In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 6917 of 2008 Date of decision: November 30, 2009 Ajay Kumar .. Petitioner Vs. Vandna Kumari and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. S.S. Hira, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.D. Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. A.N. Jindal, J The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside he order dated 18.11.2008 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned Additional District Judge (Ad-hoc), Fast Tract Court, Hoshiarpur. The respondent-wife was awarded a sum of Rs.4000/- against the petitioner-husband under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act vide order dated 18.11.2008 passed by the learned Additional District Judge (Ad- hoc), Fast Track Court, Hoshiarpur, in the proceedings under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petitioner has assailed the legality of the order on the ground that though he was earning Rs.12926/- per month, yet, the respondent was also in job while teaching in the private school. It is worth mentioning that no document is forthcoming that after 24.2.2007, the respondent was in the job of private school. It is also no denying a fact that the respondent was not in the job after 24.2.2007, thus, the fact remains that she had no means to maintain herself after 24.2.2007, therefore, the learned Additional District Judge, Hoshairpur, while keeping in view the salary, which the petitioner was drawing, awarded reasonable amount of maintenance pendente lite to the respondent. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. November 30, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge