IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.24535 OF 2009 GOLO RAJWAR @ LALMUNI RAJWAR, SON OF MARACHU RAJWAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MANPURA, P.S. HASPURA, DISTRICT AURANGABAD VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 30.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. From the order of the learned Sessions Judge it appears that there are as many as 14 cases against petitioner from before. Considering the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to allow petitioner on bail. The application is rejected. Let the trial of the case be expedited. If the trial of the case is not concluded within one year, petitioner will be at liberty to renew his payer for bail. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)