IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.573 of 2009 GULAB SAH, SON OF SRI LATE NASIB SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAM NAGAR, POLICE STATION PIPRA, DISTRICT SUPAUL…………………………………………………..PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, DARBHANGA 4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, SAHARSA 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SUPAUL 6. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SUPAUL SADAR, SUPAUL 7. THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER, POLICE STATION, PIPRA, SUPAUL 8. RABINDRA SAH, SON OF LATE MANGAN SAH 9. GIRENDRA SAH, SON OF LATE ADHIK LAL SAH, BOTH RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE RAM NAGAR, POLICE STATION PIPRA, DISTRICT SUPAUL………RESPONDENTS ----------- 2. 30.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Admittedly, the prayer made by the petitioner in this writ application has become infructuous as the police has already submitted charge sheet in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No.38 of 2008. Petitioner is now aggrieved by the order of the learned Magistrate by which he has accepted final form submitted by the police in respect of respondent nos. 8 and 9 without giving any opportunity to the petitioner i.e. informant in the matter. In the circumstances, petitioner, if - 2 - so advised, may file a fresh application against the order of the learned Magistrate. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with the aforesaid liberty. Permission is granted. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. B.T (J. N. Singh, J.)