IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.19298 of 2007 ***** Brahmdeo Mahto, son of Late Bhikhari Mahto, resident of village- Meghi, P.S.-Deep Nagar, District-Nalanda. …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Ajit Kumar son of Ram Lakhan Prasad, resident of village- Meghi, P.S.-Deep Nagar, District-Nalanda. …. …. Opposite parties ----------- 8. 14.5.2009. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and the learned A.P.P. for the State, this Court is not convinced with the submission made at the Bar that there is no evidence at all against the petitioner for taking cognizance in the matter merely because in the given circumstance a final form has been submitted. With the reasons being available in the impugned order, the Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter. However, the petitioner is given liberty to urge all such points which may be available to him at the time of framing of charge. The application for quashing the order taking cognizance is dismissed with above liberty. The order of stay stands vacated. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)