(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5174 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5174 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5174 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1452 OF 2005 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1452 OF 2005 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1452 OF 2005 Hirji Gover Gada ...Applicant Versus The Deputy Director of Enforcement and Ors ...Respondents ..... Shri. M. Masand, counsel for the Applicant Shri. Y.R. Mishra with Mr. Masurkar, counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Shri. A. R. Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent No.4. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 5TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 5TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 5TH DECEMBER, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned counsel for Respondents. For the reasons stated in the application, sufficient cause is made out to restore First Appeal No. 1452 of 2005 which came to be dismissed for default by order dated (-2-) 22.11.2005. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide. Hence, civil application made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). Place the above appeal for admission on 14.12.2005. *****