‘@ INTHE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SEN§§£ $§§§€§§§ W.P. (S! No. d2§03 [2010 _ 2’ Ram Ashray Pradhan Sadhram Pradhan, 59 S/ o aged about Head Master Government Primary School PETITIONER. ‘RESPONDENTS: WR years, \xlw Sarhar Block Bamhmd1h D1stt l. State of Chhattisgarh Through: ~ Secfetary, Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) Block Bamhnidih Distt. Janjgir— Champa (C.G.) \ IT UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION R OF The District Education Officer, District Janjgir—Champa (C.G.} Block Education Officer, INDIA Irwu v II SIIuKIQ, i I CUUI’i3ci IGI’ True I pedin‘W‘iéI' $ on“ m- vnar‘uciresh m $‘m‘IvaStava, Panei Lawyer for the State. § wassea on 22¢“ June. 2mm u‘ _ With ihe COIISém of ihe pariies, me maiiei' is iauen up fer heai‘ing firraiiy‘ 1. W petitioner ee appoiiiteci as m Ref. 00,-. a. After comptetion of ’nis pi‘obatioit, he was granted I'egutar pay 3caie 2. Leamed courlsei appearieg for the petitioner eubmite that. the .es.e irrv‘otvee‘ in the case i3 e3 t0 whetheu, the petittoner te emitted to reguier pay Segue with effect from the date 0‘ ihitiai appointment or after con‘rptetion of probatien perfect. a a. 1-, Ine issue involvee I t herein was cc“ 'r'Iini ‘tr-ative Trihunai, Jaheipur in O.F\Ii\io.2745i8§ (iv‘iarihukant ‘I’ariu anti 56 ethere v. mate m t cf H MP. & others), wherein it was. heici that the S i reti 0y the i'vtadhya F'racieeh State 'y' Sim-nee t L r -_~-.~_-I_ e -e- _ ”a“ __. .A: .._g...,.. - ..__. I ‘ .. .‘I i- ‘ u _ .A .. it...“ ‘ u WE _._ r i_ 2 n .t. .:- appeintrnent. \ q-rhe rnauer u wae ta‘ en up to the i-ion‘hie S n" I‘I Spéciai Léave Peiin-.. nun “Av“; mam an Nu.6‘oa4‘i’§"o. nae a The Said péLiLiOt’I u waS ClsmiaSe‘G s ....... r i rj‘y‘ the i \ e w n i I gym—r Wm: ar—mwf‘ r': I i I Iuh ‘ la! .«m .u Haul r a. n.m.wuuh-n- r': I I I Iuwcn‘ . m mam .__ HSIIIa‘y' .-. LV Pi’adhaf‘I I ; vemus 'R'E3r'uwutw .any.=._..—-:.c-.«$ Ia hum—.— m—a-m-ma: m: vvml r=illlunl UN mate m,; OIzm.L unnathbgaun . .....L am: . 4 omels AL”- ma: uL: .— czn .ma. a vF mn— In: vul Imu-gnu =-:—:m- I Rana x“ n:- vr illl w [J y/fy non we Supreme Court u'piioiding the a‘ecisiorx 0f ihe Tribum? i” i§1e effeci iha‘t a. me _ Teamers/A$$isLai‘1t , . $ Teacherza are erntiiiea‘ to reguiai‘ pa. $caie fi'c‘m the dat‘ Of imimi appoh‘limem. q. 5 ‘Leai‘iied ccui‘nSei appearing f’i‘ ihe peiiiicr‘ler' further Submiis ‘rha‘i ihiS Court whrie carrsidei‘irig the $ame isSue in fimar Sai Ram & Omens v. Sfai‘e or“ unnaiiiSgafh “1.1. 62 atheis (\IVF.(5) No.4?25i’2306“) bv Gra'ei‘ Ciaied Giif§§f26f36 aiioweci the petiriorner‘ tr) make a r'epi'éseniatiori wiihir; a period 0f ten day‘g, raigirrg aii 'trueir grievarrcei 5. Accorciirlgiy', the petiiioner i$ gr‘aiiteti iibéi‘ry to make a re‘preeerrtriien raising aii his grievancee iru iigni of the aforee-aici judge—rem arrci the circuiar daied i3i01f200§ (Armexure PI2) arid ih turn, rhe eencerheci ree‘eoridehr ie ciirecteci t0 riecicie ihe repreeehtaiieh. ir‘ any, in accordance wiih iew, on its awn rneriis, Wiihin a period of 8 weeks irern the date ef receipt 0f the repreeeniaiien, eubjeci h Lu , Veiiiiuamm ‘ .T U! ifné z iaCLa. ‘ o. in View m .E L}Lne foregoing, i. Lnie 'pe is diepoeerj off. No or‘”er ass to ooeie. i n x / Sd/— Manindra Mohan Shrivastava , Judge