IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.37727-M of 2010 Date of Decision:20.1.2011 Randip Kaur and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and also directing respondents No.4 to 6 not to interfere in the personal lives of the petitioners. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Dharam Pal states that statements of respondents No.4 to 6 have been recorded, who state that they shall not interfere in the matrimonial life of the petitioners. In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. However, in case, the petitioners still feel threatened, they are at liberty to approach the Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur, who shall look into the grievances of the petitioners and if found necessary, take appropriate measures in accordance with law. 20.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE