IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13580 of 2003 UMA PATI CHOUDHARY . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 8.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, for the State and for the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board. The petitioner was a Lecturer in the K.S.D, Sanskrit University. Consequent to the Constitution of the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, he was sent on deputation to the Board as an Examination Controller on 25.8.1981. Official formality took time to be completed when his deputation was approved as Examination Controller on 10.11.1987. The challenge to his appointment by another in C.W.J.C. No. 2238 of 1982, was dismissed. Petitioner also filed C.W.J.C. No. 6054 of 1991, for regularizing his service as Examination Controller of the Board when his services were terminated also. The matter ultimately traveled to the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 366 of 1993. The Apex Court noticed that the deputation of the petitioner was made as a competent and experienced person to conduct and control examinations by the Board. The Government of Bihar in the Department of Education in pursuance of such deputation fully authorized the petitioner on 17.9.1982, to discharge all duties and responsibilities of the Controller of Examination effective from the first day of his deputation. The University also communicated its consent for permanent absorption of the appellant. The Apex Court noticed 2 that the necessity for sending on deputation arose in public interest to meet the exigency of public service. The University, the parent department or lending authority or the Board, the borrowing authority of the appellant, the deputationist had all given their consent for deputation of the petitioner and were for permanent absorption in the establishment of the borrowing University. The Apex Court setting aside the order of termination held that he will be treated to be a permanent employee of the Board. The petitioner seeks the relief for computing his services from 25.8.1991 as an employee of the Board for computing his eligibility for time bound promotion and consequent revision of pay, pension etc. Once the Apex Court returned the findings that the petitioner was sent on deputation in the exigency of the service, the State Government approved the deputation from the original date of deputation, all parties had consented and that he was a permanent employee of the Board, full effect has to be given to the order and findings of the Apex Court. Directions are therefore issued for considering his claim for time bound promotion from 25.8.1981 and reckoning other eligible service benefits within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)