THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.584 of 2004 JUDGMENT: This Revision is directed against the order, dated 07.11.2003, whereby the complaint filed by the petitioner herein-complainant was dismissed on the ground that the complainant was absent. The impugned order reads as under: - “Complainant is absent. No representation. Process not paid by complainant to issue summons to the accused. Hence, the complaint is dismissed for default under Section 204(4) Cr.P.C. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the process fee and prayed to set aside the impugned order. Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the view that one more opportunity be given to the complainant. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed and the impugned order, dated 07.11.2003, is set aside and consequently, C.C.No.280 of 2000 is restored to the file of XVII Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. The trial Court is directed to receive the process fee paid by the petitioner and proceed with the trial of the case and dispose of the said C.C. as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. ___________________________________ JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA 03rd February 2011 DR