IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY TUESDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.16714 of 2006 Between: B. Narayana Reddy … Petitioner And The Joint Collector, Kurnool, Kurnool District & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri K.V. Raghuveer This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.16714 of 2006 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not permitting the petitioner to lift the stocks by restoring the petitioner’s authorization even after completion of the three months’ period of suspension, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to supply the commodities by restoring the authorization of Chinna Pendekallu village, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District.” At the hearing, Sri K.V. Raghuveer, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.20932 of 2006 and WVMP.No.2635 of 2006 are also dismissed as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 09.06.2009 ES