,&ff IN THE HIGH G6Ui^i^®aaBlGA»lttEJCT BILASPUR ::'^ '. :^ •'.'..::'; ^HHATilSG»RH^;%:"':^-:::' v'"s:;" MISC. CIVIL GASE N0M_ OF 2005 ARPUCANT .<--£'..-...;' ' :: ; -.... ' ' ' laipur Development Authority, ^'l^he tiody inccti-porated ^nder «^1§^(^;^hattisgarh NagarTaffia Gram B^MI'^''^y</ Mivt><;h Arthinivam-1ff73. Havina- ^ 1^< il ../" ^•-,% .••* ^ J^t -•*' ^•y ^yy Chief Executive Officer, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Ji?'^ ^ VERSUS NON-APPLICANTC «4^Ajay Siridhwani, S/6 Shri Ramji Das,3awaharNagar, Raipur[CG] ^fc State_ of Chhattegarh thrQygh ^Fhe Secretary, Environmeht & Urban DevelopmentDepartinent Mantralaya, Dau Katyan Singh BKawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3< The Munidpal Corporation Rajpur^a body^ inm Hnder -Sec.-7 of C G Municipal Cprporation Act; 1956, having Ite office at Malviya Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Ms »•% ARRIJCATIONI:ORi@<BENSB@Na©l:1-lMgFC»R£6M»LETIN6 ::.-:THE;PROCEED]^6^ttg®iiBiiffiENeE®FiJaiU;^ltllW^ED:^^ ';.:^^-o2-2^^pA|s|in^@^g|tirBi^^ :.-^/^wiiig^^^ l;%?:;:.'"-;;l^'-^-:'':l;:^.'^^^ t^K|TheApplicant,namedabove, rnost •pggjectfully_begsJQ-submU XI-HC-78 an^r^irf^ira; (W SH^T sb*(i'=n s tTWttlSb*llcb 3^ ^iFn?ra', siTftwR', Px'ii'My fft.c-c. ^~1£'- 58/-ZOO& ^..................... ^ 200 gn^?r qsra? (icit3c"<,iT) g.RirwHfia'w^r Shri Manlndra Sliriv; Adv. for the applicant. Shri P. Diwakar, Sr. fidv. with Shri P.R, Pataiikar, Adv. for ttie respondent no. 1. Shri Prashant Mishr, Deo, Govt. Adv. for the Sta . Heai-d. therdin This is an applicatioiji the proceedings in compliatnce by tlus Court in W.P. 507/1 While disposing of th{ pven to fhe petitioner before the Raipi.lr Develop4ient was to be decided bv the Rs period of tivo months representation in accordan) Counsel for fhe passed in time but subseqi4ently Since orders have t) petition has become infrucljuous The petition is dismisj petlti<|)ner infruclluous q,raf?f?frTwRii-'fffetA liSfKir ^3lf^T3n^?r stava, Sr, Adv. with Sint. Smita Ghai, , Addl. Adv. General with Shri U.N.S. ;e. (i for extension of tmie for completin^ of order dated 15-2-2005 passed £003. W.P. No. 507/2003, a direction was jin to submit a si.iitable representation Authority within 15 davs, which (ipur Development Authority, within a from the date of receipt of the ;e with resolution. submits fbat orders could not be (entty orders have been passed. |een passed by the petitioner, this ed as infructuous. Sd<- Fakhruddin Judge P.T.O.