IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH TA No.35 of 2009 Decided on :22 -04-2009 Smt. Archana ....Applicant VERSUS Sunil Kumar ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr. D.D.Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Aman Sibia, Advocate for the respondent MAHESH GROVER, J Learned counsel for the applicant states that instead of pressing the present application he would be satisfied if the applicant is permitted to participate in the proceedings in divorce petition pending inter se between the parties at Ludhiana provided she is given some protection as she apprehends threat to her life as she was prevented from making statement in the Court. Respondent is present in Court. He has assured the Court that he will not obstruct the applicant from participating in the proceedings in any manner and will not pose any hindrance to her or anyone else involved in the proceedings. Separate undertaking to this effect has also been recorded which is placed on record. In this view of the matter, I am of the considered opinion that as no further orders need be passed in the present application and impact of the order dated 20.4.2009 shall stand erased and the present application is disposed of as such. April 22 , 2009 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge