IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2143 of 2008 ANIL VISHNU RAMAN, SON OF LATE RADHIKA RAMAN, RESIDENT OF 101 RAJAN RESEDENCY PATLIPUTRA, P.S. PATLIPUTRA, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus 1. SURJEET KUMAR SINHA SON OF LATE SHARDA PD. SINHA, RESIDENT OF 123, LOHIA BIHAR, SECTOR 9 INDIRA NAGAR, LUCKNOW, 226016. 2. AJIT KUMAR SINHA SON OF LATE SHARDA PRASAD SINHA, RESIDENT OF SAHU ROAD, CHHOTI KALAYANI, P.S. KALYANI, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. 3. SMT. VINITA CHOUDHARY, WIFE OF SRI RAJ KUMAR CHOUDHARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MOHABBATPUR MUBARAK @ DUMARI, P.S. MUSAHARI, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. 4. RAJ KUMAR CHOUDHARY SON OF SRI RAMCHANDRA CHOUDHARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MOHMADPUR MUBARAK @ DUMRI, P.S. MUSAHARI, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. ----------- 06. 12.05.2010 In compliance of my order dated 5.5.2010 counsel for the petitioner has been paid cost of Rs.2000/-, in the circumstances, show cause filed by opposite party nos.1 and 2 is taken on record. Let opposite party nos.3 and 4 herein appear in the Test Case No.02 of 2003 and the validity of sale deed dated 17.3.2008 shall be considered in the said test case as the sale deed was executed after 23.3.2007 ignoramus of the order dated 23.3.2007 and according to counsel for the petitioner is hit by the principle of lis pendence in view of the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act. With the observation aforesaid this contempt application is disposed of. Until matter is considered in the aforesaid test case, status quo as existing today be maintained. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.) 2