IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 2ND AUGUST 2010 / 11TH SRAVANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 4512 of 2010() ---------------------------------------- SC.193/2009 of II ADDL. SESSIONS COURT,ERNAKULAM. CRIME NO.330/2009 OF HILL PALACE POLICE STATION. .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 (ORIGINAL ACCUSED NO.13) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NAZEER, AGED 37, S/O.SHAMSUDDIN, THATTAKKATTU VEEDU, THAIKAVU, NETTOOR DESOM, MARADU VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.RAMAN PILLAI, SRI.R.ANIL, SRI.ANIL K.MOHAMMED, SRI.SUJESH MENON V.B., SRI.JOSEPH P.ALEX, SRI.SHYAM ARAVIND, SRI.T.ANIL KUMAR. RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT -------------------------------------------- STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.K.S. SIVAKUMAR. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/08/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs. V. RAMKUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = B.A.No.4512 of 2010 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated, this the 2nd day of August, 2010 ORDER Petitioner who is the 13th accused in S.C.No.474/2006 on the file of the Sessions Court, Ernakulam for an offence punishable under Section 365 read with 34 IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 13.9.2003. The petitioner was arrested on 30.3.2009. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application inter alia submitting that the petitioner who was arrested on 11.10.2003 and who was granted bail by this Court jumped bail and ever since he has been fleeing from justice. He is the persons who supplied swords and other deadly weapons to the other accused persons and that he is involved in 22 cases. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the legal injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) dmb