IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16437 of 2010 MD.NAUSAD ALAM, SON OF MUMTAZUL HAQUE Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner was refused bail earlier by an order dated 16.9.2009 vide Cr. Misc. 29314 of 2009 stating that the petitioner has 17 cases to his credit, I am not inclined to review the said order. The prayer for bail is once again rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it positively by nine months in view of the serious nature of the offence. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)