IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA. CWP No. 4981 of 2009. Decided on: 22.2.2010. Ravi Kumar. …Petitioner. versus State of H.P. & another …Respondents. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General No.1. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG and Mr. J.K.Verma, Dy. AG. For Respondent No.2: Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. The petitioner submits that the similarly situated persons have been granted benefit and those were covered by Annexure P-3. He is also entitled for the same benefit as was given to the persons covered by Annexure P-3. It is for the petitioner to bring this fact into the notice of the competent Authority by filing representation. The competent Authority will consider and look into the matter in accordance with law. The benefit as given to the similarly situated persons be given to the petitioner also. Appropriate action be taken within a period of one month on production of copy of this order along with the copy of this writ petition. Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- With these observations, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Justice Kurian Joseph ), Chief Justice. ( R.B. Misra ), February 22, 2010 Judge. ( tr/ks)