IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Rev. No.92 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : MAY 03, 2010 PALE RAM ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Jagjeet Beniwal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to show that the trial court has not taken into account any material piece of evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further not been able to show perverse reading of evidence. In such circumstances, no ground for interference in this revision against judgment of acquittal is made out. The petition is dismissed. May 03, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?