\^ i.S7; Ciaimants Sukhram, son of Chotu about 50 years Pacho Bai, wife of aaed about 48 vears Paikra, aged Paikra Soth residents of villafle Gutpura, Police Station Kasdole, District Raipur, f^/^^^gr-^^N)^^ hri ^ 'ti EC^L^E'^^GE ^ i ifc.^5'^i>»p lYSsponciao^s Dwarika Prasad, son of Roopsingh NirmaSkar, agsd about 35 years, residents of village Piparchedi, Police Station kasdole, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh Rajkumar, son of late Panchooram Netam, residence of Devri, Poiice ion Baloda Bazar, District Raipu fUIC UWf The New India Assurance Company dvil 1 in&^ R?sloria R???far v*^5V:i i—tl^i^rf^?, ^jC^s^^^i L^C^^i^i IVti: ct€^H il under Sed :73of Act Cli—,; ppellants. None forthe Shri Deepak GiiTa, counsel for respondent No.3. rth 1i E y'':^.^ "f •/ ^r ^ '% i Sasass. I I 1 I^fi /,•' Jj' ?%-1: subbu 2 The foilowing order of the Court was pass< None for the appellants. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appeilants, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- X^hief Justice Sd/.. R.N. Chanoi: juage 'V E:^