THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.28772 of 2009 ORDER: Though the matter is at the interlocutory stage, on the request made by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition itself is taken up for being disposed of by this order. Petitioner has claimed purchase of a portion of the land covered by Survey Nos.37, 38 and 39 part situated at Kothapet Village, Uppal Revenue Mandal, LB Nagar Municipality. To survey the said area, he filed a representation before the second respondent – Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records, Ranga Reddy District, on 25.05.2009. His grievance is that so far, no demarcation of the land has been done. Complaining the action of the respondents, he filed this writ petition. While admitting the writ petition, this Court passed interim order on 30.12.2009 directing the third respondent – Tahsildar, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, to demarcate the land of the petitioner. It is to be noticed that even according to the petitioner, he purchased a portion of the land covered by aforesaid Survey Numbers. He has not applied for sub-divisional survey numbers and no sub- division was done separating the land purchased by him. In the absence of any sub-division, it cannot be a matter of record before the Survey and Settlement Department. As evident from the counter-affidavit, the petitioner is also not able to locate the land purchased by him. If there is any boundary dispute with regard to the area purchased by the petitioner, it is for him to establish in the civil Court but on the ground that he filed a representation before the Survey Department, no direction can be issued by this Court to the respondents to survey the land alleged to have been purchased by him covered by the aforesaid survey numbers. Further, according to respondents 5 to 9, who were impleaded as party respondents in this writ petition vide order, dated 18.04.2011 passed by this Court in WPMP.No.4705 of 2010, they have filed a separate suit for declaration of title by impleading the petitioner herein. For the aforesaid reasons, the petitioner is not entitled to the relief as prayed for in this writ petition. However, it is open to him to workout his remedies before the civil Court. The writ petition is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 10th JUNE, 2011. kvni