IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15362 of 2009 JAI SHANKAR SINGH, son of Sri Nayan Singh, resident of village-Pakhreda, P.S.-Pachrukhi, District-Siwan ----------------------Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Meera Devi, wife of Jai Shankar Singh, daughter of Nathuni Singh, resident of village-Bhopatpur, P.S.-Jamo Bazar, District-Siwan------Opp. Parties. ----------- 2. 4.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that family members of the complainant, i.e., father, mother and brother are pressurizing the petitioner to reside with them, while complainant’s brother brakes out from the jail and police is behind him to re-arrest. So, petitioner is not intending to remain with them and for that only to pressurize this complaint petition is filed. But I find no substance in the submission. Petitioner is the husband and is not standing on the footing of other family members who have been allowed bail. Petitioner is solely responsible for the affairs of the wife. I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail. As such, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )