S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6848/2008 Smt. Sushila Chouhan & Anr. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date of Order :: 1.12.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr Lalit Purohit, for the petitioner/s. Mr Shyam Toshniwal, for the respondents. ... The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondents while considering their candidature for the purpose of appointment to the post of Prabodhak are not taking into consideration the period of training undergone by them after their appointment as Para Teacher as part of teaching experience, as defined under Rule 2(k) of the Rajasthan Prachayatraj Prabodhak Rules, 2008. The issue as to whether such period is required to be considered as teaching experience or not has already been considered and decided by this Court in SBCivil Writ Petition No.6766/2008 (Shankar Lal Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) on 15.10.2008. In the case aforesaid this Court has taken a view that the leave period relating to training after appointment as Para Teacher is required to be considered as teaching experience under the provisions of the Rules of 2008. In view of it this petition for writ deserves acceptance, and therefore, the same is allowed. The respondents are directed to consider candidature of petitioners for appointment on the post of Prabodhak in district Sirohi and appointment be accorded to them if they find place in select list as per their merit and are otherwise eligible to hold the post of Prabodhak. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal '