IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.4312 of 2004 PETITION NO.4312 of 2004 PETITION NO.4312 of 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders Memoranda of Coram appearance, Corut’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders: ------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Jagdish G. Reddy, for the Petitioner Mrs. S.S.Bhende, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Mr. Nitin Jamdar, for Respondent No.2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 29th April, 2005 : 29th April, 2005 : 29th April, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . It is the contention on behalf of the petitioners that in the order passed in review his case was sought to be considered in terms of the order dated 4th September, 2003. His application could not have been rejected on the ground that he is not eligible. 2. The direction of this Court to consider the case of the petitioner has to be read in the context whether the petitioner is entitled to in accordance with law. There is a finding of fact recorded by the Education Officer that the petitioner’s post was not approved. He was not regularly appointed. Considering that no relief can be granted. Petition rejected. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (S.P.KUKDAY, (S.P.KUKDAY, (S.P.KUKDAY, J). J). J).