IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12401 of 2010 RANJEET KUMAR JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 25.05.2010. Heard the learned counsel, Sri Ajay Kumar Thakur, on behalf of the petitioner, Ranjit Kuamr Jha who is in custody since 23.12.2009 in Kazi Mohammadpur P.S. Case No.214 of 2006 under Section 302, 307, 120-B I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Heard the learned A.P.P. also. According to the prosecution case, this petitioner along with two accused persons entered into the house of the informant and fired indiscriminately upon the informant’s brother, Satyendra Dubey and Pankaj Thakur and also on the son of the informant. They were taken to hospital for treatment. In the hospital, Satyendra Dubey and Kishan Dubey died. The treatment of Manoj Thakur and Pankaj Thakur is going on. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the informant is not the eye witnesses and he has learnt the names of the accused persons from the other persons. The learned counsel further submitted that the injured from whom the informant learnt the names has also not named the petitioner. On the other hand, the learned A.P.P. objected the prayer for bail and submitted that in fact injured statement 2 was recorded by the I.O. At paragraph 15, 16 and 17 witnesses claiming themselves to be the eye witnesses to the occurrence have named Ranjit Kumar Jha this petitioner. In the occurrence, 3 persons were killed. The allegation is indiscriminate firing. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this bail application is rejected. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)