-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.W.P.NO.1975 OF 1999 M/s.Mrinal Texturising Ind.Ltd. and Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Innovation Garments Ltd. and Anr. ..Respondents .... Mr.S.V.Marwadi Adv. for Petitioners Respondent No.1 served Mr.A.S.Shitole A.P.P. for Respondent No.2 .... WITH CRI.W.P.NO.1978 OF 1999 M/s.Mrinal Texturising Ind.Ltd. and Ors. ...Petitioners Vs. M/s.Eicher Span Financial Services Ltd. and Anr. ...Respondents .... Mr.S.V.Marwadi Adv. for Petitioners Respondent No.1 served Mr.A.S.Shitole A.P.P. for Respondent No.2 .... WITH CRI.W.P.NO.1981 OF 1999 M/s.Mrinal Dyeing and Mfg.Co.Ltd. and Ors. ..Petitioners -2- Vs. M/s.Eicher Span Financial Services Ltd.and Anr. ..Respondents .... Mr.S.V.Marwadi Adv. for Petitioners Respondent No.1 served Mr.A.S.Shitole A.P.P. for Respondent No.2 .... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 31,2006 DATE : JULY 31,2006 DATE : JULY 31,2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Mr.S.V.Marwadi, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that the point in these petitions, is squarely covered by the decision in Pankaj Mehra Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in Pankaj Mehra Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in Pankaj Mehra Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in AIR SCW 2000 page 991 AIR SCW 2000 page 991 AIR SCW 2000 page 991. In view of the above statement, these petitions are disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]