HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.2640 of 2010 Dated: 9th February, 2010 Between: Malla Ramesh Kumar. … Petitioner And Greater Visakhapatnam of Municipal Coproration, Represented by its Municipal Commissioner. … Respondent Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N. Ranga Reddy, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondent. Petitioner claim to be the owner of an extent of 124.05 sq. yards consisting of a plot bearing D.No.11-76, situated beside the Main Road Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. His grievance is that the respondent is trying to demolish his property for expanding existing roads, for Bus Rapid Transit System, without following due process of law. When the matter is taken up, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that respondent is not demolishing the property of the petitioner and if the property is required for road widening, due process of law, as contemplated under Sections 146 and 147 of Hyderabd Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 will be followed. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the submission made by the learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondent to follow due process of law, if the property of the petitioner is required for the purpose of road widening. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. __________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 9th February , 2010 Note: Furnish copy by two days B.O. LMV