O ’'‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR ' 1900'of 200'1 Petitioner Ravi Chandra Saxena, Sfo ate S.B. Saxena, Aged 64 years, Retired as Professor (Commerce), C.M.D. College, ‘Bilaspur, R/ o Vinoba Nagar, Near Gaitii Mandir, Bilaspue (co). Versus Respondens ‘ :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Mantralaya, Raipur (C. G.). Commissioner, Higher Education, Raipur (C.G.). . Governing Body] Managing Committee, C. M. D. College, Bilaspur. Single Bench Hn’ble’ M Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Shn' Asish Shvastava, counsel for the Petitioner. h ri i hi, l/ te Shr Alok Baks Government Advocate for the respondent No. ‘ Sta. - None for the rndents No. 2 and 3. espo ORDER _ (3 lat January, 2006) Lerned counsel for e petitioner submits that the petitioner, who retired as PfesSor (Corce) from C.M.D. College, VBilaspur, has fild this peition prayin that the petitioner is entitled to leave eashment beneht equivalent to 79 days of earned leave. He has urther prayed fo intet on the said amount. The petitioner has fther payed or uashg of thevimpugned letter dated 13.7.2000 (nexur P—2). Ane aended the Circular dated 9th July, 19854 Th petitioner as (nexe PG) wherein it is clearly/provideglhat l 1 ‘ the teachers . and .M i. “M ”m" “shimmer“; HIGH CURT OF .CHHAII Wnt Petition No. L t 3 : o r. nRAL a th ro mme e t g nc f r res ur r f qin e h Anur , pp other employees of Government aided institutions are entitled to the same benefits of house rent allowance, leave encashment and pay as the teachers and employees of the Govemment Institutions. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no information about these circulars. In the present case, notice was issued on 1.5.2002, the respondents have failed to tile reply till date. In the matter prima—facie, it appears that the petitioner is governed by circular dated 9.7. 1985 (Annexure 13-3). In view of afore stated facts, the respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, if any, made by the petitioner. 5. The writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. No order as to costs. i ‘ Sdl- i I 1 ' Z i Satish K.Agnihotri " 1 A ,4