IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.3332 of 1987 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.10.2011 P.K. Mehta, Junior Enginer (Civil), Punjab State Tubewell Corporation Ltd., Patti Lining Division No.3, New Krishan Nagar, Amritsar and others. ... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab, through the Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of Irrigation, Chandigarh and others. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:None for the petitioners. Mr. Navdeep Sukhna, DAG, Punjab, for respondents No.1. Mr. Amit Sethi, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. None for respondents No.4 to 6. ***** 1.Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? NO 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) 1 There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. The counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents points out that the 3rd petitioner has expired and the petitioners No.1 and 2 have since obtained promotion and also retired. 2. The said fact is recorded and the petition is dismissed. OCTOBER 17, 2011 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE