IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 894 of 2001 (M/B) 1. Balak Ram S/o Sri Dhoomu Singh @ Dhoomu 2. Jeetmal S/o late Sri Ganeshu 3. Pooran Singh S/o Late Sri Ganeshu 4. Purna Nand S/o Sri Bharav Dutt 5. Dinesh S/o Sri Bharav Dutt 6. Nathi Singh S/o late Sri Daultu 7. Betal Singh S/o late Sri B. Mangal Singh 8. Dalew Singh S/o late Sri Mohan Singh 9. Mohan Singh S/o late Sri Hukum Singh 10. Vijaipal Singh S/o late Sri Asharu 11. Hari Singh S/o late Sri Khem Singh 12 Ratan Singh S/o late Thepar Singh 13. Kundan Singh S/o late Gosai Singh 14. Jagmati Devi D/o of late Sri Ratan Singh 15. Soni Devi D/o late Sri Mor Singh 16. Jai Singh S/o late Narayan Singh 17. Bishan Singh S/o late Sri Ghoomu 18. Div Chandra S/o Sri Roopa 19. Kama Devi W/o late Sri Jagat Singh 20. Soban Singh S/o late Sri Mohan Singh 21. Narayan Singh S/o late Sri Kamal Singh 22. Prem Chand S/o late Sri Roopa 23. Vikram Singh S/o late Sri Gundar Singh 24. Dhanpal Singh S/o late Sri Kalyan Singh 25. Chandan Singh S/o late Sri Nathi Singh 26. Dharam Singh S/o late Sri Pooran Singh @ Punnu All residents of Village Mali Deval, Patti Juwa, District Tehri Garhwal. …………. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal Through its Chief Secretary, Dehradun. 2. State of U.P. through its Chief Secretary Lucknow. 3. Union of India, through its Chief Secretary New Delhi. 4. Director Rehabilitation, Tehri Dam Project, Tehri Garhwal. 5. Executive Engineer, Investigation and Planning Division I, Pasulok, Rishikesh, Dehradun. ………. Respondents ……….. Sri Pradeep Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents 1, 4 and 5. None for respondents 2 and 5. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Sri Pradeep Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents 1, 4 and 5. None for respondent 2 and 5. 2. Sri Pradeep Joshi, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty of filing another petition with all the relevant and necessary details. 3. Permission granted. 4. With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 20.06.2006 20.06.2006 A