< \\ .^' ***' -„ ..••' <A(S;-/f@% .^--:'j, .M;/-/> ^^ o SINGtE BEIICff &®c IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (S) N0. ffor}0f 2011 9-r^ PETITIONERS / T.C. Chatiu-bidam, S/o. Shri Dharamdas Chaturbidani, Aged about 50 yeais, Assistant Grade-2, R/o Kaurin Bhata, Sheetlapara, Ward No.39, District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Secretary, Depaitinent of Vetermary Development, Mantralaya, DK5 Bhawan, Raipur, Disfaact - Raipur (C.G.) /I. Director, Vetermary Services, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ^3. Joint Direc^or, Vetermary Services, Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) 4. Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, BUaspur, District-BUaspur (C.G.) /5. Dr. R. P. Sonwane, Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, Bilaspur, District-BIlaspur (C.G.) WRIT FETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmJTION OF INDIA p^"-^ XI-HC—78 aii^r ^RI 1<;-< ^Pff 3II^?I'3RR? 'S^ '<iWM'i{, •&'^\W , h'^Wy, ^.P <o-> S^- LI°-II *ll*lCTl th*ll<*> sv^i Tra?? (yil^i^i) 200 ^tiiwaft^sn^r •?1 >«tl*! 28.07.2011 Shri Chandresh Shrivas1|ava, Shri A.V.Shridhar, P.L. f{: Challenge in the pres) 12.7.2011 (Annexure P/l) pas4 Services, Rajnandgaon wherefcjy suspension, Contention of the cour^el there being any basis, on frivcjlous put under suspension. On the other hand, petitioner has an altemative| Director and as suoh the At this stage, counsel fo{ petition with Uberty to apprc>ac|h submits that the appellate auf| of the petitioner expeditiously. Accordingly, the petitiojl eventuality of filing appeal by date of receipt of copy of thi^ decide the same as expeditiousl It is made olear that fhii on the merits of the case andi liberty to decide the appeal stri): q»i<i[tn<fti *1t^^* tf f^>'L<il <F*it^.i< ^TSffin 311^1 ava, counsel for the petiticner. sr the State. snt petition is to the order dated ed by the Deputy Director, Veterinary the petitioner has been put under for the petitioner is that without charges, the petitioner has been ptate oounsel* points out that the remedy of filing appeal before the prese^tt petition is premature. the petitioner wants to withdraw this the appellate authority. He however jiority be directed to decide the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In the petitioner within ten days froai the order, the appellate authority shall |y as possible in accordance with law. Court has not esxpressed any opiaion the authority concemed would be at fptly in accordance with Ja'.E. Sd/- s ludge tttie