IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 3578 OF 1990 Central Bank of India. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Dilipkumar Panalal Mehta and others. ... Defendants. None for the parties. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 14th December 2007. DATED: 14th December 2007. DATED: 14th December 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . None for the plaintiff. 2. By order dated 29th September, 2007, issues were framed by this Court and the plaintiff was directed to file affidavit of evidence along with documents. Time to file affidavit of evidence and documents has expired on 1st November, 2007. In spite of lapse of more than two and half months the order has not been complied with. Even today nobody is present on behalf of plaintiff- Bank. 3. Under these circumstances, suit is dismissed for want of evidence with costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)