BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P (S) No. , (5Q? {2009 PETITIONER : Madhusudan Das Vaishnav, S/o. Shri Kama! Das, aged about 24 years, kw R/o. Village Deoraha, P.O. Pharsadih, ”b W? Tahsii-Bilaigarh, District Raipur {6,9 (C.G.) NE Tv w¢{ VE RSUS Q3“ RESPONDENTS :1. (The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Panchayat and Rura! Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Coliector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bilaigarh, District Raipur (C.G.) Vigendra, S/o. Manharan Lal, Posted as Gram Rojgar Sahayak at Deoraha, P.O. Pharsadih, Tahsii-Biiaigarh, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. X x XI—HC—~78 mm WWW w P L§)...2>J2a. .. 11a; 2003 311%:1m (Wu) mmm‘ wmm WWW!“ SB : HON’BLE SHRI JUS’ICE PRITINKER DIWAKER 03.07.2009 Shri Anil Mourya, Ms. Sum'ta Jain. P.L for the State. Learned counsel f0 the petitioner submits that against the impugned order dated 28.2.2009 passed by the C.E.O, the petitioner has an altern WW§WW éa'aimm statutory remedy which he would like to avail 811d therefore e may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with a lib rty to approach the respondent No.2. He submits that a directi n may be issued to the respondent No.2 for deciding the app expeditiously. Accordingly, the pe tion is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. In the eventuality of tiling appeal by the petitioner before respond t No.2 within a period of ten days from the date of receipt f this order, it is expected that the same would be decided ex editiously preferably within a period of 45 days from the date o tiling of the appeal./ , oiwake‘ Wmw yidge r- II e a e .