IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 10TH AUGUST 2010 / 19TH SRAVANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 4687 of 2010() ----------------------------- CRMP.2039/2010 of DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, ALAPPUZHA. .................... (CRIME NO.676 OF 2010 OF ALAPPUZHA NORTH POLICE STATION) PETITIONER (S): ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 4 AND 6 TO 12: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. JOHN, PALIATHIAL, KANJIRAM CHIRA WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 2. SARATH, THAIPARAMBIL, KANJIRAM CHIRA WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 3. UNNI, KODIVEEDU, KANJIRAM CHIRA WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 4. UNNI,BANGLAVUPARAMBIL, KANJIRAM CHIRA WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 5. JIJO, PULICKAL, KANJIRAM CHIRA WARD ALAPPUZHA. 6. VINU, KODIVEEDU, KANJIRAM CHIRA WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 7. MANU, VALAYIL, KANJIRAM CHIRA WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 8. RATHEESH @ KUTTI,KODIVEEDUPURAYIDAM, KANJIRAM CHIRA WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 9. LALU, ARACKAL, KANJIRAM CHIRA WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 10. SHIJO, KODIVEEDU PURAYIDOM, KANJIRAM CHIRA WARD, ALAPPUZHA. Kss ..2/- ...2.... B.A.NO.4687/2010 11. NELSON, PUNNACKAL, KANJIRAM CHIRA WARD ALAPPUZHA. BY ADVS. SRI.GEORGE SEBASTIAN, SRI.JAYAN C. DAS RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. V. TEKCHAND THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/08/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. =============================== Bail Application No. 4687 of 2010 =============================== DATED: 10.08.2010 O R D E R Petitioner, who are accused Nos.1 to 4 in Crime No. 676 of 2010 of Alappuzha Police Station for offences punishable under Secs.143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 506(ii), 447, 323, 324 and 308 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have their application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer on 19.08.10 or on 20.08.10 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioners shall thereafter appear before the Magistrate who on being satisfied that the petitioners have been interrogated by the Police, shall consider and dispose of their application for regular bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed. This petition is disposed of as above. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj