IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2690 of 2008 1.SHARDA SINHA widow of Late Brajendra Kumar Sinha. 2.Om Prakash Sinha son of Late Brajendra Kumar Sinha. Both resident of Village-Makdumpur Parthu, P.S. Ekangar Sarai, District-Nalanda. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, Son of not known, Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Human Resources development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.Sri Dhananjay Kumar Son of not known, Director, Higher Education, Bihar, Patna. 4.Sri Ashutosh, Son of not known, Director, Primary Education-Cum-Additional Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.Sri I.S.Dhariwal, Son of not known, Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 6.Sri Prabhu Sahu, Son of not known, District Education Officer, Chatra, Jharkhand. 7.Sri R.K.Verma, Son of not known, Accountant General, Jharkhand, Ranchi. 8.The State of Jharkhand. ----------- 4 18/8/2009 Heard counsel for the parties. Counsel for the petitioner with reference to the earlier order dated 28.7.2009 in this case has not filed any rejoinder to the respective show cause filed by the opposite parties contending that the order of this Court has been complied with. He, however, on the basis of the averment made in the show cause of opposite party no.6, would submit that though revised family pension and gratuity were already sanctioned in the name of petitioner no.1, its payment was to be made from the District Treasury, Nalanda, but it is not clear as to whether such payment has been made or not. This matter being one related to contempt it was for the petitioner to contend and demonstrate that any part of the order 2 of this Court had not been complied. That having been not done, this Court will not keep the matter pending specially when there is no deliberate, muchless, wilful disobedience of order of this Court. However if the petitioner the widow of the employee would find that payment in terms of the revised gratuity and revised family pension as sanctioned by the Accountant General, Jharkhand has not been made by the District Treasury of Nalanda, she would be at liberty to approach the concerned Treasury Officer, who must act in accordance with the sanction order of the Accountant General. With the aforementioned observation/direction this application is disposed of. Abhay Kumar (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)