IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 20TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 4088 of 2011(I) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ KIRAN ASHOK, MANAGING PARTNER, SUN ADS, TC NO.24/660, NEAR GOVERNMENT REST HOUSE, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 014. BY ADV. SRI.S.EASWARAN, SRI.P.MURALEEDHARAN (IRIMPANAM), SRI.M.A.AUGUSTINE. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SOUTHERN RAILWAY, REPRESENTED BY THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, COMMERCIAL BRANCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 014. 2. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER SOUTHERN RAILWAY, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 014. R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR.C.S. DIAS, SC FOR RAILWAY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/02/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 4088 of 2011 I ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 9th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner is against Exts.P3 and P4 issued by the respondents. Parties are governed by Ext.P1 agreement. Clauses 27 and 29 of Ext.P1 provide for arbitration as a method for resolution of disputes. Therefore, the remedy available to the petitioner is also under clauses 27 and 29 of Ext.P1. With that liberty, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge