IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.25723 of 2000 Between: 1 Amarnath Singh, S/o Late. Capt. Ramdhyan Singh, R/o 9-8-480/A, Chota Bazar, Naurangi Maidan, Golconda, Hyderabad. 2 Shri Abdul Lateef Khan, S/o Late.Abdul RAsheed Khan, R/o 8-1-366/72, Janakinagar Colony, Tolichowki, Hyderabad. 3 Shri Mohd. Zakir, S/o Late.Mohd. Baquer, R/o H.No.13-4-151, Kismat Cafe, Sabzi Mandi, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Golconda Mandal, Hyderabad. 3 Station House Officer, Golconda Police Station, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction especially in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent, their sub- ordinates, men, and agents not to interfere in any way with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of Ac.2.36 guntas of land bearing Sy.No.137, 138, 139, 141, 144 to 148 of Naurangi Maidan land situated near Fatha Darwaza, Golconda Fort, Hyderabad, and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MOVVA.CHANDRASHEKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ASSIGNMENT The Court made the following Order: On the representation made by Sri Movva Chandrasekhara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, that the petitioner died, this Court, by order dated 28-08-2008, dismissed the writ petition as abated since the legal representatives of the petitioner were not brought on record. Subsequently, the Registry brought to the notice of this Court that there were three petitioners in the writ petition and since it was not clear as to whether all of them had died, this Court posted the writ petition “for being mentioned” on 29-08-2008. Since the counsel for the petitioners was not present on 29-08-2008, the matter was adjourned to 06-09-2008 and since the counsel was absent on 06-09-2008 also, the matter was directed to be posted on 08-09-2008 “for dismissal”. Today, though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ neither the counsel for the petitioner is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. As such, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J Dt:10-09-2008 Usd To 1 The Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Golconda Mandal, Hyderabad. 3 The Station House Officer, Golconda Police Station, Hyderabad. 4 Two CCs to GP for Assignment, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 5 Two CD copies.