IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 16TH AUGUST 2011 / 25TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 5365 of 2010(U) ------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ THE UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE UNIVESITY OF KERALA, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, KERALA UTY. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CITY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SREEKARIYAM POLICE STATION, SREEKARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. VIJAYAKUMAR ALIAS THANKAN, MOHANAVILASOM, PANGAPPARA.P.O, KARIAVATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. WP(C).No. 5365 of 2010(U) -2- 5. O.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, SREEVILASOM, PANGAPPARA, KARIYAVATTOM, CONVENOR, ACTION COUNCIL, KARIYAVATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.B.RAMAN PILLAI FOR R5 SRI.R.ANIL FOR R5 SRI.ANIL K.MOHAMMED FOR R5 SRI.SUJESH MENON V.B. FOR R5 SRI.JOSEPH P.ALEX FOR R5 SRI.SHYAM ARAVIND FOR R5 SRI.T.ANIL KUMAR FOR R5 SRI.B.RAMAN PILLAI FOR R4 SRI.R.ANIL FOR R4 SRI.ANIL K.MOHAMMED FOR R4 SRI.SUJESH MENON V.B. FOR R4 SRI.JOSEPH P.ALEX FOR R4 SRI.SHYAM ARAVIND FOR R4 SRI.T.ANIL KUMAR FOR R4 GOVT. PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ W. P. C. No.5365 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J It is submitted on behalf of the counsel for the petitioner that at the moment there is no threat of any Dharna or agitation against the construction of compound wall by the University. It was submitted by the counsel for the respondents also that they do not propose to stage any Dharna in front of the office of the University. We record the submissions of the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the respondent and dispose of the Writ Petition noticing that civil suits are pending in respect of the compound wall construction. It is needless to mention that this judgment will not prevent the petitioner from moving this Court again for issuance of any fresh direction if found necessary. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE C. K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE kns/- -2-