IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 4579 of 2009 Date of Decision: March 24, 2009 Rohit Kumar ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. R.K.Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Yash Deep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be satisfied if this writ petition is treated as a representation and respondent No.2 be directed to decide the same in view of the instructions (Annexure P-5) and judgments (Annexures P8 & P-9) by passing a speaking order within a stipulated period. Respondent No.2 i.e. the Director General of Police, Haryana,Sector 6, Panchkula is directed to treat this writ petition as a representation and pass a speaking order after taking all aspects of the case of the petitioner and instructions (Annexure P-5) & judgments (Annexures P-8 and P-9) into consideration within a period of one month from the date of receiving of a copy of this order. Petition is disposed off as such. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 24 sunita