IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.18602 of 2011 Date of decision : 3.10.2011 Krishan Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Arvind Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioner impugns the order of the Financial Commissioner, Haryana dated 3.5.2011 vide which the matter regarding appointment of a Lambardar and the consideration preceding the exercise has been directed to be held afresh by remitting the matter to the Collector. The petitioner makes a grievance of the order by saying that the controversy has been confined to only two candidates and the merits of the other candidates are not being considered, which grievance is seemingly misplaced as the Financial Commissioner has very clearly observed in the impugned order that the case of petitioner Krishan Kumar and Shyam Lal would be considered upon their presenting the claim before the Collector. In view of the aforesaid, I am of the opinion that the extra- ordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of C.W.P.No.18602 of 2011 -2- India cannot be exercised in favour of the petitioner as his grievance regarding his being not considered is unfounded. Dismissed. 3.10.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss