IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 2ND AUGUST 2011 / 11TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20992 of 2011(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. DEEPAK.K,S/O.CHANDRAMOHAN.P,AGED 22 YRS, PALEEKARA HOUSE,PALAKKAD,PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678733. 2. SYAMDEEP.C,S/O.RAJENDRAN,AGED 22 YEARS, CHATHAYIL HOUSE,ANAKKARA POST,PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. JIYASH.K.AHAMMED,AGED 22 YEARS, IBRAHIM MANZIL,KOZHIKAD,THIRUVAZHIYAD POST, NEMMARA,PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4. SIJU RAJ,PANIYEL HOUSE,EDAKKARA POST, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR,OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY,CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,PION-673635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,CALICUTY UNIVERSITY.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,PIN-673635. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.20992/11 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUAITON SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS DATED 11.7.11. EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS DATED 11.7.11. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS DATED 11.7.11. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS DATED 11.7.11. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 20992 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 7th Semester examination was declared, petitioners 1 to 3 failed in one paper viz., EEE 702 (Digital Signal Processing) and the 4th petitioner has failed in the paper EEE 701 (Power Electronics). They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 10 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp