IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:- 31.01.2007 Coram:- The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.SATHASIVAM and The Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR Writ Appeal No.2281 of 2002 Erode Periyar Nagar Kudiyiruppore Nalam Nadum Sangam, (Reg.No.74/79) rep. by its President, No.L-312, 4th Main Road, Periyar Nagar, Erode-638 001. ... Appellant /Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Housing Board, through its Chairman, Madras-600 035. 2.The Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Periyar Nagar, Erode-638 009. ... Respondents/Respondents Writ appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 13.02.2002 made in W.P.No.6974 of 1995. WP NO. 6974/95: Petition presentead under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of mandamus from in any manner enforcing the demand for any enhanced payment in excess of the cost of house/flat stipulated in the firm allotment order of the second respondent published in Dinamalar dated 16.12.94 and as was originallly fixed by the respondents at the time of allotment of each house/flat to the members and in any manner enforcing the demand for arbitrary increase of costs of land as well as the house/flat for the issuance of the sale deeds to the members of the petitioner- association. For Appellant : Mr.S.Silambanan For respondents : Mr.S.Kasikumar for Mr.K.Chelladurai https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by P.SATHASIVAM, J.) The above writ appeal is directed against the order dated 13.02.2002 made in W.P.No.6974 of 1995, in and by which, the learned single Judge, after finding that there are no merits in the claim of the petitioner-Sangam, has dismissed their writ petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the respondents. 3. In view of the order to be passed hereunder, we are of the view that it is unnecessary to refer all the factual details as stated by both parties. 4. However, it is suffice to dispose of the appeal with the following directions. (i) It is open to the individual members of the petitioner-Sangam to make a demand with the Housing Board to furnish details, based on which the cost has been enhanced. (ii) If any such demand is made, the Housing Board, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of such demand, shall furnish all the details/basis on which the cost has been enhanced. (iii) It would be open to the individual members of the petitioner-Sangam to avail such remedy as is open to them in law. 5. The order of the learned single Judge dated 13.02.2002 made in W.P.N0.6974 of 1995 is modified to the above extent and the writ appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs. raa Sd/ Asst. Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Madras-600 035. 2.The Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Periyar Nagar, Erode-638 009. 1 CC TO MR.K. CHELLADURAI, ADVOCATE SR 5483 1 CC TO MR.S. SILAMBANAN, ADVOCVATE SR 5404 W.A.No.2281 of 2002 31.01.2007 BV(CO) BP/7.2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/