In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Misc. No.M-4130 of 2010 ..... Date of decision:11.2.2010 Neenu and another .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab .....Respondent .... Present: Mr. A.K. Walia, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... S.S. Saron, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Petitioner No.2-Gollu is attributed a Kirpan blow on the head of the complainant-Narender Kaur. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the injury is simple in nature. After giving my thoughtful consideration to the matter, it may be noticed that the petitioners along with 8-9 other boys on 23.12.2009 came on motorcycles armed with Kirpans and iron rods. They parked their motorcycles near the gate of the house of the complainant. All of them trespassed into the house and threatened that the house of Laden, who is the brother of the complainant and undergoing imprisonment, be set on fire and the entire family should be done to death. The complainant told them that her brother Laden was already serving his sentence in jail. Gollu (petitioner No.2) then gave a Kirpan blow which hit the complainant on her head. Thereafter, the other accused including the petitioners broke the colour TV, Cr. Misc. No.M-4130 of 2010 [2] TV trolley, motorcycle and various other articles lying in the house. They gave iron rods blows on the door of the kitchen. On this account the complainant suffered a loss of Rs.70,000/- to Rs.80,000/-. On hearing their noise, the neighbours of the complainant, namely, Jasbir Kaur, Nachhatar Singh Sahni and father of the complainant, namely, Gurdip Singh reached at the spot. On seeing them, the petitioners and others ran away with their weapons on the motorcycles. In the circumstances, even though injury on the person attributed to Gollu (petitioner No.2) is stated to be simple, it may be noticed that coming into the house of the complainant and smashing articles with iron rods it is not a conduct which would warrant grant of concession of pre-arrest bail. The criminal miscellaneous petition is accordingly dismissed. In case the petitioners surrender within two days from the receipt of certified copy of this order, their application for regular bail shall be considered expeditiously by the trial Court and preferably within one day after the period of Police remand, if any. February 11, 2010. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp*