_^i-^-~.- ^: /^' ,^"^ ..^?-s-e & t& ,sil %>*<(^ ^ ~?5ET •<fiw^, ^ft^TS, fN?TRTy NINWT (Rtn<*» 311^1'f^; (1clt3<(<^) i^iiw wsa siroi (Sinqle BenchU-lon'ble Mr. Writ Petition Fs (Petition under Art.226 PETITIONER : B.P. Bhan 44 year Panchaya' v' jaf Constitution of India) |waj, Son of Shri P.R. Bhardwaj, aged about i, Presently Posted as C.E.O. Janpad Masturi, &istrict Bilaspur (C.6.). irsus RESPON&ENTS 1. State of and Rural Mantralaycj 2. Shri J.R. Panchayat C[ihattisgarh, Through; Secretary, Panchayat l&evelopment Department, [5.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C6) |Bhagat, Chief Executive Officer Janpad ^Aalkharoda, District Janjgir Champa (C.6.). 21.01.2009 Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Mr. Arun Sao, 6ovt. Heard. This petition is directed order dated 6.7.2007 (Annexure] is working as C.E.O. and posted af Bilaspur, has been transferred t( District Janjgir-Champa on admin| Mr. Sao, learned Soverrjment submits that by virtue of interir^i Court, the impugned transfer <^i;lisy?^N *fwi<iT ^ ts1cst <i^)^i< ^siRman^i Justice Dhirendra Mishra) No.4285/2007 Advoc4te for the petitioner. Advocctte for the State. against the impugned transfer P-1) whereby the petitioner, who Janpad Panchayat Masturi, bist. Janpand Panchayat Malkharoda, strative ground. Advocate for the State order dated 25.07.2007 of this could not be given effect to orfcler ?^^Nt<T^"i!<^f y<«t-il^!l':<—FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. 6 F ^'SS^ % ^ '• ..'.'^.^•y^^S:^ [;i ,3-»- 'fJ f' ^. ^.f K ''%. r.ssS'S'-1' a»*i(q» '?°E[ «L||^|(»|^•^ft^Fi'g', fq'?irey ^s^.....^^...... T- sii^i 'T?^ (1pf3^?) ^<nw:^i^tf 'w'iii-l'B-i *lli|ril' 4 is'et <lai<»;it ^siftnsn^t even after lapse of more tharj circumstances, the transfer orcl redundant and meaningless witl^ submits that he has no objection^ order impugned is set aside wi| appropriate orders in the matt^r under the administrative exigenc^. In view of above submissioifi the instant petition is allowed an|J Annexure P-1 dated 6.07.20071 petitioner, is hereby set aside. liberty to pass appropriate ordei^s petitioner in the event of adminis| Certified copy as per rules.| one & half year and in these er of Annexure P-1 has become the lapse of time. He further if the petition is allowed and the rh liberty to the State to pass of transfer of the petitioner of learned counsel for the State, the impugned transfer order of so far as it r-elates to the However, the State shall be at with regard to transfer of the rative exigency. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge