IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2011 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1933 RP.No. 415 of 2011(B) --------------------- AGAINST THE INTERIM ORDER IN WPC.11217/2011 Dated 07/04/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER :- -------------------------------------------------------- ST.RITA'S HOSPITAL, NALUKODY, CHANGANASSERY, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, FR.JOSEPH MUTTATI. BY ADV. SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS :- ------------------------------------------------ 1. EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, KOTTAYAM-686 001. 2. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, ERNAKULAM – 682 030. 3. ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYANISHI BHAVAN, KOTTAYAM-686 001. 4. REGISTRAR, KERALA NURSES' AND MIDWIVES COUNCIL, RED CROSS ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 037. BY ADV. SRI.N.REGHURAJ THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: jvt RP.No. 415 of 2011 APPENDIX Annexure A1 :- Order dtd.8.1.2010 in A.T.A.No.14(7)2010 of the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal. //True Copy// P.A. to Judge P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ---------------------------------- R.P.No. 415 OF 2011 In W.P(C)NO.11217 OF 2011 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of June, 2011 O R D E R This review petition is filed seeking a review of the interim order passed by me on 07.04.2011 in W.P(C)No.11217 of 2011 whereby I stayed recovery pursuant to the order impugned in the writ petition subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit the sum of Rs.25,000/- within two weeks from the date of the order, subject to the outcome of the writ petition. It is contended that such an order happened to be passed for the reason that the petitioner did not bring to the notice of this Court that the petitioner had already deposited 40% of the amount demanded by the respondents as a condition for grant of stay by the Appellate Tribunal and therefore, the direction issued by this Court to deposit the sum of Rs.25,000/- may be recalled. It is contented that if in addition to the sum of Rs.30,273/- deposited pursuant to the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal, the petitioner is called upon to deposit the sum of Rs.25,000/- also, it would be an onerous condition and R.P.No. 415 OF 2011 In W.P(C)NO.11217 OF 2011 2 that thereby the petitioner would be depositing approximately 73% of the total amount demanded. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that in the light of the conditional order passed by the Appellate Tribunal, which was complied with, the respondent has no objection to the condition stipulated in the interim order passed on 07.04.2011 in the writ petition being lifted. I accordingly allow the review petition and vacate the stipulation in the order dated 07.04.2011 in W.P(C)No.11217 of 2011 regarding deposit of the sum of Rs.25,000/-. In other words, the interim order passed in the writ petition will be unconditional. P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE dmb