IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 24TH JANUARY 2008 / 4TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 2892 of 2008(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ ANTONY ISSAC, KADAKULANGARA (SANTHA NIVAS), CHAVARA, THEKKUMBAGAM VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY,KOLLAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.C.R.SIVAKUMAR SMT.G.VIDYA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THEKKUMBAGAM VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY,KOLLAM DIST. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.2892 of 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT Ext.P2 is an application made by the petitioner to the first respondent for registration of his birth. It is submitted by the petitioner that on receipt of Ext. P2, Ext.P3 report has also been obtained. Even thereafter, petitioner submits that neither the matter has been finalised nor the birth registered as applied by him. It is in this background, the writ petition is filed seeking an order directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P2 application in the light of Ext.P3 report. 2. Since Ext.P2 application has been made by the petitioner and according to the petitioner, Ext.P3 report has also been obtained by the first respondent, I do not see any justification for the delay in considering Ext.P2. Accordingly, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the first respondent shall consider Ext.P2 application in the light of Ext.P3 report and pass final orders in the matter. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE csl