IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30933 of 2009 PINTOO MAHTO @ RANJIT KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 28.10.2009 Heard. In the F.I.R. which was lodged on the day of the occurrence, i.e., 14.1.2006, none was named in it as an accused. On the next date, i.e., on 15.1.2006 not only the informant but some of the witnesses also started naming the petitioner and other accused persons with some weapons or alleged being identified for committing the offence. The contention is that this anomaly does not get properly explained as to why the name of the accused did not appear in the F.I.R. Under the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, namely, Pintoo Mahto alias Ranjit Kumar be released from custody on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawadah, in Warsaliganj P.S.Case No. 9 of 2006. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)