IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33788 of 2010 JAITU SAH @ CHAITU SAH SON OF SRI NITHALI SAO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 2.2.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 323, 307 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 9.8.2010 vide Cr.Misc.No.16517 of 2010 but with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. Considering that the charges have been framed and there are altogether three cases pending against the petitioner, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Fast Track Court No.4th, Jehanabad in S.Tr.No.149 of 2010/ 96 of 2010 arising out of Karpi P.S. case No.148 of 2003, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be Ram Sahay Kumar (maternal brother of the petitioner) and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the 2 petitioner, (ii) (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash,J.)