j^ .::siaa '"^s^^ ^^--^^ro^ , ^^ ^ , .• : ^ s?n9te89neh IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION TS1 N0. 3^\3> OF 2009 PETmONERS ..-••~/>' ^sy y ^^y .A^y •^ ^ / ^ /' / ^:, ^/.t>-'' ^y 1. 2. ^ Kartik Ram Barik, S/0 Shri Utter Kumar Barik, aged aboutZt years,0ccupation Shikshakarmt Class- III, R/0 Viltage- Tiharipali, Post- Katenda Saraipali, District- Mahasamund, (C.G..) -• District- Mahasamund,(C.G.). I • SachhidanandNirmalkar, S/0 Shri Reshamlat Nirmalkar, aged about 27years, Occupation ShikshakarmiClass- III, at Primary School KhamhardadBr Janpad Panchayat Pithora, District- Mahasamund, (C.G.) Rishi Kumar Diwan, S/0 Balak Ram Diwan, aged about 22 years Occupation-Shikshakarmi Ctess- III, R/0 Village- Chhatawan, Post- Rfko, District- Raipur, CC.G.} 4. Chartch-a KumaF Sahu, S/0 Shri Harihar Sahu, aged about 26 yeaps/Qccupation- Shikshakarmi Class-tII, R/0 Vitlage- Kisdi,'Talistl-Sara!i|Bli/ --fe,.::.y..s&;.iii£sMia8KaSBI ; -. 'E>istr-K:t-[M:a^a^myrtajUJi|;:gj22^Si 3. 'swsss ~^SSyvSffSM^ ;•^:'K^ti^££^S^ SSSiSSSSSS 5;iSS^SF^I^^f'^^^^^^^^^^^ii^wi^w 5. " Ku. SurendriSahu D/OShri Chhote LalSahu, aged about 21 years Occupation- Shikshakarnni Class- UJ, R/0 Village- Nayapara Khurd, Post- Pithora, District- Mahasamund, (C.G.) 6. Ashwani BarikS/0 late Shri Tejram Barik/agedabout 29 years, Occupation- Shikshakarmi Ctass-III, R/0 Village- Kusmisarar, Talisil Saraipali, District- Mahasamund, (C.G.) 7. Ku. Fulendri Patet, D/0 Narottam Patel, aged about- 20 years Occupation-Shikshakarmi Class- . III, R/0 Village- Maskarapali, Post- Limdarha, District- Mahasamund, (C.G.) a • B1;:] 8.'11 8. Smt. Deepanjali Pradhan, W/0 Ramesh Kumar Pradhan, aged about 25 years, Occupation- Shikshakarmi Class-ni, R/0 Village- Durugpali, Post- Rasoda, Basna, District- Mahasamund, (C.G.) ^y . . . : : : ..' 9. BhagwgtPrasad Kashyap,S/0 Shri.Sahdev ;Prasad.Kastt^i^i^Uiggg ':" """"BSSSKfiilill about251.years, Gfecu:t^SSiiB3S^M|ji ^is^S1'- B». v^ El': E6i: •: SK' Hit! B• Shikshakarmi Class-III at Government Middle School, RampurTuIda, Potice_Station- Btock Division Pithora, District- Mahasamund, (C.G.) VERSUS Kiai. RESPONDENTS B B ffiK BEIH': B 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Seeretary, Panchayat and Social Welfare, D. K. S. Bhawan Raipi^ District- Raipur,(C.G.) ^ 2. Collector, Mahasamund, District- Mahasamunct (C.G.) 3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pithora, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) '^ ' 4. District Education Officer, Mahasamund, DistriGt- Mahasamund (C.G.) / ,.. ^ : ' 5. Chief Execytive Officer, Districf-Panchayat Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.S.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS33TUTION OF INttEA Particulars ofAhe Detitioners: As stated in the caiuse titte. •li^ Eai KSW [-HC—78 6' 3!^? W M'* 'S^T 317^ sb+tJ^ •^ *<t*<CTKh»<l«t» 'S^F •<ti<ix')<i,yftly<i<o, factiyy j^&..^...3%:^ sn^'WRR; ('pt^'i'?) »«ira<^ftd SlSS? fRITINKER DIWAKER Shri Sunil SaiVu, counsel Shri Yashwant Singii 1,2864. Thfekur pres4nt Chailenge in the 10.6.2009 (Annexure Pl) pas| Janpad Panchayat, Pithora petitioners'-have been cancelle4 direction given by the High the petitioners were given an post oS Shiksha Karmi Grade with }aw and therefore, the sam) petition is to the order dated sed by the Chiel" Executive Officer, |sy which the appointment of the on the ground that pursuant to the in its judgment dated 14.3.2008, cjpportunity but their selection on the )II has not been found in accordance has been cancelled. CoUrt Counsel for the oetitionei mechanical in nature and hasj Officer without considering without mentioning as to whai further submits that.theordeFil name of the petitioners and subsequently and this itself impugned the authority has not| On the other hand, coLJnfiel petitioners have an alternatife Panchayat Shiksha Kanni (R4< Ru'les, 2007 (for short "the Rule| Aa.iby filing the appeal. +i*i(d41"f; MiMiA' '3 fetzt <F>]*{H iisrRman^i for the petitioners. tkur, Dy. A.G. for the State/resp. No. 1-s submits that the impugned order is been passed by the Chief Executive fp repiy of the petitioners and even ~' was the fault of the petitioners. He (npugned is cydostyle order -where the name of the school has been put- |hows that while passing the order applied its mind. ttk tlie for the State submits that the remedy under the Chhattisgarh cruitment & Conditions of Servicei 3, 2007) and to approach the Coliector 1: -'"^E i ,(j T •ii^^- "'^; .f^a^ '\ f t1 \. t^</ "t...••••Stsiaea-'-ja.^c—IS 31I^T qilft-lick ^T%IT STI^T^Rh? <y 'ff-" K '3^«41<il<fl*l, 8>lll-M''|ic, MMI'Hy ^..........|<4^£..G&^...^.^^^oa ^WVil (t><1|c(» v T ' ^'[^ Sn^F'q^T (Tpf^^tt) / l^giw ^ftff sii^f -2-- At this stage, counsel for this Court to withdraw the prese] the Collector by filing an appeal. .tKe appeal'they will also file an ^ .applieatiQnsfare decided by the C<| 'the petifiohers may be allowed to^ |:he petitioners seeks permission of |lt petition with liberty to approach |He further submits that aiong with tpplication for stay and till the said IIlector after due application of mind trork as Shiksha Karmi Grade III. Considering the totality permitfed:;to; withdraw the prese^ the Collector under the Rules, 2(] file an appeal before the Collectij receipt of the copy of this order al| the said application for stay is application of mind, the petitioj Shiksha Karmi Grade I!I. It is expected from tbe the petitioners as well as the ott^ support of their respective claims; with law, on its merits, expeditioul ^l^fd'yt^ 'HW^ ^Ts^ <f<^i< i;3ifii*»3ii^n af the facts, the petitioners are it petition with liberty to approach 107. The oetitioners are reauired to ir within 15 days from the date of ing with an application for stay. Till iecided by the CoUector after due lers shalS be allowed to work as Colltctor to afford proper opportunity to er side to submit all the detaiSs in and decide the samein accordarice siy. _ __- Sd/- ^— ' Pritinker Diwakar C Judge