IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 8710 of 2007 Date of Decision: 30.5.2007 M/S Ashish Trading Company, Delhi. ....... Petitioner through Shri Ashwani Talwar, Advocate. Versus Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited and another. ....... Respondents through Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER JAIN, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? .... VIJENDER JAIN, CHIEF JUSTICE The petitioner has challenged the order of resumption and the order by which its appeal against the said order has been dismissed. The petitioner, who was allotted a plot on 21.3.2001, the physical possession of which was given on 10.1.2002, was required to raise a construction within a period of two years, i.e., up to 9.3.2004 and to implement the project within a period of three years. The petitioner having failed to comply with the conditions of allotment faced the onslaught of the resumption order dated 21.11.2005 which was passed after issuing a show cause notice and affording an opportunity of personal hearing to it. C.W.P. No. 8710 of 2007 -2- .... Learned counsel for the petitioner could not show any infirmity in the order in law and only pleaded that one more opportunity be granted to the petitioner to comply with the conditions. We find ourselves unable to answer the prayer of the petitioner particularly in the existing situation as the petitioner has chosen to violate the conditions of the allotment letter. No equitable relief can be granted to it in view of the aforesaid. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed. (Vijender Jain ) Chief Justice May 30,2007 ( Mahesh Grover ) “SCM” Judge