, 1‘ _ ‘ I 1 1 I IGH COURT OF'JUDICATURE AT'BILASPURK C.G. ) IN 1. HE H / LW ® / 2004. ‘6‘M.AV. NO. fgéy @ §PPELLANTS :1. VIRENDRA'KUIVJAR S/o\ / ‘ 1a£e Chinta Ram, Agea about 26 years. 2 I Ramesh‘ Kumar S/o late- \ Chinta Ram , kged about- 24 years 4 ..... ......... 3. Dwarika 3/0 late Chinta- Ram, Aged about 22 years. .7..... ...... ...... QZL£E§ 4. Yogesh Kumar‘ S/o late— Chinta Ram , Aged about—- ..... , 20 years. Ku.Devki Bai D/a late— Chinta Ram, Aged about- ' i 18 years. All resident of village Rate§ara,.Tahsil Charama; § . .Dist.‘Kanker (C.G.)‘. } V E R Ez‘ U S. x j a a W i RE$PONDEETS 1.. s.SANYAS: RAG, S/o 1 ‘ a / 3.3hkachalam, Aged abe'utr .3 : 1 i 44 years, R/o Vijaya— g a i ‘ i gagram, as. Vidhyadp‘ar’.' - § 1 é " Dist.wKrishna'(A.P.) i € nagram, .2. . Vfegkatesrzmar‘ Rae; 3/0 ‘ i ; 1' ‘a Kosaiya, Aged about ‘- ‘ 36 years, R/o Vidhyadhar- ‘ 1 : 3 ; i Duran}, Dist.Krishna (A‘PJ , ~r~ x 5 E j, j Contd.l2/.. /’U <f§ The New India ‘Ensura'nceCempany Limited, Regional, Office, Regi— onal Manager, Bower House Bhilai, Dist. .Durg ( C.G. 5. Issuing Office The New India— Insurance Building 87/Mahatma- ‘ ! andhi Marg Mumbai. . , ‘} Krishna Kumar Soni S/c’Ram - 'Pra sad Soni. Ram Prasad Soni S/o Not known. Ansuiya‘ Bai W/o Ram Prasad Sani. Vijayalaxmi, D/o Ram Prasad Soni. RajLaxmi D/o’Ram Pzasad Soni. Jabd‘ish 3/0 Ram Prasad Soni. Raj rani D/o Ram Prasad Soni. Krishna Kumar D/o Ram Prasad _ Soni. Non—applicant No. I and g Min hrough Father, Ram Prasad— L Soni.‘ ll resident of Aamapara Kanker (C.G.) . The Oriental Ipsurance Co. Regional Manager; Regional Office, Malviya; Nagar, Durg Dist Dirg' ‘(C.G.)o ‘ issued office Dhamtari ( C.G. )' \ v 1 Awmn UrmER SECTIoN 1‘7/3 OP THE MOTOR VEHICLE ‘Ac'r 1988. -— Ki M av Wrw awn/WW 60W § wpm/ Lela 4A 9 4m m7 w nIIIIaLI i L \ Being aggrieved by the Award/Judgement ; and decree dated 22 9 O4 nassed by Additional Motor Accudent» iClaims Tribunal Balod Shri P N Tembhnrkar, 1n Claims Case »No. 6 /2001, Virendra Kumar and 4 others Versus S Sanyasi— Rao and 4 others in which less comensation has been o Icontd.3/.‘... w? G g? 3t A XI—HC—22 T ~ mam WW kmw WW§WW $m%mn%¥r u Raju O2 I 09 i 2006 Appellant No.1 with a Shri LOK ADALAT hd others by Shri DR‘ Gajendra, Advocate. Divisional Manager, New India with Shri NK Agrawal, Sr‘ Advocate with 1sation already awarded by the Tribunal, 1all pay Rs.41,000/- lants. l deposit in FDR, the direction and ratio Ll, if any, shallfollow. ¢ ept in deposit with Bank shall be payable aunal in accordance with iaw. titled to receive interest on the amount so (Rupees forty—one )peal against rest of the respondents stands l be given to the parties free oi costl K.L. Daswani, Insurance Company Limited Shri Kamrool Aziz, Advocate, counsel for respondent No. 3. V‘ In terms of com} )romise, award is passed as beiow2— 1 In addition to compel respondent Na 3 s thousand ) to the appei 2 F‘Or disbursement an: adopted by the Tribune 3 The amount, if any, k under the orders of Tri 4 Appellants shali be en deposited. In View of the above, a] ()1 dismissed 6 Copy of the award shal ,gA Sd/- V.K. Shrivastava Judge Bilaspur - Sdl- Member — Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur (tile W) None for rest of i he respondents.