FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1336 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1336 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1336 OF 2008 Along with Along with Along with Civil Application No.1648 of 2008 Civil Application No.1648 of 2008 Civil Application No.1648 of 2008 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Ms.Jahanara Sarkhot i/b P,M.Havnur, for the appellant. Mr J.J.Xavuer a/w. Vinod Mahadik, for the respondent. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 22nd JANUARY, 2009 DATED: 22nd JANUARY, 2009 DATED: 22nd JANUARY, 2009 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. . This Appeal from order is directed against an order, by which the Bombay City Civil Court refused to grant interim order of injunction, as prayed in the Notice of Motion at Exhibit-3. The appellant prayed for injunction against the respondent-corporation in view of the alleged "verbal threats" given by the officers of the corporation on 17.12.2008 to demolish the suit structure. According to the appellant, the suit structure is two storeyed building, which in any case cannot be demolished overnight. Admittedly the suit building is not vacant. In my opinion, the City Civil Court, for the reasons recorded in the order, has rightly rejected the prayer for ad-interim relief. The Appeal from order is rejected. Consequently, the Civil Application stands disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)