THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI C.M.A.M.P.No. 241 of 2010 AND C.M.A.No. 757 of 2009 J U D G M E N T: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V.Ramana) This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed by the appellants against the order dated 22.09.2008 in I.A.No. 3115 of 2007 in O.S. No. 1049 of 2007, on the file of the Court of the I Additional District Judge, Mahabubnagar. The appellants herein filed O.S.No. 4 of 2008 against the respondents seeking a direction to execute a registered sale deed in their favour in respect of the suit schedule property. They also filed the present Application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 C.P.C. to grant ad-interim injunction against the respondents and their men from alienating the petition schedule property in any manner, on the ground that they have entered into an agreement of sale with the respondents by paying huge considerations. On the other hand, the 1st respondent herein filed I.A.No. 560 of 2008 seeking to vacate the ex parte ad-interim injunction order, dated 26.12.2007. The learned Additional District Judge, through the order under appeal, dismissed the application filed by the appellants and vacated the ex parte injunction order. Therefore, the appellants have preferred this Appeal. This Court, while ordering notice to the respondent in the condone delay petition in C.M.A.M.P.No.513 of 2009 on 30.03.2009, granted interim injunction restraining the respondents from alienating the suit schedule property in C.M.A.M.P.No.589 of 2009. Now, the respondents filed C.M.A.M.P. No. 241 of 2010, to vacate the said interim order. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties at length and at their request, the main appeal itself is taken up for disposal. From a perusal of the order under appeal, it is evident that the learned Judge, after elaborately discussing the material available on record, found that the petitioners have not made out any prima facie case by establishing their possession over the suit schedule property and accordingly vacated the ex parte interim order dated 26.12.2007. Be that as it may, since the suit for specific performance of agreement of sale is pending consideration, and this Court has passed an order of interim injunction, restraining the respondents from alienating the suit schedule property, we deem it appropriate to direct the trial Court to dispose of the suit within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and till such time, the order of injunction granted by this Court on 30.03.2009 shall continue. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is accordingly disposed of. No costs. --------------------- (N.V. RAMANA, J) --------------------------- (NOUSHAD ALI,J) 25th February 2010 ksld