^I^I^'F^I^T'^<^j^^^''l^^^^^^^>^^' BEfii|E_TMBHiN'EtffiftiB^i^^l^i@iJBiiNffilSi|^Rin| JgUliRi.IR 1 -'--:':';;~.: -':• .'• •^.': ••:-" .'[.. . ...;;. ,. -'• :,: .-.'•...-• W.R. Nl N&. fc 2- /^008 D .•U PETmONER ::..•••" F.R.KHanS/oLateShriMdul^ ; /^ed about"59 years,' ^ pr-eseW^ ^^^.^'^^^^ ^.worl<ing,'''ias:'^'FOre ^..&^'^ :';j':' :;;^^^ ^^s^^^'" : Sar^tury^: R^F^ ^ P0|& PS RannkQla, DiStriGt-Sarguja:(CG). ^E&suss:;'..^:^...'. /li^.', :r;' '^^::~;:.'<'.^v\ \^ ^^y. s%%" ^'s^''- ^ysp::/^: RESPON0ENTS T^.:,, •St^:^pf^fhhaU)sg^rh'''|li Tt|Foughj ^ ^^'.Se<^|i^^^re^^e|atti^ent,,^^^ Bh^wain,^R|ipur,;:(C.G.^,:l;|'i^. ^-7)i. ^'The.^,.!S^ial:;;,,SeGEeta^,,l,tSta^ Chfialtisgarti, foEesf^DeRaF(ment, Dt® Bnawan^^ipin':<e.Cj.)'.::''^;:iS'.:';::^^1?^ 3)^; State pf Atedhya Pradesti - TOrou^ ^ ^^Secretary,f^restDeRartmenfi'Va®a^h Bhawan Bhawan, Bhopat (MR). Untler Seeretary, State of Aft. P. F@Fest Departrrignt, Wallabh Bhawan Bhawan, "Bt1i9pal (MP).-;/ '-''::';';'';r;.:T'- :;:::::^^;''.:: PrifiGipal', Ghief.'Conservat6r[W ^(Ac)mn!),;!^anya Bh|W^ni?3 Uail^Roacl, .^Rai]pun(CGtK.:,;':'::,..i^-'rJ^r ?^ 6)t/^ Consen^or ,8f Forest, Sarguja^^^^^K '^;^ ^,' AnibJkapyr,;;[BstFieto5argu|a.?(6G)^,/ ^:^ WRlTPETlTIQN^NiaE^^BUllSMS^IIET'He •l;;''l;':^.-€(3NS^ja9iBiBl®R»iffii%!^ ^^ ^fr; HI(3HC<aURTKQF@MNAtT'IS©^ftATlgl'l.»IIN •':.':'.;VWRl1':.RETlTim^?Ncj.':^;<3E2QQ8^'''^^ RETITIQNER RESFONDENTS 'F.R.;'Khan:i..,,,:.:'•:.•:;' •'-.VEf^US- • ::'"L ^;): •' StateiOfGhhattisgarh&Qthers WRIT"RETItlON^N@il»R¥l(:^@226;@lRtNECQNSTIT'Um©N^^^^ ; SBsHon'tilelShriSatisn^K.jSdniftcrt^^ Rresertts ?ShriAs sttSurana,^ ,StTriBhjashankTfeakur,Pan^lLawyerf6rtReState. ShriAnandDadanya,7\dyQc^teforthelntervenor. •i;iQ^@iE^if©I^U::.^':-:::.:i.;'':::.'1''^^^'^ (Passedbn1gtnSa^of!^ 1; Challenge in this petition, is to the order^^^^^^^ (Anrtexure P-2), wtiereby the petitioner has been allpeateil^^^ . %Stat&^ MSflB^^gMNK^^^^ •,lnteFvgner;:li^|n^|^'t|g^||!l^ti^jtc^l^e.^©tate::of^ on mutyal basis,iE>rderdated1.t1^07j(^n th6fletitipnerwasdireGtedtabe^relieved^fr6msfervice IVIaclhya Pradesh pursyahttotheorder^d orderdatedS,12.2007(Annexyre,P-4),wherebytheConsgl-vatQrpf Eorest, Surguja Circle, AmbikapHr(C.G.)w©sdj[^te^^ petitionertojpin in StateiifMad^^ 2. ^Learhed counsei aRp6anng;ifoKii1;^ ^ petitioheTBad notmaciej;a(n%iEt|^l^tiGri3fo^ to State of MadhyaBR(i61^ w^ mutual exehange b.asis.^Tlie^Retitjone^ 17.7.2QQ7 (ABnexur&P^deByingrftisTOUtU9l,GC)nsent1^ ^ . crf hisservicesto the StatebfMadhya Pradesh, beforetheiri-ipugned . altocationorderdated 18.10.2007 waSpassed. 3. That, the petitioner has not agreecl for mutual allOGation of his services to Statedf Macthya Pradesh with Sunil Ghandra Shrivastava, thereafter, the petitioner had agaffr-written, to the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Government of Ghhattsigarhj Raipur (Annexure P-6) on 12.11.2007 to cancel the order dated 18,10.2007, whteh has been passed ignoring the letter of ffie petitiorierdated 17.7.20Q7, thereunderthe petitioner had notagreed for his allocation tothe State of Madhya Pradesh, on mutual basis. Thus, theimpugned orders maybeqyashed. 4. ThisCourt,byorderdated 8.1.2008, directed not to relieve the petitionerRursuanttooFcterdated 8.10,2007 (Annexure P-2) and 11.113007 (Annexui-e P-3) and 5.12.2007. A^ petitioner continyed in servic®in petitioher, thereafter, retired on attaihing the age ofsuperannuafion on 31.8.2008, inthe StateofChhattisgarh. 5. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits thaf since th6 petitioner has retired on attaining fhe age of superannyation in the StateofChhattisgarh.themutyalallocationorderpassedwithQutthe consentofthepetitioner,maynotbe^giveneffectto. 6. Stiri Thakur, learned counSel appeanng for the respondent State submits that on aecount of the subsequent development, as the petitioner tiad already retired from!sen/ice, the mutual allocEltion orderdated18.10;2Q07cQyldnotbegiveneffecttoahdhasbecome ^-^-^'^^Sfc^^ ••^SSS'SfSS^^'S^ss'^K^^sK'^::^''' Ashok m infructuous.The State of Chhattisgarh has no ob)eetion to grant admissible legal retrial benefits tO the petitioner. 7. SHri Sunil Chandra Shrivastava Has filed an application fbr intervention (I.A.NC).2) Qn'tlne ground that ifthepetitioner eould not . be allQcated to the State of Madhya^PradeshiKthe-lntervejner could als& not be allocated to thgi State bf Ghhattisgarh as this was a mutual alloeation. Qnce, th^ mufual allocation by not alloeating one: emplciyee from the State of Chhattisgarh to theState of Maclftyg Pradeslr is not given effect to, automatiGally Sunil Chandra Stiriyastava, who happens to be ^n employee of Stateof Madhya Pradesh, continuestobeanemploYeeofMadhyaPradesh. 8. Having regard to the faets situation, as aforestated without ctistuFbing the position ofallOGatkinofSunilChandFaShrivastavaintheStatebf Madltya Pradesh, the order dgted 18.10.2007 has become ineffectjve on aceoynt Qf^oot joining.of the petjtioner w Madhya Pradesh. Thus, the impugned orders no longer survive for :. ;:,-limplementatiQn.;. .• ., . ; :,'::: ^ 1 '1 ; .. : '• : '' "'' . .:. 9, Accordingly,1:hepetitionstahdsdisposedof.NoorderastocQsts. Sdf- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^ ."