IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1547 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE and MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? 1 to 5 No -------------------------------------------------------------- UNITED COMPEX Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: NANAVATI & NANAVATI for Petitioners MR ND GOHIL for the State MR HARESH TRIVEDI for GPCB MR YF MEHTA for GIDC -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE and MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA Date of decision: 29/04/99 ORAL JUDGEMENT : [Per: Dave, J.] 1. The petitioners are before us by taking out this petition asking for the principal prayer that appropriate orders should be passed for their exoneration from two suo moto proceedings, which have been registered as Spl.C.A. No. 6926 of 1994 and/or Spl. C.A. No. 14019 of 1994. 2. We have passed the certain orders in Spl.C.A. No. 7415 of 1998 along with certain other matters on November 13, 1998. 3. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner Industry and Mr. Haresh Trivedi, the learned counsel appearing for the GPCB, we are of opinion that these proceedings also require to be disposed of on the same line. 4. We, therefore, dispose of these proceedings by saying that the petitioner shall stand exonerated from the above said two main petitions. Rule or the Notice, as the case may be, in those proceedings against the petitioners, shall stand discharged. 5. While disposing of Spl. C.A. No. 7415 of 1998 with certain other matters under the Orders dated November 13, 1998, we have imposed certain terms and conditions. The said terms and conditions shall also be applicable to the Industry before us in these proceedings. 6. While passing these orders, we have taken into consideration the report coming from the GPCB. According to this report, the Industry came to be visited on April 12, 1999 and the inspection and analysis reports would go to show that the Industry was behaving to the satisfaction of the GPCB. This aspect also has been taken into consideration by us. 7. These proceedings, therefore, shall stand disposed of with these orders with no orders as to costs. The copy of the inspection report along with the analysis report being presented by learned counsel Mr. Trivedi for the GPCB be retained on record. ---------- p.n.nair