66 0 9J a CWPN029140f2010 In theIlighCourtofPunjab andIlaryana at Dateofdecisloitl11082OlO 1 CWI No 2914 012010 Vs Stateofl laryana and others 2 CWP No 6427of2009 a Krishan Kumar and olhers Vs StatcofHalyanaand othcrs 0 3 CWPN03329 of2010 C0 I RaibirSingllandothersVs Stateof l IalyalllinciothcrS 0 4 CWP No 403 of2009 Z Prcm SiItvl Vs Stlotc fllarvnllailltl tboi c m 5 CWP No3401 nf2010 r er liIIC Kuibir Singhand anotherVs Sttllctfllaryatlaalld olllcis X c6 6 CWP No7536 of201 0 CO Kplan Singh otllcrs Cr mwo 7 CWPN0203 of2010 Z Qm Desh Raiand otllers Vs StateofJJilrytlllotiild 01111rS 8 CWPN0 8147 of2010 EHC Ram Mehar and othersVs Stolcof11811a 3tld ll150r11 1 9 CWP No 6443 of2009 C Jai PoJ and another Vs StateofllaryoIlaalld otllors 10 CWP No6619 of2009 SatyawanEHC Vs State of Hnryanaand otllers 11 CWP No10487of2009 Head Constablc Ashok Kuinar Vs Slute 0fl laryanaand olhcrs J2eCWP No12237 0f200 Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 67 1e Cr CWPNo29140f2010 2 NarenderKumar ConstableVs StateofIlaryanaandothers 13CWPN0122480f2009 Jit SinghEHC Vs State and others 14 CWPN0 12253of2009 SubhashChanderEHC Vs Stateof Haryana and othcrs 1 C 15 CWPNo16975of2009 0 Krishan Kumar EHC Vs Slaic of Huryuna alld otloers Ca 16 CWP No 18430of2009 I 5 Panna Lal EHC Vs StateofHaryana and others C C 17 CWPNo8863 of2009 Z RajKumar and anotherVs StateofHaiyanaand others C 18CWPNo18919of2009 Kamal Parkash EHC Vs StateofHaryana and otllcrs 06 19 CWP No636 of2010 co t LadyConstabl Rojbala Vs St310nfHc7rvanaand others e Z 20 CWP Nc2775 of2010 m Rishi Parshadand othersVs StateofHaryana and others 21CWPN028750f2010 r LadyConstable SuinanVs StateofHwyanaand otllers 22 CWP No 2968 of2010 4ea Sada Ram EHC Vs State ofHalyana and othcrs 23 CWPNo 3338 of2010 KaptainSingLiind another VsStntc ofHaryanaandlltllels 24 CVo Nc122619f2919 EHC Mohan Lal Vs State ofHaryanand others Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 68 4 b CWPN02914of2010 3 25 CWP N3556 of2010 HansRam and othersVs StateofHaryana and others 26 Cl18N04258 of2010 9 7 2 Hari KrishalilIC Vs Financial 1 8 PrincipalSecrltall to 6OlllmlSSlOncr GovernmentofHatyana and others 27 CWP NoA274 of2010 m ct Amar SinghEHC Vs StateofHaryana and others 0 Cs 28 CWP NoA749 of2010 I MohinderSinghEASI andanother 0 Vs Statcofkryanaanclothers I 29 CWP NoA765 of2010 e Z ChhajuRain and anotherVs StateofHaryona and others W7 3054Tl4060 of2010 e we vel e 1 re C 4t Raibir Singhand othersVs StaleofHaryunaalld otllcls a5 31 CWPN074963of2010 CCl SatbirSinghVs StateofHaryana and othcrs VW Z 32 CWP No 7923 of2010 Il Jaivir Singhand othersVs State and others 33 CWPN0 6031 of2010 Hardayal HC andothersVs StateofHaryaIIa and otllcrs 4e CORAMO HONBLE MR JUSTJCE PERMOD KOHLI Present Mr SK Redhu MrVikram SinghMreSeN Yadav VO5llal MrPritEun SMrldmba IvllRP Singh Advocatesfor the petitioners MrJS Kundu Addl AG Haryanafortlle respondents PERMOD KOHLI J Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 69 m PN029140012010 aeartr 4 a On the basisof COillnlOn and identicalissucs both ofactswld Oil IaW all thesepetitions are beingdecidcdbythis common order The entirecontrovcrsyrclatesto the of Rule 137 ofthe PunjabPolice Rules 1934 tIs applicable to tlle State and ameildedvide PunjabPolice Hatyana Amelldinent RuJes 2001 m C hereinafterreferredto as the Rulesl This rule relatcsto for 0 0 Lower SchooJCourseand for enlisting of the eligibleofllcers 111List Bl 4 for thcir prolnotion 17e 3nended ruic subjcctmatter 01 dcbatc in lhe C5 presenrIvrit petltionsis reproduced hcreunderl 1 37Selcction of caildidatesfor admissionto Z courses at thc Police TrainingCollegell list 2 C 14t B in Foml 131 shall be maintained by cach 08 of Policc It shail include the CO names of all crlisttIblcs selccted for Cr 7 Z to thc Lowcr Scllool Course to be held at the tle Pce TrainingCullegeSelection to lhe list 13 Sllall be llliadc 111 the month of Janllarycacll 1 year and shall be limited to the number of seats allottedllo thc districl fclrthe year he nulnbcr C of seats in Lower School Course in a year shall be on the basis of existingvacancics and thc vacancies likely to bc created within one ycar Itl the respcctiveunit 55Io of the seats allotted to a unit ill lohe Lolver School Course shall be fllletl in on the basis of a colnpetitivc Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 70 a CWP N02914 of2010 5 examinaOOll 35 on thc basisof cumefltnessand 100Ioon thc basisof consistent in Gold or Silver Med21i11All IndiaPolice AlleetlNalicllaIGalrlesur displa5 of m Q 0 braverycluring lhe course of of 0 CaO officialdutySelectionofpersonsagainst50 I C5 seats lll 1istllower school on the basis of rnerit shall be done by a Promotion Z Committee011 thc basisofl m r 1 1Examination ofservice Z 08 2 A lest called 131 CO et testl1111 W2 Z 3 CL a9Prade b1Law and practicalpolicework aild 3 An Interviewe 2 All constables of their n educational qualificatioilsshall bc eligibleto appearforlel tes ifthey are under thc age of 35 years and have coinplcted 5 years of service on 1 day ofJnnuary ofthe year Ill which selectioll lS made l1owever if a Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 71 4 0 cwPNo9140f2010 bclongingto reservedcalcgory aller attainingthc agc of 27 whois yearsas per he shall be allowed to appearfor minimulnthree chances aftcr m olfservicceven if he tr of flve years the age of 35 years up to a 0 has C 2C 0f 10ycars 4a0 1C C All Constables irrespectiveof their 0il Z shallbc eligible 10 a tr be brouglllOllList 131 seniority cunl nlerll 08 if tlleyarc under the age of 40 years CO have 5 yearsof servicc011 the C and mw which Z day 0 Januaryof the ycar ln first Clw JS lllacIe 19 datcd138 2007 The of Haoana issuedinstroctions theminimum mcrit to fulfill tlle criteriafor senionty thcobservationsof this Courtin the case of cummfltness relyinguopon C KumarVs Stale of and others CWP No952 of Naresh decided on 05112004 Dircctor General of Police klaryana benchmarks for instructions prescribingllllllllllUln issued list under 35Io quotu lhe elevantextract Of th selectionto B CWi Nu6427 ul 64nncxt1rePm79tll Jated Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 72 S CWP No914 of2010 7 2009 is hereunder 3 In vievvofthe Honblc Iligh 111the Naresh Kumar case supralit has been decidedto flx tlle bench marksfor fltnessunder 354 qLIOta he Ct assessnlento f service record sliould be tnailc 0 C3 on the basis of education tramillgcourses I passedcommcndation certiflcates aild Iength C5 I of service ctc as givcnin PPR 137 All the Cr Z candidates who obtain a ininlilislT 11 1 rn2 or morc would be deeined tcl be flt for C c C selection of B l scats against35Io quotaon the or5 baslsof intcroescseniorityof the candidatesand co f fur all such caildidates intermsescnioritv wollld eA Z be the sole criteria for deputingon their turn Ll under 350IoquutaIll Vlew 011the explicitordcr of Hgh Court Plcase take further necessary action 99 The validityof these instructions has been upheldby this Court in Hawa Singh Vs StntcclfI3nrv0naaod others CWP Noe1 194 of2005Jdecided011141520080 There Lire lhree sets of writ petitionsunder consideration The same are broadlycategorisedin the following manncrl a9 the eligibility ofthe candidates who appearedin 55Io merill Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 73 L ea CWPN029140f2010 8m quotaunderRule 137 11tu bc considcredfor under35 oil basis urlclcftule 137 621iil el1eio if theyhavefailed under550Ioquota b considerationof the candidateswith less than 35 years of age 21S on Ist dayof Januaryof the year iil which selection is made in 35Io m Q quotaof 0 C 1 interse seniorityof the caondidateson tllc basis of beilcll marks Ca3 I Itl termsof DGPs instructionsdated 13022007 C the readingofRulc 137 l l it emt2cs 29 followsl 4t Z 6a1 that 55Io of thc scats allolted lo a ilnit in the Jower School Course are nleant to be fil led 111 Oll tllc basis of C 4r examlnatlOll I 08 bl 35Ioofthe seats on the basis alld CQ 6cl 10Io seats on the basis of consistcntl l lol mavo Z etc tl Selection against550Ioquota IS to be made by the Promotional Committee Ail the cuiistutio7 rlosIt015 2 17 ofllheir educational whtl Iirc lcs Ihatl 35 years 01ageaild have conlpleted5 years of servlCe on Ist dayofJanuaryofthe ycar of C selection are eJigibJeto appear for I3mltest under merit seats of 55Io quota Similarly all the constables irrespcclive of thcir educationalqualication havingcompletedflve years of service and in the age of 40 years on the lst dayof Januaryof the year of selection Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 74 0 al CWP No914 of2010 9 are eligibleto be brought on Iist B l on the basisof meritagainst350Ioquota Sportspersons under 10Io quota arc to be considered subjectto eligibility 111 the above lwo categones m Ct Tbc curltroversyrelatirg19 thccligibiliiy01 the caildidates 0 who failed to secure therequisite inorit iii llle cxanlinatlun C3 I under 55Io quota to be agalll considerccl under 350Io 5 I merlt quota caine to be considercdhy a Division Bench ofthis Court Z lll Naresh Kumars case This Division Bench judgment was challeilged before the Honble SuprcmeCourt Iil SpecialLeavc to C e Appeal6CivillNoI0409 of2005 whichhasbcen dismisscdin limine 2C 5 On 10052005 CQ r A siinilar iSSUO CiItTlC Ilp 1Ir collSidoation beforclllis CoutI m42 Z 20 ln tlle case oi Harva Sillgll VStute of Haryana and others 6CWl3 1 No1194 of20059decided on 14052008 After admission ofthc writ petitionbythe HtonbleDivision I3cnch the inatter was consideredbya 1 learnedSingleJudgeof this Court for final disposal 29112006 Oll 1 The learned Single3udge ofthis Court was ofthe opinionthat certaill Ce provlslons of Rule 13 3 ofthe rulcswere notbrought to the notice of the Division Bench and on that basis a reference was made for consideration of the wril petitionand otller connected matters by a Division 13ench of this Court The uforesaid writ petitioncaine to be heard by a Division Bench oftllis Court The Honble Division Bench Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 75 r A n Il CWP N02914 of2010 ee1 vide its dated 14052008 affirined the ratio in Narcsh Kumars case supralwilh thefollowing obscrvations In view of the facts incntioned above these writ petitions are aIJowedin the same terlns as 111 Naresh Kumars case supra Thc 1 lr are directed to deputethe 0 100 the OrsllLower Scllool Course C I which will commeilce aftcl tIlCIlrOllOullcelnent 0 I of judgment lll this casc l lowever The 4 Z petitioner shall bc cIccmcdir1 OliiaIiOedIll 2 92 the Lowcr School tlourse Irom thc dale whcn lr I other constables havc qllaliOedwhose namcs 08 were approvcd10 undergo Lower School r er Course vide select list Annexure I l It is made W2 Z clear that if by gclling datc of Om passingthe Lower School Course the becane eligiblc for pronlotloll then he will get only deenieO 2eoo171 VArithotlt getlingatly itctuitl Onancial beneOts Itl VlCW f Ce principleofno work no pay as laid down by their Lordshipsof thc Honble SupremcCoutt in Union of India and another vs Tarsem Lal and others c20061 10 Supreme Coun Cases 145 99 Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 76 e lV 1 CWP No914 of2010 lle Hotlble theDivision Bench further consideredthe validityof theinstructionsdated13022007 andupheld its validitywith the observationsl So far as CWP N03609 of2007 is concerned ln that writ petitionsclect list prepared to 1 0 Lower School Coursc on the basis of instructions 0 dated 1 0 2007 a rcfcrred tn ahovellas been Cm As has oeen held earlier abovc said C5 instructlOllS Ore perfcctlyjustifiedand are ln I 0 consonance with the directions issued by this Z Courtin NareshKumars case 6supral Il t tr The claims of some of thc wril petitonersfor deputing to e Lower School Course have been rejected on the groundthaithcyhaving C45 failed in 55Io merit quotaare not cntitledto bc considered for bcingbrought CO Cr on List Bel in 35Io quotalhe claims ofsomc ofthe Wrlt have een Z 20 beenreiccted10T beio broughtin Li4 131 urllicr 3596quoUion theground Qm thatthey Iilere of less Ihan 35 years0f age 0S Ull Isl dayof jlInudry tf llls llon yearof selection Jn some cascs the cloims have been rejectedfor achievingthe tninimum 31 bench morks in tenns ofthe DGPs inslructions dated 13022007 In Naresh Kumars ctise lprao the Honblc Division ee Bench ruled the eligibility ofthe constables for their considcration both in 55Io and 35Io quota This judgmenthas attained flnalityrhe SLP hos also been dismissed by the Honble SupremeCourt The ratio of the said judgmenthas been reiterated 111 Hawa SingWscasnc Ioral as also in Constable Dharmbir Ys StteUmm01d othct 2009 19RSJ 3 10 wherein the followingobservations havc been lnade Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 77 49 d 45 1 1 CWP N02914 of2010 m12 13 So thereare three distinct with their own atid for eligibilityfrlr consideration Thcre lS no bar to corIsiderationr11a constable i tl anycategoryif he lilIOIJsthceligibilitycritcria Ce fhe is eligibJe Ill 1 1 all three he has a statutoryright to 0 consideration in all thrce catcgoricsThe Rulcs C do not categorizc or rcquiresome lnlnlmuin age Z C0 for eligibility undcrany ofthe Whatit I specifles is the uppcr age Iilnit for consideration Z under a category m C Dpitc these instructions ccrtain 1931100 78 Cj fe I 4 1a 4 Z hereinabove have againcroppedup The controversyrcgaidiIlgtlle 08 ofcandidates under 35 yearsofagcfor beingbrought 011List Be1 r0 4 for 35Io quotalgaincameup for ctlnsiderationbyanother Division Bench aa Z ofthis Court in Dhannbirs case 6supral and Balrai Singhand othersVs Ll State ofHaryana and others 2009 21RSJ 463 In Dharmbirs case 6supra9 a Division Bench ofthis Court held as undcrl 17 17 A conjointreadingof botll the subwrules would show that only the upper age Hmit a has been prescri bed under the rules and no lTilIlllllUm ige ilas been prcscribedeither undcr submrule2 6i9or suberule 2 iil which means that if a constable fulfills the requirementoi tlle upper ageand the other qualications prescribedundcr the respectitrecategory as per suberule 2 there is Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 78 Ve 11 CWPN029140f2010 13 no bal 10 his coilsideraliollunller eacll of Ihelll Meaninglherebya consllablcwho is eligibleill one under Rule 137 621 can also be consideredin the othercategoryundcr Rulc 13 2iil of the PunjabPolice Rulcs as there IS 110 1 bi8lrcation beoveen the rules as far as the CC 0 eligibility IS COnccrncd with regardto the Co illinimuin agc as noilc is Z C0 18 Tbe mlllllllUm ilge if by way 1f Z execullve lnStrUCtlOllS would go againstlhe r Z 5r interest of the Consuiblcs who are otherwise A C eligibleunder the slatutory Rules Rule 133 er I iil confers a rightwhich aonstable attaillSon O the basis of his scniorityin the scrvice As and C Ct whenhis turn cumcs bascd on the senloritya right 2 Z to considerationclcvolvcs on hiin This rightOll 0 thebasis of Jl4 vcninritycannclt bc dcllrived Oli LiIC basisIf cxeculivc itlstruclioirl Thls would hc ill 1 contraven tion lo tlle statutoryruies and thcrefore e not sustainalolc 22 Whatemergcsfrom thc above discussions is that a constablc who has completed5 yeEus of service on the Ist day of Jonumyof the year tll which the selection is made is under the ae of 35 yearsand is cl igible 123r considcration and selectloll101 includinghis Ilane in 1ist Bl ot Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 79 1 1 CWPN029140f2010 14e selectedconstablesfor admissionto lower School Courseunder thc 55Io quotaon the basisof mcrit as per Rule 137 2l l ofthc PunjabPolice Rulcs 1934 and having in the est 1B011and failcd or tvas unablc to get 1 enlistment due to lowcr 110er11Cllll also clitn C considerationand selectionunder the 35Io quota 0 43 on the basis of as per Rule C5 130 21 0il if hc IS cligibleundcr both the I categories Il Cr Z As noticed above the constablcswho have attained nllllllllum 5t 2 r3 31 bench marks under 35Io quotahavc hcen ignored Were Z deputed tn the courseon the groundthoi thcyarc nlor2 77cr1ior1c115haV1112 08 betterbench marks This issue is in foct covcrcd ulel Nalc911Kulllals CQ Cr case Osupraland came to be clarilled in 13 Singhs cass supral 7 Z whereinit has been held that whereeeveru junior has been deputedfor 3 Ll Lower School Course ignoring claiin clfloheseniotasInerely on the basis of thehigherbcnch marks the SClllor be deputed for the coursc and he will 17 be deemedto have passed the course from the datehis juniorhasqualiOed 4 In such situation senior will retain his seniority 4a There is another aspectof thc matter The DGPs instnictions dated 13 J2007 arc cnly llrospectlvcic nal1 1t 1010 to tIese illstiuctions no bcnch marks were undcr tlle latutory iules arld tlius 11 those constables who acquiredeligiIoiIityprior to issuance of these instructionshave been denied the deputation to the Lower School Course for non achieving the rninimutn bench nlarkse It is settled Iaw thal Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 80 4 CWPN029140f2010 15 in3tructioilscanllot oveITlJlcthc statutoryruleo 11i15l Ilr5t instructionscannot he lnto ScrVlCC to clcprive tlieconstablesoftheir rightfor for not havingachievedthetninimumbenchinarks as under lhese instructionsissucd later Thus such of thc constableswho became eligible priorto issuanceofthese instructions and 1m for not themlllllnum benchmarksare to be for 0 0 LowerSchoolCourse and on successfulcomplction of the course theyare Ca to be treated senior than their juniors who werc earlier deputcdto the I C0 LowerSchoolCourse ln otlherwords thcywill rctain their seniorltyf01 X beingbrougllt on List J3ml tllat theywere forthe 4r Z course Ialer thiin tlleir juniors or theydid not achieveniiniinum bench C marks I Similarlysuch ofthe constableswho arc ignorcdon acco unt c1 of 1ss than the orescribedbenchlnarks then their juniorsare CO alsoentitledto be deputed to the coursc and on colnpletion of lhe sanie will W2 Z retainheir scniority over theirjuniors tl Jn some of the writ petitionsthe constables have already 1110lolrer School Coursc bul theyhale tlcltt Ucllled iC 1 7 seniorityovcr tlleir juniorson the gtoilnd lhat thr luniolswere eitlwr having better bench marks or deputedfor thc course prioorin time than the C writ petitioners In view of the above obscrvations these writ petitionersshall be deetned to be senior to theirjuniorsdeputedearlier on account ofbeuer bench marks or on any other groundof cligibility To suIn up thcsc petitions are disposedofwith the following directionslm i9 Such ofthe who havc failed in 55 merit quota Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 81 j Io r 17 1 CWPNo914 of2010 1e areentitledto be consideredfor beingbrought on List B1 under 35Io quota on the of providedthcyhavc the requisite and are otherwiseeligible underthe ruJes io such ofthe constableswho were Iessthan 35 yearsofageas on theday oftheirconsideration but not more than 400years theywill be entitled to be me bydeputingthelnio LowcrSchool Coursc C 1 0 iiiJ the 13etitionersIillo eligibility1riortc thc TOCIPsinstuctitlns Ca3 dated13022007 wiIl be for the course witllout consideringthe C C0 of minimulnbench marks as under the governmeilt lnstructlOllS anclin their cases seniorityand other eligibilityCriterI a C Z under the rules will beenough for tlleir to the course C iv9 thepetitioners who becameeligible for after the issuanceof er I theinstructionsdated 13022007 andhae achievedl1le illiniillulil IJOli11 O marks be deputedto the course their lllnirlrs bavc bcttcr Oo bench lnarks m2 Z v9 lllterase of the constablcswill bc detcrinined on thc basis of Ll theirseniority in their districlsin the and not on the basis of passingof the Lowcr School Course in all such cascs who arc by the above directions Howevcr the interwseseniorityof constables will not be governedby the obove directions where senior was 4n0 of pendencyof any discplinary proceedings or who inored on account sttffered ony other disqualiflcaionfor dcloutation to Lower School Course vil drputaliontof lhe petitloners shall be made cIil the basls 431 lllclr seniority Ill theirrespectlile districtB and n8ainsl Olc available vacancics Let the claim ofthe be considercd in the light of the abovedirections and their whereever required be madc 111 Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 82 956 1 CWP N02914 of2010 el accordancewith the above directions A copy ofthis order bc placcdon the reO uf co3h C9onccled file 1ae 44 11082010 6PERMODK0HL19 BLS JUDGE 1 C I44 0 Notel Whether to be referredto thc YIES C C5 144 4 22 lO P C C I 08 CO er 7 Z 0 r Anita 2014.04.29 14: 08 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document