c.', ^\°° 3 'fsy- ^ K'^ ^ ^v IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. 4^-61 OF 2005 ^..^i^. PETITIONER ^••- Chamru Ram Verma, S/o. R.S. Verma aged about 54 years, R/o Tahsilpara Bijapur Tahsit - Bijapur District - Dantewara (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through The Secretar/ ( Forest), DKS Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) / 2 The Chief Conserveror of Forest (Wild Life) Chhattisgat-h, Raipur (C.G.) / 3. The Additional Chief Conservetor of Forest (Administration) Chhattisgarh, Raipur(C.G-) - WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT / WRITS, ORDER / ORDERS DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS ETC. IN ^ *<T*i^T^'n^ ^T^I -qi«lrt^,yTyi'(-i<i4, Rrti^y^ rf7K .. tjr....^ ?.? f /?.^ w^^T^rRafq? ^TT^?Trf)^Jcb •^ v\ 31^911^ (I3crf^Rf) ^200 ?T?ITW^fl?T3TT^$T 19/10/2005 Shri Satish Chandre petitioner, Shri Aruii Sao, Dy. advaiice copy. Heard. Leanied coiinsel fo3 petitioner was appouited as fhe year 1982. Since 19^ unobstonictively. He furthei period of service, the case not been coiisidered. Referting leamed counsel szibmits th^ (Wild Life) has also recomi regularisation vide his coverjj after fhis, his case has not b( For the pre.sent, leara| fhis petition niay be dispos^ file a detailed representatio| the concemed autiiority lujf representation withia fhe st|j: This lim.ited prayer petitioner is not opposed by| The sanie. is aILowed. <hl^lCT<TlTi +ll+lc^T^rfe^^R|^dH ^arf^TSTT^^T Verm.a, leamed coiuisel for the A, for respondent Nos.l, 2 & 3 on the petitioner subniits tliat the ^ Daily Wager on flie post ofDriver ia ?2, he is workiag on fhe. said post submits ttiat even after snch a long f the petitioner for regzilai'isation has to fhe docume.nt (Aunexure P-5), lt tiie then Chief Conservator of Forest lended the case of fhe petitioner for ngmemodated 16/7/2002. But even xen considered. kd coiuisel for the petitioner prays that ;d of with a Uberty to the petitioner to before the concenied aiitliority and IY be directed to dispose of his 3ulated period graiited by fhis Coiirt. inade by leanied coiinsel for fhe samed counsel for the. State, SP/FS/2005-20,000 XI-HC-78 HI*I<AI a?w^ ^TOi r^l^lc^-y, vTilxi<i<»,RrtK-r^x .^£..^(OUQr^.. 311^$T q^P(yit3<si<s) ^200 3n^$T^rR<rii<h ^nan^^T^yicN / / ^ ^^ y ^^ g^iTW[^rf^T3n^^r It is directed that if s<^ detadled representation along^i Writ Petition before fhe conc^nied weeks irom today aad if s| concenletf aufhority shatl dis^ preferably wiflim a period of8| of fhe aforesaid represeutat|( recommendation by fhe local 41 dated 16/7/2002 (Annexiire P} The petition staads fmalty advised, fhe petitioner may file a Ith a copy of fhis order ancl a copy of authority within a penod of 4 ich a representation is fUed, tlie ose of the same as early as possible weeks from tlie date offiluig/receipt ou by him keepmg m mmd tlie .utlionty of fhe petitionervide memo 5). _ disposed of Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge <hl^(^41r144!^c^' ^f^CSt ^Fjtx-$i<< ^3Tf^T3II^?T