» ^1;@£.— dated....-^"/-'4-"'" 4-; ^tEBBvcH ^^ / -aoJ , IN THE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION (S1 N0. 3 8 6^ ^oog Smt. Fulkunwar Gabel, W/o-Shri Mohan Sin^h Gabel, Aged about 34 years, Presently workpig as Assistant Nurse Made (A.N.M.), Village - Pota.Division- MaUdiaraouda, Distt. Janjgir -Champa, Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh, Through- Secretaiy, Deptt. ofHealth & Family Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETiTiON UNDER ARTiCLE 226/227 O^ THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE QF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI ETC. '</ XI-HC-78 HTH^I ai^lcb s^'qraRra', ®Tnw'is,(sioitiy ^^•^•P^^-fc-^200^ _!__ 3TT^?T 4aw (l?Idq'a.Er) sn^r^rf?1!!?; crara'n^TsPlN; TOITW; gf?(T 3I7^T Wilfeft^ WRff ff felA rfSRZTC ^srf^TTsn^T 7.8.2006:. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, coun|sel forthe petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Go\(t. Advocate for the State, on advance copy. Heard. By the instant petition, the (tetitioner has challenged her transfer order dated 26 June 2006, An^iexure-P/1, whereby she has been JanjgirtoJashpur. titioner is that in her transfer order it is as been transferred on adminisfrative after transfer of the petitioner ther^ pending consideration. in the circumstances, learne<f respondent and he be directed to] counsei for respondent has no objec^ Having heard learned couns^ petitioner is just, fair and reasonabl transferred from Malkharoda, Districtl The main grievance of the pef not mentioned as to whether she h^ ground. Learned counsel for the petiti<t>ner submitted that in Malkharoda she is the only A.N.M. and after her t^ansfer, viilagers have made severai representations to the Minister of th^ Department mentioning therein that will not be any A.N.M. and that is counset for the petitioner submitted Uiat the petitioner may be a!towe|d to make a representaUon to the decide the same, to whtch iearned on. for the parties, having regard to the facts and cireumstances of the cas4 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the pray^r made by leamed counsel ft>r the '. Therefore, the petitioner is allowed to mak®a detailed representation aljong with a copy of this petition to the State/respondent raising ali her griev ances within a period of 10 days from today and in turn, the State/respon^ent shall decide the representation of P.T.O. 31 XI-HC-78 3^'qKRTq', (S-rflu'lia, (slcll^y tnwrr <»)^icb ^ 200 an^T'ra^i' (yit^q^ff) 3n^TwR-<i'=b (raT3IR?TsbHI<») Barve w ff s^iTmTrfscrsn^T -^ the petitioner within a period of 3< representation, after considering al| accordance with law. In the meantime, the effect 4r respect of the petitioner shall rems|in petitioner isdecided. With the direction aforesaid, Consequently, M.(W.)P. N(?. also stand disposed of. Parties are entitled fbr certifield <tii<iFci<)1-( tiiHdTiftecA<Ri<-di< ^sTf^iran^T days from the date of receipt of the the points raised by the petitioner.in nd operation of the impugned order in stayed, till the representation of the ;he petitton stands disposed of. 3.3018/2006 and I.A. No.7347/2006 copyofthisorder. Sd'- L.C.BiieeiM judse P.T.O.