IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 19TH MAGHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 39 of 2011(S) ----------------------------- ( AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.20169/2010 Dated 16/07/2010) .................... PETITIONER: ------------------ 1. T.G.MURALEEDHARAN PILLAI, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.T.G.GOPALA PILLAI,'KIRANAM',MUDIYOORKONAM.P.O., PANDALAM, PRESENTLY WORKING AS JUNIOR LECTURER IN AGRICULTURE, EXTENSION TRANINIG CENTRE, ETC P.O. KOTTARAKKARA. 2. P.O.PAUL, AGED 51 YEARS,S/O.OUSEPH, PEREPPADAN HOUSE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PRESENTLY WORKING AS JUNIOR LECTURER IN AGRICULTURE, EXTENSION TRANING CENTRE, ETC.P.O., KOTTARAKKARA. 3. M.G.BABU, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O. M.V.GANGADHARAN, MANIYALIL HOUSE, KANJIRAKKADU, RAYONPURAM.P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PRESENTLY WORKING AS JUNIOR LECTURER IN AGRICULTURE, EXTENSION TRAINING CENTRE, MANNUTHY. 4. M.RENUKUMAR, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O. SANKARAN, MARAVANCHERRY HOUSE, KUNDUKADU.P.O. THRISSUR DISTRICT, PRESENTLY WORKING AS JUNIOR LECTURER IN AGRICULTURE, EXTENSION TRAINING CENTRE MANNUTHY. BY ADVS. SRI.K.I.ABDUL RASHEED SRI.K.A.SHAMSUDEEN SMT.BHAMA G. NAIR SRI.V.K.MEETHIANKUNJU SRI.N.M.SIYAD RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 2 & 3 IN WPC ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. RAJESH KUMAR SINGH (AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN) THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT(RD), LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. A.SHAJAHAN (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN) THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONERATE OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, LMS COMPOUND THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/02/2011, ALONG WITH WP(C) NO.20169/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VK ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ----------------------------------------------------------- COC.No.39 OF 2011 & IA.No.16715/2010 in WP(c).No.20169/2010 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T WP(c).No.20169/2010 was disposed of by judgment dated 16th July, 2010 directing that the claim of the petitioners for declaration of their probation as Junior Lecturer (Agriculture) shall be considered by the Government. 2. This Contempt Case is filed alleging non-compliance with the aforesaid directions. Meanwhile the respondents in the Writ petition filed I.A.No.16715/2010 in WP(c).No.20169/2010 for extension of time. 3. While the matter is pending, Government have passed order dated 14.1.2011 dealing with the claim of the petitioners for declaration of their probation and their claim has been rejected. 4. Though the counsel for the petitioners contended that this order is contrary to the directions in the judgment, I am unable to agree with this contention. This is for the reason that by the judgment, this court only directed that the claim of the petitioners for declaration of their probation shall be considered and orders thereon shall be passed. If for any reason, the order is COC.No.39/2011 & I.A.NO.16715/2010 :2 : illegal, it is for the petitioners to challenge the said order and seek appropriate reliefs. No case of contempt has been made out. Contempt is closed. 5. Now that the order has been passed, no further orders are necessary in I.A.No.16715/2010 filed for extension of time. It is made clear that it will be open to the petitioners to seek their remedies against the order dated 14.1.2011. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/