•ffl1 '»;.-' INTHE H@N'Bl.E.HIieM£WJRT;01=CHHAT~TiSGftftH ,:." ATBILASPUR .. . .' :,:.: '-:i M.A.TClNO.^^/2009i APPELLANT/ NONAPPLICANT N0.1 l^" A3^&^ ^r£w:iSSr> ,w-^-^ »^ 'v^ RESPONDENTS Deepak Agrawal S/o. Kishan 1-a'l Agrgvval,'ag;eysab®yfcli35 years, R/6. Natla, Station Road, Tahsil Janjgjr, Distrjct (C.G.) aanjgir-ChaFnpa A^, <• VERSUS l.' Srtit. Milaytin Bai Wd/o. Late Ramlal,f@gsfie^: Sul'yawa.nshi, aged abolut : 40 years, R/o. Najla Bhatapara, Police SCation Naila, Tahsil : j,gir, Oistrict : 3anjg'i,r- Cliampa (C.G.) Gt.ABMANT 2, Sh jv \ Narayan Su rava hshi S/6. Sukhau Ram Syryavanghi, aged aboui: 40 years, R/Q. ShivnBGreoyvfc 1 Naila, Tahsil Janjgir, DistriGt (C.G.). Janjgir-Champa !^'?:-r' NONAPPI.IGANTN6.2 3. Branch Manager, Tt|ie Oriental Insurance Gornpany Ltd., Near TFimurti Talkies, Stati&n Road Ehampa, Tahsil : Champa^ District : Janjgir- Champa (C.G.), NON«l*l*t.It:AN-rN0.3 M'EMO.OI='ARPEAL;;UN®EI^SEES1'II@(N^?^©IIiM^^ •.•VE:HffiElE^^'al!f88c "K':/''1'^ f-t. XI-HC—78 sn^rwft-ii* ^i'nsi'^i'anN; \s' <fc ^5E[ "tll-'iHA), ®Ti1-M<l<o, fa(1l-M'j,< /)-€ ^o.^' widi «>*iian -^200 aii^T •q'ra' (•^3«i<^l) yBKW^toTs^ SB: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTIdB N.K. AGARWAL 1-7-2009 Shri Pushpendra Patell Heard on adxuissioii. The iastaat appeal is 12-2008 passed ia Claim Accident Clainis Tribunal, awarded a suin of Rs. 2,74, aiuiiun fi-oia the date ofappl against the appeUaut and InsuTaace Coiupaiiy i.e. resp) coinpeusation, on the grou^id labourer, was not covered us^.e Brieffacts offhe case 2008, Ramlal who was work^a; aad also worldng as Labou^e truck Swaraj Mazda Metado: 2338 aloug with other persc beiag driven by respondent N near viUage Kannaadi, it tar- accident Ramlal died. The c] deceased Ramlal, preferred the Motor Vehicles Act claimfln! '*i<<i<'i<fl'f iWffT ^f 'fe'zt <r°i«i< ^sifmsn^i Advocate for fhe appeUaat. directed against the award dated 3- ^se No. 39/2008 by Chief Motor Janjgir whereby leamed Tribiiaal 300/- along with iaterest @ 9% per ;ation ia favour of fhe claiinaat aad ;spondent No. 2, exonerating fhe )ndent No. 3 from. fhe liabiUty to pay that deceased Ramlal who was |ler the policy. ^s per the claunaats are ftiat on 5-4- ^ag ia Kirana Shop ofthe appeUaut :r ia the truck, was sittiag in fhe bearing registration No. CG 10-C- |us for the work of owner/appeUaiit b. 2. Wlien the said vehicle icached led turtle and pursuant to the said jiimaat, who is unfortuiiate widow of [claun petitioa under Section 166 of ^ng compensation to fhe tane ofRs. /c^\ %'»»%«>. 8 ' 'tfsSSaSSi E XI-HC—78 311^1 ?RI fe-ljdl ^9V ^ft^T st>*lieh *ii*iCTi ai*n<h 3^ "41'>ild-tl, ®lll-M''l<a,fa^l'M'j.i (wOL^Nlto, ^S/^, ^...^......:;....^...^.........................^2QQ a.n^T'iR^ ('^3s(^ti) •renwaftwaffl^i app^Baat tbe trifal 10,18,500/-. Leaued Tribun^l fhe pardes, evidence led ora^ aad awarded a sum. of Rs. E, per aanuin agauist the exonerated the iasuraace deceased was not covered b^ Learaed couiisel for findiag recorded by the based on evidence 011 reconl. policy Ex. A-3-1 only the fherefore, ofher persons iacl|Li< sitting ia fhe said vehicle therefore, fhe award passed] proper. No other grouiid has appeal. The appeal is theref4 hereby dismissed sunimarilyj *iifci<fl-i M^<S ^ fscS <Fflt$i< ^T affira aii^ii after appreciating fhe pleadings of and documeiitary, passed aa award !,74,500/- along with interest @ 9% aad respondent No. 2 only and c|3nipaay on the ground that risk of fhe iasuraace policy. appeUaat failed to assail the said Court which. is a fiiidiag of fact t. It is also not disputed fhat as per |risk of one driver is covered aud, ;lJLidiag the deceased Ramlal who were ^re not covered by the poUcy aad by ffae leamed Tribunal is just aud ^ieen raised by the appeUant in Uus ^ie, liable to be disnussed and is iaclludiaj SdA N-K-^gatawal Judge