- 1 - Writ Petition No.206/2010 The grievance in this petition as is reiterated across the Bar is that after passing of the award, the State deposited the compensation amount in the reference proceedings. The respondent no.3, who was acting as Advocate, withdrew the compensation amount so deposited. It is not disputed by the petitioners that they have resorted to execution proceedings before the Civil Court for recovery of the compensation amount including from respondent no.3. The petitioners will have to pursue that remedy to its logical end. In the circumstances, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners, keeping all questions open to be decided in the said proceedings. The Executing Court may consider of expediting hearing of the execution proceedings in view of the peculiar facts of the present case as the petitioners, who are the owners of the land, claim to have been deprived of their compensation amount unjustly by the Advocate. (A.M. Khanwilkar, J.) (S.S. Shinde, J.) Dt/- 13.01.2010 ndk/c1311030