1 CA-728-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CVIL APPLICATION NO.728 OF 2010 in APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 699 OF 2008 Vasant Nagu Chavan (Vadar) & Ors. ... Applicants Vs. Atmaram Hanumant Chavan ... Respondent Mr. Abhishek Kandarkar i/b. S.G.Deshmukh,Advocates, for the applicants Mr. M.R.Kotikar,Advocate for the respondent No.1. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 13th September, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. A.O.No.699 of 2008 was filed by the original plaintiff No.2. The present applicants, who are the L.Rs. of original plaintiff No.1, were not available at the time of filing of the appeal and therefore they were shown as respondent Nos. 2A and 2B. As their interest with the plaintiff No.2 is common, they seek to bet transposed as appellant Nos. 2A and 2B. 3. In view of the facts and circumstances, the Application is allowed. The applicants Nos. 2A & 2B be transposed as appellants in the Appeal. Amendment be effected within two weeks. 2 CA-728-10.sxw Application stands disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)