1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 159 OF 2010 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 229 OF 2009 Smt.Lalmati Fuldev Yadav & ors. ... Appellants v/s Smt.Nirmala R. Yadav ... Respondent Mr.Ashish J. Dubey i/by R.C.Tripathi for appellants. Mr.C.C. Singh for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 9TH MARCH, 2010 P.C.: 1. The appeal has been preferred against the order dated 27.10.2009 passed by the City Civil Court. By this order, the appellants/defendants have been restrained temporarily from disturbing the peaceful use, occupation and possession of the plaintiff of the suit premises without following due process of law. 2. In my view, there is no need to interfere with the order 2 passed. The Trial Court has considered the documents which were placed on record and prima facie concluded that the plaintiff is entitled to be in possession of the suit premises. However, the Trial Court has not granted a blanket injunction. 3. Instead, the defendants are at liberty to initiate action against the plaintiff to evict her by following due process of law. 3. Appeal from order stands dismissed along with the civil application. ..... 3