IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.364 of 2006 SRIKANT SINGH Versus AMRENDAR KUMAR & ORS ----------- 4 2.7.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. This civil revision application is directed against the order dated 17.1.2006 whereby and whereunder amendment in the compromise decree has been allowed. For the reasons mentioned in the impugned order, this Court would take no different view as the findings recorded by the Court below are itself sufficient to indicate that there was a deliberate interpolation in the original decree which was made after its disposal of the suit while the same was preserved in the record room. In that view of the matter, the ends of justice itself required that the decree as originally passed should have been restored and if for that purpose, the Court below has allowed the amendment, the same cannot be said to be vitiated either on account of any material irregularity and/or jurisdictional error which are the only two eventualities for this Court for interfering while exercising power under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Application is dismissed. The Court below is directed to ensure that its last part of the direction in the impugned order dated 17.1.2006 for lodging 2 the First Information Report against the concerned persons of the record room is complied and a report to this effect is also submitted before this Court within a period of six months from today. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)