1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Second Appeal No. 316 of 2009 1. PRAKASH S/O NAMDEORAO CHANGOLE R/O BUTIBORI, DIST NAGPUR .. PETITIONER/S VERSUS 1. SHRIRAM S/O NAMDEORAO CHANGOLE AND OTHERS R/O POLICE LINE TAKALI, NAGPUR 2. NILKANTH S/O NAMDEORAO CHANGOLE R/O POLICE LINE TAKALI, NAGPUR 3. KEWALDAS S/O NAMDEORAO CHANGOLE R/O BHUPESH NAGAR, PLOT NO.17, NAGPUR 4. GYANESHWAR S/O NAMDEORAO CHANGOLE R/O BHUPESH NAGAR, PLOT NO.17, NAGPUR 5. SMT. MANDA W/O ARVIND GHODE THR HER LR\'S SHRI AM GHODE R/O NEAR BUDDHA VIHAR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR, NARKHED NAGPUR 6. KU. SARITA D/O ARVIND GHODE R/O NEAR BUDDHA VIHAR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR, NARKHED 7. KU. LEENA D/O ARVIND GHODE R/O NEAR BUDDHA VIHAR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR, NARKHED 8. KU. NEWTON D/O ARVIND GHODE R/O NEAR BUDDHA VIHAR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR, NARKHED 9. KU. SWAPNA D/O ARVIND GHODE R/O NEAR BUDDHA VIHAR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR, NARKHED 10. KU. DIWYANI D/O ARVIND GHODE R/O NEAR BUDDHA VIHAR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR, NARKHED 11. SMT. LALITHA W/O HARIKISAN INGLE R/O TIKAR ROAD, NEAR OLD TELE. EXCHANGE, BAITUL .. RESPONDENT/S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A.V. Khare, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.S. Nayak, Advocate, for the respondent no.1. Mr. K.K. Pillai, Advocate, for the respondent no. 3. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : AUGUST 13 , 2009 . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The second appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law. “(1) Whether a co-owner has a right to sell more property than which falls to his share with the implied consent of the other co-owners?” Learned counsel Shri R.S. Nayak waives notice of final hearing on behalf of the respondent no.1. Learned counsel Shri Pillai waives notice of final hearing on behalf of the respondent no.3. Learned counsel Shri Kadukar waives notice of finial hearing on behalf of respondent nos. 2, 4 to 6. C.A.S. No. 629/2009 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the contents of the civil application. Since the second appeal is admitted on a substantial question of law, it would be necessary to stay the effect and operation of the judgment and decree passed by the trial and the first appellate Court, during the pendency of the second appeal. Hence, the prayer made in the civil application is granted. C.A. is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE RMP