Crl.M.No.M 1516 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M 1516 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 8, 2010 Ram Chander and another .....Petitioners v. State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.P.M.Anand, Addl.A.G. Haryana. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No.419, dated 11.11.2009, registered under Sections 323, 406, 498-A, 120-B IPC, at Police Station Nuh. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 19.1.2010, passed the following order: “ Argues that husband has already been arrested and released on regular bail and the recovery has already been effected. Petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant's daughter. Notice of motion for 8.3.2010. However, in the meantime, if the petitioners are arrested, they shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to Crl.M.No.M 1516 of 2010 (O&M) -2- the satisfaction of Arresting Officer subject to compliance of conditions specified under Sections 438(2) Cr.P.C..” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that pursuant to the said order, the petitioners have already joined the investigation and that they are no more required for any investigation. It has been stated by learned State counsel as well that the petitioners have joined the investigation and that they are no more required for any custodial interrogation by the police. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, order dated 19.1.2010, granting interim bail to petitioners, namely, Ram Chander and Hardie is, hereby confirmed subject to the compliance of conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. 8.3.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge