J •jS;3i'^;?K'" IN^HE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR. W.P . N0.3643 /2005 PETITIONERS yuy /6<-.V ^A^ .• A€y ^'y ? //'^ -?''^/! .-y /''i/ •t'^-y <c RESPONDENTS 1. Daulal Sahu S/o Sonu Ram Sahu, aged about 46 years, R/o Village Budera, P.0. Kharora, Post Office, Kharora, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 2"..Baishakhu S/o Budhu Dhiwar, aged about 55 years, R/o Village Budera P.0. Kharora Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Kishun S/o Sukhlal Dhiwar aged about 53 years, R/o Village and Post Kharora, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department DKS Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ' 2) SDO (T&M) Subdivision PWD (BSsR) Balodabazar Raipur (C.G.) / 3) SDO (B&R) PWD Medical College Sub Division Raipur (C.G.) ^/4) Executive Engineer PWD Division N0. 2 Balodabazar Distt. Raipur. 5) Executive Engineer PWD Division- 1 Raipur -—3 il-i?!"ESW! ^- -V g_ugK>,|,Hi| saaaao ao sNouoaaia aaHAO ANV ao oj,a ravaouaao NOuialHoacT ^AMvaNvm^oaanAVN aiu; NI sAraM do aoNnssi^aT'vTaNi ^o NounxusNoo 3HA do 2,eer9ze ^3lAav~aaoNn Nouuad j,raA BE \3wi'<iiqin«;u>-^|<(i<is^R|ril<Hy'< ^:f.:^:...^.^^/p^.. HWV^I ^ffW .................^.</..^^<..-.r... W^200 sntST iraq; (tjclijd^) sii^?T!RiR'ii<i> craT3ii^?r**fi* ?iih. BTaT<R^iferaiT^?r 07-11-2005 :- W,P,No,3643of2005. Heard Mr. Ashok Patil, les V.V. S. Murthy, learned Deputy Rajput, learned Panel Lawyer f9r The petitioners were woi Department of Govt. of Chhattiss from service w.e.f. 03-05-2003 a1 years. Petitioner No. 2 retir< completion of 30 years of service; Learned counsel for the f^ in this petition is squarely cover< this Court in W.P. No. 2683 d matters. Learned counsel for the said submission. In view of the foregoing, order dated 15-09-2005 passed| along with other connected matf allow the petitioners to rejoin th4 age of 60 years, subject to dep^ them. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per rule^ tpl<<fn<I1i IIICT'I"^ffai^l '(Rf+dl't /^ ^53rf^T3II^CT |rned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. ^dvocate General with Mr. Sachin Singh fthe State. (king as Gang men with Public Works |arh. The petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 retired |ter completion of the service period of 30 ^d from service w.e.f. 30-04-2003 on |etitioners submits that the dispute raised |d by order dated 15-09-2005, passed by 2004 along with the other connected [State/respondents does not dispute the he writ petition is a!lowed in terms of the by this Court in W.P. No. 2683 of 2004 :ers and the respondents are directed to services and continue till they aUain the isiting the retiral benefits, if any, given to Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge SR/FS/2005-20,000 ^AJ^ y^