1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 207 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7258 OF 2009 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATED : 14.09.2010 Mr. D.R. Jaybhar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for respondent/ State. 1. This contempt petition was filed alleging that the respondents have not obeyed order dated 03.02.2010 passed by the learned Division Bench in Writ Petition No. 7258 of 2009. This Court issued notices to the respondents. In pursuant to the notice, respondents have filed affidavit-in-reply. In para 5 of the affidavit-in-reply, it is stated thus:- “5. I say and submit that, accordingly, after verifying the record, it is clear that, the petitioners are entitled for the rental compensation. I say that, accordingly, the deponent has issued letter dt. 20.8.2010 to the acquiring body the Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation, 2 Beed i.e., the respondent no.4 in the present contempt petition informing that, the necessary steps may kindly be taken for payment of rental compensation. Copy of said letter dt. 20.8.2010 is annexed herewith and marked as Exh.R-2.” 2. Since the order of learned Division Bench dated 03.02.2010 in Writ Petition No. 7258 of 2009 is duly complied by the respondents, however, order/direction is not complied within stipulated time of six weeks from 3rd February, 2010. In this regard, learned A.G.P. has invited my attention to para 7 of the affidavit-in-reply, in which satisfactory explanation is given and also unconditional apology is tendered for not complying the order within stipulated period. 3. In this view of the matter, nothing survives further in the contempt petition for consideration. Therefore, the contempt petition is disposed of. Notice discharged. [S.S. SHINDE,J.] snk/2010/SEP10/cp207.10