IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT No. 599 OF 1987 Navinchandra V. Shah & Another .. Plaintiffs Vs. Bansidhar Gopaldas & Co. Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. .. Defendants Mar. Arun Siwach i/b Amarchand & Mangaldas, for plaintiffs. None for defendants. CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD,J. : Dr. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD,J. : Dr. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD,J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 18, 2006. : AUGUST 18, 2006. : AUGUST 18, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. . The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiffs has drawn the attention of the Court to the fact that on 4th September, 2003, 17th September, 2003 and 17th February, 2006 letters have been addressed to the plaintiffs, informing them that the suit is on the warned list of this court and calling upon the plaintiffs to remain present in the Court with all original documents. Counsel states that despite this, no instructions are forthcoming. At this stage, the request made to adjourn the suit cannot be acceded to as the plaintiffs have not responded, despite three letters sent by the counsel. In any event the plaintiffs cannot be indolent in the matter & ought to have taken - 2 - necesary steps required in the proceeding. In the circumstances, the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution. Copies of the aforesaid letters which have been produced before this Court be returned to the learned advocate & Xerox copies be placed on record. [ D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.] D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.] D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.]