WP(C) 3298/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that though h e is the tenant in respect of the house in question and there is a dispute relat ing to the ownership of the said house and he filed an application before the re spondent ASEB authority for providing electrical connection, the same has not be en provided till date. On such assertion this Court vide order dated 29.6.2011 had directed the learned standing counsel, ASEB to obtain necessary instruction and on the basis of the verbal instruction, the learned standing counsel has submitted that the electrical connection shall be provided to the premises in question subject to t he fulfillment of the terms and conditions and the regulation notified by the As sam Electrical Regulatory Commission including the conditions stipulated in clau se 3.6.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that all the requir ements would definitely be fulfilled by the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent ASEB authority to pass necessary order relating to the electrical connection to be provided to the premises in question subject to the fulfillmen t of the conditions stipulated for that purpose. It is needless to say that before passing such order the respondent No. 4 shall also be heard. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of one month from the date of submission of the copy of this order before the respondent No. 3, t he Sub Divisional Officer, Dhubri Electrical Division. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.