IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4596 of 2010 RAJIV KUMAR, Son of Sharavan Singh, R/o Kanchanpur, P.s. Budupur, District Vaishali ………… Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ………. Opposite Party ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No. 1, Advocate For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, A.P.P. ----- 4 01.04.2010 A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Let it be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 394 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that one person after the occurrence was apprehended by local villagers at a different place, i.e, other than of the place of occurrence. He allegedly had disclosed the name of this petitioner and on that basis the petitioner has also been named in the first information report. However, it is stated that no any incriminating article, from the possession of the petitioner, has been recovered. Though the petitioner is in custody since 27.8.2009, he has not been put on any T.I. parade . - 2 - In the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, RAJIV KUMAR, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Sadar (Ganga Bridge) P.S. Case No. 289 of 2009, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be his father. If, after his release in this case, the petitioner is again found implicated in similar nature of cases, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)