1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3739 OF 2009 (Ku. Vandana M. Tayade ..vs.. State of Maharashtra and others) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri S.S. Jachak, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri A.S. Fulzele, A.G.P. for respondent No.1, Shri A.P. Tathod, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 & 4, Shri Sachin Zoting, Advocate for respondent No.5. CORAM:- D.B. BHOSALE AND P. B. VARALE, JJ. DATED :- 29 th JULY, 2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 & 4 submits that though an order of appointment is issued in favour of respondent No.5, they have not allowed her to join, since she has not produced her original documents before respondent No.2. He submits that unless she produces all the original documents, she will not be allowed to join. He further submits that if respondent No.5 fails to produce the original documents within a period of two months from today, they will consider the claim of the petitioner, who is next in the merit list for appointment on the post of Anganwadi Sevika. The statement made by the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 4 are accepted. 2 3. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this writ petition on merits. The writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. JUDGE JUDGE pma