IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40213 of 2010 DANI RAI & ORS . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02/ 10-Nov-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. It has been submitted that all the six petitioners are close relations and agnates of the informant and there is counter case also lodged by petitioner no.6, Yogendra Rai who is brother of the informant. Considering the aforesaid submissions, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners no. 1,2,3,5 and 6 is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks, let the petitioners, namely, 1. DANI RAI, 2. BHANI RAI, 3. BIRJU RAI, 4. BHOLA RAI AND 5. YOGENDRA RAI be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.7000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in Sarairanjan P.S. Case No.23 of 2010, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. 2 So far as petitioner no.4, DAYAL RAI is concerned, although there is no allegation of repetition of blow but there is specific allegation that he gave farsa blow on the head of the informant and the injury report of the informant corroborates allegation. In that view of the matter, it is not deemed proper to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner no.4. Prayer is rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner no.4 if he surrenders and seeks regular bail. perwez ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)