IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.M-25644 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.9.2009. Kallu alias Rujdar and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Satish Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. RAJESH BINDAL J. **** The petitioners in the present case are accused in FIR No. 99 dated 21.3.2004. They were released on regular bail. On account of their non- appearance on 29.2.2008 non-bailable warrants were issued against them. Even on subsequent dates they failed to appear. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners that on 29.2.2008 the petitioners along with other persons had gone in Jamat for a period of 40 days, where they fell ill. However, the fact remain that even on the date fixed thereafter i.e. 2.5.2008 and on all subsequent dates of hearing, the petitioners did not appear in the Court. Considering the conduct of the petitioners, I do not find any reason to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The petition is dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 14.9.2009 JUDGE Reema