IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9880 of 2006 SMT.ANU BHARTI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.12498 of 2006 SANGEETA KUMARI @ SANGITA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.15774 of 2006 NILAM DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 6. 21.06.2011 In view of the similar nature of the cases all of them are being disposed of with a common order. When the matter is called out counsel for the petitioners are not present, even yesterday he had not appeared. From the earlier order, it was directed that the matter be listed after disposal of L.P.A No. 831 of 2006. From a query to the office it appears that on 19.07.2010 L.P.A No. 831 of 2006 was dismissed for non prosecution as nobody appeared on behalf of the appellant. Further learned counsel for the respondent points out that for all practical purposes this writ petition has become infructuous since a fresh election has been held this year and the respective candidates have also taken over. In this view of the matter the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Prakash (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)