THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.6305 OF 2006 ORDER: The petitioner filed this revision under Article 227of the Constitution of India, inter alia, assailing the order dated 28.09.2006 in I.A.No.815 of 2006 in O.S.No.822 of 2004 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, in rejecting the application filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to send Ex.A1-promissory note along with admitted signatures of the defendant to handwriting expert. The Court below observed that no useful purpose would be served if comparison is made with the signatures appearing in written statement, because there is every possibility of defendant disguising his style of signature so as to make them appear dissimilar with the disputed signatures. Admittedly, the said exercise could not see the logical end in view of the absence of the signature at the relevant point of time, vis-à-vis, the signatures in the suit. Therefore, having regard to the said situation, the petitioner’s request to send the admitted signatures to the expert is wholly unsustainable and does not deserve merits and consideration. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 17th June 2010 RRB