1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.297 OF 2005 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1119 OF 1999 Smt.Sheroo Soli Canteenwala & anr...Applicants. Vs. Sou.Sneha Prem Malhotra & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Amol Mhatre h/f Ms.Suhasini Mutalik for the Applicants. Mr.Yogesh Adhia for Respondent No.6. .... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. 10th March, 2005. P.C. : In the order dated 11th April, 2002 the last two sentences of the order are as follows: "Appellant No.1 has expired and it has been stated that Appellant No.2 is the daughter and sole heir of the First Appellant. In these circumstances, leave to delete the name of the 2 First Respondent." It is ex-facie apparent that the words "First Respondent" in the last sentence are an inadvertent error. Reference must be to the First Appellant. In the circumstances, the last sentence of the order shall be corrected as follows : "In these circumstances, leave to delete the name of the First Appellant." The name of the First Respondent shall be reinserted. The Civil Application is disposed of.