^^^c\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^^^ / 2010 PETITIONERS o/X^/" ^- .7 ^fr 5'€y1'/ ...^ s€"<y RESPONDENTS 1. Ku. Gowri, D/o. Shri Tularam, Aged about 30 years, R/o. M.B. Railway Station Colony, Janpad Panchayat Bastanar Jagdalpur (C.G.) 2;' Payako Ram Benjam, S/o. Shri Mura Ram, Aged about 33 years, R/o. Bagmundipaneda, Janpad Panchayat Bastanar District Bastar (C.G.) 3." Narendra Singh Thakur, S/o. Shri Kusho Ram Thakur, Aged about 26 years, R/o. Village Badekilepal, Janpad Panchayat Bastanar, District Bastar (C.G.) 4. Krishna Lal Gadharla, S/o. Shri Penta Ram, Aged about 28 years, R/o. PMT Boys Hostel, Dharampura, No.3, Bira Mudaward, Jagdalpur (C.G.) 5. Smt. Dhaneshwari Sinha, W/o. Narendra Kumar Sinha, Aged about 32 years, R/o. Purana Gidamnaka, Bahadurguda, Jagdalpur (C.G.). 6. • Smt. Anita Markam, W/o. Shri A. Markam, Aged about 41 years, R/o. VSP Badekilepal, District Bastar (C.G.). VERSUS 1.' State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Secretary, School Education Department, D.KS. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Collector Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) 4. T Jila Panchayat, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). Through the Chief Executive Officer. 5. Janpad Panchayat, Bastanar, District Bastar (C.G.) Through the Chief Executive Officer. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA l-HC—78 WR^TT %t*18<^ '3'oEf ^i^Kri^, ^Til^^^ f@s<ni^^< ^...iLA/,£,.^2.^.0:..^.^..^200 ^?T 'q^T (^3^t?) W^I^Tl^??^ ^T^T W^T^^tW ^<nw ^fi^ 3?i^i SB: Hon^ble Shri Maniadra Mojhasi Shrivasta^-a, J. wailjmg 6,8.2010 Shri Ashok Kuniar ShuklA Shri Viuod Tekani, Paiielj No. 1 to 3, on advaace copy. Heard on adiiiission. Subinission of learaed c< vide order dated 30.5.2009 (Ami^ extended tlie vaHdity ofthe waitis^g tlie said order was witlidrawn by | P-4) and the vaUdity of fhe 2009. Learaed counsel for tliel coinniunication of fhis inemLO d counseUng had already taken pla|?/ petitioners aiid ofher candidate| nienxo was written on 7.7.; Executive Ofiicer, Jaapad Panj Executive Officer, JUa Panchaya^ as to what steps should be takenj subjected to coiuiselin.g on 5th date, fhe Chief Executive Officer, taken aay decision, aad ia fhe ^T^feNt^T 'R'i^ff "^* "fe^ Tf^f^R ^3tfm 371^1 i, counsel for the petitioners. Law}rer for fhe State/respondents punsel for fhe petitioners is that ^xure P-3), the State Goverameut Ustup to 31stAiigust, 2009. But |inenio dated 27.6.2009 (Annexure select Ust was tiU 30th June, petitioners submits fh.at before ^ated 27.6.2009 (Annexurc P-4), lajpe on 5th Jiily, 2009, in which the ^ were allowed to participate, A )0p (Annexurc P-5) by the Chief Aayat, Bastaiiar to fhe Chief Jagdalpur, to provide guideUiies IHI respect of caiididates who have Jitily, 2009. It is siibmitted that till jJUa Paiichyat, Jagdalpur has not m^antiine, an. order of appOHitoient J+ly, ^ ^— ~T "^,. 'i ^ ^.:^^-r ^ ^: '^^'y •^jy' 'Trof'^TRT^PT,'^^FT?, [sSolH^ ^iH^fiwn^ •-^200 /^ ^n^T I(WF (^si^^) 3?T^?T ^T ^Jcb WT 3TT^T «i*li<ft Praveeii ll*^ ^RTTW ^cT 3TT^r -z ^RfeNh TTR^?f ^f f^A <F3l-^K iF? ^?RTH ^i^T of one Radha Vatti, who appeare(|[ in tlie coiinseliug dated 5th Jiily, 2009 was issued. The Chief Executive Offic^ consider aad decide the miatter 1 (Annexure P-5) aad fhe decision ^ of 2 raonth.s with regard to peti^ fhe ground ofparity. }r, Jila Paachayat, Jagdalpur shall lin view of letter dated 7.7.2009 s|haU be taken withia aa outer timit Itoners' claun for appoiataient, on If fhe petitioners' grievao.^ would be at Uberty to take available to ttiem under tlie law. recaurse e is not redressed, the petitioners to such reniedy as laay be With fhe aforesaid obser^ations, tlie petition staads finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^mr^W ^N ^?T^?:, ?^^riq- "—FS/H7~2/2(HO— l ,00,000.