"^ '"%. pw^% j 1 ff ....<<" y Xl-HC—78 ^ ^i^i'^T ^iw TOT 3?11^??T iCTW "SiST ^ww^ ^ifl1-y<i<c, fc«ni-y^< *<iicrii «»iici»"""""v""y"""""""""""""""""""^^200 ^TI^T TT3RF ('i?^^) ^STTW Ifff^T 3^T^T Sinale Bench; Hon'Ule Mr. Justjce Dhirendra Mishra) W.Pf3N<l».73^/2009 (Petition U/A 226 of 1 Petitioner Smt. Aged Bhatal Sagarl (.CG) Vs RESPONDENTS 1. Sta cr>i<it<n<11i *ii*i<?il ^ fsl<1 <F»i^i< "^ ^tRpT STT^T •he Constitution of India) -axmi Yadu, W/o Suresh Kumar Yadu, about 39 years, Lecturer, Government Multi^urpose Higher Secondary School, ()ara, bistt. Raipur- (C.G.), R/o Ram Para Ward, Bhatapara, Distt. Raipur e of Chhattisgarh, Through, The Sec('etary Department of Education, Manjt-ralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Chh^ttisgarh Government Raipur, bistt. Raipl 3. Thel RaipJLir (C.G.) 06.2.2009 Mr. Deepak Jain, Advoc|ate for Mr. Ajay Dwivedh, by. ^jovt. Heard, birector Public Instruction, Ljr(C.G.) C>istrict Education Officer, t^istt. the petitioner. . Advocate for the State. The petitioner, who wa^ initially appointed on the post ..L of Teacher in the School Edu &overnment is aggrieved by.1 |;ation Department of the State [he action of the respondents in not adding two advanc®incr®hi®ntsin h®rsalary cvcn though .^^g ^ 1 ^. XI-HC—78 3TT^ff ^t fq^q, "TOT ^as^ sn*ilcii 7.1 "\^ ^^ '<4Ni<n'ti, ^•al^^Kc, 'f^TRI13? ' ^ , _^.^..^.£2....?.li'0.5..............._ ^^ <11<4dl *^lcb^^ ^^^^ "•^2(^ 3ii^TTRW(yii^^r) she did her B.Ed. Examinat joining on the post of Assisti Learned counsel for petitioner's case is squdrelyj in W.P. (s) No.591/200@ others Versus The State of CD this Court and this petition direction given by this Court in| The above fact has no1 for the State. In view of above, the in| a direction to the respondert-l increments to the petitioner within a period two months fro|m be subject to all verifications pleaded in the petition. No ord^r Certified copy as per ru cr)i<4i<n<i)Ti *-ii^<yjT ^f 'fe^'^T^R '^^tRmsn^r on at her own expenses before int Teacher. |he petitioner submits that the |covered by the decision of this b^ween Preetam Singh Parihar and ^hattisgarh and another decided by m|ay be disposed of in terms of the |the aforesaid matter. been disputed by learned counsel ^tant petition is disposed of with |s to make payment of two advance from the date of her appointment today. However, this order shall |nade by the State regarding facts as tp costs. ^s. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge