DBSAW NO.1081/08. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.1081/2008. In S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4599/2008. Hanif Khan Vs. The Authorised Officer (Land Resumption) and Land Acquisition Officer and ors. Date of order:- September 29, 2008. PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NARAYAN ROY HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Alok Sharma for the appellant. Mr. Ajeet Bhandari, Mr. R.K. Mathur and Mr. K.K. Sharma for the respondents. ***** BY THE COURT :- Heard counsel for the parties. By the impugned-order, learned Single Judge of this Court had directed the revenue authorities to decide the application/claim of the writ-petitioner under Section 90B of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 (for short, “Act of 1956”) for the lands bearing Khasra Nos.34 to 37, 39 to 45 55, 59 to 66 and 56, 57, 67 to 69, 71 to 73 in village Belaka, Tehsil & District, Alwar. DBSAW NO.1081/08. 2 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the learned Single Judge of this court could not have issued this order without hearing the proper parties. Appellant was not a party in the writ application however, it is submitted by the learned counsel that in case any decision is rendered by the revenue authorities in the proceedings under Section 90B of the Act of 1956, that may be prejudicial to his interest. Learned counsel, therefore, submitted that the revenue authorities may be directed to hear objections raised by the appellant to decide the questions as preliminary one. Proceedings under Section 90B appears to be pending before the revenue authorities and in case appellant would have any grievance or any interest over the property in question, he shall apply before the authorities for making him the party and, thereafter, he may also raise all the questions which are being raised in this appeal before the authorities itself. It goes without saying that in case such a prayer is made by the appellant, same should be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. With these directions, this appeal is dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. (NARAYAN ROY), CJ. anil