1 W.P.No.6311/11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6311 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Mr.B.R.Kedar, advocate for the petitioners. Mr.S.D.Ghayal, advocate for Respondent CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J. Date : 13.12.2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The present Respondent is the original plaintiff. The Respondent has filed a suit for injunction. The Respondent also filed an application for temporary injunction. The said application came to be allowed. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed appeal before the District Court. The District Court dismissed the appeal. The Defendant has assailed the said order in the present Writ Petition. 3. The suit is filed in the year 2009. The pleadings are complete. It would not be appropriate to observe anything on merits of the matter at this stage. On 24.8.2011, I had passed an 2 W.P.No.6311/11 order that parties to maintain statusquo in respect of possession. The Respondent in his affidavit also has contended that the suit be expedited. It would be in fitness of things to continue the order of statusquo till the disposal of the suit and direct the trial court to dispose of the suit expeditiously instead of observing anything on merits. 4. In light of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of with directions to the parties to maintain statusquo in respect of possession till the disposal of the suit. The trial Court shall decide the suit as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of nine (9) months from today. However, there shall be no order as to costs. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.13.12.2011. asp/office/wp6311.11 3 W.P.No.6311/11