1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 1345 OF 2009 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 356 OF 2005. Transport Corporation of India Ltd. ..Applicant/ Org.Petitioner. v/s. M/s. Richardson & Cruddas (1972) Ltd. ..Respondent. .... Mr. Ajay Panicker, for Applicant. Mr. H. N. Walawalkar, for Respondent. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 8TH JANUARY 2010. P.C. This application is taken out by the applicant to direct the department to remove the above company petition from the status “dismissed” as shown in the case details on website of this Court and restore the matter to file. 2. It is pointed out by the learned Advocate appearing for the applicant that in the above company petition a conditional order dated 23rd September 2005 was passed by this Court, requiring the applicant (original petitioner) to file his affidavit of service within two weeks from the date of the said order. The 2 said affidavit proving service was filed by the Advocate for the applicant on 6th October 2005. The office acknowledgment is produced before this Court. The same is also verified and confirmed by the learned Advocate appearing for the respondent. 3. In view thereof, the order is wrongly shown as “Dismissed”. The company application is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Company application is accordingly disposed of. 4. The learned Advocate appearing for the respondent states that the respondent is a sick company and proceedings are pending before the BIFR. In view thereof, place the petition for directions on 15th April 2010. [ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]