IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42339 of 2008 SANJU DEVI WIFE OF SANJAY KUMAR @ DAUGHTER OF RAM PRAVESH YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- LODIPUR SANPURPUR, P.S.- KHUSRUPUR, DISTRICT- PATNA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 30/06/2010 Heard Mr. Bijay Kumar Pandey learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner has come here for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to Opposite Party Nos. 2 and 3 by the learned court below on 6.8.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the anticipatory bail was granted because the learned court below presumed that there was no allegation against opposite party nos. 2 and 3 but in fact there was allegation against them also. It appears from the complaint petition that Opposite Party Nos. 2 and 3 were accused in a complaint case instituted under Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They are father-in-law and mother-in-law respectively. After considering every aspects 2 and mentioning the reasons opposite party nos. 2 and 3 were admitted to anticipatory bail by the learned court below. The impugned order is correct and no ground of cancellation is made out. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)