1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.07.2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.8256 of 2011 R.Natarajan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Town & Country Planning, 807, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. 2.The Assistant Director of Town & Country Planning, Tiruchirapalli. Tiruchirapalli District. 3.The Assistant Director of Survey & Land Records, Tiruchirapalli, Tiruchirapalli District. 4.The Commissioner, Thuraiyur Municipality, Thuraiyur, Trichy District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 12.05.2011 in accordance with law. For Petitioner ... Mr.C.Selvaraj Senior Counsel for M/s C.S.Associates For Respondents ... Mr.M.Govindan, Special Govt.Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.D.Muruganantham Additional Govt.Pleader for R4 ORDER The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition to direct the respondents to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 12.05.2011 in accordance with law. 2. Heard Mr.C.Selvaraju, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader who takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.D.Muruganantham, learned Additional Government Pleader on behalf of the respondent No.4. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The petitioner claims to be a resident and purchaser of one of the housing site in a private lay out and his grievance is that the original developer has earmarked certain documents for play ground and for public purpose and that is misused by his son namely A.Kaliaperumal. The petitioner has given a complaint in the form of representation on 12.05.2011 to the first respondent pointing out that the public utility place has been misused by one or other persons. The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the first respondent to consider the said representation on its own merits. 5. Admittedly, the said A.Kaliaperumal is not before this Court. In such a view of the matter, the first respondent is directed to consider the representation on its own merits and in accordance with law. If the right of A.Kaliaperumal or any other third party will be affected, it is necessary that the authority should put such person on notice, so as to avoid the allegations of violation of principles of natural justice. It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion about the merits of the petitioner's claim and the Authority shall dispose the same on its own merits. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (T&P) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The Director of Town & Country Planning, 807, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. 2.The Assistant Director of Town & Country Planning, Tiruchirapalli, Tiruchirapalli District. 3.The Assistant Director of Survey & Land Records, Survey & Land Records, Tiruchirapalli, Tiruchirapalli District. 4.The Commissioner, Thuraiyur Municipality, Thuraiyur, Trichy District. +1 CC to Special Government Pleader (SR.No.24598) W.P.(MD)No.8256 of 2011 25.07.2011 gsr NSV/27.07.11/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/