-.r* is ; writ Evetition No. 7L/7Af /2uo2 PET I’T‘ IO ' 3K“ Mahadeo sai Paikra, aged about l 1. Dinesh Pandey s/o Late, Sheshu . narayan Pandey, aged about 32 years° ‘ 2-Sukhdayal Sai paikra s/o —Late ‘7 g) f ‘ 5O years , _ Both are r/o of ‘kunkuri‘, P a S .H. - Kunkuri, Dist . Jush'our (C .G .) Vs. 3ESPONDENTS z 1.state of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretary, Raipur (C.G.) 2.Additional Collector, Jushnurnéggr Dist . ._ Jushpurnagar . 3-Supritendent of Police , Ju’shpu: nag Dist - — Jushpurnagar (C .G .) 4. Collector, Jushpurnagar, Dist-~ Jushpurnagar (C.Go) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226E72227 OF COVIST‘ETUTIO'F OF INDTA: al HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU'R WRIT PETITION N0. 1474 of2002 : Dinesh Pandey & another. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. Present: Shr Jeet Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. i Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. GA. for the State/reSporidents. (Psed on 0 da of April, 20 10) By this petition, the petitioner seeks following reliefs: “i. This Hon’bie Court be pleased t send or the entir record relating to this ated allegation for its kind perusal. This Hon’ble Court kindly be pleased to direct the responden No. 3 to quash out the enquiry if it is pending. ii. This Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct respondent o. 2 8c 4 to retum his (peitier No. 1) own personal amount of payment and loan of Rs. 10,700/- to the petitioner No. 1. iv. This Hon’ble Court be further pleased to grant xamplory compensation amount to the petitioner No. l for suifering his unnecessar mental torture and financi crisis. v. Any oer relief, this Honle Court deems tit d roper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in favour ofthe petitioner be also granted. vi. Cost ofth petition be also granted to‘the petitioner.” e . 0n perusl of the reliefs, it is nt clear asto Whether any enquiry is pending as the petitioner submits that if an nquiiy is pending, the sam e e may be quashed. The petitioner further seeks for a further direction to the respondents to return his personal amount of payment of Rs. 10,700/- and iiirther, payment of exemplary compensation for his unnecessary mental torture and financial crisis. o f e st ll. t i N ton e y al th ’b an p WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ORDER (ORAL as 5 y 2 a o 2 o r\,/ 3. The petition does not disclose any cause of actlon except that the petitioner was stopped at Jashpur Barrier and the respondent No. 4, Without naming the boncerned person, seized a sum of Rs. 10,700/- when the petitioner made it clear that he was transporting eattles in Tata Sumo to help the people not for any other purpose. Thereafter, the petitioners, who were constables were placed under suspension and subsequently they were reinstated also on 15.5.2002. Because of mental tension, caused by the respondent, son ofthe petitioner No. 1 met with an accident. The petitioner could not use his money as it was seized by the respondents at the barrier. The facts stated in the petition does not make out any case asto how the petitioners, being Constable, were owning a Tata Sumo and how they were carrying cattle in their vehicle and whether they had any permission. The petitioners have made a self same statement that a sum of Rs. 10,700/- was seized at the barrier but not document has been tiled in that regard nor any FIR was lodged. The entire case seems to be on the basis guessworks on wild and vague allegations. Shri Bhatia, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits P, a“ that the facts have not been narrated properly and no case has been made out for interference ofthis Court. No cause of action arises from the facts stated in the petition. It is well settled that without there being any specific pleadings and prayer, no relief can be granted. Thus, the case is dismissed for want of cause of action arising from unspecific facts and proper pleadings. The petition is frivolous. Consequently, M(W)P No. 1056/2002, is also dismissed. ¢ Sdl- . l Satish K. Agnihotri l Judge M “t Amit