:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1351 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1351 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1351 OF 2003 IN IN IN SUIT NO. 979 OF 2003 SUIT NO. 979 OF 2003 SUIT NO. 979 OF 2003 Tata Motors Ltd formerly known as Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co.Ltd .....Plffs. Plffs. Plffs. vs. Tiwary Bechar and Co.Ltd and ors. .....Defnds. Defnds. Defnds. Avinash Joshi i/b. Mulla and Mulla for the plaintiffs. V.R. Dhond a/w. Narayan i/b.S.K. Srivastav & co. for the defendants. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 6th October, 2005. P.C. :. 1. Learned advocate appearing for the defendant states that he has already filed affidavit in reply and has stated that they are not using the word mark ‘Tata’ inrelation to their business nor using any stationery having the mark of the plaintiff being ‘Tata’. In that view of the matter, learned :2: counsel for the plaintiff states that he does not press the motion. Motion disposed off accordingly. No order as to costs. sd/- *********