IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 458 OF 2010 M/S. ESMERALDA DEVELOPERS REP.BY ITS PARTNER MR. JAGDISH BHOBE AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus MR. RAMAKANT PARAB AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Valmiki Menezes,advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sahish Mahambrey For Respondent no.2 Mr. Shivan Dessai, advocate for respondent no.4. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 4th February, 2011 P.C: Mr. Mahambrey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2 and Mr. Desai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4 submit that against the impugned order passed by the District Judge, North Goa, Panaji on an application filed under Section 269 of the City of Panaji Corporation Act, 2002, appeal under Section 359 is maintainable and hence the present writ petition is not maintainable. In view of the availability of the alternative remedy under Section 359 of the said Act Mr. Menezes, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail remedy of appeal under Section 359 of the Act. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy as may be available in law. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-