1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.278/2011. (Mahada @ Mahadeo Namdeo Karle Vs. The State of Mah.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.SD Deshmukh, Adv. for applicant; Mr.NB Patil,APP for State. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 21 st February, 2011. ... 1) Heard. 2) In a long-drawn feud between two groups, the accused/applicant is now facing a private complaint for an offence under Sections 452, 394, 323, 143, 147, 149, 504 and 506 of Indian Penal Code. The principal contention is, the accused/applicant sneak away, with others, Rs.50,000/- and his associates assaulted the complainant. Even if recovery of Rs. 50,000/- is to be made, however, the earlier controversies between the groups illustrate that the private complaint is a counter to dilute the effect of earlier prosecution initiated by the accused/applicant. Though yet recovery of Rs.50,000/- is indicated, however, for that purpose, custodial interrogation is not warranted. The earlier interim protection dated 27th January, 2011 is made absolute, Same attendance till 30th June, 2011. 3) Criminal Application allowed as above. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/