M-HC—78 311^1 Wf^fW wir aii^i »*<iti T '75T •<4i<iici<i, ®T|).M'I<»,f°<diyy *11*1CTI awra» .IS£.. •WI,200 3^ffT^^ (^3^f) t^iw^tetaii^t r- (}.NO,156_OF200i s< afc Ar yersys 1. Si 2. Si^te Goyt. of Chhattisgarh, Through Ths S^cretar/, Finance Department, DKS Bhawan |ipur, District Raipur (CG) 1/isional Joint Director, jreasury, Account and Pension) Raipur, Distf. R^ipur (CG) Di (T Shri Somkant Shri UNS Deo, na,learfl Qf\ The appiicant has fiied thi^ present in the order dated 31 wherein address ofthe appiicant| wrongly mentioned in the cause t] Learned cou'nsel for the i titte of the petition, !t would be] "Santosh Sahu, S/o Shri Ghasiii Jagat, Post-Amucoal-Vla-Basna\ order dated 31st Januar/, 2009, J Shri Ghasiram Sahu, aed abQiit\ 3orshi, Vistar Housing Board\ tiiili-iili >imvS if fe^t <i"it<i< ^ ^tRpT 37lt?T J intosh Sahu, S/o Shri Ghasiram Sahy, agei lout 66 years, R/o Viliage Jagat, Posl |iucoai-Via-Basna, Distt. Ma'nasamund (CG) led counsei for the applicant. ..for the State. ^ petition for correcting the typographica! error (January, 2009 passed in WP(s) No.6879/08, ^nd description of the respondents have been lt!e. ipplicant submits ihat from perusal of cause evident that description of the appllcant is ^m Sahu, aged aboiit 66 years, R/o ViSage- Distt.-Mahasamund (CG)", whereas in the ff. has been mentioned as "Santosh Sahu, S/o \66 years, Rtd U.D.T., R/o HSG-1/484, New Colony, Borshi', Duiy, Distt Durg (CG)". JU- XI-HC—78 aii^iw k-n^ WT 3TI^| »i*ii<t) s. '3^ T<II';IICT<<, ®xil'<-i'is,fa|cliy^< timwr a»*ii<sii "^200 3iI^I'q^T(iyfj^q) TOIIW ^lfSCT 311^1 Similariy, the description of res| as "State Go\4. of Chhattisi Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Chhatfisgarh, Through : The Se Raipur, District Raipur (CG)" ani inadvertentiy typed as "Divlsic Raipur {CG)", 'm place of "0/w, Pension) Raipur, Distt. Raipur ((. Shri UNS Deo, iearned apparent error in the descrjptiori 2009 and he has no objection if i Heard learned counsei fo January, 2009 passed by this is apparent error ii weli as the respondents in thei 2009, which needs modification directed that in the order datel parties be read as under: Sant^ afcoul :nfs 1. Statdi <^f<l[<'l4f1 'RTO^Jf -^f •fe^- <F;q^|.(. ^3TfOT3Tlt?( sftondent No.1 has aiso been incorrectly typed jarh, Through : the Secretary, Educati'on [Rafpt/r (CG)", in place of "State Govt. of ^refary, Finance Departmenf, D.K.S. Bhawan, ji the description of respondent No.2 has been ^ia! Joint Dlrector, (Treasury and Pension), ^ional Joint Director, (Treastiry, Account and }Gj". lcounse! for the State subrnits that there is of the parties in the order dated 31 January, Ihe same is corrected. ^ the parties and perused the order dated 31SI IGourt as weli as the cause tifte ofths vv'rit 1 the description of the applicanfpetitioner as cause titie of the order dated 31 Januaiy, . Accordingiy, the petition is aitowed and it is i 31 January, 2009, the description of the |>sh Sahu, S/o Shri Ghasiram Sahu, aged 66 years, Wo ViSlage-Jagat, Post'- \oal-Via-Basna,Distt.- Mahasamund (CG) Vs. Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through : T'ne Secr^tary, Finance Depariment, D.K.S. Bhav^an, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) ___- XI-HC—78 SII^I W R-) -cTaff sarr^T 9^i<h <" <y Kl ^=T r<ii'4lMAi, ®-nl'M''is,fqoi'yy ^mvff a«*iit»» "W^ 200 sn^r'iraqr (icif3°<<icf) l^iiW^fetsni^F A copy of thls order be p!| supplied with the copy of order d^ ^i)li<rt<fli ^i+iCTf ^f fst<i1 <Pnt$i< ^sifiwaii^i 2. Divisi^nal Joint Director, (Treasury, Account andF^nsion) Rajpur, Distt. Raipur(CG)" sced in the i-ecord of WP(s)No. 6879;'08. and st ;ted31slJanuary,2009. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge «a IBS! SHII'II ss^">s