1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CAS No.99/2011 in Second Appeal No.276/2008 Kailash Vitthal Chavan and others Vs. Smt. Anjanabai wd/o Narayanrao Thorat and others. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Ms. R. Kalia, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. S. D. Chande, Adv. for respondent no.23. CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J. DATED : 17/2/2011. By the above civil application, the applicant, who is respondent no. 23 to the above Second Appeal seeks an injunction against the appellant above named. The Respondent no.23 is the brother of the appellant. The above Second Appeal has been admitted on 3/3/2010 and an interim relief to the effect that the possession of the appellant would not be disturbed during the pendency of the Second Appeal has been granted. The applicant thereafter had moved application bearing Civil Application No.722/2010 for review of the order dated 3/3/2010. The said civil application was withdrawn and liberty was granted to the applicant to file appropriate application. Thereafter another civil application 2 being CAS No.870/2010 came to be filed for review-recall of the order dated 3/3/2010 which came to be rejected on merits. Having failed to obtain any orders in the earlier two civil applications, the applicant has filed the instant civil application seeking injunction. It appears that this is another ruse adopted by the applicant to get the relief which he did not get in the earlier two civil applications. In the background of the aforesaid facts no relief can be granted to the applicant in the above Civil Application which is accordingly rejected. JUDGE Ambulkar