IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30456 of 2011(F) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. BINSU ALPHONS JOSE, PINAMARUKIL HOUSE, CHENGALAM.P.O., KOTTAYAM DIST-686 585. 2. PARVATHY.P.V., VYSAKHAM HOUSE, KARUKACHAL.P.O., PIN-686 540. NETHALLOOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SMT.AYSHA YOUSEFF SMT.MOLLY JACOB SMT.RABIA BEEGAM T.K. SRI.JOBI.A.THAMPI SMT.NITHYA SUGUNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM. PIN-686 560. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM-PIN-686 560. R1 & R2 BY ADV.SRI.T.A.SHAJI,SC, M.G. UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.30456/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATIONS FOR SCRUTINY ALONG WITH THE PAY IN SLIPS DATED 21-10-2011. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION ALONG WITH THE PAY IN SLIP DATED 21-10-2011. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR APPLICATION FOR SCRUTINY ALONG WITH THE PAY IN SLIP DT. 21-10-2011. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION ALONG WITH THE PAY IN SLIP DT. 21-10-2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 30456 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Engineering Course. They had appeared for the regular examination conducted by the University. When the result was declared, they had failed in the some papers. They applied for scrutiny and revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the scrutiny and revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the scrutiny of the answer papers within two weeks and the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for scrutiny and revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge