IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 7TH JULY 2008 / 16TH ASHADHA 1930 RP.No. 691 of 2008() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN CMA.204/1997 Dated 22/09/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS ------------------------------ 1. BALAKRISHNA PILLAI, S/O.PARAMESWARAN PILLAI, VELUTHEDATH, CHOORAKADU KARA, KIZHAKKAMBALAM. 2. RADHAMANI AMMA, W/O.BALAKRISHNAN PILLAI, KIZHAKKEDATHU VEEDU, -DO- -DO- BY ADV. SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. SIVASANKARAN NAIR, S/O.LATE PARAMESWARAN PILLAI, ATIHRAKKADAVIL, CHEKKASSERY, MAYPRATHUVEETTIL, NJARALLOOR KARA, KIZHAKKAMBALAM VILLAGE. 2. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, S/O.LATE. PARAMESWARAN PILLA, -DO- -DO-~ 3. JANAKI AMMA, -DO- -DO- 4. THANKAMMA, -DO- -DO- 5. BHARGAVI AMMA, W/O.KUMARAN NAIR, MOSABTANK, HYDERBAD, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. K.NALINI, D/O. -DO- -DO- 7. K.BABU, S/O. -DO- -DO-. BY ADV.SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P.691/2008 & C.M.Appl.1243/2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 7th day of July, 2008. O R D E R These applications are filed on the premise that the order sought to be reviewed was not one passed on default. This is wrong. Though I had minuted what transpired in court on that day, the dismissal of the C.M.Appeal was only on default since steps were not taken. R.P. and C.M.Appl. are accordingly dismissed without prejudice. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/070708