1 W.P.No.166/11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.166 OF 2011. Syed Murtuja @ Rahebar S/o Sayed Jilani ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents. ... Mr.Patel Shaikh Ashpak Taher, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.N.R.Shaikh, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the State. ... CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 12.01.2011. PER COURT 1. Heard. 2 W.P.No.166/11 2. The petitioner states that he had earlier participated in tender process for shoeland at Dargah Hazrat Syed Shah Turabullhaq Urs yatra 2010, Parbhani. The grievance is that though by communication dated 7.1.2010, the Collector, Parbhani, forwarded proposal of the petitioner to various authorities for their comments, no decision has been taken so far. 3. The petitioner has not participated in the fresh advertisement which was dated 11.1.2010. The submission of the learned counsel is that the petitioner's earlier proposal being pending, the same be directed to be decided, so that the petitioner would function at the said place in accordance with the advertisement issued in the year 2010. 4. In the facts of the case, the petitioner has already participated in the advertisement and the decision would be taken by the responsible authorities accordingly. 5. No interference in exercise of extra 3 W.P.No.166/11 ordinary writ jurisdiction of the Constitution of India, is warranted. The Writ Petition is rejected. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (NARESH H.PATIL,J.) asp/office/wp166.11