CWP No. 8652 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 8652 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: May 16, 2011 Jal Singh .........PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana etc. ......RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. J.S. Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL) 1. In the index of the petition, the memo of parties reads as "Jal Singh vs. State of Haryana etc." 2. In the list of dates and events, the memo of parties reads as" Lal Singh vs. State of Haryana etc." 3. The memo of parties reads as "Ravinder Singh s/o Srichand, resident of village Sihol, Tehsil and District Palwal vs. State of Punjab through Commissioner and Secretary to Government of Haryana, Department of Development and Panchayats, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh." 4. The affidavit filed in support of the pleadings in the petition is of a person named "Jal Singh s/o Mul Chand, resident of Village Amru, Tehsil and District Palwal." 5. Even the respondent no. 1 has been wrongly reflected, as is made out on a bare perusal of the particulars of the respondent. CWP No. 8652 of 2011 2 6. I find that the petition has been filed in a very very casual manner, without responsibility and, therefore, adjudication is not possible. Precious time of the Court has been wasted. It is evident that none of the counsel, through whom the petition has been filed, has gone through the petition, before signing or filing the same. 7. Learned counsel contends that he would like to file a fresh petition without errors. Learned counsel contends that the correct name of the petitioner is "Jal Singh s/o Mul Chand, resident of village Amru, Tehsil and District Palwal." 8. In case a petition is filed in the name of the above said person, the same would be accepted by the Registry only on showing a receipt of deposit of ` 10,000 as costs in Punjab and Haryana High Court Lawyer's Welfare Fund by the learned counsel through whom the petition is filed. 16.05.2011 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?