HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6137 of 2010 Date: February 02, 2011 Between: Chawan Raju … Petitioner And Subhangi … Respondent * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6137 of 2010 ORDER: This revision has been preferred by the husband, who was the petitioner in O.P. No.57 of 2007 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Medak at Sangareddy, against the orders passed in I.A. No.521 of 2010 taken out by the respondent-wife. The said interlocutory application has been moved by the respondent-wife under Order IX Rule 13 C.P.C. seeking for setting aside the ex parte decree passed by the Court on 30.11.2007. 2. The relationship between the petitioner and the respondent was not in dispute at all. The petitioner herein has filed the O.P. seeking for divorce from the respondent-wife. Based upon the endorsement of refusal found on the postal cover, an ex parte decree was passed dissolving the marriage between the parties by the Court on 30.11.2007. Considering the said application and in view of the averments contained in the affidavit filed in support thereof by the respondent-wife, the said I.A. was allowed and the ex parte decree was set-aside on 30.11.2007. The respondent- wife was directed to file her counter latest by 25.10.2010. 3. There is no illegality committed by the Court in entertaining I.A. No.521 of 2010 and allowing the same. Annulment of marriage between two parties carries with it greater civil consequences. Therefore, the discretion has been rightly used by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Medak at Sangareddy in allowing the said interlocutory application. 4. The petitioner is essentially aggrieved by the annulment of the decree passed in his favour because he contracted a marriage second time, as his marriage with the respondent herein has been legally annulled. Because of the subsequent development, he seeks to preserve the ex parte decree dated 30.11.2007. 5. The subsequent developments, if any, that took place after the ex parte decree can be brought to the notice of the Court when it undertakes trial of O.P. No.57 of 2007 so that the Court can grant appropriate relief. 6. With this, the civil revision petition is dismissed at the admission stage. No costs. _______________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J Date: February 02, 2011. BSB