IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 11TH MAY 2010 / 21ST VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14598 of 2010(Y) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- REV.FR.VARKEY.A.V,PRINCIPAL, (HSST POLITICS),ST.MARY'S HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KIZHAKKEKARA. BY ADVS. SRI.V.M.KURIAN, SRI.MATHEW B. KURIAN, SRI.K.T.THOMAS. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, CORPORATION BUILDINGS,PALAYAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (C) No. 14598 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T This writ petition has been filed on being aggrieved by the non-sanctioning of the staff fixation proposal made as per Ext.P4 for the period 2008-09. Ext.P4 proposal was submitted as early as in November, 2008 and till date no orders have been passed thereon, it is submitted. 2. Ext.P4 was, in fact, submitted before the 3rd respondent and the same was subsequently forwarded to the second respondent. The second respondent is the authority competent to look into the proposal made as per Ext.P4. It is evident from Ext.P2 judgment that, earlier, based on directions from this court similar grievances of the petitioner were looked into by the second respondent and appropriate orders were passed thereon. In the circumstances, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 staff fixation proposal, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) jma