IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH MAY 2010 / 29TH VAISAKHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 2439 of 2010() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.567/10 OF THEVARA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM. (S): PETITIONER ------------------------------ 1. MUHAMMED ANISH, S/O.MUHAMMED ASLAM, AYSHA MANZIL, NEAR MASGID, HMT COLONY, KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. ANOOP KRISHNAN.K., S/O.P.Y.BALAKRISHNAN, THEKKE VEEDU, PATTOT, AGANNOOR P.O., KANJANGAD. 3. USMAN KARIYATH, KALAVU, MAKKARAPARAMBU P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. RAMSHAD ALI, S/O.ANWAR ALI.K., KUSHIKANDAM HOUSE, NEAR COMMUNITY HALL, VANDOOR P.O., MALAPPURAM. 5. SREEJITH, S/O.GOPALAKRISHNAN, VILAMBAMURIPARAMBIL, BEENA ANCHUMAN ROAD, EDAPPALLY, COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANU SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHARAN PILLAI (VENNELA) RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY S.I. OF POLICE, THEVARA POLICE STATION, THEVARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, (NOTICE WHOM MAY BE SERVED ON THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.TEK CHAND. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.HEMA, J. ---------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.2439 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 19th May, 2010. O R D E R This petition is for anticipatory bail. 2. According to prosecution, the defacto complainant arranged Visa for petitioners to go abroad. They did not get the job as agreed and hence they came back. The defacto complainant's case is that petitioners have committed breach of the agreement entered into between him and petitioners and petitioners brought ill repute to the company, in which the job was arranged and thereby cheated the defacto complainant. 3. Heard both sides. According to learned counsel for the petitioners, petitioners are actually cheated by the defacto complainant by not arranging job as agreed and the complaint is filed by making false allegations. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that petitioners may be directed to appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation and subject to that he has no objection in granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that BA NO.2439/10 2 anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners. Hence, the following order is passed : (i) Petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer within seven days from today and co- operate with the investigation. (ii) Petitioners shall, in the event of their arrest, be released on bail, on their executing bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. Petition is allowed. K.HEMA, JUDGE. tgs