IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20140 of 2010 MD.ALAM, SON OF MD. SAMIR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE VEERPUR, PACHHMI TOLA, P.S. VEERPUR, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 7.12.2010. Heard Shri Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Manish Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Balia P.S. Case No.245 of 2009 for the offence under Sections 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it is a case of prosecution that while informant was returning from Punjab on a train along with this petitioner and one another accused, this petitioner got down from the train at his village and he did not accompany the informant. However, the other co-accused, namely, Shamshad had gone along with the informant and thereafter, it was alleged that he kidnapped the son of informant. It was submitted that the petitioner never N.H./ went to the village of the informant and he has been falsely implicated. Shri Manish Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. It was submitted that firstly the son of the informant was kidnapped by one of the co-accused, namely, Shamshad. Thereafter, he was killed by the accused Shamshad as well as this petitioner. The dead body was subsequently recovered and as such Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added while submitting charge sheet. Keeping in view the seriousness of the allegation and materials on record, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail stands rejected. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)