$£N§LE Bww ‘ ’2 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT QF QHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(S). é[a Q [2009 : /’ 1. Samlu Ram, Son of Shri Ratan, aged about 52 years, Occupation Peon, Working at Mata Rukhmani Seva Sansthan, Dimrapal, District Bastar (Chhatisgarh) Buwdmg‘i—Ram Kashyap, Son of Rajman Kashyap, aged about 51 years, Occupation Cook, Working at Mata'R‘ukhmani Seva , Sansthan, Baiwadi, District Bastar g ‘ (Chhatisgarh) ‘ VERsus , State of Chhattisgarh, Through : «w Secretary, Tribal Welfare Deaprtment, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.), REsPONDENTs: / 1. —_——-——-—— The Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur (C.G.), The Secretary, Mata Rukhmani Seva Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tah. & District Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OF THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 6108 of2009 PETITIONERS : Samlu Ram & another. VERSUS ‘ State 0f Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. A ' ‘ . Present: Shri D.N.Prajapati, Advocate for the petitioners. RESPONDENTS ORDER ORAL Shn' A.V.Shn'dhar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents 1 & 2 (Passed on 26 day of October, 2009) Heard learned counsel for the parties: l. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Smf. ALali v. State of Chkaz‘l‘isgarh if? Others}, thus the petitioners may be permitted to make a representation to decide their ease in the light of aforestated decision, subject to Verification asto whether the respondent No. 3-Institute is a Govemment Aided school and the petitioners are teachers within the sanctioned strength. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents 1 and 2 submits that in the event, the petitioner make a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. 3. In View of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed o£ M ‘ 2007 (1) BLJ 265 Sa‘ish §' . .