IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Habeas Corpus No. 10 of 2010 Bhopal Singh. ……Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …..….Respondents. Present: Mr. S.S. Adhikari, learned AGA for the State of Uttarakhand. Coram: Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. This is a habeas corpus petition. The State has filed counter affidavit and in paragraph 8 of the counter affidavit, it has been mentioned that First Information Report has been lodged by Mamta Devi respondent no. 5, wife of Ram Singh, who is brother of the petitioner Bhopal Singh, under section 498A IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act alleging therein that her mother-in-law i.e. Smt. Amba Devi with the help of other family members subjected her to harassment and cruelty by demanding dowry. On the basis of First Information Report, Smt. Amba Devi was arrested by police and was sent to jail but thereafter when Amba Devi moved bail application before the District and Sessions Judge, she was released from jail, on the basis of order passed by learned Sessions Judge granting her bail vide order dated 30.03.2010 and now Smt. Amba Devi is residing with her husband in her home. State has filed the copy of surety in bail matter pertaining to Smt. Amba Devi. 2 From the aforesaid discussion, it is quite clear that Smt. Amba Devi has already been released on bail and she has been residing in her home. On account of the aforesaid facts, present habeas corpus petition has rendered infructuous and is accordingly dismissed. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) (B.C. Kandpal, J) 30.04.2010 SKS