1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3612/2008 {Sarabati & Others Versus The Additional District Judge & Others} Date of Order :: 7th July, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. M.M. Ranjan for the petitioners BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The plaintiff – respondent no.3 – Smt. Shanti Devi filed a suit for permanent and mandatory injunction in the trial court in respect of disputed piece of land. An application for temporary injunction was also filed. The trial court vide its order dated 12th March, 2007 allowed the application for temporary injunction and restrained the defendants from obstructing the disputed way and also directed to remove the obstruction already made at the disputed way. Being aggrieved with the same, the defendants preferred an appeal but the same was also dismissed by the first appellate court vide order dated 20th March, 2008. Being aggrieved 2 with the same, the present writ petition has been preferred by the defendants. 3. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and also examined the impugned orders passed by both the courts below. Both the courts below have recorded a concurrent finding in respect of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury in favour of the plaintiff – respondent. I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the orders passed by both the courts below so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK