IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.17274-M of 2010 Date of Decision:15.7.2010 Ram Mehar and another .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Amit Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Malik, A.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 states that no compromise has been effected between the parties. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No.2, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. 15.7.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE