IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 8TH ASWINA 1931 RP.No. 73 of 2001(H) -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.21494/1999 Dated 03/07/2000 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- C.N.RAJAN, S/O.CHENTHIL PERUMAL, AGED 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT T.C. 2/225, PATTAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV. SRI.G.SUKUMARA MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A&E), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI MUHAMOOD T.T THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ R.P. No.73/2001-H ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 30th day of September, 2009 O R D E R This review petition is filed by the petitioner pointing out that the observation contained in the judgment in O.P.No.21494/1999 dated 03/07/2000, that “the amount towards balance D.C.R.G has been released” is not correct as no amount was paid to the petitioner out of Rs.25,419/-. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. If any further amount is due, the observation contained in the judgment will not stand in the way of the competent authority from disbursing the said amount. If the petitioner approaches the competent authority, the said authority will consider the issue and disburse any further amount due to the petitioner within a reasonable time. The review petition is accordingly disposed of. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms