IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12061 of 2010 RAMESHWAR PRASAD GUPTA SON OF LALI PUNIT LAL GUPTA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BASANTPUR, P.O.- JAITPUR ESTATE, P.S. & BLOCK- PAROO, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE & LAND REFORMS, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 4. THE DISTRICT ACCOUNT OFFICER, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 5. THE ANCHAL ADHIKARI, CHEHRA KALA, ANCHAL, DISTRICT- VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 6. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 2 29.07.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31.05.2008 as Revenue Clerk under Cherakala Anchal, District- Vaishali, although the retiral dues have been paid, however the same still needs to be revised considering the grant of assured career progression (A.C.P.) from due date in the light of the Government decision contained in letter no. 7725 dated 9th September, 2008 as contained in Annexure-3. The aforesaid grievance of the petitioner has not been redressed despite representation as contained in Annexure-4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claim of the petitioner needs to be verified from the records. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner has - 2 - earlier represented the matter, however, for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.3 with copy of the respondent nos. 4, 5 & 6. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay. Upon consideration if the representation of the petitioner is allowed the authority concerned shall simultaneously issue necessary further orders so that the retiral dues payable to the petitioner may also be revised. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)