THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.11073 OF 2000 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent in considering the application of the petitioner made under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short “the Act”) for re-determination of the amount of compensation on the basis of the Award dated 26.4.1997 in O.P.No.346 of 1988 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, in respect of the land covered by the notification dated 4.10.1985 issued under Section 4(1) of the Act. Though Rule nisi was ordered on 27.6.2000, no counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent so far. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and in the absence of any counter affidavit, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner dated 14.5.1997 in accordance with law. In case it is found that the application made by the petitioner is found to be in order and within the time prescribed under Section 28A of the Act, the respondents shall re-determine the compensation following due process of law. No costs. __________ (G. ROHINI). 1st May, 2007. Kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.11073 OF 2000 1st May, 2007. Between: Anisetty Venkata Reddy. .. Petitioner. And The Revenue Divisional Officer-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District. .. Respondent.