1 ss1400-11 vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.1400 OF 2011 Lalchand Sagarmal ....Plaintiff V/s. Shivprasad Rupnarayan ....Defendant Mr.Ramesh Jain i/b Ramesh Jain & Kusum Jain for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 13TH DECEMBER, 2011. P.C. :- 1. The suit is based on a demand promissory note. The defendant having failed to make payment in respect thereof, the plaintiff by its advocate’s letter demanded payment. There was no reply to the same. 2. The defendant has not filed an appearance. The defendant is absent. 3. A compilation of the documents is tendered in Court. The same is taken on record and marked Exhibit “A” collectively. The money lender licence is a part thereof. There is nothing on record that militates against the plaintiff’s claim in the suit. This is a fit case to accept the averments and submissions contained in the plaint as 2 ss1400-11 correct. 4. In the circumstances, the suit is decreed as prayed. However, interest after the date of the suit shall be at the rate of 12% p.a. Costs to be quantified as per rules. Refund, if any, as per rules.