IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 15TH MAGHA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 79 of 2010(S) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.6213/2006 Dated 27/07/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER NO.1 -------------------------------------------------- SUSY A JOSEPH, W/O JOSEPH, AGED 41 YEARS PUTHENPARAMBIL, KUTTAPUZHA P.O., THIRUVALLA. BY ADV. SRI.P.A.AUGUSTIAN SRI.T.R.JAGADEESH SRI.T.S.BIJU RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT NO.1 ------------------------------------------------------------ SHRI.SAJEEV, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, ASST.ENGINEER, KSEB, KALOOR, COCHIN. SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ Contempt of Court Case (C) NO. 79 OF 2010 (S) =============================== Dated this the 4th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T Non compliance of Annexure 1 judgment in W.P.(C) NO. 6213/06 is what is complained of in the petition. 2. When the matter came up for orders, counsel for the respondent submits that seeking restoration of power supply, petitioner had made an application and she also sought the benefit of one time settlement to liquidate the arrears that are due. It is stated that the Board has considered the application for one time settlement and that the same has been allowed. According to the respondent, once payment is made, power supply will be restored. This should redress the grievance of the petitioner, and therefore, the contempt petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp