IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 22ND MAY 2009 / 1ST JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 9621 of 2009(W) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SAILESH KUMAR.T., ASSISTANT CONTROLLER, LEGAL METROLOGY, RESIDING AT 'SARANYA', FRIENDS LANE, THOTTAKKATTUKULANGARA, ALUVA. BY ADV. MR.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT CIVIL SUPPLIES & CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CONTROLLER, LEGAL METROLOGY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. *ADDL.R3 IS IMPLEADED: R3. SHAJI K.ABRAHAM, PROPRIETOR, GARLAND WEIGHING SERVICES, B2, S3, KB PARK, VINOBHAJI ROAD, EDAPPALLY, COCHIN – 682 024. (*ADDL.R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DTD. 22/05/2009 IN I.A.NO.9871/2009) R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN ADDL.R3 BY ADV. DR.VINCENT PANIKULANGARA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.9621 of 2009 -------------------------------------- Dated 22nd May, 2009 JUDGMENT Sri.S.Muhammed Haneef, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Government have revoked the order of suspension and reinstated the petitioner in service. He also submits that the petitioner has thereupon joined duty as Assistant Controller of Legal Metrology in Malappuram District. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in these circumstances no further orders are called for in this writ petition and that it may be dismissed as infructuous. The said submission is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. P.N.RAVINDRAN Judge TKS P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ------------------------------------- I.A.No.4871 of 2009 in W.P.(C)No.9621 of 2009 -------------------------------------- Dated 22nd May, 2009 ORDER Dr.Vincent Panikulangara, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the writ petitioner was placed under suspension on a complaint filed by the applicant and therefore the applicant is a necessary party in this writ petition. In the light of the fact that the Government have revoked the order of suspension and reinstated the petitioner in service, the request made by the applicant cannot be entertained. The I.A. is accordingly closed. P.N.RAVINDRAN Judge TKS