IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR, ^-2^ f ContemDt Petition No. / 20 05 PETITIONER SINGLE BENCH ^S.K.Sahay s/6 Late Ebaneshwar Dayal Sahay, Retired Head Master, age 73 years, r/o Sallyatol.L, Kunkuri, DistrJ-ct Jashpur, C.G. RESPONDENTS COHTEMNOR V E R S U _3 ; 1. SitiriP'c-Dalai., Secretary, Tribal welfare Department, D.K.S. Bbawan. ^ Ralpur, (C.G.). M 2. Bbupendra Kamar Rajput, Assigtant Conm.i.ssioner, S.'^AR?'"' A>:F| l^ Tribal Welfare Department tK«<^'/^y ^ Jashpur, C.G. ^yy ,^""y '"<^-" ^y 3. Jitlya Ram Nirala, Block Education Officer, Duldula, Jashpur, C.G. <t^ •--• CONTEMPT POTmON UNDER ABTZ B 215 OF THE CONSS'ITUTION OP INDIA READ WCTH SECTION-T2- OF THE CONTEMPT pP_,C9URTS ACTT ^ / HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTIS6ARH SINGLEBENCH : HON'BLE SHRI H.L. DATTU, C.J. Petitioner: Responclent: ContemptPetition No.42 of 2005 S.K^Sahay Versus Shri P.C.Datai and others Present: Shri A.K.Prasad, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, counset for respondent No.2. None appears for other respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 1st March, 2007) This Court, white disposing of Writ Petition No.4142/2003, by order dated 8-4-2004, had directed the petitioner to file an appropriate representation before the respondents and further the respondents had been directed to consider the same in accordance wlth law. Alleging that the respondents have not complied with the orders and directlons issued by tftis Court, the petitioner has filed this contempt petition before this Court for initiating contempt proceedings. ^ / 2. . Respondent No.2 has entered appearance through learned counsel and has also filed his counter affidavit. In that, he has stated on oath at after consideringthe representetion of the petitioner, he has passed an appropriate order. Since there'is substantial compliance .—2- v\ of the orders and directions issued by this Court, 1 do not intend to take cognizance of this contempt petition. 3. Accordingly, the cont^mpt petition is rejected. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to question the correctness or otherwise of the orders/endorsements issued by the respondents after considering the representation of the petitioner, before Vhe appropriate forum. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- Chief Jiistice