IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 20TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 4198 of 2011(Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SHYNI CHANDRAN @ SOJA.C.IYER, AGED 32 YEARS, D/O.MANNIYAMMA, FLAT NO.IA, ARCHANA APARTMENT, PONNURUNNI JN., KADAVANTHRA, VYTTILA, KANAYANNUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.KRISHNADAS P. NAIR SMT.K.L.SREEKALA RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADAVANTHRA, ERNAKULAM-682 020. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM TOWN NORTH, ERNAKULAM-682 018. 3. THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER, ERNAKULAM-682 011. 4. BINUMON, S/O.VIJAYAN, VIJAYA BHAVAN, ALAMPARA, NANDIYODE, PALODE, PACHE P.O., NEDUMANGAD TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, NOW WORKING AT ACS XEROX COMPANY, DMDPK, 3RD FLOOR, VISMAYA BUILDING, INFO PARK, KOCHI-682 030. 5. VIJAYAN, S/O.VIJAYAN, VIJAYA BHAVAN, ALAMPARA, NANDIYODE, PALODE, PACHA P.O., NEDUMANGAD TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 562. 6. VIJAYA, W/O.VIJAYAN, VIJAYA BHAVAN, ALAMPARA, NANDIYODE, PALODE, PACHA P.O., NEDUMANGAD TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 562. WP(C).No. 4198 of 2011(Y) - 2 - 7. BINDU, VIJAYA BHAVAN, ALAMPARA, NANDIYODE, PALODE, PACHA P.O., NEDUMANGAD TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 562. 8. GIPSY P.JITH, W/O.BINUMON, S.N.SADANAM, PANAYARA P.O., VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 145. 9. JITHIN, S.N.SADANAM, PANAYARA P.O., VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 145. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. LAKSHMI NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. *********************** W.P(C) No.4198 of 2011 ***************************** Dated this the 9th day of February, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. Notice to respondents 4 to 9 is dispensed with preserving their right to seek rehearing of this writ petition if aggrieved by this judgment. The learned Government Pleader appears for respondents 1 to 3. There appears to be disputes between the petitioner and the 4th respondent. We do not want to express anything on those allegations. A complaint at the instance of the petitioner is pending with the Palode police. Now the complaint is that there is concerted effort to cause injury to the person of the petitioner while she is residing in Cochin along with her mother in a flat. Respondents 1 to 3 will take care of this complaint and provide adequate protection to the life of the petitioner and her mother. We clarify that in criminal complaints before the Kadavanthra and Palode police stations, the authorities shall take appropriate action in accordance with law. Writ Petition ordered accordingly. (THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) (P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE) rtr/