1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3597 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – IV, Pune ..Appellant. Versus Western maharashtra Development Corpn. Limited, Pune ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant. None for the respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3602 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 6, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Dresser Rand India Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan i/by Suresh Kumar for the appellant. None for the respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3604 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 7, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Procter & Gamble Distribution Co. Limited ..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan i/by Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant. Mr.Sanjiv M. Shah for the respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3606 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.N.R. Jet Enterprises Limited, Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr.P.S. sahadevan i/by Suresh Kumar for the appellant. Mr.S.S. Shetty for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 8TH JULY, 2009 P.C. : Appellant is directed to remove office objections, if any, and serve unserved respondent within eight weeks from today. Hamdust allowed. In addition to hamdast service, private service by R.P.A.D. / Speed post is permitted. Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections and / or to serve unserved respondent, appeal shall stand dismissed without any reference to the Court. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)