1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Second Appeal No.182 of 2009. Pundlik Harishchandra Sagane. Vs. Kusum Balkrishna Mahalle & one another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri A. S. Chandurkar, Advocate for the appellant. Coram : A.H. Joshi, J. Dated : 09th June, 2009. 1. Heard learned Advocate Shri A. S. Chandurkar for appellant and perused the Judgments. 2. Admittedly, :- (a) The mother and father of the plaintiffs have died prior to the date of suit. (b) The suit property is self acquired property of the father of the parties. (c) There is no testamentary succession by applying any rule of law as to inheritance and succession of sons and daughters share equally. 2 3. The decree, granting 1/3rd share to each child of the deceased, is thus, seen to have been passed in accordance with law. 4. It is seen that any substantial question of law or any question capable of debated even on facts is not involved. 5 The appeal has no merit or substantial question of law involved and is dismissed. JUDGE /Muley/