IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 3RD MARCH 2011 / 12TH PHALGUNA 1932 OP(Crl.).No. 794 of 2011(Q) --------------------------- [VC.NO.20/2009 OF THE ENQUIRY COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL JUDGE,TRICHUR] .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- S.MURUGAR SELVI, W/O. LATE E.SATHEESH KUMAR, 144-145, DPF STREET, PAPPANAICKENPALAYAM, COIMBATORE-37, TAMIL NADU. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ANIL RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR, VIGILANCE & ANTI- CORRUPTION BUREAU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VIGILANCE & ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, TRICHUR – 680 001. 4. COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695 001. 5. NITHISH SIDHAN, S/O.V.K.SIDDAN, VELUMBATH HOUSE, CHENTHRAPPINNI P.O., CHAVAKKAD TALUK, TRICHUR DISTRICT – 680 164. 6. T.K.SAJEEVAN, S/O.LATE KRISHNAN, THASHNATH HOUSE,CHENTRAPPINNI, THRISSUR – 680 210. 7. SMT.RUKMINI, W/O.LATE ESWARA MOORTHY, THATTANTHOTTAM, NAMBIAMPALAYAM P.O., AVANASI VIA., KOVAI, TAMILNADU DISTRICT. 8. RAPHEL, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, STATE EXCISE ACADEMY AND RESEARCH CENTRE, TRICHUR – 680 001. R1 TO R4 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. M.K. PUSHPALATHA. THIS OP (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/03/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J. ==================================== O.P(Crl.) No.794 of 2011 ==================================== Dated this the 03rd March, 2011 J U D G M E N T I had disposed of this case by dictating my judgment on 25.02.2011. But before signing the judgment I thought it necessary to hear learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor further. Accordingly they were heard. Judgment disposing of the case is recalled. 2. In this petition, petitioner prays that a direction may be issued to respondent No.2 to give sanction to file the final report in VC No.20 of 2009 on the file of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Thrissur and a further direction to respondent No.2 to report the matter to respondent No.4 in order to take appropriate action against respondent Nos.5 to 8. 3. Dispute concerned constitution of a Partnership firm after death of the husband of petitioner. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that in view of the proceedings of Commissioner of Excise, Thiruvananthapuram (Order No.XL6- O.P(CRL.) No.794 of 2011 -: 2 :- 472/05 dated 26.02.2011) which the petitioner claimed to have received on 01.03.2011 this petition is not pressed. In the light of the submission made by learned counsel this petition is dismissed as not pressed without prejudice to other rights of petitioner. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. vsv