1 (Cri appln 3033 of 2009) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3033 OF 2009 Mr.Raajaysh Chetwal ...Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents ----- Mr.Bhupendra Mishra for the Applicant Ms. Li Shu Jen i/b Mr. Suresh Chandrashekar for Respondent No.2 Mr.Rajesh More -APP for the State ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED:30TH NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant, the learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 and the learned APP for the State. 2. This is an application for quashing the criminal complaint being C.C. No. 521/PS/2005 pending before the 9th Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court at Bandra by consent of the Complainant. 3. It is submitted that parties have arrived at the 2 (Cri appln 3033 of 2009) settlement and terms of settlement have been signed by both the parties and their respective advocates which is annexed at Exhibit ‘A’ to this application. The Complainant and the Applicant both are present in the Court. The Complainant has stated before me that she has no objection if the complaint is quashed. She has also stated that she has received all the amount mentioned in the terms of settlement. 5. Since the dispute between the parties is a personal one and they have now amicably settled the dispute and in view of the judgments of the Apex Court in the cases of Jagdish Chanana vs. State of Haryana and Anr. [AIR 2008 SC 1968], Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab [AIR 2008 SC 1969], B.S. Joshi vs. State of Haryana [AUR 2003 SC 1386] there is no reason why the said complaint should be remained pending in the Court of the 9th Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. 6. In this view of the matter, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and the application is, accordingly, disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.)