1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER STAMP NO.24369 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO.24370 OF 2010 Maheshwari Nagar K and L ...Appellants. v. Sabrina Kannanpilly and Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Vinay J. Hegde adv., for the Appellants. Mr.J.Reis i/by Kunal Cheema,advs., for the respondents. CORAM : J.H.Bhatia, J. DATE : 4TH October, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. It appears that builder constructed several buildings in the same campus and sold flats and parking slots to different persons. Persons, who had purchased flats in each building formed their independent society. Respondents are members of the society different from the appellant/Society but they claim to have purchased parking slots in the stilt of the building of appellant/society from the builder in the year 1996. Disputes are pending between the parties about the rights of the respondents to be member of the appellant-Society. As the respondents have purchased parking slots, legality or otherwise of which is yet to be decided by the 2 Deputy/Joint Registrar. Respondents filed suit no.920 of 2010 while the defendant/society filed suit no.918 of 2010. Both the suits are pending before the trial Court. Trial Court granted notice of motion taken out by the respondents and directed the defendant/society not to interfere in possession of the respondents over the parking slots, which they had purchased from the builder. In view of the given circumstances, I do not see any reason to interfere in the impugned order. 2 Therefore, appeal and the application stand dismissed. However, after question of membership of the respondents in the appellant/society is decided, the trial Court shall hear both the above referred suits together as early as possible and preferably within six months after the final decision of the question of membership. (J.H.BHATIA, J.) 3