-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.32 OF 1992 APPEAL NO.32 OF 1992 APPEAL NO.32 OF 1992 ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s Court’s Court’s Court’s or or or orders or directions orders or directions orders or directions Judge’s Judge’s Judge’s orders orders orders & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. Ms S.V.Gajare A.G.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 18, 2008 : MARCH 18, 2008 : MARCH 18, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The court service notice issued to the Appellant Nos.1 and 2 is returned with the remark "They are gone out of place". The report of the bailiff further records that their place of residence is not known. 2. It is obvious that the Appellants have not complied with Rule 14-A of Order VI of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 by furnishing correct address for service. On 23rd March 2006, an Advocate appearing for the Appellants has stated that he will file Vakalatnama for the Appellants within a period of two weeks from that date. Office noting shows that till date Vakalatnama is not filed by the said Advocate. Hence, Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. -2- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE