HIGH COURT OP CHHAmSGARH. BILASPUR W,P. (8) Np.5226/2007 PETITIONER KESPONDENTS Sadhuram Dhruv Son of Late Shri Chhabilal Dbruv, aged about 60 years, r/o viUage RaveU, Post Loharsi, Tahsil Rajim, Distnct Raipur(C.G) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Sub-Divisional Of&cer, Paui Caaal Water Resources Sub- Division No.2, Panduka, Distt. Raipur (C.G) 3. The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Gariyaband, Distt. Raipur (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Shri P.P. Sahu, Counsel fer the petitioner. Shri N.K, Agrawal, Seiuor Advocate and Deputy Advocate Greneral with Shri A.S. Kachhwafaa, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents. (31.10.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard. Learued counsel for the petitioner subniits that a permaiient Gaag-iaan is to be retired at the age of 62 years in accordauce wifh the Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiraycun 1967 read witfa Pundamental Rules, 56. He also submits that fhe point raised has been decided by this Court m bateh ofmatters i.e. W.P. No. 108/2005 and niauy other coniiected inatters on 04.01.2007, reported in 2007 {2) C.G.LJ. 29 (GovinA 8a Others vs. State ofC.G. cuid others) and this matter is squarely covered by that decision, which inay be disposed ofon the same tenns. W.P.(S)No.5226/2007 Leamed counsel for fhe Stete fairly agrees that fhis niatter is covered by fhe said decision. However, he subnuts that in soiue matters the State has filed writ appeals. Unless some iaterua order is passed, merely on accoitat of filing of the writ appeal, hearing of this writ petition caonot be kept in. abeyaace, when the matter is squarely covered by the said judgment. In the result, this petition 1s atlowed. It is disposed of ia tenns of fhe order dated 04.01.2007 passed ia W.P. No.108/2005 aad ofher cormected inatters. No order as to cost. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ff^)