1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 870 OF 2011 *** Sudam S/o Balasaheb Kale Versus The State of Maharashtra and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 870 OF 2011 *** Sudam S/o Balasaheb Kale Versus The State of Maharashtra and others *** Mr. S. L. Bhapkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. A. V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. P. P. Kulkar4ni, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. *** 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. In view of the statements made on affidavit dated 22nd February, 2011 filed on behalf of Respondent Nos.2 and 3, learned counsel for the Petitioner does not press the writ petition. The prayers made in the writ petition, in our opinion, stand satisfied. Hence, the petition is disposed of. 3. It is open to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings if the respondents do 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 870 OF 2011 *** Sudam S/o Balasaheb Kale Versus The State of Maharashtra and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. not make payment within reasonable time, as stated in the affidavit. S. B. DESHMUKH, J.] [D. B. BHOSALE, J.] Dated:14/06/2011. ans/870