-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 140 OF 2008 Mrs. Pushpa w/o Jagdish Budheliya ... Appellant versus Jagdish Nanji Budheliya ...Respondent Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar for the appellant. Mr. R.D. Soni, instructed by M/s. Ram and Company, for the respondent. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & R.V. MORE, JJ. DATE: AUGUST 04, 2009. P.C. Today at the time of hearing of this appeal, the appellant and respondent along with their advocates are present. It is pointed out to the Court that the appellant and the respondent have settled the disputes and in view thereof parties have drawn up consent terms. Consent terms duly signed by the appellant and respondent along with their advocates are placed on record. The same is marked “X” for identification purpose. 2. Appellant and respondent admit that they have signed the consent terms after understanding the clauses contained therein. The parties are also identified by their concerned advocates. Order in terms of the consent terms. Parties to act as per the consent terms. The decree of the trial court is -2- substituted in terms of the present consent terms. Appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that as per clause 5 (iii) of the consent terms, the parties would apply to the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Board within 10 days from the date of registration of the gift deed for effecting transfer of flat No. 603, 24-A, Satyam Co-operative Housing Society, Mhada Colony, Powai, Mumbai-400 076, in favour of the appellant wherein she is staying at present. Along with the said application, these consent terms be placed before the MHADA authorities and we are sure that the said authority will dispose of the same in accordance with law expeditiously. However, it is clarified that in case the appellant find any difficulty in getting the name of the flat transferred in her name, liberty to apply. Appellant admits having received the pay order of Rs. 4,00,000/- bearing No. 562820 dated 20th July, 2009, today in Court. 4. Undertakings given in the consent terms be treated as undertakings given to the Court. Appeal disposed of accordingly. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. R.V. MORE, J.