#3? girGURa m: "“ Eu€ T? GARE: BQLASQJR ‘mvii Pe‘émcm £9. 2%?3 a? 2%5 uEQ Sm‘: As‘mta Kuiw aged abw€ 42 vea"s \“Adaw of ate $yrmne ‘Qxjuf ascwairaan - 37rznci$as bcvw’mcn‘ Lgnc‘r Sebowary $chaoi: - Tamnan Dis‘wici Eaigam, Versus c C‘) hhatt sga"1 a amur ’CG; The Chaiman, Regional Rural Bank, Head Gffice, Raigarh, D§stt Raigarh (CG). 1 pmaecier‘ Eés’rz. Raigarh {Chhattisgarh}. 4} The Bianch Manager, Regionai Rafa? Bank, Kama, Distt‘ Raigerh {Chhaii§sgarh). 01%.? PeLitIon under mcie 240L527 of {he Cmsumion of india‘ Sing§e Bench : Harf'me $hri Sa‘tSeh K. Aghihotri, J, Pygsgnt Mr A l\ raha§a Advggafe fgr Th1: wml‘hnrgm' W. Ajay maul“ Advecate eppears eh beraif of M: SK. Befiwe} $teed‘wg couwsa *“o. Lmwr 0f indiafreseonden“: No 1 Mr Anawd Dedwya Ach'ccwre appea s far the reeeendents Ne 2 em " §§$P§?€EE?§?$ he A: camawt Ganyai, gave nment o? lm Iv Va $9 1- iv mm Sac (Bow AW “are fox’ihe umie $RAL GREER {Passed on éhie EQth :iey of Febmary, 29%} With caesem of $eamed counsel aweamg for i’ne partEes, me mafter §s heami §inaliy. 2,: Th§s case pefiains t0 grievance of hen—grant 0f rema! dues. 3) Tms Ceurt, in the matier of WPN04842/2604 (Baijmth Mandai Vs. The Séaie of C‘mhathsgam & Diners) anal otner conrecced mat?ere, airemed ”e Commit‘:ee i0 consaaer ‘zhe mauer e? i’eixaa wee as ghe e‘spmed qaeszion 0f f C‘s wexe m awed. Wae Committee was eensi’ituied by ihe $tete Government pufeuani t6 i‘he efde? dated w-G5—2GO6 passed in WP.§\§0.1§611’20§8 (Smt. Keja Bai Cheadraka? Vs. Siate Gavemment 0‘? Chha&isga¥§1 and othez's}, aae‘ erder daied ’43—3—2658 ‘gassed in ?x,-§CC \ic 105 of EQGS {@ate of C; he’t sgauh em o f‘ers Vs bagnath mama} aud anather) Thua ms peutgen uareiv cwered by the gummem and erdef Gated 3? " ianuary'; 2&8 peeeed \' e $ \ m in WRNG. 4542/2604 (Baiinafn Manda} (suwa) ) as submi?‘zec§ by kamea’ caunsei awearing for the paities. 4) T%1is peiitian és accordinuiy a‘ispased 6f in the same terms La, the (affibe of i‘ne Advecate Genera: is ¢i¥ec€ed to send {he case i0 the CammEtee, W§fhin a neriod of ’i5 ciavs fram the date of receipt ef a copy of ihis oreer as we“ as a cepy a; i‘he peé§i§an from ihe pei§i§mer. Whige considermg me daim of ihe pemionei', the Commétiee sham issue neiéee ta ihe mt?‘ cememed and {espmdeme No.2 and? 4 nameiy ihe Chairman, Regime? Rum: Eank, Heaa‘ Gffiee, Raigarh, Distt. Raigag’h {CG} and the Branch Mamger, Regicmai Rarai Bank, Kama, Distt. Ra§garh {CG}, wiimn a fur‘éher neriad of i5 ’ days, i0 put fea‘ward iheir case. The Commiiéee shai§ cansider ami pass o‘rder, i'n accordance wi%h iaw‘ after affording prover oppcn‘unity ef heafing t0 the pei§iioneL The pe’etionef amt? the officefs cm‘acemed may f§§e addi‘iicnai decuments, §f necessary. The eniire exercise, inciuding payment of feeiyaz cages, if any, to the ee§tionen be comeieted Wiihin a period of four months irom the daie of receipt of a copy of ibis order. 5) ‘i’he ee‘iiiiorier shaii suppiy one compieie se‘: or” foe pe‘tiiion to the ‘t te ceensei ea weii as the couneei for Union or‘ indie for irans‘ferring i‘xe same to the Cemmii’iee. A in case of grievance with regard to non—payment cf pensionary dues, ir is € not necessary to eie a writ peiiiion befere "zhis Court direciiy. The, represeniationiappiication can be maved before the Pensien Cemmii‘iee as seated above. The Perision Commii‘ree shaii net refuse io entertain the represenration!e§3eiicaiion, if sa fiied direciiy. 7) Consequentiy, M.W.P.No.21 9e of 2985 aiso stancis eieposee of. ea." e.“w i Sd/— i Satish K. Agnihotri i Raiu ‘ Judge S