IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.204 of 2010 Raju v. State of Maharashtra ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr D.R. Bhoyar, Adv for applicant Mr K.S. Dhote, APP for State Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 22nd February 2010 1. Heard submissions at the bar. Applicant is praying for grant of bail in Crime No. 347/09 registered with Police Station, Hinganghat, District Wardha for offence of murder under Section 302 IPC. 2. Learned counsel for applicant who referred to post- mortem notes, contended that death may be due to neurogenic shock. It appears that final opinion is reserved and it would be revealed after C.A. Report is received. 3. Learned APP objected grant of bail on the ground that material on record indicates ocular version of two eye witnesses who had seen the accused along with the victim scuffling with each other, giving fist and kick blows to each other and in that incident, eye witnesses had also seen that the deceased was assaulted on the portion of testicles by a kick blow. In the result, deceased fell down. According to learned APP, case has already been committed to the Court of Sessions and S.T. No. 168/09 has been registered. 4. In view of the submissions made application is presently rejected. Learned trial Court is expected to expedite disposal of sessions trial. If the trial does not begin within three months, liberty to the applicant to apply for bail afresh. Judge. hsj