1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 104 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1126 OF 2002 Save Andheri Versova Environment Forum ..Petitioners versus Avinash Sadashiv Kale and Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Raju Morey i/b V.S. Talkute for Petitioners. Me. K.K. Singhvi, Sr. Counsel with Ms. Shobha Ajitkumar for BMC. Mr. Karl Tamboly i/b Harish Joshi for Respondent No.7. Mr. M.H. Chandurkar i/b Vinod Mishra & Co. for Intervenor. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & A. A. SAYED , JJ. DATED : 7TH APRIL, 2010. P.C. 1 Considering that the contempt petition is to be heard along with the Writ Petition, we have taken up the matter for hearing. 2. The contempt petition was moved on the ground that the respondent Corporation has committed breach of the order dated 22nd June, 2006. A Motion thereafter was taken out for variation of the order dated 22nd June, 2006 being Notice of Motion No. 695 of 2006. By order dated 30th March, 2009 the order dated 22nd June, 2006 has been varied in as much as the earlier order to put up a bund on high tide line has been substituted by construction of a barbed wire fencing along with plantation of treeson the 2 H.T.L. To our mind that construction of bund by itself may have affected the tidal movement. Both the parties agree that order requires variation which has subsequently been varied. Nothing therefore, survives in the contempt petition. It is accordingly disposed of. (F.I. REBELLO J.) ( A. A. SAYED, J.)