IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.16071 of 2010 FAUDARI YADAV @ FAUZDARI YADAV Son of late Karu Yadav Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 01.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner, his father and others are alleged to have killed Lalit Yadav and Kailash Yadav. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that altogether 8-10 persons are said to have opened fire. He further submits that thus it cannot be said that only petitioner and his father are the assailants. The petitioner is in custody since 05.04.2006. He further submits that two witnesses examined in this case have turned hostile. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, if the trial does not conclude within four months from today, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. Let this order be communicated to the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. V, Jehanabad in S. Tr. No. 120 of 2006 (Ghosi P.S. case no. 260 of 2004) by the office. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)