IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.939 of 2006 PURSHOTTAM KUMAR Versus SRI DEEPAK KUMAR & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner : None. For the Opposite party no.6 : Mr. V.R.P. Singh, Advocate For the Opposite party nos. 1to 5 and 7 : Mr. Rajesh Kumar No. 2, G.P. 19 ------ P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal --------- Dated, the 24th July, 2008. None appears for the petitioner. 2. On 10th January, 2006, the writ petition filed by the petitioner came to be disposed of by the following operative order – “Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, respondent no. 5 is directed to pay the admissible salary to the petitioner, as enumerated in paragraph 1 of the writ application, in case no proceeding whatsoever is pending against him within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.” 3. The Government counsel as well as counsel for the Opposite party no. 6 submits that the order dated 10th January, 2006 has been fully complied with and the payment of admissible salary has been made to the petitioner. 4. Paragraph 18 of the show-cause filed by respondent no. 6 reads thus : - 2 - “That besides above, a proceeding set up by Dr. B.P. Singh, the then in-charge District Anti-Leprosy Officer, Banka through his letter no. 130 dated 04.07.2001 for payment of salary to the petitioner from June, 2001 and July, 2001 is pending consideration.” 5. In supplementary show -cause filed by the Opposite party no. 3, it is stated that the entire amount has been paid to the petitioner on 21.12.2006. Annexure – D has been annexed along with the supplementary show-cause in support thereof. 6. We are, thus, satisfied that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. No further action in this M.J.C. is required. It is disposed of accordingly. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J. Anil/