1 wp11261-10.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.11261/2010. Gunai Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Kaulkhed Dist.Latur Through President .. Petitioner Vs The State of Maha. & Ors. .. Respondents. .... Shri P.G.Rodge,Adv.for petr. ShriK.G.Patil,AGP for State .... CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL & T.V.NALAWADE,JJ. DATE : 21/10/2011. 1] Heard. The petitioner-society was granted permission to start 5th to 7th standard classes as a special case alongwith two other such cases according to the counsel for petitioner. The petitioner prayed for release of grant at one and the same time for all the divisions which are being run for 5th to 7th standard classes. The learned A.G.P. submits that the grants in the case of the petitioner are being released phasewise. 2] The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for other two cases, the Government has released the grants at one and the same time but in case of petitioner, no grants are released. The learned A.G.P. submits that grants would be released for the academic years 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13 respectively, as a matter of policy. 2 wp11261-10.odt 3] In the facts of the case, we find that the State Government if had adopted policy in respect of providing grants in phased manner, then it shall be implemented uniformly. 4] The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in two such cases, the State Government had released grants at one and the same time. Though we have not examined the cases in respect of those two cases, but it is for the State Government to take into consideration the representation of the petitioner on that count. 5] We have perused the impugned communication dated 30/8/10. It is stated in the said communication that as a special case, permission was granted to Gunai Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Kawalkhed, Tq. Udgir, Dist.Latur to start classes from 5th to 7th standard. The said institution is already running 8th to 10th standard classes. According to the communication, in the academic year 2010-11, 5th standard classes would start, and as a natural growth, the next Divisions would start. In case the petitioner had started all the classes together, it would not be appropriate to direct the State Government in exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction to allocate grants at one and the same time. In the facts of this case, no interference is warranted. Petition is therefore, rejected. (T.V.NALAWADE,J.) (NARESH H.PATIL,J.) umg/wp11261-10