IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9363 of 2008. Decided on: 16.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Rameshwar Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. R.P. Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.1. Mr. Varun Chandel, Advocate vice Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India for respondent No.2. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Mr. R.P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 16, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?