IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2010 / 24TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).NO. 22103 OF 2010(O) ---------------------------------------- OS.210/2010 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ATTINGAL .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ RAJENDRAN, S/O.RAGHAVAN, AGED 54 YEARS, NIKHIKL NIVAS, PANDAKASALA, CHIRAYINKEEZH POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.J.JAYAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- PARIKSHA BEEVI, D/O.DAVOOD RAVUTHAR, AGED 44 YEARS, KUNNUVILA HOUSE, (KOCHUKUNNUVILA HOUSE), ATTARAKONAM, MULLARAMCODE, KALLAMBALAM POST, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT PIN-695605. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J. ==================================== W.P(C) No.22103 of 2010 ==================================== Dated this the 15th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S. No.210 of 2010 of the court of learned Sub Judge, Attingal. He sued the respondent for specific performance of Ext.P2, agreement for sale and other reliefs and filed Ext.P3, application for an order of temporary injunction restraining respondent from alienating the property to anybody else. Learned Sub Judge ordered summons on Ext.P3, application returnable on 21.07.2010 and the suit was posted on 18.08.2010 for return of summons. Apprehension of petitioner is that in the meantime respondent might transfer the property to others inviting claims of third parties. 2. Even as per the statement of petitioner Ext.P3, application is now posted on 21.07.2010. If petitioner is apprehensive that respondent may transfer the property it is open to him to make a request before learned Sub Judge to pass appropriate interim orders as circumstances warranted. There is no reason why this Court should interfere in the matter at this \W.P(C) No.22103 of 2010 -: 2 :- stage. Writ Petition is closed. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. vsv