IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM Nos.13325-26-CI of 2010 in/and RFA No.5317 of 2010 Date of Decision:04.08.2011 Sham Lal & Ors. ....appellants Versus The State of Haryana & anr. .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellants Mr.Ashish Gupta, AAG Haryana *** RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J.(ORAL): This is claimants' appeal challenging the impugned award dated 21.07.2010 passed by reference Court, Karnal, on the ground that compensation awarded by the reference Court is inadequate. An application has been filed by the appellants stating that the instant appeal is covered by a judgment of this Court in RFA No.2647 of 1994 decided on 08.02.2010 tilted as Virender Singh vs. State of Hayrana & Ors. Upon notice of this application, Mr.Ashish Gupta, AAG Haryana, appeared on behalf of State of Haryana and has very fairly submitted that the present appeal is covered by the aforesaid decision. Keeping in view the stand taken by the parties, this appeal is taken on Board and is disposed of in terms of RFA No.2647 of 1994 decided on 08.02.2010 tilted as Virender Singh vs. State of Hayrana & Ors. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 04.08.2011 neenu