:1: :1: :1: srp. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6492 OF 2008. WRIT PETITION NO. 6492 OF 2008. WRIT PETITION NO. 6492 OF 2008. Murlidhar Tukaram Bhise. ..Petitioner. Versus. The Mahabaleswhar Giristhan Municipal Council & Ors. ..Respondents. --- Ms. Manjiri Parsnis for the petitioner. Mr. Dilip Bodake for the respondent no.4. Mr. Ganesh Gole for respondent nos. 1 to 3. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATE: February 24, 2009. DATE: February 24, 2009. DATE: February 24, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. Order dated 16th February 2008 passed by the Municipal Council is challenged by the respondent. It appears that the permission was granted by the Municipal Council to connect the drainage lines and the said order was passed on 4/2/2008. However Mr. Ratikant Toshaniwal who is a respondent made a complaint to the Municipal Council and produced on record the certified copies of the decree passed in Regular Civil Suit No. 146 of 1991 and appeal No. 162 of 2002. It is to be noted that there is a decree of permanent injunction operating as against the petitioner and having perused the said decree, the Municipal Council has temporarily withdrawn the permission granted on :2: :2: :2: 4/2/2008. It has also sought an opinion from the legal advisor of the Council. 2. It further appears that the petitioner has already challenged the decree passed in the above referred suit by filing Second Appeal No. 885 of 2007 and certain interim orders have been passed in favour of the petitioner. Therefore the matter is pending before this Court in Second Appeal. If the protection orders are passed by this Court in the said appeal in favour of the petitioner, then on that basis the petitioner can approach to the Municipal Council for further reliefs in the matter. The facts may be as it is, we find that, the case is being fought in multiple forums simultaneously by the petitioner. In fact the grievance made before this Court in the present petition can be made in the Second appeal before the Single Judge by filing an appropriate civil application and/ or the petitioner can approach to the Municipality and request to decide its representation. Viewed from any angle, we do not find any substance in the petition. Petition deserves to be rejected and accordingly it is rejected. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)