1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No.99 of 2007 (Ranjana wd/o Ashok Vitnor vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. D.R.Korde, APP, for the respondent/State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:11/9/2009 ... P.C.: 1. Counsel for the original complainant Ranjana called. Absent. 2. The matter was argued on the last date. The Counsel got it adjourned contemplating that the revision can be treated as an appeal for which she wanted to produce necessary amendment. 3. Having gone through the judgment under challenge, it is seen that the learned Judge has observed that the manner in which 2 the incident has taken place more leans to show that the sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix was consensual. 4. Skipping the aspect of consensual sex, I find, even otherwise, the evidence of sexual assault to the victim is not established; least, the abatement in terms of Section 306 of IPC to her husband to commit suicide, is surfaced. 5. The observations of the learned Judge about the consensual sex are removed. 6. There is no merit in the Criminal Revision Application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/99-07crra