1 Cri.A.3087/10 abs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3087 OF 2010 Smt. Sangeeta Lalsaheb Mishra .. Applicant V/s Harishchandra Ramkrishan Maurya & Anr. .. Respondents Ms. Veena R. Gautam i/b Pandey & Co. for the applicant. Mr. Rajesh More, A.P.P. for the State. Mr. B.R. Maurya for respondent no.1. Mr. P.J. Kurhade, P.S.I., Dadar Police Station, present. CORAM : N.D. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 15TH OCTOBER 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. Ad-interim relief in terms of prayer (b) was granted before notice was issued to the complainant – respondent no.1. 3. Mr. More, learned A.P.P. for the State, on instructions of Mr. P.J. Kurhade, P.S.I., Dadar Police Station who is present in the Court, states that the matter is under investigation. There is a common dispute over running of a flour mill and possession thereof. Parties have rival claims over possession of flour mill 2 Cri.A.3087/10 premises and the matter is pending before the City Civil Court. The complaint discloses the offences which are non-cognizable such as under sections 380, 406, 407, 468, 471, 420 read with 120-B and 506 (Part II) of the I.P.C. It is informed that out of the 5 accused named in the complaint, 2 have been arrested and subsequently released on bail. The other accused are absconding and the present applicant is daughter-in-law of the main accused. All accused are the members of the same family and had common intention and interest in the dispute. As such, the complaint requires further investigation to do justice to the parties. Merely because the applicant is a woman, the application cannot be entertained for quashing the proceedings against her. 4. After hearing both the sides and upon perusal of the record, no case is made out for quashing the complaint. The application is rejected. Ad-interim order of stay stands vacated. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.)