IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 9555 of 2009 Between: 1 Chaliganti Rama Narsamma, W/o Venkaiah, R/o H.No. 12-55-2, Srinivasanagar, Katta Kommugudem, Near Perika Hostel, Kodad, Nalgonda District. 2 Deeguntal Suryakala, W/o Janaki Ramaiah, R/o H.No. 12-55-2, Srinivasanagar, Katta Kommugudem, Near Perika Hostel, Kodad, Nalgonda District. 3 Chittimalla Sarojini, W/o Gopal Krishna Rao, R/o H.No. 12-55-2, Srinivasanagar, Katta Kommugudem, Near Perika Hostel, Kodad, Nalgonda District. 4 Chaliganti Laxman Rao, S/o Venkaiah, R/o H.No. 12-55-2, Srinivasanagar, Katta Kommugudem, Near Perika Hostel, Kodad, Nalgonda District. 5 Chaliganti Venkata Laxmi,, W/o Laxman Rao, R/o H.No. 12-55-2, Srinivasanagar, Katta Kommugudem, Near Perika Hostel, Kodad, Nalgonda District. 6 Chaliganti Govardhan, S/o Venkaiah, R/o H.No. 12-55-2, Srinivasanagar, Katta Kommugudem, Near Perika Hostel, Kodad, Nalgonda District. 7 Chaliganti Ramana, S/o Venkaiah, R/o H.No. 12-55-2, Srinivasanagar, Katta Kommugudem, Near Perika Hostel, Kodad, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad. 2 Chaliganti Prameela, W/o Rama Rao, R/o 12-55-2-A/5, Srinivasanagar Katta Kommugudem, Near Perika Hostel, Kodad,Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto quash the proceedings in DVC.No. 3 of 2009 on the file of the J.F.C.M., Kodad, Nalgonda District, against the petitioners ie., Respondent No.2 to 8. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.KANAKA SUNDAR, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER PSR, J. Crl.P.No. 9555 of 2009 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners; Ms. Vijetha Borukati, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. Petitioner No.1 is the mother-in-law; Petitioner Nos. 2, 3 and 5 are the sisters-in-law and Petitioner Nos.4, 6 and 7 are the brothers- in-law of the of the de facto complainant. There are no specific allegations against them and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent contends that on account of the interim stay granted by this court, the proceedings against the main accused are stalled. 3. Accordingly, considering the circumstances of the case, the petition is allowed and the proceedings pending against the petitioners herein in D.V.C.No. 03 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kodad, Nalgonda District are hereby quashed. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. January 22, 2010. *BVS