IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11071 of 2010 Date of decision: 24th June, 2010 Jai Bhagwan .......Petitioner Versus Municipal Corporation, Panipat ........Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ALOK SINGH, J.(ORAL) Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. Learned Counsel for the petitioner is impugning the order dated 7.6.2010 issued by the Municipal Commissioner, Panipat. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that although everything has been finalized in the earlier litigation, however ignoring the decision in favour of the petitioner, impugned order is issued by the learned Commissioner sue moto, who has absolutely no jurisdiction to issue the impugned order. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further contends that after receiving the impugned order dated 7.6.2010, petitioner has submitted the reply through Advocate dated 14.6.2010. He states that no decision is being taken on the reply to notice dated 14.6.2010. This petition can be disposed of with the direction to the CWP No.11071 of 2010 -2- respondents to take decision by passing speaking order on the impugned order dated 7.6.2010 and reply dated 14.06.2010 after hearing the petitioner. Till decision is taken on the reply to notice dated 14.6.2010, order dated 7.6.2010 shall not be given effect to. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( ALOK SINGH ) JUDGE 24.6.2010 ashish