(1) RA. 14.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 14 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 252 OF 2008 Subhash S/o Pandharinath Shinde & ors. .. Applicants VERSUS Rajshree w/o Sanjay Navgire .. Respondent Mr. Madhav Gude, Advocate for the applicants/appellants Mr. B.S. Shinde, Advocate h/f. Mr. P.F. Patni, Advocate for the respondent CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2010 P.C.:- 1] Heard. The applicants/appellants are seeking review of the order dated 24.7.2009 only because their subsequent suit is still pending in the lower Court and they apprehended that the findings recorded in this litigation would cause prejudice to them in that suit. This can-not be a reason for which an application for review can be allowed. The order under review considered as to whether there existed any substantial question of law. In the absence of such substantial question, the Appeal was dismissed. The appellants are now unable to escape this reality while dealing with their subsequent litigation. The Review Application stands rejected. Sd/- (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.) arp