THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Civil Revision Petition No.2236 of 2010 ORDER: This civil revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the docket order dated 28.05.2010 passed in I.A.No.363 of 2010 in O.S.No.75 of 2010 on the file of the Vacation Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, whereunder the learned Judge ordered notice to the respondents in the I.A. Petitioner herein- M/s. Perfect Knitters Limited rep. by its authorized representative Mr. P. Chittibabu, filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their agents and men from preventing or obstructing the entry and exit of the officers, employees and staff of the plaintiff into and from out of the factory premises at D.No.6-56/6/1, Industrial Estate, Balanagar, Ranga Reddy District, and for other allied reliefs. The petitioner has also filed the present I.A. seeking temporary injunction as an interim measure. Since the suit was filed during Summer Vacation, it was posted before the Vacation Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, who, having noted that a caveat was filed in the matter by Perfect Knitters Workers Union, held that the respondents have to be heard before passing any orders in the I.A. and accordingly ordered notice to the respondents. Aggrieved thereby, the present civil revision petition is filed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Union which has filed caveat in the suit is, in fact, not a party defendant to the suit and the learned Vacation Civil Judge failed to take note of the same and issued notice to the respondents, based on that caveat, ignoring the fact that there is urgency to pass orders in the I.A. He further submits that after summer vacation, the suit was transferred to the Court of S.C. S.T.-cum-Special Judge, Ranga Reddy District, and renumbered as O.S.No.321 of 2010 and so the interlocutory application as I.A.No.158 of 2010, and as of now, there is no Presiding Officer for the said Court and the Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District, is in-charge of the said Court. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. A perusal of the material papers reveals that the Union who filed caveat is not a party to the suit and based on that caveat the learned Judge ought not to have ordered notice to the respondents. Further, the matter is with regard to the business activities of the petitioner firm and, therefore, I am of the considered opinion that there is urgency involved in the matter to pass orders in the present I.A., by considering the matter on its own merits with the material available on record. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the civil revision petition directing the Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District, to consider the present I.A. filed by the petitioner, on its own merits and pass appropriate orders expeditiously. The civil revision petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 10th June 2010 IBL