1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7539 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Mr. P.R. Basarkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.P. Phatke, AGP for respondents. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & N.D. DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE : 26TH AUGUST, 2009 PER COURT : 1. By way of present petitioner, the petitioner seeks to quash and set aside letters issued by respondent No.3 dated 14th November, 2008 and 8th December, 2008, thereby rejecting the application of the petitioner for the post of Krishi Sevak. It is the contention of the petitioner that though the petitioner was duly qualified, the application was not accepted. 2. From the perusal of page Nos. 21 and 23, i.e. Exhibit C and D to the petition, it would reveal that the petitioner had not annexed a copy of the certificate duly attested, certifying that he possesses the requisite diploma. 3. In the affidavit in reply filed by the respondent also, it is specifically stated that the petitioner had not annexed a copy of the certificate alongwith 2 the application. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference in writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, writ petition is rejected. [N.D. DESHPANDE,J.] [B.R. GAVAI , J.] grt/-