IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 7677 of 1989 Date of Decision: February 26, 2009 Pritam Singh Jubbal ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR Present: Mr. Brijeshwar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab, for the respondent. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous because it was directed against order of transfer dated 24/29.5.1989 (P-2). After the order of transfer was stayed, the petitioner has retired from service. Accordingly, the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (M.M. KUMAR) February 26, 2009 JUDGE Pkapoor