IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 208 OF 1990 Rasiklal Jeevanlal Mehta. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Govind Ramchandra Nadkarni. ... Defendant. None for the parties. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 6th December 2007. DATED: 6th December 2007. DATED: 6th December 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Vide order dated 29th November, 2007, plaintiff was called upon to file affidavit of evidence along with original documents in support of suit claim. 2. Today, nobody is present on behalf of plaintiff. Neither the affidavit of evidence nor a single document in support of suit claim is filed on record. In the circumstances, suit is dismissed under order IX rule 10 of C.P.C. for want of evidence with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)