IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15181 of 2009 Date of decision: 20.01.2011 Sandeep Kumar Hooda ...Petitioner Versus Vaish Education Soceity, Rohtak etc. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Sajjan Singh Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.S. Saini, Advocate for the respondents. RANJIT SINGH J. This order will dispose of two Civil Writ Petitions No. 15181 of 2009 and 6860 of 2010. The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the District Judge, whereby the termination order of the petitioner was set aside but with the direction that the petitioner would not be entitled to any salary for the period he was not working with the College. The petitioner, accordingly, has challenged that part of the order through the present writ petition. The respondent-college has also filed a writ petition to challenge the same order impugning the remaining part of the order whereby the termination of the petitioner was held to be illegal. When queried, counsel for the petitioner/Lecturer says that he is no more interested in backwages as he has got alternative job where he has joined the petitioner was not reinstated for considerable period. The petitioner in my view, may not be entitled to the backwages for the period he has not worked. The counsel for the Civil Writ Petition No.15181 of 2009 -2- petitioner very fairly says that he would not press this writ petition. CWP No. 15181 of 2009 is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed. Counsel appearing in CWP No. 6860 of 201 says that the writ petition filed by the management is rendered infructuous and the same is also disposed of as infrcutuous. January 20, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE