HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 21st June, 2011 1st Bail Application No. 449 of 2011 Order on the bail application of the accused. Mahendra Singh S/o Kripal Singh ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In Case Crime No. 662 B of 2002 U/s 420, 468 and 471 I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali Almora District Almora Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Udyog Shukla, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. S.S. Adhikari, the learned A.G.A. for the State. The first information report reveals that the applicant had got himself registered in the Employment Exchange on the basis of forged certificates. In this regard, several co-accused, having a similar role, have already been enlarged on bail. One such order is dated 5th April, 2011 in 1st Bail Application No. 241 of 2011, Rupesh Kumar Vs. State of Uttarakhand. In the light of the aforesaid, the applicant is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the basis of parity. Consequently, Bail Application is allowed. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 662 B of 2002, U/s 420, 468 and 471 I.P.C. on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 21.06.2011 Shiv 2