IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. 3253 of 2010. Decided on 5th January, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Geeta Devi. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Ms. Sheetal Khimta, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. None for respondent No. 5. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): In view of the averments contained in paragraph No. 5 of the reply filed by respondents No. 1 to 3, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner within a period of two months by constituting a Departmental Promotion Committee. In case the petitioner is found suitable, she will promoted from the date her juniors have been promoted, with all consequential benefits. 2. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. Copy dasti, on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge January 05, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. - 2 - - 3 - `