IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1865 of 2009 FULMATI DEVI WIFE OF CHANDRADEEP SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- GAURAKSHANI PREMCHAND PATH, SASARAM POLICE STATION SASARAM(j), DISTRICT- ROHTAS AT SASARAM. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR PRIMARY EDUCATION,NEW SECRETARIATE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT OF SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 4. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT OFFICER, ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENEAL, BIHAR BEER CHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ Manu,Adv. For the State : M/S Sunil Kumar Mandal,Adv. A.Shakoor,J.C. to S.C.15 For A.G. : Mr. Harshwandhan Pd. ----------- 3. 30.6.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State and also on behalf of the Accountant General. After some argument, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of the grievance, petitioner has already filed a representation dated 15.10.2008 to the District Superintendent of Education, Rohtas with a copy to the Accountant General. However, the representation has remained pending till date since petitioner has not heard nothing after filing of the representation. Notwithstanding - 2 - N.H./ the above for expeditious disposal of the claim, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner propose to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.3. In case, such representation is filed within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the represent order, the respondent no.3 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within three months of receipt of such representation. This writ application is disposed of with above observations and directions. ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)