THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.21321 of 2010 BETWEEN: Vaddiraja Rama Devi …. PETITIONER And 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others. …. RESPONDENTS ORDER: 1. The petitioner claims to be in possession of the house property bearing door No.8-2-311/B/3 situated in S.No.403 of Shaikpet Village and claims to have purchased the said property from one Smt. Batul Fatima against whom proceedings were conducted under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The proceedings against her are culminated in orders passed under Section 8(4) and the consequential proceedings under Section 9, 10(5) and 10(6) of the Act. The said proceedings were challenged in writ petition No.15997 of 2008 by one of the predecessors. This Court by order dated 23.03.2009 allowed the writ petition and set aside the impugned proceedings in so far as the petitioner was concerned. Subsequently, the said proceedings were also set aside in W.P.Nos.18751 of 2008 dated 9.02.2011 and 15947 of 2008 dated 14.02.2011. 2. Sri Dammalapati Srinivas and Smt. M. Siva Jyothi, learned Assistant Government Pleader fairly submit that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the orders in the aforesaid writ petitions since the same proceedings were under challenge in those writ petitions too. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and the submissions, this writ petition is allowed and the impugned proceedings are set aside in so far as the petitioner is concerned. No costs. 4. Sri Dammalapati Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs.10,34,634/- for regularization of his occupation and that he is entitled for refund of the said amount as the proceedings under the Act are set aside. 5. In view of the above, I deem it appropriate to permit the petitioner to make an application before respondent Nos.1 and 2 for refund of the said amount and the respondents shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon as early as possible preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the said application. 6. In view of allowing the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.27124 of 2010 is dismissed as unnecessary. _________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J 12th September, 2012. Js.