HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITON No.5588 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner herein is the judgment debtor. He suffered a decree in the suit in O.S.No.332 of 2005. The petitioner-judgment debtor has not paid the decreetal amount and, as such, the first respondent-decree holder filed E.P.No.163 of 2006 before the learned Senior Civil Judge, Gajuwaka for realization of the decreetal amount. After conducting enquiry in the Execution Petition, the learned Judge, by order dated 22.09.2008, allowed the said petition directing the petitioner-judgment debtor to pay an amount of Rs.1,43,146/- to the first respondent-decree holder by 23.11.2008, failing which, arrest warrant would be issued to send him to the civil prison for realization of the E.P. amount. Aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition is filed by the petitioner- judgment debtor. Heard both the counsel. While ordering notice before admission on 12.12.2008, this Court granted interim stay on condition of the petitioner depositing half of the decreetal amount within a period of four weeks from that day. By order dated 24.04.2009, this Court further extended time by one more week to comply with the order dated 12.12.2008. Further, an application in CMP.No.2719 of 2009 was filed seeking further extension of time to deposit the amount. This Court, by order dated 22.01.2010, extended time by two more weeks and permitted the first respondent-decree holder to withdraw the deposited amount. Both the counsel would submit that half of the decreetal amount had already been deposited by the petitioner-judgment debtor and the respondent-decree holder had already withdrawn the same. Learned Counsel for the petitioner-judgment debtor seeks four months time for payment of the balance E.P. amount. Learned Counsel for the respondent-decree holder insists that the payment should be made within reasonable time i.e. not later than three months. Having regard to the fact that the learned counsel for the petitioner-judgment debtor sought time to pay the balance E.P. amount within a stipulated time frame, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the Civil Revision Petition, without going into the merits of the case, with a direction to the petitioner-judgment debtor to deposit the balance E.P. amount within a period of three months from today. On such deposit, the respondent-decree holder is permitted to withdraw the same without furnishing any security. Failing which, it is open to the first respondent-decree holder to get the impugned order executed before the Court below. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs. V. ESWARAIAH,J Date:16.12.2010 usd