IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI WRIT PETITION NO : 5981 of 1995 Between: 1 Qutub Unnisa Begam, w/o Waheb, aged 41 years, House hold, R/o Humayun Nagar,Hyderabad. 2 Khairunnisa Begum, W/o Rasheemuddin Khan, aged about 71 years, House wife, Khana Bagh,Khurshid Jha Palace, Sha gunj,Hyderabad. 3 Mohammed Basheer Uddin Faruqui, S/o Rasheemuddin, aged 53 years, r/o Khana Bagh,Khurshid Jha Palace, Sha Gunj,Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Chief secretary, Secretariat building,Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Rangareddy Dist, Hyderabad. 3 The Revenue Divisional , Chevella Division, Rangareddy Dist, Hyderabad. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Seri Lingampally Mandal, Rangareddy Dist,Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the petitioners’ peaceful possession and enjoyment over an extent of Acs.39-08 gts of land in Sy.No.79/1 and 79/2 of Hafizpet village, Seri Lingampalli Mandal, Ranga Reddy District contrary to the judgment and decree dt.8-6-63 in C.S.No.14/58, orders dated 31-1-1976 and 10-8-84 in Application No 139/71 in C.S. No.14/58, order in Application No. 114/73 dated 5-7-74, in C.S.No.14/58, order dated 18-12-83, made in Application No. 44/84 in C.S.No 14/58 of this Hon'ble court and the Proceedings of the Receiver-cum-Commissioner dated 27/28-11-1984 in the said suit evidencing delivery of possession of the schedule land to the petitioners as arbitrary, illegal, unjust without jurisdiction violative of fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed to us under Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India respectively and also violative of principle of natural justice and issue a consequential direction to the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners’ peaceful possession and enjoyment over the above said land and pass such other or further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.N.V.S.J.RAMA RAO (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Nobody appeared on 19-08-2004 when the case was called. Therefore, the case was ordered to be listed today for dismissal. Today also nobody appeared. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-appearance and non-prosecution. No order as to costs. ____________ (Bilal Nazki.J) vs/ys To 1 The Chief Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat building,Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Rangareddy Dist, Hyderabad. 3 The Revenue Divisional , Chevella Division, Rangareddy Dist, Hyderabad. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Seri Lingampally Mandal, Rangareddy Dist,Hyderabad. 5 Two CCs to the G.P for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad(O.U.T). 6 Two CD copies.