IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.10811 of 2009 NIRAJ PATHAK @ NIRAJ Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 15.06.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 363, 365, 302/201 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. His name has figured in the statement of one Pramod Kumar, who stated that he saw one person sitting by the side of the victim boy Saurav Kumar in a Bus. The aforesaid fact has also come in the statement of Pramod Kumar recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned counsel submits that petitioner has very good relation with the informant and he does not have any role in the abduction of his child and the informant has filed a petition to that effect before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai as contained in Annexure-3. In the circumstances, this court directs that if informant appears before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Phulwaria P.S. case no. 151 of 2008 and states that petitioner is not involved in the abduction of his son, he would be released on bail to his satisfaction. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through Fax at the cost of the petitioner. Accordingly this application is disposed of. Uday/ (S. P. Singh, J.)