IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32657 of 2011 Md. Naki @ Tinku @ Md. Naqui, son of Md. Zaki @ Fuji, Resident of Siya Maszid Lane opposite Dental hospital P.M.C.H. Muradpur, P.S. – Pirbabore, District – Patna. ------- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Nahid Prvin, wife of Md. Naki @ Naki @ Tinku, D/o – Ajahar Hussin o fSah Ki Imli, P.S. – Khajekalan, District – Patna. ---------Opposite Parties. *********** 02. 18.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 999(C) of 2010 for offences under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 4 of the D.P. Act, is named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Submission is that petitioner is ready and willing to resume and continue matrimonial relationship with the complainant who is one and only wife and mother of solitary child. The complainant Opposite Party no. 2 who appeared voluntarily and learned counsel representing her submits that she is also ready to resume family life, but it is the rigid approach of petitioner which works as hurdle. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of petitioner filing an application before the court below stating such intention/parties files joint petition of compromise and in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Complaint Case No. 999(C) of 2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled, further additional condition in case of filing individual petition on behalf of the petitioner the court below on getting positive response from the complainant or filing joint petition of compromise permit the parties to reside at their place of choice and report personally on the date fixed for the purpose and only after being satisfied of their conduct for a reasonable period court below shall pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)