IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS ON THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.PACHHAPURE MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 22334 OF 2010 (MV) BETWEEN: SRI. PRADEEP S/O RAMACHANDRA PATIL AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: G.I.T. MESS MANAGEMENT R/O: HOUSE NO.80, SARAF COLONY, RPAD CROSS, TILAKWADI, BELGAUM-06 DIST: BELGAUM …APPELLANT (By Sri./Smt : SHARAD V MAGADUM, Adv.) AND: 1. DILWALSAR G KALLUR AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS R/O: YAKKUNDI, TQ: SAVADATTI DIST: BELGAUM 2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., CLUB ROAD, BELGAUM DIST: BELGAUM ... RESPONDENTS * * * * * This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, against the Judgement and Award dated: 21.12.2009 passed in MVC No.3530/2005 on the file of the II Additional District Judge & Addl. MACT, Belgaum. 2 Read: 1. Order dated 12.11.2010 which reads as: “Four weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections. If the Office objections are not complied within four weeks, the appeal stands automatically dismissed without further reference to the bench”. //COPY// This appeal coming on for orders on IA on this the 25.11.2021, the Hon’ble Court Ordered the following; ORDER XXX XXX XXX. XXX XXX XXX. 8. On overall consideration, award appears to be just and proper. There is no scope for enhancement. There is no good or sufficient cause for enhancement of compensation. Since claimant is not having a good case on merits, no useful purpose would be served by granting time to appellant to comply with office objections. I.A.No.1/2011 is rejected.. SD/ JUDGE. //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the Order Sheet dated 29.11.2021, vide order dated 25.11.2022 I.A.1/2011 is rejected. Hence, this MFA No.22334/2010 stands dismissed as per the Court Order dated 12.11.2010. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. R-By: vrs C-By: vrs T-By: nd