:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.625 OF 2008 IN SESSIONS CASE NO.935 OF 2006 Balaji Vishwanath Mane. ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. Mr.B.J.Sarwade for the Appolicant. Mrs. M.H.Mhatre, APP. for the State. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATED : 7th March, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an application for transfer of the case from the court of Shri. K.P.Purohit, Sessions Judge, Kurla. It is contended that defence lawyer was the Secretary of the City Civil & Sessions Court, Mumbai and when he was the Secretary resolution was passed for removal of Judge who is hearing the present sessions case with some other Judges and therefore, Judge must be harassing the defence lawyer. This contention is vague and cannot be accepted. 2. The other grievance is that the charge in this case is not framed by the concerned Judge. It is seen that the matter has been sent to the said Sessions Court on 10.1.2007. It is seen that thereafter matter was appeared on board when A.P.P. was absent. On 13.6.2007 when the matter appeared on board the court :2: was on leave. On 27.7.2007 court was also on leave. Some other notings on the roznama indicate the reason as to why the charge has not been framed. In the circumstances, non framing of charge which is the other ground made out in this case cannot be a reason to transfer the case. However, the Sessions Judge is directed to frame the charge immediately on the next date. Subject to above directions, application is rejected. (R.S.MOHITE, J.)