IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10931 of 2009 MD.SHOIB ALAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 14.10.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the Counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner has prayed for quashing the resolution taken by Sukh Suvidha Committee in its meeting held on 12.1.2006/12.2.2006, whereby Anjuman Nisha was selected as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra in place of petitioner. Petitioner joined on the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra in the year January, 2004 and continued up to December,2004 but she was not reengaged as it was not extended for the next 11 months. The Sukh Suvidha Committee was of the view that at the first occasion itself petitioner had been selected erroneously in place of Anjuman Nisha, whose position was higher in the merit list. The resolution of the Sukh Suvidha Committee dated 12.1.2006 was not objected by the petitioner, and during this period several developments took place. The guidelines for appointment of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra provides thirty days time for filing objection before the District Magistrate, against the order of appointment. No - 2 - such objection was filed by the petitioner for three years. In this circumstance, the present writ application cannot be entertained being time barred. Petitioner’s prayed for quashing the resolution dated 12.1.2006/12.2.2006 is not maintainable. This application is dismissed. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar