IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.28260 of 2008 Between: M. Hari Narayana @ Hari Babu S/o. M. Chandraiah C/o. M/s. Sandhya 70 MM Theatre, D.No.1-7-106/71, RTC Cross Roads, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Deparment of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Joint Collector, Kadapa, Kadapa District. 3 P. Swaroopa Rani W/o. Bala Gangadhar Reddy R/o. H.No.19-4-3/H-12, STV Nagar, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. V.R.REDDY KOVURI FOR MR.C.DHARMA REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Show-Cause Notice in ROC.No.C4/318/M/2006, dated 05.11.2008 issued by the 2nd respondent, as illegal, lack of jurisdiction, contrary to the provisions of the A.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955 and the A.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1970 and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same.” At the hearing, Sri V.R.Reddy Kovuri, learned counsel representing Sri C.Dharma Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of passing of final order pending this writ petition, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.37039 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 9th JUNE, 2009. kvni