1 n134-10.sxw pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Notice No.134 of 2010 in Execution Application No.10 of 2010 in Arbitration Case No.AR/BCB/MLW/203 of 2005 The Bharat Co-op. Bank (Mumbai) Ltd. .. Claimants v/s. Mr.Rajendra Tarlochan Kalsi & Others ..Respondents Mr.A.K.Moily for the Claimant. Mr.C.N.Gole for the respondent nos.1 and 3 CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 27th January, 2011 P.C. : 1. Respondent No.2 is not served. Notice under Order 21 Rule 22 is dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs so far as the respondent no.2. 2. Learned Counsel Mr. Gole on behalf of the respondent nos.1 and 3 seeks time to file reply on behalf of the respondent nos.1 and 3. 2 n134-10.sxw Service was effected on respondent nos.1 and 3 in February 2010. They should have filed affidavit in reply. That is not done. Request is rejected. 3. Heard learned Counsels on both sides. Notice Under Order 21 Rule 22 of C.P.C. is made absolute so far as respondent Nos.1 and 3. Execution to proceed against respondent nos.1 and 3. 4. Execution Application dismissed for want of prosecution against respondent no.2. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]