^ C^ l^ INThjE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G) W.P.(S)NO. |S^ 2-0F2011 PETITIONER w ^^. ^M^' ss^ ..\,^c:'' ^ \fl »'-''"..A'y\/y -.iW^' / Smt. Jemma Kujur, aged about 36 years, W/o Late Shri Arvind Kujur, Working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-111, Middle School Bhadi, Baikunthpur, R/o Fundurdihari, Mahuapara, Ambikapur, Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ?C%s!M?i^x f^y..-' -_'<^A ^•:'//^?"'^\ ®fe1 9 y '! %..v—~//^ ^ -:1. State of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur(C.G-) 2. The Collector, Korea (C.G.) 3. The Director of Fisheries, Raipur, Distt. Raipur(C.G.) 4. The District Education Officer District Korea (C.G.) ^5. Ghief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Baikunthpur, Distt. Korea (C.G.) ^ WRI'LPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA II ^1^^^^:[. * '^^^^ J HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAKH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) No. 1352 of2011 PETITIONER : Smt. Jeema Kujur RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri. J. Present: Shri D.N.Prajapati, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govemment Advocate for the State/ respondent No. 1 to 4. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 14th day ofMarch, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in this petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in Prakask Kumar Das v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others . Thus, this petition may also be disposed of in the same terms. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the.writ petition is disposed ofwith liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach the respondent authorities to claim appointment on regular post in accordance with the policy of compassionate appointment. In case such representation is made, the concemed authority shall take decision expeditiously in accordance with law, on its own merits and perspective. Ashok SattehK.A^otn Judge ' W.P. No.^4203/2010. decided on 05.08.2010 1