IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6184 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:23.09.2010 Balbir Singh ....Petitioner versus Karnail Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? ---- K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. Having regard to the nature of order which is proposed to be passed, I dispense with the notice to the respondents. 2. On a request by the petitioner for one more opportunity for letting in evidence, the trial Court held that five 'last opportunities' had been given and he had still not completed his evidence. I do not find any error in the order. Still having regard to the contention made that the petitioner's son was unwell on that date and therefore he could not be present, I afford to the petition one last opportunity for production of all the evidence at his own risk on 01.11.2010 on condition that he pays Rs.2,500/- to the defendant within 10 days. The impugned order is set Civil Revision No.6184 of 2010(O&M) - 2 - aside and the revision is allowed on the above terms. If the amount of Rs.2,500/- is not paid within the time stipulated, the opportunity granted shall be taken as rejected and the order will be taken as confirmed. 3. The revision is disposed of on the above terms. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 23.09.2010 sanjeev