Crl. Revision Nos.1362 and 2807 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Date of decision:- 10.08.2011 (1) Crl. Revision No. 1362 of 2010 (O&M) Savita and others ....Petitioners Vs. R. Balaganeshan ....Respondent (2) Crl. Revision No. 2807 of 2010 (O&M) R. Balaganeshan ....Petitioner Vs. Savita and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present:- Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate, for the petitioners (in CRR No.1362 of 2010), and for the respondents (in CRR No.2807 of 2010). None for the respondent/petitioner (R.Balaganeshan). ***** A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) This judgment shall dispose of Crl. Revision Nos. 1362 and 2807 of 2010, as both have arisen out of the same order of maintenance passed in favour of Savita and others-petitioners (herein referred as 'the petitioners). For reference, facts are taken from Criminal Revision No. 1362 of 2010. Assailed in these petitions is the order dated Crl. Revision Nos.1362 and 2807 of 2010 2 07.04.2010 passed by the District Judge, Family Court, Gurgaon, vide which respondent-R.Balaganeshan was directed to pay Rs.7000/- per month to the petitioners as maintenance allowance from the date of filing of the petition. It has been observed by the trial Court that respondent-R.Balaganeshan is a well qualified engineer and he was working with Telerax Communication, New Delhi, as Territory Manager and his last drawn salary was Rs.14,489/-, as stated by Sushil Kumar (PW-4). There is no such positive evidence on the record that if the respondent-husband has been incapacitated and is unable to earn anything. Similarly, there are no grounds for enhancement of the maintenance. As such, both the revision petitions are hereby dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 10th of August, 2011 JUDGE ajp