:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITION NO.421 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.421 OF 2007 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.421 OF 2007 Shri Pramod Kashinath Vaidya ...Petitioner. v. Smt. Sangita Dhaygude & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.Sachin Tingade for Ajit Ram , advs. for the Petitioner. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 4th March, 2008. DATE: 4th March, 2008. DATE: 4th March, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. 2. One Prabhakar Laxman Vaidya had filed a civil suit challenging the notice issued by the Municipal Council, Khed for demolition of certain structure put up by him, within 30 days. The trial Court held that it had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit in view of Section 149 of the M.R.T.P. Act. His appeal also came to be dismissed. Then he filed the civil writ petition no.10701 of 2004. The writ petition was also dismissed by this Court. In the last paragraph of the order passed in the writ petition, following observations were made: " In case the notice for demolition has not been acted upon even now, the petitioner is at liberty to file his reply and may submit consent :2: letter of his nephew for consideration of the Municipality and is granted four weeks time to do so." 3. The present petitioner contends that the said order was passed without making him party in the writ petition and in spite of his right over the property as co-owner, Municipal Council has permitted the said Prabhakar to make construction and that too without obtaining consent of his nephew. In fact, as per the above observations, only liberty was given to the petitioner to file his reply and to submit consent letter of his nephew within a period of four weeks from dismissal of the writ petition. It is for the Municipal Council to consider his reply on its own merits. If the present contempt petitioner is aggrieved by the permission granted by the Municipal Council, he may take appropriate action as may be permitted under the law but certainly there is nothing to show that the contempt of this Court has been committed by any act or omission. 4. Therefore, contempt petition stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)