IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1482 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: October 12, 2009. Satish Kumar ...Petitioner(s) v. Jaspal Singh & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri Nakul Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The grievance of the petitioner before this court is that despite the directions issued by this Court dated 6.2.2009, respondent No.1 has failed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. As per the averments made in this petition, the entries in his favour were changed by the respondents maliciously and the same were detected in an inquiry. Farad Badar was also prepared but no action was taken against the revenue staff for their fraudulent action and, thus, the respondents are guilty of committing the contempt of this court. Admittedly, the civil suit is pending between the parties with regard to their rights in the land in dispute. The scope of Farad Badar is to make correction in the revenue record. Moreover, a specific statutory remedy for making correction in the revenue record is available under the provisions of the Punjab Land Revenue Act. Thus, I am not inclined to take cognizance of this petition at this stage. Dismissed. October 12, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge