IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2732 of 2007 SURYADEO PRASAD GUPTA @ SURYAD . Versus PAWAN KUMAR & ORS . ----------- 2/ 28/07/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties. It is submitted from the show cause, more particularly at Annexure-A that the holding tax is required to be paid at the old rate till the year-2003-04. The earlier decision enhancing it from 1997-98 had been recalled and payments could be made at the old rate till the year-2003-04. That disposes of the contempt application. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any enhancement of the holding tax afresh by the municipality in the year 2004- 05 his remedy lies in a freshly constituted writ application to assail the same in accordance with law. The contempt application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)