ILE UB ^ , S 'too/ (2) IN THE HON'BLE HSGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.(S)No.T?>(:)V /2006 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS : ^ 1 KAMTA PRASAD BAGHEL Aged about 59 years, Assistant Teacher, S/o Shri Chunni Lal Baghel, Govt. Primary School, Tumdileva, Block- Chhuriya, Distt.- Rajanandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS STATE GOVT. OF CHHATTISGARH Through : Secretary, School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) DIRECTOR, Lok Shikshan, Raipur (C.G.) DY. DIRECTOR, Lok Shikshan, Durg Division, Durg (C.G.) DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) JEEVAN LAL KASHYAP Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Saloni Distt.- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETIT!ON UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE ^^'^-^ ^sy^-^- ^^t^Sv^^ .sST?''"" .,.V'1/ ^. .^•^4. CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HI6H CWKT OF CHH4THS6ARH AT BIUtSPUR P. fs) No. 7361 of 2006 Kamta Prosod Boghel 23 Petitioner Versus Re^ondents : State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh and others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Xgnfhotri, J A^r. Ajay Shrivastnva, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sushil Dubey, fiovemment Advocute for •the re^iondents No, 1 to 4/S-tate. OR&ER 0>asse<l on 4th doy of Jonuary, 2007) The following order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ^ 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as welt as leamed Sovemment Advocate o^pearing for the respondents/State jointly aibmit that the facts of the present case are similar to that of in W. P. (s) 6676 of 2006 (Ramchhabite Yactav Vs. State of Chhatt-isgarh & others), which wo« disposed of vide order dated 6 Oecember, 2006. They further submit that the question of law involved is also thesame. 2. In view of the above stated submissions made by tearned counsel for the parties, this petition is diqiosed of in terms of the order dated 6th Oecember, 2006 passed by this Court- in W. P. (s) 6676 of 2006. No order as to costs. Babfu Sd/- Satish KAgnihotti Judge