1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3567 OF 2010. Sunil Meshram ..Vrs.. The State of Maharashtra and others ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. ( Mr. V. N. Mahajan,Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Patil, Advocate respondent No.2. Mr. Sonak, AGP for the respondent No.4.) -0-0- CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & P. D. KODE, J J. DATE : NOVEMBER 22, 2011. Petitioner claims that he had submitted on line application form for appearing in two subjects of 5th Semester examination conducted by the respondent No.2 on 17/03/2010. However, he was not issued hall ticket and he could not appear in the examination and in the process his precious two years are lost. The petition has been filed on 21/07/2010 and this Court has issued notice on 10th August, 2010. It appears that, thereafter, the petition was dismissed on 03rd February, 2011 and has been restored on 07th September, 2011. 2 02) By way of this petition, the petitioner prays to permit him to appear for the 5th Semester examination and for recovery of compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/-(Rs. Five Lacs Only) for loss of two precious years. 03) The learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent No.4/College and Mr. Patil, learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 both are contending that no on line application form for the 5th Semester examination was submitted by the petitioner. They are relying upon their reply/affidavit for this purpose. 04) The petitioner is relying upon the receipt dated 17/03/2010, to urge that examination fees of Rs. 360/-(Rs. Three Hundred Sixty Only) are accepted by the respondent No.2 after due verification of his on line application form. 05) We have perused the memo of petition. There is no specific assertion that receipt is generated only after on line form is filled in and duly verified. Even otherwise, we find some disputed facts arise in the matter. The period of more than two years has been expired and hence the petitioner cannot now appear in the 5th Semester examination conducted in summer 2010. 3 06) Hence, we dispose of the petition with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings for recovery of damages or compensation, as per law. JUDGE JUDGE Deshmukh