CRLMB7097/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.7097/2010 Saikul Vs. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor Date of Order ::: 05.08.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Harendra Singh, Counsel for petitioner Shri Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor Shri Azad Ahmed, Counsel for complainant #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as the learned counsel for complainant and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that allegation of causing gunshot injury on the person of deceased Mobin is attributed to Khurshid; there are two other injured, namely, Khurshidan and Smt. Amrudi, while the injury sustained by Khurshidan is gunshot injury on her leg, has been assigned to co-accused Anees. There are three more injuries sustained by injured and all are simple in nature and the petitioner has been named as one of the assailant responsible for such injury on omnibus allegation against co-accused; there is no previous case registered against the petitioner; challan has already been filed; trial will take a long. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I deem it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner, CRLMB7097/2010 // 2 // namely, Saikul Son of Sufeda on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in FIR No.21/2010, Police Station Pahadi, District Bharatpur, for offence under Sections 307 and 302 IPC, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sureties of Rs.15000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The bail application stands disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//