IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14822 of 2011 SHEO NATH PRASAD @ CENTRE JI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 141 of 2003 registered under Sections 498A, 304B, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the D. P. Act. The marriage was performed in 2003. The accusations are of demand of dowry and torture. It appears that there was specific accusation against the husband, father and sister of the husband. There is no specific accusation against the petitioner as he happens to be the maternal brother of the husband. It is submitted that subsequently the accusation against the father-in-law has been found false. The case was instituted in 2003 when the petitioner was named. This Court is not inclined to interfere. On 2 perusal of the F.I.R. this Court finds that it is a fit case of grant of regular bail. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned S.D.J.M., Raxaul at Motihari in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No.141 of 2003 at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)