IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.36914-M of 2009 Date of Decision:1.9.2010 Vijay Kuamr and others .... Petitioners Versus The State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: None for petitioners No.1 to 4. Mr. P.K. Gupta, Advocate for petitioners No.5 and 6. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing of FIR No.36 dated 30.4.2007 registered under Sections 323,427,506,148,149 IPC and under Section 3 & 4 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 at Police Station Nangal District Ropar. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from HC Sardara Singh states that the cancellation report was prepared and submitted before the Court. However, the same was not accepted and sent for further investigation vide order dated 1.2.2008. Thus, the same is still pending. In view of the fact that parallel proceedings are pending before the trial Court, the present petition is rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such. However, in case the petitioners are aggrieved with any order passed by the trial Court, they are at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law. 1.9.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE