IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.120 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5327 OF 2006 Pandharinath Babulal Wagh ... Appellant Versus The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Malegaon, Camp, Malegaon, Distr. Nashik and others. ... Respondents Mr. D.B. Patil for the appellant. CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, C. J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 3RD MARCH, 2010 P.C. The grievance of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant is that though the appellant was working as driver since 1989, he has been given benefit so far as permanency etc. is concerned, from 18th August, 2003. 2. It appears that the Labour Court has given the benefit to the appellant from the date he approached the court. 3. Looking to the facts of the case, the learned advocate appearing for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal so as to approach respondent No.3 by way of a representation. If such a representation is made by the appellant, the same shall be considered by respondent No.3 preferably within three months from the date of receipt of the representation. 4. Appeal stands disposed of. No order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.