Civil Revision No. 3061 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3061 of 2011 Date of Decision: 23.5.2011 *** Daljit Singh & Anr. .. Petitioners Vs. Sushil Kumar & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. Sanjeev Pandit, Advocate for the petitioners. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. In a suit for permanent injunction filed by the petitioners against proforma respondent No.3, on an application filed by respondents No.1 and 2 under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, they have been impleaded as defendant in the suit. Heard. The suit was filed seeking the relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering in the usage of property detailed in the head note of the plaint. It is evident from records that the applicants produced necessary proof i.e. registered sale deed dated 25.8.2003 to show that the property in dispute was purchased by them and were given the possession of the suit property. Hence, finding that respondents No.1 and 2 are the necessary parties, their prayer for being impleaded as defendant has rightly been allowed by the Court below. Dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE May 23, 2011 Jiten