IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13775 of 2011 SHAILENDRA KUMAR S/O RAJ KISHORE SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CBI ----------- 02 03.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner being one of the loanees is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 120b, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13 (2) r/w 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The broad accusation is that 32 borrowers were granted loan on the basis of fake possession certificate, land receipt and title, hence the higher officials of the bank directed for lodging the case. It is submitted by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that Rs. 14,21,095/- were taken as loan in February 2009, but on 12th January, 2010, Rs. 14,57,000/- have been deposited in the bank and the compromise with the bank has been arrived at. Learned counsel for the C.B.I. submits that the document of deposit being 2 made by petitioner as contained in Annexure-2 does not reflect that this document was ever supplied to the C.B.I., moreover the act of committing forgery is there in spite of the return of the money. It is further submitted that other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in the matter. Considering the fact that the money has been returned and the matter has been settled between the petitioner and the bank, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IXth Patna (Special Judge, C.B.I. South Bihar, Patna) in connection with R.C. 7(A)/2008, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Indian Penal Code. One of the bailors will be the relation of the petitioner. 3 The C.B.I. will be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner, if the certificate of return of amount as contained in Annexure-2 will be found to be forged. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)