IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3027 OF 2005. PETITION NO. 3027 OF 2005. PETITION NO. 3027 OF 2005. Mr.Sachin Laxman Chandorkar. ... Petitioner. V/s. The Thane Municipal Corporation and others. ... Respondents. S.M.Oak for the petitioner. R.S.Apte for the respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 29th November 2005. 29th November 2005. 29th November 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The order under challenge is dated 11t January, 2005 passed by the Industrial Court in Complaint (ULP) No.717 of 2000 whereby interim application canvassing individual grievance of the petitioner came to be rejected. 3. I was taken through the contents of the petition as also the contents of the application filed by the petitioner in the complaint. Cause of action to the petitioner is subsequent to filing of complaint. The complaint canvasses common grievances of all the complainants who are 40 in numbers. So far as petitioner is concerned, the grievance sought to be canvassed is his individual grievance and not common to all. 4. In the circumstances, no fault can be found with the impugned order. However, it would be open to the petitioner to file individual complaint, if advised. This order shall not come in his way, if he decides to file individual complaint. 5. Accordingly, petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, J.) J.) J.)