IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1140 of 2009 1. Hare Ram Prasad, son of late Mungalal Yadav, resident of Village and P.O. Sunder Virajeet, District-Madhubani. 2. Girdhar Prasad Karn, son of late Mahabir Lal Das, resident of Village-Bhawanipur, P.O. Rahatta, District-Madhepura. 3. Ramroop Yadav, son of late Rasik Lal Yadav, resident of Village-Bishanpur, P.O. Aaran, District-Saharsa. 4. Rajendra Prasad, son of late Prabhulal Yadav, resident of Village-Chhapradhi, P.O. Kuardh, District-Madhubani. 5. Jai Nath Das, son of late Ram Sharan Kamat, Village and P.O. Kariho, P.S. and District-Supaul. 6. Birendra Prasad Singh, son of late Raghunandan Prasad Singh, resident of Village- Dhibripar, P.O. Pillichh, Via Parwalpur, District-Nalanda. 7. Rajendra Prasad Singh, son of late Somar Singh, Village-Bahadurpur, P.O. and P.S. Chandi, District-Nalanda. 8. Dwarika Prasad Singh, son of Bishundhari Prasad Singh, Village-Bishunpur, P.O.Aant, District-Nalanda. 9. Arun Kumar Singh, son of Keshri Ramavtar Singh, Village- and P.O. Bharauli, District-Saharsa. 10. Sheonath Raut, son of Moti Raut, resident of Village- and P.O. Murliganj, Ward No.4, District-Madhepura. 11. Kamlesh Kumar, son of Munshi Sinha, resident of Village- and P.O. Kachaharia, Via-Bhathar, District-Nalanda. 12. Deep Narain Mahto, son of late Sahdeo Mahto, Village and P.O. Madhepura, District-Madhepura ------Petitioners --- Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna, Shri G.S. Pillai. 2. The Principal Secretary-cum- Commissioner, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, Shri Bhanu Pratap Sharma 3. The Director in Chief Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna Shri Shatruhan Prasad --- Respondent --- Opposite Parties. --------- 2 2. 23.4.2010 None appears on behalf of the petitioners. Heard Mrs. Nilu Agrawal, learned Government Advocate 10. This application under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred by the appellants of L.P.A. No. 946 of 2003, for the alleged disobedience of the order dated 26.6.2006, whereby a direction was issued to the respondent authorities to consider the cases of the appellants for regularization in service in accordance with the direction of the Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and others Vs. Uma Devi and others, reported in 2006(2) PLJR(SC)363,and the follow-up decisions of this Court. The contemners have placed on record their show-cause wherein it is stated that, in view of the observations of this Court, the committee has already submitted its report and action is being taken accordingly. It is further stated that the present petitioners did no qualify for regularization. It thus appears that 3 the order of this Court has been complied with and there is no need to pursue this matter any further. It is accordingly dismissed. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar ,J. ) (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)