IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 89 (S/B) of 2008 Mahendra Kumar Tayal S/o Shri Madho Ram R/o 26-Engineers Enclave, GMS Road, Dehradun. ………….. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through its Secretary, Public Works Department Uttarakhand, Secretariat, Dehradun – 248 001. 2. Chief Engineer, Level-1, P.W.D. Uttarakhand Yamuna Colony, Dehradun. …………. Respondents Sri D.S. Mehta, Advocate holding brief of Sri M.C. Pant, Advocate present for the petitioner. Sri Subhash Upadhyay, Advocate present for the respondents. Dated : November 09, 2009 Coram : Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. (By the Court) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to issue no dues certificate to the petitioner and to release his post retiral dues. Also further mandamus has been sought commanding the respondent no.1 to take final decision on the basis of the enquiry report in the matter of 2 disciplinary enquiry pending against the petitioner within a period of 15 days. 3. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.1 in which it has been stated that no dues certificate has already been issued to the petitioner. It is also stated in the Counter affidavit that directions has been issued for release of the post retiral dues to the petitioner after considering the departmental enquiry report. 4. In view of the above, developments as stated in counter affidavit, this writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Alok Singh, J.) (Prafulla C. Pant, J) 09.11.2009 JKJ