THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU W.P.NOS.24561, 24562 AND 24563 OF 2004 DATED: 19-10-2005 W.P.NO. 24561 OF 2005 BETWEEN: Madava Anil Babu .. Petitioner And The Sub Registrar,Narsipatnam and another . Respondents W.P.NO. 24562 OF 2005 BETWEEN: Kethineni Padma Rekha .. Petitioner And The sub Registrar, Narsipatnam and another .. Respondents W.P.NO. 24563 OF 2005 Between: G.Bhavani Prasad .. Petitioner And The Sub Registrar, Narsipatnam and another .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU W.P.NOS.24561, 24562 AND 24563 OF 2004 COMMON ORDER: These three writ petitions are filed questioning the action of the first respondent in keeping the documents presented for registration to him pending on the ground that he is not having information as to whether any appeal is preferred against the order granting pattas to the holders of pattas under Inams Abolition Act. Petitioners are purchasers of the land from the holders of pattas issued under the Inams Abolition Act. Letter dated 18.11.2000 produced by the petitioners, addressed by the Mandal Revenue Officer to the Sub Registrar, shows that no dispute is pending before the Commissioner, Survey, Settlement and Land Records regarding Inam lands of Kotha Yellavaram village and that pass books were issued to the persons mentioned therein in October, 2000. In view of Section 22(A) of Registration Act, first respondent cannot keep any document pending, when there is no notification issued by the State Government in the official gazettee, under that section, declaring registration of any document is opposed to public policy if such document, presented for registration, is in accordance with the Stamp Act and Registration Act. Therefore, with a direction to the first respondent to register the document presented for registration before it, if they are in accordance with the Stamp Act and Registration Act, and if there is no notification under Section 22 A of the Registration Act, with regard to the lands covered by the documents presented for registration, the writ petition is disposed of. Petitioners are entitled to costs of the petitions. ___________ 19-20-2005 kvrm