IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2148 of 2010. Anil Kestwal S/O Shri Shatrughan Pd. Kestwal. … Petitioner. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and three others. …Respondents. Mr. B.P.Nautiyal, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. N.P.Sah, Standing Counsel, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 to 3-State. Date December 21, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Interim Relief Application) Learned counsel for the petitioner files amendment application No. 10665 of 2010. The same is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The amendment application is allowed. The counsel for the petitioner shall incorporate necessary amendments by filing amended memo of writ petition during the course of the day. Mr. B.P.Nautiyal, Advocate, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permitted to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the election in question after the election is conducted. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP