WP(C) 4711/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI This writ petition has been filed seeking the Court’s intervention for due consi deration of the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment following t he death of his father which had occurred in the year 1998. The norms which are to guide such consideration were elaborately laid down by the Court in its order dated 3.8.2006 passed in WP' No. 3875/2005 and other connected cases. As a one time measure all pending cases were also directed to be considered. The grievanc e of the writ petitioner is that inspite of a proposal being submitted to the Re spondent No.3 i.e. the Deputy Commissioner, Sivasagar on 26.2.2007 by the Depart ment, his case for compassionate appointment has not been considered. The affidavit filed today by the Deputy Commissioner, Sivasagar would go so show that the a meeting of the District Level Committee was held on 13.12.20 07 in which the name of the petitioner was recommended. Under the norms laid dow n by this Court by its order dated 3.8.2006 the matter will now be required to be considered by the State Level Committee. In the affidavit filed by the Deput y Commissioner, Sivasagar explanations have also been offered as to why the case of the petitioner could not be considered earlier. Without expressing any opini on on the explanations furnished, as the case of the petitioner has now be en recommended to the State Level committee, the writ petition is closed with a dir ection that the State Level Committee will consider the entitlement of the petit ioner for compassionate appointment in its next meeting. The result of such cons ideration will, thereafter, be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition shall stand closed in terms of the above direction.