HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISIONBENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. & HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. APPELLANTS PETITIONERS Writ Appeal No.61 of 2008 1. Keshav Prasad Netam S/o Shri Mantram Netam, Aged about 20 years, R/o Viltage Tamori, Tahsil Palari, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Sarita Netam W/o Shri Praveen Kumar Netam, Aged about 24 years, R/o Vitlage Bharritola, Poltee Station and Tahsil Ambagarh Chowki, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. Parmanand Sahu S/o Shri Bisahuram Sahu, Aged about 33 years, R/o Tilda, Tahsil Tilda, District Raipur (C.G.) 4. Ganesh Ram Dhruv S/o Shri Mantram Dhruv, Aged about 31 years, R/o Village Muswadeeh, Tahsil Palari, District Raipur (C.G.) 5. Dayaram Dhruv S/o Shri Tekram Dhruv, Aged about 24 years, R/o Gadakusmi, Tahsil Palari, District Raipur (C.G.) 6. Kamlesh Verma S/o Shri Jawahar Lal Verma, Aged about 21 years, R/o Village Khomi, Tahsil Aarang, District Raipur (C.G.) 7. Paltan Singh Kanwar S/o Shri Santram Kanwar, Aged about 24 years, R/o of Village Gundardehi, Post Bandhabazar, Tahsil Ambagarh Chowki, District Rajnandgaon (C.G) 8. indrani Sahu D/o Shri Narayan Sahu, Aged about 20 years, R/o of Village Bharwadeeh l^la, Tahsil Tilda, Distrtet Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department of Panchayat and Sociat Welfare D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector Raipur District Raipur 3. The Sub Divisional Officer Balodabazar, District Raipur (C.Q.) 4. Janpad Panchayat Palari, Through its Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Palari District Raipur 5. The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Palari, District Raipur Writ Appeal Under Section 2(11 of Chhattisgarh Hiah Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act. 2008 Present: Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla, leamed counsel for the appeilants. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, learned Govt. Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3/State. JUDGMENT (23"1 April, 2008) The following Judgment of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the writ appeal fited by the appellants against the order dated 22-01-2008, passed in •s^ 'v^' subbu W.P. (S) No. 442/2008, with the liberty of filing another writ petition, ifthe future developments so warrant. 2. Permission granted. 3. Wfth the above liberty, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. '" Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge