IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4096 of 2011 LAL NARAYAN THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Maniyari P.S. Case No. 33 of 1993 registered under Sections 304B and 498A of the I.P.C. The case was instituted in 1993 and the petitioner’s anticipatory bail was earlier rejected by this Court. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of the learned court below as contained in Annexure-4 to the effect that due to non-production of any witnesses the other accused have been discharged though the petitioner’s case has been separated. This Court is not inclined to interfere only on the ground that the petitioner’s anticipatory bail application was rejected on 15.09.1994 and 30.08.1995 respectively. The discharge of other similarly situated accused can be a good ground for grant of regular bail to the 2 petitioner. Leaned court below may consider the regular bail application of the petitioner and, if possible, dispose off the same preferably on the same day provided the petitioner gives undertaking that he will appear regularly during his trial. With this observation, the application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed at the cost of the petitioner to the learned IXth Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Maniyari P.S. Case No. 33 of 1993. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)