IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1249 (SS) of 2011 Smt. Meera W/o Sri Manoj …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and another …Respondents Mr. Tumul K. Nailwal, learned counsel present for the petitioner Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned standing counsel present for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. Tumul K. Nailwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned standing counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Contention of the petitioner is that she was selected as Anganbari Karyakatri but she was not being appointed on the said post. Vide government order dated 24th February 2009, the District Programme Officer is the appointment authority. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage with a direction that if the petitioner moves a representation before the District Programme Officer, Udham Singh Nagar, he shall decide the same with a speaking and reasoned order within three weeks from the date a certified copy of the order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of finally. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) Dated: 16.09.2011 VKG