1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL WRIT No. 1771 of 2007 JORE KHAN V/S STATE & ORS. Mr. MA SIDDIQUI, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 28.5.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel pressed into service with all vehemence order Annexure-1 passed by the learned Revenue Court on the petitioner's application under Section 212 Rajasthan Tenancy Act wherein a finding has been recorded on the basis of Girdawari about the land being recorded in the cultivation of the petitioner. However, on being specifically asked the learned counsel could not point out any document to show the land to be in the Khatedari of the petitioner while a look at the opening part of Annexure-1 shows that the suit was filed claiming the petitioner to be Khatedar and in possession. In that view of the matter, in absence of anything to show the petitioner to be Khatedar of the land in 2 question, I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition against impugned orders more particularly when Annexure-2, 4 and 5 are of June, 2006. It is again a different story that Annexure-4 is an order passed by the Revenue Court in the suit of the petitioner, and if the petitioner had any grievance against that order, the petitioner could have sought remedy in hierarchy of the Revenue Courts in accordance with law. Thus, taken from any stand point, I do not find any force in the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/