IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-19772 of 2009 Date of decision : August 11, 2009 Hakam Singh ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. AK Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Sidharth Sarup, AAG, Haryana L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Hakam Singh has filed this petition for bail in case FIR No. 151 dated 21.4.2007, under sections 307, 324, 323, 506, 148, 149 IPC, Police Station Sadar Thanesar, District Kurukshetra. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. Petitioner was earlier on bail. He did not appear in the trial court on 21.4.2009 and therefore, his bail bonds were cancelled. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was in custody in some other case at Patiala since 1.3.2009 and was released from jail in that case on 5.5.2009 pursuant to order dated 4.5.2009, Annexure P/1 and therefore, the petitioner could not appear in the trial court at Kurukshetra in Criminal Misc. No. M-19772 of 2009 -2- the instant case on 21.4.2009. Learned State counsel on the other hand contended that even after release from jail at Patiala on 5.5.2009, the petitioner failed to surrender for two months and he was arrested on 6.7.2009. Keeping in view all the circumstances, the instant bail petition is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of trial court i.e. learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra. ( L.N. Mittal ) August 11, 2009 Judge 'dalbir'