THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5215, 5216 and 5217 of 2011 Date. 3.12.2011 Between: Panchadula Rama Mohana Rao and others Petitioners And Panchadula Prabhakar and others … Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri N.V. Anantha Krishna Counsel for respondents: The Court made the following ORDER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5215, 5216 and 5217 of 2011 COMMON ORDER: Since the parties are same and the issue raised in these revisions are connected, they are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners herein are plaintiﬀs, they have ﬁled a suit in O S No. 278 of 2005 for partition, wherein they have ﬁled three application in I.A No. 1512 of 2011 to reopen the matter for adducing further evidence for receiving documents; I.A. No. 1513 of 2011 to recall PW1 for marking the documents and for adducing further evidence; and I A No. 1514 of 2011 to grant leave to ﬁle documents by condoning the delay, which were dismissed by separate orders dated 14.11.2011. Hence, the present revisions. Heard the learned counsel for petitioners and perused the material available on record. It is seen that the suit is of the year 2005 and the evidence was closed on 26.4.2010 and in fact once P.W.2 was recalled however documents which are sought to be ﬁled could not be filed. After closure of the evidence of either side when the matter was coming up for arguments, the subject applications were ﬁled and except one document, all other documents which were sought to be ﬁled are subsequent to the ﬁling of the suit alone. Further, no cogent reasons are stated about their relevancy and details as to when the said documents were received and how they are relevant and essential for resolving the controversy etc. In the absence of the same, the Court below has rightly dismissed the said applications and the orders under revision needs no interference from this Court. Accordingly, the revision petitions are dismissed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to file fresh applications with relevant particulars. Accordingly, the revision petitions are dismissed. No costs. _____________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Date: 3.12.2011 tvk Note: CC by 5.12.2011 THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5215, 5216 and 5217 of 2011 Date. 3.12.2011