£INQl ^m IN THE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Detition rd NoJlf6 / 2011 c- PETITIONER : ^•^ ^" -•;^':::::..f<,1^' ^f^ ''"":...-'::'\' 9 ..--•^ ^.^•••'" RESPONDENTS 1- Sulochana Bai D/o Late Manglu, aged about 50 years, R/o Plot No. 572/5 Vindhyawasini Ward No. 14 [New ward No-20] Kawardha. Distt-Kabirdham. (CG). Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Kawardha District - Kabirdham. (CG) Municipal Council Kawardha through The Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council Kawardha , Distt-Kabirdham. (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDLA. 2- HTOH COIJRT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BTTA8PUR WRTT PETmON rONo. 5670 of2011 PETmONER RE8PONDENT8 Siilochana Bai. VER8IJS Stete ofChhattisgarh & AiiothCT. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 8B: Hon'bte Shri Satisli K. Agnihotri, J. ^ -^ Present: Shri Ashok Vaishnav. Advocate tbrtlie petitioner. Slm Shasliaiik Tliakur, Paxiel Law^w fortlie State/respotident No.1. Shri Anm Sao^ Advocate for the respondeait No, 2. ORDRR (Passed on 26ta dayofSeptennber, 2011) At the very outset, Shri Sao, leamed coumel apparing for the respondent No. 2, on mstniction^ siibmits that no demolition m respect of the property in dispirte shall take place without "following the diie process of law and without afibrding an opportiinity ofhearing to the petitioiier. In view ofthe above submission^ aeeordmgto learaed counsel for the petstioner, nothing sur^ives for adjiidication m this matter at this stage Accordmgly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforestated obser^ation. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit