IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1841 of 2009 Vishal Kumar S/o late Shiva Kant Mishra, through his natural guardin i.e. Mother Poonam Devi W/o late Shiva Kant Mishra R/o Rakshpal colony, Uttari Hajipur, Ward No. 13 near Sadar Hospital, PS. & District- Khagaria------------------Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar--------------------Opposite party ---------------------------------- For the Petitioner: Mr, A.K.Thakur, Advocate Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the State: Mrs. Rina Sinha, APP ------------------------ 3 15.12.2011 The accused-petitioner has preferred this revision application under section 53 of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act against the judgment and order dated 21st October, 2009 passed by learned Sessions Judge Juvenile in Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 2009 by which the conviction of the petitioner under sections 380/511 of the Indian Penal Code has been set aside and the conviction under section 457 of the Indian Penal Code has been upheld. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. It appears that the petitioner was held guilty under sections 457, 380 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code after holding trial by learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Khagaria vide judgment and order dated 24.4.2009. Thereafter the petitioner filed Criminal Appeal no. 12 of 2009. It appears that the appellate court has set aside the conviction under sections 380/511 of the Indian Penal Code but conviction under section 457 has been upheld. It appears that both the courts have considered the evidence and thereafter passed the order of conviction. I do not find 2 any ground to differ with the impugned order. It also appears from the order and judgment of the trial court that the petitioner was directed to execute a bond of Rs. 5000/- with two sureties of the like amount each vide order dated 24.4.2009 to be effective for a period of one year within which the petitioner was directed to be under constant vigil of Probation Officer. It is submitted that the period of execution of bond has already expired and there is no material on the record to show that the petitioner has committed any overt act. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case now the petitioner will not be forced to execute the bond as directed by learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board. This petition stands disposed of. RPS ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)