IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3321 of 2011 PRAMOD KUMAR SAHNI, SON OF JODHAN SAHNI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SATGHATTA, P.S. GAIGHAT, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. ---------- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. KIRAN DEVI, WIFE OF PRAMOD KUMAR SAHNI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SATGHATTA, P.S.- GAIGHAT, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR, AT PRESENT AT KANHAULI MOHAN SAHNI TOLA, P.S.- MITHANPURA, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. --------- OPP. PARTIES ----------- 2 10.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The marriage was performed in the year 1998. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that he is ready to keep the informant as wife with full dignity and honour. Hence, the accusation is not deliberated. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, 2 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., (East), Muzaffarpur in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 181/2005, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Let the learned court below accept the bail bond of the petitioner provisionally, and issue notice to the complainant and fix a date for their appearance when the petitioner will take back the complainant to her matrimonial house to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour. The bail bond of the petitioner will be finally accepted in two eventualities if (i) the matrimonial harmony is restored or (ii) the informant refuses to accompany the petitioner. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)