1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 5799/2003 Bheru Singh Chouhan Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Another Date of Order : : 02.02.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. Harish Purohit, for the petitioner. Mr. R.L.Jangid, Additional Advocate General for respondents. By the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner submits that one Amar Chand Gour junior to the petitioner has been given promotion denying the claim of the petitioner. A reply to the writ petition has been filed by the respondents. In reply to para 7 of the writ petition, it has been stated that though Amar Chand Gour was given promotion earlier but after scrutiny, it was found that Amar Chand Gour was given promotion wrongly and as such that has already been withdrawn vide order dated 20.6.2003 copy of which was filed as Anex.R/2. The very foundation of the claim of the petitioner is that his junior Amar Chand Gour was granted promotion, since it has been withdrawn as it was found to be erroneous and therefore, the petitioner has no better claim. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed. (H.R. PANWAR), J. rp