bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1892 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 1892 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 1892 OF 2008 Jeevan Pralhad Phunde ... Petitioner v/s The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.K.S.Patil for the petitioner. Ms.A.T.Zaveri, A.P.P. for the respondent State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.V. POTDAR, J. A.V. POTDAR, J. A.V. POTDAR, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 13TH FEBRUARY, 2009 13TH FEBRUARY, 2009 13TH FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. Heard advocate for the petitioner followed by the learned A.P.P. 2. By the present petition there is a challenge to the additional charge framed by the Third Ad-hoc District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in S.C.C. No.582 of 2006 dated 22.1.2008. Read the order passed below Exh.7 in the said sessions case, also read the complaint lodged by the complainant and the contentes therein in this regard. 3. Considering the averments made in the complaint and the order passed below Exh.7, in para 3, there is a 2 clear averment that the pill was given to the complainant which resulted in her abortion. I do not find any fault in the order passed by the learned Third Ad-hoc District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Pune. No merits in the petition. 4. Writ petition rejected and stands disposed of.