IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.7430 of 2005 Between: 1 d. Venkatarao, S/o. Sri D.V.N. Apparao, Allipalli-Village, ( Akinepalli), Dammapeta Mandal, Khammam District. 2 D. Subbarao, S/o. Sri D.V.N. Apparao, Allipalli-Village, ( Akinepalli), Dammapeta Mandal, Khammam District. 3 D. Krishnarao, S/o. Sri D.V.N. Apparao, Allipalli-Village, ( Akinepalli), Dammapeta Mandal, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S. Dammapet, Khammam District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Dammapet - village & Mandal, Khammam District. 3 Pagi Venkateswarlu, S/o. Veerappa, R/o. Kandrikagudem-village, Chintalapudi Mandal, W.G.District. 4 Pagi Laxmanrao, S/o. Jangam, R/o. Kandrikagudem-village, Chintalapudi Mandal, W.G.District. 5 Pagi Rajarao, S/o. Jangam, R/o. Kandrikagudem-village, Chintalapudi Mandal, W.G.District. 6 Kasina Korrajulu, S/o. Chennarao, R/o. Kandrikagudem-village, Chintalapudi Mandal, W.G.District. 7 Kasina, Venkateswararao, S/o. Chennarao, R/o. Kandrikagudem-village, Chintalapudi Mandal, W.G.District. 8 Soyala Mangaraju, S/o. Venkanna, R/o. Kandrikagudem-village, Chintalapudi Mandal, W.G.District. 9 Kanubolu Laxmanarao, S/o. Pitchaiah, R/o. Kandrikagudem-village, Chintalapudi Mandal, W.G.District. 10 Pandla Bhupathi, S/o. Venkanna, R/o. Kandrikagudem-village, Chintalapudi Mandal, W.G.District. 11 Sangha Jagannadham, S/o. Pothuraju, R/o. Kandrikagudem-village, Chintalapudi Mandal, W.G.District. 12 Siddina ramulu, S/o. Venkatappayya, R/o. Kandrikagudem-village, Chintalapudi Mandal, W.G.District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to Issue an order, direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus deeclaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not providing the necessary protection and help to the petitioners lives and properties, is illegal, arbitrary and consequently to declare that the petitioners are entitled for protection and help from Respondents 1 and 2 for the purpose of protection of crops from the respondents 3 to 12, and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.CH.NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.7430 of 2005 ORDER: None appears. No counter is filed. Petitioners seek to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct respondents 1 and 2 to provide necessary protection and help to their properties, pursuant to their representations, dated 29-03-2005 and 15-04-2005. This court while admitting the writ petition on 25-04-2005, directed respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representations made by the petitioners on 29-03-2005 and 15-04-2005 within four weeks from the date of receipt of the said order. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the interim order, dated 25-04-2005. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 24-04-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JGK}