CSA 757/03 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.757/03 Hari Shankar Versus Deen Dayal & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 29/01/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. L.L. Gupta, for appellant Mr. M.M. Ranjan, for respondents *** Instant second appeal has been filed by plaintiff-appellant assailing judgment & decree of the courts below where concurrent finding has been recorded against him and the suit at both the stages was dismissed. Plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendant for restraining him from creating any obstruction on the passage which is in between chowk and pole of House No.3129, Chowkri Purani Basti, Bagroo Walon Ka Rasta, Jaipur. Learned trial Judge in all framed six issues and after taking into consideration the evidence and material came on record, dismissed the suit for injunction filed by appellant-plaintiff and the court of appeal also affirmed the finding of learned trial Judge while dimissing the appeal preferred by appellant vide judgment and decree dated 11th August, 2003. CSA 757/03 [2] I have heard counsel for appellant and so also counsel for respondents as well, who appears to be caveator. Submission made is only with regard to re- appreciation of evidence and both the courts below have concurrently decided against the appellant-plaintiff. This court does not find any substantial question of law which emerge for consideration in the instant appeal. Consequently, the appeal fails and is hereby dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA,JR.P.A.757CSA2003 29-1.doc