IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 2320 of 2000 Between: 1 The Chief Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise L.B.Stadium Road, Basheerbagh Hyderabad. 2 The Asst.Commissioner of Central Excise Subashnagar Nizamabad. 3 Union of India Rep.by its Secretary,Ministry of Finance Govt.of India New Delhi. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND Smt.Fateema Bee O/o.Asst.Commissioner of Central Excise Subashnagar Nizamabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a direction, order or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Cetriorari calling for records in OA.No.573-1999 on the filr of the Central Admn Tribunal,Hyderabad Bench and quash the order dated 3-11-1999, in the said O.A. and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.M.V.KRISHNA MOHAN The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU Writ Petition No.2320 of 2000 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ petition is ﬁled seeking to quash the order dated 03-11-1999 passed in O.A.No.573 of 1999 on the file of Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench. 2. The respondent is the applicant in the above O.A. while the petitioners are oﬃcial respondents. The Tribunal after considering the rival contentions, allowed O.A., thereby granting ‘temporary status’ on the respondent with eﬀect from the date of ﬁling of O.A. or from the day prior to the conferment of temporary status on the similarly situated juniors to the respondent. Aggrieved thereby, the official respondents preferred this writ petition. 3. Today, we have considered similar issue in Writ Petition No.2102 of 2000 and dismissed the same, while upholding the order of the Tribunal granting ‘temporary status’ on the respondent therein. Following the same and for the reasons stated in W.P.No.2102 of 2000, this writ petition is liable to be dismissed and it is accordingly dismissed. A copy of the order in W.P.No.2102 of 2000 be annexed to this order. No order as to costs. ___________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J. ___________________ C.V.RAMULU, J. 29-07-2008 bsc