IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.19333 of 2009 Between: Netala Josphin and 3 others. … Petitioner And 1. The State of A.P., Rep. By District Collector, East Godavari District, Kakinada. 2. The Land Acquisition Officer cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Amalapuram, East Godavari District. 3. The Tahsildar, P.Gannavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. … Respondents. The Court made the following: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.19333 of 2009 ORDER: - The matter is coming up for admission. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition takes notice on behalf of Respondents 1 to 3. Heard Sri T.V.Jaggi Reddy, learned counsel representing the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition representing the respondents. This writ petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus with appropriate direction declaring the action of the respondents in not paying compensation for the Lanka lands resumed from the petitioners in Survey No.1/5 to an extent of Ac.2.50 cents of Udimudi village, P.Gannavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, for widening and raising of Vasista left flood bank, as illegal, arbitrary and pass such other orders. Several facts have been narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition and the order copy in W.P.No.13870 of 1992 also is placed before this Court. It is stated that the petitioners made a representation to the second respondent on 20.02.2009. While explaining the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the specific stand taken by the petitioner is that they are entitled to compensation for the Lanka Lands resumed in S.No.1/5 of an extent of Ac.2-50 cents of Udimudi village and the respondents are not paying the said compensation due to the petitioners. In view of the facts and circumstances, this court is of the considered opinion that the writ petition be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the second respondent within a period of two weeks in this regard and let the second respondent consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks thereof. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA 11.09.2009. Lmv