[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 337/2008 SUKHPAL Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN DATE: 05/05/2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. C.P. Meena for Mr. N.A. Naqvi for the accused-petitioner. Mr. B.S. Chhaba, Public Prosecutor for the State. **** The present criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 31.03.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Beawar, District Ajmer in Sessions Case No. 17/2007, by which the Court below has allowed the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. and taken the carbon copy of the prosecution documents on record. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. with the request to take the carbon copy of two letters on record and permit to mark exhibits on the same. The petitioner filed reply to the aforesaid application filed by the prosecution and submitted that both the letters are forged documents and, therefore, prayed that the application filed by the prosecution under Section 311 Cr.P.C. be dismissed, but the same has been allowed by the trial Court vide order impugned [2] dated 31.03.2008 and the documents have been taken on record. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid order dated 31.03.2008, the accused- petitioner has preferred the instant criminal revision petition. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the documents which are allowed to be taken on record are forged and the same are not essentially required for just decision of the case. I have heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the order impugned dated 31.03.2008. The trial Court while allowing the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. filed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, has observed that the documents which are submitted along with the application, are prima-facie not appeared to be forged and if the same are allowed to be taken on record, no prejudice will be caused to the petitioner but the same will be helpful for just decision of the case and accordingly, the trial Court allowed the application filed by the prosecution under Section 311 Cr.P.C. vide order impugned dated 31.03.2008 and the documents were allowed to be taken on record. Upon careful perusal of the order impugned dated 31.03.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions [3] Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Beawar, District Ajmer, I find no illegality or error apparent on the face of the record which requires any interference whatsoever by this Court. Consequently, the criminal revision petition fails being devoid of merit and the same is hereby dismissed. The stay application also stands dismissed. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/ (Reserved)