IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 20TH MAY 2011 / 30TH VAISAKHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 3739 of 2011() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.845 OF 2011 OF KOTTARAKARA POLICE STATION PETITIONER/ACCUSED -------------------------------------- PREMAJA, W/O.RAJASEKHARAN, NEDIYAVILA VEEDU, KARICHAL, PLLICKAL P.O., KOTTARAKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE(PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL) SRI.A.R.DILEEP RESPONDENT(S): STATE AND COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSEUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTTARAKKARA POLICE STATION, KOTTARAKKARA. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.S.U.NAZER THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. ---------------------------------------------- B.A.No.3739 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of May, 2011 O R D E R Petitioner is the accused in Crime No. 845 of 2011 of Kottarakara Police Station. It was registered under Sections 324 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code. This application is for pre- arrest bail. It is alleged that the petitioner trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and beat her with a stick. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor and also gone through the available records. Considering all the aspects the following directions are issued. 3. The petitioner shall surrender before the learned Magistrate concerned within 10 days from today and will apply for regular bail. The learned Magistrate will dispose of the bail application in accordance with law. In the meanwhile if the petitioner is arrested she shall be released on bail on her executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like sum. If in case the Magistrate has doubt about the genuineness or correctness of the tax receipts produced by the BA.3739/11 2 sureties, the learned Magistrate can insist for production of the attested photo copies of the original title deeds of the sureties and on the following further conditions: i. The accused shall make herself available for interrogation by the investigating officer and that she should appear before the investigating officer on all Mondays and Fridays between 9.30 AM to 11.30 AM until further orders. ii. The accused shall produce their original passport before the learned Magistrate. If she is not having any valid passport, she should file an affidavit regarding the same before the Magistrate. iii. The accused will also file an affidavit that she will abide by all the conditions as mentioned above and that she will not commit any offence similar to the offence involved in this case and that she shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. iv. The accused and the sureties shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court concerned without the prior permission of the learned Magistrate. BA.3739/11 3 v. The learned Magistrate will also ensure the identity of the accused and the sureties by insisting production of electoral photo identity cards/Driving licence etc. vi. Petitioner will furnish the correct residential address and should also make available land phone number/mobile number or contact number. The petitioner shall not shift the residence without intimating the Investigating Officer and the learned Magistrate. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE vgs