1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4702 OF 2008 ( Narayan Ganpat Chopade vs. Additional Commissioner & Ors. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DECEMBER 16, 2008. Heard Shri Kuthe, learned counsel for the petitioner, AGP for respondents No. 1 to 3 and Shri Thengre, learned counsel for respondents No. 4 & 5. The contention of Shri Kuthe, learned counsel is that the document at Annexure – 7 i.e. registration of reserved plots shows allotment of two plots to the petitioner in 1975-76. He contends that that document has been tampered with and it has been shown as prepared in 2003 by mentioning present petitioner as encroacher. The document at Annexure 7 (page 29) does not show that it was prepared in 1975-76. Similarly, pleadings in relation to this document as contained in Writ Petition in para 7, as shown by Shri Kuthe, learned counsel also does not support his arguments. The facts reveal that the petitioner admitted that he was encroacher and because of that further action has been taken. This issue was 2 specifically raised by the petitioner for the first time before the Deputy Collector and Special Land Acquisition Officer and said authority has found that the issue was not raised earlier. In spite of this specific observation, the petitioner is not in a position to show to this Court that he was not encroacher and he was placed in possession of two plots by some Government orders. The story about allotment of two plots to same person also cannot be accepted. I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is dismissed accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.