Crl. Misc. No. M-30763 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-30763 of 2011 Date of Decision : October 12, 2011 Avtar Singh .... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. H. S. Dhandi, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Avtar Singh has filed this petition under Section 438 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking multiple relief. The petitioner wants blanket anticipatory bail and also wants direction to police authorities – respondents no.2 and 3 not to use alleged blank signed papers taken by them from the petitioner for any purpose and to give seven days' prior notice to the petitioner, if he is required in any case. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the case file. From the averments and the documents annexed, it appears that Crl. Misc. No. M-30763 of 2011 2 private respondents no.5 and 6 have moved application Annexure P-1 to police authorities for taking action against the petitioner for committing fraud with them. The instant petition has been filed as a defence to the said application. The mere fact that the petitioner was called by the police authorities twice in connection with the aforesaid application would not entitle the petitioner to the relief sought for by him in the instant petition. No case for grant of blanket anticipatory bail to the petitioner is made out. The petition is completely misconceived and has been filed to only create defence for civil and criminal action being taken by respondents no.5 and 6 against the petitioner. For the reasons aforesaid, I find the present petition to be completely misconceived and meritless. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in limine. October 12, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE