IN THE HI&H COURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE (C.) N0. ^^'S /2011 PETCTIONER .^L.-'^^"1'/ '^~ \<sr^ 1. RESPONDENTS -'lf ^T^ €»ft- ''•<'L'-' .'. '.' U. C. Dewangan, son of Jagannath Dewangah, retired Upper Division Clerk, R/o. Pahadipara, Gudiyari, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (c.e.). VERSUS Dr. R. K. Sonwane Deputy Director, Veter'inary Medical Ser'vices, Rajanqndgaon (.C.G.). Joint Director, Veten'nary Medical Services, Raipur Division, Raipur (C.G.), e-~ ? CONTEMPT PETETION UNDER ARTCCLE 215 OF CONSTETUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTEON 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1973. ^ ^ /y^. .¥ M 5 '••aas'-'*"-® ,, -g^ "^hiM^, yfll-^ie, rs)(ni-Hy,< ..^.•....(^.^..^^hi •CT^ZOO T sf^y 'vt K;-<i+ W SV^SS Stllill sil^i''pffi' (1iclf3sf^tl) ICTWdfttlCT^I SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Moha 03-08-2011 Shri R.S. Patei, counsel for tt| This contempt petition has| disobedience of order dated 1 4/6/2Q Learnea counsei ror tne pet| regularization of the period from 20i either by the Jolnt Director or by th^ no period has been prescribed for c| the petitioner is required to be deq one year nas lapsea. From the documents whlch after tne oraer was passed by thi; the Joint Director, Accounts, Tres petitioner, the same shall be made necessary entries in respect of tn psssed appropriate order and forwa Treasuryand Pension, but no orderi Even though no time iimit h ^iif^I<n41^ T7TI:T?ff ^? ts^ <I^t'(^T( ii'sifimsn^i 1 Shrivastava, J. ie Demioner. been fiied by the petitioner aiieging wilifui 10 passed in W.P.(S') No. 2398/05. tioner submitted that the order with regara to '5/92 to 12/3/96, so far, have not been passed Deputy Director. He submits that even though smpliance of the order of ihe Court, the case of ided within a reasonable time and more than nave been placed on record, lt appears tnat > Court, various steos have been taken. On 24/1/2011 (Annexure C/3), the Depi|ity Director informed the Coiiector that in case, isurv and Pension decides the case of the a basis for making payments to the petitioner. The Joint Director, Accounts, Treasjury and Pension, Raipur vide his memo dated 25/1/2011 required the Deputy Dir^ctor, veterinary to send the service book with e period from 20/5/92 to 12/3/96. Learned counsei for the petitioner submiis ti|iat the Dsputy Director therefore, shouid have rded the matter to the Jojnt Director, Accounis s nave passecs. as been fixed, the respondents are under an obiigation to compty with the order cjf the Court, as eariy as possibie. From various documents which have been anne^ed along with the petition, it is revealed that ^ 1;-?i §A i XI-HC—78 *<I*<MI shTfras 3^-<<|<1|<'|A|, ®fll^-)^fcj^|y^< -^&:...&S.^l'v±l.^ll'1 3n^5T TT?^? ('i^td'i'^i) 3ii^ii^ift;mff wiTsn^RraCTw %ta!<iH yi^ff ^I^ — °?• Ueepit various steps have been taken tow one reason or the other, the cas< dated 25/1/2011 of the Joint Dire Director, Veterinary is required order as directed by this CQurt in the basis of the materiai which is have taken certain steps towards inclined to issue notice at this stag' in case, the Deputy Directo months from the date of receipt iiberty to revive this petition. The the Deputy Director, Veterinary fori The petition is finaliy dispo^ '^rafwft'T •TORR-^ feiet-(fw?R ^aflwsD^l ?brds comDiiance of the order of me Court but fo nas remainea penaing. in view or tne mem itrtor, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Depu take appropnate steps and pass necessa ^spect of the period from 20/05/92 to 12/3/96 o jvallabie before it. Mowever, as tne responaen jcompliance of the order of the Court, 1 am nc does not pass any order within a period of tw copy of this order, the petitioner woyid be jpetitioner shail piace a copy of this order befor Idue comeiiance. ledoff. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^