IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5166 of 2005 RANA PRATAP THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 22.01.2010 No one appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State is present. The petitioner had filed the writ petition for payment of the admissible amount of G.P.F. together with statutory interest. A counter affidavit was filed on behalf of the Block Development Officer, Dulhin Bazar and in paragraph 6 thereof it has been stated that the entire amount of provident fund together with interest has been paid to the petitioner. Another counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the District Provident Fund Officer, Patna and who in paragraph 8 has reiterated the said position. However, since no body appears to press this writ petition, the same is dismissed for non prosecution. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J. )