IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 10915 of 2001 Date of decision : 17.10.2011 Lal Chand ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana and another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Jai Vir Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D. Khanna, Additional A.G., Haryana for the respondents. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned counsel has submitted that since the term of Managing Committee has already been expired, so, the instant writ petition becomes infructuous, which may be dismissed as such. Learned counsel for respondents did not raise any objection, in this relevant connection. In this view of the matter, the instant writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous, as prayed for. October 17, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge