1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO., 909/ 2011 (Smt. Santosh V Bhattad VS. Union of India and others ) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : D.D.SINHA & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : 18th March, 2011. Heard Mr D V Siras, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr S.P. Deshpande for respondent No.10. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the dispute involved is between the petitioner and respondent no. 10 -Bank. The petitioner has purchased the property in question from the original borrower, namely, Shankarlal Khandelwal. Learned counsel for respective parties submitted that the dispute between them has been amicable settled and the terms of compromise are incorporated in the compromise pursis dated 15.3.2011, which is signed by the petitioner as well as Respondent No.10. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the present petition, the petitioner is not claiming any relief against the respondent nos. 1 to 9 who are the legal heirs of the original borrower i.e. Shankarlal Khandelwal. Both the counsel prayed that the present petition may be disposed 2 of in terms of the compromise pursis. On the backdrop of the above-referred facts, it appears that the dispute between the petitioner and respondent no.10-Bank has been amicably settled and the compromise pursis dated 15.3.2011 is signed by the petitioner and respondent no.10-Bank. In that view of the matter, the present Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of compromise pursis dated 15.3.2011. JUDGE JUDGE sahare