IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.564 OF 2009 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.1048 OF 2008 CONNECTED WITH COMAPNY APPLICATION NO.1090 OF 2008 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.228 OF 1987 WITH COMPANY PETITION NO.735 2004 IN BIFR CASE NO.57 OF 1987 Shri Homi Framroze Mehta & Anr. ...Petitioners V/s. The Official Liquidator ...Respondents And Shri Homi Framroze Mehta & Anr. ...Applicants ...... Mr.P.V.Shah for Applicants. Mr.S.Ramakantha, Dy.Official Liquidator is present. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MAY 8, 2009. MAY 8, 2009. MAY 8, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Applicants as well as the representative of the Official Liquidator. The Representative of the Official Liquidator has : 2 : invited my attention to Paragraph 8 of the affidavit dated 8th May 2009 which mentions that there are other shareholders of the Company in liquidation who are holding more than one share and that the Applicants have not stated any reason in their affidavit for proposed substitution. 2. The objection taken in the reply affidavit clearly overlooks the assertion made in Paragraph 10 of the affidavit in support of the Application. The fact that there are other shareholders of the Company in liquidation who are holding more than one share does not preclude the Applicant No.2 to apply for being impleaded as one of the Petitioners along with original Petitioner No.1. 3. In the circumstances, this Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendment be carried out within four weeks from today. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.