IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 6168 of 2000 Between: 1 Ch.Mohan Krishna, S/o. Ganga Raju, Vedurupaka, Rayavaram Mandal, East Godavari District 2 P.Srinivasa Rao, S/o Soma Raju, R/o. Hukumpeta, Rajahmundray, East Godavari District ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 A.P.State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by Regional Manager, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 2 Chairman & Managing Director, A.P.S.R.T.C., RTC X Roads, Musheerabad, Hyderabad-500 020 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of court of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not selecting the candidates in the ratio of 1:7:6:1 for the A,B,C and D groups to the Notification dt. 9.11.1999 for the posts of Conductors Grade -IIO as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, contrary to law, violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the A.P. Scheduled Castes (Rationalization of Reservation) Act, 2000 and issue consequential direction to forthwith effect to the recruitment to the posts based upon the Act and the Rules made there under the pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners : MR.L.RAVICHANDER Counsel for the Respondents: C.PRAKASH REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following : ORDER : It is reported by the learned counsel for petitioners that the subject matter of this writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 18th February 2009. ajr