IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH JANUARY 2010 / 7TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 32399 of 2009(T) ------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SHEEBA V.K. AGED 24 YEARS, D/O.KALYANI, NJARAMPILLIKUDIYIL HOUSE, SOUTH VELLARAPPILLY, SREEMOOLANAGARAM P.O., VIA KALADI,PIN 683580 BY ADV. SRI.BIMAL K.NATH SRI.S.JAMAL SRI.E.M.SUNIL KUMAR SRI.SREEVALSAN.V RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. S.I. OF POLCIE, KALADI 2. PRAKASAN, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O. KESAVAN, VARIKKATTUKUDI HOUSE, MUDAKKUZHA KARA, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. VIA. KURUPPUMPADY, PERUMBAVOOR 3. KESAVAN, AGED 60 YEARS, VARIKKATTUKUDI HOUSE, MUDAKKUZHA KARA, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, VIA KURUPPUMPADY, PERUMBAVOOR. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.K. PUSHPALATHA ADV. SRI.K.R.KURUP FOR R3,4 SRI.C.R.VINOD KUMAR FOR R3,4 SRI.A.R.GEORGE(MEDIATOR) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C). NO. 32399 OF 2009 T PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1TRUE COPY OF THE F.I.R. EXT.P2TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 22.5.2009. EXT.P3TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 8.11.09. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // PS to Judge K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- W.P(C). NO.32399 OF 2009 T --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th January, 2010 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. Petitioner seeks adequate police protection to the life of the petitioner and her family members from the threat of respondents 2 and 3. A direction is also sought to take appropriate steps on Ext.P3 complaint. 2. Briefly put, the case of the petitioner is as follows: Petitioner married the second respondent. There was demand for dowry at the time of marriage. It is stated that respondents 2 and 3 and other family members were not satisfied. A case is said to be registered under Sections 498(A) and 34 of the IPC. It is stated that there is threat. This Court had ordered mediation. Mediation has failed. 3. We heard the learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for respondents 2 and 3 submits that there is no W.P.(C).NO.32399 OF 2009 T 2 possibility of re-union. But, he submits that there is no threat to the life of the petitioner from the side of respondents 2 and 3 and there will be no threat. A Counter Affidavit is also filed on the same lines. Recording the submissions, the Writ Petition is closed. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge