IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13953 of 2007 Kamala Devi @ Kamla Devi, Wife of Yudhisthir Chandra Das, Resident of Barwa Colony, P.O. Pindari, P.S. Inarwa, District West Champaran. ----------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate, West Champaran, At Bettiah. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Narkatia Ganj, West Champaran. 4. The Child Development Project Officer, Maina Tard, West Champaran. 5. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Barwa, P.O. Pindari, P.S. Inarwa, Distt. West Champaran. 6. Smt. Sunita Devi, Wife of Deonath Baitha, Resident of Village Barwa, P.O. Pindari, P.S. Inarwa, Distt. West Champaran. ------ Respondents ----------- 2 18.12.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “1. That, by this writ application, the petitioner seeks to invoke the extra ordinary writ jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court for issuance of an appropriate writ/or writs, direction/ or directions, order/or orders, in the nature of mandamus for commanding the respondents to consider the candidature of petitioner in place of respondent no.6. On the post of “Angan Bari Sevika” under Gram Panchayat Raj Barwa, P.S. Pindari, P.S. Inarwa, District West Champaran, under which the name of Respondent no.6 has been selected by the 2 Respondent no.5 by violating the all norms and conditions of the selection process as directed by the State Govt. The petitioner further pray for any other reliefs for which she may entitled under law.” With reference to the aforementioned reliefs, counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner intends to move the Collector of the District by filing a compact representation. In the opinion of this court, recourse chosen by the petitioner seems to be correct inasmuch as the scheme for appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika itself envisages the redressal of grievance pertaining to selection/appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika in the first instance by the Collector of the District. That being so, this court would give liberty to the petitioner to file a compact representation which, if filed along with this order, will be disposed within the time limit fixed by the State Government in the Circular dated 10.12.2009 by a reasoned order after affording opportunity of hearing to the 3 petitioner, respondent no. 6 and the representative of concerned gram panchayat. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)