IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4586 of 2010 AKHILESH YADAV @ PACHUS GRAM, SON OF SADHU SHARAN RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-TEKA BIGHA, P.S. BAKHTIARPUR, DISTRICT-PATNA. …………………………………………………..PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ------------ 3. 29.3.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 395/397 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. It has also been submitted that though the petitioner is in custody since 11.2.2009, he has not been put to any T.I. Parade. It is also contended that there is no recovery of any incriminating articles from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the self incriminating confessional statement of the co- accused, Guddu Yadav alias Ram Jaypal Yadav, who has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide - 2 - order dated 27.8.2007 passed in Criminal Misc. No.36903 of 2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner produces the certified copy of the aforesaid order. Let it be kept on record. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Akhilesh Yadav alias Pachus Gram, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-III, Barh, District-Patna, in connection with Rail Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No.55/05 in Sessions Trial No.2392/08, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, after his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)