513$ CGURT GE CHHA’ETiggARE AT EELAS?UR A Q Writ Pe$iti0§f¥a 192i} 0i’2UM .3E'E‘E’E‘EQNER Br. Khamhaialai Tikariha ageé 60 ($1Xgy) years S/O Ragzmaih Medica} Pracmimer ami rasident ofRaiQm‘ at Danganiya Mahadeo Gila: Road (Dr. 1Shwari Charms Shula Ward, Raipur) District Raipur (CG). VE'QSUS 1. The Mumcipai Corpora‘iima, Raipur through the Cmnnissioner Municipal Coworation, District Raipur. 2. The Nagar Niveshak Municipal COIporation, Raipui‘, District Raipui‘. 3. The Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Distrist Raipur. ‘ 4. State of Chha‘rtjsgarh through its Principal Secretai‘y, General Aéministi‘ation. Locai Bodies. Municipai Lorpmation etc Maii’iraiaya Dix Ehawan Raipur (Ch) (WRIT PniHiON UVD R AkliLLL 226 & 227 Lii TH}: LON‘l‘l U HON OF INDIA) (his. Eion hie Mr. oailsii K. Aginhotn. J.) i’resenf : Shri CR. Sahu, Ad'vocaie for the petitionei Shri Kasi‘uf uaaeei adwoaie for the respondent No i to 3 Shz‘i PK. Bhaoun, Fanei Lawyei i0: the State. EE%?OP~BEL\T§ URAL QM)E (Pas on 1" ay of Jammry, 2%9} With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up foi hearing finaiiy. 1. The petitioner, by this yetition, impugns the letter dated 11.08.01 (Annemie P/D Wheieby, the respondent No UMuincipat Lorpoiation Raipur issued a notice to the petitioner calling upon him to explain as to why he has made iiiegai construction of seven shops, without sanction or permission of the respondent corporation, and timber why the same shonid not be demolished. 2 This Contt, on 23.10.2001, granted interim reliefnot to evict the petitioner from the iand in oiisoute. 3 i\ k). ”fhe petitioner has submitted his reply to The impugned nozice on 19.08.01 (Amexure P46), which is pending consideratiorz before the I'espondent ‘cmporatjon. On account ofthe siay order granted by this couit, 110 decision could be Taken by the respoiident corporation till date. Since the petétionei‘ is questioning the title aad ownership ot‘the (iisputed land, this cannot be decided by this comt. However, in View ofthe fact that repiy to the notice is pending consideration before the respondent corporation, it is appropriate that thevrespondent corporation should take decision on repiy of the petitioner, anti pass appropriate order, in accoriiance with iawr Tiii decision is taken on reply of the petitioner, the possession of the petitioner 011 the disputed land shall not be disturbed. Observations, if any, inaoe hereinabove, shall not come in the way of decision making, in accordance with law. The petition is accordingly disposed ofwith the above stated direction. No order as to costs. Interim reliefgranted earlier stands discharged. Consequently, M(W)P No. 224/01, application for grant of interim reliet; also stanos disposed oi. . ; ‘siiish K. Agnilm‘trif ‘ Judge Sdl-