IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26270 of 2011 Ajit Singh son of Basukinath Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 10.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 406, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is the employee of Gammon India and a dispute arose between the petitioner who was store keeper and the Informant who is a petty Contractor of GSB, over supply of stone dust for construction of four Lane Highway. Further submission is that Gammon India, the employer of the petitioner has not instituted any case against him as also the allegation is oral and there is no documentary proof that the petitioner has torn out the receipt as alleged. Considering the same as also that the petitioner is in custody since 6.7.2011 having fair antecedents, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with three sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali, in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No. 99 2 of 2011 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, the second bailor shall be the father of the petitioner and third bailor must be local since the petitioner belongs to Bhojpur. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)