IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1126 of 2008 SOHAIL AHMAD KHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6/ 31/08/2009 Heard the petitioner in person, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the alleged victim of the episode of abduction claimed by the petitioner, when the alleged victim is none other than his own wife. An unsavory controversy appears to have been created. From the allegations in the F.I.R. itself it is apparent that it is the own case of the petitioner that his married wife had gone away with another along with her two children born out of the wedlock. Learned counsel for the wife, the alleged victim of abduction, states that she has no intention of going back to the petitioner. At this stage, the petitioner who is appearing in person moulds his prayer to submit that he is concerned about the future of the minor children born to him from the wedlock. He therefore, proposes to file an application before the competent court seeking custody of the children. To move such an application is the right of the petitioner for which he needs no directions or 2 observations from this Court. Needless to state that if any such application is filed by the petitioner, the same is required to be disposed off in accordance with law after notice to and hearing all concerned. The application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)