1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1299 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 3386 OF 2002 Sukumar Estates Ltd. ...Plaintiff. vs. Swaran Kaur Jaisingh Chaddha & Ors. ....Defendants. ----- Ms. Naseem Patrawala i/b M/s Pravin Mehta And Mithi & Co., for the Plaintiff. Mr. D.H. Mehta i/b D.M. Legal Associates, for Defendant Nos.2 and 4 to 6. ----- CORAM : A. A. SAYED, J. DATE : 18TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C. : 1. The above Chamber Summons is taken out by the Plaintiff for bringing the heirs of deceased Defendant No.3 on record. 2. Mr. Mehta, the learned counsel for the Defendant Nos.2, 4 to 2 6 opposes the Chamber summons. However, there is no reply to the Chamber Summons filed by the Defendants represented by Mr. Mehta. 3. In the circumstances, for the reasons stated in the affidavit-in- support, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c). Amendments to be carried out within a period of four weeks from today. Plaintiff is directed to serve amended copy of the plaint upon the Defendants. 4. Additional written statement, if any, be filed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of amended copy of the plaint. 5. The Chamber Summons stands disposed of. ( A. A. SAYED, J.)