THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Petition No.3018 of 2008 (Dated : 13-08-2010) Between: K.Ramesh Goud S/o Rajamallu And another …Petitioners A n d The State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., and another …Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Petition No.3018 of 2008 ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been filed by K.Ramesh Goud and K.Venkatesh Goud under Section 482 Cr.P.C., with a prayer to quash the complaint in Crime No.113 of 2008 on the file of Ghatkesar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District registered for the offences under Sections 427 and 447 IPC. 2. The 2nd respondent herein presented report before the Station House Officer, Ghatkesar P.S., Cyberabad alleging inter alia that she purchased house Plot bearing No.89 admeasuring 200 square yards in Survey No.729 under registered sale deed dated 11.3.2004 and that petitioners herein grabbed her plot and constructed compound wall and room therein. The Station House Officer, Ghatkesar P.S received the report and registered a case in Crime No.113 of 2008 for the offences under Sections 427, 447 IPC. Hence, this Criminal Petition by the petitioners-accused in Crime No.113 of 2008. 3. Notice to the 2nd respondent came to be ordered on 9.6.2008. The 2nd respondent entered appearance through a counsel. When the Criminal Petition came up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the 2nd respondent. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and perused the material brought on record. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners purchased Plot No.91 under registered sale deed dated 10.5.2004 from R.Krishna S/o Shivalingam and since then, the 1st petitioner has been in possession and enjoyment of the same. A further submission has been made that when the police tried to interfere with the civil disputes between the 1st petitioner and the 2nd respondent-complainant, the 1st petitioner filed W.P.No.10890 of 2008 and obtained interim direction to the Inspector of Police, Ghatkesar Police Station, not to interfere with the civil disputes between the parties, vide W.P.M.P.No.14193 of 2008. He would also contend that the disputes between the 1st petitioner and 2nd respondent-complainant is purely civil in nature, and therefore, continuance of the criminal proceedings against the petitioners amounts to abuse of process of law. 6. I have gone through the report presented by 2nd respondent before the Station House Officer, Ghatkesar P.S. The English translated copy of the complaint reads as hereunder:- “ I, Moosapeta Lakshmi W/o Krishna Reddy, aged about 28 years, Occ: House hold R/o H.No.8-4-370/123, Rajnagar, Borabanda, Hyderabad do hereby submit that I am owner of Plot No.89, admeasuring 200 Sq. yards in Sy.No.729. The said Plot I purchased from Lakshmaiah S/o Malaaih under Registered document No.3653/2004, dated 11.03.2004. Since the date of purchase I am in possession of the said Plot. On 26-4-20089 when we inspected our plot, same was covered by a compound wall and a room was also constructed thereon. On enquiry it is revealed that Ramesh Goud and his brother Venkatesh Goud both are R/o Korremula Village, grabbed my plot and constructed the compound wall and the room thereon. Therefore, requested to do justice to me”. 7. The petitioners placed on record the Photostat copy of the registered sale deed dated 10.4.2004 whereunder, the 1st petitioner purchased 200 Square yards of house plot bearing No.91 from R.Krishna S/o Shivalingam. The disputes between the petitioner and 2nd respondent is predominantly civil in nature, which are required to be resolved by a civil Court. Initiation of criminal proceedings, in the given facts and circumstances of the case amounts to abuse of process of law. 8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed quashing the proceedings in Crime No.113 of 2008 on the file of Ghatkesar P.S, Ranga Reddy District. _____________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J Dt.13-08-2010 RAR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.3461 of 2010 (Dated : 13-08-2010)