1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4155 OF 2006 Meghna Miradarshan Co-operative Housing Society Limited & Another .....Petitioners. V/s Additional Commissioner, Konkan Division and Others .....Respondents. ---- Shri M. P. S. Rao with Shri Simil Purohit with Shri H.K. Sudhakara i/b M/s. Khaitan & Co. for the petitioners. Shri Pradip Patil, A.G.P for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 6. Shri Y.S. Jahagirdar, Senior Advocate with Shri T.D. Deshmukh for the respondent No.3. Shri P.S. Dani for the respondent No.4. Shri R.S. Apte for the respondent No.5. ---- CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & V. M. KANADE, JJ. DATE : 14 th September, 2006 P.C.: 1. The learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 states that the authority will re-consider the appeal filed by the petitioners in accordance with provisions of law and, after hearing the concerned parties, will pass an appropriate order within a period of six weeks from today. 2 2. Parties to appear before the Additional Commissioner - Respondent No.1 on 26/09/2006 at 11.00 A.M for further proceedings in the said appeal. The Lower Appellate Authority should bear in mind that while disposing the appeal, it has to specifically take into consideration issues to which the provisions of ULC Act apply as well as the material to which the provisions of MOFA apply and accordingly pass an appropriate reasoned order. Parties shall place their necessary arguments and submissions on record while observing necessary precision in their arguments so that authority can properly apply its mind to all the material on record and the provisions of law which are applicable within the jurisdiction of the concerned authority. 3. Petition is accordingly disposed of with the above directions while accepting the statement made by the learned A.G.P on behalf of respondent Nos. 1. (R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. ) 3 (V. M. KANADE, J.)