1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 559 OF 2011 ( Amit Manikchand Roy & Ano. Vs. UCO Bank & Ors.) ........................................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................................ Shri S. V. Sirpurkar Adv for petitioner. Shri M. N. Phadke AGP for respondents. CORAM: B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & A. P. BHANGALE JJ. DATED: 4th OCTOBER, 2011. . We have heard Shri Sirpurkar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Phadke, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 at length on the last date and thereafter in order to avoid prejudice to either of the parties, in case we are required to record reasons, we adjourned the matter to today. Today Shri Phadke, learned counsel states that respondent no.1 had no objection if all contentions are kept open and matter is placed back before Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal for fresh consideration in time bound manner. He further states that interim relief as granted by DRAT may also be continued in same terms for said period. Shri Sirpurkar learned counsel appearing for petitioners who are legal heirs of deceased defendant no.2 has no objection. 2 In view of this, we set aside judgment dated 15.06.2010 in Misc. Appeal No. 219 of 2007 and restore that appeal back to file of DART for taking fresh decision after giving opportunity of hearing to the contesting parties. Interim order already operating during pendency of that appeal shall continue. Parties to appear before Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal on 15.11.2011 and to abide by its further instructions in the matter. DART to attempt to decide the appeal as early as possible and in any case by 15.01.2012. Needless to mention that all rival contentions are kept open for due consideration by Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. JUDGE JUDGE svk