1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 115 OF 2009 M/s. India Infoline Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Aarti Gunjikar ...Respondent. WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 117 OF 2009 M/s. India Infoline Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Satish Gunjikar ...Respondent. WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO. 245 OF 2009 Satish Gunjikar ...Petitioner. Vs. M/s. India Infoline Ltd ...Respondent. WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO. 246 OF 2009 Aarti Gunjikar ...Petitioner. Vs. M/s. India Infoline Ltd ...Respondent. Mr. Shashikant Chandak with Mr. Deepak Dhane for the Petitioner in Arbitration Petition No.115/2009 and 117/2009 and Respondent in Arbitration Petition (L) No. 245/2009 and Arbitration Petition (L) 246/2009. Ms. Aarti Gunjikar Respondent in person in Arbitration Petition No. 115/2009, and in Arbitration Petition No. 117 of 2009 and Petitioner in 2 Arbitration Petition (L) No. 246/2009. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 23rd JULY, 2009. P.C.- 1 The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner in Arbitration Petition Nos. 115/2009 and 117/2009 and Respondent in Arbitration Petition (L) Nos. 245/2009 and 246/2009 (M/s. Indiainfoline Ltd.) makes statement that the parties have settled the matter out of the Court and paid Rs.18,00,000/- (Rupees eighteen lacs only) accordingly. The Respondent in Arbitration Petition Nos. 115/2009 and 117/2009 and Petitioner in Arbitration Petition (L) Nos. 245/2009 and 246/2009, who is appearing in person also makes statement that they have settled the matter and received the said amount of Rs. 18,00,000/- (Rupees eighteen lacs only). However, some amount is lying with the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE), which need to be paid by NSE, subject to application or demand by the Respondent in Arbitration Petition Nos. 115/2009 and 117/2009. 2 In view of this, as parties have settled the matters out of the Court, all the Petitions are disposed of as settled. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)