IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- No. 18577 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 1.11.2011 Smt. Saroj …Petitioner Versus Surender and another …Respondents ………. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, Advocate for the petitioner. None for respondent No.1 Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Crl. Misc. No. 53892 of 2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this application. Dismissed as not pressed. Main Case Learned counsel for the petitioner states that now the case is fixed for framing of the charges before the trial court, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise arguments on the discharge before the trial court pointing out that without the factum of death no charge under Section 302 IPC can be framed. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. ( Alok Singh ) November 1, 2011 Judge Anand