IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.397 OF 2011 Between : T.Ramesh Reddy .... PETITIONER A N D P.Nagabhushan Reddy and others. …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.397 OF 2011 O R D E R: This Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the docket order, dated 31.12.2010, in I.A.No.189 of 2010 in O.S.No.361 of 2005 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Hindupur, Anantapur District, whereunder and whereby, the application filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’) to club O.S.No.361 of 2005 along with O.S.No.107 of 2006 in order to avoid conflict of decisions, was dismissed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. O.S.No.107 of 2006 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Hindupur, was filed by the petitioner herein seeking a direction to the respondents herein /defendants to execute a registered sale deed in pursuance of an agreement of sale, dated 11.07.2000 in respect of plaint schedule property after receiving the balance sale consideration within the time fixed by the Court. O.S.No.361 of 2005 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Hindupur, was filed by the first respondent herein for permanent injunction restraining the petitioner herein from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the self same property. 4. As seen from the record, the issues involved in the two suits are separate and distinct. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the parties are same and the property involved is the same. There are no common questions, fact or law arise between the parties in the two suits. The evidence to be adduced in both the suits is not one and same. So, the conflict of decisions may not arise. Considering the fact that the issues to be resolved or adjudicated are different, it is not desirable to club both the suits. Hence, they can be disposed of simultaneously. Hence, there are no grounds to interfere with the impugned order. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of directing the trial court to dispose of both the suits simultaneously as expeditiously as possible. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C.BHANU, J FEBRUARY 14, 2011. YVL