IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6085 of 2011 BHUTU MAHTO @ RAMESH MAHTO Son of Yadu Mahto, resident of village- Akhtiyarpur, P.S. Bikram, District- Patna. … Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.03.2011 Heard the counsel for the parties. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail for offence under Sections 504, 323, 448, 341, 354(a), 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, other Sections are bailable and the allegation is that the accused persons tried to compel the informant to take wine and on protest they entered into the house, assaulted and outrage the modesty of female inmates and further allegation is that they took away the gold earring and chain. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that allegation of theft is only ornamental and not specific against this petitioner. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of the petitioner, above named, is allowed. He, in the event of arrest or surrender, within four weeks, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 181 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, subject to the condition that he will make available himself to the police as and when required by the 2 police during investigation and in case charge sheet is submitted the petitioner should surrender before the Court below and pray for regular bail alongwith condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Ibrar/- ( Gopal Prasad, J.)