1 appa48.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.48 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.402 OF 2004 Atul Ramchandra Sawal. ....Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ....Respondent. None for applicant. Ms. M.H.Mhatre, APP for State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- JANUARY 31, 2011. P.C. 1. None for applicant. This is second application filed by the applicant through jail. Record indicates that the applicant has already engaged advocate in the pending appeal being Criminal Appeal No.402 of 2004 to espouse his cause. Inspite of that, he has chosen to forward the present bail application through jail for reasons best known to him. As there is no changed circumstance, which would warrant consideration of bail application, we reject the said prayer. 2. The second relief claimed in the application is to expedite hearing of the appeal. The Appeal appearing under category “convicts in jail” are already 2 appa48.11 prepared as expedited category as per the present assignment. The appeal preferred by the applicant will have to proceed as per its turn in the said category. In the circumstances, even this prayer does not survives for consideration. 3. Accordingly, the application is disposed of. Office to proceed with the appeal as per its turn under caption “convicts in jail”. Copy of this order be forwarded to the Applicant forthwith for information. (A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)