IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1507 of 2010 In CWJC No. 4905 of 2010 With I.A. No. 8481 of 2010 And I.A. No. 8482 of 2010. =================================================== 1. The Union of India through Director General, Central Reserve Police Force, Block No. 1, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003, 2. Deputy Inspector General of Police (Operation), Central Reserve Police Force, Dantewara, Chhatisgarh, 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police (Adm), Bihar Sector, Central Reserve Police Force, Patna, 4. Deputy Inspector General of Police (Adm), Central Reserve Police Force, Pampur (UP), 5. Deputy Inspector General (CR and Vigilance), CRPF, Block no.1, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi …Respondents-Appellants Versus Prabhanjan Kumar, son of late Rajendra Prasad, R/o Baldeo Bhawan, Chitkohra Bazar, P.S. Gardanibagh, District – Patna … Writ petitioner …………………………………………………………….. Respondent =================================================== APPEARANCE For the appellants: Mr. Raghib Ahassan, Sr.Advocate & Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Devendra Kr. Sinha, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Abhinay Raj and Mr. Biresh Kumar Sinha, Advocates. =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 3. 26.10.2010. Re. I.A. No. 8481 of 2010. This application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is made by the appellants - Union of India & others for condonation of delay of 43 days occurred in filing the Letters Patent Appeal. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the delay is condoned. Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. Re. LPA No. 1507 of 2010. This Appeal preferred under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent by the Union of India and others arises from the judgment and order dated 10.05.2010 passed by the learned single Judge in the above CWJC No. 4905 of 2010. The learned single Judge has held that the continued suspension of the writ petitioner after 25.02.2010 (after expiry of 90 days from the effective date of suspension) was violative of sub-rules (6) & (7) of Rule 10 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 as the appellant - Union of India failed to extend the period of suspension after review before the expiry of 90 days from the effective date of suspension. We agree with the reasoning of the learned single Judge. No case for interference is made out. The Appeal is dismissed in limine. I.A. No. 8482 of 2010 stands disposed of. Dilip ( R.M. Doshit, CJ ) ( Jyoti Saran, J )