IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.345 OF 2007 Mr.Sampat Madhav Tribhuvan and Anr...Appellants V/s Mr.Madhav Baburao Sonkamble and Anr..Respondents Shri M.L.Patil for the Appellants Shri Chetan Agrawal for Respondent no.1 and 2 CORAM:S.R.SATHE,J. DATED:18th Oct.2007 P.C.:- 1. Heard both the learned Advocates. 2. Perused the papers. 3. From the submissions made before me it is very clear that main dispute is pertaining to 3 parking lots.During the course of arguments, the learned Advocate for the defendant no.1 submitted that at present defendant no.1 is having only 1 car and he is parking the same in parking lot no.1. So, by way of temporary arrangement without prejudice to the rights of both the parties the defendant no.1 be permitted to park his vehicle in parking lot no.1. The plaintiffs may park their vehicles in other two parking lots which are marked as parking lot nos.2 and 3 in the rough sketch produced during the course of argument and which is taken on record and marked ’X’ for identification. The learned Advocate for the plaintiff also submitted that he has no objection for the same. 4. Hence the defendant no.1 and plaintiffs to park their vehicles as mentioned above till the disposal of the suit. 5. A.O. is disposed of in the above terms. 6. Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. (S.R.SATHE,J.)