IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5679 of 2010 LALITESH KUMAR LALIT, S/o – Raj Nandan Sharma, resident of village – Cheriya, P.S. – Bhargwanpur, District – Begusarai. ------------------- Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------------ Opposite Party. ------- 03. 28.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is named accused in connection with Begusarai SC/ST P.S. Case No. 260/2008 for offences under Sections 504, 341, 376, 511, 379, 3(1)(X)/ 3(1)(XI)/ 3(1)(XII) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Petitioner carries allegation of committing misbehaves with the complainant in order to making unsuccessful bid to commit rape upon her. He also has abused by naming her caste, but, at the same time fardbeyan lacks mentioning caste of the accused, which is mandatory, in view of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Gorige Pentaiah V. State of A.P. & Ors. reported in 2009 Criminal Law Journal, 350. It appears that there is land dispute between the parties. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest/surrender within four weeks from receipt of the copy of this order, petitioner, namely, Lalitesh Kumar Lalit, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) - 2 - with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Begusarai SC/ST P.S. Case No. 260/2008. Subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to attend to court at least for one year or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, on failure on two consecutive dates, privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)