IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.3562 of 2006 Between: Janab Shaikh Rahim, S/o.Shaikh Mastan, R/o.Vizianagaram. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P.State Wakf Board, rep by its Executive Officer, Haj House, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 Inspector Auditor Wakfs, Vizianagaram District. 3 Janab Sk.Mustafa, S/o.Sk.Samad, Kotlamadappa Veedhi, Vizianagaram. 4 Jade Tulasirao, S/o.Boddoji Rao, Kodivari Galli, Vizianagaram. 5 Janab Pathan Samshuddin, S/o.Pathan Suleman Khan, Babu Metta, Vizianagaram. 6 Robbi Sombabu, S/o.Babjirao, Khadernagar, R/o.Vizianagaram. 7 Janab Rahmatulla Sharief, S/o.Rahman Sharief, Mustan Street, Vizianagaram. 8 Janab Syed Asadullah Shareef, S/o.Mehboob Shareef, Vuda Colony, Vizianagaram. 9 Janab Syed Ibrahim, S/o.Sayyed Ahmed, Abad Street, Vizianagaram. 10 Janab Syed Yonus, S/o.Sayyed Meer, Maharanipet, Vizianagaram. 11 Janab Mohd.Chotu, S/o.Ishaq, Arakalagadda Veedhi, Vizianagaram. 12 Janab Syed Ibrahim, S/o.Sayyed Basha, Abad Street, Vizianagaram. 13 Janab Ismail Khan, S/o.Shamsheed Khan, Kotlamadappa Street, Vizianagaram. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings No.18/VZM/K/2003, dt.16-02-2006 issued by the first respondent, as illegal and ultra vires to the provisions of Articles 14 of the Constitution of India and also the mandatory provisions of the Wakf Act, 1955, besides the Doctrine of Principles of Natural Justice declaring that the Committee is entitled to continue up to 27-06-2007 and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.S.R.ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondents 1 and 2: MR.SUBHANI.S.M. Counsel for the Respondents 3 to 13: MR.B.V.S.SIVARAM The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.3562 of 2006 ORDER: Mr.P.Girish, learned Advocate, representing Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, learned Counsel for petitioner, submits that writ petition has become infructuous. The same is recorded. The writ petition is therefore dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ (V.V.S.RAO,J) December 17, 2008. YS