IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11326 of 2011 SANTOSH KUMAR PANDEY @ SANTOSH PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 21.06.2011 Petitioner being husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 304B of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The marriage was performed three years prior to the occurrence. The accusation is of demand of motorcycle and color T.V. as dowry. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that informant has himself admitted that father-in-law of the victim had himself informed about serious illness of the victim when the informant went to petitioner’s house. It is further submitted that informant has retracted from his initial version and considering the same, the parents of the petitioner have been granted bail. In view of this Court, the retracted version of the informant is a fit ground for consideration of regular bail of the petitioner provided petitioner surrenders within a period of four weeks in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 102 of 2009. With the observations made above, the 2 application stands disposed off. Let the order of this Court be transmitted through FAX to the learned Court below at the cost of the petitioner. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)