IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 20TH MARCH 2009 / 29TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 9018 of 2009(V) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ SHAHEENA.N,AGED 24,W/O.FAROOK, MALAYAMPALLY HOUSE,N.K.ROAD, THIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM-676306. BY ADV. SRI.PULIKKOOL ABUBACKER RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MALAPPURAM. 2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM. 3. PRINCIPAL, T.T.K.M.TEACHER TRAINING INSTITUTE, THEKKEKULAMBA.P.O, PARAPPUR, K0TTAKKAL-676503. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 9018 OF 2009 (V) ===================== Dated this the 20th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner was admitted for TTC course in the College of which the 3rd respondent is the Principal. According to her, now she has been told that she cannot appear for the examination. 2. The pleadings in the writ petition itself show that the reason for holding that the petitioner is ineligible to appear for the examination is that as against the minimum required percentage of marks in the qualifying exam, which is 48%, the petitioner had only 46.16%. Thus the petitioner was an ineligible candidate and could not have been validly admitted. 3. If that be the factual position, the admission granted to the petitioner is liable for cancellation and the stand taken by the respondents that she cannot appear for the examination cannot be faulted. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp