IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17520 of 1999 Between: L.Rameshkumar S/o. Narahari, Chief Executive Officer, Kesara STEP, Rangareddy. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Special Commissioner/Managing Director, A.P.Society for Training and Employment Promotion Boats Club, Sec'bad. 2 District Collector/Chairman, SETWAR, Warangal, 3 Chief Executive Officer, SETWAR, Warangal, 4 District Collector/Chairman, K.STEP, R.R.District, 5 Chief Executive Officer, Kesara STEP, Rangareddy District, .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the Proceedings No.MD/APSTEP/A1/97 dated:27.9.1998 in so far as it relates to the petitioner and declare to the extent that the orders posting the petitioner as Junior Assistant, Kesara STEP, R.R.District is illegal and consequently direct the respondents to post the petitioner at Warangal as Junior Assistant, STEP, Warangal and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.SURYANARAYANA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,2,4&5: G.P. FOR EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING. Counsel for the Respondent No.3: MR.K.RAMANUJA CHARI The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the Proceedings No.MD/APSTEP/A1/97 dated:27.9.1998 in so far as it relates to the petitioner and declare to the extent that the orders posting the petitioner as Junior Assistant, Kesara STEP, R.R.District is illegal and consequently direct the respondents to post the petitioner at Warangal as Junior Assistant, STEP, Warangal.” At the hearing, Sri S.Satyanarayana Rao, learned counsel representing Sri A.Suryanarayana Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 16.12.2008 va