IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2216 of 2009 HARENDRA SAH @ HARENDRA PRASAD SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 3.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The Court is not required to go into the argument and the points raised by the petitioner and the material which has been brought in the supplementary affidavit filed by him today. The fact stands that there was a criminal case under section 7 of the E.C. Act instituted against the petitioner and 2001 Control Order governing the issue does envisage that pendency of criminal case will come in the way of revocation of suspension after expiry of 90 days. There are reasons therefore not to revoke the suspension of the P.D.S. license of the petitioner. No contempt is made out. The application is dismissed. If the petitioner is not satisfied with such provision and enactment he may have freedom to challenge the same in an appropriate writ. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)