IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO SECOND APPEAL Nos. 873 & 961 OF 1999. Between: Pendayala Venkata Subba Rao … Appellant-defendant V/s. Kaki Gopalakrishna Murthy … Respondent-Defendant Counsel for the appellant In SA.No. 873 of 1999 : Sri C. Raghu Counsel for the appellant In SA.No. 971 of 1999 : Sri C.Damodar Reddy Counsel for the respondent In SA.Nos. 873 & 961 of 1999 : Sri T.S.Anand The court made the Following : Judgment (follows 2nd page) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO SECOND APPEAL Nos. 873 & 961 OF 1999 COMMON ORDER : SA.No. 873 of 1999 is filed against the judgment and decree dated 08-9-1999 passed in AS.No. 22 of 1997 by the learned I-Additional District Judge, West Godavari district at Eluru, reversing the judgment and decree dated 09-10-1996 passed in OS.No. 145 of 1997 by the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Eluru. SA.No. 961 of 1999 is filed against the judgment and decree dated 08-9-1996 passed in AS.No. 20 of 1997 by the learned I- Additional District Judge, West Godavari district at Eluru, reversing the judgment and decree dated 05-10-1996 by the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Eluru. 2. When the matters are listed under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of Sri C. Raghu, the learned counsel for the appellant in SA.No. 873 of 1999 as well as there is no representation on behalf of Sri C. Damodar Reddy, the learned counsel for the appellant in SA.No. 961 of 1999. 3. Under the above circumstances, the second appeals are dismissed for default. No costs. ________________________ JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO 18-03-2011 I s L THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO SECOND APPEAL No. 873 & 961 OF 1999 CIRCULATION No.43 Date:18-03-2011 Court Master : I s L Computer No. 43