^?iftsvSi?s;;iJ!;?'l^fs;^';^'";l"!:l' sn'W HI6H COlffiT <T CHHATTtSeARH AT BILASPUR W. P.IS) No. 2180 of 2007 Petitioner Versus Bhi^ilat Chwjbey S/o Otnirom Choubey Aged dwut - 55 yews R/o vMvge- Borida, Teh.- <& Distt. Raigarh (C.6.) 1. State of Chhattisgorh Throigh •. Secretary School Education Department &.K.S. Bhawan, Raipu* (c.e.) 2. Oistrict Edueation Officer Raigarfi, Nst: R((t9arh- (C.&.) 3. Block Education Officer Block - Raigar+i District - Raigarh (C.S.) SB; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Present: Mr. Vivek Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Dubey, P<mel La»»yer-fw the State/respondents. OR&ER (Pa^ed on this 10ttl Day of Aprjt, 2007) I. The question of lcn« involved herein csto whether- the petitioner is entitled to regular pcy scale w.e.f. the date of initiol appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel af^ewfiy for the petitioner os well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of low invotved the present writ petition ore the same to that of in W. P. (S) No. 813/2007 (Rom Kumar Sahu and others vs. State ©ovt.of Oihatti^arh & another), which was allowed vide order dated 12.02.2007. 3. In view of the above-stated submissions made by leamedcounsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the scme terms. hto order as to costs. Sd/- Subhosh SatishK.AgnUiorri Judge