IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 10556 of 2008 Between: Kum. A Sree Devi, D/o. A.Prakasham, R/o. H.No.16-1-27/BC/24, Flat No.T7, Tirumala Apartment, Jaya Nagar, Road No.5, Saidabad, Hyderabad, A.P., ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Employees' Provident Fund Organization, Rep by its Commissioner, Barkatpura, HYDERABAD-500 027 2 Employees' Provident Fund Organization; Rep by its Asst.P.F.Commissioner,(FPF) Barkatpura, Hyderabad, 27 3 Electronic Corporation of India Limited, Rep by its Personnel Officer Control & Automation Group, ECIL, HYDERABAD - 500 062. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Letter No. A.P.3260/1898/Pension/AG- 31/2005/827 dated 29-9-2005, as illegal, arbitrary, null and void and consequently direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to pay/ the monthly pension to the Petitioner on the basis of nomination form of Pension submitted by the Late Madan Mohan during the year 2002 before the 3rd Respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt.R.KAMESWARI Counsel for the respondents: Sri Y. Ravindra The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.10556 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This Writ Petition is ﬁled seeking a Mandamus declaring letter No.AP/3260/1898/Pension/AG-31/2005/827, dated 29-9- 2005 addressed by the 2nd respondent to the Secretary, M/s. ECIL EPF Trust, Hyderabad as arbitrary and illegal and consequently to direct respondents 1 and 2 to pay monthly pension to the petitioner on the basis of nomination form of pension submitted by late Madan Mohan during the year 2002 before the 3rd respondent. It appears, though the petitioner was shown as a nominee of late A. Madan Mohan, the respondents have not released the monthly pension to her. There is no necessity of going into all the details. Now, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed before this Court, a copy of the letter dated 26-6-2008 addressed by the 2nd respondent to the petitioner showing release of monthly pension to the petitioner. In view of the above, nothing survives in the Writ Petition for further adjudication. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. 16-9-2008 prk