c^ ^ ^ INTHEHON'BLB HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR •h|h Sencfc W.P. f S) No. /2011 PETITIONBR: ^ .^s^ ^.^••^ %?" ^-^ .-•' s^ / y RESPONDBNTS: Dinesh Kumar Netam S/o Shri H.R.Netam Aged about 30 years Occupation -Rural Agriculture Extension Officer at office of Senior Agriculture Officer Chindgarh Dist - Dantewada (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through, Secretary , Department of Agriculture Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Collector , Dantewada District Dantewada (C. G) 3. Deputy Director , Agriculture , Distfict ^ Dantewada ( €^<j.) e¥-^ -Y ^ 4) WRIT PKTITION UNDBR ARTXCLB 226/227 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITJONER WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3132 OF 2011 c Dinesh Kumar Netam VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh & Others. ^. RESPONDENTS : WRIT PETITJON UNDER ART1CLE 226/227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDiA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Adnihotri. J. Present: Ms. DeepaIiPandey, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwlvedi, Dy. Govt, Advocate for the State. ORDER fORALI (Passed on this 20th dayofJune, 2011) ? 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 29.06.2009 (Annexure P/1), the petitioner, working as Rural Agricuiture Extension Officer at the Office of Senior Agriculture Development Offlcer, Chhindgarh, District Dantewaela, has been transferred to under .the Deputy Director Agriculture Kanker, District Kanker, on his own request. However, the petitioner has not yet been reiieved to join the new place of posting. Ms. Pandey submits that once the order of transfer has been passed, i? is for the government to ensure that it is compiied with immediateiy. She reiies on a declsion of the Supreme Court in Sreedam Chandra Ghosh v. State of Assam & others , m support of his contention that ifthe order is not complied with, a direction can be issued for enforcementthereof. 2. Shri Dwivedi, iearned Oy. Govt. Advocate appearing for the State/ respondents submits that that if the transfer order dated 29.06.2009 (Annexure P/1) is stiii in existence and has not been compiied with, appropriate steps would betaken to compiy with the order. / 3. If the aforesaid transfer order is stili In exlstence, the government is under an obligation to comply with the same at once. it is accordingly directed that the transfer order shall be compiied with forthwith, within a period oftwoweeks. _________—- 4. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of. S Satish K. Agnihotrl Judge ashok 1 (1996)108cc 567