LPA No.445 of 2009(O&M) #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.445 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Order: 8.7.2009 Karan Avtar Singh ...Petitioner Versus Devinder Singh and others ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. Rajive Atma Ram, Senior Advocate with Mr. Daman Dhir, Advocate for the appellant. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR,J This is an appeal filed under clause X of the Letters Patent challenging judgment dated 16.4.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge saddling the appellant with cost of Rs.50,000/- for his failure to ensure that correct and authenticated reply is filed in this Court. Shri Atma Ram, learned counsel for the appellant, inter-alia, has pointed out that while dealing with the appeal, a factual mistake has crept in the impugned order dated 16.4.2009 passed by learned Single Bench inasmuch as Sh. Karan Avtar Singh-appellant has already given up the charge of the post of Secretary, PWD (B&R), State of Punjab and Sh. Kulbir Singh had taken over the charge. It was Sh. Kulbir Singh, who had LPA No.445 of 2009(O&M) #2# appeared before the Division Bench on 4.11.2008 and, therefore, no information could be made to Sh. Karan Avtar Singh and the learned Single Judge has not correctly recorded the factual position in his order. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant, we are of the view that if there is any factual mistake in the order passed by the learned Single Judge, then remedy would be available to file application seeking review of the order on the factual aspect. Moreover, the factual mistake pointed out by learned counsel is not the only reason for passing the order in respect of the appellant. It is, therefore, for the learned Single Judge to review the whole thing after considering the factual position. In view of the above, present appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellant to move an appropriate application before the learned Single Judge seeking review of impugned order. If the review application is filed within one week along with an application seeking condonation of delay then the same shall be considered by the learned Single Judge keeping in view the fact that the appeal has been pending since 21.5.2009. In view of the disposal of the appeal, we do not feel the necessity of passing any order on the pending miscellaneous application. ( M.M. KUMAR ) JUDGE July 08, 2009 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE