THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11564 of 2008 ORDER: Today though W.V.M.P.No.2416 of 2008 in W.P.M.P.No.14932 of 2008 is listed under the caption ‘for Interlocutory’, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal, at the request of the learned counsel on either side. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction by way of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in interfering with the construction work taken up by him in Plot No.42 admeasuring 477 sq.yards in Sy.No.74/9, East Marredpally, Secunderabad as per building permissions vide permit Nos.158/27 and 158/28 of 2008 obtained by him, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner claims to be the absolute owner and possessor of open plot bearing No.42 admeasuring 477 sq. yards in Sy.No.74/9 situated at East Marredpally village, Secunderabad. It is the grievance of the petitioner that though the said property is the private property owned by him and he obtained valid permissions vide permit Nos.158/27 and 158/28 of 2008 from the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, for construction of a building in the said plot, the respondents are causing interference with his construction over the subject property. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Assignment appearing for the respondents. It is not in dispute that with regard to the subject property, the respondents have already filed LGC.No.167 of 1997 before the Special Court under A.P.Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad, alleging that the petitioner is a land grabber. It is stated that the said L.G.C. was dismissed, as against which, the respondents have carried the matter in Writ Petition being W.P.No.19106 of 2010 before this Court. However, in the said L.G.C.No.167 of 1997, by virtue of the very claim of the respondents, the possession of the petitioner over the plot in question is admitted. It is to be noticed that as per permit Nos.158/27 and 158/28 of 2008 issued by the competent authority i.e., Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, the petitioner has proceeded with the construction work in the subject property. For the aforesaid reasons, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondents not to interfere with the constructions covered under valid permit Nos.158/27 and 158/28 of 2008 issued in favour of the petitioner in respect of Plot No.42 in Sy.No.74/9 of East Marredpally, Secunderabad. However, it is made clear that such constructions shall be subject to final orders in W.P.No.19106 of 2010, which is filed by the respondents against the judgment passed in LGC.No.167 of 1997 on the file of the Special Court under A.P.Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad. Subject to the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY 29.06.2011 kvni