C§;A/®7\/ / ® 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. B5 I OF 2009 PETITIONER /:’ Smt. Yogeshwari Sinha, W/o. Shri Kamlesh Sinha, aged about 35 ygars, Caste Kalar, Occupation Aangan Badi Karyakarta, R/o. Kohangatola, Tahsil Balod, Distt. Durg, (C. G.) Gram VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) , State of Chhattisgarh through Its Secretaly Woman and Child Development Department, D. K. S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Rajpur, (C. G.) 2) The Additional Collector, Durg, District Durg (C. G.). The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Balod, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (C. G.) The Project Officer, Integrated Child Development, Project, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (C. G.) The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Kohangatola, Tahsil Balocl, Distt. Durg, (C. G.) ' , WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION ‘OF INDIA PwnaNERM HEG§€ CQUKF OF SHHATHSGH A? BHLASPUR §%§em. Ma Ju$§ice $r§€§nk$r Qéwaaker; Wri£ Peiimn {8; No3. 3351 m 2W5» Smt. Yogeshwaré Sinha VERSUS State 0f Chhattfsgarh and others Shri Jitendra Gupta counse: for the petitioner. RE$§QNQERWS Thakur, Shri Yashwant PL fer the Singh respandents/State‘ Thakur and Shri Shashank WRJT PET§T§ON UMBER AR‘HCLE 22$ GF THE CON$TlTUf§ON 9F ’ lNDiA GRDER (13.07.2w9) 0f the counsei for the pariiee, the matter is heard At the om set, counsel far the petitioner submite ihat he may be permitted to witheraw this peh’tion with a direction $0 reseondent No.4 to decide %he two representations dated 7.1.2009 and 5.22099 which are aiready pending before ii. He furi petiiioner for about 10 menths has n is facing financiai hardship. Counsei for the respondents/State submits that if the pet makes a fresh representation it would be dec concerned expeditiousiy. Accordingiy, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with i aforesaid. it is directed that if the petitioner makes a repre within a peried of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy oit the same wouid be decided by the authorities concerned within finaHy. With ihe conseni her submits that‘the eatery of the ot been paid to her due to which she itioner ided by the authorities peried of three weeks from the date of its recei with iaw. iberty as u sentation his order, a further pt strictiy in accordance it is made ciear that no opinion on the mer expressed by this Court and t its of the case has been he authorities concerned shaii heMy to decide the representation strictiy in accordance ' with iaw. J' Sd/_ Rx, § i Pritinker Judge Diwaker