IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17253 of 2009 RAJEEV KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 14.10.2009 Heard. I have admitted to bail one of the co- accused Satish Kumar by order passed in Cr. Misc. No. 17472 of 2009 and the facts have been narrated by me in order passed in Cr. Misc. No. 49579 of 2008. Only from a look of the facts, any cultured person would be very slow to direct to release such an accused on bail but because one of the accused has been admitted to bail for the reasons as indicated in my order passed in Cr. Misc. No. 17472 of 2009, I direct to release of this petitioner, namely, Rajeev Kumar from custody on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 197 of 2008 with the following conditions:- (i) That his brother Vijay Kumar, who is present in Court and to whom the implication of the present order has been explained, shall be one of the sureties of the petitioner. (ii) That the above named Vijay Kumar shall given a written undertaking in court below that he will not give the Courts any moment of anxiety on re-hearing of the prayer for bail of the petitioner and further that he shall ensure that the petitioner maintains good conduct and behavior in society. (iii) It is made very clear that in case the petitioner is found and reported indulging into same or similar nature of offence or any act of vandalism / gundaism, the court shall issue notice to the petitioner and on being satisfied about the veracity of the report, shall assume that this Court had not passed the present order and shall take steps for committing the petitioner to custody. If the court has to proceed as indicated in condition no. (iii) then it has to be done within one and half months of the receipt of any report or information in any form by the court below. Spd/- (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)