THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No. 1485 of 2010 ORAL ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the orders of the learned III Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in I.A.No. 901 of 2009 in O.S.No. 570 of 2009, dated 3.8.2009 seeking direction to the respondents to restore the supply of electricity to the suit schedule property immediately. Brief facts of the revision are that: Respondent herein is the plaintiff, who filed O.S.No. 570 of 2009 against the petitioners herein, who are the defendants for perpetual injunction. For the purpose of convenience, the parties as arrayed before the lower Court are referred to hereinafter in this order. In the said suit, petitioner-plaintiff filed I.A.No. 901 of 2009 against the respondents-defendants seeking a direction against the respondents-defendants for restoration of supply of electricity to the suit schedule property immediately. After hearing both sides, the learned trial Court has allowed the said petition with costs. Aggrieved by the said order, the defeated respondents-defendants have preferred the present Civil Revision Petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the order under revision. As can be seen from the order under revision that the learned trial Court has granted restoration of electricity supply after following the Judgment of our High Court in CHENI CHENCHAIAH Vs. SHAIK ALI SAHEB(1993(2) A.L.T. 517 (AP). In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and also in view of the order passed by the trial Court directing the respondents to restore electricity supply to the suit schedule property through the officials concerned, immediately, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the order of the learned trial Court and the order of the learned trial Court is legal and valid and the same cannot be interfered with. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. _______________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J 8.4.2010 CHV