THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Tr.C.M.P.No.21 of 2010 ORDER: The respondent filed O.S.No.1366 of 2007 in the Court of IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, against the petitioner, for recovery of a sum of Rs.3,00,000/-. The petitioner, on the other hand, filed O.S.No.176 of 2007 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram, for recovery of Rs.1,08,266/-, against the respondent. It is stated that another suit, being O.S.No.491 of 2009, was also filed by the petitioner against the respondent for recovery of Rs.1,72,000/- in the same Court. The petitioner seeks transfer of O.S.No.1366 of 2007 from the Court of IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, to the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram. It is pleaded that there is overlapping of pleadings and contentions in all the three suits and it is better that they are decided by one and the same Court. The petition is opposed by the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. Except that the three suits are for recovery of money, there does not appear to be anything common in them. O.S.No.1366 of 2007 is filed on the basis of certain bank transactions. O.S.No.491 of 2009 is filed on the strength of a promissory note. The basis for O.S.No.176 of 2007 is alleged to be the dishonour of a cheque said to have been issued by the respondent to the petitioner with an endorsement that the account is closed. When the facts are so divergent, clubbing of those suits would lead to its own complication. Therefore, the Tr.C.M.P. is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated:28.06.2010 GJ