IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.5474 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 29th July, 2010 Amarjit Singh … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Rakesh Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Puri, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the State. Mr. I.S. Sidhu, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. Mr. Amit Rawal, Advocate for the applicant-Shree Luxmi Narain Mandir. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner states that the building plan submitted by the petitioner has been sanctioned and the alleged violations have been compounded. Mr. I.S.Sidhu, Advocate appearing for respondents No.2 and 3, submits that only those violations, which were permissible, have been compounded and the Municipal Corporation shall strictly enforce compliance of the sanctioned site plan. After hearing counsel for the parties, present writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the Municipal Corporation shall ensure that the building is strictly in consonance with the building plan sanctioned on 2nd June, 2009. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE July 29, 2010 rps