IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4815 of 2010 Suresh Prasad SON OF LATE RAJA RAM SINHA RESIDENT OF KURTHAUL, P.S. PARSA BAZAR, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. ---------------------------------- 3 10/08/2011 Stand of the Opposite Party in the present matter is that whatever was payable to the petitioner has been paid to him. Since there is no concept of retirement benefit by way of pension available to the employees of the Corporation, there is no occasion to grant him any benefit on this head. So far as contributory provident fund is concerned, as the petitioner stood dismissed from service in the year 1983 there was no contribution from either side and the claim made by the petitioner on this score seems to be misplaced. A clear and fair stand has been taken on behalf of the opposite party that so far as the benefit of group insurance is concerned, the authorities have already taken steps with the concerned Insurance Company and that matter will be expedited. Payment on account of some of the other heads which have been talked about in - 2 - paragraph 6 to the reply to the show cause will also be looked into by the Corporation and if they are found legitimate, they shall also be taken care of by the opposite party. This contempt application is disposed of with a direction upon the opposite party that they will reconcile all the issues left over within a reasonable time frame. No case for further proceeding in contempt is made out. This contempt application stands disposed of. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)