IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2009 / 3RD ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 17486 of 2009(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P. MANOJ KUMAR, GOLD APPRAISER, WADAKKANCHERY BLOCK MULTI PURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES LIMITED R.1125 WADAKKANCHERY P.O. THRISSUR 680 528 BY ADV. SRI.P.N.MOHANAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. WADAKKANCHERY BLOCK MULTI PURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES LIMITED R.1125, REPRESENTED BY PRESIDENT, WADAKKANCHERY P.O., THRISSUR 680 528 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. I.V. PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.17486 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of June, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner was appointed as a Gold Appraiser in the Society and Ext.P3 is the decision of the Managing Committee of the first respondent. The appointment was provisional and on daily wage basis. According to the petitioner, in the meanwhile, Ext.P5 circular was issued by the Registrar of the Co-operative Societies for regularization of the daily collection agents and Appraisers. It is stated that subsequently, by Ext.P9, a post of Appraiser was also sanctioned. Claiming the benefit of Exts.P5 and P9, petitioner filed Ext.P11 representation before the first respondent and the same has not been considered so far and as a result there of petitioner will continues on daily wage basis. It is in these circumstances the writ petition is filed. WP(c).No.17486/09 2 2. Although the main prayer sought for is a direction to the respondent to regularize the petitioner in terms of Ext.P5, still having regard to the fact that a decision on Ext.P11 is yet to be taken, I feel that the grievance of the petitioner will be redressed, if a direction is issued to consider the said representation. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P11 filed by the petitioner, in the light of Ext.P5 and P9, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.17486/09 3