THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32328 of 2010 Dated 31.03.2011 Between: K.Srinivasa Rao …Petitioner And The Tahsildar, Pedaparupaudi Mandal, Krishna District …Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: None appeared Counsel for respondent: Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “….to issue any writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in deleting shop No.7 of Ealamarru Village, Pedaparupudi Mandal, Krishna District without issuing any notice, order is null and void and pass such other order or orders…” On 30.12.2010, the case was adjourned in view of absence of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Again on 23.02.2011, the case was adjourned for the same reason. Even today, when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing his cause in the writ petition. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.41067 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 31st March, 2011 GHN