IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR /"" WRIT PETITION N0. 4 / N' OF 2003 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA^ P.1 t: PETITIONERS ^^^••',. ^¥^-'"' ..•^^r .^y^" t.^-'""..- <sv^- A>° ^ Jc\ ^'.- 1. Puran Lal Jangde., S/o. Shri Bh^duram, aged about 65 years, [.L.A and Ex. Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Adbhar, Tahsil Malkharauda District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). 2. Bhupal Patel, S/o. Sri Gangaram Patel Aged about 54 years 3. Padumlal Karsh, S/o. Sri Ramprasad, Aged about 54 years 4. Ratan Lal Sahu, S/o. Sri Shivprasad Sahu, Aged about 63 years / 5. Bodhram Yadav, S/o. Sri Santram Panch, (now Parshad, Nagar Panchayat) Gram Panchayat Adbhar 6. Ramprasad, S/o. Sri Budgaram Aged about 46 years., Panch (now Parshad, Nagar Panchayat) Gram Panchayat Adbhar 7. Radheshyam, S/o. Sri Selan Aged about 36 years, Panch (now Parshad, Nagar Panchayat) Gram Panchayat Adbhar 8. Dilip Kumar Patel S/o. Madheo Patel, Upsarpanch, Gram Panchayat (now Parshad, Nagar Panchayat) Adbhar RESPONDENTS 9. Gorelal, S^. Shridhan aged about 45 years 10. Puniram, S/o. Bodhiram, aged about 50 years, 11. Bhola Shanker S/6. Vijai Shanker aged about.^5 years All residents ofVillage Adbhar, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Janjgir-Champa (C.Gj. VERSUS 1. StateofChhattisgarh Acting through - Principal Secretary, Department of Environment and Urban Development, Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.). ^r 2: Principal Secretary, Department ofPanchayat and Rural Development, Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) 3. Collector Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). 4. Chainsingh Samle S/o. Sri Anand Ram, M.L.A. Malkharauda Constituency R/o. Village Adbhar, Tahsil Malkharauda DistricHanjgir-Champa (C.G.). 5. Ramlakhan Katakwar, S/o. Sri Dhani Ram, Aged about 37 years^" Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Adbhar, (now President, Nagar Panchayat) Tahsil Malkharauda, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). Bhagwat Pramod Chandra S/o. Not known, aged about 43 years Ex-Secretary, Gram Panchayat Adbhar Tahsil Malkharauda, District Janjgir- Champa(C.G.). ^Ss^^< WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF mDIA IFOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITAVRITS, ORDER/ORDERS AND/OR DIRECTION/ DIRECTIONS.CP-Z;^ *i 1*101 ^^rq? ^•cq -qiqioq, yTT|^41<i, Rc^l^^ M:L^!.7..^./.?J.. 3TI^^T<PT^Jcb .P1T3IT^$Trf>^i<b 3n^?Tq^P(^c|ij<s|<y) ^200 ?^ITSR;?rf8?T3TT^$T DIVJSJON BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI A.K. PATNAIKj & HON'BLE SHR1 S.K. AGNIHOTRI. J. 28/09/2005: - We have heard Mr. M. petitioners and perused th©ave|-ments woll as tho ro(jef ©oughtherein. !n our vjew the complaii writ petition shoutd be filed such as Lokayuktei as th©y Moreover, we are not quite been fsled bona fide in the publ of She parties arrayed as petiti< strong suspicion that the petiti< purposes. For the aforesaid reasorts, this petition as PIL. tt will, petitioners to redress their Indi^ non-payment of the pension individual writ petition. Securfty have not entertained this PIL. Sd/- Chief Justice (pi<iIw<Tl^i *ii^oV^ff^& ^RI^I^ ^3T(^T3D^?T CJ ; Sinha learned counsel for the made in the writ pQtition as fts made by the petitioners in the be^re the other appropriate Forums; ilate to corruption in public Jife. su|re as to whether this petition has |c interest. Considering the nature tnsrs and respond©nts,we have a }n may have been filed for political >, we are not Inclined to ©ntertain towever, be open for any of the idual grievances wrth regard to the or any other dues by separate amount be refunded, since we Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge / SP/FS/2005-20,000 ^ R^ ^