1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.08.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.(MD).Nos.9551 to 9557 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1,1,1,1,1,1 and 1 of 2011 K.Murugan : Petitioner in W.P.(MD)Nos.9551 to 9556/2011 S.Nagarajan : Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.9557/2011 Vs. The Tashildhar/Assistant District Manager, (in-charge of the District Manager), TASMAC Ltd., Big Project Complex, Ramanathapuram, Pin-623 503. : Respondent in all W.Ps. COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to issue tender schedule application forms immediately for the bars at the TASMAC Shop Nos.6808, 6811, 6813, 6814, 6938, 6940 and 6807 to the petitioners respectively. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Ramadurai For Respondent : Mr.M.Muniasamy Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER The petitioners have sought for a Mandamus, directing the respondent to issue tender schedule applications in respect of the bars attached to TASMAS Shop Nos.6808, 6811, 6813, 6814, 6938, 6940 and 6807, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District, respectively. 2. It is the case of the petitioners that pursuant to the notification dated 09.08.2011, they submitted applications for issuance of tender schedule forms along with the prescribed fee of Rs.525/- by way of demand drafts drawn in the name of the District Manager, TASMAC, Ramanathapuram District. The request of the petitioners has not been considered so far and, hence, they sent representations dated 23.08.2011 to the respondent to issue tender forms. Contending inter alia that there is a failure to discharge the duties, as per the Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Rules, 2000, the petitioners have come forward with the present Writ Petitions for the reliefs stated supra. 3. Considering the limited relief, Mr.M.Muniasamy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the TASMAC was put on notice. He denied the allegations levelled against the Assistant District Manager, TASMAC, Ramanathapuram, the respondent herein. However, he submitted that the tender schedule application would be issued, on receipt of necessary application with the prescribed fee. The submission of the learned Standing Counsel is placed on record. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. In view of the above, a direction is issued to the Tahsildar/Assistant District Manager, (in-charge of the District Manager), TASMAC Limited, Ramanathapuram, the respondent herein to issue the tender schedule applications to the petitioners for the bars attached to TASMAC Shop Nos..6808, 6811, 6813, 6814, 6938, 6940 and 6807, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District, respectively. Mr.M.Muniasamy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the TASMAC also submitted that he will communicate a copy of the order passed by this Court to the respondent, so as to enable the respondent to comply with the directions issued by this Court. 5. The Writ Petitions stand ordered accordingly. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Writs) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(C.S) To The Tashildhar/Assistant District Manager, (in-charge of the District Manager), TASMAC Ltd., Big Project Complex, Ramanathapuram, Pin-623 503. +2. CCs to Mr.R.Ramadurai, Advocate, SR.No. 28801 & 28802 SML Common Order made in W.P.(MD).Nos.9551 to 9557 of 2011 24.08.2011 TR : 24.08.2011: 2p/4c : IT https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/