AB 3400/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Mr. H. Hoque, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners. Also heard M r. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State-responde nt. Perused the Case Diary. By this application, filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioners, namely (1 )Amir Ali, (2)Suleman Nessa, (3)Mrs. Hanufa Begum and (4)Md. Shahidul Islam @ Sh ahidul Ali, in connection with Sonapur P.S. Case No.162/2011, under Sections 498 (A)/34 of IPC. Learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners, has submitted that the informant , who is the wife of the petitioner No.1, left the marital home without sufficie nt cause and that she lodged this case after filing a case for restitution of co njugal life. Learned counsel, further submitted that, the petitioner is ready an d willing to take back his wife in the marital home. The petitioner is on interim bail w.e.f. 28.10.2011. There is no adverse report against him. Considering entire aspect of the matter, I am of the opinion that, release of th e petitioner, on bail, will not adversely affect the investigation, rather the s ame may facilitate re-union between the couple. In view of above, the interim order, dated 28.10.2011, made in favour of the pet itioner aforesaid, is made absolute, subject to the condition that, the petition er shall not interfere with the investigation in any manner. The A.B. Application is disposed of.