IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20652 of 2009 RANJEET SINGH @ RANJEET KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 03.09.2009 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Section 395 of Indian Penal Code. It appears that house dacoity was committed by 15 unknown miscreants. In course of investigation, confessional statement of co-accused Manoj Sahni, Ram Binod Sahni and Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Sahni were recorded. Co-accuseds Manoj Sahni and Ram Binod Sahni are said to have disclosed the name of the petitioner along Dinesh Sahni and Pappu Sahni. By filing supplementary affidavit, it is submitted that co-accused Pappu Sahni @ Pappu Kumar Sahni and Dinesh Sahni have been granted privilege of bail by this court under order dated 25.7.2009 (Annexure-2). Learned counsel states that the case of the petitioner stands on identical footing. Learned A.P.P. looking to the case diary, does not dispute this position. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Samastipur (M) 2 P.S. case no. 676 of 2008 subject to the condition that one of the bailers will be own/close family member of the petitioner. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )