IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(s1 No. 3 163 /201o PETITIONERS 1. Smt. Modesta Ekka, W/o Late Rajendra Ekka, aged about 49 years, working as Head Master Janpad Primary School, Block— pharasabahar, Distt. Jashpur T’apkara, (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS /, :1 State of Chhattisgarh Through '.— The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, Jashpur, Distt.— Jashpur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block —Pharasabahar Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) Treasury Officer, Treasury Account 85 Pension Jashpur, Distt.—Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA l. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As mentioned in the cau‘se title above. 3a 5$ : Hcn’ble shri Manindra Mohan $F ri-Jasmva, J. 32-Q7-2m 9 Shri Somkant Verma, counse! for Shri Bhaskar Payashi) Pane! Lawyer for the State/reepondents on advance ccpyl Heardl the petitioner. Learned counse! appeanng for petitioner is entitled to benefit 0f two a: ene having passed B.T. i. Degree before it is submitted that the iseue involved ir the present petition is no longer finally decided by the Hen‘ble exene vs. State ef eta a are, ttbmitted that this Court has aiso dated U6-D2-2009 passed in W‘P.(S)l\lol6257 of 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner forther‘draws attentien of this Ceutt to order dated 2 No.124 of 2009: wherein relying upon tt in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and another Wrtt Appeal NoBWQOGQ, dt consideration of the case for grant of circular dated 21-09—1974 issued by thr‘ verification ofthe facts pleaded in the petition Learned counsel for the reaper petttioner would also be considered on tl the petitioner submite that the Nance increments 0n aoceunt of her appointment at her own cost. res integia and the same has been Supreme Court in the case of Ashe 8 awe {at} ewe {ea} 59 2t is further s taken a similar view in his order 3-04-2010 passed int/tint Appeal e judgment of the Supreme Court the order passed by this Court in eotions have been issued for two advance increments as per t State of Madhya Pradesh) atter dents submits that ease ot the ie same lines. / w V s “L L'l WW Wt, 200 ants st hate Han arm mis- swim w (Wt!) martm was WeW d feetW 3? 3W an?“ {n View o e statement ma e abave thl3 petman is finaly dispased of W!th a dlrectxon to the {esp ndent authorities to consuder and decide the claim of the petitioner for g nt of two édvance increments as L per Circular dated 21 09 1974 issued y the State of Madhya Pradeeh after verificatlon of the facts pleaded In he petition Within a period of eight weeks from today “with“: ,V’Nt i M g\.——e\ Sd r. anindra Mohan Qhrivastava ti jadge i Tumane f th l V