IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3585 OF 2007. APPLICATION NO.3585 OF 2007. APPLICATION NO.3585 OF 2007. IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.1969 OF 2007. APPEAL NO.1969 OF 2007. APPEAL NO.1969 OF 2007. Amar Yuvraj Dangat ... Applicant. Versus. Ichrajbai Nihalchand Kater ... Respondent. Shri Kishor Patil for the Applicant. Shri Sanjay Kshirsagar for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 01st February, 2008. : 01st February, 2008. : 01st February, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard advocate for the applicant. The impugned decree is a money decree passed in a summary suit where application for leave to defend made by the applicant was rejected. 2. Considering the nature of decree, the applicant will have to deposit the entire decretal amount as a condition for grant of stay. 3. Hence, I pass the following order: (i) Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to condition of the applicant depositing entire amount due and payable under the impugned decree with the trial Court within a period of 12 weeks from today. : 2 : 2 : 2 : (ii) If compliance is not made, interim relief will stand vacated without reference to the Court. (iii) There will be no orders as to costs. Judge. Judge. Judge.