IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 21ST MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 4334 of 2011(N) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ THAYAKATH MOHAMMED MAHAROOF @ THAYAKATH KACHERIKANDY MOHAMMED MAHAROOF, 'SUBAS', KANNOTHUMCHAL ROAD, EDACHOVVA, ELAYAVOOR, KANNUR-670 565. BY ADV. SRI.T.M.CHANDRAN, SRI.S.SUJITH, SRI.V.A.SASIDHARAN, SRI.JOSEPH ALBIN NEDUNTHALLY. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KANNUR-670 002. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANNUR-670 001. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANNUR-670 001. 4. SAHIDA VACHAPRATH, D/O.ASMA. V., AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, VACHAPRATH HOUSE, PAPPINISSERRY AMSOM DESOM, ILLIPPURAM, PAPPINISSERY WEST P.O., KANNUR-670 006. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.T.K. VIPINDAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/02/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JJ. ----------------------------------- W.P(C).No.4334 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 10th day of February, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. 1.Having regard to the nature of order being issued hereunder, notice to the 4th respondent dispensed with, preserving her right for re-hearing of the matter, if aggrieved. 2.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3. 3.The petitioner admits that he had married the 4th respondent. He says that he had pronounced thalak after one week of co-habitation. It is further stated that the 4th respondent is agitated by this and is using unlawful force against him who has three children through the first wife WPC.4334/11 2 who is stated to be no more. We are not impressed to take the view that there is any requirement for the writ court to call upon the 4th respondent to place her views on the matter. We are of the view that all disputes between the petitioner and the 4th respondent are to be worked out in competent jurisdiction. We further direct that respondents 1 to 3 will insure that any complaint of threat to the life or report of commission of any cognizable offence will be taken care of in accordance with law. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, Judge. kkb.10/2.