IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22662 of 2009 GOLU SINGH @ RAJ KUAMR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIAHR ----------- 3. 24.8.2009 Heard Sri Nagendra Kr. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case has been registered under Section 302 etc IPC against unknown. The dead body was found in the luggage boggy of the train which was coming from New Delhi to Bhagalpur. The constable on duty found the dead body and accordingly the report was lodged. Paragraph 19 of the case diary contains the statement of the son of the deceased and he did not express any suspicion against any one for causing the death of his father. However, after one month of the incident the wife of the deceased and some others started insinuating the petitioner and others with motive to commit the murder and also put forth statements as if the deceased had telephonically informed them at least his wife that his life was in danger and that he was being followed by the petitioner and other gundas but again there is no reason to be pointed out to the court as to why the deceased - 2 - could not inform the police or the accompanying the railway guards for seeking protection. The learned A.P.P. also concedes to the above arguments. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in Bhagalpur Rail P.S.Case No.39 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )