IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.1528 of 2009 Between: Brandix India Apparel City Private Ltd. rep. by its Director Mr. Vinu Sudan, A.P.S.E.Z, Pudimadaka Road, Atchutapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam. 2 The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam. 3 The Sub Inspector of Police, Atchutapuram Police Station, Atchutapuram, , Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not responding to the reports given by the petitioner company and not protecting the men and machinery including construction of marine outfall from the petitioner company (Park) to the sea adjacent to Pudimadaka Village as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct respondents to protect the men and machinery of the petitioner company including the construction of the marine outfall from the petitioner company (Park) to the sea adjacent to Pudimadaka Village as and when required by the petitioner company and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.N.RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.1528 of 2009 ORDER: It is the only grievance of the petitioner that, in spite of its representations, the respondent police are not providing protection to its men and machinery and to its construction activities. Though the petitioner contends that the respondent police are not responding to its representations, no material has been placed before this Court to show that the petitioner has given any complaint or representation to the respondent police, in writing, seeking to provide protection. In such circumstances, the petitioner is directed to submit a representation to the 3rd respondent- Sub Inspector of Police, Atchutapuram Police Station, Visakhapatnam, for providing protection, and, on such representation being submitted, the 3rd respondent shall consider the same and take necessary action. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 9th February, 2009 IBL