C/gWw IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C .6.) $ani nch ge Be M797Q/ /2o11 W.P. (5) NO. Kl , PETITIONER ‘ Middle Paii Navapum, ‘Disff. Korba (6.6.) VERSUS Sfm‘e of Chha‘rfisgarh Through Secre‘mr'y, Trible Welfare DeparWnenr D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) The Commissioner Trible Welfare Departmen’r Raipur‘ (61:?) ’ A ssistan’r Commissioner Trible Welfare Depam‘men‘r Kor'bo (6.6.) RESPONDENTS : 1. Joim‘ Direcfor, Treasury, accounfs and pension, Bilaspur (CG) Block Educafion Officer Poli, Dis’rr‘icT— Korbo (C.6.) ,1! Nepa’ Singh Poikora, aged obou? 56 years, 5/0 LoTe Anond Singh Poikam, Head Mas’rer, Governmenf Schoo! WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22o OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA , ’ EEIGH CGE¥RT OF CE‘EHAT’FI$GARH A? KEL&S?UR SB : HGN’WLE $HRI JU$TE$E PRKTXEH‘XER EKWAKER manggcu egwzgaei 1 PETE'E‘E@*€ER Naps} Singh Paikma KE$PGN3ENTS StatE 9f CG. iii. Ofhm‘S W» ygm'r E’ETITmN mmEté ammw 22%;;22'? giggE coKs’rri‘mmx‘: 33g mag; i, Aggearamce: Shrl K.S.,Pawar, co‘mwal far 11m: petitianar. Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, PL. far the State. om mmm {19.aa3om Grievance of the Emtitioner i121 the pmsent pcfjiiou is that ”ms paiih‘ioner was; appoinied as Teac'zmr cm a Tlxwi pay seals of Rs. 10C» 15C) for a pen‘Oz'i of two yam and after cempicm‘an cf probatiml, he was grantsé mguiar pay scala of Rs. 159—36‘3. . Cankmien 0f thc cmiaséi fm‘ time, yetitiorier i$ that he i5: Entitleé m for regular yay scale with ei7€ect from the, dam 0f mixia} aypointmmm - and his caSa is squamly covered wé‘t‘h number 0f daisions yaSsSed by thi$ Court ami al$o fhe juélgmmi mndemd by tha M.P. Stairs Administrativs Tribunal, Jabaipm‘ in O.A. Nb. 274:?!39 Wadé’takaat Yadu & 55 Otfwrs Vs. mte afMP. & mh,ersjwhm*a m it has basil held fhai similarky piaceai teachms are éméfisd for reguiar pay scaia from me. date of théir mitial agmoin’cmant. .| H is not disputfaii by both tha pmtiss ihat mi: :xaattar was takwa 11;) by thri: Steam to tha Apéx Cmm. but the: apyeal was 93130 dismhs’w by the Ap€x Court uphnlding fhe. dttciskm 01” thf‘ Tribunal $0 mi: gfilect mat ma TfiachsarsfAssisiémt TaachérS am €ntit‘i6ii for mguiar pay scale from thg data of théir i—niijal apgmintmsmt‘ 1’ ‘ in viaw 0f Thai abova submisssioxi made by fzm cmmse1 for rims yarties, fmi petition is di$poseéi of in the. saum terms £6. fhe yati‘tiogér is grmitacl Eibarty m makri. a mprssentaiicu, if so advkedl in thi: light of the, aforesaif} judgmeni and the circukar damd '27, 12.2008 {Annaxur and in its pamgaectiv& if the. cmmidsr their case on §f£s own mairits r arckx paasm} by the e P! ’2) amd in turn, the ccncsmfx‘x raspomirmt 3s dimctsd “{o pafj‘jone? stands on the Samé foming as p6: tha Suprame. Cauri in Sipacial Leavs: suBS€quent1y confirmsci by may b3 antitied t0 same, rdiaf accordingly. it is exyecmd fmm the Stak author-iiies EO paw sui‘aabic: ordar aftsr dua scrutiny of tbs factesg it is made Ciear that this court has am. gxpressad anv opinion on the mErits' 0f the casr: ami the authoriw concemiit wauld b6 at Eberfy t0 (iecide fhe repmsentatiox: Stxictly in acmrdanca with law. State Ac'iministrawlet Txibunal m Madhukam Yadu [Su'greq gn‘d E’amion {Civil} NO. 6892[93 by ordsr dazed. 03.01.95, Ema ygiitmmer Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge