IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7356 of 2010 1. SUSHILA DEVI W/O LATE SATYANARAYAN PANDEY @ RAMANAND PANDEY R/O VILL BARUATTA, P.S.& DISTT-JAMUI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR JAMUI 3. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR(LAND REFORMS) JAMUI 4. THE CIRCLE OFFICER JAMUI 5. NAVIN PANDEY S/O LATE JHARKHANDI @JHARO PANDEY R/O VILL BARUATTA, P.S.DISTT-JAMUI 6. URMILA DEVI D/O YUGAL KISHORE PANDEY R/O VILL BARUATTA, P.S.& DISTT- JAMUI ----------- 02. 06.05.2010 After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner has chosen to withdraw the writ application in the light of the averments made in the counter affidavit to pursue his remedy before the competent Civil Court and apply for injunction in the event his possession over the lands in-question is threatened by the private respondents in the light of the orders passed by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms. The writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha, J.)