1 1. D.B. Special Appeal(Writ) No.1180/2008 State of Raj. & ors. V/s Ratan Lal 2. D.B. Special Appeal(Writ) No.1203/2008 State of Raj. & ors. V/s Mukesh Mudgal 3. D.B. Special Appeal(Writ) No.1204/2008 State of Raj. & ors. V/s Prem Singh Tanwar 4. D.B. Special Appeal(Writ) No.1518/2008 State of Raj. & ors. V/s Jagdish Prasad &. anr. 5. D.B. Special Appeal(Writ) No.1519/2008 State of Raj. & ors. V/s Narendra Singh & anr. 12.11.2008 Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Narayan Roy Hon'ble Mr.Justice Raghuvendra S.Rathore Mr.G.S.Gill, Addl.Advocate General for the appellants. Since all these appeals arise out of the common order they were heard together and are being disposed of by this order. Delay in filing these appeals is condoned. By the order impugned, the writ applications were disposed of with the directions to the respondent- authorities in the light of earlier order passed by the Principal Seat at Jodhpur in Civil Writ Petition No.1300/01 and analogous cases which was affirmed in special appeal, to consider the cases of the writ- petitioners either for absorption on equivalent posts under Rules of 1969 or to adjust them on preferential basis on the posts subsequently revived/sanctioned. The writ-petitioners had challenged order dated 7.6.2000 issued by the State of Rajasthan whereby and whereunder certain posts in the Department of Child Development were abolished. The contention of the writ-petitioners was that since they were working under the State of Rajasthan, they could not have been 2 left in lurch after abolition of the posts, rather their cases should have been considered for adjustment/absorption in some other departments. It appears further that by virtue of the interim order passed by the learned Single Judge, the writ petitioners continued to work and ultimately the writ applications were disposed of by the order impugned on 23.8.2007 with the directions as referred to above. The learned Single Judge of this Court placing reliance upon order passed by the main seat at Jodhpur, as referred to above, directed the State- authorities to apply the same yard stick in regard to the writ-petitioners and consider their cases for absorption/adjustment in different departments of the Government. The order passed by the learned Single Judge at the main seat at Jodhpur however was affirmed in special appeal vide order dated 11.12.2003. Nowhere it is stated in the memo of appeal or in reply in the writ application itself that the State of Rajasthan ever challenged the order passed by the Principal Seat at Jodhpur. The order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, in that view of the matter, was binding upon the State-authorities and they were required to comply with the same. From the impugned order, it would also be manifest that the learned Single Judge of this Court had given time frame of 30 days to consider the cases of the writ-petitioners for their absorption/ adjustment and it is not known to the court till now as to whether the order dated 23.8.2007 was complied with within time frame. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case and the order passed by the Principal Seat 3 at Jodhpur, in our view, no interference would be required. These appeals accordingly are without merit and they are dismissed. (Raghuvendra S.Rathore)J. (Narayan Roy)C.J. Parmar