IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1323 of 2007 SYED HUSSAIN ASHRAF Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 14.8.2008 This application has been filed against judgement of acquittal dt. 03.09.2007 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. II, Saharsa in Session Trial No. 163 of 2005. The only submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no summon or warrant was actually issued upon the witnesses and the case was closed without examination of material witnesses. Considered the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and also perused the impugned order. From the perusal of the impugned order it appears that this is a case no evidence only one formal witness was examined by the prosecution. It further appears from Para 8 of the judgement that charge was framed on 3.9.2005 and judgment was delivered after 2 years on 3.9.2007. During that period several steps were taken by the court for examination of material witnesses but without any success. Under the facts and circumstances, I find no merit in this revision. Accordingly the same is dismissed at admission stage. M K Chy/ ( Ghanshyam Prasad, J)