THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.11390 OF 2010 DATED:10.06.2010 Between: Boddu Ratnamba .. Petitioner And The Director of Town and Country Planning, 640. AC Guards, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.11390 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is resident of Kothapet Village, Vetapalem Mandal, Prakasam District. She purchased the land admeasuring 458 square yards in Survey No.183/1A of Kothapet Gram Panchayat (I.L.T.D. Colony Extension Area) bearing Plot No.371, under a registered sale deed dated 29.05.2006. Third respondent is the owner of Plot Nos.368 and 369 statedly situated under northern side of petitioner’s Plot No.371. The petitioner alleges that respondent Nos.3 and 4 (respondent No.4 appears to be the contractor) are making constructions deviating from the sanctioned plan and that appropriate setbacks are not left. It is further alleged by the petitioner that the apartment being constructed by respondent Nos.3 and 4 is contrary to the approved plan and foundation pillars are allegedly extending on the northern side into her site. Therefore, the petitioner got issued a notice on 15.04.2010 through her lawyer. The same was not responded to. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the instant writ petition seeking a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to initiate necessary action. Insofar as alleged encroachment by respondent Nos.3 and 4 into the petitioner’s Plot No.371 is concerned, it is a civil dispute and the petitioner has to seek redressal in a Common Law Court. Insofar as the alleged contravention of sanctioned plan by not leaving the required setback is concerned, respondent No.2 may conduct an enquiry, after issuing notice to the petitioner and respondent Nos.3 and 4. If there are any deviations of the sanctioned plan, necessary action may be taken by the Gram Panchayat of Kothapet. The Writ Petition, with the above observation, is disposed of. ______________ (V.V.S. RAO, J) 10.06.2010 KH