C482 No.37/2009 Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. (Compounding/Compromise Appln. No.983/11) Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. P.S. Bohra, Brief Holder for the State/respondent No.1. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the respondent no.2. Heard upon the compromise/ compounding application as well as upon the merits of the main petition. It appears that the bone of contention between Smt. Upasana Tyagi and Pranjal Tyagi is based upon several matrimonial disputes between the two. Each filed different types of litigation at their place of residence against the other. Now, the matter is being settled by way of filing this compromise. Mr. Mool Chand Tyagi, father of Upasana Tyagi as well as Pranjal Tyagi are present personally before the Court, being represented by their respective counsel. So, this compromise is accepted and the C482 petition is disposed of in terms of the conditions stated therein, with the result, the orders of cognizance dated 20.10.2008 and 26.11.2008 passed by the First Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar in criminal case no.1781 of 2008, State Vs. Upasana and others, for the offence of Sections 147, 452, 323 and 506 IPC as well as the chargesheet submitted in case crime no.1781 of 2008, are hereby quashed. Compromise application is allowed accordingly. (Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.) 24.08.2011 Rdang