IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8169 of 2011 MEENA DEVI Versus MITHILA SAHKARI GRIH NIRMAN SA ----------- 3. 09.05.2011 Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and going through the facts on record and perusal of the impugned order, I find that the petitioner who is purchaser of the land in dispute is not allowed to contest the sit it will affect his interest. Therefore, the petitioner is a necessary party. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the trial court to reconsider the application of the petitioner to be added as defendant and dispose of the same after hearing of both parties. The petition is disposed of. Ravi/- ( Prakash Chandra Verma, j.)