IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Regular Second Appeal No. 2819 of 2005 (O&M) Date of Decision : January 8, 2008 Dharmi and others ... Appellants Versus Bittu and others. .. Respondents CORAM : Hon`ble Mr. Justice Pritam Pal. Present : Shri Sanjay Gupta, Advocate, for the appellants. Shri Sarju Puri, Advocate, for the Caveator/respondent No.1 PRITAM PAL , J. This regular second appeal, by plaintiffs, is directed against the judgment and decree dated 22.11.2003 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nawanshehr, whereby suit for permanent injunction, restraining the defendant-respondents from forcibly dispossessing them (plaintiff/plaintiffs) or raising any type of construction in the plot, shown in red colour in the site-plan, attached with the plaint, was dismissed. Thereafter, appeal filed by the plaintiffs was also dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge, Nawanshahr vide judgment and decree dated 13.12.2004. Without going into any further details, suffice it to say that the plaintiffs had filed a suit for permanent injunction pertaining to the plot in dispute claiming therein that the said plot was allotted to Sucha Ram, their predecessor-in-interest by the Gram Panchayat of Village Rehpa, Tehsil and District Nawanshahar and that they were in possession. But, they Regular Second Appeal No. 2819 of 2005 (2) .. (plaintiffs) have failed to establish the allotment of the plot in favour of said Sucha Ram and even they could not prove their possession over the said plot. In this regard, both the courts below have given concurrent findings. Learned counsel for the appellants could not point out any discrepancy in the evidence led by the defendants in that behalf. Not only that, learned counsel for the appellants also could not make out any substantial question of law for consideration in this appeal, by this Court. In this view of the matter, this appeal is hereby dismissed in limine. [ PRITAM PAL ] January 08, 2008. JUDGE som