Crl. Misc. No. M – 9825 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Crl. Misc. No. M – 9825 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 12.8.2010 Vijay Kumar ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & Ors. ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present:- Mr. K.S.Chuadhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Raghbir Chaudhary, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate, for respondents No. 4 and 5. Gurdev Singh, J (oral) Heard. The petitioner – Vijay Kumar has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal for issuing direction to respondents No. 2 & 3 for taking the cognizance on the complaint submitted by him against respondents No. 4 & 5, who caused number of injuries to him and his brother – Kuldeep Singh, by way of registering the FIR and to investigate the same. He has sought further direction to respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect his life and liberty and not to falsely implicate him in some false case at the behest of respondent No.4. On notice of motion having been issued, the official respondents filed the reply. On carefully reading the petition, reply and the statements Crl. Misc. No. M – 9825 of 2010 (O&M) -2- recorded by the police during the enquiry, which was conducted on the said application of the petitioner, it becomes clear that no cognizable offence is made out from the allegations so made by the petitioner in his application and the statements. In these circumstances, the only remedy of the petitioner is to file a criminal complaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. So far as issuance of direction to respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner, is concerned, no such prayer was made by him in the application, which was submitted before the S.S.P. Therefore, in the first instance he is to approach S.S.P for that purpose. The petition is disposed of accordingly. August 12, 2010 (Gurdev Singh) tripti Judge