IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( S/) No. ggx Of 2010 R.K. Shukla S/o Shri H.K. Shukla, aged about 47 years, In—charge' Mukhya Nagar Ahikari, Nagar Palika Panchayat, Keshkal , District Bastar (CG). PETITIONER: Versus / RESPONDENTS: 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Urban Administration and Development Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2./The Commissioner, Urban Administration and Development Department, Raipur (CG). f/ 3. Joint Director, Urban Administration and Development, Raipur, (CG). 4. Joint Director, Urban Administration and Development, Regional Office, Bilaspur (CG) Collector, Bastar at Jagdalpur (CG). 6. The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat , Keshkal, District Bastar (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ,1. PARTICULARSOF THE PETITIONER: As stated in the cause title above. mWW‘H/lm [5N (o f6) my mam (W) maii’am WM§wm §aifawm B : Hon’ble S ri Manin ta 05-07-2010 Shri Awadh Tripathi, counsel f r the petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the Statelrapondents No‘1 to 5 on advance copy. With the consent of learnad nsei for the parties, the matter is heard frnaHy. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he was sent on deputation from the office of the nt Director, Urban Development & Administration. Regionai Office, Bil spur to work as ln-charge Chief Municipai Corporation, Nagar Pancha at, Takhatpur, vide order dated 22- 08-2008 (Annexure P-9). Thereafter, he petitioner was being transferred from one post to other in the variou Nagar Panchayat. Vide impugned order dated 16-06-2010 (Annexure -1), the petitioner has now been repatriated to his parent department. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the Governm nt Circular dated 02-1 2-1 988, even though, period of deputation was n prescribed in order of deputation dated 22:08-2008 (Annexure P-9), e is entitled to be continued on deputation for a minimum period of tw years and before that he could not be repatriated. Learned counsel for th petitioner relies upon the decision of this Court in the case of Radhe La! Nag Versus State Govt. of Chhatfisgarh and Others (W.P.(S) .3997 of 2007) decided on 27-03- an Wedd—in gwna‘agmafimia Fsr147_‘2/2mo—1,oo,ooo. x m S M u J i 7A0 w 9y mum) ..1.gawzm 3mm (W)