t-A rs. ^ ^,(W. wSS IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AtiBILASPUR. REVIEW PETITION N0. ^ TS> ^ /2008 APPLICANT ^Ramesh Kumar Mishra S/o Late ./' . •t'Uy^5 i^ Shri Gautam Mishra aged about 1^' .^.-••' 55 years Service R/o Palace Raod ....•)3> Raogarh ,Tahasil and District ^*- . . • .. . • ' ' Raigarh. VERSUS NON APPLICANTS ^Amritial S/o Bodhram Dewangan aged about 65 years, occupation Bunkar , R/o Koshtapara , Purana Badpara, Raigarh, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) Since through his LRS. L//Umabai, aged about 70 years, W/o Amritlal ^'Shyambandhu, aged about 52 years, S/o Amritlal, occupation weaver, 3^- Lakhanlal, aged about 30 years, S/o Amritlal, occupation Labourer, 4, Ku. Kaushalya Bai, aged about 25 ^' years, D/o Amritlal, No. 1 to 4 are resident of Koshtapara, Raigarh Chhattisgarh. TE ,5. Smt. Shyamabai, aged about 40 / years, W/o Rupsai Devangan and D/o Amritlal, ,6. Smt. Shakuntala Bai, aged about 35 .y . years, W/o Murlidhar Devangan, D/o Amritlal, ' No. 5 and 6 are resident of Banglapara, Chakradharnagar, Raigarh Chhattisgarh. y. Nagar Palika Parisad, Raigarh, through Chief Muncipal Officer, Nagar palika Parisad, Raigarh Tahsil and District Raigarh .^<- REVIEW_PETITION UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE. 1 vd-cii '-i.tww-ii, wiS\w\&,.^wwy. _.__^v\ew -Pafitiffv-tMO.i HI*1ril^TTcF •••"""•"••"•••••••T-"^" 3IT^91 CRcp ('jclijel^) ^200 sni^r'piR-ii* aen3il^?Tftt*i t! T'fmane ?;CT8R^lfeT3n^ST couiise Shri Rakesh Pandey, Heard on i.A.No.1, whichl the Limitation Act for condonatiod For the reasons mention< t'ne deiay in fillng this review pet .v" hl^o"^*^'—ff^\ <<—A^*-"»<^^vyi</^ Learned counsel for the out any case for review of the ju' in Second Appeal No.1321 of 19 As a result, the review pel for the applicant. is an application under Section 5 of of delav in filina this review petition. ^d in the application, it is allowed and tion is condoned. fepDticant has not been able to make igment and decree dated 24-09-2007 1^9. <pl<<tn<Ili*iii<')T^?fe'<l •<R>1<<;1>( ^aif^ran^fl ition is dismissed. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge l.:]"I