IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 334 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 334 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 334 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 200 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 200 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 200 The State of Maharashtra ] .. Applicant (Ori.Complainant) Versus 1.Prabhakar @ Balya Ragho Panchal & ors] .. Respondents Mrs. A.A. Mane, APP, for the applicant. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 26TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. On a perusal of the evidence, it is noticed that the accused persons were not identified by the witness Fatima. The view taken by the 6th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, City Sessions Court, Sewree, Mumbai, is a possible view. Leave to Appeal is rejected. Sd/- Sd/- [SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.]