IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-33267 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: November 12, 2010 Ved Parkash …..Petitioner versus State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.D.D. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) This is a petition seeking pre-arrest bail in a case registered against the petitioner under sections 376,292,506 IPC vide FIR No.384 dated 31.8.2010 at police station City Fatehabad. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that there is delay in lodging the FIR, the version given by the complainant in the FIR is unbelievable and thus, the petitioner is entitled to concession of pre-arrest bail. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The FIR was lodged by one Bhawna, who stated that the petitioner took her photographs through ventilator by using a mobile phone and later pressurized her by showing those photographs. He thereafter raped the complainant. He also threatened that if anything was disclosed to anybody, she would be killed. She later disclosed the entire incident to her husband resulting in the instant FIR. It appears that the matter was investigated by DSP, Tohana on Crl.Misc.No.M-33267 of 2010 - 2 - the directions of I.G., Hisar and certain conclusions were arrived at. Under the circumstances, I do not consider it a fit case for grant of concession of pre-arrest bail, as custodial interrogation of the petitioner may be required for recovering the photographs, etc. Dismissed. November 12, 2010 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE