1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.265 OF 2006 Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's Or Judges Orders and Registar's order. Mr. J.B. Jaiswal, APP for the appellant/State, Mr. V.M. Deshpande, Advocate for the respondents. .......... Coram : K.J. Rohee, J. Dated : September 07, 2006. 1. Heard the learned APP for the appellant/State and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. It seems that the dying declaration (Exh.40) of Sarika was recorded by the Executive Magistrate on 18/6/2004 i.e. the day on which she was admitted. She succumbed to 75 % of burn injuries on 22/6/2004. In the said dying declaration she categorically stated that the burns were accidental. Nothing has been imputed by her to the 2 respondents or any of them. No doubt, the relatives of deceased Sarika stated about the ill-treatment to her by the respondents, but the said evidence is nothing but improvements as nothing was stated before the Police in that respect. Thus there appears no perversity in the judgment. Hence leave to file appeal is rejected. JUDGE asg