IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC No.: 121 of 2010. Decided on: 27.07.2010. __________________________________________________________ Bir Singh. … Petitioner. Versus P.C. Dhiman and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents. : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.1. None for respondents No.2 and 3. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): The only direction issued to the respondents vide judgment dated 10th May, 2007 rendered by this Court in CWP No.20 of 2006 was to consider the case of the petitioner. The matter has been considered. However, the petitioner could not be offered appointment. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. (Rajiv Sharma), J. July 27, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?