1 S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. III BAIL APPLICATION NO.3370/2006 (Jarnail Singh Vs. State) Date of order : 7.8.2006 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. R.S. Gill, for the applicant. Mr. V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State. This is third bail application. Though the record of earlier two bail applications are not attached along with this third bail application but it is reported by Office that earlier two bail applications were rejected by this Court. It is also stated in the bail application by the learned counsel for the applicant under the “Notes” that earlier two bail applications were rejected by this Court. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that statement of PW-6 - injured - Roop Singh has been recorded by the court in which he has stated that no injury was caused by present applicant and the injuries were caused by one Jagraj Singh and Babli. Taking into consideration the facts and 2 circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. Accordingly, this third bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant Jarnail Singh S/o Sohan Singh shall be released on bail (in FIR No.455/2005, P.S. Hanumangarh Town) provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- and furnishes two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so, till the completion of trial. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun