IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1574 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: 31.8.2009 Kartar Singh ......Petitioner(s) Versus Balwinder Singh and another ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Amrik Singh Kalra, Advocate for the petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) CM No.20417-CII of 2009 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM No.20418-CII of 2009 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. COCP No.1574 of 2009 The grievance of the petitioner in this contempt petition is that despite the fact that vide order dated 5.4.2007 passed in Crl.M.No.20385- M of 2007, the petitioners were given liberty to produce all the documents, as relied upon by them in case FIR No.44 dated 3.5.2006 under Sections 420/406/120-B IPC registered at Police Station Badhni Kalan before the Investigating Officer and he was directed to consider and deal with each and every document before submitting any report under Section 173 Cr.P.C., the respondents however, failed to consider those documents when they filed the challan on 29.5.2007 before the Court and thus, have violated the aforesaid order passed by this Court thereby making themselves liable to be punished under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have COCP No.1574 of 2009(O&M) -2- perused the averments made in this petition. In para No.5 of this petition, it is the specific case of the petitioner that he sent all the documents to SSP, Moga vide his letter No.875-PC-4/07 dated 15.6.2007 as well as to DSP Moga respondent No.2 vide letter dated 875-PC-14/07. Thus, it is the petitioner's own case that he has submitted these documents after the challan submitted by the police to the Trial Court on 29.5.2007. It is the contention of the petitioner that he had approached the Investigating Officer along with the relevant documents but I find that there is nothing on record to support this contention of the petitioner in this regard. In view thereof, I am not inclined to take cognizance of this petition. Dismissed. August 31, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE