In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-27685 of 2009 (O&M) Makhan Singh ..... Petitioner vs State of Punjab ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present Mr. Surinder Grag, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. R. K. Girdhar, Advocate, for the complainant. Rajesh Bindal J. The factum of petitioner's joining investigation is disputed by learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he had tried to contact the petitioner but had been able to talk to his brother who was asked about the fact. His brother stated that the petitioner has gone for joining investigation and he was not allowed to mark presence. However, the petitioner did not contact him even after a call to his brother. Considering the aforesaid fact where the petitioner does not seem to be interested in the case, I do not find any merit in the present petition. The same is accordingly dismissed. 16.11.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge