1 cas1039 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1039 OF 2004 IN SECOND APPEAL ST.NO.30440 OF 2002 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.Suresh Dubey h/f Mr.J.S.Kini for the Applicant None for the respondents CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 17,2011 P.C.: 1 The second respondent is served. None appears for the second respondent. The application already stands abated as against the respondent nos.1 and 3. Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2 It is clarified that even the appeal also stands abated as against the respondent nos.1 and 3. The effect of abatement of the appeal as against the respondent nos.1 and 3 shall be considered at the time of hearing the appeal for admission. JUDGE