IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. RSA No. 235/2011 Decided on:26.8.2011 _____________________________________________ Revati Raman. …Appellant. Versus Shanta Behl. …Respondent. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the appellant : Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Harish Behal, Advocate. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). CMP No. 745/2011 Heard. In view of the averments contained in the application, duly supported by the affidavits of both the parties, the same is allowed. RSA No. 235/2011 It is jointly represented by the learned counsel for the parties that the matter has been settled amicably. The learned counsel for the parties have taken me through the terms and conditions contained 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 in the application. The same are accepted. Consequently, the Regular Second Appeal is disposed of in the following terms: i) The appellant shall handover the vacant and peaceful possession of the suit property, including godown, which is not the subject matter of the litigation, to the respondent- landlady on or before 30.11.2012; ii) The landlady is also entitled to a sum of Rs. 10,000/- deposited by her in the trial court towards the redemption of mortgage alongwith upto date interest accrued thereon. The landlady is also entitled to use and occupation charges deposited in the trial court with upto date interest; iii) The tenant shall not pay the landlady any other use and occupation charges which he has not paid to the landlady since 1994; iv) The parties are directed to abide by the terms and conditions contained in the application and the direction issued hereinabove punctually. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 26.8.2011 *awasthi*