1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.22 OF 2001 Airports Kamgar Union Mumbai. Petitioner vs. 1. Airport Authority of India & ors. Respondents Mr.Bhavesh Parmar for the petitioner. Mr.S.K.Talsania, Sr.Advocate i/b.M/s.Bhaishankar Kanga & Girdharlal for respondent no.1. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED : 14th December, 2006 P.C. The issue which arises in this petition is similar to which has arisen in Writ Petition No.21/2001. For the reasons set out therein, Rule is discharged. 2. Considering the decision communicated to the petitioners by the Appropriate Government by letter dated 4th August, 2004, it will be open to the petitioners to forward a copy of this order to the Appropriate Government and for the same reasons given by us while disposing of Writ Petition No.21/2001 today, the Appropriate Government within two weeks of the petitioners forwarding a copy of this order to take a decision and communicate the same to the petitioners within six weeks thereafter. 2 3. As the workmen were protected till date, the interim order granted by this court to continue for a further period of three months from today. 4. With the above observations, Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) ( ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. ) ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. ) ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. )