IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14858 of 2008 1. Amrit Kant Baranwal, S/O Swami Sharan Barnwal. 2. Sudhir Choudhary, S/O Domand Choudhary. Both residents of Village- Babutola, Police Station- Banka, District-Banka........................................................Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Krishna Mumari Vaidya, S/O Sri Satyanarayan Vaidya, resident of village- Shishubagan, P.S. Raniganj,District- Bardhwan (W. Bengal)...................................................................Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 14.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioners have challenged the order of cognizance dated 14.12.2007 whereby the cognizance has been taken under Sections 482, 483, 120(B), 486, 487 and 420 of the I.P.C. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the charge sheet was submitted against the petitioners and after that the learned S. D. J. M. Banka, on perusal of the record has passed the impugned order. Hence, I am not inclined to interfere at this stage. However, the petitioners if so advised may raise all their contentions at the time of framing of charges if the charges have already not been framed. 2 With this observation, this application is dismissed. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)