.5 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE :: BSLASPUR BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ. PETSTiONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITEON No. 5964 OF 2005 Chhotelal Tamboli, aged about 55 years, S/o Ramji Tambo!i, R/o Ratanpur, Tahsii Kota, Distt. Biiaspur Versus 1. Chaitram, aged 60 years, S/o Ramjt Tambo!! 2. Kishore Kumar, aged 35 years, S/o Chaitram Tamboli 3. Rajesh kumar, aged 30 years, S/o Chaitram Tamboli 4. Santosh Kumar, aged 38 years, S/o Bhagyat Prasad Tamboii 5. Ashok Kumar, aged 35 years, S/'o Bhagvat Prasad Tamboli. 6. Manoj Kumar, aged 30 years, S/o Bhagvat Prasad Tamboli 7. Maniram, S/o Kanhaiya Lai Thawait, A!l R/o Village Ratanpur, Tahsii-Kota, Distt. Biiaspur (CG) 8. Krishna Kumar, S/o Ram Khiiawan Suryavanshi, R/o vlllage Madanpur, Tahsil & Distt. Bilaspur (CG) 9. Chhattisgarh Govt. through Coilector Bilaspur (CG) 10. lilrd Addl. District Judge Bilaspur (CG) Present: Mr. Kamai Pandey, iearned counse! for the petitioner. ORAL (Passed on 9th December 2005) Shri Kamal Paiidey, learaed couiisel for tlie petitioner. Having heard the learo.ed counsel for the petitioner, I do not fhicl aiiy jurisdictional flaw or error apparent on tiie face of the 76 record or manifest iajustice. The wiit petition filed under Article 227 of fhe Constitzition of India is Bieritiess. No case is iQiacle out. Therefore, fhe writ petition is disniisse.d, however, wifh no order as to costs. Sd/- Chief Justice ^^^.V-s^