C-482 No. 1055 of 2006 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate present for the petitioners. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder present for respondent No. 1 / State. Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Advocate present for respondent No. 2 Smt. Sarika. Petitioner No. 2 Vishwa Jeet (husband) and respondent No. 2 Smt. Sarika (wife) are present in person before this Court. Heard. By means of this petition, moved under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioners have sought quashing of the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 448 of 2006, State / Sarika Vs. Viswa Jeet and others, relating to offences punishable under Section 323, 324, 504, 506 of I.P.C., pending in the court of First Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division ) / Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. Also, the order dated 16.10.2006, passed by the Sessions Judge, Haridwar, in Criminal Revision No. 218 of 2006, is sought to be quashed, whereby the summoning order passed by the trial court, was not interfered with. Today parties to the matrimony, namely Vishwa Jeet (husband / petitioner No. 2) and respondent No. 2 Smt. Sarika (wife) have entered into a compromise in the Court. Details of the terms of compromise are mentioned in the order passed today by this Court in Criminal Misc. Application (C-482) No. 237 of 2003. In view of the compromise entered into between the parties, now, Smt. Sarika respondent No. 2 / complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioners. Therefore, in view of the principle of law laid down in B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; (2003) 4 Supreme Court Cases 675, and considering the fact that parties to the matrimony have amicably settled the dispute, this petition deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, the petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is allowed. Entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 448 of 2006, State / Sarika Vs. Vishwa Jeet and others, relating to offences punishable under Section 323, 324, 504, 506 of I.P.C., police station Jawalapur, pending in the court of First Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division) / Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar, are hereby quashed. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 19.04.2010 HN