1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.387 OF 2009. IN WRIT PETITION NO.3193 OF 2009 (D). SHRI KISANCHAND S/O CHOITHRAM KEWALRAMANI VS SMT.SITABAI WD/O NARAYANJI ATKAR (DECEASED) THRO. SMT. INDUBAI W/O NAMDEORAO SHENDE. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A. Shelat, Advocate for appellant. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 27th November, 2009. Learned Advocate Mr. P. D. Randive for the respondent makes a statement that the landlord’s suit has been dismissed on 29-8-2009. The question involved in this case is due to the fact of dismissal of apeal which turns out to be purely academic as the lis is not available to the appellant. In view what this Court has observed above, the present letters patent appeal turns out to be without cause of action and is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE |Muley|