'-HC—78 'T^T ^ww^, ^>Ti1-M4t<o, f«ldl-y*j,< WTFIT WRW""""""""""""""""""""""""""^^ 200 3TI^?T TI^F (^crf3^^) W^T'^T'f^W- ^IT W^T sh^ich ^cTTW^ft^^Tt^ ^j^F^^li ^w^ff ^ 'fe^t <F3i^j< ^)>3tfiTH3^^[ WPf^NO. 494 OF 2009 PetitlonCT y |Li Dhaaraj l^ihare, S/o Shri Sukhlal Lihare, aged about 6^ years, Retired Assistaat Teacher, Goveram^nt Higher Secondaiy School, Musra Distdct F^ajnaadgaon (CG) rsus Respondents 1. 2. State of <phhattisgarh, Through fhe Secretary, Education| Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Joint Direjctor, Treasury, Account & Pension, Raipur, Di^itarict Raipur (CG) 3. Distdct E^ucation Ofl&cer, Rajnandgaon, Distict Rajnandg^ 4, Principal, Musra, Di^ Writ oetition under Articlel S.B_ Hon»ble8hriDhirendra M 27.1.2009 Mr. K.S. Pawar, learaed co) Ms. SunitaJaia, leamed P| The petitioner beiag aggrj on (CG) Goveniinent H^her Secondaiy School ^tarict Rajnaadgaon (CG) 226 ofthe Constitutiou oflndia lshra»J insel for fhe petitioner. L for fhe State. [eved by fhe order of Annexure P/2 dated 31,10.2008, whereby a s^m of Rs.41,082/- has beea proposed to be recovered from his rcti3|al dues, has filed fhis petition for quashing offhe order ofAnnexuxje P/2, Learaed counsel for fhe j)etitioner subnuts fhat tiie petitioner has retired as Assistaat Teacherlon 31.10,2008 and on fhe same date, f. XI-HC—78 ^^^ ^4^ WT 3^1^T ^^I<^ 4 ^/ ^ '3^T ^ww^, ^T\\W\<O, Y^v\W{^, *11*ICTICT»*1|Ch """" ""^T^200 3n^rTra^' (yif^^) i^nw^iT^i?r vide order of Annexure P/2, The impugned rccovexy order | show cause notice or wifhout c< He fiArfher submits fhat| stage, however, he niay be order ofAnnexureP/2 beforc Pension, Raipur/rcspondent N| io. fhis petition. On such No. 2 may be furfher dirccted| period, Ms. Sunita Jaia, leaniedj m case the petitioner files gdevao-ces along with copy of same shaU be considered aa(jl period ofsixweeks froia the In view of above fhe iiistant petitiou is dispose^ firesh representation along respondent No.2 for redressalj On such representation being decided on its own merits id period ofsixweeks fi^om fhe tpie above recoveiy has been proposed. [has been passed wifhout issuaace of mducting enquiry. |he is not pressmg fhis petition at fhis to file representation against the fhe Jomt Director, Treasuiy, Accoiint & |o.2 for redrcssal ofhis gnevaaces raised being made, fhe respondent to decide fhe same within a specified pe4mtted repxjeseatation d4te submislsions ^iih ferit^ T?p:^f ^* 'fe^t' <F»i^« ^3tRF?3Tr^r fi^sh |PL appearmg for the State submits that rcpresentation for redressal of his ^his petition before respondent No,2, the decided by respondent No,2 wifhia a of receipt of fhe reprcsentation, of leamed counsel for fhe parties, ofwith Hberty to fhe petitioner to file a copy of fhis petition before fhe |of his grievaaces raised ia fhis petition, |aiade, the same shall be considercd and accordaace with law wifhia a fiirfher ofreceipt offhe representation. dAte Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge