IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25066 of 2009 1. SURESH SHARMA 2. SUNAINA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIAHR . ----------- 2/ 17/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners, who are the father-in- law and mother-in-law, apprehend arrest in a police case under Sections- 304B, 201 and 34 of I.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner from the impugned order of rejection invites the attention of the Court to the fact that the petitioners were residing in the ancestral house when the deceased was residing with her husband at rented house at another place, a defence which has not been considered by the court below while noticing the materials from the case diary. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds 2 of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Tikari P.S. Case No.25/09, subject to the conditions laid down under Section- 438(2) Cr.P.C. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)