IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17833 of 2011 Bijendra Yadav @ Harkhu Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02 27.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 353/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the Electricity Act. The accusation is of running 7.5 H.P. Motor for running holler machine by committing theft of electricity. The loss has been calculated to the tune of Rs. 2,00,000/-. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is a bonafide consumer having consumer I.D. no. MD. 2951 and has consumed the electricity and has paid the bill up to June 2011, and the electricity has not been disconnected and he has no holler machine. It appears that under certain misconception the F.I.R. has been lodged without disclosing the fact that the petitioner is a bonafide consumer. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, in the 2 event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Rani Talab P.S. Case No. 20 of 2011, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)