1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Letters Patent Appeal No. 367/2008 in Writ Petition No. 3459/2008 Rajesh Dattaappa Dalal vs. Shri Vitthal Rukhamai Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha, Dongaon and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.T.Harkare, Advocate for the appellant Coram : A.P. Lavande & Prasanna B. Varale, JJ Dated : 11.2. 2009. By this appeal, the appellant takes exception to the order dated 13.10.2008 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 3459/08 preferred against the order passed by the School Tribunal, Amravati refusing to condone delay of about 25 months. 2. The order terminating the appellant was passed on 14.11.2005 and the appeal came to be filed on 28.1.2008 i.e. almost after a period of 25 months in which the ground urged in support of the condonation of delay was that the appellant was wrongly advised. The learned Single Judge in the impugned order has stated that the ground urged was vague inasmuch as neither the person who gave advise nor what was the advise 2 rendered was disclosed in the application. The learned Single Judge consequently dismissed the writ petition. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and having perused the record we find no perversity in the order passed by the learned Single Judge. The impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge can neither be said to be illegal or without jurisdiction nor has been passed in illegal exercise of jurisdiction. Therefore, no case is made out for interference. The appeal is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE patle.