^- '^ •^f^l^...,: SINGlEeEMGH ...••'1' A^^> :^X^^^^ ^^i^ RESPONDENTS INTHEHIGHCOURTOF^C^ W.P.tSINo.^^^^ PETITIONER c^ ^ Kundan Lal Sihgh^^ B^ Tnwm Sirtgh, aged about 50 years,^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ O Drsisioh Teacher Govt. Girls Middle SchQol, j Janakpur, Block BharatpurDistt.Korea(G.G.) VERSUS :1. <r State of Chhattisgarh, Through Seeretary Deparl^ent ^ Edlucation, >.K.S. Bhawan 2". Assistant Conimissioner Tribal li%aipi;T(6.G.). Development Department Balkunthpur, j Distriet Korea :'^,:^GO.;:':.''.::1:;.'1^^ 3. Assistant CQordinatcn', Adim Jati Kalyan Vibha|g, j Baikunthpur, District Korea(BG.) WRIT PETrriON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF< THE CG>NSTITUTIt>NbFINDIA ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (S) N0.4531 OF 2010 Kundan Lal Singh Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Shakti Raj Sinha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 19th day ofAugust, 2010) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file representation before the respondent authorities, to whichlearned counsel appearing for the State has noobjection. 2. It is ordered, as prayed for. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. As prayed, the petitioner is further at liberty to make an application along with his representation for staying the effect and operation of the impugned transfer order till disposal of his representation for cancellation of his transfer, if so advised. Amit Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge