IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 607 OF 2007 SHRI. RAVI HUNSHAL ... Petitioner Versus THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PANAJI THROUGH COMMISSIONER AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Ranjit Satardekar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Shivan Dessai, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. G. Shirodkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for Respondent No.2. Coram:- D. B. BHOSALE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 29th January, 2008 P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. By this Writ Petition, the petitioner has impugned the notices dated 28/10/2007 and dated 12/12/2007 issued by respondent no.1, informing the petitioner to shift to a space earmarked for him in the new Municipal Market in lieu of shop no. 2 which was alloted to him purely on temporary basis, until shifting is done in the new Municipal Market Complex. 3. Mr. Ranjit Satardekar, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to have a shop in the new Municipal Market Complex and not open space as indicated in the impugned notices. 4. We perused the notices so also the other material and more particularly, letter dated 17/06/2005, written by the petitioner to the Municipal Commissioner, which clearly indicate that he was occupying the open space bearing no. (C) 216 in the old Municipal Market and not a shop and, therefore, respondents have rightly alloted him an open space in the new Municipal Market Complex. 5. We find no substance in the Writ Petition. Writ Petition is dismissed. 6. The petitioner to shift to the open space alloted to him in the new Municipal Market Complex within a period of two weeks from today. D. B. BHOSALE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH