R: c. -^' t<3»l INTHElHGHCOURTOF^JUMeATUREAtBiLASPUR CHHAmSCSARH WRTrpETniONNb. /2006 pEnnoNER KEigPONDENTS ^^M^- t^$^ M^ ^"'^^®^ ^.....-BS^--"'" l^i'-^,. ^y .c>*".:'::.:;, .^-^ :':.'' ^i^ ^rf.^'-^-^'.fKSC^ : <^ Byadha Lal Satnaim^g/o Maliettar Lal Satnami, Ageci about 421Years, R/o Village - Khajurani, Post - Khajurani, Tehsil — Jaijaipur Distt, -Janjgir-ChampafG.G.) VERSUS 1. State ofChhaffisgarh Through- Collector, Janjgir Distt. —Janjgir-Chajnpa.(C.G\) The Additional ColleGtor, Janjgir Distt. - Janjgir-Chainpa (C.Gy) 3. The Sub Divisional iQHicer (Revenue), Sakfi, • Distt.Jaiiigir-ChainpafC.G.) ^. The Tahsildar, Jaijaipur Distt. - .Jajngir-Chaint>a/(C.G|) ..5. Rajesh Kumar S/o Rainesh^yar Chandra, Aged about 27 years, Village - Khajurani, Teh. jEirjaipur, Distt. - Janjgir—Champa (C.l 6. Naresh Rumar S/o Rameshwar Ghandra; Aged about - 24 R/o Village - Khajurani^ Jayaipur, Distt. - Janjgu-- Champa -•(C.G.)';,.', .;....::. ^ /T.^KushalRain.S/Q Marinulal aged about 32 years R/o ViBage - Khajurani, Teh. Jaijaipur, ©istt.- Janjgir- CHampa (C.G.) wmTF'fiTlTION'IJNDERARTICLB 226/227 OFTHE ^ CONSTnWnONOFINDIA Lal >,R/o aipur, © -) :. rar Lal Years, Teh. XI-HC-78 *TTtTCfTSb*1|ch 3^'r41-i|lc1*l, iSlTn^'IS, ftMiyy ..^.ie...^.^.^r2 <0 341^1 4d* (*l?tdsl<«.^') 311^1 qiTfeNi craTsn^TstiiI* s Soma /^ SOTWflferan^T 25-8-2006 Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel Miss Deepali Pandey, Panel L^ufyer for the State/respondents No.l to 4, on advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By the instant writ petition lunder Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has questio^ned the le9ality, propriety and correctness of the order dated 29-7-2006, wh^reby learned Additional Collector, Janjgir has rejected the prayer for stayi^g the effect and operation of the opder dated 21-7-2006 passed by the Sutj I have perused the order A^inexure P-4 dated 21-7-2006 whereby the Sub Divisional Officer has quashe<( appointment on the post of Kotwar passed resolution in favour of resp attaining the cge of 60 years, re or infirmity in passin9 the impu9n liable to be dismissed and it is accor|dingly, dismissed, in iimine. Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.34p3/2006 stands disposed of. ^wfrl4l-IKItld1'^fel^<Rl<<l< te»[f^IT3TI^?r counsel for the petitioner. Divisionol Officer, Sakti. the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Kotwar on the 9round thaf respondent No.7 herein was entitled for A ?- L that the 6ram Panchayat has ndent No.7 herein and olso as the father of respondent No.7 was already wor(<ing as Kotwar ond on his retirement of ^pondent No.7 is entitled for preferential treotment. In view of the above, respor)dent No.2 has not committed any ille9ality ^d order. Therefore, the writ petition is