09 19.9.2013 mp Heard learned counsel for the parties. This appeal by the appellant-Insurance Company, is directed against the judgment/award dated 24.10.2000, passed by the Learned Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation, Keonjhar, in W.C. Case No.40/98/14K/94, awarding an amount of Rs.41,596/- as compensation to be deposited within 30 days, failing which interest @ 6% per annum shall be payable from the date of accident, till realisation. Learned counsel for the appellant-Insurance Company submits that the Commissioner erred in holding that the injured claimant was a workman in the bus bearing no.ORJ-3727 when admittedly, the claimant in the claim application had mentioned that he was a workman in the bus bearing no.ORJ-3637. In this regard, it is submitted that as the police papers clearly revealed that the bus bearing no.ORJ-3637 was involved in the accident, the Commissioner should not have accepted the amendment sought for by the claimant with regard to the registration of the vehicle, which has subsequently been corrected as no.ORJ-3727. It is further submitted that as the initial claim application was against the wrong vehicle on the basis of the police papers, the Commissioner erred in allowing the claimant to correct and / or change the registration number of the vehicle in the claim application and pass the impugned award against the insurer of the said vehicle, incorporated by way of amendment. Misc. Appeal No.65 of 2001 Learned counsel for the claimant-respondent no.1 submits that on the basis of the police paper, the injured claimant had filed the claim application against the bus no.ORJ-3637. After the appearance of the owner of the bus (respondent no.2), he disclosed in his written statement that the registered number of the bus is no.ORJ-3727 and not no.ORJ-3637. Accordingly, the claimant sought for an amendment and / or correction of the registration number of the vehicle furnished in the claim application and filed certified copy of the Registration Certificate of both the vehicles to show that it was a bonafide mistake. Considering the documents filed, the Commissioner allowed the amendment with regard to the correction of the registration number of the bus, which was accordingly corrected as no.ORJ-3727. It is further submitted that there is no dispute that respondent no.2 is the registered owner of the said bus and the present appellant is the insurer. It is submitted that the owner of bus no.ORJ-3727 having filed written statement admitting the employment of the claimant as a helper in the said bus and had met with an accident on 23.4.1994, arising out of his employment, the plea now taken by the Insurance Company cannot be accepted. On a perusal of the impugned award, it is seen that the Commissioner has taken into consideration the evidence on record, both oral and documentary, including the admission of the owner in his written statement in coming to hold that the claimant was a workman in bus no.ORJ-3727 and sustained injury in an accident on 23.4.1994, arising 2 out of and in course of his employment. Considering the submissions made and keeping in view the findings of the Commissioner given in the impugned award and the reasons assigned in support of the same, no impropriety or illegality can be said to have been committed by the Commissioner so as to warrant any interference in this appeal. The appellant-Insurance Company having deposited the awarded amount in this Court, the award of default interest is set aside. The appeal being devoid of merit, the same is accordingly dismissed. As the entire awarded amount has already been deposited in the Registry of this Court, the Registry is directed to disburse the same along with accrued interest thereon to the claimant on proper identification. Misc. Appeal is accordingly dismissed. ………………….. S.C.PARIJA, J. 3