IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22433 of 2010 SHAMBHU SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.24537 of 2010 KAILASH RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 03.09.2010 Petitioners are languishing in jail in connection with a case registered under Sections 364A/34 of the I.P.C. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that after 15 days of the occurrence the victim returned and no ransom was paid and this fact has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the State. However, Mr. Abhimanue Sharma, learned counsel for the State submits that in paragraph 54 and 55 of the case diary, it has come that the victim was kidnapped with the assistance of these petitioners as the victim gathered this fact from the conversation of the main accused persons with the one of the petitioners on mobile. Mr. Rama kant Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Shambhu Sah has stated that petitioners have no criminal antecedent and a statement to that effect has been made in para 10 and 11 of the petition. 2 Considering the facts that the victim was never confronted with these two petitioners during captivity and has only heard about these petitioners through the main accused persons, let the petitioners namely 1. Shambhu Sah 2. Kailash Ram, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Semra(Chiutaha) P.S. Case No. 15 of 2010. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)