CR No. 6437 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 6437 of 2008 Decided on : 20-11-2008 HDFC Bank Limited ....Petitioner VERSUS Oswal Woolen Mills Limited ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr. M.L.Sarin, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rohit Khanna and Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Advocates for the petitioner. MAHESH GROVER, J After hearing learned counsel, I am of the considered opinion that the revision petition can be disposed of at this stage without issuance of notice of motion. The only prayer that has been made in the revision petition is that the Court should decide the application under Order 39 Rule 4 which has been moved for the vacation of the ex parte stay order and an application under Order 7 Rule 11 which was moved prior in time to the present application. The application under Order 7 Rule 11 strikes at the very root of the matter and therefore in all fairness the application should have been decided first. In any eventuality if the Court progressed with the proceedings then an application under Order 39 Rule 4 which has substantial bearing on the rights of the petitioner be decided even before entering upon application under Order 7 Rule 11. CR No. 6437 of 2008 2 Having regard to the aforesaid this revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court to dispose of the applications mentioned above as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of the receipt of the order. Disposed of. Copy of the order be given dasti. November 20 , 2008 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge