IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.903 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : APRIL 27, 2011 HAZARI SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, HARYANA & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. JS Randhwa, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. SS Nara, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.4. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition challenges order dated 31.7.2003 (Annexure P-1), passed by Collector, Karnal, order dated 20.10.2004 (Annexure P-4), passed by Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak and order dated 3.10.2005 (Annexure P-6), passed by Financial Commissioner, Haryana. 2 Collector, Karnal, vide order (Annexure P-1), appointed respondent No.4-Raghbir Singh as Lambardar for Village Mehmadpur, Tehsil and District Karnal. The appeal and revision carried by the petitioner have been dismissed vide other impugned orders viz. Annexures P-4 and P-6. 3 While considering the comparative merit, it has been noticed by Collector, Karnal that the petitioner was involved in a Civil Writ Petition No.903 of 2010 2 criminal case and was convicted. It has been said that a Lambardar is required to have a clean character and record and, therefore, respondent No.4 makes a better candidate for appointment as Lambardar. 4 Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the order of sentence was converted into an order releasing the petitioner on probation. 5 It is not in dispute that the judgment of conviction has been maintained. No such demerit is attached to the claim of respondent No.4. In such circumstances, this court does not find any reason to judicially review the order passed by the Collector, which has been upheld by appellate and revisional authorities. 6 The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. April 27, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?