IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2009 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(Crl.).No. 443 of 2008(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.VIJAYAN, MAROTTIMOOTTIL HOUSE, NANGIARKULANGARA.P.O, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS SRI.T.PRADEEP KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KAMALAN, CHETTITHUNDIL HOUSE, AKOMKUDY, NANGIARKULANGARA.P.O, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. GREESHMA.M.K, D/O.KAMALAN, CHETTITHUNDIL HOUSE, AKOMKUDY, NANGIARKULANGARA.P.O, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, ALAPPUZHA. 4. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HARIPAD, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 5. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HARIPAD, POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.\ ADDL.R6. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLILCE, CRIME BRANCH, ALAPPUZHA ADDL.R7. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, TRIVANDRUM. SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 6 AND 7 VIDE ORDER DATED 27/2/2009 IN WP(CRL)443/2008. ADV. SRI.P.N.APPUKUTTAN FOR R1-2 SRI.M.R.ANISON GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.U.NAZAR. ADV.SMT.BINDU SREEKUMAR - MEDIATOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: A. K. Basheer & P. Bhavadasan, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP (Crl.) No. 443 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 6th day of April, 2009. Judgment Basheer, J: Mr.Vysakh, the alleged detenu appears along with Ms.Greeshma, the daughter of respondent No.1. Parents of Mr.Vysakh and Ms.Greeshma are also present . We have interacted with the parties. 2. Mr. Vysakh states before us that he had married Ms.Greeshma at Kavarat Mahadevar temple at Dhanappady, Harippad in Alappuzha district on November 22, 2008 and that both of them have been living together as husband and wife eversince. We are further informed that Ms. Greeshma is pregnant for about 14 weeks. The parents of Ms.Greeshma have no objection with regard to the relationship between Vysakh and Greeshma. However the parents of Mr.Vysakh are not in favour of the said alliance. 3. From our interaction with the boy and the girl, we are satisfied that both of them are mature enough to take a well informed decision about their future. Mr.Vysakh is a diploma holder in civil engineering. Till recently he had been working in Indore. He informs us that now he has been offered a job in “Samagravikasana”, a Project under the Government of Kerala. He proposes to join there shortly. Ms.Greeshma is a Medical Transcriptionist. She states that she has been promised an appropriate posting in the institution where she had been working earlier. We have referred to the above aspect only to indicate that both the boy and the girl appear to be confident about their career and future life. Further, Mr.Vysakh asserted before us that he is not under any kind of restraint or detention as alleged by the petitioner, his father. 4. In the above facts and circumstances no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. The Writ Petition is closed. A.K. BASHEER Judge P. Bhavadasan an. Judge