IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.20673 of 2010 Date of Decision : November 19, 2010. Narsi Ram .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.K.S.Boparai, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.K.D.S.Sidhu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.K.D.S.Sidhu, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to seek any counter reply from respondents at this stage. The petitioner's grievance is that though his appeal titled as Smt.Indro Devi and others versus State of Punjab against the eviction order is said to have been dismissed by the Deputy Commissioner, Patiala vide order dated 11.8.2010, however, its certified copy is yet not made available to him though he has already applied for the same on 19.8.2010. C.W.P.No .20673 of 2010 2 It is alleged that even without supplying the certified copy of the order, the execution proceedings have been initiated thereby depriving the petitioner from his right to assail the said order before an appropriate forum. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Patiala, to instruct the Copying Agency to issue a certified copy of the order dated 11.8.2010 to the petitioner as early as possible but not later than two weeks from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Till then, the petitioner shall not be dispossessed from the subject land. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. November 19, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE