IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.960 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: September 8, 2009. Dr. P.H. Krishnan ...Petitioner(s) v. Manu Nath ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri Vikas Bahl, Advocate, for the petitioner. ORDER Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The grievance of the petitioner in this case is that the respondent has committed a willful disobedience of the order dated 20.12.2008 passed by Lok Adalat, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar which was passed on the basis of an undertaking given by the respondent in the proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 whereby the respondent had undertaken to pay the balance amount of Rs.2.75 lacs by way of monthly installments of Rs.40,000/- each. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order dated 20.12.2008, disobedience of which is complained. In view of the compromise, the complaint filed by the petitioner was ordered to be adjourned sine-die to be taken up as and when the complainant makes a request upon default by the accused in the payment of two consecutive installments. Thus, in case of a default by the respondent, the petitioner has an effective remedy by reviving the complaint before the Mega Lok Adalat. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Dismissed. Rule discharged. September 8, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge