1 ao1097.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Appeal from Order No. 1097 of 2010 with Civil Application No. 1352 of 2010 IN Appeal from Order No. 1097 of 2010 Smt. Vidya Jayant Dabholkar & ors. ...Appellants v/s. Dr. Sudhir Shantaram Chaubal & ors. ..Respondents Mr. D.D. Madan, Sr. Advocate a/w. G.D. Utangale and B.V. Phadnis for Utangale & co. for the appellants. Mr. S.B. Prabhavalkar for respondents 1-15. Mr. R.V. Talashikar for respondent no. 17. Mr. S.P. Thorat for respondent no. 18. Mrs. K.K. Soraan for BMC. Smt. Vidya Jayant Dabhollkar and Jayant Manohar Dabholkar present in Court. CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J. DATED :- FEBRUARY 18, 2011. P.C. The Appellants are personally present in the Court. The Constituted Attorney of Respondent Nos. 1-15 and 17 who is the Partner of the Respondent No. 17 namely Aditya Gogari are personally present in the Court. 2 ao1097.10.sxw 2. The learned Counsel for the said parties make a statement that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and have placed on record the Consent Terms between the Appellants on the one hand and Respondents 1-15 and 17 on the other. The Respondent No. 16 has not contested the suit even in the trial Court and has also not appeared in this Court. Respondent No. 18 is a formal party in the present proceedings. The said Consent Terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. 3. The Appeal, therefore, stands disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms placed on record. 4. The learned Counsel for the appellant-plaintiffs states that the plaintiffs-appellants would file an Application for withdrawal of the suit before the learned trial Court. On such application being filed, the learned trial Court would pass the order in accordance with law. (B.R. GAVAI, J)