IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH AUGUST 2010 / 14TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 21624 of 2010(C) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ T.D. YOHANNAN, S/O.DEVASSY, AGED 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT THONITHARA HOUSE, NEAR ST.DOMINIC CHURCH, VADAKKE ANGADI, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.PAVITHRAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF RATIONING, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.P. NARAYANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/08/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ---------------------- W.P.(C). No. 21624 of 2010 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 5th day of August, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is an authorised Retail Distributor conducting an authorised retail depot for the sale of ration articles in Aluva Taluk. His license was cancelled, against which the petitioner filed an appeal before the Director of Civil Supplies, which was dismissed by Ext.P2. Against Ext.P2, petitioner filed a revision before the Commissioner of Civil Supplies, which was rejected and returned stating that the revisional authority is the government. Petitioner filed this writ petition challenging Ext.P4 order of the Commissioner returning the revision on the ground that revision lies before the government. The petitioner now submits that he has filed Ext.P5 revision petition before the government and he now confines his relief for a direction to the Government to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 revision petition expeditiously. 2. I have heard learned Government Pleader also. 3. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three W.P.(C). No. 21624 / 2010 2 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgement after affording an opportunity to the petitioner. It would be open to the petitioner to move the 4th respondent for interim orders; which shall be considered and orders passed within two weeks from the date of receipt of the application for interim order. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE. ln