IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.229 of 2010 Between: M. Venkata Reddy ... PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF AND The Manager, Sri Pushpagiri Math, Main Road, NGO’s Colony, Kadapa Town and District ... RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT ORDER: Heard the learned counsel on record. 2. This Civil Revision Petition is filed as against an order made in I.A.No.1730 of 2009 in O.S.No.89 of 2005 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Allagadda. The learned Judge recorded the reasons as hereunder: “As seen from the averments of the affidavit of the petitioner and the schedule, admittedly, what sort of documents have to be produced is not shown in the petition. Even otherwise as contended by the counsel for the respondent/defendant, when it is the case that, the schedule property is of Pushpagiri Math, question of giving evidence by the Endowment Officer thereto does not arise. It is the case of the respondent/defendant that, the property under question i.e., of the suit falls within the purview of the Endowment Act and it is not necessary to say that it is of endowment. In view of this end that, no specific document is sought to be produced by the witness, this petition is of no avail. Hence, dismissed.” 3. In the light of the reasons recorded by the learned Judge, this court is thoroughly satisfied that there is no illegality in the order under challenge warranting interference of this court. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J February 24, 2010. PN THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.229 of 2010 February 24, 2010