CRM M 19851 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 19851 of 2010 Date of decision: 22.02.2011 Jagdish Ram ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. S K Khanpur, Advocate for Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab Mr. D S Malwai, Advocate for respondent No. 4 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of appropriate direction to the official respondents to take legal action against the private respondent in view of the investigation conducted by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Barnala dated 21.10.2009 and further to recover the stolen building material by respondent No. 4 illegally and in violation of the order dated 05.05.2009. Reply has been filed by the State. Para 9 of the said reply reads as under:- CRM M 19851 of 2010 2 “9. That regarding the contents of para No. 9 of the petition, it is submitted that since the matter was purely of civil nature so no action was taken on the report of DSP by the SSP regarding alleged theft after the opinion of the DA Legal and moreover, the only remedy is to proceed in accordance with Order 39 Rule 2-A of the CPC.” In view of the above, no further order is called for and the petitioner is at liberty to avail of alternative remedy as available in law. Disposed of accordingly. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 22.02.2011 mohan