1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.163 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2273 OF 1996. (MOHD. RAFIQUE MOHD. HARUN Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA. & OTH...) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____ Shri N.A.Vaishnav, Advocate for Appellants. Shri T.R.Kankale, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 3. CORAM : A.P.DESHPANDE AND R.C.CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 14, 2008. 1. An order passed by learned single Judge is challenged by filing present Letters Patent Appeal. The submission of the learned Advocate in the appeal is that the land held by wife Hafizabee ought not to have been clubbed with land held by her husband Habib Haji Kachhi. It is further contended that no opportunity to choose the land to be retained by the appellant was made available. The land of the husband and wife need to be clubbed for retaining one family unit having regard to the provisions of Section 4 of the Act. Record 2 reveals that an option was given to the appellant to choose and retain the land, but the same does not appear to have been done by the appellant. 2. Perused the impugned order. No interference is called for. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed summarily. JUDGE JUDGE RR.