^ HIGH COURTGF^CHHATT!SGARH_AT.B£ySSPyB IVSISCELLANEQUS APPEALNO., 746'OF 2004 APPELLANT : M/s Modi Cement Company Ltd., (Now M/s Ambuja Cement Eastsm Ltd,), Through P. Bhaskara Rao, Advisor (Comm), Modigram (Rawan), Baioda Bazar, District Raipur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENT : Union of india. Through Generai Manager, South Eastern Railway (Now South East Central Raiiway), Bilaspur APPEALUNDERSECTiON230F:THE8AIUWAYCLA|MS TRSBUNALACT.1987 (SInaie Bench: Hon'bSe IVIr. N.K. Aaarwal. J.) Present : Shri Ashish Shrivastava, counsei for the appeiiant. Shri Amit Choudhary, counsei with Vs. Naushina Ail, counsei for the respondent. QRAL ORDER (Passed on 20th day of April, 2010) Shrl Amit Choudhary along with Ms. Naushina Aii, feamed counsel for the respondent referring to sub-section (1) of Sectlon 23 of the Rallways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, have raised a pretiminary objection about the maintainabiiity of the present appeal before the High Court of Chhattisgarh as the impugned judgment has been passed by Bhopai Bench of Railways Claims Tribunai, which is iocated withln the territorial jurisdiction of Madhya Pradesh High Court. 2. Shri Ashish Shrivastava, iearned counsei fbr the appeilant, in view of the preliminary objectlon, seeks permisslon to wlthdraw the appeal with the liberty of filing another appeai before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. 3. Permission granted. 4. With the above llberty, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The Registry is dlrected to return the certified copy of the impugned judgment to iearned counsel for the appeiiant jmmedlateiy. !11~~ Kvr Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge