1 33 S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.6/2008 IN S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3439/2005 (Dilip Singh Vs. Viond Zutshi, I.A.S. & Anr.) Date of Order :: 15th January 2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.P.R.Singh for the petitioner .... Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of this Contempt Petition on 24.07.2007, the petitioner has been informed by the communication dated 28.07.2007 that subsistence allowance was not enhanced for his non co- operation in the inquiry; that now he has been re-instated ; and that the decision would be taken on the point (regarding subsistence allowance) at the time of final decision on the basis of the result of the inquiry. Learned counsel submits that in view of the communication dated 28.07.2007, the petitioner cannot legitimately press for any proceeding in this Contempt Petition against the respondent but seeks otherwise to challenge the communication dated 28.07.2007 and to take resort to appropriate remedies for redressal of his grievance. In view of the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, it is apparent that the respondents have carried out the requirements of the order dated 18.01.2007 and have 2 decided on the representation made by the petitioner on 28.02.2007. In this view of the matter, and looking to the overall circumstances, there does not appear any necessity to proceed against the respondents in Contempt; and this petition is required to be rejected. Needless to say that in relation to any other cause of action or grievance, the petitioner is obviously free to take resort to appropriate remedies in accordance with law. The Contempt Petition stands rejected. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. s.soni