IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 8668 of 2008 Date of Decision: 8th December, 2010 __________________________________________________________ Roop Singh Thakur ….Petitioner Versus HPSEB & another ….Respondents. ___________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. ___________________________________________________________ For the Petitioner: Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate For the Respondents: Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. __________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, J (oral). The petitioner has already made a representation for the redressal of his grievances for stepping up of pay under FR-27. The same has been rejected by the respondent Board without a speaking order on 29th July, 1995. The representation ought to have been decided by passing a speaking order and that too after hearing the petitioner. 2. Consequently, Annexure A, dated 29th July, 1995 is quashed and set aside. The Secretary of respondent Board is directed to decide the representation by passing a speaking order after taking into consideration the legal points taken in 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 this petition including FR 22 and 27, within a period of two months after the production of a certified copy of this judgment. 3. In view of above directions, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 8th, 2010(ms)