-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.800 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.800 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.800 OF 2007 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.47 OF 1997 APPEAL NO.47 OF 1997 APPEAL NO.47 OF 1997 ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s appearances,Court’s Court’s Court’s Court’s or or or orders or directions orders or directions orders or directions Judge’s Judge’s Judge’s orders orders orders & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. ............................................................. ............................................................. Mr.G.N.Salunke for the Applicants CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : NOVEMBER 30,2007. : NOVEMBER 30,2007. : NOVEMBER 30,2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Applicants. The office noting shows that the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are duly served. The said Respondents are allegedly the purchasers of the above suit property during the pendency of the Appeal. The prayer (a) deserves to be granted. In so far as prayer (b) is concerned, the Applicants are a seeking direction against the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to produce the sale deed dated 27th November 1997. The said prayer also deserves to be granted. In so far as prayer (c) is concerned, it must be noted here that even after admission of the Appeal such injunction -2- was not granted in favour of the Applicants against the original Respondent. Therefore, such injunction cannot be granted against the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 who are claiming through the Respondent in the appeal. 2. Hence, Civil Application is disposed of by passing the following order : i) Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are directed to produce on record a certified copy of the sale deed dated 27th November 1997 referred to in this application. The certified copy shall be produced by the said Respondents after serving a copy thereof to the Advocate for the Appellant within a period of 8 weeks from the date of which notice of the application is served to the Respondents. ia) Prayer (a) is granted. Amendment to be carried out in six weeks. ii) Prayer (c) is rejected. -3- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE