IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3530 of 2011 KANHAI SHUKLA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is husband but as per prosecution case itself, the marriage of the petitioner had taken place on 24.05.2002 whereas, the case was lodged in the year, 2009 i.e. after 7 years of the marriage. Furthermore, I find that allegedly, the petitioner established illicit relationship with a girl of Delhi but the name of aforesaid girl has not been disclosed in the FIR. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that learned Additional Sessions Judge tried to patch up the dispute of the parties but the petitioner flatly refused to enter into compromise. The petitioner is languishing in jail custody for more than six months. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Kanhai Shukla be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 61 of 2009 to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)