IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM NO. M-2119 OF 2011 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 03.03.2011 Baldev Singh ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. Ramandeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Bhinder, Senior Additional A.G. With Mr. Amandeep Singh Rai, AAG, Punjab. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel has appeared on behalf of respondent-State. As per allegations of the prosecution, the petitioner along with others committed dacoity. Two mobile phones were also recovered from the petitioner. The gravity of offence does not make out a case for grant of regular bail. So far as the case of accused Sukhjit Singh is concerned, there is no recovery from the said accused. The case of petitioner is distinguishable from that of Sukhjit Singh. So, no ground for grant of regular bail is made out. Dismissed. MARCH 03, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE