IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. COCP No. 1197 of 2011. [O&M] Date of Decision: 21st November, 2011. Smt. Gursharan Kaur Petitioner through Mr. Y.P.Singla, Advocate Versus S.P.Singh & Anr. Respondents through Mr. Deepak Jain, Advocate for Mr. Amit Rawal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] Reply/affidavits filed by the respondents, in Court, are taken on record. In view of the categoric averment made in Para No. 8 of the affidavit filed by the second respondent to the effect that the amount demanded from the petitioner pertains to interest and penal interest for the period upto 31.05.2011 on the defaulted amount for the defaulted period, no case to initiate contempt proceedings is made out. Dismissed. However, the petitioner, if so advised, may approach the Competent Authority for redressal of her grievance. Rule discharged. November 21, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE