cp/^ IN THE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH_AJ^ILASPUR e. WRJTPETITION NO." ~""' OF 2006 PETITIONER .-•"n'^ Awadh Ram Tandan, S/o Shri V. D. Tandari .C*?-;J?^^" ..•"""'* ^e al)out 37 years, R/o Inderasen Nagar, ..•^^^/"'"" 27 Kholi' Mimgala»BOaspur (C.G.) -K^.s^:^ »\ .-s ^v^ >?'• ^' RESPONDENTS ^1 Q"w.^ ^\rf^ ^\^u rt. ^- VERSUS 1] State ofChhattisgarh, Through Secreatary Revenue Department cum Commissioner Land Record, Raipur (C.G.) 2] Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.)~ (^•" WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFJ2IE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / XI-HC-78 S^^TTqT^pr, ®Tnyi6,f°f<rtl<Hy W^\ sh^ich ..\A'.p.^..^^.O ^ 200 fi 3ii^i <^»fn(yt^stS.^T) Vl^fW! ^^ra 10-8-2006 ^ ^(TRRTrfsg'-w^r Stori. Asliek Dabey, c^unsel for the petltleiaer. Shrl x Satish Gupta°1* respondents, on advance c|3py. Heard. The case of the petit|ioner is that when he was worting as Assistant Supe the Collector, Bilaspur, trintendent Land Record under |ie was plaeed under suspension vlde order Annexure8P/2 d|ated 28th Harch 2006 and so far he has not been fterved wj.|th arteteflte'°pf-aharges along wl^h proviso to| documents. As per/sub~ru|le (5)(a) of rule 9 of tte Chhattisgarh Civil Sei-vice|s (Classificatlon, Control & employee is not served wi documents within 45 days and the Government ordersl In tftls case, more the Collector that even a|; and documents, therefore. ':hl;<tcl41'l flW«\f{ ^S <Rl't<K ^3lR)*T3TI^T Deputy G.A. for the Etate/. Appeal) Rules, 1966 (for s^iort 'the Rules, 1966) if any |th the charge sheet and ewns [Erom the date of suspensj.on are also not obtained for extenslon of the suspensl|on perlod, then theK employee is entitled for reinstatemen|t. Second proviso further envisages that the suspen(Bipn shall stand revoked on expiry of 90 days from th|e date of order of suspension. |than 90 days have already eiapsed* on 26-5-2006«. -TFie petitljoner made a representation to ajfter the XB explry of mandatory period of 45 days he has jnot been served with charge sheet he be reinstated. P.T.O. [ \ XI-HC-78 3^ "'ll'illd'il, (Si-tn^'16, Rfrtwy *TTR^I SbHTth ^nr 200 w^TTg^? (yit^q^) dW3IT%T9WI°h c: ^^\ tTWflf5tT3TI^T -2- Therefore, in view of th^ (1) and (2) of sub-rule ($ js entitled for relnstatem^nt In tbe circiimstanc^! pass orders in acccrdanc^ However, the respondents sub-rule(5)(b) of Rule 9 charge sheet and other dcf' expedient so to do. The writ petition j|s C.C. as per Rules •^l^Ic-I^Tl^ ^TRcTt' ^' fe^t •cf^T'RK ^sTi^irsn^r non-complj.ance of the prAvdiso )(a) of Rule9, the petitloner 4nt. |s, respondents are directed to with proviso to sub-rule (5)(a), ^hall be at liberty to Invoke |o£ tte Rules, 1966 after serving lcuments, if it x 1s considered [s disposed of accordingly. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.