IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8662 of 2011 1. Akhtar Alam, S/O Late Md. Nassurddin. 2. Monir Alam, S/O Nabi Rasul. Both R/O Village- Anandpur, P.S.- Jagarnatha, P.S.- Uncjkagaon, District- Gopalganj. ……. Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through Collector, Gopalganj. 2. Maharani Durgeshwari Sahi, W/O Late Gopeshwar Sahh. 3. Susumita Sahi D/O Late Gopeshwar Sahi. Both R/O Village- Estate Hathwa, P.O. and P.S.- Hathwa, District- Gopalganj, At present Hathwa House, East Gandhi Maidan, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Patna. 4. Samsul Hoda, S/O Ali Hussain. 5. Salamat Ali, S/O Sahed Hussain. 6. Samsuddin, S/O Sahed Hussain. 7. Smt. Hahanunia, D/O Nabi Hussain. 8. Md. Mustafa, S/O Nabi Rasul 9. Sharmila Khatoon, S/O Nabi Rasul. 10. Smt. Gaush Bano, W/O Md. Hssain 11. Adalat Miaya, S/O Nasiruddin 12. Md. Kalamuddin, S/O Md. Hussain. 13. Taibun Nessa, D/O Md. Hussain. 14. Kaimul Nessa, D/O Md. Hussain. 15. Hasbun Nessa, D/O Md. Hussain. 16. Shamshul Hoda, S/O Ali Hussain. 17. Masuram Ali, S/O Ali Hussain. 18. Jannat Khatoon, D/O Ali Hussain. 19. Salamat Ali, S/O Late Saheb Hussain 20. Samsuddin, S/O Late Saheb Hussain. 21. Mohar Mian, S/O Late Nabi Rasul. 22. Sarmina Khatoon, D/O Late Mahamenat Hussain. 23. Smt. Gauswami, W/O Late Md. Hussain. 24. Abre Alam, S/O Late Md. Nasiruddin. 25. Mustafa Alam, S/O Md. Nasiruddin. 26. Akhatar Alam, S/O Md. Nasiruddin. 27. Rabairul Nessa, D/O Md. Nasiruddin. 28. Bibi Mohfujan, D/O Md. Nasiruddin. 29. Md. Kamaluddin, S/O Late Md. Hussain. 30. Taibu Nessa, D/O Late Md. Hussain. 31. Basir Alam, S/O Md. Alam. 32. Wasir Alam, S/O Md. Alam. All are R/O Village- Asandapur, P.S. - Jagranatha, P.S. - Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj. 33. Noor Tara Khatoon, D/O Md. Alam. 34. Ghaukat Ali, S/O Samsul Haque. 35. Abdul Salam, S/O Samsul Haque, All R/O Village- Salehpur, P.S.- Bishambharpur, District- Gopalganj. 36. Jahanara Khatoon, D/O Nasruddin. 37. Tunna S/O Amir. 2 38. Munna, S/O Amir. 39. Jhuna, S/O Amir. All are R/O Village- Asaudi Mahudwa, District- Gopalganj …..Opposite Party…Respondent Ist. 40. Prem Sagar Tiwary, S/O Gauri Shankar Tiwary. 41. Suresh Tiwary, S/O Sukhsagar Tiwary. 42. Ram Sagar Tiwary, S/O Gauri Shankar Tiwary. All are R/O Village- Pokharbhinda, P.O.- Jagarnatha, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj. 43. Umrawati Devi, D/O Gaurishankar Tiwary, R/O Village- Mishies Sonahula, P.S. - Gopalpur, District- Gopalganj. 44. Shanti Devi, D/O Sukh Sagar Tiwary, R/O Village- Banjaria, P.O.- Sasamusa. 45. Binda Devi, D/O Sukhsagar Tiwary, R/O Village- Harpur, P.S.- Regunakpur, Dist.- Siwan. 46. Vidyawati Devi, D/O Sukh Sagar Tiwary, R/O Village- Pathkauli, P.S. and District- Gopalganj. 47. Pramod Pandey, S/O Babban Pandey. 48. Kameshwar Pandey, S/O Babban Pandey. 49. Khushendra Pandey, S/O Babban Pandey. 50. Premshila Pandey, S/O Babban Pandey. 51. Dharamshila Pandey, S/O Babban Pandey. All are R/O Village- Pandey Samail, P.O.- Koeladewa, District- Gopalganj. ……Opp. Partties…Respondent 2nd Set. 52. Loknath Dixit, S/O Late Indrasah Dixit, R/O Village- Raghunathpur, P.O.- Ratanpura, P.S.- Fulwariya, District- Gopalganj. 53. Ramjee Pandey, S/O Bashishtha Pandey, R/O Village- Kushaundhi, P.S.- Mirganj, District- Gopalganj. 54. Uma Choudhary, S/O Sri Bishwanath Choudhary, R/O Village- Shankej Ramdas, P.O.- Jagarnatha, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj. ….Respondents. ---------------------------------- 02- 8.12.2011 Heard Mr. S.S. Dwivedi, learned senior counsel for the petitioners. Learned counsel for the State is also present. 2. This writ application has been filed by way of last resort by the petitioners due to sheer frustration on their part that even after a decree in their favour dated 8.2.1963 which has attained finality, the fruits of the same have not yet 3 reached the petitioners since Execution Case No.12 of 1976 with regard to the said decree till date has not been taken to its logical conclusion. This Court can only express its shock and displeasure at such a state of affairs. In the aforementioned background, this Court feels that at least now the petitioners should not be further disadvantaged inspite of a valid decree and order being in their favour. 3. Accordingly, the writ application stands disposed off with a direction to the learned Munsif, Gopalganj, before whom Execution Case No. 12 of 1976 is pending with regard to execution of decree dated 8.2.1963 passed in Title Suit No.69 of 1960, to ensure that the proceedings are taken to their logical conclusion as expeditiously as possible and latest within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order before the court concerned. 4. Though the writ application has been disposed off but in the present case the Court feels that the court concerned, i.e. the learned Munsif, Gopalganj shall also be required to send a report regarding compliance of this order to this Court. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) S.K.Pathak/