IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10075 of 2011 SHAMSHER AHMAD @ SHAMSHER KHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 18.04.2011 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 394 of the I.P.C. The accusation is that the informant along with other persons were going to deposit Rs. 3,00,000/- cash in the bank when the culprits resorted to fire and took away the bags. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that informant has not levelled any allegation against the petitioner as the F.I.R. was lodged against the unknown and a petition to the effect has been filed by the informant before learned Court below that actually this petitioner took the informant to the hospital in injured condition. It is further submitted that other accused persons have been granted regular bail. I see no reason for learned Court below not to give the same privilege to the petitioner as this Court is not inclined to interfere only on the ground that the case was registered in 2006. It is expected that learned Court below will pass appropriated order with regard to the regular bail application of the petitioner, preferably on the same day, 2 keeping in view of the fact that other persons have been granted regular bail and the informant has not supported the accusation against the petitioner in connection with Waarisnagar P.S. Case No. 77 of 2006. With the observations made above, the application stands disposed off. Let the order of this Court be transmitted through FAX to the learned Court below at the cost of the petitioner. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)