1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 945 OF 2010 Deepak Shrikrishna Bonde . -: versus :- Latabai Vasantrao Bonde and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 26, 2010. Heard Shri S.N. Dhanagare, learned counsel for petitioner and Shri V.K. Paliwal, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3/defendants. Both the courts have concurrently rejected temporary injunction application of petitioner / plaintiff. The way in question has been given to respondent to respondents by Mamlatdar under Section 5 of the Mamlatdar Courts Act. I do not find any jurisdictional error in the matter. Shri Dhanagare, learned counsel for petitioner states that proceedings in Civil Suit No. 223/2008 on the file of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Washim should be expedited. Shri Paliwal, learned counsel for respondents has no objection. Petitioner /plaintiff is at liberty to request the trial Court for expeditious disposal and if it is possible, the trial Court shall attempt to dispose of the suit accordingly. With these directions, Writ Petition is disposed of with no order as to cost. JUDGE Rgd.