IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD1CATURE AT BILASPURfC.G.) S-ll'2-10.^ WRTTfflmiQMNa" ^-2005 PETmQNER: RESPQNDEWre .) ^ -t H l^'^^y ....-f"^". l^^f^'^r ^^s^-:^;'^"1 (•'" ..^v^"' ...-•"'s~in f '^^^^ ^•••-6,1' cusa& "& 1) Ku, Raiijaisa Kancya, E'/oK.P.Kantg'B aQQ30[ about- 27yeafs, R/'oSftantf Nagar, Naer Ram ?4aroltr> Ratpur,C£. VERSUS i) v»& Stete of c.a. "nwou^ ^cretery Higher EduGatiQn/ D.K.S. Bbawan, Rajpur{C.G.) 2) The VKS ChaiK^lor Tfeough the Registrar, PamlS: Ravi Shaiikar Shufcfa, Univensif?, Raipur(C.G.} 3) Tte Princ.ipdl, Pramda <3okut Das Daga Qris Co(teg&, fdtchahari Chowk,Raipur(C.G.) 4) The Prsidenl,. Ras'hbiya Vidyalaya Commi^s, Katchahari chcwk, Bal ^hfam Camfsue, Raspw (C.G.) 5] Tfie Uhiveisity Qant Cbmmteton Uew Dedudncfial WRD' PETmCtN UNDER WTICI-E 22&Q27 OFTHE CQNSTTTUT70N OF JNDJA XI-HC-78 ~S^ •<ii<iici<<, »Tnw'is,Pifii+fy <-n*(^fT ShWb ^- 200 Sff^T T^T ('i?^^) 3n^r^irR-)i+ traTsn^Tsti*i ?T(ITSK?ri?(T'W^T 25.8.2006 aitUd When the matter is petitioner. No representation is| Shri 0.K. Beriwal, Oy. copy. By -the inst<mt petition| termination order doted 28.2.201 with •ttie petition, -therefore, order dated 16.11.2005 feanied weeks' time to remove the filed As the termination order it is not the case wrfier®the order, therefore, I.A. No.7121/Q challenging her termination petitioner's petition cannot Accordmgly, the petition i\ out, none present on behalf of the Imade. SwNBral fer the State on achwice AdvS»cote 2.20|OS trie def^ct for exemptin9 the petitiont)r from fitin9 p^tit °t>i<<f<-i<fl-i iiiaTftte^)'<Ri«;k ^sri^irsn^r the petitioner has challenged her i, but •the same has notbeen cmnexed matter remained defective and vide ^ounsel for the petitioner was given two and now, l.A. No.7t21/06 has been terminationonler. |s the bcisis of filing of Ihispetition, and ^titioner cannot obtain •the termination j6 cannot be allowed, as the petitioner is and without filing the same, the ortter beeycided. Ip dismissed for non-proseeution. r^^» P.T.O.