1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 483/2010 ABDUL AZIZ ABDUL BARI AND ANOTHER VS. ASIF HUSSAIN MUNAF HUSSAIN AND OTHERS Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A.J.Kadu, Advocate, for the petitioner. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 08, 2010. Heard. In proceedings filed under Section 41-D in 2007, the petitioner wanted additional charges to be incorporated by amendment in view of alleged subsequent misconduct. The Joint Charity Commissioner has rejected that amendment after observing that the same are based on different cause and hence it would not be proper to allow such amendment. It is to be noted that if charges of misconduct are there and proceedings under Section 41-D is already initiated on those charges, the charges need to be investigated and proceedings need to be decided at the earliest in the interest of administration of public trust. If the subsequent event and charges of misconduct flowing therefrom are allowed to be added, the old proceedings may continue to drag on indefinitely and that could not be in the interest of trust. 2 In these circumstances, I do not find anything wrong with the application of mind by the Joint Charity Commissioner. Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed with no costs. Advocate Kadu states that proceedings in Application NO. 20/2007 need to be expedited. Looking to the nature of controversy, Joint Charity Commissioner to make an effort to decide the same as early as possible. Writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Rvjalit.