IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wn't Petition (C) No. ?§7} (7 /2oo9 PETITIONER Dhruv Narayan Miri, S/o Shri Kartik Ram Miri, Aged about 46 years, R/o Village Khapridih, Post Kumhari, Via Bilaigarh Tahsil Kasdol, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1) (State ofChhattisgarh Through: Secretary Department of Panchayat and Rural Development D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) 2) Director Panchayat Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3) The Collector Raipur, District Rajpur (C.G.) 4) Additional Collector, (Revenue) Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (C.G.) 5) Tahsildar Kasdol, District Raipur (C.G.) 6) The, Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bilaigarh, District Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA G22 Wm W {’L Mo ?<§b $.Eii. Her: 3§»€2-2$$§ $”~ $uciha Agrawal, caunseé far éhe iséeti‘doaer m hfé‘dok Ba a Govt Advcc' As per $hr§ Sarah iamexi $Wt. .Advocaée, the a$ airea¢ {$6933 x a“? irea y bea‘; is‘saed, 1P v§ew 3f e Sé&te, Eéamed g: we om fa the? may be avwabSe i0 éhe 9% :es’ wuer tne p oxii$iarrs o x ‘Ci Lé‘e abava sabm§sss¢la made by ‘z‘ne waved mume§ peamg Fm e peti€icner €his pe%§tiei1 Wig’ih E§be€ty ”gum remeér rpmv AL iaw. 'E‘he %§ber§y ES grantacé ag nrww far Accgi’dmgéy, ti a”eresa§¢ bar‘} m viaaw sfr‘abave ardeg §3e§2 §K yCSCV Cf g n Mahdraw e fc the 3 atalresgaendema eiection iced am mafscaiian m €ha ef§ect 5mg apgiicaiisras Siam Sd/— N. K. Agarwal Judge §e 8m Juwce n K A? amai men is dISm usea as w cifaW‘} wé": () .