1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C.A.O. NO. 357/09 IN C.A. NO. 7894/08 IN MCA ST. NO. 20400/07 IN REJ. SECOND APPEAL NO. 859 OF 2007. Jose Thomas .vs. Ku. Samina Ali Muzammil Ali & others ________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders. Registrars orders. Mr. A.S. Jaiswal, Advocate for applicant. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATED : APRIL 4, 2009. Heard Mr. A.S. Jaiswal, learned Advocate for applicant. The learned Advocate submits that in spite of his best efforts, he was unable to serve respondent nos. 1, 3 & 4. The respondent nos. 2 & 5 are already served. The learned Advocate for the applicant further submits that if the applicant is permitted, he will serve respondent nos. 1, 3 & 4 through paper publication, i.e. in local newspaper daily 'Hitavada'. In view of the submissions made by the learned Advocate, the application is allowed. The applicant is permitted to serve the respondent nos. 1, 3 & 4 through substituted service returnable on 4.5.2009. The application is disposed of in above terms. J. JUDGE.