HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 11th May, 2009 First Bail Application No. 281 of 2009 Order on the bail application of the accused. Satendar S/o Mahendar …….. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party Case Crime No.545 of 2008 U/s 364 I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali Manglaur District Haridwar Hon’ble J. C. S. Rawat, J. Heard Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the accused/applicant; Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State; and perused the record. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; the fact that the statement of three witnesses, namely Pushpendra, Budh Singh and Smt. Birmala have been recorded on 26/11/2008 whereas the incident occurred on 09/11/2008; these witnesses have stated that they saw the deceased lastly in the company of the accused/applicant; learned counsel for the accused/appellant contended that there is no chain of circumstances which could lead to take inference that the accused/applicant is involved in the commission of the offence; the fact that the money which has been said to have been recovered from the applicant has no concerned with the money of the victim as alleged in the supplementary affidavit; and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case for bail. Let the accused/applicant Satendar be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 11.05.2009 Shiv