IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1741 of 2010 ABDUL HAKIM @ HAKIM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 12.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence of the petitioner in a Police case under Sections 15,18, 25 and 28 of the N.D.P.S. Act is that he is not named in the F.I.R. Learned counsel for the State points out from the case diary that the petitioner is alleged to be in tandem with the named accused Azad cultivating opium in the field. The prayer for bail of Azad has been rejected twice by this Court. The application is rejected. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)