THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.9 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed W.P.No.26456 of 2009 alleging that respondent No.2 is making illegal construction encroaching into a public lane and despite a complaint being submitted, respondent No.1 has not taken any steps. An interim order was passed by this Court on 04.12.2009, directing that respondent No.1 shall ensure that no construction is made by respondent No.2, except with specific permission from the Cantonment Board. This contempt case is filed alleging that despite the orders of this Court, respondent No.2 made construction and that respondent No.1 remained silent. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1. On behalf of respondent No.1, it is represented that when it was found that respondent No.2 made construction without permission and contrary to the orders passed by this Court, notices were issued and the illegal construction was demolished in the last week of January, 2010. With this, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. Hence, the contempt case is closed. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:17.02.2010 kdl