IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29222 of 2009 1. VINOD SINGH @ Binod Singh 2. Jitendra Singh 3. Upendra Singh Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 13.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is case and counter case for the occurrence of the same day. There is land dispute in between the parties. Petitioner no.2 resorted a firing but did not hit anyone and petitioners no. 1 and 3 have been alleged for causing assault by means of lithi, while co-accused, Gautam Azad has been alleged for causing assault by means of fersa that also found simple caused by hard and blunt substances and snatching of chain is ornamental not justifying petitioners’ arrest. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Ara Muffasil P.S. Case No. 59 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bhojpur, Ara subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)