1 ndm 905 cp.338.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 338 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5187 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Ramesh Ramamurthy for the Petitioner. Mr. Jaydeep S. Deo and S.B.Saetye for Respondent Nos.3 & 5. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 21 st December, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the contesting Respondents. 2 The breach alleged is of the judgment and order dated 22 nd February, 2008 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, which has been confirmed by this Court. In paragraph Nos. 13 and 14 of the reply filed by Mr. N.Raghuraman, General Manager, it is sated that the concerned Respondents are working in furtherance of the directions given to give proper effect to the four grade structure among technical cadre in the Indian Navy as recommended by the 5 th pay commission. It is stated that implementation will have to be made for all the persons working in the Naval Armament Supply Organisation and therefore, the implementation will take reasonable time. 2 3 In view of the aforesaid statements on oath, it is clear that as of today, the relevant directions has not been implemented. However, considering the assurances in the affidavit, as of today, no case is made out to proceed against the Respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. If compliance is not made by the Respondents within a reasonable time, it is always open for the Petitioner to file fresh proceedings inviting attention of the Court to the breaches committed by the Respondents. Subject to what is observed above, petition is disposed of. [ A.S.OKA, J ]