-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.253 OF 2008 Shri Pandurang Jagannath Jadhav : Applicant (Orig.Complainant) V/s. Shri Madhukar Sahebrao Jadhav & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.D.W.Bhosale for the applicant. Mr.H.J.Dedhi, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. ... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : APRIL 27, 2009. P.C. 1. This is a Revision Application filed by the original first informant challenging acquittal of the accused in a State prosecution for offences punishable under sections 325, 323 and 504 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the applicant, I find no merit in the Revision Application. The F.I.R. on the basis of which the prosecution was initiated was belatedly lodged after about 13 hours from the date of the alleged incident. The finding of the learned Magistrate is that the original F.I.R. lodged by -: 2 :- the applicant with Velapur police on 5.4.2000 was not produced and what was produced was the F.I.R. dated 18.5.2000. Apart from this, the learned Magistrate found material discrepancies in the version of the prosecution witnesses. In the circumstances, no case is made out for interference in this Revision Application against the order of acquittal. 3. The Revision Application is rejected. A.S. OKA, J.