1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.5328 OF 1999 Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation. ...Petitioner. Vs. Ramdas Sidhu Kamble & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. G.A. Karmarkar i/b. Mr. G.S. Hegde for the Petitioner. Mr.Chetan Patil i/b. Mr.Amit Karkhanis for the Respondents. ..... CORAM :DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. June 27, 2008. P.C.: Consent Terms have been arrived at between the Petitioner and the Respondents which are taken on the record and marked “X”. The Consent Terms have been signed on behalf of the Petitioner by the Divisional Controller, Kolhapur. All the Respondents have put thumb impressions on the Consent Terms. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents has stated before the Court that he has personally identified the Respondents and had duly explained the 2 import and meaning of the Consent Terms to the Respondents. The First Respondent also filed an affidavit dated 26th June 2008 in support of the proposal that is made for resolving the dispute. The Consent Terms envisage that the Petitioner would provide employment to the Third Respondent, the son of the deceased, Ramdas Kamble. The Petitioner also agreed to pay an amount of Rs.50,000/- to the Respondents in full and final payment of back wages and retiral dues of the deceased. Since the dispute has been settled, there shall be an order on the petition in terms of the Consent Terms. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. .....