IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1480 of 2006 ARVIND KUMAR SINGH & ANR Versus MOST.RAJESHWARI DEVI & ANR ----------- 3 28.11.2008 Heard counsel for petitioners. The approach of the Court below in rejecting the application for intervention and impleadment filed by the plaintiff-petitioners on 8.5.2006 in a partition suit of the year 1999, on the ground that purchasers in whose favour sale deeds were executed either by the plaintiffs or defendants during the pendency of the suit were not necessary/proper parties, is correct and needs no interference by this Court. The doctrine of lis-pendence would definitely come in the way of the plaintiff- petitioners and therefore, if the Court below has noted in the impugned order that such application was wholly belated and was filed at the stage of arguments only with a view to delay the disposal of the suit, the same cannot said to be vitiated by any jurisdictional error. That being so, this Civil Revision application is misconceived and is hereby dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)