WP(C) 2134/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. A.S. Choudhury, learned senior counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Roy, learned Govt. Advocate who represents the respondents No. 1 and 2. The petitioner was settled with Paglahat and Daily Bazar by the Dhubri Zila Pari shad upto 30.6.09. He has filed the instant petition to seek direction for consi deration of his prayer for extension and remission as it is claimed that land co uld not operate the Hat in an efficient manner because of reasons beyond his con trol. It is seen that sale notice has already been issued on 2.5.09 by the Dhubr i Zila Parishad (Annexure-6), whereby all the Bazars including the Paglahat and Daily Bazar is put to sale. Under such circumstances, the prayer of the petitioner regarding extension of th e terms is not considered to be justified by the Court. However, on the claim for remission, the petitioner may file an appropriate appl ication before the Govt. under Rule 49 of the Assam Panchayat (Financial) Rules, 2002 within a week from today and if such a representation is filed, the Govt. is directed to consider the same on merit and pass appropriate orders expeditiou sly and preferably within 4 weeks after receipt of the representation. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.