IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Appeal from Order No.279 of 2010 Prateek Singh S/o Sri R.M. Singh ……Appellant Versus Smt. Hema Karki @ Leela Karki W/o Sri Prateek Singh .…Respondent Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. Smt. Prabha Naithani, Advocate present for the appellant. Sri H.S. Rawal, Advocate present for the respondent. Heard. This appeal is directed against order dated 18.06.2010 passed by Judge, Family Court, Nainital in suit No.26 of 2009 declining to recall the order dated 29.08.2009 whereby appellant was directed to pay litigation expenses amounting of Rs.5,000/-, travelling expenses amounting of Rs.10,000/- to the respondent. Appellant is resident of district Nainital. The case is pending in district Nainital. Respondent is said to be residing in Pune (Maharashtra). Having considered submissions of learned counsel to the parties, we do not find any illegality in the impugned order challenged before this Court. Therefore, without prejudice the rights of the parties, the appeal is dismissed summarily. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) JKJ 09.09.2010