1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 3 OF 2007 IN PETITION NO. 185 OF 2006 Paul Ratan Aloysius Pinto. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Thomas L. Pareira & Ors. ... Defendants. None for the Plaintiff. Mr. Ibrahim Merchant i/b. K.V. Aiyar & Assoc. for the Defendants. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 9th DECEMBER 2009. P.C. :- The Plaintiff and the Advocate was absent on 25th November 2009 and 2nd December 2009 but on 2nd December 2009, the Plaintiff’s Advocate appeared and stated that the matter is settled. It was clarified on that day itself that if the Plaintiff does not appear today or his Advocate is absent, the Suit will be dismissed for want of prosecution. 2. None is present to report as to what has happened after the matter appeared earlier. Although, the caveat is duly served so also the affidavit in support, no steps are taken for the past nearly three years to have the issues settled. The Suit is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)