‘ @ HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILA$PUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.4710 OF 2008 PETITIONER Smt. Nanda Meshram, W/o Shri Anil Meshram, aged about 45 years, Upper Division Teacher, Nehru Ward No.12. Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Thraugh the Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). Director, Public instructionc, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Disirict Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. The Principal, Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS iii With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the V petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits, at this stage. However, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the concerned authorities within a period of three days and the same may be directed to be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within the prescribed time. 3) Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that if the representation is made, the same shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the ~77; ‘ representation. r», (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. oRAL oRDER (Passed on this 27‘“ day of August, 2008) 4) Learned counsel for the State further submits that no coercive steps shail be taken against the petitioner, tiii the disposal of the representation. 5) i hope and trust that the State Government shall examine the representation objectively in accordance with law and guidelines, issued by the Government time to time. 6) ln View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 7) Consequently, l.A.No.1, for grant of ad-interim writ also stands disposed of. Sdl— Judge Satish K. Agnihotri Gowri