SOTXM? iissawin »{ Raipsr Wsu. Hsapufi "'.'••' *°'* <^t **8-WB-"M:P' ^y ^...'"•''"'^.^^ ^A,':':-^---'^^ •^J'Y&ifgNT W THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. AT-BILASPURfC.G.) WRIT PETITION N0.^ (s.^ OF 2004 BETWEEN PETITIQNER ^>s^ ^""^y^ ^••^"^•"".f< y,..--^.---^.^ ••"' -v>t\-"" ^••" <^ ,,.<^^< ^v°\..-f^ ^&«*• VERSUS 'CHARNDRA SEKHAR TIWARI AGED-50YEARS SON OF LATE SHRI JHUMUK LAL POSTED AS - ASSISTANT GRADE - II AT - 0/0 DISTRICT URBAN DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, DURG (C.G.) R/0 SUBHASH NAGAR, WARD N0. 40, KASARIDIH, DURG (C.G.) Ji&uffTttt-n RESPONDENTS y'^L •i? .> 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH - THE SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT D.K.S. MANTRALAY, RAIPUR. 2. THE COLLECTOR, / DISTRICT-DURG(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE- 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROfflBITION. -SUllABUELDTRKrTTON OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSQ^RH: BILASPUR PEnTIONER WR1TPETITION N0.47^ OF 2004 Ghanctra Sekhar Twrari RESPONDENTS Versus Stete of Chhattisgarh & Another (Writ Petition underArticle 226 & 227 ofthe Constitirtton of tndla) "^ • L . - .' Singte Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K Agnihotri, J. Present:- None for the petitioner. ShriN.N. Roy, Panel Lawvyer for the State. ORDERfORAU (Passedon this ^"day OfMarch, 2010) The matter is catled for hearing twice. On botti occaaons, npne appears nor js any representation made on betatf of tto petltibner. The petttioner may not be Interested in the matter. 2) In view of the above, the writ petition is dismi^ed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Satish I^. AgnUiotri Judge Gowri