IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No.31762 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision : 29.11.2011 Anguri Devi ....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana ....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr.Rakesh Bakshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.66 dated 16.04.2011 registered under Section 120-B, 302, 201 IPC, at Police Station Chhappar. On 19.10.2011, the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel has argued that even as per the FIR, the only role attributed to the petitioner is that the main accused consulted with her before putting the deceased on fire and she has now been in custody for five months.” Apart from that, learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the allegations are that the son of the petitioner was having illicit relations Criminal Misc.No.31762 of 2011(O&M) -2- with the wife of the deceased and due to that the wife of the deceased set the deceased on fire. Wife of the deceased as well as the son of the petitioner (lover) are in custody. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions of ASI Om Parkash, has accepted the factual assertion. In this view of the matter, without commenting on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner. Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI) November 29, 2011 JUDGE mamta