IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.864 of 2009 Date of Decision : 23.11.2009 Ramandeep Singh and another .....Petitioner versus Smt.Prem Kaur .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Swaran Singh, Senior Advocate, with Mr.N.S.Rapri, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Jagjit Singh, Advocate, for the respondent. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-landlords have invoked the powers of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Executing Court to take appropriate steps for implementation of the ejectment order dated 29.8.2005. The undisputed facts are that the petitioners filed an ejectment petition under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 against the respondent-tenant-Smt.Prem Kaur, which was though dismissed by the Rent Controller, Kapurthala, but allowed by the Appellate Authority, Kapurthala and the revision petition preferred by the respondent was C.R. No.864 of 2009 (O&M) 2 dismissed by this Court vide order dated 27.10.2005. The respondent went in SLP before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, which too was dismissed as withdrawn. In the execution application, the respondent is stated to have filed objections, inter-alia, claiming the ownership of the demised premises on the basis of a Will executed by the grand-father of the petitioner- landlords. Those objections having been entertained and as a consequential delay in implementation/execution of the eviction order that the petitioners are before this Court. Learned counsel for the parties have been heard and the record perused. In my considered view, the pendency of the Civil Suit between the parties in which the respondent is allegedly claiming title on the basis of Will, has possibly no bearing on the execution of the eviction order which has already been upheld upto the highest Court. The learned Executing Court is accordingly directed to take appropriate measures to ensure that the order dated 29.8.2005, which has already attained finality, be given effect forthwith. The compliance report be sent to this Court. Disposed of. Dasti. 23-11-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE