€12) mm wizoo WW(W) mmm ¥ mmwém ammm PETITIONER RE3PONDENT8 ’1. The State o Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, its ribale Welfare 2. High Level Director, 4, Raipur. 3. Sccmtaxy, Raipur. 4. Superintendent of Felice, Bilaspur. 22. 1.2009 1 Mr. Parag Kotacha, lemncdt Mr.YS Thakur, learned Dy A The petiu‘oner, by the insta} exure P/ 10, whereby he has been directed by the Superintendent of olice, Bilaspur to get his permanent caste certihcate ven'hed h‘om res ondent No.2 and in the alternative, quash the letter of Annexure P/3 issued by respondent No.2 direcn‘ng the petitioner to produce docnme ts enumerated in the said letter. He 360 OF 2009- r Arya, aged about 28 yams, S/o R/o Indcrsen Nagar, 27 Kholi, Deparmient, DKS te Scrutiny Committee, through its Deendayal Upadhyay Nagar, Sector ome Deparunent, DKS Bhawan, ‘ Writ Petition under Article 22 Ifdia and 227 of - the Constitution of ‘ 8.3 Hon’ble 8hr! Dhirendra Mi g, J :ounsel $r the pe1itioner. G for the State. 1t petition, has prayed for quashing ‘ of the condiu'on in the memo of a s - I WWW mamma- mmwxwm‘ 9, $aifaqa1‘fw documents/evidence to establish No.2 was further directed to deci Within a period of two weeks t i petiu'oner. It was also dimcted th: the prospects of appointment of Mr. Pamg Kotecha, learn submits that directiOn of the permanent caste certincate duty and contrary to the settled law Court in this regard. He further z passed any order in respect certihcate of the petitioner despit‘ has already moved contempt pew No.2 for willful violau'on of the Court’s direction. s r Wm E200 mm0513aw) mmm [espondejlts No. 3 8r. 4 to ailow the Inspector as per select list This is the thjxd round of 1i au‘on. Tho petitioner’s Writ Petition (c) No.3956/2008, for the similar lief, was allowed by this Court vide order dated 24th September, 2O 8. The order dated 16.7.2008 was quashed and the matter was reinitted to the Sub Divisional 0$oer (Revehue), Bilaspur for mash cons with law. His subsequent Writ disposed of by this ‘Court vide on submission of the parties. The pe‘ respondent No.2 on 23fd December, 2008 along with necessary . his social status, and respondent ie the‘social status of the petitioner rom the date of appearance of the at no step shall be taken to husnate ‘e petitioner; counsel appealing for the petitioner uperintendent of Police to get his erihed by respondent No.2 is illegal laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme argues that respondent No.2 has not of verihcation of permanent caste a express direction by this Court. He ion against the ofdcers of respondent In L these has also prayed for dimction to pet'nioner to join on the post of S ideration and decision in accordance Detition (s) No. 6712/ 2008 was also ler dated 19.12.2008 on the basis of itioner was directed to appear before _-\V Xi-HC—78 dimcted to allow the petitioner to join on the post of Sub Inspecto on the basis of selection list, until vermcau‘on of his caste cex Lilicate. From perusal of therorders passed by this Court in earlier two writ peiitions at the instance of petitioner, it is manifestly clear that his hrst pen'tion was allowed and the matter was remitted to the Sub Divisional omcer (Revenue) circumstances, the respondents matter, between the same paru'es, or substantially similar relief, is not imaintainable. Accordingly, the etition' being not maintainable is ‘ hereby dismissed at the admissio stage itself. hesh consideration and decision on his application for permanent aste certincate (Annexure P/ 1), His subsequent petih'on was also disp sed of on, the basis of submission of the parties and respondent No.2 as directed to take decision in the matter of verincation of permane t caste certihcate submitted by the petitioner Within a stipulated peri Since earlier writ petition fo idenh'cal relief has been disposed of by this Court on merits, the i petition on the same subject- t Sd/L ‘ " i A .Dhir‘endra MishraL i i Judge L c e r o . n