IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3860 of 2010 MURLIDHAR SAH Versus THE ADMINISTRATOR, BIHAR STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD, PATNA & ORS. ----------- 09. 30.03.2011 Heard Mr. R.N. Mukhopadhyaya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, learned Assisting counsel to S.C. 14 for the State and its authorities including the authorities of the erstwhile Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board (since repealed under the Act of 2006). Pursuant to the order of this Court the authorities of the erstwhile Board have produced before this Court the entire ledger pertaining to the Contributory Provident Fund calculation of the petitioner maintained in the Board in terms of Rule 30 of the Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board Contributory Provident Fund Regulations, 1978. The Board have also filed a comprehensive supplementary show cause giving details of the calculation in relation to the provident fund of the petitioner and the documents on which the calculations are based. It is stated in paragraph 7 and 8 of the supplementary show cause that upon calculation being made it came to the knowledge of the Board that the petitioner has been paid an excess payment towards contributory provident fund. The details can be found in the show cause as well as the supplementary show cause of the 2 petitioner. Mr. R.N. Mukhopadhyaya, learned counsel for the petitioner disputes the calculation and submits that yet the interest element has not been properly calculated. As the issues pending before this Court involve accounting disputes, this Court would not delve into such disputed arena and for that the petitioner would be at liberty to question the calculations before an appropriate forum by filing an appropriate application and which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. However, in so far as the insurance claim of the petitioner is concerned, it is stated that the required formalities have been completed and the papers have been forwarded to the Life Insurance Corporation of India, Patna through Memo No. 733 dated 10.03.2011, copy whereof is placed at Annexure-G to the supplementary show cause for ensuring payment of the insurance claim of the petitioner. In that view of the matter, this contempt application stands disposed of with a request to the Life Insurance Corporation of India to ensure an early payment of the insurance amount of the petitioner and remit the same to the Board for its onward payment to the petitioner. The Board would also take all possible steps to ensure the payment of insurance amount through the process of the Life Insurance Corporation of India so that it is made over to the 3 petitioner within a period of six months from today. With the above observations/directions, the application stands disposed of. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)