32 1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.678/2009 Maduram Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of Order :: 4th March 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.Bheemkant Vyas, for the petitioner Mr.Anand Purohit, Additional Advocate General. The petitioner having ordered to be detained under the provisions of the Rajasthan Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 2006 by the orders dated 06.10.2008 (Annex.1) and dated 21.11.2008 (Annex.4), has filed this writ petition questioning his detention; and herein notices were ordered to be issued on 29.01.2009. The learned Additional Advocate General has filed a reply on behalf of the respondents. On the matter being taken up for admission today, learned counsel for the petitioner frankly submitted that the petitioner shall stand advised not to proceed with this writ petition any further and to make appropriate representation before the authorities concerned and to take resort to appropriate remedies in accordance with law; and seeks to withdraw this writ petition with such liberty for the petitioner. The learned Additional Advocate General submits that if any appropriate representation is made, the same would be given due consideration in accordance with law by the authorities concerned. 2 Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the submissions so made, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw; and this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty for the petitioner of taking resort to appropriate remedies in accordance with law including making of appropriate representation to the authorities concerned. Needless to say that if any representation is made by the petitioner, the same would be considered expeditiously and without delay by the authorities concerned. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. s.soni