IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.574 of 2010 Date of decision: 22.11.2010 Gurminder Singh Grewal and another ....Petitioners Versus Ajmer Singh Grewal and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. R.K. Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Harveen Kaur, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. G.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Plaintiffs have challenged the order dated 9.1.2010 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, thereby directing the plaintiffs to pay ad valorem court fee. Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh Vs. Randhir Singh and others, CA No.2811-13 of 2010 decided on 29.3.2010, has held that if plaintiff is not executant of the sale deed and he is challenging the sale on the ground that his share was wrongly transferred, then he is not supposed to pay ad valorem court fee. In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Suhrid Singh (supra), impugned order cannot be sustained. Petition stands allowed. (Alok Singh) Judge November 22, 2010 R.S.