1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.1081 OF 2006 Shivaji Parshuram Jagdale & Ors. .. Appellants V/s Sonabai Namdeo Bagal & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.V.S.Kapse, Advocate for the Appellant.s Mr.Ajit J.Kenjale i/by Mr.Rajendra Ghorpade, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 24th February, 2011. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. Parties have tendered the consent terms dated 28.1.2011 signed by the parties and their respective Advocates. The Consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. 2. Appellant No.2- Tanaji Parshuram Jagdale is present on behalf of the Appellants. Maruti Namdeo Bagal, son of Respondent No.1 and Dnyaneshwar Dada Jagdale, son of Respondent No.2 are present before the Court. They admit execution of the consent terms. It is not in dispute that pursuant to clause (2) of the consent terms, the Appellants have paid Rs.3,50,000/- each to the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 by way of cheques which have been encashed by Respondent Nos.1 & 2. 2 3. I am satisfied that the controversy between the parties has been amicably settled by way of lawful compromise. In view thereof, the orders passed by the Courts below are quashed and set aside and shall be substituted in terms of the consent terms. The decree shall be drawn accordingly. Second appeal stands disposed of in terms of the consent terms, with no order as to costs. (R.G.KETKAR, J.)