'S^ ^1<11<?»^, ^rfrffTg', Rfc>iyy< M|t<rtl *t<l<b ^ 200 an^?r irag; (ijcif^^) sn^i.^i R-ii*,': ^tirsn^i ^i»w. WIRIT ^firr sii^i HIGHCOURTOF WritPetiU FETITIOiSER J VE-I^US RESPONDEnT^ 1. 2. Di Di StE La' Bh (Cl 3. Viil B^ Di Sui -t. 5, Ja Wrii; PetttJ PETITIONBRS ...».-....l.. RESPONDBNTS 0<| Rl J4 2, Nl a| Bf (Cf VERSUS i, Tri. Sej< D^ ^IAlt<n4l'1 'HFToTf ^f l^1^ ^^IK '^afRm^sn^l CHHAT-TISGARH AT BIL^FuR n (Civill Np. 6(S3{WQ7 ^seph Lakra, son of Late Johan Lakra, °d about 70 yeara, resident of l.glclia., TahsU Baglelia, Disti'ict (siipur tUJtitiattisgarJi) trict and Sessions Judge, trict Raigarb (Cbhattisgsj-h) Kaigarh, |ite of Chhatnsgarh, fhrough Secretai-y, aad Lcgal Departjnent, D.K.S. [awan, G.E. Road, Raipur ^liattisgarh) ay Gupta, Advocate And Notary, Tahsil §icha, District .Jashm.ir (ChIiaTtisgarh) ip Kunjiar SliiliQ., son of Sliii B.K. iha, Advocate aad Notary, Main Road, ?cha, P.0. and Tahsil Bagicha, ita-ict Jashpur (CG) 496224 >nam Chand Murari, Son. Of Shri [iasu Sao, Ncai T;±hsuCouil Bagiuua, Road, TahsU Bagicha.Distri.et ihpur (Chhatdsgarh) 496224 on jCivlU So. 644/2008 uUi Ral! Ul< Po{ Kaji ABlibiKapur ijay Kuinar Suiha, S/o Shri Jogendra asad Siulia, agcd auou.1 47 ycai's, ;upation Advocate, R/o viuage dkera, Tahsil Bagicba, District ihpur (CG) •elkantli G'-lpta, S/o Shri Gupta, aged out years, occupauon- Aavocatc, K/O igicha, Ta_hsil Bagicha, Distt, -Jashpiir G) State of Ch.Iiattisgarh, through tiie :rctaiy, Law | ana Legisiamre igrt-mcTit D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipiir (CG) GRPR.I — FS/246—2/2007 — 50.000. ^a:t^sf^s^ ^ltif^?:!^!^:^^'.;; liSljllllSlt*?' 3:EcTS?T'TC53T, S7fkTT1?, fsfc'iltiy *<Wdl **41* -H^ 200 an^r iraq; ( aH^r.^lft-fi* WII 3II^[ st>t|i;b TOflWHfel SD^T 2. Distfict d. 4. 5. nisti Vijaj Bagi^ Diliyj TaJi; Pood notal (CG)| aact yessions Juctge, Kaigarli, }. Raigarb (CG) Qupta, Advocate And Notary, Taasii ^ha., District Jashpur (Chhattisgarli) Kuiuai' Siuua, Advocatc aud Notaiy, jil Bagicha, District Jashpur <,C(^._ ^ Chand Murari, Advo^iite arFd ^y, Tahsu Bagiclia, Distt. Jashpur PRBSEKT SuriSuiulSaiiu, Aul Sinha aad NeeIkantJli yitn M.B. Agrawal, Agrawal, Adyocate fij Shri P.P. Saliu, Adv< No. 605.3/2007. Shri B.D. Guru, Adv| Siaha aad Poona-m §uriSiuiiesh Bajaj, o 11- Duircauta niisiu"a, j. W.P. (C) No. 6053/2007 p. No. 644/2008 prelerred by Anja: are being disposed of by fhi; 2003 passed by District aad appncauon/ meinonal submitte^ yessions Juclge, Kaigarii vicle pctober, 2002 uivited appUca +l'i|[<-f''fl-< tIIlRTT'? ^S {hW,< iTSTfTiTsn^f ocalc for Uic pctitiuiicrs Ajay Ktiuicu |r. Advocate with Shri Paakaj ^r the petitiQner Joseph Lakra. icate for respondent No. 3 in 'w.P.(C) Dcate tor respondents ump lYuinar ^hand Mi_ira_ri. 3-ovt. Advocatc for &e State. <.D B R 6-20081 sten-ect by Josepii LaKra aiicl W.f.(<J} Kumar Sinha and Neelkaiith Gupta comaioo orcter as ui boUi tnese petitions, the petitiouers have itnpugned the order dated 19ta Aj.;it, yessions Judge, Kaigarti tiUng Uie by Uieia lor appouitinent as notary at Bagicha. 2. The grievauce of the pe|tiuouers are that the District ai-id memo ol Annexure P-1 ctate^t lal .ons (lueuiorial) fi-oin the desirous GRPRJ—FS/246—2/2007— 50.000. .//,.-... KBBII , -P K 3'EsT.^TraT^r, •ci'Tfly'iti, RttT'ii'Hy BsiS8SKjJI:j;1;B^^^^:'''''''''''''"'''''''-'"'"''"''"~''''''"" •SSIflJlii:^' • • ^lI'Jlti' ' ' St^fT IRW (4c<4«<i4ET) "Siiff^'S^1^ affIT-38K% aiHRi' ^^ ^aiWHfet sn^i members tor appouitineu.t ot Notanes m Bagicna Uirougn Wj llie appiicaats submitted meut 'SRTEfeifrT Wq?JT-q'-fe^t TfSRSIT ^sifgiign^i I'iotary against fhree vacaat posts of l-'resident, Bar Association, BagicQa. niemorial ia Uie prescribed proforma along wifh iteeessary docuinenjts, however the saiae was iUed by titie District and Sessions Judge Association, Bagicfaa fhat ag^inst fhe sancuoned posts ot fhree Notaries ia Bagicha Tahsil, worKuig as Notary. 3. 1'tie oiUy grouna raised are that Rule 6 of fhe Nota4ies Rules, 1956, ftie appiication for appouitinent of Notary is requ)red to be processed by the competent auttiority who in tum shaU e; satisfied thaC the applicant specified under Rule 3 or thal taiuiae the applications. Where hc is |does not possess fhe qualificatioiis Uis previous applicanon was rejectecl niake report to tjie appropna reject fhe appBcafion under Ri 1956. However, in t&e iastant have beea rejected uader sub-1 contt-ary to fhe Rule 7 and Rul| pn ttie basis ot i-eport ot 1'afasu Bar espoadents No.; 3 to 5 are ati'eady y Uie peuuoners ui boUi Uie peuuons wiuun SK monfhs before fhe c[ate of appUcation, he can. reiect it. He is duty bound to hold enqu4y after giving oppoi-tunity of making representation to fhe appucafit agamst any objection, ri any, aad Govenunent on Uie representaUon and the appropriate Govemiijient is only empowered to accept or ile (1) ofRule 8 ot'the Notanes Kules, ;ase, fhe appucation of fhe petitioners rule (1) ofRule 8 ol the Notanes Kules aud fhe same have been Uled ^y learued Distnct ancl yessions Juctge 8 ot the Notanes Kuies, ly&fci, GR.PRJ — FS/246—2/2007:- 50,000. ysssss^ KBRIM8BE K18UJi fc:?^ ^:f'll^£ ^i'::'l:;':: jS@||BjjB|Sjj- i-h;t:;E1 3^r ^ 1^11^, ®rfl<H'lQ,isj^l^y ^IM^I *NI<* ^ 200 3W^V 'tRW ( ljc<l^«l<8T) SII^.W ft-iiSr; iWsn^I shi-IW f; -« ?RIRR ^lft^ SIlt^T 4. rrom ttie avermeiits appoBitiaent proceeduig wa; appointuient ot notary at tiagi issuauce of certiBcate for area to which it relates for a p< the certificate is issued to hini. 5. Leamed counsel for fiif did not dispute that the total is three aad fhe resRQiidentsj Sinfaa aiid Shri Poonam Chan<l Talisu Bagicha and the the peUUoners uu Uie yeai' ^UL) Dy me pennoners on t>-y-2< ah-eady pokited out that the c^ a period ofoyears, the petitio) by flie petitioneis tbr also agam.st ttie appouitment Diiip Kumar Siaha and Shi^ worJang as Notanes ui me y( subject inatter ot Uie peunon; witn Uie lapse ol time aiid ac<f wiUiout gomg uito Uie inents o|l applicjations appouitqieut •^[^[d41-1 'RFTctf ^' 'fe'i^t <ni^l< ^T37f;N.3T]^T u|t t&e peuuon, it is clear Uiat me initiatecl ui tlie year 2UU<i tor ;lia. yub-rule 4 iot KuJe K provictes tor Not^Lryr authorizing hiiTi to practice ^i •^)e „ jriod of 5 years ti'oin the date on which peUUoners appeanng tor peunoners n|uniber ofvacancy of Notai-y ia Bagicha Shri Vijay Gupta, Shri Dilip Kuniar Muranwere appotatecl as Notanes lor iplicjations (lueinorials) were subltutted by 2. These two petitions have been filed p07 and 29-1-2008 respectively. As atUicate ol Motanes may be issuea tor is pertaia to the inemonals subinitted as Notaries ia tbe year 2002 and of respondents Shri Vijay Gupta, Shri Poonam Chaad Murari who wer<i :ar 2002-Q3. In these cu~cunistaaces7 having becoine stale aad infructuoua' ordmgly, fhe petitions aj-e disposed ot~ Uie clispute. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge GRPRJ — FS/2t6—2/2007— 50.000. Ki-s'^ agBKSSEIiK"