1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No. 69/2011 Wadiwel Supaiya Taiwar vs. The Police Station Officer, (P.S.I.), P.S.Karmad and others. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. Ms Preeti Rane, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. T.A.Mirza, APP for respondents. CORAM : MRS. V.K.TAHILRAMANI & M.L.TAHALIYANI, JJ DATE : 30.3.2011 Heard both sides. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he had preferred an application for furlough. However, the said application for furlough came to be rejected on the ground that there is likelyhood of the petitioner absconding and not surrendering back to prison. Against the said order of rejection, the petitioner approached this Court by way of Writ Petition No. 539/2010. By order dated 15.10.2010, this court directed on 18.6.2010 that the petitioner be released on furlough and accordingly the petitioner was released on furlough. 2` 3. The petitioner has now filed the present petition with the grievance that the police authority has sought money in order to give favourable police report. When the police report was called for consideration of his release on furlough, the beat jamadar, who visited his house, demanded bribe of Rs. 5000/- and as the amount was not given an adverse police report was sent. Therefore, this court directed that inquiry be held into the matter. 4. The report clearly shows that the allegations made by the petitioner are without any basis. Moreover, it is noticed that after the petitioner was released on furlough on 27.11.2010 for 14 days till date he has not surrendered back to prison. The petitioner ought to have surrendered back on 10.12.2010. However, thereafter he is absconding. This, in fact, shows that apprehension expressed in the earlier report submitted by the police was correct that, if the petitioner is released on furlough he is likely to abscond. 5. It is noticed that time and again the convicts make totally false and frivolous allegations against police and jail authorities and somehow try to secure furlough or parole by using such methods. We find that this is increasing day by day. In the present case, it is seen from the police report that apprehension expressed therein that if released, the petitioner will 3` abscond was very real. In this view of the matter and the fact that the petitioner has absconded, we do think, this is a fit case to grant any compensation. Hence, the petition is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE patle