THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION Nos:23710 & 1050 OF 2005 DATED 12-04-2010 W.P.No.23710 of 2005: Between: Meghalaya Hotels (P) Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, Visakhapatnam. … PETITIONER And The Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Visakhapatnam & another. ... RESPONDENTS W.P.No.1050 of 2005: Between: Yedla Srinivasa Rao. … PETITIONER And Hotel Meghalaya, Rep.by its General Manager, Visakhapatnam & another. ... RESPONDENTS COMMON ORDER: As these two matters are between the same parties and they are interrelated, they are being disposed of by this common order. Both the learned counsel have fairly conceded that in view of the latest judgment of this Court, reported in MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF KURNOOL, REP.BY ITS COMMISSIONER SMT. K.VIJAYALAKSHMI v. A.PADMA REDDY & OTHERS [1], there cannot be any necessity of going into the question as to whether directly a claim petition under Section 2-A (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is maintainable or not. However, learned counsel appearing for the Management stated that the evidence need not be re-appreciated and therefore, the matter may be sent back to the Labour Court for reconsideration. The respondent-workmen has no objection for the same. Under those circumstances, the award, dated 23-07-2004 passed by the Labour Court in I.D.No.85 of 2001 is set aside and the matter is remitted to the Labour Court for fresh consideration on all the issues involved therein and dispose of the same as per law, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, Writ Petitions are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ C.V.RAMULU,J 12th April, 2010. Note: Furnish C.C. of the order within one week. B/o Tsy [1] 2007(2) ALT 386 (DB)