IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2011 / 2ND ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 16083 of 2011(I) ------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------ NOYIL SASI, S/O. SASIDHARAN, ATOS VILLA, KAPPIL.P.O., EDAVA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695311. BY ADVS. SRI.B.MOHANLAL SRI.SAIJU S. SRI.T.PRASAD RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY, CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, REGIONAL OFFICE, NEW NO.3, J-BLOCK, ANNA NAGAR(WEST), CHENNAI-40. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, NEW NO;3, J.BLOCK, ANNA NAGAR(WEST) CHENNAI-40. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, M.G.M., MODEL SCHOOL, AIYROOR, VARKALA.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695141 R1 & R2 BY DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, SC, CBSE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P (C) No.16083/2011 -2- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS, ADICHANALLOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE PASS CERTIFICATE DATED 28-05-2007 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENTS TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE ORDER No.RO (M)/CORR/2010/CORRN/DB DATED 27-05- 2011 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P (c) No.27397/2010 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE AMG P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 16083 OF 2011 ------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF JUNE, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner wants correction of date of birth of the petitioner in the school records. According to the petitioner, his date birth was wrongly entered as 17-01-1992, instead of 17-10-1990. As per Ext.P1 birth certificate, his date of birth is 17-10-1990. 2. Learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents 1 & 2 pointed out that in Ext.P1 petitioner's name is shown as 'Sasidharan Noyil', but in Ext.P2, his name is shown as 'Noyil Sasi'. It is also stated that the name of the mother is shown in Ext.P1 as 'Bindhu'; while in Ext.P2, it is shown as 'Bindu Sasi'. 3. The learned standing counsel however submits that the matter can be considered by the above respondents, if the petitioner files an affidavit stating that the discrepancy in respect of the different names is only a mistake and that the persons concerned are the same. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the W.P (C) No.16083/2011 -2- petitioner will produce a certificate from the village officer, stating that the persons concerned are same. 4. In the above circumstances, it is for the petitioner to satisfy the requirements as above; on which event, the matter shall be considered and necessary orders shall be passed by the respondents as aforesaid, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within '8 weeks' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. AMG True copy P.A to Judge