THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.4902 of 2010 Dated:04.03.2010 Between: Smt.Athe Devendra. …Petitioner and The District Collector, Adilabad, Adilabad District, And others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.4902 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed an application before the third respondent for necessary changes in the record of rights. She enclosed a registered sale deed being document No.2931 of 2009, dated 26.06.2009, in respect of land admeasuring Acs.2.20 cents in survey No.82/aa situated at Narsingapur Village of Mancheriyal Mandal in Adilabad District. The third respondent issued a notification calling for objections. The land was purchased from Gattaiah – respondent No.5. One Ramakka filed objection petition on 06.08.2009 stating that the gift deed she had executed in favour of respondent No.5 earlier has been cancelled by her under registered document No.4160 of 2006 dated 17.05.2006. Therefore, respondent No.3 advised the petitioner to approach the civil Court. The said memo dated 23.11.2009 is assailed in the Writ Petition. This Court heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Telangana Area). The petitioner claimed the right under sale deed executed by respondent No.5, who is none other than the son of respondent No.4. When respondent No.5 obtained title under a gift deed executed by respondent No.4, which was subsequently cancelled, it is certainly a question as to whether respondent No.5 without a valid title could have executed sale deed in favour of petitioner, which is the basis for seeking necessary changes in the record of rights. This appears to be the purport of the impugned order. Whether respondent No.3 could have effected necessary changes in spite of objection petition by respondent No.4 is certainly a matter for appeal under Section 5(5) of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971, or under Section 158(1) of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli. Such remedy by way of appeal is available. The petitioner has not availed the remedy and therefore, liberty is given to avail the remedy. Giving liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 04.03.2010 vs