IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45778 of 2009 PRAMOD KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 28.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the informant and the State. Contradiction in the statement of the complainant that she was tortured for non- fulfilment of demand of dowry under section 498A IPC and ousted and in maintenance case due to her incapability of giving birth of child is replied by learned counsel for the complainant the fault of counsel. So the accusation leveled by the counsel cannot be made ground for refusal of anticipatory bail. In that view of the matter, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in 2 Complaint Case No. 110 C/2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)