IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 112 OF 2004 SHRI RAJIV SARDESSAI,R/O ....Appellants LAMGAO,BICHOLIM-GOA. Versus BICHOLIM MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ....Respondents THROU'ITS CHIEF OFFICER Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Ms. S. Naik, advocate for the appellant. Mr. S. D. Padiyar, advocate for the respondent no.1. Coram:- R. M. LODHA, J. Date:- 17th August, 2005 P.C. Heard Mr. Lotlikar, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant. The finding recorded by the Appeal Court as well as the trial Court that the appellant was liable to pay rent from the date he was put in possession, does not suffer from any illegality. No substantial question of law arises. Appeal dismissed in limine. R. M. LODHA, J.