THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29010 of 2010 DATE: 23.11.2010 Between: Sri Kamal Kishore Agarwal ………Petitioner and State of Andhra Pradesh and others ………Respondents COUSEL FOR THE PETITIONER : SRI SHYAM S.AGRAWAL COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS : AGP FOR REVENUE THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29010 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass an order, issue a Writ or any other direction in the nature of writ, more particularly, writ of mandamus declaring the notice of respondent No.3 dated 31.07.2010 vide letter No.D/1231/07 stating to have been issued under Section 7 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, affixed on the premises of the petitioner bearing municipal No.5-7-233 on 15.11.2010 as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded, against the provisions of the said Act and also the principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same directing the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over his property bearing municipal Nos.5-7-232/A and 5-7-233, total admeasuring 1428.5 sq.yards situated at Charkandil, Aghapura, Hyderabad.” At the hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents, on instructions, stated and the same is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after impugned notice was issued under Section 7 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (for short ‘the Act’), respondent No.3 passed an order under Section 6 of the Act on 17.11.2010 and served on the petitioner on 18.11.2010. Inasmuch as the impugned notice has worked itself out with the passing of final order, the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. The petitioner is entitled to question such final order by availing appropriate remedy. Subject to the above observation, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.36965 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 23rd NOVEMBER, 2010. kvni