1707caw1438.09.odt 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CAW NO. 1438/09 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1274 OF 1992 (D) Mah. State Handloom Corpn. Ltd. & another vs. Krishna Kamble & others Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri AN Ansari, Adv. h/f Smt. Bharti Dangre, Advocate for the applicants/petitioners. Coram : R.C. Chavan, J. Dated : 17th July, 2009 By this application, the applicants point out that in the title part of the judgment, appearance of Advocate is wrongly shown as Shri C. S. Kaptan, Advocate for the petitioners and none for the respondents. But, in fact, in paragraph No. 6 of the judgment it has been specifically mentioned that Advocate Mrs. Bharti Dangre was heard for the petitioners and Advocate Shri S. S. Meshram was heard for the respondents-workmen. It is also pointed out by the Registry that in the title part of the judgment the date on which judgment was reserved is shown as 29/4/2009 and it ought to be 06/5/2009. It seems to be a typographical errors. The application is, therefore, allowed. Necessary corrections be carried out in the 1707caw1438.09.odt 2/2 title part of the judgment showing appearance of Counsel and the date of reserving the judgment on page No. 5. If any, certified copies have been issued, the Registry to ensure that corrected copies are also issued to the parties. If the judgment has been referred to the law reporters, necessary amendments be furnished to them. So also the judgment uploaded on the web- site should be corrected. Application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE wwl