IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6112 of 2009 SAHDEO MAHTO S/O LATE DHANESHWAR MAHTO, R/O VILLAGE- RAMPUR DALIAGHAT, P.S.- SADAR (MUFFASIL), DISTRICT- PURNEA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29/04/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under sections 409, 420, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Initially a complaint was filed which was referred to police under section 156 (3) of the Cr.P.C. where the present FIR has been registered. The petitioner is named accused of the case. He is the headmaster of the Primary School whereas the informant is the secretary of that school. Allegation is that the petitioner has withdrawn some amount but he has not properly utilized it. Submission is that the paragraph 16 and 17 of the case diary reveals the correct fact. The petitioner has earlier lodged a case and on account of that the present case has been lodged. I. O. has recorded the statement of the Bank Manager who has stated that the amount was withdrawn by two cheques but the petitioner’s signature did not tally with the original one. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Sahdeo Mahto is directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri N. Kumar J. M. Ist Class/concerned court, Purnia in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 290 of 2008. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)