IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 26TH AUGUST 2008 / 4TH BHADRA 1930 RP.No. 911 of 2008(B) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.12613/2008 Dated 10/04/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITINERS : PETITIONERS. ----------------- 1. KUNJAMMA, K., NELLIKKUNNUMMEL HOUSE, POZHUTHANA P.O., WAYANAD. 2. VASANTHA, N., MANACKAL HOUSE, POZHUTHANA P.O., WAYANAD. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WAYANAD, CIVIL STATION, WAYANAD. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, WYTHIRI, WAYANAD DISTRICT. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ACHURANAM VILLAGE, POZHUTHANA VILLAGE, POZHUTHANA, WAYANAD. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. K.R. DEEPA. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P. No. 911 of 2008 in W.P.(C) No. 12613 OF 2008B = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 26th day of August 2008 O R D E R Counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner was a resident of the Pozhuthana Village, it was by a mistake of fact that Ext. P2 application was made to the 3rd respondent on the basis of which relief was sought in the writ petition and judgment was rendered. Now that the learned counsel for the petitioner himself confesses about the factual mistake which led to the judgment, I am satisfied that the judgment is vitiated due to a factual error apparent on the face of the record. Accordingly, the Review Petition is allowed and the judgment is recalled. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-