IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PEITITON NO. 928 (MS) OF 2009 Smt. Poonam Devi @ Pooran Devi ……Petitioner Versus Nagar Nigam Dehradun through Up Nagar Adhikari, Nagar Nigam, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. .....Respondent Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Advocate for the respondent. Dated: 26 June 2009 Hon’ble B. S. Verma, J. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following reliefs:- “(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 18.06.2009 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Dehradun in O.S. No. 392 of 2009, Smt. Poonam Devi Vs. Nagar Nigam, contained in Annexure- 3 to this writ petition. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent not to dispossess the petitioner from the property in dispute without due process of law and not to interfere in peacefully possession of the petitioner during the pendency of present writ petition. (iii) Issue any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case be passed in favour of the petitioner.” (iv) Cost of the petition be awarded in favour of the petitioner.” By the impugned order dated 18.06.2009, the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), on the request of defendant- respondent, had granted time to file objection and the date fixed is 2nd of July 2009. The petitioner, during the vacation period, filed an application under Order 13 of the General Rules (Civil) before the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), which was dismissed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.). Then the petitioner approached this Court for setting aside the order passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) The grievance of the petitioner is that the application was not heard on the date fixed and the learned court had granted time to file objection instead of hearing the petition. Treating the urgency of the petitioner this Court on 16.6.2009 has directed to the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) to entertain the Suit for hearing during the vacation period. The Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) deemed it fit to hear the injunction application after hearing the respondent and so that date has been fixed on 2nd July 2009. Keeping in view of the urgency of the petitioner, this Court is directing to learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) to hear the temporary injunction application of the petitioner on day to day basis and the same shall be disposed of on merit without further delay, and will pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Further it is directed to the respondent to file objection against temporary injunction application positively on 02.07.2009. The petitioner shall also provide all the copies of the plaint alongwith the annexures thereof, if already not supplied. With the above observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. All the pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. (B.S. Verma,J.) 26.06.2009 Virendra