HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT MLASPUR WMT PETTnON No. 3495 <rf-2003 __ss .^KWi- .^iWSSSSSis PETITIONER : Sampat Lal Sao S/o Shiv ftaaad Sao, Aged about 62 years, R/o '\SUago BlM:tari{Wli, P.0. Jhahnala, Distt.Kaigarh (&©.) i - VERSUS .,.•,': >' " : ' RESPONDENT8 : 1. State of Chhatftisgarh Departmait ef Education, D.K.S.BhawaaBa^air.F 2. Accountant General, Aecountent Oeneral OEGee, Raipur. 3. Divisional Accountant & Pension Office, Ihrough Joined Director, Diyisional Aocountant & Pension Office, Bil^pur. 4. District Education Qfficer, District Edueation Office, Raigarfa. 5. Prineipal, Govt. High SiAoot, Renga^aK, Distt.Raigarii(C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OP THE CONSTTTUTIONOF INDIA . , , " , ; . ...!.:' •:',::'£ SB: Hon'Me Shri Sattsh K. Aeirihoti*, J. Preseat: ShriAmitShamia, Advocatefarthepetitioner. ^ Ms. Sunita Jain, Paael Lawyer for the State/respondent No, 1, 4and5. Ms. Sharmila Sii^hai. Advoeate for the respondent No. 2. ORALORDER liS (Passed on 23" day of Jufy, 2008) ^...•^SWSsS^ With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finallv. • •? 1. This matter pertams to payment ofretiral beaefits 2. ITiis Court, in the matter of W.P. NQ. 4642/2004 (Baijnatb Mmdal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) 'and othffl- c<amected mattens, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were invdved. The iCanmittee was constituted by tfie Sitate Govemment, pursiant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandraka- Vs. State Govermnent and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in 'St. ./ &. ~ ^. I 1 'w<^ "^••^.^ .^.^' -<^^ ..<:./^ _,;.i^.-^i5~K^-^' M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (Stete of Chhattisgarh & Otfaere Vs. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely cov»ed by the judgment and order dated 31 of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. With the conseirt ofthe parties, this petition is accordmgly disposed of in the same terms i.e. the ofBce ofthe Advoeate General is directed to sead the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days fi»na-thedate -f'. •'•• --^ •" of receipt of a copy ofthe petition froin the petitioner and this order. Thereaflter, flie Conunittee shall i^ue notic«to ®ispetitioner and the officers cwicemed, within a farther period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in aceordance with law, after aftbrding proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the ofBcers concemed may file additional documeHts, if netassary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period offour months fcwn the date of receipt ofa copy ofltais order. The petitioner shall supply extra eopy ofthe petition to Ms. Sunita Jain, Paael Lawyer tbr the State/respondait No. 1, 4 and 5 fos fbrwarding the same to the Committee. --— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judee Assvt