e -f"t s BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITION (0 N0. ^f^ / 2011 PETITIONER •) .trfS^ ..t^^^ ^^p"^^ '"ncr^ jtESPONDENTS .^ ^^y>--"'^ V* s>' Sajan Kumar, S/o. Late Shri Banarsi Das, Aged about 55 years, R/o. Patthalgoan^" Lailunga, District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OFINDIA ^< PETITIONER HIGM COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C)NO. 7187 OF 2011 Sajan Kumar Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others RESPONDENTS (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Safish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Dy. Advocate General forthe State with Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. Shri C.P. Shrivastava, Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District Raigarh, is also present. ORDER (Passed on this 01st day of December, 2011) 1. Meard learned counsel for the parties. 2. At the very outset Shri Murthy, learned Dy. Advocate General appearing with Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate, on instructions by fhe Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, who is present in the Court, submits that the impugned notice of demolition dated 25.11.2011, which wifhout affording an opportunity of hearing, was issued for demolition of the alleged unauthorized construction, has been withdrawn by subsequent noticedated 26.11.2011. A copy ofthe said notifie istaken on record. 3. In view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, the Nagar Panchayat will not take any action without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the person concerned. The Nagar Panchayat may also decide the question of authorized or unaufhorized structure, as the sanne is in dispute, before passing the order, after considering the cases of the persons concerned. 1 ashok Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Eil?