THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. Writ Petition (M/S) No. 164 of 2006 (Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India) Ms. Richa Chadha, W/O Shri Gautam Chadha, D/O Shri Vinod Johar, R/O 104/24, Dehradun Road, Rishikesh. … Petitioner. Versus 1. Family Court Rishikesh. 2. Shri Gautam Chadha, S/O Sri Chaman Lal Chadha, R/O M-281, First Floor, Guru Harkishan Nagar, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi-87. … Respondents. Sri Kanwaljit Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Nand Prasad, Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No. 1. Sri V.K.Kohli, Sr. Adv., assisted by Sri I.P.Kohli, for respondent no.2. Dated March 24, 2006. PC: Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J.) Heard learned counsel. The petitioner has filed this writ petition to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the orders dated 21.3.2005 ( Annexure No.7) and order dated 1.10.2005 (Annexure No. 8) passed by the Judge, Family Court, Rishikesh, in matrimonial Case No. 2 of 2004, Ms. Richa Chadha Vs. Shri Gautam Chadha. By the impugned order dated 21.3.2005, the application (19-A) of the respondent no.2 was allowed and the petitioner-wife Richa Chadha was ordered to bring the children on the date fixed and permission was accorded to the father-respondent no.2 to meet the children till the decision of the suit No. 2 of 2004. By the order dated 1-10-2005, the recall application 26-C moved by the wife- petitioner was also rejected and the order dated 21.3.2005 was maintained. 2 On 25.2.2006, this Court had directed both the parties to appear in person and today, both the parties were present and they were directed to appear before the Additional Registrar for making efforts for reconciliation. The efforts for reconciliation failed. The Additional Registrar has reported that the compromise between the parties could not be materialized. During the course of arguments, both the parties have agreed for expeditious disposal of divorce petition pending between the petitioner and respondent within a stipulated period and the petitioner undertakes that she will come along with the children in the court of Judge Family Court, but she made a request that the permission to the father-respondent no.2 to meet the children may be given only in the Chamber of the Judge, Family Court. The submission made by the parties is innocuous and the impugned order dated 21.3.2005 passed by the respondent no.1 is modified to the extent that the petitioner will bring the children before the court of Judge, Family Court at least three times within a period of three month and the respondent- father is permitted to meet the children in the Chamber of the respondent no.1. If the petitioner complies with the order of this Court, no contempt proceeding shall be initiated against the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of finally with the above observation. (B.S. Verma, J.) RCP