IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 23024 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 02.09.2011 Neeraj Jain ...Petitioner Versus M/s GVS Enterprises and another ..Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Ms. Poonam Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. As per office report, service of respondent No.1-complainant is not complete. It is a case, in which non-bailable warrants were issued for ar- rest of the petitioner on account of his non-appearance in the court in a complaint filed by respondent No.1 under Section 138 of the Negotiable In- struments Act, 1881. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in terms of the order passed on 01.08.2011, the petitioner has already appeared before the court below and furnished his bail bonds. Considering the aforesaid facts, interim bail granted to the peti- tioner on 01.08.2011, is made absolute, however, with liberty to the com- plainant to move application in case, he has any objection to the order passed. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 02.09.2011 sharmila