IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24920 of 2008 MUKESH YADAV @ MUKESH KUMAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 7 2.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that two witnesses have been named in the FIR but they are not examined and there is no other witness in the case save and except two brothers of the informant which state hearsay version. It is not the stage to consider the reason why FIR named witnesses are not examined but the allegation is there that is regarding last seen. Taking which into consideration two of the co-accused persons have been refused anticipatory bail and three of the co-accused persons have been refused regular bail by this Court. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of this petitioner is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI