IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Appeal from Order No.9 of 2007. Appeal from Order No.9 of 2007. Appeal from Order No.9 of 2007. Mustin D. Shah ..Appellant versus Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Anr. ..Respondents Mr.Rahul Kadam i/b. Uday Warunjikar for the Appellant Smt.Geeta Joglekar for the Respondent No.1 B.M.C. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 27th Sept., 2007 Dated : 27th Sept., 2007 Dated : 27th Sept., 2007 P.C. 1. Heard learned advocate for the Appellant as well as the learned Advocate for the B.M.C. 2. From the perusal of the record and submission made before me it appears that the ad-interim relief is rejected to the Plaintiff and hence he filed the present A.O. He prays for status quo. 3. It is submitted that the Notice of Motion is fixed on 8.10.2007 for hearing. Under the circumstances, the parties to maintain status quo till 8.10.2007. -2- 4. The Trial Court to dispose of the Notice of Motion in any event before 15.10.2007. Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the disposal of the Notice of Motion. 5. A.O. disposed of accordingly. (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.) (S.R.Sathe, J.)