1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1529 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.2333 OF 2009 Vinita Estate Pvt.Ltd. .. Plaintiffs Versus Abdul Rehman Qureshi and Ors. .. Defendants Mr.D.D.Madon, Senior Advocate with Mr.Parimal Shroff, Mr.Deokar i/b. Parimal Shroff and Co. for plaintiffs M/s.Haresh Mehta & Co. for defendant Nos. 1 and 2. Mr.Javeed Hussein for defendant Nos. 3, 4, 6 to 9 and 11 to 13 Mr.Sudheer Phadke for defendant Nos. 14, 15 and 16. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : December 3, 2009. P.C.: 1] This is a chamber summons to bring on record the heirs of deceased defendant No.5. Further, it is stated by the plaintiffs that amendment is necessitated because it was pointed out that the rights of the defendant No.1 to 10 have been taken over by defendant No.3. Therefore, this application for amendment. The parties have been duly served as is evident by the affidavit proving service. 2 2] The Advocate for the deceased defendant No.5 states that he has instructions from the heirs to appear and waive service of the writ of summons. He will file his vakalatnama within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of this order. Further, the defendant No.17 (proposed)/ respondent No.2 is duly served, according to Mr.Madon, learned Senior Counsel appearing for plaintiffs. 3] For the reasons set out in the affidavit in support and since there is no affidavit filed in reply, the chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendments to be carried out within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Amended copy to be served on all parties within a period of two weeks, thereafter. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)