THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.9296 OF 2009 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.8813 OF 2009 Dated:16.11.2009 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.9296 OF 2009 Between: Jalli Raju .. Petitioner/2nd respondent And Kovvuri Veera Raghava Reddy @ Tata Reddy and others .. Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.9296 OF 2009 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.8813 OF 2009 ORDER: The main Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioners - accused Nos.1 to 4 respectively, seeking to quash the proceedings against them in Crime No.72 of 2009 of Biccavole Police Station, East Godavari District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and 323 and 506 read with 34 IPC. 2. On 28.10.2009, this Court disposed of the main Criminal Petition directing that the accused Nos.1 to 4 shall not be arrested till filing of the charge sheet, if any, and the investigation and consequential steps on the basis of the investigation shall go on and in case charge sheet is filed, the accused are at liberty to challenge the same. 3. Now, Criminal M.P. No.9296 of 2009 is filed by the de facto complainant, respondent No.2 in the Criminal Petition to recall the aforesaid order dated 28.10.2009 passed in the main Criminal Petition. 4. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the de facto complainant that the accused have earlier filed Criminal Petition No.8205 of 2009 for the very same relief prayed for in this Criminal Petition and the same was dismissed as withdrawn on 15.10.2009 and they have also filed W.P.No.21708 of 2009 for the very same relief and suppressing all these facts, the present Criminal Petition is filed. 5. Learned counsel for accused Nos.1 to 4 reports that he is not aware of the earlier proceedings and that he is not their counsel in those proceedings. 6. Apparently, accused Nos.1 to 4 have not only misled their counsel but have misled the Court also. 7. In the circumstances, the Criminal M.P.No.9296 of 2009 is allowed and the order, dated 28.10.2009 passed in the main petition is recalled and consequently the main Criminal Petition i.e., Criminal Petition No.8813 of 2009 shall stand dismissed. ___________________ P. SWAROOP REEDY, J 16th November 2009. KH