1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.960 OF 2011 Menaka Narsima Kokarne Petitioner versus The Commissioner of Police and another Respondents Ms.Veena Thadani for petitioner. Ms.S.Gaidhani, AGP for respondents. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 23rd June 2011 PC : 1. Learned advocate for the petitioner informs the Court that an appeal filed by the petitioner before the respondent no.2 impugning the order passed by the respondent no.1 dated 21st May 2011 is rejected and the respondent no.2 has directed the petitioner to file a fresh application before respondent no.1 seeking issuance of fresh license instead of seeking transfer of the license which stood in the name of her deceased mother. Learned advocate for the petitioner further informs the Court that an application seeking fresh license in the name of the petitioner is already filed before the respondent no.1 on 21st May 2011. She has also produced copies of applications dated 21st June 2011 addressed to the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Girgaon Division and the DCP, Hotel Branch, Crowford Market, Mumbai. Both the letters bear the acknowledgement of the respective offices of the ACP as well as DCP, Hotel Branch. 2. In view thereof, the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Hotel Branch is directed to consider the application dated 21st June 2011 of the 2 petitioner after hearing the petitioner and pass his order thereon on or before 4th July 2011. The petitioner shall be entitled to produce compilation of documents on which the petitioner seeks to rely at the time of the hearing of the said application. The DCP, Hotel Branch shall hear the petitioner on 27th June 2011 at 1.00 p.m.. 3. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed of. Needless to add that the petitioner shall be at liberty to impugn the order passed by the DCP, Hotel Branch, if the same is adverse to the petitioner. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)