1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10141 OF 2009 Shri Balkrishna Vnayak Kulkarni ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra &Ors. ... Respondents Shri A.M.Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 10th December, 2009. P.C. 1. The petitioner had approached the High Power Committee to contend that his name should also be included in the SRA Project. His application has been rejected on the ground that the name of the appellant was not shown on the electoral roll as on 1.1.1995 and as such the petitioner is not eligible. 2. At the hearing on behalf of the petitioner, the learned Counsel seeks to show us some documents to indicate that material was placed before the High Power Committee, but the Committee has not considered the same. It is 2 submitted that omission of name in the electoral roll by itself is not sufficient to reject the case of the petitioner. 3. We asked the learned Counsel for the petitioner to show us at least the photo pass. The learned Counsel fairly admits that there is no photo pass, but there are some applications which may indicate that he has applied for photo pass 4. In the light of that, we are not inclined to interfere in exercise of our Extraordinary Jurisdiction. However, if the petitioner is able to get the photo pass issued, then, it will be open to him to re-apply to the High Power Committee. With the above observations, the Petition is disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)