» 0_ f- f<50 INTHEHlGH COURT OFJUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH ATBILA8PUR W.P.fS) ^,'S'?' / 2007 Petitioner Smt.Neeta Cruijhar W/o Deo Pratap Guq'har, .-<^<^ / , Agedabout34years, '-^^' ^•^ \' '.'>?•• y Respondents Versus ^ 1. ^ .^y 'o" . ^<^\ ^ ^2. /-3.; . 4. -s.- (' R/oVillage-Goutiyapara (Kharra), Block - Odgi, Tehsil - Surajpiu", Dist: Sargu]a.-(C.Q.) State of Chhattishgarh, Through The Secretaiy, Department of Women and Child Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G:) The CoUector (Women and ChUd DevelQpment), Sargtija-tG.Q.j The Project Ofdcer, Women and Child Development, Odgi, Dist : Sai^aja (C.G.) Kharra, Through - Sarpanch Kharra, Block - Odgi, Dist : Sarguja-(C.G.) Smt. Sunita W/o Shri Dharmpal yadav R/o Village Kharra, Tehsil - Surajpur, Dist: Sarguja-(C.G.) .*"•• WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION QP INDIA FOR ISSUANCEOE WRFnNTHgNATURE OFMANIMMUSi CERTIORARI, FROHIBmON EIC. T VSfS KEeH COURT OF eHHATTES6ARH AT BIl.ASPUR Writ Petition (5) No. 659 of 2007 Petitioner Smt. Neeta Surjhcr •;^. Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh dothers Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. JusticeSotish K. ^gnihotri. Present: Mr. A.N. Pmdey, Advocate for the petitiorier. Ms. Suhito Jain,Panel L.miyer for theState/respondents No. lto3.'" , . /1. '..:.': : ^••:^ . '• .' ORDER • : -• • (Passed on 7"' t)ay of February, 20)7) The followina order of the Gourt was passed by Satish K. Agnihflitri, 3. 1. Learned counsel appeorjrg for the petitioner aAmits that the appointment of the respohdent ^k>. 5, on the post ofAnganbadi Worker, is contrcry to the provisions of Anganbcdi Scheme and the ndme of the respondent No. 5 in the select list isdown below at 5r. No. 57. The respondent No. &belongs toother«»ardand her fathensa ©ovemmentemployee. 2. Leornecl counselappecB'ing •for the petitioner furthef submits thoit the petitioner belon9S to OBC and living in the Sc evilla9e Panchayat Wn<sva, Block-Odgi, Distirct-Sat'9i.yaand also belorgs to the family livin9 below the poverty line (BPL). The petitioner possesses 8 Class examination Certificate. ^ ' • ' . . •'. . ' • • ' ' ' •'.".'• 2. Be that as it mcy, in the facts and circumstcalces of the case, the Collector, Sorgiya is directed to look into the allegations mode by the petitioner and pass appropriate order in accor'dance With An9onbadi Scheme andlaw. - ;' '':'.'•. .':- : :'~; '• ' ::'.-: 3. TI'iewritpetitionisocCordingty disposett of.No order os+ocosts. ^Sd/-, •Satislt^gl 'Judgej