WP(C) 1603/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. P.D. Nair, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Patha k, learned standing counsel for BSNL authorities. The petitioner, who was appointed as a Franchisee by the BSNL for its products a nd services for the area Nagaon-7 under Telecom District, Nagaon, has filed th e instant petition with the allegation that the commission due to the petitioner has not been paid by the BSNL authorities. It is submitted by Mr. Nair that earlier when the continuation of the Franchisee was threatened the petitioner had filed a writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 2444/ 08 and on the strength of an interim order passed on 11.8.08 on the said petitio n, the BSNL authority’s order dated 29.7.08 has been stayed and the petitioner i s continuing as a Franchisee. Mr. Pathak, learned standing counsel, on the other hand, submits that in pursuan t to the said interim order, the petitioner has been permitted to continue as a Franchisee and he has received information that the commission payable to the pe titioner as a Franchisee is also being processed for payment. The learned counsel submits that on verification the dues to the petitioner woul d be paid within a reasonable time. In view of above, Mr. Nair submits that if payments due towards commission as a Franchisee is paid, within a reasonable time, he will have no justification to press this writ petition. Accordingly, this petition is ordered to be closed with the direction to the BSN L authorities to make the payment of commission due to the petitioner without un necessary delay, after completing the required formalities.