1 MNM IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4685 OF 2006 Vidhyavardhini & Anr. ...Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar for Petitioners Mr. P.P. Kakade, A.G.P for Respondent 1 & 2 Mr.M.L.Patil for Respondent 3 CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI & SHRI. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: 5TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. 1. This petition is not on board for final hearing. Civil application is placed before us for final hearing. However, by consent of the parties we take the petition for final hearing. 2. We have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.P for respondent 1 & 2 and learned Counsel for respondent 3. 2 3. In this petition the petitioner has made the following prayer:- b) By a suitable Writ, Order or direction this Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned note below Order dated 18/5 / 2005 (Exhibit- N) issued by Respondent No.2 by which the Respondent No.2 has directed the Petitioners to pay salary to Respondent No.3 from 13/6 / 2001, and accordingly the Respondent No.2 be directed to release grant in aid for payment of salary to Respondent No.3 as Assistant Teacher in Petitioner No. 2 Junior College from 13/6 / 2001 onwards. 4. Mr. Kakade, learned A.G.P on instructions from Mr. S.K.Rathod , Assistant Depty Education Inspector, Mumbai states that the 2nd respondent accepts that approval is given to the post of the 3 rd respondent with effect from 13 th June 2001 and the 2nd respondent shall reimburse the amount of salary which is already paid by the petitioner to the 3rd respondent from 13 th June 2001 till June 2005. 5. Needless to say that so far as the salary of the 3rd respondent from July 2005 is concerned the petitioner/management shall submit the salary bills to the 3 2 nd respondent and the 2nd respondent shall pay that amount to the 3 rd respondent. This submission is recorded and accepted by this Court. 6. The reimbursement to the management and payment of the arrears of salary to 3rd respondent be made within 12 weeks from today. 7. In view of the statement made by the learned A.G.P the petition has worked itself out and hence it is disposed of. Needless to say the civil application also stands disposed of. 8. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (SHRI. J.P. DEVADHAR J.)