IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FA No.65 of 2003 M/S NOBLE PRINTING INK PVT.LTD Versus ALLAHABAD BANK & ORS ----------- 41 18.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the appellant. A joint compromise application under Order 23 rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed. It appears that all the parties to this appeal, i.e. the appellant and the respondents have signed the application for compromise which is at flag-“J” Affidavit has also been filed in support of the same. I find no defect in the application and as such, the compromise application is according to law. It appears that Title Money Suit No. 57 of 1996 was filed which was decreed in favour of the respondent. During pendency of the appeal, both parties settled their disputes regarding the amount awarded and now the decree of the trial court has fully been satisfied. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the agreement is lawful and parties have compromised their disputes and pursuant to that, a compromise application has been filed. Parties are allowed to compromise the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed in terms of the compromise. Let a decree be prepared in terms of the 2 compromise and the compromise application shall form part of the decree. AKV/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)