- 1 - D.B.HABEAS CORPUS PETITION NO.4407/2007 NARAYAN RAM VS. STATE & ORS. DATE OF ORDER : 8/10/2007 HON'BLE SHRI RAJESH BALIA, J. HON'BLE SHRI SANGEET LODHA, J. Mr.Sandeep Mehta, for the petitioner. Mr.J.Gehlot, for the respondent no.5 Mr.L.R.Upadhaya, for the State. The Corpus Smt. Purna has been produced today in the Court, therefore, the matter was taken up for hearing. The petitioner's case is that corpus Purna is his lawfully wedded wife and has been enticed away by respondent no. 4 son of Shri Bagga Ram, who is stated to be related as nephew of Ms.Purna. Respondent no.5 is represented by Shri Gehlot. Smt. Purna has stated that she was married to Narayan Ram against her wishes but she has married Virendra, which only reflects that she is living with Virendra by volition and she is not under illegal detention. There is no dispute about she being of age. - 2 - In these circumstances, to us, it appears to be not a case of illegal detention but matrimonial grievance, which can be pursued by the aggrieved party before appropriate forum. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed & Smt. Purna is set free to go wherever she wants to. (SANGEET LODHA), J. (RAJESH BALIA), J. pankaj baweja