1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.416 OF 2002 IN IN IN SUIT NO.3778 OF 2000 SUIT NO.3778 OF 2000 SUIT NO.3778 OF 2000 Daroomal J.Rupani .Plaintiff versus Chetankumar V.Sanghavi & ors . Defendants ... Mr.V.A.Thorat, Mr.Bharat Vaishnava for Plffs Mr.Sanjay Jain with Mr.Ramesh Jain for Defendant nos. 1 and 2. Mr.K.N.Gaikwad for Defendant no.3 BMC CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 1st April, 2005. DATED : 1st April, 2005. DATED : 1st April, 2005. P.C:- P.C:- P.C:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff and defenddant nos. 1 to 3. Learned counsel for the defendant nos. 1 and 2 states that the defendants has no intention of transferring 7/100 alleged share of the plaintiff in the suit property. The defendant nos. 1 and 2 undertake that they would not transfer 2 7/100 share of the plaintiff or any part thereof to any third person. However, this does not prevent the defendant nos. 1 and 2 and selling or transferring their 36/100 share in the suit property. Statement of the defendant nos. 1 and 2 is recorded and accepted. In view of this, no further orders are necessary in this motion. Motion is disposed of. Liberty to take out a fresh motion in respect of prayer clause (d) in view of the mistake in the map. D.G.KARNIK, J