IN £L Is Ott WUi! OF KA&IAi!KA A’ SNGALOrIk fLD TIlL 1321 uaY OF JANTJAnI 1a98 £tt 0 IND H0N’3LS LiI{ JT$ CL H.N. NANAMAI DerEmma, Aged about 37 years, L/o Patel Nanegowda, No 1175, Pandavapura Town, ri rang patna. Mandya District. (By .ri. B. Kanunath, Adv.) i. pate 1 Chandrashekar Cc’a, /o Late Patel Nanjegowc’ , Devegowdanakoppal, PandavaPura Taluk, arirang’toatna, Mandya District. 2 Szt, Savithramtna, /o Late patci Nanjegowd , 3. nt. Kamsi na, /o Late Patel ianegowaa, 4, 3r1. Fadnarajegowoa, /o tate Patei Nanjegowda, . leanonuents, contd,2 • Petitioner, 5. rnt. Rathnarnma, 6. ‘rnt, Lak.shnam.m•, 7. Sri, £hanrnegowda, 8 C.H. Krishnegowda, S/o Honnegowda, Residing at Chikkad•e Village, Srirangapataa Mandya DIstrIct. 9. Smt, Nanjwnrna, Aged about 55 years D/o lath Patel Nan3egowds, ResIding at £ hyagaraja Colony, dth Division, Pandavapura Town, Kandya District. ..Respondents, (By Sri. H.C. Shivaramu for 11—8), Cjvl Rtnslon Peit Ion is nseu U/. £15 of C.P,C, against ted order dated 10.12.97 passed in .L M.L No.2/94 on the file of the Pti Judge’ flsmssing the appeal and coaVirming the order passed. in 0,5, No.68/93 dt.1.1.94 by the Civil Judge, Srrangapatna, 1 hi;s Civil RaVisionPetitionooming on for miss1on this day, the Court made the following: Petltjonerts counsel absent, The •vision is directed against tte concurnnt findings of the court below in granting an order of injunction against the peti ti onerdefendant. No ground to admit the revision petition. Revision is dismissed. Sd! - jiIiJG, A,by: MR. ‘V V7 baagaiaa. I — 44 Vt F / 4 I