IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3900 of 1991 Date of decision:28.04.2009 Dalip and others ...Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr. C.B.Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Deepak Girotra, AAG, Haryana. ----- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. The revision is against the concurrent orders of the Senior Sub Judge, Sonepat and the Additional District Judge, Sonepat accepting the contention of the defendant that the Civil Court had no jurisdiction and directing the matter to be decided before the appropriate authority constituted under Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950. While so holding, the Courts dealt with the fact that the Well in dispute, was in possession of Gram Panchayat and that it was revealed from the jamabandi of 1960-61 (Ex.P-3) and in jamabandi that the Well in dispute, was owned and possessed by Custodian. The Court therefore found that under Section 36 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Civil Revision No.3900 of 1991 - 2 - Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 and by virtue of Section 46 of Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, the Civil Court has no jurisdiction. 2. The decisions of the two Courts below accord with the provisions of the law and I am not compelled to take any different view. The order of the Trial Court directing return of the plaint on the ground that the Court had no jurisdiction and as affirmed by the Appellate Court are, under the circumstances, perfectly justified. 3. The civil revision is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 28.04.2009 sanjeev