THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.880 of 2011 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed alleging that the respondent has violated the directions issued by this Court in order, dated 09.06.2010 passed in Writ Petition No.10771 of 2010. Petitioner is a retired employee of the District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, a society registered under the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act. This Court while disposing of the Writ Petition, issued directions, which reads as under: “For the aforesaid reasons, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition, directing the respondents to pay to the petitioner, the amounts due to him on account of leave encashment, salary, arrears of salary on account of pay revision, if any, amounts due under GSLI scheme, difference of amount between subsistence allowance and salary during the period of suspension before his retirement. The said amounts shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In view of pendency of proceedings on the application made by the respondents with regard to interest on gratuity, no direction can be given for payment of such amount. On paying the aforesaid amounts, if there is any difference in calculations, it is open for the petitioner to submit a representation to the respondents, and if any such representation is made, respondents shall also look into the same and take appropriate steps accordingly.” It is the case of the petitioner that in spite of such directions, the respondents have willfully and deliberately not paid the amount towards difference in subsistence allowance. The respondent has filed a counter-affidavit. In the counter-affidavit, while denying various allegations of the petitioner, the respondent has given a split of figures of various amounts paid to the petitioner pursuant to the directions of this Court. Particulars, which are furnished with regard to payment of amounts to the petitioner, read as under: S.No. Particulars Date of payment Amount paid in Rs. 1. Leave encashment 27.09.2010 1,35,375.00 2. Salary 27.09.2010 7,279.70 3. A r r e a r Salary of account of pay revision 25.09.2008 8,347.60 4. A m o u n t due under GSLI scheme 27.09.2010 30,685.00 5. Difference subsistence allowance 03.06.2010 26,022.85 It is stated that in addition to the same, incentive of two months salary of Rs.30,514/- and security deposit of Rs.500/- were paid. From the counter-affidavit filed by the respondent, it is clear that certain amounts including the amount towards difference in subsistence allowance to the tune of Rs.26,022.85 ps. have already been paid. In that view of the matter, it cannot be said that the respondent has willfully and deliberately violated the directions issued by this Court so as to proceed further under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The Contempt Case is accordingly dismissed. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner claims that the amount towards difference in subsistence allowance is further payable to him, this will not preclude him from making a representation to the respondent in the light of the directions issued by this Court in order, dated 09.06.2010 passed in Writ Petition No.10771 of 2010, and that if any such representation is filed, I am sure, the respondent will look into the matter and consider the same. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 23rd AUGUST, 2011. kvni