{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1974 OF 2010 1. Mohammad Ilias @ Munna Rais Shah Age-30 years, Occ-Business R/o 80 Ft Road, Near Subhani Masjid Dhule, Dist-Dhule 2. Jameer Ulla s/o Mohammad Khalil Shah Age-38 years, Occ-Business R/o 80 Ft Road, Near Subhani Masjid Dhule, Dist-Dhule APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra Through Police Inspector, Azad Nagar Police Station, Dhule RESPONDENT ....... Mr. R.S.Shinde, Advocate for the applicants Mr. P.P.More, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 8th June 2010 PER COURT: 1. By the present application, the applicants have prayed to release them on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in connection with CR No.92/2010 registered with Azadnagar police {2} station, Dhule for an offence punishable u/s 143 to 149, 325, 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants followed by learned APP and perused the papers of investigation carried out till today. 3. It appears that CR No.93/2010 is registered against the present complainant by present applicant No.2. According to learned counsel for the applicants, due to political pressure from the father of the complainant CR No.92/2010 is registered to give counter blast to the offence registered at CR No.93/2010 which is registered at the instance of applicant No.2. Apart from it, CR No. 92/2010 came to be registered against in all 8 persons in respect of an incident which had occurred at 4.00 p.m. near R.C.Patel School on 16th March 2010. According to learned counsel for the applicants, applicant No.1 was not present at the spot of alleged incident at the relevant time, as he was present before the First Joint Court, Dhule in connection with bail application moved by some 14 persons and in that connection an application was also moved before the Sub Inspector of Police, Azadnagar police station Dhule by the said 14 persons and the said application is also supported by the signatures of the police personnels who were present in the Court on that day. According to learned counsel for the applicants though at the time of the alleged incident the applicant No.1 as present in the Court, his name is falsely {3} implicated along with others in the said offence. 4. On perusal of the papers of investigation, particularly complaint and statements of eye witnesses it is clear that no specific overtact or any act is attributed to the present applicants. Thus, the allegations against the applicants are omnibus. In the premise, case is made out to enlarge the applicants on anticipatory bail by exercising extra ordinary jurisdiction vested in this Court. 5. In the result, the application is allowed. In the event of the arrest of the applicants in connection with CR No.92/2010 registered with Azan, they be released on bail on their furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each and on executing PR bonds in the like amount. The applicants are directed not to contact or tamper with the prosecution witnesses. This protection is granted to the applicants till filing of the charge sheet. The applicants may apply for regular bail after filing of the charge sheet, if they are so advised. Application stands disposed of accordingly. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/criapln1974-10