HIGH COURT OF JUD‘CATURE AT B!LASPUR: Ci'ATTlSGARH kH Single Bench Hon’b!e Shri H.L. Dattu, OJ. Writ Petition No. 4838 Of 199'!" Petitioner Devkinandan, Son of Gopiram Agrawai, Rio. viilage Kotba, Tehsii Pattalgaon, Dist. Raigarh (MP) Vs. Respondents : 1 . Coilector cum Prescribed Authority, Janpath Panchayat, Pattalgaon, Dist. Raigarh ORAL ORDER (Passed on sai‘March, 2007) Sn my opinion, as on today, the reiief sought for by the petitioner in this petition wouid not survive for consideration of this Court. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of as having become unnecessary. (2) However, any observation made by the respondents- authorities while disquaiifying the petitioner would not come in the way of the petitioner in participating in any other eiection. Ordered accordingiy. Sdl- Chief Justice 2. Satyanarayan, son of Munsmram Sharma, Rio. Kotba, Tehsil Patta§gaon, Dist. Raigarh 3. Chandrasekhar. son of Premsai, R/o. Vil!age Kotba. Tehsil Pattaigaen, Dist. Raigarh 4. Pooranlal, son of Banwarila! Sharma, Rio. Vinage Kotba, Teh5il Pattalgaan, Dist. Raigarh Present: Shri Amrito Das, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.K. Agrawal, Dy, Advcmate Genera! for the State/respondent No.1 . None appears for other respondents.