IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 18839 of 2010 Date of Decision: 14.10.2010. Raj Pal and others --Petitioners Versus The M.D., H.P.G.C.L., Electricity Bhawan, Sector 6, Panchkula & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Ravinder Hooda, Advocate for the petitioners. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Land of the petitioners' family was acquired for establishment of the Thermal Power Plant at Panipat. The respondents had taken a policy decision dated 6.5.1984 to provide employment to at least one member of the family. The aforesaid policy was followed by another policy dated 7.4.1992. The petitioners claim employment under the aforesaid policy. It seems that the petitioners were even not born at the relevant time, however, it is stated that no other member of the family was given employment. Petitioners have made representation (Annexure P-2) which has not been considered. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners in accordance with law and the aforesaid policy decision, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the competent authority. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioners is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 14.10.2010. lucky