IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11569 of 2011 Girija Nand Choudhary Versus Munna Singh & Ors ----------- 02. 20.07.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed by the petitioner for setting aside the order dated 19.02.2011 passed by Addl. District Judge, Fast Track Court in civil Misc. Appeal No.22 of 2009 whereby the learned Court below allowed the Misc. case and restored the Title Suit No.38 of 2000 awarding cost of Rs.5,000/- in favour of the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that several opportunities were granted to the respondent for depositing the cost of Rs.4,000/- awarded earlier but the respondents did not comply the order. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below after considering all these aspects of the matter has taken a view and awarded sufficient cost in favour of the petitioner. It is well settled principle of law that when two views are possible and the Court 2 below has taken one view which is possible, in writ jurisdiction, this Court has no authority to substitute the another view which is also possible. I, therefore, find no reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)