agk CAW2349-10 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2349 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4273 OF 2010 M/s.Raj Darshan Ventures .. Applicant versus The Joint Charity Commissioner, Maharashtra State, Mumbai & Ors .. Respondents Mr.R.Z.Moray i/by Mr.Amit Sale for the applicant. Mr.R.M.Patne, A.G.P for respondent No.1. Mr.G.S.Godbole i/by Mr.Vijay B. Dhingreja for respondent No.2. Mr.Nitin Thakker, Sr.Counsel a/w Mr.Satyen Vora i/by M/s.Markand Gandhi & Co for respondent No.3. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 7th September 2010. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant. The application is opposed by the learned senior counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent. He pointed out that when the petition appeared before the learned Vacation Judge, the petitioner was put to notice that conveyance has been already executed on the basis of the impugned order. agk CAW2349-10 (2) 2 I find that notice for final disposal was issued by this Court on 19th July 2010. By amendment, the petitioner wants to challenge the consequential act of execution of Sale Deed on the basis of the impugned order. 3 The learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submitted that the prayer sought to be added by way of amendment cannot be granted. 4 Suffice it to say that permission deserves to be granted to the applicant to carry out amendment. It is not necessary to go into the merits of the proposed amendment as the same will have to be considered at the time of final hearing of the petition. 5 Hence, application is allowed as prayed. Amendment to be carried out within two weeks. Reply, if any, to be filed to the amended petition by 30th September 2010. Writ petition shall be placed on board on 6th October 2010. It is obvious that all contentions of the respondents including the contention based on delay and latches will remain open at the time of final hearing of the petition. (A.S.OKA, J)