IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.V.K.BALI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 11TH DECEMBER 2006 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 WA.No. 2928 of 2001() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.24758/1999 Dated 20/07/2001 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER -------------------------- JAMES GEORGE, PROPRIETOR, ST.MARY'S I.T.C., 4TH FLOOR, MUNICIPAL BUILDING, CHINNAKKADA, KOLLAM-691 001. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR D.G.E. & T, NEW DELHI. 2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 3. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL TRAINING, TAHIKKADU, TRIVANDRUM. 4. MR.SUDARSANAN, ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL TRAINING, TAHIKKADU, TRIVANDRUM. 5. K.SUJATHA, PRINCIPAL, I.T.C. FOR WOMEN, KOLLAM-12. R1 BY MR.JOHN VARGHESE, ASST. SOLICITOR GENERAL BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS KOSHY R2 & R3 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.M.R.SABU THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.K. BALI, C.J. & C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- W.A.No.2928 of 2001 ------------------------------- Dated, this the 11th day of December, 2006 JUDGMENT V.K.Bali,C.J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant states that in view of the observation made by the learned Single Judge in the impugned judgment that 'the dismissal of the original petition would not stand in the way of the petitioner applying for the course prospectively for the coming years, which can be considered based on an inspection by the authorities', this writ appeal be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. All pending civil miscellaneous petitions would stand closed. V.K. BALI, CHIEF JUSTICE. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE. vns