IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 6607 of 2009 Between: Syed Riyazuddin S/o. Syed Basheeruddin R/o. Flat No.101, Anas Residency, Upperpally Village, Rajender Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police Cyberabad Commissionerate Gachibowli, Hyderabad. 2 The Assistant Commissioner of Police Rajender Nagar R.R. District. 3 The Station House Officer Rajender Nagar Police Stat8ion Rajender Nagar, R.R. District. 4 Dr. Sk. Hafeez Ahmed W/o. Late Mohd. Saheb R/o. H.No. 2-4-72/A/112, Parmareddy Hills, Upperpally Village, Rajender Nagar, R.R. District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.3 herein in summoning the petitioner and his family members to the police station and threatening to refund the advance sale consideration to the 4th respondent pursuant to the Agreement of Sale dt. 24-11-2008, and thereby causing his interference in the civil disputes as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 4th respondent herein. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.PALLENAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ... ORDER: Questioning the action of the 3rd respondent – Station House Officer, Rajendernagar Police Station, Hyderabad in summoning the petitioner and his family members to the police station and threatening to refund the advance sale consideration to the 4th respondent herein pursuant to the agreement of sale dated 24.11.2008, the present writ petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. In response to the writ allegations, the 3rd respondent has filed a counter affidavit denying the allegations levelled against him that he is coercing the petitioner and his family members to refund the advance sale consideration, which they received from the 4th respondent and made them to execute a self voluntary declaration that they will pay the amount on or before 20.3.2009. It is also stated that he never deputed any police constable to the house of the petitioner and threatened his family members to settle the matter with the 4th respondent and that no complaint whatsoever is received or registered against the petitioner. The dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent is purely civil in nature and the respondent police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 4th respondent and to settle the personal scores only, the petitioner levelled baseless allegations against the police. In view of the above counter averments, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition and it is accordingly closed. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.27.4.2009 msv