IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1625 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- NANUBHAI MANORBHAI PATEL THROGH HIS SON Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BM MANGUKIYA for Petitioner Mr. N.D.Gohil, AGP for the State. Mr. B.T.Rao, Addl. Central Govt. Standing Counsel for Respondent No. 3. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH Date of decision: 26/03/99 ORAL JUDGEMENT Rule. Mr. Gohil, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appears for and waives service of rule on behalf of the State. Mr. Rao, learned Addl. Central Government Standing Counsel appears for and waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No. 3. 2. Mr. Mangukia, the learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement that the petition was filed before the arrest of the petitioner challenging the order passed against the petitioner for detention. Now, the petitioner has been arrested and this petition has, therefore, become infructuous. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with a view to file a fresh petition challenging his detention. Leave is granted. Petition is disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. 26.3.1999. (Kundan Singh,J.) Vyas