C-t^z SWGLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (Sl No. r^\^ OF 2010. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Mangal Ram Kunwar, S/o. late Shri Samrat Kunwar, aged about 58 years, Head Master, Govt. Middle School Bakawand, District Bastar (C. G.) VERSUS :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) ^^ ^w ^w ^- ^' s>7.^ ^ 'f'" ^' ^^..—"—^^ ^ ,^% ^T/" _^, ;1 ^ I 1 @ Vt}..' {-J-rg/. '•^-...^ ^T^ ^^ 2.' The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Primeses Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Bastar, District Bastar (C. G.) 4. Shri M. L. Shrivastava, aged about 55 years, Lecturer, Govt. Middle School Rajnagar, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) ^?:^'s!!??^§y^sR^I: 5.^ Shri Nivas Mahanti, aged about 57 years, Lecturer, Govt. Middle School Turenar, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .-1j- [C-22 3:H^T'^T _ R'lJch 3T^T 5h^icti 'Mf^a ^- NIWIF »^^ET r^HI^, ^Ti1<H^(o, [cKrll^y ,^.u....e.^..tte.....6.g.i^o... •^^T' S.B:HON'BLE MR. JUSTiCE itRITSNKER DIWAKER 25-11-2010: Shri Somkant Tiwari, coun^ Shri Vivek Sharma, PL for Grievance of the petitione| respondents No.4 & 5 as Uppe^ the petitioner has not been con| post of Lecturer. Contention of the coun^el for the petitioner is that his representations are already per|ding and ends of justice wou!d be sen/ed If at this stage, the petil petition with a direction to th^ pending representation. State counsei has no obj| petitioner are decided strictly in 8|i !n view of the above, th{ pending representation ofthe pe' on merits of the case and the au to declde the representation in a^cordance wlth lavsf. CM^f<n<fll 'HW^f"? 'fe^ <F3i<^i< '^3irf^R37T^T >e! for the petitioner. he State. is that though he is senior to the Division Teacher but the name of >idered for promotion to the higher ioner is permitted to withdraw the respondent No.2 to declde the ^ction If the representations of the scordance with law. i^ present petition is dismissed as withdrawn vi/ith a djrection to ttje respondent No. 2 to decide the itioner as expedltiousiy as posslbie. t is made clear that this qourt has not expressed any opinion hority concemed would be at iiberty .,sd't)^et ^^' [^ -;tfeji