IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.21 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.01.2011 Bahadur Singh . . .Petitioner Versus Murari Lal . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr. R.N. Moudgil, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Jain, Advocate, for the respondent/caveator. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This revision petition is filed by the tenant against the concurrent finding of fact recorded by both the Courts below on two grounds of ejectment, i.e. non- payment of rent and bona fide necessity. When the learned counsel for the petitioner failed to convince this Court to disturb the finding of fact, he prayed for sometime to vacate the tenanted premises. Since the landlord is on caveat and is present in the Court, it was put to his counsel, who agreed to a period of six months to be given to the petitioner/tenant to vacate the tenanted premises, however, learned counsel for the respondent/caveator, after consulting his client, states that the permission may be granted to the petitioner/tenant to vacate the premises after the expiry of six months subject to his furnishing an undertaking in this regard and also to make payment of the entire arrears of rent @ Rs.1,800/- per month. This proposal is accepted by learned counsel for the petitioner/tenant. In view thereof, this revision petition is dismissed and the petitioner/tenant is directed to vacate the tenanted premises on or before 31.07.2011. This order shall operate subject to filing of an undertaking by the tenant in this Court within a period of 2 weeks from today about the vacation of the tenanted premises on or before 31.07.2011 and also on making of payment of the entire arrears of rent @ Rs.1,800/- per month within a period of 4 weeks from today. January 04, 2011. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vivek JUDGE