IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C. R No. 35 of 2011 Decided on: 29.7.2011 Balbir Singh …Petitioner Versus Bhup Ram …Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. G.R. Palsra, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition with a liberty reserved to his client to file a fresh petition on the same and similar cause of action, if otherwise permissible and if so advised. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma). Judge. July 29, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?