IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 60 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 54 OF 2010 SMT. BARBINA PEREIRA VELHO AND 2 ORS., ... Applicants Versus SMT. REMEDIANA ARAUJO E VIEGAS (SINCE DEC.) THROUGH LR'S AND ORS., ... Respondents MR. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. Kankonkar, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. G. Teles, Advocate for the respondent no.1. Mr. M. Salkar, Additional Government Advocate for the respondent No.4. Coram:- A. S. OKA, J. Date:- 2nd July, 2010 P.C. Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the applicants and the learned Counsel appearing for the legal representatives of the first respondent. The legal representatives of the first respondent are the plaintiffs. Present applicants are the first three defendants. The appeal preferred by the applicants challenging the decree of the Trial Court has been admitted for final hearing. The execution of the decree as against the applicants will have to be stayed subject to condition of the applicants complying with the monetary part of the decree by depositing the requisite amount before this Court. The learned Counsel appearing for the legal representatives of the first respondent pointed out that the last part of the decree directing deletion of the name of Francisco Velho has been acted upon. In view of the said statement, the last part of the decree cannot be stayed. However, the deletion of the name will be subject to final outcome of the appeal. 2. Hence, the application is disposed of by passing following order : i) The execution and operation of the impugned judgment and decree except last part regarding the deletion of the name of Francisco Velho shall remain stayed till the final disposal of the appeal subject to the applicants complying with the money decree by depositing the requisite amount in this Court within a period of six weeks from today. (ii) If the amount is not deposited within the stipulated period, the stay will stand vacated without further reference to the Court. (iii) As and when the amount is deposited, the same shall be invested in a fixed deposit till disposal of the appeal. (iv) It is made clear that in the event of the applicants succeed in the pending reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, they will not be entitled to withdraw the enhanced compensation without prior permission of this Court. (v) It is made clear that the Reference Court is free to proceed with the pending reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act,1894. (vi) The deletion of the name of Francisco Velho will be subject to final outcome of the appeal. (vii) The application is disposed of in above terms. A. S. OKA, J. SMA