CR No. 2151 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 2151 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.03.2011. Rajeshwar Kumar .......Petitioner Vs. Singh Ram & others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Sanjeev Pandit, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... SABINA, J. Plaintiff-petitioner has filed a suit for permanent injunction. Vide the impugned order dated 22.3.2011, the evidence of the plaintiff was closed. Hence, the present petition by the plaintiff. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that although the affidavit of the petitioner was ready but he could not appear before the trial court as a witness on account of his illness. Petitioner be granted only one opportunity to enable him to examine himself as a witness or any other witness, necessary to be examined. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves to be allowed. The evidence of the plaintiff was closed vide CR No. 2151 of 2011 (O&M) -2- impugned order dated 22.3.2011 as plaintiff had already been granted two opportunities to conclude his evidence. In case, the petitioner is allowed to conclude his evidence, the dispute between the parties would be disposed of on merits. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. The trial court is directed to allow the petitioner to lead his entire evidence on 8.4.2011, the date fixed before the trial court. (SABINA) JUDGE March 28, 2011 Gurpreet