IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr Misc No 44951 of 2008 Anand Pandey, son of late Baldeo Pandey, resident of Village – Chintamanpur, P S – Vaishali (Belsar), Dist – Vaishali -Petitioner Versus State of Bihar -Opposite Party ----------- 4 10.07.2009 Petitioner apprehends arrest in Vaishali (Belsar) Police Station Case No 86 of 2008 registered under Sections 302/34 of Indian Penal Code. Admittedly, first information report is against unknown person. The informant and petitioner’s wife are sisters. The informant alleges that her husband, the deceased, used to work as a driver and has recently returned from Assam. He had said in the evening that he was going to visit his sister. In the next morning, his dead body was found in a nearby agricultural field. Petitioner submits that petitioner and his wife have been named by the informant in the subsequent statement as suspects because the informant and the petitioner’s wife being sister had received properties from their father in an unequal share, the informant receiving much less. It is out that jealousy that taking advantage of the death of her husband; petitioner is being made an accused. Petitioner’s wife, who has also been made an accused in course of investigation, has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr Misc No 31639 of 2008 by order dated 20.10.2008. In the facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner abovenamed surrenders before the Court below within 4 weeks from today, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing bonds 2 of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali in Vaishali (Belsar) Police Station Case No 86 of 2008 subject to all conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) of Criminal Procedure Code. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh)