IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31677 of 2009 1. Sona Devi, wife of Sukhdeo Mahto. 2. Sita Devi, wife of Rajendra Mahto. 3. Geeta Devi, Daughter of Sukhdeo Mahto. All resident of village-Rajpur, P.S.-Keshariya, District-East Champaran. ……….Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ………..Opp. Party. ----------- 2/ 08.10.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are mother-in-law, Sisters-in-law of the deceased. The offence is alleged under Sections 304 B/34 of the IPC. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the deceased died her natural death due to illness, a false has been instituted by the informant. But there is no allegation in the F.I.R. that due to non-fulfilment of the demand of dowry the daughter of the informant was killed. As such, no case under section 304B was made out against the petitioners. Considering the fact, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioners is allowed, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari in connection with Keshariya P.S. Case No. 57/09 subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)