BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighth day of March Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.S.RAMANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.2666 of 2011 R.MANI @ MANIKANDAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE THROUGH THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE VEERAVANALLUR POLICE STATION, AMBASAMUDRAM TALUK, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CR.NO.219 OF 2010. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.LAJAPATHI ROY Advocate For Respondent : MR.L.MURUGAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act in Crime No.219 of 2010 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is being apprehended on the basis of the confession given by the second accused as if the petitioner is also involved in the Crime No.219 of 2010 for the offence under Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the petitioner is the sixth accused and he has got one previous case wherein he was involved in a murder case. He also submitted that the person, who were arrested and from them gun powder was recovered and they were granted bail. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner's name does not find a place in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the F.I.R. and he was implicated in this case on the basis of the confession given by the second accused and also the co-accused were already released on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 08/03/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHERANMAHADEVI, TIRUNELVELI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 3 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE VEERAVANALLUR POLICE STATION, AMBASAMUDRAM TALUK, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. T.LAJAPATHI ROY Advocate SR.No.5503 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.2666 of 2011 Date :08/03/2011 PAM 09.03.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/