IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16421 of 2009 1. MD.NAIM 2. Md. Ekramul 3. Bibi Zarina 4. Md. Islam 5. Bibi Saidun Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 19.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that complainant earlier married with one Anmol @ Molva in the year 1990 and due to some reason that marriage was dissolved. Thereafter, the complainant married to petitioner no.1. This much of the circumstance clearly shows that there could be no demand of dowry, rather that is alleged due to her having relation with the first husband which was objected by petitioner no.1. All the family members have been made accused for the same and apprehending their arrest, which never can be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 1985C of 2008, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Araria subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)