IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4643 of 2009 NIDHI KUMARI Versus CHAIRMAN CUM DIRECTOR,PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Shambhu Prasad, Advocate For the Punjab National Bank: Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh-1, Advocate 2 24.6.2009 In the instant writ petition the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to grant education loan to her. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has competed in All India Management Aptitude Test (MAT) and has got admission in Okhla, New Delhi. The petitioner does not have enough liquid resources to finance her study and as such she approached the respondent nos.2 and 3 for grant of education loan to the tune of Rs.3,09,500/-. He further submits that other students who have competed in the examination have got education loan from other branches of the same Bank. He submits that pursuant to the query made by respondent no.2, as contained in Annexure-3, the petitioner has filed a detailed representation before him, as contained in Annexure-4. Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Bank submits that the papers of the petitioner are incomplete and if she files detailed representation along with all requisites papers including proof of income, proof of residence, indemnity bond on non-judicial stamp paper and photographs of student and parent, the same would be considered sympathetically. It appears that the petitioner is willing to submit all necessary papers and documents for sanction of her education loan. In - 2 - KHAN case the petitioner fulfills the due requirement, the Bank will consider the case of the petitioner sympathetically for sanction of education loan as has been done in the case of other students who have got admission in the same institute. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)