CRLR No. 64 of 2011 with CRMA No. 332 of 2011 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. None present for the revisionist even in the revised call. Perused the impugned order dated 08.12.2010, passed by Judge, Family Court, Nainital, in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 03 of 2009. Having gone through the said order, this Court does not find any error of law committed by the trial court in directing the revisionist to pay maintenance at the rate of ` 2,000/- per month to his wife, and ` 1,000/- per month to the minor daughter. The revisionist is said to have been working in the Police Armed Constabulary, and his salary is more than ` 12,000/- per month. On the other hand the respondents are unable to maintain themselves. The revision is dismissed summarily. (Stay application no. 332 of 2011, also stands disposed of ). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Parul 08.06.2011