IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.R.BANNURMATH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2009 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 8620 of 2009(S) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- CHANDRAPRAKASH D.DEO. V/1085, PANDIT ROAD CORNER, COCHIN-682 002. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.JALEEL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CORPORATION OF COCHIN,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION MAIN OFFICE ERNAKULAM,COCHIN-682011. 2. PRAMODKUMAR SADASIV GORAY, 5/905,GORE CHAMBERS, G.K.AVENUE ROAD, COCHIN-682002. ADV. SRI.C.AJITH KUMAR FOR R2 ADV.SRI.S.RAMESH BABU, S.C.,R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.8620/2009 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT. 19.4.2002. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE STOP MEMO AND PROVISIONAL ORDER DT. 16.1.2008 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DT. 17.12.2007 FILED BY K.PRABHAKARAN, SECRETARY, SWASRAYA MATTANCHERRY. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 6.10.2008 SUBMITTED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR, CORPORATION OF COCHIN. EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DT. 2.2.2009. EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT FOR EXT.P5 COMPLAINT DT. 2.2.2009 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. S.R.BANNURMATH, C.J. & KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.8620 of 2009 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 8th April, 2009. J U D G M E N T Kurian Joseph, J. Petitioner approached this court praying for a direction to consider Ext.P5 complaint regarding the alleged violation of building permit by the second respondent. Learned counsel for the second respondent submits that the matter had already been considered by the first respondent and occupancy certificate was also issued, and this is infact known to the petitioner. It is also submitted that the writ petition itself is misuse of the process of this court since the attempt is only to harass the second respondent. Be that as it may, learned counsel appearing for the Corporation submits that the petitioner was heard on 27.3.2009 WPC NO.8620/09 2 and orders on Ext.P5 will be passed shortly. The writ petition is hence dismissed. S.R.BANNURMATH, Chief Justice. KURIAN JOSEPH, Judge. tgs S.R.BANNURMATH, C. J. & KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.8620 of 2009 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 8th April, 2009.