IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12627 of 2011 MD. ALLAUDDIN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 04.05.2011 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 413, 414, 120B of the I.P.C. The accusation is of recovery of stolen Bolero vehicle. It is alleged that the vehicle was purchased by this petitioner with the partnership of one Jai Kumar Yadav. Jai Kumar Yadav who was in custody on the date of occurrence but the recovery has been made in front of the house of Jai Kumar Yadav. It is alleged that Jai Kumar Yadav purchased the vehicle in partnership of this petitioner. The owner book also suggests the name of this petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Moreover the petitioner disclaims the vehicle in question. Let learned Court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner keeping in view that recovery has not been made from the petitioner and petitioner has no criminal antecedent. With the observations made above, the application stands disposed off in connection with 2 Kumarkhand(Bhatni) P.S. Case No. 168 of 2010. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)