wwww^ W. PLtSI N0. 'WWtttSW Petitkmer Versus Respondents ;1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Sahu,agedab«*37S f 'KAssistanf Teacher, Gevt. Middle Schod, Gondpaia, Abhanpur, Distt.-Ralpw (C.G-) The Seeretary DepafteieiA of Educaden, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipw (C-G^ Educafion OBieer, iyiahasamund(C.G.). Distt. EdueafonOfffew, Raipur (p-®-)^ Block EchBriKm otBcer, Abhanpur; FteipurC.G. BtockEducattonCTRcer, Bagbahara; Raipur (C.G.) ¥^ SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agniht^i, J Present Mr.SomtentVerma.AdvocatelbrBwpefitiMW. Mr. Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advecrto ftw tha respomlents/Stato. ORDER (Passed on this 12tn Day of htoroh, 2007) 1. The petitioner was appoinled on 6.7.95 ^/t) as Asslshmt T^ahw on fhMt pay scate of Rs. 120G/-. After congrietkm of two yeais probattorr, he was grantBd regular pay scate of Rs. 1200-264Q^. 2. L^imed counsel s^p« lRg for Ui&prtiBener submte ttiat tt»e issue Invohwd In the c^e js asto wh^ier, B»p^i^ier is wtfttod ta legular (^ scate w.a.f. the date rf inltial appolntmeid or Irom ttie <fato o( completion ofprobationperiod. 3. The issue invohwd, twrein was considered ty ttie Kladh^ Pradesh State AdministrativB Tribunal, Jabalpur in OA No.274S89 pladhutanit Yadu antf % others \fe. State tf M.P. & others). wtreFain Swas hstt that the amtlariy sttuated teaehas are? enBBett to regularpay scato sa H ?- w.aS. ^<tetotft(^afrapp<*9ftBwrt.'Thfc5mattBKWM;t9l(eB^i»ti»E Hon'blB Suprenre Ceurt m Sperorf iAaw RaWoft ^iw^ No. 9883SQ The sakl psfitton was (Ssmissad ^f the HwiWe Si^lwme Couit UfrfioUlng tti® dwision of the Tilbunrt to tt»^^Kcfr ttat tto Teacharsft^sytant TeachiBrs iare anBBatfta regidar psy sratoftom (tate of iniUat ajqaointmCTt 4. Leamed counsd appearing fer th®peUficnw <uift»ersubffats at tWs Court, wtdte consictering the same 'issae In Aemat Jaiii vs; The Sferte Govemment crfChtatUsflarh & anttffaer (W. P. Ne. 1483@@06) by oider dated 10.11.2006, hasgrantedregularpayscatew.e.f.ttie^ateatliuliri appointment. 5. Leamedcounsetappa^ngfM'ttia |Bartfesjoln^subi»tt1tettttfecase is s^uarely covered by ths decision of this Csa^ In the cwe o? AsBKm Jain vs, TheStatBG<wemmentofChhatB^arh&anotheF(Stipia). 6. In viewofttiat, this peUtion is diqiosed <rf<B tha same terans. No entor astocosts. -—/— - - Sd/- SatishK.Agnihota Judge v-\ .1