IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 22ND FEBRUARY 2011 / 3RD PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 5060 of 2011(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- REBEKAH P.JOY, AGED 3 YEARS, D/O.P.O.JOY, MINOR, REPRESENTING BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN P.O.JOY, S/O.P.A.OUSEPH, AGED 42 YEARS, PAYYAPPILLY HOUSE, ST.ANTONY'S STREET, KURIACHIRA, THRISSUR - 680006. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL OFFICER, CBSE REGIONAL OFFICE, PLOT NO.1630 A, J BLOCK, 16TH MAIN ROAD, ANNA NAGAR WEST, CHENNAI, PIN - 600 040. 2. THE PRINCIPAL, ST.PAUL'S PUBLIC SCHOOL, KURIACHIRA, THRISSUR, PIN - 680 006. BY ADV. MR. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, SC, CBSE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 5060 OF 2011 ......................................................................... Dated this the 22nd February , 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers: “i) Issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to admit Rebekah P. Joy, D/o. P.O. Joy into L.K.G. for the academic year 2011-2012 in St. Paul's Public School, Kuriachira. ii) Grant such other reliefs that this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Heard the learned Standing counsel appearing for the first respondent as well. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance projected in the writ petition with regard to the admission of the minor child has already been taken up for consideration before the first respondent by filing Ext. P5 W.P.(C) No. 5060 OF 2011 2 representation and that the petitioner would be satisfied if direction is given to the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P5. 4. After hearing both the sides, this Court does not find it necessary to issue notice to the second respondent for the time being, since the relief is confined to the above extent. 5. In the said circumstance, the first respondent is directed to consider Ext. P5 representation and pass appropriate orders on merits, after notice to the second respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk