J X3'?^~TTT ^i~%TTTST' .r^T7 •STm.T.r-' a. rTTTTFBr7 A 'T E^TT. A g;r*TTTS Irzi^ll i^vJSJKI l^i-JJJ^/lt^i UKc^AJ, blL^.^i'DIv 'T_TTT ^ T^T?£'/~' A 7?7T Li-Lf^. x Jt i3>5 M.A. N0. ? ?? z~Tfi005 TS : 1] Naseeniun Nisto Vv/o. Mohd. Sajjak, '• AgedabQUt32yeais. <&] Ziyaul Hak S/o. Mohd. Sajjak, Aged abost ISyears. ^v s-» ?T ^ v^ \^f^ M^ wv/ /^/ /J -•«' rf ,-• ?'jy 'is.k S/ o. Ivlohd-. Sftjjsk/ Aged about 15 years. 41 Shabnam Nisha D/o. Mohd. Sajj'ak, Aged about 33 years. ^j' ShaAja Nisha (Rakhi) D/o. Mohd. Sajjak, Agedaboutllyears. 6] Gulnaz (Neha) D/o. Mohd. Sajj'ak, Aged about 9 years. 7] Shagupta (Shiva) S/o. Mohd. Sajjak, Aged about 7 years. Appellant No.3 to 7 are minor, toough thetr guardiaji- inothei" appeSast No.2 Naseemun Nisha W/o. Mohd. Sajjak. All R/o. 'Kfaarsiya Chowk, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) SPONDENTS : 1] ^ 2] VERSUS Sanj'ay Singh S/o. Shambhu Singh, Aged about 35 years, R/o. Kedarpur, Ambikapur, S'jrguja (C.G.) The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Branch Ambikapur, Surguj'a (C.G.) ArPEAL UNDER SECTION. 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT " unM'i . I-M.QUb&USX .A. No.132/2001 Vs Naseemun Nisha&others SanjaySingh&another Mr AAanojParaniBe.Advocatefortheapoellanfs. forrespondentNo.l. .; :SK OifiTsu^ AuVGCGTS T^F ent No.2. Sifs aaainst the impugned *a-.^. t.: Heard.; :' •.,'/:/:. :::;;;; •••1 -: '. 2. The dpDellants have.filedthis miscellaneous dt awar3 dcited'01.12.2004 possecj by the lear'nscl; 4^ Addit'bhal AAotor, Claims Tribunal, Ambikapur (for short *the tribunar') in Claim Cose No.08/03 dismissina'i'he claim petjfioh oftheclajniants/Qppellantsherein.i-lowever.the tribunnl has pirotect-ed the.refund of Rs.50,000/-' paid to the claimants towai-ds'no'fault ligbilitv', • ' ' ' : . : : 3. Brief facts of fhe case are that the aoDellants hdve filed a claim Defition befope the trjbunal seeking comDensatidn:'to the turie of Rs,50,OQJ30Q/-:.on; the ground thfft they were the dependents, of the deceiKecf AAobto Sajjak, who was hygband and fafher'offhe claimcmts.respectivd^^ ; o road accidertf on.25.12/2pQ2 when :he was ret 4. Theffibynal, on the basis offhe pleadings of the Dcrties, frcimedVas mQfev:ds' six is^ues and: afl-er affording ooporturfity of hearing to 'the. D dddace evidence in supporf:ofttheirTespectiveiCMes,dJSfflissedth^ case^ofthe.apoellanteyideimRUgned.'nwaFd^on.th^ himself WQS .resoonsjble for the dceidenf <is tie; waSi drivmg 1-he ' •', negljgent.mainner..' '.•;,;. .,.::,','':.::''. ;'':'^:~ •' ^ ' . ,;':;:.-•••'.'''. IHlT Rfishan/- :'-2 Vl(e 'have heard leamed; 'counsel for fhe parfies^^^c^ award as also records of thetribunal below. On careful ScrutinY of the record.we are of the opinion that the claimants have not beenable to Drove their case by adducinft the evidence thot ;the accident was not the result of nealiaence on fhe Darit' of the deceasedj Even the person who was traveling along ifl/ith the deceased in thesaid jeep at the time of the accident has not been examined. Therefore. the tribunal hasl not committed any mistake in Bdssing the irnpugned awdrd dismissing their claim Detition. '7. In the result, the ippeal has i dismissed and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge o substance, the same deserves tol be No order ds to costs, Sd/- li K. Agarwal ^ Judge