IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8814 of 2009 1.SUMITRA DEVI wife of Sudarshan Pandey 2.Puja @ Rashmi wife of late Chunchun Tiwari, both resident of village-Sheohar, P.S.-Sheohar, Dist.-Sheohar. Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.9832 of 2009 SUDARSHAN PANDEY son of late Krishnadeo Pandey, Resident of village-Sheohar, P.S.-Sheohar, Dist.-Sheohar. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 24.8.2009 Both the above applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order because they have arisen out of one occurrence under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner Puja alias Rashmi is wife of the deceased Chunchun Tiwary whereas other petitioners are parents of petitioner Puja alias Rashmi. The deceased is son of the informant. Submission is that nobody has seen the occurrence. The only evidence gathered against the petitioners is that they have been insisting in cremation of the dead body in hurry. The petitioner had no motive at all to kill. Petitioner Puja alias Rashmi is the only ultimate loser of the deceased. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub.Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar at Sitamarhi in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No.42 of 2008. Md.S. (Shyam Kishore Sharma,J.)