IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 22244 of 2010 Date of decision: 27.09.2010 Mrs. Sonia Sharma ........ Petitioner Versus State of U T Chandigarh .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Ravi Parkash, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Gautam Kaile, Advocate for Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) It is stated by the learned counsel of the petitioner that the petitioner who is married sister-in-law of the complainant, is residing at Agra. Mr. Gautam Kaile, Advocate, on instructions from ASI Kulwir Kaur, states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation. In view of the above, the order dated 04.08.2010 passed by this Court is made absolute. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 27.09.2010 mohan