1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1716 OF 2009 Mrs.Vimal Virendra Singh .. Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr.Sandesh Patil for the applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2009. DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2009. DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2009. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.I-59 of 2009 of Kapurbawadi police station, Thane. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and three others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 498-A, 306, 304(b), 406 r/w 34 of IPC. 3. The applicant and three others have allegedly caused harassment to the deceased - Vinita with a view to coercing her and her family members to meet their unlawful demand of monies. The present applicant is a mother-in-law of the deceased. I have perused the FIR, lodged by the father of the deceased - Vinita. 2 2 2 From the FIR, it is clear that on 20th November, 2008 Vinita left her matrimonial home and started residing with her parents. She died on 21.2.2009. It is alleged that on 18.2.2009 the husband of Vinita, on telephone, had told her that he was not interested in her. According to the prosecution, that prompted Vinita to commit suicide. According to Mr.Patil, learned counsel for the applicant it was a railway accident. I do not wish to enter into that controversy at this stage. However, in my opinion, continuing detention of the applicant is not necessary. Hence I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. . The applicant be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount subject to the conditions that she shall report to the concerned police station as and when called. The application is disposed of. . While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)