IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH : HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH (27TH) DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN Present: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Civil Revision Petition No.5722 of 2007 Between: Alluru Appa Rao … Petitioner And: The Superintendent Engineer, AP Transco, Hyderabad & 0thers …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Civil Revision Petition No.5722 of 2007 ORDER: This revision petition is directed against the order dated 23.11.2007 in IA No.1143 of 2007 in OS No.329 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Bhongir, wherein the said application filed by the petitioner herein seeking a direction to the respondents to file undertaking affidavit, was dismissed. 2. Heard both sides. Perused the record. 3. The petitioner herein filed suit OS No.329 of 2007 for permanent injunction restraining the respondents from conducting survey for erecting poles for laying high tension wires in his agricultural land of Ac.6.43 guntas in Sy.No.162/124 of Bommala Ramaram village. The petitioner filed IA No.757 of 2007 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC for temporary injunction and also filed IA No.1143 of 2007 seeking a direction to the respondents to file an undertaking affidavit or in the alternative to grant interim orders. The respondents filed counter, opposing the application and contending that the private parties owning agricultural land cannot prevent the electricity authorities from laying electrical poles and also for passage of high tension electrical wires from their lands under the provisions of Electricity Act 2003 and the Indian Telegraph Act. The trial Court by impugned order dated 23.11.2007 dismissed both the applications. Aggrieved by the order in IA No.757 of 2007, the petitioner filed CMA No.4 of 2008 before the Senior Civil Judge Court, Bhongir. 4. It is stated that the said appeal was dismissed on 29.10.2008 and the said order has become final. When the main application for injunction i.e., IA No.757 of 2007 was dismissed and the appeal CMA No.4 of 2008 was also dismissed, the question of giving any direction to the respondents to file undertaking as sought for does not arise. The present revision, which is filed against the dismissal of IA No.1143 of 2007 has virtually since become infractuous. This Court, while admitting the revision, initially directed maintenance of status-quo as on 18.12.2007. Subsequently, by order dated 05.09.2008 in CMP No.3922 of 2008, order of status-quo was vacated. This Court further directed the respondents to pay any compensation, as per law. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the interim order has not been complied with. It is open to the petitioner to avail other remedies available under law to receive the compensation, if any, payable by the respondents. 5. In the result, the civil revision petition is disposed of with liberty as stated above. No order as to costs. __________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Date: 27.04.2011 bss