IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 19916 of 1999 Between: K. Satyanarayana S/o Adavaiah District Government Hospital, Rajamundry, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Secretary, Medical & Health Department Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Medical & Health Services Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad. 3 A. Ramakrishna Reddy District Head Quarters Hospital, Adilabad. R3 impleaded as per the Tribunal Order in M.A.No.984/91 dt. 1-4-1991. 4 K. Kishan Kumar District Head Quarters Hospital, Sanga Reddy, Medak District. R4 impleaded as per the Tribunal Order in M.A.No.984/91 dt. 1-4-1991. 5 V. Venkata Narayana District Head Quarters Hospital, Karimnagar. R5 impleaded as per the Tribunal Order in M.A.No.984/91 dt. 1-4-1991. 6 T. Narsimha Rao District Head Quarters Hospital, Nellore. R6 impleaded as per the Tribunal Order in M.A.No.984/91 dt. 1-4-1991. 7 Ch.S. Ravi Kumar MNJ Cancer Hospital, Hyderabad. R7 impleaded as per the Tribunal Order in M.A.No.984/91 dt. 1-4-1991. 8 K. Raja Rao S.D.Eye Hospital, Hyderabad. R8 impleaded as per the Tribunal Order in M.A.No.984/91 dt. 1-4-1991. 9 G. Rama Krishna Rao District Head Quarters Hospital, Chittoor. R9 impleaded as per the Tribunal Order in M.A.No.984/91 dt. 1-4-1991. 10 T. Samuel Osmania General Hospital, Hyderabad. R10 impleaded as per the Tribunal Order in M.A.No.984/91 dt. 1-4-1991. 11 Ramlingaiah District Head Quarters Hospital, Mahabubnagar. R11 impleaded as per the Tribunal Order in M.A.No.984/91 dt. 1-4-1991. 12 B. Yella Reddy Govt. Maternity Hospital, Hyderabad. R12 impleaded as per the Tribunal Order in M.A.No.984/91 dt. 1-4-1991. 13 B. Gowraiah District Head Quarters Hospital, Srikakulam. R13 impleaded as per the Tribunal Order in M.A.No.984/91 dt. 1-4-1991. 14 A. Laxmana Reddy Institute of Trophical Diseases, Hyderabad. R14 impleaded as per the Tribunal Order in M.A.No.984/91 dt. 1-4-1991. 15 G. Krishnaiah District Head Quarters Hospital, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. R15 impleaded as per the Tribunal Order in M.A.No.984/91 dt. 1-4-1991. 16 B.V.Ravi Kumar District Head Quarters Hospital, Nalgonda. R16 impleaded as per the Tribunal Order in M.A.No.984/91 dt. 1-4-1991. 17 The Chairman/Registrar Hon'ble A.P.A.T., Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order, or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of CERTIORARI CALLING for records pertaining to O.A.No.68767/90, dt. 13-4-1998 on the file of A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, and set aside the same in so far as treating the services performed by the petitioner from the date of reversion i.e., 22-10-1990 as Notional Service and fixing his pay Nationally as bad in law and against Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents to treat the services of the petitioner from 22-10-1999 (i.e., date of reversion) as performed service and pay him all arrears of salary etc., attached to the post of Dietician in view of the finding of the Tribunal holding the reversion order dt. 22-10-1990 as arbitrary and unjust in O.A.No.68767/90 Dt. 13-4-1998 on the file of A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.SUDHAKAR REDDY & NEERAJA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Sri V.Eswaraiah, J.) O.A.No.68767 of 1990 filed by the petitioner before the A.P. Administrative Tribunal seeking to set aside the order of the Director of Medical Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, dated 22.10.1990 and to place him for promotion as Dietician above respondents 3 to 16 in the seniority list of Dieticians, was dismissed. The writ petition was dismissed against respondents 3 to 5, 7 to 9, 12, 14 and 15. When the writ petition itself was dismissed against the contesting respondents, we are of the opinion that the petitioner is not entitled for any relief over the aforesaid respondents and others. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, this order will not preclude the petitioner to pursue any other pending remedies. No order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. ____________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J. 19.6.2009 kpr