IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26451 of 2011 Nathuni Tanti @ Nathuni Das Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02. 10.08.2011. After having heard Sri Bindhyakeshari Kumar, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, though petitioner who has come up before me at least on three earlier occasions with a similar prayer for bail as are detailed in paragraph-2 of the petition and having considered the contention in the light of the allegation, I am not inclined to allow the renewal prayer, specially when the solitary witness, i.e., Dr. Arun Kumar Singh is only to be examined. Let the trial court, i.e., Additional Sessions Judge, Benipur be directed to get produced Dr. Arun Kumar Singh who had held postmortem examination for his evidence. Let Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga and Civil Surgeon, Darbhanga be directed to take all steps so as to ensuring the production of Dr. Arun Kumar Singh who had held postmortem examination on the dead body of the deceased of Bahera P.S.Case No.158 of 2006. In case, it is found that Dr. 2 Singh was not the doctor who had held the postmortem examination, but still his name appears as a chargesheet witness, then the Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga shall ascertain his whereabouts and ensure that he is produced on the date next fixed in the case on which he receives the copy of the present order. The office of this Court as also the learned trial Judge trying Sessions Trial No.398 of 2008 shall ensure that a copy of the present order is dispatched duly to the Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga as also to the Civil Surgeon, Darbhanga so as to complying with the order of this Court. At any rate, the trial must be concluded within six months time from the receipt/production of a copy of the present order by the trial court. In case, the trial is not concluded within that period, the petitioner shall have the liberty to renew his prayer for bail. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)