IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 22ND AUGUST 2008 / 31ST SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 20656 of 2006(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ B. PUSHPA, CHIRAYADI THALAKKAL VEEDU, KRUSHUMUTTOM P.O., PEYAD P.O., TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), TRIVANDRUM. 2. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF VILAPPIL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETEIS LTD.NO.2522, PEYAD, TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. 3. VILAPPIL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.2522, PEYAD, TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. DEEPU SREEKANTH, ATTENDER, VILAPPIL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., PEYAD, TRIVANDRUM. 5. GEETHAKUMARI, PEON, VILAPPIL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., PEYAD, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN FOR R.4 SMT.RESMI G. NAIR FOR R.4 SRI.BABU S. NAIR FOR R3 SRI.J.S.AJITHKUMAR FOR R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 20656 of 2006(H) ------------------------------------- A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER FROM THE THIRD RESPONDENT BANK DT. 4.6.2006. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATIONFILED BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DT. 20.3.2006. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY NO.C.P.(3) 19364/06 OF THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES DT. 23.5.2006. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION FILED BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN, SC/ST WELFARE SAMITHY DT. 28.6.2006. EXT.P5 : TRUE COY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DT. 25.7.2006. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.20656 of 2006 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 22nd August, 2008. J U D G M E N T The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayer : “Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, direction or order directing the first respondent to conduct due enquiry as directed in Ext.P3 as requested for in Ext.P5 and issue appropriate direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to appoint the petitioner as Peon.” In view of the stand taken in the counter affidavit filed by the third respondent, in case the petitioner has still any grievance left, she may produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and counter affidavit before the first respondent, in which case, the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent with notice to the petitioner and respondents 2 to 5, and appropriate action in accordance with will be taken to make up the 10% quota reserved for SC/ST, within another three months. The writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.20656 of 2006 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 22nd August, 2008.