IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS FRIDAY, THE 29TH JANUARY 2010 / 9TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 1658 of 2010(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- LAILA, W/O.SHIHABUDEEN SHAMLA VIHAR, VILABHAGAM, VETTOOR P.O. BY ADV. SRI.P.A.AHAMMED RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE HOME SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANCHUTHENGU POLICE STATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. FIROSKHAN SHAL MUMTHAS HOUSE,NEAR MARKET VILABHAGAM, VETTOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. R1 & 2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SUKUMARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 1658 of 2010 F - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 29th day of January, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. The petitioner and her husband, along with their children, were in U.A.E. for the past 25 years. The petitioner's brother, who is also working in U.A.E., is residing in the adjoining property. The petitioner's son married the daughter of her brother. There were problems between the spouses. Thereafter the wife wanted a unilateral divorce and the petitioner's son is not willing for a divorce. 2. It is alleged that on 25.9.2009 the petitioner's sister-in-law and her sons came to the residence of the petitioner and took up quarrel with her and she was manhandled. She was admitted in the hospital. After the W.P.(C).No. 1658 of 2010 2 discharge, the petitioner filed Crime No. 97 of 2009 before the Anchuthengu Police station. It is stated that the petitioner's sister-in-law instigated her daughter to file a complaint before the second respondent, Crime No. 95 of 2009, in anticipation of the legal action based on Crime No.97 of 2009. Petitioner, her husband and daughter obtained anticipatory bail. A Crl.M.C. is also filed to quash the complaint. There is reference to the third respondent, who is second accused in a murder case. It is stated that the petitioner is being harassed. 3. We heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. 4. The learned Government Pleader would submit that with respect to Crime No. 97 of 2009 investigation is going on. Learned Government Pleader also submits that another person has also filed a complaint, but no crime has been registered and that it is necessary to continue the investigation in Crime W.P.(C).No. 1658 of 2010 3 No.95 of 2009. Learned Government Pleader submits that there will not be any harassment from the respondents. 5. We record the above submission of the learned Government Pleader and close this Writ Petition. (K. M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm