IN THE mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER ^y/ .s^y ^9v^" W.P.S.No. t'^^^ /2007 Chandresh Kumar Rathia, aged about 36 years, S/o Chamra Singh Rathia, e" {t'~ Working as L.D.T. Govt. Praiinary School galimar, block- Dharamjaigarh Dist- Raigarh ( C.G.) .-••''Q ->) / •" ry..-' >/^"./" •^' ..-•' VERSUS •^ y RESPONDENT: •A, rsr*T'I\?E: d.EXS A-G' (>£;?•(<ff 3. State ofCG. Through. Secretary, Tribalwelfare Dipartment, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur ( C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal welfare Department,pt R.SS. University Campus Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) Asst. Comnrissioner, Tribal welfare Department, Distt- Raigarh. ( C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF BNDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRLATE WRITS OF MANDA- MUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS :- aBaBaiaar"" ~~~MBBiiBBSBiMi HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTM, J. Petrtioner Chandresh Kumar Rathia, Versus ofChhattissarh & Othe.rs Present: Shri Amit Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Sfari Susnil Dubey, Govemment Advocate for the State / resoondents. (Passed on 9ra ofMarch, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits tb.at the Tsetitioner is workins as Lower Division Teacb.er. The petitioner obtained B.T.I. Examination certificate in the vear 1992. on his own expenses. 2. L.eamsd counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the question mvolved, herein aste whether the teacher, who obtained B.T.L Examination certificate 0.11 his own expenses, is entitled to two advance iBcrements. 3. According to leamed counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitlsd to two advance increments in view ofthe decision ofthis Court in the case of Yasl [xun.ar Bharadwaj Vs, 2 Municipai Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR- CG 96}, This Court in the case ofYashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and aBother (Supra), came to t!ie conciusion taat the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Certificate cn their own expenses, are covered by the cireular dated 24.12.98 issued by the State Govemment of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Leamed counse! for the petitioner &rther submits that the facts and questioa of iaw involved in the present case are squarely covered bv decision of this Court in ths case of Yashwant Kianar Bharadwaj Vs. Mxnricipal Corporafion, Din-g and mother (Supra), to counsel appearing for the respondents fairly concedes and agrees with fhe avemient made by learaed counsel appearing for the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms oftfae order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. MiHiicipal Corporation, Dta'g and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner B.T.I. Examination on his own exnenses as oer the circiilars dated 24.12,1998 & I .3.1' ler w! ie aas been oaid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit