IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN Present: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY A.S.No.2386 OF 1999 Between: Madasu Ambakka (died) per LR Madasu Nagalakshmamma. … Appellant And: The Revenue Divisional officer, Kurnool, Kurnool District. … Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY A.S. No.2386 OF 1999 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy) This appeal, under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is preferred by the claimant against the common order dated 11-11-1998 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Atmakur in L.A.O.P.No.7 of 1989 and batch, seeking further enhancement of compensation. 2. The learned Senior Civil Judge by the impugned order dated 11-11-1998 disposed of L.A.O.P.Nos.12, 6, 8 to 11, 13 to 18 and 20 to 24 of 1989 fixing the market value of the acquired land at Rs.15,000/- per acre. On claimants filing further appeals in A.S.Nos.2380, 2375, 2379, 2389, 2393, 2390, 2387, 2371, 2372, 2310, 2433, 2244 and 2204 of 1999 and A.S.No.2040 of 2004, this Court allowed the appeals in part fixing the market value of the acquired lands at Rs.70,000/-. 3. The learned Government Pleader for Appeals fairly conceded about the enhancement made by this Court in the above batch of appeals. 4. Following the same and for the reasons mentioned therein, this appeal is also partly allowed, fixing the market value of the acquired land at Rs.70,000/- per acre. It is needless to mention that the claimant is entitled to all the statutory benefits under the amended provisions of the Land Acquisition Act including interest on solatium and additional market value as per the law declared by the Supreme Court in a judgment reported in Sunder Vs. Union of India [1]. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J. ____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J. Dated 30th March, 2010 Lrkm [1] AIR 2001 SC 3516