THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5706 of 2006 Date:04.11.2011 Between: A. Kannbiram (died per LRs) Raj Laxmi and others. ..... Judgment Debtors 3 to 7/petitioners. AND Addomal (died per LRs) Sahijram (died per LRs) Aidas and others. .....Decree Holders/Respondents. The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5706 of 2006 ORDER: The revision is directed against the order of the learned X Additional Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, dated 07-11-2006 in E.P.No.77 of 1983. The Decree-Holders obtained an order from the Execution Court to file draft sale deed. The Judgment-Debtors assail the same in this revision. 2. It would appear that on an identical order passed by the Execution Court once again on 22-07-2009, the Judgment-Debtors preferred CRP No.3777 of 2009 and this Court dismissed the same on 13-04-2010. Sri T.C.D. Shekar, learned counsel for the Judgment-Debtors contended that the orders in CRP No.3777 of 2009 were challenged before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in S.L.P.No.17495 of 2010 and that the Hon’ble Supreme Court directed the parties to maintain status-quo. The learned counsel for the Judgment- Debtors contended that in view of the status-quo orders in the Special Leave Petition, this revision may be kept pending. 3. I am afraid that this revision itself has become infructuous. This revision questions the orders of the Execution Court, dated 07-11-2006. The Execution Court subsequently passed orders on 22-07-2009, whether identical orders or otherwise. Where the Execution Court passed fresh orders on 22-07-2009, the earlier orders of the Execution Court dated 07-11-2006 outlived themselves. They stood merged in the subsequent orders of the Execution Court, dated 22-07-2009. Consequently, the revision challenging the orders of the Execution Court dated 07-11-2006 are not maintainable. 4. Added to it, where the Execution Court merely directed the Decree-Holders to file draft sale deed, I am afraid that the Judgment-Debtors cannot approach the Court for redressal. After the filing of the draft sale deed, the Judgment-Debtors would certainly be at liberty to question the same before the Execution Court and in the event they are not satisfied with the orders of the Execution Court, they would be at liberty to move the revisional Court for redressal. 5. At present, this revision is not maintainable for the above mentioned reasons. This revision consequently is dismissed. No costs. _________________________ JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Date:04.11.2011. mrb