IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2010 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 9174 of 2010(V) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- M/S.TRICHUR TOWER HOTELS (P) LTD., T.B.ROAD, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR K.V.JAMES. BY ADV. MR.HARISANKAR V. MENON, SMT.MEERA V.MENON. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, 4TH CIRCLE, THRISSUR. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), DEPT. OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM. 3. INSPECTING ASST.COMMISSIONER, DEPT. OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THRISSUR. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.SHAMSUDHEEN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J --------------------------- W.P(C) No.9174 of 2010-V ---------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2010. J U D G M E N T The case of the petitioner is that, pursuant to Ext.P2 order passed by the Appellate Tribunal directing the assessing authority to pass revised assessment orders as specified, though Ext.P3 order was passed by the first respondent, the mistake was repeated; which hence was sought to be corrected by filing Ext.P4 for rectification of the mistake. However, without any regard to the actual facts and figures, the first respondent passed Ext.P5 following almost the same track; which made the petitioner to file Ext.P6 appeal along with Ext.P7 petition for stay, which are pending consideration before the second respondent. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, without any regard to the pendency of the said proceedings, coercive steps are being taken against the petitioner, which is sought to be intercepted in this Writ Petition. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4. In the above facts and circumstances, the second W.P(C) No.9174 of 2010-V 2 respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P7 petition for stay, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that till such orders are passed on Ext.P7 petition for stay, all further coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE //True Copy// P.A to Judge ab