(1) WP 3397.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3397 OF 2011 Shivaji Manikrao Dawane PETITIONER VERSUS Chandrakala Gajanan Aher RESPONDENT ..... Mr. M.P. Kale, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.S. Choudhari, Advocate for the Respondents. ..... CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J. DATED : 12TH DECEMBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally, with the consent of the parties. 2. The petitioner has challenged the order of proceeding the suit without any written statement. Without going into the merit of the case, since the written statement is already filed by the petitioner in the trial Court, it would be in the interest of justice to direct the learned trial Court to accept the written statement upon deposit of costs of ` 5000/- (` Five Thousand) in the trial Court, within a period of four (4) weeks from today. (2) WP 3397.2011 3. Rule is therefore made absolute in the above terms, without any order as to costs in the present Petition. Sd/- [M. T. JOSHI, J.] arp/