1 ABA-31.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.31 OF 2011 Pravin Balkrushna Patil .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents Shri Rohan Sonawane for the Applicant. Shri Y.M. Nakhawa, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: FEBRUARY 21, 2011 P.C: 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail a Director of a Corporation which is registered in Nagpur and had duped people in the Konkan area. The offence which is registered is in respect of misappropriation of Rs.1,04,000/-. The learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant is not at all involved in the misappropriation of any amount, but in order to show his bona fides, he would deposit Rs.10,000/- as he is one of the Directors of the Corporation. It is not clear as to why the applicant s custodial interrogation is required. In view of this, in 2 ABA-31.11 the event of his arrest in C.R. No.47 of 2008, registered with Devrukh Police Station, Taluka Guhagar, Ratnagiri, the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.25,000/- on the following conditions: i) The applicant shall deposit an amount of Rs.10,000/- within a period of two weeks from today before the learned trial Court which amount the learned trial Court shall invest in any nationalized Bank to earn maximum interest and shall deal with the same at the end of the trial as per the result of the case. ii) If the applicant fails to deposit the afore-stated amount within the stipulated period, this order shall stand revoked. iii) The applicant shall attend the office of the CID, Pune on 28-2-2011 at 10:00 a.m. for interrogation and thereafter as and when required by the I.O.. iv) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts 3 ABA-31.11 of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. v) The applicant shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the trial Court. 2. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicant may furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 3. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)