IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 19TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 1192 of 2008(P) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ U. DEVADAS, UPPATH HOUSE, MALLISERIPARAMBA, SHORNUR P.O., PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.1192/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT APPLICATION DT.22.4.06. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION OF the RTA DATED 21.8.06. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT ISSUED BY THE PWD DT.31.7.06. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DT.17.11.2007. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED ON 19.11.2007. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =================== W.P.(C) NO. 1192 OF 2008 P =========================== Dated this the 8 th day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that an application for regular permit made by him vide Ext.P1 was considered by the RTA on 21/8/06 and the same was adjourned and has not been taken up thereafter. According to him, applications made subsequent to him have been considered and permits have been granted. Petitioner refers to Ext.P4 as an example to support this contention. If as stated by the petitioner subsequent applications have been granted, there is absolutely no justification for keeping Ext.P1 pending. In view of this, I dispose of this writ petition directing that if applications made subsequent to Ext.P1 have been granted, WPC 1192/08 :2 : respondents shall take up Ext.P1 for consideration and pass appropriate orders thereon without any more delay and at any rate within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp