BN' Kl ltl!ii tlllii'I l!ii' lllll vr : ' .11 I HIGH COt(®'IQiryeHHATIISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLEMR. SA'riSHK. AGNIHOTRI,J. WMT PETITION <S) No. 5135 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Smt, Pumima Mehar, Wife of Shri Jayant MeKar,.^e.25 years, Pafwari^ posted at Patwari Halfca No. 09 (Haret&i & Sipahimuda) in Kamingo Office, Tehsil Safcti, DistrictJanj^er-Champa. VERSUS , (1) State ofCllhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Departmeat of Revenue, Maritralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, ChhattisgaTli.i (2) Collector, District Jasjgeer-ehampa Chhaftisgarh. ; (3) Sub-Divisional OfBcer, (Revenue^ Sakti, DistricfJanjgeer^Champa,ClihattisgaTh. (4) Sstya Narayan Rathore, Patwari, Posted at Patwari Halka'Nb. 5, Tattsil Sakti, Districf Janjgeer-Champa Glihattisgaife. Present: ShriAnupamDubex, Advocat&.forthepetitioner. Shri Siishil Dubey, ffoYemment Advocate for fhe State/resporidents 1 to3. , ORDEK (Passedon9fllApnl, 2007) Ai 1. The petitioner has filed this petiticm challei^ing the.ti^ dated 03.09.2002. By i?irtue;Qfih&intei-im stay granted IgNthe M^dhya Pradesh Administrative Tribynal at Raipur, the petitioner is continuing atthe original'plaee ofposting. 2, Be that as it may, with the passage of time this petition has becpme infhictuous as period oftransferis not applicable fi)rever. Att6isip&iat 6f time, theffi is no question to examine the yalidity Qf the transfiir order. However, the respondeiitE. are at liberty to pass apprQipriate orders keqnng m view the public interest and adminisljr^iy'ej rh.:_'i:;i exigeney, without iiisisting on eompHaaGe ofthe impugned transfer| order."' . .:! : : ^: •::.'::',^ :• '' : : : /':/i: .,. '":;'lu 3. Ia view ofthe costs.' abo're, t|iis'pettti6S^stan3s:!disp6s^[Of i Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i!:if;l,i