s< HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS W.P. (St No.6991/2009 Smt. Chetna Dadsena, Wife of Shri Bhikham Lal Dadsena, aged about 25 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, Govt. Middle School, Village Achaud, Janpad Panchayat Gundardehi, Distt. Durg (C.G). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG.) 2. District Collector, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G). 3. District Education Dhamtari (C.G). Officer, Distt. 4. District Education Officer, Durg (C.G). 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (CG). 6. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Gundardehi, Distt. Durg (C.G). (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution oflndiat Appearance : Shri Shiv Kumar Dadsena, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Prashun Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer, for the State/ respondents 1 to 4. ORAL ORDER (27.11.20091 SUNIL KUMAR SINHA^J, Petitioner Smt.Chetna Dadsena is working on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-III in Government Middle School, Achaud. Her husband namely Bhikham Lal Dadsena is working as Headmaster in Government Aided School namely Shanti Sarowar School, Arjuni, Distt. Dhamtari. ^ Shri Shiv Kumar Dadsena, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made a representation W.P ('S)No..6991/2009 (Annexure P-8) for transfer from her present place of posting to the place where her husband is working. He submits that there is a policy of the Government which has been issued vide Circular dt. 28.1.2007. His prayer is that the concerned authority/authorities should be directed to dispose of the representation at the earliest so that the petitioner gets some relief. This limited prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the counsel for the State. However, the State Counsel submits that some reasonable time may be granted to the concerned authority/authorities to dispose of the matter. On due consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that if so advised the petitioner may file a fresh copy of the representation dated 28.10.2009 (Annexure P-9) alongwith a copy of this writ petition and the order before the concerned authorities within a period of 15 days from today and if such a representation is filed, the concerned authority/authorities shall be obliged to dispose of the same at the earliest. With the aforesaid direction/obser^ations, this writ petition stands finally disposed of. — No order as to costs. §d/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ^