IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-31492 of 2009 Date of decision:16.11.2009. Pardeep Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.B.S.Teji, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Rishu Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioner and respondent No.2 have compounded the offences and have placed on record documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P-2. Petitioner and respondent No.2 are present in the Court and are identified by their respective counsel. They own up the compounding. They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statement is also recorded separately. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.167 dated 26.08.2009, under Sections 279/337/338 IPC, P.S. Model Town, District Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. November 16, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE