IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 115 of 1986 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- MEHTA INDRAVADAN LALJI JAIN Versus OZA MOHANLAL SHANKERLAL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: UNSERVED-EXPIRED (N) for Petitioners No. 1,4 NOTICE SERVED for Petitioners No. 2-3 MR JR NANAVATI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 11/02/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT On the death of Mr. B.H. Mehta, learned advocate for the petitioners, notices were issued to the petitioners. The notice to petitioners no.1 and 4 came back unserved with the report that they had expired. The petitioners no.2 and 3 have been served but they have not entered fresh appearance. The learned counsel for the respondent states that the respondent too had died on 30.09.1992. In the circumstances, the revision application is dismissed. Rule discharged with no order as to costs. ******* hki