wm RESPGNDENTS Ema max? 0? cHm‘a’i‘TmGm, mmsFUR 5m». gs} No. 7033;26s37 PETETIGNER 1. Dhansai, Sja Bisahu Ram, agsi‘i about 47 y€am, R/o. Vm. 6x1, Fbst Chaima, Tah. Pali, District Korba (C.G.) 2. Ramund Bai, D/o Jagat Ram, ag€d about 50 yéars, Rfo.Vili. 8a Post. Surtra, Tah$i1 Katghora, Distu‘ct Korba (C.G.) iiersus State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Public WorkS D€par£ment, Meiuralaya, D. K. f3. Bhawem, Raipur (C.G.) Sub Divisioraai Ojiicer, Sub Divisimiai No. 1, Pubh'c Wsrks Dapartnmnt, (PWD}, Katghora, DiStrict Korba (OGI) WRET PETETIGN $NI3ER ARTICLE 22$ {EF THE CQNSTITUTI$E (3F EEDEA wearance: Shri Vincd Tskam, CQunsal for “£116 peti‘donas. Shn' AS. Kachhwaha, Govt. Acivocatg for the. State 911 advallce copy. GRAL mmEK {25.11.2{30‘n Six-NIL KUMAR Swim; J» Hcard. Leained counsel for T116 pctitioacrs submits that a pcnnanent Gang-man is to be rem‘md at thc agc of 62 ycars in accordalme Wifh the Chi’ulttisgarh Sh,aSic1'ya Sevak @dhivarshikbAyu) Adhinz’yam 1967 read wifh Fundamental Rules‘ 56. He also submits that the yomt raiged hae been decided by this Court 311 baich ofmatters i.e. WP. No. 108/2005 311d many other colmected matters on 04.0}.2007, reported in 2007 {2) C.G.L.J. £§ (mafimi & when rm, Suzie of (LG. wad othemg a11d this matter is squaxeiy covered by That decision, which may be disposeci of on the same terms. Leariied ceunsei for the State fairly agreeS than fthis matter is covered by the said decieion. However, he submits _ that in some matters the State has iiiec'i writ appeais. \ \ WP. (S) No.703 8/2007 @ UnleSS some int€rim order is passaL merely on account of 1‘3ling of the writ appeal, hearing of this writ petiu‘on cazlnot be kept in abeyance, Whea the matter is squarely covered by the said judgment, In the I‘eSult? this petition is ajlowed. It is disposed of 1'11 terms of the or(ier dated 04.012007 passed 1'11 WP. No.108/ 2005 a11d other connected matters. No order as to cost. t ‘ ‘ Sd/— I Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge