IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 24808 of 2004 Between: G.Pochaiah S/o Narasiah Gowraram Sub-station , Siddipet Mandal Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 District Collector /Magistrate Sangareddy at Medak District. 2 Mandal Revenue Officer Siddipet Medak District. 3 Assistant Director, Land Revenue and Surveyor Sangareddy Medak District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction , more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus , directing the respondents to demark the petitioner lands situated in survey Nos.527 to the extent of 2 acres, out of 8 acres of land, in survery No.528 to the extent of 1.07 acres out of 7 acres of land, survery no.529 to the extent of 2 acres of land out of 12 acres and in survery No. 1008 0.29 guntas out of 1.18 guntas . Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SANTHAPUR SATYANARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission made the following: ORDER: The petitioner claims to be owner of land admeasuring Ac.2.00 in Survey No.527, Ac.1.07 cents in Survey No.528, Ac.2.00 in Survey No.529, Ac.0.29 cents in Survey No.1008, situate at Lingareddypalli village, Siddipet Mandal, Medak District. The petitioner alleges that due to his employment, he was away from the village and taking advantage of his absence in the village, the neighbouring owners are trying to grab his lands. That he made representations on 12-8-1998 and 26-9-1999 requesting the 2nd respondent/Mandal Revenue Officer for survey of his lands and, since no action was taken thereon, the present writ petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for revenue. Both counsel agreed for disposal of the writ petition at the admission stage. The petitioner alleged to have made representation in the year 1998 and 1999 for survey of his lands; he has not explained the reasons as to why he kept quite all these days. I see no reason warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, if the petitioner wants demarcation of his land, he is at liberty to file a fresh application. No costs. Dated: 24.01.2005 Dsr/Tvk ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To: 1 District Collector /Magistrate Sangareddy at Medak District. 2 Mandal Revenue Officer Siddipet Medak District. 3 Assistant Director, Land Revenue and Surveyor Sangareddy Medak District. 4 Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 5 Two CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{GR}