IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 22ND MARCH 2010 / 1ST CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 9626 of 2010(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MUSTHAFA,AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.UMMAR,KARIKKAD.P.O,THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.VARGHESE.J.PUNNACHALIL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY,KADAVALLOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH,KADAVALLOOR,THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SECRETARY,KATTAKAMBAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH,KATTAKAMBAL,CHIRACKAL, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, THRISSUR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------ WP(C) No. 9626 of 2010 -------------------------- Dated, this the 22nd day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT According to the petitioner, he is the owner of the property in which building No.IV/487, numbered by the 1st respondent Panchayat is situated. Petitioner submits that actually the building is situated within the jurisdiction of the 2nd respondent and that the building has been erroneously numberred by the 1st respondent. It is stated that seeking cancellation of the number assigned by the 1st respondent, he has filed Ext.P5 before the 1st respondent. He has also filed Ext.P6 before the 2nd respondent Panchayat, within whose jurisdiction the building is situated, to number the building. It is complained that since the 1st respondent is not considering Ext.P5, the 2nd respondent is not considering Ext.P6 and that as a result of both the above, he is not in a position to execute Ext.P3 sale deed. 2. From the submissions thus made, what is required to be done is that the 1st respondent should consider Ext.P5 first, and W.P.(C).9626/10 2 depending upon the order to be passed thereon, 2nd respondent should also consider Ext.P6. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition with the following directions. (i). Within two weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, 1st respondent shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P5. (ii). If the decision of the 1st respondent is to cancel the number assigned to the building in question, on being served with a copy of the order passed by the 1st respondent, 2nd respondent shall take necessary action on Ext.P6, which shall be done within three weeks of its receipt. 3. Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment before respondents 1 and 2 for compliance, along with the copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs