IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 9556 of 2008 Between: N.Krishna Raju S/o.Ranga Raju R/o.S.S.Puram Village, Nagalapuram Mandal, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Revenue) Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collectorate, Rep. by its Collector, Chittoor District. 3 The REvenue Divisional Office, Rep. by its Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 4 The Tahsildar, Nagalpuram Mandal, Chittoor District. 5 N.Krishnama Raju S/o.Chengal Raju R/o.S.S. Puram Village, Nagalapuram Mandal, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent to dispose of the appeal dated 20.3.2008 against the orders vide D.Dis.G/1788/2007 dated 10.12.2007 and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to issue the pattedar pass book to the petitioner by including the petitioner's land and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.R.CHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 9556 of 2008 Order: The main grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that against the orders dated 10.12.2007 passed by the 3rd respondent, namely the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupathi, Chittoor District, he filed revision petition on 20.03.2008 before the 2nd respondent, namely the District Collector, Chittoor District, but no orders thereon have been passed till date. Hence, he filed the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1 to 4, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the revision filed by the petitioner. Since the revision filed by the petitioner is said to be pending consideration before the 2nd respondent, and in view of the agreed stand taken by both the counsel, without going into the merits of the matter, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: The 2nd respondent, namely the District collector, Chittoor District, is directed to consider and dispose of the revision filed by the petitioner on 20.03.2008, against the orders dated 10.12.2007 passed by the 3rd respondent, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 29.04.2008 Ksr/Nsr