$© HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR w.P. gS) No.6616/2oo7 PETITIONER Yadram Nirmalkar Son of Late Shri Banshi Lal aged about 6O yeaxs, resident of villags Chhuhiya, Post Torighat, Tahsil, Rajim, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Versus \ ~ RESPONDENTS 1. Stata of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K. S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. The Sub-Divisional Omcer, Water\ Resources Division, Fingeshwax, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. The. Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division Gariyaband, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Agpearance: Shri RP. Sahu, Counsel for the petitioner‘ Shn‘ N.K. Agrawal, Senior Advocate and Deputy Advocate General with Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Govt. Advocate for the State] respondents. ggAL ORDER (31.10.2007) sumL KUMAR smHA, J. Heaxd. Learned counsel for the yetitioner submits that a permanent Gang-man is to be retired at the age of 62 years in accordance with the Chhattisgarh Shaslciya Sak mdhivarSItiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam 1967 read with Fundamental Rules, 56. He also submits that the point raised has been decided by this Court in batch of matters i.e. WP. No. 108/ 2005 and many other connected matters on 04.01.2007, reported in 2007 (2) C.G.L.J. 29 {Gavind & Others vs. State of C.G. and others) and this matter is squarely covered by that decision, which may be disposed of on the same terms. ev / 2 W.P‘ (S) No.6616/2007 Learned counsel for the Stam fairly agreos that this matter is covered by some matters the said decision. the Stata has $€d Unless some inten‘m order of the writ appeal, t in abeyance, when th said judgment. filing kep In the result, this It is disposed of passed in WP. N order as to cost. in terms connected matters. No 0.108120% and mgr-”MM Sdl— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Raol shyna @\ Howevor, he submits that in writ appeals. is passed, merely on account of f this writ petition caxmot be covcrcd by the hearing o e matter is squarely peifm'on is allowed. dated 04.01.2007 of the order y { t 1 $ J l 1 t