WP(C) 4072/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. A. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. B.K. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department. The ground on which the petitioner has challenged the appointmen t of the respondent No. 4 as Anganwadi helper in the particular Anganwadi Center is that she is under qualified. The requisite qualification is Class-VIII. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent No. 3, the said plea of the petitioner has been denied and it has been stated that the responde nt No. 4 did conform to the required educational qualification and in fact, she secured 1st position in the selection with highest marks. In this connection the respondent No. 3 has enclosed the comparative statement along with the counter affidavit, which depicts that the respondent No. 4 has passed Class-VIII. She al so secured highest marks. Consequently, her name was enlisted for selection. The counter affidavit was filed on 7.12.2010 and the petitioner has not disputed th e pleas raised in the said affidavit by filing any reply affidavit. Thus the pet itioner has admitted the stand taken in the counter affidavit. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed.