1 D.B. Criminal (Parole) Writ Petition No.2322/2008 Naru. vs. State of Rajasthan. Date : 21.5.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. HON'BLE MR. CHAND MAL TOTLA, J. By Post. Mr.VR Mehta, PP. - - - - - Heard. According to the learned Public Prosecutor, the petitioner Naru wrongly stated that his second parole application was rejected. This fact appears to be correct from the averments made in the parole petition filed by the petitioner dated 29.3.2008. The petitioner's second parole application was allowed but with a condition to give two sureties. The petitioner stated that he is not in a position to furnish bond of two sureties and he may be released on furnishing one surety. The learned public prosecutor has placed on record the order passed by the learned District Magistrate, Bhilwara dated 16.1.2006. The condition imposed in the said order of submitting two sureties of Rs.1 lakh each 2 and personal bond of Rs.1 lakh appears to be absolutely unreasonable condition. The petitioners appears to be a member of Scheduled Tribe and imposing such a condition on him for his release on parole for 30 days on the face of it cannot be a reasonable condition and does not have any justification. Consequently, this parole petition is allowed and the petitioner be released on parole for 30 days on his submitting personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each and on other just and appropriate conditions determined by the Superintendent, Central Jail, Ajmer to his own satisfaction. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Ajmer will also gave a date for surrender. This order be communicated to the petitioner/ convict through jail authorities. (CHAND MAL TOTLA), J. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya