1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 261/2010 ( Sharad Gangadhar Shringar Pawar .vs. State of Maharashtra and another. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. Rajiv Chhabra, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. S.S. Doifode, APP for Respondent no.1. Mr. S. Dewani, Advocate for Respondent no.2. CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J. DATED : OCTOBER 15, 2010 Heard Mr. Chhabra, learned counsel for the applicant. By order dated 11.10.2010 I recorded the statement made by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has removed all the office objections. In view of the statement, I had directed the office to verify whether the objections are removed and if so the matter to proceed further. The office has made endorsement to the effect that the applicant has not removed the office objection no. 9(i) which reads thus:- “Obj.No.9(i) :- Page Nos. 82, 87, 88, 92 to 96, 157, 194, 254, 255, 258, 259, 265 & 286 are very faint & handwritten replacement necessary. But counsel for applicant has filed Cri. Appln No. 906/10, for dispensing with waiving of 2 documents.” Shri Chhabra seeks four weeks time to remove the office objections. On or before the next date, either the applicant shall remove the office objections or shall either replace those documents or remove those documents from the record. In view of this no orders are necessary on Criminal Application (APPP) No. 906/2010. Application stands disposed of. S.O. to 26.11.2010. JUDGE halwai