^4^ ^y^ ,^%^ ^My .t^iS'-.'' rf \ .-n ^) ^' °c <*'' A ^ ^ ^-£.y .<*. \ .!? ila" IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT: BILASPUR W.P.fSINo.?^^ OF 2010 PETITIONER: Arvind Kumar, aged 50 years, son of Shri Amroj Singh, Waiter, Babuji restaurant, near Civil Court, Bilaspur, district Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, department ofHome, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Superintendent ofPolice, district Rajnandgaon, at Rajnandgaon (C.G.) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. *11*<<111»»11<(» ^SE[ ^WM^, Q-^WW, VsfWWy, —Ml.?;..^.w>.;.2:t^./.10..•^,200 ^ sn^iw K-fi+ 'tP!IT 3CT^!T st>*ii«!t> Tymane sn^i TR?T ('^fs^?) ?wiw ^Eifta sn^i SB: Hon'ble Shri 13-OS-2010 Shri Somnath Verma, counse! fort ShriVinod Tekam, Panel Lawyerfi Heard. By this pstition, the pstitioner ha^ dated 30-10-1999 (Annexure P-1), by w|iieh, penatty of compuisory retiremenf has been imposed on the petifioner. T legality and validity of order have been petitioner had filed a departmental appe^ far. Learned counsel for the petitioner 3r. appeal has been decided titl date nor aitiy retiral dues in view ofthe order of punishment have been paidto the petjtion| in vjew of the fact that the c| consideration, atthis stage, 1 deem itexri with a direction to respondent No.1 to dei); by the petitioner against the order d4 expeditious'y as possible prefsrably withj date of receipt of a copyofthis order. Iftti) it goes wthout saying that the petitioner. dues in implementation ofthe orderofpur|i Wift the aforesaid direction, the p^tition is finaliy. disposed of. ^ti<iif(<fli iii^i'^f i^sl<n <^i<$t< '^sifOTan^i le petitioner. 'rthe State/respondents. assailed legality and validity of order fiough severa! grounds assaiiing the raised, it is revealed that though the il, the same has not been decided so submits that neither the deparbTiental lepartmental appeal is still pending edient to finally dispose of the petition ;ide the departmentat appeal preferred ted 30-10-1999 (Annexure P-1), as in a period of ttiree months from the are was no stay ofthe order of penaity, oughtto have been paid his all retira! ishment. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge SIVfW ^SV yl»M,<I»H-<Fira—-FS.'147—2/2fll0 —1,OB,000.