HtGt+COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR Writ PetiSon (G) No. 6896 of 2006 PetiConer Versus sspondents 1. 2. 3. Phool Singh Netam, S/o Late Shri Sukddu Netam, aged about 40 years, Asst. Teacher, Govt. Highsr Ssconda"/ School, Pharasgaon, Distt. Baster, (C.G.), R/o Pharasgaon, Distt. Baster (C.G>, State of Chhatti^arh, Through- Secretary, Schooi Education OsparttnenS, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Baster, Distt. Baster (C.G.) Secretary, Finance Departmant of Chhattisgarh Stete, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) WR!T PETITOiN UNDER ARTICLE 22S OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF INDIA ingte Bsnch : Hon'bis Mf. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri J. K. Shastri, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Safeh Gupta, Depuly Govt. Advocate for the respondente. ¥-• ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 1 day of February, 2008) Leamed counss! appearing for She petitioner as weil as leamed counsei appearing for the respondents/State joinUy submlS that Uie facts and question of Saw, Jnvoived In She prasent writ petition, are the same asto that of m Yashv/anS Kumar BharaAvaj Vs. Municipai Corporation, Durg and another (2006 (!i) MPJR-CG 96), which has been disposed of vide orderdated 3.4.2006. Accordingly, Shs writ petttion is aiiowed in terms offte order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (supra), subject to verificatjon of ths fact asto whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed./B.T.i. Examinatfon Certificate on his own ei^enses, as per the circuiars dated 24.12.1998 1.3.1999 and further .vhether he has been paid two advance increinente or no{. No order asto costs. Thakur Sd/- Satish KAgniiiotri Judge fc:' JKS