: 1 : 6597-11-wp=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6597 OF 2011 Smt. Chhabutai Rajaram Gatade & Anr. .. Petitioners v/s. Sitaram Manyappa Teli (Gatade) .. Respondent ......... Mr. Manoj Kadam h/f Pratap Patil for the petitioners Mr. Drupad Patil for the respondent ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER,2011. P.C. : 1. The respondent herein filed R.C. Suit No.66 of 2010 in the Court of learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Panhala so as to seek order of injunction restraining the petitioner and co­defendant Chandrakant Gatade from interfering with the alleged possession of the respondent. Exh.50 application for appropriate injunction was rejected. 2. On the basis of the application below Exh.50, it is the case of the petitioner that a portion of the suit land was cultivated by the petitioner : 2 : 6597-11-wp=.sxw and sugarcane crop was grown. According to the petitioners the respondent has cultivated sugarcane crop standing in the suit land and has deposited the same to the sugarcane factory named in the application and that the said sugar factory is likely to credit the necessary proceeds of the sugarcane to the respondent. 3. By this application, it was prayed that the said credit should not be given and in terms the respondent should not get the purchase price of the said sugarcane. This application has been rejected by order dated 16th March, 2011. After having gone through the entire record and application at Exh.50 is out of the scope of the present suit. If at all, it is the case of the petitioner that the respondent has deposited with the sugar factory crop raised by the respondent, it will be open for the respondent to adopt appropriate remedies so as to protect his interest. In the aforesaid observations, petition is dismissed in the aforesaid terms. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)