IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34420 of 2008 1. SHIV PRASAD @ SHIV PRASAD PATEL 2. BUNDELA PRASAD 3. LALAN PRASAD ALL SONS OF LATE BUTY PRASAD 4. RAJESH PRASAD, SON OF BUNDELA PRASAD 5. BAWLESH PRASAD 6. MOHAN PRASAD, BOTH SONS OF SHIV PRASAD 7. RATNESH PRASAD @ RATNESH, SON OF RAM SAGAR PRASAD ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE RASAUTI, P.S. KATEYA, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ. ---- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---- OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 2 1.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The order of cognizance dated 5.6.2008 passed in Kateya P.S. Case No. 28 of 2007 has been challenged on the ground that the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj has not given sufficient reason for differing with the final report submitted in this case against the petitioners. There is no doubt about the fact that the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj can differ with the findings of the Investigating Officer. In this case, I find that the Court has applied its mind and differed with the final report. I do not see any merit in this case. This application is dismissed. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)