.0o^ ^^ 2) The Ctae! Cos&ervatw of ^ (AdministTatitm) State of Cfihattisgarii, Raipur, ©istt.Raipur (C.G.j 31 ConseTvato.r of Forest, Forest ^- DepaTtment, Jagada^ur Circle, at Jaga.dalour, Distt. Bastar, C-.G, *» 4) . Dimsional Fprest Offieer (JOUKNAy, Forest; Divisioa Byapur, Distt. Dantewada, C.G, 5f Afena^ng BirectoT, Jila Vaoc5?a| SahlraiTUciofl Jagadalpyr, C-.G. '~tr XI-HC-22 *^ sn^T^r 'f^WSllt?! WRWHRd £'":;1 ^g -i||t||^q, ^ftWTS.Tqclwy 13.1M an^i'^<nw(ri??i +wfci4>;i ^wvW'? fe^t <r«i<r?R •^:'^3if;tn3fit?[ -'•^. snn visnnu i^osnta, co|jnsei ror tne peiitioner. Shri P.S. Koshy,,Dy. p,,G., and Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Dy. Go'/t. Aavocate, ror tne ^tate. Applusation ror ui-gent n sanng Isailowea. ne presem pennon r|as Deen fliea Dy tne petitioner praying tor quasning me suspenslon orpi^ order dated 27/10/2005 ("Annel r aatea Ta/a/^uus (Annex.P.i'3) ana aemotion ^.h'/S) issued by respondentno.3. i fcsrieT racts or me case ^re that tne petitioner was worKjng as Deputy Kanger ana was postea unaer the office QT Managing Director, Ziia vanop; SahRari union, Jasdalpur for c|?liection 6f sal beej in the year 2005. A show cause nouce was issuea to ti|ie pemioner. on //y/^uos for committing me iiiegaiities regaraing misuse of|runa. l ne petjtionersubmitted the reply on 13/9/2005. Thereaner, ihe 15/9/2005 and he was attach gemioner was suspenaed viae oraer daied sa in ine office of Divislonai Forest Officer, Bijapur. . uunng tne suspepsion . oraer, viae order dated 27,'10/2005 (Annex.i-'/s) tne petitionsr nas ipeen aemoied. Leamed counsel ror th'l demxitlon order dafed 27/1u/2((05, the discipilnary authority did'not issue a cnarge snset. counse! rurth^r suDmits that the petiiioner submitted ihe appiicanon to ms uonsen'ator enect matsinee 4eaays nave issuea, tnererore, nis suspen^ rUounsei aiso suDmits tnat ane )f Forest on 5/11 /2005 vide Annex.P/6 fo the ;ompieted and np charge sheet hasyet been icn orcfer .nas Deen automaticaiiy revok'ed. F receiVi'ng me saia appiication, the office of [^tRg^ XI-HC-22 •^af 'ttm'M, ^Awi^, T^dwy an^T^r. R-ii.+ sn^i i*i4i+ •gft?T -^. .a.^/oi 3Ti^[ ?s!rwgft?r ^.- responaent no;4 issued a cn^rge sneet aatea ^2/10,'^U05 wriicn nas &een received Dy tne petrtionsr on n is conienaea that m Havina considered the qTFfe^-tlTiTCff ^-fS^t-(&R3H .^3rf:w3nt?i 0/11fi petnio.ner prererrea an appeai (.Annex.i-'/isj on 20/1/2006 against tne or^ers daied 15/9/2005 and 27/10/2005, vyhich nas not yet Deen tieciaea-sof^r. . . facts and circumstances, v?ithQ.ut entering into the merits of.the case, in th4 opinion of this Court, ends ofjustice wi'il be sewea ir a direction is glv^ lAnnex.P/iS) preTerrea &y tni jn to the rsspondents to decide the appeai petitioner within a period of six we&ks from me'aate OT • proauction ot t))e copy OT inis ordsr OeTore triem, U tne grievance stii.i rernams, tne p^tmoner may avaii tnejemedy avaiiaDte at law. with the aforesaid ob.s^rvations, this petitionstands disposed of. i-enmea copy as per rt|ies. . Copy to ine State coun^ei tQr compljance. ' Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^^34.