IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.727 of 2006 DR.BRAJENDRA KUMAR SINHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 11- 15.5.2008 Heard Mr. Kumar Brij Nandan for the petitioner, Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, learned Govt. Advocate no.I, and Mr. Madhuresh Prasad for the Accountant General. This application under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act has been filed by the petitioner of CWJC No.4598 of 2000, for the alleged non-compliance of the order dt. 24.2.2005 (Annexure 1) passed therein, whereby the order of punishment against the petitioner was quashed and the respondent authorities were directed to ensure full payment of his pensionary benefits and other money claims along with interest and costs in the manner indicated therein. The opposite parties have placed on record their show-cause. It appears to me on a perusal of the materials on record that the order in question has been complied with. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner raises a grievance that in view of the observations made in paragraph-9 of the judgment, the petitioner had submitted his application for commutation of pension on prospective basis, but the same has erroneously been granted retrospectively which is acting to his prejudice. I am afraid, this issue cannot be taken up in the present contempt application. 3. This application is accordingly disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to challenge the alleged action of the respondent 2 authorities in a duly constituted proceeding. mrl (S K Katriar )