C9 Q) _ $IN€§LE BENCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF BILASPUR AT CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION (S) No. K 9 H OF 2010 RESPONDENTS :1. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, S/o. late Shri M. L. Pathak, aged about 44 years, Occupation Service (Vyyam Shikshak), Govt. Higher Secondaly School, Kharainara, Block Kartala, Distt. Korba, (C. G.) 2. ' Nand Kishore Sharma, S/o. late Shri Chhedi Lal Sharma, aged about r46 years, Occupation Service (Vyyam Shikshak), Govt. Higher Secondary School Dipka, Distt. Korba, (C. G.) VERSUS 2 l) '/ State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Tribal and Welfare Department, D. K. S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C. G.) 2) Commissioner, Directorate of Public Instruction Chhattisgarh D K S Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur (C G) 3) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONERS mm W gambn “ 11120 ‘mm (W) mmm WW wW %s‘r&maa1%3r ii 3hrivast-‘va J. SB : hon isié 3rl’ri Marxiim‘ra fvichz £-..s 29£?-2Q10 Shi‘i Ajay Kumar Bafik, coun Ms. Sangeeia Mishi‘a, Par advance uu'Fiy'. Griéva'nce o: me petiiiciiers peuuoners have beéome eiigibie i post of Leetm‘er, pursuani if; mam Bii‘ecior, Pubiic instruciiom. Cnn LL omidenti-‘i RepOits were $ent f0!“ r‘r‘uoiioi‘ has been iakeii, iii: date. Lea...eti céun$ei coriiruuinq m gen/ice as $p01i$ T pi‘OCéSS fOi' gram ul pmmGiicn was Same has; mi been brought 'ro ir3l A i :u -35.: the upetitionere eubrnite far _; -t- . -- .- sei fer ihe petitioners. ei La.—yen“ for the -u as set out in mis petition is that mougii the or being considered for promotion to the 3 ciateci 26i68i20‘68 (Annexure W3) of the attisgari'u, petitioners: ciet-aiis anti nnnuau ,. a con3idei‘ation, no deci3ion with regard r0 0 "Ci mm peiiiicméi'S and ‘ven ihougi‘i aacher since "$91 initiated in the rnontn of August, 2808, tne icai conciugion. 1e nature of coniroversv invoiveoi in this Taking into consirieration, peiiiion, it wouid be appr‘apri’ie io direci respona‘ents i0 consider rm} mLateirespcntients on LL LL - ') it( rF (D L A -g- and take decision on the -i .rn\ Sdl— representations (Annexure F-‘l5 an ‘ Annexure earne, in accor‘oance with iaw, wim n a With the awresaici observati n3} the petition iS eninaiav i dispoeeéi oft“. Manindra Mohan Shrivastava reasonabie period. 6