IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13900 of 2009 1. UMESH SINGH S/O HARI HAR SINGH VILL.- BHEL DURMRA, P.O.- BADHKA DUMRA, P.S.- MUFFASHIL, DISTT.- BHOJPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR INDIGNEOUS MEDICINE DISECTORATE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (HOMEO) INDIGENOUS MEDICINE DIRECTORATE, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE REGISTRAR-CUM-PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER GOVERNMENT AYURVEDIC & UNANI MEDICINE COUNCIL, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 3/ 29/03/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 17.9.2007 cancelling his registration for practice as a ‘Vaidya’ based on an Ayurveda Ratna qualification from the Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Prayag, at Allahabad obtained in the year-1988 for which registration was granted to him in 1990. The impugned order states that Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Prayag at Allahabad had recognition in the subject concerned only till 1967. In view of the issue having been settled finally by the judgement of the Supreme Court reported in (2010) 12 SCC 609 (RAJASTHAN PRADESH VAIDYA SAMITI SARDARSHAHAR AND ANOTHER Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS) holding in no uncertain terms at paragraph-51 that persons 2 obtaining the said qualification after 1967 when the institution no more had recognition were not eligible to practice merely because their name was included in the State register, there remains no issue for adjudication by the Court. The application is dismissed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)