IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1652 (SS) of 2007 Gulbeer Singh, S/o Sri Prabhu Singh, R/o Jagatpura Gali No. 5, Rudrapur, District‐ Udham Singh Nagar. ………Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary, Home Department, Civil Secretariat, Dehradun. 2. Inspector General of Police, PAC, District‐ Dehradun. 3. Deputy Inspector General, PAC. 4. Commandant, 46th Battalion, PAC Task Force, Rudrapur, Udham Singh Nagar. ……..Respondents. Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Heard Sri S.S. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Paresh Tripathi, learned Brief Holder for State of Uttarakhand on behalf of respondents. Brief facts of the case as narrated in the writ petition are that petitioner was appointed as Constable in the year 1982. On 05.10.1994 petitioner was dismissed from service. Against the dismissal order petitioner filed Departmental Appeal, which was rejected on 30.04.1996. Against the order dated 30.04.1996, petitioner filed claim petition before Public Service Tribunal. Public Service Tribunal on 29.05.2003 dismissed the claim petition of the petitioner. Aggrieved with the order dated 29.05.2003 petitioner preferred writ petition before this Hon’ble Court. This court on 17.04.2006 partly allowed the writ petition of the petitioner. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in compliance of the Court’s order petitioner was reinstated in the service but he is getting lower scale of salary. In this regard petitioner has already moved representation before respondent no. 4, which is still pending. During the course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer that writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 4 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 07.05.2007 (Annexure no. 3 to the writ petition) within a particular period. The prayer is innocuous. Accordingly, I direct the respondent no. 4 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 07.05.2007 (Annexure no. 3 to the writ petition) in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With this direction, writ petition as well as interim relief application is finally disposed of. No order as to costs. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J) November 15, 2007 SKS