IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.7414 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.12.2009 Dharam Pal .....Petitioner versus Gurdeep Kaur .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Anil Chawla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Manish Prabhakar, Advocate, for the caveator-respondent. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed by the tenant against the order dated 9.12.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Amritsar. The respondent-landlord is on caveat. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I am of the considered view that the order passed by the Rent Controller, Amritsar, is absolutely in consonance with the order dated 25.11.2009 passed by this Court in Civil Revision No.6882 of 2009, and warrants no interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Dismissed. C.R. No.7414 of 2009 (O&M) 2 At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the witnesses to be produced, namely, Harbaksh Singh Bedi and Arvinder Singh, Draftsman, are apprehending danger to their life in the event of coming to the Court complex to depose in favour of the petitioner. If that is so, both these witnesses shall be at liberty to approach the Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar, who shall provide them adequate security to come forward and depose in the Court. 15-12-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE