IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No.2293 of 2011 Date of Decision: 27.09.2011 Smt. Sumitra Devi and another ..... Petitioners Versus State (UT of Chandigarh) ..... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI Present: Mr. Saurav Verma, Advocate, for the petitioners. M.M.S. BEDI, J. Petitioner seeks quashing of charge under Section 304-B IPC. After hearing counsel for the petitioners, it appears that the petitioners have got reasonable defence to rebut the legal presumption. At this stage, no ground is made out for quashing the charge.It will be open to the petitioners to raise all the pleas at appropriate time to seek acquittal or amendment of charge if so warranted by the circumstances. Disposed of. (M.M.S. BEDI) 27.09.2011 JUDGE manju