AB 4113/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Additional P ublic Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the respondent. The applicant, who was refused the privilege of pre-arrest bail earlier vide ord er dated 4th November, 2011 passed in AB No.2521/2011, has filed the present app lication seeking the privilege of pre-arrest bail in connection with Kalaigaon P olice Station Case No.9/2011 registered under Sections 336/312/376/493 IPC, on t he ground that the victim’s version recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. does not support the FIR case. Having regard to the nature of allegation made and also the statement made under Section 164 Cr.P.C. by the victim, which was available in the case diary, this Court, as noticed above, by the earlier order dated 4th November, 2011 rejected the prayer for privilege of pre-arrest bail. The applicant could not demonstrate any new circumstance for filing the second bail application seeking the privile ge of bail. In view of the above, the bail application stands rejected. The applicant may surrender before the appropriate Court and file application se eking regular bail and in the event of filing the said application, the same sha ll definitely be considered in accordance with law and without being influenced by the order passed today.