IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.3578 of 1990 Date of decision : 19.11.2010 Shingara Singh Aulakh and others … Petitioners Versus The State of Punjab and others …Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri Present: Ms.Maninder, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms.Shikha Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ritu Bahri, J. The petitioners had filed the petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for a direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to grant salary for the period since December, 1989. During the pendency of the writ petition, an affidavit was filed by Sh.H.M.Chopra, Secretary, Punjab State Social Welfare Advisory Board, Chandigarh. As per this affidavit dated 30.10.1990, the petitioners had been given the payment of salary upto March, 1990. In view of this, the writ petition has become infructuous. Today learned counsel for the petitioner states that contents of the affidavit are correct. In view of the affidavit, this writ petition has become infructuous and disposed of as such. (Ritu Bahri) Judge 19.11.2010 sd