IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.663 of 2010 RAJ NARAIN PANDEY, SON OF LATE SAGAR PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. PAKRI, AT PRESENT VILLAGE + P.O. MADARPUR, P.S. MASRAKH, DISTRICT- SARAN…………………………………PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER. Versus 1. SURENDRA SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM AVATAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-NAWADA, P.S. MASHRAKH, DISTRICT-SARAN. ………………………DEFENDANT NO.1-OPPOSITE PARTY. 2. DEWANTI DEVI, WIFE OF RAMJI SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. DILSHADPUR, P.S. BHAGWANPUR, DISTRICT-SIWAN. 3. MOSMAT SIYAPATI DEVI, WIFE OF LATE NAGENDRA THAKUR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-P.O. SISAI, P.S. BANIAPUR, DISTRICT-SARAN. 4. SHYAMDEO PRASAD, SON OF VIJADHAR PRASAD. 5. RAJ KAPOOR PRASAD. 6. SURYADEO PRASAD. 7. SATYENDRA PRASAD, ALL 5 TO 7 SONS OF KULDIP PRASAD. ALL 5 TO 7 ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. MADARPUR, P.S. MASHRAKH, DISTRICT-SARAN. ……………………..DEFENDANT 2ND SET..OPP. 2ND PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : M/s. Kapildeo Singh-I and Vijay Kumar, Advocates. ------------- 2. 22.7.2010. It has been pointed out by the office that since the plaint of the concerned Title Suit had already been rejected that would amount to a decree as per the provisions of Section 2(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure and, as such, the proper remedy 2 would be of filing an appeal. Learned counsel does not contest the stamp report and seeks permission to withdraw this Civil Revision to file an appeal before the court of competent jurisdiction. Permission is accorded. This Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)