•v. #25 08.04.2011 Present: Petitioner in person with |V|r.|V|ayank l^lohan. Advocate. Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP for the respondent along with S.I. Surender Ahlawat, P.S. Hari Nagar. Respondent No.2 in person. +Crl.M.C. No.3957/2010 1. This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of FIR No.126/2009 under Sections 308/506 IPC P.S. Darya Ganj on the complaint of respondent No.2. 2. The ground for seeking quashing is that the petitioner and respondent No.2 are related to each other and they have amicably settled the matter and now there is no dispute left between them. 3. Petitioner is identified by his counsel Mr.Mayank Mohan. Respondent No.2 is identified by the Investigating Officer S.I. Surender Ahlawat. 4. Petitioner as well as respondent No.2 submits that petitioner is the real brother of the son-in-law of the complainant and the incident took place because of some matrimonial discord between the daughter of the complainant and his son-in-law. Both petitioner and respondent No.2 submit that, with the intervention of the friends and well wishers, they have amicably settled the matter and now there is no dispute left. Signing Date:17.08.2024 17:00:37 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 5. Respondent No.2 submits tliat he has settled the matter with the petitioner in the interest of harmonious family relations without any inducement or threat from any corner. His daughter and his son-in-law have now been living happily after the settlement and in the interest of their matrimonial life, respondent No.2 does not wish to have any action against the petitioner who is brother of his son-in-law and he has no objection if the x" FIR is quashed. 6. Learned APR submits that considering the delicate nature of relationship between the petitioner and respondent No.2 and the ^|ompromisearrived at betweenthem, State has no objectionif the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. 7. Since the parties have amicably settled the matter, I feel that no useful purpose shall be served by prosecuting the petitioner pursuant to the FIR. Accordingly, FIR No.126/2009 under Sections 308/506 IRC R.S. Darya Ganj and the proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed. Petition stands disposed of. i \ (AJIT BHARIHOKE) JUDGE APRIL 08, 2011 ks