IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.7335 of 2008 Between: 1 Ch. Janardhan S/o. Ch. Raji Reddy Adilabad District Co-operative Central Branch Chenuru, Dist. Adilabad. 2 A. Srinivas S/o. Late Rajaiah R/o. 15-21-176/1, Surya Home, Balajinagar, Kukatpally, R.R. Dist. 3 P. Sathyanarayana S/o. Late P. Rajanna R/o. Chennur, Adilabad Dist. Main Road, Chennur H.No.13-8. 4 N. Narayan Reddy, S/o. Late Madhava Reddy C/o. Vishwashanthi High School, Near LIC Office, Adilabad, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Commissioner for Co-operation and Registrar of Co-op. Societies, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. 2 Joint Registrar / District Co-operative Officer, Adilabad, Adilabad District. 3 Divisional Co-operative Officer, Manchiryal District Adilabad. 4 General Manager, Adilabad District Co-operative Central Bank, Adilabad. 5 Singareni Collaries Employees Co-op. Credit Society, Bellampally, District, Adilabad, rep. by its Personal Incharge / Co-op. Sub Registrar. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the first respondent is illegal and arbitrary against the principles and quash Rc.No.12543/07-Cr.II-B, dt. 24.10.2007 issued by the 1st respondent and to pass such other or further orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.C.FRANCIS Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.7335 of 2008 ORDER: Petitioners question the order of the 1st respondent in proceedings Rc.No.12543/07-Cr.II B, dated 24-10-2007, in according sanction for launching prosecution against them. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the very impugned order, dated 24-10-2007, has been questioned by the same petitioners in W.P.No.26873 of 2007 and after arguing the said case for some time, their counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition and accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by order, dated 17- 12-2007. It is stated that without disclosing the fact of filing of the said writ petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn, this writ petition has been filed and as there is no permission to question the said order once again, the writ petition is not maintainable and the same is liable to be dismissed. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the petitioners are not entitled for any relief as the petitioners suppressed the material fact of filing earlier writ petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 25-04-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MSN}