IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9922 of 2010 SMT.BINDU YADAV Versus 1. The STATE OF BIHAR 2. Ritesh Kumar ------ 2/ 19.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties. It never can be appreciated that civil right has been challenged filing Criminal case and that is being agitated in different ways. Really, petitioner was sold/transferred a piece of land said trust property. If transferor has no right, it should be within knowledge of this petitioner. It appears a conspiracy on his behalf also and even then he dares to come for cancellation of the bail so granted in the case for the act for which he has equal liability, if any, offence is made out. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. I fail to understand why Sub-Registrar was entrusted with interest of this petitioner in filing criminal case against the transferor only. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)