^-•-•'•."yl ./'.---''"S .!.7-'-' y- ^" <SI F S! u.^--':t4^'^^"' '?"^rAS^V'^y""" c.?/'^^^ -^^ v* p^.; Q'Ci'- U^ \-0-7^^ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILSPUR PETITIONER : Wntpetition FSlNo ^3 /aegB-X^5 Vishnu Singh, aged about 42 years, son of Late Umed Singh, Working as - Mechanical Helper, Working under Superintending Engineer, E SE M, P.W.D., Bilaspur (CG) Versus ...a...... RESPONDENTS /? (1) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretaiy i"?^!.-,- ''"%••. ^?^-^. "^fc.. f'f'/-^ "'• ' •S'- ?'..!-;; "w-. s" .-•ff^'^"''"1^. ^•??' Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. ^ 2] Superintending Engineer (E&M), Public Works Department, Bilaspur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. H!GH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BlLASPUR WRiT PETtTION (S) N0.603 OF 2010 PETtTION'ER Vishnu Singh Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J, Present:- Shri Ratnesh Kumar Agrawai, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panei Lawver for the State. ^s ORDER CORAL) (Passed on this 4sn day of Aprii, 2011) Learned counsei aDDearing forthe Detitioner, on instructions, seeks Dermission of this Court to withdraw this oetition with iibertv to fi!e a petition on the ground that the subsequent cause of action hss anssn. No obiection from otherside. It is ordered, as pravsd for. AccordinQlv. the writ oetition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above-stated observation. | Sd/. Satish K. Agnihotri ! Judge | rtrur.