r-t^ V. ?"^^ :::v¥S^: [0- ^ ^e-- c 00 L^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. ^)3 7 2011^ PETITIONER Uday Singh S/o Shri Samliya Singh Aged about 47 years, Occupation - Assistant Teacher Govt. Primary School Taraleem Berla, Bemetara Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS // 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur (C.G1) ,3. District Education Officer District Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ .\\ y sn^i^? K;-<i.dl SV^f ?tl^i ^Q^ ^\ '5^ •^l-Mlcl^, STi1<H'ie, I°<Ml-My NIHWI IKfffeK C^^s'-^] il ••fp( '200 f^re^sr' sn^i TTgiw ^rfta SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohari 10-01-2011 Shri Vipin Tiwari, counset for Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer Heard. the integra and the same has been flnal in the case of Asha Saxena vs. SU 59. order dated 06-02-2009 passed in W| for Ifte petitioner further draws 4 have been issued for consideratioit chl<4[^l<ft'T •RIH<?lt^ 'f^ldl ^f<-^l< ^? aiPtpT 3n^r Shrivastava. •I. petitioner. 'or the State/respondents. Learned counsel appearing fc|r the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to benefrt of two advan<te increments on account of he having passed B.Ed examination before fiis appointment at his own cost. It is submitted that the issue involved i]n the present petition is no longer res ^ decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court te ofM.P. & Ors.. 2009 fHI) MPJR fSC) it is further submitted that thisl Court has also taken a similar view in its f.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned counsel Ittention of this Court to orcter dated 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal hfo.124 of 2009, wherein relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in tl|ie case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this Court in ano<her Writ Appeal No.87/2009, direetions of the case for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated.21109-1974 issued by ttie State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification ofthe fact^ pleaded in the petition. Learned counsei for the respohdents submits that case ofthe petitioner would also be considered on the satAe iines. In view of the statement made above, this petition is flnally disposed off with a directaon to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the ciaim Xfec-22 Q^- ?ST -i||i)|d.l|, HiTflyil;,, fs)!11'Mlj,< HWVII aiiich 3T^?r "cnra? ...^e.fe).^.^'^ IN^ST' an^i^; R-ti.oi' sn^i shw"e ^iftti +l^I^f4)'i ^WciT "^ f^(<^ ^I^K ^; aifSaq aii^r of the petitioner for grant of two a^vance increments as per cireular dated 21-09-1974 issued by the State of fl ladhya Pradesh, after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition within a jieriod of eight weeks from today. Deepii Manindra Moban Shrivaatava Judge !w