IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 10TH JANUARY 2011 / 20TH POUSHA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 37 of 2011(S) ---------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.25649/2010 Dated 16/08/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN THE WPC ------------------------------------------------------------ THOMAS PAUL, S/O.PAILY, AGED 54 YEARS, ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSEB GENERATION SUB DIVISION, IDAMALAYAR, RESIDING AT NEDUMTHADATHIL, KADAVOOR P.O., POTHANICAD, ERNAKULAM - 686671. BY ADVS. SRI.P.P.JNANASEKHARAN SRI.S.DILEEP RESPONDENT(S): 2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WPC ------------------------------------------------------ CICILET MARY.J., AGED 54 YEARS, W/O.VIJAYAN, CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM) KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VAIDHYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 004. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC FOR KSEB THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- Cont.Case No.37 of 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 10th January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The direction issued in Annexure -A1 judgment was to consider Ext.P5. In compliance with the above, the respondent has passed Annexure A2 order. 2. The case of the petitioner is that Annexure A2 order does not satisfy the requirement of Annexure-A1 judgment. 3. As already noticed, all that this court ordered was that the respondent should pass orders on Ext.P5 representation filed by the petitioner and this order has been complied with. If the petitioner has a grievance that the order is bad for any reason, it is up to the petitioner to seek his remedies against the said order and the contempt petition is not the proper remedy. Therefore, without prejudice to the petitioner's right to seek his remedies against Annexure A2 order, this contempt case is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma W.P (C) No. 2010 2