IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Appeal No.20 of 2010 Smt. Shabana Parveen …….. Appellant Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ....….. Respondents Coram:- Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, Chief Justice Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, Judge Present: Mr. C.D. Bahuguna, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for the respondents. J.S. Khehar, C.J. (Oral) Date of Decision: 30.04.2010 (CLMA (Delay Condonation Appln.) No.2603/2010) For the reasons recorded in the application, delay in filing the joint counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 is condoned. (SPA No.20 of 2010) Joint counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. The solitary prayer made in the instant appeal, according to the learned counsel for the appellant, has been satisfied, inasmuch as, the respondents have taken a decision on the claim made by the appellant for voluntary retirement. As such, learned counsel for the appellant states, that the instant special appeal has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such. Learned counsel for the respondents states, that he has no objection to the acceptance of the prayer made by the learned counsel appellant. In view of the above, the instant special appeal is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Needless to mention, that it will be open to the appellant to assail the order passed by the respondents on the application made by the appellant claiming voluntary retirement. P.Singh ( Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. ) ( J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 30.04.2010