IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 23RD OCTOBER 2007 / 1ST KARTHIKA 1929 WA.No. 2525 of 2007 --------------------- ( AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.30049/2007 Dated 10/10/2007 ) APPELLANTS/ RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------------------- 1. INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, SQUAD NO.VI, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM. BY SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. SHRI VINOD CHANDRAN. RESPONDENT/ WRIT PETITIONER: ------------------------------------------------------ EMKE SILKS, T.B.ROAD, PALAKKAD REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER SRI.RINOOB B. BY THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.T.SANKARAN,J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.A. NO. 2525 OF 2007 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd October, 2007 JUDGMENT H.L.DATTU, C.J. An interim order passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) No.30049 of 2007, dated 10th October, 2007, is the subject matter of this Writ Appeal. 2. In our opinion, if for any reason, the appellants are aggrieved by the aforesaid interim order passed by this Court, they can, as well, make an appropriate application for modifying/vacating the interim order. Without even doing so, the appellants have rushed to this Court. 3. In our opinion, the appeal so filed by the appellants is premature. Therefore, we do not intend to entertain the appeal. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is rejected. However, liberty is reserved to the appellants, if they so desire, to make an appropriate application before the learned single Judge for modifying/ vacating the interim order granted. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) Chief Justice (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/