C/F’Zo'ak @ IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.] WP. (S) No. glob 2011 PETITIONERS .......... ‘. Ghanshyam Singh Rai, aged 4O years, S/o Late Shri Rangoo Das, U.D.T., Boys Middle School, Khodri, Block Gaurella District Bilaspur (C.G.) Komal Prasad Mahilange, S/o Shri Gita Ram Mahilange, Aged about 4O years, Post~ Upper Division Teacher, Middle School, Jogisar, Block Gaurella, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : , 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through — Secretary Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer Bilaspur C.G. /3. Assistant Commissioner Bilaspur C.G. 4. Block Education Officer " Gourala WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA :- 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS:— As mentioned in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As mentioned in the cause title. (x/ w~ Ham w a mm Mw cm w v n murmur mt (x x «MMWWW*rMWmwwzmwwmmmwxmmvwsumaimmmmmwwwmwmwmwwxawtmwtwwwwmw\m “WWWWMWWEYKW’WWWWWWWMWWW1 w m 1 " HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA3PUR SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER wamxo. 6200/ 201 1 PETITIONERS Ghanshyam Singh Rai 8r. Others VCISUS RESPONDENTS State of C.G. 8r, Others Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the pet'lu'oners. Shri Pmveen Das, Dy. G.A. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (13.10.2011) Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are entitled for benefit of two advance increments on account of they having passed B.T.I. examination before their appoinmlent at their own cost. It is submitted that the issue involved in the present petition is no longer res integra and the same has been finally decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena Vs. state of M.P. as Ors. 2009 (unMPJR (SC) 59. It is further submitted that this Court has also taken a similar View in its order dated 6.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/ 2008. Counsel for the petitioners further submits that the order dated 29.4.2010 passed in Writ Appeal NO. 124/2009, wherein relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Ashe Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this Court in another Writ Appeal No. 87/2009, directions have been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21.9. 1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verincation of the facts pleaded in the petition. Counsel for the State submits that case of the petitioners would also be considered on the same lines. S'dw/l” Judge