S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 4164/2006 (Jai Ram @ Vajja & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan) DATE OF ORDER : 10/10/2006 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Shambhoo Singh for the petitioners. Mr. V.R.Mehta, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and public prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned as also the police investigation diary. The petitioners No. 1 and 2 have been named in the FIR, however, the petitioner No.3 though not named in the FIR, but the witnesses namely Kalu, Vishma, Ambava, Smt. Sambhudi and Smt. Panki in their statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. categorically stated that petitioner No.3 Shankar Gameti was also along with the accused and committed the offence alleged. In the circumstances, therefore, I do not consider it a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the bail application filed by the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is rejected. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP