IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.893 of 2005 APPEAL NO.893 of 2005 APPEAL NO.893 of 2005 IN IN IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1678 OF 2004 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1678 OF 2004 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1678 OF 2004 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 453 OF 2003 EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 453 OF 2003 EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 453 OF 2003 IN IN IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1393 2001 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1393 2001 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1393 2001 In In In SUIT NO.1341 OF 1998 SUIT NO.1341 OF 1998 SUIT NO.1341 OF 1998 Jetu Jacques Taru Lalvani .. Appellant versus Shreeji Mineral Waters P.Ltd .. Respondents 2 to 4. and Ashok Mishrimal Parmar & ors .. Respondent nos.5 to 8 ... Mr.N.K.Mudnaney for the appellant. Ms.S.P.Trivedi for the respondent no.1 CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND D.G. KARNIK, JJ D.G. KARNIK, JJ D.G. KARNIK, JJ DATED : 18th November 2005. DATED : 18th November 2005. DATED : 18th November 2005. P.C.: Heard. 2. It is agreed by the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent no.1 that it be clarified that by the impugned order dated 19th July 2005, attachment levied in respect of the property being tenanted room no.403, 4th floor of Shree Maroo Bhavan, New Hanuman Lane, Mumbai, continues and that by the said order, the attachment in respect of the said property has not been raised. We order accordingly. 2. As regards the order concerning raising the attachment of movable properties referred to in Exhibit-I attached to the Chamber Summons, we are satisfied that the impugned order does not call for any interference. 3. Appeal is disposed of accordingly. (R.M. LODHA, J) (R.M. LODHA, J) (R.M. LODHA, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J)