:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.789 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.789 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.789 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL (L) NO.81 OF 2006 APPEAL (L) NO.81 OF 2006 APPEAL (L) NO.81 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.1935 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.1935 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.1935 OF 2005 Bharatiya Bhavan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. .. Applicant V/s Smt. Krishna H. Bajaj & Ors. .. Respondents ----- Mr.Swapnil Rane i/b. Ashwin Ankhad for the Applicant. Mr.Cyrus Ardeshir for Respondent No.1. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2006. DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2006. DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Applicant is seeking condonation of 31 days delay. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) :2: (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)