IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3635 of 2010 1. GAYA RAI 2. SUNIL RAI @ SUNIL KUMAR RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 01.02.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioners have approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse sections including section 452 IPC. It is contended that the police upon conclusion of investigation, did not find any material justifying implication of the petitioners and, as such, they were not sent up for trial. One of the co-accused named in the FIR, of course, sent up for trial. It is next contended that the learned CJM subsequently differed with the police report and has taken cognizance and hence the apprehension. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners abovenamed, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Muzaffarpur in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 210/2007(G.R.No.2436/07/Tr.No.1652/2009) subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )