1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3747 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3747 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3747 OF 2007 IN IN IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 248 OF 2007 CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 248 OF 2007 CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 248 OF 2007 Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune -II .. Appellant. vs. M/s. Vasantdada Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., .. Respondents. Ms. Neeta Masurkar with S.D. Bhosale with Ms. Ms. Reetuja Ambedkar for Appellant. None for the Respondents. CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & SANTOSH BORA, JJ. SANTOSH BORA, JJ. SANTOSH BORA, JJ. DATE: 24TH APRIL, 2008. DATE: 24TH APRIL, 2008. DATE: 24TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondents. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 73 days delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of 2 Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Place the Appeal on Board for admission in the month of August, 2008, subject to numbering. (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (SANTOSH BORA, J.) (SANTOSH BORA, J.) (SANTOSH BORA, J.)