In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Misc. No.M-2179 of 2010 ..... Date of decision:23.9.2010 Sapatter Singh .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....Respondent .... Present: Mr. S.K. Garg Narwana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pawan Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State. Mr. Gaurav Sethi, Advocate for the complainant. ..... S.S. Saron, J. For the reasons recorded in the connected petition i.e. Criminal Misc. No.M-340 of 2010 and the fact that the custody of the petitioner is not required in that case, learned counsel for the State, on instructions from Sub-Inspector Gurmit Singh, Police Station Sadar Ambala, has submitted that the custody of the petitioner is not required for the purposes of investigation because of the report of the Tehsildar (Sales) in response to the query of the Police which is to the effect that the properties No.3496 and 3497 situated at Katcha Bazar, Ambala Cantt. are not recorded in the name of C. Lal C/o Sapatter Singh. Keeping in view the order passed in the connected case, interim bail granted on 25.1.2010 is made absolute. The criminal miscellaneous petition stands disposed of. September 23, 2010. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp*