IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 674 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 278 OF 2006 SHRI VISVONATA RAU VALAULICAR ....Applicant Versus SMT. MOGARE MAHABLESHWAR DESSAI ....Respondent Applicant in Person. Mr. Vivek Rodrigues, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. Date:- 11th October, 2006 P.C. Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the respondent no.18 who is the personally present before the Court and who is the main contesting party. The respondent no.18 is agreeable for disposal of this petition. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, it is made clear that the issue of limitation as well as the issue of Order 8 Rule 6A of Code of Civil Procedure is kept expreselly open. The learned Counsel for the petitioner says that petitioner is not interested to proceed with the above petition. Accordingly Rule stands discharged. DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ef.