HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3663 OF 2010 DATE:03-09-2010 BETWEEN Gubbala Veera Venkata Satyanarayana. …Petitioner AND Mamidisetti Chitkaladevi & others. …Respondents THIS COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3663 OF 2010 ORDER: This revision under Article 227 of Constitution of India is directed to revise the orders of the Senior Civil Judge, Razole, dated 15.7.2010 whereby he allowed C.M.A.No.3 of 2010 setting aside the orders of the Junior Civil Judge, Razole, dated 29.3.2010 passed in I.A.No.154 of 2010 in O.S.No.36 of 2010 granting injunction in favour of the revision petitioner-plaintiff, and remitted the matter to the Junior Civil Judge to decide the I.A. afresh by giving an opportunity to the parties. The revision petitioner-plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction and pending the same, he filed I.A.No.154 of 2010 for grant of temporary injunction. The trial Court allowed the I.A. by order, dated 29.3.2010 without complying the mandatory provision under Order XXXIX Rule 3-A C.P.C. namely, issuing notice to the opposite party. Only after issuing notice to the opposite party, the Court can dispose of the injunction application as per Rule 3-A of Order XXXIX. Since the trial Court granted ex parte interim injunction without issuing the mandatory notice to the respondents- defendants, the impugned order passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Razole do not suffer from any manifest illegality warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed. It is needless to say that the trial Court has to dispose of I.A.No.154 of 2010 afresh after giving opportunity to the parties uninfluenced by any of the observations made by it or by the lower appellate Court. No order as to costs. _______________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J. SEPTEMBER 03, 2010 Tsr.