1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 5851 OF 2011 Vishnu Rajaram Vairagade .vs. The State of Maharashtra & others ______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders. Registrars orders. Mr. A.S. Bhendarkar, Advocate for petitioner, Mr. N.W. Sambre, G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 3, CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C. J. & B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 5, 2011. P.C. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the voters' list for election to the Nagar Parishad, Desaiganj. Though the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30.6.2011 of the Collector, Gadchiroli in light of the election held in October, 2010, the petitioner in substance has made a grievance that about 316 voters are being deprived of their right to vote. In the affidavit in reply filed by the Sub- Divisional Officer, Desaiganj, respondent no.3 herein, it 2 is stated that the final voters' list for the election on 8 th December, 2011 is published after calling objections and taking revision of then voters' list afresh. Every care is taken by respondent no.3 to include all the voters in the final list including 316 voters for whom the petitioner has made a grievance. It is stated that the voters' list is published finally after taking into consideration migration of voters, death of voters from the said area, etc. In view of the above averments in the reply affidavit and also having regard to the fact that the election process has already commenced and the voting is scheduled on 8 th December, 2011, we do not consider this to be a fit case for interference of this Court in our extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. We also record the statement being made by the learned Government Pleader that the petitioner may take inspection of the voters' list from the Returning Officer. Subject to the above observation, the Writ Petition is dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE. J. *****