IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 137 OF 2010 IN SUO MOTU WRIT PETITION NO. 2 OF 2007 CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PANAJI ... Applicant Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 44 ORS., ... Respondents Mrs. Norma Alvares, Amicus Curiae. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General, with Mr. M. Salkar, Additional Government Advocate, for respondent nos. 1, 3 to6. Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. D. Lawande, Advocate for respondent no. 2. Mr. A. F. Diniz,Advocate for respondent no. 7. Coram:- S. J. VAZIFDAR & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 17th March, 2010 P.c. Respondent no. 7 seeks time upto 31.10.2010 for the purpose of complying with clause (B)(8) of the Order dated 9/7/2008. The reason for the delay is, it is stated, on account of authorisation from the Pollution Control Board/respondent no.2. Mr. Nadkarni learned counsel appearing on behalf of Pollution Control Board/respondent no.2 stated that the application which has been recently moved by respondent no.7/Corporation of the City of Panaji shall be decided and the decision shall be communicated to respondent no. 7 on or before 30/4/2010. The said statement is accepted. In any event the time to comply with the said order by respondent no. 7 is extended by 6 more months from the date of communication of decision to respondent no. 2 granting approval. MCA is disposed off accordingly. S. J. VAZIFDAR, J. U. D. SALVI, J. vn