IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTRAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 143 of 2009 Thakur Singh Rawat S/o Late Jeet Singh Rawat …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ……. Respondents Mr. M.C. Kandpal, Senior Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Kunwar N. Singh Rautela, Advocate for respondent No.4. 2. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R; and perusal of para 4 of the counter affidavit wherein it is alleged that there is eye account of the incident of three witnesses, I do not find that the petitioner is entitled to get the reliefs claimed in the writ petition. 3. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed in limine. 4. I am refraining from commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial, which is yet to start. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 02.04.2009 Shiv