SBCWP NO.2980/09. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.2980/2009. Smt.Suchitra Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of order:- July 17, 2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Banwari Sharma for the petitioner. Shri Shantanu Sharma for the respondents. ***** BY THE COURT:- Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the common judgment passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Ms.Savita Samriya Vs. State & Ors. (SBCWP No.5238/09) and 31 other writ petitions decided on 22/5/2009 in which, following directions were issued by the court in para 16:- “(16) In the result, all the aforesaid writ petitions are disposed of in the following manner - (i) Point No.5 of the undertaking about not availing of legal remedy for continuation of appointment; furnishing of the undertaking SBCWP NO.2980/09. 2 on free will and without there being any undue pressure and in full consciousness without there being any influence of intoxication is declared illegal being violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. (ii) The termination of the petitioners contract during the continuance of the vacancies is held arbitrary and illegal; (iii)The respondents are restrained from appointing substitute College Lecturers for the session 2009-2010 against the vacancies on which the petitioners were appointed; (iv) As regards, continuation of the services of the petitioners after re-opening of the Colleges from 1.7.2009, the respondents are directed to consider the claim of the respective petitioners on priority basis for the session 2009-2010 and pass appropriate orders; (v) The petitioners shall not be entitled to the fixed amount as referred in the appointment letter for the period of closure of the respective colleges for summer vacations and further, they are entitled to the fixed amount from the date of their joining as per the order of continuation/fresh appointment in case it is given in the next academic session 2009-2010 in the light of the observations made hereinabove.” The writ petition is therefore disposed of in the light of the aforesaid judgment and ordered that the directions contained in para 16 shall mutatis mutandis apply to the present case as well. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil