THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.1701 of 2011 Dated 24th June, 2011 Between: Vallapu Manjunath …Petitioner And Vallapu Aruna …Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Sri G.L.Nageswara Rao Counsel for respondent: Smt.A.Jayanthi The Court made the following: ORDER: This civil revision petition arises out of order, dated 01.02.2011, in I.A.No.735 of 2010, in O.P.No.5 of 2010, on the file of the Family Judge-cum- Additional Sessions Judge, Nalgonda. I have heard Sri G.L.Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Smt.A.Jayanthi, learned counsel representing the respondent. The petitioner is the husband of the respondent. The respondent filed O.P.No.5 of 2010 for restitution of conjugal rights against the petitioner. The respondent examined herself as PW.1 and she was cross-examined by the respondent on 03.12.2010. On 14.12.2010, the petitioner filed I.A.No.735 of 2010 requesting the Court to recall PW.1 for further cross-examination. In the affidavit filed in support of this IA, the reason put forth by the petitioner for seeking recalling of PW.1 is that he changed his counsel and that the new counsel has advised him to file this IA, as there are some important points, on which, PW.1 has to be cross-examined. The Court below has dismissed and in my opinion rightly, the IA filed by the petitioner. As rightly observed by the lower Court, mere change of counsel cannot be a ground to subject the opposite party to further cross-examination. Therefore, I do not find any error of law or jurisdiction in the order passed by the Court below in rejecting the IA filed by the petitioner. For the above-mentioned reasons, the civil revision petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the civil revision petition, C.R.P.M.P.No.2429 of 2011 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 24th June, 2011 VGB