1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 1938/2009 Rustam Shankar Jakate ..vs.. Tukaram Pandurang Dhagekar & anr. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Chopde, Advocate for applicant. Mr. Vyas, Advocate for non applicant no.1 Mr. Yengal, A.P.P. for non applicant no.2. CORAM:- R. Y. GANOO, J. DATED:- 26 th AUGUST, 2009 As the matter was called out, learned Advocate for the applicant prays that he is not pressing for relief in terms of prayer clause (1). In view of this, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution so far as prayer clause (1) is concerned. So far as prayer clause (2), the applicant wants to challenge order of issuance of process by filing appropriate proceedings in the District Court. He seeks liberty to withdraw this application. Hence, the application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. No views are expressed on the merits of matter. Interim stay of trial Court’s proceedings stands vacated. JUDGE kahale