IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43009 of 2008 UMESH RAVIDAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 13.1.2009 Heard Sri Farookh Ahmad Khan, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is not named in the FIR of a case under Section 364, 395 etc IPC. The name of the petitioner came for the first time on 23.7.2006 in paragraph 83 of the case diary. Besides, the victim who was recovered by the police also named the petitioner in his statement. The contention is that the statement of the victim boy was not recorded by the police just after his recovery and he was handed over to his parents after seven days on 26.7.2006. The victim made a statement stating that it was this petitioner who used to protect him from the ire of the criminals. It is contended that similarly situated accused, namely, Uday Yadav who was named by the accused persons has been granted bail by Annexure-2. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in Sono P.S.Case No.69 of 2006. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )