HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ PetitionIS) No. 854 of20{)8 PETITIONER Dhana Ram, aged about 60 years, S/o Late Shli Karu Meshram Occupation Gangnan (Labour) in permanent gang, oiiice of sub divisional officer, Sub Division N0. I, FWD, Durg, Tah. & Distt. Durg (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Public Works Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). g Engineer in Chief, Public Works Department, near Raj Bhawan, District Raipur (CG). 3. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, DiStt. Durg (CG). 4. The Sub Divisional Oificer, Sub Division, No. 1 Public Works Department, District Durg (CG). go (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotrb J.) resent : Shri Rakesh Anthony, Advocate for the petitioner. ,> Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 11 of Febmary, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner. fx who was appointed as daily wage labour in the establislunent";of respondents No. 1 and 2, seeks a relief that the petitioner, being pennanent Gang‘nan, be retired at the age of 62 years in accordance with the Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1967 (for short ‘the Act. 1967') read with Fundamental Rule 56. 2. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, die petitioner attained the status of permanent employee, as defined under Rule 2(c) of the Chhattisgarh (Workcharged and Corithigency Paid Employees) Pension Rules, 1979, ii'amed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India. Alter having attained the status of the permanent employee, the petitioner would retire on attaining the age of 62 years on superannuation under the provisions ofthe Act, 1967. /7/ . / / t P 4m January,‘ 2007 in Writ Petition No. 108 of2005 (Govind & others Kc. State of Ckhamsgarh and others) {2007(2) CGLJ. 29} and other connected matters. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents does not dispute the submissions made by leamed counsel appearlhg for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, who is permanent. Gangman, is entitled to of the Act, 1967. The petition is accordingly allowad subject to verification of fact astowhether the petitioner has acquired the status of permanent gangman. No order asto costs. E / sdl— . . Smash K. Agnmm Judge /