1 ARBAP151.07 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 151 OF 2007 M/s. Narmada Macadam Pvt. Ltd. ... Applicants Vs 1. Union of India & anr. ... Respondents Mr. Toni S. Sachdevani i/b V.J. Takalkar for the Applicants. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 15TH JULY, 2010. P.C. : 1. This is an application under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for appointment of an Arbitrator. 2. There is no dispute that a contract was entered into between the parties, which contains an arbitration clause. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant makes a statement that the 2 ARBAP151.07 Applicant will restrict its claims in the application to twenty per cent of the contract value. The statement is accepted. In view of the statement, the application is liable to be allowed. 3. In the circumstances, the Arbitration Application is allowed as prayed for. However, the Applicant will restrict its entire claim to twenty per cent of the contract value. The reference shall be in accordance with clause 64 of the General Conditions of Contract. Parties shall proceed accordingly, including that the General Manager, Western Railway shall appoint the arbitral tribunal within eight weeks from today. 4. The Arbitration Application is, accordingly, disposed of.