IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.810 of 2008 DURGA SINGH ….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Rajesh Kumar Singh @ Rajesh Singh …Opposite parties ----------- 2. 18.12.2008. This revision application has been preferred against the order dated 17.6.2008 passed by Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur in Cr. Appeal No. 68 of 2008 thereby the order dated 9.5.2008 passed by Juvenile Justice Board in Jagdishpur (Goradih) P. S. Case No. 73 of 2007 has been set aside and the opposite party no. 2 has been declared as juvenile. Heard learned counsel for both the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the learned sessions judge has not properly appreciated the school leaving certificate or the report of the medical board and has wrongly declared the opposite party no. 2 as juvenile. However, on perusal of impugned order it is quite apparent that order of sessions judge is based on school leaving certificate as well as the report of the medical board apart from oral evidence. According to both the documents, the age of the opposite party no. 2 on the alleged date of occurrence was less than 18 years. In course of the argument, learned counsel for the - 2 - petitioner has not been able to show anything against genuiness of either the school leaving certificate or the report of the medical board. Under the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order. Accordingly, this application is rejected. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)