SAS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.247 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.247 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.247 OF 2007 IN IN IN REVIEW PETITION (LOD) NO.15 OF 2007 REVIEW PETITION (LOD) NO.15 OF 2007 REVIEW PETITION (LOD) NO.15 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.402 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.402 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.402 OF 2006 Association of Allocated Government Servants from Ex-Madhya Pradesh & Hyderabad States ..Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.S.G.Deshpande h/f A.D.Kango for petitioner. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 10TH OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 10TH OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 10TH OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- Learned counsel holding for Mr.A.D.Kango seeks time. In our opinion, there is an increasing practice whereby, after dismissal of the main proceedings and against those orders, review petitions are being filed as a matter of course thereby increasing the workload of this Court, even though there is no arguable case. 2. In this matter, against the order of this Court an S.L.P. was preferred. The S.L.P. was - = : 2 : = - summarily rejected. After rejection of the S.L.P. the present review petition, that too after a delay of 155 days has been filed. 3. Apart from the fact that there is no cause shown, there is also no merit in the review petition. Hence notice of motion and Review Petition are dismissed. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)