$ing1§rg %mii C39 [N I‘IIE HOWLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH At BILASPUR élf/Vow/ Writ Petition (s) No.45 a ‘37 2006 Dwas Ram Sahu /' S/o Late Shri. H.L.Sahu Aged about 56 Years, Employed as Data Assistant, O/o (E&M) R & R , Water Resources Department, Raipur Residing at : Bada Ashok Nagar, Bazar Para, Behind Durg Mandi, P.O. Pahari Chowk, Gudiyari, RAIPUR (CG). PETITIONER Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh é ' Through : The Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, RAIPUR — 49 1 002 (CG) 2. , The Engineer-in-Chief v Water Resources Department; Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lines, RAIPUR — 492001 (CG) RESPONDENTS : p 3. The Chief Engineer, / Mahanadi Proj ect, Raipur Water Resources Department, . S.R.P.Chowk, Shankar Nagar Road, RAIPUR — 492001 (CG) 4. The Superintending Engineer, / Electrical and Mechanical Circle, Water Resources Department, Civil Lines, RAIPUR — 49200.1 (CG 5. TheExecutive Engineer, x Heavy Equipment (E&M) Division, Water Resources Deptt. OCM-Chowk Irrigation Department, RAIPUR (CG) ‘ ) ) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND K THE DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY, MANDAMUS ETC. ® @ XI-HC-78 Hw,m,%mgx wmwk?9§~©9 1H zooé 35 WW<W> mamm WWW WW§WW wwwm éamm 29-8-2005 Mr. B.P. Rao, counse! forthe aetitioner. Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the Stateirespondents. on advance copy. Heard both the counseL The case of the petitioner is hat he was appointed as Data Assistant in the respondent Department on 7 6-1980 in the pay scale of Rs.120—1 70/- which was revised in the 5‘" Pay C mmission to Rs.3,500-5,200i—, but since 1980 the petitioner has not been granted the benent of Assured Career Progression scheme, whereas he i entitied for first promotion on compietion of 12 years and second on com ietion of 24 years. The petitioner has completed 25 years of service and he has not been granted any promotion as per the ACP scheme. The petiti ner made a representation to respondent No.3 for granting the benefit of AC scheme. but same has not been granted to him. Having heard iearned coun ei forAthe parties, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the cas and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the petitioner is iiowed to make a detailed representation raising ail his grievances annexi g a copy of the writ petition and its annexures to respondent No.2 wit in ten days from today and respondent No.2 is directed to decide the rep esentation within three months from the date of its receipt after considering the points raised by the petitioner, in a‘n objective manner, in acoordance wit law. With the direction aforesaid,t e petition stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for certifie copy of this order. Sd/— L.C. Bhadoo Judge 1". LU. t