IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 8TH AUGUST 2008 / 17TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 35508 of 2005(B) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- MR.T.C.FRANCIS,THANNIPPARA HOUSE, VAZHOOR,CHANGANACHERRY. BY ADV. SRI.JOMY GEORGE RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. CHANGANACHERRY MUNICIPALITY,REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,MUNICIPAL OFFICE, CHANGANACHERRY. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR POF POLICE, CHANGANACHEERY. 3. NOUFAL,KARANGDAPARAMBIL,VANTIPETTA, CHANGANACHERRY. 4. SHERRY,THUDHIPARAMBIL CHANGANACHERRY. ADV. SRI.V.K.SUNIL FOR R3 SRI.SIBY MATHEW FOR R1 SRI.A.A.MOHAMMED NAZIR FOR R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED ANZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.35508/2005 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE FEES RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF MUNICIPAL TAX DT. 26.2.04. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE SALES TAX REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE SALES TAX AUTHORITIES FOR THE BUSINESS OF THE PETITIONER DT. 7.6.00. EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT DT. 18.8.05. EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT. 18.8.05. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE tss KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.35508 of 2005 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 8th August, 2008. J U D G M E N T The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayers :- “(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take action against the respondents 3 and 4 for their illegal unauthorized business that is being conducted in front of the petitioner's shop. (ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take action on Exts.P3 and P4 complaints filed by the petitioner within a time limit fixed by this Hon'ble court.” In case the petitioner has still any grievance left, he may produce a copy of this judgment before the first respondent, in which case, appropriate action in accordance with law on Exts.P3 and P4 will be taken by the Municipality with notice to the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4 within another two months. If any request is made by the first respondent before the second respondent, the second respondent will render necessary assistance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.35508 of 2005 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 8th August, 2008.