IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-22901 of 2009 Date of Decision:- 22.10.2009 Piara Singh ....Petitioner(s) vs. State of Punjab ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH *** Present:- Mr.Mandeep S.Sachdev, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Amandeep Singh Rai, AAG, Punjab. Mr.Vikas Bali, Advocate, for the complainant. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. Counsel for the petitioner states that in compliance with the order dated 20.8.2009, the petitioner has joined investigation. Counsel for the State does not dispute this factual position on instructions from ASI Kulwant Singh, Police Station Kartarpur, District Jalandhar. Counsel for the complainant submits that the concession of bail be not granted to the petitioner as he had filed an affidavit to the effect that he is the only legal heir of the deceased-Pritam Singh, who is his father as well as of the complainant, while getting transferred the electricity connection of the tube-well in his name. I have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through the records of the case. The affidavit of the petitioner has been placed on record as Annexure P-1 which is alleged to be the one which has led to the Crl.Misc.No.M-22901 of 2009 -2- filing of the present complaint wherein it has been mentioned by the petitioner that he is the legal heir of the deceased. In the affidavit, neither it is mentioned that he is the only legal heir of the deceased Pritam Singh nor that there is no other legal heir. In view of the above, the order dated 20.8.2009 is confirmed, however, the petitioner shall be bound by the conditions as enumerated under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. October 22, 2009 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) poonam JUDGE