s'.\ l^ PETITIONEI Y^^S^ ^-^•r^^-- ...->-[:t^4:'^\^-""" -•^6^?^""" ^•:^c%^ A® c^/ooL— IN THE mOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^^ ^^~~T2006 WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. /^Vjit Kumar Tirky, aged about 39 years, son of Shri Toniyas Tirky, Assistant Teacher, Government Tribal School - Pakartoli, Jashpur Nagar, Distt. Jashpur VERSUS l^. State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2, Assistant Commissioner, Deptt of Tribal Welfare Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER As per cause title. ri^ A.-" RESPONDENTS :,^ y ^\\c^ HI6H COURT OF CHH<tTTtS&<RH AT NUtSPUR W. P. fs) No. 7500 ®f2006 Retitioner : Pcnch Rem Navrong Versus Respondents : Stnte of Oihattiagarh cnd uwltier W. P.folNn. 7Ml<rf2006 Petitioner : Jugal Rom Chakresh Versus Respondwrts : State of ChhatHsgarh ond ano-ther W. P. (sl Nn. TBOe <rf Petitwner : JagdishChondra Yadw Versus Respondents ; Stnte of ChhattisBurh and onolher W. P. (s)Mo. 7S03af2006 Petitionffl- : E)ici Soi Paikra Versus Respondents : Storti of Chherttisgarh and nntrther W. P. (s) No. 7B04 rf 2006 Petitioner : Nondkeshtw Ram Bhcgat Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisaarh ond cnolher W. P. fal No 7B05 uf 200& Petitioner : Samelal Khuntc Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgurh and anolher w. p. (si NB. reoa nf 2006 Petitioner : Smt. Philominu Kintto Versus Respondents ; Storte of Chhath'sgurh ond onother W. P. (slNo. 7B(»af2006 Retitioner : Shyam 5underfwSw Respondents ver$us StateofChhattuaarhandonother 01 W. P. fal No. 7S10 af 2006 Petitioner : Hilariyus ISujur Versus Rupondents : Stcrteof Chhattisgnrh and o-rtiers W. P. fal Nn 7B11 af 2006 Petrtwner : Ku. Rajkumori bahariya Versus ftespondents : Stdte of Chhattisgarh ond olhers W. P. falNo. 7312 <rf 2006 Petitioner : Rong Valtabh Sioka- Versus Respondents : State of ChharM'isgarh ond orwther W. P. fal No. 7B13 <rf 2006 Petitioner : Ramdulnr Kcshtor Versus R&spondents : State of Chhattisoarfi ond olhcrs W. P. fai Nn. 7514 nf 2006 Petitioner : Prodyunm Kumar Versus Respondents : Stnte of Chhattisoarh and olhers W. P. falNn. raiBrf 200ft Petitioner : Smt. Udashiya Minj Versus Itespondents : Stcrti of Chhcrttisnarh cnd onolher W. P. fal NB. 7B1A <rf 200& Petitioner : Tinwthiyus Toppo Versus Reqiondents : Storte of Chhottisgarh and olhers W. P. frt Nn 7517 af 2006 Petitwner : Amr'ft Kwuy Versus : Stete of Chhottisdau4> ond <rthers RMBondents W. P. fal Nn T'SIS af 200& Petitiwier :• DulurEkku Versus Respondents : Stute of Chhattisanrh ond <rthers ML P /ri Na 7B19 af 200& Petitioner : Alfrad Kujur Versus Reapondents : Stcrte of Chhatt'isoarh and enolher W P. fal Petitioner : Prabhu 5ai Tirky Versus Respwidents : S'late of Chhattisgurh cnd olhers W. P. falNff 7?wrf?0% Petitioner : Jagonnurti Rum Veraus Respondenfc : State of Chhottisgarh ond o-thers W. P. (s) Nn 7B23 af 2006 Petitioner : Mahiar 5ai Rnikra Versus Respondents : Stnte of ChbattisBarh and olhers W.P.eriNB. 7B24af20Q& Petitioner : Smt. Rebcka Minj Versas Respondents : State of Chhattiaoarh <nd olhcrs W.P. fsl Ne. 7B2B <rf 200& Petitioner : Ajit Kumar Tirky Versus Respondents : Stnteof ChhattiSBarhendwolher And iy. p. ft> , <rf 2006 Ptetitioner : Rnmkumtu' Banjare Resnondents veras StateofChhattisdnrhaidawfter SB: Honfcte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J Mr. A.N. Bhakta, Admcate for the pe'Mtioners. Mrs. Anju Miuj/a. Deputy Suvemment Advocnte for the reipondents/Stnte. OR & E R (passcd on 9<h <fay of January, 2007) 1. Learncd counsel appearing for •the petitioners as well os teemed Deputy fiovemment Advocate oppearing for the reapondents/Stoite jointly submit that Ihe fuct-s of Itw present cuse are similar to that of in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006 (SuAil Tnwri A ol+iers Vs. SKrte 6ovt. of Chhatt-iqarh & olhers), which »ws allowed vide order darted 7<h November, 2006. They further aubmit that •the questfon of taw involved is also the same. 2. Ih view of ihe abow stated submisswns made by teumed counsel for the pcrt'ies, -these writ petjtions ore alknwed in tBrms of thc order dated 7<h November, 2006 pcssed by -this Court' in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of •this order be ptaced on record in o'ther connccted wffit petitions. Subhash Sd/- Satish K. Agiiihatri Judge