Crl. Misc. No. M-35295 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-35295 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: May 19, 2010 Jai Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. SR Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana. GURDEV SINGH, J. Heard. This petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code has been filed by Jai Singh @ Jassa-petitioner/accused for quashing the FIR No. 148 dated 22.12.2005 registered at Police Station Sadar Gohana, District Sonepat, under Sections 323, 452, 506 and 307 read with Section 34 IPC and consequent proceedings pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat, in Sessions Case No. 55 of 2006, on the basis of compromise/agreement dated 6.6.2007 (Annexure P/2) and dated 16.11.2009 (Annexure P/3), which have been entered into between him and respondents No.2 and 3, for resolving their dispute amicably. Report of the trial court was called for, if the parties have voluntarily entered into such a compromise. The report was to be submitted Crl. Misc. No. M-35295 of 2009 2 after recording the statements of the parties. The trial court has submitted its report. It has been reported that the parties made their statements regarding the compromise, which, according to them, was got entered into with the intervention of the respectables of the village and Panchayat and they have sorted out their differences for bringing peace between them. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the said FIR was registered against the present petitioner and Sanjay and Mahipal and that offence under Section 307 IPC was attributed to them and that after the trial, they have already been acquitted. The petitioner is standing his trial for the offences under Section 307, 323, 542 and 506 read with Section 34 IPC. Two of those offences are not compoundable. However, was held by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Cr.) 1052, that the parties can enter into compromise even in respect of the offences which are not compoundable and the FIR can be quashed on the basis thereof. Keeping in view the fact that the other accused, who were the main accused, have already been acquitted after trial and the compromise so entered between the parties, the above said FIR and the consequent proceedings are ordered to be quashed qua the petitioner. The petition is disposed of accordingly. May 19, 2010 (GURDEV SINGH ) prem JUDGE