1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4271 OF 2009 Shrirang s/o Kondiba Done & others .. PETITIONERS VERSUS Saheb s/o Laxmanrao Sadavarte & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.G. Dargad, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Naik, Advocate for respondent no.1. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 7th APRIL, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Petitioners herein / original defendants are raising exception to the order passed by the District Judge – 3, Parbhani on 6-5-2009 thereby the appeal presented by the respondents / original plaintiff bearing Misc. Appeal 14/2009 came to be allowed and the order of injunction has been clamped against the petitioners / original defendants. 2 It is not necessary to go into the factual aspects of the matter. Suffice it to note that the order of injunction passed by the first appellate court is 2 operating since 6-5-2009. The suit presented by the plaintiff is for securing decree of declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction. Suit appears to be pending since 2008. In this situation, it would be desirable to direct the trial court to dispose of the pending suit as expeditiously as possible preferably by the end of December 2010. No interference is called for in the instant petition in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition therefore stands dismissed summarily. 3 In view of dismissal of petition, pending civil application, if any, stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp4271.09.odt