IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13150 of 2009 PANKAJ KUMAR @ PANKAJ SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 18.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is the husband who is in custody in relation to the offence under sections 304B/34 of the I.P.C. arising out of Barun P.S. Case No. 131 of 2008. There is sufficient evidence which has been dealt with in the order of the court below for rejecting the prayer of bail of the petitioner. The deceased had 88% injury. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the incident took place while the deceased was cooking and she was taken to hospital after the incident. Learned counsel for the informant submits there is allegation of demand of dowry and torture and the petitioner deserves no mercy because the in-laws has been enlarged on bail. Keeping in mind the nature of allegation against this petitioner which is evident from the order of the court below, the prayer for bail is rejected. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)