Criminal Misc. No. M-23158 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-23158 of 2011 Date of decision : 02.08.2011 Dilbagh Singh @ Bagga ....Petitioner V/s State of Punjab and others ....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. R.S. Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) In this petition preferred under section 482 Cr.P.C. it is prayed that direction be issued to the respondents to submit their report as directed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Amritsar vide order dated 09.06.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 09.06.2011, the court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Amritsar directed the SHO to submit a report regarding queries raised by his court. However, the concerned SHO failed to submit necessary report as directed by the Magistrate. He, thus, submits that a direction be issued to respondents in inherent jurisdiction of this court to submit report as directed by the trial court. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It is inexplicable as to how instant petition is maintainable before this court. Admittedly, the trial court is seized of the matter regarding application of release of vehicle of the petitioner on supardari. During the pendency of said application, the present petition has been Criminal Misc. No. M-23158 of 2011 2 moved before this court seeking interference in inherent jurisdiction. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out either any ground to invoke inherent jurisdiction or to show how this petition is maintainable. In my considered view the present petition is totally frivolous in nature and the same is hereby dismissed. August 02, 2011 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE