IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 19TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 30TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 34842 of 2008(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.I. PAULSON, KAPPANI HOUSE, CHENGALOOR P.O., THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.T.R.RAJAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHANGALOOR VILLAGE, THRISSUR. BY GOVT,. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No.34842 OF 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner is mainly aggrieved by Ext.P2, a notice issued by the respondent, requiring him to stop functioning of his quarry. 2. A reading of Ext.P2 shows that, according to the respondent, the petitioner's quarry does not possess the required licenses, permits and certificates. On receipt of Ext.P2, petitioner submits that he has submitted Ext.P3 objection and the receipt of which, is seen acknowledged by Ext.P4. According to the petitioner, along with Ext.P3 he has produced the licence and other certificates that he possesses. It is stated that in view of that the materials that the petitioner had produced before the respondent, the respondent ought to have recalled Ext.P2. WP(c).No.34842/08 /2/ 3. Thus, going by the pleadings in this writ petition, it is obvious that respondent has not pass orders on Ext.P2 notice, in the light of the objections filed by the petitioner and considering the documents that he had produced. 4. Now that Ext.P3 objection filed by the petitioner has seen acknowledged by the respondent, I direct the respondent to consider Ext.P2, in the light of Ex.P3 objection and in the light of the documents are stated to have been produced before him. Orders shall be passed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 3 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. It is clarified that it will be open to the petitioner to raise all contentions including the one that the certificate of the District Medical Officer is unnecessary. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.34842/08 /2/