'5 Sngle Bencl* BEFQRE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITION (C)NO. / 2011 PETITIONER Vijay Dadriwal, S/o. Shri Chand, L '^ Aged about 48 years, R/o. 6c^..<rr"C"'T>'>^ys').. Patthalgoan, Lailunga, District, ^^..^^ty:^...i--f ^ Ra'Sarh (C.G.). ^^^..--n^^)^ ,.A»l a^ RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Cottector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA 'v PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH CQURT QECHHAmSGARj-!: B.ILA_SPU_R WRIT PETITION (0 N0. 7165 OF 2011 Vijay Dadriwal Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others m (Writ Petition under ArtiGle 226 of the Constitution oflndia) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Dy. Advocate General forthe State with Shri Arun Sao, Governmenf Advocate for the State. Shri C.P. Shrivastava, Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District Raigarh, is also present. ORDER (Passed on this 01s day of December, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. At the very outset Shri Murthy, learned Dy. Advocate General appearing with Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate, on instructions by the Chfef Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, who is present in the Court, submits that the impugned notice of demolition dated 25.11.2011, which without affording an opportunity of hearing, was issued for demolition of the alleged unauthorized construction, has been withdrawn by subsequent notice dated 26.11.2011. Acopyofthe said notice is taken on record. 3. In view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing sufvives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, the Nagar Panchayat will not take any action without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the person concerned. The Nagar Panchayat may also decide the question of authorized or unauthorized structure, as the same is in dispute, before passing the order, after considering the Gases sf the persons concerned. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge astiok