IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 28116 of 2008 Between: K. Radya S/o. Jyothiya APSRTC, Musheerabad Depot, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Depot Manager, Musheerbad, A.P.S.R.T.C. Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Manager, Musheerbad, A.P.S.R.T.C. Hyderabad City Region, Jubilee Bus Station, Picket, Secunderabad. 3 The A.P.S.R.T.C. rep. by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned P1/693(4)/2007-MSRD, dt. 21.4.2007 issued by the 1st respondent in retiring the petitioner on medical grounds and set-aside the same as null and void and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently declare that the petitioner is entitled for alternative employment to a suitable post under the provisions of Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.RAMGOPAL RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.MADHAVA REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following : HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.28116 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed challenging the order dated 21.04.2007 passed by the first respondent-A.P. State Road Transport Corporation thereby retiring the petitioner on medical grounds. When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that after filing this writ petition, the Corporation by order dated 23.06.2009 appointed the petitioner as Shramik with immediate effect protecting the wages drawn earlier. In the circumstances, it is represented that no further enquiry is necessary on merits. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 10-08-2009 KLP