IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.922 of 2007 SHWETA @ SWETA KUMARI Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 3 02.03.2009 In the instant writ application, the petitioner prays for commanding the respondent authorities to initiate criminal prosecution under IPC against one of the respondent Smt. Sneh Lata Verma, wife of Sri Pramod Kumar Karn who has filed false and fabricated document in judicial proceedings before this Court as well as Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Learned counsel submits that aforesaid respondent has taken aid of forged documents while she was pursuing her case against the petitioner. In this respect, learned counsel relying upon Section 340 of the Cr.P.C. submits that this Court can direct for appropriate prosecution against the concerned respondent. Mr. Anil Kumar Jha represents respondent no. 1 to 8 and submits that no relief has been sought against him. The State authorities are also respondents. After hearing learned counsel for the parties this Court finds that, the allegation of the petitioner is that the concerned respondent used forged document in the Court. The allegation is not that the concerned respondent made forgery in the documents once the same was presented in the Court. In this view of the matter, this application is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate complaint before appropriate Court. Kundan (S. P. Singh, J.)