THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 19753 of 2010 Dated: 11.08.2010 Between: Thakur Ramesh Prasad and others … Petitioners And The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Lower Tank bund, Hyderabad represented by its Commissioner and another … Respondents The Court made the following:- THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 19753 of 2010 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents authorities in returning the building plan submitted by the petitioners in respect of house bearing No. 6-3-682 and 6-3-682/A, situated at Punjagutta, Hyderabad is arbitrary and illegal. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents-Corporation. The impugned letter dated 02.08.2010 shows that the building application submitted by the petitioners were not approved pointing out the following defects: “i. The site under reference is abutting to existing road of 22’ to 34’-3” as against required 30’/9mts road. ii. The proposals were submitted in the name of Thakur V Sanjay Prasad and others, but the document submitted in the name of Thakur V Hari Prasad for which a clarification is required.” The learned counsel for the petitioners states that objection No.1 would be clarified by the petitioners. So far as objection No.2 is concerned, while pointing out to an affidavit of the 3rd petitioner filed along with the building application explaining the circumstances under which the proposals were submitted in the name of Thakur Sanjay Prasad, the learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the 2nd objection was raised without application of mind to the material already produced by the petitioners. It is to be noticed that in the impugned letter the petitioners were only called upon to clarify the objections and no adverse decision as such was taken. In the circumstances, the learned standing counsel for the Corporation states that as soon as the clarifications are furnished by the petitioners, the same would be considered by the respondents- Corporation in accordance with law. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioners to resubmit the building application clarifying the objections raised in the impugned letter dated 02.08.2010. On receipt of the same, the respondents shall consider and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of resubmission of the application. No costs. ______________ Date: 11.08.2010 G. ROHINI, J Note: Issue CC of order in two days. (B/o) Ivd