IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31713 of 2009 1. ANIL SINGH @ ANIL SINGH YADAV 2. VIJAY SINGH @ VIJAI SINGH YADAV @ SUKHARI SINGH 3. SURENDRA SINGH @ SURENDRA SINGH YADAV 4. BALKESHWAR SINGH @ BALKESHWAR SINGH YADAV 5. RAM AWADHESH SINGH @ AWADHESH SINGH YADAV ------------------- Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.28804 of 2009 RAJESHWAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 9.11.2009 Both the applications arise out of the same P.S. case number, have been heard together. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that after filing of the case by petitioner of Cr.Misc.No. 28804 of 2009 false case is lodged by the informant that also after three days which in itself is clear that some incident had taken place and in that circumstance only this allegation is levelled, may be accepted to the extent that super-addition allegation of theft may be there but that allegation is followed by abuse in name of caste to humiliate, makes the allegation non- bailable due to its falling for offence under the provision of S.T./S.C. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. 2 However, petitioners are directed to surrender in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas in SC/ST case no. 25/09 and move for regular bail which shall be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by the rejection order. (Mandhata Singh,J.) A.I.