HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 15th March, 2011 1st Bail Application No. 1022 of 2010 Order on the bail application of the accused. Rajeev Kumar S/o Shri Malkhan Singh ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In F.I.R. No. 4 of 2010 U/S 7, 13 (1) (d) r/w Section 13 (2) of Prevention of Corruption Act Police Station Vigilance Establishment, Nainital Sector Haldwani Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Shri Lalit Sharma, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri S.S. Adhikari, the learned A.G.A. for the State. The applicant is a Lekhpal and was caught in a trap case accepting a bribe of ` 10,000/-. The minimum sentence is one year and the applicant has spent almost 11 months in jail. The chargesheet has been filed on 17th June, 2010 and, till date, no witness has been produced by the prosecution. In the light of the aforesaid, this Court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in F.I.R. No. 4 of 2010 U/S 7, 13 (1) (d) r/w Section 13 (2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 15.03.2011 Shiv