IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23340 of 2010 MITHELESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANOTHER ----------- 4. 26.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Allegedly, petitioner is husband of the informant’s daughter and the marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with informant’s daughter on 8.7.2008. Subsequently, informant’s daughter was subjected to cruelty and harassment and petitioner solemnized his second marriage with one Babita Kumari. It is obvious from perusal of the record that notice was sent to informant’s daughter, but the aforesaid notice returned with endorsement of refusal and accordingly, this court presumed that the notice has already been served upon the informant’s daughter. The specific stand of the petitioner is that he never solemnized his marriage with informant’s daughter. It appears from the perusal of the impugned order of learned Sessions Judge that the petitioner had taken same stand before the learned Sessions Judge also. Considering the aforesaid facts and 2 circumstances as well as submissions of the parties petitioner, namely, Mithelesh Kumar, in the event of his arrest / surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of this order to the concerned court in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 269 of 2009, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Amit ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)