1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6656 OF 2010 (Santosh Kishanrao Karhale & Anr. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. G.A. Gadhe, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for R. 1 and 2. Mr. V.D. Gunale, Advocate for interveners. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED : 15th October, 2010. PER COURT : 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to withdraw the petition with further liberty to file representation before respondent No. 2. 2. The learned counsel for the intervenors vehemently opposes the prayer, on the ground that the petitioners have suppressed various material facts from this Court. When the petitioners do not want to press the petition and seek liberty to withdraw the petition, they cannot be compelled to prosecute the petition against their wishes and only at the instance of interveners. 3. The petition is, therefore, disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. In the event, any representation is 2 made to the respondent No. 2 by the petitioners, the same would be considered in accordance with law within reasonable period. In the event, if present interveners make an application in that proceedings filed before the respondent No. 2, the same would be considered in accordance with law. [ A. A. SAYED ] [ B. R. GAVAI ] Judge Judge ssc/wp6656.10