w' ^- c^ ^.l0d( IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATriSGARH AT BILASPUR 3-r^s WRIT PETITION fSl N0. / 2006 PETITIONER: ^Smt. Jayanti Dewangan, W/o Late Shri Shivnath Dewangan, Aged about 49 years, Post- Asistant Grade I, Office of C.E.O, Janpad Panchayat Kondagaon, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh ' ^ Through the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department Government of Chhattisgarh D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur ,(C.G.) -^2. The Collector, District Bastar, Jagdalpur (C.G.) ^•^TSI^* ¥»^3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kondagaon, District Bastar, (C.G.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUENCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBTION, CERTIORARI. AND ANY OTHER WRITS. DIRECTIONS OR ORDERS. / XI-HC-78 sn^T^Tf?^; traT3TI^TsbN *11*<MI Sh*1|ch 3^T ^11<11(1<<, a'Tfl'M'IS, lelc'liyy Trf^.'A).^..^4^^12004 3ll^i ><aw (yii^q^ff) ?T<IRKflf?(T3T1^T 2.8.2006:. Shri Alok Dswangan, coui|isel for the pettt'oner. 'tiiiFi'i'ifl'i tiitidTffteIA<Ri«i< ^srf^iTsn^T Shri Sumesh B^aj, Govt. Heard. By the instant petition, tl|ie petitioner has questioned the relieving order dated 18-7-2006 whereby Bamni. that 2 posts of Assistant Grade- Advocate for the State/respondents. the petitioner has been relieved to join at The main gnwance rais^d by the petitioner in this writ petitton is 1 of the office of C.E.O., Konda^ion were abolished, on those posts Ra|dha Krishna Banjare and Ro<^> Kumar Sarkar were working and ey| were transfared to Block Darbha and Revenue Office, Kondagaon res|pectively about a year back but they have not been retieved so far. In oifder to accommodate them, ths pefltioner has been transferred who is worlpng on the post ofAssistant Grade-1. Leamed counsel for thel petWoner submitted that, therefore, the petitioner may be allowed to i^iake a representation brtnging all these iltegalities to the notice of resp4ndent No.2 and he be dh-ected to decide the same, to which learned coun^el for respondents has no objection. Having heard learned copnsel for the parties, having regard to the facte and circumstances of the|case and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the ^rayer made by teareed counsel for the P.T.O. JS XI-HC-78 ail^T^Tf^lNi craT3:[TWst»11=t) Barve 3's? '^ww^, ®T(1yi6,Ridi+iy *11*1WI SbHl^l ^ 200 3TT^?r'4s|th (lclt^°"y!T) ?¥grwfflN'sn^r -^ <»>i<<fc]<fl-< HiiciTifte^t<Ri«;i< ^iari^Tsn^T petitioner is just, fair and reaso^able. Therefore, the p^idoner is altowed to make a detailed representa<ion along with a copy of thte petWon to respondent No.2 raising all her ^rievances within a period of 10 days from today and in tum, respondent lflo.2 shall decide the representeUon of the petitioner within a period of ^O days from the dats of receipt of the representation, in an objective raised by the petitioner, in accor^lance wth law. WiBi the direction aforesal Parties are entitled for cerjtified cow offtis order. manner, afler considering all Vhe peints id, tte petition stands disposed of. sd'- L.C. ahsffao judge P.T.O.