IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2011 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 10838 of 2011(D) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- T.R.GANGADHARAN PILLAI , S/O.RAGHAVAN PILLAI, GRA 390, GOUREESAPATTOM, PATTOM PALACE (PO), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.VINOD KUMAR.C RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 001. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.M.K.PUSHPALATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs THOMAS P JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.10838 of 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this 23rd day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner is the de facto complainant in Crime No.82 of 2007 of Medical College Police Station for offence punishable under Sec.420 r/w Sec.34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner preferred a complaint against one Santhosh and Ravikumar alleging commission of the said offence. It is the grievance of petitioner that no fruitful investigation has been conducted by the investigating officer. Thereon, petitioner filed a complaint to the first respondent, the Director General of Police to hand over investigation to some other agency. In this proceeding, it is requested that first respondent may be directed to entrust investigation of Crime No.82 of 2007 of Medical College Police Station to some other agency. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 12.04.2011 learned Public Prosecutor submitted that a refer report has already been submitted before the learned ACJM, Thiruvananthapuram on 14.04.2010. In the light of that submission a report was called from the learned ACJM. Learned ACJM reported that no such report has been submitted on 14.04.2010. I have heard learned counsel for petitioner and W.P(C).No.10838 of 2011 -: 2 :- learned Public Prosecutor. 2. If investigation is completed the investigating officer has to submit appropriate report before the learned ACJM. Learned ACJM has reported that no refer report has been submitted by the investigating officer on 14.04.2010. In that case investigating officer has to submit appropriate report before the learned ACJM and if it is a refer report, learned ACJM has to give notice to the petitioner before proceeding in the matter. Resultantly this petition is disposed of directing investigating officer to submit appropriate report before the learned ACJM, Thiruvananthapuram as early as possible. In case it is a refer report, learned ACJM before proceeding on the same shall give notice of the same to the petitioner. (THOMAS P JOSEPH, JUDGE) Sbna/-