$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I.A.Nos.14312-14/2009 in + CS (OS) No. 626/2005 M/S VECTRA INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Amit Bansal and Ms. Surbhi Mehta, Advs. versus ATWAL AND ASSOCIATES & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Anil Misra, Adv. for D- 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL O R D E R % 16.09.2016 I.A.Nos.14312-14/2009 1. During the course of hearing, Mr. Amit Bansal, learned counsel for the plaintiff seeks time to file a reply to these applications. Let the replies be filed within four weeks from today. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed before the next date. 2. Mr. Anil Misra, learned counsel for the applicant/defendant no.4 submits that apart from the present suit, the plaintiff had filed a complaint under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act with regard to the cheques allegedly issued by the defendant no.1 firm (detailed in para 7 of the judgment dated 10th of May 2007). It is submitted that the applicant/defendant no.4 had CS (OS) No. 626/2005 page 1 of 2 contested the maintainability of these proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against him and by a judgment dated 26th November, 2013, learned Metropolitan Magistrate has accepted the contentions of the respondent and acquitted him from those proceedings. Let a copy of this judgment be also brought on record. Mr. Amit Bansal, learned counsel for the plaintiff also prays for time to take instructions on this aspect. 3. On request of the plaintiff, list on 4th November, 2016. GITA MITTAL, J. SEPTEMBER 16, 2016 aj CS (OS) No. 626/2005 page 2 of 2