C.R. No. 2520 of 2009 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 2520 of 2009 Date of Decision: November 25, 2009 Kesar Jahan …..Petitioner Vs. Issar Ali Khan …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Anshuman Chopra, Advocate for the respondent. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Vide impugned order an application for review of an order passed in application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC fled by the defendant- respondent has been dismissed. The plaintiff- petitioner had been directed to pay the advalorem Court fee. Counsel for the defendant- respondent has brought to my notice the fact that Court fee has already been affixed by the petitioner. C.R. No. 2520 of 2009 [2] In view of said circumstances, no ground is made out for interfering in the impugned order. Dismissed. However, it is clarified that the dismissal of this revision petition will not prejudice the rights of the plaintiff- petitioner in case there is an issue framed by the Court on the basis of the objection of the defendant- respondent that the suit has not been properly valued for the purpose of Court fee. In case, ultimately the Court arrives at a conclusion that ad-valorem Court fee is not payable in this case, it will be open to the petitioner to avail the legal remedies available to him in accordance with law. November 25, 2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE