IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 656 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 345 OF 2008 MRS. NANDITA SOHONI AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND 4 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Nitin Sardessai, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. R. Chodankar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & R. C. CHAVAN, JJ. Date:- 27th August, 2008 P.C. 1. The petitioners by this Misc. Civil Application seek to incorporate certain subsequent developments. 2. We have perused the amendment application which is filed by the petitioners. There is no affidavit in reply. There is, thus, no dispute that the events as sought to be incorporated, are subsequent. Further, we are satisfied that for effective and complete adjudication of the controversy, grant of amendment would be fair and proper. Further, that would obviate multiplicity of proceedings. 3. Misc. Civil Application is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). The petition allowed to be amended as per Schedule. Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today. After the amended copy is served on the respondents, liberty is granted to the respondents to file an additional affidavit. Application disposed off. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. R. C. CHAVAN, J. ssm.