IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8003 of 2008 Date of Decision: 14.5.2008 Ganpat Rai and another Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.C.PURI Present: Shri H.N.Khanduja, Advocate for the petitioners Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this writ petition qua petitioner No.1 with liberty to file a fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Qua petitioner No.1, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner – Santosh Kumari has laid challenge to the order dated 22.8.2003 (P/4) vide which respondents have decided to withdraw benefit of additional increment earlier granted to her. Further challenge is to the order dated 9.1.2007, vide which, after withdrawing above said benefit, her pay has been re-fixed. To claim relief, Shri Khanduja has placed reliance upon ratio of a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Om Parkash and others v. State of Haryana and others, (CWP No.18601 of 2006), decided on 10.4.2008. Civil Writ Petition No.8003 of 2008 After hearing counsel for the parties, we feel that claim of the petitioner is squarely covered by ratio of the judgment, referred to above. Shri Rathee has failed to show us anything to the contrary. In view of facts mentioned above, this writ petition is allowed in the same terms as in Om Parkash’s case (supra). (Jasbir Singh) Judge May 14, 2008 (K.C. Puri) gk Judge 2