1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1144 OF 2005 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER(ST.) NO.23256 OF 2005 Mr.Imtiaz Qureshi. ..Applicant. V/s. Prabhudayal Sohanlal Verma ..Respondent. Mr. N.M.Vaishnava i/b.Bharat Vaishnava & Co. for applicant. Mr.H.J.Lulia for D.J.Lulia for Respondent. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : JANUARY 9, 2006. DATE : JANUARY 9, 2006. DATE : JANUARY 9, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. I find substance in the argument of the respondent that no supporting material has been placed on record to justify the reasons for delay. In other words, delay is not sufficiently explained. However, in the interest of justice, as the delay is only of 43 days, this application is allowed on condition that the applicant to pay costs to the High Court Legal Services Committee quantified at Rs.3,000/- within two weeks from today. In other words, if the amount of costs is not paid within the specified time and proof of deposit is not produced 2 before the registry, the registry to treat this application as dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. Ordered accordingly.