IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: May 24, 2011 Crl. Revision No.1344 of 2003 Shakuntla …Petitioner Versus Saneev and another …Respondents Present: Mr. S.K.Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. H.S.Brar, Amicus Curaie, for respondent No.1. Mr. Saurav Mohunta, DAG, Haryana, for respondent No.2-State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? HEMANT GUPTA, J. For order see Criminal Appeal No.827-DB of 2002 titled “Sanjeev Vs. The State of Haryana”. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 24.05.2011 (A.N.JINDAL) Vimal JUDGE