IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29984 of 2010 MUKESH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 20.09.2010 Petitioner being the husband is languishing in jail since 07.01.2010 in a case registered under Sections 304B, 34 of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is admitted case that the victim jumped before the running train resulted into her death. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that on the allegations level led in the F.I.R., at best the case under Section 306 is made out. It is also submitted by the petitioner that other accused have been granted bail. Learned counsel for the State Mr. Mehta submits that there is an allegation of torture and assault prior to the occurrence. Considering the facts that petitioner is the husband, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present. The prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. However, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after six months. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)