^ L^- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH GOURT OF GHHATTESGARH ATBILASPUR W.P. fsy NO. bl?%3 /2011 PETITEONER RESPONbENTS ,A 4^ ^'y^ .^^^v <^-' RamQnuj Sahu, S/o Shri Ramsubhag Sahu, aged about 65 years, Retired HeadmQSter at Govt. Middle School, VindhyQchal, Block PremnQgar, bisft. Surgujd (C.G.) ' VERSUS ;1.^ State ofChhattisgarh, Through - The Sccretary/Tribol Wetfare Department, .D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. -Raipur ^ (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Distt. Surguja (C.&.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICL6 226 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF INDIA 1__^AKr'T^I-IJ— <^\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON?BLE SHRI JUSTICB PRITINKER DIWAKBR W.P.(S1 N0. 4883/2011 PBTITEONBR RajE&anU] Sab-u . Wersus • RBSPONDBNT8 . State of&G. & Anofher WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 22S/227 0V THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Apoearaaace: Shri Anil Siugh Rajput^ couBsel for the petitioMers, Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the State. GRAL ORDBR (25.08.2011$ Witli, fhe consent oftfae parties, fh.e matt.er is heard fiiiatly. The petitioner wa.s initially appoiated as AssistaM Tea-cfaer m. ffae year' 1973. on a fixed pay of Rs, 100,. After coxapletioii of his probation period, 'he was'graiited regiilar pay scale ofRs. 169-300. Leam-ed. counsel for tJie petition.er submits tha.t the above issiie - has been coiisidered.by flie M,P. State Adssiinistrative Tribiiiial, Jabalpur m O.A. No. 2745/89 between Madhukant Yadu aiid 56 others Vs. State of M.P. and ofhers^ wherein:: it was held fhat fhe siiailarly situated teachers ax-e exititled to regular.pay scale wifh effect from. the date of initial appointment. The niatter was taken up to tlie HonT3le Supreme Court. The appealwas dismissed by fhe Hon^te Suprem.e.Court upholdmg the .decisioxrof the Tribun.al to ihe effect that 'the Teachers/AssistaritTeachers are entitled to.regulai" pay scale from fhe date ofinitial appointnient It'is furfher subm.itted fhat tUs Court while considering the saine issue iri Wr.R . (S) N'o. 472S/2006 hetween Anzar Sw Ram & Others Vs. State af CMwttisgarh cmd Ottwrs by order dated 01.09,06 allowed fhe peti.tion.ers to niate a repre'senta.tion withm aperiod often'days, raisra-gaU the: ^grieva.ii.ces. ^r Accordiagly the petitioner is granted Ubeily to make a representation raisiag all his gneva&ces in fhe liglit of the aforesaid judginent aad the circular dated 27.12.2008 (Annexiiire P/4), and m. tura the concemed respondent is directed to decide tbe representatioii, if any, in accojrxl.ance with law, on its own merit.Sy wifhm. a period of eight weeks jfroia fhe- date of receipt of~ the represeutation subject to verification of fhe facte, In view offhe forcgomg, tihiis petition is disposed of 'No order as to costs, Sd/- PritinkerDiwaker Judge k\