IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-31021 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: November 16, 2011 Prem Kanta .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Vipin Ghai, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anju Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sidharath Sarup, AAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Main offence alleged in the FIR is under Sections 376/366 IPC. The petitioner is widow of Naresh Kumar and mother of the main accused, who allegedly have committed the offence under Sections 366/376 IPC. Obviously, allegation under Section 376 IPC cannot stand against the petitioner being a lady. As per the allegation, the petitioner is stated to have told her son to commit rape, which would not sound plausible. Mother cannot be expected to tell her son to do so. The petitioner is in custody since 13.7.2011. Without making any comment on merit, bail to the satisfaction of trial Court. The petition is, accordingly, allowed. November 16, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE