THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.9830 OF 2006 ORAL ORDER: The petitioner claims to be a small farmer having small extents of land in Sy.Nos.312/2 and 295/10 of Pulivendula, Kadapa district. It is stated that the said land is the only source of livelihood, wherein he has been raising groundnut crop. The petitioner states that a part of his land was already utilized for laying a road by the Panchayat Raj Department a year ago and again on 7.5.2006 the respondents had surveyed the land, and have been taking steps for forming a ring road. Hence, this writ petition contending that the action of the respondents in interfering with his possession without following due process of law as arbitrary and illegal. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the 1st respondent and having regard to the specific allegations made by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the land of the petitioner situated in Sy.Nos.312/2 and 295/10 of Pulivendula, without following due process of law. It is made clear that in case the land in question is required for purpose of laying a ring road, it is open to respondents to take appropriate steps either by initiating the proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act or by negotiations as provided under law. The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of. No costs. _____________ (G.ROHINI, J.) 5th June, 2006. Kgr THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.9830 OF 2006 5th June 2006. Between: T. Narasimhulu. .. Petitioner. And The Executive Engineer, R & B Department, Pulivedula, Kadapa District and another. .. Respondents.