1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 918 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 2627 OF 1983 Kulbhushan Vishwanath Kapoor ........Plaintiff versus Smt. Rajrani Vishwanath Kapoor & ors........Defendants. Ms. Merchant i/b. H.C. Ganatra adv. for the Plaintiffs Mr. Tushar Bhawsar i/b.Kanga &Co. adv. for the Defendant no.5. CORAM: A. P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 20th APRIL, 2009. P.C.: 1. By filing the chamber summons, the plaintiff claims condonation of delay in filing the application and also prays for deletion of the name of defendant no.1 from the cause title of the plaint. It is stated by the learned counsel for the plaintiff that the L.Rs. of the defendant no.1 are already there on record as defendants and hence only deletion of the name of the defendant no.1 is sought. The learned counsel for defendant no.5 is present. He has no objection for allowing the chamber summons. Counsel for other defendants are absent. As the plaintiff is only seeking deletion of name of defendant no.1 the same is permitted. Chamber summons is made absolute and 2 disposed of. Despite service of summons, none of the defendants have filed written statement. Hence the suit to proceed ex-parte against the said defendants. To be listed for ex-parte decree. Plaintiff to place on record the original documents together with affidavit. (A. P. DESHPANDE, J.)