IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 654 OF 2009 M/s. Forum Diamonds and others. ... Petitioners Vs. Bank of Baroda and others. ... Respondents Mr. S.M.A. Kazmi with Ms. Snehal Paranjpe and Mr. Prasad Das i/by Mr. B.P. Pandey for the petitioners. Mr. D.H. Mehta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rishabh Shah and Mr. Jayesh Patel for the respondent No.1. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 22ND JUNE, 2009 P.C.: The learned counsel appearing for the respondents have raised the objection in regard to the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground of statutory alternative remedy being available under section 18 of the Securitisation Act. 2. Without going into the merits of the case, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners wishes to withdraw this petition with liberty to take out appropriate steps under the law but specifically further with the request that they would like to make appropriate application also before the appellate authority praying for depositing the amount as contemplated under the Act. He further states that all the contentions including the question of limitation be kept open to be argued before the concerned authority. Petition is accordingly, disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. We make it clear that till the period four weeks from today, the bank would not take physical possession of the property in question. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.