IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 9684 of 2008 Between: 1 S.K.M.Junior College, rep by its Secretary & Correspondent Dr.B.Dwarakanath Swaroop S/o. Sri Gopalaswamy R/o.Kadapa, Siddavattam, Kadapa. 2 Sri Saraswathi Vidyalayam Junior College, Sankarapuram, Kadapa rep. by its Correspondent Dr.B.Dwarakanath Swaroop S/o.Sri Gopalaswamy Age 35 years, R/o. Kadapa. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary (Higher Education), Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Intermediate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 The Regional Joint Director of Intermediate Education, Kadapa. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in disposing the appeal dated 6.2.2008 questioning the G.O.Rt.No.1039 Higher Education (IE-II) Department dated 27.12.2007 as arbitrary, illegal, void, violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the appeal. Counsel for the Petitioners: DR.P.B.VIJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following ORDER: HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No.9684 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the first respondent in considering the petitioners’ appeal, dated 06.02.2008 preferred against the order in G.O.Rt.No.1039, dated 27.12.2007. As could be seen from the material on record, having entertained the petitioners’ appeal, the first respondent by Memo, dated 18.02.2008, called upon the Commissioner of Intermediate Education to furnish his remarks together with connected records. In the circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioners’ appeal in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. _____________ G.Rohini, J Dt.15.06.2009 VGB