AB 3134/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE. A.K.GOSWAMI Heard Mr. J. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K. Munir, learned Public Prosecutor, Assam. The learned Public Prosecutor has made available the case diary for peru sal of this Court. I have perused the same. Contrary to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner on 28-9-2011 to the effect that the alleged victim had returned to her parental hom e, it transpires that the victim girl had not reached her home and that she is traceless. The prayer for bail is opposed by Mr. K. Munir. On consideration of the materials on record and considering that the whe reabouts of Jima Daimari is not known, this Court is of the opinion that it is n ot a fit case to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. The interim bail passed earlier shall stand recalled.