IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.499 of 2010 Between: The Land Acquisition Officer cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapuram. … Petitioner And Gandeti Nagaratnam. … Respondent This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 499 OF 2010 ORDER:- It is not disputed that against the order passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Pithapuram passed in O.P.No.72 of 1992, petitioner preferred A.S.No.1916 of 1994, which was dismissed on 15.06.2004 confirming the decree and order passed by the trial Court. The decree of the trial Court merges with the decree passed in the appeal. Once the decree passed by the trial court is merged with the decree of the appellate court, the impugned I.A.No.1129 of 2008 filed for amendment of the decree by the trial court, does not arise. It is only the appellate court and not the trial court which can rectify the mistake, as held by this Court in Venkayya v. Satyanarayana {AIR 1959 AP 360} When the same was brought to the notice of the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is now represented that an application to amend the decree and judgment has been filed in A.S.No.1916 of 1994. In view of the same, no cause survives in the revision and accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed. No costs. __________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J 23rd April 2010 Lmv