IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 17TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 35805 of 2007(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ BENNY.K.K., AGED 39, S/O.KURIAKOSE, RESIDING AT KUZHUVELIPURATH THURUTHEL HOUSE, V.K.C. POST, THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, PIN-682 021. BY ADV. SRI.K.C.ELDHO RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SUB REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, EDAPPALLY. 2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), ERNAKULAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.R.SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/02/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.35805/07 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 31.8.07 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT OF THE EXT.P1 NOTICE. EXT.P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 15.11.2007 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =================== W.P.(C) NO. 35805 OF 2007 K =========================== Dated this the 6 th day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T This writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P3. By Ext.P3, petitioner has been informed by the respondents that in respect of a document that was executed by him in 2006, there has been undervaluation and on that basis, petitioner should pay the deficit stamp duty. It is also informed that if such payment is not made, revenue recovery proceedings will be initiated against him. Petitioner contends that though in Ext.P3, a final determination order is stated to have been passed, no such order has been passed with notice to him and that a copy of such an order also has not been served. It is on this premise this writ petition has been filed. 2. Now that the complaint of the petitioner is regarding the WPC 35805/07 :2 : failure of the respondents in furnishing copy of the order stated to have been passed against the petitioner, I direct that on the production of a copy of this judgment, within ten days thereafter, the 2nd respondent shall furnish a copy of the final order that is stated to have been passed against the petitioner. On receipt of such an order, it would be for the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy of appeal that is available to him and obtain appropriate orders in this matter. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp