Cr.Misc. M 28852 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 28852 of 2010 Date of decision:29.9.2010 Sangita Petitioner vs. State of Haryana Respondent Present: Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. Notice of motion. On the asking of the court Ms.Gursreet Kaur, Dag, Haryana accepts notice. Copy supplied. On account of cruelty of private respondents, an FIR was registered at the instance of petitioner- complainant u/s 498-A/328/406 IPC at P.S. Civil Lines, Rohtak. The petitioner seeks the transfer of the trial of respondents 2 to 4 from Rothak to Hisar on the ground that there would be threat to her life in case she goes from Hisar to Rohtak to pursue her case as a complainant or to appear as a witness. She claims that she has been threatened by respondents 2 to 4 that she would be killed in case she comes to Rohtak. It is further submitted that the petitioner has filed an application u/s 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act at Hisar and that respondent No.2 Ashish Rai Miglani, in any case, has to attend the matrimonial proceedings at Hisar. I have considered the contention of counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner being a complainant is not required to appear on each date of hearing. Her interest can always be watched by a counsel, engaged by her at Rohtak. However, it is directed that in case the petitioner has got an imminent danger of threat to her life on her visit to Rohtak court, it will be Cr.Misc. M 28852 of 2010 2 open to her to submit a representation to S.P. Rohtak. S.P. Rohtak will ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioner on any date of hearing in the criminal case, registered at her instance. No ground for transfer is made out as all the official witnesses will be unnecessarily harassed along with private respondents in case the trial is transferred from Rohtak to Hisar. Dismissed. September 29 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE