(L'\-' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.1 WRITPETITION fS) N0. r2),^?5~ OF 2011 PETITIONER ^^^- y^ ^&®^' RESPONDENTS ^' ^r^ 2. 3. 4.' 5. 6. / Smt. Mamta Patel, wife of Shri Pradeep Kumar, aged about 35 years, Caste Kunbi, Resident of Village - Aghariyapara Goverdhanpur, Village Panchayat Sondeeha, Janpad Panchcyat Pratappur, District Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS ^" State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, Woman and Child Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Panchayat Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Surguja, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.C.) District Programme Officer, Woman and Child Development Department, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pratapur, District Surguja (C.G.) Smt. Rashmi Sachan, aged about 45 years, wife of Sanjay Patel, R/o Village Goverdhanpur, Village Panchayat Sondeeha, Janpad Panchayat Pratapur, District Surguja (C.G.) r ^ WRIT PFTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226^FTHE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA ^^€ ^1;,,J11^ '"''t»seaiE<' XI-HC—7S an^i 'W R-fi'* ^TajT SiTT^T^Hfcb Aj HI*ICII »»*<ra» 'T5ET ^|qid<1, •E9T)i<H'l<o, f^<rll'yLi< ^^ u5-f-c,. 3,7<?-5'/I1 V^IOO STI^CT^T (' p) TOIIWdft^ a:nt7T SB : HON'BLEjyR. JUSTltE PRTriNKER DIWAKER £.».»/. Shri Y. S. Thakur, D^ <)ii<itin<(l-i ^wS'? fe^t <ni|(^l< ii'siRnan^r Shri V. K. Pandey, coi(insel for the petltioner. '. A.G. for the respondent State. Challenge in the pr^sent wrlt petitlon is to the order dated 22.04.2008 (jajnnexure P-l) passed by the Director, Panchayat, Raipu Counsel for the petlt petitloner has an alternativje remedy of filing a revlsion before the State Governm^nt and therefore he may be permitted to withdraw this application !n accordance vji Permission granted. oner fairly submits that the petition with llberty to avail remedy of a revislon. Me fi^rther submits that the State Government may be direc(:ed to condone the delay in filing the revision. Counsel for the Stat^ submits that the petitioner cannot claim any relief ft|>r condonation of delay for fillng the revlsion before t(iis Court and it would be up to the appropriate autht>rity to consider the said ithlaw. i Accordingly the (^etition is dismissed withdrawn with the afores^id liberty. ^s T5i^ak»r