'^ ^ RESPONDEN'IS HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 6156 of2007 Yugal Kumar Mishra s/o Late Shri Dhwaja Prasad Mishara, aged about 43 years Cooperati.ve Extension Officer, Block Gurur, District Durg(CG) R/o Dixit Niwas, in front of Bharti Niwas, Haauniaa Nagar, Durg, District Durg(CG) Versus 1 State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Departnient of Cooperation, D.K.S. Bhavan. Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Raipur(CG) 3 Additional Registiar, Cooperati.ve Societies, Raipur(CG) 4 Joiiit Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Durg(CG) 5 Assistaat Registrar, Cooperati.ve Societies(Audit) Durg(CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Shri C.R.Sahu, couasel for fhe petitioner. Shri Sumit Verma, Panel for ftie State on advauce copy. OR&L ORDER (17.10.2007) SUNIL KUMARSINHA. J. Heard on aduiission. The petitioner, who is workiag on the post of Auditor, has been transferred froni Durg to GuAr, Durg. Leamed counsel for the petitioner argues that fhe petitioner is a haadicapped person and he has been traasferred to a distaace ofabout 70 kia. He further argues fhat by order dated 30.6.2006, on his own appUcation, he was brciught irom Rajnandgaon to Durg W.P. No. (S) 6156 of2007 aad just after one year, he has been traasferred froai Duig to anofher place. I have considered the point raised by tearaed couasel for ffae petitioner. These are n.0t the grounds for interfering with fhe order of traasfer by a Court of law. Learaed counsel for fhe petitioner could not poiat out any groimd of malafide or of extraaeous consideration or ofviolation ofaay statutoiy Rule or the Act. Transfer is an iucidence of service. No person working on a transferable post can claim to be posted at a particular place. It is for the eiuployer to see that who should be posted where ia the iaterest of better fi.mctiorring of the department as also ia the public interest. It is fhe settled view ofthe Apex Coiirt that zmless fhe order of transfer is vitiated by inalafide or extraaeous coasiderations or is agamst aay statutory Rule or Act, it caanot be interfered by a Court of Law. The petition has no merits. The same is disruissed at the motion stage itself. However, lookiag to the physical condition of the petitioner, he shall be free to file a represeiiitation before fhe coacemed authority, which shaU be decided by fhe said aufhorily accordaace with law. ^a^^ s»5 se sunita