CgwéM‘ gN THE HIEH I” U3 ‘1‘ LHI‘hTTI GAhu fa'f bImmPUR.,/ ‘WRTLT PETITIUN NO. i g/g OF 2003. 4:: T1 TION ER‘ R§m rashan $ahu, S/o S} i Heera Lai Sahu, d about Age 31 years, ¢ J aachayat xxar u, Gram Panchayd& Podl “hankar, Ja pad Panchayat Eamha idih9 District Janjgeer-Chamga, {c.Ga')“ k; Im m Itr {C iv z signe of chhat 1ggar1 fnrough z ihtz .gbcretary, yancha'ya't and Rural Develop.- mant , Departmen%, D.&.S. Bhawan, 3gipur, (C.G.). y” The Co lie c tor , yanjgeer—Champa, (c,g_), The Prescribed Authori€y Unéer $he Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993. 2G 3° Janpad Panchayat, Eamhahidih, Thxough The Chief Execuiive Gfficer, Distxict Janjgeerm [u —. \ Chemp‘c‘m, Rub.“ 4‘§ Gram Fanchayat, Podi Sha§kar, inlauoh : The $ecretary, Janyua Panchayat Eamhanidih, District Janjgeex~Champa, ($43. ). can tdo .2 M§ - fOw P. msw 3 yJ£H,Kn5wn Bu mQoymrw L: zr$ w 03mEUmv a“, mB w ‘JHocn nuUCQ n L3,- hm; ‘J Frbt r mrm<mr. FEnv mkm;m9, r0. J r“. ‘ ‘ w Emma gmE wmSnvw m ha? 5 .? w. Cwnwagn gm ca awm$H5 5 nsmgf L, m5.ammHxamwEvm ‘ ‘EiEwoMy ammpgmog w 5 q“: . Qmua’iu Uri m 3 W HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR single Bench. Hon’ble shri Satish K Agnihotri J. W.P. No. 186 of 2003 Petitioner : Ram Kishan Sahu. Versus Respondents State of C.G. and others. Shri Rajesh Pandey, cauhsel for the petitioner. _ Shri Sumit Verma, Panel lawyer for the State. Shri Rajendm Tn'pathi, counsel for the respondent No.4. ORAL ORDER (14m June, 2006) I. LA. No. 5439,! 2006, this is an applicatioxl for withdrawal of the petition, to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection. The application is allowed 2. Consequently, the writ pen'tiou is dismissed as WithdIaWn. / No order as to costs. Saush Kn Agnihom // Judge new“ {77 l .