IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46221 of 2008 ANGAD KUMAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.12.2008 Heard Sri Surendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case is under different Sections of the Arms Act under peculiar facts that the petitioner had fired at Manoj Sao and injured him and when the persons of the locality attempted to catch him he went inside his room and closed the doors. The police came and it found that the petitioner was still in the room and was having pistol in his possession. The contention is that there might be some offence committed by the petitioner earlier to the alleged recovery and preparation of seizure memo but the fact is that there was no search or seizure and the police after arresting the petitioner wrongly and falsely, has planted a pistol and made out a case of recovery. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.P.Shukala, J.M. Ist Class, Danapur in Maner P.S.Case No.130 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )