IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10559 of 2011 Krishna Das son of Late Gopi Nath Agrawal, resident of Mohalla Anand Bhawan, Near Kali Mandir, University Road, Sarai, Police Station- Kotwali, District Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Secretary, Higher Education, Department of Human Resources and Development, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur through its Vice Chancellor. 4. The Vice Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 5. The Registrar, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 6. The Finance Officer, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 7. The Principal, T.N.B. College, Bhagalpur. ... ... Respondents. ----------- 2. 8.7.2011. Heard Mr. Abdul Mannan Khan, who was assisted by Mr. Suman Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Krishna Chandra, learned A.C. to learned Advocate General, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2/State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents/Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University. The petitioner, who retired on 31.1.2006 as Accountant from T.N.B. College under Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, has prayed for directing the respondents to revise his pension as well as for granting 50% merger of Dearness relief on his basic 2 pension. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been settled in number of cases. He has specifically relied on an order passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No.3616 of 2010 (Dr. Himanshu Bhushan Vs. Tilkamanjhi Bhagalpur University and others) and other connected writ petitions disposed of on 3.12.2010 and submits that the writ petition may be disposed of in the light of order passed by this Court. Shri Ashok Kumar Keshri, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/University does not dispute the fact that issue involved in the case has already been settled by this Court. In view of the facts and circumstances and stand taken by the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of in terms of order passed in Dr. Himanshu Bhushan’s case (Supra). The court expects that after receipt of requisition from the University for allocation of fund for making payment in the light of order of 3 this Court in favour of the petitioner, the State authority will take all steps so that fund may be allocated without any delay. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)