o ^V \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGAEtH BILASPUR /' W.P.NO. 2-°>C/2004 / Petitioner ..' '.•':",\*3-'' k'" < ^^^, ^•ss^ .^'^a^-^ y y- Versus ^l Yashwant Katakwar S/o Late Shri R.C.Kahra, aged about 21 years, R/o H.No.500 Near Vedic Convent School, New Sarkanda BangaUpara, Gali 30, Bilaspur- (C.G.) Respondents \^ ^' ./; ..^%y^ ^^L^ 1. State of CMiatti&garh through the Principal Secretary Department of GeneralAdministration Mantrataya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur-(C.G.) 2. The Secretary Department ofTrade & Industries; DKS Bhawan, 1 Mantrataya^ Raipur, Dist : Raipur- (C.G.) WRTT PETFnONUNDERARTICLE ^26/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INBIA SD^iqnfrlW fW sn^'1 a>HN> 75ET •HITITR^, •gxiteTR', fc<Cll'M1< wf ^-,29,0.1 3K^1'q^^(^^q) I^IIW ^lftn ail^t wqfepN-WRti ^ fs^i <r^^n ^3?fiCT 311^1 respondents appointinent on coinpassionate Shri Anand K Tiwari, cou4sel for fhe petitioner. Sbri RanbiT Singh, Govt. 4dv. for the State. The petitioner has prefen^d ttus petition uader Article 226 227 of fhe Coiistitution of Ifadia seeking direction Uiat the directed to consi|der fhe case of fhe petitioner tor rou.ad. The circUDistauccs undcr ^vhich tfac pctitioncr has forced to file tiie present petition are t(iat the petitioncr's father, who was workiug as Assistaat Maiia^r m fhe Depai'tment of Disnict Trade a&d Industrial Centre, piiaspur died iu hamess on 07.02.2002 aad he was the qay eaming ineinber in fhe faiiuly. ^('?l'~~^v- Tfae inofher of fhe petitioner is /o|d ladv aiid two brothcrs of ffac petitioner's are unemployed, th^refore, tlie petitioner applied before fhe respondent No.l on 0|5.03.2002 for appoiutment on coaipassionate ground aiid appU^ation. to fhat effect was filed as Annexiire P-1 but fhe same ha;fe not been considered bv the respoiidcnts. The pctition.cr is in^.triculate and is eligible for thc appointment on compassional Leanied counsel for fhe | petitioner subiaits tliat the petitioner inay be allowed to iuaJ(:e a detaUed representation to respondent No. 1 and respondent No. 1 be directed to consider fhc casc of fhc petitioncr for a^poititmeat OQ coinpassionato ground, to whicli learued State coi^nsel has no objection. Having heard fhe leamed |counsel for the parties and Iiavni£reeard to t'he fa^+c <irirl r-1Tfumotani:ca of Uifc uy.ye, tlic GRPRJ—FS/%-J; /200(.—50,000_ .^1 sn^r ^RI i^-fi* '?wi ^n^r sit*it<»> 'FSS 'tiwwf, •,3-^ww, hviwy. <-^J~~P A-c[6 ^mdT a»*ti<(» sn^i'q^? ('^3^si) TOIIW ^ifct sii^i 2- appojiitii|Lcnt petitioner is allowed to in; respondent No. 1 aloni consideration of ffac and in tum respondent No. 1 aiid circulars regarding fhe decide fhe I'epresentation witfii: date of receipt of the sanie in with the law. With ttie above directiorls Certified copy as per ral^s pse a detailed repiesentation to ^vith relevant docunients for on thc coinpassionatc grouitd |after considering tfae orders, rules |compassionate appouitauent shaU |tiin a period of 60 days froai fhe ^n objective inaoiier iii accordaace fhe petition staads disposed of. '<BW)i'l4-l 41'lfif <f^6 <1<«41< ^sTfiman^i Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge GRPRJ—FS/%— S/20CK—50,000.