1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7130 OF 2009 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7131 OF 2009 [Rajeshree Shahu Samaj Probodhan Sevabhavi Sansthan Pangri,Tq.Jintur,Dist.Parbhani Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others ] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Ms.Surekha P.Mahajan,Advocate for petitioners. Shri.R.P.Phatke,A.G.P. for Respondent State. .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 8TH JULY, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners filed proposes for opening Science, Commerce and Arts 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Colleges. The petitioners did not receive any communication from the respondent-State, according to the learned counsel for petitioners. Therefore, these petitions are filed. The petitioners restrict the proposal to Arts and Commerce Colleges only. 3. The respondent-State filed affidavit in reply. 4. In case, the respondent-State has taken the decision, it ought to have been communicated to the petitioners. 5. Therefore, we direct the respondent- State through Principal Secretary, School Education Department Mantralya, Mumbai, State of Maharashtra to communicate its decision to the petitioners, within a period of eight weeks from receipt of 3 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders this order. 6. With the above directions, both the Writ Petitions are disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] MTK