1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.S.NO.607 OF 2001 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.115 of 1998 Mohandas Radhumal Gwalani ..vs.. Rajaram Tuksaram Gupte =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.N.R.Saboo Adv. for the appellant. Mr.B.S.Deshpande Adv. for the resp. C ORAM : C.L.Pangarkar, J. DATED : 30th March, 2010. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and applicant - Tulshiram Gupte. Applicant Tulshiram has filed this application for substituting him or adding him as party- respondent after the death of the original respondent Rajaram. The applicant Tulshiram claims that Rajaram had executed a Will in his favour and has bequeathed the rights of tenancy in his favour. The legal representatives of Rajaram in their reply to the application for substitution of the legal representatives have also made a reference to 2 the said Will said to be executed by Rajaram. In view of this, I find that the application of the present applicant should be allowed. The present applicant be added as party-respondent in this appeal. The question as to whether a tenancy rights under a Will can be bequeathed or not shall be decided when the appeal is heard finally. Legal representatives of Rajaram have also stated in their reply that they have no interest in the suit shop. The amendment be carried out within a week's time. S.O.6/4/2010. JUDGE. chute