IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. No. 207 of 2010. Decided on: 24th September, 2010. Netar Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): In sequel to order dated 23rd August, 2010, Mr. P.M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record a copy of communication dated 23.8.2010, received from the office of Secretary (Agriculture), Government of Himachal Pradesh. The text of the letter reads thus: “Apropos telephonic discussion with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General with the undersigned, it is informed that Shri Netar Singh, ADO, who is under orders of transfer from the office of SDSCO, Mandi to S.C. Section, Pangi (Temporarily adjusted at Sunder Nagar at present) can be adjusted at Development Block, Chopal against vacant post.” 2. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to adjust the petitioner at Development Block, Chopal against vacant post. However, it is made clear that after the petitioner completes the period of two 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. years, he will be given the station of his choice. The Court appreciates the fair stand adopted by the respondent-State. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge August 24, 2010. (bhupender)