(?' S82._9 j2i ^•IW ^w ^^ ^y/ w^y ^y^ Sinsle^men •«L'.1-' 4 DICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT Manish Kumar Sharma, 5/oShriG.D.Sharma Aged afout 35 years, City Superintendent of RolJGe, Kotwali BiJaspur, Distt.Biiaspur (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Homs Department (Poiice), D.K-S Bhawan. Raipur, Dist ilpur-(C.G.) The Director General of Pofice, Polics Headquarter, Raipur, Districtt- Raipuf-(C.G.) State of Madhya Pradesh, Through the SeGretai'y,; Home Department (R'oiice), Vallahh Bhawan, BBo 'he Dlrector Generaltof Polica, Poiice Headquarterl 5tlRnic,y!' (CQ). C p^; P^! The Secretary, GeneralAdministratJQR 1 Govt. of Madhya Rrac)0 State Reorganizatipn^ Vallabh Bha'iran; Bhop; Unionoflndia Through the Secretary, j Govt.iCfflndia ii Ministey of Pensonnelil&j PubliciGnevances, | NewDeihi .. ShriS ddharth (3how8B^Fti apyr(MP?.i asi 'XM lij J- (2) tTPETmONUNDERART-iCLE226/2^^FTHE CtMJSTirUTJQN ^^^nqTcCT/S^lwre.f^HCTg^ *ll*t«lWV^ ""•"••••"•~:-••"— .^—..... 3ii^?iira^(>^fg^) <<< 70 ai^rwf^riq; a'airsn^ffBqi^ !.-tf- .i.i W^200^ ?^aTm^ift!T3ii^T <bWFri41'l*ll*<dt'^"l^i^l'<Rl'(^l-< ^3lf^T3D^?I " 16.11.2005 Shri P. Diwakar, Sen|ior Advocate with Shri Kunal Das, counsel for the petitioner. Shri P.S. Koshy, respondents No. 1 to 5/ St^ eputy Advocate General for fhe Ee. Shri S.K. Beriwal,| Senior Panel lawyer for the respondent No. 6/Uniou of]India. Shri Awadh Tripathi,) counsel for the respondent No.7. Shri P. Diwakar, leajned SeniorAdvocate appeanng for fhe petitioner submits fha^ of the petitiouer aad the ^ adiuittedly, the order of aUocation espondent No. 7, dated 24.6.2005 has been passed on tt|e basis of the inutual consent However, fhe order stat^s that the rautual allocatioit is provisional. Leamed counsel ap^earing for fhe State Goverrunent of Madhya Pradesh and the the order of allocation da| petitioner and the respo State of Chhattisgarh submits that fced 24.6.2005 is final so far as ftie dent No. 7 are concemed and if R'Ii3S/2005-2Q,pOO iJlAL^^^.. '3-"i»<fiqirt<f;y-^l<{-|<|^;^|cAt<H;^( •"<»**'•' 71 TFI^T^RT^ ,i^..^.:.Vo:___:3&'2-g W-^200^ 3II^?I<PlR;IIW asiTsn^^Twwp 3rr^r(raqt(^fgci^) B^n'w^rf8cigii^?T "2- ia@yw -•'-^^ ^' ^'- ^^ <titaf<'><!)i<ii»iwV^"fel^<|SKtfH ^3ri^q3II^?T R ^' ° necessary, an approprialje order would be passed by the Union oflndia. In view of fhe abo+e stated facts fhat Union of India should not have any appropriate order be pass; In view ofthe foregc Certified copy, as pj objection, and as such fhat an ;d t>y fhe Union of India. iag, fhe petition stands disposed of. r Rules. Sd/- satish K. Asnihotri Judge