IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISCrARH A'rBILftSmjS WRITPETITtONNO.S^lO /200S PETITIONERS ^<%^2- ^s^ .^^y '^^^ J^^ N> ^y //^'•^^^^ ^^ ^4. Y Narayan Ram Nagesh, Aged about 35 years, S/a. ^ Shri Ghamru Ram, Teacher F'rimary School, Malsema, Residerit of Village Mudhi; Distnct Jashpur, (C.G.) Raja Ram Yadav, S/6. Shn Balpan Yadav, Aged ^bout 30 years, Teacher Priinary SGhool BoiTpokhar, Resident of yill^e Mahnai,DistrictJashpur (C.G.)^ SlnfeCharidramani Bai, ' /o,^tet'i Bhularr Ram Naggsiya, ^ed abouf 27 years, TeaAer Priniary School <Tamharkona, Residerit of Village Bhadiya, District Jashpur (C.G.) Smt. Fagiya Bai, W/o. Shrr Ghutaru Ram, Aged about 32 years, Teacher E'rimary SchQol Bamhani, Resident pf Village Kopa, District Jashpur (C.G.) Prabhu Das Tirki, S/Q. Shri Selbestar TirtEi, Ageff at^out 29 years, TeaGher Prunaiy ] SefaQoI Chfaalgatoii, ^SBadent ^of] ;Vtl]^ge; DumiaTkona,^ DistEtet .3£tSii|i!Bi .(G.G.)-:.''-; ..:' :\':;,^ 'is^sss^. ;S.I WKW RESPONDENTS .'<;^ t. •/i:'/ '\^ ll "i:«^:'iS^*:l 11 /pii,S?'"ft^(S.T.)i SA-.'"^ 2k '^.^, / 6. Balram Uraon, Aged abouf 29 years, S/o. Samrath Ram, Teacher Primary School Parshapani, Resident of ViHage Maino, District Jashpur (C.G.) 7. Smt.Champawati Bai, Aged about 30 years, W/o. Shri Purushottam Teacher Primaiy School Semarjobla, Resident of Village Samarwar, Distt. Jashpur (G.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Ghhattisgarh, . Through the Ghief SeGretary, Department of EduG,ation» MaEitralya, D.K.S. Bhawart, Raipur. ^2. The Chief Ex|outive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bagicha, Jashpur (C.G.) ^"3. The District Education Officer, Jashpur, Distt.Jashpur(C.G.) / 4. The Block Education Officer, Bagicha, District Jashpur (C.G.) ^5. The Sarpanch/Secrefaiy, ViUage Panchayat. Mudho, Distnct Jashpur(e.G.), l .6. Tlie SarpancK/SecretaFy, Panctiayat MaUhai, [ . JashpiuT(C.O.) ;«SSI ^t. •:f':;^:l^^t%SSB3^ Y 7. /8. The Sarpanch/SeGretary, ViQage Panchayat Bhadiya, District Jashpur (C.G.) The SaTpanch/Secretary, Village Pdnehayat Kopa, District ^Jashpur (C.G.) ^ 9. The Sarpanch/SecTetary, Vfflage Panchayat Dumarkona, Disfi-ict Jashpur (C.G.) 10. The Sarpanch/Secretary, Vfflage Panchayat Maiiao, District Jashpur(C.G.) / 11. The Sarpanch/Secretarx, Panchayat SamarviTgr, Jashpur (C.G.) > WRTT PETTTIQN UNDER_AKT!CLE 226/227 QE'T^; CONSTITOm».©IivIN0m. v ' ai 1• XI-HC.78 *11*1WI $p*)TW ^SET "yi<llrtii,»TcTI<M4|^Rc4|<{-13'< _(^.f,.^L.. ^-l^) an^flrOTR-tjtb' awan^CTaCTriq; -<-.. fc^ < 3n^?iq^»('3?fg^) WlMte'mBt'Tfte^ ^Rl+dN ^•sif^Tgii^a Shri Ashok Soiii, coiin^ Shri Paukaj Shriva^ respondents No. 1,2, 3 aud Leartied counsel for lel forfhc petitioners. itava, Paael lawyer for fhe ^State. ' te petitioner subinits that fhe petitioners are hoMiug pttar Madhyaiaa Examination Certificate fixtin Bhardya V^dhya Bhawaa, Muiiibai.on fhe basis of said cerdficate, th^y were appointed as Gurujis in various schools of fhe St^te of Chliattisgarti. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad dated 18.8.2005 (Aiuiexure 'anchayat, Bagicha sent a letter P-1) to fhe Sarpanch/Secretaiy, Grain Paiichayat, Harrady>a, wherein it was stated fhat appointmexit of Cjurujis hasjbeeri niade on fhe basis of forged certificate as such show ::ause notices be issued to fh.e concemed Gurujis and to t^ke appropriate sfeps for reiaoval of aU fhe Gurujis flxim s^rvice. The petitioners filed fhis petition chaUenguig the i^itemal coimnuiucatk)n finm. the Chief Executive Of&cer, Ji^upad Panchayat, Bagicha dated 18.8.2005 to fhe Sarpa4ch./Secretary, Graia Paachayat, Harradipa- statmg fhat tfiis cominunication ainounts to B ^g 8• BB BI ^^- BC ^^?• \<,' XI-HC-78 *tl*l«l^1T^ \dwi *«i«irtq,i»-al'(i<!s,Rdl-yy . Jl^.'.f.;..'at>.'...^-.'.p....... 3)i^rwR-i aziTaii^raniw -tt'i 31T^?TiR^(iic[fg^) s~ a^iTW^riS?T3ii^?r ^-2-^ enquiry. Leamed counsel fol 'niqfCT<niiitni"^[fe>^|<Rit+^|'< ^diR)*)3ii^ar termiaation offhe petitioneijs without show cause notice or tbe petitioners infonned fhat no show cause notice has be^a issued aad consequential no temuiiation order has been FJassed, as yet. In view of the abo^i However, it is observed fhatj without foUowing the princi^ affording opporttmity ofheai|m.g to fhe petitioners. In view of fhe forei dismissed, accordiagly. No c] e, fhe petition is pre-m.g.ture. no tenniaation order be passed le of natural justice and without ;oiag, the writ petition stands rder as to costs. Sd/- SatisbK.Agnihotrt Judge fa ^ n ^^ ^^ 'S^'S IN 'fr Tl< ^ *v •< t