THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.20203 of 2010 Dated: 05.10.2010 Between: Kota Narasimha Rao and others. .. Petitioner. And The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, And others. .. Respondents. ORDER: The petitioners complaining that respondent No.3, at the instance of respondent No.4, is harassing them by summoning them to the police station and threatening them to withdraw the criminal cases filed by them against the 4th respondent, filed the present writ petition seeking appropriate directions to respondent No. 3 not to call them to the police station and harass them. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 and 2 filed a counter affidavit, wherein it is specifically stated that basing on the complaint lodged by the 4th respondent against the petitioners, a case in Cr.No.20 of 2010 of P.S.Talur was registered against the petitioners, for the offence under Sections 506, 120 (B) IPC on 08.05.2010, and the 3rd respondent has taken up the investigation. It is also stated that the allegations made against the 3rd respondent are far from truth and invented for the purpose of filing the present writ petition, and the respondent police acted in accordance with law. Further, it is stated that the 3rd respondent never harassed nor asked the petitioners to withdraw the criminal cases registered against the 4th respondent, and only to escape from the criminal liability in the criminal cases, which are pending against the petitioners, the real facts are suppressed and the present writ petition is filed. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the 3rd respondent is directed not to call the petitioners to the police station frequently and harass them, except as required under law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU,J 5th October, 2010 v v