IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42398 of 2008 1. SUKHARI RAI 2. UMESH RAI 3. RAJESH RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a police case under sections 302,307,427 and 34 of the Penal Code. The submission is that in 2004 final form was submitted but differing with which cognizance has been taken. It is fairly acknowledged that the deceased died of a road accident. The last submission is that at best 304A is made out. In the facts and circumstances of the case when the petitioner be named, this Court on the aforesaid submission is not persuaded to grant them the privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. If the petitioners be named, any application for regular bail on their behalf shall be considered appropriately in the background of the submission under section 304A of the Penal Code, without being prejudiced by the present order. Let the order be communicated by Fax at the cost of the petitioners. HR ( Navin Sinha ) - 2 -