f>ayL' I1-. TH£ HIGH GOURT OF JUDICJ^TURE AT BIIASPUR (Cffil&TTISGARH) 16..p. No. __CL£L^__/2001 PETmoNER s Jaiuil Khan s/o Umar Kban, aged about .. 38 years, resident o£ Dhararaja.i.garll, ^\..-^^' Distt. Raigarh(C.G.) ^^•^.-' .•-•"'c^^;.''"' Y££S ^ S ^;',^^.0.'-" .^ „•:_ ^ ,,.~-.'~J'.~ ~ ~ ^r_ ^it!^^ .-•••'' :.' '<1&;-''%L:\.^'^" fc .^-^^^r:!^^ ^-^^--. ^"lA^[o^-A''i.----^:-L-;V':?% ll^ ^' RESPONDENTS'"?'^ ; -?l^a~QliefMAnlci.pal Officer . Nagar v-°''~' • "•" Panchayat, Eharamjaigarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (2) Director, Sthaniya Shasan AVcim Nagar Prashasan ( Nagar Panchavat ) , State o£ Chhattisgarh, Ra-tpur (C.G.) '3) President, 1'Iagar Pancfaayat, Dharam- Jaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.S. ^S^T-SS^I'£52^-^2££-^R?3S&§-SS§Z^^2-.2S-.'£SE-£2?-T§SSI^2^°2 INDIA FOR ISSUAMCE OF &PPROPRIATE WRIT ^ np nHUATTlS 'v'ff'y ^^s~ss~s^i 3 a«'i;»i'iii t- IfltiA i^BZsi^one s/ersu' ^as&nnn^^^Ts 5001 Jamil Khan State of Chhattisaarh & Others ?::IK£isa|i WRIT PETiTiON UNDER ARTiCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF IND'A (SB: IVIr. K. J.S srst:- Shr A.N.Bhakta, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shr Shr s'hashank Thakur. Panel Lawver forthe State. .okesh Sincih, Advocate on behaif of Shri Rgnbir Sinsh Marhas, AdyQcats for the respondent No.1 (A) and 3. Jf/a^?°sa A 3 ''ai/S-ia»i'6—S ^. t txf .1 »fS;i (Passed on 7th day of October, 2010) Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press the matter on merits at this stage. However, the Detltioner may be permitted to make a representation to the Chief Municipai Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Dharamjaigarh, District Ralgarh, for considering the case of the petifioner svmDatheticaliv. Learned counse! appearing for the respondents No.1(A) and 3 submits that if a representation made by the petitioner, tha same shaii be considered svmDatheticaily, In accordance with law, witliin a period of four waeks from the date of making of representation. Learned counse! further submits that bye-iaws for reguiating iettlng out the accommodation, was not In existence at ihat time. !-' view ofthe above, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordingiy, the writ petition is djsposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agaihotri Judge