IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2009 / 8TH SRAVANA 1931 RP.No. 457 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.11753/2009 Dated 21/04/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. VASUDEVAN,AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.LATE GOPALAN, NAARAKAMPOIKAYIL HOUSE,SOOLAPARA KARA, VANDANMEDU VILLAGE,UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. SASIMON.K.T.,AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.THANKAPPAN,KOLLAKUZHIYIL HOUSE, SOOLAPPARA KARA,VANDANMEDU VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK,IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SREELAL N.WARRIER RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. RAVIPRASAD,AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR,"PRANAVAM HOUSE", "SOOLAPARA KARA",VANDANMEDU VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK,IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. SHEELA,W/O.RAVIPRASAD,AGED 48 YEARS, "PRANAVAM HOUSE","SOOLAPARA KARA", VANDANMEDU TALUK,IDUKKI DISTRICT. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VANDANMEDU POLISE STATION, VANDANMEDU VILLAGE,UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, COLLECTORATE BUILDING, KUYILUMALA,PYNAVU,IDUKKI. G.P. SHRI.DILIP MOHAN ADV. SRI.A.C.DEVASIA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ. ================== R.P.No.457/2009 in W.P.(C).No. 11753/2009 ================== Dated this the 30th day of July, 2009 O R D E R Antony Dominic, J.: By judgment dated 21.4.2009, the writ petition filed by respondents 1 and 2 herein was disposed of recording the undertaking of the review petitioners that they will abide by Ext.P11, an exparte interim order passed by the Munsiff's Court, Kattappana, in I.A.No.156/2009 in O.S.No.57/2009. It was also directed that if there is any attempt to violate the undertaking, it would be open to respondents 1 and 2 to approach respondents 3 and 4 for obtaining necessary assistance. 2. In this review petition, the review petitioners complain that in view of the direction in the judgment referred to above, the Munisiff's Court is declining to consider their objection in I.A.No.156/2009 and pass orders. Taking into account the complaint of the review petitioners, we clarify that the question of obedience to Ext.P11 order arises only so long as the order remains in force and this Court has not attached any finality to the said order. R.P.457/09 2 Irrespective of judgment rendered by this Court, it would be open to the Munsiff's Court consider the objection filed by the review petitioners and pass orders thereon taking into account the same with notice to the parties concerned. It is clarified accordingly. The review petition is disposed of with the above observation. Sd/- S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Sd/- sdk+ ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge