1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 15. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.6/2010 (SUDHAKAR SAHEBRAO KHULE [Civil] V/S THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS) In WP/6510/2008 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. V.L.Dhoble, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. V.B.Ghatge, AGP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:18/11/2010 1. Heard. In the light of affidavit in reply of Sheshanarayan Ginyandeo Devadkar dt.7th April, 2010, particularly paragraph No.5, which reads as under, there is compliance of the order and, apparently, there is no breach: “5. I say that accordingly, the Respondent No.2 has considered the proposal of the petitioner and by letter dated 21.10.2009 Annexure -1 it was informed to the District Vocational Education and Training Officer, Beed,that there was a break in the services of the petitioner during the period from 1984-85 and 1989-90 for 364 days and the said period 2 is considered only for the pensionary benefit as per the Government’s letter being No. SHATANVI /(2003/174/03) VYASHI-3 Annexure-2 dated March 2004 and therefore the petitioner’s request for considering his services during the period from 1.7.1984 to 1.7.1990 for the benefit of higher and selection grade is not considerable and hence he is not entitled for annual increment, seniority and higher and selection grade and other benefits. “ 2. The other submission incorporated in paragraph no.3 of the said affidavit, will not be touching scope of the present proceedings. If the petitioner is eligible and entitled to such benefits, pursuant to such policy which is contemplated, the petitioner may move accordingly. For the present, there is compliance and no contempt. Consequently, the contempt petition disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/6-10cp