THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1946 of 2011 ORDER: Respondent No.1 filed O.S.No.288 of 2009 in the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Chirala against respondent Nos.2 to 6 for partition and separate possession of the suit schedule property. The petitioner, a third party, filed I.A.No.868 of 2009 under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. with a prayer to add him as a defendant. He pleaded that he purchased part of the suit schedule property from respondent No.6 i.e. defendant No.5 in the suit. The application was opposed by respondent No.1. The trial Court dismissed the I.A. through order, dated 07.03.2011. Hence, this revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. On the notice sent to respondent No.1, it was endorsed that she left without instructions. The notice is deemed to have been served. The petitioner claims to be the purchaser of part of the suit schedule property, that , from one of the defendants. In the event of partition, his rights will be certainly affected. In a suit for partition, the purchasers of the property are not only proper, but also are necessary parties. In their absence, there cannot be effective adjudication of the dispute. Hence, the civil revision petition is allowed and the order under revision is set aside. Consequently, I.A.No.868 of 2009 is allowed and the petitioner shall stand added as defendant No.6 to the suit. He is given four weeks time from today to file written statement. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.04.07.2011. Note: Issue cc in three days. kdl