IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 225 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 106 OF 2003 SHRI NARAYAN RAM SHET SHIRODKAR, PONDA-GOA. ... Applicant Versus DR. RAJIV FONDU GUDE, BOMBAY. ... Respondent Ms. Sapna Mordekar, Advocate for the applicant. Respondent in person - absent. Coram:- R. S. MOHITE, J. Date:- 18th October, 2007 P.C. It appears that repairs have already been carried out and the beam which was broken has been replaced. 2. By my order dated 27.9.07, I had permitted the respondent in person to take inspection of the property on 28.9.07. The matter was to be listed on 12.10.07. After the inspection, the respondent in person has filed his reply listing the changes. Today the respondent is absent. 3. Since the repairs have been carried out, the Misc. Civil Application is disposed off, with liberty to the respondent in person to file his own application, if he has any specific grievance. R. S. MOHITE, J. ssm.