T- HICai COl»RTOF CHHAVnSGARH AT BILASPXTR Wtit Petttiou (Ct No. 2620 of 2008 PETITIONBR RESPQmWNTS Om Prkash Sharma, S/o Shri Kamleshwar Thakur, aged about 36 years, R/o Village Marhatiya, Distt Garhwa (Jharkhand) VBRSU8 1. State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough- the Secretary Dcpartment of School Education, Raipur, D.K.S. Bhawan,Raipur (CG) 2. Pt. Ravi Shanker Shiikla University, Raipur through- The Registrar, Raipur (CG) 3. The Principal Shri Shaukarachaiya Maha Vidyalaya, Scctor-6, Bhilai Nagar (CG) Present: Mr. A.N, Pandey, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Mr. Sushfl Dubey, Govt. Advocate for fhe State. Mr. Vinsy Paadqr, Advocate for Pt. Ravi Shankar Shukla Uiuversity. ORALORDBR (Passed on 08.05.2008) Per Dhirendra MIshTa. J; 1. Heari, 2. The question involved in fhis pctUion is that the petitiouer, who bctoiigs to Other Backward Categories aad resident of outside fhe State of Chhattisgarh, is pursuiag his studies ia B.Ed. course in fhe respondent No.S-CoUege. He has been admitted ia thc said course after successfulty participating in the conunon enteance examinatiou conducted by (he State Councfl for Education Research and Traiaing (for short 'SCERT^ through Chliattisgarh Professional Examination Board and he was aUowed relaxation of SVo in the nmumuia marks required iu the prequalification examination. However, the respondent-Pt. Ravi Shankar Shiikla UDwersily, Raipur (for short 'Uiuversity^ bas refdscd to issue admission card to fhe petitktner on the ground that his admisskin to fhe above course by aUowing relaxatiou of 9% is fflegal, as fhe petitioner is resident of other State and n . .,f>:,'.^y?&. y s'r""v<%,. !l ^f"'^. "'^^.S-S, 'V%K9^/ therefore, he is not entifled for relaxation on the ground that he belong to ofher backwards classes categoiy, as the same is available onty to the caodidates of the above categories who are residents ofthe State ofChhattisgarh. 3. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioner submits that simflar objection of rcspondent-Uiuversily in Writ Pe'titioa [c] No.7232/07 betwcen 'Soni Rakhi Bck and ofhers Vs. Stete of C.G. & others' and other connected pctitions have been decided by this Court vide order dated 28.3.2008 and prayed fhat fhis petition inay also be disposed in terms of the above order. This fact has not been disputed by leamed counsel for fhe respondents. 4. In view ofthe oider dated 28.3.2008 passed in Writ Ptetitioa [c] No.7232/07 between 'Soni Rakhi Bek and ofhcra Vs. State ofC.G. and ofhers', the instaut petition is aUowed aad fhe respondent- Pt. Ravi SIianlrar Shukla Universily, Raipur is directcd to enroU the petitioner as student of B.Ed. course ia the coUege aEEEIiated to it and issue him eligibility certificate for appearing in the cxamiaation.. 5. No order as costs. Sd/- . ! DhirendraMishra Judge 61- Sit&a