THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITIONS No. 15338 and 15595 of 2003 COMMON ORDER: Both these Writ Petitions can be decided together as they raise identical questions. The writ petitioners have claimed regularization of service based upon the policy decision taken by the State Government and announced through their G.O.Ms.No. 212, Finance and Planning Department, dated 22nd April 1994. The assertion of the petitioners is that they have complied with and satisfied all the terms and conditions stipulated therein. On the ground that the matter was receiving the attention of the Supreme Court, the respondents have not taken any final decision in the matter. However, the issue has now been settled by the Supreme Court in A. Manjula Bhashini v. Managing Director, A.P. Women’s Co-operative Finance Corporation Limited[1]. In view of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in A. Manjula Bhashini’s case (cited supra), the present Writ Petitions are allowed. The writ petitioners will take necessary follow up action as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within three months from today. No costs. ---------------------------------- (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 11th November 2009 ksld [1] 2009(5) ALD 58 (SC)