: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.200 OF 2009 Bank of Maharashtra ... Petitioner V/s. Sanjay Zaveri ... Respondent Mr.N.J. Devashrayee for Petitioner None for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: NOVEMBER 13, 2009 P.C.: 1. The Petitioner has approached this Court contending that there is a willful breach of the undertaking furnished by the respondent before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. By this undertaking the respondent had stated that he would pay the amount of Rs.31,37,000 on or before 29.4.2008. On this basis, the bank was directed not to confirm the sale till the next date of hearing. In my opinion, assuming the respondent has not complied with the undertaking given the petitioner has other remedies available in law including for modification of the order of 10.4.2008. 2. Reliance placed by the learned Advocate on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Pushpaben & Anr. v/s. Narandas V. Badiani & Anr., (1979) 2 SCC 394, in my opinion, is not relevant to the facts and circumstances of the present case. 3. Therefore, the Contempt Petition is dismissed.