’\ \ .‘x. /— APPEAL OF pHIsowER -/ r Eafh‘er"é (3U Naméi A 'v' / *a;%Sente‘nceid wg$§WEW’I‘W'V’lXmV’ 1 A§é AO to EV a§~ 0n “ £4,“ ww’ 1 “#3k i aé-A’ v under séétian3oA2"”V/wé.iwr:9?by 1:33: pvsm S.T.Nogf :gz /73‘ r‘ ‘G , It is explained‘to thé prissnar that ifr he states or Wishes to be representgd‘ by a lega'l' practitioner the Apéellate Caurt will nat prpceed‘ with the base Jfpr. seven days unless the ‘ legal practitianer appears.‘ If the legal-practitioner daes' 'noi} appear with in se’yen‘days‘ he may bie’heer‘d’rat all if the rlssner egal pract-1:§ner stetes the the :t'he‘efdoeernot gCaurt Emay proceed rwls’rrts at be ance' represented with the case by [:5 ’ lsner ‘» Willa whefshaud not be“ abligedgts appear; a‘g‘ive, a? sheeting to sany Aegalx praeté l. Date of yapplicatian' fer -Vc.s6y of Judgene nt: Nee t If 2. Date of vahich copy receivedi~ v 3 in ‘ié , , iv v 3. Eate on Ewhich Appelisent:- 4. Whether_1theA prisoneie:‘-wished;.te be ' represerjted or not ‘Y‘ef‘/M‘ 78-37%? l‘ R No. “Jill: Name (3;? QET $1 r‘WK- _ MWContinued in "PmeL mmgJail CENQQWC 107‘: :na‘eeafai :x’iol i/ 76: A We¢1§eg No.‘ . __ Fio‘rwandedwtomithe..,CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE“ at together with 3 capy 3f judgement er orde pa s‘ed 1n‘ thecase £‘or'“frj:v'aurwef stransmissianwta ,the, teeter“? n.1‘ixa;tewcou:t:.w > ‘ miwal/DisttJ \ Datefaf receiipt 1nC Jt‘Mv's Office. :J‘atesofysliecéils''t bf i . ‘1 ‘ :J‘atesofysliecéils''t ‘ Memals’fl'Ap Date‘of receiptvof Appebylliate Caurt \ 9 Wm . CVQmn?33IDQ j W VWWW131°€T§W we ‘ %3WW%W bxvxsxou‘ssNCH: . I ‘L EGN’BLE MR. L.£.EHA500 wcN'aLE MR DHIR’EEDRA M$HRA. if: 11.3; 2096 1v I Bha‘ria, Panel Lawyer for 1"ne Siam 19:31:51 Om§ judgmen‘i‘ did’a‘i’ed on _- Fer LC. Bhadeo; J ‘VBy tEi$ appeal Linda" 52 .cfion 3.74 i2) of 'fhg CrRa gauged Laxminafh ‘nés ques‘?ioned 1'he kgaiify & cérrecmess of judgmen? of éonvicfion and‘ order oi: sen?en<:e dafed 3;1.19§6 passed by ieqr‘ned 1? A§difiami Eassians Jhdga, Ja wheraby‘ ‘ieqrngd Add€fiqnai accusedfnppailan’r guii'i'y f'or ca! him Lander $ec‘ri6ns 302 5g 324 imwisonmenf for iifa and impriso m ' * Tne ’prosecu‘rion case, in fne FIE. (EXP-1) in The Poiice E1 123:2: plm. vm- The eacm +ha+ o‘n hbuseg a? 1'ha1' Time' hér mam‘ [IIT%W & Mr. ED Badguiyo, Advocm"z for! fhenppeiian‘i'. Mr. UNS Dee, Addifiaqai Pubiic Prosecu?¢r wifh Mr. MR5. gdalpur in Sesséens .riai No.182i93, Swsions Judge (afi’er' hoHing fhe nmii’fing murder- of Qangad’gi convici'ed of ‘rhe I.P.C ar§d sanfenced To underga 1men‘i‘ for 'fwo years resyac‘riveiy. aria-f; is Tim Mgbgin Bai (PW-1) ioa‘ged +a+ion Ehairémgarh oh-4.2.1993 gar abom 3.2,1QQ3 shz was i'hms'hihé paddy in The :r—in-iaw GangadeE was prewring page. ‘ XI—HCvZZ Wm ‘Accused Laxmina‘i'h. who 'is huaband of her sisfer—in-iaw; came and ldémanded page} on which her m1 ifhan ‘ ha demanded fo‘buccoyar'l w?‘ ;ciso and 'accusgd lefi' 141a hous‘e. ‘é’i arrow and she? The arrow on h bicod smrfed obzing ou1' of if. mofher-in—‘aw, which hi? on hgr ( injury. § and a‘ccused ran away. wifnessed fhe incideht brough‘f mofher—in-law ‘wasaiive. ‘Arrow was smck in *he chest of her moiher-in- lgmg. ViHqgcrs Wok hgr mo‘i’her-ihriaw +c Poiige Sm-Hcn Bhqirqmgarh from where i'hay Took her To Jagdnipur' hospimi, bu?’ oh ‘rhe way near MaWlibham 6mgadéi succumbed ¢ Receiving this .repor’r, +913 poiica regis‘fared fhekFIR (ExPil), #ke InveS'i'iga‘fing Officer lei"? for 141a scene of occurrence and ’fook in‘rd’ possession The bow una’er EXP-2. The Envesiigufing Officer gave u wrifien requesi' EXP-3T0 ihe Assisfanf Surgeon, Pr'imary Heal‘rh Ceni'i'e, Ehaimrngar'n for examina‘rion of #he §njuries of Mdhgin 3d, on which dccror examined, and prepareci +he injury vapor-f and m’enfhned iaf-r upper arm. Arrow, weapon under EXP-4 and The pe‘H'icnaf f0 The injury. fhaf -'l'here wasaggne incised wound over of offence was Token? ini'o possession of deceased $angudei was Taken info possession under Ex.P~5. Elood ‘;+eined soil and p‘ein soii was Taken info [slew )Ther-in-low gave page To \The accused, ich her mofher-in-law gave h'gm‘tobucco Thereof'rer, fine accused came wii’h bow an whien‘ hi? on her lef? upper arm and Accused aiso shof an arrow on her :heef, biood efarfed oozmg out of the , Her uncie-én-ia‘éle Dhanimm (PW-.2} the viiiagers and by fine? time, her WW w 269 3mm W am m #6:? mmmvfsa ' ,- 1' $miaa‘riWY iiW (WEAR a; 31W 311w .0 XI-HC—22 mm WE%H anémmmW ~3a ‘ was examined by ‘rhe do¢Tor on kx‘P-y and dacfor‘ opined Thuf ‘rh‘ 1be cause& by fine said arr-stir Eungudei was prepared affer V- \ I possession under Ex P—6 fron- ihe Mace of occurrence Arrow in ques'hon The reques'r of Sfa'hon House Officer ’ InJur‘y an 'rha body of Mnhgm Bun couiu Panchnumn' (EXP-10) of fhe boéy of ' $39s'rmor1'em on fhe body of deuec giving noTice‘ EXP-9 ‘ro fhe 'Famhas. Nmk and he prepared fhe pos'i moriem repori- Af're" czmpiei'icn ef inves Igmlon charge cheef was filed agams? L i'he occused/oppeiian‘i' In fhe your? 0‘ ieorned Addmonoi Chief Judicial. MagMmle: Jagdmpur, wha m Smasions Judge, Jugdqlpur frrnm J'udgz, Jagéiuipur recaived fhe cm The prosecution in order accusedlappeiiaw éxamined save; Addi‘rionai Sessions Judge recom under Sec'i'ian 3i3 of the Cr. 'appenring againsi- him in f'he pro: énnccem' and has been £aa.se§y i imp Learned Addifional 5essia aed 6angadei was conduc1'ed by Dr. SK. ‘urr camr'u‘r eu fhe hasa Tv iearnad whim immed 1“ Addi‘l’iariul LSessibn$ :2 0n fransfer for friaL to establish The‘offence ‘againsT The 1 wi‘i'nesses. On fhe wher handl iearned ied the sfafemen‘r of accused/oppe1ianf {Co in which he denied ‘fhe'9ma‘i‘erini :ecu‘i'ion evidence ana‘ si'ai'ed fha‘i' he is ico'red in The crime. 'is Judge after fearing fhe orgumen'fs of Aodi'i'ionai Public‘ Frosecui'or and counsei for fhe accused convio'red 81 seni‘enced fhe accused in The r judqmeni’ [113%W zenner as mem‘ioned in ?am 1 of fhis XI-HC—22 ‘ We have heard Mr- Badgmya A<§voca+e for accused/apyeiian‘r Mr Deo Addl‘hom! i3ubhc Frosecu'roir wrrh Mr Bha‘ha P L for fhe 51am Homicidai dau‘l'h 0f decz As far as fhe invaivem of accused'iappeilnm- in commi'i’fing fhe crime m quesfion is concérped, PW-i Mahgfn Ba; is none e!se bu? fha daughfer-in-lnw of fhe ’d‘eceas abeui‘ 11.00 c.m.*1‘herefor'e, her ate; her prese‘nce is es'mb1isin from i'he facf fha‘Fshe her-seif' receive§ The arr-ow injury on her- IefT upp r- arm. $he has stated mm accused came 1'0 her hause and dammd'ed page, which was suppiied 1'0 him by her- mofher- in-iaw, fhen he demanded Tobac o, which was uiso supplied 1‘0 him by hzr‘ mother-in-iaw and he ief‘i‘ fhe ho se. Therguf‘rer, accused came wii‘h bow & law-ow and shoi' ihe arrow'on h r, which hi? on her ief? upper arm/as a resuif bf which bioéd star-Ted oo ing cu? of H. Thén The accused sho‘i‘ fhe arrow on 6angdzi,,which hi‘r on err chest asa resuh of which The blood s'i'ar‘ied oozing oui' of if. Gangs gi was aiive, Therefore, she was Taken to *he Poiice Simian Bhair-amgarh 1' ere she lodged The report Ex.P~1; Mahgin Qai {PW-1) has aiso s‘i'a'i'ed ih 1' crime in ques‘hon was wri'nessed by Dhammm (9W-Z) who has cor. ora*ed The ewdgice of Mahgm 5m and si'aied iha‘i’ accused shoi The arr w on Gangdei which hi? on her ches'i' as a > resuh’ cf‘which she died. PW-é ’Sukhdeo has fur'i'her s'raied the? when éanqad'ei was brough'i ‘i'o Bhair mgarh she was aiive and on his enquiry d 6anguda1 Is nu-r In dispu‘ra. and chime in quas'i‘ion wns nnmmi'H'ed n1" esence in The house cannoT be doub'fed. ’ ‘ \ a e" l V - e r e b ‘ g‘ .. ......................._..............W 299’ I man WW mm§f§éfW . ammam “a XI—HC-22 lGangadei informed tha'f arrow as sh'o‘l' by Laxminafh which hi+ on her shes? Moreover i‘fhas came in f e evidence ma? accased being fhe sari-in— Jaw of deceased Gangade; borro ed paddy frem Subra‘n, husband cf PW«1 ‘Mehgm Ba! und Nicer Subran asked fhe accused to rewrn fhe same, d enraged fhe accused and fha‘r 1s why he came wi‘fh bow & arrow and ‘a: lacked Mahgin Ba; ‘5: Gangadel. Therefore; in View of fhe abcve evidence cf eyewi‘messes and om} if és , es‘fablished +ha'f fhe accused was fhe au‘rhor of injury on ieff upper arm of +ha1' fhe accused was fhe aufhor of crime and lookmg m Tne manner m which The accused £10? dead Gangadea by shoe mg an arrow on her chest vrl'al pert of 1'he orgoni which pierced befween 6m & 3”“ ribs same w re found fracfured and The dea‘fh of Gangadel was caused by syncope s a resul" of shock due 1'0 incised wound injury Ta uver and masswe bieedm we do no? fmd any iiieaah‘y or unfurmi‘w in fhe Judgment of frial courf an fhe‘re is no ground 1'0 interfere wrfh fhe judgmenf af 1’he Mai courf In fhe result fhe append being deveid ofgmerH is-I§able 1'0 be Manghm 8m and also of ‘i'he injury im‘3icTed an #he ches‘t of deceased. Accordingly, I? Is es‘mbh £59 {Lvk L %\:(§¢ . dy§rrg declarut‘on made by‘ The deceased before 'PW-é Sukhdeo, s d dismissed and accordingiy, if is di missed. ‘ Sdl- Sdl- L.C.BHADOO i Mlshra Judge i Dmrendra Judge his W