IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 174 of 2011 Sahin & another ……… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ………. Respondents Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. P.S. Bohra, Brief Holder for the State/respondent nos.1 & 2 Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for respondent No. 3. Date of Judgment : 15.03.2011 JUDGMENT Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. In the First Information Report, there is no allegation of commitment of offence punishable under Section 307 of I.P.C., nor there is any allegation of commitment of offence punishable under Section 436 of I.P.C. The allegation is of attack with certain weapon, but that the attack resulted in injury, as mentioned in Section 307 of I.P.C., has not been stated in the First Information Report. Similarly, there is an allegation of arson to certain household items inside the house, but not arson to the house. In the circumstances, Sections 307 and 436 of I.P.C. are deleted from the First Information Report. It is made clear that these deletions will not stand in the way of the police incorporating the said sections at a later stage of the investigation and filing of challan on the basis thereof. 2. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 15.03.2011 Aswal