IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2217 of 2008 NIRMAL YADAV Versus MOHAN YADAV & ORS ----------- 2. 15.1.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court there does not seem to be any infirmity in the impugned order, inasmuch as the court which has at least on two occasions already exercised its mind in the matter of framing of issues, by orders dated 12.9.2006 and 15.6.2007, has only gone to hold that if there would be any such need of issue being sought to be added by the plaintiff petitioner the same will be taken into consideration in due course. Such approach of the court below is quite in fitness with the pleadings on record because if it has gone to analyse such pleadings for recording a finding that at least for the time being there was no such pleading or requirement for framing an additional issue as to whether the signature of Salil Dutta and Sulekha Kumari on Vakalatnama and the written statement on their behalf was forged or otherwise, this Court would not interfere in such order of 2 the court below. Apparently there is no jurisdictional error in such approach of the court below and accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/