HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 6th May, 2009 First Bail Application No. 358 of 2009 Order on the bail application of the accused. Amit Farasi S/o Vijay Kumar …….. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party Case Crime No.234 of 2008 U/s 498-A, 304-B I.P.C. and ¾ D.P. Act Police Station Doiwala District Dehradun Hon’ble J. C. S. Rawat, J. Heard Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the accused/applicant; Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. for the State; and perused the record. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; perusal of the documents filed by the parties; perusal of the post mortem report; perusal of the inquest report; the fact that the F.I.R. did not contain that demand of dowry was made; the fact that it only indicates that the husband & other family members were not happy with the dowry which was given to them and they were stating that some articles have not been received by them; and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case for bail. Let the accused/applicant Amit Farasi be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 06.05.2009 Shiv