IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY THE EIGHTEEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No. 2 0 1 3 1 OF 2009 Between: Soma Narsaiah s/o Soma Chinnaiah Aged about 60 years, 0cc. Agriculture, R/o Jangampet village, Velpur Mandal, Nizamabad district & Anr. …. Appellants V/s. The Government of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its Secretary, Mines & Geology Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & 5-Ors. …. Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Sri C. HARI PREETH Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Mines & Geology for R1 to R4 GP for Revenue for R5 THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No. 2 0 1 3 1 OF 2009 J U D G M E N T : (Per the Hon'ble Smt.Justice T.Meenakumari, The Acting Chief Justice) The writ petition is filed seeking mandamus to declare the Proceedings in Memo bearing No. 11215/SPIU & S and 2008-1, dated 11-9-2008 and order dated 02-12-2008 in Proceedings No. 1615/KG/2007, issued by the Respondent No.4 as illegal, arbitrary and to pass such other and further suitable orders as this court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 2. On 15-12-2009 this Court passed the following order in the main writ petition: Rule Nisi. Call for records. Notice returnable in four weeks. 3. On the same day, this Court passed the following order in WPMP.No. 26258 of 2009: Ad-interim relief dated 18-09-2009 shall continue pending the writ petition. 4. WVMP.No. 3253 of 2009 ordered to be listed along with the main writ petition. 5. Sri C. Hari Preeth, counsel the learned counsel for the writ petitioners filed a letter dated 17-2-2010 before the Registry stating that as per the instructions of the writ petitioners, he is seeking to post WP.No.20131 of 2009 along with WPMP.No. 26258 of 2009 under the caption for “Withdrawal”. 6. Today when the matter is listed under the caption “for withdrawal”, Sri C. Hari Preeth, counsel seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with a leave to avail such remedies as may be available to the petitioners in law. 7. Leave is accordingly granted. 8. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. It is needless to observe that if the petitioners avail any such remedy, the same shall be considered on its own merits uninfluenced by the dismissal of this writ petition. ____________________________ JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ________________________________ JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH 18-02-2010. I s L THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No. 20131 OF 2009 Judgment of the Division Bench delivered by the Hon'ble Smt. Justice T. Meenakumari, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Circulation Entry No. Date: 18-02-2010 COMPUTER No. 43 Court Master: I s L