SM 1 28.wp.1309.09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1309 OF 2009 Central Bureau of Investigation ....Petitioner Versus Shri. Hari Singh Ranka and others ....Respondents ____________ Mr. S. K. Shinde, Special Prosecutor for the Petitioner. Mr. Shirish Gupte a/w Mr. Yashpal Thakur and Amit Jajoo i/b Paras Kuhad & Associates for th Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 6 and 12. Mr. Ashok Mundargi i/b Mr. Sameer Mohite for the Respondent Nos. 3, 5, 7 and 10. Mr. Girish Kulkarni i/b Mr. Amit Somvanshi for the Respondent Nos. 4, 8, 9 and 11. Mr. S. S. Pednekar, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM: B. R. GAVAI , J. DATED : 11 TH JULY, 2011. P.C.: By consent, taken up for hearing. 2. The Petition takes an exception to the concurrent orders passed by the learned Magistrate thereby allowing the applicants' application for discharge and the order passed by the Revisional Court confirming the same. 3. Mr. S. K. Shinde, learned Special Counsel appearing on behalf of the CBI submits that the Respondent/Accused are charged with a serious offence of submitting forged documents, in order to avail of the loan and as such the learned Trial Court ought SM 2 28.wp.1309.09 not to have discharged the accused for such serious offence. He submits that the same error has been committed by the learned Revisional Court. 4. Admittedly, none of the accused, who have been discharged are the officers of the Bank. The Bank has settled the matter with the accused by accepting the payment made by the accused. 5. The facts of this case are identical with the facts in the Criminal Application No. 2801 of 2009 along with other matter decided on 5 th March, 2010. 6. In view of the view taken by me, which has been taken on the basis of the various judgments of the Hon’ble Apex Court, I do not find that any perversity has been committed by the Courts below while exercising the jurisdiction. No case is made out for intereference. Writ Petition is Rejected. (B. R. GAVAI, J.)