1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 42. WP/2314/2010 (SATYAWAN NIVRUTTI @ SOPAN KOTME AND ANR V/S KASHIBAI NIVRUTTI @ SOPAN KOTME) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. S.S.Manale, Adv., for the petitioner. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:22/10/2010 1. Appointing power of attorney by the plaintiff, during ongoing litigation, is questioned by the son, the defendant, as an apprehension has been nursed by the defendant that appointing the power of attorney is certainly uncalled for. The plaintiff, being aged, bed ridden was competent to appoint an attorney. The order does not call for any interference. Needless to add, the learned Judge dealing with the matter shall be conscious to the status of the power of attorney reflecting to the facts in personal knowledge of the 2 plaintiff. Writ Petition dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/2314-10wp