IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2008 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 8304 of 2008(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ MATHEW M. DANIEL, H.S.A.[MATHS], M.G.M.HIGH SCHOOL, ENGAPUZHA, PUDUPPADI, KOZHIKODE DIST. PARMANENT ADDRESS- MULLAMTHANATHU [H],PANNIVISHA, ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA -691 523. BY ADV. SRI.P.J.MATHEW RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE MANAGER, CATHOLICATE & MD SCHOOLS, [CORPORATE MANAGEMENT], DEVALOKAM, KOTTAYAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.8304 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a HSA (Maths) working in the 3rd respondent's school. Apparently he desires a transfer to one of the schools of the educational agency in Kollam District. He contends that going by Exts.P5 and P6 Government orders, the petitioner is eligible to be appointed as HSA (English) in one of the schools under the 3rd respondent's educational agency in which case he would get a posting in Kollam or Pathanamthitta District. The petitioner has filed Ext.P7 representation before the 2nd respondent in this regard. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P7 expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Government pleader also. In view of the facts disclosed in the writ petition, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P7 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from W.P.(c) No.8304/08 2 the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the 3rd respondent . The petitioner shall forward a certified copy of the judgment along with a copy of this writ petition to the 2nd respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd W.P.(c) No.8304/08 3