1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.58 OF 2008 Goswami Shrimad Gokulnath Maharaj .. Petitioner Versus Nanji Bachu Patel & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.M.A.Khan for petitioner CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 9th January 2008 P.C. . This petition was dismissed for default as the learned Advocate was absent in the morning session. However, at his request and on his difficulty being pointed out, petition is 2 restored and placed for admission forthwith in afternoon session. 2. Heard learned Advocate for petitioner. Perused the impugned order. In the light of the clarification that is given by the Court below, it is not necessary to interfere with the order under challenge. The Court has amply clarified the issue inasmuch as it is between the petitioner and their Advocate. In the light of the observations in para 8 of the impugned order, there is no substance in the petition. Petition is accordingly dismissed. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)