THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY TRANSFER CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.586 of 2009 ORDER: The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent took place on 16.05.2004. The respondent filed O.P.No.17 of 2008 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar, for divorce against the petitioner. This Tr.C.M.P. is filed with a prayer to transfer O.P.No.17 of 2008 from the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar, to the Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar. The petitioner contends that she has already filed M.C.No.78 of 2009 in the Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar and that it would be difficult for her to travel all the way to Mahabubnagar to defend herself in the case. She also contends that the respondent is threatening her when she attended the Court. The respondent filed a counter-affidavit denying the allegations. It is stated that he is visually handicapped and that on account of harassment caused to him by the petitionerm he had filed O.P. for divorce. He states that he is not aware of filing of M.C. by the petitioner. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. Normally this Court would lean in favour of transferring the matrimonial matters of a Court which suits the convenience of the woman spouse. In the instant case, the respondent is a visually handicapped person and it would be difficult for him even to move out, not to speak of, travelling long distances frequently for attending the Court. Though the petitioner may be undergoing some difficulty in travelling, but her allegation that the respondent is threatening her cannot be believed. The hardship caused to the petitioner can be compensated directing the respondent to pay Rs.300/- to the petitioner on every appearance in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar. Accordingly, the Tr.C.M.P. is dismissed, however, directing that the respondent shall be under obligation to pay Rs.300/- to the petitioner on every date of hearing when she attends the Court. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J 14th June, 2010 GHN