1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO.3104 OF 2006 Smt. Tejaswini S. Londhe. ...Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. ... Mr.Mihir Desai with Mrs.Anupama B. Shah for the Petitioner. Ms.S. M. Dandekar, AGP for Respondent No.1 and 4. Mr.Shaikh Nasir Masin for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. December 18, 2006. P.C. The School Tribunal has by its order dated 2nd December 2006 kept in abeyance an interim ex-parte order that was passed on 30th November 2006 until the application for interim relief is taken up for hearing. Interference of this Court at the present stage is not warranted when the application for interim relief is yet to be taken up for disposal by the Tribunal. At this stage, both Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and the Management are agreed that since the appeal involves rather a narrow question of law, any delay in the matter may be obviated by requesting the School Tribunal to dispose of the appeal itself on 2 merits instead of the application for interim relief. The Petitioner has agreed not to press the application for interim relief. The next date of hearing, the Court is informed, is 6th January 2007. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Management states that the management would file a written statement on the next date of hearing with an advance copy to Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. The Writ Petition is disposed of by requesting the School Tribunal to endeavour an expeditious disposal of the appeal. Parties agreed to cooperate with the School Tribunal so that the appeal can be disposed of preferably by the end of February 2007. All the rights and contentions of the parties are kept open. The Petition is disposed of. ....