IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21862 of 2008 1. SAIDA KHATOON 2. MD. ALI 3. MAJEDA KHAQTOON 4. MUMEDA KHATOON 5. RUBEDA KHATOON 6. MAQSED 7. TARA KHATOON Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 07.11.2008 Learned counsel is permitted to correct the typographical error in the prayer portion of the application. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a Police case registered under Sections 363, 366 of the Penal Code. Alleging false implication, it is submitted that petitioners 3 to 7 are not even named in the first information report. The alleged victim girl in her statement recorded in paragraph 25 of the case diary has stated that it was co-accused Md. Halim and Noor Alam who allegedly took her away by force when no overt or positive act has been alleged against the aforesaid petitioners, who are ladies and minor children. Despite the statement of the alleged victim girl of attempted rape by Md. Halim charge sheet has been submitted under Section 376 of the Penal Code. The submission on behalf of petitioners 1 & 2 is that apart from naming them in the first information report, they are similarly situated as petitioners 3 to 7 in other aspects. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the 2 case, let the petitioners, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Katihar in Barsoi (Kachna) P.S. case No.17 of 2006, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)