1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 36. WP/1110/2010 (THE PRESIDENT GODAWARI TANTRA VIKAS MANDAL NANDED V/S SHIVAJI GUNVANT INDRALE AND ANR) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.G.O.Wattamwar, Adv., h/f Mr.S.G.Rudrawar, Adv., for petitioner. Mr.A.V.Patil, Adv., h/f Mr. V.D.Gunale, Adv., for R.1. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:22/10/2010 1. Heard. The alleged oral termination of respondent no.1 was challenged by him in an appeal No. 68/2007 before the Presiding Officer, School Tribunal wherein, by judgment dt.31.7.2008 the authorities directed reinstatement of respondent no.1 with back-wages indicating the management petitioner to submit pay bills of the backwages and other benefits recoverable by respondent no.1. The management questions the same on the ground that no hearing was given, there was no termination of respondent no.1 and, consequently, the matter to be remitted. 2. On the above backdrop and in the light of letter addressed by the 2 institution - management, at page no. 54, dt.24.8.2007, it is explicitly clear that writ petitioner - management does not dispute employment of respondent teacher; only questions the oral termination dt.3.11.2007. Since the respondent has established before the authorities that he was prevented from acting in the management as teacher, though he attended the school, this was sufficient for the learned Presiding Officer to accept the oral termination. The order under challenge does not call for any interference. The writ petition is rejected. No costs. 3. The writ petitioner management shall be entitled to move the requisite pay bills regarding the back-wages payable to the respondent no.1 in the writ. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/1110-10wp