1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI.APPLICATION NO.3957 OF 2008 (BHUPENDRA ANGADHWAJ PAWANKE.. ..Vs.. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri A.V.Bhide, Advocate for Applicant. Shri K.S. Dhote, A.P.P. for Respondent/ State. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : DECEMBER 05, 2008. 1. The applicant, who has been arrested for participating in a gang rape, seeks his enlargement on bail on the ground that other two miscreants had been admitted to bail. The learned Sessions Judge while admitting other two miscreants had observed that none had seen them coming out of the place where the alleged rape was committed, whereas, the applicant was seen coming out of the place, followed by the victim. Further, there is an injury to the applicant's penis. 2. In view of this, it cannot be said that the case of two persons, who have been released on bail, was same as that of the applicant. 3. The application is, therefore, rejected. 2 4. The learned trial Judge would obviously make an endeavour to dispose of the case as early as possible, considering that the applicant is in jail. JUDGE RR.