IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29367 of 2010 Between: Patelgudem Krishnaiah … Petitioner And The Special Grade Dy. Collector & Revenue Divisional Officer, (Land Acquisition) Hyderabad and others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Boya Ravinder Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: AGP for Land Acquisition Counsel for respondent No.2: Sri N. Naveen Kumar Counsel for respondent No.3: Sri D. Ramalinga Swamy This Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29367 of 2010 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to direct respondent No.1 to refer the dispute to the competent civil Court with regard to the compensation amount payable in respect of land admeasuring Ac.5.00 in Sy.No.58/5 of Vinobha Bhave Nagar, Ibrahimpatan Bhagayat, Ibrahimpatan Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The abovementioned land was acquired under notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on 15.03.2010. The petitioner is claiming interest over the said land and consequently claimed compensation on the strength of a patta granted in his favour by respondent No.2. His grievance is that ignoring the said patta, respondent No.1 is seeking to pay compensation to respondent No.3. At the hearing, Sri Boya Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that respondent No.2 in its counter affidavit has taken the stand that the patta granted to the petitioner was cancelled in the year 1998 itself. He contended that the petitioner had no knowledge of such cancellation. In view of cancellation of patta, on the strength of which the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition, no relief can be granted in this Writ Petition. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the cancellation of patta, he is entitled to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law before the competent Court. Subject to the liberty given as above, the Writ Petition is dismissed. As a sequel, interim order, dated 25.11.2010, is vacated and WPMP.No.37388 of 2010 is dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 22.12.2011 ES