1 cria5392.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5392 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL ST. NO. 485 OF 2010 (The State of Maharashtra V/s. Vithal Rambhau Kavle & Ors.) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 27.04.2011 Mr. S.G. Nandedkar, A.P.P. for the applicant/State. Mr. P.C. Mayure h/f. Mr. S.G. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 6. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. This is an application preferred by the State for condonation of delay of 90 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Appeal. 2. Learned Counsel for the respondents opposed the present application vehemently and submitted that there no substance in the application and same is devoid of any merits and same be dismissed. 2 cria5392.10 3. Considering the contents of the application and rival submissions advanced by learned Counsel for the parties, it appears that the delay has been explained satisfactorily and it further appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Appeal is not willful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4. In the result, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) thereof and delay of 90 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Appeal stands condoned. Said appeal be registered and numbered, which be placed in due course for admission. The Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. [SHRIHARI P. DAVARE,J.] snk/2011/APR11/cria5392.10