1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4131/2006 (Sant Shri Asharam Bapu Ashram Vs. State of Rajasthan & ors.) Date of Order :: 8th July 2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.Sanjeev Johari for the petitioner Mr.O.P.Boob, Addl. Govt. Counsel The matter has been placed on board today on IA No.7868/2008 at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel Mr.Sanjeev Johari appearing for the petitioner submits that this writ petition was required to be preferred essentially for the reason that the appeal as preferred by the petitioner remained pending with the Revenue Appellate Authority and for the said Appellate Authority being not functioning, the petitioner was suffering hardship. However, it is pointed out that the Revenue Appellate Authority, Udaipur has now decided the matter by the judgment dated 07.05.2008 whereby the revision petitions of the petitioner have been allowed and the questioned orders dated 05.07.2006, 13.09.2006, 28.11.2005 and 13.07.2006 have been quashed and set aside and the matter has been remanded to the respondent No.4 Tehsildar, Sagwara to grant opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and then to proceed with the matter afresh. 2 It is submitted that in view of these subsequent developments, the petitioner does not want to press the present writ petition at this stage and seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file afresh if occasion so arise. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter is pending before the Tehsildar but for the Tehsildar being not inclined to proceed with the same because of pendency of this writ petition, such urgent request was required to be made before this Court for withdrawal of the petition. Learned Additional Government Counsel has no objection if the writ petition is withdrawn. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case and for the submissions as made on behalf of the petitioner, it appears appropriate to permit the petitioner to withdraw this writ petition particularly in view of the subsequent developments as stated. In fact, for the developments as stated, this writ petition is practically rendered redundant because essentially the grievance of the petitioner so far this writ petition is concerned, can no longer be considered surviving as the Revenue Appellate Authority is said to have dealt with the appeal and to have remanded the matter. Therefore, without going into any other aspect of the matter, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this writ petition 3 as prayed. So far the proposition of granting any liberty is concerned, as per the submissions noticed above, when the cause so far this petition is concerned, no longer survives, there appears no necessity of stating any other liberty because it goes without saying that in case of any fresh cause of action, the parties are entitled to take resort to their remedies in accordance with law. IA No.7868/2008 is allowed; and this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. MK