IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI FRIDAY, THE 31ST JULY 2009 / 9TH SRAVANA 1931 RCRev..No. 11 of 2006() ----------------------- RCA.71/2003 of ADDL. DISTRICT COURT-II, KOZHIKODE RCP.6/2002 of MUNSIFF COURT, PAYYOLI .................... REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT. --------------------------------------------------- ALATHAM THAMMAL ABDULLATHEEF, S/O.MOIDEEN, AGED 37 YEARS, VADAYAM AMSOM AND DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAKESH ROSHAN SMT.THUSHARA.V RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS. --------------------------- 1. KAITHKADAVIL KUNJATH, CHERUPURAM AMSOM DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. BROTHER ANGADI PARAMBATH AMMAD HAJI, CHERAPURAM AMSOM, DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS FOR R1 & 2 THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. ------------------------ R.C.R.No.11 OF 2006 ------------------------ Dated this the 31th day of July, 2009 ORDER Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Sri.Rakesh Roshan, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, seeks time to verify as to whether the revision petition has become infructuous. This is a case where eviction was ordered on the grounds of arrears of rent and cessation of occupation. Though stay of execution was sought for, this court was not inclined to grant such stay. In all probability by execution proceedings the petitioner has been dispossessed of the building. We dismiss the RCR on the reason that the RCR has become infructuous. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE dpk