IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11839 of 2008 REENA RAI, D/O SRI RAM KUMAR RAI, R/O VILLAGE-BANGARA, P.O.-NIKHAHI KALA, P.S.- RAGHUNATHPUR, DISTRICT-SIWAN. …………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SIWAN. 3. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, RAGHUNATHPUR, DISTRICT-SIWAN. 4. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, RAGHUNATHUR, DISTRICT-SIWAN. 5. MUNNA SAH, S/O SHRI JAIKISHUN SAH, R/O VILLAGE-GONAHARIA, P.S.-RAGHUNATHPUR, DISTRICT-SIWAN, MUKHIYA OF GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ KARSAR, P.S.-RAGHUNATHPUR, DISTRICT-SIWAN. 6. THE SECRETARY OF GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ KASSAR, P.S.-RAGHUNATHPUR, DISTRICT- SIWAN. …………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 17.10.2011 Petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the Block Development Officer dated 14.12.2007, as contained in Annexure- 9, by which his appointment as Panchayat Teacher has been cancelled. After amendment in the Rules in 2008 a statutory Appellate Authority has been constituted to hear appeals and grievances of Panchayat Teachers in respect of their service conditions. In the circumstances, petitioner is given liberty to file a representation before the statutory Appellate Authority constituted under the Rules, in terms of 2008 amendment, within four weeks from 2 today. If she does so, the Appellate Authority shall call for the records, shall issue notice to the concerned parties and shall decide the matter on merits without feeling any impediment from the said order of the Block Development Officer preferably within two months from the date of filing of the representation by the petitioner. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Arvind/ ( J.N. Singh, J.)