1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION No. 1454 OF 2011 (Ranjit S. Parde .vs. Managing Director, M.S.Power Generation Co. Ltd. and Ors.) _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 08, 2011. Heard Mr.S.K.Verma, Adv. for the petitioner, Mrs.A.R.Taiwade, A.G.P. for respondent no.3 and Mr.A.D.Mohgaonkar, Adv. for respondent nos. 1 and 2. We find that the agency to which the job of selection was entrusted by the respondents had found that the petitioner, prima facie, fulfilled the requisite conditions and therefore, has processed his papers. Ultimately, he is also selected for recruitment. In this background, the employer has found fault with that agency. The employer contends that the petitioner is working as a Chemist and has got separate hierarchy for promotion. He has further stated that though the 2 petitioner may have a degree in Chemical Engineering, that degree or his working experience with that degree is not equivalent to an experience on the Generation side. Mr.S.K.Verma, Adv. is disputing this position. It is not in dispute that the name of petitioner figures in the select list and the persons whose names are below him have been given appointment. Petitioner has also produced a Certificate issued by the Establishment Officer of Respondents about the alleged experience on the Generation side. In this situation, we find that interest of justice can be met with by directing the competent Authority mentioned in the order dt.5.3.2011 to give the petitioner an opportunity of hearing and thereafter, if necessary, to remove his name from the select list by a reasoned order. Mr.S.K.Verma, Adv. has pointed out that this Court has vide orders dt.28.4.2011 reserved one post for the petitioner. We, therefore, direct the respondents to keep one post vacant till the petitioner is heard and appropriate further orders in this respect are passed by the competent Authority. The petitioner to appear before the competent Authority i.e. respondent no.1 at 3 Mumbai for the purposes of said hearing on 27th September, 2011 and the said Authority shall, thereafter, pass appropriate orders within a further period of six weeks. Till such orders are passed, the interim orders passed by this Court on 28.4.2011 to continue. With these observations and directions, we dispose of the petition. Copy of this order duly authenticated be supplied to the learned Counsel for the respective parties. JUDGE JUDGE jais