1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10447 OF 2010 (Babru Yeshwanta Bhure & Anr Vs. Murlidhar Yogiraj Deshpande & Ors) ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ It is not in dispute that the appeal is provided against the impugned order dated 1.4.2010, passed by the Tahsildar (Revenue-1), Tahsil office, Ambejogai. When the counsel for the petitioner, Mr. R.P. Bhumkar, is confronted with the query by this court that when the appeal is provided why this writ petition should be entertained, he seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file appeal before the appropriate authority. In the circumstances, writ petition is allowed to the withdrawn and disposed of with liberty to file appeal before the appropriate authority. Needless to mention that the time consumed in prosecuting this writ petition, 2 may be taken into consideration while entertaining the prayer for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The concerned authority will also take into consideration the provisions of section 14 of the Limitation Act while considering application for condonation of delay. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) Date:25.11.2010. rlj/