1 CAW 169 OF 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.169 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST).NO. 24494 OF 2010 Suryakant Mahadev Dange and Ors. ... Applicants/ Appellants Vs. Dada Ganapati Waghmare and Ors. ...Respondents ----- Mr.P.M.Arjunwadkar for Applicants Mr.Prashant Darandal i/b. Mr.Vinod Jadhav for Respondent No.2 ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 3rd May, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants and the Respondent No.2. 2. This is an application for restoration of the Second Appeal which was dismissed for want of prosecution on account of directions given by the Registrar -Judicial for non-removal of the office objections. The only objection raised by the office was that certain pages in the paper- book were not legible and a direction was given by the Registrar -Judicial to replace those pages by providing legible pages. However, a direction was given that this 2 CAW 169 OF 2011 should be done within a period of two weeks, failing which the second appeal shall stand dismissed. 3. It is submitted that caveat was filed on behalf of the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 and he had accordingly, served the compilation on behalf of the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. The vakalatnama, however, has been filed by the Respondent No.2 and is represented by his counsel. 4. In my view, since the notices were issued to the Respondents when the conditional order was passed, it is not necessary to issue fresh notices to the Respondents. The application was also field as soon as the Applicants came to know about the said conditional order. Therefore, the delay of 20 days in filing this application is condoned for the reasons stated in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the application. 5. Civil Application, therefore, is allowed. The order passed by the Registrar-Judicial dated 22nd November, 2010 is recalled. Second Appeal is restored to the file. Office objections to be removed on or before 15th June, 2011. (V.M. KANADE J.)