a, IN -IE BIE COURT OP KARNRWA AT lkfltOP! DkT t Pits TIE 30T1 Di? OP JUNE 1998 BEfl tiE CN’BLE WtJUSIICEt L.DkflU MIT PETITION ‘t’:2607°/19°3 Sri ICrls t na Ra’n 3alekundrl, aged about 48 years, Occ: P.!..Teac,er, Su&arabai q a’i&r’a -Ijsb School, Daddj, Tcn’ftkkerj, Dist: Belgaum. •.•PETITIO”ER. ( 9r JaakumarS.Pati] Adv., 1. Tie State of Karnitaka by its Secretary to Govt., De’,artmt of Ed’cat’on, ri - 1? 7 . . .2. 4 2 : C, 2. The Deputy Director of Public’ Inttructions, Selqara, Diet: Belgaum. 3. The Director f Public Instnictj ne lirupatunga Road, Bangalore. . . •PES”oNEEN 8. C Sri Sidayananar AGA. ) Writ Pe1!tjon filed tnder Articles 226 and 27 of the Constitutionof India wifl an affi’3avit trayint to direct res t’idents 2 and 3 to aeeord approval for irleentatin of revi sea pay scale of •.SC—1l2fl f,xxn Jar.l°77 and ‘irther revised from 7.6.90 scale of -.l400e2750 wit’i all conseiuantial benefits & etc. Writ petition is cx,ming on for hearinj tais day the cmirt nade the following: ORt ER Petitioner in this writ peti ti ,n .... . r : 3 is staff rking in aided private educational in’titutins, Petitioner is before this court interalia sceking directions to tv resoondents to accor certain service bepfits including monetary benefits In my view, these reliefs cannot be granted by this court in view of the obsr— vations made by a Djvision Bencn of this court in ‘J.,Nos.1833 o I336/19 disDosed off on 3O.S.198 This court while cocsidring tie issue whether the staff (Teachin an nor teacuing) rking in cducatinal institutios run by private rrnagement can maintain writ petitions to claim financial aid from toe State Govt in the absence of Master and , S * 5 4 5 :4: Servant relation and other incidental issues, tas pleased to observe that t’ie writ netitions filed by teathing and n n tee iing staff of private educati )nal institutions are not maintainable before t iis court. Respectfully following the observatinns made in the aforesaid decision, this petiti n is disposed off as not maintainable b fore tiis cart for the raliefa snu2ht thsreir. 4nver, liberty is reserved to t ie netiti ner ta anoroad tie procee forum as sugge°ted by this court in th* af-resa.td decision. Ordered accor tngly. J 9’ Sd/a JUDGE BiG ‘j c.by’$r ,, COPY r.by j3 AnWavt Pnktrn High Court of rt q