IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20423 of 2010 CHAND MIAN @ SHAH AHMAD SON OF HASI MIAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2. 16.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 363, 364A and 347/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that initially the First Information Report was instituted for the same occurrence, but after investigation the police submitted final report in the matter and also prayed for initiation of proceeding u/ss.182 and 211 Cr.P.C. Thereafter the present complaint was filed by way of a protest petition. The submission is that from the facts of the case it does not appear to be a case u/s.364A I.P.C. In view of such, in the event of surrender of the petitioner, named above, within four weeks from today in connection with Complaint case No.297 of 2002, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shekhpura, subject to the conditions as laid down u/s.438(2) Cr.P.C. and (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the - 2 - petitioner and (ii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )