IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30978 of 2008 RAMASHANKAR SINGH YADAV @ RAMASHANKAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 6.8.2008 The informant enters appearance by filing vakalatnama. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. As per allegation the petitioner is one of the assailant of the deceased. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant submitted that evidence of all the public witnesses is over and now the case is pending only for evidence of police officer. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that there is no consistent evidence of the prosecution witnesses on the point of alleged occurrence. He submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 12.1.2007. It appears that the petitioner’s prayer for bail was earlier rejected by this Court on 19.12.2007 in Cr.Misc.no. 33761 of 2007. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I am not inclined to take a different view in the matter. The prayer is refused. The court below is directed to dispose of the case of the petitioner as early as possible preferably within six months from 2 the date of receipt or communication of this order. If the case is not so disposed of, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. Al (M.Saran,J)