IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 15TH JANUARY 2008 / 25TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 35231 of 2007(T) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- C.SIVAKUMAR, S/O. CHAMI MANNADIAR, SIVA NIVAS, COYALMANNAM P.O., ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.M.R.SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- W.P.(C) NO.35231 OF 2007-T APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN MVARP NO.99/07 DT.14.5.2007 EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DT.30.5.2007 PRODUCING EXT.P1 JUDGMENT BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. / TRUE COPY / ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 35231 of 2007 ------------------------------------- Dated: January 15, 2008 JUDGMENT Ext.P1 order of the STAT shows that the matter was remitted back to the respondent for convening a fresh timing conference. The complaint of the petitioner is that till date, timing conference has not been convened. 2. In view of Ext.P1, there is absolutely no justification for delaying the timing conference. Therefore, I direct the respondent to convene a timing conference as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-