IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Review (T) No. 10 of 2008. Decided on: 29th October, 2010. Anjana Devi. ….Petitioner. -Versus- H.P. State Public Service Commission and others. .…Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Ms. Salochana Kaundal, Advocate. For respondent No. 1. : Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate. For respondent No. 2. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. None for respondent No. 3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): I have gone through the judgment dated 24th December, 1992 with the assistance of learned Advocates. There is no error apparent on the face of record. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 29, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?