IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO. 287 OF 2010. In the matter of the Companies Act, 1 of 1956; AND In the matter of Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956; AND In the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation of PANTHEON INVESTCON PRIVATE LIMITED with TRIO MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED TRIO MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 218- 220, A-Z Industrial Estate, Lower Parel, Mumbai 400034. ) ) ) ) ) …Applicant Company. Called for Summons for Direction Coram: S. J. Kathawalla, J Date: 23rd April, 2010 Mr. Rajesh Shah i/b M/s. Rajesh Shah & Co., Advocate for the Applicant MINUTES OF THE ORDER UPON the application of the Applicant Company abovenamed by a Summons for Directions AND UPON HEARING Mr. Rajesh Shah instructed by M/s. Rajesh Shah & Co., Advocate for the Applicant Company, AND UPON READING the Affidavit dated 16th day of April, 2010 of Mr. Malav M. Shah, Authorised Signatory of the Applicant Company, in support of the Summons for Directions, IT IS ORDERED:- 1 1. That the convening and holding the meeting of the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company to consider and approve the proposed Arrangement embodied in the Scheme of Amalgamation of PANTHEON INVESTCON PRIVATE LIMITED, the Transferor Company with TRIO MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED, “the Applicant / Transferee Company” is dispensed with in view of the consents given by all the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company, which are annexed as Exhibits “F-1” and “F-2” to the affidavit in support of the Summons for Direction. 2. There are no Secured and Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Company as mentioned in paragraph 15 of the Affidavit in support of Summons for Directions, hence, the question of convening and holding the meeting of Secured and Unsecured Creditors does not arise. (S. J. Kathawalla, J) 2