IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 1157 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 29/06/2005 in WP NO : 9454 OF 1994 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 The Chief Engineer, ITDA (TW Dept) Hyderabad. 2 The Superintending Engineer, ITDA (TW Dept) SEction 8, Muvvalavanipalem, Visakhapatnam. 3 The Executive Engineer, ITDA (TW Dept) Paderu Head Quarters, Paderu, Visakhapatnam District. 4 The Dy. Executive Engineer, ITDA (TW Dept) Paderu, Visakhapatnam District. ..... APPELLANT(S) AND 1 The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Visakhapatnam. 2 B.V.Ramana Rao ITDA Dept. Visakhapatnam C/o. AVVS Radha Krishna D.No.47-7-40, Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.G.VIDYASAGAR The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) In this appeal the order dated 29-6-2005 passed in W.P.No. 9454 of 1994 has been challenged. The 2nd respondent-workman joined the services of the appellants on 24-10-1987 and he had been removed from service on 4-7-1991. His grievance is that though he had worked continuously for more than three years, yet the provisions incorporated in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 had not been followed while passing the order of termination. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Labour Court directed reinstatement of the 2nd respondent herein into service, which has been confirmed by the learned Single Judge. The order passed in the petition has been challenged in this appeal by the appellants. Looking to the facts incorporated in the award and the law discussed by the learned Single Judge, in our opinion, it is not a case where this Court would interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge conﬁrming the order of reinstatement passed by the Labour Court. The appeal stands dismissed with no order as to costs. ______________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ _________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 17th September, 2008. GRR