IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3969 of 2011 SATYENDRA GUPTA @ SATYENDRA PRASAD GUPTA @ ARUN KUMAR GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Prosecutor for the State. It would appear from perusal of the First Information Report that the informant has not seen the actual killing of the deceased. The learned Additional Sessions Judge has referred paras 14, 15, 38 and 41 of the case diary, but submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that paras 38, 41 and 48 of the case diary do not contain the statement of any witness and so far as para 14 and 15 are concerned, the witnesses of the aforesaid paragraphs are not the eye witness of the alleged occurrence. Taking into consideration the above stated facts as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Satyendra Gupta @ Satyendra Prasad Gupta @ Arun Kumar Gupta be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Fast Track Court No.8, Purnia in connection with Sessions Trial No.1459 of 2010 arising out of Banmankhi P.S. Case No.81 of 1998. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)