( 1 ) cria3235.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3235 OF 2011 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant Versus Dnyandeo Laxman Zambre .. Respondent Mr. B.J. Sonawane, A.P.P. for applicant/State. Mr. Y.V. Bhide, Advocate for sole respondent. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3471 OF 2011 Santosh s/o. Ramesh Tanwade .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. M.P. Tripathi h/f. Mr. R.R. Chandak, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. B.J. Sonawane, A.P.P. for respondent/State. Mr. Y.V. Bhide, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 15.11.2011 P.C. :- 1. Heard learned advocates for both sides. Bail came to be granted by the Additional Sessions Judge-6, ( 2 ) cria3235.11 Ahmednagar, vide order dated 18.06.2011 in Cri. Misc. Application No. 755 of 2011. By these two applications said bail order is sought to be cancelled. Learned A.P.P. Mr. Sonawane appearing on behalf of the State and learned advocate Mr. Tripathi h/f. Mr. Chandak have taken taken me through the record and in particular the statements of Sukhdeo as well as his son Gorakh, who have stated in their statements that they had noticed present applicant running over their house late in the night and thereafter they were informed that alleged incident taken place near house of Sonabai. According to learned advocate for the applicant, these two statements were of vital importance and the learned Additional Sessions Judge has declined to give appropriate weightage to these two statements and proceeded to grant the bail. 2. It is required to be noted that the aforesaid case is of circumstantial evidence. The stand of present applicant that the circumstance, may be applicant running ( 3 ) cria3235.11 away from one end of the road to other and watching of the same by those two persons by itself does not bring said respondent-Dnyandeo close to the commission of offence and as such the argument that bail order should be cancelled cannot be accepted. One such incident said to have been quoted by the applicant in Criminal Application No. 3471 of 2011 and it is alleged that threats were administered for which complaint was lodged with the concerned police station. I am not very much impressed by the allegations. Both these applications are required to be rejected. 3. The Criminal Applications are rejected. If in future the respondent/Dnyandeo violates terms of his bail, appropriate person can make application for cancellation of his bail. [R.Y. GANOO, J.] snk/2011/NOV11/cria3235.11