IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 21ST BHADRA 1929 AS.No. 54 of 1996() ------------------- OS.241/1992 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ATTINGAL .................... APPELLANTS: PLAINTIFFS: ----------- 1. VAHEEJA, D/O.RAMLA BEEVI, CHANTHAVILA VEEDU, PUNNAMOODU, KURAKKANNI DESOM, VARKALA VILLAGE. 2. RAMLA BEEVI, D/O.RAHUMA BEEVI, OF DO. DO. (2ND APPELLANT IS THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER OF THE FIRST APPELLANT) BY ADV. SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN RESPONDENTS: DEFENDANTS & ADDL. DEFENDANTS: ------------- 1. SREEDEVI AMMA, D/O.LEKSHMI AMMA, SHERLY MANDIRAM, PUNNAMOODU, KURAKKANNI DESOM, VARKALA VILLAGE. 2. SAJEEV, S/O.BHASKARA PILLAI, OF DO. DO. DO. 3. RAJEEV, S/O.BHASKARA PILLAI OF DO. DO. DO. 4. SHERLEY, D/O.SREEDEVI AMMA, OF DO. DO. DO. 5. VALSALA KUMARI, D/O.SUBHADRA AMMA, CHANTHAVILA VEEDU, KURAKKANNI DESOM, VARKALA VILLAGE. 6. PURUSHOTHAMAN PILLAI, S/O.GOVINDA PILLAI, CHANTHAVILA VEEDU, KURAKKANNI DESOM, VARKALA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.R.ANILKUMAR THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- A.S.No. 54 of 1996 ------------------------------- Dated this the 12th September, 2007. J U D G M E N T Today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant appeared and sought for further time to pay the balance court fee. In view of the conditional order passed by me on 20.8.2007, the request may not be allowed. The appeal was admitted as early as on 16.1.1996. The balance court fee is not yet paid. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE nj. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- A.S.No. 54 of 1996 J U D G M E N T Dated: 12th September, 2007. -------------------------------