v IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR me.) w.P. (S) No. 33%? (2008 PETITIONER ‘/Mathew George, S/O Late Shri L. George, aged about 45 years, R/o Omnagar, Jarhabhatha, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS T t RESPONDENTs e, ”a“ :1. , State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawarn Raipur (C.G.) . OV/ ‘{ o€ bl'°“ The Commissioner Public $€ g/Q p55? Instructions, Pension Bada, .“ Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) ‘0 o‘ / " 3. District Education Officer, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (C.G.) KT 4. Principal, Government Multipurpose Higher Secondary School, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. ' Sandeep Govind Chopde, s./o Late Shri G.S. Chopde, aged about 44 years, R/o Main Road New Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) N WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. x PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER :- As detailed in above cause title. 7 w X \ Mm H§GH SOUR? OF CHHATTI$GH AT §§LASPUR (Hm. Mr. Jasfice Pmmka’ Biwaker) Wi'i‘é’ PefitEan ($) No. 324? 0f 2W3 {fakgvgg Shri Prateek Sharma, counsel for the petftioner. Ku. Sunita Jain PL for the respondents/State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22$ OF THE CONSTiTUTlON OF !NDEA o R o E R (09.07.2009) finatty. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the matter ie heard Qhatlenge in the instant petition is to the order dated 16.6.2008 (Annexure PaQ passed by respondent Not whereby the petitioner was ransferred from Govt Muittpurpose Higher Secondary Schoot, Biiaspur to Govt. Higher Secondary Schooi, Lakhram, Biook Bethe, Distt. Bitaspur in vioiation of the transfer policy. This petition was tited on 24.6.2GO8 and the stay was granted in favour of the petittoner vide order dated 03.07.2008. Contention of the counsel for the parties is that this Court may quash the impugned transfer order by gtvtng tiberty to the respondents to pass fresh order if administrattve exigency so warrants. in View of the submissions of the oounset for the respective parties and iooking to the fact that the petition was ftiect on 24.6.2088 and stay was granted in favour of the petitioner vide order dated 03.07.2008, the impugned order dated 16.6.2008 so far as it retates to the petitioner is hereby quashed. However, the respondents shat! be free to pass the order afresh it administrative exigency neoessitates the same. With the aforesaid observation, the petitton stands disposed of. Sd/— . g Pritinker Dlwakerj judge "7% PEWTEQNER Mathew George VERSUS RESPGNDENTS