IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 13862 of 2008. Decided on: 24.2.2011. Seesh Ram Thakur ……….Petitioner. Versus H.P. State Electricity Board & another ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners. : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Tarlok Jamwal, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to subsequent developments. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. February 24, 2011 (hl) (Rajiv Sharma) Judge 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.