THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24916 of 2010 Dated 05th October, 2010 Between: M. Srinivasa Reddy …Petitioner And The District Registrar, Vijayawada and another. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri P. Sri Raghuram Counsel for respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2 in not receiving the document presented by the petitioner in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.5.00 in survey No.852/1 of Nunna Village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, Krishna District, as illegal. The petitioner sought for a consequential direction to respondent No.2 to receive and register the sale deed proposed to be presented by the petitioner for registration of the abovementioned land. I have heard Sri P. Sri Raghuram, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. I have also perused the record. The petitioner has purchased the above extent of land from the original owner of the property. When registration of the document at the time of the purchase by the petitioner was refused, he has filed W.P.No.2611 of 2008. Having considered the provisions of Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908 (for short ‘the Act’) in detail, this Court, by order dated 03.11.2008, held as under: “The admitted facts of this case reveal that none of the above mentioned clauses of Section 22-A of the Act is attracted as neither the alienation of the land in question is prohibited under any statute nor the same is notified as belonging to a Charitable and Hindu Religious Institution of Wakf falling under the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 or Wakf Act, 1955. In view of the same, the writ petition is allowed. The respondent is directed to receive the document from the petitioner and complete the formalities under the provisions of Section 65 of the Act, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” The said order was questioned by way of Letters Patient Appeal in W.A.No.231 of 2009 by the Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board. A Division Bench of this Court, after a thorough consideration of the case, dismissed the writ appeal as well as the writ petition, by its judgment dated 27.04.2009. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner and not disputed by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that the said judgment had attained finality. When the petitioner sought to present a document for sale of the very same land to a third party, respondent No.2 is stated to have not received the same on the same objection as was earlier raised and overruled by this Court. In my opinion, respondent No.2 is not entitled to raise the same objection again and again, at every stage of new transactions when the property remains the same. If respondent No.2 has no other legally sustainable objection for registration, he shall not refuse to register the document proposed to be presented by the petitioner. If respondent No.2 finds any other legal objection, which was not covered by the abovementioned two orders of this Court, he shall pass orders under Section 71 of the Act and communicate the same to the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date of presentation of the document by the petitioner. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.31863 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 05th October, 2010 GHN