1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.15838 of 2011 1 R.NESARAJ ABRAHAM 2 ROSE VICTORIA 3 JEBA SELVI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH, TIRUNELVELI. CR. NO.59/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. K.SEKAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 420 and 468 I.P.C in Crime No.59/2011 and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been arrayed as A-1 to A-3 and they have been implicated in this case on the allegation that they are said to have fabricated the sale deed in respect of the property belonging to the de-facto complainant, as early as in the year 2005. He further submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners have been implicated in this case on the allegation that they are said to have fabricated the sale deed in respect of the property belonging to the de-facto complainant. He further submitted that the investigation is pending. 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 5. The fact remains that the petitioners have been implicated in this case in respect of the occurrence said to have been taken place in the year 2005 and further, the entire allegations are borne out by the alleged fabricated document and as such, this Court is of the view that the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required. In view of the same, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police for a period of six weeks daily at 5.30 p.m. and thereafter he shall be available for interrogation as and when required and the second and third petitioners being ladies, they shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TIRUNELVELI. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH,TIRUNELVELI. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. K.SEKAR Advocate SR.No.44403 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15838 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 RJ/21.12.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/