IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15977 of 2011 MITHU YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.5.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Theft is said ornamental due to land dispute and co-accused Kapilmuni Dubey having allegation of snatching chain and cash is allowed bail by learned Sessions Judge, Rohtas. Land dispute is said behind filing of false case. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas in Complaint Case No. 569/09, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)