H^t.ff^ ^^•':T' ^•k>:A.^^-'' ^<^^ z^^" (<»;-•" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR/ W.R N0. B60 /2004 ^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 4. Karim Ullah Khan aged 59 years S/o of Late Abdul Rashid Khan, resident of Masanganj, Near Press Club, Idgah Road, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Raipur (CG) Director, Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh (Pension Bada), Raipur (CG) District Education Officer, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES ?6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANADAMUS CERTIORAI , PROHIBITION AND OR ANY OTHER WRIT/ ORDER/ DIRECTION, ON THE SAME NATURE IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE XI-HC-22 ^TT^T^. ^i<=b3TI^T sh^icti^f^<T 3^r ^I^M^, W1<i^<o, I®«ni<iy 311^1 M5iqi J : N,P.^-^^/^^)4 m 01.04.2005 Shri M.K. Sinha, comi! Shri Saiideep Dub State/ respondents. Heard. This petition was filed a7.1 That, the kindly qua departmentczl enquiry be ^shedas being totally illegal and un-co^stituiionaL Z2 Any oiher Court dee drcujnstar 7.3 CostofPei Leame.d counsel ^for depailmental enquir^7 of completed aad fmal orders document Annexure-A/2 fi (M.W.P. No. 490/2005) 21.2.2005. The document which is tlie fiiial order m question< When the Ghl^I<rt^lTl WT^ff^ te^ <Rl<^l< ^^T^TW^r ^el for tiie petitioner. ^y, Govt. Adyocate for the Ebr foUowing relief:s:- relief, which the Hon'ble fms is to aiuard in the ices of the case. ition.)} the petirtioner subnitts that fhe the petitk>ner hais already beeii }iave been passed. He refers to the fi|ed with an. additional aRpUcation (br disposal of the petitk)n ou l^nnexure-A/2 is dated 11.1.2005 perl|aiiiiiig to tlie depailmental enquiry enquny itself has been_ de^artaiental 'i^^;;^ ^ ^;,.'. XI-HC-22 ^n^T^r 1^N)3TI^T Sb^l^W^cT ^ ^ft,^ ^ ^ •vx^ v5-GC[ HIWTTSD^IC^ '^NKn'ii, ^ft97re, R|<<l|y^< ^-W:^^P/.g?°^ ^ ?; .-,\ .'.w.^:^.yr^- ^^^ f^R^' ^TI^T?^TW^cT -x4 linalized aad fiiial onlers hav reUefs claiaied ia Paras 7.1| mfructaous, By tlie said ^] petitioner has made several eutertaiaed ia the present However, a Ilbert>r is appropriate steps for the reU^fs and also pertauiitig to othje consequence of th.e frnal ord^r Wifh the aforesaicl Ub| loiractuous. Consequently, M.W. F} disposed of. cr>i^^41Ti wr^it ^ te^ <^t^d« ^3Tf^T3TI^T been passed, fhis petition for fhe 7.2 and 7,3 have now becoffle ^ppUcation dated 21.2.2005, the [pi^yers. Those prayers caiinot be pelition. I Igrairted to fhe petitk)ner to take clamied ia tiie|said application ^r iiiatters, which may arise ui dated 11.1.2005. :rty, fhe petitionjis disniissed as No. 490/2005 also staads Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge (^^fepr)