IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT No. 2058 of 1990 M/s.M.R. Maheshwari .. Plaintiff versus Himmatlal J. Ajmera &Ors. .. Defendants ... Mr.P.N. Ganwani i/b S.N. Shah for the plaintiff. None present for the defendants. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 23rd June 2006. DATED : 23rd June 2006. DATED : 23rd June 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff. None present for the defendants. Counsel for the plaintiff points out that the defendants have not filed written statement and prays for a decree under Order 8 Rule 10 of the CPC. 2. Suit is a simple money suit. The defendants have not filed written statement. Therefore, averments made in the plaint are deemed to be admitted. Suit of the plaintiff is decreed under Order 8 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure in terms of the prayer clause. (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) .. Plaintiff versus .. Defendants ... Mr. Mr. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 23rd June 2006. DATED : 23rd June 2006. DATED : 23rd June 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff. None present for the defendant. Counsel for the plaintiff points out that the defendans have not filed written statement and prays for a decree under Order 8 RUle 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. Suit is a simple money suit. The defendants have not filed written statement. Therefore the averments made inthe plaint are deemed to be accepted. Suit of the plaintiff is decreed under Order 8 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure in terms of the prayer clause. (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J)