IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 22ND MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 4454 of 2010(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ K.BALACHANDRAN, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNANKUTTY, MUDUMBIL HOUSE, PACHALLOOR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR, KERALA TODDY WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD, ULLOOR, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE THIRVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT MADHYA- VITHESAMADHYA VYAVASAYA THOZHILALI UNION (AITUC), KODER LANE, STATUTE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1, REP.BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, SRI.KTTYANIKKADU MADHU. 6. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICE, A.K.TOWER, BAKERY JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. SRI.SURESH, S/O.SUGUNAN, KULAKKODU HOUSE, MALAYANKEEZHU P.O., NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA SRI.RENIL ANTO, SC FOR KTWWFB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 4454 OF 2010 (F) ===================== Dated this the 11th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's complaint is regarding the inaction on the part of the 1st respondent on Ext.P5. Petitioner submits that the 7th respondent is a registered worker in T.S.No.4 in Kattakkada Excise Range of which the petitioner is a licencee. It is also his case that at the same time, the 7th respondent is the licencee of toddy shops in Group No. II in Vamanapuram Excise Range 2. Yet another allegation is that the 7th respondent at the same time is an employee of ISRO in Thiruvananthapuram, seeking action against the 7th respondent, petitioner has filed Ext.P5 before the respondents and as stated above, his grievance is regarding the alleged inaction on the aforesaid representation. Having regard to the above, this writ petition is disposed of directing that the 1st respondent shall examine the grievance raised in Ext.P5 with notice to the petitioner and the 7th respondent and take action on Ext.P5. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp