1 C.W.P. No. 5909 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH --- . 5909 2010 Civil Writ Petition No of : 7, 2010 Date of Decision April Union Bank of India --- Petitioner Versus Chandigarh Administration through its Administrator and others --- Respondents : CORAM . HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL *** PRESENT: . . . , Mr K K Goel Advocate . for the petitioner . , Mr Sanjay Kaushal Advocate . 1 3. for respondent Nos to --- , . AJAY KUMAR MITTAL J 226/227 In this petition filed under Articles of the , Constitution of India the petitioner has , inter alia prayed for , . 2 issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondent Nos 2 C.W.P. No. 5909 of 2010 3 12.1.2010 and to issue certified copy of order dated vide , . 5,64,605/- which misuse charges amounting to Rs have , been imposed for misuse of the premises in the matter titled “ , . as Estate Officer Chandigarh Vs Partap Kaur and others” , , pending before the Assistant Estate Officer UT Chandigarh and also the certified copies of all the orders passed 12.1.2010 subsequent to the order dated in the aforesaid . matter , In response to notice of motion written statement . on behalf of the respondents has been filed . , Mr Sanjay Kaushal learned Senior Standing . 1 3 Counsel for respondent Nos to states that certified copies of the orders asked for by the petitioner have already . been supplied to it This fact has not been controverted by . the counsel for the petitioner , In view of the above the writ petition has been . rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such Learned counsel for the petitioner states that an 12.1.2010 appeal against the aforesaid order dated shall be 3 C.W.P. No. 5909 of 2010 filed within a week and the petitioner is genuinely , apprehending that till it was so done the respondents may / seal the site building and in that even the very purpose of . preferring the appeal would stand frustrated in this view of , the matter and having regard to the interest of justice it is / ordered that sealing of the site building in question will not . be done for a week from today This interim relief shall not be construed as an expression of opinion of this Court on . the primary controversy between the parties ( ) AJAY KUMAR MITTAL 7, 2010 April JUDGE * * RKMALIK