IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.2684 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision :26.4.2010 Harbans Lal ....Petitioner Versus Ms.Monica Rana ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr. J.S.Mannipur, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. C.M.No.10312-CII of 2010 Allowed as prayed for. C.R.No.2684 of 2010 There is no reason to interfere in the discretionary relief granted by the learned trial Court wherein the petitioner has been restrained from alienating the suit property in favour of any other person except the respondent, which fact assumes significance because the petitioner had been put in possession ostensibly as a measure of part performance of the agreement. The next grievance that has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that his application for getting the suit decided has not been decided so far. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner on this C.R.No.2684 of 2010 (O&M) -2- aspect of the matter, the petition is disposed of with an expectation from the learned trial Court that it shall decide all the pending applications as expeditiously as possible. 26.4.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss