IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Arb. Case No. 22 of 2010 alongwith Arb. Case No. 23 of 2010. Decided on: 3.6.2011. 1. Arb. Case No. 22 of 2010. Municipal Council .…Petitioners/Objectors Versus Naresh Kumar Tuli ..….Respondent. 2. Arb. Case No. 23 of 2010. Municipal Council …Petitioners/Objectors Versus Naresh Kumar Tuli ..….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioners/Objectors: Mr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, Executive Officer, M.C. Paonta Sahib in person with Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate. (in both the cases) For the Respondent : Respondent in person with Mr. S.R. Sharma, Advocate. (in both the cases) Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) In sequel to order dated 26th May, 2011, Mr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Paonta Sahib (HP) is present in person. Mr. Naresh Kumar Tuli, respondent is also present in person with his Advocate. Mr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, on the basis of the resolution bearing No. 25, dated 30.5.2011, submits that the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No. petitioners have agreed to settle the matter with the respondent by paying him a lump sum amount of Rs. 18,47,577/-. Mr. Naresh Kumar Tuli has accepted the offer made to him by Mr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Paonta Sahib (HP). Copy of resolution bearing No. 25, dated 30.5.2011 is taken on record. 2. Consequently, both the cases are disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to pay a sum of Rs. 18,47,577/- to the respondent, as undertaken herein above, on the basis of the resolution bearing No. 25, dated 30.5.2011, within a period of 30 days from today. It is made clear that if the amount, as undertaken, within the stipulated period is not paid, the Court will be constrained to invoke its contempt jurisdiction. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. Copy dasti on usual terms. June 3, 2011. (Rajiv Sharma) (hl) Judge