CRM- M 33638 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M 33638 of 2011 Date of decision : December 14, 2011 Ekamjeet Singh, ...... Petitioner v. State of Punjab, ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. C.S.Bagri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG Punjab *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.123, dated 1.7.2011, registered under Sections 307, 452, 323, 148, 149, 427 of the IPC, and Sections 25, 27, 54, 59 of the Arms Act, at Police Station Samrala. On 8.11.2011, the following contention was noticed :- “ Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the order dated 12.10.2011 passed in CRM-M No.29621 of 2011 to contend that the co-accused Jaspal Singh was granted the benefit of anticipatory bail.” Apart from that, counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner is also juvenile and in fact, as per him, co-accused Jaspal Singh was attributed a fire arm injury. CRM- M 33638 of 2011 ::2:: Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from ASI Major Singh, has accepted these factual assertions. In these circumstances, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Consequently, in the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Investigating Officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 14, 2011. JUDGE `kk'