IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2011 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 34560 of 2009(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ RAMESH BABU, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.RAVEENDRAN NAIR, USHA NILAYAM, KEEZHCHERI MURI, CHENGANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.HARIDAS RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALLEPPEY. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHENGANNUR. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHENGANNUR. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHENGANNUR. 6. SOMAN PILLAI, MANAGER, CHENGANNUR MAHADEVA TEMPLE, CHENGANNUR. RESIDING AT CHERUKATTU (KOCHU MULAPPONE) THOTTAPUZHASSERY, MARAMON P.O., KOZHENCHERRY. 7. VINOD, CHENGANNUR THRICHITATTU MAHAVISHNU TEMPLE, CHENGANNUR, RESIDING AT KARTHIKA NIVAS, KODAYATTUKARA, CHENGANNUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.M.CHARISMA R6 BY ADVS. SRI.V.MANOJ KUMAR SRI.IYPE JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 34560 of 2009(L) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX --------------- PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------------------ EXT.P1. COPY OF THE F.I.R. WAS REGISTERED AS CRIME NO.860/2009 DATED 11.11.2009 OF CHEGANNUR POLICE STATION. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE EPRESENATION DATED 30.11.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO RESPONDENTS 1 - 7. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL ------------------------------------- / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK R.BASANT & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) NO: 34560 OF 2009 L ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd March, 2011. JUDGMENT Basant, J. This petition filed as early as on 1-12-2009 seeking police protection remains without disposal even now. The matter had come up on 1-12-2009 and interim order was passed by the Court. After 8-12-2009 there has been no further posting of the case. Respondents though served have not chosen to enter appearance. Today when the case is called, there is no appearance for the petitioner. It is evident that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition. This petition is accordingly dismissed. R.BASANT Judge K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj 2