IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2010 / 24TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 15647 of 2010(E) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SURESH.K.A., AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.KUTTIMAN, ELAMBILATHODI HOUSE, VALLATHOL NAGAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH VETTIKKATTIRI DESOM, VETTIKKATTIRI POST, THALAPPALLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.MUHAMMED SALAHUDHEEN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, KOZHIKODE. 2. THE REGIOAL DIRECTOR, E.S.I.CORPORATION, SWARAJ ROUND, THIRSSUR. R1 R2 BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL,SC, P.F. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J --------------------------- W.P(C) No.15647 of 2010-E ---------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of July, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is an employee of the Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation and is presently working in the Non- Vegetarian Refreshment Room of Shornur Railway Station. His actual name is 'Suresh K.A' as shown in the voter's identity card, first page of the S.S.L.C Book etc. But in the employment records, including ESI/EPF records, the name of the petitioner happened to be shown as 'Unnikrishnan', which according to the petitioner is his 'pet name'. This error is sought to be corrected by filing Exts.P3 and P4 representations, which have not invited any positive result, making the petitioner to approach this Court for appropriate reliefs. 2. The learned standing counsel for the respondents submits that, a counter affidavit has already been filed by the first respondent producing Ext.R1(a) letter dated 2.6.2010, whereby the petitioner has been instructed to produce certain records, with necessary recommendation by the employer, so as to have it forwarded to the concerned authorities. W.P(C) No.15647 of 2010-E 2 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner is ready and willing to satisfy the requirement as specified in Ext.R1(a). 3. In the above circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to furnish all the documents as stated in Ext.R1(a) forthwith, on receipt of which, further steps shall be taken by the respondents for causing necessary correction as to the change of name, as requested by the petitioner. The proceedings in this regard shall be finalised within three months from the date of satisfaction of the requirements shown in Ext.R1(a). The Writ Petition is disposed of. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE ab