IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14679 of 2011 Pratik Kumar Singh Versus Yogendra Bahadur Singh ---------------------------------- 02. 08.09.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This application has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 8th June, 2011 passed by 5th Additional Sub Judge, Bhabhua in title suit no.90 of 2003 whereby the learned Court below on the application of the defendant- respondent allowed to depute police force for the purpose of boring and installing a hand pump. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has got no objection that the hand pump may be installed but there should not be any damage to the window or the doors of the building and in fact, the petitioner had agreed to allow the respondent to install the same but by making false allegation, the respondent got the police force deputed and the petitioner do not want that police should go to the house of the parties. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that there is long history in the case and the learned Court below considered one after other each of the order passed by the trial court as well as High Court in either Civil Revision or writ application. The learned Court below also observed that 2 since 2005, the respondent is trying to install a hand pump but still after expiry for 6 years, the same could not be installed and, therefore, to prevent any bloodshed and to prevent the breach of piece on the spot, the learned Court below allowed for deputation of police force. In such view of the matter, in my opinion, it is not a fit case where supervisory jurisdiction should be exercised. Accordingly, I find no merit in this writ application and thus it is dismissed. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)