IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M 24824 of 2009 Date of decision: 21.1.2010 Pishora Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL Present: Mr.HPS Ghuman, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.KD Sachdeva, Addl.A.G., Punjab Mr.FS Virk, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** Harbans Lal, J.(Oral) This petition has been moved by Pishora under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of FIR No.64 dated 25.3.2008 (Annexure P-1), registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 471 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Malerkotla, District Sangrur and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the ground of compromise (Annexure P-2). The grounds pleaded are that the parties have compromised the matter with the intervention of the respectables, therefore, no useful purpose would be served if the proceedings are allowed to continue. A compromise deed dated 25.8.2009 (Annexure P-2) has been executed between the parties. Complainant has also sworn an affidavit, wherein he has stated that he has no objection if the FIR in question is quashed qua the petitioner, as the matter has been compromised. CRM No.M 24824 of 2009 -2- Mr.FS Virk, Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent No.2- complainant has also conceded this fact. In view of the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in re: Kulwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another 2007(3) Recent Criminal Reports (Crl.) 1052, the Court is competent to quash the proceedings on the basis of compromise. Sequelly, this petition is accepted and FIR No.64 dated 25.3.2008 (Annexure P-1), registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 471 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Malerkotla, District Sangrur and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioner. January 21, 2010 (Harbans Lal) gsv Judge