1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.302 OF 2008 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.303 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1537 OF 2008 Sagar Sangeet & Convesant Scheme Coop.Housing Socy. Ltd. and Ors. .. Petitioners Versus Divisional Jt.Registrar, Coop.Societies and Anr. .. Respondents Mrs.Lata Bachani for petitioners Mr.P.B.Anand for applicant Mr.R.R.Bhosale, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 14th July 2008 P.C. . The petitioner had approached this Court by filing Writ Petition No.1537 of 2008 and on 7th July 2008, this Court has disposed of writ 2 petition on the ground that petitioners before this Court have an alternate remedy of approaching the Government by filing a revision application under section 154 of M.C.S.Act, 1960. All that this Court has done is granted time to petitioners to file revision application and until they file the same, it was directed that the Administrator should not take charge. Further, if the revision application is failed, then, the Administrators should not take charge until revision application is heard and disposed of. 2. The petition is not entertained by this Court and rather it is dismissed on the ground of availability of alternate, equally efficacious remedy. Yet, the applicants in the notices of motion are contending that they are the original complainants on whose complaints the order was passed by the Dy.Registrar. They had filed caveats in this Court so also vakalatnama but no 3 notice was given to them before the writ petition was moved. 3. After each of these applications are heard at some length, I am of the view that the notices of motion need not be entertained as the main petition itself is disposed of. Therefore, it is directed that if the revision application is filed, the authority to endeavour and dispose of the same within a period of three months from the date of its filing. For a period of three months, the Administrator will not take charge but the Management shall only be permitted to carry on day to day affairs means they should not take any major policy decisions until their revision applications are heard and disposed of. Equally, the applicants are at liberty to move the revisional authority and seek its permission for intervention. With this clarification, the notices of motion are disposed of. 4 (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)