IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 5321 of 2004 Ravi Pandurang Mhatre ..Petitioner vs. 1. Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation and ors. ..Respondents Mr.R.D.Suryavanshi for petitioner Mr.R.S.Apte with Mr.A.A.Garg for respondent nos. 1 to 3 Mr.M.B.Shirsat with Mr.P.D.Jadhav for respondent no.4. CORAM: A.P.SHAH CORAM: A.P.SHAH CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.U.KAMDAR JJ. S.U.KAMDAR JJ. S.U.KAMDAR JJ. 18th August,2004 18th August,2004 18th August,2004 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Perused the original tender form. One of the conditions of the tender was that the applicant should have average annual turn over of Rs.10,00,000/- during the last 3 yearss. The relevant condition being condition no.3(b) reads as follows: -------------------------------------------------- 3. Eligibility criteria and documents required to establish eligibility. Criteria Required Documents required eligibility to establish eligibility. a) .... b) Turn over Average annual Audited Financial turnover of Statement for Rs.10.00 lacs previous (Y-1)year during the last Audited Financial three years. Statement for(Y-2) year. Audited Financial Statement for(Y-3) year. 3. Admittedly the petitioner has not carried any business in 2001-2002 and 2002-2003. Therefore, he does not comply with the condition of having turn over of Rs.10,00,000/- during the last 3 years. The petitioner’s tender was thus rightly rejected by the Competent Authority. 4. Petition is accordingly dismissed. 5. Tender papers be returned to the Counsel appearing for the Corporation.