(1) WP. 689.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 689 OF 2010 Vilas S/o Yadavrao Pawar and others .. Petitioners VERSUS Smt. Indubai w/o Yadavrao Pawar and others .. Respondents Mr. G.K. Muneshwar, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for the respondent no.1 ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 21ST JUNE, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1] Heard learned counsel. Application was moved for rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure on the ground that the suit was undervalued. The suit is for rendition of account of partnership firm. The payment of Court fees and the valuation of such suit would depend upon the tentative amount calculated by the petitioner or one which is subject to the provisions of section 8 of the Suits Valuation Act. 2] It is well settled that liability for payment of amount, as result of dissolution of the firm, cannot be pre-determined with certainty until the (2) WP. 689.2010 accounts are stated and settled. The final disposal of the suit would be to fix the fix the financial liability after considering the relevant documents and the account books etc. The plaint cannot be rejected outrightly on account of alleged objections stated in the Application. Impugned order does not call for any interference. Petition is dismissed. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp