IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 722 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 297 OF 2009 MR. SAYED HUSSEIN ... Applicant Versus COLVA CIVIC AND CONSUMER FORUM THROUGH REPRESENTATIVES ... Respondent Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Nigel da Costa Frias, Advocate for the original petitioner. Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Government Advocate for respondents no.1, 3 and 4. Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for respondent No.5. Mr. J. Godinho, Advocate for respondent No.6. Coram:- S.B. DESHMUKH & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 16th September, 2009 P.C. Advocate appearing for the original petitioner has filed an affidavit-in-reply, copy of which is served to the learned Counsel Mr. Sonak appearing for the applicant in this application. 2. The applicant, in this application, is seeking impleadment as party respondent, which is governed under Order 1, Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure. We have perused the documents which are annexed to this application. One of the documents, annexed to the application, is a registered instrument i.e. Agreement of Sale executed by respondent No.5 in the writ petition, in favour of the present applicant. Even, otherwise, the Counsel appearing for the petitioner concedes for allowing this application. 3. The civil application is, accordingly, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Impleadment to be carried out on or before the adjourned date of the writ petition i.e. 24.9.09. The applicant is to be added as party respondent. The Counsel for the petitioner to serve copy of the petition to the added respondent before next date. Mr. Sonak waives notice for the added respondent. Mr. Sonak, learned Counsel appearing for the added respondent is permitted to file affidavit in reply on or before the adjourned date, with advance copy to be served to the Counsel appearing for the petitioner. The civil application is, accordingly, disposed of. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. U. D. SALVI, J. ssm.