c .F-t°^- jC5' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARHV W.P. No. ^_I. /2001 Petitioner I. R. Bhosle, S/o LAX^-S- R- Bl^s,le\ aged about 58 years, R/o D-196^ R.M.S. Colony, Taygore Nagar., Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Respondents : ./A^l ^m . ^^y ^"^^ ^^^>"' ^•'^3' .-v' ^ <?^^. ^•.^- o^ Shri S. K. Nema, Circle Secretary, All India Postal Employee Union, Class - III, 53, Alok Nagar, Adarttal, Jabalpur (M.P.) Shri V. K. Agrawal, Acting Circle Secretary/ All India Postal Employee Union, Class - III, Ispat Bhawan, P.0. Bhilai Distt. Durg (C.G.) Shri R. N. Chowdary, General Secretary., All India Postal Employee Uriion, Class - III/Dada Ghore Bhawan, 2151/1, New Patel Nagar, New Delhi 110008 PETITION UNDER ART 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950 FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ORDERS WRIT OR DI- RECTION FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF LEGAL RIGHTS OF THE PETITIONER XI-HC-22 'B'^T ^TFTRT^, ^TfRT^, t^TTRy ^r tN^ ^Tit^T -i^iW^T W.P.No.955/2001 ?"^T^T^T?N ^N^^T ^TR^ff ^ ft^ TS^ZR IT ^rf^R ^i^r 11/10/2001/ Heard Shri A.K, Tiwafci, learned counsel for the petitioner an<3 Smt. K,M. Na^ak, learned counsel £or the respondent^ O R & E R The main relief soug is fchat the petitioner shou term as Office Bearer of th also for the said purpose, |at for in this writ petition ^d be allowed to canplete his ^ Unlon Interim relief 1s By way of interim order passed on 26/6/2001, the wrif petijbioner continued to remain as office bearer^ Operative p^rtion of the interim order passed on 26/6/200l reads a^ under: "Unfcll the nextj date of hearing, the irapugned order ^ated 21/2/2001 (Anne- xure P/3) and o|:der dated 30/5/2001 (Annexure P/4) In view of the said was given protection so fa it is submitted by learned hall remain suspended" ^ ^nterim order^ thewrit petitioner as his office is concerned^ Now iounsel for the respondent that the term of offi.ee of the w^rit petitioner has expired on 5th September^ 2001^ As su |;h, it JLs submitted that this isrrit petition has beccme in^ructuous as there is no other issue which survives consid^ratjon by tbis Court. [•^^f^ • •& o • ^^ -^.^^w^-.s. a».,=>^-=%.s^»s^;a^^^ ^^5a3^;^^-..a.^^^^.^....S^.^ 3TT^T *q^? ( ^f^^T ) .- ^T^I^T f^TNT ^l^l ^TjN'^l^ .•.V- ^\y rsnr* 3TI^l ^TcfTW^Hft^ • • ^* • • Shri A.K. Tiwari, submits that normally off. petitioner should oontinu^ Union^ under the relevanti regard< On the other han^l^ dent submits that electiojjl office^ On careful perusal writ petition and particu^ petition» xn my view comp^ the writ .petitior^r. Thej allowed by issuing furthe: for in the writ petition< in the office tUl the da^ 2001 and in fact by vifctijie tion issued on 26/6/2001, as office bearer till dat< to say that since the terifi no furtfaer relief can be a- In the result, thi^ infructuous^ '^!<4ld4lr1 TTR^ff ^ f^rT 'rf^R^R ^)' W^?.^ilt¥I earned coansel £or the petitiotaer ,ce bearers including the writ till ttae next election of the provisions prescribed in this l^ learned counsel for the responuft is to be condacted by the oircle of the averments made in the .•^ arly the relief sought in x,his ete relief has been allowed to efore^ no fyrther relief can be direction which is not pc ay ed ^he writ petitioner has continued -e of expiry l^e»» 5th Septe.mber^ of this Court6s interim direc^ the writ petitioner is continuing • It will be fair and reaeonable of offlce has already expired^ lowed^ petitlon is disposed o^ as Sd/- Chief Justice GRPRJ—FS/311—1 /2001—50,000.