IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2011 / 22ND ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 14807 of 2011(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- CHANDRAKUMAR, CHANITHNI TC 13/686,VAZATHACAUD VANCHIYOOR, TRIVANDRUM BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SARIN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUSEUM, TRIVANDRUM 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUSEUM POLICE STATION, TRIVANDRUM 3. BIBIN CHAND, S/O.CHANDRAKUMAR, T.C.79/1043,VAYAIL VEEDU THOLIKODE VILLAGE, TRIVANDRAUM 4. DEEPTHI,S/O.BIBINCHAND, T.C.79/1043,VAYAIL VEEDU THOLIKODE VILLAGE, TRIVANDRUM ADV. SRI.V.SADASIVAN FOR R3&4 SMT.SREEDEVI KYLASANATH FOR R3&4 SMT.SHALEENA RAJAN FOR R3&4 SMT.C.M.CHARISHMA, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: dmb WP(C).No. 14807 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE COMPLAINT GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE COMPLAINT GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE dmb PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.14807 OF 2011 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT PIUS C. KURIAKOSE ,J. This is a case where a father seeks protection for his life and property from his own son and daughter-in-law. According to the petitioner, respondents 3 and 4, the son and daughter-in- law who had got married under the Special Marriage Act against his wishes are now creating all sorts of trouble for his peaceful life in his own house Chanithni, TC13/686, Vazathacaud Vanchiyoor, Trivandrum. According to him, respondents 3 and 4 are coming over to the house and disturbing him. He states there is real threat to his life and peaceful residence in the building which belongs to him only. He has a further allegation that a Bajaj CT100 bike belonging to him is going to forcefully taken away by respondents 3 and 4. 2. Smt.Sreedevi Kailasnath, the learned counsel for respondents 3 and 4 submitted that respondents 3 and 4 have W.P.(C)No.14807 OF 2011 2 absolutely no intention to disturb the petitioner's residence in his house bearing No.TC 13/686. They have also no intention to take away the bike in question. We record the submission of Smt.Sreedevi Kailasnath and dispose of this writ petition accordingly. We permit the petitioner to approach the police in case any threat arises from the side of respondents 3 and 4 in future notwithstanding the assurance given to this court by respondents 3 and 4 through their counsel. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE. C.K.ABDUL REHIM JUDGE dmb