HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.4795 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.03.2011 **** Paramjit Singh . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. CM Munjal, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner is aggrieved by the report dated 22.02.2011 (Annexure P4) said to have been submitted by respondent No.6 pertaining to the FIR No.53 dated 18.11.2010 under Sections 302, 307, 323, 34 IPC read with Sections 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act registered at Police Station Lakho Ke Behram, District Ferozepur. The petitioner contends that the above-stated enquiry report runs contrary to the directives issued by the DGP, Punjab vide memo dated 14.01.2009 (Annexure P6). (2). The petitioner has already submitted a representation/objections against the above-stated enquiry report on 07.03.2011 (Annexure P7). In these circumstances and without expressing any views on the - 2 – allegations/counter-allegations, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the petitioner’s objections against the above-stated enquiry report and take appropriate action in the matter as may be required in law. (3). Till the petitioner’s objections are decided by respondent No.2, no action pursuant to order dated 22.02.2011 shall be taken. (4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 17.03.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge