1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3723 of 2009 (Shri Sanjay N. Puri v. Shri Rameshchandra D. Jeswani) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri S.A. Deo, Advocate for Petitioner. Coram : R.C. Chavan, J. Dated : 1 st September, 2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This petition is directed against the order passed by the learned 19 th Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nagpur, rejecting the petitioner’s application for condonation of delay in preferring an application for review. The ground on which the condonation of delay is sought is that the Advocate gave an incorrect advise. If this ground were to be accepted, in every matter, the condonation of delay would have to be allowed as a matter of course, because one Advocate would blame the other and show that for want of proper advice, the application could not be made. If there is a misconduct on the part of the Advocate, then after making a complaint to 2 the Bar Council, the condonation of delay could be sought, but mere wrong advice or incompetence of lawyer would not be sufficient. It is the fate of the petitioner in choosing a lawyer, who did not give him proper advice. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. The petitioner can always move DILR for measurement independently and without the assistance of the Court and tender appropriate evidence before the Court. Judge. pdl