IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.2898 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:14.09.2011 Ichcha Ram ....Appellant Versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate for the appellant. RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL) Land-owner has filed the instant appeal challenging award dated 01.10.2009 passed by Reference Court Faridabad, determining the market value of the acquired land. In this appeal, the appellant is claiming further enhancement of compensation payable to him. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has informed this Court that RFA No.541 of 2010 (O&M) titled as Maya and others vs. State of Haryana and other connected appeals which had arisen out of the same acquisition proceedings and the same award of the Reference Court dated 01.10.2009 as in the instant case, have already been decided by this Court on 11.05.2011 and in view of the aforesaid judgment, this appeal is also liable to be dismissed. Ordered accordingly. Since the appeal has been dismissed on merits, the applications for condonation of delay of 268 days in filing as well as 70 days in re-filing this appeal do not survive. September 14, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE