IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 17584 of 2009 Between: M. Krishnaveni, W/o. Rajasekhar Reddy, R/o. Dimmagudi (V), Peddavaduguru (M), Anantaur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 3 The Tahsildar, Peddvaduguru, Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order ro direction more particualrly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd respondent innot passing any orders in stay petition filed along with appeal challenging the orders of suspension dt. 14- 8-09 passed in Rc.No. A/115/09, as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as F.P. Shop dealer at Dimmagudi Village, Peddavaduguru Mandal, Anantapur District, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.SITA RAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 17584 of 2009 ORDER: 1 The petitioner who is the fair price shop dealer of Dimmagudi village, Peddavaduguru Mandal, Ananthapur District approached this court and filed the present Writ Petition questioning the order of suspension passed by the third respondent on 14.08.2009 on the ground of certain irregularities. 2 According to the learned counsel for the petitioner the petitioner, immediately after the orders passed by the third respondent, approached the appellate authority i.e. the second respondent herein and filed an appeal along with an application seeking stay of operation of the orders passed by the third respondent. But so far no orders have yet been passed. 3 In the light of the said submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this court is of the view that this Writ Petition can be disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to dispose of the said appeal and also the stay application filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4 The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of at the stage of admission. No order as to costs. -------------------- 25.08.2009 kvsn