IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No.45 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 8.1.2009. Krishan Lal ....Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr.Ashok Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL, J. **** Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without acquisition of the land the respondents are brick lining the water course. He further submits that he would be satisfied if the trial Court is directed to expedite the disposal of the suit as the petitioner is entitled to adequate compensation on account of acquisition of his land under the Haryana Canal and Drainage Act, 1974. Keeping in view the aforesaid averment of the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to direct the trial Court to expedite the disposal of the suit preferably within one year considering the fact that the stand of the petitioner is that he is being deprived of his property without payment of adequate compensation. The revision petition is disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) 8.1.2009 JUDGE Reema