IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2010 / 26TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 25772 of 2010(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- ANILKUMAR.K.A,LINEMAN GR-I, ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT,THRISSUR CORPORATION, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SMT.K.P.GEETHA MANI SMT.ASWATHI APPUKUTTAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE THRISSUR CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,CORPORATION OFFICE,THRISSUR. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS, SC, THRISSUR CORPN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 25772 OF 2010 (V) ===================== Dated this the 17th day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a Lineman Grade I in the Trichur Corporation. According to him, in Ext.P1 proceedings of the 1st respondent, he has been shown as one eligible to be promoted as Overseer with retrospective effect. However, when consequential order was passed by the 1st respondent as per Ext.P2, although many of his juniors and persons who are not included in Ext.P1 were ordered to be promoted, petitioner is omitted from the said order of promotion. Aggrieved by this order, he has filed Ext.P3 representation before the 1st respondent and complains that orders have not been passed on the said representation either. It is with this grievance, the writ petition is filed. 2. Having regard to the nature of the grievance that is highlighted and also taking note of the fact that Ext.P3 representation is dated 16th of April, 2010, I direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of WPC No. 25772/10 :2 : production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp