mgn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.16 OF 2009 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.245 OF 2002 Bharat Constructions ..Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Santosh Narwade i/b. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Petitioners Mr. S.S. Joshi, AGP for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, J. DATED : 8TH OCTOBER, 2009 P.C. On behalf of respondents learned AGP seeks time. Request for adjournment rejected. 2. By the order dated 18th November, 2002 interim order was passed, however, in the last sentence the following words were inserted:- “Petition disposed of accordingly.” 3. This is an apparent error in the order. Once the petition is admitted it could not be disposed of. 4. In the light of that the following words “Petition disposed of accordingly” are deleted from the order dated 18th November, 2002. 5. Registry is directed to place the Arbitration Petition for hearing in its own turn. Review Petition disposed off accordingly. (F.I. REBELLO,J.)