c-^ z-y?^~ •^WtsLE IN THE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTCSGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETCTION No. f 0 6 5<gt< of 2010 PETCTCONERS ;1. KU. PADAMA KASHYAP .p/f'/ //Jsf / ^%y ^;M^ ^' ^ ^Xf .V <? w': vr' 'S' >.-• ^ d/o shri Laxaman Kashyap aged about 10 years, caste muriya r/o viliage Arandawal, Baganpa! Lohandiguda PanchayatJ post Gadiya, Lohandiguda Jagadalpur Kistnct Baster [C.G:, [visuaiiy impaired] d/o shri Laxaman Kashyap aged about 8 years, caste muriya r/o viliage Arandawal, Baganpal Lohandiguda Panchayat, post fiadiya, Tahsil Lohandiguda Jagadalpur the petitioners no.l and no.2 fiied their petition through the s/o aged about 36 ^ I'r-jil-'" in^'";IS::?i;- rs.;£!i^sWf!'£!-f^~?:assi'-svSsSs^3!;aw^iyS0WS c? RESPONDENTS: caste muriya r/o village Arandawal, Baganpal Lohandiguda Panchayat, post 6adiya, Tahsil Lohandiguda Jagadalpur bistrict Baster [C.G.) Versus 1. ^ The State of Chhattisgarh, ih: - The Secretary, Panchayat and Social welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner Jagadalpur, Baster Division Baster, DistrictBaster [C.6.) ,/^^ssr6. //. '*-'" ^- ^~ -~%p / N'^)> 3. The Director, Panchayat and Social welfare, State of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 4. TheS office of the the •nIIL . : r^.u u! v <nw( ^li: • a -4 ^ hearing impairment students school and hostel Dharampura - 1 Jagadalpur, District Baster [C.G.] WRIT PETCTCON UNDER ARTCCLE 226 OF THE CONSTCTUTCON OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTCORARI .PROHABITAION, etc. AN& / OR FOR ORDER ANt5 / OR DIECTTON / DIRECTIONS INNATURE OF WRIT. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (Ct N0.6S84 OF 2010 Petitioners Ku. Padama Kashyap & Another Versus Respondents TheState of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PET1TION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Vijay K. Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panet Lawyer forthe State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 06th day of December, 2010) Learned counset appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioner No.1 & 2 both 10 to 8 years old children, are visually impaired. Their father Shri Laxaman teshyap made an apptication to the several authorities i.e. the Secretary, Panchayat & Sociat Welfare Department, the Commissioner, Jagdalpur, the Director, Panchayat & Social Wetfare andthe Superintendent, Government Visually Impaired & Hearing Impairment Students School, Jagdalpur, for admission of his children, but no step has been taken titl date. Shri Deshmukh, further submits that the Govemment has evolved a policy for grant of admission to physicallychallenged persons including visuaily impaired. Leamedcounset next submtts that it is unfortunate that the father of petitioner No.1 & 2 are running from pitlar to post without any assistance when they have acquired right under the poltoy of the Govemment. ^ Be that as it may, if no action has been taken on the application, it appears that the officers are teast careful about the problem of the petitioners. Shri Shridhar, ieamed counsel appearing for the State submits that if the application is pending consideration, the same shall be decided as early as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks. In view of submission made by the learned eounsel appearing for the State respondents, nothing remains for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, the vwit petltion is disposed of.l-fowever; the respondents are directed to examine the application of the petitioners, in accordance with law and pass an appropriate order wlthin a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thisorder. ^ ^ 1 Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok i