bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3044 OF 2009 PETITION NO. 3044 OF 2009 PETITION NO. 3044 OF 2009 Narsingh Ramdular Yadav ... Petitioner v/s 1. State of Maharashtra and ors. ... Respondents Mr.Mukesh Valji Aiya for the petitioner. Mr.R.M.Patne, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr.S.P.kanuga i/by Smt.S.N.Nath for the Resp.No.4. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 22ND APRIL, 2009 22ND APRIL, 2009 22ND APRIL, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition against the order dated 21.2.2009. By this order, the fair price shop has been allotted to the respondent No.4. The petitioner is entitled to avail of the remedy of a revision. The petitioner preferred the revision application on 3.3.2009. However, according to the petitioner, this revision application has not been heard as yet. The petitioner apprehends that the revision would not be heard in view of the prevailing circumstances in which the Code of Conduct is in existence. 2 2. Judicial or quasi judicial orders cannot be avoided to be passed only because the Code of Conduct is in operation. 3. In these circumstances, the revision application of the petitioner must be decided by the revisional authority within four weeks from today. 4. Parties will maintain status-quo as of today till then. 5. It is made clear that if no orders are obtained by the petitioner within four weeks from today, the allotment in favour of the respondent No.4 will take effect. 6. Writ petition disposed of accordingly.