IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. L.P.A. No.1110 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: 28.10.2009 Davinder Kumar. -----Appellant Vs. State of Haryana & others. -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Mr. R.L. Batta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Parveen K. Moudgil, Advocate for the appellant. --- ORDER: 1. The appellant challenges order of learned Single Judge, dismissing the writ petition against his repatriation to his parent employer. 2. Learned Single Judge held that once a person is appointed on deputation, there will be no objection to his repatriation. He did not challenge the conditions of appointment. 3. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant states that his appointment on deputation itself was illegal and on that account, repatriation is illegal. LPA No.1110 of 2009 5. We are unable to accept the submission. The appellant did not challenge before learned Single Judge validity of his appointment on deputation. He was appointed in the year 2005 and he joined, knowing fully well that he was being taken on deputation. The order of appointment clearly stated that his appointment was on deputation. This being the position, it cannot now be submitted that appointment on deputation was illegal. 6. We, thus, do not find any ground to interfere with the view taken by the learned Single Judge. 7. The appeal is dismissed. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE October 28, 2009 ( GURDEV SINGH ) ashwani JUDGE 2