IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28977 of 2010 PRANESH KUMAR @ GUDDU KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 20.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no money ever was paid to the petitioner nor any cheque was issued on his behalf. No doubt he was a good friend of complainant and in that continuation he came in contact of his brother-in-law who is a share broker. Some transaction was there in between co-accused Ajay Kumar and the complainant and cheque if any is issued by co-accused Ajay Kumar. Theft is said ornamental. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in Complaint Case No. 321 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)