v INTHE MIGH COURTOFGMI-lA'mSGARHATBILASPURrC.G.1 W.P. N0. ^75f /2004 ;....-'(%N-.-.i.'':'.',';:1 PETmONER^ ^^<y\g^ Ghanshyam "m3?y' a^g :^'^%y'.;; ::; Sahu- S/o Puniram 54 years, R/o. Village AFnlidih, RS. Jaijaipur, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Ghampa [C.<3.] ^ RESPQ^IDENTS VERSU& (...'. ' ' :• . ' 1. Stat& of ChhattisgarM ThroUQh :- CQllector Distt. Janjgir-Champa [C.G.J - 2. .The TaMsildar, . .;,,,[ Tahsil- Sakti; Distt^ahjgir-Gharnpa & PETtTIONU/A 226/2276 OFTHE CONSTITUTIONOFINDIA ;8--9' •SSf'-qi^iy^ ^.s^^^si. 201.2005 f<A" I* Shri RQvish Verma, counsel 5hri ScuTJay S. Agrawal; 'respondents. •,:: :;:/ ,_' ': ', ^ ' Heard botH the cpunsel. By tftis writ ^tition,;^ respandent No.2 is not issuihg tbe| diildren. The cttse of the petitioner i^ applied for aomiciie Gertificorte af-] wid requisit®doeuments were aiso But, respondent No-2 is not jsa^ni ground that the petrt'ioner's childp^ Jamwu & Kashmir, ^ thersfprs, cer'tificate. Whereas, •fti®peTition^r- revsnue record (Annexure- P-2) andj of the vitloge (Annexyre P-1), the r'esidents of Villaqe; Amiidih; TeH Chanipa, and the pe+itioner' \s owne| continuous possession on it; in his Respbndent No^ did not conside^ ^etttiOTier hiM rwii^d ^ievai^^that domicile certificate ih fcivour of his /lffni<a<4 4'n' ifiiaiitt +l^><a ff/tina. TJi'K Aitifci4l'ilii*]<iift1^zt'<fatai< ^siRpTsiter. ^ ;i ^•the petitioner... '; :•: ., . : .. ©ovt.; Advocatei for the State/ !S<i4ng 1^at ths diildren of ths petitionsn |er cornpletion of a!S 4he for'maiities submitteel beforft respondent Nci,2. the aQmicile certificate on the }n were edycated from 1+ie State of t)iey are nof eligible for doBiicile n^r's, further case is that^ a& pep ttie ;r^ort^oflhePtitwcOTanct 5^ ^ettt'one!'flnd his fsmity ar«Originally (sii: Mdtkharoudsi., E)istrict: Sanjgir- t* »fthe agricul+ural field and hdving |own title. olong Witfi children's.name. ^ to issue domici!& <»Ftific^iB dnd •i+iioner* nnd hL<3 ft»t<~a'<a+or»< !iuarJ flinc® Gi.fRJ—FS/350—12/2000—50,000. 7 r "i|[<ai(?)y,,«^'iKo^f6t<'ij.y^ !<-tl* jhNi* ^Rl^fq^'^ijc(f^««;q^ wnwofta affl^t "2- rs years togetiiep at Vilit^e; there ond hod no cnother are tha domicite of the Sta-l backwurd ciass of ^society. C'4 reservatioh quota cilso.; The itie domieile bf any other 3 directed to issue domicile certifl Learned coynsel for the in wr'i'ttng is beihg pdsseci by to give ttie domiciie certificcrte. Havjng h®ardlearned •rhe facts and cifcumstances fjlie necessary dscuments on4 ^ertificcrte before'respondent todey, and in tui'n,^respondent [ the petitioner's cfiildren shal within ahother 30 davs and With The direction afore^ Consequen+ly, I.A.No./'Z^' Parties are antitted for Anjlidih wid havin9 consKiersble occupation or residenca ih Ihdia;:'thereforle, tbey |e of Chhqtt-iS9arh and ttiBy beton9 +o iklren of -rtie petitioner are entitied for p^titioner nndL his chiidren never acquired Qftixte. Therefore, •the :resp<»ndents be lcate. : '• • ' ; :. ; , •' betitionef submitted •riicrt no formal order r^ponds"'*' -2 and opatlYihe has refused sup^ly .<»i.i?c)<i!i^nrffffft^ y"i$<;i<, ^R'^Eff^n^t •^.:-^. eotlnsel olf for'riie pnrties anci having regard to tiie cdse, the petitioner is directed to opplication fw oblainjng 1+ie dtfmicife No.2 ;v»ithin n, period of 30'; sloys •frow ^Sio.Z after eonsidermg the appliedtibh of pass ttie orclef iri accordnnce with faw, copy of the order to tfie Qppticants. ^aid, •rhs petition stands dispQsed of. r^9/2004 also standsclisposed of. c^rtified copy of tHis ordet\___ I;'"' -.^oma • ••-^-•••-•--•••••- •.--. G^PRJ-^S/350—12/2000—50.000. Sd/- LC.Bhadoo ' Judge 1;<1., .r