16. 09.11.2017 W.P.(C) No.4582 of 2007 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has argued the case by arguing that there are three charges inflicted upon the petitioner. Charge No.2 has not found to be proved in a ccordance to the ROE. However, Charge Nos.1 and 2 have found to be proved. He submits that Charge No.3 relates to possession of Rs.11,350/- which is contravention to the instruction and SOP. He argues that what is the instruction and SOP that has not brought on record. Mr. D. Lenka, learned Central Government Counsel, representing the BSF , has submitted that he is to seek instruction in this regard and what is the basis of inflict ing Charge No.3 upon the petitioner, for which he prays four weeks time. Accordingly and as prayed for by learned Central Government Counsel ap pearing for the BSF, list this case immediately after four weeks. .. S.N.Prasad,J. DA 2