Crl. Misc. No.M-20283 of 2011 (O&M) Naveen Dahiya Vs. State of Haryana Present : Mr. Amrainder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shekhar Mudgal, A.A.G., Haryana. ******* AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R. No.89 dated 29.04.2010 registered under Sections 148, 149, 302 IPC at Police Station Mullana, District Ambala. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner has now been in custody for the last 1 year and 3 months and that he was not named in the FIR. He has further argued that the present is a case where the complainant has named as many as nine persons and there is no mention in the FIR that any other person was also involved. Both the parties are class fellows and it could not have been possible that if the petitioner was present on the spot he would not have been named and the petitioner has been made accused only on the disclosure statements of the co-accused. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon the order dated 26.05.2011 passed in CRM-M No.11411 of 2011 wherein similarly situated co-accused – Gurmeet Maan was also not named in the FIR and also granted the concession of bail. Learned Assistant Advocate General has not been able to distinguish the case of Gurmeet Maan from the case of the petitioner. Crl. Misc. No.M-20283 of 2011 (O&M) -2- In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to release the petitioner on regular bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Ordered accordingly. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 24, 2011 JUDGE ashish