IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.1377 of 2007 APPLICATION No.1377 of 2007 APPLICATION No.1377 of 2007 Manubai D. Vora ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr ..Respondents. None for the applicant. Mr K.V. Saste, APP for the respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C. DAGA,J. V.C. DAGA,J. V.C. DAGA,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 10.08.2007. 10.08.2007. 10.08.2007. P.C. C. C. 1. None for the applicant. Perused record. Heard APP. 2. This matter is pending since 17th April 2007. This Court vide order dated 18.4.2007 had granted interim protection. 3. On 19.6.2007 notice was issued to the added respondent no.2 (i.e. the original complainant) returnable on 25.6.2007. Liberty to serve the respondent No. 2 through Courier/Speed Post/E-mail/Fax was given to the applicant with direction to file an affidavit of service before returnable date. 4. The applicant has neither served a copy of application to the Advocate for the added respondent no.2 nor did apply spare copy to the Registry for issuing notice to the respondent No.2. Applicant did not file affidavit of service. Thus, order of this Court was not complied with. 5. With the result, office had notified above objections on 25.6.2007 and placed this matter before the Court for orders. This Court on 25.6.2007 continued interim relief which was operating in favour of the applicant and granted time to remove office objections. Inspite of grant of time Office objections were not removed. 6. Again the matter was notified on 2.7.2007 for non compliance of the order. Again one week’s time was granted. Thereafter, again the matter was adjourned and time was granted on two occasions i.e. on 17.7.2007 and 27.7.2007. Even then objections were not removed. 7. Today, the matter is listed on board. Nobody is present on behalf of the applicant. Till this date the office objections are not removed. Under these circumstances, the application is liable to be rejected for non-removal of the office objections and also for non compliance of the order of this Court. 8. In the result, application is dismissed. With the dismissal of this application, interim protection shall automatically come to an end. It would be open for the Investigating Officer to take the appropriate steps against the applicant in accordance with Law. (V.C.DAGA,J) (V.C.DAGA,J) (V.C.DAGA,J)