BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S. TAMILVANAN CRL OP(MD) No.14232 of 2011 1 BASKARAN 2 PRABAKARAN 3 MANOHARAN 4 PRABU @ BASKARAN 5 MAHARAJAN 6 PARTHIBAN 7 KATHIRESAN 8 MUTHUMANI 9 SHANMUGAM 10 BALASUBRAMANI 11 PITCHAI 12 SENTHILKUMAR 13 VISWAM @ VISWAKUMAR 14 ANANTH ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs STATE THROUGH THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOODALPUTHUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI. ( IN CRIME NO.465 OF 2011 ) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.T.K.GOPALAN ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC. 438 CR.P.C. ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (criminal side) appearing for the respondent. 2.The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused facing charges for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 427, 323, 506(ii) and 307 I.P.C. in Crime No.465 of 2011, on the file of the respondent- police, have come forward with this application seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. A counter case was also filed against the other party. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that in the ward member election of the Panchayat, the de-facto complainant party won defeating the candidate of the petitioner/accused. He further submits that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent submits that the injured had already been discharged from https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the hospital. He further submits that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital and there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners and I find it just and reasonable to grant anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Madurai and each of them executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 08/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, MADURAI. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOODALPUTHUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC TO M/S.T.K.GOPALAN ADVOCATE SR.NO.38395. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14232 of 2011 Date :08/11/2011 2P/6C RPB : 09.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/