FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 79 OF 2011 [Shivshankar Shambhuling Kumbhar and Ors. V/S. The State of Maharashtra and anr.] __________________________________________________________________________ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders __________________________________________________________________________ Mr. V.V. Purwant, adv.for applicant. Mr. P.S. Hingorani, APP for State-respondent 1. Mr. Vikrant Phatate,adv.for respondent no.2. CORAM :- Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. 3 February, 2011. P.C. :- 1. This is an application filed under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code for quashing of the FIR dated 16th December, 2010 registered with Akkalkot Police Station vide C.R. No. 115 of 2010 for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 436, 511, 323 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code. The complaint was filed at the instance of respondent no.2. Applicant no.1 is her husband and applicants no.2 and 3 are her parents-in-law. Today, applicant no.1 and respondent no.2 who are present before the Court state that they have amicably resolved all the differences between the two in mediation by the elderly relatives of both the families. Respondent no.2 has filed an affidavit stating that she has also started residing with the applicants alongwith her daughter and there has been no untoward incidents since then. She states that she does not desire to continue the criminal proceedings initiated by her as it would damage her relations with the applicants. The affidavit filed by respondent no.2 is taken on file. I am satisfied that the dispute in the FIR is the dispute relating only to the applicants and respondent no. 2. In view of the settlement arrived at, no fruitful purpose will be served by continuing with the complaint. Hence, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). [JUDGE]