WP(C) 1467/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr. A Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. R Chakravorty, learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate, Assam appearing for the S tate of Assam. The petitioner is an aspirant for the post of Anganwadi Worker. In respo nse to the advertisement dated 16.12.2009 she had offered her candidature for th e post of Anganwadi Worker in No. 91 Paschim Jorsimalu Anganwadi Centre under Go raimari Integrated Child Development Scheme Project. The petitioner’s grievance is that the Private Respondent i.e. Responden t No. 5 applied for the post of Anganwadi Worker from two different Anganwadi Ce ntres i.e. No. 91 Paschim Jorsimalu and No. 92 Madhya Jorsimalu Anganwadi Centre which is not permissible as per Clause 17 of the advertisement and therefore, s he ought not to have been invited for the selection. However, the same is a disp uted question of fact. For conducting the selection, it is expected that the aut hority ought to have adhered to the Rules and Regulations holding the field. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of providing that t he respondents shall finalise the matter relating to the selection taking into a ccount the relevant guidelines etc. It is made clear that no adverse orders shal l be passed against the Respondent No. 5 without giving an opportunity of being heard.