MC 1292/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P.KATAKEY Heard Mr KD Chetri, learned counsel for applicant. Also heard Mr J Sarma, learne d state counsel appearing for state respondents, and Mr AB Choudhury, learned se nior counsel for the respondent nos.4 to 7. The applicant, who is the writ petitioner in WP(C) no.599/2011, by this application is praying for amendment of the pleadings in the writ petition by wa y of insertion of 3A, 5A, 6B and 7C as well as replacing the earlier prayer by the new ones made in this application. Having heard learned counsel for appearing parties and on perusal of the averments made in this application, I am of the view that the amendment sought for is necessary for deciding the dispute between the parties effectively and co mpletely. The proposed amendment will also not change the nature of the proceeding in WP(C) no.599/2011. In view of the above, the amendment as sought for is allowed. This miscellaneous application stands allowed.