CWP No.10061 of 2007 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.10061 of 2007 Date of Decision: 29.04.2009 Satyawan Singh ...Petitioner V E R S U S State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: Mr. C. M. Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Ravi K. Mattoo, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. H. N. Mehtani, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. Ashok Kumar Sehrawat, Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr. Raman Wahi, Advocate for respondent No.5. Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for respondent No.7. AJAY TEWARI J. (ORAL) The petitioner has made two prayers. The first prayer is that he has to be assigned proper seniority as per the roster point. This prayer has been conceded by the respondents in paras 7, 8 and 9 of the written statement and it has been stated that the delay in giving the proper seniority to the petitioner has occurred due to some reasons beyond the control of the CWP No.10061 of 2007 -2- respondents. The second prayer of the petitioner is that in fact one post of Treasury Officer had fallen to the share of the reserved category but wrongly a general category candidate i.e. respondent No.4 was appointed thereto. With regard to this prayer, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would be satisfied if the respondents permit him to file a representation and decide the same by passing a speaking order. Consequently, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to finalize the seniority of the petitioner and to decide any representation which he may make within next fifteen days (with regard to his claim to be appointed as Treasury Officer) from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Both the decisions be taken within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation regarding claim No.2. ( AJAY TEWARI ) April 29, 2009 JUDGE ashish