RSA No.3239 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. RSA No.3239 of 2008 Date of Decision: 14.07.2009 Mukhtiar Singh ...Appellant V E R S U S Karam Singh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for the appellant. AJAY TEWARI J. (ORAL) This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below whereby the suit of the appellant regarding permanent injunction has been partly decreed. The appellant is in appeal only qua Khasra Nos.537 and 538 with regard to which his suit had been rejected. Learned counsel has proposed the following questions of law:- i) “Whether the courts below have misread the entries in the revenue record? ii)Whether the courts below have failed to understand the point of law raised by the plaintiff in the suit? iii)Whether the courts below have failed to decide the suit in accordance with Section 45 of the Land Revenue Act as well as the provisions of law providing for the change of entries in revenue record?” RSA No.3239 of 2008 -2- As a matter of fact both the Courts below have found that no evidence was led by the appellant in respect of Khasra Nos.537 and 538. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to persuade me that either this finding is based on no evidence or is based on such misreading of evidence so as to render it perverse. Once it is held that the appellant was not proved to be in possession of Khasra Nos.537 and 538, the questions proposed do not arise. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed. No costs. As the main case has been disposed of therefore all the pending civil miscellaneous applications in the case also stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) July 14, 2009 JUDGE ashish