IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 11686 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: May 24, 2010. Lal Singh and another ...... PETITIONERS Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. P.S.Grewal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.M.Anand, Addl.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Gopal Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.300 dated 06.10.2009, under Sections, 304-B/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Dharuhera, District Rewari. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. CRM No.M-11686 of 2010 This Court while issuing notice of motion on 23.04.2010 passed the following order:- “Crl.M.No.20944 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-11686 of 2010 Argues that petitioners used to live separate from their son, i.e. husband of the deceased, and that during investigation they were found innocent by the police and challan was filed against son of petitioners only, namely, Lok Chand, i.e. husband of the deceased. Further argues that petitioners have been summoned by learned trial Court on an application filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. without even conducting cross-examination on PW-2 Murari Lal. Further argues that petitioners are old and ailing persons and that they are ready to appear before learned trial Court and face trial. Notice of motion for 24.5.2010. However, petitioners are directed to appear before learned trial Court within two weeks from today and in case they so appear, they be admitted to interim bail by learned trial court subject to any conditions that may be imposed by it.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have already appeared before learned trial Court pursuant to said order and admitted to interim bail by learned trial Court on 27.04.2010. Copy of the order dated 27.04.2010 has also been placed on record. It is further contended that they will continue to appear before learned trial Court. Learned counsel for the State has not disputed these facts. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. 2 CRM No.M-11686 of 2010 Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed by Lal Singh and Kamla is accepted and order dated 23.04.2010 granting interim bail to them is, hereby, made absolute subject to any conditions that may be imposed by learned trial Court. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) May 24, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 3