IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7860 of 2010 1. SITAL KUER DEVI W/O JIWANAND SINGH R/O VILL.- DAMARICHAK, P.S.- DHANARUA, DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1. SMT. UMA DEVI W/O OM PRAKASH SINGH R/O VILL.- DAMARICHAK, P.S. DHANARUA, DISTT.- PATNA 2. SAKALDEO PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE BRAHMDEO SINGH R/O VILL.- RAMDEOCHAK, P.O. KARAUNA (JEHANABAD), DISTT.- JEHANABAD, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT POSTAL PARK ROAD, NO.4, P.S.- JAKKANPUR, DISTT.- PATNA 3. URMILA DEVI W/O JAI PRAKASH SINGH R/O VILL.- RAMGARH MALI, P.S. KARPI, DISTT.- JEHANABAD 4. OM PRAKASH SINGH S/O RAM CHANDRA SINGH R/O DAMARICHAK, P.S. DHANARUA, DISTT.- PATNA 5. SATEYENDRA KUMAR S/O OM PRAKASH SINGH AND UMA DEVI R/O DAMARICHAK, P.S. DHANARUA, DISTT.- PATNA 6. MUKESH KUMAR S/O OM PRAKASH SINGH AND UMA DEVI R/O DAMARICHAK, P.S. DHANARUA, DISTT.- PATNA 7. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COLLECTOR, PATNA ----------- 2/ 10/02/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 22.12.2009 in Title Suit No.3/05 of the A.D.J.-11 at Patna marking a certified copy of the ‘Will’ as an exhibit, allegedly in violation of the provisions of Section-65 of the Indian Evidence Act. The impugned order marks the exhibit with objection. If a document has been exhibited, that is not proof of the correctness of the documents, much less its contents which still has to be proved in accordance with law, if an objection has been taken to the admissibility of the document. That is a matter to be decided in the trial of the suit determining the evidentiary value of the document in accordance with law only whereafter it can - 2 - be considered for purposes of adjudication. The writ application is disposed with the aforesaid observations. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)