IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 4196 OF 2010 Between: Nimma Mohan Reddy ..... PETITIONER AND The District Panchayat Officer, Karimnagar District, Karimnagar and others .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 4196 of 2010 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the alleged action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner’s representation dated 18.04.2008 is arbitrary and illegal. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. A perusal of the representation said to have been made by the petitioner on 18.04.2008, shows that it was alleged by the petitioner that the respondents 4 to 6 herein were granted permission by the Gram panchayat to make construction over the land in Survey No.299 to an extent of Ac.0-31 guntas purchased by him under a sale deed dated 09.05.2005. It was also alleged that the respondents 4 to 6 had already made constructions up to basement, and were proceeding with further construction. Accordingly, a request was made by the petitioner to make the necessary enquiry and to restrain the respondents 4 to 6 to stop the constructions immediately. Alleging that the respondents failed to take any action, this writ petition has been filed. At the outset, it is to be noticed that the said complaint/representation was made long back in April, 2008 and it is not the case of the petitioner that the construction is still going on. That apart, the controversy raised by the petitioner involves various disputed questions of fact including a title dispute in respect of the plot in question. In the circumstances, the mandamus as prayed for cannot be issued. If aggrieved, it is for the petitioner to work out the appropriate common law remedy as available under law. Accordingly, granting leave and liberty to the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________ Date: 24.02.2010 G. ROHINI, J. Ivd