THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 17683 OF 2008 O R D E R: The petitioner is working as a Pharmacist in the Hakimpet Unit of Rapid Action Force. The Commandant of the unit had addressed letter, dated 14.2.2008, enclosing copy of their own letter dated 24.1.2008. It was mentioned that an Assistant Sub-Inspector (Pharmacist), by name K. Srujana, the 5th respondent herein, had addressed a letter dated 20.11.2007 alleging that the petitioner had used unparliamentary language and harassed her. The petitioner submits that the 5th respondent has since left the service, and there is no basis for requiring him to submit the explanation, or for the respondents to proceed against him. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 4. It is not in dispute that on receipt of the impugned letter, the petitioner had submitted his explanation on 12.6.2008. It is not even alleged that the 4th respondent does not have the jurisdiction to require the petitioner to submit the explanation for the allegation made by the 5th respondent. The petitioner can be said to have suffered any grievance, if only any order adverse to his interest is passed, in this connection. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as premature, and it is left open to the petitioner, to pursue his remedies, in case any order adverse to his interest is passed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ 14th August 2008 PAN