IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 29TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 7TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 28183 of 2006(E) -------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: -------------------- 1. P.V. MANOHARAN, U.D. CLERK, ALIPARAMBU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DIST. 2. S. PADMAKUMAR, L.D.CLERK, ALIPARAMBU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PERINTHALMANNA TALUK, MALAPPURAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.M.NARENDRA KUMAR PRI.SALISH ARAVINDAKSHAN SRI.P.M.GHILS RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY TO LOCAL SELF GOVERNESS, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, O/O. DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DY. DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, O/O. DY. DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, MALAPPURAM. *ADDL. R4 IS IMPLEADED. 4. THE ALIPURAM PANCHAYATH REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, ALIPURAM PANCHAYATH OFFICE PAREL P.O. THOODHA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. *ADDL. R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DT. 13.11.2006 IN IA. 15476/2006. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) FOR R4 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW FOR R1TOR3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.28183/2006 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION SENT TO 3RD RESPONDENT DT. 5.7.06. P2:- COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSED NOTICE ISUED TO 2ND PETITIONER 29.5.06. P3:- COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE IST PETITIONER DT. 3.7.2006. P4:- COPY OF THE REPLY FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DT. NIL. P5:- COPY OF THE DECISION BY PANCHAYATH COMMITTEE DT. 19.7.06. P6:- COPY OF THE ORDER OF DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH DT. 5.10.06. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE tss KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.28183 of 2006 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioners approached this court with certain grievances regarding the disciplinary proceedings initiated against them. In view of the intervening developments in case the petitioners have still any grievance left they may approach the second respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) ahg. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------- W.P(C).No.28183 of 2006 ----------------------------------- JUDGMENT 29th September, 2008