IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1083 of 2010 RAMASHISH SHARMA Versus RAM LALL & ORS. ----------- 7. 29.9.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. I.A. No.8471 of 2010 has been filed for condoning the delay of one day in preferring this M.J.C. application. In view of the statements made in paragraph nos.3 to 5, it appears that there was reasonable cause preventing the petitioner in preferring this M.J.C. application after delay of one day. In the above view of the matter, I.A. No.8471 of 2010 is allowed and the delay of one day in preferring this M.J.C. application is hereby condoned. Now, I proceed to consider M.J.C. No.1083 of 2010 on its own merit. This application has been filed for restoration of Civil Revision No.1290 of 2007 which stood dismissed for want of prosecution on 11.2.2010. On being satisfied with the sufficiency of reasons furnished in this application for omission on part of the petitoner, the same is allowed and the Civil Revision 2 No.1290 of 2007 is restored to its original file and number. Post Civil Revision No.1290 of 2007 ‘for Admission’ on Wednesday next, i.e., 6.10.2010 as a first case. P.S. ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)