IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No. 169 of 2009 Date of Decision : January 29, 2009 Raj Singh .....Petitioner Versus Dhanpat Singh and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present : Mr. K.K. Gupta, Advocate T.P.S. MANN, J. Learned counsel contends that vide order dated October 23, 2008 passed by a Division Bench of this Court when C.W.P. No. 11428 of 2008, filed on behalf of the petitioner, was admitted, operation of Annexure P.18 therein, was stayed till further orders. Inspite of the same, the respondents have not refunded/released the amount, which already stood recovered from the petitioner on the basis of aforementioned order Annexure P.18 during the pendency of the petition. When asked as to when was the recovery effected from the petitioner, learned counsel submits that the same was done on 13.10.2008. Vide order, Annexure P.18 aforementioned in the writ petition, the amount already stood recovered from the petitioner and, that too, before the writ petition was admitted on 23.10.2008. While admitting the writ petition, the Bench only stayed the operation of the order Annexure P.18, but no directions were passed that the amount already recovered from the petitioner had to be released/refunded to him. C.O.C.P. No. 169 of 2009 -2- In view of the above, no relief can be granted to the petitioner in the present petition, which is, accordingly, dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to move an application before the writ Bench so as to seek clarification/modification of order dated 23.10.2008. ( T.P.S. MANN ) January 29, 2009 JUDGE satish