IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8636 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 15, 2010. Nirmal Singh and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Pawan Kumar Goklaney, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners are working in the respondent-Board on various posts on work-charged basis and they seek a direction for regularization of their services in terms of the order dated 14.2.2008 (Annexure P-8) passed by this Court in the case of a similar situated employee. In this regard, the petitioners have already represented the authorities on 24.2.2009 (Annexure P-6) but no decision appears to have been taken thereupon so far. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioners' claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to consider the above noticed claim of the C.W.P.No .8636 of 2010 2 petitioners in the light of the decision of this Court dated 14.2.2008 (Annexure P-8) and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. July 15, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE