IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3196 OF 2005 ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.3197 OF 2005 ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.3200 OF 2005 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:------------------------------------ Mrs.Smita Mane for the petitioners. Mrs.Kantharia for the Union of India. CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 30TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 DATED: 30TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 DATED: 30TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 P.C.: . This Court has already taken a view that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the judgment in Writ Petition No.1532 of 2000 where it is observed thus: "Respondent Nos.1 to 4 are directed to appoint the Collector for the purpose of inviting claims on fixation of compensation within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the writ of this Court. The Collector shall issue public notice to all the concerned landholders in the restricted zones within a period of eight weeks from the date of his appointment and thereafter, hear the landholders including the petitioners and pass appropriate Award in accordance with the provisions of Section 12 preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt of the claims form the landholders." . In view of the fact that the direction to the Collector clearly includes the persons like the present petitioners they are governed by that order. The petitions are disposed of as such. ...