IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2011 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32517 of 2011(L) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. ANDREENA JOSEPH, CHERUTHURUTHY HOUSE, AYROOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 579. 2. NIRMAL VAKACHAN, THAKKOLKARAN HOUSE, ASHTAMICHIRA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 731. BY ADVS. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SRI.MAHESH V.MENON RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, TENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676 505. 2. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, TENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676 505. BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC., UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 32517/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DT.29-11-2011. P1(A):COPY OF APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DT.29-08-2011. P2: COPY OF CHALLAN REMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER FOR THE PRESCRIBED FEE OF RE-VALUATION DT.23-08-2011. P2(a):COPY OF CHALLAN REMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER FOR THE PRESCRIBED FEE OF RE-VALUATION DT.29-08-2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 32517 of 2011 L ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 7th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioners submit that they appeared for B.Tech 8th semester examination and failed in some papers. They submitted Exts.P1 and P1(a) applications for revaluation and filed this writ petition seeking an order for expeditious revaluation and declaration of their results. 2. I heard standing counsel appearing for the University also. 3. Having regard to the facts pointed out, it is directed that the University shall complete the revaluation sought for and declare the result of the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, provided the applications have been received and are otherwise in order. W.P.(C) No.32517/2011 : 2 : 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the University for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/07/12 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge