1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CAO NO. 207 OF 2010 IN MCA (Review) ST. NO. 20439/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3464 OF 2007 (Shri Sharad Wamanrao Rohankar vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.B. VARALE, JJ. APRIL 23, 2010. Heard Shri Futane, learned counsel for the applicant. Civil Application is for condonation of delay of 342 days in filing above mentioned MCA Stamp number. By that MCA, review of order dated 11.12.2008 dismissing writ petition No. 3464 of 2007 in motion hearing is sought. The petition has been dismissed after noticing that the petitioner approached this Court after expiry of period of limitation for filing of Civil Suit. Shri Futane, learned counsel for the applicant has urged that the letter dated 20.10.2006 written by the Collector, Amravati, to Chief Officer, Municipal Council constituting a cause of action and approach is within limitation from said date. The perusal of said communication shows that it is addressed to the employer of the petitioner and the employer of the petitioner has not accepted any liability as sought to be urged. In any case, the claim is 2 for arrears of salary for the period from 1994 to 1998. In this situation, we do not find anything wrong with the order passed by this Court on 11.12.1998. As we have examined the review application on merit and found no substance in it, we also reject the application for condonation of delay. In the circumstances, both the applications are disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.