IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30476 of 2011(H) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. MOHAMMED JASEEM, AGED 23, S/O.NISSAR AHAMED, KADUNGATTU PARAMBIL HOUSE, ETTUMANA, P.O.KARUVANNUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. SAMEER.P., PARAPPAN HOUSE, PATHIRIYAL P.O.,MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. ABDUL RAZIK N.K., AGED 23, S/O.MOIDUNNY N.K., NALAKATH KALLINGAL HOUSE, KADIRIYA ROAD, EDAKKAZHIYUR P.O. CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI(PARIYARATH) RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENJIPPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 505. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENJIPPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 505. 3. I.E.S.COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, CHITTILAPPALLY, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 001. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, S.C. FOR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VPV WPCNO.30476/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 2/11/2011. P2: COPY OF THE CHELAN RECEIPT OF THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 2/11/2011. P3: COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 2/11/2011. P4: COPY OF THE CHELAN RECEIPT OF THE 2ND PETIITIONER DATED 2/11/2011. P5: COPY OF THE REVALUATION APPLICATION OF THE 3RD PETITIONER DATED 2/11/2011. P6: COPY OF THE CHELAN RECEIPT OF THE 3RD PETITIONER DATED 2/11/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE VPV ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 30476 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the IV Semester examination was declared, they had failed in one paper. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge