IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.245 of 2008 Date of decision: 7.10.2009 Iqbal Singh ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sh. Kehar Singh and another ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Manohar Lall, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the respondents. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents had violated the interim order granted under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC by the Additional District Judge (Ad hoc), Fast Track Court, Amabla dated 6.11.2007. Admittedly, the petitioner has a remedy to approach the Civil Court under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC for breach/disobedience of such an injunction order. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Food Corporation of India v. Sukhdeo Prasad 2009(2) RCR (Civil) 834, has held that when an interim order is disobeyed, contempt or penal proceedings do not lie as the aggrieved party has a remedy to file execution of the same. In view of the aforesaid, I am not inclined to proceed further in this contempt petition. Rule discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to pursue his remedy under Order 39 Rule 2A in accordance with law. October 7, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE