IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2386 of 2009 ARCHANA SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 20/2/2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The remedy of the petitioner against an order of termination of her service as also subjecting her to recovery of the entire amount drawn by her pursuant to her earlier appointment and working, in view of provisions made by the State Government for adjudication of such dispute is before the District Appellate Tribunal. This Court therefore for the first time will not interfere with the impugned order and would give liberty to the petitioner to approach the Tribunal. In the event the petitioner approaches the Tribunal within a period of fifteen days from today, the Tribunal shall not only make all its endeavor to dispose of the case of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of such filing of application by the petitioner, but would also consider the desirability of staying 2 the operation of the impugned order, in as much as, the petitioner is still working as also she has been subjected to recovery of the amount of salary drawn by her without giving an opportunity of hearing in view of principles laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Bijay Kumar Bharti Vs. State of Bihar & Ors, reported in 1983 PLJR 667. With the aforementioned observation and direction this application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar