IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST AUGUST 2011 / 9TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 14390 of 2010(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.V.NARAYANA IYER, AGRICULTURIST, S/O.VARADARAJA IYER,ALLAMPALLAM VILLAGE, VADAVANNUR AMSOM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DIST. BY ADV. SRI.H.BADARUDDIN SMT.B.SHAMEERA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOLLENGODE POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD. 3. K.SUDHAKARAN, S/O.KASINATHAN, MALAYAMPALLAM, PVADAVANNUR VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4. KHADER @ KAYAMUTHU, S/O.MULLAKUTTY RAWTHER, RESIDING AT MALAYAMPALLAM, VADAVANNUR VILLAGE, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.M.CHARISMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 14390 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 31st day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Counsel for the petitioner seeks an adjournment. We are not inclined to grant adjournment. We find that in this writ petition seeking protection for life and also for visiting a particular item of immovable property, this court by order dated 22/7/2010 issued an interim protection in the following terms; "There will be an interim order directing the first respondent to provide protection for the life of the petitioner as against any threat by respondents 3 and 4. We make it distinctly clear that we have refused protection for life, safety and liberty for the petitioner for visiting and looking after his immovable property specified in B Schedule to the Partition Deed located in Vadavannur and Kizhakethara Villages of Chittur Taluk in Palakkad District. This order will remain in force for a period of ten days. " 2.Even though the above order was passed only for a period of 10 days and never extended , we feel that there is justification WPC No.14390/2010 .2. for continuing the above interim order. We continue the above interim order as nobody at the Bar opposed our adopting such a course and we dispose of this writ petition accordingly. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN,JUDGE. dpk