\^ ^ SiiGlE IEft b ^y^y^c;.^^ ^^•^^\^t\^ v IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. N0...f4s^2^2005 PETITIONER ^ :\^4^'. ^vvy^ ^^y/ ^w^'..^ ..^'M ^^ ^; .<s^\?; ^.^^ Ramesh Chandra Gulati Aged about 48 years S/0 Shri Banarsi Das Gulati Food Inspector Food Civil Supplies Corporation, Arang District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDDENTS 1. ^'^ State of Chhattisgarh Through the Principal Secretary Department of Food and Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Food Controller State of Chhattisgarh Collectorate, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Harikrishan Rathore Food Inspector Presently posted at Arang C/0 Collector, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE QF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS: <11*1«I^TW \dw|'-qiqic)«,tPT^<<-l<l<c,RrtW^< HP/^38^/DB. 3TT^^T^TR^i<h ?CT3n^$T^*lW liNi'1^- 3TI^?T q^f? (^cji^cj^) W^200 S^TST?;Hf^T3n^^T 08.11.2005 Jiteu<ftra aald Petitioner by Shri Jiteu<plr Respondeats No. 1 Govt, Advocate. Heard. The petitioner was ^ Inspector ia Block- Aran.g. Thl flie District ia the departmeitit traasferred flie petitioner witliia flie saine distoiict a| froiii MHiister-ia-Charge. Leamed counsel for the coniplete baa on traiisfer ar corapetent officer to traasfer Inspector. After hearmg learaed pei-usmg aU fhe records, ] 18.8.2005 Class-III and Clas; €bl^lfrt41yl^Hc^'^'fe^l ^^i^ ^3rf^H3TI^^T Pali, Advocate. 2 by Shri Arun Sao, Deputy rorkiag on the post of Food Food ControUer, who is head of it, vide order dated 31.08.2005 Block Arang to Raipur city i.e. ler obtamiiig approval of the petitioner submits fhat fhere is |d fhe Food Confaroller is not a fhe petitioner, wlio is a Food coiuisel for the parties aiid found fhat by memo dated ^-IV eraployees are pennitted to be traiisfeiTed due to admu|dstrative exigency after gettiag approval of fhe Mmister-ia-C^arge. The petitioner is a Class- *ii*tcnmm^ v3-CTfT^I«10<<,tPT?1<<-l<l<<, RlriW^ ^^P| 43^/05 (^ 3TT^^T^rRHi<b ^TT3n^$T^^I<h ri»< ^^, 3TI^?T q^q? (ijc|[j6|<£j) ^200 S^TTWI^f??T 3TT^$T III eiaployee aiid fhe order petitioner froni one Block distdct, Iftliere is no mentioil h|as been passed tran.sfeiTing tlie fhe city ie. withia the saaie about admiaistrative reasons ra tb the order, it would not me^ui fhat fhe order suffers from arbitrarmess or it has been such no uiterference is called extraorditiaiy jurisdiction Constitution of India. ^assed coxitraiy to tiie poUcy. As for by fhis Conrt exercisiag the under Article 226 of the In view of the foregoia^ is dismissed. No order as to :.^ <pi<-ifo<i1Ti ^iHoT^'faMSl ^Rfl^i^ ^3ri^T3n^$T , the petition deserves to be and ttosts, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge SP/FS/2005-20,000 v6'^?'