IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 2156 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 26.11.2011. Rajesh Kumar --Appellant Versus State of Haryana & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:- Mr. Ravi Partap Singh, Advocate for the appellant. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) C.M. No. 5813 of 2011 Application is allowed. Delay of 45 days in filing the appeal is condoned. L.P.A. No. 2156 of 2011 This appeal has been filed against the judgement dated 9.9.2011, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant herein has been disposed of having been covered by the judgement of this Court dated 5.8.2011 passed in CWP No. 4587 of 2011 titled as Naresh Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & others. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has pointed out that the prayer in the writ petition was for setting aside the appointment of some of the guest teachers with a further prayer for appointment of the appellant herein, however, learned Single Judge treating the claim of the appellant as against the termination disposed of the writ petition. We have carefully examined the copy of the writ petition placed on record. We are of the opinion that the prayer of the appellant has LPA No. 2156 of 2011 -2- not been taken into consideration. There is error apparent on the face of the record. Under these circumstances, the best remedy available to the appellant is to approach the learned Single Judge with a review application. In this view of the matter, learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file a review application. Prayer allowed. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. In view of the pendency of the appeal, learned Single Judge will sympathetically consider the question of condonation of delay, if, any in filing the review application. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE (TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA) JUDGE 26.11.2011. lucky