1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1039 OF 2011 Mallikarjun Shankarappa Sambherao ....Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ....Respondents. Mr. K.J. Suryawanshi, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. Vaishali Shinde, AGP for State. CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 21st February, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Contention is Recovery certificate has been issued without knowledge of petitioner. Recovery Certificate is issued in June 2009. Petitioner got its knowledge in December 2009. Petition is filed in December 2010. 2. The learned counsel attempted to show that petitioner has made some payments to his Society namely respondent No. 4 - Aradhana Co- operative Housing Society Ltd. and his society has not made over proportionate payment to Housing Finance Corporation. Further contention is, Housing Finance Corporation or respondent No. 4 has not 2 approached the Assistant Registrar for getting Recovery Certificate. 3. Perusal of Recovery Certificate itself reveals that Housing Finance Corporation directed respondent No. 4 to take steps to recover the loan and as respondent No. 4 did not take those steps ultimately it's District Manager i.e. District Manager of Maharashtra State Co-operative Housing Finance Corporation Ltd. has filed the proceedings. 4. Petitioner has admittedly taken loan and that loan is not taken from Housing Finance Corporation, but from respondent No. 4. Housing Finance Corporation is not giving loan to individual members like petitioner and loan is given only to society like respondent No. 4. Petitioner is not in a position to point out monthly payment of installments even to respondent No. 4 as loan has been borrowed way back in the year 1992. Alleged dispute between him and his society is not sufficient to defeat loan recovery of Housing Finance Corporation. 4. In this situation, I am not inclined to interfere as remedy of filing revision under section 154 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 is available to him. Hence, petition is dismissed. [ B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.] ssc/wp1039.11