IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17087 of 2009 JAMUNA RAI, S/O- KAMALA RAI. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 6. 22.04.2010 Perused the explanation. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 302/201 of Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the first information report and his name was disclosed by witnesses during investigation, but when those witnesses were examined during trial, they did not identify the petitioner. In view of such, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C. V, Chapra, Saran in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 83 of 2006 and Sessions Tr. No. 256 of 2008 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors 2 will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse (iv) The petitioner is directed to be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Saurabh (Anjana Prakash, J.)