IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28299 of 2010 UMA DUBEY, SON OF SRI LATE JAGDISH DUBEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 21.01.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Kutumba P.S. Case No. 18 of 2010 registered under Sections 392, 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, petitioner was caught by the informant and others while fleeing with snatched motorcycle. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case by the informant and, as a matter of fact, an accident took place on the alleged dated of occurrence for which informant and others badly assaulted the petitioner and thereafter, petitioner filed a complaint case bearing Complaint Case No. 264 of 2010 and thereafter, informant lodged this false case and simultaneously, the Police also lodged a separate case that is Tondawa P.S. Case No. 08 of 2010 for the offence of the Arms Act. He further submitted that petitioner has already been granted bail in the above stated Tondawa P.S. Case No. 08 of 2010. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor pointed out that petitioner carries criminal antecedent of similar nature of several cases, which has been admitted by the petitioner himself at Para 9 of his application. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as criminal antecedent of the petitioner I do not feel it proper to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected. The learned trial court should expedite the trial of the petitioner. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )