Crl. Misc. No. M-5433 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-5433 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 26.8.2010 Gurbhag Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Tejinder Pal Singh, Advocate for Mr. Mohit Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Malik, AAG, Haryana. Mr. A.S. Sullar, Advocate for respondent No.3. Rajan Gupta, J. (oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.146 dated 8th October, 2008, under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Mullana, District Ambala on the basis of compromise. Mr. Sullar, who has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.3, submits that in fact there is no compromise between the parties. According to him, wrong statement has been made before this court with regard to compromise between the parties. Learned State counsel points out that the case is now fixed before the trial court for prosecution evidence for 13.9.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the aforesaid factual averments. Crl. Misc. No. M-5433 of 2009 2 A perusal of the order dated February 26, 2009 shows that notice of motion was issued in this case only for the reason that quashing of FIR was sought on the basis of compromise stated to have arrived at between the parties. In view of the fact that compromise has been specifically denied by the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3, there is no merit in this petition. The same is hereby dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 26.8.2010 'rajpal'