IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26681 of 2011 Md. Mister, s/o Sk. Raseed R/o Village Manjhaili, P.S.- Mufassil, Sadar District Purnea … … Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar ….. Opp. Party ----------- For the petitioner :- Mr. Md. Bahauddin, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, A.P.P. 2 02-09-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, is named accused in case with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. Submission is that petitioner intends to resume and continue the matrimonial relationship with his wife i.e. the daughter of the complainant, who is his one and only wife. He has also filed an application seeking restoration of conjugal rights pending before the Family Court, Purnea. To further, strengthen his intention an offer is being made to pay a sum of Rs.500/- (five hundred only) per month by way of interim maintenance to wife of the petitioner, subject to 2 any order on the point by the competent court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of filing an application before the court below, clearly stating such intention as stated above and begin with the payment, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Complaint Case No. 2252 of 2009, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Ashwini/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)