Civil Revision No.1925 of 2011 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: March 18 , 2011. Civil Revision No.1925 of 2011 (O&M) Buta Singh ..Petitioner Versus Amarjit Singh and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.G.S. Nagra, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- MOHINDER PAL, J. Plaintiff-petitioner is aggrieved against the order dated 15.2.2011 passed by the trial Court whereby, in a suit filed by the plaintiff-petitioner against the defendants-respondents for permanent injunction in respect of the property in dispute, evidence of the plaintiff has been closed by an order of the Court. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the interests of justice, this petition is allowed, the impugned order passed by the trial Court is set aside and a direction is issued to the trial Court to afford one effective opportunity to the Civil Revision No.1925 of 2011 (O&M) plaintiff-petitioner to produce his entire evidence. However, it will be subject to the plaintiff paying Rs.5,000/- as costs before the trial Court, which shall be got deposited with the State Legal Services Authority, Punjab by the trial Court. Dated: March 18,2011. (MOHINDER PAL) ak JUDGE