^^SiS^SSSt [IGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILA8PUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PE'nTION (S) No. 3987 of2U»7. Devendra Kumar S/o Late Shri Deolal, Aged about 58 years, Ex-Assistant General Manager, P. No. ~ 00221, Hmdusthan Steelworks Coiistroctioa Ltd. H.O.. at Kolkata, R/o BK - 6, Street - 17, Sector -10, Bhilai N^ar, Distt. •Durg. VERSUS : 1. Hindusthan Steelworks Consta. Ltd. ITirou^i: Chauinan-cwn-Matiagiag, 5-1, CoBMaissariat road, [Hasting], Kolkafa- 700022 2. Hindusfiian Steelworks Cocstmction Ltd., Throu^i: General Manager, P.0. Bhilai Distt. Durg [C.G.] WRTT PETITION UNDER ART1CLE 226 OF THE CONSnTUTION OF INDiA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satisto K. Agirihotri, J, Shri B.R.Ghoah, Advocate tbr the petitioner. Sliri P.S.Koshy, Advoeate for ths respondetits. QRALORUER (Passed on 03rt day of March, 2008) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been paid salarv of 28 months and turther seeks a direction to ttie authorities to allot altemative accommodation commensurate with letterdated 18.07.2002. It is an admitted case that the petitioner, while workme as Assistant General Manaeer at Bhadrawati Unit. Andhra Pradesh of Hindusthan Steelworks Construction Ltd. (fon6hort 'H.S.C.L.*) retired from service. The petitioner is entitledto airears ofsalary of28 months forthe period from April 2003 to July 2004 and March, 2005 to Pebruary 2006 when fhe petitioner was working at Bhadrawati Unit in Andhra Pradesh. The cause of action shown in this petition does not &11 within the territorialjurisdiction ofthe High Court ofClihattisgarh. Ifany cause of .-...lliiBa.uMrt.u'ai-su-.U.I action arises from fhe fact that the petitioner was working at Bhadrawati in Andhra Pradesh, the petitioner ougfat to have moved fhe High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad fbr appropriate relief. Thus, this petition is not maintainable in view ofthe fact that cause of action has not arisen here. 4. With re.aard to ailotment ofalteroate acconimodation, the petitioner has earlier fiied writ petition beins No. 1334/2007, wherein the contmuation iii the official accommodation allotted at Dura was imder consideration. The petition was disposed ofwith a direction that the petitioner shall not be dispossessed from the ofBcial acconmiodation allotted to himtiU 30 April, 2007. The petitioner was farflier directed to hand over peaceful asid vacant possession ofthe ofBeial aceommodation on or before 30 Aprii.2007, to the Bhilai Unit ofH.S.C.L. 5. The issue with regard to second prayer has ah-eady been considered and order has already been passed. Thus, the same issue eaimot be agitated again and again for rehearing in the High Court under Artiele 226 ofthe Constitution. 6. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as not maurtainable. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Ainxt