1 wp6229-11.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6229 OF 2011 Rajesh Vijay Wanjari .. Petitioner Versus Pandita Ramabai Mukti Mission and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.A.P.Vanarase for petitioner’sMr.P.G.Samant AGP for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 5th September 2011. P.C.: 1] Heard Mr.Vanarase for petitioner. He submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the direction at Serial No.3 in the impugned order of the Presiding Officer of the School Tribunal, whereunder upon reinstatement of the petitioner in service, liberty has been given to the management to conduct fresh enquiry against the petitioner from the stage of filing of list of witnesses and documents and with further direction to complete that enquiry expeditiously. 2 wp6229-11.doc 2] From a perusal of the order of the School Tribunal with the assistance of Mr.Vanarase, what I find is that the charge against the petitioner was indeed serious. If the charge was of molesting a girl student and that when the enquiry was conducted, the objections that were raised were found to be of technical in nature and they having been upheld, I do not see how the School Tribunal has committed any perversity or the order is vitiated by any error of law apparent on the face of record, while allowing the petitioner’s appeal, granting reinstatement but permitting Management to hold fresh enquiry, since the enquiry is held to be vitiated only on technical ground, as enumerated particularly while discussing point No.2 and the conclusion recorded. The ultimate liberty granted need not be interfered with particularly in the light of the facts emerging from the records of this case. The petition is, therefore, devoid of any merits and it is dismissed summarily. No costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J) 3 wp6229-11.doc