IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33077 of 2009 ANIRUDH PRASAD YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 16/09/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. That co-accused may have been granted anticipatory bail subsequent to the rejection of the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner cannot make out a fresh ground for reconsideration of the prayer for anticipatory bail. It is a matter of common knowledge that adverse bail orders are not placed before the Bench when subsequent bail matters are heard. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merits preferably on the date that he surrenders keeping in mind that certain others had subsequently been granted anticipatory bail by this Court, without being prejudiced by the present order. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)