cr’ Wv BFORE E THE JUDICTURE A OF HON'BLE CHATTESGA£§€ H HIGH COURT AT BILSPUR A. w.P. ”/3 201 /0 (WRI UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 CONSTITUTION F INDIA} T O / IOI L vf PETET :Roop Singh Verma S/o Basant Singh Verma, aged about 51 years, Revenue Patwari Dhamadha Revenue Circle, Tahsil Dhamadha Districé Durg<C.G.) R/o Shankar Nagar Chhawani District Durg (C.G.) VR$US E : v LSte of hhattisgarh a sPON 3 REDEL T ” ? Through Chief Secretary Raipur. 2. Hon'ble Lok Ayukta Through Secretary, Bhopal (M.P.‘ old Sachiwalaya, Bhop (M.P.) 3. Serintendent Police, up Special Police Establishment Lok Ayukta, Raipur ((2.6%) 4. $hri Anil Pathak, Inspector of Police Special Police Establish- ment Lok Ayukta, Raipur Investing Officer . 5. Shri Toman 3ingh Sonwani Then $1.110 Bivisional Officer (Revenue), Patan District Durg, P‘resently posted as (Revenue) Govt. of Chhattisgarh at Raipur. 6. Competent Authority . Urban Lané Ceiling. Durg— Bhilai . Shri G.L. Yadav, Then Naib Tahasildar,, Bhilai-3 m)” $AN‘ Now at Ealoa, District Durg.(c -2- #9 ‘ . ; , i, V/“at C ‘ } al ? 8. Shri B.R. Lahari Then Tahasildar Patan Distt. Durg, now posted at Abhanpur District Raipur (C.G.) Enquiry Officer. 9. Shri A.K. Shrivastava, then Tahasildar, Patan Now posted at Simga District Raipur. 10. Shri M.D. Tigala, then N—aib Tahasildar Bhilai-3 Now posted at Bhatapara. ll. Sub Divisional Officer (ReVenue) Patan at Durg (3.6.) WRIT ”PETETION UNDER ARTICLE. 226, 227 CQNSTETUTION OF ENDIA HEGH COURT OFCHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 1613 (£2001 PETITIONER : Roop Singh Verma. VERSUS RESPONDENI‘S : State of Chha‘aisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA K J. , Aom'hotri SB: Hmfble Sbri ,Satish Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate on behalf of Shri Yashwant Tiwari, Advocate for tha petitioner. Shri A.S.Kachhwaha,‘ Dy. AL}. for the State. Present: ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 21g day 9f July, 2010) structions. seeks permission of this Court to Withdraw this petition with liberty to raise the issue afresh if new cause ofaction arises. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no obj ection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently. the writ petition is dismissed as Withdrawn with the aforestated liberty, if so advisedgx ' Sdl- Learned cotmsei appearing for the petitioner, on in r Satish K. Agnihotri ‘L/Eae Amit