IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M 8573 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 22, 2010 Het Ram Saini .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.R.S.Sihota, Sr.Advocate with Mr.B.R.Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of direction to respondent nos.1 and 2 for conducting an enquiry. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Commissioner of Police, Faridabad, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 11.2.2010, Annexure P2, already made to him by the petitioner. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e.,Commissioner of Police, Faridabad, to take appropriate action expeditiously, in accordance with law, on application, dated 11.2.2010, Annexure P2, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioner. 22.3.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge