IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2007 / 8TH SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 2345 of 2004(D) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ V.THANKAPPAN VAIDYAR, KALUVILA VEEDU, PLACHERI P.O., PUNALUR. BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT) GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPALITIES, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE PUNALUR MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, PUNALUR MUNICIPALITY, PUNALUR. 4. THE SECRETRY, PUNALUR MUNICIPALITY, PUNALUR. 5. THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.DEEPA SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.K.JAGADEESH R4I.T.S.HARIKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P(C)No.2345/2004 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA. EXT.P2. TRUE COPY OF THE AUCTION NOTICE DATED 11-7-2002 ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY, PUNALUR MUNICIPALITY. EXT.P3. TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY 11 COUNCILORS OF THE MUNICIPALITY BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P4. TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 28-7-2002 SUBMITTED BY THE COMMISSIONER. EXT.P5. TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 7-8-2002 BEFORE THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT.P6. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11-4-2003 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P7. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22-10-2003 PASSED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT. / TRUE COPY / P.S.TO JUDGE KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C)No.2345 of 2004 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of July, 2007 JUDGMENT Petitioner approached this court aggrieved by the non- implementation of Ext.P6. Sri.Krishna Mani submits that he has already relinquished his vakalat. Be that as it may, in case the petitioner has still any grievance left, he may approach the respondent Municipality. The writ petition is accordingly closed. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) ahg.