THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4697 of 2005 ORDER: The petitioners are the tenants in respect of an extent of Ac.1.75 cents of agricultural land in Survey Nos.71/2 and 71/3 of Sitaramapuram Village, Maddipadu Mandal, Prakasam District, owned by the respondents. The latter, filed A.T.C.No.30 of 2000 before the Principal Junior Civil Judge and Special Officer, Tenancy Tribunal, Ongole for eviction of the petitioners on the ground of default in payment of rents. The petitioners pleaded title in themselves and disputed the very existence of the tenancy. Through its order, dated 24.02.2003, the trial Court allowed the A.T.C. and ordered eviction of the petitioners. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioners filed A.T.A.No.4 of 2003 in the Court of the II Additional District Judge, Ongole. The appeal was dismissed through order, dated 04.07.2005. Hence, this revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. Several grounds are urged by the learned counsel for the petitioners in his attack to the order under revision. It is pleaded that there did not exist any relationship of tenants and landlords between the petitioners and the respondents. There is an important factor that dissuades this Court to discuss the matter on merits. While admitting the revision on 23.09.2005, this Court did not grant any interim order in favour of the petitioners. It is reported that they have been evicted from the schedule property, through execution of the decree. Therefore, nothing remains to be determined at this stage. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:24.08.2009 kdl