IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3358 of 2010 AJIT PODDAR @ AJIT KUMAR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 01.02.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse sections of the Indian Penal Code including Section 406 IPC. Allegation as per the complaint is that the complainant was defrauded by the petitioner and his brother and was made to part a huge amount on the plea that he shall be afforded a franchise of medicine. The amount was paid to the petitioner in cash and by bank instrument. Learned counsel places on record the order dated 4.7.2009 passed in the A.B.A. No. 337 of 2009 to show that the receipt of certain amount from the complainant stands admitted by the petitioner. The fact of the matter, borne from the record, is that the medicine as promised was never supplied to the complainant. Learned Sessions Judge has considered the case of the petitioner and found that the petitioners have prima facie committed breach of trust. This court is not inclined to admit the petitioner to anticipatory bail. The prayer is rejected. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )