IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.26342 of 2009 Between: Shaik Salma Sulthana ..... Petitioner AND 1.Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada City, Krishna District and 2 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Challa Ajay Kumar Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2: AGP for Home Counsel for Respondent No.3: Sri K.Suresh Reddy The Court made the following: Order: In this Writ Petition, the petitioner sought for a Mandamus to direct respondent No.2, to take action on her complaint, dated 17-11-2009, endorsed by respondent No.1. According to the petitioner, respondent No.3 married the petitioner and, after taking away all her gold ornaments and selling them, he has tried to marry another lady. When the petitioner’s complaint, dated 17- 11-2009, was not registered by respondent No.2, she approached respondent No.1, who made an endorsement to respondent No.2 to enquire and report. As no action has yet been taken by respondent No.2, the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, stated that respondent No.2 received the complaint from the petitioner; that after making an entry in the GD register, he made an enquiry; that his enquiry revealed that the petitioner was, earlier, married to another person and begot two children and that she was not the wife of respondent No.3. She further stated that the enquiry also revealed that the petitioner is an accused in Crime No.174 of 2006, dated 30-06-2006, on the file of the II Town Police Station, Vijayawada, registered for the offence under Section 366-A of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Assistant Government Pleader, however, submitted that since the complaint made by the petitioner did not reveal commission of any offence, the First Information Report is not registered. Sri K.Suresh Reddy, learned Counsel representing respondent No.3, supported the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. Having regard to the stand taken by the respondents, I am of the opinion that no relief can be granted to the petitioner in this Writ Petition. If the petitioner felt aggrieved by non-registration of her complaint, she is entitled to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 190 read with Section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Subject to the above observation, the Writ Petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.34288 of 2009, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 4th March, 2010 lur