IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 624 of 2006 (M/B) Smt. Vandana W/o Sri Vinod Kumar, R/o 1016, Subhash Nagar, Ludhiyana (Punjab). …….. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Secretary, Home Affairs, Dehradun. 2. Director General of Police, Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 3. Senior Superintendent of police, Haridwar. 4. Investigating Officer, P.S. Dalanwala, District Dehradun. ……. Respondents. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.K.Sharma, Government Advocate for the respondents. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.K. Sharma, Government Advocate for the respondents. 2. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, the learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the fact that the police after the completion of the investigation of the case registered on the petitioner’s report has filed charge sheet against one Fakir Chand, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty of working out the other remedies, which may be available to the petitioner under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure including that of filing a criminal complaint against the remaining four persons named in the First Information Report. 3. Permission granted. 4. With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. With the above order, CLMA No. 6372 of 2006 also stands dismissed as withdrawn. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 11.07.2006 11.07.2006 G