'k< ^ i-^<7- 'c^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.SNo.....^..<>^.^;.... .../2010 PETITIONERS: ^^ ysy ^.^^ ..--"'}'¥^>' .'•''.^n^y RESPQNDENTS: Jitendra Shandey, S/o Shri Priyaram Shandey, aged about 31 years, R/o Village Bengchul (Patadi) & Post Telk^ via Bhaisma, Tahsil & 6 District Korba (CG) / 2. Amit Kumar Minz S/o Shri Hijnus Minz, aged about 26 years, R/o F-1362, Everest Vihar, HTPS Colony, Darri, Tahsil & District Korba (CG) VERSUS '1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) -2. Commissioner Land Records Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) ^3. Collector (Land Revenue Branch) DistrictSarguja(C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF c3 MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FQR_OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- -3^?T ^RT ^T1J<^ TT^TT 3ll^i 5b+l|ct» '3~ST ^ii'MKrl^, ^tll-f-I^Ko, f®ldl<H^< ^^.}M.l^:l^l^f..L^ *<j*iCTi 5t»*<l<^""""""'v""""""'"""""""/"""""^T^200 ^?T '<7^F ( yi^€t<^T) ^RiTW^Rf^T 37T^T SB : Hon'ble Shn' Manindra Mohaln Shrivastava, J. propess 27-07-2010 Shri Jitendra Pali, counsel fof Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Pane| advance copy. Submission of learned co^ petitbners had appeared in the post of Patwari in District Surguja oall letters were issued, thepetitior|€ therefore, they could not appear in was issued on 06-11-2009 to app^ and then petitioners appeared Thereafter, though the petitioners course, no such order was issi communicated vide letter dated 1i training had already commence|J petitioners cannot be sent for trainii| Learned counsel for the pe|titioners are meritorious candidate and theyj none of their fault. It is also subrrfitted order has been passed by this 09-04-2010 for considering casesj Patwari in Patwari Training School.l Taking into consideration t^ petitioners and that the petitioner^ 07-07-2010 (Annexure P-9) befor^ Gni^t<rt<i1ri "RTR^if ^T f^st <r»l^j< ^'3tRR37T^T the petitioners. Lawyer for the State/respondents on |nsel for the petitioners is that the of selection for reoruitment to the jnd v^re placed in the merit list. When lers did not receive the cal! letters, and ^he counsefing. Later on, another letter ^ar in the second round of counseling |i the Second round of counseling. txpected orders for joining the training |ed and now the respondents have i-02-2010 (Annexure P-6) that as the on 06-07-2009 and is over, the |ig. submitted that the petitioners |coutd not undertake training course for that in similar cases of hardship, (j^ourt in W.P.(S) No. 4550 of 2009 on for allowing in subsequent training of e aforesaid submission made by the have submitted a representation on the Collector, it vwuld be appropriate '%. .r'€ass I'^lgp^ .^, ^%^- ^SEE^HC-78 3T?^T ^ET RT11^ 'cT^TT ^^ 9^+li<^ Tumane ?^r ^JI^Kriq, ^tl|<-j^(o, [^<nj^^< ^.^(^^.^S^/)o *il*1^1 ^RI^i "^200 3Tr^?T Traw (^F^^r) I^TTW^Rf^T W^T ^ to direct the Collector to take deci! after taking into consideration all re the petitioners could not appear in any fault on their part. The petit representation to the Collector. On Collector shall take appropriate dec an outer limit of six weeks from the and representation, if any. It is made clear that if thi unredressed, they would be at liber may be available to them under the With the aforesaid direction, CM<l[<Tt<<i1T1 'RT^ff ^f "fe^ iFaK^K ^)'3tf?Ra^?T kion on the petitioners' representation evant circumstances and the fact that the first round of counseling without oners, if so advised, may file fresh such representation being made, the ision on the same expeditiously within date of receipt of a copy of this order 3 petitioners' grievance stilt remains :y to take recourse to such remedy as law. :he petition is finally disposed of. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ')^