IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.CH.SURYA RAO WRIT APPEAL No.201 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 30.01.2008 in W.P. No.531 of 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: The Andhra Pradesh Ambedkar Yojana Sangam, represented by President Patha Satyam, S/o.Rajaiah, Regd.No.1033/77, R/o. Jammikunta Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District. ..... Appellant And 1. Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by Principal Secretary, R&B, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. Engineer-in-Chief, Roads and Building, Admn. & NH, Hyderabad. 3. The Superintending Engineer R&B Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. .....Respondents Counsel for the appellant : Sri K.Buchi Babu Counsel for the respondents : Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings The Court passed the following: JUDGMENT: (per Anil R. Dave, C.J.) By way of this appeal, the order passed in Writ Petition No.531 of 2008, dated 30th January, 2008 has been challenged. The apprehension, which was voiced in the said petition, was that the statue of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar was likely to be disturbed or damaged because of construction of railway over-bridge. Affidavit in reply was filed in the said petition stating that the statue was not going to be affected and the apprehension of the petitioner was not correct. On the basis of the affidavit filed, the learned Single Judge had dismissed the petition and being aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the present appellant – original petitioner has filed this appeal. At the time of hearing of this appeal, the learned Advocate appearing for the appellant has once again voiced an apprehension that possibly the statue might be destroyed at the time when the railway over-bridge would be constructed. Learned Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings appearing for the respondents has emphatically submitted that the statue will not be damaged at all. Looking to the facts in the affidavit in reply filed in the petition and in view of the assurance given by the government authorities that the statue is not to be shifted or to be disturbed, we see no reason to entertain this appeal. The appeal is dismissed. ANIL R. DAVE, C.J. 11th March, 2008 T.CH. SURYA RAO, J. ........REGISTRAR To 1. The Principal Secretary, R&B, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. The Engineer-in-Chief, Roads and Building, Admn. & NH, Hyderabad. 3. The Superintending Engineer R&B Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. 4. Two copies to Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 5. Two C.D. copies. ARS