C.W.P. No.1140 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.1140 of 2011 Date of Decision. 04.07.2011 Parvinder Kaur d/o Sh. Labh Singh r/o House No.213, Part-2, Bhadalthuha, Near Amloh, Fategarh Sahib. ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through its Home Secretary, Public Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Petitioner is present in person. Mr. Arvind Mittal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Ms. Kirti Singh, AAG, Haryana. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Reply filed by State counsel is taken on record. 2. The petitioner and her husband are present in court and they state that they have no apprehension to their lives and liberty. The respondents have also filed reply through respondent Nos.2, 4 and 6 through affidavit of Sh. Virender Vij, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Panipat. It is stated that ASI, Mukesh Kumar, was deputed for necessary action and on 25.05.2011, he visited the house of the petitioner in Khadi Ashram Colony, Panipat. He has taken the affidavits of parties affirming that they have married according to the Hindu Rites C.W.P. No.1140 of 2011 -2- and Ceremonies and further stated that they are not receiving any threat from the parents of the petitioner and they do not want any action against the parents of the petitioner. The parties present in Court have affirmed the same and they have no further fear from the parents of the petitioner. 3. Taking the statements of the parties on record, I treat the writ petition as closed. The petitioner shall be at liberty to approach this Court for any future contingency if ever she and her husband have any threat for life and liberty. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 04, 2011 Pankaj*