THE 'HON'BLEWPEGH GGUFE‘ O C M ‘ ’5‘ BI'LJHPUR IN 1am MHTIQN No» ilVQ/aocz P1LPITIONE§§ :\1o Gil-i Lal Suryawanshi, aged 51 years, son of Shri Ram Gopal ‘Suryawanshi, 2w: gr Gram Panchayat ?anch, 3’; ' 2. ‘ Shrigo'pal maram, aged-33 years, 1" ,i hfvwgyk i/‘R/‘! /’ / cultivator, ’ y (é Both 14Es‘idents of} village - 2.‘ c§\ -'a.@'.‘, Sultan Nar, near Baloda, Gram l f M son of shri LVed Ram marém, ' f Nawapara, Out ?ost Baloda, ?olice‘ Station Manama, Tahsil & District Janjgizhc hampa ( Chhatti sgarh . vna-SUug RESPGNDENTS 2 »1- Tikam $ingh Patel, aged 35 years, “ ‘ son of Shri Gem Lal Pate1’ occupatiOn cultivator, ax-Sarpanch‘ ‘ Gram Panchayat Nawap ara, re si dent of village Sultan Nar, near Baloda ,;‘i Tamil & District Janjgir—Champa ( chhattisgarh ), (2’ V‘m strict Collec’nor, J'anjgir—Champa, i ; Q1 ‘ x § / $§¢3§ Tahsildar, Janjgif,"mstrict I; ' ‘ ' 7 JanjgirChampa ‘( Chhattisgarh), law Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Baloda, Tahsil «J‘anjgir, District JanjgirChampa( (LG. ), 5. mstrict Swerinbendem: of ?olice, F HHWHISW ‘ 1 ) j v § (4) 12) @ Janjgir, District J’anjgir-Chawa (‘ Chhat’cisgarh ),. Officer-manage Eolice station Akaltara, Tahsil Janjgir, District X Janjgir‘Champa ( Chhatti sgarh ), State of Chhattiégarh ”through the Secretary , Panchaya’c department, Raipux-( Chha’c’cisgarh ). mm: PEHTIGN UNmR MIIGLE 2g gagmg CONSEITUFIGN BF 'INmA- »X , HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 1248 0f2002 / / / 7 PETI’HONERS : Giri Lal Suryawmshi &an0ther. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Tikam Singh Patel & 6 Others. WRIT PETI'HON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Amit : l l SB: Hon’bae Sim’ Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 3g” Present: Shri Sonmafh Verma“ Advocate for the petitioner.' Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. GA. for the State/respondent No. 2, 3, 5. 6 and 7. Shri R.S.Ma.rhas, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. > ‘ ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 215‘ day of October, 20 10) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instruction, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to statutory forum that may be available to the under the provisions of the Code of Criminal petitioners, Procedure. 1973. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side have no obj ection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty, if so advised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri t Judge“