IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35543 of 2010 HARENDRA RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 15.11.2010 As prayed for, by learned counsel for the petitioner, he is permitted to correct the prayer portion of the bail petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Admittedly, except Section 384 and 379 of the I.P.C. almost all the Sections are bailable in nature, so far as Section 379 is concerned, the same is against co-accused Sashikant Tiwari and the aforesaid offence is not applicable against the petitioner. Admittedly, neither petitioner nor co-accused Sashikant Tiwari took any amount from the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that charge sheet has already been filed against co-accused Sashikant Tiwari whereas investigation against this petitioner is still pending and moreover, the case has already been compromised between the parties. Considering the aforesaid submission, petitioner, namely, Harendra Rai, in the event of his arrest/surrender within thirty days from the date of communication of this order to the concerned court in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 145 of 2003 (Tr. No. 4836 of 2009), shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Muzaffarpur subject to 2 condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)