THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.89 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioners filed W.P.No.28206 of 2008 claiming benefit under G.O.Ms.No.68, dated 08.04.2005. The writ petition was disposed of on 01.04.2009 directing that in case the petitioners stand on the same footing as those covered by G.O.Ms.No.211, dated 29.10.2008, they shall be extended the benefit under G.O.Ms.No.68, dated 08.04.2005. The verification in this regard was directed to be completed within the a stipulated time. This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents have not implemented the directions issued by this Court. Respondent Nos.2 and 4 filed separate counter-affidavits. It is stated that after verification of the claim made by the petitioners, Memo, dated 02.12.2009, was issued by respondent No.2. The copies of further proceedings are also enclosed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Irrigation. The direction issued by this Court to the respondents was to verify the claim of the petitioners and extend the benefit under G.O.Ms.No.68, dated 08.04.2005 in case they stand on the same footing as those covered by G.O.Ms.No.211, dated 29.10.2008. In case the petitioners are aggrieved by the Memo, dated 02.12.2009, they have to prosecute the remedies separately. The respondents cannot be said to have committed contempt of Court. Hence, the contempt case is closed. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:21.06.2011 kdl