•tCi Cl 'i^si^'i'-^^sv 'bFi—i ^L»^^a3rwr ^0s ^j l^jjj ^HR^A^ SSS^J2-1^: -! n^?i^ is^a, ^s'.nr^.g •^W31si»-rs.wav'i^ir^. »5si'1sn^ ^i Praaushan RO'KO Sangarsh Samittee (Poliution Control Tilak Committee) nin BilasDurfC.G.^ i\tsaiulai i_u^^: &fl.i-—, n.;—4~ Hli i 3 ivnilc^, u'lau-. 1. State o^ Chhattisgarh tnrough fcUiisici' y industnes commerce 2. 3 n i/ snswan, Ksipur ^w.vs.) Collector, Bliaspur (C.G.). Regional Officer Chhattisgarh $nvirGnm6ni uonsSivsi.iOn Board Biiaspur Teh. & Distt. Biiaspur (C.G.) Letter Petition i Ws^. | Shri Praveen Das, tearned Deputy Government Advocate forthe State. ihri G.S. Aarawai, learned Senior counsei with Shri K.R. Nair, .iearned counsel for M/s Radha Madhav stries Private Limited. i :ll (su •Aprsii^yas} The following order of the Court was passed. by •v Guota, C.J. This writ ;oetition came to be reaistered on the letter sent bv some members of a Committee Known as Pradushan Roko miTimi V- Sangarsh Samittee alleoino that Radha Madhav Sponge Sron Industn,' is causing pollution in that !oca!ity. 2. Shri G.S. Asrawal, iearned Senior Counsel for Radha Madhav Sponge Iron Industr^' submlts that durlng the pendency of the writ petition necessary steps hve been taken by t'ns industry to keep the poiiution levei wel! withln the permissib'e > !imits. 3. Shri Pravsen Das, learned Deputy Government Advocate aiso conftrms that Radha Madhav Sponge ironjndustry has taken requisite steps in that behalf. ; 4. In this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that no further monitoring of the matter in this writ petiiion, now, is rsquired. The writ petstion, thus, stands disposed of. ^L Sd/- ChiefJustice Sdf- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge 113.1.1