IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3265 of 2008 Date of decision: 17.2.2009 Jai Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus Balwant Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Tapan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kanwalbir Singh, Advocate for Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate the respondents S.D.ANAND, J. The defendants-petitioners are in revision against the order dated 31.1.2008 vide which a plea qua impleadment under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. was allowed. The plea, in support of the application under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. was that the applicants inherited tenancy rights in the land in suit as heirs of their predecessor-in-interest-father Chuna. As against it, the plaintiffs-petitioners resisted that plea by averring that the name of the predecessor-in-interest had been deleted from the revenue record. Learned Trial Court noticed that “from revenue records, there is ample evidence to conclude that present applicants have inherited tenancy rights in suit property”. Qua the plea of resistance, learned Trial Court observed that “on the other hand, learned counsel for respondents/plaintiffs has not placed on file any revenue record to support the alleged valid deletion of names of applicants from revenue records, moreover, fact remains that all brothers had inherited tenancy rights in suit land.” The petition is completely bereft of merit and is ordered to be dismissed. February 17, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge