CRM No. M 34977 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 34977 of 2009 Date of decision: 03.05.2010 Sewa Singh alias Bittu Cheema ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Vivek K Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Mr. K S Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, on instructions from ASI-Parminder Singh, states that as per the Chemical Report of the Chemical Examiner, Punjab, an offence under section 376 of Indian Penal Code is found to have been committed. Further, the prosecutrix has made a statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, corroborating the allegations made in the FIR. Thus, no ground for grant of concession of anticipatory bail is made out. CRM No. M 34977 of 2009 2 However, in case, the petitioner appears before the trial Court and moves an application for grant of regular bail within one week, the same shall be considered and decided within one week thereafter. Disposed off as above. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 03.05.2010 mohan