IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.376 of 2010 DINESH RAI SON OF SRI RAMASHISH RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- UFARPURA, P.S.- DANAPUR, DISTRICT- PATNA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 9 25.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This revision application is directed against the judgment and order of conviction dated 11.12.2009 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court no. III, Patna in Cr. Appeal no. 96/97/60/06. Petitioner was found in possession of one country made pistol and 03 live cartridges which gave rise to Tr. No. 931 of 1996 of the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna. On conclusion of the trial and after appreciating the evidence brought on record, learned Trial Court convicted the petitioner under Section 25(1-B)A of the Arms Act and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 01 year. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and order, petitioner preferred the appeal which was heard and dismissed with modification in sentence. Learned lower Appellate Court, by the impugned judgment, has reduced the sentence from 01 year to 06 months. This Court perused the two judgments rendered by the learned two Courts below. Learned Trial Court critically evaluated evidence of P.W. 2(I.O.), P.W.3 (informant) and P.W. 4 and found them reliable and trustworthy. Learned Appellate Court having reevaluated the evidence concurred with the finding of the 2 learned Trial Court. Having regard to the circumstances appearing from the record, the sentence was reduced to 06 months. This Court finds absolutely no illegality and/or infirmity in the order impugned. There is no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )