IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15909 of 2011 UMESH PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Brahmpura P.S. Case No. 136 of 2001 registered under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Two persons were apprehended by the police on information given by the hotel management since room was booked by the fictitious persons. The apprehended accused persons named this petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is submitted that petitioner was named in the F.I.R. Since the case was instituted in 2001. There is nothing on record to suggest that the petitioner has not booked the room. This Court is not inclined to interfere. Let the learned court below 2 consider the regular bail application of the petitioner and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day keeping in mind that the petitioner was not apprehended from the place of occurrence if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned J.M. Ist Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Brahmpura P.S. Case No. 136 of 2001. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)