1 BA 313-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.313 OF 2011 Yunus Umar Ramzan Taverali ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.M.I.Shaikh, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.Geeta P. Mulekar, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 25TH MARCH, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. Applicant was one of the three persons, who had sought to enter the house of the victim. Two friends of the victim actually entered the house. One brandished revolver and the other used knife. The person who used knife is absconding and the person who had brandished revolver is still in custody. The applicant was identified by the 2 BA 313-2011 victim as one who had asked as to whether the house was the same of one Guddu and then two persons entered the house. Thus, applicant's involvement in the crime is clear. Applicant is not entitled to bail. Applicant who has been bailed out was just receiver of the property, & so there is no parity. 3. Criminal Application is rejected. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)