Before Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisqarh a ilaspur t B Writ Petition (3-) No.>/${3 12007 PETITIONER Bali Ram Dewangan, Aged about 69 years, S/o Shri Bisambhar, gKgaC5V} M .,,R/o PostOffIce Slrrl (Kurud) awwkv Q/ Dustt. Dhamtan (C.G.) / e ry {7/&SPONDENTS Amid {newbie 4;w cwfob dcwf t7 2.00? o? ‘ Raipur (C G ) Accountant General Through: The Joint Account Officer Nidhi— 73, Raipur p. 1 Loo K om @W $ /, \[ Ky 2 Block Education Officer ‘ gié£Mfé9$ I 9g 19w“ Kurud Dlstt Dhamtan(C G.) NW Mk $ l c5 V» /‘//{’ / / OV WRIT PETITION UNDER ART!CLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIGN OF INDIA g VERSUS r \a w HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPU Writ Petition (S) No. 7143 of 2007 Petitioner Bali Ram Dewangan -Versus— Respaadents Accountant General 85 emothsr (Writ Pdjtion under Artic1€s 226 of ttw Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Somnath Vanna, Advocate for the. petitioner. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shri M. P. S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the reepondent No. . o R D E R (Oran (Passed on this 19th day of January, 201G) Heard. With the consent of the palties,the matter is heald finally. This case pertains to non-grant of retiral duesi pension. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed an application (I.A.No.2) that matter may be referred to the pension committee. 3. This Court, in the matter of W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh 8r, others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved The ‘ Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P.No.1961/2006 {Smt Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), and order dated 13.3.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated Slst January, 2008, passed in W.P.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. l Thakux: This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms iLe‘, the office of tho Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a pen'od of 15 days &om the date of receipt of a copy of this order as well as a copy of the peu'tion from the petitioner. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and ofiiceis concerned Within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after aifording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the ofticers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, may be completed Within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall supply one complete set of the petition to the State counsel for transferring the same to the Committee. Consequently, I.A.Noi2 stands disposed of. Sdk Satish K. Ag ihotri Judge