IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 2229 OF 2009 in WRIT PETITION NO. 1537/2000 (D) (Pandurang Bhikaji Sakore and others ..vs.. State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Shri U.S.Dastane, Advocate for the Applicant-ori.R. No.4 Shri D.B.Yengal, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 Shri C.S.Kaptan, Advocate for Original petitioner. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 09, 2009. 1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Uday Dastane for the applicant. 2. The application for extension has been filed after the time fixed for delivery of possession in order passed in the writ petition had expired. No efforts were made to get the procedure of delivery of possession stalled by punctually applying the orders of this Court. 3. Now, the grievance gets converted into a complaint for erroneous execution of the orders of this Court. 4. Applicant has lot of remedies to get this situation rectified for which applicant is free. This application is, therefore, misconceived and is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE Diwale