IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-29632 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.12.2011 Lal Mohd. ..Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Ms. Jyoti Sareen, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for respondent No. 2. ***** ALOK SINGH, J.(ORAL) This Court vide order dated 4.8.2011 has directed the petitioner to surrender /appear before the trial Court in compliance of the summoning order under Section 319 Code of Criminal Procedure to face trial for an offence punishable under Section 376 IPC alongwith the other accused. It was further directed that if petitioner surrenders/appears before the trial Court, his bail application shall be considered within two days by the trial Court. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana on the instructions from Puran Lal, Assistant Sub Inspector as well as Mr. Rajesh Lamba, appearing for respondent No. 2 have stated that petitioner has failed to appear before the trial Court in pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 4.8.2011. Since the petitioner has not made compliance of the order passed CRM No. M-29632 of 2010 (O&M) -2- by this Court on 4.8.2011, he does not deserve any relief from this Court. Moreover, impugned order passed by the trial Court summoning the petitioner to face trial for offence punishable under Section 376 IPC as an additional accused seems to be justified on the facts of this case. No interference is required. Present petition is dismissed. (ALOK SINGH) December 12, 2011 JUDGE Poonam (II)