THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5226 OF 2005 20th August 2009 Between: Harshal Shinde, S/o.Dr.Pramod S.Shinde, 32 years,Architect, R/o.D-2, R.K.Residency, Road No.11, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. …PETITIONER AND 1. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, MCH Complex, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. And one other. …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5226 OF 2005 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.1939 of 2005 in the Court of the VI Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against the respondents for the relief of perpetual injunction. They have also filed I.A.No.671 of 2005 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 {CPC}, for the relief of ad interim injunction. During the course of enquiry into the I.A., they filed I.A.No.994 of 2005 under Order XI Rule 14 CPC with a prayer to summon certain documents mentioned therein. The trial Court rejected the I.A. Hence, the appeal. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondents. I.A.No.994 of 2005 filed by the petitioner was totally untenable. The adjudication of I.A. filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC takes place on the basis of an affidavit or certain documents, some times even the xerox copies. Further, the very fact that the petitioner wanted certain documents called from other sources, discloses that he was not at all sure, about the basis for his claim. In case, the documents were so important, he ought to have obtained certified copies thereof and file into the Court. At any rate, the suit has crossed the stage of adjudication of I.A. filed under Order XXXIX9 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ (L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J) 20th August 2009 RRB