as^i^1 ^ i.^. !i*^ ^-.^'.^ • f^. C^- ?€T^ ^ BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCHHATnSGARH) W.P. (•0 No. !3l'9S of 2010 PETITIONER \^ ,v>^y ^^^" s, ''/^y^v- ^<J'\^- s^-'^ f.'<-'' <<'?' . .••' Durg District Bus Mini Bus Owners Association, through- Secretary Raman Bihari Kannoje, S/o Late Shri R.K. Kannoje, aged about 45 years, Shyam Nagar, Polsaypara, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ^%, / ^-> ' 'o '. .••'*^-- i®jSA^2ftj-a \i 5»V \t^^. -X '^J y VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ 1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary Transport Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) /-2) Secretary Regional Transport Authority D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) , 3) Commissioner, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 4) Superintendent of Police, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 5) Collector, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ^ aj '! / E- f-' • ItBSHi i:. WRIT PETITION UNDER ' ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS/DIRECTION OR OTHERAPPRO_PRIATE_WRLT, "!B^^I%^^^ :::;::'""'-KBBf ,• l?»'g;?ggil HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 N0.5198 OF 2010 Petitioner Durg District Bus Mini Bus Owners Association Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K.Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State 2. (Passed on 10" day of September, 2010) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that some anti socia! eiements are creating nuisance and causing !oss to the Buses runnlng in District Durg. The compiaint has been made to the Coliector, Durg on 23.1.2010 (Annexure P-9). Prior to that Superintendent of Police was also requested to take appropriate action by letter dated 7.12.2009. No action has been taken on behalf of the officers, when more than six months have already It appears that the officers, heading the Distrlct are not paying any heed to the complaints. !t has to be done at least in accordance with law. If no action has been taken on the above stated complaints, the Collector, Durg, and Superintendent of Police, Durg, are directed to look in to the complaints made by the petitioner and take appropriate action in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a period of two weeks. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. ashok Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge