HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.p.No. 737(2005 PETITIONER Rakesh Kumar Agrawal, S/o‘ Late Shri Kedar Nath Agrawal, Aged aboutgl29 years, R/‘o. Cfo. Alka Lodge, Near’Bus‘ Stand, Patmalgaon, District Jashpur Nagar (CG) Vs. RESPONDENT$ Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Raipur, Through its Secretaly, Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ISB: Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. égihotri, J.) Shri P.Diwakar, Sr. Advocate with Shri P.K.Bhaduri, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Abhishek Sinha, counsel for the respondent. AORDER {Passed on this 15m day of November 2007) 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction to the respondent to re—value the answer papers of Public Service Commission (State Civil Services Examination 2003) ofall the seven subjects by some independent valuer. 2. Admittedly, there is no provision for re-evaiuation of the answer sheets in a competitive examination conducted by the respondent; CommissiOn. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though there is no provision for revaluation but on the basis \N of equity’ case of the petitioner be considered. / / \-_ Be that as it may, the Supreme Court in the matter of Pramod Kumar Shriuastaua Vs. Chairman Bihar Public M Service Commission Patna and Others repomed in (2004! 6 SCC 714, has settlsd, thf; legal position “that in absence of a' speciiic provision confern'ng a right upon an examinee'to have his answer-books re—evaiuated, no such direction can be issued. There is no dispute that under the relevant rule of the Commission there is no provision entitling a candidate to have his answer—books re—evaluated.” For the reasons mentioned hereinabove, this petition is not tenable and deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, it is dismissed. No orders as to costs. M Satish K. Agniiwtri ' Judge ‘ ' Sdl-