IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9889 of 2008. Decided on: 27.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Harish Chander Katoch. … Petitioner. Versus H.R.T.C. and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): It has come in the reply that the case of the petitioner is under active consideration with other similarly situate persons. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Managing Director of the respondent-Corporation to take a final decision in the matter, as undertaken in the reply, within a period of ten weeks after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 27, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?