IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 26TH JULY 2011 / 4TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20306 of 2011(K) ------------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- JITHIN.G.DAS, S/O.GOPIDAS.E, LEKSHMI MANDIRAM, MATHIL BHAGOM, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADVS. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND SMT. AJITHA V. SMT.K.RAJANI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PIN-686 560. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, OFFICE OF THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM, PIN-686 560. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, OFFICE OF THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, KOTTAYAM, PIN-686 560. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 20306 of 2011(K) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE HALL TICKET ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY RESPONDENT NO. 3 WITH REGISTER NO. 58032. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE LETTER OF INTENT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY ACHIEVERS BUSINESS CORPORATE. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE LETTER OF INTENT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY INNOVIS TELECOM SERVICES PVT. LTD. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION. EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE CHALLAN DATED 22/7/2011. EXT.P6 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22/7/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE RESPONDENT NO. 2. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.20306 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of July, 2011. J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 8th Semester examination was declared, he had failed in one paper. He applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within six weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 3rd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC ab JUDGE //True Copy//