IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.18663 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : February 01, 2010. Birpal Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.N.S.Kandhola, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner impugns the advertisement dated 23.9.2009 (Annexure P-2), inviting applications for selection to various posts in the Education Department, Punjab. The petitioner's grievance is that in terms of the impugned advertisement, she has become overage. The petitioner is said to have sent a representation to the authority on 23.10.2009 (Annexure P-3). In the absence of any alleged violation of statutory Rules/Instructions or Government Policy regarding fixation of the minimum or maximum age limits, no interference in the impugned advertisement is called for by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction. C.W.P.No .18663 of 2009 (O&M) 2 The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his remedy before the appropriate authority and in accordance with law. Dasti. 01-02-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE