BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. TAMILVANAN CRL OP(MD) No.14302 of 2011 VIJAY, ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C4-Y.OTHAKKADAI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.462/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.RAMALINGAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDI, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused No.3 as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (criminal side) appearing for the respondent. 2.The petitioner, who is arrayed as A3 facing charges for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) and 307 I.P.C, and Section 3(i) TNPPDL Act in Crime No.462 of 2011, on the file of the respondent-police, has come forward with this application seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that while the petitioner and others were travelling in a bus, the alleged accused persons used filthy language against women and students and on questioning the same, they attacked the de-facto complainant and caused injuries. According to him, the petitioner is an innocent person. He further submits that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent has not disputed the fact that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital. He admits that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital and there is no bad antecedents against the petitioner and I find it just and reasonable to grant anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur and on executing a personal bond for a sum https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed. Sd/- 08/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MELUR 2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C4-Y.OTHAKKADAI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. V.RAMALINGAM Advocate SR.No.38375 ssk/09.11.2011 /5c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14302 of 2011 Date :08/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/