IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16832 of 2010 1. ANIL KUMAR SAH @ MILTAN SAH 2. RAJIV RANJAN --------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 22.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that theft is super-addition followed by no recovery and abuse if any is given inside the house not in public view, so finding no case under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, petitioners’ prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia in Banmankhi P.S. Case No. 19 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)