IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2007 / 14TH POUSHA 1928 Bail Appl..No. 7744 of 2006() ----------------------------- CRIME NO. 80/06 OF PERUMPADAPPU POLICE STATION PETITIONERS ---------------- 1. NIZAR, S/O. SIDHI, PADINJAREPURAKKAL HOUSE, PALAPETTY. 2. HAMZA, S/O. KUNJU, CHAHIL HOUSE, PALAPETTY. 3. SIRAJUDHEEN, AGED 19 YEARS, S/O. SITHUMUHAMMED, MARAKARATH HOUSE, PALAPETTY. 4. SHAMSADH, AGED 21 YEARS, S/O. SHAMSU, KUNNATHU HOUSE, PALAPETTY. 5. ISAHAQUE, S/O. KHALID, ALIMINAKATH HOUSE, PALAPETTY. BY ADV. SRI.K.J.SAJI ISAAC RESPONDENTS: ------------- SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUMPADAPPU, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR P.N. SUKUMARAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------- Bail Application No. 7744 of 2006 ------------------------------- Dated, 4th January, 2007 O R D E R Petitioners who are accused Nos. 3 to 7 in Crime No. 80/06 of Perumpadappu Police Station for offences punishable under Secs. 143, 147, 148, 324 and 308 read with Sec. 149 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. The occurrence took place on 3-5-2006 in which the de facto complainant was attacked with swords and other weapons by eight persons and he sustained not less than seven incised injuries. 4. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate concerned and files an application for regular bail within 10 days from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same date on which it is filed. With the above observation this application is dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. ani