IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C. Review No. 118 of 2011 Decided on: 2.12.2011 Deep Ram and others …Petitioners Versus Sh. Swarup Chand and another …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioners : Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate vice counsel. For the respondents : Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate vice counsel. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : CMP(M) No. 1149 of 2011 Heard. There is no cogent and convincing reason assigned in the present application for condonation of delay in filing the review petition. Consequently, the present application is dismissed. C. Review No. 118 of 2011 In view of the order passed in CMP(M) No. 1149 of 2011 for condonation of delay in filing the present review petition, the same is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the present review petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma). Judge. December 2, 2011 (kalpana) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?