HABC 32/2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. This petition has been filed by the father for the production of her daughter Km. Bhupindra Pal Kaur. In paragraph 5 of the writ petition, it has been stated that the petitioner’s daughter appears to have married the respondent no. 3 and to seek protection they also filed some sort of writ petition before this Court. In paragraph 3 of the writ petition, it has been stated that the petitioner’s daughter is 21 years’ old. In view of the aforesaid that the daughter of the petitioner is an adult and there is nothing to indicate that the respondent no. 3 has enticed her coupled with the fact that the petitioner has made no attempt to lodge the FIR to find her missing daughter, this Court is not inclined to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus at this stage. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 18.11.2010 Prabodh