IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46689 of 2009 NAGESHWAR RAI Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 02.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Single incident of assault was in nature of torture which was for non-fulfillment of demand but that was made only after informant’s Donga to in-laws’ house. Really, if there was any demand for purchase of tractor that would have been made at the occasion of Donga at informant parents’ house. Husband is specifically alleged for repeated knife blow and has been allowed regular bail, while petitioner’s another son has been allowed anticipatory bail by the Sessions Judge itself. According to the learned counsel, differences were in between the wife and husband for otherwise cause. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 64 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Sitamarhi subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)