THEPETITIONER^- As given above in the cause titleofthe petition. 2] PARTICULARSOFTHERESPONDENTS:- As given above in Ihe cause title of the petition. 3] PARTICULARS OF TME CAUSE/ORDER AGAINST Jfi/MICH THEPETITION IS BEING MADE: - 3. K^ !'}•::(" 1 1 N •Uw^^'tww'.wi'vmvw'sv. ^-t^Y^j^ $6 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BSLASPUR WRtT PETITION (S) N0. 6925 OF 2008 Versus Respondents Krishna Gopal Yadav State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRiT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IND!A (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri R.K. Kesharwani, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ^ 3. (Passed on this 1st day of iMarch, 2011) Learned courisel appearing for the petitioner submits that for the reiief sought for in this petition, the petitioner has preferred a representation on 1.11.2008 (Annexure P-6) to the respondent authorities before fiiing of this petition, but till date no decision has been taken. It is wel! settled principles of law that representation has to be decided as early as possible within a period of 3 to 6 months, particularly when the petitioner is claiming reliefs, which he is erititled to. Shri Shridhar, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that admittedly the District Education Officer, Bilaspur, has taken time more than permissible. However, the pending representation shall be decided asearly as possible preferabiywithin a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. In view of foregoing, nothing survives for adjudication in this matter. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Noorder asto costs. Sd/- Safish K.Agnihotri Judge ashok 'it ;j-<d