gst 1 ao1445.2010.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1445 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1789 OF 2010. Badrinarayan Madanlal Dangra ..... ...... ..Appellant. V/s Kamal Madanlal Dangra & Ors. ... ..... ..Respondents. Mr.S.R.Dube, Adv. for the appellant. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. 25th Jan., 2011. PC: By way of present appeal the appellant challenges the order dated 2.4.2009 vide which the application filed by the present appellant for restoration of physical possession to the plaintiff came to be rejected. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that initially an order of status quo was granted by the learned trial Court and during pendency of the said injunction order though the plaintiff was put in possession he was dispossessed and as such the application was filed by the plaintiff for restoration of possession. 3. Learned trial Court by the impugned order has observed that when the order of status quo was passed it was not clear as to who was in actual possession. In that view of the matter learned trial Court found that the prayer made in the application cannot be granted. 4. No error can be found in the approach adopted by the learned trial Court to warrant interference. Hence appeal stands dismissed.\ 5. In view of dismissal of appeal, Civil Application No.1789/10 does not survive and the same also stands disposed of.