IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.10936 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 14, 2010. Smt.Parveen Kumari .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Dinesh Nagar, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the Memo dated 6.1.2010 (Annexure P-29), whereby the Block Primary Education Officer, Pathankot-2 has requested the District Education Officer (E.E.), Gurdaspur to accord approval for appointment of respondent No.5 as Secretary of PUSWAC Committee in place of the petitioner. No final order appears to have been passed so far on these recommendations by the District Education Officer (E.E.), Gurdaspur. In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a self-explanatory representation to the District Education Officer (E.E.), Gurdaspur, who in turn shall consider and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order, preferably within a C.W.P.No .10936 of 2010 2 period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Dasti. July 14, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE