IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.115 of 2010 1. DEO MUNI PRASAD S/O LATE MOHAN SHAH R/O VILL-NASRIGANJ DHUS, P.S- NASRIGANJ, DISTT- ROHTAS (SASARAM) VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ROHTAS, SASARAM 4. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (NAZARAT), ROHTAS, SASARAM 5. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VIKRAMGANJ SUB-DIVISION, SASARAM, ROHTAS 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, NASRIGANJ, ROHTAS ********* 2 13/05/2010 After some arguments, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the Court gives a direction that the petitioner should approach the appropriate authorities for his grievance. It is further submitted that although the petitioner has been working continuously on daily wages, he has not been paid salary since 2003. I am not inclined to consider the first prayer of the petitioner, however if the petitioner has not been paid his wages, then the concerned authorities i.e. the Block Development Officer, Nasriganj, Rohtas/Sub Divisional Officer, Vikramganj, Sasaram should ensure payment of the salary of the daily wages, for the period the petitioner has or is working as a daily wage employee. This application is thus disposed of. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)