IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7836 of 2009 Date of decision : 21.1.2010 Ruldu Ram and another ....Petitioners Versus Gulshan Sethi ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. G.S.Sandhawalia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. M.S.Sachdeva, Advocate for the Caveator. S. D. ANAND, J. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners argues, inter-alia, that judgment recorded by the Appellate Authority has to be invalidated for the simple reason that it (judgment) does not, at all, contain a proper discussion of the points under adjudication. Notice of motion. Mr. M.S.Sachdeva, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent is not in a position to contest the factual aspect of the averment made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. It is apparent from a perusal of the impugned judgment that it does not contain the normally expected level of discussion about the points of controversy. The petition shall stand allowed. The judgment recorded by the learned Appellate Authority shall stand set aside. The learned Appellate Authority shall proceed to dispose of the matter afresh within fifteen days from 1.2.2010. The parties, through their learned counsel, are directed to appear before the learned District Judge, Jalandhar on 1.2.2010 On consensual basis, it is ordered that the appeal shall be retained by the learned District Judge, Jalandhar on his own Board. Disposed of accordingly. January 21, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE