IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2011 / 2ND POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 34890 of 2011(I) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. VISHNU HARIKUMAR, 3A, STARPARK APARTMENT SUBHASH CHANDRABOSS ROAD, PONNURUNNI, VYTILA P.O., COCHIN 2. JIBIN BALACHANDRAN, VIKAS BVM ROAD, GIRINAGAR SOUTH, COCHIN. 3. ELVIN VARGHESE NADUPPARAMBIL HOUSE, A.C.M.ABOOBACKER COLONY, PLOT NO.82, CITY P.O. PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SMT.MEDONA LOPEZ RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENHGHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673635. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINTION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN - 673635. BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 34890/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE EXAMIANTION RESULT OF 1ST PETITIONER DOWN LOADED FROM THE INTERNET SITE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT P2: COPY OF THE EXAMIANTION RESULT OF 2ND PETITIONER DOWN LOADED FROM THE INTERNET SITE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT P3: COPY OF THE EXAMIANTION RESULT OF 3RD PETITIONER DOWN LOADED FROM THE INTERNET SITE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT P4: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. P5: COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF RS.265/- REMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. P6: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. P7: COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF RS.515/- REMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. P8: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER. P9: COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF RS.515/- REMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).34890/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of certain papers in the 3rd and 6th semester B.Tech Degree Examination and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs