IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.969/2010 Smt. Suresh Kanwar Vs. State of Rajasthan & others Date of order : 16.8.2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Ripu Daman Singh Naruka for the accused petitioner Mr. Piyush Kumar, Public Prosecutor Mr. Dinesh Kala } for the accused respondents Mr. Ajay Singh } ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for accused respondents and gone through the impugned judgment. This revision petition has been filed by the complainant against the judgment dated 13.5.2008 passed by the trial court, acquitting the accused respondents for offence under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC and the order dated 9.3.2010 passed by the appellate Court, affirming the order of acquittal. Learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the accused respondents pointed out that the revision petition filed by the State against the acquittal of the accused respondents has already been dismissed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 21st July, 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner has challenged the validity of the judgment of acquittal on various grounds and argued that on the basis of evidence available on record, the the offences alleged against the accused respondents were fully proved beyond reasonable doubt and they ought to have been convicted for offence under Sections 498A and 406 IPC. Having perused the judgment delivered by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on July 21, 2010 in S.B.Criminal Revision Petition No. 605/2010 State of Rajasthan Vs. Paramveer Singh and others, I find that this court dismissed the revision petition filed by the State Government by observing that perusal of the orders reveals that after considering evidence, order of acquittal was passed. The order of acquittal was challenged in appeal before the Court of Sessions which has considered the correctness of the findings arrived at by the trial Court and found the acquittal of the accused respondents to be justified. In these circumstances, I am not inclined to take a view different than that of the view taken by the Co-ordinate Bench. Consequently, the revision petition fails and is hereby dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. Thanvi