IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.822 of 2001 Between: M.Narsing rao S/o Sri M.Anthaiah H.No.5-8-91/A, Nampally, Hyd. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P., Housing Board, Rep by its VC & Housing Commissioner, Gruhakalpa, Hyd. 2 The Executive Engineer (Housing), A.P, Housing Board, South Division, M.J.Road, Hyd. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in ﬁxing the rent at Rs 1250/- per month (noe enchased to Rs 1800/- p.m.) inrespect of shop No.7 situated at APHB Complex, Brkatpura, Hyd which was alloted to the petitioner while ﬁxing the rent in respect of other (19) shops in the same complex at Rs 473/- permonth (noe enchased to Rs 710/-) as discrimantory, arbitrary & illegal & violative of Art 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to collect the rent at the rate as being collected from other tenants Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.SATYAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MRP.V.SANJEEVA RAO The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.822 of 2001 ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said statement, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 06-09-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VEENA}