IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 20TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 29TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 33405 of 2009(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MOIDEENKUTTY, S/O.HAMZA KOTTILINGAL HOUSE, POST KUTTIPURAM TIRUR TALUK-MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KUTTIPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH POST KUTTIPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, KUTTIPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, POST KUTTIPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. BEEFATHIKKUTTY HAJJUMMA, W/O.KORATH ILLATH VALAPPIL BAPPU HAJI, POST KUTTIPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN , J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P. (C) No. 33405 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext.P5 notice issued on 27.10.2009 whereby the Grama Punchayath Secretary has ordered closure of a chicken stall in room No.I/650. He shows that as per Ext.P4 application for licence has been rejected. That is in relation to I/645. Petitioner holds out Ext.P1. That shows that the petitioner's claims is that he is in possession of a building RP/16/99. With these materials it is inappropriate that this Court proceeds to decide on any issue which could easily raised or agitated before the statutory authority including by way of objection to Ext.P5. Even Ext.P2 and P3 evidence payment only in relation to room No. I/646 and not I/650. Hence without prejudice to the petitioner's right to seek relief from the Grama Panchayat Secretary or any other statutory authority, this writ petition is dismissed in limini. ( THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) jma