THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1517 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner claims to be the owner of land in Survey No.109 of Kukatpally Village, Kowdipally Mandal, Medak District. According to him, certain wrong entries were made in the revenue records showing that the land is poramboke and when the same was brought to the notice of the then Sub-Collector, Medak, issued in proceedings, dated 05.05.1959 observing that the description of the property as poramboke was not proper. It is stated that the said orders are confirmed by the District Collector, Medak on 06.01.1960. The petitioner states that ever since then, the correction was not made. He made a representation, dated 17.12.2009 to the Tahsildar, Kowdipally Mandal, second respondent herein, to enter his name in the relevant columns in this regard. His grievance is that no action has been taken thereon. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. The petitioner has now placed before this Court, copies of the proceedings, dated 05.05.1959 and 06.01.1960. However, the relief claimed by him in the representation, dated 17.12.2009 mainly related to entering his name in the column relating to possession. Under the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971, the name of the pattadar or owner of the land virtually remains constant in the revenue records unless modified on account of transfer or by operation of law, whereas the entries in the column relating to possession will be changed depending on the ground situation. The claim made by the petitioner as regards possession has absolutely nothing to do with the entries as to ownership. Therefore, the petitioner has to make separate and different representation indicating the actual correction and nature of record. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to make appropriate representation to the respondents duly pointing out the nature of the relief he wants and by making reference to the proceedings as well as the provisions of law. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J 1st FEBRUARY, 2010. kvni