HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 20th June, 2011 1st Bail Application No. 410 of 2011 Order on the bail application of the accused. Mehatabuddin @ Mehtab S/o Ferojuddin ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In Case Crime No. 4 of 2011 U/s 395, 342, 420, 170, 412, 504 and 506 I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali Manglore District Haridwar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Tapan Singh, the learned counsel on behalf of Mr. Sanjeev Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. T.C. Aggarwal, Addl. G.A. for the State. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record. The learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not wish to file the rejoinder affidavit. The co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by the orders dated 15th March, 2011 in 1st Bail Application No. 200 of 2011, Nadeem Vs. State of Uttarakhand and 20th April, 2011 in 1st Bail Application No.287 of 2011, Tamkeen Vs. State of Uttarakhand. In the light of the aforesaid, the applicant having a similar role is also entitled to be enlarged on bail. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 4 of 2011, U/s 395, 342, 420, 170, 412, 504 and 506 I.P.C., on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 20.06.2011 Shiv 2