CRM No. M-12604 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-12604 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.05.2009 Ashok ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. Rajan Gupta, J. This petition for anticipatory bail has been preferred by Ashok son of Randhir in a case registered against him under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 341, 452, 506, 307 IPC, vide FIR No.135 dated 9th April, 2009 at Police Station Narnaund, District Hisar. The allegations against the petitioner are that he inflicted an axe blow on the head of one Sanjay in the occurrence which took place on 9th April, 2009. Remaining assailants caused lathi and danda injuries to others. The motive of the occurrence is stated to be suspicion of illicit relation of Ashok with wife of one Kalmi. Learned counsel for the petitioner has mainly argued that after the occurrence, a compromise has been arrived at between the parties. He has referred to affidavits, Annexures P-3 to P-6 in this regard. CRM No. M-12604 of 2009 2 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and given careful thought to the facts of the case. It is apparent that the injury attracting the offence under Section 307 IPC has been attributed to the petitioner namely Ashok. The factum of compromise can be of no avail in a case under Section 307 IPC. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any ground for extending the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The present petition is thus dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE May 29, 2009 'rajpal'