crapln435.11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.435 OF 2011 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2 The Counsel for the applicants invited my attention to the grounds taken in the application and submitted that there is civil dispute between the applicants and the complainant and the applicants are falsely involved in the offence. He further submitted that there is delay in lodging the F.I.R. He, therefore, would submit that the application may be allowed. 3 The learned A.P.P. vehemently opposed the application and submitted that crapln435.11 2 specific overt-act is attributed to the applicants. The Additional Sessions Judge, after considering the investigation papers, has rejected the application and this Court may, therefore, reject the application. 4 Upon perusal of the F.I.R., it appears that there are specific allegations against these applicants and specific overt-acts are attributed to each of them. Hence, the application seeking anticipatory bail is rejected. Interim protection granted to the applicants stands vacated. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) 18.02.2011. PLK/*