IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NOS.10531, 12317, 12998, 12316, 12321, 12997, 13000, 13002, 13004 AND 18550 OF 2009 DATE OF DECISION: MAY 03 ,2011 M/s Moldwel Enterprises, District Jhajjar .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Arun Jain, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana, for the State. Mr. Dhiraj Chawla, Advocate. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Counsel for respondent-Haryana State Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (for short, “HSIIDCL”) makes a statement that the impugned notices are being withdrawn subject to their right to revive such notices in case the services provided by HSIIDCL are put to use by the petitioner(s). For this, HSIIDCL will issue an appropriate notice to those petitioners, who use the facilities and if any amount is to be recovered from them. In view of the above statement made by the counsel, these writ petitions are rendered infructuous and are disposed of with this common order. May 03 ,2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE