THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.4516 OF 2007 DATED: 02-07-2007 BETWEEN Dr. Y. Nirmala Kumari, Reader in History Department, Indira Priyadarshini Government Degree College for Women, Nampally, Hyderabad. …PETITIONER AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Hyderabad and others. …RESPONDENTS ORDER: None appears for the petitioner. 2. Perused the averments made in the writ affidavit, counter affidavit and rejoinder. The allegation of the petitioner is that she is a reader in Indira Priyadarshini Government Degree College, Nampally, Hyderabad and the sixth respondent is the General Secretary of the Government Colleges Teachers’ Association, who did not like the appointment of the petitioner in the said College, therefore, he used to create all sorts of obstacles regarding the functioning of the petitioner and he used to harass the petitioner threatening with many challenges. Accordingly, the petitioner made representations dated 10.06.2005 and 02.11.2005 before the Commissioner of Collegiate Education against the sixth respondent. Even then as the activities of the sixth respondent could not be stopped, the petitioner was constrained to make a complaint, based on which, a case in Cr.No.204 of 2005 was registered under Sections 501 and 509 read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 on 04.12.2005. The said complaint was investigated and notice dated 13.12.2006 was issued by the Station House Officer, Begum Bazar Police Station referring the case as false and stated that if the petitioner wants to oppose, she may file a protest application before the concerned Magistrate. The petitioner questioned the said notice dated 13.12.2006 in this writ petition. 3. Counter has been filed stating that the Investigating Officer issued notices to the petitioner/complaint dated 10.12.2005, 15.05.2006 and 29.06.2006 requesting her to produce the documentary evidence as well as independent witnesses to support her allegations leveled against the sixth respondent. The petitioner failed to produce any witnesses or documentary evidence and except the petitioner, no other witness have supported her version, therefore, a final report has been filed. 4. As the final report has already been filed before the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad vide SR.No.1670 dated 14.03.2007, the only course open to the petitioner is to contest the said final report and take appropriate action under the relevant provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. I am of the opinion that there are no justifiable grounds to question the impugned notice dated 13.12.2006. The writ petition is misconceived and devoid of merits. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J July 2, 2007 DSK