THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3852 OF 2007 DT.01.07.2010 Between: P.Dinakaran and two others ………….Petitioners Vs. Chitturi Bala Siva Subrahmanyam and another. ………………Respondents. O R D E R: The petitioners who are the landlords filed the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the correctness of the docket order passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Chintalapudi in A.T.C.No.3 of 2001, dated 27.07.2007. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in spite of several objections raised by the petitioners with regard to the admissibility of Ex.A-16 lease deed, the court below without considering the said objections, admitted the document into evidence. After considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners and on perusing the material placed before this court, it is seen that the court below marked Ex.A-16 subject to the objections. It is also seen that though the court below did not reject the objections filed by the petitioners, but failed to give any finding on the objections. Therefore, the petitioner can canvass the objections again, at the time of disposal of the main case itself. The revision petition is dismissed. No costs. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO J., Dt.01.07.2010 tjs