IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2009 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 11858 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.RAMACHANDRAN, S/O.LATE CHELLAPPAN, AGED 59, KALPAKAVADI, KAMALESWARAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.PRADEEP RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SECRETARY, TAXATION & FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (BUILDINGS & ROADS), PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, NEAR MUSEUM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENDING ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROADS & BRIDGES, SOUTH CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. THE SUPERINTENDENDING ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, BUILDINGS AND LOCAL WORKS, SOUTH CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. S.DEEPU, S/O.SUDARSANAN, PARAVOOR KIZHAKKAKOM, VAKKOM.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. MR.P.N.SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.11858 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 8th day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T The complaint is basically regarding the conduct of the 7th respondent in allegedly lending his name to others for getting contracts, which are reserved for those who belonging to Scheduled Caste category. 2. According to the petitioner, the 7th respondent has been misusing his name and on that basis undeserving people are availing of benefits, which are meant for Scheduled Caste category alone. It is stated that raising this complaint, the petitioner has filed Ext.P8 before the Tender Committee comprising of 2nd, 3rd & 4th respondents. 3. Taking into account the case of the petitioner regarding the pendency of Ext.P8 representation filed by him before the Tender Committee and without expressing anything on the merits of the case pleaded, I direct the petitioner to produce a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition before the Tender Committee, in which event, the Tender Committee shall consider the complaint, with notice to the 7th respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg