IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.322 OF 2006. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.322 OF 2006. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.322 OF 2006. IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL SECOND APPEAL SECOND APPEAL NO.325 OF 1992 NO.325 OF 1992 NO.325 OF 1992 Chhabubai w/o Balkrishna Sutar & Anr. ..Appellant versus Panchan Ladha Savala & Ors. ..Respondents and Sunil Gajanan Kulkarni ..Applicant Mr.Atul Rajyadhakshya for Mr. Nitin Gangal for the Applicant. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 5th April, 2006 Dated : 5th April, 2006 Dated : 5th April, 2006 P.C. 1. Heard Sr. Counsel Shri Rajdhakshya as well as Shri Gangal. Both of them submitted that the original Appellants as well as the Respondents in this matter have been served with copy of present application. In fact, the appellants had also sought time to file say. However, till today nobody has filed say and opposed the application. Today also the Respondents and their Advocates are absent when called. 2. It is the case of the intervenor that the suit property is in their possession and the order that will be passed in the Second Appeal will have bearing on their rights, so in order to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and to decide the matter justly and correctly the present intervenors are allowed to be impleaded as party respondents. Accordingly, necessary amendment be carried out by the appellants within two weeks. The learned Advocate for the intervenor submitted that the Second Appeal is more than 14 years old and as such the matter be fixed early. Hence, S.O. to 25.4.2006 for hearing (S.R.Sathe, J.)