^< Petitioner HI^' COURT <y OlHAmsa^H AT BILASRJR W.P.fS) No. 1959 of 2007 Single BenchsHatbte Shri Satish K. Agnlhotri. J. Smt. Sugrim Wife of Shri Siivlal, aged about 20 yeors Caste RaJNrcr (O.B.C.), Resident of Vilicge Budar pateipara), Janpad Panchoyot Sohat, Tdisil Sonkwt, t)istrict Koriya (C.©.5 Resoondents Versus 1. State of ChhaH'isgu'h, Through the Secretory, E)ept»-tmentof Women and Child Development, &. K. 5. &iawan Raipur (C.6.) 2. The Coltector, Balkunthpur, &istrict Koriya (C.fi.) 3. The Women and Child Devebpment Officer, Baikunthpur, &istrict Koriya (c.e.) 4. "Rie Project Officer, Women and Chikl Oevelopment Project, Sonhat, Distriet Koriya (C.6.) 5. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpod Panchoiyat Sonhat, Oistrict Koriya (C.©.) 6. Smt. Chandrowati Wife of Shri Shivshankar. <ged about 22 years, Resident of Village Budo' (Khalpim), Tahsil Sonhat, District Koriya (C.©.) Present; Mr. .Ashok Kumor Shukla, counset for the petitioner'. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawiyer for the State/respondents No. 1 to 4. OftbER (Passed on 2"<! &ay of April, 2007) 1. Lewned counsel appearirg for the petitioner submits that the appointment of respondent No. 6 as i^anganbadi Worker is contrary to the provisions of Aanganbadi Scheme. The petitioner has preferentia! right of appointment ^ Subhssh ove" the respondent No. 6 on the ground that the petitioner Sives below the poverty !ine and the sister-in-Saw of the respondent No. 6 is also an elected Panch. 2. Be that as it may^ the Collector, Itoriya is directed to look into the ailegations made by the petitioner and pass appropriate order after affording opportunity of heoring to the parties in accordance with !aw and css per Acnganbadi Scheme, within a period of four weeks from the date of ,-eceipt of this order. 3. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 4. Consequently, l.A. No. 1, an applicsrtion for grant of ad-interim reSief. sfands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge r