R.S.A No. 3431 of 2002 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A No. 3431 of 2002 Date of decision : November 27, 2008 Tilak Raj and others ...... Appellants through Mr.Krishan Sehajpal, Advocate v. Mohinder Singh, ...... Respondent through Mr.B.S.Bali, Advocate CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This appeal has been filed against concurrent judgments of the Courts below (albeit with a modification by the learned lower appellate Court) decreeing the suit of the plaintiff/respondent for declaration about the shares of the respective parties in the land in dispute. Learned counsel for the appellants has not been able to persuade me that the finding of fact on the extent of shares of the parties is wrong. Further, I find that the only grouse which the appellants could have had has been redressed by the learned lower appellate Court by vacating the injunction vide which the appellants were restrained from alienating even their undisputed share in the property. R.S.A No. 3431 of 2002 ::2:: In this view of the matter, I hold that the questions of law proposed in this appeal do not arise. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 27 , 2008. JUDGE `kk'