IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.W.P. No.5949 of 2010 Decided on: 28th September, 2010 Anil Kumar Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge For the Petitioner: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K.Vema, Dy. A.G. __________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers :- “(i) That the inaction on the part of the respondents No. 1 & 2 may kindly be held as illegal, ultra vires and non-sustainable in the eyes of law. (ii) That the writ of mandamus may kindly be issued to the respondents to promote the petitioner against t host of driver w.e.f. 31.8.2005 with all consequential benefits with 12% per annum. (iii) That the respondent No. 2 may kindly be directed to decide the representation, Annexures P-7 and P-9 while passing speaking order.” 2. There will be a direction to the second respondent to look into Annexures P-7 and P-9 and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law, adverting to the submissions made by the petitioner, within a month from the date of production of the copy of this judgment alongwith the copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice ( Justice Kuldip Singh ), September 28, 2010(K) Judge