IN THEU10H COURT<0>FCJfi[£tAmSGARHA¥BIV^raK (CHHATTISGARH) Q^ Bencff ^'/ /2011. :^ Contempt Case (C) No. (Arising out of or6^ dated 15T04.11 passed in writ petition~(S) No. 2^12/2011 by Hon'ble High Court.) PETITIONERS: ^&^ /><^^'""..^ ^^^ •»»»» ^" ^l. Ratan Sai, son of Sukhdev, aged about 36 years, Cook, residence of Pahadi Korwa Ashram, Lundra, (Nawapara), Block Lundra, Distrifct Sarguja, Chhattisggurh.. '^^t' -..-.A.^ 'c^3-"^\ --,'^ Y Sujeet R^n, son of K-abhudayal, aged about 35 years, Peon, residence ofAadivasi Block Ashram, Chitarpur, Block Lundra, Distiict Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 3, Ranichandra Rain, son of Dhursai, aged about 36 years, Wateiinan, residence of Pahadi Korwa Ashrgim, Lundra, (Nawapara), Block Lundra, Distaict Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 4. Gendraram, son of Mohanlal, aged about 30 years, Waterman, Aadivasi Block Ashram, Sasouli, Block Lundra, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. F. Tulsed Rgmi, son ofDheer Sai, aged about 25 yeM-s, Cook, Pahadi Korwa Ashram Bardih, Block Lundra District Sarguja, Chhatdsgarh. s ^6. Shivcharan Ram, son ofDuhan Ram, aged about 35 years, Peon, Aadivasi Girls Ashram, Karoli, Block Lundra, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. Respondent: (Conteninor): 7. , Mohan son ofJagsai, aged about 38 yearts, Cook, Pahadi Korwa, Ashram. Silsila, Block Lundra, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. Versus 1. M.S.Paraste, Conimissioner Tribal Welfare Departxnent, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Shrikant Dubey, Assistaiit Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Departenent, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CQNSTITimQN QFINDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OFTHE CONTEMFT OF COURTS ACT. ^' r"; ^ 3?^ ^r t^ii^ ^m^T^r^iN» y/ -ysf -^jpT^p?, •^ti.^cFTg', t^roy Cov^-C^^[c)\^A\\/2^{\ T?1^1T^^t^""7-'-"-:-'--->"^-""-"^-^200 s^ '^Wi C^s^'? ^^iT^^t^^^r ^N^h ^F^? ^r t^zt ^T^R ^ ^rri 3TI^T irivasTava,a37 SB : Hon'Dle snrj Manindra Mohan 23-11-2011 Shri C.J.K. Rao, counsel for the| petitioners. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitio|iers submits that an order was passed by this Court in a batch of writ petitioi|i filed by the petitioners on 15-04-2011 directing the concerned authority to d^cide the petitioners' representation with regard to their claim of minimum wag^s, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of submission of representation. jlt is submitted that after the order was passed by this Court, the State Gov^nment issued a memo on 23-04-2011 (Annexure C-3) to the respondent No.1 been granted in respect of 250 post^ submitted that even thereafter, the orcj with, till date, though, the period of 8 w^eks has lapsed. The representation of thepetitic] Secretary of the Department and the] also to the Assistant Commissioner. Tj record the receipt showing that th^ i/contemnor informing that sanction has of Peon for grant of pay scale. It is ler of the Court has not been complied >ners would show that it was sent to the Commissioner, Tribal Development as lough, there is no acknowledgement of receipt from the office of the Commi^sioner, the petitioners have placed on order of the Court along with the representation has been sent by regisljered post. Therefore, in the absence of there being any document of receipt) of representation, instead of, issuing notice at present, the petitioners are dfrected to submit their representation in the office of respondent No.1 under |acknowledgement and the respondent No.1 shall comply with the order. If no ()rders are passed on the representation within a period of 8 weeks from the dat^ of receipt of representation, this Court would be constrained toinitiate contem With the aforesaid direction, t\\e petitjonjs_finally disposed off with libertyto revive, in case, eventualityari^^es. ^n^m ^NN g^n^r, WRt^n^—i<s/140—2/201 ia rt proceedings against the respondents. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge -1,50,000.