IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23527 of 2009 1. FAZAL HAQUE @ FAZLY RAHMAN @ FAZLU RAHMAN 2. INSAN ALI 3. AHSAN ALI 4. TAHSAN ALI @ TASAN ALI Versus STATE OF BIHAR 2 16.09.2009 Petitioners, who are father and three sons, have approached this court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse sections of Arms Act. On a tip, police have raided the house of petitioner no. 1 who was required in another case. It is alleged that the petitioner no. 1 and his three sons escaped from the house. On search, several arms and ammunitions are said to have been recovered from the said house. Learned counsel submits that the father may have some antecedents but so far petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 4 are concerned, they are sons. There is no allegation that the police raided the house to secure arrest of these three petitioners. Referring to the seizure memo, it is contended that the same was not afforded to any of the family member under signature. This court finds that a case for indulgence respecting petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 4 has definitely been made out. In the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, let petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 4 namely Insan Ali, Ahsan Ali and Tahsan Ali @ Tasan Ali be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2 learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Amdabad P.S. case no. 76 of 2007 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure. So far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, his prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )