Crl.M.No.M-6065 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-6065 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 22, 2010 Shri Ram Transport Finance Co.Limited .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Manish Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. is for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent no.2 by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, vide order dated 3.11.2009, in case FIR No.307 dated 7.11.2008, under Sections 419, 420, 408, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Division No.5, Civil Lines, Ludhiana, District Ludhiana. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. Name of the petitioner has not been mentioned in the FIR. The allegations are against one Prince Sharma, who is employee of petitioner- complainant. Name of respondent no.2 figured being proprietor of M/s.Malwa Tractors, who had sold some tractors after obtaining loan from petitioner-company through co-accused Prince Sharma. He was granted anticipatory bail by learned Additional Sessions Judge on the plea that his name was not mentioned in the FIR and nothing was to be recovered from Crl.M.No.M-6065 of 2010 (O&M) -2- him. It is a State case and no petition for cancellation of bail has been filed by the State. There are no allegations that respondent no.2 misused the concession of bail granted to him. Hence, in view of these facts, the present petition filed for cancellation of bail granted to respondent no.2-Avtar Singh-accused, is dismissed, being devoid of any merit. 22.4.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge