IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13776 of 2010 1. PUPLAL GANJU, SON OF KAILASH GANJU, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-RAJGURU, P.S. JORI, DISTT-CHATRA. 2. RAMJATAN YADAV, SON OF KEDAR YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-KAHUDAG, P.S. BARACHATTI, DISTT-GAYA. 3. CHATHU GANJU, SON OF INDRA MANI GANJU, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BARAUDHI, P.S. BARACHATTI, DISTT-GAYA. --PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 2 13.05.2010 Heard Mr. S. Jamil Akhter, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. Nityanand Tiwary, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. Petitioners are named accused in this case after being apprehended by the Police who conducted raid on some confidential information regarding planning of extremists group for gang war. There was exchange of firing. There is none reportedly injured. During search operation the Police party could see three persons making attempt to escape. They were asked to surrender, in obedience of direction petitioners, without any protest, got themselves surrendered and disclosed, on query, the names of other accused persons. Police recovered some incriminating articles. It is contended 2 that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent and there is no specific allegation against them. So far criminal antecedent is concerned, that is to be verified. Considering the facts and circumstances and response of the petitioners to surrender without any protest and nothing was recovered from their possession, they are ordered to be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the trial court ( Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya) in Barachatti P.S. Case no. 254 of 2009, subject to verification by the court below regarding their criminal antecedent. If submission is true then with additional condition to attend the trial court on each and every dates at least for one year or till the disposal of the case, whichever is earlier. In case the petitioners fails to attend on two consecutive dates, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad