^ y PAG£^0- c -l ••N^1 SingleBsnch BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A.NO. jTyA- /2004 MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE OKUI OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 hlN K. APELLANTS )EFENDANTS ^ A¥ ^•/^)/ w RESPONDENTS ^LAINTIFFS .^y^' .^ "^7 .' cyy/ >-^w .^' y /• VERSUS ^ Mahru, S/o. ofLala Gond, aged about 54 years, and Mahesh, son of Lala Gond, aged about 50 years, Both are resident of village - Birkha, Tahsil - Chhuikhadan, District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Anil Kumar, son of MadhO Prasad, aged about 31 years, (^ 2.K^ Kumari Bhumika, ^ /> daughter of Sunil, aged about 17 years, Minor ^ 2KH Bhanu, son of Sunil, ^ / aged about 9 years sbc months, son of SunU, Minor 2G<; Rudri, son of Sunil, aged about 8 years, Minor, All minors already represented through their natural guardian - mother Smt Divya Bai, —-.==...=^;=:,..^-=s?y,.^, ^t .M ^GENO. ••*•- ^ wife of Late Kumar Tamrakar Sunil Vinod Kumar, aged about 32 years, son of Shri MadhoPrasad, i>> hs t5 5. (-> 6. ^" ^> ^ 9.. Jitesh Kumar, aged about 30 years, son of Shri Madhoprasad. Shailesh Kumar, aged about 28 years, son of Shri Madhoprasad Praveen, aged about 26 years, son of Shri Madho Prasad Rampaal, aged about 24 years, son of Shri Madho Prasad Shyamlal, aged about 20 years/ son of Shri Madho Prasad. Rampyari Bai alias Lusubai, aged about 55 years, widow of Late Madhoprasad. All are Tamrakar by caste- and resident of village Pandariya, Post Gandayee, Tah. Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^ RESPONDENTS .DEFENDANTS N0.3,4 8&5 10. ^- M.P. State (Now Chhattisgarh State), through : the Collector, Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh). :^ ^'?': 1 ^ 'c PAGENO-? Tif»<»^» 11. RaMi Bai, widow of Late Dashru Gond, resident of village Atariya, Tah. Chhuikhadan, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 12. r^ Tijiya Bai, wife ofJaytu Gond, resident of village Sikola^Bhattha, Tah - Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) Being aggrieved by the order of remand in C.A. ^-"";' .... •; :' ! ./ No. 6-A/2000, passed on 03^3.2004, by the learned Additional District Judge, Khairagarh, District - ^l^f^T ferricf» ^W 3??f?T sb^Jcb Sahu ($) Hr^^T %»IT^ '3'ST r^l^I<n4, ^Tll-H^ifo, f^RTR^!; ^^...h^-.......^L ,e.»,»Z.^^.e—...o«..,.»......«.,.......^.,..., ^l ^^r^^K (^35(^) ^<nW^"cT 3!TI^T S.B. Hon'bte Shri Jusfice N.K. Aabrwal 29.04.201Q Shri RN Jha, Advoeate for| appellants. Shri Dashrath Prajapati,| Advocate for respondent No. 1| to9. Leamed counsel appearing for appellants submitsj that this appeal may bej disposed of because v^th the| passage of time this appeal hasj become infructuous. Accordingly, the appeal j^ dismissed as having becom^ infructuous. No order astcj costs. .^ '^R?f?nft?r 1tyR^ff "^ 'fe^ ^^K ^3tRTH3?I^T Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge CTff^T sN^T ^IT^^, ;T^^{ R —FS/147—2/2010 —1,00,000.