IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-6189 OF 2008 Date of Decision : 11-3-2008 Ramandeep Kaur and Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus State of Punjab and others. ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. Sant Pal Singh Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners. RAJESH BINDAL J Notice of motion to Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. A.S.Brar, DAG, Punjab who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 – State. Mr. R.K.S.Brar, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 4 and 5. Mr. Brar on instructions from respondent no.4, who is present in Court, submits that the respondents do not have any objection to the marriage of the petitioners. In view of this statement of respondents, at whose behest the petitioners were apprehending danger to their life and liberty, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. March 11, 2008 (Rajesh Bindal) rekha Judge