1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR M.C.A. (Review) No.449 of 2008 in W.P.No.5571 of 2007 (D) (Sudhakar s/o. Ganesh Guru .vs. State & Ors.) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= CORAM : D.D.Sinha and Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, JJ. DATE : 29.04.2008. Heard Mr. A.H.Lohiya, Adv. for the Applicant and Mr.V.A.Thakare, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Present review petition is moved by the review petitioner seeking review of the order dt. 18.3.2008. We have considered the contentions canvassed by the learned counsel and perused the impugned order passed. Perusal of the impugned order clearly shows that the facts mentioned by the petitioner in the petition as well as in the affidavit dt. 31.1.2008 filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 and 3 are reflected in the order dt. 18.3.2008, which were not controverted by the present review petitioner by filing any other affidavit on record and therefore, on the basis of these undisputed facts, the issue was concluded by the Division Bench of this Court and therefore, in our considered view, no case is made out for showing 2 indulgence. Hence, the review petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE ssj