SBCWP893/1997 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN 1. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.893/1997 Mali Ram Sharma and Others Vs. The university of Rajasthan, Jaipur 2. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2887/1996 Mohanlal Gupta Vs. The university of Rajasthan, Jaipur Date of Order ::: 16.02.2010 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Pradeep Singh and Shri Amit Singh, Counsel for petitioners in both writ petitions Dr. Y.C. Sharma, Counsel for respondent University #### By the Court:- These two writ petitions were filed by petitioners against orders by which their services were sought to be terminated. Writ Petition No.2887/1996 is filed by petitioner Mohan Lal Gupta against order dated 11.06.1996 by which earlier order dated 10.06.1996 appointing him as L.D.C., was kept in abeyance till further orders. This Court. while issuing notice of the writ petition. stayed operation of order dated 11.06.1996 and that is how petitioner continued in service SBCWP893/1997 // 2 // with the respondent. Writ Petition No.893/1997 was subsequently filed by petitioners Mali Ram Sharma and others, by which they challenged order dated 03.02.1997 whereby Registrar of respondent University cancelled earlier order dated 30.01.1997 regarding appointment of petitioners on post of L.D.C. This Court, vide order dated 25.04.1997, directed that like petitioner Mohan Lal Gupta in Writ Petition No.2887/1996, they also be allowed to continue on post of L.D.C. Both the matters were ordered to be tagged. Learned counsel for petitioners in Writ Petition No.893/1997 has produced for perusal of the Court a copy of order dated 22.01.2010 which is taken on the record. This order makes it clear that the petitioners in both the writ petitions have since been regularized in service on recommendations of a Committee constituted by respondent University and have been placed on probation for a period of one year. Learned counsel for petitioners however submit that petitioners should be held entitled for consequential benefits because they have been continuing in service of respondent University for last more than 13 years, albeit on the strength of interim order passed by this SBCWP893/1997 // 3 // Court. The writ petitions were filed against the orders by which the petitioners were sought to be discontinued from services by respondent University; and, operation and effect of those orders were stayed therefore the petitioners continued in the service with the respondent. Now that, they have been regularized in service, therefore that issue no longer survives. However, with regard to any other benefits, the petitioners would be at liberty to approach the respondent and may, if not granted, take such recourse as may be available to them in law. With the liberty aforesaid, both the writ petitions are disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//