:Lungw @H IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. No. £ZZé of 2004 PETITIONER xxKomal Chand Koshale, S/o. Late Phoolchand Koshale, aged about 37 years, ’R/oBhatapara Halka Patvvari No. 14 A — Present Posting Place Balouda Bazar, District —~ Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Collector Raipur, t District Raipur Sub Divisional Officer, t Balouda Bazar, District — Raipur Tahseeldar, Balouda Bazar District — Raipur Tejpal Dubey, S/o. Not Known, Patwari Halka No.9 Arjuni, Tahsil — Balouda Bazar, District — Raipur (C.G.) The Petitioner most respectfully states as under: — 1) Particulars of the Petitioner:- Particulars of the petitioner are same as above in the cause title. - WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 8a 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA m $Wané€r ‘ oz mm ‘ -.‘ Mrs. Hamida Siddique, learr edicounse’l for the petitioner. Mr. Akhil Agrawal, learn ad Pane! Lawyer for ’ the State of Chhattisgarh, - Mr. Raja Shérma, leérned cc unsel for respondent No. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that byorder dated 31.07.2004 (Anneuxre P-2) the. betitioner was transferred from Tehsii Bhatapara to Patwari Halka No.1 3, Tehsil Rajim. Thereafter; by order dated 13.08.2004 (Annexure P-‘ the petitioner was transferred again from old place of posting Pat/val Halka' No 22 Bhampara'to Patwan l Halka No 7 Bhatapara Again by rder dated 17 08 2004 (Annexure P-8) transfer order was amended and t e petitioner was transferred to Patwan Halka No14-A Baloda Bazar. Thereafter the transfer order dated 17.08.2004 (Annexure P-8) was n amended on 20 10 2004 (Annexure P-1) whereby the petitioner was firstly transferred from Patwarl Halka No 22 Bhatapara to Patwan Halk No 14-A Baloda Bazar After fndmg that one Shn TeJpal Dubey / res ondent No.5 was already-working at Patwari Halka No.14-A,. Baloda B ar, the petitioner was transferred to Patwari Halka 32,!Revenue Circ Tehsil Baloda Bazar. lt is further submitted by the learned counsel or the petitioner that the petitioner had alreadyjoined Patwari Halka No.14 A Baloda Bazar. Admittedly there are sev ral transfer orders passed by the administratiorff' lt appears that the respondents 1 to 4 have passed these transfer orders without applying heir mind. There should be some certainty of posting and place of w rking. Though it is true, the transfer is an incidence of service and th employer has right to transfer an ‘5‘ " «in mm#% 3 a i l , Xl-HC—78 mwqim , ...92.H.%%.{ W200 9 m‘awm - wmam WW#WVW ' ‘ $W max amt W»(g§i§aa) . mmmanéa f a _ t it appears in the present case, the employee in the pLibIic interest b Government has passed sever! orders without looking into either administrative exigency or inconv nience caused to the petitioner. Sinee it is a transfer order, i am not inclin d to interfere with the present petition. However, the respondents e directed todecide the representation of the petitioner sympathetically k eping in View the certainty of service and Convenience of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation if any, made by the petitioner. ln view of the foregoing, the etition is disposed of. /‘\L\ Consequently, all pending a plications also stand disposed of. 6/ a . _.'bafma '