IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7893 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision : 13.01.2010 Vimla Devi .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Charu Tuli, Sr.DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 2.11.2006 (Annexure P-4) whereby the benefit of pay fixation earlier granted to her at par with her junior vide order dated 24.7.1997, has been withdrawn. The respondents have filed their written statement wherein it is averred that the matter has again been reconsidered on a representation made by the petitioner and vide order dated 1.1.2010 (Annexure R-1), the pay of the petitioner has been fixed at par with her junior from 13.10.1978. In view of the afore-stated order dated 1.1.2010, the writ C.W.P.No .7893 of 2007 (O&M) 2 petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits and rightly so that as a result of refixation of pay w.e.f. 13.10.1978, the petitioner would be entitled to consequential monetary benefits including revised retiral benefits. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents to grant the necessary consequential benefits to the petitioner in terms of the afore-mentioned orders dated 22.12.2009/1.1.2010 within a period of 4 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Dasti. 13-01-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE