1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.01.2011 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P(MD)No.837 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 T.C.Madhan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Thanthonimalai, Karur District, Karur. 2.The District Registrar (Societies), Collectorate, Thanthonimalai, Karur Post & District. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Thanthonimalai, Karur Post & District. 4.Mr.G.Ramanujam Naidu .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.12.2010 in the light of Section 36 of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 and pass appropriate orders within the stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh (R1 to R3) Govt.Advocate O R D E R The petitioner seeks a writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider his representation dated 28.12.2010 in the light of Section 36 of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975. 2.The petitioner is stated to be the Committee Member of Karur Sri Balijavar Naidu Mahajana Sangam. The said Society has been registered under the provisions of Societies Registration Act. The Society has been formed with a motive to equip the Balijavar Naidu Community in education and other fields. According to the petitioner, the 4th respondent has assumed the role of a saviour of the Society and he has convened a meeting scheduled to be held on 30.01.2011. The Agenda of the meeting shows that accounts would be certified and the new office bearers would be elected. The petitioner has alleged various violations against the 4th respondent and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 accordingly submitted a representation before the second respondent on 28.12.2010. Since the said representation has not been disposed of, the petitioner was constrained to file the writ petition. 3.I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. 4.Since the cause of action for filing this writ petition was only on account of the non-consideration of the representation dated 28.12.2010, I am of the view that interest of justice would be sub served in case a direction is issued to the second respondent to consider and dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner on merits and as per law. 5.Accordingly, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner on 28.12.2010 and dispose of the same on merits and as per law, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.side) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(C.S) To 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Thanthonimalai, Karur District, Karur. 2.The District Registrar (Societies), Collectorate, Thanthonimalai, Karur Post & District. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Thanthonimalai, Karur Post & District. +1 CC to Mr. V.Balaji, Advocate, Sr.No.3392 +1 CC to Mr. K.Govindarajan, Advocate, Sr.No.3379 +1 CC to Special Government Pleader, Sr.No.3573 MPK W.P(MD)No.837 of 2011 28.01.2011 TR : 21.02.2011 : 2p/7c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/