IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.: 6318 of 2008. Decided on: 29.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Sant Lal. … Petitioner. Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Akhtar Hussain, Advocate vice Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Petitioner is aggrieved by the issuance of office order dated 29th November, 1995 (Annexure PC). Admittedly, the petitioner has not filed the statutory appeal against the same. However, in the interest of justice, the petitioner is permitted to file an appeal against this office order within a period of three weeks from today. Thereafter, the appellate authority, i.e. the Managing Director of the respondent- Corporation shall decide the same by passing a speaking/reasoned order, within a further period of two months after the production of certified copy of this order. It is made clear that while considering the appeal, the question of limitation will not be taken into account. In other words, the appeal filed by the petitioner shall be treated within limitation. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 29, 2010. (sck).