IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2009 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 7199 of 2009(T) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- P.C.MURALEEDHARAN, S/O.M.K.KUTTYASANKARA MENON, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.7A, UNITY ENCLAVE, UNITY ROAD, THRISSUR CORPORATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.SUBRAMANIAM SRI.M.S.NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF THRISSUR, THRISSUR. 2. PRATHAPAN, S/O.CHAKKAMADATHIL MADHAVAN, VADANAPPPILLY VILLAGE, THRISSUR, ADDL.3. THE ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, THRISSUR CORPORATION. (ADDITIONAL 3RD RESPONDENT IS SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 17-3-2009) R1, R3 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS. SRI.T.G.LELLULAL FOR R1 SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR FOR R2 SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN FOR R2 SMT.GEETHA P.MENON FOR R2 SRI.P.M.NEELAKANDAN FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 7199 of 2009-T ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 17th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner, aggrieved by Ext.P10 has preferred Ext.P12 appeal and Ext.P13 stay petition. 2. I heard Sri.M.S.Narayanan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri. P.B.Krishnan, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent and also the learned standing counsel for respondents 1 and 3. In view of the fact that there is an application for stay, without prejudice to the contentions of the parties the writ petition is disposed of as follows: There will be a direction to the additional 3rd respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P13 in accordance with law within three weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. Till such a decision is taken there will be no disconnection. Also if the order is adverse to the petitioner there will be no disconnection for one week from the date of the order. I leave open all the contentions of the parties including the 2nd respondent's contention that Ext.P12 is not maintainable. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. MS