r3 < $INGLE BE’EW‘H IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(5)No. %2W /2011 /P.L. Sac, 5/0 MR. Sao, aged abouT 58 years, Administra’rive Officer, in / fhe office of Superintendent WNW PETITIONER ‘{A w... Engineer (Sanchalan — Sundharan) Korba wes’r, Disf'r. Korba (C.G.) 3. AddiTional Superim‘enden'r Engineer (Civil) Sudhar Sambhag, Chha’r’riSgarh Rajya VidyuT Mandal, Korba WesT, DIS‘H. Korba (C.G.) 4. ExecuTive Engineer, Chha’rfisgarh Rajya Vidyui' Mandal, Rajnandgaon, Disf’r. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONsTITUTION OF INDIA. g;;;.;......f§‘~_f.'...... %§“ 5%\/$t)$$“”. \b Circle, Janjgir, DisT’r. Janjgir— Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1./ Chhaffisgarh Sfdfe Power Holding Company Limited, Daganiya, Raipur, Disf’r. Raipur‘ (C.G.) 2.’ Chief Engineer, (Utpadan) ChhaHisgarh Rajya Vidyu’r Mandal, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.824 OF 2011 -——-——_—__.__— Limited & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Govind Dewangan, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. w” ORDER IORALI (Passed on this 10‘ day of February, 201 1) s Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition, to which Iearned counsel appearing for the State has no objection. It is ordered, as prayed for. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge WW. W gti i PETITIONER P.L. Sao Versus RESPONDENTS Chhattisgarh State Power Holding