1 ABA 927 OF 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.927 OF 2011 Nandkumar Devu Bhoir .. Applicant. -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Ms. Mallika Ingale with Mr. Sandeep Barve i/b M/s B. K. Barve & Co. for the applicant. Mrs. V. R. Bhosale, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 16th November, 2011 P.C. 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by one Nandkumar Devu Bhoir, who was named at Sr. No.1 in the F.I.R. as a part of unlawful assembly of 13 persons, who launched attack on the complainant's family members. Complainant's father had suffered serious injuries. However, the authors of his injures were named as Santosh Sitaram Bhoir and Ashok Sitaram Bhoir, who are stated to have been bailed out. The applicant alongwith Anil Pandir Bhoir are alleged to have hit one Vikas Bhoir. Anil Pandit Bhoir is also admitted to bail. Injuries of Vikas do not show that they are serious in nature. In view of this the applicant's being in custody for the purpose of further investigation may not be 2 ABA 927 OF 2011 necessary though the learned APP has strong objection to applicant's being admitted to bail. Therefore, in the event of applicant's arrest in C.R. No. 113 of 2011, registered at Murbad Police Station, District: Thane, be released on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.50,000/- on the following conditions : i) The applicant shall make himself available on 19th November, 2011 at 10.00 a.m. for interrogation by the Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required by the Investigating Officer. ii) The applicant shall also furnish his mobile telephone numbers and address and other details to the investigating officer. iii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iv) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. v) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble 3 ABA 927 OF 2011 Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, in S.L.P No.7615 of 2009. vi) Application stands disposed of. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)