IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No.16562 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision.29.09.2011 Jain Bhagwan Garg, Senior Life member, Shri Sanatan Dharam Education Society (Regd), GT Road, Panipat, r/o House No.435, Model Town, Panipat, Haryana and another .....Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana through the Director, Higher Education, Haryana, Panchkula, Haryana and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Jasmeet Singh Bedi, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he will be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-8), which has been issued on behalf of the petitioner, is considered by respondent No.2 within a particular time. 2. The representation shall be decided by respondent No.2 if the same is represented again along with copy of this order within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 3. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 29, 2011 Pankaj*