IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No.6258 of 2011 Date of Decision:14.10.2011 Shamsher Singh .... Petitioner Versus General Manager and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Thapar, Advocate for the respondents. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The prayer in the present petition is for releasing the superannuation benefits of the petitioner. Reply has been filed. As per the reply, the entire amount stands paid as per the entitlement of the petitioner except leave encashment for which there is no provision permitting encashment of leave of a workman being removed from service as disciplinary measure. The petitioner is stated to have received the said amount without any objection. In view of the said reply, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. However, in case the petitioner has still any claim, he is at liberty to move an appropriate representation to the appropriate authority within one month from the date of receipt of this order. In case, the petitioner files such representation, the same shall be decided within one month from the date of its receipt. 14.10.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE