CR No.2715 of 2009 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CR No.2715 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.11.2010 Sukhdev Ram ....Petitioner Versus Pal Ram and others ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate for the petitioner. ... Alok Singh, J.(Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 1.5.2009 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nawan Shahar, whereby request for impleadment and consequential amendment in the plaint was declined. Plaintiff - petitioner has sought impleadment of the subsequent purchasers during the pendency of the suit taking consequential pleading in the plaint, which was declined by the trial Court by observing that the plaintiff can file fresh suit against the subsequent purchasers. In the opinion of this Court, if any property is transferred during the pendency of the suit and third-party rights are created during the CR No.2715 of 2009 2 pendency of the suit, then ordinarily the vendor should be permitted to continue with the suit under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC. In view of the above, this petition is allowed. Application also stands allowed. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 16.11.2010 sk.