1 WP 3575/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3575 OF 2010 Biryas Hoteliers & Consultant Pvt.Ltd. ..Petitioner vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ...Respondents Shri Chandra Naik for the Petitioner. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 7, 2010 P.C. :- 1 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2 The petitioner has filed L.C.Suit No. 1235/2006 challenging notice issued under Section 55 of the MRTP Act. In 2009, he moved an application for amendment in the plaint to show that during the pendency of the suit, occupiers had decided to redevelop the property and redevelopment application 2 WP 3575/2010 has been submitted to the competent authority. The trial court rejected chamber summons which is filed for amendment holding that these subsequent developments are not relevant for deciding the validity of the notice under Section 55. 3 I find no reason to interfere in the said order. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed. The petitioner may, however, produce documents and the documents may be admitted in evidence if the trial court finds them relevant for deciding the suit. (J.H. BHATIA, J.)