CRM No. M-1161 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-1161 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.3.2009 Kiran Wati ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. R.S. Randhawa, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Senior DAG, Haryana with. Mr. J.S. Hooda, Advocate, for the complainant. Rajan Gupta, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to order dated January 19, 2009, the petitioner has already joined the investigation. He further submits that the petitioner is a lady having two minor children and her custodial interrogation is not required. Learned counsel for the State (on the instructions from ASI Ganpat Ram), who is present in Court) does not dispute this position. Keeping in view the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the petitioner deserves the concession of anticipatory bail. Consequently, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated January 19, 2009 is hereby made absolute subject to conditions envisaged by Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE March 23, 2009 'rajpal'