1 CA911/97 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No. 911 of 1997 (Chagan Varat v. Hanumant Varat) in Review Petition St No. 7048 of 1996 in Second Appeal No. 55 of 1990 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Smt. Chhaya N. Lahare, Adv. h/v Mr. S.P. Deshmukh, Advocate for the applicant Mr. Dhananjay Deshpande, Adv for the respondent PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. This application seeking condonation of delay caused in filing review application deserves to be dismissed. 3. The applicant was appellant in Second Appeal No. 55 of 1990. On 21st June, 1990, his appeal was heard on admission and the learned Judge of this Court dismissed it on merits by passing the speaking order. It is said that the appellant was not made aware of the order soon. It is also said that the appellant was suffering from Tuberculosis and was unable to contact his Advocate etc. For many days the impugned order remained unattended. 2 CA911/97 Thereafter, the appellant thought it fit to make this application seeking review of this order. Even such an application was made after about 2000 days delay. The appellant tried to explain by saying that the appellant was suffering from Tuberculosis and was unable to contact his Advocate. By the impugned order, the appeal was dismissed on merits, and so, the appellant had an opportunity to challenge the order in appropriate Court. If this was not done within time, by making the present application, the applicant is only hoping that some other Judge would reconsider the case on merits. I am afraid, there is no such possibility. The applicant in this application should not entertain such a hope. The application is therefore dismissed. 27th June, 11 ( A.V.NIRGUDE, J. ) SRM/