15.wp.9662-09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.9662 OF 2009 Dnyanganga Shikshan Prasarak Mandal. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and another. ..Respondents. ... Mr.A.B. Borkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.S.N. Patil, AGP, for Respondent No.1. ... CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 28, 2010. P.C. 1. The petitioner terminated services of a teacher. That teacher was directed to be taken back in service with back wages by the College Tribunal. The Management sought grant from the Government for paying the back wages to that teacher. The Government refused to pay such grant. The College is of the petitioner. It is their decision to terminate services of a teacher. If that decision has been found to be illegal by the College Tribunal, the liability to bear the consequences 15.wp.9662-09 2 of that decision is of the Management. The petitioner cannot force the Government to pay the same. That the Management has paid to the teacher who was appointed on clock basis after termination of the concerned teacher is not relevant because ultimately the College is of the petitioner and it is their responsibility to bear all the consequences. The Government pays them grant and obliges them. There is no right in it to get the grant. Petition is rejected. (D.K. DESHMUKH,J.) (A.R. JOSHI, J.)