IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.584 of 2009 M/S JAI GURUDEO ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROP. SACHIN KUMAR @ PRINCE KUMAR, S/O MANNA SINGH, R/O MOH-NEW AREA, BEHIND J.K. HOTEL, P.S. AURANGABAD (T), DISTRICT- AURANGABAD. -APPELLANT Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AURNAGABAD. 2. THE D.D.C. CUM EXECUTIVE OFFICER, JILA PARISAD, DISTT. AURANGABAD. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SADAR, AURANGABAD. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AURANGABAD, BIHAR. 5. THE OPFFICER IN CHARGE, TOWN P.S. AT AURANGABAD. 6. ARUN KUMAR SINGH, S/O SARYU PRASAD SINGH OF VILLAGE-MUKUND, P.S. BARUN, DISTT- AURANGABAD. -RESPONENTS 2 05.05.2009 Petitioner approached this Court stating that by order dated 14.3.2009, Subdivisional Officer, Sadar, Aurangabad, directed to remove the illegal occupants from the shop settled by the Zila Parishad to certain settlees. It is the contention of the petitioner that he took possession of the shop from respondent no.6, who was the original lessee and, according to him, the Subdivisional Officer, has no power to cancel the lease and pass the impugned order but without notice to him, canceling his lease. The respondent no.6 has 2 not approached this Court for cancellation of his lease. Learned Judge noticed that even if respondent no.6 is lessee he has no power to sub-lease. The Zila Parishad has no congenial relation with the petitioner. We are of the view that none of the contention raised in the appeal can be raised in the writ petition. We fully agree with the views of the learned single Judge. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed. (J.B. Koshy, CJ.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) AAhmad