IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1560 of 2009 Between: M. Srinivas S/o. Janardhan R/o. 2-23, Sadhashiva Nagar Village & Mandal, Nizamabad Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionarate Cyberabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Assistant Commissioner of Police Alwal, Ranga Reddy Dist. 3 The Station House Officer Pet Basheerabad Police Station Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dist. 4 Sri Prabhakar Reddy Asst. Commissioner of Police Alwal, Ranga Reddy Dist. 5 Sri Srinivas Reddy Circle Inspector of Police Pet Basheerabad Police Station Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.RAMCHANDER GOUD The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue Order, Direction or a Writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in calling the petitioner to the Police Station to settle out the pending civil disputes with reference to the land to an extent of Ac.12-18 gts. spread in Sy.Nos.378, 379, 381, 382 and 384 of Gundla Pochampally Village, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and making him to sit hours together in the Police Station and threatening that they would be registering the cases against him one after the other as being illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to call the petitioner to the Police Station under the garb of investigation with a further direction to the 1st respondent to transfer the crimes registered against the petitioner and others to any other Police Station / Sub Division of Cyberabad or Ranga Reddy Dist.” Sri V.Ramchander Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the writ petition in terms of letter, dated 10.06.2009 filed by him in the Registry. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.1979 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 12th June, 2009. kvni