1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA, PANAJI­GOA CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 16 OF 2004 1. The Land Acquisition Officer Dy. Collector, Collectorate office, South Goa, Margao. 2. Government of Goa, Through Secretary Tourism, Secretariat, Panaji, Goa. 3. The Director of Tourism, Directorate of Tourism, Government of Goa, Patto, Panaji­Goa. .... Petitioners Versus 1. Shri Narcinva S.V. Sinai Velingkar, 2. Shri Ramakant V.S. Velingkar, 3. Shri Atchut V.S. Velingkar, 4. Smt. Gomatibai Velingkar, All residents of Aquem, Margao, Goa. (since deceased represented by her legal heirs) 4a. Mr. Jayant Venctexa Poi Bhale major of age, Businessman and his wife 4b. Mrs. Kishori Jaiant Poi Bhale, both residents of E2 Adarsh Coop. Society, Caranzalem, Ilhas, Goa, 403 002. 4c. Dr. Gurudas Poi Bhale alias Gurudas Venctesh Poi Bhale Medical Practitioner and his wife. 4d. Alka Gurudas Poi Bhale both residents at Shubham Faleiro Bagh, Mungul Grande, Margao, Goa Pin 403 801. 2 4e. Dr. Satishchandra Venktexa Poi Bhale alias Satishchandra Venktesh Po Bhale Medical Practitioner and his wife. 4f. Mrs. Sulaksha Satshchandra Po Bhale, both residents at Amar Pali, Block No. 25, 3rd Floor, Atmaram Borkar Road, Panaji, Goa 403 001. 4g. Miss Sandhya Venctexa Poi Bhale, Daughter of late Venctexa Poi Bhale, housewife, Unmarried, resident of E2, Adarsh Cooperative Society, Caranzalem, Goa 403 002. .... Respondents Shri S.R. Rivankar, Government Advocate for Petitioners. Shri M.S. Usgaonkar, Sr. Advcocate with Shri I. Aga, Advocate for Respondents. CORAM: P.V. KAKADE, J. DATE: 18th August, 2006 ORAL JUDGMENT Heard learned Counsel for both the parties. Perused the record. 2. It appears that by order dated 11/08/2006, Civil Revision Application No. 26 of 2003 came to be allowed, wherein the question was determined as to when the possession of the acquired property was taken by authorities under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act. 3 3. The issue already decided in the Civil Revision Application No. 26 of 2003 would have bearing over the issue involved in the present revision application, so as to determine the quantum of interest amount to be payable. No doubt that the question of liability to pay interest after deposit is made, also is raised in this application which should be, in my considered view, left open for agitation. 4. Hence, in view of earlier judgment in Civil Revision Application No. 26 of 2003, the order dated 17/02/2004 is hereby set aside and the matter is remanded to the District Court, South Goa, Margao for hearing afresh the parties, and for making calculations of compensation amount and interest thereon payable to the claimants. The matter to be adjudicated within a period of 3 months from the date of this order. It is clarified that the issue regarding the question of payment of interest after depositing the compensation amount in the Court, is left open. With these directions the present Civil Revision Application stands disposed of with no order as to costs. P.V. KAKADE, J. NH