INTHEHIGHCOURT OFJUDieATURE AT BILASPUR. Writ Petition No.ll^ Tof 2004^ RESPONDENTS: ./^>% ^^' PE^nTIONER: Dhanendra Bhardwaj, son of Late Ramgulal Bhardwaj, aged about 27 years;- resident of Village Tekari, Post Mandhar Colony, District Raipur. Versus 1. Sfate of Chhattisgarh, Throueh; The Secretary, Department of Panchayat, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (C.G.). The District Education Officer, Raipur (C.G.). The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panehayat Simga, District Raipur (C.G.) The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Dharsiva, DistrictRaipur (C.G.) The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Tilda, District Raipur [C.G^-. WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 SB 2^7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OK WMTS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTORARI AND /OR ORDERISl AND 70R DIREenONISl IN THE NATURE OF WRTTS The humbte petition of the petitioner above named. MOSTJlESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: •^fi y 3. 4. 5. 1. Particulars oftbe fletitioaer: - As per the cause title. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ PetitionNo. 1157 of 2004 Petitioner: Dhanendia Bhardwaj Vcrsus Respondents: State of Chliattisgarh & ofhers g^. SIiy^e Beach: Hou'bfc Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, Shri Ajit Singli, Advocate fbr fhe petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel lawyer for the Respondeats No. 1 and 2. None for the respondents No. 3, 4 aad 5. A ORAL ORDER ( ig&Jst^ ^2006) The foUowing onder offhe Court is passed by Satish K. Agpiliotrl, J. 1. The fafher of fhe petitioner namely Shri Ramgulal Bhanlwaj, whfle working as Teacher in the Primaiy School, VWage- Chhapora (Lalpui^, District- Raipur, died in. hamess on 19.10.1999. The petitioner, being dependeat aad legat heir, was appointed on compassk>uate ground vide order dated 21.5.2001 (AnTiexure P/4} on the post of Stufesha Kanni Grade-III and pursuant to fhat order fhe petitioner joined his duties at Primary School - Sankra, Block- Tflda, District- Raipur. Later on fhis orderw^ withdrawn by order dated 26.6.2001 (Annexure P/1) ou the ground fhat fhe post on. vrtiich the petitioner was appointed on couipassionate ground, has beeaabolished. 2. Recenfly the State Goveminent has issued /circular dated 2.2.2006 to consider fhe cases of dependent legal heira of deceased employces on coinpassiouate basis. This Courjt has also passedorderdafed'20.12.2005 mW.P. No. 1322/2002 &adofher B%' l.lf(fe ,'^.-, connected inatteis, in icgard to fhe matters relatuig te> coinpassionate appointments. 3. Leamed counsel for the petitioner subnuts fhat fhe case offhe petitioner be also considered as per fhe provisions ofthe circular dated 3.2.2006 and in view ofthe order dated 20.12.2005 passed by fhis Court inW.P.No. 1322/2002 and ofher conuected inatters, to which leamed coiuisel for fhe Statc has no objection. 4. In view ofthe above, fhe State Govemment is directed to consider fhe case of the petitioner as per its own circular dated 2.2.2006 aad also in view of fhe order dated 20.12.2005, passed by fhis Court in W. P. No. 1322/2002 and other connected matters on its own merit, in accordance wifh law. 5. Fortiie reasons stated-above, fhewrit petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Thakuf Sd/- Satish l£^nihotri Judge