IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 27TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3843 of 2011(E) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------- RAMARAJAN.K,AGED 58, S/O.KARUNAKARAN,ANANDA BHAVAN,PALAYATHODU MUNDACKAL VILLAGE,KOLLAM-691 001. BY ADV. SRI.B.SURESH KUMAR. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. PRASANNARAJAN.K, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.KARUNAKARAN,ANANDA BHAVAN,PALAYATHODU, MUNDACKAL VILLAGE,KOLLAM-691 001. 2. KESAVARAJAN.K, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.KARUNAKARAN,ANANDA BHAVAN,POLAYATHODU, MUNDACKAL VILLAGE,KOLLAM-691 001. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,KOLLAM, CIVIL STATION,KOLLAM-691 013. R3 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/02/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J -------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.3843 OF 2011 -------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of February 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:- i) An order appointing the petitioner, 2nd respondent or any person other than the 1st respondent as the guardian of the person and properties of the mentally retarded person Arunadevi, aged 63 years, D/o Karunakaran, residing at Ananda Bhavan, Palayathodu, Mundackal Village, Kollam. ii) To give direction to the person who is so appointed as the guardian of the person and the properties of the mentally retarded person Arunadevi, aged 63 years, D/o Karunakaran, residing at Ananda Bhavan, Palayathodu, Mundackal Village, Kollam., to submit a detailed statement of account with regard to the income from her properties and expenses being incurred for the maintenance of retarded person to the District Collector, Kollam. iii) Any other Writ, direction or order in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition was filed in view of the decision rendered by this Court as reported in “Narayanan Kutty Menon v State of Kerala” (2009(1) KLT 183). But, subsequently, W.P.(C) No. 3843/2011 - 2 - the said decision was reviewed by the very same learned Judge, which verdict has been reported in “Narayanan Kutty Menon v State of Kerala” (2009(1) KLT 910). In view of the above decision rendered in the Review Petition, the learned counsel submits that, the petitioner would like to pursue the remedy in terms of the decision cited (supra) and that no further orders are necessary in the Writ Petition. Writ Petition is closed accordingly. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE vdv