IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2011 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 9093 of 2011(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SURENDRAN T.J., DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT) TALUK OFFICE, THODUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF KERALA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR LAND REVENUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695033. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 9093 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 23rd day of March, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Junior Superintendent in the Revenue Department of the Government of Kerala. He has filed this writ petition seeking the following relief: “Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to consider Ext. P8 representation of the petitioner before finalizing Ext. P4(a), P6(a) and P7(a) provisional seniority lists.” Admittedly, Ext. P4(a), P6(a) and P7(a) are provisional seniority lists. Admittedly the petitioner has filed Ext. P8 representation against the provisional seniority list also. I have no reason to conclude that the respondents would not consider Ext. P8 representation while finalising the provisional seniority list. Therefore, there is no reason for any apprehension of the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.