IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7343 of 2010 RINKI DEVI.W/O PRAMOD KUMAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. JAGDISH RAM 3. BINOD RAM ----------- 03/ 05.05.2010 Heard counsels for the petitioner, O.P. Nos. 2 and 3 as well as the State. This application is for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to O.P. Nos. 2 and 3 vide order dated 3.2.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46036 of 2008. The prayer for cancellation has been made on behalf of complainant on the ground that by suppressing material facts the opposite parties have fetched order in their favour granting anticipatory bail. The material facts, which is alleged to have been suppressed by the opposite parties relates to an order passed by the court of ACJM, Asansol, whereby bail has been granted to the opposite parties in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 116 of 2008. Since Asansol police had detained them on account of bailable warrant of arrest issued against the opposite parties. I find that there is no such Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 110 of 2008. In case Asansol police arrested the opposite parties in connection with such case and the bail was - 2 - granted to them in such a case, that is not going to affect the merit of Complaint Case No. 110 of 2008. In the facts and circumstances, I do not find that it can be a ground for cancellation of bail granted to the opposite parties. There is nothing to show that opposite parties have misused the privilege of bail allowed to them. Application is being dismissed having no merit. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)