..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9597 OF 2003 CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9597 OF 2003 CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9597 OF 2003 Dagu Punja Jadhav. ..Petitioner. Versus Versus Versus Doulat Narayan Kadale and Ors. ..Respondents. .. Mr.S.M.Sabrad, Adv. for the Petitioner. Mr.R.N.Gite, Adv. for Respondent Nos.2A to 2E. Petition dismissed as against Respondent Nos.1, 4-D & 5 as per Court’s order dated 13.4.2007. .. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : JANUARY 16, 2008. DATED : JANUARY 16, 2008. DATED : JANUARY 16, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. Original plaintiff No.4 - Vishwanath Narayan Kadale expired in the year, 1987. Thereafter an application was preferred by the heirs to bring them on record. As there was delay in preferring the application, it was also prayed that the delay in preferring the said application be condoned. The learned trial Judge by order dated 8.3.1999 condoned the delay and allowed the application for bringing the heirs on record in ..(2).. the interest of justice. 3. Looking to the facts stated in the application for bringing the heirs on record, the delay has been rightly condoned. No interference is called for in the order condoning delay and allowing the application to bring the heirs on record. Petition stands dismissed accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)