I f ' - (Ar X (f W‘ FIRST APPEAL UNDER SECTION 19, FAMILY COURTS ACT,1984 Appellant 5Hiisband {Shri Abhay Kumar Bose S/o Shri Vijay Kumar {l Bose, aged about 41 years, Administrative Officer In United India Insurance C0. Ltd., R/o Veer Savarkar Nagar, LIG-248, Heerapur Colony, Post Amanaka, Raipur (C.G.) Vs. Respondent (Wife ' int.Vani Bose W/o Shri Abhay Kumar Bose, aged about 32 years, House-Wife, R/o Shivanand Nagar, Sector-3, Shrinagar Raipur (C.G.) \QX’ " M XI-HC—78 mw,m,fww Wm .?&CM;..%:}H‘” g1 200; WW(W) mwm 7 WWW WWEWWA matWm %af%1¢an%sT DB:- Hon’ble Shri L.c. Bhaduo, Ag. C.J. & Hon’ble Shri sunil’ Kumar Sinha, J. 6-2-2007:- Shri Sanjay Shyam Agr'awal, counsel for the appellant. Heard on admission. This appeai is directed against the order dated 30-1 2-2006 passed by the 1" Additional Principa Judge, Famiiy Court, Raipur in Civil Suit No.246-A/2005. lt appears that an ap ication under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act was tiled by res ondent herein before the Family Court in which Family Court passed a order for grant of permanent alimony in sum of Rs.3,000/-‘ to the re pondent wife against whom a decree of divorce was passed in Civil S it at the instance of the appellant herein. lt has come ln‘ para-2 of the jud ment of the Family Court that in Civil Suit No.84-A/2005 on 10-8-2005 a ecree of divorce was passed. lt has also come in the said paragraph th tduring the course of pendency of the civil suit, as referred to above, a su of Rs.1 ,OOOI- was granted as an amount of interim maintenance to the wife in the said proceedings. Apart from that, a sum of Rs.500/- was also granted to her‘in proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C.. ln this m nner, admittedly, wife was given a sum of Rs.1500/-, as an amount of i terim maintenance, during the course of aforesaid proceeding. After completion of the aid proceeding, this application was med by the wife under Section 25 f the aforesaid act for grant of permanent alimony. The wife had taken t e ground that she was unable to maintain herself, therefore, some perma ent alimony should be fixed. ln the said application, the husband had t ken the ground that she is an educated l XI—HC-78 HW,W§,W WW(W) WPMN a zoo;— WWW WWW mmmm L lady, who was doing some priv ate job, was also doing tuition and teaching work etc. and was earning a sum of Rs.5,000/-, therefore, her appiication should‘be dismissed. The hu receiving a substantive amo nt of Rs.7,000/- would not bewpossible for him provide amount the wife. The Family Court a band had also taken the ground that he is per month, therefore, it of permanent alimony to r considering the facts and circumstances of the case,‘ ha? aWarded a su of Rs.3,000/- per Learned~Presiding Judg of the Family Court afte'r considering the evidence of both the parties r ached to the conclusion that according to pay certificate, in-oome of the appellant herein holding so, awarded a sum o alimony to the respondent herein. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly, considering the income derived by the Family Court, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the appellant, we are of the considered opinion that ant herein is not in any manner excessive In the opinion of this Court, this appeal is without merit and the same is dismissed at the motion stage, without notice to the other side. \," L.C.Bhadoo Judge month.. was Rs.27,138.44/—,and ‘ Rs.3,000/-, as an amount of permanent amount granted to the respondi or on higher side, which needs interference by this Court. ' Sd/- g ~\7# i“ Sci/- j sunii Kumar Sinha Judge W/ P.T.O. mmawm éaWanétT