(L^--)^f^ BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) W.P. fS) No.°>6<5^ of 2010 PETITIONER <r~ Gurubachan Singh Makkad, aged ^e'?.^-M'(ltl(A»(<. about 47 years^ Upper Division Teacher, S.S. Kali Badi, H.S. School, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) State of Chhattisgarh A^ ^- ~J '.** '>'••' \.9 ^.^4%^ ^?%v ^yy w. Through-The Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2) Director PubUc Instructions, State of Chhattisgarh, H.Q. Raipur (C.G.) -.<••. ^y--" ^/"^ y 1 a | S.». i ^l ^^...... 3) ' The Goveming Body of Kalibadi Shiksha Samiti, Through its Secretary, S.S. Kali Baid, H.S. School Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFL THE CONSTITUTION _QF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR ^Y MANDAMUS/DIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. /^ jl 01. Particulars about the petitioner : sn^i ^Tri;-ii'+ WT 3D^I WTO' '3~5T •<II*IK'I<(, a^l'^ifi, fsi<niy^< —^.A.t£2.^;l^).°., Sf^f TpRT (licl?A°l<q) TOnw^fsBsn^i SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra MohaEL 19-07-2010 Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer With the oonsent of learned cifeunsel Jieard finally at the stage ofadmission| br the petitioner. State on advance copy. for the parties, the matter is fctrthe By this petition, the petitioner h( advertisement dated 10-07-2010 (Ann{ Submission of learned counfe petitioner was initially appointed as Uf}per he was promoted to the post of Leotuf was not approved and wrongly rejwjted, Court by filing a petition wherein an| (Annexure P-2), to consder the case post of Lecturer within a period of t( counsel for the petitioner is that aft< application was submitted for consid| vide Annexure P-3 and without passirjg impugned advertisement has been sought to be made on the post of Shihlsha the post of Lecturer. In view of above, jt appears petitioner on the apprehension that post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-1, for the post against which the petitioner i ^N?pN *<w?ii ^ fe^t ^i*<i< [fai hrivastaya,J. is prayed for quashing of impugned •xure P-4). ^el for the petitioner is that the Division Teacher and thereafter |er on 09-06-1993. As his promotion i, the petitioner approaohed this order was passed on 17-06-2010 |of the petitioner for approval on the Wo months. Submisskan of learned ;r the order dated 17-06-2010, an l^ration of his case on 09-07-2010 any order on the said application, i^suecf, by whteh, appointment has <|sha Karmi Grade-1, which is against ^^ ^hat this petitionjlwas^filed by the <|hough advertisement mentions the w^ich, applications have been invited, working, has atso been advertised ?lTO.-^-,i.]T<i.sk''IRB:,rpi.T;<r.ltii'—FS/147—2/2010—1,00,000. -.^Lt'<~\ ""E \ ^-.^~' s 311^1 Vf R-li'b 'tP'ff^^?! sh^i<t> ^J Tumane •y- *nw(rw*ira> 3^ '<<I<IICIA|, ®Ti!<-i'i6,[qcii'yy ..^..•.?..£-?.^.;.li??'/.l.?. sn^n 'vs^ (. lic<!^ai<^) ireiRIT ^lftd 311^1 -—l^- for selection by way of advertisemer)! dated 10-07-2010 (Annexure P-4) s|l Karmi Grade-1 have been advertised. are invited for appointment to the posf filed on mere apprehension. Hovreve^ anyone against the post, on which, would be at liberty to challenge the sa|ne With the aforesaid observation, <frT'ill?T4t7I *ll*«nftf fs^l •(Pf'l^K ^TSififfI 311^1 t. A bare reading of advertisement hows that three posts of Shiksha t nowhere says that the applications of Lecturer. This petition has been ', in case, respondents witl appoint petitbner is working, the petitioner in accordance with law. the petition is finally disposed of. SdA Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge iIi-eOii CTifll iiCTItS!, <r.i!TiFro-'-FS'H7—;.'ZOIO-l,00,000. T;J ^smm-m