COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Aggal No.260£2008 JUSTICE STICE D.R. SUNIL DESHMUKH SINHA & B.: HON’BLE HRI JU HON’BLE SHRI HIGH WRIT COURT APPEAL [APPEAL UNDER TO DIVISION SECTION BENCIJI 2 OF CHHATTISGARH RULES, 1988 Sum] Kummj Sinha, HIGH D S J APPELLANT 47 Smash ycars, Kumar Mishra, aged about Pmsad Mishra, son resident of Shxi of Sankatha CREDA Bhagalpur, District ce, Jashpur, Palace Dishict Chowk, Jashpur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS T The State ugh the of Chhatu‘sgarh, Director, (CREDA), Ene Chhatu'sgarh Development State Renewable Agency (C11) Raipur, District Raipur 2 The Executive Engineer, Sarguja CREDA, (on) Ambikapur, District 3 Palace Assistant Chowk, Engineer, Bhagalpur, CREDA, Jashpur, Disnict Jashpur (C.G.) Wn't Appeal No.260/2008 AppeH-Suresh Kumar Mishra has med this appeal aainst the ortler dated 23.10.2008 assed in W.P.(S) No.4800/2008, Whemy, the said Writ Ptition, clenging the omer o Inter-district transfer, was died by he learned Single Judge. Learned counsel for the appellant could not point out at either e order of transfer was malahde or it was passed o extraneous considerations or there was violation of any statory rule or Act governing the service of the appellan The learne Single Judge has categorically ecorded a nuding that an inter- dish'ict transfr was persible in the matter of the appellant and such order cot be interfered on the ground that the appellant being a Class-IV employee, his inter-dishict kansfer was not possible as is pressed by learned counsel for the appellant. we do not nn any Ieason to interfere with the olde passed by the learned Single Judge. The appeal is not wth adssion and the same is dismissed at the motion stage itself. Accordingly, LA. No.01 for of nnt g p b e hal f smigs t th th n ut t. d r e mis ann , d r or mi disposed of; r ¥ Sd/— #w Sun“ Kumar Sinha Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Judge