CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4835 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4835 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: APRIL 28, 2011 Manoj Kumar & others .....Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana for the State. Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate, for respondent No.4. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Some residents of Village Ghamroj, Tehsil Sohna Distt. Gurgaon, have filed this writ petition to make a grievance against the allotment of 100 sq. yards plots in terms of policy formulated by the State of Haryana. The grievance of the petitioners is that some ineligible persons have been included in the list of allottees. Counsel CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4835 of 2011 -2- for the petitioners has highlighted from the list as to how even persons, who were not below the poverty line, have been included in the list. Counsel submits that even Backward Class category has been included in the list though the scheme was originally meant for Scheduled Castes category only. In my view, the Backward Class persons may also be covered, if they are below poverty line. The dispute in regard to eligibility, can not appropriately be gone into in exercise of writ jurisdiction. However, the matter can also not be left like that. It will, therefore, be appropriate to relegate the petitioners to make a detailed representation before the Deputy Commissioner, Gurgaon with all grievances, who shall look into the same and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. It is made clear that if the Deputy Commissioner finds that any ineligible person has been included in the list, he would be in a position to cancel his/her allotment and necessary consequence, thereof, would follow. Of- course, Deputy Commissioner will be required to pass any order adverse against any person only after affording him/her an opportunity of hearing. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. The petitioners, if so advised, may submit their writ petition as a representation and if they do so, the same would be treated as a representation on behalf of the petitioners and dealt with. April 28, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE