1 MSS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 347 OF 1996 SHAIKH SHAHABUDDIN & ANR. .. PLAINTIFFS Vs. MOHOMED ARSHAD HUSSAIN & ANR. .. DEFENDANTS Mr. N. K. Singh i/b M. M. Vashi for plaintiffs Mr. Nitesh V. Bhutekar for defendants CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2007. P.C. . The first plaintiff is dead. The court is informed that the 2nd plaintiff is his heir. The learned counsel for the plaintiffs and the learned counsel for the 1st defendant state that the second plaintiff and the defendants have settled the dispute and Consent Terms duly signed by 2nd plaintiff, defendant 1 and defendant 2 and the advocates for the 2nd plaintiff and defendant No. 1 are tendered in the court. They are marked "X". 2. Defendant 2 Mrs. Sohella Razak is not present in the court. The court is informed that she is 2 unwell. However, on the last date of hearing she was present in the court and she had informed the court that she has settled the dispute. After the consent terms were explained to her she confirmed that she wants to file consent terms. Her signature on the present Consent Terms is identified by the learned counsel for the plaintiffs and the learned counsel for the 1st defendant. 3. Order in terms of Consent Terms. Suit is disposed of in terms of Consent Terms. JUDGE.