IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIVINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.27 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.39 OF 2005 Union of India & Others ..Petitioners V/s. S.N. Tyagi & Another ..Respondents. And Union of India & Others ..Review Petitioners. Mr.R.R. Shetty for the petitioners. Mr.S.V. Marne for respondent No.2. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J. DATED : 20TH JUNE, 2008. P.C. : 1. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. It is stated that the counsel who made a statement before this Court on 8-1-2008 had no authority to make such a statement. We are not prepared to review our order on this ground. There is nothing on record before us that prior to filing of this application, any letter was written to the counsel or any action was taken by the competent authority. 2. It is also not possible for this Court now to consider this application within the provisions of Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the effect of the judgment of the Supreme Court relied upon by the counsel on 8-1-2008 which is now being contended is not applicable to the facts of the present case. Obviously, the respondents are at liberty to sue the counsel in accordance with law. 3. The review petition is dismissed. No costs. CHIEF JUSTICE J.P. DEVADHAR, J.