IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29104 of 2009 1. BANGALI SAH 2. Lallan Sah Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 12.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Complainant’s son allegedly was taken by the petitioners to Haldawani, who did not return, though petitioners came back. For this, submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that complainant’s son is still working there as a labourer. Due to some differences on the point of transaction of money, this case is lodged, for which earlier a case was also lodged on behalf of the petitioners. A report called for from the concerned Police Station by the Court below. From perusal of the report, it appears that differences are prevailing in between the parties even subsisting up till now. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 894-C of 2006, Trial No. 2535 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri K.P. Singh, J.M., Ist Class, Bettiah, West Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)