IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18504 of 2011 Ajay Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with Cr.Misc. No.18473 of 2011 Dinesh Kumar Pal Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03. 05.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Three unknown persons taken informant’s son with his tractor on hire on 14.10.2010 and his son’s dead body was found on 16.10.2010. Three of the witnesses in Paragraphs-52, 53 and 54 name petitioner Ajay Paswan as one of the persons hired the tractor. He was later on identified in T. I. Parade conducted in the case that is doubted on the ground that their statement came only after a lapse of more than two and half months and T. I. Parade was conducted after lapse of nearabout two months after arrest of these petitioners. Informant is not connected in any way with the witnesses examined in Paragraphs-52, 53 and 54 of the case diary. Only his son was known to them as plying of tractor, so may not be doubted at this stage. As about petitioner Dinesh Kumar Pal a mobile of the deceased was recovered from his possession that is said purchased from one Haidar Ali who has confessed his guilt by stating sale of the mobile to this petitioner, but such confession is made before the police. Hence, is not admissible or acceptable for 2 the purpose of even bail. Accordingly, petitioners’ prayer for regular bail stand rejected. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)