BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Second day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.13060 of 2011 1. KRISHNAN 2. PANDIAMMAL 3. MUTHUPANDI 4. KASTURI 5. BALU 6. PANDIAN @ RICKSHAW PANDIAN 7. VETTU MANI @ MANIKANDAN 8. BHARATKANNAN @ KANNAN 9. K. MAHENDRAN 10. BHARATHI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 TO 10 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANNAVASAL POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.240/2010 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. C.UKKIRA PANDIAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are accused and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 465, 466, 468, 472, 120(b) of I.P.C in Crime No.240 of 2010 on the file of the respondent police. 2. There is no representation on the side of the petitioners. Heard Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3. According to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the case has been registered against the petitioners for the allegation that they have produced bogus sureties before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vilathikulam on the complaint given by one Seenivasan, who is working as an Assistant in the said Court. He would further submit in his argument that furnishing of bogus sureties is a serious one and therefore, the petitioners are not having any right to get anticipatory bail sine they tend to cheat the Court. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and if for any reason the petitioners are released on anticipatory bail, there is a likelihood of tempering of witnesses. Therefore, he request for dismissal of this petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Considering the submissions of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 22/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VILATHIKULAM, TUTICORIN. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANNAVASAL POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. SR : 25.11.2011 : 2P/5C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13060 of 2011 Date :22/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/