r <yv^r/ IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARHl W. P. N0. \ °>2-0F 200^ PETITIONER Ajit Ram Sahu, S/o Dwarika Prasad Sahu, aged about 39 Years, Occupation— Service, Presently posted Panchayat Kanni, Oram Panchayat Khapri[within jurisdiction of Janpad Panchayat Dondi Lohara, Tahsil Dondi Lohara District Durg [Chhattisgarh] V E R S U S RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh thru' Secretary, Department of ^ j^ Panchayat & Rurgl ..•'""'Oi-S^t4"3 Development, Mantralaya, D "BA^it^7' Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, ^^^^.^ f€) Raipur ~ [CKhattisgarh] t-<t^ f<«'s^^^ &»•^••"" \r^/ ^ ^•'^•^ ^. .^..... ]| i" :! aaB"'' •-}" •"•• yf'W'" ^ 2. Collector, District Durg [Chhattisgarh] 3. GraEU Panchayat, Khapri Khapri, Block Dondi Lohara, ^ Tahsil Dondi Lohara, Distt. Durg [Chhattisgarh] Through its Secretary. A- !1 14U WRIT PETITION UNDER _AM'ICLE_ 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INSIA FOR ISSIIANC&OF WRIT IN NATITRE OF GEKTIORARl. MAMDAMUS PROHIBITION AND, 03'HER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, mREOTKMLOR mREGTIONS» ORDER OR ORDERS: The petitioner above-named most respectfuUy subniits as under: 1. PARTICULARS OF THEPETITIONER: As mentioned in the Cause Title above. 2. PARTICCLARS OFTHEaiBSBQNDENTS: ^S.mentioned ift^lie Cause Title above. in""i"' XI-HC-22 sn^rw f?:IR;3n^T sfitiltidfN' TST '<<i<4i<n'M, siTl1y'i<o, fcii'iiuy Sii^fi ^iach tj.p.l^o- \'}-i^ HWWI ShWVh Rfc«A V^ 2001^ sn^TsraTWHfN' 1, counsel for the petitioner. Advocate. for the State/ resoondents 21.9,2006 Shri Ashish Shrivastav4, Shri Arun Sao. Govt. no. 1 & 2. Shn Vimlesh Baipai. cotuisel for resuondent no.3. Areiuaents heard. Order dictated as followb: This petition is directed (Annexure P-19) passed bv Developiueut Departnient, A/89/2002-2003. Learaed counsel for thd resolutioa of reinoval, a procifci and the CoUector ultimatelv (Annexure P-5) agamst whicU Conunissioner. RaiDur Divf No.l05/B/121/2001-2002 in|v oassed aud fhe inatter Thereafter, fhe CoUector (Annexure P-81, bv which, reinoval of this petitioner placed before the Grasa Sabhla fhe CoUector, the Com.Hiissioner vide Appeal with the Auueal. he also filedl aaatn. frdiin petitioter Cabe tii'^fa'fl-l iwinTiffec^t'<fS]<^i< ^i ari^IT 3I1^T RDE R aeamst the order dated 06.11.2003 the Secretarv, Panchayat and Rural IRaipur (C.G) in Revision No.24- petitioner subniits that on an. iUegal iedine was fUed before the CoUector passed his order dated 22.12.2001 aa appeal was preferred before the ision. Raiour. vide anueal Case aa order dated 30.4.2002 was ,vas reinaaded to the CoUector. passed an order dated 22.7.2002 it was directed fhat fhe niatter of the post of Paachavat Kanni be Against fhe said order passed by fUed an appeal before the N0.221/B/121/2001-2002. Alone au aouUcation for erant of iutei inlwhich XI-HC-22 an^T^T R-fi+aii^r Sh^ll^ f^^f?cT 3^"4l<<lfl<l, ®Tn<d'16,farllti^ 3<l^i >4acb . ^-p' PO- l' *<l«wish«|ch••••••••"•••••••"•• H^ 200^ R'b^. sn^TSTarwfffer 1. stav. Bv an order dated 12.1 Coniinissioner adinitted fhe application. for uiterua order said order. a revision was orel itauuened order was oassed fhe said revision was disiiiissefl Leamed counsel subinii petitiouer which was iiled Coiuiuissioner vide Case No.23 in the ineaawhfle, the post d: now fhe matter has to be ded submissioa is fhat till thd Paachavat. fhe interun proted fhe said pendine aopeal be ed; fhe imDugned order dated 6. 1 After hearine leamed 4 leamed counsel for fhe StaDc petition so as to srant an inteif operate it during fhe nendenc'4 Comjnissioner. Rafher I deeila aufhorih'. to inake efforts petitioner at the earUest. This petition is dispose^ that Appeal No.221/B/121/t Coiaiaissioner, Raipur Divisit: transferred to the Director. F|i chiilci'fl-f *iiii-i1'^'tec^<Ri'L<;i< ^isrRman^T $.2002 Annexure P-11, thoueh the lappeal for flual heariae but the )f stav was disnussed. Asamst the (erred before ftie State. m which the jin 06.11.2003 (Annexure P-19) aad A. ts that the orieiaal proceedine of fhe tn form. of an appeal before the 11/B/ 121/2001-02 was pendine and if Commissioner was abolished and Ided bv the Du'ector, Panchavat. His niatter is decided bv Director, tive order soueht bv fhe petitioner in tanted ia his favour bv settiag aside i.2003 fAanexurc P-19). tounsel for the petitioaer aiid also I am not iacluied to aUow this tua reUef in. favour ofthe uetitioner to of the appeal filed bv him before the it Drooer to direct fhe aDpeUate [o decide the aDpeal filed bv the of at this staee wifh an observation 2001-02 oriemaUv filed beforc the >n. Rainur aad said to have been aiichavat. shall be traced out there XI-HC-22 sn^r^ir R-iitisii^r Stiliti flf?cT (^ 3^? s?FtT?ra', s?ftolre, Ridiu^< 311^1 >^Wh _. (3-^- ^"•^Z- *<IHWI shtllcti-••••••••••••••"•••• ^p]- 200 Ri'tii^ an^r SHITW (rf?? and if the same has not be( learued couasel for the petitibner oossible oreferablv wittun 3 the said file before the appellslte The petitioner shatl be| before the said authoritv alonje- for taking steps to search ou| as directed above. C.c as per rules. fen disposed of so far, as stated by '. it shaU be disoosed of as earlv Imonths froin the date of tracine out aufhoritv. under aa obUeation to file a petition '-with the certi&ed coov ofthis order k the ffle and to dispose of ftie same, +iiild'il1-f iniRfrffte^t'<RiwK. ^; 3-lf^IT STI^T Sd/- Suriil KumarSinha \ Judge ('flty^)