..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2818 OF 2008 Ambadas Damu Jadhav @ Suryawanshi ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Mr.Pradip Kolkar, Adv. a/w. Mr.Sachin Pawar, Adv. for the appicant. Mr.Rajesh More, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 27th August, 2008. DATED : 27th August, 2008. DATED : 27th August, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.494 of 2007 of Pimpri Police Station,Pune. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicant submitted that co-accused Anand Vitthal Shinde has been granted bail by this Court and the case of the applicant is similar as that of co-accused Anand Vitthal Shinde. This statement has not been ..(2).. controverted by the prosecution. Hence, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant on the ground of parity. 4. The applicant - Ambadas Damu Jadhav @ Suryawanshi to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rs.Thirty Thousand Only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant shall report to Pimpri Police Station, Pune once in a week, till conclusion of the trial. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)