mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.583 OF 1990 Sardar Kamalbir Singh and others Petitioners versus M/s.C.E.Fulford (India) Pvt.Ltd. and others Respondents Mr.V.A.Thorat, Sr.Adv. i/by P.K.Vyas for petitioners. Ms.Ranjana Parikh a/w AshishJain i/by Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 18th January 2010 PC : 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that respondent no.4 is dead. She states that the petitioners were not claiming any relief against the deceased respondent no.4 in this petition and petitioners do not desire to claim any relief against the legal representatives of respondent no.4 in this petition. The statement is accepted. In view of this statement, at the risk of the petitioners, the name of respondent no.4 is permitted to be deleted. Legal consequences of deletion of name of fourth respondent will be considered at the appropriate stage. (A.S.OKA, J.) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3030 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.583 OF 1990 Sardar Kamalbir Singh and others Applicants versus M/s.C.E.Fulford (India) Pvt.Ltd. and others Respondents Mr.V.A.Thorat, Sr.Adv. i/by P.K.Vyas for applicant. Ms.Ranjana Parikh a/w AshishJain i/by Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 18th January 2010 PC : 1. Heard learned senior counsel for the applicant. The prayer in the application is that the petitioners in the writ petition be directed to amend the petition and bring the applicant on record as respondent no.4(A). Today the petitioners in the writ petition have made a statement that they do not want to proceed against the legal representatives of the deceased fourth respondent. This statement is obviously made at the risk of the petitioners. In view of this statement, this application for bringing the name of the applicant on record as legal representative of fourth respondent cannot be entertained. However, remedy of the applicant of filing appropriate proceedings will have to be kept open. ((-2-)) 2. Subject to what is observed above, the civil application is rejected. It is made clear that no adjudication has been made by this Court on the rights claimed by the applicant. All available remedies of the applicant are expressly kept open. (A.S.OKA, J.)