IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14453 of 2009 RAJU YADAV, son of late Bijay Yadav, resident of village – Bishanpur, P.S. Sono, District – Jamui. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 3.8.2009 Sono P S Case No. 132 of 2005 has been instituted against the petitioner under several sections of the Indian Penal Code including section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. As per the FIR, a group of 60-70 people came to the site of one Sandhya Construction Company. They not only looted some money and mobile but also set fire to certain plant and machinery involved in the construction of road. FIR was lodged against the so-called NCC extremists and nobody was named in the FIR as such. From the perusal of the order sheet it emerges that name of the petitioner subsequently has transpired but it is not clear what was the basis. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that utmost it is a case of suspicion and nothing substantive has been found with the petitioner or against the petitioner. It is also submitted that many persons have been granted benefit of bail the details of which have been indicated in para 11 of the application and the case of the petitioner stands on similar footing. Keeping the above submission in mind, let the petitioner Raju Yadav be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection - 2 - with Sono P S Case No. 132 of 2005, with a direction that one of the surety will be executed by the wife of the petitioner and the other by an elected representative of the Village Panchayat to which petitioner belongs. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)