IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14801 of 2010 1. MD.SABIR SON OF LATE MD. YAKKIN 2. RUKHSANA KHATOON WIFE OF LATE MD. YAKKIN, BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PIRBIGHA, P.S. CHANDAUTI, DISTRICT- GAYA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. NOOR AFSA KHATOON WIFE OF MD. SABIR, DAUGHTER OF MD. HAFIZ, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SADIPUR, P.S. CHANDAUTI, DISTRICT- GAYA ----------- 6 10.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the opposite party no.2. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the opposite party no.2. The offence alleged is under Sections 498A, 323, 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that on perusal of the complaint it would appear that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner no.1 and the allegations, whatsoever, are omnibus in nature that she was driven out from the house after taking her belongings by the co-accused persons except one Rukhsana Khatoon, petitioner no.2. Learned counsel for the opposite party submits that on account of the conduct of the petitioner as detailed in paragraph 4 of the counter affidavit he does not deserves to be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 1072 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)