IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:10082 of 2002 Between: Philomena Education Foundation of India, Rep. by it's Trustee Dr.Philomena, 6-3-1089, Somajuguda, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Commissioner, Appeals, Office of Commissioner of Land Reforms, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. 2 The Special Officer & Competent Authority, Urban Land Cellings, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:NONE APPEARED The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying aﬃdavit, it is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ declaring that holding the entire property held by the petitioner in premises 6-3-1089 Somajiguda, Hyderabad is protected under the Act and consequently set aside the orders passed by the 2nd Respondent in Proceedings No.G1/12033/76 dt.20.11.2000 as well by the 1st Respondent in Appeal No.154/2000 dt.6.5.2002.” On 14.10.2008, when the case was called, no one appeared for the petitioner. Therefore, it was adjourned for today with the direction to post the same under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, at the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting it’s case. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition in default, WPMP.No.6428 of 2004 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 16th OCTOBER, 2008. kvni