IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2010 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 9858 of 2010(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- GOPALAKRISHNAN, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.PARAMESHWARAN, CHULLIKATTIL HOUSE, P.O.RAMA VARMA PURAM, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.C.A.ANOOP RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY HOME SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIYYOOR POLICE STATION, VIYYOOR. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WOWN EAST, THRISSUR. 4. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VANITHA CELL, THRISSUR. 5. DY.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VANITHA CELL, THRISSUR. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N SUKUMARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT & M.C. HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.9858 of 2010-F ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Basant,J. The petitioner has come to this Court seeking directions to ensure that he is not unnecessarily harassed by the police. According to him, there is a civil dispute between him and one Maya - a relative. At the instance of the said Maya, the police is unnecessarily involving themselves in the civil dispute and are compelling the petitioner to yield to unreasonable terms. Appropriate directions may be issued, it is prayed. 2. The learned Government Pleader, after taking instructions, submits that it is true that a petition has been received against the petitioner from the said Maya. The police are satisfied that there is no criminal offence involved. In the W.P.(C) No.9858 of 2010 -: 2 :- interests of harmony, an attempt was made to explore the possibilities of harmonious settlement of the dispute between the parties. If the petitioner is not interested, the petitioner need not report before the police. The complainant Maya will be directed to take appropriate steps in accordance with law if she has any justifiable grievance. Accepting this submission, the matter may be closed, submits the learned Government Pleader. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was obliged earlier to go before the learned Sessions Judge and seek anticipatory bail. The same was closed vide Ext.P1 order. Even thereafter, unnecessary harassment continues. It is, in these circumstances, that the petitioner was obliged to come before this Court, submits learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Pleader submits that the unambiguous and unequivocal submission may be recorded on behalf of the police that the petitioner shall not hereafter be called to the police station for any matter connected with the said complaint of Maya. We record that submission of the W.P.(C) No.9858 of 2010 -: 3 :- learned Government Pleader and accordingly dismiss this writ petition, as agreed. Sd/- R. BASANT (Judge) Sd/- M.C. HARI RANI (Judge) Nan/ //True Copy// P.S. to Judge