<-'<- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. ^0|^ /2011 fS.B.) PETITIONER ^ \iA. ,^3 ^&.--" z.'y RESPQNDENTS ,^---- /y:7: {I / ~t"^~ ^ .^ ^ .,,. ' fH ^.H3-m t ' B ^ ftgfes'iia."-] ?.^ ^ "^ . ^.^ ^ NVS3rg$i'>-^ Komal Prasad Dhruv S/o Late Shri Shyam Lal Dhruv, aged about 25 years, R/o village Arjuni, Tahsil- Balouda Bazar, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS l." State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Deputy Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare, District Durg (C.G.) 4. The Collector, Durg, District Durg (C.G.). 51." The Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Durg (C.G.). 6. --The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Navagarh, Distt.- Durg (C.G.). ini WRITPETITION UNDER_ARTICLE^26 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IN DIA s^? _£OORTOF CHHAmSCASH AT BILASPU5 HON'BLE MR. JCSTICB P&ITINKBR DIWAKER W.P.fSl.NO. 4012/2011 Komal Prasad Dhruv versus State of C.G. & Others Shri Samir Singh, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.Naha Roy, P.L, for the State. WRIT PBTITION UNDBR AB.TICX.B 2260F THE CONSTITyTION OF ORDER (26.07.2011) Grievance of the petitioner in the present petirion is that his father late Shyam Lai Dhruv who was working as Assistant Gram Pasichayat Officer with Gram Panchayat Nawagarh died on 6.1.07. According to the counsel for the petitioner since 2007, he is purauing bis case for compassionate appointment but till date no order has been passed deciding hia claim. Counsel for the State subinits that as the petitioner has passed only V* Class perhaps that may be the reason for the delay in deciding the ciaim ofthe petitioner by the respondents. At this stage, ccMnsel for the petitiQaer submits that the resp. No.4 mav be directed to look into the mattsi- and to direct the competent authority to pass appropriate order. He submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with Uberty to a.pproach the reso. No.4. In the i'acts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with Uberty to filo detailed representation along with all the correspondence already made til! date before the resp. No.4 within three weeks trom today and in turn the resp. No.4 will take appropriate steps to decide the oage of the petitioner in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that this Court h&s not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority eoncemed would be at Mberty to decide the appeal ofthe petitioner in accardance with law. Sd/- prittokerD^aker<