IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST APRIL 2009 / 11TH CHAITHRA 1931 RP.No. 1372 of 2008(A) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT WPC.9039/2006 Dated 03/07/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- SANTHA, D/O.LATE SANKARAN RAMAN, KURAVANPARAMBIL VALIYAKIZHAKKETHIL, KEEZHCHERIMEL MURI, CHENGANNUR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHENGANNUR. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA. BY GOVT. PELADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- R.P.No.1372 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of April, 2009 O R D E R Heard counsel for parties. The institution of this review petition on 16.12.2008 essentially discloses that apparently no action has followed to elevate the petitioner's complaints regarding the failure to provide alternate site. The judgment sought to be reviewed was issued on 3.7.2006 on the premise that what is stated in para 9 of the counter affidavit dated 23.6.2006 filed in the writ petition would be carried to its logical end. It appears that nothing has been done. The petitioner is seeking review of the judgment. This review petition is accordingly allowed. W.P(C).9039/06 will be taken up for consideration. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.3/4.