IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 8213 of 2009 Date of decision: March 24, 2009 Harbhajan Kaur ….. Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ….. Respondents Present: Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioner. **** S.S. SARON, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the complainant (respondent No.2) who is the daughter-in-law of the petitioner initially made a complaint dated 1.1.2007 (Annexure P2) to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Muktsar. In the said complaint, the petitioner was not named as an accused. Thereafter, the complainant/respondent No.2 filed a petition (Annexure P3) under Section 482 CrPC for issuance of direction to register FIR against respondents No.4 to 9 under the relevant Sections of IPC. In the said petition (Annexure P3), the petitioner was not named. Now, in the impugned complaint (Annexure P1) it has only been alleged that the petitioner had been wearing gold ear rings and gold bangles given to the complainant in dowry. It is submitted that there is no allegation of misappropriation. The petitioner, however, has not placed on record the summoning order without which it cannot be ascertained as to on what ground the petitioner has been summoned. In view thereof, there is no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. The petitioner may if so advised file a fresh petition after attaching the summoning order. (S.S. SARON) March 24, 2009 JUDGE amit