IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5393 of 2010 Between: G. Murali Goud … Petitioner And The State of A.P., Revenue Department, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri M. Uday Kiran for Sri Chandraiah Sunkara Counsel for the respondents: GP for Land Acquisition This Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5393 of 2010 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the Form-5A (Section 6) Declaration, dated 20.06.2009, including the petitioner’s land, without mentioning his Sy.No.10/1, extent Ac.6.02 guntas of Bonakallu (V & M), Khammam District and the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the Memo Rc.No.C1/2976/2007, dated 22.02.2010, as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the said Section 6 (Form-5A) declaration published on 20.06.2009 in respect of the petitioner’s land and set aside the Memo Rc.No.C1/2976/2007, dated 22.02.2010, issued by the 3rd respondent by declaring that Section 4(1) notification published on 13.06.2008 is lapsed.” At the hearing, Sri M. Uday Kiran representing Sri Chandraiah Sunkara, learned counsel for the petitioner, sought for permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel, interim order, dated 05.07.2010, is vacated and WPMP.Nos.6933 and 7207 of 2010 are dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 22.12.2011 ES