CRM-M No.17959 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : November 17, 2011 1. CRM-M No.17959 of 2011 2. CRM-M No.17969 of 2011 Pawanpreet Kaur vs State of Punjab and another, *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. G.S.Kaura, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG Punjab for respondent No.1. Mr.G.N.Malik, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This order shall dispose of CRM-M Nos.17959 and 17969 of 2011, as both these petitions arise from the same FIR. The petitioner seeks cancellation of bail granted to Jodhvir Singh and Jasbir Kaur, in case FIR No.78, dated 6.10.2010, registered under Sections 406, 498-A of the IPC, at Police Station Phase-VIII, SAS Nagar Mohali. Parties are present in person. With the intervention of learned counsel, a tentative settlement has been arrived at between the parties. It has been agreed that for the time being, the petitioner and her two children will continue to stay in Mohali. It has further been agreed that after the CRM-M No.17959 of 2011 ::2:: elder child completes his 10th Class, the parties will take a decision whether the petitioner and the children would continue to stay in Mohali for the purpose of higher education and sports etc. or whether they would move back to Ludhiana with respondent No.2-Jodhvir Singh. It has also been agreed that Jodhvir Singh will continue to pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- per month to the petitioner which will start from 5.12.2011 and will be transmitted on 5th of every successive month in the bank account of the petitioner viz 602701011001203 of Vijya Bank. The petitioner has very fairly stated that in case respondent No.2 continues to adhere to this settlement, she would have no objection if he files a petition for quashing of the instant FIR and the earlier complaint filed by her. She also undertakes to withdraw the petition filed by her under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. In his turn, respondent No.2-Jodhvir Singh has stated that in case he does not pay the amount of Rs.25,000/- per month, the petitioner may revive the petition under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C and he will not oppose the grant of Rs.25,000/- per month as maintenance. In this view of the matter, the petitioner does not wish to press these petitions. Consequently, the petitions stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 17, 2011. JUDGE `kk'