1 caf3166 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3166 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.727 OF 2009 Smt.Veena Gul Chainani ...Applicant vs. Bank of India, Pune ...Respondent Mr.S.R.Ronge for the applicant Mr.P.P.Tipnis i/b M/s.Consulta Juris for the respondent CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : AUGUST 5, 2011 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. Perused the order dated 7 th July 2010 passed by this Court in Civil Application no.1690 of 2010. By the said order, the Division Bench has already permitted the applicant to withdraw the amount subject to compliance with certain conditions which are incorporated in paragraph 3 of the said order. The condition was of furnishing solvent security and filing undertaking. It is obvious that it is for the Registrar (Judicial-I) to verify whether the applicant has complied with the order of the Division Bench. The applicant will have to satisfy the Registrar (Judicial-I) that the security offered is solvent security as directed by this Court. Hence, it is not necessary to grant any relief in this application. Application is disposed of. 2 caf3166 2 The learned counsel for the original appellant raised an objection that this application should have been placed before the Division Bench. The said objection has been raised by ignoring the fact that the High Court Appellate Side Rules have been amended enhancing the jurisdiction of the Single Judge. JUDGE