1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Cr Misc Bail Application No.4303/2010 Virendra Chawla Versus The State of Rajasthan through PP 27.5.2010 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Rakesh Chandel for Mr PC Bhandari - for petitioner Mr Peeyush Kumar, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that there exist cross cases and first FIR was lodged by the petitioner for commission of same offence as has been alleged against him. Looking to the fact that petitioner and the complainant are neighbourers the matter has been settled and otherwise the incident took place in hot-haste, petitioner may be granted bail. On the other hand, learned PP has opposed the bail application. After taking into consideration rival submissions of 2 the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, but looking to the facts of this case, I am inclined to allow this bail application under Section 438 CrPC. Therefore, the SHO/IO of the Police Station – Shivdaspura, District – Jaipur is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner/s Virendra Chawla in FIR No. 2/2010 registered for offence under Section/s 143, 341, 323, 452, 427 and 379 IPC, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i)He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii)He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)He shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (iv)He shall not commit same and similar offence during the period of bail. (MN Bhandari), J. bnsharma