IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 396 OF 2006 GAJANAN S. PARAB, PRESENTLY POSTED ....Petitioner AT JUDICIAL LOCK-UP, MARGAO-GOA. Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF ....Respondents SECRETARY AND ANR., Mrs. Asha A. Dessai, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. Vahidulla, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondents. Coram:- DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 19th September, 2006 P.C.:- Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has been transferred as Assistant Superintendent of Judicial Lock-up at Margao. We have perused the affidavit filed by the respondent no.2. In paragraphs 8 and 9 of the affidavit, it is made clear that the Deputy Collector and S.D.M., Margao is presently functioning as Ex-Officio Superintendent of Judicial Lock-up, Margao and the petitioner is the Assistant Superintendent there. In paragraph 12 of the said affidavit it is made clear that the Office has already moved the proposal to the Home Department to issue necessary order for transferring the post of Assistant Superintendent from Sub Jail, Sada to Judicial Lock-up, Margao and the approval is awaited. In view of the above, the grievance of the petitioner is fully redressed. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents states that appropriate table and chair will also be provided at the Judicial Lock-up at Margao. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of. DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.