IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3207 of 2008 GAURI SHANKAR MISHRA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 05. 12.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties. Show cause has also been filed. Under the order of the writ petition the petitioner was only entitled to consequential benefits with regard to the three punishments imposed. That is acknowledged to have been complied with, though a grievance is sought to be raised with regard to the deductions made therein of Rs. 2,000/- for which no account has been furnished, though otherwise a sum of Rs. 2,88526/- is acknowledged to have been paid. This Court is not persuaded that any consequential benefits beyond the three punishments mentioned can be pressed as a ground for flouting the order of the Court by failure of full compliance, when the consequential benefits claimed did not form part of the punishment and there was no specific order in respect thereof in the writ petition. The Court is satisfied that nothing survives for adjudication in the contempt jurisdiction. If the petitioner represents for statement of accounts with regard to the deductions made or for any other dues that may be 2 consequential to the order on the writ petition, it is expected that the respondents shall consider the same expeditiously in accordance with law and dispose it off preferably within a maximum period of two month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The application stands disposed. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)