Criminal Misc. No. M-17060 of 2011 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Criminal Misc. No. M-17060 of 2011 Date of Decision: 3.6.2011 Parminder Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Jatinder Kumar Puri Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of a direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Ludhiana and respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station Haibowal, Ludhiana, not to harass and maltreat the petitioner and register cases against him in various Police Stations. A perusal of FIR No. 109 dated 29.7.2010 (Annexure P1) registered at Police Station Haibowal, District Ludhiana, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, reveals that the petitioner along with his co-accused was making fictitious sale deeds of various houses and on the basis of those sale deeds, they obtained loan from various banks by mortgaging the houses. It is stated by the counsel for petitioner that once FIR (Annexure P1) has been registered, in all those cases, wherein fictitious sale deed has been allegedly submitted for mortgage, Criminal Misc. No. M-17060 of 2011 2 petitioner be tried in one FIR. It is prayed that no further FIR be registered against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner was asked to refer to Chapter XIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure which relates to jurisdiction of Criminal Courts in Inquiries and Trials, learned counsel has failed to bring his case within the ambit of any of the provisions thereof. This Court cannot comprehend that if the offence has been committed in different areas falling within the jurisdiction of different Police Stations and on different dates/years qua different banks, how all the cases can be tried in one FIR. Needless to say, as and when any subsequent FIR is registered, the petitioner may justify and seek relief that all those FIRs be clubbed in accordance with the provisions of law. Till such a prayer is made, blanket stay, as demanded, cannot be granted in favour of the petitioner. Hence, there is no merit in the present petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge June 3, 2011 “DK”