HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI3GARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH Coram : HON’BLE sHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. M.‘A. No.“ of 137112004 1 Smt. Resham Bai. Wlo Late Mohan Vashudeo Aged about 21 years 2 a Ku. Lakshawantin Bai D/o Late ' Mohan Vashudeo agecr about’3 years. 3 Daulal Slo Late Mohan‘Vashudeo aged 1 month 15 days ( Legal. Guardian) Smt. Resham Bai Wlo Mohan Vashudeo, Purushottam S/o Dallu Vashudeo aged 45 years. Smt. Bela Bai Wlo Purushettam Vashudeo aged-42 years; All R/o Vinage -» behind Vandana a Auto, Vashudeo Para Ramkund, Shaheed Chudamadi Nayar Ward Thana Sarashwati Nagar Raipur Dist. Raipur (C.G.) APPELLANTS Versus 1. Mahesh Thakur Slo Ujjwal Singh Thakur aged about 48 years Rlo village- Near Chandi Mandir Rafu Nagar Durg Dist. Durg 2. Rajesh Agrawal Slo Ramanand Agrawal aged 33- years, Office MIS/J Shri Road Laince, Uria Diet. Raipur (C.G.) R/o 36 E Neharu Nagar Bhilai Thana Supela Tah & Dist. Durg (C.G.) ( Motor Owner Vehicie Truck Trailer No. C.G. O4 G-3258) National lnsurahoe Company Ltd. Mid'iita‘n Street Post Bax No. 9229 Koikatta 700071 Branch Mobin Mahal G.E. Road Raipur (C.G.) ‘MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF“ THE MOTOR VEHICLEs ACT.198$ i i i i RESPONDENTS i i T i Present: Shri Rishi Rahul Soni, counsel for the appellants. ORDER (11m February, .2009) The foilowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. : This matteris listed today for orders on the appellants’ default In comphance of the order dated 25 01 2006 ‘2. The appellants Vide order dated 25 01 2006 were directed - to take- steps for issuance of notice of the appeai to the respondents. 3. Though, a period of more than three years haselapsed E since the passing of the order dated 25.01.2006. the appellants have not taken any steps‘for the compliance of the order dated 25.01.2006 in. spite of grant o‘f' opportunity in that behalf by Additional Registrar (Judicial) vide order dated 01 03.2006; 4. ln this view of the matter, we are’left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for— non-compliance of the order date 25.01 .2006. I ' ‘ 5. The appeal, therefore; is dismissed for 'non-complianoe’ of the order dated 25.01 .2006. i 2 Sd/- Ma r e Sunil Kumar Sinha i I Judge il/V i 212/ ' Sdl- Chief Justice x gsubbu d