IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11979 of 2007 NIRANJAN PRASAD DAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 19.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel respondent Bank. Besides the other ingredient of law which has been raised by learned counsel for the petitioner and the so called resistance to the writ application by the Bank, there is categorical statement made in the counter affidavit that the respondent Bank is willing to settle the matter on the basis of the certificate amount which has been raised against the petitioner for which his tractor has also been seized. It will be both in the interest of the petitioner and the Bank to sit together on a table and resolve their dispute between themselves. The petitioner may convey his feeling to the Bank and the Bank will also consider his claim within a reasonable time frame. Let the tractor in question be released in favour of the petitioner as a good gesture. This writ application is disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)