HtGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. 6834 of 2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 4 Rameshwar Prasad Danseng, s/o Sant Ram Dansena, aged about 46 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Chapte, Block Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G). Vsrsus State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretery, School EducaUon Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) The Director, PuUic Instruction Etepartment, Raipur (C.G) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal & Welfare department, Raigarh (C.G) Block Education Officer, Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G) WRTT PEnTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTn-UTION ^FjNBIA -< ^- Appearance: Shri Anil Mourya, counset for the petittoner. Ku. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer, for the State/ respondents on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (21.11.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submifs that the issue involved in the case is as to whether thepetitioner is entitled to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of initiat appointmentor from the date of completion of probation period. He submits that the issue invoh/ed herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrath/e Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 othere Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein, it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitted to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initiaf appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892^3. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'bte Supreme Court upholding the deeision of the Tribunat to the effect that the Teaehers/ Assistant Teachers are entitled to regutar pay scate from the date of initial appointment. W.P.(S)No. 6934 of 2007 Learned counsel for the peUtioner further submits that this Cpurt, while considering the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu & others Vs. State Govt.of Chhattisgarh & another (W.P.(S) No. 813 of 2007) by order dated 12.2.2007, has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. Learned counsel for the parties jolntly submit that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Ram Kumar Sahu and another (Supra). In view ofthat, this petition is allowed in the same terms. However, this order shall be subject to all verifications made by the State regarding facts pleaded in the petition. „ Sd/- ,. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Rao ^-