IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID THURSDAY, THE 18TH AUGUST 2011 / 27TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 13834 of 2011(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- USMAN POOLANTHARAKKAL S/O. MOIDUNNI HAJI, POONATHARAKKAL HOUSE, KODATHOOR, P.O.PERUMPADAPPU, VADAKKEKAD VILLAGE & DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. BY ADV. MR.V.C.MADHAVANKUTTY RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY IT SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. PERUMPADAPPU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PERUMPADAPPU- PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. MOOSAKUTTY. S/O. UMMER, CHUNDAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KODATHOOR, PERUMPADAPPU.P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.ABDUL SALAM FOR R1. ADV. MR.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL FOR R2 MR.S.SHAJI FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 13834 of 2011(D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: SALE DEED DTD. 7.11.1964 EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF MOIDUNNI HAJI. EXT.P2; DEATH CERTIFICATE DTD. 25.3.2003 OF MOIDUNNI HAJI ISSUED FROM PERUMPADAPPU GRAMA PANCHAYAT. EXT.P3: APPLICATION DTD. 5.1.2010 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R2. EXT.P4: DISCHARGE SUMMARY OF THE EPTITIONER ISSUED FROM ELITE MISSION HOSPITAL. EXT.P5: PETITION DTD. 2.9.2010 FILED BY THE EPTITIONER BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION OFFICER. EXT.P6: REPLY DTD. 17.9.2010 ISSUED BY SECRETARY, PERUMPADAPPU GRAMA PANCHAYAT. EXT.P7: PETITION DTD. 4.10.2010 FILED BEFORE THE STATE ASSISTANT PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER. EXT.P8: ORDER NO.D5.12906/10/K.DIS DTD.22.10.2010 OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL ..... // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.13834 Of 2011 ---------------------- Dated this the 18th day of August, 2011. J U D G M E N T Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and 2nd respondent. 2. The writ petition is filed seeking a direction directing the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 representation within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the 2nd respondent submits that Ext.P3 was considered and order was passed. It is pointed out that Ext.P3 was disposed of without hearing the petitioner. The learned counsel for the Panchayath submitted that they have no objection in re-considering Ext.P3 representation after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. 4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, a direction is issued to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 representation after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-