IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8209 of 2011 UPENDRA YADAV @ PATHAR YADAVA Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 18-07-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. There is specific allegation against the petitioner that he gave Fasuli blow on the neck of the injured. The injury report of injured corroborates the allegation and the injured has sustained grievous injury on his neck which is vital part of the body. Although learned counsel for the petitioner tried to convince me about this fact that the petitioner has falsely been implicated on account of previous enmity and furthermore, there is no repetition of blow, but I am not at all convinced with his submission. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Makhdumpur (Tehta) P.S. Case No. 309 of 2010 stands rejected. It appears that the case of the petitioner is still pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad and the petitioner is sole accused in this case, so I am unable to understand as to why case of the petitioner is still pending for commitment. Moreover, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad is, hereby directed to commit the case of the 2 petitioner within ten days from the date of receipt of this order in accordance with law to the court of sessions and after commitment, the trial court shall take all possible steps to dispose of the case of the petitioner within nine months from the date of commitment and if the trial court fails to disposed of the case of the petitioner within the above-said period, then in that event, the trial court shall release the petitioner on bail on its own satisfaction. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)