T ^y • XI-HC—78 ^^\ ^T k^ TI^T ^TI^T ^FqW *iWVM (h*1ict» . ~3^r ^ii^i<nq, ^til^^Ko, f®i<ni^^< ^.^^ifP.C.O.. -^2003 3TT^?r TRW ( ^i^^) 1'^TTW^rf^^T^T Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Jl w.p.rciN<b yqars. (Petition under Article 22)6 Petitioners : 1. Smt. Madliu aged 42 2. Smt. Priy^ aged 40 Both R/o TeliUandha District Raipur | Vs Nagar Palik Nagar Palik Ni^ y^ars Resppndent 26.3.2009 Mr. Sanjay Shyam Agarwal, Mr. Sanjay K Agarwal, Advocat| respondent. Heard. By the instant petition under petitioneris praying for direction to the as per their own letter dated 1.2.2009 Learned counsel for the disposed ofin terms ofthe observations (c) No. 1118/2009 (Jagdeo Singh Ga decided on 26.3.2009. Learned counsel for the the instant petition is disposed of in the In view of above, the instant pel dated 26.3,2009 passed by this Court ii Garcha Vs. Nagar Palik Nigam, Raipur) Certified copy as per rules. tC.G.) FfJgam, Raipur, Through Commissioner, |am, Raipur (CG) chl^id^l^ ^i*i<riT ^f 'fe^t ipai^K ^T 3ff?W W^T ustice Dhirendra Mishra .1279/2009 of Constitution of India) Nebhani, W/o Shri Arjun Lal Nebhani, Nebhani, W/o Shri Ishar Lal Nebhani, i, Shyam Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil & Adv|ocate for the petitioners. with Mr. K. Shakeel, Advocate for the Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of India the respondent authorities to extend benefit (^nnexure P-1). petiticjners submits that this petition may be & directions given by this Court in W.P. ^cha Vs. Nagar Palik Nigam, Raipur) responjJent submits that he has no objection if feforesaid terms. ption is disposed of in terms of the order ii|) W.P. (c) No. 1118/2009 (Jagdeo Singh Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^