w f^ c^s-^TQ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fC) No. 1A?% /2008 PETITIONERS ^ ,^\ V^ A-f ->y G^?-"'^X\ A^. ^y e r>:.-' *7" ^' ^ $' ^- ^\.y RESPONDENTS 'REOtNE:^ '^-i^ l^ c^ 1. Yogendra Kumar Shukla, S/o. Shri Shiv Kumar Shukla, age 3g years, Room No.ll, Government College of Education, Bilaspur (C.G.). 2. Bishol Ram, S/o. Late Bhambha Ram, age 40 years above, Room No.3, Government College of Education, Bilaspur (C.G.). 3. Yakub Khalko, S/o. Lawrence Khalko, age 35 years, Room No.l, Government College of Education, Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Gury^ Ghasi Das University, Through its Registrar, Bilaspur (C.G-). ^3. Director, State Education Research & Training Council, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.). ,4. Principle, Government Education College, Bilaspur (C.G.). ^' 'i*«^i*u:%;' ^. ^ (S> 5. National Council for Teacher Education - A statutory Body of Government of India, Western Region Committee - Through its Regional Director, Manas Bhavan, Shyamla Hills, Bhopal (M.P). WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. h HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0.1958 OF 2008 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS Yogendra Kumar Shukla & Others Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Vinit Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate for the respondent No.2. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 2nd day of December, 2010) 1. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, if new cause of action survives. 2. No objection from other side. 3. It is ordered, as prayed for. 4. In view of foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed withdrawn. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Arun