IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.(T) No. 3612 of 2008. Decided on: 7th September, 2010. Kripal Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate vice Mr. U.S. Thakur, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. None for respondents No. 4 to 6. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. G.R. Palsra, learned vice counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petition has become infructuous due to intervening developments. Disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge September 07, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?