HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl No. 2939 of 2007 PETiTIONER RESPONDENTS B.D. Nirala S/o Shri Sukhen Nirala, Age about 48 years, U.D.T., Shedual Csste Girls Ashramshala, Odkakan Block- Bilaigarh, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State Government of Chhattisgarh, Through:- Secretary, Education & Triba! Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Asstt. Commissioner, Tribai Welfare Department, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Biock - Bilalgarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) WR1T PETITiON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF JNDiA Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State / respondents. (Passed on 10th day of May,2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the faet and question of iaw invoived in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2008 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Learned counsel appeanng for the respondents does notcontrovert the said submission. 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The State Govt of Chhattisgarh and another) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Dipioma in Education Examination, it was ciarified that the nomenclature of the Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesft Kumar Verma vs. The Stats Govt of Chhattisgarh and another) (Supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired D.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge