CWP(T) No. 8763 of 2008 09.11.2010 Present: Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents/State. From the record it is apparent that decision conveyed by the Government to the Director of Education in terms of letter dated 23.3.1999 (Annexure A-2) has not been reviewed by the Government. As long as this decision is not reviewed Director of Education has to implement the same. In terms of this decision petitioner is inter-alia entitled to benefits of pay scale payable to T.G.T. (Sanskrit). 2. It is contended by Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, learned Dy. Advocate General that the decision only deals with monetary benefits and not grant of T.G.T. status to the petitioner. That may not be true. From the letter itself it is apparent that on the basis of qualification which he had acquired from an institute outside the State petitioner was claiming not only pecuniary benefits but also status of T.G.T. (Sanskrit). As long as decision is not reviewed it has to be implemented. 3. In this background, it is open for the State to reconsider the matter and take a fresh decision by taking into account subsequent developments which have taken place and more specifically contents of letters dated 11.8.2000 (Annexure A-Y) and 29.8.2000 (Annexure A-Z). Decision be positively taken within -2- a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order failing which there is direction that letter dated 23.3.1999 be implemented in letter and spirit. 4. With the aforesaid observations the present petition stands disposed of. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. November 9, 2010 (PK)