IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.8471 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 12, 2011. Rajpal Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Hitesh Kaplish, Advocate, for Mr.S.S.Chatrath, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner joined the Revenue Department as Naib Tehsildar in the year 1998. It appears that his services were terminated on his conviction in a criminal case but upon his acquittal by the High Court, he has been re-instated in service on 24.8.2009. The petitioner's grievance is like that his service book is still incomplete and has not been updated due to which he is suffering a huge financial loss. The aforesaid grievance has been raised by the petitioner vide representation dated 10.1.2011 (Annexure P-6) also but no action appears to have been taken thereupon so far. CWP No.8471 of 2011 [2] In these circumstances, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's request regarding completion of the entries in his service book and grant of consequential benefits, if any, to which the petitioner might be entitled as per law. The needful shall be done within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 12, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE