Petitimer %§IGH CGU T GF CE%%§ATTESGARH: BILASP$R Writ ?et‘i‘£§qn‘ {‘3} igo. “5&353 Qf 296$ (Wan Prakeeh Gupta @, Ravi Gupta, sio. $hri Janakiai Gupta. aged about 28 years, r/o. ‘Jiiiage Eazarpara Lormi, Tehsii Lormi, District Biiaspur (CG} {at present residirig at Lodhipara Sarkande Biia5pur (6G) Respondems Raju Versus State of Chhattisgar%1 through the Secretarv Fomst Degartment, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raiph; {(38). 2) The Forest Ceriservator, Forest Department, Gifice of Siiasper, Biiaspor Circie. Biiespur, District B3ia$pur {CG}. 3) The Deputy Vanmandai, Adhikari {Auiharise Cificer), Forest $eoartment, Uiiice of Lormi Up Venmano’ai, Biiespur, Circie, LormL District Bilaspur (Cg). 1) {Wrh Pet‘ition under As'iicie 227 of the Constituimn of India.) SB: Hon’ble am. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Presem. Nene fcs' the getmoner. Shy: Vinay Ham, Beguw Advacate Geizeraz for the State. Umi. $RDER On both accasians. none appears nor is any representation made on behaif of the petitioner. The petiiiorier may not be interested in ihe matter. 2) in view of ihe above, the writ petition is eismissed for want of prosecution. Consequentiy, M.W.P.i\io.4211 of 2006 aiso stands dismissed. Sd/- \ Satish K. Agnihotri k Judge The matter is caiied for hearing twice. ‘ 1 i (?essed on this 2M :ie'y of February, 291.13?