IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6449 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.11.2010 Jai Kishan Jindal and others ....Petitioners Versus Vipin Kumar ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) The only dispute in the present petition is pertaining to the remaining decretal amount. Learned counsel appearing for both the parties, on the instructions of their respective clients, stated that petitioners/judgment-debtors shall pay Rs.10,000/- to the respondent/decree-holder on or before 28.2.2011. Both the learned counsel further stated that present petition be disposed of having recorded full satisfaction of the decree. It has further been agreed that if amount of Rs.10,000/- is not deposited or paid by the petitioners on or before 28.2.2011, respondent shall be entitled to recover Rs.10,000/- along with interest @ 12% per annum through the execution. Petition stands disposed of. (Alok Singh) Judge November 18, 2010 R.S.