IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2010 / 1ST POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 38125 of 2010(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- SHIHAB.K.H, S/O.HAMZA, KALAYAMKULAM HOUSE, KECHERY, THRISSUR DIST., PIN-680 501. BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON SRI.MAHESH V.MENON RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THRISSUR RANGE, THRISSUR. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THRISSUR EAST, THRISSUR. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 38125 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T By Ext.P2 order, 2nd respondent permitted the petitioner to impart training in physical training activities mentioned therein. The period of Ext.P2 was two years from 13/12/2008. As the period of Ext.P2 was expiring, petitioner submitted Ext.P3 series of applications seeking renewal of Ext.P2. Orders have not been passed on the application and that led the petitioner to file this writ petition. 2. Although Ext.P2 was issued by the 2nd respondent, petitioner submits that when the 2nd respondent declined to renew Ext.P2, he had to submit Ext.P3 before the 1st respondent. Now that this application is pending before the 1st respondent, I direct the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P3 and pass orders thereon. This the 1st respondent shall do at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp