IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18281 of 2010 1. CHHOTAN KUMAR 2. BABLU KUMAR @ BABLOO KUMAR ---------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 30.7.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application, as during the pendency of this application, petitioner no.2 namely Bablu Kumar @ Babloo Kumar has been killed. Accordingly, this application is permitted to be withdrawn as having become infructuous as against petitioner no.2. For petitioner no.1, heard learned counsel for the parties. It is an admitted fact that enmity was prevailing in between the parties. Cases against the informant party, on behalf of accused persons are pending earlier and in later case one of the petitioners namely Bablu Kumar is killed and the informant is made accused in the said case but there is specific allegation against petitioner no.1 about his repeated Farsa blow on the informant’s head, one of such injury is grievous also which disentitles him for anticipatory bail. 2 Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner no.1 is rejected. However, petitioner no.1 is directed to surrender and pray for regular bail which shall be decided on its own merit. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)