IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. No.M-9556 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 31.3.2010 Budhi ......Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY. PRESENT: Mr.B.S.Tewatia, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** ORDER Crl.Misc.No. 17123 of 2010 is allowed as prayed for. Crl.Misc. No.M-9556 of 2010 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.313 dated 30.10.2009 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC registered at Police Station Sector 55, Faridabad. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that there are no specific allegations against the petitioner and he is not involved in the case in any manner and even he was not present at the spot. I have heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and have also gone through the contents of the FIR as well as order of ASJ, Faridabad dated 19.3.2010 vide which the application for grant of interim bail has been declined. As per case of the prosecution, all the accused, including the present petitioner, executed a sale deed dated 27.3.2009 in Calcutta on the Crl.Misc. No.M-9556 of 2010 [2] basis of forged Power of Attorney and by impersonating Smt. Jamuna Devi, the real owner of the land. Keeping n view the seriousness of the allegations and the role of the petitioner, no case is made out to grant anticipatory bail and the petition is dismissed. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 31.3. 2010. raghav