IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1113 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:16.02.2011. Balwinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus Sadhu Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Ajay Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 25.01.2011 by which provisional rent has been assessed @ `2,500/- per month which is the rate of rent as admitted by the petitioner/tenant although the respondent/landlord has claimed the rent @ `7,000/- per month. Learned counsel for the petitioner/tenant submits that the petitioner/tenant had already paid the rent up to 30.06.2009, whereas the learned Rent Controller has assessed the provisional rent from 01.04.2007 to 31.01.2011. The petitioner/tenant, however, has failed to show any prima facie evidence to prove his contention that the rent has already been paid up to 30.06.2009. In view thereof, I do not find any error in the impugned order of the learned Rent Controller, Ludhiana. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed in limine, however, without any order as to costs. February 16, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE