[7 @ '&€ Maw/7; IN THE HIGH COURT OF BILASPUR AT CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION (S) No. $§3I OF 2009 PETITIONER / Ku. Jageshwari Baghel, D/o. Bulchand Baghel, aged about 45 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Gotiyardih, Block Abhanpur, District Raipur (C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary Education Department, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C. G.) District Education Officer, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, (C. G.). ,3) Block Education Officer, Abhanpur, Distt. Raipur, (C. G.). w WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA v \APC9’5$1>1 . zeaa mmoimm mazma' spa w ‘ I WW “ ‘tn'a’a‘Wfg‘vi - Ifmx i £53imané¥r $3 : HGN’BLE SHRE JU$TECE E?RITENKER EEWAKEER 17.Q‘7’.2’3Q9 Shri Shz‘i Ajay Somkant Dwivedi, Verma DyfGVA "Ohnm f0; £01 the t} ételta, e Qetitiomar. Challenge in ’Ehe prese‘nt petition is to the order daterjl 39062009 paSééd by respondemt No.2 by which the petitioner who is working as Upper DiwSion Teacher at Govt. Miédle School Gotiyadih, Block Abhanour 'has been mansferred to Govt, Middie Sohooi, Jhirripani, Biook Deobhog. Contention of counsel £01 the petitioner is that in her present place of posting she has joineci in the month of October 2008 but within less than ten months sheihas been shifted. Further it has been submitted that no one has been posted in place of the petitioner and this itself shows that there is 1" administrative exigenc r 101“ issuing the transfer ordert i Counsei for the State submits that let the eetitioner make a representation to the respondent No.2 and the same would be decided in accordance with iaw. Counsel for the petitioner agrees to make a representation. However he submits that tii'i her representation is decided. the petitioner may be given some proteetive order. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representation within a period of ten days from the date .of receipt of the copy ,‘f th's order, the same Wouid be decided within a period of three weeks from the date oi its receipt. T‘iii then the impugned order shaii not be given effect to. iwaker i ’/( e Sdl- ' Prit'mker D Judge wewwwawmu f’ ,i . m,— . m ~... V /