CMPMO No.226 of 2005. 2.8.2006. Present: Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. B.C. Verma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Mahesh Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. The learned District Judge while allowing the appeal of the plaintiff-respondent has relied upon the covenants in the two sale deeds dated 3rd September, 1994 and 27th December, 2000 and has come to a conclusion that these sale deeds carried a right of easement qua the lavatories both on the ground floor as well as on the first floor and without availing of this easementary right, it is impossible for the plaintiff-respondent as well as his tenant to use the flats. No interference is called for. The petition is dismissed. Looking to the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, I direct the learned trial Court to expedite the disposal of the suit. CMP No.354 of 2005. In view of the dismissal of the main petition, this application is dismissed. Interim order passed on 21st October, 2005 shall stand vacated. 2nd August, 2006. ( V.K. Gupta ), C.J. (tr)