IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 878 of 2008 Sandeep @ Sanjeev S/o Gyanchand ….. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …. Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. Government Advocate for respondent the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. None for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. Government for the State. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate for the State submits before this Court that it has been indicated in para 3 of the counter affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is a prima-facie case against the petitioner, and as such the police is likely to submit chargesheet in the near future against the present petitioner. It was further submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioner seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him has, now, become infructuous. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 16.03.2009 LSR