ar “WC WUOOQ Wwm WW mW $affaum RESPO N DENTS‘ --- M awart comsei f0! ihe §et§?,§oner. Sanfosh KLLmaf N)E. Siate of Chhat‘tisgam‘ Througk}: The 3ecieéa'ry, Paws Wei’ks Department, DK.$. B?1awanv Examm {CG} The Deputy $ecretary, Pubikz Woa'kS Depamneni, DAKS. Shawzan, i a‘iwr, ms) T'ie Exemfve ¢ngiwaer V mks vegar‘mam, Ragam '73 Distnct Razgam (C‘G) Ho‘iam $ingh Sikarwar, Sio Laie Ramchaaran Smgh smarwaf, Aged aboat 56 years, Ass§stant Engmaey, PubEc Worka Deparment, Ra%garh, Tahsii & Di$irict Ra§garh (CG) mymai Singh, 8/0 Late Shri Adhar Siwgh .ha aged aboat £5 yeah, wb Duns ona‘ Ogfacer Pubh Works Degarimem, aua wmien No‘ Raigaa’h, (CG), Rio Martin Chakz’adhar Nagar, Near Water Tank? QV N3 Kh " Raiaar‘n: TahsH 8: Distr§ci Raigam (Ca) CY 3" m 3am, m W. ) No $55 mm (WEI) Versus— (Wrii Petitioa under Arikie 228 of éhe CenS‘citutmh of 1nd§e> g e Ee’m.‘ ’u-ioxn hie $hri ‘Qhkerida'a Mighf% :3. wm 3§§2i§@8: W d ated 4-SL2 ...:he griavance of the pet image? arder of Annexwe—PB was hoiding the charge 9f Sm}, Er over fee charge im View of the or: Qer éeted Q-Q-EOGB paseed by ihis Cow? in n V‘J ”w per oher 340%”: S mm Sm Sia‘igefrespendents and same s concemed authomy within a per y neafCi itioner ¥s that‘ he had cemmied w§ih the Q93 Mwezreéay the pet§§§en5r, Wins Maneradwgarh, Sub Divismn of PWQ was r1 Howeven he was act pe;’m§tted to take Nferfed é“ Sun aw s or; Rama J83 310.5893/2008 The saii 1 W§ ’“m'ése (I Leamed counsel for ihe p amd subr mt g§ven cir' He fur: m1 amd m the ms INWe sassa mthe {epi’esentaz WM the tramfw v > . d fecied 5:0 Hea? the pek§€ime¥ ais; oer sobm§zéed we? :esooracieom may be ha a owaver, w s gassed m this Ceurt. Shri Vashwani SEagh Tr‘a he Estate submiiied that if mares wading and same has mt heen 2' e Em? wee d spoeed e? w} a a a lemon “war sha§é make mmesenteiioe befm'e ihe 1a?é be coaeidered amd éecéded by the 0d of 2 weeKs §’om ihe d te of rec~ of anwhiie, no coercive steps eihai? be iaken O et§i§oner subm£tted ihai he hes sommied far; ‘ ‘ 1 '13? nie joining m Sub Division Raigarh. ame on accoent of the aforesaid order 3 hefore decidmg reweseatathe 0? x-n ° :ur, §eamed Depoiy Ad‘yiocai‘e Geeeya ‘or eweuoo prefeyred by Hotem Singh is 51$ C3 eo§ded, m that case, foe ori€ées may .n -:,/{_,/ WW mm W 200 (mu) mm 311%?! mm wm %u' aimm $hri Yashwam Singh Thaw r, Deputy Advacate Geaemi for ihe State/ respondents No.1 to 3. W WW, §i1 E3 §, Wm .gE200 WW (Wm mmmm WW1¥WW $Wm aiso befme déciding regreseni’aiion 9f arwar. ssizms made by 3eamed ceumei fef the >sed of with a direcixmn ta tha comemed heermg t9 ihe jaetimmer Wéw??e deciding L4- Q—a’atam $ingh {Sikam/ar as pa! ”the S)§\30.4Q91 ef 2G08. €35 the rewesentgtma . 5d]- ; tr bhirendra Mishra ‘ Judge :59 dimo‘éeé i9 hea? the peiiééonei v'esgcmdem No4 Hoiam Singi’a SR; m View of $he above subm 9a¥€1e$1 the 'msiam peéitmn §s diw: auiwriiiegta a‘fferd oppommw o ?e;\resent‘a€i‘on of respcade‘n’z NI. '§i?ec_.§safi‘s' liq? this Court in WP. (i has not been éecided {aii date. I’.‘