THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.19214 of 2006 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed against the order passed by the third respondent-society terminating the services of the petitioner. It is the contention of the petitioner that the respondents have illegally admitted the fourth respondent into service and passed the impugned order terminating the services of the petitioner on the ground of excess staff. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that the fourth respondent earlier filed W.P.No.23945 of 1998 and this Court by order dated 10.8.1999 dismissed the said writ petition by observing that the fourth respondent has to work out his remedies by invoking Section 61 of A.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 or by invoking jurisdiction of the authorities under A.P. Shops and Establishments Act, therefore, the fourth respondent ought not to have been admitted into service. The learned counsel appearing for respondents submits that the very writ petition is not maintainable and the order of this Court in W.P.No.23945 of 1998 dated 10.8.1999 is equally applicable to the case of the petitioner since the petitioner has questioned the termination of his services by the third respondent society. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed leaving liberty to the petitioner to work his remedies as available under law. It is needless to mention that the interim order granted earlier stood vacated automatically. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 26.2.2007 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.19214 of 2006 26.2.2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.19214 of 2006 Date: 26th February, 2006 Between: A.S.Premeswara Rao .. Petitioner And The District Cooperative Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari district & others. .. Respondents