x 'vr COURT OFCHHATnSQARH AT BILASPUR SiiifljeBejich : Hon'bie Shri DJijDRaosahebCteshmykh,J. ^) fi^^C) 3 2^(5/@& M.A.fQPR No.3141/2«)7 AppeSjarit Defendant No,3 The Oriental tnsura.nce Company through the Divisionat Manager, Division Office, Geetanjali Bhawan, Main Road, Kortoa, Distt. Korba (C.G.) Respojiderit Ctalmant Respondent Defendant No.1 Respondent 1. 2. 3. versus Shri Rajkumar, agej about 25 years, S/o' Shri Mithu, R/o Gadhiras, P.S. Gadhiras, Tahsii - Konta, Distt. Dantewada (C.G.) Shri Sonadhar, agaj about 23 years, S/o Shri Sitaram, -Driver- Shri Hirendra Si'ngh, sged about 25 years, S/o Shri A.K.Singh -OWNER- Both respondents No.2 & 3 are residents of Gadhiras, Tahsi)0 Konta, Dietriot - Dantewada (C.G.) ynder 173 Act, Present: Shri Ajay Mishra for the appeflant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 4t" ofMarch, 2008) The appeal was fited on 12.10.07. The foiiowing defauit was notioed 01. Proof of statutory' deposit as required by the first proviso to Section 173 (1) has not been furnished. Learned counsei for the appeilant sought 4weeks} time on 16.10.2007 for removjng the defaujt and agaln sought 4 weeks' time on 11.01.2008 to remove the default, He submitted that default, as polnted out by the offioe, has not removed so far. jn vlew of the fact that proof of statutory deposit as required by the first provlso to Section 173 (1) ^f the Motor Vehicles Aot has not been furnished so far, the js dismissed for non compiianco,- Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge BIBHUTI PRASAD Digitally signed by BIBHUTI PRASAD Date: 2025.02.05 10:18:23 +0530