IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9375 of 2008. Decided on: 23.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Jeet Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh. … Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Ms. Salochana Kaundal, Advocate vice Mr. O.P. Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Anshul Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): It is evident from the contents of reply filed by the respondent that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed as the pay and seniority has been fixed, as claimed by him. Consequently, the present petition is rendered in fructuous and the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 23, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.