R.A. No. 332 of 2011 (O&M) in -1- CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 17298 OF 1995 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: September 2 , 2011. Parties Name Janta Steel and Metal Co-operative Industrial Society Ltd. , Faridabad ...PETITIONER-APPLICANT. VERSUS The State of Haryana and others. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg PRESENT: Mr. R.S.Rai, Sr. Adv., with Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate, for the petitioner Jasbir Singh, J. (oral) Order. This application has been filed with a prayer to review an order dated May 18, 2011. After passing of the said order, the applicant had gone to Hon'ble the Supreme Court and got their appeal dismissed as withdrawn with a view to seek review of the order before this Court. This application has been filed by stating that a wrong finding has been given by observing that vide documents Annexures P-12 and P- R.A. No. 332 of 2011 (O&M) in -2- CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 17298 OF 1995 13, the land which was released to some of the land owners was not part of the notifications under challenge. Be that as it may, even if that plea is accepted to be correct, it will not change the position so far as merits of the case are concerned. It is an admitted fact that the total land owned by the petitioner – applicant is 68 Kanals 12 Marlas, out of which only 39 Kanals 19 Marlas was acquired. It obviously means that the land where industrial unit is in existence was not made subject matter of acquisition. It has also been found as a matter of fact in the order dated May 18, 2011, that the applicant – petitioner had failed to show that there was any construction in existence in the land under acquisition and furthermore, it was also noticed that counsel, who represented the applicant at the time of arguments, had failed to show any case of discrimination. The facts, which were argued, were noticed and finding was given. This application has now been filed through an Advocate, who was not a counsel for the applicant at the time of passing an order, now sought to be reviewed. No case is made out for interference. Dismissed. ( Jasbir Singh ) Judge (Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge September 2 , 2011 DKC