THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.5220 of 2003 ORDER: Petitioners, who are ten in number, are residents of Ravulapalem Vilalge in East Godavari District. All of them are marginal farmers owning small extents of land in the village. The lands are irrigated by Mukteswaram Canal also known as ‘Vanapalli Canal’ passing through survey Nos.56, 67, 114, 223, 224 etc coming from North to South. On the southern side of the village, National Highway No.5 passes starting from survey Nos.261 to 265 and other survey numbers. National Highway was originally formed in the year 1965-66 crossing Mukteswaram canal at survey Nos.205 and 206 of Ravulapalem village. The grievance of petitioners is that there is no provision made for traffic underneath the bridge and formed without road at a distance of half-kilometer by forming a ramp. Therefore, they filed instant writ petition seeking a direction to respondents to form a road on the Eastern side of the Mukteswaram canal under the bridge of Ravulapalem in survey Nos.206 and 207 connecting two villages, i.e., Ravulapalem and Komarajulanka. Third respondent filed counter affidavit inter alia stating that M/s.SNC Lalavin International Inc., Canada, who is reputed consultant, gave a report that it is not possible to lay a road under the existing four-lane road as it is not technically feasible. It is also stated that the request of petitioners is considered and a new road underneath the four-lane highway is formed on Eastern side of Mukteswaram canal, access to National Highway for two villages will be cut off. The petitioners have not filed any reply affidavit denying counter averments. Therefore, it stands unrebutted that technically, forming of road underneath Mukteswaram canal on the Eastern side is not feasible. Even otherwise, in exercise of power of judicial review, this Court cannot adjudicate non-jurisprudential issues. Forming of roads and providing approach roads in villages are the matters of technical skill, which is left to the Executive. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 12.08.2009 pln