-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8342 OF 2011 Chander B. Matta & Anr. ..Petitioners. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Prasad K. Dhakephalkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. V. R. Tripathi i/b V. R. Tripathi & Associates for the petitioners. Mr. N. V. Walawalkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil R. Mishra for R-5A & 5C. Mr. A. I. Patel, AGP for R-1 to 3. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : October 11, 2011. P. C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The petition pertains to the recording of mutation entry. It is settled position of law that the mutation entry does not create or extinguish rights of the party and the same are recorded for the fiscal purposes only. A reference can be made to the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Balwant Singh & Another v/s. Daulat Singh, reported in 1997 (7) SCC 137. srp -: 2 :- 3. Remedy of the parties is to approach the Civil Court to get adjudicated their rights. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to entertain the petition and interfere with the impugned order in writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition is therefore dismissed. 4. In the present case, the petitioners have already filed suit in the Civil Court for declaration and injunction. The said suit will have to be decided independently on its own merits and without being influenced by the order impugned in this writ petition. (RANJIT MORE, J.)