S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 84/2007. Dr. C.B. Mathur & Ors. V/s. Chetan Raj @ Chetan Kumar @ Chetan Prakash & Ors. 1 S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 84/2007. Dr. C.B. Mathur & Ors. V/s. Chetan Raj @ Chetan Kumar @ Chetan Prakash & Ors. Date of Order: 13th May, 2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr. M.M. Ranjan, for the petitioners. Mr. Hari Bareth, for the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This revision petition has been filed against the order dated 1.3.2007 passed on the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC by the defendant petitioner which was rejected by the learned trial court by the aforesaid order. Several objections have been raised in the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, however I find that so far as the objections which have been raised in the said application are concerned prima facie they do not fall within any of the clauses under Rule 11 of Order 7 CPC. S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 84/2007. Dr. C.B. Mathur & Ors. V/s. Chetan Raj @ Chetan Kumar @ Chetan Prakash & Ors. 2 The grievance which has been raised in the application is based upon the material which the defendants seeks to rely upon and not based upon the plaint averments alone. In the facts and circumstances, therefore, the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC based upon the material on which the defendant petitioner seeks to rely upon as mentioned in the application cannot be the ground for rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC as it is settled law that so far as an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC is concerned the court is required to consider only the plaint averments and not any material or evidence which the defendant seeks to rely upon.. In the facts and circumstances, therefore, I find no good ground to interfere with the impugned order dated 1.3.2007. It may also be noted here that since the filing of the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC the defendant petitioner has already submitted their written statement and the trial of the suit has S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 84/2007. Dr. C.B. Mathur & Ors. V/s. Chetan Raj @ Chetan Kumar @ Chetan Prakash & Ors. 3 progressed after the framing of the issues. In the facts and circumstances, therefore, I find no good ground to interfere in the revisional jurisdiction. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed summarily. No order as to costs. (Dalip Singh),J. Tanwar/- Jr.P.A.