IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36315 of 2008 PRABHAKAR TIWARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.11.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State as also the informant. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Penal Code. The submission is of false implication supported by distant nature of relationship by marriage. It is next submitted that earlier final form was submitted, differing with which cognizance has been taken. The husband of the deceased has been enlarged on regular bail. The allegations arte under Section 304B of the Penal Code. The name of the petitioner find regular reference in the FIR with allegations. That he has been chosen to be named out of several relatives by marriage persuades this Court that present is not a fit case for privilege of anticipatory bail. This application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merit including grant of regular bail to co-accused without being prejudiced by the present order. Let this order be communicated by fax at the cost to be deposited by the petitioner. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)