IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 14412 of 2007 DATED:8.2.2008 Between: G Purna Chandra Rao petitioner And The Deputy Registrar of Coop Societies Office of the Divisional Coop Officer, Vijayawada, Krishna dist and 2 ors Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 14412 of 2007 Oral order: The present writ petition is filed questioning the orders passed in O.A No. 14 of 2006 dated 12.10.2006 by the A.P. Cooperative Appellate Tribunal, Vijayawada as illegal . The petitioner herein is Ex-President of the second respondent society. After conducting an enquiry into the affairs of the society, surcharge proceedings under section 60 (1) of the Act were conducted and surcharge proceedings dated 29.12.2005 were issued fixing the liability on the petitioner and another person viz., Mr K Koteswara Rao. Questioning the said orders, the petitioner filed O.A No. 14 of 2006 and Mr K Koteswara Rao filed O.A No.24 of 2006 on the file of the A.P. Cooperative Tribunal, Vijayawada. Since, both t h e O.As arise of surcharge proceedings dated 29.12.2005, the Cooperative Tribunal, passed a common order dated 12th October, 2006, setting aside the proceedings dt 29.12.2005 and remanded the matter to Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Society, Vijayawada. Questioning the said order, the petitioner filed the present writ petition on the ground that there is no need to remand the matter. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Co-operation. The Tribunal in its orders dated 12th October, 2006 in O.A. No. 14 and 24 of 2006 observed that the applicant in O.A No. 14 of 2006 was given opportunity to cross examine the inspection officer but the applicant in O.A No. 24 of 2006 was not afforded the opportunity to cross examine the witnesses and to adduce rebuttal evidence and that the first respondent failed to conduct independent and regular enquiry as contemplated under section 60 of the Act 7 of 1964 and remanded the matter. Admittedly, both Original Applications, arise out of a same order dated 29.12.2007 and since reasonable opportunity was not given to applicant in O.A No.24 of 2004, the Tribunal though it fit to remand both the applications to the original authority. By such remand of the matter, no prejudice or loss would be caused to the case of the petitioner herein, hence the order of the Tribunal needs no interference. For the foregoing reasons, I see no reason to interfere with the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated:8.2.2008. tvk THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 14412 of 2007 DATED:8.2.2008