IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4 of 2008 S.P. THAKUR & ORS . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. **** 9 11.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party-University submits that the order has been complied with and necessary payments have been made to the concerned petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that firstly, although the petitioners have received the payment as remitted by the University, however the amount remitted is not correct, secondly the claims which were not found admissible the petitioners were not informed and thirdly that some on the amount which were recoverable from the petitioner nos. 10 & 14 has been recovered from other petitioners. Therefore, in the above circumstances, it is submitted that the whole calculation of the University does not appear to be correct. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party-University submits that since the order has been complied with this application need not proceed further. Considering the submissions of the parties, I find - 2 - that since the representation of the petitioner claiming their dues have been considered and the amount found payable by the University has been paid which is not in dispute this application need not proceed further. However as submitted by the petitioner that the whole calculation is not correct, in this view of the matter, it will be open for the petitioners to raise their grievances before the appropriate forum as per law. This contempt application stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)