IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 14898 of 2000 Between: The Fishermen Coop. society Lachagudem , Chintakani (M) , Khammam Dist. rep by its President G.Muthaiah s/o Ramakotaiah ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt. of A.P rep by Prl. Secretary Animal Husbandary & Fisheries , (Fish-II) Secretariat , Hyderabad 2 The District Collector Khammam Dist. 3 The Asst. Director of Fisheries , Khammam 4 Lingaboina Venkaiah S/o Chandraiah, aged 55 years, 5. Pittala Venkaiah S/o Mangaiah, aged 59 years, 6. Madipalli Guravaiah S/o Tirupathaiah, aged 50 years, 7. Pittala Viswanatham S/o Venkaiah, aged 40 years, 8. Madipalli Pullaiah, S/o Veeraiah, aged 37 years, 9. Lingaboina Chandra Rao S/o Venkaiah, aged 30 years, 10. Madipalli Chinna Venkaiah S/o Veeraih, aged 29 years, 11. Boina Venkatappaiah S/o Sadaiah, aged 38 years, 12. Gudugu Venkati S/o Appaiah, aged 27 years, 13. Gudugu Sreenu S/o Balaiah, aged 35 years, 14. Panditi Venkata Narayana S/o Pitchaiah, aged 35 years, 15. Bolla Venkateshwarlu S/o Buchaiah, aged 50 years, 16. Madipalli Chinna Pullaiah, S/o Guruvaiah,aged 31 years, 17. Pittala Mangapathi S/o Venkaiah, aged 35 years, (Respondents 4 to 17 are all Fishermmen by occupation and are R/o Lachagudem (v) Chinthakani (M) Khamma District. (R-4 to R-17 are impleaded as per the Court orders dt.10.08.201 in WPMP No.10067 of 2001) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ or direction preferably Writ of mandamus declaring the impugned order issued by 2nd respondent in Rc.No.H1/464/2000 dt. 27-7-00 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the proceedings issued by same respondent in proceedings Dis. No. B6/9368/97 dt. 26-3-99. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: G.P. for Animal Husbandry Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 17: Mr.D.Goverdhana Chary. The Court made the following : ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition to pursue the pending dispute before the Government at the instance of the petitioner alone with regard to exact water spread area. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to pursue the remedy pending before the Government. No costs. __________________ V. ESWARAIAH, J Dated:16-03-2005 Ccm To 1 The Prl. Secretary, Animal Husbandary & Fisheries ,(Fish-II), Govt. of A.P. Secretariat , Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector Khammam Dist. 3 The Asst. Director of Fisheries , Khammam 4 Two CCs to the G.P. for Animal Husbandry, High Court Buildings, A.P.Hyderbad(OUT). 5 Two CD copies.