IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29487 of 2010 1. DHARMVEER PASWAN 2. DHARM RAJ PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 22.12.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Forty five kilogram of sweet supari and fifty kilogram of Talab Gutkha in gunny mat with railway mark are recovered from petitioners’ house. Defence is about having no concern with seized articles and none recovery of those items from their house on the ground of affidavit sworn by seizure list’s witnesses appears a clear case of tampering with witnesses. Otherwise, they were present at the place of occurrence and made signature over seizure list. Accordingly, the prayer of petitioners for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)