1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Third day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14099 of 2011 R.MURUGAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.8 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NANGUNERI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT IN CR.NO. 310 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.R.A.RAMACHANDHRAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, in Crime NO.310 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 307 and 506(ii) IPC, the petitioner is before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of prosecution, the petitioner is accused NO.8 in the case. There was a temple festival in the village, in which, there was some quarrel between two groups of people. In the said quarrel, it is alleged that the first accused attacked the de-facto complainant with aruval. So far as this petitioner is concerned, he was the member of unlawful assembly and he also abused the de-facto complainant is the allegation. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would deny all the above allegations. According to him, due to rivalry in the village, the petitioner has been falsely implicated. 4.Having regard to the nature of the allegations made against the petitioner that they do not cause any injury and the fact that they only abused the de-facto complainant, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 to the petitioner, but with stringent conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 03/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANGUNERI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 3 THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, NANGUNERI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. S.R.A.RAMACHANDHRAN Advocate SR.No.37783 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14099 of 2011 Date :03/11/2011 TR :04.11.2011: 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/