IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 852 OF 2006 M/s. Parekh Holdings ... Petitioner V/s. The Municipal Commissioner ... Respondent of Greater Mumbai & 6 ors. Ms. Saira Mirzankar for the petitioner. Mr. S. Ajitkumar for respondent Nos. 1 to 7. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, : F.I. REBELLO, : F.I. REBELLO, ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 05th April, 2006 : 05th April, 2006 : 05th April, 2006 P.C. . The reply filed by the respondent - Corporation at para 7 sets out that the petitioners have been called upon to carry out joint physical demarcation at site with C.S.L.R., S.E. (Survey), S.E. (B.P.) and A.E. (Estates) along with the other ward maintenance staff so as to avoid any further dispute. 2. The petitioner to inform C.S.L.R. and on such request being made, C.S.L.R. to complete the survey within one month from today. The petitioners to intimate the concerned parties including respondent No. 1 the date when the survey is fixed and the survey is completed. The respondent No. 1 to proceed according to law. ( 2 ) 2. Rule made absolute with no order as to costs. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]