S) ^S^<y»&»A- wa-^'y' . £„ ^ofl1'--- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. 2006 PETITIONERS ^^ :^^:^»y ^^).^ •^.^ 1. Malikram Nag, S/o Shri Suklal Naig, aged about 40 years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School- Pilwapali, Block - Basna, Distt. - Mahasamund (C.G.) 2. Narsingh Khunte, S/o. Shri Rikhi Ram Khunte, aged about 39 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School - Kandadongar, Block-Basna, Distt. - Mahasamund (C.G.) 3. Shauki Lal Ratde, S/o. Shri Rohit Das Ratde, aged about 37 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Girl's Primary School - Rasoda, Block - Basna, Distt. - Mahasamund (C.G.) 4. Samaru Lal Chauhan, S/o. Shri Girdhar Chauhan, aged about 36 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School - Bhaunradadar Block - Basna, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) 5. Bhanupratap Sidar, S/o. Shri Vasudev Sidar, aged about 36 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Boys Primary Schoo! Aanwlachakar, Block- Saraipali, Distt. - Mahasamund (C.G.) Smt. Kavita Chauhan, W/o. Shri Premlal Chauhan, aged about 35 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School- Paterapali, Block - Saraipali, Distt. - Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 2. State ofChhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary Department of Education/Tribai Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Public Instruction Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur 3. District Education Officer, Distt. - Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^6 OF THE CONSTITUT1QN OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. HI6H COURT OF OWATTISeAfW AT BIUtSPUR W. P. ts) No. 7373/ 2006 , Petitioners : Surendra Kumor Vishat and others Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh cnd others W. P. fel No. 7384/ 2006 Petitioners : Naroywr Prasad Suryavanshi & o-Hiers Versus Respondents : Storte of Chhatt-isgarh nnd others And W. P. fsVNo. 7390/2006 Petitioners : Malikrom Nag and o-ttiers Versus Respondents : 5tate of Chhath'sgarh and others SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Mr. Anll Shi^i Rajput, Advocate for thepetitioner(s). Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, ©ovemmentAdvocate for the respondents/State. Oft b E R (Possed on •this 5th doy of J<inu<»ry,2007) The fotlowin9 order of •Hie Court' is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri. J. 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioners cs well as leamed Sovemment Advocate appearing for the respondents/Stute jointly submit -that -the facts of the present coise are similar to that of in W. P. (S) No. 5191 of 2006 frlari Prosad Kurre and o-rtiers Vs. State of Chh<rttis9<irh & o-thers), whidi wos di^osed of vide ordar dated 3 of Qctober, 2006. They further submit that the question of law involved is also •the same. Subhnsh 2. In view of -the nbove stated submissions made by leaaned counsel for the pcrties, the petitions are disposed of 'm terms of the order Arted 3rd of Octobar, 2006 yssswS, by -this Court in W. P. (S) No. 519t of 2006. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of Ihis order be ploced on record in o-ther connected writ petition. Sd/- SatishKAgnlhotri Judge