IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-27951 of 2009 Date of decision: 4.12.2009. Neelam Kumari and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr.Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Arshwinder Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. S. D. ANAND, J. In this case interim anticipatory bail had been granted to the petitioners herein vide order dated 7.10.2009. The learned State Counsel opposes the continuation of interim order by pointing out that petitioners did not cooperate in the matter of recovery of articles. Learned counsel for the petitioners points out that no articleis to be recovered. It is apparent from the file that the FIR had been lodged by the mother against her own daughter and son-in-law. She had earlier executed a registered will dated 14.6.2004 (Annexure P-2) in favour of the petitioner No.1. There is a precise averment, in the course thereof, that her son Nand Lal is not under her control, that he is a liquor addict and maltreats her. There also was a precise averment that the petitioner Neelam Kumari lives with her and looks after her. It was at a subsequent point of time that dispute arose between the petitioner Neelam Kumari and her brother and she, in company with a sibling, filed a suit (Annexure P-3) against her brother and also her mother-first informant. In the circumstances of the case, the interim order dated 7.10.2009 is made aboslute. Disposed of accordingly. December 04, 2009 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE