IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 3118 of 2001 BETWEEN: B. Soma Rao, (Hindu) S/o. Late B. Sailoo, R/o. 14/EX.TTT (Municipal No.6-2-498/5) New Boiguda, Secunderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Vice Chairman and Housing Commissioner, Andhra Pradesh Housing Board, Hyderabad. 2 The Executive Engineer (Housing), South Division, Andhra Pradesh Housing Board, M.J. Road, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, Order or direction, one more in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing Respondents herein to register the sale deed in respect of property bearing House NO.14 Ex.TTT(Municipal No.6-2-498/5) situated at Old Boiguda, Secunderabad constructed by the 1st respondent herein, in favour of the Petitioner herein and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.D.MADHAVA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: MS. G. SUDHA SC FOR APHB The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter was taken up for hearing on 19.04.2008, as none appeared, it was adjourned to 30.04.2008. Thereafter, when the matter was taken up for hearing on 07.08.2008, as none appeared for the petitioner, it was directed to be listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Today when the matter is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’ and taken up for hearing, neither the petitioner appears nor there is any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for default of the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J August 14, 2008 DSK