® \,&^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISCIARH. BILASPOR w.f.lsUSp^cisiMaoo? PETITIOMBR Smt. Poonam Singh Beforc Mamage Poonaui Lanjewar Age about 32 years, U.D.T. W/o Shri Rajendra Singh Mahatma Gaadhi Hr. S.S. Durg Distt.- Dm^ (C.G.) Versus RESPOBIDBNTS l. State Govt, of Chhattisgarh Through Secretaiy Education & Urbaa Developnieat Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Distfc-Raipur 2. Miuiicipal Corporation Diirg, District- Durg (C.G.) Through : Cominissioner WRTT PETITIONUMDER AICTICLB 226 Q? THB COHSTITUIOM OFIHDIA Appearaace: Shri Ajay Sluivastava, counsel for thc petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Advocate for tJie Statc on advancecopy. ORAL ORDER (09.10.2007) SimiL KUMAR 8INHA. J. Heard on adm.ission. Leamcd counsel for fhe pctitioner submits that fhc petitioner bas passed B.Ed. exainination on her own expenscs, therefore, she ia entitled to vecewe Iwo advance increaments according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 anri 01.03.1999. He also subinits that ia saany identical matters, thc petitions have been allowed in tenns of tlie order passed in the case of Tashwtsivt Kumar Bharadwqj Vs. SSunlcipeil Corporatton, Darg and cuiother {S006 fiy MPJtR-CG 96^. Hc snbmits that her casc is squarety covcred by the said Judginent. This legal position is not disputed by the leamed counsel for fhe State. However, he snbmits fhat fhe oider inay be passed in terms of ttae said judginent, but it. shall be subjected to verificatiom regarding petitioner's siich qiialification. Accoriingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms ofthe oider passed in case of Yashwanl Kumar Bha.radwaj Vs. Shawspal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to the verification of flie facts as to whether the petitioner had acquired B.Erl. Examiiiation Cerdficate on her own e-xpenses as pcr circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and fiirther whethcr she has been pajd Iwo advance nicreincnts or not The petition stands finally disposed of. No onder as to costs. Sd/- Sani! Kumar Sinha . Judge