(^r'/d^^ f ^ 1 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.^ W.P.fS) No...^:l.dT..../2009 PETITIONER: VERSUS Mithlesh Pandey Aged about 51 Years W/o Late Shri MadangopalPandey R/o Sindhi Colony, Champa District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) RESPONDENTS: ^/ ^cy... ^s$/' .•^y -yy •^'. ^ 1. StateofChhattisgarh Through Secretary Panchayat and Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector Janjgir-Champa(C.G) /-3. Chief Executive Officer Zila- Panchayat, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) <4. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Bamnihdih, District- Janjgir-Champa 5. Chief Municipality Officer Nagar Palika, Champa Djstrict- Janjgir-Champa J^- 2. ^ >. General Administration Committee Janpad Panchayat, Bamnihdih, District- Janjgir- Champa PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUnON OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND^IRECTIONS: H IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl No. 719 OF 2009 Petitioner Resoondents Versus Smt. Saroj Dewangan State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRFT PETITION (S) No. 505 OF 2009 Petitioner ResDondents Versus Smt. Satyabhama Jaiswal State of Chhattisgarh & Others li, { Present:- Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govemment Advocate forthe State/ respondents No.1 & 2. Shri Vinay Harit, Senior Advocate wth Shri S.K. Mjshra, Advocate for the respondent No.4. Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate for the respondent No.5 & 6. Present:- Shri MateenSiddiqui, Advoeate for the petitioner. Shri Sushit Dubey, Government Advocate for the State/ respondents No.1 & 2. Shri Vinay Harit, Senior Advocate with Shri S.K. Mishra. Advocate for the respondent No.4. ShriAkhilesh Kumar, Advocate forthe respondent No.6. WRIT PETITION (Sl No. S08 OF 2009 Petitioner Respondents Versus Smt. Vimla Lahre State of Chhattisgarh & Others Present:- Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate forthe State/ respondents No.1 & 2. Shri Vinay Harit, Senior Advocate with Shri S.K. Mjshra, Advocate for the respondent No.4. Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate for the responderit No.5 & 6. /^ ^ R. ^^S^ ^'^^s^^ ^^B^^'^ \. '^J^ Petitioner Respondents WRIT PETITION (Sl No. 717 OF 2009 Smt. Mithlesh Pandey Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others Present:- Shri Mateen SJddiqui, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri Sushll Dubey, Government Advocate for the State/ respondents No.1 & 2. Shri Vinay Harit, Senior Advocate with Shri S.K. Mishra, Advocate for the respondent No.4. Shri Akhitesh Kumar, Advocate for the respondent No.5. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) ORDER (ORAU (Passed on 25th day of January. 201 1) 1. Learned counsel appearir^g for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not want to pi-esiS this petitipn on merit. However, the petjtioners mgy be granted liberty to make representation to the comjiet^nt authcunty, r^ising their igFievginces, to consider their case$, in aqcordacice with law. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other sjde have no objection. 3. Accordingly, the writ pet'rtions are disposed of. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file a representafion befpre tie competent authority, raising their grievanees, which may be considered bythe respondent authortties, in accordance wtth law. 4. Further, if representations are pending consideration with regard to payment of salary, the same shall be considered, in accordance with law, as early as possibte, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. In view of foregoing, the petitions stand disposed of. No order astocosts. -_ Sdl- , . SatishK.Agnihotn Judge ashok