7 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) N0.^ 1'?^ 201 1 PETITIONERS ^' 1. Motiram Turkar, S/o. Heeralal Turkar Age 58 years, Presently posted as Revenue Inspector, at Tahsil Office Chowki, District-Rajanandgaon (CG) 2. Jagdish Prasad Amrodiya, S/o. late Soma Chandra, Age 54 years, Presently working as Revenue Inspector at Land Record Branch, District-Rajanandgaon (CG) .^". 3. Lokdas Sahu, S/o. Shri Rama Sahu, Age 53 years, Presently working as Revenue Inspector at Nazul Janch Sakha, District-Rajanandgaon (CG) 4.' Mansha Ram Nayak, S/o. Shri Parsuram Nayak, Age 57 years, Presently working as Revenue Inspector at Diversion Branch, District-Rajanandgaon (CG) 5. Rajman Ram Kawde, S/o. Shri Aasharam Kawde, Age 57 years, Presently working as Revenue Inspector at Diversion Branch, District-Rajanandgaon (CG) 6. Ghanshyam Shende, S/o. Shri MotiramShende, Age 57 years, Presently working as Revenue Inspector at Rajaswa Niriksheik Mandal, Tahsil - Chhuria District-Rajanandgaon (CG) ^ 7. Nanheram Janghel, • S/o. Shri Horilal Janghel, Age 56 years, Presently working as Revenue Inspector at Tahsil Chuikhadan, R.I. Circle - Gandai District-Rajanandgaon (CG) .9 Versus / RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 'y 2. The Director (Land Records), Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Commissioner, O/o. the Comniissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Collector, District-Rajnandgaon (CG) District-Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ••^i 'M'y'^ § •^// A. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTTSGARH AT B1I .ASPTTR WRTT PETmON (S) No. 5151 of2011 PETmONERS RE8PONDENT8 Motiram Tuikar & Otfaers. VP.RSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRITPETmON LINDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTmmON FINDIA SB: Hon'We Shri Satish K. Agnthotri, J. Amit Present: Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate forthe petitioners. Shri V.V.S. Moorthy, Deputy Advouale General fur the Stete/rwpondents. Shri S.P. Navralna, Dy. Conimissioner (R), Bilaspur, is presenl. ORBRttfQRAJj (Passed on 06" day ofSeptember, 2011) 1. At tiie very oiriset, Shri Moorthy, leamed counsel appearine for llie State/respondents, on instnictions, siibmits that tfae order dated 18.08.2011 (Aime3a»reP/l) impugned herein, has not been passed by a competent authority in accordance with Rnle 20, Part IL of the Madhva Pradesh/Chhattisgarh Land Record Manual, thus, the same is unsiistainabte in law and shall not be given effect to. 2. In view of tfae above sitbmission made bv leamed State counsel, according to leamed couawl for the petitioners, noflung siirvives for adjudication at this stage. 3. Accordinely, the impu@ied order dated 18.08.2011 (Annexiu-e P/l) is quashed. However, liberty is reserved to the State/r^pondente to pass appropriate order, if so advised, in acc<>rda.ace with law, in 'admimstrative exigency and in public iaterest. 4. Tbe writ petition is allowed. No order asto cosis, Sd/- _ . , SatisbK.Agnih"»l Judge M^iiS