IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 11515 of 2009 Between: 1 A.Bhagwanthu Goud S/o.Late Hanumaiah Goud R/o.Thippayapally Village, Pebbar Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. 2 Govind S/o.Late Buchanna Goud R/o.Thippayapally Village, Pebbar Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. 3 Anjaneyulu S/o.Late Massanna R/o.Thippayapally Village, Pebbar Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Commissioner, Endowments, Government of A.P., Hyderabad. 2 The Asst. Commissioner, Endowments, Mahabubnagar District at Mahabubnagar. 3 The Chairman of the Trust Board of Anjaneya Swamy Temple, Thippayapally Village, Pebbar Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to call for the records of the impugned proceedings in pursuant to the impugned auction notification dated 23.4.2008 issued by the 3rd respondent for conducting auction of the Lease hold Rights of the lands in Sy.No. 322 & 323 at Thippayapalli Village, Pebbair Mandal, Mahabubnagar District proposed to be held on 14.6.2009 is illegal, unlawful, contrary to law and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to hold an enquiry and consider the cases of the petitioners and other tenants of the land in Sy.No.322 & 323 to have the benefit Under Section 82(2) of A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 and also the benefit Under Rule 3 of A.P. Charitable & Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Lease of Agricultural Lands Rules, 2003 and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.DAMODAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded, and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 27th July, 2009 bcj