IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14405 of 2011 Binda Prasad @ Brindra Prasad S/O Late Devnarain Prasad R/O Vill.-Motipur Nijamat, P.O.-Lamichaur, P.S.-Bhorey, Distt.-Gopalganj. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj. 3. The Deputy Development Cmmissioner, Gopalganj. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sub-Division-Hathua, Distt.- Gopalganj. 5. The Programme Offcier, Bhorey, Distt.-Gopalganj. 6. The Block Development Officer, Block-Bhorey, Distt.- Gopalganj. 7. The Officer-In-Charge, P.S.-Bhorey, Distt.-Gopalganj. ---------------------------------- 2 13/09/2011. The petitioner who is as PDS dealer prays to quash the notice issued by the respondents by which he has been directed to pay the value of undistributed rice at the APL rate, whereas he had been asked to deposit the value of undistributed rice at different rate. In the facts and circumstances, the petitioner would make a detailed representation before the Block Development Officer, Bhorey, Gopalganj within five weeks, who would dispose of the same within further eight weeks. The petitioner would deposit 15% of the value of the rice indicated in the notice or the rice either in money terms at the rate of Rs.10/- per kilogram. 2 No coercive steps pursuant to the notice would be taken against the petitioner, subject to the aforesaid condition. The writ petition is thus disposed of. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)