1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 176 OF 2008 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 176 OF 2008 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 176 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.1643 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1643 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.1643 OF 2007 Akruti Nirman Ltd., & Anr. .. Petitioners. vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. M.M. Vashi with Prakash Shinde i/by M/s. M. Dhruva & Co. for petitioners. Mr. K.K. Singhavi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. A.A. Purandare for Respondent No. 1. Mr. P.J. Jadhav, AGP., for Respondent No.2. Mr. J.G. Aradwad for Respondent no.3. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE: 17TH JULY, 2008. DATE: 17TH JULY, 2008. DATE: 17TH JULY, 2008. P.C. . The Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Necessary amendment be carried out within two weeks and the amended copy be placed on 2 record and copy be furnished to the respondents. The respondents are permitted to file their additional affidavits in order to meet the pleadings now incorporated by way of amendment. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) ( K.U. Chandiwal, J.) ( K.U. Chandiwal, J.) ( K.U. Chandiwal, J.)