IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9366 of 2008 SK.AKHTAR @ SEIKH AKHTAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.16974 of 2008 SANTOSH TANTI @ SANTOSHI TANTI Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.16963 of 2008 SETABUR RAHMAN @ SATABUR & ABDUL BASIR & PRAHLAD RABIDAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.17660 of 2008 MD. DULAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 3.7.2008 Heard. The four petitions arise out of one case i.e. Amadabad P.S.Case no.75 of 2007 under Sections 397 and 396 IPC. Neither of the six petitioners is named in the FIR and they have not been put on test identification parade in spite of being in custody. Nothing has been recovered from either of them. The learned A.P.P. concedes that there could not be any material meaningful in the case diary except that their names have appeared in the confessional statement of a co-accused. Considering the material and the contentions, let the above named six petitioners be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/-(three thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M.Katihar in the above noted case. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )