Vs HON'BLE S.B. r. IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^-CcT CONTEMPTCASE No. ~ 7 O /2011 PETITIONER: Praveer Chandra Khetwar, S/o Late Shri Markandeya Satnami, Aged about 31 years, R/o Danteshwari Ward No. 20, Old Sarab Bhatti Road, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENTS/ JCONTEMNERS: ^ ^ ^ ^./' /! r -Z // ^ ^^•'....« 1. Mr M. K. Raut, Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of PubIicWorks, Ministry, D.K.S. Building, Raipur, C.G. 2. Mr Manohar Singh Paraste, Collector, District Bastar, Jagdalpur, C.G. 3. Mr. Gyaneshwar Kashyap, Superintendent Engineer, Public Works Department, Bastar Circle, District Bastar, Jagdalpur, C.G. 4. Mr. D. K. Netam, Executive Engineer, Public Works Department/ North Bastar Division, District Bastar, Jagdalpur, C.G. CONTEMPTPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THECONTEMPT OF COURT ACT. ^n^T-^T 'f^n^s^ 5h^i<=ti ^f^a Deepti ^^ ^WM^, ^Tl1^^<o. [^crlKriy STTif^T -q?r^. ^..^W.....^.^il^5-^/u ^ WWr(T5h^i<^ 'fN^ST' STI^I'^rr^ ^Tfin SB : Hon'bie Shri l^/ianindra Mohbn Shrivastava. JS 24-02-2011 Shri Aiok Dewangan, counsdl Learned counsei for the pej passea an order on 30/09/10 in VV.| by the Deputy Coliector on beh^ respondents therein to consider appropriate order within three mor order, the concerned authority i.e| orders within three months from t? further submits that the represent^tion submitted in the inward office df thereafter, no orders have been pa^s The documents fiied aiong receipt in the office of Superint^nding Learned counsel for the petitioner of representation bearing acknowl^jgement are no spedfic pleadings in this p^tition and knowiedge of the Coitector not the petitioner approached or met t^ bringing to his notice, the order Therefore, a? this stage, respondent. However, the petitiorter the Coliector and bring to his noti^ that he is under an obiigation and this Court. pas^ed <=M^I<n<flr1 tnH^Tf ^ ftlzt <f^^l< ^T'3:Tf;<R ^TT^T for the petitioner. titioner submits that even though thisCourt .ip.(S) No;5733/07, quashing the order passed II? o? the Coiiector with a direction to the itte case of the petitioner afresh and pass (ths from fhe date of receipt of copy of the the Coiiector has not passed appropriate te date of receipt of copy of the order. He aiong with the copy o? the order was District Coiiector on 14/10/10 but even i^sed. ^ith the petition shovy's acknowiedgement of Engineer and Executive Engineer. however shown to the Court another copy in the office of the Collector. There to show that it has come to the notice is there any averment as to on which date, ie Collector for redressal of his grievance by bythisCourt. am not inciined to issue notice to the >rter may submit his representation directiy to )e, the order passed by this Court informing cjuty bound to decide the matter as directed by "—"£.'"'"""