IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-14065 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.9.2010 ... Ombir @ Kala ................Petitioner vs. State of Haryana .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. J.S. Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Shalini Atri, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. ... K.C. Puri, J. As per allegation of the prosecution, petitioner supplied lorpose tablets to Jasbir, who happens to be cousin of Naveen. According to the prosecution Sonam and Naveen have illicit relations and have administered the tablets to 7 persons and thereafter strangulated these persons. The petitioner is in custody since 1.10.2009. The State counsel could not point out any direct evidence from which it can be concluded that petitioner has the knowledge that these tablets are likely to be used for the offence. The State counsel has pointed out the confessional statement of the co-accused Jasbir, but could not convince how that is admissible against the co-accused. So, without commenting on the merits of the case, bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. ( K.C. Puri ) 22.9.2010 Judge chugh