IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18128 of 2009 NAGENDRA YADAV S/O RAMDEO RAI, R/O VILL-JITWARPUR, P.S- SAMASTIPUR (M) DISTRICTT- SAMASTIPUR THE CHAIRMAN OF VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PARTY HAVING ITS OFFICE JITWARPUR, NIZAMAT, WARD NO.3, DISTRTICT- SAMASTIPUR. -PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR PANCHAYATI RAJ, GOVT. OF BIHAR 3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR PANCHAYAT RAJ DARBHANGA DIVISION- DARBHANGA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SAMASTIPUR 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFIER CUM CIRCLE OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR 6. THE INCHARGE INSPECTOR BLOCK SAMASTIPUR, DISTRICT- SASMASTIPUR 7. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYT, JITWARPUR BLOCK-SAMASTIPUR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR 8. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT JITWARPUR, BLOCK SAMASTIPUR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR -RESPONDENTS 2 22.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition in purported public interest, making an allegation that the Mukhiya and Panchayat Secretary of Gram Panchayat Jitwarpur, Block and District Samastipur, have indulged in bungling and defalcation of money in the name of Indira Awas Yojna. It is not possible for this court to monitor such 2 individual complaints requiring investigation of facts. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation / complaint before respondent no.4, the District Magistrate, Samastipur and the respondent no.5, the Block Development Officer-cum-Circle Officer, Samastipur. If such representation is filed then the respondents no.4 and 5 shall ensure that the complaint is enquired into and action is taken in accordance with law. (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ.) (Jyoti Saran, J.) AAhmad