B'rr"""" XI-HC—78 3^T "4|^|«.<|, yiTfl'M'KS, (sKriKHy /n . A fc^i 2.^2- HWW sbill* ••••••-••••••—•••••••••••"••••--•••••••••--•^ 200 S sn^t wre (ijc(^«i<yT) an> sn^rw ft;-fii<] i 'cPtT 3:fT^?T shHicn TOiRR^ifersn^i COURT OF r< A •ie Eeach ,s.^ a^V^i^^ lioa ble Slii'i Dhireadra Mishra, J •^..TSTS^^. (insurer) Clannaat Owner of vehicle Driver of vehicle 2. 4. fT'he Ori.ental Iiisurance Com.paay Luiuted, tlirough tlie Divisional |Manager, Division OiSce, Maiii [Road, Jagdalpiir (C.G.) CMAl[<;l4ll 'RR^ff '^,tiT^ <Rfl^K ^siRiH sii^i lr>!. ;f iSeS' IKrisjiao. Kiim.ar, Banjai-a S/o Dhaii Singb, [aged about 31 years |Suit. Shaiiti Baajara fagect about vears, (Both respondents Resiuent of Bus Istaad Bhairaigarh, P.S. Bhairaiiigarh, Dist. Daiiteviada |(C.G.)} IShri Maaoj Kuiaar, Kashvap S./o MaL.endra Nafh IKashyap Village-Heeraaai', Gidam., 'Dist. Dantewada (C.G,) Shri Ghasuram Maiizhi ;/o Shri Ludu Maiizhi, ' ^; . aged about 38 yeai's, resideilt of Sailjay Para, Bhairaingarh, Dist. Daiitewada (C.G.) !f»^ ~ss^ •^ww<i, (j>Tfl'yi|(i, Ri<?>i<-iy '2 ^ /^l. ;q- C O 2-^2. ^Wv\l sb*11* —-•-•-----—••••-•---••••• ^ 200<a an^yr tia% (ipf^p^i) an^i.Tr Ri-ii'b Wn31R^I'*1 -¥A~U^J- -. ^<]1WBfTO 3{I^I Mr. Ghanshvam f None for the re;sptiticlents. Heai-d on M.C.P.No.l71'.| of delay iii nlillg this appeal a: delay of 136 days as per ofiice Reasons assigiied for f51i|3.; file was sent for accordiag peri)i1 aiid after obtainm.g perm.issic|n Office, Raipur aad th.ereafter il Bilaspiu- on 29.11.2005. Ho'.l thereafter as the certified cl uiaiidatoiy receipt were iD.issu^ copy ofthe unpugued award, t} Froni perusal of the app! evident tiiat there was recklesl ofScers of tlie appellant ia pur; appeal ia time and fhe groirad; canuoT be considered to be b<t the delay. Accordiagly, the a^ rejectecl, Consequentiy, the app4 iiQita.tiQii. chl^^1T1 +11*1<?ff ^f fs^ <r»i'^.f1i ^aiRnaii^i iatel, couxisel for the appellailt. ^/2006, applicanon for condouation the saiu.e has been prefen-ed wifb. a. hote dated 12.4.2006. lujlg this appeal belatedly ai-e that the ritiission to tlie Regional Office, Indore i, it was received by fh.e Division was received b'y ti.ie Divisiou Offce, 7ever, the appeal could not be filed :|3py of fhe unpugned award arid (g aad oilly after tracilig the ceili&ed |ie uistaat appeal has been filed. icatioii for condoiiation of delay, it is ^ness ag^ negligen.ee on the part. of .uuag the inatter for filuig tiie iiistant inentioned m. flie above apptication b<j>naiide and sufiicient for condonin.! Iplication for condoiiation of delav is al is also disiaissed as oan'ed bv Sd/- Dhu'endra Mishra Judge GRPRJ — FS/246—2/2007— 50,000.