IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17070 of 2009 SURESH YADAV, SON OF LATE DHARI YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GULAL CHAK, P.S. DULHIN BAZAR, DISTRICT PATNA. ----- PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 6.10.2009 The certified copy of the compromise petition should be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The First Information Report is against unknown. The petitioner’s name has been disclosed on the basis of statement given by some co-villagers. Later the informant has stated that this petitioner was not amongst the persons who had stolen sheep and assaulted him. A compromise petition has been filed in the Court below stating therein that this petitioner was not involved in the occurrence. As far as the injuries are concerned, learned counsel submits that they are all simple in nature. Considering the nature of the offence and the fact that the petitioner was not named in the First Information Report and his name has come in the statement of co-villagers, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender in 2 connection with Bikram P.S. Case No. 49 of 2007 within a period of six weeks on furnishing bail bond of rupees ten thousand with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Danapur (Patna) subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)