‘ $§ng§a Wrmah IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I—I'ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. I +8 OF 200g / ‘ KqDILIP SINGH RATHORE aged about PETITIONER 6§HMAF 53 years, son of Shri Pratap Singh Rathore, Sub Divisional Officer (Police), Bemetara, Durg (C.G.). 4w ° VERSUS RESPONDENTS : /1/; State of Chahttisgarh, through Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Mantralaya D.K. S. Bhayan, Raipur, (C.G.). 2. Inspector General of Police, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.). Superintendent of Police, S.P. Office, Collectorate, Durg (C.G.). y WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE Era W. :a‘a, @‘rgm’ra, 1W. - v WWWWMMK W200 mwafh aw 31 -01 -2005 . V Shri Kishor Bhaduri, Counsel for the petitioner. Heard on admission. The present petition has bee 1 filed by the petitioner against the show cause notice of Annexure P-1 whereby reversion of the petitioner to the post of :nspector has been Departmenta! Enquiry is going on pendency of the said enquiry the recommendations of the Departmental kept in a sealed envelope and the petition earlier could not be Promotion Committee have been therefore, the promotion given to regularized. Learned counsel for the petiti Enquiry is going on against the ,p conducted on the ground of some road accident occurred on 15-07-2002 conducted on 08—12—2003 i.e. more now the petitioner is proposed to be y of the enquiry. Learned counsel would be served Ef the respondents within a specified period and till than -1 may be kept in abeyance. and the enquiry was ordered to be then one year after the incident and reverted on the ground of pendenc further submits that ends of justice are directed to conciude the enquiry the show cause notice of Annexure P t WWW‘tif’sQtm atmdié‘a proposed on the ground that a against him and because of the oner submits that the Departmental etitioner which was ordered to be 7/, we: we (when GL DRJ—FS/35O—l2/2000—50,000. a WWW "W amw WW m WW, w‘fw, W W? )H A I/ .am’ %W§a§ ............................. ................”m 20g amm (W) Wtemsifefeiéhfagn " ”3:? aéws W Shri Akhi! Agrawal learnél respondents has no objection if tr granted. Under these circumstances and proper if the respondents are Enquiry against the petitioner withir of production of copy of this order Annexure P—‘i should not be given r Ordered accordingly. C.C. as per ruies. Sdl- Dhirendra Mishra Judge «kWKQLE —1 2/2000 50,000. ed panei lawyer appearing for the e aforesaid prayer of the petitioner is l am of the View that it wouid be just :iirected to conclude the Departmental a a period of two months from the date and till then the show cause notice of irrectto. 77L; goon/M .g ewgaei eh