/-. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION(S) N0. ^^2-OF 201 1 PETITIONER; ^ ..^\ ••"'^1-^ -v<.-^' Gorelal Patel, Aged About- 53 Years, S/o- Shri Jogiram Patel, Occupation- Service-Working as Head Master, Navin Primary School, Shankarpara, Prasad, Thasil- Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS <^" ^^> -.••'' %3 RESPONDENT(S): 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) '.Collector, Janjgir-Champa Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) >'.^ ^'s^ ...-^•^" f~ S.BIock Education Officer, Block- Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W i %vsa^. ^3 ^^ ^' PETITSONER HjGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 5842 OF 2011 Gorelal Pate! RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Othsrs (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of india^ Singte Bench : Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate for the petiSioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER , on this 29th day of September, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submite that the petifoner is presently working as Headmaster at Navin Primary Schooi, Shankarpara, Prasad, Tahsii Akaltara, District Janjgir-Champa. Vide impugned order dated 15 Jun!y, 2011 (Annexure P-1), the petitioner has been transferred to Govt. Primary School Be!hadih, Malkharauda, on administratsve grounds. Shri Pandey, further submits that the said order is defective, as Ihe present posting of the petitioner has been shown as Govt. Primary Schooi Parsada, Raymond. 2. Shri Singh, learned counsel appearing for the Stata/respondents submits that, if there is any clerical mistake in the Impugned transfer order, as aforestated, the same shall be corrected and a fresh oFder shall be passed. He further submits that till then, the impugned order dated 15 July, 2011 (Annexure P-1) shait not be given effect to in respectofthe petitioner, ifthesameh^ notbeenmadeeffective. 3. ln view of the above, according to learned counse! appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication in this matter. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforestated observation. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok