Civil Revision No.1049 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1049 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.02.2010 Rajinder Singh ....Petitioner Versus Jaswant Singh & Others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.J.S.Yadav,Advocate for the petitioner. * * * Rakesh Kumar Garg,J.(Oral) Civil Misc. No.4317-CII of 2010 This Civil Miscellaneous application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Civil Revision Petition No.1049 of 2010 This revision petition has been filed by the judgment debtor challenging the impugned order dated 09.01.2010 whereby, the executing court has appointed the local commissioner to effect the demarcation of the property in dispute. Counsel for the petitioner states that there was no necessity of appointment of local commissioner afresh for demarcation of the property in dispute as already two local commissioners were appointed and their reports are on the file. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. While passing the impugned order, the Civil executing court has observed that the earlier local commissioner had not carried out the demarcation as per the instructions of the F.C., Haryana. Moreover by appointment of fresh local commissioner, no prejudice is going to be Civil Revision No.1049 of 2010 (O&M) 2 caused to the petitioner as on receipt of the report of the local commissioner, it will be open to the petitioner to submit his objection to the aforesaid report, if any. Thus, I find no merit in this petition. Dismissed. 22.02.2010 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) Seema-II Judge