IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 10398 of 2008 Decided on: 21.12.2010 Pritam Singh …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : In view of the supplementary affidavit filed by respondent No. 1, Brij Lal Verma on 22. 8. 2005, the present petition does not survive. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 21, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?