|T~ IV. ^1X?T Sukul Sai Paikara S/o Shri Sukhram Sai Paikara, aged about 37, Workiag as ,.D.T. fTribal Deo.i Govt. Primar-/ School Dandtoli, block-Kunkuri, Dist- Jasbpur(C.G.) RESP' of C.G. Through. Secretan'-, Tribal wetfare Dipartment Mantralava D.K.S. Bhawan. Raiour 'C.s 2. CommissioDer. Tribal wlfare Department,. pt R.SS. University Campus Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) 3. Asst. Commissioaer, Tribal welfare Separtment, Distt-Jashpur (C.G,) Present: SfariADiitKumar }fari Viaay Pands respondents. dey, Panel Lawyer for the State /' 1. (Passed oa 5L>1 ofApi-il, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for State/respondents iomtlv submit that the fact and auestion of law involved in the Rresent vvrit netition are th< to that ot m want K.I >ai t-orcorati 'JR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said su Accordingly. the writ petition is allovved in terms of the order passed in the case of Corporation, Dui'g and another (Supra), subiect to verification of the fact as to wfaether the petitioner has acquired B.T.I Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12. 15 01.03.1999 and whether he has been paid tv-'o advance incremeats or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK. Armt