IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23431 of 2009 KAMESHWAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 28.10.2009 Heard. The petitioner was the driver of the tractor and does not deny that he had taken the tractor of the informant for repairs. The petitioner did not come back with the tractor and the informant reported that he had seen the petitioner along with two unknown persons with the tractor at a particular place, in a particular direction. Subsequently, it was found that the petitioner was lying injured. The informant alleged that the petitioner had injured himself on account of being inebriated and was feigning being assaulted and injured by some unknown criminals who took away the tractor. The informant alleged that it was the petitioner who had sold the tractor to some unknown persons for wrongful gains. The contention is that the petitioner has been made a victim of 2 circumstance inasmuch as the tractor was snatched from him by some unknown criminals and the same was taken away and this is the reason that the tractor has not yet been traced out. The further contention is that the petitioner had injuries and he was hospitalized in a couple of hospitals and was treated for assault and injuries caused to him. What strikes the Court most is that the petitioner did not report any incident of being assaulted and snatching of the tractor and considering that the prayer for bail is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)