IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2011 / 26TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21109 of 2011(K) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SMT.CHANDRAMATHY AMMA, D/O.KARTHYAYANI AMMA, CHANDIRAZHATHU, THEKKUM BHAGAM, KULASEKHARAMANGALAM. BY SRI.S.SREEKUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE, ADVS. SRI.M.A.MOHAMMED SIRAJ, SRI.P.PRIJITH, SRI.ANEESH JAMES. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM, PIN-686 001. 2. THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, KOTTAYAM, PIN-686 001. R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/08/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.21109/2011-K: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE DTD. APRIL 2010 ISSUED BY THE R.1. TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 26/07/2010 ISSUED BY THE R.2. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 20/12/2010 ISSUED BY THE R.1. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.13880/2011 DTD. 24/05/2011. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE CHALLAN DTD. 20/07/2011 FOR REMITTANCE OF REQUISITE FEES FOR RENEWAL OF EXT.P.2. PERMIT. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A. NO.238/2011 DTD 08/04/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 21109 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of August , 2011 J U D G M E N T Ext.P1 is the NOC obtained by the petitioner for mining of ordinary sand. On the strength of Ext.P1 she had also obtained Ext.P2 permit. Subsequently when the validity period of Ext.P2 expired, the petitioner applied for renewal of the permit. When the renewal application was pending, Ext.P3 order was issued by the first respondent cancelling Ext.P1 NOC. 2. Subsequently the petitioner challenged the aforesaid proceedings before this court in WPC 13880/11 which resulted in Ext.P4 judgment by which Ext.P3 order was set aside. According to the petitioner, now by virtue of Ext.P1 NOC, she is entitled to get Ext.P2 permit renewed. It is with this contention the writ petition is filed. W.P.(C) No. 21109 OF 2011 :2 : 3. From the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and also that of the learned Government Pleader it is obvious that the applications said to have been made for renewal of Ext.P2 is still pending consideration of the 2nd respondent. 4. Therefore I dispose of the writ petition directing the 2nd respondent to pass orders on the renewal application after duly adverting to Ext.P4 judgment of this court which set aside Ext.P3 order. 5. This the 2nd respondent shall do at any rate within 2 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE W.P.(C) No. 21109 OF 2011 :3 : ul/-