IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7735 of 2010 DEEPAK SAH @ DEEPAK KUMAR SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 22.3.2010 Heard Mr. S. Kumar Thakur, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with complaint case no. 11 of 2009 in which cognizance has been taken under section 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is husband of the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of the court towards some portion of the impugned order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Samastipur, to high light the point that attempt was made for restoration of relationship between the petitioner and the complainant. Unfortunately, despite endeavor made by the learned Sessions Judge complainant did not chose to live in the company of the petitioner as his legally wedded wife. Be that as it may, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M, Samastip0ur in the above noted case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2)Cr.P.C. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) M.Rahman