1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.3007 OF 1990. Bachhu Nanaji Tamboli : Plaintiff. Versus Kewalkumar Vasudev Patil & ors. : Defendants. Ms.J.A.Sarkhot i/by Mr.R.V.Govilkar for the Plaintiff. Ms.P.S.Cardoz for the Defendant Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J DATED : DECEMBER 16, 2008 P.C. 1. Not on board. Mentioned by filing precipe. 2. The learned counsel for the Plaintiff and the Defendant Nos.1 and 2 tender Consent Terms recording the settlement between the parties. The said Consent Terms have been signed by the Plaintiff and Defendant Nos.1 and 2 and their respective advocates. The Plaintiff and the Defendant Nos.1 and 2 are personally present in Court. The said Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The learned counsel for the Plaintiff states that the 2 Suit against the Defendant Nos.3 and 4 is withdrawn. It appears that the Plaintiff has filed the original rent receipt and the photo pass issued in his favour with the Court Commissioner appointed for recording of evidence. The Plaintiff has no objection, if the Defendant Nos.1 and 2 are allowed to take back the said rent receipt and the photo pass. The Suit is, therefore, disposed of in terms of the said Consent Terms. The Plaintiff would be entitled to refund of Court Fees, if any, as per Rules. [R.M.SAVANT, J]