IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4914 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 6.8.2010 Hira Lal Narang .....Petitioner Versus Sushil Kumar Bhardwaj ….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri R.D. Yadav, Advocate, for Shri S.S. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) A perusal of the records shows that the petitioner himself has not examined his witnesses on 21.1.2010; 23.3.2010 and 29.5.2010. In view of the said fact, no directions can be issued to the learned trial Court to decide the suit for possession filed by the petitioner, at this stage. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed. [HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 6.8.2010 ds