IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13292 of 2010 RAJIV KUMAR SANGAHI, SON OF DEVO SANGAHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29/04/2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in prayer portion of the petition during course of the day. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 364 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the alleged kidnapping was not for the purposes of ransom but for marriage and the victim has been recovered, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 22.2.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, in Parbatta P.S. Case No. 179 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do - 2 - so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)