CRA. 401-11 - 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 401 OF 2011 Mr. Raju C. Dewadiga ... Applicant Vs. Mr. Achyutanand K. Pandey (through constituted Attorney Mrs. Sushila A. Pandey) ... Respondent Mr. Devendranath S. Joshi, for the Applicant. Mrs. Sushil A. Pandey, the Constituted Attorney of the Respondent. CORAM: V. M. KANADE J. DATE : MAY 3, 2011 P.C. 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the parties have settled the dispute. Petitioner is the original tenant. He filed the suit for eviction, on various grounds. The trial Court decreed the suit and this order was confirmed in the appeal. Against the orders passed by the lower Courts, the applicant has filed this revision application. During pendency of this revision, parties have settled the matter and tendered the ‘Consent Terms’ . ‘Consent Terms’ are signed by the applicant and his advocate and the Constituted Power of Attorney CRA. 401-11 - 2 - Holder of respondent, who is present in the Court. He has shown the original Power of Attorney. He has represented the respondent even in the lower Courts. As per the ‘Consent Terms’, respondent has sold the suit premises to the applicant on ownership basis and has received the entire sale consideration. Civil Revision Application is, accordingly, disposed in the aforesaid terms. [ V. M. KANADE J.]