IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2174 of 2009 DRAUPADI DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The deceased of the case is second wife of petitioner’s husband. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that similarly situated Madan Sah has been allowed bail by a Bench of this Court but it appears from the computer chart that petitioner’s husband has been refused bail. The F.I.R. is clear enough that if there was any grudge that was not with Madan Sah rather with petitioner and her husband. The death is in matrimonial house. The reason behind the killing is shown the demand of a cycle and son of the deceased. Thus I find the case of the petitioner is similar to that of her husband who has been refused bail by a Bench of this Court. The prayer for bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI