CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 13783 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 13783 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: JANUARY 18, 2011 Naveen Rohilla .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate,for Mr. Jagbir Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana for the State. Mr. R.K. Malik, Senior Advocate, with Vishal Malik, Advocate, for respondent Nos.4, 6 to 10, 13 & 15. Mr. Kulwant Singh, Advocate, for respondent Nos.11 & 12. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has challenged the selection of the private respondents primarily on the ground that they do not hold the qualification prescribed for the post advertised, which is diploma in Mental Retardation (DMR) or DVTE (MR) or MBR coupled with matric with Hindi. In response to the notice, private respondents CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 13783 of 2008 -2- have filed the reply. Mr. Malik points out to the qualification possessed by the respondents to say that they are possessing higher qualification in the same line. Mr. Malik would also refer to Annexures R-4/1 and R-4/2 on the basis of which similar challenge to the same selection did not succeed before this Court in CWP No.18956 of 2008, decided on September 4, 2009 as the counsel appearing therein had withdrawn the writ petition being infructuous. In view of the above, no case for interference in the exercise of writ jurisdiction is made out. Dismissed. January 18, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE