IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-12731 of 2011 Date of decision: 31.05.2011 Pardeep Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Mayank Mathur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Addl. A.G., Punjab. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Present petition is filed seeking regular bail in case FIR No.584 dated 10.12.2010 under Sections 302/307/382/148/149/120-B IPC and 25/27/54/59 of Arms Act, Police Station Sadar Patiala. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that complainant himself has suffered supplementary statement stating that Pardeep Singh's name was incorrectly given because of wrong impression and it was discovered later on that Pardeep Singh was trying to stop the fight instead of taking participation in the murder of the deceased. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, states that in the present matter charges have already been framed, however, prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined. He further states that petitioner is in jail w.e.f. 20.12.2010. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. Let petitioner be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. (Alok Singh) Judge May 31, 2011 R.S.