IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5764/2004 Anchi Devi W/o late Shri Umrao Lal Yadav Versus The State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 08.04.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri R.P. Singh, Counsel for petitioner Shri M.C. Gupta, Addl. Govt. Counsel for respondents #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition with the prayer that the respondents No.2 and 3 may be directed to regularize 1.90 hectare land in northern side of Khasra No.1126 and 0.58 hectare land in western side of Khasra No.1127. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner is in possession of the disputed land she moved an application before the concerned authority to regularize the same. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Viratnagar, vide its letter dated 30th October, 2001 (Annexure-11) sought report from Patwari Halka, Jawanpura, and a report was submitted by Patwari on 30th December, 2001 but still the case of the petitioner for regularization of her land has not been considered so far. The learned Additional Government Counsel submits that the petitioner may be directed to file a representation afresh before the competent authority for regularization of land and a direction may be given to consider the same in accordance with the Circular dated 1st April, 1991 (Schedule-I) and in accordance with the law. I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties and, after considering their submissions, I think it fit and proper to direct the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the concerned authorities for regularization of disputed land in her name within a period of one month from today and in case the said representation is filed then the concerned authorities will consider the same in accordance with the Circular/order dated 1st April, 1991 (Schedule-I) and in accordance with the law. In case the representation is filed within a period of one month then the respondents will consider the case of the petitioner within a period of three months thereafter and till then the interim stay order dated 23rd August, 2004 passed by this court maintaining the status-quo in respect of the disputed land shall be maintained. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Cost is made easy. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman// IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Misc. Stay Application No.4935/2004 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5764/2004 Anchi Devi W/o late Shri Umrao Lal Yadav Versus The State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 08.04.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri R.P. Singh, Counsel for petitioner Shri M.C. Gupta, Addl. Govt. Counsel for respondents #### By the Court:- In view of the order passed in the writ petition itself, the stay application, filed therewith, also stands disposed of. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//