IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42396 of 2010 MITHILESH YADAV, SON OF MUNESHWAR YADAV. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 15.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is not named in the First Information Report but it appears from perusal of impugned order that he was put on T.I. Parade and he was identified by the informant. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner, is that other co-accused have already been granted bail by this court, but from perusal of the record, it appears that the case of this petitioner is not identical to the co-accused persons who have been released on bail because the above stated co-accused persons had not been put on T.I. Parade, rather some looted articles said to have been recovered from their conscious possession. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Dhanarua P.S. Case No. 219 of 2010 stands rejected. The petitioner is languishing in 2 jail custody since 5.7.2010 so if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within nine months from the date of receipt of this order, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. Devendra/ ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)