IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.21 of 2009 ANUGRAH SINGH Versus MAHESH SINGH & ORS ----------- 2 15.1.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner. While this Court would not find any error in the impugned order rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for impleadment as a party in a suit confined to some entries in the Khatiyan pertaining to a land recorded in the name of State of Bihar, the petitioner’s concern and grievance that both the plaintiffs and the Circle Officer are in collusion and therefore, the interest of the State will not be subserved in the manner it should be, is a matter to be taken into account of by the Collector of the district who even otherwise is contesting the suit as the suit is filed in the name of the State of Bihar through the Collector. The Circle Officer is only representing the Collector of the district and therefore, if the petitioner brings to the notice this fact to the Collector that certain document or evidence is not being brought on record by the Circle Officer or anyone contesting the suit on his behalf (Collector), the Collector in the interest of State is expected to take appropriate action. With the aforementioned observations, this application is disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)