/Vn,.. /LW IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION No. ‘ D35 /2oo PEYI‘ITIONERS l. Smt Prem Bai, Widow of Late w‘i" Bhagat Ram aged about 52 years, \9;%{,62/ resident of , village and post — ' Q . i .‘ .‘- t sw iI? :3 Janj gir-Champa (Chhattisgarh) Sakareli, Via — Baradwar, District — 2. Raghunandan Prasad, son of Late Bhagat Ram, aged about 15 years (Minor), through : natural guardian : Mother (Petitioner No.1), resident of village and post — Sakareli, Via — Baradwar, District — Janjgir— Champa (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. The Union of India, through : Ministry of Labour, New Delhi. The Central Provident Fund Commissioner, New Delhi. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional office, Near Navbharat Press, Rajbandha Maidan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Regional Provident I Fund Commissioner, State of Madhya Pradesh, Regional Office — Indore (Madhya Pradesh) 5. The Officer on Special Duty, Office of N.M.D.C., Shankar Nagar Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Enforcement Officer, Employees Provident Fund Office, Near Chhattisgarh Bhawan, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/ 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA mfwwem; wgg A WW ’m’*§~“ XI-HCv22 %<:>M«W W Shri Vinay Harit, Sr. _Shri Yashwant Singh, Urgent hearing is ann Lcarncd counsel for the Deposit Linked Insurauca Sc the present the petitioner In the detailed representation own merits in accordance wi Having considered and justice will be served if a dir make. a detailed representatio petition and this order, representation being med, respondents shall decide ctitioncr submits that thc matter relates to non—realization and payment of amount of Employees the respondents, which shall be considered and decided on its the merits of the case, in t e opinion of this-Court, ends of tion is gven to the petitioner to raismg his grievances before the and on such e competent authority of the e same on its own merits in accordance with law as earlylas possible preferably within two months“ from the date of rccei t of the representation. It is made clear that if any grievance s ‘ remains, the petitioner may avail the remedy Lulder the law. With the aforesaid o'bgservations, this petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P. F Nio. 959/ 2004 also stands disposed of. ing counsel for Union of India. t. Advocate for the State. eme, 1952. He submits that for be given an opportunity of filing fore the competent authority of law. ithout expressing any opinion on Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge Shri A.N. Bhakta, Adv. for the petitioners. d competent authority of the re pondents along with a copy of the 'hin 15 days, S w v t .w 3y m. l03S*/0V mm W 206) W mm WW WW mmmm WW @W $Wemé¥r 27-4-2004