-HC-22 311^1'W R-)i.i* 311^1 stiuit 'g^I T -yg •a<|<<|d<4, •»TTlyi<i,fawiu^ sn^[ 'qsra? IIKCTI ai*<i<»i" ' ^BFI, 2fl0 'I^^ST' sn^r Wirar ^riCT HIuH COURT OF CnHATTiSuARH AT BILASFUR WRIT PETITIOtE (22'71 No. 3028/2008 l. i-Utuya t|ai, W/o yiui Kain Ufian, agea aDout FiO tr^Qysd Defesiilaat No.l Uistnct-ttaipur (Ctj) Defendaat No.2 2, Puna Bal uaste s^1 Abhanoub-. ^tnaini, R/o Viilage Gatapar, Tahsil- |r, Distt. Rnipur (CG) 1. Htate o} Clinattisgai'li, UU-OURJI: CoUector Qsfssidtssti No<5 T?Cii-nT*i rh 2. Jeevan L^l Sataami, aged about 38 years, S/o 1T><»f<»n<|aM4-N^ .S Budhhu 'l'altsu-K, a- nnicnin i 45 year nictnr-t-1 »v uetesaaat wo.q- . ^. unoia, R/o Kos^ .6 5. Budhu tt V?1QT^- l? SB: HON'BLB SHRI DHIREWDRA MISHR&.J Mr. As&oK Patil, co'unsel Mr, A.S. KactlJlETWfaa, Dy. J-leard. : 'l&is penuon is dUTected. 3.£>,.iiUU8, wnereby ttie applicajtion <ffl^^'ittTf TTW^rf ^ fsT^ <Fii'^i< ^sifigiisn^r R/o \^iU^?c- Rs.kislis- Yalisil Rsiitni W/o ..?^or^isTi_ aoed ^c^nt 48 vears -^—-.."—J *~Q,' *~/'^ notf P^i-nn^ fpr^\ Raia Sataaiai, R/o ViUage Koiaa, t]ica, Uistnct: Koitia t<JU) !>a-rt-> Q ^ <^i ClU-r^ M-!i«^-m d<a1r>i-i •C»<T(^/;! <^TT;/^IT(- •? l-r/ I-' i-'^.-u--^ 4. i-ijt-^r^ t^ii^u.^.iA^ v-^Q^-t-f. ^ l-u-r\/u.)l- i, K/o ViUage- Kom.a, 'l'alisil Ka]un, 'airmy IC^-C¥i l-"t"-"? \~^'"7 o .nijain »anu, agea aoout ao years, ^t, Tahsil Rnjim, Distt. Raipur (CG) fam, S/o Udasi Raia, aged about 56 o ViU&ffe T^f^Tnict Tsil^.sU ^a'l-*Tn- Di.st.t.. Kaipur t<4;U) WBiT_FBTlTiUNjJNUEK_ASTiULB2_27_UFTHB_CQNBTlTUTl®iUt' IfiUlA ORAfc OR U B K 16-6-200R t^r tlie peUtionei-s. SWtv. ueneral tor t&e Ktate. agaiast tlie order ot Annexure f-1. aated ot ttie petitioner tor aapummenj. ['tft^ y^ \ •^ :C-22 sn^T^i R-ii* 311^1 sti*iw ^rii^l s 3^ TWv^, "SrfrOT®,(tilKiy SW^ 'VRR HWVM Shllch ^ 200 ^s^ss' 311^1 TOIRIT ^rf?H 2--^ uncler umer iy Kule l ot tti^ fixed for final arguments. Learaed couiisel tor thii counsel ot uie petitioners/clelf Uiat'date aaa Uieretore, aaj^u: same was rejectecl by me uou|.t (Jourt coulct liave grauted last if peUUoners/ aetenaants. 1 nave &eard learnea from perusal ot me ua.pi|ij inatter was tixed tor eviaence cletendants sougtit vanous a4 niatter was aajoumed. at tlie| occasions as Uie wltnesses witaesses appeared for fhe p4 aitl not appear anu ui tGese 17 Rule 1 of ffae CPC was reje4 add.uce the evidence has been In ttie coasKlerecl opuuc(n comiiutted arw illegality or inpi uie unpugnea order junsdicUon under Article '££1<( r'etition is accprdmgly inriT warrattUn c()Tq[c'fiih •HT*t^if^ f^^ <^w.i< ^aiPaHsn^i Ur'iJ, was rejected and tbe m.atter was petitioners subinits that the ongiaal snuaats No. 1 to 4 couia not appear on aaj^uniDient was prayed lor. However, uie below. It is lurmer subintttect mat ttie fpportunity to adauce Uie eviaence to Uie co'ujnsel lor t&e peUUoner. igned orcler, it is ruaaitesUy clear t&at tJae |3t Uie aetenclants. yuice ll.ll.'^uus, Uie tjouraments betore tiie tnal Cdurt. 'l'iie uistance ol uie peunoners on vanons not produced. uven on a.&.'2UUB, no ttitioners/detendants, even meu- counsel :uiastances, ttie applicaUou unaer uraer tted and opportunity to ttie ctetenaants to flosea. ot Uus (Jourt, Uie Coult beiow fias not in|rmiiity or junsdicuonal error in passuig ig interterence m. me exercise ot lifthe Constitution oflndia. wtre cutc d^missecl at uie aamission stage itseit. -Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ['lf^ ^fo^