o^^^L- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT_BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. w •/>'/4-~72010 PETITLONERS RESPONDENTS .p/^\-^° /1 0: .-<y%; t£^S" ,^v \y/^^/ ^' ?./ : 1. Purno Ram Yadav, S/o Shri Budhuram Yadav, aged about 38 years, village- Khuntapani, Tahsil Pathalgaon, Distt. Jashpur(C.G.). 2. Tikeshwar Prasad Yadav, aged about 41 years, S/o Kuber Ram Yadav, r/ovillage Diwanpur, Tahsil Pathalgaon, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.). Versus :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Collector, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.). 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pathalgaon, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.). /4. Vijay Kumar Yadav, S/o Shri Vadaram Yadav, At/P.O.- Village Chiknipani, Block Pathalgaon, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.). PETITION UNDER_ARTICLE226_OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA —78 'S^ •^IIKn^, ©Tll'M'IS,fs|t11'M^< ..:.V:.£.-...^.)..^..:.6.s^/fc ^ sil^?! Tra?7 (yli'f'i'^) an^i q^ ft-ii'* 'tT^H -SH^T '»^iq» TOiiwsftasn^i SBj.HON'BLEMR. JU8TICBPRITI: 15.11.2010 Shri Ratan Pusty, counsel for Shri Ajit Singh, P.L. for the Sti Grievance of the petitioners i| petitioners remained out ofiobfrom, theirs and they have not been regul^ oorrect date. It has been mentionefl petitioners were assured by resp. N(] the authority concemed.It has bd resp. No.4 is junior to the petitione^ oetitioners. Counse! for the petitioners ^ already made a representation (An| would serve if direction is issued to| representation. State counsel has no objeotio| the petitioner is decided by the resjiondent N0.3 in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is directed to decide the pending repr^sentation of the petitioner within a period of four months from the d^ in accordance with law. !t is made clear that this Cotjrt has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the autho to decide the same strictly in accordjance with law. considering all the aspects of the case. •Sd/- -: pritinkerDiwakar Judge chl^l<?tiJ)T1 'W^ff "^f 'fe1E?t' •(f^f'^.K ^T SfRfIT 31I^?( SKER DIWAKER |the petitioners. ate. l the present petition is that the 08.4.01 tiil 19.4.05 for no fauit of -rized by the department from the i in the petition tbat though the i.3 but nothing has been done by en further pointed out that the •s but has been iplaced above the ubmits that the petitioners have -lexure P/9) and ends of justice the reso. N0.3 to decide the said n if the oending representation of disposed of. The reso. no.3 is te of receipt of copy of this order -ity concemed would be at liberty