IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2009 / 1ST ASWINA 1931 LA.App..No. 1078 of 2009(D) --------------------------------- LAR.90/2001 of SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA .................... APPELLANT(S): ADDL.2ND RESPONDENT --------------------------------------------- INLAND WATERWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, PARAMARA SHOPPING COMPLEX,PARAMARA ROAD, KOCHI-682018,REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, (NOW OFFICE AT HOUSE NO.1/631)A,KANADIKADU AREA, MARADU.P.O,KOCHI-682 304. BY ADV. SRI.V.SANTHARAM, SC, IWAI RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT AND FIRST RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NALINI,ASARIKATTIL,ARIKKAVU.PO, KARTHIKAPPALLY. 2. STATE OF KERALA-REPRESENTED BY SPL.TAHSILDAR(LA)NATIONAL WATERWAY NO.III, ALAPPUZHA. SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/09/2009 A/W LAA NO.1788/07, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ L. A. A. Nos.1078 of 2009 & 1788 of 2007 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J Despite the persuasive submissions of Mr.Santharam, the learned counsel for the appellant, having scanned the impugned judgments and having made a quick re-appraisal of the evidence, we are of the view that the enhancement granted under the impugned judgments by the learned Subordinate Judge cannot be said to excessive. This appeal, accordingly, will stand dismissed, but in the circumstances, without any order as to costs. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE K. SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE kns/-