IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA MONDAY, THE 21ST JUNE 2010 / 31ST JYAISTHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 3722 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ CRIME NO.410/09 OF NADAPURAM POLICE STATION (S): PETITIONER/IST ACCUSED ------------------------------------------ SHEBEER, S/O.BASHEER, CHELERI KOMATH HOUSE, CHALAPURAM, NADAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.ASOKAN RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY S.I. OF POLICE, NADAPURAM POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.HEMA, J. ---------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.3722 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 21st June, 2010. O R D E R This petition is for bail. 2. The alleged offences are under Sections 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act and Sections 3 and 5 of the Explosive Substance Act. According to prosecution, on 24.10.2009, at about 8.30 p.m., while Circle Inspector of Police was patrolling along with police party, petitioner (first accused) along with three other persons hurled explosives to the police jeep, resulting in damage to the jeep. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the incident happened on 24.10.2009, but petitioner was arrested from Bangalore only on 7.5.2010. Petitioner is implicated in two other crimes, after the arrest. The second and third accused are on bail, in the same crime. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that this is second application by petitioner. He is in custody for the past 45 days. It is also submitted that third accused had only limited role BA NO.3722/10 2 in the offence. He was only the person who had arranged money for purchase of bomb, but petitioner was present at the scene and he had committed the offences. The other accused are yet to be arrested. It is further submitted that petitioner is involved in two other crimes of similar nature. 5. On hearing both sides and considering the serious nature of the allegations made and the fact that petitioner is involved in three cases of similar nature, I am not inclined to grant bail to petitioner at this stage. Petition is dismissed. K.HEMA, JUDGE. tgs