WP(C) 4452/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T VAIPHEI Heard Mr A Ali, the learned counsel for the petitioner also heard Mr BK Sharma, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department. There is no dispute at the bar that this case is covered by WP (C) No. 4083/2010 . The case of the petitioner in brief, is that he was an applicant for ap pointment to the post of Anganwadi Worker at Kachichar Uttar Chuba Anganwadi Cen tre No. 164 (Mini centre). The petitioner claims that the private respondent, w ho have been selected as Anganwadi Worker does not belong to the place, where th e Anganwadi Center is located. According to the petitioner, the appointment of the respondent No.5 was not envi saged by the norms and guidelines and also by the advertisement. Be that as it m ay, as factual disputes have been raised by the petitioner, it will be more appr opriate for the Child Development Project Officer, Govt. of Assam (respondent No .3) to examine the grievances of the petitioner and thereafter take appropriate action in accordance with law. Order accordingly. The entire exercise shall be c ompleted by the respondent No.2 within two months from today. The petitioner will furnish a certified copy of this order as well as th e copy of the writ petition together with annexures to the respondent No.3 withi n seven days from today. If the petitioner is still aggrieved by the decision of the respondent N o.3, it shall be open to her to approach this Court again. The writ petition is disposed of with the above terms.