MW HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASFUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1841 of2008 Sudarshan Smgh Kausluk S/o Shn Pran Smgh Kauahlk, aged about 61 years Ass1stant Teacher» Government G1rls Pmnary School Janjgu Block ‘ Nawagarh. Dlstnct Tanjgu-Champa (C G) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secratary, School Education .Depamnent, D.K.S. Bhawm Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Dlstnct Education Oifxcer Dismci JanJgIr-V Champa(CG) ‘ 3. Tho Biock Fducatlon OEicer Block Nawagarh Dlstnct JanJgIr-Champa (C G 3 RIT FETITION UNDER AR I'ICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB Hon’hle aim Satish K Agggg! ma J. PETITIGNER RESPONDENTS resent: ohm Ashwanl shukla. Advocaie 101‘ the petmoner r ‘ V Shn Y " Thakur Deputy Adwcate Genera] w1th Shn Ajay Dwxvedl and Shrl M P § Bhatla, Deputy Government Advocates for the State/ " responoents. GRAL ORDER (Passed on 18m day of June, 2008) With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up forhearing‘fmany. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has obtained B.T.I. Examination certificate in the year 1975-76 on his own expenses. Learned counsel wither submits that the issue involved herein asto whether a' Teacher having B.Ed/D.Ed/M.Ed/B.T.I. is entitled to grant, of two advance increments as per circuiars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999r Learned counsei 3 further submits that this vexy issue is no longer res integral as the same has been settled by this Siourt in the matter of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR~CG . Municipal 96}, as well as by decision 7:iV// I? j, 9/5», P dated 15.12.2006 in passed in W.P.(S) No. 4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma v. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & another). On perusal of the pleaéings and documents appended thereto, it appears that the issue invoived has already been considered in the matters of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj and Gopesh Kumar Verma (supra), and the same has attained finality as no challenge has been made to the said decision in any superior Court. r In View ofthe above, the petition is allowed in the same terms i.e. the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments horn the date of declaration of B.T.I. Examination Certificate, subject to verification ofthe facts. No order asto costs. Sd/_ Satish K. Agnihntri l‘ l Judge x