IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.69 of 2009 Smt. Shanti Devi & Anr Versus Sadhu Pandit & Anr ---------------------------------- 4 14-9-2011 Mr. Shailendra Kr. Dwivedi, advocate, appearing on the instruction of Mr.Ranjan Kumar Dubey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, submits that the impugned order is interlocutory in nature and as such the revision application is not maintainable. He makes a prayer to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in view of the decision in Durga Devi Vs.Vijay Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010(2)PLJR 954. Mr. Chandrakant, advocate, appearing on behalf of the opposite parties, who has raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the revision application on the same line, has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel. The prayer is allowed. Four weeks’ time is granted to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. roy ( V. Nath, J.) 2