IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 17TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 4362 of 2008(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SHIMY TOMY,W/O.SHRI.C.G.TOMY CHANDANAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KOONAMMAVU, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN SMT.NISHA BOSE RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. KOTTUVALLY GRAMA PANCHAYAT KOONAMMAVU, VALLUVALLY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY KOTTUVALLY GRAMA PANCHAYAT KOONAMMAVU, VALLUVALLY. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 4362 of 2008 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of February , 2008 JUDGMENT I find some genuineness in the grievance voiced by the petitioner. The petitioner is the owner of three cents of land with three shop rooms by virtue of Ext.P1 sale deed. A substantial portion of the land and a portion of one of the shop rooms had been surrendered by the petitioner for the widening of N.H.17. After such surrender, certain renovations were done by the petitioner to the three rooms including the room portion of which had to be surrendered for widening the road. After doing the renovations, the petitioner submitted Ext.P4 request before the Secretary of the Panchayat for assignment of new door numbers and for issuance of ownership certificate. Ext.P4 was submitted by the petitioner way back in First December 2006. Since there was no response to Ext.P4, the petitioner submitted Ext.P6 before the Chairman of the Finance Standing Committee. The petitioner submitted Ext.P6 on 17.11.2007 and her grievance is that there is no response even to Ext.P6. 2. In the nature of the order which is being passed hereunder, it is not necessary that notice should be issued to the respondents. I WPC No.4362/2008 2 dispose of this Writ Petition directing the 2nd respondent to take up Ext.P4 immediately, consider the same in the light of the various grounds raised in the Writ Petition, hear the petitioner and take an early decision. Decision, as directed above, shall be taken by the 2nd respondent at the earliest and at any rate within one month of receiving a copy of this judgment together with a copy of this Writ Petition. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. dpk