IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2008 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 17771 of 2008(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------------- NAGEESHA, S/O. PONNAMMA, RESIDING NEAR GPM COLLEGE, HOSBETTU VILLAGE, MANJESWAR, KASARAGOD DT. BY ADV. SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH SMT.V.SETHUKUTTY AMMA RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASARAGOD. 2. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KASARAGOD. 3. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. BY GP.SRI.I.V. PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No. 17771 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 13th day of June, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner's mother was assigned an extent of one acre of land comprised in resurvey R.S.No.105/1 of Hosabettu Village as per proceedings of the erstwhile district Collector of Kannur, dated 5.2.1979. The same was sought to be cancelled and the petitioner undertook a protracted litigation. Ultimately her right was stated to be accepted by the Government. In spite of the same the possession and title of the petitioner's mother has not been regularised is the grievance of the petitioner. Since petitioner's mother is bed ridden the petitioner has come up with this writ petition. The petitioner submitted Ext.P10 representation before the 1st respondent detailing their grievances. Petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Ext.P10. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P10 after affording an W.P.(C).No. 17771 OF 2008 2 opportunity of being heard to the petitioner or her representative, as expeditiously as possible at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If necessary the 1st respondent shall review his earlier order in tune with the subsequent orders passed by the Government in the matter. The petitioner shall forward a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition to the 1st respondent for compliance. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE bkn/-