IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 4TH MAY 2010 / 14TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 13767 of 2010(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- KUCKU VARGHESE, D/O LATE P.P.VARGHESE, PALIKODATH HOUSE, KORATTY P.O., REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SMT. ELIZABETH CHANDY, W/O P.I.CHANDY, VAYALIPARAMBIL HOUSE, NEDUMBASSERRY P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.ABDUL RASHEED SRI.K.A.SHAMSUDEEN SRI.C.MOIDEEN KUTTY SMT.SEEMA.E.GEORGE SMT.V.H.JASMINE RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, CHITTOOR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.M.H.HANIL KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 13767 OF 2010 (U) ===================== Dated this the 4th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T The main grievance is regarding the delay on the part of respondents 3 and 4 to effect mutation in respect of the properties mentioned in Exts.P7 and P8 applications. 2. If as stated by the petitioners, these applications have been received and are pending, it is directed that respondents 3 and 4 shall consider and pass orders on Exts.P7 and P8 respectively. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp