IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36444 of 2010 1. PRAHLAD PARIT 2. Hira Devi 3. Jagan Parit Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 24.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner no.1 is husband, petitioner no.2, sister-in-law (gotni) and petitioner no.3, brother-in-law (Bhaisur). Submission is about lodging of case after 16 days of the occurrence by filing complaint petition and making vague allegations. No doubt, torture for demand of dowry within seven years of the marriage and death is there. There is no distinction in F.I.R. and complaint case on the point of statement of all allegation makers but something lacks in complaint case that is non-examination of anyone for defence or neutral or independent witness if that is taken into consideration with vague allegation against all the petitioners, liability cannot be extended to others than husband. Taking that into consideration, prayer made on behalf of the petitioner no.1 is dismissed and at the same time prayer of the petitioners no. 2 and 3 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 1229 of 2006 above named petitioners no. 2 and 3 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the 2 like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M., Ist Class, Siwan subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)