IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17289 of 2010 1. MANOJ RAI 2. Ajay Rai 3. Deepak Rai 4. Shyam Rai Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The defence of the petitioners in a Police case under Sections 307 and other provisions of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act is that they are not charge-sheeted when cognizance has been taken differing with the same. Those charge-sheeted has been enlarged on Police bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 246 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)