CWP No.11243 of 2011 (O&M) Simran Kaur Sodhi and another V/s Union Territory, Chandigarh and another Present: Mr.Baljinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Sanjay Kaushal, Senior Standing Counsel for UT, Chandigarh with Mr.Ashish Rawal, Advocate. ***** Counsel for the petitioners submits that as the petitioners have obtained admission in a college in Punjab, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as infructuous. In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of as infructuous. Before parting with the order, it would be necessary to direct the Union Territory of Chandigarh, to re-consider the definition of a “Non Resident Indian candidate”. The definition as framed requiring parents and the grand-parents of a “Non Resident Indian candidate” to own immovable property in Chandigarh, may be violative of the constitutional guarantee of equality. 09.08.2011 [ RAJIVE BHALLA ] shamsher JUDGE