Criminal Misc. No. 21027-M of 2011 Subhash vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate with the petitioner. *** The petitioner along with four other persons was arrested on 22.03.2011 on the basis of the secret information that the petitioner and others were planning to rob the vehicles. The petitioner was apprehended while making preparation for dacoity. The secret information was allegedly received on 21.03.2011 by the police. The petitioner has been in custody w.e.f. 22.03.2011. Learned State counsel has opposed the application for bail on the ground that the petitioner is involved in another case and he remained absent in that case. Learned counsel for the petitioner explained that the petitioner in that case is involved in petty theft. On account of having been involved in this case the petitioner could not appear in that case. As a result, of which warrants were issued against him. Without expression of any opinion on merits of the case, it is sufficient to observe that the recovery has already been effected in this case; the challan has already been presented; and the trial is likely to take a long time, the petitioner can be granted the concession of bail. Petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court. [M.M.S.BEDI] JUDGE 24th August, 2011 Shivani Kaushik