IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2008 / 18TH POUSHA 1929 CRP.No. 2024 of 2003 ------------------------------ OP(ELE)106/1998 of ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA ..................................... REVN. PETITIONER: RESPONDENT: --------------------------------------------------- POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD., LOCAL OFFICE, NANGIARKULANGARA, KAYAMKULAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI (SR.) RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER: ------------------------------------------ UNNIKRISHNA PILLAI, S/O. NARAYANA PILLAI POONTHOTTATHIL VEEDU, ELAMPILLIL, NOORANADU, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J ===================== C.R.P. No.2024 OF 2003 ===================== Dated this the 8th day of January 2008 O R D E R Notice dispensed with. This revision petition is preferred against the award of the Addl. Distirct Court, Pathanamthitta in O.P.(Ele.)No.106 of 1998, whereby an additional compensation of Rs.22,500/- is granted. A perusal of the award would reveal that out of 34 cents of land owned by the claimant, 7 coconut trees, 3 cashew trees, 9 jungle jack trees, 7 jack trees and saplings of rubber, jack tree, mango tree, pepper vine, etc. are cut and removed. The court did not grant any additional compensation for the trees cut, but found that the extent of the land affected is 30 cents. Though it is contended that the value per cent is Rs.10,000/-, the land value is fixed at Rs.3,000/-. Thus a total amount of Rs.22,500/- has been awarded. Even applying the principles laid down by the Apex Court in the decision reported in KSEB v. Livisha(2007(3) KLT 1(SC), the amount appears to be only just and reasonable which does not call for any interference. Therefore CRP 2024/2003 -:2:- C.R.P. is dismissed. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE Cdp/-