IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.970 OF 2007 Savita Santosh Pagare ] PETITIONER. VERSUS 1 The State of Maharashtra & others ] RESPONDENTS. ----- Mr. S.K.Tambe, AGP, for respondent No.1. ----- Coram : Naresh H. Patil and N. D. Deshpande, JJ. Date : 12th June, 2009. ORAL ORDER : [ Per – Naresh H. Patil, J. ] Heard. 2 In view of alternate efficacious remedy available to the petitioner under the provisions of 267A of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961, we are not inclined to exercise our extra ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner may resort to the same. In case any delay occurs for resorting to such remedy, the authority may consider the same while considering the application for condonation of delay in view of pendency of writ petition in this Court. 3 Petition is accordingly disposed of. [ N. D. Deshpande, J. ] [ Naresh H. Patil, J. ] pcr/wp935.07