fa217.92 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO. 217 OF 1992 Pandurang s/o Trimbak Godse .. APPELLANT VERSUS Dadabhau s/o Trimbak Godse & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. V.S. Bedre, advocate for the appellant. Mr. L.V. Sangit, advocate for respondent no. 1. ===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : AUGUST 02, 2011. PER COURT : 1 Mr. Bedre, learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to delete rest of the respondents except respondent no. 1. Leave granted. Name of the respondents excluding respondent no. 1 stand deleted at the risk of the appellant. 2 Parties to the dispute, that is, appellant and respondent no. 1 have settled their dispute amicably and the terms of settlement have been fa217.92 2 placed on record. Those are marked as ‘X’ for identification. Both the parties i.e. appellant and respondent no. 1 are present before the court and admit the correctness of the terms stated in the compromise. Parties are identified by their respective counsel and the terms of settlement are verified before the oath officer. Appeal presented by the appellant stands disposed of in terms of settlement marked ‘X’. Judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge, Sr.Dn., Sangamner on 29-2-1992 in Special Civil Suit no. 41/89 is quashed and set aside and the same is substituted in view of terms of settlement marked ‘X’. Decree in terms of settlement marked ‘X’ be drawn. Appeal thus stands disposed of. in the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. 3 In view of disposal of appeal in view of settlement reached between the parties, cross objection presented by respondent no. 1 does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb