HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2243 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioners state that they have been accorded permission to make construction upon Plot No.293 (P) in Survey Nos.470 to 472, Kapra Circle, Keesara Mandal, Ranga Reddy District by the 2nd respondent on 23-10-2010. It is also stated that the construction was completed in accordance with the sanctioned plan. 2. The 1st respondent issued a notice, dated 26-12-2010, under Section 636 of the Hyderabad Municipality Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’), requiring the petitioners to remove the unauthorized construction. The petitioners challenge the same. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 4. Notice under Section 636 of the Act is to be preceded by the one under Section 452 of the Act. Further, in both the notices, the nature of deviations or unauthorized constructions must be clearly mentioned. The petitioners allege that they have not been issued any notice under Section 452 of the Act. This Court would have considered the feasibility of directing that the impugned notice is to be treated as the one under Section 452 of the Act and require the petitioners to submit their explanation. However, the impugned notice does not contain any particulars of deviation on the part of the petitioners. 5. Hence, the Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. It is, however, made clear to the respondents to issue a fresh notice under the relevant provisions of law and take appropriate steps. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J February 07, 2011. KTL