IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CWP No. 18100 of 2011 Date of decision: 26.09.2011 Raj Kumar Bansal ....... Petitioner Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Jatinder S Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Contends that the petitioner retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.09.2007. However, although the pension was released to the petitioner on 08.05.2008, the same was on the basis of earlier pay scale and not as per the revised pay scale. The petitioner made various representations and finally a legal notice was sent on 10.01.2011. The same is still pending as no decision has been taken thereon. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to the appropriate authority to decide the legal notice dated 10.01.2011 of the petitioner within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 26.09.2011 mohan