IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29249 of 2009 AMARJIT PASWAN, alias Azad Paswan, Son of Awadhesh Paswan, resident of Village- Bahrar, Police Station- Sasaram(M), District- Rohtas.............................................................................Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar......................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 4. 27.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. Considering the nature of allegation, the criminal antecedent of the petitioner in five earlier criminal cases as recorded in the case diary as also his involvement in this case surfacing in course of investigation of this case and that too soon after of his being released from jail on 19.2.2009 by taking part in the occurrence on 7.3.2009 in a bold and dare devil manner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner even though the substantive offence allegedly committed by him is under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and hence triable by a Magistrate. The prayer for bail is accordingly rejected for the present with a direction to the concerned trial court to ensure that trial of the petitioner is expedited and concluded preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If, however, the trial of the petitioner is not concluded solely due to laches on the part of the prosecution, the petitioner will be entitled for being released on bail by the court below itself on any reasonable terms and conditions 2 including his prompt day to day appearance before the trial court. U.K. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J)