IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 13519 of 1995 Between: Ch.V.V.Subba Rao S/o.Nageswara Rao R/o.Yamcha Navipet Mandal Nizamabad District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Divisional Forest Officer Nizamabad Nizamabad District (dismissed for default vide court order dt.11-7-2000) 2 The Superintending Engineer Panchayat Raj Circle Nizamabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in seizing the vehicles of the petitioners, bearing Nos.A.P.IST.9007,ADQ.3452 and AAT-2255 and the issuance of the show cause Notice dated 22-6-1995 is arbitrary, contrary to law illegal and unsustainable and consequently direct the 1st Respondent not to interfere with his contract work and to release the vehicles of the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.R.C.MISHRA Counsel for the Respondent s: GP FOR FORESTS The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.13519 OF 1995 ORDER: It is submitted by Mr.Deepak Mishra, counsel representing R.C.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject matter in the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 23.12.2004. mdaa. Copy to: 1 The Divisional Forest Officer Nizamabad Nizamabad District (dismissed for default vide court order dt.11-7-2000) 2 The Superintending Engineer Panchayat Raj Circle Nizamabad. 3. Two C.Cs to G.P.for Forests High Court of A.P.,Hyderabad.(OUT) 4. two C.D copies.