WP/575/2011 : 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.575 OF 2011 Shri Sharad Bhau Channe ... Petitioner V/s. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation & anr. ... Respondents Ms.Seema Chopda a/w T.R. Yadav for Petitioner Mr.G.S. Hegde for Respondents CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE: JANUARY 31, 2011 P.C.: 1. The Petitioner was chargesheeted for certain acts of misconduct. An enquiry was held against him. The Enquiry Officer submitted his report. Thereafter, a notice was issued to the petitioner directing him to show cause as to why punitive action should not be taken against him pursuant to the enquiry report. Without answering that show-cause notice, the petitioner rushed to the Labour Court by filing Complaint (ULP) No.144 of 2010. The interim relief sought by the petitioner for continuing him in service has been rejected by the Labour Court. This order was confirmed by the Industrial Court. 2. In my opinion, there is no need to interfere with the impugned orders. The Writ Petition is therefore rejected. However, till the petitioner answers the show-cause notice, the respondent Corporation will not terminate the services. The show-cause notice shall be answered within two weeks.