IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.20010 of 2010 RAMESHWAR PRASAD SINHA son of Late Balkrishna Prasad Singh, resident of Mohalla-Arya Samaj Road, Lane No.4, Bhawanipur Zirat, Motihari, P.S.-Chhatauni Dist.-East Champaran. …… …….Petitioner Versus 1.THE B.R.AMBEDHKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY through its Vice Chancellor, At. & P.O.-Muzaffarpur 2. THE Vice Chancellor, B.R.AMBEDHKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY, At. & P.O.-Muzaffarpur 3. The Registrar, B.R.AMBEDHKAR BIHAR UNIVERSITY, At. & P.O.-Muzaffarpur 4.The Principal M.S. College, Motihari At & P.O., Motihari ……. ……Respondents ----------- 2. 10.12.2010. Heard Mr.Uma Kant Shukla learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of B.R.Ambedkar Bihar University. The petitioner, who retired as University Professor, Department of Philosophy from M.S.College, Motihari with effect from 30.6.2000, has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of difference of amounts of pre and post-retirement benefits such as (i) UGC (1986 scale) salary different from 1.1.1986 to 31.12.1986, (ii) DDA from 1.4.1985 to 31.12.1985, (iii) Interim relief from 1.6.1983 to 31.12.1985, (iv) UGC (1996 scale) salary difference from 1.1.1996 to 30.6.2000 (v) Pension differential arrear from 1.7.2000 to 31.7.2005, (vi) Differential amount of revised gratuity and (vii) Differential amount of leave encashment (120 days sanctioned), the total amount of which has been specifically narrated on each account in the arrear claim dated 20.5.2010 submitted by the petitioner. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is 2 being disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before respondent no.3 i.e. the Registrar, B.R.Ambedkar Bihar University within a period of six weeks from today. In case such a representation is filed, the respondent no.3 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order for clearing the dues in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. In case of refusal, the respondent no.3 is required to pass a speaking order. With the above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)