IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8845 OF 2010 Between: N.Biksham Reddy and others. … PETITIONERS And The State of A.P. and another. …RESPONDENTS This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.8845 OF 2010 ORDER: This Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioners seeking to quash the proceedings in S.C.No.351 of 2010 on the file of M.S.J Cyberabad-cum-I Additional District Judge, L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy, for the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC. 2. Today, the matter is posted for hearing. The petitioners and respondent No.2-complainant appeared before this Court and respondent No.2 filed an affidavit expressed her willingness to compromise the issue. Both the parties filed identity cards in proof their identity. The learned Public Prosecutor also accepted the same. The affidavit runs as follows: “I Smt Narayana Satyawathi W/o Biksham Reddy, 57 years, H.No.2-99/1, Sainagar, Chaithanyapuri, Ranga Reddy District, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and sincerely state on oath as follows: I know the facts of the case and as I am the victim and de facto complainant as such I know the following facts before this Hon’ble Court. I submit I am the deponent and the de facto complainant in Crime No.173 of 2010 on the file of Saroornagar P.S. as I have lodged complaint on 5-2- 2010 and the same was renumbered as S.C.No.351 on the file of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad-cum-I Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, L.B.Nagar. I have lodged complaint against my husband and others where incident occurred on 3-2-2010 who were petitioners herein to the present proceedings herein. I submit that I have lodged one more complaint previously against my husband under Section 98A IPC and the same is running at the XI M.M.Court, Cyberabad. Now with the elders of the both sides and to protect the dignity of our family as we are having here children all are married and my children are staying at U.S.A. I submit that I along with the elders intervention and agreed to withdraw all the cases civil and criminal wherever pending between us as such my children also withdrawn the cases pending before the R.D.O. Miryalaguda and Senior Civil Judge Court, Miryalaguda, in continuation. Now I am intending to withdraw the above case as per the compromise before the caste elders. The above facts mentioned above paras are true and correct and declare that the facts stated above are true and correct and the best of my knowledge and belief without any coercion and force”. 3. By way of above affidavit, respondent No.2-complainant has stated that she is not intending to proceed further against the petitioners herein, in view of compromise entered into between the parties, and therefore, she wants to settle the matter. 4. The learned Public Prosecutor also reported no objection for the same. 5. Taking into consideration the affidavit filed by respondent No.2- complainant, all further proceedings in S.C.No.351 of 2010 on the file of M.S.J.Cyberabad-cum-I Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, L.B.Nagar, are hereby quashed. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. _________________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO AUGUST 31, 2010 YVL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.6593 OF 2010 July 09, 2010