THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO.1625 OF 2006 Between: The Urban Huts Slum Dweller Development Association. … petitioner. AND The District Collector, Ranga Reddy And others. … Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO.1625 OF 2006 ORDER Petitioner is an association of persons comprising of the beneficiaries of assigned land in R.S.No.58 of Fathullaguda village, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy district. It is stated that the members of the petitioner association made applications for assignment of outside pattas in Survey No.58 of Fathullaguda village of Uppal Mandal, but the said process of granting assignment has not been completed and therefore, to complete the said process petitioners filed W.P.No.14377 of 2001 on the file of this Court which was disposed of on 3.9.2001 directing the District Collector Ranga Reddy and the Mandal Revenue Officer, Uppal to complete the process of granting assignment and accordingly issue pattas to all those beneficiaries who are found to be eligible for such assignment and accordingly put them in possession as expeditiously as possible within four weeks from the date receipt of the said order. It is stated that the unofficial respondents 5 to 8 filed a petition under Section 87 of A.P. Telangana Area Land Revenue Act 1317 Fasli before the second respondent, District Revenue Officer, Ranga Reddy district, which is pending in file No.A1/279/98. As the pendency of the said case is coming in the way of petitioner association for assignment of pattas, the petitioner association wanted to implead itself and accordingly, filed a petition before the District Revenue Officer, Ranga Reddy District on 2.11.2004. It is stated that no orders have been passed on the said implead petition, impleading the petitioner herein as second respondent. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing that if the proceedings in file No.A2/279/98 are pending on the file of the second respondent, the second respondent may consider and dispose of the implead petition, if any, filed by the petitioner, after giving an opportunity to the petitioner as well as to all the respective parties and pass appropriate orders on the implead petition within six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. ____________ 03.03.2006 mdaa.