1 32-rpast.25501.11 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (stamp) NO. 25501 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 273 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. D.M.Mehta a/w Mr.Sameer Singh and Mr.Kalpak Sanchala i/b Mr.Pravin Mehta and Mithi and Company for the Review Petitioner. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 21 st November, 2011. P.C. . The learned counsel appearing for the Review Petitioner submitted that the statement of the learned counsel for the Municipal Corporation recorded in paragraph Nos.3 and 4 of the order of this Court dated 20 th April, 2011 is factually incorrect and in fact, there is no hawker on the site. 2 When the said statement was made before this Court, the correctness thereof was not disputed by the Review Petitioner. If the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the Municipal 2 32-rpast.25501.11 Corporation is false, it is for the Review Petitioner to proceed against the Municipal Corporation in that behalf. 3 No case is made out for reviewing the earlier order. Subject to what is observed above, the review petition is rejected. [ A.S.OKA, J ]