Single Bench BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No3°^ / 2011 PETITIONERS •xCl ''y.a^ / ^i7 .^y '^&y ^,/^y ,*" ^\ ^"' «<^/ </y 1. Ku. Himansbu Dabar, D/o MahippJSingh Dabar @ M.S. Dabar, Aged aboutj.'^years, -(- 2.Ku. Smriti Dabar, D/o Mahipal Singh Dabar @ M.S. Dabar, Aged aboutl-5'years, •l/ 3. Sristhipal Singh Dabar, S/o Mahipal SinghDabar @ M.S. Dabar, Aged about i^ years, t/ 4. Trilokpal Singh Dabar S/o Mahipal Singh Dabar @ M.S. Dabar, Aged about 12.years, <^ RESPONDENTS ^ 5. Smt. Sarla Devi Dabar, W/o Mahipal Singh Dabar @ M.S. Dabar, Aged about46years, •t- All R/oVikasNagar, Kondagaon District Bastar, C.G. Petitioner No. 1 to 4 are minors therefore they are bei'ng represented by their natural guardlan and Father Mahipal Singh Dabar @ M.S. Dabar S/o Shri Parmal Singh, Aged about 45 years, Working as Sub Engineer at O/o EE, PIU No.3, PMGSY Surajpur, District Sarguja, C.G. R/o Vikas Nagar, Kondagaon District Bastar, C.G. VERSUS 1. Stateof Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of General Administration Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan , ^aipur (C.G.) 1 II 2. Commissioner, Department of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Development, Pt. Ravishakar Shukla University Campus Raipur, C.G. |i|i|f»iieUiOT ^ 3. Collector, District Bastar, Ipur, C.G. / " ' 4. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue ) Kondagaon, District Bastar, C.G. WRIT PETITIONUNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION Sshofe HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITiON (O N0. 3096 OF 2011 PETITiQNERS RESPQNDENTS Ku.l-limanshu Dabar&Others Versus State of Chhattisgar'n & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench: 1-fQn'ble.Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J— Present:- ShriSatyendraSahu.Advocateforthepetitioner. Shri V.V.S .iWoorthy, Dy. Advocate General for the Stgte. ORDER (QRAU (Passed 6nthis20th day of June, 2011) 1. LearnedcounselaDDearinafortheDetitJonerseeksoermissionofthis Court to withdraw this petitiori with liberty to file a fresh petition, if cause of action stiil survives. 2. Learned counse! appearing for other side has no objection. 3. |tis orderedas prayedfor. ' - 4. Accordingfv, the writ Detition is dismissecTas withdrawn with the above stated libertv. \~~~. Sdf- '.•.. SaEtish K. AgnihotrL Judge ".".-^^'.^-<'^ ^Ti'=a:--^-n-==S=='-teE;CT^SE.^S^ itjit(tliirartl!^Nmiaa—*—**""8*