IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5024 of 2009 BETWEEN V. Rama Swamy died per LR. ... PETITIONER AND The Land Acquisition Officer, Anantapur. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. J. NARAYANA SWAMY SMT. A. CHAYA DEVI Counsel for the Respondent: --NONE APPEARED-- The Court made the following: ORDER: Petitioner is the decree holder, in O.P.No.209 of 1987, who is entitled to a claim for compensation under the Land Acquisition Act. Petitioner filed E.P.No.158 of 2008 seeking recovery of Rs.2,85,583/- and the same was allowed for a reduced amount of Rs.1,13,287/- by the Court below under order dated 31.08.2008. Hence, this revision. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner had filed a memo of calculation along with the EP and the respondent/State though had not filed any calculation memo in opposition, the Court below wrongly applied the rate of interest and reduced the amount, which is not justified. Learned counsel has also brought to my notice a decision of this Court in CRP.No.1842 of 2009 dated 30.04.2011 wherein similar order passed in connected EP was set aside by this Court and the EP was remanded for fresh consideration to the executing Court after giving opportunity to both parties to file calculation memos. 3. In the present case also, a similar order is warranted. The civil revision petition stands disposed of setting aside the impugned order to the extent of disallowing the claim of the petitioner with a direction to the executing Court to re-examine the matter after giving opportunity to both sides to file their calculation memos and pass fresh orders on the execution petition. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J October 20, 2011 DSK