1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLN. NO. 199 OF 2006 Yogesh Chetanand Tile .. Applicant Versus Yogita Yogesh Tile and Ors... Respondents Mr. H.E. Palwe for the Applicant Mr. A.R. Patil for the Respondent No.3 CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI, & SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : 3 RD OCTOBER,2006 P.C. :- We have heard learned counsel for the applicant. In our opinion, this Criminal Revision Application does not deserve to be admitted. The impugned judgement and order is well reasoned. The applicant has not been able to prove that he was married to one Jaishree. The Family Court has rightly placed reliance on the evidence of the respondent-wife that the petitioner is a man having sufficient means and he has failed and neglected to provide maintenance to her. We find no reason to interfere with the impugned judgement and order. 2 Hence Criminal Revision Application is rejected. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI,J.) (SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)