bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1977 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 1977 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 1977 OF 2008 Mrs.Rashmi Sanjay Jain ... Petitioner v/s 1. Swapnil Ramesh Gaikwad 2. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondents Mr.Vinod Wagh i/by H.S.Venegavkar for the petitioner. Mr.I.M.Khairdi for the respondent No.1. Smt.P.P.Shinde, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.V. POTDAR, J. A.V. POTDAR, J. A.V. POTDAR, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 13TH FEBRUARY, 2009 13TH FEBRUARY, 2009 13TH FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. Relying on the judgment reported in 2006 (2) B.C.R. (Cri.) 830, it is urged by the advocate for the petitioner that without application of mind process is issued by the Trial Magistrate. What is urged before me is that, it is the offence of the petitioner against whom the process is issued. The Trial Magistrate to consider the averments in the complaint whether it discloses the offence for which the process is issued. I did not find any fault with the order passed by the Magistrate. No merits in the petition. Hence the petition stands dismissed.