IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.170 of 2010 SADHU SINGH @ SURENDER KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 25.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that if there would have been meticulous consideration on the fact even shown in the F.I.R. it was not a case of negligence on part of the petitioner as driver of Sudhir Tata 407. Victim/deceased was on petitioner’s bus allegedly was getting down from the bus but in the meantime another bus namely Singh Bus 407 came behind his bus and the victim fell down received injuries and died. However, he remained in custody since 3.2.2010 so petitioner prefers to press the sentence only which in the circumstances existing entitles him for relief on the point of sentence and easily can be minimizing to the period undergone. The revision application is allowed in part on the point of sentence which is minimized to the period undergone. Rest of the judgment and order for conviction is confirmed. The petitioner who is accused in Nashriganj P.S. Case No. 54 of 1995 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bikramganj, 2 District- Rohtas be released forthwith. Let the order be communicated through FAX at the cost of the petitioner in connection with Nashriganj P.S. Case NO. 54 of 1995 from the Court of Sri Janardan Tripathi, Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bikramganj, District- Rohtas. P. Kumar (Mandhata Singh, J.)