IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : February 25, 2009 1. Criminal Misc. -M No. 25454 of 2008 (O&M) Balbir Singh versus State of Punjab 2. Criminal Misc. -M No. 882 of 2009 (O&M) Kuldip Singh versus State of Punjab Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pritam Pal Present : Mr. BS Baath, Advocate for Balbir Singh petitioner Mr. Sarabjit Singh, Advocate for Kuldip Singh petitioner Mr. KD Sachdeva, DAG Punjab Mr. BS Guliani, Advocate for the complainant Pritam Pal,J. (Oral) Petitioners have brought the aforesaid petitions under section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure for seeking anticipatory bail in one and the same FIR No. 77 dated 13.7.2008 under sections 307, 392, 452, 148, 149 IPC registered at Police Station Sadar Mehta District Amritsar. Therefore, they are being disposed of by this common order. Both the petitioners were granted interim anticipatory bail by this Court vide orders dated 1.10.2008 and 21.1.2009. As stated by learned State counsel both of them have already joined the investigation and nothing remains to be recovered from any of the petitioners. Mr. Guliani, learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the aforesaid bail matter on the ground that Hon'ble the Supreme Court has dismissed the SLP filed by co-accused seeking anticipatory bail who was having dang at the time of occurrence. Against this, learned counsel for the Criminal Misc. -M No. 25454 of 2008 (O&M) -2- petitioners had made reference to the injuries mentioned in Annexure P/2, alleged to have been caused by Balbir Singh petitioner. The doctor described these injuries as under :- “X-ray Skull – APP ) No Bony injury seen. “ Skull Lt. Lat. ) X-ray Rt. Leg - Aplateral : Two superficial cuts seen in anterior cortex of Tibia suggestive of hesitation cuts indicating fabrication. Sd/- Dr. “ To other petitioner namely Kuldip Singh, admittedly no injury is attributed. Thus, taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances, orders dated 1.10.2008 and 21.1.2009 whereby interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners by this Court, are made absolute. Both the Criminal Misc. petitions stands disposed of. ( Pritam Pal ) February 25 2009 Judge 'dalbir'