HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAmi AT BILASPUR MISC. APPBAL No. 920 OF 2003 APPELLANT NON-CLAIMANT RESPONDBNTS CLAIMAJITS Versus 1. 2. 3. NON-CLAIMANT No. 2 Oriental Iiisurajice Coinpaiiy Ltmited, Shyarsi Market, Paadri, Raipur. Durpat Bai, widow of Late Paras Rani Sahu Ku. Jaya Sahu, D/o Late Paras Rasii Sahu Mao.ikaat Sahu, S/o Paras Raoi Sahu AU resideuts of near Shiv Mandir, Khamhardih, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh). M/s GanesliBial K. Jadwaiii, Contractors, neai' Nalghai', Ainericaii Church, Raipur, Distdct Raipur (Chhattisgarh). MBMO OF APPEAL UHDER SECTION 30 OF WORKMEN COMPENSATION ACT,1923. (SB sHon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri RajendraTripathi, Advocate for fhe appeUaiit Shri. N.K. Vyas, Advocate for tlie respondent No. 2. ORAL- ORDER (Passedoa 13/5/2009) 1. By this appeal appeUant has challenged the award dated 1/8/2003 passed by the Commissiouer, Workmen Compensation Cum Labonr Court, Raipur ia case N0. B-124/WC Act Fatal/2001 whereby Com.niissioner, Workmen Conipensatiou has awaixled Rs. 162224/- on accotuit of the death of labour Paras Raoi Sahu to tlie legal representatives of fhe deceased Pai'as Raoi Saliu. 2. Awai'd is challenged on tlie ground tliat flie atleged poMcy was come mto existence at 0.00 hours from 4/4/2001 and accideut took place at 3.30 P.M. on 4/4/2001 aad therefore present appeUan.t is not Uable for aay compensation. 3. Shri Rajendra Tripatlii, Aclvocate for fhe appeUan.t aiid Shri N.K, Vyas, Advocate for the respondent No, 2 are heard, ^O^^.J..... ^"^.^' '> .r.- ..?•" '";<:'.\ -^lJ^r^ ."^ ^ '•^^^: ->^ 4. 5. 6. z Awai'd iaipugned aad record oftiie Court below perused. According to tlie copy of fhe aUeged iasurance alleged iasuraace was effective from 0.00 hours on 4/4/2001 to 3/5/2001 aad after 15 hours oftiie msuraace aUeged mcident took place as a result of such iacident Paras Raai Sahu was helper aiid working under the respondent N0. 2 was died, undisputedly respondent N0, 2 is Uable for damages/ coiiipensation on account of fhe deatii of fhe Paras Raoi Sahii and on fhe ground of nisuraiice the present appeUaiit is Mable for conipensation. Court below has uot com.initted aay illegality or iafirmity ia awarding the compensation or fastbig fhe Uability on fhe appeUaat. ConsequenUy, I do not fiiid aay nierits ia fhe appeal aiid same is Mable to be disiaissed and it is hereby dismissed at the stage of admission, No order as to costs. ! T.P. Sharma Judge f-/-