IN THE HON'BLE HIGH C^URT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) (Contempt Case (C} No..... LO.^......./U) BiigleC® ^ PETITIONER sM ^ CSPONDENTS : CONTEMNORS Mehar S/o Late Shambhuram Mehar Age About 65 year R/o Palace Road Raigarh, Tah. & Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. Umesh Agrawal Joint Director, Treasury Account and Pension Bilaspur Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. ^ B^^^t^ l(?-^u^ District Education Officer Raigarh (C.G.) CONTENPT CASE fCVUNDER ARTICLE^jS^F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT ,..^S!SES XI-HC-22 3TI^T^T h^ w^i '^TW^rfi^ ^ \. ^. ^ ~3'5E[ "^l^lld^. ^Ti1^ii(o\ l®i<ni^y STli^T XRf^ Wfl^TT 5h^icb<*<*' "*"*"*'^y^Fl 200 'fN^sr' 3Tit?r'^frsjT ^TT SB: HQN'BLB SHM MANIHDftA MOHJUI 8HRIVASTAVA.J. 28.7.2011 been| coniplied Shri S.D» Sin^gh, counse| None for respondent No.| Office report shows that| Leamed counsel for fhd not want to press fhis petiti<|>n passed by this Court has Takiag iato learaed counsel for fhe petitiojaer Court has been complied wi1(h, farther ui fhe anatter. The rule is discharged. The petition is disposed |of consideratlon for fhe petitioner. .11. Inotice has not been served. petitioner subiaits fhat he does <|>n at present because fhe ojxler wifh, t, the submission made by fhat fhe oider passed by this ({h, I am not mclined to proceed chl^(<vt<flrl HH<ylT1? f^^1 <F31^1< ^ STf^TH 3TT^T Sd/- ManindraMohan Shrivastava Judge L r-:^ ^^