SBa»«^^">»="" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ^ AT JABALPUR _WoP^ Nof^^ 4/1998 WRIT PETITION UNDER ART.226/227 OF THE CONSTITEJTION OF INDIA ^: Petitioner Vs. Ram s/o Ujlo Caste Mali aged 80 years resident of Village Kondasia PCN 3,Tahsil Gharghoda, ©isto Raigarh* &espondents ^ lo State of M^P^ throagh Secretary, ^everme Department Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal* 2, The Collector^ Raigarh» Disto Ralgarh^ M.P. 3. The sub Divlsional Officer ( civil ), Gharghoda , Dist. Raigarh, M,P* 4^ Harihar s/o Ramsai Caste Kanwar aged 70 years resldent of Village Kondsal Tafasil Gharghoda, Dist, Kaigarh» 5» Aasta Ram s/o Ramsai aged 75 years resident of Village Kondasai T^hsil Gharghoda^ Bist^ Raigarh, WRIT PETITION UNDER ART,226/227 OF THE, CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA n,«^...&^<-s..^-';i-;-*-"-;t—:-^__^ @) HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARHATJBlL^BPUR SB : HON»BLBSHRI JUSTICE N.K.AGRAWAL PBTITIONBR W.P.NO. 5624/1998 Anant Ram Versus RBSPONDBNTS State of C.G. & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226/227 QF THB CONSTITUTION OFINDIA Apoearance: Shri Ashish Surana, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta,G.A. for the State/resp. No. 1 to 3. Shri B.D.Guru, counsel for respondent No. 4 85 5. ORAL ORDER (06.08.2009) With the consent of leamed counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. The instant petition has been filed seeking relief to the effect that the entire proceedings of Revenue Case No. 59/A- 23/1991-92 pending before the Sub Divisional Officer, Gharghoda^ District Raigarh be quashed. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the proceedings pending before the Sub Divisional Officer is illegal as the said proceedings cannot be initiated by exercising the power of review of which, permission granted by Collector itself is not legal and prays for relief of quashment of the aforesaid revenue case pending before the SDO. On the other hand, counsel for the State submits that the petition is pre-mature and the point which the petitioner is raising before this Court^ has to be raised before the Sub Divisional Officer. Having heard counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case^ I am of the opinion that this petition is pre-mature and the petitioner can raise all the points which he is raising before this Court before the SDO. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as premature. _——— Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge