^ 'BLE SHRI S. .C.C. N0. 645 OF 200S 1. Vishnu Dayai, S/o Late Roopchand, aged jt61 2. Vijay Kumar, S/o late Roopchand, aged about 51 years. 3. Shiv Kumar, S/o late Roopchand, aged about 46 years, 4. Shyam Sundar, S/o late Roopchand, aged about 41 years. 5. Anand Kumar, S/o late Roopchand,agsd about35years. All Residents of Sakti, Tehsil: Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. Versus ; 1. Shankar Lal Agrawal • S/o Gyaniram Agrawal, aged about 67 years. 2. Jagdish Prasad, S/o Ramphal Agrawal, aged about 46 years. Both R/o Sakti, Tehsil: Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. 3. Additional Coiiector, Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. 4. Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Present: Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, learned counsel for the applicants. ~eBT in the iight of the order passed by me today in M.C.C. No. 495 of 2006 and for the very same reasons setout by me in the above order, this M.C.C. is ordered as prayed for, however, subject to the applicants payin< cost quantified at Rs. 300/- to the Chhattisgarh High Court Lega! Services Committee within a period offifteen days from today. The costs shouid be paid by the concerned Searned counse! without seeking reimbursement of the same from the parties. Sd/- Chief Justice ^ <u>