^^gS^s'sS^'ig^^- 1. ^' p' \^/^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF TUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.NO. ^1^& OF 2005 ^ WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITITUION OF INDIA PETITIQNER A^ ^..-•"y1r^..^ ^< A ^•"' -^E.. ^^0" RESPONDENTS y x ^ Vinod Chandravanshi, S/o. Shri Shiv Kumar Chandravanshi aged about 25 years, Member-Janpad Panchayat, Kawardha, R/o. Village Indori, Tahsil Kawardha District Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS Gram Panchayat Indori, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.). Shri Sitaram Sahu, S/o. Shri Dukhuram Sahu, aged about 35 years, Sarpanch- Gram Panchayat Indori, R/o. Village Indori, Tahsil Kawardha and District Kabirdham (C.G.). Kashi Ram Sahu, S/o. Shri Chaituram Sahu, aged about 38 years, R/o. Village Indori, Tahsil Kawardha and District Kabirdham (C.G.). Collector District Kabirdham (C.G.). WRIT 5y Dy.Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.). /\ ^ PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE_QFAPPROPRIATE WRIT / WRITS, ORDER / ORDERS DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS ETC. F-"r ' -^ ] HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. 2708 of 2005 Petitioner Viuod Chandravanshi Versus Respoiiflents Grani Panchayat Indori aad otliers BB: Honlale Mr. Jiistice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Shri M, K. Sitilia, Advocate for tlie petitioner. None for fhe respondents No. 1, 2 and 3. Snit. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt, Advocate for the respondeiits No. 4 & 5. Thalair ORDER ( 20th September,200G) The follo^Tiag order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agaihotri, J. 1. Leanied counsel appearing for flie pedtioner, siibmits fhat the petitioner has filecl I.A,No. 9462/2006, appUcation for withdrawal of the petition. I^eanied coiinsel appearing for the State/ responclents has iio objection. 2. In view of the above, tlie applicatioii is allowed and the petition is disiiiissed as withdrawn. SatishK.Agnihotri Judge