IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID MONDAY, THE 5TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 14TH BHADRA 1933 RP.No. 1132 of 2009(C) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.19262/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/5TH RESPONDENT: --------------------------------------------- JOSE ANTONY LIVERO, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.JOHN ROY LIVERA, RESIDING AT 18/3, NEO COTTAGE, THOPPUMPADI, KOCHI-5. BY ADV. MR.P.K.IBRAHIM MR.C.N.GOPAKUMAR RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER: -------------------------------- 1. P.A.MARTIN, S/O.ANTHAPPAN, POLLAYIL HOUSE, SAUDI, MUNDAMVELI P.O., KOCHI-7. 2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COCHIN, ERNAKULAM. 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT, FORT KOCHI. 5. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION STANDING COMMITTEE, CORPORATION OF COCHIN. ADV. MR.C.M.SURESH BABU FOR R3-5 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: RP.No. 1132 of 2009(C) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A1(a): APPLICATION DTD. 9.10.2009 SEEKING INFORMATION REGARDING EXT.P9 AND P10. ANNEXURE A1(b): REPLY DTD. 12.10.2009 GIVEN BY THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER OF THE COCHIN CORPORATION. ANNEXURE A1(c): RECEIPT DTD. 9.7.09 ISSUED TO R1. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL .... // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ R.P.No.1132 of 2009 in W.P.(C).No.19262 Of 2009 ---------------------- Dated this the 5th day of September, 2011. O R D E R The review petitioner is aggrieved by the judgment dated 9.7.2009 in W.P.(C).No.19262 Of 2009, which was passed at the admission state without notice to the review petitioner. 2. This Court disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage without issuing notice directing the standing committee of the Corporation of Cochin to consider and pass orders on Ext.P10 within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. In view of the limited relief extended to the petitioner and in view of the dismissal of W.P.(C). No.27265/2005, this Court is of the view that the review petitioner has not made out any ground to review the judgment. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-