C§<\®V/ E‘ » IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(CHHATTISGARH) ,H Ml WRIT PETITION mo. 3 2003 PETITIONER Kanhaiyalal Patel, S/‘o. Late shri Raj Kumar Patel VAged 55' yealm, ,4” Occupation - $erviae'. Presently posted as Sub-Divl. Hasdeo Left Bank Canal. Sub-Eivision No. 5; 0£ficer, Sakti, Dist.Janjgir-Champa (c .G .) VS. RESPONDENT State of Chhattisgarh, / Through Secretary. / Deartment o£ Water Resources. Mntralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, 1/ Raipvlr (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF/;'}E CGNS’I‘I'I‘UTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MNDAMUS AND FOR OTE‘ER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS. / / f , / a p The e‘d‘iioner i3 avarievad tab ; bV ~ 811 order 0f sus 3611$10n dated 9; 12/2002. State counSel submits tha: the order impugned is appeaabk under Rule 23- of the MP. Civil Sérvices ( ilassiiication, Central and Appéal) Ruies, 1966 and the petitionex‘ has not preferred the appeal. Having considered the facts and circumetaimes of the caSe and material on record, it ie directed that the petitioner may prefer an appeal Within ten days and if Such an appeal is preferred the same shell be ecided as early as poselble yreferéhly Within a perled of o1 e month from the date of the preductlon it. The petitiener, required, may be heard. If ll} adverse Greer is passed r the appeal is not decided a 3?;ggm ‘ WW$ (WE?) gg‘wx 13953m ! %Wwh%u$1if§{ ‘u‘agrz \ ‘21 4/2003 ' Shri Mamindra ShrivaStava’ for the petitioner, Shri RS. Koshy, Govt. Achiroca'tes for the State. Heard. ispUSsd of. x; \. d ConsequgnUy, M.W.P. Noé21/03 and LA No.612/03 I)( temd diS‘posed of. :E/V yetitioner may f11e the petition a1 reSh’ With the aforesaid obse Nations , this etition p 1S Ceriifled copy as per ruleS. XI-HC~78 3aW, Wm, 'FEWWEI W 29$ amm (Wawg) 3m mm awm &W¢Ir3r7 Wmm § 2._ W %W 31W ’Em W 11W