—78 sn^v w h-i 'HSff 3IT^T ?h*ll=h ^s^^flVvPf, e-^WIG, (sj<rtiyy< uc^ 1^£/^> 3n^ Traq; (1cifl'!l'iET) i ^aWHfersii^r ADplicants Respondent (Application fgl Sinale Bench: Hon'b 11^-2007 Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Panei Lsl None for the respondent. Heard and perused the appij <*l-t<T<!i4l*i HiH^rf ^t\fec£t'<r^4^.l< ^? aifilT ail^l ptate of Chhattisgarh, Through the peoretary, Gramodyog Vibhag, D.K.S. Phawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, ;hhattisgarh. 2. The Director, Department of periculture, Sona Khan Bhavan, Ring poad, Teli Bandha, Raipur, ;hhattisgarh. ^ersus p.K. Tiwari, Aged about 36 years, S/o phri D.P. Tiwari, Working as Assistant prade-lil, Directorate of Serioulture, paipur, Chhattisgarh, •extension oftime) e Mr. Justice L.C. Bhadoo ^er for the State/applicants. cation. It has been mentioned iiji the application that on acoount of preparation of Assembly elections, [the representation could not be decided within a period of 30 days. The order impugned was passed on 29-8-2003 and the petitioner B.K. Ti\vari (respondent herein) | was a!lowed ten days time to file representation, that was required |to be filed on or before 9-9-2003 and thereafter the representation was required to be decided by 9-10-2003 whereas the Assembly elections w^re in the last week of November, 2003, therefore, there is no justifioation in |:he prayer made for. Accordingly, the M.C.C. reqijiiresto be dismissed and it is accordingly dismissed. ! i ___- Sdf- L.C.BHADOO Judge