:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.812 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL NO.812 OF 2008 TAX APPEAL NO.812 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, ..Appellant Vs. M/s.New Vinod Silk Mills Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, S.J.KATHAWALLA, S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 2ND SEPTEMBER, 2008 : 2ND SEPTEMBER, 2008 : 2ND SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. We have perused the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 11th September,2006. In paragraph No.3, the Tribunal had considered the judgment of our High Court in the case of Parekh Parekh Parekh Traders Traders Traders Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, 150 ITR 310 Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, 150 ITR 310 Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, 150 ITR 310 with regard to the similar issue involved in the present Appeal. In view thereof, we do not find any substantial question of law involved in the present Appeal. Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)