( 1 ) Cri.Appln4409-10-group IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4409 OF 2010 Shantikumar Damani and another APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4382 OF 2010 Raghvendra Laxminivas Kabra APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & another RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4411 OF 2010 Shrikant Sitaram Maniyar APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & another RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4448 OF 2010 Pundlik Namdeo Patil APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & another RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4449 OF 2010 Sunil Shivcharan Birla APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & another RESPONDENTS ( 2 ) Cri.Appln4409-10-group WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4950 OF 2010 Rajesh Ramesh Kabra APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & another RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4954 OF 2010 AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5312 OF 2010 Sarvajit Cheniram Sharma APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & another RESPONDENTS .... Mr. P.S. Mehta, advocate for the applicants in Criminal Application No. 4409/2010. Mr. G.V. Wani, advocate for the applicant in Criminal Application No. 4382/2010. Mr. V.D. Hon, advocate for the applicants in Criminal Applications No. 4411/2010, 4448/2010 and 4449/2010. Mr. V.J. Dixit, Senior Counsel, instructed by Mr. A.N. Nagargoje, advocate for the applicant in Criminal Application No. 4950/2010. Mr. V.J. Dixit, Senior Counsel, instructed by Mr. P.S. Pawar, advocate for the applicant in Criminal Applications No. 4954/2010 and 5312/2010. Mr. P.P. More, A.P.P. for the respondent/State, assisted by Mr. A.B. Kale, advocate (in Cri. Appln. No.4411/2010. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 22nd December, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.P.P. ( 3 ) Cri.Appln4409-10-group 2. As far as applicant - Sarvajit (in Cri. Appln. No. 4954/2010) is concerned, he has not yet deposited any amount though conditional order was passed on the statement of the learned counsel of the applicant. However, learned Senior Counsel submits that the applicant has made all the arrangements and has now brought demand draft of Rs. five (5) lacs for payment. The Liquidator is present in person and is ready to accept the demand draft. Learned Senior Counsel for the applicant seeks time to deposit remaining amount of Rs. fifteen (15) lacs. If the remaining amount is not deposited within two (2) weeks, the application of applicant - Sarvajit (Cri. Appln. No. 4954/2010) to be deemed as dismissed. Another application (Cri. Appln. No. 5312/2010) filed by this applicant is accordingly disposed of. 3. The remaining applicants in other Criminal Applications have deposited the amounts and as such, the ad- interim protection granted to them is confirmed. However, applicant - Rajesh Ramesh Kabra (in Cri. Appln. No. 4950/2010) shall attend the concerned Police Station on each Tuesday and Saturday between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. and shall actively participate during course of investigation. He shall produce the necessary record as and when called and shall also give ( 4 ) Cri.Appln4409-10-group proper information about the transactions which are shown in the FIR and the Audit Report. His failure to attend the Police Station or the attempt to avoid the interrogation or to mislead the I.O. may entail cancellation of bail granted to him. All the applications are accordingly disposed of. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/criapln4409-10-group