IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1543 of 2007 (S/S) Smt. Sita Arya W/o Shri Rajender Lal, R/o Village Gadoli, Post Office – Gairsain District Chamoli. ………. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary Education, Civil Secretariat, Dehradun. 2. Director Vidhyalaya Shiksha Civil Secretariat, Dehradun. 3. District Education Officer (Basic) District Chamoli. 4. Deputy Block Education Officer, Gairsain, District Chamoli. ……………. Respondents Ms. Prabha Noliyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the respondents. Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2) By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought following reliefs: (a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing and setting aside the order dated 01.08.2007, passed by District Education Officer, Chamoli. (b) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 3 to give the joining to the petitioner by virtue of Government Order No. 238/XXIV (3) /2004 dated 01.12.2004, passed by respondent No. 2 to Primary School Dhanga, Jingaurpur, Sumerpur via Gairsain. (c) To pass any other and further orders, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. (d) Award the cost of the petition to the petitioner. 3) Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a Head Mistress in a primary school. It appears that she is posted in Primary School Andrapa, Gairsain. Annexure -11 to the writ petition shows that vide order dated 06.09.2006, on the request of petitioner, she was attached with Primary School, Pharson (Gairsain). When the order was passed canceling the attachment, she filed earlier a Writ Petition No. 886 (S/S) of 2007. Said writ petition appears to have been decided on 13.07.2007. In compliance of said order, the respondent No. 3 passed following orders: ^^oknh }kjk mDr fjV ;kfpdk ds }kjk ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; uSuhrky esa okn nk;j fd;k x;kA oknh izkFkfed fo|ky; vkUnzik xSjlSa.k dh iz/kkuk/;kfidk gSA oknh dh izkFkZuk ij mUgsa izkFkfed fo|ky; Qjlksa xSjlSa.k es lEc) fd;k x;k FkkA pwfd ;g fo|ky; loZ f’k{kk vfHk;ku ds vUrxZr l`ftr gqvk gS vkSj bl fo|ky; ds fy, iz0v0 dk in Lohd`r ugh gS] Qyr% lEc)rk vof/k esa oknh dk osru izkFkfed fo|ky; vkUnzik ls vkgfjr gksrk gSA foHkkxh; funsZ’kksa ds vuqlkj lEc)rk lekIr djus ds Qyr% oknh dks muds ewy fo|ky; izkFkfed fo|ky; vkUnzik xSjlSa.k esa okilh ds vkns’k fd;s x;s gSaA izkFkfed fo|ky; vkUnzik esa oknh ds vfrfjDr dksbZ Hkh iz/kkuk/;kfidk dk;Zjr ugha gSA oknh ds ifr }kjk ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; uSuhrky ds mfYyf[kr vkns’k ds mijkUr oknh dks izk0 fo0 Qjlksa] izk0 fo0 xSjlSa.k] d0tw0gk0 xkaoyh] d0tw0 gk0 lfy;k.kk esa inLFkkiu djus gsrq izkFkZuk i= fn;k x;k gSA izk0fo0 Qjlksa xSjlSa.k esa iz0v0 dk in l`ftr ugha gS izk0fo0 xSjlSa.k esa iz0v0 dk in fjDr ugha gS vkSj fu;ekuqlkj iz0v0 izk0fo0 dks tw0gk0@d0tw0gk0 esa inLFkkiu fd;s tkus dk izkfo/kku ugha gSA** From the above order, it is clear that now the petitioner has no case as of right in respect of relief claimed, by her. 6) The writ petition is devoid of merits, and the same is dismissed in limine. (Interim relief application also stands dismissed, accordingly). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt. October 12, 2007. H.Negi