THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No :2239 of 2008 DATED:12-02-2008 BETWEEN: Smt.Veera Ankalamma. ..... PETITIONER AND The Joint Collector, Machilipatnam, Krishna District & 2 others. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus declaring the orders issued by the respondents, dated 12-03-2007, 15-05-2007; and 07-01-2008, as illegal, arbitrary, and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the house bearing Dr.No.11/140-A situated at Medarabasti, Gudiwada, Krishna District in pursuance of the impugned proceedings. 3. Petitioner was allotted an extent of 50 sq.yards in Ward No.11 of Gudiwada village, Krishna District in which house bearing No.11/140-A was constructed. While so, the said house site allotted in favour of the petitioner was cancelled by the 3rd respondent-Tahsildar, Gudiwada vide proceedings in Rc.No.A1/745/06, dated 12-03-2007, holding that the house site allotted in favour of the petitioner at ward No.11 is identified as T.S.No.44 (R.S.246/1B) situated at Medarubazar, and the petitioner violated the terms and conditions of the assignment as she has been carrying on their family business of baddi kottu and the said assigned land is required for the public purpose. Aggrieved by the said order of the 3rd respondent, dated 12-03-2007, petitioner filed an appeal before the 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Gudiwada, and the 2nd respondent dismissed the appeal in Rc.No.306/07, dated 15-05- 2007. Aggrieved thereby, petitioner filed a revision before the 1st respondent-Joint Collector, Machilipatnam, and the 1st respondent by order in D.Dis.No.E5.3928/2007, dated 07-01-2008, while disposing of the revision held that the petitioner is entitled for alternative place of residence so that she will not be forced into streets after implementation of the orders and accordingly, directed the 1st respondent to provide alternative house site to the petitioner under the approved layout under ‘Indiramma programme’ and also sanction a house. The only grievance of the petitioner is that without providing alternative site she is sought to be dispossessed contrary to the orders of the 1st respondent. 4. Learned Government Pleader on obtaining instructions from the 3rd respondent-Tahsildar, Gudiwada in Rc.A1/93/2008, dated 07-92- 2008, submits that the department has no objection to accommodate the petitioner along with the beneficiaries under ‘Indiramma scheme’ within a week from the date of receipt of this order. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances 3rd respondent is directed to provide an alternative site to the petitioner in the approved lay out under ‘Indiramma scheme’ in Gudiwada along with the other beneficiaries and sanction a house as directed by the 1st respondent. Until the alternative house site is provided to the petitioner she shall not be dispossessed. 6. Accordingly, Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J 12th February, 2008. Tsy