IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10762/2011-G Decided on:8.12.2011 _____________________________________________ Satya Parkash Sharma son of Sh. G.D. Sharma, resident of village Kolth, Tehsil Theog, District Shimla, H.P. …Petitioner. Versus Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Limited through its Managing Director, Ritz Annexe, Shimla District Shimla, H.P. …Respondent. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. _____________________________________________________ Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-1, order of transfer, and the subsequent relieving, as per Annexure P-2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner has already submitted a representation to the competent authority against the transfer wherein he has pointed out that he is to retire shortly and that his wife is working in Delhi. It is submitted that the matter is 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 under consideration of the competent authority. It is also submitted that the competent authority may take a decision within a period of two weeks from today. 2. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of making it clear that till the competent authority takes a decision the petitioner will be permitted to continue at New Delhi. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. Authenticated copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 8.12.2011 *awasthi*