IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11650 of 2005 1. Anandi Kumar S/o Late Satyadeo Singh resident of village & P.O.-Belaon, P.s.-Kaler, District-Arawal. 2. Kamal Prasad S/o Late Ramdas Ram, resident of village Balesar Chauki, P.O.-Balesar, P.S.-Kaler, District- Arawal. 3. Azhar Ahamad @ Azharhamid S/o Hamid Khan resident of village & Post-Kaler, P.s.-Kaler, District-Arwal. 4. Rajkumari Devi W/o Sunil Kumar resident of village- Khaira, P.O. Usari, P.S.-Kaler, District-Arawal. 5. Jairam Sharma S/o Late Rambilas Sharma resident of village-Khajpura, P.O.-Jaipur, P.S.-Kaler, District-Arawal. 6. Mozaffar Khan Zafri S/o Late Wakil Khan resident of village & Post-Hrdiyachak P.S.-Kaler, District-Arawal 7. Kapildeo Prasad S/o late Tetar Prasad resident of village Upadhyay Bigha, P.O.-Mainpura, P.S.-Kaler, District- Arawal 8. Makabul Khan S/o Late Khalil Khan, the UP-Pramukh of Kaler Panchayat Samiti, resident of village Pura Kothi P.O.-Belaon, P.S.-Kaler, District-Arawal 9. BimliDevi @ Bimla Devi W/o Shivapukar singh resident of village Injuar, P.O.-Injura, P.S.-Kaler, District-Arawal Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, new Secretariat, Baily Road, Patna-8000001 2. The District Magistrate, Arawal 3. The Sub Divisional Magistrate kaler, Arawal 4. The Block Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer Kaler, Arawal 5. Sri Dhananjay Thakur, S/o name not known the then Block Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Kaler, P.S.-Kaler, District-Arawal 6. Sri Alok Kumar the present Block Development Officer- cum-Executive Officer-Kaler, P.S.-Kaler, Dist.-Arawal. 7. Sanjay Sharma S/o Late Srinandan Sharma resident of village-Kamta, P.S.-Parasi, District-Arawal. ---------------------------------- 2. 11.11.2011 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner when the case is called out. Learned counsel for the State is present and submits that the writ petition has become infructuous as it relates to holding of office of the then Pramukh in the year 2005 and due to efflux of time and 2 also the fact that fresh election has been held in the year 2011, nothing remains to be adjudicated. This Court finds substance in the submissions of learned counsel for the State. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed off. Anand Kr. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)