IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 17347 of 2008 Between: M. Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Raghavaiah, R/o. Dwaraka Tirumala Village, Dwaraka Tirumala Mandal, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Endowments) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Eluru, West Godavari District. 3 The Tahsildar, (Mandal Revenue Officer), Dwaraka Tirumala Mandal, Dwaraka Tirumala, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction the action of the respondents in proceedings with the Land Acquisition proceedings pursuant to the Notification published in GO Ms.No. 477/2007 Rev. (Endts 4) Dept. Dt. 13-4-2007 issued by the 1st Respondent herein Under Section 4 (1) of the land Acquisition Act and Declaration in Memo No. 26524/Endowment IV (2)/2006-3 Revenue Endts.IV Dept. dated 18-3-2008 published in Hindu Daily on 29-4-2008 issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act by the 1st respondent for acquisition of the land, admeasuring Ac. 3.55 cents situated in Sy,No. 58/1 of Dwaraka Tirumala Village, Dwaraka Tirumala Mandal, West Godavari District belonging to the petitioner herein as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, null and void, unreasonable, impermissible and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.V.SESHA SAI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 17347 of 2008 O R D E R: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 23-12-2008 KLP