1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2967 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.2192 OF 2007 Rajendrakumar Basantilal Jaiswal. ...Plaintiff. Vs. Tulsiram Kannayalal Varma. ...Defendant. .... Mr. S.U. Pandey for the Plaintiff. Mr.Anil A. Jadhav for the Defendant. ..... CORAM :DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. December 6, 2007. P.C.: Counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff and the Defendant have agreed that the ad-interim order of status quo in respect of the suit property, more particularly described in Exhibit A to the Plaint shall operate as an interim order pending hearing of the suit. In view of the agreed statement made before the Court by both the Learned Counsel, the Motion is accordingly disposed of by confirming the ad-interim order dated 14th August 2007. However, it is clarified that this shall operate merely as an order between the Plaintiff and the Defendant and shall not preclude the exercise of the 2 right of any third party, including the Bank to whom the property is stated to have been mortgaged, or of MHADA. .....