1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of | coram, appearance, court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders | CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9634/2005 Shri S.V.Chandole,Adv.for applicant Shri B.R.Jaybhay,Adv.for R 1&2. Shri B.N.Patil,Adv.for R.4 .... CORAM : R.K.DESHPANDE,J. DATE : 4TH AUGUST, 2009. 1] This is an application for grant of injunction restraining the respondents from obstructing and interfering with the possession of the applicant over the suit plot admeasuring 30X134 out of Survey No.103 (Block No.510). 2] The Second Appeal has been filed by the original plaintiffs whose suit for injunction has been dismissed by the trial Court and the said judgment has also been confirmed in appeal. This Court has admitted the Second Appeal on the substantial question of law as to whether the appellant plaintiff is entitled to decree for perpetual 2 injunction on the ground that he was put in possession of the property on the basis of the unregistered sale deed and whether such person is entitled to protection under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act. 3] I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 4 contends that the plaintiff is not in possession of the property and there is no question of disturbing the possession of the plaintiff. However, the claim of the plaintiff is that he is in possession of the property since 1980. Be that as it may. Without entering into the question whether the appellant is in possession or the respondents are in possession, parties are directed to maintain status quo prevailing as on this date and it shall continue to operate pending decision of the appeal. In view of this, Civil Application stands disposed of. (R.K.DESHPANDE, J.) umg/ca9634-05