Cr. Revision No. 163 of 2003 29.7.2010. Present: Mr. Vinay Thakur, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Guleria, Asstt. A.G. for the respondent. Smt. Rama Devi, complainant is also present. Cr.M.P. No. 578 of 2010 and Cr. Revision No. 163 of 2003: A joint application has been filed by the petitioners and respondent No. 2/complainant, for permission to compromise the matter. Statement of the complainant to this effect has been recorded separately. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners against their conviction. My attention has been drawn to a decision in K.L.E. Society and others versus Siddalingesh, (2008) 4 Supreme Court Cases 541, wherein it was observed that inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. can be exercised in appropriate cases. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the revision petition filed by the petitioners against their conviction stands allowed, being compromised, and the sentence imposed by the learned trial Court and upheld by the learned Sessions Judge, is set aside. Bail bonds furnished by the petitioners stand discharged. The revision petition as well as application stand disposed of accordingly. July 29, 2010. (V.K. Ahuja), (BSS) Judge.