1 caf4546 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4546 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1267 OF 2006 Ramharak Prasad Newoor Dhobi ...Applicant vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Rahul Rao i/b Mr.I.V.Rao for the applicant Mr.Vinod Mahadik for the respondent nos.1 and 2 Mr.R.M.Tiwari for respondent no.4 CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : MARCH 16,2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the fourth respondent. Ad-interim relief granted in terms of prayer clause (b) on 15 th February 2006 was operative only till 11 th November 2007. Thereafter, ad-interim relief has not been extended. By the aforesaid order, prayer (a) was already rejected. 2 Considering the fact that thereafter the applicant has not applied for extension of ad-interim relief and considering the statement of the fourth respondent in paragraph 3 of the reply which is tendered on record, as of today, there is no apprehension that any work of laying down cable or pipe lines etc, will be carried out on the applicant s property. 3 Hence, as of today, no case is made out for granting any interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a). If any cause of action arises in future, it will be open for the 2 caf4546 applicant to make a fresh application. 4 Subject to what is observed above, application is disposed of. JUDGE