CR No.5648 of 2008 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CR No.5648 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.09.2010 Rahul Kumar and another ....Petitioner Versus Ranjit Singh and others ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Ms. R.K. Thind, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarunveer Vashisht, Advocate for the respondent. ... Alok Singh, J.(Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 22.8.2008 passed by the Additional Civil Judge, Fatehabad, whereby application moved by the plaintiff under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC read with Order 6 rule 17 was allowed permitting the plaintiff to implead purchasers as co- defendants. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in view of sub- section (5) of Rule 10 Order 1 CPC, suit shall be deemed to have been CR No.5648 of 2008 2 instituted against the newly added defendants from the date service of summon is effected on the newly added defendants. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of Section 121 of the Limitation Act read with Order 1 Rule 10(5) CPC, suit is barred by limitation against the newly added defendants and for the reliefs sought by way of amendment. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the trial Court while deciding the suit shall also decide the question of limitation. Since the trial Court has exercised discretion by permitting impleadment of the purchasers from defendant No.4, I do not find any reason to interfere with the discretion exercised by the trial Court. However, it is directed that while deciding the suit, the trial Court shall also decide the question of limitation. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 27.09.2010 sk.