upa 1 wp7232-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7232 OF 2010 Smt.Sulochana Rajaram Shirke ).. Petitioner Versus Slum Rehabilitation Authority and others ).. Respondents Mr. S.A. Sawant i/b Mr.J.S. Chandnani for the Petitioner. Mr. J.G. Reddy for Respondent Nos.1 and 4. Mr. Tamhane i/b M/s.Tamhane & Co. for Respondent No.2. Mr. A.H. Palekar, “A” Panel Counsel, for Respondent No.5 State. CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. AND DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. TUESDAY, OCTOBER 19, 2010 P. C. : The grievance in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not considering the petitioner’s Appeal No.24 of 2010 for hearing by the High Power Committee in respect of Letter of Intent dated 5 May 2010 in favour of respondent no.2. 2. The learned counsel for respondent no.4 states that the High Power Committee will hear and decide the appeal of the petitioner within eight weeks from today. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays for interim stay during the pendency of the appeal. upa 2 wp7232-10 4. Since the appeal itself is pending before the High Powered Committee, we do not propose to entertain such a request. It is for the High Power Committee to decide the appeal on merits and also to consider any application for interim relief, if any. 5. Since the Letter of Intent is in favour of respondent nos.2 and 3, the petitioner shall also serve a copy of the appeal filed before the High Power Committee to respondent nos.2 and 3. 6. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for respondent no.4, nothing survives in the present petition and the same is disposed of accordingly. 7. It is clarified that we have not gone into the controversy between the parties. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.