In the High Court of Uttaranchal, at Nainital. Writ Petition No. 896/2004 (M/S) Rajendra Singh Petitioner. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation/ Addl. Collector, Haridwar And others. ...Respondents. Dated:- 23-9-2004 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon J. Heard Sri Rajendra Singh learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Lokpal Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. Against the order passed by the appellate court remanding the matter to the Consolidation Officer, a revision was preferred. The revisional court on 10-8-2004 has passed the order dismissing the revision and maintaining the order passed by the appellate court remanding the case to the Consolidation Officer. In view of the fact that the matter has been remanded to the Consolidation Officer for hearing, I do not find any infirmity in the order. Let the Consolidation Officer decide the matter in accordance with law. The revisional court has already directed for maintaining the status quo till the Consolidation Officer decides the matter. In view of the above, parties are directed to maintain the status quo. The Consolidation Officer is directed to decide the writ petition expeditiously after hearing both the parties. Subject to the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of finally. ( Rajesh Tandon, J.) ISB