TN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRrrPETrrION(S)No. ’57 0' 29% PEFITIONERS Ramdas Gunendra S/o Premlal Gunendra, aged about 42 years, Govt. Adim Jati Kalyan Primary School, Dhotimtola, Block—I Dondi, Durg, (C.G.) Mulchand Sahu S/o Neelkanth Sahu aged about 44 years, Govt. Primary School, Latabod, Block— Batod, Durg, Chagan Lal Patel S/o Shobharam Patel aged about 49 years, Govt‘ Primary School, Latabod, Block- Balod, Durg, Vijay Kumar Thakur S/o Bisauharam aged about 42 years, Govt. Primary School, Jugera, Block— Balod, Durg, Versus RESPONDENTS 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary Department of Higher Education, D.K.S Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner Publication and instruction Department, Raipur (CG) The District Education Ofncer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/% OF THE CONS'lTl'UTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT IN THE LIGHT NATURE L / 4. v52 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(5) No. 1151 of 2007 Pe‘fi‘l'ioners : Ramdas Gunendm and O‘rhers Versus Responden‘l‘s : S‘ra‘re of Chha‘rtisgarh and o‘l'hers SB: Hon’ble Mr. Jusfice Sa'l'ish K. Agnihofri, J Presen'l': Mr. 5.C. Verma, Advoca'l'e for ‘rhe pe‘ri‘rioners. Mr. Vinny Pandey, Panel Lawyer for The Sfn‘re/respondenfs. O R D E R (Passed on this 23’“ Day of February, 2007) 1. The pefi‘l'ioner No. 1 was appoin‘red on 19.12.88, The pefi‘rioner No. 2 was eppoin‘i’ed on 1.11.89, "rhe pe‘l'i‘i'ioner No. 3 was appoinfed on 28.6.86 and fhe pe+i+ioner No. 4 was appoin‘red on 19.12.88 as Assisfan’r Teachers on fixed pay scale of Rs. 300/-. Affer comple‘l‘ion of one year probation, 1'hey were gran-red regular pay sec-x1e of Rs. 545-925/—. . Learned counsel appearing for fhe pe‘ti‘rioners submi'l's 1'ha1' 1'he issue involved in The case is asfo whe-rher fhe pe‘rifioners are en‘l‘i'l'led To regular pay scale w.e.f. 1'he da'ie of initial appoin‘l'men'l' or' from fhe dale of complel'ion of proba‘rion period. . The issue involved, herein was considered by 1'he Madhya Pradesh 51'a‘re Adminis‘rra‘live Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Modhukanf Yadu and 56 ofhers Vs. Sfa‘l’e of M.P. & ofhers), wherein if was held fha‘r fhe similarly si‘ruafed feachers are sagas”;- m @ en‘ri‘Hed +0 regular pay scale w.e.f. fhe da‘l’e of inifial appointment The mafwr- was faken up To fhe Hon‘ble Supreme Courf in Special Leave Peii‘l'ion (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said pe‘i'i'rion was dismissed by the Hon‘ble Supreme Cour‘l' upholding The decision of 1’he Tribunal fo The effec'l' Tha‘r fhe Teachers/Assisfanf Teachers are en'ri'rled To regular pay scale from da'ie of ini‘l'ial appoim'men‘r. Learned counsel appearing for fhe par‘ries jointly submif ‘l'haf fhis case is squarely covered by 'rhe decision of This Cour? in W. P. (s) No. 6102 of 2006 (Dehman Nayak S/o Harishankar and oil'hers vs. Sfafe of Chhaffisgarh and others), which was allowed vide orders dated 8.11.2006. They further submit that the question of law involved is also the same. l l i l Satish K. Agnihotri Judge In view of that, this petition is allowed in the same terms. No order l l r i as to costs. l Sd/— .