IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9244 of 2011 MD. WAHID @ MD. WAHID ALAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sekhpura P.S. Case No. 300 of 2010, registered under Section 4/5 of the Explosive Substances Act. 250 K.G. of Ammonium Nitrate have been recovered from the truck of the petitioner. The driver was at the instance of the petitioner being the owner of the vehicle, the alleged Ammonium Nitrate was being carried. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that Ammonium Nitrate does not come within the preview of the explosive substances but it appears that during investigation the petitioner has been charge sheeted in other cases of similar nature on that ground alone, this Court is not inclined to grant the anticipatory bail to the petitioner. A statement has been made in the petition that petitioner is not involved in any other case under - 2 - the Explosive Substances Act. Let the learned Court below verify of the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if the petitioner is not involved in any Explosive Substances Act case then the petitioner has fit case for regular bail. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed off. Bhardwaj ( Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)