1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.706 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.845 OF 2009 M/s.Rohanraj Enterprises .. Applicant. Vs. Dr.Abhay Gangadhar Paghdre and Others .. Respondents. Mr.F.Devitre, senior counsel, Mr.Simil Purohit, Mr.Rajeev Bhatia, Mr.Shreyas Mehta, Mr.Abhishek Sawant i/b M/s.Apex Consillis for the applicant. Mr.Pooneet Chaturvedi i/b Mr.Sanjay Gawde for respondent no.1 CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & R.Y.GANOO,JJ. DATED : 12/03/2010. PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Counsel for the parties without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties placed on record 100 photographs duly signed by their advocates on record. The photographs are taken on record. There is no dispute that these photographs were taken on 25.2.2010, in order to show the status of the property and structures standing thereon on this date. Respondent No.1 is present in the court. He states that the status quo order passed by this court on 18.9.2009 shall be complied with and the suit structure will not be changed in any S 2 manner. He further undertakes that he will maintain status quo on the site and no construction will be done by him or any person claiming through him and/or shall not engage in any activity either by himself or through his agents or servants in any manner so as to change the suit property in any way. His undertaking is accepted. 3. Learned counsel for the parties have also agreed that two representatives of the appellant shall be allowed to enter the property and inspect the same on every second and fourth Saturday between 10 am and 12 noon. They are also allowed to take photographs, if they so desire. It is needless to state that respondent no.1 shall allow the representatives of the applicant to enter the property and take photographs. If the representatives of the applicant take any photographs they shall also supply copies thereof to respondent no.1. It is open to respondent no.1 to depute his representative/s, if he so desires, to accompany the representatives of the applicant. 4. At this stage learned counsel for respondent no.1 insisted that we should record in the order that representatives of the appellant shall enter the property only with camera. We are not making such observation. Civil application is disposed of. (R.Y.Ganoo,J.) (D.B.Bhosale,J.)