IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22123 of 2009 1. UTTAM MANDAL, SON OF YOGI MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALRAMPUR, P.S. AMDABAD, DISTRICT KATIHAR. 2. PAPPU MANDAL, SON OF BAIJNATH MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAMAYANPUR (GOLAGHAT), P.S. AMDABAD, DISTRICT KATIHAR. ---- PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---- OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 4 11.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In this case this Court had called for the case diary and also for the inquest report. The boy is said to have been missing from 25.7.2008. The dead body was recovered on 4.8.2008 for which a U.D case was lodged. Later on a complaint case was lodged on 29.8.2008. Counsel for the informant submits that the earlier information was given to the police regarding the involvement of the petitioners. However, the police did not institute a case and thereafter the present complaint has been filed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it is only on the basis of statement and after great delay this case has been instituted. However, considering the fact that there is a prompt action against these petitioners, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to these petitioners. This application is dismissed. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)