BIPUR LAs. .. ,. PETITIONER /Padumnn hruw,‘ S/o. Pusau Ram Dhruw, Agfd about 50-.‘yenns; Warking. {gga as (Cé) Up~Jnllor § in Central JaiL burg I W aa‘w" gSPoNDENts ,/ 1, stata of Chhattlsgar R h VERSUS Through the Secretary Deparfmenf of ‘ Home Qatar D-l(,$., Bhawanz, Mantralnya, Ruipur (5.6.) Th3 Jail superintendzn‘t, Cenfml Jail, Durg (C.GJ \lqlmiki Dhnuw,. Pasfted at Up-jail, Snnjari» Balod, District Ddrg:(£.&.) - an- PEnTIoN uNnER Akmg 2gb pr THE mmw @E mm 9 w mm .....M€L§2n$§ma 311%“ m (WET) WWW SB: Hon.‘lVir. Justiee Prlfinker Eiwaker 13.67.2%§: 8hri Arvind Dubey counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj GA for thr Challenge in this petition i K1200 y WWWW ammm mm wmm %§a’1m‘m V pa’ssed by respondent No.1 by w} 0n the pest of Up Jaiior, Central l lhe same capacity lo Central Je ground. Contention of the, counse petll‘ioner is a vlcfim of frequent Ere been transferred four times from or At this stage, counsel for the perition with liberty ro make a concerned. He also prays for a >c representation so made. Accordingly, the petition is Ci l if the petitioner makes a represent ismissed as withdrawn. However, e respondents/State. S to lhe order dated 30.6.2009 flch the petitioner who is working lail, Durg has been transferred in iii, Amhikapur, on administrative for the petitioner is that the insfer and from 24.3.20U8 he has e place to other. ; petitioner wants to withdraw this 'epresentation to the authorities irection for early disposal of the atlon to the authorities concerned within a period of 16 days from t e date of receipt of copy of this order, the authorities concerned shall decide the same within a further period of three weeks from he date of‘its receipt. Till then the order impugned shall be kept in ab yanoe. :i v' Pritinker Diwaker ” " Judge i ‘ Sd/- W $1121 WWW—Fs/w—l 1 [2008 1,00,000. W‘t‘