c ^i^s^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION rStNO. 5^^- /2007 PETITIONER -4, RESPONDENTS :- ,/Banas Lal son of late Gedaram, aged about 37 years, resident of village- Jainagar, Post Jainagar, District Surguja [C.G.]. VERSUS itate of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Departinent pf Revenue, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.]. ^y oy^.^y' 2L Collector, Ambikapur, District ^^ ^3^y Surguja [C.G.] ^' 3]^- General Manager, South Eastern Coal Fields Limited Vishrampur, District Surguja [C.G.]. 4] ,Mst. Fool Kunwar, widow of late Aghnu, Resident of village- Jainagar, Post Jainagar, District Surguja [C.G.]. Birodhan son of late Matukdhari, caste - Rajwad, Resident of village Koreya [ Aamapara] Police Station- Jainagar, District Surguja [C.G.]. 6] Jeetu son of late Sajjan Ram, caste- Binjhiya, Resident of village- Jainagar Kansapara, Tahsil - Surajpur, District Surguja [C.G.]. "^] Bundela, son of Fool Sai, caste- Rajwad, Resident of village Aamapara Koreya, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja [C.G.]. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA r HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISQARMAT BNJkSPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISHK. AGNIHOTRI. J. WRIT PETmON(S.)N0.347 OF 2007 PetJtioner : Banas Lal veraus Resoondents Stats of Ghhatfisgarh and others Present ; Mr. V.K.Pandey, counsel for the petitfoner. Mr. ArvindDubey, Panel Lawyer fortheStato/ respondents Ne.1 and 2. CTtDER fl3assed on 22 Day of JanuE«y,2007) Leamedcounsel appearing forttie peBtioner submitsthat the petitioner groes up all other prayers except prayer made at para 7.4 in fte peUtion. 2. There is no reason why the authority shouM notconsider and decide the representaUon ofthe petitioner in accordance witti law. 3. Thus, this petition is atlowed to the extent of conslderaUon and decision on the pending representatlon (Annsiaire P-3) as early as possible, preferably within a period of two months. No order as to coste. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Sopal