6» IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. S.?.3^.0F 2004 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^ Santosh Kumar Yadav, Age 30 years, S/o. Late sahas Ram Yadav, R/o. APO Deorbija, Tahsil Berla, District-Durg (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1] State of Chhattisgarh Through-Secretary, Education Department Mantralaya ^^ Raipur(C.G.) ^^•yiy 3 ..v^..**' ^* \^* <(-0^ ^ 2] District Education Officer Bemeta^ft, ay^' ^ District-Durg (C.G.) 3] State of Madhya Pradesh Through: Principle Secretary, General Administration, State ofM.P. Secretariat Bhopal.(M.P.) Union of India, Department of Personnel Training, Ministry ofPersonnel, Public Grievance and pension, (State Reorganization Cell) Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market New Delhi WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLES 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATOT®CHHATTISOARH 8 BHASFUR SIMGLBBBWCai : HON»BU&8HRI 8ATI8H K. A€anHOTM,J. WRIT PBTITIOII 110. 3838 OF 2004 Petitioner Rest)pndent8 versus Santosh Kumm- Yadav State of Chhattfsgarh & ors Ptesent : Shri Sameer Sahu, counsel for Itie petitioner, Shri Suxmt Verma, panel lawyer for fhe State. Shri S.K, Beriwal, counsel fi>r fhe rcspondent No.4, ORAL ORDER (27"»^a-u, 2006) The petitfoaer's father Shri ^Iias Ram Yadav died on 27-5,1998 in haraess whfle worfcmg as Peon in Gkwerament Higher Secondary School Deorbija, Tahsfl Berala, Distrfct Dui^. The petitiouer made an applicatfon for compassionate appoiatment on 17.8.1998, but tEU date, his application for compassionate appomtment has not been decided. The Govemment of Chhattisgprii> by its ciaxnilar dated 2.2.2006, has directed aU the departments to consida: cases of all fhe eligibfc dependant-legal heir of fbe employees, who died m hamess between 1.11.1997 to 31.10.2000 for coixipasskmate appomtixieiit Accordingty, fhe Govarmneiit of Chhattisgarfa is duw^ted to consider fbe case of the petitioner as per its cwn circidar dated 2.2.2006 and also in view ofthe order dated 20.12.2005 passed by fhis Court in Writ Petition No. 1322/2002 and other connected inatters on its own merit^ inaccordance wifh law, on such reprcsenlation beiog filed by the petitibaer. ^'^ a^ r>A 4. For the reasons stated abcwe, fbe writ petitaon staiads disposed of. No oider as to costs. Certified copy as per nries. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge