IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 6765 of 2010(U) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- T.K.THARIKUTTY HAJI, S/O.UMMERKUTTY,AGED 69 YEARS, RESIDING AT 'THAMANNA',P.O,KOODALI, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.A.MOHAMED MUSTAQUE SMT.LAKSHMI RAJAN RESPONDENTS ---------------- 1. THE FEDERAL BANK LIMITED. HAVING REGD OFFICE AT ALWAYE, THROUGH BRANCH KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY MANAGER. 2. THE CHIEF MANAGER, FEDERAL BANK,ASSET RECOVERY BRANCH, FEDERAL TOWERS, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE (MANACHIRACKEL) ADV. SRI.P.R.MILTON ADV. SRI.K.J.CHACKOCHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 6765 OF 2010 ......................................................................... Dated this the 6th April, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner prays for a direction to the respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exts. P3 and P5. 2. The learned Counsel for the respondent Bank, on instruction, submits that the petitioner had availed two business loans, the first one for Rs.4 lakhs and the other one for Rs.10 lakhs, tenure in respect of both the loans are over. It is also submitted that as on date a total sum of Rs.15,39,562/- is to be cleared by the petitioner and steps are going on for realisation of the said amount, the correctness of which is disputed from the part of the petitioner . 2. The learned Counsel for the respondent Bank submits that the representations preferred by the petitioner will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. W.P.(C) No. 6765 OF 2010 2 In the said circumstance, the Writ Petition is closed recording the submission made from the part of the respondents and the outcome shall be communicated to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk