IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47531 of 2007 ANIL KUMAR PANDEY & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3/ 9/2/2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for O.P. No2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 24.4.2007 initiating proceedings under Section- 107 of Cr.P.C. The submission is that the notice for initiation of the proceedings is not in accordance with the statutory requirement of Section-111 of Cr.P.C. inasmuch as it does not set forth the substance of the information received, the amount of the bond to be executed or the term for which it is to be enforced or the number, character or class of securities, if any required. Learned counsel for O.P. No.2 seeks to support the impugned order dated 24.4.2007. In view of the apparent non-compliance with the provisions of Section-111 of Cr.P.C., the impugned order dated 24.4.2007 is not sustainable. It is accordingly set aside. The application stands allowed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)