IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 9515 of 2011-B Decided on: 8th November, 2011. Navendu Shekhar. …Petitioner. Versus H.P. State Electricity Board Ltd. …Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. R.S. Chandel, Advocate, vice counsel for the petitioner. For the Respondent : Mr. Narender Singh, Advocate, vice Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- “(i) Writ in the nature of mandamus, appropriate writ, order or direction in nature thereof, directing the respondent to relieve the petitioner from Bhavanagar, a Tribal Area to Jogindernagar forthwith without insisting upon the condition of substitute.” 2. It is seen that the petitioner has submitted representation Annexure P-2 and the action on the representation has to be taken by the respondent. There will be a direction to the respondent to look into Annexure P-2, representation and take appropriate action in accordance with law and justice within a period of three weeks, if the 2 impugned order Annexure P-1 is still in force, from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 8th November, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (hl/kck) Judge.