IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29399 of 2011(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. RANJITH PANIKAR,S/O.T.K.CHANDRASEKHARAN, AGED 24 YEARS, KALARICKAL HOUSE, KANAKAMALA P.O., KODAKARA, THRISSUR-680 689. 2. DAIN DAVIS, S/O. DAVIS ANTONY A., AGED 23 YEARS, KOLLANNUR HOUSE, GREEN PARK AVENUE, P.O.CHEVOOR, THRISSUR-680 027. 3. ANOONS PAUL, S/O. T.D.PAUL, AGED 22 YRS, THARAYIL HOUSE, RICE BAZAR, NEAR VIMALA BUILDING, THRISSUR-680 001. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY THE REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY CAMPS, THENJIPALAM, CALICUT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY CAMPS, THENJIPALAM, CALICUT. SC SRI.T.A.SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).29399/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1 : A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION DTD.27.9.2011. EXT.P2 : A TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DTD.29.9.2011. EXT.P3 : A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION DTD.23.9.2011. EXT.P4 : A TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DTD.29.9.2011. EXT.P5 : A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION DTD.23.9.11. EXT.P6 : A TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DTD.23.9.11. (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).29399/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 4th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of certain subjects in the 6th semester B.Tech (Applied Electronics & Instrumentation) Examination vide Exts.P1, P3 & P5 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs