yj (l^lsry SinaSe Beneh THE mOH GOURT QF JUDIGATURE OF CHHATHSGARH ATBILASPUR WritPetitionfS}NO. ^1'^. /2009 PETITIONER r^- c\y,. ^^¥i 17 o:y<^ ;^^ -&'" <*-•" .\ ..••' '. ^fS^' ^' RESPONDENTS Saniu Shrivastava W/o Chandrahas Shrivastava, Afsd about 42 years, R/o Street-3, Nirala Chowk, Kasaridih Ehirg District Durg (C.G.( VERSUS 1i State of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary Ministry of Education D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.} 2J The Coinmissioner, Public Instruction, Raipur (C.G.) 3) The District Education OfGcer, Durg, EHstrict Durg (C.G.) WBITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTI'EU'HON OF INDIA The petitioner niosthumbls_aiLd_j'esnectfi-iUiL 1XCU3W- ^-.^. ^-g^i^4sg ps^s-'W.-S'-3T^ HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WntPetition fS) No. 5176 of 2009 Petitioner Sint Sanju Shrivastava Versus Respondents State of Chhatdsgarh & others (Writ Petition under Article 226 offhe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agaihotri J.) None for the petitioner. Shri P. K. Bbadiui, Paael Lawyer for the respondents. QRDERJwa.Il ( Passed on tius 15th day ofSeptember, 2009) 1. The petitioner has filed aa appUcation (I.A.No.2), seeking permission of fhis Court to withdraw ttus writ petition. The application is supported by an aEGdavit 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State has no objection. 3. Iu view offhe foregoiag the appUcation (I.A.No.2) fe allowed aad as such, the writ petittou is dismissed as withdrawn. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Tliakur