IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 21ST KARTHIKA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1469 of 2008(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.12472/2007 Dated 28/11/2007 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE W.P(C): ---------------------------------------------------------------- K.RAMACHANDRAN, GOVT.CONTRACTOR 'KAILAS',KALLUMKADAVU, PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.ANCHAL C.VIJAYAN RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT NO:5 IN THE W.P(C) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SRI.AJITHKUMAR, AGED AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER COMMISSIONER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT.OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI. BASANT BALAJI THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ------------------------------- CONT. CASE NO: 1469 OF 2008 ------------------------------- Dated this the 12th November, 2008. JUDGMENT As directed, the Govt. Pleader has filed a detailed statement. Annexure A is copy of the order of rejection passed by the Government on 4.4.2007. It is true that Annexure A is passed even before directions were issued by this Court. Perhaps the time when the writ petition was considered, the learned Govt. Pleader did not have full instructions in the matter. Since Annexure A is already issued by the Government, the remedy available to the petitioner is to challenge Annexure A by initiating separate proceedings. Contempt of court case will stand dropped. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE jj