^ SiHGLE BEHCH Vs RESPONDENTS 't;^.: ^<3Wf^. ~ 'K""& ^- •• IN HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS&ARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (s) N0. ^£9° OF 2009 PETITIONER : & r. VivekPatre, sonof Shri S.D. Patre, aged 38 years, Occupation-Service, -pesident of B-ll, Ravi Nagar, Behind Hotel Jyoti, Raipur (CG) 1.5tate of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, &epartment of Health & Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. 2. The Director, Medical Education, 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh, Raipur. 3. The Dean, Medical College, Raipur. 4. Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, through its Ghairman, Raipur. PETITION UNpeR ARTICLE 226 OF TRE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PRTICULARS OFPETITIONER:- As mentioned in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF RESPONDENTS:- -• As mentioned in the cause title. 3. PARTICULARS QF THE ORDER A6AINST WHICH y- N :i"l";l .i.li.iiti'.! 1! ^z^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATmLASPUR WRTT PETmON CS) No. 5690 of2Q09 PETmONER RESPONDENTS r. Vivek Patre. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTrUTIONOFWDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Aenlhotri, J. Present: Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Sbri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General forthe State/ respondents 1 to 3. ORDERCORAL) (Passed on 06th day ofOctober, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by not considering him for promotion to the post of Associate Professor despite the fact that he was at serial No. 1 in the select list published by tlie respondent No. 4. The petitioner has made a representation dated 14 September, 2009 (Annexure P/10) to the Secretary, Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Health & Family Welfare Department. According to Shri Shrivastava, the said representation is still not decided. 2. Shri Thakur, leamed Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State/respondents 1 and 3 submits that if the representation of the petitioner, as stated above, has not been decided, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance wifh law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period ofsix weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. ^*;- 3. . In view ofthe foregoing, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petifioner, nothing survives for adjudication at fhis stage. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of. Satis'<*t^wm ^ Jud6e !.amit