ladda IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No.2911 of 2009 Union of India through General Manager, C.Rly. and Anr. ..Petitioners. vs. Nandu Krishna Wani ..Respondent. Mr T.J. Pandian, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr Sandeep V.Marne, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM: D.K. DESHMUKH AND K.K.TATED,JJ DATED: 4TH NOVEMBER,2009 P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Perused the record. It is clear that so far as charge no.1 is concerned there was doctor s certificate on record which shows that the respondent was unwell and therefore in our opinion no fault can be found with the finding recorded by the Central Administrative Tribunal that charge no.1 is not proved. So far as charge no.2 is concerned, charge was that duty memo produced by the respondent was a fake because that duty memo though shows that it is signed by Shri Narkhede, it is not actually signed by him. The Tribunal has observed that without examining Shri Narkhede as a witness this charge cannot be held to have been proved. We see that no other view can be taken than the view taken by the Tribunal. In this view of the matter, the petition has no substance. It is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. (D.K. DESHMUKH,J) (K.K.TATED,J)