THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 18183 of 2009 Oral order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1-Warrangal Municipal Corporation. The petitioner in this writ petition, has questioned the proceedings dated 24.08.2009, issued by respondent No.1, namely the Commissioner, Warangal Municipal Corporation, putting the petitioner on notice that he will be evicted from the premises in question. As can be seen from the impugned order, the petitioner filed suit in O.S. No. 1329 of 2002 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Warangal for injunction against respondent No.1, which was dismissed on 08.02.2007, and the appeal preferred by the petitioner thereagainst in A.S. No.21 of 2007 on the file of the V Additional District Judge, Warangal, was also dismissed on 27.04.2007. Respondent No.1 in pursuance of the above orders, sought to take possession of the land, and issued the impugned proceedings putting the petitioner on notice that he will be evicted. The petitioner having lost the case against respondent No.1, now cannot question the action of respondent No.1 in seeking to evict him from the land in question. If according to the petitioner, he is the real owner of the property in question, the remedy of the petitioner is to approach the competent civil Court and prove his title to the property by seeking declaration of title, but certainly he cannot maintain the present writ petition against the impugned proceedings, which admittedly, is issued by respondent No.1 pursuant to the dismissal of the suit for injunction and appeal filed by the petitioner against respondent No.1. There is no merit in the writ petition, and the same is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to avail the remedies available to him under civil law. Status quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained for a period of one week from today. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 2nd September, 2009 KSR