IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 23RD KARTHIKA 1929 WP(C).No. 33482 of 2007(J) -------------------------- OS.499/2005 of PRL.M.C., KOCHI .................... PETITIONERS: ----------------- 1. K.A.SURESH, S/O.SUKUMARAN, KAITHAVALAPPIL, NAYARAMBALAM VILLAGE, NAYARAMBALAM, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THANKAMMA, W/O.SUKUMARAN, KAITHAVALAPPIL, NAYARAMBALAM VILLAGE, NAYARAMBALAM, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.RAMNATH SRI.UNNIKRISHNAN. S (VELOTHIL) SRI.JEN.V.KURIAKOSE RESPONDENT: ----------------- DINESAN, S/O.KANDAN, NIKATHITHARA HOUSE, NEDUNGAD NORTH, NAYARAMBALAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.C. NO. 33482 OF 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 14th day of November, 2007. J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed for a direction to the Court below to direct the Advocate Commissioner to identify the 10 cents of kudikidappu and pass appropriate orders on Exts.P8 and P9 applications. A perusal of the records would reveal that the present writ petitioner has filed two applications Exts.P7 and P8 with a prayer to the Court to direct the Commissioner to submit additional reports in the light of the averments in the affidavit. Ext.P8 is another application whereby a document is directed to be produced by the defendant. I feel before proceeding with the matter in the list, the Court has necessarily to dispose of Exts.P7 and P8 applications. Therefore, the writ petition is allowed and I direct the Court below to consider and dispose of Exts.P7 and P8 applications after hearing both sides in accordance with law and till that time not to include the matter in the list for trial. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-