IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48543 of 2008 SURENDRA CHOUDHARY @ SATYENDRA PRASAD CHOUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 16/12/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under Sections- 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 409 AND 120B/34 of I.P.C. The submission is that co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No.44021/08. The petitioner is stated to be the Branch Manager of a bank, holding the status of a trustee. The allegations are of fraudulent withdrawals from the account of an account holder in his branch without his consent, thereby causing him pecuniary loss. This aspect of the matter does not appear to have been considered in aforesaid Cr. Misc. No.44021/08 while granting anticipatory bail. This Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail in the facts and circumstances of the case merely on principles of consistency. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail shall be 2 considered by the court below on its own merits, without being prejudiced by the present order. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)