IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID FRIDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2011 / 28TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 3752 of 2011(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- ABDUL RUSSAK , M/S. ELECTROTEC INDUSTRIES, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, SOUTH KALAMASSERY. BY ADV. MR.ASP.KURUP MR.SADCHITH.P.KURUP RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. PARAVOOR MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE PARAVOOR, KOLLAM REP BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, PARAVOOR MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPAL OFFICE PARAVOOR, KOLLAM. ADV. SRI.AYYAPPAN SANKAR FOR R1 & 2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 3752 of 2011(T) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: INVOICE NO.138 DTD. 5.8.2008 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO R2. EXT.P2: INVOICE NO.170 DTD. 13.8.2008 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO R2. EXT.P3: LETTER DTD. 6.10.2010 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO R2. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL ..... // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.3752 Of 2011 ---------------------- Dated this the 19th day of August, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is the proprietor of Electrotech Industries engaged in the sales and supply of various electrical items. The writ petition is filed for a direction commanding respondents 1 & 2 to make payment of Rs.1,27,405/- to the petitioner. 2. The case of the petitioner is that pursuant to Exts.P1 & P2 invoices, the petitioner supplied various electrical goods to the respondents, but, the respondents have so far not paid the price of the goods to the petitioner. It is submitted that respondents are duty bound to pay the amount mentioned in Exts.P1 & P2 since they have already purchased and used the goods to their satisfaction. Exts.P1 & P2 shows that the goods were supplied during 2008. The petitioner submitted that in spite of repeated demands, no steps have been taken by the respondents to pay the amount due to the petitioner. According to the petitioner the total amount payable by the respondents is Rs.1,27,405/-. ::2:: W.P.(C).No.3752 Of 2011 3. Going by the facts of this case, this Court notice that there is no justification for not making payment due to the petitioner. In spite of notice issued by this Court respondents 1 & 2 have not cared to enter appearance and defend the case. In these circumstances, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner and pass orders within a period of three weeks from today. The writ petition is disposed of as above. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent for further action. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-