/^°. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DHnSION BENCH ^.A..1'38 }^oli CORAM; Appellants InJail Respondent HON'BLEMR. T.P. SHARMA 8s HON'BLE MR. N.K. AGARWAL. JJ. Criminal Appeal (P.R.t No. 434/2011 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Versus Daduram aged about 40 years, S/o Devcharan Lilaram aged about 32 years, S/o Devcharan Ratl'iraiii aged about 35 yeai's S/o Devcharan Chunulal aged about 25 years, S/o Dauram Devcharan aged about 60 years, S/o Ratiram AU R/o VUlage KIiarvani, Beladula, Thana Jaijaipur, Distt. Janjgir Champa The State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Jaijaipur, Distt. Janjgir Champa. APPEAL UNDER SBCTIOH 374 (2) OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Pl'esent:--Shn Parag Kotecha, Advocate for fhe appellaats. Shri Sanjeev Kuniai' Agrawal, P.L. for flie State/respoudent, ORAL-JUDGEMENT (Passedon 03/02/2011) The followins iudsment of the Court was passed by T.P. Sharma, J:- 1. By this crunuial appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure appellants DadLiram, Lilai'am, Rathram, Chunulal, Devcharan have challenged the legality and propriety of the judgment '^, dated 12/11/2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti session division Janjgeer Champa (C.G.) in Sessions Trial No. 143/2009. Aforesaid appellants have already preferred an appeal along witti other convicted accused persons in Cr. A. No. 844/09 wliich is pending. Consequently, present criminal appeal is redundant and saine is dismissed as redundant. However, appellants and learned counsel for fhe appellants may after filing memo. in aforesaid criminal appeal submit tlieir case. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge <^-