IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.6151 of 2011 Lalita Rani Vs. IBP Co.Limited, Chandigarh & others Present: Mr.Raj Paul Kansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner claims to be having a better merit for allotment of L.P.G . distributorship and has accordingly filed this writ petition to challenge the allotment in favour of respondent No.3. Bald assertions are made in the petition to say that the petitioner has not been properly assessed so far as infrastructure and other aspects are concerned. The primary ground raised by the petitioner is that she is better educationally qualified. That is one aspect of the issue, which is taken into consideration. As the petitioner had relied upon the finances of his father-in-law and so also for infrastructure, which apparently could not have been validly taken into consideration to assess the merit of the petitioner. Nothing else is pointed out before me to show the merit of the petitioner being more than the respondent, who has been allotted this L.P.G.Distributorship. There is no merit in the writ petition. The same is accordingly dismissed. April 06, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE