IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24007 of 2009 1. SAKALU YADAV 2. RAM AUTAR YADAV 3. BHUSHAN YADAV 4. MIRDI DEVI @ HIRDI DEVI @ HIRDI YADAV 5. NANKU YADAV 6. NAGESHWAR PRASAD @ NAGESHWAR YADAV 7. BABULAL PRASAD @ BABULAL YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a Police case under Sections 420, 307 and other provisions of the Penal Code. Alleging false implication, it is submitted that Section 307 has no application. Petitioner no.5 is the father of the informant. Petitioner no. 4 is the purchaser of the land. The informant has filed the case at the behest of her father-in-law with regard to the properties and Partition Suit No. 58 of 2008 is pending between the parties. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gaya in Atri P.S. case No. 116 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)