IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2011 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 8939 of 2011(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- V.S.MANOHARAN, S/O.SIVARAMAN, NEDUMPARAYIL, NOW RESIDING AT GOWRISANKARAM, CHOOLATHERUVU, MUTHUKULAM, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, S.P.OFFICE, ALAPPUZHA. 690 101. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OFFICE OF CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANNAR-689 622. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLICE STATION, MANNAR-689 622. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.M.CHARISMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: dmb WP(C).No. 8939 of 2011 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- P1 : COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- W.P(C). No. 8939 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of March, 2011. J U D G M E N T R.BASANT, J. The petitioner had allegedly borrowed an amount of Rs.10,000/- from one Sreedevi Rajan. According to the petitioner, two blank documents duly signed, were given by him as security for the same. He further alleges that a false complaint has been filed before the police by one Rajan, husband of the said Sreedevi. It is his present grievance that on the influence of the said Rajan, respondents 2 and 3 are compelling the petitioner to settle his claims with the said Rajan. The police are harassing the petitioner in an attempt to compel the petitioner to settle his dispute with the said Rajan. According to the petitioner, the petitioner is not liable to pay any amount and prays for issuance of a direction under Article 226 to safeguard the petitioner from the harassment on the part of respondents 2 and 3. 2. Notice was given. The learned Government Pleader appeared for the respondents. The learned Government Pleader submits that, it is true that a complaint has been received from W.P(C). No. 8939 OF 2011 2 the said Rajan. The police have examined the complaint. The police are satisfied that there is no commission of crime revealed in such complaint. The parties have hence been directed to resort to the Civil process for redressal of their grievances. The police shall not call the petitioner to the police station or take any action against him on the basis of the complaint lodged by the said Rajan, submits / undertakes the learned Government Pleader. 3. We are satisfied that the said submission of the learned Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents can be safely accepted. We are satisfied that no further action under Article 226 need be taken. 4. This petition is in these circumstances dismissed by accepting the submissions made by the learned Government Pleader. R.BASANT, JUDGE. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE. dmb