IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.56495 of 2007 1.SHANKAR PASWAN 2.Mahesh Paswan 3.Parmanand Paswan-------------------------petitioners Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Kumari Amar Kiran @ Babita Kumari-------opp.parties ----------- 3. 25.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, State and the opposite party. The petitioners who are husband and his family members apprehend arrest in a complaint case under Sections 498A, 307/34 and other provisions of the Penal Code and Sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel submits that there are no allegations of injuries of nature to invoke Section 307 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 fairly acknowledges that after the marriage she has secured employment as Angan Bari Sevika and is economic independent as of date. The economic independence of the informant not depending on the petitioner no.1 at this stage persuades this Court in absence of heinous allegation to grant them privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners surrender in the court 2 below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of rupees ten thousand each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in connection with Complaint case no. 1943/06. Let trial be expedited and concluded preferably within a maximum period of ten months. (Navin Sinha,J.) spal/