PSR, J. Crl.P.No. 8564 of 2009 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri V. Narayana Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. While granting interim stay of arrest of the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor was directed to verify as to whether the statement of the victim girl was recorded. Now, the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent-victim girl submits that the police have recorded the statement of the victim, wherein she has narrated about the offence. 3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no details about the alleged offence have been narrated in the statement and a false case has been foisted against the petitioner to defame him. It is not possible to give any finding with regard to the correctness or otherwise of the allegations whether the petitioner was falsely implicated. At this stage, there is definitely prima facie case against the petitioner. As such considering the gravity of the offence, it is not a fit case to grant any relief to the petitioner. 4. In the result, the petition is dismissed. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. Dated:03-11-2009 *BVS