THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.10520 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard Sri Sampath Kumar, Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri R. Radhakrishna Reddy, Learned Standing Counsel for the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation. At their request the Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission. The petitioner claims to have purchased house bearing No.41-25/1, 41-26/A and 41-26 situated at Old Moulai Main Road, Moulali, Hyderabad for valuable consideration from the respective owners, and to be in possession of the properties eversince. Her case is that, on 27.04.2010, the respondent officials came over to her house and started marking the property for the purpose of laying a road around the Arch of the Moulali Kaman without issuing any notice to her, and without giving her an opportunity of being heard. Petitioner would assert that she had objected to the marking and that she had informed the respondents that she had purchased the property through registered sale deed despite which the authorities had high handedly made markings and were seeking to forcibly obtained her consent for the purpose of demolishing her property. Sri R. Radhakrishna Reddy, Learned Standing Counsel for the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, on instructions, would submit that, while the respondents had marked the property, the petitioner has neither been dispossessed from the house in question nor have the respondents initiated steps for its demolition. Learned Standing Counsel would submit that only after adhering to the provisions of Sections 146 and 147 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act would the petitioner be dispossessed from the property, and the property in question demolished for the purposes of road widening. Recording the submission of the Learned Standing Counsel, the respondents are directed not to interfere with the petitioner’s property or demolish it except after adhering to the provisions of Sections 146 and 147 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Date: 30.04.2010 ___________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J MRKR