IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-17425 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: June 28, 2010 Poonam .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Vivek K.Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.453, dated 27.12.2008, under Sections 381/120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Kapurthala City, District Kapurthala. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. Brief allegations against the petitioner-accused are that she while working as maid servant in the house of complainant committed theft of a mobile hand-set containing sim card bearing No.98147-43991 and one automatic camera make Canon. Further allegations are that the mobile was used by co-accused, i.e. father of present petitioner and hence he was arrested in this case. However, no recovery has been effected. Hence, as recovery of stolen articles are yet to the effected from the petitioner-accused, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner- Poonam for grant of anticipatory bail is dismissed being devoid of any merit. 28.6.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge