skt/- nms4294.09 in s.3236.09.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4294 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 3236 OF 200 2009 M/s.Joy Homecreation ...Plaintiff. Vs. Kalyani Babu Shetty & Ors. ...Defendants. ..... Mr.Dasgupta i/by Jhangiani, Narula & Associates for the plaintiff. Mr.N.N.Bhadrashete, Advocate for defendant nos. 1 to 6. ..... CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 8th JANUARY, 2010. P.C.- 1. The plaintiff termed as a Developer, filed a suit for specific performance against defendant nos. 1 to 7 who are co-owners of the property. They are not pressing relief against defendant no.7 as he was not the signatory to the Memorandum of Understanding. The parties have arrived at settlement and accordingly, consent terms dated 8th January 2010 is filed excluding defendant no.7. It is countersigned by respective advocates. The contents are explained to defendant no.1 also. The plaintiff's Director and defendant nos. 3 & 4 are present in Court. The consent terms marked 'X', taken on skt/- nms4294.09 in s.3236.09.sxw 2 record. The statement is made that consent terms are well within the framework of law and the record. There is no dispute about the identification, authorization of any kind. 2. The suit is accordingly disposed of in view of consent terms with liberty to defendant no.7. 3. In view of above, Notice of Motion No. 4294 of 2009 is also disposed of. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)