IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.3817 of 2005 (O&M) Date of decision:17.12.2010 Sukh Dass ....Appellant versus Tejpal and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mrs. Kiran Bala Jain, Advocate, for the appellant. None for respondent No.1. Mr. Kunal Garg, AAG, Haryana, for respondents 2 and 3. Mr. Paul S. Saini, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? ---- K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. The appeal is against an award dismissing a claim for compensation in a case where the claimant had simple injuries. The claimant must have undergone a trauma of an accident and that itself must have been taken as component for awarding some compensation. The injuries are details in para 17 and they are reproduced as under:- 1. Multiple Contusions of varing sizes present over the left upper forehead and left side of the left eye. FAO No.3817 of 2005 (O&M) - 2 - 2. Multiple contusions of varing sizes present all over the dorsum of left hand. Advised X-ray. 3. Multiple contusions of varing sizes present all over the dorsum of right hand. Advised X-ray. 4. A laceration was present over the left patella. 5. Complaining of pain all over the chest. 6. Complaining of pain all over the entire back. I would think a compensation of Rs.5,000/- is just. 2. The appeal is allowed as above. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 17.12.2010 sanjeev