$§ng§§y gmch IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 1C G 1 PETITIONER : VIJAY /’ SINGH S/o. Satya , Nérayan Singh ; Aged about — 55 Year, R/o. Village — RESPONDENDS: L/ State of Chhattisgarh Through? Collector Bilaspur (C.G.) The Tahsildar Bilaspur Tahsil Office Bilaspur (C.G.) 3?, The Revenue Inspector, Tahsil — Bilaspur, Tahsil ‘Offlce Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner named above most respectfully begs to submit as under :— Wa g E “ q/v\\)\\é Q‘y"‘Wmx Torva,; Tahsil ~Bi1aspur/ aw 1m (M .A ?‘Bs “K” ")g éaxaQ ........ VERSUS SB : Hon’bie Shri Manmdra iv‘lohan E hrivastava. J. 2L94=2911 $hri Vineet Kumar Pandey, cou wsei for the peiitioner. Shri Ajay DWivedi, Deputy Government Advocate for the resbondents on advance copy. Through this petition, the petitioner has sought to ventiiate grievance arising on accouni of inaction on the part of respondent No.2 in not making demarcation on an appiicationmaoie *or the purposes, by the petitioner Vide Annexure P/i dated ave/06. Learned counsei for the petitio appiication for demarcation has been was purchased by the petitioner. He fL rt‘ner submits that responcient No.2 had noted and endorsed vide his memo dated 6/1 11'06 (Annexure Fifi) to conduct demarcation and submit report but inspite of that the respondent No.3 has not demarcated. He submits that the! 1er submits that the iand for which the made, beiongs to the petitioner, which eafter,though certain proceedings have been drawn)but tiii date demarcation has not taken piace. Learned counsei for the petitioner submits that the oni reiief sought in the petition is that the authorities may be directed to conci de demarcation proceedings, which is pending since 2036. The prayer appears to be re sonabie. Therefore, interest of justice woutd be served if a direction is iss ed to respondent No.2 to conciude the demarcation proceedings on petitio er‘s apptication and dispose off his appiication expeditiousiy in accordan e with taw. Respondent No.3 shaii aiso take necessary steps as directed by respondent No.2, as the appiication of the petitioner remained pending sinc 2006, . .. %*F. 6w ga? M raw m m $§fg . mgmmtw WWm fa? WK - % 3Wm ”F XLHC-22 w 3a W. mm.W am mmwéw 1%Q§J§WI Fc m mmW — . g2 -— WWW a? ma? Wm feuérW Let necessary demarcation proceedings be conciuded and petitioner‘s off .isiy as possibie, in any case, not Eater appiica‘tion be disposed as expeditio ihan three monthe, from the date of receipt of copy of this order. oft. With the aforesaid observationsx the petition is t‘rnaiiy disposed -k , Sd/— Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Deepti Judge