hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 14 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6535 OF 2003 Shri. H.C. Maistry ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Ms. J.A. Sarkhot for Petitioner. None for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : APRIL 30, 2010 P. C.: The grievance of the Petitioner is that when the Petitioner’s application for relief in terms of Prayer Clauses (a) and (b) was granted, relief in terms of Prayer Clause (c) which was to order payment of balance provident fund and gratuity dues which had not been paid and which had to be allowed as a consequence of this court setting aside the order to deduct sum of Rs.73,640.65. None present for the respondents. Considering that the Petitioner would be entitled to these terminal benefits and that has not been considered by the court, Review Petition partly succeeds in the following terms : The Respondents are directed within two months from today to pay to the Petitioner the amount of gratuity and the unpaid amount of Provident Fund which is still due and payable and has not been paid at the statutory rate of interest, if any. If there be no statutory rate, then the unpaid amount will carry interest at the rate of 12% p.a., from the date of superannuation till payment. Review Petition disposed of accordingly. (J.H. BHATIA ,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)