IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO.115 (SS) OF 2002 (Old No. 37025/94) 1. Shri Tulsi Ram Arya, aged about 42 years, son of Sri Govind Ram, Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Kashipur, District Nainital. 2. Shir Shiv Ram Arya, aged about 44 years, son of Shri Kishan Ram Arya, resident of Tehsil Kichchal, District Nainital. .............Petitioners. Versus 1. State of Uttar Pradesh through the Secretary Department of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow. 2. District Magistrate, Nainital. ............Respondents. Sri J.C. Belwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Dated 28.03.2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to give effect to the order dated 26.09.1994 (Annexuer-1 to the writ petition) by which the petitioner has been reverted from the post of Naib Tehsildar to the of Seasonal Collection Amin. At the time of the filing of the writ petition, Allahabad High Court has directed to work on the post till 6th February 1995. Thereafter the said order was never extended and as such the petitioner continued as Seasonal Collection Amin. However, the petitioner has brought to the notice of the Court regarding the order dated 12th August, 2005 by which the permission has been given for a limited period of 89 days. The 2 statement of petitioner is that the said permission is still continuing. The petitioner has made a grievance that the he has not been given the selection grade, for which he was entitled for the continuous period of service as a Collection Amin right from 1975. He has also submitted that he is entitled for promotion from the due date of which he was earlier promoted. Since the matter is an old one, therefore, the petitioner is permitted to make a fresh representation, which shall be disposed of by the Commissioner Kumaon Mandal, Nainital by a reasoned order within a period of four months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order. The required documents may also be supplied by the petitioner to the Commissioner, in case, the same is required. Writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) 28.03.2006 Rathour