IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12944 of 2010 SANJAY PATEL @ Sanjay Singh Patel Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 05.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Husband of the informant died during his service period in Sugar Mill and allegation against the petitioner is about taking of Rs. 35000/- for payment of Sugar Mill as compensation amounting to Rs. 2,00,000/- but neither the money was returned nor compensation was given to the informant. Sugar Mill just after his death paid some amount but to different family members of the husband including mother-in-law, this petitioner and deceased’s brother. The matter is under investigation but material collected up till now does not justify refusal of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Mairwa P.S. Case No. 09 of 2010, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Siwan subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. However, at the stage of framing of the charge bail so granted to the petitioner shall be reconsidered by the Court below. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)