: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.389 OF 2009 Yamunabai Krishnaji Sawant ... Petitioner V/s. The Tahsildar, Wada & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.D.A. Patil for Petitioner None for Respondents CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: NOVEMBER 13, 2009 P.C.: 1. The order of which the petitioner claims there is a breach of is dated 12.11.2008. By this order, the impugned order challenged in the petition has been set aside. It is contended that in view of this order passed on 12.11.2008, surplus lands ought to have been returned to the petitioners. In my opinion, this cannot be a cause for contempt since there is no breach of the order. The order merely states that it was incumbent on the respondents to issue show-cause notice by 1989 and since that was not done, the action is vitiated. 2. Contempt Petition is therefore dismissed.