1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 4858 OF 2010. Shrikant Dadarao Marode -: VERSUS :- The Hon’ble Collector and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 29, 2010. Shri S.K. Tambde, learned Counsel for petitioner, Learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1,4 and 6, Shri M.M. Bandebuche, learned Counsel for respondent no.3 and Shri A.V. Samarth, learned Counsel for respondent no.5. Question before this Court is whether the meeting conducted on 14.09.2010 is legal or then meeting conducted on 16.09.2010 is legal. Meeting conducted on 14.09.2010 is stated to be under Section 76 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The requisition dated 13.08.2010 on the strength of which that meeting has been alleged to be conducted is not produced 2 before this Court. Only direction issued by the Assistant Registrar on 04.09.2010 has been placed before this Court. As per Section 76[3] if the Special General Meeting is not called for as requisitioned, then only the Registrar or any person authorized by him get the power. The Collector, has called for recommendation of the competent authority i.e. the District Deputy Registrar of the Cooperative Department and upon perusal has relied upon the last meeting i.e. one dated 16.09.2010. The Collector, could not have examined the legality or otherwise of the holding of meeting and said contention of learned Counsel for petitioner require investigation into various facts. Such investigation cannot be undertaken even in present matter. Hence, leaving all contentions open for consideration before appropriate forum after the elections are held, present Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.