IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5218 of 2010 Guddu Sao @ Guddu Keshri @ Om Prakash Keshri, S/o Mahendra Sao, resident of Village- Jaigir, P.S. Barachatti, District-Gaya…………………………………..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ……………………….Opposite Party. ----------- 3. 15. 03. 2010. Heard the parties. The petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under Sections 384 and 379 besides some other allied Sections of Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as a matter of fact, other accused persons have committed the offences in question. The only allegation against the petitioner and other F.I.R. named accused persons is that they had called some extremists. The petitioner is said to be in judicial custody since 19. 09. 2009. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that some other accused persons with almost similar and identical allegation that of the petitioner have been granted bail by different Benches of this Court. Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that petitioner is accused in some other criminal cases also. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner namely, Guddu Sao @ Guddu Keshri @ Om Prakash Keshri is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2 S.D.J.M., Sherghati, District-Gaya, in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 204/08, subject to conditions (a) that one of the bailors must be Govt. Servant or close family member of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner, (b) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the information/prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned and (c) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. m.p. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)