FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. COMPANY APPLICATION NO.545 OF 2007 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.888 OF 2003 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Prothonotary’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Mr.Ajay Fernandes i/b M/s.Bilawala & Co. for the applicant. Ms.K.V.Gautam Dy.O.L. present. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 23RD AUGUST, 2007 DATED: 23RD AUGUST, 2007 DATED: 23RD AUGUST, 2007 P.C.: . Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant fairly stated that since the Official Liquidator is provisionally appointed he does not press prayer clause (a). Insofar as prayer (b) is concerned, this is formal prayer made by the applicant for leave under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 to continue with the proceedings filed before the Small Causes Court against the company in liquidation and its Director. There is no reason why the leave of the Court as prayed should not be granted. The company application is, accordingly, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)