IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2010 / 31ST ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 22959 of 2010(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. JITHIN THOMAS, AGED 22, S/O.V.T.THOMAS, VEETIYANKAL HOUSE, SAHYAGIRI P.O., MARAYUR, KOVILKADAVU, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. SAHEER, AGED 22, S/O.ABBAS, KOLAKKATTIL HOUSE, KADUNGANPURAM P.O., PARAVAKKAL, MALAPPURAM DT. 3. JAMSHID RAHMAN, AGED 22, S/O.MUHAMMED ABDUL RAHMAN, NALAKATH HOUSE, ERANHIMANGAD P.O., MYLADI, NILAMBUR. 4. VINEETH, AGED 22, S/O.P.BALAKRISHNAN, 123A, JWALAGIRI, AMBALAMUGAL P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. ANTONY THOMAS, AGED 21, S/O.THOMAS JOSEPH, NALPATHIL HOUSE, KANJIPPADAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.A.RANJITH NARAYANAN SRI.S.K.SAJU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, 673 635. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT- 673 635. ADV.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.22959 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners are students, who wrote B.Tech. Degree examination from the K.M.C.T. Engineering College, Kozhikode, conducted by the 1st respondent-University in December, 2009. They have submitted applications for revaluation of their answer papers. They complain of delay in completing the revaluation process. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the University points out that the results of the 5th petitioner have been withheld for shortage of attendance and, therefore, at present, the 5th petitioner's application for revaluation cannot be considered. 3. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to complete the revaluation process and publish the results thereof, for which petitioners 1 to 4 have applied, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. As far as the 5th petitioner is concerned, he may move for revaluation after the results are published. This is subject to further condition that the applications submitted by the petitioners are in order in all respects. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2