IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 6TH MAY 2010 / 16TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14395 of 2010(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- O.M.VARGHESE, S/O. THOMAS SCARIA, AGED 35 YEARS, PERKOTTU PADINHARA MURIYIL, ELANTHUR P.O., ELANTHUR VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.O.V.MANIPRASAD RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE TAHSILDAR, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. THE MALLAPPUZHASSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PUNNACKADU P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN-689 652, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. THE SECRETARY, MALLAPPUZHASSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PUNNACKADU P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN-689 652. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.M.P.MOHAMMED FAZIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 14395 OF 2010 (Y) ===================== Dated this the 6th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner states that he is conducting a granite quarrying unit. According to him, he has a deemed licence accrued under Section 236(3) of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act for conducting the quarrying. It is stated that thereafter, he submitted Ext.P7 application to the 1st respondent for permit and that orders have not been passed on Ext.P7. It is complaining of this, the writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated, Ext.P7 application has been received by the 1st respondent, it is directed that the 1st respondent shall consider the same and pass orders thereon. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. 3. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp