IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2009 / 2ND POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 37472 of 2009(D) -------------------------- ID.3/2009 of LABOUR COURT, KANNUR .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.BALAIYYA, "PRATHESHMA" BEERANTH BAYAL, KASARAGOD. BY ADV. SRI.K.PRAVEEN KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. M.T.MANOHARAN, S/O. NARAYANI AMMA, BEERANTHA BAYAL, KASARAGOD-671121. 2. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SECRETARY LABOUR AND RE-HABILITATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSHKUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 37472 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 23rd December, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is the management in I.D.No. 3/2009 before the Labour Court, Kannur. In that I.D, the petitioner filed M.P.No. 54/2009 for taking out a Commission to ascertain whether the establishment is closed or functioning. That application was dismissed by Ext. P5 order. The petitioner is challenging that order in this writ petition. 2. Ext. P5 is only an interim order in an industrial dispute. This Court and the Supreme Court have repeatedly frowned upon piece- meal adjudication of disputes. I am of opinion that the petitioner should more appropriately challenge Ext. P5 while challenging the award to be passed in the I.D, if the same is adverse to the petitioner. Therefore, without prejudice to that right, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.