FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6459 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLCATION NO. 6458 OF 200 APPLCATION NO. 6458 OF 200 APPLCATION NO. 6458 OF 2005 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. F.R.Shaikh APP for the applicant. None for the respondent. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE,J. MHATRE,J. MHATRE,J. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 28TH AUGUST, 2006 28TH AUGUST, 2006 28TH AUGUST, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Application for condonation of delay in filing the application for leave to appeal is allowed for reasons mentioned therein. Application for condonation of delay, accordingly disposed of. ... FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLCATION NO. 6458 OF 200 APPLCATION NO. 6458 OF 200 APPLCATION NO. 6458 OF 2005 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. F.R.Shaikh APP for the applicant. None for the respondent. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE,J. MHATRE,J. MHATRE,J. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 28TH AUGUST, 2006 28TH AUGUST, 2006 28TH AUGUST, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Perused the impugned order of acquittal. It disclosses proper appreciation of evidence on record. Merely because a different conclusion on re-appreciation is possible, no case for interference is made out. Hence leave to appeal rejected. ...