1 cp431.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 431 OF 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 100 OF 2008 [ Sheshrao Namdeo Zimman vs.Ravindra Sajjanrao Nikam & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. A.S. Gandhi, Advocate for petitioner. Mr.N.B. Narwade, Advocate for R.Nos.1 to 8. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 1ST AUGUST, 2011 PER COURT : This contempt petition alleges disobedience of the order passed by the learned Division Bench of this Court on 21-01-2010 in Appeal from Order No.100 of 2008. This Court granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause (C) which reads thus : "Pending hearing and final disposal of this Civil Application and Appeal from 2 cp431.10 order, the defendants, their agents, servants or any one acting on behalf of them may be restrained from interfering and disturbing in to the peaceful possession of plaintiff over the suit land Gut No.65 admeasuring 10 H. 49 R. and the residential house bearing Gram Panchayat House No. 112 situated at village Adgaon (Jehur), Tq. Kannad, Dist. Aurangabad and creating third party interest in the suit premises as mentioned above." 2. It is the contention of Counsel for the petitioner that in spite of interim relief granted in favour of the petitioner, the respondents are trying to interfere with the possession of the petitioner. 3. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that, there is no any interference or obstruction to the possession of the petitioner. The application was filed for modification of the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, however, that 3 cp431.10 application is rejected and thereafter, there is no any such obstruction or interference with the possession of the land in question. Therefore, in my opinion, there is no any contempt as on today. Contempt Petition is disposed of. Notice stands discharged. 4. In case, there is any obstruction in future or any specific instance of obstruction, the petitioner is free to bring it to the notice of this Court. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/AUG11