IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 15848 of 2009 Between: Rafi Mohammed S/o Ismail, Muslim H.No.16-2-867/16/A, Jeevanyarjung Colony Saidabad,Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat Buildings,Hyderabad 2 The Sub Inspector of Police Saidabad Police Station Hyderabad 3 S.D Parveen W/o Rafi Mohammed,Muslim H.No.B/675 Hills Colony,Nagarjuna Sagar Nalgonda District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ or order direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not conducting the investigation in pursuant to the Crime No 81 of 2009 of Saidabad Police Station is illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional consequently direct the 2nd respondent to conduct the investigation in pursuant to the crime No 81 of 2009 of Saidabad Police Station. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.V.SUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION No.15848 of 2009 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not conducting the investigation pursuant to the Crime No. 81 of 2009 of Saidabad Police Station, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently sought for a direction to the 2nd respondent to conduct the investigation pursuant to the crime No. 81 of 2009 of Saidabad Police Station. The petitioner and the 3rd respondent are husband and wife and it appears there are disputes between them and in view of the same the petitioner-husband made a complaint to the Sub Inspector of Police, Saidabad Police Station, Hyderabd, against the 3rd respondent alleging that she has taken away his original certificates without his knowledge and the same was registered as Crime No.81 of 2009 of Saidabad Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 406 of I.P.C. Though the said crime was registered as early as on 25.02.2009, there was no progress in the investigation. Hence the writ petition. Head both sides. On instructions, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that the police registered the said crime on 25.02.2009 against the 3rd respondent and that they filed an application before the VII Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Hyderabad on 02.05.2009 seeking permission to search the house of the 3rd respondent and pursuant to the permission granted by the said Court, the police inspected the house of the 3rd respondent and recovered some documents. He further submits that the investigation in the said case is almost over and the charge sheet will be filed soon. In view of the aforesaid subsequent developments, this Court is of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to complete the entire investigation in Crime No.81 of 2009 and submit a final report within a period of Six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. ____________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 07-08-2009 Gsn.