Civil Revision No.4127 of 2011(O & M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:11.07.2011 Group Captain Onkarjit Singh Malhi ....petitioner Versus Rajesh Bhalla .....respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Balraj Singh Rathee, Advocate for the petitioner *** RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J.(ORAL): This is landlord's revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for issuing directions to the Rent Controller, Amritsar, to decide the eviction petition filed by him expeditiously and preferably in a time bound frame. The instant petition was filed by the petitioner on 10.05.2010. Admittedly, the provisional rent has already been assessed vide order dated 25.11.2010 and thereafter the evidence has been led. In fact, it has been admitted before this Court that the petitioner has already led his evidence and now respondent-tenant is leading the evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also shown to this Court a certified copy of order dated 27.05.2011 which shows that on that date the respondent-tenant had tendered into evidence his affidavit as examination- in-chief and his cross-examination has been deferred because of the request of the counsel for the petitioner. In this view of the matter, since the Rent Controller is Civil Revision No.4127 of 2011(O & M) 2 already proceeding with the case. No directions are required, at this stage. Dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 11.07.2011 neenu