IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36304 of 2009 1. Nirmal Kumar Banka, son of Sri B. P. Banka, resident of Devi Market, City Chowk, PS City, District Patna. 2. Bijay Kumar Banka, son of Sri B. P. Banka, resident of Anand Sri Vastralaya, City Chowk, PS City, District Patna, presently residing at House No. 903, Near Indraprastha, Baghdadabad, Gujrat – Petitioners. Vs. 1. The State of Bihar, 2.Sajjan Kumar Rungta, son of Late Banwari Lal Rungta, Rungta Synthatics, Patliputra Market (Ist Floor), Sabzibagh, PS Pirbahore, Dist. Patna – Opp. parties. 2. 29.10.2009 Counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the informant are present in court and draw this court’s attention to the compromise petition which is at Annexure 2 of this application. In the said compromise petition it is stated that both the parties have settled the matter out side the court and do not want to proceed any further with the case. In this case cognizance has been taken for the offences under sections 406 and 420 of the Penal Code in Complaint Case No. 1790©/1999. Section 406 of the Penal Code is compoundable by the owner of the property with respect to which breach of trust has been committed and section 420 of the Penal Code is similarly compoundable by the person who has been cheated. Considering that the parties have compromised this matter and there is no need to proceed with the case, I quash the order taking cognizance, dated 9.3.2000 passed in Complaint Case No. 1790©/1999 by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patna. This application is, thus, disposed of. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)