IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15451 of 2009 CHANDAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 5.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner never received any cheque for Rs. 10,000/- which allegedly paid to him for supply of bricks. The cheque was bearer cheque, handed over to another. Further submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that loan was borrowed by the informant for his theatre business which resulted into loss and for payment of loan he issued cheque to different persons but never issued to the petitioner otherwise cheque was issued more than one year earlier for supply of bricks even its non-supply, the case was lodged but in course of investigation another story played by the informant. In any case if misappropriation was there on behalf of the informant, the petitioner cannot be involved from any corner as he was not connected to him in any capacity. - 2 - In the discussed suggested facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Banmankhi P.S.Case No.201 of 2007, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI