IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CASE No.4414 of 2010 ==================================================== 1. SANJAY KUMAR SHARMA SON OF SRI RAM BACHCHAN SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KAKARAHAT, P.S. DERNI, DISTRICT SARAN. 2. VARUN VERMA SON OF SRI WAZIR PRASAD, RESIDENT OF CHORSUA, P.S. GIRIYAK, DISTRICT NALANDA. 3. ASIM HUSSAIN SON OF LATE ASHAFAQUE HUSSAIN, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA KAZI, P.S. MANER, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus 1. BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. SRI P.K. ROY, CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 3. SRI N.K.P. SINHA, GENERAL MANAGER CUM CHIEF ENGINEER, CENTRAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY AREA, SERPENTINE ROAD, PATNA. ==================================================== With MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CASE No.4554 of 2010 ==================================================== 1. MD. SAKIR SON OF MD. SOHRAB, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KARICHAK CHHAPKI, P.S. BIRPUR, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI. 2. RAKESH KUMAR SON OF SRI VIJAY SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DADPUR, P.S. HULASGANJ, DISTRICT JEHANABAD. 3. HARENDRA KUMAR SON OF LATE JAMUN MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAMPURANI, P.S. MAHUA, DISTRICT VAISHALI. Versus 1. BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. SRI P.K. ROY, CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 3. SRI N.K.P. SINHA, GENERAL MANAGER CUM CHIEF ENGINEER, CENTRAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY AREA, SERPENTINE ROAD, PATNA. ==================================================== With MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CASE No.4555 of 2010 ==================================================== SANJEEV KUMAR @ SANJIV KUMAR SON OF SRI RAJKUMAR RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BELSANDI TARA, P.S. BIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus 1. BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. SRI P.K. ROY, CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 3. SRI N.K.P. SINHA, GENERAL MANAGER CUM CHIEF ENGINEER, CENTRAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY AREA, SERPENTINE ROAD, PATNA. 2 ==================================================== With MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CASE No.4557 of 2010 ==================================================== 1. ALOK KUMAR PANDEY SON OF SRI SURENDRA NATH PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE REOTITH, (CHHATHTIR), P.S. BAIKUNTHPUR, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. 2. MANISH KUMAR SON OF LATE GOURI SHANKAR JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHIRNI, P.S. MALAHI, DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN. 3. DHANANJAY KUMAR SHARMA SON OF BISHWARAM SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAWADA VEN P.S. UDWANT NAGAR, DISTRICT BHOJPUR. 4. RAMNANDAN KUMAR SON OF SRI YADU RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAGHOULI ROLAPAR, P.S. BIDUPUR BAZAR, DISTRICT VAISHALI. Versus 1. BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. SRI P.K. ROY, CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA. 3. SRI N.K.P. SINHA, GENERAL MANAGER CUM CHIEF ENGINEER, CENTRAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY AREA, SERPENTINE ROAD, PATNA. ==================================================== For the Petitioners : M/s D.K. Sinha, Sr. Adv., Abhinav Raj, Advocates. For the B.S.E.B. : M/s Ratan Pd. Sinha, Anand Kr. Ojha, Nivedita Nirvikar, Dharmeshwar Mishra, Advocates. ==================================================== 06. 01.07.2011 Counsel for the Bihar State Electricity Board has filed supplementary affidavit in compliance of the orders of the High Court dated 29.06.2011 duly affirmed by Sri Bijay Kumar Sinha, General Manager cum Chief Engineer, Central Electricity Supply Area, Patna. In paragraph-5 of the said supplementary affidavit the General Manager has stated that pursuant to the proceedings of the Departmental Selection Committee dated 15.12.2010 as also the earlier 3 resolution of the Selection Committee, the entire list of eligible candidates for appointment on the post of Switch Board Operator on contract basis was reviewed in the light of the marks secured by them and list of 97 appointees in different category strictly on merit was drawn, which is also part of agenda note dated 15.12.2010. In this connection, learned counsel further submitted that the aforesaid agenda was approved by the Selection Committee vide proceeding dated 16.12.2010, copy whereof has already been annexed as Annexure-D to the earlier supplementary show cause. In view of the statement made in paragraphs- 3 to 5 of the supplementary affidavit of the General Manager as also the earlier supplementary show cause, I dispose of the four contempt petitions granting liberty to the petitioners that if any of the statements made either in the show cause, supplementary show cause or the supplementary affidavit filed today is discovered to be false then petitioners are granted liberty to take appropriate steps in the matter. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)