IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9024 of 2011 ROHIT KUMAR, SON OF SRI TRIVENI TANTI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KALYANPUR, P.S. BARIARPUR, DISTRICT MUNGER-------------- PETITIONER Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.ARCHANA DEVI @ GURIYA W/O ROHIT KUMAR D/O SRI SUDHIR TANTI, RESIDING AT MOHALLA BARI ASHIKPUR, P.S. EAST COLONY, DISTRICT MUNGER-------------------------------------------------------OPP.PARTIES ----------- 2. 8.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner being husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A IPC and 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It appears that a divorce case was filed in 2007 whereas the present complaint was filed on 17.9.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that the petitioner will deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- in the Bank account of the complainant on supply her Bank account number to the petitioner within a period of four weeks. The aforesaid payment will be subject to any order to be passed in matrimonial or maintenance proceedings Considering the aforesaid stand, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) 2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Sadar, Munger, in connection with Complaint Case No. 866c of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.) Spal/