IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2571 of 2008 NAGENDRA YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 01.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and section 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the present complaint has been filed for ulterior purposes. It is further submitted that as a matter of fact the informant at many times on her own had left the matrimonial house and went to her parent’s house. It is further contended that during investigation the case of the prosecution were not found correct as the witnesses have not supported the case. It is also contended that in the criminal case the informant and family members of the petitioner have amicably settled the matter and accordingly a petition for compromise has been filed. Learned counsel has produced the certified copy of the said petition, which is kept on record. Learned Addl. P.P., on the other hand, on perusal of the case diary submits that the witnesses have stated to the effect that at many times the petitioner went - 2 - to bring the informant back, however the brother of the informant resisted on different grounds. Having considered the submissions, as noticed above, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, namely, Nagendra Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari in connection with Harsidhi P.S.Case No. 45 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)