IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 10TH MARCH 2008 / 20TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 7912 of 2008(P) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ M.M.BIJU ,S/O.MATHUNNI, AGED 29 MANGAI HOUSE, MANKUTTIPADAM, PADI P.O.,KODALI TRICHUR PIN 680 699. BY ADV. SRI.PAUL JACOB SRI.PEARL K.DAVIS SRI.I.K.RAJU SRI.K.M.AJITH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SECRETARY,MATTATHOUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT PADI P.O., KODAKARA (VIA) TRICHUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT,HEALTH CENTRE MATTATHOUR PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, PADI P.O. (VIA) KODAKARA TRICHUR DISTRICT. 3. DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER OF HELATH (D.M.O.) TRICHUR. 4. CHEIF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD POOMKUNNAM, TRICHUR. 5. SREEDHARAN S/O.KRISHNAN,CHOOLACKAL MANKUTTIPADAM,PADI P.O.,KODALI, TRICHUR (DIST) PIN 680 6999. 6. RAJESH,S/O.PARAMESWARAM POTHIYLE,MAMUTTIPADAM, PADI P.O.,KODALI,TRICHUR (DIST). 7. RAJAN,S/O.KUMARAN CHOOLACKAL, MANKUTTIPADAM, PADI P.O.,KODALI,TRICHUR (DIST). R2-R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR R4 BY ADV.MR.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.7912 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 10th March, 2008 JUDGMENT The grievance voiced by the petitioner is that the 1st respondent-Panchayat is about to issue a licence to respondents 5 to 7 ignoring Ext.P1 complaint submitted by him before the Secretary of the Panchayat, Exts.P2 and P3 complaints submitted before the Public Health Authorities and also Ext.P4 complaint submitted before the Pollution Control Board. I do not propose to go into the merits of the matter. According to the petitioner, the 1st respondent is yet to issue any licence to respondents 5 to 7 for the proposed poultry farm. I dispose of the Writ Petition directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P1 complaint along with the application for licence, if any, submitted by respondents 5 to 7 and take a decision on the licence application only after hearing the petitioner also. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE