-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 676 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 676 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 676 OF 2006 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 178 OF 2004 SECOND APPEAL NO. 178 OF 2004 SECOND APPEAL NO. 178 OF 2004 1. Laxman Bapu Ingawale & Anr. .. Petitioners. V/s. 1. Ramchandra Bapu Ingawale & Ors. .. Respondents. --- Mr.Girish Paryani i/by N.R.Bubna for the Petitioners. --- CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATED : 19th OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 19th OCTOBER, 2007. DATED : 19th OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. :- . The office nothing shows that except Respondent No.2(c), the other proposed legal representatives of the deceased-Respondent No.2 have been duly served with the notice. The application stands dismissed as against the Respondent No.2(c) by virtue of an order dated 15th November, 2006. There is no contest by the Respondents No.2 (a) and 2(b). 2. Hence, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) with a modification that only the names of Respondents No. 2(a) and 2(b) are permitted to be brought on record. Amendment to be carried out within six weeks from today. -: 2 :- (A.S. OKA,J.)