97 HIGHC^URTOFJUDICATUREATBILASPUI^GHHATTISGA^^ DIVISIONBENGH CQgAM: HON'BLE SHRI H.L. DATTU, C.J. - & HON'BLE SHRI V.K. SHRIVASTAVA, J. WritPeti&on No.215of2001 Petitipner Shyamlal Ahirwar, son of Kheladi Prasad Ahirwgr, aged about 53 years, working as Line Inspector M.P.E.B. resident of village Dhehdhar, Post offlce and Tehsil Teonthar, DistrictRewa, M.P. VEE§U§ F^seondteo^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of HQme Affairs, Mantralaya, D.K. Building, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Commandant, 11 Batalian, Special Armed Foree, Bhilai, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh 3. The Deputy Gommandant, 11 Batalian, Special Armed Force, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhatt'sgarh 4. Superintendent of Potice, Durg, DistriGt Durg, Chhatti^arh 5. Shri Ramwlash Prasad, the Company Commander, 11 Batalian Special Airned Force, Bhitai, distriet Durg, Chhattisgarh Prss_snt: Shri V.R. Tiwari, counsel for the pefitioner. ShriVinayl-larit,Dy.A.G.forttieState/respondents 1to4. None for respondent No.5. ORALORDER fPassedon8ffiMarch, 2007^ The following oral order ofthe Court was passed by H.L. Dattu, CJ. 98 This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking a direction to the respondents to trace the missing person and produce him before this Court. (2) The matter is pending for the last six years before this Court. Respondent No.5 has fried his feturn. In that, he has stated that he has not illegally detained the petitioner's son. The retum filed by respondent No.5 is takenon record. Since thepetitioner's son is not in the custody of respondent No.5 or any other pereon, in our view, no relief can t>e granted to the petitioner at this stage. Therefore.the petition isdisposed of. Orderedaccordingly. (3) ConsequenUy, I.A. Nos. 8638 of 2<»3. 10243 of 20)3 & 2810 of 2004 stand disposed of. ;'YSdA ' ChiefJustice » ..•"•: ''-. f Sd//- V.K.Shrivastava Judge