HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS) No. 3841 of 2005 Petittoner Smt. Padma Practtian, Age - 27 Yeara, Wife of Sho Mohan Singh Pradhan, Posted as Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary Schoot. Central Workshop, Korba. Residwrt of Subhash Block Minus. Q. hto. - C/104, S.E.C.L. Korba (East). District- Korba (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of ChhatGsgarh, Through the Secretary, Schod Education Department. Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ralpur (C.G.) 2. The CoHector O'ribat Devetopment) Korba, Through - Assistant Commisstoner, Tribal Development, Korba. Disfrict- Korba (C.G.). 3. Disfricf Education Officer, Educafion Dlstrict-Kort>a(C.G.) 4. Smt Amar Sheela Lakara. Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Centra! Wortcshop, Korba. 5. Smt L. Akka, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Central Workshop, Korba. SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihofri, J Shri P. K. Kesharwani, Advocate for (he p€*tfioner. Shri Sushjl Dubey. Govt. Advocate forthe respondents/State. ORDER ( Passed on this 14th day ofMarch. 2007) The following order of the Court 'fs passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. The petitioner white working as Assistant Teaeher at Govt. Primary School, Central Workshop. Korba was transferred to Primary School, Chhujdhodha. on the same terms and conditions, vkte impugned order dated 11.9.2(X)1 (AnnexureA/1). 2. The Madhya Practesh Administrathre Tribunal at Raipur vkte interim order dated 29.9.2001 directed to maintain status quo in regard to the positton of the petitioner as was prevailing on 21.9.2001. By virtue of the interim order the petitioner is continuing at the original place of posting. Thakur 3. Be that as it may, wtth Ihe passage of time this petltton has become tnfructuous as period of transfer is not applteable forever. At thls point of time there is no question to examine the vaBdity of the transfer order. However. the respondents are at Uberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in vtew the public interest and admjnistrative exigency, without insisting on compliance of the impugned transfer order. 4. It is weil settted principle of law that transfer is an incktent of servtce and it is for the emptoyer to deckte as to where a particuter officer/employee be posted, keeptag in view public interest as wetl as administrative exigency. This Court has Hmited jurisdictjon to interfere with the transfer matter and this Court can entiertain judiclal revlew only in the case of proved malafide, non-competence of authority passing the transfer order and fransfer orcter not being in conformity wifh the ruies and regulations. 5. In view of the above. this petitfon stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge