Cr’ L/IU‘G/f 1Q the Honble Hiq'h Court of Chhattishgarh _a_g Bilaspur (C . w.P.(s). No. 7 (1 5 2007 g2 Petitioner .../..(1) Ku. Rambha Sahu, Aged 49 Years, D/o Bharat Lal Sahu, Assistant/Teacher, ‘Govt. Primary School, Shankri, Distt Durg (CG) (2) Smt. Pournima Chandrakar, Aged 39 Years, I "' .e .- . Assistant W/o Shri Narendra Teacher Kumar Chandrakar, Govt. Primery School, Borsi. District Durg, C.G. 3) Mahendra Kumar Sahu, Aged 43 Years, S/o Late Shri Lakhan Lal Sahu Assistant Teacher, ‘Govt. Middie School, Kasari Post Dhangaon ’ Rajnanadgaon ( C.G.) > l (( v,%Q& / (4) Dwarika Prasad Sahu, Aged 41 Years g3» 0" My Assistant S/o Govt. Shri Midélle Lajja Teacher Schooi, Ram Sahu Dummar-Dehikala, Tahsil & District Rajnandgaon (C. G.) Versus Respondent .....,/ (1) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through:— Secretary, Education & Tribal Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / ,(2) The District Education Officer, Durg. (C.G. (3) The District Education Officer \ Rajnandgaon ( C. G.) / , Writ petition under articles 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of MANDAMUS.; / The petitioner, Above named, furnishes the particulars of the writ petition as under :- / ( \‘ Q// L ) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P, (5) No: 743 0f 2007 : Ku. Rumbha Sahu and ofhers Versus Pz'ritioners : S’ra're Governmen‘l' of Chhu‘t‘fisgurh Respondenfs and others W. P. (5) No. 744 of 2007 And W. P. (5) No. 745 af 2001 : Hamish Chandra Orsa Pe‘ri'rioner Versus Respondem's : Sm‘rz Governmen‘r of Chhaffisgar'h and ofhers SB: Hon'ble Mr. Jusfice Safish K. Agniho‘tri, J Mr. Ajay Shrivasmva, Advocafe for The pefiTioners. Mrs. Anju Ahujd, Dy. Govt. Advooqfe for fhe respondenfs/S'mfe. O R D E R ‘ (Passed on 8m day of February, 2007) 1. Leamed caunsel appearing for the pefifioners as well as 'earned Depuiy Governmenf Advocafe adpearing for The responden'rs/S‘fak joinfly submh‘ *ha'r 1he fac1s of fhe presen‘r case is similar +0 fha‘r of in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006 (Sushii Tiwari 6; ofhers Vs. Shh Govt of Chhaffisgarh & oi‘hers), which was allawed vide order dared 7m November, 2006. They further submi'f iha‘r fhe quesfion of law involved is also 1he some. 2. In view of 1412 above sTa'red submissions made by. learned counsel for 'l'he pavlies, 'lhe wril' pe‘l’lflons are allowed in Terms of ‘lhe order da‘l'ed 7*“ November, 2006 passed by has Com in w. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order as fa cosls. 3. A copy of 'lhis order be placed on record in connected wril' pelifions. f _ l Sdl- l Satish K.Agnihotri Bablu Judge l Petifioner : Satya Nnrayan Dewangan Versus Responden'ts : Smfe Govemmenf of Chhn‘Hisgnrh and others