IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.23441 of 2010(O&M) Decided on : 04 -02-2011 Pawan Kumar Panwar ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr. S.S.Kharb, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana Mr. H.N.Mehtani, Advocate for respondent no.2. MAHESH GROVER, J The petitioner has claimed that he should be considered against the category of ex-serviceman and that he has been unduly deprived of the right of consideration. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2 on instructions from Mr. M.R.Saini, Assistant in the office of Haryana Public Service Commission who has brought the requisite information states that the petitioner has scored 41 marks in the shortlisting test whereas the cut off marks for general category was 50 marks and ex-serviceman category was 45. It is thus the contention of the learned counsel for the respondent no.2 that even if the best case of the petitioner is taken, he cannot be considered against the category of ESM for the reason that he is having 41 marks while the cut off marks in that category is 45. No ground to interfere. Hence, dismissed. February 4 , 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge