IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10431 of 2008 TAQUI AHMAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 23.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner earlier approached the High Court for payment of dues for effecting supply of certain items for election purpose. The respondent authority made payment to the extent they accepted the liability. Some part of the claim is rejected. Even a contempt application was filed which stood disposed of vide annexure-14 to the writ application. Petitioner is back again against the rejection of part of his claim which is misplaced and not justified. Since the petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and there is resistance as well as dispute having been raised against the liability the Court is not willing to adjudicate the matter as it requires extensive evidence as to what is payable and what is not payable. If the petitioner is not satisfied with the decision of the respondent he has common law remedy. This writ application is disposed of with the above liberty. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)