’09 IGH CGURT OF CHHATTESRH: EILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 957 of 2G09 PETITicNER $mt H Som aged 5/ yeafs Widcw of iate < Sant Ram Son! R/o 3-188 Housmg Board ‘ Coiony, Kota Raipur District RmpuHCG) Versus R State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secre€ary, Department of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Devehpment, Mantmiaya. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Commissionen Department of Scheduie’ Caste and Schedule Tr§be Devebpment, Chhatt§sgarh, HQ. Pt. RLSJJ. Campus, Raipur (CG). The Coiiector, Tribai ' Deve‘l'opment Departmeht, Durg, District Durg (CG). Assistanr Commissioner. Oio the Coliector, Tribe! Deveicpment Department, Durg, District Burg (CG). (Writ Petition under Articie 2‘26 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Mr. R.K. Kesharwani. counsel for the petitroner. Mr. Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER {Passad on this 16*“ da; or February 2099) With consent of teamed counsel appearing for the parties ‘he matter is heard tinaiiy 2) This case pertairps/to ’grievahce of non-grant of retirai dues. 3} This Court in the matter of W P No 4§42I2004 (Baijnath Manda! Vs The State of Chhattrsgarh & others) and other connected matters directed the Committee to consrdet the matter of retnai dues as the disputed question of facts were invoived The Committee was constituted by the State Government pursuant to the order dated 19-05-2006 passed in W.P.No.1951/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State éovernment of Chhattisgarh and others), and order dated 13-3-2068 passed in ’M.C.C.‘No. 105 of 2008 (State Vot" Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandai and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 313‘ January, 200$ passed H GA ESPONDENTS ‘