® @ AMENDED —PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (8.) NO. S$ §4 /2009 PETITIONER Laxmi Narayan Sharma S/o Late Shri Babulal Sharma, Aged about 64 years, Occupation Retired Assistant Commercial Tax Officer, R/o B—S, Gulmohar Vatika, Near Anmol Super Bazar Mahaveer Nagar, New Puraina Rajpur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh ' Through : Secretary Commercial Tax, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner Aadim Jati Vikash, Ravishankar University Campus, Raipur (C.G.) m 3. Assistant Commissioner, Aadim Jati Vikash, Collector Parisar, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Principal Govt. Higher Secondary School, Manpur, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 5. Commissioner Commercial Tax, Opposite Rajbhawan, Civil Line, Raipur (C.G.) JW 6. Deputy Commercial Rajbhawan, (Chhattisgarh ) 9 . Prinicipal Aadim Jati, Anusandhan Avam Prashikshan Sanstha, 12. The Joint Director Treasury Accounts, & Pension, Raipur, Ghari Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to .submit as under : PARTICULARSOF THE PETITIONER:- As stated above in cause title, K g Commissioner, Tax Opposite Civil Line Raipur 8. Commercial Tax Offlcer, Indore Circle II Through Commissioner, M.G. Road, Commercial Tax, Indore (M.P.) Chhindwada, Distt Chhindwada (M.P.) Commission, Indore (M.P.) 7. Commissioner, Commercial Tax, M.G. Road, Indore (M.P.) 10. The Secretary Public Service Residency Area, 1 1. Block Development Officer, (Chief Executive Officer) Nagari, District Dhamtari (C.G.)' ‘; amGER Laxm§ Mammw gnaw SFGNDENTS N? 0) x§§ HKBH COSRT 6F CS’EH’ TYE$GI§RH ; EILAa?L§F€ \‘#" 3taie of sga» n & 0t“ s is Ofi we Qans‘hmaisr‘ a? iradia": & Be nch Hambie Sm; $a‘i33h K Agw?‘om J '{Wa’ii ige‘iiiien Lime? A§§c§e M :1 I) al; a? revwm ” Wi€h me ccmem a? §eame<§ :30Lm5e? §b§ me gartiaS. ihe 3'3e’m n s5 head Enaiw. ??1i$ case pei’iaii‘zs $0 gr:eva 1c; of muggf: <3? :etimE duea, Lammez} acmsei amearmg €13? {he §e2§§éa§aeh w énsimcmna sub“ i t tne m Kewwav ' ‘ c¥ 16 §h»3 ‘1; a: i,‘ aea Th%$ Cam, ii‘a WFNGA 42,2{JG4 {Baéjnath Ma § Va The Siaiie {if r ia Chham 6‘3““: & $zh~§s§ am 0M9! a;c)rme::k;ed m rs‘ é§i~$$ied $he a E Cemm‘giiee w cmsédef the mi «=4 e? ’emas a ieg as thé dismigd ques‘iim‘; cf facias were §;1\is§veé, 'fhe CGm e was can k u éu if}: rhe ma¥e Gavemmrgni'. nursuam is the awér qéaiac? 1&66-23g5v3 pa33ad m WFNO 961,2 G5 (Smt a Bai Chawg‘akar Vs. Ekaée Gaviea'maem e‘é‘ Chhai§sga§h aid ”ha am eg'dez‘ ciatEd ‘1E—3—2GG8 gatssed §n Jgam emc (am-$553 V3. aairjnaii“ Thus. ”as geimm is aawmv gauere‘“ uy ie ci or dame: 3” éanuary, 2W8 pa5$e§ in W‘9N0. n mie Zanéa§ isumrx"; as submiited by mamed cauns‘gi v MCI? :“0. ”é o 20% i$ aée 0f T% as saw: ‘ u as acuorcimmv msge$ed (f ‘n f e Same '§:e;m$ Le . me Caf§cre sf the Advocate Gwemi §$ direciec: m se ri :he case t0 mp Vamuiiee. wxiqm a pa; 0a nf b days fmwa m V dai a: g'ewipt 6f a wpy s?th%s Mae: ‘The¥e3‘€e;, he Vamm‘éeae shali wane {w {ye ta he pet; W16? 1m: cams” W \ cancemeij wéihm a ‘hrme: w? mi 3a @5 aaJs ‘E‘hé $0mm§t€ee shaL‘ cwsirjes’ a ; $55158 awe? 1r wwwamc §a v; dJer ‘mm Vm gape? Gaye'nmgi’v of haagmg £0 ‘me g‘iiijoraer The gw‘ticma' and :he off‘kwrs aancemed mav £36 additiwa§ éxzimem$, §f necessary“ The Lyme exemi$e§ §nc§wjmg Esayme L sf ? 5:1 du’sa , ar‘iy‘ tic ma paiitémea ba- camgéew wnmr‘ a pe 1w d faam a'wnmb mm he slate 631‘ em: é‘ o a saw 6% £3 af§a a. The petmcmef smii supp-W om: campieie set G? 29% ae€§mn ea the S’ia:;e counsei for ‘iva’lsfewhug 1% camVA t0 the Va’rm Mae Sd/— batlsh K Agmhm“ Govwi t; r- Judge v