IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3800 of 2010 SHAMBHU NATH PANDEY . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. . ----------- 05. 25.02.2011 We have heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is stated to be father of the deceased husband of respondent no.11, who has remarried. From the pleadings in the modification application the same appears to be mis-conceived. If, the petitioner is aggrieved by the order in Cr.W.J.C. No. 692 of 2010, or is of the opinion that it was obtained by suppression of fact, the remedy lies in an appropriate application and not in a modification application. The modification application is dismissed. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.) (Jyoti Saran, J.)