IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2007 / 22ND ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 33259 of 2004(H) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- REJIKUMAR M.K. TECHINICIAN GRADE I, MEC,ERNAKULAM, S/O.GOVINDAN NAIR, ANIZHAM VENMELIL THEKKUMBHAGAM, THRIPPUNITHURA. BY ADV. SRI.K.R.RAJKUMAR SRI.JAGADEESH LAKSHMAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, PRAJOE TOWERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF TECHINICAL EDUCATION, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI. N.N. SUGUNAPALAN(SR.) FOR R2 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. T.B.RAMANI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 33259/2004 H APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION BY THE R2 IN KERALA KAUMUDI DAILY ON 8/3/90. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE ORDER NO. E490/90/HRD DT. 30/7/90. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE ORDER NO. 1026/95(66) FIN DT. 14/12/95. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE ORDER CERTIFICATE NO. E. 4827/95/HRD DT. 23/11/95. EXT.P5. COPY OF THE LETTER NO. E. 4/3876/2000 DT. 4/7/00. EXT.P6. COPY OF THE LETTER NO. E2. 2294/98/HRD DT. 23/11/98. EXT.P7. COPY OF THE LETTER NO. E4. 6364/2000/HRD DT. 3/08/00. EXT.P8. COPY OF THE LETTER BY THE R2 DT. 23/11/00. EXT.P9. COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT. 30/2/2001. EXT.P10. COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING BETWEEN EDUCATION MINISTER STAFF OF IHRD DT. 11/3/2004. EXT.P11. COPY OF THE REMINDER TO THE REPRESENTATION DT. 1/6/04. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL. True copy tga THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.33259 OF 2004 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of July, 2007 JUDGMENT Respondents have been duly served. But there is no appearance for respondents 2 and 3. Having regard to the questions raised, I do not deem it appropriate to dispose of the matter on its merits without appropriate pleadings being placed on record by the second respondent since the matter involves public funds. Under such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing that Ext.P11 will be taken up by the second respondent, considered and disposed of within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge kkb.