IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42149 of 2009 SANGITA DEVI, W/O Kariya Dome, resident of Kali Mandir Ke Samne North Block at Gate P.S. Phulwarisharif, District- Patna.....Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR..........................................Opposite Party. ----------- 02. 10.12.2009. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Pulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 33 of 2009 for offences punishable under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. The name of the petitioner has transpired in course of investigation regarding the dacoity committed in the house of the informant by 6-7 persons and in which cash and another articles were taken away by the criminals. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the case has been instituted against 6-7 persons and the petitioner is a lady whose name has transpired by reason of a statement made by the co-accused. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that neither any recovery has been made from her possession or from her house nor she was put on T.I. Parade. It is submitted that for no reason she is in custody since 21.02.2009 and similarly situated another accused namely, Gangiya Devi has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 19260 of 2009 vide order passed on 23.11.2009. Learned counsel thus submits that the case of the petitioner is same and similar footing. 2 Having regard to the facts and circumstances set forth, let petitioner Sangita Devi be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Patna, in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 33 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (A) One of the bailors would be close relative of the petitioner who will swear an affidavit as to how he/she is/was related to the petitioner. (B) The petitioner is involved in any other case. (C) The petitioner would give an undertaking that she would receive the police papers on the given date and would not try to delay the trial in any manner. (D) That the petitioner would be attending the court below on each and every date fixed and the failure on his part to attend the court below on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the court below would confer liberty on the court below to initiate proceedings for cancellation of his bail bonds and for taking him into custody. U.K. (Jyoti Saran,J)