THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR Crl.R.C.M.P. No. 2086 of 2009 and Criminal Revision Case No. 571 of 2005 Date: 11.09.2009 Between: Pandiripalli Govinda Raju. .. Petitioner/Accused And The State of A.P., through the Public Prosecutor, Hyderabad and another. .. Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR Crl.R.C.M.P. No. 2086 of 2009 and Criminal Revision Case No. 571 of 2005 Judgment: The Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner/accused Pandiripalli Govinda Raju, assailing the judgment dated 24-03-2005 in Criminal Appeal No.23 of 2003 passed by the learned II Additional Sessions judge (Fast Track Court), Parvatipuram, confirming the conviction and sentence imposed on him by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Parvatipuram, vide judgment dated 22-02-2003 in Sessions Case No. 157 of 2002 for the offence punishable under Section 417 IPC. 2. Now Crl.R.C.M.P. No.2086 of 2009 is filed by both the parties jointly, by way of lunch motion, stating that they have compromised the matter outside the Court and that the de facto complainant may be permitted to compound the offence and the accused may be acquitted of the offence under Section 417 IPC by setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed on him. 3. In the circumstances, the de facto complainant is permitted to compound the offence and accordingly Crl.R.C.M.P. No. 2086 of 2009 is allowed. 4. The petitioner/accused and the de facto complainant as well as their counsel are present. The parties have accepted the contents of memorandum of compromise and stated that they have voluntarily compromised the matter. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed acquitting the petitioner/accused, under Section 320(8) Cr.P.C., setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed on him by the Courts below for the offence punishable under Section 417 IPC. ______________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J. Date: 11.09.2009 Nsr