WP(C) 504/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA.. Heard Mr. B.D. Konwar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms R. Chakraborty, learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition has been taken up for disposal at the motion stage itself. The husband of the petitioner while was working as Laboratory Assistant in the Integrated Cattle Development Project (I.C.D.P) office under the responde nts, died in harness on 1.6.2005. The petitioner thereafter submitted a represen tation in 2005 and on 5.11.2010 along with the prescribed form before the respon dents for consideration of her appointment on compassionate ground. But the same has not yielded any result, she approached this Court by filing the instant wri t petition. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the guidelines formulated in Achyut Ranjan Das v. State of Assam & Ors reported in 2006 (4) GLT 674 and in Faziron N essa v. State of Assam & Ors, reported in 2010 (4) GLT 340 will govern the case. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of providing that while considering the case in the above manner, the respondents will follow the guidelines laid d own in Achyut Ranjan Das (supra) and Faziron Nessa (supra). Needless to say tha t the petitioner cannot claim consideration of her case against any particular p ost or service and the consideration will be strictly as per the parameters and yardsticks laid down in the guidelines. Writ petition is disposed of.