IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.50 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3453 OF 1991 Mohamedali Gulam Rasool Shaikh & Ors. ...Petitioners V/s. The Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Asif Ali Siddiquie for Petitioners. Mr.Milind More, A.G.P. for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 4, 2009. MARCH 4, 2009. MARCH 4, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. The sole ground on which I am inclined to allow this Review Petition is that I am in agreement with the argument of the Counsel for the Petitioners that the Writ Petition ought to have proceeded before the Division Bench having regard : 2 : to the nature of relief claimed therein and could not have been dealt with by the Single Judge as has been done in terms of order dated 21st January 2008. The fact that this cardinal aspect has been overlooked by the Court or not raised by the Respondents during the argument or insisted by the Petitioners, does not take the matter any further. The matter has to proceed in accord with the Original Side Rules which obligates hearing of Writ Petition purely for relief of mandamus without challenging any order passed by the quasi judicial authority to be heard by the Division Bench alone. 3. In the circumstances, the order dated 21st January 2008 is recalled and reviewed. Instead, Writ Petition is restored to the file to be proceeded before the Division Bench. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.