CRLR No.113/05 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. (Delay Condonation Appln. No.1249/10) (Recall Appln. No.939/10) Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for the revisionist. Mr. TS Phartyal, Adv. for the respondent no.5/applicant. For the reasons stated, delay condonation application is allowed. Delay in filing the recall application is condoned. Also heard on the recall application. By way of this recall application, the applicant seeks to recall the judgment and order dated 14.12.2009 passed by this Court, which has been passed on merits. I have perused the said judgment and order. On the said date when the case was listed, the name of the counsel appearing for the applicant was printed in the cause list and this fact is also admitted between the parties. However, when the case was called out, the counsel for the applicant/ respondent no.5 was not present and hence the court proceeded to pass the aforesaid order. Besides, there is no provision under the law to recall a judgment and order which has been passed on merits. The Court has decided the revision on its merits after a thorough analysis of the matter and even there is no ground to recall the said judgment and order. Accordingly, I do not find any force in the recall application and the same is accordingly rejected. (D.V., J.) 09.11.2010 Rajeev Dang