IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.133 OF 2008 Mr. Balkrishna M. Kadam and ors. ..Appellants. Vs. Sonubai Govind Kadam and ors. ..Respondents. Mr. S.M.Gorwadkar for the Appellants. Mr.S.R.Waghmare for the Respondents. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 4th June,2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs. The plaintiffs had filed a suit for partition and separate possession. In the plaint itself they have admitted that there was family partition under which the suit lands has been distributed. The suit was filed by the plaintiffs in the year 1993 and the so called family arrangement was of the year 1964. The case of the defendants was that there was in fact full partition in the year 1964. The revenue record indicates that all the parties were in separate possession of the land since 1964 and mutation entry to that effect has already been effected. The plaintiffs had not challenged the family arrangement from 1964 till 1993. Based on the material on record, both the courts have accepted the defendants’ case of prior partition. There is concurrent finding of fact by both the courts. In view of the above, there is no substantial question of law in the appeal. Hence, second appeal is dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)