hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 603 OF 2010 Shri.Mohan S. Delkar ... Petitioner Versus Inspector of Police, Silvasa Police Station and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. A.P. Mundergi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.V. Marwadi i/by Mr. V.V. Katti for the Petitioner. Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Virendra Pethe, for the Intervenor in Cri. Application No. 109 of 2010. Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Special Counsel for Union Territory of Dadra, Nagar Haveli for R. Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Mandar Goswami for R.No. 4. Mrs. P.P. Shinde, A.P.P. for State. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 17TH AUGUST, 2010 P. C.: Heard Mr. Mundergi, the Ld. Senior Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani, the Ld. Sr. Counsel for the Intervenor. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the Petitioner prays for directions to transfer the investigation in C.R. No. 127/09, 221/09, 251/09, 252/09, 253/09, 299/09 and 314/09 registered with Silvasa Police station to the Central Bureau of Investigation. Mr. Dipak Purohit, Chief of Police in the Union Territory, Administration of Dadra and Nagar Haveli as well as Mr. Narendra Sigh Rathod, Police Sub Inspector attached to Silvasa Police Station have also filed affidavits in reply. In C.R. No. 126, 127, 221, 252, 252, 253 of 2009 investigation has been completed and chargesheets have been filed. In so far as C.R. No. 314 of 2009 is concerned, it has been stated in the affidavit of Mr. Rathod that the accused have been arresetd and in C.R. No. 299 of 2009 the accused were yet to be arrested. Thus investigation in C.R. No. 299 of 2009 and 314 of 2009 is in progress as at present. Admittedly the Petitioner is not a complainant in any of these cases and he is not even a witness on the basis of his statement recorded during the investigation. The Petitioner has lost the election as a Member of Parliament and he alleges that the returned candidate Shri. Nathubhai Patel is indulging in extortion through his supporters. The petitioner has admittedly challenged the election of Shri. Nathubhai Patel by filing an Election petition before this court. On the face of the affidavits filed by the I.O. as well as the Chief of Police in the Union Territory administration of Dadra and Nagar Haveli we are satisfied that there is no case made out to transfer the investigation or call upon to undertake further investigation to C.B.I. Hence, the petition fails and the same is hereby dismissed. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (B.H. MARLAPALLE,J.)