IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1451 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 5, 2010 Reena and others …Petitioners Versus Amolak Singh and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present: Mr. Amardeep Singh Gill, Advocate, for the petitioners. S.D.Anand, J. A plea raised by the respondent-landlord for ejectment of the petitioner tenant from the tenanted premises, on an averment of personal necessity, came to be allowed by the learned Rent Controller and that finding, in turn, came to be affirmed by the learned Appellate Authority. The petition had been filed by the respondent- landlord against Ashok Kumar-tenant, husband of Mst. Reena and father of other petitioners. Ashok Kumar died during the pendency of the trial. Petitioner – Reena is, thus, a widowed mother of her two minor children. C.R. No. 1451 of 2010 Learned counsel states that he does not wish to press the petition. However, he requests for little extra time to vacate the tenanted premises in view of the fact that Ashok Kumar, husband of petitioner no.1, died on 22.04.2009 during the pendency of the appeal before the learned Appellate Authority and the petitioners are his wife and two minor children. His daughter and son are studying in 8th and 5th standard respectively. In the peculiar facts of this case, this petition shall stand dismissed. However, the petitioners herein shall have 1-1/2 years time from today to vacate the tenanted premises. It is agreed that the petitioner would keep on paying the rent regularly by 10th of every calendar month, in the meantime. March 05, 2010 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2