hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9206 OF 2009 Kashinath Gaikwad and anr. ... Petitioner Versus Pune Municipal Corporation and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. S.M. Phatak for Petitioner. None for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 25, 2009 P.C. It is the case of the Petitioner that they are owners/occupants of the land identified being Survey No. 126/2C. It is submitted that the adjoining land is bearing Survey No. 126/2B. The owner/occupants of land bearing S. No. 126/2B filed an application for development and that was granted. The Petitioners being aggrieved filed a complaint contending that the occupant of S. No. 126/2B had fabricated the documents to include part of their land bearing S. No. 126/2C. On Petitioners’ complaint an enquiry was held and respondent No. 1 came to the conclusion that the development permission was obtained based on fabricated documents. Inspite of that, till date no action has been taken. The learned counsel points out to us that Respondent No. 1 was served on 7.11.2009. None appears for the respondents. Considering the controversy, this petition can be disposed of by issuing the following directions : Respondent No. 2 by himself or through a competent officer to decide the application filed by the Petitioner for action against development by the owner/occupant of Survey No. 126/2B and after hearing both the parties, to take steps at any rate not latter than eight weeks from today. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (F,I. REBELLO,J.)