IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9416 of 2009 1. RAM ISHWAR RAI 2. CHANDESHWAR RAI Both are sons of Sri Dhanu Rai, resident of village – Mansurpur, P.S. Sarai, District – Vaishali. …. Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …. Opp. Party. ----------- 03/ 10.06.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to correct the averment made in paragraph 1 of this application. Petitioners are accused in a case under Section 414 of the Penal Code as three stolen motor cycles were found and seized from their house. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that on account of the failure of the authority to mention the place of seizure in the seizure list the learned Sessions Judge has observed in his order refusing bail dated 4.2.2009 that the petitioners may renew their prayer for bail after remaining three months in jail custody from today i.e. 4.2.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application in the light of the observation made by the learned Sessions judge. He is allowed such liberty to avail the benefit under the observations of the learned Sessions Judge. DKS/ (V.N.Sinha, J)