• (^^ ^ ^^ <;•^ TN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS.lNO. 6{\^ /2009 PETITIONERS: .^" ^^ ixi/ ^^y' ^wy '••' ,^ ./.^ ^> .^ 1) Santram Naik S/o Brijbhushan Singh Naik, Aged about 50 years, Upper Division Teacher Govtemnient Middle School, Sakrali, Block Dabhara, District Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 2) Ganiram Paikara S/o Shri Shivprasad Paikra Aged about 48 years, Lecturer Govtemment High School, Nagarda, Block Shakti, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh: Through The Secretary; School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C,G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHERWRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. !iaWE>B^uAfrUBB^au^44^ttBM?<ewraui ••sssw:Wf^,-^^.^ -u flIGH COUR'F 0E RHHAmSGARJB ATBILASPUR ^^^- ^ jeEIinONERS SantTaaNailc&ano&w. VERSUS State ofOihattisgarh & aaotto. :. RESPQNDENTS .....„,.,. WRIF PETICTQN UNDai ARTICLE 226 OP THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA - SB:I^^ ISsseS,SImDJtSateLA3voeate&^petiti<a^ ~SluiM^;S^hatia,^ puty<?ovea"BmsntAd^ (Pasad on 10fc day af Noiv®mber,2009) ^ With the consent of leamed coimsel appearing for tfie {Wtties, the petition is heard tmsihf^ • • : - - ! •• Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner sublnitB that the petitionws were appointed on tfae post of Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay scale of Rs, 158/- on probation. After completiffll oftheiT t»Bl)atwnperiod, the petitiorien were granted tegular pay scate. Leanrtd couaseliuitte' submit^tt!^ Uie issae involved in the case is agto wiigther the petitioners we &ntitledtoregular pay seale with effect fi-om the date ofuutial ajyointaent or aflBr ccmpletfon afprobation period. The ' issue iavolved herein was considered bv the Madhva Pndesh State Admuusfaative TribiuaL Jabalpur Qfe ^ort "the &4.?"^ ia O.A.No.2745/89 (AfadhUkantTadu afidS6othersvs.StateafM.P.& ofhers), wherein it waa held that the sinulariy situated teachers are entitled to regular pay aGAe'w.e.f. the date ofimtialai^mtmenfcThemattewastakeniytotheSiywmeCteurtIh was dismissed by the Supreme Court; upholding the deeisioa of tfie Tribtiaat to the effect Aat the Teachere/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale fiom daterfimtialappouittnent. • ' Inviewoffhe above sabmissions inade by leamed coungelfortlteparties, the writ ^petition is disposed of in fhe same terms i.e.,&e petitioiars are granted lifeaty to make a rejn-esetitation, if so adviged, to consider the petiticmera croe nn Ss ovM meritand perspective, ifthe petitiCTiere'stand on the saine footings as per order passed by tfie SAT mMadhukantTadu(wpta)snd subsequently confinnedby the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93 byorder dated 3-1-1994and erantt'eliefaccoriinelY. . Inview offoregoing,thewritpetttionis disposeAof. Sd'- -sk^r ibotn