^s^':^^ ?>'e6tT"" ^..••-•"" IN ^E"fflGH COURT OF CHEIATTISGAjRH BILASPUR W.P. (s) No. ...^.^......JIW^- Siddharth Chaure, aged^bout 43 years, son of Shri ChiMrabhan Chaure, Assistant Teacher Govemment Middle School, Chirchari, District Rajnandgoan (C.G.) PETrTIQNER : r' VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Throu^i Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) --"t.. r'.O' 2- District Education Officer, Chhuria, ^yf\'^ - District Rajnafldgaon (C.G.) ^' ' 3. Block Education Officer Block - Chhuria District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WMT PETmON U/A 226/2^7 OF THE CONSTITUIION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WMTS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FORQTHER SUTTABLE WRITSAND DmECTIONS The above named petitioner most humbly and ? respectfully begs to submitas under:- ffl_SlCQU8T_OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR MN6LE BENCy^^ HON'BLE Mft. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 464 OF 2007 Petitioner wrsus Resoondents Hemroi Kumbhkar Stdte of Chhatt'isgarh and o-thers WRIT PETTTION (S.) N0. 465 OF 2007 Petitioner Rewondents verais Siddharth Chaure StatB of Chhatt'isgarh and others WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 466 OF 2QQ7 Petitioner ftesoondents ywajs Panch Ram 5ahu State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETrTION (S.) N0 467 OF 2007 Pfetitioner versus Resoondents Manharon Lal Pftfiduro State of Chhatt-isgarh ond others WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 468 OF_2007 Petituner versus Resoondents Yaggaya Datta Baghel State of Chhattisgarh and o-thers WRTT PETTTtON t5.} N0 469 OF 2007 Petitioner : Shikx Khopereby versus Respondents : State of Chhorttisgarh ond o-thers WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0. 470 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Respondents Kadhey Kishun Pa-tel State of Chhatl-isgarh ond olhers Petitioner WRTT PETmON fS.) N0. 471 OF 2007 AAongonLal versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh and others WRTT PFnnON (5.1 N0. 472 OF 2007 Petitioner : bhal Smgjn Sonwani versus Respondents : State of Chhatlisgarh ond olhers WRTT PETITION tS.) N0. 473 OF 2007 - Petitioner Onknr Lal Sonboir versus Re^ondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and o'thers WRTT PETTTION (S.) N0. 474 OF 2007 Petitioner : Shiv Kumar Sharma versus Kespondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and others WRIT PETmON (5.1 N0. 475 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Rajendra Kumar Sogar State of Chhattisgarh cnd o-thers WRIT PETmON (S.) N0. 476 OF 2007 Petitioner Makhanlal Thakur vwsus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and olhers WRTT prrmoN (s.) NO. 477 OF 2007 Petitioner verajs Resoondents Fool Chand Kamleshwnr State of Chhattisgarh nnd o-thers WRTT PETniON (5.1 N0. 478 OF 2007 Petitipner versus ftesoondents Rajendra Kumar &e»»an9on State of Chhattisgarh and o-thers And WRTT PETmON tS.) N0. 479 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Jayant Kumar Shendey State of Chhatt'isgarh ond others Present : Mr. R.K. Jcusuwl, Advocate for Ihe petitioners. Mr. Sudiil Oubey, 6ovemment Advocate for The Sta-te/reqtondents. ORtSER 0>assed on 24th Day of January, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as leamed Sovemment Advocate appearffig for the State/respondents jointly aibmit that -the facts and question of la*» involved m the present batch of writ petitions are squarely covered by -the decision of this Court' m the case of YasfwMit Kumar Wuwwdwc^ vs. Mwric^al CorporaHwi, Duiy and wwrtM1'. 2. In subsequent cases. i.e., Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (jSopesh Kumw Kiniwvs. Tlw State Savt. af ChhattisgaHi and <motfm^ end o-ther connected matters, decided t»y-this ^u Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretcry, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and -the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examinoction. it was ctarified that the noflnenckfture of the Basic Truinirq Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been chamged and renamed as Diptoma m Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, Ihe D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 IjSafiedi Kumar Verma'ws. The Siate Sovt. of Mmttisgarh andonolhei) (Supra). 3. For the aforementioned reasons, Ihe writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of yasdiwcarl- Kumar BhafWthwj' (Supra^, aibject- to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquiwd B.T.I./b.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circuhrs dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 jand further whe-ther -they have been paid -two advonce mcrements or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of this order be placed on •the record of the connected writ petitions. ~ sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006CIDWJR-C696 Thakur