I ( $-54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF + BAIL APPLN. 1640120II MOIID AFZAL Through: STATE DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Petitioner Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Vishal Sehijpal, Advocates ..... Respondent Ms. Jasbir Kaur. APP for State Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA ORDER 'h 21.11.2011, Crl. MA 1814612011 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. I.640/2011 This is an application under Section 439 CrPC read with Section 2l(4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crimes Act (N{CQCA) prefened by the petitioner for grant of interim bail for a period of two months. The petitioner herein is charged for committing offences under Section 3(2) & 3(a) of MCOCA vide FIR ){o.18/2009. The allegations against the petitioner are that he committed unlawful activities being a member of organized syndicate crime with the object of giving threats and that he was found in unlawful possession of arms. The petitioner seeks interim bail for a period of two months on account of sickness of his wife since 2.10.2011 and under treatment in the mental hospital since 22.10.201 1. I have perused the impugned order dated 15.1 1.201 1 passed by learned ASJ wherein an application seeking the same relief on the same grounds was dismissed vide detailed order. It has been pointed out in the said order that the petitioner is involved in as many as 19 cases of cognizable nature. A detention order under NSA was also passed against the petitioner for a period ofone year. The petitioner earlier tried to procure bail by forging the report of a Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified tl t: Mohan Medical Centre and on being confronted with the same, withdrew the application. The wife of the petitioner was provisignally diagnosed as a case of psychotropic disorder and was hospitalized for a period of two weeks from the date of her admission and thereafter her condition was to. be reviewed. Be that as it may, there are other family members of the petitioner as well as his wife who can take care of her initial heatment in the hospital. Keeping in mind the gravity of the offences in which the petitioner has been charged and the large number of cases pending against him, I do not deem it fit to release the petitioner on bail. The bail application is hereby dismissed. fu, M.L. MEHTA,J NOVEMBER 21,2011 rd a