Stay application No.858/2008 with DSA 8/2008 UHon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Heard Mr. P.C. Bisht, learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record. This appeal, U/S 100 C.P.C., has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 5-11-2007 passed by District Judge Almora in C.A. No. 20/2006, thereby dismissing the appeal preferred against the judgment and decree dated 12-7-2006, passed by Civil Judge (J.D.) Almora, in C.S. No. 49 of 1998. Perusal of record reveals that the plaintiff/Forest Department has leased out some land to one Kushal Singh, husband of defendant/appellant No.1, and father of respondents 2 and 3 respectively for constructing a temporary shop for a limited period and the said lease was determined on 14.3.92 and since then the defendants are in illegal possession of the land in question. Both the courts below have recorded concurrent finding of fact on the point of illegal possession of the defendants/appellants. This appeal involves no substantial question of law. I do not find any force in this appeal and the same is dismissed in limine. The stay application also stands dismissed. Dated: 14-8-2008 (B.C. K., J.) ISB