1 CA-10441.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10441 OF 2011 IN W. P. NO. 404 OF 2004 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. S.M. Vibhute, Advocate for the Applicant/Petitioner Mr. K.S. Patil, A.G.P. for the respondent-State Mr. P.S. Patil, Advocate for the respondent no.2 Mr. K.D. Bade Patil, Advocate for the respondent no.5 ... CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 13.10.2011 P.C.:- 1. The learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner has fairly moved this Court for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 29.09.2011. 2. The learned counsel submits that though this Court while dictating the order, has allowed the amendment application, it has specifically rejected the prayer made by the petitioner for interim relief. It is therefore submitted that the same is not reflected in the order dated 29.09.2011 passed in Civil Application no. 10441 of 2011. 2 CA-10441.2011 3. In that view of the matter, the motion is allowed. Following sentence be inserted in the order: "The application is rejected insofar as prayer clause (C) and (D) is concerned." 4. The period to carry out the amendment is extended by two weeks from today. The appearance is also incorrectly shown in the said order. Appearance of Shri P.S. Patil be shown for respondent no.2 in place of Shri M.S. Deshmukh. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]