WPMS No. 1834 of 2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By means of the petition, the petitioners have prayed a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 29.06.2009 passed by District Judge, Dehradun. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner moved an application before the District Judge, Dehradun for withdrawal of money, which was deposited in the form of F.D.R. as per order dated 30.03.1999 passed by M.A.C.T./District Judge, Dehradun. The learned District Judge dismissed the same vide order dated 29.06.2009 as the petitioner could not attain the age of majority as on date. Feeling aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the petitioner has preferred this petition before this Court. Heard Sri Promod Belwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. Having considered the submission advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the entire record available before me, I do not find any illegality in the impugned order passed by the court below. The learned District Judge has rightly rejected the application of the petitioner for withdrawal of money in favour of the petitioner. The court below considering the claim petition wherein the age of the petitioner was 4 years at the time of filing the claim petition, which was filed in the year 1996, come to the conclusion that the age of the petitioner is 17 years as on date. I do not find any ground to interfere in the impugned order passed by the court below. The petition lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in- limine. (B.C.K., J.) 03.11.2009 ASWAL