1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.10657 of 2011 K.Subramanian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Karur District, Karur. 2.The District Environmental Engineer, Tamilnadu Pollution Control Board, Karur. 3.M/s.Valluvar Quilt, represented by its Proprietor, 9/D7, 50 feet Road, Ramakrishnapuram, Karur. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent herein to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 30.06.2011 within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner ... Mr.R.Vijayakumar For Respondents ... Mr.M.Govindan, Special Govt. Pleader for R1 and R2 R3 - Dispensed with. * * * * * ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent herein to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 30.06.2011 within a time frame fixed by this Court. 2. Heard Mr.R.Vijayakumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader who takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. In view of the order that is going to be passed, notice to the third respondent is dispensed with. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The petitioner is the resident in the same premises as that of the third respondent. He complains noise pollution and vibration and has given a representation on 30.06.2011 to the respondents 1 and 2. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. The writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 30.06.2011 on its own merits. 6. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submits that the third party can be directed to be heard while considering the representation of the petitioner. 7. In view of the above, without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 30.06.2011 on its own merit and in accordance with law and dispose of the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after hearing the third respondent or any person who may be affected by the nature of the relief sought for by the petitioner to avoid the allegations of violation of principles of natural justice. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned is free to deal with the matter on its own merit as per law. 8. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S) To: 1. The District Collector, Karur District, Karur. 2. The District Environmental Engineer, Tamilnadu Pollution Control Board, Karur. + 1 cc to Mr.R.Vijayakumar, Advocate, SR No.32198 + 1 cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR No.32398 W.P.(MD)No.10657 of 2011 20.09.2011 rsb RJ/26.9.11 2p/5c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/