IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 10461 of 2009 Between: 1 Smt.Krishna Kumari W/o. Sri R.Raja Gopal Rao Garu H.No.8-3-224/9/3 Plot No.107 H-Block,Bhavanipuram Madhuranagar Colony,Yousufguda Hyderabad 2 A.Rajaiah S/o. Sri Rajamallu Garu H.No.8-3-224/9/3 Plot No.108 H-Block,Bhavanipuram Madhuranagar Colony,Yousufguda Hyderabad 3 S.Uttamkumar Chowdary S/o. Sri Bhura Ram Chowdary H.No.8-3-224/9/3 Plot No.109 H-Block,Bhavanipuram Madhuranagar Colony,Yousufguda Hyderabad 4 Kanyakumari Chowdary W/o.Sri Prakash Chowdary H.No.8-3-224/9/3 Plot No.110 H-Block,Bhavanipuram Madhuranagar Colony,Yousufguda Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Commissioner Greater Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad,Hyderabad(GHMC) 2 The City Planner Greater Municipal Corporation Hyderabad,Hyderabad(GHMC) .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to declare the action of the respondent No.2 from in any diging up trench contrary to the work order and estimate drawn up along with the plain way back in the year 2001 in W.O.No.EE/PD.M/MCH/2001-02 dt 26- 07-2001 as illegal,violative of various Court orders arbitrary against the principals of justice and contravening the provisions enshrined under Articles 14,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.JAGDISH Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms.JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.10461 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the alleged action of the second respondent in digging a trench contrary to the work order and estimate drawn up in work order bearing W.O.No. /EE/PD.M/MCH/2001-02, dated 26.7.2001 as arbitrary and illegal. 2. In response to the notice ordered by this Court, the Assistant City Planner, Circle No.X, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad, filed a counter affidavit on behalf of the respondents stating that a compound wall was already constructed by the respondent-Corporation earmarking the open space and that no trench was dug by the respondent-Corporation, nor there was any proposal for digging such a trench in the land in question. It is further stated that Madhura Nagar residents have only taken up the cleaning and levelling of the ground of the park and no other construction work is proposed. 3. In view of what has been stated in the counter affidavit, the allegations made by the petitioners are unfounded and appear to be mere apprehensions. Hence, no interference by this Court is warranted. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ JUSTICE G. ROHINI 05.06.2009. Msr/Ivd THE HON’BLE Ms.JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.10461 of 2009 05.06.2009 (Msr/Ivd)