V &• -f.u PETITIONER IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT QF C.G. AT BILASPUR CONTEMtTCASE (C| N0. StLV\ OF 2011 Single Benel 'M.A Mansoori ,Aged about 64Years, S/OLate Haji Abdul Shakhur , R/0 Post Jarhagarh Near Samlaya Mandir, Ambikapur ,District Sarjuga,Chhatisgarh VERSUS RESPONDENT (Contemnor) L.N Tyagi, Executive Engineer Water Resources Department, :\" \^\ <^^s^ L.—- p(®' ,gd^ »«^' ^-r Divisidn No.2,Ambikapur Chhattisgarh CONTEMPTPETITION UNDER SECTION 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE ^15 OF THE CONSTITUTIOW OF INDIA JLL ss^y vi (<-) ^W 3H^fT Sti*tiq» \ 75^ «41'41M<1, ®Tll<'Hil6,[s|dl'My,< -<2^.:.ca^cJ.r^:.Z.L'.J/^L* •^,200 311^1 Tig^ (^3^?) TOnw^feTSii^T SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohai 01-08-2011 Shri Majid Ali, counsel for the Heard. This petition has been file disobedience of order dated 07-111 Petition (S) No.3535/2009. Learned counsel for the pel recovery was challenged by filing tt allowed and the order of recovery w further directed that the amount, if a the petitioner and payable with simpl counsel further submitted that the an refunded to the petitioner. However, to the petitioner, have not been paid legal notice given to the Executive Ei The order passed by this Coi the amount and that the same shall per annum. It appears that the refunded to the petitioner, but the pe no specific time has been given required to be completed within a res Considering that the principal am not indined to issue notice respondent authority should make interest is paid, as directed by this C 4ll<llcl<fl'< llfCT ^f fezt <lal«;l< ^aifipran^ir Shrivastava, J. Ipetitioner. )d by the petitioner alleging willful 1-2009 passed by this Court in Writ jtioner submits that the order of the (e writ petition. The writ petition was |as quashed by this Court. The Court jready deducted, shall be refunded to |e interest @ 6% per annum. Learned |iount, which was deducted, has been fill date, the interest, which is payable even after representation made and (igineer. (irt on 07-11-2009 directing refund of Ijie payable with simple interest @ 6% prii|icipal amount of recovery has been jtitioner has not paid interest. Even if, ^i the order, the whole exercise is jsonable period. |amount has been paid, at present, 1 |to the respondent. However, the frayment of the interest. In case, no (3urt within a period of two month, the V, iT,(RHRlira'—F»140—2/2011—1,50,000. ^,- 'S^ "41'41riAI, 8)Tll<'H'|io, f^CIKiy Cw4 • C^Cc)^. 2^^ f ^^.....................^................/...^ 200 sii^i Traqr (i?^'"*1') 311^1 ^T f4-f w an^i *tii°b ^nwdfersn^ ^^2- s; Tumane petitioner would be at liberty to reviv^ the order beforethe respondent authj With the aforesaid observatiorl, +l<l[i'l<fl'< *IW<"if tf fSVt <("lt$l< ^'siRinsii^r i. The petitioner shall place a copy of prity. |, the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge