%”W2‘,.. $lngie Bench m THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. PETITIONER Iéameylal Sahu, aged 56 years, S/o Shri Dev Ram Sahu, H.M., Primary School, Sabriya, Block Pamgarh, Distt. Janjgir—chapa C.G. VERSUS The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through — The Secretary, RESPONDENTS {1) / School Education Department, D.K,S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) / District Education Offmer, Jangirchampa District Jangirchampa ( C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA EOE ISSUANCE OF \VRIT OR MANDAMUSlDiRECTiON OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. OF SB : Hon’ble shri Manindra Mohan $‘nrivastava, J. 05-07-2011 Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State c With the consent of learned nsei for the parties, the matter is heard nnaliy, The petitioner is appointed on fixed pay of Rs.100/‘. Aher successfully completing the§probation period of 2 ye rs, he was granted reguiar pay scale. Learned counsel appearing fr the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is as to whether, t e petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial ap ointment or after completion of probation periool The issue involved herein was onsidered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O A.No.2745l89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others v. State ofM.P. & others), w erein, it was held that the simiiarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay cale with effect from the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken u to the Hon‘ble Supreme Court in special Leave Petition (Civil) No6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon‘ble Supreme Court, upholding the decisi n of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are enttt ed to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. Learned counsel appearing fort e petitioner further submits that this Court, while considering the same issue Amar Sai Ram & Others vi State of Chhattisgarh & Others [\N.P,(S) No 25/2006] by order dated 01/09/2006, I allowed the petitioners to make a re resentation within a period of ten days, raising all their grievances and in turn he concerned respondent was directed to Mmmmwms _.. c . mm, naatattia—FSIMo—znot 1—1 ,so,ooo. i . 7 mm 00 mmm (W) Wwm «1mm zamnn&aa§w ~R_ decide the representation in an objecti‘ the date of receipt of the representation Learned counsei for the petition has issued an order on 5/01/2011 (Ar that those who have been appointed t: are entitled to regular pay scaie frc successfui completion of two years pert Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make representation raising all his grievance, in the light of the 05/01/2011, and in turn, the concerr representation, if any, in accordance wr three months from the date of receipt c of the facts. In view of the foregoing, this peti :ion is disposed of. No order as to costs. WW WWR awimm Daepli «e manner within a period of 3O days from er further submits that now the State Govt nexure P/5) wherein, 1t has been ordered efore 1982 and after 1995 on a fixed pay, m the date of initiai appointment upon od of probation aforesaid judgment and circular dated ed respondent is directed to decide the th law) on its own merits, within a period of fthe representation, subject to verification Sdl— Manmdra Mohan Shrivastava Judge . toiéiwZQé.....ll m2 WWW, amia—Fsmo—uz/zoi 1—1,so,ooo.