THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Writ Petition No. 1999 of 2007 Dated: 07.09.2010 Between: Dosapati Danaiah and 5 others. … Petitioner And The Mandal Revenue Officer, Krishna District and 2 others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No. 1999 of 2007 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents in seeking to grant house site pattas in the land situated in Sy.No.343/6 and 355/14 B of Anigandlapadu village, Penuganchiprolu Mandal, Krishna District to ineligible persons ignoring the genuine beneficiaries including the petitioners is arbitrary and illegal. It is pleaded in the writ petition that though the petitioners are entitled for grant of house site pattas and their names were initially included in the list of beneficiaries, the same were subsequently deleted and names of some ineligible persons were included. In the counter affidavit filed by the Tahsildar, Penuganchiprolu on behalf of the respondents, the allegations have been denied and it is explained as under: “ In reply to para 3 of the petitioners’ affidavit, I submit that as per the Policy of the government for allotment of house site, Annual Income should not exceed Rs.18,000/- as such the above petitioner No.1 who is drawing Rs.24,000/- per annum is not entitled for the allotment of house sites. The Door No. of Sri D.Dosapati Danaiah is 8-79. Petitioner No.2 N.Krishna Government issued house site patta to his father’s name previously and his case will be considered in future. Petitioner No.3 K.Ravi Government issued house site patta to his father’s name previously and his case will be considered in future. Petitioner No.4 Kota Swamy, Government issued house site in his father’s name. Subsequently his father died. Kota Swamy is the only son and he inherited the house site and dwelling in the same house vide D.No.9-92. Petitioner No.5 T.Bhupesh, his father got own house vide D.No.8-98/1. The father of the petitioner was assigned an extent of land Ac.1.00 and he raised Mango garden. So he got benefited through the Government and also having Ac.0.76 cents wet land. Petitioner No.6 Dasari Swamy, Government issued house site to his father Gopaiah, later he died. Dasari Swamy inherited the house site and dwelling in the same house vide D.No.1-106.” It is also stated that the petitioners names were not recommended by the Gramasabha and their names were never included in the list of beneficiaries and therefore, the question of deletion of their names does not arise. No reply affidavit is filed nor any other material could be placed before this Court by the petitioners contradicting the stand taken in the counter affidavit. In the circumstances, no further enquiry is necessary and accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take necessary action in accordance with law so far as the petitioners 2,3 and 4 are concerned. No costs. ​ ______________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 07.09.2010 KLP