sk 1 rpw148.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE REVIEW PETITION NO.148 OF 2011 In WRIT PETITION NO.10757 OF 2011 Mr.Ajay Madhusudan Marathe : Petitioner V/s. Central Board of Film Certification & Ors. : Respondents ... Mr.Kiran Kulkarni i/b.Asim Sarode and Kulkarni & Associates for the petitioner. Mr.Sandesh Patil for respondent no.3. ... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 17, 2011. P.C.: Heard. 2. Mr.Kulkarni, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that though the petitioner withdrew the petition in order to move the Central Government, the petitioner may not be able to move the Central Government since there is no provision in section 6 which enables a party to move the Central Government. This contention is made without considering rule 32 of the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983, sk 2 rpw148.11 which provides for such a complaint and the law laid down in Everest Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Bombay v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (AIR 1966 SC 1449). In any case, the Review Petition has been moved without even moving the Central Government. 3. Review Petition is rejected. (S.A. BOBDE, J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)