IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1953 of 2010 Surendra Prasad Singh, S/o-Late Ram Kapit Singh, R/o-Vill.-Chakiya Kurkuri, P.O.-Kurkuri, P.S.-Paliganj, District-Patna. –Petitioner. VERSUS 1. D.M.-Cum-Collector Patna, Jitendra Kumar Sinha. 2. S.D.O., Paliganj, Patna, Santosh Kumar. 3. Umesh Kumar, S/o-Gandhi Rabidash, R/o-Vill-Kurkuri, P.S.-Paliganj, District- Patna. P.D.S. License No.30/97. 4. Smt. Chandu Devi, W/o-Ashok Kumar Paswan, R/o-Vill-Kurkuri, P.S.- Paliganj, District-Patna. P.D.S. License No.30/97. 5. State of Bihar. –Opposite Parties. WITH MJC No.1954 of 2010 Adyanand Singh, S/o-Parikhan Yadav, R/o-Vill.-Chakiya Kurkuri, P.O.-Kurkuri, P.S.-Paliganj, District-Patna. –Petitioner. VERSUS 1. D.M.-Cum-Collector Patna, Jitendra Kumar Sinha. 2. S.D.O., Paliganj, Patna, Santosh Kumar. 3. Umesh Kumar, S/o-Gandhi Rabidash, R/o-Vill-Kurkuri, P.S.-Paliganj, District- Patna. P.D.S. License No.30/97. 4. Smt. Chandu Devi, W/o-Ashok Kumar Paswan, R/o-Vill-Kurkuri, P.S.- Paliganj, District-Patna. P.D.S. License No.30/97. 5. State of Bihar. –Opposite Parties. ----------- 05 12.10.2011 By these two contempt applications the grievances of the petitioners was that pursuant to the order passed in the writ petition the authorities had not disposed of the representation within one month as directed. In view of the show cause as filed, it appears that the representation has been disposed of though after filing of the contempt application. As the matter has now been dealt with, it would be open to the petitioners, if they are aggrieved by the orders passed by respondent no.2, to prefer such application as may be advised to them. With this liberty, both the applications are disposed of. Trivedi/ (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)