’ V 1 i§¥§3§§ @ C9 .z: IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. [SI No. gag Ea [2010 RESPONDENTS PETITIONER : / Parmeshwar Lal Sahu S/o Shree Devcharan Sahu, aged about 4O years, presently posted as Upper Division Teacher at Government Middle School Navagaon Teh. Katghora, District Korba. (C.G.) VERSUS l. State of Chhattisgarh, Through—Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare , Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) f ' 2. Commissioner, Department of w Tribal Welfare Raipur, District Raipur.(c.G.) 3. Assistant Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare Korba , District Korba , (C.G.) /4. Treasury Officer, Treasury Acconut and Pension, Korba District Korba. (CsGJ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ;4 E Wga ' ’ " mm m mm» «givgi‘qk ’WW‘3WW %Wm SB 24-. 1 1.2010 Shn' Sanjcey Kumar Sahu, Shn' Ajit Singh, P.L. for the Counsel for the petitioner enu'tled to benem of two advanci haVing passed B,’I‘.I. cxamination own cost. It is submitted that th‘ petition is no longer res integfa: decided by the Hon’ble Supxem Saxena Vs. state of M.P. 85 Ors. It is further submitted tha1 similar view in its order dated 6. 6257/ 2008. Counsel for the peu'tioner further submits that the onier dated 29.4.2010 passed in‘ wherein relying upon the judgme case ofAsha Saxena (supra; and WM : HDN’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER counsel for the petitioner. Siam. submits that the petitioner is 3 incxements on account of he . before his appointment at his : issue involved in the present and the same has been finally e Court in the case of Asha 2009 (llllMPJR (801 59. : this Court has also taken a 2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. wet Appeal No. 124/2099, of the Supreme Court in the e order passed by this Court . ¢ i Counsel for the State submitL that case of the petitioner \ would also be oonsidexed on the saxjne lines. . k 1 i J ; '\ \ [W kfw ; in another Wn't Appea1 No. 87 2009, dnecséns have been ; issued for consideration of the c se for giant of two advanc 1 increments as per circular dated 1.9.1974 issued by the State or Madhya Pradesh, after veeecati n of the facts pleaded in the : petition. / e dixeciion'to the respondent authc pctitioner for grant of two advax dated 21.9.1974 issucd by the 5 veriflcaiion of the facts pleaded in eight weeks fmm today. It is made clear that this opinion on merits of the ease would be at liberty to decide tht with law. In View of above, the petition is disposed of with a Iities to decide the claim of the ace increments as per circular §tate of Madhya Pradesh after the petition. within a period of Court has not expnessed ahy and the authon'ty concemed same suictly in accmdance Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker J ‘ Judge "//, [q'm khan};