IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 3524 of 2006 Date of Decision: July 8, 2008 Jagmal and another …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Rajbir Sehrawat, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Addl. AG, Haryana, for the respondents. M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The petitioners have prayed for quashing notification dated 27.11.2003 (P-1), issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) and declaration dated 24.11.2004 (P-7), issued under Section 6 of the Act. The petitioners have claimed that they are co-owner in possession of residential house comprised in Khasra No. 310/9(0-5-0), Gair Mumkin Makaan, situated in the revenue estate of Village Islampur, Tehsil and District Gurgaon. 2. When the matter came up for consideration on 7.3.2006, a Division Bench of this Court has stayed the dispossession of the C.W.P. No. 3524 of 2006 petitioners in terms of order passed in another similar petition bearing CWP No. 12955 of 2005. However, during the pendency of the petition, the claim made by the petitioners for release of land has been considered by the State Government. To that effect, an affidavit of the Land Acquisition Collector, Gurgaon, has been filed in the Court stating that the prayer made by the petitioner has been partly accepted, inasmuch as, out of the aforementioned total area comprised in Khasra No. 310/9(0-5-0), the area falling under Khasra No. 310Min (0-3-0) has been released by the State Government. The remaining area has not been released as the same falls in green belt and service road. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the paper book, we are of the considered view that the land that has been released constitute substantial portion of the acquired land under Sections 4 and 6 of the Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners has expressed satisfaction as substantial relief stand granted. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (SABINA) July 8, 2008 JUDGE Pkapoor 2