1 /^" ^^--iG^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER 3 T.--'' ^••J-%.-' ^y ^- ..»' ^-" ^' W.P.(S) N0. i/ 3 ^. ^ /2010 A. Laxman S/o late Rainarju, aged about 47 years, Assistant Teacher, posted at Govt. Higher Secondary School, Potanar, Block Tokapal, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) R/o MIG- T-21, Housing Board, Colony, Aghanpur, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS -i rl- SA FL^ ,,^^^5^ -''<'• / ^f : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Collector, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) 4. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) 5. Shri D.K. Hirwani, aged about 52 years, Upper Division Teacher, posted at H.S.S. Bhadisgaon, Tokapal, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) 1 ^- \Qf*M!,P^ ^ <-s f _ ^ '^ ': ; »! s.i^g^a^) $ ;1 ^, . ^^——-^ - f- \f^ /& , <%? ^ / ^ 6. Smt. B.N- Beg, aged about 54 years, Upper Division Teacher, Oma camp, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) ^7. Smt. Meera Hirwani, aged about 45 years, Upper Division Teacher, posted at Higher Secondary School, Sargipal, Jagdalpur, distt. Bastar (C.G.) 8. Smt. Kalpana Ba^khede, aged about 50 years, Upper Division Teacher, H.S.S. School Mavalipadar, Darbha Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) 9. Smt. Neena Suresh, aged about 44 years, Upper Division Teacher posted at Higher Secondary School, Kumharawand, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) 10. Smt. Nirupa Verma, aged about 46 years, Upper Division Teacher, Higher Secondaiy School Kanya, Bastar, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As mentioned in the cause title above. SII^T ^iT ft-li+ OTI SII^t sfflW ;--<' Ni*1WI <*>^|eh ?sr "4i<ii«^, ^Til'M'Ko, 'f^rrey _w;lt£)^,^I^ •^_200 an^T'<ra^ ('y'd'1'^) TRHW ^lf^I 3II^!T SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohah Shrivastava. J. 10-08^010 Shri U. R. Koshaley, counsel! Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawy^ on advance copy. Heard. The petitioner has approachi inactjon on the part of the representation against his superces! id this Court aggrieved on aocount of r^spondents in not consjdering his Case of the petitioner is (Annexure P-1), large number of Upper Division Teacher. iion. Ithat vide order dated 08-10-2008 ^ssistant Teachers were promoted as Submissioh of learned counsl the petitioner, respondents No.5 to| have been promoted on the post o) submitted that there is no adverse i1 punishment imposed against the pe< From the faots pleaded jn thj junior to the petitioner have been pj Teacher. In the absence of thi punishment or pendency of departrtiental requires due and proper conside) oommunioate the petitioner on reprs on what ground, the petitioner has b| «ki-ii(<'i<i1-<"wrcff'? ft'st tRin^re ^TaffiPTSII^I forthepetitioner. for the State/respondents No.1 to 4 ^l for the petitioner is that superceding 110, who are juniors to the petitioner, Upper Division Teacher. It is further ^mark or departmental enquiry or any litioner. petition, it is found that the persons (omoted to the post of Upper Division |re being' any adverse remark or enquiry, claim of the petitioner fation. Respondents are obliged to }sentatjon being made, as to why and ^en superceded and not promoted. --W •^. ,->»"<s^: '.? :- .^--.^ 's^ ^'.iraifi^, ®fll<-i*i<o,fqiniy^< . ^.?. ^)^ ^3^/10 an^l'<RaEr(1 3iI^iqil1^iW | aqisll^l gi*TO; | 1—1 q»i*il<n<fri'E?TO?ff ^ l^sl' <f<i^i< i?3ifim CT^T Tumane Acoordingly, 1 direct respor|dent petitioner's claim for grant of pronjiotion period of three months from the grievance of the petitioner is still uj take recourse to such remedy as date m4y No.4 to consider and decide by a speaking order within a of receipt of a copy of this order. If ^iredressed, he would be at liberty to be available to him under the law. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge