IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 14TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 21079 of 2008(H) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- A.V. GEORGE, ARAYASSERIL HOUSE, PULINKUNNU.P.O, KUTTANADU, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR SMT.BHAVANA VELAYUDHAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHANGANASSERY. 2. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM. 4. THE SECRETARY, HEAD LOAD AND GENERAL WORKERS FEDERATION (CITU), CHANGANASSERY. 5. THE PRESIDENT, HEAD LOAD AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION (INTUC), CHANGANASSERY. SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL FOR R1 TO R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO. 21079/2008-H APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE REGISTRATION PARTICULARS OF THE VEHICLE BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL-4/J.7871. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE REGISTRATION PARTICULARS OF VEHICLE BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER'S WIFE BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL4/R-5650. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT OF THE COMPLAINT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT OF THE COMPLAINT BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT OF THE COMPLAINT BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Rs/ K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== W.P.(C)NO. 21079 OF 2008 ============================ DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2008 JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair,J. The petitioner is running a small scale industrial unit called “Avees Milled Products”. Condiments such as chilly powder, coriander powder etc. are being manufactured, packed in small packets and distributed. He is also dealing in rice flour and wheat flour. Those goods are supplied in vehicles. The petitioner's employees are travelling in the vehicle to deliver the same to the shop owners. In Changanacherry, the local headload workers represented by respondents 4 and 5 claimed that they should be allowed to do the unloading work and to press that demand they are causing obstruction to the petitioner's workers delivering the goods. So, he moved the police seeking necessary protection against their obstruction and thereafter this writ petition is filed. 2. The learned Government Pleader, upon instructions, submitted that at present, there is no obstruction and the petitioners men are doing the delivery of the products of the petitioner to the shop WPC.21079/2008 -2- owners. If there is any obstruction from any side, the petitioner can bring it to the notice of the first respondent. In that event the first respondent will look into the same and take appropriate action as the occasion demands to remove the obstruction. The writ petition is disposed of as above. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE M.C. HARI RANI, JUDGE ks.