IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2004 OF 2010 Between : The Sarpanch, Grampanchayat Ameenpur Village, Medak Distict. .... PETITIONER A N D N.Narasimharaju and others. …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 2004 OF 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order, dated 20.04.2010 in I.A. No. 149 of 2010 in C.M.A.No.04 of 2010, on the file of Special Judge for Trial of Offences under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (POA) Act-cum-V Additional District & Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy, in setting aside the order, dated 10.02.2010, in I.A.No.1668 of 2009 in O.S.No.400 of 2009, wherein the application filed under Order XXX1X Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. to grant temporary injunction was dismissed. 2. Heard both sides. 3. As seen from the record, the impugned order passed by the Court below, dated 20.04.2010, reads as follows: “Upon motion made into this Court on this day by M/s.M.Anjaiah, M.A.Rub & G.Prahudnyam, Advocates for the petitioners / appellants and upon hearing the material documents filed in support thereof, and upon hearing the said counsel, this Court doth order that you, the above named respondents are be restrained by way of interim injunction from interfering into the suit plots and with the construction until further orders. This case stands posted to 08.06.2010”. 4. After hearing both sides and considering the material available on record, the trial Court passed a reasoned order. Challenging the said order respondent Nos.1 to 5 preferred an appeal. During the pendency of the appeal, respondent Nos. 1 to 5 filed I.A. No. 149 of 2010 in C.M.A.No.04 of 2010, on the file of Special Judge for Trial of Offences under SC/ST (POA) Act-cum-V Additional District & Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy under Order XXX1X Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 C.P.C. for grant of ad-interim injunction. The said petition was allowed without assigning any reasons at all, which was extracted above. 5. Right to reason is indispensable part of a sound judicial system. The adverse party must know for what reason the case went against him. When considering the grant of interim injunction in an appeal that too the injunction petition was dismissed on contest by both parties by the trial Court, appellate Court ought to have recorded the reasons with regard to the prima facie, title, balance of convenience and irreparable injury. No reasons were assigned by the appellate Court while passing the order. Therefore, there is perversity in the order passed by the appellate Court. 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of directing the appellate Court to pass a reasoned order after hearing both sides and to dispose of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU. J SEPTEMBER 28, 2010. YVL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2100 OF 2009 DATED 21.04.2010