IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18065 of 2009 CHANDRADEO PRASAD SON OF LATE BANGALI PRASAD RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MALANCHAK MORE, KUMAR VEDIOGRAPHY MAIN ROAD, JEHANBAD, POLICE STATION, JEHANBAD , DISTRICT – JEHANBAD. Versus 1. THE ADMINISTRATOR,BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPOR CORPORATION, SULTAN PALACE, PARIVAHAN BHAWAN, PATNA. 2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, BIHAR STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, GAYA. 3. THE CHIEF ACCOUNT OFFICER, SULTAN PALACE, PARIVAHAN BHAWAN, PATNA ----------- 22.12.2009 Heard the parties. The grievance of the petitioner, who retired from the office of respondent – Corporation, is with regard to the payment of contributory provident fund. It is further submitted that petitioner was informed that he was entitled to the Provident fund to the tune of Rs. 1,31,460, 75/- It is further submitted that on such information, he has filed a representation before the respondent – corporation stating with regard to the fact that similar situated employers have been allowed higher amount of the provident fund dues. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 3 enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of such claim along with certified copy of the present order within a 2 period of eight weeks from today. In case such representation is filed, the respondent no. 3 shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievance of the petitioner as raised in his representation could be settled without further delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)