1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Misc. Civil Application ( Review) No. 377/2007 in W.P.1762/99(D) Ku. Karuna Hanumantrao Naidu..vs.. State of Mah. & others. Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Courts or Judge's Orders. Shri V. R. Chaudhari, Advocate for petitioners. Shri Ahirkar, AGP for respondent No.1. CORAM : A. B. CHAUDHARI, J. Dated : 21/09/2007 The review of judgment and order dated 3rd September, 2002 is sought by the learned counsel for the review petitioner. Having heard Mr. Chaudhari, learned counsel for the review petitioner and having seen the impugned order, it appears that the contentions raised by the petitioner that the old documents filed by the petitioner are of pre- constitutional period ought to have been considered by the Scrutiny Committee as well as by the learned Single Judge of this Court, did not appeal to this Court. In my opinion, this sole ground is not enough 2 for review of the judgment and order passed by this Court. Hence, the review petition is dismissed. JUDGE JSA.