IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20977 of 2009 VINAY PRASAD RASTOGI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07.08.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking bail in a case instituted under sections 366 and 366-A/34 IPC. The allegation is that the minor girl of the informant was kidnapped/abducted by the petitioner’s younger brother, namely, Jitendra Prsasd Rastogi. The informant has named the aforesaid boy along with all other family members including brother, mother and sister. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the mother and sister of the petitioner have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court on 6.8.2009, passed in Cr.Misc.No.22375 of 2009. By filing a supplementary affidavit, it has been stated that the informant has realized his mistake in implicating the family members of the petitioner under misconception. It has further been stated that both the parties have resolved their differences. A copy of the compromise petition has been enclosed and marked as Annexure-2. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner abovenamed be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Chapra, Saran, in connection with Ekma P.S.Case No. 32 of 2009. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )