1 SBCivil Writ Petition No.5024/2010 Shankar Lal & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 11th August, 2010 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. PP Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr. AK Sharma] Dr. PS Bhati ] for the respondents. Mr. RL Jangid, Additional Advocate General. .... To challenge the notification dated 23.6.2008 issued by the Principal Secretary to the Government of Rajasthan, Department of Industries (Group-I) exercising powers as per Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 1894”) and the notification dated 20.11.2007 issued as per provisions of Section 4 of the Act of 1894 this petition for writ is preferred. It is the position admitted that before filing this petition for writ the land acquisition officer has already declared an award copy whereof is also available on record as Anx.15. It is also pointed out that all the petitioner except petitioner Lachhiram son of Partha have accepted the compensation and solitium in pursuant to the award aforesaid. Not only this, some of the petitioners preferred 2 references before the District Judge and as a consequent to arrival of some mutual agreement with private respondents they have withdrawn their applications. Some of the petitioners including petitioners Shankar Lal son of Narayan, Chaturbhuj son of Narayan, Ghisi Bai D/o Narayan, Nanda son of Bheru, Banshi son of Bheru, Bheru son of Khemraj, Gattu D/o Khemraj, Kamli D/o Khemraj and Benki D/o Khemraj have arrived at an agreement with the private respondent and they have accepted the compensation. In view of the factual position aforesaid I am not inclined to interfere with the matter while exercising powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the petition for writ is dismissed. ( GOVIND MATHUR ),J. kkm/ps.