1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3577 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.3878 OF 1997 Shrinivas Raghuvir Kambli .. Plaintiff Versus Smt.Rajashree Raghuvir Kambli and Ors. .. Defendants Mr.A.J.Almeida for plaintiff Mr.N.V.Bhutekar for defendant Nos. 4 and 5 Mr.N.Dinkar Rao for defendant Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 16th October 2008 P.C. . The first defendant who is contesting party has pointed out that the society maintenance and outgoings are being duly paid by defendant No.1. Defendant No.1 is also liable and, therefore, paying repair charges/contribution. 2 2. The flat is in a cooperative society and the Advocate for defendant No.1 states that the defendant No.1 is in possession of the said flat and has not inducted anybody else in possession nor has parted with possession of the said flat. The flat is not being transferred, alienated, encumbered either. In such circumstances and when the defendant No.1 is ready and willing so also undertakes before this Court to pay society and Municipal charges/ outgoings so also Repair charges, it is not necessary to grant any prayers in the motion. 3. By consent respondent Nos.1 and 2 who are parties with whom monies are lying should take steps to reinvest the deposited money for such further period as is permissible under the relevant schemes. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to act on an authenticated copy of this order. Liberty to apply. Motion disposed of. 3 (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)