IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.17845 of 2010 VISHNU RAM @ BISHNU RAM s/o Late Ram Barai Ram, r/o Mohalla- Shivpuri, P.S. Kazi Mohammadpur, District- Muzaffarpur …Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Anant Kumar @ Mithu S/o Chandeshwar Prasad Chaudhary R/o village- Daryapur Kafen, P.S. Kudhni, District- Muzaffarpur …Opposite Parties ----------- 2/ 02.02.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 13.4.2010 passed by the 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, in Sessions Trial No.483 of 2009, by which the petitioner’s application under sections 227 and 228 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge against the petitioner should have been viewed on the basis of the decision reported in (2006) 8 SCC 560 (Tarkeshwar Sahu Vs. The State of Bihar). In my view, the trial court is always at liberty to amend the charge subsequently during trial if the evidence forthcoming so warrants. Therefore, I see no justification to interfere with the order impugned. The application is dismissed. JA/- ( Anjana Prakash,J.)