IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15523 of 2010 1. RAM PRASAD KAHAR , S/O LATE DAMRI KAHAR 2. ALGU KAHAR, S/O RAM PRASAD KAHAR 3. KANTU KAHAR, S/O RAM PRASAD KAHAR 4. SANGITA DEVI, W/O ALGU KAHAR 5. KALBAS DEVI, W/O KANTU KAHAR ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – TAMARH, P.S.–BHABUA (SONHAN),DISTRICT – KAIMUR (BHABUA) ---- Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR --- Opposite Party ----------- 2/ 18.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel is that demand of dowry was not a reason for differences. Anyway, deceased while was injured was admitted to hospital. Informant and his family members were informed also. So, after thorough verification only husband was found responsible for committing the offence, even then, cognizance is taken against all these petitioners who are father- in-law, 2 brother-in-law and 2 their wives apprehending their arrest which never can be justified. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order in connection with Bhabua (Sonhan) P.S. Case No. 213 of 2008 (Tr. No. 627 of 2010), above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Bhabua (Kaimur), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. Praful ( Mandhata Singh , J. )