IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16642 of 2010 REYAJUL HAQUE S/O Salim Mian, R/O Vill. Dumarigarh, P.S. Manjhi, Distt. Saran at Chapra ........Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR........Opp. Party ----------- 3. 02.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 29.01.2010 in a case registered under Section 364 A of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the victim was taken away by the petitioner and one Supan Mian on pretext of leaving the victim in the school but after two days the victim was taken to the police station by the mother-in-law of the co-accused Supan Mian. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that due to previous enmity the petitioner has been involved in the present case and the petitioner has absolutely no criminal antecedent and the independent witnesses have not said anything with regard to the demand of ransom, which was admittedly not paid, hence at best case is made out under Section 363 I.P.C.. It is submitted by learned counsel for the State that the victim was taken to the police station by the mother-in-law of the victim and no ransom has been paid. Considering the fact that victim was taken to the police station by mother-in-law of co-accused, no ransom has been paid and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named be released on bail in connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No. 2 113 of 2008 on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra. It is made clear that learned Chief Judicial Magistrate will not accept the bail-bond, if he finds the petitioner is involved in a case apart from the present one and will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner, if petitioner gets involved in any serious offence in future. Praveen ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)