IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.137 of 2008 SIYA RAM HARIZAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 10.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The service of the petitioner was terminated on 12.12.1995. His claim was that though appointed as a daily wagers, he had been regularized. This Court while disposing C.W.J.C. No. 2976 of 2002 on 27.2.2002 noticed as follows:- “The learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of argument has stated that he is not pressing the prayer for setting aside the order of termination (Annexure-4). However, a direction be issued to the respondent for payment of arrears of wage/salary, as indicated above. According to him, representation has also been filed for payment of arrears of wage/salary (Annexure-5).” Once the petitioner accepted the order of his termination, any fresh claim thereunder on any ground whatsoever is barred by res-judicata. The writ application is dismissed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)