IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 2ND JANUARY 2009 / 12TH POUSHA 1930 RSA.No. 1246 of 2004() ---------------------- AS.4/1991 of ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT (ADHOC), MANJERI OS.70/1988 of MUNI-MAGI.COURT,PERINTHALMANNA .................... APPELLANT --------------------- ARIPARAMBIL NABEESA, D/O.KOMUKUTTY HAJI, PANG AMSOM AND DESOM, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SR.) RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. PAROLI MOHAMMED HAJI, S/O.UNNEEN, PANG AMSOM DESOM, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. PAROLI UNNEEN, S/O.MOHAMMED HAJI, PANG AMSOM DESOM, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) FOR R2 SMT.M.M.DEEPA FOR R2 SRI.JAYKAR.K.S. FOR R2 SRI.RAVI.K.(PARIYARATH) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.S.A.No.1246 of 2004 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 2 nd day of January 2009 JUDGMENT Notice to the 1st respondent returned unserved with an endorsement “expired”. In spite of sufficient opportunities having been given, the appellant did not take any steps for impleading the Legal representatives of the deceased respondent. Since the position continued to be the same on 16.12.08, this Court posted the case for disposal today. Today also no steps have been taken and there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Accordingly, this second appeal is dismissed for default. Dated this the 2 nd day of January, 2009. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE sj