In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl.M.No. M-25398/2010(O&M) Date of decision: 1.9.2010. Rohit ....................Petitioner. v. State of Punjab .....................Respondents. Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh. Present:- Mr.SS Majithia,Advocate for the petitioners Jaswant Singh,J.(Oral). Prayer under Section 438 Cr.PC is for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.462 dated 28.10.2009 under Sections 3,4,5 and 7 of the Immoral Traffic Act, PS Sadar,Amritsar. As per allegations in the FIR, one Manjinderpal Singh @ Sonu with the help of his friend i.e. petitioner-Rohit was involved in the business of flesh trade by bringing women from places like Delhi etc., and also bringing the customers. It was further alleged that they had brought a girl aged about 19 years from Delhi and were finding a customer for her. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was not apprehended at the spot by the raiding party and he is not the same Rohit son of Kalu named in the FIR. After hearing the learned counsel, I find no ground to extend the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In the secret information received by the raiding party the petitioner was specifically named alongwith his co-accused to be involved in flesh trade. The girl namely Sonam @ Narinder Kaur recovered from the spot had also named the petitioner alongwith his co- accused to be the one who had brought her for indulging in flesh trade. In view of the above,no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Dismissed. 1.9.2010 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge