IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3586 of 2005 RAM LAGAN PRASAD SINGH Versus MAGADH UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- 14 21.05.2010 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Singh, learned A.C. to Mr. Vivekanand Kunwar, counsel representing the Magadh University and Mr. Anant Kumar, learned A.C. to S.C.11 for the State are present. The petitioner superannuated from the post of Reader in Chemistry Deptt., A.N.S. College, Barh, a constituent unit of the Magadh University, Gaya and filed the writ petition for payment of his post retiral benefits as set out in paragraph 2 of the writ petition. A counter affidavit was filed on behalf of the University on 7.3.2008 and which was followed by a supplementary counter affidavit filed on 17.11.2008, the details of the payment made to the petitioner have been set out in the said affidavits. There is no rejoinder to the said affidavits on behalf of the petitioner controverting or disputing the statements made therein, although the same was served upon 2 learned counsel for the petitioner as back as in the year 2008. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either. Having regard to the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of in the light of the statements made in the counter affidavit/supplementary counter affidavit of the University. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)