IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16577 of 2011 Bhubneshwar Sharma @ Bhusneshwar Sharma Versus The State Of Bihar Thru.Vig. ----------- 04. 21.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No. 25/1992 (Special Case No. 39/1992) for the offences under Sections 13(2)/13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988, pending in the court of Special Judge Vigilance, Bihar, Patna. Learned counsel representing the Vigilance Department is not in a position to say anything in absence of any instruction from the Department for which he was granted several adjournments earlier. The petitioner in this seventeen years old case is named accused and submission is that in the 25 years of his service he has been alleged to have Rs. 6,86,680.15 paise, for which there is no account. He has already retired from service as early as in the year 1997. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and delayed investigation, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let 2 the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Vigilance, South Bihar, Patna, in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No. 25/1992 (Special Case No. 39/1992), subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)