1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR First Appeal No. 993 of 2010 Smt. Ekta W/o Navin Patil and another VERSUS Navin Sukhram Patil - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. B. H. Sontakke, Advocate for the appellants Mr. J. M. Puranik, Advocate for the respondent CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A. B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATE : JULY 14, 2011. Heard Mr. B. H. Sontakke, the learned counsel for the appellants. Admit. Call for the record and proceedings. Mr. J. M. Puranik, the learned counsel waives notice of hearing on behalf of the sole respondent. Civil Application (CAF) No. 2488 of 2010 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the respondent has presented an additional affidavit of the respondent to the Court today. The same is accepted on the record. 2 In the said additional affidavit, it is stated by the respondent that he would not take any coercive steps for the execution of the decree in a petition for restitution of conjugal rights, passed in favour of the respondent/husband by the trial Court. In view of the statement made by the respondent in the additional affidavit dated 14/7/2011, the order granting ad-interim stay, dated 18/11/2010, is modified as there would be no question of granting stay to the decree passed by the trial Court in the petition filed by the husband for restitution of conjugal rights. The civil application is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale