IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34099 of 2011 ====================================================== Rupesh Yadav @ Rukesh Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== 2 13-10-2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 384, 386 and 387/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of taking away brick and other articles of the considerable value from the site of the government scheme and demand of extortion of Rs. 10 lacs. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the Rojgar Sewak of the Panchayat and he has been dragged in this case because his brother Pintu Yadav has criminal antecedent and due to the criminal activities of his brother he has also been involved in other cases. It is further submitted that the informant has retracted from his initial version and has filed a petition to that effect before the learned court below which has been brought on record, as Annexure-2. The other co-accused who has been put on trial has been acquitted which also gets reflected from the impugned order. Considering the fact that the other accused persons have been acquitted and the informant has retracted from his initial version, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Basnahi P.S. Case No. 48/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra Kumar/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)