1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR A. P. P. W. NO. 39 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 602 OF 2010 Vijaya Ramdas Bhoyar Vs. State of Maharashtra Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Order Smt. Hiwase Adv for applicant. Smt Nandita Tripathi APP for non applicant/State. CORAM:V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.L. TAHALIYANI JJ. Dated: 24 th MARCH, 2011. . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State. The applicant had preferred Writ Petition No. 602 of 2010 wherein a grievance was raised that though she had approached the police station with her complaint, F. I. R. was not registered by the police authorities. At that time the learned APP stated on instructions that in fact the F. I. R. i. e. Cr. No. 62 of 2011 was registered by Police Station Sadar under various sections of Indian Penal Code, and as that was the only 2 grievance raised in the petition, Writ Petition No. 602 of 2010 came to be disposed of by order dated 10.03.2011. The petitioner had now preferred this application for Speaking to Minutes of the said order. The grievance of the petitioner is that after the F. I. R. was registered no investigation has been carried out and she has prayed for some reliefs in relation to this grievance. As far as the prayer of the petitioner in the present application is concerned, in our view the proper course would be to file a fresh petition raising a grievance that either no investigation is being carried out or investigation is not being properly carried out and seek reliefs connected thereto and present application for speaking to minutes would not serve the purpose. Hence this application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to prefer a Writ Petition raising the said grievance and seeking consequential relief. Application disposed of with aforesaid liberty. JUDGE JUDGE svk 3 4 5