IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT TUESDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2008 / 11TH POUSHA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 8098 of 2007() ----------------------------- CRIME NO. 333/07 OF THENHIPALAM POLICE STATION PETITIONER/ACCUSED ----------------------------------- 1. ASRAF AREEKADAN, S/O.MARAKKAR, AGED 23 YEARS, KOLLAMCHINAKKAL HOUSE, PERUVALLOORE P.O., THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DIST. 2. MOOYIKKAN MANSOOR ALI, S/O.ASSAIN, AGED 19 YEARS, CHODALAKANDI HOUSE, POTTAMMAL MADU, PERUVALLOORE P.O., THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DIST. 3. P.C.MUNAUVIR, S/O.MOHAMMED, AGED 19 YEARS, PALAMADATHIL, CHOLAKKAL, POTTAMMAL MADU, PERUVALLOORE P.O., MALAPPURAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.T.V.GEORGE RESPONDENTS: ------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. S.U. NAZAR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A.No. 8098 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of January, 2008 O R D E R Second application for anticipatory bail. An earlier identical application filed by the petitioners was dismissed by this court as per order dt. 1.11.2007 in B.A.No. 6461 of 2007. The said application was dismissed with the observation that the petitioners must surrender before the Investigating Officer or the learned Magistrate and then seek regular bail. 2. The petitioners have come again to this Court and it is incumbent on them to show the change of circumstance to justify the prayer for fresh entertainment of application for anticipatory bail. What is the change in circumstance? Except that the second accused has already been arrested and released on bail, no other circumstances are pointed out to this Court at all. The learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that no serious investigation is being conducted by the police into the present crime. B.A.No. 8098 of 2007 2 3. I need only mention that I am unable to find any change in circumstance which would justify a fresh consideration of the application for anticipatory bail after dismissal of the earlier application dt. 1.11.2007. 4. This application is in these circumstances dismissed. (R. BASANT) Judge tm