P.R.NO- pieser.t ^^^1.1^: t.*"- ^•^ :^"]^"(:'US[ ( ^^- 2<^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S )No. ?"? 03 Of 2011 BETWEEN /\. Duberam Tandon S/o Late Shri Baliram Tandon, aged about 55 years, occupation- service, Lecturer, Govemment High School Katnal R/o Kotmi Sonar Via Akaltara , District Janjgir Champa (CG). 2. Kaleshwar Prasad Kaiwarth S/o Late Shri Kanita Prasad, aged about 63 years, occupation retired in the month of July 2009 on the post of Upper Division Teacher, Govemment Higher Secondary School Pondi Dalha, R/o Kotaii Sonar, District Janjgir Chan-ipa (CG). <''' PETITIONERS: AND 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, School Education Departnient, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The District Education Officer, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (CG). 3. The Block Education Officer, Akaltara, Distorict Janjgir Champa (CG). RESPONDENTS: C^y^. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •^IMI^^ 1- PARTICULARS OF THEPETITIONERS: <^^~ ~^^\ As stated in the cause title above. /<?7' ^^ •|SA.I^ik|<» ^\ (-l-^f. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: ,"^i*>-~- .^s, / As stated in the cause title Above. '</<(T»A'5k"^ -~ -—-—^- 1+i,- s^--' gaa •vsEy "vf . ^_ ""^: ^ 'v^sss& ^ ^N i^^^s^^s \^,f, ff.s^'iycie^ic''^'' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : B1LASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1303 OF 2011 PETITIONERS Duberam Tandon & Another RESPONOENTS Versus The State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of tndia) Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Surya Kant Mishra, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Sushi! Dubey, Government Advocate for th® State/respondents. QBDERJQRM,! (Passed on th's 10"' day of Mareh, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petftioners, on instruction, submits that the petitioners do not want to press Uiis petition on merit at this stage, and prays for withdrawal of this petition with libertv to maks a representetion in the iight of the cireutar dated 05/01/2011. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that if a representation is made, the same shatl be considered and decided within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, in the iight of above-stated cireutar. 4. In view of foregoing, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above-stated libertv. it is exDected that the concerned authorities wouid consider and decide the representation, if any, as above, within a oeriod of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a copy of this order. .--- .1- Sa !,b^ Arun