IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9198 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 18, 2010. Veena Sundri .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Ms.Alka Chatrath, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner, who has been promoted as Lecturer-in- English, seeks a mandamus to direct the respondents to adjust her in the Government Girls Senior Secondary School, Kotkapura, District Faridkot. It is averred that as per the students-teachers ratio, the third post of Lecturer-in-English is justified in that school. In this regard, the petitioner is said to have represented the authorities vide representation dated 3.5.2010 (Annexure P-6) but without any response. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider the above noticed claim of the petitioner and dispose of the same by passing a C.W.P.No .9198 of 2010 2 speaking order, preferably within a period of 15 days from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 18, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE