IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12046 of 2007 Sunita Kumari@ Rajmuni Devi, Wife of Shri Upendra Singh Bhogta, Resident of Village Chhakarbandha, Tola Tarchuan, P.O. Pipra, P.S. Dumaria, Block Dumaria, District Gaya. ------ Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Director, Department of Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. District Magistrate, Gaya. 4. District Welfare Officer, Gaya. 5. District Programme Officer, Gaya. 6. Sub. Divisional Officer, Sherghatti, District Gaya. 7. Block Development Officer, Dumaria, District Gaya. 8. Child Development Project Officer, Dumaria, District Gaya. 9. Mukhia, Chhakarbandha Gram Panchayat, Block Dumaria, District Gaya. 10. Panchayat Sachif, Chhakarbandha Gram Panchayat, Block Dumaria, District Gaya. 11. Munka Devi, Wife of Raj Kumar Singh Bhogta, Resident of Village Chhakarbandha, Tola Tarchuan, Block Dumaria, P.S. Dumaria, P.O. Pipra, District Gaya. -------- Respondents ----------- 2 17.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “1. That the petitioner is invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/ directions, particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus, commanding and directing the respondent authorities to set up an enquiry to enquire into the matter impartial in selection/appointment of Anganwadi Sevika for Tarkuan Centre in the Gram Panchayat Raj, Chhakarbandha, under the district of 2 Gaya, in which irregularities have been committed by the respondents to appoint the respondent no.11 on the aforesaid post, as alleged by the petitioner; and further be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to select/consider the appointment of the petitioner in place of respondent no.11 as per guidelines issued by the authority for selection/appointment of the Aanganwadi Sevika.” With reference to the aforementioned reliefs, counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not approached the competent authority, namely, the Collector of the district and as such, liberty may be given to her to file a compact representation. Acceding to the aforementioned submission, this application is permitted to be withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Collector of the district, who being the prescribed authority under the guideline issued by the State Government, is expected to pass a final order within a time limit now fixed by the Government Circular dated 10.12.2009. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)