IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2165 of 2011 Satyendra Kumar @ Satendra Kumar, son of Ram Chandra Thakur, resident of Pakridayal P.S. Pakridayal, District East Champaran----- ----petitioner Versus 1.The State of Bihar through Collector, East Champaran 2.The District Superintendent of Education, East Champaran 3.The Block Development Officer, Pakridayal, East Champaran 4.The President, District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, East Champaran 5.The Mukhiya, Raj Rajepur Nawada, Pakridayal Block, District East Champaran 6.The Panchayat Secretary, Raj Rajepur Nawada, Pakridayal Block, District East Champaran 7.Sheojee Sahni, son of Pundeo Sahni, resident of Banarjhula, Bhagwanpur Chaita, Pakridayal, East Champaran 8.Manoj Kumar Pal, son of Bhuneshwar Pal, Pakridayal, East Champaran----------------------------------------------------------respondents ----------- For the petitioner :Mr.D.K.Tandan, Advocate For the State :Ms. Jahan Ara, AC to AAG V ----- 2. 23.8.2011 The petitioner is aggrieved by his application before the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, East Champaran, having been rejected outright stating on the margin of his application “Rejected. Time barred for filing objection against Medha Suchi” under which the date 28/10 is given. The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority is expected to understand that it is the statutory quasi judicial authority appointed under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher (Appointment and Service Condition) Rules, 2006 and even rejection of an 2 application has to be made by passing an order giving reasons at least in short while passing that order and not making a note about the same in the margin of the application. The matter is remitted to the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, East Champaran to pass a proper order in accordance with law on the application filed by the petitioner. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) Spal/