CRLMB 880/2010 Raju Saini Vs. State (1) In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan At Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R In S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.880/2010 Raju Saini Vs. State of Rajasthan Date Of Order :: 8th February, 2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.N. Bhandari Mr. A.K. Gupta, for the petitioner. Mr. Laxman Meena, Public Prosecutor. .......... Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that so far petitioner is concerned, he is not manufacturer of ghee, rather oil and ghee were purchased from the manufacturer under different bills and were sent to the retailers. When a complaint was received regarding ghee, the retailers were asked to return the material and in between police seized the material. In the FSL report, it is not stated that as to how adulteration exists in ghee, because only the report given is that sample of ghee is not confirming to the standards. Looking to the peculiar facts of this case and petitioner is behind bars for last near about two months may be released on bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering the rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is CRLMB 880/2010 Raju Saini Vs. State (2) accepted and I consider it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner namely, Raju Saini on bail under section 439 Cr.P.C. in FIR No.208/2009 registered at Police Station-Fatehpur, District Sikar for offence under sections 420, 272, 273 of IPC and section 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act,1954 provided he, furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (M.N. Bhandari),J. VS Shekhawat/- Jr. P.A. D33