1 Civil Appln.No.1315+04 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD C.A.NO.1315 OF 2010 IN F.A.[ST] NO.27530 OF 2009 WITH C.A.NO.1317 OF 2010 IN F.A.[ST] NO.27533 OF 2009 C.A.NO.1319 OF 2010 IN F.A.[ST] NO.27439 OF 2009 C.A.NO.1321 OF 2010 IN F.A.[ST] NO.27543 OF 2009 C.A.NO.1641 OF 2010 IN F.A.[ST] NO.2905 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.D.V.Soman, Advocate for Applicants in all matters.. Shri.S.K.Naikwade,Advocate for R.No.1. Shri V.H.Dighe,A.G.P.for respondent-State .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 25TH JUNE, 2010. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and respondents. 2. The present applications are filed by the applicants for condonation of delay caused in preferring the First Appeals. The learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondents submits that no proper explanation is put forth 2 Civil Appln.No.1315+04 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders by the applicants to condone the delay. 3. Perused the record. Considering the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, we find that the delay caused in preferring the Appeals is satisfactorily explained. 4. Hence, the applications are allowed as prayed. Delay is condoned. Sd/- Sd/- [K.K. TATED,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] MTK