hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2645 OF 2006 Shri. Somnath Sakaru Zade ... Petitioner Versus Shikshan Mandal, Kalyan Dombivail Municipal Corpn. Kalyan and Ors. Respondents Mr. S.D. Patil for Petitioner. Mr. R.D. Rane, Government Pleader for R. No. 4. Mr. A.S. Rao for R. No. 3. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & S.J.VAZIFDAR,JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR,JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR,JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 05, 2007 DATED: FEBRUARY 05, 2007 DATED: FEBRUARY 05, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Even if we direct the representation to be decided, that would not result in any order being passed as the Zilla Parishad is not competent to pass such order. The Petitioner was erstwhile employee of the Respondent No. 1. Pursuant to orders passed by Respondent No. 4, the Petitioner is now absorbed in the services of Respondent No. 2. It is the grievance of the Petitioner that the order of absorption is illegal. Then he must challenge that order. That is not the subject matter of the present petition. Considering the above, Petition dismissed with liberty to the Petitioner, if so advised to challenge the said order by way of writ petition. Petition disposed of. (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)