IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13155 of 2003 ***** Syed Enayat Hussain son of Late Syed Hashan Raza, Resident of Mohalla-Chhawani, P.S.-Bettiah Town Lauriya Road, District-West Champaran (Bettiah). …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Treasury Officer, Bettiah, (West Champaran). …. …. Respondents ----------- 4. 28.1.2009. After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perusing the counter affidavit with supporting evidence brought on record specially Annexure-E, the Court came to a considered opinion that the action of the respondents is not misplaced. The basis for the deductions has a background because the petitioner has taken the advantage of commutation of pension and there is no deduction from the pension but only reconciliation of the amount paid to the petitioner based on the authorization of the Accountant General. Looking at the age of the petitioner the maximum relief which this Court is inclined, is to give an indulgence to the counsel for the petitioner, may be to sit down with the Treasury Officer, Bettiah and may be to settle the account with him with regard to the petitioner. In so far as this Court is concerned the petitioner does not make out a case for any direction. The writ application stands disposed of with the above direction. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)