IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2007 / 27TH ASHADHA 1929 RP. No. 128 of 2007(C) --------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.37828/2003 Dated 11/12/2006 ..................................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 2 TO 7 IN THE WPC: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YASODHARAN V., CHIRTHALAYKKAL VEEDU, NOW RESIDING AT ARYA BHAVAN, PEROORKHARAZHMA, CHARUMOODU P.O. 2. REMANAN N., OTTAMAVULLATHIL VEEDU, VEDARAPLAVU, VEDARAPLAVU P.O., CHARUMOODU. 3. RAJAN G., ASARIYATHU KIZHAKKETHIL VEEDU, PEROORKHARAZHMA, CHARUMOODU P.O. 4. VIJAYAN N.K., NAMBIARKULANGARA VEEDU, PADANILAM, PADANILAM P.O., NOORANAD. 5. VIKRAMAN N.K., NAMBIARKULANGARA VEEDU, PADANILAM, PADANILAM P.O., NOORANAD. 6. HARIKUMAR S., PATHISSERIL VEEDU, THAMARAKKULAM, THAMARAKKULAM P.O., MAVELIKKARA. BY ADV. SRI. B. SURESH KUMAR RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER & THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN THE WPC: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. PRASAD R., PUTHENPURACKAL, ERUMAKUZHI, NOORANAD P.O., MAVELIKKARA. 2. THE LABOUR COURT, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI. BECHU KURIAN THOMAS. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.V. MANOJ. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- Review Petition No. 128 OF 2007 IN W.P. (C) NO. 37828 OF 2003 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of July, 2007. O R D E R This review petition is filed at the instance of the respondents 2 to 7 in W.P.(C) No. 37828/2003. The writ petition was filed challenging an interim order in C.P. No. 81/1992. It is pointed out in the review petition that by the time the judgment was rendered by this Court, final order in the main petition itself was passed and that is the subject matter of the Writ Petition No. 12283/2005. None of the parties to the writ petition pointed out such a development to this Court. 2. Be that as it may, since the order under challenge in the writ petition did not survive at the time of disposal of the writ petition, it was not necessary for this Court to render a judgment on merits. Accordingly, review petition is allowed. The judgment dated 11.12.2006 in Writ Petition No. 37828/2003 is recalled. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp