wp10301-10.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10301 OF 2010 Kamlakar B. Patil (since deceased) by heir Gajanan K. Patil .. Petitioner versus Tulsabai @ Kashibai K. Patil (since deceased) by heirs Naresha K. Patil & Ors .. Respondents Mr.Machindra A. Patil for the petitioner. Mr.Suresh K. Mali for the respondents. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 30th JUNE 2011. P.C.: . Heard Mr.Patil appearing for the petitioner. Perused the concurrent orders wherein it has been specifically recorded that the respondent-Tulsabai has proved her status as that of a tenant. The findings recorded by the Tenancy Aval Karkoon and Sub-Divisional Officer so also Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal are consistent with the material placed on record. The petitioner’s case that Tulsabai is in possession as a servant and her wp10301-10.doc 2 Nokarnama has been all throughout disbelieved. This coupled with the other events, have been noted to indicate and conclusively hold that Tulsabai has proved her case of tenancy. For all these reasons and finding that there is no error apparent or perversity committed, this petition deserves to be dismissed. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)