1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 928 OF 2011 *** 1. Heard Advocate Mr. Barde. The Industrial Court has found that the petitioner was not in service from 1983 to 1996. Learned counsel contends that Industrial Court has erroneously placed burden of proof upon petitioner. The best material to show completion or otherwise of 240 days was in custody of employer and in response to notice to produce documents, respondent employer admitted that they have no documents in this respect. 2. The case was for grant of permanency and regularisation. The petitioner was not in service on the date of filing of complaint. Moreover, even initial burden to prove completion of 240 days is not discharged by her. 3. I do not see any jurisdictional error or perversity. Writ petition is rejected. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:23/02/2011. ans/928