IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1278 OF 2003. WRIT PETITION NO. 1278 OF 2003. WRIT PETITION NO. 1278 OF 2003. Sushila Avinash Joshi & anr. ... Petitioners Versus. State of Maharashtra & anr. ... Respondents. Shri Vikram Pai for the Petitioners. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.1-State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. : ABHAY S. OKA, J. : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 29th Sept., 2005. : 29th Sept., 2005. : 29th Sept., 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Petitioners. Both the Courts below have held that the Petitioners have failed to prove their relationship with the Respondent No.2. After appreciating the evidence on record, the Courts below accepted the case of the Respondent No.2. The findings recorded by the Courts below are purely findings of fact based on appreciation of evidence. After having heard Shri Pai appearing for the Petitioners, I find no reason to interfere with the findings recorded by the Courts below. Hence the petition is rejected. Judge. Judge. Judge.