1 wp808.93 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 808 OF 1993 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. A.S. Goelgaonkar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.V. Kurundkar, Addl. G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 4. Mr. A.S. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 and 3. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 3rd MAY, 2011 By separate orders passed today in Civil Application no. 5816 of 2011, Writ Petition is restored back to the file. With consent of parties, the Petition is taken up. 2. Advocate Mr. Golegaonkar and Advocate Mr. Deshpande have filed a pursis signed by respective clients. Learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3 however, pointed out that the appropriate resolutions are passed by the respondent nos. 2 and 3 and its photostat copies are annexed. 3. In view of joint statement, pursis is taken on record and is marked as `X' for identification. 2 wp808.93 4. Learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 4 has contended that the Government is not aware of any such compromise and is not party to it. It is apparent that no obligation either financially or otherwise is cast upon the respondent no.1-State Government by these compromise. The State Government or its Education Officer are free to take cognizance in accordance with law of any such compromise. 5. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of by making Rule absolute in terms of pursis. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE gas/wp808.93