IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1668 of 2010 Date of decision:- 6.10.2010 Raj Kumari ......petitioner vs. Dr. Narvir Singh, Director ......respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. A.K.Singh Goyat, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Anoop Sharma, AAG, Haryana HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has claimed reimbursement of medical expenses and retiral benefits. In the affidavit filed, it has been pointed out that retiral benefits as well as medical expenses have been reimbursed. In view of the said fact, no further orders are called for in the present contempt petition. Consequently, the same is disposed of as having been rendered infrucutous. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 6.10.2010 preeti