ladda IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7971 OF 2011. Bhagwanji Gidhra ....Petitioner Versus M/s Ace Links & ors ...Respondents Mr R.S. Apte, Sr. Counsel i/by Mandar Limaye for the petitioner. Ms Aparna Vhatkar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 28 September, 2011. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr Apte, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and Ms Vhatkar, learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. 2. The petitioner, by filing the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenges the order passed by respondent No.3 under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971. Said appeal of the petitioner is dismissed by respondent No.3 on 30.5.2011. However, respondent No.1 - Developer is directed to pay rent to the petitioner for the period of one year and the petitioner is directed to vacate his structure within the period of ten days. ladda 3. There is no dispute that the Additional Collector (SRA) held the petitioner is ineligible for getting permanent alternative accommodation vide order dated 4.6.2009. Against this order, the petitioner has preferred an appeal before the Slum Rehabilitation Authority. Said appeal is pending. In case, the petitioner succeeds in the said appeal and the Competent Authority held the petitioner eligible for permanent alternative accommodation, then the respondents are bound to provide the petitioner permanent alternative accommodation and consequential benefits. 4. Subject to above observations, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that all contentions on merits of the respective parties are expressly kept open to be agitated before SRA. (RANJIT MORE, J.)