IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2009 / 24TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 19818 of 2009(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- MUKRINAKATH HAMSA HAJI SABIRA MANZIL,PUZHAKKARA, AYYAPPANKAVU, VILAKODE POST,KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS.MR.M.SASINDRAN MR.V.VENUGOPAL RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, MUZHAKKUNNU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MUZHAKKUNNU PO 670 673, KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. THE MUZHAKKUNNU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MUZHAKKUNNU ,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. EERADATHU MAYIN, EERADATHU HOUSE VILAKKODE PO, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. 4. ANVAR M.P S/O. YUSUF, VAZHAYIL HOUSE, KANNAVAM PO THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO. 19818 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 15th DAY OF JULY, 2009 JUDGMENT Notice to respondents dispensed with, preserving their right to move for rehearing, if aggrieved by the judgment being issued herein. 2. The petitioner has made Ext.P2 complaint about the blocking of a channel. Whatever be the merits or demerits of that complaint, first respondent has to issue an order thereon after hearing the necessary parties. Let this be done within an outer limit of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If the situation calls for any interlocutory orders, first respondent may consider issuing that also. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/15/7