IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.21950 of 2011 Date of Decision : November 26, 2011. Manju Kumari and another .....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Dr.Surya Parkash, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.R.D.Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and Mr.Aman Arora, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. There appears to be no necessity to issue notice to respondent No.3 at this stage as no relief has been sought against him. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent CWP No.21950 of 2011 [2] No.2 to consider the claim of the petitioners regarding declaration of their result in the light of the observations/directions made by this Court vide order dated 28.9.2011 passed in CWP No.12051 of 2011 (Monika and others versus State of Haryana and others) (Annexure P-4), within a period of one week from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. The necessary consequences shall also follow. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. November 26, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE