IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6837 of 2011 OM PRAKASH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --------- 02/ 06.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner is said to be the main assailant along with two other co-accused persons. It would appear from perusal of the report of List and Computer section of this court that having similar allegation prayer for bail of one co-accused Manoj Singh has already been rejected by another bench of this court vide order dated 3.9.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 32205/2010. Although learned counsel for petitioner submits that perusal of the case diary is essential before passing final order but I am not at all in agreement with his submission because there are sufficient materials available in the impugned order of the learned Sessions Judge for disposing of the prayer for bail of the petitioner. It would further appear from record that case was instituted in the year 2005 and the petitioner was arrested by the police on 4.9.2010. So, the aforesaid ground is also sufficient to reject the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Although learned counsel for the petitioner points out that charge sheet has been submitted in this case against the petitioner in the year 2010 but the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner does not make any difference. In the aforesaid circumstances, prayer for bail of the - 2 - petitioner in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case no. 108/2005 stands rejected. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)