1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA M.C.A. No.193 of 2010 and M.C.A. No. 394 of 2010 and Stamp 2917 of 2009 and Stamp No.2919 of 2009 in Writ Petition No.412 of 2006 Liquidator, Goa Daman and Diu Co operative Fisheries Federation Ltd., Panaji .... Applicant V e r s u s Shri Krishna Laximan Harmalkar and two others. .... Respondents Mr. G. Nagvekar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. L. Ragunandan, advocate for the Respondent no.1. CORAM: A. P. LAVANDE, J. DATE: 27TH AUGUST,2010. P.C: Heard Mr. G. Nagvekar, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. Mr. L. Ragnunanadan, learned counsel waives notice on behalf of legal representatives of respondent no.2 and undertakes to file vakalatnama on their behalf. 2. By this applications the applicant seeks condonation 2 of delay of 1128 days in brining the legal representatives of respondent no.2 on record and seeks setting aside of abatement in so far as respondent no.2 is concerned and leave to bring the legal representatives of respondent no.2 on record. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I am satisfied that the applicant has made out a case for condonation of delay of 1128 days. Accordingly, all four applications are allowed. Delay in brining the legal representatives of respondent no.2 on record is condoned, abatement is set aside and the legal representatives of respondent no.2 are permitted to be brought on record, subject to the applicant/appellant paying cost of Rs.1000/- (Rupees one thousand only) to the respondent no.1 within a period of four weeks. Amendment to the cause title to be carried out within a period of four weeks. 4. All the four applications stand disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J.