IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.92 OF 2005 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.92 OF 2005 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.92 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax City-V, Mumbai. .. Appellant V/s M/s.B.K.Kapurchand Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.A.S.Rao for the Appellant. Mr.Pramod Vaidya for the Respondent. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 13.01.2006. DATE : 13.01.2006. DATE : 13.01.2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Mr.Rao, the learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the above appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT V/s.Cadell Weaving CIT V/s.Cadell Weaving CIT V/s.Cadell Weaving Mills Co.Ltd. - 273 ITR 1 (SC), Mills Co.Ltd. - 273 ITR 1 (SC), Mills Co.Ltd. - 273 ITR 1 (SC), against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee. The learned Counsel for the Appellant therefore seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal. Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such. 2. Permissible court fees be refunded to the Appellant as per the Rules. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)