^^S^f^^^^^^ 1C ^^ ^WW^, W^tWTS, t^TRT^ "WiWWElN?""""""""""""" """"""""""""^T^ 200 3TI^??T T2RSF (l?^^) ^ST^?1^S?W WT3?^?tlF^N? ^^aiq^ ^fta ^^ VE 2. cM<4t<n<fll '^T^tf ^ 1^^ ^!t$i< ^stRm^n^T O OF Inven Pharmaceuticais Pvt. Ltd. A ^ompany Registered and fche pompanles Act, having its at 27/1, Patel Nagar, Maln l.oad, Indore 452-001 (MP) Through b Authorized representative Manish ^ingh Sikarwar, S/o SS Sikarwar, iged about 37 years/ R/o C-M/113, iukhiiya Indore.(Madhya Pradesh) ^tate of CtThatfisgarh . through ;ecretary, Departme.nt of Heaith and 'amiiy Welfare, DKS Bhawan, 'Raipur CG) 'he. Dlrector, Dlrectorate of Health ;ervices, behind Mantralaya, Ralpur, lalpur. (ChEiattisgarh) olnt Director Cum Chalrman 'urchase Committee Ministry of »epartment of Heaith and Family Velfare DKS Bhavvan, Mantra!aya, laipur, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 1/s Claris Life Sdence Lirnited, 'iliage Chacharwadi Vasana, Taluka :anand, Dlstrict . Ahmedabad, Sujarafc, Through it's Director-M/s. ;iaris Llfe Science Urnlted. ^mT^n ?r^T ^TOP4 ^^RI^t^—FS/95—11/2008—l ,00; . ^f^ ^ '^ i 1s 11 ^.,.^.'' ,;.^f^' •:^-^ '3^';:;EiPTT?PT, ^TilwKo, [c«'i]-y^< <IW^ITW*IIW "¥F|200 ^T^T '<T^? (^I^<q^r) ^r^nr^rtN^ ^maiyy^rw^ ^iKT^P? ^ Shri Chandresh Shrivasta' Shri UNS Deo, Searned GA By the jnstant petitlon, foiiowjng reilefs:. "l-0.1The Hon'bie Court order impugned, as it to rej reJatlon to the i|nay klndiy be pieased to quash the refcroduced as Annexure P/l, in sofar bct the tender of the petitloner in contr|tct jn questlon. 10.2 The Hon'bie Court In the nature ofj respondent authonj petitioner and con^' the avvard ofcontra-1 ifsay 10.3 Thls Hon'bie Court respondent to cana respondent No.4 wii submitted for tendel 10.4 Any other reiief, Hon'ble Court jus clrcumstances of favour of the pet| petltlon.ff Learned counsei for th concerned authorities, subrnit; pstitlon,. the contract has ai ^i^f^i<ilt ^^<riT'^f^'(^<fa^K ^T3?fOT3?^r a, learned counsel for the petitioner. for fche State. the petitioner has prayed for the klndiy be to issue a 'writ Mandamus or dlrection to the ^ies to consider price bld of the ider the same aiongwith others for ^t In question. may Edndiy be to cllrect tSie il the order of grantlng tender to the thout considering the others tenders .53, in the Interest ofjustlce. •vhich rnay be fit by thls and proper in the facts and ie rnay be provided in tloner, Inciudlng the of the flll State, on Instructions from the thst during pendency of this writ finailzed In favour of - /2008—1,00,000. T ^^ 1 J i ^^ -} ^•^^ ^^ ^ww^, ^wfw, 'f^rray HT*T<W %»*<!<»» "W^ 200 ^i^r ^raqF (^i^^T) ^li^T^T^t^ W?<ffI^T^1W •^ I^TOT^fN^^T respondent No.4 and accordingl^ It. He aiso submlts that respor suppiy' of goods. In view of above submis^i the State, learned' counsei for patitiQn vvith ilberty to file before the compefcent'.dvil Courq Accordingjy, the instant vvltli iibertyas prayed for. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge \^, the work order has been Issued to |dent No.4 has aiready commenced lon on behaif of iearned counse! for tjhe petitioner to withdraw this apjpropriate proceedings for damages jpetition is dismlssed as vvithdrawn <lM^f<11<^1 ^fH^I ^Tfs^ <R»I^.K ^'3TR?H^TT^[ Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge ^m7^n ?NP-? ^»n^s[iTSRf^ff^-—S^S/95—i 1 /2098—1 ,00',000, •