Shri uv v» HIGH couRT 9F cHHATTaseARH AT BILASPUR WP, £5} Na. 4372 of 2005 suni: Kumar 3mgh, son of 3M R. P. Singh, Assistant Teacher, Posted at Paimary Sachem, Bishunpuz. Bmck - Ambikapur. Distyici - Surguja (CE). Petitiener Respcndenta Versus 1. State Tribai 0f Development, Chhat§sgarh. Through Ministry Searetar-y', of Tribai wezfare Depamnent, Mantra!aya. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chha‘ttisgarh). CcmmissJQne—L Tribal Development, Bivisicit, Biiaseut. Tribai Assistant Commissioner, Deveicpment Surguia‘ Ambikapar Chhatiisgarh. SE: Haw {e Mr. Justiae $atish K. Agaihoti'i, J Anupam Bubey, Ad e! for the respandents!s!ate, vacate for the petitioner. Mam Sanka Jain, Pane! iawy ()RDER ' N‘ *he Csurt is §a55€d by Ehe faiiswirig aide. u. i The veiitiaaer whiie workirig a3 Assi3tam Tea Bishamuf, Bicack - Ambika‘gur Distiict- Surguia $chaoi, Paiigcti. Biack — Udaygaa csnéifians. viée impugrxed erder atea 5.10.2001 {Annexure N1). The Maéh% Piad$sii Administi'aiive Triburiai at F' 5.12002 difected ts mainwin statua xuaéIEU 4 A¢ {$a559d on this 13m day of iviarch, 2667) SaiishK. Agnihai‘i‘ J. Reipur viee interim erder qua in regard ta the eositicn ef the petitianer as was prevaiiing en 27.4. 2.2001. By virtue of the interim order the petitions;- is continuisg at the ofiginai piace sf pcstirg. with :he passage sf time :his petitian ‘a net appticable ferever. At this paint cf infructucu-s as pefias sf {fansfef is time there is m questioh is examine the vaiidity of the t Hswever, the iespondems aie at iiberi‘y’ ti) pass appiopriate ardem Be that as it may._ g» ii“ pubis iiiteisst and administrative exigency, withcut insistizt camsiiance at the impugned its, sfer cider. //7/ ii’s View iv ’/ ransfer Greer. r” keeping gen “cher at Primary $cheoi. wee transferred ts Primaryg Eistrict- Surguja‘ er. the eame terms anti has become Thakur @ ¥ £3 we}! 3e§t!ed mincipk sf Eaw that transfer Es ar: incident of service and §t £5 far the emp3syer tc decide a3 t0 wheye a partécu!ar cf§ce:fem9!o 'ee be paeted, keegmg m View pubm: interest as wel§ as administratéve exigency. Thés Court h e iimited Eurisdicfien ta §nterfere §n the €rensfer matter and this n 4:. ucutt can interfere eeiy in the caee et‘ proved maiafide. non-competence cf utheritv pessihg the transfer erder and transfer order not being in centermity with the ruies and regulations. in View of the abeve‘ this petiti n stands dispcsed of. Ne order as to costs. Sd/— Satjsh K. Agnihotri i Judge