IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.5460 of 1990 (O&M) Date of decision:30.03.2011 Shri P.L.Jagga ....Petitioner versus The Central Bank of India and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. Madan Lal Advocate, for Mr. Raman Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Vanita Sapra, Advocate, for the respondents. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) 1. The writ petition challenges the order of dismissal from service after the disciplinary enquiry. The main ground of challenge is that there was no show cause notice prior to the punishment inflicted on him. The justification by the respondent was that there was no prejudice caused and the order was in terms of Regulation No.7 of the Central Bank of India Officers Employees (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976. The issue of whether a want of notice prior to inflicting punishment after an enquiry is settled through a five member Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Managing Director, ECIL Versus B.Karunakar-(1993) 4 SCC 727. 2. The order of dismissal already passed is upheld and the writ petition challenging the same is dismissed. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 30.03.2011 sanjeev