IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1725 of 2010 Date of Decision: 23.08.2010 Satish Kumar .... Petitioner Versus Maya Devi and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Amrik Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. H.K. Brinda, Advocate for the respondents ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed challenging order dated 22.1.2010 passed by Addl. District Judge, Ropar whereby application moved by the applicant for taking action against the respondents for violating the order of status quo dated 23.1.2006 was rejected. While passing the impugned order learned Addl. District Judge, Rupnagar has observed that Maya Devi had only alienated her share in the property and she has not imparted any specific portion. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to argue the appeal on merits. Dismissed as withdrawn. However, learned Appellate Court shall consider the effect of the sale deed complained by the applicant. (ALOK SINGH) 23.08.2010 JUDGE reena