1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL Nos.1347/2009; 1348/2009; 1349/2009 & 1350/2009. Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court s’ Orders or directions and Court’s or Judge’s Order Registrar s Orders.. ’ CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 25th JUNE, 2009 --- P.C.:- 1) Heard Mr.S.L.Bhapkar learned Counsel for the appellant/original claimant. 2) The unfortunate land-owners in Land References, being LAR Nos. 679/1999; 680/1999; 681/1999 and 682/1999, having faced dismissal of the References by order dated 29.10.2002 recorded by Additional District Judge, Beed, are in the first appeals. 3) During the course of submissions, Mr. Bhapkar informed that, in identical Reference being L.A.R No. 227/2000, the learned District Judge allowed the Reference by order dated 17th November, 2004. Mr.Bhapkar desires, in terms of 2 Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to prosecute the remedy before the learned Collector in the light of the Award of enhancement dated 17.11.2004. 4) The difficulty of limitation faced by the appellants herein can be resolved as the appeals were pending in this Court and there was delay on the part of the appellant to remove the objections. The long drawn refusal of Reference dated 29.10.2002, may not be a ground for the learned Collector to reject the representations in terms of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act. 5) The appeals are allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/bdv/fa1347.09