1 S.A.200/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 200/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5536/2011 BHIMRAO S/O ANANDRAO PALVE AND OTHERS VS. ANIL S/O SURYAKANTRAO PATIL Mr. Milind K. Deshpande, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.V.D. Salunke, Advocate for respondent sole. CORAM : A.V. Nirgude, J. DATED : 16th June, 2011. ORAL ORDER: 1. Heard. 2. This second appeal is filed against the concurrent finding of the lower Court that the respondent / plaintiff could prove not only his title but his possession over the suit land. On the basis of this finding, the Court below passed the decree of perpetual injunction. The appellants took up a defence in written statement that the boundaries of the two pieces of land purchased by the respondent / plaintiff were incorrectly shown. The dispute between the parties, it appears, was about a small piece of land admeasuring 11 R purchased by the respondent. It seems that the appellants were trying to claim that they are in possession of that piece of land. However, during the trial, the Court sent Court Commissioner to inspect this small piece of land and it was found to have same boundaries as are mentioned in the sale deed. The Courts below also recorded finding on the basis of evidence and 2 S.A.200/2011 the admission given by the appellant that this small piece of land is in possession of the respondent / plaintiff. No substantial question of law arises in this appeal. The appeal should therefore, fail. ORDER The appeal is dismissed. In view of this, Civil application is disposed of. [A.V. NIRGUDE,J.] ts k/2011/June16/sa200.11/