a "^. 1p- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI86ARH, BII-^POR W.P.(81No;5l37/2007 FBTKFlOflKR RE8PONDENTS Aakalaha Ram Gond, Soa of Late SIm Kejlirs^ <3oad, ^ed about 60 yeara, Resident pf Vil^e BUofhli, TahsaaQdDistrictDhamtaEi(G.G.) Versus 1. State of GUhattiisgarh, Through: The Secretaty, Water Resources Departinent, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raqmr(C.G.) 2. Tfae Sub Divisional Qfficci, Mahaaadi Shirsha Jal Prabandh, Sub Division No.l Rudri, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 3. The Executive Eiigmeer, Mahaaaxli Water Mauageineut Dam., Sub Division No.l Rudxi, District Dhamtaii(C.G.) WRIT PBTmoWOTnDBR ARTICLB 226 OF THE COWB'IiqOT'MOirOIMNIMA ApeearMtCe: Sbri P.P. Sahu, Counsel&r fhe petitioner. SUri N.K. Ap'awal, Seiuor Advocate and Depuly Adyocate Gcneral wifh Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Govt. Advocate fQr fhe State/respoiidents. ORALtMtDBR (31.10.2007) STOHL KUMAR 8IMHA. J. Heard. ' ..-.'•' .. . . Learaed cozuisel for the petitioaer subnuts that a permaaent Gaiig-maa is to be retired at the age of62 years ia aGcordaace witb ;~ the Chhattisgwh Slwskiya Sevcik (Adhiva.Tshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam 1967y, read wifh Fundamental Rules, 56. He also submfts fhat fhe poiat raised has beeri decidedbyfhisGourtiutoatchafmatteEsi.e.W.P.No.l08/a)05 and mauyofher ccmiiectcdmattersoa 04.0t.2CK)7,re 3007 f21 C^SJ^J. 39 lOooin&aaOthers Vs. Slwte afC.Q.eattt ctfteral and this inatter is squaryy covercd Uy tttat <iecisi0(n. wluch may be dispc^ed ofoathie same lenns. SSSiSSSwKii"^ W.P.(S)No.5I37/2007 Learaed coiinsel for fhe State feirly ^rees tfaat this matter is covered by tliesajd decision. However, he s'ubinits tfaat in soiae inatters fhe State has filedwnt appeals, Uiiless some interun order is passed, inerefy onaccoitutof filing of fhe writ appeal, heariug of thls writ petltion caanot be kept in abeyancs, when the tnatter is squarely coiveted by the said judgnient In theiesult, this petition is aBoiwed. It is disposed of in tenns oftihfi order dated 04.01;20Q7 passed in W.P. No. 108/2005 and ofhsiLcoimected matters. No order as to cost. Kaol Sh^a r^ ^