Q 66 to 72 % 02.05.2011 Present: Mr. S.N. Kumar, Advocate with Mr. K.B. Soni, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate for the respondents. Caveat No.366/2011 in FAO No.214/2011 Caveat No.367/2011 in FAO No.215/2011 Caveat No.368/2011 in FAO No.216/2011 Caveat No.369/2011 in FAO No.217/2011 Caveat No.218/2011 in FAO No.218/2011 Caveat No.371/2011 in FAO No.219/2011 Caveat No.370/2011 in FAO No.220/2011 Since the respondents have appeared through counsel therefore the caveats stand discharged. + FAO No.214/2011 and C.M. No.8537/2011 (stay) FAO No.215/2011 and C.M. No.8538/2011 (stay) FAO No.216/2011 and C.M. No.8539/2011 (stay) FAO No.217/2011 and C.|V|. No.8541/2011 (stay) FAO No.218/2011 and C.|V|.No.8542/2011 (stay) FAO No.219/2011 and C.M. No.8543/2011 (stay) FAO No.220/2011 and C.M. No.8544/2011 (stay) In FAO Nos.198/2011 and 199/2011 on 25.4.2011, I passed the following order:- 0 "Counsel for the appellant states that though the impugned order dated 31.3.2011 be sustained, however, an opportunity be granted, to the petitioner no.l to take steps, as per law and due procedure, for taking action including of removal, of the respondent/plaintiff from the governing council of the petitioner No.l. If such show cause notice is issued, the petitioner no.l will be bound to follow the procedure as prescribed by rules and applicable law. Giving the aforesaid liberty for issuing of a fresh show cause notice and thereafter FAO No.214/2011 & conn. Matters page 1 of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified o deciding the issues in accordance with the law and applicable procedure, the present appeals and the applications stand withdrawn by sustaining the impugned order dated 31.3.2011." The present appeals are also identical and therefore would stand disposed of by similar directions as passed on 25.4.2011 and which shall be read as part and parcel of the order. Learned counsel for the respondent contends that the appellants have issued notices even in the present cases not covered by the order dt 25.4.2011 by stating that the High Court has dir;ected it to be so when it is not so. Though this may be true, however, that cannot take away the legal right of the appellant No.l to take necessary action for expulsion of the respondents, provided the same is in accordance with law and the rules of the association. The objection of the respondent thus holds no water. In view of the above, the present appeals are also disposed of in terms of the order dated 25.4.2011 passed in FAO No. 198/2011 and 199/2011. MAY 02, 2011 VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J. Ne FAO No.214/2011 & conn. Matters page 2 of 2