THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.10434 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard Smt.A.Chaya Devi, Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.Ranga Reddy, Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent - Corporation. At their request the Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission. The petitioner’s grievance in this Writ Petition is that respondents 1 and 2 were not taking any action on the representation given by the petitioner on 31.3.2010 and 23.4.2010 against the illegal and unauthorized construction being made by the 3rd respondent at D.No.11-248/1, Ramakrishna Nagar, Judgigari Thota, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam. The petitioner seeks a consequential direction to respondents 1 and 2 to remove the unauthorized constructions already made. The petitioner’s grievance is that the 3rd respondent is making construction without permission of the respondent – Corporation and without obtaining sanctioned plan. The petitioner would submit that, despite his representations, respondents 1 and 2 are taking no action in this regard. Sri N.Ranga Reddy, Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent – Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, would fairly state that the respondents would consider the petitioner’s representation and, if need be take action in accordance with the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, as extended to the Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, the rules, regulations and byelaws made thereunder, after putting the 3rd respondent on notice, and after giving him an opportunity of being heard. Recording the said submission of the Learned Standing Counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondents 1 and 2 to pass orders on the petitioner’s representation within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and, if need be, take action thereafter against the 3rd respondent in accordance with law. Date: 30.04.2010 ___________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J asp