IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 2008 ANANT YASHWANT VOLVOIKAR ... Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH POLICE INSPECTOR CALANGUTE POLICE STATION AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. P. Lotlikar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Winnie Coutinho, Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.1. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 7th July, 2008 P.C.:- Heard Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of the Petitioner who is an accused in Sessions Case No.25/2006. By Order dated 13-3-2008, this Court had remanded the case to be heard again before framing of charge against the accused. The main contention of the learned Senior Counsel is that after remand, the accused were not at all heard. Learned Senior Counsel submits that, that is a ground taken by revision Petitioner in the Revision Application and that is also reflected in the impugned Order. It was certainly expected of the learned trial Court to have heard the accused after the remand order. In view of the above, the Revision succeeds. The impugned Order is hereby set aside and the learned trial Court is hereby directed to hear the parties and pass appropriate orders at the stage of framing of charge against the accused. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.