IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19961 of 2010 YADU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 24.06.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Amarpur (Fullidumar) P.S. No. 123 of 2009 for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the death of the deceased had taken place in the normal course and that there was nothing unnatural about it. He further submits that the marriage having taken place 20 years back and the fact that the couple had four daughters, out of whom, one died, itself shows that the conjugal life of the deceased was peaceful. He further submits that the allegation against the petitioner of killing his wife, that she failed to bear a son, after a lapse of 20 years of married life, itself substantiates the incorrectness in the 2 allegations. He further submits that the petitioner has remained in custody since 20.7.2009 and that most of the witnesses have been examined in the trial and who have not supported the prosecution case. Having regard to the circumstances aforesaid, let the petitioner namely, Yadu Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-IV, Banka in connection with S.T.No.988 of 2009 (arising out of Amarpur (Fullidumar) P.S. case No. 123 of 2009 subject to the condition that the petitioner would be attending the trial of the case on each and every date fixed in the trial and failure on his part to attend the trial on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the trial Court would confer liberty to the Court concerned to initiate proceeding for cancellation of his bail bond and for taking him into custody. Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)