PNP 1 WP8953-10.2.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8953 OF 2010 Tukaram Namdeo Suryawanshi ..Petitioner. versus The Vita Urban Co­operative Bank Ltd. and others ..Respondents. ..... Mr. Sameer S. Tambekar for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. ...... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & ANOOP V. MOHTA , JJ. 10 February 2011. P.C. : The relief that is sought in these proceedings is a direction to the First Respondent to give to the Petitioner the benefit of a debt waiver scheme formulated by the Reserve Bank of India. In response to a representation made to the Reserve Bank by the Petitioner, the Bank by a letter dated 17 September 2010 forwarded a reply received from the First Respondent on 27 August 2010. The letter of the First Respondent clarifies the position and notes that even after giving the benefit of requisite concessions to the Petitioner, there is a loan outstanding. In this view of the matter, we do not consider it appropriate and proper to exercise the writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The Petition is dismissed. (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.) (Anoop V. Mohta, J.)