IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21978 of 2011 Somaru Ram & Anr Versus Sanjogani Devi & Ors ---------------------------------- 02. 13.12.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners who were opposite parties in the Misc. Case No. 10 of 2011 have filed this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 26.8.2011 passed by the District Judge, Aurangabad in Misc. Case No. 10 of 2011 whereby the learned court below allowed the Misc. Case and restored the Misc. Appeal No. 2 of 2000 to its original file which was dismissed for default on 8.9.2011. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the order passed by the Court below is unreasoned and without hearing the petitioners the impugned order has been passed by the court below. The misc. appeal was dismissed on 8.7.2011 and the restoration application was filed on 3.8.2011 i.e. within time. So far the passing of reasoned order is concerned, in my opinion it is not necessary that the court below is required to pass interlocutory orders by giving detail reason. It is sufficient that the application was within time and misc. case was filed for restoration of the appeal which has been allowed. So far the objection that the petitioner was not heard by the court below is concerned, The petitioners had not appeared and the counsel refused to receive the copy as has been admitted by the learned counsel before this Court. Moreover, when substantial justice has been done in favour of the party in supervisory jurisdiction the impugned order cannot be interfered with. Thus, this writ application is dismissed. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)