IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15060 of 2011 SAURAV YADAV @ SAURAV KUMAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 02 18.05.2011 Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. It appears that the complainant during matrimonial proceeding before the trial court refused to reside with the petitioner. In the circumstances, petitioner is ready to deposit Rs. 1,000/- per month from July, 2010 in the account of the complainant by second week of every month. The petitioner will serve a copy of the order to the complainant when it is expected that the complainant will supply her bank account number to the petitioner within two 2 weeks from today. The aforesaid payment will be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial or maintenance proceedings. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 1060C of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Munger, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)