1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7897 OF 2004 Smt. Sakhubai Appasaheb Ingale. .... ..... Petitioner. Versus Superintendent of Jail & Anr. ...... ..... Respondents. None present for the Petitioner. Mr. C. R. Sonawane, AGP, for the Respondents. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and J. H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 14TH OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: Since nobody appears for the petitioner, we would have dismissed the matter but while going through the petition we find that this petition is filed by a lady, who claims to be a widow of a person who was in service of respondent Nos.1 and 2 when he died in the year 1975. She claims pension and pensonary benefits of Shri Apparao Ramchandra Ingle. Counter has been filed in which it is stated that the petitioner could not substantiate that she was a widow of Shri Apparao Ramchandra Ingle. No document was produced. Even the service record with the respondents does not disclose anything about the relation of the said Apparao Ramchandra Ingle with the 2 petitioner. 2. In the circumstances, we dispose of this petition giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondents with proof like a succession certificate obtained from the competent court that she is the widow of Shri Apparao Ramchandra Ingle. If such a document is produced before the respondents, the respondents will decide the claim of the petitioner within four weeks after filing of the said proof. 3. With the above observations, this writ petition is disposed of. Rule discharged. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (J. H. BHATIA, J.)