- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.414 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.414 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.414 OF 2008 ALONG ALONG ALONG WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO.499 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.499 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.499 OF 2008 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.K.H.Holambe Pail for the applicant Ms M.H.Mhatre A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 20,2009 : APRIL 20,2009 : APRIL 20,2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The order impugned in this revision application is an order of acquittal of the first respondent passed on a private complaint by the applicant alleging commission of offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,1881. As remedy under sub section 4 of section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 is available, the revision application and consequently application for condonation of delay are not entertained. Same are dismissed by keeping the statutory remedy open. - 2 - JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE