- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3884/2009 1. Chimbhala Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Society Ltd. Chimbhala Tq.Shrigonda Dist.Ahmednagar. Through its Chairman Pandit Bhagwan Gaikwad. 2. Shivajirao Appaji Gaikwad, age 54 yrs., occu.agri., 3. Ramesh Babasaheb Gaikwad, age 40 yrs., occu.agri., 4. Lahanu Dhaigude, age 43 yrs., occu.agri., 5. Laxman Khanderao Sawant, age 41 yrs., occu.agri., 6. Sau.Aajanabai Shivaji Gaikwad, age 56 yrs., occu.agri., 7. Dattatraya Sitaram Gaikwad, age 51 yrs., occu.agri., 8. Raosaheb Bapusaheb Gaikwad, age 42 yrs., occu.agri., 9. Nathu Chandrakant Shirole, age 36 yrs., occu.agri., All r/o Chimbhala Tq.Shrigonda Dist.Ahmednagar. ...Petitioners.. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary, Cooperation, Marketing, Textiles and De-addiction Activities, Maharashtra State, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32. - 2 - 2. The Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Nashik Division, Nashik. 3. The Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Shrigonda Tq.Shrigonda Dist.Ahmednagar. ...Respondents... ..... Shri V.D. Hon, Advocate for petitioners. Shri K.G. Patil, AGP for respondents. ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & R.K. DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE: 25.06.2009 ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per Hardas, J.): 1] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2] We have heard Shri V.D. Hon, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri K.G. Patil, learned AGP for respondents, who accepts the notice on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 3. 3] The petitioners by this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have prayed for issuance of a writ directing the respondents not to execute or give effect to an adverse order, if passed in Revision No.178/2008, likely to be decided by the first respondent, for a period of four weeks from the service of such order on the petitioners. - 3 - 4] In the light of the limited relief, which is sought for by the petitioners in this petition, we deem it appropriate to hear this petition finally at this stage. 5] Shri Hon, the learned counsel for the petitioners, has invited our attention to a series of orders of similar nature passed in favour of the petitioners in the various disputes, which were pending then. With the assistance of the learned counsel for the parties, we have perused those orders and in the peculiar facts of the present case, we, therefore, allow this petition and direct that in the event an adverse order is passed against the petitioners in Revision No.178/2008 by the first respondent, the said order shall not be implemented / given effect to for a period of four weeks to enable the petitioners to avail the remedies available in law for challenging the said order. Rule made absolute on the above terms with no order as to costs. (R.K. Deshpande,J.) (P.V. Hardas, J.) ndk/c256096