IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.17616 of 2011 Date of Decision: September 20, 2011 Rajesh Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.S.K.Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. This writ petition is wholly misconceived. The petitioner seeks direction for the official respondents to the effect that respondent No.6 cannot be permitted to continue as an Anganwari worker since she has been elected as Sarpanch. This prayer is made on the basis of some instructions issued by the Government. The petitioner has no legal right to seek the present writ. In fact, the writ petition as framed is highly misconceived and not maintainable. Dismissed. September 20, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE