-T \z^^1 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. S. N0. 5 &^ $ OF 2009 PETITIONER : Neelkanth Kaushik S/o Shri Hari Ram , aged about-24 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade- 3, R/o village- Kampa, Tahsil- Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Tribal Wefare Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector, Kabirdham, Distt. Kabirdahm (C.G.) 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kabitdham Distt. Kabirdahm (C.G.). 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bodala Distt. Kabirdahm (C.G.). 5. Block Education Officer, Bodala Distt. Kabirdahm (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS \.^ i'"y \^y' ^•<y ^ .V ^l^t 'SFt ^Job "cCT 3?T^T'3RT5F ^.>/ ^, 5) "3'ST '*ii*ii<rt<i, y>Til'(H4l<o, f®l<rtl-M^< ..^.^..:^ L3~9'^^-'3^7^_ ^, ^,^(^------^------——'---^ 3?IT^?T TT^7 (1?l^<i^) ^RTTW ^f^T 3i?lis?T S.B: HON'BLE JUSTICE MR. PRITl .27-07-2009: Shri Vipin Singh, counsei for Ku. Sunita Jain; Panei La^vy^ Counsel for the petitioner impugned order dated 2.7.2009 pa^ an aiternative remedy for filing a Therefore; he may be permltted fo ^ to fiie revision before the Director, direction may be issued to the C expedltlously. AccordJngly, the writ petition as aforesaid. in the eventualltv of fiiina si dlrected to decide the same expedit chi^id^'i 'wi^if ^f felst <F»i^i< '^3tfiFT3TT^T SNKERDIWAKER che petitioner. rfortheState. very falrly submits that against the ^sed by the Collector, the petltioner has revision before the Director Pancayat. vlthdraw the present petition with iibertv Panchayat. He however submits that a ommissloner for decldlng the revlsion •is dismissed as withdrawn wlth libertv ich revlsion, the competent authority is ousiv In accordance with law. ..s,dlowavte( v^y