1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4504 OF 2009 (M.S.R.T.C., Nagpur vs. The Additional Commissioner of Labour & Appellate Authority & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. NOVEMBER 27, 2009. Heard finally Mrs. Maldhure, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Dandekar, learned counsel for respondent No.2. Shri Dandekar, learned counsel for respondent No.2 states that figure of Rs.78,089/- mentioned in operative Part (3) of the order dated 31.03.2008 is incorrect and same needs to be substituted by Rs.66,299/-. He points out that the respondent has in the meanwhile withdrawn the entire amount deposited. He, however, states that he was entitled to interest also on amount of Rs.66,299/- and hence the amount in excess withdrawn by him will be required to be adjusted and appropriated towards that interest. The learned counsel for the petitioner is disputing this. She points out that the petitioner may have already paid amount of Rs.59,005/- to the Cooperative Bank towards loan repayment of respondent as per tripartite agreement between the parties. Subject to liberty to the petitioner to recover 2 the amount in excess paid to respondent No.2 in accordance with law, the impugned order is modified to the extent mentioned above. Thus, in operative part clause (3) thereof, figure of Rs.78,089/- is substituted by Rs.66,299/-. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.