IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.1978 of 2008 Date of Decision : May 20, 2011. Vijay Kumar .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.S.Manhas, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Bhardwaj, Addl.AG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by his reversion from the post of Work Munshi to Beldar. It is averred that no formal order has been passed or communicated to him but the petitioner is directed to perform his duties on the lower post of Beldar. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record an order dated 6.8.2010 (Annexure A-1) whereby the reversion order of a similarly placed Work Munshi, namely, Rakesh Kumar son of Girdhari who was ordered to be reverted vide order dated 19.5.2003, has been withdrawn and he has been restored to the promotional post of Work Munshi. It thus appears that the petitioner rightly claims parity with Rakesh CWP No.1978 of 2008 [2] Kumar, referred to above. In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the claim of the petitioner for recalling the order of his reversion, if any, passed in the same manner as has been done in the case of Rakesh Kumar, referred to above. An appropriate order on re-consideration of the claim of the petitioner be passed within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 20, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE