THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.360 of 2011 ORDER: This writ petition is filed with the prayer, which reads as under: “For the reasons stated in the above accompanying affidavit, the petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.1 and 2 in not filing the charge sheet by way of detailed investigation in Crime No.87/2010 of P.S.Karempudi, Guntur District, as illegal and arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent Nos.1 & 2 to file the charge sheet in the above crime by taking necessary steps against respondent Nos.3 & 4 including their arrest.” It is the grievance of the petitioner that he has filed a private complaint against respondents 3 and 4 before the learned I-Additional Junior Civil Judge, Gurazala, who in turn, referred the same under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. to the police for investigation. On such reference, a case was registered in Crime No.87 of 2010 on the file of P.S.Karampudi, for the offences under Sections 420, 506, 406, 423 and 424 IPC but no investigation is made by respondents 1 and 2 and respondents 3 and 4 were not apprehended. When the matter came up for admission on 19.01.2011, it was adjourned to enable the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 and 2 to obtain instructions. When the matter is taken up today, based on written instructions, dated 25.01.2011, sent by the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, Karampudi Police Station, Guntur District, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 and 2 that after completion of investigation in Crime No.87 of 2010, final report referring the complaint of the petitioner as civil nature, was filed before the learned I-Additional Junior Civil Judge, Gurazala, on 31.12.2010, by issuing notice to the petitioner/complainant. As much as it is stated that the final report was filed on 31.12.2010, it cannot be said that the respondents have not investigated into the crime on reference made by the learned I-Additional Junior Civil Judge, Gurazala. As much as the final report was filed by giving notice to the petitioner, if he is aggrieved to such report, he may file protest petition or objections, before the learned I- Additional Junior Civil Judge, Gurazala, but no further directions can be issued in this writ petition. Recording the statement made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 and 2 that in Crime No.87 of 2010, the final report was filed before the learned I- Additional Junior Civil Judge, Gurazala, on 31.12.2010, this writ petition is disposed of. If the petitioner is aggrieved by such final report, it is open to him to file objections/protest petition against it. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 28th JANUARY, 2011. kvni