1 902 wp 2624.10 group.doc K IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2624 OF 2010 Hitendra Dhanji Gada ...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Mohan T Raheja for petitioner. Mr.M.Sayyed, AGP for respondent no.1/State. Ms.Prachi Purandare for respondent no.2 and 3. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2625 OF 2010 Manilal T Bhanushali ...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Mohan T Raheja for petitioner. Mr.Milind More, AGP for respondent no.1/State. Ms.Prachi Purandare for respondent no.2 and 3. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2626 OF 2010 Rajesh G Dhiliwal ...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Mohan T Raheja for petitioner. Mr.B.Mehta, AGP for respondent no.1/State. Ms.Prachi Purandare for respondent no.2 and 3. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2627 OF 2010 Bhagwatilal G Gokhru ...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. 2 902 wp 2624.10 group.doc Mr.Mohan T Raheja for petitioner. Ms.Anjali Helekar, AGP for respondent no.1/State. Ms.Prachi Purandare for respondent no.2 and 3. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2628 OF 2010 Hasmukh Harilal Shah ...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Mohan T Raheja for petitioner. Ms.Smita Gaidhani, AGP for respondent no.1/State. Ms.Prachi Purandare for respondent no.2 and 3. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2629 OF 2010 Bhupendra Lakhamshi Lodaya ...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Mohan T Raheja for petitioner. Mr.S.S.Joshi, AGP for respondent no.1/State. Ms.Prachi Purandare for respondent no.2 and 3. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2630 OF 2010 Suresh K Palan ...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Mohan T Raheja for petitioner. Mr.J.G.Saluja, AGP for respondent no.1/State. Ms.Prachi Purandare for respondent no.2 and 3. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2631 OF 2010 Vijay Himmailal Doshi & Anr. ...Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. 3 902 wp 2624.10 group.doc Mr.Mohan T Raheja for petitioner. Ms.Uma Palsuledesai, AGP for respondent no.1/State. Ms.Prachi Purandare for respondent no.2 and 3. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2633 OF 2010 Hitesh Dungarshi Shah ...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Mohan T Raheja for petitioner. Mr.A.B.Kelkar, AGP for respondent no.1/State. Ms.Prachi Purandare for respondent no.2 and 3. CORAM : D.K.DESHMUKH & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED : 04/02/2011. PC: 1 These petitions can be disposed of by common order because in all these petitions notice issued under section 53 of the Town Planning Act in relation to the flats in one building of Co-operative Society has been challenged. The learned counsel appearing for the Corporation which has issued the notices states that in case the petitioners make representation against the notices issued to them within a period of seven days from today, those representations will be considered in accordance with the law and disposed of by a reasoned order. Statement is accepted. In view of this statement, petitions are disposed of in following terms: 4 902 wp 2624.10 group.doc i) In case, the Petitioners make written representation to the Executive Engineer (Building Proposal) Eastern Suburban within a period of seven days from today accompanied by any documents on which the Petitioners may like to rely in support of their representation, the Executive Engineer (Building Proposal) Eastern Suburban shall consider that representation in accordance with law and dispose it of by a reasoned order within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation and communicate his decision to the Petitioners. ii) For a period of seven days from today till the Petitioners make representation and in case the representation is made, during the pendency of the representation, no action pursuant to notices challenged in the petitions shall be taken. ii) Petitions are disposed of. (D.K.Deshmukh, J.) (K.K.Tated, J.)