1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 41/2010 Chandrakant Gopinath Gupta and another ..versus.. Rajeev Kamalkishor Biyani =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-== Mr. H.A.Mohta h/d Shri R.L.Khapre, Counsel for Applicants. Shri C.A.Joshi, Counsel for respondent C ORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 27th JULY, 2010. P.C. Heard finally. 2) The defendant raised plea of limitation desire that the plaint be rejected in terms of Order 7, Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure. 3) The learned Judge on factually analyzing the situation found, the issue of cheque to cover limitation warrants evidence and it will not be possible to decide the same based on the application. 4) In the situation, I do not see any illegality on the part of the learned Judge in rejecting the application moved by the defendant. C.R.A. disposed of. 5) Needless to indicate, the learned Judge will certainly frame issue of limitation. (K.U.Chandiwal) JUDGE. Rvjalit