[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 91/2008 M/s HARI MOHAN HIGH SPEED DIESEL DEALER, UCCHAIN & ANR. Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Date: 04.02.2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. H.S. Bikarwar for the petitioners. Mr. Arun Sharma, Public Prosecutor for the State. **** The petitioners have preferred the instant criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 04.10.2007 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Bayana, District Bharatpur in Criminal Revision No. 10/2006 as also against the order dated 01.08.2005 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bayana in Criminal Case No. 460/2000, whereby the Court below has rejected the applications filed by the petitioners dated 22.04.98 and 21.07.99 for quashing the order of taking cognizance under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act and drop the proceedings against the petitioners. The petitioners moved an application dated 22.04.98 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Bayana for quashing the order of taking cognizance and drop [2] the proceedings on the ground that the Enforcement Officer, Bayana seized 2210 ltr. H.S.D. (Diesel) from the possession of the petitioner but thereafter on 02.11.1994 the State Government issued Gazette Notification S.O. 267, whereby determined the storing quantity of diesel maximum 2500 ltr. at a time by a person other than licenced dealer and at the time of inspection conducted by the Enforcement Officer, this notification was not in force and, therefore, the limit fixed vide notification dated 02.11.1994 is not applicable to the present case. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and upon careful perusal of the orders impugned passed by the Courts below, I find no illegality in the order dated 01.08.2005 passed by the trial Court taking cognizance against the petitioners and also do not find any illegality in the order passed by the Revisional Court dated 04.10.2007 by which the order passed by the trial Court has been upheld and the revision filed by the petitioners has been dismissed. Consequently, the misc. petition fails being devoid of merit and the same is hereby dismissed. (K.S. RATHORE)J. /KKC/ [3] S.B. CRIM. MISC. STAY APPLICATION NO. 46/2008 IN S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 91/2008 M/s HARI MOHAN HIGH SPEED DIESEL DEALER, UCCHAIN & ANR. Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Date: 04.02.2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. H.S. Bikarwar for the petitioners. Mr. Arun Sharma, Public Prosecutor for the State. **** As the main criminal misc. petition has been dismissed today, the stay application also stands dismissed. (K.S. RATHORE)J. /KKC/