HI6H COURT OP CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASHJR M.A, No.561 of 2005 ADpellant Royendra Kumar Dewangan S/o. Hc^nipam bewan9an, aged <d>out 34 years. Occupation-Tailor, R/(i.Villa9& Kaudikosa, Disrr'ict-Rajnandgdon (C.S.) Versus Respondents 1. Sirdhari lal Sahu. S/o. Prem Lal Sahu, aQed about 25 years, ftesident of^ Villcge Kaudikasc, P.S.Ambogarh 3i Chowki, District-RcijnandgaBn (C^.), 2. The Oriental Insurance Cqnnpflny, Through Braneh Man<ger Branch • Kamthi Line, Oistrict Rcynandy>on ; (APPEAL UN&ER SECTEON 173 OF THE WOTOR WHICLE ACT,1988) (SB: 1-lorAte Ahr. T.P. Shanno. J.) None present for the appeltouit when the case is catted oyt for hearin9. Shri Shailendra Sharma. counsel for respondent No.2. ORAL ORDER ^assed on 19th June. 200^ I howe perused I.A.No.1311/2005, applieation under a-der 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure and I.A.hto4310/2005, (^plicatiwi for exemption from filing of the receipt of deposit. By the award dated 18.2.2005, learned First Additiona! Accident Claims Tribunal, Rcijnandgaon hos fastened the liability of poymenf of compensction of Rs.lO^XXV- to pespondent No.l by the appticant-in Clairo Cose hto.131/2003. Jhe appellcsnt was required to comply with the^ moindarrory provisions of Section 173 of the Motor Vehksle Act for fi|ing^ the appeal and was rsquired to deposit ths amount of 50% of the poyment of compensation or Ks.25.000/- whichewr tess. but th®appellantteB not -2-- deposited <my mnount from 2005 till today, therefore, I.A.No.l3tO/20Q5 is dismissed summarily and in consequencs the apped is abo dismissed; No order as to cost. I.A.No.1311/2005 is clso dismissed summarily. Sd/-,,,,r T.P.Sharma Judge