1 5.wp.2104-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2104 OF 2010 Raghunath Dattaram Ghadi. ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others. ..Respondents. .......... Mr.V.M. Bhate, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.D.P. Adsule, A.P.P. for the State. Ms.Prachi Khandage, Advocate i/b. M/s. M.P. Vashi & Asso. for Respondent No.3. Mr.M.A. Choudhari, Advocate for Respondent No.2. .......... CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 11th FEBRUARY, 2011. P.C. 1. The relief claimed in this Petition is to issue direction to Respondent No.1 to disclose as to what offence has been registered against the Petitioner; and further declare that the action of Respondent Nos.1 & 2 was to act as recovery agent and to implicate the Petitioner in false case. Insofar as the first part of this relief is concerned, the same is worked out as the Petitioner has now been informed as to for what offence he is being proceeded with. In our earlier order, we had noticed that Respondent No.2 was found to be reckless and careless in respect of original documents. Insofar as that aspect is concerned, the PPD 2 5.wp.2104-10 appropriate authority has already proceeded against Respondent No.2 departmentally. Suffice it to observe that the main relief claimed in this Petition is virtually worked out. 2. The only grievance of the Petitioner is about the possibility of the Petitioner being involved in false and frivolous case. As FIR has already been registered for which the Petitioner was arrested on 21st January, 2011, it is premature to proceed on the basis that the Petitioner has been falsely implicated. Inasmuch as unless the Court of competent jurisdiction were to record such finding, such assumption cannot be drawn and enquiring into the allegations in the present Petition would be premature and improper. It will be open to the Petitioner to pursue the other remedies available to him in relation to the registration of FIR or his arrest by way of appropriate proceedings which may be permissible in law. The same will have to be decided on its own merits in accordance with law. All questions raised in this Petition are left open. 3. Petition is disposed of accordingly. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)