IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 13782 of 2008. Decided on 23.02.2011. _____________________________________________________ Raj Paul. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Trilok Jamwal, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. None for respondent No. 4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No. 4 to the post of Primary Assistant Teacher in Government Middle School, Diara. Mr. P.M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General has drawn the attention of the Court to the marks obtained by the petitioner and respondent No. 4, as contained in paragraph No. 6 (ii) of the reply filed on behalf of the respondent No. 3. The petitioner has secured 58.37 marks, whereas respondent No. 4 has secured 59 marks. Since the suitability of the petitioner and respondent No. 4 has been gone into by a duly constituted Selection Committee, this Court will not sit in appeal over the recommendations made by the same. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. Moreover, no malafides have been alleged against any member of the Selection Committee. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge February 23, 2011. (bhupender)