THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CRP Nos.5080 of 2011 & 5112 of 2011 COMMON ORDER: These revision petitions arise out of the order dated 7-9-2011 passed in IA Nos.952 of 2010 & 953 of 2010 in OS No.1053 of 2009 by the V Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Since in both these petitions, the parties and the subject matter is same and arise out of the same suit, they are heard together and being disposed by this common order. 2. IA No.952 of 2010 and IA No.953 of 2010 were filed to re-open and recall PW-1 for cross examination. By the impugned order the Court below dismissed both the applications. Hence these revisions. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order passed by the Court. The only reason assigned for recall and reopen the matter is that the petitioner wanted to mark copy of the order passed in land grabbing case in LGC 34 of 1999. It is not discernible from the averments made as to what exact purpose would be served by marking the document in question. It is observed by the Court below that the document sought to be marked does not pertaining to the suit property. As is evident from the order, the petitioner is denying the ownership and not admitting the relationship. The suit was filed for eviction and for recovery of arrears of rent. The correctness or otherwise of various allegations made will have to be considered by the Court below after full fledge trial. 4. In the circumstances, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order warranting interference by this Court. Both these civil revision petitions fail and they are accordingly dismissed, at the admission stage itself. __________________________ Ghulam Mohammed, J Dated: 3-12-2011 Nrg