IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.21093 of 1995 Between: Hanuman khandasari Sugar Mills, rep. by its Partner Rameswarlal Agarwal, Nandigam, Ramayanpet Mandal, Medak Dist. ..... Petitioner And The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Hyderabad. .....Respondent Petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or a writ particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring that the petitioner is entitled to sell and transport the Molasses from the factor of the petitioner without any restrictions from the respondent on sale or transport. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KOKA RAGHAVA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner represents that the cause in this writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become ‘infructuous’. No costs. ________________ (N.V. RAMANA, J) Date: 07.10.2004 Nsr. To 1. The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Hyderabad. 1. Two CCs to G.P. for Prohibition and Excise, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 2. Two CD copies.