IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6119 of 2009 MITHLESH CHAUHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.711 of 2009 SANJAY CHAUHAN & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.10229 of 2009 JITENDRA MANJHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 24.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are in custody in a Police case under Section 302 and other provisions of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The submission is that the petitioners have been implicated on suspicion only. There is no eye-witness to the occurrence. The petitioner in Criminal Misc. No. 711 of 2009 has made a confessional statement naming the petitioners in other two applications. On his confessional statement the weapon of offence has been recovered. There is no denial in his application of recovery of the weapon of offence. This Court considers the same as sufficient justification to deny bail to the petitioners. The application is rejected. S.Sb/- (Navin Sinha, J.)