lt • s'Tsgf®Ben^b f"'~1 (O (7 ' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0. ^ f DS' /2011 PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ Triyugi Tiwari, S/o. Late Shri Rajkishore Tiwari, Aged about 54 ycars, Peon, Posted at Pashupatipur High School, Wadra&iagar, District-Siu-guja (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Departiaent of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Assistaat Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Ambikapur, Surguja (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Wadrafaagar, District-Surguja (C.G.) ^4. CoUector, (Tribal Welfare) Ambikapur, District-Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ,-f /-2. ^- .^%;0 fy' .•\^ ^\.-.--' \v .^:' fri. ' '%• j<l '•^Si"—-;<(^^ '^^ \-3/^ ^•^ ^' -••. '•<teuE ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPVR SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRJTINKER DIWAK@i PBTITIONBRS RBSPONDBNTS W.P.fSi.NO. 6105/2011 Triyugi Tiwari versus StateofC.G. 8s Others Shri Chanderesh Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Praveen Das, Dy.G.A. for the State. WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICfcE 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDBR (14.10.2011) Grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that though he is entitled for being regularized as Assistant Grade III but till date his case has not been considered and his representation, made pursuant to the order passed by this Court has not been decided. Counsel for the petitioner submits that purpose of Eling this petition would be served if direction is issued to the resp. No.2 to decide the pending representation of the petitioner within time frame. State counsel submits that the petitioner made representation in the year 2009 and has approached this Court almost after two years and in the facts and circumstances of the case, he be directed to make fresh representation detailing hia claim and in tum the respondent No.2 will decide the same in accordance with law. The present petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a detailed representation within two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and in tum the resp. No.2 shall decide the same as expeditiously as possible preferable within a period of three months from the date of its receipt. [t is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the 'merits of the case and the authority concemed would be at liberty to deeide the representation strictly in accordance with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker - .Judge