IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.42 of 2009 NIRANJAN GAIN Versus NAND KISHORE SAH ----------- 2. 16.1.2009 This Court would not find any error in the impugned order. The suit is of the year 1999 and after repeated indulgence given to the plaintiff petitioner the court had passed an order closing the evidence. The reasoned order passed by the court below has not in fact been sought to be assailed by suggesting it to be based on any error of record. That being so, it becomes admitted fact that the plaintiff petitioner has been deliberately delaying the disposal of the suit. In that view of the matter, the impugned order does not suffer from any error so as to be interfered by this Court in exercise of power under section 115 C.P.C. This application is wholly misconceived and is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/