1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 304 OF 2008 Kallappa Annu Koik & anr ........Appellants versus Smt. Akkatai Anhu Koik & ors......... Respondents. Mr. P.D. Dalvi for the Appellants Mr. Surel Shah for the Respondents . CORAM: R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 06th OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Dalvi the learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Shah for respondents. The appellants are the original defendant nos. 1 and 2. The suit filed by respondent no.1 for partition and separate possession was decreed by the trial court. The appellants challenged the above said decree by filing appeal before the lower appellate court. However by the judgment and order impugned in the second apeal the lower appellate court dismissed the same. Both the courts below concurretnly held that the appellant no.1 and respondent no.1 are entitled to ½ share each in the suit property. The suit property originally belong to Annu Koik and the respondent no.1 is the wife of Annu Koik and appellant no.1 is the son of Annu Koik. 2 2. In view of this I do not find any error in the finding recorded by the lawer court. No question of law much less substantial question of law arises and hence second appeal is dismissed. ( R.V. MORE, J.)