IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2542 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.2542 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.2542 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1470 OF 2005 SUIT NO. 1470 OF 2005 SUIT NO. 1470 OF 2005 Hirachand H. Vora ....Plaintiffs. vs. MTZ Industries Ltd ....Defendants. NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2543 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.2543 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.2543 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1471 OF 2005 SUIT NO. 1471 OF 2005 SUIT NO. 1471 OF 2005 Kalpesh H. Vora ....Plaintiffs. vs. MTZ Industries Ltd ....Defendants. Ms. Neeta Solanki i/by.Kiran Jain and Co. for the plaintiffs. Ms. Agnes Bareda i/by. Thakore Jariwala and Associates for the defendants. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. NOVEMBER NOVEMBER NOVEMBER 13, 2006. 13, 2006. 13, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. It appears that on the date on which the ex-parte decree was passed the reference before the BIFR in respect of the defendant was pending. Hence both the Notice of Motions are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). sd/- (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J)