KBP 1 CA-1851-101.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1851 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.312 OF 2010 [Sumitra Vs. Anusaya] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.V.S.Talkute, for applicants. Mr.Dilip Bodake, for respondent no.2. Mr.Vikas Mali, for respondent nos.7, 8, 11 to 15. CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 18 th AUGUST, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr.V.S.Talkute, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr.Dilip Bodake, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and Mr.Vikas Mali, learned counsel for respondent nos.7, 8, 11 to 15. This is an application for deleting the names of respondent no.9 Namdeo Gangaram Mang and respondent no.10 Baban Gangaram Mang from the cause title of the Second Appeal. Mr.Talkute states that respondent nos.9 and 10 have died leaving behind no heirs and legal representatives and these respondents were impleaded as formal parties in the suit and no relief was claimed against them. In view the above, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The names of respondent KBP 2 CA-1851-101.sxw nos.9 and 10 are deleted from the cause title of Second Appeal at the risk of the applicants. [R.G.KETKAR, J.] KBP 3 CA-1851-101.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1646 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.312 OF 2010 [Sumitra Vs. Anusaya] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.V.S.Talkute, for applicants. Mr.Dilip Bodake, for respondent no.2. Mr.Vikas Mali, for respondent nos.7, 8, 11 to 15. CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 18 th AUGUST, 2011 P.C. This is an application for impleading the applicants as party respondents/defendants in Regular Civil Suit No.435 of 1987 and consequently, as respondents in the Second Appeal. To be heard along with Second Appeal No.312 of 2010. [R.G.KETKAR, J.]