IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 583 OF 2008 Janagonda Rayagonda Patil through C.A.holder Aigonda Janagonda Patil..... ..... ...Appellant V/s Bapu @ Balasaheb Kallappa Naradekar & Anr. .... ...Respondents. Adv. for the appellants. Adv. for the respondent. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 13th FEBRUARY, 2009. PC: Admit on following substantial question of law: (1)Whether the appellant executed power of attorney in favour of respondent No.1 with a view to authorize him to execute sale deed in favour of respondent No.2 his own son or whether power of attorney was executed in favour of respondent No.1 with a view to defend a civil suit No.406/87? (2)Whether First Appellate Court is justified in reversing the findings and decision rendered by the trial Court in the facts of the present case? 13.2.2009. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1464 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 583 OF 2008 Janagonda Rayagonda Patil through C.A.holder Aigonda Janagonda Patil..... ..... ...Applicant V/s Bapu @ Balasaheb Kallappa Naradekar & Anr. .... ...Respondents. Mr.Umesh Mankapure, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.V.S.Lonkar, Adv. for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 13th FEBRUARY, 2009. PC: By an interim order respondents are directed not to create any third party interest in the suit property acting on the basis of the sale deed executed by respondent No.1 in favour of respondent No.2 till the decision of the Appeal. 13.2.09