IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2009 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 34296 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SANKARANKUTTY, S/O. VISWANATH, RESIDING IN D.30 NEW CIVIL NAGAR, PALAKKAD, PIN-678001. 2. MALATHY SANKAR, W/O. SANKARNKUTTY, RESIDING IN D.30, NEW CIVIL NAGAR, PALAKKAD PIN-678001. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR SRI.P.BHASKARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, THRISSUR. 3. THE SUB REGISTRAR, PAZHAYANNUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY G.P.SRI. I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J -------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) .NO.34296 OF 2009 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of December, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioners say that they are entitled to the benefit of Ext.P4 circular. Those guidelines prima facie, apply. If there are no circumstances which disentitles the petitioners from claiming the benefit of that circular, I find no ground for the petitioners being deprived of the benefit of Ext. P4 circular and compounding the matter accordingly. The request of the petitioners will therefore be considered by the competent among respondents 2 and 3 and if there is any further confusion about the applicability or availability of the benefit of Ext.P4, the matter will be immediately referred to 1st respondent for decision. Let the whole exercise be completed within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE mns