THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH W.P.NO.27828 OF 2005 Dt.29.12.2005 Between: K.Madhava Reddy … Petitioner And The District Collector, Anantapur, and 3 others. … Respondents ORDER: The petitioner questions the order of the Joint Collector, Anantapur, dt.16.9.2005 in allowing the appeal filed by the 4th respondent against the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer dt.7.3.2005 wherein the authorization of the 4th respondent has been cancelled. Against which the 4th respondent filed an appeal and the appellate authority allowed the appeal and accordingly the authorization of the fair price shop of the 4th respondent has been restored and he is distributing the essential commodities. As against the said order, the petitioner filed revision along with an application to suspend the order of the 2nd respondent before the District Collector - revisional authority. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. Having filed a revision before the first respondent, it is not open for the petitioner to question the said order of the Joint Collector before this Court. As the petitioner is not entitled to pursue parallel proceedings, I do not see any justification on the part of the petitioner to file this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. However, the revisional authority may consider and dispose of the revision after giving reasonable opportunity to the petitioner as well as to the 4th respondent in accordance with law. _______________ (V.ESWARAIAH, J.) 29.12.2005 kpr