IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2009 / 18TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 34830 of 2007(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- DR.K.MOIDU, RESIDING AT 'SHADE', MALABAR CHRISTIAN COLLEGE, CROSS ROAD, KOZHIKODE-1, MANAGING TRUSTEE KMCT COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING KALLANTHOD, MANASSERY, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SMT.PRABHA R.MENON SRI.M.KRISHNAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. PRIYANKA RAMACHANDRAN, D/O.RAMACHANDRAN P.T., RESIDING AT VANNATHAN VEEDU P.O.ERANHOLY, THALASSERY 670 107, MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER, RAMACHANDRAN.P.T. 2. THE ADMISSION SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PROFESSIONAL COLLEGES, RAM MOHAN PALACE (OLD HIGH COURT BUILDING HALL NO. VIII), ERNAKULAM 3. COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE EXAMINATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SMT.A.PARVATHI MENON FOR R1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SMITHA SUKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.34830 of 2007 ================== Dated this the 8th day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a managing trustee of a trust which runs a college. The 1st respondent got admission to that college through the Commissioner of Entrance Examinations. After four months, in accordance with the higher option, she received admission elsewhere, whereupon she sought refund of certain amounts paid at the time of admission to the petitioner. Since it was not refunded, the 1st respondent approached the 2nd respondent-the Admission Supervisory Committee, who directed the petitioner to refund to the 1st respondent the amounts mentioned in Ext.P3. That order is under challenge before me. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, both parties agreed that on payment of the amounts mentioned in Exts.P3, the 1st respondent would not raise any other contentions or claims against the petitioner in respect of her admission in the petitioner's colleges. Accordingly, recording the above undertaking of the petitioner that the amounts referred to in Ext.P3 would be refunded to the 1st respondent, I close this writ petition holding that all other issues between the petitioner and the 1st respondent stand settled. The amounts as directed in Ext.P3 shall be refunded within one month from today. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2