IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20986 of 2009 MANSORR ALAM @ KALU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.08.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that in the Dharamshala Road, Kishanganj, petitioner and others have looted, ornaments, cash, mobile, share certificate etc. of the informant on pistol point. Some of the accused persons were arrested on statement recoded by the informant. Some of the articles were also recovered from the accused persons. A Nokia mobile stolen in this case was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel submitted that the Nokia mobile has not been put on T.I. Parade. I accordingly, direct that the Court where the matter is pending i.e. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj to ensure that a Test Identification Parade is held with respect to the stolen articles within a period of three 2 months by issuing notice to the Investigating Officer of Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 69 of 2007 to take action and submit his report to the Court i.e. C.J.M. Kishanganj. The petitioner would be at liberty to move the Court for bail after T.I. Parade. Bibhash (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)