IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 21ST KARTHIKA 1930 RP.No. 1197 of 2008(C) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.22080/2008 Dated 19/09/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/ PETITIONER; --------------------------------- K.K.KUNJUMON, S/O.KUNJAPPAN, AGED 55 YEARS, KAITHAVALAPPIL HOUSE, ELAMKUNNAPUZHA, ERNAKULAM 682 503. BY ADV. SRI.SABU THOZHUPPADAN RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS: --------------------------- 1. THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 3. THE SECRETARY, CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM. 5. THE NAYARAMBALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. E-92, NAYARAMBALAM, ERNAKULAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR FOR R1 & 2 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR FOR R3 & R4 SRI. GOVIND K. BHARATHAN, SC FOR R5 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------ Review Petition No.1197 of 2008 in W.P.(C) No. 22080 of 2008 (C) ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 12th day of November, 2008 J U D G M E N T Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the fifth respondent bank. 2. The primary issue raised in the writ petition regarding appointments of Grievance Redressal Officer in the co-operative institutions have now been taken care of and appointments have been made. 3. In so far as the case of the petitioner is concerned, I deem it appropriate that the finding in the judgment sought to be reviewed needs to be vacated, leaving the petitioner to agitate before the Grievance Redressal Officer, on the correctness of the refusal of the entire waiver of his claim by the petitioner. Review Petition No.1197 of 2008 in W.P.(C) No. 22080 of 2008 (C) -2- In the meanwhile, since W.P.(C) 22080 OF 2008 and this Review Petition were pending, it is ordered that time fixed for the petitioner to make payment of 25 percentage in terms of the waiver already granted will stand extended for a period of one month from now. This Review Petition is disposed of in the above terms, preserving all the rights of the petitioner, de hors findings if any, in the judgment sought to be reviewed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE skr/13/11 // True copy // P.A. to Judge.