IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41885 of 2008 1. ANJUM SON OF YAR MOHAMMAD, 2. SADDAM SON OF SHAMMI KHAN, 3. SONU SON OF PHAKO KHAN. ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MAUNA, P.S. NASRIGANJ, DISTRICT-ROHTAS, (SASARAM). - PETITIONERS Versus The STATE OF BIHAR - Opp. Party 2 15.10.2008 The allegations in the first information report are such that the offences alleged to have been committed are bailable, except one to have been committed under Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The allegations pertaining to commitment of offence under the said Act, as appears from the first information report, may or may not constitute an offence under the said Act. In the circumstances, a case for grant of anticipatory bail has been made out. In the event of arrest or surrender of the petitioners within six weeks from today, they are directed to be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional 2 Judicial Magistrate, Bikaramganj (District-Rohtas), in Nasriganj P.S. Case no. 93 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Barin Ghosh, J.) AAhmad