IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.31 of 2009 VINOD KUMAR SHARMA Versus SMT.RUCHI SINGH & ANR ----------- 2. 16.1.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner. It is quite strange that the court below by the impugned order without examining the Pleader Commissioner has taken his report and its enclosure on record by way of evidence. Such procedure is wholly unknown in law. The court below, therefore, must first examine the Pleader Commissioner and if in course of his deposition the report with its enclosure is taken on record by way of evidence and marked exhibit, the document in question marked as exhibit shall be treated to be evidence but in the event the Pleader Commissioner fails to prove his report and its enclosure in accordance with law, the same will not be taken on record. With the aforementioned observation, this application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/