IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 895 of 2011 Smt. Bhagirathi ….Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand & others …Respondents. Present : Mr. Shivanand Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar Bisht, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State in Court today is taken on record. Heard Mr. Shivanand Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand. The prayer in this writ petition was for payment of leave encashment and General Provident Fund. According to the respondent, during the pendency of the writ petition, the same has already been granted to the petitioner. This fact has also been admitted by the counsel appearing for the petitioner. The writ petition is therefore disposed of as having become infructuous. Counsel for the petitioner says that he may be allowed to amend the writ petition as family pension has not been given. The petitioner is at liberty to move another writ petition, if the cause of action so survives. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 1.9.2011 Avneet