=1= IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX TAX TAX APPEAL NO.651 OF 2008 APPEAL NO.651 OF 2008 APPEAL NO.651 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-14, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 ...Appellant v/s Shri Gopikishan Daga Kalbadevi, Mumbai 400 002 ...Respondent Mr D.K. Konwal for Appellant. None for Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : D.K. DESHMUKH AND J.P. DEVADHAR JJ. D.K. DESHMUKH AND J.P. DEVADHAR JJ. D.K. DESHMUKH AND J.P. DEVADHAR JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 23RD SEPTEMBER 2008 23RD SEPTEMBER 2008 23RD SEPTEMBER 2008 =2= P.C.- 1. The question raised in this appeal is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of CIT-4, Mumbai v/s M/s Salfort Share and Stock Brokers Pvt.Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No.18 of 2006 decided on 8th August 2008. In this view of the matter therefore, this appeal cannot be entertained. Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary of the Court. . Certified copy is expedited. ( D.K. DESHMUKH J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR J.)