IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 260 OF 2010 GOA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ... Petitioner Versus MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M . S. Usgaonkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prasad Naik, Advocate for respondent no. 2. Mr. M. Amonkar, Central Government Standing Counsel for respondent no.1. Coram:- D. G. KARNIK & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 20th September, 2010 P.C. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Mr. Usgaonkar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 2 invited our attention to the averments made in para nos. 5, 6 and 7 of the affidavit in reply dated 2nd August, 2010 filed by Mr. Pravinkumar Shantilal Gosalia on behalf of respondent no. 2. He further submitted that in the affidavit in reply the respondent no. 2 has stated that survey nos. 35, 36, 46p, 51, 53/1, 54/1, 55/1, 102/4, 52/1, 54/3, 52/2, 53/2 to 53/5, 54/4 to 54/13, 54/2, 55/2 to 55/4, 101/1, 102/1p, 101/2, 102/7p and 102/8 are in possession of the petitioner( wrongly mentioned as appellant). He further submitted that respondent no. 2 has no objection for modification of the environmental clearance so as to exclude survey numbers mentioned in para no.6 of the affidvait. We direct accordingly. 2. In view of the above the grievance of the petitioner is redressed and no further orders are necessary. 3. Petition is disposed of with a direction as mentioned in para no.2 above. D. G. KARNIK, J. F. M. REIS, J. vn