•sy ^' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BSLASPUR DEVIS80NBENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI T.P. SHARMA, J. APPELLANT APPLICANT RESPONDESSITS NON-APPL8CANTS IVI.A.fQ No. 1615/2008 Smt.Kusum Devi, W/o. Shri Ramlal R/lahto, Caste-Kumhar, aged about 57 years, Permanent R/o, Village Fatehpur, Tahsil and District Jashpur (C.G.) At Present R/o. Behind Sub- District Jail Jashpur, Khajanchi Toli, Jashpur (C.G.) Versus 1 Hemant Kumar Ekka, S/o B. Ekka Uraon, aged about 29 years, caste- Uraon, Permanent R/o. Viilage Dhasma, P.s. Sanna, District Jashpur (C.G.) At Present Orient Public School, Jashpur Nagar, District Jashpur (C.G.) 2 Karlus Lakda, S/o. Alvis Lakda, Caste-Uraon, aged about 59 years, S/o Jariya, P.S. & Tahsil Jashpur Nagar, District Jashpur (C.G.) 3 The New iridia Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office-Satigudi Chowk, Raigarh, District Raigarh SVIisc. Appeal Under Section 173 of the IVSotor Vehicles Act. 1988 Present: . None for the appellant. ORDER (22nd October, 2009) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appeltant. ^ -K subbu G,^, 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, we are left with no otheroption, but to dismissthe appeal for want of prosecution. 3. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge