* <'L-F~ i.«vi IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( C ) No. z 6 q ^ Of 2011 PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS: Mahendra Bala S/o Late Rampad, aged about 75 years, R/o Village Kanchan Nagar, Tambeshwar Nagar, TahsU Pal, District Surguja (CG). Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Co- operative Societies Departoient, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG), 3. That Deputy Registrar, Co- operative Societies, Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG). 4. The Bank Manager, Zila Sahakari Krishi Aur Gramin Vikas Bank, Branch RamanujganJ, District Surguja (CG). 5. The Sales Officer , Surguja Zila Sahakari Bhumi Vikas Bank Maryadit, Branch Ramanujganj, District Surguja (CG). 6. SurguJa Zila Sahakari Bhumi Vikas Bank Maryadit Ambikapur, Disti-ict Surguja (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^€ ^l^ ^ww ^yy HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmQNER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETI'HON fC) No. 2644 of20U Maliendra Bala. VERSUS The State ofChliattisearli & C)tht WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 QF THECONSTTTUTION OF E'iDIA 11 B iri, -j. Present: Shri Afvmd Sinha. Advocate for tiie petitioner. Slm V.V.S.Moorthy, De.puty Advocats Geaeral State.Tespondent No. 1 to 3.' (Passed on 13m day ofMay, 2011) 1. Leanied counsel appearmg for the petitioner, on iastriictions, seeks pennission oftliis Court to withdraw tiiis petition with liberty to take recouree to alteniative statuton' forum under tlie provisions of law i.e. Chliattisearh Cooperative Societies Act. 1960. 2.. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objeetion, 3. 'It is ordered accordinglv. 4, Coasequetitly, the writ petiiioii is dismissed as witlidrawn with the aforestated liberty, ifso advised. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge