IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL REVISION No. 104 of 2005 Dulal Vishwas .…. Revisionist Versus State of Uttaranchal & Others .… Respondents April 27, 2009 Mr. A.K. Agarwal, Adv. holding brief of Mr. Sudhir KUmar, Adv. for the revisionist. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for th State/respondent no. 1. e None for the respondent no. 3 & 4. HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. This criminal revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.4.2005 passed by Judge, Family Court, Udham Singh Nagar in case no. 162/2003, Smt. Shikha Vishwas & Anr. v. Dulal Viashwas under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., whereby learned Family Judge has awarded maintenance amounting to Rs. 800/- per month to respondent no. 3 and Rs. 400/- per month to respondent no. 2 from the date of making the application i.e. 24.9.2003. Thus, in total, revisionist has been directed to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 1200/-. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the revisionist and Brief Holder for the State/respondent no. 1 and perused the record. None appeared for the respondent no. 2 & 3 despite sufficient service. 3. Learned Counsel for the revisionist stated at bar that parties have entered into compromise and the compromise has been filed before the trial court. Hence, he does not press the revision as the same has been rendered infructuous and it may be dismissed as such. 4. In view of the above statement, the revision is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order dated 12.5.2005 stands vacated. (Dharam Veer, J.) 27.04.2009 PRABODH