Criminal Misc. No. M-30645 of 2008 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Criminal Misc. No. M-30645 of 2008 Date of Decision: 25.2.2009 Virender …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Tribhuvan Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Mor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for the State. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) On 25.11.2008, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has passed the following order:- “This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail for petitioner, Varinder son of Bir Singh in case FIR No. 148 dated 1.6.2007 lodged for offences under Section(s) 148, 149, 332, 353, 186, 341, 435, 307 IPC and Section 3 of the PPD Act, with Police Station Suraj Kund, District Faridabad. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has not been ascribed any injury. It has Criminal Misc. No. M-30645 of 2008 2 further been contended that the petitioner infact was present at the place of work in Okhla, Phase-III, New Delhi. In support of the argument, learned counsel has pointed towards Annexure P-1. Notice of motion for 11.12.2008. In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioner will be released on interim anticipatory bail on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer subject to the following conditions:- i) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required; ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and iii) The petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court”. Admittedly, the petitioner has caused no injury in the occurrence. Mr. Mor, on instructions from Sukhbir Singh, Assistant Sub Criminal Misc. No. M-30645 of 2008 3 Inspector, states that the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for custodial interrogation. In view of the statement made by counsel for the State and order dated 25.11.2008 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, interim pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioner is affirmed till filing of the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. On submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. petitioner shall furnish regular bail-bonds to the Court concerned. With these observations, present petition is disposed off. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge February 25, 2009 “DK”