BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Third day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.10684 of 2011 1 ASHOK KUMAR 2 SIVARAJAN @ SIVA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 AND 2 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN SOUTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL CR NO. 508/2011, DINDIGUL DT ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. J.LAWRANCE Advocate For Respondent : MR. A. RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as A1 and A2 and they were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 20.06.2011 for the alleged offence punishable under sections 341, 294(b), 323 and 302 IPC., in Crime No. 508 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioners are innocent person and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner in judicial custody for more than 60 days and hence, he prays for enlargement on bail to the petitioner. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners abused the defacto complainant and 1st petitioner have kicked the deceased as the result of which, he fell down and sustained injuries and subsequently, he died on the same day. He would further submit that the investigation has been over and charge sheet has been filed and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the petitioners are in judicial custody for more than 60 days and the charge sheet has been filed before the Court concerned. I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only)with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No. III, Dindigul, and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned daily at 10.30 am., until further orders. sd/- 23/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III, DINDIGUL 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLCIE TOWN SOUTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL, DINDIGUL DT 5 THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, SUB JAIL, DINDIGUL 1. CC to M/S. J.LAWRANCE Advocate SR.No.28681: DM::2011:AUGUST:24:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10684 of 2011 Date :23/08/2011 2P:7C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/