IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.3880 of 2008 Date of decision: July 14, 2011. Rachhpal Kaushal & Ors. ... Appellant(s) v. Shanti Devi @ Sushma Rattan & Ors. ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: None for the appellant(s). Shri Sunil Tandon, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia , J. (Oral): On 1.12.2009, this Court while directing the Counsel for the appellants to furnish correct addresses of respondents No.4, 5 and 6 within a week and had adjourned the matter to 28.1.2010. On 28.1.2010, the case was adjourned to 5.4.2010 on written request circulated by the counsel. On 5.4.2010, again a written request was circulated and the case was adjourned to 7.7.2010. On 7.7.2010, this Court noticed that notices could not be issued to respondents No.4 to 6 as the Counsel for the appellants had not filed correct addresses. The case was adjourned to 14.10.2010 to enable the Counsel to file correct addresses. On 14.10.2010, a written request was circulated and the case was adjourned to 2.2.2011. On 2.2.2011, this Court noticed that notices could not be issued to respondents No.4 to 6 as the Counsel had not filed the correct addresses and posted the case for 8.4.2011. On 8.4.2011, the case was adjourned to 14.7.2011 as the Counsel for the appellant made a request for adjournment. Today, no body is present on behalf of the appellants. A period of one year and eight months is going to elapse. In spite of availing various opportunities to furnish correct addresses of respondents No.4 to 6 in the Registry, no effort has been made. It seems that the appellant is not interested to pursue the present appeal. Hence, the same is dismissed for non prosecution. [Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] July 14, 2011. Judge kadyan