HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU W.P.No. 17005 of 2011 Date: 21-06-2011 Between: R. Sanyasi Naidu …………. Petitioner And The Board of Governors under the Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others …………. Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU W.P.No. 17005 of 2011 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed seeking to declare the inaction on the part of the first respondent in passing any orders in the appeal filed by the petitioner on 23-12-2010 against the orders of the second respondent in RC.No.Prl.Estt/Z-I/5664/02, dated 23-11-2010, in spite of the orders of this Court in W.P.No.4613 of 2011, dated 25-02-2011, as illegal and arbitrary and to set aside the further orders of the third respondent in the memo in Rc.No.Zone-I/Prls/5664/2002, dated 14-03- 2011. 2. The brief facts that are necessary for the disposal of the present writ petition are stated as follows: The petitioner was selected as a Post Graduate Teacher, Physical Science, by the District Selection Committee of A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society (for short ‘APSWREIS’) through the orders, dated 01-04-1985 and was posted at Badangi village, Vijayanagaram District. Subsequently, he was selected as a Principal on 18-05-1995 by the State Level Selection Committee of APSWREIS and was posted at Duppalavasala, Etcherla mandal, Srikakulam District. By the time of his joining as Principal, staff quarters of APSWREIS at Duppalavasala were under construction, and there were no electricity meters, compound wall, internal roads, street lights, water supply etc., and therefore, the staff members were not willing to occupy the said quarters. While so, an office memo dated 15-02-2002 was issued by the third respondent to the petitioner stating that the quarters were constructed spending huge amounts, but they were not occupied, and further directing the petitioner to explain the reasons for showing gross negligence and indirectly spoiling the staff quarters without proper watch and keeping vacant for more than four years. To the said memo, the petitioner submitted a detailed explanation on 05-03-2002 stating that the said works and amenities were not completed even by the date of issuance of the memo, dated 15-02- 2002. However, the second respondent issued the proceedings, dated 23-11-2010 inflicting the petitioner with a punishment of reduction in rank of PGT (Physical Science) under clause (vii) of rule-9 of Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1991 and to place him at the last point in the seniority list of PGTs in Zone-I, besides recovery of pecuniary loss of Rs.61.85 lakhs caused to the Government as well as to the society. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed an appeal before the first respondent-appellate authority along with a stay petition. As no orders have been passed, the petitioner filed W.P.No.4613 of 2011 before this Court and this Court disposed of the same by orders, dated 25-02-2011 with a direction to the Board of Governors to deal with the appeal as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate their decision to the petitioner. As the first respondent did not dispose of the appeal as per the direction of this Court, the present writ petition is filed by the petitioner. 3. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that inspite of giving direction by this Court, no orders have been passed by the Board of Governors and the impugned order is passed reverting the services of the petitioner and placing him at the last point in the seniority list of PGTs duly shocking to him, who had worked as a Principal for a considerable length of period. 4. The allegation is that the petitioner caused pecuniary loss to the society to a tune of Rs.61.85 lakhs. A departmental enquiry was conducted and the punishment of reversion has been awarded. Challenging the same, an appeal has been filed before the appellate authority. As the appeal has not been disposed of, the petitioner has filed W.P.No.4613 of 2011 before this court and this Court by order, dated 25-02-2011 disposed of the writ petition holding that “Let the Board of Governors deal with the appeal, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate their decision to the writ petitioner”. Seeking the same relief, which was sought in the said writ petition, the present writ petition has been filed. Therefore, the petitioner cannot be permitted to file the writ petitions one after the other for the same relief. There are no grounds to admit the writ petition. 5. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed at the stage of admission giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the appeal. No costs. ________________ K.C. BHANU, J Date: 21-06-2011 Note: Issue C.C. in three days. YCR