IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.4436 of 2009 MD.JAHIR s/o Late Mohammad Yusuf, Resident of Mohalla- Raj Kumar Ganj, P.S. Nagar, District-Darbhanga ...Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …Opposite Party ----------- 2/ 11.08.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 9.1.2009 passed in Cr. Revision No.509 of 2008 by the Sessions Judge, Darbhanga, as well as the order dated 9.9.2008 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Darbhanga, in T.R. No.1512 of 2008/C.R. No.1422 of 2003. From the records of the case, it appears that the petitioner is aggrieved for the reasons that the trial court has allowed examination of witnesses on payment of cost of Rs.200/- for each witness. However, I find that the complaint was filed sometime before November, 2003, and the evidence on solemn affirmation of the complainant was taken on 18.11.2003 and thereafter when he failed to appear on numerous dates four year later the prosecution case was closed by order dated 9.10.2007 and the case was fixed for charge on 6.11.2007. In the meanwhile, the complainant had been given numerous opportunities to examine the witnesses on payment of Rs. 200/-, but he failed to do so and instead six months later filed an application praying that the cost of Rs.200/- be reduced. Also the order dated 9.10.2007 was also permitted to be recalled by order dated 18.2.2008 with cost of Rs.200/- per witness. - 2 - From the records of the case, it is evident that the complainant has filed this case without any responsibility and, therefore, should not be given any further opportunity to waste the time of the court. The application stands dismissed. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)