IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4192 of 2009 SHRI RAJAN, son of Piyary, resident of Mangal Talab Ambedkar Colony, P S – Khajekellan, District – Patna. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Mr. Afjal Imam Abdullah, Secretary, Urban Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. Mr. K Santhil Kumar, Commissioner cum Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Budh Marg, Patna. 4. Mr. Braham Ram Executive Officer, City Circle, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Bindeshwari Pd. Yadav. For the Corporation: Dr. Poonam Kumari Singh. **** 03. 15.9.2010 Petitioner has been paid certain amount under the various heads indicated in Annexure-A but the stand of the opposite party is that payment under the revised pay scale which is being claimed by the petitioner is not being paid in absence of the requisite fund or support given by the State. The issue whether liability is limited to the Corporation or the State has an obligation is yet to be finally adjudicated in the matter which is pending before the LPA Bench, which is LPA No.960 of 2007. The claim of the petitioner would be decided in accordance with the said decision. As per now in view of the part compliance of the earlier direction the contempt application is dismissed with liberty as above. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)