IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BELASPUR ' WRIT PETITION (S) NO.£&‘E<Z OF 2009 (SEA PETITIONERS ; 1. Ku. Rambati Berukh D/o Late Shri L.N. Berukh, aged about 50 years, Occupation— Service, posted as Superintendent U.D.T.), posted at k d Kanya Ashram, Tongpal, Bloc an Tahsil—Chhindgarh, Dantewada (C.G. ) R/o ikmipara, Chitrakut road, Jadalpur (C.G.) Jitera Kumar Sao s/o Late Shri .P. ac, aged about 41 years, Occupation — Srvic, posted as U.D.T. osted at Kanya Ashrm, Tongpal, - Block an Tahsil- Chhindgarh, District Dantewada (co) R/o Baaji ard, in front of Rathi l W District The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare and‘Devclopment, Raipur (C.G.). Collector, District Collectorate, Dantewada, District Dantewada (ca). ( H g nd T S ee p a d whole sale, Bastar (CG). _ VERSUS RESPONDENTS V '1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Tribal Welfare D.K.S. Department, Mantralaya, Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.). @ ‘ani Sewa 4. The Secretary, Mata Rukhm Formal Party ' Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tahsil 86 District Jagdalpur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ART CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 ICLE 226 OF THE / HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agm'hotri, J. Presen Shrl Anuva Kant T1war1 Advocate tor the petxtloners Shn M P S Bhat1a, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondents 1 to 3 . ORDER ORAL (Passed on 14 dayof September, 2009) Heard learned counsel for the palties. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitionem submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Smr. A.Lall v. State ofChhattisgarh & Othersj, thus the petitioners may be pennitted to make a representation to decide their cases in the light of aforestated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No. 4-Institute is a Government Aided school and the petitioners are the teachers within the sanctioned strength. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents 1 to 3 submits that in the event, the petitioners make a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks hem the date of receipt ofthe representation. 3. In View of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. ‘23 “I sd/- ‘ Satlsh K Agmmt“ 1 2007 (1) BLJ 265 r t: / ’ i WRH‘ PETITION (S) No. 5238 of2009 S€ / PETITIONERS : Ku. Rambati Berukh & another. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others.