Crl.M. No. M-861 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1) Crl.M. No. M-861 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 17.2.2011 ... Bikram Sharma @ Vikram ................Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent 2) Crl.M. No. M-3446 of 2011 (O&M) ... Manpreet Singh @ Dabbu ................Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. D.B. Singh, Advocate for the petitioners Sh. S. S. Bhinder, Senior Additional Advocate General with Sh. A.S. Rai, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. ... K.C. Puri, J. Vide this order, I intend to dispose of Crl.M.Nos. M-861 of 2011 and M-3446 of 2011, as both the petitions arise out of same FIR. Bikram Sharma @ Vikram and Manpreet Singh @ Dabbu – Crl.M. No. M-861 of 2011 -2- petitioners have applied for grant of regular bail in FIR No. 25 dated 4.2.2010 under Sections 363, 366, 34 IPC (Section 376 IPC added later on), registered at Police Station Division No.2, Ludhiana. Shanker Sood @ Shanky had applied for grant of regular bail vide Crl. M. No. M-34631 of 2010 and his application was allowed on the ground that prosecutrix and her parents have not made any allegation against any of the accused. From the perusal of the file, it is revealed that previously also that fact was admitted. Now, even today, it is admitted by the State counsel that prosecutrix and her parents have not supported the case of the prosecution. So, the application of both the applicant-petitioners stands accepted. Bail is granted to both the applicant-petitioners, to the satisfaction of the trial Court. ( K.C. Puri ) 17.2.2011 Judge chugh