BEFORE THE HIGH CQUROF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURfCHATTISGARH) CQNTEMPT CAS^NO. I nft /2011 APPLICANTS^ ^s^ -^!-^-" ^^* ":\' •3- Smt Sumitra Devi Bhandeker W/o Shri Madhowlal Bhandeker,Ag about43 years, Assistant Teacher, Presently posted at Govemment Primary School, Baihar Block- Arang District- Raipur (C.G.) 2. Ku. Urmila Bargo U.D.T.( Now Smt Chauhan) Agead about 47 years,W/o Shri .R.S.Chauhan, Government "--T' ^ .z' High School, Katora Talab, Block- Raipur (C.G.) Omkar PrasadVerma Aged about 43 years, Astt. Teacher S/o Shri Sadan Lal Venna. Govemment Primary School Sioni Block-Arang, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4. Ku. Pritima Dhurandhar (Now Verma) W/o Shri Yashwant Singh Verma, Aged about 40 years, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Primary School, Shankar Nagar, Khamhrkih, District Raipur (C.G.). . p % ^.^n^ 5. Sahadev Kumar Verma S/o Shri Ganesh Ram Verma Aged about 50 years, Asstt Teacher, Govt Primary School Munagi, block- Arang, District- Raipur (C.G.) 6. Raghunath Verma S/o Shri Teken Verma Aged about 51years, Asstt Teacher, Govt Primary School Munagi:,'Block- Arang, District Raipur(C.G.) 7. Madan Lal Sahu S/o Shri Ramdayal Sahu, Aged about 47 years, Assistant Teacher, Presently posted at Govemment Primary School Kukara, Block Arang, District-Raipur (C.G.) 8.' Pokhan Ram Sahu, S/o Shri Bisru Ram Sahu, Aged 47 years, Assistant Teacher, Presently posted at Govemment Primary School Rasni Block-Arang District-Raipur (C.G.) 9. Narendra Kumar Chnadrakar, S/o Shri Diwakar Prasad Chnadrakar, Aged about 43 years, Assistant Teacher, Presently posted at Govemment Primary School Kukara, Block- Arang, District-Raipur (C.G.) 10. Hendrink Kumar Bangoliya, S/o Late Shri Prasfaanna Kumar Aged about 52 years, Assistant Teacher Govemment Primary School, Nagpura, Block Arang, District- Raipur(C.G.) 11. Smt. Saroj Chandrakar, W/o Shri Sant Kumar Chndmkar, Aged about 55 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt, Primary School, Mandirhasaod, Block Arang Distt- Raipur (C.G.) T' ^te 12. Santosh Kumar DewanganS/o Shri Mohan LalDewangoan Aged about 42 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt Primary School,Rakhi, Block- Arang, District Raipur (C.G.) 13. SailendraSingh Bramhe.S/o Shri Munna Lal Bramhe Aged about 45 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt, Primary School, Kotmbhanth, Blcok-Arang, District-Raipur (C.G.) 14. Manohar Lal Chandrakar S/oShri NathuRam Chandrakar, Aged about 42 years, Asstt. Teacher,Parsada, Block- Arang, District-Raipur (C.G.) 15. Yodhan Singh Dewangan, S/o Shri Gendlal DewanganAged about 43 years, AssttTeacher, Govt. Primary School, Paloud, Blcok- Arang, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS NON- APPLICANTS RESPONDENTS R.P. Mandal, Secretary. School Education Department, Mantraiaya \^ at D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Smt.R.Bamra, District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETTTTON UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTLEMPT OF COURTS ACTJ971 »< sx^rr 3Tr^T-^T ^Jch ^TI^T 9b4-ii<^ ^iia ^^r ^l<41d4, 'ST^m^, [^<ril^ll< 3?T^T ^^^ ^....&d:..&{'^^1 'J^I MW^ll 9^^1<^ 'i^^T' ^?T^?T ^^TT^R'^f^f SB : Hon'ble Shri ManindraMoha 16-03-2011 Shri Ajay Shrivastava, couns|ei for the petitioner. This contempt petition has fc| 'wifepft^f Trw^rf ^ ft^t <f^i^i< '^3^TH3TI^T n Shrivastava. J. een fiied by the petitioners who had filed their petitions either individualiy or ^oilectively and in which, orders have been passed from time to time by the C^ourt allowing those petitions, in terms of order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bhardwai v. Municipal Corporation. Dura and another. {£006(11) MPJR - CG. 961. Learned counsel for the p^titioner submitted that even though the orders have been passed by this| grant of two advance increment^ District Education Officer, Raipur| passed any order in the cases of tj the orders are passed in large num( madea representation to the resp^ ali those teachers in whose favou< Court hoiding the petitioners entitied for ^, subiect to necessary verification, the has not decided those cases, nor has ^e petitioners. He further submits that as |>er of cases, the association of employees ^ndent No.2 for consideration of cases of I, orders have been passed by the Court and iist of those teachers in whos|e favour, orders have been passed, was aiso placed before the District Edu<tation Officer, buttiildate, orders have not been passed. Learned counsei for the petiljioner submits that in all the orders passed in favour of the petitioners, in vario) jointly, the order states that the passed by the Court in the case of that in the case of Yashwant Bhar^ months time to the respondents to| necessary for the Court to pres) |us writ petitions fiied either individualiy or ^etitions are aiiowed in terms of orders |(rashwant Bharadwaj (Supra). He submits ^dwaj (Supra), the Court had granted two Idecjde the case and therefore, jt was not bribe the time iimit in individual cases separately and the District Educati^n Officer was under an obligation to read [^ ^fe-4 XI^HC-22 3T[^T^T ^[ch 3TT^T ^^ict) <Mf^a Deepti ^sr ^iT^n^FT, ^^m^, r°«ni^y ,^...'.'^.:.^.^J 'WWTT^rRlch i^^T' ^RT^T'^TI^R ^rftH -s- the order in that manner and comp|> orders, subjectto verification, within From the representations, wi|ii and which have been piaced on reccti hjghlighted by the petitioner beljore petitioners may file appropriate appl| submit that in terms of order passejd (Supra), the authority is required to c|< months. If the decision is not taken of the order of this Court in the cai months from the date of representat revive this contempt petition. With the aforesaid observatior cbl^(d41-l ^m^f ^ 'f^t "tf^R iT3rf^R3TT^r y with the same by passing appropriate period of two months. ich have been made by the petitioners rd, 1 do not find that this aspect has been respondent No.2. Therefore, the cation before respondent No.2 and may by this Court in Yashwant Bharadwaj icide and pass appropriate orders in two mdorders are not passed in compliance >e of each of the petitioners.within two on, the petitioners wouid be at liberty to is, the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [^ ^fm