IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17605 of 2009 1. MAHESHWAR SINGH S/O LATE GAGANDEO SINGH, R/O VILL- MASHAHI, P.S- MAJORGANJ, DITT- SITAMARHI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PUBLIC HELATH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, MECHANICAL, PUBLIC HELATH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, MECHANICAL, PUBLIC HELATH ENGINEERING CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER . PUBLIC HELTH ENGINEERING DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR ----------- 2. 25.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission is that the appointment of the petitioner on daily wage and then induction into the work charge establishment and then subsequent reversion to the status of daily wage deeming him to be fresh appointee amenable to the new pension scheme etc. are all matters considered by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 6183 of 2008 affirmed in L.P.A. No. 903 of 2009. Counsel for the State rightly submits that it shall remain a matter for factual verification if in fact the petitioner was similarly situated. This court expects that if the respondents find that he was similarly situated, similar treatment shall be meted out to him. If the respondents opined that the 2 petitioner was not similarly situated entitled to similar treatment, they shall be required to pass a reasoned and speaking order setting out the points for difference of opinion from the earlier orders of this Court distinguishing the claims of the petitioner, so that judicial review, if necessary, may be facilitated. Let such consideration be done and appropriate final orders passed within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)