IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2010 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 31115 of 2010(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- S.VIJAYA KRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 42 YEARS, SON OF SREEDHARA PANICKER, VIJAYASREE, CC 1001, SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 010. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJASEKHARAN NAYAR SMT.K.N.RAJANI SMT.ANILA PETER SRI.G.ARUN GOPAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDERS, PWD OFFICE, AARYANAD, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/10/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 31115 OF 2010 (L) ===================== Dated this the 27th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Writ petition has been filed for a direction to restrain the employees and the contractor from entering into the plantation and altering its boundary or causing damages to the trees standing therein. 2. A statement has been filed by the 2nd respondent denying the allegations in the writ petition. In the statement, the respondent has specifically stated that there is absolutely no proposal to widen the road trespassing into any private property. It is also stated that the 2nd respondent has requested the Tahsildar, Nedumangad to demarcate the boundary of the road along the plantation and the demarcation is pending. In view of the averments in the statement, the apprehension on the basis of which the writ petition has been filed can be seen to be baseless, and therefore, recording the statement as above, the writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp