IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.12002 of 2008. Decided on: 29.12.2010. Shanti Devi. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner. : Mr. Raj Negi, Advocate, vice Mr. B.C.Negi, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P.Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that though he had completed 10 years continuous service and completed 160 days in each calendar year, but her case has not been considered for regularization. It is evident from Annexure R-3 man days chart that the petitioner has neither worked continuously for a period of 10 years nor she has completed 160 days in a block of twelve calendar months. In this case, no direction can be passed to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization. Accordingly, there is no merit in this writ petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 29, 2010. (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No.