IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.1249 OF 200 CRI.APPLICATION NO.1249 OF 200 CRI.APPLICATION NO.1249 OF 2009 Shri Shankar Sahebrao Shirtode, Applicant. Vs The State of Maharashtra, Respondent. Mr P.L.Sapkale, for the applicant. Mr J.P.Yagnik, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 28/04/200 DATE : 28/04/200 DATE : 28/04/2009 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No. I-278 of 2008 of Manpada Police Station. The said crime has been registered against the applicant for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under section 302, 377 and 201 of IPC. 3. It is the prosecution case that the present applicant allegedly killed an eight years old boy, and before that committed an offence under section 377 of IPC. There is sufficient material on record to connect the present applicant with the alleged offence. I have perused the statements of the complainant, his son and the brother of the deceased Sadir and also the statement of one Indradev Chotelal Pande. The statements of all the three witnesses are sufficient to show the complicity of the applicant in committing the alleged offence. In my opinion, this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on bail. Hence, the application is rejected. . While rejecting the application I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)