IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2008 / 23RD PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 8534 of 2008(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ PRASANNA KUMARI, W/O VIJAYAN, KESAVA SADANAM, MARAYOOR, RESIDING AT ARASSERIL HOUSE, PUTHUPPALLY VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.I.ABDUL SALAM RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DEVIKULAM. 3. TAHASILDAR, DEVIKULAM, 4. VILLAGE OFFICER, MARAYOOR. 5. MADHAVAN, MAMTHOPPILL HOUSE, MANNARAPETTY, MARAYOOR, DEVIKULAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT. R1 TO 4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 8534 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: MARCH 13, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner complains of inaction on Exts.P3 and P4. According to him, a portion of the property covered by Ext.P1 has been subsequently assigned to the 5th respondent without notice or other intimation to the petitioner. It is complaining of this that the aforesaid representations have been made. 2. If, as stated by the petitioner, Exts.P3 and P4 representations have been received by the 2nd respondent, the 2nd respondent shall take note of the complaints made by the petitioner and hold an enquiry into the allegations with notice to the 5th respondent. It is directed that action on Exts.P3 and P4 shall be expedited and completed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-