IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M- 4 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.3.2011 ... Hari Kishan Garg ................Petitioner vs. State of Haryana .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Satya Pal Jain, Senior Advocate with Sh. Dheeraj Jain, Advocate for the petitioner Sh. Amandeep Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Sh. K.D.S. Hooda, Advocate for the complainant. ... K.C. Puri, J. Learned State counsel, on instructions from Shiv Charan, DSP Crime, has stated at the Bar that the petitioner has joined the investigation. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that to attract the provisions of Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes & Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, the conversation must be in public view. But according to the allegation, it was on mobile phone, which is personal matter. So, without commenting on the merits of the case at this stage, the order dated 3.1.2011, passed by this Court is made absolute. ( K.C. Puri ) 11.3.2011 Judge chugh