IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Rev.No.2363 of 2009 Date of decision : 11.9.2009 Mrs.Seema Sehgal ....Petitioner Versus Mrs.Sangeeta Sehgal ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr.Munishwar Puri, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. This is a petition directed against the order dated 24.8.2009 by which the evidence of the petitioner has been closed. The impugned order shows that the petitioner was granted number of opportunities for producing her evidence but she failed to do so which led to the passing of the impugned order. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that if one opportunity is granted to him, he will produce his entire evidence. Having regard to the aforesaid contention, this court is of the opinion that the matter can be disposed of without issuance of notice of motion to the respondent as resorting to this process is likely to delay the proceedings further. Although there is no infirmity in the impugned order, yet purely in the interest of justice, one opportunity is granted to the Crl.Rev.No.2363 of 2009 -2- petitioner to produce her entire evidence at her risk and responsibility. The learned trial court shall grant her one effective opportunity only and no other opportunity shall be given under any circumstances. The petition stands allowed subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- as costs which shall be given to the respondent. 11.9.2009 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss