WPMS No. 1607 of 2008 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, Advocate for the respondents. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties at some length, the Court finds that the plaintiff admits that he had sold the property to the defendants but the defendants are encroaching and utilizing upon that portion of the property which had not been sold off. Some of the disputed area is latrine and bathroom. In the light of the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of directing the parties to maintain the status quo on the spot till the disposal of the suit. In addition to the aforesaid, the disputed area, namely, the latrine and bathroom shall not be utilized by either of the parties, namely, the plaintiff and the defendants till the disposal of the suit. The area which is in the possession of the defendants other than the disputed area as stated above, can be utilized by the defendants by way of raising construction at their own risk and peril which would be subject to the result of the suit. The trial court is directed to decide the suit expeditiously preferably within a period of six months. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 13.12.2011 Shiv