IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 12607 of 2010 Date of Decision:- 22.11.2011 Smt. Shanti Devi .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present:- Mr. S.P. Kharti, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta, Addl. AG Haryana for respondent No. 1. Mr. Ajay Kansal, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 4. **** SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J(Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh one challenging Clause (i) of the oustee policy where it has been provided that if 75% or more of the total land owned by the land owners is acquired for the development of Sector then they are entitled for plots under the Oustee Quota and also to challenge the subsequent policy Annexure P-2 . Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE 22.11.2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) reema JUDGE