IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 11079 of 2009 Date of Decision:- 01.04.2010 Sushila Devi ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. Vikram Punia, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? M.M.Kumar, J. The instant petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking quashing of the acquisition proceedings initiated persuant to notification dated 24.12.2007 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity the Act) and declaration dated 10.07.2008 issued under Section 6 of the Act. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in pursuance of order dated 10.02.2010, the petitioner made representations for releasing of land which has been recommended to be released from acquisition. C.W.P. No. 11079 of 2009 Accordingly, the writ petition having been rendered infructuous is disposed of as such. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) JUDGE April 1, 2010 GA