1 wp5278-2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5278 OF 2010 Smt.Sunita S. Sasawade & Ors. ...Petitioners vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Atul Damle i/b. Mr.Hemant P. Ghadigaonkar for the Petitioners. Mr.R.M. Patne, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 to 4. Mr.S.G. Surana for Respondent No.6. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 24, 2010 P.C. :- 1 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned Counsel for the 6th respondent, learned AGP for the 2nd to 4th respondents. 2 Challenge in this writ petition is to the order of eviction passed by the Deputy Collector in exercise of powers under Section 33/38 of the 2 wp5278-2010 Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as "the said Act"). The challenge is also to an order passed by the Administrator in appeal preferred by the petitioners confirming the order of eviction. 3 In the impugned order of the appellate authority, it is observed that the petitioners have been offered permanent accommodation in view of the eligibility as per Annexure-II. The learned Counsel appearing for the 6th respondent states that keys of flat no.603 in the Rehab building have already been handed over to the petitioners. The learned Counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the fact that the keys have been handed over. 4 The learned Counsel for the petitioners pointed out that there is no Occupation Certificate granted in respect of the said flat and there are leakages in the said flat through the ceiling and 3 wp5278-2010 side wall. The learned Counsel for the 6th respondent states that Occupation Certificate has been granted in respect of the flat and that the leakages are due to the fact that for last two years, the flat has not been occupied by the petitioners though it was ready and offered to the petitioners. 5 Suffice it to say that in view of handing over of the said flat no.603 to the petitioners, no case is made out for interfering with the order of eviction. If the petitioners have any grievance regarding the accommodation provided, it is for the petitioners to adopt appropriate remedy in that behalf. 6 Subject to what is observed hereinabove, no interference is needed. Writ Petition is disposed of. (A.S. OKA, J.)