IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 2ND JANUARY 2009 / 12TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 31372 of 2008(I) -------------------------- LAR.156/2000 of SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------ KUTTIERIPURATHU NARAYANI, W/O.LATE KUMARAN, RESIDING AT KOTTUR, SREEKANDAPURAM, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.O.V.MANIPRASAD RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), OECF, KANNUR. 3. THE PROJECT OFFICER, OECF, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, MALAPARAMBA, KOZHIKODE. ADV. SRI.BABU VARGHESE, SC, KWA FOR R3 GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 31372 OF 2008 (I) ==================== Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The application to set aside the ex-parte order was rejected by Exts. P3 and P4 orders passed by the Reference Court on the ground that cost was not paid. It is challenging these orders, the writ petition is filed. 2. This Court by its order dated 24/10/2008 initially directed the petitioner to pay Rs.2,500/- as cost. Subsequently, at the instance of the petitioner, that order was modified and the cost ordered to be paid was reduced to Rs.1,500/-. Twice adjournment was sought for complying with the said order. Even today, this order has not been complied with. 3. In the light of the consistent default that has been committed by the petitioner in complying with the orders passed by this court, the petitioner does not deserve any further indulgence in this matter. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp