C482 No.10/2004 Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate for the revisionist. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State. By way of this revision, the judgment and order of conviction, concurrently held by trial court as well that of lower appellate court, is under challenge. This judgment pertains to the offence u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Complainant Gulab Singh has not been impleaded as opposite party, though he is a necessary party required to be heard. As such, revisionist is directed to implead the complainant as opposite party and to file amended memo of revision within a week. Soon thereafter, the steps shall be taken for effecting service upon the newly impleaded opposite party by the revisionist. List after service report. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 15.09.2011 Rdang