(€1366/A 3mm BENCH IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(5) No. 7 (o°>9a /2o1o /i 1. Kanhcu'ycx La! Kanwar, S/o Anjor Singh, aged abouT 53 year‘s, Headmas’rer, Gov’r. iddle School, Dumarpara, lok—Sak‘ri, DisTf. Jonjgir- Champa (6.6.) 2. Hemkumar' Rafhore, S/o Late Shri Banshilal, aged abouT 57 ear's, Upper Division Teacer, GOVT. Middio School, Kurdo, Block -Sak’ri, Disf’r. Janjgir—Champa (6.6.) 3‘ Kundcm Lal Khande, S/o unkoo Ram, aged about 58 year's, Headmaster, Govt . Block -sakti, Disii. Janjgir- PETITI‘ONERS Champa (C‘G.) RESPONDENTS 1 1. S’ra’re of Chha‘l’risgorh Through :— The Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) [L M BC y h M I VERSUS Dis’rr'icf Educafion Officer, DisTT. Janjgir—Champa (6.6.) Block Educafion Officer, Sak’ri, Disf’r. Jangir—Champa (C.G.) Joint Director, Treasury, Account & Pension, Bilaspur, DisT‘r.—Bilasr (C.G.) W§IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF T CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. pu HE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotrit J. Present :- Shri A.S. Rajput, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 6th day of January, 2011) 1. The petitioners were initially appointed on a fixed pay of Rs.100/— & ‘ Rs.150/~:After completion of the probation period, the petitioners were granted regular pay scale. i 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after + completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O'.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of MP. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers were entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Supreme Cozurt'tiriTSpecial Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/ Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from date of initial appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners also submits that this I court, while considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others v. x State of Chhattisgarh & others [WP (S) No.4725/2006] by order WRIT PETITION (S) NO.7698 OF 2010 PETITIONERS Kanhaiya Lal Kanwar & Others Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others dated 01.09.2006, allowed the petitioner to make a representation within a period of ten days, raising all their grievances. Accordingly, the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation raising all the grievances and in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if anyO, in accordance with law and the aforestated decisions, on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, subject to verification of the facts. In view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. / ,N’ S \ \ Sat‘sh wége \ \ \ pIv ‘