a IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR -) Writ Petition Ho.,3 06^2005 PETITIONER !/ yw> /r^y / JW/ 4W ^^?y ^'^y ^y ' ^" RESPONDENTS • Pachkaiid Eain Kiu-rani, S/ o Shri Thotha Rain Kurram, aged about. 27 years, Occupation- Assistant Teacher, R/ o ^ viUaee & Post Basta Nar, District- Baster, Jagdalpur (C.G.). / 3ST«^ i:3.V.); JS ^s^^' s^9i^. c^^ Stete ol Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Adiai Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas \/lbhag, Maatralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Shastri Chowk, Raipur (C.G.). The Director, Admi Jati Tatha. Anusuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, Raipur (C.G.j. The CoUector (Adtvashi Vikas Shakhaj, Jagdalpur (C.G.). The Assistant Director, Adiai Jati Tatha Aausuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, CoUectorate Buflduig, Jagdalpur (Baster) (C.G.). IT UNDER ARTICLE- 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIOW OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WEIT IN THE MATUEE_J3F MAJ'IDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIOSARI ETC.OR OTHER DIRECTION.Q!L^)RDER TO DO JUSTICE IN MATTER. XI-HC-78 ^Tyc|'<liqirt^,u>Tll'(1<l<S, [fi|rtl-<'iy'< \'^.^^0,3o6S/^vcT tTPTcSTWn^ •••••••••• ••••••••••••••y--"-^200 ^ST'racp (4ciij6i<g) 3n^n®ifeTpp awan^sTsiiwp s^nsR^rilgaiT^si asltu Shri Prashaat Jaiswal, S) counsel for the petitioner, Shri Bhaskar Pyas| State/respondents No. 1 to 4 Heard finaUy with fhe The petitioner who wa^ Jaapad Prathinik Shala Bade District- Bastar (C.G.) has Shala Haker, Vikas Khaud order has been issued by Chhattisgarh on 24.09.2004 (A|i Learaed counsel for ftie ofthe petitioner has been efFec) beeu inentioned in coluinn N4 dated 24.09.2004 (Aimexure-1 after passiag of such a long relieved froin preseut place of of postuig. He further subiaits Annexure-P/ l dated 24.09.: tUl date so far as petitioner'^ attention of this Court toward^ (he petition which speci&catly )r. Advocate with Shn Vinay Pandey, oja cottsent 20014 <pi<lfn<Ili iitni *ffei<SI '(ISl't-^K ^grf^HSII^T for fhe be^n Ko^Ubeda, t|he Alnn. Panel Lawyer advance copy. ofthe pardes. worku-ig as Assistant Teacher iii |Bode Nar, Vikas Khand Basta Nar, transferred to Purya Madhyamik il-Ubeda, D^trict- Kaixker (C.G.). This Dy. Secretary of fhe State of i|nnextu~e-P/4). Ipetitioner subinits fhat the transfer ted on admiaistrative grouud as has ^. 4 of the impugned tran.sfer order He further submits ttiat even jaeriod, the petitioner has not been ^ostiag for joiaing on fhe new place tthat this traasfer order contained in has not been cancefled or altered case is concemed. He draws fhe fhe avennents niade in Para- 5.5 of |states fhat "this transfer order of XI-HC-78 \sv»<^i^irto, uTil'd'io, ficii'dyt _,_ W?, ^ ^ <a, 30 6 S b-^DS *11*1rfl a?*n^ ••••••••••••••••••• •••"••y^200 SII^STVR ('j^fg^) an^sTq;! R-li* aaffairtCTgTqw ^-i^ ?TaTan^?T3n^?T -S- -I On the other haad, leartied counsel for fhe State subinits that he is not iu a positio|i to say anything regardiag fhe <!• cancellation or change etc. in relation to fhe iiupugned transfer order. In the facts aad eircui^staiices of the case, I am of the opinion that a conditioaal orde r caa be passed in this petition aad relieved within a period of 15 ^ inade clear that if fhe order Consequenfly, M.W.P. 'pi<l(n<i)l *iif«l'^''fe(<tl•(Ril'^K ^srf^Tan^CT fhe petition inay be disposed of|finaUy. It is hereby directed fh^t tf the order of traasfer of petitioner has not been caaceU^d or varied, fhe petitiouer shaU be lays froni the date of production of certified copy of this order before fhe concenied aiithority. It is of transfer has been caaceUed or changed or varied ia aay man^p.r by the concemed authority, fhis order passed by fbis Court sha? have no ef&cacy. With the aforesaid obsei|vations, the petition stands finally disposed of. No. 2564/2005, 5974/2005 & 5975/2005 also staitd disposed] of. Certified copy as perrule^. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge