"^qfcrilGH COURf'^FillHATl'^^^ (CHHATTISGARH) Contempt Case (Cal No. t O 4 /2011. -^ (Arising out of order dated 18.11.10 passed in writ petition (CR) No. 60/2009 by Hon'ble High Court.) PETITIQNER: ^ v fA Latel Das Banjare, son of Late Shri Bhukhal Banjare, aged about 52 years, resident of village Hathnikala, Post ^ oul^A^<' ,. --—----—- --—--^^3^----^^ ^V ^ Dharampura, Police Station Mungeli, y ^ Near Veterinary Hospital, Bilaspur, .^' ^^^ ..< ^t-t •* . . • t ~ ^'%^' .-•^ ^" ^•••>s<'^ .^' ^r,. (Contemnors) Chhattisgarh. Versus 1, Shri N.K.Oswal, Secretary, Home Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Shri Vishwaranjan Sinha, Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. CONTEMFT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OP COURTSACT. XI-HC-22 ^T^T^T ^Jch 3^1 5h^iGn ^rfi^ 4- T -^^ ^ll^ld'q, ^Tl1yJI^» ^<y1l^li< 3TTif?T '^3R .^o^.:..^?^-10..\bL\l / ^ "^ "200 @ HW^l ^*1(Gb •fN^ST' 3Tf^T^CTW^f^T SB : Hon'ble Shri Maniadra %ohaa Shrivastava, J 29.3.2011 Shri C.J.K. Rao, counsel Heard on admission. fflbd This petition has been disobedience of order dated CourtinW.P. (Cr.) No.60/200^ l^th para^raph- The averinents ma.de ia quite cryptic and vague, The| sought any information from tlf the compliance of the order cjj Court as contained in November, 2010 was to get death of Raniesh Das, invesfii agency^ may be the Crime proper steps to mitlate prosejc accordance with the provisiou^ withui a period of four week^ issue notice in tliis contempt p| <=hl^Td^lr1 'HTR^ff ^ f^T^t iF'l'^K ^^ri^m^TT^T br tlie petitioner. by the petitioner alleging willful November, 2010 passed by this p|aragraphs 4 & 5 in fhe petition are petitioner does not say that he |ie concerued ofiicers with regard to df the Court. The direction of this a^raph-7 of the order dated 18th entire incident witli regard to sfigated by a special investigating [4vestigation Department and take jcution^ if any^ of the culprits in of law, at the earliest, preferably \. Therefore, I am not inclined to Aition^ tjhe Irtvestis ['^••^^ T 1 XI-HC-22 ^-0=1 T^ll^l<n<4 ?PT,'^cft'OT^. t^rrary 3^^ '^SK ^IN^tl ^^j^——••*•*•—••——•—^p^ ^^ "I^^T" ^Tr^T^T f<r<i<=h ^n^i ^"RW^^fi^ Praveen 'sTT^T'^n^R'Hf^r -£ The petitioner would be a- specific details and making sp< directed by this Court, have bedn With fhe aforesaid obs^ disposed of. cbl^(<rl<flrl 'HTR^ff'? 1^^ ^^K iTsrf^FT^n^r Uberty to tlle fresh petition giving cific averments that no steps, as tnitiated. |rvations, fhe petition is finally Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge