IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.359 of 2008 ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 9.4.2009 The petitioner who is the informant of Agamkuan P.S. Case No.158/98 has filed this revision application against the Judgment dated 9.10.2007, passed in G.R.No.817/98, Tr.No.16/07 whereby the learned Magistrate has acquitted the O.P. for the charge under sections 323,341,342,427 and 504/34 of the I.P.C. Learned counsel submits that all the five prosecution witnesses consistently supported the case, whereas the defence did not examine any witness in their support. He further submits that the police was in league with the accused persons. In the instant case chargesheet was submitted under sections 323,341,342,427 and 504/34 of I.P.C. Charges were framed under the aforesaid section. The learned Magistrate has discussed the evidence of all the five witnesses and has come to the conclusion that the evidence are contradictory and not worth reliance. If in a case against acquittal, two views are possible then the view taken by the court should not be interfered with. Further more, there does not seem any ambiguity in the Judgment of the trial court. In the circumstance, there is no merit in this application. 2 The revision application is dismissed. Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)