CWP No.10094 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C. W. P. No. 10094 of 2010 Date of Decision: 29 - 7 - 2010 Rajinder Singh and another ....Petitioners v. State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA *** Present: Mr.Ashwani Prashar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.J.S.Puri, Addl.A.G., Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.A.S.Khaira, Advocate for respondents No.5 and 6. *** KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Bhag Singh, Manager of the Ropar Central Cooperative Bank Ltd., Ropar (hereinafter to be referred as, `the respondent-Bank') had embezzled the amount of the Bank. The stand of the respondent-Bank is that Bhag Singh out of the embezzled amount, prepared FDRs in the names of Rajinder Singh and Karnail Kaur but no amount was deposited by them. The revisional authority in the revision petition preferred by the petitioners held as under:- “Therefore, I revoke the order dated 6.10.2008 passed by Joint CWP No.10094 of 2010 [2] Registrar and direct the Bank that the amount of Bank, which is embezzled by Bhag Singh, for the recovery of the same amount, his land, which was attached on 28.11.2001, the only portion of that land may be sold with which the embezzled amount of the Bank can be recovered. If after selling the whole land, there remains any recoverable amount, then the F.D.R., in which name of Bhag Singh is mentioned and have been attached by the Bank, due amount of that F.D.R. may also be adjusted in the embezzled amount which is due towards Bhag Singh. If then also remains any amount unrecovered, then that may be recovered by attaching the salary of his son, because, Manpreet Singh, son of Bhag Singh is legal heir of the moveable and immovable property of his father. This action may be completed within three months. F.D.R. Of Rajinder Singh and Karnail Kaur may not be released, until and unless the entire recovery outstanding against Bhag Singh is not recovered. Only on receipt of entire recovery, the amount of this F.D.R. alongwith the due interest money, may be released. Both the revision petitions are disposed off by this order....” Vide separate orders of even date passed in Civil Writ Petition No.369 of 2010, titled as `Paramjit Kaur v. Secretary, Cooperation Department, Punjab and others' and Civil Writ Petition No.704 of 2010, titled as `Manpreet Singh v. Secretary, Cooperation Department, Punjab and others, preferred by legal heirs of Bhag Singh, a direction has been issued to the Appellate Authority to decide their appeals within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of that order. The findings of the CWP No.10094 of 2010 [3] Appellate Authority in the appeals filed by Paramjit Kaur and Manpreet Singh will have a bearing on the outcome of the present writ petition. Hence, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach this Court, after the decision of appeals preferred by Paramjit Kaur and Manpreet Singh. ( KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA ) July 29, 2010. JUDGE RC