IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 22ND JUNE 2009 / 1ST ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 11299 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ SUDHA SUKUMAR, AGED 37, W/O. SUKUMARAN, NJATTUVETTY HOUSE, PAZHUVIL, TRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.N.M.MADHU SMT.C.DEVIKA RANI KAIMAL RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, KSEB, KATTOOR, TRISSUR. ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.11299/09 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DT 14.12.07. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DT 6.3.2009. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 11299 OF 2009 (F) ===================== Dated this the 22nd day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T Implementation of Ext.P1, the order passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Trichur, as early as on 14/12/2007 is the prayer that is sought for. Petitioner submits that she sought shifting of electric lines and that was objected by certain private individuals, which made the respondent herein to move the Additional District Magistrate, resulting in Ext.P1 permitting the 1st respondent to shift the line. It is stated that despite the order having been passed as early as on 14/12/2007 and although the said order has not been challenged by anyone of the parties, the direction therein is not implemented. 2. I heard the standing counsel appearing for the respondent also. Regarding the finality that Ext.P1 has attained, there is no dispute. If that be so, Ext.P1 deserves to be implemented and it is the responsibility of the respondent to do so. 3. Having regard to the finality that Ext.P1 has attained, it is directed that the respondent shall take necessary steps for its WPC 11299/09 :2 : implementation. It is made clear that if the respondent finds it necessary, it will be open to the respondent to approach the Sub Inspector of Police, under whose jurisdiction the area is situated, who on the production of a copy of this judgment, shall render necessary assistance in this behalf. 4. Ext.P1 shall be implemented at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 5. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp