1 wp857.09 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.857 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4379 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11385 OF 2010 _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | orders or | Court's or Judge's Orders directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri V.D. Gunale, Advocate for the petitioners Shri N.B.Patil, A.G.P. for respondent/State. Shri V.S. Panpatte, Advocate for respondent no.2. Shri D.R. Karnik, Advocate for respondent no.3. ..... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & SHRI M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Date : 16th June, 2011. 1. The petitioners have approached this Court, contending that they have spent a huge amount on running the hostel for students from backward classes, from 1999. They have claimed arrears of grants, which were to be given by respondent no.2. According to the petitioners, these grants were not extended to them only because, respondent no.2 was of the opinion that there was a dispute regarding who was in the management of the institution. It appears that the change report no. 1014 of 2008 filed by respondent no.3 has been accepted, in which respondent no.3 has been elected as an Auditor 2 wp857.09 and the names of the petitioners are no longer on the P.T.R. In these circumstances, the petitioners have no locus to file the present Petition. 2. Furthermore, in case the petitioners desire to recover the amount spent by them, they may do so, by filing appropriate proceedings and not in this Petition. Petition, therefore, rejected. 3. In view of the rejection of the Writ Petition, the amount which is deposited in this Court shall be refunded to respondent no.2. 4. In view of rejection of the Writ Petition itself, the Civil Applications are also dismissed. ( M. T. JOSHI, J. ) (NISHITA MHATRE, J) ga s/wp857.09