IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17527 of 2011 1. Upendra Paswan Son Of Late Sarju Paswan R/O Villaae- Bedauli,Gram Panchayat Naudhiha,Ps-Imamganj,Distt-Gaya. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Deputy Development Commissioner,Gaya. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer,Sherghati,Gaya. 4. The Block Development Officer,Imamganj,Gaya. 5. The Panchayat Secretary,Naudiha Gram Panchayat,Imamganj,Gaya. 6. The Mukhiya,Naudiha Gram Panchayat,Imamganj,Gaya. 2 25.11.2011 The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer at Imamganj block in the district of Gaya, seeks quashing of the notice issued by the Subdivisional Officer, Sherghati, Gaya whereby he has been directed to refund a sum of Rs.2,93,180/- towards the value of undistributed rice to the tune of 214 quintals allotted under S.G.RY. Scheme at the A.P.L. rate of Rs.13.75 per Kgs. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern the instant writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection, as mentioned therein, with the 2 KHAN condition that the petitioner would deposit 15% of the value of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within six weeks from today. The petitioner should also file a representation raising his grievance before the Subdivisional Officer, Sherghati, Gaya within four weeks from today which would be disposed of by the authority concerned within further ten weeks. In the meanwhile, no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner. (S.P.Singh,J)