IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 439 of 2010 Date of decision August 23, 2011 Jagdish Mittar ....... Petitioner Versus ICICI Bank ........Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Ashish Aggarwal , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Suri, Advocate for the respondent. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Learned counsel for the respondent states that payment has been received from the petitioner and the matter has been settled and the writ petition has become infructuous. The same be disposed of as such. 2. As ordered. 2. On the basis of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infrcutuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 23, 2011 archana