IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 969 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: May 18, 2011. Meera and Company Limited. ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus H.M.T. Limited, Pinjore and another. ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. I.K.Mehta, Senior Advocate with Mr. M.S.Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Lalit Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.1. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing order dated 29.01.2011 passed by respondent No.2 with the prayer that appointment of respondent No.2 as Arbitrator be set aside. It has been contended by learned counsel for the respondent No.1 that he is having no objection if the present petition is accepted and respondent No.1 be allowed to appoint some other person as Arbitrator. CR No.969 of 2011 Hence, in view of the same, the impugned order passed by respondent No.1 appointing respondent No.2 as Arbitrator and impugned order dated 29.01.2011 passed by respondent No.2-Arbitrator, are set aside. Respondent No.1 is directed to appoint some other person as an Arbitrator as per arbitration clause of the agreement. Disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) May 18, 2011. JUDGE 'om' 2