IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 18875 of 2009 Between: Easala Koteswara Rao, S/o. Buchaiah, R/o. Q.No. 203, Sriramnagar Colony, Near ITDA, Bhadrachalam, Khammam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Khammam District at Khammam. 2 The Station House Officer, Bhadrachalam P.S., Bhadrachalam,Khammam District. 3 The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Developmnet Agency, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District. 4 The Sub Collector, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District. 5 The Tahasildar, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in interfering with the liberty of the petitioner and peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's property inspite of the endoresement given by the 3rd respondent herein and also trying to dipossess the petitioner by using police force from the schedule property is illegal, void and offends the articles 14, 19 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent herein not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner herein and not to take any coercive steps to vacate the petitioner from the property Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 18875 of 2009 ORDER 1 On 09.09.2009, this court, while adjourning the matter by ten days enabling the learned Assistant Government Pleader to get instructions, was pleased to pass an interim order directing the respondents not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner without following due procedure under law. 2 Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that he received instructions stating that the police are not interfering with the petitioner’s life and liberty. 3 Recording the said statement made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the police not to interfere with the petitioner’s life and liberty without following due process under law. No order as to costs. ------------------------------ 13.10.2009 kvsn