/« {3 [V HIQ-H COURT OF CHHATTESGARH ET EILA$PUR Misc‘ Apgeal 5 1 [2002 AEPELLANT Natioaal Iasurance Co. LtdwDivisiorlal Eon—@Eeant I‘io. 3. Office Raipur Branch BQaspur RS. 81.. Tahsil Bila$pur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPGMDEN’EE L Smt. Reoati Bai Widow Jagarnath elaimaatg No. 1 a: 5 Railway aged 4G years Caste Kanwar. 2. K11. Rila Dfo Laté Jagamath Kanwar agai 12 years Cast€ Kanwar 3. §3ushpnath S/ 0 Lam Jagamath aged 10 Years Caste Kanwar 4. Anju D/o Late Jagamath aged 6 years Caste Kanwar No. '2 to 4 minors through guardian i mother Smt. Repati Bai Wiaow of Jagannath Chotoi Widow of Late Marhu aged 60 years Caste Ka11wa1‘ A11 resident of Sihar Post Sihar, Tahsil & RS. ShaHkargarh, Distt. Sarguja (cs). Gumdayal Singh Sio Godan' Konva aged 35 years Caste Koxwa Tractor Dm’ver Resident. of ViJlage Sihar Tahsil (‘35 RS. Shankargarh Distt. Sarguja (C.G.)'. Non —Applicant No. 2 U] New -—App§icant No. 1 6. Omkar Gupta 810 Bigu Sao aged 45 years Tractor Owner Tractor NO. CIL‘ 9942 resident of Village Sihar, Post Sihar RS. Shankargarh Distt. Sarguja (co). MEMGRANDUM OF APPEAL UNDER SECTIGN 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHECLES ACT 1988. (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Presenth Mr. Shreekumar Agrawal, Sr, Advocate with Shri Sudhir Agrawal, Advocate for the appellantr Shri V.K. Pandey, Advocate for the respondent NO. 7, OML— ORDER (Passed on 27f 02/ 2009} 1. During the course of argument, learned counsel for the appellaxlt submits that tribunal has passed the anal award axld the fmal award has been challenged therefore, he seeks to Withdraw this appeal. Prayer allowed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissad as Withdrawn M.C.P. No. 95/ O2 is also dismiSSed summarily. //l Sdl— ‘ T. P. Sharma Judge