1 WP 2422/2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2422 OF 2005 Sainath Mahadu Pujarwad ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. ... Respondents. ----- Shri. S.B. Talekar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri. V.B. Ghatge, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent No.1. Shri. Anupkumar Pardeshi holding for Shri. R.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No.4. ------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE: 6th JULY 2009 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The learned counsel Shri. S.B. Talekar submits that though the petitioner was at Sr. No. 1, for want of Caste Validity Certificate, which was issued later on, he could not be appointed 2 WP 2422/2005 and in place of the petitioner, the next candidate from the select list i.e. Respondent No.4 herein, was appointed as the petitioner could not submit the Caste Validity Certificate in time. The learned counsel submitted that, the Zilla Parishad be directed to appoint the petitioner in place of respondent No.4. 3) Just because the petitioner could not submit the Caste Validity Certificate in time, it would not be appropriate now after 4 to 5 years to direct respondent No.2 to appoint the petitioner in place of respondent No.4. The petitioner is entitled to apply in case advertisement is issued in future. 4) The writ petition is disposed of. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.2422.05