‘/[in / (é ® Kg? ’%,LR gmgm gwych IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPEnn0N(s)No. VM} /zoo9 PETITIONER . Dhammpal Singh Sengar, S/o. Shr'i Ramdulare Singh Sengar', Aged abou’r 38 years, R/o. Q‘rr‘. No. E—105, Near of Range Police, M.T. Work Shop, Police Line, Bilaspur, Tah & Dish‘. Bilaspur' (C.G.). VERUS S Mag/1 fgk W?) RESPONDENTs 1. ’“swe of ehharrisgarh, Through fhe Secre‘rar‘y, Departmenf of Home, . Montralaya, D.K.S. Bhowan, Raipur'. 2. KR The Direc’ror' General of Police. Police Headquor‘rer, Roipur', (C.G. ) ( or“ 3. The Deputy Superin’renden’r of Police, Police Vehicle Workshop, Raipur (C.6.) ys/ 4. Sfo‘fe of Madhya Pradesh, Through fhe Secrefary, Departmen’r of Home, Vailabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) WRIT PETITION VUNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONsTITUTION OF INDIA W W ‘ m ~ .........NPCEQ‘H'I’I/gi 72007 : WWW wmm mmm mm (Wu) WW WW $a‘fmm SB : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER Q3.08.2009 1 for the petitioner. . for the State. t petition is to the order dated 2009 passed by the respondents No. § been ailocated to the State of MP. on the basis of mutual consent and has been relieved from the State of Chhattis garh. the petitioner is that he has made several representations but none of the representation has been decided by the respondent No. 1 be issued to the respondents for the petitioner. Counsei for the State contends that in fact the petitioner ought , to have made representation to Shri Arvind Dubey, coufls: Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. G.A Challenge in the preser 26. 10.2007 and order dated 18.5 1 8s 2 whereby the petitioner ha, 81s 2. He submits that direction may deciding the said representations of Contention of counsel for Union of India also raising all his grievances and then only the action can be taken by respondents No.1’ 85 2. He further contends i authorities and the same would be decided in accordance with law. At this stage counsel for-t present petition with liberty as aforesaid. In the eventuality ofi filing fresh representation by the petitioner before the competent month, the same is %pected to months from the date of its recei; Sd/- i ii“ Pritinker Diwaker hat let the petitioner make a fresh representation to the competent be permitted to withdraw the he petitioner contends that he may authorities within a period of one be decided Within a period of three t. Judge ,