FAO No.4118 of 2010 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.4118 of 2010 (O&M). Decided on: February 22, 2011. Punjab State Warehousing Corporation Limited, through its District Manager. .. Appellant VERSUS M/s Padda Rice Mills and others. .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporter? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? * * * PRESENT Mr.Rohit Verma, Advocate, for the appellant. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'The Act') by one common order 31.09.2009 were decided. Two appeals under Section 37 of the Act have been . . . 1 FAO No.4118 of 2010 (O&M) filed against the same order. One appeal was decided as FAO No.980 of 2010, titled Punjab State Warehousing Corporation Limited Vs. M/s Padda Rice Mills, Alilwal, Road, Batala and others, on 21.05.2010. The said appeal was dismissed besides the following observations made in the order: - “No merit. Appeal dismissed. However, while disposing it of, it is made clear that arbitral award in respect of 1.5 times of the economic costs on account of said shortage and interest of the amount of shortage of two qualities of paddy calculated at the rate of 21% thereof, the Managing Director of the Corporation shall take a decision in the matter in accordance with law.” Counsel for the appellant submits that the same order be passed. Since the impugned order in both the appeals is same, the observations made in FAO No.980 of 2010, mentioned hereinabove, will also be operative qua the rights of the parties. Disposed of in similar terms. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE February 22, 2011. rka . . . 2