IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2011 / 10TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 17737 of 2011(N) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- KUNJOONJU, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, MATTATHIL PARAMBIL, VEROOR P.O., CHETHIPUZHA VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY, SRI.GOKUL DAS V.V.H, SMT.A.SABITHA. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. VILLAGE OFFICER, CHETHIPUZHA VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN – 686 101. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, KURICHY VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN- 686 101. 3. SECRETARY, KURICHY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KURICHY, KOTTAYAM, PIN – 686 549. 4. KURICHY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KURICHY, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN – 686 549. 5. LEELAMMA @ MARIA, D/O.ISSAC VARGHESE, KUNNUMPURAM HOUSE, ITHITHANAM KARA, ITHITHANAM P.O., KURICHY VILLAGE, PIN – 686 549. 6. KUTTAN, S/O.KUNJAN, PANDANGODITHARA HOUSE, EDAYAPADY BHAGAM, ENACHIRA, CHETHIPPUZHA, PIN – 688 530. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.17737/2011-N: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER REGISTERED BEFORE THE SUB REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, CHANGANACHERRY. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 07/04/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 17737 OF 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T After carefully going through the pleadings in this writ petition and after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered view that the issue involved in this writ petition is purely a civil dispute. There cannot be any doubt with respect to the said position that such a dispute can be dissolved only in a properly instituted civil proceedings. Therefore, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to pursue such remedy available under the law, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE jma //true copy// P.A to Judge