N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAT‘TRGARH AT Rn qpu 1 p V WritpétitiQn[SlNoQ?%a201o S‘NGL£ EEmnz V PETITIONER : - v Smt Archana Das Valshnav W/o Shrl ' . Ajay Kumar Das Valshnav aged about K ~ 39 years Posted as Sh1ksha Karrm \O \,\\)\ .' -» O Grade II at Govt Mlddle School P1par1a WDlstt Kablrdham (CG) Versus RESPONDENTS : 1f State of‘Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Kablrdham [C (I 4] Block educatlon Offlrer Block Kawardha Dlstt— Kablrdham (CG) ‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER'A‘RTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION “b OF INDIA 'LM a Education D K S Bhawan Raipur The Secretary, Panchayat D K S Bhawan Sachlvalaya Pamur [C G , Dlstrlct Educatwn ‘ HIGH OOURT OF WHATTISGAR AT BILASPUR i BB HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITI'NKFR DIWAKFR W.P.[S) N0. 6784-]20 10 pmi'r’mmk > Smt. Amhana Das Vaishnav Versus mi’onnm'rs ‘ State of C.G. an‘ Oers th x r wm'r Pmmon UNDER mom 226 or THE eons'rrmmon OF mmA 'Y ' Shri Ashok Vaishnav, counsel for the peiitioner. Shri Vaibhav Gaverdhan, P.L. for the State. 01mm ‘ (25.11.2010) Griovance of the petitioner in this. petition is, that mmally she appointed as Contact Teacher Grade and thereafter as Shiksha / ' au but she 1s not bemg perm1tted§ to appear for the post of Head ater on the gmund that she do not have the expenence of seven yeaxs as $h1ksha Karm1. 2. Connsel for the respondents] State submits that now the ‘ goVnment has taken a decision to pe 't all those Shiksha Karmis o have the expenmce of seven years elther on the post of Contract Teaer or on the post of Shlksha Karmi and themfore, there remains othmg 1n the pmsent petmon He has shown the letter dated 1 1 2010 1ssued by the Dnector Pubhc Instructlons, Rmpur ddssed to the Advocate General Copy of the said letter has been M en to Shn Vmshnav also and he 1s sanshed wtth the same unsel tor the petmoner submlts that the exammatlon for the post of head Inaster is scheduled for 28.112010 8r. 29.11.2010 and as the 3 tit r a i peioner! is apprehending that she may not be permitted to appea ' ~ the same a dnecuon may be 1ssued to the competent authonty to t him to appear m the sa1d emmmauon H was Krn Ms wh er ch n 9 1 are \ glv Co 1n pe l 3. ‘ {State counsel submits that the applehension of the petitioner is pmémature and if she has duly mm! in the application form, the authority concerned would act pumuant to the decision taken by the State gGovemment vide letter dated 19. 11.20 10. ’ ‘ l 4. :In the facts and circumstances of the case, as nothing sulvives in the petition, it is disposed of With a d' tion to the competent authority to permit the petitioner'to appeai; in the examination t0 be held on 28 11 2010 & 29 11 2010 for {he post of Head Master pursuant to the decmion taken by the $tate Government subject to the venhcanon of the fact that the petmoner has Iiiled m her form and the same has been duly accepted by the authority concerned. If the grievance of the petitioner still sumves, she would be at liberty to approach this Court l Sd/- ‘1 A. ' Pritinker’ Diwaker \x L Judge ’ x,