- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.191 OF 2005 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST)NO. 18528 OF 2005 Mr.Krishnakant Mulshankar Vyas ..Applicant Vs. Ms.Reena Krishnakant Vyas @ Reena @ Dolly Shaw and Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr. Madhav Jamdar Advocate for Applicant Ms. Shobha Gopal for Respondents ... CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 22,2005 DATE : NOVEMBER 22,2005 DATE : NOVEMBER 22,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and learned counsel for the Respondents. By this Civil Application, the Applicant is seeking condonation of 26 days’ delay. For the reasons stated in the said Application, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide. Hence, Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) only. [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]