COCP No.2576 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2576 of 2011 Date of decision: 09.12.2011 Mohan Lal and others ...Petitioners Versus Sh.Sameer Mathur, IAS, Principal Secretary, Home Department, Haryana and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. R.K.Malik, Sr. Advocate with with Ms. Renu, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Paramjit Batta, Addl.A.G. Haryana. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J. 1. This order shall dispose of COCP Nos.2576 and 2540 of 2011. Facts have been taken from COCP No.2576 of 2011. 2. The petitioners have approached this Court seeking initiation of proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for violating order dated 1.9.2009 passed by this Court in LPA No.96 of 1 COCP No.2576 of 2011 2009 whereby the petitioners were to be reinstated without insisting on financial benefits but with continuity of service only. 3. Upon notice, reply has been filed. Alongwith it, a copy of the order dated 6.12.2011 has been appended as Annexure R.1. Para 4 of the said order reads as under:- “And whereas, the matter has been examined and considered for compliance of the judgment dated 1.9.2009 and after consideration of the matter it has been decided that the petitioners be allowed to join service subject to the following conditions:- i) The petitioners will not be entitled to the financial benefits i.e. arrear of pay and allowances etc., for the period they remained out of service. ii) The petitioners will have to complete the training and the period of probation satisfactorily as per the rules. iii) Since a period of more than six years has passed after their services were dispensed with, their character and antecedents may be got verified and they may be got medically examined afresh before their joining service. iv) The joining of the petitioner shall be subject to the final decision of SLPs filed in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.” 4. A perusal of the above shows that the petitioners have been reinstated and allowed to join service subject to certain conditions mentioned above. 5. In view of the above, no further action is called for in these petitions. However, it shall be open to the petitioners to take 2 COCP No.2576 of 2011 recourse to legal remedies in accordance with law, if any grievance still subsists. 6. Both the petitions are disposed of accordingly. December 09, 2011 (Ajay Kumar Mittal) ‘gs’ Judge 3 COCP No.2576 of 2011 4