ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2391 OF 2009 PETITION NO.2391 OF 2009 PETITION NO.2391 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S.S.Shah i/by Mr. Indrajeet V. Suryavanshi for the Petitioner. Mr.P.P.Kakade, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 17th February, 2009 : 17th February, 2009 : 17th February, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. . This Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner, who moved an application for withdrawal of show cause notice dated 16/07/2008 and charge sheet dated 16th January, 2009 under Rule 72(3) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rule, 1961. These proceedings are under Section 88 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and basically contended that the claimant bank has been by virtue of merging proceeding became lost its entity and merged with the multi-state Saraswat ( 2 ) Co-operative Bank. 2. Therefore, the basic notice itself is unsustainable. This according to the Petitioner, goes to the root of the matter. Therefore, it is desirable that the concerned authority i.e. Respondent No.2 to decide this Application as early as possible to avoid further delay and complications in the matter. 3. In view of this, the Petition is disposed of. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]