..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1593 OF 2008 M/s.J.J.Buildon Pvt. Ltd., ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra and others. ..Respondents. .... Mr.S.P.Kanuga, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.Tushar Garodia, Adv. for the respondent Nos.2 to 8. Ms.A.A.Mane, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 21st November, 2008. DATED : 21st November, 2008. DATED : 21st November, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard both sides. 2. The petitioner has preferred an application for return of the property i.e. 1252 pieces of fabric (thance) seized in C.R. No.99 of 2006 of E.O.W. Unit-II, Mumbai. The said application came to be allowed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate by order dated 21.4.2008. However, the goods were returned on condition that the petitioner execute bond of Rs.40,00,000/-. It is seen that the application had been preferred by the original complainant for return of property and in the said ..(2).. application the value of the goods i.e. 1252 pieces of fabric is stated as Rs.14,00,000/-. The petitioner is not the complainant. When the original complainant has stated that the value of the property is Rs.14,00,000/-, calling upon the petitioner to execute bond of Rs.40,00,000/- would be too harsh. Hence, the amount of bond is reduced from Rs.40,00,000/- to Rs.14,00,000/-. 3. Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)