IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15905 of 2009 BINDESHWAR DAS @ BINDESHWARI DAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 12.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that earlier a case was filed to the same effect by the complainant and attempt was made on behalf of the petitioner to reconcile the difference. She was in habit to leave matrimonial house for otherwise cause. However, complainant came to the petitioner’s house, remained for some period with all occasion, and later continued on her earlier habit. In the meantime, her earlier complaint petition was dismissed. For the same cause, present complaint petition is also filed without mentioning earlier filing of complaint petition. Further once the petitioner faced the prosecution for demand, how it is possible to again put the demand and torture alleged by the complainant and for which the petitioner is apprehending his arrest which can never be justified. I agree with the submission. In the discussed suggested facts and - 2 - circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikarahana at Motihari (East Champaran) in Complaint Case No. C 278 of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI