IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.178 OF 2006 IN APPEAL NO.28 OF 2006 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3531 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO.3487 OF 2004 Mrs.Veena Kantilal Kenia & Anr. ..Appellants. (Orig.Plaintiffs) Vs. Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. & Anr. ..Respondents. (Orig.Defendants) Mr.Y.R. Shah for the Appellants. Mr.P.Shinde i/b.M/s.M.Dhruva & Co. for Respondent No.1. Mr.Samir Vaidya for Respondent No.2. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED: 13TH MARCH, 2006 DATED: 13TH MARCH, 2006 DATED: 13TH MARCH, 2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : Heard the learned counsel for the Appellants and the Respondents. 2. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of the ad-interim relief granted on 4th November, 2005. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) : 2 : (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)