HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.18398 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.11.2011 **** Banita Dagar . . . . Petitioner VS. MD University, Rohtak & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. RS Malik, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for respondent Nos.1&2 Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for respondent No.3 ***** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner was admitted in B.Sc. three-year Degree Course in GVM College, Sonepat in the year 2009 and cleared her B.Sc. 1st year examination in May, 2010. Thereafter she appeared in B.Sc. 2nd year examination which too is said to have been cleared this year. The petitioner’s admission has now been cancelled by the University on the plea that she was not possessing the requisite qualification of 10+2 at the time when she was admitted in B.Sc. Degree course. (2). During the course of hearing, it is not in dispute that the petitioner has qualified the 10+2 examination though may CWP No.18398 of 2011.doc - 2 – be after cut-off date of her admission in B.Sc. Degree Course. (3). Having heard learned counsel for the parties, suffice it to observe that it is too late for the University to cancel the petitioner’s admission at this stage when she has already passed the 1st and 2nd years of B.Sc. three year Degree Course. The condition of passing 10+2 before the petitioner’s admission in B.Sc. 1st year, though may be mandatory in the given facts and circumstances, shall be deemed to have been relaxed. (4). The writ petition is accordingly allowed and the petitioner’s admission is directed to be regularized. (5). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 21.11.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge