1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4787 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4787 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4787 OF 2003 Shabbir Ahmed Mustaq Ahmed Shaikh ..Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents. ----- WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4833 OF 2003 Anilkumar Narayandas Shah ..Applicant. v/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents. ----- Shri Balasaheb Bandal i/by Uday Warunjikar & Subhash P.Hulyalkar for the Applicant in both the Applications. Shri A.M. Chimalekar, PP for the CBI. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. DATED : JANUARY 17, 2005 DATED : JANUARY 17, 2005 DATED : JANUARY 17, 2005 PC :- PC :- PC :- . Counsel for the CBI has handed over communications sent by the Applicants - Shabbir Ahmed Mustaq Ahmed Shaikh and Anil Kumar Narayan Das Shah, which have been submitted through Superintendent of Yerwada Central Prison, Pune dated 20th August, 2004 respectively. On the previous date counsel for the applicants sought adjournment to ascertain the position, whether the applicants were really wanting 2 to withdraw subject applications. Today when the matter is called out, counsel for the Applicants submits that he has no instructions in the matter. There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the position stated by the counsel for the CBI. In the circumstances, both the applications are dismissed for non prosecution. . Ordered accordingly. .....