THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY Crl.P.M.P.No.9531 OF 2009 And CRIMINAL PETITION No.2375 OF 2009 ORDER: The de facto complainant and the first petitioner – first accused are present. The de facto complainant – Paichha Pallavi, is identified by her counsel Sri P.Bhaskara Mohan, and she also filed her voter card in proof of her identity, where her husband’s name is recorded as Chandrasekhara Raju, apparently by mistake and she states that the matter is settled out of the Court between her and her husband. In pursuance of the settlement, it is agreed that they would take divorce by mutual consent and that she would be paid an amount of Rs.7,00,000/-, out of which, a cheque bearing No.703731 dated 20.11.2009 for Rs.3,00,000/- is given today and balance of Rs.4,00,000/- will be paid within one month by way of a Demand Draft. The parties have exchanged their respective gold ornaments in open Court. 2. In the circumstances, as the subject arises out of matrimonial dispute, the proceedings in P.R.C.No.17 of 2009 on the file of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Parvathipuram, arising out of Cr.No.40 of 2008 of Jiyyama Valasa Police Station, Vijayanagaram District are quashed. But in case, the amount of Rs.4,00,000/- is not paid within one month and the divorce by mutual consent is not taken within six months from now, the P.R.C.17 of 2009 shall stand restored. 3. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition 2375 of 2009 and the Crl.M.P.No.9531 of 2009 are allowed. ____________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. Date: 20-11-2009 Rns