IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 41 OF 2008 MRS. PRABHAVATI PRABHAKAR NAIK ... Petitioner Versus MR. MOHANDAS BHIKU BHAT AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. E. Dias, Advocate for the Petitioner. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 25th January, 2008 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri Dias, the learned Counsel on behalf of the Petitioner. 2. Petitioner/plaintiff has already produced the certified copy of the plan which is at Exhibit 49. The original of the same was not produced by defendant no.5/DW2 on 2/12/2006, when the deposition of the said witness was recorded. It appears that subsequently an application was filed to recall defendant no.5/DW2 to produce the original plan which was annexed to his sale deed. The learned Civil Judge has disallowed the said application to recall defendant no.5/DW2 stating that he could not be recalled to produce the said document when he himself chose not to produce the same when he was examined as DW2. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, in my view, the view held by the learned trial Court cannot be said to be unreasonable for this Court to interfere with the sane in extraordinary jurisdiction. Petition, therefore, is dismissed in limine. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH