MC 2854/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. BARUAH. Heard Mr. K.K. Bhatta, learned counsel for the applicant. Office note dated 14-12-2010 indicates service of notice on the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Despite such service of notice neither of them appears today nor seeks for adjournment of the matter to a future date. In view of the above, this court is constraint to dispose of the matter in absen tia of the respondents. This application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is preferred for co ndoning the delay of 105 days in preferring the connected appeal against the jud gment and award dated 22-12-2006 passed by the Commissioner, Workmen’s Compensat ion, Kamrup in W.C Case No. 268 of 2003 The grounds of delay are incorporated in the petition, which are meticulously pe rused and found cogent and sufficient. In view the grounds contended in the application, this court finds no impediment to condone the delay of 105 days. Delay is condoned accordingly. Misc. case stands disposed of.