IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 23rd day of May, 2012 Ist Bail Application No. 601 of 2012 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Sachin ………… Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ………… Opposite Party Arising out of Crime No. 35 of 2012 Under Sections: 394, 324 of I.P.C. Police Station: Kotwali Manglore District: Haridwar. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Applicant Sachin, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 35 of 2012, relating to offences punishable under Section 394, 324 of I.P.C., police station Kotwali Manglore, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail. Informant lodged an FIR on 10.01.2012 alleging that his son was assaulted by the present applicant and another co-accused and snatched away `5,000/- from his son. Copy of said FIR is annexed as Annexure-1 to the bail application. It is also stated that the injured was medically examined on 10.01.2012. A copy of medical report is also annexed as Annexure –2 to the bail application. Whereas learned Brief Holder for the State has opposed the bail, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the reality of the case is that uncle of the 2 applicant moved an application under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. before the Magistrate on 16.04.2012 against four constables of reporting outpost Narsan, police station Kotwali Manglore, District Haridwar. In order to pressurize the uncle of the applicant to withdraw said application filed under Section 156(3) the police personnel have falsely implicated his nephew in the present case. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that there is delay of 24 days in lodging the first information report. Applicant is in jail since 17.04.2012. It is also submitted that the applicant has no previous criminal history. Considering the facts and circumstances enumerated as above, a case of bail is made out in favour of the present applicant. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Sachin be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of like amount to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee. [ ( .C. Dhyani, J. ) U Dt. May 23, 2012. Negi