IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.19666 of 2010 Date of Decision: November 08, 2010 Beant Singh & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Rajnish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Reply on behalf of the respondents has been filed in Court which is taken on record. It has been pleaded that out of 11 petitioners, 9 have been adjusted in their home districts. Two of the persons namely petitioner No.5 (Sukhjit Singh) and petitioner No.11 (Gurnam Singh) have been adjusted in District Kapurthala, and therefore, substantial relief has been given to the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that in view of the circumstances as CWP No.19666 of 2010 [2] brought out from the reply filed by the respondents, let the petition be disposed of as not pressed. 3. The petition is disposed of as not pressed. (AJAI LAMBA) November 08, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?