1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.52 of 2011 [Shashikala Vijayrao Wadibhasme Vs. Union of India & others] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. R.K. Thakkar, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. R.R. Pohorkar, Adv., for respondent nos. 2 and 3. ---- CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE : 27th September, 2011. 1. Heard. 2. We find that earlier, Writ Petition No. 3177 of 2008 was filed before this Court and it was disposed of as withdrawn. Mr. Pohorkar, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 2 and 3, states that, that withdrawal was deliberately suppressed and also mala fide one. 3. Mr. Thakkar is seeking time of one week to file appropriate Reply-Affidavit. We are not inclined to grant any time. The filing of that petition ought to have been disclosed when present Writ Petition came to be filed. In any case after Written Submissions raising an objection was received in March, 2011, 2 appropriate explanation should have been tendered on record. No such step has been taken for over last six months. In this situation, we are not inclined to examine the matter. Petition is dismissed. 4. Mr. Thakkar seeks continuation of interim order for a further period of eight weeks. Mr. Pohorkar is opposing the request. 5. In the above background, we reject the request. Judge Judge |Hedau|