[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL W.P.NO.2560 OF 2008 Mr.Tushar Tukaram Khetal ..Petitioner Vs. Special Executive Magistrate Bandra Division and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.K.S.Patil Adv.with Mr.Yogesh Sankpal advocate for Petitioner Ms.A.A.Mane A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : DECEMBER 8, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 8, 2008 DATE : DECEMBER 8, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner has challenged the show cause notice dated 4.11.2008 issued against him under Section 111 of Cr.P.C. by respondent no.1 i.e. Special Executive Magistrate Bandra Division, Mumbai. Only show cause notice is issued against the petitioner, hence, I am not inclined to interfere as it would be open to the petitioner to reply to the said show cause notice. It would also be open to him to examine witnesses or produce any [-2-] documents if necessary. After considering the same, if the learned Special Executive Magistrate is of the opinion that it is necessary to call upon the petitioner to furnish interim bond or final bond, then in that event, four days time be given to the petitioner to comply with the terms of the bond. 3. Petition is disposed of with above directions. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]