IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.939 of 2008 SIKANDAR RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 8. 5.12.2008. N.H./ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner on point of admission. The order dated 9.9.2008 would go to show that the limitation matter is also pending which is to be considered at the time of admission. The condonation for delay has been sought through I.A. No.1836 of 2008. It appears that the delay is about one year and six months. The petitioner has already been released from jail after serving the sentence. On perusal of I.A., it appears that no cogent reason has been assigned for such inordinate delay in filing this Cr. Revision. So far the merit of the case is concerned, there is a concurrent finding of two courts. Both the courts have properly considered the oral as well as documentary evidence. Under the facts and circumstances, the limitation petition along with this application for revision is hereby rejected at admission stage. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )