1 3254.05 Cri.Appln. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3254 OF 2005 ( Govindrao S/o Panditrao Saraf V. The State of Maharashtra & anr ) in CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 398 OF 2004 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Shri A.B. Kharosekar, Advocate for appellant Shri N.H. Borade, APP for respondent/ Stte ..... CORAM : U.D. SALVI, J. DATED : 28 th November, 2011. 1. On instructions statement is made on behalf of the applicant that the applicant Govindrao S/o Panditrao Saraf expired in December, 2009, and as such the proceedings need t o be put to rest. 2. It is further submitted on behalf of the applicant that the applicant/ accused was convicted in the case R.C.C. No. 2414/1999 for the commission of offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Aurangbad on 12-11-2003, and this order was 2 3254.05 Cri.Appln. upheld in Criminal Appeal No. 153/2003 by the I Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad. It appears that Mr. Amarchand S/o Tarachand Agrawal died during the pendency of the Revision Application No.398/2004 preferred for challenging the conviction of the applicant, and the application for taking legal heirs of the deceased complainant was made. . Criminal Application No. 3254/2005 as well as Criminal Revision Application No. 398/2004 and Criminal Application No. 2265/2004 have become infructuous, and as such stand disposed off accordingly. ( U.D. SALVI, J. ) SDM*