Blagfe ^s-pgh l^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w.p. rsi NO. /2009 PETITIONER .->•• RESPONDENTS '<<' ^MM/^ \Y> ^- — ~^.''C^'\ ^ <»' / j a {s.si.^ 4 o° l?A. v^-- -^ ^/ ^'fn&y^/ Jadho Naik, S/o. Late Shri Parasram Naik, aged about 56 years, R/o. Village Kokobhata, Post-Bhithidih, Via-Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^' 2. ' The Director, Directorate of Public Education, Raipur (C.G.) 3, "" Mission Director, State Project Office, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Collector & District Mission Director, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 5. District Education Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 6. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Janpad Panchayat Avam District Project Director, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Mahasamund (C.G.) (^' 7. Block Education Officer, Block- Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 8. Devnarayan Jangade, Block Resources Center Co-ordinator, Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA —78 <(Wdl (h*ll<!b 'S^T "41'41d'4, OTil'M'ls, [qciiyy ^^.:.^.^M:.Sh..^.2^^., ^^••^200 ^ sn^i iT^7 (Tpf3^[) an^iqiTftFiRT WT o'ti^fiaiNiqr) -^ TOIIW ^itef 3iA?i SB l HON'aLE SIIM JUE1TIC3 16.07.2009 •i Shri Raghaveridra Pradh[ Shri Shashank Thakur, ^s.;oa-o igggjjg^gg ^ the pre4 ,,^Q.l3&.2Q09 (Annexure P.1) by -tt:PjSin"S1:''the post of Headmasi|i parent departinent. an, counse! tbr the Detitioiner. P.L. forthe State, ;nt petition is to the order dated svhich the petitioner has been directed er in Oovemment Middie School at his ; ;; s. „ Contention o; counsel fc|; - w1.. €f deputation and he has Gompl<| •thersfore as per the deputatioil his preserit place of posting for Contention of counsel ft make a.representation to res^ decided in accordance with law| Counsel for the oetitiol However he submits that a diit concerned to decide the repif accordance witb law. Accordingly, the petition petitioner to make a representt the date of receipt ofj-he co] decided within a peribd of threEJ |r the petitioner ;s that he v/as sent 6n ited one year and eleven raonths and rules, he is still entitied to remain in lanotner month. t>r the State is that let the oetitioner fondent.No.4 and the sajne wouid be +I^I<rl4t^ ltTTIRff ^f 'fecst <Fii^i< ^?3(fiTT3lA?I PRXTISKER_D!WAKER. [i6r aarees to raake a reoressntation. sction may be issued to the authority isentation so made expeditiously in tfet is disposed of with a direction to the ition within a period of ten days from >y of this order, the same would be weeks from the date of its receipt. Sd/- PritinkerDiwaker Judge ^s-^xa^yCT.y?1'f 'Uh.-