IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16924 of 2011 Teni Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 24.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 105 of 2010 registered under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner that the petitioner alongwith others killed the husband of the informant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there was land dispute from before resulted into false implication of the petitioner. The charge sheet has already been submitted in the matter. This court is not inclined to interfere. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day if possible, considering the aforesaid submissions made 2 by the learned counsel for the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned S.D.J.M., Sherghati, Gaya, in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 105 of 2010 at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)