IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-5001 of 2009 Date of decision : 17.4.2009. ... Saheja and others ................ Petitioners vs. State of Haryana .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Sarfaraj Hussain, Advocate for the petitioners. Sh. Ashok Kumar Jindal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners No. 1 and 7, namely, Saheja and Hussain, have been arrested and as such their application for grant of anticipatory bail has become infructuous. Accordingly, petition qua petitioners No. 1 and 7, namely, Saheja and Hussain, stands dismissed as having become infructuous. So far as, petitioners No. 2 and 3, namely, Ibrahim and Iqbal are concerned, specific role has been attributed to them. The weapon of offence are yet to be recovered from them. So, no ground for grant of anticipatory bail to them is made out. Consequently, petition qua petitioners No. 2 and 3, namely, Ibrahim and Iqbal, stands dismissed. Crl.M. No. M-5001 of 2009 -2- So far as, petitioner No.4- Hamida is concerned, he has been attributed fist blows, whereas petitioners No. 5 Smt. Umrbi and 6 Smt. Maimuna have been attributed pelting of bricks. No recovery is to be effected from them and they have joined the investigation. So, in these circumstances, order dated 20.2.2009, qua petitioners No. 4 to 6, namely, Hamida, Smt. Umrbi and Smt. Maimuna, is made absolute. ( K.C. Puri ) 17.4.2009. Judge chugh