IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17061 of 2009 LALITESHWAR PRASAD, S/O LATE SUKAR MAHTO,R/O VILL.- MANIA CHAK, P.S.- ROH, DISTT.- NAWADA --- Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE COLLECTOR, NAWADA. 4. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, NAWADA. 5. DEPUTY DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, NAWADA. 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, WARSALIGANJ. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 9.12.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of provident fund dues. Learned counsel for the State submits that on perusal of Annexure A, it would appear that the dues on account of provident fund have already been sanctioned. It is further submitted that the dues on account of provident fund has also been paid as would be appearing from the challan, as contained in Annexure B. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the petitioner has not received the payment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may, however, be given liberty to make a representation in case the aforesaid amount is not received and may also claim for interest. In the above circumstances, for the aforesaid grievances, if any, the petitioner will be at liberty to make representation before respondent no.3-the Collector, Nawada. In case such a representation is filed within a period of six weeks, respondent 2 no.3 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)