BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Second day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.12853 of 2011 1. M.NALLATHAMBI @ THANKAM 2 D.MUTHURAMAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 5 & 6 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TUTICORIN DISTRICT. ( CRIME NO.27 OF 2011 ) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. D.SARAVANAN Advocate For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : MR.K.SELVAKUMARASWAMI, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are accused Nos.5 and 6 in Cr.No.27 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offence under Sections 467, 468, 471 of IPC. Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioners are before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of the prosecution, the first accused is a power agent of the de facto complainant in respect of 68 cents of land. The power was executed on 26.10.2011 itself. But with a view to commit fraud upon the de facto complainant, the first accused in collusion with his family members and these accused, has created a sale deed in favour of these petitioners in respect of 13 ½ cents. This amount to land grabbing, according to the de facto complainant. 3. It is brought to the notice of the Court by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that earlier three petitions of this nature were filed for anticipatory bail by these petitioners. One petition was dismissed as not pressed. Other two petitions were dismissed on merits. Once again, these petitioners, have come up with this petition for anticipatory bail. 4. In my considered opinion, though an accused in a case has a right to approach this Court for anticipatory bail, the said way cannot be continued repeatedly. Though this Court has dismissed the earlier requests on merits, now, the petitioners have approached this Court for anticipatory bail. 5. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in this petition. Hence, this petition is dismissed. sd/- 02/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TUTICORIN DISTRICT. 2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1CC TO M/S.D.SARAVANAN, ADVOCATE SR : 37717 +1CC TO MR.A.K.BASKARAPANDIYAN, ADVOCATE SR : 37929 SR : 08.11.2011 : 1P/5C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12853 of 2011 Date :02/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/