IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 21174 of 2002 Between: 1 Vankivolu Venkata Reddy, s/o. Late Narapareddy, R/o. Pokurupalli(V),Rapur(M). 2 Vankivolu Jayaramireddy, s/o. Late Narapareddy, R/o. Pokurupalli(V),Rapur(M). 3 Pillil Rangamma, W/o. LR of Late Narapareddy. R/o. Pokurupalli(V),Rapur(M). 4 Pillo Ramadevi, W/o. Rama Raghavareddy, R/o. Pokurupalli(V),Rapur(M). 5 Vankivolu Mangamma, S/o. Narapareddy, R/o. Pokurupalli(V),Rapur(M). 6 Vankivolu Subbaramireddy, s/o. Munireddy, R/o. Thanamcherla(V),Rapur(M). 7 Vankivolu Sundararami Reddy, s/o. Munireddy, R/o. Thanamcherla(V),Rapur(M). 8 Vankivolu Leelavatamma, W/o. Sundararrami Reddy, R/o. Thanamcherla(V),Rapur(M). 9 Vankivolu Ranga Reddy, S/o. Lakshminarasa Reddy, R/o. Thanamcherla(V),Rapur(M). 10 M.Rajeshwaramma, w/o. Pulla Reddy, R/o. Thanamcherla(V),Rapur(M). 11 Desu Rama Subba Reddy, S/o. Rami Reddy, R/o. Pokurupalli(V),Rapur(M). 12 Sundrapalli China Eswaraiah, S/o. Late Subbaiah, R/o. Kothakambhalapalli(V),Rapur(M). 13 Sundrapalli Jayaramaiah, S/o. Late Subbaiah, R/o. Kothakambhalapalli(V),Rapur(M). 14 Sundrapalli Papaiah, S/o. Late Subbaiah, R/o. Kothakambhalapalli(V),Rapur(M). 15 Sundrapalli Subrahamanyam, S/o. Late Subbaiah, R/o. Kothakambhalapalli(V),Rapur(M). 16 Vankivolu Narasimha Reddy, S/o. Penchala Reddy, R/o. Thanamcherla(V),Rapur(M). 17 Sanniboina Tirupathaiah, S/o. venkata Narsaiah, R/o. Utlapalem (V), Podalakur(M), Nellore Dist. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Special Collector, Land Acquisition ,Telugu Ganga Project, Nellore. 2 The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition ,Telugu Ganga Project, Nellore. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ , order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ if Mandamus under Art. 226 of the constitution of India declaring the action of the constitution of India , declaring the action of the respondent in not passing the order on the petitioners applications dt.14-7-2001 under section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act and not re-determining the amount of compensation payable to the petitioners in terms of the order dt.19-4-2001 in LAOPNo.58/1990 is arbitrary, illegal without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents to pass orders on the applications dated `14.6.2001 under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act and re-determine the amount of compensation payable to the petitioners in terms of the other dt.19-4-2001 in LAOP No.58/1990 on the file of the Principal Sr.Civil Judge, Gudur and pay the compensation; and to pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.CH.CKRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO :21174 of 2002 ORDER: This writ petition is of the year 2002. When the writ petition is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J DATE: 6th February, 2009 pnb