1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO.32/2010 (The State of Mah. and Anr. Vs. Dattu Padghan and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 18 th January, 2010. ... 1) Heard Mr.DV Tele, learned AGP and Mr. Jaybhar learned Counsel for respondents. 2) The State feels aggrieved by the Award dated 5th April, 2004, where the learned 3rd Ad hoc Additional District Judge, Beed, granted enhanced compensation @ Rs.450/- and directed the State to pay Rs.68,298/-, by way of enhanced compensation with statutory benefits. The sale instances produced before the learned Judge indicated that they were for the value of Rs.800/- per R. and Rs. 500/- per R, the learned Reference Court, made 50% of the sale instances, on which appellant relied and reached a conclusion to the entitlement @ Rs.450/- per R. The finding recorded by the learned Judge of the Reference court in the situation cannot be said to be contrary to the record or exorbitant in award. 2 3) The First Appeal lacks merits, it is rejected. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/fa32.10