IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2940 of 2011 YOGENDRA SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506,354 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3(xi)(x) and (xiii) of the S.C./S.T.(Prevention of Atrocities)Act. It is alleged against the petitioner to have abused by catching holds the hair of the informant. The F.I.R. reflects that the informant went to police station with Shiv Sada. When the police also lodged a case against the petitioner for an occurrence of 18.04.2010 at the instance of Shiv Sada whereas the present case was lodged on 20.04.2010. The accusations are more or less the same in both cases. It is submitted that accusation under the S.C./ S.T.(Prevention of Atrocities)Act has not been found to be true. It appears that the F.I.R. does 2 not bear the signature of the informant. Absence of the signature of the informant in the F.I.R. clouds the whole accusation. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with S.C./S.T. Begusarai P.S. Case No.77 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Begusarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)