IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 21ST JUNE 2011 / 31ST JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 14306 of 2011(K) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SMT. ANITHA M.K, ATTENDANT, VETERINARY DISPENSARY, EDARIKKODE, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.JAGADEESH LAKSHMAN RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO MINISTRY OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRYM GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 001. 3. THE DISTRICT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY OFFICER ALAPPUZHA, OFFICE OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY ALAPPUZHA. 676 505. 4. THE DISTRICT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY OFFICER MALAPPURAM,OFFICE OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, MALAPPURAM. 676 505. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.SANDESH RAJA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.14306/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.K1.66/2008/ESTT. OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT DTD. 25.8.08. P2:- COPY OF THE STATEMENT FILED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT BEFORE THIS HONOURABLE COURT DTD. 5.6.2009. P3:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WPC. NO.11081/2009 DTD. 30.6.2009. P4:- COPY OF THE ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN REVIEW PETITION NO.988/10 IN WPC. NO.11081/09 DTD. 9.11.10. P5:- COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD. 30.9.2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE tss S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 14306 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 21st day of June, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is an Attendant in the Veterinary Dispensary at Edarikkode in Malappuram district. By Ext. P1 order dated 25.8.2008, the petitioner was transferred to Alappuzha district and allotted to the District Animal Husbandry Officer, Alappuzha. But, that was not implemented. On the representation filed by the petitioner pursuant to Ext. P4, Ext. P5 order was passed by the Director of Animal Husbandry directing the 3rd respondent to give the petitioner a posting in one of the vacancies, which would arise in April, 2011. The petitioner filed this writ petition complaining that even that order is not also being complied with. 2. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that orders have been issued implementing Ext. P1. But the petitioner submits that the present posting is away from her home and therefore she seeks a convenient posting. Insofar as the only prayer in the writ petition is to implement Exts.P1 and P5 orders, which have already been implemented, this writ petition is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority for a convenient posting. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/