1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2462/2006 Smt. Anjali Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :: 14.8.2007 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. A.K. Singh, for the petitioner. .... This petition for writ is preferred to challenge the order dated 14.7.2005 passed by the Addl. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bikaner rejecting the appeal preferred by the petitioner under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994. In brief facts of the case are that the Gram Panchayat made an allotment of land in favour of the petitioner while exercising powers under Rule 157 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996. The Administration and Establishment Committee of Panchayat Samiti, Bikaner by an order dated 8.11.2004 cancelled the allotment made in favour of the petitioner and also the Patta issued in consequent thereto as under Rule 157 of the Rules of 1996 the provision is only for making allotment of constructed houses and not of open land. The appellate authority while concurring with the order passed by the Administration and Establishment Committee of Panchayat Samiti, Bikaner held that the Patta was wrongly granted to the petitioner. 2 I have examined the orders and found that open land was allotted to the petitioner by exercising powers under Rule 157 of the Rules of 1996, whereas Rule 157 relates to allotment of a constructed house. I do not find any error in the order impugned that may warrant interference of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, this petition for writ is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR ),J. jgoyal