IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.73 OF 2005 ALONG WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.365 OF 2003 Mary Joy Pawar ...Petitioner Versus Ashok Ram & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Anil Jadhav i/b Ashok Law Firm for Petitioner. Mr.Vishal Kasbekar i/b Mr.Jeevan Goge for Respondent No.1. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JANUARY 23, 2006. JANUARY 23, 2006. JANUARY 23, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Advocates on record have no instructions to pursue this matter on behalf of the Petitioner. This is so because the Petitioner has taken away papers from their office long back and in fact, have engaged services of some other advocate even : 2 : before the Trial Court. For want of instructions, this Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.