C.R No.18 of 2009 4.12.2009 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Pandey, counsel for respondents No.1,2, and 4 to 9. Tilak Raj predecessor-in-interest of respondents had filed eviction petition against petitioner under Section 14 of H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 which was allowed by learned Rent Controller on 30.3.2007. The appeal carried by the petitioner against the order dated 30.3.2007 was dismissed by learned Appellate Authority on 15.1.2009. The petitioner has now come in revision in this court against judgment dated 15.1.2009. The learned counsel for the parties have stated that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that petitioner is present in the Court. Similarly, learned counsel for the respondents has stated that respondents No.1,2 and 4 are also present in the court. The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition and he may be allowed to retain possession of the premises in question till 3.12.2010 and the petitioner shall hand over vacant possession of the premises to the respondents on or before 3.12.2010. The petitioner through his learned counsel has also undertaken to pay arrears of use and occupation charges within one month and petitioner shall continue to pay the use and occupation charges of the premises on or before 10th of the following month till the premises is vacated. The petitioner is allowed to retain possession of the premises till 3.12.2010 and petitioner shall hand over vacant possession of the premises to respondents on or before 3.12.2010 as agreed by the parties. The respondents through their counsel shall supply Bank Account Number to the petitioner through counsel within two weeks from today so that the arrears of the use and occupation charges are deposited by the petitioner in the bank account so supplied. It is further ordered that in case, petitioner shall not hand over the vacant possession of the premises in question to respondents on or before 3.12.2010 as agreed by the parties then the respondents shall have right to execute the eviction order dated 30.3.2007 affirmed on 15.1.2009 immediately and the petitioner shall also be liable for contempt of this court. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of. CMP No. 61 of 2009 In view of disposal of the main petition, the application is rendered infructuous. (Kuldip Singh), Judge December 4, 2009 (sks)