IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. APP (U/S) No.6 of 2011 Syeda Khatoon Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 2. 13.7.2011 Heard Shri Ajay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant in support of the present appeal which has been filed to assail the order of acquittal dated 21.9.2010 passed by the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in Complaint Case No. 1848 of 2007. Without going into the merits of the acquittal order, suffice it to mention that the learned trial Magistrate has discussed the gist of evidence in paragraph 14 of the judgment and has made reference to the relevant part of the evidence of the complainant and her witnesses including her father and P.W.1. The learned lower court has thereafter appreciated the evidence by marshalling the facts and has pointed out as to how the evidence of the complainant P.W. 2 does not get support from other witnesses or in other words how the other witnesses were making contradictory statements on important aspects of the prosecution story. I do not find any element of perversity in the order of acquittal which was passed through the impugned judgment. As such, the appeal stands dismissed at the admission stage itself. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)