IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9013 of 2009 1. VISHWANATH SINGH, son of late Sheo Prasad Singh 2. Ranjit Kumar Singh, son of Chandra Bhushan Singh Both residents of village-Fuha, P.S.-Barhara, Distt.-Arah(Bhojpur)------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.13459 of 2009 SHRI BHAGWAN SINGH, son of Vishwanath Singh, resident of village-Fuha, P.S.-Barhara, Distt.-Arah(Bhojpur) ------------------------------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is land dispute in between the parties who are Gotia. Allegation of theft is super-addition while there is no allegation against the petitioners about causing any injury. They are simply members of the mob. So, their arrest cannot be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Barhara P.S. case no.338 of 2008, the above named petitioners of the two petitions shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )