THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED C.R.P.No.5932 of 2010 Dated: 16-12-2010 Between: Smt. Suneeta Parswam @ Suneeta Kanchanapalli ………..Petitioner and Venkata Satya Narayana Kanchanapalli …………Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED C.R.P.No.5932 of 2010 ORDER : This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the docket order dated 28- 10-2010 in O.P.No.215 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Narsaraopet, Guntur District. 2. It is stated that the petitioner has filed the above O.P. against the respondent, who is her husband, seeking restitution of conjugal rights. It is further stated that since she is residing at Atlanta, USA, she appointed her father viz., P.Kondala Rao as her General Power of Attorney (GPA) to represent the case before the Court below on her behalf. While so, on 28- 10-2010, she appeared before the Court below and filed her chief affidavit to record ex parte evidence, but the Court below rejected the same with certain objections. She complied those objections and requested the Court below to mark her chief affidavit as exhibit. But the Court below refused to receive the same and again returned the same on the ground that a fresh chief affidavit to be filed by the petitioner as there are some deletions. But, however, as she had to go to USA on some urgent work, she requested the Court below to post the matter to the next day. But the Court below rejected her request and instead, directed her to appear on 06-12-2010. Aggrieved by the same, she approached this Court and filed the present revision petition requesting to permit her father to present her chief affidavit as her GPA before the Court below. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the father of the petitioner i.e. her GPA Holder was directed to represent the matter by filing the chief affidavit of the petitioner, and he further submits that the said affidavit has also been recorded by the trial Court. But however, because of the filing of this revision petition before this Court and the same is pending consideration, the Court below is not able to dispose of the main O.P. Therefore, he prayed that the present revision petition may be disposed of with a direction to the Court below to dispose of the main O.P., within a reasonable time. 4. In the circumstances, recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of directing the Court below to proceed with the matter on receiving the chief affidavit of the petitioner filed through her GPA, if not received, and pass appropriate orders in O.P.No.215 of 2009. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. As a sequel to disposal of revision petition, C.R.P.M.P.No.7280 of 2010 is also disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ December 16, 2010 JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED Note: Issue C.C. in two days. B/o. kvr