THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3774 OF 2011 Date: 11-11-2011 Between Myneni Bhavani …..Petitioner And Myneni Koteswara Rao and six others …..Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3774 OF 2011 ORDER: This revision is filed by the petitioner – 4th plaintiff under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to revise the docket order dated 12-07- 2011 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Nuzvid, Krishna District allowing I.A No. 619 of 2011 in O.S No. 43 of 1982 filed by the respondent – 1st defendant for receiving registration extracts of sale deeds, dated 17-01-1970 and 19-03-2008, subject to proof and relevancy. In spite of service of notice, none appears for the respondents. It is not disputed that earlier when the respondent – 1st defendant after his cross examination filed an application for amendment of the written statement taking the plea that the properties covered under item Nos. 6 to 9, 11, 13 and 14 to 22 are his self acquired properties, the same was dismissed by the Court below and confirmed by this Court in C.R.P No. 3847 of 2008. Again he filed the present I.A stating that he has already stated in the written statement that except Acs.6.50 cents allotted to his share in the partition between himself, his father and brother, rest of the properties except item Nos. 10 and 12 are his self acquired properties. Further he contended in the written statement that the properties gifted to him belong to him and the respondents – plaintiffs have no right in the properties. To substantiate the same, it appears that the respondent – 1st defendant has filed the present I.A seeking to receive the registration extracts of sale deeds which was allowed as stated above. The lower Court ought to have considered that the present I.A is filed by the respondent – 1st defendant to receive the documents only to fill up the lacunae and to circumvent the earlier order passed by the trial Court rejecting his plea for amendment of the written statement as confirmed by this Court. Hence, the lower Court is not justified in passing the impugned order. In view of the same, order, dated 12-07-2011 is set aside and I.A No 619 of 2011 is dismissed. The civil revision petition is accordingly allowed. A. GOPAL REDDY, J 11-11-2011 ks