!\; \ \. VT*i '•v^! \\T^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2453/1997 Raj Kumar Sharma SE others PETITIONER VERSUS State of C.G. & others RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTUTION 1] OF INDIA Particulars of the Petitioners:- I- Raj Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Ramanand Sharma aged about 32 yeas, Assistant Teacher Shri Wamanrao Lakhe Higher Secondary School Raipur [C.G.]. 2- Ram Kumar Sen S/o Shri Bhulluram Sen aged about 33 years, Assistant Teacher, Rashtriya Higher Secondary School, Chhatod, District Raipur [C.G.]. 3- Basant Kumar Deiyangan S/o Shri Gokul Dewangan aged about 33 years, Assistant Teacher, Daji Marathi Higher Secondary School, Dhamtari, District Raipur [C.G.] 4- Ku. Sadika Sultana Siddiqui D/o Shri S.M. Siddiqui Assistant Teacher, Shri Laxminarayan Girls Higher Secondary School Raipur. 5- Ku. Hamila Khatun, Assistant Teacher, Urdu Girls Higher Secondary School, Raipur [C.G.]. 2] Particulars of the respondents:- 1- State of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.]. _1.1 c l^ 2- The Director, Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, H.Q. at Raipur [C.G.]" 3- The Principal Shri Wamanrao Lakhe Higher Secondaiy School, Raipur [C.G.]. 4- The Principal, Rashtriya Higher Secondary School, Chhatod, District Raipur [C.G.]. 5- The Principal, Daji Marathi Higher Secondary School, Dhamtari, District Raipur [C.G.]. 6- The Principal, Shri Laxminarayan Girls Higher Secondary School, Raipur [C.G.] 7- The Principal, Urdu Giris Higher Secondary School, Raipur [C.G.]. wavs T XI-HC—78 .iTI^W ^il fyw ?]•';! a^r ^_ ^/ *<i*ic'ir «)*iicb 'S'sf •<ii<<i<n<4, ®x)|^'is,fs<dl'y^< ..M.M^.24.^^ 200 sn^T ''ra'^' (licifjs<<^) 07-S9-201Q: Shri R.K. Keshawani, counsei Shri Vivek Sharma, PL for the S Grievances of the petit'oners a Assistant, but su'osequentiv tneir posta Hcience. Counsel for the petitioners revised pay scale and other benefits teachers emplo'/ed by the Governmi petitioner may be permitted to v/ithdi proper representation before the respc] Madhya Pradesh High Court passed MPJR SN 3 (Jageet Singh Bhatia & or^ some time frame mav be flxed fo'r d4 because they are ralsing their grievan(| been aranted to them. Counsei for the State submitl would be decided in accordance with 'ii Maa'hya Pradesh High Court. . Accordingiy; the petition is dj aforesaid. Petitioners are permitted to| the respondent No. 1 from the date o) the necessary documents and in turrj accordance with la'.'v '"ithin further five )3r the petitioners. Itate. [•e that they were inltlaily appolnted as Lab were re-desiflnated as Assistant Teacher. suDm •espc|ndent <M*fTt?!<i1l TTTE^ff ^ f^^t" •t.pil^K ^aTRnan^r lits that the rsspondents are not giving |to the petitioners as is being given to the Int schooi. He submits that at this staae flaw the present petition with iiberty to f'te ~ No. 1 in terms of the judgment of the |in W.P. No. 1599/99 reported in 2007 (i) i. Vs. State of M.P.). He further submits Shat ioidina the reDresentation of the oetitioner |e since iast 13 years but the same has not the representation of the petltioner bw and also considering the judgment of the femissed as '."ithdrawn va/ith the 'ibertv as Rie representation 'A'ithin one month before receipt of copy o* this order a!ong with ai the resDondents shall deoide the same in frionths. . ' • . PritinkerDiwaker s. V"v 1 ii.