IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33819 of 2010 MRITUNJAY GAUTAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 03.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that due to typing mistake, paragraph-11 has wrongly been typed in this bail petition. So he be permitted to delete the aforesaid paragraph. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, paragraph- 11 of the bail petition stands deleted. Admittedly, at the relevant time, the petitioner being Mukhiya issued a certificate in favour of co-accused. The genuineness of the aforesaid certificate is not in question; rather the informant has challenged the authority of the petitioner and doubted that the petitioner issued the said certificate for his wrongful gain. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within 30 days from receipt of the order, the petitioner, Mritunjay Gautam shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Fulwaria P.S. Case No. 08 of 2009 to the satisfaction of 2 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)