: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.546 OF 2009 M/s.Indokem Limited ... Applicant V/s. P.J. Mathew ... Respondent Mr.A.Daver for Applicant Mr.S.S. Redekar for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: NOVEMBER 7, 2009 P.C.: 1. The civil revision application has been filed against the dismissal of the suit filed u/s 6 of the Specific Relief Act. The impugned order is dated 2.4.2008 which has been passed by the City Civil Court in S.C. Suit No.4102 of 2006. The plaintiff i.e. the applicant herein claimed that the respondents had broken open a garage in which it parked a car. The car was removed out of the garage and parked on the road. It is the case of the plaintiff that the defendant then locked the garage with his own lock. In these circumstances, the plaintiff has filed the present suit. The trial Court on scrutinising the evidence led before it held that the car was not in the name of the plaintiff but was owned by M/s.Raico Private Limited. The certificate of taxation produced by the plaintiff indicated that the owner of the car was M/s.Raico Pvt. Ltd. In these circumstances, the Court held that the suit could not have been filed by a : 2 : person who was not aggrieved since the car was not owned by Indokem Limited. 2. The evidence on record did not in any manner indicate that the plaintiff was parking its car in the suit garage and that the garage had been broken open by the defendant. In these circumstances, the suit filed u/s 6 of the Specific Relief Act has been dismissed. I see no reason to differ with the findings of the trial Court which in my opinion, are based on the evidence on record. 3. Civil revision application dismissed.