1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. Contempt Petition No.98 of 2007 In APP/291/2005 In N/1007/2004 In S/3432 /1987 Moolchand Kaluchand Ranka & 5 ors. .. Petitioners v/s. Manohar Vithal Telang & 2 ors. .. Respondents Mr.Vaibhav Sugdare i/by Y. Bhansali & Co. for Petitioners. Mr.J.S.Chandnani for Res.No.1 . Respondent No.1 is present in person. ----- CORAM : SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. Dated : 17 th October, 2008 P.C. : 1. Notice has been issued upon Respondent Nos.1 and 3. Possession has been taken by the Court Receiver from Respondent Nos.1 and 3. Temporary alternate accommodation has been given to Respondent Nos.1 and 3. Respondent Nos.1 and 3 have not accepted the payment of Rs.24 Lakhs required to be paid to them. 2. Advocate on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 and 3, though having been discharged, has assisted the Court on behalf of 2 Respondent No.1. He states that the basic amenities have not been given to Respondent Nos.1 and 3. The Petitioners deny this fact. Respondent Nos.1 and 3 shall be entitled to take out whatever application they deem fit upon proving lack of basic amenities. However, it is seen that the contempt now does not remain. 3. Hence the Contempt Notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition stands rejected. The Petitioners shall deposit Rs.24 Lacs in Court within 1 week. Respondents 1 and 3 shall be entitled to apply for withdrawal of that amount as and when they desire. [SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.]