IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26321 of 2011 Arbind Rai, son of Sri Surendra Rai Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 4. 20.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that initially the case was instituted under Section 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code but later on, considering the fact that allegation of demand of dowry was not credible, charge sheet was submitted under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. During investigation, some witnesses stated that they had seen the deceased hanging from the roof suggesting suicide. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 413 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor 2 will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)