C.R.No.4628 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.4628 of 2009. Decided on August 18, 2009. Kuldeep .. Petitioner VERSUS Hem Raj and others. .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT Mr.Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) The application filed by the defendant-petitioner to summon the record of the plaintiff to prove his pleas seems to be pre-mature. It has rightly been dismissed by the trial Court. The application, at this stage, seems to be vague and uncertain. Fishing enquiries cannot be permitted on such allegations. No interference is warranted in the impugned order. The petition is dismissed in limine. However, the petitioner will be at liberty to summon any record after initiation of cross-examination of the plaintiff in . . . 1 C.R.No.4628 of 2009 context to the particular documents. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE August 18, 2009. rka . . . 2