.i' „!' e i? iifc: ""•"^. 1 '^v'-s^! 'i ^\y.fi f // A-;, /^S"y '••p •Petitloner IQH& ISQARH: BiLASPUi Writ Pstition (Sl No. S79 of20< Nand Lal Patel, S/o. Shri Damrudhar Patel, aged about 51 yeare, Upper Divi-sion Teacher Govemment High School Sonbarsa, Biock Kharsia, District Raigam (CG). Respsndenis ) State of Chhattis.garh, through Secretary; School Eduoation Departmeni, D.K.S. Bha'A'an, Raipur ?CG). 2) Assistant Commissioner, TriDai VVelfaFe Department, Raigarh {CG). 3) Btock Educatton Officer, Kharsia, District Raigarh (CG). (Writ Petition under Artioie 226 ofthe Constiiution of India) Shri V.K. Tekam, counsel for the peiitionsr. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State. {Passed on 1Sffi Fsbruary, Ths petitioner v.'as initiaily appointed on 10^-1975 asAssistantTeacherson a fixed pay scaie of Rs. 100/- for one year and thereafter Rs.150/- for second year on probation for a period of two years. After oompletion of probation, the petitioner was granted regular pay scale of Rs.169-300/- on 10-10-1977 2) The question of law involved herein asto whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initiat appointment or from the date of completion of probaiion period. 3) Learned counsei appering for the petitioner as wel! as for the State/respondents Jointiy submit that the facts and question of iav,' Involved in the petition are the same to that of Writ Petition (S) No.5976 of 2006 (Sushii Tiwari S othsrs Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others], •ivhlch was ailowsd vider order dated s ^^ssg^ !^' W%swssa> 's g ''sBia^ I '. ^^..^ ^. ''y"-.^-' 11-2006. Learned counsel further submit that this petition may be dteposed of in the same terms. 4) in vtew of the above-stated submission made by learned counssl appearing for the parties, the vi/rit petition is aitov/ed in the same terms i.e., the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scaie with effect from the initial date of appointmert. - Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge