:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.404 OF 2007 Mrs.Rukhmini Shivlingappa Deshmukh thru’ . Shri.Shivlingoppa Shivravappa Deshmukh . & Anr. ...Petitioners V/s. Shri.Sopanrao Narhari Kalekar & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Prathamesh Bhargude i/b. Mr.Sugandh Deshmukh, Advocate, for the Petitioners. . Mr.Piyush Shah, Advocate, for Respondent No.1. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : March 28, 2007. Date : March 28, 2007. Date : March 28, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard. The petitioners have impugned the Decree of Eviction passed by the Small Causes Court at Pune and confirmed by the learned Appellate Court on 05.12.2006 under the Bombay Rent Act. The petitioners have the alternate statutory remedy of filing Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the C.P.C. and hence this petition need not be entertained. 2. The petition is disposed with liberty to file Civil Revision Application. The undertaking furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners shall continue to operate for two weeks more from today. :2: (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)