1 CP 139-09 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.139 OF 2009 Asauddin Nasiruddin Shaikh & anr. .Petitioners V/s. Vallabh Co-operative Housing .Respondents Society Ltd. & ors Mr.V.R.Tripathi, Advocate, for the Petitioners Ms.Lipika Biswas, Advocate, for Respondent No. 2 Ms Asmat Hipparsi h/f.Mr.Clifford Martis, Advocate, for the Respondent Nos.1, 3 & 4 CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 6TH AUGUST, 2010 P.C. . The Contempt Petition is thoroughly misconceived. The Petitioners seek execution of the decree passed by the City Civil Court by order dated 14th January, 2008. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that when he sought execution of the decree, the office told him that the decree could not be executed. It will not be for the office of the City Civil Court to rule on execution. If 2 CP 139-09 the Petitioners file execution proceedings before the Court, the Court would be obliged to pass some order. Since the whole chapter on the execution is annexed in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 because the decrees of Civil Court are voluntarily obeyed by the Judgment debtors, the Petitioners ought to seek to execute the decree before the executing Court as per the provisions in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, rather than rush to this Court complaining of contempt of Court. 2. Contempt Petition is dismissed. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)