IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3122 of 2008 ***** Ramparbesh Prasad son of Late Kameshwar Prasad, Resident of Mohalla Bahuar Chaura Near Tilha Dharamshala East Road, P.S. Civil Lines, P.O. and District-Gaya. …. …. Petitioner-petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through its Secretary Urbaon Development Department Bihar Patna namely S. Jalza. 2. The Municipal Commissioner, Gaya Municipal Corporation, Gaya, namely Rai Madan Kishore. …. …. Respondents-opposite parties ----------- 2. 11.11.2009. From the show-cause it is apparent that time frame fixed by this Court for payment of the dues of the petitioner has not been adhered to. If the opposite parties had genuine difficulty due to paucity of funds and financial constraints, the proper thing to do would have been to ask for extension of time but unilaterally sleeping over the matter will not be ignored in future. The payments have been made. The petitioner claims interest. As the resources are not there for the opposite parties to meet the basic payments, the Court does not want to burden the organisation by ordering payment of interest on the delayed payments. Petitioner will have to reconcile to the payment. The contempt application stands dismissed. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)