IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8833 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.08.2011 Parveen Kumar . . .Petitioner Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This is an application for regular bail in which notice of motion was issued. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that charge was framed under Section 472 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) on 18.3.2011 but at the time of filing of the present bail application i.e. on 22.3.2011 this fact was not mentioned in the petition. He has now filed an application, i.e. CRM-43181 of 2011, to incorporate Section 472 IPC as well. In my view, the incorporation of Section 472 IPC would not be suffice as he has to make some averment also in the bail application as to why offence under Section 472 IPC is not made out. Hence, the present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file it afresh with better particulars. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) AUGUST 24, 2011 JUDGE Vivek