IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH AUGUST 2008 / 15TH SRAVANA 1930 RP.No. 841 of 2008() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.11848/2005 Dated 24/06/2008 .................... REV. PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: ----------------- PICHAKATHIL SREEDHARAN NAIR S/O.NARAYANI @ KUTTIMALU AMMA RESIDING AT PICHAKATHIL HOUSE POST THRIPANKODE, MALAPPURAM BY ADV. SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT CIVIL STATION, CALICUT 2. PICHAKATHIL SANKUNNI NAIR, S/O.PARVATHI @ CHINNAMMA AMMA, R/AT.PICHAKATHIL HOUSE POST THRIPANKODE MALAPPURAM 3. THRIPANKODE DEVASWOM REP. BY ITS TRUSTEE, ZZMORIAN RAJA POST CHALAPPURAM , CALICUT. R1 BY G.P. SMT.SMITHA SUKUMARAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. .................................................................... R.P. No.841 of 2008 in W.P.(C) No.11848 of 2005 .................................................................... Dated this the 6th day of August, 2008. ORDER Ramachandran Nair, J. Review Petition is filed on the ground that the second respondent has oozing Filaria and therefore, if he is permitted in the temple, it will cause discomfort to devotees and others. We are sure the hereditary trustee managing the temple will take into account this contention of the petitioner while considering the claim of the second respondent. The hereditary trustee will ensure that employees of the temple maintain hygiene in the temple and if they have any problem which causes discomfort to devotees or affects the hygiene of the temple, such employee should be kept out of duty during such period. We do not find any ground to order medical examination of the second respondent because second respondent is admittedly a Filaria patient. So far as Ext.P1(produced in the W.P.(C)) representation filed by the petitioner which is pending before the first respondent is concerned, there will be direction to the first respondent to hear the petitioner and second respondent and pass orders within two 2 months from date of production of copy of this judgment. The Review Petition is disposed of as above. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge V.K.MOHANAN Judge pms