IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32736 of 2009 GAJO YADAV, SON OF SRI HARI YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JARLAHI BANDH, P.S. KURSELA, DISTRICT-KATIHAR………………………..PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhola Prasad, Advocate. For the State : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. --------- 3. 30.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no fire arm injury upon the informant. It has also been submitted that there is dispute between the family of the petitioner and the informant due to which the entire family of the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and all other co-accused except the petitioner had already been granted bail by the court below itself. It is stated the injury report, which had been called for, suggests - 2 - that the injury no.1, on the right forearm of the informant, is lacerated wound, caused by hard and blunt substance, whereas the opinion with regard to injury no.2 has been reserved. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Gajo Yadav, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No.17/2009. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)