IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5973 of 2007 Date of Decision: March 26, 2009 Sarwan Singh … Petitioner Versus Rohi Ram and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : Mr. Sanjeev Manrai, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sherry K. Singla, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 10. S.D. Anand, J. The petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court to dispose of the suit itself by or on 30.04.2009. It is common ground that the evidence of the plaintiff – petitioner has already been concluded. The defendants – respondents shall be entitled to have two adjournments for concluding their evidence. If any party is inclined to summon any official witness, it shall be entitled to take dasti summons but the non return or non-effecting of service thereof would not entitle that party to ask for any further adjournment. C.R. No. 5973 of 2007 Till the conclusion of the trial aforementioned, the plaintiff – petitioner shall not cause the averred obstruction; while the respondent shall not proceed with the brick lining of the pavement. The acknowledgment (of a copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned District Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by afore-mentioned period. Disposed of accordingly. March 26, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2