IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 8045 of 2004 Between: 1) Md.Irshad, W/o.Dasari Naga Mahesh, D/o.Md.Vali, R/o.Gannavaram, Krishna District. 2) Dasari Naga Mahesh, S/o.Koteswara Rao, 2nd Street, S.E.R.Centre, Prasadampadu, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, Krishna Dist. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1) Superintendent of Police, Krishna Dist. at Machilipatnam. 2) Inspector of Police, Gannavaram, Krishna District. 3) Station House officer, Gannavaram Police Station, Gannavaram, Krishna Dist. 4) Md.Vali, S/o.Md.Kasim, Gannavaram, R/o.Gannavaram (V), Krishna District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in harassing me, my husband and his relatives at the behest of 4th respondent is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and for a consequential order directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein not to interefere with petitioners marital life and their personal liberty and also relatives of the 2nd petitioner and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CH.DHANAMJAYA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 8045 OF 2004 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed with following prayer : “ ……….. to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in harassing them and their relatives at the behest of the 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and for a consequential order directing the respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein not to interfere with petitioners’ marital life and their personal liberty and also relatives of the 2nd petitioner and pass such other order”. Despite notice, no counter affidavit is filed by any of the respondents. This Court while directing rule nisi, passed an order in W.P.M.P.No.10468 of 2004 on 27.04.2004 as under : “The petitioners are present before this court and they were also examined by the court. It is represented by both the petitioners that they have got married. But, however, the 4th respondent, who is the father of the 1st petitioner, is interfering through the respondent Nos.2 and 3. Therefore, the petitioners sought for a direction. Pending further orders, the respondents are directed not to interfere with the petitioners life and liberty.” In the circumstances, no further enquiry is necessary and accordingly the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent Nos.1 to 3 not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioners in any manner whatsoever without following due process of law. No costs. ________________ G.ROHINI, J 17th FEBRUARY, 2009 SUR