IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.6812 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 15.12.2010 Rajbir and another ....Petitioners Versus Sachin and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Nilesh Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. There is no legal infirmity in the impugned order. The defence of the petitioners was struck off in the year 2006 and he was also proceeded against ex-parte. He moved an application for setting aside the same which was accepted by the Court and the petitioners have been permitted to join the proceedings from the stage where they joined. The prayer of the petitioners that the impugned order be set aside is not tenable in the eyes of law. There is no plausible explanation as to why the petitioners did not join the proceedings at the initial stage when they had been served and when they acquired the knowledge of the proceedings. At this stage when four years have passed, it would not be appropriate to grant the prayer of the petitioners especially when no error of jurisdiction is shown to have C.R.No.6812 of 2010 (O&M) -2- been committed by the learned trial court. Dismissed. 15.12.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss