IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12283 of 2008 BAHADUR MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.5.2008 Petitioner, Bahadur Mahto, is an accused in a cue instituted under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 427, 504, 380 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Heard the learned Advocate of the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State. There is allegation against the petitioner that this petitioner had opened fire from his gun as a result of which one Manoj Mahto sustained gun shot injuries. The learned Advocate of the petitioner submitted that as per Anenxure-2 of the supplementary affidavit, the petitioner has annexed injury report of Manoj Mahto which will show that fire-arm injury found on the person of Manoj Mahto was of simple in nature as the doctor did not find any exit injury nor any foreign substance was found inside. He submitted that the assault had taken place from both sides and the accused side had also sustained injuries at the hands of the informant’s side. Considering the submissions of both sides, petitioner (Bahadur Mahto) is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul, East Champaran at Motihari in Ramgarhwa P.S. Case No.20 of 2006. BT (Syed Md. Mahfooz Alam, J)