IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2001 of 2010. Sartaz Parveen D/O Sri Azizurehman. … Petitioner. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and three others. …Respondents. Mr. D.S.Patni, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. N.P.Sah, Standing Counsel, learned counsel for the respondents. Date November 25, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Interim Relief Application No. 9889 of 2010) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to issue a domicile certificate/permanent resident certificate to the petitioner. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner moved an application before the Up Ziladhikari, Kashipur, district Udham Singh Nagar for issuance of the said certificate copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-8 to the writ petition, which is still pending for disposal. Learned counsel urged that a direction may be issued to the respondent no.3-Up Ziladhikari concerned to decide the application of the petitioner within a time frame and the writ petition may be disposed of accordingly. Prayer is innocuous. The respondent no.3-Sub Divisional Magistrate/Up Ziladhikari Kashipur is directed to decide the application of the petitioner (Annexure-8 to the petition) in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of one week from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP