IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 572 OF 2009 GOYANCHI NIZ MOGI (PRESIDENT JAMES FERNANDES) ... Petitioner Versus THE DIRECTORATE OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION PANAJI AND 6 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Fredrick Pereira, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. G. Shirodkar, Government Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7. Mr. M. Sonak, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr V. Naik, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Coram:- D. G. KARNIK & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 25th August, 2010 P.C. No research appears to have been made before filing of this PIL Petition. In view of this, the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition after presenting the technical data and research analysis. Though it is a PIL Petition, it is not yet admitted and taking into consideration the lack of technical data, we consider it appropriate to grant permission to the Petitioner to withdraw the Petition. Request is granted. The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh Petition supported by technical data and research analysis. The cost deposited by the Petitioner in the Petition be considered as security for a fresh Petition that may be filed by the Petitioner. If fresh Petition is not filed within 8 weeks, costs shall be forfeited and appropriated as costs of this Petition. D. G. KARNIK, J. F. M. REIS, J. at*