Crl. Misc. No. M –27186 of 2009 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. Misc. No. M –27186 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision:- 24.5.2010 Kamalpreet Singh @ Kamal & Ors. ... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab & Ors. ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Mr. A.S.Khinda, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Raghbir Chaudhary, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Ms. Mandeep Kaur, Advocate for Mr. D.S.Nigha, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3. Gurdev Singh, J (oral) Heard. The petitioners- Kamalpreet Singh @ Kamal, Malook Singh, Satnam Singh and Honey have preferred this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the FIR No. 127 dated 11.8.2008, registered under Sections 324, 34 and 326 at Police Station Tanda, District Hoshiarpur, on the basis of the compromise, which has been affected between them and respondent No.2 and 3. On notice of motion having been issued, reply was filed by the State. Affidavit on behalf of respondent No.2 was filed in which the factum of the compromise was admitted. The trial Court was directed to submit its report regarding the genuineness of the compromise so entered into between the parties and to Crl. Misc. No. M –27186 of 2009 (O&M) -2- submit its report after recording their statements. Report of the trial Court has been received. As per that report statements of the parties except Kamalpreet Singh - petitioner have been recorded. Statement of Kamalpreet Singh could not be recorded as he did not appear before the trial Court. It was held by Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh & Ors VS. State of Punjab, 2007(3)RCR (Crl) 1052 that the parties can enter into compromise even in respect of those offences which are not compoundable and the FIR can be quashed on the basis thereof. In view of the compromise, the FIR and the subsequent proceedings are quashed qua Malook Singh, Satnam Singh and Honey. No order is made in respect of Kamalpreet Singh- petitioner as he did not appear before the trial Court to make a statement regarding the compromise inspite of the notice. The petition is disposed of accordingly. May 24, 2010 (Gurdev Singh) tripti Judge