IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6012 of 2009 1. SHANTI DEVI 2. JAGDISH MISHRA ….. PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ….. OPP. PARTY ----------- 03 14.09.2009 While pressing this application for anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code, it is contended that the petitioners are mother-in-law and father-in-law of the victim. Referring to F.I.R., it is submitted that the deceased died at her maika. The informant in this case is 14 years old brother of the deceased. This Court perused the F.I.R. The deceased had gone to Jalpaiguri and stayed for few days/months at the sasural, where torture was said to have been perpetuated on her. She was thereafter left on a place for Sakri and from there she reached maika, thereafter it is alleged that she consume poison. Having regard to the allegations contained in the F.I.R., this Court is not persuaded that a case for anticipatory bail is made out. Prayer is accordingly rejected. Let the petitioner surrender and apply for regular bail in the court below which shall be 2 considered on its own merit uninfluenced by the present order. P.K. (K.K. Mandal, J.)