IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.203 OF 2002. IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4709 of 2001. Sohan Lal son of Shri Isardas Punjab VERSUS Shri Abhay Kumar, I.A.S. District Collector, Dausa & Another Date Of Order ::: 30/04/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Mr. Paker Farooq, Counsel for the Petitioner Mr. R.D. Rastogi } Mr. Dinesh Yadav } Counsel for the respondents Mr. Hanish Khan } By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has preferred this contempt petition for the disobedience of the order of this Court dated 27.09.2001 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4709 of 2001. Although, there is no specific direction by this Court, which can be said to have been violated by the respondents, but according to the petitioner, the respondent no.1 has passed an order on 10.10.2001, which is said to be contrary to the order dated 27.09.2001 passed by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to refer any document to show that the Collector had knowledge about the order dated 27.09.2001 before passing the order dated 10.10.2001. Apart from above, the learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that the respondent has not touched the land of the petitioner, and his land has not been included in the order dated 10.10.2001, therefore, no contempt is made out in the facts and circumstances of the present case. A copy of `jamabandi' of the disputed land of the petitioner showing the name of the petitioner has also been placed on the record. No rejoinder to this reply has been filed by the petitioner. In view of above, I do not find any disobedience of the order of this Court. The contempt petition is accordingly dismissed. The notices of contempt stand discharged. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/