IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2011 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 1183 of 2011(S) ----------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT/ORDER IN WPC.32591/2010 DATED 26/10/2010 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------- AMBUJAKSHI, AGED 58, D/O.JANAKI, RESIDING AT PUTHENPURAYIL, OLAKETTIYAMBALAM. P.O., THEKKEKARA, MAVELIKARA-690 510. BY ADV. SRI.R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI, SRI.R.SREEDHARAN NAIR, SMT.SABINA JAYAN, SMT.MINI.V.A.. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 3 AND 5 IN WPC: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. HARIKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 52, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, MAVELIKARA-690 510. 2. VENUNATH, AGED ABOUT 53, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, OFFICE OF THE SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA-688 001. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.M.J. RAJASREE. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/12/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs Con.Case(C).No. 1183 of 2011(S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:- ANNEXURE 1- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 26.10.2010 IN W.P(C)NO.32591 OF 2010 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. ANNEXURE II- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23.12.2010 IN RP.NO.1165 OF 2010 IN W.P.(C)NO.32591/2010 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. ANNEXURE III- TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 16.8.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Contempt Case (C) No. 1183 of 2011 S ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 14th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ This petition has been filed, alleging disobedience of the respondents in Annexure-I judgment, whereby it has been ordered that respondents shall pass orders on the application as per the provisions of the Transfer of Registry Rules. 2. However, learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that it is because of the defect in the title deed of the petitioner that they are unable to pass orders as directed. It is also submitted that if the defect is rectified, necessary orders will be passed. 3. From the submissions made on behalf of the respondents, it is evident that there is no culpable inaction warranting proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act. Contempt Case is closed. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/14/12