IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2011 / 1ST POUSHA 1933 RP.No. 888 of 2011() ---------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 26607/2011 (A) DATED 15.11.2011. ................................................................. REVIEW PETITIONER(S) / PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION : ----------------------------------------------------- DEEPU M.R. PUTHRAVILA, KIZHAKKEKARA VEEDU, THEMBAMUTTAM, RUSSELPURAM P.O. , ATHIYANNUR VILLAGE, NEYYATINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST. BY ADVS. SRI. GOPAKUMAR R.THALIYAL SRI. V. ANIRUDHAN NAIR SRI. A. CHANDRA BABU RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT(S) : ----------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANTHAPURAM - 695 001 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANTHAPURAM - 695 005 3. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICE, THIRUVANTHAPURAM - 695 001 4. THE TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER, TALUK SUPPLY OFFICE, NEYYATINKARA - 695 121 5. SHEEJA VIJAYAKUMAR, W/O VIJAYAKUMAR, SUKUMARI MANDIRAM, BALARAMAPURAM, ALSO HAVING RESIDING AT POOJALAKSHMI, ALUVILA, BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 501. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. MOHAMMED SHAH . R5 BY ADV. SRI. M. SREEKUMAR. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: NS RP.No. 888 /2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) ANNEXURES : ANNEXURE I : COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 03.10.2011. RESPONDENT(S) ANNEXURES : NIL / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE NS ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` R.P. No. 888 of 2011 in W.P.(C) No. 26607 of 2011 A ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2011 O R D E R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W.P.(C) No.26607/2011 filed by the review petitioner was disposed of by judgment dated 15.11.2011, accepting the submission of the learned Government Pleader that Exts.P4 and P5 were not implemented on account of an order of stay passed by the District Collector on 03.10.2011. In this Review Petition, what is urged is that there is no such order and that the judgment is therefore vitiated for error apparent on the face of the records. 2. On the filing of the Review Petition, learned Government Pleader obtained further instructions and it is now submitted that there is no order of stay as such. However, further proceedings pursuant to Exts.P4 and P5 are kept in abeyance on account of the pendency of the appeal and that too on the basis of an order dated RP No.888/2011 : 2 : 03.10.2011 passed by the District Supply Officer. In spite of opportunities given, counsel for the fifth respondent has not so far produced any order of stay also. 3. In such circumstances, I am satisfied that the judgment is vitiated on account of error apparent on the face of the records and, therefore, it is reviewed and recalled. Post the writ petition for admission after X'mas holidays. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) // True Copy // P.A. To Judge aks/22/12