IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33804 of 2010 BABOOJI SAHNI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 28.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. Petitioner is husband of the deceased alleged for killing her. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that there is no material to connect him in the killing; two of his family members faced trial and acquitted by Sessions Judge, where deceased’s all three sons examined and stated about death due to consumption of some substance by the deceased deviating their statement under section 161 of the Cr. P. C. Petitioner was out of the custody certainly was behind their deviation which is apparently wrong as post mortem is conducted showing head injury to the deceased, initiative, may be taken for giving false statement by the sons, but no bail to this petitioner. Accordingly, petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)