IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1363 of 2010 In (CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 15538/2009) Atwari Das Son of Late Sukhdeo Das Mukhiya cum Chairman Panchayat Teachers Appointment Unit, Gram Panchayat Raj Shabda Under Block Falka, P.S. Falka, P.O. Pothia, District-Katihar. ---------------Petitioner/Appellant. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, Primary Education Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Katihar. 4. The District Superintendent of Education Katihar. 5. The Member, District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Katihar. 6. The Block Development Officer, Falka, Katihar. 7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Falka, Katihar. 8. Smt. Rajmani Rani Wife of Sri Lal Mandal Resident of Village & P.O. Mehndi Via Bhawanipur Aajdham, P.S. Tikapatti, District-Purnea. ------------------Respondents ---------------------------------- 2. 18.08.2011 None appears on behalf of the appellant when the case is called out. However, Mr. Harish Kumar learned A.C. to A.A.G. 10 for the official respondents is present. The present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed against the order dated 22.7.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 15538 of 2009 (Atwari Das Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The grievance of the writ petitioner/appellant who was the Mukhiya-cum- 2 Chairman of Gram Panchayat Raj, Falka, Katihar was that the appellate authority had allowed the appeal filed by the private respondent by which the writ petitioner had been directed to consider the application of the private respondent for appointment on the post of Panchayat Teacher after due enquiry. It appears from the pleading that the writ petitioner who is also the present appellant resisted complying with the said order on more than one occasion and finally filed a petition before the appellate authority that he would be moving the High Court against such order passed by the appellate tribunal. This Court after hearing the parties and after noticing the facts and considering the merit was pleased to dismiss the writ application holding that the order passed by the appellate authority was binding on the writ petitioner and there was therefore no justification to interfere. The present appeal has been filed against the said order of dismissal by the learned Single Judge. After hearing learned counsel for the State and after going through the reasons assigned in the order under appeal we are in full agreement with the order passed and the reason assigned and therefore, find no reason to interfere with the same. 3 Accordingly this appeal stands dismissed. Anand Kr. (S. K. Katriar, J.) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)