1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11995 OF 2011 ,In CRAST/25654/2011 VITTHAL ABARAO GADAVE, DIED THR. L.R. SANTOSH VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ANR ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Ingale Vivekanand V. AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.VH Dighe. --- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 21st NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : 1) Heard Mr.Ingle and learned AGP. There is delay of 625 days in filing the CRA . It has occasioned, owing to dismissal of claim reference on 15.10.2009 by learned District Judge-2, Osmanabad. Reading the order, it is clear, original claimant did not tender any other evidence in support of his contentions and also in respect of the fact that he is entitled for the additional compensation as claimed. 2) Learned AGP submits the CRA is not maintainable. However, since the very claim of the claimant is dismissed, CRA would, certainly, be maintainable. 2 3) During the course of submissions, learned Counsel for the claimant/revision applicant submits that the revision applicant shall not claim interest for the period from the date of judgment dated 15.10.2009 till the revision is registered. Accepting this statement, delay of 625 days, being sufficiently explained, suffering from health problems during the period, could not contact to his advocate, is condoned. CA for condonation of delay allowed as above. The revision application to comply other office objections, if any. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/