) / 's \Aéa «‘ \Vt.hb\w\ $§§§Si§ «737333? IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. \2‘ [2011 PETITIONER / Ashish Singx‘Rajpui‘Eged about 24 years S/o— Shri C.S. Rajput, R/o— Plot No. 120, Adarsh Nagar, Kanker (C.G.) o VERSUS RESPONDENTS /1. The Statc of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretaly Employment and Training Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur The Collector, Kanker. The Superintendents Shaskiya Balak Audyogic Prishikshan Sanstha, Kanker, District— Uttar Bastar Kanker \ /$’. Mohan Yadav, Prinicipal Shaskiya Balak Audyogic Prishikshan Sanstha, Kanker, District- Uttar Bastar Kanker WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE % CONSTITUTION OF INDIA e A HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTBGARH : B§LASPUR \NRIT PETiTlON (C) NO. 417 OF 2011 (Writ Petition under Articie 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India) Single Be'nch : Hon’ble Shr’i Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ‘\, Present :— Shri Parag‘ Koteoha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Govt. Advocate forthe State. Ashok am'.ww...w.w. wwWK ORDER (ORALS (Passed on this 12‘“ day of May, 201 1) At the very outset, teamed counsel appearing for the State submits that it appears that the petitioner has made. representation‘to the Director, industrial Training lnstitute, Raipur (0G) on 30.11.2010 (Annexure P-4). if the same is pending consideration that will be decided within a period of six weeks, in accordance with law on its own merits. ln view of foregoing. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in this matter at this stage. Accordingly. the writ petition stands disposed of. / M Satish K. Agnihotri //' Sdl4 Judge H w W k PETITIONER Ashish Singh Rajput Versus RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh & Others