1 wp3354.10 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3354 OF 2010 Shri Balu Sakharam Landbale. ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ....Respondent. Mr.Rameshwar N. Gite, advocate for petitioner. Ms. M.H.Mhatre, APP for State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED:- DECEMBER 22, 2010. P.C. 1. The grievance of the Petitioner is primarily that the investigation undertaken in the present case is not proper. Besides, there are some deficiencies in the investigation, which has culminated in filing of A-Summary report before the concerned court. This and other incidental grievances can be considered by the concerned court, if the Petitioner were to make application before that court and ask for appropriate relief including of issuance of direction to the Investigating Officer to resort to further investigation under section 173(8) of the Code. All questions raised in this Petition are left open. The Petitioner is free to take recourse to alternative remedy, as aforesaid. We have no manner of 2 wp3354.10 doubt that the concerned court will decide the matter on its own merit in accordance with law expeditiously. 2. Petition disposed of on the above terms. (A.P.BHANGALE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)