CW 2798/06 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2798/06 Rahupulla Khan Versus UOI & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 11/09/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. G.K. Garg, for petitioner Mr. Kunal Rawat, for respondents Instant petition has been filed by dependent/deceased government servant seeking compassionate appointment. His father was serving in clerical cadre who died while in service. Respondents have filed reply to the writ petition, but raised preliminary objection that the jurisdiction with regard to instant dispute which the petitioner raised in the instant petition lies under Central Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. After taking note of relevant provisions of the Act, 1985, counsel for petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail remedy available under law. However, so far as delay is concerned, it is always expected from the Tribunal to take note of the fact about pendency of writ petition in this court while examining application seeking condonation of delay. It is also expected from the Tribunal that if appeal is preferred, it may expeditiously dispose of the same looking to the fact that matter pertains to compassionate appointment. With the above observations, writ petition stands disposed of. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA2798CW06 11-9.doc