IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4775 of 2010 1. GUDARI YADAV son of Ram Ayodhya Yadav, 2. Anil Yadav son of Gudari Yadav, 3. Chandeshwar Yadav @ Chaneshwar Yadav son of Ram Lochan Yadav, 4. Jogendra Yadav @ Mian @ Minya Yadav son of Ram Charan Yadav, All residents of village ahirpurwa, Police Station Arrah Towen, District Bhojpur, … …Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR… OPPOSITE PARTY For the Petitioners: M/s Ramashray Roy and Rang Nath Dwivedi, Advocates For the State: Mr. S.B. Rai, APP 3 17.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail earlier granted to the petitioners. The petitioners are accused in a case registered under sections 341/448/323/337/427/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that a compromise petition was filed in the court below and as such, they were under the impression that the matter had been duly compromised coupled with the fact that they had gone outside the State for their livelihood and under confusion and misconception they did not appear before the court concerned. It is further submitted that the petitioners have voluntarily surrendered before the court concerned on 05.11.2009. - 2 - Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the abovenamed petitioners, Gudari Yadav, Anil Yadav, Chandshwar Yadav @ Chaneshwar Yadav and Jogendra Yadav @ Mian @ Minya Yadav to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Bhupendra Singh, Judicial Magistrate, Arrah, Bhojpur, in Arrah TownPolice Station Case No. 125/98, G.R. No. 1061/98 (T.R. No. 554 of 2008) with further condition that one of the bailors must be either one of the parents or spouse of each of the petitioners. Further, the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date in course of trial before the court concerned. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates during such trial without any reasonable cause shown by them, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. SC (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)