IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.€ 'g y“ / 2003 Appellant 1) Asraf Alli S/o Samsuddin Musalman Aged about 32 years R/O -Dillirajhara P.S-Durga Dist: Durga (C.G.)» 2. RamdeV S/pMakhanlal Tramaskar Aged about 34 years R/o Dhamda P.S. Dhamda Dist- Durga CG ' Respondent :State of Chhattisgarh MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL U/S 374 ‘(2) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. WW.W.W mam m wauwmugw / 0 K m ‘81 200 W mu WW mTW asafmm JTINKER DIWAKER and a! are present in person and they a counsei. SB: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PF 24-02—201 1: Mr. H.S.Ahiuwalia, owns ;ei for the appeilants. Mrs. Smita Ghai, PL. for the respondent/State. Mr. Awmd Dubey, counsei for the complainant. Appeiiants nameiy Asraf AiEi & Ramdev complamanr namely Banwari L are idemified by their respectiv Counsei for ihe appellan :s submiis that he is not pressrng & D3/2G11 .as. ihere are some LA. Nos. 01/2011, 32/2011 detects in the eame. Accordi tgly, they are dismissed es not preesed. them h ve become cordiei relations between henceforth they Witt have n9 gr dge against each ether. Heard on LA. No. 04/ 011 f§led under Section 320(1), LA. NO. G5/2Gtt tited under Section 320(2) 8: LA. No. G6/2Gtt tited under Section 320(5) of he Cede of Criminat Proeedure. These apptications are duly s ported by their aftidavits. it has been stated by t settted the dispute between t' end pressure from anyone. t' at with the peeeage of time the and that parttes that they have amicabty eutetde the court wttheut tear u n n m In this View of the mattar and keeping in View tha’z the affence under Section 325 :PC is compbundabie wgth ihe permission of the Com and Section 341 IPC is compoundable even oiherwiee, the app!ications mentioned above are anon/ed and the compromise desired by the pariies is permitted to b entered inio. The reeui‘z of We compromise wouid be the acquitiai of tine eppeliants of ihe offence punishebie under Section 325 & 341 of the indian Penai Coder Order aocordingiy. Sd/- \\r_ i’ritinker Diwaker Judge i ‘m [from e