IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.40193 of 2008 ASHA DEVI @ SONAPATI KUER Vrs. THE STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 17.09.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner. 2. Prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner, Asha Devi @ Sonapati Kuer, was earlier considered on merit and it was allowed to be withdrawn considering prayer made on behalf of the petitioner’s counsel. 2. Now, again, for similar relief this anticipatory bail application has been filed, which is not maintainable, as such, it is rejected. 3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to deposit the entire alleged defalcated amount. If that is so, she can do and if the petitioner moves for regular bail the Court concerned will decide the case on it’s own merit without being prejudiced of this order. S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )