THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH C.R.P.Nos.6020 and 6056 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: The parties are one and the same in these civil revision petitions. Therefore, these two civil revision petitions are taken up together for disposal by way of common order. The petitioners herein are defendants 5 and 6 in the suit filed by respondents 1 and 2 herein in O.S.No.81of 2003 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet, for partition of the suit schedule property. In the said suit, the evidence on behalf of the plaintiffs as well as the defendants is completed. Thereafter, defendants 5 and 6 filed I.A.No.1521 of 2009 to permit them to take summons to the 7th defendant to examine him and I.A.No.1522 of 2009 is filed for the purpose of reopening the evidence of the petitioners-defendants 5 and 6, which was closed on 10-11-2009. The court below vide its orders, dated 23-11-2009, dismissed the said applications. Aggrieved thereby, the present civil revision petitions are filed. The petitioners in their applications stated that evidence on their behalf was closed on 10-11-2009 and they are having further evidence to adduce on their behalf. Therefore, the evidence is required to be reopened. It is further stated that they may also be permitted to take summons to the 7th defendant for the purpose of examining him. Absolutely, no reasons have been shown as to why the 7th defendant is required to be summoned and for that purpose. Even, in the application for reopening of the evidence, no specific plea has been taken for what purpose they would like to reopen the evidence. Therefore, I am of the opinion that the court below had rightly dismissed the said applications and as such, I do not find any infirmity legal or otherwise in the impugned order so as to call for interference by this Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 01-07-2011 Prv