1 S.B. Civil Writ petition No. 568/2010 Dr. Chandrashekhar Kachhawa vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. and S.B. Civil Writ petition No. 569/2010 Dr. Moinuddin vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order dated 18.1.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Parmendra Bohra, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. By one common order dated 12.1.2010 two appeals were decided by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur. The facts of both the cases were clearly mentioned by the tribunal in order dated 12.1.2010, however, appeals of both the appellants were dismissed by the said order. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners are in Government service and their wives are also Government servants. In view of the above, the Government should not have passed order so as to separate the pair. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in identical facts and circumstances by other orders, the tribunal stayed the operation of the order of transfers and petitioners have placed on record the orders passed by the tribunal, however, this court finds that the tribunal after staying the operation of the order permitted the appellants 2 of those appeals to submit their representations to the competent authority with direction to the competent authority to pass appropriate order. Since the controversy is short one, therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of with direction to the petitioners to submit their representations to the competent authority within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the competent authority may pass appropriate order within a period of 15 days thereafter after considering the representations of the petitioners. However, if the petitioners have not been relieved from the post from where they have been transferred then the operation of the order shall remain stayed. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-