IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-30243 of 2011 Date of Decision : October 04, 2011 Mohinder Kaur and others .... Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will be satisfied if respondent no.2 i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala is directed to look into representation (Annexure P-2), made by petitioners no.1 and 2 to respondent no.2 and to take action thereon in accordance with law. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, but without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners, the instant petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2 i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala to look into representation (Annexure P-2), said to have been moved to him by petitioners no.1 and 2 and to take appropriate action thereon, in accordance with law. October 04, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE