IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.: 2185 of 2008. Decided on: 28.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Rikhi Ram Thakur. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. None for respondents No. 3 and 4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): As per report of the Registry, the petitioner has expired during the pendency of this petition. No steps have been taken for bringing on record the legal heirs/representatives of the petitioner. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, so also the pending application(s), if any. However, it is left open to the legal heirs/representatives of the petitioner to revive the matter in accordance with law. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 28, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?