IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN MONDAY, THE 5TH JULY 2010 / 14TH ASHADHA 1932 RP.No. 574 of 2010() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.2019/2006 Dated 26/03/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- V.VISWANATHAN PILLAI, KURUKKOOT HOUSE, (RETD U.D.CLERK, G.R.E.F) CHINGOLI P.O.,ALAPPUZHA DIST, PIN-690532,KERALA, BY ADV. V.VISWANATHAN PILLAI(PARTY IN PERSON) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY (BRDB) SENA BHAVAN, NEW DELHI. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL, BOARDER ROADS, KASHMIR HOUSE, DHQPO,NEW DELHI-11. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PROJECT DANTAK, C/O. 99 A.P.O 4. THE COMMANDER, H.Q.19,BRTF, C/O.99 A.P.O. 5. THE OFFICER, COMMANDING, 504 SS AND TC (GREF), C/O.99 A.P.O. BY G.P.SMT.T.B.RAMANI, ADV.SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/07/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.Ramachandran Nair & P.S.Gopinathan, JJ. ------------------------------------------- R.P.No.574 of 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of July, 2010 ORDER Ramachandran Nair, J. Heard the review petitioner in person. We do not find any merit in the review petition, because the petitioner has not been able to establish that he was working in an area where Bhutan Compensatory Allowance is applicable. During the 4 years service he was not entitled to get any Bhutan Compensatory Allowance. So much claim for the allowance in pension is not acceptable. Revision petition is accordingly dismissed. C.N.Ramachandran Nair, Judge P.S.Gopinathan, Judge cms