IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.196 of 2009 1. Most. Ram Singari, wife of late Kedar Singh son of Bajitpur, resident of Bajitpur, P.S. Gopalpur, District Saran(Chapra), and 2. Amarjeet Kumar son of late Ram Naresh Singh, Resident of Bajitpur, P.S. Nayagawan, District Saran… …Defendants/Petitioners versus 1. Sri Kant Singh s/o late Ram Prahlad Singh, 2. Umakant Singh s/o late Ram Prahlad Singh, 3. Amarnath Singh s/o late Ram Prahlad singh, 4. Punam Devi D/o late Ram Prahlad Singh, All residents of village Bajitpur, P.S. Nayagawan, District Saran(Chapra)…Plaintiffs/Opposite Parties … For the Petitioners: Mr. Rudal Singh, Advocate. … 3 09.02.2009 I.A. No. 681 of 2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This application has been filed for condoning the delay of about one and half months in filing of this civil revision application. For the reasons mentioned in this application, I.A. 681 of 2009 is allowed and delay in filing the present civil revision application is hereby condoned. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner in the civil revision application. - 2 - Defendants petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 15.09.2008 passed by the Munsif III, Chapra in Title Suit No. 63 of 1994, whereby the learned court below has allowed certain amendments in the plaint. It is submitted that the amendment petition has been allowed at a belated stage after several years of filing of the title suit. It is further submitted that the amendment changes the nature of the suit. The trial court on consideration of the facts came to the conclusion that the proposed amendment will not change the nature of the suit. Learned counsel for the petitioner also failed to point out in this revision also as to how the proposed amendment, by which certain facts are to be added and one alternative relief is also to be inserted, is going to change the nature of the suit. In view of the aforesaid, I do not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order passed by the court below. As a result thereof, this civil revision application is dismissed. - 3 - However, since it is a very old suit, the court below is directed to conclude the trial within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. SC (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)