HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIASPUR Wrrl' Pafrhon Na 1656 of 2003 Pe‘l'rhonar ; , Dr. Shrima'h Purnlma RaJ agad abam 32 years, W/o Dr. 5. K. Kachhamha, R/o 6-3 Type STreeT 12 2/A Hasp’i‘ml Sector, Bhilui, District ' Durg (Chhamsgarh) Versus Respondznfs 1. Sh'l’z 0f Chhnffisgarh, Thrbugh fh: Chief Secretary, Depnrfmaht of Heal'rh and Family Weifare and Medical Education DzK.5 Bhavnn, Monmiayu Ralpur {Chhmsgarh} Sfm‘c of Chhnfnsgarh Through The Sacra-raw Depar'rman't cf Heai‘th and Family Welfare and Median! Education D K5 Bhnvan Mon‘l'raluya ‘ Rmpur (Chhnfhsgnrh) i Director ‘ Medical Educa'ha‘n‘ Govammenf of Chha‘H’isgarh Rmpur '(Chhn‘r‘nsgarh) , Chha‘msga: h Pubiic Service Commission, 1hrough ‘i'he' Secrefnry 5hankor Nagor Rood, - Roipur v 492001 .(chhnmsgarh) Bean "JNM Medicoi College, Raiur , (C 5) WRIT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 225 OF THE CONSTITUTION Of INDIA smgta 3am Hon'hle Mr sum“ Agmhom J - i 5hr: Jri'endm Pail Advoco'i'z for ‘H’ie pe'i‘moner i ' _ €m1' Emma Ghm Pmzi Lawyer for 'H'ie responderrrs No l *o 3 5hrl Sony); K. Agarwai, Advoco'l'e for fhe. responden-i’ No:4. . p Thdmr w’L/ ORAL mDER (Passed on 'rhis 24'“ day of July, 2008) Learned caunsel nppzaring for ihe pzfi‘rionar, an insi'mc'rion, submifs 'Hmf with 1412 passage of fime ‘this pa'mion has bzmme infmcmous. Thus, iha pe‘ti‘fioner mks +o wi'thdraw *his pe+i+ion. i mmed counsel appearing far fhz raspondzn'rs have no objecfian. ‘In view of +he above, +he pei'i'fian is dismissed as miihdr-awn, as having bemme infmchmus. _ Sd/— f” ‘\ Satish K. Aglihotri _ \ Judge V ’ \‘rh \‘A f/~~~k § xx