IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6959 of 2011-H with CWP No. 8865 of 2011-G Decided on: 29.11.2011 1. Lekh Ram …Petitioner Versus HPSSSB and another …Respondents _______________________________________________________________________ 2. Devender Kumar ...Petitioner Versus H.P. Subordinate Selection Board & Anr. ...Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate in CWP No. 6959 of 2011-H Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate in 8865 of 2011-G For the respondents : Mr. Inder Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondent No. 2. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : In sequel to order dated 24.10.2011, the supplementary 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- affidavit stands filed. It is evident from the contents of the supplementary affidavit that 9 posts of Clerks are lying vacant in H.P. Secretariat Administrative Department. Mr. Inder Sharma, Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1 submits that he has no objection in case the petitioner(s) are appointed as Clerks in H.P. Secretariat Administrative Department. 2. In order to give quietus to these matters, the writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1 to recommend the name of the petitioner(s) for appointment to the vacant posts of Clerks lying vacant in Secretariat Administrative Department, within a period of three weeks from today. Thereafter, their joining shall be duly accepted. It is made clear that the seniority of the petitioner(s) shall be maintained strictly as per law. No costs. Copy dasti on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 29, 2011 (kalpana)