IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 5TH JULY 2011 / 14TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 18108 of 2011(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SRI.GOPALAN, S/O.GOPI, POONTHANATH HOUSE, KOWKAD, EDAKKARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. SMT.SUNITHA, W/O.GOPALAN, POONTHANATH HOUSE, KOWKAD, EDAKKARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G SRI.R.SUDHEESHKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676505. 3. THE CHAIRMAN, TALUK LAND BOARD, NILAMBUR-679329. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, NILAMBUR TALUK- 679329. GP SMT.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 18108 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBIT EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BEFORE THE TALUK LAND BOARD. (True Copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).18108/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 5th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.The grievance projected in the writ petition is that Ext.P1 application made under Section 85(5) or (7) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act by the petitioner to the third respondent is not considered so far. 2.Taking note of the pendency of Ext.P1 application, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1 in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 'three months' from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs