IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 10754 of 2005 Between: 1 Polipaka Anand, S/o. Yellaiah, R/o. H.No. 10-1-317, Girimajipet, Warangal District. 2 Vodapally Surangapani, S/o. Sambaiah, R/o. H.No. 10-1-217, Girimajipet, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 District Collector of Warangal, at Warangal. 2 The Commissioner of Muncipal Corporation, of Warangal, At Warangal. 3 Iytha Bhasker, S/o. Narasaiah, R/o. H.No. 11-6-107, Christian Colony, Warangal. 4 Iytha Prakash, S/o. Narasaiah, R/o. H.No. 11-6-108, Christian Colony, Warangal. 5 Iytha Prabhakar, S/o. Narasaiah, R/o. H.No. 11-6-108, Christian Colony, Warangal. 6 Iytha Mariyamma, W/o. Iytha Bhasker, R/o. H.No. 11-6-107, Christian Colony, Warangal. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus in action of the Respondents 1 & 2 against the Respondents 3 to 6 in respect of the land denoting survey No. 99, extent of 18 guntas and Survey No.1 extent of 1.20 Acres of Village Girimajipet, mandal Warangal, District Warangal, situated in the 35th Division, Municipal Corporation of Warangal is illegal arbitrary to law, against the principles of natural justice and violation under Article 14 to 21 of the Constitution of India and grant such other relief or reliefs as the Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper as per the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.T.GHORI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No : 10754 of 2005 O R D E R : It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the first petitioner has died and therefore, no further adjudication is necessary on merits at this stage. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J Dated: 23-01-2009 KLP