IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.32505 of 2010 GARIB NATH SAHANI @ PANCHU SAHANI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 23.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, to which Sections 396 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code was added later on. 15-20 miscreants after exploding bomb committed loot in the house of one Lakhindra Singh and in the occurrence Lakhindra Singh died. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been named in the confessional statement of one Khalil Mian, who has already been granted bail by this Court by order dated 25.05.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 11076 of 2010. Counsel for the State submits that one looted mobile of Fly Company was recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after five months. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)