IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4832 OF 2007 Susi Savio ...... ....Petitioner. V/s Savio Alexander & Anr ...... ....Respondents. Mr.Joseph T.S., Adv. For the petitioner. Mr.C.K.Thomas with Mr.Sasi Nair, Adv. For respondent No.1. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 13/7/07 PC: Respondent has filed a divorce petition against the present petitioner- wife and the same is pending in the Family Court since 1998. An application moved by the petitioner wife claiming interim maintenance was rejected on 20.7.2004 as the Family Court found that the petitioner was absent since last many days. The present petitioner before this Court moved an application on 1.9.06 for restoration of the application claiming interim maintenance. The same is pending before the trial Court. Despite pendency of the said application before Family Court the present writ petition has been filed calling in question to legality and validity of order dated 20.7.04. As the application for restoration has been filed by the petitioner-wife on 1.9.06 and the same is pending with the Family Court the present writ 1 petition is wholly misconceived. Even otherwise I do not propose to entertain this petition for the reason that I have already sought expeditious disposal of divorce petition by passing an order in Writ Petition No.2052/07. I have directed the Family Court to decide the Hindu Marriage petition as expeditiously as possible and preferably within three months from today. No interference with the interlocutory impugned order is called for. Writ petition is summarily dismissed. 2