1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE APPEAL NO. 467 OF 1999 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2411 OF 1998 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.223 OF 1998 IN AWARD NO.19 OF 1998 Union of India & ors., represented by General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai. Appellants vs. M/s.Kothari & Co. Respondent Mr.Anand Samant for the appellants. Mr.M.S. Rane i/b. M/s.Purnanand & Co. for the respondent. CORAM : R. M. LODHA & J.P. DEVADHAR,JJ DATED : 2nd September 2004 P.C. Not on board. 2. On the praecipe taken out by the learned counsel for the appellants, we took up the matter. 3. The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the certified copy of the judgment was applied for on 12th July 2004, but it was made available on 31st August 2004 and, therefore, the amount deposited by the appellants should not be paid to the respondents at least for two weeks beyond the time mentioned in 2 paragraph 7 of the judgment. 4. The learned counsel for the respondent vehemently opposed the application. He submits that the certified copy of the judgment dated 8th July 2004 was made available to the respondents on 20th July 2004 and, therefore, there was no laxity on the part of the office. 5. We are not persuaded to give any further direction beyond already stated in paragraph 7 of the judgment. Order accordingly. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) (J.P. (J.P. (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) DEVADHAR,J.) DEVADHAR,J.)