IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11900/2008 Decided on:27.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Sunil Kumar. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Pravesh, Advocate vice Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he has worked as Helper with effect from 1990 to 1993. Thereafter with effect from 6.2.1993 he has continuously worked as Pump Operator for more than ten years with 240 days in each calendar year. However, the respondents instead of regularizing the petitioner as Pump Operator regularized him as Helper on 21.7.2004. Case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Gauri 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 Dutt and others versus State of H.P., reported in Latest HLJ 2008 HP 306. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to seek option of the petitioner to be regularized against the post against which he has worked for larger period, i.e. Pump Operator. He is entitled to all the consequential benefits. Needful be done within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 27.12.2010 *awasthi*