WP(C) 1105/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during pe ndency of the writ petition, the respondent No. 6 against whom the complaint of being not a resident of the area in which Anganwadi Centre in question is locate d has been made, has expired. As per the affidavit filed by the CDPO, the said r espondent is a resident of the area in which the Anganwadi Centre is located. Be that as it may, since the respondent No. 6 has expired, there is no question of setting aside and quashing of her appointment as Anganwadi Worker. The writ petition is disposed of. The respondents may initiate fresh process of selection in the said Anganwadi Centre for the vacant post in accordance with la w.