§§eiiiioner Respondenis ’1 ) 2) 3) (J? hesent: None for the oetitiohen Smt. Sunéta Jain, H§GH CGURT OF CHHA?TE$GARH: BILAS‘?$R W113 Petitien {$} No. 25$§ (bf ZQQ? LK. Sharma, Sm of Shri Chandrika Prasaci Sharma, aged abcut 65 years; Retired LectLtrer, i‘esédent of Baririhamuda, Ward No.14, Pendramad, Disirici Biiaspur (CG). Vea’sus Siate of Chhattisuarh, through the Secretary) Department 9f Triba! We!fare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur{CG). The Accountani General, Chhattisgam, Raipur (CG). The Assistant Commissicner. Triba} Devempment, B§iaspur {CG}. The Biock Educatiari Officer (Triba§ Wefare Degariment} Marwahi, D§strict, Bilaspur {CG}, The Principai, Govt Higher Secondary Schooi, Seam, Biook Maw/aw, District Biiaspur (CG). ( Writ Petition under Articée 226 of me Constétuiion of india) s3: Hoo’bie‘wir. Saiiso K; iixgm‘hom‘, J. Pane! Lawyer f3? the State. GRIM. $§§§ER g?as$ec£ on 30”; gay of AML 2mg) None appears nor any represenia‘tion is made on behaii of the petitioner. 2) i have perused the pieadings, documenis appended thereto and heard iearned counsei aopearing for the respondenteistare. in rhe interesr or“ gueiice, since ihe Committee of the Senior Gificers has been consriiuied to look after the grievance with regard io the payment of retirai dues of the retired empioyees, this matter is aiso referred to the Committee. 3) This Court, in the matter of WPNoéE642i'2OS4 (Baijnath Mandai Vs. The State of C'nhattisgarh & others) and other conhected meters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retriat dues ae the disputed question of facts ’ , ,Wt m“, }444 4 4t 44 444 were involved. The Committee was constituied by the State Government, pursuani to the order dated 19—06-2066 paseed in W.P.Nor196’r/2006 (Smt. Keja Bar Chandrakar Vs‘ State Government of C'nhattisgar'n and others), and order dated 13-3—2008 passed in M.C.Cr Nor 105 of 2008 (State of Chnattiegarn and others Vs. Baijnath Manda! and another). Thus) thts petition is squarety covered by the tudgment and order dated 31$ Ltanuary, 23(38 passed in WPNo. 4642/3334 (Bag‘nath Mandat (supra) ) as submitted by Seamed coonsei appeartng for the parties. 4) This petition is accordingiy disposed of in the same terms Le, the ottioe of the Advocate Generai is directed to send the caee to the Committee. within a period of t5 days. from the date of receipt of a copy of this oro’er, Thereafter. the Committee shaii issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concerned, withtn a further period of 15 days. The Committee shaii consider and pass order, in accordance with iaw, after affording proper opportunity of. hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may tiie additionai documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, incioding payment of retira‘r dues, it any, to the petitioner; be compieted within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- " 5‘ Satish K. Agniho‘tri 3i Judge Raju