IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9808 of 2010 1. SATYENDRA YADAV 2. Shankar Yadav Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 25.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. One of the non-bailable offences for snatching of money from the box finds no corroboration. For abuse in name of caste, it is said that earlier a case was filed against the brother of the informant for the offence under Sections 307 and 313 of the I.P.C., as sister of the informant was operated having no skill. Further, submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that earlier to the instant case, Complaint Case No. 443 of 2010 was filed in which offence under Section 3 (I)(x) of the S.C./S.T. (prevention of atrocities) Act was not believed and petitioners were allowed bail just thereafter, this case is lodged. There could be no occasion to purchase anything from the informant’s shop though is to be considered but in regular side as anticipatory bail is barred. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioners is rejected. However, petitioners are directed to 2 surrender in connection with Gaya S.C./S.T. P.S. Case No. 15 of 2009 in the Court of C.J.M., Gaya and pray for regular bail which shall be considered on the same day without being prejudiced by the rejection order. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)