IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1201 of 2009 ANAMIKA SRIVASTAVA @ DEEPA SINHA, WIFE OF SRI MANISH KUMAR SINHA, RESIDENTOF MOHALLA- TUTBARI, KAMTA BHAWAN, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT- GAYA, DAUGHTER OF SRI DEEN DAYAL SRIVASTAVA, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT HIGHDAL COLONY HATA, P.O. & P.S. HATA,DISTRICT-KUSHINBAGAR (U.P.) -PETITIONER Versus SRI MANISH KUMAR SINHA, SON OF LATE NARENDRA KUMAR SINHA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA :TUTBARI, KAMATA BHAWAN, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT-GAYA. -OPPOSITE PARTY ------- For the Petitioner : M/s K.C.K. Sinha, Manoj Kr. Sinha, Anirudh Kr. Singh For Opposite Party : M/s Nagesh Pratap singh, & Prashant Sinha 2 22.01.2010 After some argument Mr. K.C.K. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this Civil Revision in view of the provision as contained in Section 19(5) of the Family Court Act, 1984 and its interpretation by a Division Bench of this Court in Jagdish Prasad Chouhan V. Bhuneshwar Chouhan & Anr., 2009 (3) PLJR 931, holding that forum of Civil Revision would not be available against any interim / interlocutory orders passed by Family Court. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw this Civil Revision to avail any other remedy if available under law. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party raises no objection. In that view of the matter, this Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) AAhmad