IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 15766 of 2011 Date of Decision: September 2, 2011 Rajeshwar Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE M HON'BLE M HON'BLE M HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE . JUSTICE . JUSTICE . JUSTICE GUR GUR GUR GURDEV SINGH DEV SINGH DEV SINGH DEV SINGH Present: Mr. Saurav Khurana, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. M.M. KUMAR, J. M.M. KUMAR, J. M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for issuance of direction to the respondents to change the date of examination of the ‘Haryana Civil Services (Judicial Branch) Preliminary Examination-2011’, which is to be conducted on 4.9.2011, keeping in view the fact that on the same date ‘the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Services (Preliminary Examination)’ is also being conducted. 2. The petitioner is a candidate for the competitive examination of the ‘Haryana Civil Services (Judicial Branch) Preliminary Examination-2011’. On the ground that on 4.9.2011, the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Services (Preliminary CWP No. 15766 of 2011 2 Examination) is also being held, a request has been made for change of the date as the petitioner would lose the right to appear in one of the two examinations. Similar would be the position with regard to many other candidates. 3. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and are of the view that the aforesaid date fixed by the bodies conducting the examinations could not be changed. It needs no imagination that when a date for conducting examination is fixed then arrangements at large scale have to be prepared keeping in view the large number of candidates who participate in the selection process. Apart from huge expenditure incurred by the examining bodies, huge time is spent by all those who are involved in the conduct of the examination. The change of date of examination after all such arrangements have been made, therefore, is not an easy task. Even otherwise in law there is no room for re-writing the date of examination merely because it is inconvenient to the petitioner nor any such law has been cited before us. There is, thus, no merit in the instant petition. Dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) (M.M. KUMAR) (M.M. KUMAR) (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE (GURDEV SINGH GURDEV SINGH GURDEV SINGH GURDEV SINGH) September 2 September 2 September 2 September 2, 2011 , 2011 , 2011 , 2011 JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE Pkapoor