20.wp.10111.09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10111 OF 2009 Prashant Kumar and others. ..Petitioners. Versus Shikshan Shulka Samiti and 3 others. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Manoj Shirsat, Advocate i/b. Mr.Uday Warunjikar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Rajesh Behre, Advocate a/w. Ms.Priya Vaotty, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr.S.V. Pitre, Advocate i/b. Manoj Wadekar & Asso. for respondent No. 2. Mr.S.R. Nargolkar, A.G.P., for respondent No.3. Mr.Girish Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No.4. .... CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH, AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 21ST JANUARY, 2010. P.C.:- 1. The petitioners challenge a resolution passed by the Shikshan Shulka Samiti. The only ground on which the resolution is challenged is that the course run by respondent No.2 is a part time course. By the letter dated 1st April, 2009 it is clearly declared by the Government that the course is full time course. 20.wp.10111.09 2 That decision was rescinded by the Government by a subsequent communication dated 1st July, 2009. It is clear from the order dated 6th November, 2009 passed by this Court that that order dated 1st July, 2009 has been set aside. Therefore, now the only order in the field is the communication dated 1st April, 2009 which declares the course to be full time course. Therefore, we do not find any substance in the Petition. Petition is rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J) (A.R. JOSHI,J)