FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4495 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4495 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4495 OF 2004 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.22627 OF 2004 FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.22627 OF 2004 FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.22627 OF 2004 Alog with Alog with Alog with FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.22627 OF 2004 FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.22627 OF 2004 FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.22627 OF 2004 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- None present for the applicant. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 28th JANUARY, 2009 DATED: 28th JANUARY, 2009 DATED: 28th JANUARY, 2009 P.C.: . None is present for the applicant/appellat. . By this application, the applicant/appellant is seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5.4.2004 passed by the City Civil Court. By the impugned judgment, the suit filed by the applicant/appellant has been dismissed. The suit was filed for injunction restraining the defendants/respondents from disturbing the plaintiff’s possession in the suit property. The City Civil Court held that the plaintiff had failed to prove that he is in possession of the suit property. In view thereof and with the passage of time, the applicant/appellant seems to have lost interest in these proceedings. Hence, the civil application and the appeal are dismissed for nonprosecution. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)