IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 577 of 2008 Anil Kumar …… Petitioner Versus The State of Uttarakhand and others …… Respondents Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Arvind Vashisth, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2/State. Mr. H.S. Rawal, Advocate for respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Arvind Vashisth, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos.1 & 2 /State. Mr. H.S. Rawal, Advocate for respondent No.3. 2. Shri Prabhakar Joshi, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the Investigation in the case, found prima facie case against the petitioner and is likely to submit chargesheet before the court concerned in the near future. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 24.07.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 13.10.2008 Shiv