IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8289 of 2011 Date of Decision : October 11, 2011 Rajinder Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others … Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Dewakar Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R. K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondents-State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner claims the benefit of ad-hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgments of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, titled as Sita Ram vs. State of H.P. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, along with the representation and a copy of the writ 2 petition as well as a copy of the judgment referred to above, by the petitioner. 2. The writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. October 11, 2011 (PK/C)