IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17190 of 2009 1. SAUDI MAHTO S/O SRI DOMAN MAHTO R/OVILL SANGTHIL, P.O. AMARATH, P.S.಄JAMUI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JAMUI 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE JAMUI 3. THE SUB- DIVISIONAL OFFICER JAMUI 4. THE OFFICER-IN- CHARGE JAMUI POLICE STATION, JAMUI 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT CUM CIRCLE OFFICER JAMUI ----------- 2/ 03/01/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the interveners. The matter relates to a prayer for reconsideration of certain decisions arrived at on basis of mutuality between the petitioners and the interveners at a sitting with the District Administration. The submission on behalf of the petitioner is that certain decisions based on mutuality require re-consideration. Any decision arrived at mutually can be re-considered only on basis of mutuality and not unilaterally. In that view of the matter, leave is sought to withdraw the application to represent before the District Magistrate for re-consideration. Needless to state that affected parties shall have to be heard before any re- consideration is done. The writ application stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid observations. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)