IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 28TH MAY 2010 / 7TH JYAISHTA 1932 WP(C).No. 16433 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- KAREEM, S/O. MUSTHAFA, AGED 52 YEARS, NEDUMPILLIL HOUSE, 5/561, KAVALANGAD, OONNUKAL P.O., KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682 030. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OONNUKAL POLICE STATION, OONNUKAL P.O., KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 16433 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 28th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext.P2 order passed by the District Collector, Ernakulam, whereby pending final orders to be passed under the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, the petitioner has been permitted interim custody of the vehicle seized on the conditions mentioned therein. On a reading of Ext.P2, I find that the conditions prescribed therein are perfectly in tune with the directions in the decision of this Court in District Collector, Malappuram v. Abdul Kasim [2010 (1) KLT SN 31 (C.No.38)]. That being so, there is no infirmity whatsoever in Ext.P2 order and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge