IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2080 of 2007 JIRIA DEVI, WIFE OF SRI HIRA LAL MEHTA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BHAPTIYAHI, POLICE STATION-BHAPTIYAHI AND DISTRICT-SUPAUL. ………………………………PETITIONER…DEFENDANT. Versus 1. JAGESHWAR PASWAN, SON OF LATE DHARMA PASWAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BISHANPUR TOLA DAHUPATTI, P.S. BHAPTIYAHI, DISTRICT- SUPAUL. ……………… PLAINTIFF/OPPOSITE PARTY IST SET. 2. SATYA NARAYAN SAH SON OF LATE HIRA SAH. 3. OM PRAKASH SAH. 4. JAI PRAKASH SAH. 5. DURGA SAH. 6. KAILASH SAH. OPP. PARTY 3 TO 6 S/O LATE BILLAT SAH. 7. BHAGWAN LAL SAH. 8. MAHENDRA SAH. BOTH SONS OF JAHURI SAH. 9. RANJAN SAH SON OF LATE YOGNEDRA SAH. 10. JAGESHWAR SAH SON OF DARBARI SAH. O.P. NO.2 TO 10 RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SIMRAHI BAZAR, P.S. RAGHOPUR, DISTT- SUPAUL. 11. SHIBU SAH. 12. ARUN SAH. 13. ASHOK SAH. ALL ARE SONS OF ASHARFI SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SIMRAHI BAZAR, P.S.RAGHOPUR, DISTT- SUPAUL. 14. MUNNA SAH. 15. PAPPU SAH. 16. DILIP SAH, ALL SONS OF LATE SARYUG SAH, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE –SIMRAHI BAZAR, P.S.RAGHOPUR, DISTT-SUPAUL, AT PRESENT R/O VILLAGE-GANGJALA, P.S. AND DISTT-SAHARSA. ………………………DEFENDANT 1ST SET/O.P. 2ND SET. 17. SATYA NARAYAN MEHTA SON OF LATE PUNIT LAL SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BISHUNPUR TOLA DABUPATTI, P.S. BHAPTIYAHI, DISTRICT-SUPAUL ……………DEFENDANT 3RD SET/ OPP.PARTY 3RD SET. --------- - 2 - 2. 29.3.2010. Mr. Amrti Abhijat, learned counsel for the petitioner appears and informs that the concerned Title Suit No.27 of 2003 has already been disposed of. Thus, it is contended that this Civil Revision has become infructuous. In that view of the matter, this Civil Revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)