IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2010 / 12TH JYAISTHA 1932 AS.No. 140 of 1996() -------------------- OS.89/1994 of SUB COURT, VADAKARA .................... APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: -------------- A.C.PHILIPS, S/O.CHACKO, AGED 66 YEARS, PLANTER, AALAKKOL, KAVILUMPARA AMSOM AND DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.V.K.BALACHANDRAN RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: --------------- KADALIKKATTIL K.C.JOSEPH, S/O.CHERIAN, AGED 60 YEARS, KAVILUMPARA AMSOM AND DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK. BY ADV.SRI.GEORGE CHERIAN THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02.06.2010 ALONG WITH AS NO.312 OF 1996, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON C.M.P.NO.941 OF 1996 IN A.S.NO.140 OF 1996. //DISMISSED// 02.06.2010. SD/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE SD/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE. /TRUE COPY/ THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- A.S.Nos.140 & 312 OF 1996 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. These two appeal arise from the decree in a suit for recovery of money. The plaintiffs has appealed against the decree to the extent it refuses relief and the defendant has challenged the decree granting relief. Learned counsel on either side states that the parties have settled the matter out of court. These appeals are accordingly dismissed as settled out of court. It is declared that the plaintiff will be entitled to refund of one half of the court fee, if the entire court fee is remitted on his appeal. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, Judge. kkb.7/06.