CWP No.13299 of 2007 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CASE NO.: CWP No.13299 of 2007 DATE OF DECISION: December 5, 2008 GURDISH KAUR ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA. PRESENT: MR. ASHISH GUPTA, ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER. MR. B.S. CHAHAL, DAG, PUNJAB. MR. SUKHJINDER SINGH, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2. MR. KARAMBIR SINGH, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.6. ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J.(ORAL) The challenge in the writ petition is to the appointment of respondent No.6 as Aanganwadi worker of village Jhunda, Tehsil Malerkotla, District Sangrur. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was more meritorious than respondent No.6 and further that as she belongs to village Jhunda, therefore, she should have been appointed as Aanganwadi worker. The residence of the petitioner has been denied by the respondents wherein they have stated that the petitioner is a resident of village Amargarh, where her husband is also residing and her children are studying in Government School of village Amargarh. Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on Annexures P-7 to P-14 to contend that the petitioner in fact is a resident of village Jhunda. CWP No.13299 of 2007 -2- As there are disputed questions of fact, therefore, we are not inclined to interfere in this writ petition. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner prays that he be allowed to withdraw the writ petition to avail of any other remedy which may be available to him. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for granted. (ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA) JUDGE December 5, 2008 (RAJAN GUPTA) Gulati JUDGE