IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR -3 WRIT PETITION NC83/20QS ISiBli KO! PETITIONER (S) ..••"'\^ /•^^•^ oA^""" ^SN?D.--""" ^•"^'^>-" ^ ^y^: ..-••" '0-/ c5^=^y •^,^ '€ f^"^'%' ^-^' ''^'K^~!'w"v-^-:'^ RESPONDENT(S) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Water Resources Department Mantralay Bhawan Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Water Resources Department Governement of M.P. (Now Chhattisgarh) Through Engineer-ln-Chief Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Water Resources Department Governement of M.P. (Now Chhattisgarh) Through Executive Engineer Water Resources Maniyari Div. Mungeli,Distt.Bilaspur(C.G.) Krishna KumarSahu S/o Narmada Prasad Sahu R/o Village & Post - Kargi Kala, Teh. Kota,Distt.BilaspurC.G.) -2- \ •»i, 2. Presiding Officer Industrial Court Raipur (C.G.) 3. Presiding Officer LabourCourt Bilaspur (C.G.) \ APPLICATION UNDERARTICLE227nF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .3^,--£..iL--^-?T.'-:-^-^'*^^>-^S^^- :iai MV1K: ?ls^^^ iSIS. »» %3 BBSSiBi IS'S'KiS' SSiSSS' 'S'WSiiiSSi1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARM AT BLLASPUR (Hon. h/tr. JusticePritinker Diwaker) Writ Petition No. 83 of 2006 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh and others Krishna Kumar Sahu and others ^ 'Wfl^ Shri Pravin Das Dy. G.A. for the State/petitioners. Shri N. K. Vyas, counsel for the respondents WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2270FJHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORD E R (14.09.2010) Challenge in this petition te to the orders dated 21.9.2005 and: 9.2.2000 (Annexures P-1 and P-2 respectively) passed by the| Industria! Court and the Labour Court by which respondent No.1 wast .directed to be reinstated with back wages. j 2. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that during the; pendency of this petition respondent No. 1 has not only been reinstated! ? . .fii. but has also been regularized vide order dated 14.8.2008 (AnnexuFel.^, R-1/6). As regards back vvages, counsel for respondent No.1 fairly; . submsts that in view of the order dated 19.2.2009 passed in Writ| Petition No. 273/2006 (State of Chhattisgarh v. Dauwa and others) the;, respondent No.1 isnot entitled forthe same. | r • " 3. Thus in the facts and circumstances of the case and submissioDi ,made by counsel for the parties, nothing survives in this petition to be| . adjudicated. The petition is accordingty disposed of. 1 SdA I Pritinker Diwaker i Judge