IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.V.K.BALI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN MONDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2007 / 2ND MAGHA 1928 RP.No. 15 of 2007() ------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.2024/2004 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IN W.A. ------------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADVOCATE GENERAL MR.C.P.SUDHAKARA PRASAD & SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.SUNIL RESPONDENTS: APPELLANT & ADDL.RESPONDENTS IN W.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.MOHAMMED ABDUL RAHIMAN, MANAGER, VIVEKODAYAM A.L.P.SCHOOL, KARAKUTHANGADI (P.O.) MUTHUTHALA, PATTAMBI- 679 303. 2. KALIKUTYY, KORAKKOTTIL HOUSE, KARAKUTHANGADI, MUTHUTHALA P.O., PALAKKAD DT. 3. C.K.MOIDU, CHERUMKUZHIYIL, KARAKKUTH ANGADI, POST MUTHUTHALA, PATTAMBI, PIN -679 314. BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.K. BALI, C.J. & P.R.RAMAN, J. ------------------------------- C.M.Appln.No.7 of 2007 & R.P.No.15 of 2007 in W.A.No.2024 of 2004 ------------------------------- Dated, this the 22nd day of January, 2007 ORDER V.K.Bali,C.J.(Oral) Delay condoned. 2. The order sought to be reviewed reads thus: “Learned counsel for the parties agree that this matter has to be disposed of in terms of the judgment in a similar Writ Appeal bearing No.545 of 2004 decided on 1st March, 2006 setting aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge. We thus issue the same directions in this case as were issued in W.A.No.545 of 2004.” 3. The learned Advocate General states that the Government is to seek review of the orders earlier passed. We may only mention that the writ appeal was disposed of in terms of the judgment in a similar writ appeal bearing No.545 of 2004. The same directions were issued in this case as were issued in W.A.No.545 of 2004. If the Government may successfully seek review of the said order, then only the present review application would be competent. Dismissed with liberty to move a fresh R.P.No.15/2007 2 application if the Government successfully gets reviewed the order in W.A.No.545 of 2004. V.K. BALI, CHIEF JUSTICE. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE. vns