CRM-M No. 2332 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M No. 2332 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.02.2011 Darshan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. KVS Ahluwalia, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana for the State. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). All the five accused are closely related with each other i.e. four are brothers and one is father. Learned counsel for the has petitioner vehemently argued that tendency of the people to implicate all the family members cannot be ruled out. He has further stated that no injury has been attributed to the petitioner. The role attributed to the petitioner is that he has given lalkara and he was also present at the spot. Contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner CRM-M No. 2332 of 2011 2 seem to have some substance at this stage. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of this case, it is directed that the petitioner be released on bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 17.02.2011 sk.