IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2011 / 20TH ASWINA 1933 RP.No. 715 of 2011() ------------------------- WPC. NO.13110/2009 OG HONOURABLE HIGH COURT .... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER --------------------------------------------- A.K.AMINA,ANWAR MANZIL,P.O IRINGAL, (VIA) VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.VALSALAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOZHIKODE, CIVIL STATION, CALICUT - 673 101. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, QUILANDY TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, QUILANDY - 673 107. 4. THE SECRETARY MANIYOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH P.O MANIYOOR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 106. BY SRI.JAMES MATHEW KADAVAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= R.P. No. 715 of 2011 in W.P(C) No. 13110 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 12th day of October, 2011. O R D E R The petitioner in the writ petition has filed this review petition for review of the judgment dated 30.5.2011 in W.P(C) No. 13110/2009. The contention raised in the review petition is that on the date of passing the judgment, counsel for the petitioner could not appear and advance arguments. In view of the said contention, I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner on merits of the case. Even after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner on merits also, I do not find any grounds to change the judgment. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/