ifl? fc v ^ <• IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BUASPUR WRTT PETn'ION N0. /2002 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 READ WITH ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PETITIONERS f- <••< ^••^^;wft-^-' .AVAI "' ^»( ^'[K!-"[ 6^ ..o RESPONDENTS 1) DR. R.K. VERMA, S/0. LATE R.K. VEKMA., AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, PRESIDENT CHHATTISGARH CHIKITSA ADHIKARI SANGH, RAJKISHORE V3KR, BIIASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) 2) DR. K.K. SAO, S/0. LAGE K.R. SAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, SECRETARY CHHATTISGARH, CHIKITSA ADHIKARI SANGH, RAIPUR, SEEPAT CHOWK BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) VERSUS 1) 2) THE CHIEF SECRETARY, STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH) THE STATE OF THROUGH THE GOVERNMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH CHHATTISGARH SECRETARY, CHHATTISGARH, AND FAMILY 3) WELFARE DEPARTMENT MANTRAIAYA, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH) THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES STATE OF CHHATTISGARH D.K.S BHAWAN, RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH) 'iifla) PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS: iS As given in the cause title. ^;.,^ , ^ •" I'f . .f^ \A'~ • ^!^ Sf^ A. xl-HC-22 's^ '-".WM^, -^wi\<s, ferray ..^^(Vo.^W^ SITc^TW 5=RTaT!S^T ^T!^"?lf^T 3Tlt?F?^nW°ft^ S:l!t:!itti:l'y Shri R.N. Jha with Mrs. H4inida Siddique, counsel for the petitioners. ^T'ITWfri Trp^' -3 fWt -ITSRZR ^73TPWT3WCT Shri Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, State/respondent No.2. Deputy Govt. Advocate for the Having heard leamed couns4, thc Court is not inclincd to entertain this writ petition as in its ({ipinion, the appropriate forum for the petitioner to approach is the State Administrative Tribunal. Admittedly, the petitioners arp Govemment servants and have approached this Court as office tjearers of Chhattisgarh Chikitsa Adhikari Sangh, Raipur, raising a gri'pvance about posting/non-postinj of medical officers to certain specified |3osts. In substance, the grievance of the petitioners relates to servic^ conditions. In support of their contention, a reference was made to ^nnexure P-7, which is a copy of the order passed by the M.P. High Cc^urt, as it is submitted in a similar { matter. However, the Court is not incBned to take that as a precedent for the purpose of entertaining this petitfon. wherein the subject matter of dispute is not within jurisdiction in •%ew of the provisions contained in Section 15 of the Administrative Tribu^ials Act, 1985, which fact was over looked in Annexure P -7. However, if so advised, the petitioners are free to approach the appropriate forum. | 1 Accordingly, the petition fails aijid is dismissed. Sd/- P. C. Naik Judge f l.-w^" /