IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2009 / 30TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 35458 of 2008(U) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- NEELI ABRAHAM, D/O. P.T. ABRAHAM, PLAMKADAVIL HOUSE, SACHIVOTHAMAPURAM POST, KURICHY VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADVOCATE MR.P.KURUVILLA JACOB RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE PRINCIPAL, GOVT. LAW COLLEGE, TRICHUR. 2. REGIONAL DIRECTOR, SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY AND APPLIED SCIENCES, M.G. UNIVERSITY, PULLARIKUNNU CAMPUS, MALLOOSSERY P.O., KOTTAYAM. 3. THE REGISTRAR, M.G. UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA POST, KOTTAYAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SUDHADEVI FOR R1 BY ADVOCATE MR. T.A.SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ----------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 35458 of 2008 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner was a candidate selected to undergo three years LL.B course at the Government Law College, Trichur. She was directed to produce T.C. and Conduct Certificate from the 2nd respondent before 29/11/2008. However, when the petitioner approached the second respondent, under whom she studying for M.Sc Course (Computer Engineering and Net work technology), he intimated his inability to issue the certificate for the reason that Viva-Voce had not been completed at that point of time. In view of the above, petitioner was not in a position to produce the T.C. and join the college and that led the petitioner to file this petition. 2. Standing counsel for the second respondent informs that they have already issued T.C and Conduct Certificate to the petitioner and the petitioner informs that the documents were already been sent to the first respondent. Government Pleader on instruction informs that seats are still vacant in the first semester LL.B course in the respondent W.P.(C) No. 35458 /2008 2 college. 3. From the facts, it is evident that the delay on the part of the petitioner in producing the certificate occurred due to reasons beyond the control of the petitioner and but for this, the petitioner would have got admitted in the course, when she reported to the first respondent on 28/11/2008. Now that the certificate have been issued by the second respondent and the petitioner has produced the same before the first respondent, in view of the availability of seats, I think, in the interest of justice, the petitioner should be admitted to the first year LL.B course. Therefore, it is ordered that on production of copy of this judgment, if the petitioner has already been produced T.C and Conduct certificate issued before the first respondent, first respondent shall admit the petitioner for the first year LL. B course forthwith. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm