IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 8646 of 2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.08.2011 Goli ...Petitioner Versus The Financial Commissioner, Haryana, and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. S.M.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition is arising out of the mutation proceedings. However, Special Leave Petition is pending before Hon`ble the Apex Court arising of the suit for declaration involving question of title and possession. In the opinion of this Court, mutation does not confer any title. It is the source of the title, which is to be seen and mutation shall be carried out by the Revenue authorities, as per the ultimate decision in the civil suit involving question of title and possession. Since the SLP arising out of suit involving title and possession is pending, therefore, the Revenue authorities have to carry out the mutation as per the final judgment of the Hon`ble Apex Court in SLP arising out of the civil suit. This petition is disposed of with the direction that mutation shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the final judgment passed by the Hon`ble Apex Court in Special Leave Petition arising out of the civil suit involving question of title and possession. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE 02.08.2011 som