WP.3353-10 - 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 3353 OF 2010 Mr. Manish Indravan Pancholi ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents *** Mr. A. M. Sarogi, for the Petitioner. Mr. D. R. More, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Hrushikesh Mundargi, for Respondent No.2. *** CORAM: V. M. KANADE J. DATE : DECEMBER 23, 2010 P.C. . The petitioner has filed this writ petition for quashing the complaint, filed by respondent No.2, by consent. A joint affidavit has been filed by the petitioner & respondent No.2. In the said affidavit, respondent No. 2 has stated that he has no objection if the complaint is quashed. Both the parties are present in the Court. A joint affidavit is signed by the petitioner, respondent No.2 and their respective advocates. Since the dispute between the parties is personal one, in view of WP.3353-10 - 2 - judgment of the Apex Court, in the case of - Madan Mohan Abbot vs. State of Punjab [AIR 2008 SC 1969], there is no impediment in quashing the complaint. The writ petition is therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and is accordingly disposed of. [ V. M. KANADE J.]