-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.7126 OF 2004 Dinesh Purshottam Lalji & ors. .. Petitioners Vs The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Bombay. .. Respondent Mr A.K.Abhyankar, for the petitioners. Mr D.M.Patil, for the respondent-Corporation. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 1st November, 2004. DATE : 1st November, 2004. DATE : 1st November, 2004. PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The notice of motion was filed by the petitioners for the following relief: "(a) that defendants be directed to give inspection of action papers and certified xerox copies of the same to the plaintiffs on payment of necessary charges," 3. The Court, while dealing with the motion, has rejected the prayer seeking directions to the respondent-Corporation to issue certified zerox copies -2- of action papers to the petitioners. The order does not state anything about the inspection of action papers. In view therefore, Mr Abhayankar, learned counsel for the pensioners, submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if they are given inspection to enable them to apply before the Court for production of action papers before the Court at an appropriate stage. Mr. Patil, learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation, did not seriously oppose the prayer for granting inspection. In view of this, the writ petition stands disposed of by following order. (i) The petitioners to apply for inspection of action papers to the respondent-Corporation within two weeks from today. If such application is made, the Corporation to grant inspection of the same to the petitioners within four weeks therefrom. . An authenticated copy of this order may be made available to the parties. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)