IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 13/2003 Date of Decision: 24.4.2007 Kamla Devi …Petitioner. -versus- Financial Commissioner (Appeals) & others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?* For the Appellants : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate. For the Respondent No.1 : Mr. M.S.Chandel, AG with Mr. M.A. Khan & Ms. Meenakashai Dy. AG. For the respondent No.2 : Mr. C.B. Singh, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): By the medium of this petition the o rder dated 20th July, 2002 has been assailed by the petitioner. The petitioner was proceeded exparte by the Financial Commissioner (Appeals) in revenue revision. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner has fairly stated that since the petitioner has been proceeded exparte, she may be permitted to file appropriate proceedings for getting the exparte order set aside. The prayer is genuine and not opposed by the respondents. Accordingly the petitioner is permitted to take appropriate steps for getting the exparte order dated 20th July, 2002 set aside. However, it is * Whether the reporters of the Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment? 2 clarified that the respondents will not take the plea of limitation, if the petitioner files petition before the appropriate forum for getting the order dated 20th July, 2002 set aside. The petition is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. April 24, 2007 *Awasthi*