IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17418 of 2009 1. ABDUL MAZID 2. MD. LUTFULLA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 01.09.2009 Heard both sides. Contention of the petitioners is that the police upon conclusion of the investigation did not submit charge-sheet against them. In the F.I.R., there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. It is next contended that there is counter version of the case also. Learned Sessions Judge, while rejecting the application, considered all the submissions and made elaborate observations in the last paragraph . Learned counsel submits that similarly placed co- accused namely Md. Anwarul has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this court. The order is Annexure-2. He refers to and rely upon statements made in paragraph 4 of the order. Looking to the order and facts appearing from the record, this court is persuaded to extend the same privilege to the petitioners. In the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, let petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri J.K. Dubey, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class,, Rosera, District- Samastipur in connection with Singhiya P.S. 2 case no. 62 of 2005 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )