IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Appln. No. 718 of 2005 Vikram Bahal and others ………… Applicants Versus Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun and others ……..….. Respondents Mr. Arvind Vashishth, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. H.C. Pandey, Asstt. Govt. Advocate for the State. Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Mr. Arvind Vashishth, learned counsel for the applicant / petitioners and Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 stated that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and husband and wife are now living together. In view of said development, both the counsel prayed that the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 57 of 2005 under Section 365, 506, 498 A of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act may be quashed. In view of the compromise between the parties to the matrimony, the impugned proceedings in case No. 1099 of 2005 arising out of case crime No. 57 of 2005 are quashed. The urgency application No. 1138 of 2005 also stands disposed of. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt. 21st December, 2005. HN