1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR L.P.A.NO. 295/2008 IN W.P.NO. 5284/2007 ( The Principal, Vidarbha Ayurved . -: versus :- Late Vimal Susalram Deshpande and another ) L.P.A.NO. 296/2008 IN W.P.NO. 4387/2007 ( The Principal, Vidarbha Ayurved . -: versus :- Gangubai Kashinath Patil and another ) L.P.A.NO. 297/2008 IN W.P.NO. 4892/2007 ( The Principal, Vidarbha Ayurved . -: versus :- Smt. Indirabai Haribhau Khujnare and another ) L.P.A.NO. 298/2008 IN W.P.NO. 5283/2007 ( The Principal, Vidarbha Ayurved . -: versus :- Smt. Vatsalabai Mahadeorao Dafar and another ) L.P.A.NO. 299/2008 IN W.P.NO. 5153/2007 ( The Principal, Vidarbha Ayurved . -: versus :- Smt. Kausalyabai Pralhadrao Raghuwanshi and another ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND F.M. REIS, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 15, 2009. Shri S.V. Purohit, learned counsel for the appellant Management has placed on record affidavits and receipts of respective employees showing that they have received their dues of interest on delayed payment for gratuity. Shri Harkare, learned counsel for respective employees accepts the fact of payment. Learned A.G.P. states that Government is formal party. In the circumstances, in view of the payments made, all Letters Patent Appeals are rendered infructuous. Same are accordingly disposed of as such. Rule discharged. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd.