IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3115 of 2007 AMRENDRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 16.9.2009 The petitioner claims violation of the order dated 22.7.2005 passed in C.W.J.C.No.9448 of 2001 in which he was not a petitioner but the direction was to the authority concerned to consider the grievance of the petitioner as indicated in the order and issue order with respect to all eligible employees including the petitioner consistent to Annexure-2 and pay the monetary benefit thereof to all eligible employees including the petitioner. In the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no.5, the Superintending Engineer, North-Koel Canal Circle, Gaya it is stated that an order dated 11.8.2008 has been passed by the Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Aurangabad in which the claim of the petitioner has been considered and after assigning reasons has been rejected. 2 In the above circumstances, no case for proceeding under the contempt jurisdiction is made out. The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioner if aggrieved by the order dated 11.8.2008 may challenge the same in appropriate proceedings. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) spal/