IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28887 of 2010 CHANDRA BHUSHAN RAI @ BHUSHAN RAI, SON OF BALESHWAR RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – DANIYALPUR, P.S. TEGHRA, DISTT. BEGUSARAI. ------ PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. UMESH KUMAR JHA, SON OF BALESHWAR NONAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHERPUR, P.S. VIDYAPATI NAGAR, DISTT. SAMASTIPUR. ----- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 4. 08.03.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 29.5.2010 passed in Sessions Trial No. 336 of 2009 by the Additional Sessions Judge-V, Begusarai, by which he has rejected an application for discharge. It has been submitted that final report was submitted in the matter whereafter even though the court accepted the same with regard to two other co-accused persons against whom there was similar material, he only differed with regard to the petitioner. The further submission is that there are overwhelming materials in the case diary to suggest that the petitioner was not involved in the occurrence. Since the court at the stage of framing of charge is not empowered to hold a mini trial nor conduct a roving and fishing enquiry, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)