IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.288 of 2006 BINOD KUMAR BHAGAT @ BINOD BHAGAT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 5.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as State. This revision application has been filed against the order dated 7th January, 2006 passed by Ist Additional Sessins Judge, Banka in Cr.Appeal No.51 of 2005 whereby the order of conviction and sentence passed by Shri A.P.Gupta, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Banka in G.R. No.521 of 1991/ Tr. No.12 of 2005 has been affirmed. The learned Magistrate convicted the accused persons under sections 379, 411 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. However, he released the accused-petitioner on entering into a bond of Rs.5,000/- for two years with one surety for keeping good behaviour and peace. On perusal of judgments of both the courts below, it appears that there is concurrent finding of sentence against the petitioner The petitioner has already been given the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner admitted that probation bond has already been executed by the petitioner and the period of probation has expired. In the circumstances, this court is not inclined to interfere with the order in question under the revisional jurisdiction. Accordingly, the revision application is dismissed at the admission stage itself. Md.S. (Ghanshyam Prasad,J.)