WP(C) 342/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Mr. M.U. Mondol, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. BK Sharma, l earned counsel, for the respondents No.1 to 6. None has appeared on behalf of th e remaining respondents. The grievances of the petitioners are, in brief, thus: The petitioners w ere applicants for the post of Anganwadi Workers/Anganwadi Helpers under Bilasip ara ICDS Project, Lakhiganj. On 23.12.2009, a select list was prepared by the re spondent Nos.6 and 7, which is, according to the petitioners, without quorum and in violation of the relevant Govt. Notifications. As the dispute, raised by the petitioners, are substantially factual in nature, this Court is of the view that in the facts and circumstances of the pre sent case, respondent No.2, namely, Director of Social Welfare, Government of As sam, shall look into the grievances of the petitioners and make enquiry in this regard and, in accordance with the findings of the inquiry, pass appropriate ord er(s). Whatever decision is reached, in this regard, by the respondent No.2 or w hatever order is, ultimately, passed by the respondent No.2, on the petitioners’ grievances, shall be communicated, in writing, to the petitioner and if the pet itioners feel aggrieved by the decision(s), which may be reached, or the order(s ), which may be passed by the respondent No.2, the petitioners shall remain at l iberty to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. The whole exercise, so directed, shall be completed within a period of t wo months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by the respondent No. 2. The petitioner may furnish to the respondent No.2 a certified copy of this or der along with a copy of the writ petition and annexures thereto. Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel for the respondents.