..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.119 OF 2007 Babu Bhima Dhotre ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. .... Ms.Rupali Deo-Sathe, Adv. for Applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 14th March, 2007. DATED : 14th March, 2007. DATED : 14th March, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.9 of 2006 registered at Haweli Police Station, Pune. The said case is under Sections 135 & 138 of the Electricity Act, 2003. It is the case of the prosecution that the applicant has committed theft of electricity in the amount of Rs.1,17,450/-. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicant has ..(2).. made a statement that the applicant will deposit half amount i.e. Rs.58,725/- before the trial Court. 4. The learned APP states that if the applicant is willing to deposit the said amount, there is no objection to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. 5. In the event of arrest, the applicant to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant shall deposit half amount i.e. Rs.58,725/- within two weeks from today before the trial Court. If the applicant fails to deposit the said amount within two weeks from today, this order shall automatically stand cancelled and it will be open to the Investigating Agency to arrest the applicant. 6. Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)