1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2303 OF 2009 Ramesh Narsing Telang Versus The State of Maharashtra. 1. Heard learned counsel for the accused/ applicant - Ramesh Narsing Telang- extensively. Perused the police papers and the report. A long drawn chain involving Lakhs of rupees of the Agricultural Produce Marked Committee, was involved, indicated in the audit report caused by the Auditor. The prima facie details displayed there were withdrawal at the behest of the accused applicant Ramesh at the end of 30th September, 2004 Rs.1,43,043/- and 69,810/- the total was Rs.1,74,133/-. In the earlier audit expenses of Rs. 1,048 was shown. Subsequently, on 28th January, 2005, the A.P.M.C. has recovered Rs.1,35,355/- from the accused/ applicant and consequently the residue now is Rs.28,294/-. 2. It is not prima facie indicative that such withdrawal by the accused / applicant was under a wrong notion of his employment dues as with a calculated ideas and ill motives the amount was 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. withdrawn and misappropriated. Remittance of balance of dues will not, at this stage, exonerate the accused/ applicant from culpability. The investigation is in progress, need not be stalled. The custodial interrogation of the accused/ applicant will provide the source of other associates including the record. Consequently, without further adverting on the applicant being loosing his employment based on his custody, at this stage, the request for grant of pre-arrest bail is refused. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:20/07/2009. ans/2303