IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2011 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1933 OP(C).No. 1363 of 2011(O ) OS.2561/2007 OF PRL.MUNSIFF COURT,THRISSUR PETITIONER: SHEEBA, W/O.SUBASH, CHIRUKANDATH HOUSE, VENKITANGU DESOM, THRISSURE TALUK AND DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.SUBRAMANIAM SRI.M.S.NARAYANAN SRI.P.T.GIRIJAN SMT.USHA NARAYANAN RESPONDENT: JOHN, S/O.CHAKKORU, OLLUKARAN HOUSE, KURIACHIRA DESOM, OLLUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, P.O.KURIACHIRA, PIN-680 306. ADV. SRI.JIJO PAUL THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------ O.P.(C). NO. 1363 OF 2011 O ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 25th day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner filed I.A.No.5953 of 2009 in O.S.No.2561 of 2007, on the file of the Court of the Principal Munsiff of Thrissur, under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure to amend the decree on the ground that the decree is not in tune with the judgment. The learned Munsiff dismissed the application by the order dated 19th December, 2009. One of the grounds on which the application was dismissed was that an appeal against the decree was pending. Subsequently, the appeal filed by the respondent was dismissed for non-prosecution. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the light of the order passed by the trial court, the petitioner approached the Appellate Court by filing appropriate application under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure. However, since the appeal was dismissed for non- prosecution, the application filed by the petitioner under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure was also dismissed by the Appellate Court. O.P.(C) NO.1363 OF 2011 :: 2 :: 2. Subsequently, the petitioner filed I.A.No.10384 of 2010 before the trial court to amend the decree. The grievance of the petitioner is that though the application was filed in 2010, the same has not been taken up for hearing and disposed of. It is submitted that the application was adjourned on several occasions and now it is posted to 2.6.2011. 3. The respondent has no objection in directing the court below to dispose of the application at the earliest. In the facts and circumstances, the Original Petition is disposed of directing the Munsiff's Court, Thrissur to hear and dispose of I.A.No.10384 of 2010 as expeditiously as possible and, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/