IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 92 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 92 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 92 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1113 OF 2000 AND AND AND CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 93 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 93 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 93 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 974 OF 1999 Akruti Nirman Pvt. Ltd. ... Petitioner Versus Anil G. Shah & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.P.K.Samdhani i/b. Wadia Gandhy & Co. for the petitioner. Mr. R.V.Govilkar for Respondent No.1. Pradeep Jadhav, AGP, for Respondent No.6. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.H.BHATIA,JJ J.H.BHATIA,JJ J.H.BHATIA,JJ. DATE : 4th September, 2007. DATE : 4th September, 2007. DATE : 4th September, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. When both these Contempt Petitions were filed by the Petitioner, admittedly, consent of the Advocate General had not been taken. After taking consent of the Advocate General, on the same allegation, different petitions have been filed. Those the petitions have been admitted for final hearing, hence there is no purpose in keeping these petitions pending. Therefore, both these Petitions are disposed of. --- (D.K.DESHMUKH,J) (D.K.DESHMUKH,J) (D.K.DESHMUKH,J) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)