IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 553 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 553 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 553 OF 2009 Shakir Chand Shaikh ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Abhaykumar Apte for the Applicant. Mr.Rajesh More, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 11, 2009 DATED : FEBRUARY 11, 2009 DATED : FEBRUARY 11, 2009 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard Counsel for the applicant and APP for the State. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail. Four persons were apprehended by the police while they were trying to commit the dacoity. Those four persons have named the present applicant as a person who had asked when the raid was conducted by the police. 3. It is submitted by the Counsel for the applicant that the applicant had already admitted as Orthopedic patient in Buldhana and the Medical Certificate to that effect has been given by the Doctor. - 2 - 4. This submission cannot be accepted. No case is made out for grant of anticipatory bail. The other three accused have been reported to be released on bail. The applicant may also make a similar application. The question of alibi will be considered only after evidence is led in the trial. 4. Hence, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)