^ :.J liiii; h & Sff Ui^(CH IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH ATBILASPUR M.C.G.NO 39) /2007 APPLICANT:- Sntosh kumar yaday ^. ..^,,ni, y-y-''^^- ~ •'"' *" S/o Mahru Ram Yadav AgedAbout 27Years R/o Lakhenagar Dhal wW- Tudraparj.va Travels Q/1^;D^"^,;c^"^. LakhenagarChowk, '*7- . : Tt—I— —J1O—T^.* ^.J—^i—:^.Tt — -• ^^^ ^:"" RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1) 2.) Vff3<'^ Kuhvy s'ltu1 '^a^ t^^^ ,»b»A 'r7"^ . .T^, t^;»^',* C^(^^ ^.\Ai^ •"•"•-- TahsU SE Oistrict Raipur(C.G.) (OWNER OF THE VEHICLE) Smt. Vasugi Sahu W/o Late Loknath Sahu Aged about 38 years, R/o Shivnagetr, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) Krishna Kuniar Kadra S/o. Bishakhu Ram Kadra Aged About 27 Years' G/o. Through : Sntosh Kumar Yadav S/o MahruRam Yaday , Lakhenagar I>hal,Ruddrapria- Travels,Lakhenagar Chowk, Tate§5DisstRaipur(CG} (Driver OfThe Vehicle) The pnential Insz.u-ance Company Through : Divisional Manager Divisional Office,Kachhari Ghawk, Madina BuUding, Jail Road, Tah/ 8s Disstt Rfliptir 1{C.©.):::;':,. ., ; :,/,^ (InsiiTerOfTheVehicIe) ilii 8^^^^^,^fe^^;^MfsiSS^^feisS,;^4!ife^^^^-*S^^^^i^ APPLICATION FORIffiSTORATIONOPTHE MISCELLANEOUS APPEALtCLAIMl ^Tl SAff E-22 an^l^ &-<i!ti 311^1 g^iwglCT ,t=<- <.7^ 'SSt •<<|<<|<1<|, STil^t'ie. (SiCTi'My STT^T 'qsra? fo.^5b,1^.^7 *IWWI tbll^ 'HT. 200 jlq^sT ail^WWllwgfel i.10.2007 Mr. Vivek Rathors, Advoca^e for the applieant. Hewd on I.A. No.l, an op|)lication •far condonation of delay in filing thepetitfori for restbr'ation of wjtha delqy of 46 dcy; 1 Reawns assigned foc filir the iilnessof the appeliant. ; ;or the reasons indicated the deldyris eondoned. Afeo heard on M.C.C. No order that if the appellant does amount,as per Section 173ofth( of one week, the qppeal shal! be appel!cmt in filing the receipt irj dismlssed fcr non-compiianfce of| 3.7.2007'. Since the appelfant hos amount. the M.C.C. is a!lowedan4i origina! number subject to appelf High Court Legal Aid Committej receipt of the same in the mattejr ^I^^ITT *ii*i<yff ^ ^St Tf^T^R ^siPdiT.sit^r Vfv.A: [c] No.757/07, as the same has been fa this restor'ation with de!cy is in the dppiication. the same is allo»edand 391/07, an (tpplicationfor' pestoration of A.A. [c] NoJST/OT. • This Court vide order d^ted 20.6.2007 had pasgec) a preemptory wt fi!e the deposit receipt of the owarded s Motor Vehictes Act, 1988, within a period lismissed and accordingly on default of the ^tipulated period, ,the appeal was treated the preemptory ordet' dated 20.6.2W7 on now deposited the receip^. of the awar'd .-^ss-"' the miscellaneous appeaTJsrestor'ed to its anfs depositing a sum of Rs.MO/- with the within a period of 15 ciays uid files the Sd/- Bhirendra Mishra Judge 1