IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.771 of 2010 DEOSHEEL @ SUNNY THAKUR @ SUNNY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.5.2010 This revision application has been filed against the order dated 15.5.2010 passed by Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in Criminal Appeal No. 25/2010 by which he dismissed the appeal and confirmed the order dated 17.4.2010 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Muzaffarpur in Trial No. 523/2010 arising out of Brahampura P.S. Case No. 79/2009 whereby he rejected the prayer for bail. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that though petitioner’s prayer has twice been refused by this Court but now four of the co-accused persons including Sanjit Sahni having similar material, have been allowed regular bail by a Bench of this Court vide Cr.Misc.Nos. 8111 of 2010, 5668 of 2010, 6091 of 2010 and 6069 of 2010 even without assistance of section 12 of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000. In that view of the matter, petitioner is also entitled for the same relief which ought to be considered but not cared. Petitioner is in 2 custody since 29.7.2009. Accordingly, the revision application is allowed and orders of both the courts below are set aside. let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Muzaffarpur in Trial No. 523/2010 arising out of Brahampura P.S. Case No. 79/2009. It is made clear that one of the bailer shall be petitioner’s father who shall undertake to keep the petitioner under his observation and shall produce him whenever is ordered by the Juvenile Justice Board. Let this order be communicated to the aforesaid court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)