IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-3181 of 2011 Date of decision: February 15, 2011. State of Haryana ...Petitioner v. Satpal s/o Dharambir ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Ms. Shalini Attri, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the petitioner-State. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia , J. (Oral): Present petition has been filed under Section 439 (2) Cr.P.C. by the State of Haryana seeking cancellation of pre-arrest bail granted to Satpal, accused-respondent. Accused-respondent was granted pre-arrest bail by Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad vide impugned order dated 15.9.2010. While granting pre-arrest bail, the Court below had taken into consideration the fact that the role attributed to the petitioner is that he had visited along with the main accused Kailash Bainsla in the office of the complainant. No overt role has been attributed to him. On the last date of hearing, an adjournment was granted to the State Counsel to ascertain the stage of investigation. Ms. Shalini Attri, learned Dy. Advocate General, Haryana, on instructions from SI Ram Krishan, has submitted that investigation has been concluded qua the 3 co- accused and report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has been submitted. Since the respondent has not been assigned any overt role, no ground is made out to interfere and set aside the order granting pre-arrest bail to him. Furthermore, he has also not misused the concession of bail. Hence, there is no merit in the present petition which is accordingly dismissed. Crl. Misc.No.M-3181 of 2011 -2- However, a liberty is granted to the State to approach the concerned Court of Additional Sessions Judge, who has granted the pre- arrest bail to the respondent for its cancellation in case he misuses the same. [Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] February 15, 2011. Judge kadyan