SM 1 905.ao.1150.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1150 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1532 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1150 OF 2011 Mr. Mohd. Ismial Mujbul Haque Siyari ....Appellant. Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. ....Respondent. ____________ Mr. Anamika Malhotra for the Appellant. Ms. K. K. Soraan for the Respondent-BMC. CORAM: R. M. BORDE, J. DATED : OCTOBER 19, 2011. P.C.: The appellant is taking exception to the order passed by the Judge, City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai in Notice of Motion No. 793 of 2009 in L. C. Suit No. 1268 of 2009 on 27/28th July, 2011 and 30th September, 2011. I have perused the order and heard submission of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. The allotment letter/ possession receipt annexed to the plaint are stated to be forged one and as they do not bear signature of the appropriate authority who was empowered to sign the documents. There is an affidavit placed on record of the officer, who is stated to have signed those two documents. In the affidavit it is contended that the signatures appearing on the allotment letter/possession receipt are his signatures and the same are forged. Considering the fact that the documents annexed to the plaint, which are basis of the claim lodged by the plaintiff SM 2 905.ao.1150.11 appear to be are forged, prima facie, the learned Judge of the Trial Court was justified in refusing to grant interim protection to the plaintiff. I do not find any perversity or illegality in the order passed by the Trial Court. 2. The Appeal from Order is devoid of substance and stands dismissed. In view of the disposal of the Appeal from Order, Civil Application does not survive and stands disposed of. (R. M. BORDE, J.)