llNNNt HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J.& HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, J. Writ Appeal No. 437 of 2011 Appellant : Smt. Yashoda Mehar, aged about 51 Petitioner years, wife of Shri Dr. Ashok Kumar Mehar, presently working as M.P.W. (Female) at Govt. City Dispensary, Jut-Mill, Raigarh, resident at Kelo Vihar, Raigarh, Tahsil and district Raigarh C.G. VERSUS Respondents 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of General Administration, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. The Secretary, Department of hlealth and Family Welfare, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur C.G. 3. The Collector, district Raigarh C.G. 4. The Chief Medical and Health Officer, Raigarh, district Raigarh C.G. Writ appeal under Section 2 (1) ofthe Chhattisaarh Hiah Courts (Appeal to Division Benchl Act, 2006 Present: Shri Roop Naik, counsel for the appellant. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Additional Advocate General for the State / respondents. JUDGMENT ^th (12tnSeptember,2011) //^'. W.A.No.437 of 2011 ^ ; The following judgment of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Learned counsel for the parties are heard on admission. 2) AppellanV petitioner Smt. Yashoda Mehar has filed this intra Court appeal against the impugned order dated 25.08.2011, passed in WP(S) No.4836/2011, whereby the learned Single Judge has declined to interfere in the matter of petitioner's transfer. 3) The petitioner who was posted as M.P.W.(Female) at City Dispensary, Jutemill Raigarh has been transferred vide order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P/1) to Sub Health Centre, Bahirkela, Gharghoda in the district of Raigarh. 4) The learned Single Judge on a thorough consideration of the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner did not find any illegality or infirmity in the orcler of the petitioner's transfer and therefore, declined to interfere in the matter. 5) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, we do not find any infirmity either in the order of the learned Single Judge declining to interfere in the matter or in the order of petitioner's transfer from Raigarh to Bahirkela, Gharghoda in the same district, which may warrant interference in this intra Court appeal. 6) The Writ Appeal, therefore, fails and is hereby dismissed summarily. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- N.K-Agarwal Judge subbu