1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1851 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1640 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income-tax Central II .. .. Applicant vs. M/s.Aatur Holding Pvt. Ltd. .. .. Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1852 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1641 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income-tax Central II .. .. Applicant vs. M/s.Aatur Holding Pvt. Ltd. .. .. Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1853 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1642 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income-tax Central II .. .. Applicant vs. M/s.Aatur Holding Pvt. Ltd. .. .. Respondent WITH 2 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1854 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1966 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income-tax Central II .. .. Applicant vs. M/s.Harsh Estate Pvt. Ltd. .. .. Respondent WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1855 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1967 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income-tax Central II .. .. Applicant vs. M/s.Harsh Estate Pvt. Ltd. .. .. Respondent Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for Applcant. Mr.A.K. Jasani for Respondents. ---- CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 19th JUNE, 2009 P.C.: 1.Heard rival parties. Perused the Notices of Motion. For the reasons stated in the respective Affidavits, delay is condoned in all the above Motions. All the Motions are 3 made absolute in terms of prayer (a). 2. Registry is directed to register the Appeals. All office objections are waived. By consent of parties, all the Appeals are taken up for hearing. All the parties agree that issue sought to be raised in the Appeals is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Aatur Holdings P. Ltd., [2008] 302 ITR 92 (Bom). In this view of the matter, all the Appeals are dismissed in limine. No order as to costs. [J.P. DEVADHAR, J.] [V.C. DAGA, J.]