IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.6291 of 2007 Date of decision: 2.3.2009 Gurdial Singh and others ......Petitioners Versus Punjab State Leather Development Corporation Ltd. ......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sunil Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Amit Rawal, Advocate for the respondent. * * * Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that during the pendency of this revision petition, the main suit between the parties has been decided by the trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 19.12.2007 and therefore, the present revision petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further stated that vide order dated 6.12.2007 passed in this revision petition, this Court had directed the Lower Appellate Court not to pass any order on the appeal filed by the petitioners against the order dated 2.5.2005 passed by the trial Court on application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC which has also become infructuous. Since this Court had passed order dated 6.12.2007 directing the Lower Appellate Court not to pass the final order, the same could not be disposed of by the Lower Appellate Court. It is made clear that since the main suit has been decided and CR No.6291 of 2007 -2- order dated 6.12.2007 is specifically vacated, the Lower Appellate Court may decide the aforesaid appeal in accordance with law. The revision petition is ordered to be dismissed as infructuous. March 2, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE