1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 950 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2935 OF 2003 M/s. Time Prints .. Plaintiffs. vs. M/s. Marine Sports & Anr. .. Defendants. Mr. Vipul Shukla for plaintiffs. Mr. Sunil More for defendants. CORAM : S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 10TH OCTOBER, 2005. P.C. . The present suit is filed on a dishonoured cheque dated 1.7.2000. The principal amount is Rs. 58,300/- and the interest claimed is Rs. 31,395 totalling to Rs. 89,695/- The only defence raised is that the defendant no. 1 is not a partnership firm but a sole proprietary firm. However, a perusal of the cheque on page no. 12 of the plaint shows that the said cheque is signed by the defendant no. 1 as the partner and not as a sole proprietor. In that view of the matter there is no substance in the defence raised by the defendant. 2 There shall be a decree as prayed. Summons for judgment is made absolute accordingly. The suit as well as the summons for judgment both disposed of accordingly.