IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28760 of 2009 MD.IRFANULLAH @ MD.IRFAN Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Ishratnaz ------ 8/ 09.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Even after earlier observation by this Court about the act of the petitioner to remain absent after noticing the wife for her presence is repeated again which in itself appears a corroboration of the allegation followed by cases filed on behalf of him including divorce case. Because of the reason that if his cases were not justifying any settlement, why notice was asked to be sent. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)