1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2362 OF 2006 Abdul Sattar Haji Usman & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.V.A.Gangal i/b Mr.A.T.Gade for the petitioners Ms.Mamta Saadh, A.G.P.for the respondent no.1 to 5 CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL & & & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2007 DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2007 DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2007 P.C.: 1. Mentioned. Not on board. 2. Heard. 3. The petition can be disposed of at the stage of admission itself as the petitioners restrict the relief sought in the petition to prayer clause (b) which reads as under: 2 "that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, ordering and directing Respondent no.2 to decide the Revision Application - Ex.G to the Petition, expeditiously within time bound Schedule with such further directions as this Hon’ble Court deems fit." 4. It is the grievance of the petitioners that though the revision application is pending with the State Government for more than 2 1/2 years, the same is not yet decided. We expect the respondent State to dispose of the revision within a period of 3 months from the date of communication of this order by the petitioners to the competent authority before whom the revision is pending. 5. Petition stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. ( SHRI J.N. PATEL, J ) ( SHRI J.N. PATEL, J ) ( SHRI J.N. PATEL, J ) 3 ( SHRI S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J ) ( SHRI S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J ) ( SHRI S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J )