u IBti IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANT APPELLANT 1. ^ f ^/v\ ^vy/^ ^ f ^l - .y:./. ^//^ "1/./A^ -?&-' /f\' ^ w 5. 7 RESPONDENT NONAPPLICANT M.C.C.No...'y^S... /2Q 1_1 fArising Out of Second Apoeal No.318^19971 Bodhan Prasad Son of Bhagwantin Pathak, Resident of Kusmi, Tahsil Bemefara District-Durg (.M.P.) Now (C.G.) (Diedon 01-03-2011) Kamal Narayan,Aged 32 years (at peresent 64 years) S/o Late Bodhan Prasad Pathak Prem Kumar, Aged 28 years (at peresent 58 years) S/o Late Bodhan Prasad Pathak Krishna Kant, Aged 24 years . (at peresent 56 years) S/o ,L'ate Bodhan Prasad Pathak Ramakant, Aged 22 years All resedentof House No. 12/340, Gole Bazar, Telepara Ward, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) ' (Died on 06-07-2003) Smt. Leelabai, wife ofJagdish Pathak, Resident of Kusmi, Tahsil Bemetara, District- Durg (C,G.) (Dead) ThroughLegal Resubstituted 4-*-^~ YuleorderDated^ 16-12-96 ^De^ ^Smt. Subhadra Dubey, widow of~^> Baban Prasad Dubey, daughter ofJagdish Pathk, Resident of.Village-Kusmi, Tahsil Bemetara, District-Durg (C.G.) Ramadhar, Son ofMahanlal Pathak Aged 55 Years (S^J f*-^ Resident of Village-Kusmi Tahsil Bemetara District- Durg (M.P.) Now (C.G.) VERSUS ^Smt. Triveni, wife ofShivrafan Pathak, Ag^d 65 years,resident ofvillage Kusmi Tahsil Bemetara, District-Durg (C.G.) APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 41'RULE 11(2( READ WITH RULE-19 OF THE CODE OFL ClVIL PROCEDURE FOR RESTORATION OF SECOND^ APPEAL No.'-SlS of 1997.WHICH WAS DISMISSED ON tS€f07/2011 IN DEFAULT FORNON- PROSECUTION TheApplicant/Appellantnamedabove, submits asunder:- pe^- an^'s qir (<;•)[+ vn ai^r sb4i<<> -1 \ »N^^ v- WBO^*ih ga'TORT, 's'sr 't<Mw<i, ws\wi'c, [sidiy^< ^^.......^.^.....l^£...(.f...W( 200 an^r Ti?q? ('^^fs^fj 'RSIW ^ifcr sii^r ^ Y^ (^" w Hojl^le Shri Prashant Kumar M 30.11.2011 Shri J.N. Nande, counsel fo l-1eardon I.A. No.1 for application. For the reasons assiffhed ii the applicant has been able to e> application. I.A. No.1 for condonation of Also heard on application which was dismissed for want of p| On due consideration an< restoration application, this MCC i^ Theorderdated 6/07/2011 S.A.No.318/1997isrestor< tiiifiiili Twi?if 4 ft%t <P!|(<;|< i? sjfgii dii^iji fehra.J.. ' the applicant. cond(?nation of delay in filing the restoration application, this court is satisfied that x^lain the delay in filing the restoration fdelay isallowed. Ifor restoration of S.A. No. 318/1997, tosecution on 6/07/2011. for the reasons mentioned in the allowed. |s recalled. >d to its original number. —&"5" -I''S/I40—2/2011—1,50,000.