J1 IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ic^ • Sin^eB€ M.C.C. N0; 2.VX OP 2011 Arising out oforderdated 26-8-2010 passedby thesingle Bench in HonTile Justice Shri Pritinkar Diwakar W P N0.774/2002) ^ ••<\^ APPLICANTS PETITIONER l.The Chief Executive Officer JilaPanchyat OfGce BHaspur.C.G.) ^^ ..x" .-.—" --^ 2. The chief E^ecutive officer, Janpad Panchyat, Block-Pathria Disst -Bilaspiir VERSUS /• NON-APPLICANTS 1. Manoj Kuntar Rajput, RESPONDENT S/oShriUttamSingh R/o. Village -Pathria District- BUaspur.fC G) 2. Presiding OfBcer Under the Industrial Dispute Act, Labour Court, Bilaspur APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OFTHE_W P N0. 774/2002 THIS WAS DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION ON 26TQ8-2010 XI-HC-22 •TST ^iNRTT, 's'ahns. fayi'M^ 31 <nticfTt»)*(ic»i SIT^T 1R^5 ^........./.A<.-.C,.fo&.:.^ ^ ''(FI, '200 ^re^g' 311^1 ^iT R-(i.<ti SII^T ^Rl^^tgicf ~> ^' ':^ c Ji aii^r ^BIIW ^i^i S.B.: HON'BLEJUgTICE MR. PBI-nNKER MWAKER 20.04.2011 Shri Vivek Verma, counsel foj Shri Vinay Pandey, couns advance copy. Heard on l.A. No, 01, filing the 'petition. This is not opposed by the Por the reasons mentioned i4 allcwed, The delay in filing the petitit) Heaid on M.C.C. No. 2l8/2()ll forrestorationofW.P. No. 774/021 Court vide order dated 26.08.2010 | Thls is not opposed by fhe cdj Por the reasons mentioned u|i aUowed. Accoidingly, M.C. C. No.218/|: 774/02 is restored to its origmal n^unber, ^l^ri^l'r ^Hcff^U'^^^R^R ^SrfiW 311^1 the applicaat. ^el for fhe respondent on applicatjon for condonation of delay in coi^nsel for the respondent. the application, the same is ^n is condoned. ., which is an applicatioa [which was disnussed by tfais |for waat ofpTosecution, ccjunsel for the respoadent. u|i tfae application, the saxne is 2011 is aUowed aad W.P.No, SdA. PritinkerDiwaker Judse [^^feit