IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAT’I‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (S) No. “6&4? / 2010 PETITIONER : Vanish Chandra Dubey, S/o Late Dr.P.C.Dubey, 32 yrs, Asst. Revenue Inspector, Municipal Corporation, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar—(C.G.) ‘/x VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Urban Administration Department, Mantralaya, Raipur—(C.G.) 2) The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 1) WRIT PETITION UIA 226 8L 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 "run nmtm n A no nn‘ n‘uDnDF’Pm‘TDMn‘D HK‘TH CUE IRT OF CHEATWSGARH A”? Bf} .ASPUR mm“ pETmGN (S? N0" 4777 ofgma ?ETET§ONER : Vanish Chandra. Duhey: §ESPONDENTS : ' .Staie ofChhattisgaxh & Aneiha: VERSUS ‘ ($5 EmT PETITION UEEJDER AKIRCLE 226 & 22'? OF IRE CONSTITUHGN OF ENDEA Mm SE: Hon’bie Shri Satu‘sh K. A nilmtri. . . §3resent Shri Pram}! N. Bhamt: Advocate ibr the yetitioner. Shi‘i P.K.Bi1aém‘i, Pam! Lawyer far tE 9m ASKachhwa—hag Adveca$s for L “REE? {Passed o1: G1“ day 0f Navember, 261 E) 1, Léamed eomlsei apyeariizg .fbr the ygar and threé momhs on account State submiis ma? ihe patitionér J has already cominued at the original plasa ofyostjug for aboui 011a 0f intemn ordér gamed by this {Tom 2303x2019 The Siam mav be gamma gibmy m rm ainfrgriatg ‘ordem keeping 1:11 visw pnbiic Viriiemsi ami a§ini11istraiive exigamy. Sim Bhaéun’ State shail not. mmt Hpoz: comyliancs Qfthe impugrigd (misr {iaiai and 15.G72010 {Alm§mm F/l} in mspsct (31° tbs yeiitiomr. .2, At this siage: Whazl n0 sffaet cotxld be givm to da’igd 1:107:2010 (Armemre P/l) 0:1 accoum of the Lntgrim order daréd 23=§8201Q thus§ it is 110i, negessary to go into iegaiity and vaiidity of the: aEms‘taied imvuggsd ordar‘ 3, in vi©w 0f thca abovg accerdLa-g to leamad aounss} apgaem'ng for yatiftien for adjudicaiion, 0£ NO order asta costs, s *fha petitioner, nothing Survivcs in {his 4: Amordinglg ihé getition stamis di$posgd Amit Sd/- _ ;. Satish K.Agnihqtri ,1 Judge 16 Staiekewondaii No. I. e raspandgm Nu, 2“ fhrthéir submitg Iihat ma the imyugzsd order V