WP(C) 5520/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. R. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner as wel l as Mr. Buragohain, learned CGC. The petitioner who is an aspirant for the post of Constable (GD) in CRPF is aggrieved by rejection of his candidature on the ground of being med ically unfit. In the 1st medical examination, the petitioner was diagnosed as fo llows: 1. Varicose Vein 2. Tachycardia 3. Leukomytomia Thereafter the Review Medical Board has opined as follows: 1. Varicose Vein - NAD 2. Sinus Tachycardia - Present 3. Leukomytomia - Not present Unfit due to Sinus Tachycardia From the above, what is seen is that the previous medical opinio n in respect of item No. 1 and 3 was negated. However, in respect of item No. 2, it was opined that the petitioner was unfit due to Sinus Tachycardia. In paragraph 16 of the affidavit-in-opposition, it has stated th us: 16. That as regards the statements made in para 22 of the writ p etition, the deponent begs to state that though none of the Medical Officers of Review Medical Board were specialist for the deformity in question, the deformit y was so obvious that there was no doubt in diagnosis. Had there been any doubt, the board must have consulted the specialist. However, it is submitted that an MBBS degree is a graduation in all medical discipline. Further. The opinion and findings of the medical board were shown to the petitioner and signature obtaine d in token of having seen the proceeding to meet the end of justice. Considering the matter in its entirety, it will be appropriate f or the CRPF authority to constitute another Review Medical Board in association with a specialist doctor, may be from CRPF itself to conduct medical test afresh in respect of the petitioner. Let the fresh exercise be carried out as expeditiously as possib le, preferably within 30.6.2011. Depending upon outcome of such review medical e xamination, the respondents may take further necessary follow up action. Whateve r may be the outcome of such review medical examination, the results thereof may be communicated to the petitioner. Writ petition is disposed of.