IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.944 OF 2011 Jalindar s/o Onkar Satpute ... APPLICANT VERSUS State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT ..... Shri A.S. Shaikh, Advocate for applicant Shri N.B. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 17th March, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard. The accused/ applicant, in custody from 22.9.2010, for an offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, dated 7.9.2010 seeks bail. 2. Counsel submits, charge sheet is filed, nothing to demonstrate involvement of the accused/ applicant, no motive, and the statement of the witnesses could be under coercion. He also submits, the accused/ applicant resides 13 Kms. away from the residence of the deceased. Consequently, he has nothing to do with either killing or eliminating the deceased Bilal Ahmed Qureshi. 3. It is not as if the accused/ applicant is totally innocent person. His sister-in-law has seen him in the early morning (the accused) sleeping with blood stains on apparels and on questioned, accused was weary and frightened also. The accused/ applicant has made statement to 2-3 witnesses, admitting his guilt with spite and implacable. Motive was, the deceased Bilal was allegedly teasing wife of the accused/ applicant. He teached a permanent lesson. The brutality with which the offence is committed, does not call for any interference. Application lacks merits, dismissed. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cwp980.10