: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3019 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3019 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3019 OF 2006 Jay Krishna Chandiprasad Kandiyal ...Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. Ms.Sharmila Kaushik, adv. appointed for the Applicant. Ms.S.V.Gajare, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 4th April, 2007. DATE : 4th April, 2007. DATE : 4th April, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Ms.Kaushik, advocate appointed for the applicant, and Ms.Gajare, APP for the State. Perused the report received from Superintendent, Thane District Central Jail. 2. This application was moved by the applicant through jail seeking direction to transfer 3 cases pending against him to Fast Track Court so that the cases could be disposed off early. As per the report in Sessions Case No.466 of 2005 arising out of crime no.37 of 2005 of Tardeo police station, he is already convicted for the offences punishable under Sections392 and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-. That case is disposed off by the Sessions Court. Sessions Case No.550 of 2005 is pending before the fast tract court, Sewree, Bombay and : 2 : it is at the stage of final arguments. Sessions Case No.436 of 2005 is also pending before the Sessions Court, Mumbai. Ms. Gajare, the learned APP makes a statement that case is actually before the fast track court. However, it is pending for decision on some application filed by the accused no.2. In view of the report, it is clear that out of 3 cases, one is already disposed off and 2 cases are pending before the fast track court and therefore, no further direction is necessary. 3. Application stands disposed off accordingly. (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.) (J.H.Bhatia,J.)