WP(C) 5723/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE. B.D. AGARWAL With the consent of the learned counsel for both the sides, the writ petition is being disposed of at the order stage itself. The writ petitioner herein is the tenant of respondent No.3 name ly, Sri Jugal Kishore Sureka. The petitioner is challenging the order dated 16.8 .2010 passed by the appellate authority under the Assam Town and Country Plannin g Act, 1959 dismissing the appeal of the writ petitioner challenging the permiss ion granted to the respondent No.3 by the Tinsukia Development Authority. Heard Mr. GN Sahewalla, learned counsel for the petitioner Also heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the respondent No.3 and Mr. AK Gupta, le arned counsel for the Tinsukia Development Authority. Mr. Sahewalla submitted that while obtaining the approval of the plan, the respondent No.3 suppressed the fact of existence of Assam type house with four numbers of shops in the front side. This fact has been reflected by the appellate authority in the impugned order. Apparently, the appellate authority has also observed in its ord er dated 16.8.2010 that the Tinsukia Development Authority may consider the revi sed plan if submitted by Sri Jugal Kishore Sureka, respondent No.3. To-day Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel appearing for the responden t No.3 agreed that he may be allowed to submit a revised plan to the Tinsukia De velopment Authority which shall be considered and passed in accordance with the Rules. Mr. Sahewalla had no objection to this proposal. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with the liber ty to Sri Jugal Kishore Sureka to submit a revised plan to Tinsukia Development Authority which shall be considered in accordance with the Rules. Till any such plan is approved by the Tinsukia Development Autho rity, the respondent No.3 shall not make any further construction. Since there i s restraint order, the Tinsukia Development Authority shall examine the revised site as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of submission of the same. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.