1N THE HON’BL WRIT PETITIGN No. J FETITIONER SANTRAM VERMA VERMA; AGED RURAL DEVELo—PM KANKER. VERSUS SGARH AT BILASPUR SON OF SHRI SHANKAR LAL ABOUT .34 YEARS; GRAM ENT, R/ O. CHARAMA, E HIGH COURT OF CHHAT’H 935/ mow, SAHAYAK, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT AND 1) STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHHATTTSGARH, OF PANCHAYAT THROUGH .fiN’D RURAL x MANTRALAYA, RAIPUR. ,4; DEVELQPMENT, D.K.s BHAWAN, x ,, f? “ RESPONDENTS ff J" _ @j '3' ‘ V JOTNT PANCHAYAT D .K.S . BHAWAN SECRETARY, AND RURAL MANTRALAY CHHATTISGARH DEVELOPMENT, , RATRUR (CHHATTISGARH) 3) CHIEF PANCHAYAT EXECUTIVE KOILY OFFICER, BEDA, DISTT. JANPAD KANKER. 4) JOINT Ob FICER, COLECTOR DISTRICT CUM KANKER DERARTMENT (CGJ INQUIRY HE CONSTITUTION OF, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 / 227 OF T ...WEAV I I g \ W\ XI-HC—~78 2%@ , w.p.No.1995/02 ' WWW WV 20Q petitigner 13V shri Kishorea Bhaduri , Advocate . State bV Dr. N‘K. Shukla, Addl. Advocate Genaal, with Shri RS. Koshy, Govt. Advocate. Heard; This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging inter district transfer, which affects the promotional prospect of the petitioner; Learned counsel far the State suBmits that in the connected matters, on the notice being issued by this Court, State Government is considering; the modification of the order impugned. State may consider the matter afresh and pass appropriate orders. With the aforesaid obnervations, this petition is t So may file a petition afi esh (Jertitied copy as per rules. .tv’l" disposed of If the grievance of th petitioner still subsists, tie/W 5d]- Fakhruddi‘n K l Judge WIW(WEJ) WWW aarmtm mmm WM§W$¥€R $aif<mm 7 17/4f2003