IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 6808 of 2003 Between: P.Yadaiah S/o. P.Jangaiah R/o. H.No.1-9-312/6/A4, Vijay Pratap Apartments, Atchuta Marg, Vidya Nagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad. Near Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 2 The Assistant Town Planning Officer Circle-III, Municipal Corporation Of Hyderabad. MCH Complex, Abids, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent 1 to 2 in the not Sanctioning the approved plan permitting this Petitioner, to construct the shop as per the plan as highly illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional contrary to the provision of Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act,1955 and violative of Articles 14 & 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent 1 & 2 to grant the premission by approving the plan submitted for construction of shop in the scheduled property by this petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.MURALI KRISHNA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following : ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J. 01st July, 2009. skmr