Civil Revision No. 7212 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7212 of 2010 Date of Decision: 25.7.2011 *** Ritu .. Petitioner Vs. Managing Committee Model School Society (Regd.), Rohtak & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. R.M. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anshuman Dalal, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The petitioner, who was one of the plaintiffs in the suit, in which decree dated 29.3.2008 was passed, is dis-satisfied with the order dated 4.8.2010 by dint of which her execution application has been dismissed by the learned Executing Court. Heard. It emerges out from the records that vide aforesaid decree dated 29.3.2008, the suit was partly allowed and the defendants therein were restrained from terminating the services of the plaintiffs therein forcibly and illegally, except by adopting due procedure provided under the law. However, the petitioner, by filing the impugned execution application sought a direction to the defendants to comply with the decree, but without showing anything on record that the defendants are going to dispense with her service or that there had been any violation of the decree dated 29.3.2008, on their part, rather claimed the relief which was never the subject matter of the aforesaid decree dated 29.3.2008 and beyond the jurisdiction of the Executing Court. Thus, the execution petition was held not maintainable at that stage. There is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. The revision petition, being without merit, is accordingly Civil Revision No. 7212 of 2010 2 dismissed. However, it is made clear that the dismissal of execution petition would not preclude the petitioner to file the same again, in case there is any violation on the part of defendants in complying with the aforesaid decree dated 29.3.2008. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE July 25, 2011 Jiten