Civil Revision No.6730 of 2009(O & M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.13085-CII of 2010 in/and Civil Revision No.6730 of 2009(O & M) Date of Decision:18.05.2010 Abdul Hamid & Ors. .... petitioners Versus Himmat Rai .....respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Lokesh Sinhal,Advocate for the petitioners Mr.Adarsh Jain, Advocate for the respondent **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): This revision petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners-judgment debtors challenging the impugned orders dated 21.10.2009 and 19.11.2008. An application has been filed on behalf of the respondent- decree holder which is duly supported by an affidavit of Himat Rai, wherein, the decree-holder has taken a specific stand that in execution proceedings and pursuant to the warrants of possession, he has been delivered the possession of the suit property and present revision petition has become infructuous. Para No.8 of the aforesaid affidavit of the decree holder Civil Revision No.6730 of 2009(O & M) 2 reads as follows: “That as the decree in question has already been executed by the executing court, in pursuance of execution of warrants of possession and the execution petition has already been satisfied, the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous. It is necessary in the interest of justice that the above revision petition is ordered to be dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.” Keeping in view the aforesaid stand taken, this revision petition is disposed of with the observations that since the decree holder is satisfied with the execution of the decree, any other execution application, if pending , shall be consigned to the record room by the Executing Court. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 18.05.2010 neenu