IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 11476 of 1994 Between: Ch. Raji Reddy S/o. Linga Reddy R/o. Parkal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board rep. by its Secretary, Vidyuth Soudha, Hyderabad. 2 The Divisional Engineer, Electrical (Operation) Warangal, Warangal District. 3 The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Operation, APSEB, Mulugu, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the order dt. 9.3.94 made in Proc.No. DEF/OP/WGL/ADM/D.No.465/94 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.S.RAVINDRANATH The Court made the following : That as is evident from the order of appointment dated 11-10-1993 appointing the petitioner herein as Helper itself was subject to the condition that if any of the certificates produced by him is found to be bogus or incorrect, he shall be terminated of his engagement and shall be prosecuted in the court of law. On verification, the certificate evidencing technical qualification was found to be bogus one. The Principal, Government I.T.I, Mulugu Road, Warangal by his letter dated 25-1-1994 informed the respondents herein that the writ petitioner has not undergone the course as claimed by him at his institution. It is thus clear that the petitioner gained employment in the service of the respondents on the basis of a bogus and non-existing certificate. The order of appointment itself was a conditional order, namely, that it was subject to verification of the certificates produced by the petitioner. On verification, the certificates were found to be bogus one. That verification has resulted in passing the impugned order of termination, which in my considered opinion, does not suffer from any infirmity requiring any interference by this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India. I find no merit in this writ petition and the same shall stand accordingly dismissed, but without costs. _____________________ B.Sudershan Reddy, J. grr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.Sri S.Ravindranath, standing counsel for the APSEB. 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{NR}