IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20452 of 2009 1. AKAL YADAV 2. BIRENDRA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.6.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This petition for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners, who are accused for offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, and 435 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is alleged to have assaulted with fists and slaps, whereas petitioner no.2 is said to have shot by fire arm, but there is no injury on any one. Learned counsel for the petitioners further states that the entire allegations are false and frivolous due to land dispute. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. In case of surrender/arrest within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in the court below, petitioners, namely, Akal Yadav and Birendra Yadav shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Khagaria in connection with Parbatta P.S.case No.72 of 2009 subject to - 2 - the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Narendra/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )