IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CAN/162 / 2006 In CP /175/2006 SHRI KRISHNARAO SHIVRAM YADAV ... Petitioner vs. SHAMARAO DNAYANU SHEWALE.. Respondents Mr. P. J. Pawar for petitioner CORAM: D. G. KARNIK J. DATE: 13th November, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner . 2. This civil application is made for restoration of the contempt petition which was dismissed for non appearance. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that notice of the contempt petition was not issued to the respondent and prays for dispensation of the notice of this civil application. In view of the fact that the notice for hearing on admission of the contempt petition was not issued, issuance of the notice of this civil application is dispensed with. 3. From the averments in the petition it appears that the name of the advocate is wrongly shown in the cause list and hence he could not remain present. For the reasons stated in the civil application the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c ). (D.G. KARNIK J.)