IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 102 OF 2009 MARVIN S. GONSALVES AND 3 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 12 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Rohit Bras De Sa, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. Sapna Mordekar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondents No.1 to 6. Coram:- SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 18th February, 2009 P.C. The petitioners claim that there are unauthorised constructions carried out by the private respondents on the agricultural land and without compliance of any of the statutory provisions. It is averred that they were tenants of land who even received compensation as agricultural tenants and the raising of construction is contrary to the law in all respects. They claim to have made a representation to the Administrator and Collector on 28.1.2009, requesting the said Authority to prevent and restrain respondents No.8, 9 and 10 from putting up any construction on the property indicated in the writ petition. It is also averred that a show cause notice had been issued by the Administrator on 12.12.2008 to one of the parties. However, no action has been taken in relation to other parties. On this premise, a prayer has been made in the writ petition for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction to the Administrator to take action and initiate proceedings under the Goa Land (Prohibition) Act against the said respondents and also directing them to restore the land to its original condition, after demolition of the structure, in accordance with the provisions of Section 32(2)(c) and 33(1)(III) of the Land Revenue Code. 2. The learned Advocate General appearing for the State fairly stated that the competent Authority would look into the entire matter and even the grievances made and details given in the present writ petition and pass appropriate orders, within six weeks from today. 3. We find the stand of the Government to be fair and we expect the Administrator and the Collector to act in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders expeditiously and in any case not later than six weeks, preferably, after hearing the petitioners and in accordance with law. 4. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed off. No order as to costs. SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. N. A. BRITTO, J. ssm.