IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3117 of 2009 BINOD KUMAR CHAUDHARY Versus CHAIRMAN & M.D.OF CENTRAL BANK ----------- 2 6.3.2009 After some arguments, counsel for the petitioner would seek leave of this Court to withdraw this application in order to avail statutory alternative remedy under Section 17(1) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter to be referred to as ‘the SURFACI Act’). This Court, noticing that the impugned notice under Section 13(4) under the SURFACI Act is dated 15.1.2009, would give leave to the petitioner to file an appeal within a period of ten days from today. In the event, such an appeal is filed within a period of ten days, the appellate authority, keeping in view that this writ application was filed under misconceived notion and advice, would condone the delay and decide the appeal on merit. Accordingly, this application is permitted to be withdrawn with the aforementioned observations and liberty. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)