iN THE HIGH CDURT DF MAEHVA PRADESH AT JABRLPUR %/\l ‘ HRIT PETITIDNV ND. 73 M BF 192g C ‘ FETlTlDNER Eadri Wr$aaé Rathoray §nn a? $hri handra$wn R&thura, age a&mut‘ 3W yeaVa$ Prnpriatmr Eman mptici&n$ (Cha$ma H$u$a), Eaijn$thpuVa, u wawmmw m- $hri Ta $hwar Puri Ga$wami, $0n a? Fi Bh&nraj G0$wamiy Mathpara, RQIPURn PETITI N UNDER §RTI£LES 226/227 9F THE CUNSTITUTIOM F INDIA & k . vERSUS RE$P$ND£NT§ # 1" $$$i$taHt L&huur $0mmi$§i0ner Raipur Diwi§ian, (Ce tral§, Raipur RAIFUR, RAIFUR, / / K _ ‘ 2 _ . ¥ - ‘ I JUDICATURE CHHTTISGAR: BILASPU HON BLE SHRI JAGDISH BHALLA Ag CJ iNGLE‘BENC ésH . adn Prasad Rathore son o S handrasen Rathore aged abwt 3 ears Propnetor Sca o§txctan Chasma House) Baunathpura Ralpu 34 o 1996 Wnt Petmon No 7 f B f hn C 9 y n s ( r V$ ERSU ssxsta Labour Cammlssmner enra alpurDMsion Ralpur hn laKeshwar pun uoswa a m on of Shn Dhanra Goswamx apar Ralpu P Ci o di etition’ under At‘cicies 226 1227 of onsttution f lna _ Shri RR. Sihha, counsél for the petitioner, _ Shri R.NV Vyas,‘ counse! for respondent No. e, RL ORER OA D Passed on 2?“ June, 200? ( ) Learneounsei apearig both the parties info‘rred that. pare- é 'ri in to the comromise and threfore they do not wanio res this petition i he ; in the light of the aforesaid statement of the counsel for the parties t 1 i f ' r E HGH COURT OF‘‘ AH R Ant (Ctl) R S j Mtha r 2 " dp pn n tthe tis hi/ teec p e tt ps