IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 24 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 332 OF 2010 MR. RAMESH S. KERKAR ... Petitioner Versus MR. RAJESH RAGHUVIR KERKAR ... Respondent Mr. Kapil Kerkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. M. Amonkar, Advocate for the Respondent. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 7th May, 2010 P.C.: Heard. 2. Notice. Shri Amonkar appears on behalf of the respondents. 3. Shri Amonkar states that the position of the suit construction can be seen at page 27 which is a photograph produced by respondent no.1. However, Counsel on behalf of the applicant submits that since then a slab has been constructed. However, there is no material placed on record to substantiate the said allegation. Consequently, the application is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition with sufficient material to indicate that prima facie the undertaking given on 27/04/2010 has been violated. Application disposed of accordingly. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH