1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O. No. 779 of 2011 in C.A.F. no. 963/2011 in First Appeal No. 151 of 2002 Raghunath s/o Gopal Janbandhu VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and 2 others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's or Judge's orders Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders Nr.A.J. Pophaly, Adv. For appellant. Mr. M.A. Kadu, AGP for R-1 & 2. CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATE : 20.6. 2011 . By order dated 8.4.2011, period of two months was granted to deposit the amount with costs and interest in this court to the State. It was also clarified that if the amount is not deposited before 8th June, 2011, the State will have to pay additional cost of Rs.10,000/-. Despite lapse of two months period, the deposit has not been made. There is a prayer for extension of time by six months to deposit the amount. The Award was passed by the Tribunal on 5.11.2001. The amount is only of Rs. 43,000/-, and even that amount is not being deposited. The matter relates to the injuries caused by the accident to the person of the rank of District Judge who was taking walk on the street and was hit by the vehicle. Though the award was passed in the year 2001, the State has not bothered to deposit a single pie. 2 Now there is a prayer for six months time. The heading of the application does not show that any application of mind was made for filing such frivolous application. Except saying that the process of sanction to get paltry amount of Rs.43,000/- has been initiated, there is no other reason in the application. This court, therefore, makes the following order on the said Civil Application No.779/2011. Civil Application No. 779/2011 is partly allowed. The respondent State is directed to deposit the said amount under Award with costs and interest along with cost of Rs.10,000/- as indicated in the order dated 8.4.2011 on or before 31st of July, 2011. Failing to deposit the said amount before 31st July, 2011 shall result into payment of further cost of Rs.10,000/-. Put up on 1st of August, 2011. Service for respondent no.2 is waived by the learned AGP. JUDGE Hirekhan