IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10916 of 2010 MD.MOHASIN Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 22.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State as also the learned counsel appearing for O.P. no.2 Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with complaint case no. 1027( C )/2009 in which cognizance has been taken under section 498 A of the Indian penal Code. According to the prosecution case petitioner is husband of the complainant and there is allegation of demand of dowry and torture against him. Learned counsel for the petitioner by referring to the orders passed by the learned Sessions Judge submits that all endeavors were made for amicable settlement of entire dispute between the parties. The presence of the complainant was secured by learned Sessions Judge through Public prosecutor. The complainant appeared before the learned Sessions Judge on different dates, but she refused to live with the petitioner as his legally wedded wife with all dignity and honour. The complainant is not prepared to restore her matrimonial relationship with the petitioner. Learned counsel for the complainant as also the State have strongly opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and have submitted that there are allegations of demand of dowry and torture against the petitoner. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court - 2 - below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M, Gopalganj, in connection with the above noted case, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J. ) M.Rahman