H!€3H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.{C} NOAQ?’ of 2W9 Kuideep Sh‘arma, Slo Late Shri Sukhnandan Prasad Sharma, Aged about 39 years, R/o Kirari, Tahsu Masturi, District Bi!aspur(CG) PETiTiONER Versus RESPONDENTS xm State of Chhamsgarh, Through: Chief Secretary, Law and LegislatWe Affairs Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) 2 Additional Secretary, Law and Legislative Affairs Department, D.K.S. Mantralaya, Raipur(CG) 3 District and Seesion Judge, Biiaspur (CG) 4 Aehok Kumar Jangde, S/e Shri Aghan Das Jangde, Aged about 39 years, R/o Sargawan, Posi Masturi, Tahsii Masturi, District Biiaspur(CG) WRIT §ETHEQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNS'HTUTNON OF lNatA Appearance : Shri Ratneah Kumar Agarwai, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Amrito Das, Pane! Lawyer for the Stateirespondents t & 2. None for respondents 3 & 4. GRAL ORDER (22.01.2019) SUNRL KUMA SINHA, J. Heard. Petitioner Kuideep Sharma has fiied this petition fer the foiiowing reliefs: “50.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call fer the entire regards pertaining to the petition i of the petitioner. r ’3‘ 10.2 That, the Hon’bie Court may kindiy be pieaseci to issue a writ of certiorari thereby directing to the @ WRIT PETETION {C ) NO. 193 of 2W9 respondeni authorities to revoke the certificate of the notary profession issued by the respondent No.2. 1&3 Thatihe Hon’bie Court may kindiy be pieaeed to direct the respondents to issue notary profession certificate in favour ef petitioner. i 10.4 That, any other retief, which may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and oitoumstanoes of the case, may atso be atiowed.” The petitioner, thus, is chaiienging the certificate issued by respondent No2 in favour of respondent No.4 fer performing the work of notary in the concerned area. Learned counset fer the petitioner submits that the petitioner ts also present before this Court and he has informed that respondent No.4 has died during the pendency of thts writ petition. Learned counsei submits that since respondent No.4 has died, now, a fresh process for appointment of notary has to take piace and in this View of the matter, he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to the petitioner to participate in the fresh process, which may take ptace on account of death of respondent No.4. Permission granted. Accordingiy, W.P.(C) No.tO3 of 2009 is disposed of, as withdrawn with a/tibér’tytotthe petitioner that he shalt be free to participate in the process of fresh appointment, if the same takes piece on account of death of respondent No4//K’/ /