1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :: 14.02.2011 CORAM :: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T. SUDANTHIRAM H.C.P(MD)No.23 of 2011 M. Ranjitham, W/o. S. P. Palraj, D.No.24, Kalvinathar Road, Mamsapuram, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District. ..Petitioner - Vs - 1. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2. The Inspector of Police, Mamsapuram Police Station, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 3. P. Subbulakshmi, D/o. A. Paulraj (EB) 4. A. Palraj, S/o. Ayyanar 5. Danasekar, S/o. Palraj R-3 to R-5 are residing at Millkrishnapuram, Rajapalayam Taluk, Virudhunagar District. ..Respondents Writ of Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body of the petitioner's son Palanikumar (30 years) before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner :: Mr. R. Venkatesan For Respondents :: Mr. D. Isaac Manuel for R-1 and R-2 Additional Public Prosecutor Mrs. C. Jaya Indira Patel for R-3 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 ORDER (Order of the Court was delivered by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J.) Mother of detenu has approached this Court with this Habeas Corpus Petition for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body of her son Palanikumar, aged 30 years, before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty. 2. Today, the detenu, aged 30 years, appeared before this Court. On examination, he has stated that on his own, he went to Bangaluru. Due to the differences with his wife, he filed a petition in Crl.O.P.No.13275 of 2010 before this Court. 3. Considering the false allegations contained in the affidavit filed before this Court by the mother of detenu and having regard to the statement made by the detenu that on his own he went to Bangaluru and unnecessarily the third respondent was dragged to this Court, the proper course would be the detenu has to pay costs to the third respondent. Accordingly, a sum of Rs.2,000/- is imposed as costs payable by the detenu to the third respondent. The detenu submitted that he would pay the costs within two days. 4. In view of the fact that the detenu is not in the illegal custody of anyone, this Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed. However, the detenu is directed to pay costs of Rs.2,000/- through the counsel to the third respondent within two days from today. 5. For reporting compliance, post this Habeas Corpus Petition on 18.02.2011. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Accounts) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To: 1. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2. The Inspector of Police, Mamsapuram Police Station, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Dpn akm/17.02.11 /2p-4c/ H.C.P(MD)No.23 of 2011 14.02.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/