-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.78l5 of 2004 Manisha Sadashiv Dhale..Petitioner vs The State of Mah and ors..Respondents Mr.K.R.Dhanuka and M B Jadhav for petitioner Mr P I Khemani AGP for State Mr Lokesh with Mr G S Hegde for respondent no.2 Mr. R.V.Bansode for respondent no.3 CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.C DHARMADHIKARI JJ. CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.C DHARMADHIKARI JJ. CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.C DHARMADHIKARI JJ. Dated 26.l0.2004 Dated 26.l0.2004 Dated 26.l0.2004 P.C: l. Heard advocates. Perused affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no. 2. We do not find any reason to interfere with the allotment of STD booth to respondent no. 3 who is also a disabled person having 60% disability. Moreso when it is brought to our notice that the petitioner is already running STD booth near about the ST stand. Hence petition stands dismissed. 2. Mr Hegde for the State Transport Corporation stated that the Corporation will abide by the percentage of the disability as fixed in the -2- Disabilities Act i.e. 40% for the purpose of reservation in employment as well as granting permission for running STD booths and other amenities.