IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3688/2002 BALIRAM NARAYAN PARATE .VS.. RAJASBAI SHAMRAO PARATE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mrs. Shesh, adv for petitioner CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK J. DATE : AUGUST, 17 2011. Heard. Perused the Compromise Pursis Stamp No.8096/2011. The compromise pursis is signed by the counsel for the petitioner. So also the same is signed by the petitioner and the respondent. It is stated in the pursis that the matter is settled between the parties in terms of the compromise which is recorded in the pursis. The properties which are fallen to the share of the petitioner and the respondent are specifically stated in paragraph 4 of the pursis. The petitioner and represent are personally present in the court today. This court enquired from the petitioner and the respondent as to whether they have settled the matter in terms of the compromise. Both the parties have answered in the affirmative and have stated that they are ad-idem over the terms stated in the compromise pursis. I have perused the contents of the compromise pursis. The terms of the compromise appear to be fair and reasonable. The writ petition is therefore disposed of in terms of the compromise pursis with no order as to costs. JUDGE SMP