HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR CRL.R.C.No. 1197 of 2005 O R D E R: When the case was called on 29.4.2011, there was no representation for the petitioner. On 11-08-2011 there is no representation either for the petitioner or for the 2nd respondent and hence, the case was posted to today ‘for dismissal’. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. This case arises u/sec.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The sole petitioner was convicted by the trial court and confirmed by the appellate court. 3. The conduct and attitude of the petitioner is patent from the fact that on 29.4.2011, on 11.8.2011 and on today there is no representation for the petitioner, though the case is posted to today ‘for dismissal’. It would appear that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the case. I see no reason to continue the case any longer where the petitioner does not appear to have any interest in prosecuting the case. 4. This revision is therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. _________________ K.G.SHANKAR, J Dt. 12.8.2011 Mjl/* HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR CRL.R.C.No. 1197 of 2005 Dt. 12-08-2011 Mjl/*