IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF BILASPUR (CG. Slngle Bench CHHATTIsGARH AT ) w.P. (s) No. °‘>‘L\-(? /2o11 / :1. Namd Ram Sahu, aged abpu’r 58 year's; / are en R ahu Head asfgr, vernme iy Shool Margkala lock h‘ Dsff Norh Buste ker ( PETITIONERS So L’ Likh am S M Gonf Prmgr‘ c, ‘ro, B Cafama, i. ‘r r Kan C.6.) . /Ud inh ar, age ouT 57 I ‘ ye's S ‘ Sin, H asr', em imy Scl ola, Blo hm h‘ orh Bs‘ an‘ 6.6.) / 3 ar, /o‘, Heera gh ead m’re Govrnme‘ Prar- hoo ' GoTiT ck Cama Dis. Nr’ aTer Kker ( . d ing Diwan, b‘ 5 rs ssia Te _ n m cool Governmef Priary Sh Hganr‘ lock a, ‘ . NTh Baser‘ nker (C.G' injha, B Charam Disft or T Ka .) RESPONDENTS ': 1. a STaTe of Chhaf’risgar‘h Through Secre’rary, School EducaTion Departmem‘ /D.K.S. Bhawan} Raipur (C.G.) The DirecTor‘ Public Insfrucfions, Raipur (6.6.) ’ . DisTr‘ic‘r EducaTion officer Nor’rh Bas‘rer‘ Kanker (C.6.) Z e Sg KanW‘ d ab Inal Sh aged aour 8 yea, AsTn’r‘ eachr, VERSUS / 3 4. oiT ir'c Jn De / pension, No Tor', Treasury, accoun’rs, CONSTITUTION OF INDIA r’rh BasTer Kanker (C.G.) I WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE . .MCs) 3M3!“ 4 m’zoo Mm(ma) ‘ matww am ‘ W wm’ $31‘fdwm SE : Hon’bie Shri Manindra Niche n $hriva§tava. J. ' benefii based on circuiar dated 5/1 / 1 the petitioners. f ' 23-06-2911 . ‘ > w, Shrj D.N,Prajapati, counsei Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Adv cate Generai for the State. z :He‘a'rd ’on' admission, Learned counsei appearing the petitioners submits that the petitioner is entitled td grant of regular pay sca e from the initial iiate of appointment in View of ‘circular dated‘5/01I20‘i 1, issued b the State Government and in view of order passed by the Madlfya Pra'desh ate Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.F\.No.2745l89 (Madhukant Yadu nd 56 others v. State of MP. & others), which iater on attained tinaiity, as S. .P..against the same, was dismissed by the Supreme ¢ourt aiso. Learned c unsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents may be directed to con ider the case of the petitioners. On the other hand, teamed c unsel for the respondents submits that if the petitioners claim benefit of Circuiar ated 5/1/2011, the petitioners ought to have first approached the respondents, cl iming such benefit. Taking into consideration th submissions made by the parties and also taking into consideration that orde have been passed in number of oases, petitioners are granted iiberty' to pproach respondent authorities, claiming 1. lf the petitioners stand on th same footings as per order passed by the SAT in Madhukant Yadu (Supra) nd subsequently confirmed by the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civi No.6892/93, the petitioners may be entitied to same reiief. ; With the aforesaid observatio s, the petition stands tinaiiy disposed off. r . Sd/- nindra Mohan Shriva ava‘ ‘ Judge ‘ ‘ r t 1 a