MC 2201/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. MH Rajbarbhuiyan, learned counsel for the applicant and Dr. B Ahmed, l earned Standing Counsel, Assam Fisheries Development Corporation Limited appeari ng for all the respondents. The applicant by the present application is praying for amendment of the pleadin gs in the writ petition because of the subsequent event, namely rejection of the prayer for extension of the period for lease. Having considered the averments made in the application and the prayer for amend ment of the pleadings is not being opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, is allowed. Paragraphs Nos.2 to 7 of the present Misc. Case ar e allowed to be incorporated in the connected writ petition as paragraph Nos.12( a) to 12(f), apart from substitution of the prayer portion of the prayer as indi cated in paragraph 10 of the Misc. Case. The petitioner shall file the amended writ petition within a week with copy to t he learned Standing Counsel. Misc. Case stands disposed of.