sajay IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE. ORIGINAL SIDE. ORIGINAL SIDE. COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 833 OF 2006 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 538 OF 1999 ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memorandum of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearances, Courts’ : orders or directions : Prothonotaries orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ Ms.Shakuntala Joshi for the applicant. None for the respondent. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 9th March 2007. DATED: 9th March 2007. DATED: 9th March 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . In spite of the best efforts, the respondent- Company could not be served. Hence heard in absence of the respondent. . For the reasons stated in the affidavit, application for amendment is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. . If the respondent feels aggrieved by this order, liberty to seek review of this order. . In the result, company application is made absolute in terms of this order with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)