3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. N0. (^"^- OF 200S _ _ _ ^QM ^y ,sv g15i< Raghvendra Singhania S/o Shri PETITIONER ....-^^Maluram Ln\o^"",'^.^'.-sin9hania' A9ed aourt 34 years, ^^••'flV^ ..-• R/° Village Tatyapara, Raipur/ ....-"^,0^ ...•••""' ^. Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) '^^: RESPONDENT VERSUS Raipur Development Authority through Chief Executive Officer Raipur Development Authority, RaipurG.E. Road Raipur, (C.G.) WRIT PETITIONE UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS OR APPROPRIATATE ORDER/DIRECTIO ETC. 047 HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHR1 S.R. NAYAK, C.J. WRIT PETITION N0.7 OF 2006 PETITIONER RESPONDENT Vs. Raghvendra Singhania, S/o Shri Maturam Singhania, Aged about 34 years, R/o Village Tatyapara, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.) Raipur DevelopmentAuthority, through Chief Executive OfRcer, Raipur DevelopmentAuthority, Raipur, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) Present: Mr. Bhaskar Payashi, learned counsel for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 4'" January, 2006) Tho point urged in this writ pstjtion squarely falls within the domain of appreciation of evidance. 1 do not find any failure of justice nor any jurisdictional flaw. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. ' Sd/- S.R. Nayak Chief Justice G.Singh