CWP No. 532 of 2000 with CWP Nos. 314, 652 and 99 of 2005, 156, 265, 451 and 465 of 2006. CWP No. 532 of 2000. 21.4. 2008 Present: Mr. K.D. Sood, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondent- State. Mr. Navlesh Verma, counsel for respondent No.5. CWP No. 314 of 2005. Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondent- State. Mr. R.K.Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Naveen Bhardwaj, counsel for the respective respondents. CWP No. 652 of 2005 Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondent- State. Mr. R.K.Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Naveen Bhardwaj, counsel for the respective respondents. CWP No. 99 of 2005 Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 8. Mr. A.K.Gaur, counsel for the respective respondents. CWP No. 156 of 2006 Mr. R.L.Sood, Sr. Advocate, Mr. R.K.Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikas Rajput, Naveen Bhardwaj, B.C. Negi, A.K.Gaur, Advocates, for the petitioners. Mr. R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondents-State. Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan , counsel for respective respondents. CWP No. 265 of 2006. Mr. R.K.Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Naveen Bhardwaj, Suneet Goel, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondents-State. CWP No. 451 of 2006. Mr. R.L.Sood, Sr. Advocate, Mr. R.K.Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikas Rajput, Naveen Bhardwaj, Advocates, for the petitioners. Mr. R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondents-State. Mr. Ashok Sharma vice counsel for respective respondent(s). CWP No. 465 of 2006. Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for respondents-State. Mr. R.K.Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Naveen Bhardwaj, counsel for the respective respondents. All the above writ petitions are being disposed of by a common order since they have a common question of law. These writ petitions are regarding inconvenience caused to the industrialists with respect to transportation of goods. We have been informed that a detailed interim order has already been passed on 18.5.2001 in CMP No. 926 of 2000 filed in CWP No. 532 of 2000. The learned Advocate General states that much water has been flown from the said date and the law and order situation has definitely improved which according to him is evident from the proceedings of the meeting held under the Chairmanship of Principal Secretary (Transport) to the Govt. of H.P. dated 6.6.2007 alongwith an affidavit of Additional Chief Secretary (Transport) to the Govt. of H.P. dated 23rd July, 2007. The interest of justice will suffice in case all the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of interim order dated 18th May, 2001 passed in CMP No. 926 of 2000 filed in CWP No. 532 of 2000 with a direction to the State Government to take necessary steps by issuing directions to all the District Police Chiefs in the State. With these observations all the writ petitions are disposed of, so also all other pending applications. The Truck Unions have also assured this court that they will not disturb the transportation of materials. ( Jagdish Bhalla ), Chief Justice. April 21, 2008. ( Kuldip Singh ), (Hem/s) Judge.