: 1 : SD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.113 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.113 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.113 OF 2005 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL NO.69 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO.69 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO.69 OF 2005 Laxman Santram Powar & Anr. ...Applicants V/s. Jaysing Dattu Powar & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.S.D. Patil, Advocate, for the Applicants. Mr.G.M. Savagave, Advocate, for the Respondents. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATE : 6TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 6TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 6TH FEBRUARY, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates appearing for the parties. 2. The submission of the learned Advocate for the respondents is that ad-interim relief granted on 24th February, 2005 cannot continue as from 19th December, 2004 till 24th February, 2005 there was no ad-interim or interim relief operating in favour of the applicants. 3. Second Appeal has been admitted for final hearing. By the ad-interim order, parties are directed to maintain status-quo with a clarification that even the applicants will not alter the position : 2 : of the property as it existed on 24th February, 2005. 4. In my view, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the ad-interim order deserves to continue. Accordingly, Civil Application is disposed of by directing that ad-interim relief granted in terms of order dated 24th February, 2005 will continue to operate as interim relief till final disposal of the Appeal. 5. Hearing of the Second Appeal is expedited. [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.] [ABHAY S. OKA, J.]