HEGH COURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT 3ELE3§3L§R DEVI3IQM SENGH HON’ELE 3HR! HrL. DATTLI, QJ. & HGN’BLE SHRI DR. DESHMUKH, J. CQRAM: WRIT PETiTiON No.31 76 of 2&94 §ET§T§GNER Rajesh M%$hra UPS} aged about 40 years Sfc Late Shrf MP. Mishra presentfy working as Deputy Inspector General of Police: Police Headquarter, Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Versus Union of lndia through The Principal Seortary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi HO 001. State of Madhya Pradesh through The Secretary Deparément of Home Affairs Vallabh Bhopal Bhopa (ll/LP.) State of Chhattisgarh 'throuqh The Secretary Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Bnawan‘, Mantralaya Ralpur (Chnattlsgarh) Srl SP Pandey (FPS) AIG, PHQ, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesn. Srl S. lbrahim (IPS) Joint Director, Intelligence Bureau (Ministry of Home Affairs, North Block, New Delhi) Sri AK Dhasmana (IPS) Joint Director (RAW) Research & Analysis Wing Through: The Home Secretary, Government of lndia, Ministly of Home Affairs, North Block, New Delhi Sri Vijay Kumar Singh (IPS) l.G. Jabalpur Range, Jabaipur Madhya Pradesh Sri Raiendra Kumar UPS) !.G. Sager Range, Sagar Madhya Pradeeh. Sri Dr. SK. Shrivastava (IPS) lG, lndore Range, lndore, Madhya. Pradesh, err eanjiv Kumar‘Signh (IPS) Dy. Transport Commiesioner, Gwalior, Office of Transport Commissioner, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh. Sri Sesnowaii Banerjee (IPS) DIG EOW (Economical Offence Wing) H“‘3 Floor Vind'nyao'nal Bhawan, Madhya Pradeehr Me, A Shanker (1P8) DIG, Bhopal Range, Bhopal, Madhya Pradeeh. $ri PK. Shrivaetava (IPS) Superintendent of Police, (Anti Corruption) CBI, CB1 Headquarter, New Delhi RESPGNQENT$ ‘1 . h.7 14‘ Sri Rajiv Kumar Gupt& (PS) Superintendent of Poucel Murena, District Murena, Madhva PradEsh. 15. sra Raja Babu Si‘ngh (P8) A16 (intelligence), PHQ Bhepai Madhy‘a radesh‘ 16. 8n K. Vaiphei (IPS) DIG {Narcotiss} indore District indore, Madhya Pradesh. ”i7. sri DO Sagar (IPS) Superintendent of Poiice Khandwa, District Khandwa Madhya Pradeshi 18. Mend. Shahid Abrar (IPS) Superintendeni of Paiice Katni. District Katni, Madnya Pradeeh 19. Vie‘nwararijanl (PS OP. Rathore, IPS Praveen Mahendru. iP$ 22. Anii iv}. Navaney, IPS Ram Niwas. [PS 24. MW. Ansari, IPS 25. AN Upadhyay, IPS 26. BM. Awaethi, IPS ' Binay Kumar Sirigh, IPS 28. Aehok Jurieja. IPS 29, Arundea Gautam, {PS 30. GurjinderPai Singh. IPS 31. T.J. Langkumar, IPS Vivekanand. IPS CEO Director Generai of eiice} Chhattisgar'n Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Writ petition under Articles 2261227 cf the Constitution of indie. Present : Shri VG. Tamaskar and Shri RanbirSingh Mamas, oounsei for the petitioner. I Shri SK. Beriwai, Standing Counsei for Union of ind‘ialrespondent No. 'i. Shri Samdarsh Tiwari, Govt. Advocate for respondent No.218tate of MP‘ Shri 8umesh Bajai, Govt. Advocate for respondent No.3!State. Shri MK. Verma, couneel for respondents No. 7 to 12 & 15 and 1'7. S‘nri VR. Tiwaré. counsei for respondents No. 24, 25, 29 8i 30. . DRAL §3RD=R (Passed on mm Agni, 2w?) The foiiowing oral order of the Cour? was paesegl by ELL. Betta, Q}. The petitioner is a Poiice Officer. He beionge to the cadre of LPS. {2) The petitioner has tiiecl this writ petition inter aiia requeming this Court to direct the respondent No.1!Union of indie to pass appropriate orders P purwant £0 fix deo§sion taken in ccmpnance of the order passed by the Centrai Adminis‘crwve Tribuna! (“the Tribunal” fOr short). (3) This Court whiie entexiaining the writ petition had iri faci directed the respahdents to pass appropriate orders Withih a particular time-frame New it is brought to ouiLnotioe by learned counset appearing for the respondents that the Centra! Goverhment hae taken a decision in the matter and the same is communicated to the petitioner also. Therefore, they submit that, if ’or any reason, the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Central Government: he has to question the Same before a Forum created under the Administrative Tribunals Act. (4) However, Shri V.G_ Tamaekar, learned oouneei appearing for the petitioner strenuouely contends before this Court that this Court having entertained the writ petition, now the petitioner should not be relegated to the Tribunal to question the correctneee or otherwise of the order passed by the Centrai Government. We are not impressed by the argument canvaseed by learned oounsei for the petitioner. Ae we have aiready noticed, the petitioner was before this Court only for a direction to the reepondente to consider his case and pass appropriate order in accordance with law. During the pendency of the writ petition, the respondents have passed an order and if for any reason the petitioner is aggrieved by that order he has to question the same before the Forum created under the provisions of the Administrative Tribunals Act. (é) ln View 0t the above, we dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner, it he so desires, to question the correctness or otherwise of the hnal order passed by the Central Government dated 27-06—2005 before the e appropriate Forum. Ordered accordingly Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukhi Sd/- Judge