IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 10881 of 2008. Decided on: 21.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Gopal Parshad. … Petitioner. Versus Forest Corporation and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, learned counsel for the respondents fairly submits that the impugned order stands withdrawn. In other words, the status of the petitioner stands restored. Consequently, in view of the statement made by Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, learned counsel for the respondents, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 21, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.