IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 3RD JULY 2007 / 12TH ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 18365 of 2007(J) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- BPL LIMITED, BPL TOWERS, 13 KASTURBA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001, KARNATAKA. REP. BY: MR.B.OONNY KRISHNA KURUP, ASST.GENERAL MANAGER - ACCOUNTS. BY ADV. SRI.A.M.SHAFFIQUE SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR SRI.ANIL D. NAIR RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, KOZHIKODE - 673 006. BY SRI. THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL – SC PF THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C)NO.18365/07 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPYOF THE NOTICE DATED 29.03.2007 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 16.04.2007 FROM THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 30.04.2007 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 21.05.2007 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT DATED 28.05.2007 FROM THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER SHEET DATED 29.05.2007 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 01.06.2007 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. -------------------------------- W.P.(C)NO.18365 OF 2007 ----------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 3rd DAY OF JULY, 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court challenging Ext.P6 order to the extent it directs the Managing Director of the petitioner Company to appear in person before the 1st respondent in the course of proceedings under Section 7A of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act. Now the learned standing counsel for the respondent submits that subsequently the petitioner has produced records as directed and therefore the personal appearance of the Managing Director is not being insisted upon and 7A proceedings would be completed accordinlgy. A statement is also filed on behalf of the respondent to the above effect. This is recorded and the writ petition is closed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd