S.B. : HON'BLE MR. 8ATISH K. AGMHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION (O No. 1128 of2007 Mukul Tiwari S/o Late B.L.Tiwari Age 60 years R/'o Near Girls School, Azad Chowk, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) v Corporation Throuj Commissioner, Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through- Collector, Raipur (C.G.) Smt. Kiran Mayee Nayak, Advocate with Shri C.R.Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, Advocate with Shri KashifShakeel, Advocate for respoadentNo. 1. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General with Shri Utkarsh Verma, Deputy Govemment Advocate, for respondent No. 2. itli (Passed on 29m ofMarch, 20071 1, In this petition, the facts and questions oflaw involved are the same as that ofin W.P. (C.) No. 257 of2007 (Deepak Kumar Shrivastava Vs. Municipal Coqporation, Raipur & another) which has been disposed of today i.e. 29 ofMarch, 2007. This petition stands disposed ofin the same terms and conditioDs. 2. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ainit