1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4988 OF 2009 Ramji Sakharam Rao. ... Petitioner V/s. Abdullah Majid Sahab Jendi (since deceased) through, 1) Smt. Fatima Abdullah Jendi & Ors. ... Respondents .................. Shri. M.N. Dhamal for Petitioner. Shri. B.M. Salunkhe for respondents. .................. CORAM : S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J DATE : 16th June, 2009. P.C. 1. Mentioned not on board. 2. It is clear that no order interlocutory or final is challenged. In earlier proceeding, the petitioner’s possession was protected and he was given liberty to apply for interim relief in a pending suit. In pending suit, the application for interim relief was disposed of and from that order no further proceedings are initiated. In these set of circumstances, the decree for possession has become enforceable but the petitioner has stated that he will make one last attempt to 2 apply for appropriate relief in Suit No. 3191 / 2007 and for that purpose this court should protect his possession. 3. The Petition is not maintainable and totally misconceived. It is accordingly dismissed. However, till 29 th June, 2009, the decree for possession of the premises in R.A.E. & R Suit No. 609/1451 of 1993 shall not be executed. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. ndm/wp4988.09