IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25385 of 2008 MD.NURUL & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR For the Petitioners:- Mr. Najeeb Ahmad, Advocate For the State:- Mr. C. Jawahar, A.P.P. ----------- 02 29.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are facing prosecution under Sections 498A, 323, 406 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 /4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 is Father-in-law, whereas petitioner No.2 is the Mother-in-law of the complainant. Further submission is that the allegations are general and omnibus against all the accused persons. There is nothing specific against these petitioners in the complaint. Learned counsel for the State submits that there is allegation of demand of dowry and torture by the petitioners. In the aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners namely Md. Nurul and Bibi Sakila, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of this order, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistratee, Katihar in connection with Complaint Case No. 2379 of 2007 - 2 - subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. P.K. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)