IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24358 of 2009 SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL YADAV . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 4. 11.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, for the State and for the informant who has appeared suo motu. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a Police case under Sections 363, 364 and 34 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel submits that he is not one of the three named accused in the F.I.R. His name has transpired during investigation at the stage of supervision only because of a pre-existing dispute between him and the alleged victim with regard to the appointment on the post of Shiksha Mitra. Learned counsel for the informant opposed the application that the petitioner was absconding and the victim was still traceless. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail during investigation till submission of charge sheet only on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Karpi (Shahar Telpa O.P.) P.S. Case No. 52/2007, subject to the conditions 2 laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. If he does not make himself available to the investigating officer for investigation the latter shall be at liberty to move appropriately before the Court below for facilitating the investigation. In the event that charge sheet is filed, the petitioner shall seek his remedy before the Court below first. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)