IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5546 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 28.10.2009 Shiv Sharan Kashyap .....Petitioner versus Sudharshan Kumar Gandhi & another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.M.S.Cheema, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Pawan Girdhar, Advocate, for the respondents. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 29.9.2008 passed by the Rent controller, Panchkula, whereby the eviction petition filed by the respondent-landlords regarding eviction of the petitioner-tenant from the demised premises comprising a residential house No.373, Sector-7, Panchkula, has been allowed and that order has been further upheld by the Appellate Authority, Panchkula, vide its judgment dated 15.6.2009. On 24.9.2009, when this matter came up for preliminary C.R. No.5546 of 2009 (O&M) 2 hearing, the following order was passed:- “After arguing the case at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that if some reasonable period is granted to the petitioner to vacate the demised premises, he does not want to press this revision petition on merits. He points out that the petitioner has school going children and as soon as the ongoing academic session is over, he will vacate the house immediately. He undertakes that the petitioner shall hand- over the vacant possession of the demised premises on or before 30.4.2010. In view of the aforestated undertaking and fair stand taken by counsel for the petitioner, let notice of motion be issued to the respondents for 28.10.2009. Process dasti only. Meanwhile, dispossession of the petitioner shall remain stayed.” In terms of the above-stated stand taken before this Court, the petitioner-tenant has filed an affidavit which is taken on record. As per the undertaking given in the affidavit, the petitioner- tenant has agreed to hand-over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlord positively by 30.4.2010. The petitioner has further undertaken to pay the monthly rent regularly on or before 10th day of every calendar month till he vacates the demised premises on or before 30.4.2010. The petitioner has also undertaken to pay the arrears of rent for 11 months alongwith the rent for the month of November, 2009 by way of demand draft in favour of the respondent- landlords within a period of 2 weeks from today. In the light of the above mentioned undertaking given by the petitioner-tenant, the counsel for the respondent-landlords has come up with a fair stand that he has no objection if the petitioner-tenant retains the C.R. No.5546 of 2009 (O&M) 3 demised-premises till 30.4.2010. The revision petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the above mentioned undertaking given by the petitioner-tenant. It is, however, clarified that the security, if any, deposited by the petitioner- tenant at the time when the demised premises was taken on rent, shall be refunded or he can adjust the same towards the arrears of rent which are payable within two weeks to the respondent-landlords. Dasti. 28-10-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE