^^..^ • .^0..-- ®^ ......t^ ^s^^^ &l»ie;:i'p IRFSir"*'! &SK>-<i..£ UL.SII>u3;' (^ c^i^, -^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE.AT^BLASPUR , -v.^ PETITIONER:- CHHHATISGARH W.P.NP.63^-2006 Yuvraj Singh S/o Shri Shouki Lal, Sahu aged cAoul-33 years , Sarpanch Grani Panchayat-Dumarpali , Tehsil & Distt. Raigarh (C.G). VERSUS RE^PONDENS:- l.Ganpat Ram Sahu S/o Hazaru Sahu, R/o vmage-Dumaqiali^Tehsil & Distt. Raigarh (C.G). ^ ^ ^"^.^ ^ 2.0hote Das S/o Hari Das R/o ViUage- DumarpaU , Tehsil 85 Distt. Raigarh (C.G) S.Kayat Ram S/o Gulab R/o vmage- Dumarpali ,Tehsil & Distt. Raigarh (C.G). 4. Ramesh S/o Not Known R/o Village- Dumarpalt, TehsU 85 Distt. Raigarh (C.G). S.Rajendra S/o Gulab R/o ViUage- Dumarpali , Tehsil & Distt. Raigarh (C.G). ^ 6.8pecified Officer Cum Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) TehsU 85 Distt. Raigarh (C.G). ^7-State of Chhattisgarh^, Through Secretary,Panchayat & Social Welfare , D.K.S. Bhavan,Manta-alay Raipur (C.G). ^•z--?-,/^ WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE ^SA^^T'OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ©) H1GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR SiNGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATiSH K. AGNiHOTRI. J. Petitjoner Respondents fRIT PETiTlON {C.} NO.S912 OF 200( Yuvraj Singh yersys Ganpat Ram Sahu and others Present : iyir, K.N.Nande, counsei for the petitloner. Mr. N.K.Agrawal, Deputy Advocate Generai with A.S.Kachhawaha, Government Advocate for No.6and7. None appears for other respondents. ith (Passed on 11'" Day of December, 2006) The petitioner is an elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Dumarpali, Tahsil and District Raigarh. The eiection of the Sarpanch has been chalienged by respondent No.1 - Mr. Ganpat Ram Sahu. Admfttedly, the election petltlon is pending consideration before ths Spsclfied Ofilcer, l.e., the Sub-Divisionai Officer, Raigarh. The petitioner had eariier nled a writ petition, being Writ Petition No.1236 of 2006, wherein the order dated 21-11-2005 pgssed &y the Spacified Authority rejecting an appiication of the present petitioner to permit impisadment of parties cSuring pendency of the eiection petition of respondent No.1 was questloned. This Court, aftsr hearing, vide order dated 9-3-2006 (Annexurs P-6), dismissed the writ petition of the petitioner at admissjon stage with an obsewation that the Specified Officer, i.e., the Sub-Dlvisional Officer, Raigarh shall dispose of the e!ecSion petition in accordance wsth the ruies prescribed for the same. 2. The petitioner has again fiied the present petition making allegations of unfair trial ete. This peiitlon cannot be entertained on the sald ground. if there is any objection to conduct of the election petition pending before the Specified Officer, the petitioner may challenge the same at the first instance before the Specified Officer. 3. This petffion is accordingly disposed of with iibsrty granted to ths petitioner to raise any objectlon with regard to conduct of the eiection petition before the Specified Authority. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge e'tliaY