ssp 1 WP(L) 2345 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2345 OF 2011 Sahadev Walwatkar and Ors. .....Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.Vishwasrao S. Deokar, for the petitioners. Mr.D.A.Nalawade, Govt. Pleader, for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE: 25 th NOVEMBER, 2011 P.C. 1. By way of this petition, the petitioners have challenged the agreement entered into by the respondent No.2 with respondent No.5 which is of 2008. According to the petitioners, the respondent No.2 had no authority to entered into an agreement with the respondent No.5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent No.2 is not an Administrator and still he is meddling with the affairs of the Society. 2. In our view, the appropriate remedy in this behalf available to the petitioners is to file civil proceedings before the appropriate forum. It will be open to the petitioners to file appropriate civil suit for declaration and asking for appropriate interim injunction in such a suit. This Court cannot examine such point especially when the agreement is of ssp 2 WP(L) 2345 of 2011 2008 and such a disputed question of facts cannot be examined by this Court, as the only fact finding Court can examine this aspect. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent No.4 and 5 are head-strong people and they might take law in their hands and the petitioners apprehend about their safety. If the petitioners have any such apprehension, it will be open to the petitioners to file complaint and ask to give police protection to them. If they apprehend any untoward incident, they can seek action against the said respondents. 4. In view of what is stated above, the writ petition is disposed of. ( MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)