1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1823 OF 2011 Amol Ravindra Purohit ..Applicant. v/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr. Avinash Kamkhedkar, adv. for the Applicant. Smt. R.V.Newton, APP for the respondent/State. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 20th December, 2011 PC : 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 Applicant seeks to be released on bail in crime no.523 of 2009 registered with Pimpri police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 304(2), 323, 504 IPC. As per the F.I.R. lodged by Manda, who is the mother of the present applicant and the widow of the deceased shows that the applicant had taken an amount of Rs.50,000/- from his father for purchase of Pago Auto Rickshaw. As he could not get any guarantor for the remaining amount, on 11.12.2009 at about 4.30 p.m., he asked his father to give him more money, which he refused to give. Due to this, the accused got annoyed and began to beat his father with hands. His father was sitting on an iron cot at that time. When the applicant was beating his father with 2 hands, his father lost his balance and fell from the cot on the ground and suffered injuries on the head and left ear and became unconscious. Immediately, accused himself took his father to the hospital and got him admitted. After six days, he died. The P.M. Report reveals that the deceased had suffered three minor injuries on different parts of the body. Heamatoma was seen over left fronto parietal region. It was opined that he had died because of the complications of the head injury, which was allegedly caused due to fall on the ground from the cot. Applicant had only given slaps and fist blows and nothing more. Applicant is in custody for the last about two years. The learned counsel for the applicant states that charge was framed in January, 2011 but no further progress has taken place in the case. 3 Taking into consideration the material noted above, accused be released on his executing PR of Rs.15,000/- with surety in the like amount with condition that he shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)