1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6813 OF 2008 1.Maharashtra Rajya Shasakiya Parvana Dharak Mudrak Vikreta Aarj Va Dast Lekhak Sanghatana Maharashtra State and another. ...Petitioners. vs. 1.The Principal Secretary, Dept. of Revenue & Forests & ors. ...Respondents. --- Mr.R.D.Soni i/b. M/s.Ram & Co., for Petitioners. Mr.V.A.Sonpal, A Panel Counsel, for Respondents. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED: 7th November,2009 P.C.:- 1. The learned A Panel Counsel appearing for State Government states that it is not true that the State Government included certain function which 2 overlapped the functions of the petitioners. He further states that in Nasik District, no stamp vendor licence yet is given to any SETU operator, also neither any SETU operator applied for the same. He further states that the application which can be given by the licence holder if they comply with all the requirements of law, will also be entertained by the Authorities. The statement is accepted. In view of these statements, the petition is permitted to be withdrawn. All the contentions of the petitioners are kept open. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)