IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 22ND FEBRUARY 2008 / 3RD PHALGUNA 1929 W.P.(C).No. 5345 of 2008(J) --------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- RAJI B., W/O. MADHAVAN NAIR, DIVYA NIVAS, EVANNUR, CHEROOR POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.BHASKARAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. 3. COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THRISSUR. 4. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, THRISSUR. 5. TALUK SURVEYOR, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP, SC,COCHIN D.B THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 5345 OF 2008 J ==================== Dated this the 22ndday of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner contends that Ext.P5 shows that the survey has been conducted without notice to him and in violation of Rule 48 and 50 of the Rules framed under the Surveys and Boundaries Act. According to the petitioner, against Ext.P5, he has filed appeal before the 2nd respondent and that appeal is pending. In this writ petition what is sought for is a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4. 2. If Ext.P4 has been received and is pending, the 2nd respondent will consider and pass orders thereon. Orders on Ext.P4 shall be passed as expeditiously as possible at any rate within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 3. Until orders are passed, status quo as on date shall be maintained. Needless to say that before final orders are passed, the petitioner and also the 3rd respondent shall be given notice. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp