IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.5691 of 2008 Decided on: 16.6.2011 Shri Narain Singh & others ……….Petitioners. Versus Managing Director & others ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner. : Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate for respondent No. 1. None for respondents No. 2 to 9. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Ms. Archana Dutt, learned Counsel for the petitioners prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty reserved to the petitioners to make representation(s) to the Managing Director of the respondent-Corporation for the redressal of their grievance(s). 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-Corporation to consider the representation(s), as and when the same is/are made by the petitioners, within a period of ten weeks, after production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioners. While deciding the representation(s), to be made by the petitioners, the averments contained in the supplementary affidavit, filed on 31st March, 2011, in pursuance to the directions of this Court issued on 11th March, 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No. 2011, shall also be taken into consideration and thereafter a speaking/detailed order shall be passed after hearing the petitioners. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma Judge June 16, 2011. (hl)