1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2304 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2303 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant VERSUS Dr. Bhaskar Sitaram Joshi and ors. ...Respondents ..... Shri S.D.Kaldate, A.P.P. for applicant Shri Joydeep Chatterjee, advocate for respondent nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5. Respondent no.2 already expired and application abates against him. ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 5 th August, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Heard Shri S.D.Kaldate, A.P.P. for applicant and Shri Joydeep Chatterjee, advocate for respondent nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5. Respondent no.2 already expired and application abates against him. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 3 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Application seeking leave to file appeal against the 2 judgment and order of acquittal dated 15.3.2010 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Parbhani in S.C.C. NO. 4109 of 2010. 3 For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and it further appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying application is not willful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 Hence, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 3 days causing in filing the accompanying application seeking leave to file appeal stands condoned and the present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap2304.10