IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 16624 of 2010 Date of decision: 03.03.2011 Sandeep Taneja ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Ashutosh Hoshiarpuri, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana for the respondent - State Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for respondent No. 4 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of directions to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondent No. 4, who is illegally harassing and threatening the petitioner. At the stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a criminal complaint for registration of the FIR against respondent No. 4 or to avail of any other remedy under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C as advised. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 03.03.2011 mohan