i t h G Stngle Brnch IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (CINO. ^6°)^ OF 2011 PETITIONER: ^< y^^^ \n RESPONDENTS: 1. ASHA MAHILA SWA-SAHAYATA SAMUH - SANDI, acting through President, SMT. DIGESHWARI VARMA, W/0 Shri Suresh Varma, R/0 Village, Sandi, Post-Mudpar, Tahsil and P.S- Pallari, District-Raipur (C.G) VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, through the Secretani, EXCISE DEPARTMENT, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. EXCISE COMISSIONER, Raipur (C.G) 3. COLLECTOR, District-Raipur (C.G). 4. ^ SOM LAL. S/o Fagva Ram, Resident of House No. 24, Gaugi, Tahsil- Dondilohara, District-Durg (C.G). 5. GRAM PANCHAYAT- SANDI (MUDPAR) acting thorough Sarpanch, having office at- Panchayat Bhawan, Mudpar, Tahsil-Pallari, District-Raipur (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS, DIRECTIONS ETC., IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WMT OF LIKE NATURE ^~~~] H!GIi€QURTQF<2UIATn8GARHATBILASPUR WRrTPETinONrC^No. 2593 of2011 PETmONER RESPONbENTS Asha Maliila Swa Sahayata Samuih Sajidi. VERSU8 State ofChhattisgarh & Others; WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF 'FHE CONSTrTUTlO^OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aemhotn, J. Present: Shri Nijchil Agrawal, Advocate^ f^ ShriAjayDwivedvDeputyG^vemment^A^ State. QRDER(ORAL) (Passed on 12th day ofMay, 2011) i'l ^^ 1. Learnedcounsel appearingibr fhe pet^ permissionofliiisCourttowithdraw^^^^^^ 2. Leamedcounselappearingfbrot^ 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the ^wit petrt Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i, Amit