FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION NO.157 OF 2006 PETITION NO.157 OF 2006 PETITION NO.157 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1677 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1677 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1677 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Vishwas S. Deokar with Laxman N. Bedekar for the petitioner. Shri Jadhav i/b Nitin Jamdar for Respondent no.1. Shri C.R.Sonawane for Respdt.no.2 CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; A.P.DESHPANDE, & A.P.DESHPANDE, & A.P.DESHPANDE, & D.G. D.G. D.G. KARNIK, JJ. KARNIK, JJ. KARNIK, JJ. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 26TH FEBRUARY, 2007 26TH FEBRUARY, 2007 26TH FEBRUARY, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. No case is made out for review of the impugned order. Hence Review Petition is rejected. At this stage the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to approach the School Tribunal calling in question the legality of the order of termination. The petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the School Tribunal and the Tribunal shall decide all the questions on its own merit and in accordance with law. ...