WP(C) 2796/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. SARMA Heard Mr. BD Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.Ahmed, Standing Counsel, Irrigation for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner as projected in this writ petition is that he wa s entrusted with certain contractual works by the respondent authority i.e. the respondent No.4/the Executive Engineer, Kaliabar , Irrigation Department, Nagaon for necessary execution. Thereafter, in terms of the work order, the petitione r completed the works and submitted the bill. It is contended by the petitioner that a total amount of Rs.1,47,782/- is due to be paid by the respondents. It i s contended that in spite of repeated requests failed to evoke any response of t he respondent authorities and the aforesaid amount has not been paid to the peti tioner by the respondent authorities, he has approached this Court by filing thi s writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similar nature of cases as a gitated by the present petitioner have been dealt with by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of (Tamsher Ali & Others -vs.- State of Assam & others) repor ted in 2008(4) GLT 1. In view of the aforesaid submission and upon hearing learned counsel for the par ties, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the case of the petitioner shall be dealt with by the respondents in term of the directions and observations made in the case of Tamsher Ali (supra) and similar reliefs granted to the petitioners in the aforesaid case shall also be granted to the present p etitioner as entitled under the law and as per the ratio laid down in the case a bove referred. The directions and observations of the case referred above shall squarely applicable to the case of present petitioner. With the aforesaid directions this writ petition stands disposed of.