1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.92 OF 2009 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.824 OF 2009 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1640 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO.2013 OF 1992 Sitadevi S. Gupta ....Appellant V/s. Manmohan D. Laddha & Anr. ....Respondents Mr.J.P. Sen with Ms.Neeta Solanki i/b Kiran Jain & Co. for the Appellant. Mr.M.K. Ghelani i/b Law Charter for Respondent No.1. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 1ST JULY, 2009. P.C. :- 1. Heard Mr.Sen, the learned counsel for the Appellant/original Defendant. 2. By the impugned order dated 12.1.2009, the learned Single Judge has allowed Chamber Summons No.1640 of 2008, for amendment of the plaint. After perusal of the said order, we are satisfied that the said interlocutory order does not call for any interference in this Appeal and in case the final decree goes 2 against the Appellant, she is not estopped from raising the very same challenges which the Appellant had while opposing the Chamber Summons including the impugned order itself. 3. Hence the Appeal is dismissed. This order is without prejudice to the Appellant’s right to challenge the impugned order while challenging the decree. The Motion for interim reliefs does not survive and hence the same is accordingly disposed off. (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)