IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4314 of 2009 UMESH CHANDRA SINGH Versus RADHA KRISHNA YADAV ----------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Anil Pd. Singh, Advocate 6 30.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears on behalf of opposite party despite service of notice. I.A. No. 5463 of 2010 has been filed for condoning the delay of about eight months and twenty nine days in preferring this application. From the averments made in paragraph Nos. 2 and 3 of this application, it appears that the petitioner was prevented by sufficient cause from filing this application within time. On being satisfied with the reasons mentioned in this application, the delay of about eight months and twenty nine days in filing this application is hereby condoned and the aforesaid interlocutory application is allowed. Now, I proceed to consider this application on its own merit. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This application has been filed for restoration of Civil 2 Revision No.1643 of 2006 which stood dismissed for want of prosecution on 24.2.2009. On being satisfied with the reasons furnished in this application for omission on part of the petitioner, the same is allowed and the Civil Revision No.1643 of 2006 is restored to its original file and number. Sanjay-II ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)