IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9669 of 2010 1. GOPALI PANDIT son of Govind Pandit 2. Murari Pandit, son of Gopali Pandit 3. Kailo Pandit son of Gopali Pandit 4. Luto Pandit @ Lato Pandit, son of Govind Pandit All are residents of Telwa Bazar, P.S.-Simultalla, Distt.-Jamui------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------------ 2. 21.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Though an attempt is made to involve the petitioners for the offence under section 3(i)(v)(x) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act also which only is non-bailable rather anticipatory bail is not maintainable but in the way right to take water from the well is claimed is not justifying sustainability of the claim. As per allegation, informant was prevented rather objected to take water from a well but that is not claimed to be a public well rather informant is claiming the well as her own alleging that same was taken in petitioners compound. No paper is there to support the claim of the informant over the well. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of communication of this order the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with SC/ST P.S. Munger case no.64 of 2009 , subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J. )