IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2010 / 2ND MAGHA 1931 RP.No. 1252 of 2009(U) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.33405/2009 Dated 20/11/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------------------------------------ MOIDEENKUTTY,S/O.HAMZA,KOTTUNGAL HOUSE, POST KUTTIPURAM TIRUR TALUK-MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------------------- 1. KUTTIPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, POST KUTTIPPURAM,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,REP; BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY,KUTTIPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT POST KUTTIPURAM,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. BEEFATHIKKUTTY HAJJUMMA,W/O.KORATH ILLATH VALAPPIL BAPPU HAJI,POST KUTTIPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P.1252/2009 in W.P.(C).33405/2009-U = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2010. O R D E R The judgment sought to be reviewed was issued on two grounds. Firstly, there was considerable confusion on the facts as disclosed by the materials on record. Secondly, and more importantly, it was noticed that the petitioner has remedies before the Grama Panchayat Secretary and also other statutory authorities. Though reference was made to the contents of a couple of documents, the judgment did not rest on it. Not only that, the statements in that judgment will not stand in the way or in any manner preclude other remedies that may be available. The writ jurisdiction was refused primarily because the petitioner has alternate statutory remedies. Under such circumstances, I do not find any ground to hold that there is any error apparent RP1252/09 -: 2 :- on the face of the record of the judgment sought to be reviewed and that this matter has, therefore, to be entertained. Hence, leaving open all contentions, this review petition is dismissed. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/2201