1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 5290 OF 2007 (Kalpana Narayanrao Chafle .v. Mahatma Jyotiba Fule Sanstha and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri R.N. Sen, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.R. Bhisikar, Advocate for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri Gopal Mishra, Advocate for the respondent No.3. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 02ND FEBRUARY, 2009. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. By this petition, the petitioner seeks direction against the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to seek approval from the respondent No.3 for the regular appointment of the petitioner for the period beginning from 01.07.1998. The petitioner further seeks direction against the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to make payment of salary to the petitioner for the period beginning from 01.07.1998. Perusal of the petition does not disclose that at any point of time the petitioner has made any representation to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 either to pay the salary or to seek approval for her appointment. In this factual background, Shri Sen, the 2 learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to make appropriate representation to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 and submits that the respondent Nos.1 and 2 be directed to decide the representation within a reasonable time. In view of the above, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to make the representation to respondent Nos.1 and 2. If any such representation is made within a period of four weeks, the respondent Nos.1 and 2 shall decide the same expeditiously and in any case within a period of six weeks on its own merit. Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.