LPA No. 555 of 1994 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No. 555 of 1994 Date of Decision: June 30, 2010 Smt. Omawati Lakshmi Narain ...... Appellant Versus Jang Bahadur and another ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mukul Mudgal, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. L.M.Suri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Khanna, Advocate for the trustees. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Mukul Mudgal, CJ(Oral): The present appeal arises from an order of the learned Single Judge dated 1.2.1994 passed in Civil Misc. No. 9840-CII of 1991 in Probate Case No.3 of 1987. Vide said order an interim application seeking release of Rs. 3 lacs as interim payment during the pendency of the petition, was dismissed. Today, we have been informed by Mr. L.M.Suri, Senior Advocate appearing for the trustees that during the pendency of the present appeal appellant Omawati Lakshmi LPA No. 555 of 1994 2 Narain has expired and no one has come forward to be substituted as her legal representatives. Since the appellant has expired, the appeal has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as such. (MUKUL MUDGAL) CHIEF JUSTICE (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE June 30, 2010 sunita