IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32826 of 2011 Wakil Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar For the petitioner:-Mr. Prabhakar Singh, Advocate. For the State:-Mr. Bihari Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 2. 14.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 257/2011 for the offence under Sections 366 and 366 (A) of the I.P.C. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case by the informant Bigan Mahto father of the Manti Devi regarding her kidnapping. In fact Manti Devi fell in love with the petitioner and performed the marriage it would appear to Annexure 2 to this application the statement of victim Manti Devi recroded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in which she has stated all the story and stated that she wants to reside with her inlaws and husband not with her parents. Under the facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 257/2011. Kamlesh (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)