IN THE HIGH COURT OF IUDICATU RE AT BILASPUR [CGJ Civil Revision No 1L5 /05 single Bench APPLICANT QEFENDANT t 'Guljai‘ Singh S/o Ram Das Aged- about 50 years R/O Aazad Nagar, Distt.- Bialspur [CG]. VERSUS , w C[VIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 READ WITH SEC.102 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1‘908 I“ iiiESPONDENT : PLAINTIFF (rk {:ICHsmtar S/f) Late Iaan Ke.sl:av ‘ I antar, Aged 92 years, res1dmt q b6 of Hantar Baada, Behind poliCa 3:: %‘Q\ line, Aazad Nagar, Bilaspur, $o,’ Q‘c’se:....... \e Ta'hsil and District— Bilaspur {CG} XLHC-zé i m amas ?! 0910u2006’ V Shn Séxxdeep Pate}; 60mg He’alxi cn‘admission. ‘ Vllth» Civil Judga, Class decree dated 08,102/0003 pa passt‘d a money decxa of thousand fem hundred) agamsA emd also allowod damages fm Rs 600/ (Rupeos 51x hundrad} ;e.1 foe-the apolican ii, Bilaspur v1de 111dgment and used m Cxvd Sm? No 4 Bg9001 Rs 17 400[- (Rupees Seventeen e, applicant] defendant Gullax 9mg a1 13/03/2001 to 001 @ Bemg aggneved w1t May, per month apphcant Guyar Smgh filed an ’ the. sald: judgment and decree, Vlde unpugned mdgment 65 demee V Civil, Apeeel No.2-m‘20cé partly d a decree of Rs 14 800i- (Ruoees l fourteen thousand e1ght hunmed) agamst the apphcaxltvGuhar ‘ Smgh ‘ apphcant (3111323 Smgh has pre After due apyrecxatlon, _ for . unauthorized . ’ thereafter , Appeal arid Lthe appellate Court ._ dated 3110312005 passed m allowed the appeal arid passe Belna aggneved w1th tl‘at nnpugned judgment and decree, th the Courts below held that the i apphcemt Guljar Qnwh was ten mt of noe—apeheant I C Hantzu on a monthly rent of R3400] (Rt pees F0111 hundred) and therefore, ., trial Court for March,v, 1998 to September, 1099 allowed rent O ' ' R3400]; >‘(Ruyees R’Four hundred) for mneteen months and occupatlon allowed damages @ Rs.600] - (Rupees Six hundred) per montlw accnrdm gly decreed x/w s we we L/‘ t i z rred thus remsmn t. h h . . ‘x‘x-aC—n' z 5 WW QR, MO, 115/ W ‘ :L ~ ww‘ W 2M mmi§wm [mgwawm V $amam l ma suit [Ammllaté Court instead cf’allcwing dalilages @ Rs.60¢] - . {Ru'pe‘es{ sax ‘ lumdred) allow Bcth the Courts below' 6 cmlciumnt miding§ mgai‘dirlg x mnancy, alld rate of rent L ‘ allowed the appeal and dmcted naymént @ RS 400! {Rupees Four ' hundred) p61 month whlch wa mm and damageé @ RS400;- L fRupet-s fom hundmd) pt‘r mo 7 diAppellatE'CQurt correéfly partly e " 7’ lent ‘of the ‘acCOmmmlation. In my oplmom no mtel 1€nc€ m callad for therefora the ' rewsmn ls summanly habls t be dlsmlssed and 1s accordingly ‘ dxsimssed / l 11‘ thE hgh‘ of abevs or er IA No 24?8!2005 for urgen A heaimg stands dlsposed of Vuay Kumar Shnvastava Judge ,,,, z“ .,,.. l Sd/— V a ‘ n a V s e t .