@ SINGLE BENCH IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR wRrr pETrrION (S) No. 60 W’ / 2011 x PETITIONER (W: Shivnandan Saket, S/o. Shri ~ I Mallu Saket, aged about 48 years, / ‘a \%>3;§§%“ R/o. Baramkela, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through: - Secretary, Revenué and Disaster Management Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Revenue Department, Rajpur (C.G.) 37/ Commissioner Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. /Collector, Land Record, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA L13 HIGH C01 IRT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BU .ASPI JR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5082 of2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICI ,F‘, 226 OF THE CONSTITI JTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. AgnihotriLJ. Present: Shri Saurahh Dangii Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Moorlhy, Deputy Advocate Ganeral for the State/respondents. Shri S.P. Navratna, Dy. Conmu's5ioner (R), Bilaspur, is prcsenl. ORDER gORAL! * (Passed on 06 day of September, 201 1) . i At the very outset, Shri Moorthy, learned counsel appearing for the Sims/respondents, on instructions, submits that the order dated 12.08.2011 (Amxexure P/l) impugxed herein, has not been passed by a competent. authority in accordance with Rule 20, Part. H, of the Madhya, Pradesh/Chhattisgarh Land Record Manual, thus, the same is umustainable in law and shall not be g'ven effect to. In View of the above submission made by leamed State counsel, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing smvives for adjudication at this stage. Accordingly, the impugted order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexure P/l) is quashed. However, liberty is reserved to the State/respondents to pass appropriate order; if so advised, in accordance with law, in administrative exigency and in public interest. The writ . petition . . 1s . allowed. No order asto costs.”//: M- Shivnandan Saket. VERSI IS RESPGNDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh 8c