RSA No. 1254 of 2009 ( 1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 1254 of 2009 Date of Decision: 21.7.2009 Joga Singh and others ......Appellants Versus Smt. Kirpal Kaur and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri Rajinder Goyal, Advocate, for the appellants. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral). The defendants are in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, arising out of a suit for possession. The plaintiff has claimed possession on the basis of title in respect of the land measuring 1 kanal 9 marlas. The defendants in written statement pleaded that the plaintiffs have exchanged the aforesaid land with the residential houses situated in Abadi Deh of the predecessor-in- interest of the defendants. The defendants have failed to prove the factum of exchange. On account of failure to prove exchange, the Courts below have decreed the suit for possession on the basis of title. The findings recorded are sought to be disputed by way of re- appreciation of evidence. It could not be pointed out that any evidence has RSA No. 1254 of 2009 ( 2) been misread or not taken into consideration. Consequently, I do not find any patent illegality or material irregularity in the finding recorded or that the finding recorded gives rise to any substantial question of law in the present second appeal. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 21-07-2009 ds