1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR C.A.F. NO. 369/10 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 2154/10 Union of India .vs. Shri Jagganath S. Piske & another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. DATE : 18 th FEBRUARY, 2010. Heard Mr. Lambat, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. S.K. Sable, learned Counsel for the respondents. Mr. Lambat submits that the delay caused is due to administrative and procedural aspects of the matter. The details are given in paragraph nos. 2, 3 & 4. These reasons are good and sufficient. The delay is condoned. The application stands allowed. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 370/2010 : Heard Mr. Lambat, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. S.K. Sable, learned Counsel for the respondents. Ad-interim stay to the judgment and decree 2 dated 30.9.2009 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur in Claim Application No. 51/OA-II/RCT/NGP/2007 on depositing the entire decretal amount in this Court within a period of six weeks from today. Judge J.