C.W.P. No.9264 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 30.09.2008 M/s ABB Limited .....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE UMA NATH SINGH. HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY. Present : Mr.M.L.Sarin, Senior Advocate, with Mr.P.R.Sikka, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Dinesh Nagar, Advocate, for HUDA. Mr.Narender Hooda, Advocate, for Municipal Corporation. Faridabad. -.- UMA NATH SINGH, J. Vide our earlier order dated 11.9.2008, Mr.Narender Hooda, learned counsel for Municipal Corporation, Faridabad, stated that if petitioner-company deposits either of two demands in respect of outstanding charges raised by HUDA and Municipal Corporation, Faridabad both, the other authority would not raise any such demand. That order, on reproduction, reads as under:- “Shri Narender Hooda, learned counsel for Municipal Corporation of Faridabad, on instructions, states that the petitioner should deposit either of two demands of outstanding charges raised by both namely HUDA and Municipal Corporation. In that case, the other authority would not raise any demand in respect of the outstanding charges. Shri M.L.Sarin, learned senior counsel for petitioner, C.W.P. No.9264 of 2008 2 on the other hand, states that the petitioner has already discharged it liability by paying the entire amount towards outstanding charges. However, as Shri Hooda prays for time to file a reply, this matter is adjourned to 30.9.2008. Interim order to continue till the next date of hearing.” As in connected Civil Writ Petition No.3219 of 2007 (M/s ABB Limited Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority), we have quashed the demand notices with liberty to respondent-authority to enhance the rate of simple interest from 7% to 10% p.a., this writ petition would stand disposed of being covered by that judgment. For all the aforesaid, this writ petition is allowed and demand notices dated 16.3.2007 (Annexure P-29) and 6.9.2007 (Annexure P-41) are quashed. (UMA NATH SINGH) JUDGE 30-09-2008 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) *mohinder JUDGE Whether this judgment be referred to Reporter or not? YES/NO