IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD FEBRUARY 2010 / 14TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 3493 of 2010(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- C.ASHRAF, KUNNULLATHIL HOUSE, P.O.PULIYANAMBRAM, VIA PERINGATHOOR. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN SRI.P.P.RAMACHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CHOCKLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, CHOCKLI, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, CHOCKLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, CHOCKLI. 3. MONTHAL SREE NARAYANA SEVA SAMITHI, MONTHAL, P.O. OLAVILAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).3493/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT 1. The prayer sought in this writ petition is for a direction to issue occupancy certificate in respect of a building constructed by the petitioner. It is stated that Ext.P5 is the application filed by him and there is delay in considering Ext.P5. 2. The 3rd respondent had filed Ext.P2 complaint before the District Collector alleging that the building is proposed to be used as a Madrassa. Petitioner submits that thereupon an enquiry was conducted and the allegation was found to be incorrect as per Ext.P4. According to the petitioner, this was the reason for the non issuance of occupancy certificate. 3. Be that as it may, according to the petitioner, Ext.P5 application submitted him is still pending before the 2nd respondent. Therefore it is directed that the 2nd respondent shall consider the application made by the petitioner duly adverting to W.P.(C).3493/2010 2 Ext.P4 also. Orders on Ext.P5 shall be passed as expeditiously as possible at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs