1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 3932/2007 (Mst. Aijen & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 21/08/2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Sandeep Mehta for the petitioners. Mr. V.R.Mehta, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and challan papers. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the allegation of causing injuries is not against the present petitioners. The present petitioners are ladies and in the first set of occurrence they were not shown participant in the commission of crime. However, at the subsequent stage, it has been stated that thereafter the present petitioners and the other co-accused ladies came and they also inflicted injuries in the abdomen and ribs. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no such injuries have been suffered by deceased Sojiram as alleged against the present petitioners. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that in the first set of occurrence, the petitioners were not present, however, subsequently, it is alleged that they also joined and inflicted injuries but the injuries suffered by the deceased do not corroborate with the injuries alleged against the present petitioner, having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it 2 just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Mst. Aijen W/o Bhoma and Mst. Teji W/o Raju be released on bail in FIR No. 47/07 P.S. Shahpura, district Bhilwara provided each of them executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP