IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-6500 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: May 03, 2011 Somvir …..Petitioner versus State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.K.S. Malik-I, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Haryana .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) This is a petition under section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in a case registered against the petitioner under sections 392/395 IPC vide FIR No.119 dated 2.4.2010 at police station Sadar Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been arraigned as an accused on the basis of statement of co-accused and he is in custody since 27.4.2010. He submits that trial may take a long time to conclude, petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Learned State counsel (on instructions from ASI- Umesh Kumar, who is present in court) has opposed the prayer for bail. He submits that prosecution is yet to lead evidence, petitioner is also involved in two other cases of similar nature and he is in custody in another case. He further submits that petitioner was brought on production Crl.Misc.No.M-6500 of 2011 - 2 - warrants from Rohtak Jail during the proceedings of this case. Heard. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case particularly involvement of the petitioner in another case of similar nature, I am of the considered view that petitioner is not entitled to be enlarged on bail at this stage. Petitioner shall, however, be at liberty to file afresh after some prosecution evidence is led before the trial court. Dismissed. May 03, 2011 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE