IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29863 of 2009 1. VISHWANATH TRIGUN 2. Raj Baso Devi, W/o Vishwanath Trigun Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----- 3/ 14.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner no.1 is a retired Army Personnel objected the execution of process issued by a competent Court under Section 82 and 83 of Cr. P.C. The way in which he opposed the officials went there for execution of Court’s direction does not entitle him for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner no. 1 is rejected. So far as petitioner no.2 is concerned, she is wife of petitioner no.1. The prayer of the petitioner no.2 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Dinara (Manas) P.S. Case No. 252 of 2008 corresponding to G.R. No. 1573 of 2008, above named petitioner no.2 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Bikramganj, Rohtas subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. However, petitioner no.1 is directed to surrender before the Court below and pray for regular bail, which shall be decided on its own merits without being prejudiced by the present order. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)