IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.968 of 2010 KAMESHWAR BAITHA SON OF JAGU BAITHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21/01/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 353, 307, 124A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently his named transpired during investigation but there was no recovery from his possession, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 25.3.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Fast Track Court No. I, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 264 of 2009 arising out of Rohtas P.S. Case No. 27 of 2005 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner and must be local since the petitioner is a resident of Jharkhand, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner.(ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court 2 below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)