1 AO-414-11-&-Ors.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 414 OF 2011 (arising out of L.C.Suit No.1831 of 2009) WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 586 OF 2011 Mrs. Nandiani Surendar Yadav ... Appellant (Orig. plaintiff) Vs. Municipal Commissioner, B.M.C. ... Respondent (Orig. Defendant) APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 411 OF 2011 (arising out of L.C.Suit NO.1830 of 2009) WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 582 OF 2011 Mrs. Sudha Ravi Yadav. .. Appellant vs. Municipal Commissioner, B.M.C. .. Responent APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 412 OF 2011 (arising out of L.C.Suit No.1829 of 2009) with CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 583 OF 2011 M/s. Harshida Rakesh Yadav .. Appellant Vs. Municipal Commissioner, B.M.C. ... Respondent Mr. Ramchandra N.Kachave,Advocate, for the appellant Mrs. K.K.Soraan,Advocate for the respondent. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 4th July, 2011. 2 AO-414-11-&-Ors.sxw P.C. 1. These appeals were preferred against dismissal of Notices of Motion for temporary injunction. The learned Counsel for the plaintiff/appellant states that the said suits and the Notices of Motion were taken out on oral threat given by some unknown officers of the Municipal Corporation. According to him, Municipal Corporation had not issued any notice for demolition or otherwise. Thus, there was no cause of action to file any suits. 2. In view of these circumstances, the learned Counsel for the plaintiff/appellant seeks to withdraw these appeals, applications as well as the suits from the trial Court with liberty to seek remedy as per law as and when cause of action arises. Appeals and Applications stand disposed of with aforesaid liberty. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)