1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No.2606 of 2006 W I T H Writ Petition No.2605 of 2006 ----- WRIT PETITION NO.2606 OF 2006 Smt.Suvarna Mohan Kamble. .. .. Petitioner v/s. 1. The President /Secretary, Jeevan Vikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal & ors. .. .. Respondents Mr.V.V. Purwant for petitioner. Mr.Nitin Jamdar for respondent nos.3 & 4. Mr.Surel Shah for respondent no.1. Mr.P.P.Kakade, AGP for respondent nos.5 to 8. ------ W I T H WRIT PETITION NO.2605 OF 2006 Smt.Aarti Sadashiv Nannajkar .. .. Petitioner v/s. 2. The President /Secretary, Jeevan Vikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal & ors. .. .. Respondents Mr.V.V. Purwant for petitioner. Mr.Nitin Jadhav h/f Mr.Nitin Jamdar for respondent nos.3 & 4. Mr.Surel Shah for respondent no.1. Mr.P.P.Kakade, AGP for respondent nos.5 to 8. 2 ----- CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. Dated : 27 th February 2008 P.C. : 1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners in both the petitions and learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that main relief prayed for in these petitions has already been granted. Both the petitioners have been absorbed in the school as prayed for by them. The petitioners are now claiming arrears of their salary for the period 1.12.2004 to 30.6.2007. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will make a representation to the 3rd respondent within two weeks from today, praying for arrears. If such representation is made, the 3 rd respondent shall consider it in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the receipt thereof and communicate result thereof to the petitioners. 3 2. Learned counsel for respondent no.1 states that there are some criminal and civil cases pending against the petitioners. He says that the 1st respondent has objection to the petitioners' absorption. We make it clear that this order is passed without prejudice to all the rights and contentions of the 1 st respondent. We make it further clear that we have not expressed any opinion as to whether the petitioners are entitled to the arrears or not. Petitioners' claim may be decided independently and in accordance with law. 3. Both the petitions are disposed of in the aforestated terms. (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.)