IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36803 of 2009 1. LAKHAN MISTRY 2. ASHOK MISTRI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 15.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Nobody appears on behalf of the State. Petitioners, who are father and son, have approached this Court seeking regular bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Section 307 of the Penal Code. It is contended that the allegation in the F.I.R. is general and omnibus. Referring to annexure-3, it has been contended that petitioner no.1 also received injury on the head for which a substantive case was lodged by him against the prosecution side. Referring to annexure-4, it is contended that parties are next door neighbours and they have entered into a compromise. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instruction, submits that petitioners are in custody since 01.06.2009. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM Gaya in connection with Tekari P.S.Case no. 127 of 2009, subject to the following conditions: 1. One of the bailors should be the 2 own/close family member of the petitioners. 2. In the event the case reaches up to the level of framing of charge, the petitioners shall thereafter appear in person before the Court below on each date fixed therein. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Court below shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond(s) of the petitioners and secure their arrest in accordance with law. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)