IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-30216 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 5th October, 2011 Rahul Arora … Petitioner Versus Central Bureau of Investigation … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. R.S. Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed aggrieved against the impugned order (Annexure P-2) dated 23rd September, 2011, wherein it has been stated that one defence witness has been examined and on the request of the counsel case has been adjourned to 29th September, 2011 for recording the defence evidence and arguments, if any. Learned counsel states that there is an apprehension that abruptly the defence evidence will be closed and parties will be called upon to address arguments. Counsel submits that the application (Annexure P-3) filed by him praying that certain witnesses be examined, has not received due attention of the Court. After perusing the contents of the petition and hearing counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the view that the present petition is premature. As and when an order closing the defence evidence is passed and the petitioner is deprived of examining any witness whom he thinks necessary, he may approach this Court. Criminal Misc. No. M-30216 of 2011 (O&M) With the observations made above, present petition is disposed of. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE October 5, 2011 rps 2