IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO.98 OF 2009 (MS) Fateh Mishra and others. ………….. Petitioners. Versus Union of India and others. ……………. Opposite Party Mr. Karan Anand, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate for respondent no.2 and 3. 20th January, 2009 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a writ of Certiorari quashing the demand notice dated 29.4.2008 (contained as Annexure No.A-2 to the writ petition), whereby, the Bank demanded the petitioner to pay the outstanding loan amount in lumpsum. Further prayer has been made for a writ of certiorari quashing the publication for auction of the sale of the property in question dated 1.1.2009 (contained as Annexure No.A-3 to the writ petition. A prayer has also been made for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Bank to provide the details of account statement of the petitioners’ overdraft account. Learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Karan Anand states that the petitioners are ready to negotiate with the Bank Authorities in order to refund the loan amount. In case, the petitioners file a representation regarding refund of the entire loan amount before the Bank Authorities, the same shall be considered before 22nd of this month. The Bank Authorities shall consider the prayer made by the petitioner regarding postponement of the date of auction. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of finally. Let the copy of this order be issued today. (V, K. Bist, J.) Vacation Judge 20.1.2009 Rathour