IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2010 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2223 of 2010() ----------------------------- CRA.69/2008 of II ADDL. SESSIONS COURT, TRIVANDRUM ST.2210/2006 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT -III, NEDUMANGAD ................... REVN.PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED: -------------------------------------------------------------- RASHEEDA, W/O.SUBAIR, M.K.M.HOUSE, MUTTIKAMOOLA, DALVAPURA P.O., PERINGAMMALA VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.K.SATHEESH KUMAR RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. LATHIKA, D/O.SUBHADRAMMA, CHILLA PAPPANAMCODE, PANAGODE, PERINGAMMALA VILLAGE. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM MATHEW (VETTOOR) R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. SABU SREEDHARAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn V. RAMKUMAR, J. ==================== Crl.R.P. No.2223 of 2010 ==================== Dated this the 9th day of December, 2010. ORDER The accused in S.T. No. 2210 of 2006 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-III, Nedumangad for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against her concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A. No. 10986 of 2010 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. Money, if any, deposited by the revision petitioner before the trial court pursuant to the orders, if any, passed by the superior courts shall be refunded to the revision petitioner/accused. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Dated this the 9th day of December, 2010. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv