IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11205 of 2011 MITHLESH SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 28.04.2011 It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the prayer partition of the bail petition, inadvertently, “Sessions Trial No. 83 of 2010” has wrongly been mentioned in place of “Sessions Trial No. 83 of 2011” and similarly, same mistake crept up in the order dated 19.04.2011. Accordingly, he prays to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the bail application. Prayer is allowed. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer partition of the bail application during course of the day. Accordingly, the order dated 19.04.2011 is modified to the extent that “Sessions Trial No. 83 of 2010” be read as “Sessions Trial No. 83 of 2011”. Let the order be communicated to the court of Additional Sessions Judge-Ist, Bhagalpur in connection with Sessions Trial No. 83 of 2011 arising out of Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 78 of 2010 through fax at the cost of the petitioner. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)