IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 7499/2011 Decided on:19.10.2011 _____________________________________________ Chander Kant. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ankush Sood, Addl. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. Naresh Kaul, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present lis is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP (T) No. 7712 of 2008, titled as Paras Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 19.5.2009. He also argued that his client was entitled for regularization with effect from 25.9.1996 instead of 25.6.1997 and his client has already made representation to respondent No.2 with regard to regularization with effect from 25.9.1996. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Consequently, the present writ petition is disposed of with the following directions: i) Respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner as per principle laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove; ii) Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the representation made by the petitioner vide Annexure P-3. 3. Needful be done within a period of three months after the production of certified copy of this judgment alongwith copy of writ petition by the petitioner. No costs. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 19.10.2011 *awasthi*