1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 250 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 653 OF 2007. Nancy Ramchandani & Ors. ..Petitioners. v/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ..Respondents. And M/s. Halford Realties Pvt. Ltd. ..Applicant. .... Mrs. N. Mandhyan, i/b. S.M. Associates, for Petitioners. Mr. Amir Arsiwala, i/b. Thakore Jariwala & Assoc., for Respondent No.3. Ms. T.H. Puranik, for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 31ST AUGUST 2010. P.C. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. 2. The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner states that he has no objection if the Chamber Summons filed by the Applicant is allowed. Chamber Summons is accordingly, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendments to be carried out within a period of one week from today. 3. Chamber Summons is accordingly,disposed of. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]