1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.5282 of 2007. [Vidarbha Sikshan Prasarak Mandal thro its Secretary and another] Vs. [Vitthal Bhikaji Raut and others] ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri Apurv A. De, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram: A. H. JOSHI, J. Dated: 15th January 2008. 1. While considering the application for condonation of delay, Learned School Tribunal adverted to the facts of case. Considering the application for condonation of delay is not a ministerial or mechanical action. 2. Learned Tribunal was bound to take the grasp and resume on merits of the case. 3. The litigant who is not properly advised has furnished his application for condonation of delay in a improper manner, and it is not 2 properly drafted. For such lack of proficiency, the litigant can hardly be blamed. The manner in which the Tribunal has exercised the jurisdiction, and was impressed due to the illegality on the part of management and has found that considering the balance of justice, the delay needs to be condoned. This Judgment is neither shocking or is in erroneous exercise of jurisdiction. It cannot be said that learned Tribunal has lost sight of the objectivity. The order impugned tends to do justice. 4. No interference is, therefore, called for. 5/ Petition is dismissed. JUDGE Sbm