1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION No. 2402/2010. Vijay Sahebrao Telmore . -: versus :- Tajrao Haribhau Kalmegh Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JUNE 07, 2010. Heard Shri S.A. Mohta, learned counsel for petitioner. He contends that, if Mukund Lande was really elected as Secretary, the respondent who filed change report could have described him as Secretary in the change report itself. He states that after a year amendment was sought and in that amendment no effort to correct the alleged error about the designation of Mukund Lande was made. After two years, under the pretext that there was such error, designation of Shri Mukund Lande was sought to be corrected as Secretary from that of Member. Learned counsel for petitioner argues that all this clearly shows after thought and such amendment could not have been allowed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner. 2 It is apparent that the merits of the amendment are not relevant at this stage. Whether the reason given for carrying out amendment are correct or not, and whether effort is bonafide or malafide, can be demonstrated before the Assistant Charity Commissioner by the present petitioner at appropriate stage. On this ground no interference is warranted in writ jurisdiction. The nature of change report proceedings also do not undergo any change because of such amendment. Hence in the circumstances, no case is made out warranting any interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.