>5 s.'?^? y ^il'/Sf- s; o^&ff^- ® Q IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION fC) N0. \^^ OF 2010 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS ^' 5. 1. ^ Satyanarayan Mishra Son of Late Vaidyanath Mishra, aged about 57 years, Resident of Quarter No. 243/2, Near Electric Sub Station, Shivajinagar, Korba (C.G.). Prahlad Rai Agrawal Son of Late Omprakash Agrawal, aged aboyt 50 years, Occupation Business. Roopendra Singh Son of Harihar Singh, aged about 35 years, Occupation Business. Subhash Chandra Sharma Son of Late Mahaveer Sharma, aged about 50 years, Occupation Business. Raghuveer Chandra Son of Ramadhar Chandra, aged about48 years, Occupation Contractor. Petitioner Nb.2 to 5 are residents of Premnagar, Rajgamar, District Korba (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through The Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). i^B^ (S /2. The Deputy Secretary, Chhattisgarh Government, Revenue and Calamity Management Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). / 3. The Collector, Korba, District Korba (C.G.). /4. The Nazool Officer (Tahsildar), Korba, District Korba (C.G.). y5. Creative Career Society (City College), Kprba (C.G.), throifgh Director Mr. Pramod Jain Son of not known, aged about 56 years, Resident of Indira Stadium, T. P. Nagar, Korba (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS As given in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As given in the cause title. 3. PARTICULARS OF THE CAUSE/IMPUGNED ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETITION IS MADE (i) OrderNo.- F-4-105/Seven-l/07 (ii) Dated - 31.10.2009 fAnnexure P-1) (iii) Issued by - RespondentNo.2 i« ^ ffinBiii^fflin! K& HIGH_COURT_C)F_CyHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NOJ 784 OF 2010 PETITIONERS Satyanarayan Mishra & Others RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. Shri Jitendra Pali, Advocate for the respondent No.5. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 1st day ofJuly, 2010) 1. Learned counse] appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not want to press this petition oh merit at this stage, however, the petitioners seek a direction to the Collector, Korba, to consider and decide their pending representations dated 11-2-2010 (Annexure - P/7) 17-2-2010 (Annexure - P/8) in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. 2. At this Juncture, Shri Bhaduri, learned counsel appearing for the State submits that if the representations as aforestated are pending consideration the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, after considering the cases of the concerned parties, as early as possible preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri judge