1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. RSA No. 604 of 2008 alongwith COPC 38 of 2010. Decided on: 6.5.2011 1. RSA No. 604 of 2008 Govind Ram & others ……….Appellants Versus Mohan Lal & others ……….Respondents. 2. COPC No. 38 of 2010. Mohan Lal & others ……….Petitioners. Versus Govind Ram & others ……….Respondents. ____________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________ RSA No. 604 of 2008 For the appellants : Mr. N.K. Sood, Advocate with all the appellants. For the respondents : Mr. Vinay Thakur, Advocate with respondent No. 2. COPC No. 38 of 2010. For the petitioners : Mr. Vinay Thakur, Advocate with petitioner No. 2. For the respondents : Mr. N.K. Sood, Advocate with all the respondents. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. 2 Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) CMP No. of 2011. The parties have filed an application under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, whereby the matter has been compromised between the parties. The same is permitted to be taken on record. The Registry is directed to assign number to the application. It stands disposed of. RSA No. 604 of 2008 Consequently, with the consent of the parties, the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Mandi in Civil Appeal No. 10 of 2007, dated 18th October, 2008 shall be substituted in the following manner: a) That the plaintiffs Mohan Lal and Chint Ram alongwith others are also the poojaries of Godess “Mata Chaturbhuja” and that Godess “Mata Chaturbhuja” shall keep on visiting both Villages i.e. Tarour and Movei Seri in the manner it was being followed earlier, as the main abode of Mata is at Tarour. Neither of the parties shall claim exclusive right to keep the Mata/Godess at one particular village. b) Inhabitants of village Movei Seri and Tarour and all other worshipers of Goddess “Mata Chaturbhuja” shall have right to worship the Goddess without any interference of any kind from either of the parties. 3 2. The terms and conditions incorporated herein above shall form an integral part of the judgment and decree passed by this Court. Accordingly, the Regular Second Appeal stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. COPC No. 38 of 2010. In view of the order passed in the judgment rendered in RSA No. 604 of 2008, the present petition is rendered infructuous. The notices issued to the respondents are discharged. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge May 6, 2011. (hl)