IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.110 of 2008 MAHAVIR YADAV Versus LAXMI RAJAK & ORS ----------- 2. 19.12.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court refusal of amendment in the written statement and that too with regard to certain date based on Ext. B already adduced in evidence ought to have been not refused by the court below. This document in question which has been presented before this Court (Ext. B) itself goes to show the date of “`11 Agahana 1343”. Therefore, if referring to the said document and the facts there was a mistake in paragraph 15 of the written statement describing the said date to be “31 Agahana 1342”, the same was purely a typographical error flowing from misreading of the document. That being so, this Court would set aside the impugned order and direct the court below to allow the amendment in the written statement only with regard to the date in paragraph 15 of the written statement for recording the date of “11 Agahana 1343”. 2 This civil revision application is, accordingly, allowed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/