IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU PETITIONER Awaan/V’L RESPONDENTS ,r 1. / k Satish Patel, aged about 38 years S/o Jasbhai Patel, President Nagar Panchayat, Churiya, Distt. Rajnandgaon VERSUS Virendra Bahadur Singh S/o Baleshwar Singh R/o Jaistambh Chowk, Rajnandgaon Rajiv Singh S/o Virendra Bahadur Singh R/o Jaistambh Chowk, Ward No. 22, Rajnandgaon Ajay Patel, S/o Jasbhai Patel, R/o Tahsil Thana Churiya, Distt. Rajnandgaon Jodhiram S/o Ramlal By Caste Teli, Mansingh S/o Ramlal By Caste Teli, Tularam S/o Ramlal By Caste Teli, R/o Village Haledosa, Tah and Thana churiya Distt. Rajnandgaon 7. /,4. / ”5. 6. / / 8. (r 9. /lO Siddique Qureshi, aged about 42 year, S/o Aziz Mohd. Radheshayam Sharma, aged about 35 years, S/o Omprakash Sharma, Siddiquk Memon aged about 52 years, S/o Azad Memon Dilip Thakur aged about 38 years, S/o Ghursingh Thakur R 7 to 10 Agriculturist, R/o Village Churiya, Distt. Rajnandgaon The Additional Commissioner, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE WRIT PETITION (227) No.1g95f/2011 11. CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CI-HIATTISGARH AT BILASPUR kE‘; w.P. (227) No. 1895/201 1 SBz- HON’BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, J PRESENT :- Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer, for the State. ORAL ORDER (10—5—2011) 1. This Court in W.P. (227) No. 7622 of 2010 directed the Additional Commissioner to dispose of both the appeals i.e. one tiled by the petitioner and another med by respondents within a period of two months. Though in fact, the petitioner preferred appeal before the Additional Commissioner whereas the respondents have preferred revision before the Commissioner. 2. The petitioner moved an application before Additional Commissioner for transfer of the case to the Court of Commissioner. Same was dismissed by the Additional Commissioner on the ground that the petitioner failed to show any provision authorizing him to transfer the case to the Court of Commissioner. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any illegality in the order passed by the Additional Commissioner. However, Shri Kotecha submits that respondents have already moved application for joint hearing of both the cases before the Commissioner; this petition may be disposed of permitting the petitioner to move application before the Additional Commissioner apprising him about above fact. PETITIONER Satish Patel Versus RESPONDENTS Virendra Bahadur Singh and others him about above fact. Sdl- N.K. Agrawal Judge }WW