IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 5TH JUNE 2009 / 15TH JYAISHTA 1931 RP.No. 485 of 2009() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN DBP.11/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------------ COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP,SC,COCHIN D.B RESPONDENT(S)/APPLICANT: ---------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. LAKSHMI NARAYAN. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P. No.485 of 2009 in D.B.P. No.11 of 2008. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 5th day of June, 2009. ORDER Raman, J, In D.B.P. No.11 of 2008 sanction was accorded to the petitioner herein for appointing a reputed person as Commissioner. This was done after getting report from the Ombudsman. However, the incumbent was not appointed. The Government in the meantime had deputed Additional Secretary, Devaswom as the Commissioner of Cochin Devaswom Board, to which course the petitioner has no objection and it even seeks for a review of the earlier order passed. If the petitioner did not want to appoint an independent person, there is no necessity for them to approach this court and spent the valuable time of this court. In the circumstances, since the petitioner himself R.P.485/2009. 2 seeks the review accepting the steps taken by the Government in this regard, we allow the review petition and the order in D.B.P.11 of 2008 is recalled. Report No.4 will be deferred for consideration of the remaining matters to another date. P.R. Raman, Judge P. Bhavadasan, Judge sb.