Writ Petition no. 1043 of 1996-old number Writ Petition no. 372(S/S) of 2001- New Number Sarda Singh ----- Petitioner Versus State and others Respondents Writ Petition no. 24804 of 1999-old number Writ Petition no. 1792(S/S) of 2001- New Number Chandi Prasad ----- Petitioner Versus State and others Respondents Writ Petition no. 2596 of 1996-old number Writ Petition no. 400(S/S) of 2001- New Number Surendra Dutt ----- Petitioner Versus State and others Respondents Writ Petition no. 1193 of 1996-old number Writ Petition no. 407(S/S) of 2001- New Number Pradeep Kumar ----- Petitioner Versus State and others Respondents Hon’ble M.M.Ghildiyal,J. All the above mentioned writ petitions involve common question of law and in these similar relief of regularization in the Forest Department has been claimed. These writ petitions are, therefore, taken up together and disposed of by a common judgment. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel. The petitioners claim themselves to be the daily wage employees in the forest department and covered by the decision given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal no. 3634 of 1998 State of U.P. and others Vs. Putti Lal. Learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned S.C. agree that direction may be given to the respondents to consider the cased of these petitioners in the light of the said judgment of the Apex Court and those of the petitioners who are covered by the said decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court be regularized and minimum of pay scale be also paid to them until their services are regularized. Let the necessary exercise be done within a period of six weeks. All the aforesaid petitions are disposed of accordingly. Let the original judgment be placed on the record of Writ petition no. 372(S/S) of 2001 and its copy be placed on the record of other writ petitions. (M.M.Ghildiyal,J.) July 16, 2003 MPS