[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1281 OF 2007 Sachin Vijay Sutar ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.Shekhar A.Ingawale advocate for applicant Mr.Rajesh More A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : APRIL 27, 2007 DATE : APRIL 27, 2007 DATE : APRIL 27, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.110 of 2006 of Islampur Police Station, Sangli. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. There are four eye witnesses to the incident. All of them have stated that at the relevant time, two deceased persons i.e. Dileep Patil and Vikram Patil were travelling on motor-cycle. At that time, the present applicant stopped the motor-cycle. At that time, he had sword in his [-2-] hand. Thereafter, all the accused persons assaulted Vikram and Dileep with weapons like sword, Koyata etc. Due to the said assault, Vikram and Dileep died. The material on record shows that the present applicant shared the common intention with the other accused. Hence, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail. 4. Application is rejected. Trial expedited. [Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.]