IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 283 of 2010 Prakash v. State of Maharashtra ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr A. S. Mardikar, Adv for applicant Mr S.B. Ahirkar, APP for State Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 3rd March 2010 Heard submissions at the bar. It is really surprising that the applicant who is Secretary of the Selection Committee, his anticipatory bail is objected while other members have been shown as witnesses as referred to in para 5 of the reply. It is also surprising to note from para 7 of the reply that bail is objected on the ground that the applicant on the basis of forged/bogus documents secured employment in Zilla Parishad for the candidates who did not belong to backward class category . This statement has been made casually for the sake of objection and it does not appear that mind was applied to the facts and circumstances of the case while drafting such reply. Under these circumstances, considering the fact that the alleged incident is of the year 2001, I am inclined to grant conditional bail to the applicant. Interim order granted on 17th February 2010 in favour of the applicant is confirmed subject to same conditions. In addition, it is directed that after charge sheet is filed, applicant shall appear before the trial Court and obtain regular bail. Application disposed of. Judge. Hsj