IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 1534 OF 2006 WITH CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 1537 OF 2006 Shahid Ibrahim Nakade ... Petitioner V/s. Shahin Siraj Mukadam (Shahin Shahid Nakade) ... Respondent Mr. S.M. Kazi for the Petitioner Brother of the petitioner is present in person Mr. Rakesh Ramakant Bhatkar for Respondent No. 1 Respondent No.1 is present in person Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 3, 2007 (at 3 p.m. in Chamber) P.C.:- 1. The parties have tendered Minutes of Order. The learned counsel for the parties state that the Minutes of Order have been read over, explained and understood by the parties and 1 they are made aware of the consequences. Brother of the petitioner is present in person, who has instructions from the petitioner, so also the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has verified the contents thereof from the petitioner himself, who is out of India. 2. Respondent No.1 is personally present with her advocate. She states that she understands English, and confirms the contents of the Minutes of Order, which are signed by her. 3. The Minutes of Order are taken on record, and marked 'X' for identification. The undertakings recorded in the Minutes of Order are accepted. Both the Writ Petitions stand disposed of in terms of the Minutes of Order. J.N. PATEL, J. 2