^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF TUDICATUKE AT BITASPUR CHHATTISGARH CIVIL REVISION N0. c2 [ ° /2004 APPLICANT PLAINTIFF /^Sami Ulla Kiu-aishi/ S/o. Mohd. Siddhique Kuraishi, Aged about 31 years, R/o. Mayapur, Ambikapur, Distt Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS BESPONDENTS DEFENDANTS A » A Mohd. Jabbar Kuraishi S/o. Mohd. Siddhique, Aged 43 years, ,t^ ^•^^ ^L^^" Aged about 52 years/ ..-•".«•'a?'" R/o. Mayapiir, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) REVISION PETITION U/S. 115 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE n XI-HC-22 3^- Sll^llctff, ^{Itfilff, f^IRTy Sil^l •ra^ __^^i/0, *<TW(TgiiiraT-"--""""-'-""' g^- ,00 an^Tqir fN^SfI^T *w* •uRd Wlfa^TWRFffffe^ <RlWK ^sri^ITSIT^T ^^t-^ Shri Manoj Paranjpe, learned|counsel forthe applicant. Tlili TTils revision has been pr^ferrsd by the appllcant agamst the impugned order by which the app!i^ Kule 9 of C.P.C. has rejected It t'-?lti^B^ rtf th^ 1/Slll.Vj i yi tflsj th^ ^nrtii^^nt isrs^s," rli"^^>- '?R -i- i. '»w. i li. ^ii 3 :Sri °u-i ^uf i 'I^I.T i ^'-J' n/tha tria! fr,i,- li is 1 wvy s i. l.eamed couosel for the ^ppljcant submlts that he seeks to thls revision as the saff|e is not mainSainable in vlew of the proviso to 115 ofthe Cod^ of CMi Procedure wjth iiberty to fiie appropriate proceedings availabie uijider the iaw. In vjew of the above submi^sion, ths Instant revision is dlsmissed as not Learned counsel for the ap|}licant further prays for return of the 'mpugnsd order annexed with the retision "etition. Office is directed to return t^e certifiedcopy ofthe impugned order on appiioam fumishing an attested p|iotocopy ofthe same. Sd/- pturendraMtehra Judge (<ft^^f^) ^rf-/