IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6861 of 2008 Date of decision: 01.04.2009 Savitri Devi .............Petitioner Vs. Jagjiwan Pal Singh ............Respondent Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Khetarpal, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. N. JINDAL 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- A.N. JINDAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not press the revision petition as having become infructuous. 2. Revision petition is dismissed being infructuous with liberty to file an application, if it is not found infructuous. (A.N. JINDAL) JUDGE April 01, 2009 Pankaj*