1 jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLIFCATION NO. 365 OF 2010 IN APPEAL NO. 888 OF 2009 Rahul Hanumant Bhosale ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents .... Mr. Rahul S.Kate Adv. for Applicant Mr. S.S.Pednekar APP for State .... CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : 26th MARCH, 2010 P.C.: 1 In this application, the applicant who is the original complainant in Sessions Case No.101 of 2007, has prayed that order dated 6.2.2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati in Sessions Case No. 101 of 2007 be quashed and set aside and his application dated 4.11.2009 for return of property be allowed and articles mentioned at serial nos. 1 to 28 in application dated 4.11.2009 be returned to him on such terms as this Court may deem fit and proper. 2 2 We have heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State. Admittedly, the accused have not claimed property detailed at serial no.1 to 28 in application dated 4.11.2009. Learned APP on instructions from Mr. Vilas Bhosale, Police Inspector attached to Daund Police Station states that the police have no objection if the property is returned to the applicant on his furnishing an appropriate bond. Learned counsel for the applicant states that appropriate security bond to the satisfaction of the Sessions Court Baramati will be executed by the applicant within three weeks from today. On such bond being furnished to the satisfaction of the Sessions Court, the property detailed in application dated 4.11.2009 be returned to the applicant. This order shall replace the order dated 6.2.2010 passed by the Sessions Court Baramati. 3 Application is disposed of. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]