BEbORr" THL MADHYA P‘HDVSH ADP/:INIJE {FIVE TRIBUNAL PETITIOER N SanJeev Kumar alnh g ears, So ohm K N Jaged ged abbut 3‘ .glngh Dally Amln 1n the Water Resources Department Sub D1V1s1on Udalpur, Distrlct SarguJa - reeldent of Uda pur, Dlstrlct sargua i 1) s‘ta‘tie o ”ahya Pradesh throug the oecretar, D B 2 Chgpje’f Engineer, BILASPUR 3) Superintenélina Engineer, Hater Re~ sources Department Rehar Kanhar lrcle WBIKADUR 4) Lxecutlve hnglneer, Water esources Department Dlvmlon No 5) Sub D1v1slona7 Ofrlcer, Water Reso ces Department Sub D1v1slon U VERSUS RESPONDENTS / DEs' TAIL 1- PQt+4r111are A4: .ur APN PLICATIO .i.,, y / “ a 0 lr a; J. V ( d h y () Water Resources epartment Gavernment of N 13., HOPAL Hé s adeo‘ Bain, . ‘ N ( x , C x ( P 1 ( u DAIPU was?! aa‘w 11amW~Fsms n/zoog—q ,0n7000. »%>. WV T “J, q; ac) 200 g/ W sntum(W) mumfmi mmm - mathm 13E?m 3" withm SB: Hon. Mr. Justice Priti 1kel' Diwaker 28.08.2009: 1 Since no representation is hade on behalf of the petitioner even after issuance of fixed‘date SPC, this Court has n'o other option but to dismiss the petition for non prosecution. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution. However, the petitioner will have liberty to file an application for revival of the petition if occasion so arises. yri‘h‘ker 03W jgzi‘ée