IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 21737 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 06th December, 2010. Sat Pal Petitioner through Mr. J.S.Cooner, Advocate Versus Financial Commissioner & Ors. Respondents through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner is aggrieved by the appointment of the 4th respondent as Lamberdar of village Harioli, Sub Tehsil Saha, District Ambala. The record reveals that respondent No. 4 was the choice of the Collector, Ambala and his appointment has been further upheld by the Appellate Authority, namely, the Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala as well as by the Financial Commissioner, Haryana. The record further reveals that respondent No. 4 is matriculate; his wife is a Member Panchayat; maintains two accounts with the Post Office and is earning his livelihood through Kiryana shop in the village. He does not suffer from any type of disqualification. No case to interfere with the impugned orders is made out. Dismissed. December 06, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE