IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12011 of 2001 CHANDESHWAR RAM Versus MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 6. 29.7.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. By order dated 23.6.1999 passed in District Saran Revision No. 56 of 1999 as contained in Annexure-3 to this application, the said revision was dismissed on the ground of being barred by limitation as when the said order was passed, the limitation petition, praying inter alia to condone the delay in filing the revision application was not filed. Later the counsel appearing in the revision filed the limitation application and sought recall of the order dismissing the revision but the restoration application was also dismissed under order dated 19.1.2000. 3. Having heard counsel for the parties, I am of the view that in order to do complete justice between the parties, it is necessary that the matter be heard on merit, for such purpose, I set aside the order dated 23.6.1999 as also the order dated 19.1.2000 and remit back the matter to the Board of Revenue to consider the revision application on merits after condoning the delay in filing the revision application and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Parties are directed to appear before the Board of Revenue along with a certified copy of this order on 18.8.2008. The Board of Revenue is requested to consider the matter on merits at the earliest. 4. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha,J.)