IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39703 of 2009 1. ANIL PANDEY S/O SRI RAM LAKHAN PANDEY R/OVILL BAIKATPUR, P.S.KHUSRUPUR, DISTT- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner in a complaint case under Sections 498A, 376 and other provisions of the Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act is that the allegations under Section 376 are against another. The petitioner is the husband of the Aunt in- laws of the alleged victim against whom cognizance was not taken when he has been summoned under Section 319 of the Cr. P.C. Considering his undertaking to be adequately co- operate in disposal of the trial, let the petitioner above named surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge- Ist, Barh in connection with Barh Session Trial No. 1661/07 arising out of Complaint Case No. 71(C)/2006. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)