IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 12TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 23RD MAGHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 1200 of 2007(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.22896/2003 Dated 04/11/2003 .................... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS NO.1,3,6,8 TO 10, 14 & 16 ------------------------------------------------- 1. C.K.RAJAGOPALAN, S/O.GOVINDAN NAMBIAR, AGED 47 YEARS, PART TIME CASUAL SWEEPER,KRISHI BHAVAN OFFICE, BALUSSERRY, KOZHIKODE DIST. 2. E.V.BALAN, PART TIME CASUAL SWEEPER, KRISHI BHAVAN, CHEMANCHERRY, POST THRUVANNOOR, KOZHIKODE DIST. 3. ZAINU X.L., AGED 35 YEARS, W/O.BASHEER, PART TIME CASUAL SWEEPER, KRISHI BHAVAN, THIRUVAMBADY P.O., KOZHIKODE DIST. 4. KADEEJA V.P., AGED 50 YEARS, W/O.AHAMMADKUTTY, PART TIME CASUAL SWEEPER, KRISHI BHAVAN, PANNIKKODE, KOZHIKODE DIST. 5. O.SAFIYA, AGED 40 YEARS, W/O.AHAMMEDKUTTY, PART TIME CASUAL SWEEPER, KRISHI BHAVAN, KARASSERRY, KOZHIKODE DIST. 6. SUDHA N.P., AGED 39 YEARS, W/O.SREENIVASAN, PART TIME CASUAL SWEEPER, KRISHI BHAVAN, UNNIKULAM, EKAROOL P.O., KOZHIKODE DIST. 7. C.T.AYYAPPAN, AGED 40 YEARS, PART TIME CASUAL SWEEPER, KRISHI BHAVAN, KOODERANHI, KOZHIKODE DIST. COC NO.1200/07 -2- 8. P.K.VINODAN, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O PAYIMBRADI, PART TIME CASUAL SWEEPER, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL OFFICE, THAMARASSERRY, KOZHIKODE DIST. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT NO.1 ----------------------------- P.VIKRAMAN, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =================== Cont.Case(C) NO. 1200 OF 2007 S ============================= Dated this the 12 th day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T The contempt alleged is that of disobedience of Annexure I judgment. It is stated by the petitioners that three of the petitioners had filed Contempt case before this court and obtained Annexure IV order and by issuing Annexure V Government order, the benefit of the judgment has been extended to those three persons. It is stated that the remaining petitioners have not been given the benefit of Annexure II judgment and there is absolutely no reason for such non payment. 2. I am satisfied that the respondent has not implemented the judgment in so far as the petitioners herein are concerned and the selective implementation of the judgment, may be for the reason that few of the petitioners had filed a Contempt case in this court, cannot be appreciated. COC 1200/07 :2 : 3. Therefore, if the respondent is keen of avoiding further action, he shall carry out the directions in Annexure II judgment within a period of six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Contempt case is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp