, mm..w9g9m\be$ 2003 11%“m (Wu) Writ Petition under Article 228 of the Constitution of India S.B. HON’BLE SHHI DHIRENDRA MISHRA, J. 30-3-2909:— Shri Sudeep Agrawal, counsel for the petitioner. Shri J.A. Lohani, Central Government Counsel for respondent No1. and 3. Shrl Alok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents No. Heard. Petitioner’s/grievance in tr‘ is petition is that the petitioner has filed a revision petition against order of Annexure—PH dated 15-10-2007 /‘/ i ,. .r wewW‘mw‘ l E 3 2 ,yw l 4 _‘ . K mmw ‘wmm mmm 'Wam fsé *a‘mm m ‘ ’ PETITIONER Shri Belaji Mining Proprietor Dhruv Kumar Agrawai S/o Shri MP. Agrawal, aged about 37 years, R/o Baradwar, District Janjgir-Champa (CG) Versus RESPONDENTS i. The Mines Tribunal, Government of India, - Through the Secretary, Ministry of Mines, Government of india, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 2. The Sate of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department of Mines and Minerals, D.K.S. Eihavan, Raipur (CG) ‘ 3. The Colector,DistrictJanjgir—Champa(CG) mm ’......................-............... faizoo ‘ ~mm(m> mmm‘ *0? w mm 1i¢m *aimm passed byvthe respondent No.2 before the respondent No.1 on 7—1-2008 (Annexure-P/5). The aforesaid ‘revieion has not been decided by the respondent No.1 even after more than 14 months from fiting the same. Learned counsel for the espondent No.1 submits that revision c/ouid not be decided as reply w s awaited from the State Government. However, since then, reply has een received and the revision shall be t disposed of within 8 weeks from he date of production of a copy of this order. in view of the submissi n made by learned counsel for the respondent No.1 ; the instant peti on is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1. to expedite t e hearing of revision petition dated 7—1—2008 and dispose of the s me expeditiously preferably within 8 weeks from the date of productior of a copy of this order/ N ve/ so! Joége / Barve wwWm-Fsms—l 1 [zoos 1,00,000. Xe