IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33767 of 2008 BIRMANI PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 4.9.2008 Heard. The co-accused Sheo Kumar Rabidas is alleged to be demanding Rangdari both from jail and also from outside when he was released from jail. That accused was at the house of the informant to realize Rangdari a hulla was raised by the informant and the accused Sheo Kumar Rabidas was caught who stated that it was this petitioner Birmani Pandey who had sent him for realizing the extortion money. The contention is that the petitioner does not have anything to do with the incident and that on account of some individual differences between the informant who was the Mukhiya and petitioner who is the Up-Mukhiya the petitioner’s name has wrongly been dragged. Regard being had to the facts and the contentions, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/-(three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawadah in Pakribarawan P.S.Case no.47 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )