CRM No. M 22342 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 22342 of 2009 Date of decision: 15.12.2009 Sukhdev Singh and others ........ petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Preetinder S Ahluwalia, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Anupinder Singh Grewal, additional Advocate General, Pb for the respondent - State Ms Anju Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 2 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition at this stage but prays for liberty to take the pleas before the trial Court. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, learned counsel for petitioners at this stage prays that the personal appearance of petitioner No. 3 be exempted. CRM No. M 22342 of 2009 2 Learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 states that she has no objection if the aforesaid prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners is allowed. In view of the above, the personal appearance of petitioner No. 3 is exempted till such time, the petitioner is required to be present in court in accordance with the law. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge December 15, 2009 mohan