1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMM.FOR JUDGMENT NO. 257 OF 2004 IN SUMM. SUIT NO.459 OF SUMM. SUIT NO.459 OF SUMM. SUIT NO.459 OF 2004 2004 2004 Mr.Akbarali Hamid & ors .. Plaintiffs versus Lok Holdings & Cons. Ltd & ors .. Defendants ... Ms.Neena Kapadia i.b Pandya & Ghandy & Co for Plffs Mr.N.G.Raut for Defendants. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 6th April 2005. DATED : 6th April 2005. DATED : 6th April 2005. P.C:- P.C:- P.C:- 1. Learned counsel for the plaintiff does not press the suit against the defendant no. 3. Suit is dismissed against the defendant no. 3 for non prosecution. 2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant nos. 1 and 2 hand in the consent terms. 2 Consent terms are signed by the respective advocates. Consent terms are taken on record and marked X for identification. 3. Consent terms are signed by Mr. Moiz Halela as Constituted Attorney for the plaintiff. The original power of attorney is handed in which be returned on production of true xerox copy thereof. Consent terms are also signed by Mrs.Mina Merchant for defendant nos. 1 and 2 as director of both the companies. Both the signatories are present and are identified by their respective counsel. 4. Consent terms are also signed by the respective advocates. 5. There shall be order in terms of consent terms. D.G.KARNIK, J