:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 822 OF 2008 SUMMONS NO. 822 OF 2008 SUMMONS NO. 822 OF 2008 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 4125 OF NO. 4125 OF NO. 4125 OF 1997 1997 1997 Jalil Mohamedali Mehdiyan. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Mohamedali Khalooi Tafti & Ors. ... Defendants. Mr. Rajeev Ravi i/b. M/s. Bilawala & Co. for the Plaintiff. Mr. Deepak Naik, representative of Defendant No.6 present. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 24TH 24TH 24TH MARCH 2009. MARCH 2009. MARCH 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . It is stated that this Chamber Summons is duly served on all parties as is evident by the affidavit proving service which is already taken on record. The Chamber Summons is to amend the plaint so as to bring on record the Respondents. According to the Plaintiffs, they are the legal heirs and representatives of the deceased Defendant No.2, who expired as is evident by the contents of para 4 of the affidavit in support, on 28th December 2007. 2. The reasons for the delay are also explained. There is no affidavit in reply although, all parties are duly served. The Chamber Summons is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). Costs to be paid to Defendant No.6, quantified at Rs.1,500/-, within a period of two weeks from today. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)