IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25011 of 2011 1.Sudhir Baitha @ Sudhan Baitha, Son of Munsif Baitha. 2.Gulab Baitha, Son of Sudhan Baitha. 3.Firoz Baitha @ Firoz Safi, Son of Sudhan Baitha. All resident of village Kmohra, Bishanpur, P.S. Dumra, District Sitamarhi. 4.Munif Baitha @ Munsif Baitha, Son of Wozir Baitha. Resident of village Lagma, P.S. Dumra, District Sitamarhi. ---------- Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar. -------- Opposite Party ----------- 02/- 23/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the four petitioners apprehend their arrest, in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 141 of 2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 366 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case with allegation of kidnapping the minor sister of the informant for the purposes of marriage with petitioner no. 3, Firoz Baitha @ Firoz Safi. Submission is that after continued soft relationship, petitioner no. 3 and the victim after attaining the age of puberty have married with each other and in this regard due affidavits annexing photographs has also been filed. Further, the informant after getting correct information entered into compromise and the father of the victim is also in support of such marriage. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of the informant and the victim both appearing before the court below stating the actual state of affairs of willful marriage between the victim and petitioner no. 3 with their free will and 2 concent, without any coercion and the informant also stood as one of the bailors, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 141 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for one year or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)