[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 331/2008 OMPRAKASH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN Date: 02.05.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. Amit S. Shekhawat for the accused-petitioner. Mr. B.S. Chhaba, Public Prosecutor for the State. *** The present criminal revision petition under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (for short 'the Act of 2000') is directed against the order dated 08.04.2008 passed by the Sessions Judge, Sikar in Appeal No. 42/2008 in relation to FIR No. 42/1983 registered at Police Station Raghunathgarh, District Sikar for the offence under Sections 461 IPC, by which the bail application of the accused- petitioner has been rejected. Brief facts of the case are that first information report was lodged against the petitioner and some other persons for the offence under Section 461 IPC. Thereafter both the parties have entered into a compromise. Since the petitioner was juvenile at the time of lodging of FIR, therefore, his case was sent to the Juvenile Justice Board. During pendency of the criminal case, both the parties have entered into a compromise and all the persons were acquitted [2] except the petitioner as his case was pending before the Juvenile Justice Board. After acquittal of his family members, the petitioner was under the impression that the criminal case is over and, therefore, he did not appear before the Juvenile Justice Board. On 04.09.1992, bail bonds of the petitioner were forfeited by the Juvenile Justice Board and non-bailable warrant was issued him. When the petitioner came to know about non-bailable warrant, he surrendered himself before the Court concerned and moved regular bail application under Section Section 437 Cr.P.C. but the same was dismissed vide order dated 03.04.2008. Against the order dated 03.04.2008, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Sessions Judge, Sikar but the same has also been dismissed and his bail application has been rejected vide order impugned dated 08.04.2008. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order impugned dated 08.04.2008, the present criminal revision petition has been filed by the petitioner. I have heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and have also gone through the order impugned dated 08.04.2008. As the petitioner failed to appear before the Court concerned on the date fixed, therefore, his bail bonds have been forfeited and non-bailable warrant has been issued against him. [3] Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the petitioner undertakes to appear before the Court concerned on each and every date of hearing fixed by the Court. Having heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and in view of the statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Consequently, the present criminal revision petition is allowed and it is, therefore, ordered that accused-petitioner Omprakash S/o Jaisaram be released on bail in FIR No. 42/1983 registered at Police Station Raghunathgarh, District Sikar, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. Record be sent back forthwith. (K.S. RATHORE), J. /KKC/