IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 5TH JULY 2011 / 14TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 18124 of 2011(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SACHIN C.P, S/O.PREMKUAMR P,AGED 22 YEAR PAVITHRAM, DOPHIN NAGAR, SEKHARIPURAM PO PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. SUJITH MOHAN V, VELUTHEDATHU HOUSE PARALAM PO, VENGINISSERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. BALAMURALI K.B, KUNJUVEETTIL HOUSE, POYNKULAM PO, CHERUTHURUTHY,THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. MANOJ M, KRISHNA PRIYA, SOUTH STREET KOLLAMKODE PO, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 5. VINEETH GOPINATHAN KRISHNA, PADHUPPARIYARAM PO, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 6. VIMAL S VRINDAVANAM, NEDUNGOTTUR SHORNUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR,OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY PO, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN 673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLING OF EXAMINATIONS UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY PO, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN 673 635. SC SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 18124 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 18.6.2011 EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BYTHE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 18.6.2011 EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER DATED 18.6.2011 EXT.P4- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER DATED 18.6.2011 EXT.P5- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 5TH PETITIONER DATED 18.6.2011 EXT.P6- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 6TH PETITIONER DATED 18.6.2011 (True Copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No. 18124 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of July, 2011. JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners were the students of B.Tech Mechanical Engineering Degree Course. When the result of the 6th semester Examination was declared, they failed in some papers and therefore, they applied for revaluation vide Exts.P1 to P6, and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 'ten weeks' of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. ANTONY DOMINIC Judge mrcs