IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 19TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 4449 of 2008(D) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SREENIVASAN RAJENDRAN, RESIDING AT KIZHAKKETHARASSERI VEEDU, THURUTHUMOOLA MURI, RANDAMADA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.L.MOHANAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. ARJUNAN DHANARAJAN @ SAMBAN, RESIDING AT THAMARASSERI VEEDU, THURUTHUMOOLA MURI, RANDAMADA VILLAGE. 2. ARJUNAN SURESH @ THAMPI, RESIDING AT DO. DO. 3. PARVATHI BHARGAVI, RESIDING AT ASHOK MANDIRAM, VAZHAYILA, PEROORKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. BHARGAVI INDIRA BAI, RESIDING AT DO. DO. 5. VASANTHAKUMARI GEETHADEVI @ SNEHALATHA, RESIDING AT DO. DO. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 4449 OF 2008 --------------------- Dated this the 8thday of February, 2008 JUDGMENT This writ petition is preferred against the order of the 2nd Additional District Judge, Thiruvananthapuram, in IA 735/06 in AS 55/98. The said application is filed to review the judgment in AS 55/98. The court below found that there is no error apparent on the face of the record, which warrants a review. It further held that FAO 248/06 is pending before this court. On these grounds it was dismissed. 2. I do not find any ground to interfere with the said decision. But I make it clear that the grounds, which was stated in the review application can also be taken before the High Court in FAO 248/06 by way of amendment to the cross objections filed. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE vps