IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4672 of 2002 SUCHINDRA KUMAR YADAV S/o Shri Jitan Rai, resident of village- Auraiya, P.S. Dhaka, District East Champaran. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur 3. The Collector, East Champaran at Motihari 4. The Motor Vehicle Inspector, District Transport officer, Motihari ( East Champaran). 5. Anil Kumar Yadav S/o Shri ram Davan Prasad Yadav, resident of village - Amar Chatuni, Distt. East Champaran 6. Ajay Kumar S/o Shri satya deo Rai, resident of village and P.S. Bariarpur, Distt. East Champaran... Respondents. ----------- Advocate for the petitioner :- Mr. Murari Narain Chaudhary Advocate for the State :- Mr. Arup Kr. Chongdar 12 10-12-2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has challenged the order of District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari contained in memo no. 247 dated 22-10- 2001 ( annexure-3) . By that order altogether 19 persons were appointed on the post of driver in the district of East Champaran. By a supplementary affidavit a judgment and order of this court dated 23- 3-2006 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 15257 of 2001 ( Manoj kumar and others Vrs. The State of Bihar and others) and two other analogous cases has been brought on record as annexure-6 to show that the appointment of 19 drivers by the impugned order has been quashed by this court after giving a finding that the selection process was not fair and objective. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the aforesaid - 2 - Naresh judgment and order dated 23-3-2006 was challenged through L.P.A. 265 of 2006 which was disposed of with certain direction and pursuant to that fresh selection was made leading to new appointments. From the aforesaid facts it is clear that the impugned order contained in annexure-3 has already been quashed by a Bench of this court far back in the year 2006. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Shiva Kirti Singh,J)