IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33343 of 2010 SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being husband is languishing in jail custody since 17.8.2010 in a Complaint Case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A, 494 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner is denying the marriage whereas through the counter affidavit complainant has asserted the marriage. Paragraph 4 of the impugned order suggests that the petitioner was ready to pay the certain amount to the complainant and the same plea has been reiterated on instruction by the learned counsel for the petitioner before this Court and expressed readiness of the petitioner to pay Rs. 1,000/- per month from September, 2010 to the complainant. The said amount will be deposited in the account of the complainant in first week of every month. The aforesaid amount will no way have any bearing on the contentions of the respective parties with regard to their relationship. The payment will be further subject to any order being passed in the 2 maintenance or the matrimonial proceeding. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner namely, Santosh Kumar Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Complaint Case No. 793C of 2008. Anand Kr. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)