-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.5704 of 2007 Shri Baban Dagadu Baravkar and another ..Petitioners vs. 1.Shri Sanjay Govind Deodhar and others ..Respondents Shri V.G.Peshave for petitioners. Shri S.A.Sawant for respondent no.1 Shri R.S.Apte i/b Shri S.A.Joshi for respondent no.3. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. 22nd January, 2008 22nd January, 2008 22nd January, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The order under challenge is passed during the pendency of the revision application under sec.76 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The Revision Application is admittedly pending. 2. Now, it must be heard by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal. In such circumstances, there is no reason to interfere. If the orer of S.D.O. has been in deed acted upon as urged by the petitioners, nothing prevents them from demonstrating and proving that aspect before the Revisional Authority and it is for the Revisional Authority to pass such orders as are -2- permissible inlaw. If the revision application is not heard, then, it is also open for the petitioners to approach for modification of the interim order. All pleas in that behalf of the parties to this petition are kept open. Petition is disposed of. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)