IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.23240 of 2010 Date of Decision : December 23, 2010. Pankaj Narang .....Petitioner versus M/s ICICI Bank and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Neeraj Khanna, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the measures taken by the respondent-bank under Section 13/14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 2002 Act'). In view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 26.7.2010 in Civil Appeal No.5990 of 2010 (United Bank of India versus Satyawati Tondon and others), I am of the considered view that the petitioner has got an efficacious alternative remedy to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the Act. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of by relegating the petitioner to the afore-stated alternative remedy. C.W.P.No .23240 of 2010 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the respondents are bent upon to dispossess the petitioner from his only residential house without following the prescribed procedure. Considering the totality of the circumstances and to enable the petitioner to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal, it is directed that dispossession of the petitioner shall remain stayed for a period of two weeks. Dasti. December 23, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE