HE&%§:€;%URT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILA$PUR M.A. No. 42/2003 SB: Hon’ble Shri Justice R.L. Jhanwar Appellants Non applicants 1 Mst. Vishnu Kanti, aged about 23 years, wife of Dhanesh Kumar Dhanesh Kumar Jaiswal, aged about 27 years, son of Budhram, Both resident of Asandha RS. and ’I‘ahsil Sakti, District Janjgir Champa (CG) Versus Prahlad Yadav, aged about 5O yeals, son of Sunil Yadav Jeera Bai, aged about 45 yeals, wife of Prahlad Yadav both resident of Village Nandawakala, RS. and ’I‘ahsil Sakti, district Janjgir Champa APPEAL U/S 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT‘ 1988 Appearance: None for the appellants. None for the respondents. RESPONDENTS Applicants ORAL ORDER (13.4.201 1) The case is called out for hearing twice, but on both the occasions, none appears for the appellants or the respondents nor any representation is made on their behalf. Since there is no representation on behalf bf'both the par‘xjrzs, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the appeal for Want of prosecution. ~According1y, the appeal is dismissed forp@n of prosecution. Sd/— R.L. Jhanwar : Judge