Ll!i:!'..Jli:'i''!)"!'''^ii'?:ii?Tf^r^:'3^'-^:^-' IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OFLCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(SLNO. h\^fi /2010 PETITIONERS ^ ^^' ..-^/ ,<s /-y%^ .^:' X.Y =•"" ^ X°l6 'ii.,^'^y ^^- MTa.Vt<T 1 Pradeep SQBtes Beck, S/o Late Shri Francis Beck, aged about 31 years, Vm-Tumla(GoUdih), ,.•• Post-Tumla, Block-Farsabahar and Distt. Jashpur (C.G.). 2 Prem Chand Mahto, S/o Late Shri Madan Ram Mahto, aged about 30 years, ViU-Joratarai, Post-Basantala, Block-Kunkuri and Distt. Jashpur (C.G.). ^"" '3. Ajit Kumar Singh, S/o Late Shri F'una Ram, aged about 36 years, ViU- Hastinapur, Post- Narayanpur, Block-Kunkuri and Distt. Jashpur (C.G.). 4. Arun Prabhat Ekka, S/o Late Shri Wiliani Ekka, aged about 38 years, ViU-Khajurbahar, Post-Ginabahar Block-Kunkuri and Distt. Jashpur (C.G.). VERSUS n~—' 9. .^ RESPONDENTS :1 State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, Department of General Adininistration Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Secretary, School Education Deparbment, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 3. The CoUector, Jashpur,District-Jashpur(C.G.) 4. District Education Officer, Jashpur,Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Farsabahar ^District-Jashpur (C.G.). 6. Chief Executive Of&cer, Janpad Panchayat, Kunkuri District-Jashpur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA T -^•' WHC1! »*SS% "TS^ "41'4M-4, ^^yjl<a, ftc1l'MlJ,< __.^A.M.m..ciM.4^.l?. u 3ii^i iraq? (1pf3^?) sn^iqii'fe'iNr STI^ s»i*i ^nim^feisn^i 23-08-2010 Shri Somkant Verma, counsel fdi Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advoc4' Heard. The petitioners have filed this p| of Assistant Teachers who died vvhile i| compassionate appointment and they ^, of Shlksha Karmi Grade III. The petitiorj appointed as Assistant Teacher accordi Learned State counsel submitte^ be given an opportunity offiiing the dets respondent authority, which may be con with law. Having considered and wjthout the case, in the opinion ofthis Court, er is gjven to the petitioners to make grtevances before the competent respo petition and this order, within six weeks being filed, the compstent respondentai merits in accordance with law as early four months from the date of receipt o( remains, the petitioners may avail the rei^edy availabte underthe law. With the aforesaid observati' Certjfied copy as per rules. q^feftst Wiaf •q'fe'Zt TfiR?R ^;3lfiTO3iI^I dvastava,J. the petitioners. B ibr the State on advance copy. itition on the ground that they are wards sen/ice. They mov'ed an application for ave been given appointment on the post ers submitted ttiat they are entitled to be ig to ths policy. thatforthe present, the petitioners may led representation before the competent ^idered on its own merits, in accordance ^xpressing any opinion on the merits of Ids of iustice will be served, if a dirsction ^ detailed representation raising their [ident authority along with a copy of the |from today, and on such representation |thority shall decide the same on its own (is possible preferably witliin a period of the representation. if any grievance stiil (i, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava5 Judge i