IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO. 3851 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO. 3851 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO. 3851 OF 2008 Vishal Krishna Pille, .. Applicant. Vs The State of Maharashtra, Respondent. Mr R.D.Suryawanshi, for the applicant. Mr J.P.Yagnik, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 20/11/2008 DATE : 20/11/2008 DATE : 20/11/2008 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard Mr.Suryawanshi, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.Yagnik, learned APP, for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.I-97 of 2007 of Manpada Police Station, Dombivali, Dist.Thane. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and eleven others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 302,307,147,148,332,427,149 of IPC and 3, 25(1), and 27 of Arms Act. 3. I have perused the entire material placed before me. There are ten eye-witnesses in the present case including the complainant. They all knew the present applicant and they have named him in their statements specifically attributing overtact to him. This itself is sufficient, in my opinion, to reject the application of the present applicant. Mr. Suryawanshi, learned counsel for the applicant, however, submitted that the applicant is entitled for bail on parity with Datta Darade and Stanlee John, the co-accused in the present case. I have perused the orders by which Datta Darade and Stanlee John have been granted bail by the Sessions Court. Though I do not wish to express any opinion whether the Sessions Court was right in granting bail to these two accused, in my opinion, the applicant is not entitled for bail on the principle of parity. The application is rejected. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)