1 caw1720.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1720 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9609 OF 2010 Shri Chandrakant Krishna Tendulkar ....Applicant. Vs. Shri Vinod Anandji & ors. ....Respondents Mr. Shiva Patil, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Khan Javed Akhtar, Advocate for Respondent No. 3. CORAM:- GIRISH GODBOLE, J DATED:- AUGUST 17, 2011 P.C. 1. This Application seeks setting aside of the order passed by the Registrar Judicial dated 17/2/2011 dismissing the Writ Petition on account of failure of the Petitioner’s Advocate to take steps and for want of prosecution. 2. Since the respondents were yet to be served when the said order was passed, accepting the reasons indicated in paragraphs 3 to 7, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) and the Writ 2 caw1720.11 Petition is restored. 3. At this stage, advocate Mr. Khan Javed Akhtar appears for the Respondent No. 3 and states that the Respondent No. 3 is the contesting Respondent and was original Defendant No. 3 and would file vakalatnama. Mr. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner is directed to pay bhatta charges for the remaining Respondents and also send fresh advocate’s notice returnable after three weeks. (GIRISH GODBOLE, J)