1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3679 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.2999 OF 2008 Sheetal Palace Co-op. Hsg. Society Ltd. Plaintiff versus M/s.Veena Enterprises and others Defendants Ms.Purnima Bhatia for plaintiff. Mr.S.R.Mishra for defendant nos.1,2,4 and 6. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 23rd March 2011 PC : 1. In the order dated 3rd December 2008 a statement made on behalf of the defendant nos.1,2,4 and 6 was recorded to the effect that they are ready and willing to pay the monthly amounts as mentioned in prayer clause (a) of the Notice of Motion from December 2008 onwards and the said statement was accepted. The learned advocate for the defendant nos.1,2,4 and 6 submits that the said amounts have been paid by the defendant nos.1,2,4 and 6 from time to time. He states that the monthly maintenance charges are being paid to the society from time to time and the taxes are directly paid to the Municipal Corporation every six months. He therefore submits that no orders are required to be passed in the Notice of Motion No.132 of 2009. However, the learned advocate for the plaintiff submits that an administrator of the plaintiff society has been recently appointed. She needs to verify the facts and take instructions. In view thereof, the Notice of Motion is adjourned to 30th March 2011 to enable the plaintiff to seek necessary instructions from the administrator. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) 2 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.132 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.2999 OF 2008 Sheetal Palace Co-op. Hsg. Society Ltd. Plaintiff versus M/s.Veena Enterprises and others Defendants Ms.Purnima Bhatia for plaintiff. Mr.S.R.Mishra for defendant nos.1,2,4 and 6. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 23rd March 2011 PC : 1. In the order dated 3rd December 2008 a statement made on behalf of the defendant nos.1,2,4 and 6 was recorded to the effect that they are ready and willing to pay the monthly amounts as mentioned in prayer clause (a) of the Notice of Motion from December 2008 onwards and the said statement was accepted. Prayer clause (a) of the Notice of Motion pertain to payment of maintenance charges of the society as well as taxes. The learned advocate for the defendant nos.1,2,4 and 6 states that since the monthly maintenance charges have been paid to the society and the taxes have been paid directly to the Municipal Corporation every six months the order dated 3rd December 2008 be modified to that extent. In view thereof, it is clarified that the defendant nos.1,2,4 and 6 shall pay monthly maintenance charges to the society and the half yearly taxes to the Municipal Corporation. The order dated 3rd December 2008 shall stand modified to that extent. The Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed of. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) 3 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2032 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO.2999 OF 2008 Sheetal Palace Co-op. Hsg. Society Ltd. Plaintiff versus M/s.Veena Enterprises and others Defendants Ms.Purnima Bhatia for plaintiff. Mr.S.R.Mishra for defendant nos.1,2,4 and 6. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 23rd March 2011 PC : 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board. 2. This Notice of Motion is taken out of the defendant nos.1,2,4,5 and 6. Since an administrator has been appointed of the defendant no.1 society, this Notice of Motion is not pressed by the defendant nos.1,2,4,5 and 6. The Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed of. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)