v^v^' 4- -%• IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BLLASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 3^0^ OF 2004 '^ y <^~ WRJT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 & 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN -APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OFMANDAMUS / CER'nORARI ETC OR DIRECTION(S) / ORDER(S) IN II ". T ^THE LIKE NATURE ETC. ...LMoWa^±_..l.. J Satish Chandra Shrivastava, son of Shri R.L. Shrivastava, aged about 43 years, resident of Shastri Chowk, Kelabadi, Durg. PETITIONER vs 1. High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur Through the Registrar General, High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur. 2. The District & Sessions Judge, Durg. ^ ^1 ^l ^y^ ^....-••y RESPONDENTS XI-HC-22 3TI^T^)T f^TT^3n^T $h^lcb^f?cT Soma ",/cc- ^ <h..;< ^ 3^?!iraT^r, ^JWTS, f^rrey 341<^i M?|ch *iwwgiin^-<—•<.........../^2o<] ;3T^T?;RTTW^T Wrf^TW^^-'te^^F^K ^3T^TT3T^T 11^-2005 Gn a mention being made.|the case is taken up for hearins. Miss Sharmiia Singhai, cotjinsel for the peticoner. Mr. Manindra Shrivastav^, Senior Advocate with Mr. Afroz Khan, Advocate for responctent No.1. Heard both the counsel. The case of the petitioner|is that he was working as Exeeution CSerR In the Court of JudiciaJ Magisfrate.lFirst Class, Dyrg, and on account of certern irreguiarities an inquiry was insti^uted against the peiitioner and in ihat inquiry disciplinary authority imposed a penalty of service, against that order the petiti'oner 'High 00urton2-3-2001. tioner submite that since 2001 the appeal preferred by the petitioner is pe^iding and the same is not being disposed of, in the circumstances, lh©Reg(stry of this Court be djrected to p!ace the appeal before tho appropriato a^thoriiy for decision, at the oariiest. The request made by le^ reasonabte and genuine. The{> apprise the authority regarding | eariy as possibte. With the direction afor< Consequentiy, M.(W.)FJ.No.3064/2004 and IANo.7375/2004 aiso stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for c^rtified copy ofthis order. vide order datecl 22-1-2001, djsmissal of the petitioner from has preferred an appeal before learned counsel for the trned counset for the petitioner appears to be efore, the Registrar General of this Court to ie same so ttiat the appeal is disposed of as id, th®petitlon stands ctisposect of. ^ Sd/- L.C, Bhadoo Judge (^^fa^) A-^ -.