IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 23RD JULY 2009 / 1ST SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 20617 of 2009(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHAFAF.M., AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.MOIDU.M, MACHINGAL HOUSE, VADAKKANGARA P.O., MANKADA VIA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.679 324. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU SRI.P.VENUGOPAL (1086/92) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.20617 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 23rd July,2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner, who has completed his Engineering Degree Course from a college affiliated to the University of Calicut, had written the 7th Semester Examination. Apparently, dissatisfied by the marks obtained in three papers, he had applied for revaluation. He is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the 7th Semester Examination. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioner in relation to the 7th Semester Examination, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of W.P ( C) No.20617 of 2009 2 receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.20617 of 2009 3 W.P ( C) No.20617 of 2009 4 (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.20617 of 2009 5 W.P ( C) No.20617 of 2009 6 (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.20617 of 2009 7 W.P ( C) No.20617 of 2009 8