IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 6289/2007 (Babulal Acharya Vs. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhilwara & Ors.) Date of judgment:- 25.10.2007 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA Mr. Gopal Acharya, for the petitioner. BY THE COURT:- This writ petition is directed against order dated 12.07.2007 passed by the Election Tribunal [Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhilwara], whereby an application preferred by the petitioner under Rule 82 of Rajasthan Panchayati Raj (Election) Rules, 1994 objecting the marking of the exhibits on the documents produced along with an affidavit, has been rejected. The learned counsel submitted that as per the provisions of Rule 82, any schedule or annexure to the election petition is also required to be signed by the election petitioner and verified by him in the same manner as the petition, but the documents produced by the election petitioner before the learned tribunal have not been verified in the manner prescribed, therefore, the same cannot be permitted to be exhibited. The learned election tribunal has arrived at the finding that the documents produced are the true copies obtained from District Election Officer, Bhilwara (Collector, Bhilwara) and on each and every document, the petitioner has incorporated the verification under his signature, therefore, there is no violation of the provisions of Rule 82 of the Rules 1994. As per the provisions of Rule 82 (2) of the Rules, 1994, any schedule or annexure to the petition shall also be signed by the petitioner and verified by him in the same manner as the petition. The learned tribunal has found that all the documents submitted alongwith the election petition fulfil the requirement of Rule 82 (2) of the Rules, 1994. It is not understandable that why the exhibit should not be permitted to be marked on such documents, if admissible in the evidence, produced in conformity with Rule 82 of the Rules, 1994. The learned counsel has not been able to show any error in the order passed by the learned tribunal. It appears that such application was preferred by the petitioner just to delay the trial of the election petition. I do not find any infirmity or illegality in the order passed by the learned tribunal, warranting interference by this Court in exercise of its extra ordinary jurisdiction. The writ petition is devoid of any merit, the same is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (SANGEET LODHA),J.