IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33089 of 2008 1. RAMJI PANDEY 2. BIPIN BIHARI TIWARY …… PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …... OPP. PARTY For the petitioners : - Sri Awanish Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the O.P. : - Sri D. Mehta, APP ----------- 3. 24.10.2008 Heard Sri Awanish Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners and Sri D. Mehta, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. After having being taken through the case diary and having perused Annexure-6, which is a report of the Halka Karamchari addressed to the Anchaladhikari, Bikramganj in the concerned matter, I was not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners simply for the reason that the mutation has been ordered and the correction slip has been issued by the C.I., i.e., Anchaladhikari without any local sanction. This is really a case of creating documents in order to supporting a claim or a title and as such could very well be covered by the definition of the forgery, but after being showed that the real beneficiary Rasik Bihari Tiwary has been granted anticipatory bail by a bench of this court, I do not find any option, but to direct the release of the petitioners on bail. Let petitioners Ramji Pandey and Bipin Bihari - 2 - Tiwary be released from custody on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Bikramganj in connection with Surajpura P.S. Case No. 26 of 2008. It is directed that the S.D.J.M., Bikramganj shall call for the records of mutation and issuing correction slip during the course of the trial and after summoning the Anchaladhikari, Circle Inspector and Halka Karamchari made them as additional accused under Section 319 of the Cr. P.C. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J)