IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8516 of 2011 UPENDRA KUMAR YADAV @ UPENDRA KUMAR @ UPENDRA YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 05.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is named in the FIR and the informant claimed to have identified the petitioner and other 20 FIR named accused persons while they were going towards the house of the informant. The informant further claimed that the petitioner and other FIR named accused committed loot in his house and also blew his house by exploding bombs. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is Shikchha Mitra and except the informant, none of the persons, has named the petitioner in course of investigation. It is also pointed out by him that as per first information report itself, the alleged occurrence took place in the night of 18.05.2010 but the informant lodged the present case in the next morning and moreover, the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent which is evident from the report of police itself. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Upendra Kumar Yadav @ Upendra Kumar @ Upendra Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of 2 the like amount each in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 102 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati (Gaya). AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)