IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20849 of 2010 RAMPRIT MAHTO S/OL KULDEEP MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 09.08.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 188, 170 (F), 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, read with Section 27 Arms Act and 3,4 of Explosive Substance Act. Considering that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and subsequently his name transpired during investigation but there is no specific overt act alleged against him and he has no criminal antecedents, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Majipur, in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 143/2006, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the - 2 - given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )