1 lpa2-11 dmt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 2 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5553 OF 2010 Maharashtra Shramik Sena ... Appellant.. V/s. Bhikusa Papers Pvt. Ltd., & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. A.A. Pai for appellant. Mr. K.S. Bapat i/by Desai & Desai for respondents. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATE : 24th JANUARY, 2011 P.C. The grievance of the appellant is that even though as per the order of the learned Single Judge the concerned workmen have tried to report for duty, the management has not given them any work. Mr. Bapat submitted that the concerned workmen had not reported for duty and it seems that they are not interested in resuming the work. Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that they had tried to report for duty and they had not been given any work. Mr. Pai, the learned counsel for the appellant, says that they have reported for duty. The learned counsel for the appellant says that all the 30 workmen, except 9 workmen in question, will report for duty today with proper undertaking. Mr. Bapat, the learned counsel for 2 lpa2-11 the respondents says that if they report for duty, they will be given appropriate work. It is clarified that if there is any dispute in this behalf, it is open for the appellant to take appropriate recourse by making necessary application before the learned Single Judge in the pending writ petition. This Court would not like to interfere with the impugned order which is interlocutory in nature. 2. In view of what is stated hereinabove, the Letters Patent Appeal stands disposed of. (A.A.SAYED, J.) (P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)