IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2010 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 8277 of 2010() ---------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 07/12/2010 IN CMP 7389/2010 IN CMP.7386/2010 of J.M.F.C.-II, KOLLAM CRIME NO.1529/2010 OF ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONERS/2ND & 7TH ACCUSED ------------------------------------------- 1. NAUFAL, AGED 19 YEARS, S/O.NASAR, MUPPASSERI VAYALIL VEETTIL, SANGADHARA NAGAR-149, THEKKEVILA CHERY, MUNDAKAL VILLAGE. 2. NAUFAL, AGED 19 YEARS, S/O.SHAJAHAN, MALIKA VEETTIL, KOCHU THANGAL NAGAR-336, VADAKKEVILA CHERY, VADAKKEVILA VILLAGE. BY ADVS. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN RESPONDENT(S): STATE ----------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSEUCUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ V. RAMKUMAR, J. --------------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.8277 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2010 ORDER The petitioners, who are accused Nos.2 & 7 in Crime No.1529 of 2010 of Eravipuram Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 326 & 308 read with Section 149 I.P.C. and 27 of Arms Act, seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 05/12/2010. The petitioners were arrested on 07/12/2010. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioners, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj