c^p ; ^rz5 iB^a 3 f !C;S"EJ<:>"'1; wsi'tistc nTW,{" (!6 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. S/L{& /2009 PETITIONER ^yy <*•-' ..-•" v:^ ^ .?>••'' ^ RESPONDENTS Janak Lal Rangari, aged 52 years, S/o. Shri R.D. Rangari, U.D.T. Govt. Middle SGhool, Nayapara, Balod, Distt. Durg. (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education Department Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) -2. District Education Officer, Durg, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, QUO-WARRANTO. ORDER/DIRECTION IN THE LIKE NATURE 1) PARTICULARS QILTHE-M"cun"*~- HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGASW : BILASPUR WRiT PETITiON (S^ N0. 5148 OF 2009 Janak Lai Ranaari RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattfegarh & Another (Writ petition under Articie 228 of the Consfitution of Sndia) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Presenf:- Shri Rahul Birthare, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adv. General with Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Pane! Lawyerfor the Stats. ORDEIKOPEAU (Passed on this 10m day of September; 2009) 1. Heard learned counsei for ths parties. 2. Learned counsei appearing for the peiitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contsst this petition on merits at this stage; however, he seeks liberty to mato a representation to the respondent authorities, withm a period of one week, to consider his case on humanitarian grounds. 3. Shri Thakur, iearned Dy. Adv. Generai appearing with Shri Bhaduri, tearned Pane! Lawyer for the State submite that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with iaw and on its own merits, within a period oftwo weeks from the date of receipt ofthe representation. 4. in view of foregoing, according to the tearned counsei appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 5. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. However, it is made ciear that there shail not be anv coereive steps aflainsf the Gowri petih'oner tiil disposal of the representation. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge