:1: :1: :1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 918 OF 2008 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s Orders Orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.B.Unnikrishnan for the petitioners. Sanjay Jain with Mr.Indu Prakash i/by. Mr.C.K.Tripathi for respondent nos.2 and 3. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 11TH FEBRUARY,2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. In the light of the clarification issued by the Trial court and more particularly the liberty granted under the impugned order to raise appropriate pleas with regard to the order passed by the Authority concerned on 26.10.2006 being vitiated for breach of principles of natural justice, so also, the Bombay Municipal :2: :2: :2: Corporation being a party defendant to the suit, the officer of BMC is not necessary to be impleaded. As such, there is no reason to interfere with the impugned order refusing the amendment to the plaint. The clarification given in para-11 of the impugned order sufficiently protects the rights of the petitioner-original plaintiff. Petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. (JUDGE)