IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No. 4901 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: December 13, 2011 Rajender Parsad .. Appellant Vs. Rajbir .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the appellant. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) CM No. 14279-C of 2011 Heard. For the reasons as mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and delay in filing the appeal is condoned. RSA No. 4901 of 2011 (O&M) The plaintiff- appellant (herein referred as, 'the plaintiff') filed a suit for specific performance of the contract with consequential relief of permanent injunction which was decreed by the trial court vide judgment and decree dated 22.12.2008. Aggrieved by the said judgment, the defendant- respondent (herein referred as, 'the defendant') preferred an appeal which was partly allowed for an alternative relief, consequently decree for recovery of `1,50,000/- along with interest @ 6% per annum w.e.f. 13.6.2003 till realization was passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant. Having examined the judgment passed by the first appellate court, the same appears to be well reasoned and well founded, calling no interference by this Court. No substantial question of law arises for consideration. Dismissed. December 13, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge