1 ndm 73 cra.951.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 951 OF 2010 Smt. Cellen Joseph Fernandes and ors. ... Applicants Vs. Vivek Narayan Kalbhag and ors. ... Respondents ------ Ms. Radhika Thakkar i/b P.M.Havnur for the Applicants. Mr. Prabhakar Shetty for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. ------ CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 23 rd November, 2010. P.C. 1 The learned counsel appearing for the Applicants on instructions states that the Applicants are not pressing the revision application on merits and they may be granted time of atleast two years to vacate the suit premises. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents opposed the said prayer. 2 The Applicants have made a statement that they are not pressing revision application on merits. Hence, the decree will attend finality. The suit premises are business premises. Considering all these aspects, time to vacate till 31 st October, 2012 deserves to be granted. 2 3 Hence following order is passed: I. Revision application is dismissed as not pressed with no order of costs. II. Notwithstanding the dismissal of the revision application, the decree for possession shall not be executed till 31 st October, 2012 subject to Applicants and all adult members of their family filing usual undertakings to vacate the suit premises. III. If undertakings are not filed in this Court within four weeks from today, the decree for possession will become forthwith executable. IV. Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order. [ A.S.OKA, J ]