IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 19TH MAGHA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 356 of 2008() ----------------------------- CRA.106/2003 of II ADDL. SESSIONS COURT, TRIVANDRUM CC.594/2000 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, VARKALA .................... REVN. PETITIONER: REVISION PETITIONER ------------------------------------- N.ANGAMUTHU,1480 D-AVANACHI ROAD COIMBATORE, TAMIL NADU. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV SRI.K.V.VINODKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. MUSTHAFA, MUMTAZ MANZIL, VADASSERIKONAM, VARKALA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR,J. ========================= CRL.R.P. NO. 356 OF 2008 ========================= Dated this the 8th day of February 2008 ORDER The accused in C.C.594/2000 on the file of the J.F.C.M. I, Varkala for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No. 1238 of 2008 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE css/ CRL.R.P.356/2008 2 css/