In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-12822 of 2009 (O&M) Mohinder Singh ..... Petitioner vs State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. Ritu Punj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondents no. 1 to 3. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for respondents no. 4 to 6. Rajesh Bindal J. Reply filed on behalf of respondents no. 1 to 3 is taken on record. This is a petition for direction to official-respondents for registration of a case against the private respondents as per representations, Annexures P-3 and P4, filed by the petitioner with the Superintendent of Police, Karnal, and to hand over the investigation of the case to some higher or independent authorities. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner approached the Superintendent of Police, Karnal but no action has been initiated on the representations of the petitioner. Keeping in view the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and others 2008 (1) RCR (Criminal) 392 such a petition for direction to the police for investigation or registration of FIR could not be entertained as the petitioner has effective alternative remedy under Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and as such this Court would not like to interfere in the matter in its extra ordinary jurisdiction. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, with liberty to the petitioner to avail of his alternative remedy in accordance with law. 28.7.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge