IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1217 of 2008 AMIRKA YADAV SON OF LATE RAMVIRKSHA YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RATANPUR, P.S.- RAXAUL DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAMCHANDRA PRASAD YADAV 3. RAMADHAR PRASAD YADAV 4. RAMNATH PRASAD YADAV 5. RAMSHANKAR PRASAD YADAV SL. NO. 2 TO 5 ARE SONS OF RAN BAHADUR PRASAD. 6. GAGANDEO PRASAD YADAV 7. BIPINDEO PRASAD YADAV SL. NOS. 6 AND 7 ARE SONS OF RANJIT PRASAD YADAV. ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE RATANPUR, P.S.- RAXAUL, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN. For the petitioner : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar no. 2, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhayay, A.P.P. ----------- 2 06.07.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner, who is the informant of Raxaul P.S. case no. 40 of 2003, has filed the present revision application assailing the judgment and order dated 6.9.2008 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Raxaul, in Tr. No. 1598/2008. By the said judgment, the opposite parties were tried and acquitted of the charge punishable under Section 379 IPC. P.W. 3 is the informant of the case. Allegation in the F.I.R. is that the accused persons indulged in forcibly cutting bamboo trees standing on a particular piece of land. Apart from the contradictions reflected in the evidence of P.Ws. 3 and 4, the learned trial court has noticed from their evidence that there is a bona fide land dispute relating to the said piece of land. P.W. 3 is on record admitting that a title suit is pending between the parties. 2 In that view of the matter, consideration of the case by the learned trial court cannot be said to be perverse and/or perfunctory. There is no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )