IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9081 of 2010 Date of Decision: March 21, 2011 Pritam Dass .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Financial Commissioner, Cooperation, Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. G.S. Nagra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. R.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.4. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This civil writ petition challenges order dated 22.4.2008 (Annexure P-4), Order dated 16.10.2008 (Annexure P-7) and Order dated 8.4.2010 (Annexure P-9). 2. Vide Order dated 22.4.2008 (Annexure P-4), the petitioner who was appointed as Lambardar, has been dismissed in the interest CWP No.9081 of 2010 [2] of public on the ground that the petitioner made misleading statement about his income so as to get old age pension. The petitioner was in unauthorised possession. Ejectment orders from the land have been passed. The said order has been upheld by the Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar and Financial Commissioner vide Orders Annexure P-7 and P-9. 3. The authorities have taken into account the fact that petitioner has encroached upon the Panchayat land. The grounds on which petitioner has been dismissed from the post of Lambardar, are relevant in context of Rule 16 of the Punjab Land Revenue Rules, and therefore, no case for judicial review of impugned orders is made out in extraordinary writ jurisdiction. 4. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) March 21, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?