oP- INTHEHIGH Jl?meATURE 0F CHHAT^SQARH ^TBIIASI Oivision Bendl M.A.(C.) No..fat.r7.^.../20l0 Y APPELLANT OWNgR ^halCTadhar Das S/oVfleram JE>as \c? /^f a8®dabout 35 y®ar§,R/o ^ll^e }-•" .y^ UGhcfa^ada. Tafe .......:.^^ ^••^y ^- BiESPGNDBNTS Ucfaeft^ftda, TaMgtt a& Pelice smtioa Dabfe^a, DistNet Janj^r- €h@OELpSL(^,Gr.) VERSUS Smt TaraBaiW/o UteTeejdas ftg^d ^boyt 40 yeajrs, ^ Jaganath Das S/o Teejdas Aged §j|iQUt23 years, ^ Jtagdtsti Das S/o Te^ctas, aged afeseut 2t years, 4[, BIiive. Das, £lg?<d ateo.ut 19 yeai-s, B/QTeejd^, All are Mesident of VUlage Uchehpteda, Tahsil & Poiice sl^.llon Dabhra, DistEict Jsmj^-Champa fQW ^ Divisional Manager, the Oriental InsiffaAee Compaiiy tAGaited, QitaiyaU Bh^svan Korba, District Korba (Insurer) MEMO OE MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL tJNDER SECTIGN 173 OFMOTORVEHICLEAj^T1988 AQAINST TO® A^A^ /ORDER DATED lffl2/2QQ9 P^SSEDm C.T.]^0?'07/2009 ^ BY THE ADDmONAL MOTQR AeCIBgNT CL^MS 'miBUKAL SAKTI DISTRICT JANJGIR-€HAMPA V.. HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARM ^T BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH: HON'BLE MR. I.M.QUDDUSI & HON'BLE MR.PR<4SH^NT KUM^R MISHM/JJ. Appellant ftespondents Misc. Appeal f0 No.673/2010 Chakradhar DdS Vs Smt. Tara Bai & others OR&EftfOran (2nd February. 2011) I.M. Quddusi. J; \-: 1. When the matter is called out, none oppeared on behaff of tiie appellouit. Even in the second call none Gppeared. 2. However, Mr. V.K. ^garwal & Mr. ^hcaishyam Patel, Advocates are present for the respondents No.t to 5 respectively. 3. In view of the above, we have no other option except to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismJssed for non-prosecution, Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge +-