CRP 232/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B D AGARWAL The case was taken up for final hearing with the consent of lear ned counsel for both the sides. This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner, challen ging the order dated 01.06.2010, passed by the learned Civil Judge No. 2, Kamrup , Guwahati, in Title Suit No. 99 of 2008, refusing to give further time to the p laintiff to adduce evidence. Heard Sri N Rajkhowa, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S U Mazumdar, learned counsel for the respondent. As per the impugned order, the prayer for adjournment was turned down since the plaintiff had already exhausted the statutory period of adjournm ent. According to the learned counsel, the evidence could not be given in the Co urt as the petitioner was suffering from critical bleeding during the menstruati on period. Admittedly, no medical certificate was submitted in the Court. Be tha t as it may, in the interest of justice, I am of the view that a last chance can be given to the plaintiff to adduce evidence in the trial Court. Accordingly, t he impugned order is set aside. The trial Court is directed to allow the plainti ff to adduce her evidence and other witnesses subject to payment of a cost of Rs . 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand)Only in the trial Court. Both the parties are directed to appear in the trial Court on 21 .11.2011 and receive further directions. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this revision pe tition stands disposed of.