IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 19147 of 2005 Between: 1 M.Anji Reddy, s/o late M.Yella Reddy, r/o Chaitanyapuri, Hyderabad. 2 P.Saidaiah Naidu, s/o P.Venkaiah, r/o Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. .. PETITIONERS AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy Division, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Collector & Mandal Revenue Officer, Hayathnagar Mandal, Hayathnagar, R.R.District. 3 Smt.Razia Khanam, w/o Mumtaz Ali, r/o 17-3-1/3, Yakathpura, Hyderabad. 4 Mir Musthafa Ali Khan, s/o late Mir Bande Ali Khan, r/o 17-3-1/3, Yakathpura, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MR G.V.KOTESWARA RAO FOR MR.Y.V.RAVI PRASAD Counsel for respondents 1 and 2 : AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for respondents 3 and 4: None appeared The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the proceedings No.B/1456/2004, dt.15-4-2005 mutating the names of the 3rd and 4th respondents herein for the lands admeasuring Acs.11.21 gts. in Survey No.90 and Acs.8.03 gts., in Survey No.91 of Thattiannaram Village, Hayathnagar Mandal by cancelling the pattadar pass books and title deeds granted to the petitioners for the land admeasuring ac.3.00 gts. in Survey No.90(part) and 91(part) and Ac.1.32 gts., in Survey No.90 (part) of Thattiannaram Village, Hayathnagar Mandal is illegal, arbitrary, erroneous, highhanded and violative of the procedure prescribed under the Record of Rights Act and also violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct respondents 1 and 2 not to implement or act upon the said proceedings No.B/1456/2004 dt.15-4-2005 for any purpose and not to dispossess the petitioners from the lands mentioned supra”. At the hearing, Sri G.V.Koteswara Rao, learned counsel representing Sri Y.V.Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that since the petitioners have availed an alternative remedy of filing an appeal against the impugned order, they are not seeking to prosecute this writ petition. In view of this submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition for non-prosecution, interim order dated 02-09-2005 is vacated. WPMP No.24370 of 2005 is dismissed and WPMP No.21195 of 2008 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 31st July, 2008 vrn