WP(C) 5774/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. Rahman, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Das, learned Standi ng Counsel, Education Department, Government of Assam. Having regard to the nature of the grievance expressed and the r elief sought for, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage. Accord ing to the petitioner, he is a selected candidate for promotion to the post of H eadmaster and by order dated 5/12/2009 of the Director of Elementary Education, Assam, he was promoted thereto and was posted in the said capacity at Paglahat M V School vice Shri Khagen Lal Sen (Retired). The petitioner has alleged that he having reported to the aforementioned school pursuant to the aforementioned orde r, the in-Charge Headmaster thereof did not handover charge of the office to him . He in the meantime, as a consequence of the order of promotion and posting, wa s released from his earlier School i.e. Saladanga Sr. Basic School so as to enab le him to join the new institution i.e. Paglahat MV School. However, as the in-c harge Headmaster of Paglahat MV School did not permit his access, he could not j oin. Being without any alternative, the petitioner on 8/12/2009 submitted a repr esentation before the Block Elementary Education Officer, Agomoni, expressing hi s above difficulty and sought for the remedial intervention of the said authorit y. As his representation remains unheeded as on date, he has turned to this Cour t. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties and on a consi deration of the averments made in the petition supported by an affidavit and als o on a scrutiny of the order of the petitioner’s promotion to the post of Headma ster and his posting at Paglahat MV School, this Court considers it appropriate to dispose of this petition with a direction to the Director of Elementary Educa tion, Assam, to take an appropriate decision on his representation at the earlie st. As the petitioner waits in expectation, the exercise as ordered should be co mpleted within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. While taking a decision on the petitioner’s representation, the s aid authority would also attend to his grievances vis-à-vis his pay for the inte rvening period. Needless to say that as the petitioner is favoured with an order of promotion and posting as above, it would be incumbent on the part of the afo rementioned State authority to ensure that the same is implemented in accordance with law and without fail if there is no other impediment in law.