1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1181 OF 2009 IN APPEAL NO.263 OF 2008 Saherao Lukdu Jadhav .... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent Mr.Tushar Sonawane, for the applicant. Mr.D.P.Adsule, APP, for the State. CORAM :P.B.MAJMUDAR, & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 29th JANUARY, 2010 P.C. 1. Since the earlier Bench by its order dated 28-04-2008, has rejected application for bail on merits, we do not find any justification to entertain this subsequent application for bail. The earlier Bench has also found that in view of the evidence on record, it would not be a fit case for granting bail. Considering the fact that there is a conviction based evidence of eye witness, we reject the prayer for bail. 2. Since the appeal is of 2008, at present there is no question of giving any priority to this appeal by fixing the same for hearing. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that since applicant’s wife is required to undergo a surgery, he would like to apply for temporary bail. 2 On this aspect, we would not like to express any opinion, and as and when such application for temporary bail would be preferred by the applicant/accused, it will be decided on its own merits. 3. Subject to what is stated above, criminal application is dismissed. ( R.G.KETKAR, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)