IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 888 of 2010 Date of Decision: 20.1.2010. Naresh Kumar Sharma --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Ashok Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion to respondents no.1 to 3 only. Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Addl. A.G., Haryana has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the controversy involved in this petition, same is being disposed of at the motion stage itself with the consent of learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner was engaged as a Guest Lecturer in Physics in Govt. Model Sanskriti Sr. Secondary School, Saroli, Block Punhana, District Mewat on 7.7.2008. He was relieved from the engagement on 30.12.2008. The petitioner claims to have approached the District Education Officer, Mewat for his re-engagement in view of the availability of vacancies. It is stated that the State has issued a new policy for re- engagement of the displaced guest teachers. The petitioner has also made a representation (Annexure P-6) for his re-engagement which has not been considered till date. CWP. No. 888 of 2010 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representation of the petitioner. In view of the above circumstances, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.1 to take decision on the representation of the petitioner, referred to above, within a period of two months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 20.1.2010. lucky