IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 221 OF 2010 M/S. SIGMA INVESTMENTS AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus THE MAPUSA URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK OF GOA LTD ... Respondent Mr. Anthony D'Silva,Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. J.P. Mulgaonkar,Advocate for the Respondent. Coram:- A. S. OKA & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 9th August, 2010 P.C: The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent states that no bidder came forward when the auction was to be held in terms of the impugned notice dated 3rd/4th July, 2009. We accept the said statement. 2. The only challenge in this petition is to the said notice of auction. The auction has not taken place. Hence, we need not entertain the petition. 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners submitted that the notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 was not served to the Petitioners. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent states that the notice was issued to the Petitioners. However, it is not necessary to enter into the said controversy. Hence, we keep the said issue open. 4. Subject to what is observed above the petition is disposed of. A. S. OKA, J. F. M. REIS, J. ap/-