IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS THURSDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2010 / 10TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 17313 of 2010(L) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- MOIDEENKUTTY,S/O.KUNNAMPADATH ASSAINAR, KUMARANELLUR AMSOM,CHEKKOD DESOM, POST AANAKARA, OTTAPALAM TALUK,PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,MALAPPURAM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PONNANI POLICE STATION, PONNANI. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANTHADAM POLICE STATION,PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. ISMAL PALAKKAL,S/O.ABOOBACKER, POST NADUVATTAM,VATTAMKULAM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. RAFI PALAKKAL,S/O.ABOOBACKER, POST NADUVATTAM,VATTAMKULAM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. VAKAYIL CHANDRAN, POST NADUVATTAM,VATTAMKULAM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.17313 OF 20101 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1.TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO.3522/2008 OF SRO CHANGARAMKULAM DATED 30.6.2008. EXT.P2.TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT ISSUED FROM THE VATTAMKULAM VILLAGE DATED 13.11.2009. EXT.P3.TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN THE NAME OF THE ASSIGNER OF THE PROPERTY BY VATTAMKULAM VILLAGE OFFICER DATED 26.6.2008. EXT.P4.TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 25.5.2010. EXT.P5.TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 28.5.2010. K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.17313 of 2010-L ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the Ist day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.Joseph, J. The prayers in the writ petition are as follows: “i. to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ,order or direction directing the respondents 2 and 3 to provide necessary and adequate protection to the life of the petitioner while entering into the property covered by Ext.P1 document. ii. to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ,order or direction directing the Ist respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5 representation filed by the petitioner.” 2. We have already passed an interim order. Though served, there is no appearance for the party respondents. In such circumstances we dispose of the writ petition by making the interim order absolute. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS