WP(C) 4614/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. DK Jain, the learned counsel for the petitione r and Mrs. Phookan, the learned State Counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 as well as Mr. Goswami, the learned Standing Counsel, Water Resources Department appearing for the respondent Nos.2 to 5. The petitioner in the present petition has claimed that an amount of Rs.19,28,388/- is due and payable for the works done by him pursuan t to the various work orders issued by the Department. According to the petition er, though the bills were submitted the said outstanding amount has not been pai d by the respondent Authorities. The matter in issue in the present writ petition has alr eady been answered by a full Bench decision of this Court in Tamsher Ali -Vs- St ate of Assam & Ors. reported in 2008 (4) GLT 1. The learned counsel for the parties, therefore, submits that the present writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the direction cont ained in the aforesaid judgment. Keeping in view the aforesaid submission, the present wr it petition is disposed of with a direction to the Chief Engineer, the responden t No.3, to make an enquiry as to the entitlement of the petitioner as claimed an d if upon such enquiry, it is found that any amount is due and payable, the name of the petitioner shall be registered in terms of the direction contained in Ta msher Ali case and necessary payments shall be made as soon as the petitioner’s turn comes. The petitioner shall serve a copy of this order along wi th the writ petition and its annexures on the Chief Engineer for doing the needf ul in terms of this order. A copy of this order be furnished to the learned Standin g Counsel, Water Resources Department.