IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 1044 of 2011 Decided on: March 8, 2011. Rajeev Kumar. ……….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & ors. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG for respondents No. 1 to 3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is a PTA teacher. He is aggrieved since he has been replaced by the fourth respondent, who is a regular teacher. In case the petitioner points out any vacant post where the fourth respondent is willing to work, the second respondent will pass immediate order in that regard and permit the petitioner to continue till he is otherwise replaced by a regular recruitee. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. March 8, 2011. ( Justice Sanjay Karol), (vs) Judge.