[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLN.NO. 351 OF 2008 IN CRI.APPLN.NO.1583 OF 2008 WITH CRI.APPLN.NO. 352 OF 2008 IN CRI.APPLN.NO.1582 OF 2008 M/s.S.B.Products ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Anil V.Dhavale advocate for Applicant Mr.K.V.Saste APP for the State in Appln.No.351 of 2008 Ms.P.P.Shinde APP for the State in Appln.No.352 of 2008 ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 8, 2008 DATE : JULY 8, 2008 DATE : JULY 8, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By order dated 14.5.2008, bail order of the applicant was continued on the applicant depositing Rs.25,000/-. The said amount had to be deposited on 30.6.2008. The applicant is seeking extension of the said period. 2. The learned advocate for the applicant has stated that he has got two Demand Drafts in the sum [-2-] of Rs.25,000/- dated 28.5.2008. Copy of the said Demand Drafts are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. They are kept in respective proceedings. 3. Looking to these facts, time period stated in the order dated 30.6.2008 is extended upto 31.7.2008. 4. Both the applications are disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]