1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3426 OF 2009 Mannan Khan Sultan Khan and others ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... None for the petitioners Mr. J.S. Gavane, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 ..... CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 20TH AUGUST, 2009 PER COURT:- 1 This Court by order dated 11.6.2009 has issued notice to the respondents returnable within four weeks. Thereafter matter was listed for admission on 10.7.1009. Learned AGP waived notices for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and the matter was posted for admission to 20.7.2009. On 20.7.2009 again matter was adjourned at the request of learned AGP for filing reply to 3.8.2009. On 3.8.2009, again learned AGP prayed for time and this Court, by way of last chance, granted time for filing reply. It was clarified in the said order that no further time would be granted and the matter will be disposed on the adjourned date, as the pleading raised in the petition has not been 2 controverted. 2 Today, learned AGP is not even aware about the stage of this matter as well as the earlier order passed by this Court. This is sorry state of affairs and it is happening in number of matters. 3. Since no reply is filed by respondent Nos. 1 and 2, State authorities, inspite of the order passed by this Court on 3.8.2009, on merits, learned AGP has nothing to say and is unable to argue the matter, therefore, this petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause “B” and disposed of. (S.S. SHINDE, J). rlj/