In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. C.W.P. No.136 of 1988 Date of Decision: 29.11.2007. Nirmal Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Lal Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents No.1 and 2. RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 states that the petitioner is already in service of respondents and he has filed an affidavit that he does not want to pursue the present petition. Since no one has appeared for the petitioner for the last two hearings, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge November 29, 2007 “DK”