1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Criminal Application No. 4308 of 2011 (Savitabai Dattatraya Uplenchwar v. The State) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. G.G. Kadam, Advocate for the applicant Mr. D.R. Kale, APP for the respondent / State PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Advocates of both sides. 2. The applicant apprehends arrest in CR No. 11 of 2011 of Police Station Sindhkhed, Taluka Mahur, District Nanded. 3. A perusal of the First Information Report, goes to indicate that all the offences, for which the present applicant is apprehending arrest, are bailable. Hence, the requirement of provisions of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for entertaining an anticipatory bail application are not fulfilled. Therefore, the present application is not maintainable. In view of above, application stands rejected. 22nd Nov. 11 ( R.Y. GANOO, J. ) SRM/ 2