IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.6669 of 2010 MANOJ MAHTO, son of Shri Nagina Mahto Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 10.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 341, 323, 324, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Even though the petitioner has been named in the First Information Report as one of the persons, who repeatedly assaulted the injured with knife, he remained absconding due to which the case of the co-accused was committed to the court of Sessions and the trial is going on. Under the circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected. The learned Magistrate is directed to immediately commit the case of the petitioner so that the petitioner’s case could be amalgamated with the Sessions Trial of other co-accused. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)