IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH JANUARY 2008 / 10TH MAGHA 1929 ST.Rev..No. 246 of 2003 --------------------------------- ORDER DATED 8.5.2003 IN TA.822/2002 OF THE KERALA SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ADDITIONAL BENCH-I, ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER/APPELLANT IN T.A./ASSESSEE: --------------------------------------------------------------- M/S.INDIA PAGING SERVICES LTD., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR SRI.ANIL D. NAIR SMT.PRIYA MAHESH SMT.PRIYA MANJOORAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN T.A/REVENUE: -------------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.MOHAMMED RAFIQ THIS SALES TAX REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.M.JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------ S.T.Rev.No.246 of 2003 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 30th day of January, 2008 ORDER H.L.Dattu, C.J. Sri.Anil D.Nair, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner, would submit that in view of the orders passed by the Court in a Company Petition, an Official Liquidator has been appointed to manage the affairs of the petitioner company. It is further stated that he has no instruction from the Official Liquidator to prosecute this revision petition. 2. This petition is of the year 2003. We cannot keep this revision petition pending on the board even after four years. In such circumstances, we dismiss this petition for non-prosecution. However, liberty is reserved to the Official Liquidator of the petitioner company, if he so desires, to make an appropriate application for recalling the orders passed by us rejecting the revision petition for non-prosecution. 3. Consequently, I.A.No.1762 of 2003 is also dismissed. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE vns