PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH. *** 1. CWP No. 7675 of 2010. Date of decision: March 22, 2011. *** Ajay and others Versus State of Haryana and another. *** 2. CWP No.13166 of 2010 Date of decision: 22.3.2011 *** Renu Dahiya and others Versus State of Haryana and another. *** 3. CWP No. 9339 of 2010 Date of decision: 22.3.2011. *** Sewa Nand and others Versus State of Haryana and another. *** 4. CWP No.10500 of 2010 Date of decision: 22.3.2011. *** Smt. Manju and others Vs. State of Haryana and others. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER, J. *** Present: Shri Ravi Partap Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners in CWP Nos. 7675, 13166 & 9339 of 2010. Shri Ravi Verma, Advocate, for the petitioners in CWP No. 10500 of 2010. Shri Harish Rathee, Sr. D.A.G. Haryana. *** Mahesh Grover, J (Oral) This order of mine shall dispose of CWP Nos. 7675, 13166, 9339 and 10500 of 2010, as similar question of law and facts have been raised in all these petitions. On due consideration, it is found that the issues which have been raised in these petitions is also the subject matter of Civil Writ Petition No. 3304 of 2010 titled Chatarpal and another Versus State of Haryana and another decided by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Parmod Kohli on 24.2.2010. In the aforesaid writ petition, the claim of the petitioners therein was dismissed by observing that the selecting authority always has a right to -2- CWP No. 7675 of 2010 formulate the criteria while resorting to the process of selection. It is to be noticed that the selection impugned herein and in the said writ petition was the same. Since the matter is no longer res-integra, I am of the opinion that the instant writ petitions are to be dismissed in view of the decision rendered by this Court in CWP No. 3304 of 2010 titled Chatarpal and another Versus State of Haryana and another decided on 24.10.2010. Ordered accordingly. (MAHESH GROVER) March 22, 2011 JUDGE Malik