IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 718 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision : August 26, 2009 Gulshan Kumar Kalra Appellant Versus Subhash Kalra and others Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Present : Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Chander Shekhar, Advocate for respondent No. 1 Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 5 NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) Vide order dated 2.2.2008, the appellant was punished for disobeying the order dated 6.6.2005 passed in application under Order 39 Rule 2-A in the suit for rendition of accounts. Learned counsel for the parties state that the matter has been compromised, therefore, the said appeal be allowed in the terms of compromise. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection if the order dated 2.2.2008 passed by the Addl. District Judge, Kurukshetra is set aside. In view of the statement and also in view of the fact that the suit for rendition of accounts has since been withdrawn vide order dated 1.3.2008 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Kurukshetra, the order dated 2.2.2008 passed by the Addl. District Judge, Kurukshetra is set aside and the appeal is accordingly allowed. (Nirmaljit Kaur) 26.08.2009 Judge reena