IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16918 of 2009 1. RATNESH KUMAR MISHRA S/O LATE UMAKANT MISHRA R/O VILL.- SARSI, P.S.- SARSI, DISTT.- PURNEA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE - CUM - COLLECTOR SUPAUL 3. PRABHAT SHANKER, DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER - CUM - ENQUIRING OFFICER null SUPAUL 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE - CUM - COLLECTOR PURNEA 5. THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER PURNEA 6. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER DHAMDAHA, PURNEA 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER RAGHOPUR, SUPAUL ----------- 2. 01.02.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. A preliminary objection is raised on behalf of the State with regard to alternative remedy of Appeal under Rule 23 of the Bihar C.C.A. Rules 2005. Learned Counsel for the petitioner alleges grave procedural irregularities in the conduct of departmental proceedings itself. If the petitioner files an appeal within a period of thirty days from today let the same be decided in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order including the issue of procedural irregularities as alleged or any other issue that may be raised on behalf of the petitioner, without going into the issue of limitation within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed off. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)