IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2008 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 8947 of 2008(M) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ ANNIE JOSEPH, VETTUVELIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KUMMANNOOR MURI, KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.ALEX N.MATHEW (KOLLAM) SRI.H.RAMANAN SRI.JAMES JOSE RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. ARUVAPPULAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ARUVAPPULAM P.O., KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. OMBUDSMAN FOR LOCAL SELF GOVT. INSTITUTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY MR.C.B. SREEKUMAR, STNAIDNG COUNSEL FOR PANCHAYATH BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.J. MOHAMMED ANZAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(c).No. 8947 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to quash certain wrong entries in the road register maintained by the Panchayath. In fact the petitioner approached the Ombudsman for Local Self Government Institutions and the Ombudsman noticed that civil case was pending and as per Ext.P10 order dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner. 2. Heard Sri. H. Ramanan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. C.B.Sreekumar, learned counsel for the first respondent, who has taken notice. Mr.Ramanan submitted that as on date of Ext.P10, no civil suit was pending. But the learned counsel conceded that as of now, an appeal has been preferred against the decision of the suit. Appeal is a continuation of the suit and the learned Ombudsman in my opinion was justified in directing the parties to await the civil court's final verdict. Declining the prayers, the writ petition is dismissed. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE ks.