IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3261 of 2002 1. DEVENDRA RAI S/O LATE FAKIRA RAI 2. JAGDISH RAI, S/O LATE FAKIRA RAI 3. MAHENDRA RAI S/O LATE FAKIRA RAI 4. KISHUN RAI @ KISHUNDEO RAI S/O OF JAGDISH RAI, ALL R/O VILLAGE- JAHANGIRPUR PATERHA PS. LALGANJ, DISTT- VAISHALI------- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION OF BIHAR,PATNA 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 4. CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, LALGANJ, VAISHALI 5. CHAIRMAN, ZILA PARISHAD, VAISHALI 6. NARSING CHOUDHARY 7. GANESH CHOUDHARY 8. RAM BABU CHOUDHARY,ALL SONS OF LATE SRI CHAND CHOUDHARY, R/O VILLAGE SARAI @ AKBAR MALAHAI SARAI, PO & PS- SARAI, DISTT- VAISHALI--- RESPONDENTS ----------- FOR THE PETITIONERS: Mr. Din Bandhu Singh,Advocate FOR THE RESPONDEDNTS: Mr. Shrinandan Pd.Singh, & Mr.Ashok Kumar, Adovcates FOR THE STATE: Mr. Braj Kishore Singh ,JC to SC-12 -------- 5 15.1.2009 After having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel representing the private respondents, this Court is of the considered opinion that the order contained in annexure-5 does not suffer from any infirmity which requires interference, more so under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. If the petitioners still feel that they have a case claiming the right over the disputed land, they may knock the door of the civil court once the Consolidation Proceedings comes to an end in the concerned area if it has not come to an end till date. This writ application is dismissed with the above liberty. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)