IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 1038 of 2006 Rajnish Sharma & others ……… Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ………. Respondents Mr. S.S. Yadav, Advocate for the applicants Mr. Nandan Arya, AGA for the State/respondent nos. 1 & 2. JUDGMENT Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. From Annexure No. 5 to the Application, being the First Information Report dated 28th September, 2006, it is clear that the private respondent filed the First Information Report on 28th September, 2006 with the Women Police Cell, Almora. Women Police Cell, Almora, finding that the action complained of in the First Information Report was committed within the local limits of the police station Mukerian, District Hoshiyarpur, transmitted the said First Information Report to police station Mukerian, District Hoshiyarpur. It appears that the said police station thereupon registered a First Information Report on 6th December, 2006, but gave the date of the First Information Report as 28th September, 2006. While the investigation pursuant to the First Information Report is being conducted at Hoshiyarpur, private respondent was not in the know as to whether any progress has been made on the said First Information Report. She, accordingly, filed a complaint. 2. In a situation of that nature, the matter must be dealt with in accordance with Section 210 of the Code. Applicants have not brought on record any other document to suggest what progress, if any, has been made pursuant to the said First Information Report. It is, therefore, the duty of the applicants to bring the same to the notice of the learned Magistrate so that he can discharge his duties pursuant to Section 210 of the Code in relation thereto. The matter is accordingly disposed of. It shall be open to the applicants or any of them to approach the Magistrate and apprise him of the facts of this case appropriately. (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 23.03.2011 Aswal 2