BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Seventh day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH CRL OP(MD) No.11938 of 2011 1. ALEX EDINBARO 2. MICHEAL SAHAYARAJ : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.3 & 4 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, THANJAVUR. IN CR.NO.24 OF 2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.ARUNPRASAD Advocate For Respondent : Mr. K.V.RAJARAJAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/A3 and A4 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 409, 406, 467, 465, 468, 477(A), 420 and 120(b) of I.P.C. in Crime No.24 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence seeks, anticipatory bail. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent State and also perused the entire materials available on record. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are the President and Vice President of the Panchayat. The first petitioner herein being A3 is working as clerk and the second petitioner/A4 is owner of a private company. In so far as A1 and A2 are concerned, this Court by its order dated in Crl.O.P.No.11071 of 2011 dated 29.08.2011 was pleased to enlarge them on anticipatory bail. Inasmuch as the petitioners/A3, a4 are https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ concerned, this Court is of the view that the same will have to be applied to them also. Even though the learned Additional Public Prosecutor made his objections regarding the quantum of amount involved which is said to be misappropriated, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in view of the fact that A1 and A2 were already granted anticipatory bail by this Court. 4. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thanjavur, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police for a period of four weeks and thereafter, as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 27/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.2, THANJAVUR. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR AT KUMBAKONAM 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, THANJAVUR. +1 CC to M/S. A.ARUNPRASAD Advocate SR.No.33800 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11938 of 2011 NSV/28.9.11/2P/6C Date :27/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/