IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 16152 of 2001 Between: K. Abdul Azeez S/o Late Abdul Majeed R/o 3/106, Alur Village and Mandal, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Additional Secretary Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent Engineer, Operation Circle, A.P.C.P.D.C. Limited Kurnool. 3 K. Khaja Hussain S/o Late Abdul Majeed R/o Adoni, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to i) declare the Proceedings in Lr.No.SE/O/KNL/PO/Adm/S3/D.No.2752/2000, dated 7th December, 2000 issued by the 2nd Respondent herein as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and pass such other order or orders. ii) declare the proceedings DS(Estt)AS/(Pen)/PO-V(R D)/581/95, dated 1st November, 2000 as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondent herein to consider the case of the petitioner herein his appointment on compassionate basis in any suitabel posts in the 1st Respondent company by issuing by appropriate writ, order or direction, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.V.S.SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.S.RAVINDRANATH The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner filed this Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking to declare the proceedings in Lr. No.SE/O/KNL/PO/ADM/S3/D.No.2752/2000, dated 07.12.2000 issued by respondent No.2 as illegal, arbitrary and to declare the proceedings DS(Estt)AS/(Pen)/PO-V(RD)/581/95, dated 01.11.2000 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, represents that the petitioner herein is not pressing the writ petition and he requests to permit him to withdraw the same. 3. In view of the representation made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, permission is accorded to withdraw the Writ Petition. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. _________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J July 27, 2009 KSH