Cr.MMO 82/2009 15.5.2010Present: Mr. Sanjay Dutt Vasudeva, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anshul Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. J.S. Rana, Assistant Advocate General, for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 4 to 8. Cr.M.P. No. 338/2010. Vide order dated 1.4.2010, the petition Cr.M.M.O. No. 82/2009 was dismissed on the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner as he intended to seek alternative remedy available to him. Now, the instant application has been moved for modification/clarification of the said order that alternative remedy will also include the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The matter stands already disposed of with the above liberty. It is clarified that alternative remedy would mean any remedy available to the petitioner under the law. With these observations/clarifications, the application stands disposed of. Dasti Copy. May 15, 2010 (Surinder Singh),J (cm)