-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIE PETITION NO. 39 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 460 OF 1998 U.R. Acharya and another ... Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents Mr. R.M. Nakhwa, instructed by Mr. Vasant Dhawan, for the petitioners. Ms. Geeta Shastri, AGP, for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. K.N. Gaikwad for respondent No.4. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & A.A . SAYED , JJ. DATE: MAY 05, 2009 P.C. Mr. Gaikwad, learned counsel for respondent no.4, on the basis of instructions received by him from Mr. Badhan, Ward Inspector of the Assessment Department, “A” Ward, who is present in Court, states that now nothing is required to be recovered from the petitioners in any manner as all the dues are recovered. In view of the fact that the petitioners have paid the entire amount as per the order passed by the Division Bench in the Writ Petition and in view of the above statement of learned counsel for respondent No.4, the learned counsel for the petitioners does not press this review petition and wants to withdraw the same. In view of the above, review petition is disposed of as -2- withdrawn. The learned counsel for respondent No.4 states that the provisional receipt given to the petitioners shall be treated as final receipt. P.B. MAJMUDAR, J. A.A. SAYED, J.