CR No.2769 of 2009 - 1 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.2769 of 2009 (O&M) Decided on: 31.08.2009 **** Hukam Chand . . . . Petitioner VS. Tek Chand Aggarwal . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Vikas Goel, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Rajan Bansal, Advocate for the respondent **** SURYA KANT J.(ORAL) This Revision petition is directed by the tenant whose application for additional evidence has been dismissed by the Rent Controller, Bathinda, vide the impugned order dated 7th April, 2009. Notice of motion was issued and in pursuance thereto, counsel for the parties have been heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner states at the bar that the additional evidence, to be brought on record, is a certified copy of the Court judgment only. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of evidence which the petitioner wants CR No.2769 of 2009 - 2 - to bring on record, I am of the considered view that mere production of certified copy of the Court judgment which is per se admissible would not delay the Court proceedings. Consequently, the revision petition is allowed; the order dated 07.04.2009 is hereby set aside to the extent that petitioner be allowed to lead additional evidence comprising of certified copy of the Court judgement only and for such purpose no oral evidence is required. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 31.08.2009 shonkar