Crl.M.C.No.2103/2008 Page 1 of 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.M.C.No.2103/2008 % Date of decision : 23.07.2008 Mohd. Alamgir & Others ….… Petitioners Through: Mr.Keshav Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner no.3. Versus The State (NCT of Delhi) & Another ......... Respondents Through : Mr. R.N. Vats, APP for the State. IO/SI Anil Kumar, EOW, Crime Branch. CORAM :- * HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may YES be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported NO in the Digest? ANIL KUMAR, J. * Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that all the petitioners are present. Respondent no.2 is also present who is identified by IO/SI Anil Kumar, EOW, Crime Branch. Respondent no.2 who appears in person contends that no useful purpose shall be served in continuing the proceeding in FIR No. 6/2007 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC registered at P.S. New Friends colony, Delhi. Crl.M.C.No.2103/2008 Page 2 of 2 The matter has been settled between the parties. The statement of Respondent No.2 has been recorded who has deposed that he has settled his disputes without any coercion, pressure or undue influence on him and on his own free will and it is further contended that no useful purpose shall be served if the proceedings in FIR No. 6/2007 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC registered at P.S. New Friends colony continue, rather it will be in the interest of justice if the said proceedings are quashed. Consequently, the FIR No. 6/2007 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC registered with P.S. New Friends Colony and all the proceedings emanating there from are quashed. The petition is disposed of. Dasti. July 23, 2008 ANIL KUMAR, J. ‘j’