IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 2223 of 2010 Date of Decision: 28.09.2010 Sanjeev Kumar .... Petitioner Versus Gurjeet Singh ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. R.K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed challenging order dated 4.2.2010 passed by Rent Controller, Chandigarh whereby application moved by the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 seeking impleadment was rejected by observing that earlier issue of non-joinder of necessary party was also decided against the defendant and in favour of the plaintiff. In fact, Gurjeet Singh, claiming himself landlord of the demised property has filed one eviction petition against the tenant Sanjeev Kumar Dhuria. Tenant in his written statement has admitted that he has taken demised property on rent from Sh. Gurjeet Singh. Question of title is not involved in the present case. Relationship of landlord-tenant is also not in question. Merely because petitioner herein is appointed as official Liquidator of the Company M/s. Vedson Engineering Ltd. does not make the official Liquidator proper or necessary party in the eviction petition filed against the tenant. In the opinion of this Court, the question as to whether property in C.R. No. 2223 of 2010 2 question is owned by the Company M/s. Vedson Engineering Ltd. or is owned by landlord can not be gone into in the ejectment proceeding pending between landlord-tenant. Petitioner shall be at liberty to establish right and title over the property in question in other appropriate forum. I find no illegality or jurisdictional error in the impugned order. Petition is dismissed. (ALOK SINGH) 28.09.2010 JUDGE reena