IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(C.G.) ^ ^..-•^S.W.P. No.330-^72006 ^p>^'"^~ ^lfg^--""" ^y' Pdtffibner: Rajendra Prasad Nishad S/o Late Sri Shyam lal Nishad , aged about 41 years, R/o Village- Dudga, Tahsil- ^ Katghora, District-Korba (C.G.). Respondents: A Versus 1. State ofCKhattisgarh, through Secretary, General Administration Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur. 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, ^ <y\^ ^Korba. <0^\^^ y <\\^' 3 Collector (Tribal Welfare Dept.), Korba. O^A/r6' 4:S iii'f l>h^s ''ufflia./'8! \^^^ 4. Sub Divisional Educational Officer, Tribal y Welfare, Katghora, District Korba. 5. The State ofMadhya Pradesh, Through ^ Principle Secretary, Vallab Bhawan, Bhopal, (M.P). 6. UnionofIndia,ThroughSecretary, /Department ofPersonnel and Training, New Delhi. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 3TI^T?iT R-iifi sn^r shw<v ulsn ShWf ^ 'y 3^ '^HW^, WT^WKf, Rlc11ti^< 3li^i ^iach HWVII sriwti """""""••••"•V^ 200 3)1^1 <'WIWfli?cT 7.7.2006 Shr'i Rotdn Pusty, for the p| Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, 6ov1 Shri S.K. Beriwcl, Standing Heard. The main grievance raised father of the petitioner wos vc|l declar'ed medically unfit on 12.11.^ on •thot ground the application of was also rejected by respondent fact the petitioner's father has r^ The petitioner's father wji years, the father of the peti')|i 24.12.1992 that he had not so|j, petitioner's application for comp( ground only on 10.11.1994 and noi| elspse of 12 years. Thereforel cognizance con be taken on it anc) ground of delay and iatches. <h]<iTii«(>-i><i*iiiTftte^<Riwi< i?a:lR|iT3TI^T fetitioner'. |. Adv. for the State on advsance copy. Counsel for Union of India on advance copy. by the petitioner in this petition is that the rtarily retired on 24.12.1992., as he was 992 on account of mentally unsoundness and the petitioner for compassionote appointment 1^0.2 vide order dated 10.11.1994, whereas, in ^t sou9ht any votuntary retir-ement, |as retired on 24.12.1992 and since last 14 i'oner has not challenged the order dated voluntary retjfement. Morepver, the issionate appointment was rejected on that kf the petitioner' has filed this petition after the petition is hopeiessly belated cnd no accordingly, the petition is dismissed on the Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (<)^y^r) '^ ")'