HIGH CQURT OF CHHA’E’TISGARH AT BILAS?UR DWiSlON BENCH CQRAM: HON’BLE SHRE RAJEEV GUPTA Cu}. & HON’%LE 8%Rl 3UNIL KLEMAR $§NF€A J. W.P.€C} No.4758 of 2%3 mven Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., A Campany Registered and {he Companies Act having its registered Office at 27/1, Pate! Nagar, Mam Road; indore 452001 (MR) Through its Author§eed representative Manish Singh Sikarwar Sic 8.8. Sikarwar, Aged about 37 years, Rio C-M/HS Sukhliya, rndare (Madhya Pradesh) Versus RESPQNDENTs 1. The State of Chhatiisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, DrKBr Bhawan‘ Mantralay‘, Ralpur, Chhattisgarh, 2. The Director, Directorate 0i Health Services, behind Marrtralaya, Raipur Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Joint Director Cum Chairman, Purchase Sommlttee Ministry of Department of Healtt’i and Family Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur, Chhattiegarh, Witt {-‘etittea Under Articte 22$ cf the Censtitutien at India thresent : Shri Praehant Mishra, learned counsel for the ,eetittener. Shrt NK. Agrawal, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents. cReER l (29m August, geee) The fottowing Order of the Court was passed by Rageev Gupta, Gui $hri NKr Agrawat, learned Deputy Advocate Generai has raised a preiimtnary objection about the maintainabitity of the writ l i i b). petition 0n the ground tmt the peiitioner has filed this petition in undue haste as the respondents have not taken any finei decisien in the matter so fen 2. in View of the above objection, Shri Prashant Miehra, ieemed counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw ’zhe writ petition with the liberty of filtng another writ petition for the redreesel of the petitioner’s grievances, if the future devetopm ents e0 werrent. 3. Permission granted. 4. With the above liberty! the writ petition is dismissed as Withdrawn. - 3 Sd/- v t Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge i l i i l i i Sdf- ‘ i Chief Justice