-: 1 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 982 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3911 OF 2008 Smt. Irene M. Mukherjee. ..Applicant. Versus Smt. Kalpana Pachauri & Ors. ..Respondents. Ms. L. Bulchandani for the applicant. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : April 16, 2010. P. C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the respondents. This civil application is filed for restoration of the above writ petition. Writ petition was dismissed for failure of the petitioners to serve the respondents within the stipulated time. In paragraph no. 6 of the civil application, averment is made that the respondents were served prior to the admission of the writ petition. It appears that this fact was not brought to the notice of the Court when the Court passed order directing the petitioner to serve the respondents. In the present civil application, the Respondents are duly served and affidavit to that effect is also filed. Inspite of this position, none appears on their behalf. In that view of the matter, the averments made in the civil application are deemed to have been accepted by them. Civil -: 2 :- application is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b). 2. By way of abundant precaution, the petitioner is directed to serve the respondents once again in the main writ petition. The petitioner shall do this exercise by serving advocate’s notice on respondents, either personally or through RPAD/Courier/Fax/E-mail and file affidavit of service before the next date of hearing of the writ petition. Writ petition to appear on board on 10th June 2010. (R.V. MORE, J.)