IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3952 of 2009 Between: The Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society of Gondaboyanapalle, rep.by its Secretary, G.Narasimhulu and another ..... PETITIONERS AND Y.Jaya Reddy .....RESPONDENT The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3952 of 2009 ORDER: It is the case of the petitioners that they are the defendants in O.S.125/1995 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Vayalpad which was filed by the respondent herein for division of the suit schedule property into two equal shares, taking into consideration of the existing cart track shown as “BC”, bore well shown as “W” in the rough sketch and allot the said portion consisting of cart track and bore well to the plaintiff by way of equity and good conscious. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners herein filed A.S.2/2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Piler. It is further stated that the residents of Chinthaparthy Town also filed a similar suit in O.S.124/1995 against the 1st petitioner herein and one Y.Jaya Reddy to declare the right and title of the said residents of Chinthaparthy Town over ABCD cart track to reach their lands and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants therein from interfering with the plaintiff’s right to use the ABCD cart track and to direct the defendants therein to remove the obstruction of wall shown as X, XI in plaint B-schedule by granting mandatory injunction. The said suit was also decreed. Aggrieved by the said judgment and decree in O.S.124/1995 dated 31.07.2001, the defendants therein filed A.S.6/2002 on the file of the same Senior Civil Judge, Piler and both the appeal suits are pending. To club the said appeal suits and dispose of the same by common judgment, the petitioners herein filed I.A.118/2008 in A.S.2/2004. The lower appellate Court dismissed the said application by order dated 01.07.2009. Aggrieved by the same, this civil revision petition is filed. I have perused the order of the lower appellate Court. The parties in both the suits are different though the claim of the plaintiffs is somewhat similar and however, the question of clubbing of both the appeal suits and disposing of the same by a common order does not arise. I do not see any infirmity legal or otherwise to interfere with the impugned order. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 13.11.2009 Dsr