CWP (T) 10198 of 2008. 27.09.2011 Present: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Asstt. AG, for the respondents. Petitioner, who was appointed as a Lecturer on contract basis, filed the present writ petition, for regularization of his services. It was alleged that with a view to depriving the petitioner of the benefit of regularization as per policy of the Government, short breaks of a day or two were being effected, in continuation of the contract of the petitioner. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that petitioner has not been turning up to instruct him, despite his best efforts to get in touch with him and it is quite likely that his grievances might have been redressed. He says that the present writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek Redressal of those grievances, which might have remained un- redressed. Ordered accordingly. September 27, 2011 (PC). (Surjit Singh), J.