WW, m, WEI Mg ,y ~\ Pafhak7- M v‘ _ Court The impugned Transfer or even affer lapse of more ’rhar circums’ronces, fhe fransfer orc redundanf and meaningless with submits ’rha’r he has no objecfion order impugned is se’r aside wi appropriafe orders in The maf‘h under The adminisTraTive exigenC). In view of above submissim / der could no’r be given effecf fo one 6i half year and in fhese er of Annexure P-1 has become The lapse of Time. He furTher if The peTiTion is allowed and The Th liberTy To The STaTe To pass zr of Transfer of The peTiTioner r 1 of learned counsel for The STaTe, The insTanT peTiTion is allowed arild Theimpugned Transfer order of Annexure P-1 daTed 26.06.200 peTiTioner, is hereby seT aside. liberTy To pass appropriaTe ordei peTiTioner in The evenT of‘adminis i i Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra 7, so far as iT relaTes To The However, The STaTe shall be aT 's wiTh regard To Transfer of The TraTive exigency. L CerTified copy as per rules Judge RT]? $2.”...nuué:%‘§m§ 'mm f W 200 it} 1mm (W) m anm ammm mmma m WW wma‘f d fzdT 11m a? W W