,n ¢ w? ,m we f 1N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATIRE AT—BILASPUR C.G WtP ONO. g1) é 0f 2003 / Barwgm g pHAGU LAL SULAKBE (pgL.sULAKHE) man-46 YEARS / sax: OF LATE st—mx PATTUJI SULAKHE posmn As wB memaaa AT-o/o SUB DIVISIm,pUBLIc aEALTH ENGINEERING uwmmmrmmmnemv n/o JAL TARANG pAaIsm,xAMLA OOLLEGE ROAD, RAJNMDGAm (c.G.) . 1. STATE OP CHHArTIsGARH REspoNBENTs Tammi-1 -mE SECREMRY, pvBLIc HEALTH mGINEEaINe DEPARTMENT,MANTRALAYA, ‘ D.K.s°BHAWAN,RAIpUR 2. EVGINEER-IN-GIIEF, PUBLIC HEALIH EVGINEEING DEPARTMENT, i‘ RAIPUR, CHHATTISHGARH WRIT PETITION LNDER ARTICLE -2 6 AND 227 OF mNSTITUTIw_ OF IkéalA‘FOR ISSUANCE OF WIT IN NATURE OF’MADAMUS. PROHIBITIUN OR SUITABLE ‘mIT OR “RITS. {QIREUTIW OR DIRECTIOVS, ORDER OR ORDERSe ? XI—HC-22 , wtzwv- am m mw/{g mm w 200 W mmm $WW Wm assxwm 14, 11.2003 Petitioner by Sbri R. S Pa B1, Advocatt. Stats by Shri Ranbir Singh, Govt. Advocate. Heard. The petitioner has preferrsd this petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. The main gn'evance of the peiitioner is that he is not being considered for promotion from the post of Sub-Engineer to the post of Eng‘neer. The petitioner was appointed as Sub—Engineer‘in the Public Health and Engineen'ng Department on 24.11. 1981. At present he is working as Assistant Engineer Current Charge of sub—division at P.H.E. Rajnandga‘on, / The petitioner was selected for the post of Sub-Engineerlon the basis of Diploma in Civil Engineering. While in service the petitioner had obtained a Civil Engineering Degree in the year 1988. As per the service rules a sub-engineer having Civil Engineer Degree is entitled for promotion to the higher post in a separate category as Degree Holder Engineer after ompletion of 8 years of service but the petitioner’s case is not bein considered for promotion for which he made a representation on 9. .2002 to the concerned Minister but even then the case of the petitio er has not been considered. Learned counsel for the etitioner submits that the petitioner “may be allowed to make detailed representation and the respondents may be directed t consider and decide the same, for which learned Govt. Advocate h s no objection. [113%w XI-HC‘22 counsel for the parties and having Having heam lealned regaltl to the facts and cimumstances of the case the petitioner is allowad to make a detaiied mpresentation to the Respondent No.1 Secretary to the Govt. who ' tum Win decide the representation within a period of 3 mon s from the date of receipt of the representah'on in an objective manner considering all the grievances of the peh'tioner by passing a asoned order. With the above observa 'ons this petition is disposed of many. Parties axe entitled for c‘jertiiied copy of this order. Sd/- L.C.BHADOO In. Judge WeW