:l::'i;: c^-1^'s7 s?'iVr!a S BERS?!y a-SaiyLK BtNls^ IN THE HON'BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSl NQ^n>1^^ /2010 PETITIONER ^ iV ^•:<^y ^" ,~/^'\':'/ •"^' \'v-''' ^gS^ •-'.^"'^ ^-7' S<0 .^' RESPONDENTS ..^^'./^^3"^.,. S^9sfS^%^ ^:'CTK .1 ''^^ti ^ ^ ^Si-l - | ,^/^g^ ^ ^ &£s~£ ../'*Ea*j*?1 %.. ^^ SKSSS^ .^ <fi:l^1" ^s^' ^fci-a.m-"*'"'" Dr. Satish Kumar Agrawal S/o. Shri Ram Avtar / Agrawal, aged about : 50 years, Presently working as Professor,T.C.L. Government P.G. College, Janjgir, District : Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). VERSUS 1] ' State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, District : Raipur (C.G.) 2] ' The Commissioner, Department of Higher Education, Government of Chhattisgarh, Campus of Govt. Science College, Raipur, District : Raipur (C.G.). 3] The Principal, Thakur Chhedilal Government P.G. College, Janjgir, District : Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). II El WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA L 1 ,y .^^3 -«?:yl,A :^°" ?<.'i g WSs f^^v ',^ '^aaao' .^ -At—78 ^ y an^r w h-v* w snS^i **<i+ ^Sssss^si ^^ -*<WW^, y-flly'Ko, ^trlKHy ...LJ..P..g.2..A!«......2H.^4a Sn^?T'TO?T ( ^qE^'t^) TRiiw^toan^f SB: Hon'ble Shrl Maniadra M<»hanShrtvastava, J. 14.7.2010 cou4sel Shri Saajay Kumar, Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Heard. Subinission of learaed petitioner was graated one ad^ Policy of iacentive, ia case of t\ fixation ofhis pay iii the revisel was not added, Leamed counsel for fhe issued has been decided by passed m W.P (S) No.4486/201 Ors.). He further submits representatiou has been Hiade has not so far been decided. It is found that fhe on 20.5,2010 only. Respondeni the said representation iu In case, grievance is nc petitiouer to take recourse to s under the law. With the aforesaid disposed off. 41'ilk'lll-t ^PTCTf tf fs^S ifsK^ ii'siRman^T for the petitioner. I(awyer for fhe State, on. advance copy. lcouasel for the petitioner is fhat the taace increinent under the Govenuiient' ^iiuly plaruung. However, at fhe time of P. pay-scale, the said advauce iacreinent petitioner subniits fhat fhe aforesaid tl|ds Court vide its order dated 9.3.2010 lp5 {A.K. Keshanuani Vs. State ofC.G. 8s |±iat based on the aforesaid order, ^o respondent No.2 on 20.5.2010, which / petit|ioner has subinitted tus repicsentation No.2 inay take appropriate decision on accofdaace with law. Jt redressed, it would be open for fhe i|uch reiuedy as niay be available to liim ob^ervations, fhe petition staiids finally Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge