—-¥ ig, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Criminal hflisc. Petition No.175 of 2011 APPLICANTS: RESPONDENT: Abdul Bari Ansari, (Abdul Ansari) S/o Abdul Khalik Ansari, aged about 53 years, Resident of Ambedkar Nagar, P.S. Charcha, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Korea (Chhattisgarh) Hafiz Ahmad, S/o Abdul Ansari, aged about 25 years, Resident of Mohanpur, P.S. and District Giridih (Jharkhand) Rajiya Bano W/o Peer Mohammad, aged about 29 years, Resident of Mistry Para, Aasansole (West Bengal) Vereys State of Chhattisgarh, Through District Magistrate, Baikunthpur, District Korea (Chhattisgarh) {Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure} Present: Mr. Prakash Tiwari, counsel forthe petitioners. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jha, Deputy Govt, Advocate for the State/ respondent. Single Bench: Hon'ble^Mr. T.P.^iharma.j ORAL ORDER (7-4-2011) 1. Heard on I.A.No.2 for exemption from filing fair copy ofAnnexure A-5. 2. On due consideration, I.A.No.2 is allowed. The petitioners are hereby exempted from filing fair copy ofAnnexure A-5. 3. Also heard on admission. 4. By this petition under Section 482 of the CrPC, the petitioners have prayed for quashment of criminal proceeding pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Baikunthpur in Criminal Case No.34/2010 forthe offence punishable under Sections 498A, 323 and 506 read with Section 34 ofthe IPC againstthe petitioners. 5. I have perused copy of charge sheet and other documents, especially the FIR. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that cause of action of the present case accrued in the territorial jurisdiction of Giridih (Jharkhand) within the jurisdiction of the State of Jharkhand and not within the jurisdiction of Korea. Therefore, continuance of criminal case against the petitioners before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Baikunthpur, District Korea would only be abuse of the process of the Court. 7. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the petition. 8. As per the FIR, the incident took place within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court situate at Korea and while taking cognizance the Court below has not committed any illegality requiring interference in exercise of extra ordinary inherent jurisdiction. Consequently, the petition is liable to be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed, in limine. 9. In view ofthis order, I.A.No.1 stands disposed of. Soma Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge