IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 6869 OF 1999 And WRIT PETITION No. 26584 OF 1999 WRIT PETITION No. 6869 OF 1999: Between: The Management of Avanti Leathers Ltd., Factory situated at Avanti, Varadayapalem, Chittoor District, Rep. by its Director, Mr K.Ajay Kumar ..... PETITIONER AND The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Anantapur and another .... RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION No. 26584 OF 1999: Between: D.Chittibabu ..... PETITIONER AND Chairman Cum Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Anantapur and another .... RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 6869 OF 1999 And WRIT PETITION No. 26584 OF 1999 COMMON O R D E R: These two writ petitions are directed against the award dated 09.11.1998 in I.D.No.189 of 1995 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, Anantapur. W.P.No.6869 of 1999 is filed by the Management aggrieved by the impugned award directing reinstatement of the workman, where as W.P.No.26584 of 1999 has been filed by the workman (Chittibabu) challenging the same award to the extent of denial of back wages. When the matter is taken up for consideration, it is brought to my notice by the learned counsel for both parties that during the pendency of these writ petitions, a settlement has been entered into by the Management and the workman under Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ‘the Act’) and both the parties have agreed for the terms and conditions of the said settlement. Sri J.Sidda Reddy, the personal Management representing M/s Avanti leathers Limited, the petitioner in W.P.No.6869 of 1999 as well as Sri Chittibabu, petitioner in W.P.No.26584 of 1999, are present before this Court and they have been identified by the respective counsel appearing for them. A copy of the settlement under Section 18(1) of the Act, dated 23.04.2010, has also been placed before this Court and both the parties admitted the execution as well as the contents of the settlement. The learned counsel for both the parties submitted that having regard to the settlement, dated 23.04.2010, no further adjudication is necessary on merits and the Writ Petitions may be disposed of in terms of the settlement, dated 23.04.2010. Accordingly, these two Writ Petitions are disposed of in terms of the settlement, dated 23.04.2010. No costs. ____________ Date: 26.04.2010 G. ROHINI, J Ivd