IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.655 of 2008 1. AWADHESH SHARMA @ BILOO SINGH 2. NAND DEO SINGH @ NANDEO SHARMA 3. ANANT SINGH 4. SURESH SHARMA @ GARIBAN SINGH 5. SIYA RAM YADAV 6. SURESH YADAV. …PEITTIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAMJEE PRASAD SINGH. OPPOISITE PARTIES ----------- 04. 29.09.2010 Heard counsel for the parties. 2nd party to the proceeding under section 145 Cr.P.C. are the petitioners. They are aggrieved by the order dated 20.01.2008, passed by learned SDJM, Masaurhi (Patna) in Case No.557 of 1997, whereby learned Magistrate declared the possession of the 1st party(o.p.no.2 herein) over part of the disputed land. It further appears that on the rest possession of the 2nd party (petitioners herein) was declared. Learned counsel for the petitioners while assailing the order, submits that by reasons of the order, learned Magistrate has decided the title of the parties vis-à-vis the disputed land(s). After having considered the submissions, this Court disposes of this application with the observation that any finding(s) with regard to title over the disputed land(s) under the impugned order shall not prejudice their claim of title in any manner, if raised before the court of competent jurisdiction. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )