BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Monday, the Twenty First day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15011 of 2011 G.VINOTH :PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.4 -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, LAND GRABBING SPECIAL CELL, C.C.B. POLICE STATION, TRICHY IN CR.NO. 27 OF 2011 :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 365, 323, 294 (b), 506(ii), 307, 427 of IPC read with Section 3 of PPDL Act in Crime No.27 of 2011,on the file of the respondent police. He has approached this court for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2.Heard Mr.T.Senthilkumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.C.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he did not commit any crime as stated in the complaint. He would submit that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would also submit that he is also having permanent residence and therefore, he would request for the grant of anticipatory bail. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the petitioner damaged the Thiruvalluvar Statue, worth about Rs.25/- lakhs. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and if for any reason, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, suitable conditions may be passed for the secured presence of the petitioner. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to all the petitioner, of course, subject to certain stringent conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the judicial Magistrate concerned on executing separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No:V, Trichy, and on further condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.25/- lakhs to the credit in Crime No.27 of 2011 on the file of the court of learned Judicial Magistrate No:V, Trichy and the learned Magistrate is directed to keep the same as court deposit and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. 7.The petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 21/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO:1.The Judicial Magistrate No:V, Trichy. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Trichy. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Land Grabbing Special Cell, CCB Police Station, Trichy. +1. CC to M/S. T.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate SR.No.40621. RP/21.11.2011/1P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15011 of 2011,Date:21/11/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/