IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 30724 of 2011(M) ------------------------ PETITIONER : --------------------- GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI, PRALIL HOUSE, KUTTOOR VILLAGE, KOTTOOR P.O., THIRUVALLA TALUK-689 106. BY ADVS. SRI.R.GIREESH VARMA SRI.V.K.GANGADHARAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 645. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVALLA-689 101. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLA-689 101. 4. JAYA, MADATHIL VADAKKETHIL, KUTTOOR P.O., KUTTOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK-689 106. R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. C.R. SHYAM KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 30724 of 2011(M) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE DISABILITY CERTIFICATE OF PETITIONER'S SON. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN AS 20/93 DTD.31.7.95 PASSED BY THE SUB COURT, THIRUVALLA. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER 3.9.11 IN IA 943/11 IN OS 137/2011. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED FROM THE PANCHAYATH OFFICE, KUTTOOR. EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE KUTTOOR PANCHAYATH. EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTRICITY BILL ISSUED FROM THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, KALLISSERY SECTION. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K.HARILAL,JJ ------------------------------------------------- W.P(C) No. 30724 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Pius C. Kuriakose, J Sri.C.R.Shyam Kumar, the learned Senior Government Pleader submits that he is yet to get instruction from respondents 2 and 3. We have gone through the averments in the writ petition and we have heard the counsel for the petitioner. It is seen that civil disputes are pending between the parties and in fact civil suit is also pending. The complaint of the petitioner is that the police are unnecessarily intervening in the civil dispute. We dispose of this writ petition reminding the police (respondents 2 and 3) that it is not within their domain to intervene in the civil disputes between the parties. At same time we permit of respondents 2 and 3, if reports are received by them regarding commission of offences by any of the parties to take action as per Code of Criminal Procedure/Police Act. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE K.HARILAL JUDGE ab