sat 1 cri.bail appln 1395-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1395 OF 2011 Mohd. Munna Mustak Shaikh ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.R.M. Haridas, Advocate appointed for the Applicant. Mr.H.J. Dedhia, APP for the State. CORAM : M.L. TAHALIYANI, J. NOVEMBER 25, 2011 P.C. :- 1 Heard learned Advocate Mr.Haridas for the applicant and learned APP Mr.Dedhia for the State. 2 As directed by this Court, copies of notes of evidence are produced before the Court. It is seen that the applicant has been identified to be one of the robbers by PW no.4. The evidence of majority of witnesses has been recorded. The trial is likely to be concluded very soon. In the circumstances, I do not think that the applicant has made out any case for grant of bail. sat 2 cri.bail appln 1395-2011 3 Application is rejected. 4 The learned trial Judge should take all necessary steps to expedite the trial and conclude the same, as early as possible. (M.L. TAHALIYANI, J)