IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No.9585 of 2008 Date of decision : August 11, 2011 Joginder Singh …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and another …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunita Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. Surjit Singh, Judge(Oral) The matter is covered by judgment dated 26th April, 2010, delivered by another Bench of this Court, in Mohinder Singh versus State of H.P. & anr., CWP(T) No.9554 of 2008. The facts and the points raised in the said petition were similar to the facts and the points raised in this petition. In that case, petition had been allowed and the petitioner was directed to be re-engaged as daily-waged Chain Man and was ordered to be entitled to continuity of service and seniority, though he was held to be not entitled to back wages. So, the present petition is also allowed. Impugned order Annexure A-2, dated 21st July, 2003, is quashed. Respondents are directed to re-engage the petitioner as Chain Man in Kangra Division at Dharamshala, with immediate effect. Petitioner shall Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? …2… be entitled to continuity of service and seniority as Chain Man, but will not be entitled to back wages. Writ petition stands disposed of, with the aforesaid direction. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. August 11, 2011(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J