IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH JUNE 2007 / 16TH JYAISHTA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 3361 of 2007() ----------------------------- CMP.3376/2007 of J.M.F.C.-III,NEYYATTINKARA CRIME NO.182/07 OF BALARAMAPURAM POLICE STATION .................... : PETITIONER/ACCUSED ----------------------------------- SUNIL KUMAR @ SURESH, S/O.SREEKUMAR, VADAKKEKKARA THERIVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, KOZHODU ANTHIYOOR DESOM, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.V.VIJULAL RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAI GEORGE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No. 3361 OF 2007 ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 6th day of June, 2007 O R D E R Petitioner, who is the accused in Crime No.182/07 of Balaramapuram Police Station for an offence punishable under Sec.379 IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 10.2.07. The petitioner was arrested on 25.5.07. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of the judicial custody of the petitioner, the present stage of investigation and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. (V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE) aks