® c^,^ IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl No.$J^t /2011 PETITIONER .•••y^-- <?5€ '^^•" ^ESPONDENTS Firat Lal Ratre S/o Shri Jatiram Ratre aged about 44 Years, Upper Division Teacher, presently working at govt. Middle School Katghora, Block- Katghora, District Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Deportment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Korba District Korba (C.G.) 4. Joint Director, Treasury,accounts, pension, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE y^^iw&^^ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA amit PETITIONER HIGM COURTORCHHAmSGARM : BILA^UR WRIT PETITION (8) N0. 3451 OF2011 FiiatLalRatre Versus RESPONDENTS s SteteofCNiaffiisgarh&Others ', (Writ F'^itlon uncler Artlcle 226 of the Consfitution of India) Slngte Bench : Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri.J. .^r6s@nt,;ei^,:':^^Nll'IAmttShalrna,.11/^^ Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Uiwyer for th? State. ORDER<QR^O .' ^'" :..: : „..,.,," .;.,'..;l1:: (Passed on this 01st dayof Juty, 2011) 1. Heard teamed counselforftie parties. ^,- ,.....:--' 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submtts that the petifioner is entitled to benefit of two advance increiments on aecount ef haNing t^ssed &T>1. examlnation in the year 1992 before Ns appotntment i.e. on 29.06.1993, aihis own cost.It is submitted that the i^ue tnvotved i i thepresentpetitionlsnolongerr&s^^^l^^ deacled Iby U Sui^r'n^^ C(^^jl^iaSaxeimy. SS|rfrifAfcP. & Or&*. 3. It is further submitteHd that this Court has ateo taken a simitar view tn its oreter dated 6-2-2009 pecssedln W.P.^)No^257 of 2008. Leamed counsel further submits that the order dated 29-4-2010 passed in WA.No.124 of 2CX)9, wherein relying upon thejudgment of^e Sup^ Court in Asha Saxe^ (supra) arul ^e ^rder passed by th|& Court in another W.A.No.87 of 2009, direetions have been i^ued for consideration ofthe casefor grant of two ajEh^nce increments^ t circular dated 21-9-1974 issuedby the Stete of Madh^i Pradesh, after verification ofthefacts|>leadec(inthepeUtion. 4. Leamed counsel appearing^ j^ State sytwnite ttiat ttw case of the pet|Hdper would also be considered on Uie same lines. 5. In view of the above, the» petition is dteposed of with a dlre^ion to the resppndent authonties to di^side the clairn of the petitloner for grant of two advance increments, as per the circuitar dated 21-9-1974, i^uedl by theState of Madhya Pradesh after verification ofthe facts ^leadedin ttie ? petitjon wilhina periodM8 w©?l@^mtoda^ — Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge 12009(1115MPJR(SC)S9