THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR C.R.P.No.2255 of 2007 Date: 19.01.2011 Between: Y. Balagangadhar tilak … Petitioner AND Arvapalli Venkatarangam & Sons and 13 others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR C.R.P.No.2255 of 2007 ORDER: There is no representation for the revision petitioner. The learned counsel for the respondents 2 to 11 claimed that the execution petition from which the revision arose was terminated and that the revision, therefore, has become infructuous. 2. The respondents 2 to 11 are the decree holders. They laid the execution petition for the arrest of the judgment debtor No.3. The execution Court ordered the arrest of the judgment debtor No.3 through the impugned order. Assailing the same, the present revision is laid. 3. If the entire decretal amount was paid and the very execution petition stood terminated, the question of arresting the judgment debtor No.3-revision petitioner would not arise. This revision consequently becomes infructuous. 4. This civil revision petition, accordingly, is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _______________ K.G. SHANKAR, J Date: 19.01.2011 Isn