CRP 263/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. NC Das, learned Sr. counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner, by the present petition, has prayed for a direct ion to the respondents not to put the property belonging to him to sale, on the ground that his application for one time settlement is still pending before the Bank in view of the orders passed by the learned Presiding Officer. It appears from the order dated 17-06-2008 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Guwahati that after the order dated 21-05-2008 passed in Application No.4/2007 vacating the earlier stay granted, a fresh proposal for one time settlement has been submitted to the Bank by the pr esent petitioner, which is under consideration of the Bank, for which the learne d Presiding Officer adjourned the case till 22-07-2008, on which date the case w as further adjourned till 05-09-2008 on the basis of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents that he will take instruction and make submi ssion on the next date on the fresh proposal submitted by the petitioner. To a p ointed query made by this Court as to whether any fresh application has been fil ed before the learned Tribunal seeking stay of the sale of the property, in view of filing of such application for one time settlement, the learned Sr. counsel has submitted that no such application has been filed after initial order of sta y was vacated in the order dated 21-05-2008. As observed above, the petitioner has prayed for stay the sale o f the property but without making such a prayer before the learned Tribunal. That being the position, the present petition with the aforesaid prayer cannot be entertained. The petitioner, however, may approach the learne d Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal at Guwahati with an appropriate app lication in that regard. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed with the above ob servation.