IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9671 of 2011 Sitanath Chaubey & Ors Versus Ramawatar Lal & Ors ----------- 02. 27.06.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. This writ application has been filed against the order dated 20.01.2011 passed in Title Appeal No.41 of 2005 by the learned A.D.J.(F.T.C.) V, Buxar whereby the application filed by the petitioner to add subsequent purchaser a party in the appeal and also to amend the plaint accordingly has been rejected. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below considering the provision as contained in Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act has held that the transfer made during the pendency of the appeal will be subject to the result of the appeal and the parties are litigating for last 33 years. In view of the above observation of the learned Court below and the fact that the plaintiff is not at all required to make the transferee pen dentelite a party in the appeal, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)