IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1175 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 1175 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 1175 OF 2009 Sachin Gajanan Patil ]... Petitioner Versus 1. Zilla Parishad, Raigad & 2 ors. ]... Respondents Mr. S.S. Pakale for the petitioner. Mr. C.G. Gavnekar for the respondent No.1. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.B. MHASE & S.B. MHASE & S.B. MHASE & D.B. D.B. D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. BHOSALE, JJ. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: DATED: DATED: 27TH JANUARY, 2009 27TH JANUARY, 2009 27TH JANUARY, 2009 P.C. : 1. We have perused Exhibit-D viz. the order by which the services of the petitioner have been terminated. We find that the documents have been manipulated. The petitioner’s Experience Certificate is manipulated to show that he is having more than three years experience. Further, even though the petitioner’s mother was in service, he has filed an Affidavit stating that she is not in service. This goes to show that in order to get compassionate appointment, the required documents have been manipulated as also false Affidavits have been filed. Compassionate appointment is not a matter of right in favour of the petitioner and, : 2 : therefore, we find that the termination order has been properly issued. 2. No interference is called for at the hands of this court. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, rejected. Sd/- Sd/- [D.B. [D.B. [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] BHOSALE, J.] BHOSALE, J.] [S.B. [S.B. [S.B. MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.]