IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6101 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 21, 2010 Kuldeep Singh …Petitioner Versus Gurbachan Singh and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Arun Takhi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that property in question is the ancestral property and if restraint order is not passed, defendant can alienate the same, claiming it to be a self-acquired property. Learned counsel further states that even if no injunction is granted, none of the parties is free to alienate the property during the pendency of the C.R. No. 6101 of 2010 litigation in view of the principle of lis pendens. He further states that if any alienation is made by any party during the pendency of litigation, would be hit by principle of lis pendens and plea of bona fide purchaser shall also not be available to the subsequent purchaser during the pendency of the suit. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. September 21, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2