1 105.11-appln+ bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION NO.105 OF 2011 IN APPLICATION NO.390 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.694 OF 2009 WITH APPLICATION NO.106 OF 2011 IN APPLICATION NO.392 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.692 OF 2009 Ravindra Kumar Doshi ..Applicant Versus Raju Mohanlal Samtani (STPL) & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.Kafil Khan with Savita Mundra for Applicant. Mrs.A.A.Mane A.P.P. for State. Ms.Sumedha Sawant i/b. N.N.Amin & Co. for respondent No.2. CORAM : A.R.JOSHI, J. DATED : MARCH 10, 2011 P.C. :- 1. After hearing the rival parties for some time, for the reasons mentioned in both these applications for restoration of earlier dismissed amendment application, it is ascertained that there was sufficient cause for the applicant for remaining absent on 15th February, 2011 before this Court when the amendment applications were placed for orders. 2 105.11-appln+ 2. In the above view of the matter, the Application No.105 of 2011 in W.P. NO.694 of 2009 and Application No.106 of 2011 in W.P. No.692 of 2009 are allowed and respective Criminal Applications for amendment bearing No. 390 of 2009 and 392 of 2009 in the said Writ Petitions are restored to file. Both the said amendment applications to be heard on next date. S.O. after three weeks. (A.R. JOSHI, J.)