IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6912 of 2009 SUNIL RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- Cr.Misc. No.9512 of 2009 1. BRAJ KISHORE RAI 2. PANKAJ RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 01.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are in custody in a Police case under Sections 363, 368 of the Penal Code. It is submitted that the informant is the father of the alleged victim, who stated that his son was kidnapped for marriage. The impugned order of rejection noticed the subsequent compromise and acceptance of the marriage by the informant but rejects the prayer for bail on the ground that the offence was non-compoundable. Having considered the submission for the purpose of bail, let the petitioners, abovenamed be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur in Bhagwanpur P.S. case No. 121 of 2008. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)