IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5211 of 1986 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- KANCHANBEN BHANJIBHAI Versus DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR KS CHAUDHARI for Petitioner MR VM PANCHOLI, AGP i/b M/S MG DOSHIT & CO for Respondent No. 1, 2, 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH Date of decision: 11/08/1999 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr Pancholi, learned AGP appearing for the respondents states that the petitioner has already received the following amounts :- Rs.5,000/- Group Insurance amount. Rs.4,900/- GPF Amount (Rs.9123/- GPF amount paid to the petition on 11.9.1998 vide Bill No. 1073 dated 24.8.1998) It is further stated that the following amounts are sanctioned for payment to the petitioner :- Rs.5,000/- Amount of gratuity already deposited in the Treasury office. Rs. 127-18 Duty pay for the period from 1.12.1981 to 13.13.1981 deposited with the treasury on 1.5.82 as nobody had collected it. The learned AGP, therefore, states that now it is for the petitioner to collect the amount of gratuity from the Treasury Office as stated above. In view of the above nothing further is required to be done in this petition. Hence, the petition is disposed of as infructuous. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. August 11, 1999 (M.S. Shah, J.) sundar/-