WP(C) 1373/2008 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI Heard Mr. M. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Pathak, learn ed Central Govt. Counsel, appearing for the respondents. As agreed to by learned counsels for both sides the cases are being disposed of at the admission stage on the basis of the instructions received by the learned Central Govt. Counsel and the records placed before the Court. The petitioner, Sri Manab Kalita, who belongs to the general category, secured 4 8 marks in the selection held. The petitioner, however, was not selected on the ground that he had failed to meet the eligibility conditions with regard to the physical standards prescribed. The petitioner, admittedly, is entitled to the be nefit of the relaxed physical standards prescribed by the advertisement for whic h purpose he was required to submit the necessary certificate in the form prescr ibed by Annexure-III to the advertisement in question. As the said certificate w as not furnished the petitioner in spite of having secured the cut off mark (44 marks for general category candidates) he was not selected for appointment. In WP(C) No.4068/2007 and other connected cases disposed of by this Court on 23. 11.2007 in respect of the same selection process, this Court had taken the view that the candidates who were required to submit the Annexure-III certificate wer e not put to requisite notice. This Court, therefore, directed by the aforesaid order dated 23.11.2007 that the respondents will fix another date for submission of Annexure-III certificate by the petitioners in those writ petitions and on t he basis of such certificates as may be furnished the cases of the petitioners w ill be re-considered. The above directions by the Court were to apply only in re spect of those petitioners who had secured the minimum cut off marks that had be en worked out for each category of candidates i.e. general, ST, SC and OBC. As the petitioner in the present writ petition has secured the minimum cut off m arks and has not been selected for non-submission of the Annexure-III certificat e the present case will be covered by the order dated 23.11.2007 passed in WP(C) No.4068/2007 and other connected cases. The writ petition, therefore, is disposed of with the same directions as contain ed in the order dated 23.11.2007 passed in WP(C) No.4068/2007 and other connecte d cases