1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO.580/2002 (D) Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited through its Managing Director, Prakashgad, Bandra (East), Mumbai and others ...Versus... Sunita widow of Sudam Homkar and others --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri R.E. Moharir, Adv. for appellants] [Shri A.S. Chandurkar, Adv. for respondents] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 08.01.2010 1. Learned Counsel for the respondents submits that rate of interest that was awarded by the trial Court was 12% per annum and when the judgment was pronounced by this Court in open Court on 30.11.2009 the same was reduced to 6% per annum. But when the certified copy has been received there is no mention about the same at all in the judgment. 2. Learned Counsel for the appellants does not dispute this position. 3. It is correct that the judgment does not show anything about rate of interest either way and it appears to be mistake due to inadvertence. Hence, following sentence shall be added in the last paragraph of the judgment. “The rate of interest awarded by the trial Court i.e. 12% per annum is, however, reduced to 6% per annum.” JUDGE SSW