THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2924 OF 2007 ORDER: The petitioner-fifth judgment debtor filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the order dated 28.11.2006 in E.P.No.36 of 2006 in O.S.No.63 of 2002 on the file of the VI Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, in issuing attachment warrant of movables against the petitioner and some others. The main contention urged on behalf of the petitioner is to the effect that having regard to the nature of the judgment passed on 29.08.2006 in O.S.No.63 of 2002 on the file of the Additional Judge, City Small Causes Court-cum-VI Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, which is only against the other defendants but not against the petitioner-defendant No.5, the very objection raised by the petitioner now is not maintainable. Learned counsel submits that in fact, there has been a decree earlier on 05.12.2002, which remained undisturbed and became final. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and especially there being no serious dispute in regard to the earlier decree dated 05.12.2002, I do not find any reason to entertain the objection raised by the petitioner. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to raise all such objections in the execution, which shall be considered on merits and in accordance with law. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 10th December 2010 RRB