IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29491 of 2009 1. PANKAJ KUMAR KARN,son of Baidya Nath Prasad Karn 2. Ram Kishun Ravidas,s/o Ram Lal Ravidas Both resident of Quarter No.B/33, Paparwa, Tand,P.O.-Karhar Badi, C.C.L. Colony,Giridih,P.S.-Giridih,District- Giridih(Jharkhand) 3. Abhimanyu Lal Das,son of late Arjun Lal Das,resident of Sipahi Tola,Chunapur Road,P.S.-K.Hat,District-Purnia. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 14-10-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that differences in between the wife (complainant) and husband (petitioner no.1) and his relations have been made ground for accusation of offences under Sections 448, 323, 379, 384 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, while a case under Sections 498, 379, 406 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code filed by petitioner no.1 against the complainant and another case filed by the complainant for the offence under Section 498A against petitioner no.1 and his parents and also another case for restitution of conjugal right were pending between the parties. So, relying upon the allegations made in the complaint petitioners’ arrest cannot be justified. I agree with the same. Accordingly, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in Complaint Case No.928 of 2008, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub- section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )