IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 28TH MAY 2009 / 7TH JYAISHTA 1931 RP.No.420 of 2009 --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WP(C).37498/2008 Dated 24/03/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------- 1. THE FLAG OFFICER, COMMANDING-IN-CHIEF, NAVAL BASE, KOCHI. 2. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, NEW DELHI. 3. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, COMMAND STADIUM, NAVAL BASE, KOCHI. BY MR.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, ASST.SOLICITOR GENERAL. RESPONDENT/PETITIONER ------------------------- K.M.KALA, COMMAND STADIUM LABOURER (SAFFAIWALA), NAVAL AIRCRAFT YARD, KOCHI. BY MR. M.C. NAMBIAR, ADVOCATE. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------------ Review Petition No.420 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) No.37498 OF 2008 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of May, 2009. O R D E R This review petition is filed by the respondents in the writ petition. As per the interim order, this Court has already directed that the claim of the petitioner for decent wages at the minimum scale of pay will be considered by the first respondent and appropriate orders shall be passed within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. 2. In the review petition, it is pointed out that the assertion made by the petitioner before this Court that the petitioner is being paid Rs.400/- as wages is not correct and that she is being paid wages at the rate of Rs.1,000/- from August 2008 onwards. This Court has not adjudicated anything regarding the rates of wages that is being paid by the respondents to the petitioner. In the interim order this Court has only mentioned the submission by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner that she was being paid at the rate of Rs.400/- as wages. R.P. No.420/2009 2 Therefore, it is upto the respondents to comply with the interim order as per the directions and pass appropriate orders. The review petition is therefore without any merit and the same is dismissed. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp