1 dgm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2558 OF 2009 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.U.B.Nighot for the petitioner. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 03.03.2009 : 03.03.2009 : 03.03.2009 P.C. The petitioner has already filed an application raising preliminary objection to the effect that such dispute against the recovery certificate is not maintainable, in view of judgment in Kedarling Kedarling Kedarling Vikas Seva Socy.Ltd. vs. Vikas Seva Socy.Ltd. vs. Vikas Seva Socy.Ltd. vs. Dinkar Dinkar Dinkar Bhimrao Raut & ors., 2003 (1) Bhimrao Raut & ors., 2003 (1) Bhimrao Raut & ors., 2003 (1) Mh.L.J.152 Mh.L.J.152 Mh.L.J.152. It is therefore desirable that the concerned Cooperative Court, Nasik should dispose of this application as early as possible. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 2 application be directed to be disposed of by fixed date which cannot be granted as the matter is pending since 2007 including interim order and the petitioner has filed this application in 2008. In view of this, the above order is sufficient for the trial court to pass necessary order. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) V. MOHTA,J.) V. MOHTA,J.)