‘ : Pkash aishnv 0 unra - Vahnv, ae bout 5 a sisa Teachr Gt Mide Schol Grla e ovemmen dl o u Dot Bl tpra stric eveEpmen ock Bhaaa Dit Rapur (CG VERSUS ‘RESPONDENTS st hgar uh he : 1. The ate of Chattish, throg t Sy Dar f Edn‘ Ds ecretar, eptment o ucatlo, ;K.. Bhawan,alr(CG , Distri Educati Ofce, Ralpur, Dir Raipu(c6). 3. lck Edtio iir vlopen Bo ucan Otca, Deemt Bck'Bhatapara, Disrc Raipur (ca). v WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF I£DIA SB: Hun’ble Shi‘i Satish K. Agnihdrl J. Present: Shri A K Prasad Advocate for the petitioner shri Arvind Dobey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents ORAL ORDER (Passed on 15th day of April, 2009) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is heard finally. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submlts that the petitioner is entitled to grant of two increments as she has obtained D.Ed; certificate on his own expenses during the service period. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner may be ganted liberty to make a representation to the authorities tor grant of two increments pursuant to the judgment and order passed rby this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj v. Municipal Corporation, Burg and anomerl and Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The .StaterGovt. of Chhattisgam and another2. ’ 1 2606 (II) MPJR CG 96 2 WP (S) No.4130 0t 2005 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1395 0f 2009 “PETITIONER ,_ Om ra Va, 5/ Late Sdads ' isa gd a 3 yms, Astnt l ) Rpu). ct on fir stict r lo tit 3. .The state Govemment is under an obligatlon to foliow the law setfled by this Court and rt is not necessary to approach this court by each and evety employee when the law has already been settled by this Court. The employees, who are similarly situated and have not approached the Court, may be treated at par with other employees, who have approached this Court. It is not necessary to approach this Court for similar order. A In View of the ‘l'oregoing reasons, mls petition studs dismed of with liberty reserved to the petitioner, on the request o1 leamod counsel. to make a representation. if the representation is tiled by the petitioner, the same may be considered and decided, in accordance with law on its own merit as expeditiously-as possible, preferably within a period of eigit weeks from the date of receipt of the epresenton subje‘ a herfas rati, ctto verifiction of tct.