IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.378 of 2011 Baiju Sharma Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 4. 13.7.2011. Mr. Surendra Mishra for the petitioner and Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, Junior Counsel to Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh for the opposite parties are present. By order dated 21.4.2010 passed in C.W.J.C.No.8751 of 2005, the writ petition was allowed and the orders of refixation and recovery were set aside with a direction to the respondents to remit the withheld amount. Although this part of the order was complied by the opposite parties but they did not refix the pension and gratuity of the petitioner on the basis of last salary drawn as a consequence of the setting aside of the refixation order. It is in these circumstances that the respondents had prayed for time to carry out the directions. A supplementary show cause has been filed today on behalf of the opposite parties and in paragraph nos.4 and 5 thereof, it has been stated that the difference of arrears of pension, gratuity and leave encashment have been paid to the petitioner through the cheques mentioned in the said paragraph. It is further stated that the 2 recovered amount of Rs.1,38,295/- has also been received by the petitioner. It is further stated that the pension of the petitioner has been refixed on the basis of the last salary drawn. In view of the statement made in the show cause, nothing survives in the contempt application and the same is accordingly disposed of. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)