IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 12TH JULY 2007 / 21ST ASHADHA 1929 RP.No. 222 of 2007(E) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN RFA.42/2004 ..................................... PETITIONER-RESPONDENT NO.1 IN RFA: ---------------------------------------------------------- SHOBHA KUMARI, D/O.NAGAMMA PILLAI, PRABHA SADANAM, KADAKULAM, KEEZHKOLLA, CHENKAL P.O BY ADV. SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER(SR.) SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN SRI.T.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: APPELLANT & RESPONDENTS NO.2 & 3 IN RFA: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SADASIVAN, S/O. SUNDARAM NADAR, BIPIN NIVAS, KADAKULAM, CHENKAL VILLAGE. 2. SUKUMARAN NAIR, S/O. SREEDHARAN PILLAI, MURUKAVILASOM BUNGLOW, KAVALAKULAM, NEYYATTINKARA VILLAGE. 3. SUDHARSANAN, S/O.SIVASANKARA PILLAI, SARASWATHY BHAVAN, OOLATHANNI,KADAVANTARAM DESOM, NEYYATTINKARA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.KOSHY & M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JJ. ------------------------------------- R.P.NO.222 OF 2007 IN R.F.A.No.42 OF 2004 and C.M.Appl.No.336 of 2007 ------------------------------------- Dated 12th July, 2007 ORDER Koshy,J . No grounds are made out in the review petition. A review petition cannot be equated to a petition for rehearing of the matter or an appeal proceedings. If the petitioner is aggrieved, it is for him to file an appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. In any event, no valid grounds are stated for condoning the long delay of 279 days. In the above circumstances, both delay condonation petition as well as review petition are dismissed. Since we have not admitted the review petition, the court fee paid in the review petition shall be refunded. J.B.KOSHY JUDGE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE tks