WP(C) 3557/2010 BEFORE HE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms Phuka n, learned State counsel appearing for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that though h e filed an application before the State Information Commission constituted under the Right to Information Act, 2005 the same has not been disposed of till date. On the basis of such allegation, the learned State counsel was directed to obta in necessary instruction vide order dated 1.6.2011. Ms Phukan, learned State counsel on the basis of the written instruction dated 6.6.2011 received from the Secretary, State Information Commission has su bmitted that the application dated 11.5.2009 has been transferred to the Project Director, DRDA on 21.5.2009 under Section 6(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 and thereafter the office of the Commission has not received any further c ommunication from the petitioner. The learned State counsel further submits that the Project Director, DRDA shall pass necessary orders on the said application dated 11.5.2009, if not already passed. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of allowing the P roject Director, DRDA to pass necessary orders on the petition dated 11.5.2009 s ubmitted by the petitioner and which was transfer to the said authority by the S tate Information Commission on 21.5.2009, if such order has not already been pas sed. It is also open to the petitioner to approach the appellate forum if he is aggrieved by any order passed by the Project Director. The writ petition is disposed of.