:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1007 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.1007 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.1007 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.622 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.622 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.622 OF 2006 Raju Ramvishal Chamar ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Ms.M.U.Inamdar for the Applicant. Mr.A.R.Patil,A.P.P.for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,JJ. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,JJ. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 12TH OCTOBER,2007. : 12TH OCTOBER,2007. : 12TH OCTOBER,2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the Trial Court Judgment. This Application has been preferred by Accused No.1. The learned Judge, after considering the evidence, has clearly came to a conclusion that there were two extra judicial confessions and also that P.W.No.4 Raju Patel and P.W.No.5 Chand Hafiz Mohd. have stated that both of them had last seen Accused No.1 with deceased. Over and above, Medical opinion is, it is a homicidal death. The weapon knife and clothes were recovered at the instance of Accused NO.1. The evidence of the girl-friend of deceased being P.W.No.8 Salma is also against the accused. Under these facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to grant bail in the above. :2: 2. However, having regard to the age of the accused, we are inclined to expedite the hearing of the above Appeal. Hence, the hearing of the above Appeal is expedited. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)