IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 1512 of 2009 Between: Ch. Srinivasulu S/o. Late Venkaiah R/o. D.No.4/1, Aditya Enclave, Kanchan Ganga Block, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Prl. Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Director General & Inspector General of Police Aandhra Pradesh Hyderabad. 3 Commissioner of Police Hyderabad City Hyderabad. 4 Inspector of Police Women Police Station Central Crime Station, Hyderabad. 5 B. Madhav R/o. 98/C, Ground Floor, Vengal Rao Nagar, Hyderabad. 6 S. Sudhakar S/o. Partha Sarathi C/o. B. Madhav, 98/C, Ground Floor, Vengal Rao Nagar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondent No.4 in interfering with the matrimonial dispute between petitioner and his wife and repeatedly calling the petitioner to Women Police Station, Central Crime Station, Hyderabad as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents desist themselves from interfering with civil and matrimonial dispute between petitioner and his wife. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner questioning the action of respondents 1 to 4 in interfering with the matrimonial disputes between himself and his wife at the instance of respondents 5 and 6. On the last occasion, when the writ petition was taken up, the learned Government Pleader for Home took time to get instructions. Today, when the matter is taken up, the learned Government Pleader has placed before this Court the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.4 inter alia stating that the Station House Officer, Women Police Station, CCS, Hyderabad registered a case against the petitioner on 4.1.2009 in Crime No.04/2009 under Sections 498-A, 406 and 506 IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, and that the police officials are not interfering with the personal liberty of the petitioner. Recording the above statement made by the learned Government Pleader, the writ petition is closed. N.V.RAMANA,J Dt.6.2.2009 msv