ash 1 cp-150.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.150 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri Arvind Purohit i/by Mrs. Pallavi Potnis and Shri Arvind Potnis for the Petitioner. Shri A.I. Patel, AGP for Respondent No.5. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 8TH DECEMBER, 2011 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. The breach alleged is of the order dated 15th October, 2010 passed by a Division Bench of this Court. It is not in dispute that the amounts as per the said order have been released. The grievance of the Petitioner is that initially 76 bank guarantees were submitted before the Land Acquisition Officer and due to negligence on the part of the Land Acquisition Officer, the bank guarantees were cancelled by the concerned bank and by spending huge amounts, the Petitioner was required to furnish fresh bank guarantees. ash 2 cp-150.11 2. It appears to me that there is a substantial compliance with the order of Division Bench. The bank guarantees initially furnished by the Petitioner were cancelled by the bank and not by the Land Acquisition Officer. If there is any neglect on the part of the Land Acquisition Officer in performing his duties and consequently any loss is caused to the Petitioner, it is for the Petitioner to file appropriate proceedings for claiming appropriate damages in accordance with law. As the substantial compliance has been made with the impugned order, this is not a case where an action against the Respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 can be initiated. The Contempt Petition is disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J)