^ ^T-~V.-' -""•' - c IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (227L N0. A^C??- /2010 PETtTCONER/ RESPONbENT N0. 1 ^ ^°^\ ^f?>^^ /''•n'^"^'>" ^- ^?y ^' .V ^ RESPONbENTS Mulchand Kalar, S/o Ratiram Kalar, aged about 65'years, Occupation-Sarpanch, village panchayat Basin, Janpad Panchayat Sakti, R/o Village Khaira, Tahsit Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS ^: 1. State of Chhattisgarh. Through - The Secretary, Department of Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) y 2. Cotlector, bistt. Janjgir-Champa (C.6.) ^3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) /4. Chhote Lal, S/o Ramdayal, R/o Village Turri, Tahsil Sakti, bistt. Janjgir-Champa (C.(7.)clop^!a!iir) ^ r 1 ^ ^5. Nammoo S/o Dayaram Yadav, R/o Village Basin, Tahsil Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ^6. Hemant Kumar, S/o Kunjram, Gabe\. R/o Village Basin, Tahsil Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) /J. Kripan Kumar Chandra © Jyoti Chandra, R/o Village Basin, Tahsil Sakti, bistt. Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) ^8. Presiding Officer, Pooling Booth No. 76. ^9. Presiding Officer, Pooling Booth No. 77. 40. Presiding Officer, Pooling Booth No. 78. Gram Panchayat, Basin, Tahsil Sakti, Through its Returning Officer, Janpad Panchayat Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 11. Returning Officer (Panchayat) Janpad Panchayat Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Chamapa (C.G.) p. rT-- @^9 WRIT PETITEON UNbER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTCTUTION OF INblA ^ HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (227) N0.2807 OF 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENT Mulchand Kalar Versus State of Chhattisgarh & others (Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Anil Singh Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 21st day of June,2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with a liberty to take appropriate steps by filing election petition before the Election Tribunal. Learned counsel appearing for the respondenV State has no objection. 2. It is ordered accordingly. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge