AB 142/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Mr. S.S. Sharma, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mrs. L. Sharma , learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. P.P. Assam. It is stated that there is a counter FIR filed by the present petitioners agains t the Principal, informant in the present case, in which allegation of molestati on of a girl student in his office chamber has been made. The present accused pe titioners being the guardian of the said victim girl protested the Principal’s m ischief. The informant Principal has filed the present FIR to cover up his misde ed. It is also submitted by Mr. Sharma that the Police, after investigation, has submitted charge-sheet, against the Principal which indicates that there is sub stance in the FIR lodged by the present petitioners against the Principal concer ned. I have perused the C.D. as produced by Mr. Gogoi, learned Addl. P.P. in connect ion with Lakhipur P.S. Case No. 382/2010 converted to G.R. Case No. 4531/2010 u/ s. 143/447/448/294/384/506 IPC. I find no such material against the present acc used petitioners warranting rejection of the bail application. Considering the aforesaid position, I direct that in the event of arrest of the accused petitioners namely, (1) Madhumati Devi, (2) Romabati Singh and (3) W. Ba santa Singha in connection with the above case shall be released on bail of Rs. 15,000/- each with one local surety of the like amount subject to satisfaction o f the arresting authority. However, they shall make themselves available before the I.O. concerned within 10 days from today for recording their statements in a ccordance with law.