IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21076 of 2011 Surendra Prasad & Anr Versus Bachcha Tiwari & Ors ---------------------------------- 03. 09.12.2011. The only grievance of the petitioner is that while allowing amendment application, the learned Court below did not grant the petitioner liberty to file additional written statement with respect to the amended portion of the plaint. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the plaint itself is liable to be rejected on the ground of limitation. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below has not refused the petitioner to file additional written statement. In such circumstances, the petitioner may file the additional written statement with respect to the amended portion only. So far limitation matter is concerned, the same cannot be decided in supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner may approach the Court below by filing the application raising this question. With this observation, this writ application is disposed of. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)