1 ao705,705,707-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.705 OF 2010 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 894 OF 2010 AND APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.706 OF 2010 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 895 OF 2010 AND APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.707 OF 2010 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.897 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. ..... Mr.Jagdish N. Jayale for the appellant. Ms. Milli Thakkar i/b. Mr. R. V. Thakkar for respondent No.2. Mr. Munir Merchant for respondent No.3. Mr. A. R. Patil, AGP for respondent No.1. ..... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : MARCH 9, 2011 P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel appearing for 2 ao705,705,707-10 the parties. The challenge in this Appeal is to the order refusing to grant of ad-interim injunction. 2. The structure in possession of the appellant has already been demolished. Thus now some of the reliefs in the Notice of Motion cannot be granted. The other reliefs sought therein are of drastic nature and the same will have to be considered by the Trial Court while deciding the Notice of Motion. The reliefs which are of mandatory nature cannot be granted at this stage when the Notice of Motion is still pending. No interference is called for at this stage. 3. Hence, the Appeals are disposed of by directing that the Notice of Motion pending in the trial Court be disposed of as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks from today. 3 ao705,705,707-10 4. All contentions of the parties on merits are kept open and the Notice of Motion shall be decided on its own merits without being influenced by the tentative observations made in the impugned order. 5. Civil Application Nos. 894 of 2010, 895 of 2010 and 897 of 2010 do not survive and the same are disposed of. JUDGE