HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRL.P.No.5843 of 2011 ORDER: A perusal of the allegations in C.C.No.211 of 2011 on the file of the X-Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, would show that they do disclose an offence of cheque bouncing punishable under Section 138 read with Section 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner raised several pleas to show that the complaint is not maintainable and the petitioner cannot be held guilty of any offence. All these pleas raised fall within the purview of disputed questions of fact and, therefore, cannot be gone into in this petition. Hence the relief for quashing the above case is rejected. 3. Parting with the matter, the learned Counsel for the petitioner requested that the petitioner has got a problem in attending the Court for every date of hearing as he has to look after his company and, therefore, his presence may be dispensed with. In the circumstances, the petitioner can make an application for that relief before the learned Magistrate and as and when such an application is made, the learned Magistrate may dispose of it considering the difficulties expressed by the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is disposed of at the admission stage. _________________________ JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR 21-07-2011 Gsn.