IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 18TH AUGUST 2009 / 27TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 23653 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- V.V.JAYA,"DIVYA", W/O.RAJKUMAR, AGED 37 YEARS, T.C,13/20, ULLOOR, MEDICAL COLLEGE PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. MR. R.MANOJ RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE DITRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR(RR), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, SARC BRANCH, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 AND R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P.K. BABU R3 BY STANDING COUNSEL MR. K.K. CHANDRAN PILLAI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P. (C) No. 23653 of 2009 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 18th day of August, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner is aggrieved of Exts. P1 and P2 notices issued under the relevant provisions of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, at the instance of the 3rd respondent Bank. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the loan was availed by the petitioner for starting a 'Health Club' and it was being regularly repaid, finding out necessary funds by the petitioner and also by her husband, who was conducting a Travel and Tourism Institute. Subsequently, the matrimonial relationship of the petitioner got strained and hence the petitioner could not effect the repayments on time. The learned counsel further submits that, the petitioner has already projected her grievance before the first respondent by filing Ext.P3 representation and that the petitioner will be satisfied, if the said representation is directed to be considered and disposed of on merits. 2. Heard the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent. 3. After considering the facts and circumstances, the first respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 representation preferred by the petitioner, of course after giving WP (C) No. 23653 of 2009 : 2 : an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that, till such orders are passed on Ext.P3, the coercive proceedings, stated as being pursued against the petitioner, shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd