HIGH COURT OF CHHAT I‘ISGARH AT B ' ‘ ‘ ' Wm Petmon (S) No 050 (£2009 ‘i 1 ‘ F < ! I P. Ram Krishna Rae, s/o Late Shn' P Rama Rao, aged about‘61 years, R/o Door NO. 11-4-1/20, {T-4z Rockdale Residency, Ramnagar, Vishakhapatnam-530002 (AP). ‘ PETITIONER; RESPONDEN$§ _: 1. Food Corporatlon of Indla through Managing Direotor I ‘ i V r Head Quarter-New Delh1 16-20 Barakhamba Lane New ' Delhi. _ ' ‘ 3 2. z The Executive Director; Food C;orporation of’India, Dhiraj Arma Building, Near Anant E‘Kanekar Police Station, ‘ BanyirafEastmumbgi-moosi.g r 3. The'General Manager Food Corporation of India Ring Road Chouraha, Tehbandha Ralpur Chhatt1sgarh 4. The Area Manager Food Corporatron of Indra Madeena Budding, Jarl Road, Ralpur Chhattlsgarh 5. The Employees Provrdent Fund Organizatlon Through Commissroner Reglonal Office 8 & 9m Floor Mayur Bhawan Connaught Clrcus New Delhi- . (WRIT PE HTION UNDER ARTILLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTI'l UTION OF INDIA) (SB Hon‘ble M1 Satlsh K Agnlhotn, J ) Present : Shr1 Pankaj Shrlvastava Advocate f01 the petrtroner Shri Roshan Dubey, Advocate appears on behalf of Shn B P Gupta Advocate for the respondent No l to 4 ORAL ORDER - (Passed on 29 T...“ day of February, 2009 1. ’7 With the consent ofthe'parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. V 2. learned counsel appearmg for the petitroner subrnlts that the petltroner does not want to press thls petit1on on ments except that the petrtloner be perrmtted w 7 _ to make a representatwn 1n terms ofthe order dated 24 10 2007 passed by thls _ — L court 1n W P (S) No 6236/07 (J P Sahu Vs Food Corporation of Indra & E t ”Others) - r ILASPUR‘ ‘ ) . 3. Shri RoSEI‘all Dubey, Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nd tc; 4 have no objection. é/ 4. The petition is accordingly disyosed of in the sam ms as undexvr?” "Accordingly, i1: is directed that if so ac'iiiised, the petitioner niay file a detailed representation before respondent‘sNo. l along with a copy of tlns'gorder and a c lpy of thel'Writ Petition Within a period of three weeks mum today and if ‘sitch a representation is filed and the concemed documents :o'fthe petitioner have not been forwarded by the respondent No. l to respondent No. 5, respondent Nol l, in turn, shall examine the points raised by the petitionerland forward the papers relating to the pension ofthe petitioner to respondent No. 5 Within a period of 6O days from the date of receipt of the saidrepresentation or shall dispose ofthe representation in accordance with law within the said period. ‘ ' already forwarded, this order shall carry 110%!!! l‘ In case, the concerned documents of the petitioner are Thakur kl-v. U , Sd/— . \ i _ t Satish K.Agnihom . “d? , ’c ; (