IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9639 of 2002 1.GULDHARI PRASAD S/O Late Lal Dev Prasad a resident of the village-Sadarpur P.O.+P.S. Barhariya, District Siwan, Presently, working on the post of the Headmaster at primary School Bhatwalia, P.S. Pachrukia District Siwan. 2.Devnath Pandit s/o Late Shivpoojan Pandit a resident of village Noorchapra P.O.+P.S. Barhariya District Siwan, presently working on the post of a Primary School teacher (Assistant Teather) at primary school Ukhai District Siwan. 3.Ramagya Prasad Singh s/o Phagu Singh a resident of the village P.O. +P.S. Barhariya District Siwan. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary. 2.The District Superintendent of Education Siwan, District Siwan. 3.The District collector, Siwan. ----------- 3 21/6/2010 No one appears for the petitioners. Counsel for the State is present. Counsel for the State very fairly submits that the grievance of the petitioners in this writ application as sought to be canvassed by way of paragraph no.1 of the writ application reading as follows:- “That this writ application in the nature of a writ of mandamus is being filed at this Hon’ble court for the issuance of a direction/directions to all the respondents in general and the respondent no.3 in particular to pay the arrears of the increased pay scale of the petitioners since 5.4.87 (Rs.1400- Rs.2600) in pursuant to the office order dt. 13.8.2001 contained in the office Memo No.1917 and due to the non-implementation of the said office order the petitioners have got aggrieved of not getting their arrears of their increased scale despite of the fixation of their amended pay scale, vide the abovesaid office order dt. 13.4.2001 contained in memo No.1917 as an annexure annexed to this writ application.” has been found to be correct by the respondents and 2 recommendation was also made for release of the amount. He also submits that such stand taken in the counter affidavit has not been denied by the petitioners and therefore he has reasons to believe that grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. As the respondents do not dispute claim of the petitioners as raised in the writ application and intend to make payment of the admissible amount, therefore if the payment to the petitioners has not been made till date, the same must be paid to the petitioners within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforementioned observation/direction this application is disposed of. Abhay Kumar ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)