WP(C) 3890/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. M.U. Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr . Handique, learned counsel appearing for the State respondents. The petitioners by the present petition have prayed for a direction to t he respondent authorities to release the quota of S.K. Oil pursuant to the licen ses issued in their favour by the authority. According to the petitioners such q uota of such S.K. Oil were earlier issued to them up to the month of December, 2 006, but since the month of January, 2007 the authority has discontinued issuanc e of such quota to the petitioners. It appears from the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the respondent No.4 that issuance of the monthly quota of blue dyed kerosene oil has been kept in a beyance due to non-fulfilling all the conditions of the licence i.e. for not hav ing the required infrastructures such as Tri-Cycle fitted with drum as well as m easuring equipments etc. It has also been contended in the said affidavit that the Licensing Auth ority neither has suspended the licenses of the petitioners in contemplation of the cancellation nor initiated any criminal proceeding against the petitioners. It is, therefore, evident from the said affidavit-in-opposition filed th at because of the non-fulfillment of the requirement the quota of S.K. Oil has n ot been released to the petitioners. In view of the above, no direction as prayed for by the petitioners can be issued. The petitioners, however, after fulfilling the conditions required fo r the purpose of issuance of the quota may approach the Licensing Authority for release of such quota, who shall verify the same and release the quota to the pe titioners only after fulfillment of all the conditions. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.