IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 19742 OF 2007 Between: Smt. Mary Anupama & another. … Petitioners and Greater Visakhapatnam Muncipal Corporation, Rep. By its Commissioner, Visakhapatnam … Respondent THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 19742 OF 2007 ORAL ORDER: The petitioners are developing their land by putting up a multi-storied building jointly in the plots owned by them. In the process they have obtained the sanctioned plan. But, however, a notice dated 5.9.2007 was served on the 1st petitioner on 14.9.2007 to show cause as to why action should not be taken for demolition with reference to the deviated structures, especially the balcony portions. 2. The grievance of the petitioners is that no notice was served on the 2nd petitioner, and further sufficient time was not granted even to the 1st petitioner to submit her explanation. Therefore, the Petitioners have come up with the present writ petition. 3. After hearing both sides and considering the rival contentions, without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Respondent-Corporation to serve a notice on the 2nd petitioner also and give a week’s time to both the petitioners for filing their explanation from the date of service of notice on the 2nd petitioner, and after considering their explanation, the Respondent is at liberty to pass appropriate orders and take appropriate action in accordance with law. 4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _________________ S. Ananda Reddy, J. Dt. 17..09..2007 Note: Issue operative Portion by wire at party’s costs. (bo) Kvh THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 19742 OF 2007 ORAL ORDER Dt. 17..09..2007