IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 15502 of 2009 Between: 1 Shakeela Jamali, W/o. NIsar Ahmed Jamali, R/o. H.NO. 20-4-973/7A, Khana Bagh, Chowk, Charminar, Hyderabad. 2 Mohd. Aethsham Jamali, S/o. NIsar Ahmed Jamali, R/o. H.NO. 20-4-973/7A, Khana Bagh, Chowk, Charminar, Hyderabad. 3 Quaes Jamali, S/o. Nisar Ahmed Jamali, R/o. H.No. 20-4-973/7A, Khana Bagh, Chowk, Charminar, Hyderabad. Rep. by his GPA and Mother Shakeela Jamali, W/o. Nisar Ahmed Jamali, Aged about 70 Years, Occ: House wif R/o. H.NO. 20- 4-973/7A, Khana Bagh, Chowk, Charminar, Hydera ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Collector, Ranga Reddy District, at Lakdi Ka Pul, Hyderabad. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 4 The Mandal Surveyor, Land Measurement & Records, Having his Office at M.R.O., Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 5 Smt. Jarina Begum, W/o.Not Known to the Petitioners R/o. Opp Bus Stand, Beside Mosque, Shamshabad (V) & (M), Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or directino more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent No.3 and 4 in issuing impugned notice NO. G/863/09, dated 25-07-2009 issued by respondent No.4 for conducting a survey and fixing boundary stores in Sy.No. 204 of Shamshabad village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District on 31-07-2009 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of Natural Justice Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.MOHD.ZIA-UL-HAQ Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO.15502 OF 2009 ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 31st JULY, 2009. *TSNR