BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) Nos.15790 and 16493 of 2011 1 P. ANANDHARAJ 2 G. SIVAMOORTHY ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) IN CRL.OP(MD)NO.15790/2011 M.R.RAMESH ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) IN CRL.OP(MD)NO.16498/2011 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI, CRIME NO.79/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT IN BOTH THE PETITIONS For Petitioner : M/S. D.SHANMUGARAJA SETHUPATHI IN CRL.OP(MD)NO.15790/2011 For Petitioner : M/S. K.DINESH BABU IN CRL.OP(MD)NO.15790/2011 For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, in both the petitions Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD)No.15790 of 2011 and the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD)No.16498 of 2011 have been arrayed as accused for the alleged offences under Sections 120(b), 419, 468, 471 and 420 IPC in Crime No.79/2011 on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD)No.16498 of 2011 would submit that the petitioner has been arrayed as A-1 and he has been implicated on the allegation of fabricating a false document in respect of the property belonging to the de-facto complainant. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD)No.15790 of 2011 would submit that the petitioners have been implicated only on the allegation of attesting the subsequent documents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the first accused is said to have fabricated a false document in respect of the property belonging to the de-facto complainant and he executed a sale deed in respect of the other accused. 5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 6. It is seen that the main allegation of fabricating the document is levelled only against A-1. However, it stated that the said document was already seized and A-1 was also interrogated. As far as the petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD)No.15790 of 2011 are concerned, they have been implicated only on the allegation of attesting the subsequent documents. Considering the above said facts, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD)No.15790 of 2011 are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai, on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police for a period of four weeks daily at 5.30 p.m., and thereafter they shall be available for interrogation as and when required. 8. Accordingly, the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD)No.16498 of 2011 is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police for a period of six weeks daily at 5.30 p.m., and thereafter he shall be available for interrogation as and when required. Sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, MADURAI 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. D.SHANMUGARAJA SETHUPATHI Advocate SR.No.44752 +1. CC to M/S. K.DINESH BABU Advocate SR.No.44753 ssk/21.12.2011 /6c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.15790 and 16493 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/