1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9426 OF 2004 Ratnakar Gujar .. Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra& Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Uday Warunjikar for petitioner Ms.J.S.Pawar, A.G.P. for State. CORAM : A.P.SHAH AND S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATE : 15TH DECEMBER 2004. DATE : 15TH DECEMBER 2004. DATE : 15TH DECEMBER 2004. P.C. . Heard Mr.Warunjikar, learned Counsel appearing for petitioner and Ms.Pawar, A.G.P. for respondents. 2. Facts of this case are similar to the 2 facts in Writ Petition No.1726 of 2000 (Arvind Dnyaneshwar Mali & Anr. Vs. The Chief Officer & Ors. dated April 28, 2000). We are inclined to pass similar order in this case. 3. The State Government is directed to decide the proposal made by the Zilla Parishad for regularisation of the service of petitioner as expeditiously as possible and in any event within three months from today. 4. Liberty to petitioner to file a fresh petition in case the order of the State Government is adverse to petitioner. Pending the consideration of the proposal for regularisation and for a period of four weeks after commnication of the decision of the State Government, services of petitioner not to be terminated. 5. Petition is accordingly disposed of. *****