S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1847/95 (Smt.Seema Sharma vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) DATE OF ORDER : 9/9/2008 HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.S.N.Trivedi, for the petitioner. Mr.B.L.Bhati, Government Counsel. Learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that controversy involved in this case is covered by the decision of Division Bench of this Court in case of Om Prakash Sharma vs. State of Raj. & Ors. reported in 2001(2) WLC (Raj.) 466 in which Division Bench of this Court held that the condition vide clause no.18 inserted in the circular dated 10/6/1998 was valid and a person who studies may further apply for improving his marks but cannot claim preference over others with such later on improved marks and on the basis of said condition termination from the service of teacher was held to be valid. In the present case, petitioner claimed her consideration for the purpose of appointment to the post of Teacher on the basis of improved marks. The vacancies in question were notified way back in 1995. There is no interim order in favour of petitioner keeping any post reserved for her. The process of selection for appointment on the post of teacher in pursuance of advertisement in question is over long back. In view of the aforesaid Division Bench judgment, no ground is found to grant any relief to the petitioner. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous as well as in view of the aforesaid Division Bench decision. (DR.VINEET KOTHARI), J. item no.15 baweja/-