skc 1 WP-8814-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8814 OF 2010 Kailash Daulat Dhakrao ..Petitioner versus Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. P. M. Pradhan with Mr. Manoj Patil for Petitioner. Mr. Ashish Kamath with Mr. Sunil Gangan i/b. M/s. RMG Law Associates for Respondent No.2. Mr. Dilip Bodake with R. F. Totla for Respondent No. 4. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 28, 2011 P.C. : According to the petitioner the respondent no. 4 ought not to have been granted LPG Dealership since he is not a resident of Wadalibhoi but is a resident of Chandwad in Nashik District. The requirement that an allottee should be a resident of Wadalibhoi where RGGLV is located is not disputed. Since this matter involves a disputed question of fact, we are not inclined to entertain the petition, we consider it appropriate to direct the Tahsildar Wadalibhoi to decide whether the respondent no.4 is a resident of Wadalibhoi or not. The Tahsildar shall after taking into account all the skc 2 WP-8814-10 documents produced by all the parties and hearing them to decide the above question within a period of four weeks from today. Till then, Mr. Kamath on behalf of the respondent no.2 states that the respondent no. 2 will not allot the dealership to any party. If the order is adverse to the petitioner the respondent no. 2 will not allot the dealership to any party for a period of two weeks thereafter. Order accordingly. (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)