1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 255 OF 2010 Tata Capital Limited. ... Petitioners. V/s. Kailashraj B. Rawal. ... Respondent. Mr. Nikhil Mehta i/b. KMC Legal Venture for the Petitioners. None for the Respondent. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 7th APRIL 2010. P.C. :- Affidavit of service is filed. Respondent is served. This Petition can be disposed off finally today. The Petitioners claim that they had advanced loan to the Respondent. The Petitioners claim that the Respondent has not repaid said amount. In order to protect the interest of the Petitioners by this Petition, diverse reliefs are sought including relief of appointment of a Court Receiver. After having considered the entire record, I am inclined to observe that as of today, the only relief which can be granted to the Petitioner is that the Respondent can be directed to furnish list of movable and immovable properties owned by the Respondent so that the Petitioners would make use of that information at an 2 appropriate stage. Upon receipt of the information mentioned in the said statement, the Petitioners are free to file appropriate proceedings so as to protect their interest even after disposal of this Petition. 2. Hence, following order is passed to dispose off the Petition :- “The Respondent is directed to file a statement in the form of an affidavit disclosing therein movable and immovable properties owned by him. This be done by him within a period of three weeks from today by filing an affidavit before the learned Arbitrator. Upon receipt of the information disclosed in the said statement/affidavit, Petitioners are free to move for appropriate reliefs to protect their interest. Ad-interim order if any stands vacated.” (R.Y. GANOO, J.)