‘17 [% CM/ mTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w.P.No. #26 6 'L /2002 ; at PETITIONER Azad Khan, s/o. Late Shri Ramjan Khan, aged about 43 years, Occupation—Service, Sub Engineen (presently posted at Janpad Panchayat ankargarh, in R. E. S. Department), Shankargarh Distt. Surguja (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS State of Chhatisgarh, through : Chief Secretary, D.K.S. Bhawan, mantralay, Raipur (C.G.). Deputy Secretary, Panchayat Avam Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Vikash Ayukt, Panchayat Avam Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). The District Collector, Surguja (Chhattisgarhy Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Shankargarh, Distt. Surguja (Chhattisgarh). ,f INDIA FOR APPROPRIATE DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS, ORDER/ORDERS IN THE NATURE OF WRIT, MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI PROHIBITION ETC. 0’1) PARTICULARS OF THE PETIONERz— As given in the cause title. w§ ’ XLHC—22 WW I WWW mm w PN u.‘:.?¢.h.éa¢u WW 2091, Cg mm WW%@W WWW mmm 31‘axfanm 03.03.2003 Shri Sushil Dubey, counse for the petitioner l Shli Rambir Siligh, GVA. the State: for Heard, Though this matr is ’ls for hean'ng 011 admiesion, on te it d the prayer of leame& couneel r the petitioner and th the o wi conserxt of the State Counse t matter is bemg isomd of e admso stage. th isin The challeng in this writ tition is to the orr of transfer e pe de dated 14.1.2002 whereb the ttioner wo is SubEngineer under the Janpad Panchayt, Shanargal‘, District Surguja, a a kh has been transferred to Dantewat, ce Though the ore of tranfer has been chalnged in the dr s le ptition on various grounds, at te time f hearing on 10022003 e h o it was fairly stated by the learn counse for the petitioner that ed l e petitioner will oin at the ace of transfer ut he may be th j pl b protected till the end of the academic session so that education of his two minor children who were studying in Amhikapur is not .__.$ [new l. he do at 1 y 1:ei h a - Xl—HC-22 WNW WW WWW Em WWW1§f§€rW emfanm ax gaffected. Learned counsel for Gbtain instructiong in that regaIL 111 View of the h'lnited na1 petition, the Court feels that no m kecping the writ petition pend of at this stage; Accordinglv, thv direction that the ord€r of transt given effect to till the end of academic session i.e. 30th Apxil, 2003. transfer. ations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequ I.A.No,8322/2002 stand disposed of. r the State was also directed to ure of prayer made 1‘11 this writ useful puxpose would be served ing as the same call be disposed 3 petition is disposed of with the 3r dated 14. 1 1.2002 shall not be With the aforesaid obsen Cextiiied copy as per rules. JLJ, i Sd/— P.C-Naik Judge {@W‘ Thereafter, the petitioner shall proceed to the‘place of ently, M.W.P.No. 1709/ 2002 and