[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.2699 OF 2008 Sunil Pitambar Patil ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.Sandeep S.Salunkhe Advocate for Applicant Mr.H.J.Dedia APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : AUGUST 13, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 13, 2008 DATE : AUGUST 13, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in CR No.44 of 2008 of Madha Police Station, Dist.Solapur. The said case is under Sections 379 and 188 of IPC. 3. The prosecution case is that applicant had removed 94 brass of crushed stones, however, the learned APP has admitted that spot panchnama shows that 94 brass of crushed stones were found on the spot. The only thing is that instead of stones [-2-] being in one heap, they were found in four different heaps at the spot. The total weight of 4 heaps was 94 brass. The learned APP has admitted that the spot panchnama shows that no stones were missing from the spot. Looking to the above facts, in my opinion, the custody of the applicant would not be necessary, hence, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. 4. In the event of arrest, the applicant-Sunil Pitambar Patil be released on bail in the sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rs. forty thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant shall report to Madha Police Station, twice in a week till filing of the charge sheet and thereafter once in a month till conclusion of the trial. 5. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]