..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.352 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra. ..Applicant. Versus Satyabhama V. Kedia and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP, for the Applicant-State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 21st November, 2008. DATED : 21st November, 2008. DATED : 21st November, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned APP for the applicant - State. 2. This revision is directed against the order dated 5th September, 2006 passed below Exh.124 in Special Case No.15 of 2003, whereby accused Nos.28, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 41, 42, 48, 51, 52, 57 and 58 came to be discharged mainly for the offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 465, 466, 467, 468, 477-A, 420 and 409 of Indian Penal Code r/w. Sections 34 and 109 of Indian Penal Code. The said case pertains to A.C.B. Special Case No.15 of 2003 which is pending before the learned Special Judge, ..(2).. Thane. 3. Against discharge of the co-accused i.e. original accused Nos.43 to 46 the State has filed Criminal Revision Application No.63 of 2007. By order dated 27th August, 2007 the said Revision Application came to be rejected by this Court. The learned APP has fairly stated that the case of the present respondents is similar to that of respondent Nos.43 to 46. In this view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. Hence Criminal Revision Application is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)