1:) MW; IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BXLASPUR (C .G .) w.P. (s) No. (5(560 /2011 PETITIONER Samay Lal Por’re, Aged abouT 5O year's, S/o Shri Kejur‘am Por’re, Assismm‘ Block Educm‘ion Officer, Pamgar‘h, Black Pamgar‘h, Dis’r’r‘ Janjgir—Chumpa (C.G.) w ( . VER5U$ RESPONDENTS : ,x'l. S‘ruTe of Chhct’risgar‘h Through Secretary, Schoo! Education Deparfmen‘r D.K.S. Bhawun, Raipur (C.G,) 2. The Direc‘ror Public Ins‘rrucfions Ruipur (C.G.) 3. ‘ Dis’rriqf Educa‘rion Officer Janjgir-Champa (66.) Join? DirecTor, Treasury, accounis, pension, Janjgir—Champu (C.6.) wRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TH§ CONsTITUTION OF INDIA 3a W,m, T‘a‘vrmgz r3 . w Pé>w03m } ' WWW 200 mmwhaw WWW WWW§1E€€°IW $3ifcmm SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mohan 'Shrivastava, J. 05-07-201 1 Shri KSPawar, counsel for thé Shri N, Naha Roy, Panel Lawye finally. With the consent of learned c The petitioner is appointed on compieting the probation period of 2 y Learned counsel appearing involved in the case is as to whether, with eitect from the date of initial a; period The issue involved herein was Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in ( others V. State ofM.P. & others), Vi teachers are entitled to regular pay appointment. The matter was taken Leave Petition (Civil) No6892/93 Thi Supreme Court, upholding the decis Teachers/Assistant Teachers are ent initiai appointment. Learned counsel appearing for while considering the same issue Chhattisgarh & Others [VV.P.(S) Nc allowed the petitioners to make a re raising all their grievances and in turr petitioner tr for the State. ounsel for the parties, the matter is heard a fixed pay of Rs.150/-. After successfully ears, he was granted regular pay scale. "or the petitioner submits that the issue the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale pointment or after compietion of probation considered by the Madhya Pradesh State >.A.No.2745i89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 herein, it was held that the similarly situated scale with effect from the date of initial Jp to the Hon‘ble Supreme Court in special a said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble ion of the Tribunal to the effect that the tled to regular pay scale from the date of the petitioner further submits that this Court, n Amar Sai Ram & Others v. State of L4725/2006] by order dated 01/09/2006, 2presentation within a period of ten days, the concerned respondent was directed to em, Wits—FS/mo—z/zot 1—1 ,5o,ooo. ma g0 WWW 1%réfm3? mm.P@>.3mgzoO MW(W)