AGK AGK AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION NO._____ OF 2009 IN SALES TAX APPLICATION (L) NO.118 OF 2008 WITH DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION NO._____ OF 2009 IN SALES TAX APPLICATION (L) NO.119 OF 2008 WITH DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION NO._____ OF 2009 IN SALES TAX APPLICATION (L) NO.120 OF 2008 WITH DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION NO._____ OF 2009 IN SALES TAX APPLICATION (L) NO.121 OF 2008 WITH DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION NO._____ OF 2009 IN SALES TAX APPLICATION (L) NO.122 OF 2008 WITH DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION NO._____ OF 2009 IN SALES TAX APPLICATION (L) NO.123 OF 2008 The Additional Commissioner of Sales Tax (BST), Mumbai ..Applicant. V/s. Technocom Systems (India) Private Limited, Nasik ..Respondent. DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION NO._____ OF 2009 IN SALES TAX APPLICATION (L) NO.124 OF 2008 WITH DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION NO._____ OF 2009 IN SALES TAX APPLICATION (L) NO.125 OF 2008 WITH DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION NO._____ OF 2009 IN SALES TAX APPLICATION (L) NO.126 OF 2008 WITH DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION NO._____ OF 2009 IN SALES TAX APPLICATION (L) NO.127 OF 2008 WITH DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION NO._____ OF 2009 IN SALES TAX APPLICATION (L) NO.128 OF 2008 WITH DRAFT NOTICE OF MOTION NO._____ OF 2009 IN SALES TAX APPLICATION (L) NO.2 OF 2009 The Additional Commissioner of Salex Tax (BST), Mumbai ..Applicant. V/s. Huzaifa Furniture Industries Private Limited, Nasik ..Respondent. Mr.V.A. Sonpal, AGP for the applicant. Mr.P.V. Surte for the respondent. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 4TH MARCH, 2009. P.C. : 1. Leave under Rule 141 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (O.S.) Rules, 1980 granted to the applicant to take out Notice of Motion in terms of the Draft Notice of Motion handed in. Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to get all the notice of motions registered on or before 18th March, 2009. 2. In view of the judgment in Notice of Motion No.2183 of 2006 in Sales Tax Application Lodging No.12 of 2006 Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. L.H. Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. L.H. Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. L.H. Polymers dated 2nd November 2007 Polymers dated 2nd November 2007 Polymers dated 2nd November 2007, delay cannot be condoned. Hence, all the notice of motions are dismissed. (Judge) (Judge)