1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA NOS.4079/2008; 4080/2008 IN FA ST NO.1255/2003; CA NOS.4083/2008 4084/2008 IN FA ST NO.1260/2008; CA NOS.4085/2008; 4086/2008 IN FA ST NO.1249/2003; CA NOS.4087/2008; 4088/2008 IN FA ST NO.1265/2003. Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court s’ Orders or directions and Court’s or Judge’s Order Registrar s Orders.. ’ CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 22nd JUNE, 2009 --- P.C.:- 1) Heard Mr.Dande, Counsel for the appellant. 2) The acquiring body feels aggrieved by the enhancement in the land acquisition matters. The Counsel by purshis has informed, in similarly placed matters, namely FA No. 922/2003; 923/2003 and 1192/2003, this Court has condoned delay of 1349 days in causing to file the appeal and the appeals are admitted. The Counsel also informs that the Judgment of the Reference Court, granting enhancement of Rs. 3,200/- per Guntha is set aside in FA Nos. 285/2003; 286/2003 and 2 287/2003 and the lands acquired are also from village Khanapur and under the same Notification. 3) The delay of 1349 days in the group of matters though is exorbitant, but since the acquiring body was crippled in the situation which was beyond its control and the acquiring body feels aggrieved by the so-called excessive enhancement, which also needs consideration, the delay in question is condoned in respective matters. The applications for condonation of delay are disposed of as above. 4) Respective stay applications are not pressed as in most of the matters, the acquiring body/appellant has deposited the amount before the learned Reference Court. CA for stay in respective matters disposed of as not pressed. 5) In spite of notice, respective claimants are absent. Notice in appeal, returnable on 16th December, 2009. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/bdv/ca4079.08