-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2688 OF 2011 Sampatrao Balaso Patil & Ors. ..Petitioners. Versus Divisional Jt. Regi & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Amit Borkar for the petitioners. Mr. S. N. Bhosale, AGP for R-1, 2 & 16. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : April 5, 2011. P. C. : 1. Heard Mr. Borkar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Bhosale, learned AGP for Respondent nos. 1, 2 & 16. In my view, the presence of other respondents for the disposal of this writ petition is not necessary. 2. The petitioner challenges the order dated 21/10/2009 passed by the Minister, Co-operation Department, Government of Maharashtra in a revision under section 154 of the M.C.S. Act, 1960. By the said order, the Minister has stayed the order of Assistant Registrar passed under section 78 of the M.C.S. Act, 1960. Mr. Borkar, learned counsel pointed out that the term of managing committee of respondent no.3 society is due to expire this year. He also submitted that despite repeated efforts and srp -: 2 :- requests the said revision is not being taken up for hearing. Mr. Borkar therefore restricted this writ petition to prayer clause (c), i.e., direction to respondent no.16-Minister to dispose of revision in a time bound schedule. Learned AGP submitted that he has no objection if such a direction is issued. In the light of this fact situation, writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent no.16 to decide the revision preferred by respondent nos. 5 to 15 as expeditiously as possible and at any rate not later than 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Writ petition stands disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.)