~y: C^F 7^<^- OTHER MATTER SINGLE BENCH IN THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITION f0) N0.4£^OF 2006 PETITIONER Layos Son of Shri Siril, aged about ..,.-<< 50 years, Caste Uraon, Sarpanch, xs^. ^ty>-' ^>y;^""...-'••"' ..•"'" c:^%\°^ ^^^y eu'<.^>>.1"" ^ Gram Panchayat Harradand, Tahsil Kunkuri, DistrictJashpur (C.G.). ^^•>^'-^->' '^••""" RES mENTS VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Secretariat Raipur (C.G.). ^2. The Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue), Kunkuri, District Jashpur (C.G.). i^^Js^' ^?^:^'T^ >a; 1 ^iS&^ ^ ^ <6>o^ s>^- ^" QVs^^^ 3. The Collector; Jashpur, District Jashpurnagar, (C.G.). 4. Vishwanath Ram Sidar; SonofShri Vitram; ^ 5. Alvis Tirkey; Son of Shri Etwa Tirkey; /6. Vijay Shankar; Son of Shri Baldev Ram; 7. Fuljans; Son ofShri Mangru; '¥ ^ R.espondent No.4 to 7 &re residents of v Gram HarradaHd; Tahsil Kuhkuri, District Jashpur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICl.^ V 226/22Z 0^_ THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, ETC. AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER QR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIO_NS. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT KLASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRTT PETmON (0 No. 4548 of2006 Layos VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others ^ r ^ WRIT PETTHON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTmjTION_QFJNDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aemhotri. J. , Present: Shri N.L. Soni,, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer fbr the State. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 2681 day of August, 201-0) At the very outset, leamed counsel appearing for the State submits that the election for the post of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat-Harradand, Block-Kunkuri, District-Jashpur has ah-eady been held in the month ofJanuary, 2010 andthe election certificate has already been issued on 03/02/2010. 'Thus, nothmg survives in this petition for adjudication at this stage and this petition has become infhictuous. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner does not controvert the above submission and farther submits that nothing survives in fhis petition for adjudication. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infhictuous. Consequently, intenm relief grauted earlier, ifany, is vacated. i Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri