WP No. 1114/2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1114 OF 2009 Mangal d/o. Narsingrao Devkar, R/o. Pangra Under Lakh, Tq. Aundha (Nagnath), Dist. Hingoli. ....Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents. Mr. H.I. Pathan, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.J. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent No. 1. Mr. S.R. Bagal, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Mr. B.V. Dhage, Advocate for respondent No. 5. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & T. V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATED : 9th September, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she was appointed as 'Anganwadi Sevika'. On complaint filed by respondent No. 5, the petitioner was not issued appointment order. 3. The learned counsel for the Zilla Parishad submits that by communication dated 22.10.2008, it has been informed to the WP No. 1114/2009 2 petitioner that the Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad intimated Bal Vikas Prakalp Adhikari that in the light of complaint filed against the petitioner, no sanction should be granted and further directed to start process for filling the said post. Learned counsel for Zilla Parishad further submits that the communication would mean that the petitioner's appointment has been cancelled. In the light of the interim order passed by this Court fresh recruitment on the said post could not take place, according to counsel. 4. We have perused the judgment cited by the learned counsel for the petitioner reported in 2011 (2) Mh.L.J. 221 [Vidya w/o. Vishnu Vanare Vs. State of Maharashtra]. We find that in the light of statement made made by the learned counsel for the Zilla Parishad, the petitioner has alternate, efficacious remedy against the cancellation of her selection on the subject post. Petition is disposed of. All issues are kept open. Interim relief granted by this Court to continue for four weeks, from today. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] [ NARESH H. PATIL, J.] ssc/wp1114/09