IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5698 of 2011 BIRENDRA MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.04.2011 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner being husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 494, 323, 341, 406 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned Counsel for the petitioner on instruction submits that the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour and has also filed restitution case. Considering the aforesaid stand, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender, be released on bail provisionally for a period of six months on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Mukesh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, lst Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 409 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Let the learned court below issue notice to the complainant and on her appearance the petitioner will take her back to her matrimonial home and keep her as wife with full dignity. The provisional anticipatory bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by the learned court below on two eventualities i.e. either on restoration of matrimonial harmony substantially or the complainant refuses to reside with the petitioner. Snkumar/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)