IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 30TH MARCH 2009 / 9TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9234 of 2009(Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.S.RAMACHANDRAN,TEJUS HOUSE, PAZHAKULAM WEST,PALLIKAL VILLAGE, ADOOR THALUK. BY ADV. SRI.RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, R.D.O.OFFICE,ADOOR. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, PALLICKAL,ADOOR. 4. DISTRICT GEOLOGIST, DISTRICT OFFICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY SC SRI. M. SASEENDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.9234 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 30th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT Ext.P11 notice is under challenge. Petitioner submits that by Ext.P8 he sought permission of the 2nd respondent for leveling the property mentioned therein. It is stated that pursuant to Ext.P8 and on the directions of this court, as per Ext.P9 judgment, the 2nd respondent obtained Ext.P10 report from the 3rd respondent. Thereafter he issued Ext.P11 notice to the petitioner, to the effect that he has no power to entertain Ext.P8. It is in these circumstances the writ petition is filed. 2. When the matter came up for admission on 23.3.2009, the case was adjourned with a direction to the Government Pleader to obtain instructions in the matter and today it is submitted that Ext.P11 was issued on mistaken appreciation of facts. WP(c).No.9234/09 /2/ 3. Therefore Ext.P11 will stand quashed and the 2nd respondent is directed to consider Ext.P8 in the light of Ext.P10 report, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.9234/09 /2/