IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22660 of 2011 1.Ram Ekbal Yadav son of late Musafir Yadav 2.Pappu Yadav son of Mahendra Yadav All R/o village-Baliyaban, P.S.-Naubatpur, District-Patna Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 15.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under sections 341, 342, 323, 308 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, petitioners seek bail. It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that all the offences except section 308 of the Indian Penal Code are bailable in nature. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that there is a case and a counter case and minor scuffle had taken place between the parties on the eve of ‘Holi’. According to him, offence under section 308 of the Indian Penal Code would not be attracted. Taking into consideration the fact that apart section 308 of the Indian Penal Code, all other offences are bailable and there is no serious injury, let petitioners, namely, Ram Ekbal Yadav and Pappu Yadav in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of the order be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Danapur in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No.46 of 2011. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)