: 1 : USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER OF SUMMONS NO. 764 OF 2010 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 853 OF 2010 Amit B. Mittal .. Plaintiff v/s. M/s. Ahlada Engineers Pvt. Ltd. .. Defendants ......... Mr. G.B. Kedia for the plaintiff Mr. Nishigandh Patil for the defendant (Applicant in CHS) ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 5th JULY, 2010. P.C. : 1. This Chamber Summons is taken out by the defendants for condonation of delay in filing Vakalatnama. Affidavit-in-reply is not filed however, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the plaintiff opposed the Chamber Summons on merits. 2. I have heard learned advocates on both sides. Perused the affidavit in support of the Chamber Summons. Reasons given in the affidavit in support for condonation of delay can be : 2 : accepted. Delay can be condoned. Hence, following order is passed. ORDER (i) Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ii) Defendants to pay to plaintiff costs of Rs.500/-. (iii) Cost to be paid within one week from today. (iv) Vakalatnama filed by the defendants be taken on record. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)