'NLTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISQARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petifcion No, PETITIONER EESPONDEWTS 2004 / Oovfald Narayan Rao Aadewar, S/ o Late Sbri Narayan Rao Andewar, aged. about 56 years, Workiiig as Deputy Director, Sericiilture R/ o Plot No. 85'7, Sunder Nagar Colony, Rmg Road No. l Raipur (C.G.} Versus- 1. StateofChliattisgarh, Through Special Secretary, Departnient of Rural Industry, Mantralaya, Shastri Chowk, Raipur (C.G.J. Director, Directorate of Rural Industrial Sericulture Sector, Sona Khan Bhawan, Te'iiban.dha, King Road, Raipur (C.G,). WRITPETITION UNDERABTICLE 226 OP THE CON8TITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OP A WRIT OF CERTIORARI. MANDA3UUS OE ANY_OTHER_ WRIT OR DIRECTION TO DO JU8TICE IN THE MATTER. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BUASPUR Writ Ptetition No. 1915 of2QQ4 Petitioner Goviad Narayan Rao Andewar Veisus Respoiidents State of Chhattisgarh and another Siagle Bencb : Hon'bte Mr. Justfce SaUsh K. AgnUiotri. Shri Prashaat Jayaswal, Seiiior Advocate wifh Shri AB. Asgar, Advocate fqr ttie pctitioner. Shri V. V. S. Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General for fhe rcspondents No. l and 2. Shri Pradeep Saxeiia, Advocate for fhc Intervener. Shri J. K. Shastri, Advocate for the Intervcner Shri K. R. Sahu. ORAL ORDER (6th April, 2006) The foUowiug onlcr of the Court was passed by Satish K. Affdliotri, J. 1. The petitioncr -was appointed as Senior SericultUBe Inspector ia fhe Industries Department vide order dated 10.1.1975 (Anncxure P/2) in the categoiy of Scheduled Tribc on fhc basis of the caste ccrdficate produced by the petitioncr that he bdongs to 'hatba' tribe. a~ 2. Some complauits were made to tfae Govenunent against scveral persons, iacludmg the petitioner, that they have bcen appointed on the basis offalse caste certificates, produced by thcin. On the basis of the said complamts, fhe State Govenunent by tetter dated 22.6.2004 (Annexure P/9) directed aB the con(xmed officeis, aot to consxler the cases of such candidates, against whom conaplaiats with regaid to false caste certificate is pending, for proiaotion to fhe higher post 3. Thc petitioner has fited ttus petition pBaying that thc pendiag enquuy, the petitkiner has acquired right to be considered for pronuotion to the iRrgg^ i;;,.A.iii.jiaan : highcr posfc At this stage the petitioner secks permissiou of fhfa Court to withdraw ttiis pctition wifh tiberty to question fhe action of the State Govermaent as and when occasion arises. It is further submitted that the State Govemment be directed to conchuie the enquiry as earty as possible bccause fhe pctitk>ner is being deprived of his right for consideratfon to promotion. 4. In view of fhe foregoing, ttus petitfon is dismissed as wifhdrawn, reserviag Uberly to the petitioner to take appropriate steps as aad whea cause of action arises. The Respoiident/State is directed to complete ttie enquiry, as earty as possible, prefeiabty within a period of three inonths firem the date of receipt of a copy of tihis order, as fhe impugned order was p^sed on 22.6.2004, directing fhe conccmed ofBcers not to consider fhe cascs of those caadidates against whom coinplauits wifh. regard to false caste certificate is pending. 5. No order as to costs. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge I'aakuT ^BSSS^S