IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10740 of 2007 RAJA RAM MAHATO, S/O LATE RAM GULAM MAHTO, R/O MOHALLA-DHAB, P.S.- ROSERA, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. …………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY THROUGH ITS VICE-CHANCELLOR, KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA. 2. THE REGISTRAR, L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, UDAYANACHARYA ROSERA COLLEGE, ROSERA, SAMASTIPUR. ………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 17.09.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by an order of this Court as contained in Anneuxre-1. He submits that the said order may be made applicable in the case of petitioner also and the directions issued to the Principal of the concerned college in that order should be made applicable for petitioner also. Learned counsel for the respondent University does not dispute this submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. Therefore, this writ application is disposed of and it is made clear that the directions issued to the respondent Principal by the orders of this Court, as contained in Annexure-1, shall be treated as issued in the - 2 - case of petitioner also and to be complied with within the time fixed in Annexure-1. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)