cp389.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 389 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 221 OF 2010 Ajay Sampatraj Gadiya ...Petitioner Versus Tejrao B. Gadekar and another ...Respondents ..... Mr. S.R. Dehple h/f Mr. P.R. Nangare, advocate for the petitioner Mr. P.S. Pawar, Advocate for respondents ..... CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 29TH SEPTEMBER, 2011 PER COURT:- 1 This contempt petition is filed alleging disobedience of order dated 18.1.2010 passed by the Division Bench in writ petition No.221 of 2010. 2 Pursuant to the notice issued in this contempt petition, affidavit in replies are filed on behalf of both the respondents. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that on 26.9.2011, the respondent authorities have decided the representation of the cp389.10 2 petitioner after giving him an opportunity of hearing. This fact is not disputed by the counsel for the petitioner. However, the grievance of the petitioner is that the decision rendered by the respondents is against him. 3 Be that as it may, in my opinion, since the order of which the contempt is alleged, has been complied with, nothing further survives for consideration in the instant contempt petition. The contempt petitioner stands disposed of accordingly. Notice stands discharged. 4 Needless to observe that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent authorities, it is open for him to challenge the said order by resorting to appropriate proceeding before the appropriate forum, as available in law, if so advised. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) rlj/