WP(C) 6417/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE H BARUAH Heard Mr P K Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr S Das, learned Government Advocate, Assam, appearing on behalf of respo ndent Nos. 1 to 6. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ p etition is taken up for disposal at the motion stage. The petitioner, herein, is the son of one Late Basanta Kumar Nat h, who died on 24.06.2004 while in service under the administrative control of r espondent No. 6, herein, leaving behind his wife, two sons and a daughter. The p etitioner’s father while alive was working as a Supply Checker and on his death, his entire family has been facing extreme financial hardship. The petitioner, t herefore, made an application for his appointment on compassionate ground in any of the posts of Grade- III/ Grade - IV, in the office of the respondent No. 6. On filing of the application, it was forwarded to respondent No. 1 for appointme nt of the petitioner on compassionate ground by the respondent authorities in an y of the posts either in Grade-III or Grade - IV. The respondent authorities hav ing not taken any action on the application of the petitioner for his appointmen t on compassionate ground, the petitioner being aggrieved filed this writ petiti on to issue direction to the respondent authorities to appoint him in any of the posts either in Grade-III or Grade - IV in the office of the respondent No. 6. Mr Talukdar, learned counsel while supporting this writ petition submits by relying the decision in the case between Faziron Nessa & Others -Vs- State of Assam & Others, reported in 2010 (4) GLT 340, that the guidelines form ulated by this Court in respect of compassionate appointment would also be appli cable and this writ petition may also be disposed of in terms of the decision re ndered in the case of Faziron Nessa (supra). Mr Das, learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the State respondents, however, in view of the decision rendered in Faziron Nessa (s upra), reported in 2010 (4) GLT 340, has not resisted this writ petition and agr ees to its disposal in terms of the guidelines formulated in Faziron Nessa’s cas e (supra). In the face of the facts appearing in the case record and other attending circumstances, this Court finds no impediment to dispose of this writ petition in terms of the decision rendered in the case of Faziron Nessa (supra). This petition accordingly stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider the case of the petitioner on the basis of the guidelin es formulated in the case of Faziron Nessa (supra). This writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. No cost.