IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2008 / 2ND ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 32547 of 2006(Y) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------------- P.G.USHA DEVI, SENIOR ASSISTANT MANAGER, KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION, NORTH PARUR, RESIDING AT USHUS, EAST KADUNGALLUR, U.C.COLLEGE P.O., ALWAYE - 683 102. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.) RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPN., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. LT. COL. (RETD) K.G.RAMACHANDRAN, NOW HOLDING A POST OF MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM. 3. SRI. V.CHANDRAKANTH, PERSONAL ASSISTANT TO THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.MAJNU KOMATH, SC, K.S.W.C.- R1 TO 3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.32547/2006 Y APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE PETITION DTD. 17/04/2004 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE MANAGING DIRECTOR. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: EXT.R1(A): COPY OF THE INTIMATION NO.KSWC/ADMN 82/C.C./ 2006-2007 DTD. 14/06/2006 SENT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE SECRETARY TO GOVT.AGRICULTURE (UP)DEPT. EXT.R1(B): COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.KSWC/EST/GENERAL/ 2003-04 DTD. 4/07/2004 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.R19C): COPY OF THE INSPECTION REPORT NO.KSWC/RO-EKM/ INSP/06-07/568 DTD. 29/09/2006 ISSUED BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER,ALUVA. /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss V. GIRI, J. ------------------------------- WP(C).NO. 32547 of 2006 --------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT The writ petition was filed apprehending that the petitioner would be suspended or transferred from service on the premise that the third respondent, Personal Assistant to the Managing Director is exercising influence with the second respondent to do so. 2. A counter affidavit has been filed by the second respondent as also by the third respondent. The allegations of malafides are denied. At any rate, this court cannot interfere merely on apprehension. I take note of the submission made by Sri.Majnu Komath that subsequently disciplinary proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner and she has been transferred also. The said order of transfer has been independently challenged. In the result, the writ petition is closed without going into the rival contentions. V. GIRI, JUDGE. pmn/ WPC.32547 /2006 2