IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 28TH JUNE 2011 / 7TH ASHADHA 1933 WA.No. 1265 of 2010 --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.15494/2010 DATED 08/06/2010 .................... APPELLANT/FIRST RESPONDENT IN WP(C): ------------------------------------------------ UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS & SPORTS, SHASTHRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI. BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,A.S.G OF INDIA RESPONDENT/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 IN THE W.P.(C): --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. J.UDAYAKUMAR, SON OF SHRI JANARDHANAN, KABADDI COACH, KERALA STATE SPORTS COUNCIL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 1, (RESIDING AT "PANCHAVADI", NO.T.C.31/506 (5), Y.M.A.ROAD, CHACKAI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 24. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, MINISTRY OF YOUTH & SPORTS AFFAIRS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE KERALA STATE SPORTS COUNCIL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. SHRI.T.P.DASAN, PRESIDENT, KERALA STATE SPORTS COUNCIL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. R1 BY SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM R2 BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. BENNY GERVACIS R3 BY ADV. PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHEER,SC,SPORTS COUNCIL THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/06/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.Chelameswar, C.J. & Antony Dominic, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A.No. 1265 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT Antony Dominic, J. The respondents in W.P.(C) No. 15494 of 2010 have filed this appeal aggrieved by the interim order dated 08.06.2010. 2. The appeal was admitted and the impugned order was also suspended. It is now brought to our notice that the writ petition itself is listed for hearing. Therefore, we do not think that there is any necessity to examine the contentions on merits raised by the parties. Therefore, we dispose of the appeal itself, leaving it open to the parties to agitate their respective contentions as and when the writ petition is taken up for final hearing. J.Chelameswar, Chief Justice. Antony Dominic, Judge. ttb