1 S.B. Cr. III Bail Application No. 4133/2007 (Kanna Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 25.09.2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mrs. Kausar Parveen for the petitioner. Mr. V.R.Mehta, P.P. This is third bail application filed by the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and public prosecutor for the State. While rejecting the second bail application, the petitioner was granted liberty to move a fresh bail application after the statement of injured eye witness Ram Lal is recorded. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the statement of Ram Lal has been recorded by the trial court as PW-6. I have carefully gone through the statement of Ram Lal who stated that it was the present petitioner who inflicted the injury on the head of the deceased and as per the postmortem report the cause of death is head injury which has been assigned to the present petitioner. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the witness Ram Lal reached to the place of occurrence after the occurrence took place. 2 On careful perusal of the statement of PW-6, it clearly reveals that he witnessed the occurrence and he himself is injured person. Had he reached the place of occurrence after the occurrence, there would not have been any reason for him to suffer injuries. In this view of the matter, the third bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp