1 wp-1049-10.sxw dgm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1049 OF 2010 Mr. Dinesh Lakra .... Petitioner vs The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Mr. Satish Mishra i/by Mr.A.M. Saraogi for the petitioner. Mrs. S. D. Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 10th August, 2010 P.C.: We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. We have perused the reliefs prayed for in this petition. 2 If the petitioner is apprehending arrest by the police, he has the remedy to apply for anticipatory bail and such a relief cannot be granted in a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. So far as prayer (a) is concerned, the directions as prayed for cannot be issued and the petition is ill-conceived. 3 The petition is rejected, with liberty to the petitioner as is available in law. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ( B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)