IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Regular First Appeal No.338 of 2001. Date of decision: 18.11.2008. State of H.P. …Appellant Versus Palas Ram & Others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Dev Darshan Sud,J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Appellant: Ms.Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General. For Respondents 1 to 5: Mr.Rakesh Dhaulta, Advocate. and 7. Dev Darshan Sud,J. When this appeal was taken up for hearing, it was un-disputed before me that the Notification which is the subject matter of this appeal was also adjudicated in RFA No.335 of 2001, titled: State of H.P. vs. Mathu & Others and RFA No.19 of 2002, titled: State of Himachal Pradesh & Another vs. Tulsi Ram & Others. Both these appeals were preferred by the State against the judgment of the learned Reference Court. The same grounds, as urged herein, were taken in those two appeals which have since been dismissed. This Court did not accept the contention of the State as urged therein. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? In the facts and circumstances of the case, this appeal is also dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. November 18, 2008. (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.