IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12208 of 2008 CHANDAN KUMAR GHOND Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 8/ 28.01.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Party no2. The submission on behalf of Opposite Party no.2 was that the petitioner appears to be taking baseless stands only to get the privilege of bail. From the records of the present proceedings, it appears that in a Complaint Case under Section 498A of I.P.C., the petitioner, who is the husband of the Opposite Party no.2, did reconcile their differences to reside together in the matrimonial home but which proved to be short lived. Considering the same, the petitioner was granted provisional bail on 5.01.2009. Learned counsel for the Opposite Party no.2 submits that she was still ready and willing to go back to the matrimonial home. There are no heinous allegations against the petitioner. The provision bail granted to him by the order dated 05.01.2009 in connection with Complaint Case no. 2080 of 2007 pending in the Court of C.J.M., Siwan is hereby confirmed. 2 The submission made on behalf of Opposite Party no.2 is a matter to be appropriately kept in mind and considered by the Magistrate during the course of trial. S.B.P. (Navin Sinha, J.)