AB 3170/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE A.C. UPADHYAY. Heard Ms S. Chakraborty, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. B. B. Gogoi, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. This is an application under Section 438 CrPC praying for granting pre-arrest ba il on behalf of the petitioner Md. Atiqur Rahman in connection with Hailakandi P S Case No.421/2011 under Section 120(B)/420/406/34 IPC and Section 3/7 of the Pr ize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. By producing the Case Diary, the learned Addl. PP apprised the Court regarding t he progress of the investigation of the case. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that he is only a shareholder of the unit and as a shareholder, he had no role to play in the affairs of the company and the allegation of misap propriation of money of the unit is not applicable in case of the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that as a share-holder of the u nit, he is ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case. He is also no t named in the FIR filed by the present petitioner. Considering the materials on record and submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the considered opinion that the petitioner can be exten ded privileges of pre-arrest bail in connection with the abovementioned police s tation case. Accordingly, the interim order dated 29.9.2011 is hereby made abso lute. Bail application stands disposed of.