IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28085 of 2008 Narendra Kumar Singh & Ors Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 14.09.2011 This application has been preferred against the order dated 12.05.08 passed by Special Judge, Vaishali at Hazipur, in G.R No. 896 of 2004 , Trial No. 674 whereby the petition filed under Section 227 Cr.P.C to discharge the accused petitioner has been rejected. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that from the perusal of the F.I.R, it appears that no case for the offence under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the petitioners. So far as Sections 3(1) (X) of SC/ ST of (P.O.A) is concerned, that has also not been made out against the petitioners from perusal of the F.I.R and the prosecution story does not disclose that the informant was assaulted and humiliated in public place. From the impugned order dated 12.5.08, whereby the application of the accused- petitioners dated 24.3.2007 to discharge them has been rejected, it appears that on perusal of the F.I.R and case diary, specially paragraphs 7, 8, 9 and 17 2 thereof, the Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge-Cum- Special Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur, has come to the conclusion that there is sufficient ground making out a case for the offence under Section 420,406 I.P.C and 3(1) (X) SC/ ST (P.O.A.) Act against the petitioners and, accordingly, he rejected the application of the petitioners. I find nothing in the impugned order to show the abuse of the process of the court. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. Namita ( Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)