1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 3266 of 2000 Akhil Maharashtra Prathamik Shikshak Sangh v. The State of Maharashtra & ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr K.V. Deshmukh, Adv for petitioner Mr T.R. Kankale, AGP for respdt no.1 Mr Gopal Mishra, Adv for respdts 2 & 3 Coram: B. P. Dharmadhikari and A. P. Bhangale, JJ Dated: 4th October 2011 1. After hearing learned counsel for the respective parties, we find that the controversy can be decided in the light of our earlier judgment dated 13th September 2011 delivered in Writ Petition No. 4119 of 2001. 2. Learned counsel for respondents no. 2 and 3 states that from amongst teachers whose names are mentioned as part of Annexure-D at pages 21-22A of writ petition, proposals for absorption of following persons are still not forwarded by respondent no. 3 Zilla Parishad, washim : (1) Pramod Rupchand Tale (2) Ku Lata Rajeram Kanadi (3) Murlidhar Rewaskar (4) Uttam Maroti Khadki 2 (5) Sanjay Sakharam Dhome (6) Pralhad Motiram Dhenge (7) Ku Vaishali Marotrao Ingole (8) Dnyandeo Mahadeo Morkhade, and (9) Ravindra Somnathappa Karanjkar 3. He further points out that candidate Prasad Shalikram Raje is not willing to be absorped back and Devidas Tulshiram Jadhav has been suspended and, therefore, there is no question of his absorption in Akola Zilla Parishad. He further states that all other teachers whose names appear in that list have been absorbed. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel, we find that controversy is covered by our judgment mentioned supra. Hence, with similar direction to Zilla Parishad, Washim to submit proposal to Zilla Parishad, Akola and its further processing, we partly allow this writ petition and disposed of the same accordingly. Judge Judge joshi