IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11656 of 2011 Lalti Devi Versus Krishan Kumar Singh & Anr ----------- 02. 21.07.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application is directed against the order dated 16.04.2011 passed by Sub Judge X, Patna in Title Suit No.11 of 2006 whereby the learned Court below rejected the application filed by the defendant No.1-petitioner for comparing the signature of Sanjit Kumar who is a witness of the registered sale deed dated 03.12.2005 with his admitted signature. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the plaintiff is challenging that the signature of Sanjit Kumar of sale deed is forged and therefore, it is necessary that the said signature appearing on the sale deed may be compared with the admitted signature of Sanjit Kumar. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below found that the question involved in the suit to be decided is as to whether the plaintiff has got title over the suit property or not. From perusal of the plaint which - 2 - is produced by the petitioner before me, it appears that the plaintiff has prayed for declaration that the sale deed in question is void document. The learned Court below also found that in the suit, the matter which is being raised by the petitioner is not relevant for decision. In such view of the matter, I find no merit in this writ application and accordingly, it is dismissed. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)