1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.673 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri Umesh R. Mankapure for the Petitioner. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C.: . By the impugned order, the trial Court has permitted the Plaintiff to carry out amendment to the Plaint. The order is interlocutory in nature which is capable of being challenged in an appeal which may be preferred by the Petitioner against the decree passed in the suit if the same be adverse to the Petitioner. Moreover, even if the amendment is allowed, the issue of limitation always remains open and the Petitioner can raise the said issue by filing Additional Written Statement to the amended plaint. 2. Subject to what is observed above, no case for interference is made out, at this stage. The Writ Petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA,J ash