IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 21073 of 2008 Between: T. Chinnayya S/o. Late Yerayya F.P. Shop No. 67-A, Gajula Rega Village, Vizianagaram Town & District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector (Civil Supplies) Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. 3 The Joint Collector, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. 4 Bellanna Sattibabu S/o. Bhaskar Rao Vizianagaram District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more especially one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 3rd respondent FPSAP No. 16/2008/G8 dt. 14-7-2008 as illegal, and unjustiﬁed and unsustainable and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Fair Price Dealer No. 67-A Gajula Rega Village, Vizianagaram Mandal and District forthwith and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a declaration that the order of the third respondent-Joint Collector, Vizianagaram, dated 14-07-2008 in allowing the appeal ﬁled by the fourth respondent herein against the appointment of the petitioner as Fair Price Shop Dealer, as arbitrary and illegal. Though various grounds have been raised by the petitioner assailing the impugned order, I am not inclined to express any opinion on merits, since against the impugned order an eﬃcacious remedy of revision is available before the first respondent. As a matter of fact, the petitioner has already preferred such a revision before the ﬁrst respondent. In the circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the ﬁrst respondent to dispose of the revision petition pending on his ﬁle against the order of the third respondent dated 14-07- 2008 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ___________ G.ROHINI, J 25th September, 2008 NOTE: Furnish C.C. by two days. B/o. SKM