IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP-T No. 11878/2008 Decided on:27.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Phool Maya and another. …Petitioners. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is jointly represented by the learned counsel for the parties that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment dated 17.3.2010 rendered by this Court in CWP No. CWP(T) No.10220/2008, titled as Phool Maya versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. 2. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners for grant 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 of work charge status strictly in accordance with Mool Raj Upadhaya versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others, 1994 Supp (2) SCC 316 with all the consequential benefits. Needful within a period of ten weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioners. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 6.4.2010 *awasthi*