1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5124/2009 Trilochan Singh vs RRVPN Ltd. & Ors. Date of order : 11.9.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. SKM Vyas, for the petitioner. Mr. AK Khatri, for the respondents. <><><> The petitioner was appointed on 7th March, 1975 as Instrument Mechanic in the services of the then Rajasthan State Electricity Board. The petitioner joined on the post on 13.3.1975. He was given revised pay scale of Rs.240-378 w.e.f. 1st April, 1977 and, thereafter, he was also given post of SBA-II and, thereafter also he was given revised pay sale time to time. From 1st Sept., 1986 the petitioner was given benefit of jump and given pay scale of Rs.1225/-. The petitioner then retired on 31.1.2009 from service then respondent became wise and says that petitioner was wrongly fixed in the pay scale of Rs.1225/- on 1st Sept., 1986, whereas he should have been put in pay scale of Rs.1200/-. On this premise, after retirement of the petitioner an order has been passed for making correction in the service book of the petitioner as well as for recovery of the excess amount paid to the petitioner. 2 Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the reasons given in the reply. The petitioner who was appointed in the year 1975 and has been fixed in pay scale by specific order in the year 1986 and retired on 31.1.2001 cannot be subjected to this treatment of withdrawing the benefits, which were given to the petitioner as back as in the year 1986. The order fixing the petitioner in particular pay scale could not have been altered without giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and that too also could have been done in reasonable time. The respondents have no right to straightway pass the order for making any correction in the service book of the petitioner resulting into withdrawal of benefit of pay fixation and consequential recovery of the amount from the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition of the petitioner is allowed. The respondents are restrained from recovering any such amount from the petitioner and if the amount has not been paid to the petitioner on that ground, the same be paid to the petitioner. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-