IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15223 of 2011 1. Dinesh Yadav, son of Laxman Yadav. 2. Laxman Yadav, son of Late Veeru Yadav. R/O Village-Habibpur, P.S. Chandauti, District- Gaya…………………………………………………………………………Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Sony Devi, W/O Dinesh Yadav, D/O Deochand Yadav, resident of Village- Habibpur, P.S. Chandauti, District-Gaya, at present R/O Village- Kujap, P.S. Chandauti, District- Gaya……………………………………………………………………...Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 13.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the husband and father of the husband are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498(A), 420, 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of demand of dowry and torture. The marriage was performed in 2006. From the own statement of the complainant, it appears that she has knowledge about the first wife. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that second marriage was performed since there was no issue from the first wife. The petitioner no.1 is ready to keep 2 the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner no.1 , above named, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for six months and so far as petitioner no. 2 is concerned, since thrust of accusation is against the husband and he is quite old person, let petitioner no. 2 above named be also released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 1772 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Ist Class, Magistrate, District- Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned court below will issue notice to the complainant and on her appearance the petitioner no.1 will take back the complainant to her matrimonial home to keep her as wife with full dignity and 3 honour. Learned court below will confirm the provisional anticipatory bail of petitioner no.1 on substantial restoration of matrimonial harmony or if the complainant refuses to reside with petitioner no.1. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)