0gm7/ In the High Court of WP (S) - (“00> 96> / 2010 / CD Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur Petitioner Dhaniram Dewangan, 53 Yrs. S/ 0 Late Mansingh Dewangan, Boys’ Middle School, Vill. Gotatola, Block & Teh. Mahala, Rajnandgaon Respondents 1. "N KW Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Aadim Iati tatha Anusuchit Iati Vikas Vibhag, DKS Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur Commissioner, Aadim Iati tatha Anusuchit jati Vikas Vibhag, Distt. Rajnandgaon Joint Director, Treasury, Account & Pension V In-charge Distt. Rajnandgaon Block Education Officer, Block & Teh. Mahala, Distt. Rajnandgaon Writ Petition Under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITI*KER DIWAKER 02.12.2010 Shri Raja Shanna, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, GA. for the State. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of two advance inc rements on account of he having passed B.T.I. examination before h appointment at his own cost. It is submitted that the issue invoiv d in the present petition is no s been finally decided by the Asha Saxena Vs. State of M.P. longer res integm and the same Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case & 01$. 2009 (II!)MPJR (SC) 59. It is further submitted that t s Couxt has also taken a similar View in its order dated 6.2.2009 p ssed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the order dated é 294.2010 passed in Writ Appeal O. 124/2009, wherein relying upon the judgment of the Supreme t in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this rt in another Writ Appeal No. 8372009, directions have been issue for oonsideration of the ease for per circular dated 21.9. 1974 issued by the State of Madhya Prad sh, after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition. Counsel for the State submits hat case of the petitioners would also be considered on the sam lines. In View of above,/t{he;petition ‘s disposed of with a direction to i the respondent authorities to decide the claim of the petitioner for i grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21.9.1974 i grant of two advance increments i i i i l i a m u s " m m WI 200 mmmm WW w éamm issued by the State of Madhya Pra‘ pleaded in the petition within a peri‘ It is made clear that this C011 on merits 0f the case and thé authq ‘ to decide the same strictly in aoeordénce with law. sal— iesh after verification of the facts 3d of eight weeks from taday. zrt has mat expressed any opinion rity concerned Would be at iiberty / /, W -" Pr'xtinker Judge x (In? *ff’la’