IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4875 of 2011 VINAY SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 10.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 22.07.2010 in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 479,471, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, Section 8/16 of the N.D.P.S. Act, Sections 27(b)(ii),27(d),28, 28(A) and Section 27(C) of the Drugs and Cosmetic Act. It is alleged against the petitioner that on Rickshaw spurious drugs were being carried and the petitioner was following the Rickshaw. Subsequently the house of the petitioner was raided and spurious drugs were recovered and in the same transaction on recovery of arms, a separate case was also registered. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was working in the Manglam Firm and the petitioner is not involved in any other case except two cases and the charge 2 sheet has been submitted in the case. The petitioner undertakes to file undertaking on affidavit that he will appear regularly before the trial court. It is submitted that the drugs were being spurious drugs and no analysis report has been obtained. Considering the undertaking, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Patna, in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 329 of 2010. Learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner defaults for three consecutive occasions during trial. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)