1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Second Bail Application No. 7035/2010 Jagdish Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 10.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr SK Jain -for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that statements of Ramesh and Narendra have been recorded. Narendra has been declared hostile and so far as Ramesh is concerned, he has not said any thing against petitioner. Thus, petitioner may be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. He submits that one Komal Mehta is also an eye witness and his statement is yet to be recorded. Thus petitioner may not be granted bail at this stage. 2 After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, bail application is dismissed. Trial court is however directed to record statement of Komal Mehta as the next witness. On recording of above statement, petitioner may file a fresh bail application. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma