1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4624/2010. Smt. Shashirani Gupta & anr. vs. Rent Tribunal & anr. Date : 12.5.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Manish Shishodia, for the petitioners. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioners are aggrieved against the order dated 10.4.2010 by which the Rent Tribunal denied the petitioners to file reply to the rejoinder filed by the applicant. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the applicant/landlord in rejoinder took new pleadings which are required to be answered by the petitioners/tenant. Learned counsel for the petitioners relied upon the judgment of this Court delivered in the case of Ramesh Kumar vs. Chandu Lal & Anr. reported in AIR 2009 Rajasthan 87. After going through the reasons given in the impugned order, this Court is satisfied that the Rent Tribunal rightly refused permission to file reply to the rejoinder as in the opinion of the Rent Tribunal, the relevant paras were not new 2 facts pleaded for the first time by the applicant in rejoinder and there is one legal plea also which needs hardly any reply. I do not find any illegality in the impugned order rather say the impugned order is legal and just. In view of the above, this writ petition, having no merits, is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya