IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.7824 of 2007 Between: Chaitanya Engineers Constructions (Regd. No. 732/1999) rep by its Managing Partner C. Bhoopal Reddy, R/o Yenkepally Village, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. … Petitioner And: Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdi-ka-Pul Hyderabad and three others. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri N.Bhavani Shankar. Counsel for the Respondent: AGP for Home for R.1 & R.2. None for R.3 & R.4. This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not taking any action pursuant to the registration of the Crime No. 648/2005 in the Jurisdiction of respondent No.2 as unconstitutional and illegal and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to see that respondents 3 and 4 are prosecuted and punished through due process of law”. At the hearing, Sri N.Bhavani Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration and that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as infructuous. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.10056 of 2007 is also dismissed as infructuous. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:10-7-2009 MNR