IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 7746 of 1995 Between: 1.Parupalli Musalayya, S/o Bapayya, aged about 60 years, 2.Ruttala Yerramma, W/o Sanyasi, aged 52 years, cultivation, 3.Parupalli Appanna, S/o Appanna, aged 46 years, 4.Parupalli Atchayya, s/o Late Bapayya, aged 58 years, 5.Purupalli Ramulu, S/o Mutyalu, aged 50 years, 6.Parupalli Simhachalam, W/o late Mutyalu, aged 68 years, 7.Parupalli Akkamma, D/o Ralulu, aged 30 years, 8.Parupalli Yerrayya, s/o Yerrayya, aged 50 years, 9.Parupalli Yerrayya, S/o Appanna, aged 48 years, 10.Katchalla Appanna, S/o Kittayya, aged 54 years, 11.Kuncha Nookanna, S/o. Appanna, aged 60 years, 12.Katchalla Peda Demudu, S/o. Pothu Raju, aged 55 years, 13.Gorle Ganganna, S/o Pentayya, aged 52 years, 14.Gorle Appanna, s/o. Pothu Raju, aged 54 years, 15.Gorle Demudu, S/o Paradesi, aged 60 years, 16.Katchalla Swami Naidu, S/o Rama Swamy, aged 60 years, 17.Yeka Appanna, s/o Appanna, aged 45 years, 18.Katchalla Chellayyamma, W/o Ramulu, aged 58 years, 19.Ruttala Demudu, S/o. Kannayya, aged 45 years, 20.Saka Pothu Raju, S/o. Bhogisetti, aged 54 years, 21.Parupalli Kondadu, S/o.Mutyalu, aged 45 years, 22.Parupalli Mutyalu, S/o Dalayya, aged 54 years, 23.Katchalla Nooka Raju, s/o Pothu Raju, aged 48 years, All are cultivators and residents of Z.Gangavaram village,Makavarapalem Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1.The District Collector, Visakhapatnam. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narsipatnam, Visakhapatnam Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein to refer the matter to the civil court U/s 18 of the Land Acquisition Act for enhancement of the compensation in respect of the lands of the petitioners in BLOCK No. III of Z. Gangavaram (V), Makavarapalem (M), Visakhapatnam Dist forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.SRI RAGHU RAM Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1&2: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.7746 of 1995 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. _______________ N.V.RAMANA, J Dated: 6th August, 2004. CS/SVV ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narsipatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 3. Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (O.U.T.) 4. Two C.D. copies.