IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Revision No.2959 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : JULY 4, 2011 RAMBHAJ ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. YP Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. SS Nara, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Ajit Atri, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Respondent No.2, being a juvenile, was tried by Juvenile Justice Board, Sonipat and convicted. An appeal was carried by respondent No.2. The appeal was pressed only in regard to sentence. The appellate court, vide the impugned judgment, has upheld the compensation payable to the petitioner to the tune of ` 1 lac. Because respondent No.2 had stayed behind bars for about 2-1/2 years at the time of investigation and trial, the order of sentence has been modified in part, while dispensing with performance of community service. I find the reasons to be plausible and they do not call for any interference. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. July 4, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?