1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.322 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.433 OF 2010 Ms. Leeladevi N. Saigal ...Appellant. v. Tekchand J. Merani ...Respondent. Mr.M.P.S.Rao i/by P.M.Havnur, advs. For the Appellant. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : APRIL 5, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the appellant/plaintiff. Appeal is filed against the refusal of ad-interim relief while the notice of motion is still pending. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances, in my considered opinion, following direction will meet the ends of justice: i Defendant/respondent shall file reply to the notice of motion within three weeks from this date and the trial Court shall expedite the hearing and dispose off the notice of motion as early as possible and preferably before the summer vacations. 2 The appeal and the application stand disposed off accordingly. While deciding the notice of motion, the Court shall not be influenced by 2 any of the observations made in the impugned order on the prayer for ad-interim relief. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)