IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.32740-M of 2009 Date of Decision:13.1.2011 Jatinder Kaur and another .... Petitioners Versus The State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. S.P. Soi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and also directing respondents No.4 and 5 not to interfere in the personal lives of the petitioners. Notice of motion was issued on 23.12.2009. One year have passed, no report with respect to the interference in the personal lives of the petitioners at the instance of respondents No.4 and 5 has been brought to the notice of this Court. As such, it is apparent that there is no threat perception. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 13.1.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE