MC 660/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K. MERUNO Heard Mr. H. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner in this misc. case. Office note dated 19/4/2011 indicates that service of notice upon the respondent Nos 1,2 and 4 have been duly served and ready as regard to service of notice. R espondent No.2 has been deleted from the list of the respondents. By this applic ation, the applicant is praying for condonation of delay of 65 days in filing th e instant appeal. Though notice upon the respondent Nos 1,2 and 4 have been duly served, none appear for the said respondents. The grounds for condoning the del ay has been sufficiently and properly explained in para 3 of this misc.applicati on and on perusal of the same, the delay of 65 days is hereby condoned. Misc.case stands disposed accordingly.