Criminal Misc. No. M 3094 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-3094 of 2009 Date of Decision:September 27, 2010 Sandeep Sharma ...........Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..........Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sabina Present: None for the petitioner. Mr.Satyavir Singh Yadav, Deputy Advocate General,Haryana Mr.Mahesh Dheer,Advocate for respondent No.2 ** Sabina, J. Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short `Cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of FIR No. 4 dated 13.1.2009 registered under Sections 420, 467,468,471,120-B of the Indian Penal Code (for short `IPC') at Police Station Sector 19 Panchkula and all further proceedings arising there from . At the time of issuance of notice of motion in the present petition on 29.5.2010, the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner wants to settle the matter with the respondent-Bank and he is ready to pay the entire amount due towards him to the respondent- Bank in three instalments within a span of six months after getting Criminal Misc. No. M 3094 of 2009 2 concession of bail. It is stated that the petitioner is also ready to give crossed post-dated cheques to the respondent-Bank in this regard. Notice of motion for 17.8.2009.” None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner although the case has been called for the third time. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has submitted that no efforts have been made by the petitioner to settle the dispute in question. Learned State counsel has given a list of other cases registered against the petitioner, the details whereof are as follows:- "District Panchkula Sandeep Sharma S/o Mange Ram R/o Village Sangroly PS Dand Distt. Kaithal 1.FIR No.47 dted 30.1.2008 under Sections 326/419/420/467/468/471/120-B, IPC Police Station Sector 5 Panchkula. PIC 2.FIR No.36 dated 12.3.2008 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC, Police Station Sector 20, Panchkula PIC 3.FIR No. 71 dated 27.5.2008 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC, Police Station Sector 20, Panchkula PIC 4.FIR No. 92 dated 10.7.2008 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC, Police Station Sector 20, Panchkula PIC 5.FIR No.344 dated 9.7.2008 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC, Police Station Sector 5, Panchkula Criminal Misc. No. M 3094 of 2009 3 PIC 6. FIR No.4 dated 13.1.2008 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC Police Station Sector 20, Panchkula. PIC Chandigarh 1.FIR No. 131 dated 15.3.2008 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC Police Station Mani Majra 2.FIR No. 268 dated 25.5.2008 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC Police Station Sector 17, Chandigarh. 3.FIR No. 86 dated 2.5.2008 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC, Sector 3 Chandigarh. District Ambala FIR No. 41 dated 2005 under Section 392 IPC and 25/54/59 of the Arms Act, Police Station Parao. CBI 1. RC 0712008 ED 0002 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B and 13(1) ABC P.C.Act, CBI Khan market New Delhi. 2. RC.0712008 ED0044 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC 13(1)ABC CBI Khan Market New Delhi." The allegations against the petitioner are that he was not a qualified medical practitioner and had failed to repay the loan amount and also to create security over the assets. An amount of Rs. 17,95,288/- was outstanding against the petitioner. Thus, the petitioner has not only cheated respondent No.2 but has also cheated the other Banks. In these circumstances, no ground for interference is made out. Criminal Misc. No. M 3094 of 2009 4 Dismissed. ( Sabina ) Judge September 27, 2010 arya