IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2009 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9267 of 2009(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.T.MOHAMMEDKUTTY HAJI PALLIYALITHODI HOUSE, PO CHAPPANANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM 2. TREASURER, M/S. POOVALLOOR KULAMB AYALKUTTAM, PONMALA, MELMURI, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.9267 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner's apprehension is that orders would be passed on the application filed by the 2nd respondent for variation of permit, without taking into account Ext.P1 objection filed by him. If as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P1 objection has been received, I see no reason why the same shall not be considered , when the application made by the 2nd respondent is taken up for consideration on 1.4.2009. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the Ist respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/