IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23777 of 2010 ASHOK KUMAR @ ASHOK RAY @ BHATPELU, SON OF YOGENDRA RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.25573 of 2010 1. GOPICHAND @ PRAKASH KUMAR 2. RANJEET RAI @ RANJEET KUMAR BOTH SONS OF KANSHI LAL RAI @ KANSI RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that even accepting the prosecution case, there is no overt act of assault against the petitioners. The further submission is that in fact, there was land dispute between the parties and they have been falsely implicated on account of the same. In view of such, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in Gardani Bagh P.S. Case No. 71 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of 2 the petitioners. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)