CRM-M No. 6601 of 2011 **** Daljit Singh vs. State of Punjab Present: Mr. Hitesh Sood, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gazi Mohammad, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing DDR No. 31 dated 4.12.2010, under Sections 341/324/323/148 and 149 IPC, (offence under Section 326 IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Kot Ishe Khan, District Moga and FIR No. 146 dated 4.12.2010, under Sections 452/323/148/149 IPC registered at Police Station Kot Ishe Khan, District Moga. On 03.03.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “ Learned counsel states that the present FIR is only a counter blast and Section 326 IPC has been added later on and that the alleged injury is only on the right wrist.” Learned DAG, on instructions from HC Avneet Singh, states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and no further recovery is to be made from him. Mr.Nakul Sharma, Advocate appearing on behalf of the complainant has argued that despite this fact the concession of anticipatory bail should not be granted to the petitioner because the injury attributed to him was declared grievous. Be that as it may, in case the petitioner is found guilty, he would be liable to suffer the punishment which should be imposed upon CRM-M No. 6601 of 2011 -2- him but at this stage his custodial interrogation, in my considered opinion, would not be necessary. Consequently, in case it is necessary to arrest the petitioner, he shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the investigating officer subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE April 26, 2011 sunita