IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2009 / 29TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 23897 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- N.K.JOSE, AGED 72,JALIYATH HOUSE,THABORE P.O., POTHEMKUTTY,ERNAKULAM. 683 577. BY ADV. SRI.BIJU.P.N. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KERALA DAIRY FARMERS WELFARE BOARD, PLAMOOD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DAIRY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, CIVIL STATION,KAKKANADU. 3. THE SECRETARY, (APCOS) MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, THABORE P.O.,POTHEMKUTTY,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.K.C. SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.23897 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of August, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that, he being a milk producer, is the member of the 3rd respondent. In this writ petition what the petitioner claims is that, he is eligible for pension and provident fund as per Ext.P2. It is stated that, his claim has already been recognized by Ext.P4 order passed by the 2nd respondent in pursuance to Ext.P3 judgment rendered by this court in WP(c).No.18885/06. It is stated that the matter has already been forwarded to the first respondent and that the first respondent has not take final decision in the matter. Ext.P5 representation filed by him also did not evoke any result. It is in these circumstances that this Writ Petition is filed. 2. Taking into account the above, I feel that for the present grievance of the petitioner will be redressed, if WP(c).No.23897/09 2 the Ist respondent takes a decision in the matter, in the light of Ext.P4 order passed by the 2nd respondent. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing the first respondent to consider the eligibility of the petitioner for pension as per Ext.P2 scheme and in the light of Ext.P4 passed by the 2nd respondent. A decision shall be taken as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.23897/09 3