IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ( MCC. NO/J??3 /20Q5 ApplicanV Petitioner Non-Applicant/ Respondent "1 M.S.Pathak & others Versus -...^ 'i^ CoallndiaLtd&Others APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION UNDERORDER 9 RULE 9 READ WITH SEC.1510FTHEC.P.C -T XI-HC-22 •^ai •^TPTRPI, slTfl'y'l'a, 1««r!lt!l( WR-fT VhW* .c-.c .r°o- 2-' an^i^r Ki-ii'* an^r sh^ic:b ^^ raju $6/01/20(^ 311^1'TOHWflft^ shotvn Shri R. MiikUopadhyay, Coun^el for the appUcants. Heard. Suf&cient cause has been ](>rayed for restoriag to its original 4ost ofRs.150/- (Rupees One hun4 (pourt Legal Aid Coniinittee. In fhe circuiustances, I.A.No.1 ^tands disposed of. eftTil^41l 'WT^f "^ 'ft1^ ^^T^:I< ^siPgiian^i L. Application is ordered as aiunber subject to payinent of red 'fifly) payable to the High 46/2006 for iirgent hearing Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1