1 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.2550 of 2010 Yamini Hemant Palve ... Petitioner versus Hemant Ashok Palve ... Respondent ... Mr.R.D.Deshmukh for the petitioner. Mr.Sagar Kasar for respondent. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATED : 21st June 2010 P.C. 1. The writ petition is directed against the interlocutory order and consequently, I am not inclined to interfere. 2. Even otherwise, I do not find any error in the impugned order. A CD has been produced in the trial court. According to the respondent, it contains the conversation between him and the petitioner. The petitioner denied the conversation and contended that it was not her voice. As such, trial Judge has directed the CD to be sent to a government expert for his opinion. The evidential value of the opinion would be determined only after the opinion comes and the expert is examined as a witness. At this stage, there is no need to interfere in the impugned order. Petition is accordingly rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK,J.)