IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 550 of 1988 in SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONNo 5025 of 1986 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.M.PANCHAL and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF GUJARAT Versus BALDEVBHAI M VALA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No. 550 of 1988 MS SONAL VYAS AGP for Appellants RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 MR SK JHAVERI for Respondent No. 2-5,7-12 RULE UNSERVED for Respondent No. 6,13 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.M.PANCHAL and MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA Date of decision: 21/04/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE J.M.PANCHAL) 1. Instant appeal which is filed under clause 15 of the Letters Patent is directed against ad-interim relief granted by the learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No. 5025 of 1986 on October 22, 1986. 2. The office has informed the Court that Special Civil Application No.5025 of 1986 is disposed of by the learned Single Judge (Coram: M.S. Shah, J.) vide judgment dated July 2, 1999. This information is not disputed by the learned advocate of the appellants. 3. As the main petition itself is disposed by judgment dated July 2, 1999, instant appeal which is directed against the interim relief granted in the main petition does not survive and deserves to be disposed of accordingly. 4. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal fails and is dismissed. The appeal stands disposed of as having become infructuous. There shall be no orders as to cost. (J.M. Panchal, J.) (A.M. Kapadia, J.) --- (karan)