IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52048 of 2008 1. UMA SINGH, S/O LATE BHAGAWAT SINGH @ BHAGO SINGH 2. KABU SINGH, S/O GAJADHAR SINGH BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SIMARIYA, P.S. FATEHPUR, DISTRICT-GAYA ………… PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ………… OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 02/ 03-02-2009 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioners are accused in a case under Sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that co-accused Pradeep Paswan confessed that the petitioners were involved in a dacoity. An agreement for sale was prepared on 10.11.2006 whereby Gauri Devi, Pradeep Paswan’s mother had agreed to sale some land to petitioner no. 1. Petitioner no. 2 is a witness on the said document. Thereafter Gauri Devi refused to execute the sale deed because she was influenced by her son Pradeep Paswan. A Panchayati was held on 10.4.2007 where these facts were recorded by the Panchayat. It is submitted that the said Pradeep Paswan was arrested in a case and he has named the petitioners as co- accused although the petitioners have clean antecedent. Considering all these facts, petitioners, namely, Uma Singh and Kabu Siingh in the event of their arrest/surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of - 2 - Judicial Railway Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Gaya Rail P.S. Case No. 204 of 2006, G.R. No. 279 of 2006 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. S.Sb/- (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)