é \ &(* x 0% SINGLE BENCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.11 9 3L of 2011 PETITIONER/: J/agdenTS/o Khorbahra Gond, (Respondent No.1 in the Aged about 40 years, Election Petition) Occupation: Agriculture, R/o Village Lenjakhar, Gram Panchayat Lenjakhar, w Tahsii Bodia, District Kabirdham C.G.) - Versus - RESPONDENTS: 1. r Sub Divisional Officer, Bodla, District Kabirdham (C.G.) (Petitioner in the 2./ Parsuram, S/o Bhawra, Election Petition) Aged about 37 years, Occupation: Agriculture, R/o Village Lenjakhar, Gram Panchayat Lenjakhar, Janpad Panchayat Bodla, Tahsil Bodla, District Kabirdham C.G.) (Respondents No.2 to 6 in 3/ Ishuram, S/o Rameram Gohd, the Election Petition) Aged about 35 years, Occupation: Agriculture, R/o Village Lakhanpur, Gram Panchayat Lenjakhar, Tahsil Bodla, District Kabirdham C.G.) Panchuram: S/o Johra Gond, Aged about 40 years, Occupation: Agriculture, R/o Village Lenjakhar, Gram Panchayat Lenjakhar, Tahsil Bodla, District Kabirdham C.G.) 5. Onkar Prasad Gupta, S/o not known to the petitioner, Aged about 40 years, Occupation: Teacher, Presiding Officer, Ward No.1 to 5, MOM Gram Panchayat Lenjakhar, Tahsil Bodla, District Kabirdham C.G.) 6. GR. Shrivastava, Govt. Pre Secondary School, Neur, Tahsil Pandariya, Distribt Kabirdham (C,G.) Presiding Officer, Ward No.5 to 10. Nayab Tahsildar, Bodla, Returning Officer, Panchayat Elections, Janpad Panchayat Bodia, District Kabirdham (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATEVWRITIWRITS, DIRECTIONS ETC., IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE \ tum r m‘W‘ www r - mmmm‘m WW WW Dsepli SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 28-01 -2011 Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, couns.el for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for respondent No.1 and 7 on advance copy. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india, the petitioner'has sought issuance of a direction to respondent No.1 to decide and dismissthe election petition for non-compliance of mandatory provisions of the Ruies and dismiss the eiection petition on preiiminary grounds. From the pleadings and order sheets which have been placed on record, it appears that after the ev dence was recorded, arguments were heard and the matter was posted for orders, ‘l‘he petitioner has moved an application raising certain objecti with regard to non-compliance of mandatory provisions. The grievan e of the petitioner is that the Election Tribunal has not passed any order w atsoever on his application. As the petitioner has submi ed an application before the Election Tribunal, before the matter has bee finally adjudicated, the application filed by the petitioner shall be considered y the Tribunal in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observatio s, the petition is finally disposed off. it is made clear that this Cou has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/— Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [ate afmi