1 ndm 21 wp.2295.06 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2295 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders None appears for the parties. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 10th December, 2010. P.C. 1 The Petitioner appearing in person is not present. The order dated 4th April, 2006 reads thus: “1. Petitioner who is present in person requests to produce the matter for withdrawal by filing the preciape and, therefore, the production was allowed at 3 p.m. The main petition has been filed by the petitioner in person. The petitioner who is present in person states that he desires to withdraw the petition with liberty. When it was made clear to him that he will have to pursuade this Court in order to get liberty to filel a fresh petition, the petitioner submits that he does not press the preciape for withdrawal and instead claims that the petitioner be allowed to amend the petition. Since the petitioner is in person the petitioner is directed to file a civil application stating the proposed amendment to the petition which will be considered on merit as to whether the said amendment is to be allowed or not.” 2 The Petitioner appearing in person has not filed application for amendment. The Petitioner appearing in 2 person is not present. The office remarks shows that on 13th July, 2007, the Petitioner appearing in person has written a letter that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. [ A.S.OKA, J ]