IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 9945 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : 09.07.2009 Ved Parkash Bali .... PETITIONER Versus State of Punjab and another ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Rajinder Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) The petitioner retired as Secretary, Market Committee, Banga, on 30.6.2005, on attaining the age of superannuation. After his retirement, he filed CWP No. 12610 of 2006 for releasing the retiral benefits. This Court, vide order dated 11.8.2006, directed the respondents to decide the legal notice sent by the petitioner. Consequently, the respondents, vide different cheques, as mentioned in the impugned orders, released all the retiral benefits in the months of July and August, 2006. After the release of all the retiral benefits, the petitioner again filed CWP No. 16779 of 2008 in this Court for issuing direction for payment of interest on the delayed payment of retiral benefits. The said writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 22.9.2008, with a direction to the respondents to decide the CWP No. 9945 of 2009 -2- representation made by the petitioner regarding interest. Vide the impugned order dated 16.2.2009 (Annexure P-7), respondent No.2, by passing a detailed order, has rejected the said claim of the petitioner on the ground that the retiral benefits were released to the petitioner without any delay on the part of the respondents. In the impugned order, each and every step taken by the respondents for immediate release of the retiral benefits to the petitioner has been mentioned. After hearing counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order. Dismissed. July 09, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE