IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11525 of 2009 SAROJ NUT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 06.05.2009 Heard. Considering the facts of the case and specially the fact that lady informant had picked up the petitioner after identifying him and named in her report which fact was supported by others also, the court is not inclined to re-consider its earlier rejection order. However, contention is that some of the witnesses who have been examined, have named him in their statement before the police as one of the dacoits who was identified by them but during trial they have not supported the story of identification by them of the present petitioner. The court feels that the lady should be examined and as soon as she is examined, the petitioner could have a cause to come up before this court with fresh prayer in case lower court does not grant bail. At any rate, she should be examined within six months from the date of receipt of the present order. It does not mean that the examination of the lady could not be made before hand. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)