1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 45 OF 1999 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 165 OF 1998 Ushakant G. Damania ...Plaintiff Vs. Jagdishchandra J. Jhaveri & ors. ...Caveator/Defendants. WITH TS/23/1998 IN TP/137/1998 Kamlesh I Jhaveri & anr. ... Plaintiffs vs. Ushakant G. Damani ... Defendant Ms.Anklesha Thakkar with Mr.Brijesh Upadhyay i/b. Purnanand & Co. for the Plaintiffs. Ms.Kavita Shah for the Defendant. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 2nd February, 2010. P.C.- 1 In a Testamentary Suit/proceedings, all the family members have settled the matter and accordingly signed the Consent Terms dated 13.08.2009. It is counter signed also by their respective Advocates, which 2 is taken on record and marked "X". The other family members have no objection if these Suits stand disposed of in terms of Consent Terms. All the signatories to the Consent Terms are present in Court. 2 There is no dispute/objection about the identification, authorisation. The statement is made that the present Consent Terms are well within the frame work of law and the record. There are no third persons involved and/or will be affected by this Consent Terms. 3 The present Suits stand disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. 4 By order dated 17.04.1998, this Court has appointed the Receiver. In view of above Consent Terms, the Receiver also stands discharged, subject to usual costs and charges, if any. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)