Crl.M. No. M-34053 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-34053 of 2008 Date of decision : 24.3.2009. ... Daljit Singh @ Jeetu ................ Petitioner vs. State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. P.S. Hundal, Senior Advocate with Sh. Dinesh Trehan, Advocate for the petitioner. Sh. K.S. Pannu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) As per allegation of the prosecution, the petitioner not only forged Power of Attorney, but has also forged the Will of one Gurbax Singh. He has also got burnt the record in connivance with revenue officials. The gravity of offence does not make out a case for grant of bail to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in custody for the last 13 months and on that account he is entitled to the concession of bail. I have carefully considered the said submission. From the perusal of the record, it is revealed that petitioner is accused in the following four other cases:- Crl.M. No. M-34053 of 2008 -2- i) FIR No. 415 dated 6.12.2006 u/s 419, 420, 467, 471, 120-B IPC P.S. Civil Lines, Amritsar. ii)FIR No. 319 dated 10.11.2005, u/s 295-A/34 IPC P.S. Jandiala, District Amritsar iii)FIR No. 62 dated 27.4.2007 u/s 336/148/149 IPC, 25/27/54/59 Arms Act, P.S. Sultanwind, District Amritsar and iv)FIR No. 34 dated 15.3.2007 u/s 436, 420, 467, 468, 471/120-B IPC P.S. A-Division, Amritsar. The petitioner seems to be a habitual offender. So, no ground for grant of bail is made out. The petition stands dismissed. ( K.C. Puri ) 24.3.2009. Judge Chugh