IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3987 of 2007 GURUSHARAN YADAV son of Rajbanshi Yadav, resident of village Kukribigha, P.S. Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD through its Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. The Director of Accounts, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 4. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Magadh Electric Supply Area, Gaya. 5. The Deputy Director of Accounts, Magadh Electric Suply Gaya. 6. The Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Area, Gaya. 7. The Electrical Elective Engineer, Electric Supply, Jehanabad . 8. The Assistant Electric Engineer, Electric Supply Sub-Division, Makhdumpur, Jehanabad. ----------- 2 10.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Akhilesh Kumar learned A.C. to Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh learned counsel for the electricity Board. The petitioner superannuated from the post of unskilled Khalasi with effect from 30.9.2006 has filed the writ petition for payment of his post retiral dues relating to G.P.F., gratuity, leave encashment, general insurance and pension. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Electricity Board and in paragraph No.5 thereof it is stated that the - 2 - gratuity amount, G.P.F. amount, leave encashment amount and the amount towards group savings has since been paid to the petitioner. The counter affidavit however, is silent in so far as the claim of pension of the petitioner is concerned. Having regard to the circumstances that most of the retiral dues as found admissible to the petitioner has since been paid to him, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the same pending and is disposed of with the direction to the respondent No.2, the Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board to ensure the payment of pension of the petitioner together with arrears within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The petitioner if feels aggrieved by any of the calculation of dues as set out in the counter affidavit, may file his claim petition together with supportive details and documents and which would also be considered by the respondent, Secretary within the same period and disposed of in accordance with law. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J. )