IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35926 of 2010 SATYENDRA KUMAR SON OF UDAY PRAKASH PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.12.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No.287 of 2010 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 365 and 386/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner happens to be the Manager of a Finance Company. Substance of allegation as set out in the first information report is that the petitioner along with certain others demanded certain amount from this informant who appears to have purchased an Alto Car already hypothecated with the Finance Company by its previous owner Dipak Kumar. It is alleged that this petitioner along with others at first instance sought illegal gratification from the informant for release of the Car and upon nonfulfilment seized the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant himself admits 2 that certain dues were outstanding in relation to the car in question which was brought by one Dipak Kumar having been financed by the Finance Company of which the petitioner happens to be the Manager. It is submitted that in that back ground, the allegation set out in the first information report demonstrates that the petitioner has been wrongfully roped in the present case. Regard being had to the circumstances, let the petitioner Satyendra Kumar, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before the court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S.Case No.287 of 2010, subject to the conditions stipulated under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J)