IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1853 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.1853 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.1853 OF 2004 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:------------------------------------ Mr.R.K.Mendadkar for the petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane AGP for the respondents. CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. D.B.BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 8TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 DATED: 8TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 DATED: 8TH SEPTEMBER, 2005. P.C.: . By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Caste Scrutiny Committee as incorrect and illegal. We have perused the impugned order. The order considers as many as 26 documents filed by the petitioner. The order notes in paragraph 7 thereof the conduct of petitioner in not remaining present before the committee to verify and prove his claim. Apart from this fact each document filed by the petitioner before the committee is scrutinised and is dealt with appropriate reasons. In such circumstances we see no reason to interfere with the order passed by the Caste Scrutiny committee. 2. Apprehension is disclosed by the petitioner that pursuant to invalidation of the certificate his services are likely to be effected. Reliance is, therefore, placed on Government Resolution dated 15th June, 1995. That resolution followed by subsequent resolutions, protect the services of the persons appointed prior to that date. That being the factual position it shall be open for the petitioner to make a representation in the light of those resolutions. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. ...