1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR L.P.A. NO.309 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4644 OF 2009 (D) (Shri Vivek Madhukarrao Ambekar .vs. Shri Jain Sewa Samiti, Chandrapur and Ors..) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH AND R.K.DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : 16th September, 2010. Heard Mr. P. N. Shende, Adv. for the Appellant. By this appeal, the appellant challenges only that part of the order of the learned Single Judge by which the learned Single Judge has held that the School Tribunal was not justified in directing payment of full backwages to the appellant. The learned Single Judge has modified the order of the School Tribunal because he found that there are no pleadings. The learned Counsel for the appellant has pointed out to us the pursis filed by him before the School Tribunal saying that he was not gainfully employed after his services were terminated. In our opinion, the pursis will not take the place of pleadings or evidence and therefore, no exception can be taken to the finding of the learned Single Judge that there are no pleadings or evidence about absence of gainful employment on the part of the appellant. Hence, the Letters Patent Appeal is rejected. jais JUDGE JUDGE 2 jais