IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16296 of 2010 SMT.KATAKI, WIFE OF AMAWAS, RESIDENT OF R.BLOCK, P.O. PATNA G.P.O. P.O. SACHIWALAYA, DISTRICT AND TOWN PATNA. Versus 1. PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDH MARG, PATNA, THROUGH ITS TOWN COMMISSIONER. 2. THE TOWN COMMISSIONER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDH MARG, PATNA. 3. THE CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDH MARG, PATNA. 2 28.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of July 2009 as Sweeper under the respondent corporation, the retiral dues have not been settled and paid, even though, the same have been sanctioned vide Memo no. 412 dated 09.04.2010 as contained in Annexure-1. Learned counsel for the corporation submits that the claim of the petitioner would be considered without further delay as per law. In the above circumstances learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the expeditious disposal of the claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file fresh representation before the Municipal Commissioner of the respondent Corporation. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy - 2 - of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Amrendra/Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.),