1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO. 117 OF 2011 In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956); AND In the matter of Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956; AND In the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation of Reliance Communications Maharashtra Private Limited (“the Transferor Company” or “RCMPL” ) with Reliance Telecom Limited (“the Transferee Company” or “RTL”) and their respective shareholders and creditors RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS MAHARASHTRA PRIVATE LIMITED, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and having its registered office at H Block, 1st Floor, Dhirubhai Ambani Knowledge City, Navi Mumbai-400 710. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ……..Applicant Company Called Summons for Direction Coram: S. C. Dharmadhikari, J. Date: 18th February, 2011 Mr. Rajesh Shah i/b. Rajesh Shah & Co., Advocates for the Applicant. 2 MINUTES OF THE ORDER UPON the application of the Applicant Company abovenamed by a Summons for Direction AND UPON HEARING Mr. Rajesh Shah instructed by Rajesh Shah & Co., Advocates for the Applicant Company, AND UPON READING the Affidavit dated 4th February, 2011 of Mr. Hitesh Marthak, Authorised Representative of the Applicant Company, in support of Company Summons for Direction and the Exhibits therein referred to, IT IS ORDERED: 1. That convening and holding the meeting of the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant /Transferor Company for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, approving, with or without modification(s), the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation of Reliance Communications Maharashtra Private Limited, the Applicant/Transferor Company with Reliance Telecom Limited, the Transferee Company and their respective shareholders and creditors is dispensed with in view of the consents given by both the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company, which are annexed as Exhibits ‘J1’ and ‘J2’ to the Affidavit in support of the Company Summons for Direction. 2. That there are no Secured Creditors in the Applicant /Transferor Company, as stated in paragraph 16 of the Affidavit in support of the Company Summons for Direction. Hence, the question of convening and holding the meeting of Secured Creditors does not arise. 3. That convening and holding the meeting of the Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant/ Transferor Company, for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, approving, with or without modification(s), the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation of Reliance 3 Communications Maharashtra Private Limited, the Applicant/Transferor Company with Reliance Telecom Limited, the Transferee Company and their respective shareholders and creditors is dispensed with in view of the averments made in paragraph 17 of the Affidavit in support of the Summons for Direction. The Applicant Company undertakes to serve individual notice of hearing of the Petition by R.P.A.D upon all its Unsecured Creditors and also to publish the same in two local newspapers viz., Free Press Journal, in English and Maharashtra Times, in Marathi having circulation in Mumbai. The undertaking is accepted. 4. That the filing of a separate Company Summons for Direction and Company Scheme Petition in relation to the proposed Scheme by Reliance Telecom Limited, the Transferee Company is dispensed with in view of the averments made in paragraphs 18 to 20 of the Affidavit in Support of the Company Summons for Direction. (S. C. Dharmadhikari, J.)