1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 4730 OF 2008. The Zilla Parishad, Amravati. -: VERSUS :- Ramesh Pundlikrao Hirulkar. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : AUGUST 12, 2010. CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1747/2010. Heard Shri N.R. Saboo, learned Counsel for applicant/respondent and Shri J.B. Kasat, learned Counsel for petitioner. The issue stands concluded by the Division Bench judgment dated 22.03.2010 in Letters Patent Appeal No.477 of 2009. The said Letters Patent Appeal was in relation to an employee Dadarao Ramraoji Wadekar, placed similarly with the present respondent and his name appears in the order of appointment dated 03.11.1992 just above the name of petitioner. Shri Kasat, learned Counsel for petitioner has contended that the respondent is not a Parishad employee and is relying upon the provisions of Maharashtra Zilla 2 Parishad District Service Rules, 1968. According to him, this aspect has not been pointed out to the Hon’ble Division Bench and the Hon’ble Division Bench has therefore applied Rule 30 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 dealing with commencement of qualifying service. His contention is, the employment of respondent prior to 1982 was on contract basis and he was not holding any post in the Zilla Parishad. He points out that there was no such post on the establishment of Zilla Parishad. Shri Saboo, learned Counsel has stated that the order of Hon’ble Division Bench has been implemented in case of Shri Wadekar and he is receiving pension. He states that so far as this Court is concerned, the controversy stands concluded in view of the said Division Bench judgment. It is apparent that judgment of Hon'ble Division clinches the controversy before me. Civil Application is therefore, allowed and Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. The operation and effect of this order is stayed for a period of 6 weeks to enable the petitioners to take further steps in the matter. JUDGE Rgd.