IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 16189 of 2008 DAT E OF DECISION: MAY 2, 2011 Smt. Monika Gupta .....Petitioner VERSUS Union of India & others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. KK Kahlon, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 to 4. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The whole dispute in this case revolves around the submission of incomplete application form. The case set up by the respondent-Corporation is that the petitioner had not submitted a requisite affidavit along with the application. This fact, however, is seriously disputed by the counsel for the petitioner, who says that before submitting the application, each and every document was checked on behalf of the petitioner and accordingly, the affidavit, which was got prepared much in advance, could not have been missed from being attached with the application. Submission is that the affidavit was duly annexed with the application and somehow may have been got misplaced by the respondents. Since there is serious dispute in regard to the facts, it would be appropriate to give liberty to the petitioner to lead Civil Writ Petition No. 16189 of 2008 -2- evidence, so that this disputed fact can be properly decided. The petitioner, if so advised, may file a civil suit, where the petitioner would get ample opportunity to prove this factual issue. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to file civil suit. The petitioner is, thus, relegated to her alternative remedy of filing civil suit. May 02, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) monika JUDGE