1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 44 OF 1993 Ramdas Narayan Thakur & Ors. ... Petitioners vs. Tahsildar, Uran & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. T.K.Pail for the petitioners – Absent. Mr. S.R.Narglkar, AGP, for responodents Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. D.A.Dube, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 10th December, 2009. P.C. 1. This petition is similar to what was in issue in Writ Petition No.4942 of 1992 which was disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court on 22.6.2002. The statement made on behalf of the State Government was that Government had decided not to coercively recover levy on rice from any of the rest of owners for the period between 1992-93 and 2001-2002. This statement was accepted and in view of that the petition was disposed of. 2 2. In our opinion, in the instant case also in view o the statement made in the earlier petition, the respondents are not entitled to make recovery accordingly. Nothing further survives in the petition. Rule is discharged. No other as to costs. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)