IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 201 of 2009 (M/S) Mr. Niyaz Ahmad .......... Petitioner Versus Abdul Sattar and others ........... Respondents .............. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. This is absolutely a frivolous and misconceived petition for two reasons; firstly, because the permission to amend the election petition is wholly unassailable and secondly, because the petitioner cannot be said or considered to be a person in any manner aggrieved by the amendment impugned in the petition. The petition is dismissed. (V. K. Gupta, C. J.) 09.03.2009 A