Civil Revision No. 1922 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1922 of 2010 Date of decision : 22.3.2010 Bandeep Rekhi ....Petitioner Versus M/s Juneja Trading Agencies ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Divanshu Jain, Advocate for the petitioner S. D. ANAND, J. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, states that the petitioner would be content and interests of justice would be served if a time bound disposal of the petition under reference is ordered by this Court. It is apparent from the pleadings, wherein interim orders have been quoted, that the relevant ejectment petition on a plea of personal necessity came to be filed in the year 2007. It is further apparent from a perusal of the interim orders that various Presiding Officers who came to handle it appear to have granted adjournments a plenty 'on request'. The interim orders further do not, at all, notice the nature of request nor is there an indication about whether the grant thereof had been contested by the party opposite or not. It is further apparent therefrom that one particular application came to be filed on 7.12.2007. Nature of that application was not indicated in the relevant order. Reply thereof came to be filed on 19.5.2008 and there is no indication in the interim orders whether it has been Civil Revision No. 1922 of 2010 -2- disposed of till date or not. In support of the plea, learned counsel relies upon the judgment dated 19.1.2010 rendered by this Court in Civil Revision No.302 of 2010 (Sandeep Ghai Vs. Neeraj Malhotra). The petition is disposed of in limine with a direction that the learned Rent Controller shall dispose of the main petition itself within three months from the next date of hearing. The disposal of this petition in limine, with a view to expedite the disposal of the proceedings, proceeds on an assumption that there is no factual inaccuracy in the averment on behalf of the petitioner. If it transpires, at any subsequent point of time that this order had been obtained on the basis of any incorrect averment, it (order of this Court) would be liable to be reviewed. The acknowledgment (of a copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned Sessions Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by afore-mentioned date. Disposed of accordingly. March 22, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE