1 16 caf.3520.09 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATIN NO. 3520 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (stamp) NO. 20518 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Atul Singh for the Applicant. Mr. Chandrakant Chavan for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 19 th January, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant and the learned counsel appearing for the 1 st respondent. The application is opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the 1 st respondent by pointing out that there is no sufficient cause for condonation of delay. Delay is of 122 days, which has been adequately explained in the application. 2 Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to condition of the Applicant paying costs of Rs.5,000/- to the 1 st respondent within a period of four weeks from today. Payment of costs shall be condition precedent. [ A.S.OKA, J ]