1 913 ss.3300.08 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3300 OF 2008 Nitesh Hirachand Jain. ... Plaintiff Versus Nandkumar Mahadev Neswankar. ... Defendant ----- Ms. Nita Solanki i/b Kiran Jain and Company for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. ----- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 14 th January, 2011. JUDGMENT: 1 The learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff states that after service of writ of summons, Defendant has not entered appearance within the period stipulated by law. 2 The suit is based on promissory note in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- executed by the Defendant. On receipt of valuable consideration, the Defendant agreed to repay the amount with interest at the rate of 15% per annum. The Plaintiff has placed on record the original promissory note, notice of demand and true copy of the money lender’s licence held by him. 2 913 ss.3300.08 3 In view of sub-Rule (3) of Rule 2 of Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the Plaintiff is entitled to a decree. 4 Hence, suit is decreed in terms of prayer clause (a). 5 The Plaintiff will be entitled to refund of Court-fees as per the rules. [ A.S.OKA, J ]