:!i>> "ia-HC—78 ^e'. :\;- T5T 'tinw^, ®Til<-i'i<o,fsldiy^'!, L<;.P.C^^O. 5L/o3/-^c« *iWW **trai sn^r 'cra^' (1pf3^?) ST^I^Tl^iN? iwan-^wqNp TOiTW^ft^an^r 3. 4. RESPONDBNTS 1. State Panch^ Raipur) f/f' <rii<iT^i<fli +iM<nf ^f 'fe^ <f^4^1< ^affiFfsn^r PETmONERS I. Chanc^ra Knmar Bhoi, S/o Shri Usatram |aged about 36 years, R/o vQlage Post Paikin, Block and Tah. 3^1i, Distt Mahasamund (CG) 2. Lalit I^umar Patel, S/o Shri Ayodhya Prasad [aged about 33 years, Post Kalenda, l/illage Darripali, Block and Tah. Distt. Mahasaiaund(CG) Kumar Bariha, S/o Shn Chaturbhuj [, aged 36 years, R/o viUage Manpali, putka, Block/Tah. Saraipali, Distt. }amund (CG) Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Lal Bihari aged about 34 years, R/o vUlage Post Singhoda, Block/ Tah. jali, Dlstt Maliasamund (CG) 5. Samp^t Lal Kafhar, S/o Shri Ganesh Ram. aged about 36 years, vUlage Post Singhoda, Block/ Tah. Distt. Mahasaiuund (CO) 6. Uttar (Kumar Pradhan, S/o Shri Goverdhan Pradh^n, aged about 36 yeai's, R/o vUlage Joba, [Post Pandripani, Block/Tah. Saraipall, Distt.jMahasamiind (CO) 7. TrilocJ(ian, Pradhan, S/o Bhasker Pradhan, aged | about 39 years, R/o village Khara|iyabahal, Post Kalenela, Block/ Tah. Sarai]j)ali, Distt. Mahasamund (CG) Versus Bhoi, Akashkhar, Saraipyi, Lalit E Patel, R/o SaralFlali, Rajestj Barihs Post Mahas Ashok] Sahu, Jaind^Ltkha, Saraij:) Samp^ Kafhat Makajfmuta, Saral^ali, if Chhattisgarh, fhrough Secretary, ''at Departinent, D.K.S. Bhawan, :CG) r -"- SK w, •S!».s£.;;L^ I-HC—78 WSV^ Wt* ?i«naiitngmw *<l*iyil th*llth 3^ "'.iiqiCTti, ®'fl|'y<i(c,fsldl'M^i ^y.C^"-^. S?^03/<5% •"^200 sn^'i'1!??? (lciid°i'\]Ei) i^nw^teon^i Jar(pad 2. The Chief E^ Mahasatn 3. The Guaran (toUector-cum-Chaimian, Education |;ee Scheiiie, Mahasaraund, Distt. Mahasa^nund (CG) Writ Petition under Artic S.B. Hon'ble Shri Dhirend Ov 26-09-2008 Mr. K.N. Nande, couns) Mr. M.P.S. Bhatia, respondents. Leanied counsel for th| were appotnted as Quruji^ services were disconttnued that in identical m.atter tnvo|l No. 1711/2008,orders has been granted to ftie the concemed aufhority dtrected to consider the Shiksha Karmi G^rade III on| and fit for appointments o^ law, and sunilar orders may| •^ ^tl<ltci'^l T?TO^ff ^f IT^ <[oi-t-^H ^siRnsn^T Panchaya5t Saraipali fhrough its ecutive OfSce, Block SaralpaU, Dlstfc aund (CG) e 226/227 of the Constltytlonof India a Mlshra, J. ;1 for the petitioners. /. Govt. Advocate, counsel for fhe petitioners submits fhat petitioners k for one academic session. Their |after one year. He further submits ^vtng fhe same question .bearing W.P. passed on 1-4-2008 and liberty to make representation before fhe concemed authority has been of the petitioner for appointaient as ifheir being found ofherwise qualifled 1 its own raerits in accordance wlth be passed tn this case also.^ ' havd been petiponers ardd cas3s x^h ^;!' "^ 'a' ^S:5'^sw^,. '\; e:1 "''HBSC!, "• '%,. ?ii"«PH@—78 ^31T^^5^ '3^'<1NI<1<1, 8)ll1yiS, fqcll^y ^.^^.^.^^/08 *11«1CTI th*<l<h SfI^T'TSW ('^f3^1ET) Sff^l ^iT f(j-)H ^STT STT^T ^WN? TCTTWaftff 311^1 Leamed counsel for thej petition is disposed ofwifh the In view of the submissioi) the parties, the petition is petitioners to make repres^ authority, who in tum shall for appomtm.ent as Shiksha law on its own merit. Leamed counsel for the documents annexed wifh fhe p( Office is directed to retiirh with the petition to fhe authenticated true copy ofthe ^, chi^<nifti ^wv\\ ^f fs^l <f^i^i< ^aifilTSII^T State has no objection, if the fcforesaid libertv. 4 made by the leamed counsel for (iisposed of with libei^y to the mtation before fhe concemed co^sider fhe cases of the petitioners K^rmi Grade III in accordance with jpetitioners submits that original |;tition niay be retumed to him. the original dociiments annexed fcietitioners on their fumishini taine. Sd/- 1 DhirendraMishra ^ Ju^e