Stf BENC ^ ^? i<^7— BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITION (C) N0. U^A^^ / 2010 PETITIONER ^ ^^^t^ >°.%^ ^y'"^^'^^ •^^^y"' ^I<y%>,'.-"" ^•" ^- ^•^v' \^..-- y RESPONDENT .rf^"'!:::'""^ .,,^ '••¥' ^-w.«^^"-^y^\ "'^ Ranjeet Kumar Narwani S/o. Late Shri Laxmandas Narwani, aged about 21 years, R/o. Panchsheel Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Through- it's Commissioner, District Raipur (C.G.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA. MI<»ICOURTOJ=CMHATriSGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C^ N0.4432 of 2010 Petttioner Ran^s^ Kumar Nafwani Versus Respondent Munteipal Corporatton, Ralpur. WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TOE (»NSTITUTIONOP INDIA (SB: Hon'-bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:" Ms. Nausina Afrin AH, writh Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocates for the petltioner. ; Shri Panteij Agrawal, Advocate f@r the respondent. 0 DERtt)RALl (Passed on 12tn day of August, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation submits that there is no contemplation for demolition of any structure, which is duly legal and authorised, in respect of the pettttoner, withoyt affording proper opportuntty of hearing to the petitjoner. 1 2. Shri Agrawat further submlts that no demolition in respect of (he property in dispute shall be done wlthout affording opportunfty @f hearing to the petitioner. 3. In view of foregoing, nothing remains (n this petttion for adjudication.Accorcllngly, the petition is disRiissed wtth tNe above- stated observation. 4. No orderasto costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Ashok