IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3949 OF 2000 Raghunath Sudam Shelke. ... Petitioner. V/s. Narayan Rama Shelke and others. ... Respondents. None for the petitioner. Tushar Mankudale i/b. Anilkumar Patil for respdt.No.18 A.I.Patel, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED : 20th January 2010. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. Perused petition. 2. Petition has already been dismissed against respondent Nos.4, 6, 11, 12, 15, 7(a) to 7(d), 2 and 8. The petitioner is claiming interest through one Rama Shelke. After the death of Rama Shelke, his legal heirs were brought on record. Petition has already been dismissed against one of the legal heir of late Rama Shelke. With the result, impugned order has become final and conclusive against the person against whom petition is dismissed. In the circumstances, in view of law laid down by this Court in the case of Sheela wd/o. Vijay v. Central Bank, 1998 (1) Mh.L.J. 928, petition is liable to be dismissed as abated since there cannot be two inconsistent orders in one proceeding. Order accordingly. (V.C.DAGA J.)