IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.15499 of 2008 Date of Decision : 02.09.2008 IMT Auto Components (P) Ltd. .....Petitioner versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH. HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY. Present : Mr.Puneet Bali, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- UMA NATH SINGH, J. Since this matter was also considered by this Court earlier in two writ petitions and necessary directions were also given for deciding the legal notices of petitioner, it would be appropriate to file a contempt petition to secure the compliance of earlier directions. As learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would advise the petitioner to file a contempt petition for compliance of earlier orders, this writ petition would not survive. Hence, disposed of as such. (UMA NATH SINGH) JUDGE 02-09-2008 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) *mohinder JUDGE