1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.214 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.496 OF 2010 R.C.Advertising Co. .. Appellant vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay .. Respondents. WITH FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.5370 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.783 OF 2010 M/s.Sharad Sudhir and Co. .. Appellant vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay .. Respondents. Mr.Ashutosh Gole for the appellant in FA No.214/10 and for the applicant in CA No.496/10. Mr.J.J.Xavier for the respondent-corporation. Mr.Anil Singh i/b D.R.Shah for the appellant in FAST No.5370/10 and for the applicant in CA No.783/10. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 28/09/2010. PC: 1. Learned counsel for the appellants in both these appeals pray for withdrawal of the appeals with liberty to the appellants to pursue remedy of filing writ petitions challenging the order impugned in the first appeal and/or challenging the notice under section 55 under MRTP Act. They also pray for stay of the notice S 2 under section 55 of the MRTP Act for a period of eight weeks from today to enable them to file writ petitions and obtain appropriate order therein. Learned counsel for the respondent- corporation in all fairness stated that they will not take action for eight weeks from today. However, he submitted that all contentions of the corporation be kept open to be raised in the petitions that the appellants intend to file. In view of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties both the appeals are disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. All contentions of the parties are kept open. The corporation shall not take any coercive action in pursuance of notice under section 55 of the MRTP Act for a period of eight weeks from today. Consequently, civil applications are also disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.)