1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT J O D H P U R ::: ORDER In S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.3595/2009 Naimudin Kureshi v. State of Rajasthan ::: Date of Order: 16th July, 2009 ::: P R E S E N T HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr Vipin Mankad, for the petitioner Mr Anees Bhurat, Public Prosecutor for the State ::: By the Court: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the relevant material/case diary made available to me during the arguments of the case. It is contended on behalf of petitioner that co-accused persons have already been granted bail under sec.439 CrPC by this Court in S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.3120/2009 on 15th July, 2009 by a detailed order, including one contention that the parties have entered into a compromise and case of present petitioner is similar with the co-accused persons, who have been granted bail by this Court. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any 2 of 2 opinion on its merits and demerits, I think it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner, namely, Naimudin Kureshi s/o Ahmad Hussain on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in F.I.R. No.225/2009, Police Station- Hiran Magri, District- Udaipur, registered under secs.147, 148, 323, 450, 307/149, IPC, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) together with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. This bail application is allowed accordingly. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. mma