^} »Wtteeflch IN THE HQNJBLE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No ^~/J of 2010. fRelated Writ Petition (Civil) No. 135^ 2010 "Trilochan Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors" dismissed for want of prosecution today on 06.12.2010]. PETITIONER: /^ Trilochan Singh Chawala S/o Late Surjeet ^ Singh Chawala, aged about 62 years, all ......i—p:"";L""R/oSuijeet Niwas, 3/51, Ravi Nagar, !:^m'S"<5:fc(A:5i""R£upur'chhattisgarh' ^.^...-y RESPONDENTS: Rl. y y. / 03. State of Chhattisgarh through their Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Sub Divisional Officer, Land Acqisition Officer, Raipur, Tahsil: Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Collector and Ex-officio Deputy Secretary, Revenue Department, Chhattisgarh Govemment, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Naya Raipur Development Authority, In front of the Mahanadi Dwar, Mantralaya, Raipur - 492001, Chhattisgarh. Through: Their Chief Executive Officer. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF WRIT PETITION (C) No.1350/ 2010. It is rnost respectfully subinitted as under: 0,4. h. f^ ^- \\ y' HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. N0.715 OF 2010 Petitioner Respondents Versus Trilochan Singh Chawala State of Chhattisgarh & Others APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OFW.P.(C) No. 1350/2010 (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Rajkamal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer forthe State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 08th day of December, 2010$ 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the counsel for the petitioner could not appear on account of bona fide mistake, therefore, W.P.(C)No.1350/2010, which was dismissed on 06.12.2010 may be restored to its file. 2. It appears that the petition was dismissed on account of mistake of the Advocate himself. This appiication has been filed immediately on the next date i.e. 7.12.2010. Though, it is weil settled that an application or petition etc. flled in the Court should not be supported by an affidavit of Advocate. However, in the facts of the case, where the mistake was on the part of the Advocate, and he has expressed regret, the above-stated requirement of filing of affidavit of the appiicant/petitioner in support of the application or petition ete. is dispensed with. 3. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P.(C) No. 1350/2010 is restored to the original file. 4. A copy of this order be placed on record of the original writ petition and the same be iisted for hearing. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ashok