1 wp1897.10 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1897 OF 2010 Usman @ Abdul Gani Shaikh. ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent. None for petitioner. Mr. J.P.Yagnik, APP for State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATED:- OCTOBER 8, 2010. P.C. 1. The appointed advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Dhoptkar is absent. With the assistance of learned APP, we have perused the record. The reasons for not releasing the Petitioner on furlough leave is that proposed surety does not have permanent address. In such a situation, the question of releasing convicts does not arise. So long as the Petitioner does not offer solvent surety, the request for releasing on furlough leave ought not be entertained. As and when the Petitioner is in a position to offer solvent surety, his request be considered on its own merits in accordance with law. Petition disposed of on the above terms. 2 wp1897.10 2. Copy of this order be forwarded to the Registrar(Judicial) to take appropriate measures for the absence of appointed advocate. (P.D.KODE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)