IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2677 OF 2008 Tanaji S. Ghadage .... Petitioner V/s. Murlidhar H. Prakshale .... Respondent. Mr.P.G.Chavan, for the Petitioner. Mr.R.G.Ketkar i/b Umesh R. Mankapure for the Respondents. CORAM : A.A. SAYED, J. DATE : 30TH APRIL 2008 P.C. 1. The only exception which the petitioner has to the impugned order is in relation to the direction given by the trial Court that the Commissioner is to take the sugarcane crop in person from the suit property to the factory in the name of the “defendant”. The counsel for the petitioner submits that instead of defendant, who is respondent herein, let the sugarcane crop be in the name of the petitioner. 2. In my view, interest of justice would be served if the impugned order is modified to the extent that instead of the name of the defendant or plaintiff, the sugarcane crop will be taken in the name of the Commissioner. I order accordingly. Rest of the impugned order stands as it is. 3. Exh.5 application be disposed of by the trial Court expeditiously. The trial court should not be influenced by the observations of this Court in deciding Exh.5 application. 4. With the above modification, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 5. The trial court to act on authenticated copy of this order. ( A.A.Sayed, J.)