IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13719 of 2009 Date of Decision: December 13, 2010 Gurmeet Kaur .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. R.K. Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sonia Dhillon, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release retiral benefit due towards the petitioner, on the basis of average emoluments, without any reduction and recovery. 2. Learned counsel for the parties agree that the matter can be referred to the CWP No.13719 of 2009 [2] Committee constituted under Orders of this Court while dealing with Civil Writ Petition No.16323 of 2008 titled `Smt. Sudarshana Devi & another vs. State of Punjab & others’, decided on 2.3.2010. 3. In view of the common prayer made by learned counsel for the parties, the petition is disposed of in terms of judgment dated 2.3.2010 rendered by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.16323 of 2008 titled `Smt. Sudarshana Devi & another vs. State of Punjab & others’. (AJAI LAMBA) December 13, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?