IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 22ND SEPTEMBER 2008 / 31ST BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 28079 of 2008(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- J.ABDUL AZEEZ, MEDICAL RECORD LIBRARIAN GR.I, GOVERNMENT DENTAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. REMANI BAI, MEDICAL RECORD SUPERINTENDENT, SAT HOSPITAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. P.J.HELEN REENA, MEDICAL RECORD SUPERINTENDENT, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM. 5. K.C.INDIRA DEVI, MEDICAL RECORD SUPERINTENDENT, MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. D.AJAYALAL, MEDICAL RECORD SUPERINTENDENT, MEDICAL COLLEGE, ALAPPUZHA. 7. P.D.JAYA, MEDICAL RECORD SUPERINTENDENT, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOZHIKODE. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.T.MOHAMMED THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 28079 OF 2008 P = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 22nd day of September 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's claim is for a revision of the seniority list published as on 11.10.2006 and promotion as Medical Record Superintendent. According to the petitioner, his juniors have already been promoted and that if the seniority is revised as claimed by him, he is also entitled to get promotion. Now this claim of the petitioner has been taken up before the 2nd respondent as per Ext. P14 representation, I feel, at this stage the petitioner's grievance can be redressed by directing that Ext. P14 should be considered and orders passed. This, the 2nd respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say that the affected parties should be heard before any order is passed. 2. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent, for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-