IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2011 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 14174 of 2011(V) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- JULIE JOSE KIZHAKOODAN, W/O.FRANCIS XAVIER, ARAKKAL HOUSE, VENMENAD, P.O.PAVARATTY, 680507, THRISSUR DISTRICT (LPSA, ST.THOMAS LPS, ARTHAT, THRISSUR DISTRICT). BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-14. 3. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680506. 4. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680503. 5. CORPORATE MANAGER, CORPORATE EDUCATION AGENCY (ARCH DIOCESE OF THRISSUR), BISHOP HOUSE, THRISSUR-680001. BY SMT.RANI DIOTHIMA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.14174 OF 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of May, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as Lower Primary School Assistant in St.Thomas LPS, Arthat in Thrissur District under the 5th respondent Educational Agency. The approval of the appointment was rejected by the Educational Officer as per Ext.P1 for the reason that the claims of two persons under Rule 51B have not been considered by the Manager. Even though an appeal was filed by the Manager against Ext.P1, that was rejected as per Ext.P2. Later a revision petition was filed before the 2nd respondent and the same was also rejected as evident from Ext.P3. 2. The 5th respondent filed a revision petition against Ext.P3 as per Ext.P4 dated 13.05.2005. It is pointed out that the revision petition has not been disposed of so far. It is also pointed out that with regard to the claim of Smt.Reena V.J, the same has been found against her in another proceedings. Ext.P5 W.P.(C) No.14174/2011 2 is said to be a reminder forwarded by the Manager. Since Ext.P4 revision petition is of the year 2005, there will be a direction to the Government to take a decision on the same, after hearing the petitioner, Manager and any other affected parties, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will forward a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of this judgment for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp True Copy P.A. to Judge.