IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 25503 of 2005 Between: Syed Moin, S/o Syed Mehtab, R/o. 18-8-157/A/75, Santhoshnagar, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, Hyderabad City, Hyderabad. 2 The Inspector Of Police, Malakpet Police Station, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondent not to harass the petitioner by summoning the petitioner to P.S. Malakpet, Hyderabad, or visiting the shop of the petitioner when he refused to remove the shop protected by court order or and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.AHMED KHAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: Petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus to direct the Inspector of Police, Malakpet Police Station, not to harass him by summoning him to the police station or visiting his shop when he refused to remove the shop protected by Court order. 2. Petitioner submits that he has been running a fruit juice center under the name and style of ‘Royal Fruit Juice’ at the Bus Stop, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad after taking permission from all the concerned. He further submits that neither the APSRTC nor the MCH has any objection with the said shop but the second respondent is insisting upon him to remove the shop and calling him to the police station. He further submits that he filed a suit in O.S.No.10 of 2004 on the file of II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and obtained interim injunction in I.A.No.21 of 2004 not to demolish the said shop. 3. If the injunction order is violated it is for the petitioner to take appropriate steps either before the civil Court for violation of the said order or make a necessary representation before the concerned authorities for necessary police protection by enclosing a copy of the subsisting injunction order. However, as the petitioner has not filed any representation/complaint, I am of the opinion that he is not entitled to any relief in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J March 11, 2008 DSK