IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1467 of 2007 DR.HARINDRA PRASAD SINGH @ HARINDRA PD.SINGH ….Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. VINAY KUMAR ….Opposite parties ----------- 2. 7.11.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order. It appears that the court below has properly considered the evidences and circumstances and has rightly dismissed the complaint petition. I see no reason to interfere in the impugned order. The reason for false implication of opposite party no. 2 has also been mentioned in the impugned order. Accordingly, this Cr. Revision is dismissed at the admission stage itself. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)