1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. MCA No. 690 of 2011 in Writ Petition No. 5881 of 2010 Sau Vatsala v. CEO and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr S.S. Patil, Advocate for applicant Mr S.Y. Deopujari, APP for respdt no. 3 Coram: B. P. Dharmadhikari & A. P. Bhangale, JJ Dated: 16th August 2011 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner. For reasons disclosed and true to the personal knowledge of the counsel for applicant, order dated 5.7.2011 is recalled and Writ Petition No. 5881 of 2010 is restored back to the file. 2. Writ Petition No. 5881 of 2010 : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGP for respondent no. 3. 3. It is apparent that the petitioner wants a channel of promotion from the post of Madatnis to Anganwadi Sevika or direct appointment for 10th standard pass Madatnis as Anganwadi Sevika. The Government Resolution issued on 5th August 2010 does not contain the said condition. It only provides for direct appointment of Mini Aanganwadi Sevika as Anganwadi Sevika and if she is 10th standard pass, or as Madatnis , that too, when Mini Anganwadi Centre is converted as Anganwadi. Thus, the petitioner wants a positive change and 2 she is seeking mandamus. The petitioner, therefore, has to follow appropriate law in this respect. 4. With liberty to petitioner to take necessary steps and to approach this Court if the grievance still subsists thereafter, present petition is disposed of. No costs. Judge Judge joshi