IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 170 OF 2011 Vilas Shrawan Patil ..... Applicant V/S. State of Maharashtra & anr. ..... Respondents Mr. S.R. Chitnis, Senior Counsel i/by. Mr. Nitin Sejpal, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. A.A. Mane, APP for State-respondent no.1. Mr. A.H.H. Ponda, i/by. Mr. N.N. Patil, Advocate for respondents no.2 to 8. CORAM :- Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. 4th July, 2011. P.C. :- 1. When it is pointed out by the learned counsel for respondents no. 2 to 8 that the order dated 13th July 2009 of the Sessions Court granting anticipatory bail to these respondents ceased to exist on account of the regular bail granted to these respondents, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw the application stating that the applicant would file an appropriate application for challenging the regular order of bail. Application allowed to be withdrawn. [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J]