IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 232 of 2007 (M/S) M/s Vigyan Chemicals Industries … Petitioner Versus The District Judge, Dehradun & others … Respondents Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. S.K. Jain, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sudhir Kumar, the learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondent No. 1 and Mr. Sidhartha Singh, the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. 2. In view of the provision of Section 20 of the C.P.C., the revisional court was justified in returning the plaint to be presented before the appropriate court at Saharanpur, since, the court finds that the suit was one of recovery of money and the defendant resided and carried on his business at Saharanpur. 3. In the light of the aforesaid, the Court does not find any error in the impugned order of the revisional court. 4. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 27.12.2011 Aswal