BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Second day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14862 of 2011 1 RAMAPANDI 2 KUMARAN 3 MUNIYASAMY 4 MURUGAN 5 SENTHOORPANDI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO. 1 to 5 R.PADMANATHAN ... INTERVENER Vs STATE REP. BY THE THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADALADI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT, CRIME NO.108/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. K.KUMARAVEL Advocate For Intervener : M/S. ARJUNAN, Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are the accused and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 307 I.P.C. and section 3(i) of TNPPDL Act in Crime No.108 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police. 2. Heard Mr.K.Kumaravel, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3. According to the case of prosecution, the petitioners are said to have caused damages to the de-facto complainant's car upon a wordy quarrel. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent person and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would oppose the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. He would further submit that if for any reason this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, suitable conditions may be imposed. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Mudukulathur and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Mudukulathur and on further condition that the each petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.4,000/- (Rupees Four thousand only) to the credit of crime No.108 of 2011 before the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 22/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MUDUKULATHUR 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADALADI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. K.KUMARAVEL Advocate SR.No.40822 +1cc to Mr.G.Arjunan, Advocate, Sr.No.40872 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14862 of 2011 Date :22/11/2011 SMA/25.11.2011/7C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/