IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18337 of 2010 AWADHESH MAHTO Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------- 3/ 25.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Demand, if any, is not continuation of the marriage rather after several years of the marriage, it is said that the same was demanded for running a business but reality is that she left the matrimonial house, deserted the petitioner and to fulfill some illegal demand, this case is lodged. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Baruraj P.S. Case No. 44 of 2009 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1397 of 2009 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., West, Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)