CWP No.17680 of 2010.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.17680 of 2010 Date of Decision: 29.09.2010 **** Gurjeet Kaur ... Petitioner VS. Amritsar Improvement Trust & Anr. …Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. GS Bajwa, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). This order shall dispose of CWP Nos. 17680 &17683 of 2010, as common questions of law and facts are involved in these cases. For brevity, the facts are being extracted from CWP No. 17680 of 2010. (2). The petitioner seeks direction for allotment of a plot measuring 400 sq. yards under the category of 'Local Displaced Persons' in the ‘Ajnala Road Area Extension Scheme’ floated by the Improvement Trust, Amritsar on the strength of the Division Bench decision dated 08.05.2006 of this Court rendered in LPA No. 751 of 1992 CWP No.17680 of 2010.doc - 2 – ( Sushma Palta and others vs. State of Punjab and others ) (Annexure P8). (3). While dealing with the similar issue in CWP No. 5026 of 2007 (Naranjan Singh v. The Amritsar Improvement Trust and another) decided on 06.03.2009 (Annexure P18), this Court held as follows:- xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx Learned counsel for the respondent- Trust, on the other hand, points out that they have already challenged the judgment of this Court before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and ad-interim stay has been granted in their favour. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondent-Trust to consider the claim of the petitioners in the light of Division Bench judgment of this Court dated May 08, 2006 in Sushma Palta's case (supra). However, if the respondents arrive at the conclusion that the petitioners' claim is covered by the said judgment, they need not to implement such a decision till the matter is decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. It is further directed that the consequential relief, if any flowing from the final judgment, shall be granted to the petitioners within a period of three months from the date of delivery of the judgment by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx CWP No.17680 of 2010.doc - 3 – (4). The present writ petition is also disposed of in the above-reproduced terms. (5). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 29.09.2010 vishal shonkar (SURYA KANT) JUDGE