- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.839 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.839 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.839 OF 2005 Ashwinbhai T. Sheth and others ...Petitioners vs. Maxco Plast and another ...Respondents AND AND AND CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.840 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.840 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.840 OF 2005 Ashwinbhai T. Sheth and others ...Petitioners vs. Thakker Associates and another ...Respondents Mr.S.V.Marwadi for the Petitioners Mr.P.P.Kunwal for Respondent No.1 Mr.Rajesh More, A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 16,2006. : OCTOBER 16,2006. : OCTOBER 16,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates appearing for the Petitioners and the Respondents. My attention has been invited to the order dated 22nd February 2006 passed by this Court which records that the parties have settled the dispute and a joint application will be made by the parties under section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 2. The Advocates for the parties state that both the parties were given copies of the order dated 22nd February 2006 and thereafter they have not reported further progress. 3. In view of what is stated in order dated 22nd February - 2 - 2006, it is not necessary to keep these Petitions pending. In case the offence is not compounded, liberty can be granted to the Petitioner to prefer a fresh Petition in this Court. 4. Writ Petitions are disposed of with liberty to file fresh Petitions in the event the offence is not compounded. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE