IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.23320 of 2009 Between: Mohd. Abdul Gani, S/o. Abdul Kareem ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary to the Government Industries and Commerce Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, A.P. 2. Director of Mines and Geology, BRKR Bhavan, 8th floor, Tank Bud Road, Hyderabad, A.P. 3. The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District, A.P. 4. The District Collector, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.23320 OF 2009 ORDER: Heard the counsel. 2. The matter is coming up for admission. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology had taken notice on 30.10.2009 and requested time to get instructions. 4. This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus questioning inaction on the part of respondent Nos.3 and 4 in considering and passing appropriate orders in pursuance of the representation dated 19.10.2009 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India. 5. It is stated that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Ac.3.21 guntas and Ac.0.28 guntas in Survey No.637 and 636 respectively situated at Begumpet Village, Kamanpoor Mandal, Karimnagar District. 6. It is also stated that the Revenue Divisional Officer after inspection submitted a letter/proceedings in RC.No.B/515/2009, dated 16.08.2009. 7. The proceedings of respondent No.4, dated 18.09.2009 in proceedings No.448/Q3/99 had also been referred to. 8. The main grievance of the petitioner is that though representation had been made on 19.10.2009 to respondent Nos.3 and 4, yet the same had not been disposed of. 9. In the light of the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the considered opinion that the writ petition be disposed of directing respondent No.3 to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 19.10.2009 along with the objections, if any, raised by the stone crushers in this regard in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 10. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ P.S.NARAYANA, J November 03, 2009 MD