-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.3400 OF 2008 Mr.Appa Bapu Patil & Ors. : Petitioners (Orig.Deft.nos.1 to 7) V/s. Shree Raj Developers & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.Jitendra Sachdev for the petitioners. ... CORAM : A.A.KUMBHAKONI,J. DATE : MAY 21, 2008. P.C. 1. The petitioners have filed this Petition being aggrieved and dissatisfied by an order dated 15.4.2008 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel, whereby the ad-interim order granted by this Court has been continued till expiry of the appeal period, after rejecting the interim application (exh.5). 2. The only contention raised on behalf of the petitioners is that after exh.5 application was rejected, the respondents filed an application at exh.52 seeking extension of the ad-interim order for a period of 30 days. As the prayer of the respondents for extension of the -: 2 :- ad-interim order was for 30 days, the lower Court could not have extended the ad-interim order for a period of 90 days since the extension of 90 days is till the expiry of the appeal period. 3. I do not find any force in the aforesaid contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners. It is pertinent to note that an ad-interim order was granted by this Court on 28.2.2008 whereby it was to operate till the decision of the application (exh.5). This application (exh.5) ultimately came to be rejected on 15.4.2008. All that the trial Court has done by the impugned order dated 15.4.2008 is that the ad-interim order granted by this Court has been continued till the expiry of the appeal period. 4. In exercise of writ jurisdiction, it will be most improper for this Court to interfere with such an order. Therefore, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any merit in the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. In the result, the Writ Petition fails and is dismissed. (A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.)