WW 3mm au‘a‘x ¢a % 3’20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION 1C) No. S59 1/] $ [2011 Dr. Naresh Katiyaral, S/o Shri Ashok Chand Katiyara, Aged about 29 years, R/o Gudakhu Line, Rajnandgaon, District— Rajnandgaon (CG) Dr. Dheeeraj Bhawanani, S/o Bhakatrai Bhawanani, Aged about 28 years, R/o Deépak Nagar, District — Durg(CG) Dr. Tripty Naik, S/o Shri P.R Naik, Aged about 28 years, R/o 8'25 Priyadarshani Nagar Ring Rd- 01l, Raipur, District — Raipur (CG) Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Medical Education‘ DKS Bhawan, Mantraiaya. Raipur (CG) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Health Services, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) Director Medical Education, Directorate of Medical Education, Raipur (CG) Director of Health Services, Directorate of Medical Education, Raipur (CG) Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial Medical College, Raipur, District ~ Raipur (CG) Petitioners 7Q @ Respondents Gowri HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.5948 OF 2011 PETITIONERS Dr. Naresh Katiyaral & others Versu s RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General for the State. ORDER (Passed on this 30‘ day of September, 201 1) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Dr. Mahaveer Prasad Agarwal & Others v. State of Chhattisgarh & Othersl, thus same order may be passed in this case also. On a query asto whether any representation enclosing copy of the order passed by this Court in Dr. Mahaveer Prasad Agarwa/ (supra) has been made to the competent authority‘ {earned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that oral request has been made, but no request in writing has been made. In view of the above, the petitioner may make a representation to the authorities concerned in the light of the decision of this Court rendered in Dr. Mahaveer Prasad Agarwal (supra) and there is no reason why the authorities will not comply with the order passed in other case, as the issue is one and the same. Even learned counsel appearing for the State also fairly submits that the issue involved in the case on hand is similarto that of Dr. Mahaveer Prasad Agarwa/ (supra). Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. MW// A _,..,,, '. v/s‘ Sdl— 1 WP (C) No.4671 of 2011 (decided on 16-8-2011)