1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL WRIT No. 6235 of 2006 SMT.TULSI BAI & ORS. V/S B.O.R.,AJMER & ORS. Mr. KR SARAN for Mr. SAJJAN SINGH, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 4.1.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- It has been found by the learned courts below that the petitioner was served, and had entered appearance through Advocate Shri Har Govind Bhatt. Thereafter written statement was not filed despite giving number of opportunities, on 19.6.65 the matter was ordered to proceed exparte. Then, at the request of the petitioner vide order dt. 10.10.95 the proceedings were ordered to proceed bi- partite on the cost of Rs. 150/-. Thereafter again the defendant absented, and also did not deposit the cost as well, and therefore, the matter was again ordered to proceed exparte on 18.3.1996, and was decreed on 30.12.1996. The contention raised before me was that the petitioner did not engage any counsel, and she was mislead by some clerk of a lawyer. Suffice it to say that admittedly no action has been taken against the person who 2 appeared as advocate before the Bar Council, and the learned courts below have not believed this version. In my view, the findings do not require any interference in my writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/