Cr.MP(M) No. 234 of 2011 19.4.2011 Present: Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. A.G. with Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Deputy A.G. for the Judgment Debtor. This application has not been considered on merits for the reason that the evidence of the prosecution is being recorded. In these circumstances, it would be in the fitness of things if the petitioner approaches the learned trial Court for grant of bail in accordance with law. This Court has been apprised of the fact that out of the five accused, three accused namely Pawan Kumar, Jagjeet Singh and Deepati have been bailed out. One submission has been made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that rejection of bail on 28.2.2011 would constitute a bar in moving petition for bail again. This apprehension is unfounded. The examination of each witness in the Court constitutes a changed circumstance. Another submission has been made on behalf of the petitioner that the trial Court is unnecessarily dragging the case as the petitioner is in custody for the last two years. In these circumstances, it is directed that the learned trial Court shall make an endeavour to dispose of this case not later than 31st March, 2012. Petition stands disposed of. Liberty reserved to the petitioner to move this Court again in accordance with law. April 19, 2011 (Dev Darshan Sud), ms Judge