t, I-..>f .-^^^y^^^-^v^^c-^^^-e^^yfyy: ®- XN THE HIGHGOHRT OF JUDIGATURE AT JABALPUR. W.P.NO.""' ^ 1 /2000. PETITIONBR ; 1/«A RESPOWDENTS ; Mangaldas S/o Bul}cu,Satnaiai, R/o Gram SChunkatta, P.S.Utai, ftg<A->Ax*-J; SOya Tahsil Patan,B.i.stt.BuFg,M.P. Versus. 1.3tate o£ Madhya Pradesh, ? thcough Sub Divj.si.onalMagistrate, Tahs.LI Patan,Distt.Dyrg, M.P. 2.Town Inspeeter,Utai, Tahs-i.1 Patan, D.i.strict Burg»M.P. 3«Punarad Joshi, s/o shri ,Kartikram Joshi, R/o Chuakatta, P.S.Utai,- Tahsll Patan» Dlstt.Burg^M.P. PSTITION UNDSR ARTICLE 22S/227 OF THE GONSTITU-riON OP INDIA. ~ - ^ ~-- ---- -~'~~ ~^——— — — —— -—, <•< 'fSt •^WM^, W^Wfa, hvfWjf. __..M.£>Ma..2.43a/.2flflO WiiciT a>*<i<» •°m^i^i 'feiiwan^i st)trf^i •^i<i Anjani/- ^,^ 27.01.2003 Shrj. Prashant Mishra, Shri Ranbir Singh, G.A. e)ounsel for the pet-i-tioner for the State. Heard on I.A.No. the wr.i.t petition. Learned counsel for thel the petit.ioner would not lik^ petitJ.on as the petltloner Law Forum. Aceordlngly, I.A], tion stands dlsposedjipf as It is made elear that preclude the Coinmon Law Foru|n 6976/20i02- forwithdrawa'l of whether the proceedings. if i|aJ.tlatedbefore -i.t^ are maintaiaable or not• Certified aopy as per ^i^iyi-^-i rfw^ ^ 'fe^ ^i^R ^?3]fiOT3iltg petitloner states that to pFOGeed with the writ l|ike to approach the Common is allowed andwr-i.t peti- wtLtbdrawn. this order shall not from considering rtllesv\. Sd/- P.C. Naik Judge [-q^^fe?