IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18909 of 2008 AVINASH SINGH @ AVINASH KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SRI KAUSHLESHWAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MADHOPUR, P.S. SHAHPUR, DISTT. PATNA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 01.04.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved with the order dated 12.1.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. V, Patna, by which he has dismissed Criminal Revision No. 460 of 1998 filed against the order dated 16.7.1998 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, in Danapur (Shahpur) P.S. Case No. 164 of 1996 by which he has taken cognizance only under Section 147 and 148 of the Indian Penal Code but not under Section 307, 395, 323, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. In my view, even at the later stage if the court concerned is of the view that an offence under any Section apart from those which are mentioned in the order of cognizance is made out, he can pass appropriate orders. In view of such, the application is disposed off with the aforesaid observations. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)