IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.765 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:10.02.2011. Tilak Raj ...Petitioner Versus Shree Gaushala Association/Trust, Bhiwani ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Sudhanshu Makkar, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. Tenant is in revision against the orders of the Courts below by which he has been ordered to be evicted from the shop in question as he has ceased to occupy it for a continuous period of four months prior to the filing of the eviction petition without any reasonable cause. The Courts below have basically relied upon the report of the Local Commissioner (Ex.P7) and that of the Process Server (Ex.PX) to hold that the tenant has ceased to occupy the demised premises continuously for a period of 4 months. No evidence has been led by the tenant to the contrary. In view of the finding of fact recorded by the Courts below in this regard, I do not find any merit in the present revision petition. Hence, it is dismissed in limine, however, without any order as to costs. February 10, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE