(1) wp2138­11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2138 OF 2011 Bhagwan Raosaheb Mule PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS .... Mr. N.R. Bhavar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.V. Wagh, A.G.P. for the respondent/State. .... CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 24th MARCH, 2011 ORAL ORDER : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the Election Programme of respondent No. 4 ­ Society, published on 22nd February, 2011. The Election Programme has reached the stage of withdrawal of nominations. The challenge is solely on (2) wp2138­11 the ground, as submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner, that there are some errors in the names of some voters, who, according to the petitioner, belong to his group. Those persons are not before the Court. They have not made any grievance either before the Returning Officer or before this Court. Petitioner has not added those persons as parties, either as petitioners or respondents. It is not possible at this stage to verify whether there are errors, as contended by the petitioner, in names in the voters' list. Apart from that, the petitioner has approached this Court belatedly. The Election Programme, which is already set in motion, cannot be arrested for the reasons stated in the petition. In the circumstances, the petition is dismissed. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] NPJ/wp2138­11