CWP No. 16598 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CWP No. 16598 of 2011 Date of decision: 06.09.2011 Gurpal Singh ........ Petitioner Versus H.U.D.A. and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Vivek Suri, Advocate for the petitioner -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Prays for quashing of order dated 08.08.2011 (P1) whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Division No. 1, Panchkula to Division Karnal and order dated 01.09.2011 (P6), vide which, the representation filed by the petitioner has been rejected. While challenging the aforesaid orders, learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner is senior most Water Pump Operator in the Panchkula Circle and seniority list is being maintained at the Circle level. In case, the petitioner is transferred from this Circle to other, his seniority will be affected as well as his subsequent promotional avenues. It is further contended that the said transfer was not on the ground of CWP No. 16598 of 2011 2 administrative reasons and the said word has been wrongly imported while deciding his representation. Heard. From the perusal of the order dated 01.09.2011 (P6), it is evident that an undertaking has been given that the seniority of the petitioner at Panchkula Circle will remain intact. The petitioner has been transferred along with the post. As such, there is no merit in the argument raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Further, even the second argument has no merit as there is nothing on the record to show that there was any other reasons to transfer the petitioner except as stated in the impugned order (P6). Dismissed. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 06.09.2011 mohan