IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERAAD Wednesday, the 15th day of June, 2011 Present: Hon’ble Sri Justice N. Ravi Shankar Crl.R.C.No. 1262 of 2011 Between: Burra Suresh and others …Petitioner and The State of AP …Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRL.R.C..No. 1262 of 2011 Judgment Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The impugned order of the trial court by which it recalled the witnesses would show that the witnesses who were recalled are the wife and her parents, who are crucial witnesses in the case. Having regard to the fact that offences alleged are punishable under section 498-A IPC and Ss. 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the trial court in its discretion has given its reasons and ordered recall of the witnesses at the instance of the Assistant Public Prosecutor, as the case is a police case. 3. The leaned counsel for the petitioners/accused raised various contentions and it is seen that the trial court mentioned about the same in the impugned order. It has also observed that the prosecution evidence is not yet closed in the matter and therefore recalling the witnesses would serve the ends of justice notwithstanding with their earlier absence. In my opinion the discretion exercised by the trial court cannot be said to be illegal or perverse. 4. Accordingly this petition is dismissed at the admission stage. _____________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J. June 15, 2011. *BVS