:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 134 OF 2008 Shri.Prakash Bhuralal Vyas ....Applicant V/s. Smt.Chandravali Bhuralal Vyas and Ors. ....Respondents. ====== None for the applicant/petitioner. Mr.H.J.Dedhia, PP for the state. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI, & SMT.RANJANA DESAI, & SMT.RANJANA DESAI, & SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATED: DATED: DATED: 24TH JUNE, 2008. 24TH JUNE, 2008. 24TH JUNE, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. This criminal revision application was on our board yesterday. The petitioner was not present. Since the petitioner was not present, we adjourned the matter to 24.6.2008. Today again the petitioner is not present. 2/. We have perused the impugned order carefully. The petitoners’ mother is 85 years old. She had filed application for maintenance from the petitioner. That :2: :2: :2: order was allowed and the petitioner was directed to pay Rs.1500/- per month from the date of the application to his mother. He was also directed to pay Rs.1,500/- towards the costs of litigation. The said order is challenged in this criminal revision application. After perusing the order carefully, we are of the opinion that the learned Judge cannot be faulted for having passed an order of maintenance. It appears from the order, that the petitioner has 2 sons. Both of them are earning. They are not dependent on the petitioner. It appears that his wife is also working. In the circumstances, the petitioner cannot avoid his liability of maintaining his mother. No case is made out for interference. Criminal revision application is dismissed. (SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J)