y •• II; (. HiGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE&HHATTISGARIH : B8LASPUR DIVJSIONBENCH CORAM : HON'BLESH^JAGDiSHBHALLA,Ag.C.J. HON'BLE SHW T.P. SHAREVIA, J. PETiTIONER W.P.N0.17460FS004 1 Y.KjVerma, S/o Late Shri M.L. Verma, Ageb about 62 yeam Occupation - Retd. D.E., Depeirtment of Teieoommuhication, Bilaspur, R|fo Sarju Bagicha, Masanganj!, Biiaspur|(CG.) Versus ; RESPQNDENTS 1. ShriiAK. Qokakh Seci"etary,| I^inistry of Telecommunication, Cha|rman, |Te!ecom Go\4:. of India and Commission,Door 2. 3. Sanbhar Bftawan, N^w Deihi. ShrlK.G. Kulkami, i Member (Service) and D.G; Teiecom Boardj Door Sanc^ar Bhaw^n, New Deihi. Central Administrativi^Tribunal, JabalpurBenoh, CircMitCamp, Biiaspur Through its Registra4 Writ petition under Articies 226/227 of the Constittlition of india. :I Present: Shri Amrito Das, counsef for the petitioner. j, ORALORDER (Passed on 1SmJatiyary, 20C®) The^foliowing oral order of the Court was Hon'bte Shri Jagdish Bhalla, Ag. C.J. Learned counse! for the petitioner infbrmedj Appiication. of the petitioner was allowed by the Tribunai. However, the compiiance has not been camecl thepetitloner has filed Contempt Pstition whioh was speaking order. Therefore, the petitioner seeks iiberty Administrative Tribunal for clarification / modification of order passed by the Tribunal is enforced and does paperbasket. We find fbrce in the argument of counsel Accordingly, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach pjassed by; ndt fhat the Origjna! Centrai Administrative out^tilldate though Jrejected by a non- to approach Centrat order so that the goLsnto|the waste the for jthe petitioner. the Tribunalwithin ^J two weeks. if any! such application is Imoved by the petitloner it shai! be decided on merit. With this obsen/ation, writ petitioni stands disposed of. - Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^^