1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:13.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Crl.O.P No.13654 of 2011 1.Ammakannu 2.Maragatham ... Petitioners Vs 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai District. 2.State rep. By The Inspector of Police, D1, Police Station, Tallakulam, Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer:This petition is preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C to direct the respondents to afford necessary police protection to the life of the petitioners and for preserving the temple property as and when required by the petitioners on the basis of the complaints dated 07.08.2011 and 06.09.2011. For Petitioners :Mr.R.G.Shankar Ganesh For Respondent :Mr.P.Kannithevan Govt. Advocate(Crl.Side) ORDER Seeking a direction to the respondents to give police protection, for preserving the temple property as and when required by the petitioners on the basis of the complaints dated 07.08.2011 and 06.09.2011, the petitioners have come up with the present petition. 2.From perusal of the petition, it is seen that the parties, who are making counter claim are not the parties before this Court. Further under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the said relief in respect of the civil disputes cannot be resolved in this Court and they can be resolved elsewhere, not under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Hence, this petition is liable to be dismissed. 3.Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (T&P) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, D1, Police Station, Tallakulam, Madurai. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Vs ssk/28.10.2011 /4c-2p/- Crl.O.P.(md).No.13654 of 2011 13.10.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/