IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 64 of 2006 (M/B) Pooran Singh Bisht, S/o Sri Kesher Singh Bisht, Licensee of Country Wine Shop, Bagwalipokher, Almora. …….. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, 2. Superintendent of Police, Almora. 3. Station House Officer, Police Station Almora. 4. Sri Arvind Kumar Lohani, District Excise Officer, Almora. ……… Respondents Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No. 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No. 4. 2. Mr. H.C. Pande, the learned Addl. Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioner Pooran Singh Bisht seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him has, now, become infructuous, as the Police, after the completion of the investigation, has filed charge sheet against the petitioner’s co-accused persons, but no such charge sheet has been filed against petitioner Pooran Singh Bisht. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 15.06.2006 15.06.2006 G