© 777 ZN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILA3PUR ^^e^ Ij$iioh (^L^^ CC- CONTEMPT PETITIONNO. sl.^5..0F 2011 PETITIONER ...^. \\v ...,<^, ^^ '•^" Babulal Sahu, S/o Shri Bhagwano Sahu, Aged about 34 years, R/o Village Palsapali Post Agarpur, Thana and Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS ^ RESPONDENTS 1 Shri O.P. Chaudhri, Collector Dantebada, District Dantebada, Chhattisgarh. Shri P Dayanand, Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Dantebada, District Dantebada, (C.G.) CGNTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTBMFT OF COURT ACT READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF TKE CONSTITION OF INDiA. (Arising out of order dated 04.05.2011 passed in W.P.(S) N0. 2048/2011 by Hon'ble Single Judge.) ^. F?JrXI-HC-22 IN--"^^c^ t^ ^n^r^? -f^W^^T '^TWHit^? -^^ ^j|<4|^|<q^ ^Tli<-|^<o. [®I^I<H^< _.....C..^.?£)^.s3^" 200 ^IW^r^RT^ '•fN^^y' 'srr^i'?^!T^n: ^rft^ SB: HON'BLE SHRI MANINDRA ^OHAN SHRIVASTAVA.J. 25.7.2011 Shri Wasim Miyan, counsel f< Learned counsel for the petijtioi dated 4th A^ay. 2011, the Writ Pet respondent No.l/Collector, t>antew<| ensure that proper order is passed other order contrary to the order been passed. Learned counsel subnfjii was brought to the notice of the C]p representation dated 16.5.2011, bu| has passed any order nor posting issued by the Chief Executive Offi|cer reminder was also given on 4-6.2C|1 which amounts to willful disobedieil Court. On 4th May, 2011, order ha|s has been directed to look into thel order is passed for posting of the Though no specific period h| compliance of the order of the Coi|ir should have passed an appropriate cn(1Mf<n4l<1 'RT^ff "^ feT^ Tf^R^R '^^rf^FT ^n^r >|r1 the petitioner. ih'ioner submits that vide order |tion was disposed of directing kda to look into the matter and [for posting the petitioner, if no tlated 11.2.2011. in between, has its that the order of the Court >llector/respondents along with till date neither the Collector •der of the petitioner has been \ He further submits that a 11, but nothing has been done, ice of the order passed by this been pas^d and the Collector matter and ensure that proper ^etitioner. xs been fixed by this Court for irt, never the lessl+ie authority 'der within a reasonable time. J-T^-^^ .4. ^. ,®.'XJ-HC-22 •3~^ •^|<41^1ZT, ^•dly^ti. ^Kiy 3'nip?r 'PRT^ ^W^fT^W^R******'**"****'**'**" *''*'* "W^ 200 '"f^R^T' |e^/ W^1^T fsFri^T^n^T ^RW^itc? ^n^r ^cn^ "pl^ <- /2- y' Considering that the order wa^ ^ 2011,1 am not inclined to Jssue n| in case,appropriate order in complian| are not pqssed within a period of receipt of this order, the petitioner the petition. passed by this Court on 4th i|otice in the matt-er. However, fce of the order of this Court olne month from the date of jshall be at liberty to revive Sd/- ManindraMohanShrivastava ^l^i<rl^1r1 'HFMf ^ fe^ <Fal<^K ^ 3Tp<m v3TT^T 1-^^ ^r^