IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO:11674 of 2006 Between: Ch.Gowramma W/o.Gattaiah in the office of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Narsampet, Warangal District ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The District & Sessions Judge, Warangal 2. The Govt.of A.P., Rep.by its Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 3. The Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, Govt.of A.P., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction especially one in the nature of writ of mandamus: i. declare the impugned proceedings No.Dis.No.7436 dated 22.12.2004 and Proc.No.DC- WGL/AW-E/Dis.No.7475 dated 23.12.2004 as illegal, and arbitrary, and set aside the same ii. consequently direct the respondent to release the petitioner salary on regular basis duly treating petitioner as regular employee with effect from 23.12.2004 and continue to pay regular wages duly granting all other consequential benefits and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.VASUDEVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: (SC FOR APHC),P.V.SANJAY KUMAR The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No.11674 of 2006 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao, J) This writ petition is filed by Smt.Ch.Gowramma, working as full ti me Masalchi in the Office of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Narsampet, Warangal District, against a show cause notice calling upon to show cause as to why she should not be reverted. It appears, during the pendency of the Writ Petition, a final order has been passed, against which, an appeal is also filed. In view of the above, it is not proper for us to go into the merits of the case. Learned Counsel for the petitioner also seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to seek redressal before appropriate forum in an appropriate manner. Giving liberty to do so, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) _________________ (G.CHANDRAIAH, J) 30.07.2008 vs To 1. The District & Sessions Judge, Warangal 2. 2CCs to 3. 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}