IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Review Petition (Ld) No. 59 of 2001 in Writ Petition No. 323 of 1988. William Terence Rego ..Petitioner vs. 1. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & Anr. ..Respondents Petitioner in person. Mr.M.D.Siodia with Mr.D.S.Retiwala for respondent. CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.A.BOBDE JJ S.A.BOBDE JJ S.A.BOBDE JJ 22nd September,2005 22nd September,2005 22nd September,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . We have heard the petitioner who is appearing in person and Mr.Siodia for respondent. . We do not see any ground to review the order. Review petition is dismissed. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Notice of Motion No. 39 of 2002 in Review Petition (Ld) No. 59 of 2001 in Writ Petition No. 323 of 1988. William Terence Rego ..Petitioner vs. 1. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & Anr. ..Respondents Petitioner in person. Mr.M.D.Siodia with Mr.D.S.Retiwala for respondent. CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.A.BOBDE JJ S.A.BOBDE JJ S.A.BOBDE JJ 22nd September,2005 22nd September,2005 22nd September,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . We have heard the petitioner who is appearing in person and Mr.Siodia for respondent. . Delay in filing the review petition is condoned. Review Petition is taken up for hearing forthwith.