Q13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH w.P. No. g?§’a (zooy PETITIONERS PLAINTIFF :1; Jagjit Singh Saluja, aged 21 years 2. Jagprit Singh Saluja, aged 29 years Satyajit Singh, aged about 26 years Raja, aged about 18 years A11 S/o. Pratap Singh;Saluja R/o. Balbhadra Ward, Bhatapara Tahsil Bhatapara, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS . Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Bhatapara Tahsil Bhatapara, District Raipur ’ (C.G.) The Secretary Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Bhatapara Tahsil Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS : 1 DEFENDANTS WRITN PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF x CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2T50 af 2004 (Writ Petition under Articie 227 of the Constitution of indie) SB: Hon’bie Mr. Satish Kr Agnihotri, J. Shri Gautam Khetrapai, counsel for the petitioner. Shri P. Dutta, Advocate for the resb'ondente No. 1 and 2. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panei Lawyer for the respondent No.3, Present: ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 12‘“ day of August, 2008‘ Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on the basis of the report dated 5-1-2001 (Annexure PM), submitted by the Revenue inspector, Bhatapara to the Tahsitdar, Bhataoara, submits that the petitioner is in' possession of the disputed property. He further submits that the petitioner has tiled a suit for declaration of titie and injunction. 2) On query, asto who is in possession of the suit property, teamed counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1 and 2 says that the respondents No. 1 and 2 are in possession of the suit property. 3) Be that as it may, without deciding the question of possession, it is heid ithg’the status quo with regard to the possession of the suit property shail be Petitionei§ 1) Jagit Singh Saluja, aged 21 years. Maintiff 2) Jagprit Singh Saiuja, aged 29 years. 3) Satyajit Singh, aged about 26 years. 4) Raja, aged about 18 years, AH s/o. Pfatab Singh Saluga, Rio. Baxbhadra Wad, BhataparaJ Tahsi: _ Bhafapara, Distt. Raipur (CG). Versus Respqggents ’ 1) Krishi Upaj Mandi samiti Bhatapara, Tahsil Defendants Bhatapara, DEstrict Raipur (CG). 2) The Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Bhatapara, Tahsi! Bhabpara, District Raipur (CG). 3) The State of Chhaitisgarh, ihrough the Coilector! Distt. Raipur (CG). maintained tin the dispose! of the suit. pending consideration, may take steps to consider and decide the suit expeditiousiy. 4) in View of the above, the petition stands disposed of. Consequentiy, The Court below, wherein the $uit is M (W) P.No. 272412004 for interim relief aiso stands disposed of. ix i sw— Sau‘sh K. Agnihom‘ Judge /