IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA WRIT PETITION NO : 6982 of 1994 Between: 1.D.Yella Goud S/o.Yella Goud, Lingampet, Nizamabad District. 2.Raja Goud S/o. Linga Goud, Lingampet, Nizamabad District. 3.S.Narsa Goud S/o. Bala Goud, Lingampet, Nizamabad Dist ..... PETITIONERS AND 1.The Superintendent of Excise, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. 2.The Sub-Inspector of Excise, Lingampet Range, Nizamabad District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or direction, preferably writ of mandamus, declaring the impugned suspension order issued by 1st respondent vide Rc.NO.E3/328/94, Dt.26/2/94 in so far as the petitioners are concerned, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.VINAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in this writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. ----------------------- 29TH JULY 2004 D.S.R.VARMA, J KRK To: 1.The Superintendent of Excise, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. 2.The Sub-Inspector of Excise, Lingampet Range, Nizamabad District. 3. Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 4. Two CD copies. 5. One spare.