IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5406 of 2008 1. Sri Bankim Chandra Gupta, Son of Late Maheshwar Prasad, resident of Village- Mahesh Khunt, P.S. Mahesh Khunt, District- Khagaria. 2. Sri Sanjai Kumar Gupta, Son of Sri Bankim Chandra Gupta, resident of Village- Mahesh Khunt, P.S.Mahesh Khunt, District- Khagaria, presently residing at House No. 21/1018, Indira Nagar, P.S. Gajipur, Lucknow(U.P.)................................Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Smt. Kiran Gupta, W/O Shree Sanjai Kumar Gupta, D/O Shree Brahamdeo Sahu, resident of Ist Floor, Devasthali Apartment, Rajendra Path, North Sri Krishnapur, (Behind H.P. Gas Godown), Boring Road, P.S. S.K.Puri, District-Patna........Opposite Parties. ----------- 3. 21.04.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing on behalf of the State and opposite party no.2. The present application has been filed for quashing the order dated 24.09.2007 whereby the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna, has taken cognizance in complaint case no. 464(C )2007 under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is very fairly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the trial is going on. Hence in the changed scenario learned counsel for the petitioners has prayed for early disposal of trial since the petitioner no.1 is aged and resides in Khagaria whereas petitioner no.2 is posted at Lucknow and deliberately the opposite party 2 no.2 is not appearing in the divorce case and also delaying the disposal of present criminal case. In view of the aforesaid changed situation, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. However, the learned trial court will try to complete the trial expeditiously. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)