IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 16745 of 2008 Between: Mandala @ Boddu Chaintanya W/o.Augustin 19-8-133/A Rangashaipet Division 11, 19th Warad, Warangal ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector Warangal 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Warangal District 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer Warangal 4 Gyrepalli Sreemathi @ Geetha W/o.Pulluru Suresh H.No.13- 6-106 Yellam Bazar Warangal .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the 2nd respondent by selecting and appointing the 4th respondent herein as a Fair Price Shop Dealer of Shop No.282 pursuant to the Notiﬁcation Dt.27-06-2008 as illegal arbitrary and contrary to the conditions stipulated in the Notiﬁcation and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the as Fair Price Shop Dealer for the Shop No.282 Rangashaipet Warangal and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: Acknowledging the inappropriateness of ﬁling a Writ Petition within 5 days of ﬁling an appeal before the 1st respondent, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would like to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to ﬁle a Writ Petition as and when reasonable grievance of protracting consideration of the appeal or abdication of the 1st respondent’s responsibility of considering the appeal, is perceived. Granting liberty as sought, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. GODA RAGHURAM, J Date: 01.8.2008 cvm