ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 614 OF 2000 APPEAL NO. 614 OF 2000 APPEAL NO. 614 OF 2000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms.S.P.Manchekar for the State. Mr.M.L.Patil for Respondent Nos.1 to 6. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 17th June, 2008 : 17th June, 2008 : 17th June, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . The appeal filed by the State Government against the impugned order enhancing the compensation restricting to Rs.15,000/- with other benefits, in accordance with law, has no substance. The lower Court after considering the merit of the matter specifically observed that the claimant in fact is entitled for the amount of Rs.1,51,269/- (Rupees one lac fifty one thousand two hundred sixty nine only) but as restricted the claim to 15,000/- ( 2 ) and passed the impugned order and granted all benefits available under the provisions of Land Acquisitions Act as thereby enhanced the amount comes to 24,180/- (Rupees twenty four thousand one hundred eighty only). 2. After considering the reasoning so given, there is no case is made out by the applicant, in the present facts and circumstances of the case, to interfere in the said order. The reasonings so given by the Courts below cannot be said to be perverse in accordance with law. The Appeal is, therefore, dismissed at this stage itself. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) V.MOHTA, J.) V.MOHTA, J.)