IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 7282 of 2008. Decided on 02.08.2010. _________________________________________________ Jaisi Ram. …Petitioner. -Versus- The Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Ranjan Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client may be permitted to make a representation for the redressal of his grievance. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a representation for the redressal of his grievance, i.e., for the release of interim relief on pension within a period of three weeks from today. Thereafter, the same shall be decided by the respondent-Board/competent authority within a further period of ten weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. Needless to add that if the representation of the petitioner is favourably considered by the respondent-Board, he will be entitled to all the consequential benefits. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge August 02, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.