M THE HIGiH COUP.T OF JUDiCATURE AT B'LASPUR CHHATflSGARH PETITIONER W^NO_/2006 Smt. Lata Sori, Aged about 36 years, W/o. Shri H.R. Sori, R/o. Vii'iage and Post Kutru, Tah. Bijapur, District Dantewada (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1} ^ •••'N/' ..•'" A/y.7 ,.••' h^^L/'" w .21 ^rvy ••"'.-iA^V ^' ^ 3] <ov ^f^^ ^.<^i^' State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Tribal Weifare Deptt., D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Loiiector, uantewaaa, Oistt Dakshin Bastar, Dantewada (CG) Director, Panchayat and Gramin 'v'ikas Vibhag, Chhattisgarh, Rai'pur, District Kaipur (tuj Chier Executive Offlcer, Janpad rancnavat, Bnairamgam, uistnct Dantewada (CG) BlocK fcaucation Utticer, Janpad Panchayat, Bhairamgam, District Uantewaaa (CG) ^ '6} Chief Executive Offlcer, Zita Panchayat, Dantewada, District Dantewada (CG) 4} 31 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Sin^eBeacli: Hon'ble Shrl Satlsh K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. Wo. 1223 OP 2006 Petitioner : Smt. Lata Sori Versus Respondents : State of Cbhattisgarh & Ofhers. Shri Manoj Paranjpe, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sunil Otward, panel lawyer for the respondents. ORAL ORDBR (25th March, 2006) 1. This petition challenges the impugned order dated 30.11.2005, (Annexure P-9), passed by fhe respondent No.5, whereby fhe OfEcer Incharge of Primary School Addaddawalt, Block Bhairamgarh, Distarict Dantewada, has been directed that the order dated 20.10.2005, (Annexure P-5), passed by the Janpad Panchayat, Bhairamgarh, appointing Shiksha Kanai, Grade-III, be not given eflTect to without permission of District CoUector, Daatewada. 2. Learaed coiuisel for the pctitioner submits that the petitioner was dufy selected and appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, vide order dated 30.10.2005 (Annexure P- 5), passed by the respondent No.6. Thereafter, fhe petitioner subinitted the joining report on 1.12.2005, (Annexure P-8). Leamed counsel has further subuutted fhat fhe petitioaer had joined the duties on 1.12.2005, itself. 3. The petitioner was iuformed that the entire selection process appointmg Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, has been caaceUed. It is further contended that the petitioner has not received aay written in&rmation as yet about canceUation ofthe selection proceedings, or his appointnient. 4. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe respondents No. 1, 2 and 3, submits fhat the petitioner has aever joined pursuaat to his selection and appointment as Shiksha Kanni, Grade-III, as the Annexure P-8 is the application inade by the petitioner to the Chief Executive Of&cer, Jaapad panchayat, Bhairamgarh, for his joining. It was farther subinitted that siace the entire selection proceedings have been quasbed aad new selectiou process has been initiated, the petitioner does not have aay right to the appointinent. 5. Be fhat as it inay, leamed counsel for fhe petitioner subinits that fhe petitioner has niade a representation, (Annexure P- 11) to fhe Secretaiy Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Backward Classes, Welfare Department, Govenunent of Chhattisgarh, therefore, fhe respondents inay be directed to decide the said representation within a stipidated period. 6. Having heard leanued coiuisel for the pardes, in the facts aad circuiastances offhe case, fhe respondents are directed to consider and decide the represenlation (Annexure P-II), ia accordance with law, within a period offhree weeks, fioni the date ofreceipt/production ofcopy ofthis order. 7. In view of foregoillg, this petition stauds disposed of. No order as to costs. Sa&sbK.^Agn&oitri ludge (^^