IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14338 of 2008 DILIP SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 06.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is an accused in Madanpur P.S. Case No. 109 of 2007 registered under sections 409, 353 & 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The F.I.R. had to be lodged against the petitioner and some other persons, as is evident on a reading of the same when they failed to hand over charge on their transfer for a long period of time. Two other accused persons namely Arvind Kumar Singh and Brij Nandan Ram have been enlarged on regular bail. Petitioner’s anticipatory bail was rejected by learned Sessions Judge but he had certain observation to record even while rejecting the case of the petitioner which accrues in his favour. Keeping the entirety of the matter, petitioner is given liberty to move the 2 court below for regular bail and the court below shall treat the petitioner in a similar fashion as the other co-accused in the mater with regard to grant of regular bail. Anticipatory bail application is dismissed. Rajeev/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)