IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12130 of 2011 Noor Alam Versus Md.Habib Mian & Ors ----------- 02. 29.07.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the plaintiff- petitioner against the part of the order dated 03.05.2011 as contained in Annexure-11 passed by Subordinate Judge III, West Champaran, Bettiah in Partition Suit No.204 of 2000 whereby the learned Court below refused to exhibit the reply of the defendant-respondent dated 27.01.2011 as exhibit in the case. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in this reply dated 27.01.2011, the defendants have admitted certain facts relevant for the purpose of decision in the partition suit and, therefore, the petitioner prayed before the Court below for exhibiting the said reply as exhibit. It is admitted fact that in the same suit, this reply dated 27.01.2011 has been filed by the respondent against the application filed by the petitioner dated 11.01.2011. In such view of the matter, it appears that this reply is a part of the record and, therefore, it can be shown to the Court at the time 2 of hearing also. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, in my opinion, it is not a fit case for exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)