IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11287 of 2010 1. CHANDRIKA YADAV S/O NANHAKU YADAV R/O VILL.- SHIV RAMPURE, P.O.- RAILLY, P.S.- BELAGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA 2. BIRENDRA YADAV S/O CHANDRIKA YADAV R/O VILL.- SHIV RAMPURE, P.O.- RAILLY, P.S.- BELAGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA 3. UPENDRA YADAV S/O CHANDRIKA YADAV R/O VILL.- SHIV RAMPURE, P.O.- RAILLY, P.S.- BELAGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA 4. RAVINDRA KUMAR S/O CHANDRIKA YADAV R/O VILL.- SHIV RAMPURE, P.O.- RAILLY, P.S.- BELAGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA 5. MAHENDRA KUMAR S/O CHANDRIKA YADAV R/O VILL.- SHIV RAMPURE, P.O.- RAILLY, P.S.- BELAGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA 6. SATYENDRA KUMAR S/O CHANDRIKA YADAV R/O VILL.- SHIV RAMPURE, P.O.- RAILLY, P.S.- BELAGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA 7. ZIRA DEVI W/O CHANDRIKA YADAV R/O VILL.- SHIV RAMPURE, P.O.- RAILLY, P.S.- BELAGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA Versus 1. KRIT YADAV S/O NANHKU YADAV R/O VILL.- SHIV RAMPURE, P.O. RAILLY, P.S. BELAGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA 2. JITENDRA KUMAR S/O KRIT YADAV R/O VILL.- SHIV RAMPURE, P.O. RAILLY, P.S. BELAGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA 3. DEOMATIYA DEVI W/O KRIT YADAV R/O VILL.- SHIV RAMPURE, P.O. RAILLY, P.S. BELAGANJ, DISTT.- GAYA ----------- 3/ 06/01/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Questioning the order dated 5.9.2008 allowing the amendment preferred by the plaintiff/respondents it is submitted that the earlier application for amendment had been rejected on 23.7.2008. It was neither challenged nor any application for restoration was filed. It appears that on 23.7.2008 the amendment application was dismissed as not pressed without any adjudicatory order on it. The Court is satisfied that nothing precluded the respondents from moving a fresh application for amendment unless and until an adjudicatory order was - 2 - passed thereupon. The application is dismissed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)