IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 504 OF 2007 PREMANAND S. VERENKAR ... Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 4 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. R. G. Ramani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. L. Dharwadkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. V. Rodrigues, Advocate for the respondent No.4. Mr. Sudin Usgaonkar, Advocate for the respondent No.5. Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 17th March, 2008 P.C. Heard. Perused the affidavit filed by the Chief Officer. Since the Municipality has already dismantled the road which was sought to be constructed through the open space reserved in accordance with the provisions of law and in the affidavit they have assured that it would be maintained as an open space in terms of law, the grievance of the petitioner is adequately met with. Needless to observe that the assurance by the Municipality that the open space would be maintained as such in terms of law, would be a sufficient assurance to the petitioner that the Municipality would not create any such nuisance in the open space which is not permissible in law, including the construction of a road. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. ssm.