IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2820 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:10.05.2011 M/s Amar Tex Industries Limited and its Associates and sister concern, 365, Amar Tex House, Phase-1, Industrial Area, Panchkula (Haryana) through its General Mamager. . . .Petitioner Versus Animesh Tyagi and others . . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.S.S. Virk, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) CM No.12197-CII-2011 Application is allowed as prayed for. CR No.2820 of 2011 (O&M) This revision petition is directed against order passed by the Rent Controller dated 07.02.2011 by which evidence of the petitioner/tenant has been ordered to be closed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that if one more opportunity is granted, he would complete his entire evidence, at his own risk and responsibility, subject to payment of heavy cost. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the fact that the next date fixed before the Court below is 1.6.2011 for rebuttal and arguments and also that the petitioner could not lead his evidence because of the negligence on the part of the manager of the company, revision petition is allowed and order dated 07.02.2011 is hereby set aside. Petitioner is granted one last opportunity to lead his entire evidence on 1.6.2011, at his own risk and responsibility, subject to payment of `15000/- as costs which shall be paid to the respondent/landlord personally in the Court. It is made clear that this order is peremptory and in case the cost is not paid then the present revision petition shall be deemed to be dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MAY 10, 2011 JUDGE Vivek