IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. ^^..^ 72004 PETITIONER Suresh Kumar Jogi, aged about 22 years, son of Shri Mridul Kumar Jogi, Selected Constable (G.D.) Batch N0. 314, Jashpur, resident of behind Maulvi Bandh, Namnakala Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, permanent address : village Borsi, PO Kosa, Tah. Palmgarh, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh) VBRSUS RESPONDENTS s^hLi. P. R. No, .........^J:.:^.....)............. F, c- i...<P:b.te^.<^?^/^ !^^.^,.. 3. ^The State of Chhattisgarh, through : Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, D.K.8. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Director General of Police (Admn.), Police Head Quarter, Raipur (CG) Inspector General of Police, Ambikapur, Range Surguja / Jashpur^ (CG) The Superintendent of Police, Distt. Jashpur (CG) Reservre Inspector (Police), Distt. Jashpur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/22<7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. r"'" XI-HC-22 ^TI^T^T f^ri^a^r 5^^i<=b ^\VQ^ ^^- + ^^r ^\^w^, ^Ti1^4i(o, f®i<yii^^< 3ff^T xra^? N./)^.^r^^4- —7- dS HI*1Cf(l^W^ "V^ 200 "fa^T" '3^T I^Ti^R "Hf^ 29.03.2004 Shri A..N» Bhalrta^ coi(iusel for the petitioner.. Shri Vinod Slin.va: State/respondents, Hcard. cbi^(<n<i1i 'RR^f ^ f^st <^i<^i< ^) 'srf^ww^T atava, Govt.. Advocate for the The petitioner has t1|led this petition agauist the non- consideratiou ofjoinlng re^ort on the post ofPolice Constable (Arakshak G.D.) Coi.msel fpr the petitioner submits that ttie petitioner was selected on ^he said post mid he was perniitted to joiu but subsequently hj 4 that he could not be all(| further submits that thel AiiiiexLires P/10 & P/1 ^ before respoiideiit No. 4 aiid Annexiire P/12 before resp^ndent. No. 3 mit. the same was not. considered. Couinsel for tlie petil}ioner submitted that his piirpose will be ser^ed if a dire Having considered tlj ca-se and material on red s was uifoniied by respondeut No, wed to perform his duty. Counsel petitioner made representations ?tion is given to hini to file a representation afrcsh b^fore thc respoudente aiid the respondents ma.y be dii'^cted to decide the saine within stipulated thiie/ Not. opposed. le facts aiid circuiiistaiices of the )rd, in the opinion of this Court, [^^^ •XI-HC-22 W^T^F r<H'5h :3^^ 5h^i<=h ^if^a Vcttt 5fe '^? ^|^i<nq, ^Tl1^|^(o, [c«ni^^< ^riRT ^pra? _^.:.P:..^.Q.'..€:S: 1RWCflT W^RI^ ^' 200 ^^T 'Sff^T ^<T?^R ^Tf -2- ends ofjustice woiild be s( petitioner to inake a of tlils petition before the | No. 1 aiid 2 within a period| representatiou beiug flled, decided by tlie Competent in accordorice with law as 3 months from the date 4 grievance still ^ubsists, th^ the law. Witu tlie direction af^ Consequeutly, M.~ 1247/2004 also staiid Certified copy as per| chi^(<n<I1Ti iTPraf"? 'feT^ <p3i^i< ^ '3^TH3^r ^rved if a direction is given to t.he deteil^d representation alongwith e- copy |competent authority/respondents |of 3 weeks ITOHI today aad on such Ithc saiuc shall be considcred and ^uthority/respondents No. 1 aiici 2 [em'ly as possible preferably withui [j)f receipt of representation. If the petitioner may ^.vml reniedy under |>resaid, this petition is disposed of. .W.|P. No. 482/2004 and LA. No. ^ dis^osed of. - hiles. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^ [tft^ 3tPa^ '^v