1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6419 of 2010 1. MITHILESH PATHAK, son of Indranath Pathak 2. CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA, son of Tejnarayan Jha, Both are resident of Village Murali, P.S. Kishanpur, Distt. Supaul. ----Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.2.2010 Mr. Pramod Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this application in so far as it relates to petitioner no.1 Mithilesh Pathak has become infructuous as he has been arrested during the pendency of this application. The application against petitioner no.1 is, thus, dismissed as infructuous. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner no.2 Chandra Shekhar Jha and the State. The offence alleged against petitioner no.2, who is apprehending his arrest in a police case, is under sections 384,504 and 506/34 of the Penal Code. It is submitted that petitioner no.2 is a Sanskrit Teacher and has been falsely implicated in this case at the instance of the informant, who is a practising Advocate of the Civil Court, Supaul. The present case has been lodged on account of village politics. It is further submitted that the allegations are absolutely concocted. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner no.2 Chandra Shekhar Jha, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case 2 No.104/09 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)