IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16438 of 2009 DINESH KORA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 01.09.2009 Sole petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Section 302 of the Penal Code. It is submitted that similarly placed co-accused has been granted the privilege of bail. In this regard he draws attention of this court to the order dated 15.04.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 431 of 2009 annexure-2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that name of the petitioner also transpired through the confessional statements of co-accuseds, namely, Shambhu and Ranjan. It appears that the petitioner carries criminal antecedents. Considering the fact that similarly placed co-accused has been privileged with bail, this court is persuaded to extend the same privilege to the petitioner. Let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. Munger in connection with Dharhara P.S.Case no. 47 of 2007 subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the 2 petitioner (ii) The petitioner shall appear before the officer-in-charge of Dharhara P.S. or any officer-in-charge of the said police station once in a month for a period of 05 months from the date of his release. In case of default in such appearance before the officer-in-charge same shall be promptly report to the trial court/court in seisin of the case whereafter it shall be open to the trial court to cancel his bail bond and secure his arrest in accordance with law. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)