BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28/06/2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN Writ Petition (MD) No.6896 of 2011 Y.Narayanan S/o.Yoga Subramaniyan :Petitioner -Vs- The District Manager, TASMAC, Madurai District, Manaloor, Ramanathapuram Main Road, Sivagangai District. :Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the tender notification dated 15.06.2011 published by the respondent in daily Dinamalar Newspaper dated 17.06.2011 in Na.Ka.No.1571/2011/E, insofar as in Shop No.5459 in Door No.3/284 Alanganallur and Palamedu Main Road, Sikkandar Chavadi Village, Madurai District and set aside the same and consequently conduct the re-tender by permitting the petitioner to participate in the tender process in accordance with law. For petitioner :Mr.L.Madhusudhanan For Respondents:Mr.K.Mahendran, Spl.Government Pleader ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 2.The petitioner has come with the present writ petition challenging the tender notification dated 15.06.2011 published by the respondent in daily newspaper dated 18.06.2011 insofar as Shop No. 5459 in Door No.3/284 Alanganallur and Palamedu Main Road, Sikkandar Chavadi Village, Madurai District and consequently conduct the re-tender by permitting the petitioner to participate in the tender process. 3.Mr.K.Mahendran, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing for the respondent reports that the tender has been confirmed in favour of the third party and hence, the remedy of the petitioner is only to challenge the same. 4.However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that since several formalities including the agreement has to be furnished by the concerned person, who take part in the auction, the respondent would not have confirmed the auction in favour of the third party. However, I am not inclined to accept the said contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, since it is reported that the auction has been held and it has been confirmed in favour of the third party. 5.In view of the above stated position, the Writ Petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to challenge the confirmation of sale in favour of the third party, if he chooses to do so. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar To: The District Manager, TASMAC, Madurai District, Manaloor, Ramanathapuram Main Road, Sivagangai District. RR W.P.(MD) No.6896 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 RP/20.07.2011/1P/2C. 28.06.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/