WP(C) 3405/2008 MCBEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B K SHARMA Heard Mr. S S S Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R Chak raborty, learned State Counsel, Assam. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to regularise his services as Muster Roll Worker. He was appointed as such on 01.01.1993. As per policy decision of the Government, the services of the Muster Roll Workers prior to 01.04.1993 were to be regularised. However, th e Full Bench decision of this Court in Jitendra Kalita & Ors. Vs. State of Assam & Ors. reported in 2006(2) GLT 654(FB) has held that the said policy decision i s not a valid one. While not interfering with the services of those Muster Roll Workers who were already regularised, the Full Bench also observed that no furth er direction for regularisation of services of the Muster Roll Workers can be is sued. Pursuant to the aforesaid judgment, the Government of Assam has issued further g uideline providing continuation of Muster Roll Workers appointed after 01.04.199 3. It is submitted that another policy decision is under contemplation to regula rise such Muster Roll Workers. In view of the above, while not issuing any direction to regularise the services of the petitioner, it is hereby provided that in the event of any subsequent gu idelines/policy decision, the respondent may consider the case of the petitioner .