IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13635 of 2009 NEELAM KUMARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.14515 of 2009 MADHURI DEVI @ MADHURI KUMARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 31.08.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. Both the matters arise out of the same occurrence giving rise to Kotwali P.S.Case No.263 of 2008, instituted under sections 304-B/34 IPC including section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. There appears to be specific allegation against the petitioners who are mother-in-law and married Nanad. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner Neelam Kumari (Cr.Misc.No.13635 of 2009) is the married Nanad. By filing a supplementary affidavit, it is stated that she is in advanced stage of pregnancy. Certain documents in the shape of prescriptions have also been produced. Keeping the aforesaid aspects only in mind, the petitioner Neelam Kumari (Cr.Misc.No.13635 of 2009), in the event of arrest/surrender within three weeks from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Gaya in connection with Kotwali 2 P.S. Case No.263 of 2008 subject to the conditions, as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. So far as the petitioner Madhuri Devi @ Madhuri Kumari (Cr.Misc.No.14515 of 2009) is concerned, this Court is not persuaded to admit the petitioner to anticipatory bail. Her prayer for bail is accordingly rejected. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )