FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3300 OF 1991 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ When this matter is called out, none appears for the petitioner. 2 The petition takes exception to the impugned order dated 21.6.1983 passed by the M.R.T., Aurangabad. The revision petition which was filed by the petitioner herein before the M.R.T., Aurangabad came to be dismissed in default. Thereafter, an application was filed for restoration of the said revision. That application also came to be dismissed in default. On perusal of Exhs.A and B of the compilation of the writ petition, it appears that when the revision was dismissed in default, at that time the revision petitioner or his Counsel did not appear and, therefore, the revision came to be dismissed in default. Thereafter, application for restoration of the revision which was dismissed in default was called out for hearing. None appeared for the petitioner nor the petitioner himself appeared and, therefore, the said application was also dismissed in default. On perusal of the Exhs.A and B, it appears that the order dismissing the revision petition in default was passed on 29th March, 1971 and the order dismissing the application for restoration of the revision petition was passed on 21.6.1983. 3 he present writ petition was filed in the year 1991. Not only that the petition was filed after lapse of eight years but, on merits also, nothing is stated in the petition so as to interfere in the impugned order. 4 Hence, the petition is devoid of any merits. Petition stands dismissed. Rule stands discharged. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) 05.01.2010. PLK/*