CRM No.M-28706 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:-14.10.2010 Angrej Singh son of Thakar Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr.Vivek Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Shilesh Gupta, D.A.G.Punjab. M ehinder S ingh S ullar , J . (Oral) Having exercised his right of regular bail and lost in the Court of Addl.Sessions Judge, petitioner Angrej Singh s/o Thakar Singh, has directed the present petition for regular bail in a case registered against him alongwith his other co-accused, vide FIR No.71 dated 15.7.2010, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under sections 148, 307, 323 and 364 read with section 149 IPC and sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act by the police of Police Station Mamdot, Distt.Ferozepur, invoking the provisions of section 439 Cr.PC. 2. Notice of the petition was issued to the State. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, having gone through the record with their valuable help and after bestowal of thoughts over the entire matter, to my mind, the present petition deserves to be accepted in this context. 4. What is not disputed here is that Devender Singh son of Angrej Singh, co-accused of the petitioner was allowed bail by the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, by virtue of order dated 11.8.2010 (Annexure P1) under the similar set of circumstances. The petitioner was arrested on 25.8.2010 CRM No.M-28706 of 2010 2 and since then he is in judicial custody. There is no history of previous involvement of the petitioner in any such case. As even the charges have not been framed, therefore, the conclusion of trial would naturally take long time. The incident originated at the spur of the moment. Moreover, no useful purpose would be served in further detaining the petitioner in jail. 5. So, taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances, emanating from the record, as discussed here-in-above, to me, the present petitioner is entitled to regular in the obtaining circumstances of the case. 6. In the light of the aforesaid reasons and without commenting further anything on merits, lest it may prejudice the case of either side during the course of the trial of the case, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court. 7. The instant petition is disposed of accordingly. 14.10.2010 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) AS Judge