IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9193 of 2006 Chandrabali Singh, Son of Late Phulena Singh, resident of Village and P.O. Kala Dumra, P.S. G.B.Nagar, District-Siwan ----------------------------- Petitioner Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board, through the Secretary, Vidyut Bhawan,Patna 2. The Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road,Patna 3. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 4. The General Manager-cum- Chief Engineer, Tirhut Division, Bihar State Electricity Board, at Muzaffarpur 5. The Electricity Superintending Engineer, Chapra 6. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Siwan ----------------------- Respondents. ----------- 02 18-03-2011 Heard Sri Mukesh Kant, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Dharmesh Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent no.1 to 6/ Bihar State Electricity Board. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 31.1.2006 as S.B.O. (Super Selection Grade), Bihar State Electricity Board, has prayed for directing the Respondents to make payment of (i) Gratuity (ii) Leave Encashment (iii) Interest on Group Scheme and General Provident Fund delayed payment (iv) C.D.A. arrear of Rs.15, 764/- (v) Overtime dues for the period November 1996 to January, 2006 and (vi) Arrears of pension from February to April, 2006. In this case, a counter affidavit was filed on behalf of Respondent/ Bihar State Electricity Board, wherein it has been stated that almost all the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. However, nothing has been stated in respect of 2 Overtime dues and arrears of pension from February to April 2006. With consent of the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the Respondent no.3, i.e. the Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna so far as claim of the petitioner in respect of Overtime due and arrears of pension are concerned . The representation may be filed within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, Respondent no.3 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing all the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. In case of refusal also, Respondent no.3 is directed to pass speaking order within the aforesaid time. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of . NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)