((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7838 OF 2005 Madhukar Manohar Prabhakar Applicant versus State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Sachin Shetye with Sagar Kasar for applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP for respondent. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 2nd December 2005 PC : 1. Mentioned. Not on board. 2. Heard Shri Shetye for applicant and Shri Saste for respondent. 3. This application can be disposed of at this stage itself. All that the applicant seeks is interim protection till the application for anticipatory bail preferred by him is finally disposed of by the learned Sessions Judge. The interim anticipatory bail granted, has been rejected inasmuch as the said order is vacated ((-2-)) because the applicant could not attend the Court. Shri Shetye brings to my notice the Medical Certificate pertaining to the ailment of the applicant’s wife. She is undergoing Dialysis and now requires blood transfusion. It is in these circumstances that he could not remain present before the Sessions Judge. 4. The learned Sessions Judge to consider the applicant’s plea for exemption for day to day appearance or whenever the anticipatory bail application is adjourned. In my view, considering the application and it’s annexures, this is a fit case where the interim order passed by the Trial Court should be continued. Accordingly, it is directed that the interim anticipatory bail granted by the Trial Court would continue till the main application is heard by the Sessions Judge. The applicant, however, to remain present before the Sessions Judge on 6th December 2005 and apply for personal exemption. Hearing of the main application is expedited. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)