IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.525 of 2008 RAM SUNDAR RAM SON OF LATE NEMI RAM --- PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. LACHIYA DEVI W/O RAM SUNDAR RAM -- OPP.PARTIES. ----------- 03 24.09.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner, while assailing the impugned order by which the ad interim maintenance in the sum of Rs. 700/- (Seven hundred) has been directed to be paid to the applicant/opposite party no.2, submits that the petitioner has not adequate income. Since the issue is open to be agitated in the Court below itself, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order impugned. However, petitioner is at liberty to raise/agitate all these grounds/facts in the Court below and support them by adequate evidence which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)