IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39546 of 2009 1. Surendra Singh @ Surendra Nath Singh, son of Sadhu Singh, 2. Nimish Narayan Singh, son of Surendra Nath Singh, 3. Durgesh Kumar Singh, son of Nimish Narayan Singh, all of village Sisgarh, PS Rajpur, district Buxar – petitioners. Vs. The State of Bihar. 2 12.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners have challenged the order, dated 29.6.2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Buxar in Tr.No.1227/2009, G.R. No. 274/2007 arising out of Rajpur PS Case No. 29/2007 by which the Magistrate has taken cognizance for the offences under sections 447, 341, 323 and 307 of the Penal Code and 27, Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the dispute arose with respect to a piece of land over which the informant wants to ply his tractor. It is said that the allegation that petitioner no.2 fired and injured the informant is not supported by the injury report. It is further said that the only injury is swelling etc. It is submitted that the nature of the injury is simple. The injury report is not annexed with this application. In the circumstances the petitioners would be at liberty to produce the injury report, if any, to indicate to the court below that the injuries are simple in nature and that no case is made out under section307 of the Penal Code at the time of framing of the charge. This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)