IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Civil Review No. 97 of 2011. Decided on: 9th December, 2011. CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Distt. Kangra, HP through its Registrar. …… Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Kartar Chand, S/o Shri Amar Singh, Ward No.1, Shastri Nagar, Palampur, distt. Kangra, HP. ….. Respondent. 2. Shri Prakash Chand , Senior Assistant, office of Comptroller, HPKV, Palampur, Distt. Kangra, HP. 3. Shri Man Chand, Senior Assistant, College of Home Science, HPKV, Palampur, Distt. Kangra, HP. 4. Shri Gian Chand, Senior Assistant, State Office, HPKV Palampur, Tehsil Palampur, Distt. Kangra, HP. 5. Shri Om Prakash, Senior Assistant, Office of Registrar, (Academic Branch), HPKV, Palampur, Distt. Kangra, HP. 6. Shri Atma Ram, Senior Assistant office of Comptroller, HPKV Palampur, Distt. Kangra, HP. 7. Shri Julfi Ram, Senior Assistant, office of Comprtoller HPKV, Palampur, Distt. Kangra, HP. 8. Shri Yudhbir Singh, Senior Assistant, office of Registrar (Estt-10, HPKV, Palampur, Distt. Kangra, HP. 9. Shri Vijay Kumar, Senior Assistant, Office of Comptroller, HPKV Palampur, Distt. Kangra, HP. …Performa-Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Lokendar Paul Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Rajesh Verma, vice counsel. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2 Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) CMP(M) No. 772 of 2011. Heard. The delay in filing the Review Petition is condoned. The application is disposed of. Civil Review No. 97 of 2011. This is a petition for review at the instance of respondent (Respondent No.1 in the writ petition). The matter pertains to the benefit to be granted to the writ petitioners in the light of the judgment in CWP No. 488 of 2001 titled V.K. Behal and others versus State of H.P. and others decided on 29.12.2008, who are Ex-servicemen. But we are informed that the matter is now pending before the Supreme Court. Therefore, it is made clear that the implementation of the judgment will be subject to the final outcome of the matter now pending before the Supreme Court arising from the judgment of this Court in V.K. Behal and others versus State of H.P. and others. 2. The review petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 9th December, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (kck) Judge.