IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARAYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4024 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: November 30, 2010 Onkar Singh ….Petitioner Versus Punjab Wakf Board and another ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jai Bhagwan Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1. *** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.(Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order of the Tribunal, who has ordered the ejectment of the petitioner from the shops in dispute allegedly owned by the Punjab Wakf Board. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon a judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Ramesh Gobindram (deceased by LRs.) Vs. Sugra Humayun Mirza Wakf, 2010(SC) 2897 to submit that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to decide the lis between the Punjab Wakf Board and the tenant. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 accepts this argument and states that impugned order be set aside and they may be allowed to file appropriate lis before the Civil Court. In view of the aforesaid, the revision is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. However, the Punjab Wakf Board is given liberty to file appropriate petition before the Civil Court in accordance with law, if they so desire. 30.11.2010 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vcgarg JUDGE