IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.699 of 2010 VIKAS KUMAR, S/o Ajay Singh, R/o Vill. Rajapur, P.S. Bodhgaya, Dist. Gaya thr. his father ad litem. Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 12.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The revision application is filed against the Judgment and order dated 16.03.2010 passed in Cr. Appeal No. (Juvenile) 5/10 by the Addl. District and Sessions Judge, IInd Gaya and the order dated 16.02.2010 passed by the Juvenile District Board, Gaya in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No. 84 of 2009. In a case of theft after breaking the house, Section 411 of the I.P.C. is added on recovery of some of the stolen articles but not from the possession of the petitioner rather his name appeared in confession made by a co-accused. Taking that into consideration, Pankaj Kumar another co-accused has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 43768 of 2009. In my view having some privilege, under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (care and protection of children) Act, petitioner is entitled for the same relief, while he is in custody since December, 2009 2 which has not been cared by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as by the Appellate Court. Accordingly, the revision application is allowed and the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya. One of the bailers shall be the father of the petitioner, who would undertake to keep the petitioner under his observation and produce whenever is required by the Juvenile Justice Board or Court. Both the orders dated 16.03.2010 passed by the Addl. Dist. & Sessions. Judge, IInd Gaya and the order dated 16.02.2010 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya are hereby set aside. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)