IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42496 of 2009 HOSHILA YADAV @ HOSHIL YADAV SON OF LATE BISWANATH YADAV --------- PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 08/12/2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 385 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that no ransom was paid in pursuance to the threatening letter received by the informant, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, in connection with Bagaha P.S. Case No. 25 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. It has been submitted that the petitioner has a long history of criminal cases pending against him but they are on 2 account of the fact that the petitioner’s brother Hare Ram Yadav is said to be a criminal. The petitioner on his release from jail custody is directed to report to the S.P. Bagaha within 15 days of his release and every two weeks thereafter for the next six months. In this period, the S.P. Bagaha will keep on watch on the conduct of the petitioner and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report will be made to the Magistrate concerned for initiating a proceeding for cancellation of bail. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)