IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25063 of 2011 Anil Ram Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2/ 28th July 2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Unknown criminals have committed robbery on 27.1.2011 where-under so many mobiles, cloth, cash were looted for which instant case has been registered. Submission is that though from Annexure- 2 and 2/A there happens to be recovery of mobile sets alleged to have been on the basis of extra judicial confession of the petitioner but from paragraphs- 53,60 and 61 of the case diary which happens to be Annexure-2B and 2C, IMEI No. shown therein happens to be different from recovered mobile sets. Though learned APP raised objection with regard to prayer for bail of the petitioner, however did not controvert over the deficiency persisting on account of inconsistency amongst with regard to recovered IMEI numbers. Furthermore, there has been specific assertion regarding absence of criminal antecedents. Petitioner happens to be under custody since 16.02.2011. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of 2 the case, the petitioner, Anil Ram is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh in connection with Ghoswari P.S. Case no. 6 of 2011/G.R. No. 113 of 2011. perwez (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)