[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION W.P.NO.990 OF 2005 Ashok G.Kolambekar ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.N.N.Gavankar with Mr.Arfan Sait Advocate for Petitioner Mr.R.M.Sawant Govt.Pleader for Respondents ... CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : JULY 13, 2006 DATE : JULY 13, 2006 DATE : JULY 13, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Petitioner was charge-sheeted pursuant to which, enquiry was held and he was found guilty of misconduct. Punishment of dismissal was imposed on the petitioner. Petitioner preferred administrative appeal which came to be allowed and the petitioner came to be posted as a Clerk. 2. It appears that during this period, the petitioner started taking money under the pretext that he would be granting jobs in the Industrial Court. Petitioner admitted the same. He came to be dismissed and the administrative appeal also came to [-2-] be rejected. 3. It is this order which is the subject matter of this writ petition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks sympathy on the ground that it is the petitioner’s wife and children who will be suffering consequent of the acts of the petitioner. The charges against the petitioner are of collecting money in the name of providing jobs in the quasi judicial institution. Considering that, it is not possible for us to take a view different than the view taken by the appellate authority. No interference is called for. Petition is dismissed. [ F.I.REBELLO, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]