BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. UO Sp OF 201d) \ /' SHANKAR LAL KAIWARTYA, PETITIONER WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I] 1] PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIOR: NE S/o Shri Bhakalu Ram Kaiwartya “0é\ aged. about 4O 'years, Re31dence of v111age Sonpuri, WW <5 \g Siksha Karmi Grade—II 999V“ Tahsil Kota, 99W District —Bi1aspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS STATE OF‘ CHHA'TTISGARH, Through— Secretary Panchyat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan , Raipur [C.G.] / 2. DIRECTORATE, Public Instruction, office of the Director Public Education, Raipur [C.G.} / 3. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER District—Bilaspur (C.G.). /4. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, Janpad Panchyat Kota, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH AT BILASPLZR WRIT PETITION 1S l No.405 of2011 PETITIONER : Shankar Lal Kaiwartya VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. Present: Shri Ashok Swamakar, Advocate fbr the petitioner. . ‘ Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 24 day of January, 2011) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner wants to make a representation before the authorities, thus, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 1t is ordered accordingly. Consequently. the writ petition is dismissed with the abovestated MM. Wait,“ i, t _ Sd/é Satish K. Agnihotri Judge observations.