Crl. Rev. No. 2562 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Rev. No. 2562 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 20, 2010 Kuldeep Singh and another …..Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and another …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioners are arrived by an order dated September 9, 2010 by virtue of which the trial Court has closed the defence evidence and adjourned the case for arguments for September 16, 2010. Counsel for the petitioners informs that the petitioners want to examine two defence witnesses Prem Lal and Amir Singh. I have gone through the nature of the allegations against the petitioners and the repeated opportunities which have been given to the Crl. Rev. No. 2562 of 2010 [2] petitioner to produce defence witnesses. It appears that the petitioners have been making an attempt to prolong the trial which is based upon the allegations of house trespass of the year 2006. On asking of the Court, counsel for the petitioners informs that the case is fixed for today for arguments. It is apparent from the interim orders passed by the trial Court that having been fed up with the delaying tactics adopted by the petitioners, the Court was compelled to close the evidence. No ground is made out for interference in the order dated September 9, 2010. However, it is observed that in case the petitioner moves an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. and produce his witnesses on the same day by explaining the circumstances for the non-appearance of the defence witnesses despite the repeated opportunities given, the trial Court may allow the said application. Disposed of. September 20, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE