IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 11660 of 2008 Between: Akula Sri Ramulu Educational Society, rep. by its Chairman A. Sriramulu, S/o. A. Gopayya, D.No.6-65, Bye-pass Road, Pydipuram, Tanuku, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Panchayath Officer, East Godavari District, Kakinada. 2 The Divisional Panchayath Officer, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 3 The Panchayath Secretary, Palacherla Village, Rajanagaram Mandal, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the undated notice issued by the 3rd respondent and which was received on 30.05.2008 by the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, and consequently direct the respondents not to obstruct the construction of the colleges Akula Manikyam College of Engineering and Technology for Women and Rajamandry Engineering College in Sy.No.229, 233 situated at Palacherla Village, Rajanagaram Mandal East Godavari District. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.RAMBABU SAMBANGI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Mr.M.Prabhakar The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No.11660 of 2008 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is clear from the material placed before this Court that the impugned notice, dated 30.05.2008, is only a show-cause notice, under which, the petitioner was called upon to submit its explanation against the proposed action. In the circumstances, it is for the petitioner to submit its explanation and in case, any adverse order is passed, it is open to it to work out the appropriate remedy available under law. As on today, it cannot be said that there is any cause of action to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as premature. However, this shall not preclude the petitioner from submitting its explanation to the impugned notice. No costs. _______________ 10.06.2008 VGB