// IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITION(S) N0.^6 2^/2011 PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^^ ^%^s ^'/A^ .^^/<° .** ^'^ ^^••' MANBODH, Age about 62 Years, S/o Late Shri Sunder, Retired as Permanent Gangman, R/o Village - Post - Torena, Tahsil - Mainpur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 1. State of Chhatiisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department of Public Works, Mantralaya, D. K. S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Executive Engineer, P.W.D. Gariaband Sub-division (B&R), Gariaband, Dsitt-Raipur(C.G.) 3. Sub Divisional Officer (PWD) Gariaband Sub-division (B&R),r^lo-i Gariband, Distt: Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UN DER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. SV^V Vt k-U* wffan^i'anw B<1 Deefrti TSI '<<w\v<<i, ynly'Ko, f^diy^ .Lt^..^......<S6.A.L.Lt.L. *fi*iCTi ^tira?"""" """"""""" ""7" "'W^ 200 STI^T'T?^' ('jql^yt) t^nwafBa aii^r SB^i-lon!ble Shri Manindra Mohd 13-05-2011 vtas submitslthatthe permarjent 3ahu artd Shri Yogesh Pandey, couns^ Shri Sushii Dubey, copy. Leamed counsei for the peti| to pension because.the petitioner permanent Gangman. He pension of one, who is a decided in the case of MA. Hakirrl (W.P.(S) Noi.4135/04), Sone Sai and Jhunia Bai v. State of C.G. counsel for the petitioner submite| considered the claim of the petitionj Learned state counsel claim would be considered by the down by this Court in the case of Bai (supra). In view of the subm) would be proper to direct petitioner for grant of pension, in expeditiously. With the aforesaid for the peUtioner. Governilnent Advocate for the State on advance subrhits respoi|ident ^l<<Id<lll "WRlf tf 'fe^ ^ffl^R ^i'3ffipT3II^[ n Shrivastava. J. tioner submits that the petitioner is entitied appointed in a regular scale and was a issue with regard to entitlement of Gangman has been considered and v. State of Madhya Pradesh and others v. State ofC.G. (W.P.(s) No.3572/05 others (W.P.(S) No. 2884/09). Learned [that tte respondent authorities have not i^r in the light ofthe aforesaid decision. that the case of the petitioner and his ;ompetent authority in Uie iight of law iaid tfakim (supra), Sone Sai Sahu and Jhunia Issions made by learned State counsel, it No.2 to consider the ciaim of the tecordance with law and decide ttie same observatijans, the petition is finally disposed off. 5iAamndva ^ohan Sb"^tava Judge w