IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.10577 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 20.7.2009 Lachman Dass and others ...Petitioners VERSUS Sub Division Magistrate Dasuya and others …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.B.S.Bhinder, Advocate for the petitioner Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the relif claimed in the writ petition is only against respondent no.1 and no relief in the present writ petition is sought against respondents no.2 to 12. Hence they may be deleted from the array of respondents. Prayer is allowed. Notice of motion to sole respondent. Mr.PC Goyal, AAG, Punjab, who is present in Court has been asked to accept notice of motion on behalf of the sole respondent. In view of the short prayer made, this petition is disposed of at motion stage. The short prayer in the writ petition is for direction to now sole respondent to decide the election petition preferred by the petitioner in respect of challenging election of Sarpanch. It is specifically stated that the CWP No.10577 of 2009 :2: Election Tribunal on completion of pleadings/evidence has already heard arguments and the case was posted for orders on 2.4.2009 and thereafter adjourned from time to time. The short grievance is that the Tribunal has not pronounced the order on the election petition, despite completion of arguments. In view of the above circumstances, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.1 to decide the election petition in case the arguments have already been heard within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order by the competent authority. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 20.7.2009 MFK