IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38628 of 2008 SMT. KUNWAR & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 15.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is in custody since 15.07.2008, in relation to Marhowraha P.S. Case No. 192 of 2007 for offence under section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that though initially First Information Report was lodged against the petitioners alleging demand of dowry and the reason for death of the daughter-in-law. But it has come during the course of investigation and also supported by a large number of villagers that it was a case of accidental death not death for dowry as alleged. Petitioners have also brought a compromise petition which has been filed by the informant in the court below as Annexure – 2 and the public petition contained in Annexure – 3 in this regard. There is also some evidence in the order of the learned Sessions Judge, that even in the supervision, prima facie the stand taken by the counsel for the petitioners seems to be borne out. In that circumstance, let the petitioners namely Smt. Kunwar and Dinesh Manjhi, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) - 2 - with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chapra at Saran in connection with Marhowraha P.S. Case No. 192 of 2007. Rajeev/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)