@ <é§7 Emgie $s§mh IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION C ' NO. (41% OF 2009 / Neelesh Kumar Bhagoria, S/o Shri Ramesh Kumar Bhagoria, aged about 36 years, resident of C/o Shri R. K. Bhagoria, Vinoba Nagar, R—8 Lane, State Bank Colony, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. /State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Scheduled Caste/Scheduled , 3. Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) .4. Engineers India Limited, (a Government of India Undertaking), having its registered office at Engineers lndia Bhawan,1, Bhikaji Kama Road, NewDelhi WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS: The petitioner, above-named, most respectfully submits as under: o/f Tribes Welfare,Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhavan Raipur (Chhattisgarh) \9’k _ W" @Q’g-wyguavn 2. fa Jati Praman Patra Uchha V‘a Stariya Chhanbin Samiti, ? In the O/o Commissioner, Scheduled Caste/Schedwed Tribes Development, Pt. Ravi Shankar Shukla Vishwa Vidyalaya Parisar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Through its Secretary. '» HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION LC} No. 4176 0f2009 Neelesh Kumar Bhagoria. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh & Others. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF WDIA SBN : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. A nihotri J. Present: Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. duri, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents lto3. ORDER ORAL' (Passed on 27 day of September, 2010) and spirit, While considering the case of the petitioner for verification ofhis social status certificate. ’(1994) 6 scc 241 \ 2 (1995) 4 scc 32 (3a _ a i) g 'r’ . At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly and fairly submit that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Dinesh Kumar Bhagaria v. Stare of Chhattz'sgarh & 0thers3 and other connected matters, wherein this Court after considering all the aspects of the matter and after considering the law laid down by the Supreme Court in umpteen number of cases, in para 26 of the judgment and order, has made certain clarifications for verification of the caste certificate. 4. In View offoregoing, the impugned order dated 08.01 .2007 (Annexure P/l) is quashed. The Committee is directed to proceed in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Madhuri Patil (supra) & Lavetz' Giri (supra) and further explained by this Court in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria (supra) and other connected matters, as early as possible. 5. In the result, the writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated above. No order asto costs. I i l t . Sd/_ . Satish K. Agnihotri’l ' Judge tJ't. 3 WP (S) No.3338 of 2007 decided on 19-8-2010