IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12003 of 2010 1. RAJEEV RANJAN KUMAR SINGH , SON OF PRYAGDEO SINGH 2. GUPTESHWAR ROY 3. HARI SEWAK ROY BOTH SONS OF SRI JANARDAN ROY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the Informant and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 120B, 467, 471 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the nature of dispute between the parties which is completely based on documents and claim and counter claim, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody since 16.3.2010 and have no criminal antecedents, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Patna, in Complaint Case No. 1157 (C) of 2009, Tr. No. 3043 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will - 2 - inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)