(L^ ^ ^) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS) N0. 392-2- /201irS.B.1 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^v..-- ^^s^ •--fa^.-'^ ^^>'!i y^.,;. '^•"" Kailash Kumar Baiga S/o Radhelal, aged about 35 years, Caste- Baiga, Working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-3, Govt. Primary School, Lodabore, Block- Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS : 1. -^Stateof Chhattisgarh Through :- the Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2. ' The Caste Scrutiny Committee, Pandit Ravishanker Vishvavidyalaya Parisar Raipur, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARSOF THE PETITIONERS As mentioned in the cause title above. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As mentioned in the cause title above. <3. PARTICULARS OF THE ORDER AGAINST WHICH ^' .^: is:£s?;=s^SN HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition fSI No. of2011 PETIT[ONER Kallash Kumar Balqa VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh and others Shri Rishi Rahul Soni, counsel for e petitioner. Shri Y. S. Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the State. WRIT permoN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CGNsrrruTiON OF INDEA \ (22.07.2011) Grievance of the petitioner is that though the Government authorlties are asking him to get hls caste certificate verified from the Hiah Power Caste Scrutiny Committee (for short 'the Committee') but the said Committee is neither issuing a requisite form to hlm nor is responding in any manner. Counsel for the petitloner submits that on the one hand the Committee is not entertainina the petitloner and on the other hand a threat is being given by the department to take disciplinary action against him. 2. Learned State counsel fairly submits that the Committee would entertain the case of the petitioner and pass an approprlate order in accordance with taw. He submits that the Committee witl also issue the requisite form in favour of the pstitioner if he approaehes the authorlty within the time 3. In view of the submission made by the counsel for the State, the petition is djsposed of with a direction to the ^ -•2-- petjtioner to approach the Commlttee wjtnin 15 days fro.m today and in turn the said Committee wlll issue requlsjte fo.rm to the petitioner which would be submitted by him within further a period of one week and thereafter the Committee shali examine the matter and pass an appropriate order within further period of five months. Needless to say that due co- operation shall be offered by the parties for early disposal of case by the Committee. Tlll next slx months, the department will not take any coercive step against the petitioner for not submitting the caste certificate issued by the Committee. Sd/- pritinker Diwakar Judge