§'§§(§H CQUR? (3F CH§€ATTQ$€§ARH AT giLASPUR mViSEQN 3EN$§1§ isc“ Aame&§ No. ?51 of 2mm- Sukhvincie:’ $ingh, s/o late Darshan Singh, aged about 22 years, I accupation Kha§asi, R/o Jéaatclur ward N0. 4/195, Raigarh, Ta§s§fanc§ 3istrici: Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) VE§§SU$ U) §€e$p0ndant$ 1. Banmaii S/o Not Kmwn, occupation Nars-appiicai‘rts Eus Driver, Bus N0. O.R.N.. 7455, CfO Nand Kishpre Bus Service, Sundagarh (Grissa) Nand Kishore Jatswai, Bus Owner No. O.R-.N.. 7455, Radheyshyam Bus Service, District Sundergarh \ {A wag) 7., Nmiona! lnSurance Co. Divisional Qffice MG Toad, Ra§pur \Vhs I!“ L.nauisgah H3 i) 8. Nishikant Agnihotri, Truc‘k Owner MIL 7272, R/o Bus Stand Sharamjaigarh, Di$trict Raigarh, Tha Oriental insurance Co Ltd, Branch Office, itwari Bazar, Raigarh (CG) Misn. ngpgal under Seciian W3 (if ting Molar Vehicie5 kct {Q ‘vx Present: None for the appellant. Shri Anand Gupta, caunsel on behalf of Shri Raj Awasinl, counsel for respondent No7. Snri Abnishek Sinhe, counsel for respondent No g QR§ER M Vi Q23” septembeg, 2mm The foHowing order af the Court was pa3$éd by Rajaev Gupia, CJ. None for the appeiiant. 2) As there is n0 representation on behalf of the appeilant, we are ief’t with no other option, but to dismies the appea! for want of proeecuiion. z 3§ The appeai, therefore, is dismiesed for want of prosecution. Sd/- _ ‘ Sdl- Chief Justice? Sunil Kumar Shh/arr, Judge