: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.305 OF 2008 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.46 OF 2008 Dadabhau Namdeo Jadhav .. Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. Shrishail Sakhare for the Petitioner. Mr. G.S. Hegde for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 26 TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C.: 1. The Contempt Petition has been filed contending that there is a breach of the order of this Court dated 19th June, 2008. By this order, the Division Bench directed the respondent-State Government to consider the Writ Petition as a representation and the competent authority was directed to pass appropriate orders on the application expeditiously. It appears that the competent authority has passed an order and found that the request of the petitioner for allotment of the flat was not in consonance with the rules and, therefore, the representation could not be allowed. : 2 : 2. The petitioner was informed of this decision by letter dated 17th September, 2008. The Contempt Petition has been filed on 7th August, 2008. In my view, the petitioner cannot contend that the respondents have committed contempt. The respondents have considered the representation of the petitioner and obeyed the orders of this Court by considering the same. The representation has been considered within three months of the order being passed by this Court. 3. The Contempt Petition is dismissed.