§ i I J l 1 HIGH COURT OF DIVISIon CHHATTISGARH Bench AT BilLASPUR 1 ‘ (Writ Appeal u/S 2(1) of the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to DiViSion Bench)Act 2006 . l Present é Shri T»K Tiwari counselforthe appellant vSt‘ri A S Kachhawaha Deputy Advocate General for respondents No and 2/State Dr N l< Shukla Sr Advocate With Shri Shaindr hk ounsl or respondent No 3 ix v ORAL‘ ORDER (Passed on 07~O3—201 it) , l i Per Dhirerirlra Mighra .l_ > i i 1. Dr N K Sh‘ukla learne Sr “Advcate with Shri Shailendra Shukla learned counsel for the respondent No 3 submits that the instant writ appeal is not maintainable in View of dictum of Supreme Court in the .matter of Ku Madhurl Patrl & another vs Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development & others reported in (1994) 6 * SCC 241 He further submits that the only remedy available to the appellant is approaching Supreme Court by way of filing Special Leave v ‘r. ' " Petio rticle 36 f Costiutin of India. Rferee is me tin under A 1 o nto enc ad 1 lea Sula ce f d O .Cor'am: Hon’ ble Shru Dhlrendra Mishra, & ‘ Hon’ ble Shri,R.N. Chandrakar, JJ Writ Appeal No. 88 of 2011 Appellant _ ‘ Deepak Khapekar, V‘s/o. Shriwan Petitioner Khapekar, aged about 41 years, r/o. 4-A/Str, 52/Sector-8, Bhi!ai, Durg (CG). Vs. Responden‘fs State of Chhattis‘garh through the Secretary, General Administration Department, D.K.Si Bhawan, Raipur (CG) / High Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny ' Committee through Member and Jomt Director Pt Deendayal Upadhyaya Nagar Sector-4 Raipur(CG) Bhilai Steel Plant, through Managing Director, Ispat .BhaWan, Bhilai, Durg (CG). i I ‘ \ ‘ para 13 of the aforesaid to Ethe direction contained in sub para 13 of judgment. In ‘view of the above submission made by> learned counsei for the reSpondent No.3, Shri T.K. Til/Y ri, elarnedibounSel for the appellant seeks to withdraw this appeal‘by fiiing S.L.P.‘ before the Supreme Cou‘rt. Accordingly, the instant writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn Sd/- Dhirendra MiShl‘a l l Sdl- i 1 J \RANGANATH CHANDRAKAR Jue w . ‘ \f dg