CRM -M No. 32109 of 2009 Darshana Kumari vs. State of Punjab Present: Mr. Vivek Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Mehar Deep Singh, DAG, Punjab. *** It is stated by learned DAG, on instructions from ASI Satnam Singh, that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for custodial interrogation. In the circumstances in my opinion no useful purpose would be furthered by having the petitioner taken in custody. In the circumstances interim order dated 16.11.2009 is made absolute subject to the conditions as envisaged in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C., up to the filing of the challan, whereafter the petitioner would be required to seek regular bail. Petition stands disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE December 23, 2009 sunita