IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5440 of 2010 SANJAY RAUT S/O PANCHU RAUT R/O VILL.- KALIPUR, P.S.- JASIDIH, DISTT.- DEOGHAR ( JHARKHAND ) Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 01.12.2010 Petitioner was taken in custody on 22.4.2009 when Belhar P S Case No. 39 of 2009 was registered under several sections of the Indian Penal Code including 384, 386, 307 etc. and some sections of the Arms Act. Allegation is that petitioner along with one Bangta Pandit committed the crime. Petitioner was apprehended by the villagers and also dealt with and thereafter handed over to the police. Contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that the principal accused has already been let off on bail. No doubt petitioner was an accomplish but he has no criminal history. Learned counsel has vehemently tried to impress upon the Court that his client has a changed mind and will not indulge in any criminal activity if he is enlarged on bail no and if he does then the present bail may also be cancelled. Taking into consideration the above facts and the period petitioner has spent in custody, let the petitioner Sanjay Raut be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka, in Belhar P S Case No. 39 of 2009. One of the surety will be executed by the father of the petitioner on due identification and the other by a close relation, whose relationship also must be indicated 2 by way of affidavit to the court below. Petitioner will appear before the trial court on each and every date either through himself or through his counsel. If he misuses the privilege of bail in any manner or he is found to be involved in any other case, then the prosecution has freedom to seek cancellation of his bail even in this case. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)