swam 35mg 0g” )@ @@ PETITIONER BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ‘ AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w.P.(S)No. wug of 2010 / Ku. Laleeta Thakur, aged about 19 years, D/o Shri Rewa Ram Thakur, R/o Village—Dighepur, Tahsil-Pithora, District—Mahasamund C.G.) VERSUS 1. (State of Chhattisgarh, Through :' The Secretary, Panchayat Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 2." Zila Panchayat, Bastar, through the Chief Executive Officer, Bastar, District-Bastar (C.G.) 3. (Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Darbha, District—Bastar (C.G.) 4. Janpad Panchayat Darbha, through the Chief Executive Officer, Darbha, District-Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ( w€CJ2Hv9W/£[ 200 mm (Wu) WWW WWW WW§§Q mmam i, h . an Shrivastava J mwm B : Hon’ble Shri Manindra 23.8.2010 Shri Harsh Mahant, coun el for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel L adVance copy. er for the State/respondent No.1, on Heard on admission. The petitioner has call in question legality and validity of communication dated 16.6.20 O (Annexure P—l) rejecting petitioner’s representation on the ground that the petitioner is not eligible and therefore not entitled to be app inted as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III. As there exist an altern ve and efficacious remedy of statutory appeal provided under Rule 13 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Shiksha Karmi (Recruitment 85 Conditons of Services) Rules, 2007, in the absence of there. being any eXt‘aordinary reason, f am not inclined to entertain this petition. Accordingly, this petition is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to remedy of appeal before the appropriate authority. The pendency of this petition shall be taken into consideration while considering application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. l Sd/— F Manindra Mohan Shrivastagay Judge i S M a e a i