IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4739 of 2009 Nagendra Kumar Jha Son of Surendra Kumar Jha, Resident of Malahi Pakri, P.O.- Kankarbagh, P.S.- Kankarbagh, District- Patna. …..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development, Bihar, Patna. 5. The Deputy Director of Education, Koshi Division, Saharsa 6. The District Magistrate, Saharsa. 7. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Saharsa. 8. The District Superintendent of Education, Saharsa. 9. The District Education Officer, Saharsa. 10. The Block Education Extension Officer-Simri Bakhtiyarpur, Saharsa. 11. The District Magistrate, Arariya. 12. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Arariya. 13. The Additional District Magistrate, Arariya. 14. The District Superintendent of Education, Arariya. 15. The District Education Officer, Arariya. 16. The Block Education Extension Officer-cum-Coordinator, Raniganj, District- Arariya. 17. The Block Education Extension Officer, Farbisganj, District- Arariya. 18. The District Magistrate, Madhepura. 19. The District Development Commissioner, Madhepura. 20. The Additional District Magistrate, Madhepura. 21. The District Superintendent of Education, Madhepura. 22. The District Education Officer, Madhepura. ……Respondents ----------- 2/ 15.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The issue in this case relates to qualification of Baby Teachers Certificate obtained by the petitioner from Gandhi Hindi Vidyapeeth, Prayag, prior to 17.8.1995, when the National Council for Teacher Education came into force. This is the specific case of the petitioner in paragraph 15 of the writ application. The claim has to be considered for appointment on the post - 2 - of Teacher on the basis of aforesaid qualification. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue is covered by a judgment of this court in C.W.J.C. No.1387 of 2007 disposed of on 21.5.2007. Counsel for the State has no objection if the writ application is disposed of in terms of the same. The writ application is allowed and disposed of in terms of the order dated 21.5.2007 passed in C.W.J.C.No.1387 of 2007 and analogous cases. JA/- (Navin Sinha, J.)