IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT No. 2129 of 1988 M/s.Indexpo International(P)Ltd. & Anr. .. Plaintiffs versus M/s.Kewal Cargo Carriers P.Ltd. .. Defendant ... Ms.S. Dwivedi i/b P.N. Sadarangani for the plaintiffs. None for the defendant. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 22nd June 2006. DATED : 22nd June 2006. DATED : 22nd June 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff. None present for the defendant. 2. The Counsel for the plaintiff points out that the defendant has not filed written statement for several years ago. Counsel therefore prays for a decree under Order 8 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Suit is only for recovery of money. In the absence of written statement, the averments made in the plaint are deemed to be admitted. 3. Suit of the plaintiff is decreed under Order 8 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure in terms of prayer clauses(i), (ii) and (iii). (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J)