SB Crlmb No.4869/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B.CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.4869/2010. Amarjeet Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 20/5/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Manish Sharma for the petitioner. Shri Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor for State. ****** Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that petitioner has been involved in the present for offence under section 19/54A of the Rajasthan Excise Act only because he happens to be owner of the vehicle from which, contraband liquor was recovered. Liquor was in possession of co- accused Mangal Singh, who has already been enlarged on bail by the order of the co- ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Cr.Misc.Bail Application No.3494/2010 dated 29/4/2010, there is no previous criminal case ever registered against the petitioner, and he is in jail for quite some time. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. SB Crlmb No.4869/10. 2 Considering the submissions made at the bar, the nature of accusation, the materials on record and all other facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Amarjeet Singh S/o Shri Kuljeet Singh shall be released on bail in FIR No.33/2010 P.S. Bhinay for offence u/S.19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing until conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil