IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID FRIDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2011 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1933 RSA.No. 471 of 2003(F) ---------------------------------- AS.NO. 43/1999 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,PARAVUR OS.NO. 247/1991 of MUNSIFF COURT, PARAVUR .................... APPELLANTS/ APPELLANTS 2 TO 7/ PLAINTIFFS 1,2,4 AND 5 AND HEIRS OF DECEASED 3RD PLAINTIFF: -------------------- *1. KRISHNAN NAIR, S/O. GOVINDAN NAIR, MANIYELI VEETTIL, KADUNGALLUR KARA, KADUNGALLUR PAKUTHY.(DIED) 2. THANKAMMA, DO. DO. DO. 3. CHELLAMMA, DO. DO. DO. 4. GIRIJA, DO. DO. DO. 5. ARUN, DO. DO. DO. 6. AKHIL, DO. DO. DO. *ADDL.A7 TO A9 IMPLEADED *ADDL.A7: SARADA, W/O. LATE KRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 52,MANIYELI VEETTIL, KADUNGALLUR KARA, DO. PAKUTHY. *ADDL.A8: DHANYA K. NAIR, AGED 26, D/O. LATE KRISHNAN NAIR, DO. DO. *ADDL.A9: DEEPA K. NAIR, AGED 22, D/O. LATE KRISHNAN NAIR, DO. DO. *ADDL.A7 TO A9 IMPLEADED AS THE LR'S OF THE DECEASED FIRST APPELLANT VIDE ORDER DATED 28/5/07 IN I.A.NO.806/07. BY ADVS.SRI. S.ANANTHA SUBRAHMANYAN SRI.S.SHYAM SRI.N.K.KARNIS ADDL.A7 TO A9 BY ADV. SRI.S.VINOD BHAT SRI.BOBBY MATHEW KOOTHATTUKULAM sts 2/- -2- RSA.NO.471/2003 RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT/ DEFENDANT: ------------------------------------------------------------------- **1. RAGHUTHAMAN,S/O. UNNI MELPANA, MOOPATHADOM KARA, KADUNGALLUR PAKUTHY.(DIED) *ADDL.R2 & R3 IMPLEADED *ADDL.R2: BABY REGHUTHAMAN, W/O. LATE REGHUTHAMAN, AGED 60, RESIDING AT SREERANGAM, PANAYIKULAM ROAD, MUPPATHADAM.P.O., ALUVA (VIA) (DIED) *ADDL.R3: SHEEBA, D/O. LATE RAGHUTHAMAN, AGED 32, DO. DO. *ADDL.R2 & R3 IMPLEADED AS THE LR'S OF THE DECEASED SOLE RESPONDENT VIDE ORDER DATED 28/5/07 IN I.A.NO.744/05. ADDL.R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKETESH SRI.K.S.BHARATHAN THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts HARUN-UL-RASHID,J. ------------------------------- R.S.A. NO. 471 OF 2003 ------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2011 JUDGMENT This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.43/1999 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, N. Paravur. The original suit filed for recovery of possession of the plaint schedule property was dismissed. The appeal A.S.No.43/99 preferred by the plaintiff was also dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the plaintiff preferred this appeal. 2. Pending appeal the appellants and respondent arrived at a settlement regarding the subject matter of the suit. Accordingly, they filed I.A.1225/2011 praying to record the terms of compromise and pass a decree in terms of compromise. The terms of compromise is recorded and a decree is passed in terms of the compromise. I.A.No.1225/2011 shall form part of the decree. Appeal is disposed of in terms of compromise. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. kcv.