The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.16981 of 2007 Dated 23rd June, 2010 Between: A.Naga Lakshmi …Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh and 2 others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.M.Pitchaiah Counsel for respondent No.1: AGP for Higher Education. Counsel for respondent No.2: Mr.M.V.S.Prasad. Counsel for respondent No.3: Mr.C.Sudesh Anand, SC for APSCHE The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside G.O.Ms.No.20, dated 03-05-2006, issued by respondent No.1 as mala fide and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner sought for a consequential declaration that proceedings, dated 05-08- 2007, of respondent No.3, disqualifying the petitioner and rejecting her admission into Engineering course under sports category, as illegal and unconstitutional. At the hearing, it is fairly submitted by Sri M.Pitchaiah, learned Counsel for the petitioner, that as the petitioner failed to avail the benefit of the interim order granted by this Court on 09-08-2007, she could not get a seat in Engineering course under sports category. As the academic year, for which the petitioner sought admission, has expired, the cause of action, on which the Writ Petition was founded, does not survive for adjudication qua the petitioner. However, as rightly contended by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the issue regarding the validity of G.O.Ms.No.20, dated 03-05-2006, can be adjudicated by the Court in appropriate proceedings. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous by reserving the issues raised in this Writ Petition for consideration in appropriate proceedings. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.21692 of 2007, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 23rd June, 2010 lur