1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION S. NO.324/2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.130/1997 Dattopant s/o Ramrao Nerkar ...Versus... Purushottam s/o Ramrao Nerkar and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. [Shri A.M. Pannase, Adv. for applicant] CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 30.06.2011. Heard. Having heard learned Counsel for the applicant and having gone through the contents of the application, I find that good and sufficient grounds exist for condoning the delay. Hence, delay is condoned. Civil Application is allowed. Civil Application stands disposed of. CIVIL APPLICATION S. NO.325/2009 Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Abatement is set aside. Civil Application stands disposed of. 2 CIVIL APPLICATION S. NO.326/2009 Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Amendment to be carried out. Civil Application stands disposed of. SECOND APPEAL NO.130/1997 Stand over to 28.07.2011 for taking steps for remaining respondents. JUDGE ssw