THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6134 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.196 of 2006 in the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Pattikonda against the respondents for partition and separate possession of the suit schedule properties. An ex parte decree was passed on 14.03.2007. The respondents filed an application to set aside the ex parte decree. Since there was delay of 493 days in filing the application, they filed I.A.No.314 of 2008 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The trial Court allowed the I.A., through order, dated 06.11.2009. Hence, this revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. There was delay of 493 days in filing the petition to set aside the ex parte decree, dated 14.03.2007. The ground pleaded by the respondents was that they have migrated to Bangalore to eke out livelihood and they were not in touch with their counsel. The petitioner did not dispute the fact that the respondents left the village for their livelihood. The trial Court took the same into account and has set aside the ex parte decree by imposing costs. This Court does not find any error or defect in the order under revision. Therefore, the civil revision petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 07.12.2010. kdl