IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 17064 of 2008 Between: P. Samuel S/o. Pethuru R/o. 7B-5-6/5, Kummaraveddihi , Eluru, W.G. DIstrict. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, Prohibitiion and Excise, Eluru, West Godavari District. 2 The Superintendent, Prohibitiion and Excise, Eluru, West Godavari District. 3 The Circle Inspector, Prohibitiion and Excise, Eluru, West Godavari District. 4 J.V. Satyanarayana S/o. Padyaraj Eluru. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue order or orders or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in granting Bar Licence in favour of the 4th Respondent at the Premises Door No. 7B-4-6/7, belongs to Chanduluri Roopesh Kumar, Kummaraveedhi, Division VIII, Eluru, West Godavari District as illegal and contrary to the A.P. Excise (Grant of Licence of selling by Bar and Conditions of Licence) Rules 2005 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.L.ALI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) This is a public interest litigation. This petition was notiﬁed for hearing on 12-11-2008. As the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner was absent, in the interest of justice, hearing is adjourned to 19-11-2008 i.e., today. Even today, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner is absent. In the circumstances, the petition is dismissed for default with no order as to costs. _____________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ __________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 19th November, 2008. GRR