BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGHCOURT OFCHHATTISGARH "\ AT BILASPUR fC.G.l W.P. (227) N0. Of 2011 PETITIONER J^- ..<\v ,^»y' ^y' S-P Av i^ RESPONDENT Smt. Priya Rajput, W/o. Shri Manoj Singh Rajput, aged about 20 years, R/o. Village-Budhwara, P.0. Mohgaon, Tahsil-Saja, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS Manoj Singh Rajput, s/o. Shri Jawahar Singh Rajput, aged about 30 years, R/o. Behind Shiv Temple, Karmachari Nagar, P.S. Mohah NagarTahsil and Dist. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITIONUNDERARTICLE 227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OFTHE PETITIONER As mentioned in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENT As mentioned in the cause title. % ffiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BBLASPUR S.B: Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra ^ PETITIONER RESPONDENT Writ Petition f227yNo. 2086/2011 : Smt. Priya Rajput Versus : Manoj Sn^i Rajput ApDearance: Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, counsel for the petitioner. WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTmjTION OF INDIA ORALORDER (20.04.2011) Heard. (2) Petitionerhasclaunedfoltowmgreliefmtfaiswritpetition: ' "1. That, tfais Hon'ble Court may kindly tie pleased tp call the entire records pertaming to the ease ofthe petitioner. 2. That, tfais Hon'ble Courtmaykmdly be pleased to set- aside the impugned order dated 10/03/2011 (Annexure P/l), passed by the Family Court, Durg in Case No. 360-A/2010 and allowed the application for grant of police protectipn and direction may kindly be issued aecordiagly. 3. Any approimate writ, direction or order may also landly be passed in favour ofthe petitioner, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the circumstances ofthe case." (3) Contention of leamed counsel for the petitioner is that she is 7, not able to attend the court because ofthe threat oh her Ufe unleased Jay therespondenl/husband. < (4) On bdng questioned as to why an application for setting aside the ex-parte order has not been moved, leamed counsel has reiterated the same ground tiiat she is notallowed to enter in the court prgamses by the respondent. (5) In the cireumstances, it is directed that if the petitipner approaches MAila Thana, Durg seeking protection to attend fhe court proceedings, she may be provided protection aad Ifaereafter petitioner may prefer an application for setting aside the ex-pMl:e orderpassed by the Family Court, Durg on 10d> March,2011. (6) With this directiori, the petition stands disposed of. (7) Certified copy as per rules. Sd//- Kcashant Kumar Mishra Judge ^