IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN Present HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD S.A.M.P.No.2066 of 2011 AND S.A.No.1049 of 2008 Between: Koganti Sikinder .. Appellant AND Gedala Bhagya Lakshmi & 9 others .. Respondents The Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD S.A.M.P.No.2066 of 2011 AND S.A.No.1049 of 2008 COMMON JUDGMENT: Heard Sri T. Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel representing Sri V. Rajagopal Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents and Sri A. Veera Swamy, learned counsel for the appellant in S.A.No.771 of 2008. 2. The process of settlement between the parties in S.A.No.771 of 2008 is stated to have not yet been completed. Insofar as the compromising parties to S.A.No.1049 of 2008 are concerned, the compromise between them has been admitted by the appellant and respondents 1 to 4 and the husband of the 5th respondent identified by the learned counsel for the parties. Subsequently, the legal representative of the deceased 5th respondent has been ordered to be impleaded as the 10th respondent in the appeal in S.A.M.P.Nos.2314 of 2011 and 2315 of 2011 and a fresh compromise memo also has been filed to which the 10th respondent had also subscribed. 3. Therefore, as the compromising parties to S.A.No.1049 of 2008 cannot be compelled to wait for the settlement of the other appeal, the compromise between the said parties to S.A.No.1049 of 2008 is recorded and the Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise without costs insofar as it relates to those parties to the said Second Appeal, who entered into the compromise. _____________________ G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J Date: 19th September, 2011 KL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD S.A.M.P.No.2066 of 2011 AND S.A.No.1049 of 2008 Date: 19th September, 2011 KL