HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.32742 of 2011 Dated:14.12.2011 Between: Lode Venkateshwarlu Rao .. Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.32742 of 2011 O R D E R: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. Since the issue involved in this writ petition falls in a short compass, the writ petition itself is disposed of by the consent of both the learned counsel. The petitioner purchased an extent of Acs.4.35 gts. in Survey No.461 of Thonda Village, Tirumalgiri Mandal, Nalgonda District under an unregistered sale deed and sought regularisation thereof under Section 5-A of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971. On the petitioner’s application, respondent No.3 allegedly conducted enquiry in File No.B/1527/2006 and completed all legal formalities, but did not implement the order. The petitioner states that implementation was withheld on account of the interim order passed by this Court in W.P.No.8558 of 2009, dated 24.04.2009, which was instituted by respondent No.4 herein. The petitioner states that the said order was sought to be vacated at his instance in W.V.M.P.No.1776 of 2009 whereupon this Court recorded in the order dated 02.11.2011 that the earlier order of interim suspension was only for a period of two months, which expired long back and as such there is no need to vacate the said order. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, submits that since there is no stay order in operation and no further order is granted to respondent No.4 herein, there is no impediment for respondent No.3 to implement the order in petitioner’s application for regularisation of the sale transaction as per enquiry already conducted in respondent No.3’s file No.B/1527/2006. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents 1 to 3 submits that if there is no supervening order staying the proceedings before the Tahsildar, there is no impediment for passing further orders by him. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.3 to issue notice to respondent No.4 herein as well as the petitioner to appear for further enquiry, if any, and pass final orders in File No.B/1527/2006 in accordance with law expeditiously within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J 14.12.2011 Note:- Furnish C.C. by 19.12.2011 (B/o) KH