SrtffiLEBEMCH .?. (20b) ,/" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.) W.P.No.. 1^2,5 of 2005 O^ PETITIONERS: / 1. 2. o^ Je L.3l^€ ^••<"^^ .•••"" c.W^'-'" ...*••"*" ^•^^ ^66"^--";; :^<:-w o RESPONDENTS: ^' Shashidhar Panda S/o Loknath Panda aged about 52 years Occupation Ad-hoc Upper Division Teacher, Govt. hl.S.School Mahapalli Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) . (Presently discontinued) R/o Village Belariya Post-Banora Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Harsh Kumar Satpathi S/o Vijay Shankar Satpathi, aged about 53 years, Occupation Ad-hoc Upper Division Teacher, Govt. H.S.School Mahapalli Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) (Presently discontinued) R/oViIlage-Navapara, Post-Bade haldi, Via-Pussour,Distt. Raigarh(C.G-) Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through :- Secretary Department of Education D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) The Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchnalaya Behind Bord of Secondary Education, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) Distt. Educatipn Officer, Education- District Raigarh (C.G.) State of M.P. Through:- Secretary Department of Education, Vallab Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Contd- «2.- XI-HC-22 3ff^T^T Rrli<=h3TT^T 5b^ich<RficT f»*iair: ^'^?^ l<-*- 3^ r<ll*ll<yt<4, ^Tf1y^l<g, fsjdiy^ [?T <-15|Ch HI<B<<<11 $h*1|ch—<^t..jr<.-2-?/^ »••••••«-^«0«»» »-»»^^»,•^ 200 53 W^T^cn'^T^cT 2S.4.300S Mr.K.N, Nande, counsel Mr. Akhil Agrawal, Pane| Heapd. The case of the petitic Department of erstwhile State Assistant Teachers in the Govel selected and accordingly^ they daily wages. However^ the sei vacancies which arise on ac< services were filled by the Stah making representations for co the post of teacher. Further c^ erst^vhile State of M.P. took a Shiksha Kai'mi but same is no1 Learned counsel for t] allowed to make a representa^ petition raising all their griev^ their representation, to wh'ich Having heard learned^ facts and circumstances of t[ representation along with cop^ today to respondent No.2 raii{ No.2 is directed to decide the| three months from the date oi] the grievances raised by the p^t With the direction afor4$ Consequently, I.A. Nos| Certified copy as per r^] chi<<f<rt41<rl ^ll^^lT^'fe^i'^R^K ^31'f^T3TT^T 5S. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge tor the petitioners. Lawyer for the State. liers is that in the year 1979 the Education ^f M.P. conducted a test for the appointment of ;(:nment Schools. In that test the petitioners were |were appointed as Upper Division Teachers on vices of the petitioners were discontinued and |ount of the discontinuation of the pedtioners? of M.P. Thereafter, the petitioners are regularly isidering the petitioners to the appointment on se of the petitioners is that in the year 1997 the decision to appoint ad-hoc teachers in place of being implemented by State of Chhattisgarh. petitioners subinits that petitioners may be lon to respondent No.2 along with copy of this aces and respondent No.2 be directed to decide 'ounsel for the respondents has no objection. ^ounsel for the parties and having regard to the case, the petitioners are allowed to make a of this petition within a period often days from ing all their grievances aiid in turn respondent representation of the petitioners within another 'eceipt of the representatiori after considering all :itioners in accordance with law. »aid,the petition stands disposed of, i964/05 & 2965/05 also stand disposed of.