IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13570 of 2009 Date of decision:17.12.2009 Rajvinder Bhatti and another ...Petitioners Versus Central Bank of India, Chander Mukhi, Nariman point, Mumbai and another. ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. Mukesh Kumar Bhatnagar, Advocate, for the petitioner None for the respondents. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) 1. There was already a direction issued at the time when the Court issued notice of motion on 02.09.2009 that an amount of Rs. 1,10,000/- shall be deposited with the Bank within two weeks and that the remaining amount shall be deposited in instalments, as may be fixed by the respondent-Bank. It is admitted by the counsel for the respondent that the deposit was not made. It is contended by him that he is prepared to make the deposit but the Bank is not accepting the same. Any offer to do an act beyond the time which is granted already by this Court cannot be accepted. Indeed there is not even a written application for extension of time already been granted by this Court. The order dated 02.09.2009 Civil Writ Petition No.13570 of 2009 - 2 - is in some sense is self-contained in that it states that if the amount is not deposited within the time granted by the Court, the writ petition would be dismissed with costs. 2. The writ petition is dismissed as such. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 17.12.2009 sanjeev