HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. 3509/2000 PETmONERS 1. 4. 8. Vs. RESPONDENTS Savitri Rice Mill, a partiiership fii-m, through Partaer Shn Saatosh Kumar Agrawal, S/o, Prahlad Rai Agrawal, R/o. Sahdevpali, Raigarh, Madhya Pradesh Sliivam. Industdes, Through Proprietor Suryakant Agrawal, S/o. Saatosh Kum.ar Agrawal, R/o. GanoMgaaj, Raigarh Shiv Trading Conipaay, a Partaership finn/ Through Partaer Sunil KuDiar Gupta, S/o, Gopaldas Gupta, aged 28 years, R/o, Chhatmurah, Raigai'h Shankar Trading Compaay, a Partaership fina, Through Partner Arun Kuraar Gupta, S/o. Shri K.K.Gupta, aged 35 years, R/o, Palese Road, Raigarh, Madhya Pradesh Keshav paddy Processuig Conipaiiy, Through : Proprietor Natwarlal Gupta, S/o, Bhagirafhlal Gupta, aged 38 years, R/o, Chhatooiurali, Raigarh, Madhya Pradesh M/s. Muralidhar Gupta (Par Boitmg Unit) Through : Proprietor, Muralidhar Gupta, S/o. Bhagirafhilal Gupta, aged 41 years, R/o. Palese Road, Raigarh, Madhya Pradesh Durga Rice MiU., through Proprietor Radheshyaia Agrawal, S/o, Badridas Agrawal, aged 50 years, R/o, Sangitarai, Raigarh, Madhya Pradesh G.R.Par Boiliag Unit, Through: Proprietor Gopiram Agrawal, S/o, Badridas Agrawal, R/o. Sangitarai, Raigarh, Madhya Pradesh The State of Madhya Pradesh, Through fhe Secretary Food, Civil SuppUes aad Consunier Protection Departaient, VaUabh Bhawao., Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh The CoUector, Office of C/ollector, Raigarh, Madhya Pradesh -^' ^c 3. 4. The District Maiiager, Food Corporation of ludia, Raigarh, Madhya Pradesh Distdct Food Officer, Raigarh, Madhya Pradesh Suguna WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Aenihotri, J.l ShriB.D.Guru, counsel for fhe petitioners. Shri Vivek Sharaia, Paael Lawyer for the State, Shri B.RGupta, counsel for respondents No.3 & 4. CLRDER (Passed oa this 14th day ofNovember 2007) I.A.NO. 2809/2001 This is an application ffled by the respondents No.3 8& 4 wherein it is stated that the present petition has become infructuous as the notification issued by fhe State of Madhya Pradesh in relation to levy of rice has come to an end in the monfh of September 2000. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner does not want to controvert the same. Accordingly the petition is dismissed as having become iniructuous. _ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^?1