IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20667 of 2009 ANITA DEVI @ ANITA KUMARI Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 21.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that kidnapping, if any, is of a major girl, petitioner has no concern at any corner. In the case diary, it appears that the kidnapped girl told the informant about remaining in petitioner’s house which falsifies her wife. The victim was examined under Section 164 Cr. P.C. without naming this petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 44 of 2006, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)