(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 394 OF 2011 Sou. Chhabubai w/o. Suresh Mundalik, Age : 49 years, .. Petitioner Occupation : Business, (Original plaintiff/ R/o. Rahata, Taluka : Rahata, decree holder) District : Ahmednagar. versus Usha Anna Targe, Age : 35 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Rahata, .. Respondents Taluka : Rahata, (Original defendants/ District : Ahmednagar, judgment debtors) and others. ....................... Mr. B.N. Palve, Advocate, for the petitioner. ........................ CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 19TH JANUARY 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. (2) 2. In execution, the petitioner / decree holder sought Police protection to continue with activity of construction on suit plot. The executing court found that there was no such judgment and decree in his favour. 3. Mr. B.N. Palve, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, has invited attention to the judgment and decree of which execution is sought. The point No.2 specifically framed in this respect, finds her not entitled to injunction against defendant nos.1 and 2 in suit from creating obstruction in her construction over the suit plot and compound wall. 4. It is obvious that the executing court cannot correct mistake, if any, in that judgment and this Court cannot appreciate such effort. There is no jurisdictional error or perversity with the impugned order. 5. In the result, the petition is dismissed. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp394