-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6177 OF 2005 Mrs. Mandakini Guruling Govasane...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtara & Ors..Respondents Mr. A.K. Suryawanshi, for the Petitioner Mr. P.I. Khemani, for the respondents. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DATE : DATE : DATE : 10TH OCTOBER, 2005 P.C.: . The transfer of the petition was effected on administrative grounds. The learned Tribunal after considering the grounds has chosen not to interfere. We have perused the impugned order and the record. From the reasoning given in para.6 we find that the Tribunal addressed itself to the correct question. The impugned order does not suffer from any error apparent. No interference called for. Petition rejected. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)