.^..^^E S1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITAPPEAL N0. '$- OF 200^^ fARISING OUT OF W.P. fS) N0. 6791/20061 APPELLANT PETITIONER ^ R. S. Dhruv, agedabout 58 years, Son of Shri Manjan Singh Dhruv, Working as an Additional Regional Transport Officer, Ambikapur, DistrictSurguja (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. ^! . ^' L^:-:"?^ -p^^'^3- ^^^ ~ ^"* State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Transport, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Special Secretary, Department of Transport, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Commissioner, Transport, Raipur (C.G.). The Collector, Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G.). L_ .5. Shri S. K. Kanwar, Deputy Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Offjce, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL UNDER RULE 157 (10} OFTHE C.G. HIGH COURT RULES, 2005 XI-HC-78 ^^^1^1^^-,WTf1^^^i^^l^^^ <-( liH.jM lnSb^lch ^^- 6^f/^wii^^w- 3TT^?T^rai|F K^GiI^^^T) 3TT^T oFT f^ri^^ cf^T 3^T^T ^RT^) ,^<nr^K^rfw^TT^T chl^lld41^ W^fr^fe^tJJf^T^ p ;r:?n: ^ 3Tf^q" 3:T^T I ^:JH % ^ ./^ y/^ 'd\ DIVISION BENCH HON'BLE MR. L.C. SHADOO), Ag. CJ. & HON'BLE MR. SUNJL KURIAfe SS^HA. J. kDOOl.Ag.CJ. 07.02.2007 Shri V.K. Pan|dey, coun^et for ttie apj»tl8Hit to4. Shri U.N.S. Dso. Govt. Shri P.P. Sahii, counsel ^dvocaSe, fcr St®Stste/ Respondents No.1 for caveator S.K. Kawar. Heard on admission. This is a writ jappeal fil^d by the appellant agains^ the order daied 11.12.2cx)6 whereby the petitjjaner's writ petition chaltenging his transfer order dated 24.11.2006 (Anne^ure A-1) has been dismissled. We have heard counsefl for the petitioner and have ateo perused thejmpugnedorder.i | | tt is evident that the pe|titioner was transferred after comptetion of 3 years of service at!a given p|ace. More over, it is a wel( settted law that the transfer is an jncidence of Iservice. Untess the fransfer is an ovt-come of mala-fide exerdse or again^t the statutory ru(es, the employee cannot chaltenge the transfer order. | | In that view of the ma^er, we are of the considered opinfon that petitioner has not bjeen at>le |to make out a case to interiere witti the Accordingly, M.W.P.No. dismisse^ jmpugned onler. | The writ appeal is liable|to be dismissed and ft is hereby dismissed at the admission stage itself. Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice 234/2007 for grant of ad interim writ stands Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge