1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.2068 OF 2009 Rajesh Tulsidas Belani .. Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.Rajiv Patil i/b P.V.Nelson Rajan, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. P.P.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 22/06/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.I-271 of 2008 of Kashmira Police Station. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 302, 120(B), 392 read with 34 of IPC and under sections 3,25,27 of Indian Arms Act. 3. I have perused the FIR. The complainant-Jafar Khan has given detailed version as to how the incident occurred and what T 2 was the role played by each of the accused including the present applicant. From the statement of the complainant, it is clear that the applicant was not only present but he played very active role in the alleged incident. Having considered overall facts and circumstances of the case and the role attributed and allegedly played by the applicant, I am not inclined to enlarge him on bail. Hence, the application is rejected. However, having considered the age of the applicant and the other accused, trial is expedited. While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)