IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11249 of 2010 Ram Chandra @ Sunil Yadav, son of Late Beni Yadav, resident of village – Kumardih, P.S. Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad Versus STATE OF BIHAR 2 29-4-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, leaned counsel for the informant and learned counsel for the State. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that although the case was subsequently converted u/s 302 of the IPC but police found the involvement of the petitioner false and submitted final report but now he has been summoned to face trial u/s 319 of the Cr. P. C. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that the deceased had named this petitioner in the FIR as the person who had caught him while another shot at him and later this petitioner fired but the shot missed and hit a wall. It has further been submitted that four witnesses have supported the involvement of the petitioner and, therefore, he has been summoned. Although there is no allegation that any injury to the deceased was caused by this petitioner but considering the nature of offence and name of the petitioner being mentioned by the deceased in the FIR, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of petitioner if he surrenders and seeks regular bail on all the grounds available to him including the ground that he has not caused any injury to the deceased. BKS/ (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)