K) @f V9??? Simg’e*3enef§ THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA .P. S No. IN - ' . PETITIONER EHhat Ram Sahu S/o. Paras Ram Sahu, aged about — 41 year, R/o. — Matiya, Block — Kasdol, Distt. a Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENDS 1, x”"'State ofChhaaisgarh, Through : Secretary School Education Department, H D.K.s. Bhavaa, Raip'ur (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer, Baloda Bazar, District — Raipur “(C.G.) 3. The ChiefExecutiye Officer, Jila Panchayat (Shiskha) KaiPW 4. ‘ ' The Block Education Officer KasdolJDistt. Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ,,,, ,ai\‘ SPUR W . .. ' \ m \l"'?C$) H\tg »mm (Wu) mmm B: HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRI INKER DIWAKER 19.8.2009 Shri Vineet Kumar Fandey, Shri U.N.S.Deo, G.A. for the At the outset, counsel for t e petitioner wants to Withdraw this petition with liberty to fie representation against the impugned transfer order dated 6 8.2009 passed by respondent No3. um mrzoo j WW wW aaaw'ranaméw unsel for the petitioner. ‘tate. He however submits that direction may be issued for deciding the representation so mad in accordance with law. Contention of counsel for State is that let the petitioner make a representation and the e is decided by the respondent No3 in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is missed as Withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. In the e ntuality' of filing any such representation by the petitioner b fore the authorities concerned Within a period of ten days from t e date of receipt of the copy of this order, the same is expected t be decided within a period of three weeks from the date of its rec ipt. Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker V ‘ Judge S o ” t s 's