03 ^ P jo^/ tNTyEHIGHCOURTOFJUDlCATURE.CHHATISGWHATBILASURL WRtT PETITION N0. 2-&BS OF 2005. " R PETfTtONER. / G.R. CHAUHAN, S/0 SHRI BHARAT RAM AGED »iBQUT50YEARS QUARtERNO.34, NEHRUNAAR, BILASPUR. C.G.STWE. VERSUS RESPONDENTS. o'.fi^^ ^^> w^y ;**' *. \.** _ />\ •*' y^.^. .^3f^ >-'"\^\ 'o.-Y'' ,?>y^<" ^•••' ys° 1) STATfc OF CHt-fATfSGARt-f Tt-iRU SECRETARY, -, FOREST DEPARTMENT, DKS8HM/AN, RAIPUR i) MMlAGiNG DIKECTOR, C.G.STWTE FQREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATtON, D-252ff53, SEGTOR 5, , ucVENDRA NAGAR, RAIPUR.. (C.GSTATE). .^^' •..-..:-.'•' .••1'.^ WRn- PETmON UNDER ARTIGLE 226/227 0F THE CQNSTrTLmQN OF tNDIA R3R ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE VWIT (S) / ORDER (S) / DIRECTfONfSi, ETC. XI-HC-22 sn^iw fewsn^r ^ItWdflCT r^^ / ^li-^ ' •^7 .•^ ^ 3^ 'itMMV, ^\W\<S, Blefl'K^i WW\ 4sl4» / 03. f. (Aa- •2-P?3/OS~' •41NMI shtiltb ••••••••••••••••••••• ^j- 200 Ri<i«^"""" 45 ail^KkflWBfer Fordst 8.7.2005 Petitioner by Shri K. R|. Respondent No. 1 by Heard. Leanaed counsel for order datcd 23.9.2003 fhe Pnaject Raage OfBcer in directed to officiate as ProJe|E vide ordcr dated 24.5.2005 to go to tus original post i.e. As the Project Offic^i -substantive post, the petit^i Project OfEicer because he basis; In view of the foregoiti|( petition wluch deserves tob( M(W)P No. 2416/2005 disposed of. EOiBle *wfci'i(1-f *ii<i<-iTffte^t<fSf'(<ii<. ^iSlRpTSn^TT Nair Advocate. ri Vroek Shanna, Paael Lamyer. HtUl Ijhe petitioner submits tbat vide Ipetitioner, who is an Assistant Developiaent Corporation was ;t OfiEicer tiU furthcr orders, but |the petitioner has beeu directed ^ssistauC Prqject Ksmye OScer. ^r has already becn ppsted on fc< foaev faas no right to work as |was worldng only on officiating *ud I do not fiad any ment in this andis dismissed. Consequentty I.A.N6. 5698/2005 stand SdA :,/" Satish K. Agnihotri ~ Judge (Ift^^M) f