IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19297 of 2009 SIKANDER PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 19.08.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioner has been named in the F.I.R. registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code for committing murder of his wife. The motive behind the occurrence is that petitioner had developed illicit relationship with his bhabhi which was being protested by the victim (wife). Learned counsel submits that he is being detained in custody on the strength of suspicion. Learned A.P.P. refers to different parts of the case diary to submit that the occurrence has been supported by several witnesses. It is further pointed out that Post-mortem report indicates that she was done to death by strangulation. Petitioner appears to be in custody since 26.3.2008. This Court finds from the impugned order that trial is likely to commence as the impugned order passed in S.T. No. 540 of 2008. In the facts and circumstances of the case this Court for the present is not inclined to admit him on bail. 2 However, considering the fact that he is in custody since 26.3.2008 and that there is no eye witness to the occurrence. This Court grants liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after seven months from the date of receipt/ communication of this order, if in the meanwhile all the prosecution witnesses are not examined at the trial. P.K. (K.K. Mandal, J.)