IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11583 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 05, 2010. R.L.Saini .....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Pritam Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a direction to the official-respondents to take action against respondent No.6 who is stated to be running a School in the residential house/building despite an undertaking/orders passed by this Court. The petitioner's case is that a statement was made on behalf of respondent No.6 before this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.4290 of 2010 decided on 16.3.2010 , that the preparatory school has already been closed and shall not been opened. However, despite such statement, the school is still running. In support of this, certain photographs have been appended with the writ petition. In this regard, the petitioner has served the official C.W.P.No .11583 of 2010 2 respondents with a legal notice dated 19.4.2010 (Annexure P-5) to take action against respondent No.6 for willful disobedience of the statement made before this Court. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Ambala and the Estate Manager, Housing Board, Baldev Nagar, Ambala City to consider the afore-mentioned legal notice served on behalf of the petitioner and take action against respondent No.6 in accordance with law, if so required, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 05, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE