:1: :1: :1: HIGH HIGH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3033 PETITION NO. 3033 PETITION NO. 3033 OF OF OF 2006. 2006. 2006. Rajiv G. Mehta. ..Petitioner. Versus. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents. --- Shri. R. V. Govilkar i/b A. K. Maheshwari for the Petitioner. Shri. Vivek Kantawala for the respondent No.2. Smt. V. S. Mhaispurkar, A.G.P. for the respondent no.1. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.B.MHASE, J. S.B.MHASE, J. S.B.MHASE, J. DATE DATE DATE : MAY 3, 2006. : MAY 3, 2006. : MAY 3, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will proceed for the cross examination of the respondent no.2 from Monday, 8.5.2006. Learned counsel for the respondent states that the respondent no.2 will remain present in the court on 8.5.2006 for cross-examination. In view of this concession, the order dated 28.3.2006 passed below Exhibit-14 rejecting the cross examination is set aside. The petitioner is hereby directed to appear before the Family Court on 8.5.2006 and shall proceed with the cross examination on day-to-day basis. The respondent No.2 shall remain present in the Court on 8.5.2006, and make :2: :2: :2: himself available for the cross examination. Petitioner is directed to go on cross-examining the respondent no.2 on day-to-day basis till he finishes cross-examination. If the petitioner does not proceed with the cross examination of the respondent no.2, the right of cross examination shall stand forfieted. The family Court is hereby directed to prepone the matter for evidence and proceed with the matter. With these directions petition is disposed of. (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J.) J.) J.)