IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13811 of 2010 NAWAL SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 02.08.2010 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 272, 273, 420 I.P.C. and Section 47(A) of the Excise Act. It is alleged that eight bags containing 930 pouches of country made liquor were seized. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is the tenant in the house in question and recovery has been made from the northern portion of the house whereas the petitioner is tenant in the southern portion of the house. Considering the fact that the seizure has been made, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. However regular bail application of the petitioner will be considered in view of the fact that recovery has not been made from the tenancy portion occupied by the petitioner and the same shall be disposed preferably on the same day. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)