1 WP No.1889/10 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1889 of 2010 Dattatraya Sarjerao Suryavanshi ... Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents ... Mr.P.B. Kakade for the petitioner. Mr.P.P. Kakade for respondent nos.1 to 3. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND N.D.DESHPANDE, JJ DATED : 25th August 2010 P.C. 1. By this petition, petitioner challenges the order passed by the Scrutiny Committee holding that the claim of the petitioner that he belongs to Mahadeo Koli Schedule Tribe is not valid. Affidavit has been filed on behalf on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2. In that affidavit in paragraph no.5, respondents have stated thus: “5. I say that the petitioner submitted his application dated 21st July 2009 stating that he wants to withdraw 2 WP No.1889/10 his tribe claim. I say that on 22.7.209, the petitioner was present before the Committee for hearing. I say that at the time of hearing, on 22.7.2009, the petitioner has contended that he has not received the vigilance cell report and therefore the same was again served to the petitioner which was refused by the petitioner. I say that the petitioner has submitted that he has given letter of withdrawal of his tribe claim. Hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit”4” is the copy of the Roznama.” 2. They also produced the copy of the roznama dated 28th July 2009. The petitioner has filed rejoinder but in the rejoinder, learned counsel for the petitioner is not able to show anything about what is contained in paragraph no.5. The petitioner has withdrawn his claim as “Mahadev Koli Schedule Tribe. In our opinion, he cannot maintain this petition. Petition is rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J) (N.D.DESHPANDE,J)