1 (Review Petition 17 of 2010) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.17 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 156 OF 1984 Jeeghar Laxmichand Karani & Ors. ...Petitioners Vs. Dena Bank. ...Respondent ----- Mr.Satish Shah a/w. Mr. Jayesh Desai a/w. Mr. Shajab Dhorjiwala a/w Mr.Pranay Rajput i/b. Singhi & Co. for the Petitioners Mr. Karl Shroff for Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3. Mr.R.C. Shah i/b. Mr. A.R. Bamne for Respondent / Original Plaintiff. ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 14TH JANUARY, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners. The Petitioners have filed this petition seeking review of the order passed by this Court dated 23rd February, 2010. The reliefs claimed by the Petitioners are as under: 2 (Review Petition 17 of 2010) “a) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to review/recall and set aside or otherwise suitably modify the said order passed on 23rd February, 2010 by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.M. Kanade in Suit No.156 of 1984; b) That the admissibility of all the documents tendered by the Plaintiff (Respondent hereto) be directed to the reconsidered. c) That such further and other orders be passed as may be necessary in the interests of justice. d) For costs of this Petition.” 2. I have perused the impugned order passed by this Court. By the said order, this Court has recorded the submissions of the parties and has thereafter either 3 (Review Petition 17 of 2010) exhibited the documents or refused to exhibit the documents. In my view, there is no error apparent on the face of record and no case is made out for review of the order. It is clarified that merely because the documents are exhibited that does not mean that the proof of contents of the documents has been proved. It will be open for the parties to lead evidence to prove the contents of the said documents whenever it is required. 3. So far as the document at Serial No. 27 is concerned, I have not passed any order in respect of the said document as can be seen from paragraph 1 of the order. Review Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.)