IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 9TH APRIL 2010 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 3409 of 2010(A) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ DR.RAJITH. K.S, S/O.K.C. SUKUMARAN, KAUSTHUBHAM, K.S.H.B.COLONY, KALLEPULLY P.O., PALAKKAD DIST. BY ADV. MR.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, THRISSUR. 2. THE SECRETARY, COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, THRISSUR, (AS THE MANAGER OF COLLEGES UNDER THE COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, THRISSUR). 3. SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR THE POST OF LECTURER IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS HEAD OFFICE OF THE COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, THRISSUR. 4. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE DIST. 5. TOY. C.T., LECTURER IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION, ST.PETER'S COLLEGE, KOLENCHERRY, KOLENCHERRY P.O., ERNAKULAM DIST. R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP,SC,COCHIN D.B. R4 BY ADV. MR.P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/04/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 3409/2010-A APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATES OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE INTERVIEW MEMO DATED 11/12/2009. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.GA.II/E1/3265/95 DATED 11/11/1997. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12/07/2005 ISSUED BY UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 06/01/2010. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 08/01/2010. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT DATED 12/03/2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 3409 & I.A. No.4815 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 9th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T In I.A. No.4815/2010 the petitioner has prayed that the writ petition itself may be disposed of recording the fact that the petitioner has been appointed as per Ext.P7 order, without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioner. In the above circumstances the writ petition and the I.A. are disposed of recording the fact that the petitioner has been appointed by Ext.P7 order, without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioner. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/