IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6377 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: March 04, 2011 Harmel Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Narinder Singh and another .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Y.P. Singla, Advocate for Mr. S.S. Rangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Sabherwal, Advocate for the respondents. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) This petition assails the orders dated 13.8.2007 and 5.6.2008 passed by the courts below whereby the application filed by the respondents under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC was allowed and the parties were directed to maintain status quo regarding possession of the disputed land. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties at length, it appears that both the parties claim themselves to be in possession of the suit property. However, the petitioner apprehends that under the garb of the order of status quo, the defendants may not take forcible possession of the same. However, without deciding as to who is in actual possession of the suit property, which may be decided at the time of conclusion of the trial on merits, the parties are directed to maintain status quo with regard to possession as well as alienation over the suit property. The trial court is directed to decide the case as expeditiously as possible within one year from today. Disposed of. March 04, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge