IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 4756 of 2009 Date of Decision: November 23, 2010 Raja Ram and others. …Petitioners Versus Kishan and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Naveen Gupta, Advocate, and Mr. S.K. Garg Narwana, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate, for Mr. Ajay Kansal, Advocate, for respondent No.7. **** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 25.07.2009 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jind, thereby rejecting the application moved by the C.R. No.4756 of 2009 plaintiff-petitioners under Section 151/152 C.P.C. for correction of the judgment and decree dated 01.12.1971. Undisputedly, decree dated 01.12.1971 was passed in view of the amicable settlement between the parties. Correction of the decree dated 01.12.1971 was sought after more than three decades. I do not think that decree can be amended after the lapse of more than 34 years. Undisputedly, both the parties have moved mutation applications and got mutation done in accordance with a consent decree dated 01.12.1971. Had there been any mistake, parties would have not moved mutation application. Moving mutation application and getting the mutation done pursuant to the decree dated 01.12.1971 shall bar present correction application in view of the principles of waiver, acquiescence and estopple. Dismissed. November 23, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2