Crl. Misc. No.M-27229 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-27229 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: September 7, 2011 Savita …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. Anil Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner submits that challan has been presented against her husband but she has got an apprehension that she will be involved in the case on the basis of statement made by Dharampal Rao under Section 161 Cr.P.C. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though the petitioner has not been challaned but in the report under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. submitted by the prosecution which was against her husband Bhushan Bhardwaj, it has been mentioned that challan will be presented against the petitioner and the brother of her husband. Crl. Misc. No.M-27229 of 2011 [2] The abovesaid circumstances indicate that no action has been taken against the petitioner till date in FIR, quashing of which has been sought for by the petitioner. This petition is disposed of as premature with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court again in case the petitioner is edited in the case on the basis of any material available against her. September 7, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE