IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17148 of 2011 1. MD. HASNAIN @ HASNAIN 2. SHAMIM AKHTAR 3. ABU GHALIB @ GHALIB ALL THE ABOVE ARE SONS OF MD. HUSSAIN 4. PRINCE ROSE @ PRINCE SON OF MD. HASNAIN @ HASNANI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PUTIMARI JAGIR P.S. KOCHADHAMAN, DISTRICT KISHANGANJ Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 02.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State as also the Informant. It is submitted that the present complaint has been filed for ulterior purpose as the daughter of the petitioner no. 1 was being teased by the accused persons and as such, the petitioner no. 1 has filed a complaint case as contained in Annexure – 2. Learned counsel for the State as also the informant submits that the allegation made in the first information, it would appear that the allegations are supported by the injury report. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner no. 1 and 4, namely, Md. Hasnain @ Hasnain and Prince Rose @ Prince be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 25 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. As regard the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner nos. 2 and 3, namely, Shamim Akhtar and Abu Ghalib @ Ghalib is rejected. However, in case, petitioner nos. 2 and 3 surrender in the court below and makes and application for regular bail, the same be considered in accordance with law on its own merits without being prejudiced by the present order. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)