HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNfflOTM. J. WMT PETITION (S) No. 1818 of 2007 (1) Bhikham Das Sahu, Aged 53 years S/o Shri Chabilal Sahu, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Midle School, Bijabhata, Block Dongargaon, )istrict Rajnandgaon (C.G.) (2) Vijay Kumar Jain, Aged 59 years S/o Shri Premchand Jain, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Midle School, Bijabhata, Block Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) (3) Santosh Kumar Gupte, aged 52 years S/o Shri Shankar Lal Gupte, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Boys Middle School, Dongargaon, lock Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) (4) Bhisham Das Sahu, Aged 41 years S/'o Shri Nohar Das Sahu, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Bholapur, Block Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^- (5) Hari Ram Pujari, Aged 53 years, S/'o Shri Maya Ram Pujari, Head Master, Govt. Middle School, Sikarimahaka, Block Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Ramdas Meshram, Aged 56 years S/o Shri Bhikham Rao Meshram, Head Master Govt. Middle School, Dhawabhata, Block Dongargaon, District, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) (7) Mikal Masih, Aged 57 years S/o Shri Yafcool Masih, Assistant Teacher, Gov-t. Primery School, Naadia, Block Chhur^'a, District, Rajaandgaon (C.G.) --"'1. RESPONDENT8 VERSUS : ;1) The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Ifarough the Secretary, Education & Tribal Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) '2) The District Education OiBcer, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Present: Shri Somkant Venna, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State/Respondents. ¥' (Passed on 28th ofMarch, 2007) Learaed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that Ihe fact and question of law iavolved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporatioii, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents does not coatrovert the said Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in tenns of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification ofthe fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired IT.I. Examination Certificate on their own expenses as per tfae circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and farther whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Amit Sd/- Satish K. Agmhotri Judge -s.vfsziv^l"r~^i^^s^^^s**^"-"^'-^