IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 342 of 2006 (S/B) Harshendra Kumar Singh and another ….…… Petitioners Versus Union of India and others ………. Respondents Mr. Manoj Tiwari, Senior Advocate with Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Anjali Bhargawa, Standing Counsel for the Union of India / respondent Nos. 1 and 5. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Date of Judgment: 24.03.2011 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (ORAL) The writ petition seeks to challenge the final allocation order passed by the Central Government on 31st October, 2006, on the ground that the said order is contrary to the guidelines issued by the Central Government for the purpose of allocating employees of the State of Uttar Pradesh to the State of Uttarakhand and also on the ground that the said allocation order purports to allocate more persons than the posts are available. In order words, petitioner seeks to interfere with allocation of many people made by that order, but behind their back as none of them has been made a party to the writ petition. 2. On that ground alone, we are dismissing this writ petition. This order shall not prevent the petitioner to take such recourse to law as they may be advised. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 24.03.2011 24.03.2011 Amit