Sngle o ) ya ’ IN THE HONBLE HIGHfiQOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT g‘ WRIT PETITION s NosL .2010 NO 1reh Sing Anlya son of Shri Sap Sing Anduya, aged aclul yes, Upper éivision ,Techer, Governmet Middle Schl, Lamna Block Podi—Uprodé stri Korba (c.G.) ' I§ LEJLI§ ,1 1‘2 Thrugh Secretaly, Triba Welfare Dortment K h‘éW R c D..s. BIan, aipur, (o) 2. ommissioner, Tribal Welfare eportment Raipur Dstrict Raipur (C.G.) i Assistant Cmission, Tril Welfare Deportment, Krba District Kora (C.G.) b i WRIT PETITION UNDER RTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PI ETITONER State of Chg hattisarh o l ep RESPONDENTS } A ” . . L . _ w 7,7 @ i Bnd: W iggLASPUR $Is h di wm h b 45 ar a n f oo Dict ; v C'D, omer . o ba 'HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPU WRIT PETITION (S) NO.2402.0F 2010 y PETITIONER Suresh Singh Andilya Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for ihe petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panei Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 7‘“ day of May, 2010) By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to pay two advance increments on passing of B.Ed. examination‘ on his own expenses, before entering into service. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present case is no Ionger res integra as the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena v. State of MP. a Orsl 3) Learned counsei further submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision in Asha Saxena (supra). Thus, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to decide his case in the light of aforestated decisions, subject to verification o'f the facts. 4) Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra), within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 5) ln view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 6) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. - Sd/— SAHSH K. AGNIHOTRLw Judge f” Amit 4 i 1 2009 (III) MPJR‘(SC) 59 R o