THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.817 of 2004 ORDER: The petitioner claims to be working as Watchman-cum- Sweeper in the 5th respondent institution, which is admitted to grant-in- aid. Her grievance is that though she is working for the past more than two decades, the respondents have not absorbed her against an aided vacancy. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner seeks absorption against an aided vacancy in the 5th respondent institution. Even assuming that the petitioner has made out a case for it, the fact remains that a ban imposed by the Government on appointment, or filling up of aided vacancies in private aided educational institutions, is operating. The matter is now pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Unless the ban is either lifted by the Government, or set aside by a Court of law, there is no possibility for the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to renew her efforts, as and when the ban is either lifted, or set aside. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.21.10.2010. GJ