nraa‘m Wm m mmrm, fawragrr g WW g W. v. atmjw? awn 3 gamma ’W W mW‘aiwa‘T W. g, 'mr/ mar yam. fyaaaw mm fawn am a WT fawmrr g E. 11.3 Em“? mi .0... /§¥%;§m.3, 1- mfam rm 1%: 3m) W rm mg 1+8 Hm. 2— rmam Ea? a??? ezrfm m fifa sirg us aé, —f‘axim" ' mouwmmfxiar u-%% fm’a‘mo mfammfh‘w /, 3mg t3 mi WWWWWTWW ‘f‘n'x'a', mfr kraw‘? 3m: arf‘dwr, mm" amnaaafm affa'mgt wt mar g 5.31.3 mwm‘t—m _——“———.—— awaamm n mu" 2 am- u,.. 5w W m mf 3m armmmf / # w‘g mi gm nrfhw,%m“t $WT araa‘r aw gagu‘grurm‘ @Kgvm" war ,fhmT mmT 3 gang (7 / 6-,- ?fra mf 3m) WWE’T mf :im27tm5 W;%§T%a?fama‘1 :«Tazi mngsaam um wmr WT am g {wag -2... A @gw f \f §4§ “3%. WE? magma m?§.£m§ E34 gaa mwag; $43 gumua n4§ .wWaJmaamnqam gm $3 mamm? §ma mmmAa n34 w$§§.§§4 m§$.§.w§ \mwE £23g .wmmOS w. qjea “Ea wwxwwam ~wwmwxwoo: w ig max. .Ul..l. ‘III'Illlu'InlA.|:"‘I-:)‘.|4IIII"I p343maaxMmobaonoo wgw. "tv'lln‘l-g".llixl Ini'lntlllzl-l.lu.' 'l‘uilll-iuv' M 3. The Tribunal, aiier considering the issues framed by it, awarded a compensation of Rs. 2,00,000/- to the claimants along with interest @ 10 percent per annum from the date of application, 4. I have heard the counsel appearing for the appellant and perused the records of the tribunal and also the hndings given in the impugned award. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that policy was not filed by the either party. But horn the perusal of record I found that incident'is dated 19.03.1999 and the deposit challan of Rs. 3159/- which was issued for insuring the Truck bearing registration No. ¢ USY—3275, filed by the owner of the vehicle shows that the insurance was eh‘ective with effect from 17.03.1999 to 16.03.2000. 6. He further submits that the Development Omcer issuing the said challan has been suspended subsequently. However, subsequent suspension of the officer issuing the said challan would not aEect the charging of amount and giving a note regarding deposit challan and eEective insurance. 7. Same view has been taken by the Division Bench of this Court in case of National India Insurance Company Limited v. Bhandari & others (MA No. 296 of 2001, decided on 19.01.201 1). No other points have been raised by the counsel for the appellant. 9. On the basis of above discussion, the instant appeal has not force, the same deserves to be and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. Sd/— N. K. AgarWal Judge Sahu