IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 4938 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: MARCH 30, 2009 Bal Mukand .....PETITIONER Versus Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited,Panchkula and others ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL --- Present: Mr.Mani Ram Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. .. SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner was initially working as work charge T-Mate since March, 1979 to July, 1990. The petitioner was made regular on 26.7.1990 and thereafter he retired from service on 30.6.2006. It is the case of the petitioner that while calculating the pension of the petitioner, the respondents have not counted his work charge service. Counsel states that in this regard a legal notice was given to the respondents, but till date no decision has been taken thereon. In view of the above, without issuing notice to the other side as it will unnecessarily delay the matter, ,this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide the said legal notice as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months. In case respondent No.3 is not competent to decide that legal notice, he is directed to send the same to the competent authority. March 30, 2009 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE