cp245.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 245 OF 2010 Jaymala d/o Balaprasad Rathi .. PETITIONER VERSUS Shri Mahendrakumar s /o Ramkunwar Gupta & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. V.L. Dhoble, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.B. Ghadge, advocate for respondent no. 3. Mr. S.N Boiwar, advocate holding for Mr. S.R. Kolhare, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. ===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 13 th APRIL, 2011. PER COURT : 1 This court while admitting the writ petition on 21 st April, 2010, directed stay to he order passed by the school tribunal in respect of payment of backwages. It was further directed to the institution to re-instate the teacher in service as per the directions issued by the Presiding Officer of the tribunal. 2 It is stated that the order passed by this court was subject matter of challenge before the Apex Court in Special Leave Petition which came to cp245.10 2 be rejected. After rejection of the Special Leave Petition, it appears that steps are taken for complying the order passed by this court as well as the tribunal. It is stated by learned counsel appearing for the Education Officer (Secondary) that the contempt petitioner has been re-instated in service as an assistant teacher since 6-9-2010. It is also stated that the difference in amount of salary amounting to Rs.1,22,952/- has been transmitted to the accourt of the contempt petitioner maintained at Jalna Sahakari Bank, Main branch, Jalna. Copies of the orders passed by the Education Officer are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. In view of the orders placed on record and in view of substantial compliance of the order passed by this court on 21 st April 2010, nothing survives for consideration in the contempt petition. Contempt petition stands disposed of. 3 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE dyb