(1) CRI.APP. 3614.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3614 OF 2010 1. Shivaji S/o Shankar Mahapure 2. Santosh S/o Jalindar Mahapure .. Applicants VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and anr. .. Respondents Mr. V.G. Salgare, Advocate h/f. Ms. Sadhana Jadhav, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. B.J. Sonawane, APP for the respondent-State ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 6TH SEPTEMBER, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. The applicants are apprehending their arrest in connection with crime no.I-173 of 2010 registered at Newasa Police Station for offence under section 143, 147, 148, 149, 326, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR reveals that the applicants have been assigned specific roles in the alleged assault on the injured by means of iron rod and axe. Not only that but in the Court of Sessions, (2) CRI.APP. 3614.2010 the Advocate representing them also fairly conceded to this fact situation. That is why the Sessions Court rejected the anticipatory bail Application. 3. The criterion for grant of bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not at all fulfilled because of prima facie evidence appearing against the applicants in connection with the alleged crime. Hence, the Application is dismissed. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp