IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.557 of 2009 MD.TANWEER @ TANWEER ALAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioner : Mr. Kripa Nath Yadav, Advocate Mr. Arvind Saroj, Advocate For the informant : Madhusudan Kumar, Advocate For the state : Nand Kishore Pradad, APP ----------- 3 18.04.2009 The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted under sections 302/34 of Indian Penal Code. On 17.2.2009, a statement was made before this Court that no independent witness has supported the accusation so far as the petitioner is concerned. In that view of the matter, case diary was called for. Counsel for the informant as well as counsel for the state points out different paragraphs of the case diary including paragraph nos. 13, 14, 15, 17 and 18 in order to show that all the witnesses have supported the allegation in course of investigation. In that view of the matter, this Court finds no justification for grant of anticipatory bail It is, accordingly, rejected. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )