IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 39 of 2011. Decided on: 5th January, 2011. Satya Devi. …Petitioner. Vs. State of H.P. & others. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved since her service as part time cook-mid day meal worker has been dispensed with by the respondents and she has been replaced by respondent No.5. The petitioner may represent her grievances before the 4th respondent, in which case the matter will be duly considered by the 4th respondent after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the 5th respondent within another four months. The petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 4th respondent and will also serve one copy each to the 5th respondent. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 5th January, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr) Judge.