IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44779 of 2008 SAROJ SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.11.2008 Heard Sri Kamaldeo Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The house of the petitioner was searched which was meant to store fodder. A country made rife of .315 bore was recovered. The contention was that the house was joint and that it was such a place which could not be assigned to the specific individual conscious knowledge of the petitioner. The further contention is that the petitioner is an Advocate’s Clerk and was not present on the day of the incident in his house. Absence from the house on the day of seizure does not appear of much consequence. The significance is of the place being meant only for storing fodder and that it could be so uncared as to be accessible on sundry, considering which, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Obra P.S.Case No.44 of 2007. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )