WP(C) 5722/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. GB Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Ms. B Bhuyan, learned Standing Counsel, PWD, appearing on behalf of the respondents. The petitioner claims that the respondents are liable to pay a sum of Rs . 5,62,523/-, for the work, which the petitioner had done on the basis of allotm ent of contract by the respondents. In this regard, the petitioner has also plac ed, on record, a letter, dated 07-04-2009, issued by respondent No. 4, namely, E xecutive Engineer, PWD, Karimganj Rural Road Division, Karimganj, whereby the re spondent No.4 has denied his responsibility in the matter by saying that the pet itioner’s claim for payment is lying with respondent No. 3, namely, Superintendi ng Engineer, PWD (Roads), Cachar Circle, Silchar. In view of the above, it is hereby directed that the petitioner may subm it a representation to the respondent No. 2, namely, Chief Engineer, PWD (Roads) , Guwahati, seeking issuance of a certificate in acknowledgement of petitioner’s dues, if any. If the petitioner makes any such representation, the Chief Engine er, PWD (Roads), Guwahati, shall examine the same and pass appropriate order(s) thereon and communicate, in writing, his decision, in the matter, to the petitio ner. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision, which may be taken by th e Chief Engineer, PWD (Roads), Guwahati, or by the order(s), which may be passed , the petitioner shall remain at liberty to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition shall sta nd disposed of.