HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wuf Petititm Sk N0. zz‘} of2M8 PETETIONERS : 1. Kishor Kama: Sahu S/o Shri Roman Ram Sahum, aged about 41 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary SchooL Sambalpur, Block Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari. 2.. Smt. Nemdzmi Chandrakar, W/o Shri Reshan Lal Chandrakar, Age about 38 ye-axs, Asstt. Teacher, G0vt. Primary School, Semare (B), Block Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Seeretary, Education & Tribal Department DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. District Education Omcor, Distt. Dhamtari (CG). ‘ (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2'26 OF THE CONSTlTUTlON OF INDIA) LS3: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agoihotri‘ J.) Present : Shgi SonLkant Velma, Advocate for the petitiooers. Shri Awind Dubey, Panel Lawyor for me Stats/respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 14 ofJammry, 2008) l. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondems jointly submits that the fact and question of law involved in the present Writ Petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation’ Durg and. another {2006(11) MPJR-CGQé}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. . In subsequent cases, i.e. Writ Petition (S) No. 4130 of 2005 (Gonesh KnmnrrVet-ma Vs. The Stnte of Chhnttisgarh and another) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15.12.2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28.01.1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma. in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature of the Basie Training ' [institute i.e. B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education i.e. D.Ed. Acoordingiy, the DEd. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S) No. 41 30 of 2005 (Gomh Knmnr Vol-ma Vs. The Statehf Chhattisgarh and another) (Supra). @ 2 'g L Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of tha order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Burg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the faots asto whether the petitioners have acquired D.Ed Examination Certificate on their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and fimher whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order asto costs. {s sw- l Satish K. Agnihngyi Judge l J Sahu