IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10602 of 2011-A Decided on: 8th December, 2011. Man Chand, son of Shri Bhangi Ram, resident of Village jawali, Post Office Mundkhar, Tehsil Bhoranj, District Hamirpur (H.P.), presently posted as Shastri in Govt. Senior Secondary School, Patta, district Hamirpur (H.P.). … Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of H.P., through its Secretary (Education) to the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh Shimla-171002. 2. The Director of Higher Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla. 3. The Deputy Director of Higher Education, Shimla (H.P.). … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to Give the benefits of seniority and increments for the services which the petitioner has rendered on the post of T.G.T. on adhoc basis from 29.9.1986 to 5.6.1987 and the services rendered on tenure basis on the post of Language Teacher from 6.6.1987 to 16.11.1995 with all consequential benefits.” 2 2. The petitioner claims the benefit of increments during the tenure period of service rendered by her and also count the said period for the purpose of pension. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgments of this Court dated 16.12.2010 rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010 titled as Ravi Kumar vs. State of H.P. & others and LPA 36 of 2010 titled as Sita Ram Vs. State of H.P. and others 3. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioner submits that he would file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for her to do so. 4. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter and verify the facts in the light of the judgments referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgments referred to above by the petitioner. 5. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 8th December, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (kck) Judge.