1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. SECOND APPEAL NO. 136 OF 2001 (Bhagwan Sheoram Bhusari and others .v. Jagdeo Tukaram Bhusari and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri S.R. Deshpande, Advocate for the appellants. Shri A.S. Kilor, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM : C.L. PANGARKAR, J. 15TH JANUARY, 2008. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. A suit was filed by the respondents for partition and separate possession of the suit property. The alleged suit property belonged to Bhimabai, who has left behind three sons and three daughters. The defendant No.1-Bhagwan, the present appellant No.1 herein, claimed that one of the field Nos.95 was given to him exclusively by Bhimabai. The Courts below have found that the oral gift was not valid. There are two concurrent findings that the plaintiffs had 1/3rd share in the suit property. Shri S.R. Deshpande, the learned Counsel for the appellants submits that there is oral gift in favour of the appellants. 2 The submission made by the learned Counsel for the appellants has no value. The parties are Hindus. There cannot be oral gift. The appellants have no case on merit. There is no substantial question of law involved in the matter. The appeal is dismissed in limine. JUDGE *rrg.