IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 486 of 2009 Between: M/s. Kirlampudi Sugar Mills Limited Rep. by its Managing Director, C. Raghu Ram Pithapuram, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by the Principal Secretary to Govt. of A.P. Revenue (Commercial Taxes), Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commercial Tax Officer Tuni East Godavari District. 3 The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Pithapuram (FAC) East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order direction to the respondents more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent issued notice in Form No.5 under Sec.27 of APRR Act, 1864, dt.20-9-2008 demanding payment of Rs.64,14,179/- with interest for the Asst. year 2004-05 APGST as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and direct the Respondent to call for the records and to quash the notice of attachment. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.NAGA RAGHU Counsel for the Respondents: Sri K. Raji Reddy, Special Standing Counsel for Commercial Tax The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) Learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition so as to enable the petitioner to challenge the impugned order before the appellate authority. Permission is granted. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to costs. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 27th April, 2009 ks