IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27397 of 2011 Sipahi Mahto @ Anil Kumar Mahto son of Sri Ramashish Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3. 13.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 364, 120B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently charge sheet has been submitted under Sections 364A, 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 15.3.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. 44221 of 2010 since his name was transpired in the confessional statement of the co-accused in the present case instituted for kidnapping for the purpose of ransom. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground that there is undue delay in trial. A report was called for from the Trial Court which reveals that out of eight charge sheet witnesses three have already been examined and summons have been issued to the rest of the witnesses. In view of such, I am not inclined to review the earlier order. The prayer for bail is rejected. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)