1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Appl. No.513/2008 (Suresh Chandra vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 12, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Manish Shishodia, for the petitioner. Mr.Narendra Moolchandani, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the police investigation diary. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in some of the cases, the petitioner has been acquitted. Learned Public Prosecutor has produced the police investigation diary and shown a list of as many as 22 cases instituted against the petitioner. In almost all the cases, the offences against the petitioner are for lurking house trespass or house breaking in night committing theft, dacoity or extortion. The offences for which, the cases have been instituted, are of serious nature. It appears that whenever the petitioner, in earlier cases, was granted bail, he misused the liberty of bail and repeated the commission of similar 2 nature of offence and, therefore, in my view, looking to the nature of offences having been committed by the petitioner earlier, it is highly unsafe for the society to release him on bail. The possibility cannot be ruled out that if the petitioner is released on bail, he would repeat the similar nature of offences. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 439 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-