&^ &• A ff- HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARH.BK.ASPUR WritPetition(S)No.7362of2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 2 3. TikamRamYadavagedabout34year, Asst. Teacher, S/o Shri Chedilaf Yadav Govt. PrimarySchool Marjadpur, Block Bemetara, District Durg(CG) Versus StateGovt. of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, TribafWelfareDepartment&Education Department, DKS Bhawan, District Raipur(CG) District Education Officer, Bemetara, Distirrt Durg(CG) Block EducationOffieer, Bemetara,District Durg(C.G.) WRTr PETITION UNDERARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTION OF WDIA ADDearanc6: ShriSomkantVerma.counsel forthe petitioner. Shri Pradeep Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. ORALORDER (12.12.2007) SUNIL KUMARSINHA. J Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits ttiat the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitted to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initiat appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. He submits that the issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56others Vs. State of M.P. and others), wherein, it was hetd that the similarty situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of jnitial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'bte Supreme Court in Speciat Leave Petition (CMI) No.6892/93. Thesaid petition wasdismissed bythe Hon'bte SupremeCourt upholding the decision ofthe Tribunat tothe effectthatthe \^ WP(S)736M007 II f Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment Learned counset for the petitioner further submitslhat this Court, white considering the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu and others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another (W.P.(S) No.813 of 2007) by orderdated 12.2.2007, has granted regular payseate w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submits that this ease Is squarely covered bythe decision of this Court inthe case of Ram Kumar Sahu and another (supra). In view ofthat, this petition is allowed in the same terms. However, ttiis order shall be subject to att veriflcations made bythe State regardingfacts pleaded inthepetition. suntta Sd/- Sunil Kumar Siiiha Judge /.•*wi—»v,uy(j^or'