IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.1353 OF 2009 Dt.20.11.2009 Between: Anipakala Sai Kumari and others … Appellants And State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government Revenue and Urban Land Ceiling Department Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad Hyderabad and another … Respondents Counsel for the Appellants: Aka Venkata Ramana Counsel for Respondent No.1: G.P. for Revenue Counsel for Respondent No.2: Smt. G. Jhansi THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.1353 OF 2009 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Anil R. Dave) Being aggrieved by the impugned interim order dt.11.8.2009 passed in W.V.M.P. Nos.3754 of 2008 and 1455 of 2009 in W.P.M.P. No.13857 of 2008 in W.P. No.10591 of 2008, this appeal has been filed by the original petitioners. By virtue of the interim order, the learned Single Judge has permitted the construction to be put up on the land in question which is admittedly in possession of respondent No.2. Prima facie it appeared to the learned Single Judge that the land in question was vested in the Government in pursuance of the proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. In the circumstances, present respondent No.2 was permitted to put up construction on the land in question. By virtue of the impugned interim order it has also been directed that the houses which might be constructed on the land in question should not be allotted to anyone during the pendency of the Writ Petition. According to us, the impugned interim order passed by the learned Single Judge is just and proper. We therefore do not see any reason to entertain the appeal. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Appeal, W.A.M.P. No.2841 of 2009, filed by the appellants – petitioners for interim relief, is dismissed as infructuous. ______________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ ________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 20.11.2009 bnr