IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1594 of 2006 RAJ KISHORE SINGH Versus BIRENDRA KUMAR DWIVEDI & ANR ----------- 2 06.01.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the opposite parties. After some arguments, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Accordingly, this Civil Revision application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, before parting with this Court would notice that an eviction suit of the year, 1993 is still being kept pending by the petitioner successfully for all these 16 years and the Court below unfortunately has found itself in a helpless situation because each and every interlocutory order is traveling to this Court in Civil Revision application. It is a different matter that all the these Civil Revision applications have been ultimately decided against the petitioner but then the petitioner’s interest of keeping the suit pending has been served till now and that is how a sixteen year old eviction suit is still pending for disposal before the Court below. Considering, the aforesaid aspect, this Court would direct the trial Court to ensure that the hearing of the suit is taken on day to day basis and is disposed of - 2 - within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Any further impediment if created by the petitioner should be ignored and in the event the petitioner chooses to not co-operate, the Court below can still proceed further and decide the matter even ex-parte. With the aforementioned observations this Civil Revision application is dismissed as withdrawn. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)