Pstitioner Respondents HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH:_Bt!-ASPUR Writ Petition iCl No. 542S of2008 Aiok Trivedi, S/o. Shri K.S. Trivedi, aged about 44 years, r/o. Karmachari Cotony, Bhanupratapur, District North Bastar Kanker (CG). Versus 1) State of Chhaffisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Revehus, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur, CG. 2) Collector, Distrid North Bastar, tonteer (CG). ^^^^J^^-.^'f 0/Vrit Petition under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Pressnt: Mr. Satyam M. Tskchandani, counse! for the petWoner. Mr. Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORAL ORDER iPassed on this 7 day of fttovember, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petittoner submits that the petitioner seeRs permission of this court to withdraw this petition wfth liberty to make a representation to the concemed autlwritias and tti®same may be considered and decided by the concerned authorities, fn accordanee with iaw, on its own merit. 2) It is ordered as prayed for. 3) Accordingly, the petition is disposed (rf with a direction to the respondents/State that in the event, the representation is mErie, the same shal! be considered and decided, in accordance wiUi law on its own merits, within a period of six weeks from the date of receifA of ttie repressntation. Raju Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge