-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 208 OF 2006 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 460 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO. 1776 OF 1989 Jasmin Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. ... Appellants Versus The Sangli Bank Limited and Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. Pravin Samdani, instructed by Maravoor Wamorkar & Co., for the appellants. Mr. Jai Chinai, instructed by M/s.Divekar & Co., for respondent No.1. Mr. M.M. Vashi for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM: KSHITIJ R. VYAS, C.J. & ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATE: JUNE 12, 2006 . P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. In view of the fact that this Appeal is directed against an ad- interim order passed by the learned single Judge, we hardly see any reason to entertain the appeal. It is stated by the learned counsel for -2- respondent No.1 that the suit is ripe for hearing inasmuch as the entire evidence is recorded. This is an additional ground not to entertain the appeal. In view of this, we request the learned single Judge to hear and dispose of the suit as early as possible, and, in any case, the same is not possible, he would make an endeavour to dispose of the Notice of Motion as early as possible. In view of the above direction, the appeal is disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA, J.