IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** C.R. No.8224 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:17.12.2010 M/s Maha Shaktee Rubber .....Petitioner Vs. Kali Charan .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present:- Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. **** Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) The defendant is in revision aggrieved against the order passed by the labour court on 1.2.2010 whereby the application filed by the Management for producing handwriting expert was declined. It has been found by the labour court that the management has availed several opportunities to lead evidence but has failed to conclude its evidence. An application was filed by the counsel for the Management for producing handwriting expert. The said application was dismissed for the reason that the application is not signed by the parties. The aforesaid order was passed by the labour court on 1.2.2010. The present revision petition has been filed after more than ten months of the order being passed whereby the evidence of the petitioner was closed. The order also states that the Management has failed to lead evidence in spite of several opportunities. C.R. No.8224 of 2010 (O&M) -2- In view of the above facts, I do not find any reason to grant further indulgence to the petitioner at this stage. Dismissed. December 17, 2010 ( HEMANT GUPTA ) renu JUDGE