Crl. Misc. No. M-25534 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-25534 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.9.2011 Neeraj ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharath Sarup, Dy. Advocate General, Haryana. Rajan Gupta, J (oral). This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to respondents No.2 & 3 to take action against private respondents on the basis of complaint preferred by the petitioner. Mr. Siddharath Sarup, learned Dy. Advocate General, Haryana seeks to place on record reply on behalf of the State. The prayer is accepted. Reply is taken on record. While referring to reply, he submits that regarding allegations levelled in the representation, Annexure P-1, the petitioner has already preferred a complaint before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sirsa. According to him, the case is now fixed for evidence of the complainant before the competent court today i.e. 13th September, 2011. According to learned counsel, since the trial court is already seized of the matter, the petitioner is not entitled to invoke the inherent jurisdiction of this court. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to Crl. Misc. No. M-25534 of 2011 2 dispute the averments aforesaid. Under the circumstances, it appears that no interference of this court in its inherent jurisdiction is called for. Dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 13.9.2011 'rajpal'