IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 22982 of 2010 Date of Decision: 22.12.2010. Sumer Chand --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. R.N. Singal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.D. Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana and Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Advocate present in the Court have been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents no.1 and 2 to 3 respectively. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner had secured loan of Rs. 1,93,908/- from the respondent-Corporation in the year 1989. Admittedly, there are some dues which are payable by the petitioner on account of default in payment of the installments and the vehicle of the petitioner has been declared as 'N.P.A'. The petitioner has applied for benefit of the Exit Scheme which was formulated by the respondent-corporation. The petitioner has also placed reliance upon a judgement of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported as 2009 (8) SCC 257 titled as Sardar Associates Vs. Punjab & Sind Bank. The petitioner has also served legal notices (Annexures P-8 & P-9) in this respect but no decision has been taken thereon till date. CWP. No. 22982 of 2010 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the legal notices served by the petitioner, referred to above. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the legal notices served by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 22.12.2010. lucky