IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 1468 of 1994 Between: K.Neelakantam, S/o.Sambaiah, 54 years, Business, H.No.6-11/3, Kukatpally, RR District ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Divisinoal Engineer, APSEB, Kukatpalli, Ranga Reddy District. 2. S.N.S.Developers, rep. By B.Chiranjeev Rao, Managing Partner, Hyderabad. (Writ Petition is dismissed for default against R-2 as per the Court Order dated 26-03-2004.) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction i) declaring the action of the respondents in trying to erect the transformer and draw the lines in premises No.6-11/3, Kukatpalli, without following the mandatory procedure contemplated under Indian Elecy. Rules, as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Art.14, and 21 of the Constitution of India; ii) direct the respondents to follow the mandatory procedure contemplated in Rule 17 of the Indian Elecy. Rules, in the erection of transformer in premises No.6-11/3, Kukatpalli; iii) Costs be awarded to the petitioner. For the Petitioner:MR.A.SUDERSHAN REDDY For the Respondent No.1 : MRS.M.VINOBHA DEVI (SC FOR APTRANSCO) The Court Made the Following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 1468 of 1994 ORAL ORDER: Having regard to the dismissal of the Writ Petition against respondent No.2 as per the Court Order dated 26-03-2004, nothing has been survived and no relief can be granted as against the others. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. ____________________ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 25th June, 2004 kvr/stv // true copy // Section Officer To 1. The Divisinoal Engineer, APSEB, Kukatpalli, Ranga Reddy District. 2. Two C.D.Copies.