1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2637/2009 (Jagdev Singh Vs. Stae Bank of India & Ors.) Date of order : 27.03.2009 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Sanjeet Purohit, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is prayed for following reliefs : i)The notice impugned notice (Annex-2) may kindly be declared illegal and the same may kindly be quashed and set aside. ii)The respondent Bank may kindly be directed to consider the representation of the petitioner (Annex-3) in a sympathetic manner and to decide the same. iii)The respondent Bank may further be directed to allow some more appropriate time to the petitioner for repayment of the loan. iv)The respondents may be restrained from taking any coercive actions against the petitioner in pursuance of the notice (Annex-2). 2 In my opinion, there is substance in prayer No.(ii) made by the petitioner in the prayer clause. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent Bank to decide the representation of the petitioner sympathetically and while deciding the representation, the bank authorities shall consider the medical grounds of the petitioner so also the circumstances which arose during the year. The bank authorities are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of submitting certified copy of this order. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun