THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.4749, 4750, 4751, 4752 & 4753 of 2011 Date : 31-3-2011 W.P.No.4749 of 2011 Between : V.Lakshmi Rajyam .. Petitioner And Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenali, Guntur District and another .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : -- Counsel for respondents : A.G.P. for Civil Supplies The Court made the following : COMMON ORDER: These Writ Petitions are filed assailing the orders of respondent No.1 suspending the authorizations of the petitioners’ fair price shops. Before filing these Writ Petitions, the petitioners filed appeals before the Joint Collector, Guntur. When this court asked the learned counsel as to how the Writ Petitions could be maintained when appeals have been already filed against the impugned orders, the learned counsel stated that Memos were filed for withdrawal of the appeals and that the appeals are accordingly withdrawn. As proof of such withdrawal has not been filed by the petitioners, the cases were passed- over in the forenoon. In the afternoon, when the cases are called, the learned counsel for the petitioners is not present. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies placed before the court Memo filed by one of the petitioners seeking withdrawal of the appeal. He has stated that no orders have been passed as yet allowing the petitioners’ memos. So long as the appeals filed by the petitioners are not withdrawn and orders of withdrawal have been passed, these Writ Petitions cannot be maintained. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are dismissed with liberty to the petitioners either to pursue the appeals or file fresh Writ Petitions after withdrawal of the appeals. _________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY.,J Date : 31-3-2011 AM