IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 24TH KARTHIKA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 9229 of 2011 CRIME NO.881 OF 2011 OF EZHUKONE POLICE STATION, KOLLAM. PETITIONER/ACCUSED -------------------------------------- MURUKAN, RENJITH BHAVAN, IDAKKIDOM, KAREEPRA VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SYAM J SAM RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.K.RAJEEV THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------ Bail Appl. NO. 9229 OF 2011 ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 15th day of November, 2011 O R D E R This is an application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.881 of 2011 of Ezhukone Police Station, Kollam District. 2. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 323, 341, 307 and 450 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The prosecution case is the following: On 6.10.2011 at about 7.30 P.M., due to previous enmity, the accused trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and stabbed her indiscriminately with the scissors brought by the accused. The defacto complainant sustained serious injuries. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that there was civil dispute between the defacto complainant and the accused and in that civil case, the defacto complainant was successful. BAIL APPL. NO.9229 OF 2011 :: 2 :: 5. The petitioner was arrested on 9.10.2011 and he was remanded to judicial custody. 6. The investigation is in progress. The allegation is that the accused attacked a woman aged 35 years indiscriminately stabbed her causing serious injuries to her. If the petitioner is released on bail at this stage, it would adversely affect the proper investigation of the case. It is most likely that he would intimidate and harass the victim and the witnesses. It is also likely that the accused may tamper with the evidence. For the aforesaid reasons, the Bail Application is dismissed. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/