IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 870 of 2010 Date of decision : 21.10.2011 Kavinder Kapoor ...Petitioner Versus Surinder Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. B.S. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Niti Wadhawan, Advocate for the respondent. **** RANJIT SINGH J. I am bit surprised to notice that the complainant had approached this Court with the grievance against the order passed by the appellate court. The respondent was prosecuted for an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. During the pendency of the case, the petitioner had filed an application for amending the charge praying that the respondent be charged under Section 420 IPC. That prayer was declined. Now the respondent has been convicted for an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, which he has challenged before the appellate Court. The appellate Court had set aside the conviction and had remanded the case for re-trial after framing the charge under Section 420 IPC. What grievance the complainant can have against this, is really not understood. If anybody can have grievance of being put to re-trial or fresh trial etc., it would be accused persons, who ought to have been acquitted if charge framed was not proper or made out. The Criminal Revision No. 870 of 2010 -2- respondent has not made any grievance and so I am not inclined to interfere or to list the validity of the order directing his re-trial or fresh trial. Dismissed. October 21, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE