HIGH COURT§F CHHATTISéARH: BILASPUR MW Writ Petition (Ci No. 4404 of 2008 Petitioner Radheshyam Jaiswal, S/o. Late Jagannath Prasad, Agad abcut 52 years, Rio. vmage Mayapur, Post Chandoura, Tahsii Praiappur, District Sarguja (Q6). W RESPNDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through Director, Dérectcrata, Anima! Vetert‘nary Services, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. 2. Deputy Director, Anima! Veferinary Services, Baikunthpur, Dist. Korea (CG). 3. Coiiector, OfFxce of the Coiiecmr, Baikunthpar, Dist. Kara“; (CG) {Writ Petition umer Articie 226 of the Consiitution of mdfa) $8: Hon’ble Mr. $atish K. Agnihotri, J. Present. Mr. SK. Kwhwaha. céumé} fef thé iaétitimér. Mr. Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate Generak fer the State. ORAL oRDER (Passed on this 15‘“ day ofsaptember, 2008) With the consent of leaxnsd calmsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finally. 2} Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner doee not want to press this petition on merits at this stage. However, the petitioner prays that the representation dated 7-5—2008 (Annexure Pf?) pemiing before the concemeé authorities may be directed to be considereti and decided, in accordance with law, Within the prescribed time. 3) Shn‘ Harit appeazing for the State submits that there is no mason why the pending representation should not be éeeided by the concemee anthority, expeditiousiy, pmferably within a period of two weeks. 4) in View of {he foregoing, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned authorities to eonsioer and decide the \\ representation as stated above, in accordance with law, on its owfi \ gx; §"%%W— merits, as €ar1y as. possible, pwferabiy Within a pen’od 0f two waeks from the date: of receipt of a of capy this ordm" ”JV //’_W Raju Sdl- Agnlho . tri Satish KI Judge