CLCON No. 80/2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala J. Mr. Arvind Vashishta, the learned counsel for the applicant. The learned counsel for the applicant alleges non-compliance of the order dated 23rd March, 2010. It is alleged that inspite of an interim order, the committee at the District level is being presided over by the District Magistrate. It has been stated at the Bar that the respondents have filed a counter affidavit alongwith stay vacating application in the writ court, which is pending consideration. In view of the aforesaid, this court finds that the contempt application is premature at this stage. It would not be appropriate to summon the opposite parties at this stage and an opportunity should be given to the respondents to get the stay order vacated. Consequently, the contempt application is dismissed at this stage and it would be open to the applicant to get the interim order confirmed or to get the writ petition decided and thereafter, it would be open to the applicant to file a fresh contempt application, if the cause survives. Dated: 15.6.2010 (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Nishant