IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2008 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 7448 of 2008(J) ------------------------------------ PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. ANNIE VINCENT, W/O. VINCENT, AGED 68 YEARS, ILLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, POTTAKUZHY , KALOOR. 2. P.A.PHILIMINA GEORGE, D/O. LATE ANTONY, AGED 52 YEARS, METHASSERY HOUSE, NO.29/2311, POONITHURA P.O., CHAMBAKKARA 682 019, KANAYANNUR TALUK. 3. P.A.MATHEW, S/O. LATE P.M.ANTONY, AGED 48, PULIPARAMBIL HOUSE, MARADU P.O., CHAMBAKKARA. 4. P.A.FRANCIS @ SABU, S/O. LATE P.M.ANTONY, AGED 38 YEARS, PULIPARAMBIL HOUSE, H.N.O.1/60, MARADU P.O., CHAMBAKKARA. 5. P.A.BENO, D/O. LATE P.M.ANTONY, AGED 50 YEARS, C/O. ARAVINDAN, PONNURUNNI, VYTTILA P.O., KOCHI 19. 6. ANNAKUTTY, AGED 70 YEARS, W/O. LATE P.M.JOSEPH, PULIPARAMBIL HOUSE, THAIKOODAM, VYTTILA P.O. 7. P.J.MATHEW, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. LATE P. M.JOSEPH, PULIPARAMBIL, THAIKOODAM. 8. P.J.THOMAS, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O. LATE P.M.JOSEPH, PULIPARAMBIL HOUSE, THAIKOODAM VYTTILA P.O. 9. PHILIMINA ANTONY, AGED 40 YEARS, D/O. LATE P.M.JOSEPH AND W/O. ANTONY, AKYATH HOUSE, THAIKOODAM , VYTTILA P.O. 10. P.J.VARGHESE, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O. LATE P.M.JOSEPH, PULIPPARAMBIL HOUSE, THAIKOODAM , VYTTILA P.O. BY ADV. SRI.BINDU SREEKUMAR W.P.(C) NO.7448/2008 RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. JOSEPH T.C., AGED 50, THOTTAKATH HOUSE, CHENNOOR, KOTHAD P.O. 2. SR.JISHA, AGED 24, D/O. ELIZABETH, P.S.SCHOOL OF NURSING, MARADU THRIPUNITHURA , KOCHI 682 304. 3. MARY MARGRET, AGED 22 YEARS, D/O. ELIZABETH, THOTTAKATH HOUSE, CHENNOOR , KOTHA P.O. 4. FRANCIS JOSEPH, AGED 21 YEARS, S/O. ELIZABETH, THOTTAKATH HOUSE, CHENNOOR KOTHA P.O. 5. MARY, AGED 45 YEARS, D/O. REASY, NADUVILAMANAKKAL HOUSE, S.CHITTOOR P.O. 6. SHEELA JAMES, AGED 38 YEARS, W/O. LATE JAMES, KANNIPPARAMBIL HOUSE, VALLARPADAM P.O. 7. SEBASTIAN JOSEPH, AGED 17 YEARS, S/O. LATE JAMES, KANNIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VALLARPADAM P.O., REP.BY GUARDIAN MOTHER SHEELA JAMES. 8. GIYA TRESSA AGED 16, D/O. LATE JAMES, KANNIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VALLARPADAM P.O., REP.BY GUARDIAN MOTHER SHEELA JAMES. 9. GEORGE MATHEW BABU, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O. LATE REASY, KANNIPPARAMBIL HOUSE, VALLARPADAM P.O.. KOCHI 31. 10. JOSEPH MARTIN @ ROY, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O. LATE REASY, KANNIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VALLARPADAM P.O. KOCHI 31. 11. P.XAVIER, S/O. LATE MARY, AGED 50 YEARS, PALLIKKAVEETTIL ST.MARTIN ROAD, MARADU NORTH, KOCHI 4. 12. P.F.GEORGE, S/O. LATE MARY, AGED 55 YEARS, KOTTARAM ROAD, VADUTHALA P.O. KOCHI 23. 13. PHILOMINA D/O. LATE MARY, AGED 65 YEARS, PUDUSSERY HOUSE, FR. MANUEL ROAD, N.NO. 119, KALOOR, KATRUKADAVU. W.P.(C) NO.7448/2008 14. ELIZABETH, D/O. LATE MARY, AGED 62 YEARS, NELKUNNASSERY HOUSE, E.S.I. ROAD, ERNAKULAM , COCHIN 18. 15. MARIYA JUSTIN @ RANSY, D/O. LATE MARY, AGED 48 YEARS, ARAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, VALLARPADAM P.O., KOCHI 31. 16. ELIZABETH, W/O. LATE ANTONY, AGED 84 YEARS, AZHEEPARAMBIL HOUSE, BASIN ROAD, ERNAKULAM , KOCHI. 17. JOSE JONAS @ JOHNY, S/O. LATE PHILOMINA, AGED 49, ST.MARY'S CHAPEL ROAD, THOPPUMPADY, KOCHI 5. 18. JOSEPHINE PHILOMINA @ SOPHY, D/O. LATE PHILOMINA, W/O. C.S. JOSEPH, AGED 47 YEARS, CHAMMINIKODATH, KOLLASSERY ROAD, KONAM , PALLURUTHY, KOCHI 6 . 19. JAMES, S/O. LATE PHILOMINA, KOLLANASSERY HOUSE, AGED 45, ST.MARY'S CHAPPEL ROAD, THOPPUMPADY, KOCHI 5. 20. MATHEWS @ SAJAN, S/O. LATE PHILOMINA ,KOLLANASSERY HOUSE, AGED 43, MARY'S CHAPEL ROAD, THOPPUMPADY, KOCHI 5. 21. JESSY MARY, D/O. LATE PHILOMINA AND W/O. K.J.THOMAS, AGED 41 YEARS, KELOTH HOUSE, KONAM, PALLURUTHY, KOCHI 6. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/ 03/2008 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 7448 OF 2008 --------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT This writ petition is preferred against the order of the Munsiff Court, Ernakulam, whereby he has directed delivery of the property. Petitioners before me are respondents in the final decree application. By virtue of a final decree judgment dated 28.7.2004, the court has passed the final decree. It is that allotment, which is put into execution by the party. Now the grievance of the writ petitioners is that the shares have not been properly allotted and there cannot be any delivery of the property in pursuance to the final judgment. 2. I cannot accept that argument. It is on record that the court below has proceeded to pass a final judgment and had passed it about four years back. It is too belated now to come to this court to contest the case under Order XXI Rule 29 or a writ petition for stay of execution of the decree. Therefore, I dismiss the writ petition. But, I make it clear that in case if the writ petitioners are able to prefer an appeal against the final judgment and if there is variance, then it is always for the court to pass order for restoration under Sec. 144 of the Civil Procedure Code. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE vps