IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22984 of 2009 MURARI SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 30/06/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a police case under Sections- 302, 201 and 120B/34 of I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted that the petitioner is not named. There is no eye-witness. The two others named in the F.I.R. on suspicion are alleged to have disclosed the name of the petitioner in their confessional statement before the police, inadmissible in evidence. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Town P.S. Case No.46/2009. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)