CRP 294/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE MAIBAM BK SINGH Heard Mr A Y Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. This revision petition has been filed against the order dated 28.06.2010 , passed by the learned Civil Judge, Hailakandi, in Money Suit No. 9 of 2008. The present petitioner who is the defendant in the said Money Suit is ag grieved that his petition being No. 779/3, praying for calling certain case reco rds from the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Hailakandi, was not entertained. Howe ver, on perusal of the impugned order dated 28.06.2010, it is ascertained that t he said petition was not entertained on the ground that a similar petition being petition No. 135/16 praying for calling the said records was filed by the said defendant way back on 19.01.2010. The learned Civil Judge also found that an app ropriate order was passed with reference to the said application on 19.01.2010 b ut the defendant failed to take appropriate steps for calling those records. On a careful consideration of the facts and circumstances under which the said peti tion No. 779/3 was not entertained by the learned Civil Judge, I do not find any appreciable reason for interfering with the impugned order in exercise of power s conferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, this re vision petition is not admitted. The petitioner shall have to take appropriate steps, as directed by the learned Civil Judge, Hailakandi, vide order dated 19.01.2010 passed, passed in p etition No. 135/16. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the revision petition st ands disposed of.