IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1824 of 2010 Date of decision: 1st July, 2010 Amrit Bansal … Petitioner Versus M.L. Goyal and another … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Advocate for the respondents. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Present revision petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 11th March, 2010 (Annexure P-1) whereby the Rent Controller rejected the application preferred by the petitioner-tenant to amend the reply. When the application for amendment of the written statement was filed, the case was fixed for rebuttal evidence, if any, and arguments. Mr.Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate appearing for the petitioner, has read the proposed amendment in the written statement. He has laid emphasis on para 4 of the same, wherein it has been mentioned that “the petitioners have no locus-standi to file the ejectment petition as according to the deed of settlement duly registered in the office of Sub-Registrar, U.T. Chandigarh, the petitioners are not the landlords and owners of the respondent. … … … …” Civil Revision No.1824 of 2010 Learned counsel has submitted that it being a material fact, had escaped notice of the petitioner-tenant. To controvert this, Mr.Suvir Sehgal, Advocate appearing for the respondents has referred to the eviction petition wherein, in para 5, it has been specifically stated that a settlement deed was arrived at, but the same was not acted upon. Learned counsel has submitted that in view of this, the amendment as proposed cannot be allowed. At this stage, Mr. Sachdeva has submitted that he be permitted to place on record a photostat copy of the settlement deed. Counsel for the respondents has stated that in case a photostat copy of the settlement deed is placed on record, he will not object to its admissibility. In view of the broad consensus arrived at between the counsel for the parties, no further direction is called for in the present revision petition. The petitioner shall be permitted to place on record a photostat copy of the settlement deed and no objection shall be raised to the admissibility of the same. As agreed between the parties, the document shall be produced in the trial Court on the next date of hearing. With the observations made above, present revision petition is disposed of. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE July 1, 2010 rps 2