vsa 1 CP333_2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 333 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Mr. J. Shekhar & Mr. Abhishek Patil, i/b. M/s. J. Shekhar & Co. for the Petitioners Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1, 4 & 6 Mr. Chetan G. Patil for Respondent No. 5 CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 17th December, 2011 P.C.: Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners. Affidavit of Tahsildar is taken on record. The breach alleged in this Contempt Petition is of the direction issued by the Division Bench on 12th August, 2011 to the Collector to pass order regarding distribution of the amount. The Collector has passed a detailed order dated 20th September, 2011. The Collector has recorded reasons in the order of distribution. The contention raised in the Contempt Petition is that the Collector was directed to pass order in the light of the law laid down by the Apex Court and this Court, but the order is contrary to the law. vsa 2 CP333_2011 2. By passing a detailed speaking order, the Collector has substantially complied with the order of this Court. If according to the case of the Petitioner the order is not legal, it is for the Petitioner to challenge the said order in accordance with law. 3. The affidavit in reply discloses that one of the parties has already challenged the order by filing a Writ Petition. 4. Hence, no case is made out to proceed under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Contempt Petition is disposed of by keeping all the contentions of the parties on merits open. (A.S.OKA, J)