IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2009 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 3590 of 2007(B) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- PATTOM THANU PILLAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION, MARUTHOORKONAM, KOTTUKAL P.O., BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, V.SANTHAKUMARI AMMA. BY ADV.MR.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY BUILDINGS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. MR.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR FOR R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.RAVIKRISHNAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO. 3590/2007 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE RECOGNITION GRANTED UNDER SECTION 14 (3) (a) OF THE NCTE ACT, 1993 BY NCTE TO PETITIONER COLLEGE D5. 15.11.06. P2:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT. 30.11.06 IN PC. NO.30803/06. P3:- COPY OF THE AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY PETITIONER WITH THE GOVERNMENT DT. 12.12.06. P4:- COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT. 22.12.06. P5:- COPY OF THE REQUEST SENT BY PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT. 10.1.07. P6:- COPY OF THE TRUE COPY OF REQUEST SENT TO IST RESPONDENT BY PETITIONER. P7:- COPY OF THE LETTER DT. 28.12.06 SENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE TSS P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ........................................................................ W.P.(C) No. 3590 OF 2007 ......................................................................... Dated this the 23rd March, 2009 J U D G M E N T The prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to include the name of petitioner's college in the prospectus for the Common Entrance Examination of B.Ed course for the academic year 2007-08, which stands complied with, as submitted by the learned Senior Government Pleader. Obviously, as per the interim order, the main relief sought for was granted in respect of the academic year 2007-08, notwithstanding the stand reflected in Ext. P7. It is submitted by the learned Senior Government Pleader that with respect to the subsequent academic year 2008- 09, no such relief was extended to the petitioner . Obviously, the petitioner has not projected any grievance in this regard, before this court. No amendment to the Writ Petition has also been sought for, for incorporating any relief to be granted in respect of the subsequent academic years . Since the learned Senior Government Pleader submits that no such permission has W.P.(C) No. 3590 OF 2007 2 been granted to any such institutions as in the case of the petitioner for conducting the B.Ed course for the academic year 2008-09, the petitioner cannot be said as aggrieved in any manner for having discriminated in this regard, particularly, when the reason stated by the Government is as a matter of policy. No interference is called for. The Writ Petition is dismissed accordingly. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk