1 CA-5641.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5641 OF 2010 Madhurima Nitesh Minocha .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent S/Shri M.S. Mohite with C.K. Pendse for the Applicant. Ms Alpa T. Javeri, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: DECEMBER 22, 2010 P.C: 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by the applicant who is alleged to have branded her child servant with a hot iron and beaten her with a belt because the servant had, by mistake, kept the iron in such a position that it injured the applicant's daughter. Given the nature of the allegations made and considering the statement of the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant regrets whatever has happened and would be ready to do anything to ameliorate the wrong done by her to the child servant, the applicant's being in custody for the purpose of 2 CA-5641.10 investigation may not be necessary. In view of this, in the event of her arrest the applicant be released on bail in C.R. No.461 of 2010 of Powai Police Station, Mumbai on her furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.25,000/- on the condition on the condition that the applicant shall deposit with the trial Court a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- within a period of two weeks, which amount the trial Court shall invest in such interest earning deposit in any nationalised so as to enable the trial Court to allow appropriate withdrawals from the said amount for the treatment and education of the child. This deposit as well as the withdrawals that may be allowed would be without prejudice to the rights of the parties to pursue the other remedies that may be available to them in law. 2. The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and she shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the trial Court. 3 CA-5641.10 3. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicant may furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 4. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)