6 /~- €_^ -ysr In Re. Petitioner ^tA ^^ ^s^ ^y' ^?< ResDondente (1) IN THE HON'BLE HIGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE EORCHHATTISGARH ATBIl.ASPUR WRITPETITION (PILlNo. S&S^ of2009 In the matter of mismanagement of Chhattisgarh Netra Chikitsa Samiti Telibandha Raipur a registered soGiety dependent on state largesse being run as a private fiefdom of unauthorised persons. Ghhattjsgarh Netra Chikitsalaya Karmacharj Sangh through Secretary Shatrughan Verma C/o Ganpati S.T.D. P.G.O. and Photocopy Centre Telibandha Raipur<C.G.) Versus Chhattisgarh Netra Chikitsa Samiti Telibandha Raipur through Presiderit being Collector Raipur(C.G.) Dr. H.L. Dua Treasurer, Chhattisgarh Netrai Chikifsa Samiti resident of Pandri Raipyr (C.G.) Joint Director Healthl Services Raipur in^ hisi capacity as Vice Presidenti ChhattisgarM Netra Chikitsa Samiti Raipur (C-G-) i Smt. Ranjana Mehra W/o Late Vijay Mehra; Chhattisgarh Netra] <3Bikitsa Samiti,^ Telibandha Raipur(C.G.) 1 (2) (3) (4) /(6) ^(5) Commissioner of Incori'ie Tax Central Revenue Buitding Civil Lines, Raipur(C.G.) Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Block D, Sector No. , 32 Indira Gandhi Commercial Complex, Pandri, Raipur (C.G.) ,(7) Assistant Registrar Firms and Societies 0-5, Anupam Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) ^(8) Commissioner Raipur as Patron ChhattisgarhNetra Chiktsa Samiti, Raipur (C.G.) Before: Hon'ble The Chief Justice and his comDahion iudaes of the Hon'ble Hiah CQurt ofjydicatyre for Chhattisaarh at BilasDur. ^ i-HC—"S. ~s^f "•i!^!Tf<u, ••s^.ww, wvwy . ^ HI*1P(Tsh*l|c»» \ * 1- ^ni^.^^l^l^ ^••'•••--^200 ^l rW!w' rs~"v 'q- *IT^I 3'liN? HI@F eiBR^©FCHHATTI^GARhT^fB^ Coram: Hon'bleShri Dhi Hon' ble Shri R.N Writ Petition (PIL) Nb. 3225 of 2009 Retitioner j l^espondents Vs. Chh^ttisgarh Netra Chikitsalaya Karnlachari Sangh through Secretary fughan Verma, C/o. Ganpati .P.C.O. and Photocopy Centre, Telib^ndha, Raipur (CG). Shat S.T.a> (3) Joint Chhd Fc^ Tf^l endra Mishra, & Chandrakar, JJ (1) Chh^ttisgarh Netra Chikitsa Samiti Telib^ndha, Raipur through President bein^ Collector Raipur(CG). (2) Dr. ^.L. Dua, Treasurer, Chhattisgarh Netr^ Chikitsa Samiti, resident of Pancjri, Raipur (CG). Director, Health Services Raipur, in h|is capacity as ttisgarh Netra Vice President Chikitsa Samiti Raippr (CG). (4) Smt.jRanjana Mehra, W/o. Late Vijay Meh(ra, Chhattisgarh Netra Chikitsa Sam|ti, Telibandha, Raipur (CG). (5) Com|nissioner of Income Tax, Central Rev^nue Building Civil Lines, Raipur (CG)| (6) Assi^tant Provident Fund Comhissioner, Block -D, Sector No.3j2, Indira Gandhi Commercial Comblex, Pandri, Raipur (CG). (7) Assi^tant Registrar Firms and Sopdieties, 0-5, Anupam Nagar, Raipur (CG). (8) Comhnissioner, Raipur, as Patron Chh^ttisgarh Netra Chiktsa Samiti, RaipUr (CG). Stfe^, •^.- .^^::'\ •"csys.^j g &' ;x '•'^:~ ^ ;1-HC—78 ^Tri -M!<ii<'i^. ^~'t!-'-"i'G, !®i<ni-'-iy HI*1CTI %T1I^ °°P (^Pi Ll l^o- S2-2i f^""""""" •""""7"' ""•""^200£) 1S- s:T*^ q? T"'TT :''^T 3?T^T 5^-11 <^i Rresent: Oral Orijler (Passed on this 8t|1 July, 2009) fferDhirendra Mishra, J. TODwawr'aiT^i t^'ri{mj4i?i T-fW^l ^t VSV^ O'^^ri.X (Writ Petition under Article226 c Shri Neelabh Dubey, counselfor Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additional Shri S. Rajeshwar Rao, counsel .•3- ^ 3ifOT 3^V fthe Constitution of India) (he petitioner. ^dvocate General for the State. the respondent No.5. Heard on I.A.No.6. Not opposed. Application is allowed and docurrjewnts are taken on record. The writ petitioner claiming t6 be| the Secretary of the Chhattisgarh t*|etra Chikitsalaya Karmachari Sang|i, has filed this public interest Ijtigation petition and prays for dissolvjng the committees and removing the officials of the Chhattisgasrh Netra (phikitsa Samiti, which is registered ijnder Chhattisgarh Society Registrik^ran Adhiniyam 1973, apart from jther reliefs. Shri Neelabh Dubey, learned COL| 4n enquiry Was ordered by the Collecj insel for the petitioner submits that tor to enquire into the allegations ^gainst the affairs of Chhattisgarh N^tra Chikitsa Samiti, Telibandha, ffaipur. The Additional Collector ha? already conducted enquiry and ^unbmitted his report which has beenj filed by the petitioner along with l!,A.No.6, application for taking documents on record. He further submits <„.-.- — |!;TT-1^' .^y^ -^c Xi-HC—"^ *!T*! fr^*<i<t> 3^ '<-{l<iM<4, ®Tll'l-l'l's,[s|<~)iyy Up CPIL) r^o- S-2--z</ "ff^ 2007 Si^I'q^E' ("i3 iV^ f T"R? •'BT 3>!^T TIlNr TB'iw^fwsn^ e< Raju aitd |hat from poruaal of the said report, itt pfficer has already pointed out the irganization as pointed out in parag| |4owever, no action has been taken ^ocieties or by the State authoritiesl (Collector. On the other hand, Shri ^dvocate General appearing for the ^ ilready been prepared on 15-5-2009 ijinder law shall be taken, in the light Vie Additional Collector. Shri S. Rajeshwar Rao, i^espondent No.5 submits that they [ubmitted by the Additional Collector t4 pax, Raipur, for necessary action. In view of the above submissiorl r^spondents, the petitioner does not pr| [}etition is dismissed. Sdl- DhirendraMisnra Judge ivuuuld by yvidyiil Ihal tlie Eiiquiiy' jrregularities in the affairs of the raph No.6 of the enquiry report. ^ither by the Registrar Firms and on the report of the Additional Kisltiore Bhaduri, learned Additional ^tate submits that the report has necessary action as permissible of|the findings ofthe report given by q;;-!<!<-fjfl-l tiWvV. ^ fS^t Tfe; •^aifg-ciaii^r learhed counsel appearing for the h^ive already forwarded the report the Commissioner of the Income made by learned counsel for the pr^ss this petition. Accordingly, this & Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge