1 itxal-988-06 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.988 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax-V, Pune ..Appellant. V/s. Late Shri Dilip N. Chohan ..Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta for appellant. None for respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C. :- 1. Matter not on board. Taken up for admission by the consent of learned counsel for the revenue. 2. In the present case, the Tribunal allowed the claim of the assessee by following its decision in the case of one of the co-owner Shri Narottam F. Chohan. There is nothing on record to show that the revenue has filed any appeal against the said order passed by the ITAT. Since the Tribunal in the case of the co-owner has attained finality, we see no reason to entertain the present appeal. Hence the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)