HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR S.B.: HON'BLESHRIJUSTICESUNILKUMARSINHA WRIT PETiTION (S) N0. 5442S010 PETLTIONER RESPONDENTS 1. 2. Keshav Ram Dewangan.son of Late Mandhar Dewangan, aged about 48 years, working as Clerk at Head OfRce, District Cooperative Agricuttural and Rural Development Bank, Gayatri Nagar, Dharampura Road, Jagdaipur, C.G. VERSUS Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Chhattisgarh, Ra!pur(C.G.) Chief Exeeutive Officer, District Co- operatiye Agricultural and Rural Development Bank, Jagdaipur, C.(G. PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF !ND|A Appearance: Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. ORALORDER (22.09.2010) SUNiL KUMAR SINHAJ. Heard on admission. Petitioner- Keshav Ram Dewangan is working on the post of Clsrk in District Cooperativa Agricultural and Rural Development Bank. By the impugned order dated 15.09.2010,he has beentransferred from Head OfRce.Jagdalpur toBranch,Dantewada. Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that earlier also on 12.07.2010, thepetitioner was transferred from Branch OfRce, Jagdalpur to Head OfRce, Jagdaipur and just after 2 months now, he has been transferFed from Head Office, Jagdalpur to Braneh, Dantewada, which is a frequentdisplaGement ofthe petitioner. I By the earlier order dated 12.07.2010, thepetitjonerw^ transferred from :a Braneh office, Jagdalpur to Head office; Jagdatjin.irl wl'flBhwaS a local shifting in theta^nship ofUagdalpuritself. | II I! Onbeingpoiritecllyaskeclfromleamedcounselforthepetiti^ri^r Waysinee 'wt'ien, the petitiQi-ier is';|3os;te8 at Jagdalpur, he submitSWatjthie petitiQn6r^ispc>stedatJagdalpHFSincie^last|S-'7years. ! ? 1 i It has not been ?disputed;tMat th& petitiongr is workingf eii; transferable post. WRITPETITION(S) N0.5442/2010 "- Transfer is an incidence of service. No person working on a transferable postcan make his claim for posting ata particular place. It is for the employer to see as to who should be posted at which piace, keeping in mind the better functioning ofthe department as also the public interest. Unless the order of transfer is shown to be vitiated by malafides or extraneous considerations or it isshown to be passed against any statutory Rule or the Act, normally such orders are not to be interfered by a Court of law, is the settled view ofthe Apex Court in many cases. !n view of the above, the transfer of the petitioner from Head Office, Jagdalpurto Branch office, Dantewada cannot be interfered byway ofthiswritpetition. The petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge