IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 24.09.2010 C.R.No.6204 of 2010 (O&M) Ram Chander and others ...Petitioners Versus Mai Lal and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Ajit Sihag, Advocate, for the petitioners. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The defendants are in revision aggrieved against an order passed by the learned trial Court on 14.06.2010, whereby the plaintiff- respondents have been permitted to amend the plaint so as to incorporate the prayer regarding restraint order against the defendants from obstructing them from using the rasta in question. Since the learned trial Court has allowed the amendment in the plaint so as to incorporate the additional relief, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the order passed, which may warrant any interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Dismissed. 24.09.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE