é 0f \crb7f @ $W§$E §£§E§§CH IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT‘BILASPUR w.P.(S)No. 3Z0 0F2011. / Lalit Kumar Pradhan S/ o. Shri Shaukhi Lal Pradhan, aged about 35 years, R/o. Village Pussaur, (Borodeepa), Post Pussaur, Distt. Raigarh (C. G.) PETITIONER VERSUS :1.” State of Chhattisgafh, Through z The Secretary, School ‘ Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) RESPONDENTS t’ 2. Director, School Education Deparmen, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3./ District Education dfficer, Raigarh, District‘Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA tt HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 320 of2011 PETITIONER : Lalit Kumar Pradhan. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shl‘i Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Sushobhit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. t. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 213‘ day of January, 201 1) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitoiner has made a representation to the Director, Public Instructions on 17.02.2010. Till date, no decision has been taken on the said representation. 2. Shii Dubey. learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that the decision on the representation of the petitioner, as stated above, shall be taken as early as possible, preferably Within a period ofthree weeks nom the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. In view of the above submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is disposed of, as even otherwise, there is no other prayer, except seeking direction to decide the representation. Sd/-‘ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit