IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13096 of 2001 SAKUNTALA DEVI @ SHINTA DEVI Versus THE PATNA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ----------- 5. 31.3.2009 Surendra/ The order of demolition passed by the Vice Chairman, Patna Regional Development Authority, and affirmed by the appellate Tribunal cannot be interfered by this Court, especially when it becomes clear from the perusal of the counter affidavit that the story of dead end in public gali was found to be absolutely false and incorrect. The petitioner in fact throughout the proceedings had contended that there was a public gali in which construction was made by him by treating it to be a dead end but then as in course of enquiry it has been found to be a public land without any dead end, the decision taken by the authorities for removal of encroachment made by the petitioner cannot be said to be bad either on fact or in law. That being so, agreeing with the submission of the counsel for the P.R.D.A. this application must be and is hereby dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)