.........5gg£SI ^^'sss^--""" 4 CP" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIIASPUR(CG) '^Lt WRIT PETITION N0. .r?.<^, . . ./ 2006 CIny1<» "Q!; Oiyijiy ysi! Petitioner Respondents Ku. Shraddhawati Kaiwartya, D/o Shri Arjun Lal Kaiwartya , aged about 24 years, R/o village Gadpatni , Post Bansula via- Basana , Distt. Mahasamund (CG) VERSUS l.State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Education Department, D. K. S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) . Director , Public Instructions , Department of Education D. K. S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) 3. District Education Officer, ^ Mahasamund (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/ 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE r^ NATURE OF CERTIRARY MftNDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS , OBDER OFORDERS ETC: XI-HC-22 3i1^T^i1 P;-ii+ sn^i ^iHT* ^fg^T ^ '3^"tll''lld:ii?»flIwi-6yKi<'ii'y^fc. 'xywx!-^ 30 SsSII tiiiwi gi*ncR sn^r -q^p _..M...S^M^ 200 ^t^St' •ffl^r'renw'ofsg 6-2-2006 Bhri R.S. Patei, counsel f<; Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Dj it is notea mat me vaxai^ not.contain the compiete detaiis.1 CM^<vi<fr'r ^Mcflr'^^^ <^'L^.l< ^aPgirsn^r fr the petitioner. ^. Govt. Advocate for the State. itnama nied by the petitioner does Learnea counsei for me petitioner submits that he may be peifrnitted to correci the .same by meniioning the compiete detait4 as per the requirement. Let he may ao so. Heard. Learned counsei for fie petitioner submits that the petitioner's famer, wno was uovernment Knmary bcnooi Mahasamund, died during sei tnereaner tne petitioner app»e| working as Head Master in -Doomarpaii, Bdsna, District •vice period on 30-10-2000 and i for compassionate appointment which was denied: it is furthef' submitted that in bateh of cases bearing VV.P. No.1322/2002 inji/olving the same question orders have been passed by this Coijirt on 20/12/2005. He prays that simiiar oraers may be passed in Learned counsei.ror mel fact and states that the Staie ol mis case also. State does not dlspute the above Chhattisgarh has taken a decision to consider thecases of depenflants ofthose employees who died on or after 1m/1997 strictl'jr in accordance with the poiicy prevaient at mat time. ^ in view of the suDmis appearing tor tne parties, withi .merits ofthecase, in the opinh [sions made by ieamed counsei 3Ut expressing any opinion on the in of this Court, ends ofjustice wili [•^tfigzt XI-HC-22 SII^I'^iT 'ft;-ii<* an^r shtl yf?fl 4fc. Gowl tiiKMWSi&SSS^ 3S[-')]'ill<rttl,5»nlfl"ia,)(clMi'»3,<:a? Sf^t 'tR^ 11HWT *iW*> "I'V^ 2W •f^ST' sii^f •TOnwgf?a z^ be servea it a airectlon is giveni the autnorities concerned to cor petitioner in accordance with tr death of her father. if the petil orderswili be issued as early as| ot four monms. Tne petltionei co-operation to w\e autnonue; gnevance stili remains, tne fl avaiiable under the law includii Court. With tne aroresaia aisposea OT. Certified copy as per ruie< copy to me State communicate the order to the ret ^i^Fd^li ^tnq^f ^ f^s)' •(fsi^n % sS^v sn^i to the State of Chhattisgarh and ksider and decide the case of the lepoiicy prevalent at thetime of lioner found eiigibie, appointment Ipossi&ie preTerably witnin a penoa is also directed to render due \. it is made eiear that if any etitioner may avaii the remea'y ig fiiing of the petition before this obtsen'ations, this petition stends after correctmg the Vakatatnama. ii, who wiil be obiiged to pondents tor compliance. < Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge '<s