y^^ HIGH COVRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETITION (227) No. 2402 of2008 PETITIONER APPLICANT RESPONDENT8 NON-APPLICANT Zila Sahkari Keiidriya Baiik Maryadit Throiigh: The Chief Executive Officei^ Jagdalpyr, Dist. Bastar(C.G.) "v7ERSUS : 1) The Registrar, Co-operativc Societies, Clihattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 2) The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Raipur (C.G.) 3) Tfae Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Jagdalpm', Distt. Bastai' Director, 4) Lal Baksh Sheikh S/o Late Imam Sheikh, Ex- Lamps MaiiagCT, Keslikal at Preseiit R/o Near New Telephone Exchaiige- Kondgaon, Distt. Bastar(C.G.) WRn PETITION U/A 227 OF THE CONSTITLTION OF.INDIA SB: Hon'toie Shri Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: Shri Praful! Bharat Advocate forthe petitioner. SM Y.S.Thakur, Dqpiity Advocate General for the State/ respondent No, 1 to 3, ORALORDER (Passed on 28m day of April, 2008) 1, Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioiier-Bank Bubmits that the respondent No. 4 was termmated from service after proper enquiry on 19.04.2005. The respondent No. 3, thereafter quashed the termination order in an appeal flled by the respondent No. 4 oii 09.01.2007 (.'^miexure P/l). Being aggrieved, the petitioner-Bank preferred an appeal before the Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies., alongwith aii application for stay ofthe order dated 09.01.2007 passed bythe Deputy Registrar. The Joint Registrar dismissed the application for staying the order dated 09.01.2007, on 16.05.2007 (Aimex-ure P/2). The petitioner, thereafter preferred a revision which was also dismissed 011 25.02.2008 (Aimexu.TQ P/3) on the ground of non-maintamability. ThiiSy this petition. Shri Bharat leamed coimsel appearmg for the petitioner submits that after disinissal ofthe application for stay- the Joint Registrar, respoiident No. 2 is not deciding the appeal -which was filed iii the month of Febmary 2007. The petitioner seeks a directioti to the respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the appeal expeditlously. In normal course, fhis Court should not entertain such petition seekmg a direction to the quasi-judicial authority for disposal ofappeal. Howeven in the facts situation ofthecase, the petitioner is at liberty to make an application before the Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies^ to consider and decide the appeal expeditiously. In view ofthe foregoing observations, this petition stands disposed of Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Ajmi