IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2125 of 2011 Date of Decision : February 04, 2011. Madan Lal .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.O.P.Gabba, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner retired from the post of Peon in the Municipal Council, Muktsar w.e.f. 31.7.2009 on attaining the age of superannuation. His grievance is against the non-grant of revised pay scale w.e.f. 1.1.2006 and consequential revised retiral dues to which he is entitled to. In this regard, the petitioner is said to have served the respondents with a legal notice dated 6.12.2010 (Annexure P-1) also but no response has been received so far. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to respondent Nos.2 to 4 to consider and dispose of the above-mentioned claim of the petitioner C.W.P.No .2125 of 2011 2 and release whatever is found due, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order, failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to the interest @ 6% per annum. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. February 04, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE