IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 51165 of 2007 Date of decision: 28.04.2010 Sanny Sachdeva ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr.Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vikas Malik, AAG, Haryana for the respondent State Mr. N K Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No. 2 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) It is stated by the learned State counsel that the challan has already been filed and the case is pending before the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all the pleas before the trial Court and that the personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial court be also exempted. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Taking into account the facts that the petitioner is working at Meerut whereas, the present FIR has been filed at Rohtak, the personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is exempted. However, the petitioner shall appear as and when required by the trial Court. Disposed of as above. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 28.04.2010 mohan