:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2086 OF 2008 M/s. Bata India Limited ..Petitioners Vs. Mrs. Mariambai Suleman and anr. ..Respondents Mr. P.S. Dani with Ms. Shruti Baid for petitioners. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B.H. B.H. B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. MARLAPALLE, J. MARLAPALLE, J. Date Date Date : : : March 31, 2008. March 31, 2008. March 31, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . T.E.R. Suit No. 132/150 of 2001 was decreed by the trial court on 2/8/2003 and the said decree was challenged in Appeal No. 166 of 2003. The said appeal has been dismissed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court on 6/12/2007. . In Writ Petition No. 4596 of 2005, I have already taken a view that the statutory remedy of revision is available against the decree of eviction, confirmed by the Appellate Court under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, Bombay Rent Control Act or under the :2: Small Causes Court Act. The order passed in Writ Petition No. 4596 of 2005 came to be challenged in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.8921 of 2007, which has been dismissed by the Apex Court on 18/5/2007. . Hence the petition is disposed as withdrawn with liberty to file Civil Revision Application. Annexures be returned, if applied for. . The decree of eviction will not be executed for two weeks so as to enable the petitioner to file the Civil Revision Application. (B.H. (B.H. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) Marlapalle,J.) Marlapalle,J.)