- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1377 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.1377 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.1377 OF 2005 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 19, 2006. : AUGUST 19, 2006. : AUGUST 19, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned A.P.P. for the Applicant. The impugned order has been passed on 10th August 2001. However, the application for certified copy was made on 1st April 2002. There is no explanation whatsoever for gross delay in applying for the certified copy. The certified copy was received on 19th April 2002. However, the Assistant Commissioner Food and Drug Administration, Kolhapur forwarded the papers to the Law and Judiciary Department four months thereafter. There is absolutely no explanation for the said delay. The delay in filing the Appeal against the acquittal is of 403 days. As there is gross delay in applying for certified copy, no case is made out for condonation of delay. Application is rejected. - 2 - JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE