IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2135 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: January 27, 2011. J.K.Jain ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus Nalwa Sons Investments Ltd. (formerly known as Jindal Strips Ltd.) and others. ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. None for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside impugned order dated 15.02.2010 passed by learned Civil Judge(Junior Division), Hisar, Annexure P1. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record including the impugned order passed by learned trial Court. CR No.2135 of 2010 It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner- plaintiff that he has moved an application for summoning the original specimen signature card of petitioner, which is in possession of respondents No.1 to 3 as the same is required by him at the time of his evidence. His request was declined by learned trial Court on the plea that it is not mandatory for the Court to ask for the production of each and every relevant document. In view of the fact that documents sought to be produced in evidence by petitioner-plaintiff is allegedly in possession of respondents No.1 to 3 hence, they are directed to produce the same at the time of evidence of petitioner-plaintiff. The present revision petition is disposed of accordingly. However, it is made clear that nothing observed herein shall be construed to have any bearing on the decision of this case on merit by learned trial Court. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) January 27, 2011. JUDGE 'om' 2