In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Misc. No.M-25263 of 2008 ..... Date of decision:18.3.2009 Amarjit Singh Cheema .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent .... Present: Mr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishal Deep, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Nehra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State. ..... S.S. Saron, J. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in a case registered against him for the offence under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 registered at Police Station, Vigilance Bureau, Patiala. The petitioner was granted interim bail vide order dated 26.9.2008. On 23.1.2009, it was agreed by the counsel appearing for the respective parties that the prosecution shall serve questionnaire to the petitioner which shall be replied by him. The questionnaire (Annexure- P.10) that was served and the reply (Annexure-P.11) filed to the same were taken on record on 27.2.2009. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Sukhpal Singh, Police Station Vigilance Bureau, Patiala, has submitted that further custody of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. Cr. Misc. No.M-25263/2008 [2] Keeping in view the aforesaid position, the interim bail granted on 26.9.2008 is made absolute and shall continue till the filing of the charge-report (challan) by the Police. The criminal miscellaneous petition stands disposed of. March 18, 2009. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp*