Ltai ^" IN TWV uTnu miTBT nf TTTnTr-iTTTpiT AT RTT ASPTTO j.-^ ±i±i^i.l.±<^±±^-^^A^i v^A.'- <J ^ i^AV--^-a. A ^Aik.i^ ra. i i^i.j-^r^.^i. ^JL^ wwffi^vs PETmONERS WRIT PETITION N0. 1 c~a -^^ ^y 1^.?: .\1'&' .^s^ .-•.^ti^' ^•\'»- ^^. r'''-^- ^' 4. p '2004 9 Lakhan Sahu, a.sedabout55 vears, S/o Samelal, Phool Singh, aged 70 vsars, S'o Rupai Sahu, B.amlal, aasd about 65 vears, Si'o Rupai, Ramprasad, agsd about 60 years- S/o Rupai Saha, All the R/o Dashrangpur-Khurd, P.H.No. 11, R.LCifcie Bodla, Tahsii Kawardha, DistrictKabirdfaam (C.G.) -VERSUS- RESPONDENTS \\asPtt< C\8" t0 ^' S-- 9~- s^ y-^ '?-• 8.. $- 1. ^ 2. ^.3. ^- 4. -75. 9 6. ^ '• Jfaaduram, S/o B.ama Gond, Dukhiva Bai. Vvife ofRama Gond, Pivariva, S/o Rama Gocd, Son Singh, S/o Rama Gond, Anashiva, S/o Rama Gond, Urmiia Bai, S/o Rama Gond, Mangli Bai, S/o Rama Gond, ft ^ All R/o Village Dashrangpur, Tahsi] Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) Board ofRevenue throueh its Prssident, Circuit Court, Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Kabirdham (C.G.) Sub-Div.isionai Officer. 9. 10. Kabirdham (C.G.) •^,.. WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FORISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT. ORDERS OR DIRECTION. / XI-HC-78 *ll*trtl ^IT^ vj'c.q '-CfWMil,UT:l\WIS, RciN-fy'! ,.^^:.^.2^/. 3IT^9T CR^ (^tgsR?) ^ an^STtpT R'licb tTaiT3iI^?[ri'Hi<b ii;gtE^gIS28sBB il^s3^1^-s^'^^ B .\h Barve 23-S.200B Shri !ndrasen Sahu. cour.se, ShriR.N.-Jha, counsef for r< Shri Sandeep Dubey, O.A. He< Learned counsei for the pe has been fiied against the order Rsvsnue in revision whersby prays Learned counsel for fhe praysr Is tnat since stay has been| to decide the re'/ision at the ea< titioners submits that the instant petition c|ated 12-1-2004 passed by the Board of ^r for stay has bean rejected. tsetiiioners further submits that iimitec! rejected, Board of Revenue be directed liest, to v.'hich learned counsei tor the respondents have no objectlon. Having heard leamed cour|se! facts and circumstances of the ca| by iearnsd counse! for macie oy reasonabie, Board of Revenue fc|< directed to decide the revision at ttt< With the dlrection aroresaia'l Consequently, M.(W.$P.I)( 7176/2005 aiso s+and disposed of| Partles are entitisd for certiffed copy ofthls order. <pt<if»<I1i<i!*i«T^'fetQ•(Rf't^i'i ^3lRl*<31T^ST for the potitioners. jspondents Mo.1 to 7. )3r the State.'respQndents No.8 and 10. for the parties, having regard to the ^s, and also having regard to the prayer Ihe Detitionsrs which is iust, fair and efore whoni the revision is pending is e eariiesi, but not later than 5 months. the petltion stands dlsposed of. io.241/2004, i.A.Nos.671/2004 and Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge