IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29075 of 2011 Dadan Singh, son of Late Ramanand Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3. 29.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 325, 326, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that there is an allegation against the petitioner of having fired at the deceased, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. Since there is considerable material in the case diary to suggest that in fact, the Informant and their parties were aggressor and had even assaulted the Police Party which had gone to verify the ownership of the land concerned and a reasonable suspicion has been raised that the land in fact, belongs to the petitioner, he is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge if his case is not bifurcated. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)