IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2010 / 26TH JYAISTHA 1932 WA.No. 929 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.9331/2010 Dated 25/05/2010 .................... APPELLANT(S): PETITIONER ------------------------------- E. NAZEER, S/O. IBRAHIMKUTTY, VALAKOTTU HOUSE, P.O. PERINGALA, KAYAMKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.ANIL SIVARAMAN SMT.APARNA RAJAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE SECRETARY, RTA, ALAPPUZHA. 3. ROSAMMA THOMAS, MAPPOTTIL THARAYIL, PALLIPPAD.P.O, HARIPAD, ALAPPUZHA. 4. KSRTC, REP. BY ITS D.T.O, ALAPPUZHA. 5. STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. BY SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR - S.C. FOR KSRTC. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: A.K. Basheer & P.Q. Barkath Ali, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A.No.929 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of June, 2010 Judgment Basheer, J: The Writ Petition filed by the appellant was dismissed by the learned single Judge, apparently recording the submission made by learned counsel on either side that the issue involved in the case was no more open to any debate or controversy, in view of the decision of this Court in Daji Tomy v. Transport Commissioner & Ors. (ILR 2010 (2) Ker. 461). 2. However Sri.Deepak, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that the larger issue involved in the case has been lost sight of by the learned Judge. He further submits that the decision rendered by the learned single Judge, even if it applies to the facts of the case, may have to be considered from a different perspective. 3. We refrain from making any comment on this submission at this stage. In our view, the remedy of the appellant does not lie before us. Appellant may, if so advised, seek the other appropriate remedy available to him WA.929/2010 : 2 : before the learned single Judge. With that liberty reserved in favour of the appellant, the writ appeal is disposed of. We reiterate that we have not considered the merit of any of the contentions raised by the appellant. A.K. Basheer Judge. P.Q. Barkath Ali Judge. an.