IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13340 of 2009 RINKU PATEL Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is apprehending his arrest only for demand without any delivery which has been levelled due to differences took place in between the parties at the telephone booth that can never be justified the petitioner’s arrest at the moment. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 328 of 2005, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)