IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH APRIL 2008 / 20TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 11302 of 2008(U) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------ 1. VELLAKANNU, SON OF SANKARAPANDIAN, NAGAMALA. 2. NAGARAJ, SON OF SHANMUGHAN, PAPPATHICHOLA, CHINNAKANAL. 3. VINCENT, SON OF JOSEPH, NELLISSERY, CHOINNAKANAL. 4. MARIAMMA, WIFE OF ASEERVADON, SOORYANELLI, CHINNAKANAL. 5. ARUMUGOM, SON MUTHUKARUPPAN, SHANMUGHA VILASOM, SOORYANELLI. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE), GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, UDUMPANCHOLA, IDUKKI. BY GOVT. PLEADER MR. D. ANIL KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 11302 OF 2008 U = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 9th April, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioners submit that they are occupants of various portions of land in Chinnakanal Village. According to them, they have been frequently summoned by respondents 2 and 3 requiring them to produce their title deeds in respect of the land in their possession. Petitioners submit that they have appeared and produced documents on various occasions, but still repeatedly notices are being issued. They are also apprehending that there is a possibility of their being evicted from the land in their possession. It is in this background the writ petition has been filed. 2. It is seen that the petitioners have already represented to the 2nd respondent against the alleged harassment by filing Ext.P14 and therefore it is a matter for the 2nd respondent to take note of and pass appropriate orders in the matter. This, the 2nd respondent shall do on production of a copy of this judgment. It is also W.P.(C) No. 11302 OF 2008 -2- directed that until decision is taken on Ext.P14, the possession of the petitioners in the land covered by Exts.P1 to P10 shall not be disturbed. 3. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-