.^! ~.^ ,^'pffi-^ sn^iqn (<-iisk ^STT 3TI^T ^qf^i 'S^ ^w^^, »Ti1y'is, [«<<rliy^< W1CIT ^WeSi 3TI^ITT^T ('^fg^T) WBIWdfOT 3II^?t W.P. B Ku. Vaaijlita Parukar, D/o. Shri. Bajrang Prasad Panikar, |Aged about 30 years, R./o M-10, Sector- Oppo^ite Slioppmg Complex, Avaati Vitiar, Distnct I-taipur (CG) yersus RBSPONDBNT! 1. State of Dcpartia (CG) Chhattisgarh Through Secretarv Hoiae |:nt, DKS Bhawau, Mantralaya, Raipur 2. Director General 3. State Committ Scrutinv Iristitute' Raipur (< Shri Anup Majunidar, co^insel Shri YS Thakur, Dy AG lt»rfhe State. Detitioliiei Grievance of the Detitiot appoiatajient to tlic post of Si|i are not issuuig her appouitiiieit produced caste certificate duly ^>i<il<n<^i ^i^cii' "^ f^<t <f^1^R ^affilHSIl^l No.S889/200i General of Police, Of&ce of Du-ector ^>f Police, Raipur, District Raipiir (CG) I|,evel High Power Caste Scrutiay •e, Through-Director, High Power Caste Committee, ('l'ribal Kesearcli & 'l'raitiing University Cam.pus Raipur District tG) Writ Petitioa under Article 226 of the Constitutioa of India Jlttli for Voe petitioner, is that she was dulv selected for tb Inspector, however, fhe respoudents it order on fhe eround that she has not verified by State Level High Power Caste XI-HC—78 3D^T ^T'f^fW 'cT^n 37T^?T »>*^ICh 's^ "4i<<iCT'Li, »Ti1yi(o, fs<di'yy,< «<l*1CtTtb*1i«b sn^i Tra^ ('^3^1) TOnw^itoati^f 2- Scrutuiy CoDiniittee/responden petitioner has already approac] Gonunittee lias refused to enter veriftrinK ber caste ui absence of alon On fhe otlier haad, State/respoudents subruits fh4 before tlie respondent No.3 fo^ uenod of 15 davs froni todav shaU lie entertained and decid41 Scrutiay Coniiaittee/ responden) witli law, withiu a period oftwo| appUcation. LTnhn; In view of above subniiss fhe instaiit petition is disposed suitable appUcatiou for detern^ High Power Caste Scrutiay period of 15 days froni today al(j on fHing such application, fxpeditiously, preferably within| ofreceipt oftlie application, in. ^ <^Tqf?l41l ^IIHt'lT ^f T^^ <f<1t^I< ^aTfinsn^r t No.3. He fiirther submits tliat the iccl fhe sayi Com.niittee; however, the :ain the application of fhe petitioner for docunients prior to fhe year 1950. tearaed counsel appearing for fhe t if tlie petitioner fUes an applicatiou deteriniaation of her caste wifhui a with CODV of tilis order, tlie saiae by fhe State Level High Power Caste No.3, on its own inerit, in. accordaace nionths froin the date of receipt of the Eons of leamed counsel for the oarties, bfwith liberty to flie petitioner to move iluiinK her caste before fhe State Level (pomm.ittee/respoD.dent No.3 witttui a |ne with ceitified copv offhis orier, and the said Com.inittee shaU. decide it a period of two uionfhs froin fhe date kccoidance with law. Sd/- ', DbirendraMishra