IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 9TH OCTOBER 2009 / 17TH ASWINA 1931 RP.No. 944 of 2009(M) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.14970/2009 Dated 16/07/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS IN WPC. --------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHACKO VARGHESE,S/O.P.C.VARGHESE, BUSINESSMAN,PULLAT HOUSE,PALOORKAV P.O., THEKKEMALA,PERUVANTHANAM VILLAGE, PEERUMEDU TALUK. 2. P.K.SREEDHARAN,S/O.KANDAN, AGRICULTURIST,PUTHENPURACKAL HOUSE, KONGADU,PERUVANTHANAM VILLAGE, PEERUMEDU TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAVEENDRAN SRI.ANIL KUMAR M.SIVARAMAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS IN WPC. ------------------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY,DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KERALA STATE,OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL),OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL),IDUKKI,PAINAVU. 4. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL),PEERUMEDU,IDUKKI DISTRICT. RP NO.944/09 -2- 5. THE INSPECTOR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), PEERUMEDU P.O.,IDUKKI DISTRICT. 6. THE PERUVANTHANAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.K.186,REP.BY THE SECRETARY, PERUVANTHANAM P.O.685 532,IDUKKI DISTRICT. 7. THE SECRETARY, PERUVANTHANAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.186,PERUVANTHANAM P.O.685 532, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 8. ALEX THOMAS, POWATH HOUSE,PERUVANTHANAM P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT. 9. P.D.THOMAS, PALLIKKUNNEL HOUSE,PERUVANTHANAM P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT. 10. V.C.DEVASIA, VADAKKEL HOUSE,PERUVANTHANAM P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT. 11. BABY MATHEW, KUMBALAMTHANAM,PERUVANTHANAM P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT. 12. MUHAMMED NISSAR P.Y., PARAKKAL HOUSE,PERUVANTHANAM P.O.685 532, IDUKKI DISTRICT. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.SANILKUMAR SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC FOR R6 AND R7. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ R.P.No.944 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) NO. 14970 OF 2009 (M) ===================== Dated this the 9th day of October, 2009 O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the review petitioners, the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 5 and the learned standing counsel appearing for respondents 6 and 7. 2. Review of the judgment in WP(C) No.14970/09 is what is sought for. A reading of the judgment itself show that when the matter was heard, all that was sought for by the petitioner was a direction to the Administrator to expedite the election to the Managing Committee of the Society. It was accordingly that direction was issued to take expeditious steps for the conduct of the election. Therefore, no error whatsoever has been made out, calling for review of the judgment. Therefore, there is no merit in this review petition. It is accordingly dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp