IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28065 of 2010 SUBODH KUMAR YADAV S/O LATE LAXMI NARAYAN YADAV R/O VILL/MOHALLA NAVRATAN HATA, P.S. K. HAT, DISTRICT-PURNIA. --PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SMT. NITA DEVI, W/O SRI SUBODH KUMAR YADAV, PRESENTLY RESIDE AT BATHNAHA, P.S. JANKI NAGAR, DISTRICT-PURNIA. --OPP.PARTY 2 01.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in this complaint case, being husband of the complainant. Earlier, his prayer was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 17.5.2010 passed in Cr.Misc. 14939 of 2010. Now the petitioner has come with assertion that dispute between the parties has already been resolved and, accordingly, petition of compromise has been filed on 05.7.2010. If it is so and the complainant by appearing in person, on due identification, admits the factum of compromise the court below shall permit the petitioner to continue company of the complainant and have a regular watch over their conduct for a reasonable period and after 2 satisfaction pass appropriate order. In the meanwhile, the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, first class, Purnia, in Complaint Case no. 1098 of 2001, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present before the court below on each and every date for one year or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioner fails to remain on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad