•An..' IN THE HIGH COURT OF TUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH M.r-.r'- s'^-1 / 2ft(-lR WW^ BBQCI APPLICANTS PLAINT!FI;S /" ^ KESPONDENT •i/TVr'TIT^-T^^T^r A BsT-^- L^ ri-r Fii'iy IJAIN i ^l..y 4. Pila Sineh S/o. Late Ram Prasad Ageu about34 years, Uils Sing-h: £l/o.Lsts -R^in Pr^&sd, A^ed -sbout 25 V&3.FS; A^crArmAti S/n l-ate RAm iJr?.GAd '£i- ' Aged abaat 33 years, Uxmariiya Wd/o. Late Mangal Sai, /\_wt'i S,rif~1JSf ^n v?s.:dF'5_ All ^bove sre R/Q. Villsge Chhir^d.kslo/ P.S. Darima,- Tah. Ansbik.apni:- Distt. Surguia (C^G.) VCKRITR ^Sueri Bai Wd/'o. Ute Mohari, Aeed about 59 vears, 'Caste Kanwar, Occup&Gon H-ouse Vvife/ K/o. yill&ge rWvinrikal,. PC Dari.na Tah-il [lo, r.3. uanHia, AmbikaF-ur. Di&tt. Sureuia (C.G.) APPLICATION U/S. 1S1 OF C.P.C FOR RE^TC'RATION OF THE SECOND APPEAL N0- 417/05. DISMIRSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION r XI-HC-22 -^sf -iiiAiidti, ^dSy'iio, ferray 3Il^T'?iI l^'t^'STi^ WTWHftn 14.12.2005: Shri V.A. Goverdhan couns|el for the applicants Heard. This M.C.C has been fileej 417/2005 which was dismissedfot Learned counsel for the apt>licants called for the first timethe counsei for pass over. However, when it counsel could not appear as he duly supported by affidavit. For the reasons stated iri Second Appeal whichwas dismis^ is restored to its original number. q>piRrat';i'WR?[ •it fezt ^fsre ^73)f:OT3lI^I for restoration of gecond Appeal No. non prosecution on 2.12.2005. submits that when the case was for the appellants appeared and prayed again calted in the second round, the Ivas busy in other Gourt. This M.C.C is wlas the application it is allowed and the (ed on 2.12.2005 for want of prosecution Sd/- Dhu-endra Mishra! Judge