Petitioner Tikori; Slo Vanshraj‘ 53 yrs. Dealer cum Dresser. S.E.C,L. West Jhagadakhand ' Coniery. Hasdeo Area Distt. Kcriya (C.G.) Versus Respondenis 1. Scum Easham Coat Fields Ltd. Through: The C.M.D. S.E.C.L. Seepat Raad. Biiaspur (C.G.). 2. - The Chief Genera Manager, S.E.C.L. Jhagadakhand Colliery. Hasdeo Area Distt. Ko’riya (C.G.) The Area Manager; West Jhagdakhand Colliery. Hasdeo Area Disu. Koriya (ca) HIGH COURT OE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP. (Si No. 1767 of 2007 ' SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Shri Prafuii Bharat, Advocate for me petilioner. shri Vmod Deshmukh, Advocate for the respondena ORDER ( Passed on this 23“ day or March, 2007) The following order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihom, J. 1. Leamed 'counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that without any ‘ documeniary evidence or any other basis. the date of birth of the petitioner was recorded in the service book‘ as 1.4.1946. On coming to know that the date of birth. so recorded in the service book is not correct and contrary to the date of birth recorded in the schooi leaving certificate. the petitioner made a representation to the concerned authority of the respondents-8.E.C.L. The respondentlaud'lority has not taken any steps, as yet. on the representation of the petitioner. for correcting the date of birth. ' 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there is a provision for resolving of dispute with regard to the date of birth of the employees of the S.E.C.L. y the Age Determination Committee, which b has been constitutedunder Clause C of the N.C.W.A.(m). It is next submitted that the respondents/authority be directed to refer the matter ’ to the Age Determination Committee for adjudication of the dispute with regard to the date of birth of the petitioner, to which teamed counsel appearing for the respondents has no‘objection. The petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents that the matter be referred to the Age Determination Committee for determination of the age of the petitioner, in accordance - with iaw. as 'expeditioueiy as possibie, preferably within a period of six ‘ weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. l l l Sdl- l j Satish K.Agnihotri l Judge . l l