IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15823 of 2008 PIKKU KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 24.6.2008 Heard. The case is under Section 392 IPC. The petitioner is not named in the FIR who was not identified in the first test identification parade held on 2.1.2008 but in the second test identification parade dated 24.1.2008 the same informant identified the petitioner. The contention is that after holding of the first test identification parade there is a chance that the petitioner was brought to the court without taking precautionary measure so as to avoiding identification of the witnesses. Regard being had to the above fact and the conflict result on the test identification parade, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Kotwali P.S.Case no.270 of 2007. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )