IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 34 OF 2008 SHRI. RAMA DATTU GAONKAR AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus SHRI. BHAURAO VITHAL GHAISAS (DECEASED) THROUGH LR'S ... Respondent Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. P. Lotlikar, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. V. P. Thali, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 24th October, 2008 P.C. Mr. Thali states that till the disposal of Second Appeal No.34 of 2008 construction ordered to be demolished will not be demolished. Mr. Lotlikar pointed out that that plaintiff not is in posssession of the paddy field portion in the suit property. This position has been disputed by Mr. Thali. The records prima facie disclose that the plaintiff has not been in possession of the paddy field portion. Therefore, stay of the impugned decree only to the extent of the paddy field portion in the suit property is concerned. Application stands disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. lh/.