IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15109 of 2011 Nageshwar Das, S/O Late Lakhan Das, R/O Vill.-Mande Bigha, P.S.- Jehanabad, Distt.-Jehanabad. . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Food and Civil Supply, Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Jehanabad, Bihar. 3. The Block Development Officer, Jehanabad. 4. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Mande Bigha, Jehanabad. 5. The Panchayat Secretary, Grm Panchayat Raj, Mande Bigha, Jehanabad. 6. The Zila Parishad, Gram Panchayat Raj, Mande Bigha, Jehanabad through its Chairman. . . . . . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 27.09.2011 The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer within Jehanabad Block in the district of Jehanabad, prays for quashing letter no.1810 dated 30.07.2011 and letter no.1902 dated 10.08.2011, both issued under the signature of Block Development Officer, Jehanabad, whereby he has been directed to refund the value of 258.25 quintals of undistributed rice allotted under SGRY Scheme. The petitioner submits that in first notice dated 30.07.2011 he was directed to refund the rice at BPL rate of Rs.6.30 per kg. and in the subsequent letter no.1902 dated 10.8.2011 he has been directed to refund the same quantity of rice at a enhanced rate of Rs.13.70 kg. The petitioner refused the calculation of the respondent and submits that he has been allotted 390 quintals of rice out of which he distributed 273.75 quintals of rice against the valid permits. Thus he submits that only 116.25 quintals of rice would remain in his stock. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order 2 dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that he would refund 30 % of 116.25 quintals of rice as claimed by the petitioner to have remained undistributed at the rate of Rs.10/- per kg within six weeks from today. This Court has not gone into the quantity of rice alleged to have allotted to the petitioner by the respondents. The representation of the petitioner would be disposed of within a further period of 10 weeks. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)