IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 857 OF 2006 Bindu Shailen Mewar ... Petitioner V/s. The Municipal Corporation of ... Respondent Greater Bombay & Ors. Mr. S.C. Naidu with Mr. R.A. Rodriques, Mr. B.A. Gade & Mr. S.I. Menon for the petitioner. Mrs. P.A. Purandare for respondent No. 1 & 2 Mr. R.M. Sawant, Govt. Pleader for respondent No.3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, : F.I. REBELLO, : F.I. REBELLO, ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 29th March, 2006 : 29th March, 2006 : 29th March, 2006 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. We had passed an order yesterday. The limited issue is that Regulation 67 itself provides for an application to the Municipal Commissioner. That has been done but has not yet been disposed of. Considering the above, we direct the competent authority under Regulation to dispose of the application within four weeks from today. 3. Rule made absolute with no order as to costs. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] ( 2 ) [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]