IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3018 of 2009 Date of Decision : 30.11.2009. Kaka son of Bant Ram .....Petitioner versus Manoj Kumar .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Vijay Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondent- landlord that the appeal preferred by the petitioner-tenant against the eviction order dated 18.12.2008, has been dismissed in default by the Appellate Authority, Patiala, vide the order dated 25.8.2009. In this view of the matter, this revision petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner-tenant to seek restoration of the appeal as per law and thereafter only avail the remedy of revision, if so required. The petitioner may, if so required, seek condonation of delay in filing the appeal, under Section 5 read with Section 14 of the Limitation Act, which C.R. No.3018 of 2009 (O&M) 2 shall be considered and decided by the Appellate Authority in accordance with law. Disposed of. Dasti. 30-11-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE