IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2011 / 21ST CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 11823 of 2011(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ELDHO VARGHESE, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.VARGHESE, THOZHUTUNGAPARAMBIL, MORKALA KARA, KUNNATHUNADU VILLAGE, PERUMBAVOOR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.O.MUHAMED SHEMEEM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANADU, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682030. 2. THE THAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682011. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, KUNNATHUNADU VILLAGE, MORAKKALA KARA, ERNAKULAM-682011. GP SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ....................... W.P.(C).11823/2011 ....................... Dated this the 11th day of April, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:- (i). To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs, order or directions commanding the 2nd and 3rd respondents to complete the procedure in respect of transfer of registry covered by Exts.P1 as per Ext.P3 and 4 in accordance with law within one month. (ii). To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs, order or directions commanding the respondents to take appropriate legal action on Exts.P3 and 4 and necessary direction may give to complete the mutation in respect of property covered by Exts.P1 in accordance with law. (iii). To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding respondent No.1 to enquire into the matter in W.P.(C).11823/11 2 respect of non completion of the procedure of transfer of Registry covered by Exts.P1 and take appropriate disciplinary action or appropriate legal action against the respondent No.2 and 3 for their illegal act and abuse of official power in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is given to the second respondent to consider Ext.P4 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4. In view of the limited nature of relief sought for, this Court finds that it is not necessary to go into the merits of the case. Second respondent is therefore, directed to consider Ext.P4 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. W.P.(C).11823/11 3 5. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, Judge mrcs