&wmr wvs. C^lffQ <" ® f IN THE IBGH C013ST CHHATTISGASya AT BILASPUR W.P. (s) No. .'^.?:^......../208<'7- ..-^ PETITIONER ,:---^-- Dfaat Singfa Sontwu S/o Shn Sirdar i)^f./' (\Kf^y .:••-!>/?• unai Bmgn isoH^rom s/o (..-f^''' /'/' Smgh Soawmi aged aboat 39 years, ^Mt9/ ^S^ri'SSn^JS ^'^^y' AssBtasnt - Teacfaer Govt. Prmiary Scfaool Khairi, Block Dongargon Distt. Eajnan^aon (C.G.) ,<;-\y .^•' V_ERSUS A-'- ^SPONDENTS: 1. ^Stsits ef Chfaattisgarh Throagh Secretaiy Depa-tfflent of Edueation Maatralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur .^^1, ^l ^IP'^'I ^ l1' <-^' District Bducatioti Officeir, CMlfiria, , ^V^ District Rajnandgaoa (C.G.) 3. Block Education OIBcer Block - Chhuria District — Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRITPETITIONU/A 2^6/277 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN TBGE NATURE OF MANBAMUS ANO CERTIORARI AND SHTABLEWmTSASS&DIRECTIQNS The above named petitioner most faumbly and respectfuUy begs to submitas imder:- ^ HI6H COURT OF CHHAmS6ARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PFTmONfS.1 N0. 464 OF 2007 Petittoner Resoondents versys Hemroi Kumbhkar State of Chhatt'isgarh and others WRTT PFTmON (S.) N0 465 OF 2007 Petitioner Reaondents versus Siddharth Choure State of Chhattisgarh ond o'thers WRTT PFTmON (5.) N0. 466 OF 2007 Petitjoner Respondents versys PcBich Rnm 5ahu State of Chhatl-isgorh and others WRIT PFTTTION (S.l N0. 467 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Manharan Lal Pithaura State of Chhottisgarh and oltiers WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0. 468 OF 2007 Petitioner ResBondents versus Yaggaya Datt'a Baghel Stute of ChhaM'isgarh and o-Hiers WRTT PETmON (S.l N0 469 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Shila Khaperdoy State of Chhattisgarh and others ^t) tf-'- WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 470 OF 2007 Petitioner yersys Resoondents Radhey Kishun Patel Stale of Chhutl-isgarh and o-thers Petitioner WRTT PETTTtON (S.) N0. 471 OF 2007 AtongonLul versus ftiespondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh ond others WRTT PFHTION (S.) N0. 472 OF 2007 Petitmner Resoondents yersus Dhal Singh Sonwani State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETTTION (S.) N0. 473 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents Onkar Loil Sonboir State of Chhattisgarh ond olhers WRTT PETTTEON (5.1 N0. 474 OF 2007 Petitioner : Shiv Kumar Sharma versus Respondents : State of Chhffttisgarh and others WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 47B OF 2007 Petitioner : Rajendro Kumar Sa9ar versus Resoondents : S+ate of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETmON (S.) N0. 476 OF 2007 Petitioner Makhanlal Thakur versus Re^»ondents : S'tate of Chhattisgarh cnd o-thers WRIT PETTraON (S.)NO. 477 OF 2007 Petitioner verws Respondents Fool Chand Knmleshwar State of Chhattisgarh and o'thers WRTT PETmON (5.1 N0. 478 OF 2007 Petittoner yerais Respondents Rajendro Kumar Dewan9on State of Chhatt'isgarh ond o-thers And WRIT PETmON IS.) N0. 479 OF 2007 Petitioner Resooncksnts versus Joyant Kumar Shendey State of Chhatt'isgarh and others Present : Mr. R.K. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petittoners. Mr. Sudiil Dubey, ©ovemment Adwcate for the S'tate/reapondents. OftDER (Passed on 24th Day of Jonuary, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel oppearing for the petitioners as v»ell as leamed fiovemment Advocate appearmg for the State/reqiondents jointly submit that -the facts and question of la»»mvolved m the present batch of writ petitions are squarely covered by •the decision of this Court in the case of yoshwant Kumw Sheifwdiw^ v». Munle^al Cai"imwHon. t>wy wid anottM>'. 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (ffapesfi Kumar Vwwava. Ths State Govf. of Chhattisffarh wfd awtlwt) ond o-ther connected nwl-ters. decided by this ,/-~T <? Court on 15-12-2006. pursuont to -the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by Ihe Secretary. Board of Secondary Education. Bhopal and -the prospectus of Diploma in Education Excmination, it wos cku-ified that the nomenclature of the Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been chonged ond renamed ofi Oiploma in Edkication, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, •t+ie D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 {jSofjedi Kumar Vermaw. The State Govt. of Oihsttisyirh aid cvwihei) (5upro). 3. For Ihe aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the motter of Ya^iwait Kumar fifran»flti«/(Supm), subject' to verification of the fact as to whe-ther the petitioners have acquired B.T.L/D.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circubrs dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whe'ther they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of this order be placed on the record of -the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006C[I) PJR-C696 Thakur