IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1514 (SS) of 2011 Ram Chandra Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate present for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel present for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. 1. Heard Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. The petitioner is a “Cane Supervisor” in the Cane Department, State of Uttarakhand. Vide order dated 24.10.2011 passed by respondent no. 2, he has been suspended. 3. The department contemplated the inquiry against the petitioner. Apparently it is admitted that such an order can be passed during contemplation. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner’s appointing authority is Regional Deputy Cane Commissioner. All the same, suspension order has been passed by the Cane Commissioner. There is no anomaly in the said order, inasmuch as suspension order can also be passed by the superior authority. 5. The writ petition is misconceived and is liable to be dismissed and the same is hereby dismissed. 6. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) Dated: 16.11.2011 VKG