1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.5447 of 2010. Sanjay Laxmanrao Gawande and ors. ..vs.. The Mah.State Electricity Distribution Co. and ors. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.R.L.Khapre, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr.K.H.Deshpande, Sr.Adv for R.1 to 3. Mr.A.Joshi, AGP for respondent no.4. C ORAM : V. C. DAGA AND A.B.CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED : 30th November, 2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondents. The petitioners through this petition are seeking a writ of mandamus against the respondents calling upon them to give fuel adjustment charges since the Government is agreed to bear the charges for the period from May, 2000 to March, 2010 including July 2004 to May, 2005. Learned Senior counsel submits that earlier bills, which were issued, are including the fuel charges for the period from May, 2000 to March, 2010. By way of example; it is brought to our notice that earlier bill was for Rs.44,820=00 whereas the revised bill, which has been issued, is for Rs.24,450=00. In view of this, we are satisfied that the policy of the State is being implemented 2 by the respondents. We make it clear that if any individual person has any individual grievance with respect to the calculations or figures or electricity charges demanded, it would be open for them to raise the appropriate dispute before the Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum. With these observations, petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE. pzc