:1: :1: :1: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4470 OF 2006. Sadhana Kamlakar Ambike. ..Petitioner. Versus. Dhananjay K. Ambike & others. ..Respondents. --- Mr. Ashok Tajane for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Shete for the respondent Nos. 1 & 3. CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE: JANUARY 18, 2007. DATE: JANUARY 18, 2007. DATE: JANUARY 18, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. 2. The impugned order warrants interference to a limited extent of increasing the maintenance from Rs.350/- to Rs.650/- per month, at this stage. Apparently, a part of the property is sold for a sum of Rs.1,30,000/-. The suit has also been expedited. In the circumstances, no further interference is warranted. 3. Rule is made absolute accordingly, i.e., the maintenance is increased from Rs.350/- p.m. to Rs.650/- :2: :2: :2: per month. The rest of the order shall remain as it is. It is clarified that the increased amount of maintenance shall be paid only from the date hereof. Upto date maintenance shall be paid at the rate of Rs.350/- per month. The arrears, if any, shall be paid within a period of four weeks from today. Needless to state that this order is passed without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties. 4. Petition is accordingly disposed of.