IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11179 of 2009 DHARAMDEO SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 1.9.2009 Heard. Boring of Tube well under NABARD sponsored scheme was decided on R.S.Khata No.577, Plot No.72 of village Baghaila under Chand Anchal in the district of Kaimur. The Chief Engineer vide his communication no.851 dated 14.6.2007 authorised the Executive Engineer, Tube well Division, Mohania, to complete the work. There is communication dated 2.7.2008 vide letter no.152 of SDO, Mohania to the effect that the work was also taken at the site. Now, the petitioner alleges that for some extraneous consideration and political reasons without any rationality, the work has been stopped half way. This fact has been brought to the notice of Commissioner-cum-Secretary of Minor Irrigation Department, Government of Bihar, by the petitioner vide letter dated 21.1.2009. Since, no response has been given, hence the petitioner has moved before this Court. The Court fails to understand as to why the senior authorities of the State Government quietly ignore the grievance or a petition filed by a public. Because, if they do not respond to the grievance, the Courts are unnecessarily burdened with litigations of the type where no law is to be decided by the Court. The decision has been taken by a 2 competent authority i.e. under NABARD scheme and it should have been taken to its logical end till there is some impediment. Accordingly, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to Respondent No.2, the Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Minor Water Resources, Govt.of Bihar, to get the matter examined and appropriate steps be taken within a period of eight weeks from the date of production/communication of this order. SKBOSE (Ajay Kumar Tripathi)