IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 22445 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.10.2011 Neela Singh .. Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Sansar Kundu, Advocate for Mr. A. S. Sivia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P. S. Bajwa, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per the allegations in the FIR, the petitioner was armed with a Sota and no specific injury has been attributed to him. He is in custody since 1.3.2011. He further submitted that main accused, namely, Gurbhagat Singh, to whom injury under Section 307 IPC has been attributed, has already been granted regular bail. Learned counsel for the State did not dispute the aforesaid facts. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions, noticed above, in my opinion, the petitioner deserves concession of bail pending trial. He is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Sri Muktsar Sahib. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 12.10.2011 mk