HlGIiCOURT QP CHHATnSGARH.BILASPUR. Writ Petitipu ^ No. 44S9/20Q7 RESPONDENT Sint. Ramadevi Sharma, the President Priyadarshini Malula Prathmik Sahkari Upbhokta Bhandar, w/o Babulal Sharma, aged about 58 years, r/o Ward No.2, Kosa _Ni^ar, Bhilai, Tahsil & District Durg (C.G) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, tfarough fhe Secretary, Departiaent of Food, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G). 2. The CoUector, Food Braach, fhe CoUectorate, Durg (C.G) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, counsel for the petitioner Shri Ajit Siagh, Govt. Advocate for fhe State/ respondents ori advaace copy. ORAL ORDER 102.08.2007) SUNILKUMAR SINHA. J, Heard on admission. Leamed counsel for the petitioaer subiuits fhat the petitioner is fhe Presideat of Priyadarshird Mahila PrathTnik Sahfcciri Upbhokta Bhandw, whicb runs a Fau- Price Shop ia Ward No.2, Kosaaagar. His submission is that eartier 1025 card holders were consumers of the aforesaid Society, but now 197 consuiners have been removed and fhey have been declared ftie consuiiiers of some different shop. Therefore, now ffae petitioner is only having 828 consuiners. He draws iny attention to clause 8 of the order notified by C.G. Khadya, N^rik Apurti Evara Upbhokta Samrakshau Vibhag, Raipur vide Annexure P-3 dt.23.12.2004. He submits that this petition has been ffled for issuaace of writ for quashing of order dated 7.6.2007 (Annexure P-1) reducing the nuiaber of (C) Wtit Petitionfl»No.44S9/2007 consumers Irom. the petitioner's Society, alongwith other reliefs. I bave gone fhrough fhe Scheiue. In lay opinion, tbe pettdoner should firstly bring fhis fact to the notice of the concemed aufhority caUuig fheir attention towards Clause 8 of fhe aforesaid order of 2004 aad also raising her grievauce after afFectuig reduction froin her shop. In this vie\v of the niatter, for fhe tune beiag, the petition is disposed ofwith a direction fhat the petitioner, ifso advised, m.ay ffle an appropriate appUcation before fhe Conceraed aufhority luaking inention of Clause 8 of the aforesaid Order 2004. If such au application is filed the concemed auttiority shaU dispose of the saane in accordaace wifh law. Witb. the above direction/observation, this petition stands finally disposed of at ftie Biotion stage. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge