BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Fourth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15325 of 2011 1 RAJESH KANNA 2 MURUGAN 3 SENTHIL 4 GOMATHI 5 LAKSHMI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO 1 TO 5 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SRIVAIKUNDAM TALUK, TUTICORIN DISTRICT, CRIME NO.16 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. B.JEYAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as A1 to A5 and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 494 and 506(ii) I.P.C., r/w. 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.16 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. Heard Mr.B.Jeyakumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent person and they have not committed any offence and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) would submit in his argument that the investigation is offing. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners No.2 to 5 are the in-laws of the defacto complainant. 5. In so far as the petitioners No.2 to 5 are concerned, considering of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners No.2 to 5. Accordingly, the petitioners No.2 to 5 are directed to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam, Tuticorin District and on further condition that the petitioners No.2 to 5 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners No.2 to 5 shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. As far as the first petitioner is concerned, this petition is dismissed as not presed. 7. The petitioners No.2 to 5 shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. Sd/- 24/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SRIVAIKUNDAM, TUTICORIN DT 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SRIVAIKUNDAM TALUK, TUTICORIN DISTRICT 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. B.JEYAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.41337 ssk/28.11.2011 /5c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15325 of 2011 Date :24/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/