' \ %® HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition .No. S43 of 2305 PETITIQNER : Rajkant Shukla, S/o Late Shri Gangadhar Shulda, aged about 64 years, Ratired Assistani Director of Agriculture, Sitapur, Digtlict Surguja. (CG) At presently address 297/2? Sanjay Nagar, C.0.D. Road, Naini, Aliahabad (UP). VFR§UQ State 0f Chhamsgajh, “Fough: hé necrstary, Depamnent 0f Agicuhm‘e DKS Bhawan Raipur (CG) Staie of Madhya Pradcsh, T‘m‘ough The Secretary, Department of Agrieulture, Vallabh Bhawam Bhopal (MP) The Director, Depamneni of Agiculture, Rajpur (CG). The Director, Department of Agiculture, Bhopal (MP). The Collector, Ambikapur, Districi Surguja (CG). The Deputy Director Department of Agriculture, Amblkapur District Surguja rCG) 51E4OQH5CDw Lag:y4 QQ t9 Ghum)x- \ 7..\ (SB. Hon'ble Nir gatlsn Ix Agmhotrl, J ) Present : None appeam for the petitioger, Shri Salish Gupta, Govt. Ativoeate for the State. E ORAL QRDER Gasser: an are i3“ or Mme, zeoe) On perusal of the papers, it appears that, this petition pertains to payment of retiral benefitS and the same may be resolved by a committee, constituted by the State Government pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 paSSed in WP. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandralear Vs. State Government and others). This Court, in the matter of WP. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Manda! Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other eonnected. matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of the retiral dues as the digputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in WP. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Govennnent and others) and order dated 15.02.2008 passed in WP. No. 1323/2006 (Navin Kumar Bisariya Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) Thus this netltion ts squarely covered bv t e ytdgment and order dated 31“ of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 {Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected matters, as submitted , . . by the learned counsel appearing for the State. A3 xw» T \ This petition is disposed of in the sauna temls i.e‘ the offwe of the Advogate Genaral is directed, to send the ease to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from me date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concerned within a huther period of 15 days The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, alter affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the offteers coneemed. may _ile additional documents, if {r necessam The entire exercise, hieluding payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, be eompleted within a period of four months front the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order, One extra copy of the papers of the petition shall he supplied by the learned eounselfor the petitioner to Shri Satish Gupta, Govt; Advocate, for onward transmission to the committee. sw— ‘ ‘Satish K.Agnihotrif ‘ g Judge A9