1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 553 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO. 3811 OF 1994 Deepak Rajendra Jain & Anr. ....Plaintiffs Versus Nalin Harishchandra Muranjan & Ors. ....Defendants Mr. R. A. Shah i/b. M/s. Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co., Advocates for the Plaintiffs. Mr. A. M. Talreja, Advocate for Defendant No.6. Mr. N. K. Mudnaney, Advocate for Defendant No. 7 & 9. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : 5th FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C. : The Defendant Nos. 6(a) to 6(e), Plaintiff Nos. 1 & 2 and Defendant Nos. 7 and 9 have settled their dispute amicably out of court and tendered Consent Terms. 2. Under the Consent Terms, the chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Under clause (3) of the Consent Terms, the Plaintiffs are obliged to enter into usual agreement for sale with Defendant Nos. 6(a) to 6(e) in respect of Flat No. G-001 & B-102. The Consent Terms are signed by Plaintiff Nos. 1 & 2, Defendant Nos. 6(c) for himself and as a Constituted Attorney of Defendant Nos. 6 (a) (b) (d) and (e), their respective 2 Counsel and on behalf of Defendant Nos. 7 & 9, the Consent Terms are signed by their Counsel. A copy of power of authority is already filed on the record of the suit. The Defendant No.9 by filing an affidavit in this proceeding has rendered “No Objection” to transfer the above flat directly by the Plaintiffs to Defendant Nos. 6(a) to 6(e). The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked as Exhibit "X" for identification. The Plaintiff No.1 and Defendant No. 6(c) are present before the Court and admit the contents of the Consent Terms. Order, in terms of Consent Terms. The Chamber Summons is disposed of, in terms of the Consent Terms. Sd/- (R. V. MORE, J.)