•hbt.ji^p tbyBiBsK b-»r> KbK taii 61 filb ^PIP Jsh - i^>biis> ('it •&) 'jtS - i&i^j '^lifehjlp JBKJ liabj (e) (•it-a) >RM> 'isibi.ifch '^hif> ^ fidijue ^. 'hisiu(aila-f> Mfeiy ^ 't'MMt (Z) (•If^) >RM> 'bbh •fih-'^'^ 'ltlbhj Ifeiy l^. 'bii|F> &?K : iaa 'w^lli: °>kf>^Li<a (i) hktbbblbto s.& y ('it'e) 'jti - i^ 'i'^f' - &B>M*b| '(i^la 'i^^is -fiiK - i^^ - itaa 'l^ti 'IEIK Al(jb3Ul ^Ei '+Plh Ulali 't^^ Mtfcbte ^ telt^ue •^ifc Sfr fite '(j^i»^ -ille-A : t'lhf' -h-^le ~^lZh^C<')d^ (-Jt"&) >Kbl> 'h><bh|IP <byBIB:|< b^ft B:^K lyah b|^HI> (iiltft LXI-HC-22 '3'^ "i<WW*l, »fl1^'is, facii'yy 3^ \ov \^' f .\0' .\^ twicfr <niii»i 3TT^T X|?ra? ^,^[S,j^.^^ 200 I^^T' 3lA?I'^l h-fl'h an^l ?o*iicti •ytia aii^r ^<iiwgf?<i chi<ii<n<i1i +ii+ifif'^ Tst<n "<f^^l< ^T 3lfitfT 311^1 SB ; Hon'ble ShnManlndra htohan Shrivastava, J 13-01-2010 Shri-S.K.,Thomas, counselforth' Shri Ajit Singh, P.L for the Heard. This petition was filed by the p| non-promotion to the post of Leoturer.l also seniority and other consequential Leamed State counsel submitsl petition, the petitioner has been promi] dated 31-07-2006. Learned counsel for the been promoted to the post of LeoturerJ as juniore were promoted and other gwen to him. Learned State counsel submiy competent authority for redressal of eonsidered and decided in accordancel Taking into consideration the petitioner has been promoted duringl opinion, interest of justtee would be 4' consider the claim of the petitioner for| all other consequential benefits, pay, p( Accordingly, the instant petition) respondent No. 1 to consider the clairrj petitioner. Statefrespondents. jetitioner aggrieved on aooount of his The petitioner claimed promotion as ^enefrts. that during the pendency the instant |>ted to the post 6f Leoturer vide order petitictier submits that though he has now consequently, seniority from due date ;onsequential benefits have not been that if the petitioner approaohes the refnaining grievanoes, the same shall be Iwith law. SL|bmission made by the parties that the the pendency of the petition, in my irved in directing the respondents to Igrant of promotion from due date with 'rks and seniority. Istands disposed of with a direction to of the petitioner for grant of promotion [•'^S^W 1'u. ..^iSfi';^. ^"^""'^ /'^"^ .XI-HC-22 1 '"w^^/ .-^' "3'^ -'lltllcl'4, ^•dltill<»,f«(cll'M1< 3ff^?r 'tra^? v>s.;l.(±).^:.^ILt^ k? 11H<tl th11<»> 200 lc|'b<{ff' 311^1'^il Vw* sv^y 5»)+iico ^Isa Tumane from due date as also his claim for and consequent seniority. If the peti competent authority within a period o1 No.1 shali considerthe same andtaki a period of three months from the Needless to emphasize, ifthe petitioni to approach this Court. pjayment of other oonsequential benefits ^ioner makes representation before the one month from today, the respondent «kdecisun in accordance with law within |date of receipt of the representation. ^r is still aggrieved, he shatl be at tiberty ctit<il<n'41i HH?i?T?lssil ^•(^K irsiSOT sil^i Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge