ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION NO.129 OF 2008 PETITION NO.129 OF 2008 PETITION NO.129 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.6857 OF 2008 PETITION NO.6857 OF 2008 PETITION NO.6857 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.V.Y.Sanglikar for the Petitioner. Mr.A.G.Toraskar for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 6th February, 2009. : 6th February, 2009. : 6th February, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties finally. 2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and as already observed and as all the matters are connected and interlinked, which are revolved around the Suit No. 511/4146 of 1966, Suit No.2094 of 1993 and Suit No.1737 of 1985, and as there is no convincing reason is made out to interfere with the order already ( 2 ) passed, and as mere filing of appeal and the delay to take steps to prosecute the same for long, itself is not bonafide, the Review Petition is dismissed. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks, the interim order granted by this Court on 17/11/2008, to continue for six weeks which I am inclined to grant. In the result, there will be no coercive steps for taking possession on the condition that the Petitioners should not create any third party rights or interest in the premises. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]