Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPC (OAC) No. 2564 of 2008 Arjun Charan Mohanty ….. Petitioner Mr. S. Mallik, Advocate Vs. State of Odisha and others ….. Opposite parties State Counsel CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI ORDER 01.02.2022 Order No. 01 This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode. 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to count the service rendered by the applicant on job contract basis for the purpose of pension and accordingly to revise the pension and also release the arrear differential amount within a stipulated period. 3. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before opposite party no.1 highlighting the grievances and direction may be given to consider the same within a stipulated time, taking into consideration the order under Annexure-4 and 5, by which the similarly situated persons have been extended the same benefit pursuant to the order passed in O.A. No. 3327 (C) of 2003, to which learned counsel for the State has no objection. 4. As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, however, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of with the direction that in case the petitioner, with regard to the grievance made in this petition, files a fresh comprehensive representation before opposite party no.1, within fifteen days hence, the said authority shall consider the same and pass a reasoned and speaking order, taking into consideration the order under Annexures-4 and 5, as expeditiously Page 2 of 2 as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation along with the certified/ authenticated copy of this order. 5. As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020, as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021, and Court’s Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos.514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022. Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE