AB 1525/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.UPADHYAY Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms. B. Sa ikia, learned PP, Assam. This is an application u/s 438 CrPC seeking pre-arrest bail by t he petitioner in connection with Panbazar PS Case No.151/10 u/s 420/468/471 IPC. An FIR was lodged by the Sr. Sub-Registrar of Kamrup Metropolita n District, Guwahati, alleging fraud in execution of Deed of Agreement No.9276/0 7, 9277/07 and Sale Deed No.9277/07 which were executed on 20.7.2007. However, the accused/petitioner is not named in the FIR. Learned counsel for the petition er submits that the petitioner is a practicing lawyer of the local Bar. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case leadi ng to lodging of the FIR and other materials available in the case diary, I am o f the considered view that there is no sufficient incriminating materials warran ting custodial interrogation and bail shall not adversely affect further investi gation of the case. Accordingly, it is provided that in the event of arrest of the p etitioner in connection with the aforesaid case, he shall be enlarged on bail of Rs.10000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority on condition that he shall appear before the I/O as and when required and shall cooperate with the investigation of the case. Bail application stands disposed of.