IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9710 of 2009 1. ARJUN MANDAL, son of Late Binori Mandal 2. Bhairo Mandal, son of Dhori Mandal 3. Pagal Mandal, son of Late Moti Mandal @ Govind Mandal All resident of village Shair Mari, P.S. Kursela, Dist Katihar Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 27.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a complaint case registered for the offence under Sections 448, 376, 511, 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they and the complainant, appreciating the nature of the allegation and the fact that no offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code was made out, have settled the dispute outside the court, which fact can be verified when the petitioners will appear along with the complainant, Rekha Devi and her husband in the court below on the next date fixed to consider the compromise petition, which was filed on 28.1.2009 as is evident from Annexure-3 to this application or within four weeks from today. Let the petitioners, Arjun Mandal, Bhairo Mandal and Pagal Mandal together with the complainant and her husband appear on the next date fixed or within four weeks from today and if the complainant and her husband support the compromise petition, Annexure-3, then petitioners be admitted to the privilege of bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rs. Five thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of the C.J.M., Katihar in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No. 144 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioners. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)