4g “WA/g,(557 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No.131 8 /2005 §M§§E @‘fi‘mw $ Petitioner ix ttM~ Paduman Lal Shukla aged 60 years son of Brijnandan Shukla, resident of viilage Dhongdarha, Tahsil & Disst. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS Respondents 1.> Board of Revenue through Se'Cretary Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. State of Chhattisgarh through Collector, Korba (C.G.) 3. Nirbhedas son of Kolu Das, Caste Panika, Dubraj Singh son of Chran Singh, Caste Kanwar, 5. Komal Singh son of Manohar Singh, Caste Kanwar, Qy‘é /6. Sumran-Singh son of Manohar'Singh, Caste Kanwar, } 7. Dhan Singh son of Manohar Singh, Caste Kanwar, all resident of village Dhongdarha, Tahsil & Disst. Korba (C.G.) 8. Collector, Korba (C.G.) 9. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Korba (C.G.) 10. Tahsildar, Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226\fé27 OF THE OONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI QUO WARRANTO, PROHIBITION AND I OR ANY OTHER WRITI ORDERI DIRECTION ON THE SAME NATURE IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE @ ¢ @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1318 OF 2005 Paduman Lal Shukia Versus Board of Revenue through Secretary, Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh, Biiaspur and others, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTlTUTlON OF INDIA (Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri N.K. Agarwal, J.) Present v: None forthe petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents No.2,8,9 & 10. RESPONDENTS ORAL ORDER (Passed on 215‘ day of January, 2911) None for the petitioner. 2. The matter is oalled twice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. i Sd/- i N.K.‘ Agrawal Judge