* 1 * FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 920 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 168 OF 1997 [ Sarjerao Maruti Sathe V/S. Arjun Maruti Sathe & Ors.] Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s order or Court’s or Judge’s orders directions and Registrar orders Mr.S.S.Patwardhan,adv.for appellant. Mr.U.B.Nighot,adv.for respondent no.1. Mr.R.D.Soni i/by. M/s.Ram & Co.adv.for respondents CORAM: SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED: 15TH JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1. Leave to amend granted. 2. Heard counsel for both sides. 3. Mr.Patwardhan states that the Civil Application is pressed in terms of prayer clause (b) and b(i) alone. By these two prayers, the applicants seek to bring the heirs of deceased respondent no.6 on record. The applicant and all the other respondents * 2 * are the heirs and legal representatives of respondent no.6. Therefore, they are merely required to be described in the cause title of the plaint in their additional capacity as heirs of respondent no.6. The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b) and b(i). Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today. The appeal to be listed for final hearing in the next week. [JUDGE]