1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7626 OF 2009 Digambar Navso Raut .. Petitioner versus General Manager, New India Mining Corporation .. Respondents Mr.G.J.Sabnis for the petitioner. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 6th January 2010. P.C: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The petitioner is the original plaintiff. By order dated 28th February 2007 the learned trial Judge declined to grant relief of temporary injunction in favour of the petitioner. An appeal was preferred by the petitioner which has been dismissed. It is not in dispute that from 28th February 2007, there is no interim or ad-interim relief operating in favour of the petitioner. 2. After having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, I find that there is no reason to interfere in writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. There is a prima facie finding recorded by the Courts below that the petitioner was not in possession. No case is made out for interference with discretionary orders of the Courts below. Petition is rejected. Hearing of the suit is expedited. 3. It is obvious that the suit will be decided on its own merits without being influenced by the impugned order and confirmation thereof by this Court. (A.S.OKA,J)