THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.133 OF 2011 22nd September, 2011. Between: M/S.UNITED TRANSPORT (PROPRIETARY FIRM) OFFICE AT SHOP NO.18, TRIVENI COMPLEX, HABSIGUDA, HYDERABAD REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR MR.R.VENKAT RAM REDDY .. APPELLANT AND A.P.DAIRY ;DEVELOPMENT CO- OPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD., (GOVERNMENT SOCIETY) OFFICE AT LALAPET, HYDERABAD REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR.HARPRETH SINGH AND ANOTHER .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.133 OF 2011 O R D E R: (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) Writ petitioner/appellant being aggrieved of the appointment of 1st respondent-Managing Director as an arbitrator therefore, writ petition, but of no avail to him because of the view taken by the learned single Judge that appointment of an Arbitrator could not be challenged under Article 226 of the Constitution. While taking the view the learned single Judge indicated the scheme traceable to The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 including Sections 12, 13, 16 and 34 that could be invoked by an aggrieved person. We are in agreement with the view so taken. That apart the 1st respondent-Managing Director is named as an Arbitrator in the agreement itself which is significantly relied upon by the writ appellant. In the given facts, interference is uncalled for. Dismissed. (VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR,J) (NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ) 22nd September, 2011. Nagesh babu THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.133 OF 2011 O R D E R: (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) 22nd September, 2011.