THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. Z2c ^OF 2004 PETITIONERS /4V7 ^-^ ^-/y ..-" <?<-".••' '.'* .-•' ^y^A/ c-^^j^ ^f^y <5--^.- .G*\^'W--'' ?-.lT\-? -^' , ^^^: <?-' y /' f; 's. -<^^ ^y^ ^' >^^ H- ^ ^' '^^**—'';-^',' ':^f3?yy 1. D.P. 'Agrawal, S/0 Prahllad Rai Agrawal, Aged about 49 years, Presently posted as Supervisor (Adult Education), Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare, Govemment of Chliattisgarh, At present posted m the O/o Block Development Officer, Bilha R/0 Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 2. Prakash Kumar Venna, S/0 B.S. Verma, Aged about 46 years, Presently posted as Supervisor (Adult Education), O/o District Adult Educatioa Officer, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). 3. Basant Singh Baghel, S/0 Jai Narayan Smgh Baghel, Aged about 43 years, Presently posted as Supervisor (Adult Education), O/o District Adult Education Officer, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). Versus 1. RESPONDENTS State ofChhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare, D.K.S. Biiilding, Manb-alaya, Raipiu- (C.G.). ^^ @ V:-sv Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). Secretary, Department of School Education, Govemment of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Buildm^, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). Director, Public Instructions, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA II li.i; %-: U.i'Sj- '. Li ^ss*u-wi&^mE^ -A^-;: 7S['^IFII^PT, ®-fl1y<16,fa<<vfiyij,< ^^f.^o.^^0^/6^ 3^1 'q^T (1pf3^f) 25-10-2004 Slui Sunil Sicha wi& petitioners. Shri U.N.S. Deo, Govt Adv. Heard. The petitioners have filed Ifai^ 1 whereby the r^pondart No. 3 are woridng the department of Division Teachw in the departmen( for the petitioners pointed out tiiat W.P. 2205/2004 and 9 have filed \M that they have submitted representa^ii respective petitions but the same ha^ Having consida'ed the facts| on record, in the opimon ofthis €)( &ection is given to Ihe petitionera Ifaeir grievaaces before fhe coaq)et witfa a copy of fhe petitiai and represaitatfon beiag filed, the decide fhe same on its own merjts possible preferably wilfain six w^< Shiji Sameer Bekar, Advocates for the diNcted Patiehayat '•*>!<lt<1<ill 'wS '?ft^ <1"1*^1< ^'3TRi*T3n^r 'ortheState. petitimi agaiastt the order Annexure P- Asaplion ofthe petitianCTS vdio smd Sodal Wetfa-e, as Upper ofSdiool Edueation. Leamed counsel xrt oftotal 51 persons, 3 have fflted the |.P. No. 3929/2003. Itis ^sopointedout tions as per Amexure P-14 and P-1S in not yet been deeided. and eireum^ances oftfie case material ourt, mds ofjustice will be swved if a o inake a detailed rq»esaitationraisit^ ent aiidiwity of 1he respwidarts id<mg wder, vntfain 10 days, aad <»aieh )etent authnrity of'Ae resp<mdarts diall in accordanee with law as eariy as «ks fixnn Ae date of reee^t rf the tlris c(»nbetent —50,000. ^n '-UUM, Dli^uru^ Wtf'E -^ t^, •-->l-&-hoaLRaacLN sl!ii:! laaLCUHATTISGARHHIGHC^BU^ RI^- wns?i^sp)hr 'S^S -^WW^, W\W16, F^W^ ^.^.^i,,.^.Q......^A.O^^^ svK^ 't^^ ('^3^?) ^hat if aasy grievaaee stiU remains, the law. ^utanitted pursuant to tiae intffim (Mxters prtitioaers have not been relieved. He ]fed to continue till the rq)resentati<Mi is ttfe w^s^'^i "HR^fy ^f t^^'<fs!<$i< r^resentation. ft is ma<te clear petitionere may avail the remedy aijailable under Ae Counsel fat the petitioners passed in W.P. No. 3929/2003, prays that Ihe petiti<Miers be allo^ dedded. The petitionens are direct^d to be allowed to continue tiU Ihe representation is decided. With the aforesaid observatifMis, this Consequently M-W.P.No. 1^65/2004, Certified copy as per roles. us petition stands disposed o£ also stMids di^osed of ^ Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge SLjlM'I^M