S.B.Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7728 of 2009 Rampati and others vs. State of Raj. ---- 8.10.2009 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Mr.Pankaj Gupta, for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Shrimal, Public Prosecutor. --- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. This bail application has been filed under section 438 Cr.P.C. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioners contended that the accused petitioners have been falsely implicated by the police. Cross FIR has been filed in between the parties, hence the accused petitioners should be relased on bail. The learned Public Prosecutor and the Investigating Officer, present in person contended that specific role has been assigned to all the accused petitioners in the case. Injuries have been received by both the sides. The Investigating officer stated that injured received a fracture and section 326 IPC has been added. At this stage, this court cannot take notice of the arguments raised by both the sides, as it will prejudice the either case of the parties. Hence the bail application under section 438 Cr.P.C. filed by the accused petitioners is rejected. (Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J. OPPareek/