C--F ^^r€] L- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OJ'^HHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (Sl NoMV7( /2011 PETITIONERS .^i .~>Y^^ ^ '.•^?'\1'"' .^^xy" ^...•••^(v ^r'/y^ ^' ^°'^? ts"^'' ^' .; ^ / 1. Akatram Sinha S/o Ram Lal Sinha aged about 52 Years, presently working as Head /> Master at Govt. Primary School Tikaripara (Malhar), Block - Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) ^ 2. Radhehari Nirmalkar S/o Faguaram Nirmalkar aged about 53 Years, presently working as Upper Division Teacher at Govt. Middle School Pendri, Block - Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) ^3. Ganesh Ram Khandekar S/o Sammelal Khandekar aged about 54 Years, presently working as Head Master at Govt. Primary School Sothi, Block - Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) -" 4. Rathram Chouhan S/o Suritram Chouhan aged about 54 Years, presently working as Head Master at Govt. Middle School Khamhariya, Block - Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) " VERSUS RESPONDENTS: /' ^o 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, -L^i^) Block Masturi District Bilaspur (C.G.) / 4. Joint Director, Treasury,accounts, pension, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA g^a^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON'BLB SHRJ JU8TICE PRITINKBR DIWAKBR PETITIONBR RBSPONDENTS W.P.tSI N0. 417l/^[)l1 Akatram SmJia & Ofhers Versus State ofC.G. & Others WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION 01* INDIA Aopeara»ce: Shri Ashwiai Shukla^ coimsel for the petitioners. Shri N.Naha Roy, P.L. for the State. ORjy-ORDBR (01.08.2011$ With tb.e consent ofthe parties, the matt.er is heari. finally, The petitioners were isiitiaUy appoiated a.s Assistant, Teacher on a feed pay ofRs. 150. After completion offheir proba.tion period, fhey were granted regular pay scale ofRs. 169-300. Learaed counsel for the petitioner subxnits ffaat the above issue has beea considered by the M,P, State Adixiiaistrative Tribunaly Jabalpiir m O.A. JVo* 2745/89 between MaAhukewt YetAu <md 56 ofhcrsr Ws. .SMtcrte ofM.P* <md others, wherein it was held that the sim.ilarly sitaated teachers are entitled to regular pay scsle with effect froin the date of irjiitial appointment. The inatter was taken up to the HonT^le Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by fhe Hoalble Supreme Court upholdmg the decision of fhe Tribunal to tfae effect that tlie Teachers/Assistaat Teachers are entifled to regiilar pay scale froni the date of initial appointment, It is further subniitted that fhis Court while considermg fhe same issue in W.P» (S) N^ 472S/2006 between Amwr Sect Remi & Others Vs. Stctte 0f ChhoSMsgesrh cmd Ofthers by order dated 01.09.06 allowed the petitioners to make a representation witMa a period often days, raism.g all fh-e grievaxices. .^^-^ :.:^" ......^" ^—^:e^. X. ^ Accordmgly the petitloners are granted liberly to make a representation raising aB their grievmices ia the Ughit of the afaresaid judgment and fhe circular dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P/2), aad m tam fhe concemed respondent is directed to decide the representation, if aay, ia accordaxice wifh law, on its owii meiits^ withio. a period of eight weeks froxn fhe date of receipt of the representation subject to verification ofthe facte. In view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of No order as to costs. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge