IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2009 / 1ST MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 32776 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- CHAIRPERSON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY, KUDUMBASREE MISSION, KUMILY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REGISTRATION NO.448/2002 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MUHAMMED RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. SALLY KOSHY, PUTHENPARAMBIL (H), ATTAPPALAM P.O., KUMILY, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. SALLY JACOB (VICE CHAIRPERSON), PERUMANNOOR (H), AMARAVATHY P.O KUMILY, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 3. MARYKUTTY JOSE, PORANKANAL (H) VELLARAMKUNNU P.O., KUMILY, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 4. RADHAMANIYAMMA, PUTHENPARAMBIL (H) CHOTTUPARA P.O., KUMILY, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 5. SOBHANA MANI, KALARICKAL (H), ATTAPPALAM P.O., KUMILY, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 6. SALOMI MATHEW, KUTTIVELIL (H) SPRINGVALLEY P.O., KUMILY, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 7. USHA RAJAN, MANNAKKUDI, KUMILY P.O IDUKKI DISTRICT. 8. OMANA SIVASANKARAN, VALIYAMADATHIL (H), CHENKARA P.O., KUMILY, IDUKKI DISTRICT. WPC : 32776/08 9. MARIYAMMA RAJAN, PUNNASERIL (H), KUMILY P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT. 10. THE SECRETARY, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY, KUDUMBASREE MISSION, KUMILY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REGISTRATION NO.448/2002 11. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 12. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1-R3,R5,R7-R9 ADV. SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU R11 & R12 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ----------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 32776 of 2008 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the Chairperson of the Community Development Society, Kumily Grama Panchayat. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is regarding the delay on the part of the 11th respondent in passing the order of renewal of registration of the society. According to the petitioner such renewal was necessary for holding election. It is stated that during pendency of the writ petition, the renewal has been granted and therefore what remains is the election. Now that the registration has been renewed by 11th respondent, it is clarified that it will be open to the petitioner to conduct election of the society. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm