[1] DBCWP(PAROLE)NO. 8024/2010 VIJAY SINGH Vs. STATE & ORS. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION(PAROLE) NO.8024/2010 VIJAY SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. DATE OF ORDER :: 13.08.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENA V. GOMBER Mr. Nikhlesh Katara, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Yadav, Govt. Counsel for the respondents. **** Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Convict-petitioner has preferred this parole writ petition for grant of second parole of 30 days. The respondents in their reply have stated that application of petitioner was rejected by the District Parole Advisory Committee on the basis of adverse report given against petitioner by the Superintendent of Police. So far as conduct of petitioner in jail and during first parole period from 20.03.2009 to 08.04.2009 is concerned, the learned Govt. Counsel contended that the same was satisfactory. No documentary proof or any material has been placed to substantiate the adverse report given by the concerned Superintendent of Police. [2] DBCWP(PAROLE)NO. 8024/2010 VIJAY SINGH Vs. STATE & ORS. Since conduct of petitioner during first parole period and in jail was satisfactory, therefore, we are inclined to grant second parole to petitioner. Consequently, the writ petition is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Vijay Singh S/o Shri Liladhar shall be released on second parole of 30 days on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty thousand) with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) each to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent. It will be open for the Jail Superintendent to put any other condition to secure the presence of petitioner. A copy of this order may be sent to convict-petitioner for information and to Jail Superintendent concerned for compliance. (MEENA V. GOMBER),J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. /KKC/