1 Cri.Appln.No.330 of 2011 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 330 OF 2011 Vikram Ratankumar Singh ... Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. ... Respondents None for the applicant. Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATED : AUGUST 22, 2011 P.C. The learned counsel for the applicant absent when called. Perused the record. The complainant made an application in the proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act in terms of section 91 thereof to produce certain documents from Sinhgad Technical Education. The learned Judge on analysis of the record found that the accused in the proceedings had filed written statement at Exh. 91 on 4.1.2011. Thereafter the complainant (applicant) moved application under section 311 of Cr.P.C. at Exh. 93 dated 17.1.2011. It was allowed. On 23.2.2011, 2 Cri.Appln.No.330 of 2011 the complainant examined bank witnesses. However, thereafter did not proceed to argue the matter on the adjourned dates. Thereafter the impugned application was made. The conduct of the complainant/applicant speaks for itself. He, as a complainant should have been vigilant to prosecute the matter. However, laxity on his part illustrate his keenness in protracting the matter. The application lacks merit. Dismissed. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)