IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3104 of 2011. Decided on: 9th May, 2011. Vishwajit Singh ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and ors. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by his transfer. It is not in dispute that he is in the present station for around 8 years. But, his submission is that his wife is physically challenged to the extent of 50% permanent. It is also pointed out that he has again been transferred to a difficult area and in case, he is to be transferred from the present station, there are other places also, where the vacancies are available. There are other grievances, as well. All these aspects, the petitioner may point out before the second respondent by way of an appropriate representation. In the event of such a representation being filed within a period of ten days from today, the same shall be duly considered by the second respondent and appropriate orders shall be passed thereon within another two weeks in accordance with law and justice. The petitioner may not be compelled to join the transferred station till such time and in case, in the mean while, he is relieved, it will be open for him to avail the leave of kind due. 2. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 9th May, 2011 ( Justice Sanjay Karol ), (pankaj/rana) Judge.