*1* 44.cas.1603.10.sxw skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1603 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 19 OF 1998 Rohit Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd. ..Appellant (Org. Defendant) -Versus- Dahyabhai Dajibhai Bhandari & Ors. ..Respondents (Org. Plaintiffs) And Anchor Electricals Pvt. Ltd. ..Applicant (Impleading Appellant) .......... Mr.N.V.Gangal a/w. Mr.A.N.Deshmukh for the Applicant. None for the Respondents. .......... CORAM : K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 7TH FEBRUARY 2011. P.C. 1 Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant. None for the respondents. 2 The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that as per the order dated 26th October 2010, they served the appellants as well as the respondents and filed affidavit-of-service. *2* 44.cas.1603.10.sxw 3 The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant i.e. Anchor Electricals Private Limited submits that during the pendency of the present litigation, they purchased the suit property by a registered conveyance deed, dated 30th December 1997 and as on today they are in possession of the suit property. He submits that if any order is passed in the present second appeal, their rights will be affected and therefore, it is necessary for them to come on record as the appellant. He further submits that as the appellant-Rohit Pulp and Paper Mills Limited sold the suit property, they may not be interested in the present litigation. 4 Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant and the averments made in the civil application, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b-1), which reads as under : “(b-1) In the alternative of prayer clause (a) above, Applicants be permitted to be impleaded as Appellants in present Second Appeal No.49 of 1998, alongwith the present Appellants.” 5 The applicant to carry out appropriate amendment within two weeks from today. 6 The civil application disposed off accordingly. ( K.K. TATED, J.)