THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.18956 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the 5th respondent to take appropriate action in Crime No.205 of 2008, and also on the complaint dated 22.05.2008 lodged by the 1st petitioner. There is no necessity of going into all the details. In the counter affidavit filed by the 4th respondent, at paragraphs 5, 6 and 7, it is stated as under: “I further respectfully submit that the investigation so far made did not strengthen the allegations of complainant Smt.M.Tulasi (2nd petitioner herein). There are variations between the statements of complainant- 2nd petitioner and her husband Mr.Yougandhar Reddy (victim). The complainant informed that Mr.Balraj Constable of Saroornagar Police Station visited her house, took her husband, then her husband disappeared, though he kidnapped him. But, the victim Mr.Yougandhar Reddy disclosed that on 29.6.2008 evening at about 4.30 p.m. when he was present at curd shop at Zakir Hussain Colony X Road, he received about the visit of Saroornagar Constable and he informed to him that he would visit police station along with Advocate Mr.Sravan Kumar. He visited his house, took his scooter and on the way to his Advocate’s house, near Sisumandir School, Saraswathinagar Colony between 4.30 and 5 p.m. five unknown persons came in one maroon colour Tata Sumo, two persons got down from the vehicle and stopped him and said that he had lodged case against Mr. Venkatesh and insisted to withdraw the same, meanwhile two more persons got down from vehicle and all of them forcibly took him into Sumo. It is further disclosed in the investigation that the victim Mr.Yougandhar Reddy had received minor injuries over his body, beaten by unknown persons with an unknown instrument over his shirt. On keen observation, the victim shirt torn on several places but none of the places got any blood stain, all are seems to be torn without wearing on body. On careful perusal of the victim’s minor injuries, it is clear that they may be self- inflicted or got inflicted on half bear body. Investigating is pending for want of collection of some more evidence. No prima facie is established as of now against the accused persons named in the FIR committed the offence punishable U/sec.363 IPC. Necessary action will be initiated against the responsible persons who committed the offence depending on the evidence adduced during the course of investigation. I assure this Hon’ble Court that all possible steps are being taken to complete the investigation and file an appropriate report/charge sheet before the concerned Hon’ble Court at the earliest. I respectfully submit that most of the allegations made in the affidavit are the subject matter of investigation in Cr.No.205/2008 U/sec.363 IPC for which a detailed investigation is going on. I respectfully submit that the petitioner made allegations against one Mr.P.Venkateshwarlu on whom the husband of the 2nd petitioner filed Suit against him in O.S.No.1043/2008 but not made him as party respondent to this writ petition. After careful perusal of the affidavit, it appears that the intention of the petitioner in filing the present writ petition is indirectly pressurize the police to initiate action against the police officials who registered a case against the husband of the 2nd petitioner herein in Cr.No.777/2008 U/sec.3 (x) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 on the file of the Saroornagar Police Station. Zig Zag allegations are made by the petitioner in the entire affidavit and the petitioner herself put to strict proof of the same since they are only to divert the attention of the investigation officers. I submit that both the crimes ie., Cr.No.777/2008 U/sec.3 (X) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 registered against the husband of the 2nd petitioner herein, namely, Mr.Yougandhar Reddy and Cr.No.205/2008 lodged by the 2nd petitioner herein are pending investigation. Investigation is going on in both the crimes on correct lines. Hence the writ petition is devoid of any merits.” In view of the stand taken by the 4th respondent in the counter affidavit filed by him, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, directing the respondent police to complete the investigation in Crime No.205 of 2008 on the file of Saidabad Police Station, Hyderabad, as expeditiously as possible, if not already completed, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and take appropriate steps as required under law. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 28.10.2010 v v