3.3 t PETITIONER : Leel aga Divi Sec Versus ’ RESFONDENTS 1. Stat Sec Bha 2 The , Dep 3. Dis Dur 4 The 6 B 5 The Min Writ Petition under Artie! 8.3 Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra 08.12.2008 Mr. Vipin Tiwari, counsel Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel La Heard. Glievance of the petitioner Teacher and posted at Govt. of Madhya Pradesh, vide Circular 1987 directed the Commissioner, Upper Division Teachers from graduates in science by promon'on. promotion on the basis of above petitioner’s case was not Singh Verma, 'S/o Shri R.L. Velma, about 45 years, occupation —Upper ion Teachcr, Govt. Middle School r—6 Bhilai, Distt. Durg (CG) of Chhattisgarh, through — the taty, Educau'on Department, D.K.S. an, Raipur (CG) Dircctor, Public Instruction cnt, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur ‘ct Education Omcer Durg, Distt. — (CG) Principal, Govt. Middle School, Sector- ' 'Durg (CG) 7 « > Upper Director, ST., SC” OBC. and rs Kalyan Department, Raipur (CG) 226 of the Constitution of India or the petitioner. I is that he is working as Assistant Middle School, Bhilai. The erstwhile State of Annexure P—l dated 20th January Public Education to ml up the post of the Assistant Teachers, who are Number of teachers were given Circular of Annexure Pal, however, the considered. Thereafter, the petitioner hled mmmm mwifwm §NTWW ~?r__ Writ Petition (S) No.710/05 for I edress‘al of his abcvs gn'evances and in pursuancs of the order dated 8‘11 Januaxy 2007 passed in the above writ petition, the petitioner was granted promotion on the post of Upper Division Teacher vide order dated 18.8.2008 of Annexare P-6. Grievance of the petitioner in petitioner has been given prom seniority nom the date when he Learned counsel for the S hles flesh representation for nt No.3 within seven days from tc same shall be considered and d further period 8 weeks from the In View of the above subn the instant petition is disposed fresh representah'on for notione within a period of seven days order. On such representation decide the same Within a furth er period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. the present case is that though the Dtion, however, he has not been given was entitled to get such promotion. tate submits that in case the petitioner )tional seniority before the respondent day along with copy of this order, the ecided by the respondent No.3 within a date of receipt of representation. Lission of learned counsel for the State, of with liberty to the petitioner to me a 11 seniority before the respondent No.8 h‘om today along with a copy of this being made, the respondent No.3 shall Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge \ \s‘ \ [tiia W