IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9926 of 2011 SATAN PASWAN SON OF RUDAL PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.4.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 20, 22, 23 and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. It is alleged that 30 Kgs. of Nepali Ganja was recovered from one Murari Das who was caught on chase. Subsequently apprehended accused named the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that from the First Information Report it appears that deliberately the name of the petitioner has been incorporated in the last portion of the First Information Report. This contention of the petitioner gets reflected from perusal of the F.I.R. It is further submitted that Murari Das in his confession has not named the petitioner though the Informant made the petitioner accused in the present case on the statement of Murari Das. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner keeping the view that the recovery has not been made from the petitioner and that Murari Das has not named the petitioner in his confession - 2 - then the accusation against the petitioner gets doubtful and dispose off the regular bail application without being prejudiced by the order of this court. With these observations, the application is disposed off. Let this order be communicated to the court of learned Sessions Judge, Bettiah, West Champaran in Kangali P.S. Case No. 31 of 2010 through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. Narendra/S. Ali ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. )