IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25081-2011 (O&M) Date of decision:19.08.2011. Sanjay ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Gorav Kathuria, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for grant of regular bail in a pending trial case registered vide FIR No.60 dated 11.03.2011, under Sections 364-A, 368 and 120-B IPC at Police Station NIT, Faridabad. The petitioner had earlier applied for bail vide CRM-M-22337-2011 in which after arguing at length, when the counsel for the petitioner found that he will not be able to persuade the Court for grant of bail, he prayed for withdrawal of that petition and the following order was passed on 26.07.2011:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition. Dismissed as withdrawn.” The present petition is filed just after about 20 days of the withdrawal of the earlier petition in which it is submitted that at the time when the earlier bail application was argued, learned counsel for the petitioner could not mention some facts. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the view that it is an act of overreaching the Court because learned counsel for the petitioner had argued in detail before this Court but was unable to convince the Court for the purpose of grant of bail, therefore, the earlier bail application was withdrawn in order to avoid any observation of the Court which could affect the merits of the case during trial. In view thereof, I do not find any merit in the present petition and the same is hereby dismissed. August 19, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE