CWP No.2371 of 2009 15.7.2009 Present: Mr. V.D. Khidtta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma and Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate Generals for the respondents. The petitioner has assailed conditions No.1 and 2 imposed vide Annexure P-5, dated 5.2.2000. We have analytically examined the conditions imposed vide Annexure P-5. The wholesome principle for imposition of the conditions is to get experienced teachers on contract basis. In other words, if these conditions had not been imposed, the teachers who have taught only for few months or days shall be eligible to be considered for appointment to the posts on contract basis. Accordingly, there is neither any arbitrariness, nor unreasonableness in the conditions imposed vide Annexure P-5, dated 5.2.2000. Moreover, the cause of action had arisen to the petitioners on 5.2.2000. There is unexplained delay in approaching this Court belatedly. The writ petition is liable to be dismissed on this ground as well. In view of observations made hereinabove, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. (Rajiv Sharma), J. July 15, 2009. (rkv)