WPSS No.1877 of 2011 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Mr Vikas Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr Anil Bisht, Brief Holder for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In the year 2006 petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher LT Grade (General Studies) and was posted at G.I.C. Kalron, District Almora. On 30.05.2009 an advertisement was issued by the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission for the post of Lecturer Geography. Petitioner applied for the said post and was selected. After her selection she was issued appointment letter dated 01.09.2011 by which she was posted at G.I.C. Jeenapani, District Almora. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the posts of Lecturer are vacant in G.I.C. Narayan Nagar, Kusumkhera, Haldwani and D.I.E.T., Rudrapur. Therefore, she made representation before the respondent no.2 to consider her application for posting in G.I.C. Narayan Nagar, Kusumkhera, Haldwani and D.I.E.T., Rudrapur or at the nearby place. He submitted that she is married to Sh. Faiz Ahmad Khan on 24.10.2011. But nothing has been done by the respondent no.2 so far. This representation is based on the Government Order No.194/XXIV-2/2011-13(33)/2010 dated 10th March, 2011 which provides that for the appointment of lady teacher, preference shall be given for her posting in the same institution. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of this Government Order, the respondents should have considered the representation of the petitioner and should have amended the appointment order and should have posted the petitioner in G.I.C. Narayan Nagar, Kusumkhera, Haldwani, D.I.E.T., Rudrapur or some nearby place. Learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the representation of the petitioner in the light of the Government Order dated 10th March, 2011. Learned Brief Holder for the State also submitted that it will be appropriate, in case such direction is issued to the respondent no.2 and the representation of the petitioner will be decided in accordance with law. In view of the statement of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 29.10.2011, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of the order. Respondent no.2 will also consider the prayer of the petitioner for her posting at nearby place. Interim Relief Application No.13394 of 2011 stands disposed of. (V.K. Bist, J.) 21.12.2011 Arti