IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 1 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 536 OF 2009 M/S. SARDESSAI ENGINEERING WORKS AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 4 ORS., ... Respondents Applicant in person. Mr. S.S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 28th January, 2010 P.C.: Heard the petitioner no.2 in person. 2. It appears that for want of payment of Rs. 8 lacs, stipulated to be paid by the petitioners, by virtue of order dated 11/12/2009, the petitioners have received a notice of disconnection. The review application is certainly not the remedy against the said notice. The grounds taken up by the petitioners tantamount to rehearing the petition on its merits which cannot be allowed in review petition. 3. We find no merits in this review application. Hence the same is dismissed. N. A. BRITTO, J. U. D. SALVI, J. NH