IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2008 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 9848 of 2008(V) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ JOSE PUNNELI, AGED 48, S/O.LONAPPAN PUNNELIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KALLETTUMKARA VILLAGE TRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.MADHUSOODANAN SRI.T.V.JAYAKUMAR NAMBOODIRI SRI.THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY SRI.M.M.VINOD KUMAR SMT.K.M.RAMYA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. KERALA SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., SHANTI NAGAR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY MANAGING DIRECTOR P.B.NO.50, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. MANAGER, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE KALLETTUMKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. R.T.PRADEEP, SC FOR SIDCO THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 9848 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: MARCH 25, 2008 JUDGMENT In this writ petition the prayer sought for is to quash Ext.P8 and to direct the 1st respondent to issue permission to the petitioner to construct the compound wall and the factory building as per Ext.P6 plan in the 13 cents of land. 2. Ext.P8 discloses a resolution of the Board of Directors to resume an internal road that was wrongly allotted to the petitioner. It is in pursuance to the said resolution that the respondent had issued Ext.P9 requiring the petitioner to show cause as to why the internal road under his possession should not be resumed and why the corporation should not take possession of the internal road. It is fairly clear from the facts that the petitioner has to show cause in reply to Ext.P9 and thereafter, untrammelled by what is stated in Ext.P8, it is a matter for the respondent to decide. 3. In view of this I dispose of the writ petition directing that within 15 days from today, the petitioner shall file his reply to WP(C) 9848/08 Page numbers Ext.P9 and on receipt thereof, the 1st respondent shall decide on the objection filed by the petitioner with notice to him. Until a decision is taken as above, further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P8 for resumption of the internal road will be kept in abeyance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-