BtBEn Second Apoeal No. 233/20Q7 snch: uo",'bte Shri Dilie Raosaneb Deshmykh, Rajendra Kumar S/o Late Mahadeo Frasad Shrivastava, Aged about 55 years, r/o Bazar Para, Belghana, Tahsil Kofa, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 'plajnffi [i~ iwiiiUii [Defendant No. 2. Shambhu Prasad S/o Late Jagdamba Prasad Shrivastava, aged about 55 years r/o Bazar Para, Belgehna, Tahsi! Kota, District Biiaspur C.G. Smt. Sushiia Bai, aged about 75 years, Widow of Late Mahadeo Prasad Shrivastava, Aged about 55 years r/o Sazar Para, Belgehna, Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur C.G. Memo of Second Apoeal Under Section_100 oftheCode of Clvii Procedure. 1908 Shrl A.R.K. Rao, counsel for the appeliant. QraLOrder (Passed on 4th day ofJuly, 2007) Heard on admission. The appeliant is aggriev'ed by the judgment and decree dated 20.03.2007 passed by 8" Additioral District Judge, F.T.C., Bilaspur in .'" J^-sLk^^"^' —'— ^ Civii Appeal No. 16-A/2004 whereby the'r,-decree for permanent Injunction passed by the Court of Civi! Judge, Ctass-11 in Civii Suit No. 133-A/2002 against the defendant was afflrmed while dismissing the aopeal oreferred bv the apDeitant/defendant No. 1. 2. I have perused the impugned jud of trial Court. s. a^ 3. Both the Courts below have recorded a concurrent finding of fact while granting permanent injunction against the appellant. No perversity Is seen in the finding of fact thus recorded. No substantlal question of law thus arises for determination in this appeai. The appeai is dismissed at the stage of admission. 4. Consequentiy, !.A. No. 1 for grant of stay is aiso dismissed. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Jydge Kvr