IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.655 of 2007 (i) Dr. Rajesh Kumar, (ii) Amit Anand, (iii) Mahesh Kumar all s/o deceased-Sita Ram Das, resident of Flat No. L.I.G. 65, Housing Colony Kankarbagh, P.S. Kankarbagh Town and, District of Patna… ……Petitioners Versus 1. Bihar State Housing Board through its Managing Director, Hardinge Road, Patna, 2. Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board, Hardinge Road, Patna, 3. Revenue Officer, Bihar State Housing Board, Hardinge Road, Patna, 4. Estate Officer, Bihar State Housing Board, Hardinge Road, Patna…. …..Respondents ……………. For the Petitioners : Mr. A. N. Banerjee, Mr. Amresh, Advocates For Respondents : Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate ……………………… 6 09.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondents. Petitioners seek quashing of Annexure-1 whereby a demand of Rs.2,19,965/- has been made by the Housing Board in connection with price of the flat no.100/65. It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that by Annexure-8, which is a letter dated 9.12.1994 written by the Revenue Officer and addressed to the 2 Executive Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna, it has been stated that the deceased original petitioner Sita Ram Das had paid an amount of Rs.40,127/-. However, another demand has been raised by the Housing Board which is not justified. Learned counsel appearing for the Bihar State Housing Board submitted that, in view of the fact that there is a dispute with regard to the price of the concerned flat and a Price Committee has been constituted for resolution of such dispute in the light of the order passed by this Court, the petitioners may approach the price committee. In above view of the matter, this application is being disposed of with a liberty granted to the petitioners to file an application stating all the grievance which have been raised in this writ application before respondent no.2, i.e, Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna along with a certified copy of this order within eight weeks. In such case, it is expected that respondent no.2 would immediately forward the matter to the Price Committee which would decide the matter within 3 eight weeks thereafter. It is made clear that the Price Committee should accord opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and dispose of the matter by recording a reasoned order. Sanjay-II ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)