* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 11. + CRL.REV. No. 449 of 2008 OMKARI Petitioner Through: None. versus STATE Respondent Through: Mr. Pawan Bahl, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR ORDER % 08.05.2009 CRL.REV. No. 449 of 2008 & CRL.M.A. No. 9522 of 2008 1. None appears despite one pass over. The previous order dated 6"^ February 2009 directing the Petitioner to file the amended memo of parties has not been complied with. Process fee and sets have also not been filed for service of Respondent No.2. It appears that the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the petition. The petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. 2. The application is disposed of S.MURALIDHAR, J MAY 08,2009 dn x> • 7-'=tikI (ffl Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified