IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 15651 of 2008 Between: 1 S.Balakrishna Reddy S/o.Raghava Reddy Gummadidadla(V) Jinnaram(M) Medak District 2 S.Prabhakar Reddy S/o.Chandra Reddy Gummadidadla(V) Jinnaram(M) Medak District 3 R.Bhaskar Reddy S/o.Venkat Reddy Gummadidadla(V) Jinnaram(M) Medak District 4 P.Vishnuvardhan Reddy S/o.Ram Reddy Gummadidadla(V) Jinnaram(M) Medak District ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The District Collector Medak District at Sanga Reddy 2 The Tahsildar Jinnaram (M) Medak District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ,order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the 2nd respondent is not aﬀecting mutation and issuing pattadar passbooks and title deed in respect of land in Sy.No.464 ademeasuring ac.0-15 Gts and Sy.No.494 admeasuring acr 2-15 Gts toral admeasuring Ac 2-30 Gts under a registered sale deed document No.1303/2007 situated at Gummadidala (V) Jinn ram(M) Medak District with consequential direction to Second respondent to issue pattadar pass book and title deed by mutating the petitioners names in the revenue records to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.MANOHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.15651 OF 2008 ORAL ORDER: The petitioners state that they made representations dated 08.03.2007 and 31.03.2008 requesting the second respondent, namely, the Tahsildar, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District, to mutate their names in the revenue records and issue pattadar pass books and title deeds in their names in respect of the lands in question but so far no action thereon had been taken. Hence, they filed the present writ petition. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioners have to make proper application in Form VI(A) as contemplated under Rule 18 of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Rules, 1989 read with Section 4(1) of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 to the second respondent-Tahsildar, and if any such application is made, the second respondent shall certainly consider the same. Since the petitioners are said to have not made application in the prescribed form, both the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue agreed for disposal of the writ petition itself at the stage of admission with the following directions: The petitioners shall make proper application in Form VI(A) as contemplated under Rule 18 of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Rules, 1989 read with Section 4(1) of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 for mutation of their names in the revenue records and for issuance of the pattadar pass books and title deeds in their favour in respect of the lands in question to the second respondent- namely, the Tahsildar, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District, along with the relevant documents and if any such application is made, the second respondent shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J. Date: 22.07.2008. VGSR