IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 56 of 2009 Shaukat. …..…Revision. Versus State of Uttarakhand and another. …….Respondent. Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Mr. R.K.S. Verma, learned counsel for the revisionist. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, learned AGA for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent no. 1. By way of present revision order dated 22.01.2009 passed by District and Sessions Judge, Haridwar is put under challenge. The main limb of the argument is that no revision is maintainable against the preliminary order passed under section 145 (1) and 146 (1) of Cr.P.C. hence, revision is wrongly admitted. Revision is still pending in the court of Sessions Judge, Hardwar, hence, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I dismiss the revision with the observation that question of maintainability shall be considered by the learned Sessions Judge at time of final hearing of the revision. Learned Sessions Judge shall not be prejudiced by any observation made by him while admitting the revision. He is also directed to record clear finding on the maintainability of revision. Present revision stands disposed of. (Alok Singh, J.) 25.11.2009