IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51359 of 2008 ANMOL YUDAV @ ANMOL KUMAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 26.3.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. In the opinion of this Court, the allegation which has now been crystallized in course of investigation, would reveal that even though Suraj Yadav @ Birendra Yadav was the main kingpin but then the complicity of the petitioner was also there as would be apparent from the fact that it was the statement of the petitioner on which not only the motorcycle was recovered but also Suraj Yadav was nabbed. That being so, when the petitioner is in custody in connection with an offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code only for last six months i.e. with effect from 12.9.2008, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after completing one year of judicial custody. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)