1 Wp2053.11 Kambli IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2053 OF 2011 ... Mrs.Rajlaxmi Vishnu Angarkhe ...Petitioner v/s. State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents ... Mr.R.K.Mendadkar for the Petitioner. Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, AGP for State. Mr.A.S.Rao for Respondent No.4. Mr.A.A.Garge for Respondent No.5. ... CORAM: D.K.Deshmukh & Anoop V. Mohta, JJ DATED: 2nd May, 2011 P.C.: The order impugned in the petition is admittedly passed by the Scrutiny Committee at Nagpur. Therefore, as per the provisions of the State Organisation Act and the Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, the Petition will lie in Nagpur Bench of this Court. The contention of the Petitioner that because the caste certificate is used against the Petitioner at Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation, which is within the jurisdiction of the Principal Seat the petition will lie here has 2 Wp2053.11 no substance. Because the order impugned is passed by the Scrutiny Committee which is within the jurisdiction of Nagpur Bench of this court. Therefore, we put it to the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner whether he is willing withdraw the petition so that he can file the same before the Nagpur Bench of this Court, but he declined to do so. Hence, we have no option, but to reject the same. Petition is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.)