MP - -1- WP21_11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 21 OF 2011 Janardan Sukhdev Patil and another .. Petitioners Versus Dilavar Ismaiel Bagwan and others .. Respondents Mr. R. K. Bobade for Petitioners. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. MARCH 04, 2011 P. C. : By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 10th August 2010 vide which the application filed by the present petitioner for not taking on record the additional pleadings of defendant No. 3, came to be rejected. In the suit filed by the plaintiff, during the pendency of the suit, the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 had sold the property to the defendant No. 3. He was added as a party defendant. While adopting the written statement of the defendant Nos. 1 and 2, he has also filed the additional pleadings. According to the petitioner, the same were not tenable, and therefore, the aforesaid application came to be filed. The same is rejected. Hence the present petition. 2. The learned Trial Court while rejecting the application has found that the defendant No. 3, while adopting the written statement of defendant Nos. 1 and 2, has given additional pleadings, and therefore, it cannot be said as additional written statement. As such, the application is rejected. 3. No perversity is noticed in the approach adopted by the learned Trial Court to warrant interference. Hence rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)