IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15967 of 2011 SRI SHANKAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 420, 468 and 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that the complainant has higher mark when the person lower mark has been appointed as block teacher. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the complainant was a Maulvi and he was not entitled to be appointed as primary teacher particularly against the female vacancy. It is also submitted that there is specific provision for filing objection and raising all grievances for irregularities in the appointment under the Bihar Primary Elementary Teacher (Employment and Service Conditions)Rule, 2006 and other accused person has been granted anticipatory bail by 2 this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 15421 of 2011. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 2425 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Katihar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)