1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9783 OF 2010 Subhash s/o Janardhan Kedar ...Petitioner Versus The Manager Universal Luggage Airstcrated Company & Ors ...Respondents ..... Mr. D.R. Jayabhar, advocate for the petitioner ..... CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 15TH NOVEMBER, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2 This petition takes exception to the concurrent findings recorded by the courts below that the petitioner has filed proceedings before the Labour Court after a gap of 13 years from the date of cause of action. Counsel appearing for the petitioner vehemently argued that since the respondents had given assurances to the petitioner and the petitioner was waiting for outcome of said assurances and therefore, no proceedings were filed before the Labour court within prescribed period of limitation. 2 3 I have carefully perused the findings recorded by the courts below. I find that there is inordinate delay of 13 years in filing of the proceedings before the Labour Court. In my view, by any stretch of imagination, the inordinate delay, as is caused in the instant case of 13 years, cannot be countenanced and therefore, in my opinion, no case is made out to entertain the present writ petition. 4 In the result, writ petition stands dismissed summarily. *****