1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1061 OF 2009, CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1062 OF 2009, CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1063 OF 2009, CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1064 OF 2009, CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1065 OF 2009, CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1066 OF 2009, CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1067 OF 2009, CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1068 OF 2009, CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1069 OF 2009, CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1070 OF 2009 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.A.P.Mundargi Sr.Advocate i/b Mr.Amol Patankar for the applicant Mr.Subhas Jha with Yashpal Thakar i/b Paras Kuhad & Associates for respondent no.1. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : June 23,2009 P.C.: 1 Heard learned senior counsel for the applicants. He has fairly invited my attention to the order passed by this court dated 12 th June 2008 in Criminal application nos.659 and 670 of 2008 which were filed by the co-accused. His submission is that a different view is required to be taken in these applications which are filed by the other accused. 2 2 There is no difference between the case of the applicants in these applications and the case made out by the applicants in criminal Application nos.659 to 670 of 2008. They stand on the same footing. In view of the reasons recorded by this court in Judgment dated 12 th June 2008 in Criminal Application No.659 of 2008 to Criminal Application no.670 of 2008, a different view cannot be taken. Hence, for the reasons recorded in the said order, applications are rejected. JUDGE