IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.5243 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 1.11.2010 Union of India ......Petitioner(s) Versus Sunitra and others ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. O.S. Batalvi, Advocate for the petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral) As per the averments made in this petition, a decree dated 31.1.2008 was passed in favour of respondents No.1 to 4 and against the Union of India through the Ministry of Defence, Govt. of India, New Delhi. In execution proceedings of the aforesaid decree, the Executing Court vide its order dated 9.7.2010, ordered the attachment of the vehicles belonging to the petitioner-Department. The application filed by the petitioner-Department for release of the aforesaid vehicles was partly rejected. Challenging the aforesaid order dated 9.7.2010, the present petition was filed. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner-Department has not disputed the execution of the decree on merits of the case but has submitted that the vehicles belonging to entirely a different Department of the Govt. of India were attached. However, Mr. Anil Rathee, Advocate, who is representing respondents No.5 to 8 i.e. Union of India, through the Ministry of Defence, has stated before this Court on 20.9.2010 that the decree in question was to be satisfied by respondents No.5 to 8. CR No.5243 of 2010 (O&M) -2- On 14.10.2010, Mr. Rathee, had stated before this Court that an amount of Rs.85,530/- has already been deposited in the account of Karambir, son of the deceased in satisfaction of the decree. However, respondents No.1 to 4 had taken a stand that the decree was not satisfied fully, as interest was not paid. Today, Mr. Rathee, Advocate has submitted that the amount in respect of the interest on the principal amount shall be paid/deposited in the account of Karambir Singh, son of the deceased, within one month from today. In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the learned counsel for the parties, the impugned order dated 9.7.2010 is set aside. The revision petition is allowed. November 1, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE