IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4388 of 2010 RAJENDRA THAKUR & ORS. . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. . ----------- 03. 04.05.2011 The show cause is stated to have been filed on 3.5.2011. The same is not available on record. The office shall place it on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly acknowledges that the representation filed by the petitioners along with a copy of the Court’s order did not annex or rely upon any similar orders as had been submitted before this Court. He however submits that similar orders of this Court were available to the Chief Engineer, who had forwarded the same. The representation of the petitioners in pursuance of the order of the Court does not even refer to that fact. Now that the opposite parties have passed a fresh order on 4.2.2011. There is no occasion to proceed further in the contempt proceeding, if aggrieved, remedy lies in a fresh writ petition only. The application stands disposed. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)