IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2009 / 9TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 17116 of 2009(O) -------------------------- EA.400/2008 of I ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM OPELE.6/2005 of PRL.M.C.,ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- N.RAVINDRAN PILLAI, S/O. NARAYANAN THAMPI, POORATHIL THEKKETHIL, VATTEKUNNAM, EDAPPALLY NORTH P.O. BY ADVS. MR.K.JAGADEESACHANDRAN NAIR, SMT.DIVYA C. BALAN, MR.JAISHANKAR V.NAIR, MR.P.K.RAKESH KUMAR. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. GOPAKUMAR RAJAN, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. HARI DHATHAN, PURATHIL PUTHEN VEEDU, VATTEKUNNAM, EDAPPALLY NORTH P.O., KOCHI. 2. RAJAGOPALAN, S/O. AYYAPPAN NAIR, LAKSHMI VILASOM, VATTEKUNNAM, EDAPPALLY NORTH P.O. R1 BY MR.K.RAMAKUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE, MR.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI, MR.PREM NAVAZ J.R. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 17116 OF 2009 O ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 30th day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to his right to challenge the order impugned by way of revision under section 115 CPC. The petitioner has already filed a revision against the impugned order. Reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge the impugned order by way of revision, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE) aks