1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1369 OF 2010 Shabbir Vazir ...Petitioner Versus Usman Janglo Shah, Since deceased per LRS: 1A.Hawabai Usman Shah & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.A.K.Patil for Petitioner. None for Respondents. ...... CORAM:- A.S.OKA, J. DATED:- FEBRUARY 25, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner. The Petitioner is the original Defendant. An application was made by the Petitioner for amendment of the written statement after evidence in the Suit was closed. By the impugned order, the said application has been rejected. 2. Considering the stage at which the application was made, this is not a case where interference can be made at this stage in writ jurisdiction. In view of Section 105 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the impugned order is capable of being challenged in an Appeal which may be preferred 2 by the Petitioner against the decree passed in the Suit, if the same be adverse to the Petitioner. 3. Subject to what is observed above, no interference is called for. Writ Petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J.)