1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.385 OF 2009 Pravin B. Desai and Ors. ...Petitioners. v. Shri Hemraj Quaya & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Anilkumar Patil , adv. For the Petitioners. Mr. A.I.I.Patel, AGP For the Respondent/State. Shri Suhas S. Deokar i/by C.G.Gavnekar, advs. For the R.No.3. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : JULY 21, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard. On 6th October, 2008 in Writ Petition No.4274 of 2008 while rule was issued, it was made clear that the authorities would not be precluded from taking action against encroachers/shop keepers which are placed on the other side of the road on following due process of law. The A.G.P. was directed to convey the order to the Collector and the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad so that the compliance report could be filed before the Division Bench alongwith the affidavit of collector and the Chief Executive Officer within 12 weeks. Contempt petition was filed alleging that the compliance report is not filed within time. In fact the compliance report was to be filed before the Division Bench in the writ petition, which is pending, therefore, question of filing 2 contempt petition does not arise. Petitioner could make grievances before the Division Bench dealing with that writ petition. 2 Therefore, contempt petition stands dismissed. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)