CR No. 1768 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.1768 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.03.2011. Ranbir Singh & others .......Petitioners Vs. Chander Bhan ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Anil Ghanghas, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... SABINA, J. Plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent injunction. Along with the suit, an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure was filed. Vide order dated 11.11.2009, the said application was allowed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) and the defendants were restrained from interfering in the peaceful possession of the plaintiff qua the suit property, except in due course of law. The said order was upheld, in an appeal filed by the defendants, by Additional District Judge vide order dated 23.12.2010. Hence, the present petition by the defendants. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves dismissal. Admittedly, as per the revenue record, plaintiff is CR No. 1768 of 2011 (O&M) -2- described to be in possession of the suit property. The order, vide which the entry in the khasra girdwari has been corrected/changed, was passed during the pendency of the suit and hence the same has rightly been ignored by the appellate court. Hence, no ground for interference is made out. Dismissed (SABINA) JUDGE March 15, 2011 Gurpreet