WPMS No. 1074 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. B.S. Adhikari, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Rawat, Advocate on behalf of Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder for the State. The suit was dismissed on the ground that the petitioners has an efficacious alternate remedy of filing an appeal before the Collector u/s 11 of the Kumaun and Garhwal Water (Collection, Retention and Distribution) Act, 1975. The petitioners, being aggrieved by the dismissal of the suit, preferred a revision u/s 115 of the C.P.C. which was also dismissed and, consequently, the present writ petition has been filed challenging the aforesaid two orders. In the first instance, a revision against the dismissal of the suit filed u/s 115 of the C.P.C. was not maintainable. Against the dismissal of the suit, only an appeal would lie u/s 96 of the C.P.C. Consequently, on this score, the writ petition before this court is not maintainable. Further the Court finds from a perusal of the impugned order of the trial court that the suit was rightly dismissed. Since the petitioners had an efficacious statutory remedy by filing an appeal under the aforesaid Act of 1975, this Court does not find any palpable error in the impugned orders passed by the trial court. The writ petition is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 07.07.2010 Shiv