MM 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHAITISGARH) w.p. (S) No. ?C%L /2011 A. R. Choukiker, S/o. Late Fattoo Chaukiker, aged about 5’8 years, R/o. Near‘ Sai Manglik Bhawan, Vidhut Nagar, Durg (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS / (1) State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Department of Finance‘85 Scheme, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS Commissioner; " Small Saving and State Lotteries, Anand Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) (3)/birector, Office of Directorate, Small Saving and State Lotteries, Raipur (C.G.) /. (4) Collector, Distt. Durg (C.G.) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA wl W HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTECE PRITINKER DIWAKER W.P.£S).NO. 7531 1201 1 PETITIONER A. R.Choukiker RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh &s Others Shr‘i Vinod Deshmukh, counsel for ths petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, P.L. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA oRnER (13.12.2011) Gn‘evance of the petitioner in the present petition is that thou gh he is entitled for the time bound pay scale but the same has not been granted to him. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already made representations (Annexures P/8 8s 10) and the purpose of filing this petition would be served if’ direction is issued to the respondent N02 to decide the pending representations ‘of the petitioner. State counsel submits that let the petitioner make a fresh representation to the respondent N02 along with copy of the earlier representation and in turn his representation would be decided in accordance with law subject to the eligibility of the petitioner. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to file a fresh representation along with copy of the earlier representation within a period of three weeks and in turn the same would be decided by the respondent N02 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably Within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with lair/WV/l‘ Sd/- Pritinker DiWaker Judge