WP(C) 1763/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Patow ary, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. It is the contention of the petitioner that though pursuant to the vario us work orders issued, he successfully completed the works and submitted the bil ls from time to time, an amount of Rs.3,85,601/- is still due and payable to the petitioner against the aforesaid works, which has not been paid. Mr. Patowary, learned counsel for the respondents, on the basis of the i nstruction received, has submitted that the petitioner’s name has been enlisted in the register in 6(six) different places based on the 6(six) different bills s ubmitted by him. It has been submitted that the petitioner’s name appears at Sl. Nos.195, 350, 382, 2170, 2272 and 2340. It is also the contention of the learne d counsel that against the amount payable in respect of the aforesaid 6(six) bil ls, certain amount has been paid leaving the balance of Rs.2,14,042/- to be paya ble to the petitioner, which would be paid in terms of the position of the petit ioner in the list prepared pursuant to the decision of this Court in Tamsher Ali Vs. State of Assam and ors. reported in 2008(4) GLT 1. In view of the aforesaid position and in view of the Full Bench decision of this Court in Tamsher Ali’s case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to clear the outstanding dues to the pe titioner in terms of the position in the list prepared for that purpose. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.