1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 492 of 2009 Milind v. Pravin and anr -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr M. S. Vakil, Adv for respondents Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 7th August 2009 1. None appears for applicant. Heard learned counsel for the respondents. Applicant is seeking condonation of delay of about 542 days caused in preferring an application for grant of leave to file appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 8.5.2007. 2. Delay is sought to be condoned on the ground of ill health and serious financial problem. However, not a single medical documentary evidence is furnished along with the application. I have also perused grounds raised in the accompanying application and the main appeal together with judgment of the trial Court. Complaint was dismissed on the ground that it was not filed within the limitation prescribed and there would hardly be anything to interfere in the judgment of acquittal. 3. Considering the fact that there is no medical certificate furnished by applicant to substantiate his averment particularly when the extent of delay is more than 500 days, I am not inclined to condone the delay. Application for condonation of delay is thus rejected. Consequently, 2 application seeking leave to appeal is also rejected. Judge. hsj