1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.53/2011. (Gangaprasad s/o Sahebrao Tukadekar Vs. The State of Mah. and Anr.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.KC Sant, Adv. for applicant; Mr.NB Patil, APP for State. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 7 th February, 2011. ... 1) Heard. 2) The accused/applicant, while getting relieved from the employer, accepted his liability of Rs.1,76,770/-. Mr. Sant desired to produce such receipt, however, for want of communication, he could not do so. 3) Now, learned APP, based on the investigation papers, submits, this is not the only action against the accused/applicant, but he has collected advances from several agriculturists under the garb of providing seeds, he has not accounted the money and bogus receipts are issued by the accused/applicant, which according to the learned APP, warrants his custodial interrogation. 4) Mr. Sant informs, the accused is regularly causing attendance to the Investigating Officer. 5) Taking the above aspects into consideration, the interim protection dated 17.1.2011 in favour of the accused/applicant is terminated. The gravity of the volume requires interrogation of the accused in fetters. Consequently, pre-arrest bail application rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/