IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 19839 of 2004 Between: Ravula Harinadh, S/o Papa Rao, R/o Bhadrachalam, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State Bank of Hyderabad, rep. by its Chief Manager, P& SB, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad-1. 2 The Branch Manager, State Bank of Hyderabad, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to call for the records from the respondents and issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring that the order passed by the 2nd respondent in proceedings No. F/BM/199, dated 14-9-2004 advising not to open J.D (Janata Deposit) new accounts henceforth as illegal, unjust, contrary to law, in violation of mandatory provisions of Section 33 (1) (a) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947, discrimination, amounts to unfair labour practice and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and grant all consequential benefits, and pass such other order ororders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.K.JAYAPRAKASH RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.E.MADAN MOHAN RAO The Court made the following : ORDER: After filing the writ petition, the impugned order, dated 14.09.2004 was withdrawn by the 2nd respondent himself by an order, dated 19.11.2004. In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous and it is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ____________ 01-12-2004 klp To 1 The Chief Manager, P& SB,State Bank of Hyderabad, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad-1. 2 The Branch Manager, State Bank of Hyderabad, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District. 3 2CD copies