THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.27632 of 2010 DT.09.11.2010 Between: B.Padmanabha Reddy … Petitioner And The A.P.Information Commission, rep.by its Chairman, HACA Bhavan, Opp.Public Garden, Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri.D.L.Pandu Counsel for respondents: Smt.Ch.Vedavani The Court made the following ORDER: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not providing information under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for short ‘the Act’) as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, Sri D.L.Pandu, learned counsel for the petitioner, has fairly conceded that his client has a remedy of approaching respondent No.1 under Section 20 of the Act for non-compliance of the order, dated 07.08.2010, passed by respondent No.1, against respondent Nos.2 and 3. Inasmuch as the petitioner has an efficacious remedy for enforcement of the order already passed by respondent No.1, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach respondent No.1 under Section 20 of the Act. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.35280 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date: 09.11.2010. VGB