IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 30345 of 2011 Date of decision: 18.10.2011 Sarita Devi and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Gautam Diwan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana for the State. Mr. R.S. Mamli, Addvocate for respondents No. 4 to 7, 9 to 14, 16 to 24.. **** RANJIT SINGH J. The petitioner has filed this petition to seek direction to the Superintendent of Police concerned, who according to them, was not acting on the representation filed by them for granting them protection as ordered vide Annexure P-1. Notice was issued. Majority of the respondents have been served. Service has not been effected on respondents No. 8, 15. For the purpose of disposing the petition, there is no need to serve the unserved respondents as their cause is well represented by the other private respondents, who have been served. Mr. Mohunta points out that the petitioners had approached the Superintendent of Police concerned and has given an affidavit to the effect that they would not need any security as they have been living separately and they would ask for security as and when needed. The couple is present in the Court. Crl. Misc. No. M- 30345 of 2011 -2- Though the counsel initially denied this fact but I have spoken to the petitioners, who confirm this fact that they had so stated to the Superintendent of Police concerned. This being the position, apparently this petition has been filed without any merit. Otherwise also, counsel for the respondents has pointed out that there has been no cause for the petitioners to file this petition as none of the private respondents are interfering in the life of the petitioners. There has been some cause of quarrel between the families of the petitioners and that of the respondents but not connected with the matrimonial alliance of the petitioners. In this background, no further directions are required to be issued. However, the petitioners, if ever face any threat, they can approach the SP concerned, who will act in accordance with law. The present petition is disposed of. October 18, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE