1 4.appa-30-11.apeal-908-04 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.30 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.908 OF 2004 Imtiyaj Noorahamad Hundekari. ..Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .......... Ms.P.U. Badadere, Advocate h/f. Mr.P.R. Arjunwadkar, Advocate for Applicant. Mr.D.P. Adsule, A.P.P. for the State. .......... CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 21st JANUARY, 2011. P.C. 1. Counsel for the Applicant submits that in view of rejection of the earlier bail Application filed by the Applicant, the Applicant will not press this Application on merits. She further submits that the Applicant would be more than content if the Appeal is taken up for hearing. Accordingly this application is dismissed as not pressed. 2. Insofar as the request for expediting the hearing of Appeal is concerned, we may place on record that as per the present assignment PPD 2 4.appa-30-11.apeal-908-04 Appeals covered by the category of "Convicts in Jail' are already treated as expedited category cases. In the circumstances, the Office shall take steps to list the Applicant’s Appeal as per its turn under the category : “Convicts in Jail”. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)