:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.667 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2709 OF 2003 Paresh Ranjit Kapadia ..Plaintiffs. Vs. Meetas Garments Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ..Defendants. Ms.Parvati Kaushik i/b.Mr.B.S.Chandnani for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendants. CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. DATED: 24TH AUGUST, 2005 DATED: 24TH AUGUST, 2005 DATED: 24TH AUGUST, 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : The suit is filed to recover the amounts under a bill of exchange drawn by Defendant No.1 and accepted by Defendant No.2. 2. There is no reply to the Plaintiff’s Advocate’s notice of demand. There is no affidavit in reply. There is no defence to the suit. However, Defendant No.1 has been ordered to be wound up by an order of this Court. 3. The Summons for Judgment is not pressed against Defendant No.1. Liberty to the Plaintiffs to adopt appropriate proceedings against Defendant No.1 including taking out a fresh Summons for Judgment :2: against Defendant No.1, if necessary. 4. In the circumstances, the Summons for Judgement is made absolute against Defendant No.2. Refund as per rules.