fo-o/ Ss^feK^ sENCI PETniONER: ^ /w IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATnSGARm WRIT PETITION N0. •ZSM'i- /2006. Ravindra Kumar Yadav, S/o Rupau, Ram, aged about 39 years, Assistant Teacher, Govemment CKanyo: 0 c.hl-d.Ti" Madhyamik Shala, Saja, TahsU and Post Saja, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. Respondents .A>Q\^ ^ ^ <\'v^ VERSUS 1. State of Chhatdsgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Departinent Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director of School Education Officer, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The District Education Officer, Through" Pricipal Goveminent Girls Higher Secondary School, Saja, Durg, Chhattisgarh. /' * fG/' Cr WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE f^G^ ^ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN " ^ THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. PROHIBITION G' ANDFORTHEOTHERSIMILARWRITORWRITS.ORDEROR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. XI-HC-78 *ll*l^ll 9l*l|tfi 3:5^'?TPIRTBT, ®-rfl'M'IG,Rtciwy ..^f?J^.^/.e.4. ^ 200 3T^rtl1cn ('ict^c"t.liT) snN'w R-<i+ tlsifan^rstiHicti ?^nw trf?(T sn^r 7.8.2006:- Heard Shri O.P. Sahu, counse Shri Sumesh Bcyqj, S.A. for t|ie respondents, on advance copy. By this petition, the petition^jr has prayed that respondents be directed to grant two advance increments to fl the B.T.I examination on his own exp^nses. The case of the petitioner Teacher on 1.5.1991 vide Anne^. 24-12-1998 issued by erstwhile Sta1|i is that he wos appointed 03 Assistant <ure P-3. As per Instructions ddt-ed "y1<.fi.i*~<'^ |e of M.P. the Assistant Teachers who have treatment is not bemg yven to him. Therefore, tearned counsel petitioner mcy be allowed to make No.3 and in turn. he be directed to which Shri Bqjcy, leamed 6ovt. Advo Havim heard learned counsel the case, the petitioner is allowed tc^ qipifwfrr iTroff ir'te^l-rfsTRR ^arf^iTsn^r for the petitioner. he petitioner, as the petitioner has passed passed the B.T.I. examination befor]e 22.10.1964 are entitled for two advance increments and the teachers who |iave pcssed the B.T.I. examination after 22.10.1964 on their own expenses ar^ also entitled for two advance increments. Other similarly situated persons h<^/e moved an application before the State Administr'ative Tribunat, Bench at i:|;aipur, the Tribunal has granted relief to them ond based on that they have l^een granted two advance increments. The petitioner had passed B.T.I. examin^tion on his own expenses in the yeac 1994 vide Annexure P-5 and inspite of re^resentation made by the petitioner similor for the petitioner submits that the a detaited representation to respondent ^lecide the same in accordance ncith law, to {:ate for the State has no objection. fw the parties, havina regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, with^ut expressing any opinion on the merit of make adetailed representation along with P.T.O. w XI-HC-78 3^ •<<l<11c|4|, BTn*t'16, RtllUy H i+ifii sfitndi ^ 200 3TT^?T<4;<ch (lyi^<s<^) 3:n|3T^TR-fi<ti craT3n^rshHi<ti Roshan ^ :? ^ STdTWHfi'g'sn^T 2^-1 copy of this petition raising all hi^ period of 15 dcys from today and examine the case of the petitionei^ petitioner in this petition and in th< ^pifefrr WRif tf te'^t'tRrRK ^siRnrsn^r grievmces to respondent No.3 within a in turn, respondent No.3 is directed to in the iight of averments made by the representation also. If respondent No.3 reaches to the conclusion that stmi|crly situated persons have been granted benefit of tiwo advonce increments atid the petitioner's cose is also cover'ed for gr'ant of two advance increments on pass orders within a period of 3 monl With the direction aforesaid, Parties are entitled for certi'flied copy of this order. the basis of Gwemment's order, then to hs from todoy, in accordance with law. the petition stands disposed of. Si3l- -C. BihgOBo Judge P.T.O. ^^^^ '^f'^~^:^~ '•:':,^^^^.l^^^^-^^^'^^^~f-^^^'^,