1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.6047 OF 2005 Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union. ...Petitioner. Vs. Pune District Security Guards Board & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Ms. Ranjana Todankar i/b. Mr.S. S. Pakale for the Petitioners. Ms. Pallavi Divekar for Respondent No.1. Mr. V. P. Sawant with Mr. A. B. Tajare for Respondent No.2. ..... CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, J. AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. February 2, 2006. P.C. The Petitioner-Union has filed the present petition representing the cause of the Security Guards whose names are listed in Exh.A. Considering the averments in the petition and the reply filed on behalf of the Agency and the principal employer, as also the Board, in our opinion, the only order that can be passed is based on the statement made on behalf of the Petitioner-Union that the Security Guards whose names are listed in Exh.A to apply for registration with the Board. If that be so done, the Board is directed to consider the application and to take steps in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from today. 2 With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Respondent No.2 is exempted from filing the exhibits which were not tagged with the affidavit in view of the order passed. ( F.I. Rebello, J.) (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)