IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.23140 of 2005 Between: Sri Panguluri Subba Rao S/o. Nagaiah R/o.D.No.7-2-91, Kabela Road Kakumanuvarithota, Guntur Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police Guntur Guntur District. 2 The Station House Officer L&O Police Station Arundalpet Guntur District. 3 Sri Aka Venkata Ramana Satya Dandaiah Pantulu S/o. Rama Rao R/o. 12/1, Arundalpet Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in interfering with the civil dispute relating to the premises D.No.6-4-84, 4/1, Arundalpet, Guntur as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and consequently direct the official respondents not to interfere with the said civil dispute, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.VENKATESWARLU POSANI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.23140 of 2005 ORDER: Petitioner seeks to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in interfering with the civil dispute relating to the premises bearing D.No.6-4-84, 4/1, Arundelpet, Guntur, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the official respondents not to interfere with the civil disputes. This court while admitting the writ petition on 27-01-2005, directed the respondents not to interfere with the civil dispute in respect of the premises bearing D.No.6-4-84, 4/1, Arundelpet, Guntur. Insofar as the civil disputes are concerned, I am of the opinion that the police cannot interfere with the civil disputes, as it is for the petitioner and the 3rd respondent to resolve the dispute before the civil court. Unless any complaint disclosing cognizable offence and FIR is registered, the police cannot interfere with the civil disputes. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the civil disputes without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 30-04-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{CHP}