1 cr-apeal-389-09-with jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPEAL NO. 389 OF 2009 Haroon Yameen Lohar ..Appellant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent WITH CRI. APPEAL NO. 609 OF 2009 Mohammed Rashid Abdul Malik Ansari ..Appellant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent WITH CRI.APPEAL NO. 612 OF 2009 Noor Mohd. Abdul Malik Ansari ..Appellant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent WITH CRI. APPEAL NO. 679 OF 2009 Abdul Wahid Abdul Jabbar Ansari ..Appellant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent .... Mr.Mubin Solkar with Ms. Tahera Qureshi Adv. for the appellant in Appeal No. 389 of 2009 Mr. Mubin Solkar Adv. for the appellant in Appeal No. 609 of 2009 Mr.Khan Abdul Wahab Adv. for the appellants in Appeal Nos. 612 of 2009 and 679 of 2009 Mrs. A.S.Pai A.P.P. for the State .... 2 cr-apeal-389-09-with CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE AND U.D.SALVI, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 10, 2011 P.C.: 1 Heard. These appeals have been filed by accused no.13, accused no.14, accused no. 7 and accused no.6 respectively in POTA Special Case No. 2 of 2003 and all the appeals impugn the order passed by the Special Court rejecting the applications for being released on bail. 2 The learned counsel for the appellants state that they have oral instructions to withdraw the appeals so as to apply for bail, afresh before the Special Court on account of changed circumstances. 3 Hence, leave granted and the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as is available in law. 4 We make it clear that fresh bail applications, if any, will have to be decided by the POTA Special Court on their own merits and without being influenced by the order for withdrawal of these appeals. [ U.D.SALVI, J.] [ B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.]