IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8443 of 2010 TILOTTAMA DEVI,w/o Mahesh Pandey,resident of Santer Mohalla,P.S.-Lakhisarai,Dist.- Lakhisarai. .. Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR.. Opposite Party ----------- 02/ 16-04-2010 Heard the parties. Petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Lakhisarai P.S.Case No.143 of 2009 dated 24-03-2009, registered under Sections 147/148/149/323/325/307/379/498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of the Arms Act as also under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is general and omnibus allegation of demand of dowry and torture against all the accused persons and allegation of assault is also general in nature. He further submits that the petitioner is the mother-in-law of the victim lady and main allegation is against the husband. Learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submit that petitioner being mother-in-law has also played specific role for committing the crime in question, but they have fairly conceded that there is no specific role assigned against her in the FIR. In that view of the matter, particularly on the ground that the petitioner is the mother-in-law of the victim lady, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today 2 in the above noted case, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)