IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2009 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 16750 of 2009(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ THE PRESIDENT, TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT KONCH SHELL PILOT INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO L-IND(T)235, VIZHINJAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE GENERAL MANAGER, DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR,DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 16750 OF 2009 (K) ===================== Dated this the 17th day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T It is stated that pursuant to Ext.P1, an enquiry under Section 65 was conducted into the affairs of the society, of which the petitioner is the President and a report was submitted. Acting upon the report so received, the 1st respondent has now issued Ext.P2 show cause notice to the petitioner calling upon the petitioner to furnish their explanations in the matter. 2. Petitioner has two grievances. One is that copy of the report submitted, based on which Ext.P2 has been issued, has not been furnished. Secondly, they should also get an opportunity to make their representations in the matter before final orders are passed in pursuance to Ext.P2. 3. Having heard the counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I think the petitioner is justified in the submissions made. 4. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions. (1) That on production of a copy of this judgment, the 1st WPC 16750/09 :2 : respondent shall furnish a copy of the report on the basis of which Ext.P2 notice has been issued to the petitioner. (2) It is directed that in order to enable the petitioner to file an effective reply to Ext.P2, the time for filing the reply will also stand enlarged by 2 weeks from the date of service of the copy of the report. Once an objection to Ext.P2 is filed, petitioner shall also be given an opportunity of hearing. (3) Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent on or before 20th of June 2009, for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp