IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 5885 of 2008 Between: Rahman Khan, S/o.Late Yasin Khan, Rep by his Guardian, Mrs.Humaira Khan, W/oMuneeruddin Khan, aged 40 H.No.l18-5-653/2, Mekalabanda, Aliabad,Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 District Educational Officer,Hyderabad District. At Aliya College Compound, Nampally,Hyderabad. 2 Deputy Educational Officer, Bahadurpura Mandal, Hyderabad. At Govt., Boys High school, Moghulpura, 3 Regional Joint Director of School Education Hyderabad. At Government Junior College Kachiguda, Kachiguda Hyderabad 4 Maheshwari Vidyalaya School, Old KabutarKhana,Hussaini Alam, Hyderabad.Rep by its Head Master. 5 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Dept.of School Education, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a "Writ of Mandamus" or any other writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in not initiating action against the 4th respondent and consequential action of the respondent No.4 in not issuing the Memorandum f Marks and transfer Certificates to the petitioner as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith initiate action against the respondent No.4 and further direct the respondents to issue Memorandum of Marks and Transfer Certificate and other related certificates to the petitioner without any further delay. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.N.NAVEEN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No.5885 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of respondents 1 to 3 in not initiating action against fourth respondent-School for not issuing the Memorandum of Marks and Transfer Certificate to the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary. When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader for School Education, under instructions, submitted that the District Educational Officer, the first respondent herein, was informed by the fourth respondent that some unknown persons have approached the School and asked the Transfer Certificate of the petitioner orally, after three years of passing the examination and that they have asked the applicant to make an application in writing and bring the student for identification, but the same is not complied with. In view of the submission of the learned Government Pleader, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the first respondent to respond to the petitioner’s representation, dated 28.02.2008, informing the petitioner the fact position and the necessary steps to be taken, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _______________ 28.04.2009 VGB