IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH JANUARY 2008 / 26TH POUSHA 1929 RP.No. 13 of 2008() ------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.23561/2005 Dated 21/08/2007 .................... PETITIONER : PETITIONER IN THE WPC: --------------------------------------- A.GOVINDAN, DISTRICT JUDGE (UNDER ORDERS OF DISMISSAL), SRI.SAI HOUSE, T.C.55/2215(1), SAI NAGAR, VISWAMBHARAN ROAD, PAPPANAMCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.ANIL K.NAIR SRI.V.MADHUSUDHANAN SRI.PRAMJI PAUL VAZHAPPILLY RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS IN THE WPC: ------------------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR (ADMINISTRATION), HIGH COURT OF KERALA, KOCHI-31. BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. M.R. SABU. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P. No. 13 of 2008 in W.P.(C) No. 23561 OF 2005 R = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 16th January, 2008 O R D E R The ground raised in the review petition is relating to the validity of the order of termination of the services of the review petitioner. A reading of paragraph 2 of the judgment itself shows that the reliefs sought for in the writ petition were not asked at the time when the writ petition was heard, but the argument was confined to the eligibility of the petitioner for being paid pension. This argument has been dealt with in the judgment. If that be so, the petitioner cannot contend that the judgment is vitiated on any ground that is available for review. Review petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-