THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA Writ Petition No.23851 of 2006 Dated: 17th November, 2006 Between: Smt. P.Vijaya Lakshmi and others. …..PETITIONER AND Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep by Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another. ….RESPONDENTS THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA W.P.No.23851 of 2006 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondents in not enhancing the remuneration as per G.O.Rt.No.2501, dated 13-7-2006 and G.O.Rt.No.963, dated 28-8-2006 as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to release the remuneration to the petitioners as per G.O.Rt.No.2501, dated 13-7-2006 and G.O.Rt.No.963, dated 28-8- 2006. Though the petitioners raised several grounds in the writ petition it is their admitted case that they are the employees of the 2nd respondent/Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad through a contractor and they have not made the contractor as party to the writ petition. Petitioners relying upon G.O.Rt.No.2501, dated 13-7-2006 and G.O.Rt.No.963, dated 28-8-2006 sought direction to the respondents to pay the salaries fixed for the outsourcing persons in the above said G.Os. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for 1st respondent/Municipal Administration and the learned Standing Counsel for the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad. Admittedly, the petitioners are the employees through a contractor in the 2nd respondent/Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad and the contractor was not made as party to this writ petition. The petitioners being the employees through a contractor cannot seek direction to the 2nd respondent/Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad for payment of salaries as per the above said G.Os. This writ petition is misconceived one. The petitioners instead of approaching the proper forum against the contractor have approached this court. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, it is open for the petitioners to approach the proper forum against the contractor who engaged them in the 2nd respondent/Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad for payment of salaries as per G.O.Rt.No.2501, dated 13-7- 2006 and G.O.Rt.No.963, dated 28-8-2006. No costs. ___________________ (N.V. RAMANA, J.) Date:17th November, 2006. Grk