ast 1 wp2155.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2155 OF 2010 Pralhad Bhausaheb Deosthan, Barshi ....Petitioner Vs. Barshi Municipal Council & ors. ....Respondents Mr. Surel S. Shah, advocate for petitioner. Mr.Nitin Jamdar, advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for Respondent No.2. CORAM:­ A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.M.SAVANT, JJ DATED:­ APRIL 29, 2010 P.C. 1. Counsel for the Respondent Council on instruction states that as of now Council has no intention to hold auction in respect of site No.94. In view of this statement, Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this Petition and instead approach the Respondent Council by way of representation to impress upon the Council about the issues that have been raised in this Petition, which can be considered by the Council on its own merits and appropriate decision taken before proceeding to issue public notice for holding auction in respect of site no.94. ast 2 wp2155.10.sxw 2. Counsel for the Respondent Council submits that Council is not averse to considering representation to be made by the Petitioner. 3. In view of the above, nothing survives for consideration in this Petition. The same is allowed to be withdrawn. Petition disposed of accordingly. (R.M. SAVANT, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)