IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.Rev. (T) No. 63 of 2008 Decided on: 29.10.2010 Dinu Ram …Petitioner. Versus Dr. Y.S. Parmar University …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondent : None. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The learned erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal vide judgment dated 17.09.2003 has dismissed the Original Application No. 785 of 2001 by holding that the services of the petitioner cannot be regularized as Electrician for want of technical qualification. However, it is settled law by now that the qualification is to be seen at the time of initial appointment and not at the time of regularization. 2. Consequently, the judgment dated 17.09.2003 passed by learned erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal is 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? no -2- recalled. Now OA No. 785 of 2001 be listed for hearing next week. 2. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of . No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 29, 2010 (K. Attri)