IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 14421 of 2010 Between: Ramesh Chawla ..... PETITIONER AND The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Dy.Commissioner, Hydeabad and another .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 14421 OF 2010 O R D E R : Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent-Corporation. As could be seen from the material available on record, there is no adverse order against the petitioner as on today. What is challenged in this writ petition is only a show cause notice issued by the 1st respondent-Corporation under Section 452 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 calling upon the petitioner to show cause in writing within ten days as to why the building in question should not be removed, if the construction was found unauthorised. In the circumstances, the petitioner ought to have submitted his explanation together with the supporting material before the 1st respondent- Corporation. In case the explanation is not accepted and any adverse is passed, it is always open to the petitioner to challenge the same by working out the appropriate remedy as available under law. Hence, the Writ Petition, which is premature, is hereby dismissed. As the learned counsel for the petitioner states that no explanation has been submitted by the petitioner so far, the petitioner is permitted to submit his explanation to the notice under Section 452 of the Act within one week from today. No costs. ​ ____________ Date: 23.06.2010 G. ROHINI, J Note: Issue CC of order in two days (B/o) Ivd