IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1431 of 2010 RINKU SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR 2 17.3.2010 Heard Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner ,Mr. Rajesjh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the informant as also Mr. Ram Priya Saran Singh, learned Additional P.P. for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case instituted under sections 376 / 511 of the I.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present case was filed after four days of the alleged occurrence and there is no explanation about delay in filing the present case. It is further submitted that the present case has been filed because of some previous enmity between the parties, and even according to prosecution case, hardly a case under section 354 I.P.C. is made out. Learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner but has fairly conceded that there was some delay in lodging the case. Be that as it may, in the circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks from today be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jamui, in Jhajha P.S. Case No.191/09 subject to the condition laid down 2 under section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. as also conditions that (a) one of the bailors must be Government Servant or close family member who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his relationship with the petitioner and (b) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned. AnilKr.Sinha (Birendra Prasad Verma,J.)