IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH ^- WRIT|rPETITION N0.....?; Z^t... OF 2004 S.R. Singh S/o. Late Shri P.N. Singh, Aged about 57 ye^lrs Senior Research Assistant, Urban Planning and Development, / R.D.A., Bhawan, Shastri Chowk, Raipur Chhattisgarh. VERSUS PETITIONER •^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Environment and Urban Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) &' State of Chhattisgarh. B. Through Director, Urban Planning and Development, R.D.A. Bhawan, Shastri Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Sri Prakash Chand Raikwar (P.C. Raikwar) .-y ^ ..-'^v' ^c>*,-<^ y ^g^ />,<^.-y ^ ^&"/ •^••<y" S/o. Late Sri Dayaram Raikwar, Aged about 53 years, Assistant Director, Urban Planning and Development Regional Office Jagdalpur (Bastar) RESPONDENT PETITION UNDER AR^ICLE 226/22^ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ORDER/DIRECTION^AND WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 874 of 2004 Petitioner S. R. Singh Versus Resix>ndents State of Chhattisgarh & others 8B: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agaihotri, J 's^^ p Shri V. K. Pandey, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri V. V. S. Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General for fhe respondents ^o3. Shri Maaiadra Shrivastava, Senior Advocate with SDit. Sxaita Ghai, Advocate for fhe rcspondent No. 4. ORAL ORDER ( 13th June, 2006) The foUowmg order of fhe Court was passed by Satish K. Agaihofcri, J. Leamed cozinsel appeariiig for fhe petitioner, on iiistructfon, subinits fhat the petitioner has fUed aa Original Application before fhe Madhya Pradesh Adininistrative Tribunal Bench at Raipur, beiag O, A. No. 626/1999, for the same reMef, as prayed for m fhis petition, The petitioner waats to withdraw fhis petition wifh Uberty to pursue the Origiual AppUcation which has been traiisferred to fhis Court on dissolution of fhe State Administrative Tribunal. Leanied counsel appearing for fhe ofher side have no objection. The petition is accordmgly dismissed as wifhdrawn. The Registiy is dirccted to list fhe O.A.No. 626/1999 for hearing after its rcgistration as writ petition. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur