i.a lu» / ^ (^(v^L IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. (^(t4- / 2006 PETITIONER -'^ \e^..--"^ S-:-t "^' .. 0<^'"!,'>' ..-' .^":K.^ ...•••"^;'>??" ^^^y ^•'^ ^•••" Saheb Lal kurrey, S/o. Shri Dallu^ Ram Kurrey, aged about 47 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Sonpuri, Block - Korba, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) s^-"" ^' VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through -: The Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director Public Instruction, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur ^ ^ ^o^-1 srus 3. District Education Officer, Distt.^ Korba (C.G.) 4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal /^ Welfare Department, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) 5. Block Education Officer, / Block- Korba, Distt.-Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA :^ HIGH COURI OP GHHATTISSXtfWAT BI.ASPUR SING1-E BENCH : HOWBLE MR. SATISM K. AGKNOTRI. A PeUttoner Respondente WRITPETITION <S.l NOAl14^3|i3flOB SahebLalKt.Brey vepsws. StitoolChhatBsgau'handothas Present : Mr.AnUStnghRajptrttCounseifertttBpatiBM^^. Mrs. Argu Ahtga, Deputy GovemmeiA ^jv<aate ftn- ttie respondente/State; ORBER (F^ssMlon 8th bfftoveinber, 2006) By thfepetitton undet ArtiGtes22K22? ofttieConsttaBcm of India, Uie pefitloner ^etcs a diiection to fce respontfents to ps^ the inerements and seniority of> ttie basis of the. dato ot Ms InWal appointmefrt in the ligtrt <rf the deciston rendered by the teamed St^e AdministraUv®TribuRal, Jabalpur in Orighial Apfdteatlon No.14S2 of 1^8 (Harid'f Gfianel Sivh andoffiwis vs. Sfate of M.P. ai^ effwis) dated 31-1-200), Ortgiial AwUcatton No.S^ of 19®(A ttesftJW^%B and <Mws vs. State ^ Matttiya Pradedv attrf ofheRs) and OrWnal Applteatton No.991 df19 (Rams^aR flrasaetflxwiselT aHSt oftaw vss: StateQlM-P. amt vrihs^). 2. Learnect eounsel aw^uring fer tt»p^onw (<ace< on reeoRt a eopy o( tha ordeK dateek 12-10-2006 paesad toy thfe Gourt Irr Writ Petttion (S.) No.5593 of 2WS6(.Smt. A^iaBMai(wwkau^iik)atKl anoffiier vs. State af CMieMisgarti and aSwf^ and submits ttat the petitioner Is similariy situated, therefore, the simllar order may fae passed. 3. The case of ttie peUUoner Is thrt he wa»appeint^^^ Teacher in theSchool Education Etepartment on probatton fora pettod of two years with the fixed salary. However, Istor on, after comptetion (rftwoyears' prebation, the pefifiener was reguterizad, bufc h»wa«nrt given the regular pay-seale. Othetsimilartysttualedteaehersmoved the State Administrative Tnbunat, Jabataur fw regidar pay^eale; wherein leamed Tribunat, vide orderdatect 31-1^000, altowtd ttie sama. The petitioner made several repFTCentaBorB to accord the same treatmentas he is alsosimilarty situatad teacher, but, the reapondenls havenot paid any heed. Thus, this petttion. 4. Leamed counsel for the peBBoner submits ttiat th® pefitionerm^ beatlowed to make a representaUon to respondentNo.1 togivesimilartreatmenttothepetitionetandUtesfflnepay-scalawhtch has been sanctonedto other similarty situated teachera on account rt the order of the Stete Administrative Tribunal datecl 31-1 -2@OQ, to which learned counsel for the respondents/State has no objecfion. 5. Having heard leamed cainsetfor the parties and having regardtothefactsandcircumstancesofthecase.intheopinionofthis Court, the limited prayer made by leamed counsel tor ttie petWonw appeare to be reasonable. Theretore, the petBioneris altowed to make a represents^on within a period of frwo weete tomtoday to respondent No.1, raisiRg all hls grfe^ances and, in tum, respondent Na.1 Shatl decid&thesatdrepresertationmanobjectiMemannerwiWnaperiodof 30 days from the date of receiptof suA fspresenteUon, after considering all the points rateed by ttie petftionar and takit^ lnt» accounl the order dsteA 31-1-20TO (K®sedt^ tti»laamed Stato Admini^raUwe Tribunal in Origlnal Applicatlon No.MSZof IMS.anctif ttie paBtionar stands on ttie same footinji^, as the peaUenars in tlw OrigjnatApplfeaUonNo.1452of 1998, th^ hetoftalsosanGttonedthe same pay-scate a»^saniority. 6. The writ p^ton is aGcorelif^ly disposed ofr vi^h thft aforreaiddirection. No.oKterastocosts; _— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Gopal