:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT CONTEMPT CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 20 OF 2009 PETITION NO. 20 OF 2009 PETITION NO. 20 OF 2009 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2149 OF PETITION NO. 2149 OF PETITION NO. 2149 OF 2008 2008 2008 Rajendra Pundlikrao Godshalwar. ... Petitioner. V/s. The M.C.G.M. & Ors. ... Respondents. And The M.C.G.M. & Ors. ... Contemnors. Mr. Dhond, Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kadam, Shobha Khavanekar and Apeksha Sharma i/b. Kadam and Company for the Petitioner. Mr. Pakale a/w. Ms. T. Puranik for Respondent No.1 - B.M.C. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 26TH 26TH 26TH FEBRUARY 2009. FEBRUARY 2009. FEBRUARY 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Mr. Pakale, learned Advocate appearing for the Corporation states that the Corporation has passed an order on 18th February 2009 in respect of the structure/construction and in pursuance of this order, necessary action in accordance with law including for demolition of this construction will be initiated. He states that Mr. Shinde, Assistant Engineer, ‘K’ West Ward is personally present in Court and has instructed him to make the above statement. He states that not only with regard to the construction which is subject matter of the order dated 18th February 2009 but any other construction which is unauthorised will be dealt with and demolished by due process of law without any directions and orders from this Court. In the light of this statement, the Contempt Petition is dismissed. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)