IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30169 of 2011 Bablu Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 21.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 16.05.2011 in a case registered under Section 392 of the I.P.C. It would appear from the impugned order that the name of this petitioner came in this case in the confessional statement of co-accused Manoj Kumar and furthermore, in course of investigation some witnesses claimed to have identified the petitioner vide paragraph Nos. 131, 132 and 133 of the case diary. It would further appear from the impugned order that petitioner carries criminal antecedent of five cases. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has already been released on bail almost all the cases which have been registered against the petitioner. It is further contended by him that except confessional statement of co-accused, there is no cogent evidence against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Bablu Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Sadar (Mufassil) Case No. 343 of 2009. Kamlesh (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)