IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18151 of 2010 Jairam Paswan Versus The Union Of India & Ors ----------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For Union of India: Mr. P.L.Jaiswal,CGC For N. V.S. : M/s. J.P.Karn & Siddhartha Prasad Advocates For the State : Mr. Amrendra Kumar,AC to GP 8 ----- 8. 25.07.2011 This matter has been listed under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the behest of the Counsel for the State and the School. It is submitted that an observation of this Court at page 3 of the order dated 5.7.2011 is being misconstrued as an imputation of the inability of the Counsel to assist the Court properly. An order of the Court has to be read in its entirety. It is not permissible to cull out lines from an order of the Court, and then read it torn out of context. The order dated 5.7.2011 is but the reflection of the able assistance rendered by the Counsel appearing for the respective contesting parties. A Counsel assists the Court on basis of instructions received. Counsel for the respondents satisfied the Court of the jurisdiction in the respondents to subject the petitioner to a medical test. What was left unanswered by the respondents was the justification to do so without doubting or rejecting the documentary proof of age submitted by the petitioner. The reference to „lack of assistance‟ has to be read and understood in that background. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)