HIQH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION B6NCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEVGUFTA, ©J& HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. APPELLANT PETITIONER RESPONDENTS: Writ Apoeal No. 83 of2007 Tek Chand Agrav^l S/o Nand Kjshore Agrawa! aged aboift 73 years Occupation Businessman R/o Near Janki Dharmshala, Kharsia Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhatttsgaiti, Through its Secretary Ministry of Town Administration and Development, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Town AdminlstratiCNn and Development Departmert Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Munteipat OfHcer Nagar Palika Parisad Kharsia District Raiaarh (C.G.) AB&eaLyndeLSection 2(1) of the Chhattisaarh Hiah Court (ADDeal to DMston Bench) Act 2006 aaainst order dated 20'" dav of Februarv. 2007 oassed bv Hon'bie Shri S.K. Aanihotri J. in W.P. fC) No. 277/2007 Present: Shri Uttam Pandey, learned counsel for the a{^Detlant. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additional Advocate Qeneral for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. JUDGMENT (05BI February, 2008) The following judgment of the Court was passed by Raj^ev Guptay C.J. Shri Uttam Pandey, learned counset for the appetlant sufcynits ttiat appellant - Tek Chand Agrawal has expired during the pendenc^ of the appeat. (2) In view of the above development, learned ccxjnset tor the appetlant seeks permission to withdraw the writ appeal with tiberty oftaking rec©urseto the remedies which may be availabte for the proteotion of survhflng Interest of the appellant. (3) Permission granted. (4) With the above liberty, the writ appeal is dlsmi^ed as witlxlrawn. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Subbu ^