1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2065 OF 2008 Vimla Rajendra Pratap Gupta ..Petitioner versus Eena Shyamlal Teckchandani & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. S. H. Mishra for Petitioner. Ms. M. H. Mhatre – APP for State. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATED : 7TH AUGUST, 2009. P.C. : By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the Order of the Additional Sessions Judge dated 7th December 2007 dismissing the Revision filed by the petitioner. The trial court refused to issue process on the basis of the police report and on perusal of the statements recorded by the police. The petitioner sought prosecution of the respondents for forgery of certain cheques. The courts have found that the allegations regarding the forgery were made to the Criminal Court after as a counter blast to the suit filed by the respondents for recovery of money. The Civil Court has not given any finding that the cheques are forged. According to the petitioner the cheques had been issued by way of security. This aspect does not make any 2 difference on the question of forgery. It appears that the matter is covered by the observations of the Supreme Court in the case of Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. & Anr. vs. Rajiv Dubey [CDJ 2008 S.C. 2027] . Hence, no reason to interfere. Petition is dismissed. (S. A. BOBDE, J.)