Criminal Misc.-M No. 33054 of 2011 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 33054 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 30.11.2011 Mohan Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Navkiran Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.B.S. Teji, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. P.K. Kataria, Advocate for the complainant. …… RAJESH BINDAL, J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 48 dated 04.09.2011 registered under Sections 326/323/324/506/34 IPC and 3/4 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes ( Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, at Police Station, Mattewal, District Amritsar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. In fact, he has fracture dislocation of right elbow resulting into 40% disability. He further submitted that it is not possible for him to cause injuries with sword, in fact, the petitioner himself has suffered grievous injuries for which a cross-case has been registered against the com- plainant. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the petitioner had caused injuries using his left arm. Besides the case in question, there are six other cases registered against the petitioner. However, out of those six cases, in one case he was convicted, in two cases cancellation report was filed and trial in three cases is still pending. Criminal Misc.-M No. 33054 of 2011 2 After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering kind of injury inflicted on the complainant and also antecedents of the peti- tioner, I do not find this to be a fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail to the peti- tioner. Dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 30.11.2011 sharmila