IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2011 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 10333 of 2011() --------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 83/2003 OF CHITANIKKAL POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT .................. PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED: --------------------------------------- VALLIYIL MANOJ, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.THOMAS ,VALLIYIL VEEDU, MALANKADAVU, PALAVAYAL VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD. BY ADVS. SMT.LATHA PRABHAKARAN SRI.K.M.JAMALUDHEEN RESPONDENT(S) / COMPLAINANT-STATE: -------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. K. K. RAJEEV THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIION ON 19/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: VPV V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No.10333 of 2011 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 19 th December,2011 ORDER Petitioner, who is the sole accused in S.C.No.355 of 2010 on the file of Additional Sessions Court (Adhoc-III), Kasaragod and Crime No.83 of 2003 of Chitanikkal Police Station, Kasaragod District, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Admittedly non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Court below and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the court below and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and B.A.No.10333 OF 2011 2 disposed of, preferably, on the same date on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner. This Bail Application is, accordingly, disposed of. V. RAMKUMAR JUDGE cms