IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 3273 of 2008 Between: E. Centric Solutions (Pvt.) Limited, Plot No.201, Rockdale compound, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Director Rudda Raju Venakata Vara Prasad Raju, S/o. Viswanandha Raju, aged 50 years R/o. Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Sub-Registrar, Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam district. 2 District Registrar, Visakhapatnam district, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents in withholding the document presented by the Petitioner for registration on 22.1.2007 pertaining to the land in Sy.No.13/A to an extent of ac.30.40 cents situated at Mucherla village, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam district is contrary to law and provisions of Registration Act and consequently direct the respondents to registrar the document presented for registration on 22.1.2007 and release the document in favour of the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.N.SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 3273 of 2008 O R D E R: While admitting the writ petition, an interim order was passed by this Court on 18.3.2008 directing the 1st respondent to process the document presented by the petitioner in accordance with the provisions of the Stamp Act and Registration Act and that in case the document cannot be registered, to pass appropriate orders indicating the reasons for the same and communicate to the petitioner within a period of two weeks. The respondents have filed counter affidavit and as per the said counter, the document presented by the petitioner was registered vide document No.20 of 2007 with an endorsement to the effect that the same shall be subject to result of the writ petition, but the document was kept pending and not released seeking certain clarification from the Tahsildar, Anandapuram. However, even at the time of filing counter, no clarification, as sought for, was received by the Registrar from the Tahsildar, Anandapuram. Under those circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to release the document and delete the endorsement that the registration made is subject to pendency of the present writ petition. No order as to costs. JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU. Date: 24-8-2009. MVB.