IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Appeal No.122 of 2010 Smt. Punshpa W/o Parmanand Pathak Resident of Village-Sutera, Tehsil-Barakot District Champawat. ……Appellant Versus State of Uttarakhand and another .…Respondents Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. Sri Amish Tiwari, Advocate present for the appellant. Sri S.S. Adhikari, learned A.G.A. present for the respondent No.1. Heard. This appeal, preferred under section 372 Cr.P.C. (as amended vide Act No. 5 of 2009) is directed against judgment and order dated 01.05.2010 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Champawat in Sessions trial No.01 of 2009, whereby respondent No.2 Laxman Singh has been acquitted of the charge of offence punishable under sections 376, 452, 323, 504 IPC. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the impugned judgment and order passed by trial court, we do not find any error of law or that fact in appreciating the evidence on record. 2 As such it is not a fit case to be admitted. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed summarily. (Nirmal Yadav, J.) (P.C. Pant, J.) JKJ 07.09.2010