IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.11292 of 2009 ***** Md.Azad @ Id Mohammad @ Ied Mohammad, son of Md. Muslim, resident of village- Sonak (Camp Tola), P.S.-Supaul, District-Supaul. …. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar …. …. Opposite party ----------- 2. 14.7.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is an accused in Saharsa (Sadar) P.S. Case No.41 of 2004 under Sections 393 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the F.I.R. was initially lodged against unknown persons but subsequently during course of investigation on the basis of confessional statement made by Indal Sharma the petitioner has been made an accused. It is further submitted that the said person has already been given the benefit of bail. Looking at the material or the evidence which has come, petitioner also deserves to be enlarged on bail. It is more a case of suspicion rather than hardcore evidence. In the totality of the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, namely, Md.Azad @ Id Mohammad @ Ied Mohammad, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa (Sadar) P.S. Case No.41 of 2004. One of the sureties shall be executed by Md. Muslim, that is the father of the petitioner on due identification by the Court below. It is - 2 - further recorded that the petitioner will cooperate and appear on each and every date during the course of trial. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)