IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.72 of 2011 VINDHYACHAL SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 03. 18.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that first information report lodged by the petitioner vide Simri P.S. Case No. 56 of 2010 for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 380 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code against the named accused persons who committed the serious offence as narrated in the Fardbeyan. The basic facts as narrated in the Fardbeyan is that petitioner being a Mukhia did not allow the illegal act of those accused persons. The accused persons in retaliation after lodging of the first information report are committing various illegal act such as demanding extortion money as also threatening the petitioner to be killed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite representing the matter before the several authorities in this regard, no tangible action has been taken. Considering the submissions made above, it is expedient in the interest of justice that Simri P.S. Case 2 No. 56 of 2010 as contained in Annexure- 1 lodged by the petitioner as also Dumrao Simri P.S. Case No. 59 of 2010 lodged by the brother of the petitioner needs to be investigated expeditiously without unnecessary delay and upon completion of the investigation police report be submitted forthwith. As regards the grievance of the petitioner with regard to danger to his life, it will be open for the petitioner to file fresh representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police with cogent information/materials which shall be looked into in accordance with law without delay. Accordingly, the writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)