ra6.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO.6 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4009 OF 2009 Mohd. Abdul Kadar s/o Sk. Amir Kadri, R/o-Attargalli, Bhokardan, Dist-Jalna. ...APPLICANT. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, 2) The Collector, Jalna, 3) Zilla Gaurav Samiti (Feedom Fighter). ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.S.V. Jadhav Patil Advocate for Applicant. Shri.V.D. Godbharle, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri. Bhushan Kulkarni Advocate for Respondent No.3. ... ra6.10 2 CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE : 19TH JANUARY, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel Shri. Jadhav for the Review Applicant, Shri. Godbharle, learned A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Shri. Bhushan Kulkarni, learned counsel for Respondent No.3. 2. We do not find any apparent error in the order passed by us, which is under review. The grounds raised in the Review Petition do not commend to us for exercising our jurisdiction to review the order passed by us on 20th November, 2009 in Writ Petition No.4009 of 2009. The Review Petition stands rejected. 3. Shri. Jadhav, learned counsel for the Review Applicant submits that an amount of ra6.10 3 Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) which was awarded as cost under our order dated 8th December, 2010, would be deposited with the Registry of this Court within one week from today. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/JAN11/ra6.10