Civil Revision No. 3354 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3354 of 2011 Date of Decision: 20.5.2011 *** Manohar Lal .. Petitioner Vs. Dalbir Kaur & Ors. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. S.S. Godara, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The present petitioner-plaintiff is aggrieved with the order dated 10.5.2011 passed by the Court below by virtue of which the application of defendants No.1 to 4 filed in the suit seeking permission to lead additional evidence by placing on record the mutation No. 948 and orders dated 7.10.1986 and 3.4.1972, has been allowed. Heard. It is evident from the impugned order that the additional evidence which was sought to be produced by way of additional evidence was found significantly important for the proper adjudication of the lis between the parties. Although defendants No.1 to 4 were held to be negligent in producing the same at the time when their evidence was going on, but for that lapse the Court below has adequately compensated the petitioner by granting costs in his favour. That apart, no prejudice is going to be caused to the plaintiff with the allowing of the aforesaid application since he has also been provided with opportunity to rebut the additional evidence. In this view of the matter, there is no illegality or perversity in the impugned order. Dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE May 20, 2011 Jiten