1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 551 OF 2010 (Sau. Mandatai D. Nikhade vs. Hon’ble Minister Rural Development, Min. of Rural Development & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. APRIL 19, 2010. Heard Shri Thakre, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Kankale, learned AGP for respondents No. 1 & 2, Shri Raut, learned counsel for respondent No.3 and Shri Kukday, learned counsel for respondents No. 5 & 6. The respondents have pointed out to this Court that on 02.02.2009 specific notice was issued to the petitioner to appear before the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) on 09.09.2009 and accordingly she has appeared and on that date, her statement was recorded. The petitioner before this Court has accepted the communication dated 02.02.2009, however, that communication is not disclosed in the body of the petition. The petitioner has also not stated that on 09.09.2009 she appeared or did not appear before CEO. It is, therefore, apparent that the material facts have been suppressed from this Court by the petitioner. In the impugned order, the Hon’ble Minister has found that after perusal of records, he was satisfied 2 that the inquiry was conducted by the CEO personally. In view of this position and state of affairs, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.