c, SSNGLE BEIUCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARHAT BILASPUR Writ petition fC1 No-f6^€ /2011 PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS 1- .^ A^A^.. ^I^-"" V'M^,-^\ ^0'''-^"' ...•'*'\ €^-^ •\€\ y^-- ^" Mohd Ashif Khan, S/o Pyare Miyan, aged about 46 years, R/o Plot No. 391 Vindhyawasini Ward No. 15 Kawardha. Distt-Kabirdham. (CG). Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Kawardha District - Kabirdham. (CG) Municipal Council Kawardha through The Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council Kawardha , Distt-Kabirdham. (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA. z\ HTGH COIJRT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BTT,A8PIJR WRFT PETmON (C) No. 5676 of2011 PETITIONER RE.8PONDENT8 Mohd. AshifKhan. VER8IJS State ofChhattisgarh & Another. Amit WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS'nTUriON OF INDIA SB: Hon'We Shri Satish K. Agmliotrl, J. Present: Shri Ashok Vai^hnav^ Advocate tbr the petitioner. SM Shashatik Tliakur, Paiiel Lawyei' for tlie StaWrespotidetit No. 1. Shri Anm 8ao, Advocate for the respondent No«2» ORDER (Passed on 26ul-da^ofSq)tember, 2011) At the very outset^ Shri 8ao, leamed couasel apparmg for the respondent No, 2, on instnictioxL submits that no demolition in respect of the property m dispute shall take plaee withoirt following the due process of law and withoirt affbrding an opportiinity ofhearmg to the petitioner. In view ofthe above submission, according to leamed coimsel for the p€?titioner, nothing survives for adjudicatioii m this mattCT at thisstage Accordmgly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforestated obseryation, Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge