1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2105 OF 2011 (Sau. Shubangi Wasant Sonbhadre vs. Chintaman Sadashiv Buradkar) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri P.N. Shende, Advocate for the petitioner. -------- CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J. DATED : JULY 8, 2011 By the above petition, the petitioner, who is the original plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No. 671/2008, challenges the order dated 8/2/2011 whereby the trial Court, i.e. learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur has allowed the amendment application filed by the defendant, i.e. respondent herein, resultantly the defendant is allowed to amend the written statement so as to incorporate paragraph 16-A, which is the proposed amendment mentioned in the application for amendment filed before the trial Court. 2 It is required to be noted that the suit is at the stage of hearing of the application for temporary injunction (Exh. 5). The reasons why the said amendment is required to be incorporated in the written statement have been stated in the application filed by the defendant. Having considered the reasons mentioned in the amendment application, the trial Court has allowed the said amendment. In my view, no fault can be found with the discretion exercised by the trial Court. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE khj