IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.R. No.1387 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision 18.01.2011 Viney Kumar …Petitioner Versus Smt. Saroj Bala and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI -.- Present: Mr. B.S. Saroha, Advocate for the petitioner. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that learned trial Court had convicted the respondents under Sections 323, 325 and 342 IPC and sentenced to undergo for a period of six months but in appeal conviction/sentence of the respondents has been illegally upset. Having gone through the judgment and order dated 19.3.2010 passed by learned ASJ-I, Ambala, I find no infirmity in the same. Learned Appellate Court has relied upon the fact that once Naib Singh was not examined even though he was an eye witness, it was fatal to the case of the prosecution. Consequently, this petition is dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) January 18, 2011 JUDGE ashish