IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1396 of 2006 GYANI VERMA & ORS Versus SMT.GIRISH DEVI SINHA @ GIRISH DEVI ----------- 2. 14.11.2008 Surendra/ No one appears for the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. Once the court below had rejected a similar prayer of the defendant- petitioners as with regard to marking the certified copy of an F.I.R. as an exhibit on 24.10.2005, there was no occasion for the court below to entertain an exactly similar prayer of the petitioners in view of the application filed dated 7.3.2006. That being so, when the court below had on 24.10.2005 given clear reasons for not exhibiting the document, there was no justification for making such prayer nor the court could have allowed such prayer. The order dated 24.10.2005 having become final between the parties, the same issue could not have been reopened. That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)