( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8638 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1006 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 16142 OF 2002 Bhanudas s/o Mohan Naik-Thigle through L.Rs. Mrs. Shobha w/o Bhanudas Naik- Thigle and others. APPLICANTS VERSUS Ramrao s/o Wamanrao Hange RESPONDENT ..... Mr. Girish Naik-Thigle, advocate for the applicants. Mr. M.R. Andhale, advocate for the respondent. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 25th August, 2009] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. It appears that writ petition No. 910/2008 was wrongly registered though delay condonation application bearing Civil Application No. 1006/2006 was pending. It appears that while passing the restoration order dated ( 2 ) 30-06-2009, initially, restoration of civil application No. 1006/2006, which was dismissed in default, was rightly mentioned, but subsequently due to wrong impression that writ petition itself was dismissed in default, the number of petition was rectified as writ petition No. 910/2008. This is only an inadvertent error which has crept in. Therefore, the delay condonation application bearing civil application No. 1006/2006 is restored to its original position and only after the delay is condoned, the writ petition may be taken into consideration. The clarification would suffice the purpose and same be effected by rectifying the order dated 30-06-2009. Accordingly, present civil application is allowed. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/CA8638-09