? HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARI—I, BELASPUR W.P. (S) No. 7562 of 2007 PETITIONER Hiralal Yadav, s/o Late Ganssh Yadav, aged about . 59 years, Permamant GaJagmaJl, Viiiage Bortalao, P.O. Chirchari, RS. Bhaghnadi, Dis’m'ct Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS. '1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretaxy, Depaxtment of Public Works, D.K.S. BhavaJl, Raipur {c.G.) Sub—Divisionai Ojiica, Nationai Highway, Sub ‘ Division - RajnandgaonDistrict Rajnagldgaon {c.G). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF {NDIA éppearance: Ms. Sunita Jain, Advocate, appears on behalfofShn‘ Anoop Majumdar, Counsel for me petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer, for the State} respondents on advance copy. ‘ oRAL ORDER (20.12.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard. Learned‘ counsel for the petitioner submits that a permanent Gang-man is to be retired at the age of 62 years m accordance with the Chhatzisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam 1967' read with Fundamental Rules, 56. He also submits that the point raised has been decided by this Court in batch of matters i.e. WP. No. 108] 2005 and many other connected matters on 04.01.2007, reported in 2007 (2) C.G.L.J. 29 (Goutnd & Others vs. State of C.G. and others} and this matter is squareiy covered by that decision, which may be disposed of on the same terms. Q ounsel for the State fairly agrees that this However. hc submits Leaxnec'i C matter 1s covered by the sald dec1smn matters the btate has flied wmt appeals Unless some mtenm order 1s passe‘i merely on that 1n some accouxxt n cannot when the matter 1s squarely covered bV the be kept 1n abeyance, sald Judgment in the result th1s pennon 1s allowedW passed m WP. No.108/ 200:) and other co order as to cost. of fmng of The wnt appeal hearmg oi th1s Wnt petmo dated O4 01.2007 It 1s drsposed of 1n terms of the order V Sdl- : Sunil Kumar Sinha udge Rae J