C^-l^. IN THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, CHHATTISTGARH at BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION (S) NO.'t^M'/ 2006. PETITIONER ...••"'A-^\tfe>-'' p-",^'rt>>-" ya' ^y^ *^-""' ^' RESPONDENTS ^^'"""^ 't . iC^ ®3N^!1 •^ 1 'sate.^—.ss^'' Rahul Kumar Bagde S/o Late Shri. J.T.Bagde Aged around 36 years, Unemployee. Residine at: Qr. No.l69-A, Ruabandha Sector, BHILAI-490001 Tehsil aadDist.: Durg (CG). VERSUS yi. The Managing Director (SAIL), Bhilai Steel Plant, Ispat Bhawan, BHDLAI - 490001 District: Durg (CG). The Sr. Manager (Persoimel), (Recmitment Section) Bhilai Steel Plant, BHILAI-490001 District: Durg fCG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF_ THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY. MANDAMUS ETC. XI-HC-78 sn^T^iTf^iN; <raT3IR?Tsb11°h -"I is'omo- *ll*l?ll sh*ltch s'er^nq^pr, aTfl<i'is, Riiii+fy .A^sa^^i^,,^ ^^ 311^1 4^* ((^?3^ST) STBTigT (rf?(T ail^T 30-8^2006 Heard Mr. B.P. Rao, eounsef By the instant writ petition it the petitioner has prayed that the i|s the petitioner for compassionate a( petitioner's father on medical grcuni|l The case of the petitioner is | Electrician in MalntenanceSectlonl medical ground the father of the p^ for the job by the Medteal Board of g father was dischaiged from service| the father of the petitioner pa^ submitted a representation for 6-7 years, the respondents have compassionate appointment. Learned counsel for the peti| of persons have been appointed on of the petitioner is not being considf consider the representation of the| matter. Having heard learned petition and the documents, the pr^ reasonable. Therefore, respondent submitted by the petitioner for comf the application considerirg the appointment, in aceordance with With the direction aforesaid, Parties are entitled for certifie ^iiqfa^T iTTOcrr ^ te:& Aw.K .^STf^ITSn^T for the petitioner. ider Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, sspondents be directed to eonsider the oase of )pointment on aceount of the retirement of the fhat the father of the petltioner was employed as IRMP-I of Bhllai Steel Plant. Subsequently, on ?titioner was cteolared Permanent Medioal Unflt ihilai Steet Plant. Based on that, the petitioner's vide order dated 21-11-1997. Unfortunately, ^sed away on 21-12-2000. The petitioner comtfassionate appointment. Even after the lapse of [not considered the case of the petitioner for ftoner submitted that on simjlar ground number sompassionate appointment,whereas, the case ^red. Therefore, the respondents be direoted to petitioner and pass appropriate order in the coun^el for the petitioner and having perused the |yer made by leamed counsel is just, fair and fMo.2 is directed to scrutinize ttie representation ^assionate appoirtment and pass final order on |oase of the petitbner for compassionate the t)olicy of respondent No. 1 . t[ie petition stands disposed oL ip copy of this order. §(j/.