IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4889 of 2010 DR.TEJNATH RAI SON OF LATE RAM NARESH RAI, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- KATIRA, P.S. ARA NAWADA, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. DIRECTOR-IN-CHIEF, HEALTH SERVICE, DEPART OF HEALTH, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 4. COMMISSIONER, GENERAL PROVIDENT FUND, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA 5. CIVIL SURGEON, SADAR HOSPITAL, BETTIAH (WEST CHAMPARAN) BETTIAH 6. ACCOUNTAT GENERAL, BIHAR, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA 7. DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, BETTIAH, WEST CHAMPARAN. ----------- 2 22.03.2010 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the District Provident Fund Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah as respondent no.7. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st August, 2007 from the post of Additional Chief Medical Officer while working under the respondent no.5, the G.P.F. and unutilized leave has not been settled as yet despite representing the matter. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.5. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid to the petitioner along with statutory interest, if any. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)