IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39776 of 2010 Arjun Prasad Yadav, Son of Late Gopi Prasad, resident of Village- Ram Nagar, Police Station- K.Nagar ( Champa Nagar), District- Purnia --------------------- Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 14-12-2010 Heard Sri Binod Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Md. Sufiyan, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. The sole petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Sessions Trial No. 1067 of 2010 arising out of K.Nagar (Champa Nagar) P.S.Case No.188 of 2010 for the offences under Section 302 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. At the very outset, it was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that F.I.R. was lodged against unknown and the attesting witness at subsequent stage disclosed the names of four persons as accused in the present case including the petitioner. Out of four accused persons, three have been extended the privilege of bail by this Court on 10.11.2010 Vide Cr.Misc.No.38307 of 2010. Since other three accused persons having similar allegation have been extended the privilege of bail, there is no reason to deny the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, 2 F.T.C.No.5, Purnia in connection with S.Tr.No.1067 of 2010 arising out of K.Nagar ( Champa Nagar ) P.S. Case No. 188 of 2010 subject to the condition that on each and every date the petitioner shall be physically present before the learned trial court, failing which his bail bond shall stand automatically cancelled. However, in the special exigency, he may remain absent on particular date provided that he is granted permission by the trial court. With the above observation and direction, the bail petition of the petitioner is allowed. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)