IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.10822 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 13, 2010. Capt.Joginder Singh and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.H.K.Brinda, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners are aggrieved at the re-constitution of the Rural Education Development Committee of village Bela Ramgarh, District Roopnagar. Reliance is placed upon the Instructions dated 2.6.2010 (Annexure P-10) said to have been issued by the Director General-cum-Project Director, School Education, Punjab, to the effect that no directions were ever issued to reconstitute the entire Committee. The cause of action and nature of relief sought by the first petitioner is totally different then that of petitioner Nos.2 & 3. It appears that no joint writ petition on their behalf is maintainable. However, instead of going into the hyper-technicalities, moroso when the Director General, School Education, Punjab-cum-Project Director is inclined to C.W.P.No .10822 of 2010 2 redress the petitioners' grievances, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to represent before the afore-stated Authority, if already not represented. It is directed that as and when the petitioners represent before the Project Director, their grievances shall be redressed by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Dasti. July 13, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE