IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 164 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 26/02/2008 in WP NO : 2343 OF 1999 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Dr. S.V. Ravindranath S/o. S.V. Surendranath Hospital Tarnaka, Hyderabad. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Board of Directors A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by its Chairman Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Vice Chairman & Managing Director A.P.S.R.T.C. Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 3 The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Secretary Medical & Health Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR.RAJENDRA BUSSA Counsel for the Respondents: K.MADHAVA REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC) The Division Bench of this Court made the following : (Judgment follows 2nd page) THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI A N D THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 164 of 2009 JUDGMENT : (Per the Hon’ble Mrs. Justice T. Meena Kumari) The writ appeal is filed against the orders dated 26- 2-2008 passed by the learned single Judge in WP.No. 2343 of 1999 which was filed for a writ of certiorari and after calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order No.Ee/232(9)/89-PD, dated 21-7-1998 issued by the second respondent on behalf of the first respondent and consequently to direct the respondents to pay salary and allowance for the period from 24-11-1980 to 04-9-19881 and also grant three advance increments for having acquired higher qualification of M.S. (General Surgery) and the learned single Judge after hearing the matter, whereby he directed the Board of Directors of the Corporation to examine the petitioner’s claim for payment of salary for the period of deputation to NIMHANS Bangalore from 24-11-1980 to 04-11-1981, in any event not later than four months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order and rejected his claim for grant of additional increments for the period from August 1982 to September 1985 and accordingly disposed of the said writ petition. Aggrieved thereby, the present writ appeal is filed. 2. When the matter came up under the caption ‘for admission’, Sri Bussa Rajendra, the learned counsel for the appellant advanced his arguments extensively and after visualizing the disinclination of this court sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ appeal. 3. Permission accorded. 4. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn at the admission stage. No costs. _________________________ JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI. ___________________________ JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY 18-2-2009. I s L ........REGISTRAR To 1. 2.2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WA {KBJ}