d^^ ^ :MPK '.n^fs IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S)No. <3^&f OF 2010. PETITIONERS ,.^ ^o^ ^^y ^y ^^ ^' .0" ^ •<~ ^- ^^^ "'<^«;.^.--' s.^:J^ :1. Mahadev Patel, S/o. late Shri Shiv Ratan Lal Pate, aged about 47 years, Occupation Head Master, Govt. Primary School Hardibhata, Block Nagri, District Dhamtari (C. G.) l^ Smt. Janki Chhedaiya, W/o. Shri Sukhu Ram Chhedaiya, aged about 47 years, Occupation Head Master, Govt. Primary School Karra Ghati, Block Nagri Dista-ict Dhamtari (C. G.) 3. Amar Nath Yadu, S/o. Ram Singh Yadu, aged about 50 years, Occupation Head Master, Govt. Primary School Shahanikhar, Block Nagri, District Dhamtari (C. G.) 4. Ramesh Kumar Yadav, S/o. Shri Itwari Ram Yadav, aged about 46 years, Occupation Head Master, Govt. Primary School Kotabharri, Block Nagri, District Dhamtari (C. G.) 5. Hanumant lal Sinha, S/o. late Shri Gaya Ram Sinha, aged about 43 years, Occupation Head Master, Govt. Primary School Madamsilli, Block Nagri, District Dhamtari (C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, School Education Departtment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) ^' 2. District Education Officer, Dhamtari, District Dharatari (C.G.) 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C. G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •!!• .<*'"• I-HC—78 sn^i ^i R-fi'* ^^ 'STT^T giWct) Tumar® •dTCI "lll'LIMq, Snlly'Tti, [s<diy^< ..^i(:s;.r^.:.ivii.y.^.. ?T'M^r(' SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan 15-07^010 Shri Somkant Verma, counsel Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel L^' advance copy. Heard. Learned oounsel for the petitic| were working as Assistant Teache| Master whereas number of Assistanl Upper Division Teacher, Learned submits that the petitioners have concerried respondent authority stati|ig Upper Division Teacher. Without cammenting on the interest of justice, it would be propei| authority to oonsider petitioners same, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid direction, cM<LtFt:1<ft*T TIT^ff ^' fe^ -(,f<ift^:r< ^Tatiwail^l Shrivastava. J. for the petitioners. wyer for the State/respondents on jner submits that the petitioners, who ^s, have been promoted as Head t Teachers have been promoted as lcounsel for the petitioners further |inade a represerrtatfon before the that they should be promoted as ntierits of the petitioners claim, in the to dirast the concerned respondent repr^sentation and take deoision on the th^ petition is finally disposed of. Sd/- ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge