$-44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1088/2011 & Crl.MA 4021/2011 (stay) PRADEEP KUMAR & ORS Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri,APP for Statewith Insp. RakeshKumar Mr. Avnish, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER % 04.04.2011 This is a petition for quashing FIR No.l40 of 2010 under Sections 308/506/342/120B/34IPG registeredat police stationBawana at the instance of complainant/ Respondent no.2 herein. As per the complainantMr. Vikas, he was marriedto the daughterof Petitioner No.4 and to settle the matrimonial disputes which had arisen between the parties, he was called at the residence of Petitioner No.4 Shri Naresh Kumar. When he reached there. Petitioner No.1 took him to other place and there the Petitionersassaultedhim resultingin the registrationof Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified abovementioned FIR. After investigation charge-sheet was filed and the case is pending trial. In the interregnum,the parties appeared before the Delhi Govt. Mediation Centre where they have amicably resolved their disputes. As per the terms of settlement,the partiesi.e. Mr. Vikas and Ms. Renu, daughterof PetitionerNo.4 who is also presentin the Court today, will seek divorce by mutual consent. Ms. Renu has also withdrawn her complaintagainstthe RespondentNo.2 and his familymemberbeforeCAW Cell, Outer District, Delhi. The compromisebetweenthe partieshas been placed on record as Annexure-P-3. The RespondentNo.2 states that since the partieshave amicablysettledtheir disputes and Ms. Renu, daughterof Petitioner No.4 has withdrawn the complaint filed by her at CAW Cell, Outer District,Delhi and has also agreed to seek divorce by mutual consent, he does not want to pursue the abovementionedFIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. The Petitioners and Ms. Renu who are present in person are identified by their counsel. They state that the complaintfiled by Ms. Renu at CAW Cell, Outer District against Respondent No.2 and his family members has been withdrawn, Ms. Renu will fully cooperate in getting the divorce by mutual consent as agreed between the parties and thus, it would be in the interest of justice if the abovementionedFIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto are quashed. The parties have amicably resolvedtheir disputes of their own free will, volitionand withoutany coercion,the pendencyofthe presentFIR and the proceedingspursuanttheretowill only straintheirrelationsfurther.Since there is no legal impedimentin quashing the abovementionedFIR, FIR No.140 of 2010 under Sections 308/506/342/120B/34 IPG registered at police station Bawana and the proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. The parties and Ms. Renu, daughterof the PetitionerNo.4 who are identified by their respective counsels have signed the order-sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made. The petition and the applicationstand disposedof. Dasti. APRIL 04,2011 d \J (A . -VU-9^\ 5^ v>-) ^ MUKTA GUPTA,J /