IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.836 of 2011 Arjun Mistri, Son of Ram Swroop Mistri, resident of Village- Thekhi, P.S. Halsi, District- Lakhisarai...........................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR..............Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 04.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 494, 498(A), 307/34, 379, 323 of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the D. P. Act. It is alleged that the petitioner is performed second marriage and used to torture the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Durgesh Nandan, submits that the petitioner performed second marriage with consent of first wife since no issue was born with first wife which has been denied by the learned counsel for the complainant by submitting that from the first wife there is one daughter. Learned counsel for the complainant on instructions submits that the complainant is still ready to resume the conjugal life provided she is not being tortured. Learned counsel for the petitioner on 2 instructions submits that the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. On consideration of the aforesaid submissions from both sides, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 799 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Nawada, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. If the petitioner will violate substantially the terms and undertaking as given before this Court then the complainant will be liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)