^ QD &"{ HI6H COURT OF CHHATrES6ARH AT 6ILASPUR Writ Petition (5} No. 3123 of 2008 Petitioner b- N. Siraant, Aged 47 yeor^, S/o Late 5om Nath Srtdant, workmg as Lecturer in Civif Biwich in 6wt. Potytechnic Coltege &urg, &/o. MI6 681, Padmanabhpur, Oisn. Durg, Parasbod, Post Borinbcughera, TahsM A bistt-. &ajnandgaon, (C.6.) Versus fta^iondents 1. State of ^ihanisgarh. Thr. 5ecreftry ©ovemraentof Tedmical Educatian, Jan^hakti Niyojctti, Raipur (C.6.) 2. Director. Technica! educatwn. Raipur. C.G. 3. Dr. ft. 0. 6upta, Head of Department (MOM) Aftodern Office Manay&mwit, 6ovt. Polytachnic Coitege. birg. WRTT PETTTOIN UNbER ARTICLE 226 OF THE coNSTrrunoN OF INDIA Single Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri. J. ^iri P. 5- Koshy, Advowte for the petjtioner. Shri yo^iwsnt 5in9h T1fiokur, beputy Advocota Ssnsnsl for tk& rsqsiondents No.l ond 2- ORAL Oft&ER (Posssc! on this 23rd <ih/ of June, 2008) 1. With the consent of the pyties the mattBr is tokesn up for hffiiring. 2. Leam&d counset appMMr^ for th& pfttitiwier submitss thot it te unuAMil that daspite havin9 not been <pialified for the post of Principat, Potytechnic Co^Qe., -t+ie petitioner has b&en tnm^f&rrBd to ^ovt. Polytechnic Cotlege, Kabircftiam, as Principat vicl& ordfitr dated 3.6.20Q& (Ann. P/l). The second conterttion of -ttie petitioner iS that he is a teocher in Civij Enginearing and the (^titioner hos 6. Thd^ur .)T been postsd to a pface wh&re there. is no branch of Civil EngineBring* T do not und&rstand the contention of teomed counfiel (^ tte petition&r, who is a Lecturer in 6oyt- Polytechnic C'oll&^, burg hcs^ been given the higher assigriipent, tlwt too of 'rtie Principfil l-tow can the p&titbn&r deny 1+ie po^t on acccHjnt of fascfe of qualificatbn ? Per contro, 5hri YashwKint Sin9h Thakur, tefimed beput/ Adwcate QenBrat appearing for 'rti& State submits that +he p&ti'tion&r has rsot been transferred agGsn^t +he post of Profe^sor/Lecturar but on the po5t of Princtpal;which te of hsgh&r r&^cOTSibility ond th&r^ $s no reoson to QJI&ge ony nuifafide or oth&rwise. If the p&titbner iS not witling to accqst th& office. of the Principcl, tha p&titioner can not be foroed to accept the <sam&. In the tight of the above, the re^ondents/QU'thorities ara dir&cted to consider for posting th& pati+ioner ot wi cypropNa-hs place, as eorty as possible, pref&rQbty within a period of two weeks- However, for ihe period of two weeks no cofircive ^teps ^halt be taken. With th& above direction/ thte petition i^ dispo^ed of/ No orcfer asto costs. —— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge