IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2010 / 14TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 6312 of 2010(Q) ---------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- G.P.AJITHKUMAR, S/O.P.PURUSHOTHAMAN NAIR 'SARGAM',V.P.507,KODUNGANOOR.P.O, THIRUVAANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SMT.M.HEMALATHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SREEKARYIYAM POLICE STATION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.U.NAZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ................................. W.P.(c).No.6312 of 2010 .................................... Dated: 04.06.2010 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is the inaction on the part of the Police right from the Sub Inspector of Police, Sreekaryam up to the Commissioner of Police, Thiruvananthapuram with regard to Sale Deed dated 27.4.2004 registered as Document No.1640/2004 of S.R.O., Pothencode, which according to the petitioner was got executed by impersonation without his consent or knowledge. According to the petitioner he has not executed any such document and his petitions before the various police officers have not received any attention. In the light of the decision in S akiri Vasu v. State of U.P. (2008(1) KLT 724 SC) and Kunga Nima Lepcha and others v. State of Sikkim and others 2010(4)SCC 513, the remedy of the petitioner is either to file a private complaint before the Magistrate concerned or move the Magistrate under Section 156(3)Cr.P.C.,for monitoring the investigation. Without prejudice to the above remedy of the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed. Dated this the 4th day of June, 2010. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj