IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.64 of 2008 RAM KISHORE SINGH Versus B.R.A.BIHAR UNIVERSITY &ORS ----------- For the appellant : Mr. Shekhar Singh, Advocate Mr. Manindra Nath Tiwari, Advocate For the respondents - : Mr. Ajay Behari Sinha, Advocate B.R.A.Bihar University ------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ----- Dated, the 11th September, 2008 This Letters Patent Appeal is wholly frivolous and devoid of any substance. 2. Writ petition filed by the petitioner came to be disposed of by the Single Judge on 07th March, 2007 by the following order: “Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the respondents. At the outset of the hearing, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents no.1 to 5 has drawn my attention to notification bearing Memo no.B/2189 dated 15th November,2006, issued by the respondent-University, as contained in Annexure-B to the counter affidavit, in order to show that the grievance of the petitioner with regard to shifting of his date of promotion under 16 years time bound promotion with effect from 13.2.1992 has been fulfilled and, as such, the writ application has become infructuous as on today. It is, however, submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the aforesaid notification dated 15.11.2006 (Annexure- B) has not been given due effect as yet. As such, the respondent-University should take all necessary steps in giving effect to the notification, as contained in Annexure B to the counter affidavit. - 2 - It is hoped and trust that the respondent-University shall take all necessary steps for giving due effect to the notification dated 15.11.2006 (Annexure-B) as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months. The writ application is, thus, disposed of with the above observation/direction.” 3. The review application was filed by B.R.A. Bihar University and others seeking review of the order dated 07th March, 2007 since the operation of the notification dated 15th November, 2006 was issued pursuant to the order dated 09th August, 2006 passed in CWJC No. 9939 of 2005. From the said order, LPA No.607 of 2006 was preferred and by the order dated 17th January, 2007, the order dated 09th August, 2006 was stayed, based on which the notification dated 15th November, 2006 came to be issued. The Single Judge having apprised the situation, reviewed the order dated 07th March, 2007. In our view, the Single Judge did the right thing. Having not done so, the order dated 07th March, 2007 would have been unsustainable, since the very foundation of the notification dated 15th November, 2006 has been stayed in LPA No.607 of 2006. 4. The order dated 27th November, 2007 reviewing the order dated 07th March, 2007 is justified and does not suffer from any mistake. 5. L.P.A. is dismissed in limine. R.M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J. Sunil