23’ ;- Fiiéd [LY/( w x 52’ 1 ri‘bunah :- 1. Chandrahan Sing Thakur, Aged 30 years, Son of Ramnath Singh Taku, aged 3O yars, working as Upper Division Teachor at Govt. Middle School, Jairamnagar, Bilaspur resident of Dhanmani Road, Torwa, Bilaspur. n 3 U n 2. Manoj Kumar Dewangan, Son ofJawahar Lal Dewanga, aged 3 years working as pper Divisio Teacher at Boys Higher ' Secondary Scol, Bilaspur resident of Near Tarbahar, Water ho Tank, Indira Colony, Bilaspur. - 1. Te tate of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department oSchoolEducaton, D.K.Bhawan, Raipur. Cattisgarh 2. The Diror, Public Instrtions School Education, Goverent ofChhattisgarh Jail oad, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. District Education Officer, vernment of Chhattisgarh, Opposite Collectorate Oice, Bilaspu Chhattisgarh. i § O.A. OF 2001. APPLICANTS b h hr e d VERSUS RESPONDENTS g h S fi hh. ect uc nm , R Go ff r Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985. DETAILS OF APPLICATION WW EW.W.W am m wags-)‘v-zgglav H200 WW WWR gsaf—lcmm SB Hon’b!e Shn Manmdra Mohan S 18413-2910 Shri M. D‘ Dhote, caunselforth Shri Satish Gupta, GA. forthe3 Heard. The petitioners have fried this p been given to Asst. Teachevs appoints appmac‘ned the Tribunal by filing Orig 24.8.1992). whSrein Tribunal diracted t stated that lhe Slate challenged the 5a No 6892’1993 which was di5mlssed Vic this ( ln number of cases, respondents to consider the cases. Accordingly, this petition is also make representation, if so advised, to perspective, if the petitioners stand on the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative ‘z’aa’g amt 5e eztrers tls. State efit’iF the Supreme Court in 8.L.P. (Civil appropriate order would be passed by the respondents authority. Sdl- hrivastava, J. a petitioners. §tate. atition claiming the similar benetits as have d in between the year 1983—1984 who had nal Application No.274511989 (decided on enefits to be given to all teachers. lt is aiso d order before the Supreme Court in S.L.P. e order dated 3.1 .1994. Bourt has passed orders directing th e disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to consider their cases on its own merits and ;ame footings as per order passed by the Tribunal in QA. No.2745I89 (Madhukant d oihers} and subsequently confirmed by l No.6892/93 by order dated 3.1.1994, a Mohan Shrivastava ‘Man'm9' \ludge