IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41776 of 2008 ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri Sajneev Shankar For the State: Shri Mukesh Kr. Singh,APP ----------- 2. 14.11.2008 Heard. The petitioner is the husband and is alleged to have gone to Surat abandoning the wife in the family way. This is the main grievance. The contention is that, as may appear from the record of the lower court, the parties had compromised and on that basis the petitioner was admitted to provisional bail but the bond of the petitioner was cancelled again by the learned Magistrate holding that the petitioner had breached the condition of the compromise. If the petitioner had been granted provisional bail, there could no harm in directing the release of the petitioner. Accordingly, let the petitioner Ashok Kumar Sharma be released on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 5,000/-(five 2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri R.K. Prasad, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Hilsa, Nalanda, in Complaint Case No. 150(C ) of 2007. Learned counsel for the informant who appeared before me was very ardently arguing that the lady is desirous of living with the petitioner. The court below shall fix a date in the matter after informing the counsel for both the sides and shall encourage and make efforts also in that direction so that the spouses live together cordially. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)