IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.393 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Raghubir Sain Mittal @ Bablu, S/o Sri Dhani Ram Mittal. 2. Vineet Mittal S/o Sri Har Gopal Mittal. 3. Gaurav Mittal S/o Sri Har Gopal Mittal, All R/o State Bank Colony, Adhoiwala, Police Station Raipur, Dehradun, District Dehradun. …………. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Secretary (Home), Civil Secretariat, Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 2. Station House Officer, Police Station Raipur, District Dehradun. 3. Jai Prakash Shukla S/o Late Sri Ram Kripal Shukla, R/o State Bank Colony, Adhoiwala, Police Station Raipur, Dehradun. ………….. Respondents ………… Sri Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri H.C.Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent no.3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Sri Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri H.C.Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent no.3. 2. Sri Pande, the learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners Raghubir Sain Mittal, Vineet Mittal and Gaurav Mittal seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them now has become infructuous as the police after the completion of the investigation has filed charge-sheet against the petitioners before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 10.04.2006 stands vacated automatically. 5. With the above order, CLMA No. 4119 of 2006 also stands disposed of. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 06.07.2006 06.07.2006 A