IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21800 of 2002 Between: Smt. P.Lalitha W/o. Rama Rao, R/o. H.No.3-2-84/1, Shanthi Nagar, Dornakal Village and Mandal, Warangal District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Post Offices, Warangal, Warangal District. 2 The Sub Post Master, Dornakal, Warangal District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Letter dated 26.10.2002 in No. DOA/SAS/MPKBY/02-03 issued by the 2nd Respondent on the basis of Letter dated 25.10.2002 issued by the 1st Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Principal of Natural Justice Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. A. Prabhakar Rao Counsel for respondents: Mr. Andapalli Sanjeev Kumar The Court made the following Order: In this writ petition, the petitioner has questioned Lr.No.DOA/SAS/MPKBY/02-03 dated 26-10-2002 issued by the second respondent, Sub Post Master, Dornakal, Warangal District. 2. The petitioner was appointed as an agent for collecting subscription amount of National Savings Certificates and Kisan Vikas Patra. While the agency is in force, the impugned letter has been issued by the second respondent instructing the petitioner not to accept any deposits in connection with the said schemes. It is stated that so far as National Savings Certificates scheme is concerned, the agency of the petitioner was valid upto 31-12-2004 and her agency with regard to Kisan Vikas Patra was valid upto 12-04-2005. 3. As much as the period for which agency was granted to the petitioner has already expired, the petitioner is not entitled to continue as an agent and no relief as sought for can be granted. However, if the petitioner is entitled for commission for the deposits already received by her during the pendency of the writ petition or prior to passing of the impugned order, the amount, if any payable to her towards commission shall be paid to her by the respondents. 4. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. ________________________​ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. June 24, 2009 MRR ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MADHURI}