1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No. 186 OF 2007 (In W.P. 711/95) Vitthal Sitaram Chandurkar v. The Additional Collector, Buldana & anr. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's and Registrar's orders orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. N.R. Saboo Advocate for the appellant. Mrs. Rashmi Deshpande, AGP, for Res. no.1. Mr. P.S. Sadavarte Advocate for Res. no.2. ..... CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & A.B.CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED : 13 th OCTOBER, _2010. Admittedly the dispute between the landlord and tenant is the subject matter of the present letters patent appeal, which is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.2.2007 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 711 of 1995. This Court has already taken a view in the case of Kalpesh Hemantbhai Shah v. Manhar Auto Stores – LPA No. 150 of 2010 that Letters Patent Appeal in the matter of dispute between landlord and tenant would not be maintainable. In view of the above, we hold that the present letters patent appeal is not maintainable and 2 dismiss the present letters patent appeal. Interim orders passed in this appeal shall continue to operate for a further period of eight weeks. JUDGE JUDGE /TA/