IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A No. 2325 of 2006 Date of decision : November 25, 2008 Surajbhan, ...... Appellant. through Mr.S.K.Yadav, Advocate for Mr.R.D.Yadav, Advocate v. Smt. Chotti Devi & others, ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This appeal has been filed against concurrent judgments of the Courts below decreeing the suit of respondents No.1 to 4 for restraining the appellant and respondent No.5 from encroaching upon the land, owned by respondents No.1 to 4. Both Courts have arrived at a finding of fact, on the basis of the report of the Local Commissioner (Field Kanungo) Ex.PW1/D, which they have preferred to the report Ex.DW4/A, filed by the appellant, since the author of that report admitted that he did not demarcate the neighbouring plots but only demarcated the plot owned by the appellant and that he did not associate any body else with the preparation of that report. In my opinion, no infirmity can be found by the reliance placed by the Courts below on the report of the Local Commissioner, who was RSA No.2325 of 2006 :2: appointed without objection from the appellant. In view of these findings of fact, the questions of law proposed in this appeal do not arise for consideration. The appeal is consequently dismissed with no order as to costs. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 25 , 2008. JUDGE `kk'