IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8664 of 2010 SK.ILAHI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 15.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner can be alleged for marrying another girl but that was with the consent of the complainant 25 years ago. Now, differences are prevailing in between the children of both the wives regarding petitioner’s property, while complainant’s both alive daughters have been married. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 433 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Araria subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)