s> MKi r^i ^ ^ ^' IN THB HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fSlNO. ^^ • / 2010 ^ PETITIONER ^•••9.: ^- ^...'•"^ff^ RESPONDENTS 1. Satya Narayan Rathore, S/o Late Shri Kapil Ram Rathore, aged about 43 years, R/o Tehsil 8s Police Station Sakti, Dist. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) District Collector, Janjgir-Champa (G.G.) Sub-divisional Officer (Revenue) Sub-Diyision Sakti District- Janjgir-Champa(C.G.) WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER 2. 3. y HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR WRII1 PETITION (S) No. 4994 of2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS SatyaNarayan Rathore. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh& Others. €-•' WRIT PE'HTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri ^atish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: Shri Sunil Otwani, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Govemment Advocate with Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Paiael Lawyer forthe State/respondents. ORDERrORAL) (Passed on 16 dayofJune, 2011) 1. , Leamed counsel appearmg for the State/respondents submits that the petitionerhas already continiied at Patwari Halka No. 11, Sakti, District Janjgii'-Champa for more than iiine months on account of interim order gi-anted by this Court 01.09.2010. The State/respondents may be granted libertyto pass appropriate orders keeping in view public interest and adnimistrative exigency. Shii Bhaduri iurther submits that the Statc/respondents shall not insist upon compliance of the impugned order dated 27.08.2010 (Aimexure P/i) in respect ofthe petitioner. 2. At this stage, when no effect could be given to the impugned order dated 27.08.2010 (Annexure P/l) on account ofthe interim order dated 01.09.2010, thus,itis not necessary to go into legality and validity ofthe aforestated impugaed order. 3. In view ofthe above, accordmg to leamed counsel appearmg for tlie petitioner, nothing syn7ives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of No order asto costs. 5. InterimreUefgrantedon01.09.2010isvacated. ^^ibotri Satist Judg< Amit