IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1410 of 2009 1. SHRI NATH BHAGAT S/O LATE BALIRAM BHAGAT R/O VILL.- SAWARI, P.S.- KACHWAR, DISTT.- ROHTAS -------------Appellant. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE JOINT DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE CONSOLIDATION OFFICER NASARIGANJ, ROHTAS 4. MARACHHO DEVI W/O LALOO YADAV R/O VILL.- SAWARI, P.S.- KACHHAWA DISTT.- ROHTAS AS PRESENT R/O VILL.- DARIHAT, P.O.- DARIHAT, P.S.- DEHRI, DISTT.- ROHTAS --------------Respondents. ----------- 3. 13.1.2011 The present L.P.A. arises out of an order passed by the learned single Judge in C.W.J.C. no.7656 of 2009 on 21.4.2009 wherein the main grievance of the appellant before the learned single Judge was that the respondent-authority had not considered the validity of any document and the court below had no jurisdiction to settle the dispute. Learned single Judge has observed that the revisional authority has passed a well considered and reasoned order on the basis of documentary evidence and submission made by the parties. However, learned single Judge has observed that petitioner may approach the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievances. However, in view of the fact that the authority had not gone into the validity of the documents, we are of the opinion that finding of the learned single Judge that appellant should avail an alternative remedy can be modified to the extent that appellant may file a civil suit after denotification under section 26-A of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956. 2 After denotification under the aforesaid Act as and when appellant files a civil suit, the same would be disposed of by the court below without being influenced by any observation made by this Court in this proceeding. With the aforesaid observation/direction this appeal is disposed of. Sudip ( T. Meena Kumari, J.) ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. )