IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP-T No. 8713/2008 Decided on:15.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Smt. Mari Devi. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioners : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No.1 to 3. Respondent No.4 already ex parte. None for respondent No.5. ____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner has assailed appointment of respondent No.5 Parmanand Thakur. Suitability of petitioner and respondent No.5 has been gone into by a duly constituted Selection Committee. Petitioner has been awarded 19 marks and respondent No. 5 has been awarded 21 marks. Since the suitability of both the candidates has been gone into by 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 a duly constituted Selection Committee, this Court will not sit in appeal over the same. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 15.12.2010 *awasthi*