IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2629 of 2006 SATYA NARAYAN MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 22.3.2010. Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, learned Assisting Counsel to SC-3 for the State and learned counsel for the Accountant General are present. The petitioner who superannuated from the post of Village Level Worker with effect from 30.11.2003, had filed the writ petition for payment of his post retiral benefits. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents and in which it is stated that the petitioner after his retirement had absented and became traceless and subsequently when he appeared and fulfilled necessary formalities, his retiral benefits were paid to him and which he has received and nothing remains pending for payment. However, as nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition, it is dismissed for non-prosecution. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.) 2