9^ HIGI-! COURT OF CHHATT[S6ARH AT BILASPUR 'BLI JAG&ISH BHALLA.Ag. CJ. SATISH K A6NIHOTRI J. Writ Petition (PIU No.3931 cf 2007 ^!- ^: 2. Raju Sonkar, S/o Shri fiyanchand Sonkar, aged about 30 years, Secretary, AAanav Vikas Kalyan Samiti, resident of Mahatmet Sandhi Nagar, Opposite Janta Market, Bhiiai District Durg (C6) Ram Narayan Pandey, S/o Lote Shri Rajdeo Pandey, aged about 46 years, Member of Manav Vikas Kalyan Samiti, Bhitai, resident of Sector 4, Sadak No.IO, Quarter No.15, Bhilai, District Dur-g (C6) Versus 1. State of Chhdti-isgarh, bepartment of Town ond Country Planning, bKS Building, Raipur (C6) 2. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Nagariya Nikai Avam Vikas, &KS Building, Raipur (CG) 3. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District Durg (C©) ArticJe 226 of the Constitution of India x >1 Present: Shri Sunil Schu, counsel for the petitioners. Shr-i AS Kachhawaha, fioyernment Advocate for the State. ^ (Passed on 21st August. 2007) The following oral order of the Court was passed by 2. C.J. Heard. Petitionsrs had earlier filed one writ petition on the same subject iTsatter which was dismissed with liberty to avail appropriate remedy. Accordingly, the petitioners whose complaint is still pending with the authorities have fi!ed this public interest iitigation. Interest of justice would suffice if the complaint of the petitioners is considered and disposed of in accordance with law expeditiously. Wil+i this observation, tiie petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Acting ChiefJustice SdA . Satish K.Agnihdtri Judge subbu