IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 20TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 29TH BHADRA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 409 of 2011(S) ---- --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- ANIL, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. VISWAMBARAN, T.C 49/81, PATTUVILAKATHU VEEDU, PRA -24, KAMALESWARAM, MANACAUD.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SMT.L.SATHY RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAUPRAM - 695 001. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, FORT POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, FORT POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 4. SATHOON, SUDHEENA MANZIL, T.C 49/56, PRA 15-1, KAMALESWARAM, MANACAUD.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 009. 5. KATHIJA, W/O. SATHOON, SUDHEENA MANZIL, TC 49/56, PRA 15-1, KAMALESWARAM, KANACAUD.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 009. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. C.M. KAMAPPU THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DS WP(Crl.).No. 409 of 2011(S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE ELECTION IDENTITY CARD OF THE PETITIONER. P2: COPY OF THE SSLC BOOK OF THE DETENUE. P3: COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 19.8.2011 ISSUED FROM THE SUB REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, KILLIPPALLAM. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE DS THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ----------------------------------- W.P(Crl.).No.409 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. The petitioner, aged 35 years going by his affidavit, has filed this writ petition seeking the issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus in relation to Najima, a female born on 27.5.1993, going by the papers on record. This means that she attained the age of 18 years on 27.5.2011. Along with this writ petition presented on 2.9.2011, the petitioner has produced a receipt issued by the Sub Registrar, Chalai on 19.8.2011, for having received an amount of Rs.3/- towards notice for special marriage under the Special Marriage Act. By that document, nothing is evidenced except the payment of money, though the name of Najima is shown therein. We, therefore, wanted the petitioner to place better particulars or materials since, ultimately, we would be asking a female, just WPCR.409/11 2 turned a major, belonging to a community other than that of the petitioner and one nearly half his age, to come over to the court on the plea of the petitioner that he and she are in love. We had minuted a couple of orders earlier in this matter, clearly expressing that the materials on record do not inspire confidence to issue notice. Yet, in spite of repeated adjournments, no further materials are placed. Nor is there any representation. We do not find any ground to entertain this matter. The same is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR, Judge. kkb.20/9.