:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 956 OF 1996 NO. 956 OF 1996 NO. 956 OF 1996 Rajendra Kumar Gupta & Ors. ... Plaintiffs. V/s. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Ors. ... Defendants. .... Mr. R.S. Mishra for the Plaintiffs. Mr. R.Y. Sirsikar for Defendant 1. Mr. R.M. Yadav for Defendants 2 and 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD J. : DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD J. : DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD J. 13TH 13TH 13TH JULY 2007. JULY 2007. JULY 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Consent terms as between the Plaintiffs and the Second and third Defendants have been tendered and taken on record and marked as "X". The Consent Terms have been signed by the parties and the respective Advocates. On the Request of Counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiffs the suit shall stand dismissed as against the First Defendant - Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Defendants 4 to 7. Since the dispute as between the Plaintiff and the Second and Third Defendants has :2: been settled, there shall be a decree and order in terms of the Consent Terms. 2. It is clarified that the agreement contained between the parties in clause 17 of the Consent Terms shall not operate as any direction by this Court to the Court of the 44th Metropolitan Magistrate. The Learned Metropolitan Magistrate shall deal with the Criminal proceedings in accordance with law. ----