1 SSK/56 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1830 OF 2010 Mr.Jignesh Kantilal Shah ....Petitioner Versus Mrs. Julie Jignesh Shah ...Respondent Mr. Anil Joshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Hakim Sana, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 29TH JUNE, 2010. P.C.: By an order dated 8th April, 2010, the Petitioner was directed to deposit an amount of Rs.50,000/- towards the arrears of maintenance. This order was passed in view of the fact that the arrears of maintenance as of on the date of the said order was Rs.1,30,000/- and not a single pie was paid by the Petitioner to the Respondent and her minor children. 2. Today, the matter was placed for admission. However, the Petitioner has not complied with the order dated 8th April, 2010. On enquiry, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, after taking instructions from the Petitioner, submitted that the it is not possible for the Petitioner to deposit the amount as directed on 8th April, 2010. 2 3. By the impugned order which is challenged in the petition, the Petitioner was directed to pay an interim maintenance @ Rs.5000/- p.m., each, to the Respondent and her two daughters. Since the Petitioner has not paid any amount towards arrears of maintenance, I am not inclined to interfere in the petition. The petition is dismissed, as such. (R. V. MORE, J.)