^ r^ V"^ IN THE HIGH GOURTOFJUDICATURE AT BIIASPUR^C.G.) MiscellaneousAppealNo. //3J- 72003 gjyislQn B® APPELLANT5: CUUMANT5 ...^' ^^ ^ss^ .-^^ ^^^" ^y? <^/ y R NDEmB <ON-APPLICAMTS -^•' -3) ^r 2) 3) teraga Bai, W/o. Bsesar Satnami aged about 45 yis. Ku. Bina, D/o. BisesarSabiami aged about 17 yrs. Ku. Pushpa, D/o. LatE BisesarSatnami aged about 15 yis. Appdlant no.2 & 3 areRepresentsd by Mother teraga Ba 4> Prabha Bai Pushpa, D/o. Ids Hsesar Satnann aged about 30 yrs. Basant kumar,S/o. £atBBisesar Satnami ag»labout 28 yrs. 'rY Pranesh kumar, S/o. Late BlsesarSatnarra ..aged about 26 yns. PraUina Bai,S/o. Late BisesarSatnami aged about 24 yis. '"Manohar Lal, S/o. Late Bis^ar Satnami agedabout 22 yrs. All R/o, ViB-.Ldpur, P.0. Mandhar, Dist:Raipur (CG) VHtSUS Manikdas, S/o.Ramchandra Das R/o. Vill: & P.0. Kesrangi, P.S. Kharora Dist:Raipur (CG) Ramchandra Das, S/o. l^endia Das R/o. Vill: & P.0. K^rangi, PS. Khaiora Dfet:Raipur (CG) The Oriental Insurance Insurance Co, Ltd., Ttirough Divistonat Manager, Divisional Office, Pasndari Road, Raipur(CG) ^" Miscellaneous Appeal under section 173 OF Motor Vtehfctes Act 19fl® -^••—•l rl?" A)l! XI HC—78 SS'WI^W 3TT^?T fh^W' Gowri WHW ^iWcfi ^ST •^fl'41<vltf, ^Tll^'lfi, fa«'1l'M^< . /V\.^.|^0. ^^,'\\V> Tra;-"'"''"''"'""' " """""'••^200 SIT^T'q^qi' (1°lf-lsl<y) TCTOT^fCT3i^I Division Bench : Hon.Shri Fakhruddin, J. 8s Hon.Shri L.C. Bhadoo, J. 01-11-2004 / AppeUant/ s by Shri ^ L-- \^fTf^, Ae^J- The case is listed for ordei-s on defaults. Leamed coiuisel for fhe appeUaitt/s pi-ays for tuae to reinove the defaults. As prayed, two weeks tune is graiited to nemove tlie defaults. If fhe ,' defaiilts aiie not reiaoved wifhin the stipulated tune the appeal shaU. be disnussed automaticaUv without further rcference to fhe Bencb. !uage L- - Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge +1^^-^'1 "RW^f ^f fe^t <f^^i< ^? 3ftfiTO3I^[ X* Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge ffowat Btm..—.^-A-s.diwiiEa.id-ifBsfc.awiwdu-aEa^.—-. o M , \\ •11!' ' I iSliil /' m^ i- xy-OR '/^7^ 4SI/Q3, •^ M.A. No. 431/20)3 was Usted befwe tfie Hon'bk courton 1.11.2004 and cm feat date Hon'ble court ordered <hat two weeks' time is mantd to remove fte defauft. ff the definilt ig not remowd wiflrin fte rtipulated tnn& ttie appeal shalt be disaussed automatically without ftriher rrferenee to the Bench. Ih compMance oflhe above order dated 1.11.2004 Ifae appeBaat was required to file fresh vakalatuama duly signed by flie qipellante witlun two weeks' Smm. Ae date oforder. As per note of filing clet't; dated 20.11.M04 and note rfD.A..dated 20.11.2004 it shows fhat neiflier. coimsd for the a^ellait has filed fresh vakalatnama nor ffled any aiqiMcation in tliis regard wifhin Ae stipulated period. Uadsr diese circumstatces, in the lidit of peremptay orte dated 1.11.2004 offfie Hon'ble Court die ap(»alstood dismissed. Counsel be infonned accordinely. • —— »» Sd/- AR(J) AK^) Section DfneertGiviI') J->-b. <^-, ~^^>-~ £"-->