WP(C) 589/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P.KATAKEY Heard Mr RC Paul, learned counsel for petitioner. Also, heard Mr S Saikia, learn ed Standing Counsel for PWD appearing for the respondent Nos.1,3,4 & 5, as well as Mrs VL Singh, learned State counsel appearing for respondent No.2. The claim of the petitioner in the present petition is that although in the year 2005 he had completed the works allotted to him, an amount of rupees fo ur lakh ninety-nine thousand three hundred and thirty-one, due and payable to hi m for execution of such works, has not been paid by the respondent authorities a s yet. The matter in issue has already been answered in Tamsher Ali v State of Assam & others, reported in 2008 (4) GLT 1. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the dire ction contained in the aforesaid case. Name of the petitioner will accordingly b e registered and payment would be released to him in terms of direction containe d in the aforesaid case. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.