IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9288 of 2008. Decided on: 30.11.2010. __________________________________________________________ Laskari Ram. … Petitioner. Versus H.R.T.C. and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Petitioner was appointed as driver in the respondent- Corporation on 1st January, 1990. He was retired on medical grounds vide Annexure A-2, dated 23rd April, 1994. Thereafter he got treatment and was issued medical fitness certificate by the A.M.O., Shri Rattan Muni Jain Government Ayurvedic Hospital, District Hamirpur, H.P. on 23rd September, 2002. Petitioner has made a representation to consider his case for re-employment after being declared medically fit vide Annexure A- 3. However, till date no decision has been taken by the respondents on the representation made by him for his re-employment. Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents has vehemently argued that in the intervening period his wife has been provided part-time employment. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. Since the petitioner has been declared medically fit as per Annexure A-3, dated 23rd September, 2002, the petition is disposed of with a direction to second respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for re-employment in accordance with law and for that purpose a Medical Board shall be constituted by moving application to the Chief Medical Officer, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, Shimla, if necessary. This be done within a period of one month after production of certified copy of the judgment. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 30, 2010. (sck).