s^m ^eno^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR _^^c._co CONTEMPT^E3^0N' N0. ^\ / 2011 PETITIQNER ^^^'^E^-^' .vQ^^ ^ ~o(6' RESPONDENTS ^^8a.>r;'iT --"^^ ^, ^ Kishan Patel, S/o Shri Tilak Ram Patel, Aged about 57 years, R/o Khariyar Road, Distt. Nuapada (Orissa) VERSUS 1. Shri Sunil Kum.ar Sharma, Divl. Forest Officer, Mahasainund-(C.G.) ManoJ Chandrakar, Range Officer, Baghbahera, Distt. Mahasamund-(C.G-) APPLICATION U/S 12 OF THE CONTEMFT OF COURTS ACT READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 2. -4.1<^^ y F S^^^. 1 |:I-HC-22 -3~^r ^ii<4i<yl'^. ^•aS^<i<o. f<s)i<ni^li< STlif^T 'CRT^ ..(?.c?.^Kfj.aj../..2^)", '''"^Ft 200 ^[PT^tT9h^(<3b '^R^ST' ^TI^T^T ^^) ^flt^T 5h^Jch ^tit^ ^- 'snc^r ^<n^T( ^rft^ SB: HON»BLB8HRI MANINDRA IfdOHAN 8HRIVASTAVA.J. 25.T.2011 couilisel predece^sors be4n Shd Prafall Bharal, counse] Shri Maneesh Sharma, At fhe outset, learaed coun^ that the letters dated 4.10.201(D, which were issued by fhe been finaUy wifhdrawn vide mem^) memo dated 23.4.2011 has Court. There is no reason to disbfc bar by leamed counsel for the iaclined to proceed further ia fhe Leamed counsel for ftie copy of letter dated 23.4.2011[ petitioner, chi^i<n^'ri TrTTT^ff ^ 'fe^t <F3i<^i< ^r'stf^ ^n^r for fhe petitioner. for the respoudents. ^el for fhe respondents stated , 15.11.2010 and 5.1.2011, of rcspondent No. 1 have dated 23.4.2011. A copy of placed for perusal of the ?Ueve the statenient inade at ii. Thercfore, I am not taatter, shaU also supply the to learaed counsel for fhe resbondents. rest)ondents Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge j-'i-f^ -^^