(k5 1%7/ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w“ P. (S) No. m (5‘ 12009 PETITIONER : . Shyama Shankar S/o Chandaram, about 44 Tribes Development, Mantralaya, ¢ DKS Bhawan , Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Department of Scheduled Caste and scheduled / Tribes Development, Raipur (OG‘) 3 N‘x Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development/ Welfare, Baikuthpur, District; Koriya (C.G.) ,4. Collector, Koriya Baikunthpur, District; Koriya (C‘GJ PETITEON UNDER ARTI€LE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDEAQ J ............... Eixg a Service, Presently Posted as Upper Division Teacher at Middle School, hes‘w w\N Salka, Block— Baikunthpur, $1u¢ District- Koriya (C.G.) VERSUS RESPGNDENTS : 1. Kétate of Chhattisgarh, Through—Secretary, Department of Schedukd Caste and scheduled W$1“., .m...13.Q2...w.&..L./.§gv00 mm<W> mmfvh mafsaaném WWWWW. agw‘anm Shri Rahul Jha'advocate o behalf of Shri Mahendra Dubey counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj GA/for he respondents/State. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 30.6.2009 passed by respondent No.1 by hich the petitioner who is working as Upper Division Teacher 'n Middle School Satka, Block Baikunthpur, District Korea ha been transferred to Girls’ Middle School, Odgi', District Sargujar Contention of the coun el for the petitioner is that the petitioner is an Upper Division eacher and the seniority of Upper Division Teachers is maintained istrict-wise. He further submits that if the petitioner is forced to go d join in the transferred place, he may lose his seniority. Counsel for the respon ents/State submits that let the petitioner make a suitable epresentation to the authorities concerned which would be deci ed in accordance with law. To this proposition of the State counsel' counsel for the petitioner showed' his agreement. However, he pr ys for an interim protection till the ix _ representation of the petitioner is decided by the authorities l K concerned. y i i pmaz eats gmtazr manta—:rs/osr—t 1 nooxvi .00. ooot ... , . M. nae—wt w.“ 4y at. WM. “Maw—ae- SB: tinker Diwake Hon. Mr. Justice P ’ r 08.08.2009: //, Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioner makes a representation to the authorities concerned within a period of 10 days fro n the date of receipt of copy of this order, the authorities concerned shalt decide the same within a further period of three weeks frt order impugned shalt be kept i petitioner. 3m the date of its receipt. Till then the n abeyance so far as it relates to the f i r, Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge r weaiizmire:wranwheria—eys/gs n/zgsg_1’m,aoo L ¥ ' '0' -M gemvvvtweee, wk; “MM m¥kmm W200 mWOEIW) WWW wmm WWW mm wm awimm