IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29824 of 2011 Arunakar Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 27.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Mithanpura P.S. Case No. 155/2011, for the offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, is solitary named accused in this case with allegation of taking Rs. 2 lacs in advance for transfer of a piece of land but failed to do so and in order to return money so taken issued a cheque of Rs. 25,000/- which was bounced. Submission is that in fact informant was an employee of the petitioner and due to some dispute accrued during such employment the aforesaid case has been instituted. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Mithanpura P.S. Case No. 155/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)