IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 6TH JANUARY 2009 / 16TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 38057 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- LEELA, AGED 53 YEARS, W/O. SUDHAKARAN, CHEMBAKATH HOUSE, CHOWALLOOR DESOM, KANDANASSERY VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. [ANGANWADY WORKER, A.W.NO.91, GURUVAYOOR MUNICIPALITY] BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. REGIONAL ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, OFFICER OF THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.38057/2008-E ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 6th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is an Anganwady Worker under the second respondent. She was initially working at the Anganwady situated at Kadappuram (Anganwady No.1). She was transferred as per Ext.P1 from Anganwady No.109 to Anganwady No.91. The said order stands cancelled by Ext.P2. Pursuant to Ext.P2, she has gone back to the earlier place. She is aggrieved by the observations made by the second respondent in Ext.P2, which according to her is derogatory and unfounded. It is also submitted that various allegations have been made against her without putting them to her notice also. She has caused to issue Ext.P3 lawyer notice. But as she has not received any reply, and as the adverse comments made in Ext.P2 have also not been withdrawn, she has approached this Court with this writ petition. 2. Since the petitioner is still aggrieved by the remarks in Ext.P2, she will have to invite the attention of the first respondent, who will have to W.P.(C) No.38057/2008 -:2:- look into the matter after hearing the petitioner also. To enable the first respondent to do so, the petitioner will file a representation before the first respondent within two weeks from today, and the first respondent will consider and take appropriate action in the matter within a further period of two months thereafter. The writ petition is closed. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms