IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.3095 of 2011 AJEET KUMAR RAI Son of Chandeswar Rai Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 09.03.2011 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner, who is husband of the deceased, is an accused in a case under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the deceased sustained burn injury while cooking meal. He further submits that the accused side did not dispose of the dead body rather they informed the Naihar people of the deceased. He further submits that most of the witnesses have been examined and only the informant and investigating officer remains to depose. Counsel for the State submits that the trial is expected to conclude shortly. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, the trial court (1st Additional Sessions Judge, Samastipur / his successor) in seisin of Patori P.S. case no. 62 of 2009 (S.T. No. 476 of 2009) is directed to dispose of the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order. If the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)