IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2011 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 12569 of 2009(M) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. BEENA BEEVI, D/O. NAZEERA BEEVI, AGED 21 YEARS, KUNNILVEEDU, MUTTAPPALAM, NADAYARA, (VIA) VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. NAZEERA BEEVI, W/O. ABDUL LATHEEF, KUNNILVEEDU,MUTTAPPALAM, NADAYARA, (VIA) VARKALA, THIURUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. ABDUL LATHEEF, S/O. NINAN MUHAMMED, KUNNILVEEDU, MUTTAPPALAM, NADAYARA, (VIA) VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.HABEEB RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA POLICE STATION, VARKALA,TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VARKALA POLICE STATION,VARKALA, TRIVANDRUM. 3. THE RIYAZ.B., S/O.BASHEER, RIYAS VILLA, 12 MURI NAGAR,PATTAMALA,KOLLAM. 4. NOORJAHAN, W/O.BASHEER, RIYAS VILLA, 12 MURI NAGAR,PATTAMALA,KOLLAM. 5. BASHEER.E.,RIYAS VILLA, 12 MURI NAGAR,PATTAMALA,KOLLAM. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.C.M.CHARISMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 12569/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE DATED 15/04/2009. P2: COPY OF THE SALE DEED DATED 30/10/2008 P3: COPY OF THE TAXRECEIPT DATED 15/12/2008. P4: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 17/04/2009 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs R.BASANT & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) NO:12569 OF 2009 M ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th March, 2011. JUDGMENT Basant, J. Petitioners have come to this Court with this petition claiming police protection against her husband and in-laws. First petitioner is the wife and petitioners 2 and 3 are the minor children of the third respondent. Respondents 4 and 5 are the parents-in-law of the first petitioner. Sixth respondent is her brother-in-law. According to the first petitioner she is being vexed and harassed by the party respondent to sell the property in which she resides. There is also threat of physical violence against her. 2. This petition filed as early as on 20-4-2009 remains without disposal even now. When the matter came up for admission hearing, after admission interim direction was issued to respondents 1 and 2 police officials “to see that the life of the petitioners is adequately protected.” WPC 12569/2009 2 Thereafter the case has not come up for hearing. Interim order is remaining in force from 21-4-2009. Respondents though served have not chosen to enter appearance. 3. The learned Govt. Pleader after taking instructions from respondents 1 and 2 submits that there is absolutely no threat to the life or person of the petitioners. In these circumstances no directions are necessary now under Art.226 submits the learned Govt. Pleader. If there be any threat to the life or person of the petitioners, necessary action shall be taken by respondents 1 and 2 submits the learned Govt. Pleader. 4. We take note of the submissions of the learned Govt. Pleader. We take note of the fact that after 21-4-2009 there has been absolutely no event justifying or fortifying the apprehension of the petitioners. We are satisfied in these circumstances that it is not necessary to continue the interim order endlessly. We accept the submission of the learned Govt. Pleader. We are satisfied no further directions are necessary. 5. This writ petition is in these circumstances dismissed. R.BASANT Judge K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj WPC 12569/2009 3 WPC 12569/2009 4