[1] Crim. Misc. Pet. 1086/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 1086/2009 SURENDRA SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. Date: 31.08.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. Suresh Dhenwal for Mr. Praveen Balwada, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sanjeev Mehla, Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr. D.S. Dhariwal, Advocate for the respondents. **** This criminal misc. petition under 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner seeking quashment of FIR NO. 09/2009 dated 12.01.2009, registered at Poilce Station Kotwali, Jhunjhunu for the offence under Sections 420, 406 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the complainant-respondent has initiated proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after giving notice to the petitioner and lodged the FIR also. The complainant cannot initiate parallel criminal proceedings with regard to the sale of truck, therefore, the FIR lodged against the petitioner deserves to be quashed and set aside. I have heard rival submissions of the respective parties and carefully gone through the contents of FIR. The petitioner is not able to show any cogent reason as to how the FIR lodged against the petitioner for the offence under Sections 420, 406 [2] Crim. Misc. Pet. 1086/2009 IPC, is false at its face value. Applying the ratio decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bhajan Lal, this is not such a case where any interference is required by this Court. No case for quashment of FIR is made out. Consequently, the criminal misc. petition fails and the same is hereby dismissed. The stay application also stands dismissed. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/