IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.33422 -M of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 11, 2010 KULDIP KAUR & ORS. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Sachin Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate, for respondents 2 to 7. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of two petitions viz. Criminal Miscellaneous No.33422-M of 2009 (Kuldip Kaur and others v. State of Punjab and others) and Criminal Miscellaneous No.31962-M of 2008 (Gurdev Lal and others v. State of Punjab and others). The prayer made in these petitions under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, is for quashing FIR No.127 dated 24.4.2001 under Sections 323, 427, 447, 506, 148, 149, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Nakodar, District Jalandhar (Annexure P-1), cross-version therein and subsequent proceedings, on the basis of compromise. Both the cases arise out of the same incident. Compromise deed has been placed on record as Criminal Misc. No.33422 -M of 2009 2 Annexure P-2 in both the petitions. Criminal Miscellaneous No.33422-M of 2009 was referred to the Daily Lok Adalat. Order dated 3.12.2009 passed by the Lok Adalat mentions the compromise and Compromise Deed (Mark 'A'). Considering the common stand of both the sides and the fact that the Lok Adalat has also taken into account the factum of compromise, both the petitions are allowed. FIR No.127 dated 24.4.2001 under Sections 323, 427, 447, 506, 148, 149, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Nakodar, District Jalandhar (Annexure P-1), cross-version therein and subsequent proceedings are quashed. February 11, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?