In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh L.P.A. No. 767 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 02, 2011 M/s Samrat Forging Limited ---Appellant versus Union of India and another ---Respondents Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH *** Present: Mr.P.S.Rana, Advocate, for the appellant *** 1. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M.Kumar, J. 1. The instant appeal under Clause X of the letters patent is directed against the judgment dated 25.3.2011, rendered by learned Single Judge holding that the denial of supply of information to the appellant vide order dated 17.3.2010(Annexure P-5), was justified and in accordance with the provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005(for brevity “the Act”). 2. At the hearing today, the appellant has brought to our notice order dated 20.8.2010 passed by the Appellate Authority granting permission to supply the documents to the appellant. According to the learned counsel, he L.P.A. No. 767 of 2011 (O&M) -2- was not aggrieved any more from the order dated 17.3.201 (Annexure P-5), as the Appellate Authority, under the Act, has ordered the supply of all the documents applied for by the appellant. 3. In view of the above, we find that error, if any, is apparent on the face of the record and it calls for availing any other remedy in accordance with the law instead of filing of the instant appeal. Accordingly, the appellant is relegated to a remedy in accordance with the law before the learned Single Judge. 4. Appeal stands disposed of. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE May 02, 2011 PARAMJIT