1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 1988 of 2008 [Mrs. S. M. Sarda Vs. M.J. Sarda] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. Pradeep Marpakwar, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Jaiswal, Adv., for respondent sole. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 06th May,2008. 1. Heard both sides. 2. Petitioner is challenging the order passed by the Family Court, by which the Family Court had granted application of the respondent u/o 16 Rule 14 of CPC for summoning the witnesses. 3. Admittedly, the nature of evidence sought for is exploratory. The same cannot be said to be the witnesses of the respondents. The exercise of jurisdiction under Order-XVI, Rule 14 of Civil Procedure Code, therefore, cannot be held to be erroneous. 2 4. In the circumstances, no interference is called for. Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. Judge |Hedau|