IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2716 OF 2010 Between : A.Ramanjineyulu and others .... PETITIONERS A N D Ennoble India Chits Ltd., and another …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2716 OF 2010 O R D E R: This Civil Revision Petition, under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘C.P.C.’) is directed against the order, dated 09.06.2010, in E.P.No.191 of 2009 in O.S.No.221 of 2007 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur, whereunder and whereby, the application, filed under Order XXI Rule 48 C.P.C. to order attachment of the salary of judgment debtor Nos.1 to 5 for realization of the decretal amount, was allowed against the petitioner / judgments debtor Nos.1, 3 and 5 and the attachment of salary of judgment debtors 2 and 4 was dismissed. 2. Heard. 3. Original Suit No.221 of 2007 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ananthapur, was filed by the respondent No.1 herein, for recovery of the suit amount, and the same was decreed. Thereafter, respondent No.1 filed Execution Petition, for attachment of salaries of the judgment debtors. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners herein are small employees of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and getting a meager income; that each of families of petitioners is depending upon the income of the respective petitioners and hence, he prays to set aside the impugned order. 5. The order passed by the Court below is not seriously challenged by the petitioners. The impugned order was passed under Order XXI Rule 48 C.P.C., for attachment of the salary of the judgment debtors. Under the said Rule, where the property to be attached is the salary, the Court may order that the amount shall, subject to the provisions of Section 60, be withheld from such salary either in one payment or by monthly installments as the Court may direct. The order impugned is not shown to be contrary to the said provision. The grounds raised in this petition are untenable. The suit was decreed against all the judgment debtors jointly and severally. Simply because, the judgment debtors are getting meager income, it cannot be a ground to set aside the impugned order. Therefore, the order passed by the Court below is within the scope and ambit of Order XXI Rule 48 C.P.C., and there are no grounds to interfere with the same. 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU, J NOVEMBER 29, 2010. YVL