'TP ^ [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. N0AS' Lj ? /_2004 PETITIONERS ^ _„ ..QTT'SSWH y, C"" """ ' .^a' H16H -p R,,co^;' . At Sfei-.^ By Siir" ^t........ .< Fitiiia '"A^ ^.••'^:'' .^%s ^•"^^ \ ^^^' ^^ ^-^""^ .•> <<•' RESPQNDENTS e\e>V.to 1. Smt. Madhuri Tirkey W/o.Shri Rajesh Karihar, aged about 32 years, Rural Agriculture Extension Officer, Mungeli. R/ o Village Hirrimines, Qr. No. 11 J 100 Unit, Distt. Bilaspur [C.G.]. 2. Bhanupratap Koshley, S/o. Shri Jhumuk Lal, aged about 41 years, Rural Agriculture Extension Officer, R/o. Mungeli, Distt. Bilaspur [C.G.] 3. O.K. Koshley S/o. Raghavram Koshley, aged about 48 years, Rural Agriculture Extension Officer, Mungeli, R/o. Mungeli, Distt. Bilaspur [C.G.]. VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Agriculture Departanent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur [C.G.] 2. Deputy Director, Agriculture, Bilaspur [C.G.] PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. THE ^xre, t '» Kof •..[,:•!; : .^!. ^ •P-.^Wss^l f-^°^ W^""""'"""""'""'~^~"*tt: - MW '. 13-9-2004 ,petrtion|rs ShriJ.K. Shasfri.'AdvoGatefbrftfe Shri U.N.S. Deo, Govt. Advocat^ Heard. : •,' Leamed counsel for the transfer. Counsel fiirfher submits that s| concemed, fheir case is distinguishabl( submits that so far as petitioners No. { withdrawthspetition.>jjitt»UW\y-5t^\(<^1 So far as the 'petitioners no. 2 aj dismissed as withdrawnt>j\1 So far as petitioner no. 1 is bas beea transferred .on her own ^iiever opted^fbr voluntary transfer. He| iSae petitioner •NJ6. 1 may be given represeiltation hefore ths •competent 4 shall be considered on its o\vn merits in Haviag considered arid without ofthe case, inllte opuuonofthis Cou4, direction is given to the^petitioner No. raisiug hei- grievances Before the along with a copy ofthe.petitioa andfh| representation bemg filed, the-competei|t .decide...the-same.-xm-.ifc5i.Qwn.iuerits..ji:t requ^t. adt petitiaiers. forthe State. submits thatthe matter relatesto |) far as petitioners no. 2 and 3 are 1 fi-om petitioner no. 1 . He farther g and 3 are concemed, he wants to 4^. |id 3 are concemed, their petition is con<temed i<{emed, Shri Shastri subnuts that she ^L He further submits that sbfijhas |further. submits that fbr fheipresent opportunity of filing fhe detailed (ithority ofithe respondents; which tceordance with law. • , ^spressing any opinion pn the fflerits 4, ends ofjustice will |be served |if a {I to rnake a detailed jrepresenfatiori authority of tUe respondents I order, wifhin 10 days, and on such. ;i|t authority ofthe responderits;sllaU L,-acc£!KlaBGe..!KittLJa.SK.i.2&.fiarb!,-as;. comtetent At lli llil :llil ;UIl ..* tl .; I" •ilU! !il:fci-.i~H,.i.1-1f.-^f-^n^^i •S-WS-Si F-SS ^s. 1;61: NBii Sfr<*i efts 'Wf-'wwSf, SiB«f'w,Rwi^p. *ii*tetis«wwu^'^b-^S^l/^00^ w*ww • y' ;"^"""""""""""""5W .2NI 1IBS i'SSS8gS -.^^^sss •v^e^frf'rf^iw^i/fS^f^rffffi^^^ffff-^fs^ff^ffv'- ^?^^ —l- ^at'till the representation submitted by possible preferably within six we^ss finm fhe date of receipt of the | representatiofi: It is iurther directed fj the petitioner no. 1 is decided, she be It is made clearthat ifany gri^ lllowed to contmue. jvance still remains, the petitioner may avail fhe remedy available under the l^w, With fhe aforesaid observatictis, this petition stands disposed ofat tliis staee. of. M.W.P. No. 2255/2004 andl Certified copy as per rules. IA. No. 5730/2004 also stand disposed Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge :«a Hffl