IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14258 of 2011 ARVIND KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 13.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in custody since 23.03.2011 in a case registered under Sections 323, 406 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is that he was running some Computer Education Institute for which franchise was given to the informant on promise to make payment of Rs. 40,000/- as royalty, the informant had to collect Rs. 1580/- per student from 160 students regularly for 15 months. It is submitted that petitioner took Rs. 4,13,000/- for installation of Internet Tower that has also been misappropriated but it is submitted by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that it was the petitioner who breached the contract and other persons have lodged the cases against the informant and subsequently the petitioner's side has also lodged the case against the informant. Moreover, there is no documentary 2 proof with regard to the payments made by the informant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the informant that it was due to the conduct of the petitioner the informant failed to keep up promises to the students which resulted into the lodging of the case by the students against petitioner. Moreover, in one of the such cases the final form has been submitted. Considering the contractual nature of dispute between the parties and period under custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in connection with Bishambharpur P.S. Case No. 61 of 2010, G.R. No. 3101 of 2010. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)