IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10984 of 2010 YASHODA NAND GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22.4.2010 Heard the parties. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with R.P.F. Buxar PS. Case No. 56 of 2009 dated 18.4.2009 registered under section 160 of the Railways Act, 1989. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he is not named in the FIR. Only the unknown driver of the truck bearing registration No. UP-53T/3069 has been arrayed in the category of accused who is alleged to have caused damage to the railway crossing gate. It is further submitted that petitioner was not present there on the truck in question, and even if some damage has been caused due to rash and negligent driving of the truck in question, then for that also only driver could be responsible and not the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. Be that as it may, in view of the fact that petitioner happens to be owner of the truck in question and is not alleged to be present there on the truck in question, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from - 2 - today, the above named petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Ara, Bhojpur in connection with the above noted case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J. ) M.Rahman