IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12601 of 1999 Between: K. Rambabu … Petitioner AND The Andhra Bank Employees Cooperative Bank Ltd., rep., by its Secretary, Koti, Hyderabad. … Respondent Counsel for the petitioner : Sri K. Ramesh for Sri S.R. Sanku This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12601 of 1999 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… … Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, declaring the action of the respondent in suspending the petitioner on 06.04.1999 as without authority, declaring the action of the respondent in not paying the subsistence allowance to the petitioner as illegal and vitiating the departmental proceedings pursuant to the charge sheet No.41-92 dated 06.04.1999 declaring the action of the respondent in not deferring the departmental proceedings pending criminal case as illegal and it is further consequently prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to set aside the suspension order of the petitioner dated 26.04.1999 to direct the payment of subsistence allowance to the petitioner immediately including arrears and to direct the respondent to defer the departmental enquiry against the petitioner pursuant to the charge sheet dated 06.04.1999 pending the criminal case against the petitioner in Crime No.133/99 on the file of the III Addl. JFCM, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District which are similar to the said departmental proceedings and to pass such other or further order as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” At the hearing, Sri K. Ramesh representing Sri S.R.Sanku, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the said submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.15383 of 1999 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 25.11.2008 ES