IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH C.C. No.1176 of 2011 Between: Akkapalli Bapu … Petitioner and Sri Jacob Kispotta, Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force Unit, Unit at NALCO, Damanjodi, Koraput District, Orissa – 763 008. … Respondent THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH C.C. No.1176 of 2011 ORDER: This contempt case has been filed seeking to punish the respondent, contemnor, under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act as the respondent deliberately and intentionally disobeyed the order passed by this Court in W.P. No.16122 of 2000 on 09.12.2003. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner filed W.P. No.16122 of 2000 questioning the termination order dated 08.10.1999 passed by the 2nd respondent, Deputy Inspector General, therein that was confirmed by the 1st respondent, Inspector General, therein vide his order dated 09.02.2000. This Court by order dated 09.12.2003, while setting aside the order of termination, allowed the said writ petition with the direction to the respondents therein to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits including back wages, increments etc., forthwith. Aggrieved by the same, the department preferred an appeal in W.A. No.645 of 2004 and the said appeal was dismissed vide judgment dated 14.07.2010. Assailing the same, S.L.P. No.1959 of 2011 has been preferred and the same was also dismissed by the Apex Court on 11.02.2011. Thereafter, the petitioner was reinstated into service vide Proceedings dated 07.03.2011 and he joined in service on 28.03.2011 and also paid monetary benefits an amount of Rs.11,19,472/- towards arrears. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is entitled to more than twenty lakhs and whereas he received an amount of Rs.11,19,472/-. Therefore, he made a representation dated 16.04.2011 and 28.05.2011, claiming the special increments and to furnish the particulars of the calculation of the salary and allowances and other payments from November, 1999 to 28.03.2011, respectively. The said information has not been furnished, so as to enable him to know what is the mode of calculation applied by them and arrived at a figure that was paid to him. The learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the order passed by this Court has been complied with by issuing the order of reinstatement and by paying the necessary monetary benefits to the petitioner. Therefore, the provisions under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act do not attract and this contempt case may be dismissed. Having regard to the averments made in the contempt case and according to the petitioner he is entitled to more than twenty lakhs of rupees towards monetary benefits but whereas he was paid only Rs.11,19.472/-. Having not satisfied with the said figures, he made a representation, seeking to furnish the particulars of payments made to him, which was not furnished to him. In that view of the matter, as the petitioner was already permitted to join duty and paid certain amounts, it cannot be said that the respondent has disobeyed the order passed by this Court and moreover, there is substantial compliance of the order passed by this Court. The plea that has been taken by the petitioner with regard to difference of amount is only a question of fact in respect of which what is the amount he is entitled to and whether the amount paid by the respondent to the petitioner is correct or not cannot be gone into this contempt case. Therefore, the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this contempt case is dismissed. However, it is needless to observe that it is open for the petitioner to pursue the matter based on the representation stated to have already been made by him. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH Date: 06.09.2011 LSK