:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 29 OF 2005 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 29 OF 2005 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 29 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3509 OF 2004 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3509 OF 2004 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3509 OF 2004 M/s. Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co.Ltd .....Plffs. vs. M/s. Geekay Electronics and ors. .....Defnds. Rafia Peermohammed i/b. Universal Legal for the plaintiffs. Cyrus Ardeshir a/w. D.R. Mehta i/b. Dhru Liladhar and Co. for the defendants. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 18th October, 2005. P.C. :. 1. The present suit is filed on Statement of account which is not confirmed by the defendant. On the contrary on the correspondence the defendant confirms that the accounts are required to be :2: reconciled. The claim on the foot of the account is not maintainable as summary suit. In view thereof unconditional leave to defend. 2. Suit is transferred to the list of Commercial Causes. Written statement or points of defence to be filed four weeks from today. Affidavits, list of documents to be filed within four weeks thereafter. Inspection within four weeks thereafter. Suit to be on board of the learned Judge taking Commercial Causes. ************