IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8662 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 12, 2010. Jagjeet Kumar and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Kamaldeep Singh Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. Notice of motion. Mr.Kamaldeep Singh Sidhu, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of the order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 29.09.2008 (Annexure P-2) whereby their appointments as ETT Teachers (Teaching Fellows) have been cancelled and their services dispensed with on the ground that the `experience certificates' relied upon by them at the time of C.W.P.No .8662 of 2010 2 selection have been found to be bogus. The petitioners, on the other hand, reiterate that the `experience certificates' produced by them are genuine. Alternatively, it is averred by the petitioners that even if no marks are awarded to them for the `experience', still they make it to the merit list. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case has already been settled in Civil Writ Petition No.11111 of 2009 (Parminder Kaur versus State of Punjab and others), decided on 18.3.2010. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the aforesaid Parminder Kaur's case (supra). Dasti. May 12, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE