IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH JANUARY 2011 / 29TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1828 of 2011(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- VAZHAPULLY MANISHA GANGADHARAN, HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER(POLITICAL SCIENCE) GOVERNMENT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER, MANJAPRA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN SMT.DHANYA CHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT,TRIVANDRUM-695001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SHANTHI NAGAR, TRIVANDRUM-695001. BY G.P. SMT. NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.1828 of 2011-C - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 19th day of January, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner is presently working as HSST (Political Science) at Government Higher Secondary School, Manjapra, Ernakulam District. This is a case where the posting of a Principal has resulted in some adjustments. The present complaint raised by the petitioner is that in spite of submitting her claim in terms of the guidelines Ext.P1 for the general transfer, while issuing the provisional list Ext.P6, the name of the petitioner has been omitted. 2. Ext.P5 is the initial application submitted by the petitioner in the form prescribed and the objections later submitted by her has been produced as Ext.P7. In the light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that unless directions are issued to consider the claims of the petitioner before finalising Ext.P6, the petitioner will be put to real hardship. 3. Therefore, there will be a direction to the second respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner also before finalising Ext.P6 which is said to be a provisional list. WPC 1828/2011 2 4. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/