eia s e v^o~V'3A...^.""-T'" p.i!,.»iti.....-"--^'@xlffil..- Fr&'-Tie4^^......"-----" S^f-.tL^."""""'"" '' .' (Sstee. IN THE HIGH COURT QF JUDICATUREAT BILASPUR fC.G) W.P.No. /200^ , /,^J-g^ PETITIONER Ratan Kumar NagekS/o Late Shri Lodho Ram Nage. R/o Village & P.0. Tetla, Tah. & Dist.Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS ^ 1. The Sate of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. (C.G.) 2. State of Madhya Prasdesh Through - Secretary School Education Department, Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal (M.P.) RESPONDENTS \-\.^^^s^. ^^'^ -j^jg 3. Collector Raigarh .<° ^\^' y ^ \..^' ^T^' •ovv (Chhattisgarh) 4. District Education Officer, Raigarh (C.G.) 5. Unionoflndia Through - Director, personnel training, public grievance & Pension ( State Reorganisation Cell) Ldknayak Bhavan, Khan Market New Dehli. WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The above named petitioner most humble and respectfully begs to submit as under : XI-HC-22 "yg •^ii-Micl'M, ^fll'yi®,(»i<ii^ll'(. W1CTI ShMK* ^..:S.:.^^...s.i_/ &w(f 'M 311^1 ^t IN^sit^ 5t)^lctl ^l?fl «[r p^^7 .^ '^ IS.1-20Q6 ^mployee serving in theState. Learned counsel for thepetitioner cjategorically stated that inthis case.the death of sii^r ^giw.^ifer Petifioner by Shri Dhaniram Patel, ^dvocate. Shri Vivek Sharma, Panel Lawyer, f<( Heard. This ease relates to compassionat^ (he employee.hgs oocurred on or after 1-1 |n batch ofcases fcaringW.P.No. 1322/20 ()assed bythis Coyrt on 20/1 2/2005. He pn -1997 and not earlier. It is further submitted that 32 involving the same question ordere have been iys that similar orders may be passed in this case felso. Learned counsel for the State does rfot dispute the above fact and state that the State t>f ChhattisQarh has taken a decisibn tct ^•mployees who died on or after 1/11/1997 jhat time. In view of the submissions made ^ithout expressing any opinion on the merit jj-istjce'wili be served if a direction is given jioncerned to consider and decide the casj [jirevalent at the time of.death of the empl( ^ppointment orders will be issued as earlyl 4ny grievance still remains, the petitioner i|icluding filing ofthe petition beforethisCoi With theaforesaid obsefvations, this Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counsel, who w r^spondents Tor compliance. cbi^ifl-] tfFraf •?'it^ 'rf^RCTC ^siPan 3ii^i r the State. appointment consequent upon thedeath ofan -ponsider the oases of dependants of those itrictly in accsordance with the policy prevalent at by learned counsel appearing for the parties, softheoase, intheopinionofthisCourt, endsof to the State of Chtiattisgarh and the authorities of the petitioner in accordance with the polioy ^yee concerned. Ifthe petitionerfound eligible, |as possible on or before 30th April, 2006. The dietitioner is also directed to render due eo-o|3eratjon to the authorities. It is made otear t.hat if may avail the remedy availabte under thelaw rt. petitionstands disposed of. 1 be obliged to communioate the order to the Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ;^f^