-8 ^ 8- i^l/Q5 IN THE STi.TE ASMBIST.R&TITE TRIBGSA.L A.T .rABA.I.Pra (M.P.S^ O.JL.SO^t^S.^ 1997 K. K .TIH&R I ,AGB5B &.B OBT 52 ?E».RS,S/0 SHRI S .B.TrWftE.r OCCUs TJ .D .I., 60W . HIGBES SEOOSB&R? scHooi.Ka.R.ri DISTTsAHBIiaPUR (M!P.}. .........tEPLIG&NT 8 -Versus- 1)STATE QF m.DKTA ESADESH; THROUGHsSECRET&RT DEPARTMEHT C? SGHOOI, EBHGA.TION VA.I.IABH BH&S&S,BHOPAX. 2),TOIHT BIRECTIOK .- POBLIC IffSTRUGTieS, St%GUJA(M..P.). 5)BY.DIREGTQa CF EDTCATIOS BISTT s&MBISilPUR(M.P.) . 4)PEIBCIPAI. , GOTO . BI5BER SgCOBBA.BT SG HOOL aaraE,s BRGIJ JA (M ,p . ) . .BBSPOaD^IS DET&ILS _®_APPtIC&TI.QB ^ Id I-9t:-22 an^i^r ftiwan^r 'S^^ +ifid .Ty'-r'arte 'S^ -^WM^, »fll<H'is, ['K'ii'yy ^ *<l*ICtTt()t|l^> ^n^r ira^? ^J.;v:.CS;ltv?.:...ls., ^I. 200 I^^T' 311^1 ^BHW ^fta SB : Hon'ble Shrl Manindra MohaA Shrivastava.«(. 05-01-2010 Whenthe matter was caiyd petittoner and the matter was pass^a appears for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Panel 1-awyer for the State/respondents. The instant petition was filed fact that he was not relieved. Vidd Tribunalwherein respondent No.3 Return has been filed bythe| that the petitioner has alreadysubm|tted No.4. It has also been stated that with on 2402-1998 and the petition In view ofthe above, the inst rendered infructuous. A copy of this (til^Id^l'i iTP:R?f ^ 'feT3t ^R^R ^3rf:OT 311^1 for hearing, none appeared for the over. Even in the second round, none |bythe petitioner aggrieved on account of order dated 27-01-1998 passed by the directed to pass suitable orders. WBS Irespondents in which it has been stated his joining jn the office of respondent (arder passal eariier has been complied has been rendered infructuous. (ant petittoh is dismissed as having been [irder be sent to the petitioner. M^""*"51"1""""' Judge [Tit^qfe^