IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2010 / 21ST JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 18114 of 2010(L) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ CHINNAMA SCARIA, KURAKUNNEL HOUSE, KATTAPPANA. BY ADVS. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR, SMT.G.CHITRA RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,IDUKKI. R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/06/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO.18114 OF 2010 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the holder of a regular permit conducting services on the Kaloor - Kumily route. The route has a distance of 180 kms. According to the petitioner, most of his passengers are direct travellers. Therefore, they are put to undue difficulty and inconvenience because there is doubling of two portions of his route. The petitioner has therefore submitted Ext.P1 application for variation of the condition of his permit. He complains that no orders have been passed thereon, till date. The learned Government Pleader has no objection to a direction being issued to consider Ext.P1. 2. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the request of the petitioner for variation, evidenced herein by Ext.P1, in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE lgk