C-482 No. 973 of 2009 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate present for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. By means of this petition, moved under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 16.09.2009, passed by Sessions Judge, Pauri Garhwal, in Criminal Revision No. 26 of 2008, Deepak Kumar Vs. State and another. Brief facts of the case are that an application under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. was filed by the complainant (present petitioner) against Deepak Kumar (respondent No. 2), a Drug Inspector, alleging that on 06.07.2006, he came to the clinic of the complainant and his wife, and demanded illegal gratification. It appears that on said application the police was directed to register the case. The police investigated the matter and found that the complaint was not true. A final report was submitted by the police. On this, the complainant filed a protest petition. Considering protest petition as complaint, the Magistrate issued summoning order against Deepak Kumar (present respondent No. 2). Against said order Deepak Kumar filed a Criminal Revision No. 26 of 2008, before the Sessions Judge, Pauri Garhwal. Learned Sessions Judge, Pauri Garhwal, vide impugned order came to the conclusion that the allegation made against Deepak Kumar, even if taken to be true, the Magistrate had no jurisdiction to take cognizance in the matter in view of the provisions contained in Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through the impugned order, this Court does not find any jurisdictional or other error of law committed by learned Sessions Judge, in passing the impugned order. Therefore, this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is dismissed summarily. (P.C. P., J.) 18.12.2009 HN