1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL.O.P.(MD).No.12801 of 2011 K.Arumugam : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Chennai. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District. 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, *Pudukkottai Town. 4.The Inspector of Police, Thirukokarnam Police Station, Pudukkottai District. Crime No.78 of 2010. : Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to transfer the investigation from the third respondent to first respondent in Crime No.78 of 2010 on the file of the fourth respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Jeyakumaran For Respondents : Mr.P.Kannithevan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R *********** The petitioner's son met with an accident on 13.03.2010 involving a vehicle. A complaint was made by the petitioner and based on the same, a case in Crime No.78 of 2010 was registered by the fourth respondent police. But, the vehicle was not traced out. Aggrieved over the same, on an earlier occasion, the petitioner approached this Court by filing Crl.O.P(MD).No.13530 of 2010. This Court, by order dated 01.12.2010, directed the third respondent to monitor the investigation in accordance with law. Even thereafter, nothing has turned up, is his grievance. Therefore, he has come up with this Criminal Original Petition. 2. The fourth respondent has filed a Status Report, in which inter alia, he has stated as follows:- "I humbly submit that from my investigation, it revealed that on 13.03.2010 at 16.30 hrs, one TNSTC https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Town Bus No.13 was standing in the bus stop near the SOC. An tempo car belongs to Aravind Eye Hospital was standing behind the town bus. That time one four wheeler vehicle for handicapped attempted to over take his tempo car. That time one Tata Ace vehicle came rash and negligently in the opposite side and dashed on the handicapped four wheeler vehicle and escaped without halting. Sincere efforts have been taken to trace out the accused and vehicle but could not be traced out." 3. In view of the same, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thirumayam, *Pudukkottai Town, the third respondent herein, is directed to investigate the matter thoroughly and submit a final report before the jurisdictional Magistrate in accordance with law expeditiously. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar[RTI] AMENDED AS PER THE ORDER OF THE COURT DATED 23.01.2012 AND MADE IN MP[MD]NO.1/2012 IN CRL.OP.[MD]NO.12801/2011 Sd/- Assistant Registrar[AS] /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To To be substituted for the order already despatched on 14.11.2011. 1.The Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Chennai. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District. 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai Town. 4.The Inspector of Police, Thirukokarnam Police Station, Pudukkottai District. 5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 cc to Mr.J.Jeyakumaran, Advocate SR.No.1896. ORDER MADE IN CRL.O.P.(MD).No.12801 of 2011 10.10.2011 NB rl/6c – 11.11.2011 2P/7C RPB 09.02.2012 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/