IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4672 of 2010 Brajesh Kumar @ Rahul Raj, son of Upendra Narayan Singh, resident of village Urshary Shikarpur, P.S. Danapur, District- Patna ……….. Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar ………… Opp.Party ----------- 3. 19/05/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. A report was called for from the court below with regard to the stage of the trial and as to within what time the same is likely to be concluded. Report has been received from which it appears that the charges were framed against accused persons on 25.11.2009. Thereafter, summons, bailable as well as non-bailable warrants have been issued against the witnesses but no witness has appeared or has been produced by the prosecution in the trial for their evidence. It appears that the victim girl and her family members are also not appearing in the case for their evidence. Considering the said conduct of the victim girl and her family members, this application is allowed. Let petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond - 2 - of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge VI, Patna in Rajeevnagar P.S.Case No.112 of 2008 (S.Tr.No.168 of 2009) with conditions as laid down in Sub-Section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)