Caveat Petition No._____ of 2010 in/and -1- Civil Revision No.4589 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Caveat Petition No._____ of 2010 in/and Civil Revision No.4589 of 2010 Date of Decision: 26.7.2010 Gurdit Ram …Petitioner Versus Jogender Singh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- Present: Mr. Rajesh Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Lakhanpal, Advocate for the caveator/respondent. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Caveat Petition No._____ of 2010 in/and -2- Civil Revision No.4589 of 2010 1. With the consent of learned Counsel appearing for the parties, present revision petition is being decided in the following terms:- i) Parties shall maintain status-quo pertaining to the possession and nature of the property. ii) Parties shall move application before the competent Court to drop the proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C. in view of the pendency of the civil suit. iii) Receiver shall not auction the lease hold rights of the property in dispute. iv) In the event of filing the application before the Executing Magistrate to drop the proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C. and to recall order of the attachment of the property passed under Section 146 (one of the Cr.P.C.), learned Executing Magistrate shall pass appropriate order thereon. 2. Present petition stands disposed of in the above terms. ( ALOK SINGH ) 26th July, 2010 JUDGE ashish