IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4996 of 2010 Date of Decision : March 31, 2010. Gurjit Kaur .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Lakhwinder S.Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.B.S.Chahal, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.B.S.Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of the order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioner is working as Guest Faculty (Lecturer) in Hindi in respondent No.3-college. She seeks a direction that she be not relieved from her assignments with a view to adjust another Guest Faculty (Lecturer) in her place. C.W.P.No .4996 of 2010 2 Mr.B.S.Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, states that as a matter of policy and subject to the petitioner's eligibility and availability of work, the Guest Faculty (Lecturers) like the petitioner are not to be substituted by another set of Guest Faculty (Lecturers). The writ petition is disposed of in the above-stated terms. Dasti. March 31, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE