IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19314 of 2011 JANARDAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for the State. The accused- petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Shahpur P.S. Case No. 22 of 2000 registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted that the petitioner was falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner was patient of Asthama and he was not in a position to commit such offence. Learned counsel for the State submits that petitioner is the main assailant and the death of the deceased Haleem Khan (son of informant) was caused by the petitioner by fire arm. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, in my opinion the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. Bhardwaj (Amaresh Kumar Lal,J.)