Lsp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 558 of 2009 Late Ramesh Prabhakar Arte Through legal heirs Vijay Ramesh Arte & ors. ...Petitioners V/s. Madhav Nathuram Wadke ...Respondents Mr. Kishor V. Tembe for the petitioners. Mr. N.V.Gangal for the respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. DATED DATED DATED : MARCH 05, 2009 : MARCH 05, 2009 : MARCH 05, 2009 P.C. . Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. During the course of arguments, Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the limited relief that is claimed by the Petitioner against the Respondent is that the Respondent should not indulge in putting up any further construction on the said property. 3. Counsel for the Respondent on instructions of the Respondent who is present in Court states that the Respondent has no intention to put up any further construction on the suit property. That statement is accepted. The Respondent further assures that in case in future the Respondent intends to carry on any further construction of additional premises or structure on the 2 suit land, he would do so only after taking prior permission of the Municipal Authorities and Revenue Authority including giving prior intimation to the Petitioner herein in that behalf well in advance atleast two weeks before the further construction activity is commenced after receipt of permission from the Municipal Authority and Revenue Authority. Respondent assures to abide by that arrangement. 4. In the circumstances, nothing survives for consideration in the present Petition. The above arrangement shall continue till the disposal of the suit or till such other order is passed by the Trial Court, if the situation so warrants. 5. Petition disposed of on the above terms. [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.]