1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R D.B. CR. WRIT PETITION (PAROLE) NO. 1980/2008 (Raju @ Rajiya Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of Order : 23/05/2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI By Post. Mr. Vishal Raj Mehta, public prosecutor for the State. BY THE COURT (PER HON'BLE PANWAR,J.) Convict Raju @ Rajiya seeks to release him on parole by a petition sent by him through Superintendent Jail, Jodhpur. A detailed reply has been filed by the respondent State stating therein that there is every likelihood of committing similar nature of offence by the petitioner if he is released on parole during that period and his previous conduct also do not warrant releasing him on parole. A report was sought from the District Superintendent of Police, (City) Jodhpur and as per the report of the District Superintendent of Police (City) Jodhpur, it is 2 reported that if the petitioner is released on parole, the petitioner is likely to commit similar nature of offence and it would be unsafe to his family members as well. By order dated 23.4.2008, public prosecutor was directed to submit the report more particularly the statement of mother of the petitioner. Learned public prosecutor has placed on record the statement of mother of the petitioner duly attested by Superintendent, Central Jail, Jodhpur wherein it has been stated that if the petitioner is released on parole, there is every likelihood that he will commit the similar nature of offence and it would be dangerous to the family members including his wife, children and mother. In this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that releasing the petitioner on parole would not be in the interest of justice. The petition seeking parole is therefore, dismissed. (KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI),J. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp