IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23946 of 2009 BIPIN RAJBANSHI, S/o Arjun Rajbanshi. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.26428 of 2009 DINESH YADAV, S/o Udesh Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 06.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners are not named in the First Information Report nor identified in the Test Identification Parade and the police has got the petitioners identified by the informant after five days of the occurrence in a casual manner but there is no recovery from their possession, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 27 of 2009 subject to the following - 2 - conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)