WA 420/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R.SARMA (Amitava Roy, J) Heard Mr DK Sarmah, learned counsel for the appellant and Ms. B Gogoi Me dhi, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, Govt. of Assam for the offi cial respondents. For the order proposed to be passed disposing of the instant appeal, no formal notice to the private respondents is considered essential. The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 16.12.2010 passed by the l earned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 6147/2010 whereby taking note of the directions contained in the letter dated 20.10.2010 of the Director of Elementary Educatio n, Assam, the official respondents have been required to do the needful towards payment of salary of the respondent No.7. According to Mr Sarmah, the appe llant having challenged the purported promotion of this respondent to the post o f Headmaster of the school involved the direction for payment of his salary rela table to that post has the potential of pre-determining the issue against him. Ms Gogoi Medhi, however, submits that the arrangement for release of sal ary to the respondent No.7 has been on the basis of an order dated 18.11.2009(si c) passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 2044/2010 and dated 28.10.2009 in WP(C) No. 4504/2009. Be that as it may, on a reading of the text of the order impugned before us, we are left with the impression that the arrangement which has grieved the appellant is interim in nature and subject to the final outcome of WP(C) No. 614 7/2010. In the above view of the matter, having regard to the fact that the next date fixed for consideration of the aforementioned writ petition is 11.1.2011 o n which date the official respondents are required to produce the relevant recor ds pertaining to the selection of the respondent No.7 to the post of Headmaster, we are of the opinion that no interference at this stage is called for. This is more so as the impugned order clearly indicates that the matter would be decide d at the stage of admission hearing. This appeal thus stands disposed with the observation that the arrangeme nt whereunder the salary of the respondent No.7 in the post of Headmaster has be en directed to be released, would be subject to the outcome of the aforementione d writ petition. No costs.