IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5019 of 2011 1. SHASHI BHUSHAN SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM KRIPAL SINGH 2. DILIP KUMAR SINGH @ DILLU SON OF SHASHI BHUSHAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.5073 of 2011 1. SHASHI BHUSHAN SINGH, SON OF LATE KRIPAL SINGH 2. DILIP KUMAR SINGH @ DILLU, SON OF SHASHI BHUSHAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.5098 of 2011 SHASHI BHUSHAN SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM KRIPAL SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.5055 of 2011 SHASHI BHUSHAN SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM KRIPAL SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.4.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 16(1)(a-1) and 7(iii) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, It is alleged against the petitioners to have manufactured the tobacco (Gutka) without any valid license. It appears that the inspection was done on 27.3.2010 when a substantive case was registered by the Police and considering the entire matter the petitioners were granted anticipatory bail by the learned court below on 21.6.2010. It appears that the present four complaints were lodged on 21.5.2010 making accusation that the - 2 - alleged Gutka, cardamom and other raw materials were found to be adulterated. I think the Complainant ought to have submitted the report in the Police case itself because the basis of lodging the complaints is the same seizure dated 27.3.2010. Considering the fact that for the same accusation the substantive case was lodged and the petitioners were granted anticipatory bail by the court below, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of 12 weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case nos. (C.B. Case no.) 20 of 2010, 18 of 2010, 21 of 2010 and 19 of 2010 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Patna City, Distt. Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Narendra/S. Ali ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. )