IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1957 of 2009 MD.YUSUF KHAN . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2/ 04/08/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties. A show cause is stated to have been filed on behalf of the opposite parties on 30.4.2010. The same is not available on record. The Court therefore requested the learned counsel for the State to make available his copy for perusal so as not to hold up the proceedings on that ground. The office is directed to trace out the same and place it on record. There was no specific order or direction in the writ petition. The petitioner did not even ask this Court to look into his representation. He only desired a direction to dispose his representation. From the show cause filed it is submitted that the respondents have considered his representation, though the petitioner is dissatisfied with the consideration and has a grievance with certain issues still surviving and have not been disposed. In absence of any specific direction by the Writ Court it is not possible to proceed further in the contempt jurisdiction. If any further grievances survive - 2 - on the disposal of his representation, his remedy lies in a fresh writ application. The application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)