1 SSK/21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3101 OF 2009 Mrs. Sheela Nitin Pawar ....Petitioner Versus The Commissioner of Police for Greater Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. M. K. Kocharekar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. S. D. Shinde, APP. CORAM : D. B. BHOSALE & R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED : 20th APRIL, 2010. P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the respondents. 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking directions to Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to explain as to what steps they have taken in respect of the representation dated 27th October, 2009 made by the petitioner regarding alleged illegal detention of her husband. She has also prayed for appropriate action against the respondents for alleged illegal detention. The State has filed reply affidavit dated 14th December, 2009 2 and in paragraph no.36 thereof, it is stated that the Designated Court has already taken cognizance of the allegations made by the petitioner and making an enquiry in respect thereof. The Designated Court has called for the report from the Investigating Officer vide order dated 22nd December, 2009. From the averments in paragraph no.36, it appears that the petitioner has made the application before the Designated Court making similar allegations and prayers, as made in the present writ petition, and the said Court has taken cognizance and making inquiry into the allegations. In view thereof, we do not find any reason to entertain this writ petition and dispose it of with directions to the Designated Court to pass appropriate order on the application filed by the petitioner making the allegations, as made in the present writ petition, expeditously. (R. V. MORE, J.) (D. B. BHOSALE, J.)