1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 8. CA/4834/2010 (PRABHAKAR RAMCHANDRA SURYAWANSHI AND ANR V/S THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS) In WP/8797/2009 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.S.S.Deshmukh, Adv., for the applicant. Mr.V.G.Shelke, AGP for respondent State. Ms.Netrali Jain, Adv., for R.5 & 6. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:8/10/2010 1. Heard. The grievance of Mr.Deshmukh, learned Counsel for original respondent no.5 and 6 is, by operation of the orders of status quo, the respondent/applicant is facing financial losses. He has urged for keeping the writ petition for hearing. Considering the grounds referred, the hearing of the writ petition can be expedited and, consequently, the application seeking vacating the orders dt. 1.2.2010 need not be entertained 2 today. Application disposed of. However, the writ petition shall be finally heard on 18th Nov.,2010. Pleadings left over, if any, to be complied with upto 18th Nov.,2010. If the petitioner seeks accommodation, the result would be automatic vacation of the order dt.1st Feb.,2010. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/4834-10ca