1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRI. APPLICATION NO. 157 OF 2008 Vijay Shyamdeo Titarmare and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and other ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders Mr. A.S. Mardikar, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. D.B. Yengal, A.P.P. for the State/respondent No.1. Mr. R.B. Gaikwad, Advocate for the respondent No.2. CORAM:- R. Y. GANOO, J. DATED :- 18th AUGUST, 2009. 1. By this petition, petitioners wanted that F.I.R. dated 21st October, 2007 should be quashed. The petitioners also wanted that charge sheet filed in the aforesaid case arising out of the said F.I.R. should be quashed. The rule was already issued and today I have heard learned Advocates on both sides. In the midst of argument the learned Advocate Mr. Mardikar applied for withdrawal of this petition upon instructions from his clients with liberty to file discharge application before the concerned Court. 2. The request is fair. Hence, the following order is passed. i) Petition is allowed to be withdrawn. ii) The petitioners are granted liberty to file a regular discharge application before the proper 2 Court. Since the F.I.R. pertains to the year 2007, if discharge application is filed, the same shall be disposed of within a period of three months from the date of filing of the same. iii) Petition is disposed of accordingly. iv) No views are express by this Court on merits. JUDGE pma.