1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.1415 OF 2008 M/s.Sumeet Machines Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. S. Bhalchandran & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. J.P. Cama, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashok D. Shetty and Ms.Rita K. Joshi for the Petitioner. Mr. Bhavesh Parmar for Respondent No.1 & 2. Mr. Harihar Bhave with Ms. Manisha Pant i/b. Bhave & Co. for Respondent No.3. ..... CORAM :DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. June 25, 2008. P.C.: Rule, by consent of Counsel returnable forthwith. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents waive service. By consent of Counsel and at their request taken up for hearing and final disposal. The challenge in these proceedings is to a judgment dated 30th November 2007 of the Labour Court at Nasik in an application under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The order under Section 33-C(2) was passed on the 2 ground that the Petitioner failed to comply with an order passed by the Industrial Court on 28th November 2000 in a complaint of unfair labour practices. The aforesaid order dated 28th November 2000 passed by the Industrial Court has been set aside in a petition filed by the Petitioner herein, being Writ Petition 3071 of 2008. Since the order dated 28th November 2000 which forms the basis of the impugned order under Section 33-C(2) does not survive, the impugned order would have to be quashed and set aside. Learned Counsel has fairly not disputed this position. In that view of the matter, the petition has been taken on Board by consent. For the reasons aforesaid, the petition is allowed and the order of the Labour Court dated 30th November 2007 passed in Application (IDA) 16 of 2004 is quashed and set aside. Application (IDA) 16 of 2004 stands dismissed. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs. ......