IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3087 of 2010 ====================================================== Megh Nath Ram (I.P.S.) Son of Late Bhagirath Ram, resident of village- Shankarbigha, P.S. Wazirganj, District Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Sri Anup Mukherjee Son of name not known to the petitioner, Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. Smt. S. Sidhu, S/o name not known to the petitioner, Departmental Enquiry Commissioner, Old Secretariat, Patna 3. Amir Subhani, Son of name not known to the petitioner, Special Secretary- cum- Home Commissioner, Old Secretariat, Patna 4. Sri Alok Rout, S/o name not known to the petitioner, Secretary, U.P.S.C. Dholpur house, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi- 110069 5. The State of Bihar .... .... Opp. parties ====================================================== with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3088 of 2010 ====================================================== Megh Nath Ram (I.P.S.) Son of Late Bhagirath Ram, resident of village- Shankarbigha, P.S. Wazirganj, District Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Sri Anup Mukherjee Son of name not known to the petitioner, Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. Smt. S. Sidhu, S/o name not known to the petitioner, Departmental Enquiry Commissioner, Old Secretariat, Patna 3. Amir Subhani, Son of name not known to the petitioner, Special Secretary- cum- Home Commissioner, Old Secretariat, Patna 4. Sri Alok Rout, S/o name not known to the petitioner, Secretary, U.P.S.C. Dholpur house, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi- 110069 5. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi . .... .... Opp. parties ====================================================== 14 30-11-2011 Heard the parties. On 20.9.2011, this Court noticed and recorded that in one of the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner, final order has been passed imposing a punishment of 10 per cent cut in Patna High Court MJC No.3087 of 2010 (14) dt.30-11-2011 2 pension for three years. It was not clear on that date as to what is the stage of another proceeding pending against the petitioner. Today, the parties are in agreement that in the other proceeding, a show cause notice has been received by the petitioner and from his reply filed today, it appears that he has already submitted his show cause yesterday. We expect the authorities to conclude the pending departmental proceeding in accordance with law at an early date, preferably within two months. The contempt applications are finally disposed of. sk (Shiva Kirti Singh, J) (Shivaji Pandey, J)