THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.5141 of 2009 Dated 26th July, 2011 Between: Kasturi Jyothi …Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar District, and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: --- Counsel for the respondent Nos.1 & 2: AGP for Home The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal. This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to direct respondent No.1 to cause enquiry into the action of respondent No.2 in calling the petitioner regularly to the police station and pressurising her to transfer her husband’s immovable properties in the name of respondent Nos.3 and 4. In her affidavit, the petitioner has stated that respondent Nos.3 and 4, who are the younger brother of her husband and his wife, highhandedly trespassed into the petitioner’s house with criminal intention, armed with axe and threatened her and her husband with dire consequences. She further stated that her husband lodged a complaint in Konaraupet Police Station on 20.01.2009 and that the said police have registered the same as Crime No.4 of 2009 for the offences under Sections 452 and 506 IPC. It is further stated that as the petitioner’s husband left for Dubai for livelihood, taking advantage of his absence, respondent Nos.3 and 4 have been harassing the petitioner with the help of respondent No.2 by calling her to the Women Police Station, Karimangar and pressurising her to transfer the property in the name of respondent Nos.3 and 4. No counter affidavit is filed by the respondents. However, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that after completion of the investigation in Crime No.4 of 2009, a charge sheet was filed and the criminal case was taken on file as C.C.No.229 of 2009 by the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sircilla. She further stated that the very fact that the charge sheet has been filed on the complaint given by the petitioner’s husband shows that the police have acted in an impartial manner. In view of the above facts, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the same is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.6727 of 2009 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 26th July, 2011 VGB