IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE Mr. DEVINDER GUPTA, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE: G. ROHINI WRIT APPEAL No. 928 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order in WPMP.No. 26477/03 in W.P.NO. 21206 of 2003 dated 20-2-2004 on the file of the High Court). Between: M/s Venkateswar Enclave Residents Welfare Association, Regd. No. 3537/98, rep by its Working President and Treasurer K. Damodhar Reddy, R/o H. No. 6-5/1, in Plot No.98, Jeedimetla Post, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distict Appellants/Petitioner AND 1. State of A.P rep by Prl. Secretary to the Government, Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad 2. The Director of Town & Country Planning, B.R.K.R. Building, Tank Bund, Hyderabad 3. The Vice Chairman, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Paigah Place, Rasoolpura, Hyderabad 4. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakadikapool, Hyderabad 5. The Revenue divisional Officer, Hyderabad East Division, Malakuntta Road, Ranga Reddy District 6. The Commissioner, Qutbullapur Municipality, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 7. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 8. The Station House Officer, Petbasheerabad Police Station, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Respondents/Respondents COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT : MR. G. Hanumantha Rao COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT No.3 : B.Viswanatha Reddy COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT Nos, 1,2,4 5,,7,& 8: G.P. for Municipal Admn The Court delivered the following ORDER: Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the learned single judge had modified the order to the detriment of the appellant and permitted the respondent to carry on the construction. Contd..P.2 ..2.. Prima facie, there is nothing on record which would permit the respondent to carry on construction. Learned Single judge simply recorded a representation which was made before him by the learned counsel for the respondent and directed that status-quo granted on 26-9- 2003 to be continued as regards the remaining park area. Since there is no objection as regards the stage of the construction raised in part of the park area, we require the counsel for the parties to place on record the photographs of the construction standing in the park as well as of the remaining vacant area to be filed within a week. List after one week. Sd/-- K. VIVEKANAND ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Prl. Secretary to the Govt., Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad 2. The Director of Town & Country Planning, B.R.K.R. Bulging, Tank Bund, Hyderabad 3. The Vice Chairman, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Paigah Palace, Rasoolpura, Hyderabad 4. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakadikapool, Hyderabad 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad East Division, Malakuntta Road, Ranga Reddy District 6. The Commissioner, Qutbullapur Municipality,Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 7. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 8. The Station House Officer, Petbasheerabad Police Station, Qutbullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ( 1 to 8 BY RPAD) 9. Two CC’s to G.P for Municipal Administration, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 10. One Spare Copy Skm HIGH COURT HCJ & RGJ DATE: 24-6-2004 NOTE: LIST AFTER ONE WEEK ORDER W.A. NO. 928/2004 SKM DRAFTED ON: 26-06-2004 HIGH COURT HCJ & RGJ DATE: 24-6-2004 NOTE: LIST AFTER ONE WEEK ORDER W.A. NO. 928/2004 HIGH COURT HCJ &’ RGJ DATED: 2-4-2004 NOTE: LIST AFTER TWO WEEKS ORDER W.A.NO. 573 OF 2004 DIRECTION