1 CA-5754.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5754 OF 2010 Brijesh Mohan Hari .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri Tanvir Shaikh for the Applicant. Shri J.P. Kharge, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JANUARY 18, 2011 P.C: 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a person who claims to be the owner of the property. The galas in question are in possession of the Court Receiver. The allegation is that the Court Receiver had put locks and seals and the applicant had broken the locks and seals on gala Nos.2A, 2B, 3 and 4. This was allegedly noticed by the complainant Mulchand Navalram Jain on 17-3-2009. The Court Receiver, however, found in his report dated 8-7-2009 that the seals were broken but the locks were intact. The learned counsel for the applicant also states that the DRAT has directed respondents 2 CA-5754.10 Seven Stars Securities Services (India) Private Limited, appointed as Receiver by the DRT, to hand over possession of the properties to the present applicant. In view of this, it is not clear as to what the investigating officer aims to achieve by subjecting the applicant to custodial interrogation. The application is, therefore, allowed. In the event of his arrest the applicant be released on bail by the Byculla Police Station, Mumbai pursuant to the complaint filed by Mulchand Navalram Jain in the Court of the learned Magistrate, 25th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai, Case No.161/Misc/2009 on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.50,000/- on the condition that the applicant shall report at the police station concerned on 24-1-2011 at 10:00 a.m. for interrogation and thereafter as and when required by the I.O.. The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and he shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the trial Court. 3 CA-5754.10 2. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicant may furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 3. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)