,XI-HG—78 ^-EE[ ^lf^TcFi^ ^)tl1<H^fo, f®l<rliy^< WR^TTWfli^ •^200 3TT^T TT^R' (^f^^T) ^TT^T'^T'f^W '^SH 3T?^T'^T?N)' '^H^R'^f^T 3TT^T <=Cil^(ci^1rl TTF7^ff ^f f^st <P»l^l< ^'3tfiW3TT^?T ^AN&Lb BfcNfcM: MOiyBLB JU5TICE DMIRENDRA A1I5HR^ CONTEMPT PrrmON N0.124/2008 Vs RESPONDENTS 1. Fa^ Ral 2< Matiavati Kadiyame, S/o ftamial, Aged abd 2, (C. AWkhande, S/o Shri Latkhor, about 35 years, Occupation" k^ha Karmi°2, Madhayamik Shala, ki Block-Manpur, DiSt. nandgaon (C.6P.) ut42years, Shik^ha Karmi Srade" Madhayamik Shala, Bharritola B!o|;k3=AAanpur, Dist. Rajnandgaon ?.) 3. SrTff. Mena Kosa , W/o Hira La! Ko^are, Aged about 42 years, Oc^upation-ShJksha Karmi ^rade 2, HE^h School Bharritola, Block-Manpur, Di^t. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Baitiev Singh Urwasha, C/o Brijial Ur^asha, Aged about 32 years, 4. Oc Ma^hGyamik Shala, Msnpur, Bbck- Majipur, Dist. ftajnandgaon (C.S,) 1. Shi Of ^ 2. Shi Of Rai ;upatJon-Shiksha Karmi Grade-2. 'i L.5. Pradhan. Biock Education Ficer, Block Manpur, Dist- norsdgaon (C»S) 'i D.D. Mandley, Chief Executive Ficer, Janpad- Manpur, Dist. nandgaon {CG) F XI-HC—78 3TT^T ^T t^ThF T[?TT '3T?^T'^TT5F NIH^I ?bHT<sh ~3~^ -qiq|<nq, ^t{|^41<o, [®i<ni<H^ G^4--)5L< "^ 200 ^TT^T T^R' (1?^<si<i^) ^RTTW^f^T ^H^T •^.-1 2170472008^ Miss Deepali Pandey, Advoj Heard. The petitioner has movec| 215 of the Constitution of Indld of Courts Act for initiatin^ respondents/contemnors with fr| filed by the petitsoners this Coi^ stayed the order of Annexur^ Additional Coliector with an obs^ the Additional Coitector is nol provisions of the Panchayat revision Ggainst the order dated It has been averred in working as Shiksha Karmi ^rod^ 26.10.2006 passed by the Cow^ after fne respondent No,l joine^ given pcy-scaie of Shiksha Karml aiso averred fnat they have agc^ No.7413/2007 and notices hav^ <=oi^f<n<<i1i TTPT^if ^f f^st <P»i<^i< ^T 3tRW3^T :ate for fne petitioners* this contempt petition under Section read wifn Section 12 of the Contempt contempt proceeding against the |e ailegation that-in W.P.[s] No.5651/08 Irt vide interim order dated 26,10^2006 P-3 dated 29.9.2006 passed by the |rvation thdt prima facie it appears that ti'ie competent authority under th® Rjaj Adhiniyam, 1993 to entertain the 12.6.2006. fne petition that the petitloners were t-II by virtue of the stay order a8ated ti!! June, 2007, however, subsequent!y\ ^ as Chief Executive pfficer, they were ©rade-HIfrom July, 2007. They haye n filed a writ petition bearing W<P. (5) been issued to the respondents, The ^^^, /f"^ \^€/ '^•%5?^' XI-HG—78 -T^ -?^ET r^|t^|<ri^ ^til^^Ko, f^crlH^< WH^T «»*1ieh 37T^¥I^T f<-ii°h TT^T 3?T^T 9b^i<^ ^- "^200 3TT^T 'q^RT (liclfTl<sl<^) '^Rnw^f^f ^n^r -2- above action of the respondent^ 26.10.2006 passed in WP[s] No^651/08. From perusal of the orde^ of Annexure P-3 it is observed that in revision petition fiied by one Coilector, Rajnandgaon set aside C.E.O., Janapad Panchayat Man^ 23.7.1998 and heid that only th|e order No.1829 dated 9.8.1999 shouid be considered as basis for tiie p^ In case the grievance of ^ Annexure P"3, they may initiate their grievance before the app^ petition also it is evident that fr^ the aforesaid purpose. Howevej contempt proceeding in the fact^ In view of the above, t^ deserves to be dismissed and it |s hereby dismissed^ cM^(<n^i ^TP^ff ^f fs^ <F3i<^i< . '^'^tfw^^r is in viobtion of the stay order dated ^ogesh Kumar Sahu iearneQ8 Additional all 1+ie actions purportediy taken by the Lsr on the basis of order No.567 dated irposes of seniority and servsce, he petitioner is because of the order of ippropriate proceedings for redressa! of opriate forum and from perusa! of the ey have aiready fited a writ petition for \ no case is made out for registering a ond circumstances of the present case. B petition has no substance, the Same Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Ki