C^-l.aTO INTHEJllGliCOURT OF JUD^ATURCcHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR W. P^) gf0. QF 2006 ^- PETITIONER /y ^^i^"' .^^- ^y ^- ^ RESPONDENTS ^^ <» •o^ ^.^-O f)^v^> ^./y - A- iS^- ^ Devendra Pratap Singh, S/o Late- Ramdhani Singh, Lecturer (Incharge Principal), Aged about 50 Govt. Higher Secondary School, Doomertari R/0 - Mana Camp Distt-Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS /l. Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhavan Raipur(C.G.) 2. Direcfor, Public Instructions Deptt. Directorate, Raipiir (C.G.) 3. Distt. Education Officer, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) WRIT TmoNUNDER_ARTTCLE 226/2^ OF THff '-"^^ITUTION OF ^ Ind^FpRISSUANCR OF STHTAS^^W^MRE^TKW'ET^ HI6H COURT OF CHHATaS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S)No. 850 of 2007 Petitioner Oevendra Protap Singh Versus Respondents 6ovt. of Chhatt-isgarh & others Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justi<»Satjsh K. Ayihotri. Shri Anil Singh Ra^iut, Advocate for The Petitioner. Shri Satish fiupta, Dy. 6ovt. Advocate for the State/respondents. ^! ORDEft (Passed on this 13th day of February, 2007) 1. The petitioner is working as Lecturer in the Sovemment Higher Secondary School, Doomertari. The petitioner obtained B. Ed. Examination cert-ificate in the mon-tti of June. 1988. on his own expenses. 2. Leamed counset appearing for -the petitioner submits that the ~t question involved, herein asto wrfiether the teacher, who obtained B.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses, is entitled to two advance increments. 3. According to leamed counset for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments m view of the decision of Ihis Court in the case of yashwant Kunar Bharadw<y Vs. Municipal Corpomtion. burg and another {2006 Q3) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in •the case of Yoshwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. AAunicipal Corporation, Durg and onother (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Certificate on their own expenses, are covered by the circular dated 24.12.98 (Annexure P/7) issued by the State fiovemment of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Leamed counsel for the petitioner furthersubmits -that the facts and question of law involved in the present case are squarely covered by decision of +his Court in the case of Vashwant Kwnar Bharodw<y Vs. Municipal Corporation. Durg and another (Supra), to which leamed counsel appearing for the respondents fairly concedes ond agrees with the averment made by leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of yashwant l&flnar Bharodwaj Vs. Munfcipal C<yporation. Durg and another (Supru), subject to verification of •the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circufars dated 24.12.1998 A 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advonce increments or not. No order as to costs. Bablu Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotti Judge