IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44005 of 2010 MD.SFEDUL @ SAFEDUL & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --------- 02/ 19.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioners seek their bail in connection with Complaint Case no.2807C/2008 for the offence punishable under section 498A of the IPC. Admittedly, petitioner no.1 is the husband whereas petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are brothers-in-law of the complainant. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that complainant was represented before the Additional Sessions Judge, Purnea as the learned counsel for the complainant had placed arguments before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Purnea that the complainant is ready to compromise, if her Dain Mohar is returned to her by petitioner no.1. It appears that the complainant is more interested to take back her Dain Mohar in stead of leading her conjugal life with petitioner no.1. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, petitioners Md Safedul @ Safedul, Hedayat @ Md Hedayat and Md Saddam are directed to be released on bail in connection with Complaint Case no. 2807C/2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Araria. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J) - 2 -