IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 22ND MARCH 2011 / 1ST CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 8960 of 2011(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. MYMOONA.E., HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT, (MALAYALAM), PALORA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PALORA, ULLIYERI, VIA KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. REJISH KUMAR.K.R., PEON, PALORA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PALORA, ULLIYERI, VIA KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. SHAINI.N.K., FULL TIME MENIAL, PALORA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PALORA, ULLIYERI, VIA KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE MANAGER, PALORA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PALORA, ULLIYERI, VIA KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THAMARASSERI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE. 4. STATE OF KERALA, RPE.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 8960 Of 2011-T ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 22nd DAY OF MARCH, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioners are seeking for approval of their appointments in the respective posts to which they were appointed as per Exhibits P1, P2 and P3 appointment orders. 2. The District Educational Officer rejected the approval as per Exhibits P4 to P6 orders against which the petitioners have filed appeals before the Deputy Director of Education as Exhibits P9 to P11. The Manager has also filed an appeal as per Exhibit P12. The petitioners have pointed out in the Writ Petition that with regard to the dispute between two persons for management of the school, an interim order has been granted by this Court in W.P.(C)No.31525/10 on 8.11.2010. 3. It is upto the Deputy Director of Education to take a decision in the appeals filed before him after hearing the parties. Therefore, there will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to take a decision on Exhibits P9 to P12 appeals, after hearing the petitioner and the Manager, within a period of six weeks from the W.P.(C)No. 8960/11 -2- date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioners can also rely on Exhibit P7 interim order before the appellate authority. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. SD/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn True copy P.A.to Judge