IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4178 of 2011 RAKESH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 03.02.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been granted privilege of bail by order dated 02.12.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 30937 of 2010 with observation that the condition imposed upon co-accused Akala @ Akhilesh Kumar Jha vide order dated 24.08.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18954 of 2010 shall apply to the petitioner. It is further submitted that condition No. 1 in order dated 24.08.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18954 of 2010 creates difficulty because brother of the petitioner is a minor. So, in place of brother of the petitioner, father of the petitioner be permitted to furnish bail bond on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid submission, condition No. 1 of order dated 24.08.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18954 of 2010 stands modified in respect of the petitioner to this effect that in place of brother, father of the petitioner may furnish the bail bonds. Accordingly, the order dated 02.12.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 30937 of 2010 stands modified. Let this order be communicated to the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 94 of 2009 through fax a the cost of the petitioner. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)