Civil Revision No.2583 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No.2583 of 2010 Date of Decision: 20.8.2010 Suraj Parkash …Petitioner Versus Gopal Sharma and Another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Ms. Kiran Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocate for the respondents. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 16.3.2010, passed by the Appellate Authority, Amritsar, whereby she remitted back the matter to the Rent Controller, Amritsar, to decide the same afresh. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. While passing the order dated 16.3.2010, the Appellate Authority, Amritsar, observed as under:- “...In view both the parties have conceded to the plea that the present case be remitted back to the learned lower Court for passing speaking order after discussing merits of rival claims between both the Civil Revision No.2583 of 2010 2 parties and to give specific findings regarding the ground of bonafide requirements taken by the applicants after appreciation of evidence and documents on record”. A perusal of the above said portion of the impugned order reveals that learned counsel for the parties had agreed that the matter be remitted back to the Rent Controller, Amritsar. In view of the consent order passed by the Appellate Authority, Amritsar, on16.3.2010, this Court cannot come to the rescue of the petitioner. Hence, the present revision petition is hereby dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge August 20, 2010 “DK”