1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8093 OF 2010 Surrya Begum w/o Mir Razzak Ali & anr. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS Mir Jabbar Ali s/o Ahmed Ali & ors. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri Shaikh Ashpak Taher Patel, Advocate for the petitioners Mrs. A.N. Ansari, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 2 ..... CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 4th October, 2010 PER COURT : 1. A request made by the petitioners (original defendant Nos.1 to 3) for postponing the matter with a view to facilitate them to produce the witnesses for purpose of examination before the Court has been turned down by the trial Court in view of order passed on 17.8.2010 and the said interlocutory order passed below Exh.310 is subjected to challenge in this writ petition. It is contended by the petitioners (original defendant Nos.1 and 3) that they need to examine three witnesses. A purshis is presented to the Court giving the details in respect of the witnesses sought to be examined by the concerned defendants. The ends of justice would be met if defendant Nos.1 and 3 are directed to place on record of the trial 2 Court the affidavits in the form of examination-in-chief of all the three witnesses on the next date prescribed in the matter i.e. on 14.10.2010. The petitioners/original defendant Nos.1 and 3 shall ensure presence of all the three witnesses before the Court on 21.10.2010. On 21.10.2010, the plaintiffs/ respondents be extended an opportunity to cross-examine all the witnesses. In the event of failure of the petitioners to abide by the programme noted above, the permission accorded to the petitioners to examine the witnesses, noted in purshis, shall be deemed to have been withdrawn. With the observations recorded above, writ petition stands disposed of. R.M. BORDE JUDGE fmp/wp8093.10