IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO 3870/07. Smt. Kantabai Bhayade ..vs.. State =================================== CORAM: S.R. DONGAONKAR,J. DATE:26.3.2008. Heard Mr. Abdul Bashir, Advocate for applicant and Mr. Patel, A.P.P. for respondent No.1. None present for the respondent no.2. Notice issued to respondent no.2 is received back for want of correct address. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the address mentioned on the notice of respondent no.2 was correct. It is informed that the lower court has fixed the matter for recording statements of the accused persons today. It means that the prosecution evidence is over, as such no question of tampering with the prosecution evidence would arise. As regards the threats allegedly given by respondent no.2, offence has been registered and he is separately proceeded for the same. In these circumstances, the grievance in this application does not survive. However, as it is contended that the respondent no.2 is still giving threats to the applicant, applicant is granted liberty to move the trial court for cancellation of bail, if necessary, which if filed the learned trial Judge shall decide expeditiously. Application stands disposed of. JUDGE smp.