Petjfloner Resnondents HIGH {SQUKf OF raiHATTISQARH: BILAWUR WritPetition (S) No. 7606 tit20 Smt. Anita Chauhan, W/o. Sant Kumar Chauhan, aged about 24years, R/o. Gadphuljhar village & PO Basna Block, Dist. Mahasamund, CG State. Versus 1) Stete of C.G. Thru: Secretaiy, Panchayat Raj, D.K.8. Bhavan, Raipur, Raipjr, CO State. 2) District Colteotor, Mahasamund District, CG.State. 3) Janpat Panchayat, through Executlve Officer, Basna Block, Dist Mahasamunet, 03 State. 4) Project OfRcer, tntegrated Chitel Development Scheme Basna, Dist. Mahasamund, CG.State. 5) Kum. Basanti. Dlo. Shti Jalai, Oadphuljhar (Viliage & PO) Basna Block, Mahasamund (CG). (Writ Petitiai under Articte 226 of the Constitution of tndia.) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Safish K. Agnlhotri, J. Present; Shri K.R. Nair.oounselforthepetitioneT, Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advooate for the respondents No. 1,2 & 4ffitate. ORALORDER (Passedon 28iBI Februaiy,2008) Learned counsel appearirg for the petltioners sutmits that the appointment of the respondent No.5 on the post of Argan Badi Worker for vlllage Gadphuljhar, Deveiopment Btock Basna, Dist. Mahasamund, is contrary to the Angan Barfi Sdieme and law. 2) Be that as it may, the disputed question of fects are involved in tftis matter, interest of justice would be subserved, if the present disputes are refered to the Dlstrict Collector for decislon after providlng opportunlty of hearing tothe concemaj parties. Learned counsel for the parties have no ctojection. 3) Accordingty, the matter is referred baok to the Collertor, lytahasamurri, for adjudicatlon In accordance wlth lawon Itsown mert, expedltiously. 4) Inviewoftheabove.thepetitionstandsdisposedof. ^_. S&l- . Raju -^' So.o^