IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11162 of 2010 (O&M) Decided on : 27-08 2010 Darshan Lal and another ....Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikas Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Raman B Garg, Advocate for respondent no.3. Mr. Sanjeev Bansal, Advocate for respondent nos. 4 and 5. MAHESH GROVER, J Learned counsel for respondent nos. 4 and 5 has pointed out that Rule 17 which has been relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners in the instant petition has already been amended and therefore, the entire case which has been set out is without any substance. He has referred to amended Rule 17 which is at total variance with the Rule which has been relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and noticing the fact that the learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance on an out-dated Rule which does not bear any relevance and has since been amended and does not cover the controversy of the petitioners, the present petition being devoid of any merit is hereby dismissed. August 27, 2010 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge