IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24539 of 2010 DIPAK RAM @ BIPIN RAM . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 05. 02.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner in a Police Case under Section 364(A), 307, 372, 216, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act renews his prayer for bail on the 5th occasion. No sufficient ground has been made out to reconsider the prayer for bail. It is next submitted that in view of the report at Flag-A, the trial may be directed to be expedited. Witnesses appear to be forthcoming. Let the trial be expedited. The prosecuting agency is obliged to forthwith execute any summons/warrant for appearance of witnesses as may be directed by the trial court, failing which this Court may be inclined to take a serious view of the matter, if it is otherwise reported. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)