IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37302 of 2008 RAJENDRA RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 17.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the daughter of the informant may be traceless but there is no evidence to conclude her death and only presence of gamchha that also without proper identification, the petitioner has been alleged for killing his wife. Further there is no identification of the dead body. It is yet to be verified by the medical report but in the case the wife of the petitioner is traceless and there is no reaction on his behalf, in that circumstance, near the dead body, petitioner’s gamchha is said to remain. As such I find no substance in the doubts raised by learned counsel. The prayer for bail is rejected. In case, the case is committed to the court of Sessions, the Sessions Judge, Rohtas will take step to expedite the trial of Rohtas P.S. case no. 35 of 2006. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI