IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Transfer Application No. 313 of 2009 Date of decision : November 30, 2009 Seema Sharma and another ....Petitioners versus Deepak Sharma ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Vimal Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners Mr. Kapil Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Seema Sharma and her father Tilak Raj have filed this transfer petition under section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure for transfer of suit for mandatory injunction filed by Deepak Sharma pending in the Court of Ms. Harleen Kaur, Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kurukshetra to Yamuna Nagar. Transfer of suit is sought from Kurukshetra because the petitioners are residing at Yamuna Nagar and it would be inconvenient for petitioner no. 1 who is wife of respondent to travel to Kurukshetra on every date of hearing to attend the case. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. Respondent has filed the impugned suit vide plaint Annexure P/3 seeking mandatory injunction directing petitioner no. 1 to receive her Transfer Application No. 313 of 2009 -2- dowry articles/Ishtri Dhan lying with the plaintiff-respondent. Admittedly, the articles in question are lying at Kurukshetra in the matrimonial home of petitioner no. 1 where petitioner no. 1 and the respondent last reside together. Consequently, if the decree is passed, the dowry articles have to be taken by petitioner no. 1 at Kurukshetra from the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioners is also unable to tell as to why petitioner no. 1 is not ready to receive her dowry articles/Ishtri dhan. In view of the aforesaid, no ground for transfer of the suit from Kurukshetra to Yamuna Nagr is made out. Distance between Kurukshetra and Yamuna Nagar is about 50 kms only. The transfer petition is, accordingly, dismissed. ( L.N. Mittal ) November 30, 2009 Judge 'dalbir'