FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 874 OF 2007 [Kisan Baban Mazire V/S. Dattatraya Kondiba Mazire & Ors.] _____________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court s orders : ’ or directions and Registrar s’ : Court s or Judge s orders ’ ’ orders : _____________________________________________________________________________________ Mr.Saurabh Railkar,adv.for appellant. Respondents and advocate absent. CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED : 17TH NOVEMBER 2009. PC :- 1. Liberty to the appellant to amend the memo of appeal to add page 3A thereto. 2. This Second Appeal is preferred on concurrent findings of facts and law by the courts below as regards the challenge by the appellant to the transaction of sale of the suit property between his father and respondent no.4. There is no dispute that the property sold by the father of the appellant was of his exclusive ownership. The appellant challenged the transaction of sale on the ground that the consideration paid by respondent no.4 for the land, was not adequate. Since the appellant did not have any right to the property during the lifetime of his father, he cannot challenge the transaction of sale of the property by the father to any person on any ground whatsoever. There is no question of law arising for consideration of this court. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed in limine. (Judge)