IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2354 of 2009 ANOOP KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 19.2.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ application in respect of a certificate proceeding under the Bihar Public Demand Recovery Act is wholly unfounded, inasmuch as even if the objection filed by the petitioner under section 9 of the Act was dismissed due to default of the counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner definitely had a remedy by way of seeking review in terms of section 63 of the Act. That being so, this application is permitted to be withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority, namely, Certificate Officer, who had passed the order rejecting the objection under section 9 of the Act due to default of the counsel for the petitioner. It is expected that the Certificate Officer will pass an appropriate order and ensure that the objection filed by the petitioner under 2 section 9 of the Act is considered and disposed of on merits. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/