?et§iioner Respendenis @ i-iiGH C§§RT OF CHHATTI$i§A¥§H AT EILASPUR Writ Pemion $$227j No.4222 0f 231? Deepak Kumal Salaf SIG Matllal Saraf, aged abcut 46 years, R/o Link Road, Main Raad, EHaspur, Tahs§¥ and District Bi!aspur (CG). ’ersus Rashlm Slngh Sx'o Shrl Dharmendra Singh, aged about 44 yeare‘ presentiy residmg a% mfmnt cf Agya Nagar, Vyapar Bihar Road, Bilaspur (CG). 2. Smi.Sumitra Devl Saraf W/c Molllal ‘ Saraf, aged abaut 65 year's. 3. Shlv Kumr Saraf Sic Medial Saraf, aged about 50 years. Motiiai Saraf S/o Late Shri Nathuiai Saraf, aged about 73 yearS. (SW02 fa 4 raskient of Link Rdad, Bdaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C G) i 5. Municipal Corporatien, Ei§aspur, ,. Municipai Ccrporadon, Baasp District Buaspur (CG). 6. The Manager, Chhaidagarh Gram’m Bank, Link Road, Biiaspur (CG). 7. The Siate of Chamsgarh, thrcug‘n Collectcr, Bilaspur (CG). (Writ Peimcn under Article 227 of the Constitution of india) \._ E1H ,g h through its Chief Municipal Offiven C: 1', Mr.Shaiiendra Dubey, counsel fer the petltloner. Mr.Sumlt Jhanwar, Panel Lawyer for respondent No.7l$tate. (SB: Han’ble Mr. TR Sharma. J.} SREER idem} {2-8.261 1} x_. . By thlspelltlcm under Adicle 227 of the Canetilutlon sf lne‘la the petltlener has chalengea’ lhe legality and prepréety cf the arder daled 21.7.2907 paesed by 'zhe Seccnd Addltldnal Dietr'ci Judge, Blleepur ln Clvll Sul‘i No.21 —A/20G6 paesed in Lek Adalat. [m .2, 2. Learned counsei for the petmoner submks that iha present petitmna was paw befare the Second Additionai Disirict Judge, Biiaspur but without issuing natice i0 the petiticner ihe aforesaid order has been passed effectmg rights and obHgations of the petitioner, therefore, he seeks ta withdiaw this writ petiiien with iibeity t0 fiie appropiiaie appiication foi' setting aside ex—parie order/appmpriete direction {eiating to the fact of decree. Cider passed by ihe Court beiow in Lok Adaiai appears the? ihe preseht petiiioner was noi pariy to such order but previous decree has been deciared as nuii and void vide aferesaid arder. . . Considering the pecuiier r'ecis, the writ peiiiion is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid iiberiy. No order as to costs. Sdl— T.P. Sharma Judge C)s