1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8832 OF 2010 Suresh V. Jadhav ....Petitioner v. Chabubai Babugir Gosavi & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Madhavi Tavanandi, adv. For the Petitioner. None for the respondents. CORAM : J.H.Bhatia, J. DATE : 29th October, 2010. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner contends that the order under challenge is dated 28.9.2010 passed by the Civil Judge Junior Division below the application , Ex.74 filed by the plaintiff on 13.9.2010. That application was filed by the plaintiff/petitioner for amendment in the plaint. The trial court on the same day directed interested party to file say. As no say was filed by the defendants, the trial Court directed on 28.9.2010 as follows: “ Till today the defendant nos.1 to 6 having submitted say to this application hence, note is taken. Application to proceed further.” It is difficult to understand how this order could have been challenged by the plaintiffs. Not only this, the order passed by the trial Court was in favour of the plaintiff that the application be heard without any 2 reply from the other side. There is no substance in the petition. 2 Petition stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)