IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No.34030 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 11, 2011 Raman Nagpal ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Sanjay Vij, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Since the charges have already been framed, the petitioner is fully entitled to file a revision. He has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to invoke the inherent jurisdiction. Faced with this situation, the counsel submits that he will not press this petition with liberty to file a revision petition. Liberty as prayed for is granted Counsel also seeks permission to file a revision on the basis of a true copy as the certified copy has been annexed with the present petition. Dismissed with liberty as prayed for. November 11, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE