:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. SUMMONS SUMMONS SUMMONS FOR FOR FOR JUDGMENT NO. 83 OF 2007 JUDGMENT NO. 83 OF 2007 JUDGMENT NO. 83 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 3330 OF 2006 NO. 3330 OF 2006 NO. 3330 OF 2006 Mr. Haresh K. Samatani. ... Plaintiff. V/s. M/s. Gurukrupa Overseas Trading Corpn. & Ors. ... Defendants. .... Mr. B.G. Vaidya for the Plaintiff. Mr. Rajesh Desai for the Defendant. .... CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. 03rd 03rd 03rd April 2007. April 2007. April 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . The Summary Suit is based on a memorandum of understanding that was arrived at between the parties on 2nd May 2006 in which the Defendant has acknowledged his liability. In pursuance thereof postdated cheques were furnished. The cheques were however, dishonoured on presentation. 2. No reply has been filed to the Summons of Judgment. The Defendant has been served and has :2: appeared through an Advocate. No dispute or defence whatsoever has been raised at the hearing of the Summons for Judgment. 3. In the circumstances, the Plaintiff would be entitled to a decree as prayed. The Summons for Judgement is made absolute. The suit shall stand decreed in terms of prayer clause (a). ----