IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 2ND JANUARY 2009 / 12TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 38081 of 2008(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ BINS K.B, KAVUMPURATH HOUSE, VAZHAKKULAM, MOOVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. 3. K.C.JOSEPH, KALARICKATHOTTIYIL HOUSE, VAZHAKULAM, MOOVATTUPUZHA. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 38081 OF 2008 (H) ==================== Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is challenging Ext.P7, an order passed by the STAT in MVARP No.190/08 allowing the revision filed by the 3rd respondent against an order revising the timings of the petitioner. A reading of Ext.P7 shows that the fixation of timings of the petitioner was found to be without convening a timing conference nor hearing the enroute operators. That factual position is undisputed and if that be so, I cannot find fault with the Tribunal in passing Ext.P7. Counsel contends that the Tribunal has issued a positive direction to resettle the timings of the writ petitioner. I am not in a position to understand the order as canvassed by the petitioner. Now that the matter stands remanded to the Secretary, it is up to the Secretary to consider the matter in accordance with law. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp