1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 43 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 43 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 43 OF 2008 Ashish Memchandra Manjrekar. .. Petitioner. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents. Ms. Kranti S. Anand for Petitioner. Mrs.A.A. Mane, APP., for the State. Mr. C.K. Pandse i/by Mr. M.S. Mohite for Respondent No. 2. CORAM: SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM: SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM: SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE : 30TH APRIL, 2008. DATE : 30TH APRIL, 2008. DATE : 30TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. . This petition has been filed to challenge the order passed by the Sessions Court dated 16.6.2007 refusing to return the property to the accused. An application has been filed by the petitioner-accused before the Metropolitan Magistrate Railway Mobile Court, Andheri in the Complaint Case pending against him for return of property. The learned Magistrate rejected that application as it was felt that evidence would be required to ascertain whether the flat was purchased from the funds which were allegedly siphoned 2 off by the petitioner from the U.T. World Wide India Pvt. Ltd. The Sessions Court has confirmed the view taken by the learned Magistrate. On perusing the orders passed by both the Courts below, I do not find any illegality in those orders requiring interference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. These orders cannot be termed as erroneous and they do not disclose any error apparent on the face of the record. The petition is, therefore, rejected. (Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.) (Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.) (Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.)