IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2010 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 35337 of 2010(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- JOY ALUKKAS VARGHESE, AGED 52, S/O.ALUKKA VARGHESE, RESIDING AT AVENUE ROAD, CHELAKKOTTUKARA DESOM, CHEEYARAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK, REP.BY HIS POWER-OF-ATTORNEY HOLDER MR.P.P.JOSE, AGED 65, S/O.PAILOTH, PUDUKADAN HOUSE, KORATTY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT., REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE THRIKKAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, THRIKAKARA, KAKKANAD – 682 030. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KAKKAND, COCHIN – 682 030. 4. SASIDHARAN,VELUTHUMANAYIL HOUSE, THRIKKAKARA.P.O., COCHIN-30. 5. THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, THRIKKAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ERNAKULAM- 682 030. REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.P.NARAYANAN STANDING COUNSEL MR.S.SHANAVASKHAN FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: jvt ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C) NO.35337 OF 2010 --------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2010 JUDGMENT This writ petition has been filed praying for directing the respondents to take action on Ext.P2 complaint made by the petitioner. Allegation in Ext.P2 is that the 4th respondent is attempting to fill up a Thodu which separates the property of the petitioner with that of the 4th respondent and that the Panchayath is not taking any action in the matter. 2. When the case came up for admission on 25.11.2010, it was adjourned with a direction to the Standing Cousnel for the 2nd respondent to obtain instructions in the matter. Accordingly, the counsel has obtained instructions and it is now submitted that the Officers of the Panchayath have inspected the premises and have found that there is no filling up of the Thodu as alleged by the petitioner. 3. Now that the place has been inspected by the 2nd respondent and his findings are against allegations made by the petitioner, all that is necessary to record the aforesaid submission and close this writ petition and I do so. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE dmb