IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO. 539 OF 1995 APPEAL NO. 539 OF 1995 APPEAL NO. 539 OF 1995 Smt. Manjula Rajendra Pandav.. ..... Appellant. Versus Rajendra Narahari Pandav.. ... Respondent. -: ALONG WITH :- SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO. 365 OF 1995 APPEAL NO. 365 OF 1995 APPEAL NO. 365 OF 1995 Smt. Manjula Rajendra Pandav.. ..... Appellant. Versus Rajendra Narahari Pandav.. ... Respondent. Ms. Gauri Godse for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 9TH DECEMBER, 2005. : 9TH DECEMBER, 2005. : 9TH DECEMBER, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : Both these appeals are arising out of matrimonial matter between the parties. The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant makes a statement that the appellant / wife, Smt. Manjula expired. In view of this, in such matters, there is nothing survive. Both these second appeals are accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)