CWP No.10348 of 2010.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10348 of 2010 Date of decision : 27.05.2010 Sukhbir Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL **** Present: Mr. Mohd. Salim, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioners, who are registered medical practitioners, have approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to harass and humiliate them by visiting their shops without any cause or complaint and threatening them with registration of criminal cases against them. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners have made a representation dated 10.5.2010 (Annexure P-3) to the respondents ventilating the claim as set up in the writ petition but no action has been taken thereon so far. Learned counsel further states that at this stage, the petitioners would feel satisfied if a time-bound direction is issued to the respondents to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-3). 1 CWP No.10348 of 2010.doc After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners and perusing the file, the writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.3 to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-3) by passing a speaking order within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. May 27, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) atulsethi JUDGE 2