IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.R.BANNURMATH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER THURSDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2009 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 RP.No. 1212 of 2009 --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.2245/2009 DATED 12/10/09 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT: ------------------------------------ GOPINATHAN M.P., 53 YEARS, VANJIYIL VAYALIL HOUSE, CHENGAROTH P.O., PERUVANNAMMOOZHI, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.A.F.SEBASTIAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------- 1. HDFC LTD. REP. BY THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, HDFC HOUSE, P.B.NO.1667, RAVIPURAM JUNCTION, M.G.ROAD, KOCHI - 682 015. 2. THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS GOVERNOR, CENTRAL OFFICE, MUMBAI - 400 001. R1 BY SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI, SC. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.R. Bannurmath, C.J. & A.K. Basheer, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P. No. 1212 OF 2009 IN W.A.No. 2245 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of December, 2009 O R D E R S.R.Bannurmath, C.J. This Review Petition is filed seeking fresh consideration of the entire matter, in spite of the judgment of this Court in the Writ Appeal dated 12.10.09. 2. Even after noting the fact the learned Single Judge in fact had sympathetically considered the entire matter of the amount due to be paid to the respondent Bank, this Bench again granted some time to make the first payment to show the bonafides and thereafter to avail the payment of balance in five equal monthly instalments starting from 01.12.09 and on the first of every succeeding months. 3. By way of review, the appellant is again seeking for interference with the order of the learned Single Judge on the ground that the calculations arrived at are totally wrong. When the learned Single Judge and this Bench has R.P. No. 1212 OF 2009 IN W.A.No. 2245 OF 2009 -:2:- re-considered the entire matter afresh and found that there was no error on the part of the action taken by the respondent, however, taking sympathetic view, certain concessions were granted by us. We do not think that the grounds raised in the Review Petition, filed within the scope of Order 47 Rule 1 CPC, need to be reviewed. Hence the Review Petition is dismissed. S.R. Bannurmath, Chief Justice. A.K. Basheer, Judge. ttb