^s^^-s^-^'s^ •?—' '' H. .iiF LN_THE^HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. ^CJDC1 /2005 PETITIONER ^^ ^;:w" ^y <A?>-' ^/:' ^^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS Ratan Kumar Gajbhiye, S/o. Late Shri B.D. Gajbhiye, Aged about 46 years, Presently Posted as Range Officer, Udanti Abhyaran, Udanti Van Mandal Gariyabandh, Raipur (C.G.) ^ /' 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Forest Department, Secretariat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Divisional Forest Officer, Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamundj (C.G.) 1 3. Manoj Kumar Shah, S/o.Not known, Forest Range Officer, Special. Duty, Forest Range Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 +11+IC11 »»*11Ct» 3^T •^ll<41d<4, ^Tfl^^Ko, f^dl^y Tq^..^3..B<5^?)y.. ^ 200^ ^5 W^[ W^h (<ic<^^<T) 3TI^T^TRRW cT§TT3TT^Tsh^|cb, 5^TTW;BlW3n^T Oovt, naitie 20-6-2006 Mr, Anaad Kumiar Tiwaril Mr, A.S. Kachhawaha, No.l 8& 2. Mr. Pi-aveen Das, counsel Heaxd. By the iastaat writ peti|ti< Forest Range: Officer at Udaii^i has questioned legality,proprie|i 11-2005 (ADiiexiirc P-1) issued) Chhattisgarh, Department of F^ Maaoj Kuniar Shah whose list has bcen posted on fhe posjt and ia rcspect of tfae petitioa^ passed, Thercfore, by tlie imi has created a position, whic}]| respondent No.3, as well as the I fail to understaad howl authorities where tfaerc is onlfe persons caa work on one post. of such orders number of petit distinctlv rexaieniber that 2-3 Court in which wifhout thcre b< traasferred to Distnct: Kankei order. Thereforc, tlie Chief Seci the raatter and apprise his Offi< which not only force fhe Officets <=hl<4ld41T1 ^l^dT^te^'<f^l^< ^3:rf^T3TT^T counsel for the petitioner. wt Advocate for the State/respondents for respondent No.3. iou, the petitioner, who is working as AbhayaraQ Forcst Raage Oailyaband, y aad corrcctness ofttie order dated 17- by flie Special Secretaiy, Govermaent of >rcst, whereby respondent No.3 namely, appears at serial No.4 in the transfer wherc fhe petitioner is alrcady workiag no order rcgardmg posting has been lugaed order, learaed Special Secrctary has brought both the petitioner aad |State in Utigation, such oxders are beiag passed by the ^ one sanctioned post, then faow two It is not the first instance. On accoiint ^ons are beiag filed m fhis Court aad I back a niatter caine up before fhis ^mg any post vacaxxt, oue TehsUdar was and ffais Court perforce stayed that rtary of the State is directed to look mto ^ers to refinaia fix>m passing such ordera to go into litigatioii, but the State is a^ys XI-HC-78 sn^T^Tf^rN? pr^TTOT^T^n^ Soma *11*1(<11 S»»*11<t» TS[ ^ww^, ^>-^\vl\<o, {si<ni<-i^< ,.^.^..^stcm^. )f<> ^ 200^ 3ii^i ^5icn (^cit^q<^T) B^TTW^f^T^TT^T - ^ Dep|artment s|o also foixsed to go into litigatioi^.. i,e. the Special Secretaxy, order iii fhe iastaat case, sanctioned post and other] sanctioned post»wifhm a peri^ Wifh fhe obsenratioa arl disposed of. Consequenffy, M.fiV.] Nos.9838/2005 aad 1034/20<: Additional Registrar (Ju^icial) post and fax for compliaace. Parties are entitled for ci <=bi^T<"i41Ti ^H<nTfff^t<Ri1(-<-j< ^3rf^T3:n^T He should direct the concemed Officer of Forest, to pass an appropnate fhat one person remaias against fbe person is posted on another vacant id oftwo weeks fix>m today. d direction aforcsaid, fhe petition staods iP.Nos.4702/2005, 276/2006, I.A. )6 also stand disposed of. to sencl copy offhis order by speed ^rtified copy of fhis order, Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ^¥