IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11686 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 23, 2011 Ram Narain Malik, ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate, for Mr.N.S.Panwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Despite directions, relevant rules have not been placed on record. Even if there is no rule formulated by the State Government for grant of second emergency benefit, the petitioner is required to make reference to the rules, which would regulate the grant of benefit of this service on account of second emergency. The petitioner may file a fresh petition after making proper averments in this regard. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition for the same cause of action. August 23, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE