FAO No.2620 of 1996 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.2620 of 1996 DATE OF DECISION: December 24, 2010 CHHANO AND OTHERS ...APPELLANTS VERSUS DALBIR SINGH AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN. 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement. No 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? No 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the digest? No ---- PRESENT: NONE FOR THE APPELLANT. MR. SUNIL SAHARAN, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1. MR. KUNAL GARG, AAG, HARYANA. K.KANNAN, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is for enhancement of compensation for the death of a 40 years old person, who was an agricultural labourer in an accident that had occurred in an accident on 6.10.1992. The claimants were widow, two minor sons, two daughters and an aged mother. Since the scales of compensation and parameters for its determination are reasonably well settled, I will not find an occasion to dismiss it for default, but I proceed to examine the case on its merits with the assistance from the counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. The evidence was given by widow Chhano, who said that she had, at the time of evidence, daughter aged 20 years, yet another daughter aged 17 years, and sons were aged 15 and 13. She also gave evidence that FAO No.2620 of 1996 -2- the deceased was a blacksmith and used to earn `3500/- to `4000/- per month. The Tribunal took income as `1500/- per month on the ground that even a labourer gets `1500/- per month. A Blacksmith is a semi-skilled labourer and I will provide a little more of what could be taken as an unskilled person and take the income to be `2500/- per month and take the contribution to the family at `2000/- per month. The yearly contribution would be `24000/-. I will adopt a multiplier of 15 and take the compensation at `3,60,000/-. I will add another `15000/- towards the conventional heads of claim for loss of consortium and loss of love and affection for the children, besides funeral expenses and loss of estate. The Tribunal has determined a compensation at `1,92,000/- and the amount in excess over what has been already determined by the Tribunal shall attract interest @ 6% from the date of petition till the date of payment. 3. The liability amongst the respondents shall be in the manner determined by the Tribunal. The increased compensation shall fall to be divided amongst the widow and children equally. 4. The appeal is allowed to the above extent. December 24, 2010 (K.KANNAN) Gulati JUDGE