1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVUEW PETITION NO.43 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2436 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1210 OF 2007 Mr.Deepak Prabhakar Churi. Petitioner vs. Tanushree Pandit Respondent Mr.Bhardwaj along with Mr.Rokan P. Munjee for the petitioner. Ms.Veena Gowda for the respondent. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED : 16th April, 2009 P.C. This is a review against the interlocutory order dated 12.03.2009. Pursuance to Order dated 12.03.2009, admittedly, the petitioner/husband has not deposited any amount. That was a condition precedent for stay of execution proceedings which is pending till this date. The proposal of settlement in writing, if exchanges,s that may be considered along with Civil Application in question. The interim protection as granted stands vacated. 2. Even otherwise, considering the averments made, the review application against such interlocutory order, in the facts and circumstances of the case, when the Civil Application is pending, the prayer for modification of the amount as directed to be deposited, has no substance. There is no error on the on the face of the record. Therefore, it is dismissed. No costs. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.] V. MOHTA,J.]