IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.409 of 2011 1. Nitesh Kumar 2. Babloo @ Vivek Kumar 3. Ram Suresh Singh ---Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar & Ors. --- Respondents ----------- 2. 20.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The grievance of the petitioners is that in Trial No.1843 of 2010 arising out of Dehri Police Station Case No.411/10 (G.R. No.2121/03) important witness i.e., the concerned doctor is not being examined by the prosecution. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the prosecution has to consider as to who has to be examined on behalf of the prosecution to support the case. Considering the submissions of the parties, the grievance of the petitioners that the doctor is not being examined in this case, since the prosecution has not closed its evidence, appears to be premature. However, the petitioners will have an opportunity to make an application for examination of any witness in support of the defence when they will be entering in defence after close of the prosecution case. The writ application stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)