Crl. Misc. No.M-20597 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-20597 of 2011 Date of Decision: September 15, 2011 Ajmer Singh and another …..Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Sushma Chopra, Addl.A.G., Haryana. Mr.S.M. Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioners seek the concession of pre-arrest bail in a case registered at the instance of younger brother of petitioner No.1 Jasmair Singh, alleging that petitioner No.1 alongwith his samdhi petitioner No.2 had inflicted injuries on the person of Mandeep Singh, son of the complainant and the complainant. Petitioner No.1 seems to have a dispute regarding partition of the joint house. So far as injuries attributed to the petitioners are concerned, Crl. Misc. No.M-20597 of 2011 [2] they are simple. Four of the co-accused have been found to be not involved in the case on the basis of the investigation conducted by DSP Head Quarter. Counsel for the complainant has intervened to oppose the petition of pre-arrest bail with submission that the petitioner No.1 is a retired police official and that he had come all the way from Kurukshetra to the Village to cause injuries to the complainant. Without expression of any opinion on merits of the case, it is sufficient to observe that the petitioners have already joined investigation. The injuries attributed to the petitioners are simple. A duel version regarding the occurrence has already cropped up. The petition is allowed. It is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioners they will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the conditions that they will join investigation as and when required by the police and that they will not commit the similar offence of which they are accused of during the pendency of the trial. In case of any such eventuality it will be open to the complainant to seek the cancellation of bail by approaching this Court. This order will remain operative till the presentation of challan. Petitioners will have to furnish fresh bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, in case the prosecution opts to present challan against the petitioners. September 15, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE Crl. Misc. No.M-20597 of 2011 [3]