ssp 1 CAO 295 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.295 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO.2646 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.240 OF 1997 Dr.Vinaykumar Balkrishna Rale .....Applicant versus The University of Pune and Ors. ..... Respondent Mr.Uday P. Warunjikar, for the applicant. Mr.Girish Kulkarni a/w Ms.Swati Deshmukh i/by Mr.M.G.Kulkarni, for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. DATE: 12 th DECEMBER, 2011 P.C. 1. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the review petition. The delay is about two years and 145 days. The grounds mentioned in the civil application are as vague as it can be. One of the ground is that since 1994, the applicant is suffering from low blood pressure and low hemoglobin. None of the grounds mentioned in the civil application are sufficient worth the name, by which delay occurred in filing the review petition can be condoned. On merits, I have gone through the averments made in the review application. The grounds are taken as if an appeal is filed against the original order. The grounds taken ssp 2 CAO 295 of 2011 in the petition cannot be taken as a basis for reviewing the order. There is no sufficient grounds worth the name by which such an inordinate delay is required to be condoned, as the above civil application is nothing but an after-thought. The civil application is accordingly dismissed. 2. In view of the order passed in the civil application, the Review Petition (St) No.2646 does not survive and the same is accordingly dismissed. ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )