IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.5410-M of 2011 Date of Decision:29.3.2011 Dhani Ram .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Amit Rana, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The complainant-Dhani Ram sent a complaint to this Court by post praying that stringent legal action be taken against the accused as mentioned in the complaint. The said complaint was taken up on judicial side and treated as Criminal Miscellaneous Petition. Upon notice, reply by Badan Singh, HPS, ACP, Ballabgarh, Faridabad, on behalf of respondent has been filed submitting therein that Pinki wife of Shish Ram brother of petitioner Dhani Ram left her matrimonial house on 20.1.2011 at about 6.00 P.M. and did not return. It is further stated that on inquiry it was found that the wife of the brother of the petitioner had left the house due to harassment and beatings as stated by her on 2.2.2011 and she was found in Village Fatehpur Chandela, District Faridabad, where she was residing out of her own will. Further, the petitioner has given a statement, which is annexed with the reply, that he does not want to take any action on his complaint. The matter appears to Crl. M. No.5410-M of 2011 -2- have been settled. In view of the reply filed by the State, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. However, in case, the petitioner still has any grievance, he being an Advocate is at liberty to file criminal complaint or take any other legal course, if so advised and in accordance with law. 29.3.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE