^ps^ '15-^) !N_:mEHiGHCQUm'gFCH^H^^^^ ^ Writ Petition No. 2302 of 2004 Petitioner Hirdayaaand Tiwad, aged about 36 years, S/o Shri Nageshwar Tiwad, R/o Namnakaia, Ambikapui', District Surguja (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Trasisport, D.K,S. Bhawan, Maatralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) State Traasport AppeUate Tribunal, 25 College Road, Choubey Colony, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) State Traasport Aufhority E,A.C, Colony, behind CoUectorate, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Shri Prakash Gupta, S/o Late Bhuneshwar Prasad Gupta, R/o ViUage Tapkara, Kunkuri, Distdct Jashpur (Chhattisgarlx) 2. 3. 4. WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Stui Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri Vanin Sahraina, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri Viaay Harit, Depuly Advocate General for the respondent No.l. OK DEK (Passed on fhis 8th Day of September, 2008) Learaed counsel appearing tbr fhe petitioner, on iastructioiis, subuiits that fhe petitioner seeks to wifhidraw fhis petition, as fhis petition has becoicie infructuous. Learo.ed couusel appearing for the respondent/State has no objection. In view of the above, the petition ^ dismissed as withdrawn, as haviag becoxne iniructuous. Consequenfly, M(W)P No. 2050/2004 for iaterim reMefalso stands disixussed. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge