IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12468 of 2006 Between: Midda Kurva Parvathalu S/o.Lingaiah R/o.Chennaram (V), Gopalpet (M) Mahaboobnagar District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, & Appellate Authority Mahaboobnagar District at Mahaboobnagar 2 The Joint Collector & Returning Officer, Zilla Parishad Mahaboobnagar 3 The Revenue Divisional officer, Wanaparthy Mahaboobnagar District 4 State Election Committee, rep.by its Secretary Budda Bhavan, Tank Bund, Hyderabad 5 B.Kodanda Raman Goud S/o.Jagannadh Goud R/o.Gopalpet village and mandal Mahaboobnagar district .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in passing order in proceedings No.H1/5/2006dated 20.6.2006 in dismissing the Appeal confirming the rejection of nomination by the 2nd respondent in proceedings No.D1/1570/2006 dated 18.6.2006 as bad illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to accept the petitioner nomination for the post of ZPTC Gopalpet, Mahaboobnagar District as a valid nomination and alos to accept B-form to be submitted by the petitioner in the ensuring election. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.DAMODAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 12468 of 2006 O R D E R: Since the matter relates to elections held in the year 2006, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication as on today. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 23-07-2008 KLP