IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35659 of 2011 Surendra Singh S/o Laldeo Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 25.10.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in the name of the petitioner in the cause title. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail as he apprehends his arrest in connection with Forest Case No. 17F/2006 (Tr. No. 781/2011) for the offences alleged under Sections 33, 41, 42 of the Forest Act. According to the complaint petition filed by the forest officer Darigaon, Sasaram, it appears that on 11.10.2006, the complainant while on patrolling duty came upon a tractor loaded with stones chips alleged to have been illegally mined from the Ramanpur Reserve forest area and being taken away for sale in the market. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the petitioner has not even been named in the complaint. It is vehemently stated that neither the tractor nor the stones chips belong to the petitioner and he has been falsely implicated in the case in retaliation to an earlier complaint lodged by his father with regard to the involvement of forest authorities in illegal mining in 2005 itself. Considering the fact that the petitioner has not been named in the complaint nor there is anything to connect the ownership of the tractor or stones chips to the petitioner and also the fact that no recovery has been made from the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of production/ receipt of a copy of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sasaram District- Rohtas, in connection with Forest Case No. 17F/2006 (Tr. No. 781/2011), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Fahad. ( Vikash Jain, J. )