C.R.No. 402 of 2010. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No. 402 of 2010. Date of Decision 13.05.2011 Charanjit Kaur Petitioner. Versus Davinder Singh alias Ladda Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present:- Mr.Rakesh Bhatia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Saurav Khurana, Advocate, for the respondent. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 2.12.2009 passed by learned Rent Controller, Amritsar vide which the petitioner's evidence was closed by order in spite of the fact that on the previous date, she tendered her affidavit Ex.AW1/A, but her cross-examination was deferred. It has been averred that due to sudden demise of her relative, she could not make herself present in the Court for cross- examination and consequently, her evidence was ordered to be closed by order. A perusal of the zimni orders placed on record shows that even after the impugned order dated 2.12.2009, the respondent- tenant has not produced any witness on 7.1.2010, 19.1.2010, C.R.No. 402 of 2010. 2 10.2.2010 and 4.3.2010. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that since the revision petition was pending, the respondent also could not produce the witness in support of his case. I am not satisfied with the explanation given by the respondent-tenant for not adducing any evidence. In any case, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, last opportunity is granted to the petitioner to lead her entire evidence on the date already fixed by the learned Rent Controller on payment of `10,000/- as costs. It is made clear that if evidence is not led by the petitioner and the costs is not paid, the impugned order shall revive and the revision petition shall be deemed to be dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 13.05.2011 JUDGE Anoop