1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 1332 of 2010 Imtiyaz v. State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr H. Katekar, Adv for applicant Ms A.R. Taiwade, APP for State Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 1.9.2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Learned APP has expressed her inability to file reply inspite of undertaking given on 24th August 2010 on which date interim protection was given to the applicant. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant being an employee of the shop, was not responsible for purchase and sale of “actifed drug” which is Schedule-H drug. He further submits that the said drug is not used for intoxication, but its consumption is done in case of cough and cold. 3. Looking to the fact that evidence to be collected is documentary in nature and the applicant is an employee, I deem it fit to confirm the interim protection granted in fravour of the applicant by order dated 24th August 2010. 2 4. Hence, interim bail granted to the applicant vide order dated 24th August 2010 is hereby confirmed subject to the same terms and conditions as are stated therein. Application stands disposed of accordingly. Judge. joshi