IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8513 of 2011 1. JITENDRA RAI SON OF GANI RAI. 2. SUKAN RAI, SON OF LATE RAMASHRAY RAI. -------------- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the co-villager of the informant are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the occurrence took place on 11.10.2008 when Rs. 70,000/- and other articles were taken away. The informant identified these two petitioners. The F.I.R. and the Complaint were lodged for the same occurence after four days of the occurence. There is material inconsistency between the averments made in the F.I.R. A statement made in para 16 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the delayed lodging of both, F.I.R., and complainant and the inconsistency, the 2 accusation does not inspire confidence, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 155 /2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)