IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37038 of 2009 1. RAMESH CHAUDHARY S/O SONELAL SAHANI, R/OVILL PARSARA, P.S. PEAR(HARTHA O.P.), DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2 14.12.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the Counsel appearing for the State. First Information Report has been instituted for offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code in which Pear P.S. case No. 98 of 2005 was registered. Counsel for the petitioner submits that due to some village dispute a Panchayati was convened in the village. The informant has instituted the First Information Report after three months of the alleged occurrence as he was not paid the money. In fact no such offence has taken place. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioner is allowed. In the event of his arrest/surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, petitioner aforesaid will be 2 enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10, 000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Pear P.S. case No. 98 of 2005, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar