IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2255 of 2011 Decided on: April 27, 2011. Seema ….Petitioner Versus The State of H.P .and ors. ….Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. K.S. Banyal, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A.G. for the respondents No. 1 to 3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): The petitioner in this petition is aggrieved since she has been replaced by the private respondent. The petitioner is PTA appointee and the private respondent is regular appointee. According to the petitioner, she can work only in the place/school where she was appointed, whereas the private respondent, being regular appointee, can work in any open vacancy. In case the petitioner can point out any suitable vacancy, where the private respondent is willing to be accommodated, the petitioner may point out the same before the second respondent along with willingness letter, in which case, the second respondent will take appropriate action within another one month. In case the petitioner is otherwise eligible, she may be continued in the resultant vacancy till she is otherwise replaced by a regular recruitee. 2 2. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Ahuja), April 27, 2011 Judge (pankaj)