1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.1131/2010 (Mahesh Chandra Vs. State) Date of Order : 09.08.2010 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. B.L. Bishnoi, for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Joshi, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused both the orders passed by courts below. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has filed an FIR for lost of his motor cycle No.RJ 19 SB- 0148 but in the final report filed by the police, the number of said motor cycle was mentioned as RJ-19 SB-0418 and due to this reason, the insurance company is not accepting the final report and order passed by the Magistrate. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is complainant in this case and due to the reason that number of vehicle has wrongly been mentioned in the final report, he is unable to get his insurance claim. 2 I have perused the order dated 10.12.2009 passed by Judicial Magistrate No.3, Jodhpur as well as the order dated 04.03.2010 passed by revisional Court. The revisional Court has observed in its order that wrong mentioning of number of motor cycle in final report submitted by the police might be a mistake of police. In this view of the matter, this misc. petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to file an application before the concerned trial Court and bring to the notice of the trial Court about the mistake of number of vehicle in the final report submitted by the Police and the trial Court shall consider the prayer of the petitioner and pass appropriate order after perusing final report within ten days from the date of filing said application. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J arun