CWP No.10525 of 2010.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10525 of 2010 Date of decision : 28.05.2010 Darshan Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL **** Present: Ms. Simranjeet Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 28.4.2010 (Annexure P-2), passed by respondent No.4 vide which respondent No.5 has been promoted from the post of Auction Recorder to that of Mandi Supervisor by ignoring the claim of the petitioner for the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has made a representation dated 10.4.2010 (Annexure P-4) ventilating the claim as set up in the writ petition even before passing the impugned order to respondent No.3 but no action has been taken thereon so far. Learned counsel further states that since respondent No.5 has been promoted by respondent No.4, the petitioner shall feel satisfied in case a time-bound direction is issued to respondent No.4 1 CWP No.10525 of 2010.doc to consider and decide the aforesaid representation after hearing the affected parties. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-4) within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order by passing a speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as respondent No.5. May 28, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) atulsethi JUDGE 2