IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8739 of 2008 Radha Prasad, Son of Late Tapsi Prasad, Resident of Village – Kothai Barana, P.O. – Akorhi Gola, P.S.. – Dehri, District – Rohtas. …. …….. Petitioner Versus 1. The Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhavan Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The Financial Controller (I) Bihar State Electricity Board Vidyut Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. The General Manager cum Chief Engineer, Central Electric Supply Area, Patna. 4. The General Manager cum Chief Engineer Magadh Electric Supply Area, Gaya. 5. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Dehri, Rohtas. …… ……. Respondents ---------------------------------- 2 15.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ratan Prasad Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the respondents/ Bihar State Electricity Board. Learned counsel for the respondent/Board informs the court that during the pendency of the writ petition all the retiral dues of the petitioner have already been paid. The fact mentioned by learned counsel for the Board has not been disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner but it was submitted that the payment was made at belated stage. Sri Ratan Prasad Sinha, has further stated that most of the retiral dues were paid prior to filing of the writ petition and some of the amounts were paid after filing of the writ petition. In view of the fact that most of the retiral 2 dues were already paid to the petitioner before filing of the writ petition and remaining amount has also been paid subsequent to filing of the writ petition, the court is of the opinion that no order is required to be passed. The writ petition stands disposed of. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)