IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 14840 of 2005 BETWEEN: 1 Vemulapalli Naveen Kishore S/o Late Jagan Mohan Rao R/o 7/1, Chandramouli Nagar, Gutur-7, Guntur District 2 Vemulapalli Roja Kishore W/o Naveen Kishore R/o 7/1, Chandramouli Nagar, Gutur-7, Guntur District ... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Superintendnet of Police, Guntur, Guntur District. 2 M. Hanumantharao S/o Not Known, Tenali III Town Police Station, Tenali, Guntur District 3 M. Manoj Babu S/o Rama Rao, R/o Door No. 50-117-10, North Extension Seethamma Dhara, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in directing the petitioners pay Rs. 4,50,000/- to the 3rd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and further direct the 2nd respondent not to send for the petitioners to Tenali III Town Police Station or to any other place and not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioners and 3rd respondent and pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.N.SRIRAM MURTHY Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SMT. N. (P) ANJANA DEVI SATYANARAYANA The Court made the following: ORDER: The allegation of the petitioner that the second respondent – Sub- Inspector of Police, Tenali III Town Police Station, is directing him to pay Rs.4,50,000/- to the third respondent has been denied in the counter filed by him stating that he never insisted upon the petitioner for payment of the said amount and all the allegations leveled against him are incorrect and untrue. It is further stated in the counter that the police never interfered with the civil disputes of the petitioner. 2. Having regard to the aforesaid denial of the allegations made by the petitioner, I am of the opinion that no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J July 3, 2008 DSK