IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28803 of 2008 GUDDU MIAN S/o- Late Saraffat Mian R/o- Village Selarpur P.S.- Sajurabad, District - Jehanabad Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 10.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 326, 307, 323, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is not named accused. However, during investigation, his name has been added. It is further submitted that petitioner is a co- villager and has been implicated in this case which fact has also been found correct during investigation. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and on perusal of the case diary submits that the witnesses have stated about the complicity of the petitioner. Considering the nature of allegation and the materials brought on record during investigation, I - 2 - am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. Jagdish (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)