1 caa752 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.752 OF 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.577 OF 2010 Ganesh Sunder Shetty & anr. ...Applicants vs. Vijaya Sharad Vichare & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.S.Shamim i/b M/s.Shamim & Co. for the applicants Ms Geeta Shastri for the respondent nos.1 and 2 CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : MARCH 29,2011 P.C.: 1 Herd learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the first and second respondents states that the appellants have violated the order of status quo passed by the trial Court and the respondents have filed a contempt proceedings. 2 The contempt proceedings will continue. However, prima facie case is made out to continue the ad-interim relief granted by this Court. The reason is that as of today, the first and second respondents are not able to substantiate their case that one Manjula A. Sanghavi was lawfully entitled to cover the area of 146 sq. ft. 3 Hence, civil application is disposed of by directing that, i) Order of status quo which was granted by way of ad- interim relief will continue to operate till the final disposal of the appeal. ii)It is made clear that pendency of the appeal will not operate as stay to the proceedings of the suit 2 caa752 and the trial Court will expeditiously proceed with the hearing of the suit. JUDGE