IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.W.P.No.1912 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:October 26, 2010 Rajiv @ Bobbi .....Petitioner v. The State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.HPS Aulakh, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.1114 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.W.P.No.1912 of 2010 The present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of direction to the respondents to release the petitioner for six weeks parole under Section 3(1)(c) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988. Heard. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that Annexure P2, on behalf of the petitioner has already been moved in this regard before respondent no.2, i.e., Superintendent, District Jail, Rohtak, on 7.10.2010 and however, no action has been taken on the same so far. Hence, in view of these facts and as per request, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider and decide the application filed on behalf of the petitioner, dated 7.10.2010, Annexure P2, already stated to have been moved before respondent no.2, as per law, Rules and Instructions on the point, within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 26.10.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge