IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10013 of 2009 Upendra Ram s/o Late Ram Sakal Ram, r/o village – Dhepura, Panchayat – Lakshmipur, P.O. – Pandaul, P.S. – Sakari, District – Madhubani ………. ………. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The District Magistrate, Madhubani 4. The Executive Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authorities, Darbhanga ……….. Respondents ------ For the petitioner : Mr.Bimal Kr. Jha, Advocate For the respondents 1 to 3: Mr. Deepak Kumar, AC to GP XVI For the respondent no.4: Mr. Lalit Kishore, Advocate Mrs. Binita Singh, Advocate 4 10/9/2009 Heard Mr. Bimal Kr. Jha, counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Deepak Kumar, counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Mr. Lalit Kishore, counsel for the respondent no.4. The present petition has been filed in purported public interest claiming that a century old road is now being closed by the 4th respondent by constructing a boundary wall. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.4 stating that there is no such road as claimed by the petitioner within the land allotted to 2 respondent no.4. The present writ petition involves certain disputed question of facts and, therefore, in our view, it would be more appropriate for the petitioner to pursue any appropriate alternative remedy. It is said by the petitioner that a representation has been filed before the District Magistrate (respondent no.3). In the facts and circumstances of the case, we call upon the District Magistrate, Madhubani to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of. Neyaz/ (P.K. Misra, CJ.) (Anjana Prakash, J.)