_.9_’ behalf of the respondent/University as comd be seen from the order-sheet dated 16I09l2002. The University for the reasons best known to it and despite lapse of several years has not chosen to me repiy. Even at the time of hearing today, none appeared nor any representation was made on behalf of the Unlversitylrespondent. The dispute brought before the Court relates to the career of a student and therefore there is no warrant for this Court to defer the decisiommaking, particularly, in the absence of even a request from the University. (2) Heard Mr. B.D. Guru, learned counsel for the petitioner, .perused the writ petition and the 'documents appended to the writ petition. The petitioner has annexed a copy of the notification issued by the respondent/University inviting the applications from eligible candidates for admission to various courses run by the University. Paragraph 5 of the e notmoation reads as follows: "(5) we/qamdt/qaom we titer it ates ti wwamtw (m+2+3)a%enaa Wma‘tst immat'ioeoeggiwwm W at i“ The petitioner in paragraph 5.1of the petition has stated that he carefully read the notification and thought that in terms of paragraph 5, he was qualified for admission because he had acquired LAI and B.A. well before 1990 and accordingly he applied for admission to the Post Graduate Degree course leading to MA. in English. if the Court were to go by Annexure—Pl’iadvertisement, particularly, the condition incorporated in para 5 referred to above, the stand now taken by the University is e untenable. i am at a ioss to understand why and how the petitioner did not have the prescribed educational qualification for admission to the Post GraduateiDegree Course in English. The University has not_piaced any co’ntra material before the Court to support their action. in the light of the materiais‘ pieced before the Court, it could not be said that the petitioner lacked gregaribed educational qualification for admission to the MA: (Previous) Course. (3) in the result, the writ petition is aliowed. A direction shall issue te the respondenti’University to declare the result of the petitioner in the MA. (Previous) Eiramination conducted during the academic year 1998—99 and if he has pasSed in the said examination, then to permit him to pursue MA. (Final) Course subject to the petitioner fulfilling other formalities. The petitioner is entitled to the cost of this case which is quantify at Rupees Three Thousand payable to the petitioner within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. l