IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1077 OF 2002 (MS) (Old No. 23065 of 1999) Naini Papers Limited and another. …..Petitioners. Versus Controlling Authority and others. ……….Respondents. Mr. Kurban Ali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. Kurban Ali, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 28.10.1997 passed by the respondent no. 2/ Prescribed Authority by which a penalty of Rs. 1,00,191.00 (one lac one hundred ninety one) has been imposed upon the petitioner under U.P. Regulation of Building Operation Act, 1958. Against the order dated 28.10.1997, the petitioner filed an appeal before respondent no. 1, which was dismissed on 2.1.1998 and consequently a revision was filed against the order dated 2.1.1998, which was also dismissed on 7.5.1999. Now, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. However, learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Kurban Ali states that consequent to filing of this petition in the year 1999, the penalty has already been deposited by the petitioner and he no longer wants to contest the present writ petition. On the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 10.12.2009 Rathour