3' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WMT PETITION N0. 33^ 72006 PETITIONER Komal Singh Kanwar, S/0. Late Ganpat Singh Kanwar, -.•••' .•• .^0- ^l^^S:.)--'' .,.•••" ^^yf' -..••"'' Tehsil : Kartala, aged about 29 years. R/o : Village : Rampur, /!?^J^l..-- ...•••"<3^??""' ^^?y' ^^ sgf-&v RESPONDENTS ^ ^ Distt. :,Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, ,.- Through - The Secretary, Revenue Departnient. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector, Korba, District-Korba (C.G.) 3. The Sub Divisional Officer, / (Revenue) Korba, Distt. : Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 SfI^TqiT R-fi+sn^r sblKtiflfeT afflwo 731 '<lllld''<, wrflu'16, Isldltiy 311^1 lisi<h 11*<(TI SBHiqi -••t ^...^.6^/ft6..^ 200^ f^% oii^i swiWHfer 11.07.2W6. Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Pa Mr. A.S. Kachhawaha, GG\ advance copy. Heard both the counsel. t|6l, counsel for the petitioner. i|t. Advocate for the State/respondents, on The petitioner has filed thi Constitution of India, with the consider the case of the regular post. writ petition under Article 226/227 of the ||>rayer that respondents be directed to petitior|er for compassionate appointment on a The case of the petitioner he was working as a Patwari. Government which has been m< course the petitioner was r4< compassionate appointment withii|i dependent is minor then to Whereas, in this case the applic^tion after three years, moreover, the he was not eligible on account o1] typing. Therefore, for the forego) the petitioner's father in the belatedly, the petitioner has interference by this Court. As sucri <t>nf<-i41-< *iiiiiTfftecA<(Si<di< ^)3|1^T3lT^r fe that his father died on 25.04.1995 when Therefore, as per the policy of the ^ntioned in Annexute-P/1 that in normal ^quired to move an application for a period ofthree months and in case the ple the applicah'on within three years. i, as has been menfioned, was filed ()ost for which the petitioner had applied, the reason that he has no knowledge of |ng reasons and particularly, the fact that 1995 and he made the application been able to make out a case for i, the petition stands dismissed^ y^ar n4t Sdi- L.C. BhsEiSO lutige (Ifl^y^)