IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10415 of 2010 M/S BHARGO SAW MILL,KHAGAUL &ANOTHER Versus THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & OR ----------- For the petitioners: Mr. Suraj Samdarshi,Advocate For Central Bank of India: Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh,Advocate ---- 2. 9.7.2010 The petitioners had earlier approached this Court for refund of excess amount of interest, which has been charged by the respondent Central Bank of India claiming that the same had been calculated wrongly by filing C.W.J.C.Nos.11525 of 2008 and 11667 of 2008, which were disposed of by order dated 5.2.2009 holding that the writ petitions cannot be entertained for such a relief and that too after such a long period but liberty was given to the petitioners to make a detailed representation in this regard to the respondent Bank, which was to consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law and communicate the same to the petitioners. It is evident that the Bank has considered the representation of the petitioners and passed orders in this regard and communicated the same to the petitioners by its letter dated 29.12.2009 (Annexure-2). In the above circumstances, the claim of - 2 - excess amount of interest charged cannot be entertained in this second writ petition, which is essentially for the same relief, as had been sought in the earlier writ applications which were not entertained by this Court and no liberty was granted to the petitioners to re-agitate the matter after passing of the orders by the Bank. The writ application, being not maintainable, is accordingly dismissed. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )