IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2008 / 11TH CHAITHRA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 77 of 2007(S) ------------------------------------------------------- ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.340/2000 Dated 13/12/2005 .................... PETITIONERS/ADDL.APPELLANTS:- -------------------------------------------------- 1. P.K. BINDU, 4/575A, RAJIV SALAI, OLD MAHABALIPURAM ROAD, KOTTIVAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 041. 2. P.K. BEENA, 4/575A, RAJIV SALAI, OLD MAHABALIPURAM ROAD, KOTTIVAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 041. 3. P.K. BIJU, 4/575A, RAJIV SALAI, OLD MAHABALIPURAM ROAD, KOTTIVAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 041. 4. P.K. BRINDA, 4/575A, RAJIV SALAI, OLD MAHABALIPURAM ROAD, KOTTIVAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 041. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR SRI.K.P.SUDHEER SMT.PRIYA VIJAYAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS:- ---------------------------------------------- 1. K.J.MATHEW (FATHER'S NAME & AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS) SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. coc nO.77/2007 -2- 2. N. SASIDHARAN, AGED 54 YEARS, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS), DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOZHIKODE. 3. SANTHAMMA MATHEW, AGED 53 YEARS, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS), HEADMISTRESS, GOVERNMENT GANAPATH HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, FEROKE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA. SRI.P.P.JACOB THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.M.JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------------------ Contempt Case (Civil) No.77 of 2007-S ------------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 31st day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. Alleging that the respondents have disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court in W.A.No.340/2000 disposed of on 13th December, 2005, the complainants/appellants have presented this contempt case. (2). Smt.K.Meera, learned Government Pleader, on instruction, would submit that the respondents being aggrieved by the orders passed by this Court have filed a Special Leave Petition before the Apex Court. (3). We do not disbelieve the statement made by the learned Government Pleader. Placing on record the statement made by the learned Government Pleader, the contempt petition is closed for the present. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners/complainants to approach this Court, if need arises in future. (4). In view of the order passed in the contempt petition, the relief sought in I.A.No. 92/2007 need not be considered by this Court.. Accordingly, the said I.A. is closed. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE MS