v!: Civ.'l CASE7NO. ~T of2011 '>.3°i{a 'SsiW^Sf ^iff^'Sis'^'S'. .^^ f'* K.N.Tiwari, aged about 50 years, S/o late Shri C.L.Tiwari, Fisheries .*»^t >-- *^"£'-—-^^ inspector, Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari '$$?^f" ^L O^' ^~"v .VERSUS RESPONDENT/ Shri S.K.Sahu, Assistant Fisheries Officer, Incharge Assistant Director, Fisheries Dhamtari (C.G.) CONSTITUTION OF !NDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 of ./-/ "f *11*«rllaiW«»» TEET -^WW^, ritilwiri, r««ni'y'i< a^-^.^l^0^^! "WI. 2b0 sn^r •vfK ('yf^'^) an^i w Ki-< wnsn^iwtiw ^wrer :(fe sn^ii Wfepfr'l WBaf ^ fB^ft TCTE^R ^-Slffftl 3T!^I SB : Hon'bie Shri ivlanindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. Q1.09-2011 Shri D:N.Prajapati, counsei i]orthe petitioner. Heara. Learned counsel ror the petil a writ petition challenaina the ordei interim order was passed on 14/0i the piacement of the petitioner as; tioner submits that the petitioner had rilec of transfer dated 21/06/2011 wherein, ar f/2011 directin.q status quo, in respect o' it obtalned on that dav, io be maintainec till the next date of hearinci. Learned counsei for the pet interim order was passed, the pei been wronalv relieved from the iioner submits that the date on which the litioner was on medical leave out he has loffice and vide letter dated 20/7/2011 (Annexure C/5), It has been comlnunicated to him that as he as aireadv been relieved on 28/6/2011 , his jo| aiiowed. In his submission, thisl interim order passed bythis Coun ni.na submitted on 19/07/2011 cannot be amounts to wiiifui disobedience or t.he flirectin.q status quo to be maintalned. hrom tne pieadin.qs and c#3cuments vi/hich have been piaced on record, it is found that the petition^r was not on dutv on 19/07/2011 and he iaims to be on medicai leave (Annexure C/5) shows that the pet that around, petitioner's ioining ; aGceDted. In that view of the matter, whereas the letter dated 20/07/2011 tioner was relieved on 28/067201 1 and on tubmitted on 19/07/2011 has not been B am not inclined to issue notice to the resoondent. The Detition is finallv dlsDosed off. + •<- -+ XI-HC—78 t<i*i^r a»*iich s r -<<i<ii<n'4, ®fl1-H'i<s,[iidK-iy —.....^i-....^...©..^.-^.^/// "•^, 200 SiI^T 'T5RT (1':<fd«f<ll) aii^i ^1'fefRr wn sii^i'ai'qw WITWTlfCTW^T '.? The petitioner hovvever, application, if so advised, berore by him. twould ise at libertv to move appropriate the 'Writ Court for such directions as prayed ^Fiferatt •WTa't 4 ft'st tfa^n ^siRrcian^i Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge f