WPMS No.656 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. G. C. Kandpal, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K. C. Arya, the learned brief holder for the State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The court finds that inspite of time being granted twice to serve the respondent no.3, no steps were taken by the petitioner. On this ground, the writ petition should be dismissed summarily. However, having perused the order, the court finds that the counter claim was filed on 28th March, 2007 before the court below and, for 22 months thereafter, no steps were taken by the plaintiff to file reply to the said counter claim. Consequently, the court below rightly rejected the application for enlarging the time to the plaintiff to file a reply to the counter claim. This court does not find any palpable error in the impugned order. The writ petition fails and is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 15.07.2010 LSR