IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40960 of 2008 1. JAGDISH LAL 2. SUBHASH CHANDRA SAHGAL @ SUBHASH CHANDRA 3. PAPPU SAHGAL @ SUNIL KUMAR 4. ROHIT SAHGAL @ ROHIT KUMAR ……………..PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR …………..OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2. 16.10.2008. Heard both the sides. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case under Section 420 besides some other sections of Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the entire case is false and baseless. These petitioners are businessmen at Delhi. The complainant was employee of the firm of the petitioners. The complainant cheated the petitioners and committed fraud by withdrawing money from the account of the petitioners for which a police case was filed vide annexure-3. In retaliation this false case has been filed with absurd and improper allegation which is also apparent from the impugned order. It is further submitted that in the case lodged by the petitioners the complainant has been declared as absconder. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in case of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from the date of receipt of this order, petitioners namely, Jagdish Lal, Subhash Chandra Sahgal @ Subhash Chandra, Pappu Sahgal @ Sunil Kumar and Rohit Sahgal @ Rohit Kumar are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like - 2 - amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Samastipur in connection with Complainant Case No. 355 of 2006, Trial No. 2476 of 2007, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)