IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18206 of 2010 JANAK BIHARI RAM, SON OF LATE UJAIN RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-EKWANA, P.S. –BARHARA, DISTRICT-BHOJPUR AT ARA. …..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. R.K. Singh (Adv.) For the State : APP. ----------- 02/ 30.06.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected earlier considering the allegation that he was involved in a case under Section 8 (C)/20(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. From the impugned order dated 19.02.2010, it appears that a report of Forensic Science Laboratory after examination has not been received. Considering the quantum of recovery prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected earlier. There is no change in the circumstances. Considering the facts and 2 circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the above named petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is again rejected. However, if the report of the Forensic Science Laboratory is received that the seized article was not Ganja then the petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)