- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6820/2010 Jaymalhar Pratisthan, Latur, through its Secretary, Jivan Nivrutti Karde, age 32 yrs., occu.Advocate r/o Laxmi Colony, Latur. ...Petitioner.. Versus 1] The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, School Education Department, Government of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2] The Director of Education, Maharashtra State, Pune. 3] The Dy.Director of Education, Latur, Region Latur. ...Respondents... ..... Shri S.P. Urgunde, Advocate for petitioner. Smt.A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. ..... - 2 - CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE: 30.07.2010 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Hardas, J.): 1] Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2] By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for issuance of a writ directing the respondents to decide the proposal of the petitioner dated 12.5.2008. In the light of pendency of the said proposal, therefore, we allow this petition an direct the respondents to decide the proposal of the petitioner, if pending, in accordance with law within a period of two months from today and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (N.D. Deshpande, J.) (P.V. Hardas, J.) ndk/c3071015