THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.22227 of 2006 ORDER: The petitioner claims to have purchased a plot of 283 square yards in survey No.240 of Enumamula Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District, through a sale deed, dated 17.07.2006. Her vendor Sri G.Dayakar Rao, is said to have obtained a decree for perpetual injunction, against the 1st respondent and the Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceilings, Warangal, by filing O.S.No.57 of 1987 in the Court of II Additional District Munsif, Warangal and that the decree was affirmed in A.S.No.27 of 1997 in the Court of I Additional District Judge, Warangal. The petitioner submitted an application to the Gram Panchayat, Enumamula, the 2nd respondent herein, with a request to grant permission for construction of R.C.C. building. On the basis of a resolution said to have been passed on 19.08.2006, the Sarpanch addressed a letter, dated 11.10.2006, to the 1st respondent, for necessary action. Treating the letter, dated 11.10.2006, as permission, the petitioner started the construction. The 1st respondent issued a notice, dated 04.10.2006, requiring the petitioner to stop the construction, on the ground that the plot of the petitioner is not the subject matter of any sanctioned layout. The petitioner submitted her explanation on 12.10.2006. It is stated that without even passing any order, the 1st respondent has demolished the construction. Hence, this Writ Petition. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. The petitioner reeled under the impression that permission was accorded by the 2nd respondent to make construction vide proceedings, dated 11.10.2006. However, a perusal thereof discloses that, it is nothing but a letter addressed to the 1st respondent for necessary action. The petitioner ought not to have started the construction without receiving any permission, or communication from the 1st respondent. The 1st respondent is said to have already removed the structure that was raised by the petitioner. Even at this stage, the 1st respondent can be required to take necessary steps on the basis of the letter, dated 11.10.2006, addressed to it, by the 2nd respondent and the explanation submitted by the petitioner in response to a show cause notice, dated 04.10.2006. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing that the 1st respondent shall pass appropriate orders on the letter, dated 11.10.2006, addressed to it by the 2nd respondent and the explanation submitted by the petitioner on 12.10.2006, to the show cause notice, dated 04.10.2006, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In case any further information is needed, the 1st respondent shall address necessary communication to the petitioner. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.02.06.2010. GJ