1 CAR39.11 srp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2011 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 28 OF 2011 M/s. Tao Designs ... Appellant/Applicant Vs Space Matrix Design Consultants Pvt.Ltd. ... Respondent Dr. Birendra Saraf with Ms. Savani Gupte i/b Legasis Partners for the Appellant. Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. TUESDAY, 20TH DECEMBER, 2011 P.C.: 1. It is difficult for this Court to assess as to which of the parties is entitled to an award that may be declared by third parties for the works done. Essentially, it is for the party conferring the award to decide as to whether the appellant or the respondent ought to be conferred the award for the work. Similarly, if the respondent claims credit for the work done, it is for the party to whom such 2 CAR39.11 representation is made to decide whether the respondent ought to be given credit for the same or not. 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that he will inform the appellants within seven days of applying for any award in respect of the said work. The appellant is always at liberty to make its representation to the contrary before such party. 3. In a matter of this nature, no further interim orders are called for. 4. The Civil Application is, accordingly, disposed of.