IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-18812 of 2009 Date of decision:18.12.2009. Charanjit Lal Gulati ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Neena Madan, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Maharaj Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. Replies on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, presented today in the Court, are taken on record. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioner and respondent No.2 have compounded the offences and have placed on record documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P-3. Petitioner and respondent No.2 are present in the Court and are identified by their respective counsel. They own up the compounding. They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statement is also recorded separately. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.466 dated 26.11.2004, under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC, P.S. Civil Lines, Karnal, District Karnal (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. December 18, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE