IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6798 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 18.12.2009 Rajat Bhatia .....Petitioner versus Smt.Kulwinder Kaur and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Bikramjit Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Saurav Khurana, Advocate, for the respondents. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed by the plaintiff, whose application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC was dismissed by the trial Court vide order dated 17.5.2008, which has been further upheld by the Additional District Judge, Amritsar, vide the impugned judgment dated 2.9.2008. The ad-interim injunction was sought in a suit for permanent injunction filed by the petitioner-plaintiff to restrain the respondent- defendants from alienating, mortgaging, selling, leasing out, letting out and/or transferring the suit property bearing S.C.O.No.53, District C.R. No.6798 of 2009 (O&M) 2 Shopping Complex, Ranjit Avenue, Amritsar. After hearing learned counsel for the parties at some length and on perusal of the impugned orders, I am of the consideration view that no interference with the impugned orders is called for by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction, also for the reason that any transaction(s) in relation to the property in dispute, at the instance of the respondents, would be governed by the doctrine of lis-pendens. Disposed of. Dasti. 18-12-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE