; E ? T“ F‘r§ff7%«§ @ @ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR of Wig WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1 1 (b I OF 2011 PETITIONER / M. R. Kashyap, aged about 58 years, S/o late Shri N. R. Kashyap, occupation — service, presently posted as Station House Officer, Police Station Chandrapur District Janjgir— Champa, Chhattisgarh VERSUS RESPONDENTS /’1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Home (Police), D.K.S‘ Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh gQéN/ CWWM n51; ......... /'3. Raipur, Chairman, Chhattisgarh Poiice Establishment Board; /. 4. inspector General of Police (Administration) Police Headquarters, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5. Superintendent of Police, District Janjgir— Champa, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS OR THE LIKE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTSGARH I BILASPUR W WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 1281 OF 2011 PETEHON ER MR. Kashyap Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Othet’s (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri RS‘Marhas, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate Generai for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on a“ day of March, 201 1) 1. Heard iearn’ed oounsei for the parties. 2. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been transferred about eight times within a period of 2 1/2 years; thus, the petitioner suffers from frequent transfers, which is against the provisions prescribed in Section 14 of the Chhattisgarh .Poiioe Act, 2007’ (forshort “the Act, 2007”). 3. Ee that as it may. teamed counsei appearing for the State submits that in view of the provisions of Section 22 (2) (b) of the Act, 2007, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the Police Estabiishment Board (for short “the Board) pointing out the difficuities faced by the petitioner. 4. in view of the above, it a representation is made by the petitioner within a period of one week, the same may be considered and decided, in accordance with iaw and on its own merits, as eariy as possibie preferabiy within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, it is made ciear that in the event, the petitioner has not been relieved from the present place of posting, he may not be relieved till his representation is considered and decided by the Board. Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNH'IORI Judge ashok