IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6347 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision 03.11.2009 Babita ...... Petitioner VERSUS Vijay Kumar @ Surinderpal ...... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.C.B.Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL): Aggrieved against the order dated 06.10.2009, passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Amloh, whereby the evidence of the petitioner- plaintiff (herein referred as 'the petitioner') has been closed by order, he has preferred this petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that sufficient opportunities were not granted to the petitioner to lead evidence as such he has sought one more opportunity to conclude her evidence on cost. In view of the matter, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to conclude her evidence within three months from the next date of hearing, subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- as costs. This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save huge expenses which may be incurred by the respondents as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. If, still dissatisfied, the respondents may move this Court for recalling this order. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 03.11.2009 mamta-II