IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No. 776 of 1995 Date of Decision: July 12, 2011 Bhag Singh ….Petitioner Versus Gurdial Singh and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: None. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) I have gone through the record. The brief facts of the present case are that petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction before the Civil Court, Rajpura, and learned Additional Senior Sub Judge has ordered to maintain status quo regarding possession vide order dated 03.06.1995. Thereafter, respondent No.1, who was having close relations with the police, had called the petitioner into police station and he was given a severe beating on 06.06.1995 and 01.07.1995. COCP No.776 of 1995 In the opinion of this Court, petitioner is always at liberty to take appropriate action as per Penal Code. I am not inclined to invoke contempt jurisdiction merely on the saying of the petitioner. Prima facie, case under the contempt of Court Act is not made out, as per the contention raised in the petition. Present petition is dismissed. July 12, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2