Civil Revision No. 1980 of 2006 (O&M) 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 1980 of 2006 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.10.2008 Kaushalaya Devi and Others …Petitioners Versus Rukmani Devi ... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Jaswant Jain, Advocate for the respondent. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Civil Misc. No. 20435-CII of 2008 Civil Misc. Application is allowed. Statement of Sanjay is taken on record. Civil Revision No. 1980 of 2006 It is not disputed that application under Section 6A of the Haryana Urban Control of Rent Restriction and Eviction Act, 1973, was filed by Jagdish Chander and his son Sanjay. Before the application could be decided, on 6.12.2003 Jagdish Chander expired. The application, vide impugned order, was declined on 9.2.2006. It is not disputed that the tenancy is inheritable and Sanjay Civil Revision No. 1980 of 2006 (O&M) 2 being one of the legal heirs of Jagdish Chander can always step into the shoes of tenant. Therefore, taking this fact into consideration that Jagdish Chander has expired and Sanjay along with other petitioners was legal heirs to the tenancy, application ought to have been decided. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the case is remanded back to learned Rent Controller to decide the application afresh after giving opportunity to both the parties. Parties through their learned counsel shall appear before learned Rent Controller on 14.11.2008. The present revision petition is disposed off. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge October 22, 2008 “DK”