IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.947 of 2010 1. MD. FURQUAN 2. Md. ARMAN 3. Md. Naiyar Alam @ Naiyar 4. Md. Jafar Alam @ Jabar 5. Alam Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 03.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, learned counsel for the informant. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that offence under Section 3 (I)(X) of the S.C./S.T. (prevention of atrocities), Act is not made out as no abuse was given in the case rather some order was given by petitioner no.1 to his fellowmen to lift the brother of the informant forcing withdrawal of the case, in that continuation, some abuse is used that was not directly which may never be taken for humiliation. Further, submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that it was a political rivalry only and informant has been used as a weapon by the present Chairman. I am not convinced by the learned counsel for the informant that the allegation constitutes any offence under Section 3(I) (X) of the S.C/S.T. (prevention of atrocities), Act. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 207 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 2 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Purnia subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)