IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR g (CG) WRIT PETITION No. Sig” 12005 PETITIONER Kanhaiyalal Majhi, H l/’ aged l/ about 32 years, son of Lam Shamnath Majhi, As‘sistant Teacher, Balak Ashram Kandari, Vikash Khand Orchha & Shaikshik Shankul Samanvayak, Kurusnar, Vikash Khand Orchha, Tah. Narayanpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through — the Secretary, Department of Triable. Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director, Rajiv Tribal Welfare, Jagdalpur (C.G.) 5, Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayai, Narayanpur, District Bastar (C.G.) Bastar Gandhi Mission, Raipur (C.G-) 3. Collector, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) 4. Asst Commissioner, 6. Block Education Officer, Narayanpur, Distt. Bastar (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, Aku ‘x \61. a. XI-HC—zz ”$5 :gsja; w 200 . ............................................. Wg? ............. mmm ‘ W‘W W1 . m am m r o-i" ‘u5 Qhri A N Rhakf n . Heard‘ v ' > Learned counsei for the petitoner submits that the petitioner has been transferred from Baiak Ashram: Kandari to Kanya Ashram, Grc‘n'na vide order dated 1‘6— J 200:) \Anneyure—H'j). He fud'ner submite that during the ban period the petitioner has been trahsterree that too without Seeking any coordinationuahd prior approvai of the et hag been transferred Shri Bhakta, teamed :ouhsei appearing for the petitioner states that tor the present ends of justice wiii be served it a\direoti‘on is given to the respondent authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner. Having considered and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the taue the petitioner is direotedeto make a deta ied representation raising his grievances oerore the bompetent authority of respondente aionowith a eooy of the petition and this order i \HHVHH a periOV" OT IWO \NeeKS TrOm IOG ay aria On SUCH YEDFEeEHIaIiOH 06mg WP POmpeIem aUmOmIy Oi Ute F68pOHQBWS Sriaii GBCiGe Vie $am6 OH IIS OWI’i met {:31 aCCOFGaHOe WIU‘i iaW a5 eariy 61S DOSSID e pre/Tetamy \NHZFHI'] a perlOQ OT {W0 mOFIIF‘S ir'Om the date of receipt of representation, it s made oiear that if any grievance stiii remains: the petitioner'may avaii the remedy avai abie underthe iaw. Leafned couneei for the petitio er submite that tiii date the {petitioner has not been relieved He pravs tor grant ot int nm reiiet in View ot tne above it is direct d that it the petitioner is not re ieved ne may be iS GECiGeQ umel far t.e n9fifimpr w, Ch Uauwcp Uu m Cc“. v 1+ mmmm Aduhani’n C” L” slatn Chief Minister, He aiso submits that due/to some‘poiitioai vendetta the pettt i The prayer is not oppoeed by the State counsei. AnQc aliOWEQ IO COnIinUe UH U19 fepl’esei’itaii . VVifh Ute EiTGreSaKJ ODSENaTiOHS Imc pETITiOU SYdHQS QiSpOSEO OT LOHSSQUSHTiy, lVi \VV j t" NO 44/ {/AUU’S 6: i l-‘i NO 85/] N2UUD aiSO Starla GiepOScC! , Sdl- . Fakhruddin Judge Ceitined copy as per ruies. v n n Q “