HIQH COURT OP CHHATriSGARH. BILASPUR Wtit Petition 181 No. 1580 of 2005 (OriglnalAppUcatIon No.1283 of 19971 PETITIONBR RESPONDESNTS 2 3. Ralneesh Prasad Pathak son of Shri Jagdisli Prasad Pafhak, aged about 33 years, resident of near Mutkraj Hotel, Railway Statioa, Bilaspur (C.Gr). Versus State of M.P. (now Chhatdsgarh), Through ; Secretary, Department of School Education., D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.). Joiut Director, Education, Bflaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G). Distdct Educatioa Officer, Bflaspur, District Bikispur (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COB8TITOTIOM QF1MDIA. A.ppearMice: Shri Rakesh Pandey, couasel for the petitioner. Ku. Sunita Jaia, P.L. appears for the State/ respondents. ORAL ORDER (11.12.2007) SUNIL KXIJWAR SINHA, .I Heard finaUy with the consent of the pardes. Leamed counsel for the petitioner ai^ues that the petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on Adhoc basis by onler dated 1.12.1984. TIiis appointment was for a period of3 monffas or uatil further order, whichever is earUer He completed fhe tEnure of the first appointment order fhereafter bis semces were discontiuued and later on by auother order dated 18.9.1986 the petitioner was again appointed and fhis time also he contmued upto complete tenure of tfae order, but thereafier his semce was agaia discontmued aud tiU then his case has not been considercd. He submits that maay petitions were filed iu fhls regaid aad fhe S.A.T. as also High Coixrt of Madhya Pradesh has passed maay orders and ia these orders, it has been directed ftiat the petitioners shaU file a representation setting out their qualifications aad the ^..-.-' SLP._(SlNal5a)/2005 /^\ c^ "as.-as' respondents inay consider tbe same in accoiiiance with law aad give einployinent to the petitioners, if fhere is any vacancy and if necessaiy relax fhe age bar also. Learaed coiinsel for fhe petitioner subauts that similar order raay also be passed in thls petition aiid accordingly, fhis petition may also be disposed of. I have heard leamed couiisel for the pardes at length and have also perused the writ petition as also fhe conunon order passed by the High Court of M.P. in W.P.S. No.397 of 2004, W.P.S.No.399 of 2004, W.P(s) No.62/2004 aad W.P(S) No.6923 of 2002. In view of fhe above, this petition is disposed of with a directioii fhat if so advfaed, fhe petitioner may fUe a detailed representation before fhe concerued authority wifhia a period of 3 weeks fi-oia today settuig out his quaii&cation aud if such a representation is filed, the coiicemed authority raay consider the same ia accordaace with law aad give eaiployiaent to the peti.tioner, if fhcre is any vacaucy aad if necessaiy relax the age bar. With fhe above observations, fhis petition staads finally disposed of. acaspermles 1 SunU^rsinha Judge <(EC- '^sa'eifeiGte^u^^,_,