t"l HIGH COURT OF CHHATT8SGARH AT BILASPUR SingleBench : Hon'bSe Shri H.L. Dattu, C.J. WntPetiiion No.2848 of 1990 Petltioners Respondents 1. Munidas Bairagi son of Bhusandas, aged about 42 years, Range Officer Kanker District Bastar. 2. Vidyadas Bairagl, aged about 32 years son of Bhusandas, teacher, High SchooE, Nagri. 3. Mst. Rambai window of Sukhudas aged about 50 years, village Khamaria, Tahsl! Dhamtari, DistS. Raipur Vs. 1. Mst. Kektibal wife of Mangalram aged about32years, 2. Mangalram son of Vishnuram aged about45years, Both ressdent of viilage Bajrang Nagar, Tahsit and District Raipur 3. First Additlonal District Judge, Raipur Present: Shri Bhaskar Payashi, counsei for the petitioners. Shri Ashish Shrivastava, counse! for respondents No<1 & 2. QRAL ORDER (Passed on 14 iVlarch, 2007) As on today, in my opinion, the reilef sought for in thls writ petitlon wouid not sur^lve for conssderation of thls Court. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners Is aiso of the same opinion. (2) In vlew of the matter, the wrlt petition is dlsposed of as havlng become infructuous. However, iiberiy is reserved to the petltloners to make an appropriate appilcation, if they so desire, for revlval of the writ petition. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- Chief Justice