WP(C) 4830/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr M. Biswas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr N. Hoque, learned Standing Counsel, Irrigation Department appearing for the resp ondents. Considering the grievance raised in the writ petition and as agreed to by the le arned counsel appearing for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner’s case in brief is that while the petitioner was serving as a Senior Assistant in the office of the Assistant Executive Engineer, Tezpur West Sub-Division (Irrigation), Tezpur, he was arrested by the police on 23.4.2010 in connection with CID Police Station Case No. 25/2007 under sections 409/ 406 / 468/ 420/ 120(B) of IPC. The case was registered on the basis of an FIR lodge d by one Sri Someswar Laskar, Inspector of Police, CID, Assam on 28.6.2007 befor e the Officer-in charge, CID P.S., Ulubari, Guwahati, on the basis of enquiry r eport submitted by Chief Secretary, Government of Assam and Chairman of High Pow er Enquiry Committee to the Secretary, Assam Legislative Assembly, Dispur, Guwahati with regard to the irregularities of Bordikrai Irrigation Project, unde r Itakhola Irrigation Division, Tezpur, in the district of Sonitpur, Assam. On the basis of the aforesaid complaint, the petitioner along with one Prasenjit Kumar Pathak, Accounts Officer of State Road Division, Nalbari were arrested o n 23.4.2010. However, the petitioner was granted bail by this Court on 14.5.201 0. The petitioner, thereafter, was placed under suspension with effect from the date of detention as per Rule 6(2) of the Assam Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964. The petitioner, thereafter submitted several representations befor e the respondent authorities requesting to revoke the suspension order and to re instate him in service. Since no order has been passed on the said representatio ns, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. Considering the nature of the case, wherein the petitioner has been arrested, it is for the appropriate authorities to take a decision in the matter as to wheth er the petitioner’s suspension order needs to be revoked or not. Situated thus, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respond ent No. 1 to consider the petitioner’s representation and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by the respondent No. 1, namely, Secretary to the Governme nt of Assam, Irrigation Department. The petitioner may submit a fresh represen tation before the respondent No. 1, if so advised, along with a certified copy o f this order and a copy of the writ petition with the annexures appended thereto .