IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. W.P. No.137 of 2007 DATE OF DECISION:26.02.2007 Gulshan Kumar ..........Petitioner Versus District Magistrate (Deputy Commissioner), ..........Respondents Jhajjar & Ors. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present:- Shri Arun Luthra, Advocate for Shri N.L. Sammi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri SS Mor, Sr. DAG, Haryana. **** One Gulshan Kumar has filed this habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India alleging therein that five persons mentioned in para 3 of the petition have been illegally detained by the Brick Kiln owners-respondents No.3 and 4. Notice of motion was issued to the respondent-State and they were directed to make an inquiry from the spot. Today, ASI-Satyavir Singh is present in Court and states that he has made an inquiry and out of the five persons, only two persons, namely, Satbir and Kala Ram were found present on the Brick Klin and they made a statement to the effect that they were living on the Brick Klin on their own without any pressure and they were not illegally confined. As far as other three persons are concerned, ASI-Satyavir states that none of them were found present in the Brick Klin. In view of the aforesaid factual position, this petition is dismissed. February 26, 2007 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) pooja JUDGE