IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18263 of 2008 DINESH TIWARY & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.5.2008. The two petitioners who were then employees of M/s. Ideal Auto Credit Limited, the financiers of the truck purchased by the informant, are sought to be prosecuted in Munger(Muffasil) P.S. Case No.185 of 2005 under Sections 364/384/34 I.P.C. The petitioners had initially moved before the learned Sessions Judge in A.B.A. No.168 of 2007 for anticipatory bail and while disposing of the same vide order dated 11.9.2007, the learned Sessions Judge directed the petitioners to approach the learned court below for regular bail. Their prayer for anticipatory bail was not rejected by the Sessions Court but disposed of. However, since a compromise had been arrived at between the parties and the truck has already been released in favour of the complainant and in view of the law that the hirer cannot claim any ownership over the vehicle until and unless the entire amount is paid and the ownership will remain with the financiers-company, in the event of the petitioners filing a petition for bail the learned court below will dispose of the same in the light of the observations made above. With the aforesaid observations, this application is disposed of. P.S. (Abhijit Sinha,J)