1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2859 OF 2010 ( Priti Prakash Lichade Vs. State of Maharashtra thr Secretary Integrated Child Development Deptt. Mumbai & Ors. ) ........................................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................................ Shri N. N. Motghare Adv for petitioner. Shri Parihar AGP for respondent-1. Ms Inamdar Adv h/f Ms. Jog Adv for respondents 9 & 10. CORAM: B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & A. P. BHANGALE JJ. DATED: 26th SEPTEMBER, 2011. Heard Shri Motghare, learned counsel for the petitioner. He points out that though interviews were conducted on 29.01.2011, the Committee which has undertaken that exercise be ceased+ to be an illegal committee in view of the Government Resolution dated 27/01/2010. Committee reconstituted by said Resolution ought to have undertaken that exercise. Learned AGP states that he still awaits the instructions. According to him date on which that Government Resolution was published in Gazette is not on record. Ms. Inamdar learned counsel for respondents 9 and 10 states 2 that copy of Government Resolution dated 27.01.2010 was received on 11.02.2010 and till then entire proceeding was over. We find that petition is already dismissed on 20.12.2010 against respondent no.3-Chairman of Mahila and Bal Kalyan Samiti. Not only this the date on which the reconstitution of interview committee was published in Government Gazette is not on record. However, looking to the nature of challenge we give the petitioner an opportunity to make representation to Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Chandrapur in the matter within a period of four weeks from today. If the representation is made said office shall look into the matter in accordance with law as early as possible and in any case within four weeks. In addition thereafter liberty to petitioner to file appropriate proceedings before the competent authority. In this view of the matter, petition is dismissed. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE svk