IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2128 of 1991 Date of decision:20.05.2009 Bhim Sain Gandhi ...Petitioner versus Rajinder Kumar and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr.Harminder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. M.L.Sarin, Senior Advocate with Ms.Hemani Sarin, Advocate for the respondents. ----- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. Counsel for the both the parties submitted that the tenant has vacated the premises and delivered the possession of the property to the landlord and as such, the Civil Revision could be disposed of as having become infructuous. 2. As ordered, the Civil Revision is dismissed as infructuous. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 20.05.2009 sanjeev