IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO : 597 of 2010 (Criminal Revision case under Section:_______ against the Judgment in No : dated ______ on the file of the Court of the to set-aside the order dt. 16-2-2010 in Crl.MP.No. 597 of 2010 in CC.No.445 of 2008 on the file of the IV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate of Hyderabad, and consequently allow the Crl.R.C., preferred against the order in CC 445 2008 dated ______ on the file of the Court of the ) Between: S.M.Subhan, S/o Tata Saheb, R/o 1-9-1122/D/1, Vidyanagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 MSR Padmakala, D/o Yesuratnam, R/o CRP Section 4th Floor, New Admn., Building High Court, Hyderabad. 2 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.POTTIGARI SRIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following : PSR, J. Crl.R.C.No. 597 of 2010 Judgment This revision case is directed against the order dated:16.02.2010 made by the learned IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad in Crl.M.P.No. 597 of 2010 in C.C.No. 445 of 2008. 2. Heard both sides. 3. Admittedly, the petitioner, as a witness, did not speak, in his evidence, about the presence of the persons, whom he wants to examine on his behalf. Further more, the petitioner’s case would not depend on the evidence of these witnesses to a large extent; but, on the signatures found on the cheques. I see no merits in the revision. 4. The revision case is accordingly dismissed. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. Dated:07.06.2010. *BVS