IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATOTtE AT BIIASPUR(C.G.) W.P. No. 2-S 2^/2001 PETITIONER ^ i^-r"^" ^>€^-^"' >"^K^ . •^" ^ 10-'y • ^- 'Wl'5l"-...9\ ^''y'^^' ^^^" ,y»'^ ..•** ^ KESPONDENTS M.K..Rathore,. S/0/ Bodhram Rathore, Aged about 33 years, Assistant Teach.er, Mic^dle Sehool, Sarkho, Tahsil Janjgir, Dist.Janjgir-Champa (C.G Versus 1.^^'State of Chbattisgarh, Through Secretary, DepartmentofSchoolEducation, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Janjgir — Champa (C.G.) 4. State Administrative Tribanal Of M.P.& C.G. Bench at Raipur Through its Registrar, RAIPUR. Sl 118 BIH Bulli-' 1 118 6Ii WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE COHSII'EUTTON OF INDIA FOR ISSOANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATUKE OS' CERTIORaRI, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION QR ANY OTHER SOITABLE WRIT OR WRI2S, OKDER OR OBDERS AND DIBECTION OR DIRECIXOBFS. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER; : As shown above in the cause title. PARTICUIARS OF THE BESPONDENTS : .As shown above in the cause title XI-HC-22 's^ -ill<fl<"t'i|,.:aTil'M*i6, (»i<ii'yy I.: 3)1^1 ^l R-ii.cb SIGBT. ^Rl^^iea 3T(^?r 'q'ra? U-P' ^l-^T-fc^ IWCll g,^j<^'——————————••—-';g^ 200 I°l'b<{tT"" """""' 18.7.2003 : Shri Ashish Shrivastava, ( State bv SIui Gautam. Heard. It is stated by Shri Shri^ -petitioner fhat fhe petitioner respondent no.2 wlio niay be on his representation. In view of fhe submiss petitioner, no furfher, action is Accordingly, it is disposed that in case sucta a represenl within a period of one m.onfh considered and decided expedi .rules, regulations aiid guidelhie^ clear that fbis Coitrt has not nierits of the petitioner's case.-.^ subsists, fhe petitioner.is free to| With the pbservation/dird disposed of. C.C. as per rules. s Sd/- ^ P.C.Naik Judge cbi<<t<n41Ti WT?ff^ [s^ ^R$i< iT3ffP(FI 3)1^1 founsel for the Petitioner. Bhaiduri, Deputy Advocate General. tastava, leamed counsel for fhe f^oi.lld niake a represeatati.on.to dif-ec'lsd to take appropriate action tbe learned jion inade by^counsel for fhe caUed for in this writ petition. ofwillh a directioh to respondeiit no.2 jation is filed by the petitioner Ifrom today, the same shall be •xpedi|dously ia accordance wifh the ^ goveniiag the field. It is aiade expressed any opinion oh the |a 'case any ofher grievance stUl lapproacta, this Court. (ction aforesaid, this petition is Sd/- Fakhruddiri Judge ^pit^^W w