IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CR.APPLN/5021/2010 SHANKAR KUNDLIK KOKATE AND ORS V/S STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Shri Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for applicants and Shri N.B.Patil, APP for respondents. ... CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL,J. Dated : January 10, 2011 PCR COURT :- 1. Heard respective counsel. 2. In Crime No.9 of 2010 registered with Pathardi Police Station for offences under sections 452, 379, 323, 5604, 506 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, pre-arrest bail is sought. 3. Earlier transaction between the parties is illustrated Sister of the accused / applicants is wife of complainant. The accused / applicants had given an amount of Rs.65,000/- to the complainant four years ago for purchasing a tractor. The complainant was harassing the sister of the accused / applicants for illegal demands. Even it is informed that on one occasion he threatened to consume poison and report was lodged in that respect to the Police Station. 4. Considering the nature of accusation having given rise to offence for the incident of the accused/applicants taking away Rs.10,000/- and gold ornaments, the custodial interrogation of the accused / applicants is not desirable. Parties are known to each others. At the most precautions can be taken. CR.APPLN/5021/2010 (2) 5. In the event of arrest of accused / applicants in Crime No.9 of 2010 registered with Pathardi Police Station, they be released on furnishing PR bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rs.Fifteen Thousand only/-) with one surety of like amount each. The accused / applicants shall not visit Malegaon, Taluka Pathardi, District Ahmednagar till completion of the investigation except being so specifically called by the Investigator in Crime No.9 of 2010. The accused/applicants shall not influence the prosecution witnesses. The accused/applicants shall also coordinate the Investigator if gold ornaments are yet to be recovered. 6. The application is allowed to the above extent. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) ... akl