IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL, AT NAINITAL. Writ Petition No. 109 of 2004 (S/B) Dr. P.K.Pandey ………………….. Petitioner Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others ………………..…. Respondents. ………. Writ Petition No. 358 of 2004(S/B) Dr. P.K.Pandey ………………….. Petitioner Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others ………………..…. Respondents. ……… Mr. Rajesh Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. J.P.Joshi, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State Mr. D.S. Patni, learned counsel for the Jal Nigam. Coram: Hon. V.S.Sirpurkar, C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Dated: 20.11.2004. PC: All the matters in writ petition no. 109 of 2004 (S/B) and 358 of 2004 (S/B)are covered in the jurisdiction of the Public Service Tribunal. The petitioner, for the reasons best known to him, has chosen to come directly to this Court. If he so chooses, he may approach the Public Service Tribunal. This Court refuses to take these matters as they pertain to the service of the petitioner and petitioner is admittedly a Government Servant. Accordingly, writ petitions are dismissed. However, learned members of the Public Service Tribunal are requested to take into consideration the pendency of these writ petitions before this Court while considering the question of limitation, if the petitioner chooses to move the Tribunal. (V.S.Sirpurkar,C.J.) ( Rajesh Tandon,J.) A