IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3041 of 2011 UMESH KUMAR son of Late Ram, Resident of village Sevatha, P.S. Sandesh, DistBhojpur Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30.03.2011 After having heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and after having considered the order dated 22.09.2010 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ara in Trial No. 1764 of 2010 Chandi P.S. Case No. 51 of 2010, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order. However, the petitioner’s contention is that he is not named in the F.I.R. and in case vehicle which was seized from his son, it was sold to him quite earlier to the occurrence. If this be so, then the petitioner may raise this point at the time of framing of charge and the Court below shall pass a reasoned order. With the above observation, this petition is disposed of. Anand Kr. /Prakash ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)