IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.28100 of 2011 1. Saroj Yadav, 2. Manoj Yadav, 3. Mukesh Kumar Yadav, 4. Sheo Chand Yadav alias Shin Chand Yadav alias Shin Chal Yadav alias Sheochand Singh Yadav & 5. Vindhyachal Yadav alias Vindhachal Yadav, all sons of Shankar Yadav …Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar …OP ----------- 2/ 15.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3(x) of the of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Considering that there is direct allegation against the petitioner no.2 (Manoj Yadav) of having assaulted, I am not inclined to grant him anticipatory bail. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. With regard to rest of the petitioners, since there is no specific overt act, it is ordered that in the event of surrenders of the petitioners, namely, 1. Saroj Yadav, 3. Mukesh Kumar Yadav, 4. Sheo Chand Yadav alias Shin Chand Yadav alias Shin Chal Yadav alias Sheo Chand Singh Yadav and 5. Vindhyachal Yadav alias Vindhachal Yadav within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in connection with Bhabua P.S. Case No.199 of 2011, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, 2 Kaimur, Bhabua, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)