1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 5188 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | Adv. Shri A.R. Borulkar for the petitioner. Mr. V.B. Ghatge, AGP for the State. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & K. K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 6 th AUGUST, 2010. 1 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It is stated that the accounts maintained by the trust were not made available. After noticing deficiencies, the impugned order was passed. 2 In exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, we would not interfere in the matter. The petitioner is entitled to file comprehensive 2 representation which would be gone into and decision be taken. Learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on the judgment in the matter of Renuka Sitaram Dhoke vs. Chief Executive Officer and others reported in 2008(3) Bom.C.R. 392 in support of contention that the principles of natural justice were not followed. 3 In the facts of the case, the petition stands rejected. Petitioner is entitled to file fresh representation to the authority in respect of the prayer made herein. 4 In view of dismissal of the petition, pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( K. K. TATED, J.) ( NARESH H. PATIL, J.) dyb / office / wp5188.09.odt