IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 20020 of 2008 Between: 1 Professional Academy of Educational Research, Represented by its Secretary T.V. Narayana S/o.China Subba Rao 31-21-14, Near Yadavas Temple, Innespet, Rajahmundry - 533 101, East Godavari District. 2 Vikas Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Represented by its Principal - S.C. Marihal S/o.Chinna Basappa Nidigatla Village, Korukonda Mandal, Rajahmundry - 533 103, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Higher and Technical Education Department, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 AP State Council for Higher Education, represented by its Secretary, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 3 Commissioner & Directorate of Technical Education, BRKR Buildings, Hyderabad. 4 Convener - EAMCET -2008 (Admissions) JNTU, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 5 Andhra University, rep. by its Registrar, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, or order or direction declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not recognizing the approval granted by AICTE in F.No. AP-002/NDEGP/2008-09 dt. 2.9.2008 to the 2nd petitioner institution and in not including the 2nd petitioner institution in the list of approved institutions for the academic year 2008-09 and not allotting the students to the 2nd petitioner's institution under the Convener quota as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and further consequently direct the respondents to recognize the approval of AICTE granted in favour of the 2nd petitioner and order for include the 2nd petitioner institution in the list of approved institutions by allotting students under the Convener quota by granting permission and pass such further or other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.CHANDRA SEKHAR ILAPAKURTI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission as sought for is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. __________ 14-10-2008 rkk