IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR CHHATTISGARH ^ -. . \V.P.No.^{K"/06 PETITIONER .M L<K..'>i ^••'A'..^ ^^p^^,.. <3'^''v<^T...•••"'"' ^-••]^^'"" 9y\5^''"' ^^...•••- "(^"" s""- SmtS.Minj, W/o Shri T.S-Sahu, Aged about 27 Yrs. Auxiliary Nurse Midwife, Presently posted at, Sub Center- Gram Cherra, Community Health Center, Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.), R/o Gram Cherra, Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS .-<'^ RESPONDENT / ^^ ^ ^':^' ^ .v^^ ^-o- 1. StateofC.G. Through : Secretary, Health & Public Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. BlockMedicalOfficer, Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPMATE WRIT. WRITS. ORDER. DIRECTIONS ETC. XI-HC-22 a'n^rw l^iwsn^r StiWfi <lR(1 l^.' (@ 3^'.<<wid^, ®T(I«'I<S,Ritiwy 3ll^l Macb l .U^.K>D,'Z.3.t Rre^ 111CTI SBIIch t9TMs|cb \ _ ^.U^,-Z.3.!b^l0^ 3<l^l<WIWflfeT T2-7-2! courtse Cenfre Shri Manish Sharma, courjs Miss Dipali Pandey, Pan^i advance copy. Heard both the counsel. The main srievance raiset that she is working as Auxiliary t^ Cherra, Community Health her own expenses vide order ^ Jashpur under the Chief Medica^ that the fransfer has been effect^d Learned counse! for thel never made such a request and| her own request and that is ofdsr ISself that they are trar counse! for the petitioner furthei) may be aliowed to make a detaii)! rectifying this mistake to vvhich objection. Having heard jearned coilf record, without expressing any made by iearned counse! for th|< fherefore, the petitioner js a!l< aiong with copy of this petition days from today and in turn, resj decide representation of the petttl wtjy 4>i«fi'<41-<t<iti<-fT^'fe'<ft <Rt^i< ^gri^Tan^fT for the petitioner. Lawyer for the State/respondents, on pi by the petitioner in this writ petition.is :urse Midwife (ANM) at Sub Centre Gram i, Kurud, she has been transferred on |ated 29-6-2006 by respondent No.1 to and Health Officer, Jashpur considering on the request of the petitioner. petitioner submitted that the petitioner she has been transferred on the ground it has been mentioned in the impugned on their own expenses. Learned submitted that, therefore, the petitioner ed representation to respondent No.1 for iearned counsel for respondents has no insel for the parties, having perused the 3pinion on ths merit of the case, prayer e petifioner is just, fair and reasonabte, to make a detailed representation respondent No.1 within a period of 10 sondent No.1 is directed to consider and :ioner within a period of 30 days from the ofred do ('My^f) ^S~Y XI-HC-22 an^TW R-fi'tsn^T shiiqi ufta shliqi /••• ^^ Ssi! '^st' Baive ^./ ^^ ^' ^ >~ <> '.^ & ^) *11*1CTI iftHlch 3^ •*{MW^, w^v'w, ^v\My, 3ll^l 4^<h •W]; 200 ftreg date. of receipt of representation, with law. However, as the petitioner the petitioner whereas, no such the post where the petitioner is view of the above, effect and respect of the petitioner shal in an objective manner, in accordance 1 has been fransferred on the request of ^equest was made by the petitioner and ^orking is still lying vacant, ther^fore, in op^ration of the impugned transfer order in [•emain stayed tiii the decision of the With the direction aforesait Consequently, M.(W.)P. N' Parties are entitled for cert q)i<<tfi<fl-< tiiitiTfftel<II <Rtt<ii< ^tsri^irsn^r I, the petition stands disposed of. ^.2605/2006 also stands disposed of. |fied copy of this order. Sdi- L.C. SN®50 judge (^^feir) v