ssagtE EERw « %mrgf \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (c.G) w.P. (S) No. rJpém /2o1o PETITIONER “g: 'Vishambharnath Mishra, aged about 69 years, S/o Shri Ramkishun Mishra, Retired Head Master, Govrnment Middle School Khutera, Block Patharia, Bilaspur (C.G.) R/o Village Dohatra, Post Mora, via Nandghat Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh / 1 . Th rough Secreta ry, School education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Public Instruction , Raipur (C.G.) Joint Director, Treasury, Account & Pension, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Bilaspur (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Patharia, District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA Gowri RESPONDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.7641 OF 2010 Vishambharnath Mishra Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Anup Mazumdar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. PETITIONER ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 3rd day of January, 2011) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to second kramonnati as per the circular dated 3-10—2008 and 11—1-2010 (Annexure — P/2 & P/3) after completion of 24’years of service. Learned counsel further submits that the issue involved in the present petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in RS. Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others7. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in State of Tripura and others v. K.K. Royz and the order passedby this Court in RS. Verma (supra), to which learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection. Accordingly, liberty sought for by the petitioner is granted to make a representation before the concerned authority. ln view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of. / as; .. 3.. \ Sh K Sdl’ . gg““‘Q‘Yi Al Sati \ ,\ ud e ; a ‘ WP No.2805 of2002 (decided on 29—8-2006) 2 2004 AIR scw 1 4