HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10783 of 2005 Date : 12.11.2009 Between : Smt. K. Lakshmikanthamma & another. …..Petitioners And Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Ministry of Home & others. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10783 of 2005 ORDER : In this writ petition, the petitioners seek directions by way of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of respondents 1 and 2 in controlling the fraud and cheating against the interest of public, as illegal, and to direct respondents 1 and 2 to investigate into the matter and initiate proper action against the culprits. 2. As stated in the affidavit, it is the case of the petitioners that M/s.Aparna Apparels (P) Ltd. has obtained a loan of Rs.1 Crore from the 3rd respondent-bank. The 2nd petitioner’s husband was also one of the Directors of the said Company. Petitioners stood as guarantors to secure the aforesaid loan and have mortgaged their properties. It is the case of the petitioners that the Chairman of the Company by name G. Venkateswara Rao and the Managing Director Smt. G.Padmaja, have also mortgaged their properties to the 3rd respondent- bank while availing the loan by M/s.Aparna Apparels (P) Ltd., but subsequently, the said properties were sold away by them in collusion with the 3rd respondent-bank. In the writ petition, it is the grievance of the petitioners that inspite of bringing to the notice of the bank about the said cheating committed by the promoters of the Company by name G.Venkateswara Rao, Chairman and Smt.G.Padmaja, Managing Director, no steps have been taken by the respondents. Hence, the petitioners seek directions for investigation of the said fraud, by the Central Bureau of Investigation. 3. Though the petitioners have made serious allegations against the Chairman and also the Managing Director of the Company in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, but curiously, they are not even made party-respondents to the writ petition. Any directions in this writ petition will seriously affect the rights of such persons whose names are referred to in the affidavit, but they are not made parties to the writ petition. In that view of the matter, without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 12th November 2009 ajr