[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN. NO.263 OF 2007 IN APPEAL NO. 219 OF 2007 Bajirao Anna Kakade ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.Milind Deshmukh counsel for Applicant Ms.S.V.Gajre A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : MARCH 13, 2007 DATE : MARCH 13, 2007 DATE : MARCH 13, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant has been convicted under Section 304-II of IPC and is sentenced to R.I. for four years. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant states that the applicant was on bail throughout the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. This statement is not controverted by the prosecution. He has further submitted that [-2-] the appeal preferred by the applicant is not likely to be heard during the period of four years. Hence, he has prayed that the applicant be released on bail. 4. Looking to the evidence on record and the above position, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. 5. The applicant to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rs.Twenty thousand only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The applicant shall report to Pimpri Police Station, once in a month till the disposal of the appeal. 6. Application is disposed of. [ V.K.Tahilramani, J.]