[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 3465/2008 KULDEEP KUMAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. Date: 18.09.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. Ajay Tantia for the petitioner. **** The only controversy in this writ petition is that the petitioner submitted application for seeking voluntary retirement which has not been accepted and was refused vide order impugned dated 26.09.2007 (Annexure-8) on the count that disciplinary enquiries under Rule 16 and 17 of the CCA Rules are pending against the petitioner and, therefore, the application seeking V.R.S. cannot be accepted. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not aware of any disciplinary enquiry pending against him under Rule 16 and 17 of the CCA Rules and no communication to this effect has been made. Further, by way of notice for demand of justice, the respondents are called upon to give details of the enquiries which are alleged to be pending against the petitioner and after serving notice for demand of justice, the present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner. [2] I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and carefully gone through the material available on the record and considered the averments made in the writ petition. It is admitted that the petitioner has served a notice for demand of justice (Annexure-10) upon the respondents through his counsel and it is expected from the respondents to respond the above notice for demand of justice and inform the petitioner as to which enquiry is pending against him under Rule 16 and 17 of the CCA Rules as the petitioner alleged that he has not received any information to this effect, but in any case, at this stage this Court do not find any illegality in the order impugned dated 26.09.2007 by which the respondents refused to accept the application of the petitioner seeking voluntary retirement on account of enquiries pending against him under Rule 16 and 17 of the CCA Rules. No writ, order or direction, as prayed for, required to be issued by this Court and no interference whatsoever is called for in the order impugned dated 26.09.2007. Consequently, the writ petition fails and the same is hereby dismissed. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/