IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11530 of 2010 1. NISAR HUSSAIN, S/o Abdul Rashid. 2. Farid Ahmad, S/o Late Abdul Hamid. 3. Anjum Abid, S/o Md. Yusuf Gani. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 15.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 364 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the brother of the informant was allegedly kidnapped by the accused persons since he had failed to return the money to co-accused, Faruque with whom had similar business transaction in Jammu & Kashmir. When the victim was recovered he also supported this fact. The petitioners are relatives of Faruque and have no criminal antecedents. In view of such, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with 2 Begusarai Mufassil P.S. Case No. 43 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and the other bailor will be local in nature since the petitioners belong to Jammu & Kashmir. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the fact that the petitioners belong to Jammu & Kashmir. 3 The petitioners undertake not to raise objection in case the witnesses are examined without their presence during trial so that there is no delay in the same for this reason. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)