1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.984 of 2006 IN SUIT NO.2133 OF 1982 Shantikumar Hansraj & Ors. ..Plaintiffs. Vs. Sarla Sardchandra Sampat & Ors. ..Defendants. ... Mr. Kamat Katta i/b Vimadalal & Co. for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Dipen Merchant for Defendants 3(a) and 3(c). Ms. Daksha Shah for Defendants 3(b), 4(a), 10, 11 and 12. Mr. Kapil Gor for Defendants 5 and 13. Mr. S.R. A. Shaikh for Defendants 7(a), 7(b) and 17. Mr. Amit Potnis with Gunjan Nandu i/b Tamhane & Co. for Defendants 13, 19 and 20. Ms. K.A. Shah for Defendants 14 to 16, 18 and 21. ... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 27th November, 2006. P.C. : The Chamber Summons has been served. All the contesting parties are before the Court. Hence by consent the Chamber Summons is taken on Board. The Sixth Defendant has expired. Defendants 18, 19, 20 and 21 are his legal heirs and representatives who are already on the record. The Chamber Summons is in the circumstances made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). However, counsel appearing for the Plaintiffs 2 seeks an amendment only in respect of items A, D (except the bracketed portion) and E of the Schedule to the Chamber Summons. The Chamber Summons shall accordingly be made absolute in respect of items A, D (except the bracketed portion) and E of the Schedule. Amendment to be carried out within four weeks. Suit to be placed on 7th December, 2006.