IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. SUIT NO.1780 OF 1991 Noshir S. Irani Plaintiff v/s. Zavera N. Philips & ors. Defendants Mr. V.K. Shiralkar i/b. M/s. Shiralkar & Co. for Plaintiff Ms. R.H. Pujari for Defendant no.3 Mr. Pramodkumar Vora for defendant no.1 CORAM:- CORAM:- CORAM:- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J ANOOP V. MOHTA, J ANOOP V. MOHTA, J DATED:- DATED:- DATED:- 18TH JUNE, 2007 18TH JUNE, 2007 18TH JUNE, 2007 P.C. . The Plaintiffs and defendant no. 1 have reched a settlement and, therefore, signed the consent terms dt. 15-6-2007. The respective Advocates have also signed the same. There is no dispute about the identification of the parties as well as their signatures. Defendant no. 3 has no objection for the consent terms. Defendant no. 2(a), 2(b) though served are not present. Anyway plaintiff by this settlement withdrawing the suit as against defendant no. 2(a), 2(b). The consent terms is marked as ’X’ and taken on record. . The undertaking as per clause 7 is also accepted. Suit is disposed off in view of consent terms subject to the rights of unsigned parties if any. (ANOOP. (ANOOP. (ANOOP. V. MOHTA) V. MOHTA) V. MOHTA)