Crl. Misc. No. M- 1409 of 2009 Daya Nand vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr.Y.P.Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sidharth Sarup, AAG, Haryana. **** While issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court on 19.1.2009:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that co-accused Vidhya Devi has been allowed pre-arrest bail by this Court vide CRM-M No.28636 of 2008 decided on 16.12.2008. The only allegation against the petitioner was that he had entered bill of Rs.197/- instead of Rs.1970/- in the cash book. However, the amount had not been withdrawn from the account of the Gram Panchayat. Notice of motion to Advocate General, Haryana for 25.3.2009. In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be admitted to interim bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. However, he shall join the investigation as and when called and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.” Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Kirori Lal, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation Crl. Misc. No. M- 1409 of 2009 -2- and is not required for further investigation. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the order granting interim bail dated 19.1.2009 is made absolute. (SABINA) JUDGE March 25, 2009 anita