THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A.No.454 of 2002 ORDER: The appellant filed O.S.No.1040 of 2001 in the Court of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar against the respondents for the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of the suit schedule property. He has also filed I.A.No.1887 of 2001 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. After hearing the petitioner and the respondents, the trial Court dismissed the I.A., through order, dated 19.01.2002. The same is challenged in this appeal. Heard Sri V.V.N.Raju, learned counsel for the appellant. Though respondents 2 to 4 are served with notices, they have not entered appearance. The appeal arises out of an I.A. filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. The appellant no doubt has urged several contentions. The fact however remains that the suit has since been decreed. With that, the appellant has the relief of perpetual injunction. Therefore, the C.M.A. has become infructuous. The C.M.A. is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 23.07.2010 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A.No.454 of 2002 Date: 23.07.2010 JSU