IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 13 of 2011 Date of decision: 22.11.2011 Ali Mohammad …..Petitioner Versus Srikant Baldi & Anr. …..Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K.Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. Sanjay Karol, J. (Oral) This Court, in terms of judgment dated 1.4.2010 passed in CWP No. 4592 of 2009 titled as Ali Mohammad vs. State of H.P. & Ors., issued following directions:- “It is seen from the reply furnished by the Director Sainik Welfare, Himachal Pradesh that the petitioner already had one re-employment after his discharge from the Army and he can be considered for higher job only after he obtains ‘no objection certificate’ from the Department concerned and registers his name again as fresh candidate in the nearest employment exchange for higher job. Therefore, it is for the petitioner to do the needful in view of the reply furnished by the Director Sainik Welfare, Himachal Pradesh, in which case the matter will be properly processed by the Authority concerned. The Writ Petition is disposed of.” …2… 2. According to the petitioner, same have not been complied with in letter and spirit. Hence, present petition for initiation of proceedings under provisions of Contempt of Courts Act is filed. 3. In the reply, respondents have clarified that for the year 2008, no candidate, registered with the State Ex-Servicemen Cell, Hamirpur, was considered for appointment as JBT, for the reason that no requisition was sent by the Director Sainik Welfare, H.P., Hamirpur. Only names of such candidates were considered who had passed two year JBT training course from various DIETs of the State. These candidates were selected for the training through a common entrance test conducted by the H.P. Board of School Education with 15% reservation to Ex-Serviceman for undergoing two years JBT training course from various DIETs of the State. 4. In this view of the matter, it cannot be said that there has been any willful disobedience or violation of the judgment passed by this Court, as petitioner’s request was only for consideration for appointment to the post of JBT on batch-wise basis during the year 2008 against the post reserved for Ex-Servicemen category. It cannot be said that there is any willful disobedience of the judgment passed by this Court. As such, the contempt petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. November 22, 2011 (Justice Sanjay Karol), (rana) Judge.