CRP 348/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Mr. J. Ahmed, learned counsel, for the petitioner, who is defendan t No.7 in Title Suit No.300/2009 pending in the Court of learned Munsiff No.1, B arpeta. On the ground that the petitioner, as defendant No.7, had received summo ns, but had not appeared, an order was passed, on 04.01.2010, teating the summon s, issued to the present petitioner, as defendant No.7 in the suit, served. By o rder, dated 04.01.2010, the Court also directed that the suit shall proceede ex parte against, amongst others, the present petitioner. By an application, dated 12.03.2010, the petitioner applied for vacating the order, dated 04.01.2010, and also sought for a chance to submit written statement on the ground that summons had not been served on her. By order, dated 12.03.2010, the learned Court below allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition on the ground that the petition , made under Order IX Rule 13 for the purpose of setting aside the earlier order , dated 04.01.2010, was not maintainable. The petitioner, then, made an applicat ion, on 07.04.2010, renewing her prayer to get the order, dated 04.01.2010, vaca ted and to enable her to file written statement. When this petition was taken up for order on 29.04.2010, the petitioner as well as her counsel were absent. The learned Court below, therefore, rejected the petition. Aggrieved by the order, dated 29.04.2010, the petitioner has filed this revision. When this revision was taken up for motion-hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that absence of the petitioner and her counsel, on 29.04. 2010, was not deliberate. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that t he petitioner seeks to withdraw this revision with liberty to file appropriate a pplication in the learned trial Court seeking to get the order, dated 29.04.2010 , as well as the order, dated 04.01.2010, vacated so that the petitioner can fil e her written statement and contest the suit. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, this revi sion is disposed of on being withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty granted to her file appropriate petition in the learned Court below in order to get the or ders, dated 29.04.2010 and 04.01.2010, vacated and also to enable her to file he r written statement. If such petitions are filed, the learned Court below shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law. The revision shall stand disposed of in terms of the above observations and dire ctions.