IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 8820/2008 Decided on:9.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Sukh Ram. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Nemo. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No.1 and 2. Respondents No.3 already ex parte. Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.4. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No.4 to the post of Part Time Water Carrier in Government Primary School, Chamyon, Tehsil Sadar, District Bilaspur. The interview for the post of Part Time Water Carrier was held on 17.7.2002. Petitioner has participated in the selection 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 process. The suitability of the petitioner and respondent No.4 has been gone into by the duly constituted Selection Committee. Petitioner has secured 12 marks and respondent No.7 has secured 25 marks. Since the suitability of the candidates has been adjudged by the duly constituted Selection Committee, this Court will not sit in appeal over the same. No mala fides have been alleged against the members of the Selection Committee. 2. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 9.12.2010 *awasthi*