IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CR No.1477 of 2007 Date of Decision:-17.9.2009 Kirna ...Petitioner Versus Molu Ram and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.A.S.Sullar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Arvind Singh, Advocate for the respondents. A.N.Jindal, J. (Oral): Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the suit has been filed by the coparcener i.e. the daughter. In view of Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, if the plaintiff being the coparcener in the family has birth right in it. As such, sale, if any, effected without any legal necessity, would not divest her of her share, as such, no court fee was payable on the suit. However, counsel for the plaintiff-petitioner has agreed that the petitioner would make payment of Court fee as soon as mesne profits are determined by the trial Court at the time of final decision of the suit. In these circumstances, the present petition is allowed, the impugned order is set aside and the petitioner would certainly pay Court fee on the mesne profits as soon as the same are determined by the trial Court. (A.N.Jindal) 17.9.2009 Judge AS