FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. District : Jalgaon Letters Patent Appeal No. 73 of 2009 (Kailash Nathu Suryawanshi Vs. Ashok Barikrao Somwanshi & others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................. Mr. S.P. Brahme, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. R.J. Godbole, Advocate, for respondent no.1. Mr. K.G. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. .............................................................................. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 7TH SEPTEMBER 2009 1. The appeal arises basically out of the proceedings determining the inter se seniority between the appellant and the respondent no.1. It was the basic contention of the appellant (petitioner in the Writ Petition), that the seniority, so determined, showing the respondent no.1 senior to the appellant, was adjudicated by the Education Officer without following procedure established by law. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders 2. However, subsequently, it appears that the issue of seniority, between the appellant and the respondent no.1, has been determined by the learned Presiding Officer of the School Tribunal, wherein the respondent no.1 has been held to be senior to the appellant. In that view of the matter, nothing survives in the appeal. 3. The appeal is, therefore, disposed of. ( N.D. DESHPANDE ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE bgp/73lpa