IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA FRIDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2010 / 8TH SRAVANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 3830 of 2010() ----------------------------- (CRIME NO.322/2010 OF ERUMELY POLICE STATION) PETITIONER ------------------------------ K.E.A.AZEEZ AGED 56, S/O.IBRAHIM KULANJIPPARAMBIL HOUSE, MUNDAKKAYAM,KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.A.HASSAN SMT.JULIA PRIYA RESHMY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- S.I.OF POLICE, ERUMELY, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.HEMA, J ----------------------- B.A No.3830 OF 2010 -------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of July 2010 ORDER This petition is for anticipatory bail. 2. The alleged offences are under Sections 120B, 465, 468, 419, 420 and 34 of IPC. According to prosecution, petitioner (A1), along with others committed offence of forgery and impersonation etc. in respect of a sale deed purported to be executed in favour of petitioner in respect of a property. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the property stands in the name of petitioner, as per the assignment deed executed by de facto complainant in the year 2004. A building was also constructed therein, after obtaining sanction. Building tax was also paid by petitioner since 2004. All these facts are known to de facto complainant, but, a false complaint is filed stating that sale deed was executed by impersonating de facto complainant etc. 4. Petitioner requested for an opportunity to explain his innocence before the Investigating Officer. This court directed him to appear before the Investigating Officer. He appeared before the Investigating Officer and he was interrogated, it is submitted. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that petitioner reported before the Investigating Officer and he was interrogated. He has no objection in granting anticipatory bail to petitioner on condition. B.A No.3830 OF 2010 2 6. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that anticipatory bail can be granted on conditions. Hence, the following order is passed. (1) Petitioner shall, in the event of his arrest, be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting officer on the following conditions: (i) Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when directed and co-operate with investigation. (ii) Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate any witnesses or tamper with any evidence. (3) This order will be in force only for a period of 20 days from today. In the mean time, whether petitioner is arrested or not, he shall seek regular bail from the court concerned, in accordance with law. Petition is allowed. K.HEMA JUDGE B.A No.3830 OF 2010 3 vdv