1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO.1231 OF 2010 (M/s. Shri Bajrang Industries .vs. Smt. Sangita wd/o. Vijay Giri and Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 20, 2010. Heard Shri. Rohit Joshi, learned counsel for the Appellant. The appellant/employer has been directed to pay the amount of penalty. In the light of the question as formulated, I have perused the impugned judgment delivered by the Commissioner, Workmen Compensation. I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity in said consideration and the Insurance Company has rightly not been saddled with that liability of penalty. With the result, this appeal u/s.30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act,1923 is dismissed. Since the appeal is dismissed, Civil Application No. 3051 of 2010 for grant of stay is rejected. JUDGE jais