1 ca5459.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5459 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 4386 OF 2010 [Murlidhar Ramnarayan Chechani & Anr. vs. Narayandas s/o Raghunathdas Chechani died LRs. Ramprasad s/o Narayandas Chechani & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. A.A. Phatale, Advocate h/f Mr. D.P. Palodkar, Advocate for the applicants. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 17TH DECEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned Counsel for the applicants. In spite of service on respondents, none appears for them. 2. Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that, the legal heirs of deceased respondent NO.1 were already brought on record before the lower appellate Court. He invited my attention to para-3 and 4 of the 2 ca5459.10 application and submitted that, delay deserves to be condoned. 3. Perused the contents of the application. In the light of averments in para-1 to 4 of the Civil Application, delay deserves to be condoned. Delay stands condoned. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) (B) (C) and (D), same stands disposed of. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/DEC11