1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CAO NO. 588 OF 2009 IN MCA (Rest)ST. NO. 9289 OF 2009 IN LPA NO. 159 OF 2009 IN WP NO. 2620 OF 2007 (Pandurang Govindrao Wankhede vs. Hon’ble 4 th Labour Court, Nagpur & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & F.M. REIS, JJ. AUGUST 17, 2009. Heard Ms. Khan, learned counsel for the applicant, Mrs. Joshi, learned AGP for respondent No.1 and Shri Parchure, learned counsel for respondent No.2. In Civil Application, prayer is to condone delay of 54 days in filing MCA St. No.9289 of 2009. That MCA is for recalling the order dated 6th March 2009 whereby LPA No. 159 of 2009 was dismissed for want of prosecution. Ms. Khan, learned counsel states that the applicant was appearing in person in LPA and thereafter she came to be appointed through legal aid. On 6th March 2009, the name of the learned counsel was not mentioned on daily board and therefore, she could not take notice of the matter. Hence, ultimately, the matter went in default. The application is supported by the affidavit of the learned counsel. In the circumstances, though Mrs. Joshi, 2 learned AGP for respondent No.1 and Shri Parchure, learned counsel for respondent No.2 are opposing the prayer for condonation of delay, we condone the delay. The office to register MCA. In view of the orders passed in Civil Application No. 588 of 2009 above, the prayers made in MCA St. No. 9289 of 2009 are also allowed and LPA No. 159 of 2009 is restored back to file. The objections, if any, should be removed by 14th September 2009. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.