1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5007 OF 2008 Shri Dhirajlal P. Tailor. ..Petitioner. V/s. Shri Nandkumar R. Sancheti. ..Respondent. Mr. Rahul Kate for petitioner. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : JULY 17, 2008. DATE : JULY 17, 2008. DATE : JULY 17, 2008. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. Insofar as the Order dated 6th January, 2007 below Exh.21 in Appeal No.466 of 2005 is concerned, the Petitioner cannot be permitted to challenge the said order after lapse of more than one and half years. Hence Petition filed against the said Order is rejected. Insofar as the Order passed by the Lower Court on 9th January, 2008 which is a second order challenged in the present Writ Petition, in my opinion, there is no infirmity in the view expressed by the Court below. Insofar as the documents at Exh.24, 25, 26 and 30 are concerned, those are admittedly public documents in respect of which formal proof is sufficient. Insofar as the documents 2 at Exh.27 and 29 are concerned, the Appellate Court is of the view that that evidence can be produced before it as additional evidence. That being the discretionary order, no interference in exercise of Writ jurisdiction is warranted. Hence Petition dismissed. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)