In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. R.S.A.No.1655 of 2007 (O&M). Decided on Sept 25,2007. Gurdial Singh and another --Appellants vs. Joginder Singh -- Respondent. Present: Mr.Chanchal K.Singla,Advocate,for the appellants. Mr. Hitesh Kaplish ,Advocate,for respondent . Permod Kohli, J:(Oral) This appeal is directed against the order dated April 18,2007, passed by learned District Judge, Kapurthala, which reads as under:- “ Deficiency of Court fee has not been made good, hence, the appeal is rejected. File be consigned to record room”. The order does not reveal anything beyond the fact that the Court fee has not been paid. In order to attract the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11 (b) read with Order 41 Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, the Court must specifically state about the direction to pay the Court fee within specified period and failure of appellant to do so. Nothing has been said about it. The order is not sustainable in the eyes of law and is, accordingly, set aside. R.S.A.No.1655 of 2007 (O&M) -2- At this stage, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants are willing to pay the Court fee as may be directed. Accordingly, the case is remanded to the learned District Judge, Kapurthala. The appellants shall deposit the Court fee within four weeks from today, failing which the Appellate Court shall be at liberty to pass any appropriate order in accordance with law. The parties are directed to appear before the learned District Judge, Kapurthala, on October 31,2007. Appeal stands disposed of Sept 25,2007 (Permod Kohli) RR Judge