1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5915 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5915 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5915 OF 2004 Shri Mohamad Farukh Safrudin Shaikh ..Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. ----- Mrs. Pranali Kakade for the Applicant. Shri K.V.Saste, APP for the Respondent State. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. DATED : JANUARY 17, 2005 DATED : JANUARY 17, 2005 DATED : JANUARY 17, 2005 PC :- PC :- PC :- . Heard learned counsel for the parties. Having regard to the direct evidence against the applicant and seriousness of the offence, not a case for bail. I see no infirmity in the approach adopted by the court below in rejecting the bail application, in so far as the present applicant is concerned. The fact that accused No.2 has been enlarged on bail can be no basis to release the applicant on bail. The accused No.2 has been released on bail amongst other. She is the female and will be available for trial. In so far as the applicant is concerned that consideration cannot be invoked. Hence, not a case for bail. Rejected. 2 . The District Judge, Pune is however, directed to assign the trial to the fast track court to ensure early disposal of the trial, to be concluded preferably within six months. .....