IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2008 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1930 RP.No. 436 of 2008(I) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.12473/2007 DATED 16/11/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: -------------------------------------------------- 1. VIJAYAKUMAR P., AGED 37 YEARS, S/O. AYYAPPAN, PILAKKIL HOUSE, GANESSAGIRI P.O., MUNDAYA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. SHARATHCHANDRAN B., AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. BALAKRISHNA PILLAI, PATHIYATH VEEDU, KULAPPULLY P.O., SHORNUR. 3. K. BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. K.PONNAN, KIZHAKKEKKARATHODY HOUSE, KANAYAM P.O., SHORNUR. 4. P. KRISHNADAS, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. P. RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, POKKATTIL HOUSE, KOONATHARA P.O., VANIYAMKULAM. 5. A.C. KOCHUKUTTAN, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. CHUNGAN, PALLITHODY HOUSE, P.O. KALLIPPADAM, SHORNUR. 6. RAMACHANDRAN, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O. ACHUTHAN NAIR, KANDARAMATH HOUSE, AMAYUR P.O. PATTAMBI (VIA), PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 7. MANIKANDAN C., AGED 41 YEARS, S/O. NARAYANAN, CHAKKUMTHODY HOUSE, MELE PATTAMBI P.O., KODALUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 8. MOHANAN P., AGED 41 YEARS, S/O. NARAYAN, PALUTHODIYIL HOUSE, KANAYAM P.O., SHORNUR (VIA), PALAKKAD. 9. UNNIKRISHNAN K., AGED 41 YEARS, S/O. ACHUTHAN NAIR, KANDARAMATH HOUSE, AMAYAR P.O. PATTAMBI (VIA), PALAKKAD DISTRICT. R.P. NO. 436/2008-I: 10. T. GANGADHARAN, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O. VELU, THARAYIL HOUSE, KALLADIPATTA P.O., PATTAMBI (VIA), PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 11. K. UMESHBABU, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O. LATE K.THUPPAN, EZHUTHACHAN KUNNATH HOUSE, MANNAUR P.O., KAVALAPPARA (VIA), PALAKKAD DIST. 12. P.P. MANIKANDAN, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O. KOTHA, PALATHINKALPADI VEEDU, NELLIKKATTIRI P.O., NHAGATTIRI. 13. U.S. SREENIVAS SREEDHARAN, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. U. SREEDHARAN, UNNIAMBATH HOUSE, MUNDAYA, GANESHAGIRI, SHORNUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 14. JAYAPRAKASH, AGD 37 YEARS, S/O. M.VASU, MOOTHEDATH HOUSE, P.O. KANATAM, SHORNUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 15. K. RAVEENDRAN, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. KUNJAN, KIZHAKKEKARATHODY HOUSE, KANAYAM P.O., SHORNUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 16. RADHAKRISHNAN. K., AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. GANGATHARAN NAIR, KADAMBATT HOUSE, NEDUGOTTOOR, SHORNUR P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 17. NARAYANAN, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O. VELAYUDHAN, KOLKKATTIL HOUSE, PANAYOOR P.O., VANIYAMKULAM. 18. PARAMESWARAN, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. VELAYUDHAN, KOLKKATTIL HOUSE, PANAYOOR P.O., VANIYAMKULAM. 19. D. CHANDRANATHAN, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O. P. DANIEL, ANANDAVILASAM, VAZHUTHOOR, MEEYATHUKARA. 20. V. THULASEEDHARAN PILLAI, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. VASUDEVA PILLAI, SNJOTHAMANDIRAM, KURIGODU, CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 21. P. UNNIKRISHNAN, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O. DAMODHARAN, PALLATH HOUSE, PALAPPURAM P.O., OTTAPPALAM. R.P. NO. 436/2008-I: 22. T.K. UNNIKRISHNAN, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. BHASKARAN, THEKKEKATTIL HOUSE, PALAPPURAM, OTTAPPALAM. 23. A.K. DILEEPKUMAR, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. KOPANANTHAN, ALIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KANJIRATHINGAL P.O., KATTAKAMPAL. BY ADV. SRI.G.D.PANICKER, ADV. SMT.JEENA JOSEPH. RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. GENERAL SECRETARY, KSEB PETTY CONTRACTORS AND CONTRACT LINE WORKERS UNION, NANTHANKODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE GENERAL SECRETARY, K.S.E.B CONTRACT WORKERS CENTRE (CITU), B.T.R MEMORIAL BUILDING, MELETHAMBANUR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE GENERAL SECRETARY, K.S.E.B CONTRACT WORKERS UNION (INTUC), ANGELS, ARAMOOLA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-32. 5. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY, LABOUR DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SMT. PUSHPALATHA .M.K. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/05/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RP No.436 of 2008 in Writ Petition(C) No.12473/07 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order Heard. In view of the Judgment in Writ Petition (C) No.28836/05, Writ Petition (C) No.12473/07 should have been allowed. But, this Court, by a mistake, closed the said Writ Petition without passing any orders. The same is an error apparent on the face of the record. Accordingly, the RP is allowed. The judgment under review dated 16.11.2007 is recalled and the Writ Petition is restored to file. 23.05.2008 K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,JUDGE sta 2