IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20422 of 2011 Amarjit Pandey @ Amar Kr. Pandey, son of Shri jagarnath Pandey, resident of village – Rup Rahimpur, P.S. – Marhowrah, District – Saran (Chapra). ----- -- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Kapildeo Tiwari, son of Late Saryug Tiwari, resident of village – Gopalpur Kothi, P.S. – Basantpur, District - Siwan. ------ Opposite Party ****** For the petitioner : Brij Kishore Mishra, Adv. For the State : Mr. B. Ram, APP ****** 03. 18.07.2011 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with U.T. No. 104 of 2010 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1668/2008 for the offences under section 304B of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Chapra, Saran. The petitioner being husband of deceased niece of the protest complainant who is named accused. In this case, initially on the information given by the complainant Morhowrah P.S. Case No. 65/2006 was instituted, but, police after investigation finding death of the deceased during delivery of twin female babies, out of whom, one died immediately 2 after birth, but another is alive. But neither in the complaint petitioner nor protest complaint there appears any whisper of such pregnancy and delivery of child. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Chapra, Saran, in connection with U.T. No. 104 of 2010 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1668/2008, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)