Crl.Rev.No.147 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Rev.No.147 of 2009. Decided on: January 11, 2010. Jai Kishan .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.G.S.Duhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Gouripuria, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) This is second petition filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 03.01.2009, summoning the petitioner as additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Earlier the petition had been summoned but the said order was set aside by this Court as without completion of cross-examination of prosecutrix, the petitioner had been summoned as additional accused to face trial along with main accused Ram Kala. The allegations against the main accused Ram Kala are that he had kidnapped Kumari Suman whereas the . . . 1 Crl.Rev.No.147 of 2009 petitioner being her uncle had participated in the event of kidnapping I have gone through the cross-examination of prosecutrix who in her cross-examination admitted that she had named the petitioner as co-accused on the basis of suspicion presuming that he might have also been involved in the case. From the admission in the cross-examination, chances of conviction of the petitioner are remote. The basic guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case Michael Machado & anr. Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, 2000(2), RCR, 75 seem to have again been ignored by the trial Court while summoning the petitioner as additional accused. In view of the above circumstances, the impugned order dated 03.01.2009, is hereby set aside. Allowed. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE January 11, 2010. rka . . . 2