I 1 a ^ sls HiGH COURT OF W^-f^».F^.i S/-C iPsstefanRiiari Bd Writ Petitior, (C) No.4497 of 2011 1. Ghuran son of iate Budhram, aged about 54 years, Occupation Serviee, Respondents 2. 2. 3. 7. sihari So of Late Budhram, aaed about 45 years, Qccupation agricuiturisi, Soth ara Residsnt of Viilage Jagdishpur, Poiice Statlon and Tahsl! Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) Vsrsus Q'itate of Chhatti^arh, Through: the Sesjieiciiy, Gcpesiti'iient of RevenL's, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Coiiiector, Surguja, DistricS Surguja (C.G.) An 2imbi Sub-Divisionai Offlcer (Revenue), Ambikapur, Distrtot Surguj'a (C.G.) Tahsildar, Ambikapur, Surguja (C.G.) Dtstrid: 5. Sukhdev Son of Raghuvar, aged about 65 years, Occupatton Agrioulturist, 6. Majhiyain widow of Sadhuram, aged about 60 vears, Occupation Agricutturist, Uma Bai, v«'ifeof iate Dayaram, ag&l about 40 years, OccupaSien Agriculturi^. 8. SahdevSon of Dayaram, agsd aboiA 17 years, Occupation Student, 9. Ku.Devmuni daughter of iate Dayaram, aged about 13 years, ;upaiton Siudent, Occ', 10. Janardan Son of Dayaram, aged about 10 ysars, Occupation SSudent, 11. Ravishankar Son of Dayaram, agea' about 8 years, Qccupation Student, Respondenis No.8 to 11 are minor, through their natural guardian mother Uma Bai wife of iate Dayaram, "^'y ^- ul Aii are Resideni of Viliage Jagdishpur, Police Station and Tahsil Ambikapur, Dlstrict Surguja (C.G.) 12. Champa Bai daughter of Sadhuram, aged about 45 years, Occupation Housewife/care of Sahaasram Rajwar Son of Shivpurihs Rajwar, Resident of Village Adaohl, Police Statlon Darima, Tahsii Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) (Writ Petition under Articie 226 ofthe Constiiutlon of indta) Mr.V.KPandey, counsel forthe petitioRers. l\4r.Sushii Dubey, Qovemment Advocafe for respondents (SB: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) QRDER (13-9-2011) 1. By this wrrt petftion under Article 226 of the ConstituSion of india the petitioner has prayed for issuance of directson to respondent No.4 So decide the review petition pending before it in Revenue Case No.01/A- 6-A/2009-10 in Ghuran and anothsr v. Sukhdev and others. 2. OR due consideration, the writ petition is disposed of wlih the direction that respondent No.4 shaii decide the aforesaid review petitlon as eariy as possibis preferabty wlthin a period of six months from the date of fiiing of a copy of this order on behaif of the petitioners. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge