IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9057 of 2010 1. PACHIYA DEVI 2. RAJAN RAJBANSHI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 15.03.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioners are mother-in-law and dever. They seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 304B/201 of Indian Penal Code. Petitioners are named in the F.I.R.. It appears from the F.I.R. that within six years of marriage, she was done to death in the matrimonial home in a very suspicious circumstance. There is specific allegation that the sasural people used to bodily torture her on account of the fact that she was unable to deliver child. Learned counsel submitted that the husband and father-in-law have been granted regular bail. Learned A.P.P. while opposing the prayer submitted that in course of investigation, the witnesses have supported the prosecution case. This court is not persuaded to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Prayer is accordingly rejected. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )