1 wp6046-02 ttm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6046 OF 2002 Balaleshwar Shikshan Mandal and Anr. .. Petitioners Vs. Shri Jayvant Bhaguji Gadekar and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Uday Warunjikar for the petitioners Ms.Kumud A. Bhatia for respondent no.1 Mr.S.G.Bhosale, A.G.P. for respondent no.2. CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE: 11th MARCH, 2011 P.C. 1. The learned counsel for respondent no.1 states that on 20.4.10 counsel for the petitioner made a statement that inspite of repeated communication, the petitioners have not responded to the same and therefore, unable to proceed further with the matter, for want of instructions. At that time, on the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, matter was adjourned beyond Summer Vacation for taking steps. Again the matter appeared on 25.2.11 before this court (Coram:Smt.Nishita Mhatre, J) and at 2 wp6046-02 that time, the court granted two weeks time as last chance to take appropriate instructions. It is specifically stated in the order dt.25.2.11 that in case the learned advocate does not get instructions by then, the “ petition will be dismissed for non-prosecution .” 2. Today, the learned counsel for the petitioners state that they have not received any instructions. Considering these facts, matter stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (K.K. TATED, J.)