J 3. 4. SA: ttoR'UteShrlSrtaWIC.Agntortt.A V 1tPetttm(tAlto.43ftt^3»8t f^BMier Respondenls Versus :1. Sah NmAmi Nag, W&^m Stidt* ig, s^adabout S1 ywrs, Rfo; wllage-Kodapali, Tahsil Saraipsdt, Dislrirt-Mateeaimmd ^.©^ Through: JSwSecKtosy. 2. 3. 4. 5. Cteiartmert, D.K.S. Sawst, Raiiwr (C-G-)- The eoltector Mahasamun^, Disbrict - MahasatnuiKf (C^ The Program^Pnie^ ^feer Wonren & Chitel Devrt^»n'rent^>ject, SaraipaU, Disfrict-Mal^samund ^•G^ The Chief Executive OSBcef, District Mah^annmd (C.G.) Smt. RajkumaRWo^hunrtb, Rfo. Wltag&-Koda|Mli, TahsU Saraipali. DistRCt-Mahassmund (C.G.) Mr. GoutamKbetrapal.counsel forttie pdBianer. Ms. ESeepatl F^ndey, fanel 1 3/State. .1 ORDER (Passed on 12°'day of Marcto, 2Mff) Leamed counsel app^iring for th®pditioner sutnuNs (hat the respondent No. Svas appolnted wUioutbemg her name in Ihfr s^ct llst. Herappomtment is in contravention ofthe AangamiiacU Schwie. Be that as tt may, the CollBctor, Mahasamund is dlra^d to todc inte the allegafion mads by the p^ifioner and pass appi^ijata erder in accoidancs with Aanganviadl Schwne and tewi?, wUHn a peitod of four weeks. ^ Thewritprtiflon fsacconBrgly dlsposedot Consequently, M.O<tf.)P. No. 89200)^ Nancte dlsp<»sdof. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge .y