IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2009 / 3RD ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 35235 of 2008(T) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- R.RAJU, IST GRADE DRAFTSMAN,P.W.D(ROADS) SUB DIVISION, VAIKOM, S/O RAGHAVAN, ASARIPARAMBIL, THOTTAKOM, VAIKOM, DIST.KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. MR.K.REGHU KOTTAPPURAM. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, L.S.G.D, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, P.W.D -ADMINISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.W.D.(ROADS), SUB DIVISION, VAIKOM,DIST.KOTTAYAM. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.W.D.(R0ADS), DIVISION, KOTTAYAM. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. ANTONY MUKKATH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/06/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.35235/2008-T: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE DTD. 24/11/08. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE ORDER G.O.E9/01/08/CE/LSGD DTD. 23/09/08. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE ORDER NO. EB4/17686/04 DTD. 05/03/05. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE ORDER NO. EB4/1938/08 DTD. 26/03/08. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------- W.P(C) No. 35235 of 2008-T ------------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of June, 2009. J U D G M E N T The issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered against the petitioner by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Manju Balakrishnan & others V. State of Kerala & others (2009(2) KHC 492). The writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. If the petitioner has any grievance regarding the station to which he is posted, it will open to him to file an appropriate representation before the Government. In the event of such a representation is being filed, the Government shall consider the same and pass final orders thereon within three months from the date on which such a representation is received by the Government. The Government shall while passing orders on the representation take note of the fact that the petitioner has only less than three years of service left. The writ petition is dismissed with the above observations. Sd/- P.N.RAVINDRAN JUDGE //True Copy// PA to Judge ab