IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-12236 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 28, 2010 Nirmal Singh .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.H.S.Deol, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for directing respondents to take action on the representations Annexures P6 and P7. Heard. It has been argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has already moved representations Annexures P6 and P7, dated 9.4.2010 and 11.4.2010 respectively, before respondent no.2, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police, S.A.S.Nagar, Mohali, and that petitioner will be satisfied if respondent no.2 is directed to look into the same. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2, i.e.,Senior Superintendent of Police, S.A.S.,Nagar, Mohali, to look into representations Annexures P6 and P7, in accordance with law, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioner 28.4.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge