(/^^ /-oo^— IN TiIEHIGH C^URTLOJLJUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.t .cs.? Lme. WRIT P^TITION^No. x' {2006 K. r PETITIONER o' ^^ \\ <w% V-~-^7^^-- .. ^*'' ^'l" ''^••"~ •?••' -A^"' .-•f'' '^•- \^"" RESPONDENTS / -^A ^ ,^. ^^ ^'^6V' / ^ Dr. Sunil Puri Aged about 53 years S/o Shri Kishorilal Puri Formerly Director Instructions Indira Gandhi Agriculture University Raipur (C.G.) Presently Director Technical D/1 Oil Private Ud. Company 100, V.C.S. House, G.N. Mills Post-Coimbatore-641029 (Tamil Nadu) VERSUS State of C.G. Through the Secretary Department of Agriculture D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Through the Vice-chanceellor/ Registrar, Krishak Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) iKfli m t' ( K f;' •'i ilh1 ^3. Chancellor, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raj Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Dr.-^.S. Thakur Dean 85 Enquiry Officer, College of Agriculture, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur (C.G.) PE'nTIONUNDERARTICLE 2267227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OEL^APPROPRIATE WlliTS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FQR QTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS: HI6H COURT OF WHATTIS6ARH AT B1LASPUR Hon'bl®Mr, Satish K. Agnihotri. J, Petitioner' Respondents versus &r. Sunil Puri Stcte of Chhattisgarh & others Present: Shri Konak Tiwari, Senios" Advocute with Shri Jitendra Pali, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ajuja, &y. ©ovt.Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shri Prashant Mishra, Senior- Advocate with 5hri Sameer Behar, Advocate for the respondents No. 2 and 4. OR&ER ( 8th Ssptember, 2006) 1. Shri Kannk Tiwari, learned Senior counsel wi1+i 5hri Jitendra Pati, leaned counsel, appearing for- the petitioner submits that the dispute 'm question is pendifi9 consideration before the Charicellor' of the respondent/Uniyersity. Shri Prasant Mishra, learned Senjor counsel with Shri Saweer Behar, learn.sd counsel for the respondents No. 2 & 4 and Smt. Anju Ahuja, iearned Dy. 6ovt. Advocate have no objection. 2. In view of tiie above, -rtiis matter can be disposed of awaiting the decision of tiie Chancellor of the University. 3. For the reasons stated-above, this petition stands disposed of. However, in the meantiine, 1tie impugned enquir-y shall remain stoyed till tiie final decision of the Choncellor of the University. No order as to costs. Sd/- ^. SatishK.Agmhotii ,,Judge ;•',;. ^