IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.10682/2010 [HARI SINGH CHARAN VS. NEHRU YUVA KENDRA] Date of order : 19.11.2010 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PRAKASH TATIA HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI Mr.Vinay Jain for the petitioner ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. As aggrieved against the order dated 28.10.2010, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur whereby the petitioner's O.A. No.139/2010 was dismissed by the tribunal, this writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner. The petitioner has challenged substantially his transfer order on various grounds and particularly on the ground that there was no administrative exigency for transfer of petitioner and further where the petitioner has been transferred there is no need on the date when the order was passed. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order was passed malafidely. We have perused the reason given by the Tribunal in the order dated 28.08.2010 and the petitioner's above grounds have been well considered by the Tribunal and we do not found any illegality in the said order. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner moved two applications for impleading the party but those applications have not been decided when Tribunal found that there is no merit in the OA then there is hardly any reason for deciding those applications. In view of the above discussion, we do not find any merit in this writ petition. Hence the writ petition is dismissed. However, petitioner will free to submit his representation to the Competent Authority who may take any decision appropriately in accordance with the administrative exigency. (KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI ), J. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. /mamta/