IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7621 of 2010 VIJAY BAITHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22. 03. 2010. Heard Mr. Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nityanand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in case instituted under Sections 304 (B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is husband of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in fact, petitioner was not present at the alleged place of occurrence on that day and main allegations are against other co-accused persons. Be that as it may, the petitioner being husband of the deceased, this Court is not inclined to accede to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and seeks regular bail, then same may be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. The court below shall also look to other materials which may be produced by the petitioner. m.p. (Birendra Prasad Verma,J.)