1 28.cas.1652.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1652 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 163 OF 1995 Smt. Bhikubai A. Solaskar .... Applicant VERSUS Shri. Sopan Pandurang Solaskar (since Decd. Thr. L/H) 1A) Shilabai Sopan Salaskar and ors. .... Respondents Ms. Pratibha Shelke, i/by P. J. Thorat for Applicant. Mr. Atul Katkar, i/by Dilip Bodake for Respondents. CORAM: K. K. TATED, J. DATED: JANUARY 11, 2011. P.C.: Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The present Civil Application for issuing fresh notice to the Respondent No. 4 in Civil Application No. 394 of 2010. The 2 28.cas.1652.10 learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant submits that when the Civil Application No. 394 of 2010 was listed before Registrar on 2 nd August, 2010 with a remark that Notice issued to Opponent No. 4 i.e. Shankar Eknath Dhumal was returned back with Bailiff's remark “He was not found as he left said premises.” Thereafter, the Applicant tired to find out the present correct address of Respondent No. 4. At that time, he learnt that the Respondent No. 4 is presently residing at the address mentioned in cause title. 3. Considering the submissions made by learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant and the averments made in Civil Application, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads as under: “That by an Order of this Hon'ble Court, the Applicant may be permitted to serve Opponent No. 4 the notice of Civil Application No. 394 of 2010 at the fresh address as shown in the cause 3 28.cas.1652.10 title of the present Civil Application.” Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (K. K. TATED, J.)