CW 8079/08 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.8079/2008 Smt. Sunita Yadav & (2) Ors Versus State & (3) Ors. Date of Order ::: 03/09/08 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Rajkumar Sharma, for petitioners Mr. Rajnish Gupta, for respondents Shri Rajnish Gupta accepts notice on behalf of respondents. It is a joint petition filed by petitioners seeking permission to participate in process for the post of Prabodhak in pursuance of advertisement dt.31/05/08. As alleged by Counsel for petitioners that few of petitioners are over- age and few of them have not completed five years continuous teaching experience, which are requisite conditions of eligibility under Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008 (“Rules, 2008”). Since petitioners have separate cause of action and as regards age, a coordinate Bench of this Court at principal seat Jodhpur in Jaipal Bishnoi Vs. State & Ors. (CWP-6109/08 & 48 cognate petitions dismissed vide order dt.02/09/08) observed ad infra: “In instant matters, the classification as pointed out is reasonable for the reasons given above CW 8079/08 //2// and there is nothing to show that the relaxation in maximum age limit granted to the persons serving with the educational projects such as Rajiv Gandhi Swarna Jayanati Pathshala, Shiksha Karmi Project, Lok Jumbish Project, Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan & district Primary Education Programme is without reason, thus, there is no unequal treatment.” Instant petition raises mis-joinder of facts & cause of action. In view whereof, if petitioners have any grievance other than age factor, will be free to file writ petition afresh. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed with liberty (supra). (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p2/8079CW08ag0309ds.doc