Civil Writ Petition No. 15646 of 2009 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Writ Petition No. 15646 of 2009 Date of Decision: 30.11.2009 M/s Bhagwati Rice Mills …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. R.S. Modi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Hari Pal Verma, Advocate for respondent No.5. None for respondents No.6 and 7. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) On 23.11.2009, this Court had passed the following order:- “Counsel for the respondents pray for an adjournment to file written statement. Mr. Hari Pal Verma, Advocate for respondent No.5 stated that the petitioner-mill has not supplied the rice as per the specifications laid by F.C.I., therefore, he has been asked to replace rice beyond rejection limit (BRL). Counsel for the petitioner has stated that rice which has been rejected never belonged to the petitioner and in para 6, petitioner has specifically averred that the concerned officers were demanding Civil Writ Petition No. 15646 of 2009 2 bribe and those who were able to do the needful, their rice was accepted. Counsel further states that in case any officer specify that the rice supplied by the petitioner is beyond rejection limit, petitioner is willing and ready to replace the same. Upon this submission made, counsel appearing for respondent No.5 seeks time to file reply. He further states that any officer can be deputed to satisfy the unfounded insinuations made by the petitioner. He further submits that the concerned officer shall remain present in the Court. Adjourned to 30.11.2009. Copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of the Court Secretary”. Today, R.K. Seth, Manager (Quality Control) is present. He has stated that in case petitioner appear before him on 3.12.2009 at 10.00 A.M., then the quality of rice supplied by the petitioner will be checked in his presence and he will be acquainted with the result. Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the statement made by Manager (Quality Control), petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition. As prayed, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge November 30, 2009 “DK”