IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 4238 of 2008 Between: Burla Balraj S/o Veeraiah R/o Kummera Village, Chevella Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Hyderabad. 3 The mandal Revenue officer, Chevella Mandal Ranga Reddy district. 4 J\Kamtam Ram Pramod Rao S/o K. Krishna rao R/o H. No. 18-7-526/82, SRT Quarters, Uppuguda, Hyderabad. 5 Devar Venkat Reddy S/o Ranga Reddy R/o Chandra Reddy Nagar Colony, Lane Opposite to New Registration Office, Chevella Ranga eddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus" declaring action of the 1st respondent in not taking up the revision case and also the action of 3rd respondent in proceedings with case without waiting for orders in the Revision case filed against the order dated 19-12-2007 passed by 2nd respondent in Appeal Proceedings appeal No. C/4564 of 2007, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent to take up the suspension petition inthe revision case andfurther direct the 3rd respondent not to proced with remanded acase till the approriate Orders are passed on Revision Case filed by petitioner and pass any other order or orders for ends of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.LAXMAN Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents 4 and 5: None appeared. The Court made the following : O R D E R: The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not taking up the revision case and also the action of the 3rd respondent in proceeding with case without waiting for orders in the Revision Case filed against the order dated 19-12-2007 passed by the 2nd respondent in Appeal Proceedings No. C/4564 of 2007, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct the 1st respondent to take up the suspension petition in the revision case and further direct the 3rd respondent not to proceed with remanded case till the appropriate orders are passed on Revision Case filed by petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that as against the orders dated 19.12.2007 passed by the 2nd respondent-R.D.O., Chevella in File No.C/4565/2007, the petitioner filed revision before the Joint Collector on 23.02.2008 along with the stay application. It is further stated that the second respondent by the aforesaid order dated 19.12.2007 while setting aside the orders dated 05.08.2004 passed by the Tahsildar in mutating the lands of an extent of Ac.1.14 guntas situated at Kummera village of Chevella mandal, Ranga Reddy District in Sy.No.234/2, remanded the matter for fresh enquiry and to pass appropriate orders. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner has filed the revision along with the stay application, which is pending. Having regard to the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and dispose of the stay application filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:28.02.2008 Note: Furnish C.C. tomorrow. B/O Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRT}