IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.596 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 16.09.2009 Sunil Kumar .....Petitioner versus Lal Chand and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Ajay Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Jain, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition has been filed with a limited prayer. The petitioner-tenant has moved an application for amendment of the written statement before the Appellate Authority, Hisar but instead of deciding the same, it has been ordered by the Appellate Authority that the same can be heard with the main appeal. The petitioner-tenant wants the said application for amendment to be decided before the main appeal. Notice of motion was issued and pursuant thereto, counsel for the parties have been heard. C.R. No.596 of 2009 (O&M) 2 Having regard to the amendment sought by the petitioner, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the Appellate Authority, Hisar, to firstly decide the application for amendment of the written statement moved by the petitioner-tenant and thereafter to take up the main appeal for final hearing. The Appellate Authority is further directed to decide the application for mesne profit moved by the respondent-landlord before the final decision of the appeal. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. Dasti. 16-09-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE