IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No.857 of 2005 Date of Decision:- 21.1.2008 Padam Singh ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate vs. Sh.S.K.Goel ....Respondent(s) through Mr.R.S.Kundu, Addl.A.G., Haryana. *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) Vide order dated April 2, 2002 passed by this Court, C.W.P.No.4541 of 2002, the petitioner was permitted to make representation which was to be considered in the light of a previous judgment of this Court, which, in turn, is based upon two judgments passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Concededly, the petitioner's claim has been duly considered by the State Government and the Financial Commissioner-cum-Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department, Haryana has passed the order dated 9.6.2006, a copy of which has been appended as Annexure R-1 with the reply/affidavit filed by S.K.Goel, the then Deputy Commissioner, Sirsa. Since the directions issued by this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents, no case to continue with these C.O.C.P. No.857 of 2005 -2- proceedings is made out. Consequently, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to impugn the aforementioned speaking order before the Competent Authority, if so advised or required. Rule discharged. January 21, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE