IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21699 of 2011 1.Nand Lal Sharma, Son of Late Fakru Mistri. 2.Rakesh Sharma, Son of Nand Lal Sharma. Both Resident of Ashok Nagar, Western ‘C’ Ram Lakhan Path, Road No. 8, P.S. Kankarbag – 20, P.O. Lohia Nagar, District Patna. ---------- Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -------- Opposite Party ----------- 03/- 05/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the complainant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioners. The two petitioners apprehend their arrest, in connection with Complaint Case No. 695C of 2008 for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Nalanda at Biharsharif, are named accused in this case, wherein, the allegation is of realizing huge amount from different persons in the garb of providing appointment, but such allegations etc. have been done by co-accused Anil Kumar @ Raushan Sharma etc., non-petitioners. The petitioners happen to be father and brother of said Dr. Anil Kumar. It is true that earlier prayer for bail of Raj Kumar Sharma claiming himself to be Managing Director of the company and father-in-law of Anil Kumar has already been refused by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.06.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18598 of 2011, but petitioners are not claiming themselves as Managing Director, etc., rather submission 2 is that they are illiterate and unconcerned with any wrong done. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Complaint Case No. 695C of 2008, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years of till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)