S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Restoration Application No.132/2009 IN S.B. Civil Revision Petition No.500 of 1996. Mahaveer Prasad Vs. Kishan Lal & Others Date of Order :::: 07/08/2009 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. H.S. Khandelwal, Counsel for the Petitioner None present for the respondents, despite service. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. None present for the respondent, despite service. Heard on the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. There has been a delay in filing the restoration application and an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed for condonation of delay. Having perused the application, I am satisfied that there was sufficient cause, which prevented the petitioner from filing the application for restoration of the revision petition within the prescribed period of limitation, as the petitioner did not have the knowledge about the passing of the order. The application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is allowed. The delay is condoned. Heard on the restoration application. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to restore S.B. Civil Revision Petition No.500/1996 to its original number, as I find sufficient cause for the non-appearance of the petitioner and his counsel when the case was called for hearing. The restoration application stands allowed. Office to proceed. (Dalip Singh) J. ashok/