1 S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2026/2008 Smt. Meera Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 11.7.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Jaidev Singh Bhati, for the petitioner. Mr. R.R. Kanwar, for the respondents. ... This petition for writ is preferred to assail the order dated 23.1.2008 passed by the Child Development Project Officer, Bhadra, Hanumangarh cancelling selection of the petitioner as Anganwari Karamchari at village 11 BHD. The order impugned does not provide any reason for cancellation of selection, however, in reply to the writ petition it is stated by the respondents that appointment at 11 BHD could have been made only from amongst the bonafide residents of that village and the petitioner not being a bonafide resident of 11 BHD, was not entitled for selection, therefore, her selection was cancelled. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out the document Annexure-2 issued by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bhadra certifying that the petitioner is a resident of village 11 BHD. As per the petitioner she is bonafide resident of village 11 BHD and if the respondents would have given her an opportunity she would have satisfied them about the factum of her residence at 11 BHD. 2 It is not in dispute that before cancellation no opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner. The respondents before cancelling selection of the petitioner should have provided an opportunity to her to convey her version about the bonafide residence. Looking to the factual position stated above I consider it appropriate to set-aside the order dated 23.1.2008 with a liberty to the respondents to take appropriate decision with regard to selection of the petitioner after affording an opportunity to her to satisfy regarding her place of residence. The writ petition is disposed of in the terms above. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal