1 cr-wp-1819-10 jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 1819 OF 2010 Santosh Pandurang Karande ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent .... Ms. Nasreen S.K.Ayubi Advocate appointed for petitioner Mr. D.P.Adsule A.P.P. for the Respondent-State .... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND M.N.GILANI, JJ. DATED : MARCH 23, 2011 PER COURT: 1 A communication sent by the petitioner through jail has been registered as Criminal Writ Petition. In the said communication the petitioner challenges the acquittal of the respondents-accused in Special Case No. 1 of 2005. The judgment acquitting the respondents-accused came to be delivered on 13th April, 2006 by the 3rd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur acquitting the respondents therein for offence punishable under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Section 7(1)(d) of the Protection of 2 cr-wp-1819-10 Civil Rights Act and Sections 147, 148, 324 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. Since this petition was registered, this Court had appointed advocate Mrs. Nasreen Ayubi as a counsel to represent the petitioner in this petition. 2 We have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. Obviously no appeal could have been maintainable at the behest of the present petitioner who was the complainant on whose report the said offences came to be registered. In a writ petition and particularly since the State has not chosen to file any appeal questioning the correctness of the acquittal of the respondents- accused, no interference in the order of acquittal is possible. Writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. 3 Registry to inform this order to the petitioner who is serving sentence in jail. [ M.N.GILANI, J. ] [ P.V.HARDAS, J. ]