IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH AUGUST 2008 / 15TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 19609 of 2008(H) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA.420/05 IN OS.465/2004 of MUNSIFF COURT.,VADAKKANCHERRY .................... PETITIONER: ------------ MARIYAM, AGED 66 YEARS, D/O. VATTAKKUNNEL JOSEPH, PANNISSERY DESOM, MANNALITHARA VILLAGE, TALAPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.B.PRAJITH RESPONDENTS: ---------------- 1. JOY, S/O. VATTAKKUNNEL JOSEPH, PANNISSERY DESOM, MANNALITHARA VILLAGE, TALAPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. THRESIA, W/O. PUTHUR ANTONY, PANNISSERY DESOM, MANNALITHARA VILLAGE, TALAPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. ANTONY, PANNISSERY DESOM, MANNALITHARA VILLAGE, TALAPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. RIMMI, S/O. ANTONY, PANNISSERY DESOM, MANNALITHARA VILLAGE, TALAPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. JENNY, S/O. ANTONY, PANNISSERY DESOM, MANNALITHARA VILLAGE, TALAPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SURAJ.S FOR R2 TO 5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) 19609/08 APPENDIX PETITIONERS’ EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE TITLE DEED 2735/92 DT.3.8.92 EXT.P2:- TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT OF O.S.465/04 ON THE FILE OF MUNSIFF COURT, VADAKKANCHERRY EXT.P3:- TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST COMMISSION REPORT DT.18.10.04 EXT.P4:- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A. 1498/04 IN O.S.465/04 EXT.P5:- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 15.2.05 IN I.A. 1498/04 IN O.S.465/04 VACATIING THE INTERIM ORDER AS AGIANST THE PETITIONER EXT.P6:- TRUE COPY OF THE2ND COMMISSION REPORT DT.3.10.06 EXT.P7:- TRUE COPY OF THE AMENDED WRITTEN STATEMENT EXT.P8:- TRUE COPY OF THE AFIDAVIT FILED ALONG WITH I.A.420/05 FOR APPOINTING AN ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER EXT.P9:- TRUE COPY OF THE I.A. 420/05 FOR APPOINTING AN ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER EXT.P10:- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A. 420/05 IN O.S. 465/04 RESPONDENTS’ EXHIBITS:- NIL OKB/- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) NO. 19609 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 6th day of August, 2008 JUDGMENT This petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India challenging Ext.P10 order whereunder learned Munsiff dismissed I.A. 420 of 2005, an application for appointment of a commission. Appointment of a commission was sought to prove the case sought to be raised in the counter claim. Learned Munsiff dismissed the petition filed for permission to raise counter claim and consequently dismissed I.A.420 of 2005. I do not find any illegality or irregularity warranting interference in Ext.P10 order. The order dismissing the counter claim was set aside and remanded to the trial Court for fresh disposal. If on reconsideration of the application trial Court finds that petitioner is to be permitted to raise the counter claim then petitioner, is at liberty to move the learned Munsiff again for appointment of a commission. In that event Ext.P10 order will not operate as a bar for appointing a commission if Court finds that a commission is to be appointed. M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE Okb/-