Hlfi-H CQURT QF £HHATH$<§£§EH AT BELA5PUR fwMyNn‘gih‘w @f ZQQQ The Sfate. of Chhmfisgarh Thraugh - Disfr‘ic‘r Magis‘l’m‘re, Easmr‘ (C(71) Vgrsw Qgnfu; $/9.—Anantmm, Aged abw‘t - ?3 years Occupa‘i'ion — Kofwar, Laikhu €/b.-5udu, Aged abau‘r - 15 years 3. Lachhin Ram, S/a—Suw Qnm Aged abou’? - 22 years AH are R/Q-Mundagnnn, P.53hanpuri, Disfr-ic‘r — Eas’mr {APPLICA'EION FOR GRANT OF LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDEE SECTION 37.3 {3) AND MEMO C)? AFFEAL UNDER SECTIGN 3?8(1) OF Cr?.C.) Aggwem a nandtgms % m ,v§ a g‘. h,“ (5%; Hon’ble Mn 11?. $harma, 5L) Shri $.ushi! Dubay, fywemmgm Advagafe for fha agpaHam-J5'rm'a QRAL DRIER {9assad $5 2“ Jaw. 2$09} 7%‘3 is an n pHm‘rien far mndomfim nf delay in wing the gefifian as i*§'§e sama has baa?! prefer-rem? wifh a. dgkay of 141 rim/5 On dug cengidemfinn 0f The grounds mentiened in +1w appHcai’iam §t is ailowedu Deiay i?! filing fha peTiTion is hereby condcnzd. Heard The ap e!!an‘tl’5mi'e has filed ‘rhis §pecia3 Eeave TO appgai under Svc‘rbn 378(3) of irhg (Sada 9f Crimim! Pmcedum, 1973 agains? The n? Qf acqui‘rmi dams! 12.11.2008 paSwed bv The Addi‘tiem! Chiaf Judigmi Magg‘rm‘rgi Rn<+gri ha, Cvimina! Case No.357J20Q7 wharaby 'the a {Kr a Bl— _ g._ After- appreciafing the mamrial avaiiabla on record, the Caur‘r bgiaw has acquitted fhe respandents of the charge 9f Section 354/34 of the §§ Indian Penal Code on ‘Hae ground That the prosecution has failed to pmve the charge beyond shadnw of dnubt. Taking into considemtian the fectum 03F demand 0f centribution ' (£handa) and dispute, the View taken by the Caurt below is not errnneous and g unreasnnable warranting interference. I d0 nnt find any ground for grant ef l leave t0 appeali Cansequently, the petition is liable to be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed. i! g F2, Sdl. it “LESHARMA Judge V