IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 3856 of 2009 Date of Decision: 27.7.2009 Smt. Jai Dei ....Petitioner. Versus Smt. Dallo and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Sandeep Jasuja, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. The petitioner-objector is aggrieved against the order dated 28.3.2009 passed by the executing court whereby the objections filed by her have been dismissed. The operative part of the decree which is sought to be executed, reads thus:- “The suit is decreed with cost. A decree for permanent injunction is passed in favour of the plaintiff restraining defendants from encroaching upon and raising construction over the suit property shown in Red colour in the site plan JHFE prepared by Local Commissioner. By way of a decree of mandatory injunction, defendants are directed to vacate the encroached Red portion of khasra no. 410/1.” C.R. No. 3856 of 2009 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute that the petitioner has no concern in relation to the portion of khasra No. 410/1, the execution of which has been sought by the decree-holder. No illegality or perversity could be pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the order dated 28.3.2009 passed by the executing court warranting interference by this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, there is no merit in this revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed. July 27, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE