J' jj.i, ^ * '"I ''lte^*1 A' tljit, "i. .•l'. '^,. @ AT AP! Ti^l'L/^^'JtJ VERSU; Rekhlal (§: Lekhraro. DewatigEm, S/o Parasrs^a Dewangaii, aged about 40 yesrs R/o Viilage Gurenda, P.S. Gunderdehi, District Durg (C.G.). Ku. Gavatri Bai, (As per inipugned judginent Daughter oS Rekhlal @ Lekhram Dewajigaa aged albout 11 years, being a m.0nor fhrough ber guai'diaa & inother Radhika Bai, R/o Vulage Gureda, P.S. Giuiderclehi, District Dm-g (C.G.). €••'• iAL SBCTIN 19(4) OF Present: None for the applicant. Shri P.R. Patankar, Advocate for the respondent. 2. 4 IPassed on 03^07/2008) This petition is directed against the order dated 8/2/2006 passed by First Aaditional Principal Judge, Famiiy Court District Duig in M.J.C. No. 509.'05' whereby the maintenance of Rs. 800/- per month awarded to non-applicant Ku. Gayatri Bai who is aiteged iliegitimate chiid. Nobodv is present on behaif of the appiicant. Order impugned reveats that applicant and mother of non-applicant were living together as husband and wife and non-appllcant born out of wsdiock of app!icant and mother of non-applicant but mother of non- applicant was not iega!ly wedded wife to the applicant t'nerefore, ths status of non-applicant is, of lilegitirqpte daughter but she is entitled for maintenance from applicant. The maintenance of Rs. 800/- per month awarded is neither excessive nor unust. No interference is called for. r , ^ 22^5 ^ 2 w 5. Consequent, i do not find any substance in meriis, petition Is iiabie to be dismssed and hereby dismissed. 6. !n view ofths above order M. Cri. P. No. 703/2006 stands dismissea. Sd/- [-r Sharrna