CRM-M- No. 6350 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- No. 6350 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : March 15, 2011 Rajiv Kumar ..... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present : Mr. J.S. Cooner, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. **** Alok Singh, J (Oral) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.521 dated 16.12.2010, under Sections 420/406 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station City Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has refunded ` 40,000/- to Shiksha Devi, one of the complainant and is ready to refund ` 10,000/- to Shiksha Devi through Investigation Officer. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that he has spent ` 20,000/- on the admission of Sandeep and shall refund ` 30,000/- to Sandeep through the CRM-M- No. 6350 of 2011 (O&M) 2 Investigating Officer. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that petitioner shall refund ` 50,000/- to Yash Kumar through the Investigating Officer. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation and shall participate in the investigation as and when he is required by the Investigating Officer. Sub-Inspector Kanwar Singh, Investigating Officer is present in person. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana, on instructions from Kanwar Singh, has stated that petitioner has not refunded a single penny to Shiksha Devi and has not spent any money for the admission of Sandeep. Present petition is disposed of with a direction that petitioner shall surrender before the Investigating Officer on 25.3.2011 alongwith the money as undertook by the learned counsel for the petitioner, he shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer subject to the conditions provided under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, it is clarified that if petitioner does not join the investigation and fails to comply with the undertaking as furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioner, Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to move this Court for cancellation of his bail. (Alok Singh) Judge March 15, 2011 Anand