THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24272 of 2010 Date:29.09.2010 Between: Jampani Srinivas Rao and others. ..... Petitioners AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary and others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Sricharan Telaprolu Counsel for Respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue The Court made the following: ORDER: The grievance of the petitioners is that respondent No.4, who has conducted survey of land to an extent of Acs.3.25 cents in survey No.130/C of Purshothamapatnam, Chilakaluripeta Mandal, Guntur District, on 18.01.2010, on the application of petitioner No.3, located Ac.0.10 ½ cents out of Ac.0.25 cents and concluded the survey without identifying the entire extent. The petitioners pleaded that petitioner No.3 was advised by respondent No.4 to make a fresh application to respondent No.3 for measuring the entire sub-division, if desired, and that on such advice the said petitioner has submitted another application dated 03.04.2010 along with requisite fee to respondent No.3 for surveying the entire sub-division of survey No.130/C and part and requested the authorities to fix the boundaries in respect thereof. As survey was not conducted, two of the petitioners have submitted representation dated 27.08.2010 requesting respondent No.2 to fix the boundaries in respect of the said Ac.0.25 cents. As respondent No.2 has not responded to the said representation, the petitioners filed the present writ petition. After hearing the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, I am of the opinion that in order to put a quietus to the dispute, it would be appropriate if proper survey is undertaken by respondent Nos.2 to 4 under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 (for short ‘the Act’). As the petitioners are stated to have applied for such a survey by paying necessary fee, respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are directed to consider the said representation and conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the Act within a reasonable time. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.31054 of 2009 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 29th September, 2010 GHN