IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5960 of 2010 Date of Decision: October 01, 2010 Rai Sahab …Petitioner Versus Uday Singh … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate, for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 06.09.2010 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Fatehabad, whereby the evidence of the defendant was directed to be closed. C.R. No. 5960 of 2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner – defendant states that on the date as fixed by this Court or by the learned Trial Court, entire evidence shall be produced before the learned Trial Court by the defendant. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to it. Order dated 06.09.2010 is set aside. Learned Trial Court is directed to fix any date for the purpose of defendant’s evidence and on the date so fixed by the learned Trial Court, petitioner shall produce all the witnesses before the learned Trial Court. If, for any reason, examination is not complete on the date so fixed, then learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to hold day-to-day trial or fix any future date, which is convenient to the Court. Petition shall stand disposed of accordingly. October 01, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2