*THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO + WRIT PETITION Nos.17752, 18354, 18437, 18629, 18630, 18631, 18632, 18692, 19004, 19056, 19071, 19111, 19386, 19387, 19388, 19389, 19474, 19536, 19622, 19759, 20863, 20864, 21757 of 2004 and 13849, 13853 of 2005 % Dated 24-09-2008 # Between: 1 Mr.P.Nagendra Prasad, s/o Seshagiri Rao, Santhinagar, 2nd Street, Eluru-534 007, West Godavari District and others. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi rep., by its Secretary and others. ...RESPONDENTS ! Counsel for Petitioners: MR.P.BALAJI VARMA and others ^Counsel for Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) <GIST: > HEAD NOTE: ? Cases referred 1. (2002) 3 SCC 711 : AIR 2002 SC 1361 2. (2007) 10 SCC 198 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.17752, 18354, 18437, 18629, 18630, 18631, 18632, 18692, 19004, 19056, 19071, 19111, 19386, 19387, 19388, 19389, 19474, 19536, 19622, 19759, 20863, 20864, 21757 of 2004 and 13849, 13853 of 2005 WRIT PETITION NO : 17752 of 2004: Between: 1 Mr.P.Nagendra Prasad, s/o Seshagiri Rao, Santhinagar, 2nd Street, Eluru-534 007, West Godavari District. 2 Smt.Bh.Subhashini, w/o Ramakrishnam Raju, Door No.5-52, Racherla Road, Prapathipadu. 3 Smt.Cherukuwada Vyjayanthi, w/o Sri Ranganadha Raju, Door No.5-52, Racherla Road, Prathipadu. 4 Sri Ch.Narasimha Raju, s/o Siva Rama Raju, Door No.5-52, Racherla Road, Prathipadu. 5 Sri Ch.V.Narasimha Raju, s/o Sri Ranganadha Raju, Door No.5-52, Racherla Road, Prathipadu. 6 Sri Ch.Sri Ranganadha Raju, s/o Ch.V.Narasimha Raju, Door No.5-52, Racherla Road, Prathipadu. 7 Smt.T.Subrahmanyamma, w/o Suryanarayana Raju, Door No.5-52, Racherla Road, Prathipadu. 8 Sri A.Krishna Rao, s/o Ganganna, Pedatadepalli-534 101, Tadepalligudem Mandal, W.G.District. 9 Smt.P.Satya Vani, w/o P.Nagendra Prasad, Santhinagar, 2nd Street, Eluru-534 007, W.G.District. 10 Kum.A.Sri Geetha, d/o Lakshmana Rao, Santhinagar, 2nd Street, Eluru-534 007, W.G.District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi rep., by its Secretary 2 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, (Investment Credit Department), 3rd Floor, A&B Wing, C24, G.Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400 051, rep., by its Chief General Manager. 3 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Regional Office-Andhra Pradesh, 1-1-61, RTC Cross Roads, Musheerabad, Hyderabad-500 020, rep., by its Deputy General Manager. 4 Central Bank of India, Zonal Office, Bank Street, Hyderabad-500 095 rep.by its General Manager 5 Central Bank of India, Tadepalligudem Branch, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District, rep., by its Branch Manager .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to pass an order or orders or direction or an appropriate more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the second and third respondents by their communications Ref.No.NB:ICD:FPC/RG-9 (Banks)/2004-05; dated 19-08-2004 and Ref.No.NB.AP.RO/HYD/ICD/9149/RG-1/2004-05; dated 01-09-2004 to exclude the cost towards facilities like boundary wall, internal roads, drainage system, weigh bridge, oﬃce buildings etc., from the outlay for calculating the subsidy amounts for the godowns of the petitioners and to recover the subsidy amounts paid to the petitioner for the same, as arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable and violative of principles of natural justice, doctrine of legitimate expectation and Article 14, 300 A of the Constitution of India Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.P.BALAJI VARMA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RS} WRIT PETITION NO : 18354 of 2004: Between: 1 Sri V. Kasi Viswanatham, S/o Papaya, D.No. 11-70, Alamuru Village and Mandal, East Godavari District. 2 Sri R. Narayana, S/o Katamraju, R/o Valluru Village, Kapileswarapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 3 Smt. P. Bhanumati, W/o Satyanarayana Murthy, Rajaratna 2nd Street, Mandapeta - 533 308, East Godavari District. 4 Sri Putta Ganni Raju, S/o Krishna Rao, r/o Maredubaka Village, Mandapeta Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi, rep. by its Secretary. 2 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, (Investment Credit Department) 3rd Floor, A&B Wing, C24, G. Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051 Rep. by its Chief General Manager. 3 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Regional Office - Andhra Pradesh, 1-1-61, RTC Cross Roads, Musheerabad,Hyderabad-500 020, Rep. by its Deputy General Manager. 4 Andhra Bank, Mandapeta Branch, Mandapeta - 533 308,Rep. by its General Manager. 5 Directorate of Marketing & Inspection, II Floor, Block I, Kendriya Sadan, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Senior Marketing Manager. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to pass an order or orders or direction or an appropriate more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the second and third Respondents to exclude the cost towards facilities like boundary wall, internal roads, drainage system, weigh bridge, oﬃce buildings etc, from the outlay or calculating the subsidy amounts for the godowns of the Petitioners, also limiting the subsidy to the estimated cost in exclusion of the actual cost or the prescribed cost under the scheme and to recover the subsidy amounts paid to the Petitioner for the same, as arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable and violative of principles of natural justice, doctrine of legitimate expectation and Article 14, 300A of the Constitution of India Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.P.BALAJI VARMA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) Form-NIC-OGS/WP{AVLR} WRIT PETITION NO : 18437 of 2004: Between: 1 Smt. B.Kamala Rani W/o Satyanada Rao, A/a Vadapalem Village Kottapeta Mandal, East Godavari Distirct. 2 Sri B.Srinivas Rao S/o B.Satyam Vadapalem Village Kottapeta Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, Krishi Bhavan New Delhi. rep.by its Secretary. 2 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Investment Credit Department ) 3rd Floor, A&B Wing, C24, G.Block, Bandra Kula Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051 rep.by its Chief General Manager. 3 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Regional Officer- Andhra Pradesh , 1-1-61, RTC Cross Roads, Musheerabad, Hyderabad 500 020 Rep.by its Deputy General Manager 4 Andhra Bank Main Branch, Ravulapalem East Godavari District rep.by its Branch Manager. 5 Directorate of Marketing & Inspection, II Floor, Block I, Kendriya Sadan, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad rep.by its Senior Marketing Manager. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to To pass on order or orders or direction or an appropriate more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the second and third Respondents to exclude the costs towards facilites like boundary wall, internal roads, drainage system, weigh bridge, oﬃce building etc., from the outlay for calculating the subsidy amounts for the godowns of the petitioners, also limiting the subsidy to the estimated cost in exclusion of the actual cost or the prescribed cost under the scheme and to recover the subsidy amounts paid to the petitioner for the same, as arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable and violative of principles of natural justice, doctrine of legitimate expectation and Art. 14, 300 A of the Constitiution of India. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.P.BALAJI VARMA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) Form-NIC-OGS/WP{GR} WRIT PETITION NO : 18629 of 2004: Between: 1 Sri A.Ramakrishna, S/o Chakradhara Rao, R/o Beside AVR & Co Rice Mill, Velpur-534 222 Tanuku Mandal, West Godavari District 2 Sri P.Ramachandra Rao, S/o Venkata Krishna Rao, C/o Tarani Beauty Parlour, Sajjapuram, Tanuku, West Godavari District 3 Smr.A.Sudha Rani, W/o Ramakrishna, R/o Beside AVR & Co Rice Mill, Velpur Tanuku Mandal, West Godavari District 4 Sri A.Ramakrishna & Sri A.Radhakrishna, S/o Chakradhara Rao, R/o Beside AVR & Co Rice Mill, Velpur Tanuku (Mandal), West Godavari District 5 Sri A.Vivekanand & Sri A.Suresh, S/o Chakradhara Rao, R/o Beside AVR & Co Rice Mill, Velpur Tanuku Mandal, West Godavari District 6 Sri B.Nagendra Kumar, S/o Satyanarayana Murthy, R/o Sri Suryanarayana Rice Mill, Mail Road, Velpur, Tanuku Mandal, West Godavari District ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi rep.by its Secretary 2 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, (Investment Credit Department) 3rd Floor, A&B Wing, C24,G.Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai rep.by its Chief General Manager 3 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Regional Office-Andhra Pradesh, 1-1-61, RTC Cross Roads, Musheerabad, Hyderabad rep.by its Deputy General Manager 4 Union Bank of India, Tanuku Branch, Velpur Road, Tanuku rep.by its Branch Manager 5 The Directorate of Marketing & Inspection, 2nd Floor, Block 1, Kendriya Sadan, Sultanbazar, Hyderabad rep.by its Senior Marketing Manager .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to for the reasons stated in the accompanying aﬃdavit, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased pass an order or orders or direction or an appropriate more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the second and third Respondents to exclude the cost towards facilities like boundary wall, internal roads, drainage system, weigh bridge, oﬃce buildings etc., from the outlay for calculating the subsidy amounts for the godowns of the Petitioners and also limiting the subsidy to the estimated cost in exclusion of the actual cost or the prescribed cost under the scheme and to recover the subsidy amounts paid to the Petitioner for the same, as arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable and violative of principles of natural justice, doctrine of legitimate expectation and Article 14,300 A of the Constitution of India and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems ﬁt and proper in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.P.BALAJI VARMA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSR} WRIT PETITION NO : 18630 of 2004: Between: 1 Sri Jyothula Naveen Kumar S/o.Venkata Appa Rao Jaggampeta Mandal, East Godavari District. 2 Smt.Jyothula Mani S/o.Venkata Appa Rao Jaggampeta Mandal, East Godavari District. 3 Smt.Thota Suneetha W/o.Sarvarayudu Jaggampeta Mandal, East Godavari District. 4 Sri Jyothula Subba Rao S/o.Nageswara Rao Door No.3-206, Gangarajunagar Valasapakala, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 5 Sri Thota Sri Sudha W/o.T.S.R.Prasad Door No.3-206, Gangarajunagar Valasapakala, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 6 Kum. Jyothula Sri Raja D/o.Subba Rao Door No.3-206, Gangarajunagar Valasapakala, Kakinada. 7 Sri Jyothula Rama Swamy S/o.Marthandarama Murthy Irripaka Village Jaggampeta Mandal, East Godavari District. 8 Sri Jyothula Naga Veera Venkata Vishnu Satya Marthanda Rao S/o.Rama Swamy Irripaka Village Jaggampeta Mandal, East Godavari District. 9 Smt.Nalla Raja Ratna Chekra Surya Kumari W/o.Venkata Narasayya Irripaka Village Jaggampeta Mandal, East Godavari District. 10 Smt.Thota Satya Anantha Laxmi W/o.Krishna Babu Irripaka Village Jaggampeta Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture Krishi Bhavan New Delhi rep by its Secretary. 2 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Investment Credit Department), 3rd Floor, A&B Wing, C24, G. Bandra Kurla Complex Bandra (East )Mumbai-400051 Rep. by its Chief General Manager. 3 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Regional Office Andhra Pradesh 1-1-61, RTC Cross Roads, Musheerabad, Hyderabad 500020 Rep.by its Deputy General Manager. 4 (Indian Overseas Bank) Governorpet Branch, Vijayawada, Rep. by its Branch Manager R4 is deleted as per court order dt. 30-6-2005 in WPMP 2545 of 2005 5 The Directorate of Marketing and Inspection 2nd Floor, Block1, Kendriya Sadan Sultanbazar, Hyderabad Rep. by its Senior Marketing Manager. 6 Syndicate Bank, NARSINJI Branch, Hyderabad R.R.District rep. by its Branch Manager R6 is impleaded as per court order dt. 30-3-2005 in WPMP 2544 of 2005 .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to pass order or orders or direction or an appropriate more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the second and third Respondents to exclude the cost towards facilities like boundary wall, internal roads, drainage system, weigh bridge, oﬃce buildings etc., from the outlay for calculating the subsidy amounts for the godowns of the petitioners and also limiting the subsidy to the estimated cost in exclusion of the actual cost or the prescribed cost under the scheme and to recover the subsidy amounts paid to the petitioner for the same as arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable and violative of principles of natural justice, doctrine of legitimate expectation and Article 14, 300 A of the Constitution of India and pass. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.P.BALAJI VARMA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MPL} WRIT PETITION NO : 18631 of 2004: Between: 1 Sri P.Janaki Ram, s/o Satyanarayana, r/o H.No.3-561, Ramakrishna Nagar, Humukpeta, Rajahmundry-533 124, East Godavari District. 2 Sri P.Satyanarayana, s/o Janakiramaiah, r/o 9-10-3/1, Gaddei Lane, Gandhi Nagar, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 3 Sri S.V.R.K.Varma, s/o Padbhanaba Raju, r/o 21-7-23, Drakshani Nilayam, Korlampeta, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi rep., by its Secretary 2 National Bank for agriculture and Rural Development (Investment credit Department), 3rd Floor, A&B Wing, C24, G.Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400 051, rep., by its Chief General Manager 3 National Bank for agriculture and Rural Development, Regional office-Andhra Pradesh, 1-1-61, RTC Cross Roads, Musheerabad, Hyderabad-500 020, rep., by its Geputy General Manager. 4 Indian Overseas Bank, Kakinada Branch, Main Road, Kakinada, East Godavari District rep., by its Branch Manager 5 The Directorate of Marketing & Inspection, 2nd Floor, Block 1, Kendriya Sadan, Sultanbazar, Hyderabad, rep., by its Senior Marketing Manager .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to pass an order or orders or direction or an appropriate more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the second and third respondents to exclude the cost towards facilities like boundary wall, internal roads, drainage system, weigh bridge, oﬃce buildings etc., from the outlay for calculating the subsidy amounts for the godowns of the petitioners and also limiting the subsidy to the estimated cost in exclusion of the actual cost or the prescribed cost under the scheme and to recover the subsidy amounts paid to the petitioner for the same, as arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable and violative of principles of natural justice, doctrine of legitimate expectation and Article 14, 300 A of the Constitution of India and pass Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.P.BALAJI VARMA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RS} WRIT PETITION NO : 18632 of 2004: Between: 1 Sri A.S.Chakravarthi S/o Posaiah , Chakravarthi Complex, Danavaipeta, Rajahmundry-533 124, East Godavari District. 2 Smt. Mangayamma W/o Posaiah Chakravarthi Complex, Danavaipeta, Rajahmundry-533 124, East Godavari District. 3 Smt. Ratna Mani W/o Chakravarthi Chakravarthi Complex, Danavaipeta, Rajahmundry-533 124, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 TheGovernment of India Ministry of Agriculture, krishi Bhavan, New Delhi, rep.by its Secretary. 2 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Investment Cerdit Department) 3rd Floor, A&B wing, C24, G.Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (east) Mumbai-400 051 Rep.by its Chief General Manager. 3 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Regional office-Andhra Pradesh, 1-6-61, RTC Cross Roads, Musheerbad, Hyderabad. 500 020 rep.by its Deputy General Manager 4 Andhra Bank Prakash Nagar, Branch, Danavaipeta, Rajhamundry, East Godavari District rep.by its Branch Manager. 5 TheDirectorate of Marketing & Inspection, 2nd Floor, Block 1, Kendriya Sadam, Sultanbazar, Hyderabad., rep.by its Senior Marketing Manager. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to To pass an order or orders or direction or an appropriate more particulary one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the second and third Respondents to exclude the cost towards facilities like boundary wall, internal road, drainage system, weight bridge, oﬃce buildings ect., from the outlay for calculating the subsidy amounts for the godowns of the petitioner and also limiting the subsidy to the estimated cost in exclusion of the actual cost or the prescribed cost under the scheme and to recover the subsidy amounts paid to the petitioner for the same, as arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable and violative of principle of natural Justice, doctrine of legitimate expectation and Art.14, 300 A of the Constitution of India Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.P.BALAJI VARMA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) Form-NIC-OGS/WP{GR} WRIT PETITION NO : 18692 of 2004 Between: 1 M/s Venkata Storages Yards Penumadam, Sabbyvari Peta, Palakollu-534 260, West Godavari District, Rep. by its Managing Partner Mr.V.Surredd 2 M/s Manihamsa Storages Yards Penumadam, Sabbyvari Peta, Palakollu-534 260, West Godavari District, Rep. by its Managing Partner Mr.V.Surredd ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of India Ministry of Agriculture Krishi Bhavan New Delhi, Rep by its Secretary. 2 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Investment Credit Department) 3rd Floor, A&B Wing, C24, G.Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East),Mumbai- 400051 Rep.by by its Chief General Manager. 3 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Regional Office Andhra Pradesh 1-1-61, RTC Cross Roads,Musheerabad, Hyderabad Rep.by by its Deputy General Manager. 4 Andhra Bank Ravulapalem Branch Ravulapalem -533-238 East Godavari District Rep. by its Branch Manager. 5 The Directorate of Marketing and Inspection 2nd Floor, Block 1, Kendriya Sadan Sultanbazar, Hyderabad Rep.by its Senior Marketing Manager. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to pass order or orders or direction or an appropriate more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the second and third Respondents to exclude the cost towards facilities like boundary wall, internal roads, drainage system, weigh bridge, oﬃce buildings etc., from the outlay for calculating the subsidy amounts for the godowns of the petitioners and also limiting the subsidy to the estimated cost in exclusion of the actual cost or the prescribed cost under the scheme and to recover the subsidy amounts paid to the petitioner for the same as arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable and violative of principles of natural justice, doctrine of legitimate expectation and Article 14, 300 A of the Constitution of India and pass. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.P.BALAJI VARMA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MPL} WRIT PETITION NO : 19004 of 2004: Between: 1 Mr.K.R.K.Murthy Raju S/o Bhima raju 1-9-1/1, R.K.Adarshnagar. Bhimavaram 534 235 West Godavari District 2 Mrs. K.S.L.R.Jhansi Rani W/o K.R.K. Murthy Raju 1-9-1/1, R.K.Adarshnagar. Bhimavaram 534 235 West Godavari District 3 Mrs. P.Lakshmikantham W/o Krishnam Raju 1-9-1/1, R.K.Adarshnagar. Bhimavaram 534 235 West Godavari District ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of India Ministry of Agriculture Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi, rep.by its Secretary 2 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Investement Cerdit Department) 3rd Floor, A&B, Wing, C24,G.Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East) ,Mumbai-400 051 rep.by its Chief General Manager, 3 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Regional Officer-Andhra Pradesh 1-6-61, RTC Cross Road, Musheerabad, Hyderbad.-500 020 rep.by its Deputy General Manager. 4 Indian Oveseas Bank Governorpet Branch, Vijayawada Rep.by its Branch Manager 5 The Directorate of Marketing & Inspection 2nd Floor, Block 1, Kendriya Sadan Sultanbazar, Hyderabad rep.by its Senior Marketing Manager .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to To pass an order or direction or an appropriate more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Second and third Respondents to exclude the cost towards facilities like boundary wall, interanal roads, drainage system, weigh bridge, office building etc., from the outlay for calculating the subsidy to the estimated cost in exclusion of the actual cost or the prescribed cost under the scheme and to recover the subsidy amounts paid to the petitoner for the same,as arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable and violative jof principles of natural justice, doctrine of legitimate expectation and Art. 14,300 A of the constitution of India Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.P.BALAJI VARMA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) Form-NIC-OGS/WP{GR} WRIT PETITION NO : 19056 of 2004: Between: 1 Ms.B.Silpa D/o B.Bapi Raju Plot No.3, Padmaja colony, M.V.Nagar, Secunderabad. 2 Mr.B.Bapi Raju D/o B.Bhaskara Rao Plot No.3, Padmaja colony, M.V.Nagar, Secunderabad. 3 Mrs. B.Nagamani W/o B.Bapi Raju Plot No.3, Padmaja colony, M.V.Nagar, Secunderabad. 4 Mr. B.Ravi S/o B.Bapi Raju Plot No.3, Padmaja colony, M.V.Nagar, Secunderabad. 5 Mr.B.S.P.Rao S/o B.Bhaskara Rao H.No.179, AWHO colony Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of India Ministry of Agriculture Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi, rep.by its Secretary, 2 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Investment Credit Department) 3rd Floor, A&B, Wing, C24, G.Block, Bandra Kurla Comlex, Bandra (East) Mumbi-400 051 rep.by its Chief General Manager, 3 National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Regional Office-Andhra Pradesh, 1-1-61, RTC Cross Roads, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.500 020 rep.by its Deputy General Manager 4 Sydicate Bank Mankhal Branch, Mankhal Village, Maheswaram Mandal, Tukkuguda Road, Ranga Reddy District. Rep.by its Branch Manager. 5 The Directorate of Marketing & Inspection, 2nd Floor, block 1, Kendriya Sadan, Sultanbazar, Hyderabad Rep.by its Senior Marketign Manager. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to To pass an order or orders or direction or an appropriate more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the second and third Respondents to exclude the cost towards facilities like boundary wall, internal road, drainage system, weigh bridge, oﬃce building ect. from the outlay for calculating the subsidy amounts for the godowns of the petitioners and also limiting the subsidy to the estimated cost in exculsion of the actual cost or the prescribed cost under the scheme and to recover the subsidy amounts paid to the Petitioner for the same, as arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable and violative of Principles of natural Justice, doctrine of legitimate expectation and Art. 14,300 A of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.P.BALAJI VARMA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) Form-NIC-OGS/WP{GR} WRIT PETITION NO : 19071 of 2004: Between: 1 Mr. R. Achhi Reddy S/o Ram Reddy D. NO. 4-479, Halia Village, Annumula Mandal, Nalgonda District 2 Mr. M. Linga Reddy S/o Rami Reddy Opp Bus Stand, Halia Village, Annumula Mandal, Nalgonda District 3 Mr. K. Linga Reddy S/o K. Narayana Reddy D. E. No. EE/16, Hill Colony, Nagrjuna Sagar, Nalgonda District 4 Mr. N. Srinivas Prasad, S/o N. Narayana Swamy Shakarpur, Nidamnur, Nalgonda District ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of India, Ministry of Agriculure, Krishi Bhavan, new Delhi, rep by Secretary 2 National Bank for AGriculture and Rural Development (Investment Credit Department) 3rd Floor, A&B wing C24, G. Block Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai 400 051 rep by Chief General Manager 3 National Bank for Agricultrue and Rural Development, Regional Office-Andhra Pradesh 1-161, RTC Cross Roads, Musheerabad, Hyderabad rep by Deputy General Manager 4 Indian Overseas Bank Kakinada Branch, Main Road, Kakinada, East Godavari District rep by Branch Manager 5 The Directorate of Marketing & Inspection, 2nd Floor, Block 1, Kendriya Sadan, Sultanbazar, Hyderabad rep by Senior Marketing Manager .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to pass an order or orders or direction or an appropriate more particulalry one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the second and third Respondnets toexculude the cost towards facilities like boundary wall internal roads, drainage system, weigh bridge, oﬃce buildings etc., from the outlay for caluclating the subsidy amounts for the godowns of the petitioenrs and also limiting the subsidy to the estimated cost in exculusion of the actual cost or the prescribed cost under the scheme and to recovery