IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2008 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 37765 of 2008(U) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SIDHARTHAN, S/O.MADHAVAN, MADHAVAM, ASHRAMAM P.O., KOLLAM-2. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.PRASAD SRI.ABHILASH S.FRANCIS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE REVENUE SECRETARY, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 3. THE SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. N. SUDHA DEVI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C)No. 37765 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 19th day of December, 2008. J U D G M E N T In respect of an alleged mistake in resurvey the petitioner has filed Ext.P1 representation before the District Collector and the Survey Superintendent. He seeks direction to dispose of the same. The learned Government pleader would submit that the grievance of the petitioner cannot be redressed by the District Collector or the Survey Superintendent to whom Ext. P1 has been addressed. In spite of the said contention, the petitioner seeks a direction to the Survey Superintendent, Kollam, the 3rd respondent herein to dispose of Ext.P1. After hearing both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1, as expeditiously as possible. However, I make it clear that I have no pronounced on the maintainability of Ext.P1 before the 2nd respondent, which also has to be considered by the 3rd respondent in accordance with law while disposing of Ext.P1. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs