IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.59053-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 16, 2006 Sushil Kapoor ...PETITIONER VERSUS Sarabjit Kaur and others ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.V.K.Chaudhri, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.L.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr.N.S.Gill, AAG, Punjab. ... Petitioner Sushil Kapoor, apprehending his arrest in complaint dated 9.5.2005 titled as Sarabjit kaur V. Rajwinder Kaur and others under Sections ¾ of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Sections 323,148,149 IPC at P.S.Sadar Amritsar, pending in the court of Addl.CJM, Amritsar, has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C for grant of anticipatory bail. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner who was arrayed as accused No.5 in the complaint has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid complaint at the instance of respondent No.2 against whom petitioner is fighting long litigation. Counsel contends that even Shri P.C.Grover, who is having long standing at the bar, has also been arrayed as accused No.4. Counsel further contends that in terms of the interim order dated September 25, 2006, the petitioner had appeared before the trial Court and furnished his regular bail bonds which have been accepted and attested on 4.10.2006 and since then he is regularly appearing. These facts have not been disputed by the State counsel. In view of the above, the interim order dated September 25, 2006 is made absolute. November 16, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE