1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMOMS NO. 74 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 5 OF 2002 IN PETITION NO. 949 OF 2001 Mrs.Savita Satish Jayakar ...Petitioner vs. Mr.Vijay Manohar Vyavahyarkar Vrindava Co-op.Hsg.Soc.Ltd. & Anr. ...Defendants/ Respondents and Mr.Satish K. Jayakar & Ors. ...Applicants Mr.Nitin G. Raut and G.P. Vas for the Applicants. Mr.N.V. Bhutekar for the Defendants. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 29, 2009 P.C. :- 1 Heard Counsel for the Applicants. 2 The Chamber Summons is allowed. There is no delay in bringing the heirs of petitioner on record. Consequential amendments in the petition 2 are, accordingly, allowed in terms of Schedule annexed to the Chamber Summons. Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within four weeks. Chamber Summons is disposed of. The petition, therefore, will have to be converted into a petition for Letters of Administration with the Will annexed. (V.M. KANADE, J.)