RESPONDENTS: » 1. Assistant COmmissioner of Incomet‘E‘ circle (1), Raipur (ma) 2. Assistant Commissioner of Incom’e1;a$ Waxd 2 (2)-cum— New Assessee Ward, Vi gm r Income Tax Office, Nagpur (M.B.)‘ ' Vi 5. Commissioner of Income Tax, _ $1 Jabalp'iiz' (M.P. ) PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF mm GONSTITumow; ;[ NDIA. k 1 MM”? 7V 7\ / ’ Wir" ' cmnuo111u34 A} ‘ "\ @yf IN THE EEGH‘COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR ' 5 \ BLP.‘ N03 0‘00 92 w H \ _ Pmmioma: Vipin Sethi son of Dinanath Seth'i ; \ aged 37 years, through A17‘corney Ashwin son of Tilakc‘aj Sethi aged 171 ‘ 30 years, reading at Premkunj, civil Lines; Raipur (M.P.) » H ~Ver‘aus— \mW XI—HC-22 EW,WF%W WWW mm wgNO . .fZ;(;C>%=[ \% W WW§WW %WW Barve 16.6.2005 Shri Vinny Hari'r,‘ 5r. Advoca‘fe wi-rh ShPi Ashok Swarnakar, Advocafe for +he pe‘rifioner. Nana for The respon‘den 1's. Heard. Learned Senior Counsel for 'rhe pe‘rifioner submifs ‘rhaf in View of \The order dafed 12 '1 November 1992 fhe impugned arder has been cancelled, +h refore, This paii‘iion has become infrucmous. I In view of The above su mission made by learned counsel for The peTiTioner and order dafed 12m November 1992, fhe , wrif pefifion is dismissed as h ving become infruc‘iuous. The order filed by iarned Senior Counsel for fhe peTi-‘iioner be kepi on record. Sdl- L.c.BHAD°° Judge lJ‘ (@5s’li3i)