mst FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1199 OF 2010 Ramchandra Amruta Borade and others Petitioners versus Santu Tukaram Borade and others Respondents Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Shriram S. Kulkarni for petitioners. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22nd February 2010 PC :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners are the judgement debtors. The challenge in this writ petition is to an order by which the respondents-decree holders have been permitted to correct name of the village appearing in the application at Exhibit-158 filed in execution application. Apart from the fact that there is no prejudice to the petitioners who are the judgement debtors, this is not a case where interference can be made in writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the constitution of India inasmuch as only an accidental error committed by the decree holders has been permitted to be corrected. The writ petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J.)