IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52589 of 2008 1. AJAY KUMAR S/O SRI BAIDYA NATH SAH. 2. BIRENDRA KUMAR @ BIRENDRA RAI, S/O BISHUN DEO ROY. 3. BALAVANT KUMAR CHOUDHARY @ BALWANT CHOUDHARY, S/O LATE GULZARI CHOUDHARY, ALL RESIDENT OF SERPUR, P.S. VIDYAPATI NAGAR, DISTT. SAMASTIPUR. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.4.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The offence alleged against the petitioners, who are apprehending their arrest in a police case, is under sections 151, 153 and 174 of the Indian Railways Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the specific allegation is not against petitioners no.2 and 3. However, false allegation has been alleged against petitioner no.1. The learned counsel for the State submits that there is specific allegation against petitioner no.1 of committing the alleged offence. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioners no.2 and 3 above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Barauni Rail P.S. Case No.26/08, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Barauni (Begusarai), in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of 2 the Code of Criminal Procedure. So far as the prayer for bail made on behalf of petitioner no.1 Ajay Kumar is concerned, in the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to release him on bail. His prayer for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)