:1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE DISTRICT : CONTEMPT PETITION NO.144 OF 2008 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s of Coral, appearances, Court’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders --------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Vishwasrao Deodar for the Petitioner. Ms.Mhaispurkar, GAP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 15TH APRIL, 2008 P.C : P.C : P.C : 1. There is a delay in compliance with the order dated 4th December, 2007. However, no action in contempt is called for. 2. The order has been complied with inasmuch as a decision has been taken. A copy of the decision dated 3rd April, 2008 is tendered in Court. The same is taken on record and marked ‘X’. :2: 3. It is contended that the decision is incorrect inasmuch as the question of the date of birth was directed to be decided irrespective of whether the rules permit the same beyond the period of two years. 4. At least of the purpose of this Contempt Petition, the least that can be said is that this is not clear from the order dated 4th December, 2007. The order does not in terms state that the question must be decided irrespective of the rules. No application for speaking to the minutes of the order has been filed so far before the Division Bench. 5. If the Petitioner is aggrieved by the decision, it is always open to him to challenge the same in accordance with law. 6. The Contempt Petition stands disposed of accordingly.