$ I I I a 72# o/o 26.04.2010 Present:- Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, Advocate for petitioner. Ms. Sana Ansari , Advocate with Ms. Zubeda begum, Advocate for respondents. C.M. No. 5542/2OLO in W.P.(C) No.2776r2OLO * Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) No.2776l2O1O * By this petition filed under Articie 22G of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing of the letter dated 4.3.20L0 issued by the respondent whereby the respondent has turned down the request of the petitioner institute for the enhancement of the fee I structure. I have heard counsel for the petitioner. Perusal of the letter dated 4.3.2010 shows that.the request of the petitioner for the enhancement of fee structure was turned down by the respondent on the ground that the petitioner failed to submit the requisite D D , Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified D 2- information before the said Fee Regulatory Committee. The respondent has required the petitioner to apply for the enhancement of fee structure for the next academic year. No response to the said letter contradicting the contents thereof was sent by the petitioner and straightaway the petitioner has chosen to file the present writ petition. Since now the petitioner in the present petition has taken a stand that the petitioner has submitted the information in the requisite format therefore let the present petition be treated as a representation by the respondent and appropriate decision thereon be taken by the respondent after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Decision will be taken by the respondent |l within three weeks from the date of this order. Order Dasti. April 26,2O1.O pkv HIR, J. : , A tlt)t/lw I(AII.ASH GAMB