IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2011 / 28TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1635 of 2011(D) ------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. JISHNU.T.K., S/O.KAILASANATHAN, AGED 23 YEARS, THODIYAKKAAVU HOUSE, THACHANGAD, POST MATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. ARUNDAS.K.V., SREESAILAM, KERALASSERY P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISSTRICT, PIN – 673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN – 673 635. R1 & R2 BY SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 1635 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 18th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 5th Semester examination was declared, 1st petitioner failed in EIT 502 (Digital Data Communication) and the 2nd petitioner failed in EIT 501 (Software Engineering) and EIT 502 (Digital Data Communication). They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE vi