IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 9397 of 2008. Decided on : 31st March, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Chattar Singh Thakur and Others. …Petitioners. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioners. : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 3. : Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner No. 2, Shri Swaroop Lal Dhiman has already made a representation for the redressal of his grievance to the competent authority on 07.02.2002. However, the same has been rejected on 8th October 2002 (Annexure A-9), without a speaking/detailed order. 2. Consequently, the petition is allowed. Annexure A-9, dated 8th October, 2002 is quashed and set aside. The representation dated 07.02.2002 now shall be decided afresh by the Director General of Police and Commandant General, Home Guards, Civil Defence and Fire Services, H.P., Shimla by passing a speaking/detailed order, within a period of two months from 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioners. Petitioners shall be heard in person and for that purpose, they shall be notified the date separately. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge March 31, 2011. (bhupender) - 3 - `