IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE (Cl No. /2010 ^ETITIONER .VLO. <3^fc?7'::^ \^...^' ^•^'^^•'^^•1^ ^SSSB""- " ^...•y\ ^^••--" h S.R. Sahu, S/o. Late Shri Umendi Ram Sahu, Aged about 65 years, Retired Mechanic Grade- 1, Minimata Bango Dam Project, Division Machadoli, District - Korba, R/o. Village- Sonsari, Block- Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) SPONDENTS VERSUS 1. C.K. Khetan, Secretaiy, Department of Water Resources, Mantralaya, DKS, Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Subodh Shrivastava, Chief Engineer, Minimata Bango Dam Project, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. S.P. Sharma, Executive Engineer, Minimata BangQ Dam Project, E/M Division, MachadoU, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 4. Umesh Agrawal, Divisional jQiEit Director, Treasury, Account & Pension, Bilaspur Division, BUaspur (C.G.) 5. 6. Subir Malik, Accountant General, Chhattisgarh Pagariya Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Vijendra, F>resident High Power Committee, and Secretaiy Finance Department, Govt. of Chhatdsgarh, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT.1973 SSiiZ^E " 3B3 iSS2'&Bi g,,tS,fSlcscS''-asiaes-s----^' '•! s ^•" iSgs^Ss. IXI-HC-22 ^T, sn^r'^iT l<-ti.<h 311^1 ^>Hi<* <lfid r. 'S^ -^MM^, 8>Tilu<i<o, ftciiyy 3nif?r TR^ (^v*'.c^^Cc^ rv"3LU/^-yo •^ 200/ \^ IIICTI «)11<*l Iq^CT' OT^T TRTWdfN SB : Hon'ble Shri IVtanindra Moha 14-02-2011 Shri I. S. Sahu, counsel for tt1 Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Heard. This petition has been fil| disobedience of order dated 17-01 Petition (S) No. 3558 of 2009. )e petitioner. couitisel for respondents No.1 & 3. 017 Learned counsel for the pet(:ioner filed before this Court alleging non-j directed the petitioner to file repres^ Dues Committee and also directeitl matter and to complete exercise inc| the petitioner, within a period of foi( copy ofthis order. bten necess$ry tlas Learned counsel for responc| petitioner has been considered anijl payable tQ the petitioner, has submitted that after making due and payable, i.e.Rs.20,555/-, cheque and the petittoner has recei\|'i From the order, which was Writ Petition(S) No. 3558 of 2009, decided the matter on merits but the matter and to oomplete exerci* cbi'itift'fl'l ^WvS'?^S <(«1«1< ^3if:gq3n^r LShrivastava, J. ed by the petjtioner against willful 7-2009 passed by this Court in Writ submits that on a petition being payment of retirai dues, this Court had entation before the High Power Retiral the said Committee to consider the uding payment of retiral dues, if any, to ir months from the date of receipt of a >nts No.1 & 3 submits that case of the the amount, which is found due and paid to the petitioner. It is also enquiry, the amount, which is found been paid to the petitioner through 'ed the same on 07-01-2011. >assed by this Court on 17-07-2009 in it is revealed that this Court has not directed the Committee to consider .e including payment of retiral dues, if tiad [^ ^fe'i f/"^^ ? ifes§%- I., "t l-""—-•"-;•^XI-HC-22 Y ^-y "»,,^•i-..i-^-" SII^T^I R-ii* sij^i ?tR 'yf^rt •I. » <• ^^ -41'tiict^, ^•dly'iio, (»«ii«y,< 3TT^?T '<ra^? »lt*l<11 (htich •^ 200 fci'bity 3II^[?%IWHf?B any, to the petitioner, within a period of a copy of this order. Thereafter, tt|i Submission of learned counsel for th< been paid till date to the petitioner, 14 by the committee, may give rise to c^ recourse to the appropriate remedy law. However, 1 am not inclined t<t making the payment of entire amou| dated 17-07-2009 passed bythis Coi| grievance is that the full amount as d ofthe said amount has been paid, it to such remedy as may be available With the aforesaid observatior] <:r>r'iti<n<i"ti •tn'H<liT^ 'f^st' ^i^.t't. ^Tsif^Tsn^r pf four months from the date of receipt le said committee had taken decision. 3 petitioner that the amount, which has not in accord with the decision taken iuse of action for the petitioner to take as may be available to him under the accept the submission that by not nt as claimed by the petitioner, order jrt has been violated. If the petitioner's laimed, has not been paid or only part ^ould be open for him to take recourse jnder the law. , the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge f^ sferq