IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2721 of 2007 SHEOJI SAH & ANR Versus SITA RAM SAH & ORS ----------- 3. 5.5.08 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. By order dated 2.12.2002 passed in First Appeal No. 363 of 2001 two weeks’ final time was allowed to the appellants , who are the petitioners herein, to remove the defect, failing which the matter should be placed before the Bench for orders. The defect was not removed as a result of which the appeal was placed before the Bench on 28.3.2003, on which date, as prayed for by learned counsel for the appellants, four weeks’ time was granted to carry out the said order dated 2.12.2002, subject to deposit of costs with the Secretary, Patna High Court Council of Legal Aid and Advice. The orders were not complied with leading to M.J.C.No.1090 of 2003 for modification of the said order. The same was disposed of by order dated 25.9.2003, whereby the time granted by the said order dated 28.3.2003 was extended up-to 3.11.2003, subject to further payment of costs with the Secretary, Patna High Court Council of Legal Aid and Advice. The order dated 25.9.2003 was also not complied with leading to the present M.J.C. 2 No.2721 of 2007. By order dated 21.2.2008, passed in the present application, learned Registrar (List & Computer) was directed to examine the matter and submit report whether or not the present application for restoration is maintainable. The report submitted by him states that an application for restoration of another restoration is not maintainable. Furthermore, as is evident from the narration of the facts, it is a case of gross negligence and laches on the part of the petitioners/appellants. This application is accordingly rejected. ( S.K. Katriar, J.) Vinay/