:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.235 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.235 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.235 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.224 OF 2005 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.224 OF 2005 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.224 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.358 OF 2005 SUMMARY SUIT NO.358 OF 2005 SUMMARY SUIT NO.358 OF 2005 Kantilal Vershi Shah .. Appellant Vs. Prashant H. Dave .. Respondent Mr.Shaikh With Sunil Waghmare for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. ----- CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 1ST AUGUST, 2006. DATE : 1ST AUGUST, 2006. DATE : 1ST AUGUST, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. The impugned order grants Unconditional Leave in a Summary Suit, hence Letters Patent Appeal is not maintainable. Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)