SSK/ 1 WP/2313.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2313 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7940 OF 2011 Suvarna Bhujgonda Patil ....Petitioner Versus Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Rahul Walvekar i/b. Mr. Vikrant Makhare, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R. M. Patne, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 4. Mr. S. M. Kamble, Advocate for respondent nos. 5 to 15. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 20th OCTOBER, 2011. P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The civil application is taken out for restoration of the above said writ petition. The writ petition was dismissed in default by an order dated 10th October, 2011 as nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was called out. The petitioner has given reasons for his absence in Paragraph No.4 as to why she or her lawyer was not present on that day. I find the reasons to be satisfactory. In these circumstances, the writ petition is restored to the file. The civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). (RANJIT MORE, J.)