1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A. No. 6873/2006 (Akil Ahmed Ab.Hamid Siddiqui & another VERSUS State Bank of India) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Shri Raj Wakode, counsel for the applicant. Shri M.R. Pillai, counsel for the respondent. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : JULY 7, 2008. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. It appears that there is a delay of 158 days in filing the appeal. It is stated in the civil application that the applicant was ill during the relevant period, and hence, was not able to file the appeal in time. It is further stated in the civil application that the applicant also did not possess the amount to purchase the Court Fee Stamps. The prayer made in the civil application is strongly opposed by the counsel for the respondent. It is submitted on behalf of the respondent that the Doctor's certificate does not appear to be genuine and there appears to be no cause for condoning the delay caused in filing the appeal. 2 I have perused the contents of the civil application as also the medical certificate filed by the applicant. On perusal of the same, it is apparent that there was sufficient cause for the applicant in not filing the appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. The civil application is, therefore, allowed and disposed of. The matter may be listed for admission on 17.07.2008. JUDGE APTE