IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18187 of 2010 1. DINDAYAL RAI 2. SUBAIYA KUMAR 3. BHUDEO RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 15/06/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioners in a land dispute under Section- 307, 147, 149, 323, 324, 326, 448, 380, 342 and 504 of Indian Penal Code is that they are neither alleged to have assaulted the informant nor the other two inured i.e. Raju Rai or Mukesh. They are alleged to be only members of the mob with no overt act. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Danapur, Patna in connection with Akilpur P.S. Case No.49/2009 subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)