WP(C) 2670/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. D Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. G Soren, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Heard Mr. I Choudhury, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 5. Let a Rule issue calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a Writ should not be issued as prayed for; and/or why such further or other order( s) should not be passed as to this Court may deem fit and proper. No formal notice need be served on the respondents as they have already entered appearance and accepted notice through their engaged counsel. However, e xtra copies of the writ petition and annexure thereto should be supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents, during the course of the day. Considering the nature of grievances, which the petitioner has raised, and the n ature of reliefs, which the petitioner has sought for, this Court is of the view that this writ petition needs to be expeditiously disposed of. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the notice is made returnab le on 14-09-2010. In the meanwhile the parties shall exchange their pleadings. Let the relevant record be produced by the respondents at the time of hearing. Let the counter affidavit, which is claimed to have been filed by the re spondent Nos. 2, 4 and 5, on 09-08-2010, be placed on record.