In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 5286 of 2007 Date of decision: May 22, 2009 Shyam Singh and others .. Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Dilbagh Singh, AAG, Haryana. A.N. Jindal, J Learned counsel for the petitioners stated that the petitioners have no cause of action against the respondents No.3 to 13 and if any order is passed detrimental to the rights of these respondents, then the same will remain inoperative qua them. In view of the aforesaid statement of Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate and the fact that the suit for permanent injunction has been filed only against the respondents No.1 and 2 and no relief has been claimed against the respondents No.3 to 13, therefore, the trial court has fell in error while impleading them as party. Resultantly, this petition is accepted and the impugned order is set aside. However, it is made clear that if the respondents have any right, interest or claim against the plaintiffs-petitioners, then they can have re- course to the remedy as provided under the law. May 22, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge