..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.508 OF 2008 Mrs.Karishma Vishal Khanna. ..Applicant. Versus SDV Air Link India Ltd. and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Kedar G. Prabhu, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.Y.M.Nakhwa, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 15th December, 2008. DATED : 15th December, 2008. DATED : 15th December, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant - orig.accused No.3 and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is facing prosecution in Case No.2370/SS/2005 which is pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 44th Court, Andheri, Mumbai. In the said case, by order dated 8th December, 2005 the learned Magistrate issued process under Section 138 read with 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Being aggrieved thereby, this application has been preferred for quashing of an order of the learned Magistrate issuing process against the applicant. 3. For the reasons recorded in the order passed by this Court in the case of V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, which has been upheld by the ..(2).. Hon’ble Apex Court I am of the opinion that the applicant has an efficacious remedy of preferring revision against the order of Magistrate issuing process. Hence, in my view, it would be appropriate that the applicant prefers a revision before the concerned Sessions Court against the order of the Magistrate issuing process. 4. Liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer the necessary revision before the concerned Sessions Court. The learned Advocate for the applicant makes a statement that the necessary revision will be preferred within five weeks from today. In view of this statement, the trial Court shall not proceed with the trial for a period of five weeks. 5. If the revision is preferred within five weeks, delay, if any, in preferring the revision be condoned. On the necessary revision being preferred by the applicant before the concerned Sessions Court, the concerned Sessions Court shall dispose of the matter on merits. 6. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. ..(3).. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]