IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 18TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 27TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 27464 of 2008(T) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- IRUKULANGARA MUHAMMED, S/O. ALASSAN KUTTY, KANNAMANGALAM AMSOM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN, ADV. SRI.S.SREEDEV. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, THIROORANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KANNAMANGALAM VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. CHOOLAN, S/O. NEELANDAN, KOTTADAN HOUSE, KANNAMANGALAM AMSOM DESOM, KANNAMANGALAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. VELAYUDHAN, S/O. PERAVAN, AGED 51 YEARS, KOTTADAN HOUSE, KANNAMANGALAM AMSOM DESOM, KANNAMANGALAM P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. AYYAPPAN, S/O. PERAVAN, DO DO. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. SUDHADEVI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/09/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. V. GIRI, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.27464 of 2008 ------------------------------- Dated this the 18th September, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner purchased 0.32 hectares of land in R.S.No.329/2 of Kannamangalam Amsom Desom in Tirurangadi Taluk, by document No.720/72. Apparently, he sold his share over the property inherited from his father, which lies contiguously and unseparated from the other properties belonging to the petitioner. Petitioner then filed a suit for partition as O.S.No.106 of 1983 before the Munsiff Court, Tirur, and the same was decreed. Ultimately, Plot-A1 in Ext.C1 plan appended to the decree is stated to have been delivered to the petitioner. It seems that appeals filed against the decree was also dismissed by the Lower Appellate Court and by this Court as well. 2. The present grievance of the petitioner seems to be stemming from a reluctance on the part of the competent authorities to respond to an application filed by the petitioner for W.P.(C) No.27464 of 2008 2 fixation of the boundaries, in relation to the properties separately enjoined by him. Exts.P3 and P4 applications in this regard are pending before the respondents 2 and 3. Only Ext.P4 application could be taken cognizance of at this stage, going by the order passed by the Division Bench on 16.9.2008. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to take note of Ext.P4 application and take further steps thereon, in terms of the provisions of Survey and Boundaries Act. If the help of a Surveyor is required, that shall also be requisitioned, at the expense of the petitioner. Needful shall be done within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. V. GIRI, JUDGE nj.