IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30173 of 2010 1. LALU MANDAL S/O LATE AMRIT MANDAL 2. LAKHAN MANDAL S/O SRI LALU MANDAL 3. MANOJ MANDAL S/O SRI LALU MANDAL 4. JANARDAN MANDAL S/O SRI LALU MANDAL 5. PINTU MANDAL @ PINTU KUMAR S/O SRI LAKHAN MANDAL 6. AYODHYA MANDAL S/O LATE BHIKHU MANDAL, R/O VILLAGE- TATRIYA, P.S. SONO, DIST.- JAMUI 7. BISHWANATH MANDAL S/O LATE RAJENDRA MANDAL, R/O VILLAGE- BARUADIH, P.S.- JHAJHA, DISTRICT- JAMUI. ………………… Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. BRAHMDEO MANDAL S/O LATE JHAMAN MANDAL, R/O VILLAGE- FATEHPUR, P.S. JHAJHA, DISTRICT- JAMUI ……………….Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 01.03.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 13.7.2010 passed in Cr. Revision No. 02/2010 by learned Sessions Judge, Jamui, by which he has dismissed an application of the petitioner filed against the order of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jamui in Jhajha P.S. Case No. 86/08, by which he had allowed an application filed under Section 311 Cr.P.C. On going through the order impugned, I find that the Trial Court had allowed the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. in the interest of justice and, therefore, finding no merit in the application, the same is dismissed. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the examination of the witnesses fixing a time limit of one month their examination as it had originally been done by the Trial Court. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )