@7 HIGH COURT OF THE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DB: Hon’ble Sunil Kama: Sinha 8a Hon’ble R.L. Jhanwar, J,J Misc. Appeal No.1368 of 2005 APPELLANT Vishram Sahu, aged about 57 years, s/o Jharuram Sahu, R/o ViHage. Jaraod, Police Station Aarang, District Raipur (C. G). i ’ Versus RESPONDENTS 1. Santosh Kumar Sahu, S/o Sonuram Sahu (Tractor ~ Driver) Roopram Sahu, s/o Budhuram Sahu (Tractor Owner). Both the respondent no. 1 85 2 axe R/o Village Jaraod, P.S — Aarang, Distt. Raipur (0G). 3. Bajaj Alliance General Inwrance Company Ltd., through the Branch Manager, Chawhan Complex, in front of R‘ajkumar Collee: Raipur (co). i MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE E MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Appearance: Smt. Somsukla Sarkar, counsel for the appellant. ORAL ORDER (07.05.2009) l i y SU‘NIL KUMAR SINHA, J Heard on admission. /‘/, Appellant Vishram Sahu, has tiled this appeal for enhancement of amount of compensation awarded in Claim Case The following orderiol’ the Court was paasecl by g ” 2 @ M.A. N0. 1368/2005 No.97/2005 on 28.7.2005 by IX Addl. Motor Accident Claims Trib unal (ETC), Raipur. The appellant/claimant filed Claim petition u/s 166 of the Moior Vehicles Act claiming compensation of Rs.11,S0,000/— on acc 311m of personal injun'es sustained by him in the motor accident which took place on 14052003. Though it was pleaded that the appellant received grievous injiiries including fracture 1n the rib but no Doctor was examined by i Illegaiabellant to prove all these facts. The Tribunal, after through \scriitiny of the material produced before it, determined that the appiellant received only simple injuries. Therefore, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.5000/ - as the amount of compensation for the simiple injuries sustained by him in the motor accident. The Tribunal also awarded interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum . from the date of tiling of the claim petition till its reali7ation. After going through the contents of the impugned award as also the records of the claim case, we do not find any scope for enancement of amount of compensation awarded to the appellant. The appeal has no merits. The same is liable to be dismissed an is accordingly dismissed at the motion stage itself. . Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha t at h l l d ’y. Sdl- L. ihw‘r’a‘r : 7’ 3ndge ._ \ g " : am