^•—^.^, . ^^s^s:^s— ^^^.^^&^. |*^.,fc.u^3;2S!| ^ff^s^, j ^-^.^A^^^ J RMPIJR """'wv j BSFORB THE HON'BLS STATT3. ADMINISTRATIVS TRIBUNM. RAIPUR (M7F:") ©.A, 2000 i^l- -3 ^.ll^ Appellant B <.R. Banjare ^ aged 46 years, S/o Shri Chherkaram^ Designatlon - Surveyor (.U/3aspensicn) Soil cons. Offieer, Balodaba ^ar ^ Distt < .Rai pur . ¥B:RSTJS» Nqn-apalicants^: • 1. Sfate ^ovt.of Chhattlsgarh^ Through - The Secretary^ Agrlculture^ Soll Cons. Department^ Secretarlat Ra1pur . 2. Psroject Officer, Sxtensj.ve ^griculture Programfne^ Ra 1 pur e Appllcation U/s 19 of the Admlnlstrative l^ibunal Act 1985. •^' |C-22 3:rr^T^T r<ii<=h 3n§s/ ^+iich 'H® ^' ^-aE[~?S[Tq^iq, ^Tll^'li<o^ ^i^r '^r^ ^^ fe^T 3>Tr^T'^TT^R'Hf^H SB : Hoiil'ble 23.03.2010; Shri Somkant Verma, counsei-f4 ShnArvind Dubey, Panei Lawy^i With the consent of iearned cc| finaiiy. . Petitioner has approached this) reconded in his oonfidentiai report communjcated to him vide impugned c| A-1) received cn 28-03-2000. In the p| impugned oommunjcation regarding ac^ the annual confidentiaf report in respec} petitioner preferred a representation o] decided. !n the return fited by the respon submitted a representation dated 10-0^ respondent authorities as also approac| but no decision could be taken on th^ !n this view ofthe matter, interes authorities are direoted to) decide th adverse remark by a speaking order Accordingly, the respondent representatioh of the petitbner witSiin copy of the order. The pstitioner representation in contjnuation ofearlier With the aforesaid direction, the <=hl<4(d<lflvf ^l^l^riT ^ ^Q <Fsi^K i^'srf^TR'srr^r •rlvastava.J« the petitioner. for the State/respondents. unse! for the parties, the petition is heard Court, aggrieved by an adverse remark, >r the period ending 31st March, 1999 )mmunication dated 14-02-2000 (Arinexure stition, it has been stated that against the ^/ei'se remarks which has been recorded in ofthe period ending 31st March, 1999, the 10-04-2000, ttie same nas not yet been jents, it has been stated that the petitioner 1-2000 against adverse remarks before the icd the Tribuna! for expunging the remarks |id representation. |t ofjustice would be served, if respondent petitjoner's representation agalnst the feuthorities are djrected to decide the iree months from the date of recelpt of a 1/ould be at iiberty to submit a fresh |epresentation submitted by him. |)etition stands disposed of. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Jude [Tft^'^fe?:I