1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.4 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 97 OF 1992 Union Bank of India ...Plaintiff. Vs. Rajkamal Silk Mills Bipin T. Avalni & Ors. ...Defendants. Mr. R.N. Vangani with Mr. S.B. Gore for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 13TH JULY, 2009. P.C.- 1 In a summary suit, the Plaintiff has taken out this chamber summons with prayer to lead the secondary evidence under Section 65(c) of the Indian Evidence Act and also prayed to produce and get exhibited thexerox copies of the original documents referred to an relied upon by the Plaintiff in the above suit. 2 Considering the averments made and the complaint dated 11th December, 2008 (Exhibit “A”) and in the interest of justice to give full opportunity to the parties and as there is no opposition, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)