IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 1ST FEBRUARY 2010 / 12TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 3134 of 2010(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JOHN BENSON J.,SENIOR ELECTRICIAN, GOVERNMENT CENTRAL PRESS,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA SRI.T.K.BIJU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPT.OF HIGHER EDUCATION GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PRINTING, GOVERNMENT CENTRAL PRESS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CHIEF ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR, ELECTRICAL INSPECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.3134 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a Senior Electrician Grade-II in the Government Central Press, Thiruvananthapuram. Exts.P1 and P2 circulars are issued by the third respondent prescribing qualification and experience of authorised persons for the operation and maintenance of High Tension and Extra High Tension installations. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the issuance of Exts.P1 and P2 circulars, no steps were taken by the respondents for implementing the same. To redress the grievance, the petitioner has filed repeated representations as is obvious from Ext.P4 to P6 and P8 representations. According to him, despite the said repeated representations, no action was taken to implement the direction issued by the third respondent in Exts.P1 and P2 circulars. 2. The said representations are pending before the second respondent. Admittedly, the second respondent is competent to look into the grievance raised as per the said representations. In the circumstances, W.P.(C) NO.3134 of 2010 2 there shall be a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P4, P5, P6 and P8 representations expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy o this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO.3134 of 2010 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. CRL. M.C. NO. O R D E R 3rd June, 2009