IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No. 2796 of 2008 Date of decision : September 27, 2010 Sudesh Trehan and another ....Appellants versus Sushil Loraya and others ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Ajay Singla, Advocate for Mr. IS Gill, Advocate, for the appellants Mr. RS Budhwar, Advocate, for respondent no. 1 only. L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties state that compromise has been effected between the parties before Mediator as recorded in proceedings dated 25.8.2010 of the Mediator and signed by some of the parties. The said compromise is accepted by counsel for the parties to have been effected. It is stated by counsel for the parties that the appeal may be disposed of according to the compromise. The case has, thus, been lawfully compromised. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise as recorded in proceedings dated 25.8.2010 of Mr. Swarn Sandhir, Mediator. The same shall form part of judgment and decree sheet. As per term and condition no. 5 of the compromise recorded in the said proceedings, possession of plot measuring 80 square yards shall be Regular Second Appeal No. 2796 of 2008 -2- delivered by appellant no. 2 to respondents no. 1 and 3 within one month from today. ( L.N. Mittal ) September 27, 2010 Judge 'dalbir'