RFA No. 27 of 1992 (1) IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH RFA No. 27 of 1992 (O&M) Date of decision: 9.3.2011 Jal Singh and others ...Appellants vs The State of Haryana and another ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Ms. Shriya Chahar Panjeta, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal, J. The landowners have filed the present appeal seeking further enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly the facts of the case are that the State of Haryana vide notification dated 17.11.1982 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') sought to acquire land situated within the revenue estate of village Silokhra, Tehsil and District Gurgaon, for development and utilisation thereof as residential and commercial area in Sector 15 Gurgaon. Notification under Section 6 of the Act was issued on 10.12.1984. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, 'the Collector'), assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ` 60,000/- per acre for chahi, ` 50,000/- per acre for barani and ` 40,000/- per acre for bhoor, banjar and gair mumkin kinds of land. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below, assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ` 32/- per square yard. It is this award which is impugned in the present appeal by the landowners. RFA No. 27 of 1992 (2) Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the issues raised in the present appeal are squarely covered by Division Bench judgment of this court in LPA No. 959 of 1988 Mool Chand and others vs State of Haryana and others, decided on 24.8.2001. Learned State counsel did not dispute the aforesaid factual position. Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in Mool Chand's case (supra), the appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 9.3.2011 (Rajesh Bindal) vs Judge