CI / IH 1'HE HI(2i GOURfW TODIGATlEiB"2CT'BILASpm^iGia%I?ffi:;?^^ VKLSVSSE£LGS_'M^>t^r^_W_!2QQ^ PBTIIIOHER; 8'n Afauja, son of lat®G.D.Ahuja, aged abou-t 36 years, occupations agriculturist, resident of Rajkistaor® Nagar, Bilaspur (C.G). Vs. wWSSS»y BESPOTOBM'S 1. TTnion of India: Ihrouga Seeretary, (.,]s;SBS.S!S?g)iB^ ^8?^ -^s^"" y-,^.--'''^^ Hone BepartiBen'fc, New Delal, 2. Skate of Caiiattisgarhs 'TIirough Ghief Secret&ry, D.K.Bhawan,Baipur(C.S) 3. State of Ghh^ttisgarh, Tarou^i Secre-bary, Hoiae Beparfcaen't, D.K.Bhawan, Raipur (C.®) 4. Diree-fcor General ef PoU.ee of C'nhattisgarta'Sfeate, D.K.Bhawaa, BaipTir (C.G). .?. Inspector Seaeral of Police, Bilaspar Bange, Bilaspur (C.G). 6. ShiTraa Prasad Kallnri,Superintend6nt of Poliee, Bilaspur Bistrict,Bilaspur(CG) ?• Officer-iE-eharge of Police Station, Sarkanda', Bilaspur "(C. G). 8. Sabbasfa Agrawal, son of Fateh Ghand Agrawal,resident of Sadar Bazar, Bilaspui- (C.&). ABIICIE 226/227 6E_ISE_C©^ftEraT3:ONOF liSTHIA. M-HC-22 ^- 'yss •^MMtt, V»-AW , f^f'iwy. an^T^l. '!??fr 3)1^1 WfNi'^ftg ^. .^...S.^.M^ "^t ^ ^RTt^'^na^ 'yf?a 19.0t.2004 Shri Manoj Pararype, counsel f i^yf<ll4)i ^l^df "^ f^t<ll <^-i-SR ^; 3iPW 311^1 Shri Ronbir Singh Mtrhas V ,6civ 'r the petittoner. Advocate for the State/respondents 2 to7. of the Constitutton of India, seeklng Heard bo'th the counsel. "The petitioner has preferi^sd fhis writ petition undcr Artiele 226/227 *elief to restniin respondents 6 & 6 who tre horassin9 the petitioner and his •family members and to provide adequote protection to them, to direct the^ Officer-In-Charge of Police Station; 5arkanda, Bilaspur, to registcr the F4.R. and criminal cose ogcinst respondents 6 A 8 on the basis of Anne?<ure P-^ filed by the petitioner. It is further prayed that the Police authorities be ^lirected not to impNcat'e the petitioner in a false and frivolous case. As far os respondent t>Jo.6 tronsferred from Biltepw, thereforej is concerned, he hos already been there is no question of any apprehension. As faras question of re9isterirg of cjise is concerned, the petitioner is atways l^ at his discretion as alternative yf^ e|quolty efflcoctous remedy is awailable to the petitioner. If the Police is not r^gisterirg the case on his comploint, the petitioner can approadi 1+ie concem<|d Court ond file n complaint before the competent authority under Section 2Cp of the Cr.P.C. and the competent Court can either himself enquire into the c^mplaint os per the provisions of Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. and if the concernid Court thinks fit can send -tfte case for re9istration and investigal'ion to the| 156 (3)0f the Cr.P.C. In view o^ concwned Pottee Station under Section c^ •the d»ove circumstances, since equal /-?-,." Wl-HC-22 's'^ ''IWlcl^, a^u'is, ftx'iwy i3 wwir ai*iicb .^E^fc^.si/ 2003, 311^1^1 ft-fi'* SfI^I s^^ich yficr ..^siST' ;3'0??K2 efficocious remady is availoble to th<s the appropriate Forum. With the aboveobsei'votions tht In view of this order, M.(W.ff.Ni also stand disposed of. cbtiiT<"t^l"i ^IHcff ^ fssO lPi g.T< ^aipgtsii^F petitioner, •the petittoner con approaeh ^ petition stands disposed of. ».No.3l33/2003 nnd I.A.No.9930/2003 Sd/- L.C. ^i^f-9^ ' 'M^t