IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47763 of 2008 BINDESHWARI JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Sections 409 of the Penal Code. The submission is of subsequent deposit having been made by the petitioner of the amount in question after the institution of the F.I.R. The allegations are with regard to money of the Society of which the petitioner was the Manager. That subsequently the money has been deposited are matters not relevant in so far as an application for anticipatory bail is concerned. The subsequent deposit is an aspect to be properly considered in an application for regular bail without being prejudiced by the present order. The application is rejected. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)