IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.DENESAN TUESDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2007 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 8235 of 2007(E) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ MAJEED.P.K., HEAD CLERK, COLLEGE OF APPLIED SCIENCE, KOOTHUPARAMBU. BY ADV. SRI.M.A.THOMAS KUTTY SMT.ASHA CHERIAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. 3. THE DIRECTOR, INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN R1 BY ADV.SRI.S.SAJAN R2& R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.K.DENESAN, J ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C)NO. 8235 of 2007 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 13 th day of March, 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner is working as Head Clerk under the third respondent. It is contended that his right to be promoted to the post of Head Clerk arose with effect from 18.11.2003, but the respondents have not considered the above claim of the petitioner in accordance with law. He has filed representations before the respondents including Ext.P9 addressed to the third respondent. 2. Having regard to the fact that all necessary facts and contentions have been elaborately stated in Ext.P9, it is only appropriate that the third respondent looks into Ext.P9 and takes decision as early as possible. 3. I have heard the Counsel for the petitioner and the Counsel for respondents 2 and 3. Government is only a formal party. W.P.(C)No.8235/2007 :2: 4. There shall be a direction to the third respondent to consider Ext.P9 on merits and pass orders, in accordance with law, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. K.K.DENESAN, JUDGE css/ W.P.(C)No.8235/2007 :3: s W.P.(C)No.8235/2007 :4: