IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.581 of 2008 KAMARUDDIN MIAN Versus SAMEENA KHATOON ----------- 2 18.09.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, the amount of Rs. 1000/- per month by way of maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be said to be either excessive or illegal. The relationship of husband and wife being admitted, the quantum of Rs. 1000/- per month cannot be said so exorbitant so as to be interfered by this Court in its revisional exercise of power under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. As a matter of fact no evidence to this effect which was within the exclusive knowledge of the petitioner pertaining to his income, was led to establish that his income was Rs. 50/- to 60/- per day and as such the findings of the Court below is with regard to the income of the petitioner cannot be said to perverse or illegal. That being so, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order and accordingly, this Civil Revision application is dismissed with a direction to the petitioner to pay both arrears and current amount within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order to his wife, opposite party failing which the Court below will be entitled to take appropriate coercive action against the petitioner. With the aforesaid observations and directions this Civil Revision application is dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)