IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3452 of 2009 PROF. SUSHIL MOHAN PRASAD . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. . ----------- 05. 12.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Mr. Santi Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order has been complied with and the payments have been made. It is further submitted that since the payments have been made after a good delay, as such, petitioner is entitled to reasonable interest as well. In view of the above, since the order has been complied with, this contempt application need not proceed further and the same stands disposed of. However, it will be open for the petitioner to present his left out claim, if any, before the concerned authority. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)