'i. 'tl i-^ii ti3i BEFQRETHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Se.'Y^K fv\<a<^-fcr' WRIT PETITION NO.^^If / 2006 PETITIONER ^^r^J0^ R.tio-"--r^^fc->fr"""T". y(6seP"i^;1^^,^......"---" dated---"" RESPONDENTS ^l. ^Arjun Singh Kshatriya, S/o. Shri Sant Singh Kshatriya, Aged about 34 years, R/o. village Naila Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir-Champa. Working as Assistant Teacher in B.D. Mahant Governinent Primaiy School, Janjgir District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.j. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretaiy, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.). 2. The District Education Officer, District Janjgir-Chainpa (C.G.). 3. The Principal, B.D. Mahant Government Primary School, Developnient Block Nawagarh, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4. The CoUector, District Janjgir- Chanipa (C.G.) WRIT PET!TIO_N_UNDER_ AR'nCLE^26/227 OF_^THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT/WRITS.ORDER/ORDERS,DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS IN NATURE OF WRITS OF MANDAMUS, _CERTIQRARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. :..-'' ...^^ ^- ^v-~'/ <c\\w .,y -/^" a, \ \v ";y °/ \^ o XI-HC-78 *TTH^ira»tiic(» 3^-qFTRW, Wtfltl'is, Rtctl'M^ \^l.[iM. ^ 200 3ll^<i Maw ('ictt3°<S,ISI') 3n^T?iTR-(i«ti (raT3II^Tst)1 .fc» S^ITWgfeTSTI^T 17.8.2006 Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Advocc^ Shri Satish l3upta, Dy. 6ovt. l-1eard. Tlie only grievance raised b^ per Rationalization Scheme, 2006 i] then only the junior most teachers o^e to be included in the surpius list and to be tr'snsfer'red as per scheme. Whe junior teaclier-s to the petitioner', t^ut their names have hot been included in the !ist and the name of the petitio^er- has been included in eontravention of the seheme. Against this irr-egularity A ill^ petitioner has the remedy to file a<\ per clause-7 of the rationalizatio^ bound to consider the grievance ^ correct according to the scheme, on Since the petitioner' has available, therefore, he should ^ author-ity and the authority to cons'i^ Jhe time taken by the petiti| shall be condoned in preferring the i^ With the direction aforesaid. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.32| Certified copy as per- rules. +l'i|Id'ifl-f WRfF ff fSF& <J^R2TC ^si^irsn^r te for the petitioner. Idv. for- the State on advance copy. the petitioner in this petition is that as 1 case of surplus teacher-s in any school, •eas, in the present case, there ar-e many ;gality committed by the respondents, the appeal before the appellate authority as scheme cnd the appellate authority is if the petitioner, if the same is found 1 to cor-r-ect the same. equally efficacious alternative remedy refer an appeal before the oppellate ler the points raised by the petitioner. aner in filing this petition till ita disposal [ppeal before the appellate authority. the petition stands disposed of. S8/06 also stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge