THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY C.M.A.No.649 of 2010 Judgment: (Per Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This civil miscellaneous appeal is directed against the order, dated 27.11.2009, passed in I.A.No.2891 of 2009 in O.S.No.723 of 2009 by the learned II Additional District Judge, Rangareddy District. 2. Appellants are the defendants and the respondents are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.723 of 2009 filed for permanent injunction. Along with the said suit, the plaintiffs filed I.A.No.2891 of 2009 seeking ad interim injunction restraining the defendants from selling, publishing, generating, circulating, advertising or exporting any of the solutions under their names by infringing their copyrights, until further orders. By the order impugned, the trial Court granted ex parte ad interim injunction in favour of the plaintiffs. Aggrieved by the same, the appellants/defendants filed the present appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants/defendants contended that the trial Court granted ex parte ad interim injunction and that it appointed the Advocate Commissioner without giving any valid reasons and without serving any notice on the appellants and that the order impugned suffers from infirmities. He further contended that as the Advocate Commissioner seized the copyrights, the appellants are suffering from irreparable loss. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents/plaintiffs contended that despite the interim injunction, the appellants are publishing the reports and continuing the business by infringing the copyrights of the respondents. 5. We have perused the order impugned, in which, the trial Court while recording that after hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the respondents and perusing the material papers, passed the ex parte ad interim injunction in favour of the respondents restraining the appellants from selling, publishing, generating, circulating, advertising or exporting any of the solutions under their names by infringing their copyrights, till further orders. But, nonetheless, it has not recorded any reasons. 6. Since the vacate stay petitions filed by the appellants are pending before the trial Court, without going into the merits of the matter, we deem it appropriate to direct the trial Court to dispose of the said petitions by passing appropriate reasoned orders after affording an opportunity to the parties, within two weeks from today. Till such time, the impugned order of injunction subsists. 7. With the above direction, the civil miscellaneous appeal is disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J _____________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J Date:28.09.2010. Note: Issue CC forthwith. (Bo) sj