1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29/06/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN Writ Petition (MD) No.6927 of 2011 Parani Spinning Mills Limited represented by its Managing Director NH7 Karur Road Vedasandur Dindigul District. ... Petitioner Vs The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Tel. No.1 EPF Organisation Regional Office Madurai - 2 ... Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the show cause notice in TN/MDU/circle/15 Damages/TN/29195/CA/2011 dated 02.06.2011 and quash the same and direct the respondent not to pursue further pending disposal of the appeal No.ATA 77(13) of 2010 before the Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi. For petitioner ...Mr.V.O.S.Kalaiselvam For Respondents ...Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen Addl. Government Pleader O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. Challenging the show cause notice issued by the respondent, dated 02.06.2011, the present writ petitioner is filed. 4. Admittedly, the petitioner has given an explanation for the said show cause notice stating that the appeal in ATA 77 (13) is pending before the Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi. The respondent will have to consider the said explanation and has to take a further recourse. While so, without challenging the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 order passed by the respondent, the petitioner hurriedly has approached this Court challenging the show cause notice. 5. In view of the above stated position, I am not inclined to interfere with the show cause notice issued by the respondent dated 02.06.2011 and the writ petition stands disposed of. However, it is needless to say that the respondent has to consider the explanation offered by the petitioner stating that the appeal preferred by him before the Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi is pending. As and when order is passed, if it is adverse against the petitioner, it is open to the petitioner to approach this Court. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Tel. No.1 EPF Organisation Regional Office Madurai - 2 RR rl/2c – 19.7.2011 W.P.(MD) No.6927 of 2011 29.06.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/