IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.537 of 2010 1. MD.EHJAMUDDIN @ MD.MUNNA 2. Md. Hira @ Md Meera …Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3. 22.02.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioners in a Police case under Sections 302, 120B of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act is that the FIR is against unknown. Learned Counsel for the State from the case diary is unable to point out any material with regard to the nature of the bullet/pillet recovered from the person of the deceased compatible with the weapon seized from the petitioners and the comparative report of the seized weapon from Forensic Science Laboratory. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Bhagalpur in Kotwali (Tatarpur) PS Case No. 270 of 2009. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)