- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6471 OF 2007 ... Kanwal Jit Singh ...Petitioner v/s. CMD, ONGC & Anr. ...Respondents ... Mr.Saikumar Ramamurthy for the Petitioner. Mr.Prakash Shinde i/b M/s.M.Dhruva & Co. for Respondent No.1. ... CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & V.M.KANADE, JJ. DATED: 30TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C.: Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. There is no dispute that the Petitioner was called for interview. Note 2 below Rule 23 of the Recruitment & - 2 - Promotion Regulations, 1980 reads as under:- For E-5 level and above, the promotions would be on merit only based on performance in interview, depending upon requirement and vacancies. If the Petitioner was called for interview and he has not been selected for the post of General Manager, then obviously in the interview he did not perform well. So far as quantification scheme is concerned, that scheme appears to be for working out the zone of consideration to decide who are the persons who are entitled to be called for interview. From amongst those persons not less than twice the number of vacancies that are to be filled in are to be called for interview and then the selection is to be made only on the basis of performance in the interview. 2. There is not a single allegation of bias made against the Selection Committee. In our opinion, therefore, exception cannot be taken to the selection made by the committee. There is no substance in the petition. It is rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) - 3 - (V.M.KANADE, J.)