IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 13TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 22ND KARTHIKA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3566 of 2009() ------------------------------ CRA.233/2006 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT,-I, MAVELIKKARA CC.1148/2005 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, MAVELIKKARA .................... REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:- ----------------------------------------------------- SAJI GEORGE, S/O.GEORGE, JESSY VILLA, OLAKETTIYAMBALAM, MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR. B.RENJITHKUMAR RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE:- ----------------------------------- 1. GRACY KUNJUKUTTY, WINSON VILLA, VATHIKULAM MURI, THEKKEKARA VILLAGE, OLAKETTIAMBALAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. ADV. MR. P.N. SUKUMARNA, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. ANILKUMAR.K.N.PILLAI FOR R1 THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. =============== Crl.R.P. No. 3566 of 2009 ================= Dated this the 13th day of November, 2009. ORDER The accused in C.C. No.1148 of 2005 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Mavelikara for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl. M.P. No. 11206 of 2009 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. Money, if any, deposited by the revision petitioner before the trial court pursuant to the orders, if any, passed by the superior courts shall be refunded to the revision petitioner/accused. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Dated this the 13th day of November, 2009. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv