1 PGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Review Petition No.13 of 2010 IN Writ Petition No.20 of 2010 Ankush B. Hotkar .. .. Petitioner v/s. The State of Mah. & ors. .. .. Respondents Ms.Kranti Kamble for Petitioner. Mr.S.D. Rarikar, AGP for Respdts. ----- CORAM : SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 13th April, 2010 P.C. : 1.My order dated 4.1.2010 is sought to be reviewed. The Petitioner is a retired Railway Policeman. He retired under a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS). He did not hand over possession of the Government accommodation back to the Respondents/Government in whose service he was. He instead filed the above Writ Petition No.20 of 2010 to seek a stay against the Government requiring him to hand over the residential accommodation. He mentioned about another petition filed by one Kharat in the Supreme Court. The said Kharat filed a petition in the High Court in which the Division Bench of this Court granted interim relief. The Petitioner claims 2 similar relief. 2.The order passed by the Division Bench in the case of Kharat in Writ Petition No.3341 of 2005 shows that the interim relief came to be granted because the Petitioner in that case had entered into a lease agreement with the Respondents/Government and the issue was pending before the Supreme Court as to whether the premises of the Government was taken on lease or on requisition. In this case, the Petitioner has not shown any lease agreement entered into by him with the Respondents. He was a Railway Policeman simpliciter. He retired and must hand over the accommodation to the Government. Hence no stay against the Government requiring him to hand over the Government accommodation can be granted. 3.The Review Petition is dismissed. (SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.)