IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19207 of 1999 Between: 1 S.Mohan Chetty, S/o. S.Seshaiah, Nagari, Chittoor District. 2 M.Usman Beg, S/o. Dastagiri Beg, Palasamudram, Chittoor District. 3 P. Ramachandar, S/o. P.Gangaiah Puttur, Chittor District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Chairman, Sri Venkateswara Grameena Bank, Chittoor, Chittor District. 2 Selection Committee, rep. by its Chairman, S.V.Grameena Bank, Chittoor, Chittor District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order, or direction declaring the Circular No.058/F.411/98 dt.13.4.99 insofar it relates to earmarking 50 marks for interview and 50 marks for performance appraisal and ﬁxing 50 marks as minimum qualifying marks for promotion to scale II posts and the consequential order issued by the Respondents in circular No.123/F.411/99 dt.26-8-99 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the statutory rules and set aside the above circulars and pass such other or further order or orders as deem ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.SRINIVASA MURTHY The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.19207 of 1999 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY 25th August, 2008 IBL