IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL WRIT No. 1561 of 2006 SAROJ V/S CIVIL JUDGE (J.D.),OSIAN & ORS. Mr. PD BOHRA for Mr. VIKRAM PUROHIT, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 13.7.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The impugned order is as old as 4.3.2006, and though the writ was filed at that time itself, but then adjournments after adjournments were sought till practically end of 2006. Ought we know that in these circumstances, after passing of the impugned order, the evidence may have been recorded as directed. In that view of the matter, I would not like to interfere in the impugned order in my writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed summarily. It is, however, made clear that it will be open to the petitioner to assail the correctness, legality, or propriety of the impugned order by setting forth appropriate ground in appeal, if necessity so arises, and if the petitioner so stands advised. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/