HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2347 of 2006 Petitioner Shyam Shridter Kisr®Aged • 47 years, Sfo of Shri S.Y. Kusre Posted as - Accountant, fit - S.S. Kalibadi Hr. Sec. Schoot, Kalibadi, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) R/o H. No. 10/11, Tatyapara, Ra^ur, Di^rict - Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondente 1. 2 3 The Steto of ChhatBsgarh Thrm^h- The Seeretary, School Educrtion Department, Mariralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur The Director, Public Instrudhans, Chhsrttisgarh Head Quarter at - Raipur. The Goveming Body of Kalibadi Shiksa Samiti, Throigh-its School Secretary, S.S. Kali Badi Hr. Sec. Sehool, Kalibadi, Ralpur (C.6.) WRIT PETITION U/A - 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF 1NDIA SB: Hon'ble Jusflce Shri Saflsh K. ^nihotri Present: Mr. R.K. Keshararani, Adwcate for the pefifioner. Ms. Dee(»liPandey, F'anel lawyer forttie respondents No. 1 and 2/State. ORDER (Passed on ttiis 16m day of April, 2007) The quesBon of law invoh^ed herein is whether the non-traching staff woridng in Govemment aided schoel are entitled to the benefit crf recommendations of the Fifth Pay Commisston under the provfelons of the Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Sltehan Sandha (Adhyapakwi Tatha Anya Karmchariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) Adhiniyara, 1978 (henceforth 'the Adhiniyam, 1978") and the mles made thereunder read with the Madtya Pradesh Revision of Pay Rutes, 1988 (hencerforth "the Pay Rules, 1988'). Learned counsel appearing for the petftioner submits ttiat th®torms and conditions of the teaching and non-teachtng staff are govemed by tte '^,- same provisions of law which were under consideratton by thts Court in the matter of Smt. A. Lall vs. State of Chhatfisgarh and other connected matters (W.P. No. 4108 of 2005), whereln by the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007, this Court hekl that the petiUoners who are woridng in fully Govemment aided private schools are entiUed to the revised pay-scales witti eflect from 1.1.1996 as prescribed under the Pay Rules, 1988. This Court further for the purpose of payment of arreare had granted certain direcUon. Admittedty and joinUy, tt is submitted by the parties that thls matter is squarety covered by the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed by ttiis Court in the case of Smt. A. Lalt vs. State of Chhattisgarh and other connected matters (Supra). As a result, for the reasons stated in the judgment and order datad 6.2.2007 passed in W.P. No. 4108 of 2005 (Smt. A. Lall vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ottier connected matters) (Supra), the writ petition is allowed in the same terms and conditions. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge