MC 1296/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. SARMA Heard Ms. B. Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.K. Nandi, learne d counsel for the respondents. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the origina l judgment passed in the Civil Rule, I am of the view that there were inadverten t errors as pointed by the learned counsel for the parties in the original judgm ent dated 11.3.2010. Accordingly it is ordered as follows : a) In paragraph 3 of the original judgment at line No. 10 instead of ’July, 200 6’ it should be read as ’July, 2000’. b) In paragraph 4 at line No. 3 instead of the word ’original revival’, it shoul d be read as ’ordinary revival’. Similarly in sub- paragraph of paragraph 4 inst ead of the word ’original revival’ it should be read as ’ordinary revival’. In p aragraph 11 at line No. 10 instead of the word ’ pansem’ it should be read as ’p artem’. This order shall form a part of the original order dated 11.3.2010. Misc. Case disposed of.