$7 6t0$ HIGH COURT OF (*HHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ' Writ Petition (S) No. 2339 of 26%: PETETIONERS : 1. Madan Ram Yadav, S/e Shri Banganjhu Ram Yadav, aged about 5i vears. Assistant Teacher. Government Middle ‘ Scheel, Tangargaea, Block Kansabel, District Jashpur Nagar (CG). 2. Chhagan Ram Bhagat S/o Shn' Gina Ram Bhagat, aged about 49 years. Upper Division Teacher, Tribal Girls Middie School, Bagbahar, Block Patthalgaon, District Jashpur Nagar (CG). VERSUS RESMNDENTS t 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Education Department, DKS Bhawan. Raipur (CG). Assistant Commissioner, Tribal & Welfare Department, Jashpur Nagar (CG) 3. Block Educataort Officer, Kansabel, District Jashpur Nagar (CG). 4. Block Education Gffrcer. Patthaigaon, District Jashpur Nagar (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THF CONSHTUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) OI Present : Shri Anil Mourya, Advocate for the petitioners, Shri Amrito Das, Panel Lawyer for the State/respoodents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 13m day of June, 2008) With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 1. The petitioners were appointed as Assistant Teachers on fixed pay of Rs. 1501-. After completion oftwo years of probation period, they were granted regular pay scale. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale wef. the date initial appointment or aBer completion of probation period. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State ‘ 19 Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant //’ / , . / / ,/ (/// 5 Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. & others), wherein it was held that. the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale wef. the date of initial appeintment. The matter was taken up to Hon‘ble Supreme Ceurt in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892f93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hegi'ble Supreme Court upholdizig the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the I Teachers/Assistant Teachers ate'entitled to regular pay seale from date of initial appointment. ‘ . In View of the above stated submissions made by learned counsel for the patties, the writ petition is disposed of iii the same terms i.e. the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation, if So advised, to consider their ease, ifthey stand on the same footings as per order dated 24.08.1992 h f the Madhya Prasesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, in 0A. No. 2745 of 89‘ Madh‘akaiL -adu (Supra) , and subsequently contained by order datedz03.01;1994 passed bythe Hon’ble Sapre..1e Court in Special Leave Petition {CiviD No. 6892/93 and giant relief accordingly. . In View of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/— j Satish K. Agnihotri , . ‘Judge r