2> IN THE HONABLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CIBIATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. W.P.No..............JA^.(..<r^............2005 taaaina Ef CTPRt .^^y ^>^-^ <^\\ 'y PETITIONER..................... Raman Singh Thakur aged 24 years son of Late Shri Shivram Dhurve, Sammvida Sala Sikchhak Verg - 3. Govt. Primary School Mundera Block Gunderdehi, District Durg (C.G.) Versus Respondent ..................... 1. The State Government of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary,SchooI Education Deptt D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) C3.V- -—^<-<,_rT '~""JS-?-"-'^V ^-e? j^s^^v9- 2. The District Education OfHcer, Durg (C.G.) Writ Petition uader Articles 226/227 of the Constitutionoflndia. XI-HC-22 'ssf ^i^iff.'i, ®Tnti'i6,(siciiuy sn^r^r )^IRi3TI^?T sh^i<t>y^ci ;^ .w..C/.?/.z..j&r ail^igwiWCTfsa' 6.4.2005 Shri Ajay Shrivasteva, coipnsel for the petitioner. +10^^ tllKdTfffe'4 <Rl^K ^arf^iTsn^T Shri Akhil Agrawal, Panel| By this writ petition undei] petitioner has prayed for regul^ Lawyer for the State. Artiele226/227 of the Constitution of India the r appointment from 08.7.2002 on the post of Assistant Teacher. The case of the petitiohe|r is that his father Late Shivram Dhuroe, who was working as Teacher at Govt[ Primary School Kaparmeta, Block Gurur, died in harness on 29.06.1999. The betitioner's father was the sole bread earner in the family and on account of spdden death of petitioner's father there is no source of income of the petition^r's family, therefore, the petitioner had applied for apppintment on compassio^ate ground. The petitioner's application was allowed and he has been appjsinted as contract teacher vide order dated 08.7.2002 (Annexure P-2). Fur^her case of the petitioner is that he ought to ^^e.^ut^-*®-' have been appointed on regulajr basis as per rKrtiSeatien No.F-7-4/2002/1-5 dated 10 June, 2003 issued| by the Ministry of General Administration Department, Govt. of C.G., Raipujr. Counsel for the petitioner ^rgued that as per sub-clause (3) of Clause 6 of the above scheme of compa^sionate appointment the petitioner ought to have been appointed as a regi|iiar employee and he could not have been appointed as daily wager or ad-h|oc basis or on the contract basis. Sub-clause (3) of Clause 6 of the said sch^me envisages that the prescribed 5% posts meant for compassionate appoin^ment shall be filled in by regular appointment provided the applicant is qualifie^i and against that 5% posts the appointment shall not be made on daily wage, ^d-hoc or contract basis. have perused the petition |and sub-ctause (3) of Clause 6. ?T<-rach \c\ 11NWI B)W*> W^ 200 ft^% sn^rw feraTsn^r sbtiwoRn ts... ^ Sfl^l BWIWfl^tT lidht Perusal of the petition it |s available and against that posts th^ the cireumstances, learned coun|s petitioner may be allowed to make] ali his grievances and also in the lig|l learned counsel for the resppndent^ Having heard learned coun4' facts and circumstances of the representation within a period of raising all his grievances and ii\ representation of the petitioner in points raised by the petitioner an^ 2002/1-5 dated 10th June, 2003 iss4 Department, Govt. of C.G., Raipur ofreceipt ofthe representation. With the direction aforesaid, Certified copy as per rules. dase <til<<Icl41-f W^vti tT fec&<^FKR ^sri^TTsn^r not clear that whether 5% posts were petitioner has been given appointment. In >el for the petitioner submitted that the a representatfon to respondent No.1 raising of said scheme dated 10.6.2003, to which has no objection. for the parties and having regard to the i, the petitioner is allowed to make a |wo weeks from today to respondent No.1 turn respondent No.1 shall decide the [accordance with law after considering the also in the fight of Scheme No. F-7-4 / |ed by the Ministry of General Administration |rithin a period of two months from the date tfie petition stands disposed of. Sdl- L.C. Bhadoo ('fld^lyil) •^