THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 23438 OF 2011 DT.19.08.2011 Between: K.Kumar … Petitioner And The Commissioner, Endowment Department, Hyderabad & others … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri P Sajan Kumar Counsel for respondents 1 & 2: Govt. Pleader for Endowments Counsel for respondent no.3 : Sri Ch.Satish Kumar The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 23438 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner feels aggrieved by the proceedings No. L.Dis.No.A2/19886/04 dated 26.5.2004, through which the Commissioner of Endowments/first respondent deferred the appointment of the petitioner as Computer Operator in Sri Raja Rajeswara Swamy Devasthanam, Vemulawada. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned counsel for respondents. The petitioner appears to have made a representation dated 2.4.2011 to the third respondent with a request to appoint him as a Computer Operator. The nature of steps that have been taken is not clear. From a perusal of the proceedings dated 26.5.2004, it is evident that the third respondent appointed the petitioner as Computer Operator through proceedings dated 18.12.2003 and same was submitted to the first respondent for approval. May be, with a view to verify the matter further, the first respondent issued proceedings dated 26.5.2004 directing that appointment of the petitioner be deferred. More than six years have elapsed, the petitioner is not able to find out as to whether a clear vacancy exists in the post of Computer Operator in third respondent devasthanam or the manner in which he is appointed. Under these circumstances, this Court cannot direct the third respondent to appoint the petitioner as a Computer Operator. However, as and when steps are initiated for filling such a post, the case of the petitioner deserves to be considered. In case there exist a post of Computer Operator in the third respondent devasthanam and steps are initiated to fill the same, the case of the petitioner shall be considered duly taking into consideration the experience, if any, he gained vis-à-vis the said post. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J DATE: 19.08.2011 TVK THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 23438 OF 2011 DT.19.08.2011