:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1481 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1481 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1481 OF 2005 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 956 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO. 956 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO. 956 OF 2005 Vitthal Hari Hasole .. Applicant V/s Bapu Yesaba Narvekar & Ors. .. Respondents ----- Mr.V.B.Rajure for the Applicant. Mr.V.S.Kokitkar for Respondent No.1. Mr.M.V.Bandiwadekar for Respondent No.6. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J. DATE : 7TH JUNE, 2006. DATE : 7TH JUNE, 2006. DATE : 7TH JUNE, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant and Respondent Nos.1 and 6. Respondent Nos.2 to 5 though served have not appeared. The above appeal has already been admitted. For the reasons stated in the Civil Applciation, sufficient cause is made out. Hence, the Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)