IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16738 of 2008 CHANDRA SHEKHAR NARAYAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 27-10-2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner came to this Court earlier against his order of punishment when this Court disposed off C.W.J.C.No.992 of 2005 granting him liberty to approach the authorities on the quantum of punishment. The punishment imposed is a minor punishment. The grievance of the petitioner is despite having represented on quantum vide Annexure-8 dated 15.12.2007 the same remains undisposed. Learned counsel for the State submits from the counter affidavit that the representation was not filed before the proper authority. The objection of the Respondents appears to be highly technical to this Court. Learned counsel for the State very fairly acknowledges that once the petitioner has filed his representation in pursuance of certain orders of this Court and a copy of the representation is appended to the writ application also, it is now for the appropriate of authority to dispose off the representation. The writ application is disposed with a direction to the appropriate authority to dispose of the representation of the petitioner with regard to the quantum of punishment as appended in Annexure-8 - 2 - within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. At the risk repetition it is reiterated that this order has been passed in presence of the learned counsel for the State. NKS/- ( Navin Sinha, J)