[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.716 OF 2008 Smt.Sujata Samuel ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondent ... Mr.J.S.Kini i/b Suresh Dubey Advocate for Applicant Mrs.P.P.Shinde APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 8, 2008 DATE : JULY 8, 2008 DATE : JULY 8, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in CR No.8 of 2008 of Chinchwad Police Station, Pune. The said case is under Sections 420 and 408 of IPC. 3. The prosecution case is that the applicant who is a lady was working with Frankfinn. People used to pay fees for attending various courses in the said Institute and the prosecution case is that, out of said fees, amount of Rs.96,000/- has been misappropriated by the applicant. The applicant has deposited Rs.96,000/- in this Court. The [-2-] learned advocate for the applicant on instructions from the applicant who is present in the Court, has stated that the said amount may be handed over to the Investigating Agency without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the applicant in the trial. The learned APP states that if the amount is handed over to the Investigating Agency, the custody of the applicant would not be required. In this view of the matter, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. 4. In the event of arrest, the applicant-Smt.Sujata Samuel to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.thirty thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant to report to Chinchwad police station, Pune twice in a week till filing of the charge sheet and thereafter as and when required. 5. Application disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]