O£ )W/é IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT agmspun (cg PETITIONER w.P. (S) uo. ég$ 12011 Shobhnath Singh Shyam, aged about 57 years, S/o Shri Bisahuram Shyam, Head Master, Government Aa. Ja. Ka. Girls Primary School Kumhari, Block Marvahi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSQS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secreta ry, Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Composite Building Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) District Education Officer Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block Marvahi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Collector ( Tribal Development ) Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPQNDENTS / WRIT PETITION QNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ONSTITUION OF INDIA CN / , HIGH COURT OF CHHA1TISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETlTlON (S) NO.648 OF 2011 (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. * i Present :- Shri K.S. Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. ‘ Shri Sushii Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 3' day of February, 201 1) Heard learned counsel for the parties. tn By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and provide benefit of FR 22 (D) of the Chhattisgarh Fundamental Ruies for grant of increments, as provided under the rules and also to pay arrears from the date when it became due. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the identical matter has already been considered and decided by this Court vide order dated 27-3-2008 in W.P. (S) No.4991 of 2006 and the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said decision. Learned counsel appearing for the State does not dispute that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P. (S) No.499‘l of 2006. Learned counsel further submits hat if the petitioner files fresh representation before the concerned authorities for the reliefs, which he has claimed by‘way of this petition, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, subject to verincation of facts. For the foregoing reasons, the instant petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the respondent authorities raising all of his grievances raised in this petition and on such representation being made, the respondent authorities shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. l Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri /\) t PETITIONER Shobhnath Singh Shyam Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others