IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 6707 of 2000 Between: P.Subrahmanyam, son of P.Kodanda Ramaiah, R/o 29/427, Kothapeta, Vinukonda (PO) , Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Irrigation & Command Area Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Engineer-in -Chief, I & CAD Dept., (Adm, Wing), Erram Manzil Colony, Hyderabad. 3 The Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Rep. by its Registrat (J), Purani Haveli, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Direction or Order, more especially a Writ one in the nature of Writ of CERTIORARI calling for the records in O.A.No. 474/1995 before the Hon'ble AP. Administrative Tribunal and quash is order dt. 29/12/1999 in so far as it relates to remitting back the case to the Respondents to take appropriate action in accordance with the provisions of AP. Civil Services (Disciplinary Proceeding Tribunal ) Act. 1960 and consequently direct the that the petitioner should paid pension and gratuity with interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum from the dated of his refrement and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.PANDURANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEV. The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6707 of 2000 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner as well as his wife died and hence, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is a dismissed. However, if any Class-I heirs of the petitioner are available, they are at liberty to proceed with the subject matter, in accordance with law. No order as to costs. _____________ V.ESWARAIAH,J _________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY,J 27th July, 2009. Ivd/Dsr