/'/l/'-,^ HfGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR W.P. ('S) No. 4440 of 2005 >°etjtioner Dr. V. R. Meshram, S/o Shri U,. L. Meshram, age 50 years, Senlor Medsca! Officer, District Hospita!, Durg Versus o ^I/>t»ft+ "4 Kesponaent "s. Secretan/. State of Chhattisgarh, PubKc Heaith and Famiiy Weiiare & Medica! Educat'on Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Rajpur (C. G.). Dr. A, P. Sawant, Medfea! Officer, DistrictHospita!, Durg (C.G.) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. AgnihoSri, J fiione for the petiBoner. Shrt Sushi' Dubey, Govt. Advocats for She rsspondents nb nc D \/ r^ i-f c. r\ (Passed on this 28 day of Msrch, 2007) The foitowins order of the Court js passed by Sstish K. Agnihofri, J. 1. The psSitioner has fited this petition cha!tenging fhe Sransfer order dated 6.12.2001. By virtue of ttie interim stay granted by ths Madhya Prsdesh Admlnisfrative Tribunai af Raipur te petiSoner is confinuing at the originai piace of posting. ??d f'Haf' -s-c *^ s¥»-£l.f*fi"?K 'lift^ n'Sfiiri-sifvs. fif *CFS^A f'HiG ?^^sf'''frirt?' l?i/s& i'&?i^;.s¥ta Si? ili^ii, ciS? ii iti«yj Wiifi iU%; paS?S?<5y^ yi Uific iiiiS? p^Uliyij fia^ US^ryiji^ infrucSuous as period of transfer is not appiicabte forsver. AS Shis point of ti'me there is no question to exasnine frse vaiidity of the transfer order. However, the respondente are at liberty to pass appropriate orders kesping in view the pubi'ic jRterest and administrative exigency, •A'ithout inslsSng on compiiaRce ofths impugned fransfer order. S. !n view of She above, this petition stands disposed of. No ordsr as to 3. !n costs.