BA-I No. 780 of 2008 Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant submits before this Court that it has been indicated in para 4 of the Supplementary Affidavit dated 27.11.2008 that the evidence of seven prosecution witnesses has been recorded in the trial court and their statements have been annexed alongwith the Supplementary Affidavit. It was further submitted that the involvement of the present applicant has not been stated in the evidence of seven prosecution witnesses. Perusal of the record reveals that first bail application moved before the trial court was rejected on 23.07.2008 and by now the statements of seven prosecution witnesses have been recorded after rejection of bail by the Sessions Judge. Considering the above, it would be just and proper for the applicant to move a bail application before the trial court on the basis of the evidence of seven prosecution witnesses which has been recorded and the trial court may consider all the facts and circumstances of this case and decide the bail application afresh without being prejudice of filing the present bail application before this Court. The bail application of the applicant is disposed of accordingly. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 24.12.2008 LSR