IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2858 of 2009 SUJIT KUMAR @ SUJEET KUMAR CHAUDHARY son of Sri Nandan Chaudhary, resident of village Singhpur, P.S.Bihpur,District Bhojpur … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri Arjun Pd. No.1 For the State:Shri Dashrath Mehta, APP ----------- 2. 22.1.2009 Heard. The renewal prayer has been made by the petitioner on the ground that two witnesses to seizure on being examined in the trial vide Trial No. 1 of 2008 arising out of Official Complaint case No. VIII(10)/50 CUS/BTH/07-2008/193 have not supported the fact that any seizure was made in their presence or that they had witnessed and accordingly signed the document. I am not influenced much by the argument because the witness to the seizure could not be expected to depose about the conduct of search and seizure. The official witness, like, the complainant and other employees of the department were accompanying him on the date of occurrence who witnesses the whole incident and are witnesses to the search and 2 seizure. The petition is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)