IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3055 of 2011 RAJU YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 14.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that there was some differences between the informant and his wife and informant’s wife, namely, Smt Soni Devi filed a complaint case bearing Complaint case no. 2086/2010 against her husband as well as other in- laws and she left her matrimonial home. He further submits that taking the advantage of aforesaid incident, informant brought this false case against the petitioner and other accused on account of previous enmity which is admitted in the first information report itself. It is further pointed out by him that subsequently, informant and his wife revived their matrimonial dispute and thereafter the informant’s wife made tutored statement under section 164 of the Cr. P .C. Although learned counsel for the informant refuted the above stated submissions but considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, let petitioner Raju Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Gaya Sadar Mofussil P.S. Case no. 113 of 2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)