IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.123 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8609 OF 2003 Smt.Indrapatidevi @ Indra A.Pandey ...Petitioner Versus Maa Bharti Education Society & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.M.P.Vashi i/b M/s.M.P.Vashi & Associates for Petitioner. Mr.Dilip Bodake for Respondents 4 and 5. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JUNE 7, 2006. JUNE 7, 2006. JUNE 7, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Mr.Vashi for Petitioner fairly states that the principal grievance made in this Petition is that order of reinstatement has not been complied with. However, that direction has now been complied with by the Respondents. : 2 : 2. In the circumstances, nothing survives in this Petition. Same is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to pursue remedy with regard to payment of back wages, if any, as may be advised, which proceedings will be decided on its own merits. 3. Notices issued to the Respondents, if any, stand discharged. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.