THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No. 32125 of 2011 ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking for issuance of writ of mandamus, declaring the Proceedings in Rc.No.23/2008/E dated 28.11.2011, issued by the 4th respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unwarranted, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the Government Orders, and consequently set aside the same. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents-Corporation. The facts which are not in dispute are: The petitioner joined the respondent-corporation on 01.01.1987 as Non-Technical Work Inspector in Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam District. Later, on 14.08.2008, he was transferred to Chodavaram, and again on 18.06.2009, he was transferred to Gajuwaka. Again on 25.06.2009, he was transferred to Aruku Valley as I/c AE/MIC. Later, on 01.02.2010, he was posted as Mandal Incharge at Peddabayalu, and again on 25.06.2010, he was posted to his original post, Non-Technical Work Inspector, Paderu. Again, on 07.01.2011, he was posted to Peddabayalu. Again, on 13.01.2011, he was posted as Mandal Incharge, Devarapally. Now, on 28.11.2011, he was transferred to Paderu as Non-Technical Work Inspector vide the impugned proceedings. Being aggrieved by frequent transfers, within a short span of time, the petitioner filed this writ petition challenging the impugned proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is subjected to frequent transfers within a short span of time, and that his wife is working as Field Assistant in Senior Civil Judge Court in Chodavaram, and that she is not keeping good health, and that he has two daughters to look after. The counsel further submits that due to frequent transfers, the petitioner is unable to attend to his wife’s medical requirements and that even as per the Government’s policy when both husband and wife are working in the Government, their case can be considered for posting at the same station. Generally, this Court does not interfere with the transfer orders. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is at liberty to make a representation to the appropriate authority/Superintending Engineer in the respondent-corporation, forthwith, explaining the facts of the case and raising the grounds mentioned in this writ petition. The respondent-corporation is directed to consider the same, in accordance with law, expeditiously. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________________ JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH 16th December, 2011 Note: CC in two days KSM