IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17742 of 2010 RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH, s/o Sri Yogi Singh, R/0 village- Laxmipur, P.O. Sinha Ghat, P.S. Krishnagarh, District- Bhojpur at present Mohalla- Mahavir tola (Sahid Bhawan), District- Bhojpur,Ara…… Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Patna, Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Patna, Bihar. 3. The State Drugs Controller, Patna, Bihar. 4. The Licensing Authority ( Drugs Control Administration) Bhjpur, Ara. 5. The Inspector of Drugs, Bhojpur, Ara. 6. The Civil Surgon, Bhojpur, Ara. 7. Rana Pratap Singh, son of late Manlal Singh, resident of village- Mansa Pandey bag, Ara, P.O.Ara Town, District- Bhojpur,Ara…. Respondents ----------- 2. 28.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks a direction upon the respondent authorities to cancel the Drug licence of private respondent No.7. From the statements made in the writ petition it appears that respondent No.7 is a tenant of the petitioner. The petitioner had made certain complaints before the respondent authorities under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and pursuant to the same the respondent authorities had, after making appropriate enquiry issued a warning to respondent No.7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that merely issuance of warning is not sufficient and accordingly, he has approached this Court. - 2 - On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not find it a fit case for interference in the writ jurisdiction, as apparently the action of the petitioner appears to be motivated by the landlord-tenant relationship and it is not the case of the petitioner that no action has been taken by the respondent authorities pursuant to the complaint made by the petitioner. In the above circumstances, there is no merit in the writ petition and it is, accordingly, dismissed. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )