... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.915 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.915 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.915 OF 2007 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Amit B. Borkar for the Petitioner. Shri Tejpal S. Ingle for the Respondent No.1. Shri M.S.Lagu for the Respondent No.10. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 12, 2007. DATE : FEBRUARY 12, 2007. DATE : FEBRUARY 12, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. By this Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner has taken exception to an order passed by the District Court by which an order of the trial court of rejecting an Application for temporary injunction made by the Petitioner has been confirmed. The Petitioner is claiming to be in possession of final plot No.37. The said final plot is governed by a Town Planning Scheme under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Under the scheme, the Petitioner is not the allottee of the said plot. As of today prima facie, the Petitioner has no ... 2 ... right, title and interest in respect of the said plot. Hence, no interference can be made with the discretionary orders passed by the courts below. Writ Petition is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE