[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1919 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1919 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1919 OF 2005 Mr. Ramesh Vasant Jukar .. Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Ms. Seema Gupta h/f Mr. Ashok Saroagi for the petitioner. Mrs. P.H. Kantharia, A.P.P.for the State. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA P. DESAI & CORAM : SMT. RANJANA P. DESAI & CORAM : SMT. RANJANA P. DESAI & ANOOP V.MOHTA JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA JJ. DATE : 14TH OCTOBER, 2005. DATE : 14TH OCTOBER, 2005. DATE : 14TH OCTOBER, 2005. P.C. . In this writ petition the petitioner has made grievance about alleged high handed acts of the police. It appears that the petitioner has addressed representation, dated 3rd February, 2004 to the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, about the said alleged high handed behaviour of the police. It is prayed in the petition that the respondents be directed to state on oath, as to what has happened to the said representation and as to why the said representation has not been considered till this date. It is also prayed that the respondents be directed to take necessary steps and enquiry be conducted in respect of grievance made in [2] the representation by the petitioner being representation dated 3rd February, 2004. 2. In response to the petition Shri Shamrao Jedhe, the then Assistant Commissioner of Police, Pydhonie Division, Mumbai, at present attached to Traffic Control Branch, Mumbai, has filed a detailed affidavit. The affidavit indicates that after receipt of the representation dated 3rd February, 2004, the necessary departmental enquiry has been conducted by the deponent of this affidavit. He had submitted his report and finding to the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone II. It appears that the Deputy Commissioner of Police Zone II has arrived at the conclusion that there is no truth in the application made by the petitioner. It is therefore, clear that the grievance made by the petitioner in his representation dated 3rd February, 2004 has already been looked into. The petition therefore, has worked itself out. Hence, it is disposed of as such. (SMT. RANJANA P.DESAI, J) (SMT. RANJANA P.DESAI, J) (SMT. RANJANA P.DESAI, J) [3] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]