IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29417 of 2010 PRAMOD RAY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kharik P.S. Case No. 173 of 2008 registered under Sections 302,307, 34, 120B of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms act. It is alleged against 10 persons of making indiscrimate firing causing injury to the brother of the informant who ultimately succumbed to injury. Considering the general allegation of firing against all F.I.R. named accused persons and Pawan Yadav has been granted regular bail, I do not think that the petitioner deserves any different treatment. Hence on that ground, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, the learned court below may consider the regular bail application of the petitioner considering the fact that other 2 similarly situated accused persons have been granted regular bail and will prefer to dispose off the regular bail application on the same day if possible. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)