IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 2ND JANUARY 2009 / 12TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 60 of 2009(F) ----------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- AMRITHA JAYAKUMAR, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER JAYAKUMAR P.K., S/O.KUNHAMBU PODUVAL, RAMANTHALI, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.AMARESAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE GENERAL CONVENOR, KANNUR DISTRICTSCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2008-2009, GOVERNMENT BRENNAN HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THALASSERY. 2. THE GENERAL CONVENOR, PROGRAMME COMMITTEE, 49TH KERALA SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2008-2009, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No. 60/ 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT In the Kannur Revenue District Youth Festival, the petitioner's team had participated in Group Dance. According to the petitioner they were given 2nd prize with A Grade. They had filed an appeal and that was rejected by Ext.P1. It was in these circumstances, the writ petition has been filed. 2. On instruction, the Government Pleader submits that the petitioner was given only the 3rd prize. It is also stated that the difference in marks between the petitioner and the first prize winner was 12. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there were defects in the performance by the first prize winner. WP(c).No.60/2009 /2/ 4. First of all, neither the judgments nor the first prize winner are impleaded in this writ petition. Nothing has been placed on record in support of the contention that is now raised. 5. It is also contended that it is because of the tribal touch in the dance that the first prize has been awarded to the first prize winner. It is obviously because of the best performance of the first prize winner, that they have awarded first prize. On these allegations made, I am not inclined to interfere. Writ Petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.60/2009 /2/