IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.3756 of 2010 Date of Decision: 28.5.2010 Jarnail Singh ..Petitioner. Vs. M/s Shiv Ram Darbara Singh ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Balkar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 3.3.2010 vide which property in dispute has been put to sale on 22.5.2010. Firstly, the petitioner is not an aggrieved party as it is alleged that property in dispute, which is sought to be sold, is owned and possessed by his wife and son, who have not come forward to file any objection against the proposed sale and secondly, the revision petition is filed on the day when the property is to be fixed for sale i.e. 28.5.2010. Hence, I do not find any merit in this revision petition. Dismissed. (Rakesh Kumar Jain) 28.5.2010 Judge Meenu