IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. -M No. 18432 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.8.2011 Jai Kumar @ Jeetu ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Haryana ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present : Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in the present case on the statement of the person, who was arrested on the spot along with 130 grams of smack. The person arrested stated that money to purchase smack and the motor cycle was given to him by the petitioner whereas the case of the petitioner is that he does not own motor-cycle and does not know the accused, who has been arrested. He has been falsely implicated only for the reason that he had earlier filed a complaint against the police officials, which was later on compromised. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submitted that the petitioner was earlier involved in five other cases out of which one was under Section 302 IPC. Considering the past record of the petitioner, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of pre arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. ( Rajesh Bindal ) 12.8.2011 Judge Meenu