IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.728 of 2009 RAM BINAY SINGH Versus FULO DEVI & ORS ----------- 3/ 21.05.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. The suit was fixed for taking steps for service upon the legal representatives of plaintiff no. 1 who had died. It was never pointed out by any of the orders as to what were the numbers of those plaintiff and by which the requisites were to be presented. In the above circumstances, the suit was dismissed for non compliance. Learned counsel for the petitioner has taken resort to Order IX Rules (2) and (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure which speaks of dismissal of suit. From the perusal of the aforesaid provision contained in Order IX Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it appears that the same is meant for a class of cases of the present nature. This Civil Revision petition is dismissed with a cost of Rs.500/- to be paid to the defendants. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)