IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4181 of 2010 1. RAVINDRA NATH THAKUR S/O SRI MALLICK THAKUR R/O VILL.- BHACHHI, P.S. BAHERI, DISTT.- DARBHANGA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHUBANI 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION SUPERINTENDENT, MADHUBANI 4. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, LAKHNAUR, MADHUBANI 5. ADDL. PROGRAM OFFICER, LAKHNAUR, MADHUBANI 6. B.R.P. OF BLOCK RESOURCE CENTRE, LAKHNAUR, MADHUBANI 7. HEAD MASTER, GOVT. MIDDLE SCHOOL, LAKHNAUR, MADHUBANI 8. MUKHIA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, LAKHNAUR, MADHUBANI ----------- 2. 16.12.2010 The allegations made in the writ application that resignation letter was forcibly obtained from the petitioner by respondent No. 5, seems to be a cock and bull story not supported by any independent material or evidence in this regard. If what has been pleaded by the petitioner is correct, a cognizable offence has been made out and petitioner will have to first seek remedy before a criminal court and only when a finding comes, there may be an occasion to consider the claim of the petitioner. The writ application is dismissed in the light of the aforesaid observations. Devendra/ ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)