IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1453 of 2009 Between: Dasari Anthony Prakash, S/o. Giri Raju (Late), A.A.E./Electrical(U/Deemed to be resigned from service), D.No. 43- 114-13, Lumbini Building, P & T Colony, Ajit Singhngar, VijayaWada. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Limited, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad-82 Rep. by its Managing Director. 2 The Chairman, AP Genco Ltd., Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad-82. 3 The Chief General Manager (Administration), AP Genco Ltd., Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad-82. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to To isuse any appropriate writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in imposing the pubishmentof Deemed to be resigned from service vide Memo No. CGM (A)/DS (A) AS (V&R) (T) / 723 / VC-3/2005, Dt. 23-03- 2006, issued by the 3rd respondent, the action of the 3rd respndent in issuing the proceedings in Memo No. CGM (A)/DS (A) / AS (V&R) (T) / 723 / VC-3/2005, Dt. 24-2-2007 and the action of the 1st respondent in not disposing of the Revision/Review petition dated 10-10-2008 as arbitrary illegal and violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitutional of India and violative of principles of natural Justice and Consequently set-a side the said proceedings dt. 23-03-2006 and 24-02-2007 issued by the 3rd respndent and direct the respondents to re-instate the petitioner into service with continuity of service and all consequential benefits and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.CHANDRAIAH SUNKARA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.CHIDAMBARAM(SC FOR AP GENCO) The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 1453 OF 2009 ORDER: 1. The petitioner was Additional Assistant Engineer under the Control of Divisional Engineer Shift ‘B’. He remained absented from attending the duties from 3-10-2004. Departmental proceedings have been initiated. The Primary Authority i.e. Chief General Manager (Administration) AP Genco Ltd., 3rd Respondent passed orders declaring that the petitioner deemed to have resigned from service. The petitioner preferred an appeal before the Chairman AP Genco Ltd., -2nd Respondent. The appeal ended in dismissal confirming the orders passed by the primary authority. Thereafter, he filed revision before the 1st Respondent. His revision is stated to be pending. Hence, he filed the writ petition assailing the action of the 1st Respondent in not considering the revision filed by him. 2. When the writ petition came up for admission, Sri K. Chidambaram, learned standing counsel of Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Ltd., takes notice on behalf of the Respondents 1 to 3. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 4. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that the revision filed by him before the 1st respondent is not being taken up. 5. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider the revision filed by him and pass appropriate orders within three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No order as to costs. ______________________________ Justice B. Seshasayana Reddy 2nd February, 2009. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 1453 OF 2009 2nd February, 2009.