HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Present : Cont. Petition NO.63 OF 2006. Mr. Abhishek Sharma and Shri Ashok Soni, iearned Advocates for the petitioner. The Contempt petition is misconceived and not maintainabie. ‘ The complaint, l couid gather from the teamed counsel for the petitioner, this Court passed the interim order of siatus quo on is that after 08.02.2006, certain persons, not parties to the interim writ order, have been quarrying minor minerals. i am at a loss to understand how the compiained action wouioi tantamount to oontempt on the part of those are not parties to the writ order. Therefore, they are not persons who bound by the interim order. tt cannot be said that by quarrying the mineral, they have committed any contempt of the Court. Contempt i \ sw— Chief Justice ORAL ORDER (Passed on 20’“ April, 2006) K i case is, a.ltherefore, dismissed. PETiTiONER Medan Gopat Rajput, aged about 52 years, son of Late KR. Rajput, resident of [Vi/22, Sector 1, Awanti Vihar, Raipur (C.G.) Vs. RESPONDENTS 1. Mr. Subodh Kumar. Coiiector, Distt. CONTEMNORS Raipur (C.G.) 2. Ram‘esh Sharma, Sab .Divisionai Officer, (Revenue), Sub Division Raipur (0G,) 3. r Kaiiash Verma, Naib Tahsitdar, Tah. ' Pirda, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 4. RS. Pisda, Mining Officer, Coiiectorate Raipur (C.G.) 5. Smt. Gubal Bai, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Pirda, Tah and Distt. Raipur (C.G.)