IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6035 of 2009 Between: Vaka Pardhasaradhi Reddy. ... PETITIONER AND Vaka Jayarathnamma. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. T.C. KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent : -NA- The Court made the following: ORDER: The revision is directed against the order dated 30.11.2009 dismissing I.A.No.890 of 2009 in I.A.No.831 of 2009 in O.S.No.253 of 2009. 2. Petitioner herein is the defendant in a suit for injunction. The petitioner filed an application in I.A.No.890 of 2009 in I.A.No.831 of 2009 in O.S.No.253 of 2009 seeking to implead five pattadars/owners as party respondents to the said IA. The suit O.S.No.253 of 2009 is filed seeking permanent injunction against the petitioner and I.A.No.831 of 2009 is filed seeking temporary injunction against the petitioner. The trial Court dismissed the said application on the ground that the respondent/plaintiff did not suffer any interference from the said proposed parties and as such, did not implead them in the suit. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. The suit and the application in question being for injunction simplicitor, the petitioner, who is defendant in the suit cannot force the plaintiff to fight out the litigation against third parties. The plaintiff being dominus litus apparently does not want any relief against the said proposed parties. The application for impleadment of third parties moved by the petitioner was, therefore, rightly dismissed by the Court below. The revision petition, therefore, is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J February 26, 2010 DSK