THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO :13021 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed this writ petition for issuance of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the second respondent in issuing proceedings No.E1/498(1)/10-MPL-I, dated 02.06.2010, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner was appointed as a driver in the respondent corporation. Disciplinary proceedings have been initiated against him on the ground that he was involved in Crime No.21 of 2010 of Madanapalle II Town Police Station, for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC in connection with murder of Sri P. Anand, Assistant Depot Manager Traffic, Madanapalle Depot. On initiation of proceedings, the petitioner was placed under suspension and after completion of enquiry, the impugned notice dated 02.06.2010 has been issued to him calling upon him to submit objections/remarks before passing further orders in disciplinary proceedings. In this writ petition, it is submitted by Sri G. Ravi Mohan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner was not furnished with the copy of charge sheet and he was not given any opportunity in the enquiry proceedings. In spite of the same, the enquiry has been concluded and the report has been submitted by the enquiry officer, which is illegal and arbitrary. The impugned proceedings are only a notice inviting objections/remarks from the petitioner pursuant to the findings recorded by the enquiry officer. If there is any illegality in the findings recorded by the enquiry officer it is for the petitioner to put forth his objections by way of remarks before the respondent- Corporation. But at this stage the petitioner cannot rush to this Court seeking interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In that view of the matter, keeping it open to the petitioner to put forth his objections pursuant to the impugned proceedings dated 2.06.2010, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, it is open for the respondent to look into the objections/remarks, if any, filed by the petitioner, before finalizing the disciplinary proceedings. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ (R.SUBHASH REDDY, J.) 10th June, 2010 Js.