-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRI. APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION NO.1241 OF 2007 IN APPEAL NO.756 OF 2005 Paneer Selvan Subramanyam Pille ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mr.A.Z.Mookhtiar Amicus Curiae for Applicant Ms.Usha Kejriwal APP for State ... CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : MARCH 24, 2008 DATE : MARCH 24, 2008 DATE : MARCH 24, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The Applicant is convicted under Section 302 of IPC for committing murder of Saida by stabbing her with knife. 3. There are two eye witnesses who implicate the present Applicant. They are P.W.1 Saraswati and P.W.2 Nimira who is the daughter of deceased Saida -2- and the Applicant. 4. P.W.1 Saraswati is a neighbour. She has stated that the accused stabbed Saida by knife on the chest, abdomen and waist. She has further stated that intestine of Saida had come out. P.W.2 Nimira who is the daughter of the Applicant was present at the spot at the time of the incident. She has stated that at about 7 p.m. her father came and asked her mother to follow her, however, her mother refused to do so, whereupon her father i.e. the present Applicant stabbed her mother Saida on her chest and abdomen. Her mother Saida fell down with bleeding injuries. Evidence of both these witnesses clearly implicates the Applicant. Looking to the evidence on record, we are not inclined to grant bail to the Applicant. 5. Application is rejected. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.]