IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10460 OF 2009 Basavraj Sharnappa Moygi ..... ..... ...Petitioner V/s Rameshwaralal Jagannath Karwa..... ..... ...Respondent. Mr.Pankaj J. Das, Adv. for the petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 15th December, 2009. PC: Perusal of the impugned order reveals that the trial court has refused to appoint court commissioner for inspection of the suit property as the trial court was of the view that the petitioner is trying to collect evidence. It is also observed in the impugned order that the landlord is entitled to have inspection of the premises under section 28 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act and hence if the petitioner is desirous to have inspection with a view to collect certain information the petitioner ought to move application under said provision. So observing application for appointment of commissioner is rejected. Perused the order. Same does not call for any interference. Hence writ petition stands dismissed. However it is made clear that it shall be open for the petitioner to take up proper proceeding under section 28 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act. 15.12.2009.