IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52218 of 2007 1. MANGAN RISI 2. SITARAM RISI 3. MANAI RISI 4. JANARDHAN RISHI 5. PINKU RISI 6. PRASADI RISI 7. MD. NIZAMUDDIN 8. MD.MUSTAFA KAMAL 9. SATYA NARAYAN MANDAL …PETITIONERS Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. MD. SHOIB ALAM …OPPOSITE PARTIS For the petitioners: Mr.Shivendra Kr. Sinha & : Mr.Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Advocates For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyaya,APP ----------- 04. 30.08.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. Order impugned indicates the satisfaction of the court based on the statements of witnesses adduced in course of enquiry made under section 202 Cr. P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the land(s) belong to the accused persons. He, however, is not able to produce the Khatiyan in respect of the said land(s). This Court does not find any patent illegality in the order meriting interference. However, petitioners may agitate these grievances at the time of framing of charge. The application is dismissed with liberty aforesaid. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )