IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 4147 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- NARENDRA V PARIKH Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 4147 of 1999 MR MANOJ N POPAT for Petitioner No. 1 MR NG DOHIL A.G.P. for Respondents Nos. 1-2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD Date of decision: 13/10/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard learned advocate Mr.Manoj Popat appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.G.P. Mr.Gohil apperaing on behalf of respondents nos.1 and 2. 2. In the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 21st April, 1999 at Annexure-C passed by the respondents - authorities holding for the institution of Departmental Inquiry against a retired person after 11 years of issuance of chargesheet. Learned advocate Mr.Popat submitted that now the Departmental Inquiry against the petitioner is already over and that has been challenged by the petitioner in different petition. Therefore, this petition has now become infructuous. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. Interim relief if any, stands vacated. No order as to costs. [H.K. Rathod, J.] /phalguni/