-A @ INGLE BENCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR Writ Petition (Civil) No^3^2-of2011 PETITIONERS: ^ ^r}H^ ^ ^;-yy ^y- /"y' ...<^ ^'••^ ^°"< ^'.^ .0 ^ ^-" RESPONDENTS: 01. Dilip Kumar, S/o Nipendra Kumar, Aged about 70 years, R/o Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Through Power of Attorney Holder Shri Shreeman Narayan Gole S/o S.N. Gole, Aged about 42 years, R/o Opposite Career Point, Dayalband, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 02. Shri Shreeman Narayan Gole S/o S.N. Gole, Aged about 42 years, R/o Opposite Career Point, Dayalband, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus 01. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 02. Collector, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur(C.G.) 03. Tahsildar, Bilaspur, Distt. Biiaspur (C.G.) 04. Registrar under the Registration Act, Bilaspur, Distt. / Bilaspur (C.G.) 05. Patwari, Khamtarai, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226^»FTHECONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS, DIRECTIONS ETC.. IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ^UaJ^ ^\^\ HIGI-I COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH:_BILASPU_R WRIT PETITION (Clvit) N0. 5362 OF 2011 PETiTIONERS Diiip Kumar & Xnother Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others RESPONDENTS CvVrit Petitlon under Artlcle 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satlsh K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Dr. N.K.Shukia, Senior Advocate with Shri Aditya Khare, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER (Passed on this 12ti1 day of September, 2011) 1. By this petition, the petitioners seek a direction to the respondent authorities to issue 22 points document in favour of the petitioner No.1. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the application ofthe petitioners for issue of22 pointe document in favoyr of the petitioner No.1, who intends to seil the land in question, has been refused by the respondents No.3 & 5 in an iiiegal and arbitrary manner. Learned counsei further submits that the said document is veiy much necessar^ for registration of the iand. 3. Learned counsei appearing for the State submits that if the appSication of the petitioners, as alieged has not been accepted by the Patwari, the same shail be accepted, if a fresh application for the same is filed. Necsssary appropriate order shaii be passed, tnereafter, within a penod of four weeks, in accordance with law and on its o'wn merit.. 4. Jn view of foregoing, iearned counsei appearing for the petitioners submits that nothing survives for sdjudication at thjs stage. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. ashok Sd/- , _ Sa<tebK.W»bnc* Judge