mgn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION STAMP NO.25485 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5743 OF 2009 Sachin Vilas Kamble ..Applicant Vs. The Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Sanjay Prabhu for the Applicant Ms. Shraddha Chavan i/s. Suresh Kumar for respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 25tTH JANUARY, 2010 P.C. 1. The Review Petition is directed against the order of this Court dated 21st July, 2009 holding that the Writ Petition would not be maintainable as the reliefs sought is amenable to the jurisdiction of Central Administrative Tribunal. 2. The Review Applicant is a member of the Railway Protection Force. He had approached this Court in the matter of his transfer from Railway Protection Force to Railway Protection Special Force. 3. Under Section 2 the provisions of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 amongst others would not apply to any member of Naval, Military or Armed Force or any other Armed Force of the Union. Under the provisions of the Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 under Section 3 the Central Government was to constitute and maintain an armed force for the Union to be called Railway Protection Force. In other wards clearly, therefore, considering Section 2 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 the Administrative Tribunal would have no jurisdiction. 4. Considering the above, the Writ Petition as filed would be maintainable as the petitioner cannot be left remediless and apart from that considering Section 2 of the Administrative Tribunal Act read with Section 3 of the Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 the Administrative Tribunal has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the petition. In view of that the Review Petition is allowed. The office to place the Writ Petition for admission. Review Petition disposed off accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)