C.R. No.6667 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.6667 of 2008 Date of Decision: 4.10.2010 Baldev Raj ……Petitioner VERSUS Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. and others ……Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- Present: Mr. S.K. Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 14.11.2008 passed by learned Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divi- sion), Ferozepur, whereby application moved by the de- fendant/petitioner herein under Order 7 Rule 11 (d) C.P.C. was rejected. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner/defendant states that in the present case no departmental proceedings was ini- C.R. No.6667 of 2008 -2- tiated against the defendant and straightway suit of recov- ery was filed against the defendant for the loss allegedly committed by the defendant. Learned Counsel for the de- fendant/petitioner further states that now before the learned trial Court evidence is almost complete and case is fixed for the final argument. 3. In view of the fact that both the parties have already led their evidence and case is listed for final argument before the learned trial Court, I do not wish to invoke my supervi- sory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of In- dia. 4. Petition is dismissed. However, it is made clear that suit itself shall be decided at its own merit and defendant shall be at liberty to argue on the point of maintainability of the suit which shall be decided by the learned trial Court with- out being prejudiced of the impugned order. ( ALOK SINGH ) 04th October, 2010 JUDGE ashish