Bsnrt IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILj^PURJC.G.) WRIT PETITION N0. - ^Z^_OF 2006 PETITIONER ^ J^t^s" ^•^'t^3"""" ?'es<?"\...---;"" A^-' RESPONDENTS Ram Das Darshan S/o Shri Daulat Ram Darshan^ Aged about 67 years, R/o village Madanpur, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.)) VERSUS <d] State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretaiy, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) -^2] The Accountant General, Raipur (C.G.) 3] The Deputy Director, Education, ^ Raigarh (C.G.). PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTIOILOF INDIA FOR ISSUENCE OF WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION QR DIRECTIONS UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMDTANCES OF THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH ATBJLASPUR WRIT PETITIONNo. 1843 of 2006 PETITIONER Ram DasDarshan. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Slate of ChhatUsgarh & Others. PETmONUNDER ARTICLE 22&227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri S.K.Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 & 3. ORDERjtQRAy (Passedon269' dayrf April.2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that tfie case, being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to the pension committee. Shri Tiwari further submjts that is Court, by order dated 23.06.2009 has stayed the order dated OS.(».2003(Annexure P,i2). 2. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Bai/nat/i Mandal v. The State of Ctihattisgarh S Offier^ and other connected matters, directed ttie Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, puroUant io fhe order dated 19.06.2006 passed in VV.P. No. 1961/2006 (Sffit Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Govemment and oVier^ and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (Slate af Ctihatt/sgaffi S Offiers y. Baijnath Mandal and anotfiei). Thus, this petition is squareiy covered by the judgment and order dated 31 of January, 2CK38 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baijnath Mandai {supr^) as submitted by iearned counsel appearing fortheparties. 3. This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to Uie Committee, wlUiin a -period of 15 days from tne date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner ana' this order. Tnereafter, the Committee shali issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concemed, within a further period of 15 days. Tne Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity or hearing to the petib'oner. The petitioner and the officers concemed may fiie additionai documente, if necessary. Tne entire exsreise, inciuding payment of retiral dues, if any, to Itie petiBoner be compieted w'thin a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of thia order. 4. The petitioner shail supply extra copy of the pefition to the tearned counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the same to the Commiitee. 5. inferim relief granted by !his Court on 23.06.2009, shait continue till disposa! of the matter by the Pension Committes. r Sd/- SatishKAgnihotn Judge