IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 4269 of 1990 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.11.2010. Shanti Devi ....Petitioner Versus The Additional Deputy Commissioner, Karnal and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Shri Parveen Chander Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Saini, Sr. D.A.G. Haryana. NAWAB SINGH.J (ORAL) Challenge is to the order dated October 16th, 1987 (Annexure P/3) passed by Additional Deputy Commissioner, Karnal, whereby, he dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner impugning the order of Municipal Committee, Karnal, vide which the annual rental value of the house bearing No. III-289, Mall Road, Karnal was assessed at Rs.14,400/- and for the year 1985-86, house tax levied on it was Rs. 1575/-. The Additional Deputy Commissioner, while dismissing the appeal of the petitioner observed that the house consisted of five rooms, three stores, a kitchen, two verandahs and a garage and was situated in the prime locality of Karnal. Thus, the rental value assessed by the Municipal Committee authorities was not in excess in any manner. In view of the location and size of the petitioner's house, in the considered opinion of this Court, there is no illegality or irregularity in the order (Annexure P/3), dismissing the appeal of the petitioner. Dismissed. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 25.11.2010. som