IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.635 of 2009 NARENDRA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4. 13.05.2009 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and the learned Counsel for Opposite party no. 2. The opposite party no. 2 was granted anticipatory bail in a police case under Sections 307 and other provisions of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act in Cr. Misc. No. 48536 of 2008 on 15.12.2008.Seeking cancellation of the same the submission on behalf of the informant- petitioner is that a wrong statement had been made in Para 10 of the application for anticipatory bail that the petitioner had no antecedent. He is stated to have antecedent of three cases details whereof are mentioned in Para 9 of the application for cancellation of bail. In reply to the same opposite party no. 2 does not deny this fact but only seek to explain he same. This court is satisfied from that singular reason alone of misrepresentation by opposite party no. 2 in his application for anticipatory bail, that the order granting him anticipatory bail dated 15.12.2004 is fit to be recalled. The anticipatory bail of opposite party no. 2 is cancelled. He is directed to surrender forth with. Any application for regular bail on his behalf shall be considered by the court below on its own merit including grant of regular bail to other co-accused without being prejudiced by the present order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)