IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6265 of 2007 Date of decision : December 06, 2007 Narinder Kumar ....Petitioner versus Rohit Seth ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pritam Pal Present : Mr. H.K.Aurora, Advocate, for the petitioner Pritam Pal,J. (Oral) Petitioner has brought this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside order dated 11.10.2007 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar, whereby the evidence of the defendant-petitioner has been closed by order of the court. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the material placed on the file, it appears that earlier also the petitioner was granted one last opportunity to produce his entire evidence at his own responsibility. A perusal of the impugned order indicates that inspite of ample opportunities, the petitioner, who is defendant before the trial court, again failed to adduce his entire evidence. In the given facts and circumstances, the petitioner does not deserve to be granted any other opportunity for adducing his evidence. Dismissed in limine. ( Pritam Pal ) December 06, 2007 Judge 'dalbir'