1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms. Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.13082 of 2011 1 ANBALAGAN 2 KUMARASAMY ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VEDACHANDUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. CR.NO. 374/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.FARHATHULLAH Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 and 2 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b),324, 379(NP) and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.374 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that because of family dispute the maternal aunt of A1 given a false complaint against the petitioners which was registered under Sections 294(b),324, 379(NP) and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.374 of 2011 and the investigation is considerably over. He further submits that the injured already discharged from the hospital and hence, they pray for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.Refuting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) would submit that because of family dispute while drawing water the occurrence took place and they snatched 9 sovereign of gold chain and caused injury. He fairly conceded that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides, it is seen that the alleged occurrence took place on 22.09.2011 while drawing water from the common well, the de-facto complainant is none other than the maternal aunt of A1 and the injured discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vedachandur, and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 29/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VEDASANTHUR. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL. 3. INSPECTOR OF POLICE VEDACHANDUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. M.FARHATHULLAH Advocate SR.No.34105 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13082 of 2011 Date :29/09/2011 RJ/30.9.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/