IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9810 of 2010 Date of decision:25.05.2010 Arminder Preet Kaur ….Petitioner versus Indian Oil Corporation Limited and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ------ Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner. ----- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ----- K.Kannan, J (Oral) 1. The petitioner's complaint in the matter of allotment of LPG outlet is that he has not been awarded the appropriate marks for possession of property for godown. He points out that he has been awarded '0' marks under the said head, while the maximum marks permissible were 25. 2. In my view, even if the entire marks as provided for possession of property is awarded, it would not make a difference for the candidates, who have been ranked 1st, 2nd and 3rd have got 99.1, 95.0 and 91.7 marks respectively. The petitioner has been awarded total marks of 51 and even if full marks have been awarded to the petitioner, he will still not merit consideration, for, he will rank beneath the first three Civil Writ Petition No.9810 of 2010 - 2 - candidates referred to above. The petitioner shall have, therefore, no cause for complaint and the writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 25.05.2010 sanjeev