IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7818 of 2009 YOGENDRA NARAYAN SINGH, son of late Raghunandan Singh, resident of village & Post Office-Gamail, Police Station- Bihariganj, District- Madhepura…. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Chief Secretary to the Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Director, Higher Education, New Secretariat, Patna. 5. The Regional Director of Education, Kosi Division, Saharsa 6. The Collector-cum- District Magistrate, Madhepura 7. The Sub-divisional Officer, Uda-kishunganj, District- Madhepura 8. The Bihar School Examination Board, Higher Secondary Section, Patna through its Secretary. 9. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. 10. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. 11. The Director, Higher Secondary Education, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. 12. Hansi Mandal College, Bhagwat Nagar, Bihariganj, District- Madhepura through its Governing Body. 13. Sri Suresh Prasad Singh, son of late Bhagwat Yadav, permanent resident of Kusthan, Post Office-Bihariganj, Police Station- Bihariganj, District- Madhepura…. Respondents. --- For the petitioner: Mr. Vindhaya Keshri Kumar, Senior Advocate Mr. Ranjit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State: Mr. A.S. Jha, S.C. 9 For respondent Nos. 8 to 11: Mr. P.K.Shahi, Senior Advocate --- 4. 4.2.2010 Heard Mr. Vindhaya Keshri Kumar, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.K. Shahi, learned Senior Counsel for the respondents. Regard being had to the controversy in question, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly stated that he shall bring all the facts to the notice of the Bihar School Examination Board and the Board should look into the matter within the parameters of law. - 2 - Mr. P.K. Shahi, learned Senior counsel, who appears for the Board, fairly stated that he has no objection to the same. In view of the aforesaid, it is directed that if a representation is made stating the allegations in detail, the same shall be looked into by the Board within the prescribed parameters of law. We clarify that our directions would not clothe the Board with any kind of power which it does not possess. The Board shall deal with the matter and finalise the same within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the representation. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (Dipak Misra,C.J.) (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.) VPS