^. 'f' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI^ARHAT BILASPUR W.P.(SlNQ.T407of2067 Petitfoner : SmtRajiuSingh.WteShriM.P.Singh, aged about 54yeare, R/o Bils®pur(C.6.) Versus Respondents :1. StateofChhatB^iarti, ThroughSecrrtary, D.K.S. Krawan,Raipur(e.G.). 2. DireetorofPubliGlnsteucUen, PensionBada, Raipur(C.<3.) Singte Bencb: Hon'bto ^4r. JusBce SteUsh K. ^nlhoW. K4r. Kumaresh Thiart, Advocateforttie PetHionw. Mrs.Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Adwcatefortha re^>ondente®ato. ORDER (Passedonthis 12ttl d^ofMaroh. 2007) The peBttoner is woridng as Assislant Teacher in fiie flpvwnmNrt school. In Uw course of hls serores as Assldant Teacher, the peBfioner has obtahied B.Ed. ExaminaUon CertKteate on hisonm ®q;)»isesinthey«ir 1991-92 (PO). Leamedcounsel an^ring forttw petMenwsubmttelhatUwquaaUwi involved, heretn asto whettier the taacher. who B.Ed. :"» ExarainaBon Certificate on his wm ffiqwrees, Is ertiUed to twe actoance increments. ^cording to leamed counsel for ttie petiBoner, the pefifioner is snUBed two advance increments in vtew of the decteion <rf this Couitin tte caae of Yashwant Kumar Bharadw^ Vs. Whancipal Corporatton, Durgand another {2006 (l^ MPJR-CG 96}. This Court in ttie c®etf Yashwant Kumar BhaiaAwa Vs. Municipat CorporaB<%, Du^ w>d anolhw (Sup(a>, eame to the concluslon that the teushets, who had obteined B. Ed. ».TJ. Examinefflon CertificatB on tbsir wm ®q»nses,are eovwwl by the circular datod 24.12.98 ^nnexurs P/7) issued by the Slrte Government of Madhya I'radesh. ^ Leamed counsel forthe^tltionerftMttiwsubmilsttiatttietects antf qtresUon of taw invohred in the present cwe are squarety c<wered by decision of this Court tn the case <tf Yashtwint Kumar Kuwadwa^ V». MunicipalCorpoRitton, Oury »Nlamrther (Supra^, to which toained counsel appem'ing ft>r tha re^iondwts fafi^ eoneedes amt ayseeswto the avennent made by Isamed counsel an»earingiwthe p^fot^. AccoKlingly, the writ petifion is allowed in terms offceorder (»ssedin Uie case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Munidpal Corporadim, Dwg and another (Supra), subjwt to veriffcaUon of ttie fact as te wheBier tts petitioner has acquired B. Ed. E)Bnnfratton CertiWcate on his awn expenses as per th®circ«ila»sdatad24.12.t^& 1.3.1899andftntter whether he has been (»idtwo adwmce increments or nat. No order asto costs. —- -- - - Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge f '