Crl. Misc. No. M-34894 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-34894 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.8.2011 Nirmal Singh & others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Ms. Divyadeep Walia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rajesh Bhardwaj, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. Ms. Pooja Chopra, Advocate for respondent No.5. Rajan Gupta, J (oral). This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to restrain respondents No.1 to 4 from accepting false and frivolous complaints by respondent No.5 against the petitioners as also to restrain respondents No.1 to 4 from harassing the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that complaints against the petitioners have been repeatedly inquired into. According to him an inquiry was conducted by Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala into the complaint earlier, thus, Incharge, CIA Staff, Patiala is not entitled to conduct any further inquiry. Learned State counsel submits that inquiries against the petitioners have been conducted in accordance with law. He has referred to letter, Annexure R-1 and submits that the Incharge, CIA Staff has already been directed to conduct inquiry in accordance with law. He further assures the court that petitioners shall not be harassed except if Crl. Misc. No. M-34894 of 2010 2 any case is made out against him. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and given careful thought to the facts of the case. In view of the stand of the State before this court that no harassment shall be meted out to the petitioners and action, if any, will be taken in accordance with law, no further orders are required to be passed in this case. Disposed of. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 10.8.2011 'rajpal'