IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 1674 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 1674 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 1674 OF 2009 Shri Pandharinath Akkaram Gaikwad. ... Petitioner. V/s. Sou.Shevanta Yeshwant Gaikwad and others. ... Respondents. Tejpal S. Ingale for the petitioner. A.I.Patel, AGP for respondent Nos.6 to 8. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 23rd January 2009. DATED: 23rd January 2009. DATED: 23rd January 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos.6 to 8. Perused record. 2. This petition is directed against the order dated 31st December, 2008 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Pune Region, Pune, whereby an appeal filed by the petitioner came to be dismissed and the order passed by the Additional Collector, Sangli dated 15th November, 2008 came to be confirmed. 3. The only grievance made against the impugned order is that the said order was communicated to the petitioner on 20th January, 2008 and, simultaneously, meeting was convened for holding elections on 23rd January, 2009, leaving no time to the petitioner to challenge the action impugned herein. 4. Having seen the impugned order, no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order since no challenge on merit is made out except saying that the order was communicated late. The record reveals that almost all the members have voted against the petitioner. He had notice of the meeting. He was heard. Order is reasoned order. View taken therein is a reasonable and possible view. 5. In the result, petition is dismissed in limine since no merit is involved. No order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)