1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3584 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3584 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3584 OF 2006 Popatlal Chamanji Jain & Others ..... Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra ....... Respondent. None appears for the Applicants Mr. U.V. Nikam, APP for the Respondent. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : 5TH DECEMBER 2006 DATE : 5TH DECEMBER 2006 DATE : 5TH DECEMBER 2006 P.C. 1) Advocate appointed for espousing the cause of Applicants is absent. The learned APP on the instructions of concerned Officer of Thane Central Jail states that the Applicants are being regularly produced before the learned 2nd Adhoc Additional District Judge, Thane on various dates which are fixed by the said Court. Learned APP states that the concerned Officer has brought the record showing that the Applicants are being taken to the Court regularly. The statement made by the learned APP on the instructions of concerned Officer is accepted. In view of the said statement, no further directions are required to be issued. Hence, the Application is disposed of accordingly. 2 (A.S. OKA, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)