IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.1205 of 2006. Raj Kumar Sharma son of Shri Jai Prakash Sharma. VERSUS Smt. Lalita wife of Shri Raj Kumar & Others Date of Order :::: 09/02/2009. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bhanwaroo Khan None present for the Petitioner Mr.Kishan Swami for Mr.Virendra Agarwal for respondents By the Court : A petition under Section 125 CR.P.C. was submitted by the respondent-wife against the petitioner- husband, which came to be decided by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambhar Lake, Jaipur vide order dated 27.07.2005, wherein an interim maintenance @ Rs.1000/- per month was ordered to be paid in favour of the respondent-wife. The only submission is about the compromise, which has arrived at in between the parties. As per the learned counsel for the petitioner the compromise says that everything has been settled through this compromise deed. The compromise also prohibits for any maintenance, which can be claimed by the respondent. The compromise deed, as produced reveals that the respondent has received the articles given to her at the time of marriage, along with an amount of Rs.30,000/-, which was expended at the time of marriage. It nowhere says that she will not be entitled for any maintenance. The compromise deed is vis-a-vis for articles, which were given to the respondent. The respondent is legally married wife of the petitioner, if any maintenance proceeding pending, she is entitled for the maintenance as claimed by her. I do not find any illegality, infirmity or perversity in the impugned orders passed by the trial Court. No interference is called for by this Court while exercising the inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. There is no merit in this miscellaneous petition and the same deserves to be dismissed. Consequently, this miscellaneous petition stands dismissed. (Bhanwaroo Khan) J. ashok/