1 C.A.No.10922 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10922 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2789 OF 2010 Ratan Asaram Mali ..Applicant Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10923 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2641 OF 2010 Khatunbi Sardar Patel (died), through L.Rs. Faruk Sardar Patel & ors. ..Applicants Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10920 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2642 OF 2010 Sardar Gulab Patel, died, L.R. Faruk G. Patil ..Applicant Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents Mr Ajeet B. Kale, Advocate for the applicants; Mr S.S. Dande, Advocate for respondent no.1; Mrs V.A. Shinde, A.G.P. for respondents no.2 & 3 2 C.A.No.10922 of 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10970 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1793 OF 2010 Asaram Maharu Jadhav, dead, through L.Rs. Kasturabai Asaram Jadhav & ors. ..Applicants Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11045 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1004 OF 2011 Mahemood Vazir Patel ..Applicant Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11043 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1010 OF 2011 Miyalal Lal Patel ..Applicant Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11044 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1005 OF 2011 3 C.A.No.10922 of 2011 Baburao Kashinath Patil, (died), L.Rs. Santosh Baburao Patil & ors. ..Applicants Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11650 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1009 OF 2011 Mahemood Vazir Patel ..Applicant Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents Mr Ajeet B. Kale, Advocate for the applicants; Mr S.S. Dande, Advocate for respondent no.1; Mr S.N. Kendre, A.G.P. for respondents no.2 & 3 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11046 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1003 OF 2011 Shrawan Godha Patil (died), through L.Rs. Premraj Shrawan Patil & ors. ..Applicants Versus The Divisional Officer, MIDC, Nashik & ors. ..Respondents Mr Ajeet B. Kale, Advocate for the applicants; Mr S.S. Dande, Advocate for respondent no.1; Mrs V.A. Shinde, A.G.P. for respondents no.2 & 3 4 C.A.No.10922 of 2011 CORAM : MRS MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 7th October, 2011 PER COURT : Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that near about 87 appeals are filed challenging the award passed by the Reference Court. In 43 appeals this Court has allowed to withdraw the amount of the award deposited by the acquiring body with some conditions. He prays for the similar order for the applications which are listed before the Court today. 2. In these nine appeals, nine applications are made for withdrawal of the amount of the compensation. The order dated 3.9.2011 passed in the connected appeals and the applications is produced before the Court. The similar order is passed in these civil applications also, as follows :- (i) The applicants are allowed to withdraw the 50% amount deposited on furnishing an undertaking on affidavit, stating that in the event the appeals are allowed, then they would deposit the amount in the Court within a period of eight weeks from the date of the judgment of this Court; (ii) Remaining 50% of the amount is allowed to be withdrawn on furnishing a Bank guarantee of any Scheduled Bank (iii) Civil Applications are accordingly disposed of. ( MRS MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) amj/ca10922.11