IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2010 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 RP.No. 1091 of 2010() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN CRP.2666/2002 Dated 01/10/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): REVISION PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS ------------------------------------------------------ 1. JANAKI, W/O. NARAYANAN, THAIPURAYIL, CHERAKKAKAM KARA, VARAPUZHA PAKUTHY. 2. SOMAN, S/O. NARAYANAN, DO- 3. T.N. OMANA LILITHAKSHAN, THAIPURAYIL MAROTTICHUVAT, CHERAKKAKAM KARA, VARAPUZHA PAKUTHY. 4. T.N. SAMALA SUDHAKARAN, VATTERIYIL, CHERAKKAKAM KARA, VARAPUZHA PAKUTHY. 5. T.N. JAYAN, THAIPURAYIL, CHERAKKAKAM KARA, VARAPUZHA PAKUTHY. 6. T.N. SABU, DO-DO- BY ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKETESH RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. P.P.RAMADASA SARMA, S/O. PADMANABHA MALLAN, PUTHEN VEETTIL, CHERAKKAKAM KARA, VARAPUZHA PAKUTHY. 2. P.O VOVINDA MALAN, S/O. PADMANABHA MALAN PUTHENVEETTIL, CHERAKKAKAM KARA, VARAPUZHA PAKUTHY. 3. P.P. GOPINATHA SARMA, S/O. PADMANABHA MALAN PUTHEN VEETTIL, CHERAKKAKAM KARA, VARAPUZHA PAKUTHY. 4. T.N. SURESH, THAIPURAYIL, CHERAKKAKAM KARA, VARAPUZHA PAKUTHY. 5. RADHA BHAI, W/O. LATE P.P.RAMDASA SARMA PUTHENVEETTIL, CHERAKKAKAM KARA, VARAPUZHA PAKUTHY. 6. SHYAMALA, D/O. LATE. P.P.RAMDASA SARMA DO-DO- 7. SARALA, D/O. LATE P.P. RAMDASA SARMA DO-DO- 8. HAREENDRA SARMA, S/O. LATE P.P.RAMDASA SARMA, DO-DO- 9. GITENDRA SHARMA, S/0.P.P. RAMDASA SARMA DO DO. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ------------------------ R.P.No.1091/2010 in CRP No.2666 OF 2002 ------------------------ Dated this the 8th day of December, 2010 O R D E R Pius C.Kuriakose, J. This review petition seeks review of our order dated 1/10/2010 by which we confirmed the order of eviction and granted time to the revision petitioners till 31/3/2011 subject to certain conditions. The review petition is directed against the condition No. (i). The above condition was that the entire rent which fell due in respect of the building on 1/11/1982 till 30/9/2010 shall be paid together with consolidated amount of Rs.500/- towards costs apart from interest at the rate of 6% p.a. within one month. The review is sought on the ground that the entire rent ordered to be paid under condition No.(i) is already paid off. In view of the assertion in the review petition, we allow the review petition to the limited extent of clarifying that RP.No.1091/2010 2 condition No.(i) in our order to pay arrears of rent means; “entire arrears of rent as stated in our order less any amount paid by the petitioners against proper receipt or voucher”. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE dpk