1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 461 of 2001 (Pennar Alluminium Co. Ltd. Vs. Jitesh Premdas Gajbhiye) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. H. V. Thakur, Adv. for the petitioner. CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATE : 18 th October, 2008 Perused the Counsel Note Stamp No. 10721/2008 filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is stated in the Counsel Note that the counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had issued a notice dated 10/9/2008 by Registered Speed Post, informing the petitioner Company about the intention of the counsel to withdraw the appearance from the writ petition on behalf of the petitioner Company. It is further stated in the Note that the envelop containing the notice was received back unserved with an endorsement “Left”. A copy of the said envelop is annexed to the Counsel Note. Under the aforesaid circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner desire to withdraw their appearance 2 and Vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner- Company, from the case. The counsel for the petitioner are hereby permitted to withdraw their appearance and Vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner- Company from this case. A perusal of Annexure-B to the Counsel Note, a copy of the envelop with a postal endorsement “Left” clearly, shows that the office of the petitioner is now not located at the address stated in the petition. In this background, no purpose would be served by issuing a notice to the petitioner on engagement of another counsel as this Court would not be in a position to find out the new address of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE RMP