IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Contempt Petition No. 358 of 2006 1. Ravi Shankar Divedi, S/o Ramdayal Divedi Bandi Rakshak District Jail New Tehri, District Tehri Garhwal. 2. Jogendra Singh, S/o Jaswant Singh, Bandi Rakshak, District Jail New Tehri, District Tehri Garhwal. 3. Virendra Singh S/o Radheshyam Bandi Rakshak, District New Tehri, District Tehri Garhwal. 4. Suresh Kumar Tureya S/o Bhagwan Das Tureya Bandi Rakshak, District Jail New Tehri, District Tehri Garhwal. 5. Mahesh Chandra S/o Pritam Singh, Bandi Rakshak, District Jail New Tehri, District Tehri Garhwal. 6. Ashesh Kumar Mishra S/o Wishambahar Dayal Mishra Bandi Rakshak, District Jail New Tehri, District Tehri Garhwal. ….Petitioners Vs Bhaskaranand Joshi, I.G. (Prison) State of Uttaranchal 107/1 Race Course Dehradun, District Dehradun. …..Respondent Smt. Pushpa Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioners. Sri Vipul Painuly, learned counsel for the petitioner No.2. Sri K.P. Upadhaya, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the respondent. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard. By means of this contempt petition, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed to summon and punish the respondents for flouting the order dated 21-08-2006 passed by this Court in writ petition No.1132 of 2006 (S/S) Ravi Shankar Divedi Vs. Union of India and others. Counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent. The learned Additional C.S.C. has submitted that the representation of the petitioner has been decided by speaking order contained in annexure No. C.A.-1 to the Counter Affidavit. The learned Additional C.S.C. has submitted that the order has been complied with. The contempt petition is dismissed accordingly. Notice issued against the respondent is hereby discharged. However, the petitioner would be at liberty, if the petitioner has some grievance, he may assail the order by way of filing a fresh writ petition. (B.S. Verma, J.) Dated: - 26th December 2007 M.K.