^. J. HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH, BILASPUR W.P. (SlNo. 7617/2007 Smt. Pushpa Rai @ Pusttpa Choiiksey, W/o Shri B.P. Rai, aged about 53 years, Post Head Master, Govt. Middle School, Gondpara, Block Bitha, Distt. BUaspur (C.G). yersus State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, through fhe Secretary, Department ofEdiication, Maatraiaya, D.K.S, Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Of&cer, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G) 1, 2. e: Shri K.S. Pawar, Counsel for fhe petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Pauel Lawyer for the State/'respondents on advance copy. 120.12.2007) SimiL KUJvIARSIHHA,^J Heard on adinission. Leamed couasel for the petitioner subiaits that fhe petitioner has.passed B.Ed., examiaation on her own expenses, fh.erefore, she is entiUed to receive two advaace iacreinents accordiag to circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 01.03.1999. He also subinits fhat ia inany identical inatters, tlie petitions have been allowed ra tenns of fhe order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar BheiraSww Vs. Minicifftil CoriJoraUon, Durfi and 96?. He subniits fhat fhe case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said judgnient. This legal position is not disputed by tlie leamed counsel for fhe State. However, be submits that fhe order may be passed in tenns of fhe said judgiuent, but it shatl be subject to verification regardiag petitioner's siich quaiification. -2- W.P(S)No.7617/07 ^ Accordiagly, fhis writ petition is allowed ia temis of tbe order passed ia case of Yashwant Kuniar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of the facts as to whefher fhe petitioner had acquired B.Ed., Examination Certi&cate on her ownexpenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 & 01.03.1999 aud farther whether she has been paid two advance increinents or not. The petition staads finaUy disposed of. No ori.er as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sistha Judse /L.30/