1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1054 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.906 OF 2006 Santosh Manohar Deshmukh ...Applicant (Orig.Accd.No.4) Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.R.D.Suryawanshi Advocate for the Applicant Mrs. A.S.Pai, Addl. P.P for the State CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. Dated : 22ND SEPTEMBER, 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard Mr. Suryawanshi, the learned Counsel for the applicant/accused No.4. In M.C.O.C. Special Case No.3/2002 all the 8 accused came to be tried and as per the judgment and order dated 17 th October, 2005 accused Nos.1 to 6 came to be convicted and sentenced for the offence punishable under Section 364A, 395, 397, 387 and 342 all read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In addition accused Nos.1 to 6 have also been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 3(1)(2), 3(2), 3(4) of the M.C.O.C. Act 2 and sentenced accordingly. Accused Nos.7 and 8 have been acquitted from all the offences. Accused Nos.1 to 6 remained as under-trial prisoners and Criminal Application No.967/2008 filed by accused No.2 for bail came to be rejected by this Court on 25 th September, 2008. Accused Nos.1 to 6 are in jail. We are also informed that the accused No.3 has filed Criminal Appeal No.1128/2005 and accused Nos.1,5 and 6 have filed Criminal Appeal No.157/2008. The office note also shows that the paper book is ready and thus the Appeals could proceed for hearing. 2.Hence the bail application is rejected. Criminal Appeal Nos.1071/2005, 1128/2005, 906/2006 and 157/2008 be added in the final hearing board. [SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.] [B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.]