s'y?ss p R! SiWWiiS, SH / •r-lG^i-" THE HIGH COTMT&DF CHHATHSGASH AT BILASPU3to€.G.) W.P.S. No. * /2006 PETITIONER i*-. RESPONDENTS <" J-- ^J c^ ^'.ae^ i* G"> . Anm Kumar Saha S/o Late Dr. R.P. Saha. Aged about 44 years, assistant Graed II /district Aurvedik Of5ce Kanker Distt. Kanker (C.G.). VERSUS 1. StateofChhattisgarhthrough The secretary healfh and family warfare department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director health services Indian system of medicin and Homyo Pathy, Chhattisgarh at Rjapur (C.G.) 3. District Aurvedik Officey Kanker Distt. Kanker (C.G.). Write Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuing the appropriate writiniiature ofmandamus and certiorari. XI-HC-78 sn^TwR-ti'sb (raTsn^istiHich <-: tdN^TT SbW^l 3^'^raRra', si-rflu'is, Rfcrtiyy __^ f. 3^2C1 Wf 200C 3T1^?Tq?"3? (Ii?^3^8T) ?T(IIWflf?(T3TI^T 26.07.2006 Shri M.K. Dubey, learned Shri Vinay Pandey, advance copy. |counsel for the petitioner. leatned P.L. for the State/respondents, on Heard. ttie By the instant petition order dated 07.07.2006 (Annexi|ire from Kanker to Jashpur. The| seniority list of Assistant Gra(le- However, the petitioner's senio^ therefore, the petitioner is not li^bl as the petitioner has been lifcble fransflsrred Learned counsel for circumstances, the petitioner before respondent No. 1 and representation, to which objection. Having heard learned facts and circumstances of th|e without expressing any opinion learned counsel for the petitione^ is allowed to make a represenl days from today and responde^it wjthin a period of 30 days from] Ehl'Mfd'fl'l wqcff if iSCS <Rl<nil< ^iSrf^ITSTT^r petitioner has challenged his transfer P-5) whereby he has been transferred petitioner is Assistant Grade-tl and the i-11 is being maintained Division-wise. ity list is maintained by Raipur Division, to be transferred outside the Division to Bilaspur Division. |the petitioner submits that in the nnjay be allowed to make a representation he in turn be directed to decide the learn^d counsel for the respondents has no cotinsel for the parties, having regard to the case, having perused the record, and (>n the merits of the case, prayer made by t is just, fair and reasonable, the petitioner (ation before respondent No: 1 within 10 No. 1 is directed to decide the same the date of receipt of the representation P.T.O. ^^^ 'a XI-HC-78 3n^Tw)^rR; craT3n^rshKi'<t) ^.pt-" ^ ffWdT ^»TT<f) 3^-^PTRTir, eitflwis, Rdl+iy . tu- ^. ^ 20(^ 3TT^?T4a<ti (lyi^q^ET) ?TtnWHf^(T3TI^T —2-~ after considering the points rai^ law. In the meantime, till the declsion respect of the petitioner shall renjiain With the direction aforesajd, the petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rule^ ^rafepftq-mtRff ff tec^ TfwsR: ^Tsri^iTsn^r ed by the petitioner, in accordance with ofthe petition the impugned order in stayed. sdf- L.C. Bh&ctOO P.T.O.