IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 211 OF 2009 SHRI SAMEER CHARI ... Petitioner Versus MARGAO MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. H.D. Naik, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. D. Padiyar, Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 17th April, 2009 P.C. Heard. 2. The offer made by petitioner could not materialize into contract because of failure of petitioner to furnish Bank Guarantee as required by the terms and conditions. The petitioner initially stated that because of financial year end, his Bankers expressed inability to provide Bank Guarantee. In support of this, Petitioner gave the letter of the Bank to the Municipal Council which did not mention any such reason and stated that his proposal was under consideration. The Bankers having not issued a Bank Guarantee, the proposal of the petitioner was not complete and contract could not be executed. 3. In view of this position, Municipal Council has withdrawn the acceptance of offer made by petitioner vide its communication dated 31.03.2009. The terms and conditions of the auction are very clear and the fact that the petitioner could not fulfill the same within stipulated time is also established. In the circumstances, we do not wish to interfere with the same in writ jurisdiction. Hence the Petition is dismissed. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. arp/*