^€1}€T-S)^. (J) '^^SSQ^QQ^Q^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (Cl N0. Sg>Lf ^ / 2010 PETITIONBR ^^ ^3^' ^'y" M/s Chhattisgarh Agro Biotech Lab Raipur, Through ~ Its Proprietor Mrs. Mani Manjari Upadhyay, Aged about 38 years, W/o D.K.Upadhyay, R/o Aishwariya Residency, Telibanda, Raipur, Distt. Raipur-(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS , ^•^y^^ t 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department of Co-operative, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur- (C.G.) . :2. Chhattisgarh State Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd., Raipur, Through - Its Managing Director Raipur, Distt. Raipur-(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. ORANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDBR TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER "^".s^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K Aanihotri & Hon'ble Shri Radhe Shvam Sharma. JJ. W.P. tC} No.3843/2010 Petitioner Vs. Respondents M/s. Chhattisgarh Agro Biotech Lab Raipur State of Chhattisgarh and another. Present: Shri Sunil Otwarni, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Addl. Advocate General for the State/respondent No.1. Dr. NK Shukla, Sr. Advocate with Shri Shailendra Shukla, counsel for respondent No.2. ORAL ORDER (21.11.2011.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.2 had already paid the undisputed amount to the petitioner. Only there is some dispute with regard to other amount, for which, the petitioner may be granted liberty to make representation before the authorities. 2. Dr. NK Shukla, Sr. Advocate appearing for respondent No.2 and Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Addl. Advocate General for the State have no objection and expressed their agreement with the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. For the foregoing reasons, the petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sd/- R.S. Sharma Judge