1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. First Appeal No. 724 of 2009 State of Maharashtra and anr v. Uttam and anr -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr A.B. Patil, Adv for applicant VIDC Mr K.S. Dhote, AGP for appellant Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 18th December 2009 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is not disputed that similar matters have been remanded to the trial Court for disposal according to law after allowing acquiring body-VIDC to take part in the proceedings. Copy of one such order being common order dated 25th November 2008 in First Appeal No. 888 of 08 and connected appeals has been placed before me for my perusal. 2. In view of settled legal position, VIDC is allowed to take part in the proceedings. Impugned judgment and order is quashed and set aside. Land Acquisition Case is remitted back to the Reference Court for decision according to law. The trial Court shall allow VIDC to file Written Statement and cross- examine the witnesses already examined. Both the parties are 2 allowed to examine additional witnesses if they so choose. Parties to appear before the Reference Court on 18th January 2010. First Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. Judge. Hsj