IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 19TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 36932 of 2003(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.SRIDHARAN THAMPI, T.C.49/228, VANIYATH LANE,MUDAVANMUGHAL,POOJAPURA.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 012. RETIRED AS MANAGER, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA,PATTOOR BRANCH, ALLEPPEY DISTRICT, COCHIN REGIONAL OFFICE OF KERALA. BY ADV. K.SRIDHARAN THAMPI(PARTY IN PERSON) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, CENTRAL OFFICE, CHANDERMUKHI,NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAIR-400021. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER (PRS),CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, CENTRAL OFFICE, CHANDERMUKHI, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI-400021. 3. THE CHIEF MANAGER (PRS), CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, CENTRAL OFFICE, CHANDERMUKHI, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI-400021. 4. THE CHIEF MANAGER (PRS). CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE, 48/49, MONTIETH ROAD, CHENNAI-600008. 5. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL OFFICE, GEO TOWERS, PALLIMUKKU, KOCHI-682 016. ADV. SRI.V.V.SIDHARTHAN FOR R1 TO 5 SRI.M.L.ABRAHAM FOR R1 TO 5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.36932 of 2003 ================== Dated this the 10th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T In this writ petition I passed the following order on 30.9.2010, which is self-explanatory. “Since the petitioner is appearing as party in person, the Registry shall inform the petitioner that the writ petition is posted for hearing to 18.10.10, and if he so wishes, he may argue the case on that day. Post on 18.10.10 (Hearing list).” On 18.10.2010, since notice was not yet issued, I directed the Registry to issue notice to the party informing about the date of posting. Pursuant thereto, notice issued to the petitioner, who is appearing as party-in-person, was returned with the endorsement “unclaimed”. That shows that despite intimation being given from the post office to the petitioner, he refused to take delivery of the same. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge