n4b 454 a 1 9 INTHE HIGI COURT OF PUNJAB 8IRYANA AT 1 CHANDIGARH 1e CWPNo07 of2010 DateofDecisiol201 1 1 ParveenKumar ePetitioner Versus StateofHaryana andothers 2 CWPNo 19936of2009 MadanMohan andothers m4etitioners Versus 1 Q StateofHaryana andothers 3 CWP No511of2010 0 0 Om Parkash Petitioner Versus t5 State ofHaryana andothers I 4 4 CWP No 13860of2009 Z RajKumar son of SadhuRam 8cothcrs mPetitioners Versus 0 StateofHaryana and others 5 CWP No 14506of2009 t Lekh RajSoni another etitioncrs Z Versus r Marketing Board8canother 6 CWPNo 14547of2009 V7 Z Lalit Kumar 8i others mPetitioners m Versus Board r another 7 CWP No15394of2009 Mls DarshanLal Sanjeev Kumar c0thers Petitioners Versus Ieeme StateofHaryana and others 8 CWP No19533of2009 Mehtab Singh8 others mePetitioners Versus StateofHaryana and others Batra Amit 2014.04.23 11: 09 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 455 CWP No 407of2010 2 9 CWPNo 14760of2009 KashmiriLal mePetitioner Versus StateofHaryanaandothers 10 CWP No 17252of2009 RichhpalSingh mePetitioner Versus StateofHaryana and others 1 CORAM HONBLE MRJUSTICE PERMOD KOHL1 r Present Mr SS DinarpurAdvocatefor the 0 0 Mr RJO SharmaDG Haryana Co Mr Amit SharmaAdvocatefor no2 to 6 I e e B PERMOD KOHLIJ ORALI Z All thesepetitions involve common of laW based 0 identical facts These are being ofby I thiscommon order C3 Z Sincetheissues are gencral in nature factsof eacllcase are not OO beingdiscussed However resumeof thefacts is beingnoticedfrom CWP m No 407 of2010 Z Market Committees Bhiwani and Pipli Dm issuedadvertisementsinviting for of plots in open auction in New Grain Markets establishedin thesedistricts 4nee All the allottedplotsin the open auction 25010of the bid were moneywas to be at theinitial stagewhereasrest of the75Iosale price was to be deposited within 30 daysof the receiptl of allotment letter without interest or in halfyearlyinstallmentswith interest of 750Ioper annumaccruingfrom the date of issuanceof allotment letter One of the conditions in theallotmentletterrequired theallotteeto the Batra Amit 2014.04.23 11: 09 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 456 CWPNo 407 of2010 3m 1 r construction within one year from thedateofallotment It is common case of allhe thatneitherthe site was readyfor construction nor was offeredto the despite requests no6 vide letter dated askedthe to deposit thetotalamountwithin15daysIt is statedthatthe the amountof installmentsalongwith interestandpenalinteresteIt is case Of 1 the that despitedepositof theamount in some cases the C possesslOllwas not deliveredbythe Mket Committeeand 0 0 from time to time for deliveryof of the I plotsSome ofthe howeverstartedraisingconstruction C5 I and the constructionof shopsPetitionerwas issued a show Z cause noticedated2532006 whytheplotbe not resumed for raisingconstructionwithout and demarcation r Petitioner that he has raisedthe constructionin the I t0 2007 He was issuedanotherlctter dated2272008 to appearbefore Z the authoritiesfor violationof theconditionsno2 and17 of theallotment 00 4t letter In themeantimethe issuedan advertisementdated a Z 2472008 granting extension of 1 1 yearsfor raisingconstructionto the Il allotteeswho were plotspriorto 1032000 In responseto the advertisementthe communicated to the that in view ofthe latestpolicydecision dated2472008 thc is entitledto raise e construction Itis alleged thaton this replybeingOledthenoticeissuedto the petitionerwas not and to the contraryanotherletter dated 1822009was issued Rs2751001m as fee for the wef lo1987 to 31122008 in the lightof the decisionof the boarddated1412009 an Batra Amit 2014.04.23 11: 09 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 457 CWPNo 407of2010 m4m 1 r but the same was not considered The the flled CWP No 8151of2009titledas ParveenKumarVs State and others Thispetitionwas ofwith a directionto the to decide the within a periodof threemonthsfrom the dateofreceiptof certifledcopy of the order The of the has been vide orderdated 1682009and the have this Court and 0 following reliefsl 0 C40 iI issuea writ in the nature of Certioraritlreby the noticedated1822009 PelO7ide which an I ofRs2751001eis bcingdemandedfrom the 0 as feefor theperiodfrom 161987 to I 3112008 andalso for theorderdated Pe131 videwhichthe Z by no3i and C iil issue a writ in thenaturc 6f Mandamusthereby directing iiil also for directing the notto charge any non Z construction fee interestor from the and co bythe on his plotallottedbyMarketCommittee Vo terms8 mentionedin 10he allotmentletter Annexure Z P11 or QL in the justifiedtheir action and demandof fee on the groundthat the failed to raise constructionfor numberof years It is furtherpleaded that therewas no m requirementofdeliveryof physical of tholot as the allotment itselfwas thc modeof of It is also pleaded that the and thus the constructionraisedby the petitioner 1S competent illegal Batra Amit 2014.04.23 11: 09 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 458 CWPNo 407of2010 5e 1 1 bythis Court in a bunchof e Similar issuehasbeenconsidered writ beingCWP Noe1122 of 2003 titled as Raksha Rani Vsa HSAMB and and other connectedmattersdecidedon 2010 Onconsiderationof thevarious relieduponbytheauthorities includingthe of Honble Court in case of UeTe Administrationandanother Vse AmarjeetSinghand j others as JeT 2009 1 SC 39 and Municipal Chandigarh VSe InvestmentsPvte Ltde as 2006 0 0 SCC 109and followingobservationshavebeenmadele I C5 41 lI All cases toframing ofstatutoly rules I dated shall be bythecontract Urlderthe thereis no conditionor covenantthattheliabilityto Z interestshall be upon payinterest facilies ameltitiesSuchofthealloueeswhowere allotted C priorto 1032000 are liable to pay interestanclpenally I inaccordancewiththe terms andconditionsofthcallotment Z letler 2 Suchoftheallotteeswhowere afler2000are OQ 7 was made The is to be ofredfromthe Z date like roads water supply tl This theliabililyto pay interest underthe are made becomespayable jom tlledate basic are and is ofred 3 In sofaras theliabilityto pay is concerned at thetimeofallotmentofplotsin theyear 1988 therewas no eitherin thecontracl or any statutory payment ofextensionfee thejlrSltlme came to beintroducedvidepolicydecisiondated29A1998 andthus the onlyin respectofplots whereconstructionhasnot bcencarriedout in accordance withthe lerms and conditions dated Batra Amit 2014.04.23 11: 09 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWPNo 407 of2010 m 9 4p 29A998 11 1 Il Issues similar these are being of in termsofthe Copy of thisorderbeplaced on eachconnectedfile PERMOD KOHLII JTJDGE 1 C lucky 0 0 Ilo l e Z r Z 00 7 Z Om Batra Amit 2014.04.23 11: 09 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH Sahil Soni 2016.03.21 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document