: 1 : SD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1084 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO.1084 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO.1084 OF 2009 Shamrao Vishnu Pawar ... Petitioner V/s. Nandram Vishnu Pawar & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.Dilip Bodake for the Petitioner. Ms.Anjali Uthale for Respondent No.1. Ms.S.S. Bhende, AGP, for Respondent Nos.2 to 4. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE : 27TH APRIL, 2009. DATE : 27TH APRIL, 2009. DATE : 27TH APRIL, 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order passed on 29th March, 2008. According to the petitioner, this order was passed without affording him a personal hearing and therefore the order is required to be set aside. 2. The learned AGP appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4 submits, on instructions, very fairly that no hearing was afforded to the petitioner or the respondent No.1 either. In the facts and circumstances, I am of the opinion that the order impugned must be set aside and the revision ought to be remanded to the Revisional Authority. : 2 : 3. The Petition is allowed. The impugned order passed on 29th March, 2008 is set aside. The parties will appear before the State Government, which is the Revisional Authority, after being issued notice by the Revisional Authority. The Revisional Authority shall issue notice to both the petitioner and the respondent No.1 for remaining present at the time of hearing of the revision. 4. The Petition is disposed of. .....