IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.607 of 2010 PRAMOD KAPAR & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 09/ 07.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioners, namely, Pramod Kapar and Akhilesh Kumar Choudhary seek their bail in connection with Andhratharhi P.S. Case no.70/2009 initially, registered under sections 343,414/34 of the IPC but in course of trial, the learned Judicial Magistrate, having found the case under section 364A of the IPC, committed the case to the court of sessions. Admittedly, kidnapped boy has been recovered from the house of petitioner no.2 and both petitioners were caught at the spot. It is apparent from case diary that when kidnapped boy was recovered from the house of petitioner no.2, both petitioners were brought before the kidnapped boy who identified them as his kidnappers. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for bail stands rejected. However, the learned trial court is directed to conclude the trial of the petitioner within nine months from the date of receipt of the order and if trial of petitioners is not concluded within the above stated period, they may renew their prayer for bail. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)