THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5322 OF 2010 DT.10.03.2011 Between: Sheela Mahavir Prasad and five others ……….Petitioners. Vs. Deepti Jaiswal and six others. …….Respondents. O R D E R: This revision petition is filed assailing the correctness of the order passed in I.A.No.1712 of 2004 in I.A.No.988 of 2004 in O.S.No.31 of 2004, dated 17.11.2004 on the file of the First Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, wherein and whereby the application filed by the respondents herein under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, for sending the disputed signatures along with the admitted signatures for the opinion of a local handwriting expert was allowed. Having regard to the discretion exercised by the court below purportedly under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, no interference is warranted under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The revision petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ B.PRAKAKSH RAO J., Dt.10.03.2011 tjs