IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 21ST AUGUST 2009 / 30TH SRAVANA 1931 Crl.MC.No. 2707 of 2009() ------------------------------------ CRIME NO.181/2009 OF VAZHAKKADU POLICE STATION ...................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 1 TO 4 ----------------------------------------------------- 1. SHAFEER, S/O.MOIDEEN, MOYIKKAL HOUSE, VAZHAKKADU. 2. ABDUL GAFOOR, S/O.ABDUL HAMEED, MANJULASSERY HOUSE, VAZHAKKADU. 3. JAMSHEER, S/O.ABDURAHIMAN, PERICHEERIKOLIL HOUSE, CHEROOPA. 4. ABDULLA.K., S/O.AHAMMADKUTTY, KAITHANA HOUSE, CHEROOPA. BY ADV. MR.SUNNY MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. ABDUL AZEEZ, S/O.ALIKUTTY HAJI, VELATTIL HOUSE, P.O.MAVOOR, CALICUT. 2. STATE OF KERALA THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VAZHAKKADU POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM. R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.AMJAD ALI. R1 BY ADV. MR.K.H.SAKIR. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. ------------------------------------------ CRL.M.C.NO.2707 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------ Dated 21st August 2009 O R D E R Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.181/2009 of Vazhakkadu police station registered under Annexure-A1 FIR on recording the first information statement of first respondent for the offences under Section 511 of Section 380 of Indian Penal Code. This petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to quash the FIR and the further proceedings contending that the entire disputes with first respondent were amicably settled. A joint statement is filed by first respondent along with petitioners stating that there was an amicable settlement of the disputes and in such circumstances, first respondent has no grievance against the petitioners and therefore the case is to be quashed. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor on instructions submitted that statement of first respondent recorded subsequently shows that there was a settlement of the disputes between the parties. In CRMC 2657/09 2 such circumstances, it is not in the interest of justice to continue the prosecution. The prosecution is to be quashed. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that while granting bail as directed by the learned Magistrate, passport of the first petitioner was produced before the learned Magistrate and it may be directed to be released immediately. If the passport of first petitioner is produced before the learned Magistrate in this case to release him on bail, it be released forthwith. Petition is allowed. Crime No.181/2009 of Vazhakkadu police station as against petitioners is quashed. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE. uj.