1 wp4419.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4419 OF 2010 Ashish Anaji Rane & Ors. ...Petitioners vs. The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents Mr.Umesh Deshpande for the petitioners Mr.R.M.Patne, A.G.P for the respondent nos.1 to 3 Mr.Mahesh Joshi for respondent no.5 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 24,2010 P.C. 1 Rule. The learned A.G.P waives service for respondent nos.1 to 3. Respondent no.4 is not a necessary party. The learned counsel for the respondent no.5 waives service. Respondent no.6 is also not a necessary party. 2 The learned counsel for respondent no.5 on instructions states that instead of keeping the petition pending in this court, by setting aside the order of the Revisional Authority, the revision application be ordered to be heard afresh after permitting the respondent no.5 to implead the members of the Managing Committee of the society as parties. The said request is reasonable which deserves to be accepted. 3 Hence, I pass the following order : i) Impugned order dated 31st August 2009 is quashed and set aside and the revision application no.481 of 2 wp4419.sxw 2009 is restored. ii)The Revisional Authority will permit the respondent no.5 to implead the members of the Managing Committee of the concerned Society as party respondents. iii)The revision application will be heard afresh after notice to all concerned parties including the added parties. iv)The revision application shall be decided as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks from today. v) All contentions of the parties on merits are kept open. vi)The Revisional Authority to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. JUDGE