IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37546 of 2008 KHURUL SINGH @ MAHESH SINGH son of Dadan Singh @ Pirthvi Raj Singh resident of village- Kawara, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 28.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been implicated during course of investigation on the disclosure being made by the co-accused, who was on inimical terms with the petitioner’s family. It is further submitted that the informant himself has filed a petition before the Court below stating to the effect that the petitioner is not involved in this case. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the alleged scooter which was taken by the accused persons was recovered from the house of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case specially the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail. His prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)