/ 1 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1498 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.818 OF 2006 Rohini Chandrakant Chitnis & Anr. ...Applicants V/s. Pandurang Shivram Sapat since deceased through his legal heirs & representatives: 1-a. Yashwant Pandurang Sapat & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Vaibhav Patankar for Applicants. Mr.Y.K. Deshpande for Respondent No.1-a. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : 20th SEPTEMBER, 2007. P.C:- 1. Learned counsel for the Respondents No.1-a submits that his client is present. He makes statement that the decree will not be executed by the Respondents. In view of the statement, at this stage interim relief is not granted in terms of prayer clause(a) of the Civil Application. However, liberty is granted to the Applicants to renew this request if any attempt is made by the Respondents to execute the decree. . Application is disposed of accordingly. V.M. KANADE, J.