THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO :1137 of 2010 DATED: 27-04-2010 Between: Bovilla Sivaramireddy. ..... PETITIONER AND Chikala Suseela. .....RESPONDENT ORDER: Petitioner filed O.S.No.10 of 1998 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Rajampet against the respondent for the relief of specific performance of agreement of sale. The suit was dismissed for default on 18-09-2000. Thereupon, he filed I.A.No.27 of 2001 under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC with a prayer to restore the suit to file. The I.A. was dismissed for default. An application was filed to set aside the order passed in the I.A. Since there was a delay of 2454 days, he filed I.A.No.1005 of 2001 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Through its order, dated 09-11-2009, the trial Court dismissed I.A.No.1005 of 2001. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The only ground urged by the petitioner is that he went to the State of Maharashtra in relation to contract work and thereby he could not pursue the proceedings effectively. Even if it is a fact that the petitioner has gone to another State, nothing prevented him from pursuing the proceedings through his advocate. It is not as if the suit reached the stage of trial and was dismissed on account of non appearance of the petitioner. There was default on the part of the petitioner, both in pursuing the suit as well as the application filed for restoration of the suit. The trial Court has assigned cogent and valid reasons in support of its order. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J 27th April, 2010. Tsy