IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** RSA No.3522 of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 09.11.2010 **** Ram Chander and another . . . . Appellants Vs. Dalip Singh and others . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: - Mr.Vijay Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL) This appeal arises out of the suit filed by the plaintiff for possession of the suit property by way of pre-emption claiming his superior right of being a tenant. Admittedly, he could not prove his status of a tenant over the land which has been allegedly sold by the vendor to the vendees. Once the plaintiff has failed to prove his superior right, there is no error in the judgment and decree of the Court below by which his suit has been dismissed. As a matter of fact, there is no question of law much less substantial involved in this appeal as envisaged under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. In view thereof, I do not find any merit in the present appeal and as such the same is hereby dismissed. No costs. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) November 09, 2010 JUDGE Vivek