CRM-M No.19496 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M No.19496 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.03.2011 Sandeep ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. A.S. Sullar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana for the State. Mr. Satish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the complainant. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). This is an application seeking regular bail in case FIR No.312 dated 31.7.2009 under Sections 302/109/120-B/34 IPC and Sections 25/54/59 of the Arms Act, P.S. City Gohana, District Sonepat. Record reveals that petitioner is not named in the FIR. Co- accused Surinder @ Nanha has suffered disclosure statement that he has murdered Anoop Saini on payment of Rs.1,20,000/- from the present CRM-M No.19496 of 2010 2 accused – petitioner. Learned counsel for the complainant states that petitioner – accused has taken JCB machine on hire basis from the deceased with malafide intention not to return the same. He got Anoop Saini eliminated through the other accused. Therefore, present petitioner is the main conspirator. Learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, has opposed the bail application stating that trial is going on. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioner that so called disclosure statement of the co-accused is not admissible, I direct that petitioner be released on bail during the trial to the satisfaction of the trial Court. However, any observation made hereinabove is solely for the purpose of deciding the bail application and shall not be taken into consideration while deciding the trial on merits. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 23.03.2011 sk.