IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14408 of 2008 KANHAIYA PRASAD & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 06.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioners are father and son and accused in complaint case no. 2100 of 2005 pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chapra under Section 323, 406, 500, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The complainant is son-in-law of petitioner no.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits based on the evidence on record that the whole thing in complaint case is a fall out of certain litigations which is going on between the parties. Even otherwise taking the nature of allegations on the face value, the probabilities of the so-called allegation is highly doubtful. Keeping in mind the allegations in the complaint petition, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, let the petitioners namely Kanhaiya Prasad, Arbind Kumar @ Pappu, be enlarged on furnishing bail bond of the sum of Rs.10,000/- 2 (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chapra, in connection with Complaint Case no. 2100 of 2005, Trial No. 2235 of 2007, subject to conditions under Section 438(2)of the Cr.P.C. Rajeev/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)