FNTHE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. s. No. 3g0j OF 2009 gmggg gmgh PETITIONER RM. Quraishi son of late Rasool Mohammed Quraishi , aged about—54 years, Fisheries Inspector in the office of the Assistant Director , Fisheries, Dhamtari R]o in front of Anjurnan School, Chameli vChauk, Aamapara, Dhamtari Distt. Dharntari (C.G.). VERSUS ; —‘ESPONDENTS 1.! State of-Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Agriculture (Fisheries) Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Fisheries , Raipur (C.G.) 3. "Assistant Director, Fisheriés, Dhamtari Distt. Dhamtari . b Praks'h Kekate S/o Not known, Fisheries ° Inspector, in the office of, Assistant Director, Kanker Distt. Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ' s ew HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGH $T BtLASPUR (Hon. Mr. Jus€ice PrEtinker EDEwakei') Writ Pemion (S) No. 3301 0f 23% PETITIONER RM. Quraishi VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattésgarh and another Shri M.K. Sinha , counsei for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.. Thakur, Dy. AG. & Ms. Sunita Jain, PL for the respondents/State. WRH PETHTION UNDER ART!CLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA O R D E R (10.07.2099) finatiy. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the matter is heard Chaiienge in this petition is to the order dated 29.6.2009 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.1 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from the office of Assistant Director, Dhamtari to the office of Assistant Director, Kanker on administrative grounds. Counsei for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a victim of frequent transfer. He further submits that yesterday i.e. on 97.2009 he and his wife met with an accident and received injuries inciuding fracture. He submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with iiberty to make representation. He aiso seeks a direction to the authorities concerned to decide the said representation expeditiousiy. To this prayer of the petitioner, counsel for the respondents/State has no objection. Accordingiy, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. if the petitioner makes a representation within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the same would be decided by the authorities concerned within a further period of three weeks from the date of its re‘ceipt strictiy in accordance with law. Tili then the impugnedorder shall not befgiven effect to. r’ V Sd/— f Pritinker Diwaker Judge i