THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Revision Case No.1503 of 2009 (DATED:11-09-2009) Between: K.Ratna Jyothi W/o Ramesh, R/o Flat No.302, Kanthareddy Apts., Kanthareddy Nagar, Attapur, Ranga Reddy District ….Petitioner A n d K.Ramesh S/o Narasimha Rao @ Elisha and another …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Revision Case No.1503 of 2009 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order dated 12.8.2009 passed in Crl.M.P.No.381 of 2009 in M.C.No.535 of 2008 on the file of Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad. 2. The petitioner and the first respondent herein are wife and husband. The petitioner-wife filed M.C.535 of 2008 under Section 125 Cr.P.C seeking maintenance. The 1st respondent-husband entered appearance. Consequent on his failure to file a counter, an ex parte order came to be passed on 17.7.2009. Thereafter, he filed Crl.M.P.No.381 of 2009 on 07.8.2009 to set aside the ex parte order dated 17.7.2009. The petitioner- wife filed counter resisting the application. 3. The learned Judge, Family Court, on considering the material brought on record, proceeded to allow the petition filed by the husband on payment of costs of Rs.100/-, by order dated 12.8.2009. The said order is under challenge in this revision. 4. Heard learned counsel for the revision petitioner-wife. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submits that despite the petitioner-wife filing an application seeking interim maintenance, no orders have been passed. A further submission has been made that the learned Judge of the Family Court has not assigned any reasons in allowing the petition filed by the husband to set aside the exparte order dated 17.7.2009. 6. I have gone through the material placed on record. 7. A n ex parte order came to be passed on 17.7.2009. The 1st respondent-husband filed Crl.M.P.No.381 of 2009 on 7.8.2009 to set aside the ex parte order. The learned Judge of the Family Court taking into consideration the time gap between the date of ex parte order and the date of filing of the petition to set aside the ex parte order, proceeded to allow the petition on payment of costs of Rs.100/-. In the given facts and circumstances, I do not see any flaw in the order passed by the learned Judge of the Family Court. However, the petitioner is at liberty to make a request to the learned Judge, Family Court to take up the application filed by her seeking interim maintenance. 8. The Criminal Revision case is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. _____________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J 11th September 2009 RAR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Revision Case No.1503 of 2009 DATED : 11-09-2009