IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2011 / 28TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 27839 of 2011(D) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ 1. NIJISH SHINE, "USHUS", ADIYIRUTHIL HOUSE, NEERIKODE P.O, ERNAKULAM, PIN-683 511. 2. ANOOP G, REVATHY HOUSE, PANNIVIZHA, ADOOR P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA- 691 523. 3. MRIDULA NAIR, NEELANJANAM, KANINADU P.O, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 310. BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J., SRI.T.G.SUNIL (PRANAVAM). RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-688 860. 2. THE REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-688 860. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-688 860. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. MR.T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G. UNIVERSITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/10/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 27839 of 2011(D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD. 15.10.11 ALONG WITH CHALAN RECEIPTS FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD. 10.10.11 ALONG WITH CHALAN RECEIPT FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DTD. 25.08.11 ALONG WITH CHALAN RECEIPT FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS. EXT.P3(A) TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DTD. 11.10.2011 ALONG WITH CHALAN RECEIPT FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 27839 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 20th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 4th Semester examination was declared, 1st petitioner failed in “Hydraulic Machines” and “Machine Tools”, 2nd petitioner failed in “Electro Magnetic Theory” in 3rd semester and the 3rd petitioner failed in “Electronics Circuits – II” in the 4th semester and “Digital Signal Processing” in 6th semester. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the University for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp