: 1 : FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.99 OF 2008 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO.9040 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s . orders or directions and . Registrar’s orders . -------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.S.R. Page for the Applicant. Mr.G.S. Godbole i/b Mr.P.M. Arjunwadkar for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 19TH JUNE, 2008. P.C. : 1. There is a delay of 140 days in filing this Civil Revision Application. Further two statements in support of the application are indeed incorrect. Firstly though the Petitioner was not present when the impugned order was pronounced, its advocates were present. Secondly, there was no extension of stay granted by the impugned order. : 2 : 2. However,it is difficult to state that the statements were made deliberately with a view to mislead this Court. They appear to have been made due to the communication gap or some misunderstanding between the Petitioner and its advocates. 3. In the circumstances, I am inclined to condone the delay. However, the Respondents ought to be compensated for this application as they are not concerned with the reasons for the delay. 4. In the circumstances, the delay is condoned and the Civil Revision Application shall be considered on merits. The Petitioner shall pay the costs of this application fixed at Rs.1500/- on or before 3.7.2008.