IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13947 of 2004 CHATURBHUJ SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 9 23.1.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. From perusal of the various orders passed in the present writ application the dispute narrow down to sum of Rs. 35,000/- only according to learned counsel for the petitioner. He does not deny G,P.F amount have been paid but from perusal of the calculation chart which is his statement that he had paid back of the loan and the same reflected in the account and that is why Rs. 35,000/- has been deducted.. This is an area which falls in the realm of accounting and no decision is required to be taken by the Court. It is left open to the petitioner to furnish evidence of payment if a loan was taken against his G.P.F account and if he satisfies the respondents, then necessary follow up action may be taken otherwise the amount would be treated as having been reconciled. Needless to the say that if the petitioner succeeds in establishing repayment of the loan then this amount will be paid to him if wrongly deducted. This writ application is disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)