*1* 18-chs-267-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION srj CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.267 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO.167 OF 2010 ALONGWITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.214 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO.167 OF 2010 Zubedabai S. Suratwala & Others .. Plaintiffs V/s. Mohammedali M. Sali & Others .. Defendants And Rajaram Chavan Real Estate Pvt.Ltd., .. Applicants. Mr. K.L.Ganesh Rao, i/b. N.D.Rao, for Plaintiffs. Ms. Neeta Jain i/b. Ashok Purohit, for Applicants. Mr. H. Rathattha i/b. RMG Law Associates, for Defendant Nos.1 & 2. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 7th December, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant in support of the Chamber Summons. The Advocate for the Plaintiffs state *2* 18-chs-267-10 that he has no objection to the applicant being impleaded as Defendant to the suit. 2 My attention is invited by the Advocate for the Applicants to the reliefs claimed in the plaint by the Plaintiffs and particularly the parts of the prayers challenging the joint development agreement. The Advocate for the Applicants submits that the joint development agreement is executed between Defendant No.1 and the Applicants. Therefore, if, that agreement is going to be subject matter of challenge, then the Applicants would be affected by any order in the suit. 3 In such circumstances and that the Applicants’ rights would be affected, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 4 Amendment to be carried out in terms of the schedule, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. 5 The Notice of Motion is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh motion after amendment is carried out. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)