CRM-M No. 27153 of 2011 **** Raj Kumar v. State of Haryana Present: Mr. Vikrnt Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in Complaint case bearing No. 136 of 2005 titled as “Harbans v. Raj Kumar” pending in the Court of JMIC, Panchkula, under Sections 323, 420, 506 IPC, P.S.Raipur Rani, District Panchkula. Learned counsel has argued that since a civil dispute is also pending between the parties, the petitioner was under a mistaken impression that he does not have to appear. However, after arguing for some time learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will surrender before the trial Court and move an application for regular bail and the trial Court should be directed to decide his application for regular bail expeditiously. I find this to be fair request. In the circumstances this petition is dismissed but liberty is granted to the petitioners to surrender before the learned trial Court and move an application for regular bail. The learned trial Court is directed to decide the application for bail expeditiously but in any case within five days. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE September 07, 2011 sunita