IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1104 of 2008 PRAMOD SINGH & ANR Versus RAGHUNATH PRASAD GUPTA ----------- 2. 4.8.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the grievance of the petitioner with regard to not deciding the objection filed by the petitioner on the report of the Pleader Commissioner appointed by the court seems to be wholly misconceived inasmuch as the court below in the impugned order has recorded that after submission of the report of the Pleader Commissioner he was yet to be examined in the court. To that extent the court below was absolutely justified in postponing such prayer of the petitioner for deciding his objection on the report of the Pleader Commissioner, but this Court cannot approve that part of the order of the court below wherein it has disposed of the application of the petitioner seeking appointment of a second Pleader Commissioner which will mean rejection of such prayer of the petitioner. The court below in fact was required to consider such prayer of the petitioner after deciding the objection of 2 the petitioner on the report of the first Pleader Commissioner. In that view of the matter, this Court would direct that after the Pleader Commissioner is examined and cross-examined by the petitioner, the court below will be required to pass an order with regard to the objection raised by the petitioner in his two applications dated 13.5.2007 and 4.6.2007 and in the event the objection of the petitioner is upheld it would proceed to examine and consider the prayer of the petitioner for appointment of a second Pleader Commissioner. With the aforementioned observations and directions this application is disposed of. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/