IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 7TH JULY 2011 / 16TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 18403 of 2011(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. VINOD N.P., S/O.DAMODARAN, NANDANAM HOUSE, IRIMBILYAM P.O., VALANCHERY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. SHIBIL MECHERI, S/O.MOHAMMED BASHEER, MEHCERI HOUSE, EZHUR, TIRUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. ABDUL HASEEB K., S/O.MOIDEEN K., KAMBRATH HOUSE, KOTTAKKAL, MANAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673635. 2. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673635, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. SC SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 18403 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE HALL TICKET ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF THE FIRST PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT EXT.P1(a)- TRUE COPY OF THE HALL TICKET ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF THE 2ND PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT EXT.P1(b)- TRUE COPY OF THE HALL TICKET ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF THE THIRD PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 9.6.11 ISSUED FROM THE FAROOK INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES TO THE FIRST PETITIONER EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT (True Copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No. 18403/2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of July, 2011. JUDGMENT Petitioners completed B.Com Degree Course. When the result of the final year examination was declared, they had failed in one paper. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC Judge mrcs