WP(C) 4735/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C. UPADHYAY Heard Mr. S. Haque, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. J. Abedin, learn ed Standing Counsel, Education Department, appearing for the respondents-Educati on Department. The grievance of the petitioner is that he was appointed as an Assistant Teacher of Bhogirkhola ME School by its Managing Committee, on 08.10.1984. The school w as provincialized in the year 1985 and, as such, the services of the teaching an d non-teaching staff were also regularized. However, unfortunately, the petition er was left out in the process for regularization of his service and accordingly he was put in the category of dropped teachers of the school. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that despite submission of seve ral representations, his case for regularization in the service has not been con sidered by the respondent authorities till date. Learned counsel for both the parties have submitted this is squarely covered by the decision, reported in Tapan Kr. Das & Ors. Vs. State of Assam & Ors. : 2008( 3) GLT 234. and similar relief may be extended to the petitioner in this case. In view of the above, considering the facts and circumstances, this writ petitio n is also disposed of in terms of the directions passed by this Court, in Tapan Kr. Das(supra). The respondent authorities shall consider the case of the petitioner in terms of the directions passed by this Court in Tapan Kr. Das(supra). This writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the above observations and dir ections.