CWP No.9021 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.9021 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.5.2010 Rajpal Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Jindal, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondents. Rajan Gupta, J. (oral) The petitioner has preferred this writ petition seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents to include his name in the voter list of Gram Panchayat Village Daroli Ahir, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mahendergarh, prepared for the ensuing Panchayat elections. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the name of the petitioner has been wrongly excluded from the voter-list despite the fact that he was a registered voter of Ateli Assembly Constituency. Reply has been filed on behalf of the State in court. The same is taken on record. Learned State counsel has referred to the same and submitted that the petitioner did not file his objections with regard to exclusion of his name from the voter list before the prescribed date i.e. 29th March, 2010. He has pointed out that the petitioner preferred CWP No.9021 of 2010 2 his claim only on 3rd May, 2010, vide Annexure P-5. He further submits that the petitioner was not a registered voter for 2009 of Narnaul Assembly Constituency. He submits that the petitioner cannot raise any dispute at this stage. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and given careful thought to the facts of the case. Admittedly, the petitioner did not move objections regarding exclusion of his name from the voter list within the prescribed period. His prayer for inclusion of his name at this stage is thus misconceived. Election process has been set into motion. This apart, there is factual issue involved in this case, which cannot be adjudicated in the writ jurisdiction of this court. Dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 20.5.2010 'rajpal'