IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6377 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.6377 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.6377 OF 2005 Avinath Tukaram Sanas. ... Applicant. Versus. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondents. Shri Naveen Chomal for the Applicant. Shri A.S.Gadkari, A.P.P.for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. : ABHAY S. OKA, J. : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 3rd October, 2005. : 3rd October, 2005. : 3rd October, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. After having heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties, I find that there is no change in circumstances. The earlier applications for bail made by the Applicant to this Court have been rejected by this Court by orders dated 30th June 2005 and 22nd August 2005. If there is no change in circumstances, this third application cannot be entertained. 3. The learned Advocate for the Applicant submitted that the Applicant has subsequently shown repentance and he may be permitted to file a fresh application before the learned Special Judge and the learned Special Judge may be directed to hear the application afresh. : 2 : 2 : 2 : 4. If no case is made out for the change of circumstance as today, such request cannot be acceded to. There is no merit in the application and the same is rejected. Judge. Judge. Judge.