THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Civil Revision Petition No.4381 of 2009 Date: 06-11-2009 Between Mulasa Koteswara Rao … Petitioner/respondent and 1. Gunda Venkata Lakshmi Kumari Saritha and 2 others … Respondents/ Petitioner & Respondents 2 and 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA Civil Revision Petition No.4381 of 2009 Oral Order: Heard Sri P.Prabhakara Rao, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. This civil revision petition is directed against the action of the Rent Controller cum Junior Civil Judge, Jaggaiahpet, Krishna district in entertaining and enquiring into the application I.A.No.583 of 2008 in R.C.C.No.4 of 2006, filed under Section 11 (4) of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 filed by the petitioner therein seeking to stop further proceedings in the main application. 3. In brief, the grievance of the petitioner is that though he was described as a tenant of the schedule premises, in fact, he is not a tenant but a landlord by himself in his own right. On the other hand, the RCC filed by respondent No.1 herein seeking eviction of the petitioner and during the course of enquiry, she filed an application under Section 11 (4) insisting the payment of rents and till such time not to proceed with the enquiry in the main RCC. 4. It is to be seen that it is already on record that the revision petitioner raised a counter-claim that he is the landlord by himself in his own right. When an application is filed contrary to his stand in the main RCC, he can as well resist the same by taking all objections permissible under law before the Court below and upon such objections being made, the Court below shall dispose of the same on merits. 5. Therefore, the present revision, in my considered view, is premature. 6. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. ___________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 06th November, 2009. Ak