IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45788 of 2009 MD. TAWARAK Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 27.01.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner renews his prayer for bail in a Police case under Sections 302 and other provisions of the Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act, as also Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. It is submitted that firing is attributed to co-accused Ram Ayodhya Ram. The petitioner is in custody since 6.10.2008. Considering the undertaking given on behalf of the petitioner to be physically present in the court on each date fixed in the trial till conclusion of the same let the petitioner be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 40,000/- (Forty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in Sessions Trial No. 510 of 2009 arising out of Sahebganj PS Case No. 154 of 2008. Both the sureties must be his father and mother respectively. Their photographs and proof of residence shall be appended to the bail bonds. If the absence of the petitioner on any date fixed in the trial is not to the satisfaction of the court below it shall be at liberty to deal with him appropriately notwithstanding the present order. This shall be without prejudice to the rights of the courts, if circumstances warrant, to deal appropriately with the sureties also. Snkumar (Navin Sinha,J.)