IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.937 of 2007 GOPAL JHA Versus VIMLA DEVI ----------- 2 10/9/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. The impugned order refusing to allow prayer of the petitioner to delete his name and substitute the name of the alleged purchaser of the vehicle, in the opinion of this Court does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. In a claim petition it was the concern and prerogative of the claimant to implead the owner of the vehicle as per the entries made in this regard in owner book of the vehicle. It is also clear from the impugned order that on the date of accident i.e. 24.5.2005 the owner of the vehicle as entered into the owner book was none else but the petitioner alone. Therefore, as to what had transpired between the petitioner and alleged purchaser prior to change the name in the owner book on 17.7.2005 will have no bearing on the claim filed by claimant opposite party because accident had taken 2 place on 24.5.2005 and on that day in the eye of law it was petitioner who was the owner of the vehicle. That being so, this Court does not find any error in the impugned order refusing to strike off the name of the petitioner in the claim case filed by the claimant opposite party by replacing the name of alleged purchaser. Accordingly this Civil Revision application being devoid of any merit is hereby dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. ) Abhay Kumar