1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.132 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3050 OF 2007 Shivaji Murlidhar Jadhav & ors. .. Appellants V/s. Uttam Pandharinath Jadhav & ors .. Respondents Kishore Patil h/b. P.N.Joshi for the Appellants None for the Respondents CORAM : J.N.PATEL & A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATE : 28TH JUNE, 2007 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order in view of the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in the case of KISHANSING TOMAR Versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF AHMEDABAD AND OTHERS, reported in (2006) 8 Supreme Court Cases 352. 2 2. The Learned Single Judge upon hearing the parties has passed an order which almost concludes the issues and contentions raised in the petition, it could have been finally disposed of. Otherwise also we do not find any error or illegality in the impugned order. Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. (J.N.PATEL, J.) (A.A.SAYED, J.)