IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.69 OF 2006 Sou.Neeta Santosh Pawar .. Petitioner versus Shri Santosh Uttam Pawar .. Respondent ... Mr.Dilip Bodake for the petitioner. Respondent in person. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 24th August 2006. DATED : 24th August 2006. DATED : 24th August 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr.Bodake, learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent who appears in person. 2. By this petition filed under section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, petitioner prays for transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No.A-320 of 2006 pending in the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai to the Court of Civil Judge, Sr. Division, Karad for hearing and decision. It is alleged that the petitioner herself has also filed another marriage petition bearing Hindu Marriage Petition no.57 of 2006 against the respondent for restitution of conjugal rights while the respondent has filed this petition for dissolution of marriage. 3. At the hearing, respondent appearing in person submitted before me that he has no objection for allowing the application and transferring Hindu Marriage Petition No.a-320 of 2006 from the Family Court at Bandra to the Court of Civil Judge, Sr.Division, Karad as the said place is stated to be convenient to the wife. He however denies the allegations made in the application. he tenders a written say regarding his ’No objection’ for transfer. The say is taken on record and marked ’X’ for identification. 4. In view of the consent, petition is allowed. Hindu Marriage Petition No.A-320 of 2006 pending the Family Court at Mumbai is withdrawn from the said file and is transferred to the Court of Civil Judge, Sr. Division Karad for disposal in accordance with law. (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J)