:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.42 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.3562 OF 2003 Futarmal Achalaji Shah ..Plaintiff. Vs. Ramdas S. Poonja & Anr. ..Defendants. Mr.Sohanraj Chopra, Advocate for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. DATED: 18TH JANUARY, 2005 DATED: 18TH JANUARY, 2005 DATED: 18TH JANUARY, 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : The suit is filed on a Bill of Exchange in the sum of Rs.2,20,000/- of which Defendant No.1 is the drawer and Defendant No.2 is the acceptor. A decree against Defendant No.1 has already been passed. 2. There is no reply to the Plaintiff’s Advocate’s notice on behalf of the Plaintiff demanding the amounts. No reply has been filed. There is no defence to the suit. 3. In the circumstances, the Summons for Judgment is made absolute with costs. :2: Refund of Court fees as per rules. For the purpose of refund, all parties including the Prothonotary and Senior Master to act on an ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate/Court Stenographer.