THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI CONTEMPT CASE No.943 of 2011 Date: 27.09.2011 Between : Dandu Sridevi … Petitioner and K. Shasidhar and others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI CONTEMPT CASE No.943 of 2011 ORDER : Heard Sri K. Raghavacharyulu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Advocate General appearing for the respondents. 2. This contempt case has been filed complaining disobedience of the respondents in complying with the orders of this Court in W.P.No.4484 of 2006, dated 25.2.2011 whereby this Court set aside the order dated 20.11.2005 of the Municipal Corporation of Visakhapatnam, cancelling the permission granted in favour of the petitioner for construction on the land situated in Sy.No.34 of Waltair Ward, Visakhapatnam District. 3. There was a civil litigation in O.S.No.1798 of 1999 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, between the petitioner and the Andhra University and the said suit was decreed by judgment and decree dated 19.3.2002. Despite the same, the construction permission granted in favour of the petitioner was cancelled, which was set aside by this Court in the said writ petition. As the respondents still persisted to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the said site, this contempt case has been filed. 4. After admitting the contempt case, the respondents appeared on 13.9.2011 and the matter was directed to be listed today. 5. The respondents appeared before this Court today. The learned Advocate General has placed before this Court the proceedings in Endorsement B.A.No.10047/05/ACP-II/G2, dated 5.9.2011, issued by the Zonal Commissioner-II, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, stating that in obedience to the orders of this Court in the aforesaid writ petition, the petitioner has been permitted to continue the construction in T.S.No.33 of Waltair as per the approved plan. In addition to the same, the respondents have also filed affidavits expressing their regrets and offering unconditional apology for their initial interference with the construction activity of the petitioner. 6. In view of the said proceedings dated 5.9.2011, I am inclined to accept the unconditional apology offered by the respondents. 7. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. _________________________ JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI 27.09.2011. Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI CONTEMPT CASE No.943 of 2011 27.09.2011 (Msr)