IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID FRIDAY, THE 5TH AUGUST 2011 / 14TH SRAVANA 1933 RP.No. 860 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN LAA.424/2003 Dated 17/10/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): APPELLANTS -------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, MR.GEORGE MECHERIL RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- SRI.ELAYAMBARI GANGADHARAN, S/O. IMBCHIKUTTA, FLORICAN HILL ROAD P.O., MALAPARAMBA, CALICUT-9. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ. .................................................................... R.P. No.860 of 2009 in L.A.A.No.424 of 2003 .................................................................... Dated this the 5th day of August, 2011. O R D E R Ramachandran Nair, J. This review petition filed by the State remains defective for non-service of notice on the respondent. However, when the matter came up in the defect list, we considered the review petition and heard the learned Government Pleader also. The purpose of the review petition is to reduce the enhancement of compensation granted by the Sub-Court and confirmed by this Court. However, we find that land involved in this case is only 0.0344 hectors of garden land. It is seen that the enhanced compensation awarded by the Sub Court and confirmed by this Court is only @ Rs.60,000/- per cent. In view of the steady increase in the land value loss in acquisition is only to the land owner. Further the extent of R.P.No.860/2009 in LAA No.424/2003 2 land and the compensation involved are not of serious consequence to the Government. We, therefore, dismiss the Review Petition. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) (HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE) jg