IV./ »1» &Sf^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH ^-^ / W.P.(S) No 2010 PETITJONER Ashlesha V. Misar D/o Shri V. B. Misar, Aged about 48 years, Occupation - Principal Govt. H. Secondary School Kurud Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS \^.--';<7P"' v>^1^ ^A'A.--^ 4-'o'V-\yvv'" ^'' ^'^'s>>" ^ro^^''' ^y. ''^-- 1: State ofChhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 'ysi •^W\v\ti, »fll'y<is. fawwy 3'ni^r TRR? ^.M^-^^.M.a^i6p1 Hmw vhWdn ' • -^••—-••^-^ fN^sr' sii^r^r Pt-ii.* SII^t aii ^rfta /' / ai^iTOnw^to ':hi<l[<n*)1f iTFRTf ^ '^T3t if^l^f-t ^?3iPa*t3i^( 8B : HON*BLE MR. JU8TICB PmTdNKER DIWAKBR )S.12.2010 Shri Vipin Tiwari, counsel for th^ petitioner. : Shri Ajit Singh, P.L. for the Stat^. Counsel for the petitioner su|bmits that the petitioner is lentitled to. benefit of two advance irlcrements on account of she having passed B.Ed. examination afte(- her appointment at her own cost. It is submitted that the issue inv no longer res integra and the same hj Hontile Supreme Court in the case of ^sba Saaena Vs. State of M.P. & Ons. 2009 (III)MPJR (SC) 59. It is further submitted that this view in its order dated 6.2.2009 pas^ >lved in the present petition is is been finally decided by the Counsel for the petitioner further ^ubmits that the order dated 29.4.2010 passed in Writ Appeal N p. 124/2009, wherein relyinj upon thejudgment of the Supreme Cc|urt in the case ofAsha Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this Cjsurt in another Writ Appeal No. 87/2009, directions have been issued Court has also taken a similar ed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. For consideration of the case for grant of two advance increments as| per circular dated 21.9.1974 issued by the State of Madhya Prade^h, after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition. Counsel for the State submitfe would also be considered on the sannel In view of above.the petition i^ the respondent authorities to decide| grant of two advance iacrements a^ that case of the petitioners lines. disposed of with a direction to the claim of the petitioner for per circular dated 21.9.1974 l'7f[^ ^f^ HC-22 'S^SI rt{\ii\v\i\, Bfll^'KS. RlCII'My Sf^f TR^? *<|t<CTI g,,,,,^ --—-—-•—--' g^ y^ '1?F6^(" sn^r^t R'li.cb an^i s(i+iicti ~^^f ^. an^r ^Biiwgftg issued by the State of Madhya Prad< pleaded in the petition within a perioc It is made clear that this Coui on merits of the case and the authorj to decide the same strictly in accordai jsh after verification of the facts of eight weeks froin today. -t: has not expressed any opinion i|ty concemed would be at Uberty jhce with law. CMtft<n41i *iwnf tf fs^ ipif^K i; aipgir an^r Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge r~'^ "^RqT?i