1 BA-G-806.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.806 OF 2011 Harinder Balmukund Singh .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.807 OF 2011 Joginder Balmukund Singh .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Ms Vidhya Gaikwad for the Applicant. Ms P.P. Bhosale, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JUNE 29, 2011 P.C: These are two applications for bail by husband and brother-in-law who had been refused bail by me by the order dated 3-5-2011. Thereafter, the victim's mother-in-law was admitted to bail by this Court {Coram: A.M. Thipsay, J.} by order dated 9-6-2011, passed in Criminal Bail Application No.566 of 2011 {Saroj 2 BA-G-806.11 Balmukund Singh and others v. The State of Maharashtra). The learned Judge observed that the history of the incident given by the victim was consistent with the dying declaration and it would be hazardous to evaluate the conflicting pieces of material and attempt to ascertain which of them is likely to be true. The learned Judge observed that the material collected during the investigation was conflicting and therefore proceeded to admit the mother-in-law Saroj to bail. In the face of this, it would be impermissible to refuse bail to the applicants, whose case cannot be distinguished from that of Saroj except that they happen to be the husband and brother-in- law of the victim. The applications are allowed. Both the applicants be released on bail on their furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- each with one solvent surety in the like amount. The applications accordingly stand disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)