Delay Condonation Appl. No. 233/08 Restoration Appl. No.83/08 In WPSS No. 260 of 2002 (Old No. 14214 of 1994) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the contents of the delay condonation application as well as the restoration application. The reasons given in the affidavit filed in support of the delay condonation application are satisfactory to condone the delay in filing the restoration application. Hence, the delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. The reasons given in the restoration application are also satisfactory to recall the order dated 18.09.2007 passed by this Court. Accordingly, the order dated 18.09.2007 dismissing the writ petition in default is recalled. The writ petition is restored to its original number. This writ petition has become infructuous since the petitioner has already been promoted on the post of Head Master in compliance of the order passed by this Court. Therefore, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed and now nothing survives in the petition to be decided. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (P.C.V., J.) 19.02.2008 RBS