IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2438 of 2009 1. RAM SWAROOP MAHTO, S/o late Ganga Mahto 2. Dinai @ Doman Mahto, S/o Ram Swaroop Mahato Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ---with--- Cr.Misc. No.3825 of 2009 BRIJNANDAN SINGH @ VIJAY PRAKASH, S/o late Hargovind Mahto Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ---with--- Cr.Misc. No.50082 of 2008 CHANDRIKA MAHTO, S/o late Uma Mahto Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ---with--- Cr.Misc. No.534 of 2009 KISHORE PANDEY, S/o late Ramji Pandey Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ---- 2/ 18.03.2009 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The allegation is levelled against the petitioners except one of the petitioners Brijnandan Singh that they were seen with the deceased on tempo and for accusing Brijnandan Singh, they had done him to death. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Brijnandan Singh in Cr. Misc. no. 3825 of 2009 is that there is no allegation at all against him. Finding no allegation of the overt act, the petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 3825 of 2009 is enlarged on bail. Let the above named petitioner in Cr. Misc. no. 3825 of 2009 be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jehanabad in Makhdumpur P.S. Case no. 184 of 2008. 2 So far as rest petitioners are concerned, it is said that there is nothing to connect all the three petitioners save and except suspicion but it is a clear case of last seen though much more was needed that is filled by finding blood stains from the compound which was in unauthorized occupation of Ramswaroop, father of Doman Mahto and finding the dead body at a distance on the bridge. Thus, at the moment, it is not a fit case for bail for rest of the petitioners. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)