IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 19870 of 2008 Between: Karipaka Ramanaiah S/o. Krishnaiah R/o. Polamrajugunta Vg., Muthukur Mandal, Sri Potti Sriramulu , Nellore District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Nellore Sri Potti Sriramulu, Nellore District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nellore, Sri Potti Sriramulu, Nellore District. 3 The Tahsildar, Muthukur, Sri Potti Sriramulu, Nellore District. 4 Sanna Reddy Venkata Subba Reddy S/o. Janaki Rami Reddy R/o. Polamrajugunta Vg., Muthukur mandal, Sri Potti Sriramulu,Nellore District. 5 Eepuru Srinivasula S/o. Narasa Reddy R/o. Polamrajugunta Vg., Muthukur mandal, Sri Potti Sriramulu,Nellore District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate writ order or direction more in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to dispose of the Representation dt. 26-6-2008 made by the petitioner through Sri R. Siva Sankar Rao, Advocate, Nellore-1 and pass such further or other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.NAGA RAGHU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner claims to be the owner and possessor of land in an extent of Ac.4.26 cents situated in Sy.No.556 and an extent of Ac.1.74 cents in Sy.No.553 of Pottempadu Revenue, Survepalli Bit-5. His grievance is that respondents 4 and 5 herein, who are having lands in Sy.Nos.553 and 554, totally admeasuring Ac.9.00, situated on the southern side of their lands, have converted their lands into ponds and are doing aqua culture by using salt water and chemicals, which is aﬀecting his lands where he is raising paddy crops and, therefore, he issued a legal notice to them and in spite of the same, as they have not stopped aqua culture in the lands, he made a representation on 26.6.2008 to respondents 1 to 3 requesting them to remove the aqua ponds but so far no action has been taken by the respondents. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and at their request the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. Since the petitioner has already made a representation to the authorities bringing to their notice his grievance, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that instead of this Court going into the merits of the matter, the authorities may be directed to dispose of the same for which course of action, the learned counsel for the petitoner also agreed. In the circumstances, respondents 1 to 3 are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner and take necessary action expeditiously after issuing notice to the affected parties. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. N.V.RAMANA,J Dt.12.9.2008 msv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The District Collector, Nellore Sri Potti Sriramulu, Nellore District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nellore, Sri Potti Sriramulu, Nellore District. 3 The Tahsildar, Muthukur, Sri Potti Sriramulu, Nellore District. 4 2CCs to Govt.Pleader for Revenue, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad. 5 2CD copies