IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Cr.Misc. NO. M 4413 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : 16.2.2009 Shiv Kumar Gupta and another ......PETITIONER VERSUS State of Haryana and others. ......RESPONDENTS PRESENT: None M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioners being the parents of Arvind, who was married to respondent No.4 Deepika have approached this court for protection of their life and liberty on the ground that respondent No.4 had given threats to the petitioners to get them falsely implicated in the case. The appropriate remedy in such circumstances, is to seek the concession of pre-arrest bail, in any case or complaint filed at the instance of respondent No.4. With liberty to the petitioners to avail the said remedy, this petition is disposed of as pre-mature. However, it is observed that in case the petitioners are to be summoned for any inquiry, the provisions of Section 160 Cr.P.C. would govern the rights of the petitioners. February 16 ,2009 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE