HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR fSSt^ WSi PETITIONER W.P.(CtNo. 2066 of 2011 Satanand Mishra, S/o Shri Ramnihal Mishra, aged about 65 years, R/o Village- Sherikhedi, Patwari Halka No. 112, Revenue Circle, Raipur, Tahsil- Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 1 Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, District: Raipur (C.G.) 2 The Collector (Land Acquisition, Raipur) Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 3 Land Acquisition Officer, & Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue) Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 4 Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division No.1, Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance: Mr. P.K. Patel, Advocate for the pefitioner. Mr. ArunSao, Govt. Advocate forthe State/respondents on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (20.04.2011) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heard. Petitioner- Satanand Mishrahas filed this petition for issuance of necessary directions to the concerned respondents to pay the amount of compensation awarded to him in Land Acquisition Case No. 24/A/82, year 2008-09, Village- Sherikhedi PC No. 112, Rl Circle, Raipur. Mr. P.K. Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that though the entire exercise relating to payment of compensation in compliance of the award dated 24.11.2010 has been completed long .^y<%^^ '^ '^ <sry &J;»*i>' '(!? "2 W.P.fONo. 2066 of2011 back, but no payment has been released in favour of the petitioner till date. He submits that the petitioner has made representation to the concerned Collector on 12.1.2011 (Annexure-P/4), but even after that no compensation has been paid to the petitioner. His submission is that presently this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the concerned Collector and the said authority may be directed to dispose of the representation within the stipulated period granted by this Court. This limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by learned counsel for the State. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that if so advised, the petitioner may file a fresh representation within a period of 15 days from today before the concerned Collector along with all relevant documents,and if such a representation is filed, the said authority shall dispose ofthe same within a furtherperiod of4 weeks from the date ofreceipt ofthe representation. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. There shall be no order as to cost. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge