^- ^) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR PETITiONER Smt. Amita Sherpa, D/o Shri Ramsai Sherpa, Aged about 37 years, R/o VHIage Dugli, Tahsil Nagri, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Department of Women & Child Development, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. ihav/an, Raipur(C.G.) 2 The Coliector, DistrictDhamtari (C.G.) 3 Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Nagri District Dhamtari 4. District Chiid and Women (C.G.) 5. Project Officer, Integrated Deveiopment Project Nagri- Sihawa, DistrictDhamtari(C.G.) Siddique, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the S Heard. The petitioner has challenged the vaiidity of the order dated 18/5/2007 (Annexure P/15) passed by the Coliector, by which, a direction has been issued to cancel the appointment of the petitioner on the ground that the father of the petitioner is working as a Forest Guard. Thers is a reference in the order about the guidelines to be foiiowsd in the matter of appointment of Aanganbadi Worker and appointment of the petitioner has been directed to be cancelled on the fo!!owin$ ground, which is contained in para 3 of the guidelines daied 6 of January 2000: r'r \W(S) No.6269/2007 ^z " 3. ^ W<h^\ *4^1'?1 3WIT 4^11^ :7T3T W?a.n3fr/: tora ^ tofto siaiciT wFte ^rwi s^rar ^i^ wt ;^t ^RT 3T"T;TOfr cb|4t0<rt{ f^icRT ^ terr ^T w^n i" Learned counse! for the State submits that admitted'y, this otder reiates to cancellation of appointment of Aanganfcad'Worker, for which, there is a provision of appeal before the Appellate Authorlty. In view of the above, 1 am not inclined to interfere in this matter at this stage. However, without commenting on the merits of the case, this pefition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to fi!e a duiy constituted appea! before the Appellate Authority. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge u