Crl. Misc. No.M-18602 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-18602 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 24, 2010 Suresh Kumar …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Rakesh Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner through instant petition has invoked the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and sought a direction to S.P., Ambala, to take suitable action against respondents no.3 and 4 on the written complaint, annexure P-1 alleging that the said complaint discloses cognizable offences which have been committed by the private respondents. Crl. Misc. No.M-18602 of 2010 [2] On notice issued to the State, a reply has been filed to the effect that the allegations in annexure P-1 have enquired into. The enquiry report prepared by the police has been placed on record as annexure R-1. During enquiry, it has been found that the petitioner had a love marriage with respondent Madhu. On account of certain differences she had filed a divorce petition against the petitioner which is pending in the Court on September 24, 2010. It was also found by the police that Madhu was not residing with Dr.Arvind Sambhar, as alleged by the petitioner. In view of the allegations of the petitioner having already been enquired into, no further direction is required to be given by this Court. This petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to avail any other remedy available to him in accordance with law. September 24, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE