1 wp10119-09.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10119 OF 2009 Bhagwan A. Tamkhede & Ors ..Petitioners versus Dada A. Khupkar & Ors ..Respondents Mr.Vinod Jadhav for the petitioners. Mr.Machindra Deshmukh for respondent No.1. Mr.A.I.Patel, A.G.P for respondent Nos.3 to 5. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 22nd July 2011. P.C.: . The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 27th February 2008 passed by the State Government. 2 From a reading of the order (Annexure G), page 66 of the petition paper-book, it is apparent that although the petitioners name appears therein as an applicant and that of the respondents as the opponents, the petitioners have not 2 wp10119-09.doc been heard and yet the revision application is disposed off on merits. 3 In the light of the fact that the petitioner was not given any notice of hearing, nor was he heard, the impugned order cannot be sustained. It is accordingly quashed and set aside. The revision application preferred by the petitioner is restored to the file of the State Government and will be now decided in accordance with law. It shall be decided as expeditiously as possible and within a period of two months from today. All contentions of both sides on merits are kept open. Petition is allowed accordingly. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)