IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11470 of 2008 Decided on 1.4.2011 Rajesh Kumar ……….Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. ...….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: None . For the respondents : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The case was taken up in the morning session, however, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Thereafter, the case has been taken up again at 2.35 p.m., but neither the petitioner is present in person nor represented by any Advocate. 2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed for non- prosecution, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge April 1, 2011 (hl) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.