^^^^^ -^:—!^-,^.^^ k \ o^]^ '<•h IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W,P,NO. 3 B -I 5~/ 2005 Petitioner ...-•^ ,.^^ ^-•f^y / ,•' ^w/ Y'-^y ^yf^ ^ ^ .y' Versus Respondents : 1. 3. Heera Lal Dhruv/Aged about 59 years S/o Shri Ramratan Dhniv, Suspended Head Master, Primary school Sidesar, Block Development Kanker, Tah & Dist :Kanker, Headquarter during suspension at Project Administrator, Narayanpur, R/o ViUage & Post - Govindpur, Dist: Kanker-(C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Home Department of Adim Jati Kalyan Vibhag, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur-(C.G) The Collector, Kanker Dist: Kanker (C.G.). The Commissioner, Tribal Development Chhattisgarh, Dist: Raipur-(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226J_^27_QFJ2iE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA XI-HC-78 Hn^T^m^ vjwc| ^ll^lrt^l, tPTn'<1<IC, RiOW^X W—iff"< •U^l ••^••••——•• •— — • <^" •*7"/•••••^200V OT^^T^Tf^TPP ?t2ngn^ST!pqN? 1— ^rn^i 3TT^5T q^cp (yi^<si<s) g^TTan^rf^r^^T u/.uy.2UUb" Mr. Rakesh Anthony, learne 4>i^ilrt41^ ^i^c^T^'fe^ KRii^i^ ^arf^TOT^^T ^l counsel forthe petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, l|earned Panel Lawyer for the State of Chhattisgarh. Learned counsel forthe petit as Assistant Teacher at Primary suspension order was passed on| allegations of forgery and manip( government. The petitioner has file| order dated 06.01.1998 seekingl joner submits that the petitionerwas working ?chool, Sidesar, District Kanker, when the 06.01.1998 on the ground that there are Mlation of the documents to mislead the pthis petition on 07.08.2005 challenging the quashing of the impugned order dated 06.01.1998. This Court on hearing tjhe petitioner and perusing the records, came to the conclusion that the suspensi<| allegations which require a detailed ^nquiry. Learned counsel for the petitioneris not in a position to tell whether any petitioner or not. Learned couns| criminal case has been lodged agai ^n orderwas passed on the basis of oertain Jepartmental enquiry is pending against the for the petitioner further submits that a pist the petitloner and challan has been filed. Learned counsel for the petitioner f(|irther submits that the petitioner has filed an application before Madhya Pradesji State Administrative Tribunal, which was dismissed on 11.01.2001. ^sl The present petition does n<| underArtide 227 of the Constitutioil filed seeking the same relief, which In view ofthe above stated fi The petition stands disposec) rt impugn the order passedbythe Tribunal This is an jndependent petition, which is las been rejected by the Tribunal. icts, there is no merit in this case. of. No order as to costs. Consequently, all pending ap|?lications also stahd disposed of. Sd/- satisb^T ibotri