IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7868 of 2011 MALTI DEVI Versus KAMESHWAR SINGH & ORS ----------- 2 10.5.2011 This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 2.5.2010 by which the application of the petitioner has been rejected, by which the petitioner has sought revision of the order of the Lok Adalat. At the very first stage it is stated that Lok Adalat does not decide any list. Therefore, Lok Adalat cannot be held to be tribunal or the court. The Lok Adalat Adhiniyam cannot confer any power under the Lok Adalat Act and that has rightly not been conferred as the Lok Adalat does not decide any list on its own rather it confers the compromise duly verified by the counsel between the parties. However, if any party later on comes and says that the compromise has been obtained by playing fraud, in that case he has remedy under the civil law to get that decree null and void. In such a proceeding writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked as the question of fraud a list cannot be decided without taking evidence of the parties. Thus, petition lacks merits . The writ petition is dismissed, accordingly. AnilKrSinha ( Prakash Chandra Verma, J.)