IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13003 of 2011 1. MURAHU PAL S/O LATE SUNDAR PAL. 2. CHAUTHI PAL S/O MURAHU PAL. 3. LANGATU PAL S/O MURAHU PAL. 4. NANDLAL PAL S/O MURAHAU PAL. 5. BIGAU PAL S/O MURAHU PAL. 6. GOVINDA PAL @ RAM GOVIND PAL S/O SHIV NATH PAL. 7. BIPATU PAL S/O SHREE NATH PAL. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 09.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, informant and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 302, 34, 201 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The First Informant Report was lodged against unknown when the informant’s son went missing while grazing sheep. During investigation the name of the petitioners sprang up as they were seen in the company of the victim. It appears that during investigation the accusation was found false and final form was submitted which was accepted in 2010 but on protest the order of cognizance has been passed. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the informant that substantial evidences have been found against the petitioners. It is also submitted by Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned 2 counsel for the State that on perusing the materials on record and examining the witnesses on enquiry the cognizance order has been passed. Considering the suspicious nature of the accusation and the fact that the accusation was found false during investigation, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bhabhua, in connection with Complaint Case No. 171 of 2010 (Tr. No. 2044 of 2011) arising out of Adhaura P.S. Case No. 22 of 2001, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)