1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. L.P.A. NO.171 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.905 OF 2008 Dajiba s/o Vithoiba, died, L.Rs. Vithal Dajiba Bhange & ors. ..APPELLANTS VERSUS Shaikh Noor s/o Shaikh Imam, died, L.Rs. Shaikh Jafar Shaikh Noor & ors ..RESPONDENTS Mr Uday S. Malte, Advocate for the appellants. Mr R.R. Shaikh, Advocate for respondents no.1a(1) to 1 a (7) & 3 CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND N.D. DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE : 14th June, 2010 PER COURT : This Letters Patent Appeal has been filed against the order of the learned Single Judge, dated 4.3.2009 in Writ Petition No.905 of 2008 dismissing the petition, namely Writ Petition No.905 of 2008, which had been filed by the present appellants challenging the order passed by the appellate Court below Exh.28 in Regular Civil Appeal No.159 of 1981 permitting the respondents herein to amend the plaint. The learned Single Judge of this Court has found that no case was made out by the appellants herein for challenging the aforesaid order. The learned Single Judge further came to the conclusion that no case was made out for interference in the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 2 of the Constitution of India. Pursuant to the order of the appellate Court, the amendment had already been carried out and the present appellants had also sought for making consequential amendment to the written statement which had been allowed and the present appellants had carried out the consequential amendment. 2. We have heard Shri Malte, learned Counsel for the appellants and Shri R.R. Shaikh, learned Counsel for respondents. With the assistance of the learned Counsel for the parties we have perused the order of the learned Single Judge. According to us no case for interference is made out by the appellants. Consequently, this Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed summarily with no order as to costs. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) amj/lpa171.10