IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA S.L.A. No.91 of 2009 TEJ PRATAP PRASAD, son of late Shyam Sunder Prasad, resident of village Tejpurwa, P.S. Marhawrrah, district Saran .. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Birendra Prasad, son of late Shyam Sunder Prasad 3. Pramod Prasad, son of Birendra Prasad 4. Binay Prasad, son of Birendra Prasad 5. Nand Kishor Sah, son of late Ram Narayan Sah No. 2 to 5 are residents of village Tejpurwa, P.S. Marhawrrah, district Saran .. Opposite Parties **** /2/ 06.10.2009 Heard both the sides. 2. The appellant is aggrieved by the order of acquittal passed in favour of opposite parties 2 to 5 for the offences under Sections 323, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code on the ground that even though the trial Court has discussed the evidence of every witness at the end of same he has not recorded a separate finding. 3. However, on perusal of the judgment, I find that the materials have been well appraised even though a short conclusion has been arrived at, but, for that reason I am not inclined to interfere with the judgment of acquittal and, therefore, the application is dismissed. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)