1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.26112 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9506 OF 2009 The State ...Applicant. v. Vishram T. Patil ...Respondents. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.25912 OF 2010 State and Ors. ..Applicants. v/s. Shripati G. Gurav and Ors. ..Respondents. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.26118 OF 2010 The State and Ors. ..Applicants. v/s. Santosh D. Baddare and Ors. ..Respondents. 2 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.26100 OF 2010 The State and Ors. ...Applicants. v/s. Govind L. Powar ...Respondent. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.26121 OF 2010 The State and Ors. ..Applicants. v/s. Annappa M. Sutar and Ors. ..Respondents. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION ST. NO.26123 OF 2010 The State and Ors. ..Applicants. v/s. Dnyanu A. Patil and Ors. ..Respondents. 3 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.49 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION ST. NO.25914 OF 2010 State and Ors. ...Applicants. v/s. Govind V. Jingare Deceased Kasuai K. Jingare & Anr. ..Respondent. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.50 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.26108 OF 2010 State and Ors. ..Applicants. v/s Keshav S. Gholkar ..Respondent. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.51 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION ST.NO.26103 OF 2010 The State and Ors. ..Applicants. v/s. Nikalo M. Bardeskar ..Respondent. 4 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.52 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION ST. NO.26116 OF 2010 State and Ors. ..Applicants. v/s. Rau V. Patil and Ors. ..Respondents. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.213 OF 2010 IN REVIEW PETITION ST. NO.25910 OF 2010 State and Ors. ..Applicants. v/s. Shankar D. Patil Deceased Bhau S. Dhondi Patil and Ors. ..Respondents. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.214 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION ST. NO.26105 OF 2010 The State and Ors. ..Applicants. v/s. Ratnabai P. Patil and Ors. ..Respondents. 5 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.26111 OF 2010 IN REVIEW PETITION ST. NO.26110 OF 2010 The State and Ors. ..Applicants. v/s. Hari S. Chougale and Ors. ..Respondents. Shri Sandeep K. Shinde, Special Counsel alongwith A.I.I.Patel, AGP for the Applicant/State. Mr. G.M.Savagave, adv. For the Respondents. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA & A.M.THIPSAY, JJ. DATED : JULY 8, 2011. P.C. 1 Civil Application Stamp No.26111 of 2010 be registered waiving office objections. 2 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The state has filed civil applications for condonation of delay in filing review petitions where the State wants to point out that the respondents, who are the original petitioners in the writ petitions, had secured the orders of this Court on the basis of certain forged and fabricated documents. As the orders passed in the writ petitions pertain to the allotment of lands, it will be in the interest of justice to condone the delay in filing the review 6 petitions. 3 Therefore, all these applications are allowed and the delay in filing the review petitions is condoned. 4 Review petitions be registered and listed on 29th July, 2011 at 3.00 p.m. in the Court. The respondents shall file reply to the review petitions before that date with copy to the A.G.P. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (A.M.THIPSAY, J.)