IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45294 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Shashi Kumar S/O Lalita Thakur @ Tapu Thakur Resident Of Village- Jagdishpur, P.S.- Jamhore, District- Aurangabad. 2. Daya Devi W/O Lalita Thakur @ Tapu Thakur Resident Of Village- Jagdishpur, P.S.- Jamhore, District- Aurangabad. 3. Lalita Thakur @ Tapu Thakur S/O Ramgati Thakur Resident Of Village- Jagdishpur, P.S.- Jamhore, District- Aurangabad. 4. Arun Kumar @ Arun Thakur S/O Lalita Thakur @ Tapu Thakur Resident Of Village- Jagdishpur, P.S.- Jamhore, District- Aurangabad. 5. Baliram Thakur S/O Vibhishan Thakur Resident Of Village- Beni, P.S.- Mali, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 2 13-02-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are named accused in this complaint case relating to negotiation of marriage of daughter of the complainant with petitioner no.1 and some advancement of cash in that connection but on ultimate failure of negotiation and refusal to make payment etc. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- ( Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial 2 Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad, in Complaint Case no.142 of 2011, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioners no.1, 3, 4, and 5 shall remain present on each and every date before the court below till disposal of the case. If the petitioners no.1, 3, 4 and 5 fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. A.Ahmad/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)