CWP(T) No. 3084 of 2008. 18.12.2009. Present: Mr. Rajiv Rai, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. A.K. Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. R.P.Singh, Asstt. A.G. for the respondents. CWP(T) No. 3084 of 2008. The learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that petitioner Lachho Ram has died on 8.10.2005 and his legal representatives have been brought on record. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that prayer in the petition is mainly for regularization of Lachho Ram. The learned counsel has further submitted that in fact Lachho Ram was regularized after his death and probably the department was not aware of death of Lachho Ram. In view of these developments, the learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that he does not want to press the petition on behalf of the petitioners and the petitioners reserve their right to file another petition in case the petitioners are not given the benefits on account of regularization of Lachho Ram. Prayer granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the legal representatives of Lachho Ram, as prayed. CMP No. 2776 of 2005. Infructuous. December 18, 2009. ( Kuldip Singh ), (Hem) Judge.