1 CRA-264-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 264 OF 2010 Ajay A. Shukla ... Applicant (Orig. Accused No.3) Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.Rakesh Kumar i/b. Mr. Kamlesh M.Singh,Advocate, for the applicant. Mr.Rashid Khan i/b. A.S.Khan & Associates,Advocates for the respondent No.2. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 15th July, 2010. P.C. 1. The parties have filed an application marked "X" for identification for compounding the case after conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant/respondent No.2 admits that he has received the amount as per the settlement. 2. In view of this, the Revision Application is allowed and the impugned order of conviction and sentence is hereby set aside. The accused are acquitted. 3. As the Revision Application tself is finally disposed of, Application No.146 of 2010 does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)