IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.3450 of 2007 Between: A.Salendra W/o.T.Prabhakar R/o.Uttukur village, Shaligouraram Mandal, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Director of Women & Child Welfare, Government of A.P., Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector-cum-Chairman, District Selection Committee of Anganwadi Worker/Helper, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 3 The Project Director, I.C.D.S. Project, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 4 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 5 The Project Officer, office of the Child Development, Project Officer, Nakerekal, Nalgonda District. 6 Yarala Sunitha W/o.Madhusudhan Reddy R/o.Suryapet Town, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents in selecting and appointing the 6th respondent as Anganwadi worker of Utukuru village, Shaligouraram Mandal, Nalgonda District, though she is not the native of Utukuru village and less qualiﬁed and belong to O.C., as illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the conditions stipulated in the notiﬁcation and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment as Anganwadi worker of Utukuru village, Shaligouraram Mandal, Nalgonda District, and to grant such other relief or reliefs. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.C.VENKAT YADAV Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3 & 5: GP FOR WOMEN DEV. & CHILD WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6: MR. V. MADHUSUDHANA RAO The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.3450 of 2007 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 13th October, 2008. IBL