-78 3fft?T^f?:fW ^2? 3TT^?[ »)*<icti ^=r '<iwwii, aiil'M'ifi, ftdi'yy,< *ll*l^T thllch SfI^T'q^T ('^3^r) ?^ITWHft^ 311^1 cni<1^41'rl 'WT^ff ^f dfeT3t if^l^K ^affin ail^l ITI R.P. years, Chhal Town, Chhat Versi laik, S/o Shri K.R. Naik, aged about 39 Presentiy posted as Junior Engineer, :lsgarh State Electricity Board, Shakti Shakti, District Janjgir-Champa, isaarh RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. 4 Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board through the Secretary, Daganiya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Chief| Engineer (RR),Chhattisgarh State Elecirjcity Bpard, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Superfntending Engineer (O & M), Chhattisgarh State plectricity Board, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ExecL|tive Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Elecir|city Board, Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh HON'BLE SHRJ DHiRENbRA MISHRA. J Shri Sanjay Ku. Agrawal| Shri Yashwant Slngh T^ the respondsnts. Heard. Briefiy stated grievance| posted as Jun'or Engineer alj dated 15-3-2007 of Annexur^. increment without cumulative 4 resoondsnts for misconduct. counse! for the petitioner. !1a'<ur, Advocate, takes notlce on behaif of of the petit'oner is thst the petitioner was Saraipali in the year 2007. Vide order :-P/4 penaity of stoppage of one a""ua! 'ffect was imposed on the petitioner by the 'he petitioneF preferred an appea! against ^w ,^ I-HC—78 3n^!i -^i r<;.)ici, CiTT STT^T sFTlf^ •or 3ar\/e ~3~^ ^WWil, W^WKa, hv\Wy *ii*ior %*n^» "^.200 3II^?I 'VRK ('yfj'l^) ?WIW flfTO Sfl^f -c?- the above order of imposition| respondsnt No.2 vide Annexu' addressed reminders dated 2 depertmental appeai preferred Engineer has not decided his aj Learned counsel for th| petition may be disposed of wit| the appeat of Annexure-P./T vi,'Jt| Legrned counse! for the| preferred by the' petitioner sh period of 6 weeks from today. In view of the submissf parties, nothing sun/ives for ac| accordingiy disposed of. •^ ^•ii^fCTiQ'f iTR^y ^f feTst <r;if^i< ^siRraan^i of penaity before the CFdef Engineer, (•e-P/7 on 13-6-2007. He subsequently 11-8-2007 and 14-12-2007 for deciding ^y him. However, respondent No.2 Chief )peal ti!i date. i^ petitioner submitted that the instant a direction to respondent No.2 to decide 'in a specified period. respondents submitted that the appeal W be considered and decided withln [ions made by learned counse! for the liudscation of the petition. The petjtlon is A- ^'SdA::,. :.1 DhirendraMishra Judge •|!l— Bf" • K ^w