IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.343 of 2011 MD. MAKSUD ALAM @ FEKU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ----------- 3 16.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Notices were issue to opposite party no.2 on 18.01.2011. It appears from the record that in spite of the service of notice none is appearing on behalf of the opposite party no.2. The petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. In the circumstances, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Complaint Case No. 1937/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The grant of bail to the husband will not preclude the complainant to file an appropriate application before the learned court below if she wants to resume the conjugal life when the learned court below will issue notice to the petitioner when the petitioner will take the complainant to her matrimonial house. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)