:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2219 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 2219 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO. 2219 OF 2007 Mulchand K. Shah ..Petitioner versus Regional Provident Fund Commissioner for Maharashtra & Goa & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. H. D. Buch i/b. Mr. P. M. Patel for the Petitioner. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondent No.1. Mr. V. P. Vaidya for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and S. A. BOBDE, JJ. S. A. BOBDE, JJ. S. A. BOBDE, JJ. DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2008. DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . The dispute in this writ petition is with regard to payment of Provident Fund along with the interest. The petitioner maintains that he was paid the provident fund as contributed by him and as contributed by the employer but interest was not calculated, which is disputed by the respondents. Respondents claim that along with the interest provident fund was paid and on the basis of the earlier order of this court the matter was :2: reconsidered and it was communicated to the petitioner that he had been paid provident fund along with the interest. Counsel for the petitioner relies on certain documents to show that whatever has been paid to the petitioner was only provident fund and not the interest. Since there is a dispute between the parties whether interest is paid or not, we feel it will be difficult for this court to come to a conclusion as it may need determination of disputed questions of facts. Therefore, we dismiss this petition giving liberty to the petitioner to seek any other remedy that may be available to him in law. (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)