IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 5TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 14TH BHADRA 1930 WA.No. 1862 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.17233/2005 Dated 28/10/2005 .................... APPELLANTS:3RD PARTY: ----------------------------------------- 1. PHILIP B., PLAMTHUNDIL, SOORNADU P.O., KUNNATHOOR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. CHARLS, PALLIVADAKKETHIL, SOORANADU P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. GEORGE, THANDALATHUVILA, SOORANADU NORTH P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. 4. SHAJIMON, EDAPPURAYIL VEEDU, SOORANADU P.O., KOLLAM. 5. JOHN, KOCHUMAKALIL, THEKKEMURI, SOORANADU P.O., KOLLAM. 6. STANLY, THODIKKATTY VADAKKETHIL, SOORANADU P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. 7. LIZY T.J., CHORAPOTTIL VEEDU, ELAVMTHITTA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. 8. SELVARAJAN, PALLITHEKKETHIL, SOORANADU P.O., KOLLAM. 9. JESEENTHA,BIJA BHAVANAM, SOORANADU P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. 10. TITUS, MAMTHOPIL VEEDU, SOORANADU P.O., KOLLAM 11. ABRAHAM KOCHAMAKADIL, THEKKEMURI, SOORANDUP.O.. BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR SRI.P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON Kss ..2/- ..2..... W.A.NO.1862/2008 RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. M.ASHRAF KUNJU, SAHIDA MANZIL, IRIPPKKULAM P.O., PALLIKKAL, ALAPPUZHA DIST. 2. THE KERALA STATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR CHRISTIAN CONVERTS FROM SCHEDULED CASTES AND THE RECOMMENDED COMMUNITIES LTD., NEAR RAILWAY STATION, NAGAMBADOM, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 3. THE DIRECTOR, VIGILANCE AND ANTICORRUPTION BUREAU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -4. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.T. RAVIKUMAR THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss J.B. KOSHY & THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------------ W.A.NO: 1862 of 2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th September, 2008. JUDGMENT Koshy, J. Writ petitioner in W.P(C) 17233/05 approached this Court for quashing Ext.P4 letter written by the second respondent requesting the first respondent for giving sanction to prosecute him. Petitioner in that case was accused No:8. The Learned Judge observed that without getting sanction from the competent authorities no steps can be taken against the petitioner and therefore there is no necessity to quash Ext.P4. It is only a request. It was also stated that based on the letter of the first respondent, it is for the competent authorities to pass orders. Nothing is stated in the writ petition against the appellants, who were not parties to the writ petition. 2. It is the contention of the appellants that they had filed representations. Learned Judge did not say anything on the same. It is for the competent authorities to decide the same, if permitted under law. We see no ground to entertain the writ appeal. Dismissed. J.B.KOSHY Judge THOMAS P. JOSEPH Judge jj 2 K.K.DENESAN & V. RAMKUMAR, JJ. ---------------------------------------------------- M.F.A.NO: ----------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT Dated: