IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18054 of 2009 1. KUMARI SIMI D/O ANIL KUMAR SINHA R/O NEW RAILWAY COLONY, QUARTER NO. 198, KHAGAUL, DISTT. PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT BUILDING, PATNA 2. THE CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIVERSITIES, BIHAR-CUM-HIS EXCELLENCIES THE GOVERNOR OF BIHAR RAJ BHAWAN, PATNA 3. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA, DISTT. GAYA, BIHAR 4. THE REGISTRAR null MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA, DISTT. GAYA 5. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION MAGADH UNIVERSITY, BODH GAYA, DISTT. GAYA 6. THE PRINCIPAL MAHILA COLLEGE, KHAGAUL, DANAPUR, PATNA ----------- 2. 15.03.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the Counsel for the University as also the State. If the petitioner has represented in context of her marks for B.A. English (Honours) Course and has applied for re- totaling, as alleged, naturally the University is required to publish her results in accordance with law to save the educational career and prospects of the student. In this regard the University is naturally expected to make all necessary endeavours to fulfill its own obligations quite distinct from the legal eligibility that may apply to the petitioner. The two are distinct issues and the University has to perform its duty for publication of result in accordance with law if it has permitted the student to appear in the examination. It is expected that the University shall act promptly upon presentation of this order such representation within a period of two months thereof. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)