:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) 1726 OF 2006 TAX APPEAL (L) 1726 OF 2006 TAX APPEAL (L) 1726 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.250 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL (L)NO.250 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL (L)NO.250 OF 2007 WITH WITH WITH INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL 9 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL 9 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL 9 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Shukra Jewellery Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.R.Asokan for the Appellant. Mr.Jitendra Jain a/w.A.K.Jasani and Mr.P.C.Tripathi for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, S.J.KATHAWALLA, S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 15TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 : 15TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 : 15TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . For the reasons given in Income Tax Appeal No.983 of 2007 dated 15th September,2008, there is no merit in the above Appeals, as the same involve only findings of fact and there is no substantial question of law. Hence, the above Appeals stand dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)