C‘8¢\O IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION No. £2 97?? /2oo4 PETITIONER Smt. Laxmi Bai Barik, wife of Sadanand Barik, aged about 46 years, Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School —— Tamnar, Vikas Khand — 2“ Tamnar, Distt. Raigarh (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through, the Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. The Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. The. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) 4. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIAP 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER ’ORDERS, DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS. 03/09/2004: — Shri A‘N, Bhakta, counsel for th petitioner, o t Shri'V.V.S, ‘Murthy, Dy. Advo e General, with Shri U.N.S. Deo: G.A., 8hri ashwant Thakur, GA, Shri Satish pta, Dy.G.Ai: Shri Akhil Agrawal and-Shri Sandeep Dubey, Panel Lawyers, fcrth State/respondents. Certmed copy as per rules, Copyto State counsel for comp lance, Application for urgent hearing is allowed. Heard. Learned counsel for the petition r submits that the matter relates to transfer of the petitioner He further submits thatf r the- present the petitioner may be given an opportunity of filing the detailed repres ntatioh before the Competent Authority of the respondents: which shall be considere on its own merits in accordance with law. Having heard and considered he rival contentions, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in th opinion of this Court ends ofjustioe would be served if a direction is given to the petiti ner to make a detailed representation raising her grievance before the StatefComp t Authority of the respondents along with a copy of the petition and this order, withi ten days, and on such representation being made, the competent authority of the respondents shall consider and decide the same on its own merits in accordance 'vith law as early as possible, preferably within six weeks from the date of receipt of th representation. if any contravention of policy or guidelines is brought to the notice, t e same be considered on its own merits, ‘Learned counsel for the petiio‘her prays that after the decision of the representation, if any grievance of the etitioner remains she may be allowed to avail the remedy available under the law. lt is open to the petitioner to avaii the remedy available under the law. , With the aforesaid observations this‘petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P., if any, s ands disposed of, Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge W his arias A Y u e n