Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010020172019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil) 394/2019 1:M/S FRIENDS VENEER PVT. LTD. AND 4 ORS. A COMPANY UNDER THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS H.O. AT D.M. LOHIA ROAD, TINSUKIA- 786125 2: SHRI HEMPRAKAS SHARMA S/O- LATE GAURI DUTTA SHARMA 3: SMTI. MANJU DEVI SHARMA W/O- LATE JAGADISH PRASAD SHARMA 4: SHRI AVIN SHARMA S/O- LATE JAGADISH PRASAD SHARMA 5: SRI SHANTANU SHARMA S/O- LATE JAGADISH PRASAD SHARMA ALL ARE RESIDENT OF TINGRAI HOOGRIJAN ROAD ( NAU PHUKHUIR ROAD) TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN- 78612 VERSUS 1:DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA, HUDCO BUILDING, 15N, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, NEW MARKET COMPLEX, PHARSE-1, 4TH FLOOR, KOLKATA- 700087 2:UNION BANK OF INDIA A BODY CORPORATE CONSTITUTED UNDER THE BANKING COMPANIES (ACQUISITION AND TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKING) ACT 1970 HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT 239 BIDHANSABHA MARG MUMBAI AND BRANCH OFFICE AT TINSUKIA ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 PIN- 78612 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S S ROY Advocate for the Respondent : Linked Case : WP(C) 5035/2004 1:M/S FRIENDS VENEER PVT. LTD. VERSUS 1:DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL and ORS Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.K K BHATRA Advocate for the Respondent : BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER Date : 26-04-2019 Heard Shri S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner, who by referring to the affidavit filed today, submits that the respondent No. 2 has been served by dasti. The learned counsel also refers to the order dated 11.04.2019, whereby, it was observed that the prayer for stay would be considered on appearance of the respondent No. 2. Seen the affidavit filed with regard to dasti service upon the respondent No. 2. The service upon the respondent No. 2 is complete. Page No.# 3/3 List this case on 03.05.2019 to enable the respondent No. 2 to appear in this case. Since the interim prayer was to be considered on appearance of the respondent No. 2, has not been done as the respondent No. 2 is yet to enter appearance, it is made clear that any action taken by the DRT would be subject to further orders that may be passed in this proceeding. JUDGE Comparing Assistant