HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.R.P. No.2439 of 2009 Date: 28.8.2009 Between: Sahibzadi Khusro Jahan Farhat, W/o. Malik Sikander Shaheen, Hyderabad. Through G.P.A. Mohd. Namath Khan alias Asjfaq, S/o. Late Khaja Moinuddin Khan, Hyderabad. … Petitioner And K. Kondala Rao, S/o. Late K. Narayana Rao, Ranga Reddy District. … Respondent THE HONOURABLE Smt. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.R.P. No. 2439 of 2009 ORDER: This revision petition is directed against the order of the learned II Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in I.A. No.1313 of 2008 in O.S. No.2170 of 2006, dated 2.1.2009, whereby and whereunder the learned Senior Civil Judge dismissed the I.A. filed by the petitioner. The petitioner is the plaintiff and the respondent is the defendant. The petitioner filed the aforementioned suit in O.S. No.2170 of 2006 for declaration of title, possession and injunction. In that suit, she filed the aforementioned I.A. No.1313 of 2008 under Order XXVI rule 9 of C.P.C. to appoint an advocate commissioner for making local inspection and to note down the physical features and the nature of constructions that are being made in the plaint A&B schedule properties. The Court below by the order impugned in this revision, dismissed the said I.A. Hence, the present revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order. Admittedly, the petitioner filed the suit for declaration of title and possession. The said suit was coming up for trial and at that stage, the petitioner filed the present I.A. seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner on the ground that the respondent having occupied some rooms in the suit schedule property is undertaking certain constructions and improvements thereon. The petitioner except alleging that the respondent is undertaking certain illegal constructions in the suit schedule property, did not file any material to substantiate the said contention, in the absence of which, the Court below has rightly dismissed the I.A. I, therefore, do not find any illegality or irregularity in the order under revision. The revision petition fails and it is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ____________________ T. MEENA KUMARI,J Date: 28th August, 2009 pnb