1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 18th day of October, 2011 First Bail Application No. 85 of 2011 Criminal Side Sumer Chand @ Sukka S/o Baru R/o Village Maulna P.S. Jhabrera District Hardwar …….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…..Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime. No.80 of 2010 Under Sections: 302 of I.P.C. Police Station: Bhagwanpur District: Hardwar Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A., present for the State. Heard. Applicant– Sumer Chand @ Sukka, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 80 of 2010, relating to offence punishable under section 302 of I.P.C., police 2 station Bhagwanpur, District Hardwar, has sought his release on bail. It is a case of circumstantial evidence. Co accused Chota @ Gautam and Isam Singh with similar role have already been directed to be released on bail. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that a ridiculous story has been developed that the wife and the son of the deceased got him murdered due to the reason that he did not used to bring his earnings home, and for that reason the widow and the son spent ` 50, 000/- to get the deceased killed. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this court is of the view, that applicant deserves bail. The Bail Application is allowed. Let the applicant- Sumer Chand @ Sukka, be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt.18.10.2011 Nahid 3