1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.18 OF 1999 Shri Anil Appasaheb Athani .. Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & ors .. Respondents Mr.R.K.Mendadkar for Petitioner Mr. V.S.Gokhale, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent no.1 Mr.G.S.Hegde for Respondent no.4 CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : S.B.MHASE AND S.B.MHASE AND S.B.MHASE AND D.G.KARNIK, D.G.KARNIK, D.G.KARNIK, JJ JJ JJ DATED DATED DATED : 12th January, 2006 : 12th January, 2006 : 12th January, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions from the petitioner states that the petitioner desires to withdraw the petition and make a representation to the respondent nos. 3 and 4 for the purpose of considering regularisation of the service of the petitioner in view of the Government Circular dated 15th June, 1995 and G.R.dated 30th June, 2004. We have no doubt that if any representation is made by the petitioner, it will be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. 2 2. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (D.G. (D.G. (D.G. KARNIK, J) KARNIK, J) KARNIK, J) (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J) J) J)