IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 20TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 29TH KARTHIKA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3759 of 2008() ----------------------------------------- CRA.330/2007 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, KOTTAYAM CC.1168/2004 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS , ETTUMANUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT/ ACCUSED ------------------------------- THOMAS CHACKO, VELLIMANGALAM HOUSE, SREEKANDAMANGALAM P.O., ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.A.K.HARIDAS RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS / STATE & COMPLAINANT ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. P.K.DIVAKARAN, PUTHENPURACKAL HOUSE, NEENDOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM. ADV. SRI.G.ANANTHANARAYANAN FOR R2 PUBLIC PROSECUTORSRI.C.M.KAMAPPU THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. ........................................... CRL.R.P.NO. 3759 OF 2008 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 20th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2008 ORDER Revision petitioner is the accused and second respondent, the complainant in C.C.1168 of 2004 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ettumanoor. Petitioner was convicted and sentenced for the offence under Section 138 of N.I.Act. Petitioner challenged the conviction before Sessions Court, Kottayam in Crl.A.330 of 2007. Appeal was dismissed confirming the conviction and sentence. Revision petition is filed challenging the conviction. 2. Second respondent, along with revision petitioner filed Crl.M.A.11567 of 2008, an application under Section 147 of N.I.Act, seeking permission to compound the offence, stating that they have amicably settled the dispute and second respondent has received the entire amount due from revision petitioner. Crl.M.A.11567 of 2008 is allowed. Permission is granted to compound the offence. Offence is compounded. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE lgk/-