-:- 1 -:- Writ Petition No.7605 of 2011 (PIL). 01.10.2011 :- Shri A.S.Garg, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Aditya Garg, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri C.S.Ujjaniya, learned Panel Lawyer for the Respondent No.4/State, on advance copy. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners on the question of admission. O R D E R BY this petition, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, the petitioners have challenged the advertisement published on 19.08.2010 (Annexure-P/1) issued by the first and the second Respondents inviting applications for allotment of retail outlet at various places including at “Mahidpur City 4 kms. from Bus Stand towards Ghosla and 2 kms. towards inside Mahidpur Road”. [2] The grievance of the petitioners are that the said advertisement is contrary to the IRC 2009 providing for the minimum required size for allotment of a petrol pump to be 35 x 35 meter; whereas as per the impugned advertisement -:- 2 -:- required plot size is shown as 30 x 30 meter. The petitioner has also alleged that in the advertisement the Respondents No.1 and 2 have not adhered to the criteria of reservation. [3] As regard the ground about non-adherence to the criteria of reservation, no material has been produced before us to show as to in the entire State while making allotments, there is violation of criteria and policy of reservation has been done, therefore, in the absence of any material, the ground raised cannot be entertained in the petition. So far as the other grievance, we find that the petitioners have already submitted their objections before the Grievance Redressal Committee as is clear from Annexure-P/4, in the circumstances we feel that no interference in the matter is called for when the matter is pending consideration before the Grievance Redressal Committee. [4] In the circumstances, keeping in view the fact that the petitioners have already approached to the Grievance Redressal Committee, we decline to entertain this petition. However, we direct the Grievance Redressal Committee to consider the petitioners' grievance and take appropriate -:- 3 -:- decision on it as expeditiously as possible, preferably within three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Cc within three days. [ Shantanu Kemkar ] [ Prakash Shrivastava ] JUDGE JUDGE (AKS)