IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2007 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 11619 of 2007(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ K.C.JOY, KOOZHITHALAVANATTU HOUSE, S.H.MOUNT P.O., KOTTAYAM-686006. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.THANU PILLAI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, FIRST CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, KOTTAYAM. BY SR.GOVT. PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED RAFIQ. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 11619 OF 2007-G ----------------------------------------- JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Exts.P4 and P7 orders. Against those orders, the petitioner has remedies under the K.G.S.T Act. Therefore, it is unnecessary for this Court to entertain this Writ Petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the assessing authority has ignored the directions in Ext.P3 appellate order of the Tribunal, while passing Ext.P4. I think, it is a ground which can be raised before the appellate authority and reliefs can be obtained from the said authority. In the result, the writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioner and his right to invoke the statutory remedies available to him. 3rd April, 2007. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. Nm/