IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.33689-M of 2010 Date of Decision:20.1.2011 Sonveer .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Hari Om Attri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, D.A.G. Haryana. Mr. V.K. Jindal, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to register a case against respondents No.4 and 5 for cheating and fraud. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has pointed out that the present petition is rendered infructuous as a case FIR No.71 dated 15.1.2011 under Sections 420/467/468/469/471/506/120-B IPC P.S. Model Town, Panipat stands registered. At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.4 and 5 prays that he may be allowed to file written statement bringing on record the fact that the learned counsel for the petitioner could not file the present petition as earlier he was the counsel on behalf of respondents No.4 and 5 in another case. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the State, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. However, learned counsel for the parties are at liberty to raise their respective grievances before appropriate forum in accordance with law. 20.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE