a.1i- I-H L. * lAAtu^d; ii-ri-ir^nif INTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH ATBILASPUR W.A. N0. l°s\ /2010 (D.B.) ~ APPELLANT .<?!.^^--^., .^•^^ ^^. L. '4t/1>:' ^--y^y ^- y€s'\.^' A^"" RESPONDENTS P.ESPofUPEMT^ Ashok Kumar Chandrakar, aged about 46 years, S/o late Shri S.P. Chandrakar, Block Education Officer Pali, Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS , 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 2. The &y. Secretary, Adim Jgti Tatha Anusuchit Jati, Vikas Vibhag, Rdipur.&istt. Raipur (C.6.) 3. TheCommissiOner Tribal Welfare bepartment Chhattisgasrh, Government, Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Collector, Distt. Korba(C.G.) 5. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, bistt. Korba (C.6.) 6. T. Ashir Kumar, Principal Higher Secondary School, Noonera (Pali) Distt.Korba (C.6.) 7. Mahaveer Prasad Chandra, Shiksha Karmi 6rade-I, Govt. 1-figher Secondary Schoot,Lafa Block, Pali, bistt. Korba(C.G.) WRIT APPEAL A6AINST THE FINAL ORbER UNDERRULE 158 (10) (B) OF THE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTESGARH RULES 2007 1 s HI(m^eQlJRT<)FC^HAa^S©ARH®J^B^ fe l,:,.:;,''::?.'WmtiApp]^i,:N6.'.^^^ I APPEEIANT AshokKumar Chandrakar % PEimi6NE» ' ; ,.. ' ^ ^ .' 1"; 1:. •: '• ^' Versus " RKSI^NBENl'S ^ StateoEehhattisgarh DB:-;HO]^I^!lS8tai.i[^^QU@EiUSlW-:^^ "•••' '—': ' . ^ MON'Bl^SHRliW.K.AC^RWAL.JJ PRESENT;- . . 1'. : •...'-..-' ; : ; : ^' • ' ShnAriil Singh Rajput, Ad\TOeatefer^heappellant. Shn G.D. %a^Sni, Gpvt.iAd^ "T ' . .. '. l.'"::.',:'; l:.l.'i^:RA'L • 0'R:B::E:'R • • •. , : •-.'. • ';11 — •;- (28-6-2010) 1. Heard. ; • : : ,:^' .-•:.' : 1: ;~ : ! ' ' ' 2. This writ appeal has been liled against the Qrder dated^^^^ 2010 passed m°WP;(S) I^-^^^^ Single Judge has dismissed the wnt petition. 3; The •writ 'petition was^filed against the impugned order of transfer^of .the^etitioner^appell^t he^ wlio has been trass'Krre^ ff(sta°'^^'pci^<S^ the post of Prmcipal, ©ovt;Higher Secondary School, Podi LtprQda and by Ahe impiigned brder Igamed Single Judge disrnissed the writpetitiQn. 4. We feel that endsofjiistice wpuld be served ifth is disposed of with liberty" t6 the writ appellant t6 niove a representatioh against llis order 6f transfer or &>r iresh transfer ihdicating his problems and dafficulties. If such representatipn is moved, we hope and trust tliat the sanie will be considered syinpathetically. 5, The writ appeal isaccordirigly disppsedof. Sd/- t.M. Quddusi Jfldge Sd/- N.K.Agrawal 1 Judge 3