1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOBBY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.WRIT PETITION NO. 1454 OF 2004 CRI.WRIT PETITION NO. 1454 OF 2004 CRI.WRIT PETITION NO. 1454 OF 2004 Miss Surekha G. Jangam ..Petitioner V/s. Shri Shriram V.Bhosale & Anr. ..Respondents. ----- Miss Surekha G. Jangam in person. Shri K.V. Saste, APP for Respondent No.2 State. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : DECEMBER 10, 2004 DATED : DECEMBER 10, 2004 DATED : DECEMBER 10, 2004 PC :- PC :- PC :- . The petitioner appears in- person. She has placed reliance on the decision of the Apex Court, reported in 2001 CRI. L.J. 1264 2001 CRI. L.J. 1264 2001 CRI. L.J. 1264 in the case of M/s. J.K. International vs. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi, to contend that the opinion recorded by the court below that the petitioner had no locus to persue her application, is inappropriate. The decision pressed into service, to my mind, is of no avail to the petitioner. The court below has observed that whether additional chargersheet needs to be framed or not is the prerogative which has to be exercised by the public prosecutor. No fault can be found with the order of the court below. The question whether such additional chargesheet should be framed, if request is made by the public prosecutor, can be considered at the appropriate stage. No interference is warranted. Hence, dismissed. 2 .....