BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N.BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16744 of 2011 1. MANIVANNAN 2. SENGALVARAYAN : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.6 & 7 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, (ANTI-LAND GRABBING SPECIAL CELL), VIRUDHUNAGAR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. CRIME NO.24/2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.THIRUVADI KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr. T.MOHAN Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 465, 468 and 471 I.P.C. in Crime No.24 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been arrayed as A6 and A7 and they have been implicated for the alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 465, 468 and 471 I.P.C. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the allegation against the petitioners is to the effect that they have assisted A1, who is the main accused in this case, for fabricating the document and executing the sale deed in respect of the property belonging to the de-facto complainant. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. 3. Mr.T.Mohan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners have been implicated on the allegation that they https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ have assisted A1, who is the main accused in this case, for fabricating the document and executing the sale deed in respect of the property belonging to the de-facto complainant. It is submitted that the investigation is pending. 4. The fact remains that the main allegation of fabrication of document levelled only against A1 and as far as the petitioners are concerned, they have implicated on the allegation of assisting the main accused. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with one surety for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Judicial Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police once in a week i.e., on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of eight weeks and thereafter, they shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 21/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.2, VIRUDHUNAGAR. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, ANTI-LAND GRABBING SPECIAL CELL, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. A.THIRUVADI KUMAR Advocate SR.No.45097 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16744 of 2011 NSV/22.12.11/2P/6C Date :21/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/