IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25358 of 2009 SUNIL PANDIT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 12.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Offence alleged is under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner’s application for bail was earlier rejected by this Court as per order dated 24.4.2009, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 6664 of 2009 vide annexure-1 to this application. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner is not a named accused. However, he has been made accused in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Gajendra Pandit who has been allowed bail by this Court as per order dated 22.5.2009 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 12649 of 2009 vide annexure-3. It is further submitted that save and except the confessional statement neither any recovery has been made from the petitioner nor he been put on T.I.P. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner Sunil Pandit be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri V. Kumar, J.M. , Supaul ,in connection with Triveniganj, P.S. case no. 44 of 2008 (G.R. No. 219/08). (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J) M.Rahman