IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1736 of 2009 JWALA PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 2.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. By order dated 16.12.2008 passed in C.W.J.C. No.17363 of 2008, one week peremptory time was allowed to learned counsel for the petitioner to remove defect No. (M), as pointed out in the stamp report, which required the blank portion to be filled up in paragraph No. 2 (iv). On 23.12.2008 the last date for compliance of the peremptory order, the petitioner filed a supplementary affidavit stating that the copy supplied by the State Information Commission itself did not contain the said details and hence, the same could not be filled up and the said defect should, therefore, be ignored. However, the same was not taken into account or put up for consideration of the Court by the office and it was noted that the case stood dismissed for default. In the above circumstances, C.W.J.C. No.17363 of 2008 is directed to be restored to its original file. - 2 - It is made clear that the defect No. (M) shall be ignored. The restoration application is, accordingly, disposed of. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )