vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.52 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.52 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.52 OF 2008 Pradeepkumar Dhorje ... Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharahstra & Ors. ... Respondents a/w WRIT PETITION NO.53 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.53 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.53 OF 2008 Pradeepkumar Dhorje ... Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.R.S. Deshpande i/b V.Y. Jadhav for Petitioner Mr.P.I. Khemani, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 & 3 Mr.R.G. Ketkar for Respondent No.2 CORAM: J.N. PATEL & J.N. PATEL & J.N. PATEL & SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. MHATRE, JJ. MHATRE, JJ. DATED: JANUARY 30, 2008 JANUARY 30, 2008 JANUARY 30, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The learned Counsel for the Petitioner in both the Petitions submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file a fresh petition, if so required. The learned Counsel for the local Planning Authority pointed out from the two petitions that it appears that the properties which the petitioners own, do not fall under the acquisition proceedings. 2. In the facts and circumstances, we permit the : 2 : petitioner to withdraw the two petitions with liberty to file a fresh petition, if so required. 3. Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. (J.N. PATEL, J.) (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.)