IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL THURSDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31326 of 2011(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.K.VIJAYAKUMARAN PILLAI,AGED 60 YEARS, S/O.K.P.MADHAVAN PILLAI,RESIDING AT RETNAGIRI, ASRAMAM PO, KOLLAM-2. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAVIKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOLLAM 691 001, 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, EAST POLICE STATION,KOLLAM 691 001. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO. 31326/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF RESIGNATION LETTER 29/8/2006 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2: COPY OF MEDICAL CERTIFICATE DATED 11/8/2006. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 8/11/2011 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN COMPANY PETITION NO.9/2011. EXT.P4: COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 17/11/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION. EXT.P5: COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 21/11/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K. HARILAL, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 31326 OF 2011 ------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. The petitioner, who claims to have been conducting finance business which according to him has been closed down for good, complains that several persons who claim to be creditors of the finance business are now threatening him. According to the petitioner every now and then so many people, who claims to be creditors of Business Benefit Company Ltd. with which the petitioner has no association whatsoever presently, are coming to the house where the petitioner and his wife are residing and threatening them. It is alleged that some of those persons even trespassed into the compound and house of the petitioner and caused some damages to his property . Even though Exts.P4 and P5 complaints were submitted by the petitioner respectively WPC.No.31326/2011 2 to the 2nd and 1st respondents, neither of them have taken any action. 2. As directed by us, Sri.Dhenesh Mathew Manjooran learned Government Pleader has taken notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 and we have heard Sri.K.Ravikumar learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Dhanesh Mathew Manjooran. 3. Having considered the submissions addressed at the Bar as well as the averments in the writ petition and the various materials placed on records, we notice that the petitioner has not chosen to array any one of trouble makers. Explanation of Mr.Ravikumar was that as they are legion, the petitioner has not been able to identify any one of them. We feel that it is not necessary that we examine the truth or otherwise of the averments and the allegations of the petitioner. As Ext.P4 is seen submitted before the 2nd respondent, we direct the 2nd respondent to take up Ext.P4 immediately and to conduct a thorough enquiry into the same. If the enquiry reveals that the allegations in Ext.P4 are correct, the 2nd respondent shall take such action as is necessary for protecting the lives and limbs of the petitioner and his wife who are residing in their house at WPC.No.31326/2011 3 Retnagiri, Asramam P.O., Kollam-2. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE K. HARILAL, JUDGE. dpk