1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . Criminal Application No. 368 of 2009 Rajkumar s/o Ganeshlal Kuhikar VS. Shri Punamkumar Vasnik and another ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.G. Karmarkar, Advocate for applicant, Mr. S.Z. Sonbhadre, Advocate for non-applicant 1, Mr. V.A. Thakre, A.P.P. for non-applicant 2. Coram : A.H. JOSHI, J. Date : 25th March, 2010. 1. This appeal against acquittal of non- applicants. 2. The complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act has been rejected on two grounds namely; (i) That the transaction of sale of tyres, sale bill etc. are not brought on record to prove the transaction. (ii) Existence of civil liability is not proved. (iii) Fact of dishonour of cheque being disputed fact, was required to be proved by the complainant, which has not been done. 3. These grounds of acquittal reflected in the Judgment are not shown to be contrary 2 to record or vitiated being perverse. 4. In the result, appeal does not warrant any interference. Hence, application is rejected of. Judge |adgokar|