1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.423 OF 2007 The State of Maharashtra ..Applicant V/s. Naresh Budhaji Patil & 44 ors .. Respondents Mrs.S.D.Shinde, A.P.P, for the State Mr.Prakash Naik, advocate, for the respondent Nos.1 to 24 and 28 to 45 CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & K.U.CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE : 30TH APRIL, 2008 P.C. . We have heard the learned counsel for the State Government, counsel for the complainant, who had filed Criminal Revision Application No.405 of 2006 and counsel for the respondents. After considering the Judgment and the evidence we are of the opinion that there was no material against the respondent Nos.2 to 15, 34, 37, 39, 43 and 44. Insofar as these accused/respondents are concerned, we decline to grant leave to appeal. 2 2. Insofar as other respondents are concerned, application is granted. Appeal is admitted. The respondents waive service. Insofar as the respondents against whom leave has been granted action U/s.390 has to be taken. The respondent Nos.1, 16 to 33, 35, 36, 38, 40, 41, 42 to appear before the learned Trial Court and to be relased on bail and on furnishing indemnity bond as directed by the trial Court. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)