IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-9795 of 2008 Date of decision:- 21.5.2008 Rajesh alias Raju ...Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana & Another ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. S.S. Duhan , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Ghenga, DAG, Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL J. Service of respondents is complete. No one has appeared for respondent No.2-complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 11.1.2004. Because of temperamental differences, the parties could not live together. In a petition filed by respondent-complainant ex-parte divorce decree has already been passed by learned Additional District Judge, Jind on 24.12.2007. Complaint was filed by respondent no.2 against the petitioner under Section 406, 498A IPC, in which the petitioner has been summoned to face trial. As the marriage between the parties has already been dissolved, though ex-parte, the petitioner is ready and willing to return the dowry articles and also settle other dues such as maintenance or permanent alimony. He further submits that in terms of the order passed on 22.4.2008 he has already put in appearance before the trial Court and furnished his bail bonds. Without recording any finding on the merits of the controversy, the interim order dated 22.4.2008 is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. May 21, 2008 (RAJESH BINDAL) ritu-II JUDGE