HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21567 of 2010 Date : 30.08.2010 Between : Kolliparla Srilakshmi. …..Petitioner And The District Collector, Prakasam District & others. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21567 of 2010 ORDER : In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks directions to respondent No.1, for disposal of the revision filed by her under the provisions of the A.P. Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2008, framed under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The petitioner is a fair price shop dealer for shop Nos.7 and 8 of Darsi Town and Mandal of Prakasam District. On the ground that she has violated the provisions under the Control Order and also the conditions of authorization, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against her. The primary authority i.e. the 3rd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur, by an order, dated 4th February 2010, passed in Proceedings No.R.C.F/522/09, cancelled the petitioner’s authorization on the ground that the petitioner has misappropriated certain stocks, and further, ordered for recovery of an amount of Rs.1,75,143.75 ps., from the petitioner. As against the same, the petitioner has preferred an appeal before the appellate authority, which was also dismissed by an order, dated 17.06.2010, issued in Rc.CS2/813/2010. It is further stated that as against the said orders of appellate authority, the petitioner carried the matter in revision before the District Collector on 22nd of July 2010, along with an application for interim stay, but no orders are being passed on the same. In this writ petition, it is the grievance of the petitioner that as she has already distributed the stocks, there is no reason to order for recovery of any amount from her, particularly, with penalty of three times. It is submitted that in any event, as a revision is preferred before the revisional authority and the same is pending, there is no reason for the respondents in taking steps for recovery of the penalty amount, even before passing of orders by the revisional authority. Asmuch as the revision is pending before the revisional authority, it is not desirable for this Court to record any findings on the plea of the petitioner. As it is stated that the petitioner has already filed revision before the revisional authority on 22.07.2010, and the same is pending consideration, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the revisional authority to dispose of the revision filed by the petitioner within a period of two months from today. There shall be a further direction to the respondents not to recover any amount from the petitioner, till such revision is disposed of by the revisional authority. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 30th August 2010 ajr