$- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 9 + TR.P.(C.) 8/2010 MADHUBALA Petitioner Tlirough Mr. Raliul Nagpal with Mr. Kumar Dushyant Singh, Advocate versus SANJAY KUMAR ARORA .....Respondent Tlirough Counsel (appearance not given) CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER % 18.05.2010 1. The prayer in this petition for the transfer of the divorce proceedings in H.M.A. No. 499 of 2009 {Sanjay Kumar Arora v. Madhubala) from the court of the learned Additional District Judge ('ADJ'), Karkardooma to a court of competent jurisdiction at Rohini along with an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 ('HMA') filed by the Petitioner in the said petition. 2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court considers it to be in the interests of justice to allow the transfer petition as prayed for. 3.. Accordingly, the H.M.A. No. 499 of 209 titled Sanjay Kumar Arora v. Madhubala, along with the application under Section 24 HMA and all other pending applications, is transferred from the court of the learned ADJ at Karkardooma to the court of a corresponding T» D /r) a/nnin Pane 1 of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified jurisdiction at Rohini. It is made clear that allowing of this transfer petition is not to be construed as an expression of an opinion on the merits of the matter. The contentions of both the parties are left open. 4. The records of HMA No. 499 of 2009 {Sanjay Kumar Arora v. Maclhubala) be placed before the Judge-In-Charge at Rohini for allocation of the case to an appropriate court. 5. The petition is disposed of. S. MURALIDHAR, J MAY 18, 2010 rk Tr D /r) a/intn n t I