IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27499 of 2010 SATENDRA PRASAD & ANR. Versus STATE OF BIHAR. ----------- 02/ 28.07.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the State. This application has been filed for modification of the order dated 24.6.2010 granting bail to the petitioners in Criminal Misc. No. 19874 of 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the application in so far as the petitioner no. 2, Hari Bhushan Sah is concerned, but seeks modification in so far as it relates to petitioner no. 1, Satendra Prasad. The modification prayed in this application is in context with the condition stipulated in the bail order requiring the father of the petitioners to stand as one of the bailors and who would be under a duty to inform the court below if the petitioners are named or get involved in any other case of similar nature after their release and whereupon, the court concerned would initiate proceedings for cancellation of bail bonds of the defaulting petitioner(s) for taking them into custody. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that although he had mentioned in the cause title of the main application that the father of petitioner no. 1 was not alive but the same could not be pointed out at the time of passing of the 2 order dated 24.6.2010 leading to the present modification. Having regard to the circumstances set forth, the condition set out in the order dated 24.6.2010 granting bail to the petitioners is modified only to the extent of petitioner no. 1, Satendra Prasad, in whose case, one of the bailor would be a close relative who would file an affidavit indicating his genealogy with the said petitioner and would be under a duty to inform the court below if the petitioner Satendra Prasad is named or gets involved in any other case of similar nature after his release and whereupon the court concerned would initiate proceedings for cancellation of his bail bonds and for taking him into custody. The aforesaid modification of the condition is only in context with the petitioner no. 1, Satendra Prasad. The condition present in the order dated 24.6.2010 would continue to operate in the case of petitioner no. 2, Hari Bhushan Sah. The order dated 24.6.2010 is modified to the aforesaid extent. The application is disposed of. Let the order be communicated to the court concerned by FAX at the expense of the petitioner. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)