CR No. 296 of 2003 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 296 of 2003 Date of decision:- 2.12.2010 Punnu Ram ......petitioner vs. Rajinder and ors ......respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - None for the petitioner HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) Petitioner is aggrieved against the order passed by learned Executing Court on 8.10.2002 whereby the execution filed by the petitioner was dismissed. The petitioner filed a civil suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering into his possession. The said suit was decreed on 30.9.1985. The petitioner filed an execution which was dismissed being fully satisfied on 14.12.1991. The decree holder filed another execution application which was dismissed on 14.8.1996 in view of the earlier statement. Thereafter, another execution was filed which was also dismissed. It has also been noticed by learned Executing Court that the petitioner filed another civil suit, which was withdrawn on 10.11.2001 in view of the decree granted earlier. I do not find any illegality in the findings recorded by learned Executing Court that the petitioner cannot be permitted to file repeated executions as earlier execution filed by the petitioner was dismissed as satisfied. CR No. 296 of 2003 -2- In view of the above, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the orders passed by the learned Executing Court which may warrant any interference in the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Revision is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 2.12.2010 preeti