{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 986 OF 2010 Santosh Arun Gaikwad and Another APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT ....... Mr. E.G.Irale, Advocate for the applicants Mr. K.S.Patil, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 12th July 2010 PER COURT: 1. By this application, the applicants have prayed to release them on bail in connection with CR No.169/2008 registered with Peth Beed Police Station. 2. Heard. 3. At the outset, learned APP has shown a communication addressed to 3rd Judicial Magistrate, First Class, {2} Beed by the office of the Ad Hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Beed in respect of judgment of conviction in Sessions Case No.22/2009, as the trial was committed to the Court of Sessions by the 3rd JMFC, Beed. It appears that the judgment is delivered on 21st April 2010 and the applicants, who are accused No.3 and 4, in the said Sessions Case, are convicted for different offences by the learned Sessions Court. In the premise, the present application does not survive, as become infructuous, and hence stands dismissed accordingly. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/criapln986-10