1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6253 OF 2009 Fatimabi Noormohamed Bawani .. Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.V.Z.Kankaria for the petitioner. Mr.A.B.Vagyani, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. Mr.N.J.Patil for Respondent No.5. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 6th May, 2010 P.C. : 1. This petition is directed against the order/notification dated 24th March, 2009 issued by the Government of Maharashtra through the Under Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya. As per the said notification the Government has accepted the request of the Karad Municipal Council for modification of the final Town Planning Scheme No.1, Karad. The Government has accepted the request for variation of the Scheme as per the Section 91 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. In pursuance of the same, the Karad Municipal Council has already issued public notice inviting the objections from the public. 2. In our view since the Karad Municipal Council has already invited objections from the public, this is not the stage at which this Court 2 would intercept with the proceedings by examining the order of the Government by which the Government has accepted the prayer of the Karad Municipal Council for variation of the Scheme. If the petitioner has any objection regarding such proposed variation he can file the same. 3. It is however apprehension of the learned counsel for the petitioner that perhaps the State Government may take decision immediately and during the vacation period it will not be possible for the petitioner to challenge the said decision. The learned counsel for the Karad Municipal Council states that the said process will take at least not less than one month. In view of this, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would like to file objections regarding the proposed variation. 4. In our view this petition is pre-mature as the petitioner is required to lodge the objections before the Karad Municipal Council. The learned counsel for the petitioner therefore submitted that the petitioner will file appropriate objections before the Karad Municipal Council within a short period. It is clarified that it will be open to the petitioner to take out appropriate proceedings after any final decision is taken in this behalf by the authorities. 5. In view of the above, petition stands disposed of. 6. In view of disposal of the petition, both the Civil Applications bearing 3 Nos.871 of 2010 and 1355 of 2010 also stand disposed of. 7. It is clarified that we have not examined the issue on merits and the contentions of both sides are kept open. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)