HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1908/2003 (S/S) (Old no. 252/1997) Harish Chandra Bahuguna and three others. … Petitioners. Versus State and three others. … Respondents Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Dated: August 6, 2009: Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of the writ petition, the petitioners have been promoted in L.T. grade and in view of this fact the writ petition has become infructuous in so far the prayer nos. 1 and 2 are concerned. So far the prayer no.3 is concerned, the counsel for the petitioners prayed that petitioners may be permitted to move fresh representation before Director, School Education, Uttarakhand, Dehradun and he may be directed to decide their representation expeditiously. To this extent, learned Standing Counsel does not have any objection. 3. The prayer being innocuous, the petitioners are permitted to move fresh representation before the Director of School Education within a period of three weeks from today and in case such representation is filed within time, the Director, School Education, Govt. of 2 Uttarakhand, Dehradun is directed to decide the representation of the petitioners within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order. 4. With these directions, the writ petition is finally disposed of. No order as to costs. (V.K. Bist, J.) 06.08.2009 NCM: