iPETITIoNER / ARUN KUMAR YADAV S/o Shn Shyém Lal Yadav Aged about 4§ Years Conductor (W/C) Office of the Executlve Engmeer E&M L/M Tubewell & Gate D1V1s10n Water Resources Department Ralpur Res1dent at Khushalpur RAIPUR (CG) RESPONDENTQ : 1. / x i X t State of Chhatti’sgarh, Through : The Secretary, Water Resources Department, . D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, RAIPUR — 492001 (CG) The Engineer-in-Chief VERSUS Water Resources Department ' r Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lines, RAIPUR— 492001 (CG) ' The Chief Englneer (Mahanadr Godawarl Basm) Water Resources Department S R P Chowk Shankar Nagar Road RAIPUR- 492001 (CG) The Executive Engineer E&M, LM, Tube Well & Gate, Div.1 Water Resources Department, RAIPUR — 492001 (CG) The Div1s10nal Jomt Director Treasury, Accounts and Pension C1ty Treasury Offlce G E Road Ghad1 Chowk RAIPUR- 492001. The Sub-D1V1s10nal Officer E&M LM Tube Well & Gate, DIV 1 Water Resources Department RAIPUR 492001 (CG) The Additional Director, Dlrectorate of Treasury, Accounts and Pens1on Chhattlsgarh ” RAIPUR~ 492001 IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITI0N(S)NI.b a /2008 K C CLE 226/227 OF THE' RIT PETITION 'UNDEK ARTI K \‘ h ONSTITUTION OF INDIA. K- w H IGH ¢€DURT OF CHHAYN$€ WRW PETiTiON L g$§ NG HRRH : BILASFUR 5 F i}$ 114 6 28 A iav run Kumar Yai Var/sag Sfm s“ hg s a a C amsam alothef atit etition rm rtic§e'€f27 a the Contitutian of indi iie‘enc, : Hone 3a s . kgnori L p m ox h state. { ‘ sRaaR geRA‘ ‘ Ea iier the pentioner med a writ petition against the same cause a ction as mvoived In the case on hand seekin for the same reilef rpt petition was numbered as W P (S) No 411?:‘24J08 ‘i‘he etition asmisseu on the ground of want of facts and fauiur to f gactwn on 3am Julv, 2698 (Annexure P-Zm Thereafter the etltmrer hais prefea‘red another writ petltwn being W P $3 No 4397/2908 for th ame reiief which was dismissed as withdrawn on 28m Auust 200 Annexure P40) Without any liberty granted to ma etitioner to file a w ' eintmn Thereafter, thrs petition has been med for the se re ‘ 2. T1‘§‘;NE¥ : r J z t {W P Ea: A222 s a) $xng3h w sari ih K mt, J. P atem :-L Shn B P Rae, Advocate for the etatlomer Shra Shashank Thakm! Pane! gaer f «e g i {?assed on thi: 95 day 0f Ma 9m ya m aw is we5 settied that for rhe same relle nd sa cfton writ petition after writ etition cannot b aintain rit petion is not wuthdrawn wrth hbertv to fiie freh r therwrse m s e firs w t W } 3 was dis‘ 'I ft g nsn P ($ No 41 171200 ssed aer havm come to the cociuro :h p so d OI p a doents ' mce, the frrst wrlt petition was fried by the petitioner before thi our tor te same rehef for which the mstant etition has b et efore this Court and second wnt petition was not Withdrawn With hbert o heme t mamarrabte L 4. i it t y Sd atxshK Agmwm " Judg at no cause of action had arisen and the etitioner ai farie t roduce reievnt cum ‘ s 3 s $t h p een me h y to hie a rresh petition before this Court this writ eirtnon min petition is not t é e as not 1 r 4 I, n met resu, the writ; petiion is hereb t missed ‘> } wk i y ?E‘6£ RE’ PONDENTS Q t a g The w p w ‘ d e sh; > ' o p ( e [g s g 8" “ { p rit L p am lief L Ia m \a p e med w ti s w‘t‘ o, the Intant case th t nt ne {oh a, ‘2 l- S e , ,