IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.55 -M of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 18, 2010 JASVIR KAUR & ANR. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) On 8.1.2010, the following order was passed:- “This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. prays for directions for protection of the petitioners who are legally married. Learned counsel contends that petitioner no.1-Jasvir Kaur is a divorcee. The earlier husband, respondent No.4 Raghubir Singh, is harassing the petitioners by way of making false complaints. Notice of motion for 18.02.2010. In the meantime, SHO P.S. Talwandi Chaudhrian, District Kapurthala shall ensure that no harm comes to the petitioners. The petitioners and respondent no.4 are directed to remain present in Court. Respondent no.3 shall ensure the 2 presence of respondent no.4 in Court.” Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from ASI Bakshi Ram of Police Station, Talwandi Chaudhrian, District Kapurthala, states that petitioner No.1-Jasvir Kaur has given a statement to the effect that she has no apprehension of threat from Raghubir Singh (respondent No.4) and would not like to pursue the matter any further. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners have not come present in court, although they were directed to do so. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the respondent-State, the petition is disposed of. February 18, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?