IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1302 of 2009 Santosh Kumar, son of Sri Jai Prakash Sah, resident of village- Dagree, P.S.-Mahua, District- Vaishali, at present resides D.M.S.-III, Transit House, Quarter No.618/E, Kendriya Vidyalaya Road, Railway Colony, Samastipur. ………..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Sweta Raj, wife of Santosh Kumar, D/o Vijay Shankar Sah, resident of Mohalla-Yushufpur, Near Chaurasiya Mahavidyalaya, P.O.- Hajipur, District- Vaishali. ……..Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 16.09.2011 The husband-petitioner has preferred this revision application against the order dated 7.07.2009 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali at Hajipur in Matrimonial Case No.135/07 by which he has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.5000/-per month as ad-interim maintenance and a sum of Rs.25000/- as lump sum amount as litigation cost. Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Nachiketa Jha, the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and Mrs. I.B.Pandey, the learned A.P.P. for the State. After hearing the learned counsel for both the parties and on perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the petitioner has filed a petition for divorce against 2 the wife opposite party no.2. During the pendency of the matrimonial case, a petition was filed by the opposite party no.2 for ad-interim maintenance. Rejoinder has also been filed on behalf of the petitioner. After considering the income and the facts and circumstances, the learned Principal Judge, Family Court has passed the impugned order. Considering the facts and circumstances stated above, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)