1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3406 of 2009 (Viru S.Kanoji (Bhandari) and others vs. The State of Maharashtra) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. R.D.Biradar, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. K.M.Suryawanshi, APP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 9/10/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr.Biradar, Counsel for the applicant. 2. The earlier exercise, by applications Nos.2270/2009, by Santosh Kadam and 2341/2009, by Viru Kanoji is rejected by order dt.21st July, 2009. 3. On identical grounds present application is moved by total four applicants named in the FIR. 2 4. The repeated submissions of criminal antecedents of Ravi will not be a relevant factor for allowing bail in terms of Section 438 Cr.P.C. The injury certificate projects the dismal state of the events as to how Ravi was brutally dealt with. It cannot be said that, based on political vendetta present prosecution is launched. Consequently, discretion in terms of Section 438 of Cr.P.C. is not exercised. Application rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/3406-09crapl