1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO 224 OF 2011. IN WRIT PETITION NO.1909 OF 2011 Vijay Durgadas Teland and Others .Vrs. M/s Spentex Industries limited,thr.its Vice President.Butibori,Nagpur. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D.KODE, J J. DATED : 20.06.2011 Heard Mr. P.D. Meghe, learned Counsel for appellants and Mr. R.B. Puranik, learned Counsel for respondents. It is apparent that, if Clause 8 and Clause 26 of the Agreement in force, are interpreted by this Court at this stage, as read out by the learned Counsel for respective parties, the challenge in ULP complaint itself is rendered infructuous. In ULP complaint challenge is to stoppage of medical benefits and 2 learned Member of Industrial Court, Nagpur has rejected the interim relief and it has been maintained by the learned Single Judge of this Court. As we do not notice any jurisdictional error, we are not inclined to interfere in this order. It is clarified that observations made by the Learned Single Judge of this Court are only for the purposes of considering the controversy prima facie and the learned Member of Industrial Court, Nagpur shall not be influenced by the same while deciding ULP complaint finally. However, the learned Member of Industrial Court, Nagpur is directed to decide ULP complaint pending before it as early as possible and in any case by 30.12.2011. If any, medical allowance has been paid by respondent /employer to appellants, no recovery on that count shall be effected till the ULP complaint is decided by Industrial court, Nagpur. With these directions and observations Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE scd//