IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13919 of 2009 Date of Decision: March 25, 2011 Darshan Singh & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Financial Commissioner, Revenue, Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. R.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Anil Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent No.1. Mr. H.S. Saini, Advocate, for respondent No.2. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. The petitioners, in this civil writ petition, pray for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing Order dated 25.9.2000 (Annexure P-3); Order dated 11.5.2001 (Annexure P-5); Order dated 12.3.2003 (Annexure P-6); and Order dated 28.4.2009 (Annexure P-11). 2. Detailed reference to the impugned orders need not be given because dispute has been settled amicably on the intervention of learned counsel for the parties which is appreciated by this Court. CWP No.13919 of 2009 [2] 3. Gist of the issue that survives is that the petitioners pray for a path to connect land comprised in Khasra No.402 in village Ramgarh Budha, Tehsil Derabassi, District Patiala [now District SAS Nagar (Mohali)]. Two karams wide passage has already been provided to the petitioners so as to connect their land falling in Khasra No.395 with Khasra No.402. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that if total land measuring 4 karams is provided for path, agricultural operations would become convenient and more effective. This is particularly so because Khasra No.402 is 9 feet deep and therefore would be required to be filled. 5. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has been very fair in saying that two karams of land, in addition, would be provided to make the path wider. Respondent No.2, as agreed by learned counsel for the petitioners, would be compensated be way of transfer of land to them by the petitioners from out of land falling in Khasra No.398/3 and 399/2 adjoining Khasra Nos.398/2 and 399/1 respectively, in reference to site plan, Annexure R-1. 6. The Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Derabassi, is directed to make amendments in the documents accordingly. 7. In view of the agreement between the parties, this petition is disposed of. (AJAI LAMBA) March 25, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?