IN THE HIGH COUKT OF )UDICATURE AT BILASPUR(C.G) 16; ? 3% MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO. 2004 mvkmg aggmh Miscellaneous Appeal under/section T73 Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Mk ‘ A, PPELLANT ix’ CLAIMANT Q (1) Sasfm TI'wal'f, S/o SH‘ Harendra (j Mohan T{eam‘, Aged abouf— 39 years, OccupaJcI‘om Service, R/o Shyam Nagar, Raipul(C.G.) VEKSUS gESPONDENT > VC‘I) Basir Mohammad S/o Sri Fahim /NON—APPLICANT t Mohammad, Agéd about 22 yaars, Occupafiom Sumo Dr'iverJl/o— Baroda Bazar, Mabasamund, Tahsil & Disff— MabasamuncKCG.) § y? ~Naresh Kumar Goya] S/o SH q W..w"':n Niranian La! Goya! R/o Sfation 66 \‘a ’ Qi’uw ' Road, Mahasamund, Tahsx'i St @.. ' ' Distb MahasamuncKCG.) The Orienfal M lnsurancc Company Limiiedq Divisional OFFice~Nam Through : Divisional Manager, Divisional O?Fice~ Kacbahari chowk, Raipur(C.G.) f’W XI-HC 78 3am, 5W, Wm: (égmloog, m Wuzfgi ‘ “{L/ Mm (Wu) WWW Division Bench: — Hon’ble Mr. T.P. Sharma and Hon’bie Mr. R.N. Chandrakar, JJ. 16-9—2010 hearing second time, none present for When the matter is caiied for the appellant. No representation i§ made. None present for respondent Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, couns Heard. ln absence of representatior except to dismiss the appeal is left. The appeal is dismissed for costs. ‘ As—‘r-w‘ ll a Sdl— t T.P. sharma Judge l l WW wm $Wané¥r k l i (n pNoJ & 2 also. lei for respondent No.3. l on behalf of the appellant, no option want of prosecution. No order as to Sd/* i 'R.N. Chandrakal‘ a Judge