Crl. Misc. No. M-31507 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-31507 of 2011 Date of Decision : November 28, 2011 Surender @ Sunder .... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. D. S. Bishnoi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar, DAG, Haryana. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Accused Surender @ Sunder has filed this petition for regular bail in case FIR No.29 dated 29.01.2011, under Sections 323, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Rai, District Sonepat. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the case file. Counsel for the petitioner contended that the only eye-witness of the occurrence i.e. complainant Gulshan Kumar has not identified the accused persons including the petitioner to be the culprits, although he has Crl. Misc. No. M-31507 of 2011 2 stated about the occurrence. Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Zile Singh, admitted the aforesaid factual position. The petitioner is in custody since 29.01.2011 i.e. for ten months. In view of the aforesaid, without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case, the instant bail petition is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/ Duty Magistrate, Sonepat. November 28, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE