IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-36009 of 2009 Date of Decision: January 28, 2010 Surjit Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - None for the petitioner. Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) The prayer made in this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 427 Cr.P.C. is for issuing direction to the respondents that sentence awarded to the petitioner in six (challan) cases be directed to run concurrently. Learned counsel for the respondent- State has drawn the attention of the Court towards a judgment rendered by Full Bench of this Court in Jang Singh vs. State of Punjab, 2008(1) Crl. Misc. No. M- of 2008 [2] RCR (Criminal) 323 to say that directions to make sentences to run concurrently can be exercised by the Trial Court or by the Appellate Court or a Revisional Court at the time of exercising appellate or revisional jurisdiction. It is not open for a person to seek such direction for making sentences to run concurrently by moving an application under Section 482 or 427 Cr.P.C. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an application under Section 427 Cr.P.C. before the appropriate Court as per the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in Jang Singh’s case (supra). (AJAI LAMBA) January 28, 2010 JUDGE avin