IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6413 of 2010 1. BANARAS YADAV, S/o Late Karu Yadav, R/o Village – Mahuli, P.S. – Ariari, District – Sheikhpura. 2. Kapil Chouhan, S/o Late Ram Sharan Chowhan, R/o Village – Lalu Bigha, P.S. – Ariari, District – Sheikhpura .......... Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ............. Opposite Party 3/ 24.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and State. Petitioners are named accused in this case, carry allegation of abducting husband of the informant while he was on way to his village. The petitioners and one co-named accused intercepted the vehicle and abducted him. The victim is still traceless, though, as submitted, Police has submitted charge sheet under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code even without recovery of any dead body. There are witnesses supporting as eye witness the factum of abduction of the victim. Further, it appears that the petitioners claim to have entered into a compromise with the informant, but such sort of compromise and filing petition without recovery of and joining the victim, I fail to appreciate. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, at this stage, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Prayer is rejected. Simultaneously, court below is directed to proceed expeditiously with the trial. Praful (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)