IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18708 of 2010 JAGARNATHI MAHTO & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.05.2010 This is the petition for restoration of Cr. Misc. No. 1212 of 2010 which stood dismissed on 9,3.2010 with the following orders: “Yesterday on request, the case was passed over for today. Today Md. Inteyaz Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner is present, but he does not argue the case saying that his Senior is engaged in another court. Since the case is not being argued, it is dismissed on account of non-prosecution”. Thus the case was dismissed because it was not argued. Despite one adjournment having been already allowed for that purpose, in this restoration application, any cogent reason is not shown for not arguing the case on 9.3.2010 when it was dismissed on account of non-prosecution. Finding no merits, this application is, accordingly, dismissed. (C.M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-