.© 1^ ^' IRf?s. 'H: IN THE HIGH COUBT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BII,A3PUR (C.G.) 3S t--T~ PETITIONER .M// ffc%e^ j/y^ ^\y .*•* vA~l\V <^yy ^'•"" RESPON"EI.)TS <^ ,.:/ .-y WRIT PETITION N0.28&) / 2004 Ramayan Prasa^ Mlshra, ,<'^& S/o, latg Shri Shambhu prasa^ Mishra; age^ about 52 years> Occupation - Service; Forester Porest Rance Office TTjrgkon-'al, Forest r'ivision East Bhanupra- tappur; 'nistt. North Bastar, Kanker (chhattisgarh). VE RS U S ! 1) State of Chhattisgarha through ; Secretary Forest Department n.K.S. Bhawan; Raipur, (C,G.). 2) principal Ghief Conservator of Forest, Raipur (C.G.). 3) conservator of Forest, circle Kanker nistrict North Bastar> Kanker (chhattisgarh) . 4) Divisi.onal Forest officer, Forest fiivision East Bhanu- pratappur. Bhanupratappur, Distt. North Bastar, Kanker (Chhattisgarh) . WSIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 GF THE COKSTITUTIOg OF IN"IA FOR WRIT/WRITS OR r'lRECTION/nIRECTIOI-S. .&.!? K i i^- tiB 3.2.2005 Sh'ri Subhash Yadav, Couns^l for thg petitioner. Shri U.N.S.Deo, 6overnmei(t Advocate for the State/respondents. Heard on admission. ! The petitioner has filed t^is writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of Inc^ia for quashing of memo dated 27.9.2004(Annexure P-6) by wh|ch objections have been called by the aggrieved persons regarding fixa(t'ion of their seniority as mentioned in this nsemo and thereafter regarc^ing reversion from their promoted post of Forestensto -Hie post of Fores-t SuardS. Learned counsel for the pe^-itioner submits that the petitioner was dppointed as a Forest Suard in tl^e year 1972. On the basis of position in the gradation list, he wos given 29.9.2003. Thereafter, the afoiiesaid memo dated 27.9.2004 (Annexure P-6) has been issued by the District North Bastar, Kanker, refixation of seniority, On the sEsi&Lvf rsversion/demotion has promotion to the post of Forester on ^onservator of Forest, Circle Kanker inviting objections in relation to the basis of which 19 persons are to be affected dnd as a consequence t^ieir reversion/demotion may take place. He further submits that he has filed his objections vide Annexure P-7 on 5.10.2004 along with 4 annex^res. He also submits that till date no Gi.PRJ—FS/350—i2/200&—50,000. been rewived hy the petitioner s^ •<is<!i(.f<i, ®^wi^,Iq^frey ^^...{^.....^^um f aii^r'H^C^q^) ffw %^?? sTqNr 'L.- '•':.4 ii^ sutiita ^piferata irofl^ fees•^RSK ^wRm 3i)^i In -ttie opinion of •this Court-.jAnnexure P-6 which is siinply a memo regarding calling of objections, cai^iot be imgugned in this writ petition at this stage. The petition seejns to be prema'ture. Zt is hereby dismissed. However, a liberty is ^ranted to •ttie petitioner to raise his grievance afresh in case even aft^- considenition of his objection he is sserved with the order of demotiorj/reversion from the post of Forester to Forest Suard. As s-tated above, the peti^ion is dismissed wi-th •the aforesaid liberty granted in fwour of the pefitK SuniIKumar Sinha Judge vwet f