IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1175 of 2011 1. DHUKHAHARAN PANDIT @ DUKHAN PANDIT, SON OF LATE SURJU PANDIT 2. BALMIKI PANDIT, SON OF DHUKHAHARAN PANDIT @ DUKHAN PANDIT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 22.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners seek their bail in connection with Ram Krishna Nagar P.S. Case No. 63 of 2010 registered under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Admittedly, petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law whereas petitioner no. 2 is brother-in-law of the deceased. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the deceased died of her ailment and her natal people were properly informed by the petitioners but subsequently, the informant, with an ulterior motive, lodged the instant case. He further submits that petitioners are separate from the husband of the deceased and moreover, the husband of the deceased has already been sent to judicial custody. In view of the aforesaid submissions as well as facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with above stated Ram Krishna Nagar P.S. Case No. 63 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )