1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.543 OF 2010 1.Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. & Anr. ...Petitioners vs. 1.The Pune Municipal Corpn. & ors. ...Respondents --- Mr.E.P.Bharucha, Sr.Advocate with Cyrus Bharuchas, Sachin Chandarana & Ms.Priyanka Vegal i/b. M/s.Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co., for Petitioners. Mr.S.M.Gorwadkar, for Respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr.A.M.Puranik, for Respondent nos.4 to 6. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED: 27th January,2010. P.C.:- 1. Challenges to the notices at Exhibits L , M and Q is permitted to be deleted with liberty to file a petition for that reliefs before Nagpur Bench of this Court. However, it is directed that for a period of two weeks from today, the Corporation shall 2 not take coercive measures in relation to Notices at Exhibit L , M and Q . Prayer clause (b)(v) i permitted to be deleted with liberty to prosecute such a remedy as may be available to the petitioners. 2. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. In so far as the notice at Exhibit G is concerned, in view of the law laid down by the judgment of this Court in the case Bank of Baroda Vs. 1.Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr. in Writ Petition no.9343 of 2009 decided on 17.11.2009, the notice at Exhibit G is set aside. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (A.R.JOSHI, J.)