1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3363 of 2009 (Mohan s/o Pandharinath Bhole vs. The State of Maharashtra) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. R.V.Gore, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. V.D.Godbharle, APP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 9/10/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. The accused/applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in Crime No. 265/2009, registered at Mukundwadi Police Station, Aurangabad, for the offense punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 448, 504, 34 of IPC. 3. Mr. R.V.Gore, Counsel, submits, the wife of the accused in whose name property is transferred is released by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First 2 Class, the two employees of the Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad, who allegedly coordinated manipulation of the document, are also released on bail. According to the Counsel, accused did not participate in preparing the document and as it is a matter of civil nature and custodial interrogation of the accused/applicant not desired. 4. At this stage of the matter, the privotal role in the concert of getting immoveable property of an owner, who was away from the city, impersonating somebody, in the name of the owner and got the property effected in the name of wife of the present accused/applicant, is to be ascertained. Present applicant did accompany his wife to threaten the watchman and saw to it that forcible possession of the premises is taken. Custodial interrogation will resolve the controversy. 3 Application rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/3363-09crapl