“ N‘$ <\? ’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR P (S) NO. f Guleshwar Das Vaishnav, S/o. Late Gokul Das Vaishnav, aged about 48 years, R/o. Village Basula, Post Khaprikhurd, Tahsil & District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) (C.G.) 3] / / 4] u u Q$ /2010 VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Deputy Secretary, District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Director, Public Education, Directorate, Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) Tirth Kurnar Suryavani, Assistant Grade- II, Govt. Kisan Higher Secondary School, Karamtala, Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) TITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER RESPONDENTS W. WRIT PE IN THE HON HIGH COURT OF CHHAI‘TISGARH %f BELASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 4468 of2$10 Guleshwm' Das Vaishnav. VERSUS State Qf’Chhattisgarh & Others. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRKT PE’H’HON UNDER AR’l'ICLE 226 OF THE CGNSTXTU‘EEON OF INDIA 533: Hoxx’bie Siu'i Satis§1 K; Agnjiion'i. J. Present: Amit Shri Shri P.K.B-haduxi;Parxel Manoi ?aranive Advomte Laxg'ériaiiihe iox Lhe petmoner Sige/resglmndeni N0. 1 to 4. Ukim‘a (QRAL) (Passed . “A“ Ar +‘Jum, 2011) m m wy Q; Laamed counsai appearmg for the State/respondents submits that the petitioner has already contimled at the original place ofposting for more ihan ten mouths 0n account of interim order granted by this Court 12.08.2010. The State/raspondents may bo granted iiberty to pass apyropriate orders keeping in View public interest and admmistrative exigency. Shri Bhaduri further submits that the State/respondents shalt not insist upon compliance ofthe impugneé order dated 05.08.2010 Qumexure P/l) in respect ofthe petitioner. At this stage, when 11o effect could be given to the impugned order detect 05.08.2010 (Annexme 13/1) on account ofthe interim order datett 12.G8.2010, thus, it iS not necessary to go into legality and validity ofthe a'forestated impugned order. a In View of the above, according to iearneti counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. interim relief granted on 12.08.20 10 is vacatedf Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sd/—