( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3136 OF 1991 Nathuji Tulshiram Bardanwale and others. PETITIONERS VERSUS Patanlal Ramgopal Agrawal RESPONDENT ..... Mr. L.V. Sangit, advocate holding for Mr. V.J. Dixit, Senior Counsel, for the petitioners. Mr. M.N. Nawandar, advocate for the respondent. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 9th March, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Mr. M.N. Nawandar, advocate for the respondent, states that the petitioners delivered possession of the premises due to settlement of the dispute outside the Court. 2. Mr. Sangit, advocate holding for Mr. V.J. Dixit, Senior Counsel, states that the petitioners’ legal ( 2 ) representatives did not respond to him so as to verify about such development. He has no instructions. Hence, the petition is dismissed. No costs. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/wp3136-91