IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (MS) No. 2656 of 2011 Jai Raj Singh and others …Petitioners Versus Rehabilitation Director/District Magistrate Tehri Garhwal and another …Respondents Present : Mr. J. C. Belwal, Advocate present for the petitioners. Mr. H.M.Raturi, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for respondent no.2. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. J. C. Belwal, Advocate for the petitioners, Mr. H. M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand and Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for respondent no.2. 2. The petitioners were displaced due to the construction of Tehri Dam. According to the petitioners, they have not been rehabilitated as yet. Since, the matter has not been looked into by the authority, petitioners have filed the present writ petition. 3. Mr. Shobhit Saharia, who represents the Tehri Hydro Development Corporation, has raised a preliminary objection and made a statement before this Court that the petitioners may raise their grievance before Grievance Redressal Cell, which has been constituted for such disputes. 4. Learned Standing Counsel Mr. H. M. Raturi has also stated that such redressal forum is presently working in Tehri Garhwal. 2 5. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to move a representation before the “Grievance Redressal Cell”, which shall decide the same, as expeditiously as possible but definitely within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before it. 4. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 19.12.2011 Kuldeep