^ ^ Single Bench iN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G) W.P. (Sl N0. M %l0 OF 2011 PETmONER ^w .-^^ <>'' ''..•••""^)" ^vliA..-1"' y ••' ^\ ^ y ^y/ ^^./' 'y RESPQNDENTS f^/^\, ,^ ^Ni ^ s'(t'T/'niw! ^' f II . f^:TT?i??,n.,J ^ <^^ ^^ ^ Ku.Tijan Badhai, aged about 26 years, D/o Subhan Singh Badhai, Shiksha Karmi varg-H, Govemment Middle Schoo! Otekasa, Block Durgkondal, District North Baster Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Panchayat & Social Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. ^ The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat North Baster Kanker (C.G.) WRST PETITSON UNDER ART!CLE 226 OF THE CONSTjTUjQNOFJNDIA oAo ^ HIGH COURT OP CHHATriSGARH ATBILASPUR QS :HQy3L1SQHmjySTlC]SPmTmKEiRQSWA^ W.P.fSl N0. 4810/2011 PBTITIOItBR .. • : . Ku. Tijan Badhai Versus RBSPONDBNTS State ofC.G.as Others • WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 0V THB CONSTITUTION Or INDIA Aopearaaces Shri D.N.Prajapati, couinsel tbr the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, P.L. for fhe State. ORM-ORDER (23.08.20tl) ' Grievauce of fhe petitioner iu, the present. petition is.that. on 10.8.06 she was appoirited as Shiksha Karmi Grade-II aad she contmued on the said post till 23.5.08 but fhereafter she was reiaoved froni her po^t on fhe ground fliat she lias not aiinexed proper experience certi&cate. Pursuaiit to fhe order passed by this Court dated 7,5,09^ the petitioner preferred a statatory appeal before fhe Additional Commissioner chaUengmg the validity of her termiiia.tion order and the said appeat was allowed by tlie com.peteiit aufhority on 5,08.2010. This order was assailed by tlie State Goverament before the Secretary, Panchayat however, fhe order of the Additional Commissioner was also maiotam.ed ia appeal vide oider dated 28.4.2011. Accordiag to the coiinsel for fhepet3.tioD.er thougli the. order has been passed in his lavour but tiU date she has not beea allowed to join. 011 the post ofShiksha Karoii Grade-II. Counsel for the petitioner siibmits fhat the limited prayer of fhe petitioner is fhat her pendm.g representations (Annexure P/5) be decided in accordaiice with law» y^:^ 'y'ii. "^ ^ ^- y ..^^ ^;l:}/;'^.^;-y' -^Y State couusel has no objection ifthe pe.nd.ing representations of tlie petitioner is decided in accordaiice witl:i law within soiae tmieframe. The present petition is disposed of with a direction to fhe respondent No.2 to decide . tlie pendiag represeutations of the .petitioner and to pa.ss appropriate order-as expeditiously as possible. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge