OF ^iineir^^ ^1 y g^g^.^r fnR&M ^^'^^s^s^a Petitioner i'BI 'st £a.n>i Gan.qa Prasad Patei S/o late Shri Suraj Bhan Patei a.qed about 45 years, R/o vi'lage Banbarad, Post ndni Mines Ahiwari, Tahsii dha, DIstrict Durg (C.G.) The Executive Engineer Tanduia 'vVater Resources Division Dur.g, District Dura fC.G.I ^J i^-FJi< a i~-u' ^ 1^? ^q i S^ ^. ~^r ^ l*t-p( • The Sub Divisional Officer, Tandi Water Resources Sub Division •Adma.bada, Balod, district Durg /r* r^. \ /.^..l Wrlt 1 I^ ^E U^ hhattisaarh t' Present: S.hri C.K. Sahu, learnec' counsel for the appeliant. Shri .Kishore Bhaduri, learned Additlonal Ad'/ocate Genera! for ths State/ respondents. •ielUfeJi^lVJ^IM 1 t" ftainr.c.t U iUf •> foilrjwinn ii.irJnm?5Ht of fh?a P.Qnrt" \AfiS^ n?9;%sQi t Sitw'1 •.\-iiti^'VV 3 ; If^A j ^i-'^i-t i ;-i's/s it. i^rS li iiur \«>"u-'^i L Wrai.? B^Sfi'hSO'i.r'uS ti/'g ^l^ if %!' 1 ^" r- uuDta. c.j. tsmsa COUHSBI TOF tns osmes BTQ nesrd on sfjmis^ i* 3 1 'to^^d'i 3 ^rfr2 ^3 3 T*/ 3w^ ^^j ^3 "^/^n? ^rfil ^/ i J '^wr lu^I ^iS \*^^ a ^S, ^fl ^ I J S^r'^^i^^i 3 + \r 2) AppellanV petitioner Ganga Prasad Patel has filed this writ appealagainsttheimpugnedorderdated 21-04-2010, passed in W.P.(L)No. 1798/2010. 3) The appellant/petitioner in thewrit petition was challenging that part of the order of the Labour Court whereby the back-wages were denied to him. - 4) Learned Single Judge on a thorough consideration of the submissions of learned counsel fbr the petitioner found that the petitioner neither pleaded nor proyed that he was not ga(ifully employed xiuring the period, after tiis termination and titl the date the Labour Court directed hjs reinstatement. Learned Single Judge, therefore, did not find any gQod ground warranting interference in exercise of the jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 @f the Gonstitution of India. 5) Qn due corisideration ofthe submi^ions of learned counsel for the parties, we dp not find any inTirmity in the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge which may Warrant interference in this intra Cot/rtappeal. 6) The writ appeal, therefore; is liable to be dismissed and is herebydismissedsummarily. ,. :_ Sd/- ChiefJustice subbu Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge !Ll. •; ^7-"TTT-:faT?^'.'?p-^y7?rAr~'^^.^-l.-^^:7f' s^^^^^^^a3^sSSf^