IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.59 of 2006 RESHMA DEVI wife of Late Sundar Paswan, resident of village- simri, PS- Bisfi, District Madhubani Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Collector Madhubani 2. The Subdivisional Officer, Block Bisffi, District Madhubani 3. The Block Development Officer, Block Bisffi, District Madhubani 4. Polat Paswan, son of Late Ram Saran Paswan, resident of village, Bisffi, PS Bisffi, Block Benipatti, District Madhubani. ----------- 11 28-01-2009 Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for private respondent no.4. It is not possible to accept the claim of the appellant that after the death of her husband her nephew, respondent no.4, was appointed on compassion and, therefore, he is to meet all reasonable demands of the appellant for sustenance. We find no reason to interfere with the order of the writ court. However, it is clarified that since appellant had, under the earlier system, recommended favourably for appointment of her nephew, respondent no.4, and the said appointment was made in favour of respondent no.4 on certain conditions imposed by the Collector, the order of the writ court shall not be construed in any way to interfere with the condition imposed by the Collector. The appeal is dismissed with the aforesaid observation. BKS/ (Shiva Kirti Singh,J.) (J. N. Singh, J.)