IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 22ND MAGHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 160 of 2008(S) ------------------------------ {IN W.P.(C).28172/2007 OF THIS COURT} .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER ---------------------------- G.JAYASHANKER, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.GOPINATHAN NAIR, SREE HARI, EAST KADUNGALLOOR U.C.COLLEGE P.O., ALUVA (NADASWARAM (UNDER SUSPENSION), ALUVA SREE KRISHNA SWAMY TEMPLE, ALUVA). BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.1: ----------------------------------------- SANTHOSH, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.(FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY IN-CHARGE, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, OFFICE OF THE TRAVANCORE BOARD, DEVASWOM BUILDING, NANDHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.D.SREEKUMAR, SC, TDB SRI.VENUGOPALA PANICKER,SC TDB THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. ------------------------- C.O.C.No.160 of 2008 ------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of February, 2008. JUDGMENT Mr.Subash Chand, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now an order has been passed by the Board rejecting the request of the petitioner. He submits that though the direction issued in the judgment was to the appellate authority to hear the petitioner, it was actually heard by the Assistant Secretary. This fact is refuted by Mr.D.Sreekumar, learned counsel for the Board. Be that as it may, in view of the fact that an order has been passed, it is for the petitioner to take appropriate steps, if he is aggrieved. Reserving the liberty to do so, the Contempt of Court Case is closed. Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/ //true copy// P.S. To Judge