1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8630 OF 2009 Gopalkrishna Oil Mill & another .. PETITIONERS VERSUS Dena Bank & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. M.M. Bhokarikar, Advocate for the petitioners. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 19th MARCH, 2010 PER COURT : 1 An interlocutory order passed during the continuance of the suit is subjected to challenge at the instance of original defendants in this writ petition. 2 Respondent / original plaintiff presented a suit in the year 2000 claiming recovery of amount of Rs.6,76,526/- alongwith interest against the defendants. In the pending suit, an application was presented at exh. 74 requesting the court to direct the plaintiff to produce certain documents. 2 Respondent herein / original plaintiff filed say contending that the documents are not in possession of the plaintiff. Considering the contentions raised, the trial court proceeded to reject the application. 3 In my opinion, the documents requested for from the custody of the plaintiff has no bearing with the subject matter of the suit. Suit is presented in the year 2000 in respect of recovery of amount and is yet pending for final disposal. Presentation of application is one of the attempts to prolong the litigation. In exercise of powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, no interference is called for in the instant petition. Writ petition therefore stands rejected summarily. Trial court is however, directed to dispose of the pending suit expeditiously. 4 In view of dismissal of suit, pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp8630.09.odt