[ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1720 OF 2008 Shankarlal s/o. Maniklal Binani and anr. ... Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ... Respondents. Mr. S.K.Chaurasia i/b. Kavita Gandhi for the petitioner. Mr. Milind More AGP for respondent No.1. Mrs. Archana Joshi for Rspondent No.2-Corporation. CORAM CORAM CORAM : P.B.Majmudar and : P.B.Majmudar and : P.B.Majmudar and A.A.Sayed, A.A.Sayed, A.A.Sayed, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : September 8, 2008. : September 8, 2008. : September 8, 2008. P.C. 1. By filing this petition, the petitioner has prayed that the respondent-Corporation should take an appropriate action in connection with the illegal construction carried out by the respondent No.3. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent No.3 is carrying out construction illegally and contrary to the sanctioned plan. The learned Counsel Mrs. Joshi appearing for the respondent No. 2- Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay states that the corporation has already served a notice under Section 353 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act to [ 2 ] respondent No. 3. She submitted that proper follow up action will also be taken in accordance with law. She further states that if any application is received for regularisation of the structure, the same shall be processed and considered in accordance with law. 3. In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for respondent No.2-Corporation, nothing survives in the petition. The petition is disposed of accordingly. [P.B.Majmudar, [P.B.Majmudar, [P.B.Majmudar, J.] J.] J.] [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, J.] J.] J.]