IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WP.No. 19898 OF 2010 Between: B.A.Krishna Reddy ..... Petitioner V/s. The Commissioner, GHMC Tank bund, Hyderabad & 4-Ors. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri M.V. Rajaram Counsel for the Respondents : Sri R. Ramachandra Reddy The Court made the following : (Order follows 2nd page) THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WP.No. 19898 OF 2010 O R D E R : The petitioner claims to be the owner and possessor of H.No.11-13-1349/1, Road No.4, Margadarsi Colony, Kothapet, Hyderabad. It is alleged that the third respondent herein, who is the owner of plot No.22/12, which is situated just exactly behind the petitioner’s house has been constructing a building without leaving set back on all four sides. The petitioner made a complaint in December 2009 bringing the said fact to the notice of second respondent and requesting to take necessary action against the third respondent as well as fifth respondent, who is the builder. As there was no response, the petitioner had again submitted another representation dated 07-7-2010. Alleging that the respondents 1 and 2 failed to take any action, the present writ petition has been filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel appearing for GHMC. As the material available on record shows that the petitioner’s representation dated 07-7-2010 was acknowledged by the Office of the respondents 1 and 2, the learned standing counsel for the Corporation states that the same will be considered in accordance with law. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to the correctness as of the allegations made by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to enquire into the allegations made by the petitioner in his representation dated 07-7-2010 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity to the respondents 3 and 5 to rebut the allegations. Such exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. No costs. Justice G. Rohini. 30/8/2010 I s L THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 19898 OF 2010 Circulation Entry No. Date: 30-08-2010 COMPUTER No. 43 Court Master: I s L