IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25042 of 2008 ARJUN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5 17.12.2008 Despite the observation given by this Court on 23.01.2008, the Court is finding difficulty in enlarging the petitioner on bail because yet another accused Ram Briksh Singh, was allowed bail by this Court earlier has disappeared and is not appearing for trial any more. His bail bond has been cancelled on 11.11.2008, and warrant of arrest has been issued against him. Under these circumstances, the Court is of the opinion that if this petitioner is also enlarged on bail who is chargesheeted in a serious crime, the trial of the case would be frustrated. However, if Ram Briksh Singh is arrested or surrenders before the court then the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail and court will consider the same on its own merit Rajeev/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)