1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 734 of 2008 WITH CAS NO. 1877 of 2008 in SA 734 of 2008 Shri Madhav Sadashiv More ....Appellant v/s. The Municipal Corporation of City of Pune (through its Commissioner) ....Respondents Shri Prathamesh A. Gokhale h/f. Adv. Rajesh P. Behere, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED:- September 11, 2009. P.C. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. This Appeal is directed against the concurrent finding of fact. Having considered the rival submissions, I am of the opinion that the concurrent view taken by two Courts below on the factual matrix is unexceptionable. If those findings are to be up held, there is no infirmity committed by the Courts below for which reason any substantial questions of law will arise for consideration. Hence, dismissed. 2 3. In view of this order, Civil Application is also disposed of. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)