12 % 27.09.2011 Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Soahib Haider, Advocate for R-1. Mr. jayant Tripathi, Advocate for the respondent/AS! & Govt. of Delhi. + CONT. CAS (C) No. 395/2011 * Respondents have put in appearance. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that in terms of annexure 'C' which is a communication sent by the Department of respondent No.1 dated 29th April, 2011, the petitioner has been informed that the Mosque in question has not been declared as a centrally monument, and hence, the maintenance of the same is not within the ambit of the Archaeological Survey of India. This communication (annexure 'C'), also states that the petitioner had himself, in his application, stated that this ancient monument is not a protected one under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 Act 1958 but was found to have been notified by Delhi Administration as a Wakf property at serial No. 386 vide notification No. 10469/75-DWB. Learned counsels for the respondents have pointed out that if the petitioner is aggrieved, he may approach the Wakf Board. This submission has force. CONT. CAS (C) No. 395/2011 page 1 of2 ) - I I Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified // / 0/ Nothing survives in this petition, it is dispostof accordingly. SEPTEMBER 27 1 2011 jj_K, CONT. CAS (C) No. 395/2011 INDERMEET KAURI J. page2 of2 '1 - ! - I