1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.905 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1186 OF 2009 Albina Ferro Georgy ..Appellant V/s The Municipal Corporation of Gr.Bombay & Ors. ..Respondents ---- Mr. V .R. Tripathi for the appellant. Mr.Dudhane for the respondent. Mrs.K.K.Soraan for the B.M.C. ---- Coram : R.S.MOHITE,J Date : 22.9.2009. PC 1 This is an appeal filed by the original plaintiff impugning an order dated 25.8.2009 passed by the City Civil Court refusing ad-interim relief. The Advocate for the appellant states that his client will be satisfied if he is permitted to pursue his regularisation application. It is however, seen from the documents produced by the plaintiff that after the final order under Section 351 was passed, his Architect has applied for regularisation. Some plans are said to be annexed to the application but were not produced before the Court. Another letter dated 18.9.2008 was addressed to the BMC by the Architect. Finally 3rd proposal was sent by the Architect on 7.11.2008. This last proposal was rejected on the ground that the construction is not permissible under the D.C. Rules. Since none of these 2 plans are before the Court, it was not possible to the Court to understand the nature of regularisation as sought. In my view, therefore, the ad-interim relief is rightly rejected. Appeal from Order therefore, stands rejected. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1186 OF 2009 As the main appeal is dismissed, Civil Application does not survive and stands disposed off accordingly. (R.S.MOHITE,J) 3