IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 540 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 540 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 540 OF 2008 Sevaram Ratiram Agarwal .... Petitioner versus Veena B. Thadani & other...... Respondent. Mr. Charanjeet Chandraoal for the petitioner Mr. A.P.Mundargi with Ms. Deepa Pahuja & Mr. Niranjan Mundargi for Respondent no.1. Ms. A.A.Mane APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 17TH MARCH, 2008 DATED; 17TH MARCH, 2008 DATED; 17TH MARCH, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. By the present writ petition, an interlocutory order passed by the Additional Sessions judge dated 15-2-2008 granting stay to the order of issuance of process, until further orders has been challenged. As the revision is very much pending before the Sessions Judge, I decline to entertain the writ petition directed only against an interlocutory order. At this stage, the learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that in paragraphs 14, 15, 16, and 19 allegations are made against the Sessions Judge. The objectionable statements made in those paragraphs being wholly ill-founded and without any substance, need to be deleted. The learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to delete all the objectionable statements against the Sessions Judge made in the petition. The undertaking is accepted. The statements be deleted within three days from today. In the result the writ petition is summarily dismissed. ....