HIGH COTJRT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPIJR Writ Petttion (S) No-6297 of2007 PETITIOPniR Satyanarayan Sethiya, age about 40 years, S/o I^ite Shri Pancham Settiiya, Post Patwari, Ha&a No. 100, Jagdalpur, District BastariCG) RTCSPONDEP^TS Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary (Revenue Departmeat) DKS Bhawan, Saipur(CG) 2. CoUector,DistrictB<Ktar(CG) 3. Virendra Jha, Patwari, P.C. Circle No. 108, Kavapal, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar(CG) WRIT PETITION TJNBER ARTICI.R 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INOIA Appearance: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Uwyer for (he Slate on advance eopy. ORAL ORDER (30.10.2007) SUNIL KIJMAR SINHA. J. Heard. The petitioner, who is workmg as a Patwari, lias challengpd the validity of order dated 31 .8.2007 by which, respondent No.3 is lieing brought to the place offtie petiitionei' and no orders have been passed for the petitionet, but it has been mentioned in the last column of the order that the posting of the persons like petitioner shall be made on the option of the Collectoi' of the district. Admittedly, till date diere is no transfer order ofthe petitioner and the petitioner has challenged the transfer order ofrespondsnt No.3, which is not in accordance with 1aw. Tn view of Ihe ahove, T am not inclined to admit this petition for hearing. The petition is not worth admission. The same w digmissed at the motion stage itself. | ^d/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ~StV)u-/j^