IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16270 of 2008 PANKAJ KUMAR, SON OF SRI DEO LAL RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE & P.O. SIHARI, P.S. HASPURA, DISTRICT AURANGABAD. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DIRECTOR, PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AURANGABAD. 4. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISISONER, AURANGABAD. 5. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATI RAJ OFFICER, AURANGABAD, BIHAR. 6. THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER, BEER CHAND PATAL PATH, PATNA. 7. SRI RADHESHYAM SON OF UNKNOWN. 8. SRI SANJAY SINGH SON OF UNKNOWN. 9. SRIMATI KUMARI SHASHI WIFE OF UNKNOWN. 10. SHRIMATI NIRMALA DEVI WIFE OF UNKNOWN. 11. SHRIMATI URMILA DEVI WIFE OF UNKNOWN. 12. SRI SURESH PRASAD YADAV SON OF UNKNOWN. 13. SRI GAYA PRAJAPATI, SON OF UNKNOWN. 14. SRIMATI RUPA DEVI, WIFE OF UNKNOWN. 15. SRI PRAFUL SINGH, SON OF UNKNOWN. 16. RAMANAND PASWAN, SON OF UNKNOWN. 17. SRI DINESH PRASAD, SON OF UNKNOWN. 18. SRIMATI KIRAN DEVI, WIFE OF UNKNOWN. 19. SRIMATI SHILA DEVI, WIFE OF UNKNOWN. 20. SRIMATI NITA DEVI, WIFE OF UNKNOWN. 21. SRIMATI LALMUNI DEVI, WIFE OF UNKNOWN. 22. SRIMATI KIRAN DEVI, WIFE OF UNKNOWN. 23. SRIMATI LALITA DEVI, WIFE OF UNKNOWN. 24. SRIMATI ANJALI DEVI, WIFE OF UNKNOWN. 25. SRIMATI ANITA DEVI, WIFE OF UNKNOWN. 26. SRI NARESH BHAGAT, SON OF UNKNOWN. 27. SRI SURAJPAT PAL, SON OF UNKNOWN. 28. SRIMATI INDU DEVI, WIFE OF UNKNOWN. 29. SRI DIGVIJAY PASWAN, SON OF UNKNOWN. 30. SRIMATI LALITA DEVI, WIFE OF UNKNOWN. 31. SRIMATI SANJU DEVI, WIFE OF UNKNOWN. 32. SRIMATI SUSHILA DEVI, WIFE OF UNKNOWN. 33. SRIMATI SAVITA DEVI, WIFE OF UNKNOWN, ALL ARE ELECTED MEMBERS OF ZILA PARISAHD, ZILA PARISHAD, AURANGABAD, P.S. AURANGABAD(TOWN), DISTT. AURANGABAD(BIHAR). ----------- 2 12. 10.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parities. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the proceedings of the Zila Parishad, Aurangabad(hereinafter referred to as the Zila Parishad) dated 1.11.2008, Annexure-4 in which no confidence motion against him has been carried through by the majority. The proceedings are challenged in this writ petition on the ground that the requisition for holding the meeting of the Zila Parishad dated 18.10.2008, Annexure-1 is vague. 3. Having perused ground nos.3, 4 and 7, of the requisition, I am satisfied that the irregularities alleged against the Chairman and the Vice-Chairman of the Zila Parishad are specific and there does not appear to be any vagueness in the requisition. Petitioner having been voted out of office by majority, I am not inclined to proceed any further with the writ petition, which is dismissed. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)