1 Criminal Application No.1542/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1542 OF 2011 Kranti s/o Ishwar Yadke & others ... APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & anr. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri S.R. Dheple, Advocate for applicants Shri K.S. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent No.1. Shri U.S. Patil, Advocate for respondent No.2. ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 13th April, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr. Dheple and Mr. Patil for respective parties. Affidavit of (original complainant – respondent No.2) is tendered by Mr. Patil. Khajakhan @ Gulamkhajakhan s/o Dastgir Khan present in Court, identified by the counsel. 2. A F.I.R. was lodged vide Crime No.I-113/2009, dated 12.5.2009, with Osmanpura Police Station, making allegations for infraction of Sections 363, 366 and also Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, Section 376 of the Indian 2 Criminal Application No.1542/2011 Penal Code was also added by the Police. 3. The complainant inform that his daughter, the victim, who was allegedly kidnapped, was 17 years 10 months old at the material time and consequently, attracts infraction of Section 363 of the Criminal Procedure Code. 4. The accused applicant No.1 Kranti s/o Ishwar Yadke subsequently married the victim on 6.9.2009 and the couple is blessed with a child born on 27.5.2010. The parties do not wish to further prosecute the matter and have urged to permit to compound. 5. Considering above facts of the case, there would be no fruitful gain in keeping the prosecution and a hanging sword against the accused/ applicants. Since the couple is residing happily, patched their relations, by exercise of powers under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the proceedings relating to F.I.R. No.I-113/2009 referred above stands quashed and set aside. The accused/ applicants are discharged. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cri1542.11