upa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6152 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6152 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6152 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.____ OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.____ OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.____ OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra ).. Applicant Versus Vardhman Tukumdas Gundecha and another ).. Respondents Mrs.P.H.Kantharia, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the Applicant. Mr.A.S. Kulkarni, Advocate, for Respondent No.1. CORAM : V.G.PALSHIKAR, Acg.C.J. & CORAM : V.G.PALSHIKAR, Acg.C.J. & CORAM : V.G.PALSHIKAR, Acg.C.J. & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 8TH SEPTEMBER 2006 DATED : 8TH SEPTEMBER 2006 DATED : 8TH SEPTEMBER 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the application for leave to appeal against the order of acquittal. 2. Perused the impugned order. The learned Judge has recorded the order of acquittal under Sections 409 and 477 of the Indian Penal Code. He has properly appreciated the evidence and has come to correct conclusions. There is, therefore, no reason to interfere. 3. Application for leave to appeal rejected.