Crl. R No. 959 of 2008 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : January 27, 2011 1. Crl. R No. 959 of 2008 Jai Lal Singh vs The State of Haryana and another 2. Crl. R No.1001 of 2008 Vijender and others vs The State of Haryana and another, 3. Crl. Misc No. M 27977 of 2008 Giani Ram vs State of Haryana and others, *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for the petitioners in Crl. R Nos.959 and 1001 of 2008. Mr. S.S.Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner in Crl. Misc No.M 27977 of 2008/ for respondent No.2 in Crl. R Nos.959 and 1001 of 2008. Mr. Shalini Attri, DAG Haryana *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This order shall dispose of Crl. R Nos.959, 1001 of 2008 and Crl. Misc No. M 27977 of 2008. These petitions have been filed against the order dated 22.4.2008. Crl. R Nos.959 and 1001 of 2008 have been filed against the summoning of additional accused, while Crl. Misc No. M 27977 of 2008 Crl. R No. 959 of 2008 ::2:: has been filed against that portion of the order declining to summon some other additional accused. By the impugned order, the revisional Court has set aside the order of the trial Court and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. In my opinion, no fault can be found with the impugned order. However, I hesitate to give reasons as the same could prejudice the case of either party. In the circumstances, I find no patent perversity or apparent arbitrariness in the impugned order and dismiss these petitions with the clarification that the trial Court would decide the matter on its own merit. ( AJAY TEWARI ) January 27, 2011. JUDGE `kk'