IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.56154 of 2007 PARIKHA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 2.5.2008 Surendra/ Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the prayer of the petitioner was earlier rejected but at that time it could not be placed specifically that the injury no.2 in the postmortem report is the exit wound caused at the back of the deceased. Injury No.1 caused by a co- accused and though it is alleged that the petitioner has shot at the chest of the deceased but the injury found on the deceased is not a separate wound, rather it is connecting to injury no.1. In this situation, the petitioner deserves to be released on bail. He referred to the copy of the postmortem report wherein it has been clearly mentioned that injury no.1 is entry wound and injury no.2 is exit wound. Considering the above, the petitioner, Parikha Singh, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of F.T.C.III. Gaya in S.Tr.No. 13/2007 arising out of Alipur (Tekari) P.S.Case No. 20/2006 (G.R.No. 997/2006). ( Rekha Kumari,J.)