:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3088 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3088 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3088 OF 2005 WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 333 OF 2006 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 333 OF 2006 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 333 OF 2006 Vijay Nathalal Gohil ..Applicant versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondents Mr. A. M. Saroagi for the Applicant. Mr. V.B. Konde- Deshmukh, APP for the Respondents - State. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & V. K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ. V. K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ. V. K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : 21ST MARCH, 2006 DATE : 21ST MARCH, 2006 DATE : 21ST MARCH, 2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. Rule in both the petitions, returnable forthwith. 3. These are the petitions for furlough leave. The application was rejected by the Authorities on the ground that there is threat to the witnesses. :2: 4. Learned APP has filed the report in this regard. The witnesses are staying in Chirabazar area as per the report filed by the L. T. Marg. Police Station, copy of which is taken on record. 5. Wife of the petitioner is present, she states through her Counsel, that if the petitioner is released on furlough leave, he will be staying at Tardeo during the period of his furlough and will report to Tardeo Police Station, every day. Upon these conditions, the petitioner be released on furlough leave as per the law and the rules therein. 6. Rule made absolute in both the petitions. (D.G. DESHPANDE, J. ) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)