1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO. 1349 of 2005 Kashinath s/o Dhanaji Kuklare & others .. APPELLANTS VERSUS Thakubai w/o Bandu Kuklare & others .. RESPONDENTS Shri V.I. Thole, Advocate for the appellants. Smt. S.S. Autade, AGP for respondent no. 3. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 7 th August, 2009. PER COURT : 1 The parties have arrived at compromise. Draft compromise has been duly verified by the Registrar(Judl) on 9-7-2009. This court by an order dt. 9-7-2009 was pleased to adjourn the matter for the purpose of securing say of the State Government in relation to compromise. The Land Acquisition Officer is made party to the proceeding only because certain land involved in the litigation is acquired by the State and the amount of compensation is lying with the Land Acquisition Officer. The Land Acquisition Officer – respondent no. 3 herein would be liable to disburse the amount of compensation in accordance with the terms of the compromise / understanding reached between the parties. Smt. Autade, learned AGP 2 appearing for the Land Acquisition Officer on instructions states that she has no objection for recording compromise. In this view of the matter, compromise terms are taken on record. The terms of compromise were already explained to the parties concerned in Marathi language. Learned counsel for the respective parties have signed the compromise. Judgment and decree passed by the trial court is required to be set aside and in its place decree in terms of the compromise will have to be substituted. Appeal stands allowed. Decree in terms of compromise be recorded. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/fa1349.05.odt