¥;;ii-IKlE SEN^I <lff- \^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH_A]_BILASPUR (C.G.} WRIT PETITION FS^ NQ. ^52- QF 2010 PETITIONER: /^/ .fe^./" ^My ^AV' ^^ ^^,. ^^ ^i1 RESPONDENTS : ^ r". Dr. Dinesh Singh Nandanvan, s/o S.S. Nandanvan, aged about 59 years, Ayurveda Chikitsa Adhikari, Munidpal Corporation Raipur, (C.G.), R/o Near Ravishanker Stadium, Kota Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Urban Administration, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Municipal Corporation Raipur, through Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950, FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, ETC. AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. XI-HC—78 3^?r^T'Rnt^ TCT371^T^RW Praveen *fl^fSl (ft^flW 'T^ ^l^M^r, y>Ti1'M4i<o, [sKrii'yy ..^:...^..^^ 200 ^TI^T T^W ( yf^<i^) ^fW[^f?Tf3iT^r Hosi?ble Sh?i Mai&isidra Mohaii Shri^astava, J. 9.8.2010 Shri Alok Bakshi, couns Sxnt. Sniita Ghai, Paael Leamed counsel for the ^)l^t<n^1tl 'RTR^ff ^ fe^ <psi^3< ^3ffiw3:ni^T ^l for tlie petitioner. ^awyer for the State, on advaiice copy, jpetitioner submits fhat even though fhe Corporation has resolved to e^ihaace the age of retirenient from 60 to 62 years aad proposal to t]jiat effect has been sent to the State Govemment on 2.6.2008, the wifh regard to fhe age of Corporation. What should be the exclusive doiaam of consider4 Rule Makiag Aufhority. No s^ Goverament has not taken aay decision superaanuation, as proposed by the ^ervice conditions of eraployee is aii ttion of fhe Apponitmg Autiiority & the ?ecific direction could be issued by this Court to coinmand respondenfs to fbc aay particular age of retiremLent. However, takiag iato conside^ation that fhe Corporation has already proposed enhaacenient ofthe| 2008, it would be appropriatd age of retirenient, way back ia fhe year to direct respondent No. 1 to consider the niatter aad take decision ob tfae same ia accordan.ee wiUi law. Witli tlie aforesaid obse^ations, petition is fiaally disposed ojff. Sd/- ManindraMohanShrivastava