IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 272 of 2010 in CRA No. 20 SB of 2010 Date of decision: 04.03.2010 Sunil ........applicant/appellant Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr.Ajay Ksaushik, Advocate for the applicant/appellant Mr. Sanjeev Sura, Additional A.G., Haryana, for the respondent- State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) It is stated by the learned counsel for the applicant that the conviction is under Section 308, 354 of Indian Penal code for a period of four years. The applicant/appellant is in custody for the last two years, seven months and 20 days. The main appeal is not likely to be heard in the near future. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM, Hisar. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge March 04, 2010 mohan