IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.140 of 2011 SUJAL SAGAR . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 05 02.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Nobody appears on behalf of the State. Petitioner who is declared juvenile in conflict with law seeks bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Sections 366A and 376 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no murky past of the petitioner. The girl has been assessed aged between 18 to 19 years. Going by her statement made under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. it cannot be deciphered that she was subjected to rape at the hands of the petitioner. It is submitted that the father of the petitioner will take entire responsibility respecting the petitioner in case he is released on bail. It is next highlighted that he is in remand home/custody since 17.07.2010 A report from the concerned Probation Officer was called for which is placed on record at Flag-‘A’. It appears therefrom that the petitioner has well knit family and there is no criminal antecedent of the petitioner or any one in the family. Considering the submissions and the facts disclosed in the report at Flag-A, this Court, while setting aside the impugned orders, directs release of the petitioner, named above, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board, Patna in connection with Juvenile Justice Board case no. 286 of 2010, arising out of Parsa 2 Bazar P.S. case no. 94 of 2010, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be the father of the petitioner. (ii) It shall be the duty of the father of the petitioner to monitor the conduct/behaviour of the petitioner and to produce him before the Court in person as and when directed therefor. This Court grants liberty to the father to approach the Court for cancellation of bail if the father finds himself unable to control the petitioner. In case of default in physical appearance on the date(s) specially fixed therefor, the trial Court shall also be at liberty to cancel the bail bond(s) of the petitioner. (iii) During subsistency of the privilege of bail if the petitioner is found involved in any other criminal case, the same shall be treated as a breach of the condition entailing cancellation of bail. Sym (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)