IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL WRIT No. 4070 of 2007 NANALAL & ORS. V/S A.D.J.(F.T.) NO. 2, UDAIPUR & ANR. Mr. TRIBHUVAN GUPTA, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 22.8.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the application and the impugned order. From perusal of record, it transpires that the application was filed seeking to produce certain documents, but alongwith that, various other documents had also been filed, for which there is no prayer in the application, and those documents had been marked exhibit by the petitioner in his affidavit. It also appears that after the impugned order, yet another application has been filed under Order 8 Rule 1 for producing still further documents. In the totality of circumstances, looking to this conduct of the petitioner, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/