,' HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WntPetit!on(S)No. 4094 of2908 (, PETITIONER : Parmatma Singh aged about 45 years, son of Shri Ramjatan Singh, Resident of Primary School, North Jhagraldiand, District Korea (CG). YIBSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretaty, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The District Education Officer, Korea, District Korea 3. Administrator/Principal I.E.M. School, Jhagrakhand, District Korea (CG). 4. The Director, Directorate, Public Institution, Pension Bada, Raipur (CG). (WKH PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hxm'bleMr.SatishK.AsmhotrtJ.) Present : Shri R.K. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL_0_RDER (Passed on 29 day ofJuiy, 2008) 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. The petitioner clainis to be an Assistant Teacher, working in I.E.M. School, Jhagrakhand, District Korea (CG), mn aiid managed by the respondent No. 3. TS-ie petitioner vvithout giving details as to what is the nature of the School, vvhy the teachers are at par with other teachers, has filed fhis petition, praying that the respondents be directed to grant benefits of5 Pay Commission w.e.f. 01.01.1996. 3. Be that as it may, it is difficult to decide the issue involved for want of adequate materials with regard to grant of 5 Pay Commission to the employees. -^^.,. Sahu This Court has already considered and decided the same issue on 06.02.2007 in the matter ofA. Lall (Smt.) Vs. State ofChhattisgarh and Others1 (W.P. No. 4108 of2005) and other connected matters. 5. It is not necessaiy to approach this Court directly when the law on a pailicular issue has already been settled. The petitioner may make a representation to the concerned authorities, if so advised, in the light of 3aw settled by this Court in the matter of A. Lall (Smt) Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Ofhers (Supra). 6. This petition is accordingly disposed of with the above stated libeTty. 'No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ' 2007 (1) BLJ 265