IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 4294 of 2008 Between: M/s. Novitas Infotech, a partnership firm, Having its office at Plot No.1, Road No.76, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500 033 rep. by its partner Mrs. Karunasree, W/o. Sri Dharmender Varada, aged 35 yrs, R/o. Flat No.306, Royal Court, Road No.11, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 M/s Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, a Government of Andhra Pradesh Undertaking, 6th floor, Parishram Bhavan, Fateh Maidan Road, Basheerbagh Hyderabad - 500004 rep. by its Managing Director. 2 The Zonal Manager (Projects), Special Projects Zone, M/s Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, a Government of Andhra Pradesh Undertaking, Industrial Estate, Visakhapatnam - 500007. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to grant an order, direction or writ, more so the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the actions of the respondents in issuing the impugned notice dated 20.02.2008 bearing No. CGM(E)/APIIC/VSP/IT-Hub/N1/2007-08 canceling the lease allotment to the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violative of Article 14 and 19 of Constitution of India and principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and direct the respondents to execute deed of lease pursuant to the allotment letter dated 29.10.2007 bearing No.CGM(E)/APIIC/VSP/IT-Hub/N1/2007-08 in favour of the petitioner with regard to the plot no.7 with an extent of 1 acre in the IT/ITES SEZA at Hill 2, Survey No.408/1, of Madhurawada Village, Visakhapatnam Rural. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.R.RAGHUNANDAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: (SC FOR A.P.I.I.C.LTD.)K.V.SIMHADRI The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.4294 of 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter, dated 25.11.2008, to the Registry stating that the petitioner intends to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 26.11.2008 v v