vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.266 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.266 OF 2003 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.266 OF 2003 The State of Maharashtra ... Appellant V/s. Kirit Jethalal Shah & Anr. ... Respondents Mrs.V.R. Bhosale, APP, for Appellant Ms.G.Manohara with Ms.M.A. Ingale for Respondent No.1 CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATED: NOVEMBER 6, 2006 NOVEMBER 6, 2006 NOVEMBER 6, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . By this application, the State seeks permission to file an appeal against the order dated 2.8.2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay acquitting the accused persons of various charges under the Indian Penal Code and the MPID Act. The learned trial Judge has given cogent reasons for recording an order of acquittal. Paragraphs 20 and 21 of the judgment elaborate the reasoning. In our opinion, no legal error is committed by the learned Judge in coming to the conclusion thatno criminality was involved in the liability incurred by the accused persons. The order of acquittal in such circumstances does not need any interference. Application is rejected.