IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.30370 of 2011 Between: M/s. Neelam Jute Private Limited, Srikakulam District. … Petitioner And The Eastern Power Distribution Co., of A.P., Ltd., Visakhapatnam District & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri D.V. Nagarjuna Babu Counsel for the respondents: Smt. Jyothi Eswar Gogineni This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.30370 of 2011 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside order, dated 23.09.2011, of respondent No.2. By the impugned order, the petitioner is levied with a sum of Rs.2,96,108/- towards the purported back billing for the alleged non- segregation of lighting and fan loads. The main plea on which the Writ Petition is filed is that respondent No.2 has not considered the detailed objections filed by the petitioner and has passed a thoroughly non- speaking order. From the perusal of the impugned order, this Court is convinced that even though the petitioner has filed detailed objections to the show cause notice explaining its stand, except making a mention of the factum of filing the objections, respondent No.2 has not discussed and given any reasons for his disagreement for rejecting those objections. Therefore, the impugned order cannot be sustained and the same is set aside on this short ground alone. This order, however, does not prevent respondent No.2 from passing a fresh order, after considering the detailed objections of the petitioner and giving reasons in the event he seeks to reject the objections filed by the petitioner. The Writ Petition is accordingly allowed to the extent indicated above. As a sequel, WPMP.No.37619 of 2011 is disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 22.11.2011 ES