IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 16TH AUGUST 2010 / 25TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 8707 of 2007(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- M/S.KOLLAM INTERNET CABLE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, BISMILLAH BUILDING, SOOCHIKKARAN MUKKU, PALLITHOTTAM P.O., KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER A.A.RAHIM. BY ADV. SRI.S.SANTHOSH KUMAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE CORPORATION OF KOLLAM, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF KOLLAM, KOLLAM. ADV. SRI.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/08/2010 ALONG WITH WPC NO. 21290 OF 2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.8707/07 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS: EXT.P1. COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REGISTRATION OF FIRM DT. 5.6.06. EXT.P2. COPY OF REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE DT. 13.3.06. EXT.P3. COPY OF JUDGMENT DT. 7.4.06 IN WPC NO.7792/2006. EXT.P4. COPY OF TENDER NOTICE DT. 26.5.06. EXT.P5. COPY OF RESOLUTION NO.3 DT. 18.8.06 OF 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P6. COPY OF NOTICE DT. 24.8.06 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P7. COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 26.10.06 OF TRIBUNAL FOR LSG INSTITUTION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IN APPEAL NO.342/2006. EXT.P8. COPY OF PETITION DT. 1.1.07 TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,J ========================= W.P.(C).No.8707 of 2007 ========================== Dated this the 26th day of March, 2008 ORDER Adv.Sri.M.K.Chandramohan Das, Standing Counsel for the Kollam Corporation requests for a modification of the interim order dated 15.3.2007. He submitted that on the strength of that interim order, the petitioner and M/s. Asianet are doing cable T.V. operation within the area of Kollam corporation without paying any charges to the corporation. They are indulging in illegal cable T.V. operations. Adv. Sri. S.Santhosh Kumar, counsel for the petitioner and Adv. Sri. Saji Varghese, Counsel for the 2nd respondent take strong exception to the submission of Sri.M.K.Chandramohan Das. Both of them submit in unison that neither the petitioner nor the second respondent are conducting any cable T.V. operations unauthorisedly within the area of the Kollam corporation. I record the above submission and permit the first respondent corporation to remove cable T.V. lines unauthorisedly drawn, if any, by the petitioner and the second respondent. Post along with connected case. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE H/o dvs