IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13189 of 2010 1. PAWAN KUMAR S/O SHRI JAI MANGAL SINGH R/O VILL.- MUKUND DERA, P.O.- ATHAR, P.S.- NAWANAGAR THE DISTRICT OF BUXAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT AUTHORITY BUXAR THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, BUXAR 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, BUXAR 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, BUXAR 6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, CHAUSA, DISTT.- BUXAR 7. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, DUMRAON, DISTT.- BUXAR 8. THE GRAM PANCHAYAT, ATHAR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY UNDER NAWANAGAR, BLOCK IN THE DISTRICT OF BUXAR 9. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT ATHAR UNDER NAWANAGAR BLOCK IN THE DISTRICT OF BUXAR 10. KRISHNA PRASAD S/O SHRI MUNILAL PRASAD R/O VILL.- ATHAR, P.O.- ATHAR, P.S.- NAWANAGAR THE DISTRICT OF BUXAR ----------- 02. 13.4.2011 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Challenge has been made to Annexure-6, which is the order passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority. Matter related to appointment of the petitioner as a teacher way back in the year 2006. It is evident that the issue of non-selection of the petitioner has been raised before the tribunal only in the year 2009. It has been held by several Benches of this Court that there has to be some kind of time limit within which 2 appointment ought to be challenged. Even otherwise findings being what they are, this Court is not willing to interfere with the order specially when appointment relates to the year 2006 and the appointee has already worked for almost five years now. Writ has no merit. It is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)