IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7773 of 2010 PAPPU YADAV, S/O SDAGAR YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DAN NAGAR, P.S. & DISTRICT KHAGARIA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.3.2010. Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner, who is in custody in Khagaria Rail P.S. Case No.57 of 2009 for the offence under Sections 379, 328/34 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither the stolen mobile was recovered from his possession nor the petitioner was put on T.I.Parade and only on suspicion, the petitioner has been accused in this case. I have also heard Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. He vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that present case relates to the offence of administering intoxicant to the railway passenger and thereafter committing theft. In the present case, the informant was administered some - 2 - N.H./ drug and thereafter, his articles including one mobile was stolen. During investigation, the police found that the said stolen mobile was being used by this petitioner. Subsequently, the petitioner himself surrendered before the court and thereafter, he has been remanded since 16.12.2009. Learned counsel for the State further submits that the impugned order itself indicates that petitioner has got chequered history. In view of the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)