BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eleventh day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos.14335, 14339, 14347, 14338, 14349, 14364 & 14374 of 2011 1. MADURAIVEERAN @ JEEVA 2. SELVARAJ 3. GURUVAN 4. KARUPPIAH :PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN IN CRL.O.P.(MD) NOS.14335, 14347, 14338, 14349, 14364 & 14374/11 5. MUTHU @ PARUTHIVEERAN : PETITIONER/ACCUSED IN CRL.O.P.(MD) NO.14339/11 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUMANGALAM TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. CRIME NOS.146/2011, 343/2008, 366/2011, 401/2011, 179/2011, 369/2011 & 321/2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT IN ALL THE PETITIONS For Petitioner : M/S.JOHN STEPHEN Advocate in all the Petitions For Respondent : Mr. K.S.DURAIPANDIAN Additional Public Prosecutor in all the Petitions PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest, the petitioners, in Crime Nos.146/2011, 343/2008, 366, 401, 179, 369 and 321 of 2011 on the file of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 394, 392, 379 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code respectively, have come forward with these Petitions seeking for anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners 2 to 4 are not an accused. In view of the said submissions, these petitions are dismissed in respect of the petitioners 2 to 4. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that one accused, by name Paruthiveeran was arrested and on his confession, it has come to light that these petitioners are involved in all these cases. He would further submit that if anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioners, the further investigation would be hampered with and the custodial interrogation is very much required. 5. I have considered the above submissions. 6. As of now, according to the prosecution, it has come to light that the petitioners are involved in 7 cases. It appears that the petitioners are involving in such crimes continuously. If the petitioners are arrested and subject to custodial interrogation, further progress could be made in the investigation and their involvement in any other case could be culled out. If really, they have involved in other cases, the custodial interrogation is so much required. Considering the gravity of the offences continuously said to have committed by the petitioners, I am of the view that the petitioners are not entitled for anticipatory bail. 7. Hence, these Petitions are dismissed. Sd/- 11/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUMANGALAM TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. ORDER IN Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos.14335, 14339, 14347, 14338, 14349, 14364 & 14374 of 2011 Date :11/11/2011 NSV/15.11.11/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/