Crl. Misc. No. M-10952 of 2011 (O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-10952 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 8,2011 Suresh Kumar .......................................................... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ........................................ Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner has referred to the representation which has been made to the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, (Annexure P-5) in which he has narrated that there is a dispute between the petitioner and the landlord and vide order dated 8.11.2010 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Ludhiana, (Annexure P1) the parties have been directed to maintain stauts-quo over the suit property. After this order has been passed, FIR No. 143 dated 27.11.2010 under Sections 447/448/511/506 IPC was registered at Police Station Division No.1, Ludhiana. After investigation, cancellation report was prepared and FIR was cancelled. The allegation in the representation is that S.H.O. Nirmal Singh and Hawaldar Paramjit Singh are seeking bribe from the petitioner to the extent of `50,000/- despite the Crl. Misc. No. M-10952 of 2011 (O&M) [ 2 ] cancellation of FIR. This criminal miscellaneous is disposed of with a direction to the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, to look into the representation (Annexure P5) filed by the petitioner along with copy of this order and take appropriate action in accordance with law. 8.4.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE