IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.755 of 2010 SANJAY CHAUDHARY, S/o Brahmdeo Chaudhary, R/o Village- Hussainpur, P.S.-Rahui, District-Nalanda. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21-06-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The present application has been filed against the order dated 30-4-2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 2 Nalanda at Biharsharif in S .T. No. 34 of 1997. It appears that the trial of the petitioner proceeded substantially in so much so in the year 2008 itself the Prosecution evidence was closed. Subsequently, the defence was given opportunity to examine witnesses. Instead of examining the witnesses, the defence consumed a long time which ultimately compelled the learned trial court to close the defence. This was done on 09-04-2010. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the petitioner preferred Criminal Miscellaneous No. 15787/10 which according to the petitioner, is still pending for admission before this court. It appears that the petitioner herein made an application in the court below for keeping the trial pending as the aforesaid quashing application was pending consideration before this court. Learned trial court gave adequate adjournments to the petitioner in order to obtain a favourable/stay order. As the petitioner failed to obtain any interim order in the pending quashing application, the learned trial court having regard to the facts rejected the said application 2 vide its order dated 30.04.2010 which has been impugned in the present proceedings. This court, on perusal of the materials on record including the impugned order, is of the view that the present application is wholly malafide and mis-placed. This court gets an impression that the petitioner wants to delay disposal of the trial. There is no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. Sujit ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)