IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM SATURDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2011 / 29TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 11319 of 2011(L) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. MARY XAVIER, W/O.XAVIER, PULIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VMRRA NO.79, MARKET ROAD, VADUTHALA, COCHIN-682 023. 2. XAVIER. P.C., PULIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VMRRA NO.79, MARKET ROAD, VADUTHALA, COCHIN-682 023. BY ADV. SRI.T.C.MOHANDAS, SRI.T.M.SUNIL, SMT.S.CHITHRA. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KASBA POLICE STATION, CHITTUR ROAD, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682 018. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KASBA POLICE STATION, CHITTUR ROAD, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682 018. 3. ANTONY, S/O.XAVIER, PULIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VMRRA NO.79, MARKET ROAD, VADUTHALA, COCHIN-682 023. 4. MINI, W/O.ANTONY, PULIPARAMBIL HOUSE, VMRRA NO.79, MARKET ROAD, VADUTHALA, COCHIN-682 023. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.T.K. VIPINDAS. R3 & R4 BY ADV. SRI.G.ANANTHANARAYANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 11319 of 2011(L) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION TO HIGH COURT DATED 01/01/2011. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 07/01/2011 OF KELSA (KERALA STATE LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY). EXT.P3: COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 21/01/2011. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21/01/2011. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT TO R1 & R2 DATED 05/04/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.11319 of 2011 ------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of August, 2011. J U D G M E N T C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. It is noticed that through the interim order passed by this Court on 7.4.2011, respondents 1 and 2 were directed to afford protection to the life and person the petitioners against any act on the part of respondents 3 and 4 to the extent of compelling the petitioner to execute any documents. It is further noticed that respondents 3 and 4 have not filed any counter affidavit in this writ petition. We are sure that the interim order has granted redressal to the grievance voiced. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of making the interim order issued by this Court on 7.4.2011, absolute. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE ami/