HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.983 OF 2011 JUDGMENT: The petitioner filed WP No.5221 of 2011 feeling aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in conducting public auction of awarding of contract of loading and unloading of food-grains in the godowns. The writ petition was disposed of on 11-03-2011 directing that in case the respondents intend to entrust the work of handling and transporting of food-grains in respect of any godowns in the area, they shall be under obligation to do it by inviting tenders. 2. This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents have not implemented the order of this Court in its letter and spirit. 3. Heard Sri V. Raghu, learned counsel for the petitioner and the Sri B. Anjaneyulu, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 4. Even according to the petitioner, the respondents have invited tenders for loading and unloading of the food-grains in the godowns in the area, subsequent to the disposal of the writ petition. His grievance appears to be that the respondents did not place the proper and correct information before this Court when the writ petition is disposed of. If that were to be so, the remedy is not filing of contempt. 5. Hence, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J August 12, 2011. KTL