1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3180/2010 ( Madhu T. Bawankule and another -: VERSUS :- Ramchandra G. Wanjari ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 19 th NOVEMBER 2010. In Special Darkhast No.20/2006 by impugned order dated 15/4/2010 Joint Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhandara has permitted the respondent – judgment debtor opportunity to lead evidence in support of his objections at Exh.41. Adv. Shri Solao for petitioner – decree holder invites attention to orders of this court in First Appeal No. 245/2006 passed on 9th of August 2006 to show that in case the terms and conditions thereof are not complied with interim order stands vacated and petitioner gets liberty to execute the decree. I find that said High Court order cannot be construed to mean that defence of judgment debtor in execution is struck-off. As interim order stands vacated, petitioner - decree holder has proceeded further in execution and the trial Court has 2 passed impugned order in execution only. There is no jurisdictional error or perversity. Writ petition is therefore, rejected. No costs. JUDGE Tambaskar.