THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.86 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner filed W.P.No.29095 of 2010 complaining that he is not being paid subsistence allowance, though he was placed under suspension long back. The writ petition was disposed of on 23.11.2010 directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for enhancement of the subsistence allowance in accordance with law. This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondent did not act according to the directions issued by this Court. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. It is no doubt true that there was some delay on the part of the respondent. However, on 09.06.2001, he has issued a Memo through which cheques for two sums, namely Rs.51,718/- and 26,751/-, were issued in favour of the petitioner. If the petitioner has still any grievance, he has to purse the remedies before the appropriate forum. The contempt case is accordingly closed. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:13.06.2011 kdl