IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6745 of 2007 Date of decision: 17th November, 2008 Sarita Dogra … Petitioner Versus Surinder Singh … Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gorakh Nath, Advocate for the respondent. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Rent Controller had allowed the application of the tenant and permitted to affix the door at her own costs upto Rs.500/-. An application was filed for modification by the landlord before the appellate authority. The appellate authority, taking into consideration the report of the Local Commissioner, ordered that the gate affixed should not be locked and no obstruction be created for the landlord for approaching the portion under his possession. Therefore, no interference is called for. It is admitted by the parties that vide Annexure P-2, the eviction petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 has been instituted. Rent Controller is directed to decide the eviction petition within six months from today so that parties, who are in dispute and are not living in harmony, can have their decision. With these observations, present revision petition is disposed off. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE November 17 , 2008. rps