IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition N0. ' " ' / /2001 • Prabhu Neth Mishra, son of Shri Chhotakan Mishra,aged about 46 years, Occu'^ation Corporator, ward N3 • 2o» Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, Chbattisgarh. .^ ^.s'" ^^' • 2. Rajendra Singh Arora, son of Shri Suj an sing'n Arora, aged '•ayout 45 years, occupation - ^ Corporator, ward N0. 22,Muni- cipal corporafcion,Bhilai,C.G. \6^.^^'^ 3 ^'^Cy-'' -.y?"" ^•" Bashishtha Narayan Mishra, son of shri s.N.Mishra,age<3 about % years, Occupatxon- Corporator, ward N0. 37, Municipal corpora- tion Bhilai, ehhattisgarh. PETITIONERS .—.-•i.•-" VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh,through Secretary, Department of local Self Governmsit,Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Municipai Corporation,Bhilai, ,\;, through its Commissioner, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh. ?/* 3 . Mayor, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, ehhattisgarh. -2- 4. Abdul Habib son of Abdul Wahld,resident of Street NO. 6, Sector - 10 Bhilai, Chhattisgarh. 5. Moinuddin son of Sirajuddin, resident of Khalabadi,Durg, Chhattisgarh. @ RESPONOENTS PET-tTION- ONDEB ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT INTHE NATURE OF CERTIORARI.MANDAIflJS. PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SU ITABLE_^S,1T/WRITS . DIREeTJ£R^DIRE£2^NS. ORDER / ORDERS. T^ 11 1->!T« -T/TTT -• •» r-8 /^ t~-. -.Fa_T-l3=—r^-^m -r , iFi-e"^ .*.. XI-HC-22 StI^T'W 'f^iW 311^1 yt^H^ ^rf?tT -T5[ "^RI^PT, 'S^FIS, ft<'IW1< sv^f ira^ __L2.-.^M!.J.Q.i.7/3^ MWWI grHKO v^ 200 ^^T' 3n^?T e^aiW •^<i *Wl<-l<fl-l t<|t|dT'?1S<3> <F»1^1< i? aip<f*i sn^i 15-3-2002 Shri Maumdia Shriv^tevaJ Shri Gautham Bhadiui, 0.4 Hcard. Advocate for fhe petitioner. ^ for respoadent No. 1. that fhis petition is ^ainst the of private respoiidents No. 4 and Shri Shrivastava submitted aUotment of certain plots in favoi 5 by Miuucipal Corporation, Bhila|i. Couascl for the State subitutted that contractual rates have been approved. It is submitted thi made. Shri Shrivastava subinittec / show tfaat any private parly tieis b< Having considered fhe fact and naaterial available on it fhe repiescntatiDu has not been that Anacxure 16-A docs n^t cn joiacd as a party. and cireunistances of the case recold opinioa on merits, in fhe opuuon that if the petitioner inakes a peti' as weU as fhe persons in whose the same shaU be consideicd and wifhout expressing any ^f fhis Coiirt, it is just and pTopcr (on jonring Municipal Corporation ^vour the order has becn passed, anjd decidcd on its own inerits in accordaace wifh the law after notii ^ng aU partfes concemed. -_•- 1 ^ •> <-> ^ XI-HC-22 sn^i^i f<-li+ 311^1 ^\c^ •9^<{ fiKw^ 'Svi, •^Wv\f, ©•al'y'is,Ic«ni'yy SW^l 'VS^K ^^.Ll^^I^/ ^t^St' sn^i ^giwdfl^ With fhis obseryation, ttu^ open to the parties to agitefe fhc| case such an cventuality arises. «i>i<<(<-i4-f wivS ^ fezt <[«i<$i< ^TaiPtnsii^i petitwn is disposed of, leaving inatter in accofdance with law in Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge