FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 295 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s Memoranda of Coram, orders appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ------------------------------------------------------ Mr. A.B. Vagyani for petitioners. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE,J. 17/1/2008. P.C.: . Heard Mr. Vagyani the learned counsel for the petitioners. An application filed under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 has been allowed and as per the petitioners it is allowed ex parte. Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 provides for appeal against a order awarding compensation and, therefore, when a remedy of appeal is provided under the said Act, this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution cannot be entertained. . Hence, the petition is rejected as not maintainable and this order will not come in the way of the petitioners to file an appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)