IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.10157 of 2008. Decided on: 17.12.2010. Surinder Kumar. ……….Petitioner. Versus H.P.Krishi Vishav Vidayalya,Palampur. ……….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : None For the respondent. : Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The representation made by the petitioner dated 27th December, 2002 has been rejected by the respondent-University without passing a speaking order. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-University to decide the representation by passing a speaking order within a period of two months after the production of a certified copy of judgment by the petitioner. Since the petitioner is neither present in person nor represented by the counsel, the respondent- University is directed to inform the petitioner of today’s judgment. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 17, 2010. (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.