In the High Court of Uttaranchal, at Nainital. Civil Misc. Review Application No. 28/2005 Dr. Gopal Singh Rawat, Joint Director Agriculture Garhwal Region, Pauri, District- Pauri Garhwal. ....Review Petitioner In Civil Writ Petition No. 296 of 2004 (S/B) Dr. Gopal Singh Rawat, Joint Director Agriculture Garhwal Region, Pauri, District- Pauri Garhwal. .... Petitioner Vs 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary, Agriculture Government of Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 2. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary Karmik Government of Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 3. State of U.P. through Secretary Agriculture, Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow. 4. State of U.P. through Secretary Karmik, Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow. 5. State Advisory Committee through its Member Secretary Union of India, Nehru Stadium Gate No. 31 Lodhi Road, New Delhi. 6. Union of India through Secretary Home New Delhi. 7. Sri Madan Lal, at present posted as Joint Director Agriculture, Directorate Uttaranchal, Nanda Ki Choki Prem Nagar, Dehradun. 8. Sri C.S. Mehra, at present posted as Joint Director, Agriculture, Directorate Uttaranchal, Nanda Ki Choki, Prem Nagar, Dehradun. ..... Respondents Sri S.N. Babulkar, learned Senior Advocate for the review petitioner. Sri Manoj Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent No.7. Coram: Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Date: 8-11-2005 P.C. Heard Sri S.N. Babulkar, learned Senior Advocate for the review petitioner and Sri Manoj Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent No.7. Learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the review petitioner drew attention to order dated 20-4-2005 passed by the Central Government (Annexure -1 to the review petition) and submitted that in view of the said order allocation in regard to the parties to the writ petition has been made and that fresh cause of action has arisen to the review petitioner to make a particular prayer before the court and seek remedy for his grievance. In view of this, the review petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is disposed of with the liberty to the review petitioner to take the legal remedy, as is provided, under law for redressal of his grievance. (B.S. Verma, J.) (Irshad Hussain, J.) ISB