sat 1 wp 1342-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1342 OF 2011 Vinesh Karunakar Shetty ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mrs.B.P. Jakhade, Advocate appointed for the Petitioner. Ms.M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & U.D. SALVI, JJ. JULY 20, 2011 P.C. :- 1 We have heard Mrs.Jakhade, the learned Advocate appointed for the petitioner. 2 We have perused the petition received through jail and we have not noticed any specific instance pointed out by the petitioner when he was handcuffed either while taking to the court or bringing from the court to jail. The petition is on general averments sat 2 wp 1342-2011 and seeks directions to implement the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Prem Shankar Shukla vs. Delhi Administration (AIR 1980 SC 1535). 3 Though a law declared by the Supreme Court is binding and it has not been pointed that it has been violated in the case of the petitioner, the petitioner appears to be a busybody writing letters to the Registrar of this Court. The substantial prayer in this petition reads as : “This Hon’ble Court may kindly take up the issue and take appropriate action as per the directions given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in writ petition no.-(Civil) 22 of 1995 decided on 01/05/1995, Citizen of democracy, through its president, petitioner vs. State of Assam and other respondents reported in 1996, C.R.L. 73247.” 4 This is a frivolous petition and does not deserve any indulgence to be shown by us. 5 The petition is dismissed. sat 3 wp 1342-2011 6 A copy of this order be communicated to the petitioner. (U.D. SALVI, J) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J)