THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1554 of 2010. Doon Vihar Sehkari Avas Samiti Ltd. and another. … Petitioners. Vs. The Sub-Registrar (First) Dehradun and another. …Respondents. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1. Date September 08, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means this writ petition, the petitioners have sought a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 7-8-2010 passed by Sub Registrar (First), Dehradun, in respect of release deed dated 8-1-2010 (Annexure No. 14), whereby the Sub Registrar refused to register the document. The petitioner has statutory alternate remedy to approach the District Registrar for registration of the document. The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternate remedy. However, it is provided that the petitioner may avail appropriate remedy before appropriate Forum, i.e. District Registrar, Dehradun. Since the petitioner has approached the wrong Court, the petitioner would be entitled to be given benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP