hQ/V Q , INTH'E HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT WRIT PETITION 1S) No. 2g g’6 OF 2009 :~ /Smt. -Priyawati Rai Wd/o Late Shri D.G. Rai aged about 64 years, R/o BILASPUR PETITIONER Bharapara, Pendra, Thana Pendra, Tahsil Pendra, District Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS ;— 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through — Secretary, Department of School an, Raipur ‘Ed‘uc‘atio‘n, D.K.S. Bhav (C.G.) The Commissioner; Tribal Welfare Department, Pendra, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. L Block Education Officer, Pendra, / District Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. The Joint Director, Funds, Account / /'arid Pension, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). «Qf 5. Accountant General Raipur Fund No. 5 Pandri, Pagariya Complex, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE N CONSTITUTION OF INDIA x @ g?) wa HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH : BILASPUR ’ \\\& Writ Pen'tionJS) No. 2870 of2009 Petitioner Smt. Priyawati Rai Versus , Respondents State of Chhattisgarh 8n othezs WRIT PETITON UNDER AR’I‘IC E 226 OF 'I‘HE CO ST ’I‘UTION OFI DIA. \J > . (SB: Hon’ble Shn' Satish K. Agnihoui .1.) Ms Reim Kocher, Advocate for the petitioners. ' Ms Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate Geneml with Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the mspondents No. 1 to 4. Ms Shanmla Singhai,‘Assistant Solicitor Geneml for the respondent No.5. o R n E Igman (Passed on this 10th day of September, 2009) Heaxd. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1 to 4/ State submits that the petitioner should approach the concerned authon'ty i.e. respondent No.3 Block Education Odicer, Pendra, District — Bilaspur to explain her case so that her retiral dues K like pension, gratuity and G.P.F. etc. may be considered and . decided, as early as possible. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the t‘ petitioner shall appear before the Block Education O$cer, Pendra, District Bilaspur on 5. 10.2009 to explain her case. 3. In View of the above this peu'tion stands disposed of with a direction to the Block Education O$cer, Pendra to pass a hesh order, in accordance with law, after considering the case of the petitioner. No order asto costs. .' M"/;n Sdk ;Satish K. Agn‘m ‘ tri i Judge