IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.793 of 2009 RINKU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner: Mrs. Kumari Smita Soni, Advocate. For the State: Mr. A.M.P. Mehta, A.P.P. 04 09.07.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioner calls in question the appellate order dated 04.04.2009 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 60/2009 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner seeking bail on the ground that he has been declared juvenile has been considered and rejected. Petitioner is sole accused in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Sections 420 and 467 of the Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is that he impersonated another person and withdrew a sum of Rs. 5,000/- from the Bank account. Next day he presented himself for depositing a sum of Rs. 5,000/- in his own account. Petitioner made a claim that he is a Juvenile. The Juvenile Board under order dated 06.02.2009 found and held that the petitioner was a Juvenile in terms of the Provisions of the Juvenile Justice ( Care and Protection of Children)Act, 2000. Subsequently, the prayer for bail was rejected by the Board under order dated 27.02.2009 holding that in case of grant of bail to the petitioner, there is every likelihood that he may come in contact with the other known criminals and that would defeat the ends of justice. It is contended that petitioner is in custody since 2 14.01.2009. This court finds from the Appellate order that the lower Appellate court while agreeing with the view/findings of the learned Juvenile Board directed to dispose of the case as early as possible. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the father of the petitioner is prepared to take full responsibilities of the petitioner, in case he is released on bail. He is even prepared to file affidavit that in case it is found that the petitioner is not mending his ways he shall himself approach the court for cancellation of bail whereon it shall be open to the court below to cancel his bail bond and take him into custody. Having considered all aspects of the matter and keeping in view the directions already issued by the learned lower Appellate Court, this court is not inclined to interfere with the order(s). This court, while rejecting the present application observes/directs as under: (i) Let the trial court/Juvenile Board take all endeavors to conclude the trial itself within five months from the date of receipt/communication of the present order in the court below.In case the court below is not able to conclude the trial by examining all the prosecution 3 witnesses, the trial court shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the Satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Court, Gaya in connection with Goraro P.S.Case no. 4/09, G.R.No. 180/09, Juvenile 917( G)/ 2009, subject to the following conditions: (a) One of the bailors shall be the father of the petitioner (b) The father shall file an affidavit in terms of the submissions advanced before this court along with the bail bonds. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)