{1} caal-53-10.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION (L) NO.53 OF 2010 IN COMPANY APPEAL (L) NO.51 OF 2010 WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.40 OF 2010 IN COMPANY APPEAL (L) NO.43 OF 2010 ABC Farms Pvt Ltd & Ors .. Applicant versus Darayus A. Bathena .. Respondent ALONGWITH COMPANY APPLIATION NO.41 OF 2010 IN COMPANY APPEAL (L) NO.44 OF 2010 WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO.52 OF 2010 IN COMPANY APPEAL (L) NO.49 OF 2010 ABC Farms Pvt Ltd & Ors .. Applicant versus Farhad Kersi Chinoy & Anr .. Respondents Ms.Nafisa Hamid a/w Zohra Kutarwadli i/by Khaitan & Jayakar for the appellants. Ms.S.P.Nanavati for the respondents. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 15th December 2011. P.C.: . These appeals and connected applications are placed for hearing, but as {2} caal-53-10.doc had been stated before the Court earlier, the parties being closely related to each other, were attempting an over all settlement. Now, it is reported that not only the dispute in the present proceedings, but some other proceedings are covered by a Family Settlement Agreement dated 14th December 2011. In terms of these broad settlements, it is agreed that all proceedings shall come to an end in the manner stated therein. 2} The Family Settlement Agreement and based thereon, the consent of parties to dispose of the proceedings are placed on record and it is requested that an order be made in terms of the consent terms. 3} It is stated that all signatories to these terms are present in this Court. They have perused the terms. They confirm the arrangement and agreement between the parties. They are agreeable that the terms be taken on record and all proceedings be terminated and closed in the light of their consent and agreement. They stated that the Family Settlement Agreement which is appended to these terms is also confirmed by them and they are parties thereto. 4} In the light of the Family Settlement Agreement and the consent terms placed before me, I am satisfied that the disputes between the family members {3} caal-53-10.doc have come to an end amicably. There is no impediment in disposing of these proceedings by taking the terms on record as they do not contravene the provisions of law or public policy. The consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” collectively for identification. There will be an order in terms of the consent terms. All proceedings mentioned in the clauses of these consent terms stand disposed off accordingly. No order as to costs. Interim and ad- interim orders, if any, to stand vacated. 5} It is stated that there is a Arbitration Petition between same parties being Arbitration Petition No.91 of 2011. Brother S.J.Vazifdar, J for some reasons is unable to take up the said arbitration petition and he has removed it from board. The consent terms duly signed by the parties confirming their agreements as recorded in Family Settlement Agreement, is confirmed in this petition as well. The terms to that effect reduced in writing duly signed by the advocates are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The arbitration petition is also disposed of accordingly. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)