IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1742 OF 2007 Sayeed Ismail Khan ..... ...... ......Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...... ......Respondents. Mr.Anup Sharma, Adv. For the petitioner. Mr.S.R.Shinde, APP For the respondent No.1. Mr.Vinod Sharma, Adv. For respondent No.2. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 27/11/07 PC: Parties to this criminal writ petition are husband and wife who are separated by Talaq. The respondent No.2-wife instituted proceedings for claiming maintenance under the provisions of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. The trial Court by an interim order granted maintenance pendent-lite in the sum of Rs.1000/- to the respondent No.2-wife which order was challenged by filing revision before the Sessions Court by the petitioner-husband. By dismissing the revision the Sessions Court has confirmed the order of maintenance passed by the trial Court. Aggrieved thereby present writ petition came to be filed by the 1 husband. 2. During the pendency of the proceedings the parties have resolved the dispute by entering into settlement out of Court. Parties have also filed consent terms which go to reveal the settlement and resolution of dispute amicably. Both the parties have agreed to withdraw the proceedings initiated against each other. By placing consent terms on record a joint request is made by the learned advocate representing respective parties for disposal of writ petition in consent terms which are taken on record and marked `X' for identification. Parties are present in the Court and they confirm the consent terms to be true and correct. In this view of the matter writ petition stands disposed of in consent terms. 27.11.07 2