IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2008 / 7TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 26093 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- T.O. BYJU, MANAGING PARTNER, EMMANUEL SILKS, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.M.B.PRAJITH SRI.TOJAN J. VATHIKULAM RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE SECRETARY, THRISSUR CORPORATION, THRISSUR. 2. THE THRISSUR CORPORATION, THRISSUR REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 26093 OF 2008 F = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 29th day of August 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that in relation to a trestle work done, on the basis of an agreement with his landlord, petitioner submitted Ext. P6 application for regularisation of the same. According to him, while his application is pending consideration of the 1st respondent, Ext. P7 notice of demolition has been issued. It is in this background the writ petition has been filed. 2. I heard the counsel for the petitioner and also the Standing Counsel who entered appearance on behalf of the respondents. 3. Having regard to the pendency of Ext. P6 praying for regularisation of the objectionable work, in my view it is premature to have issued Ext. P7. In view of this, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the 1st respondent shall take up Ext. P6, consider and pass orders thereon, if the application has been received and is pending. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible at any W.P.(C) No. 26093 OF 2008 -2- rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Until that is done, further action pursuant to Ext. P7 will be kept in abeyance. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-