IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 316 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 316 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 316 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 879 OF 2004 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 879 OF 2004 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 879 OF 2004 Babulal Maganlal Shah & Anr. ...Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.I.V. Rao for the Petitioners. Ms.Poonam Tahaliyani holding for Advocate Raja Thakare for Respondent Nos.2 and 4. Mr.Y.S. Shinde, APP for State. Mr.M.P.S. Rao, Advocate-Mediator present. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : AUGUST 9, 2007 DATED : AUGUST 9, 2007 DATED : AUGUST 9, 2007 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- . The learned Counsel for the parties state that the parties have settled the matter and are filing the Consent Minutes of Order which are signed by the parties and their respective Advocates. Consent Minutes are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Undertaking given in paras 5 and 7 by the parties in the Minutes is accepted. In para 7 of the said Minutes of Order, the petitioners and the respondent nos.2 and 4 have given an undertaking that they will withdraw all proceedings filed by them against each other in various - 2 - courts simultaneously. . In view of the undertaking, the Criminal Writ Petition is allowed. In the result, Case No. 471/s of 2002 pending before the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade, Mumbai, under Section 482 is quashed. The process issued in the said complaint is also quashed. . In view of this, filing of the report by the Mediator is dispensed with. . Writ petition is allowed in view of the consent terms filed by the parties. (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)