IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2011 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 4033 of 2011() ------------------------------------- CC.NO.2701/2006 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, KOLLAM CRIME NO.835/2005 OF KUNDARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT .................... PETITIONER(S): SEVENTH ACCUSED -------------------------------------------------------- BASHEER, SON OF UNEENKUTTY, RESIDING AT KALATHIL VEEDU, KATTUKULAM, MANARCAUD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNDARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/12/2011,ALONG WITH CRMC NO. 4036 OF 2011 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts CRMC.NO.4033/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER DATED 1/3/2006 IN CRMP. NOS. 1085/2006 TO 1090/2006 PASSED BY THE SESSIONS COURT, KOLLAM. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- Crl.M.C. Nos.4033 & 4036 of 2011 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of December 2011 O R D E R Petitioner is the 7th accused in C.C.No.2701/2006 of J.F.C.M.-I, Kollam. He is the 5th accused in C.C.No.707/2011 of that court. It is stated that there were so many other cases also against the petitioner. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he was regularly appearing in other cases and that because he could not appear in these two cases, the case against him was split up and warrant was issued against him. The fact that other accused in these two cases were acquitted is also pointed out by the learned counsel as a reason to consider the bail application that may be filed by the accused. The aforesaid crimes were of the year 2005. Six years were elapsed. 2. Now, the learned counsel submits that the Crl.M.C. Nos.4033 & 4036 of 2011 -: 2 :- petitioner is ready to surrender before the learned Magistrate within 10 days. The petitioner has to apprise the learned Magistrate of the reason for his absence on earlier dates. The learned Magistrate will consider all the aspects of the matter and dispose of his bail application as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. It is made clear that no direction is issued by this Court as to how the order is to be passed. These Crl.M.Cs. are disposed of as above. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt