IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-6322 of 2010 Date of Decision: April 29, 2010 Davinder Kaur .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.279 dated 8.12.2009, under Sections 406, 407, 409, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 477, 120-B IPC, registered with Police Station, Sadar, Ferozepur. Learned counsel for the respondent- State, on instructions from Gurbhej Singh, Inspector, states that the petitioner has joined investigation and is not required for further Crl. Misc. No. M-6322 of 2010 [2] interrogation. Final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has already been filed. Considering the stand of the respondent-State, the petition is allowed. Order dated 4.3.2010 is hereby made absolute and it is directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer, subject to the following conditions:- “(i) The petitioner shall make herself available for inter- rogation as and when required; (ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person ac- quainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and (iii) The petitioner shall not leave India without the pre- vious permission of the Court.” The petitioner is directed to seek regular bail within three weeks from today, as the challan has already been filed. (AJAI LAMBA) April 29, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?