IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23264 of 2010 PAPPU GIRI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 02.08.2010 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 386/34 of the I.P.C. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that from the F.I.R. itself, it is apparent that only demand was made but no payment has actually been made, hence no offence under Section 386 I.P.C. is made out and at best offence if any it is under Section 385 I.P.C. is made out and above all petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. However, regular bail applications of the petitioners may be considered in view of the fact that only demand was made and the same may be disposed of preferably on the same day. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)