C^Vy^^ BENCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl N0. ^U^ / 2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF THE INDIA PETITIONER y,e-c? ^0^ ^,.^3,6? ....--^^•I'^l^' ..t'--""" ^'^.^•••"" V—- ,^9 ,&...-•" RESPONDENTS Raju Gupta S/o. Shri Runu Sao Gupta, aged about 37 years, R/o. Ramnagar, Arpa Colony, Kargi Road Kota, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) J2. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITLONER. \^ fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B: Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra W.P.CONo. 3364/2010 PETITIONER : RajuGupta Versus RESPONDENTS : Reg^onal Transport Authority Bflaspur (C.G.) and Another. Appearance: Shri Anshul R. Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Government Advocate for the State/respondents. WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORALORDER (09.07.2010) In this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has raised a grievance that he has moved an application vide Annexure P-1 on 06/04/2010, before respondent No.l for grant oftemporary stage carriage permit, on the route Kenda to Takhatpur via Belgahana, Ratanpur, Kota, Daija, Belpan with one return trip daily. Further, till date the application has not been disposed ofbythe respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that his only prayer in the writ petition is for issuance of a direction to the respondents to consider the application for grant oftemporary stage K carriage permit in accordance with the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Act and the rules fi-amed therein. ^?Tn'^ f^-«^, ^/./ ;^^' \fc \l^-^i 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that if the applications are complete in all respect and are pending before concemed autfaority, it shall be communicated to the authority to dispose of the application within reasonable time from the date of production ofcertified copy ofthe order by the petitioner. 4. In view of the statement made by leamed counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.l to consider and decide the petitioner's application dated 06/04/2010 within a reasonable time from the date of production of certified copy ofthis order by the petitioner. 5. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion about the right and entitlement of the petitioner and that the concemed authority shall examine the application on its own merit and dispose ofthe same in accordance with law. sViant ^as^1-^^s^^3 ^