K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.546 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.190 OF 2004 The CIT City-XII Mumbai ..Appellant Versus M/s.Nahar & Seth Enterprises ..Respondents ---- Mr.A.S.Rao & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Ms.Aasifa Khan for the respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 26th March, 2008. PC 1. There is a delay of 269 days. We have also heard the appeal on merits. Cconsidering the cause shown, delay condoned. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.190 OF 2004 . The question of law which arises here are the same which arose in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.189/2004. For the reasons set out therein, question of law does not arise and consequently, appeal dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)