IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2011 / 12TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 4629 of 2011(C) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- SAJEEV A.B, PC NO.6216, ANDIKOTTU VEEDU, EDATHIRINJI P.O., TRICHUR 680 122. BY ADVS. SRI.C.P.SAJI SMT.P.DEEPTHI RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001. 2. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 004. R1 BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.4629 OF 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of March, 2011. J U D G M E N T Aggrieved by the show cause notice issued to the petitioner asking to show cause why the name of the petitioner should not be deleted from the ranked list, the petitioner has approached this Court after filing Exhibit P7 explanation. 2. The petitioner submitted an application for the post of Vocational Instructor (Live Stock Management), Category No.33/2005, pursuant to the Gazette Notification dated 26.04.2005. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he joined in the Police Department as a trainee on 27.01.2005 and had undergone training till 15.11.2005. Thereafter, he was appointed as Police Constable on probation from 15.05.2005 to 02.01.2008. It is during the period of training that the petitioner submitted the application for the new post. In the application, it was stated that he is in Government service. Normally, going by the W.P.(C) No.4629/2011 2 instructions given by the Public Service Commission, such an applicant who is in Government service shall produce a receipt from the Head of the Office in the form prescribed before sending application and shall produce the same to the 2nd respondent as and when called for. 4. The petitioner was invited to participate in the test conducted by the 2nd respondent with Register No.100186 and he passed the test and has been shortlisted also. Thereafter, he was interviewed and accordingly, his name finds a place in the rank list. 5. According to the petitioner, since he was only a Trainee, he produced Exhibit P4 No Objection Certificate from the Superintendent of Police, Thrissur. It is in this circumstance the petitioner contends that the proposal to remove his name from the ranked list cannot be supported. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the PSC. Evidently, Exhibit P6 is only a notice to which the petitioner has submitted Exhibit P7 explanation. In the light of the fact that final decision is yet to be taken, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent W.P.(C) No.4629/2011 3 to take a decision, after considering various points pointed out by the petitioner. The materials relied upon by the petitioner will be adverted to while taking the decision. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp