IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH JUNE 2008 / 15TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 30827 of 2004(T) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- M.J. SEBASTIAN, MUNDIYIL HOUSE, THALAYOLAPARAMBU P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.D.SOMASUNDARAM. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL) KOTTAYAM. 3. KOTTAYAM AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD., KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.K. RAVIKRISHNAN, ADV. SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR - R3. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.30827/2004-T: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 11/09/1991 SIGNED BY PRESIDENT OF THE KOTTAYAM CO-OP: AGRL. DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 05/02/1992 ISSUED BY R.3. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 16/10/1996 ISSUED BY R.3. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 29/04/1997 ISSUED BY R.2. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER G.O. (RT). NO. 50/99/CO-OP: DT. 28/01/99 ISSUED BY JOINT REGISTRAR. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.P. NO. 4483/99 DT. 03/12/2003. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE CHARGE MEMO DT. 21/07/2003 ISSUED BY R.3. EXT.P.8: COPY OF THE EXPLANATION DT. 29/07/2003 ISSUED BY PETITIONER. EXT.P.9: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DT. 06/02/2004 ISSUED BY R.3. TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// prv. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.30827 of 2004-T = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 5th day of June, 2008. JUDGMENT The petitioner, an employee of a co-operative society, challenges an order of suspension which, according to him, has been continued beyond statutory periods. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as of now, final orders on the disciplinary proceedings have been passed against the interest of the petitioner and the same are under challenge before this Court. Without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to prosecute all such matters, this writ petition is dismissed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/0906