IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 25684 of 2008 Between: Ch.Appalanaidu S/o.late China Babu 7-107-7, Cheepurupalli St., Bobbili, Vizianagaram District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1.The Maripivalasa Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, Maripivalasa, Seethanagaram Mandal Vizianagaram District, Andhra Pradesh. 2.The Divisional Cooperative Officer, Vizianagaram/Parvathipuram Division, Vizianagaram. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, direction or a writ one in the nature Mandamus declaring the action of (i) the 1st respondent in not paying the retirement benefits (ii) the 2nd respondent in not ordering the 1st respondent and that in replying that its office not paying salary but the 1st respondent, deviating from the letter dated 24.09.2007 addressed by it to 1st respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, and consequently direct the respondents to pay the retrial benefits of the petitioner as claimed in his representation dt. 23.07.2007 in accordance with the bye law relating to the service conditions for employees of the Primary Agricultural Cooperative societies approved by RC No.31811/2005/116(c)/2, dt. 03.10.2005 forthwith along with interest from the date of entitlement to the date payment to be made by the 1st respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.SRINIVASA SARMA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.25684 of 2008 Order: The petitioner states that on 30.60.2007, he retired from service as Paid Secretary of the first respondent-Society on attaining superannuation and that he made a representation on 23.07.2007 to the first respondent requesting him to pay the retiral benefits. It is his grievance that till date, neither the retiral benefits have been paid to him nor any orders have been passed thereon. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Cooperation appearing for the respondents, and at their request, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal, at the admission stage. Inasmuch as the representation made by the petitioner is pending consideration, it would be appropriate to direct the first respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 23.07.2007, expeditiously. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 25.11.2008 VGB