IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.4383 OF 2009 Between: Jannu Suresh & 5 others … PETITIONERS And The State of A.P. & another … RESPONDENTS This Court made the following: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.4383 OF 2009 ORDER: 1. The petitioners 1 to 6/A1 to A6 are accused of offences punishable under Sections 452, 498A, 323/34 I.P.C. in C.C.No.194 of 2006 (C.C.No.546 of 2008), on the file of IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of the I Class, Warangal. A1 is husband of the second respondent/de facto complainant. A2 and A6 are brothers of A1. A4 is maternal uncle of A1. A3 is wife of A4. A5 is another relation of A1. It is alleged that on 14.01.2006 at about 11.15 hours when the second respondent was in her father’s house in Vidyaranyapuri, A1 to A6 along with others came there in TATA Sumo vehicle and entered into the house, beat her, her sisters and brother-in-law and abused them in filthy language and that A3 tried to pull her with her chunni and that A1 to A3 entered into kitchen room and dragged her outside and beat her with hands and that all of them demanded her for dowry and also questioned her purchase of house in her name and asking her to change her name for that house. The above allegations contained in F.I.R., statement of the second respondent given to the police under Section 161 (3) Cr.P.C. and also in the charge sheet undoubtedly attract the offences for which the charge sheet was filed by the police against A1 to A6. 2. It is contended by the petitioners’ counsel that the allegations are not true and probable having regard to other circumstances of the case. The said probabilities would be taken into consideration at the time of appreciation of evidence by the trial Court after completion of trial. Truth or falsehood of the cases cannot be gone into and decided in this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. I do not find any valid or legal reasons to quash proceedings in the criminal case pending against the petitioners. 3. Hence, the criminal petition is dismissed. ______________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J August 27, 2010 KL HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.4383 OF 2009 August 27, 2010 KL