1 S.A. 246.2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 246 OF 2011 Sangram Raosaheb Gaikwad & Anr. V/s Shobha Vishwambhar Dhade & Ors. Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders ................................ CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 08/08/2012. Mr. Milind Patil, Advocate for the Appellants. Mrs. R.K.Ladda, A.G.P. for the State. ................................ PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr. Patil, learned counsel for the appellants. 2. The learned counsel submits that though the Suit was filed in a representative capacity and even under the provisions of Order I Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure [ For short, ‘ C.P.C. ’ ], no procedure as laid down under Order I Rule 8 of the C.P.C. was complied and the learned District Judge has clamped blanket injunction on all the members of the community. 3. According to the learned counsel, the learned District 2 S.A. 246.2011 Judge has perversely appreciated the evidence. The trial Court had considered the totality of the evidence and had dismissed the Suit. 4. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable in four ( 4 ) weeks i.e. 05/09/2012. The learned A.G.P. waives notice for respondent nos. 2 to 4. Till the next date, the parties shall maintain status-quo in respect of the suit plot. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ] KNP/S.A. 246.2011