4r [‘t IN THE mGH COURT OF JUDI CATURE MI, BIIJK$PUR (CHHQ’I‘TI SGARH) wan Ne. égL/ of 2002 Petitione}; : Rama Gond S/a Achhu. Gond Ageé 35 yea‘vs’ R/o village, Neuargaon Eghurda, Tahail and Di stri ct - Kax-mrdha Cd}. ) / -Vs~ Gram ‘Pancbyqt hen D1 «tt. rgaon nmwrvdga :hu d3, (Cw rah g 11 wMug/Q and ~5‘WFW’J Chief m;ecut1ve Offlcer amid Additional Collector, Jila ?anchayat, liaxvzardha. Di Cclleotor, strict - KawardhaYC awardha G- ) Addl tlolml Comma. saloner, Rwlpur E1 V1 “ion. Rulpur. State o; onhgwusawh. V" Ejgandents : 1) gpy W WW #WWm HRI‘ P‘TITIGN UNEER Imi‘ICLEI; 22v 227 OF TEE COiwTITUTION OI' INDIA ( K XI-HC—22 1 1.07.2003 Shn' Ajit SiDgh, counsel for the petitioner. e Shri Ranbir Singh, GovLt Adv. for the State. Shli Ptashant Jaiswal, counsel for the Caveator-Iespondent no.1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the onier dated 14.02.2002 [Annexure P—8] dsmism‘ng the appeal pmfened by the pen'tioner against the otder of Chief Executive OEcer, Jila Panchayat, Kawaxdha whemby the lease granted in favour of the petitioner has been cancelled. It is not disputed thaf Condition No.13 of the lease deed pmhibits the leaseholder mm entering into contract with any 0%“ person. On an allegation being made that the petitioner has conuavened the said condition, a show cause notice was issuedto and an enquily was conduqted against the petitioner. In that enquiiy it was held that the was gmnted had, in contm ntion of Condition No.13, enteied into a partnership agxeemen with Bhagatram and Dakor Singh. As a matter of fact and; as h'tioner in whose favour the lease impuwed order discloses the fact v é WeW w that the petitioner lessee agreement with Bhagau‘am and in his evidence. It is not dispu d that the lease was cancelled after notice and after g‘ving a d petitioner. An appeal pxefene Iejected. In view of the factual nnding arm'ved at, the Court is of the opinion that the Older impugned does not sun'er nom any illegality so as to warrant any interfexence by way of this writ petition. Accordingly, the petin'oni stands disposed. entered into a partnership or Singh was admitted by him e opportunity of hearing to the i by the peu'tioner has been (\w i I Sd/- i P.CaNaik Judge new” we éfail