1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C.A. NO. 8455/08 IN MCA ST. NO. 16250/08 IN REJ. FIRST APPEAL NO. 891/07. Sheshrao Pawar .vs. Meerabai Rathod & others ________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders. Registrars orders. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATED : MARCH 25, 2009. Heard Mr. Tathod, learned Counsel for the applicant. The application is moved for seeking condonation of delay which is caused in filing the application for restoration. The learned advocate submits that the delay caused is purely unintentional and because of the inadvertence. The delay is condoned. The application is allowed subject to payment of costs of Rs.500/- in favour of High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Nagpur within a period of two weeks. M.C.A. ST. NO. 16250/08 : Mr. Tathod, learned Counsel for the applicant, submits that the appeal came to be dismissed for non-removal of office objection, namely, that the appellant has not deposited the statutory amount. The learned Advocate for the applicant submits that if time is granted, he will deposit the amount within a period of one week from today. Time granted. The delay is condoned on depositing the amount. With these observations, the application is allowed. J. JUDGE.