CWP No.20601 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURTOF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 20601 of 2008 Date of decision: 24.12.2008 Gulaba ....Petitioner. vs. Financial Commissioner,Haryana, and others. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.S.KHEHAR. HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR. --- Present: Mr.R.S.Mamli, Advocate, for the petitioner. -- J.S.KHEHAR,J. (Oral) Through the instant writ petition the petitioner has impugned the orders by which partition of land has been effected. The final order in this behalf has been passed on 4.9.2008 (Annexure P5) by the Financial Commissioner,Haryana. In order to demonstrate the effect of partition, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on the record of this case the site plan Annexure P9. We have perused the site plan. A perusal of the same reveals, that the petitioner has been assigned one complete killa number abutting the main road. Additionally, the petitioner has been provided land in one common connected tuck. The solitary contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is, that whilst the petitioner has been allowed only one killa number abutting the road, Gopi has been assigned more than three killa numbers abutting the road. We find no infirmity in the instant determination at the hands of the authorities, inasmuch as, the share of Gopi in the land in CWP No.20601 of 2008 2 question is more than twice the share of the petitioner, and as such, the action of the respondents in allowing Gopi more the land abutting the road was fully justified. The second contention advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner is, that three continuous killa numbers assigned to the petitioner are incomplete, and that this determination at the hands of the authorities would not be congenial to effective agriculture, inasmuch as, it would not be even possible to till the land in question properly. It is not possible for us to accept the instant contention at the hands of the learned counsel for the petitioner. It seems that the aforesaid contention has been advanced on the basis of lack of agriculture inputs. We are satisfied, that the land assigned in the three killa numbers to the petitioner, is sufficient for agricultural handling. No other contention has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner. For the reasons recorded hereinabove, we find no infirmity in the impugned orders, the instant writ petition is, accordingly dismissed. ( J.S.Khehar) Judge (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge December 24, 2008 rk