IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 9284 of 2008. Decided on 8th December, 2010. Mangat Ram Sharma. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Y.P. S. Dhaulta, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. R.P. Singh and Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate Generals. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner is seeking promotion to the post of Mate. In fact, his case was favourably recommended by the Assistant Engineer, H.P. P.W.D., Sub-Division, Karsog vide Annexure A-1, dated 12.02.2001. However, it has come in the reply filed by respondent No. 1 that the case of the petitioner will be considered strictly in accordance with Recruitment and Promotion Rules as and when the vacancy becomes available. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner, in accordance with law after taking into consideration Annexure A- 1, dated 12.02.2001 as and when the vacancy becomes available. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 08, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO. - 2 - - 3 -