IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 10598 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: June 03, 2011 Anil Kumar .........PETITIONER(S) VERSUS Financial Commissioner (Revenue), Haryana and others ......RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. Nonish Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has not been considered suitable to be appointed as Lambardar for village Panauri, Tehsil Gharaunda, District Karnal for the reason that the petitioner is in unauthorized possession of Gram Panchayat land. The finding is based on spot inspection (Annexure P-2). 2. Learned counsel contends that the father of the petitioner might be in unauthorized possession. The petitioner is living separate from his father. 3. The impugned orders are based on a finding of fact to the effect that the petitioner is in unauthorized possession of Gram Panchayat land. The report has been placed on record as Annexure P-2. Impugned orders have been passed on the basis of relevant material. 4. This Court, in extra ordinary writ jurisdiction, does not find any reason to judicially review the impugned orders. 5. Petition dismissed. 03.06.2011 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE