IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH AUGUST 2010 / 13TH SRAVANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 4624 of 2010() ------------------------------------------ (CMP.NO.407/2010 IN SC 885/2006 OF ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT) (CR.NO.47/CR/06 OF CBCID, KOZHIKODE) PETITIONER/3RD ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------ ANILAN, S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN, PATHAPARAMBIL HOUSE, MUPLIYAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT/STATE: -------------------------------------------------------------- STATE REP. BY CBCID, KOZHIKODE. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = B.A.No.4624 of 2010 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated, this the 4th day of August, 2010 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 3rd accused in S.C.No.885/2006 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vadakara for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 341, 364, 394, 307, 302 and 426 read with 149 and 120(b) IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 11.2.2006. The petitioner was arrested on 16.10.2008. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the legal injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) dmb