1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No.13567 Of 2009 In Second Appeal NO.714 OF 2009 Pratap s/o Digambar Prasad. ... Applicant. Versus Mohanlal s/o Arjundas Shamnani... Respondent. -------- Shri. S.C. Arora, Advocate for the applicant. Shri. D.P. Palodkar, Advocate for respondent. -------- CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. DATE: 7th JANUARY 2010 PER COURT : 1) Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the respondent. 2) The learned counsel appearing for the respondent, on instructions, makes a statement 2 that he would not alienate the property during pendnecy of the litigation and would not put any third party in possession of the property. It is also further submitted that the decree of the trial Court is already executed and a re-conveyance deed is also got executed by the plaintiff. 3) In view of the statement made by the counsel for the respondent no orders are required to be passed in the instant civil application. The civil application stands rejected. (R.M. BORDE, J.) rsl/ ca.13567.09