cf-\^o ^ IN THE HIGH GOURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G) W.P.fSINO. 2/^- / 2007 PETITIQNER ..-'^ N%(? .f^MY <>^M^ -<•?' RESPONDENTS 1. ^ 4 ^x o.' r' ^: 3. ^. Kali Ram Soyi Aged about 45 Years, S/o. ShriBaldeoSinghSoiti Assistant Teacher, Aadim 3ati Kalyan Vibhag Kanya Aashram Ghotia Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director Pubtic Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Durg District Durg (C.G.) The Collector Tribal Welfare Department Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CO NSTITU ION OF IN DIA r —^ •^o' (^-^- HISH COURT OF CHHATTISSARH AT BILASPUR W. P.fSl Ne. 317 of 2007 iiali ftam Sori Verais Respondents ; State of Chhatf'isgarh <& others ish K. i.J Pressnt: Mr. B.L. Dembra, counsel for the pet'tioner. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Sovernment Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDER yassed on this 22nd ttoy of January, 2007) 1. Learned counse-'s appearing for the petitioner as weit as learned Deputy <?overnnnent Advocate appearing for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petition is similar to •Hiat of in W. P.(S) No. 6883/2036 (Mehattar Ram Sahu Vs. State of th Chhatt-isgarh & o-ttiers), which was disposed of vide order dateel 12 December, 2006 (Annexur® P/2). They -fiirther submit that •tfie quest?on of law invofved is afso the same. £. In view of the above-s-tated submissions made by lecrned counse! for the parties, the writ petition is dispo^d of in terms of the order dated 12th becember, 2006 passed by -this Court in W. P. (5) No. 6883/2006 (Mehaftar Ram Sahu Vs. State of Cnhattisgarh <S others). No order as to costs. Sd/- Sadsh K. Agnihotri Judge