CR No.4698 of 2001 : 1 : In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. Date of decision. 13.10.2009 Gurjit Singh Vs. Ranjit Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI Present: Mr.KS Cheema, Advocate. None for the respondent. PERMOD KOHLI, J. (Oral): This revision is directed against the order dated 28.03.2001 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Malerkotla, rejecting the application of the petitioner for extension of time and deposit the balance amount of sale consideration in terms of the decree for specific performance dated 28.05.1994 passed in Civil Suit No.157 of 19.07.1990. The petitioner herein filed a suit for specific performance against the respondent. The suit was decreed vide judgment and decree dated 28.05.1994. It was found that the petitioner had already paid Rs.30,000/- to the respondent herein. At the time of the passing of the decree, the petitioner was directed to deposit the balance sale consideration of Rs.28,00/- in the Court within one month and the defendant was directed to execute the sale deed in favour of the petitioner. Admittedly, the petitioner did not deposit the balance amount as per terms of the decree. Thereafter, the petitioner moved an CR No.4698 of 2001 : 2 : application on 31.03.1997 seeking extension in time for depositing the balance amount of the sale consideration under the decree aforesaid. The sole ground for seeking extension in time was that the petitioner remained ill and due to the defect of his memory, he could not make the deposit within the time. The Court below, however, did not accept this explanation of the petitioner, primarily, on the ground that the application was neither supported by affidavit nor medical evidence regarding illness of the petitioner or regarding loss of memory was produced. This finding of fact is based upon the averments made in the application. No material has been placed on record in support of the application or the contention raised in the present petition. The finding recorded by the Court below cannot be interfered with. For the reasons recorded above, I find no merit in the present revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs. 13.10.2009. (PERMOD KOHLI) BLS JUDGE