1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2266/2010 IN F.A. ST. NO. 3594/2010 _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________ Mr. A.N. Nagargoje, Advocate for applicant. The respondent absent though served. CORAM : [P.R. BORKAR,, J.] PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2 No say is filed by respondents though opportunity is given. In the application, it is stated that the applicant had engaged advocate and the Advocate never informed applicant nor did take any step. Ultimately, it was found that the Motor accident claim was already disposed of on 5-11-2008. It also appears that on the face of it, the judgment suffers from error of use of 2 multiplier of 30, which is seen from para 15. Because of the latter reason, I am inclined to condone delay. Hence, the application is allowed. Delay condoned. Registry to register the second appeal. Dt : 22nd June, 2010 [P.R. BORKAR, J.] tsk/