^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR -c=c!5eS&?^ ^^ci CONTEMPTP®¥tW©]9 ~~~ 3C^> /2011 PETITIONE ^± 2?I Ramesh Kumar Chandra S/o Late Shri Shivdayal Chandra, Aged about 42 years, Cultivator and Ex-Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Bhatora, Tahsil-Malkharauda/ District Janjgir champa-(C.G.) VERSUS ^^GNTEMNOR/ O^RESPONDENT 1. Shri Brijesh Chandra Mishra, Collector, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) • 2. Shri G.S. Nayak, Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Malkharauda, Dist. Janjgir Champa (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W. SECTION 12 OF CONTEMPT OFCOURTACT 1979. •yo^ -^zrTq-^i^, ^f^PTC', 'f^TRTg^ ,.Gt?e(C;^^OS7^rl ^Ts^i't^ri^' ^m^it^^^N? \ 371^1 -q^? (^3^?) ^^W^N'3^ ^prf^T^'RTTOf ^ ^T^ ^ ^^ SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Slhrivastava. J. 05-09-2011 Shri Sunil Otwani, counsel for th^ Heard. Learned counsel for the petition^ petitioner. tr submits that vide order dated 21- 01-2008, the petition filed by the petitiqner was disposed off with liberty to make representation to the Collector,J^njgir-Champa, and it was directed that the matter be decided after duejenquiry. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though pursujant to the order passed by the Collector, the respondent No.2 has i Sarpanch on 09-01-2009, 12-01-2009, recovery. It is also submitted that on 04-06-2011, the Deputy Director also instructed the respondent No.2 to take notice was issued on 07-07-201 1 to th^ of Rs.3,23,478/-. It is further submittedl deposited so far, yet no coercive stepsj willful disobedience of the order passedj Vide order dated 21-01-2008, liberty to make representation to the Cc| order dated 03-01-2006 by the Clfief Executive Officer. From the on record, it appears that, even [order, no steps were being taken. documents, which have been placed though, the Collector had passed an From the demand notice dated 09-01-21009, 12-01-2009and 07-07-2011, it is found that the Chief Executive Offi issuing notice. •sued demand letters to the then ut no coercive steps were taken for ^teps for recovery, and thereafter, a then Sarpanch for raising demand Ithat the said amount has not been 'are being taken, which amounts to bythisCourt. vrit petition was disposed off with llector regarding non-compliance of ^er has already raised demand by 51. ^Tra—FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000. •.^^:y,\--f, /^r^ "% / m.^^ " ^-Sf •^FI^Tir, ^"^m, f5?^TRTH^' ^ u 3^1 T^- C^^f) 3T!^^1-M^ ^rr^it^'^^w Tumane '^IT^R ._ ^ Considering that the respondenl am not inclined to initiate any cont| observed that in case, amount due und| concerned authority should take app|opriate steps towards recovery in accordance with the provisions of law. With the aforesaid direction, the '^N^fl^ "RT^f ^ ''"^ ^T^R ^ 3tiW Z'^T No.2 has issued demand notice, I ^mpt proceedings. However, it is pr notice of payment, is not paid, the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^\wf\^ ^-S\^ ^uii^, <i^-ii^iN—FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000. lil