WP(C) 3261/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. A. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. H. Buragohain, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4. I have also heard M r. B.K. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department. This is case is covered by the order passed today in WP(C) No. 3 260/2010 except the fact that while in the instant case, the Anganwadi center is admittedly a Mini Anganwadi center, but in WP(C) No. 3260/2010, there is disput e as to whether the center in question is a Mini Anganwadi center or not. Since the instant case, the center in question is a Mini Angawad i Center, the respondent No. 4 duly conforms to the requirement of the education qualification, in support of which she has produced Annexure-R/2 transfer certi ficate dated 4.8.2009. In terms of which she was a student of Class-IX in 1989. In view of the above, the grounds on which the selection and app ointment of the respondent No. 4 have been challenged do not survive. Consequent ly, the writ petition is dismissed.