14/10/2011 Shri Deepak Khot, Advocate for the applicants. Shri R.P. Rathi, Panel Lawyer for the respondent- State. Heard on I.A.No.10770/2011, which is an application for urgent hearing. Considering the reasons assigned in the application, application (I. A. No. 10770/2011) is allowed. Matter is taken up today for hearing. Perused the case diary. Also heard on this first application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of applicants for grant of anticipatory bail, who are apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No.127 of 2011 registered for the offences punishable under Section 498-A of IPC and under section 3 / 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. As per prosecution case, applicant No. 1 and 2 are brother-in-law of complainant and applicant No.3 is sister-in- law of complainant. Applicants and co-accused subjected complainant to cruelty with respect to demand of dowry. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants resided separately from the year 2009 and not with complainant and her husband. It is further submitted that applicant no.3 is a student. It is further submitted that they are ready to cooperate investigation. No chances of their absconding. On these grounds, prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. Learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/ State opposed the application and prayed for its rejection. Considering overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, application is allowed and it is directed that in case of arrest applicants be released on bail, on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.45,000/-(Rupees forty five Thousand only) each with one solvent surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the I.O./Arresting Officer with a condition that they shall cooperate with the investigation and shall remain present whenever called by I.O. during investigation. The applicants shall abide by all the conditions as enumerated under Section 438(2) of Cr. P. C. The Trial Court is directed to follow the guidelines laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others AIR 2011 SC 312. A copy of this order be sent to the PS and the Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. CC as per rules. (Indrani Datta) van J u d g e