- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.6523 OF 2004 Mr.G.M. Savagave for the Petitioner. ----------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s appearances, Court’s orders order or directions ----------------------------------------------------- ¦ ¦ ¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. ¦ DATED: 6TH JULY,2005 P.C.: By the impugned order the court has declined to condone the delay, which is of 1526 days, by giving elaborate reasons. The court has found that the reason given by the Petitioners is false and that the Petitioners were aware of the pendency of the proceedings. An order either condoning the delay or declining to condone the delay is in the discretion of the court. Therefore, unless the writ court finds that the discretion has been abused by the - 2 - court, the writ court will not be justified in interfering with the order. Petition is rejected. ...