IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20854 of 2009 LALAN BANSFORE @ SWEEPER LALAN BANSFORE Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 30.06.2009 Heard both sides. The sole petitioner seeks regular bail in a case instituted under Sections 365/34 of the Penal code. The allegation in the F.I.R. is that three years old son of the informant was missing. It is the prosecution case that this petitioner disclosed to the informant that he had seen a woman taking away the minor son of the informant. It is contended that in the F.I.R. the informant has specifically alleged that she had serious suspicion that co- accused Chhotu Kumar has abducted/kidnapped her minor son. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. Referring to annexure- 2, which is an application filed by the informant in the court of learned Sessions Judge, it has been contended that she herself admitted that there is no role of the petitioner in the alleged offence. It appears that he is in custody since 29.03.2009. Record also indicates that co-accused Chhotu Kumar has already been granted the privilege of bail by this Court under order dated 08.05.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 8687/2009. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail 2 bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Rail Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Katihar Rail P.S.Case no. 5/2009. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)