THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 22166 of 2010 Oral order: The petitioner states that respondent Nos. 1 to 3 have no jurisdiction to investigate into the FIR, registered for offences under the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, 1976, and that the authority constituted thereunder, has to investigate, and hence, he contends that the action of respondent No.1 in investigating into the FIR and filing charge sheet for the offences under Sections 120-B, 406, 420, 468 and 471 r/w Section 23 of the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, 1976, before the Court of II Additional Munisf Magistrate, Ongole, is illegal and without jurisdiction. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner an the learned Government Pleader for Home for the official respondents. If according to the petitioner, respondent No.1 has no jurisdiction to investigate into the FIR registered for the offences under the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, 1876, he is at liberty to take such a plea during the course of trial and arguments of the C.C., but after filing the charge sheet in the case, it is not proper for this Court under article 226 of the Constitution of India, to quash the C.C. proceedings, particularly when some of the offences, into which respondent No.1 made investigation and filed charge sheet, relate to offences under the Indian Penal Code, under which respondent No.1 has jurisdiction. For the foregoing reasons, I find no reason to quash the impugned C.C. proceedings. The writ petition is devoid of merit, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No cots. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 06th September, 2010 KSR/IBL