CRM-M-35888 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-35888 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision:12.12.2011 Gurdit Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Vikram Anand, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. A.S.Rai, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Naveen Kaushal, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) On 1.12.2011, the following order was passed by this Court:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners, inter-alia, contends that he has the instructions from his client that they would make the payment of the Bank with which the property in dispute is already mortgaged and the bank is proceeding against the complainant/purchaser of the said property. He submits that the total amount due is Rs.6,86,000/- which shall be paid in installment to the bank. On his oral request, State Bank of India, Branch, Income Tax CRM-M-35888 of 2011 2 Office, Ludhiana Road, Moga through its Manager is impleaded as respondent No.2. Notice of motion to the Advocate General, Punjab including newly added respondent No.2 for 12.12.2011. In the meantime, arrest of the petitioners shall remain stayed subject to their making payment by depositing Rs.2 lacs with the Bank within a week from today. It is made clear that if the condition is not fulfilled then this petition shall be deemed to be dismissed.” Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners could not deposit Rs.2 lacs as directed and deposited only Rs.20,000/-. Since the petitioners did not deposit the amount of Rs.2 lacs as stipulated in the aforesaid order, the petition is dismissed. December 12, 2011. ( Rakesh Kumar Jain ) sk