CHHATTISGARH W.P. (S) No. >3€33 (2009 / / Smt. Kamlesh, W/o. Shri A. Khan, aged about 53 years, working as Asstt. Teacher, Kanya Ashram Mutanpal, Block ~ Bastanar, Tashil — Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) PETITIONER §\5g\§wv\ VERSUS RESPONDENTS / ('1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through SecretaJy, Department of sbhool Exammiation, Mantralay, D.K.S._ Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /-(2) The Director, Directorate of C.G. Public Education Department’ Rajpur (C.G.) /(3J The District Education Officer, Office of District Education Officer, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) / (4) I The Commissioner, Tribal Development Raipur (C.G’) Mata Rukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, thr. Its Secretary, Mata Rukamani Sewa Saiisthah Samiti, Dimrapal Tahsil 8a Distt. Jagdalpur (C.G.} WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The Petitioner named above most respecoully submitted as under: - 1. M PARTICULAR OF THE PETITIONERS As shown in the cause title. / HIGH COUR! OF CHHATTISGAEH ; BILASPUR WRIT PETITION IS! NO.5791 OF 2009 Smt. Kamlesh Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ pétition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. PETITIONER RESPQNDENTS Present: - Shri P. S. Koshy. counsel for the petitioner. Shri P. K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER'IQRALI (Passed on this 08 day of October, 2009) 1. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finally. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Smt. A. Lall v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others‘, thus the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to decide her wse in the light of afore-stated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No.5 Institute is a Government aided school and the petitioner is a teacher within the sanctioned strength. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same wilt be considered and decided, in accordance with law. within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. W 4. in view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for L “ U * the petitioner, nothing survives inthis petition for adjudication. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of./ , ‘ r sdl— . Satish K- Agn‘hom ‘ i Judge nkvwu . . r' i i Tumane w ‘ 2007 (1) BLJ 265 /