IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3974 of 2011 BIRENDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.03.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Prosecutor for the State. At the very outset, it is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that in course of trial the informant as well as her husband resiled from the previous statement and they have not supported the prosecution story. Although, there is allegation against the petitioner that he along with other accused tried to commit rape on the informant, but considering the statement of informant as well as her husband which have been recorded in course of trial, I think it proper to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner, let the petitioner, namely, Birendra Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Jehanabad in Sessions Trial No.3 of 2011 arising out of Arwal P.S. Case No.133 of 2010. 2 It is pointed out by learned counsel for petitioner that in prayer portion in place of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Jehanabad it has wrongly been written as A.C.J.M, Danapur. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion within course of the day. PN ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)