CR No. 1488 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 1488 of 2010 Date of decision:- 25.10.2010 Sharwan Kumar and others ......petitioners vs. Roop Chand and another ......respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. R.K.Lamba, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate for respondents. HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) Defendants are in revision petition aggrieved against the order passed by learned trial Court on 29.1.2010, whereby an application for stay of the suit for permanent injunction filed by plaintiff-respondents was dismissed in view of an earlier suit filed by the petitioners. In the present suit for injunction, the plaintiffs have claimed possession of Khasra No. 15 whereas defendants No. 2 has filed earlier suit for permanent injunction inter alia in respect of possession of Khasra No. 6. It is not disputed that Khasra No. 6 and 15 are adjoining to each other. Though, in both the suits, the land and the parties are not identical but the dispute amongst the parties revolve around demarcation of Khasra No. 6 and 15 which is subject matter of both the suits. In view of the said fact, though I do not find any ground to stay the suit filed by respondents herein, subsequently, but keeping in view the CR No. 1488 of 2010 -2- identity of subject matter of the property, it will be appropriate if both the suits are heard and decided together so as to avoid contradictory judgments in respect of the property which is the subject matter of both the suits. Consequently, both the suits No. 442 dated 4.9.2009 titled as Roop Chand and another vs. Sharwan Kumar and others and 330 of 20.7.2009 titled as Lakhi Singh vs.Roop Chand and others pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge, Sr. Division Hathin are directed to be heard and decided by the same Court together. Revision petition stands disposed of in the above terms. . (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 25.10.2010 preeti