VglW WP (S) — Q “Z 3’) / 2011 / Petitioner ,4/ WM wwh In the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilasgur ’ Jayant Kumar Dhar, Aged 47 Yrs. S/ o Late Vishwanath Dhar Near Shiv Complex, PO Pandari (Kapa) Raipur CG Versus / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, thro’ Secretary, Deptt. Of Agriculture, Mantralaya, Raipur. Respondents i Managing V Director, Chhatiisgarh Rajya Krishi Vipnan Board, Raipur. 3. (Deputy Commissioner cum Census Charge Officer, Nagar Palika Nigam, Raipur Petition Under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India (07$ HIGH COURT OF CHHATI‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 479 of2011 Javant Kumar Dhar. PETH‘IONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. ¢ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF 'I‘HE CON STITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish Ix Agnihotxi J. Present: Shri Raja Shanna. Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi? Deputy Govexmnem Advocate for the State/respondent No. 1. Shri Vikrant Singh, Advocate for the respondent N0. 2. ORDER (ORAL) (Passeci on 12m day of Mai; 20 1 1) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue oftransfer, involved in this petition, has come to an end on account of the fact that census work is over. Thus, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. However, the petitioner Wishes to make a representation to the respondent authorities for other consequential benefits. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side have no obj ection. 3. Since there is no prayer for grant ofconsequential benefits in the petition. it is not necessary to grant any pennission to make a representation. Ifthe petitioner Wants to make a representation, he is free to do so. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid Obselyation. il‘so advised, Sd/é Satish K. Agnihotri ix Judge