IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-21308 of 2009 Date of decision: September 10, 2009 Labh Chand -Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others -Respondents Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta Present: Mr. GS Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, AAG, Haryana, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. PK Ganga, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Rajan Gupta, J.(Oral) Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner and respondent No.3 are husband & wife. The dispute between them is with regard to irrigation of some land from a common tube-well. According to Mr. Dhir, civil litigation in that regard is already pending before the civil court. He further submits that the police is not harassing the petitioner in any manner. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the prayer made in the petition has been rendered infructuous. The petition is dismissed as such. [Rajan Gupta] Judge September 10, 2009. 'ask'