IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2008 STATE OF GOA THROUGH POLICE INSPECTOR BICHOLIM ... Petitioner Versus MR. IMTAYAZ SHAIKH ... Respondent Ms. Winnie Coutinho, Public Prosecutor, for the Petitioner. Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. Date:- 21st May, 2008 P.C. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. The order dated 11.4.2008 is sought to be challenged while seeking cancellation of the bail granted to the respondent solely on the ground that he had violated one of the condition of the bail which required the respondent not to enter Bicholim area. The contention is sought to be raised on the sole statement of the constable that the respondent was found in the Bicholim market on 31.1.2008 around 12.30 hours. Undisputedly no independent witness was examined nor any such statement of any witnesses has been recorded in support of the claim that the respondent was found moving in Bicholim market on 31.1.2008 and that apart, the applicant have not filed chargesheet for last more than 8 months. Only excuse that has been given is that the report from C.F.S.L. is awaited. Neither the petitioner nor the respondent have made any efforts to get such report as expeditiously as possible. There is nothing on record to substantiate the claim of the applicant about the alleged violation of the terms of the bail by the respondent. In the circumstances the view taken by the leaned Sessions Judge cannot be found fault with. There is no case for cancellation of the bail of the respondent and hence, the petition is rejected. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. SMA