1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 1092 of 09 Shri Ragho and anr v. State and anr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr A.Z. Jibhkate, Adv for petitioners. Mr A.G. Mujumdar, AGP for respdts 1 to 3 Coram : D.D. Sinha and A.P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 21st March 2009 1. Heard Mr Anand Jibhkate, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr A.G. Mujumdar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents no. 3. Grievance of the petitioner is in respect of functioning of the School i.e. Vidyanand High School, Tai, Tahsil Lakhandur, District Bhandara run by respondent no.5. It is contended that complaints were made by residents of the concerned village on the basis whereof, an enquiry was conducted by the Block Education Officer who submitted his report dated 5.12.2008 in this regard to the concerned authorities such as – Education Officer, Deputy Director of Education. Learned counsel 2 for the petitioner has submitted that in the said report the Blocki Education officer has clearly mentioned the illegalities/ irregularities alleged to have been committed by respondents no. 5 and 6 and, therefore, the Education Department ought to have taken appropriate action against the said respondents. However, since the Authorities have failed to do so, the petitioner has filed present writ petition for necessary direction. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already submitted representation in this regard to the Director of Education dated 16.12.2008 along with relevant documents, however, till this date, no decision has been taken by the Director of Education so far and, therefore, prayed that appropriate direction may be given to the Director of Education in this regard. 3. In the circumstances, we dispose of the writ petition with direction to the Director of Education (respondent no.2) to decide representation of the petitioner, if not decided earlier, on its own merit in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order. Judge. Judge. hsj