1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 220 OF 1999 Ravishankar Ganpat Jagtap ....Petitioner V/s Smt. Poonam Nandkishore Bidkar and anr. ....Respondents ---- Mr. D.S. Joshi i/b Mr. A.A. Agarwal for the Petitioner. None for Respondents. ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 2nd August, 2007 P.C.: 1. This matter was kept part heard since part of the amount was not paid by the petitioner pursuant to the undertaking given by him to this Court. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the entire amount has now been paid. On the last date, time was given to the Petitioner in order to enable the parties to withdraw the proceedings as agreed by the respondents in the consent terms which were filed in this Court. I am informed that the petitioner has not contacted the Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. 2. In my view, it is not necessary to adjourn the matter any further. In view of the consent terms which are filed by the parties and which have been taken on record, the impugned order is set 2 aside. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). In view of the consent terms which are taken on record, it is open for the Petitioner to take further steps for withdrawal of the suit by the respondents. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)