... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5553 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.5553 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.5553 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5552 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.5552 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.5552 OF 2005 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Mrs S.D.Shinde, A.P.P. for the Applicant. Shri S.M.Oak for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 01, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 01, 2006. : SEPTEMBER 01, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned A.P.P. for the State and the Advocate appearing for the Respondent. Perused the Application. Application is strongly opposed by the Advocate for the Respondent. The Applicant has filed additional affidavit of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, High Court, Mumbai. In view of assertions in the said affidavit, sufficient cause is made out. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE