/' , C4’téb7 w. P. (c1 No. 63% (2009 PETITIONER / Radheshyam Dhurve, S/o Shri Purru, aged about 6O years, R/o Village—Gorakhpur-Kala, Janpad Panchayat, Sahaspur—Lohara, ' District—Kabirdhaln (C.G.) VERSUS \ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WRITX. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 227 OF THE IN THE HON’BLE’HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR RESPONDENTS : / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through — The Secretary, . WO Department of Panchayat, "dry “fags’ J1? 96’?» D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (c.G.) ma x / 2. The Collector, Kawardha Distt. u Kabirdham (C.G.) /« 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Kawardha, \ Distt.— Kabirdham (C.G.) ,w 4. Nayab Tahsildar, Sahaspur Lohara, Distt.-Kabirdham (C.G.) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.6379 OF 2009 PETITIONER Radheshyam Dhurve Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench :‘ Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :— Shri Basant Dewangan, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed oncthis 22nd day of November, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that with the passage of time the petition has become infructuous, to which learned counsel appearing for the State has “‘Gowri r; no objection. 2. ln view ‘of foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed as having become ii‘ifructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge