IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 2619 of 2007 Between: 1 Kasi Ramu S/o.Appalaswamy R/o.D.No.7-86, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam District. 2 Kasi radha W/o.Ramu R/o.D.No.7-86, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam District. 3 Kasi Varaha Narasimha Murthy S/o.late Satyanarayana R/o.D.No.7-84, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam District. 4 Kasi China Satyanarayana S/o.Apparao R/o.D.No.7-85, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam District. 5 Somala Sattappa S/o.Kasi Pydiraju R/o.D.No.10-145, Simhachalam Uphills, Visakhapatnam District. 6 Thokala Abbaddam D/o.Kasi Padalu R/o.D.No.10-49, Simhachalam Uphills, Visakhapatnam District. 7 Kadala Satyavathi D/o.Kasi Padalu R/o.D.No.10-50, Simhachalam Uphills, Visakhapatnam District. 8 Narava Padalamma D/o.Narava Chinnayya Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam District. 9 Chippili Satyanarayana S/o.Apparao R/o.D.No.11-95, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Commissioner, Visakhapatnam. 2 Visakhapatnam Urban development Authority, rep. by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ and direct the respondents to act in accordance with law and forbear from interfering the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the lands in Sy.Nos. 42/1, 42/2, 56/6, 56/5, 56/2, 56 Part, 56/3 Part, 28 Part and 56/4 of Darapalem Vilage, Hamlet of Mudasarlova village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam district, pending the appeal of the petitioners before the Commissioner (Appeals), Hyderabad in CCLA Ref.No.P1/412/2006 and without giving an opportunity to the petitioners to contest the invalidating factor about their continuance in possession of the above said lands and grant such other relief as it deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.VENKATARAMANA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1& 2: MR.N.RANGA REDDY (SC FOR MPL. CORP. VSP) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 2619 of 2007 ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. _________ 24-06-2008 rkk ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Commissioner, Visakhapatnam. 2 Visakhapatnam Urban development Authority, rep. by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Visakhapatnam. 3.2CD copies