Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr.M.P.(M) No.276 of 2009. Dated of Decision: April 27, 2009. Buli Chand. …..… Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. ……. Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Chandernarayan Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. Surinder Singh, J (oral): The petitioner is apprehending his arrest from the police in case FIR No.161/08 dated 22.9.08, registered under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code, in Police Station Karsog. Heard and gone through the report. Precisely, the facts are that on 22.9.08, house of Smt. Premavati, complainant was burgled by some one. On coming to know, she found that her ornaments, Black & White T.V., one sewing machine and some vessels worth Rs.32,000/- were missing. Thereafter, the police arrested Yog Raj, Nek Chand and Gita Ram. It is alleged that during the interrogation of Gita Ram, he made a statement that two Black 2 & White T.Vs., one sewing machine and some vessels were sold to the present petitioner who was working in Home Guard Department at Sunni, for Rs.3,000/-. The house of the petitioner was raided by the police, but nothing was recovered. Pursuant to the last order, he had joined the investigation of this case. On consideration of the matter in the circumstances aforesaid, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required, thus, the petitioner can be enlarged on bail. The interim bail granted on 21.4.2009 is hereby confirmed on the same conditions and also with a further condition that the petitioner shall keep on joining the investigation of this case whenever required by the police in this case and shall present in the court whenever required to do so. Application stands disposed of. April 27, 2009. (Surinder Singh) (Pds) Judge.