MP 1 CRA241_10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 241 OF 2010 Shri Asish Raghunath Bhandare ... Applicant Versus Sau. Meena Ashish Bhandare and another ... Respondents Ms Tejaswani Kadam i/b. Mr. Rahul S. Kate for the Applicant. Mr. P. G. Chavan for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Konde Deshmukh, APP for the State. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. WEDNESDAY, JUNE 08, 2011 P. C. : The applicant challenges the order dated 2nd March 2010 vide which the revision filed by the respondent No. 1 wife, against the order passed by the learned Magistrate refusing to grant maintenance to the respondent wife, was allowed. 2. The respondent No. 1 had filed application for maintenance u/s. 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for maintenance of herself as well as her daughter. The learned Trial Court ordered maintenance @ Rs. 800/- in favour of the daughter. However, the claim of respondent No. 1 wife was rejected. Being aggrieved thereby, a revision was filed by the respondent wife. The same is allowed and the maintenance @ Rs. 1,000/- has been granted. Being aggrieved thereby, the present application. MP 2 CRA241_10 3. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the learned Revisional Court has grossly erred in reversing the order of the learned Magistrate insofar as it refuses to grant maintenance to the respondent wife. 4. Perusal of the impugned order would reveal that the learned Revisional Court has given sound and cogent reasons for arriving at a finding as to why the respondent wife is also entitled to maintenance. 5. No case is made out for interference in revisional jurisdiction. Rejected. (B. R. GAVAI, J)