IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19460 of 2010 1. GANU @ GAINU YADAV 2. SANJAY YADAV 3. SATTAN YADAV 4. UPENDRA YADAV 5. MUNILAL YADAV 6. BIKAS YADAV 7. MULKI YADAV -------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 5.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that present case is filed only to save the skin of informant, her son and other family members from the case filed on behalf of petitioner no.1 in which super-added allegation of theft is leveled. No ingredient of offence under section 307 IPC is made out nor any ingredient of offence under section 3(i)(x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is alleged or shown specifying any petitioner though a vague and omnibus allegation is there that accused persons abused in name of informant’s caste. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above 2 named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in Munger Harizan P.S. Case No. 24/2010, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)