DCRLR No.23/07 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. (Delay Condn. Appln.) Sri B.P. Nautiyal, learned counsel for the applicant/revisionists and Sri Harish Pujari, learned Addl. G.A. for the State are present. I have perused the delay condonation application supported by an affidavit and also perused the supplementary affidavit filed in support of delay condonation application. The grounds shown in the supplementary affidavit filed in support of delay condonation application are sufficient to condone the delay. The delay condonation application is allowed. Delay is condoned. I have also perused the judgment and order dated 27.9.2006 passed by Judge, Family Court, Pauri Garhwal in Misc. Criminal Case No.31 of 2006, Smt. Pushpa & another Vs. Sri Virendra Singh. Admit the revision. Sri B.P. Nautiyal, learned counsel for the revisionist has submitted that against the aforesaid judgment and order dated 27.9.2006, Respondent No.2-Virendra Singh has also filed a revision which is fixed before the Lok Adalat on 18.10.2006. Hence, he prayed that this matter may also be fixed before the Lok Adalat as there are chances of reconciliation between the parties. List this matter on 18.10.2006 before the Lok Adalat. On that day, both the parties shall appear in person before the Lok Adalat. (Dharam Veer, J.) 18.07.2008 Rajeev Dan