IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 25122 of 2005 Between: 1 Manchala Pentaiah, S/o.Gangaiah, R/o.Godumakunta Village, Keesara Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 2 Nukalakunta Bhoopla Reddy, S/o.Ram Reddy, R/o.Keesara Dayara Village, Keesara Mandal , Ranga Reddy District. 3 Manchala Swarupa, W/o.M.Pentaiah, R/o.Godumakunta Village, Keesara Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Station House Officer, Keesara Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 3 The State of A.P., Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 4 B. Hemalatha @ Jyothi D/o. Chandra Reddy Godumakunta Vg., Keesara Mandal, R.R. District R4 is impleaded as per court order dt. 28-11-2005 in WPMP 32526 of 2005 .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to Cr.No.238 of 2005 of Keesara P.S. Cyberabad District and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.C.V.BHASKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Mr.S.Rama Sarma. The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioners seek a writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to Crime No.238 of 2005 of Police Station, Cyberabad District and quash the same. It is stated that after completion of investigation in the said crime, the case has been referred as ‘civil in nature’. In the circumstances of the case, since the said crime has already been referred as ‘civil in nature, nothing survives in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed as infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:04.03.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRR}