mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.1724 of 1999 Mustafa Moiz Rakla .. Plaintiff versus Ms.Sangeeta Bali & Anr. .. Defendants ... Ms.K.M.Bhatia for the plaintiff None for the defendants. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 17th July 2009 P.C:- 1. The defendant no.1 has filed an appearance through his advocate on 7th May 1999. In last 10 years, plaintiff has not taken any steps for service of Summons for Judgement on the defendant no. 1 or her advocate. The suit against defendant no.1 is therefore dismissed under Rule 227 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules. 2. As regards the defendant no.2, learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that writ of summons was issued to the defendant no.2 also. However, it has not been served. The defendant has not taken steps for a period of nearly 10 years of service of writ of summons on the defendant no.2. Suit is therefore dismissed against defendant no.2 under Order 9 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The entire suit stands disposed of. (D.G. KARNIK, J)