IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.599 of 2010 SOBHA DEVI WIFE OF MAHENDRA CHAUDHARY, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA SHEIKHPURA, RIDING ROAD, P.S. HAWAI ADDA, DISTRICT- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PATNA RANGE,PATNA 4. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 5. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATNA 6. OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, HAWAI AADDA POLICE STATION, PATNA 7. SMT. TUNIA DEVI, WIFE OF SRI AMERIKA CHAUDHARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHANANPUR, P.S. MASAURHI, DISTRICT- PATNA 8. SMT. GANDHIA DEVI, WIFE OF SRI ASHOK CHAUDHARY, RESIDENT OF FATUA, SOUTH OF GOVT. HOSPITAL, P.S. FATUA, DISTRICT- PATNA, BOTH RESPONDENT NOS. 7 & 8 PRESENTLY RESIDENT AT MOHALLA SHEIKHPURA, RIDING ROAD, P.S. HAWAI AADDA, DISTRICT PATNA ----------- 2 20.01.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite having a decree and possession effected through the process of the Civil Court in respect of the property in question, the private respondents forcefully evicted the petitioner and occupied the possession of the house in question, and therefore, the petitioner has lodged a criminal case against them vide Hawai Adda P.S. Case No. 26 of 2010. Learned counsel for the State submits that the prayer of the petitioner for directing the concerned police officials to give vacant possession of the house in question in favour of the petitioner can not be allowed. Considering the submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. However, it will be open for the petitioner to take remedial action before the appropriate forum as per law. It goes without saying that the criminal case lodged by the petitioner be investigated without unnecessary delay. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)