IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25820 of 2009 SUNIL KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.8.2009 Heard Sri Shantanu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. While dismissing the prayer for bail of the petitioner the learned Judge made reference to a particular letter of this court bearing no.952 of 1979 and has mentioned that no absconder accused could be granted bail by any court and that his trial should proceed on day to day basis when the learned trial Judge is very much aware of the directions of this court contained in the above general letter, then the court believes that he is proceeding with the trial on day to day basis without any interruption of hearing and thus, that way, he will be disposing of the trial of this petitioner. No adjournment could be granted in the case and the trial could be concluded in six months time from the day, the learned Judge receives a copy of the present order, else the learned Judge shall submit an explanation to this court as to why he could not keep up with the directions of this court and violated the same. The prayer for bail is dismissed with the above directions. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )