IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16325 of 2009 RAJA SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 17.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner has been made accused in Sheohar P S Case No.111 of 1991 which was registered under sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code and 27/ 135 of Customs Act. As per the FIR petitioner was caught with certain smuggled goods like computer parts and foreign books. He was granted bail way back on 7.1.1992 but thereafter he has been absconding from law and he has finally been arrested. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that initially the case was lodged in Sitamarhi but subsequently the case was transferred to the Special Court, Economic Offences, Muzaffarpur. Since no process or summons was served upon the petitioner, he could not appear before the court and therefore, bail granted to him earlier has been cancelled and warrant of arrest issued. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits and states before the Court that his client is willing to appear on each and every date if he is enlarged on bail and undertakes to co-operate in the trial of the matter. With a solemn statement having been made at the bar with regard to the co-operation in the trial, let petitioner Raja Sah be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with two - 2 - sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of P.O. (Spl.), Economic Offences, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sheohar P S Case No. 111 of 1991 subject to the condition that one of the surety will be executed by the father/brother of the petitioner and the other by a Government servant, on due identification by the court below. It is categorically recorded that if petitioner does not appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, the court below has freedom to deny him the privilege of bail granted by this Court. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)