IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8795 of 2010 JADU NANDAN PRASAD S/O LATE BRAJ BIHARI LAL R/O D. 99 P.C.COLONY, KANKARBAGH, P.S. KANKARBAGH, DISTT.- PATNA. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BUDHA MARG, PATNA. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 18.5.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-Corporation as also the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of arrears of revised pension. It is submitted that the grievances have not been settled despite representation filed by the petitioner, as contained in Annexure 1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Corporation submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be considered as per law. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna (respondent no.2). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as 2 raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)