IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No. 3168 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision 12.05.2011 Krishan Lal Petitioner versus Gopal Sharma Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.N.S.Shekhawat,Advocate, for the petitioner. *** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that he does not want to press the revision petition on merits but sought time to vacate the demised premises. In view thereof, this petition is dismissed as not pressed but the petitioner is granted five months' time to vacate the demised premises on or before 12.10.2011 subject to the condition that he would furnish an undertaking before the Rent Controller within 30 days of receipt of certified copy of this order and shall hand over vacant possession of the demised premises to the landlord on or before 12.10.2011 and shall keep on paying the rent. It is further made clear that in case of violation of the undertaking given to the Rent Controller, he would be liable under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 12.05.2011 JUDGE Anoop