HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAm-L BILASF’UR WP. ($1 Nommo? WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22$ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF lNDtA Appearance: Shri DR Patel, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumit Verma, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.1, 2, 4&5 Shri AS. Barik, Counsel for respondent No.3. ORAL GR3ER (19.12.2907) UNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, therefore, he is not pressing this petition anymore. The petition is dismissed, as not pressed. S PETITIONER Narottam Singh Patei, Sic iate Pitambar Singh Patei, Aged abcut 59 years, presehtiy posted aé Head MaSter at govt. higher secondary school, Jata?i, Tahsii arid District Raigarh (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Schooi Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3 The Accountant GeneraL Raipur (C.G.) 4. District Education Officer, Raigarh (C.G.) 5. Principai, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Jatari, Tahsii aria District Raigarh (cm