1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 32. CA/8773/2008 In FAST/15124/2008 --------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. J.S.Gavhane, AGP for the applicant. ... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 2nd July, 2009 ... P.C.:- 1. Heard learned A.G.P. There is delay of 1863 days in causing to file the appeal. The State felt that the contractor did not comply his part of the obligation and, consequently, prosecuted him by recovery proceedings and, since there was no evidence, the learned Judge dismissed the suit of the State. The grounds seeking to condone the delay are that the proposal was sent to the Law and Judiciary Department which sanctioned the same on 5.12.2007. The office of the Government Pleader received the same date and it was assigned to the learned A.G.P. On the same date. However, there was communication gap and the 2 appeal could not be filed. The delay is not properly explained. Application rejected with appeal. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/ca8773-08