1 Cri.Appln.No.2904/2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2904/2006 1) Jagdish s/o Shrikishan Sarda Age: 36 Yrs., occu. Agril. And Business, R/o Subhash Road, Parbhani. 2) Shrikishan s/o Ganeshlal Sarda Age: 65 Yrs., occu. Agril. And Business, r/o Subhash Rd., Parbhani. 3) Sow.Meena w/o Jagdish Sarda Age:30 Yrs., occu.Household, R/o Subhash Road, Parbhani= PETITIONERS (orig.Accused) VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Officer, Gangakhed Police Station, Gangakhed, District Parbhani. 2) Vishnukant s/o Manchakrao Kodgir, Age: 32 Yrs. Occ. Driver, R/o Samta Jawla, Tq.Gangakhed, Dist.Parbhani.=RESPONDENTS (Resp.No.2 is orig.complainant) *** Mr.NR Shaikh, APP for State ----- CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI,JJ. DATE : 18th October, 2011. ORAL JUDGMENT (PER :A.H.JOSHI,J.) 1) None for the petitioners. 2 Cri.Appln.No.2904/2006 2) Learned APP states that charge sheet was filed before the interim stay was granted by this Court. 3) Considering this aspect, now it is open to the petitioners to approach the trial Court and take steps in accordance with law. 4) The grounds raised in the petition are in the nature of defences, which cannot constitute to be the solid ground for quashment of FIR. 5) The defences is to be established in the process of trial. 6) We, therefore, discharge the Rule. Interim relief is vacated. sd/- sd/- (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.H.JOSHI,J.) bdv/