Cf=-{^^ *^. ^. IN THE HIGH COURT OP CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (StNO.^4-^J_^2006 PETITIONER >NER . ....^-K- .^&y^aged ^S^-^ W.R. -•"c;<^^ ....-•" Naga RESPONDENTS ,6R.K. Markam,S/o. Gajru Ram Markaia, <• about 37 years, Sub Engineer, R/o. Colony, Quarter No. G-2, P.0. Nagari , District Dhamtari (C.G.) 1. 2. ^'o^ VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh,/ Through Seeretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Engineer in Chief, ^ Water Resources Department, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resources Department, Division No. 2, Rudri, District Dhamtari (C.G.) Secretary, Panchayat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, Districf Raipur (C.G.) Joint Secretary, s Panchayat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhavaa, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETTTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCEOF A WRIT IN THENATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER .^s> d^ 4. XI-HC-78 *11*1MI St»*f|tft T53'^tFITcW, WTnwis, Rfdl'yy ..^^.^^^^ sn^TT'ra^r (yii^si^ir) sn^rqirf^TRi (raTsn^Tstiiiqi s^nwflfs^w^T 28^-2006 Mr. Sunil Otwani, counsei fi Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. <iii<<fci<fl-i ii>itiTff)Wl'<R]^;i<, ^T3:rf^T3TI^?T advance copy. Heard. The petitioner's case is th^ rthepetitioner. Advocate for the State/respondents, on t he was working as Sub Engineer in the Water Resourees Department and| vide order dated 12-6-2006 (Annexure P- 1) he was sent on deputatibn t(» the Department of Panchayat & Rural Development. In compliance o<| that order, the petitioner joined in the Department of Panchayat & Rural) Development. Later on, other Engineers of the Water Resources Departmejit had challenged the said order dated 12- 6-2006 andthe same has been|quashed by this Court. Thereafter, the petitioner made a representation fo the Department of Panchayat & Rurat Development stating therein tha( he does not want to continue in the Department of Panchayat & Rural pevelopment, but his representation is not being decided. Having heard learned coun| petition, the petitioner has already Rural Development in pursuan^e of the order dated 12-6-2006 and thereafter, that order has been q petitions. That order was quashetl on the submission made by the Deputy Advocate General on behalf of th se! for the parties and having perused the joined in the Department of Panchayat & jashed qua the petitioners who fited the e State that ths State has framed a new scheme for sending the Engineefjs of Water Resources Department under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yc^jana (PMGSY) scheme. Therefore, in the circumstar|ces, as the petitioner has already joined in the Department of Panchayat & F^ural Development, the respondents while passing the order regarding PMG^Y scheme in respect of the Engineers of P.T.O. F XI-HC-78 s^ '^wwt, dxny'ld, Rciiuyy. *II*IMI awrqi^..^.•.^.^^f/..^ 200^ ^ 311^1 4;iq> (yi(^si^iT) sn^r^Tf^ira; TOT 3TR5T gilIRi ~n Soma ?R[TW^fi(T3II^T Water Resourees Department sho|jld as the petitioner belongs to Wat^ should pass appropriateorder alcjng the services of the petitioner. Til Department of Panchayat & Rura( alreadyjoined. With the directions aforesaid, Partiesare entitted for certifit |, the petition stands disposed of. ^d copy ofthis order. sbl'ilfcl'illH WRTf tf fectft tfaRCTI: ^3:[f^1T311^T also consider the case of the petitioner, r Resources Department, therefore, they with the other Engineers in respect of then, the petitioner shail continue in the Development on the post where he has Sd/ L.i Judge P.T.O.