c^^^ /<^/— IN THE HON»BLBHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PBTITION (Sl No.3J) )^/2011 PETITIONER <^.^^ J^^p1"" ^^y" ^^""'" Smt. Anju Prabhakar W/o Shri Umesh Chand Prabhakar aged about 44^Years, Upper Division Teacher, presently working at govt. Girls Middle School Katghora, Block- Katghora, District Korba (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Deportment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. Commissioner, TribalWelfare Deportment, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Korba District Korba (C.G.) 4. Joint Director, Treasury,accounts, pension, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA - 30. ashok PET(T!ONER RESPONDENrS HIGHOQURrO&0HHATTtSGARH: BIASPUR J^^ : :-.;.4"',..'. . .Smt. Aryu 13rabhakar Vereus H State ofChhattisgarh & Others <Writ RetWlon under Arttcte 226of the Constttution of indjs| Siingle Bench : Hon'bleShri Satith K.^iih<Ari,J, fsrese^^-, ^hnA^ ShrhN.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer forthe Stsrte. I ORpg^fflftAiJ . :'.,.' .: .1'"1' ':::" .i.;..'"" l:-'"B:';:"y1 " (Passed on thte 01st d^ ofJufy,%)11) t. < Nearcl leamed counsellorthe psuties. ; i 2< Leamed counsel appearing for th®(?etitionw submite ttot the petHioner ? ; is entitted to berwfit crf two advance jncrementeon accour^ of^having " pa^ed B.Ed. examination i^ on (%.04.1994, al her own cost. It is submitted that fie issue inwlved in f th^ pro!§®ntjpetiti^n is no longer /®s^rt^ra, asthe same has beerefinally clecicted bytheSupFjBmeCQyrtlri^p SfixefMv,^aiff<^My.^ Qrs^. 3. tt Ss further submitted that this Court has ateo taken si similar vi«win its order dated 6-2-2009 passedln W.P. (8) No.6257 of 2008. Leamed counsel further submits that the order dated 29-4-2010 passed in W.A.No.124of 2009, wherein relying upon thejudgmentpftheSupreme Court in Asha Saxe^ (supra) arwt e^o^ r another W.A.No.87 ^ 2009, dir^o^^ ^ tssued for consideration oflhe case for grantof Nw advwice increments as per the Gircuiarclatod 21^-1974 issuedbytheStateofMad^^^ verificatton of the facte pleactect in Ihe petttion. 4. Leamed counsel appeanng for the ®atesubmits ttiat the <»isa(rf the pettNoper wpuld alsp be considered on tt»same lines; 5. In view of the aboy®,thej)e^c)n is <lis|?osel ofw a<lirec|@r»totlse respoi^ent^ authorities tp deci^ claim of the peBtionw for gr^rt of Iwo advance increments, asper the circularcteted 21-9-1074, itsined by the State of Madhya Pradeshafteryerificationofthefat^plesKl^ln the petitjpn wittiin a period ofSweeksfromtoday. —- Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge 12009(ltl)MPJR(SC)S9