S.B. Cr. Bail Application No. 1438/2008 (Kalpesh Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 15.04.2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. J.P.Chhangani for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, P.P. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and public prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and police investigation diary. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegation against the petitioner is for the offence under Section 411 IPC. From the perusal of the order impugned, it appears that the subject matter of the theft is to be recovered which alleged to have been received by the petitioner and the bail applications filed by the similarly situated co-accused Ram Niwas and Virda Ram have been dismissed by this Court and the case of the petitioner is not on better footing than that of these co- accused. In the circumstances, therefore, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp