IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2217 of 2008 SUMITRA DEVI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2/ 24/09/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has acknowledged to have been removed from the daily wage post in the District Jail (Mandal Kara), Supaul on 10.11.2006. This Court therefore cannot direct her reinstatement. If the vacancy is still available and the petitioner represents, this Court expects the same to be considered sympathetically in view of her claim for having worked from 1996 on daily wages. If the vacancy is permanent, this Court certainly expects the respondents to fill up the same permanently in accordance with law. It is equally necessary to note that if the petitioner was a daily wager she cannot be terminated and replaced by another daily wager. If a daily wage engagement has to continue, the petitioner has to be continued till regular appointment. The writ application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)