IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2009 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 RP.No. 1226 of 2009(H) -------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.30107/2005 Dated 05/11/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/ADDL.RESPONDENT No.6 IN THE W.P: ------------------------------------------------------------------- DR.P.SARASWATHY, PERUMPILAVIL, ARYA CENTRAL SCHOOL LANE, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY MR.V.JAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS 1 TO 3/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5 IN THE W.P.: ------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR. 2. THE COMPTROLLER, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR. 3. THE SENIOR DEPUTY COMPTROLLER, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR. 4. THE KERALA LOK AYUKTA, OFFICE OF THE KERALA LOK AYUKTA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. P.RAGHUNATHAN, LOTUS VILA, NAMAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. DR.G.PADMAKUMARI, TC 49/306, KAMALESWARAM, MANAKKADU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. RP.No. 1226/2009 ...2... 7. DR.O.ABDULREHIMANKUNJU, PUTHENVEEDU, KOTTUKULANGARA, KAYAMKULAM-690 502. 8. DR.G.BALAKRISHNA PILLA, AYSWARYA, PANAVILA JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. BY MR.K.P. MUJEEB, SC, FOR R1 TO R3. MR.D.KISHORE, ADVOCATE FRO R6 TO R8 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- Review Petition No.1226 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) No.30107 OF 2005 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2009. O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the parties in the writ petition takes notice for the respective parties in the review petition. Heard parties. 2. This review petition is at the instance of the additional 6th respondent seeking for a direction to consider the claim of the said review petitioner also in the light of the directions issued in favour of respondents 2 to 5 in the writ petition. The review petitioner retired from service on 01.06.2005. In the light of the directions issued by this Court to consider the case and to grant eligible benefits to respondents 2 to 5 in terms of Exhibits P6 to P9 orders passed by the Lok Ayukta, the respondents 1 to 3 will consider the claim of the review petitioner also for grant of any eligible benefits in terms of the said orders and appropriate communications will be issued to the review R.P.No.1226/2009 2 petitioner in this regard while considering the claims of those who are covered by the directions issued in the judgment. The operative portion of the judgment stands modified to that extent. This review petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp