IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.253 OF 2006. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.253 OF 2006. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.253 OF 2006. IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL SECOND APPEAL SECOND APPEAL NO.513 OF 1997 NO.513 OF 1997 NO.513 OF 1997 Vitthal Saidu Lokhande ..Applicant versus Machindra Kundlik Nale & Ors. ..Respondents Shri S.D.Thokade for the Applicant Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 3rd April, 2006 Dated : 3rd April, 2006 Dated : 3rd April, 2006 P.C. 1. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant. From the perusal of the record it appears that the Respondents are served. However, they are absent. An attempt has been made on behalf of the Appellant to explain the delay. In fact, it is not so satisfactory. However, considering the fact that the second appeal was dismissed for non removal of office objections, in the interest of justice delay is condoned on payment of costs of Rs.1500/- (Rupees One Thousand Five Hundred Only). Cost be paid in the office within fifteen days from today. On payment of cost matter be restored and thereafter within two weeks the office objections be removed by the applicant, failing which the matter shall automatically stand dismissed for want of prosecution. (S.R.Sathe, J.)