hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO. 210 OF 2006 Mrs. M.H. Nandre ... Petitioner Versus Sudhagad Education Society and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. I.R. Kulkarni i/by Mrs. A.A. Agarwal for Petitioner. Mr. Mahendra Agrekar i/by Mr. M.V. Limaye for R. Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, A.G.P. for R. No. 3. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 03, 2009 P.C. The grievance of the Petitioner is that though the Petitioner is qualified and is working with Respondent No. 1, the Petitioner is not being paid salary of the post. Once the Petitioner is appointed as a teacher, whether the post is recognized or not, the respondents are bound to pay to the Petitioner the salary of the post. In the light of that, Respondent No. 3 is directed to serve notice on the Petitioner and Respondent No. 1 and to find out whether the Petitioner has been paid salary in terms of the pay scale for the post and if not so, to issue proper directions to Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to pay the Petitioner appropriate payment. The entire exercise to be completed within twenty weeks from today. Petition disposed of . Rule made partly absolute accordingly. (D.B. BHOSALE,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)