IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 5112 of 2008 Between: 1 Mr.Kiran Chandra Singh Deo S/o.Madan Mohan Singh Deo R/o.D.No.23-73-8, Nehrunagar BC Road, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam 2 Mr.Surjit Sing Deo S/o.Madan Mohan Singh Deo R/o.D.No.23-73-8, Nehrunagar BC Road, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam 3 Mohit Chandra Singh Deo S/o.Madan Mohan Singh Deo R/o. Mantripalem village Anakapalli Taluq, Parvada Mandal Visakhapatnam ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Tahsildar, Parvada Mandal Visakhapatnam 2 The Revenue Divisional officer, Parvada Mandal Visakhapatnam .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No.2 in granting stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the proceedings in Rc.No.107/07/SA dated 10.8.2007 of the 1st respondent pending final dispsal of the statutory and violative of Articles, 14,21 and 300(A) of the Constitution of India and violative of principles of naturaljustice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to dispose of the statutory appeals on his file filed by the petitioners on 23.2.2008 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.VENKATA RANGADAS KANURI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 5112 of 2008 Order: As against the order dated 10.08.2007, passed by the 1st respondent, namely the Tahsildar, Paravada Mandal, the petitioners state that they preferred appeal under Section 4-A of the A.P. Assigned Lands Prohibition of Transfers Act, 1977, along with application for stay, before the 2nd respondent, namely the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, on 23.02.2008, but till date neither the appeal has been disposed of nor any orders have been passed on the stay application. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: The 2nd respondent, namely the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, is directed to consider and dispose of either the main appeal or the stay application filed by the petitioners, and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously. Till then, there shall be stay of dispossession of the petitioners from the lands in question. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 11.03.2008 Nsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}