IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6792 of 2003 VEERENDRA OJHA S/O RAJ KISHOR OJHA, R/O VILLAGE- BARKA SINGHANPURA, P.S.- SIMARI, DISTRICT- BUXAR…………………………………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR BUXAR. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DUMRAON, DISTRICT-BUXAR. 4. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SIMARI BLOCK. 5. CIRCLE OFFICER, SIMARI, POLICE STATION SIMARI, DISTRICT- BUXAR. 6. SAROJ KUMAR OJHA S/O SHRIBADRI NATH OJHA MUKHIA OF BARKA SINGHANPURA AND CONTRACTOR, POLICE STATION- SIMARI, DISTRICT-BUXAR. 7. GRAM SALEHA, BARKA SINGHANPURA P.S. SIMARI DISTRICT- BUXAR THROUGH- MUKHIA BARKA SINGHANPURA P.S. SIMARI DISTRICT – BUXAR 8. SHARADA NAND OJHA S/O LATE UMESH OJHA, R/O VILLAGE BARAKA SINGHANPURA, P.S. SIMARI DISTRICT- BUXAR. For the petitioner………………………………………………………….Rang Nath Chauby For the intervener………………………………………………………Shailendra Kumar Jha For the State……………………………………………………Binod Kumar (A.C. to SC-V) For the respondent No. 6……………………………………Akhilesh Kumar Pandey ----------- 8 14-07-2010 The dispute is in respect of implementation of a decision of Gram Sabha in which the villagers agreed to part with certain piece of their land to enable the authorities to lay down pitch road. Grievance of the petitioner is that although he had parted with the possession of his area of plot but the other villagers did not comply with the decision of Gram Sabha. When the case was taken up on 10.5.2010, counter affidavit was filed by the Block Development Officer in which it was stated that the construction work of the road has already been stopped on the complaint of the petitioner. This court also directed the Circle officer to submit his report and he has submitted the report that so far as the land of the petitioner is concerned, the same is still in possession of the petitioner and the road has not been constructed on the same. Construction work of the road up to both end of the land of the petitioner is complete. The dispute is between the villagers in respect of the decision of the Gram Sabha. Therefore, it would be appropriate for the petitioner or any other aggrieved party to approach Gram Sabha again to resolve the dispute. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. S.P. (J. N. Singh, J.)