IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24094 of 2011 Md. Habib Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02. 09.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of informant opposes the prayer of bail. Petitioner is alleged for abducting informant’s wife and his wife is examined under section 164 of the Cr. P.C. which lacks purpose for abduction. She was kept by the petitioner and his wife in the house in which they were residing. She was allowed to move in market also, though in company of this petitioner and his wife, if was forbidden to disclose the abduction appears not probable. Petitioner remained in custody since 29.01.2011. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R.P. Asthana, Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-Vth, Saharsa in connection with S.T. No.139 of 2011 arising out of Bihra P. S. Case No.129 of 2010. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)