1 Amk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4866 OF 2009 Jaitun Mahila Swai Sahayata Bachat Gat.. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. Mukesh Aiya for the Petitioner. Mr. R. M. Patne AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Manoj Kadam i/b Mr. Pratap Patil for Respondent No.4. CORAM : MRS. R. S. DALVI, J. DATE : 11th March, 2010. P.C. 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. 2. The petitioner and respondent No.4 claim to run a ration shop. The petitioner is a Mahila Bachat Gat which was incorporated two days prior to last date on which the application for conducting ration shop is to be submitted as per the advertisement governing parties dated 04.02.2008. Respondent No.4 is a handicapped person from SC/ST category who has obtained the disability certificate and the caste certificate. He has also produced the leave and licence agreement of 5 years from the persons who own the shop licenced to him. 3. The learned Minister has to consider the rival contention. The petitioner was not served with the copy of revision application. That fact is conceded. The petitioner contends that therefore he could not put up his case on 2 merits. 4. Respondent No.4 shall serve a copy of revision application upon the petitioner forthwith. The petitioner may file his reply thereto. The Learned Minister shall consider the application as well as reply on merits within four weeks from today and pass a reasoned order. 5. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. 6. The learned Minister shall serve a copy of the order upon the petitioner within one week of passing the order. 7. The Writ Petition is allowed and Rule is made absolute accordingly. (R. S. DALVI, J.)