1 jpc/- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 448 OF 2004 Dattatraya B. Gilbile and others .. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri P. S. Kansara, for Petitioners/applicants Shri S. R. Nargolkar, AGP for Respondents 1 to 5 Ms. Revati Mohite -Dere for Respondents 6 to 9 Shri R. S. Datar for Respondent No.10 CORAM: J. N. PATEL, & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED: 3rd July, 2009 P. C. 1. Heard. 2. The consent terms were tendered by the parties yesterday i.e. 2nd July, 2009. The parties were present before the Court and they confirmed that the consent terms have been read over and explained to them by their respective Advocates and having understood the same, they have affixed their signatures on the same. The learned counsel for the parties have also signed the consent terms. But as the Court time was over, the matter has been listed today. We therefore take the consent terms on record and mark “X for identification. ” 3. The Petition stands disposed of in accordance with the consent terms X . “ ” 2 4. Ld. AGP states that as the consent terms amount to transfer of immovable property which may attract stamp duty and require registration. We make it clear that the parties would pay necessary stamp duties and register the documents if required under the Stamp Act and the Indian Registration Act. The petition sands disposed of accordingly. 5. In view of the fact that the parties have arrived at mutual settlement, Revenue authority to take cognizance of the same and carry out formality of mutation of the properties in the name of the parties. ( MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (J. N. PATEL, J.)