- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FERA APPEAL NO.62 OF 2008 ... Laxmikant V. Gupta ...Appellant v/s. Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents ... Shri Vikram Nankani i/b Nankani & Associates for the Appellant. Mr.A.S.Rao with Mr.K.R.Chaudhary for the Respondents. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: 22ND OCTOBER, 2008 P.C.: Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. It was - 2 - contended that the order of the tribunal is solely based on the confessional statement of the Appellant and the other persons namely Mr.Dilip Gandhi, which has been retracted and that there is no other evidence against the Appellant. Perusal of the record shows that there is other evidence on record against the Appellant showing his definite involvement. There is a finding of fact recorded in the order of the original authority that in the correspondence that was seized from Mr.Dilip Gandhi, it was seen that the correspondence were addressed to the Appellant and that he was the main person behind the transaction. These are essentially finding of facts on which the decision of the tribunal turns. No question of law arises. Appeal is, therefore, rejected. In view of disposal of Appeal, Civil Appeal does not survive for consideration. Disposed of as such. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)