IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 7553 of 2009 Between: 1 Prahlada Rao, S/o P.Seetha Rama Rao, R/o Maldakal Village, Mahabubnagar Dist. 2 Syed Shajuddin Tebrej, S/o Syed Shaabuddin, R/o Bheem Nagar, Gadwal. 3 U.Satyanna, S/o Uppari Ranga Swamy, R/o Peddapally, Mahabubnagar Dist. 4 Manikyamma, W/o U.Sathyanna, R/o Peddapally, Mahabubnagar Dist. 5 Padma, W/o Prahlada Rao, R/o Maldakal Village, Mahabubnagar Dist. 6 Ranga Adinarayana, S/o R.Maddileti, R/o Aize Village, Mahabubnagar Dist. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of A.P., Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 2 Kuruva Pedda Narsimulu, S/o Chinna Thimmanna, Maldakal Post, Mahabubnagar Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto quash the proceedings in Cr.No.84 of 2009 on the file of the P.S., Maldakal, Mahabubnagar Dist. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.PRASAD, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER PSR, J. Crl.P.No. 7553 of 2009 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. Though the second respondent is served, none appears. Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a Xerox of the acknowledgement showing the service on the second respondent. It is made part of the record. 3. The order dated:17.09.2009 is in favour of petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 However, considering the circumstances, it is directed that all the petitioners shall not be arrested till filing of the charge sheet if any. However, the investigation into the case and consequential proceedings based on the result of the investigation shall go on. 4. Accordingly, the petition s disposed of. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. Dated:27—01—2010. *BVS