1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 3169 of 2009 Mohd Sqadique v. State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr Mahesh Rai, Adv for applicant Ms T. Khade, APP for State Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 15th September 2009 1. Applicant is seeking bail in Crime No. 41/08 registered with Police Station, Pinjar under Sections 302, 498A, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Learned counsel for applicant contends that co- accused have been released on bail and he is entitled to be released on parity. Moreover, according to him, there are no independent eye witnesses and the witnesses cited by the prosecution are related to deceased and that after learning about the incident through his cousin brother, applicant had 2 immediately lodged report. 3. Applicant had earlier moved Criminal Application No. 439 of 2009 and this Court while rejecting the said application, granted liberty to applicant to move afresh if the trial is not completed within three months. That order was made on 2nd May 2009 and since trial is not completed by this time even though more than three months have passed, applicant has moved present application exercising liberty granted to him. 4. Without dealing with the application for bail on merit, I direct the concerned Sessions Judge to expedite trial and dispose it off preferably within three months. If for any reason trial Court is unable to dispose of trial within the stipulated period, liberty to the applicant to move for bail before the trial Court. In the event filing of such application is occasioned, trial Court shall consider and decide the same in view of contentions raised in paragraph 2 of this order. Application disposed of accordingly. Judge. hsj