IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 11TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 20TH KARTHIKA 1932 RP.No. 483 of 2007(H) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT/ORDER IN WP(C) NO. 12680/2004 DATED 06/12/2006. .......................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/REPONDENTS 1 TO 3 IN THE W.P.C.: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.P. NANDAKUMAR. RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN THE W.P.C: ------------------------------------------------------------ *1. M.RAMANKUTTY, (RTD. HEAD CONSTABLE H.C.NO.7212, THOTTILPALAM POLICE STATION, PANNIYAMKAD HOUSE, SREE KRISHNAPURAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. (DIED) *ADDL. RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 IMPLEADED ADDL. R2: SMT.M. MADHAVIKUTTY, AGED 58 YEARS, W/O.M.RAMANKUTTY, PANNIYAKKAD HOUSE, SREEKRISHNA PURAM POST, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. ADDL. R3: M. SREERAJ, S/O.M. RAMANKUTTY, PANNIYAKKAD HOUSE, SREEKRISHNA PURAM POST, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. ADDL. R4: M. RAJASREE, D/O.M. RAMANKUTTY, PANNIYAKKAD HOUSE, SREEKRISHNA PURAM POST, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. *ADDL. RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 13/09/2010 IN I.A.495/2010. BY ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKATESH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ----------------------------------- R.P.NO.483 OF 2007 IN W.P.(C) No.12680 OF 2004 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of November, 2010 ORDER This review petition is filed by the State seeking review of my judgment dated 6.12.2006 in W.P.(C)No.12680/04. In the same, this Court held thus in paragraph 5: “5. In the circumstances, there will be a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to disburse the pension in accordance with Ext.P12 pension sanctioning order as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The claim for DCRG will be finalized within a period of two months from that date. Likewise, the orders of regularization of suspension, if any, will also be issued within the aforesaid period of two months. The above directions shall be strictly complied with”. Now, the petitioner in the writ petition is no more. Therefore, the out come of the criminal case is of no consequence and the criminal case cannot be proceeded with to deny any terminal benefits to the legal heirs of the petitioner in the writ petition. As such, there is no point in considering the review petition on merits. R.P.NO.483/07 IN W.P.(C)No.12680/04 2 Accordingly, the review petition is closed with a direction to the petitioners in the review petition to disburse the terminal benefits, in respect of the petitioner in the writ petition, to his legal heirs as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd R.P.NO.483/07 IN W.P.(C)No.12680/04 3