IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30138 of 2009 CHANDAN KUMAR SINGH @ PUTUL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 01/09/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the informant. The Sessions Judge, Samastipur has passed the impugned order dated 9.6.2009 rejecting the prayer for bail in Sessions Trial No.339/09 of the petitioner after perusing the case diary. There is absolutely no discussion in the order of the materials that he noticed from the case diary to substantiate his conclusion not to grant bail. The order concludes that the petitioner was the husband and the co-accused had been granted regular bail by this Court. The conclusion is abrupt with no reasons. The present application is, therefore, remanded to the court of the Sessions Judge, Samastipur to pass a fresh reasoned and speaking order from the materials in the case diary either in support of the rejection of bail or grant of bail, to facilitate judicial review, if necessary. For the purpose, the petitioner shall file an affidavit along with a copy of the present order when his 2 bail application disposed off on 9.6.2009 shall be taken up for fresh consideration. The application stands disposed in the aforesaid terms. Let this order be communicated by FAX to the court of Sessions Judge, Samastipur in context of Sessions Trial No.339/09 by the Court. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)