THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO C.R.P.No. 3393 of 2010 DATE: 02-02-2011 Between: Mohd. Arshad Ali Khan .. Petitioner And Smt.Fathima Siddiqua .. Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO C.R.P.No. 3393 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed alleging that E.P.No.68 of 1987 in O.S.No.566 of 1986 was filed and it appears that the said Execution Petition was dismissed in the year 1993 and for restoration of the said Execution Petition, an application was filed and it was numbered as E.A.(S.R.) No.2344 of 2010. The said application has returned with some objections and it was not represented within time. Thereafter, the application is said to have been filed under Section 148 of Civil Procedure Code to condone delay of 58 days in re-submitting the E.A. (S.R.) No.2344/2010 and the said application was numbered as E.A. (S.R.)No.3880 of 2010. It appears, on 07.07.2010 by an endorsement of the learned V Additional Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, it was noted, “how this petition is maintainable, explain”. The application is neither returned nor rejected. The revision petitioner has now filed this revision questioning the said order. 2. Evidently, the condonation of delay in re-presentation, a returned paper is a routine action, which has taken by the Court by exercising the power under Section 148 of Civil Procedure Code and such petitions are filed day-in and day-out and allowed by the Courts. If the Court has got any doubt, the application should be returned. But, however, it is not known as to how the original S.R. came to the hands of the petitioner, even without it being returned, and there is also no step passed by the lower Court on this application, whether rejecting or allowing the same. 3. Therefore, there is no order to be reviewed by this Court. The petitioner is at liberty to re-present the application before the lower Court and the lower Court shall determine the same in condonation of the delay, keeping in view of the grounds, which will not, evidently, affect the maintainability of the restoration petition. With the above observation, the revision petition is disposed of. ________________________ N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO, J 2nd February, 2011 Note: Issue cc within one week. B/o. MR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO C.R.P.No. 3393 of 2010 DATE: 02-02-2011 MR