1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD).No.7004 of 2011 S.Sankaranarayanan ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Joint Registrar The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies Madurai Region Madurai 2. The Deputy Registrar The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies Madurai 3. The Special Officer A-2401 Othakkadai Co-operative Agricultural Credit Society Ltd., Y.Othakkadai Madurai District ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondents to dispose the representation dated 07.10.2010 and on the basis of disposal the third respondent to pay the petitioner the retirement benefits. For Petitioner : Mr. C.G.Pethanaraj For RR 1 & 2 : Mr.B.Pugalendhi Special Government Pleader For 3rd Respondent : Mr.Ayiram K.Selvakumar O R D E R Mr.B.Pugalendhi, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 & 2 and Mr.Ayiram K.Selvakumar, learned counsel takes notices on behalf of the third respondent. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 & 2 and Mr.Ayiram K.Selvakumar, learned counsel appearing for the third respondent. . 3. The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition for a Mandamus, directing the second respondent to dispose the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 representation dated 07.10.2010 and on the basis of disposal the third respondent to pay the petitioner the retirement benefits. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that he is retired employee of the third respondent society. He has retired, on 31.05.2011. The third respondent has sent the proposal for fixation of the monetary benefits for approval of the second respondent and send it for approval to the second respondent, who is the sanctioning authority. But however, the fixation has been made without considering the new pay fixation. The petitioner therefore sent a representation, dated 28.02.2011, to the second respondent to consider fixation of the Secretary in the light of the proposal made by the third respondent. However, the same has not been considered by the second respondent so far and hence, the petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition for the reliefs stated earlier. 5. Considering the limited scope of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the claim made by the petitioner, I direct the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 28.029.2011 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Joint Registrar The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies Madurai Region,Madurai 2. The Deputy Registrar The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Madurai 3. The Special Officer A-2401 Othakkadai Co-operative Agricultural Credit Society Ltd., Y.Othakkadai,Madurai District W.P.(MD).No.7004 of 2011 01.07.2011 vsg SMA/18.7.2011/4C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/