THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.20775 of 2005 Date:22.09.2005 N.Narsi REddy --------PETITIONER A.P.S.R.T.C, rep. by its Vice Chairman & Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. ---------RESPONDENTS ORDER: The petitioner is a Driver in the Haytnagar Depot of A.P.S.R.T.C. He also claims to be the Secretary of Employees’ Union of that Depot. His grievance is that the 4th respondent is not following the rotation system, in the matter of allotting the duties to the drivers and the conductors. He seeks appropriate directions in this regard. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The writ petition is filed by the petitioner in his individual capacity. The grievance pointed out in the writ petition relates to all drivers and conductors working in the Hayatnagar Depot. Basically, it is for the concerned Trade Union to espouse this cause in accordance with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ‘the Act’). An individual driver or the Secretary of the Union in his individual capacity cannot approach this Court directly. For the foregoing reasons, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his remedies in accordance with the provisions of the Act. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 22.09.2005 Jsu