IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35108 of 2007 1. RAM PRAVESH SINGH son of Sahdeo Singh 2. Sahdeo Singh son of Lali Ram Surat Singh 3. Suraj Nath Singh son of late Ram Surat Singh 4. Baban Singh son of late Ram Surat Singh 5. Dadan Singh son of Late Ram Surat Singh 6. Rama Nand Singh son of Suraj Nath Singh 7. Sunil Singh son of Suraj Nath Singh All resident of village- Rampur, P. S. Sonhan, Distt. Kaimur. … Petitioners Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Ram Kishore Singh son of Late Baijnath Singh, of village Sakri, P. S. KUDRA, DISTT. KAIMUR. .. OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 8. 03.09.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel for opposite party no. 2. The order taking cognizance has been assailed by the learned counsel for the petitioners on many grounds and while much can be said about the allegation made in the complaint petition against the petitioners, but then it remains a fact that when at one point of time two families had agreed to get their relationship established by marrying two eligible spouses, the failure of solemnization such marriage would definitely leave both the parties with hard feelings for each other. In this case also, the scenario somewhat is the same. While both the sides are before this Court in the present case, counsel 2 for opposite party no. 2 would inform that another prosecution at the instance of the petitioners being complaint case no. 631 of 2005 is pending before a competent court in the district of Kaimur. Counsels for both the parties have submitted that both the parties however ultimately now intend to resolve their all differences and disputes. This Court therefore would direct that petitioners should first withdraw the aforementioned complaint case no. 631 of 2005 whereafter the complaint case no. 550 of 2005 against them (which has given rise to this case) shall also stand withdrawn on a written apology given by Sahdeo Singh to the complainant of this case namely Ram Kishore Singh and a token amount of Rs.5000/- to be paid to the complainant by the petitioners. If the petitioner no. 2 would give a written apology to opposite party no. 2 and also a sum of Rs.5000/- within a period of four months from today, the court below will pass an appropriate order for dropping the proceedings of both the complaint cases. For a period of four months, further 3 proceedings in both the Complaint Case Nos. 631 of 2005 and 550 of 2005 shall remain stayed. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this application is finally disposed of. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)