/"_ <3D^ SIMtal.fc •!.••••• ?-"ki»^'v'^t'i IN HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISHGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. W.P. (S) No....;.?.f7^........2011 PETITIONER l\..- )..--'" j^i^ ^•-^^e-^i' \^-^ . "^^" ,^\"/ /Keshwar Ram Bhagat S/o Late Shri Mangru Ram Aged about 56 years, Assistant Engineer Water recourses department Sub Divisidn Dabhra District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) ,t-^^- •\ ^ 1. .2. ^, State of Chhattisgarh Through - the Secretary Water recourses Departnient D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Chief Engineer Hasdev Kachar Water recourses Department Bilaspur (C.G) Executive Engineer Water Recources Janjgir Division District Jajjgir Champa (C.G.) Rammani Garg S.D.0 Water recourses Departnient Sub Division Dabhra District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE U/A-226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR iffl •\\ ^'. '•'^1 ^^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (S) N0.1329 OF 2011 Keshwar Ram Bhagat Versus Stete of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Singte Bsnch : Kon'bie Shri Sstish K. ^nihotri, J. 'Present:- Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shr! Sushsl Dubey, Government Advocate for the State. 1. 4. iERjQRAD (Passsd on this 11"' day of March, 2011) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 30/12/2009 (Annexure P/1), the petitioner joined the new place of posting as Sub Dlvision OfRcer, Water Resources Sub-Division Dhabra, District-Janjgir. Thereafter, the petitioner was paid salary for about five months. Afterwards, no payment has made to the oetitioner till date. The Detitioner has made severat reoresentations before the authorities and it apDears that there is correspondence aoina on between the authorities. Without anv resuit,the petitioner has been denied his saiary for about eight months. Shri Dubey, leamed Government Advocate appearing for the State subm'rts that the representetion dated 7/2/2011 (Annexure P/5) and the earlier representations as stated by the petittoner, shaii be considered at the earliest in accordance with taw and the appropriate order for releasing salary of the petitioner, if acimissible, shall be passed within a period of four weeks. In view of the above, according to ieamed counssl appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication at this stage. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.No order asto costs. /' SatishK. AgBihotri