IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13623 of 2010 1. SONA DEVI WIFE OF LATE HRIDAYA PRASAD 2. MANOJ KUMAR SON OF LATE HRIDYA PRASAD, BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JAINAGAR MANSAHI, P.S. MANSAHI, DISTRICT- KATIHAR Versus 1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, CENTRALWARE HOUSING CORPORATION, 4/1 SIRI INSTITUTIONHAL AREA, WARE HOUSING BHAWAN, AUGUST KRANTI MARG ( HOUSE KHAS), NEW DELHI-110016 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRALWARE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD., MAURYA LOK COMPLEX, PATNA 3. MANAGER, CENTRALWARE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD. MARKETING YARD, TEENGACHHIYA, KATIHAR 4. SMT. NIRMALA DEVI WIFE OF LATE HRIDYA PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAGHUNATHPUR, P.S. BRAHMPUR, DISTRICT- BUXAR ----------- 2 25.08.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the respondent-Corporation. The grievance of the petitioners is that the petitioner no.1 is the widow of the deceased employee namely, Late Hridaya Prasad, who died in harness on 02.07.2010 while working as Sweeper in the office of the respondent no.3, however the death-cum-retiral dues has not been paid to her despite representation as contained in Annexure-2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Corporation submits that admittedly the respondent no.5 is the wife of the deceased employee. The petitioner no.1 claims herself to be the widow as she married the deceased employee after divorce. It is further submitted that on perusal of the representation as contained in Annexure-2 it would appear that there was no divorce in law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for - 2 - the petitioners submits that at least the petitioner no.2 being the son is entitled to the share in the retiral dues of the deceased employee, and as such, for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.3 with a copy to the respondent no.1. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the admitted dues may be paid to the rightful claimants as per rule. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)