1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE.M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE.S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P.(MD)No.631 of 2011 M.Palanichamy : Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Sanarpatti Police Station, Sanarpatti, Dindigul District. 3.Balamurugan 4.Siva : Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to direct the first and the second respondents to produce the body or person of the petitioner's wife, namely, Mariammal, aged about 40 years, before this Court and set at her liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Karuna For R.1&2 : Mr.A.Ramar Addl.Public Prosecutor For R.3&4 : Mr.Karuppasamy Pandian ORDER [Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN,J.] This Habeas Corpus petition has been filed, by the husband of the detenue, praying that this Court may be pleased to direct the first and the second respondents to produce the detenue, namely, Mariammal, aged about 40 years, before this Court and to set at her liberty. 2. It has been stated that the detenue has been kept under the illegal custody of the third respondent. However, from the status report filed by the second respondent, dated 15.09.2011, it is seen that the detenue had eloped with one Kennady, son of Sundarraj. Having stayed with https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 him for about six months, she had eloped with one Jaya Gandhi, son of Palani. It has also been stated that the detenue and the petitioner have been in the habit of borrowing loans from various persons, as well as from financial institutions. Thereafter, they had not repaid the said loans. In order to evade the repayment of the borrowed loan amounts, the detenue is hiding herself in the house of a relative and the said fact is also known to the petitioner. 3. In view of the above, this Court is of the view that no further orders are necessary in the present Habeas Corpus petition, as it is found, prima facie that the detenue is not in the illegal custody of the third respondent, as alleged by the petitioner. Hence, this Habeas Corpus petition stands dismissed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Accounts) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Sanarpatti Police Station, Sanarpatti, Dindigul District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1. CC to Mr.V.Karuna, Advocate, SR.No. 40911 ssm Order made in H.C.P.(MD)No.631 of 2011 Dated:- 21.11.2011 TR : 07.12.2011: 2p/5c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/