THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD Taken up Writ Petition No.25547 of 2006 Date: 02-01-2007 Between: D. Tejasree, Junior Intermediate(M.P.C.), Roll No.8, K.P.R. & J.L. Siddhartha College, Eluru, West Godavari District. … Petitioner/s And The Inspector of Police, Eluru Town, Eluru, West Godavari District and others. … Respondent/s THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD Taken Up Writ Petition No.25547 of 2006 ORAL ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Bhavani Prasad) Heard the learned Government Pleader for Home, representing the learned Advocate General, appearing for the respondents. 2. On the complaint through letter, dated 24-10-2006, by Kum. D.Tejasri, Junior Intermediate, K.P.R. & J.L. Siddhartha College, Eluru, to the Hon'ble the Chief Justice, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, the matter was enquired into by the District Judge, West Godavari District at Eluru, as to the truth or otherwise of the allegations, on the directions of the Hon'ble Chief Justice, and on receipt of the report from the Principal District and Sessions Judge, West Godavari District, who opined the allegations to be true, the matter was treated as taken up writ petition. 3. The Inspector of Police, Eluru Town, Eluru, in his affidavit explains that on receipt of the communication of taking up of this writ petition, he conducted personal enquiries and came to know that the petitioner is a student of K.P.R. & J.L. Siddhartha College at Santhinagar, Eluru, and residing in the Hostel run by the management of the said College. He stated that the petitioner never complained to the management or the police about the threats through calls or by any of the relations. However, the Inspector of Police, still advised the College authorities not to allow any person other than the parents of the petitioner to contact in future and also received a letter from the management of the College that they would prevent the outsiders from contacting the petitioner. The Inspector of Police further stated that differences between the parents of the petitioner already led to filing of O.P.No.104 of 2006 before the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Kovvuru, for divorce, at the instance of the petitioner’s father and the Inspector of Police has also examined the petitioner’s mother and grand-parents, who denied any threats from them either to the petitioner or her brother and sister. The Inspector of Police assured this Court that the police are always ready and willing to give police protection as and when required by the petitioner and that in view of the age, education and future of the petitioner, adequate protection, whenever necessary, will be provided to the petitioner. 4. In the light of the above facts and circumstances, we are of the considered opinion that it is no longer necessary to keep the writ petition pending any further and suffice to give appropriate directions to the police concerned in terms of their positive response already expressed in the affidavit of the Inspector of Police, Eluru Town, Eluru. 5. The undertaking given by the Inspector of Police, Eluru Town, Eluru, about providing of adequate and necessary police protection to the petitioner, whenever required, is recorded. Therefore, the Inspector of Police, Eluru Town, Eluru, is directed to provide adequate and necessary police protection to the petitioner whenever required and whenever she approaches the police to save her from any possible harassment from any of the relatives, as alleged by her in the complaint. 6. With the above directions, the writ petition is closed, at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA ______________________________ JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD 02-01-2007. Msr. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD Taken Up Writ Petition No.25547 of 2006 02-01-2007 (Msr)