IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0. t& <-3 /2005 PETITIONER o •^' .^'^?3^. ^/e^" // ^^s^- /y /^^^.^ ^/^ ^M^i/l^//^' ^-^y'M-'"""v.*. ^ ' •^~ '^-~. -C-: /' "•^"'^•.•^^y-'^v "^i' ''^..^f'' VERSUS Shyam Lal Ahir , son of Shri Ghasiya -^Ahir, aged about 20 years (presently 41 years), Ad-hoc Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School Bundeli, Tah. Mahasamund (Earlier Distt. Raipur, Presently Mahasamund), Resident of village Chaarbhatha, Post Rikokala, Via Sankra Jonk, Tahsil and Distt. Mahasamund. RESPQNDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through : the Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) ^r^ p-/- ^'^^ 2. The Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchalnalay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 3. The District Education Officer, Education Distt. Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) 4. The State of Madhya Pradesh through : the Secretary, Department of Education, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLES 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA "81 i ;i XI-HC-22 3Tl^T?iT f^Nisn^r rf^r sbtIRid ^•':,-i?:^Kl^v s::;'^?^ 3^ "4NI<1<<, ®Tf)y'IS,(s|ivll+l^< W1WI 9iHI«h ail^lM;l<ft .(^.:P.;.J.b'7.2.. /3A V^ 200S" aiwiswiwofer s.1 (Soverhment Advocate with Shri Shri A.N.E Shri Sandeep &ubey, Akhil Aa"awal, Panei Lawyer, flor the 5tate on advance copy. 1.A. No. 2034/200S foi| The main grievance of of the origina' application N4 Administrative Tribundl, Raip| this Court tiil date. Learned counsel for tH presently this petition be di: sald originai application be cal Administratjye Tribuna.i, benc and the matt-er be disposed of Counsel for the petitio^ S.A.T. has been abolishec trnnsferring the matter to thj transfer'rsd in a routine mannel does no' urgent hearing is allowed. Ithe oetitioner' is that the records by counsel for the petitioner q^fe^T WRft'tf fecit rf^ZTC ^srf^TSII^T for the petitioner. 138/98, fiied before the State br has not been transferred to e petitioner m'ckes a prcyer that Iposed of and the records of the bd or ^ro.nsferred from the Stote h at Raipur, as early as jaossibis in accordance with law. ler furthe" submlts that since ths |, there is no impediment in |is Court as the rnatters are to be IM f oppose the limited prayer made ast-iiis '"i.;;'i .'•^ 'v- ^ f .. "'. '-?;vW -'gti^.. ^fr- 1 Kw f liO rjr" r-i oc-^-+ -h "T; o 3 Vi r B)-+ 3- 3 "3 d. u o i1 re "o J •-< IA o o '-+, o TT Q. & •o t: u> co '<s. (~* 'I.M3 <fl ^ -j. —tl 1 -t-0 sn t^) M ^ Jj ^l 3j^l ^^ II •ffl) 5p 3) al w1