IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.429 of 2009 SMT.PREM LATA DEVI Versus SMT.PREMA DEVI ----------- 4/ 18.05.2009 Heard counsel for the parties and perused the report at Flag – ‘P’ by which it is apparently clear that order dated 11.12.2008 has been passed indeed in the suit. There could not have been doubt when the very certified copy was obtained from the record of Title Suit no. 71 of 2005 and same was brought under challenge through the present revision petition. This is indeed sad that after disposal of the title suit above said and in spite of the decree being put in execution by filing Execution case no. 3 of 2007, the orders were passed in disposed of suit seeking the part execution of the decree which is being obstructed by filing objections in the court below by the petitioner and, thus objections are being scrutinized by the execution court that such orders are passed as if the learned Special Judge was unaware of the execution proceeding or was unaware of the position of law that the decree should be executed and the suit which has been disposed of could never be re-opened unless it was remanded by an appellate court after setting aside the judgment and decree. The orders passed in Title Suit no. 71 of 2005 passed by Sub Judge I, Munger on 11.12.2008 or prior to that date or subsequent to that date are simply orders passed without jurisdiction and have to be treated as nullity. Revision is allowed with the aforementioned observations. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)