IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.23406 of 2011 Raushan Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3/ 28.09.2011 This application has come under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of the petitioner. It has been submitted that despite his having mentioned in paragraph 15 that the petitioner was an accused in one other case, it was inadvertently ordered on 01.08.2011 while granting bail to the petitioner that an affidavit would be sworn on his behalf that he is not accused in any other case. The order dated 01.08.2011 is modified to the extent that condition no. (ii) is deleted. However, the court below before releasing the petitioner on bail will make enquiry about the fact that the petitioner is accused in only one other case. Let this order be communicated to the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No.403 of 2010 through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)