[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.255 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.378 OF 2006 Sou.Sadhana Shrikant Kamble ..Applicant Vs. Shri.Shrikant Govind Kamble and Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.Shrikant Yadav Adv. on behalf of Mr.Dilip Bodke Advocate for applicant Mr.Sandeep Kurne Adv. for Respondent No.1 Smt.A.J.Jhaveri APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JANUARY 14, 2008 DATE : JANUARY 14, 2008 DATE : JANUARY 14, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant, the learned advocate for the Respondent No.1 and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant-wife was granted maintenance at the rate of Rs.1000/- per month by the learned Sessions Judge, Satara. Being aggrieved by the said order, the Respondent-husband has preferred Writ Petition No.378 of 2006. In the said petition, rule came to be granted and the order of [-2-] learned Sessions Judge came to be stayed. The applicant-wife is seeking vacating of the said order by the present application. 3. The learned advocate for the applicant-wife has stated that in view of the fact that Writ Petition No. 378 of 2006 is placed on the board for final hearing in the week commencing from 28.1.2008, he is not pressing the prayer for vacating the stay at this stage and he seeks liberty to prefer a separate application at a later stage if felt necessary. Liberty as prayed for, is granted. In view of the statement made by the learned advocate for the applicant, application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]