FAO No. 1848 of 2006 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 1848 of 2006 Decided on :01-12-2008 Sh. Attru Ram ....Appellant VERSUS Smt. Kanta Devi and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr. S.M.Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Sarika, Advocate for Mr. Ashwani Arora, Advocate for respondent no.1 & 2. Mr. D.D.Gupta, Advocate for respondent no.4. MAHESH GROVER, J The only challenge raised in the present appeal by the appellant is that he is not liable to satisfy the award as the vehicle was sold to one Sushil Kumar vide agreement to sell dated 31.12.96 and the vehicle was also delivered to him. Thereafter, the vehicle was sold to one Smt. Rama Rani, respondent no.5. According to the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, the liablity to satisfy the award has to be of the registered owner which in the present case is the petitioner. In this view of the matter, the findings recorded by the Tribunal cannot be faulted with. However, the appellant is granted the liberty to realise the amount FAO No. 1848 of 2006 2 from the respondent no.5 as it has been stated before the Court that she has taken the vehicle on superdari. There is no merit in the appeal. Dismissed. December 1 , 2008 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge