IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2008 / 26TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 17265 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. T.PHILOMINA @ LEENA, W/O.LATE A.C.JOB, AGED 62, ALINGAL HOUSE, PONNARIMANGALAM, MULAVUKKAD 2. REGINA @ EEEVY . W/O.CYRIL AGED 60, RESIDING AT ATHIPOOZHI HOUSE,MANASSERY, MUNDAMVELI PO., KOCHI 3. LAILA @ MARY LAILA, W/O K.J.TOMY, AGED 55 RESIDING AT KURISHINGAL PONNARIMANGALAM MULAVUKKAD P.O. 4. LEIJU, S/O.PHILOMINA AGED 39, RESIDING AT ALINGAL HOUSE, PONNARIMANGALAM MULAVUKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY (REVENUE), GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD 3. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND ACQUISITION (RAILWAY), ERNAKULAM BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BASANTH BALAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(c).No.17265 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT The grievance which the petitioners are voicing in this writ petition is that inspite of specific directions given under Ext.P3 judgment of this court, the third respondent has not given them an opportunity to participate in the award enquiry. 2. Learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that the petitioners have not produced the seven documents mentioned in Ext.P5 though specific instructions were given to them to produce the documents. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that though the documents were submitted, the third respondent was unwilling to receive them. 3. Under the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of issuing the following directions; The petitioners will produce the originals of all the seven documents mentioned in Ext.P5 before the third respondent within seven days from today. If those documents are produced, the third WPC.No.17265/08 2 respondent will hear the petitioners regarding the correct compensation to be paid to them for the properties to be acquired and then only pass an award. If the petitioners do not produce the documents as directed above within the time limit, the third respondent is permitted to pass an award depositing the amount with the competent court so that the court can ultimately decide the petitioners' entitlement to the compensation determined. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE sv. WPC.No.17265/08 2