S. B. Civil Second Appeal No.293/2005. (Legal Representatives of Dule Singh v. Khemsingh & Another) Date of Order : : 08-01-2007 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.B.L.Chaudhary, for appellant. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The two courts below have concurrently held that the appellant is not in possession of the property. It is also admitted from the record that the appellant failed to plead that he became onwer of the property. The First Appellate Court also observed that even name of 'Bara' which plaintif discloses had not been mentioned by the plaintiff in the plaint. In sum and substance, the two courts below recorded the finding of fact against the appellant in relation to possesion of the property and no substantial question of law is involved in the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. Scd.