^^ '-> HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGARH: BILASWJR Writ Petition (S) No. 1978 of 2008 Petitioner Resoondents Shobha Ram Kunwar S/o. Shri Tutaram Kunwar, Aged about 38 years, occupation Service, posted as Paiwari, at Halka No.01, Sandra, Tahsil - Bhopalpattanam, Distt.- Dantewada (CG). Versus 1) The State of Chhattisgarh, threugh the Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K..S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2) The Coltector, Dantewada, Distt. Dantewada (CG). 3) Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue), Dantewada, Distt. Dantewada (CG). 4) Tahsildar, Dantev^da, Distt. Etentewada (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution ©fIndia) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Dr. ^njeet Sharma, counsel for ttie petifioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocat®for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 3-4-2008) With consent of teamed counsel appearing for b<^h the parties, the matter is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was posted as Patwari in Patwari Haltai No.1, Sendra Tahsil - Bhopalpattanam, Distt. Dantewada. The petitioner has been transferred to Bastar, Dist. Bastar, by order dated 29-6-2007 (Annexure p/1). _^_--— ^^- j 1 "^ i Raju 3) Learned counsel appearing for ttie petitioner as well as for ttie State/respondente jointly submit that ttie facts and question ©flaw invelved in the petition are the same to that of Writ Petition (S) 5826 of 2007 (Pramod Kumar Bharti Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others), which was dispc^ed of by order dated 14-1-2008. Learned counsel further submits that this petition may be disposed of in the same terms. 4) In view of the above-stated subinission made by leamed counsel appearing for ttie parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same ter»ns i.e., the respondents are directed to make suttable arrangenront wittiin a \ period of four weete for relieving and allowing the petitioner to join his new place of posting, subject to verification of ttie facte. No order asto coste. Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge