1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. SECOND APPEAL NO.222 OF 1999 . SECOND APPEAL NO.222 OF 1999 . SECOND APPEAL NO.222 OF 1999 . Shri Dudhnath Ramdhar Kevath : Appellant. versus Shri Ramdhari Deonarayan Dube : Respondent. Mr.N.P.Deshpande for the appellant. Smt.A.A.Agarwal for the respondent. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 7th July 2005. DATED : 7th July 2005. DATED : 7th July 2005. ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER 1. Heard the advocates for the appellant and respondent. Appellant is the original plaintiff. His suit for possession was dismissed. His appeal was also dismissed. The issue was on the facts pleaded and it was, whether the plaintiff can prove that he was in possession and he was dispossessed and, whether he was entitled to possession. There is absolutely no evidence. 2 2 2 Both the courts have properly scanned and scrutinised the evidence. No substantial question of law is involved. Hence this appeal is dismissed. [D.G.DESHPANDE] [D.G.DESHPANDE] [D.G.DESHPANDE]