1 3.caw2655.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2655 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1129 OF 1996 Smt. Deepa Dilip Mhatre & anr. ....Applicants. Vs. Pandurang Ganpat Madhavi & ors. ....Respondents Mr. Niranjan Mogre, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. A.R. Pitale i/b. Mr. P.M. Pradhan, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1, 2(1) to 2(5), 3. Mr. S.D.Rayrikar, AGP for Respondent No. 4. CORAM:- GIRISH GODBOLE, J DATED:- DECEMBER 16, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard Mr. Morgre, Advocate for Applicants, Mr. Pitale, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1, 2(1) to 2(5) and 3 and learned AGP for Respondent No. 4. 2. Prayer clause (a) cannot be granted since the Writ Petition is admitted. Hence prayer clause (a) is rejected. 2 3.caw2655.11 3. In so far as prayer clause (b) is concerned, the SDO, Bhivandi shall decide the Application of the Applicants dated 19/3/2010 on its own merits and without being influenced by the interim order which has been passed in this Writ Petition. All rival contentions of the parties in the Application which is now filed before the SDO are kept open. It is clarified that if the SDO grants any permission, such permission will be subject to the final outcome of this Writ Petition. Civil Application is disposed off. (GIRISH GODBOLE, J)