1 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3299 of 2009 Sinhgad Technical Education Society. ...Petitioner vs. 1.State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents --- Mr.C.J.Sawant, Sr.Advocate i/b. Mr.Nitin Dhumal, for Petitioner. Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, AGP for Respondent no.1. Mr.V.M.Thorat, for Respondent nos.3 to 5. Mr.R.P.Behere, for Respondent no.2. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED: 17TH FEBRUARY,2010 P.C.: 1. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. By consent of parties, the order impugned in this petition is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Committee for fresh consideration of the Review petition. By consent of parties, the Committee is requested to decide the 2 following issues:- (i) Whether on the basis of Applications/ proposals submitted by the petitioner Societies Sinhgad Dental College & Hospital for fixation of final fees for academic year 2006-07 & 2007-08, review petition dt. 19.03.2008 filed by the students/ parents and the reply/ clarification/ submission dt.22.04.2008 filed by the petitioner, the petitioner Societies Sinhgad Dental College & Hospital is entitled to claim fees of Rs.2,40,000/- for the academic year 2006-07 and Rs. 2,58,000/- for the academic year 2007-08, in view of the office calculation made by the Shikshan Shukla Samiti the amount of fee per student for the academic year 2006-07 comes to more than Rs.3,00,000/- ? (ii) Whether the Shikshan Shulka Samiti was justified in considering the divisor factor at 200 when the strength of students sanctioned and admitted in the college was 150 when admittedly as per the policy of the samiti in case of new college, half of the total sanctioned strength of the first 2 3 years is to be taken into consideration? 2. Parties are directed to appear before the Committee on 8.3.2010 alongwith the copy of this order. The Committee is requested to decide the Review petition and the aforesaid issues as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from 8.3.2010. 3. It is directed that till the Review petition is decided again by the Committee pursuant to the order passed in this petition, the students will continue to pay fees as fixed by the orders which are impugned in this petition, subject to the decision in the Review petition. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (A.R.JOSHI,J.)