1 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3200/2004 Shera Ram. vs. Ajmer Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others. Date : 4.7.2007 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.GR Punia, for the petitioner. Mr.S Mehta, for the respondents. - - - - - At the request of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is heard and decided finally. Basically the writ petition involves several disputed questions of fact, therefore, this writ petition can be dismissed only on this ground. The disputed fact is that, according to the petitioner, he consumed only 25 HP of electricity whereas the respondent Corporation is claiming that the petitioner has consumed 41 HP. Because of this dispute, the bill was issued to the petitioner. This Court while issuing notice, directed the petitioner to furnish the bank guarantee for the remaining due amount. On this condition, the electricity supply to the petitioner was continued. 2 Since the matter could have been decided properly by the Settlement Committee provided the petitioner would have approached and since the writ petition remained remained pending even for admission for three years, therefore, the petitioner is granted indulgence and the petitioner is permitted to submit his representation within a period of one month before the settlement committee with the requisite charges. The Settlement Committee may decide the grievance of the petitioner within a period of two months thereafter after hearing the petitioner. Till the decision of the settlement committee, the petitioner shall continue the bank guarantee also. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya