IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.834 of 2011 Bhola Shankar Pandey @ Bhola Pandey Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 30.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. Petitioner/one of the accused is aggrieved by an order dated 14.12.2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-IInd, Gaya with regard to Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No.50/2003, Sessions Trial No.379/illegible whereby and where under the learned lower court had allowed the prayer of the prosecution to examine remaining witnesses under Section 311 of the Cr.P.C. though case of the prosecution stood closed on 25.9.2010 and the trial was lingering for statement of the accused. Form the order impugned it also transpires that the charge was framed on 22.5.2004. It is also manifest from the order impugned that there was attendance of all the witnesses before the learned lower court. Taking into account the totality of the event, the prosecution is given two adjournments only on which date all the witnesses whose name figures in the order impugned must be examined failing which, no further opportunity will be given to the prosecution. With the aforesaid instant petition is disposed of. PN (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)