IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17165 of 2011 1. Sunita Devi. 2. Vivek Kumar @ Vivek Sah. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 24.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 363, 365, 366-A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the informant’s minor daughter was abducted by one Sachin, who is the maternal brother of the petitioner Vivek Kumar and from the house of the Vivek Kumar the victim went in the company of Sachin. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that though in 164 Cr.P.C. statement the victim named this petitioner but it appears that subsequently the informant retracted from his initial version and filed a compromise. The medical report suggest the age of victim as 16 to 17 years. 2 Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 149 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)