IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15639 of 2011 RAJNISH PRASAD AND ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 20.05.2011 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 406, 120B, 467, 468, 471 of the I.P.C. The accusation against the petitioners is that they executed sale deed in favour of the complainant but subsequently they disowned the sale deed for which a complaint was filed on behalf of the complainant’s side. Initially the complaint was dismissed by the learned Court below since the complainant failed to produce the sale deed in Court. The order of dismissal was challenged before the revisional Court and in pursuance to the revisional Court’s order cognizance has been taken. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that at the alleged date of time of execution of sale deed the petitioners were minor. Considering the nature of accusation and the fact that in the initial round the complaint was dismissed by the Court, let the petitioners namely 1. Rajnish Prasad 2. Vikash Prasad, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on 2 anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 2268 of 2009. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)