IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13142 of 2010 MUNCHUN RAM S/O BANWARI RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 20.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 120B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the informant had lodged a case against the accused persons for kidnapping of her son by the accused persons and learning about it the accused persons got enraged and called the son of the informant, who was later found dead in a field. Considering that the petitioner is in fact an accused in the earlier case is accepted by the petitioner in the supplementary affidavit filed today, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioners’ case shall not be bifurcated for purposes of commitment and framing of charge. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )