IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44840 of 2008 1. RANDHIR MAHTO 2. GAINU MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 23/12/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a protest- cum-complaint case under Sections- 302, 148, 149, 324 and 201 of I.P.C. The submission is of false implication. Final report was submitted that “case was true but no clue”. The allegations are of the petitioner being a member of the mob indulging in firing. Seven to eight firearm injuries have been found on the body of the deceased and his head was severed from the body. The application is rejected. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)