IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 558 of 2008 With Stay App. No. 4440/2008 Smt. Fatima. …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. …… Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. None for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against the petitioner before the court concerned on 25.10.2008. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the stay application stands disposed of accordingly. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 09.02.2009 V.K.