IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No : 17836 of 2005 Between: T.Ch.Veeroji, S/o.T.Rayappa, (Telecom) BSNL, Vijayawada-520 001. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chief general Manager (Telecom), A.P.Circle, Station Road, Nampally, Hyderabad-500 001. 2 The General Manager, Telecom District, (BSNL) Vijayawada, 500 004. 3 The Sr.Superintendent of Telecom Traffic, O/o.G.M.T.D, BSNL., Vijayawada. 4 The Sub-Divisional Engineer Incharge, Central Telegraph Office, BSNL, Vijayawada-520 001. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction or a writ more particularly a writ of mandamus, directing the Respondents to promote the petitioner to the cadre of BCR with effect from 01-07- 2001, with all the consequential benefits , duly setting aside the impugned order No.SSTT/S.17/Prom/02-06, dt.27-07-2005 communicating the decision of the 2nd Respondent rejecting the request of the petitioner for promotion under BCR scheme with effect from 01-07-2001 on the due date, declaring the same as arbitrary, illegal, unwarranted, misconceived and in violation of articles 14 & 16 of Constitution of India, and be pleased to pass such other and further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SANKA RAMAKRISHANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.(SC FOR B.S.N.L) The Court made the following O R D E R : A letter dated 9th July 2009 has been circulated by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner to the registry seeking to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ---------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 10th July 2009 ksld ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRR}