IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5986 of 2010 BABITA DEVI W/o Shri Shyam Sahu R/o vill. Bih Nagar, P.O. Biraul, P./s. Pandaul, Dist-Madhubani. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Commissioner Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 3. The District Magistrate, Madhubani. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer Sadar, Madhubani. 5. The Child Development Project Officer, Pandaul, Madhubani. ----------- 2 08.12.2010 From Annexures 3 & 4, it appears that both the authorities found the selection of one Manju Devi as Angan Bari Sevika, for Centre No. 61 as wrong, therefore, her engagement was cancelled. Thereafter, directions have been issued to make demarcation of the beneficiary area for the centre and take steps for fresh selection of Angan Bari Sevika. The claim of the petitioner is that since she was second in the panel from which the said Manju Devi, was selected, in the event of cancellation of her appointment, the petitioner should have been appointed. This Court finds that a direction has been issued for demarcation of the beneficiary area of the Centre. In the circumstances, in the opinion of this Court, it will not be appropriate to issue any direction for appointment of the petitioner from old panel. Petitioner 2 will be at liberty to participate in the fresh selection process if she so desires. This writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. Prakash ( J.N. Singh, J.)