1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11048 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2125 OF 1996 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s | orders orders | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. R.P. Phatake, A.G.P. for applicant. Mr. S.R. Barlinge, Advocate for respondent. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, AND S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 14TH JANUARY, 2010 We are not convinced with the explanation offered to condone the delay of 1329 days. As a matter of fact, a vague statement is made that time was taken because of the internal department correspondence and also because of the workload. Even if in cases pertaining to the Government, the Court would take liberal view of the matter. However, from the application as filed before us, we see no propriety in condoning the 2 delay of around 1329 days. Hence the Civil Application is rejected. 2. In view of this order, Review Petition be consigned to the record, as nothing survives therein. ( S.S. SHINDE, J. ) (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.) sut/JAN10/ca11048.06