W.P. No. 1494 (S/S) of 2007 Hon’ble. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 05.09.2007, whereby the petitioner’s transfer from Kandiya (District Pauri) to Kankhal (District Haridwar), is cancelled. From the impugned order itself it is evident that the same was passed in pursuance of G.O. No. 357/XXIV-2/2007, dated 13.08.2007. Said G.O. provides that all those transfer orders, which are passed on 29.12.2006 and thereafter form a ‘Durgam’ place to ‘Sugam’ place or from ‘Sugam’ to ‘Sugam’ are to be cancelled. Initially G.O. dated 09.05.2007 was passed by Government in this regard, which was clarified by another G.O. dated 12.05.2007. In said clarification, it is provided that new appointments and promotions are not to be cancelled. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner’s appointment at Kandiya, District Pauri, was a new appointment. This Court is of the view that by the impugned order the Government has not cancelled posting of the petitioner at Kandiya. What has been cancelled is her transfer from Kandiya to Kankhal, which is covered by aforesaid G.O. The spirit of the aforesaid G.O. is to giver priority in filling the existing vacancies of the colleges of the interior areas. This Court cannot interfere with such a policy decisions. The transfer order neither suffers from any malice nor any arbitrariness nor is it against the Rules. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is liable to be dismissed. The same is dismissed. However, as far as petitioner’s personal problems are concerned, she may make a representation to the authority concerned, who shall consider and dispose of the same. Dt.10.10.2007 (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) S