- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION No. 55 OF 2009 IN CONTEMPT PETITION No. 100 OF 2008 Rafique Hasham Pendhari & Ors. ... Petitioners Vs. Bajirao Laxman Jadhav & Ors. ... Respondents *** Mr. A. M. Kulkarni, for the petitioners. Mr. Balwant V. Patole h/f S. M. Masal for respondent No. 2. Mr. Vilas A. Jadhav for Savagave, for respondents Nos. 4 to 11. *** CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : JULY 10, 2009. PC :- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners , respondent No.2 and respondent Nos. 4 to 11. None appears for respondent Nos. 1 and 3 though served. Present Civil Application is taken out for restoration of above contempt petition. The Contempt Petition was dismissed for petitioner’s failure to serve respondents, pursuant to order dated 18-12-208. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that after dismissal of the contempt petition in default, actually respondents were served and - 2 - they have also appeared in the Civil Application through their advocates. In that view of the matter and for the reasons stated in the application, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer Clause (b). 2. Office is directed to issue fresh notices in contempt petition returnable after 4 weeks. Mr. Balvant V. Patole and Mr. Vilas Jadhav waive service for the respondent No. 2 and 4 to 11 respectively. Liberty to the petitioners to serve Mr. Keluskar, learned advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Sd/- [ R. V. MORE, J.]