1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4351 OF 2009 Raosaheb Nivrutti Sonawane, R/o- At Post-Kaij, Tq-Kaij, District-Beed. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Water Resources and Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.C.V. Thombre Advocate for Petitioner. Shri.R.P. Phatke, Additional Government Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.U. CHANDWAL, JJ. DATE : 3RD DECEMBER, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. 2 2. The Petitioner has grievance regarding his promotion. According to the counsel for the Petitioner, the Petitioner has filed representation with the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Beed. None appears for Zilla Parishad, Beed. Matter is urgently circulated. 3. We direct the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Beed to pass appropriate orders on the representation made by the Petitioner, on its own merits, within two months from today. If necessary, The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Beed is entitled to hear the Petitioner in person. 4. With these directions Writ Petition is disposed of. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] asb/DEC09/wp4351.09