IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 18 OF 2007 SMT. QUEENY L. FERNANDES ....Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS ....Respondents SECRETARY TOURISM AND 6 ORS Mr. V. P. Thaly, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. M. Salkar, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4. Mr. U. Tari, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.5, 6 and 7. Coram:- S.K. SHAH & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 6th February, 2007 P.C.:- The learned Additional Government Advocate representing respondent nos.1 to 4 states that the respondent no.2 has verified that the shack in question is illegally put there and the authority i.e. respondent no.4 would demolish the same within a period of three weeks from today. The learned Counsel for the respondent nos.5, 6 and 7 states that the shack does not belong to either respondent nos.5, 6 and 7. As such, nothing survives in this petition. The petition stands disposed of. S.K. SHAH, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.