1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO.497/2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.504/2010 (D) Ankit Jagdish Kela ...Versus... Smt. Parvatibai Ajabrao Kumeria Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. [Shri M.V. Amale, Adv. h/f Shri S.V. Bhutada, Adv. for applicant] [Shri S.G. Karmarkar, Adv. for respondent] CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 01.12.2011. Prayer for adjournment made by the learned Counsel for the applicant is rejected in view of the previous adjournments which were granted. This review petition is filed by the original appellant on the ground that the documents sought to be filed in the appeal were not considered while making the impugned judgment under review and therefore, there is error apparent on the face of record. Vide order date 7.3.2011, while dismissing the second appeal, this Court found that there was no pleading and evidence in the lower Courts about the waiver of loan from the Prime Minster's package in respect 2 of the appellant. In the absence of any pleading and evidence in the lower Courts, it was not possible to allow such a stand for the first time in the second appeal. In that view of the matter, I do not find any error with the judgment under review. Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw