IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2010 / 30TH ASHADHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 934 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ INTERIM ORDER IN WPC NO.5536/2009 DT.19/2/2009 PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN THE WP ----------------------------------- N.BALAKRISHNAN,S/O.NARAYANAN,AGED 58 YEARS, AGRICULTURAL FIELD OFFICER(RETD.) RESIDING AT KUZHIAYYATHU VEEDU,MOONALAM, ADOOR PO, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S): RESOPONDENTS 1 & 3 IN THE WP ------------------------------------------- 1. SRI.DR.SURENDRAN,FATHER'S NAME AND AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, VIKAS BHAVAN,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SMT.OMANA , FATHER'S NAME AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SUB TREASURY OFFICER, SUB TREASURY OFFICE, ADOOR,PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT GOVERNMENT PLEADER, K.R.DEEPA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Contempt of Court Case No.934/2010-S ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 21st day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T The contempt of court case is filed aggrieved by the non-compliance of Annexure-II order passed by this Court in W.P.(C).No.5536/2009. The petitioner sought for an interim direction to disburse an amount of Rs.1,57,775/-. An interim order was passed directing the respondents to disburse the same, making it clear that if there is any valid objection in the matter, the first respondent will file an affidavit in the matter. Thereafter, the petitioner's liability was fixed as per Annexure III and Annexure-IV is a modified communication whereby the amount of liability is reduced also. 2. True that this Court passed an interim order as per Annexure-II but, now, what stands in the way of the disbursal of the amount is fixation of the liability against the petitioner. The petitioner will have to challenge the same in the pending writ petition and seek for appropriate interim order if the petitioner is entitled for the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that even the undisputed amount is now being disbursed. The said aspect will be considered by the respondent. The petitioner can seek appropriate interim orders in that COC. No.934/2010 -:2:- regard also. Leaving open the said remedy, the Contempt of Court Case is closed. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE