IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45249 of 2008 RUKHSANA KHATOON Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 15.1.2009 Heard. The petitioner Rukhsana Khatoon is the daughter in law of the deceased and is alleged to have come at his darwaja along with other accused persons and fired shot with Islam Ansari so as to killing Gudar Ansari. Contention was that there was litigation between the petitioner and her husband and the two had separated from each other. The contention further is that there were three injuries recorded by the doctor in his postmortem examination report out of which, two were communicating to each other indicating that those could be on account of one shot and the third was not the cause of death. By making reference to different paragraphs, it was contended that the petitioner might not have participated in the offence. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has drawn the attention of the court towards the statement recorded in paragraph 35 of the case diary of the husband of the petitioner, who directly alleges that the petitioner is the 2 assailant of the deceased. The facts indicate that it was Maoist attack at the deceased and the violence was an extremist violence. The participation of the petitioner is indicated sufficiently by the materials collected in the case diary and considering that, I am not inclined to direct release of the petitioner on bail. The petition is dismissed. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )