to fcil .->. • <"•! 1' '••' ;'*''•:" u .^,-: *- ^.^tlpv r: 9€y^ C^] < IN THE HI£HCOURT OF JU&ICATURE AT BIL/tSPUR WRIT PETITTON (s) N0. 5-1^ of 2009 PETITEONER Vs RESPONDENTS ^'^" ^ ^^y ^^a^ J^F l^'/\..v' <^ S.D. Soni, son of Late L.L. Soni, aged about 6Z ye.ws, Retired Sr. T.O.A., B.S.N.L., BilaspurCCS^^o'-'T'^1^'^ . S^.as^i-^^J 1. BharatSanchar Nigam Limited, Circle, through the Chief Seneral Manager, Chhattisgarh Circle, Khamahardih, Raipur. 2. The Seneral Manager, Bharat Sanchar Ni9am Limited, Bilaspur (C6) , 3. Smt. J.V. Naidu, Retired Sr. T.O.A., B.S.N.L., Bilaspur (C6). WRIT PETErEON UNDER AKH.CLE 226 OF THE CONSrETUTION OF IN&IA ^ ^litiuhe'ltni vs. ^ 's-s' s^^^. ^s's'^y's-s HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BtLASPUR WRIT PETiTiON (S) N0. 5116 OF 2009 :0- PETiTiONER RESPQNDEMTS S.D.Soni Versus Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limried & Others Gcsw' (Writ petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon'tsie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Dinesh R.K. Tiwari, counsei forthe petitioner. Ms SharmiSa Singhai, counsei for respondents No.1 & 2. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on th's 10m dayof September, 2009) 1. Heard learned counse! for the parties. 2. This matter arises from the dispute beiween the empioyee of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (for short "BSNL") and the management of BSNL. 3. Learned counsei for the petitioner submits that an appropriate writ can be issued so that the cause of action as required under Section 19 of the Adminisfrative Tribunais Act, 1985 (for short "the Act, 1985") is created and the petitioner can, thereafter, approach the Centrai Administrative Tribunal (for short "the CAT"). 4. The prayer made by the learned counsd for the petitioner is unusual. How can a writ be issued to pass some order creatina a cause of action to enable the Detitioner to make an aoplteation before the CAT a competent Tribunat to decide the service disputes between the employee of BSNL and the management of BSNL. 5. Under the notification dated 31si Ootober, 2008 issued by the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Departrrient of Personnei and Training), Government of india under sub-seolion (2) of Section 14 of the Act, 1985, ihe CAT has been authorized to deai with any service disputes ofthis nature. 6. !n view of foregoing, the writ petition is liable to be and is accordlngly dismissed ai the motion slage itself, as not maintainable. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge