IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. R. No.3109 of 2009 Date of Decision:11.3.2010 Smt. Deepa Chopra .... Petitioner Versus Sh. Madhu Sunam Gupta and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. G.C. Shahpuri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vimal Kumar Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Sanjeev Sura, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. This revision petition has been filed against the order dated 10.11.2009 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhari whereby the defence of the petitioner for leading evidence has been closed by court order. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 states that he has no objection if one more opportunity is granted to the petitioner to lead evidence. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No.1, order dated 10.11.2009 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhari is set aside and the petitioner is granted another opportunity to lead evidence in defence. Three effective hearings shall be granted to the petitioner to lead the said evidence. However, the said evidence shall be concluded within 2 months. Accordingly, the present revision petition is allowed with the above directions subject to payment of Rs.3000/- as costs. 11.3.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE