IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) NO.1187 OF 2011 ABHIMANYU THAKUR SON OF LATE JAGDISH THAKUR, R/O VILLAGE- MURALA, P.S.- RAMGADHAWA, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN VERSUS 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. AWADHESH THAKUR SON OF LATE RAMASHRAY THAKUR 3. PRADEEP KUMAR THAKUR SON OF LATE RAMASHRAY THAKUR 4. SACHITA NAND THAKUR, SON OF LATE RAMASHRAY THAKUR 5. SUBODH KUMAR THAKUR SON OF 6. RAVI SHANKAR THAKUR SON OF ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MURALA, P.S.- RAMGADHAWA, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN ---------------------------------- 2 16/12/2011 The present appeal has been filed against the judgment of acquittal dated 20.8.2011 passed in Sessions Trial No. 517 of 2004 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. IV, Motihari though the charges was framed under section 302 IPC also. The specific case of the informant is that his son received injuries by falling on the spade. The evidence of PW 6 the I. O. suggests that the appellant put his signature on the fard-beyan after understanding the same and in subsequent statement under section 161 Cr.P.C. also supported the case as narrated in the fard-beyab. Subsequently by way of protest the narration in the fard-beyan was deserted by the informant. We find that PW 5 the doctor also not supported the subsequent version as claimed by the 2 informant. We do not find any perversity in appraisal of the evidence. This appeal is without merit. It is accordingly, dismissed. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) avin