1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2374 OF 2006 A.R. Choudhary & Others .. Petitioners. Versus Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation & Another .. Respondents. Ms.Sangita Musale i/by Mr.V.J. Hegde for the petitioners. Mr.Prakash Shinde i/by M/s.M. Dhruva & Co. for respondent No.2. Ms.Reshma J. Nathani & Mrs.Deepa Chavan i/by N. Vora & Associates for respondent No.1. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. J.P. DEVADHAR, J. DATED : 6th February, 2008 DATED : 6th February, 2008 DATED : 6th February, 2008 P.C. : 1. During the pendency of this writ petition, the petitioners and respondent No.2 have settled their dispute amicably. Consented terms have been filed before this Court on 23-01-2008, which for the purposes of identification marked ‘X’. 2. We had required the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 to examine the consented terms. She prays for further time to seek instructions. We see no justification to adjourn the matter. However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as respondent No.2 states 2 that there is no clause in the consented terms, which would directly or indirectly bind the respondent No.1. Thus, the consented terms would in no way prejudice the rights of respondent No.1 in any manner whatsoever. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of as per consent terms, which shall form part of this order. Undertakings made by the parties are accepted. 4. The writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE J.P. DEVADHAR, J.