IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 3803 of 2009 Date of Decision: 13.7.2009 Amar Nath ....Petitioner. Versus Ram Murti ...Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. The prayer of the plaintiff-petitioner in this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to allow him to lead secondary evidence for proving the photo copy of the compromise by quashing the order dated 16.5.2009 (Annexure P-5) passed by the trial court. The trial court while dismissing the application for leading secondary evidence noticed that the applicant-plaintiff had not produced on record the documents which he wanted to prove by way of secondary evidence in order to show as to whether these documents were necessary for the just and proper adjudication of the present case. Further, the trial court has observed that the applicant-plaintiff had not mentioned about the said compromise in the plaint. In view of the above, no ground to exercise jurisdiction by C.R. No. 3803 of 2009 -2- this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is made out. Accordingly, there is no merit in this revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed. Nothing observed in this order shall be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. July 13, 2009 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE