1 SB Civil Writ Petition No.171/2008 M/s. Nakora Fabrics & Ors. vs. ADJ (FT) No.2, Pali & Anr. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.171/2008 M/s. Nakora Fabrics and others. vs. Addl. District Judge (FT) No.2, Pali and another. Date : 4.2.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.JK Bhaiya, for the petitioners. Mr.KC Samdaria, for the respondents. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of the trial court dated 16.11.2007 by which the petitioner's application filed under Order 11 Rules 12 & 14 CPC was dismissed. However, by the same order, an application of the petitioner filed under Order 14 Rule 5 CPC was also dismissed. But in this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order rejecting his application under Order 11 Rules 12 & 14 CPC. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the documents are relevant and will 2 SB Civil Writ Petition No.171/2008 M/s. Nakora Fabrics & Ors. vs. ADJ (FT) No.2, Pali & Anr. show the falsity in the case of the plaintiff and, therefore, the trial court should have allowed the application. I considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and perused the reasons given by the court below. The petitioner/defendant submitted this application at the time when his evidence was also closed and the case was fixed for the final arguments. Looking to the reasons given by the trial court in the impugned order, I do not find any illegality in the impugned order. In view of the above, there is no merit in the writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya