1wp-8967-09 Lrs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No.8967/2009 Mahasiddha Amasiddha Kubsange ..Petitioner. vs. State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents. Mr R.K.Mendadkar and C.K. Bhangoji for the petitioner. Mr S.R.Nargolkar, A.G.P., for Respondents. CORAM: D.K. DESHMUKH AND A.R.JOSHI,JJ DATED: 25TH JANUARY,2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the record. The impugned order shows that the Vigilance Cell s report i.e.,school record of the real grand- father of the petitioner shows that his caste was initially mentioned in the school record as Koli and, thereafter by a different ink some words were added. Same is the case with the school record of the brother of the grand father of the 2wp-8967-09 petitioner. These entries refer to the pre-independence period. This matter has been discussed by the Scrutiny Committee in detail in its order. The learned counsel submitted that the Scrutiny Committee should have called for original register. In our opinion, the submission is not well founded, because no ground was made to raise any doubt about the report of the Vigilance Cell. The Scrutiny Committee which is a body of Experts has recorded a finding of fact that the caste of the petitioner is not Mahadeo Koli, in our opinion, we will not be justified in interfering with the finding of fact. The petition is hereby rejected. (JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH.) (JUSTICE A.R.JOSHI.)