IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41746 of 2010 NAREDNRA MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 12.01.2011 A supplementary affidavit dated 05.01.2011 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner stating that the name of the petitioner, his parentage, his village and his police station has been rightly mentioned in the bail petition, but the district has been wrongly typed as ‘Supaul’, although it should have been ‘Patna’ which is clear from the affidavit sworn by the wife of the petitioner. In the said circumstances, order dated 22.12.2010 passed in this case is modified only to the extent that District ‘Supaul’ mentioned in the address of the petitioner should be read as District ‘Patna’. If the cost of Fax is deposited by the petitioner by tomorrow, i.e. 13.01.2011, let this order be sent to Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh in connection with Ghouswari P.S. No.30 of 2010 through fax. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)