IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.569 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5221 OF 2004 M/s.G.S.L.(India) Limited ..Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents ---- Mr.Ashok M.Saraogi for the applicants. Mr.A.S.Shitole APP for the State. ---- CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J DATE : 8TH OCTOBER, 2007 PC 1. Heard Mr.Saraogi for the applicants. 2. This is an application for restoration of Criminal Application No.5221 of 2004 which was dismissed in default. As per the office note, the application is filed belatedly i.e. after one year. Delay condoned. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause-(a). (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J) : 2 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5221 OF 2004 M/s.G.S.L.(India) Limited ..Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents ---- Mr.Ashok M.Saraogi for the applicants. Mr.A.S.Shitole APP for the State. ---- CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J DATE : 8TH OCTOBER, 2007 PC 1. Heard Mr.Saraogi for the applicants. 2. This is an application for quashing the complaint being complaint no.1180/S of 1999 filed by the present respondent no.2. 3. The applicants have an alternate and equally efficacious remedy to file a revision application under Section 397 of Cr.P.C. in the Sessions Court so as to challenge the order of issuance of process in criminal case no.1180/S/99. 4. Hence, the application is disposed off with liberty to approach the Sessions Court. : 3 : (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J)