THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.857 of 2010 ORDER: The respondents filed O.S.No.960 of 2003 in the Court of VII Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad against the petitioner and another, said to be for the relief of administration of suit schedule properties. The suit was decreed on 30.06.2008. The petitioner filed CCCA.No.249 of 2008 before this Court. An order of interim stay of the decree was granted on 02.12.2008 and the same was extended on 17.04.2009 until further orders. This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents have committed contempt of Court. The basis pleaded by the petitioner is that the respondents filed R.C.No.379 of 2008 against her father and the sole basis for that R.C. is the decree in O.S.No.960 of 2003. According to the petitioner, once this Court stayed the operation of the decree, the respondents ought not to have proceeded with the suit. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. On the face of it, the contempt case is frivolous and not maintainable. The petitioner herself was not aware of the scope of the decree in the suit. The only act of alleged contempt attributed to the respondents is that they are pursuing R.C.No.379 of 2008. The petitioner herself is not clear as to whether the R.C. was filed before or after the decree in the suit. It is not in dispute that the petitioner is not a party to the R.C. It is just unthinkable as to how the respondents can be held guilty of contempt of Court on account of their pursuing R.C.No.379 of 2008. The contempt case is accordingly closed. __________ 23.08.2010 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.857 of 2010 Date: 23.08.2010 JSU