IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. R. No.88 of 2010 (O & M) Date of decision: 13.09.2010 Sitender .. Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others. .. Respondents Present:- Mr.Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Vikram Jain, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent-State. * * * * 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) It is not disputed that out of total six accused only one i.e. Pardeep, son of Rajbir, was convicted by the learned trial Court and the other accused including present respondents were acquitted by the same order and judgment dated 09.07.2009 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Rohtak. Pardeep, son of Rajbir, who was convicted by this judgment filed a Criminal Appeal No.S-1739-SB of 2009 before this Court against the order of his conviction. The said appeal was decided on 18.05.2010 vide which Pardeep, s/o Rajbir was acquitted of the charge framed against him. Accordingly, present revision petition is also dismissed being devoid of merits. September 13, 2010 (NIRMALJIT KAUR) sukhpreet JUDGE