PETIT!ONERS/: 1. (Appellants) r REV P g 5 0 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR Review Petition (P.R.) No.10 of 2010 (5% Shyama Bai, w/o Shankar La! Sahu aged about 55 years 2. Shankar La! Sahu, s/o Datia Ram Sahu, aged about 6O years 3. Bhagirathi, s/o Shankar Lal Sahu aged about 32 years ; Gyanaprava w/o Bhagirathi Sahu, aged about30 years ~ AH residents of Vinage Dongri, Tehsil Janjgir (Baloda), Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Versus 1. Danmat Bai, wife of Late Bisahu, aged about 74 years ' Ramadhar, slo Bisahd, aged about 44 years .Kuma‘t, s/o Budhwar, aged about 44 years v Anar Bair w/o Ramadhar, aged about 39: years v All residents of viiiage Dongri, Tehsii Janigi’r (Baioda), Distt. Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) 5. State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Janjgir-Champa. ’ « {Review petition against the order passed on 16-9—2009 in S.A.No.31 4/2009 t on l.A.No.1 for grant of ad-interim relief} Present: V None present for the petitioners. RESPONDENTS: Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. T.P. Shanna, J ORAL ORDER (21 —7-_2mo) ‘ 1. When the passed over matter is called for hearing, none present for the petitioners. No representation is made. i 2'. This review petition has been preferred after 74 days of its limitation and no application for condonation of delay in tiling the petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners. ‘ “ ‘ ‘ 3. Consequently, the petition is dismissed as time barred. No order as to ll costs. 0 Sd/— ‘T.P. Sharma ‘4>// Judge §WW g \ ;