THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4262 of 2009 ORAL ORDER: Heard both sides. 2. This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the tenant challenging the order, dated 28.01.2009, passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge-cum-Appellate Authority under A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, Vijayawada, in R.C.C.M.A.No.180 of 2008, wherein and whereby the order, dated 29.08.2008, passed by the Rent Controller-cum-IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, in R.C.C.No.42 of 2006, was modified. 3. I have perused the impugned order, passed by the Court below, and the material papers on record. 4. The order of eviction was passed on the ground of default as well as sub-lease to the second respondent herein. It appears, both the grounds were established successfully by the first respondent-landlord. Therefore, I feel that there is no reason to interfere with the impugned order, which is well- reasoned, passed by the Court below. 5. However, having regard to the facts and circumstances, particularly, keeping in view the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner-tenant, I feel it expedient to grant a reasonable time to the petitioner to vacate the petition schedule tenanted premises. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted time to vacate the petition schedule premises on or before 15th June 2010, subject to condition that he shall give an undertaking before the Rent Controller-cum-IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, in this regard, within a period of two weeks from today. 7. Subject to the above directions and observations, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA​ 12th March 2010 dr