1 cam12710 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 127 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 65 OF 2007 Peter Lawrance Lobo ...Appellant/Ori. Petitioner VERSUS Elizabeth Peter Lobo ...Respondent Mr. Ricat Chand i/by Mr. Rajesh Sawant for the Appellant/Ori. Petitioner Mr. Soal Sankar Sinha i/by Mr. D.A. Athavale for the Respondent. CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATE: 16TH DECEMBER, 2010 P.C.:- We see no reason to depart from the arrangement already observed in order dated 9th April, 2010. We, however, accept the grievance of the counsel for the applicant-respondent that what is pending before the lower Court between the parties is not criminal appeal but criminal proceedings. Nevertheless, the appeal can wait till the said proceedings are concluded. The counsel for the applicant relies 2 cam12710 on the decision of the Apex Court to contend that both the proceedings are mutually exclusive. Even so, the appeal can proceed after the decision in criminal proceedings is rendered and without being influenced by the opinion in the said proceedings. Those are matters which can be considered at the appropriate stage. Ordered accordingly. Application disposed of. SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA,J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.