IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29951 of 2010 1. HRIDAY NATH PRASAD, S/O LATE BIPIN BIHARI PRASAD, 2. VED PRAKASH, 3. SRI PRAKASH, BOTH SONS OF SRIDAY NATH PRASAD. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 01.10.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner’s brother Kedar Nath Prasad is really behind filing of the case, who got filed this case through his lawyer but has committed some mistake. Petitioners were aggrieved by him and went there in his search. There was no occasion to give abuse or assault to the informant. Theft is ornamental that is of informant’s blanket and abuse if is given either inside or out side of the mill or at gate. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Nava Nagar P.S. Case No.24 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Bhardwaj ( Mandhata Singh, J.)