IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-295 of 2010 Date of Decision: January 11, 2010 Jatinder Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & Another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No.656 dated 22.10.2009 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 367, 506 IPC, registered with Police Station, City Kaithal on the basis of compromise, Annexure P-2. Although learned counsel for the petitioner, during arguments has not mentioned the facts, however, the office has reported that the petitioner earlier approached this Court by way of filing Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-32393 of 2009. Having gone through the file of Crl. Misc. No. M-295 of 2010 [2] Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-32393 of 2009, I find that the following order was passed on 18.11.2009:- “Learned counsel has addressed arguments at length. However, he has not been able to convince the court that the FIR in question (under Sections 367, 506 IPC) can be quashed on the basis of compromise, particularly in view of the nature of allegations levelled in the same. He has, thus, prayed that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition at this stage. Dismissed as withdrawn.” In view of the fact that the petitioner has earlier approached this Court and withdrew the petition only after addressing arguments at length when he could not make out a case for quashing on the basis of compromise in view of the nature of allegations, I find no ground to interfere in the present petition for similar relief. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) January 11, 2010 JUDGE avin