IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 8654, 8657, 8658, 8659, 8660 and 8661 of 2011. Date of decision: 30.09.2011 1. CWP No. 8654 of 2011 Ishwar Dutt Verma vs. State of H.P. and ors. 2. CWP No. 8657 of 2011 Trilok Singh vs. State of H.P. and ors. 3. CWP No. 8658 of 2011 Deep Chand Katoch vs. State of H.P. and ors. 4. CWP No. 8659 of 2011 Sanjana Rani vs. State of H.P. and ors. 5. CWP No. 8660 of 2011 Shaloo vs. State of H.P. and ors. 6. CWP No. 8661 of 2011 Surjeet Kumar vs. State of H.P. and ors. Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioners: Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG and Mr. J.K.Verma, Dy. AG for the State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral): The petitioners in these petitions are aggrieved since they have been replaced by the private respondents. The petitioners are PTA appointees and the private respondents are regular appointees. According to the petitioners, they can work only in the school(s) where they were appointed, whereas the private respondents, being regular appointees, can work in any open vacancies. In case the petitioners can 2 point out any suitable vacancies, where the private respondents are willing to be accommodated, the petitioners may point out the same before the second respondent along with willingness letter(s), in which case, the second respondent will take appropriate action within another one month. In case the petitioners are otherwise eligible, they may be continued in the resultant vacancies till they are otherwise replaced by regular appointees. 2. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Ahuja) September 30, 2011 Judge (BSS/pankaj)