IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16239 of 2007 Bharat Kumar Yadav, son of Narshing Yadav, resident of village Mahkola, P.S. & P.O. Haveli, Khadagpur, District- Mungher ……… Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.The Secretary, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna 4.The District Magistrate, Mungher 5.The District Superintendent of Education, Mungher 6.The Block Development Officer, Haveli Khadagpur, Mungher 7.The Block Education Extension Officer, Haveli Khadagpur, Mungher 8.The Principal, Primary School, Barai Gram Panchayat, Haveli Khadagpur, Mungher ………… Respondents. ----------- 2. 25/03/2010 Learned counsels agree that the Appellate Authorities constituted by the State Government under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Sart) Niyamvali, 2006 (as amended by Amendment Act, 2008) are now functional and hence an efficacious alternative forums is available to the petitioner and others for consideration of all their grievances in respect of their employment. I.A.No.2339 of 2010 has been filed in this case by one Suman Kumar for being impleaded as party respondent. Learned counsel submits that the intervener had filed writ application before this Court being C.W.J.C.No.1716 of 2008 and he has been directed to file appeal before the - 2 - appellate authority. Pursuant to the said order, intervener has also filed an appeal before the appellate authority in which present petitioner is the respondent. In the circumstances, I.A. is allowed. However, petitioner is not required to file fresh appeal before the appellate authority and he may appear in the appeal filed by the intervener raising his own grievances. The appellate authority shall consider the grievances of the petitioner also along with the grievances of the intervener and make all endeavours to dispose of the same on its own merits after hearing both the parties by a speaking order, preferably within the time prescribed under the Rules for the purpose, without going into the question of limitation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner. This writ application is accordingly disposed of with the above observations and directions. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)