1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 122 OF 2010 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 262 OF 2010 Mr.Gajanan B. Worlikar ... Appellant v/s Municipal Corpn. Of Gr. Mumbai ... Respondent Mr.A.M.Sarogi for the appellant. Mr.J.J.Xavier for the Corporation. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 25TH MARCH, 2010 P.C.: 1. The appeal is preferred against the decision of the Trial Court in L.C. Suit No.235 of 2007. Admittedly, a notice under Section 354-A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act was issued to the appellant. Undisputedly, there is no allegation against the appellant that after the stop work notice was issued, he continued to carry out the work on the structure. A certain part of the work had already been completed by the time the notice under Section 354-A was 2 issued to the appellant. 2. In my opinion, the appeal need not be admitted. However, in case the Corporation issues a notice under Section 351 to the appellant for alleged unauthorized construction, the appellant will not be prejudiced by any observations or findings of the Trial Court in the present decree. 3. First appeal stands dismissed along with the civil application. ..... 3