IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2010 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 36341 of 2010(P) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SHAMLA SULAIMAN, W/O. SULAIMAN, C.C.5/1363 PUTHIA ROAD, MATTANCHERRY. BY ADV. SMT.P.M.SWAYAM PRABHA SRI.ANIL KUMAR M.SIVARAMAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, FORT KOCHI-1. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, MATTANCHERRY-682002. 3. NABEESA MUHAMMED, C.C.5/1360 KUDAKUTHUMPARAMBA, MATTANCHERRY-682002. R1 & R2 BY GOVT PLEADER SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 36341 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 6th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Although inaction on the part of the 1st respondent on Exts.P2 and P3 led the petitioner to file this writ petition, essentially the complaint is that the 3rd respodnent has demolished a compound wall, constructed a new one and as a result thereof, the light and air to the petitioner's residence is blocked. 2. In my view, the allegations taken at its face value discloses a case involving civil rights and therefore the remedy of which also lies to the Civil Court. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp