3%? 9/6; HIGH COURT OF JUDIGATURE GHHA1TI$6ARH : BILASP”R sINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHRI SR. NAYAK, OJ. WRIT PErmou (c) mm ¢Fm Smt. Abh Thamr, wif o Shti Chandr Pre Sing Thkur n uter f h C.S. Thakur, age b 2 ya, resien of Takhatpur, Dsstri Bitaspur (ca) Vs. 1. State of Chhattisgarh Thmug tha Genera Administrio Dartment Mntralaya DKS Bhawan, Raipur. The oilector. Kawaidha, District Kabiidham. 3. The Superintendent of Poiice, Kawardha. Distrie Kabirdham. 4. The Station ous Offic, olice Station Kawardha, istrict Kabirdham. PETmONER He er P D Present : Ms. Madhu Modi; learned counsei for he petitine. t or Shri Sanjay S. Agrawai, leared G.A. or the respondent. n f s ORAL (Passed on 10 er, 2006) The petitioner is a complainant in ime N.5l06 registered unde Section 498-A read with Section 34'0 the Indian ena Code andrthe case is - pending on the frle of the Court of teamed Additional Session JuQe, bircha (Kawardha). it appears that the warrant issued against the accusedliawsf the petitioner are not yet executed. in the circumstance, this writ petitio is tiled for a direction to the respondents authorities to ake immediat teps o xecute the warrants of arrest issued against th accusedfrn—iaws of he petitioner. i h warrants are not yet executed on account of any apse of h arecuti authorities, it could be brought to the notice of the Court for approriat ireaion. Reserving liberty to do so, the writ petition i ismissed; No costs. . s Kam Sdl- Chief Juce a e f a at h a ad dagh o Srl d acut 5 ers dt ct h l atn ep, a, C t ORDER m Novmbe Cr o15 r f Pl s in-‘o ’ n t e s t e e t f te l te ng pe d s d sti