IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M 36906 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.01.2011 Surender Kumar Yadav ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. K.S. Nalwa, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) This is a petition seeking regular bail in FIR No.163 dated 12.6.2010 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 149, 323, 447, 448, 506 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station DLF Phase-II, Gurgaon. Petitioner is said to have grabbed the property of the complainant by way of playing fraud, forgery with the help of Dinesh Yadav. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that petitioner has purchased the property from Dinesh Yadav without knowing that ownership of the property is of complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that coming to know that Dinesh Yadav has wrongly sold the property of the complainant, petitioner has compromised the civil suit pending between the complainant and the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that there is no likelihood of tampering with the evidence since registered sale deed is already there. It is further stated that petitioner is in judicial custody w.e.f. 15.11.2010. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, on instructions of Jagdev Singh, ASI, has argued that present case is of the land grabbing and petitioner should not be released on bail. Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. Let petitioner be released on bail on furnishing of his personal bond and sureties to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurgaon. (Alok Singh) Judge January 05, 2011 R.S.