1 wp2665.10.sxw ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2665 OF 2010 Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III .....Petitioner. Vs. M/s. Reena International & Anr. .....Respondents. Ms. S.I. Shah for the Petitioner. Mr. D.H. Nadkarni with Mr. Vinay Anusurkar i/by M/s. Legal Solution for Respondent No.1. CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : JUNE 27, 2011 P.C.: Rule, by consent, returnable forthwith. With the consent of the counsel and at their request, the Petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal. 2 Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and the Respondent stated before the Court that this Petition would be governed by the Judgment delivered today in Appellate Side Writ 2 wp2665.10.sxw ssm Petition No. 3956 of 2010 since the facts are similar. In terms of the Judgment delivered today in the companion Writ Petition, the present Petition is allowed by setting aside the order of the Revisional Authority dated 8 January, 2010. The Revision under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is restored to the file of the Revisional Authority for a fresh decision in accordance with law. 3 Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. There shall be no order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)