IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35414 of 2010 SURAJ KUMAR SON OF BENI PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KEWALA TAL, POLICE STATION FATUHA, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 25.2.2011. Heard Shri Sunil Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, who is in custody in Fatuha P.S. Case No.403 of 2009 for the offence under Sections 395/397 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. The case was instituted against 10- 12 unknown accused persons. During investigation, the name of the petitioner has surfaced on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that from the F.I.R., it is evident that occurrence was witnessed by number of persons and they had claimed to identify the accused persons, but petitioner was never put on T.I. Parade. Save and except confessional statement, there is nothing on record to implicate the petitioner. 2 Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State, of course, has not disputed the fact that he was not put on T.I.Parade and only on confession of the accused, he was made accused, but it was submitted by her that petitioner is having criminal antecedent and as such his prayer for bail may be rejected. In view of the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Patna City at Patna in Fatuha P.S.Case no.403 of 2009. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)