^ .v ^lii. ji K»'" ri^' XI-HG—78 'TS( ^wwii^ w^ww, wviwy. ff an^r w Wi* ^SH 3?Tt?T'^rqh? '>.; WRCtT <t»*1|eh "W^ 200 sn^r 'TSRT (i°if^«f<^r) ?^<ITW ^lfpT 311^1 ^?.P. (St No.5432/2008 PETITIONBR Vanjiuna Prasad Upadhyaya, aged about 48 yeaifs, son of Shri Ramlakhan, Resident of I.E.M- School, Jhagrakhand, District- Korea (CG} KBSPONDBWra 1, Stal Dep D.K\ The District Education Officer, Korea, District- Koi^a, C.G. 3. I.E. Col|ieiy Disft 4. Thel S.B. HOirBLE 8HM DHIRJftMDRA MISHRA. J. «' . 29.09.2008 Shri R.K. Jaiswal, Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Heard. With the cousent oftlii By ttus petition, fh^ Teacher ul I.E.M. Pnmark' claiiauig the benefits of 5*^ part iu the Goveriunent <*i<l^1l "W^ff ^f^^ <f^(-^l< ^siRnaiiin Versus le of Chliattisgarh, through -Secretaiy, ^rtiaent of School Education, Maatralaya, .S. Bhawaa, Ralpur (CG) M. School, through - Headmaster-Singhi Education Society, Jhagarakhand, t.-Korea (CG) Director, Directorate, Public Institution, Pada, Raipiu- (CG) Penlsion Writ Petttioa U/A 2fi6/a27 ofthe Coastttution oflndia co4nsel for fhe petitioner. Pafiel Lawyer for the State. parties, the matter is heard fuiaUy. petitioner, who is working as Assistaat School, Jhagrakhand, District-Korea is Pay Comnussion at par witfa their counter S<j'hools. The 5th Pay Coiiuuission was to be 1; 'i ^.11 1II 11 XI-HC—78 ll^fTI ft-fi* aIT 3T^?T sb^l^) Tsf "4i^id-4, y'dly^l'i, f»«rii'yti< WtfCTT (frHlch TFt 200 3n^t '^^' (lcif-i'!<<T) TOIIW^fetSIT^'I z. granted with effect fiom 't>l<<ii?l<il-f Mltlftf 4 ft^l <Rn«ri<. ^? aifipT gii^r 1.1.1996 in accordance with the Madhya Pradesh Revision of Pay Rufes, 1998. This Court by fhe judfement and order dated 6.2.2007 in the case ofSmt.ALaU Vs. State ol[ Chhattisgarh aud otfaer coanected matters (W.P. No.4108 of 2005) hel}l fhat fhe teachers worldng iu Govemmeut aided schoojs are entitled tt» the benefit of reconuneadations of the •5al Pay Coiamission. Afiter fhe 4ecision ofthis Coiirt, the petitioner has filed this petition on 24.9.2008 cjainung for the same relief. Leamed coiinsel appjearmg for the petitioner submits fhat the petitioner has made repres^ntation ou 2.8.2008 (Anaexure P-2) to the respondents authorities. It ^as not consaiered at all. In view of fhe fact t^iat fhe representation of the petitioner is pending consideration beft(re authority conceined, the respondents autfaorities are accordingfy (^irected to consider his representatk>n dated 2.8.2008 (Aimexurc P-2) accordance with law, on its Ipendiug before tfae respondent No.l in |)wn inerits, in the Ught ofthe judgment asd orderdated 6.2.2007 passe^ by this Court ia the matterofSmt. A Lall Vs. State pf CUhattis^rh ^ad other connected matters (supta) The petitiou is accord^agly disposed of. ^^^'"^' 1 "-S^: jy-