IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 608 OF 2007 M/S NAROO INFRASTRUCTURE AND HOUSING PROJECTS REPR. BY ITS PARTNER SHRI IQBAL NAROO AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH THE SECRETARY REVENUE AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. J. E. Coelho Pereira, Senior Advocate with Mr. V. Korgaonkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. R. Chodankar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- D. B. BHOSALE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 7th January, 2008 P.C. Heard Mr. Pereira, learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Advocate General for the respondents. Mr. Pereira submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if they are given a liberty to approach the Collector, North Goa, Panaji seeking refund of an amount of Rs.3,03,400/- collected by the respondents as conversion fees, along with interest from the date of receipt of the said amount till the date of refund. The learned Advocate General has no objection for granting such liberty. 2. In the circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of as not pressed, with liberty as prayed. If the application as aforestated, is made within a period of 2 weeks from today, the same shall be considered in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks thereafter. All contentions in the writ petition are kept open. Writ petition is disposed of. D. B. BHOSALE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. ssm.