IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24297 of 2008 UPENDRA KUMAR @ UPENDRA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---------- 2. 17.7.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rampur P.S. Case No.78/07 for the alleged offences registered under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is not a named accused. However, he is involved in the commission of the alleged offence on the confessional statements of co-accused, namely, Rohit Raj Yadav and Manoj Kumar Singh. It is further submitted that the petitioner is a student of B.I.T., Sindri and has been falsely implicated in this case to ruin his career. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, and on perusal of the allegations made in the F.I.R. and the averments made in the petition, it is directed that petitioner Upendra Kumar @ Upendra Yadav, in the event of his arrest or surrender in 2 connection with Rampur P.S. Case No.78/07 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)