IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 5062 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 22nd March, 2010. Sarup Singh Petitioner through Mr. APS Shergill, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] This order shall dispose of CWP Nos. 5062, 5065, 5071, 5072, 5074 and 5077 of 2010 as common questions of law and facts are involved therein. Notice of motion. Mr. B.S.Chahal, learned DAG, Punjab, accepts notice. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter-affidavit from the respondents. The petitioners are serving as Inspectors in the Punjab Police. Their grievance is two fold. Firstly, they are aggrieved at the orders whereby their seniority has been adversely affected. Secondly, they seek inclusion of their names in the list 'F' from the date when their alleged juniors were included and to grant them consequential promotion as Deputy Superintendent of Police and other service benefits. This Court vide order dated 04.03.2010 passed in CWP No. 566 of 2010 [Ranjit Singh & Ors. V State of Punjab & Ors.], has constituted an Officers-Committee consisting [i] Shri Parag Jain, IPS, IGP/Head Quarters, Punjab Police; [ii] Smt. Gurpreet Kaur Deo, IPS, DIG, Administration, Punjab Police Headquarters; and [iii] Shri M.S.Gill, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, attached with the DGP, Punjab to consider and redress the grievances of Police Personnel like the petitioners. Since the factual assertions need to be ascertained to resolve the controversy, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a comprehensive representation before the afore- stated Officers'-Committee, who shall then, after affording the petitioners or other officials likely to be affected an opportunity of personal hearing, make appropriate recommendations as early as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. The Officers-Committee shall keep in view all the parameters laid down in Ranjit Singh's case [supra] and shall also take into consideration the order dated 29.1.2010 passed by this Court in CWP No. 4679 of 2009 [Sub Inspector Kuldip Singh v State of Punjab & Ors.] [Annexure P-11] while making the appropriate recommendations. Disposed of. Dasti. March 22, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE