IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-34443 of 2008 Date of decision : 22.1.2009. ... Suman Rana ................ Petitioner vs. U.T. Chandigarh and another .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. H.P.S. Ishar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ashima Mor, Standing counsel for U.T., Chandigarh for respondent No.1. Sh. Sanjeev K. Patiyal, Advocate for respondent no.2. ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) Respondent no. 1 has not filed the reply. Respondent No.2 has filed the reply, in which it is mentioned that parties have effected a compromise. Affidavit of respondent No.2 has also been placed on the file. Respondent No.2- Rishi Kaushal is present in Court and is identified by his counsel Sh. Sanjeev K. Patiyal. The matter involved is personal in nature. So, in these circumstances and in view of the authority reported as Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, FIR No. 586 dated 22.11.2008 Crl.M. No. M-34443 of 2008 -2- registered under Sections 279/337 IPC at Police Station Sector 17, Chandigarh (Annexure P-1), stands quashed. Further proceedings, in pursuant to that FIR also stand quashed. ( K.C. Puri ) 22.1.2009. Judge chug