IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14045 of 2009 1. SITA DEVI, Wife of Shambhu Paswan, 2. Shambhu Paswan, son of Gunjan Paswan, Both resident of village – Bahadurpur, P.S. – Bahadurpur, District – Darbhanga. ----------- Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------------ Opposite Party. ****** For the petitioners : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Jha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Amrendra Prasad, APP ******* 02. 26.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of order dated 12.02.2009 passed in G.R. No. 694/2007 by learned court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 63/2007 dated 11.04.2007 taking cognizance for offences under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code. The case was instituted against three unknown relating to kidnapping of minor son of the informant. As pointed out initially, charge sheet was submitted against 15 persons, out of whom, three persons stands convicted and remaining 12 persons including son of the petitioners have been acquitted. During trial, supplementary charge sheet was submitted against the petitioners also, against whom cognizance has been taken, which is under challenge. 2 In face of the above facts and circumstances indicating that earlier cognizance for the offences has already been taken and the persons against whom charge sheet was submitted had faced the trial. I don’t find any reason to interfere at this stage, accordingly, prayer is dismissed with a liberty to agitate all his points before the trial court at the time of hearing on the point of charge. The trial court shall consider all the materials and pass appropriate order in accordance with law without being prejudiced of instant order of non-interference. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)