COCP No. 408 of 2005 -: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 408 of 2005 Date of decision: November 09, 2006. Sohan Lal Verma ...Petitioner(s) v. Kirpal Singh Brar ...Respondent(s) Present: Shri KDS Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri H.S. Sethi, Advocate for the respondent. Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Mr. H.S. Sethi, Learned Counsel representing the respondent, states that in compliance to the order dated September 5, 2006, a bank draft No.537369 dated 30.10.2006 has been got prepared and was sent to the petitioner on 1.11.2006. It is stated that the petitioner, however, refused to accept the same. Let the above said draft be handed over to Learned Counsel for the petitioner who may accept the same without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner. Alternatively, it may be sent to the petitioner by way of registered post. According to Mr. Sethi, all the other retiral benefits have already been paid to the petitioner and with the payment of the arrears of leave encashment for the period from 26.11.1956 to 31.3.1961 vide above stated draft, the entire claim of the petitioner stands satisfied. In view of the above stand taken by the respondent, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek/represent for any COCP No. 408 of 2005 -: 2 :- other monetary benefit, if he is so entitled to claim the same before an appropriate forum, if so advised. Disposed of. Rule discharged. November 09, 2006. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge