IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.28112 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 19, 2012 Vijay Kaushik ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.K.S.Nalwa, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana, for the State. Mr.P.K.Ganga, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The negotiations in this case having failed finally, the couple has again separated. On 22.12.2011, this court had given time to the counsel for the petitioner to have instructions in case he is ready to part with the custody of the children to the mother- complainant. Counsel for the petitioner contends that exams are to take place in the month of March, 2012 and till then present arrangement should be continued. Otherwise, the petitioner is on anticipatory bail for over a period of one year. No case for sending him in custody, therefore, is made out. The order dated 23.9.2010 is made absolute. The petitioner would be at liberty to approach the trial Court for regular bail once the challan is presented. The trial Court would consider the grant of regular bail in the light of order passed by this Court. Criminal Misc.-M No.28112 of 2011 (O&M) : 2 : The parties are left open to make approach to the Guardian Court to seek the custody of the children. It is only the Guardian Court, which would be in a competent position to decide about the custody of the children keeping in view their welfare on the basis of material that may be placed before the said Court by the respective parties. The petition is accordingly disposed of. January 19, 2012 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE