Page no. 1 M.Cr.C. no. 8393/2011 10/11/2011 Shri L.S. Chandiramani, Advocate for the applicants. Shri B. L. Yadav, Dy.G.A.for the respondent – State. Arguments on the first bail application under section 439 of Cr.P.C of the applicant Mukesh and Samar Vijay Singh heard. The applicant is involved in Crime no. 284/2011 of Police Station- Industrial Area, Ratlam registered under section34(2) of the M.P. Excise Act. According to the prosecution story, on 11/08/2011, at 21.50 pm, on the information of the informer, Jeep no. M.P.-05-SE-0747 was intercepted and the driver of the Jeep told his name as Mukesh and the other persons told their names as Samar Vijay singh and Shantilal. They were carrying the beer in the vehicle. They failed to show the permit about the transportation of the above Liquor, hence it was seized; the above offence was registered and the applicant has been arrested. It has been argued by the applicant's counsel that they produced the permit before the Trial Court at the time of the arguments onthe application, from which it reveals that Shantilal was the transporter of the above beer and it was being carried on the valid permit. It was being transported from village - Badavada to Village- Sukheda and permit was valid upto 11/08/2011, but the wine was seized at 21.50 pm. By mistake, the driver went on the wrong route, hence they have been arrested and the wine was seized. Trial will take time. Hence, they should be released on bail. Page no. 2 The respondent has opposed the bail application. Considering the circumstances and after perusal of the case diary, this bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the applicants be released on bail subject to their furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- each alongwith one surety by each applicant in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court for their appearance before the said Court on all dates as may be fixed in this behalf. C c as per rules ( I. S. Shrivastava, J. ) amol