(.-^ -., s^- ^ ', ^ :^ ii';; ;i @®u-sa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATORE AT BIIASPUR (CHHATTISGAKH) G'i^^1 MISC. CIVIL CASE N0 /o^ /2010 OUT_OF.THE ORDER DATED 11/11/2008 PASSED BY THE sl'JIS^e.31LB»-S-^3_ * -.—^- ~_ "_-.^3_ ' ^ HON'BLE JUO-TICE-'teRr S^^^STFFfi^ffi^. , IN WRIT PETITION PR. N0. 6129/2008 SOBSIQOENTLY KEGISTERED AS WRIT PETITIONC'y N0. 3/.S'/2009 (UNION OF INDIA VS. STATE OF CHHATTISG2UIH S OTHERS) APPLICANTS PETTIONERS n »»-"' ^••"^ -^ A.-"' sl1.^ it-^-'''' ^>l;s ^'^ y t^'^ :*- Union of India through the Chief Conservator of the Forest-(Central),Ministry of environments and-forests, Regional office, (W.R.), Link Road No. 03, E-5 Area Colony Bhopal M.P. Versus NON-APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS 1. 2. State of Chhattisgarh through the Principal Secretary (Forests), Government Of C.G., Raipur C.G. Chairmen Cum Managing Director, M/s South Eastern Coal Limited, Bilaspur District C.G. 3. Chief General Manager, M/s South Eastern Coal Limited,, Poat Oouth—>8«uku n'tli ^u< '-jhagrakhand, Korea District C.G. SeATORRTJOtJ t—^' APPLICATION FOR <®GMAOF THE ORDER DATED 10/11/2008 AND RESTORATION OF WRIT PETITION PR. No. 6129/2008 SOBSIQENTLY REGISTERESD AS W.Pl^NO. 3/5/2009 HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGAKH AT BILASPUR APPUCANTS PETmONER M.C.C. No. 106 (rf2010 Umonofladia. VER8US NON-APPLICANTS : StateofCUhat&gaA&Otters. RESPONDENTS APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE QRDHl DATED 10.12.2008 AND RESTORATION OF WRIT PETITOIN PR. No. 6129/2008 SUBSEQUENTLY REGISTERED AS W.P.fc) N0. 315/2a» SB; Hon'Me Shri Satish K. AenUiotel.J. Present: Shri Shekhar Shanna, Advocate forIhe apf^cast. Shri N.N.Rpy, Panel LawyerfOTthe State. Dr. N.K-Shukla, Sarior Advocate with Shri Shailendra Sta&la, Advocate for &e respcmdent No. 2 aad 3. ORALORDER (Passed on 19 day of March, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel ^pearu^ fw tfie applieant, <a indructiom, seeks pennission of this court to withdraw this petMen wifli liberty to file a properly constituted petition. 2. Leamed counsel appearmg for other ade have no objecrion. 3. It is ordered accwdiagly. 4. Consequently, the petition is disniissed as wMidrawn wifli the afor^tated liberty, ifso advised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge