:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3026 OF WRIT PETITION NO.3026 OF WRIT PETITION NO.3026 OF 2007 2007 2007 M/s. Technomax Engineering Products through its Partner Amol Shankar Kalburgi ..Petitioner. Vs. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner ..Respondent. Mr.R.P.Walvekar, adv. for the Petitioner. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : AUGUST 3, 2007. DATE : AUGUST 3, 2007. DATE : AUGUST 3, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Walvekar the learned counsel for the petitioner. None for the respondents. 2. The respondent, who is Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner passed an order dated 29-9-2004 directing the petitioner to deposit an amount of Rs.2,55,160/- on account of provident fund, family pension fund and insurance fund contribution and the administrative charges for the period from September, 2001 to August, 2004. The petitioner after receiving that order made an application dated 14th December, 2004 for review of that order contending that the petitioner had already submitted conciliation statements of the relevant provident funds and had also made all the payments. In support of this, the petitioner also submitted copies of the relevant documents. The grievance of the :2: petitioner is that review application dated 14th December, 2004 is not yet decided by the respondents. 3. In my opinion taking into consideration the grievance, the petition may be disposed off with the following directions. 4. The respondent shall hear the petitioner and passed the appropriate order on the review application dated 14th December, 2004 in the light of evidence placed by the petitioner before him. The review application may be disposed off within three months from this date. 5. Petition stands disposed off. [J.H.BHATIA, J.] [J.H.BHATIA, J.] [J.H.BHATIA, J.]