HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^r' PETmONER WRIT PETITION (Q No. 2777 of 2008 : Praveen Deevaa, aged 35 years, son of Goverdhaa Dewan, resident of village Tumgaon, District Mahasamuud (CG). RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1, State of Chhattisgarh, fhr. Secretaxy, Goveroinent of Chhattisgarh, Paachayat & Rural Developxaent Department, DKS Bhawaa, Maatralaya, Raipur (CG), 2, The CoUector, Mahasamund, Distdct Mahasamund (CG). 3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Distt. Mahasainund (CG), 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Paachayat, Mahasaaiuiid (CG). 5. Smt, Annapimia Sahu, aged 39 yeare, W/o Ttdsiram Sahu, R/o Post Tumgaon, Tahsil 8& Distt. Mahasaoiund (CG). PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aasnihotri, J. Present: Shn P.S. Koshy, Advocate wifh Shri Vivek Verma, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri Vivek Sharma, Paael Lawyer for the State/rcspondents No. 1 to 3. Shri Paakaj Shrivastava, Advocate for the respondent No.4. Shri V.K. Pandey, Advocate for fhe respondent No.5, ORDER (ORALI (Passed on 17A day ofJiily, 2009) Heard learaed counsel for fhe parties, 1. Bemg aggrieved by the maction on fhe part of fhe respondents/ aiithonties, whereby they are not taking any action agaiast the respondent No,5, who is Sarpaach of fhe Gram Panchayaty Tumgaon, fhis petition has been filed. 2, I^eamed counsel appearing for fhe parties joiatly subniit fhat fhe matter may be referred to fhe Sub Divisional OflBcer (Revenue), Mahasainund, for heariag fhe inatter on fhe coiirplamts inade by tbe petitioner and to decide the same, ia accordaiice wifh law, 3. 4. after affordiag proper opportunily of hearmg to all the conceraed parties. In view offhe above, wifh the consent ofthe parties, fhe raatter is reiaanded back to fhe Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Mahasamund to hear fhe coniplam.ts of fhe petitioner and pass appropriate order, wifhia a penod of four weeks froia the date of receipt of a copy of this order, ia accordaace with law, after haviag afforded opportunity of hearmg to all fhe conceraed parties. In view ofthe foregoiag, this petition stands disposed ofwitti ttie above direction. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K-Agnihotri Judge Thabir