IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. WRIT PETITION NO.2140 OF 2008 Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Karmachari Front ... Petitioner Vs Union of India and others ... Respondents Mr. J. Sawant for the petitioner. Mr. Ajit Kenjale i/by Kiran Kandpile for the respondent No.1. Ms. S.I. Shah for the respondent No.2. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., & S.A. BOBDE , J. DATE : 30TH SEPTEMBER , 2008 P.C.: We have perused the impugned order. Apparently, it does not suffer from infirmity of law as the notice of demand raising a dispute does not squarely and clearly state the industrial dispute which was proposed to be referred. The Government should consider the reference in accordance with the provisions of section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this petition with liberty to serve a fresh notice upon the concerned authorities clearly stating the industrial dispute, which needs to be referred according to them. If such a representation be moved, same shall be dealt with expeditiously by the concerned authority. Petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE, J.