W H7$§i $0URT m5 CHHAWiSGiKRH: 33LA$W§R Vim Pe€itian=§§i§ia 1S95 of 2:398 Fetiiioneg Khoqendra Kumar Saiam. 810‘ Shn Tmsi Ram Saiam, aged absut 36 years; egcupaticn — pcaLer,’ as Petwari; a Hatka \‘c ‘18 Gamawada, RN Board — Dantewacia. Tahsii — Dantewada, Distt. Sauth Bastar, Dantewada (CG). Versus Respondents 1 ) The , nt G‘Ch‘naiitisaa 9f Rex/egue, h D‘KSA fhrough Bhawan. the Secxeta’y éamur ectca: Dantewada‘ Disft Da'ntswaéa 0O $ub Dwiséonaé Offisei, (RevenueL Dame/vada, b dish. a; "x pantewada (CG). 4; Tahsndar, Dantewada, mm. Daniewada {CG). b} a:I u m t 0) (Wm Petiiior: under Articie 226 of thé Ccm‘i’xiui‘mn cf in a; $§: Hoa’hse Ms: Satis§x K. ggmhciri, J. Dr. Sangeet Sharma, caunse': forihe petitioner. Shri LIN‘S‘ Dec), Govt. Advocate forthe $813 ?:esem: $R£L (DREW? {Passed cn 153-2608} With consen’i 0f ieamed comma appearing far hem the parties, ihe matte? £3 heard maiiy, 2) Learned counsei agapearing for the getitioner submiis that me paitioner was pasted as Paiwari in Patwari Haika Nar§¢1 Gamawada, TahsH and Di‘t. Dankewada. The petitioner has been transferred is Easter, Dist Basrar, by orderdated 7—7-2i307 (Annexure P11), 3) Learned ccunse; appearing for the eeratmner as was as far the State/respondents ;cinr§y submit that rhe fears and questien ef‘ raw mvmved m the petiticm are the same to that of Writ Petition (S) 5826 er 2007 tPramoti Kama: Shani ,Vs. State of Chhettisgarh & others), which was diseased of by order l dated ?4~1~20G8. Learned counse’ fmher sub: disposecj of m the same terms. nits that ihis petiticn may be 4) 3n véew 0f the above—stated submission made by ieamed counsei appearing in me same farms La, the ée arrangemeni withm a period of fsur weeks fer reiieving and aiicwing the peiiiiener is jcin his new eiaee L pest; subject to verificatise 3f the facts. Ne ei’der asie (my di for the parties, me writ petitkan is d§sposed of 5 , respondents are directed to make suifab f 5 — “\h‘o“ ‘ . “K. Ag Sans Jm‘ge r