IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49792 of 2008 SANJEEV KUMAR SINGH @ TANKAL SINGH @ SANJEEV KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.1.2009 Heard Mr. K.N. Diwakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Mehta, learned A.P.P. The police, on secret information, conducted search of the vehicles plying on the road. The petitioner was traveling by a three-wheeler and when his vehicle was stopped and search was made on his person, recovery of one loaded country made pistol and three cartridges was made. The contention is that it is a case of false implication because the petitioner refused to sign on the seizure memo in respect of another vehicle which could be the subject matter of theft. Be that as it may, considering the direct nature of allegation and the story of recovery, the Court is not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. However, as soon as the petitioner completes one year of his confinement in the case, i.e., Raghopur P.S. case no.14 of 2008 from the first date of his remand, the court below itself shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bond to its own satisfaction. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )