IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 12594 of 2008. Decided on : 8th April, 2011. Netar Singh ..…Petitioner. Versus State of H. P. and others …… Respondents. ___________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : None for the petitioner, though served. For the respondents : Mr. Anil Jaswal, Dy. A.G. for the respondents No.1 & 2. Respondent No.3 in person with Ms. Rita Goswami, Advocate. Justice V.K.Sharma, Judge (Oral) None appears on behalf of the petitioner who is duly served for today. 2. The petition has been filed on the following prayers vide para 7 (1) & (ii): “i) The respondent Department may kindly be directed to consider the applicant for the post of Whole Time Water Carrier as per the actual seniority list. ii) That the applicant may kindly be ordered to be promoted over and above the Respondent No.3.” 3. There is no reply as yet. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 4. However, since the petitioner has not come forward to prosecute the petition despite valid service and it is stated by respondent No.3, who is present in person that the petitioner has since been regularized as peon in the respondent-department, it appears that he is no more interested in prosecuting the present petition, which is disposed of accordingly. 5. The petition stands disposed of, so also pending CMP (s), if any. (V.K.Sharma.) Judge. 8th April, 2011. (jai)