IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15002 of 2011 VINOD YADAV @ RAM VINOD YADAV & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. It is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. It appears from perusal of the impugned order itself that the petitioner participated in trial and when the case was posted for argument, he jumped bail. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, namely, Vinod Yadav @ Ram Vinod Yadav and Nirash Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sessions Trial No. 125 of 1987 arising out of Singhiya P.S. Case No. 20 of 1985 to the satisfaction of Assistant Sessions Judge, Rosera, Samastipur. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that the case diary of the aforesaid case is missing from the court below and the learned Sessions Judge has already issued direction to the court below to obtain carbon copy of the case diary for disposal of the aforesaid case. Therefore, the concerned court should take effective steps in the light of observation/direction 2 given by the learned Sessions Judge in his order dated 28.03.2011 passed in B.P. No. 194 of 2011. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)