^ .....-•-' 5 -.6.--"" '^1: ^sSf^ n^--'' ^es6'-;' ^V:.y" 48^-"1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) S!SSFa! WRIT PETITION N0. ^ ^3 OF 2006 @1!^U GENCH PETITIONERS ^\ <r'; •rf^N •'^ *6.i-> 'v; r'ti-*1 1. Shakeshpear Kujur, Son of Shri •^ Alois Kujur, aged about 35 years, Working as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Girls Higher Secondary School, Rajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). 2. Smt. Jermina Minj, Wife of Shri '' Shakespear Kujur, aged about 31 •*:, j ^ ... . . .. —.. . .^ J~" ^^ years, Working as Upper Division "' } / - . - <^<^ Teacher, Pahadi Korwa Kanya ^-^ \.o ^ y\ <a- y1^ RESPONDENTS Shiksha Parisar Rajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Tribal Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Collector, Ambikapur, District , Surguja (C.G.). 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). -Tft^ 4. The District Education Officer, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 5. The Block Education Officer, ^Ti^. Rajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). E y*:- ^,i>3KsiK^^^^;^'^iffi,,^;s£3.--^i,l,;^a^i^^^^^| s. ^^•^y'''^^. 'sv M K ww. w/- w E~" FTK % |GS |2|: l^ M INS ISOS 18SB B w& 81 sw SK ^ rfis B Ire1IIK Sffi B a-i 1 IW \sss '% 3E m ?0? lOh |£3f 1 1@6 l3>! K l(i@»w IB-3 |Z|s !TO G3I -n? TOi -i; n; ETI; i 1"0; 1 :<&1 s. VSK 1% K 1% w Bi f 1 113s^ 8$|£ a; ni 'S'O; ^ssis-ESS^'sRS^iawaas^Kt'aKs.i-Mi'fai'st1,^^.,!;.,:?» HfRH COIJRT OP CHHA'ITISOARH AT BITASPTJR PETmONER iM-L/_C,lRV WMT PETITION No. 1639 of2006 Shakesnear Kiiiiir & Aao&or. —f^ VKRSIJS ; ; State ofChhattiseam& C'Whers. WRTTPETITION UNE^ERA&ITCLE 226/227 OF IuE CONSTITUTION OF TMTiTA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satisfa K. Agnihotri, J. Presert: Shri V.K.Paridev, Advocate tbrthe netitioners. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, panel Lawyer for tfac Slate/respoDdenls. ^ 1 4- - (Passed oa 08tn day ofNovember, 2011) Leamed coimsel aooearine for tfce Stat.e subnuts that the netitioHers have ah'eadv continued at the orianal olace of Do^ins for more thaa 5% veara on account of interim order granted bv this Coiirt 17.04.2006 The State mav be eranted iibertv f.o oass a.nDTOoria.te ordere keeoms in view nitblic ini.erest. and admttustrative exigeacv. Shri BhaAiri fiirther subinits that the Stete shall not insist uoon comoliance ol the imnuaied order da.ted and 31.08.2005 (Anaexi.ire P/l) in respect ofthe petitioaer. At tliis stage, whe" no effect could be givea to the hBpiigned order dated 31.08,2005 (Aimexiire P/l) on a.ccount ofthe interim order dafed 17.04.2006, tlius, it is not iiecessary to go int.o legality' and validitv oftlie aiorestMed imsiigned order. 3. Ia view ofthe above, accordme to leamed counsel aooearine for the petitioner. nothing surv-ives in this oetition for adiudication. 4. Accordiiislv. the Deti'tios sfands disoosed of No order asfo costs. ^sss. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge II T- \A •^ S&^isSsseKi-i-f^si w^s^^'y: .1 -LL.