IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8700 of 2010 1. SHIV SHANKAR BHAGAT, SON OF SRI DHANUSDHARI BHAGAT 2. SHAMBHU BHAGAT, SON OF SRI DHANUSDHARI BHAGAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10/03/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner No. 2 is the brother-in-law of the deceased and there is no specific overt act against him, let the petitioner No. 2 above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Naugachia, in connection with Naugachia P.S. Case No. 144 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. So far as petitioner No. 1 is concerned, since there is - 2 - independent corroboration of the allegation made in the First Information Report, I am not inclined to grant bail to him. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)