IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12601 of 2010 VEENA KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 4.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State The petitioner is aggrieved because she was not allowed to join the transferred post which respondent no.9 was occupying. Subsequently that order of transfer in favour of respondent no. 9 came to be stayed for administrative reason. This writ application is filed by saying that a direction should be issued to oust respondent no.9 and petitioner should be put in her place which was the original order of authority. There is material to show from the counter affidavit that the initial order or orders were required to be re-looked into and adjustment came to be made. Since no violation of any rule or fundamental right has been established by the petitioner in the present writ application which has been filed due to her personal frustration against respondent no.9, no interference is warranted or a direction need to be issued in favour of petitioner. If the petitioner is interested in joining of new place of posting it is well and good or else the authority is free to decide what is best in the interest of administration. This writ application is disposed of with the above observation/direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)