IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA RSA No. 269 of 2010 Date of decision: 29.08.2011 ________________________________________________________________________ Jai Dev. .....Appellant. Versus Kaushala Devi. .....Respondent. Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, J. 1 Whether approved for reporting? ________________________________________________________________________ For the appellant: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondent: None. V.K. Sharma, J. (Oral). In this lis the parties are related to each other as husband and wife. The plaintiff-husband is laying challenge against the concurrent findings of fact handed out by both the courts below holding that the gift deed executed by him in favour of the defendant- wife in respect of a small piece of land, measuring 3 biswa 2 biswansi, is not revocable. He is laying stress on the testimony of the wife, wherein she has admitted that she does not intend to sell the gifted land and instead wants to put the same to use for construction of a house for her children. Such admission cannot be considered to mean that either the wife has admitted that the gift was conditional or if at all there was any such condition, the same has been violated. Above all, a perusal of the gift deed would go to show that no such condition was incorporated therein. 2. In view of the above, no substantial question of law arise for consideration in this appeal, which is accordingly dismissed. (V.K. Sharma) Judge 29th August, 2011 (virender) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?