IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.459 OF 2005 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.168 OF 2005 IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1361 OF 1988 PETITION NO.1361 OF 1988 PETITION NO.1361 OF 1988 Ajmera Housing Corporation & Ors..Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors....Respondents And Mrs. Piloo Fali Bomanjee & Ors...Applicants Mr. Shyam Mehta with Mr. P.A. Kabadi i/b. Doijode & Assocates for Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Janak Dwarakadas, Senior Counsel and Mr. Soli Cooper i/b. Purnanand & Co. for Respondent Nos. 3A to 3D. Ms. Geeta Shastri, AGP and Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni, Associate Advocate General for Respondent NO.1. Mr. B.A. Desai, Addl. Solicitor General with Mr. S.R. Rajguru and Mr. A.M. Sethna for Union of India. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE: 7TH JUNE,2006 P.C. . Heard parties. Considering what is set out Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within one week from today. For the sake of the record the amendment to be carried out by the petitioners 1 and 2. There being certain controversy about addressing the Court considering that the challenge is to the declaration under Section 6, Counsel for the petitioners will be heard in the matter. Newly added parties are allowed to file their independent vakalatnama. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J). J). J).