: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1643 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.1542 OF 2004 M/s.Ravi Industries Pvt.Ltd. ....Plaintiff V/s. M/s.Amar Enterprises & Ors. ....Defendants Mr.Kirit Mody i/b M/s.Haridas & Co. for the Plaintiff. Mr.H. Toor i/b Chitnis & Co. for Defendant Nos.1 to 3, 5, 7 and 9 in support of the Chamber Summons. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 10TH MARCH, 2008. P.C. : 1. This is an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure on the ground that the suit is barred by limitation as well as on the ground that this Court has no territorial jurisdiction. 2. Prayer (a) of the plaint seeks a declaration that the termination of the agreement dated 2.4.1985 is valid. Prayer (b) seeks possession of the suit property which is land situated at Thane. 3. The suit agreement was terminated by a letter : 2 : dated 28.4.2000. By the said letter, the Plaintiff gave the Defendants seven days time for complying with its objections failing which it was stated that the agreement would stand terminated without further reference. However, as stated above prayer (b) is for possession of the suit land. In the circumstances, it would not be appropriate to decide the question in a summary manner. The point must be decided at the final hearing of the suit. 4. As far as the objection on the ground of jurisdiction is concerned, it must be noted that in paragraph 14 of the plaint, it is stated that the Defendants reside and carrying on business at Bombay and that the agreement was executed and terminated at Bombay. Thus even if the property is situated outside Bombay, this Court would have jurisdiction in view of Clause XII of the Letters Patent Appeal. 5. In the circumstances, the Chamber Summons is dismissed.