^ l\ Petitioner Respondent^ HieHCOURT OF CHHATTsSGARH AT Review PetltioR iPR} No.5S4 of 2011. ^u- r^ 5^/u Yashwai Gupta, S/o Late Laxminath Gupta, about 58 y@.ars,, R/o Jamulbada, Polsaipara Chowk, Durg,. District-Durg, Chhattisgam. Versus 1. Hiruman Yadav, S/o Budhrurann Yadav, aged aboiit 45 years, resident of near IVIanjhla Dau's Dada, Vlllage Jamul, P.S.-Jamul, Tansil and Dsstrict-Durg, Chhattisgarh, 2. State of Chhaltssgarh through Collector - Durg, District-Durg, Chhattlsgarh. Mr.Ravl Bhagat, counsel for the pet'itloner. fvlr.Sumlt Jhanwar, Panel La'^yer for respondont No2/'Sta.te. (SB: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Shsrma, J.) (20-7-2011) 1. ThJs ES revjsw petition against the ordsr datsd 20.9.2010 passsd fn Second Appeal Nos.89 of 2006 and 90 of 2006, whereby the petitlonQr/appeilant sfter • some argurnonts. nas wlthdrawn the appeai. v^ith Slborty to flle appropnate appiicatlon befors the revenue authorlty under Section 250 of the C.G. Land Revonue Code, 1959 for domarcation ofthe Sand. 2.v Reglstr^ has pointed out tho default that the petjtloner has flled thls review pQtitlora 142 days of Its ijnfiitatlon and-no appllcatlon for condonatlon of delay has beon filed. 3. The has been wlthdrawn by the petltloner wlth to forum, 1 do not flnd any ground for review petition. 4. Consequentiy, petitlon, havlng no ground te tho order 20,9.2010 is to be dismlssed and It Is hereby dlsnisssed. No order as to COSIS. ._-—-—-- Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge