IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 23RD OCTOBER 2008 / 1ST KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 31199 of 2008(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- VINCENT, S/O.ANTONY, KURUTHUKULANGARA, ANTHIKAD P.O., THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, NATTIKA. BY GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).31199/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner is the owner in possession of 9 cents of land stated to be a paddy field which has been lying fallow for so many years. He is aggrieved by Ext.P1 stop memo issued by the third respondent. He has filed Ext.P2 representation before the second respondent inter alia challenging Ext.P1. It is seen that the second respondent is any way the competent authority under the Land Utilization Order. I think it is appropriate that the second respondent, RDO, passes orders on Ext.P2. Having heard learned Government Pleader also, writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 application, after hearing the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs