IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 13678 of 2005 Between: 1 Smt.Ch.Anitha, W/o.Dr.Shekar Reddy, R/o.2-3-35/K/3/3/A, Golnaka, Amberpet, Hyderabad. 2 Smt.M.Latha, W/o.Late M.Prabhajan Reddy, R/o. 2-3-35/A.4, Shanker Nagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad. 3 Ch.Kavya Reddy, S/o.Shekar Reddy, rep.by her natural Guardian and mohter Ch.Anitha, W/o.Dr.shekar Reddy R/o.2-3-35/K/3/3/A, Golnaka, Amberpet, Hyderabad. 4 Ch.Nageswar Rao, S/o.Ch.Kotaiah, R/o.plot No.266, Sri Srinivasapuram Colony, Vanasthalipuram, R.R.District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The State of A.P., rep. by its special Chief Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Khairathabad, Hyderabad. 3 The District Registrar, Stamps & Registration, Ranga Reddy District, 4 The Sub Registrar, Champapet, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not registering and releasing the petitioners' sale deeds is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.807, Revenue (Regn.-I) Dept., dated 13-10-2004 and consequently direct the respondent No.4 to release the sale deeds of the petitioners after due registration of their plots. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.J.M.NAIDU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. This writ petition is field questioning the action of the 4th respondent- Sub-Registrar, Champapet, Rangareddy District, in not registering and releasing the sale deeds of the petitioners as per G.O.Ms.No.807, Revenue (Registration-I) Department, dated 13-10-2004, as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.807, dated 13-10-2004 and consequently, to direct the 4th respondent to release the sale deeds of the petitioners after due registration of their respective plots. The petitioners contend that they purchased certain residential plots in Sy.Nos.57 and 57 part situated at Karmanghat village, Saroornagar Mandal, Rangareddy District. They paid the requisite registration fee and submitted their sale deeds to the 4th respondent for registration. But, the 4th respondent refused to register the sale deeds on the ground that the State Government had issued G.O.Ms.No.751 dated 12-12-2001, wherein, it was declared that registration of documents of immovable property in the said survey numbers was opposed to public policy. All the Sub-Registrars were directed not to register any sale deeds pertaining to the said survey numbers and to pass refusal orders. Subsequently, Government issued G.O.Ms.No.807, dated 13-10-2004 under sub-section 1 of Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, denotifying the earlier notification issued in G.O.Ms.No.751, dated 12-12-2001, in respect of the lands situated in the said survey numbers. It is the case of the petitioners that in the light of G.O.Ms.No.807, dated 13-10-2004, the objections raised by the 4th respondent on the basis of G.O.Ms.No.751, dated 12-12-2001, does not exist. The petitioners placed reliance on the judgment of this Court in WP.No.11805 of 2005 dated 07-06-2005, wherein, this Court directed the respondents to release the documents presented by the petitioners for registration without raising any objection on the basis of the said G.O.Ms.No.751, dated12-12-2001. However, this Court made it clear that the order passed in WP.No.11805 of 2005 dated 07-06-2005 did not disable the registering authority to withhold the registration of documents, if there were some other objections for the registration of the documents, other than on the basis of G.O.Ms.No.751, dated 12.12.2001 and if there be other objections, the registering authority was directed to communicate such objections to the petitioners. Accordingly, this writ petition is also disposed of in terms of the order passed in WP.No.11805 of 2005, dated 07-06-2005 with the following directions: The fourth respondent shall release the documents presented by the petitioners for registration without raising any objections on the basis of G.O.Ms.No.751, dated 12-12-2001. The registering authority, however, is not disabled from withholding registration if there are some other objections to the registration of the documents other than on the basis of G.O.Ms.No.751, dated 12-12-2001. If there be other objections, the registering authority shall communicate such objections to the petitioners. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. SD/- N.MURALIDHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Special Chief Secretary, State of A.P., Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Khairathabad, Hyderabad. 3 The District Registrar, Stamps & Registration, Ranga Reddy District, 4 The Sub Registrar, Champapet, Ranga Reddy District. 5 2 CCs to Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT) 6 2 CD copies 7 One CC to Mr. J.M. Naidu, Advocate. (OPUC). Ssl High Court DATED:.27/06/2005 ORDER WP.NO.13678 OF 2005 DISPOSED OF NO COSTS. SSL