IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.500 of 2011 IN C.W.J.C. No. 4869 of 2006 With I.A. No. 2233 of 2011 ====================================================== Parvati Devi, W/o Dr. Parmeshwar Das, R/o Village-Matadih, P.S.- Dharhara, District-Munger. ……..Appellant Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Civil Surgeon –cum-Chief Medical Officer, Nalanda at Biharsharif. ………..Respondents/ Respondents. ==================================================== APPEARANCE : For the Appellant : Mr. Murari Prasad Sinha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Raj Kamal, A.C. to S.C. 9. ==================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2. 24.03.2011 Re. Interlocutory Application No. 2233 of 2011: This application under section 5 of the Limitation Act is filed by the appellant for condonation of delay of five days occurred in filing the Letters Patent Appeal. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the delay is condoned. Interlocutory application stands disposed of. Re. Letters Patent Appeal No. 500 of 2011: The appellant-writ petitioner has preferred this Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent to challenge the judgment and order dated 4th February 2011 passed by the learned single Judge in above C.W.J.C. No. 4869 of 2 2006. Though the appellant had filed the writ petition for redressal of several grievances, at the time of hearing of the writ petition, she confined her prayer to two of the reliefs; namely, payment of arrears of salary for the period from 8th May 1999 to 30th November 2000 as “compulsory waiting period” and the benefit of Assured Career Progression from 9th August 1999. The learned single Judge has directed the appellant to make a fresh representation within one month from the date of the order and the respondent authorities to decide such representation within three months by reasoned and speaking order. In view of the above relief granted by the learned single Judge, we are of the opinion that the present Appeal is misconceived. Learned Advocate Mr. Murari Prasad Sinha has appeared for the appellant. He states that since the appellant has preferred this Appeal, she did not make representation as specified. The appellant may make representation within one month from today. If such representation is made, the same will be considered and decided as directed by the learned single Judge. Subject to the above direction, the Appeal is disposed of. Sujit (R.M. Doshit, CJ.) (Jyoti Saran, J.)