IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 388 of 2011(S/S) Joga Ram ………..Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents. Present: Mr. M. C. Kandpal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. S. S. Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N. P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. M. C. Kandpal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. N. P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. This writ petition is liable to be dismissed inasmuch as the learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand Sri N. P. Sah has pointed out to this Court that the petitioner has already availed the alternative remedy by means of an appeal/representation before the department concerned which is pending. Therefore, there is no plausible reason for this Court to interfere in this matter, at this stage. The writ petition is dismissed. However, it is directed that respondent no.2, before whom the appeal/representation of the petitioner is pending, shall dispose of the appeal/representation expeditiously particularly since it is pending before him since October 2010. No order as to cost. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 4.5.2011 Kuldeep