IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU W.P. No.4064 of 1996 Between: R. Krishna S/o Narsaimha Hindu, age 42 years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o Plot No.64-A of VST Colony, Nacharam, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer Uppal (Mandal) Uppal, Ranga Reddy District 2 The Special Court Under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned judgment and Decree dated 17-11-1994 and made in L.G.C.No.4/1994 on the file of the Special Court under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act at Hyderabad, is null and void and contrary to law and also voilative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents herein not to give effect the same. Counsel for Petitioner: MR.V.SATYAM REDDY Counsel for Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent No.2: The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Sudershan Reddy) The question that arises for consideration in this writ petition is squarely covered by the decision rendered by us in W.P. No.6024 of 1995, dated 29-09- 2004. In fact both the writ petitions have been filed against the same judgment and decree, dated 17-11-1994, made in L.G.C. No.4 of 1994 on the file of the Special Court under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, at Hyderabad. For the aforesaid reasons, this writ petition is allowed in terms of the judgment rendered by us in W.P. No.6024 of 1995, dated 29-09-2004, without any order as to costs. The amount stated to have been deposited by the petitioner shall be refunded to him. ___________________________ B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J Date:04-10-2004. ___________________________ K.C. BHANU, J PV That Rule Nisi has been made absolute as above. Witness the Hon’ble Sri Devinder Gupta, the Chief Justice on this Monday the fourth day of October, two thousand and four. To 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer Uppal (Mandal), Uppal, Ranga Reddy District 2 The Presiding Officer, The Special Court Under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad 5. Two copies to G.P. for Revenue, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (O.U.T.). 6. Two C.Ds.