IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.974 OF 2009 Neeraj Raghuvanshi ………Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others …Respondents Dated: November 12, 2009 Sri Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate, for the petitioner Sri Nandan Arya, AGA for the State Coram: HON’BLE B.C. KANDPAL, J. HON. DHARAM VEER, J. HON’BLE B.C. KANDPAL, J. (Oral) By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed to issue writ in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent nos.1 & 2 to conduct the expeditious investigation of the FIR dated 11.4.2009 in case crime No.120 of 2009 under sections 420, 467, 468 and 506 IPC lodged at P.S. Kotwali Ranipur, District Haridwar. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. This Court is not supposed to interfere in the investigation being done by the Investigating Agency. Therefore, there is no reason to issue any writ as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner. The petition is devoid of any merits and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in limine. (Dharam Veer, J.) (B.C. Kandpal, J.) 12.11.2009 Rajeev Dang