•^ ^ IW THB mGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH ATBILASPUR ~^~ WRIT PETITION ^o. (2-2>4-3> OF 2005 PETITIOMER Ravindra Singh, aged 47 years, son of Ravi Ranjan Singh, Assistant Grade -I, Secretariat, Chhattisgarh Vidhan Sabha, R/o. F-6, P.W.D. Colony, Katora Talab, Raipur, Dlstt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSU8 \ RESPOMDBWTS /. SecretariaCoh^-fry^h ^^ Sc<^ • through fhe Secretary, Chhattisgarh Vidhan Sabha, Raipur Distt. Ralpur (C.G.) 1 O^ ^^3urendra Kuinar Bafham, Asstt. "^Grade- I, Secretariat, C.G. Vidhan Sabha, Raipur (C.G.) Keshar Singh Kanwar, Asstt. Orade- [, Secrctariat, C.G. Vidhan Sabha, Raipur(C.G.) 4. Rampal Kanwar, Asstt. Grade- I, / Secretariat, C.G. Vidhan Sabha, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITIOW UNDER ARTICUB 226/227 OF THB COHSIITUTION OF IMDIA FOR ISSUANCB OF WRIT CT THE NATDRB OF MANDAMUS, CBRTIORARY AMD/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WMT OF LDKE NATDRE ^fl vj-cq^l^ioq, tPTTl<<1<l<?, RlC')l'<-iy'< ia,^ .^..^o....^.^.^.^^ 3ir^$TIra^((^rfg^g) 3TT^5Tc]FyTR-lJ<b ^snaff^^T^^p ?^7TWr^rfi?T3^5T 15.06.2005 Shri Saajay K, Agravi Heard on adraission. Leamed counsel fo! proinotion of fhe petitionerj due siace long aad was petitioner niade a rcprese( aiid after consideration of| 20.2.2005 was issued m petitionerwas promLOted to| Learaed counsel for| though fhe proixiotion was| was given w.e.f 20.2,20( should be given his pr^ similarly placed persons| pronioted and tlie petiticj aoiount ofsalary aad senicj Learaed counsel for| fhe petitioner had filed a vide Annexure-P/ 10 date4 been disposed ofso far, Learaed couiisel fo) present, fhe petition inay coinpeteut aufhority to ubt presejatation <M«fo<nvi+ii+ic>T^"fe^ <<(^i'<-ci^ ^3Tf^T3ff^^T ^al, coiuisel for fhe petitioner. >|r fhe petitioner submits fhat the to the post ofAssistaat Grade-I was given to hini. In fhis regard, Uie to fhe conceraed authonty fhe representation, ttie order dated f^vour of the petitioner by which fhe |the post ofAssistao.t Grade-I, the petitioner fiirther submits that given to fhe petitioner but fhe same |5. Accordiag to fhe petitioner, he >niotion siace fhe date on which (respondents No. 2 to 4) were \ner should be awarded difference c% ^rity etc. the petitioner further subniits fhat letailed representation ia fhis regard 11.04.2005 but the same has not fhe petitioner prays fhat for the >e disposed ofwifh a direction to the decide fhe representation of the SP/FS/2005-20,000 nf ^SET-^wirt^, ip-fn<(-l'll<^, Rlrtl'<+^<< . .^<^^o. ^3'4-?/^^-^ *iiNrii ^^n^ ...........................^.......^200 3IT^$T q^l?(4c|fjc|^) ^ 3TT^^TcPTR4Jch <T2n3TT^^T^^N? "^a^" SP/FS/2005-20,000 i^HW ^rft^T 3TT^^T -24 petitioner within the stipju] coine to aa end. This Uinited praye^ to the other side. The fhat ifthe representatioi]| P/ 10 has not been reasoned order by ftie wifhio. a period of two copy ofthis order along Wifh fhe aforesald disposed of. Consequeatiy, M^ 4625/2005 also staad d^ Certified copy as p^ >tip|ulated period, so fhat the matter may satae decifled cojmpetent m<bnflis <M<4fo<i1<i ^i^oY^'fe^ ^Rrt^l^ ^aif^TSIT^ST can be atlowed even wifhout notices is aUowed aad it is hereby directed filed by fhe petitioner vide Annexure- so far, fhe saine be decicled by a auftiority of respondent No. 1 from fhe date offilmg ofcertified 4rith a copy offhe petition. observation, the petition staads .|W.P. No. 1896/2005 & I.A. No. (.sposed of. ^r rules. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge I; ^