IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15012 of 2010 1. ARUN PASWAN SON OF KULDEEP PASWAN 2. KAMIYA DEVI WIFE OF FUCHO PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.5.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 498A and 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner no.1 is the husband of the deceased and petitioner no.2 is the co-villager of the husband of the deceased and initially a U.D. case was instituted by the father of the informant and thereafter the present case was instituted by his son and now the charge sheet has been submitted u/s.306 I.P.C., let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Naugachia, District Bhagalpur in Parabatta P.S.case No.69 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners and (ii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed - 2 - for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )