In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Revision No. 305 of 2000 Date of decision: May 19, 2009 Pardeep Kumar .. Petitioner Vs. Jaspal and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. G.S. Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J This revision petition is directed against the judgment dated 4.10.1999 passed by the 1earned Additional Sessions Judge, Nawanshahar, acquitting the accused-respondents of the charges framed against them. Having scrutinized the impugned judgment of acquittal, the revision petition preferred by a private party sans no merits. The trial court appears to have appreciated the entire evidence in the right perspective. The FIR does not contain the name of the accused-respondents. Though, Pardeep Kumar (PW2) has stated that he suffered injuries, yet no medical report has been produced or proved on the record. He has failed to withstand the test of cross examination. His testimony is not worth reliance. The recovery has also not been proved beyond reasonable doubt. Hence, no grounds to interfere. Dismissed. May 19, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge