HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.29416 of 2010 Date: 05-11-2011 Between Pothanaboina Saida … Petitioner and District Collector, Khammam district and 5 others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.29416 of 2010 Order: Heard Smt. K.Radhika, learned counsel, representing Sri V.Raghu, learned counsel for the petitioner; the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents 1 to 3; and the learned Government Pleader for Education appearing for the respondents 4 and 5. 2. The case of the petitioner is that she was appointed as mid- day meal agency and has been working since 2003. Even though the District Educational Officer, Khammam, the 5th respondent herein, issued proceedings on 08-01-2010 not to change the existing implementing agencies, the 4th respondent- Mandal Educational Officer, Konijerla Mandal, is taking steps to replace the petitioner. 3. This writ petition has been filed without there being any cause of action. Admittedly, the petitioner has approached this Court without any order passed removing or replacing her. The writ petition has been filed on mere apprehension. Therefore, I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition. 4. At the hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the 4th respondent has replaced the petitioner by passing an order. If that be so, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same. The learned counsel further submits that a copy of the said order has not been furnished. In view of the said submission, the 4th respondent is directed to furnish a copy of the order to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, so as to enable the petitioner to work out her remedies in accordance with law. 5. Subject to the above, the writ petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. No costs. ___________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. 05th November, 2011. Ak HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.29416 of 2010 05th November, 2011. (Ak)