1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8370 OF 2009 The Deonar Nagrik Sahakari Grahak Mandal Ltd. .. Petitioner. Vs. The Deputy Controller of Rationing & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.M.M.Vashi i/b M.P.Vashi & Associates for the petitioner. Mr.R.M.Patne A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 2. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE, J. DATED : 11TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition challenges the order dated 11.9.2009 passed by respondent no.1 by which the petitioners’ authorisation for running a ration shop has been suspended. The State has filed reply affidavit and in paragraph 14 thereof they have stated that final order has yet not been passed by respondent no.1. Respondent No.1, according to learned A.G.P., will pass final order after due inquiry and site inspection within a period of two weeks from today. In view of the statement I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order at this stage and I am satisfied that the following order shall meet the ends of justice: 2 Respondent No.2 shall pass final order after following the due procedure and after giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The petitioners to produce a copy of this order before respondent no.1 within a period of one week from today. Respondent No.1 shall decide the case on merits in accordance with law. All contentions of the parties are kept open. The writ petition is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)