IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9132 of 2008. Decided on: 24.10.2011. _______________________________________________ Narender Sood. … Petitioner. Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): It is submitted by Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the petitioner that due to subsequent developments, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. Moreover, he has been found guilty in the disciplinary proceedings. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to take recourse for the redressal of his grievance as advised under law, in the appropriate forum. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 24, 2011. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?