IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5736 of 2009 NARENDRA SHARMA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 4. 25.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, for the Headmaster of the school respondent no. 4 and for private respondent no. 5. The allegation in the writ petition is for non-compliance of the directions of the Court in C.W.J.C. No. 12917 of 2005 for removal of encroachment from the school in question when the Circle Officer is alleged to cast his burden on other authorities. The writ petition at Paragraph-2 claims that the petitioner is the President of the Shiksha Samiti, Sahar Rampur. Learned counsel submits in fact the petitioner is the Secretary and not the President. On the query of the Court with regard to his present status in the Shiksha Samiti, learned counsel is unable to assist the Court. The allegation relates to alleged encroachment on the lands of the Government Middle School, Sahar Rampur at Naubatpur by private respondent no. 5. The Government is stated to be the owner of the lands. In its counter affidavit it denies any 2 encroachment by respondent no. 5. In a separate counter affidavit, the Headmaster of the school denies encroachment similarly. Their stand is that matters have been resolved amicably. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the so called resolution of the dispute is a sham based on forged compromise. If the owner of the land is not complaining, the person in possession of the land as the Headmaster is not complaining, there is no occasion for this Court to go into the matter at the behest of what appears to be a busy body. The writ application is dismissed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)