1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.6950 OF 2009 Sudhakar s/o Rajandra Khodse ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra And Others. ... Respondents. -------- Shri. R.P. Bhumkar, Advocate for petitioner. Shri. V.H. Dighe, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 4. Shri. P.S. Pawar, Advocate for respondent No.4 -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE: 7th JULY, 2010 PER COURT : 1) Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2 2) The petitioner claims allotment of the plots as beneficiaries. The petitioner has placed on record documents showing entries in the 7/12 extract to the effect that the subject land is reserved for extension of Gaothan. 3) The learned Assistant Government Pleader Shri. Dighe submits that, a civil suit was filed. 4) The petitioner is entitled to file a comprehensive representation to the Collector Beed within four weeks. If such a comprehensive representation is filed, the Collector Beed should dispose of such representation by passing a brief reasoned order within (8) weeks thereafter. 3 5) The writ petition is disposed of. We have not expressed any opinion on merits of the matter. Authenticated copy be given to the Assistant Government Pleader. Sd/- Sd/- (K.K. TATED, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.6950.09