IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 57 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- GIRISHKUMAR SHANTILAL PANDYA Versus STATE OF GUJRAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR ASHWIN V BHATT for Petitioner MR KC SHAH, ADD.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE Date of decision: 29/03/96 ORAL JUDGEMENT Rule. Learned Govt. Counsel Mr. K.C. Shah, waives the service of Rule for the respondent. The grievance made by the petitioner in the petition is that, though the FIR has been registered on January 11, 1995 regarding the offences, allegedly committed between November 17, 1994 and December 8, 1994, absolutely, no progress whatsoever has been made. It is the grievance made by the petitioner further that, he is being assured by the police that, the investigation has commenced, but probably, the petitioner is not able to accept this say. The present petition can be disposed of, by saying that, the DSP, Bhuj or any officer to be appointed by him or any other officer, who is incharge of the investigation, shall complete the investigation, as early as possible, and at any rate, within a period of three months hereof. Rule is made absolute accordingly. *****