- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.52 OF 2004 Dr.Chandrakant Gulabchand Palod. Petitioner Vs. Shri Vimelendra Saran & Anr. Respondents -- None present. -- CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J DATED : 21st December, 2004. P.C. 1. None present. Perused the records. 2. The grievance of the petitioner relates to non-compliance of the orders passed by the Division Bench dated 18th September, 2003 and 9th December, 2003 in Writ Petition No.4553 of 2003. The first order was to the effect that the petitioner should be reinstated in service subject to the outcome of the inquiry which was pending against him. The 2nd order is on the complaint about the non-compliance of the said order dated 18th September, 2003 and with a direction, the relief was granted in terms of of the prayer clause (a) of the application. The petitioner, - 2 - however, has not annexed the copy of the application to ascertain in order to enable to note the exact prayer which was made in clause (a) of the said application. In any case, the order for reinstatement was subject to the final outcome of the inquiry. The petition making grievance of non-compliance of the said order has been filed on 17th December, 2003. As of today, nothing is on record about the final outcome of the inquiry and whether, till this date, the respondents have not reinstated the petitioner in the service. Being so, there is no case for proceeding against the respondents for contempt of Court in the absence of complete information being available in that regard on record. Hence, the petition is rejected. -----