IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 24502 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: October 7, 2010. Mahabir Singh ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) Present: Mr. Baldev Singh, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Sudhir Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dhruv Dayal, D.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.229 dated 14.04.2010, under Sections 419/420/467/468/471/120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Central Faridabad, District Faridabad. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been continuing in custody since 12.07.2010. Further contends that CRM No.M-24502 of 2010 case is triable by Magistrate and the same is not likely to be decided in near future as even charge has not been framed so far. Further contends that only allegation against the petitioner-accused is that he had obtained voucher for amount of tax deducted at source by Haryana Urban Development Authority regarding his father Prem Singh in his name after death of his father. Further contends that the money received has already been distributed amongst all the legal heirs of Prem Singh including complainant. Learned counsel for the State has not disputed these facts. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Mahabir Singh is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Faridabad. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) October 7, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2