1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 560/2008 (Kehar Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 07/02/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Niranjan Singh for the petitioners. Mr. J.P.S.Choudhary, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the deceased died due to electrocution as while putting clothes came in contact with live wire and as such she suffered the injury accidently resulting in death. After thorough investigation, the police did not find case and submitted negative final report. However, on protest petition, the trial court took the cognizance of the offence. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that similalry situated co-accused Mahangi Bai has been granted bail by the trial court and the case of the petitioners is not distinguishable. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail, having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is 2 allowed and it is directed that petitioners Kehar Singh S/o Bakhtawar Singh and Balvinder Singh S/o Kehar Singh be released on bail in FIR No. 114/06 P.S. Hindumalkode, Sri Ganganagar, provided each of them executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP