'BLE SHR! H.L. Office reference. Versus State of Chhattisgarh. Shri Ashish Shrivastava.Advocate appears as Amious Curiae to assist the Court. . Shri Vjnay Harit, Dy. Advocate General for the State. Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, counsel for the Municipal Corporation, Bitaspur. (Passed on 3ra April, 2007) The • following oral order of the Court was passed b'y H.L. ^ A letter was received by the learned Chief Justice of this Institution from the students of Lal Bahadur Shastri Higher Seoondary School, Bilaspur; inter alia requesting the learned Chief Justice to direct the Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, to appoint teachers to teach English and Mathematics subjects. 2) The learned Chief Justice of this Institution had thought it fit and „ registered the said letter as a Public Interest Litigation ("PIL" for short). After '•...^ii such registration, notices wereissued to the respondents. •iv^' i. 3) The Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, has come with the statement that by way of transfer, an appointment of teacheg is made to teach the Engl'ish and Mathematjcs subjects. 4) In view of the above, in our opinion,.the grievance made by the students of the sohooi in their letter dated 18-11-2002 would not suMve for consideration ofthis Court. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed ^f as having beoome unneoessary. Ordered accordingly. //'^---—""' . - Sdl- Sd/- Ouef Justice -ssra