IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.25746-M of 2010 Date of Decision:29.10.2010 Ranjit Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. A.S. Manaise, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.9 dated 11.2.2010 registered under Sections 354/506/34 IPC and offence under Section 3 of SC & ST Act added lateron at Police Station Dorangla, District Gurdaspur. It is stated that the petitioner is minor. Moreover, the petitioner is on bail for the offence under Sections 354/506/34 IPC. However, Section 3 of SC & ST Act was added subsequently. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Makhan Singh states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation. Accordingly, order dated 1.9.2010 is made absolute and the petition is allowed as such. 29.10.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE