IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2010 / 31ST ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 22911 of 2010(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SCARIA ANTONY, OVERSEER (ELECTRICAL), ELECTRICAL SECTION, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.RAJEEV RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDHUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, (HRM), KSEB, VYDHUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SC SRI. K.S. ANIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.22911 OF 2010(L) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he is working as an Overseer(Electrical) under the first respondent. According to him he is qualified to be promoted to the post of Sub Engineer (Electrical) in the quota ear marked for Overseers. It is stated that despite his eligibility, his claim is not considered so far. Complaining this he has filed Ext.P8 representation before the 2nd respondent and orders have not been passed so far. It is with this grievance that the writ petition is filed. 2. In view of the pendency of Ext.P8 before the 2nd respondent, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P8 representation and pass orders on this. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :