1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1139 OF 2010 M/s. High Tech India Construction .... Petitioner.. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..... Respondents. Mr. H.S. Anand i/by Ms. Sarita Dande for the petitioner. Mr. Milind More, AGP., for respondent/State. CORAM : J.N. PATEL, ACTING, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 14TH JUNE, 2010. P.C. Not on Board. Mentioned for circulation. 2. This petition can be disposed of at this stage itself. The petitioner is a developer who has come with a grievance that in spite of the petitioner having obtained a LOI for redevelopment of the subject property, the respondent no. 5 – proposed society, held a meeting and determined the consent 2 given to the petitioner developer by appointing a new developer. In our view, it will be proper that the petitioner approaches the High Power Committee. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the High Power Committee within a period of a week’s time. We make it clear that the development rights of the petitioner as per the LOI obtained by it which stood terminated will be subject to the decision of the High Power Committee. (J.N. PATEL, ACTING, C.J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)