IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 30748 of 2011 Amrik Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, DAG, Punjab, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The complainant is present in person. She has stated before me that a sum of `8 lacs was paid to the petitioner for sending her son abroad. She has just been paid a sum of `3 lacs, whereas the remaining amount is yet to be paid. In these circumstances, I am not inclined to invoke extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash the FIR. The petitioner must face the rigors of law, if he has violated the same. Dismissed. November 30, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE