y?>' <vv" <ri^ HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISCARH. BIIASPUR Witt Petttion (81 No. 7605 of 2007 PETITIOBER RESPONDENT8 Jiteiidra Kliinar Bharadwaj, aged 55 Years, S/o Shri Bisahu Ram Bharadwaj, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Jharanadi, Chhul-Khaddan^ District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Through fhe Secretaiy, Education Departinent D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education OfGcer, Rajnandgaoa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UtTOER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COBSTITUTION OF IHDIA AmBearance: Shri Soinkant Vemia, counsel for the pctitioiier. Shri Pradeep Singh, Panel l^wyer for the State on advancc copy. ORALORDER (20.12.2007) SUBIL KUMAR 8INHA, J Hearcl on adtaission. I^eamed counsel for the petitioner siibinits that the petitioner has passed D.Ed. examination on his own expenses, therefore, he is entitled to receive two advance uicreinents accordmg to circiilars dated 24.12.1998 and Ol.OS.IQQQ. He also suhnuts that in inany identical inatters, thc petitioTis havc been allowed in tenns of the order passed in the casc of ygshu»an)t Kumar Bharadtoa/ Vs. SSiinldpal Conioratlon, Dum <uuX another {2006 ( SSPJR-CG 96}. He submits tbat fhe case of the petitioner is sqiiare.ly cove.red by the said jlldgment. This legal position is not disputed by the leamcd coiinael for the State. However, he suhniits that tTte order may he passed in tenns of the said judgment, but it shall be snbject to verification regarding petitioner's such qualification. WP(S) No. 7605/2007 Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed in terros of tlie order passed in case of Yashwant Kumcir Bharadwaj Vs. Munictpa? Corporation, Durg and armther (Supra) silbject to vcrification of fhe facts as to whether fhe petitioner had acqiiired D.Ed, ExaminatioTi Ccrtificate on his own expenses as per circulars dated 24. 12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether he has becn paid two advance increinents or not. The petition stands finalty disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- - Sunil Kumar Siwha Judse vattt