IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.362 of 2009 Rashmi Kiran, D/o Shri Binay Kumar Sinha, W/o Sri Ratnesh Kumar Dutt Verma, Resident of H. No. A-89, A.G. Colony, P.O. Ashiyana Nagar, P.S. Shastri Nagar, Town & District-Patna ….Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Home Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Union of India, Ministry of Defence through the Secretary (Defence), Government of India, 101, South Block, New Delhi. 3. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 4. The Additional Director General of Police (CID), Old Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna. 5. The City Superintendent of Police, Patna. 6. The Director General (Personnel/EIB), Military Engineering Service, Engineer- in-Chief Branch, Integrated H.Q. of Ministry of Defence (Army), New Delhi- 110 001 7. The Director (W), B-Wing, Sena Bhawan, New Delhi. 8. The Officer-in-charge, Mahila Koshang, Kotwali Police Station, Patna. 9. The Officer-in-charge, Gardanibagh Police Station, Gardanibagh, Patna. ….Respondents ----------- 2/ 05.05.2009 Heard. Petitioner is the informant in Shastri Nagar P.S. case no.336 of 2007. The contention of the petitioner is that accused Ratnesh Kumar Dutt Verma has not been apprehended by the police even after rejection of his anticipatory bail by this court as well as the Apex Court. It is further contended that in spite of the orders of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, the police is not arresting him because one of his relative is a senior police officer in the State police. In the aforesaid circumstances, I direct the respondent no.3- the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna, to look into the matter and see that proper investigation/action is done in the matter. The respondent no.3 should see that a report be submitted in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate regarding the action taken by the police to apprehend the accused along with the explanation as to why the orders - 2 - of the court below was not complied with. If the investigation is not done in the proper manner, the respondent no.3 may consider to hand over the investigation of the case to any other officer. With the aforesaid observation/direction, this writ application stands disposed of. JA/- ( J. B. Koshy, CJ)