IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15659 of 2010 1. AKHILESHWAR MEHTA @ AKHILESH MEHTO SON OF LATE BIRO MEHTA 2. NIRMALA DEVI WIFE OF AKHILESHWAR MEHTA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.5.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the allegation against the petitioner no.1 is of having assaulted the deceased, who is his own daughter, due to which she died and thereafter he buried her, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner no.1. The prayer for bail of petitioner no.1 Akhileshwar Mehta @ Akhilesh Mehto is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. With regard to the petitioner no.2, considering that she is a lady and is in custody since 4,1,2010, let the petitioner no.2 Nirmala Devi be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.IV, Purnia in S.T.No.881 of 2009 arising out of Dhamdaha P.S.case No.53 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any - 2 - change in the address of the petitioner and (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )