IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 760 of 2002 Date of decision: 05.01.2010 State of H.P. & Ors. …. Petitioners Versus Bhagat Ram …. Respondent Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioners: Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General. For the respondent: Ms. Nishi Goel vice Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. Per Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral): This petition is directed against the order of the learned H.P. State Administrative Tribunal, whereby the termination of the services of the petitioner on daily wage basis was set aside. The challenge to the order is on the ground that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to decide the mater. Ms. Nishi Goel points out that in fact the petitioner has been regularized in service on 7.9.2007. Since the State itself has regularized the services of the petitioner, the writ petition has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 In view of the final disposal of the main writ petition, interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. ( Deepak Gupta ), Judge ( V.K. Ahuja ), January 05, 2010 Judge (BSS) 3