wmai Mw‘ (f. Lao // @@ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (s1 No..%... K01? 2009 PETITIONER /S. K. Sidar S/o Shri B. R. Sidar, aged about 33 years, Multipurpose Health ?“ Worker (Mal'e)' Community Health Center Lailunga Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS /1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Health and Family Welfare Department D.K.S.\ Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Health Services Raipur Dist. Raipur (C.G.) .3. Chief Medical Officer District Hospital Raigarh Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) / 4. Block’Medical Officer Community Health Center Lailunga Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA. RESPONDENTS 9% L1 ‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILA8PUR WRIT PEWTION (S) N0.7475 OF 2009 PETiTiONER S.K. Sidar Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (WritPetition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india‘; Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- $hri RS. Patei, Advocate for ihe peii‘uaner. shyi Shashank Thakur, Pane! Lawyer for the State. RESPONDENTS GREER 10RALQ (Passed or; this 4“ day of May, 201 O) 1 .WP t , (S) No.7335 of 2009 (decided on 29-3-2D’i0) ’i. Chalienge in th§s petition is to the order dated 31 -1 0-2009 (Annexure — PM) passed by the Chief Medical and Heaith Officer, Raigarh,_ whereby the order of appointmem dated 22-8-2003 (Annexure — P/6) passed in favour of the petitioner has been canceiled. 2. At the very outset, iearned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the identicai issue invoiving the same facts came into consideration before this Court in Jyoti Lakra v. The State of Othersi Chhattisgarh & Othersi and other connected matters, wherein this Court after having examined ail the aspects of the matter. ouashed the impugned order directing reinstatement of the petitioners therein without back wages. Liberty was reserved to the respondents therein to take appropriate action/steps in accordance with law. 3. Shri Thakur, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State, concurs with the submission made by the iearned counset appearing for'the petitioner and submits that the facts of the case on hand are identical to that of Jyoti Lakra (supra). 4. in view of foregoing, the impugned order dated 31-1 0-2009 {Annexure — PM) is quashed. The writ petition is allowed in terms of decision of this Court rendered in Jyoti Lakra (supra). 5. There shall be no order asto costs. Sd/- Gowri l Satish K. Agnihotri Judge