R.F.A. No. 1938 of 2006 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No. 1938 of 2006 (O&M) Date of decision : 24.1.2011 Ishar Singh and others .... Appellants vs State of Hayana and others .... Respondents Coram : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. H. S. Grewal, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL, J The landowners have filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly the facts are that vide notification dated 23.1.1991 published on 1.2.1991 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') the State of Haryana acquired land in the revenue estates of village Lotan, Hadbast No. 291, Tehsil and District Ambala, for construction of Naneola minor from RD 22235 to 35100. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, 'the Collector') vide his award dated 22.12.1993, assessed the compensation for the acquired land @ ` 38,152/- per acre for chahi/nehri and ` 6,359/- per acre for gair mumkin kind of land. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below determined the market value of the acquired land @ ` 45,000/- per acre. Aggrieved against the award of learned Court below, the landowners are before this Court. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the issues raised in the present appeal are squarely covered by judgment of this court in RFA No. 1906 of 2006 Jagir Singh and another vs State of Haryana through the Collector Ambala and another, decided on 30.11.2010. R.F.A. No. 1938 of 2006 (2) Learned State counsel did not dispute the aforesaid factual position. Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in Jagir Singh's case (supra), the appeal is disposed of in the same terms. 24.1.2011 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge