HIGH COURT OF CHHARTTISGARH AT BILASPUR Hon’ble Shri Dhirenclra Mishra & Hon’ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar, JJ Comm:- Writ Petition [Habeas Corpus) No.6314 of 2009 Petitioner : Smt Bindu Gurjar, wife of Paras Ram, aged about 3O years, Occupation Service, Resident of Village Kharra, Pclice Station Odgi, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (CG) Versus Respondents : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) The Superintendent of Police, District Koriya (CG) N The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Surajpur, District Surguja (CG) The Station House Officer, Police Station Kelhari, District Koriya (CG) Paras Ram Gurjar, Son of Lallu Lal Gurjar, aged about 33 years Amit Gurjar, Son of Paras Ram Gurjar, aged about 5 years Pushparaj Gurjar, Son of Paras Ram Gurjar, aged about 7 years, Respondent No.6 and 7 through guardian father respondent No.5 Paras Ram Gurjar. Respondents No.5 to 7 are resident of \Village Chanwaridand, Police Station Kelhari, Tahsil Manendragarh, District Koriya (CG) Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in'the nature of Habeas Corpus Present: Shri A.K. Shukla, counsel for the petitioner. Shri U.N.S. Deo, G.A. for the State. w&0)U1J~ Oral Order (Passed on 4“ of November, 2009) The petitioner has tiled this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia for issuance of writ of habeas corpus and has prayed for the following reliefs:- A. “The Hon‘ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents Police Cfficers to produce the minor children respondent No.6 and 7 along with respondent No.5 and looking to lhe welfare of the minor children their custody and kindly be handed over to the petitioner with. appropriate direction." “That, a command/direction may kindly be issued alternatively to consider and decide the: application of the petitioner under Section 97 and 98 of the Cr.P.C. pending before the respondent No.3.” “Any other relief, as it may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case along with cost of the petition.” (2) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing this petition with respect to relief (A). However, he prays for a 29.1 1 .2007. (3) Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to‘ the respondent No.3-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Surajpur, District alreadyW; decided. i “K Sd/— #W l Dhirendra s — Misi11;a " t V 1 i i i RN. CHANDRAKAR ‘ Judge