IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14958 of 2011 MITHILESH MAHTO S/O SHIVJEE MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.05.2011 The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 25.3.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 8613/2011 but has given liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It has been submitted that charges have been framed now and, therefore, he deserves to be released on bail. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Madhubani in connection with Arer P.S. Case No. 2/10, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailors shall be the brother of the petitioner namely Baijnath Mahto. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in 2 address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)