IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2008 / 31ST ASHADHA 1930 RP.No. 561 of 2008() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN SA.602/2000 Dated 17/07/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT ------------------------------------------------------ KERALA STATE HANDLOOM WEAVERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO:232. REP.BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER, WEST FORT ROAD, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI. M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SC HANDEX RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF --------------------------------- VADAKKEMADOM BRAHMASWOM, M.G.ROAD, THRISSUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.G.UNNIKRISHNON FOR R1 SRI.V.SANKARA RAJA FOR R1 SRI.K.SANEESH KUMAR FOR R1 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- R.P. NO.561/2008 IN S.A. 602 of 2000 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of July , 2008 O R D E R Heard Sri. M.K.Chandramohan Das, the learned counsel for the review petitioner and Sri.G.Unnikrishnan, the learned counsel for the respondent extensively. Though there is considerable merit in the submission of Sri.G.Unnikrishnan, that within the contours of this court's jurisdiction for review, it will not be proper for this court to grant any relief to the petitioner in review of the judgment which is virtually on consent, I am of the view that the review petition can be disposed of issuing the following directions; i) The Review Petitioner is directed to put the respondent back in possession of the decree scheduled building on or before 20.9.2008. ii) Subject to the condition that the above direction is obeyed by the petitioner, there will be a direction to the respondent to accommodate the petitioner temporarily in the third floor of the building presently under construction behind the decree scheduled property within a period of one year from 20.9.2008. iii) There will be a further direction that the respondent shall complete the re-construction of the plaint schedule building within two R.P. No.561/2008 2 years of 20.9.2008 and re -induct the review petitioner into the newly constructed building subject of course the review petitioner 's liability to pay the rent in accordance with the prevailing rates in the locality. iv). It is also made clear that nothing stated in this order will stand in the way of the petitioner and the respondents sorting out any other issues between them in any other manner. The Review Petition is disposed of with the above directions. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE dpk