IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 335 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 335 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 335 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra ] .. Applicant (Ori.Complainant) Versus 1. Dadasaheb N. Thombare & anr. ] .. Respondents (Ori.Accd.1 & 2) Mr. A.S. Gadkari, APP, for the applicant. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 26TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. The accused persons have not been identified. Other serious lacunas are also noticed. The view taken by the Ad-hoc Sessions Judge-3, Baramati, is a possible and reasonable one. No interference is called for. Leave to Appeal is rejected. Sd/- Sd/- [SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.]