1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B.Criminal Misc. Petition No.737/2005 Satya Narayan vs. State of Raj.& Anr. Date of Order ::::: February 10,2009 Present HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BHANWAROO KHAN Ms. Rekha Arora for the petitioner Mr. K.S.Chandel, P.P. Mr. Karanpal Singh for respondent no.2. The petitioner submitted a complaint in the court of ACJM Uniyara, who in his turn forwarded the same to the police for investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. whereby the police registered a case for offence under Sections 231, 387, 406, 415, 420, 489 and 120-B IPC against respondent No.2 and six other persons vide FIR No. 82/2004. During investigation the police recovered motor cycle bearing registration No. RJ-14-35-1720. The petitioner moved an application before the ACJM Uniyara for the release of the motor cycle on supardginama to him and the ACJM by the order dated 10.9.2004 ordered release of the motor cycle in favour of the 2 petitioner with the condition that the vehicle be released in favour of the petitioner if the petitioner submits Registration Certificate, Insurance and Driving Licence in his name in the court within one month. But the petitioner has failed to produce the RC, Driving Licence and insurance Policy in his name up to 1.3.2005 therefore, the ACJM vide order dated 1.3.2005 forfeited the Superdginama and personal bond and directed the SHO concerned to seize the motor cycle as the petitioner has failed to comply with the conditions imposed by the court. Feeling aggrieved of this order, the petitioner has filed the present Misc. Petition for setting aside the condition no.4 imposed in the order dated 10.9.2004 and also for quashing the order dated 1.3.2005. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned P.P. and learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2 and perused the impugned orders. It is true that the trial court while releasing any vehicle on supardginama may impose any condition. In the instant case, it was indeed for the satisfaction of the trial court to have seen the relevant documents regarding ownership 3 of the vehicle and also valid documents to ply the vehicle on the road. Insurance Policy and Driving Licence are the necessary documents to ply the vehicle on the road. Thus, I am of the opinion that if the trial court has imposed condition of producing the Registration Certificate, Insurance Policy and Driving License, the trial court has committed no illegality and has acted within its judicial competence. Therefore, no interference is required to be called for in the order of the trial court by this Court while exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The petition devoid of any merit deserves to be dismissed. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed. (Bhanwaroo Khan),J. bairwa 4 S.B.Criminal Misc. Stay Application No.737/2005 in S.B.Criminal Misc. Petition No.737/2005 Satya Narayan vs. State of Raj.& Anr. Date of Order ::::: February 10,2009 Present HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BHANWAROO KHAN Ms. Rekha Arora for the petitioner Mr. K.S.Chandel, P.P. Mr. Karanpal Singh for respondent no.2. Since the main petition has been dismissed, this stay application also stands dismissed. (Bhanwaroo Khan),J. bairwa