1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.541 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.375 OF 2010 Sou. Hirabai @ Hiralaxmi C. Parekh & Anr. ...Applicants. v. Shri Shankarlal K. Rathod ...Respondent. Mr. J.Shekhar i/by J. Shekhar & Co., adv. for the Applicants. CORAM : J.H.Bhatia, J. DATE : 29th September, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicants, who are the original defendants. Their application for rejection of the plaint filed by the respondent/plaintiff under Order 7 Rule 11 has been rejected and that order is challenged in the present revision application. According to the applicants, suit is not properly valued. On perusal of the prayer clauses in the application, it appears that the plaintiff has only prayed that the defendants, who are the builders, should fulfill mandatory requirements of the provisions of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act (MOFA) and the suit is not for specific performance of the contract or possession. Therefore, there is no 2 substance in the revision application. 2 Revision application stands dismissed. 3 As the revision application itself is dismissed, civil application does not survive and stands disposed off accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)