IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1624 of 2011 SURYADEO KUMAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 12.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report but his name surfaced in this case in the confessional statement of co- accused Sri Paswan @ Umashanker Paswan. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that statements of some witnesses were recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. but the aforesaid witnesses have stated only to this extent that petitioner had been seen in the company of the deceased prior to the alleged occurrence. So far as recovery of so-called mobile and motorcycle is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the aforesaid recovery has not been made from conscious possession of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )