IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.45432 of 2010 1. BHULLA RAI @ KAMLESH RAI Son of Rajendra Rai 2. Randhir Rai son of Siyasaran Rai Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 21.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioners was rejected by order dated 28.09.2010 with an observation to renew the prayer for bail after two months of receipt of this order if the trial is not concluded in a case under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are named in the First Information Report but during trial they have not been identified by the informant or his wife. He further submits that no witnesses have been examined after 28.09.2010. The petitioners are in custody since 10.02.2010. In the circumstances, petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Sitamarhi in connection with Sursand P.S. case no. 141 of 2009 (S.T. No. 297 of 2010), with the condition that they will not physically absent for two consecutive dates at stretch, till all the witnesses are examined, failing which their bail bonds would be cancelled. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)