1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS and Registrar’s Orders. CP 204/2006 (Magan Vs. State) with CP 102/2006 (Vijay Vs. State) 1 Heard Shri Chandakant Patil, learned Advocate for the petitioners, Shri Barlinge, learned Advocate for respondent No.3 and Shri Daund, learned AGP for respondents 1 and 2. 2 Shri Barlinge, learned Advocate, on instructions makes a statement that the petitioners are permitted to join and accordingly they have resumed the services with respondent No.3 Management. Shri Patil, learned Advocate accepts this position. 3 In this view of the matter, nothing survives in the contempt petitions. Accordingly they are dismissed. Notices stand discharged. No order as to costs. Dt.26.6.2009 (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) akl