IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 5520 of 2009 Between: K. Sudarshan R/o. 3-117, Hanumannagar, Dilsukhnagar Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer Madapur, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an Order direction or a writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Habeas corpus directing the Respondents herein to produce the son of the Petitioner namely K. Umesh Goud before this Hon'ble Court who was illegally detained by the police of Madapur on 13.3.2009 at 10.30 P.M. apprehending danger to his life and set him at liberty forthwith and to pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: TELEGRAM Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following : ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy) This writ petition is filed on the basis of the telegram dated 14.03.2009 sent to the Hon’ble the Chief Justice alleging that his son, namely, K. Umesh Goud, has been illegally detained by the Police of Madapur since 13.03.2009 and apprehending danger to his life. Pursuant to the directions of this Court the petitioner is present in the Court. Sri L. Ravindra Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the alleged detenu has been released by the police and he is freely moving in the village. The counter allegations shows that a case in Crime No.138 of 2009 for the offence punishable under Sections 420 and 468 IPC of Madhapur Police Station has been registered on 6.03.2009 on the allegation that the alleged detenu has created forged documents pertaining to Plot No.340 in Sy.Nos.37, 38, 41 and 42 of Guttala Begumpet, to an extent of 200 sq. yards and sold to the complainant. In connection with the above crime, the alleged detenu was called to the police station on 13.03.2009 and after enquiry he left the police station on the same day with an assurance that he would produce the relevant documents to establish his case, but did not turn up as promised. In view of the same, as and when the alleged detenu is taken into custody, he should be produced before the concerned Magistrate in connection with the above crime, after due intimation to the petitioner herein. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. ___________________ (A.GOPAL REDDY, J.) _____________ (K.C. BHANU, J.) 20th April, 2009 Js.