IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12483 of 2010 GUDDU MIAN @ SALUDDIN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 7.7.2010. Heard. Considering the allegation against the petitioner that he was driving the vehicle or as appears noted by the Hon’ble Judge who passed the first rejection order, the petitioner was caught on chase, the court is not inclined to direct the release of the above named petitioner on bail in a case which relates to kidnapping of a boy of eight years. However, it appears from the report of the court below that 13 witnesses out of 17 have been examined and four witnesses are only to be examined during the trial of Sessions Trial No.953 of 2007 arising out of Adapur(Harpur)P.S.Case No.100 of 2007. It is hereby directed that the Superintendent of Police, East Champaran, Motihari shall ensure by issuing an order to the Officer-in-Charge of Adapur(Harpur) police station to produce the remaining four witnesses within a period of three months who shall be examined on a day to day basis whereafter the court below shall - 2 - proceed to examine the accused persons if it appears necessary under Sections 313 of the Cr.P.C. and thereafter shall take defence evidence if the same is tendered by the accused persons. At any rate, the court below shall have to hand out the judgement to the petitioner or any other accused who could be on trial on that case within a maximum period of five months from the date he receives a copy of the present order or the same is produced before him by any of the accused persons of the case. If the trial is not disposed of within that period then the petitioner shall be released on bail by the court below, i.e., Additional Sessions Judge, IIIrd, East Champaran, Motihari to the above noted case. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to Superintendent of Police, East Champaran, Motihari for information and compliance. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )