SBCWP NO.6215/04. 1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6215/2004. Rajeev Kumar Sharma Vs. Raj.Civil Service Appellate Tribunal & Ors. Date of Order : 18/8/2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Prahlad Singh for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sharma, Government Counsel for State. **** This writ petition is filed against the judgment of the Tribunal dated 2/8/2004 whereby appeal filed by the petitioner against the seniority list issued in January 2004 was dismissed. Tribunal dismissed the appeal because as per the stand taken by the respondents before the Tribunal, the District Education Officer had recommended to the Deputy Director for consideration of his representation dated 24/5/2004. Secondly, Tribunal also rejected the appeal on the ground that challenge to the seniority list issued in January 2004 could not be made beyond the period of 60 days. The appeal was filed on 28/6/2004 and it was not accompanied by any application for condonation of delay. Perusal of the reply submitted by the respondents, indicates that there was indeed a change in the seniority of the petitioner which according to them was the inter district transfer of the petitioner on his own request. This is disputed by the petitioner. SBCWP NO.6215/04. 2 Petitioner has however raised a grievance that so far, copy of the seniority list has not been supplied to him. Be that as it may, it is clear that there was indeed a change in his seniority and according to the respondents, it was owing to petitioner, whereas according to him, his juniors were promoted. Having regard to the facts aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents : (i) to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner by a speaking order within a period of one month from the date copy of this order is produced before them and (ii) furnish a copy of decision on such representation along with seniority list aforesaid to the petitioner. If eventually, petitioner is not satisfied with the order passed by the respondents on such representation, he would be at liberty to challenge the same along with seniority list before the Tribunal, which shall be decided by it on merits. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil/-