IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 23309 of 2005 Between: 1 Korvani Ramulu, S/o.K.Narayana, R/o.Chitkul Village, Patancheru Mandal, Medak district. 2 Korvani Venkatesh,, S/o.Late Mallaiah, R/o.Chitkul Village, Patancheru Mandal, Medak district. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Principal Secretary to Government of A.P., Revenue Department , Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Medak district. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Medak District Patancheru. 4 The Station House Officer, Patancheru Police Station, Medak district, Patancheru. 5 The Superintendent of Police, Medak district at Patancheru. 6 The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Ramachandrapuram, Medak district, Ramachandrapuram. 7 The Inspector General of Police, PCR Cell, CBCID, Directorate General of Police, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad. 8 Racharla Badrivishal, S/o.Late Rajaiah, R/o.H.No.4-30, Patancheru Town, Medak district. 9 Racharla Anand Kumar, S/o. R/o.Patancheru Town, Medak district, Patancheru Town. 10 Smt.Racharla Sujata, W/o.Gyaneshwar, R/o.H.No.12-35, Patancheru, Medak district, Patancheru Town. 11 Kirthi Rukmbai, W/o.Kondaiah, R/o.Secunderabad, Hyderabad district, through Sri Racharla - Gyaneshwar, S/o.Late Rajaiah, H.No.12-35, Patancheru, Medak district, Patancheru Town. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No.2 and 3 in not issuing timely instructions to the respondent No.4 and the highhanded action on the part of the respondent No.4 in not arresting the respondents No.8 to 11 and their men whose description is given in the complaint dt.22-10-2005 as being discriminatory, arbitrary, illegal, violative of the P.O.T.Act, amounts to infringement of the right to life of the petitioners as enshrined in Articles 14,15,16,17,19,21 and 46 of the Constitution of India and apart from violative of the provisions of the P.O.T.Act 1977 and the S.C. and S.T. ( P.O.A) Act 1989 and consequently declare that all transactions said to have been made or done by the respondents No.8 to 11 pertaining to the lands situated in Sy.nos.327 ( Ac.9- 12gts); 328/29Ac2-28gts); 329/8 (Ac3-00gts) and 329/469 Ac.10- 38gts) of Chitkul Village' patancheru Mandal, Medak district as being void, fabricated and fraud and award costs for the hardships sustained by the petitioners and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.S.TULASI DAS Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive. Accordingly, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ (G. ROHINI, J) 03rd February, 2009. Tsy To 1 The Principal Secretary to Government of A.P., Revenue Department , Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Medak district. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Medak District Patancheru. 4 The Station House Officer, Patancheru Police Station, Medak district, Patancheru. 5 The Superintendent of Police, Medak district at Patancheru. 6 The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Ramachandrapuram, Medak district, Ramachandrapuram. 7 The Inspector General of Police, PCR Cell, CBCID, Directorate General of Police, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad. 8 Two CCs 9 Two CD copies