IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU MONDAY, THE 19TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 30TH MAGHA 1928 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 730 of 2007() ----------------------------- CRA.517/2006 of III ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, KOLLAM MC.58/2006 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, KARUNAGAPPALLY .................... REVN. PETITIONER: APPELLANTS/COUNTER PETITIONERS ------------------------------------------------- 1. THAJUDEEN KUNJU, KOIPPURATHU, KOLLAKAMURI, VADAKKUMTHALA VILLAGE, PAMMANA PANCHAYATH, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. SHAREEFA BEEVI, W/O. THAJUDEEN KUNJU, KOIPPURATHU, KOLLAKAMURI, VADAKKUMTHALA VILLAGE, PAMMANA PANCHAYATH, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.GOPALAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT/PETITIONER ----------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. BY ADV. SRI. C.M. KAMMAPPU, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.R. UDAYABHANU, J ================================= CRL. R.P. NO. 730 OF 2007 ================================= Dated this the 19 th day of February 2007 O R D E R The revision petitioners are the sureties who have been imposed with the penalty of Rs.12,000/- as modified by the appellate court. It is submitted that the petitioners are the parents of the absconding accused who is involved in an akbari offence. The counsel submitted that he is working right now in the Middle East. The plea is that the petitioners are too poor and that they have no contact with the son. I find that the above submission cannot be believed. All the same, considering the plea of the counsel for the revision petitioners penalty is reduced to Rs. 75,000/- each. The rest of the order is retained. The Crl. R.P is disposed of accordingly. K.R. UDAYABHANU, JUDGE. RV