IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.663 of 2008 SRI LALLAN KUMAR MAHTHA Versus SRI ATUL KUMAR ----------- 2. 11.12.2008 Surendra/ Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order passed under section 15 of the B.B.C.Act does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. The plea of the petitioner that certain advance was given to the vendor of the present landlord before filing of the eviction suit is of no avail and in fact the petitioner cannot force his right as with regard to settlement of that advance in the eviction suit. That being so, the petitioner must comply the impugned order passed by the court below by making the entire payment of error and current within a period of one month from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order, failing which the defence of the petitioner shall stand automatically struck off. With the aforementioned observation, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)