IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.23671 of 2009 Between: Chetti Geetha Rani ..... PETITIONER AND The Revenue Divisional Officer/Land Acquisition Officer, Siricilla, Karimnagar District and another ..... RESPONDENTS ORDER: Heard the counsel. 2. The matter is coming up for admission. 3. The Writ Petition is filed praying for the relief of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation dated 02-07-2009 of the petitioner which is made for payment of compensation for acquiring the house bearing No.1-81/A belongs to petitioner situated at Chintaltana village, Siricilla Mandal, Karimnagar District and not giving benefits under rehabilitation package is arbitrary and illegal and contrary to rights guaranteed under Article 300 A of Constitution of India and a direction may be issued to value the said house and pay the just compensation and benefit rehabilitation package or to pass such other suitable orders. 4. Several facts had been narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. It is stated that the mother of the petitioner viz., late Janamma, W/o.D. Prabhakar Rao was the owner and possessor of Agricultural land bearing Sy.No.236/A to an extent of Ac.1-07 guntas and Sy.No.234 to an extent of 16½ guntas and in Sy.No.215/A to an extent of 31 gts., totally Ac.2-14 guntas bequeathed in petitioner’s favour. The entire village i.e., Chintaltana is submerged in the Mid Manair Project. When the Land Acquisition Officers along with Surveyors have visited the village for purpose of assessing the values of the properties, which are going to be submerged petitioner name was not considered for compensation. Subsequently the petitioner filed a writ petition No.12589 of 2007 before this court and the same was dismissed with an observation. Pursuant to above a cheque was issued to petitioner dated 04-10-2008 towards compensation of Land but no compensation was given towards above said house and rehabilitation package to her family. It is stated that aggrieved by the same the petitioner made another representation to respondent No.2 dated 02-07-2009 requesting him to include her name in the list of families residing at Chintalathana village for rehabilitation package as well as compensation for above said house. 5. In the light of the facts and circumstances, this court is of the considered opinion that the writ petition may be disposed of directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 02-07-2009 in accordance with law within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J November 4, 2009. PN THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.23671 of 2009 November 4, 2009