Crl. Misc. No. M-9897 of 2011 (O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-9897 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 1, 2011 Davinder Singh .......................................................... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..................................... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioners contends that respondent No.6 is cousin brother of his wife. The petitioner has lodged an FIR No.35 under Section 307 IPC and 25, 27, 54, 59 of Arms Act on 24.2.2008. Respondent No.6 is facing trial as an accused. On an earlier occasion, FIR under Section 498-A IPC has been lodged which was subsequently quashed on the basis of compromise. This FIR had been registered by his wife under pressure of the family and cousin brother-respondent No.6. Another FIR No. 211 dated 2.10.2008 under Section 364 had been registered at Police Station Phillaur and after investigation petitioner was found innocent. Attempt is being made that the petitioner should make compromise in the FIR in which Crl. Misc. No. M-9897 of 2011 (O&M) [ 2 ] respondent No.6 is facing trial. Counsel for the petitioner prays that a direction be issued to the official respondents to give 7 days notice if the petitioner is required in any case on the instance of the private respondents. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of by giving a direction to the official respondents that the petitioner be given 7 days notice as contemplated under Section 160 Cr.P.C. if he is required in any case. 1.4.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE