1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3345 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 3345 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 3345 OF 2004 SERENE INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR. PETITIONERS Versus SICOM LTD. .. RESPONDENTS Mr. M. K. Nesari for petitioners Mr. Prakaksh Panjabi for R CORAM:-SMT. RANJANA DESAI & A. S. OKA, JJ. DATED:-14/11/2005 P.C. . The petitioners have challenged the notice dated 16/8/2004 issued under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 ("the said Act" for short). In our opinion, no case is made out for interference with the notice at this stage. The petitioners may at the appropriate time file appeal under Section 17 of the said Act, if they are so advised. We keep all contentions of the petitioners open. Section 19 of 2 the said Act also affords sufficient protection to the petitioners. 2. With the above observations, the petition is dismissed. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI,J.) (A. S. OKA, J.)