IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 838 of 2008 With Stay Application No. 7028/2008 Sri Jitendra Singh Rawat, S/o Gambhir Singh Rawat. …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. ..…. Respondents Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. On due consideration of the submission of the learned counsel for the parties; the contents of the F.I.R and the allegations made in the F.I.R; the fact that while granting interim relief to co-accused Smt. Kaushalya Rawat vide order dated 01.10.2008 passed in WPCRL No. 780/2008, the Court observed that the allegations are mainly against the husband/the present petitioner, I do not find that the petitioner-Jitendra Singh Rawat is entitled to get the interim relief. 4. In view of above, the stay application as well as the petition is dismissed. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 22.10.2008 V.K