1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR W.P. No. 28 of 2008 (Rajesh s/o. Kawaduji Kamble .vs. Union of India and anr.) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. - =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, JJ. DATE : 09.04.2008. Heard Mr. M. Sudame, Adv. for the Petitioner and Ms.Chaubey, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Present Writ Petition is directed against the impugned order dt. 11.10.2007 whereby the Original Application filed by the petitioner came to be dismissed. Considered the rival contentions canvassed by the respective counsel. At the outset, we want to express that it is not in dispute that the petitioner participated in the trade test twice and was found unfit. If that is so, the petitioner in fact is estopped from canvassing any grievance about holding of trade test by the respondents. The petitioner now complains about holding of trade test only because the petitioner was found unfit and disqualified and therefore, on this short ground, the petition needs to be dismissed. However, we have perused the impugned order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, dt. 11.10.2007. Perusal of the impugned order shows that the conclusion arrived at by the Tribunal after 2 considering the rival contentions of the respective parties appeared to be just and proper and need no interference. Hence, the Petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE ssj