IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10043 of 2008 SANJIT PASWAN @ AMRENDRA JI @ PREMI JI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 7.7.2008 Heard. Petitioner is named in the F.I.R. As per the recital he is alleged to have fired at the deceased Ashok Sharma along with Rajendra Kahar and Ram Siya Kahar. It is not denied that there were four injuries caused by fire arm and death was on account of fire arm injuries. The contention is that there were some entry in the general diary and that does not have any name of any person. The second contention was that quite a good number of persons, who were examined in so many paragraphs of the case diary, have stated that it was the extremists who had killed the deceased Ashok Sharma, son of the informant. The third contention was that even the statements of witnesses in the case diary do not specify the allegation as to which part of the body was hit by which of the assailant. The last contention was that petitioner is in custody since 23.6.2007. The case is under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, petitioner is alleged to be the assailant of the deceased and injuries were found there, considering which the prayer is dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha, J )