1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Criminal Writ Petition No.240 of 2009. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ 1. Heard. 2. There is alternate remedy available by way of Revision. Learned advocate submits that inspite of availability of such alternate remedy, the petition may be considered. Ordinarily, when there is alternate remedy available, the Writ Petition may not be encouraged in view of "Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others" (2008) 2 Supreme Court Cases 409. It is only in exceptional cases that this Court will entertain such Writ Petition inspite of there being availability of alternate remedy and generally the party may be relegated to the alternate remedy. In this view of the matter, Petition dismissed. 3. The petitioner is at liberty to seek appropriate remedy like Revision. (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) Dt.14.09.2009. asp/office/Crwp240.09