<s.1 ^. ^C^ [w, IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) N0. A'2-^-i- /2006 PETITIONER , ^y. ^Q^-^ ^tif" ^y^'" ^•^ /: Laxman Das Kanoujje aged about 40 years, Patwari, P.H.No. 34, S/o. Late Kejuram Kanoujje R/o Village Joratarai, Post Bhatagaon, P.H.No. 34, Tahsil Gunderdehi, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 'W ^'z-t RESPONDENTS /:1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :Secretary Department of revenue Mantralaya D.K.S., Bhawan , Raipur ,.-. .no?^ (C.G.) ,^2. The Tahsildar Tahsil Gunderdehi Distt. Durg (C.G.) -^. The Collector Durg Distt. Durg (C.G.) lid" WRIT PETITION U/A !6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 +11+1^11 sh+ltch s^'^rraT^pr, BiT(1y'is, fsiciitiy co.'p', <: ;-^....\..-.77.77.:.'.^ 200^ an^rtra^ (<^3^ET) 311^T W OFIW traT3TI^Tsbt|l»b ?TctTWHfer311^T 14-8-2006 Mr. D.N. PraJQpati, counsel for- the Detitioner. mother is suffering from tumor an^ tiiqTci'fl-i ^wvfi ^' fscS <Riwi< ^; Sirf^R'3T1^T Mrs. ^nju Ahuja, Deputy (povernment Advocate for the State/ respondents, on advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By the instant writ petition uffder- Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner hcs challen^ed his tr-ansfer order dated 25-7-2006 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondenf No.2, wher'eby the petitioner has been itransferred from Tehsil: 6underdehi to Tehsil: Daundi Lohara Main grievance of the petitiorfer is that he is working as Patwari. 1-iis after conducting operation 25 Kgs. of tumor was found and since then sh^ is re9ularly taking treatment. By the impugned order, the petitioner has b^en put to a disadvantageous position, as he cannot provide proper medical facijity to his mother. In the circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner mcy be allowed to mak^ a detailed representation to respondent No.l raising all his 9rievances and re^pondent No.l be directed to decide the same, to which leorned counsel oppe^ring for the State/respondents has no objection. Havin9 heard learned counsel fpr the parties, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and wi^hout expressing any opinion on the merits |of the case, the prayer made by learr^ed counsel for the petitioner is just, fair and reasonQble. Therefore, the p^titioner is allowed to make a detailed |representation annexing a copy of |l'his writ petition and its annexures to P.T.O. XI-HC-78 HI*1Mlib*Trai 3^' '<ii'4iw<<, ®Tn'y'i6,Ridwy .CO\T-, .^.s-1 - .•..T-.Tr..'-./.^ 200^" 3IT^?T 4a<»> (ytj,°t'^ET) 3n^,J«irf?:iw (raTsn^raiiiN; Soma ?T(ITWHf?(T3I1^T 2- respondent No.l within 10 days directed to decide the r'eoresenl days from the dote of its receipf the petitioner in an objective With the direction aforesdi Consequently, M.CV.5P-N0-^ Parties are entitled for from today and in turn, respondent No.l is (ation of the petitioner within a per-iod of 30 ', after considerin9 the objections raised by manher, in accordance with taw. id, the petition stands disposed of. 333/2006 also stands disposed of. ceiftified copy of this order, Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge °hi<itCT41-< >ii*iciT^fWt<.Riwi< ^isrf^R'an^T 'VQ tf Qo •^ P.T.O.