1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5091 OF 2009 Suryakant Murlidhar Kamble .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Mr N.B.Suryawanshi, Advocate for petitioner Mr D.R.Kale, A.G.P. for respondents 1 to 3 Mr C.K.Shinde, Advocate for respondent No.6 Respondents 4 and 5 served CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 6th April 2011 PER COURT After hearing this petition for some time, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition and to approach the Education Officer for redressal of his grievance. According to the petitioner his services ought to be approved as he is the only candidate from the reserved class working in Class IV with the respondent No.5 – school. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. All contentions in the petition are kept open. The learned Assistant Government Pleader states that the Education Officer will decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of four weeks of its receipt after hearing the petitioner as well as the management. ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) ( SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. ) (vvr/5091.2009wp) 2