IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.3271 of 2009 Date of Decision: September 16, 2010 Rajesh Sharma .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Gurminder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing chargesheet dated 15.5.2002 (Annexure P-1) and consequential proceedings. 2. The petitioner, it seems, was serving as Tehsildar. Without going into the details, it needs mention that vide Annexure P-1, chargesheet was issued. By virtue of order, Annexure P-4, regular enquiry has been ordered CWP No.3271 of 2009 [2] against the petitioner. 3. At this stage while judgment is being dictated, learned counsel contends that let the petition be dismissed as withdrawn to enable the petitioner to take all the defences/ grounds available to him before enquiry officer in regular enquiry. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 5. In view of the delay already caused, the respondents are directed to conclude the enquiry proceedings, preferably within six months of receipt of a certified copy of this order. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not cause any delay in the proceedings. 6. It goes without saying that the petitioner would be supplied all the documents in accordance with rights of the petitioner under the rules. (AJAI LAMBA) September 16, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?