^' ^e^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP N0. ^S 2 O /2003 PETITIONER R.K. Pandey, son of Shri L.B. Pandey, aged about 52 years, working as Senioi^ Store Keeper, Hindustan Steel^^Construction Limited, Bhilai, resident of Mother Paresia Nagar, Camp No.2, Qtr No. 43/12, Bhilai (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. ..•^^" ^•T^ A^' 7 Hindustan Steel Construction Through Its Deputy General Manager, Hindustan Steel Construction Limited, New Delhi. The Deputy General Manager, Hindustan Steel Construction Limited, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (CG) The Deputy Manager (Pers.) (E 8s C), Hindustan Steel Construction Limited, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 2267227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR DIRECTION IN VIEW OF THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, •f T' XI-HC-22 311^1 ^FT f^iw^n^r ^^[W-^I 'TO? ^l^lld^t, ^^t^^Ko, M<VSi^ll< 3??^r ^^^ ,U...fi.....ti.O,.^(^ ^^ST WW11 ^*11^ 3^1^l ^WI^R 06.02.2004 Smt. Fouzia Mirza, couns^ { Th|e tHat siJLfferirig doriie ShriV.V.S.Murthy, C • co^nsel The petitioner has preferted 226/227 ofthe Constitution of] dated 28.08.2003, whereby he Unit Incharge, Bhadrawati. Storc Keeper at Hiadustan Steel] The petitioner^s case is siace last 4 years aad she is her radiofherapy is beiag Hospital aad she is regularly ia if the petitioner's traasfer is Bhadrawati, fhere is no account ofthis traasfer, the Counsel for fhe petitiotijer petitioner's difficulty, fhe petiti|oner rcpresentation to respondent No.| to consider the case offhe petiti^ner. Haviag heard learaed rcgard to the facts and allowed to make a detailed raisiag all his grievances witlunj rcspondent No.2 shall decide tht another 30 days considering treataiekit cofcmsel circuiaslaaces 'sbl^fd^l'i ^l44df ^ f€l<l<F3<^K '^3rf^R3T?^T s^l for the petitioner, for the ^e^gondents» irfed this Writ Petition under Article |lndia, challengiag his traiisfer order bas been traasferrcd froin BhUai to petitioner is workiag as a Senior pDnstruction Ltd,, BhUai. the petitioner>s wife is a patient fiiom 3rd stage of cancer and regularly at Bhilai Steel Plant tieed of some medical attendaat aad a|Qlowed to be impleniented fhen at facillty of caacer patient and on wiU sufiFer irrcparable loss. >njer subinits that ia view of fhe iti|oner may be allowed to make ®i^ .P aad respondent No.2 be dirccted iti^ner. for the pardes aiid haviag ofthecase, fhe petitioner is rclpresentation to respondent No.2, a period of 10 days aad ia tiini, th^ representation withia a period of ^ll his grievaaces raised by fhe peti^ioner li T XI-HC-22 3^^1'^T f^-ri^^n^? ^ ^RW^tn Po.SUv)^ ^y ^" T55f ^IS^Id^ ^Tli^^Ko, fa^t^y €) WW?JT ^HI^ 37?^T ^S^K .M£.:...s^o.(.®:3.•^ 200 'I^ST' ^^T^^TIW ^rt^T petitioner and pass a reasonetl reUeved, he should not be reUe^ed The petition is disposed Consequentiy, M.W.P.N^ urgent hearing disposed of, Certified copy as per nde^. order aad if fhe petitioner is not tUl fhe representation is decided. c|f accordirigly. t).3191/03 and I.A.No. 10097 for ^bl^td^l'i ^H<?il ^ feczt ^^K '^3ri^m3??^r Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge i [^^a^