IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 547 OF 2010 MR. AMOL N. TENDULKAR ... Petitioner Versus CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Shri Galileo Teles, Advocate for the Petitioner. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 6th December, 2010 P.C.:- Heard Shri G. Teles, learned Counsel for the Petitioner. There is no dispute that on 29-10-2009 when Respondent No.3 filed an application for certain information, the Right to Information Act, 2005 was very much in force, and, therefore the Petitioner could have given information to Respondent No.3. Hence, no interference with the first part of the Order is concerned. As regards the second part of the Order, the Petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same in case the explanation called for is found unsatisfactory by the Commission and the Petitioner is penalised. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed off. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.