S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO. 245/2008 (Sohan Lal vs. Govind Narayan) DATE OF ORDER : 11/9/2008 HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.Vineet Sanadiya, for the appellant. Heard learned counsel. This second appeal has been filed by appellant-objector against the concurrent findings of two courts below rejecting his application under Order 21 Rule 97 and 103 read with Section 151 CPC. Both the courts below have found that appellant-objector kept on changing the name of the firm from Sohan Motors to Paras Motors and then to Pushpa Motors in the name of his close relatives, Sohan being his own name, Paras being his brother and Pushpa being his wife and appellant-objector was only trying to find way to defeat the execution of decree of eviction in question in favour of respondent. Having heard learned counsel and upon perusal of the impugned orders, this Court finds that the orders passed by both the courts below are based on relevant evidence and have rightly rejected the objections of the appellant. In view of above, no substantial question of law arises for consideration by this Court. The second appeal is found to be devoid of merit and same is accordingly dismissed. Copy of this order be sent to opposite party. (DR.VINEET KOTHARI), J. item no.s-1 baweja/-