RSA No.1828 of 2011 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.1828 of 2011 (O&M). Decided on: April 27, 2011. Narain Singh and others. .. Appellants VERSUS Lal Singh etc. .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporter? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? * * * PRESENT Mr.S.S.Godara, Advocate, for the appellants. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Suit of the plaintiff-respondent for permanent injunction regarding the house has been decreed by the Courts below. The defendants-appellants had raised a plea to demolish the case of the plaintiff-respondent regarding his ownership in the house in dispute by pleading that the plaintiff-respondent had sold his share . . . 1 RSA No.1828 of 2011 (O&M) in the house for consideration about 5/6 years prior to the filing of the suit in Panchayat and had removed the doors and bricks etc. The said plea has been found to be false. The plaintiff-respondent has not been able to establish his better possessory title than the defendants-appellants in the house in dispute. Counsel for the appellants has vehemently contended that the defendants have been able to establish that the plaintiff-respondent had left the village Mohammadpur Sottar and had settled in village Farwain Kalan, Tehsil and District Sirsa, by leaving the possession of the property in dispute. A concurrent finding of fact has been arrived at by both the Courts below regarding the share of the plaintiff-respondent in the house in dispute to the extent of 1/3rd share in portion consisting of two rooms, a kitchen and boundary wall. The dispute is amongst the real brothers. No substantial question of law is involved in the case. Counsel for the appellant has also argued that at the most, the plaintiff-respondent can seek partition of the property, he having not been able to establish his exclusive possession in any portion of the house in dispute. I do not find any force in this contention, in view of the finding of fact arrived at by the Courts below. Dismissed. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE April 27, 2011. rka . . . 2