BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.8788 of 2011 MARI @ MARIYAYI, ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED 1 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, SIVAGANGAI DT. IN CR.NO. 15/2011. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M. MURALI Advocate For Respondent : MR. T. MOHAN, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Section 420 I.P.C. in Crime No.15 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been arrayed as A1 and she has been implicated on the allegation of inducing the de-facto complainant, who is none else than the sister-in-law of the petitioner to pledge the jewels for obtaining loan and after receiving the jewels, she has not pledge the same. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the matter was earlier referred for Mediation, but the same was not materialised. 3. Mr.T.Mohan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner has involved in similar two other cases. 4. The fact remains that this is a case of dispute between the petitioner and her own sister-in-law, who is the de-facto complainant in this case and the petitioner has been implicated on the allegation https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ as stated above. Though it is stated that the petitioner has been involved in similar two other cases, the fact remains that the petitioner has not suffered any previous conviction. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of her arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ilaiyankudi, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Judicial Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 21/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICAL MAGISTRATE ILAIYANKUDI 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SIVAGANGAI 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, SIVAGANGAI DT. 1. CC to M/S. M. MURALI Advocate SR.No.45271: DM::2011:DECEMBER:23:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.8788 of 2011 Date :21/12/2011 2P:6C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/