IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. 58565-M of 2006 ( O&M ) DATE OF DECISION : 09.11.2006 Smt. Sudesh Malik .... PETITIONER Versus Baljeet Singh ..... RESPONDENT CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Gaurav S. Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * Crl. Misc. No. 66594 of 2006 Application is allowed. The typographical mistake in Annexure P-4, as prayed for in the application, be corrected. On the oral request of counsel for the petitioner, the date of hearing in the main petition, which is listed for December 11, 2006, is pre- poned today. Crl. Misc. No. 58565-M of 2006 The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of order dated 13.5.2006, passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Hisar in Criminal Complaint No. 84-1/05 dated 4.6.2005, whereby the petitioner has been summoned to face trial under Section 3 (x) of the S.C. & S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Sections 341 and 506 IPC. I have heard counsel for the petitioner and gone through the complaint and the impugned summoning order. Crl. Misc. No. 58565-M of 2006 -2- There are specific allegations in the complaint against the petitioner, which constitute the alleged offence. In order to prove the allegations, the respondent himself appeared in the witness box and examined four other witnesses. After considering the prima facie evidence available on record, the petitioner has been summoned to face trial for the aforesaid offences. I do not find any ground to interfere in the impugned order. Dismissed. November 09, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE