THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.18929 of 2010 Date: 07.09.2010 Between: M/s. Sai Venkata Pavan Constructions & Bore Wells, Chittoor. ..... Petitioner AND The Superintending Engineer, Kadapa and others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri L.J. Veera Reddy Counsel for Respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj The Court made the following: ORDER: The short and simple grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that having entered into a contract and issued a work order undertaking to handover site for execution of the work covered by the contract, the respondents have not been handing over the site. The petitioner is stated to have made a representation dated 26.07.2010 to respondent No.1 requesting for handing over site. The petitioner pleaded that neither the site is handed over nor the representation of the petitioner has been disposed of. Ordinarily a writ petition cannot be maintained for enforcement of a concluded contract. Handing over site is a term of contract. If one of the contracting parties fail to perform the term of contract, the aggrieved party is entitled to avail the common law remedies. However, without adjudicating on the dispute raised by the petitioner in the writ petition, respondent No.1 is directed to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 26.07.2010 and communicate the decision thereon to it within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by such communication, it is entitled to avail any of the common law remedies available to it in law. With the above direction, the writ petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.23943 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 07th September, 2010 GHN