1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8795 OF 2009 Shri Santram Laxman Vairage .. PETITIONER VERSUS Sow Suvarnamala Santram Vairage & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. Ruturaj Patil, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T.G. Gaikwad, advocate for respondent nos 1 and 2. CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 23 rd AUGUST, 2010. PER COURT : 1 It is informed by learned counsel for the respondents that the main proceeding i.e. Hindu Marriage Petition no. 109/2007 is already disposed of. The grievance made in the petition is in respect of the order passed by the trial court in respect of award of interim maintenance during the pendency of proceeding. 2 The grievance in the petition is specifically in respect of permissibility to effect recovery of amount towards interim maintenance either with effect 2 from the date of presentation of Hindu Marriage Petition or the date of presentation of the application. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that amount would be recoverable only from the date of presentation of application seeking interim alimony. Said contention does not appear to have been accepted by the trial court. Since the main proceeding is already disposed of, it would be not be appropriate to keep the petition alive which relates to interlocutory order. Petitioner may have liberty to re- agitate the issue before the appropriate forum if permissible in accordance with law. No further orders are necessary to be passed in the petition. Petition stands rejected. 3 In view of dismissal of the petition, pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE dyb/wp8795.09.odt