IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.24140 of 2010 NITYA NAND MANDAL, S/o Yoga Nand Mandal. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 06.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 376 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that when the deceased was discovered in an injured condition by the informant the petitioner was found standing there and gave extra- judicial confession suggesting that he had committed the occurrence. During trial when the informant was examined she did not state anything about extra-judicial confession and she gave a confusing statement about the presence of the petitioner in the room where the deceased was lying. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Purnea in connection with S.Tr. No. 698 of 2010 arising out of Tikapatti P.S. Case No. 17 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close 2 relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. In case the petitioner is found tampering with the evidence immediate steps shall be taken for cancellation of bail. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)