^^'•'^'^••J'-J'^ IN IHE HI(3H COORT. Og^ .JtJ.DXIA'EUBE. AT BIIASPUE; (e.G.) MKKE PES'tSJ.SW N0. Q-K 2001 w M BB.g'SBEN ^t^ ^jtoEita.,Kls^tta ^^sts1;anib.'teacliart,,|iged! '.,:;. „ a.1'. atoput ,4.2 /yeais »/Q aebes1d.an ';KJta$Qfeta» .fficibal ' lfare Glrls Priinary Sehool BafhalgaentJasheur,,,,.... •^^ ?•°-, p;e1'"' :l1? ^ ;':^c ^ reiT,IONER A N B w 1. 2? 3? 2he Sta,'t3e.,_0.f ,flbiaatj;i.sgasto« ^.Eough ae •^se^tary'lSeBartsWi-b of •Erlbal ffelfare, .B.K.Buaj.Qihgsfialpur. • ^eJeeiU.eetos -tssSbaJ. Welfare)'.' .aaigaFh .Bis'ta-lo-b. Baigarh - (gaiha-btisgarh ),. .afee ^)rinnisstoBer f .Aadivasi Akas, Opvfe.af Ctiha'fctisgaria»I Baipur.' iot tl 42 5; •Ehe Assa.s'fcan't Ounmissiener, Aadlvasi Vikas, .3he' S-tate adiBtoi.sfcira.tivs .Tribunal. mipur .Benc&y Baipuj?.. «aSE.PETIT3aN'«BNBeK KWSIEtStBS 226/227 GfE 'EHE GQHSS2TUTIGN Q£::m@IA ^^f''' ,r. aIi^t^!T f^wsnf® ^;^N?'?if^T 2,5,2001 aii^r ^giwai?^ StirJt Prasbsat Risbra the petitioiar. i»ht<to Shrl. Mishra l<eari»d I»fcitl.oBer s^im.tts tbafe uajas'ttfl.ed An aialEiag fcb4 orQer Inpi^ned that t;l» o( tl»setao&l to hin* t.Sae osdear aa was dat;ed 24.7 *189» and I|!BS secre'tary, S-tate'aE Edaeatian Sepansneat. H^ fcha said Bepaifcy Setwe'tear^' dl.rections SjEwea t>y tit» the tae.par'&aent. teufe ttie iti held that fehe peCS.tel-oaer letAer <aatel3 24.?.l99? a3 1ayV.tw Cjatef Seea:etary, tbe PriKiipaX of tfae tfa®iefcter of ttoe seerefe^acy thafc lall-fcer aated 24.'?.' Pr.l.acipal Seceetary. He beeaase of fetoe ebservafci.tfrBS the petJt,t*.oner fass besa to faee serious .9$ ewSBeque^ases ^i^-^-l ^W^Il^f f^^l <f^<<iK ^srf^man^f lear*wd cgiaasei far DE.H.K.Shukla,—learn4dIiy.A'G*t®rtbs (toaasel for tbe the TEa»anal was abservations in tbe ^e'tt'tsio1*®^®fPrA.acipal. |sone osSiss. Accoaai.ngi fslianoe was plaeed .fssued by tte iDeptrty EBa^sh* Scfaoel («EtheE satenJS.fes that •'teaE^^taa^^iSBfiGrfed €o eertain ^Eiae2pa3,'Seea'efeary <st lj>3cfl»anal. te&s wrongly |was Eelytag upe'a the .ieged t®be issaed IBs subinlts tfeat i.6 facfe sch<i>ol after misEeadiag qtteted ia fais order was isstteet by t,he furthee eubnits ttaat nadB by the Tribunal ^vassaSeS aad he As litely Bc. SbukXa. Xeaaaed GRPRJ—FS/311—1/2001—50,060. n-155 ~C~T. THECOURT. -of 199 Order or Ppoeeecfing with signature ofPresiding Officer Date of order or Proceedi&g. Signature of Parties or Pleaxter& wfeffire neeessary i-S^^ Deyifcy Adwxate eeimE'al* r^Ee»xi,i^.ltst: paras 13, 14 and IS o< tl ®«aeElapagaed; sdbmlts (shat ^he TrlUbt.iBal was absolafcal.y lt»sU.fi,»Aia haX^liag that the ps'bitloiier had feaged ttoe alleged lett.er. iaast fit^ ~t»wu: <^pinj.oa» 'tebs a reyAew geS^fctoa betore •fehe to y*eas ttafeAee, of -ttw Igaeimd KCHaaer o£ fehet Tr.tteaaal. •fetaat l.etrtsE Annea^e-B/5 was iasge^ by the1 BepB'fcy^s^eEj&feary ^sBd.'J.t. was; fefetrl.ngi fco- eeEtai.a A^txw2tltOBS ^oS •t&e Sri.nol.pal seea»teAey'aRd''t,he- Srliaeigai oS:' tbft ,Sebool.» aWftjbE<*»Aly'-.Rtta<«ai t*8':fete":tstteex:' cxg ^ Begufc? SecEetaEy, <ecoEded Aa bJto fefteec fchat be was AS»)I»I^orders i.n ace<a-dane« til^Ja tfoe direetiQBs <rf tfae Steief/SeeKe^aKy. Ttae petittot«r As feee te> .s»pc.oa<sh fcfas'miiaaaX •with a revlew pet.lttoa. ~ , Tto pefcifcioa Jls diapesed of. c.C. to ^ar'ti.es on payai®Bfc. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- R.S. Garg Judge i '-'y". r yi