IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22668 of 2010 VIJAY DAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 06. 02.02.2011 This Court had called for antecedent report in respect of the petitioner from Superintendent of Police Gaya. The antecedent report that has been forwarded states that the petitioner is only accused in the present case. In Court when the petitioner was questioned he himself admitted that he is accused in at least two other cases. A reference to paragraph 69 of the case diary would show that petitioner is involved in other cases under Section 396 and other Sections of Indian Penal Code. Let this matter be brought to the notice of the Superintendent of Police for appropriate action against the person sending the antecedent report. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 30.07.2008 in relation to Raushan ganj P.S.Case No. 40/2008 for offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code read with Arms Act which is pending before the Learned S.D.J.M., Sherghati, District Gaya. It is alleged that police received information that there was a dacoity being committed in the Bank of Baroda. Police rushed to the site, they were on two motorcycle. They were chased and they left the motorcycle and run away.The police could able to apprehend the petitioner from whose pocket a bundle of 10,000/- Rupees was found, all with stamp of Bank of 2 Baroda as well. In the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to interfere in this matter. However the trial Court shall expedite the trial so as to conclude the same within a period of one year subject to petitioner’s co-operating. Namita ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)