IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Criminal Bail Application No. 398/2006 Ravinda Kumar S/o Hari ram Jat R/o Village Kaserwa Kala, P.S. Adarsh Mandi Muzaffarmagr District Muzaffarnagar Applicant. Versus State of Uttaranchal Respondent. Arising out of case crime No. 96/2006 U/Ss 307, 302, 302, 120-B, 201 I.P.C. P.S. Kotwali, Haridwar District Haridwar. Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. The applicant has applied for bail in case crime No. 96/2000, U/Ss 307, 302, 120-B, 201 I.P.C. P.S. Kotwali Haridwar, District Haridwar. Heard Smt. Pushpa Joshi and Sri Narmal Joshi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri R.P. Nautiyal, learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.G.A., and perused the record. It has been brought to my notice that the co-accused against whom the trial proceeded before the court of sessions, have been convicted. This applicant was arrested by the Delhi Police on 30-3- 2005 and thereafter he was produced before the Sessions Court by B- warrant. In View of the aforesaid circumstances, I do not find any justification to grant the bail to the applicant at this stage. The bail application is is rejected. However, I direct the Trial Judge to decide the sessions trial, which is pending against the applicant, expeditiously. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) Dated: 18-07-2006 ISB