,{^- '» iteSisy'* s r'Esp''- jj i \.'" ^/ <^^-..^%^' i^ COURT OF CHHATTSSOARH: BiLASPUi itPetrtion S'i joHQoanaGur ^inon ^nounan, Asslstant Teacher, S/o. Shri Ratipa! Singh Chouhan, aged about years, •iv rif>?.t&d ??t Prirrs?sr^/ ^rih^r's! ^f'v'fK.W^, .Wiu > . ft i,.^.., ^ i.r^i tw-v. chandragiri Block Dharbha, Dist. Basiar (CG). Stats of Chhattisciarh, througi the C-^j^ !!tft^f[i,*iin f^.* &UU?w£2UVU i^f"t Secretar iViantraiaya, Raipur, Dist. Raipur (CG). 2. The Asst. Commissioner. Tnbal Weifare Departmsnt, Ja The Biock Education Distt. Bastar (CG). ;da!pur. icer, Barbha, under Aracie 226/227 of the Constttution of india.) 'bie Sflr. Satssh K. Agniho'tri, J. Pressnt! Shri Pr^fuli Bhsrst. couns^l for ths- D$titlon9r. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 14'" day "f August, 2008) Learned counsei appearing for the respondents/State submits that the resoondent authorities mav be aranted iiberty to consider the mistakes committed bv fhem. He further submits that thev wili consider the case of the ,oetitloner in the iight of iudfiments and orders oassed by the Hon'bie Suoreme Q0ijr[ |n ?i^g nistter of S^hib •Rsm Vs, St^t8 of Hafvaiis a[nd oth^ra, P. Tuisidar and others v. Government of A.P. and others^ and bv thls Court I" Vidyadhar Tiv/ari Vs. State of Chhattjsgarh & othsrs'1. 2) Accordingty, rsspondents/State are granted tiberty to conslder and pass the order in accordance v/ith iav/ as stated in the above iudarnents and orders ' 1995 Supp (!) SCC 20 'AiR2003SC43 32006a)MPHT105(Cffl. Sl, "r j '•^. "•! '*<3'n^./"< y.^h.-^-^*^;^ "V, passed by the Supreme Court as weil as this High Court, within a Deriod ot" eight weeks. No recovery shaii be made tili ihe disposa! of the representations. 3) view ofthe foregoing, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnibotri Judge E