IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 30TH OCTOBER 2008 / 8TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 31860 of 2008(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- KURIAN C.KURIAN, AGED 22, FLAT NO.2 REAL VILLA, MAHAKAVI G ROAD, KOCHI - 682 011. BY ADV. SMT.AYSHA YOUSEFF SMT.MOLLY JACOB SMT.RABIA BEEGAM T.K. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, CALICUT UNIVERSITY. 2. CALICUT UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. BY SC SRI P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).31860/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 30th day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner has completed his B.Tech Course from the Government Engineering College, Thrissur, affiliated to the Calicut University. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained in one paper, in the 7th Semester Examination, he had applied for revaluation. He is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the 7th Semester B.Tech Examination. His application for revaluation is pending before the first respondent. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioner in relation to the 7th Semester B.Tech Examination, as early as W.P.(C).31860/2008 2 possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs