C.R. No. 6617 of 2009 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 6617 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.8.2010 Gian Singh .....Petitioner Versus Gurjant Singh and another ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri B.S. Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned first Appellate Court on 18.8.2009, whereby an application seeking ad-interim injunction, restraining the defendants from alienating the suit property, was dismissed. The parties are said to be co-owners. The learned trial Court restrained the respondents from alienating specific portion of the suit property, but in appeal it was found that no injunction can be granted against the co-owner in respect of the sale of the property. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that the defendants are threatening to sell the property over and C.R. No. 6617 of 2009 (O&M) [2] above their share. Therefore, they should be restrained from selling the property more than their share. The said argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner does not warrant any consideration, in as much as, the sale by the defendants beyond their share will not confer any right, title or interest on the vendee. Consequently, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the impugned order, which may warrant interference by this Court, in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. [HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 13.8.2010 ds