HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.11289 OF 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is aggrieved of the proceedings of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapuram, East Godavari District, dated 20-04-2010, wherein, by one proceedings, authorization of the petitioner was suspended pending enquiry and by the other proceedings, the irregularities noticed against her were pointed out and she was required to show cause against the said irregularities within three (3) days as to why her authorization should not be suspended. 2. Heard both sides. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that already when the authorization was suspended under the first proceedings, there cannot be any show cause notice for suspension of authorization in the second proceedings. 4. Though, technically, the learned counsel for the petitioner is right, in the second proceedings the word “suspension” is mechanically used for the word “cancellation”. In effect, while authorization of the petitioner was suspended, she was required to show cause as to why her authorization should not be cancelled. In any case, petitioner appears to have filed her explanation on 26-04- 2010 and if that is so, there is no reason as to why the Revenue Divisional Officer has not considered it and passed final orders thereon. 5. The petitioner’s valuable right having been effected by suspension of her authorization, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapuram, East Godavari District, is directed to consider her representation dated 26-04-2010 filed in response to the impugned proceedings and pass appropriate orders thereon within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J May 12, 2010. PV