[-1-] FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPL.NO.394 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPL.NO.394 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPL.NO.394 OF 2007 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, office Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.A.B.Sabnis with M/s.D.H.Law Associates for Applicants Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, A.P.P. for State Respondent no.2 is present in person CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM:SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE :FEBRUARY 23, 2007 DATE :FEBRUARY 23, 2007 DATE :FEBRUARY 23, 2007 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants-original accused, the complainant-respondent no.2 Mr.Maseehul Haque who is present in person and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking quashing of Criminal Complaint No.678/SS/2006 which is pending before the learned Addl.Metropolitan Magistrate, 6th Court Mazgaon, Mumbai. The said case is under [-2-] Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. 3. While this matter was pending before this Court, the applicants and respondent no.2 have arrived at the settlement and the respondent no.2 agreed to accept Rs.42,000/- by way of full and final settlement of his dues. Today, the applicants have got two Demand Drafts drawn on Dena Bank, Varsova Branch, Mumbai, one Demand Draft is in the amount of Rs.30,000/- bearing No.680575 dated 2.1.2007 and another is in the amount of Rs.12,000/- bearing No.680772 dated 17.2.2007. The said Demand Drafts are handed over to the respondent no.2-original complainant in the Court. Respondent No.2 states that in view of the fact that he has received two Demand Drafts in full and final settlement of his dues, he does not wish to pursue his complaint. In view of the above, [-3-] the Criminal Complaint bearing No.678/SS/2006 which is pending before the learned Addl.Metropolitan Magistrate, 6th Court Mazgaon, Mumbai, is quashed. 4. Application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]