IEMIna ? "'•'PES-S /,?' .^'^^n!;i s'" S'^A,=.:: ^iWB 8 //r/ ^^iianii^ "-• d-;;-- cf^ / IN THE HIGH COURT_QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.&MS€ / 2006 PETITIONER (^^ tf ^•^M^^'' '^fS^V>^'" ^c^ sfsf- Manharan Lal Kumbhkar, Son of Shri Tulsirain Kunibhkar, Aged about 44 years, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Girls Primaiy School, Kera, R/o. Vmage 85 Post Kera, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS /" 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretaiy, Department of Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). ^4. ^2. Director of PubUc Instruction, Raipur (C.G.). ^ rP^'". ^'^~e ^ ^3. The District Education Officer, '^y ^.rz^ G' ^ „. . . . . ^' District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). /,4. The Block Education Officer, Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). ^ ^»- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/^27: OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA_ FQR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IK NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY OR AN^O_TH_ER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE XI-HC-22 3iI^?T?ff f^TOsn^T gmR;Hf?(T Raju :iW- fe"'^ ^ 'tfe ^- 3S? "!4|i|lfl^, »Tnu'ls,Rldiyy ^^.lk.^?i. mT-—'•—•'••—••^' 200(, inW(TShHI<0 (d'b^, sn^r CTtiTW (rfi<T 25/11/aS06 , Shri AswaniShukla, COL|I Shri Satish Gupta, respondents/State. Heard. It is not disputed by t( Adminisfrative Tribunal in Origi| 24/08/1992 has reached its fin| Having considered argu) for both the parties and withoi of the case, it is directed th^ represenfation alongwith cop] within a period of one morith| No.2,shall decide that represel a period of thirty days from i\ after considerina alt the poir impact of the order passed Originai Application No.2745./' With the aforesaid dired +l-silfl41-< WRTt' ft' toA (RRSR: ^;3T|^IT31I^T sei for the petitioner. sputy Govt. Advocate for the ;e State that the order passed by id Application No. 2745/1989 dated dity. nents advanced by learned counsel t expressing any opini'on on the merit 3t petitioner may submit a detailed of this petition to Respondent No.^ from today and in turn Respondent itation in an objective manner within e date of receipt of representation ts raised by the petitioner and t'ne sy the Tribunal dated 24/08/1992 in ?89. on, the petition stands dispps^d of.. Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge (ift^y^) ^v^