IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 50 OF 2009 SHIVAJI R. TILVE AND 7 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. D. Lawande, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Government Advocate for the Respondents. Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for the Intervenor. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 20th April, 2009 P.C. Heard learned Senior Advocate for the Petitioners and Government Advocate Shri Rivonkar for the Respondents. 2. Learned Government Counsel states that the trucks carrying Ore are not plying between 10 p.m. to 5.00 a.m. and the Ore is being covered by tarpaulin whenever it is carried on public road. He further states that efforts are also being made to see that the Ore is not overloaded in the trucks by checking the Trucks on public road. 3. The learned Senior Advocate states that the Government has made these efforts and the monitoring should continue even in future. He further states that Sub Divisional Magistrate has issued Orders under Section 133 Cr.P.C. and also have been complied with by the Petitioners. 4. In view of this position, we find that grievance made in the Writ Petition does not survive and it is made clear that reliefs in terms of prayer clause (i) can, therefore, be given to the Petitioners. Prayer (1) is allowed in terms of the Order of the Sub Divisional Magistrate under Section 133 Cr.P.C. 5. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. arp/*