IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 23649 of 2011 Date of decision December 19, 2011 Surinder Kaur Chawla and another ....... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Gaurav Bhayyia Gilhotra, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The petitioners seek for protection for life and liberty on the ground that they have performed their marriage voluntarily being adults on 14.12.2011, but they are apprehensive of being harassed by their respective relatives. The petitioners' complaint is that they have sought for protection through representation to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala. The issue has been dealt with by the Bench of this Court in Pardeep Kumar Vs. State of Haryana 2008(2) ILR 62. In terms of the said judgment, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala shall afford such protection as the law permits. 2. The writ petition is disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 19, 2011 archana