IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 12TH JANUARY 2009 / 22ND POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 1101 of 2009(F) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- N.MAHESH,PROPRIETOR, M/S.IYER AND MAHESH, NARAYANA TOWERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE THOMAS (MEVADA) RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. ASST.PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004. 2. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004. ADV. SMT. T.N.GIRIJA, SC, EPF FOR R1 & R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 1101 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 12th day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Challenge in this writ petition is Exhibit P11 order under Section 7C read with Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952. If the petitioner is aggrieved, the option available to the petitioner is to seek statutory remedy of appeal before the Appellate Tribunal. Leaving open the remedy to approach the Appellate Tribunal, the writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm