IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23161 of 2010 1. MANOJ SAH S/o Panchu Sah 2. MD.MISTER S/o Md Islam Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 03/ 01.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State. The allegation against the petitioners is that they and other accused persons kidnapped the informant’s daughter for illegal purpose. A perusal of paragraph 44 of the case diary reveals that the victim was recovered from the house of co-accused Ranjit Das. Paragraph 52 of the case diary reveals that statement of the victim has been recorded under section 161 Cr. P.C. in which she named the petitioners also but she specifically stated that while she was being taken by the petitioners and their associates, on way the petitioners got down from the tempo and thereafter she was taken by the co-accused Ranjit Das. Similar statement has been repeated by the victim recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C Considering the aforesaid facts and submissions, I direct the petitioners to be released on bail in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case no. 26 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))