^p- APPELLANT8/: (Plaintiffs) HIGH.CQURT.PF CHHAmSGARH. BILAS.PUR Second Appeal Np.268 rf 2005 1. Ganesh Das/S/o Late Panchu Das, by caste Satnami, aged ab^ut 62 years, Occupation Cultivation, R/o Shakti, Ward No.9, Kawardha, Tahsil 8s Distt. Kawardha (CG) 2. Dhanesh Das, S/o Late Panchu DaSy by caste Satnami, aged atout 58 ycars, Occupation Cultivation, R/o Shakti, Wai'd No.9, Kawardha, Tahsil 8s Distt. Kawardha 3. Punni Das^ S/o Late Panchu Das, by caste Satnami, aged about 54 years, Occupation Cultivation, R/o Shakti, Ward No.9, Kawardha, Tahsil &5 Distt. Kawardha (CG) RESPONDENTS/: (Defendants) Versus 1. Ganeshiya Bai, aged about 65 years, wife of Kejau (D/o Late Panchu), by caste Satnami, Occupation Cultivation and house wife, R/o Bijai, Tahsil & Distt. Kawardha (CG) 2. Nirsiya Bai, aged about 52 years, wife of Sukhram,. Occupation Cultivation and house wife, R/o Ghotiya, Tahsil 8s Distt. Kawardha (CG) 3. Benu Bai, aged about 48 years, wife of Vedprakash Satnami (D/o Late Panchu), by caste Satnami, Occupation Cultivation anid house wife, R/o Behind Dr. Bisen Hospital, Kawardha, Tahsil 8s Distt. Kawardha (CG) {Second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908} Present: Mr. R.N. Pandey, counsel for the appellants. Mf \ Sinele Bench: Hon^ble Mr, T.P, Sharma, J ORAL ORDBR (31-3-2009) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment & decree dated 20-4-2005 passed by the Additional District Judge (F.T.C.), Kabirdham (Kawardha) in Civil Appeal No,6A/2003,affirming the judgment 85 decree dated 31-3-2003 passed by the Civil Judge Class-II, Kawardha in Civil Suit No.232-A/2002. 2. Heard on I.A^No. 1, application for withdrawal of the appeal. 3. Leamed counsel for the appellants submits that the parties have entered into compromise and on the basis of compromise, the appellants do not want to prosecute the appeal. 4. I.A.No. 1 is allowed and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge \^