/ (“W/(3) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICA‘I‘UR‘E AT BILASPUR (C.G.) I vmT PETITIoN no. 2?8é OF 2603 w” BETWEM Shriniwas Nancie s/o shri Baijnath Nande, aged about~63 years; Retired mwer ’Divisionr'reachar, Primary Education, Tribal Beveloment, kimary School ‘sarudih Village sax-ndih, Black mldula, Jashpur (CG). Permanent resident of Village Karounaa, P.0. Imora, matrict Ranchi (Bihar) . $te dtih, ta Of ahatsgar Thril the Chief 3ecetry. Pximay ducaton ogh ra r Ei Triba eloméut antrala D. K.8Building, aipu ‘éxl an District aiu (). e Dirter, Pabl ucation. Raipr ic Ed u. ehs nd District Raipr (CG). he msione T isr. Tribal Develpmet. Raigah on r, Tehsil and District Raigarh (CG). ietrict Co-ordinator n . ribal Bevelopmw Jashpur (G) . T t. C ock ducaion Oficer, ashpur Nagar, strict Jashpur (CG). 'strict Treasury Oicer, ashpur, mrict ashpur GG). h leco . ‘Ie Coltr. Jaahpur istct ashpr (cs). Dri Ju R88 wNDENTS wan“ TIW UNDER ARTICLEs 226/22 0? Tbm ETI 7 ’ Priar 6f th tite : atculs e Peidmr s staeé in the case te above. Pac t dn ,rtiulars of he Responets 's tated in the cause title above. o "O2. PET! TI WEE l Bve, My, . gr .Tsi d Rpr 0G rh ee Til a u Bl Et f J Di m £f J st J ( cansmiTUTion er INDIA A t u til A s E‘§§GH CGURT OF CHHAWI$G£§RH : B§LA§PUR ‘WRYT ¥3ETiTiON NQ278G GF 21383 PETiTiONER Shriniwas Namde Versus RESPONBENTS Siaie af ChhaitEgarh 8: Others iwm Petitmn undef Ariicie 22€,’22? 0f the Cansimgiion 0f india} Singie Eench : Han‘bie $hr§ Satish K: Agnihmi’i, J. Presen‘ :- Nana ¥or the petitioner. Shfi AV. S¥§dhan §3anei Lawyer for the Staie. ORDER {ORAL} {Passed an ihis 16*“ day of March, 2910) The matter is cai§ed fm' hearmg twéce. On both occasicns, none agpeaa's nor is any regreseniatien made an behaif a? the petitianea The eeta‘iiiener may mi be mieres’ted in ihe matieah 2) in v€ew of the above, the wr§t pe‘imon is dismissed mr went 6f presecutéon. fewexa Sd/~ $ Satish K.Agnihoiri Juge, :w d l \e