IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.V.K.BALI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.RAMACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 15TH JANUARY 2007 / 25TH PAUSHA 1928 Cont.Case(C).No.1546 of 2006(S) ----------------------------------------- JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).21429/2006 DATED 18/08/2006 .................... PETITIONER/1ST PETITIONER IN W.P.(C):- ------------------------------------------------ DHANAPALAN, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O. K.VELUKUTTY, PLAVILA VEEDU, JANARDHANAPURAM, VARKALA. BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER RESPONDENT: 1ST RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C):- ---------------------------------------------------- COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, DEVASWOM BOARD OFFICE, NANDANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR. THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K.Bali,C.J. & M.Ramachandran,J. -------------------------------------------- Cont.Case (C).No.1546 of 2006-S --------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 15th day of January, 2007 JUDGMENT V.K.Bali,C.J. (Oral) The order, non-compliance whereof has been complained, reads as follows:- “Petitioner has already filed Ext.P3 representation before the Board and the same is pending consideration. In such circumstances the writ petition is disposed of directing the Board to pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 in accordance with law without any delay”. The learned counsel representing the respondent states that order has been issued for constituting a Committee and if Exhibit P3 was to be decided in favour of the petitioner, Committee would be constituted. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel, this contempt petition is closed. V.K.Bali Chief Justice M.Ramachandran vku/- Judge