IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 2533/2008 Decided on:19.6.2010 _____________________________________________ Dr. Sher Singh. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. R.D. Kaundal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). The petitioner has filed supplementary affidavit, as directed. In view of the detailed supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner, he is permitted to make a representation to the Principal Secretary (Health), Government of Himachal Pradesh for the redressal of his grievance within a period of one month from today. There shall be direction to the Principal Secretary (Health) to consider and decide the representation after its receipt in view of the averments contained in the supplementary affidavit and the-then existing rules governing the payment of TA claims within a period of ten weeks after the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 receipt of certified copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall also be heard in person by notifying the date to him by the Principal Secretary (Health). In the light of above, the petition is deposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 19.6.2010 *awasthi*