IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 27TH AUGUST 2009 / 5TH BHADRA 1931 LA.App..No. 63 of 2004() ------------------------ LAR.104/2000 of SUB COURT, HOSDRUG .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT: ------------------------- STATE OF KERALA. BY SRI.V.K.BEERAN, ADDL.ADVOCATE GENERAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT: ------------------------ 1. K.MAHIN, MUBARAK MANZIL, MELPARAMBA, P.O. KALANAD, KALANAD VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD DIST. 2. K.IBRAHIM, MUBARAK MANZIL, MELPARAMBA, P.O. KALANAD, KALANAD VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD DIST. 3. K.AYISHA, MUBARAK MANZIL, MELPARAMBA, P.O. KALANAD, KALANAD VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD DIST. 4. K.JAMEELA, MUBARAK MANZIL, MELPARAMBA, P.O. KALANAD, KALANAD VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD DIST. 5. K.ABDUL RAHIMAN ASHRAFF, MUBARAK MANZIL, MELPARAMBA, P.O. KALANAD, KALANAD VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD DIST. 6. K.ABDULSALAM, MUBARAK MANZIL, MELPARAMBA, P.O. KALANAD, KALANAD VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD DIST. 7. K.MUHAMMED SHAREEF, MUBARAK MANZIL, MELPARAMBA, P.O. KALANAD, KALANAD VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD DIST. 8. K.MUNEER, MUBARAK MANZIL, MELPARAMBA, P.O. KALANAD, KALANAD VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD DIST. 9. K.ASIYABI, MUBARAK MANZIL, MELPARAMBA, P.O. KALANAD, KALANAD VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD DIST. 10. K.KAMARUNNISSA, MUBARAK MANZIL, MELPARAMBA, P.O. KALANAD, KALANAD VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD DIST. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.V.T.K.MOHANAN THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ L.A.A.NO.63 OF 2004 -------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of August, 2009. J U D G M E N T Pius C.Kuriakose,J We have heard the learned Government Pleader and Mr.Sundaresan learned Counsel for the respondents. The acquisition was for the purpose of doubling of Railway track from Kannur to Uppala. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded land value at the rate of Rs.50,000- per cent. The Court below enhanced the land value at the rate of Rs.75,000/- per cent. Having gone through the impugned judgment we are of the view that the enhancement granted by the court below cannot be said to be excessive. The appeal stands dismissed. No costs. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE ,JUDGE. K. SURENDRAMOHAN, JUDGE. pm