IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17703 of 2011 Sushila Devi Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 29.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 06 of 2006 registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 39/44 of the Electricity Act. The accusation is of consuming electricity by committing theft. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the bonafide consumer and loss has not been calculated and the case has been registered under the repeal Act. This Court is not inclined to interfere since the case was instituted in 2006. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day considering the aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders and 2 prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be transmitted to the learned C. J. M. Vaishali at Hazipur in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 06 of 2006 at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)