1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 90 OF 2010 (Suresh B. Khodke vs. Managing Director, Buldhana District Central Coop. Bank Ltd. & Ors.) and WRIT PETITION NO. 91 OF 2010 (Sanjay R. Pawar vs. Managing Director, Buldhana District Central Coop. Bank Ltd. & Ors.) with WRIT PETITION NO. 92 OF 2010 (Ku. Sangita Kisan Pawar vs. Managing Director, Buldhana District Central Coop. Bank Ltd. & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. APRIL 12, 2010. Shri D.T. Sharma, Advocate holding for Shri Wathore, learned counsel for the petitioners states that Shri Wathore, learned counsel is not feeling well and he is seeking adjournment. The matter pertains to verification of caste claim and continuation in employment in the meanwhile. This Court has considered the controversy on earlier occasion also. Hence, the request of Shri Sharma, Advocate to adjourn the matter is rejected. Shri Patil, learned counsel for Respondents No. 1 & 2 and S/Shri Mujumdar, Kankale and Adgokar, learned AGPs for respondent No.3 in respective writ petitions point out that the petitioners are already out of employment from 16.11.2009. The petitioners have approached the Labour Court, Buldhana, in Complaint ULP seeking protection of their services till their caste claim are invalidated by the 2 Caste Scrutiny Committee. It appears that the said interim relief was rejected on 08.10.2009 by Labour Court. The revisions filed before Industrial Court are still pending and on those revisions on 16.10.2009, the Industrial Court has refused interim relief. It is thus apparent that Labour Court as also Industrial Court have not granted any interim relief and revisions and complaints are still pending. In this situation, it will be appropriate to direct Labour Court at Buldhana to decide the Complaints ULP as early as possible and in any case within a period of four months from the date of communication of this order to it. Respondents No. 1 & 2 employer shall not make any arrangement or fill in the vacancies in the meanwhile to the prejudice of the petitioners. Respondent No. 3 – Caste Scrutiny Committee, Amravati, to expedite the consideration of caste claim and attempt to decide it in the meanwhile. Subject to this, writ petitions are disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.