IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI MONDAY, THE 27TH JULY 2009 / 5TH SRAVANA 1931 LA.App..No.512 of 2008 (C) ------------------------------- LAR.88/1995 of ADDL.SUB COURT,KOLLAM .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT --------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT -------------------------------- 1. SAINABA BEEVI, W/O.NOORUDEEN KUNJU, MANGALATHU THEKKATHIL, KADATHAR KUNNAM, WEST KALLADA. 2. SAFIYATHU BEEVI, D/O.NOORUDEEN KUNJU, MANGALATHU THEKKATHIL, KADATHAR KUNNAM, WEST KALLADA. 3. ABIDA BEEVI, D/O.NOORUDEEN KUNJU, MANGALATHU THEKKATHIL, KADATHAR KUNNAM, WEST KALLADA. 4. SHAHUBANATHU BEEVI, D/O.NOORUDEEN KUNJU, MANGALATHU THEKKATHIL, KADATHUR KUNNAM, WEST KALLADA. 5. NASEEMA BEEVI, D/O.NOORUDEEN KUNJU, MANGALATHU THEKKATHIL, KADATHAR KUNNAM, WEST KALLADA. 6. RASHEEDA BEEVI, D/O.NOORUDEEN KUNJU, MANGALATHU THEKKATHIL, KADATHAR KUNNAM, WEST KALLADA. LA.App..No.512 of 2008 (C) 2 7. SALABUDEEN, S/O.NOORUDEEN KUNJU, MANGALATHU THEKKATHIL, KADATHAR KUNNAM, WEST KALLADA. 8. MAJIDA BEEVI, D/O.NOORUDEEN KUNJU, MANGALATHU THEKKATHIL KADATHAR KUNNAM, WEST KALLADA. ADV. SRI.M.SHAHEED AHMAD FOR R.1-8 SRI.M.RISHIKESH SHENOY SRI.RENJITH THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/07/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & P. Q. BARKATH ALI, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ L. A. A. No.512 of 2008 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J The Registry reported to us that no appeal is preferred against Ext.A1. But we find that the submission of the learned Senior Government Pleader Mr.Basant Balaji that an appeal L.A.R. No.1194/05 was actually filed by the Government against Ext.A1 is correct. In fact, L.A.R No.1194/05 preferred against Ext.A1 was dismissed by another Division Bench of this Court. In view of the dismissal of L.A.R.1194/05, we do not find any reason for entertaining this appeal. 2. This appeal will stand dismissed. Registry is directed to be careful while giving reports to this Court L. A. A. No.512 of 2008 -2- in response to directions realising that incorrect reports are likely to result in pecuniary loss to the state. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE P. Q. BARKATH ALI JUDGE kns/-