IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATrISGARH AT BILASPUR «LGJ WRIT APPEAL No. Q 6% Izoos PR. No. 6206/2008 b APPELLANTS 1. Santosh Kumar Ratre S/o Bhikhu Ratre, aged about 25 years, R/o— ViHage— Khamriya, Tahsil Mungeli, - District- Bilaspur (C.G.). (petitioner no. 4 in writ petition) 2. Tushar Manu S/o- Shivdas Manu, aged about 31 years, R/o— Behind Amar Gas Godown, Magarpara, District— Biiaspur (C.G.) (petitioner no. 8 in writ petition) ~ Adarsh Khandekar S/o- Atma Ram Khadekar, aged about 28 years, R/o- Village- Phoolwari, Post— Birrgaon, Tahsil— Mungeli, District— Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. (petitioner no. 9 in writ petition) 4. Samman Lal Thakur S/o— Laxman Lai Thakur, aged about 23 years, R/o— C.S.E.B. Colony, behind Hanuman Mandir Tifra, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). (petitioner no. 14 in writ petition) Sandeep Kaushik S/o- C.L. Kaushik, aged about 33 years, R/o- Shivnath Jarhabhatha, Marg, Om Nagar, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). (petitioner no. 18 in writ petition) 6. Vinay Kumar Kosle S/o-_ Devsukha Kosle, aged about 25 years, R/o— Village& Post- Singari, Ratanpur, District— Bilaspur (C.G.). (petitioner no. 19 in writ petition) Subhash Singh Parte S/o— Bharat Singh Parte, aged about 3O years, R/o— Deori—khurd, near Power house, District~ Bilaspur (C.G.). (petitioner no. 21 in writ petition) Swapnil Roy S/o— S. K. Roy aged about 27 years, R/o— Village & Post— Lakhram, Ratanpur, District— Bilaspur (C.G.). (petitioner no. 24 in writ petition) Neelkanth Kaushik S/o-Janak Ram Kaushik, aged about 28 years, R/o-. Nayapara (Bodri), Chakrabhatha Camp. District— Bilaspur (C.G.). (petitioner no. 26 in writ petition) Sanjay Kumar Verma S/o- Shri Ram Kumar Verma, aged about 28 years, R/o- Village & Post Semartal, District— Bilaspur (C.G.). (petitioner no. 27 in writ petition) Ashwani Yadav S/o- Ramsharan Yadav, aged about 24 years, R/o— Near National Garage, Maharshi 'School, Rajendra Nagar, District— Bilaspur (C.G.). (petitioner no. 32 in writ petition) Ravindra Kashyap S/o~ P.N. Kashyap, aged about 36 years, R/o- Rajendra Nagar, District— Bilaspur (C.G.). 10. 11. 12. (petitioner no. 33 in writ petition) 13. Prakash Patel S/o— S.L.Patei, aged about 30 years, R/o- Siddhi Sadan, Indira Coiony, Tarbahar, District~ Biiaspur (C.G.). (petitioner no. 38 in writ petition) 14. Rajesh Kaushik S/o— Ganga Prasad Kaushik, aged about 30 years, R/o- Village~ Nagpura, Post— Sirgitti, District— Biiaspur (C.G.). (petitioner no. 45 in writ petition) 15. Nand Kumar Kaushik S/o— Shravan Kaushik aged about 3O years, R/o- Village & Post Sewar, Tahsil- Bilha, District- Biiaspur (C.G.). (petitioner no. 47 in writ petition) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The commissioner, Land Rcord, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Coiiector, Land Record, Biiaspur (C.G.) 4. _,The Chhattisgarh Board of Professional Examination,Through the Controlier, Raipur (C.G.) 5. Ramesh Kumar Kaushik S/o~ S. R. Kaushik, aged about 36 years, R/o- Near Maharana Pratap Chowk, Devi Nagar Biiaspur,» District- Biiaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no. 1 in the writ petition). 6. Mukesh Kumar Pandey S/o- Late Lakhan Lal Pandey, aged about 31 years, R/o- Biock Road Behind Omimeel, Tahsil~ Takhatpur, District— Biiaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no. 2 in the writ petition). Harish Chandra Jain S/o— Shikhar Chand Jain, aged about 26 years, R/o- Oid Sarkanda, Near Mata Choura, Bihi Badi, Biiaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no. 3 in the writ petition). 8. Abid Mohammad Ansari S/o— Moh. Khadim Ansari, aged about 35 years, , R/o- Near Masjid Takhatpur, Tahsil- Takhatpur, District- Biiaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no. 5 in the writ petition). 9. Dhanendra Kumar Dewangan S/o- Narayan Prasad Dewangan, aged about 28 years, R/o- 8/9 Mahaiaxmi Mandir, Patwapara, Takhatpur, Tahsil- Takhatpur, District— Biiaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no. 6 in the writ petition). Chandan Lal Anant S/o- Sudheram Ananat, aged about 35 years, R/o- Mission Compound, Tahsii— Takhatpr, District- Biiaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no. 7 in the writ petition). - 11. Surjit Singh Thakur S/o- Ganesh Singh ‘Thakur, aged about 34 years, R/o- care of Modi Halwai, Near’Shiv-x ‘10. "‘(, gmv, g! u ‘ Mandir, Tirthani Gan, New Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District— Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.10 in the writ petition) Smt. Rajni Dewangan W/o— Manoj Dewangan, aged about 32 years, R/o- Care of Sharda Typing and Photocopy center, opposite Manohar Talkies, Bilaspur, District— Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.11 in the writ petition) Phool Chand Dhruv S/o— Johit ram Dhruv, aged about 28 years, R/o- Viilage- Malakchhari, P.O.— Dindori, Tahsii- Lormi, District— Biiaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.12 in the writ petition) Rajman Singh Porte S/o- Akal Singh Porte, aged about 28 years, R/o— Village- Sekhwa, P.O.- Kotmi (Pendra) District— Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.13 in the writ petition) Mukesh Sahu S/o— Saiiram Sahu, aged about 31 years, R/o- Near Jain Tent House Kududand, District— Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.15 in the writ petition) Ramsharan Sahu S/o- B. R. Sahu, aged about 33 years, R/o— Bangaiipara, Gali No. 4, Sarkanda, Biiaspuur, District— Biiaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.16 in the writ petition) Ramnarayan Kashyap S/o— Dhaniram Kashyap, aged about 31 years, R/o¥ 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. A YWH ,A C/o— R. N. Sahu, Bangalipara, Gali No. 4 Sarkanda, District— Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.17 in the writ petition) 18. Bhagvat Prasad Upadhyay S/o- S. K. D. Upadhyay, aged about 31 years, R/o- Jail Line ( Central) Bilaspur, Districte Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.20 in the writ petition) 19. Kumari Rubi Das D/o- P. Das, aged about 22 years, R/o- Mission Compound, Takhatpur, District- Biiaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.22 in the writ petition) 20. Praveen Rajput S/o— Vijay Rajput, aged about 26 years, R/o- Saroda Nagar, Paii, District- Korba (C.G.) (Petitioner no.23 in the writ petition) 21. Sharad Sharma S/o- Bhagvar Prasad Sharma, aged about 26 years, R/o- Village & Post Sakri, District— Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.25 in the writ petition) 22. Hemant Sahu S/o- R.~P. Sahu, aged about 30 years, R/o- Sahu Bhawan, Chhatterji Gali, New Sarkanda, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.28 in the writ petition) 23. Rakesh Sharma S/o- Vinay Mohan Sharma, aged about 28 years, R/o— opposite shri .Ram Kripa Niwas, Nariyal Kothi, Dayalband, District— Bilaspur (C.G.) ?’1 ‘ (Petitioner no.29 in the writ petition) 24. Virendra Kumar Patanwar S/o— Thakur Prasad Patanwar, aged about 30 years, R/o- Jabra Road, Sarkanda, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.30 in the writ petition) Aniruddh Kumar Patanwar S/o— Lekhram Patanwar,’ aged about 27 years, R/o- Plot No. 64, Panchmukhi Hanuman Mandir, Rajkishore Nagar, District— Biiaspur (C.G.) 25. (Petitioner no.31 in the writ petition) 26. Yogesh Pandey S/o- K. P. Pandey, aged about 30 years, R/o- Near Santoshi Mandir, Chantidih, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.34 in the writ petition) 27. Manoj Barman S/o- Ramsujan Barman, aged about 35 years, R/o- Makan Number 1/95, Chandan Awas Rajkishore Nagar, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.35 in the writ petition) 28. Rajesh Kashyap S/o- Khelanram Kashyap, aged about 35 years, R/o- Rajabadapara, Lormi, District- Biiaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.36 in the writ petition) 29. Dhirendra Kashyap S/o- Shiv Shankar Kashyap, aged about 30 years, R/o- .Kushwaha Bhawan, Shankar Nagar, Chhuchhuiya Para, District— Bilaspur (C.G.) ‘ @ (Petitioner no.37 in the writ petition) Budheshwar Soni S/o- Mathura Prasad Soni, aged about 24 years, R/o— Near S. Laxman Bhawan, Kapii Nagar, New Sarkanda, District— Biiaspur (C.G.) ‘ (Petitioner no.39 in the writ petition) Vijay Singh Marko S/o- Ganpat Singh Marko, aged about 30 years, R/o— P.O. Ushad, Village- Marwahi, Tahsii— Marwahi, District— Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.40 in the writ petition) Bhuwan Lal Patel S/o- Dinanath Patei, aged about 33 years, R/o— P.O. Manikchouri, Tahsil~ Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.41 in the writ petition) ‘ Ram Manohar Kaushik S/o- Ramgopal Kaushik, aged about 30 years, R/o— Village- Dewari, P.O. Dhooma, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.42 in the writ petition) Manish Kumar Tamboli S/o- Vinod Kumar Tamboli, aged about 26 years, R/o- Near Shanti Lodge,>Juna Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.43 in the writ petition) Khilawan Sahu S/o- Santram Sahu, aged about 30 years, R/o— Nayapara, Kirti Nagar, Santoshi Chowk, Bilaspur, District: Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.44 inrthe writ petition) Mukesh Pandey S/o— Late Sh‘ri ’ 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. . ta \ 35. 36. Neejanand Pandey, aged about 29 years, R/o— Village & Post Karhi, Tahsil- Mungeli, District— Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.46 in the writ petition) Sarvesh Trivedi S/o- Kripashankar Trivedi, aged about 27 years, R/o- Behind Chhattisgarh High Court, Diprapara, District— Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.48 in the writ petition) 38. Pankar Tiwari S/o- Narndra Kumar Tiwari, aged about 24 years, R/o— 37. Behind Kurmi Hostel, Seepat Road, i Chantidih, Bilaspur, District— Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.49 in the writ petition) Somanath Patel S/o Ghansiram Patel, aged about 24 years, R/o- Behind Gurudwara, Vikas Nagar, 27 Kholi, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (Petitioner no.50 in the writ petition) 39. WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 OF CHHA1TISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH) RULES 2006. l xv ,i t HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT APPEAL No. 262 OF 2008 APPELLANTS Santosh Kumar Ratre and others Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others DB:- HON’BLE SHRI I.M. QUDDUSI 85 HON’BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, JJ PRESENT :- Shri F.S. Khare, Advocate for the appellants. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adv. General for the State. Shri Sameer Behar, Adv. for respondent No. 4. ORAL ORDER (29—6—2010) l. Heard. 2. This writ appeal has been filed against the order dated 4-9—2008 passed in W.P.(S) No. 4870/2008 whereby learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition. 3. The writ appellants were selected for the post of Patwari in the year 2005. Life of the selection list is one year as per the Land Record Manual. The said waiting list lapsed after a period of one year, however they were sent for training. Now the new process for selection vide advertisement dated 27—8-2008 has been initiated, by the respondents, as per which, in case the writ appellants appear in the examination and get success, their further training will be exempted. 4. In View of the above, no illegality appears to be committed'by the respondents in issuing advertisement dated 27-8-2008. The learned Single Judge has rightly dismissed the petition and we are not inclined to interfere in the impugned order. 5. The writ appeal is dismissed. Sd/- Sdl- I.M.Quddusi v l N. K. Agarwa‘ Judge r r x Judge '‘tn/r 4“,‘ i