IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPLIR (C' (i WRITFETmONNO. S'^6^' 72005 1->CTIT10NER VERSUS Gaytam Ram 0hawai-e ,S/() Slil'cu Ghasi Ram 0haware,,aged uboiit 35 yea»rs ,Shikslia Karmf.Gr.iilGlII PrimaryScbobl Doomerktii'cw;! U Ittf k Marwahi Disst; Biliispur (C.G.) •GSPONDENTS ^^•^ zfrF'5-" ....••-" z' l'1-".-; ...--^^'^...---" ^•^s^l.^""""'-: ^^'s'\y"~" . . ^•^y. Aeft-"" ^^ ^" G^totl"R.G.^ A'. State of Chhattisgarh llirougli: llii.' Seeretary, Department oT SC|](K)I Education, Mantralay, I). K. S, Bhayi'an, Raipur (Chh.ittisg.iirli) .2. The Additlonal Coltecldi-, l>uiitlr;( Road ,Disst. Bilaspur (C.C!.^ 3. .lanpad Panchayat Marwahi Through : the Clii,u;l lixct'itlivc Officer Janpad Pahchyiil - Marwahi. Disst.Bilaspur (C.U.) WR1T PETITION UNDERARTICLES 226/227 OF THIi GQNS'l'ri'l I'rK^N: ' . OF'DsrDIA ; . • :;., ':. • 11 XI-HC-22 aii^r^i RwEfraii^ ^l* 'H^tt %-%. t^.'*ll<il§j'!i,'8':nl'(f*rej,j.iRli?ll'tji3< *ll»1WI;i(>*l|C|) ^T^?T'IT|=f|R;^ tysiii^a^i.•^^wy""; 25-1t.2005 "; ShriA.V. ShridharRao, learr Stiri AkhilAgra'wal, P.L; fotl •- ''.Heard.1;''^;:,'•:'::1!:<''^^1 •,;.'.•;: The petitioner vtss appplnti 22,3.2001 asprofciatjonerandtfte under Ryle 7 af Panchayat ;Sif ConditionsofSeroic^Rules, 1997^ 1997"). Initially, the petition^r vij Grade II 1 6h probatjbn fpr three^ye^ particuJarseHoolsp^thathesen^si Petitioner has corapleted appears that his probationyperiod^ yfears period Will be completed oh this petitipn chajlenging that^ Rule| compliedwithbecause/heftasnot three ^arsprob^ttOKpenod. Leamed counset contehds t( probationerthat tiis sereice has two years. Since the petitionerl extendingAhe.periodofprpbationfll the extended period of probation Ts| 'On perusal ofthepapers,l^i fjetjtioner is not sustainabte in la<|< prOvides that the proBation period) ledcounselforthepetitiQner. ftieState. 'wi^ltri^^t^fffRll^'fe^'l^ '^ 'i-- . ^SffSnS^SS :^d as Siksha Karmr Grade III on 1'eafter his prob&tion period starfe tsha^^Karmis (Recruitment And glierejn-after referrectto as"Rules, <as appointed as Shiksha Karmi, t-sextendable URtofiveyearsfor a Iprfull^prObatkMiperiocl. tlir^e years <rf Rrobatjon and it Ihas been extended further. Eive '1.3.2006. ThepetitCTierhasfiled 7 of Rules, 1997 has' not Jaeen ^eencQnfirmed after eompletion of beteri '•^ iat the employer should inform the ^ri exterKted for a further penod of >ias failed to o've notice before mthout passing eprifirmation ordel^ badin lavvanci'cohtrarytoRules. ofthe view ttiatcoritenttQn crfthe ^Rule 7 of Rutes, 1997 clearly ^fthreeyearsisextendable.upto 'a--.-": ' .:', [?ii^t^*a^i am XI-HC-22 SII^T'^i"^ 1+311^1 sft+-ii(*> •y%a Priya '^^TRB?%i»slwil<&,^ell*yi< :'':;;';':'' •®iT^^i|^:;s'l'::y/ ^IK'lftl St)*ll<B 2<to fiveyears.Extensionofperiodofpr4 notice is reqyired i before extenc|ii'^ Acc;ordingly,thecontentionofthepet 7 -lnviewpfthefoTegoihg,th[ep^1 No orderastocosts. ^ ./ cht^^'t<ffi;+ii+itil^ fe^ <Fg<'$i< ' 1:;.^7 sifsre'sn^f' ' . ibationisnotptihitivedssuchnoi the period of - •probation. itipnerjsrejeeted. ' titionisdismissed. • Sd/-. ': . SatistiK.Agnihotn Judge s~~~ ^S. ''lT: •;'\' y