IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.6273 of 2010 MD. HADISH KHAN @ Md. Hadish, Son of Ram Jani Maian Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 12.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 365/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute arose on account of fishing. He further submits that the boy has come back to his house. Learned counsel for the State submits that the boy in his statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. has named the petitioner. In the circumstance, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)