Civil Revision No. 8127 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 8127 of 2010 Date of Decision: 14.12.2010 Ashok Kumar Malhotra …Petitioner Versus Ashok Kumar …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Arun Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has wrongly noted the date as 27.11.2010 instead of 17.11.2010, therefore, the witnesses could not step into the witness box for their cross-examination. Learned counsel further submits that for this lapse, the trial Court, vide order dated 17.11.2010, has closed the evidence of the petitioner/landlord. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the view that fair play and balance of equities demand that one opportunity be granted to the petitioner/landlord to conclude his evidence at his own risk and responsibility. Accordingly, the present revision petition is disposed of by directing the Rent Controller, Panipat, to grant one short date to the petitioner, on which date he shall conclude his entire evidence at his Civil Revision No. 8127 of 2010 2 own risk and responsibility. For noting a wrong date, inconvenience has been caused to the Court. Therefore, the petitioner is also saddled with the cost of ` 5,000. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge December 14, 2010 “DK”