WP(C) 4909/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. J.I. Barbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner who seeks considera tion for compassionate appointment following the death of his father on 1.3.07 w hile serving as a Peon in the Office of District Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Deptt. Guwahati-3. It is submitted that the petitioner applied for consideratio n soon after the death of his father but as the said application was misplaced, subsequently another application was filed on 29.6.08 before the respondents. Bu t it is alleged that the same is yet to be placed for consideration by the compe tent committee constituted for the purpose of considering such claims. It is submitted that the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment sh ould be considered by the committee in light of the decision of this Court in Ac hyut Ranjan Das vs. State of Assam reported in 2006(4) GLT 674 and in the light of the Govt. policy. Mr BJ Ghosh, learned Govt Advocate has no objection if the case of the petitioner is considered by the competent committee in light of the policy and the Court’s decision. In view of the above agreement amongst the counsels this case is disposed of at this stage by directing that the respondents would take necessary steps to ensur e consideration of the petitioner’s claim for compassionate appointment in terms of the judgment of this court in Achyut Ranjan Das (Supra). This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.