1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:22.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition (MD)No.13237 of 2011 K.Subramanian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Trichirappalli City Corporation, Cantonment, Trichy-1. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Srirangam Zone, Trichirappalli City Corporation, Srirangam, Trichy. 3.Pounnammal, W/o.Munusamy ... Respondents Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to remove the encroachments made by the 3rd respondent in T.S.No.1055, Vellithirumutham Village, Thiruvanaikoil, Srirangam Taluk, Trichirappalli District. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Rajendran For Respondents : Mr.P.Srinivas 1 and 2 ORDER [Order of the Court was made K.N.BASHA, J] Mr.P.Srinivas, learned Standing Counsel for the Trichy Municipal Corporation, takes notice for respondents 1 and 2. In view of order which we propose to pass in this writ petition, we are of the view that no notice need be sent to the 3rd respondent at this stage, as her interest also would be protected by this order. By mutual consent of the counsel on either side, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing at the time of admission itself. 2.The petitioner has come forward with this petition praying for a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to remove the encroachments made by the 3rd respondent in T.S.No.1055, Vellithirumutham Village, Thiruvanaikoil, Srirangam Taluk, Trichirappalli District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit though the petitioner has come forward with a larger prayer, he would be satisfied if a direction is given to the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 01.10.2011, and pass orders within a time frame. 4.Heard the learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 on the submissions made by the counsel on for the petitioner. 5.In view of the limited prayer now made before this Court by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the representation of the petitioner and without expressing any view on such a representation, is constrained to direct the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 01.10.2011, by affording an opportunity to the petitioner as well as to the 3rd respondent and also to other relevant parties and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall furnish a copy of his representation, dated 01.10.2011, along with a copy of this order, to the 1st respondent afresh, within ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. gb Sd/- Assistant Registrar[AE] /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.THE COMMISSIONER, TRICHIRAPPALLI CITY CORPORATION, CANTONMENT, TRICHY-1. 2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SRIRANGAM ZONE, TRICHIRAPPALLI CITY CORPORATION, SRIRANGAM, TRICHY. +1 CC TO M/S.P.SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE SR.NO.40924. +1 CC TO M/S.D.RAJENDRAN, ADVOCATE SR.NO.40852. Order in W.P.(MD)No.13237/2011 Dated:21.11.2011 2P/5C RPB : 25.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/