<^ •*'~.-3S--~.^^'»»'.W.-- '•'^ l^ :.^. ^^^ff] IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITJ'ETITiaN N0. ^l!_OF 2006 IN THE MATTER OF: <y ^- & r~ ts c 't- c-1 ^.' ^- PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^l^-y ^^3^-^ ,^^^" '^--"" ' (j;..-- 'ff^." '^ •o^ t» ^^•- t1.lk. '•-" <^ ^ l ^. n'li ''^", '•3.^'"' 6. w h- "" f^.-.s ws^?^^ ••{'' ^'^ -'.J^'^. Suresh Kumar Kaushik aged about 37 years Son ofDr G.P. Kaushik, Resident ofViUage Nagpura, Post Sirgitd, Tahsil Belha, Distdct: BUasput (C.G.) VERSUS 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Through The Secretary General Administtation, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2.. Director General ofPolice, Police Head Quarters, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Departtnent of Honie, / Through: The Secretary, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Board ofProfessionalEducation, /" C-168, Tagore Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 5. Supenntendent ofPoKce, Bilaspur (C.G.) Contd.2 g::.c- c- c. ^,! ISt ^c !^c (2) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/ 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE FURTHER DIRECriONS L ~^s sss HISH COURT OF CHHATTES6ARH AT BILAS'UR Writ Petition No. 6811 pf 2006 Petitioner Suresh Kumar jfaushik Vepais Sjrgte Bench; Hon bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. P.K.C. Tiwari, Senior Advocate with Shri Sewak Ram Rathore, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahu iu, Deputy ©overnmentAdvocate for the OR&ER ;th (Passed on 15T" day of December, 2006) 1. Lesrned counse! appearing for •i4ie petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Siiksha Karmi and joined the post in the year 1998. The petitioner has been working 2. TTie petitioner has not produced a certificote before prescribed date for filing cpplication indicating the period when he hds worked as Shiksha Karmi. The petitioner undertakes to file a certificate to that effect. 3. TTie respondents/authorities are accordingly directed to conslder the certificate, if so produced, for permitting the petitioner to appear in examination, if the petitioner is wwtMXXSISW ^ nd Subhash entitled to gront of 096 relaxation as per circular chted 2 June, 2004. 4. In view of the aforementioned observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to Costs. Certified copy as per ru!es, today. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge