BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.10886 of 2011 1. J.ISRAVEL @ MURUGESAN 2. I.JEYA @ JEYAM 3. A SAMUVEL ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1,2 & 6 Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TUTICORIN DIST, CR.NO.41 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.RAJARAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.1,2 and 6 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 120(b), 419, 468, 471 and 420 of IPC in Crime No.41 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are in no way connected with this case. The petitioners 1 & 2/A-1 and A-2 are husband and wife; A-2 is working as a Village Assistant. 3rd Petitioner/6th accused is the father of A-2. There is a civil dispute pending between the petitioners and the de facto complainant. In that aspect the petitioners are entitled for anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the allegations mentioned in the complaint against the petitioners 1 & 2 (A-1 and A-2) are serious in nature and it is to be investigated further. He would also submit that if for any reasons, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners suitable conditions may be imposed. 5. Considering the submissions made by both sides, I could see that https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ there are serious allegations mentioned in the complaint as against the petitioners 1 & 2. Considering the age of the third petitioner/A-6 this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the third petitioner/A-6 only. Accordingly, anticipatory bail is granted to the third petitioner/A-6 with the following conditions i) Accordingly, the third petitioner/A-6 is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tuticorin and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition. (ii) that the first petitioner/A-6 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. (iii) the third petitioner/A-6 shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. (iv) the third petitioner/A-6 shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 20/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TUTICORIN 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TUTICORIN DIST, 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. A.RAJARAM Advocate SR.No.44372 GH : 22.12.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10886 of 2011 Date :20/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/