% C^^L^ Sins?a Bsnch' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITIOI^iNO. :?^^' /2006 UNDER_ARTLCLE 226.0F THE_CONSTrTUTIOJM OEINDIA ^' PETJTIQNEff*: J^ ,..^.- .^Ay/ ..^€/ ^i^ ;-:'^\-'' ^ ./y^''<; .^^/ <y ^- T.C.Patel, s/o Motichand, aged about 57 years, District Education Officer , Raigarh (under suspension), r/o Village Latesara, Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ^': VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1 ^ ^ State of Chhattisgarh , through Secretary, Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Under Secretary, Department of School Education, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) District Education Officer (In Charge), District Raigarh (C.G.) 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As stated above in the cause title. HIGH COHRT OF JUDICATURE CHHAmSQARH: BILASPUR 8in^e Bench: Hoa'Me SIu-t Satish K. Agaihotri, J. W.P.(eSt No, 5231 pf 2006 Petitioner : T. C. Patel Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh & others Shri Rainakant Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the respondents. 2006) The petitioner while working as Incharge District Education OfEicer, Ra^arh was suspended froin his service on fhe grouud of pendency of a ci-iianial case at Criiae No. 21/2004 for tfae offences under section 420, 467, 468 and 34 offhe Indian Penal Code. Leanied counsel for the petitioner subinits that during fhe suspension period the petitioner has not been paicl subsistence aUowance froin October, 2005. On perusal of the papers it is found fhat fhe Under Seci-etary, Govemnient of Chhattisgarh, School Education Department vide order dated 4.7.2006 (Aniiexure P/4) has directed fhe District Education OflBcer, Raigarh to niake payinent of the subsistence allowance iiainediately to the petitioner. Ifthe petitioner has any grievance that despite fhe order of the State Governiaent the District Education Officer, Raigarh bas not paid ajiy subsistence aBowaace. ! 3. The respondents/ authorities are accordingly directed to retease fhe subsistence allowance to the petitioner in accordaace with law, wifhin a period of 15 days froin the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. 4, With the above observations ttiis petition is disposed offinally. INMILI^- Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge Thzlate