1 4555.199CA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4555 OF 1999 IN SECOND APPEAL No.77 OF 1999 Syed Nawab S/o Syed Abdul Quadar & another .. APPLICANTS VERSUS Syed Shahed S/o Syed Osman Ali ...RESPONDENT ... Mrs. M.A. Kulkarni, Advocate for the applicant CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 20h December, 2010. PER COURT : This is an application seeking review of the Judgment and order passed by this Court 24-02-1999, dismissing the Second Appeal. Mrs. Kulkarni, learned Counsel submits that while passing the Judgment and Order in the said Second Appeal this Court did not take into consideration the fact that the mutation entry was not 2 4555.199CA challenged for ten years. This Court also did not take into consideration the fact that the receipt was also produced on record. 2. The powers of this Court under Section 114 read with Order 47 of the Civil Procedure Code is in a very narrow campus. This Court cannot sit as an appellate authority over the orders passed by this Court, while exercising its review jurisdiction. This Court vide order dated 24-02-1999 has discussed in detail the documents at Exh. 34 and 35, so also both the Courts below have evaluated the evidence. 3. In that light of the matter, there is no error apparent on face of record. As such the Civil Application is rejected. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE SDM*