THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.24057 of 2009 ORDER: The 4th respondent is a Member of the Aadi Andhra Field Labour Co-operative Society Limited, the 3rd respondent herein. She was allotted an extent of Acs.2.00 of land. The petitioner is the daughter of the 4th respondent. According to her, the 4th respondent had gifted Acs.2.00 of land to her daughter, at the time of her marriage, and on a consent given by the 4th respondent, the land is now recorded in her favour, be it, in the records of the society and any other records. The 4th respondent raised a dispute before the 2nd respondent, as to the enjoyment of the said property. It was pleaded that she never gifted the property in favour of the petitioner. The case was taken up as Arbitration Reference No.200 of 2008-09 by the 2nd respondent. He passed an award, dated 25.11.2008, holding that the 4th respondent continues to be the owner of the property and that the petitioner has no claim upon it. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed O.A.No.22 of 2009 before the A.P. Cooperative Tribunal, at Vijayawada. She has also filed M.A.No.8 of 2009 for stay of operation of the award passed by the 2nd respondent. Initially an order of interim stay was granted on 20.02.2009. However, the stay was vacated on 17.09.2009. The same is challenged in this revision. Heard Sri T.Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Cooperation and Sri P.Sriramulu Naidu, learned counsel for the 4th respondent. The 2nd respondent recorded a finding to the effect that the 4th respondent did not transfer the land allotted to her in favour of the petitioner. Aggrieved by the award, the petitioner availed the remedy of appeal. The order of interim stay was granted by the Tribunal, and thereafter, it was vacated. If the petitioner is dispossessed from the land, the very purpose of preferring the appeal would be defeated. At the same time, the interests of the original allottee, who is none other than the mother of the petitioner, need to be taken into account. Hence, it is directed that pending disposal of the M.A.No.8 of 2009, the petitioner, on the one hand, and the 4th respondent, on the other hand, shall be entitled to share the benefits arising out of the land in equal shares, and the 3rd respondent-Society shall ensure that the benefits are distributed accordingly from January, 2010 onwards. The Tribunal shall endeavour to dispose of the appeal as early as possible. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of, modifying the impugned order to the extent indicated above. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.21.04.2010. GJ