IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2008 / 30TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 21796 of 2008(T) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------ 1. MOHAN RAJ, AGED 28, S/O.RAMRAJ, THENAMPATHIKALAM, OZHALAPATHI.P.O, PALAKKAD. 2. K. NATARAJ, AGED 44, S/O.KRISHNASWAMY KOUNDER, OZHALAPATHI.P.O, PALAKKAD. 3. C.K. MANI, AGED 50, S/O. KARUPPAN, CHUNNAMBU KALTHODE, VELANTHAVALAM. BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY, CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, JOINT REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, PALAKKAD. 4. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD. 5. VELANTHAVALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, LIMITED NO. P 504, VELANTHAVALAM, REP. BY ITS MANAGING COMMITTEE. 6. THE SECRETARY, VELANTHAVALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, LIMITED NO. P 504, VELANTHAVALAM. 7. SHIR SWAMIYAPPAN, VELANTHAVALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, LIMITED NO. P 504, VELANTHAVALAM. BY SR..G.P.SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN FOR R1 TO R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN,J. --------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)NO.21796 OF 2008-T ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of July, 2008. JUDGMENT Having regard to the nature of the directions being issued hereunder, notice to respondents 5 to 7 dispensed with preserving their right to move for review of the judgment, if aggrieved. Learned Senior Government Pleader appears for respondents 1 to 4. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Senior Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 4 quite in extenso on the basis of Ext.P1. Without expressing anything on merit, this writ petition is disposed of directing that the third respondent will consider Ext.P2 and take a decision as may be found necessary. It is further directed that any proceeding against respondents 5 to 7 shall not be finally disposed of without giving them an opportunity of being heard. If the petitioners request for an opportunity, they will also be heard. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. cl . 2