1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3953 OF 2008 Maktum Ahmed Rehman Shaikh and Anr. .. Applicants. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr.V.V.Purwant for the applicants. Ms.A.T.Javeri A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 26TH NOVEMBER, 2008. DATED : 26TH NOVEMBER, 2008. DATED : 26TH NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in C.R.No.270 of 2007 of Fauzdar Chawadi police station, Solapur. The said crime has been registered against the applicants and 10 others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 302, 307, 143, 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 of IPC and section 25(4) of the Indian Arms Act and section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. 3. It is the prosecution case that on 27.10.2007 at 11.30 pm all the accused persons attacked the complainant, his father and others in which the 2 2 2 complainant sustained severe injuries to which he succumbed on 8.11.2007. Insofar as applicant nos.1 and 2 are concerned, they were holding sword and iron rod respectively at the relevant time and they allegedly assaulted the deceased. The deceased sustained 9-10 injuries and all appear to be serious in nature. Considering the statement of the complainant and the other eye witnesses and the nature of injuries sustained by the deceased and the witnesses I am not inclined to enlarge the applicants on bail. The application is rejected. The trial is expedited. . While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case without being influenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)