IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2009 / 12TH SRAVANA 1931 RP.No. 709 of 2009(I) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.22556/2008 Dated 06/04/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS IN WPC: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P.NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER IN WPC: ----------------------------------------------------------- K.SUNDER, GENERAL SECRETARY, KERALA INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL WELFARE RESEARCH AND TRAINING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PADMA NAGAR, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/08/2009 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V.GIRI, J ------------------- R.P.709/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2009 ORDER The only contention taken up in the Review petition is that the direction issued by this Court in the operative portion of the judgment should have related to the 1st respondent Government and not the 2nd respondent in as much as that the competent authority to take a decision in the matter of Anganwadi Training Centre is the Government and not the Director of Social Welfare. I heard learned counsel for the writ petitioner also in this regard. Review petition is disposed of clarifying that the operative directions issued in paragraph 15 of the judgment shall be related to the Government and not the Director of Social Welfare. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs