1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 4353 of 2008 Smt Kamal v. EO and ors ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr N.D. Khamborkar, Adv for petitioner. Mr Gopal Mishra, Adv for respdt no.1. Coram : D.D. Sinha and A.P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 2nd March 2009 1. Heard Mr N.D. Khamborkar, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr Gopal Mishra, learned counsel for respondent no. 1. 2. Though the petition is directed against the order dated 27th August 2008 passed by the Education Officer (Primary) whereby the Education Officer refused to grant approval, the said grievance has not been accepted by this Court and notice was issued vide order dated 24th November 2008 to the respondents only to the extent of payment of unpaid salary as required to be paid by respondents no. 2 and 3. 2 3. Respondents no. 2 and 3 though served, none appears for them. In the circumstances, we dispose of the present writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to make representation to respondents no. 2 and 3 for payment of unpaid salary for the period during which she has discharged her duties as Peon in the concerned school within a period of fifteen days from today. If the petitioner submits her representation within fifteen days from today, we direct respondents no. 2 and 3 to take a decision thereon in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order. It is well settled that it is the primary responsibility of the management to pay salary of its employee for the work factually discharged by such employee. Judge. Judge. hsj