IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WPMS No. 282 of 2009 Devendra Singh Bisht ....... Petitioner. Versus Collector of Nainital and others. .............. Respondents Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent no. 1 and 2. Mr. K.K. Shah, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 25th February, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. The petitioner, admittedly, had taken a loan Rs. 2.6 lacs as cash credit limit and term loan of Rs. 2.4 lacs from Central Bank of India under Khadi and Village Industries Commission Scheme, which he failed to return and consequently, earlier a writ petition bearing No. 1452 of 2008 (MS) was filed by the petitioner, in which vide order dated 10th September, 2008 an indulgence was granted to the petitioner inasmuch as three easy installments of equal amount were fixed for payment of loan. 2. The counsel for the petitioner is present admittedly, the petitioner failed to pay the installments, which were fixed by this Court in time. Hence, recovery proceedings was initiated by the respondent Bank and a recovery citation was issued by the Tehsildar, Haldwani / respondent no. 2 on 16.2.2009 against the petitioner. 3. Aggrieved, the petitioner has challenged the recovery citation dated 16.2.2009. Once again, petitioner is a defaulter of payment of loan amount as earlier he was granted indulgence and installments for repayment of loan amount were fixed. The petitioner has again committed a default by not paying the loan amount, no indulgence is liable to be given to the petitioner. 4. Writ petition is totally devoid of any merit and is hereby dismissed. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 25.2.2009 Rathour