Civil Revision No.4546 of 2011(O & M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:28.07.2011 Sudhir Kumar Chhabra ....petitioner Versus Smt.Chander Kanta .....respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Sanjeev Walia, Advocate for the petitioner *** RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J.(ORAL): This is tenant's revision petition challenging the impugned orders of the authorities below whereby his ejectment has been ordered. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, when this Court was not inclined to interfere in the findings of the Courts below, counsel for the petitioner prayed that a reasonable time be granted to him to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlord. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner shall keep on paying the future rent, in advance by 10th of every month, regularly, to the respondent-landlady, till the date, he hands over the vacant possession to the respondent-landlady and the petitioner will also clear the arrears of rent, if any, within two months from today. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with the observations that the petitioner shall hand over the Civil Revision No.4546 of 2011(O & M) 2 vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlady on or before 31st, December, 2011 subject to his filing an undertaking before the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, within one month from today, to the aforesaid effect and also clear his arrears of rent and keep on paying the future rent as aforesaid. It is needless to say that the petitioner shall be bound by the submissions made before this Court on his behalf by the learned counsel for the petitioner for getting concession of time from the Court. The petitioner shall also be bound by the undertaking filed before the Rent Controller, Chandigarh and in case of any violation of the aforesaid, the eviction order shall come into force, immediately. In case, the petitioner fails to hand over the vacant possession to the respondent- landlady, on or before 31st December, 2011, as stated aforesaid, in addition to the execution of eviction orders, the respondent-landlady shall also be entitled to initiate contempt proceedings against the petitioner-tenant. Disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 28.07.2011 neenu