IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 22ND JUNE 2010 / 1ST ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 17943 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------- V.S.RAMESH AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.SURENDRAN VADAKKUMPARAMBIL HOUSE,P.O.ALAPPAD, ALAPPAD VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.G.SURESH SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE SUUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANTHIKKAD POLICE STATION,THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. SANOJ AGED 22 YEARS,S/O.JANARDHANAN, VADAKKUMPARAMBIL HOUSE, P.O.PUTHENPEEDIKA, PUTHENPEEDIKA DESAM,THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. SANEESH AGED 20 YEARS,S/O.JANARDHANAN, VADAKKUMPARAMBIL HOUSE, P.O.PUTHENPEEDIKA, PUTHEPEEDIKA DESAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 6. SAJINI AGED 40 YEARS, W/O.JANARDHANAN,VADAKKUMPARAMBIL HOUSE, P.O.PUTHENPEEDIKA, PUTHENPEEDIKA DESOM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 7. JANARDHANAN AGED 46 YEARS, VADAKKUMPARAMBIL HOSUE,P.O.PUTHENPEEDIKA, PUTHENPEEDIKA DESAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. G.P. SHRI T K VIPINDAS FOR R1-3 ADV. SRI.RAJIT FOR R4 TO 6 SRI.RANJIT BABU FOR R-4 TO 6 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 17943 of 2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR FILING A COMPLAINT BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 2.6.2010 FILED BEFORE THE 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL // TRUE COPY // K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 17943 of 2010 P - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. The petitioner has approached this court seeking the following reliefs: “i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to provide adequate protection to the life and personal liberty of the petitioner as well as his family, which includes his wife and two children viz. Shameen and Ranya. ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or directions to respondents 2 and 3 to consider and take appropriate action on Ext.P2 representation preferred by the petitioner by affording a reasonable W.P.(C).No. 17943 of 2010 2 opportunity of being heard to the petitioner without any further delay.” 2. We heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for respondents 4 to 7 as also the learned Government Pleader. 3. Learned counsel for respondents 4 to 7 has filed a counter affidavit denying the allegations. He would submit that the allegations are incorrect. He also submits that the respondents have no intention to cause any threat to the petitioner or his family members. 4. We record the said submission and dispose of the Writ Petition in terms of the interim order. We make it clear that we have not pronounced on the correctness of the allegations made by the petitioner or respondents 4 to 7. It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that two crimes have been registered. We W.P.(C).No. 17943 of 2010 3 make it clear that nothing contained in this judgment shall stand in the way of the official respondents investigating the two crimes. (K. M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm