THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKER PER THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED WRIT PETITION No.10352 OF 2011 DT.21.06.2011 Between: M/s.Narayana Mining Company, A partnership firm, rep.by its Managing Partner A.Vengaiah S/o.late Sundaraiah, R/o.,Veeranna Kanupuru village and Post, Venkatachalam Mandal, Nellore District and another ……..Petitioners Vs. Debts Recovery Tribunal, at Isnar Khazana Towers, 3rd floor, 2nd lane, Dwaraka Nagar, Visakhapatnam, rep.by its Recovery Officer And three others ……..Respondents. O R D E R: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) Heard Sri A. Venkateswarlu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Deepak Bhattacharjee, Learned counsel appearing for the respondents. At their request, the writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the stage of admission. 2. Earlier, petitioner moved to this Court by filing writ petition No.3431 of 2008 and while deciding the said writ petition, this Court passed the following order: “It is open to the respondents to execute the decree passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam in O.A.No.323 of 2002 for the purpose of liquidating the liability of the writ petitioner. It is needless to observe that the amounts deposited by the petitioner, such as Rs.1.00 lakh, a reference of which is made to in the communication dated 11th January 2008 and Rs.6.00 lakhs, which is said to have been deposited on 29th March 2008, in pursuance of the interlocutory order passed by this Court in this writ petition, shall be given credit to, while liquidating the liability of the petitioner. With this, the writ petition stands disposed, but however, without costs.” 3. Again, the petitioner moved to this Court with the present writ petition seeking a writ of Mandamus challenging the order of proclamation of sale dated 30.03.2011 issued by the first respondent as well as possession notice dated 05.09.2009 issued by the 4th respondent. 4. It is to be noticed that the impugned proceedings were initiated pursuant to the judgment rendered by this Court in Writ Petition No.3431 of 2008. In that view of the matter, the impugned proceedings of proclamation of sale were issued only in accordance with law and there are no merits in the present writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED,J., ________________ K.G.SHANKER, J. Dt.21.06.2011 Rns