IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 6TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 15TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 24346 of 2011(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. KAILASNATH K.G., S/O GOVINDANKUTTY K.N., AGED 21 YEARS, KUTTATH HOUSE, KODANNUR P.O., THRISSUR 2. JEFF VARGHESE S/O C.M.VARGHESE, AGED 22 YEARS, CHALISSERY HOUSE, BHAGHEERATHI NAGAR, OLLUKARA P.O., THRISSUR 3. RANJITH M.M., S/O MUKUNDAN M.K. AGED 24 YEARS, MARATH HOUSE, CHENAM P.O., CHERPU, THRISSUR 4. DINIL DOLPHY M. S/O DOLPHY M.V., AGED 23 YEARS, MUNDOKARAN HOUSE, AYYANTHOLE P.O. THRISSUR BY ADV. SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM SC SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 24346 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 25.8.11 EXT.P2- A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 25.8.11 EXT.P3- A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER DATED 25.8.11 EXT.P4- A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER DATED 25.8.11 (True copy) P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).24346/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 6th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of 8th semester B.Tech 'Electrical and Electronics' Engineering Degree Examination vide Exts.P1 to P4 applications and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within ten weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs