IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 22ND MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 4926 of 2008(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ V.P.BAVA, R.V.MANZIL, MAIN ROAD PONNANI, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.AVM.SALAHUDIN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. 2. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY) TALUK OFFICE, PONNANI. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, PONNANI. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 4926 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: February 11, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that by Ext.P4 the appeal filed by the petitioner has been rejected by the Tribunal. It is stated that since there are several errors apparent on the face of Ext.P4, petitioner wants to seek review of the same. For that a week's time is necessary. It is stated that in the meantime revenue recovery proceedings have been initiated by Exts.P1and P2 and therefore this writ petition has been filed. 2. In view of the fact that as at present Exts.P1 and P2 are enforceable, I do not think that the respondents can be faulted for the coercive action that they have initiated. 3. However, having regard to the fact that the petitioner wants to seek review of Ext.P4 and taking into account the pendency of Ext.P1 and P2 revenue recovery proceedings, I direct that the WP(c) 4926/08 2 implementation of Exts.P4 shall be deferred for a period of one week and in the meantime the petitioner can seek appropriate remedy. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-