Crl. Misc No. M 10702 OF 2011 ****** Chetan Singh vs State of Haryana Present : Mr. J.S.Bedi, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG Haryana Mr. K.S.Nalwa, Advocate for the complainant. ******* The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.840, dated 10.9.2010, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 307, 506, 216, 325, 120-B of the IPC, and Section 25 of the Arms Act, at Police Station City Karnal, District Karnal. On 19.4.2011, the following contentions were noticed :- “ Learned counsel has argued that the injury attributed to the petitioner is not reflected in the medical record and that even the other injuries at best make out a case under Section 325 IPC. Further that the offence under Section 307 IPC has been added on the allegation that a shot was fired which missed.” Today, counsel for the respondent on instructions from Inspector Manoj Verma, has accepted the fact that the injury attributed to the petitioner is not reflected in the medical record. This has also been accepted by counsel for the complainant, though he has opposed the grant of bail on the ground that the petitioner would definitely be guilty under Sections 34/149 of the IPC because he was a part of unlawful assembly. That fact would, of-course, be appreciated by the trial Court after the evidence is led. In my considered opinion, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be necessary. He is, however, directed to appear Crl.Misc No. M 10702 of 2011 :2: before the Investigating Officer on 11.5.2011 between 10 am to 3 pm and on any other date which the Investigating Officer may so require him, and in the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Investigating Officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) April 28, 2011. JUDGE `kk'