HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition {C} N0. 5 1 8 of2009 PETITIONER : Narayan Prasad Pandey, Age about 64 year, S/o late Shridhan Prasad Pandey R/o village Badgaon, Post Godhi Tahsil Raipur, Thana Kharora Distt. Raipur (CG). RESPONDENTS : l. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Depamnent ot‘Revenue, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : VERSUS 2. The Coliector Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG). 3. The Tahsildar Raipur Distt. Raipur (CG). Shri Somkant Venna, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, Panel Lawyer for the State. With the consent Qfthe parties. the matter is taken up for hearing tinally. .The petitioner, by this petition, tiled under Article 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia, seeks a direction to the respondents for allotment of five acres of ' land as per amended policy oftheVState Government. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was soldier in the Infantry Division of the Indian Army and he retired on 01.12.1978 after rendering service of 15 years. He applied for allotment of land as per the policy ofthe State Government to the Collector, Raipur. His application was duly recommended by the District Sainik Welfare Officer, Raipur. However his application has not been considered till date despite ' #7 repeated reminders. ORAL ORDER {Passed onTM 23 day of January, 2309) ..\ He further subunts that tins petmon may be dlsposed of wnh a d1rect1on to the respondent No 2 to take decision on his applicatxon for allotment of land 1n accordance w1th law Wlthm a specified period, to which learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection. Alter due consideration, it is directed that the petitionervshall make a representation before the respondent No. 2 for the reliefs which have been claimed in this petition, and on such representation being tiled, the same shali be dec1ded by the respondent No 2 within a period of tour months from the date of receipt of representation 1n accordance With law With the above direction, this petition stands disposed of: No order asto COSt$. {xx Sd/— ' Satish K Agnihotri Judge