-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 321 OF 2003 APPEAL NO. 321 OF 2003 APPEAL NO. 321 OF 2003 -: -: -: ALONG WITH :- ALONG WITH :- ALONG WITH :- CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 739 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 739 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 739 OF 2005 -: -: -: ALONG WITH :- ALONG WITH :- ALONG WITH :- CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 684 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO. 684 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO. 684 OF 2003 -: -: -: A N D :- A N D :- A N D :- FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 322 OF 2003 APPEAL NO. 322 OF 2003 APPEAL NO. 322 OF 2003 M/s. Veena Diecasters & Engineers Pvt. Ltd. ..... ... ... Appellants. Versus M/s. Arci Engineers................ Respondent. Mr. R. A. Thorat for the Appellants. Mr. K. S. Dewal for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 23RD NOVEMBER, 2005. : 23RD NOVEMBER, 2005. : 23RD NOVEMBER, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: Parties present consent terms dated 23rd December, 2005 duly signed by the appellants / original defendants, Constituted Attorney of the respondent / original plaintiff and also by their respective advocates. Both the advocates as well as parties verify the same and they have no objection -: 2 :- about their signatures and/or the counter signatures of the parties. The said consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 2. Both the first appeals are disposed of in terms of the consent terms as the matter is settled between the parties out of court being money claim. 3. In view of this consent terms, the cross objection filed by the respondent / plaintiff also stands disposed of. 4. In view of this consent terms, decree be drawn accordingly. No order as to costs. 5. In view of the above, the above civil applications are also disposed of. Sd/- (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)