IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7943 of 2010 1. SUNIL KUMAR SUMAN, S/O RAM BRIKSH SINGH, R/O VILLAGE- JATTI BHAWANPUR,PANCHAYAT PILAKHI, DISTRICT-NALANDA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR,PATNA DIVISION,PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NALANDA. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION,NALANDA. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,RAJGIR,NALANDA. 6. THE EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER,RAJGIR,NALANDA. 7. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ PILKHI,RAJGIR,NALANDA. 8. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ,PILKHI,RAJGIR,NALANDA. ----------- 2 27/01/2011 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State it appears that it is a misplaced kind of writ application where the decision taken by the Panchayat not to renew the contract of the petitioner as Shiksha Mitra as far back as in the year 2004, is now being challenged in the year 2010 without any valid or cogent explanation in this regard. In view of the above, this writ application is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)