3^'^rm^T, ^Tn'H4i<s, [cj^i'y^ 'WT^IT shNI* Wi, 200 3?st?r'q^ra? (^?^<yar) ^H^T ?F[ 1^?lNa '^§ii'sn^i ^qNT ^ i^TW^^^I^l HIGH COURT Ot* CHHATTIBGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. HON'BLS DHSRENDRA MISHRA^J WmTPETl!T!ONf22Ti_NO._1438^2008 Petitio^ers Defendaiits 4. 1. Plaiatiffs <^i^t<n<ili ^TH^if ^'fe^ ifa^K '^^ffiiH^n^r Satyaiiarayaii Dubey Son of Sharda i Prasad Dubey, aged about 56 years, J Occupatiou Agricultiirist; j Laxmi Narayaii Dubey, Son of Sharda i Prasad Dubey, aged about 48 years,| Occupatioii Ser^k'e iii Graiiiin Baiik; | i The petitio-iier No. 1 and 2 are resident of Viliage Ramauujnagar, Preseutly | resident at VUlage aiid Post Bargideeli, | Tahsil Ambikapur, Distnct Surguja i (C.G.) | Koushlendra Kumar Dubey Son of Late | Haniarayaa Dubey, aged about 35 years; j i Rajendra Kuiaar Dubey, Sou of Late | J Haniarayan Uubey, aged about 32 years, J i OccupatioiiAgriculturist; ] 1 . . . 1 The peutiouer No. 3 and 4 are resident of | i Village aad Post Ramaiiujnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.) j I Shri Krislma Dubey Son of Late Sharda ! I Prasad Dubey, aged about 51 years, | j Occupation Agricultare and Business, j j Resident of Village Shrtnagar, Post ! ^.sS^s.s^^,&^..S. T^T ^l'qicy-)^, ^xnyll<$, [s|^>iy^< ^n^T^Tl^iN? ^^ ^^iw^^ ^Wvil ?bN8db ^ 200 3?I^T X|?W (yi?ysq6T) '^nw^rfi^ ^IT^T 2— 2. !3, No.3 4.3.2008 Mr. A.K. Shukla, Mr, Bhaskar Pyas By this petition ut the petitioner has imp^ passed by Civil Jiiclge, where.by opportuniUr pe.titioiie.rs/ defenclaats the. Code of Civil Proced1 Learaed coiuisel fs of defendaiits' witnesse? however, the prayer foi frouud that uo med defendants. '^FSfeR^ ^TR^f ^fe^t ifa^K ^^iRpi^n^i j Raiaaaujnagar, Tahsil-Surajpur, District i j Szirguja (C.G.) j Maiinulal Son of Shri Krismia Dubey, J a^ed about 19 years, Student, Resideut j of VUlage aad Post Ramanujnagar, j Talisil Surajpur, District Sarguja (C,G,) j State of Ma-dhya Pradesh (Now j Chliattlsgarii, thixjugh the Collector, SiirgiiJH Azirihikapiir (C.G.) "oiinsel for the petitioners. , Paiiel La^/yer for State/respondeut No, 3, tder Article 227 ofthe Coiistitutioii of India p^igiied the order dated 7th Februaiy 2008 plass-I, Szu'ajpur in Civil Suit No.255A/04 of adducing evideiice of the 3ias been closed uncler Order 17 Riile 2 of lire. • \>r the petitioners subniits fhat the abseiice 1 was bona&de as tliey were reported sick, ^ acljoiiniHient was rejecte.d only 011 fhe lcal certi&cate has becn filed bv the 3^-^|A||0q^ ^vHy<|(o, fsf^l^y (g) ^IWdll (ib^ilch ^ 200 ^i^r^rK^ ^^1 'SH^T ^^iic^ h 3?ityr '^ro (^Il^<^) ^^ITW^ft^ ^¥T ^> I have penised th^ aiid from perusal tliere^ fixed for recorduig of de^ Uie defendan.ts we.rc Riv^n aiid cousideiio.g fhe abc^ the petitioiiers/cle.feiida|its leained Civil Jiidgc. Takiag iato cond leamed Civil Judg petitioners/ de.fe.udan.ts, jurisdictioual error occasion failure of interference uncler Artic] In the result, the same deserves t6 be dis1 accordiagly, dismissed. In view of above, I| ct»S<lf<y1<<1l^H^ff^fest <P?i<^S< ^^ffOT3?l^T mipugned order dated 7th FebiTiapv 2008 )f, it is evident that the matter ha.s beeii mdaiits' evidence smce 2003. Earlier also last opportiinity for adduciag evidence ve aspect of the matter, the opportuuity of to lead evidence was closed by tlie tideration the reasons assigned by the for rejectin.g prayer of tlie I am. of the opiiiion tliat tiiere is no coi|iBiitted by tlie Court below which may justice or grave iajustice, warraiitmg 1e. 227 ofthe Constitution oflndia. |iistaiit petitiou is devoid of siibstaiice, tlie ^iissed at tiie admission stage itsetf and is A.No.Ol staiids disposed of Sd/- Dhu-endraMishra Judge