IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 623-M of 2008 Date of Order : 11.02.2008 Ajit son of Dalbir Balmiki ..... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. Baldev Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Chand Ramwilla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Ghanghas, DAG, Haryana RAJESH BINDAL J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations against the petitioner under Section 306 IPC are not made out even from plain reading of the FIR. There is no abetment to commit suicide. The suicide note on record neither bear any date nor signature of the deceased. Even the story that the suicide note was torn by the co-accused Parmod is totally unbelievable. It is further submitted that the co-accused Parmod, whose name is mentioned in the FIR, has already been granted bail by the trial Court. Learned counsel for the State objects to the grant of bail to the petitioner stating that it was only on account of harassment by the petitioner that daughter of the complainant committed suicide. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perusing the FIR wherein allegations are that the petitioner along with Parmod were having affair with the deceased and there was some exchange of letters and on account of harassment, the deceased committed suicide. Crl. M. Petiton No. 623-M of 2008 --2-- Be that as it may, without opining on the merits of the case, it is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtak. Petition stands disposed of. ( RAJESH BINDAL ) JUDGE February 11, 2008 dinesh