1 crr168-11.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COURT RECEIVER’S REPORT NO.168 OF 2011 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.935 OF 2010 Motibhai K. Patel & Anr .. Petitioners versus Ms.Seemaben S. Patel & Anr .. Respondents Mr.Vishal Sheth i/by Mr.Bimal Rajasekhar for the petitioners. Mr.A.M.Vernekar for respondent No.1. Mr.Babubhai K. Patel, respondent No.2, present in person. Mr.N.A.Bandodkar, 2nd Assistant to Court Receiver, present. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 24th August 2011. P.C.: . The report is rendered infructuous because the 2nd respondent is present in the Court in pursuance of the notice given by the Court Receiver and has stated before the Court that he will execute necessary document evidencing formal possession of the Court Receiver in respect of premises in his possession. In other words, he has no objection to hand over formal possession of the premises to the Court Receiver. In view of this statement, nothing survives in this report and it is disposed off. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)