HIGH COuRT OF CHHAT-TISUARH AT BQASPUR WKIT PBTITIOM (Cl No. 938/2008 FETTTIOMERS Ku. Poouam Kumar and aaother versus RBSFOHuEnT-S State of Chtaatdsgad and others Order vost for 11 -4-2008 Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge HIGH COORT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiL.^FUR WR1T PETITION 'CS Ko. W.P. 938/2008 riBTlTiOniSKS 1. Poonam Kumari wife of Shanibhu K.uinar, scged about ^5 years, resident of Geetanjali Nagar, Sector -3, House No. 82, Raipur (CG) 2, Rajni Deinta, D/o Late Eniaituel Deinta, aged about 28 years, r/o Kanhaiynpiiri; Distt, Dui-g (CG) Versus RjRSPOSDENTS Sta.te of CIiIiattisgsiTli, ttlir?ugli ttie Secretaiy, De^rtineat of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawaji, Raipiir ri^tjt~^\ (CG) ^. Fanait KavisJianKaT Ktiufcla Uruversity, Raipur (CG) fhrough; the Registrar, Paadit Ravishaukar Shukta Uuiversity, Rainiir ICG} 3. The Principal, Pragati CoUcge, Centrai Avenue Choubey Colony, Ralpur (CG) 4. Tlic Pi-iucipal, Ritugta CoUege of ycience ana I'ec&nology, Kuagta E-ducstioiisl C-32I1T3US. Q. E-. Rosjdl. Uanjpara, uurg (CU) Present :Siui P.P. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner, SIiri Susiiil Dufcey. Qoyt. A<ivoca.te for tb.e Sts.te* Shri Vinay Paudey, Advocate for Pt. Ravi Shaakar Shukla Un•iveTSiitv- WRn PETnION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTuTiON OF INDIA O R D ER 11-4-2008 SB;_.HUN''BLE SHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRA.J Counsel for the petitioners subnuts that identical inatter bearing W.P.(C.) No. 871/2008 (Vishnu Prasad aad others -v- Slate of CJlliattisgaT.tl aud ofhers) i&volviag fhe similar question has been aUowed bv order dated 9-4-2008 aud simuar orders inay be passecl ui ttus niatter also. Learuecl counsel tor tlie responaents ao not oppose me above prayer. Accordiagly, the instant petition is allowed iu terms of order passed ia ~W.P.(C) No. 871/2008 dated 9-4-2008 aad it is directed fhat Uie petitioners shau be permitted to continue their studies in the iustitution and they shaB also be auowed to appear ia B.Ed. examiaation for 2007-08. _—— Sd/- Dhu-endraMishra Judge