esr t' ^ ?? i-«- UUtitf IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. fS) No. <3<3-^ /2007 Petitioner .«;• ^' ^w ^-<^"./ ns^/ ^SA-" ••.ly .:'*>" Versus -^Birendra Kumar Chandravanshi S/o Shri Sudarshan Singh Chandravanshi Aged about 40 years, Asst. Teacher, Prathmik Shala Bhanpur, Post - Marka, Block - Kawardha, Distt : Kabirdham ;.G.) Respondents t" <; ^ >*' -i '•". -•''', ;;^u' ?\^ State of Chhattisgarh Through - Seereteuy School Education Department, Mantralaya D.K.S. Raipur (C.G.) District Education Kawardha, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER SECTION 226 OF_THE CONSTITUTIOU OF INDIA t /"?: XI-HC-78 's^ •^ww^, fi-i^wie., Ritni'My W.p. C&J 1^<S. S05-/07 *11*1WI Sn^ivn ^200 3ll^l '4a«h(1^3^?) sn^T^rRFira; (IW 311^1 ailletl Subhash ^dTW (TfScT 3TI^T 22.01.2007 Mr. Deepak Jain, counsel Ms. Sunitn Jcin, Panel Lawfye for^ the petitioner(s5. for the State/respondents. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is heard Common order dictoted in open Court, passed separately. A copy of this order" be connected writ petitions. fearded counsel appesring for- the flinally and disposed of. ^frit Petition (55 No. 304/2007 in Wfrit +iiil<'i<fl-< 4itii-iT^teci)'<Ri+i;i< ^srf^iTsn^T ploced on the record of the Sd/- SatishK.Agnitiotri Judge P.T.O. HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISSARH AT BILASPW SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. 5ATLSH K. ASNIHOTRI. J. WRFT PETmON (5.) No. 304 OF 2007 Petitioner ; Madantal Chandrokar versus State of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETTTION (S.) No. 305 OF 2007 Petitioner ; Birendra Kumar Chandravanshi yerais State of Chhatfisgarh and another Present : Mr. Deepak Jain, counsei for the petitioner(s). Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. •s^ ORDER yassed on 1+iis 22nd t>ay of January, 2007) Learned counse! appearing for tiie petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointty submit that the facts and question of taw involved in the present writ petitjons are squarely covered by •ftie decision of this Court in the case of yashvmntfXiWar Bhar-adwaj vs. Municipat Corporation, Owy and anothei^. 2. For •ttie aforementioned reasons, these writ pe+itions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of YashHwnt ^imar- Shwadwaj (5upra), subject to yenfication of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T-I. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and fur-f+ier whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on 1+ie record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006 (H) MPJR-C6 96 Subhash 1