1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 117 OF 2010 (Dulichand Barku Shahare & Anr. vs. Dist. Dy. Regr., Coop. Soc., Gondia & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JANUARY 08, 2010. Heard Shri Tambde, learned counsel for the petitioners and Smt. Khade, learned AGP for respondent No.1. The contention is, the Election Programme does not prescribe 15 days time between the date of publication of accepted nominations and the date of withdrawal and it is violative of Section 152-A of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The other grievance is in relation to voters list. Shri Tambde, learned counsel argues that the number of wrong entries were pointed out and though Returning/ Election Officer is competent to consider the same, he has erroneously refused to look into that challenge by holding that he has no jurisdiction. I have perused writ petition, particularly para 8 and also the Election Programme. The challenge is to the voters list which raises disputed questions of fact and hence in view of the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Kulwant Singh Parmar vs. Sher-e- 2 Punjab Cooperative Housing Society Limited, reported at 2007 (6) ALL MR 650, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter on that count. The stage of scrutiny of nomination papers or rejection thereof as yet is not reached and it is not clear whether provisions of Section 152-A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, would be required to be looked into. In any case, Respondents No. 1 & 2 can even now take necessary steps in this respect. I, therefore, find that at this stage, no case is made out warranting any interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. A copy of this order be furnished to the parties. JUDGE *GS.