THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4963 OF 2011 01.12.2011 Between: Pydikonda Appa Rao …Petitioner AND Pydikonda Veeraswamy (died) And others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4963 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner herein instituted O.S.No.295 of 2006 on the ﬁle of the Court of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada. The suit is for partition and his three brothers were arrayed as defendants 1, 3 and 4. During pendency of the suit, the ﬁrst defendant Pydikondala Veeraswamy, the younger brother of the petitioner, died. The petitioner ﬁled application to bring Legal Representatives (LRs) of deceased ﬁrst defendant. As there was a delay, they ﬁled I.A.No.1670 of 2010 seeking condonation of delay of 1352 days in ﬁling a petition to bring the LRs on record. The same was dismissed by the trial Court on 20.09.2011. Aggrieved by which, the present civil revision petition is filed. In his application for condonation of delay, the petitioner alleged that as there are disputes between him and his brothers, he could not know the death of the ﬁrst respondent and as such he could not bring it to the notice of the advocates. Dealing with this aspect, the Court below observed that it is highly improbable that the plaintiﬀ could not know the death of his own brother as both of them have common relatives. This only shows that the petitioner approached the Court making allegations which are highly improbable and abnormal. In such an event, it cannot be said that he has shown suﬃcient cause for exercising discretion under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. This Court has perused the impugned order. Though the method of extracting citations is something to be desired, on merits this Court does not ﬁnd any reason to interfere with the order. The civil revision petition fails and is accordingly dismissed with costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 01.12.2011 Pln