(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1936 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1936 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1936 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2005 K.G. Vora Securities Ltd. ...Applicant Versus Alpesh Mehta & Anr ...Respondents ..... Ms. Ruchita Dhuru, Advocate for Applicant Mr.S.A. Agarkar, Adv.for Respondent No.1. Mr. S.R.Shinde, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 18TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 18TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED: 18TH OCTOBER, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard both sides. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay. The learned advocate for the respondent i.e. original accused submitted that delay may not be condoned. However, in my view, sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay caused in filing Criminal Application, hence, delay is condoned. 3. Application is disposed of. *****