1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.640 OF 1999. Indradas Daulat Pawar ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents. ... Mr.N.B.Suryawanshi, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.V.D.Rakh, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for the State. ... CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 06.08.2010. ORAL ORDER (Per S.V.Gangapurwala,J.) 1. The petitioner assails the judgment of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Aurangabad by virtue of which the Original 2 Application of the petitioner was dismissed. 2. The petitioner is claiming the deemed date of promotion. The petitioner claims that he should be given seniority from 18.6.1965 and deemed date of promotion to the post of Assistant Superintendent with effect from 8.9.1972. The petitioners claims that he was not sent for the training and the persons junior to the petitioner were sent for training in the year 1967. The petitioner passed the Departmental examination in the year 1969 without training and his seniority is fixed from January 1969. 3. Though the persons junior to the petitioner as claimed by the petitioner were sent for training in the year 1969. The petitioner at the relevant time did not raise any objection. He had preferred the original application also when he had retired. 4. The Tribunal has observed on the basis of the reply of the Respondents that there was no such exemption to the employees for training. 3 5. In light of the above, we do not find any error in the order impugned. As such the Writ Petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Rule discharged. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (B.R.GAVAI,J.) asp/office/wp64099