1 CRI.APPLN.NO.3002/2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 913. APPLN/3002/2011 RAM MURLIDHAR DAKE AND ORS [Criminal] V/S THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.B.Ghute, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. V.D.Godbharle, APP for State. Mr. S.D.Ghayal, Adv., for respondent no.2. ... CORAM: A.H.JOSHI AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATE:SEPT., 15th, 2011 1. The contents of the complaint disclose that, while complainant admits his signature, and presence in the Registrar's office, etc., he claims that, under intoxication he was brought there by the accused. 2. Contents of the complaint do adequately describe commission of the offense. There is no ground for granting indulgence whatsoever. Whatever petitioners are claiming is in the nature of defense, which has to be used in the trial and not for quashing. 3. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. (A.R.JOSHI) (A.H.JOSHI) JUDGE JUDGE agp/3002-11crapl