IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 7TH ASWINA 1932 RFA.No. 413 of 2009(F) -------------------------------- [IA.NO.1694/74 IN OS.NO.41/1970 OF SUB COURT, TIRUR] .................... APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 34 AND 35: ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. KODALIL HAMZAKUTTY HAJI,S/O.HYDRU, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLILLSERI, TIRUR TALUK,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. HYDRU,S/O.HAMZAKKUTTY HAJI, KODALI HOUSE,VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. BY ADVS. SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN, SRI.S.SREEDEV. RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 33 AND 36 TO 46: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THADATHIL AHAMMED @ KASMI, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM,CHERUVANNOOR DESOM, TIRUR TALUK,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THADATHIL KUNJIPATHUMMA. 3. IYYACHAKUTTY UMMA, REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN PARAMBATHU ENIKUTTY, VILAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 4. IBRAYIM, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 5. AYISHA BEEVI UMMA, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 6. ISMAYIL, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. R.F.A. NO.413/2009-F: 7. ISSAQU, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 8. PATHUMMAKUTTY UMMA, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 9. AASSAN, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 10. NABEESA UMMA, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 11. VIRALIKUTTY, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 12. AHAMMEDKUTTY HAJI, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 13. MUHAMMED, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 14. VELAYI, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 15. VEERANKUTTY KURIKKAL, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 16. SAIDHALI, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 17. MUHAMMEDKUTTY, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 18. HASSAN, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 19. VEERANKUTTY, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 20. MARIYUMMA, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 21. BEEVI UMMA, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 22. VEERANKUTTY, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 23. AALIKUTTY, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 24. ABUBACKER, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. R.F.A. NO.413/2009-F: 25. MARIYAKUTTY UMMA, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 26. KUNHIPATHUMMA, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 27. KANHEEMA UMMA, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 28. KODALIL HAMSAKUTTY HAJI, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 29. KADHYAMU UMMA, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 30. PATHUKUTTY, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 31. IBRAHIM, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 32. SUBAIDA, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 33. NAFEESA, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 34. MUHAMMED HANEEFA, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 35. SULAIKHA, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 36. PARAMBATH MUHAMMED, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 37. HAMZAKUTTY HAJI, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 38. HAIDRU, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 39. SAIDALIKUTTY, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 40. MUHAMMED ASHRAF, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 41. MINNATH MOL, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 42. ABDUL LATHEEF, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. R.F.A. NO.413/2009-F: 43. MUSTHAFA, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. 44. AYAMMA UMMA, VALAVANNOOR AMSOM DESOM,PULLISSERI. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.HARISH R. MENON, SRI.K.T.SHYAMKUMAR. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.F.A. No. 413 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 29th day of September, 2010. JUDGMENT Bhavadasan, J, It is unnecessary to go into the details of the appeal for the simple reason that it can be disposed of on the basis of the compromise entered into between the contesting parties. 2. The appellants and the contesting respondents have filed a compromise petition, which they pray may be accepted and necessary modifications may be brought about in the final decree passed by the court below. 3. On gong through the compromise petition, it is seen that the parties have agreed to have a particular mode of allocation of property shown as item No.3, which is taken in by clause 1(a) of the final decree passed by the court below. Accepting the compromise, clause 1(a) of the final decree passed by the court below, which is under challenge, stands modified as follows: R.F.A.413/2009.. 2 The plaintiff has agreed for allotment of 35 cents of land in item No.3 instead of 40 cents of land allotted in the final decree. The appellants have also agreed to the same and they have agreed for allotting 35 cents of land in item No.3 in favour of the first respondent/plaintiff. The Commissioner shall identify and set part 35 cents of land with equal measurements on four sides in north-eastern portion of item No.3 to be allotted to the first respondent as per clause 1(a) in the impugned final decree. 4. The matter shall go back to the trial court for locating the property agreed upon by the parties in terms of the above compromise. The compromise shall form part of the decree. Parties shall appear before the lower appellate court on 20.10.2010. Records shall be returned to the court below, if received. R.F.A.413/2009.. 3 We also express our appreciation for the commendable work done by the Mediator in brining about a conciliation between the parties. Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Judge P. Bhavadasan, Judge sb.