1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.496 of 2009 In Criminal Appeal No.71 of 2009 (Raju Baliram Uikey v. The State of Maharashtra) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri M.A. Bapat, Advocate for Applicant. Shri T.A. Mirza, APP for State. CORAM : A.H. Joshi & R.C. Chavan, JJ. DATE : 6th February, 2009 1. Heard. Perused the judgment. 2. Considering the circumstances, which led to the conviction, namely (i) dying declarations Exhibits 27 and 37 show that it was the son of Baliram Uikey who is author of injury sustained by deceased Chamarsay; (ii) death of Chamarsay is homicidal by proving post mortem report Exhibit 13; (iii) the FIR was registered immediately vide Exhibit 38 on the dying declaration of the deceased; (iv) there was a motive as proved by PW 6 and not disputed by defence that father of accused was killed by deceased; (v) discovery of knife and clothes of accused was at his instance after information given by him; and (vi) the discovered knife and clothes of accused were having blood of the group of deceased, we see no ground 2 for grant of bail. 3. The application for bail is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE JUDGE pdl