1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05/09/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR Writ Petition (MD)No.9923 of 2011 A.Selvaraj ..Petitioner Vs The Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli Corporation, Tiruchirappalli. ..Respondent Prayer :Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.03.2011 and to revoke petitioner suspension order in Na.Ka.No.H-2(Ariya) 1279/11 C7 (Maiam) dated 11.02.2011. For petitioner ...Mr.C.M.Arumugam For respondent ...No appearance O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition seeking for a mandamus directing the respondent to consider his representation, dated 01.03.2011. 2. Pleadings disclose that the petitioner has been suspended, pursuant to registration of a case in Crime No.101 of 2011 for the alleged offence under sections 294(b) and 336 of the Indian Penal Code. Further, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that review of suspension has to be made as per the Government order, but the same has not been enclosed in the typed set of papers. However, he seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 3. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No leave has been granted to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. No costs. SD ASST REGISTRAR ( Records ) /TRUE COPY/ RR SUB ASST REGISTRAR To The Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli Corporation, Tiruchirappalli. 1CC TO MR. C.M.ARUMUGAM,ADVOCATE, SR: 29768: DM:2011:SEPTEMBER:19:: Writ Petition No.9923 of 2011 1P:3C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/