IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4519 and 4460 of 2010 Between: Avula Bhaskar Reddy and another ..... PETITIONER(S) AND Mannem Appi Reddy and others .....RESPONDENT(S) HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4519 and 4460 of 2010 ORDER: Since these two revisions arise out of same parties and virtually involve common question, they are being taken up together for disposal. Petitioners, who are plaintiffs, filed these revisions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking to assail the correctness of the order dismissing the applications purported to have been filed by them with a prayer to reopen and recall P.W.1 and permit them to adduce further evidence on their behalf and, consequently, dismissing the other application filed under Order VII Rule 14(3) of CPC with a prayer to permit them to file the documents enclosed thereto and mark them in evidence on their behalf by condoning the delay if any. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner. Perused the material available on record. As rightly observed by the Court below, those applications have been filed after commencement of the arguments. Therefore, having regard to the discretion exercised by the Court below, I do not find any merit in these revisions and hence the same are liable to be dismissed. Therefore, both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J 1st October, 2010 CVRK