IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.93 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.656 OF 1989 Mohd. Mustafa Mohd. Akbar. Since deceased through L.R.s. ..Applicants. Vs. Shakil Fazal Madoo. ..Respondent. Mr.A.R. Shaikh for Applicants. Mr.P. Bhargude i/by A.V.Anturkar for Respondent. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 16th February, 2010 PC : 1 Heard both sides. 2 This is a civil application taken out by the original plaintiffs. In the civil application, they seek direction to the Taluka Inspector of Land Records to make certain demarcation to demarcate the portion of House No.111. Such a prayer cannot be granted in the second appeal which has been argued on the basis of the evidence recorded in the trial court. It may be stated that the TILR has prepared a plan and placed on record as per the order of the court dated 3.7.2008. Advocate for the appellants states that, in pursuance of the said order Superintendent of Land Records decided the matter pending before him and nothing remains to be decided by him. In this view of the matter, second prayer regarding fixing date of hearing is granted. It is seen that matter was earlier part heard before this court and was heard earlier. In the circumstances, add the second appeal to the final hearing board in the week commencing from 8.3.2010. Civil application is disposed off. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.)