1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12 OF 2008 Bansilal s/o Rupchand Sancheti ...PETITIONER VERSUS Champalal s/o Ramchand Mugdiya ...RESPONDENT ..... Shri P.F. Patni, Advocate for the petitioner Shri D.P. Palodkar, Advocate for the respondent ..... CORAM : S.P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 19th June, 2009. ORAL ORDER : 1. Both the learned counsel submit that the learned Judge against whom the allegations were made in the present petition for transfer, has been transferred in the routine course and, therefore, nothing survives in the present petition. 2. In view of the said submission, since the learned Judge, against whom the allegations were made in the present transfer petition, has been 2 transferred in the routine course as stated by learned counsel for the parties, nothing survives in the present Misc. Civil Application and, therefore, the same stands disposed of. Interim stay stands vacated. 3. In view of the aforesaid position, the learned Jt. Civil Judge, Junior Division, Vaijapur is directed to hear Regular Civil Suit No.38/2003 and decide the said suit as expeditiously as possible. 4. It is seen from the order passed by this Court on 10.10.2008 that directions were issued to learned Principal District Judge that in case if he desires, then he is at liberty to enquire into the allegations made against the learned Judge through his office independently and submit a report to this Court confidentially. However, it is reported that such report, if any, has not been received so far. Hence, in view of the said position, if the learned Principal District Judge has not initiated any enquiry against the said learned Judge as aforesaid, there is no necessity to conduct such enquiry since the Misc. Civil Application has been disposed of, as aforesaid. (S.P. DAVARE, J.) fmp/mca12.08