THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3633 OF 2008 ORDER: The petitioner, who is a judgment debtor, filed this revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, inter alia, seeking to assail the order dated 20.06.2008 in E.P.No.98 of 2008 in O.S.No.2063 of 2005 on the file of the V Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in issuing order under Form No.19 to attach salary of the Public Officer of Servant of Railway Company or Local Authority. The only question involved in this revision is as to whether the petitioner-surety can only be proceeded against leaving all other judgment debtors, who are also jointly and severally liable under the Chit transaction. There is no dispute in regard to the decree or such joint liability. However, it is pointed out that having regard to the nature of employment, it is very difficult for the petitioner to sustain herself and to meet the needs of her family and therefore, she may not be chosen to be proceeded against. It is now well settled that as long as the decree is joint and several, to pick, choose and proceed against any one of the judgment debtors is not an error. However, it is submitted that already substantial amount under the decree has been discharged and the balance to be paid is only Rs.50,000/- {Rupees fifty thousand only}. Hence, it is felt justifiable to grant some more time to the petitioner to pay the said balance amount. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of and the petitioner is granted time for a period of six {6} months from today for paying the balance, as exists or as may exist as on the date by the end of the period of six {6} months. Till that time, execution shall not be proceeded against her. However, it is open for the first respondent to proceed against the other judgment debtors namely respondents 2 to 7 herein. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 12th August 2010 RRB