WP(C) 5337/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B D AGARWAL Heard Mr. MJ Quadir, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B Ghosh, learned Government advocate for the respondents. The petitioner’s case is that he is possessing and cult ivating a plot of land admeasured 16 kathas of land covered by periodic Dag No. 199/420, Mouza- Tulagram Part-I . The petitioner’s further case is that the Cour t of Munsiff at Silchar had already passed a decree in T.S. No. 690 of 2006 and T.S. No.34 of 2009 and despite that the respondents are not issuing patta or mut ating his name. In my considered opinion, the High Court cannot become a n executing court of the decrees passed by a subordinate court. In other words, the petitioner has to approach the civil court to execute the decrees passed by it. In the result, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid directions.