p HIQH COURT OP CHHATnSGARH, BILASPUR 8.B.: HON'BLE 8HRI JU8TICB SUNIL KUNUUtNNHA W.P.fBI N0. 6059/200T PBnTIOItBR RBSPOIIDBHTS Kashiram DIiruw, S/oAnandRam Dhruw, Aged about 36 years Woiking as Patwari, at P.H.Mo. 98, Dharshiwa Tahsil & Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Stete of Chhattisgarh, Tlnui%h : The Secretaiy Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Coltector, Distt. Raq>ur(C.Q.) 3. Dy. Secretaiy, State of CUhattisgarh, Dcpartment of Revenue,D.K.S. Bhawaa, Reipur (C.G.) 4. Bhuneshwar Veniia, (VaQiex's name not laiown to fhe petitioaer) Patwari P.H.No.88, Pandarbhatta, Tah & Distfc RaipuT(C.G.) OONTBMPT PBTITIOM UHDER ARTICLB 218 OF THE COH8TITUTION OFINDIA Aipvwaaace: None for the pettdoncr. Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, Panel Lawyer for respondeut No. l to 3. None for respondent No.4 though served. ORAL ORDE» (13.07.2010) 8UMIL KWMAR 8IMHA.J. Sin.ee fhere is no representation on behalfofthe petitioner in teo rounds, fhis Court is left with no othcr option except to dismiss the petition forwant ofprosecutKm. Accordu^ty, W.P. (S) No.6059/2007 is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge