IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 192 of 2011 Decided on: 1.6.2011 Nand Lal …Petitioner Versus P.C. Dhiman and another …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Imran Khan, Advocate vice Mr. S.D. Gill, Advocate. For the respondents : None. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The present petition has been filed without issuing notice to the respondents. In view of this, Mr. Imran Khan, learned vice counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition in order to serve the notice upon the respondents. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having been withdrawn. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge June 1, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?