IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 118 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Kamaleshwar Prasad S/o Indra Dutt Kulashi. 2. Smt. Sarswati Devi W/o Indra Dutt Kulashi, R/o 157, Ashok Nagar, Dandhera, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. ............ Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary Home, Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 2. Station House Officer, P.S. Gangnahar Roorkee, District Haridwar. 3. Smt. Deepa Devi D/o Jagdamba Prasad, R/o House No. 1821, Ganeshpur, Roorkee, District Haridwar. ......... Respondents Mr. Manoj Shah, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pandey, Asstt. Govt. Advocate for the State of Uttaranchal. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon. Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Manoj Shah, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pandey, Asstt. Government Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No. 3. 2. Mr. H.C. Pandey, the learned Asstt. Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of the first information report and the case registered against them, now has become infructuous, as the 2 police after the completion of the investigation has filed charge sheet in the Court against the petitioners. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 19.05.2006 19.05.2006 H