1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT J O D H P U R ::: ORDER In S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.3651/2009 Sajna and anr v. State of Rajasthan ::: Date of Order: 22nd July, 2009 ::: P R E S E N T HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr Rakesh Matoria, for the petitioners Mr Ashok Prajapat, Public Prosecutor for the State ::: By the Court: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the relevant material/case diary made available to me during the arguments of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioners argued that both the accused-petitioners are ladies, they are in jail since 25th June, 2009 and at present they are in judicial custody, therefore, now nothing is to be recovered or investigated from them; hence, they may be released on bail. It is further contended that co-accused Budh Ram @ Madiya has already been released on bail on 16.6.2009 in S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.3125/2009 whereas case of accused-petitioners is on better footing than case of co-accused Budh Ram. 2 of 2 After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I think it just and proper to release the accused-petitioners, namely, 1] Sajna wife of Budh Ram, 2] Shanti Devi wife of Jarnail Singh, presently confined in Central Jail, Sriganganagar on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in F.I.R. No.192/2009, Police Station- Sadulshahar, registered under Secs.224, 225, 332, 353, 143, IPC, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) together with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for their appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. This bail application is allowed accordingly. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. mma