IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD. FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE. PRESENT THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENAKUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR. WRIT APPEAL No. 9 8 8 of 2009. Between: Smt. N. Veera Raghavulu, w/o. Sri N.Satyanarayanamurthy, R/o. 8-2-674/B/2/23A-15, C2, Land Mark Enclave, Happy Valley, Road No. 13-A, Happy Valley, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-34. … Appellant-Writ Petitioner V/s. The Government of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & Ors. …. Respondents- Respondents Counsel for the Appellant : SRI M.V. DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GOVT. PLEADER FOR REVENUE THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 9 8 8 OF 2009. J U D G M E N T : (Per the Hon'ble Smt. Justice T. Meenakumari) The writ appeal is filed against order dated 21-7-2009 passed in WP.No. 14562 of 2009 by the learned single Judge, whereby the learned single Judge directed the first respondent to dispose of the revision dated 25-11-2007 filed by the writ petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order dated 21-7- 2009 passed in WP.No.14562 of 2009. 2. Facts in brief are that the writ petitioner purchased assigned lands in an extent of Acs:5-00 each in Survey Nos. 36/AA/19, 36/AA/20, 36/AA/16 situated at Gopanapally village of Serilingampally Revenue Mandal in Ranga Reddy district, under registered sale deeds bearing Document Nos. 3938/1981, dated 30-6-1981, 125/1981 dated 21-1-1981 and 128/1981 dated 22-1- 1981 respectively. Thereafter, mutation was also effected in her favour in the records of rights and her name was entered in pattedar as well as possessor columns of the pahnies from the year 1982-83 onwards till 2003. While things stood thus, the fourth respondent passed an order dated 16-1-2004 under section 4 of the AP Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 in Proceedings No. B/2545/2003 holding the writ petitioner to be the purchaser of assigned lands, whose alienation is prohibited and directed her eviction. Aggrieved by the same, the writ petitioner filed an appeal to the third respondent, which was dismissed on 15-7-2006. Thereafter, she filed further appeal under section 4-A of the said Act to the second respondent, which was ultimately dismissed on 17-7-2007. Aggrieved by the dismissal of further appeal, she filed a revision to the first respondent under section 4 (B) of the said Act on 25-11-2007 along with interim relief of seeking suspension of the primary order. Her main grievance in the writ petition was that the first respondent has neither disposed of the revision nor the application for interim relief. Having heard the counsel for the writ petitioner, the learned single Judge directed the first respondent to dispose of the revision within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order dated 21-7-2009 passed in wP.No.14562 of 2009. 3. Sri M.V. Durga Prasad, the learned counsel representing the appellant submitted that pending disposal of the main revision filed by her, in any event, there is every likelihood of dispossession by the respondents. If the appellant is dispossessed, she will be put to irreparable loss and injury. 4. Having heard the learned counsel representing the appellant and in the light of the facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to modify the order dated 21-7- 2009 passed in WP.No.14562 of 2009 by the learned single judge, as that of granting statusquo pending disposal of the revision filed by her. Till such time, both parties are directed to maintain statusquo obtaining as on today i.e., 31-7-2009. 5. Subject to the above modification, the writ appeal is disposed of at the stage of admission. No costs. 6. As a sequel to the disposal of the main writ appeal, WAMP.No. 2000 of 2009 filed by the appellant for interim suspension of the order dated 16-1-2004 passed in Proceedings No. B/2545/2003, by the fourth respondent as confirmed in Proceedings bearing Lr.No.D/10/2006, dated 15-7-2006 by the third respondent and second respondent in Case No. E/1506/2007, dated 17-7-2007 is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI. ________________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR. 31-07-2009. I s L