WP(C) 4663/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Parag Jyoti Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. J. Hand ique, learned State Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. The respon dent No.5 has not entered appearance, despite service of notice. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that though on 10th J uly, 2010 he lodged an FIR with the Officer-in-Charge of Dhing Police Station al leging murder of his son, Anarul Haque, aged about 23 years, by the persons name d in the said FIR and on the basis of which Dhing Police Station Case No.129/201 0 under Section 302/34 IPC has been registered, no investigation worth mention h as been carried out by the Investigating Agency. In the backdrop of such assertion of the petitioner, this Court issued notice of motion and directed the respondents to file affidavit. An affidavit on behalf o f the respondent No.3, the Superintendent of Police, Nagaon has accordingly been filed on 14th June, 2011 giving the details of the investigation carried into t he said Police Station case and also about filing of the report in final form, a s required under Section 173 Cr. P.C. because of insufficient evidence against t he arrested accused persons. It appears from the said affidavit that the investigation was conducted, on comp letion of which, the report in final form has been submitted. If the petitioner is still aggrieved by submission of such report, as required under Section 173 Cr. P.C., he may take appropriate legal action permissible under the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of allowing the petitioner t o seek appropriate remedy before the appropriate criminal Court under the provis ions of the Cr. P.C. No costs.