1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2333/2007 {Smt. Javitri & Others Versus Additional District Judge & Others} Date of Order :: 23rd July, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. Sukhveer Singh for the petitioners BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The plaintiff – respondents filed a suit for permanent injunction in respect of disputed property alongwith an application for temporary injunction which was allowed by the trial court. The trial court recorded a finding in respect of prima-facie case, irreparable injury and balance of convenience in favour of the plaintiff and passed an injunction order. Being aggrieved with the same, an appeal was preferred by the defendants but without success. Hence this writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the defendants. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners contended that both the courts below have committed an illegality in granting 2 the main relief prayed in the suit itself at the time of injunction application, therefore, the impugned orders are liable to be set-aside. 4. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners in the light of reasons assigned by both the courts below while granting injunction in favour of the plaintiff-respondents and after considering the same I am satisfied, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, that courts below have rightly granted injunction in favour of the plaintiff-respondents. There is a concurrent finding in respect of prima-facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury in favour of the plaintiff-respondents, which does not call for any interference by this Court. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK