@ Smgh Hanan BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR jC.G.[ w.P.(S) No. gm} OF 2011 PETITIONER z Samay Lal Satranj, S/o Shri UR. Satranj, aged about 45 @W Years, U.D.T., ST. Post Mame Boys Hostel Champa Distt. Janjgir Champa C.G. W“ WW VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of ChhattiSgarh (C.G.) Through The Secretary, Tribal Department, D. K. S Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. (Assistant Commissioner Tribal and Welfare Department Janjgir Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. KIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BELASPUR SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER w.P.1sy.no 500’u2011 PETITIONER Samay Lal Satranj VEI‘SuS RESPONDENTS State of 0G. Ex. Others Shn' Somkant Verma, counsel for thi: petitioners. Shri Pgaveen Das, Dy. GA. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 225 OF THE CONSTITUTI$N OF IND!A mama (29.08.2011) Conn sel far the pst’itioner submits mat his case is covered, with the case. of Asha Saxena Vs. State of M.P. 85 Ors. 2009 (XIIWWJR (SC) 59 for grant of two advance increments as the petitioner haS done BEd. He submits that he may be permitted 1.0 withdraw this petition with liberty to make representation and in. turn direction may be issued to the respondents to consider the ease of the petjtjooer in accordance with law. State counsel points out that so far as the Tribal department is concerned till date no such circular has heen issued and therefote the petitioner is not entitled for the benefit of two advance irxctements as per the decision of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra). Be that as it may, in the eveutuality of making any such representation by the yetitioner, it is expected that the same wouid be decided as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. it is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the metits of the case and the authority concerned would be at, liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law.