IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 12TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 23RD MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 5064 of 2008(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SUSEELA.E.S., D/O.SIVARAMAN, AGED 45 YEARS, HEAD MISTRESS, P.M.S.A.L.P.SCHOOL, MUTHUPRAMABA, P.O.KIZHISEERI, KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, RESIDING AT HARIPRIYA, MUTHUPRAMABA P.O., KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.LATHA PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KIZHISSERI. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.5064 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of February, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner was originally promoted as Headmistress on 3.12.1986. Later on she was reverted on the ground that she did not have test qualification. Subsequently after obtaining test qualification, she was again promoted with effect from 23.5.1989. Her request for retrospective approval as Headmistress with effect from 3.12.1986 has been rejected. Her revision before the 1st respondent did not succeed. Therefore she has filed Ext.P7 review petition under Rule 93 of Chapter XIVA of the Kerala Education Rules. The petitioner now seeks expeditious disposal of Ext.P7. 2. I have heard the learned Government pleader also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there would be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P7 review petition filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an W.P.(c) No.5064/08 2 opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with a certified copy of this judgment for compliance to the 1st respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd