CWP No. 107 of 2005 27.2.2009 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Mukul Sood vice counsel for the respondents. Mr. T.S. Chauhan prays for and is allowed further two weeks’ time to file the rejoinder. List immediately thereafter. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 27, 2009 (cr) RSA No. 462 of 2002 27.2.2009 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan vice counsel for the appellant. Mr. Mukul Sood vice counsel for the respondent. At the request of Mr. T.S. Chauhan, list after four weeks. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 27, 2009 (cr) RSA No. 100 of 1998 27.2.2009 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan vice counsel for the appellant. Mr. Mukul Sood vice counsel for the respondents. At the request of Mr. T.S. Chauhan, list after four weeks. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 27, 2009 (cr) CWP No. 621 of 2005 with CWP No. 292 of 2005. 27.2.2009 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr. Mukul Sood vice counsel for the respondents No. 3 & 4. At the request of Mr. T.S. Chauhan, list after four weeks. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 27, 2009 (cr) Cr.M.P.(M) No. 103 of 2009 27.2.2009 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy.A.G. for the respondent. The learned Senior Additional Advocate General prays for and is allowed a week’s time for requisitioning the record. List on 9.3.2009. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 27, 2009 (cr) Cr.M.P.(M) No. 102 of 2009 27.2.2009 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy.A.G. for the respondent. The learned Senior Additional Advocate General prays for and is allowed a week’s time for requisitioning the record. List on 9.3.2009. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 27, 2009 (cr) CS No. 26 of 2006 27.2.2009 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan vice counsel for the plaintiffs. Mr. Mukul Sood vice counsel for the defendants. In view of the notification dated 21.2.2009, this Civil Suit is transferred to the District Judge, Mandi. He will proceed with the matter immediately after the receipt of the file. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 27, 2009. (cr) Cr.M.P.(M) No. 73 of 2009 27.2.2009 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy.A.G. for the respondent. At the request of Mr. T.S. Chauhan, list on 3.3.2009. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 27, 2009. (cr) Cr.M.P.(M) No. 72 of 2009 27.2.2009 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy.A.G. for the respondent. At the request of Mr. T.S. Chauhan, list on 3.3.2009. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 27, 2009. (cr) C.Review No. 12 of 2008 27.2.2009 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India for respondents No. 1 & 4. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy.A.G. for respondent No.2. Mr. Mukul Sood vice counsel for respondent No.3. At the request of Mr. T.S. Chauhan, list after two weeks. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 27, 2009. (cr) CWP No. 1344 of 2007 27.2.2009 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr.Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. T.S. Chauhan appearing vice counsel for the petitioner prays for and is allowed a week’s time to take steps for the service of respondent No.10. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 27, 2009. (cr) CS No. 42 of 2003 27.2.2009 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan vice counsel for the plaintiffs. Mr. Mukul Sood vice counsel for defendants. OMP No. 334 of 2008: Mr. T.S. Chauhan prays for and is allowed two weeks’ time to file rejoinder to the replies filed by the respondents/defendants. List after two weeks. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 27, 2009. (cr) RSA No. 51 of 1998 27.2.2009 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan vice counsel for the appellant. Mr. Mukul Sood vice counsel for defendant No. 1. CMP No. 15 of 2009: Allowed. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 27, 2009. (cr) CMPMO No. 859 of 2008 27.2.2009 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Baldev Singh, Advocate for the respondents. Since the record as per order dated 31.12.2008 has been received, the present CMPMO has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 27, 2009. (cr) Cr.M.P.(M) No. 74 of 2009 27.2.2009 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy.a.G. for the respondent. The learned Senior Additional Advocate General on the basis of instructions imparted to him by the Investigating Officer does not oppose the bail application. Accordingly, the interim order dated 20.2.2009 is made absolute and the application stands disposed of. Mr. T.S. Chauhan has brought to the notice of the Court that Ms. Dharma Devi has presently been lodged at Nari Niketan Ashram, Mashobra. According to Mr. Chauhan, Ms. Dharma Devi is a student of +2. He further submits that taking into consideration the ensuing examination, appropriate directions be issued to the Social Welfare Officer, Shimla to look after the interests of minor girl. Accordingly, the Social Welfare Officer, Shimla is directed to do the needful to protect the interests of minor Ms. Dharma Devi. The petitioner is directed to handover the books and clothes to the Social Welfare Officer, Shimla. He shall further handover the books to Ms. Dharma Devi in the Ashram. Copy of this order will be conveyed to the Social Welfare Officer, Shimla by the learned Senior Additional Advocate General within two hours positively. Copy ‘Dasti’. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 27, 2009. (cr) COPC No. 5 of 2009 27.2.2009 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan vice counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India for respondent No.1. Mr. Mukul Sood vice counsel for respondents No. 2 & 3. Mr. T.S. Chauhan submits that rejoinder is being filed during the course of the day. The respondents No. 2 & 3 have not chosen to be present in the Court despite clear procedure under the Contempt of Court Rules, 1966. The Court has -------restraint to issue notice to respondent No.1. However, notices were ordered to be issued to respondents No. 2 & 3 why and under what circumstances the Officers of B.S.N.L. have not appeared before the Court as required as per law. The …..personal hearing…..to take against respondents No. 2 & 3. It is also …..presence of respondents No. 2 & 3. (Rajiv Sharma), J. February 27, 2009. (cr)