1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5403 OF 2009 Smt. Sarabai W/o Bhagwat Wagh, Age 55 years, Occu. Agri., R/o Ichapur, Tq. Barhanpur, Dist. Purvanimad, Madhya Pradesh. ....Petitioner. Versus Asaram S/o Pavhana Wagh, Age 54 years, Occu. Nil, R/o Karki, Tq. Muktainagar, Dist. Jalgaon. ....Respondent. Shri. P.S. Agrawal, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri. V.P. Patil , Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 16th June 2010. ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. By an order dated 24/08/2000, the Sub Divisional Officer, Bhusawal has made revenue entry No. 1703 in the name of present petitioner in respect of land Gut No. 312 and 313 situated at Village Karki, Tq. Muktainagar. This was the subject matter of challenge in appeal under Section 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code at the instance of sole respondent. The learned Additional Collector, by his 2 order dated 30/07/2001 cancelled revenue entry No. 1307 in the name of present petitioner. The petitioner therefore, carried further appeal before the Additional Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nashik. The same was also dismissed by an order dated 29/11/2008. Thus, the orders passed by the Additional Collector and the Additional Commissioner are the subject matter of this Writ Petition. 2. The notice was issued in this matter on 26/08/2009, in response to which Shri Patil appears for sole respondent. The learned counsel agrees to decide the petiton finally at the stage of admission. Hence, Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with the consent of parties. 3. The learned counsel for the parties inform that Regular Civil Suit No. 24 of 1998 has been filed by the respondent in the Civil Court at Muktainagar for declaration of ownership and injunction. It is further stated that temporary injunction has already been passed in favour of the respondent restraining the present petitioner from disturbing the peaceful possession. Thus, the issue of ownership and possession of the property, is subjdice in the said Regular Civil Suit. 4. It cannot be disputed that the revenue entries do not confer title upon the parties in respect of the properties. Hence, orders passed by the Additional Collector and Additional Commissioner which are 3 impugned orders in the instant writ petition, shall be subject to the decision of Regular Civil Suit No. 24 /1998. If the plaintiff ultimately succeeds in Regular Civil Suit No. 24/98, the entries may remain and if the Regular Civil Suit No. 24/98 fails the entries will be deleted. 5. In the aforesaid premise, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However there shall be no order as to costs. [ R.K. DESHPANDE, J. ] SDM* 5403.09 WP(J)