IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3897 of 2011 Sonelal Mahto @ Sone Lal Sah Versus Sheo Shankar Mahto & Ors ----------- 03. 15.11.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that because on the date when the M.J.C. No.2968 of 2011 was listed, his father was operated so he could not appeared before the Court when the M.J.C. application was called for. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this M.J.C. application is allowed and the order dismissing the M.J.C. application no.2968 of 2011 is set aside and the said M.J.C. application is restored to its original file. This M.J.C. application stands allowed. Saurabh ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)