^ °^^ HiGHJ;PURTpf.,CHHAJ11SGARH.AT.BLLASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No 3272 of 2009 PET1I10N_ER : Mahavir Prasad S/o Ajitmal Jain, aged about 72 years, DeshbhAishan Steei Corporstion Teighani Naka, Raipur (C.G.) VER.SUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattiagarh Through: The Seuretary, Town & Country Planning, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ra'pur (C.G.) 2. The Municipai Corporation, Raipur, through: The Commissioner, Munic-ipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.5 WRrr^T!TLQNUNDEKARIJCLE226_OFJ;HE_CON.ST!TUT!^^^ SB:_Hon'.bie:ShrLSatish_SGAgn|hotr!,_.l Shri Goutaiti Bhaduri, Advocate for the petitioner. ShriArun Sao,Govcrn(nentAdvocateiortheState/FespondentNo. 1. Shri H.B.Agrawa), Senior Advocate with Shri J.K.Qupta, Advocatefor the respondent No. 2. SAy (Passed on 10" day of July, 2009) Heard'. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage, however, the respondente may be directed to consider and decide his representation in accordance with iaw. Shri Sao, learned CQunsel appaaring for the State submits that in the event, a fresh representation is made, the same may be considered and decided in 4. Shri Agrawal, learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 submits that it is for the State/respondent No. 1 to decide the dispute as raised in the petition and the same may be considered by way crf representation.if any, fiied by the petitioner. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of, as nothing remains for adjudication. The respondent-State is accordingly directed to consider and dedde the representation of the petitioner, it any, in accordance with lav-;, on its own merits within a period of 10 weeks from the date of receipt of the sOWf; Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge