1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5731 OF 2009 Smita W/o.Pramod Patil PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and another RESPONDENTS Mr.Surekha Mahajan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr.V.H.Dighe, learned AGP for respondent no.1. Mr.A.B.Girase, learned counsel for respondent no.2. (CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.) DATE : 29/08/2009 PER COURT : 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of The Constitution of India by which the petitioner prays for quashing and setting aside the inquiry report dated 30/05/2009. It appears that subsequently Shri.Girase learned counsel for the University respondent no.2 states that pursuant to the aforesaid report, the respondents have issued an order on 27/08/2009 dismissing the petitioner from service. In the light of subsequent events, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail such remedies as are available to the petitioner in Law of challenging the subsequent order dated 27/08/2009. We accordingly permit the petitioner to 2 withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. Since we have not adjudicate on any of the issues raised in this petition, aforesaid issues are open for consideration if raised before the appropriate authorities. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.) khs/AUGUST 2009/wp5731-09 3