IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-24686 of 2009 Date of Decision: November 12, 2009 Sukhender …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana. …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present: Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. Neena Madan, Addl. A.G., Haryana. S.D. Anand, J. (Oral) The essential foundational premise of the prosecution allegation that Jai Chand died on account of head injury given to him by the petitioner is falsified by the medical documentation which only indicates three injures – one on left shoulder and two on the elbow. The medical officer, who conducted the post mortem examination, had already been examined as PW9 and his opinion is also not in accord with the presentation made by the investigating agency. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the petition shall stand allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, concerned. November 12, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge