1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 207/2009 IN L.P.A. NO. 423/2008 IN WRIT PETITOIN NO. 3704/2008 (Shalini Narayan Chakranarayan vrs. Sau. Devata Bhaskar Jadhav and another) ................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... Shri H.R.Gadiya, counsel h/f Shri A.M.Ghare, counsel for petitioner, Shri P.S.Patil, counsel for Respondent nos.1 & 2 ... CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 18th JANUARY, 2011. Shri Patil, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 makes a statement that the entire payment has been made to the petitioner. Mr. Gadiya, the learned counsel holding for Shri Ghare, counsel holding for the petitioner, does not dispute this position. However, he submits that the statement has been made in para 3 of the 2 affidavit dated 6.10.2010 that, as regards the arrears of 6th Pay Commission payable to the petitioner, as per the Ordinance of the Government, the total amount of Rs.1,17,540/- (From January, 2006 to March, 2009 shown in the statement before the Hon’ble Court) would be deposited in the GPF account of the petitioner from time to time. He submits that some time bound direction need to be issued to the respondents. Shri Patil, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that up to date payment of the amount towards GPF to the tune of Rs.47,016/- has been paid and in view of the statement appearing in the affidavit, the amount which would become due and payable shall be paid from time to time. In view of the aforesaid statement, nothing survives in this contempt petition. The contempt proceedings are, therefore, dropped. JUDGE Rvjalit