IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16607 of 2010 1. SHAMBHU PASWAN SON OF FAGUNI PASWAN, 2. BIRENDRA PASWAN, SON OF FAUJDAR PASWAN, 3. BHUKHAL PASWAN SON OF BUDHU PASWAN, 4. BHIKHARI PASWAN, SON OF FAGUNI PASWAN, 5. JANARDAN PASWAN SON OF KHOBHARI PASWAN, 6. CHANDESHWAR PASWAN SON KHOBHARI PASWAN, 7. RAJESH PASWAN SON OF BHAJAN PASWAN, 8. BHUTAN PASWAN, SON OF CHALITAR PASWAN. ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHANDAR P.S. DHAKA, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN. --PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 3 02.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The eight petitioners are named accused in this case out of altogether twenty named persons. Petitioners no.1, 5 and 8 only carry some specific allegation of inflicting injury upon the informant and others but that too simple in nature. Rest carry general allegation. Parties appears to have settled the dispute and compromise petition has been filed. Taking into consideration all such aspects and the informant and other injured appearing as witnesses supporting factum of compromise as also appearing as one of the bailers of the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, the petitioners are 2 directed to be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10, 000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahna, East Champaran, Motihari in Dhaka P.S. Case no. 40 of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date before the court below at least for one year or till disposal of the case whichever is earlier. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad