IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. 4021 of 2010. Decided on 22nd July, 2010. Madho Ram. ….. Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner. : Mr. Arush Matlotia, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- “(b) That the respondents be directed by a writ in the nature of mandamus, to regularize the services of the petitioner as Work Inspector with all consequential benefits flowing therefom retrospectively. 2. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the decision of this Court in Gauri Dutt and others Vs. State of H.P. Latest HLJ 2008 (HP) 366. Petitioner may file appropriate representation before the first respondent, producing copy of the judgment referred to above. In case of filing such representation, the matter shall be duly considered by the first 2 respondent and appropriate action, in accordance with law in the light of the judgment, referred above, and in view of any relevant material, shall be taken within a period of two months from the date of production of the copy of the judgment alongwith copy of the writ petition. 3. The petition stands disposed of, so as the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 22nd July, 2010 (bhupender/awasthi)