IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 28TH MARCH 2011 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 28490 of 2008(N) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. DFS FOUNDATION & STRUCTURES 149, 4TH FLOOR, PENTA MENAKA, SHANMUGHAM ROAD, COCHIN 682 018, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER SHRI. USMAN M.E. 2. ABAD BUILDERS (P) LTD. ABAD PLAZA BUILDING, M.G.ROAD COCHIN 682011. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER PATTIMATTOM POLICE STATION ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER ERNAKULAM. 5. THE ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT tss W.P.(C) NO.28490/2008 6. ERNAKULAM JILLA KETTIDA NIRMANA THOZHILALI UNION (CITU) KIZHAKKAMBALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN 683562, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY. 7. THE DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION WORKERS UNION, KIZHAKKAMBALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN 683 562, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY 8. THE ERNAKULAM DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION (AITUC) KIZHAKKAMBALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN 683652, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY. R1 TO R5 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.C.M.CHARISMA R7 BY ADVS. SRI.C.S.AJITH PRAKASH, SRI.T.D.SALIM, SRI.PAUL C THOMAS. R6 BY ADVS. SRI.M.PAUL VARGHESE, SRI.DESI MATHAI. R8 BY ADVS. SRI.MAJNU KOMATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- WPC No.28490 of 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th March, 2011 JUDGMENT Basant, J. This petition for police protection filed as early as on 24.9.2008 remains without disposal even now. The matter had come up for hearing last on 30.9.2008. The matter has been listed today by the Registry along with old unnecessarily pending matters. 2. There is no representation for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the sixth respondent submits that the construction is almost complete and this petition has lost its relevance now. We are satisfied that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. R.BASANT JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE css/