19.CA.3289.09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3289 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL [STAMP] NO.19058 OF 2009 Smt.Bismillahbi w/o. Papamiya and others. ..Applicants. Versus Sou.Pramila Arvind Ambekar and others. ..Respondents. ..... Mr.Arvind Purohit, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr.S.N. Chandrachood, Advocate for respondent No.1. .... CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATED : 4TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel Mr.Purohit for applicants and learned Counsel Mr.Chandrachood for respondent No.1. Though respondent Nos.2 to 5 are served, no one appeared on behalf of them when the matter was called out for hearing. 2. Present Civil Application is preferred by original defendant Nos.1 to 9 & 11 for condonation of delay in filing First 19.CA.3289.09 2 Appeal against judgment and decree dated 20th January, 2009 passed by the trial Court in Special Civil Suit No.1761 of 1995. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf respondent No.1 vehemently opposed the present Civil Application on the ground that the applicants failed to disclose the cogent reasons for condonation of delay. 3. Considering the reasons given in paras-5 & 6 of the Civil Application, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads as under : “a) The delay occurred in filing the Civil Appeal be condoned and the Appeal may be directed to be heard on its on merits." 4. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (K.K.TATED, J.)