IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. R.S.A. No. 195 of 1989 Date of Order: 29.8.2011 Surinder Singh Chopra ....... Appellant. Versus Lachhman Dass Bhatia and others. ...... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK .... Present: Shri Mahipal Singh, Advocate for Shri Ashish Kapoor, Advocate. None for the appellant. None for the respondents. .... VIJENDER SINGH MALIK,J. This regular second appeal has been preferred against judgments and decrees dated 30.11.1987 and 19.8.1988 passed respectively by learned Sub Judge Ist Class, Kurukshetra and learned Additional District Judge, Kurukshetra whereby the suit filed by Surinder Singh Chopra - appellant for mandatory injunction with consequential relief of permanent injunction was dismissed and his appeal was also dismissed. When the appeal came up for hearing on 1.8.2011, it was informed that Shri S.C.Kapoor, Advocate (designated Senior Advocate) through whom the present appeal was filed, has since expired. Therefore, notice to the appellant was directed to be R.S.A. No. 195 of 1989 .... -2- issued. The office has reported that the notice sent to the appellant has been received back with the report that he has died. Shri Mahipal Singh, Advocate for Shri Ashish Kapoor, Advocate (son of Shri S.C.Kapoor, Senior Advocate) has stated that efforts made on their part to contact the legal representatives of the appellant have gone un-responded. In the face of the statement of Shri Mahipal Singh, Advocate, there is no scope for informing the legal representatives of the deceased appellant. Therefore, the appeal stands abated. August 29,2011 ( VIJENDER SINGH MALIK) “SCM” JUDGE