^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR AppMcant Versus Respoudents 1. M. C. C. No. 288 of 2009 Madan Lal Agrawal, S/ o Chhedilal, aged 40 years, Railway aiid Teleconi Contractor, Shaaker Ward, Bhatapai'a, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Bharat Saachar Nigam Limited (Govt. of India Euterprises), throzigh the Chief General Maiiager, Chhattisgai'h Telecoisi Circle Raipur Auto Exchaage Buildiiig, Door Saricliar Vibhag, Opp. Maa.balaya, Raipur (C.G.) Union of India, fhrougb. fhe Secretaiy, Mm.istry of TeleconLmunication, Door Saachar Bhawaa, New DeUii, APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OFW.P. No. 2337/2005 (SB: HonT3le Shri Satish K. Agiiihotri J.) Shri Anaiid Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the appUcant/petitioner. O RD E R forall (Passed on this 11th day ofAugust, 2009) Heard, The appUcaat has filed this applicatiou for restoratiou of tlie Writ Petition No. 2337/2005 (Madaa Lal Agrawal Vs. Bharat Sanchai' Nigaai Liinited & aaofher), which was disaiissed for want ofprosecutiou vide order dated 1.7.2009. Reasonable and sufficient cause has beeu shown. The Writ Petition No. 2337/2005 may be restored to the origmal file, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1000/- to fhe High Court Legal Aid Comiaittee, wifhia a period oftevo weeks. In view of fhe above the appUcation is disposed of. A copy of fhis order may be placed on record ia Writ Petition No. 2337/2005 aiid tlie same may be Hsted for hearmg. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge