SSK/907 1 WP.9293.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9293 OF 2010 Cane Agro Energy India Limited ....Petitioner Versus The Union of India & Anr. ...Respondents Ms.Neeta Gokhale i/b. H. P. Vyas for the petitioner. Mr. Madhav Jamdar i/b. Jaydeep Deo for respondent no.1 CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & RANJIT MORE, JJ. DATED : 3RD MARCH, 2011. P.C.: Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the representation dated 15th October, 2010 addressed by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent which is annexed at Exh. “B” to the petition has not been considered by the 2nd respondent. Learned counsel for the 2nd respondent states that the said representation has not been received by the 2nd respondent. In our opinion, it is not necessary to go into this disputed question because learned counsel for the 2nd respondent has made a statement that the said representation will be considered by the 2nd respondent independently and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from today. We accept this statement. The 2nd respondent shall dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 15th October, 2010 which is annexed to the petition at SSK/907 2 WP.9293.10 Exh. B independently and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from today and communicate result thereof to the petitioner. 3. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 4. The petition is disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.) (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)