, ;,% tt) \goble% HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILSPUR DIVISION EENCH CORAM: HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON’BL SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, 3’. NLAJCI (PR) No. 2?10 of 2907 1_ Smt. Puthul Mandal, Aged about‘23'yearsx Widow of ate Shasun allas Tarak Mandal Ku. Priti Mandal, Aged about 7 years Ku. Nikita Mandal, Aged about 5 ye‘ars Sanjay Mandai, Aged about 3 years, Appellants No.2 to 4 are Minors son/daughter of Iate Shasun Mandal, through — natural guardian Puthul Mandal Smt. UshaMandaI, Aged abgut 45 years, Widow of Late Gaur Mandai, AII'are resident of P.L. Home, Mana Camp, Raipur (C.G.) Versus Makhan Mandaw Aged about 25 years /o Kanhaiya Mandav: Rio Gurmukha Nagar Panchpedi Naka P S Tikarapara, Raipur (C.G.) uddu Ram Patwari, S/o Lakhan Patwarir R/o Near Chhota Nagar,;P.S. Tikarap’ara, Raipur (C.G.) The National Insurance Co. Ltd., Through - the DNISionai Manager, DIVISIonaI Office Mobin Mahal Miscelianeous Appeal under Section 1 o the Motor V Vehicle Act INone for the appellants. E x _ r o i WFWNWWW A E APPELLANTS l RESPONDENTS S G 73 f 1988 ORDER (17m September, 2008) V ‘ The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellants. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no otherop‘tion but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. i. The appeal] terefore, is dismisse for want of prosecution. himml ’ t h ?