1 SBCW NO. 2957/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2957/2009 Ravi Raj Choudhary Vs. State of Rajasthan and Another Date of Order : : 08.04.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. Pankaj Sharma for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents advertised the post vide advertisement No.1/07-08 Annex.3 dated 11.5.2007 and the petitioner applied in pursuance thereof, however, the petitioner's candidature came to be rejected vide Annex.8 dated 23.3.2009 on the ground that the petitioner does not possess the requisite advertised qualification i.e. BE (Computer Engineering) or equivalent as recognized by the State Govt. The petitioner failed to show that he possessed the qualification of BE (Computer Engineering), however, according to the petitioner, he possessed the qualification of BE (Information and Technology) and All India for Technical Education has recognized the BE (Information and Technology) 2 SBCW NO. 2957/2009 equivalent to the BE (Engineering). Be that as it may, the advertisement prescribes the qualification of BE (Computer Engineering) or equivalent recognized by the State Govt. and in the instant case, the State Government has not recognized the BE (Information & Technology) as equivalent to BE (Computer Engineering). In this view of the matter, counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to represent the State Govt. for such recognition or equivalence. In view of the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner represent the State Govt. and if such a representation is made, the State shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. (H.R. PANWAR), J. rp 3 SBCW NO. 2957/2009 S.B.Civil Misc. Stay Petition No. 5017/09 In S.B.Civil Writ petition No. 2957/09 Date of Order : 08/04/2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. Pankaj Sharma for the petitioner. Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of, the stay petition stands disposed of. (H.R. PANWAR), J. rp