1 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.1895 of 2010 Mallinath Shankarrao Dhange ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents ... Mr. R.M. Haridas i/b P.M.Joshi for the petitioner. Mr.R.M.Patne AGP for respondent no.1. Mr.Nitin Jamdar for respondent no.2. Mr.Vijay Killedar for respondent no.21 CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATED : 25th June 2010 P.C. 1. By an order dated 17 March 2010, this Court rejected the contention of the petitioner regarding the compensation not being granted in respect of the construction standing on the land. That question is no longer open before the court. As regards the interest, counsel for the petitioner states that he has no grievance regarding the interest and has a grievance only regarding solatium which has been allowed @ 13% by an order of this court. He submits that statutory solatium has to be 30% and not 13%. It appears that 13% is a typographical error. The petitioner is therefore free to apply for review of that order. No other grievance is made before me. Hence, writ petition is disposed of with liberty as above. (D.G. KARNIK,J.)