VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 1619 OF 2008 Rajabhai H. Parmar Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Ors. Respondents Mr. Sandeep V. Marne, for the Petitioner. Mr. Chetan Agarwal, for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, & A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 30, 2008. PC :- 1. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking two reliefs - (i) to quash the order of suspension; and (2) to direct the respondents to pay full salary and allowances from 22-3-2002 onwards, by treating the period from 22-3-2002 onwards as period spent on duty. 2. During the course of hearing of the petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent produced a communication, showing the revocation of the suspension, which is dated 24th September, 2008. The first relief therefore, no longer survives. 3. The few facts as set out in the petition are that, the petitioner was dismissed on 22nd March, 2002. The petitioner was acquitted of the criminal - 2 - charge on 7th May, 2002. On 4th February, 2002 the order of dismissal was set aside and the petitioner was reinstated in the service and placed under suspension. The suspension has not been revoked till filing of the petition. 4. Considerig the above, this petition can be disposed of by giving following directions- (a) Consequent to the order of reinstatement, the respondent is directed to pass the orders, in the matter of wages for the period from 22-3-2002 to 3-10-2007. (b) The entire exercise be carried out in 8 weeks, considerig the fact that the charge-sheet was pending, the issue regarding treating the period from 4-10-2007 till disposal of the Disciplinary Proceeding as duty period, will be decided by the Disciplinary Authority, on the conclusion of this petition. 5. With these above directions, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- [ F.I. REBELLO, J.] Sd/- - 3 - [ A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.]