IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2011 / 26TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 12984 of 2009(P) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. K.LEELA,W/O BABU TITUS,KRIPA NIVAS, THENGUVILA MANAPURAM,MALAYINKIL.PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. HAVING ALSO V.P.1/626,BATHEL BUNGALOW,PIRAYIL, PEYAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. BABU TITUS.P.OF KRIPA NIVAS,THENGUVILA, MANAPURAM, MALAYINKIL.PO.THIRUVANANTHAPURAM HAVING ALSO V.P.1/626,BATHEL BUNGALOW,PIRAYIL,PEYAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SMT.THANKOM.G SRI.B.S. SURESH KUMAR.. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNION OF INDIA,REP.BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,MINISTRY OF BANKING AFFAIRS,NEW DELHI. 2. TRIVANDRUM CITY CORPORATION REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,CORPORATION OFFICE,TRIVANDRUM. 3. KARAKULAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT,REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,PANCHAYAT OFFICE, KARAKULAM. 4. THE FEDERAL BANK LTD,HEAD OFFICE, FEDERAL TOWERS,BANK JUNCTION,ALUVA. 5. THE BRANCH MANAGER,THE FEDERAL BANK LTD, STATUE BRANCH,FEDERAL TOWERS,STATUE,TRIVANDRUM. 6. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER,THE FEDERAL BANK LTD,STATUE BRANCH, FEDERAL TOWERS,STATUE, TRIVANDRUM. ADV. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE (MANACHIRACKEL) FOR R4-6 SRI.K.J.CHACKOCHAN FOR R4-6 SRI. P.K. MANOJ KUMAR SRI. P. PARAMESWARAN NAIR ASGI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.12984 OF 2009 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of August, 2011 JUDGMENT This writ petition came up before me on 5.8.2011. On that day, I passed the following order: “This writ petition comes up in the defect list today. The defect is that, the petitioners have not produced copies of the writ petition for issuing notice. When the matter was taken up today, none appears for the petitioners. If the petitioners do not cure the defect within one week, the writ petition would stand dismissed for non-prosecution. Post after a week.” The defect still subsists. The petitioners have not taken steps for taking out notice to respondents 1 and 3. When the matter was taken up today, none appears for the petitioners. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd