IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2008 / 24TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 20500 of 2008(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ DR.ANTONY J.MANOOPARAMBIL, MANOOPARAMBIL HOUSE, PARIPPU P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE BRANCH MANAGER, UCC BANK, (A GOVT. OF INDIA UNDERTAKING) CYRILS TOWER, STATION ROAD, NEAR COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, UCO BANK UNDER SARFAESI ACT ZONAL OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE KARITHANAM VARGHESE FOR R1 SRI.V.J.JOHN FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.20500 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 15th day of July, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is challenging proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. However, now he only wants some time to pay off the balance amount due to the respondents, for which only proceedings have been initiated. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that for identical relief the petitioner had earlier approached this court by filing W.P(C).No. 35582/2007, in which the petitioner was permitted to pay off the amount in instalments which the petitioner has not availed of. In so far as the petitioner has already suffered a judgment on the same cause of action, I do not think that I can entertain another writ petition for the same relief, which, I am of opinion, would amount to review of that judgment, which I cannot do. The proper course to be adopted by the petitioner is to seek remedies in that writ petition. Therefore, without prejudice to such right of the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2