IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.10537 -M of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : APRIL 19, 2010 SURINDER KAUR @ SHALINDER KAUR ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Anant Kataria, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Addl.AG, Haryana. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) This petition under Section 439, Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed for bail in case FIR No.95 dated 22.7.2009 under Section 304-B, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Lalru, District S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali). Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that Pritam Singh, husband of the petitioner, has been allowed bail. It has further been pointed out that the petitioner along with her husband were living in a separate portion of the house and were having a separate kitchen. Keeping in view the fact that Pritam Singh has already been allowed bail and considering the report of the Deputy Superintendent of Criminal Misc. No.10537 -M of 2010 2 Police, and also the fact that the petitioner is a female, the petition is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. April 19, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?