IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS / ,/' ^' W.P. NO../.Jr^4/2003 Abhay Asthana i/0 Shri D.P. Asthana aged about 44 years Sub Engineer. (E/M) Posted in the office of Executive Engineer, P.H.E. (E/M) Bilaspur (c.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Department of Publie Health Engineering D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Undaon of India :'hrough Director Department of Personael and Training, Ministry of Personnel Publlc Grlevances and penslon Government of India Room no. 312, Lok Nayak Bhawan , 3rd Floor, Khan Market (State Reorganisation Cell), Khan Market, New Delhi-110003 State of Madhya Pradesh ; Through the Principal Secretary Department of Public Health Engineering, Mantralaya, Vallabh.Btfawan, Btysfal (M.P.) ^IRIT PETITION U_NDER_SRTICLES 226/^_27x OF 'S«E CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPR9PR3;ATE_WRITS'oy CERTIORARI MlD^MAN- ..^y ..^•yy, <-T.^>:"" y <<> il [^.^A^^'^A ^y^^y DMiUS ETC. AND FOR T?URTHER SUITABLE ·WRITS._A.NP DIRECTIONS ! XI-HC-22 ~3^"=qT3iF?T3t ^TtTftn^ fsi<»fTy^' STI^T^T R-li* sfSw sft^i^ -yJ?Tt •STT^T 'VW (^.(7.^0.1^4fc *<IHWI aitiii* """""" """"""""""^ 2003 'fN^ET' sn^cs^aiw^ifCT 11.7.2003 Petitioner(5) by Shri San< State by Shri Rajesh Pan' ShriV.V.S. Murthy, Addlj Counsel for the Union of India. Shrl R.S. Jha, Deputy Ac M-P. . Heard fina^ly. Coi-insel for the petitioi supplied fhe copies of the coLUisel for tlie Stale of C.G./' However, one extra acknowlcdgcmcnts thcrcof bc Counsel for the petitionej are squarely covered by fh( 'W.P.No.2353/2002 (Mahcsh K|i and ofhers) dedded on 28.4.) prders may be passed tnfhes^ is stated that the statemer<t venficatfon. i n < Counscl fbr t3ic£re^)ond4iits ^iasre approached tjelatedly an^ ^rafei'N'WRif'S •feIA'(fe^re ^ si1;3»rSIK^T (eep Dubey, advocate. tley, GovejTument Advocate. Central'Govemment Standing vocate General for the State of (lers submits that they have pejtitions with Annexures to the fc.P. aiid tlie Uiiiou of Iiidia. :opy be supplied and the >btaincd. :(s) submits ttiat these matters decision of this Court in imiar Tiwari Vs. Urdon oflndia 1003. They pray that siiuilar cases also aathey are similar. is made at^tliie Bar after due submit thaf'ttle petitioners it is not possible to decide the [T^^feA XI-HC-22 ^^ •<<l<flf1'!< »Ttl'Hji|S, !»t?)l'M^< STT^T 'VCSR fimi shtfrei^ "VI, 200 fsrc^t' sii^r^ir Ri-li* 5ffl^?f sw^) <8^ ^n^F ^cn^ ^ct " '2-' T>l«l]<1<fll »il*)CT~9 ftl<t tfat^K ^ sfPtiH sn^r reprRsenT.ations by t.he Central schedule as luentioned in W 28.4.22003. Counsel for the p| Govemment. within T.he time .P.No.2353/2003 decided on ititioners are not m a positlon to dispute this. They, howev4r> pray that theu- matters be considered. Accordingly, relying on tljie statement made by counsel for fhe parties on tfae instruc^tions received, as stated, the petitions are dlsposed of with W.P.No.3353/02 (Mahesh K\ India. and others) decided the observations as made m uniar Tlwari Vs. Union af »n 28.4.2003 subject to the modification that the petition^rs, if so desire, may make a detailed representation raisingj docuiueiits widuii Leii (lays| Govemment addressed to their gnevances alongwith the froiu loday to tlie CeiiLi-al the Oovemment. of Tndia, Departinent of Personnel and ifraining, Ministry ofPersonnel, Publlc Grievances and Pensl({ns, Loknayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New DeUii (State Reo be also served oa the conce 'ganisation Cell). Said copy of the representadon diily suppojrted by all relevant documents med Departmenf ;of both the StateS after obtoiiungthe Qcjmowlfidgpiiieiit and bofh the iSta^smay forwanlj^^same l|o the Central Qovemment with thefr ebininents aild the requj.site inforaiation and coinplete detaUs in oixler to cnable thctCentral Oovemraent to decide [<i®^3^ XI-HC-22 T^ -^WWI. »fll'M'!S. T3;:!TCTqT 'T- 3ff^?T tr?R7 ^,3=^^=fe^--:-" HWV\\ VhW^ "WI, 200 fa^N' sn^r^i R-ii.'* 311^1 ^lii«tt(rf?d an^t TSITW'gfer -i,- ^i^tn^'r 'HTHc^f^ f^t <F3t^.T^ ^siptwsn^t ^o/' Govemtnents nibde the representation. Tt. is oper seek such further infoi-matio] and on • such requisition b' Govemment; the State such representation being may consider aiid decide the appropriate orders as deemed wifh law. In view of the above, disposed of. Certified copy as per rulf |ro the Central Govemnienr. T.o from the State Govemnients ^ing m&de from the Ceiiti'al wUl supply the same. On ;, tiie Central Govemaient ^ame expeditiously by passing fit and proper, in accordance i(I.W-P and I-A-, if any, stand &. Sd/- Eakhruddin Judge J? ['Nt^N