IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3274 of 2005 PROF. RAJESHWAR PRASAD ROY Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. with CWJC No.10670 of 2003 PROF. RAJESHWAR PRASAD ROY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 4. 18.5.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also Mr Shivendra Kishore, learned counsel for opposite party-J.P. University and the learned counsel appearing for B.R.A. Bihar University as also Mr. Ajay, learned counsel appearing for respondent-J.P. University in the writ case. The only dispute, which is being agitated, is with regard to payment of 12.5% compound interest over the amount of group insurance. Learned counsel for the University submits that the petitioner has been paid simple interest at the rate of 10% and the matter with regard to the admissibility for payment of interest at the rate of 12.5% per annum over the aforesaid amount is pending consideration before the Apex Court. The parties have no dispute on this question. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner proposes to represent the matter before the University with respect to his claim for interest as per the direction of the Apex Court and he would be entitled as per the direction of the Apex Court in this regard. In view of the above, both the contempt application and the writ application stand disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)