^' ij^ ^ o,a IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR (C.G.) PETITIONER: 4031 W.P.S No...... .LJ.U. ^..'..... .../2009 /rijay Kumar Choubey, Aged about 55 years, S/o Late Shri Jokhan Choubey, posted as Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Kansabel, Districf Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS T RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of General Administration, ^" _..."•*" X\<)~'^..-""" DKS Bhawan/ Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ...<y ^^v ^^yy^^K^^ .t^"~ ,;;^^^<;'^"" ^ rf?'"a^^" '^.:^? ^' 2. ' The Secretary Department of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Development, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Collector District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) 4. Project Officer, Integrated tribal development Project^ Jashpur Nagar^District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) 5. Shri R. B. Tiwari Posted as Chief Executive Officer ^- 1_ ^ Janpad Panchayat Nagri, District Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 PZ^THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARL^ND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- rc—78 // ^T^V^I f^F?- ?t^T?' ^TferT' 9h^i^ Hr* ll<»»W<*» ^^?- ^i<..,f^-^.;f ^•tri:w.j^,:"[^^-i^^ ^M€.L^).MZ1... '^^2^^ 3^71 .H^"(: '^fr^'SFlt^'-ST'?^i' Hon. Mr'. fe Pritinker.DiwaRer Shri Matin Siddiqul copnsel for the petitEoner Shri Yashwant Sjingh Thakur Dy. AG for the respondents/State. V^ith the consent of t| llnaiiy. Chailenge in thls p^ (Annexure P-1) by'?j vvho is worklng as Chief\ Kansabel, Dlstrict Jashpurj ^r<4?<^^ *ii<wff^ffe^<rf^^'R ^ ^tRm W^?T he counsei for the partles, the matter is Ijtjon Is to the order 30.6.2009 ^spondent No. 2 by vvhlch the petitioner Executlve Officer, Janpad Panchayat nas been transferred to the office of Commlssloner, Tr|)aS Welfare, Korba . Counse! for the petitioner submits that on 3.3.2009 the petitioner was transferred, from Lundra, Dlstrlct Sarguja to ths present piace of posting and now agaln wlth!n a period of four rnonths he has subjectsd to shiftlng. Counsel for the respondents/State submlts that iet the petitloner make a representation to the authorities concerned which wouEd be jn accordance wlth !aw. To tnls prcposltEon of the counsel, counsei for the petitioner showed hls aQreement. However, he for an interim protection tjli the /":-.-% "^w ^V.,BCS—78 .../ ^-^.^^N' T?^i' 3:rT^-'^3NT ^ ^2.- "s^ ^i<4;rn^/ ^Tii-H^i^ T^<^<^y Hl* l(l^P-W<B^ •-Rsp;@ •3^'ST 4^<^;/( ^ ^m^R^f^T y^T'' representation of the petit( concerned. Accordlngiy, the petitlcji the petltioner maRes a repr^sentat 'wsthin a perif)d of 10 ds.ys f{' order, the authoritles conc^i ....1:.--A..'...^ further period orthree weeks) . order. iwpugned shali be petltioner and he shaii not postlng. W<<?<n<ft3?^*Kri^^Tf^t<f^^K ^-3TfTO3r^I oner is decided by the auth.orlties n Is of with a dlrection that If sentation to the authorities concerned 'om the of receipt of copy of this rned decide the same wlthln a from the date of its recelpt.'TiiI then the [ jn abeyance so far as it reiates to the se from the present of Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge "^ ^ Wrf;;rrt:0^'"i%yws&£( ^i-^'^'-yfrw^' i