IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-29277 of 2009 Date of decision : 30.10.2009 Daljit Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. R.S.Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.B.S.Teji, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab S. D. ANAND, J. The present plea for the grant of anticipatory bail has to be negatived for the simple reason that it is noticed in the impugned itself that the proceedings for declaring the petitioner a proclaimed offender have already been initiated. The learned Trial Judge also noticed in that order that recovery is yet to be effected. The two reasons recorded by the learned Trial Judge for holding the view aforementioned are self-contained and appropriate. The impugned order categorically indicates whatever weighed with the learned Trial Judge in declining anticipatory bail of the petitioner. I find myself in complete agreement with the reasoning adopted by the learned Trial Judge. Dismissed. October 30, 2008 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE Note: Whether to be referred to Reporter: Yes/No