IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2008 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1930 RP.No. 1193 of 2007(J) -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.20468/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS: --------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF PRINTING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH. RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C): --------------------------------------------------------- A.MUHAMMED KUNJU, S/O AHAMMED MUSLIYAR, CHARUVILAKATHU VEEDU, KURAKKODU, NEDUMANGADU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI. SREEVALSAM GOPALAKRISHNAN. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/03/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ R.P. 1193 OF 2007 IN W.P.(C) 20468 of 2007 ------------------------------------- Dated: MARCH 27, 2008 ORDER The writ petition was disposed of by judgment dated 7th August, 2007 directing that the process of recruitment initiated by Ext.P1 be expedited and completed. Such direction was issued by taking note of the submission of the writ petitioner that by delaying appointment on regular basis, the respondent was engaging employees on daily wages. 2. Now the review petition has been filed submitting that G.O. dated 6.2.1962 based on which Ext.P1 was issued is inapplicable to the printing department. It is stated that for the printing department there is no special rules governing the post of Examiner and therefore it is proposed to frame special rules and defer recruitment till then. However, there is no dispute to the fact that in the printing department Ext.P1 has been followed for recruitment. If that be so, I do not see any justification for the stand taken at present. The idea seems to be to delay the R.P. 1193 OF 2007 IN W.P.(C) 20468 of 2007 Page numbers recruitment and to continue the appointment on daily wages, which arrangement is continuing even now. I see no justification for review. Review petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-