\-': y(e.s&' Aa^ ^> ,....--"' <^¥1/e^2— BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATJISGARH ATBILASPUR W.PfS)No. ^J^J of 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^'. Lagnu Ram Choudhary, S/o Late Shri Lachchhan Ram Choudhary, Headmaster, Government Primary School, Chichola, Block-Chhuriya, District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : the Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2.' District Education Officer, .Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. r Block Education Officer, Block- Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226^EIHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ' ^^"^^. ^ NiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARn : BiLASPuR Sjnaie Bench: Hon'bie Shri Tvianindra Mohan Shnva.stova, J. PETiTiONER REoPGNDENTS WRjT PETiTiGN (S) N0.4589/201 u Lagnu Ram Choudhary Versys State of Chhattisgarh and others ^' "'^ WRiT PETITSGN UNDER ARTtCLE 226 GF THE GONSiTUTiO?'! GFJ^mA i Pressnt: - Shrl Gautam Khetrapal, counsei for t'ne petitloner. Ivis. Srnita Ghai, Panei Lawyer for the State. ORAL . . (Passed on 18 ofAugust, 2010) The peuuoner was initiany appointed as Assistant Teacher on a flxed pay of Rs.100/-. Mer compieuon of his probauori period, he was granted regular pay scaie. 2. Leamed counsei appearing for the petitloner subrnltted that the issue invoived in the case is as to whether the petjtioner Is entltled to reguiar pay scale with effect from the date of initiai appointment o? after compietion of probation period. 3. The issue involved herein was considered by the JVSadhya Pradesh State Adminisuative Tribunal, Jabalpur in OA.No.2745/88 (Madnuriani Yadu anu 56 Others v\ Stefe ofMR & otrwrs), whereln it was held that the slmiEariy situated teachers are entitied to reguiar pay scaie with effect from ihe date of jnltlal appointment. The rnatter was taken up to the Hon'bie SupreiTie Coyrt. The appeai was dismissed'by the Hon'bie Supreme Court uphoiding the dedslon of "^''\ Dsepti •^ tlie Tribunaj to the effect that the Teachers/Assisfcant Teachers are entitied to regular pay scaie from the date of iniual appointment 4. in view of the above stated submissjons made by ieamed counsei for the parties, the writ petition is disposed off in the same tefims i.e. the petiuoner is granted iibeily to rnake representauon, if so advised, to considei-hls case, if he stand on the same footings as per order dated 24-08-1982 passed by the Fvladhya Pradesh State Adrninistrative Trlbunal, Jabajpur in O.A.No.2745 of 88 MauhukwU YBCSU (^upra/ and subsequentiy confirmed by order dated 03-01-1394 passed by the Hon'bie Supreme Court in S.L.P.No.6o82/1993 and grant reiief accordingiy. 5. No order asto costs. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge