1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application (cao) No. 996 of 2011 (In SA St 5730/11, Rej. SA 358/11) Mst. Sajedabegum W/o Sk. Saifulla ...Versus... Mst. Hamidabi wd/o Sk. Chhote & ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.M. Pande Advocate for applicant. … CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 20.08.2011. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, I am satisfied that there are good and sufficient reasons to condone the delay in filing application for restoration of second appeal. Hence, the application is allowed in terms of its prayer clause. C.A. disposed of. MCA St. No. 12184/11 Not on board. Taken on board. This is an application for restoration of S.A. No. 358/11 which was dismissed for non removal of office objections. Having gone through the application, I am satisfied that good grounds exist to restore the matter which was dismissed on 23.6.2011 for non removal of office objections. Hence, this application is allowed 2 in terms of its prayer clause. M.C.A. St.No. 12184/11 is disposed of. Office objections be removed on or before 17.9.2011. Judge /TA/