Crl. Revision No. 1752 of 2007 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Revision No. 1752 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision : November 08, 2011 Mrs. Sonie Partner Kumar Agencies .... PETITIONER Vs. State of Punjab and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH * * * Present : Mr. R.S.Ghuman, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vishal Munjal, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Mr. R.M.Suri, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. * * * AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL) This revision petition was preferred by the petitioner challenging order dated 14.08.2007 (Annexure P-1), vide which the application moved by the petitioner under Section 245 Cr.P.C. for discharge stands dismissed. During the course of hearing of the case, a compromise was entered into between the petitioner and respondent No. 2-Kotak Mahindra Crl. Revision No. 1752 of 2007 (O&M) 2 Primus Ltd. now Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd., agreed to compound the offences. As per the agreement, an amount of ` 2,36,000/- was to be paid by the petitioner to respondent No. 2. In compliance with the agreement, a bank draft bearing No. 406941 dated 31.10.2011 in the name of Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. for an amount of ` 2,36,000/- payable at State Bank of Patiala, Urban Estate Phase-II, Jalandhar, has been handed over to the counsel for respondent No. 2, who has accepted the same and on receipt of the same, he submits that the offence qua the petitioner having been compounded, the present petition be allowed. In view of the statement made by the counsel for respondent No. 2 and the compromise, which has been entered into between the parties, which has resulted in the compounding of the offence, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner stands discharged. (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) November 08, 2011 JUDGE pj