1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 382 OF 2009 Govind Ramdas Gajbhiye .vs. State of Mah. & another. ________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders. Registrars orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & P.B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : JULY 30, 2009. Heard Mr. M.S. Wakil, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.J. Jichkar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents. The Writ Petition is directed against the order dated 6.11.2008 passed by the D.I.G., Prison, Nagpur whereby the application of the petitioner for grant of furlough leave came to be rejected on the ground that the surety which is furnished by the petitioner, i.e. Mohammad Hamid Sayyad is a person who has stated before the police that he does not know the petitioner nor is aware about him. It is in such situation, the Competent Authority rejected the application of the petitioner for grant of furlough leave for want of a valid surety. The learned Counsel for the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish another valid surety and prayed that the respondent may be directed to reconsider the application of the petitioner for grant of furlough. Mr. S.J. Jichkar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents, states that if the petitioner 2 furnishes valid surety, in that event, prayer of the petitioner for grant of furlough leave would be considered in accordance with the law. On the backdrop of the above referred facts, no further action in the present Criminal Writ Petition is necessary. The Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE. J.