IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3352 of 2010 SMT. RAM PYARI DEVI Versus MOST. BANARSI DEVI & ORS. ----------- 2. 22.09.2010 1. This petition has been filed for restoration of S.A. No. 120 of 2005, which was dismissed for default due to non- compliance of peremptory order dated 26.02.2010 of this court by which two weeks time was allowed to the appellant to take steps for issuance of notice upon the respondents. 2. Considering the averments made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the statements made in the petition, it appears that genuine reasons have been show due to which the said peremptory order could not be complied within the prescribed time. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he had complied the said order on 15.03.2010 with the only fault, but Talbana notice was not filed for notice to Respondent no. 6 which was subsequently added. 3. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed and S.A. No. 120 of 2005 is restored to its original file and number. However, this order will be subject to compliance of the said order dated 26.02.2010 with respect to Respondent no. 6 also within one week. Sujit (S. N. Hussain, J.)