:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 3300 OF 1988 NO. 3300 OF 1988 NO. 3300 OF 1988 Bank of Baroda. ...Plaintiffs. V/s. M/s. Saiba Industries Pvt. Ltd. ... Defendants. Mr. V.N. Tendulkar for the Plaintiff. Ms. Zaveri i/b. R.C. Dalal for the Defendants. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 24TH 24TH 24TH NOVEMBER 2008. NOVEMBER 2008. NOVEMBER 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Mr. Tendulkar appearing for the Bank states that the Bank is unable to trace the original documents and file them in the Court. This was position on 12th November 2008. The Bank as well as their Advocates were absent on that day and that is how the Suit was placed today. Even today, nothing has been communicated as to when the Plaintiff/Bank would file the documents to prove the suit claim. 2. As a last chance, two weeks time is granted. If the documents are filed, then, further directions with regard to recording of evidence would be issued. Needless to state that if documents are not filed within two weeks from today, the Suit to stand dismissed for want of prosecution without any further reference to the Court. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)