r ^ -T^ Petjtioner NIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. HON'BLE SHRI I^ISHRA. J Contempt Case (c1 No. 190 of 2009 Ramkumar Sharma, aged about 70 years, S/o Late Shri Puran Prasad Mishra, Rtd. Principal Government Higher Schoo!, Camp 1 Bhiiai Distt. Durg, Present Address, Shri Keshar Kunj, Jawahar Nagar 221, Durg, Dist. Durg (CG) Versus Contemnor Nand Kumar, aged about 50 years workjng as Secretary Schooi Education Department DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Distt» Raipur (CG) Present: Shri Y.K. Rao, counsel for the petitloner. Shri Prateek Sharma, counsel for the respondent/contemnor. ORAL (TmJuSy,2010) The instant petition has been fiied by the petitioner with the ailegation that the respondent was directect to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 14.11.2002 within a period of four weeks vide order of Annexure C/1, hov^ever, the respondent has to compiy ¥/iththjs order as the aforesaid representation has not been decided. Frorn perusal of the reply filed by the respondent, it that the representation was rejected on 29.8.2009 (Annexyre R/1). After going through the affidavit of the respondent/contemnor as weii as the document of Annexure R/1 , this Court is of the opjnion that the order by thjs Court has been with; though with sonie deiay. However, in the and circumstances of the case, the unconditional apology tenderea' by the respondent for delay deserves to be accepted and Is, accordingiy, in view of above, the contempt proceedings are dropped and the Instant petltion stands disposed of. Dhirendra Mishra Judgc h