MLW 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. 356? / 2011 PETITIONER z / Smt. Sarswati Singh W/o. Lalit Kumar Singh , Aged about 27 years R/o. Village Baigapara, Beltikri, Tahsil— Surajpur Distt. Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS x 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through — The Secretary, Woman and Child Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur C.G.) Collector, Surguja, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Smt. Gangotri Rajwade, W/o. Mukdev Rajwade, R/o. Village - Majhapara Beltjkri , Tahsil — Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (9 3I’ SB' Hcn’ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J 06.07.2011 Shri A.N. Pandey, counself and 3. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel La _ er for the State/respondents No. 1, 2 Heard. This petition has been fil r the petitioner. by the petitioner aggrieved by the appointment of respondent No.4 as Aanganbadi Worker. Learned counsei for the pe tioner submits that the appointment of respondent No.4 is iliegal becau the petitioner was more meritorious candidate and he was entitled for a pointment as Aanganbadi Worker. Learned counsel for the Stat submits that under the State Poiicy, in \ the matter of dispute reiating to a pointment of Aanganbadi Worker, there is a remedy of appeai before the appeal before the Commissioner. l do not find any extra ordinary reason to entertain this writ petition in l under Article 226 of the Constitution of to mst avail the alternative remedy. ollector and further remedy of second exercise of discretionary jurisdictior india without insisting the petitioner The petition is finally dispose d off. Sdl- ndra Mohan Shrivastava Judge Mani