IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39510 of 2008 MEENA DEVI, wife of late Mishrilal Mahto, resident of village-Bheriahi, Ward No.18, P.S.-Parsa, Distt.-Parsa, Nepal Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 16-03-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Search and seizure have been doubted on the point of non- compliance of provision under Section 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act. It is submitted that seizure list contained recovery from co-accused only and a liberal view may be taken on the point of being petitioner’s lady. After going through the FIR itself it is clear enough that there was no need of any search, rather four bags were there in possession of both the ladies accused including this petitioner containing 15 Kgs. of Charas in 30 packets. Recovery of such quantity of Charas does not entitle the petitioner for any relief in the name of female. Accordingly, this petition is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial of Sonbarsa P.S.Case No.44 of 2008. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )