FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4075 OF 2011 "Udaykumar Sitaram Ahire Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. S.K. Patil, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, Assistant Govt. Pleader for respondent No.1 and 2. Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 7th SEPTEMBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 10th September,2011 vide which the appointment order issued in favour of the petitioner came to be withdrawn and his services came to be terminated. 2] Dr. Shrikant Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order is in violation of the principles of natural justice inasmuch as the petitioner has not been given any show cause notice prior to the impugned order being passed . 3] Undisputedly, the petitioner was appointed on compassionate ground. As per the terms of employment, an employees was required to file an affidavit stating therein that FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4075 OF 2011 "Udaykumar Sitaram Ahire Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 none of the members of his family is working either in a Government or Semi-Government organization. The petitioner has filed such an affidavit on a stamp paper of Rs.20/-. Subsequently, it has been revealed that the petitioner's elder brother namely, Prashant Sitaram Ahire, is in the permanent employment of the Jalgaon Municipal Council w.e.f. 13th May, 1997. The very basis on which the petitioner got appointment was by suppression of a material fact. A person who seeks equity must do equity. A person who is guilty of suppression of material fact and filing false affidavit is not entitled for any relief in the equitable jurisdiction. There is no merit in the petition. The same is dismissed. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-