^^tlllBENCT' ^ (Q^^^^^ ;w"" .^4- 3^^ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (SlNo. ^^\S OF 2010, PETITIONERS ^l. Shri Ram Krishna Piislipal<<ir, S/o. Shri Paras Ram Pushpakar, aged about 54 years, Lecturer, Govt. Middle School l::>anduka, Block - Chhura, District Rnipur (C. G.) ^^ i^^^ ^y ^p"'.^' ^'^ l'^'' " ^ Shri Manhara]i Lal Vcrma, S/o. Shri Vijay Ram Vcrma, aged about 52 ycars, I.cctiircr, Govt. Middle School ALarmara, Block- Chhura, District Raipur (C. G.) Amrit Lal Sahu, S/o. Shri Thakur Ram SahLi, aged about 52 years, I^ccturer, Govt. Middle School Pandut<a, Block - Chhura, Dislricl Ruipui (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarli, Through: The Secrelary, Tribal Welfare Deparlmcnt, D.K.S. Bhawaj-i, Raipur(C, G.) </].^ ^>• 2. Assistant Com rn i ss i (»i u; r, Tribal Welfare Department, I^ai|:)ur District Raipur (C. G.) c ,3. Block Education OITic'er, Chhura, District Raipur (C.G.) 4. Trcasury Officer, Treasury Account ancl l)ensioii, Raipur, District Raipur (C. Cl.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA a ^ HIGH COURt OF CHHATTISGARH : BU-ASnJR Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J. PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.3318/2010 Shri Ram Krishna Pushpakar and Others Versus State of Chhattisgarh and othere lopwraA Present: - Shri Somkant Verma. couns^ for the petitionere. Shri Bhastair Payashi, F^inel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 08th July, 2010) The petitjonera were appointed in Basic Training Instftute on a fixed pay of Rs.lOCy- and after that Rs.150/- jn the second year after ctearance of the flrst annuat examination during probation pertod. After comptetion of their probatfon period, they were granted regular pay scate of Rs.169-30(V-. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the p^tttonere submitted that the ^ue involved in the case is as to whether the petittonere are entttted to regular pay scate wfth effect from the date of initial appointment or after comptetion of probatfon period. 3. TTie issue involved herein was consklered by the Madhya Pradesh State Admjnistratwe Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu andSS Others v. State ofM.P. A others), wherein it was hetel that the similarly situated teachers are entitted to regular pay scale with eflect from the date of inttial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'bte Su|Mrcwne Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'bte Supreme Court upholding the decision of ^^••^ ^'"^"^Jl -' ^ the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitted to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petftfoners further submits that this Court, whiie considering the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu & others v. Stete Govf. of Chhattlsgarh & Another, W.P.(S).No.813 of 2007. by order dated 12/02/2007. has granted regular pay scale with eflfect from the date of initial appowitment. 5. Leamed counsel appearing for the parti^ jointly submit that the case is squarely covered by the decisfon of this Court in the case of Ram Kumar Sahu (supra). 6. In view of that, this petitton is altowecl on the same terms, sub^rt to veriffcation of the facts. No order as to costs. »-""£.'"""' Tumane