..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2981 OF 2008 Heena Ramesh Lulla. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.N.N. Gavankar, Adv. h/f. Mr.Arfan Sait, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the State. Mr.Sanjay A. Ghaisan, Adv. for orig.complainant. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 17th September, 2008. DATED : 17th September, 2008. DATED : 17th September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant, the learned APP for the State and the learned Advocate for the orig.complainant. Complainant - Sharada Patel and the Investigating Officer are present in person. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.I-116 of 2008 of Nalasopara Police Station. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. The applicant is a married lady having a child of nine years old. In the present case, it is seen that the main role has been attributed to ..(2).. co-accused Dinesh. Moreover, the complainant has filed Criminal Writ Petition No.1742 of 2008 before this Court wherein she has stated that her statement has not been properly recorded and she has categorically stated before the police that only co-accused No.1 Dinesh gave stick blows to the deceased. Looking to these facts and the fact that the applicant is a lady and even as per the prosecution case the main role has been played by co-accused Dinesh, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 4. The applicant - Heena Ramesh Lulla to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant shall report to Nalasopara Police Station once in a fortnight, till conclusion of the trial. 5. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)