1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.174 OF 2010 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.498 OF 1998 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr.S.V.Jadhav Patil, learned counsel for petitioner. (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 06/05/2010 Heard. According to learned counsel for petitioner, there is dis-obedience of the order passed in CRA No.498/98 dated 17-06-1998. This order came to be passed on the rejection of Misc.Civil. Appeal by the 4th Additional District Judge, Aurangabad. After going through the entire order, it is observed by this Court that the respondent Corporation shall take utmost care to not to cause any damage to the house of the plaintiff, even in a slightest manner. If any damage or loss is caused to the petitioner/plaintiff, the Corporation shall see that he is appropriately and proportionately compensated for the same. 2 Thus the fact is clear that while disposing the civil revision application, no orders were issued against the respondent in the said revision application. If no directions are given, then there can not be any dis-obedience of the order of this Court. The contempt petition sans any merit, hence rejected. The petitioner is not precluded to pursue his remedy in the Civil Court as already the civil suit was filed by the petitioner bearing RCS No.314/1995 before the 8th Civil Judge, J.D. Aurangabad. The entire contempt petition is silent on the aspect whether that civil suit was finally decided or not and if decided, what is the final order passed in that suit. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/MAY 2010/cp174-10