IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26823 of 2008 ARBIND SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 8.8.2008 As prayed for, the learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph 1 of the petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pauthu P.S. Case No.34/07 for the alleged offences registered under sections 447, 323, 384 and 386/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the present case has been lodged on account of enmity between the parties since the brother of the petitioner has filed a complaint against the informant for committing the offence of trespass over the land of the brother of the petitioner and upon enquiry under section 202 Cr.P.C., cognizance was taken against the informant, her husband and others. So far as the present case is concerned, there 2 is no allegation of committing the extortion. The only allegation is that the accused persons came and asked to pay Rangdari every month. A supplementary affidavit has been filed to show that the petitioner is a man of means having no criminal antecedents and also having sufficient means and income-tax payee. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, it is directed that petitioner Arbind Sharma, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Pouthu P.S. Case No.34/07, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)