HIGH COURT OF CHtiATTISGARH: BlLAsPUR wn‘t Petitien (S! Ne. $237 o! 39g Present: 8hr. Smt. Sunéta Satyendra Jain, Sahu, Pane! eounsel Lawyer for forthe the State. petmoner ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 4‘“ day of August, 2008) With consent of reamed counset appearing for the parties, the matter is heard fmaily. This case pertains to grievance of non-grant of retirai dues. 3) This Court, in the matter of W.P.Noi4642i2004 (Baiinath Mandai Vs. The State of Chhatiisgarh & others) and other connected maners, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retria! dues as the disputed question of facts 2) i were invoived. The Committee was constituted by the State Govemment, pursuant to the order dated 19-06—2006 passed in W.P.No.1961!2006 (3mt. Keja Bai of Chhattisgarh and others), and order dated Chandrakar Vs. State Government £008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and others er) Thus‘ this petition is squareiy covered by the 1343 Vs Baiinath Manda! and anoth passed in WP‘No. 464212604 iudgment and order dated 315‘ January, 20% supra) ) as submitted by iearned counsei appearing for the (Baiinath Manda! ( “\\£rtie: ” \ Petitioner Jhumuk LaS Sahu, S10. Late Sahu, Aged about 66 years, RIO. Sorid Nagar, Dhamtari, Tehsi! & Distriet Dhamtari, CG. Versus Respgndents 1) State 'of C.G‘ thraugh the Acccuntant Genera, Chhattisgarh State, Pandri, Raipur; 0.6. 2) Trasury omcer, District Treasury, Dhamtari, CG. 3) Block Education Officer, Dhamtari, Diwict Dhamtari, GG‘ Article 226 of the Constitut'ton of India) (wm Petition under Article SB: Hon’ble Mr. Sa§sh K. Agnihotri, J. 4) This petition is accordmgly dispcsed of in the same terms i.e., the omce of the Advocate Generai is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a pericd of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shait issue notice to the petitioner and officers concerned wtthin a further period of 15 days. The Committee shat! consider and pass order‘ in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, inciuding payment of retirai dues, if any, to the petitioner. be compieted within a period of four montrs from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5) The petitioner shalt supply one compiete set of the petition to the State counsel as well as counsel for Union of lndia for transferring the same to the Committee. 6) ln case of grievance with regard to non-payment of pensionery dues, it is not necessary to file a writ petition before this Court directly. The representationlapplicetion can be moved before the Pension Committee as stated above, The Pension Committee shall not refuse to entertain the representation/application, if so filed directly. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sd/—