IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1276 of 2010 1. BALKESHWAR RAI S/O LATE SITARAM RAI R/O NEW DAMARIYA, ROAD NO. 21, GARDNIBAGH, P.S. GARDNIBAGH, DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1.THE PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH IT'S MAYOR, BUDH MARG PATNA 2.MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER CUM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDH MARG, PATNA 3.CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDH MARG, PATNA 4.EXECUTIVE OFFICER NUTAN RAJDHANI ANCHAL, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 10 HARDING ROAD PATNA ----------- 2. 29.1.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna Municipal Corporation. The petitioner who retired from the services of the respondent Corporation from the post of Tax Collector with effect from 31.1.1999 is claiming payment of his post retiral dues, the details of which have been set out in para-1 of the writ petition and relates to provident fund, leave encashment, gratuity, group insurance, difference of salary in revised scale from 1.1.1996 to 31.10.2004 by reason of the implementation of the VIth Pay Revision in the Corporation and dearness allowance. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite a period of more than 11 years having 2 passed, the retiral benefits of the petitioner have not been paid. It is submitted that the respondent no.2 the Municipal Commissioner-cum- Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation may be appropriately directed to consider the claims of the petitioner and make payment of the same. Having regard to the circumstances set forth, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before respondent no.2 the Municipal Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive officer setting out his claims and which shall be considered by him and the entire admissible amount of the post retiral benefits and arrears of salary together with the admissible interest be paid to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date on which the representation is filed. Needless to add that if any of the claims of the petitioner is not found to be admissible, the same should be rejected by a reasoned order. The writ petition is disposed of. ahk (Jyoti Saran,J.) 3