IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49523 of 2008 SANTU KUMAR @ SINTU KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.12.2008 Heard Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. The case is under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. nor was he put on T.I.P. inspite of being in custody since 28.3.2007. There is no recovery of theft property from the petitioner. Co-accused Jaiki Singh named the petitioner in his confessional statement as his companion accused and he has been admitted to bail as per submission and also as per the report furnished by the List and Computer Section. Let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.D.J., Fast Track Court-IV, Nawada in S. Tr. No.327 of 2007/360 of 2007 arising out of Warsaliganj P.S. case no.27 of 2007. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )