WP(C) 1109/2005 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. I. Rafique, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. B. Das, learned Standing counsel, BTC and Ms. R. Chokraborty, learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate. This writ petition has been filed making a grievance against Annexure-6 order dated 27.01.2005 by which the service of the petitioner was placed at the disposal of Agriculture/ Irrigation Department with immediate effect. The petiti oner who was sent on deputation to the Panchayat and Rural Development Departmen t from the Irrigation Department by Annexure-1 order dated 04.02.99 was repatria ted to the parent department by the said order dated 27.01.05. According to the petitioner, since he has continued for a fairly long period of time in the borr owing department, he is required to be absorbed in the said department in terms of Annexure-5 Office Memorandum dated 19.07.97. It is the further case of the pe titioner that the impugned order dated 27.01.05 was issued only to accede to the request of the particular MLA who had addressed Annexure-7 letter dated 20.01.2 005 to the Minister of Panchayat and Rural Development Department by which a req uest was mate to repatriate the petitioner to the parent department from the bor rowing department. As a deputationist, the petitioner has got only a limited right. Irresp ective of any policy decision he cannot claim that having continued for few year s, he must be absorbed in the borrowing department. Mr. Das, learned SC, BTC, has produced the copy of the order dated 02.05 .07 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 620/2007 (Sri Arun Kumar Borah vs. State of Assam) in which under similar circumstances and noticing the aforesaid Offi ce Memorandum dated 19.07.97, it has been held that a deputationist cannot conti nue in the borrowing department and that on the strength of the said Office Memo randum cannot also claim absorption in the borrowing department. However, it was provided in the order that it will be open for the petitioner to file applicati on for regular absorption in the borrowing department. Considering the matter in its entirety, this writ petition is disposed o f in terms of the said order dated 02.05.07 passed in W.P.(C) No. 620/2007. Int erim order passed on 23.02.2005 stands vacated. At this stage, Mr. Das, learned SC, BTC submits that as against the said order dated 02.05.07, a writ appeal being WA No. 405/07 was preferred and same was dis missed by the Division Bench of this Court on 09.08.10.