HIGHCOURTQFCHHATFISGARH,BILA8PUR M.C.C.6Sof2007 APPLICANTS ^ Bhikhaiii Sao s/o Ranikishun (origiaal plauitiff-died). His Legal Representatives are as foUows: 1. Smt. ChameU Devi, W/o Late Bhikham Sao, aged about 60 years, 2. Shobhanatb Giipta s/o I/ate Bhikham Sao, aged about 42 years. 3. Prakashchaad Gupta s/o Late Bhikham Sao, aged about 32 years.(Sr. 1, 2 & 3 all residents of vfflage- Pindra, Thaoa-Balranipur, Tahsil Pal, Disti-ict- Surguja(CG) 4, Rajwaiiti D/o Late Bhikham Sao and D/o Jahendra Prasad Gupta, aged about 40 years, R/o ViUage-Basen, Post-Basen, Thana-Rajpur, Distdct-Surguja(CG). 5, Sukaati @ Gudhuluwa, D/o Late Bhikhaxa Sao aad W/o Balkishun Gupta, aged about 37 years, R/o Balraxapur, Distorict- Surgiija(CG). 6, Chandrawaati @ Delwa D/o Late Bhikhara Sao and W/o Vijay Gupta, agcd about 35 years, R/o village- Harihargaaj, Thania Post- HarihargaQJ, Distnct- Palainu, iJharkhand, NON-APPLICANTS/ RESPONDBNT8 VERSUS 1. (a) Paancheri Devi W/o Late Raiignatli (Died) 2, (b) Rainesh %/o Rangnath Singh (Died) Note; Botii were Legal Heirs of Origiaal Dcfcndaat Raiignath Siagh and ofter his death (No, 1 ^•C .C^ 55 of 2007 -2- and 2) hroiight on record and also after tiieir cleafh fhe LRs of Ramesh brought on record, 2 (Ka) Smt. Chandrawati Singh, Wd/o Late Raoiesh Singh, aged about 42 years by caste Raj'put, Occupation House wtfe 2(Kha) Sanket Singh s/o Late Ramesh Siagh, aged about 28 years by caste Rajput, Occupation Service. 2(Ga) Abhishek Singh s/o Late Ramesh Siagh, aged about 23 years by caste Rajput, Occupation Stadent 2 (Gha) Abhijit Singh s/o I,ate Ramesh Siagh, aged about 17 years by caste Rajput Occupation Student, through aataral guardiaa niofher. All are fhe R/o village-Seoai, Thana-Balraxnpur, The-Pal, Distnct-Surguja(CG) (c) Uniesh s/o Raagnafh Siagh, agcd,35 years. (d) Suresh s/o Raiiguafh Siagh, aged 28 years. 3. Miiclrika Chonbe s/o Nand Kishore, aged 50 years, R/o viUage-Balrampur, Surguja<CG) 4. State of Chhattisgarh fhrough CoUector, Surguja(CG) Apoearaace: Shn Sunil Tripathi aad Shri I.S,Sahu, Advocates for ttic appUcaiits. M^ ri M.C.C.65/2007 m ORAL ORDER (16.03.2007) SUNILKUMAR SIKrHA,J. Hearf, This is an applicatioii filed for restoration of S.A. No.484/2006, whichwas dismissed 011 account of noii-conipliance oforderdated 28.8.2006. It appears tliat ou 28.8.2006, t1ie following order was passed by tMs Court in S.A.No.484/2006: Ce.No one appears for fhe appellants when the matt.er is called out Office has poiiited oiit certaiii defaiilt in the matter, I^et uecessaiy steps be taken for removal of tlie default within 15 days, failing which this appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the BeDch. If fhe steps are taken, the iiiatter shall be listed for consideratioa iti the Second week ofOctober, 2006, Admittedty, 011 the said date no one had appearecl for the appellaiits aiid a pre-empfiy order was passed fhat the default shall be removefl withui 15 days, failing which this appeal shall stand dismissed withoiit fiirther reference to the Bench. T^eanied couiisel for the applicante siihmit that since no*»i3ad appeared 011 28.8,2006, fhey were havmg 3-10 Ikiiowledge aboiit such au oiider passed by this Court and for this reason onty, the default has been corrtniitted. They siibniit that if one more chance is given, the order shall be complied within 15 days from today itself. Considered. In the facts and circiimstances of fhe case, tlie applicatioii (M.C.C. No.65/2007) for restoration is allowed. -E M.C.C.65/2007 (4) The appeal is restored to its original mimber, today itself and the counsel for the appellanfs is gi-anted 15 days time as per oiTler dated 28,8.2006 to compty with the said order as ifthe said order has been passed .on today, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed wsthoiit fiirther reference to the Beuch. The M.C.C. stands disposed of. A copy ofthis order sliallbe kepf in the I'ecoiyl ofS.A. Sd/- 1 sunil Kumar Sinha judge sunita ^