IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2010 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1932 RP.No. 1062 of 2010(M) --------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.27929/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------------------------------------ M/S.GEE CANS, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, S.M.REMESH, MANUFACTURERS OF COMPOSITE CANS, 1017 D, TENKASI ROAD, RAJAPALAYAM-626117, TAMIL NADU. BY ADV. SRI.S.KRISHNAMOORTHY RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS ------------------------------------------------- 1. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEVASWOM BUILDING, NANDANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANDANCODE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P. No. 1062 of 2010 in W.P.(C). No.27929 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of December, 2010. ORDER Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J, We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner in extenso on different aspects of the matter including the nature of the constitution of the firm and other matters. We have rendered the judgment sought to be reviewed on the basis of the decision taken by the Devaswom Commissioner. We do not find, nor is it pointed out, that the impugned order is fundamentally erroneous or suffers from any error apparent on the face of the record. We do not find any ground to review the impugned judgment. We are also not inclined to vacate any particular finding, since without the findings, the order would not stand. The review petition is dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner further made a request that it may be clarified that the findings would not bind the petitioner RP.1062/10. 2 in the next year. We are not prepared to say anything, since the terms on which the Devaswom Board may invite tenders next year, are not on record. Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Judge P. Bhavadasan, Judge sb.