^ sa'Siissg |l|:^i!^^&E5i^ IS-^-r^^i^^ r r^. 4'< HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. 397 of2000 Petitioncr Arun Kiunar Soiu, Late Shri Suraj Prasad Soiii, aged about 26 years,R/o ViU^e- Bandiia, Tahsil- Sitapur, District- Sai^uja Versus Respoadents 1. The State ofMadhyaPradesh fhiough Sceretaiy, School Education Department, VaUdah Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) 2. Janpad Panchayat," Mainpat, District- Saiyija (C.O.) 3. Gram Panchayat, Bandna, TahsU- Sitapur, Distnot- Sarguja 4. The ^sistant District Ia^)ector ofSchoob, Maaupat, District- Sarguja (C.G.) Sin^e Beadt: Hon'bte Mr. Justfce SaUsh K. Agnlliotxi. Shn K. A. Ansari, Senior Advocate wifh Shri N. P. Kcla, Advocate for fhc pctitioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, P&ncl lawyer for fhe Respondents No. l and4. None for the Respondents No. 2 axid 3. ORAL ORDER (23rd January, 2006) The foVcwmf order ofthe Court was passed by SatkA K. Agriliotei, J. 1. Pursuaat to fhe notificatkin dated 13.6.1997 (Anncxurc P/l), fhe pctitioncr madc an appUcation for appomtment on fhe post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-III against one vacancy available ia Priaiaiy School Banda, Dfatrict- Sxu-guaj. The petittoncr was sekcted, howevcr, the appoiataient order was not issued. The petittoner was infonaed by tetter dated 22.9.1998 (Annexure P/7) issued by fhe Rcspondent No.2 that thc appointment onler could not bc issucd to the petitioner, because no vstcaacy of IS'ilii .. 48 Shiksha Karmi was available in thc Prunary School, BaiKlna. This lettcr was issued on fhc basis of the report dated 5.7.1998, subnutted by fhe Asstetaat District Educatton Inspcctor, Mainpat. Shri K. A. Ansari, lcanaed Senior counsel appearittg for the petitioner subinits that fhe vacancy was aad is stiM avaflable at Piimaiy School, Bandna. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, learaed P&ncl lawyer appearing for fhe Respondents No. 1 aad 4 submits fhat the avaBability of the vacancy is disputed. Be that as it inay, the petitioiier is graatcd an opportunity to make a representation before 'the conccnied authorily for consideiatfon of his case for appointment, if there is aay vacancy, in accoidance wifh law. Ifany represcntation is inade, the concemed aufhority is directed to consider and decide fhe represcntatmu in. accordance wifh law within a period of four weeks fiiom the date ofreceipt ofthe representatioa. For fhe reasons stated above, this petitkin stands disposed of No costs. Sd/- Satish K. AgiiiSiutri Judge Thakur