SCA/6666/1998 1/3 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6666 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ ===================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ===================================================== SECRETARY - Petitioner(s) Versus GOVERNMENT LABOUR OFFICER & 19 - Respondent(s) ===================================================== Appearance : MRS SANGEETA N PAHWA for Petitioner(s) : 1, MR L B DABHI Ld.AGP for Respondent(s) : 1, MR KM PATEL for Respondent(s) : 2, RULE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 3, MR GM JOSHI for Respondent(s) : 4 - 20. ===================================================== CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ Date : 30/01/2006 ORAL JUDGMENT SCA/6666/1998 2/3 JUDGMENT 1. The petitioner i.e. Gujarat Mazdoor Panchayat has filed this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying for quashing and setting aside letter dated 19.12.1997 issued by respondent no.1 and seeking direction to respondent no.1 to take appropriate steps against the respondent nos.2 and 3 for not implementing the award dated 28.05.1997 in Reference (LCA) No.1813 of 1982. 2. The petitioners have also prayed for the direction to respondent no.1 to take appropriate action against respondent nos.2 and 3 for non implementing the award during the pendency and final disposal of this petition. 3. The petition was admitted and rule was issued on 19.04.1999 and it was ordered to be heard alongwith SCA 7621 of 1998 and SCA No. 638 of 1998. 4. During the pendency of this petition, C.A.330 of 2000 was filed by 17 persons seeking impleadment of their names in SCA 6666 of 1998. The said application was disposed of and they were joined as party respondents being respondent nos.4 to 20 in SCA 6666/98. SCA/6666/1998 3/3 JUDGMENT 5. The petitioner union and the respondents have sought implementation of the award. The said award is the subject matter of challenge in SCA No.7621 of 1998, wherein the settlement is arrived at between the parties and the same is taken on record. 6. In view of the settlement arrived at and in view of the order passed in SCA No. 7621 of 1998, nothing survives in this petition and hence, the petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. (K.A.PUJ, J.) amit