THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD CC No.1488 of 2010 ORDER: ( per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed, J ) When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners stated that in spite of the order dated 14-11-2008 passed in WPMP No.32634 of 2008 in WP No.25010 of 2008 by this Court, the 1st respondent herein is proceeding with the work of clearing bushes in the subject land in question and making constructions. On the other hand, learned counsel for the 1st respondent submitted that a Contractor M/s.RK SVEC (JV), Hyderabad, entered into contract with the Commissioner, GHMC for construction of a canal at Balkapur nala (MN4) and in the process clearing the bushes which is abutting the subject land in question. It is further stated that the 1st respondent has no control over the contractor nor he is his agent or party to the proceedings. However, learned counsel for the 1st respondent stated that the 1st respondent is not proceeding with any construction activity in the subject land in question, as alleged by the petitioners. 2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the 1st respondent and inasmuch as the bushes are being cleared as part of the agreement with the GHMC by the contractor, we do not find any contempt and no purpose would be served in continuing these proceedings. The contempt case is, therefore, closed. No order as to costs. _________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J _________________________ G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J Dated 23-12-2011 Nrg