IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.838 of 2011 ============================================= Ragho Singh, s/o- Satyendra Singh, r/o- Bhabua Ward No. 20, P.S.- Bhabua, District- Kaimur (Bhabua). .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ============================================= Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ============================================= 4 21-09-2011 Although the matter has been listed under the heading “To Be Mentioned”, this Court permitted the parties to make submissions on merit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. This is repeat application filed on behalf of the petitioner who has been declared juvenile in conflict with law seeking bail in a case instituted under Sections 364 and 120B of Indian Penal Code. His earlier application seeking bail was rejected by this Court vide order dated 3.11.2010 (Annexure-1) with the following observation: “This Court, however, grants liberty to the petitioner to renew prayer for bail in the Court below itself if all the prosecution witnesses are not examined within 07 months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in the Court below.” Status report was called for in this case. The report is at Flag-A. It appears therefrom that till today, no witness on behalf of the prosecution has been examined. Learned counsel submits that another co-accused (a juvenile), who is similarly placed, during the pendency of this application, has been released by this Court by order dated 16.3.2011 (Annexure-3). Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the liberty granted under order dated 3.11.2010 and in the light of status report, I am persuaded to direct release of the petitioner on bail. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Juvenile Justice Board, Kaimur (Bhabua) in connection with Juvenile Trial No. 226/202 of 2010/2011 (arising out of Bhabua P.S. Case No. 540 of 2009 (G.R.No. 1957 of 2009) subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors shall be father/mother of the petitioner. (ii) It shall be the duty of the father/mother of the petitioner to keep guard on him and to ensure that petitioner does not fall in the company of criminal. The bailor shall also ensure his personal appearance at the trial when directed therefor. In case of default in such appearance, the Trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (iii) During the subsistency of the application, if the petitioner found involved in any other criminal case, the same shall be a breach of the condition of bail entailing cancellation. PANKAJ KUMAR/- (Kishore K. Mandal, J)