.»^' ^>^:-^^ ^ u BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURICHHAmSGARH) WRIT PETITION N0.2> 3 ^ ^ /2002 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH : DIRECTOR GENERAL, POLICE, HEAD QUARTER, RAIPUR, DISTRICT - RAIPUR (.CHHATTISGARH). 2. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, SPECIAL ARMED FORCE (CHHATTISGARH ARMED POttCffi) 32 BUNGALOW, BHILAI, DISTRICT - DURG (CHHATTISGARH). DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, SPECIAL ARMAL FORCE (CHHATTISGARH ARMED POLICE) 32, BUNGALOW, BHILAI, DISTRICT - DURG (CHHATTISGARH). 4. COMMANDANT, FIRST BATTALI9N, CHHATTISGARH ARMED POLICE, BHILAI, DISTRICT - DURG (CHHATTISGARH). VERSUS DUDHNATH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/0. LATE MANSHARAM, RETIRED COTWABLE (G.D.) N0. 213, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KATUL BOD, NEAR SAKET COLONY, OPPOSITE LINE, BHILAI 49002Z,, DISTRICT - DURG (CHHAmSGARH). RESPONDENT WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA On behalf of the petitioners it is respectfully submitted as under:- ilF Xi-HC-22 illll SII^T^I K-fi* 3fI^T g?:iN?'^ftci 's^ •^wmii, 's^ftwTS, (sidi'H^ I^Lf 3TI^?T IR^? •WRWTw*ira» 7'^T, 200' Rl'tK^T' an^i'renwo^t 14-5-2004 Shri U.N.S. State/petltioners. Deo. Shri Vivck Shamia, Adi Heord. This petition under Ar India has been preferrcd bei 27-8-2002 passed by the wherebv the Adininistrative T pay tlie subsisleiice allowair wit.hin a period of fwo month' Daid the subsistence allowan Counsel for bofh the allowancc for the pcriod frc^ alreacly been paid. Stul Deo, learned Gov^ poiat out any iUegality nor over it ha.s been made d. tM^ta-^i 4wcii''^T$1^ <r^^i< •^ aiNH snta Govt. Advocate for the ocatc for rcspondcnt. tlcle 2'27 of the Constitution of bg' aggrieved by the order dated State Administrative Tribuiial kibunal directed fhe petitioner to ;e from 25-7-2000 lo 28-4-2001 >, if the responclent has not heen ce for the above oeriod. )arties*subniit that subsistence m 24-9-1999 to 25-7-2000 has Advocate has not been able to bnv iniu'm.itv' in the order. More ;ar ia the order that if the - l/- [^^W A.UJNBU.UJlUl.l. Xi-HC-22 311^1'^1 'f^^an^i ^^ ^ilia iltifci £/- aistBs^ c^ 'S^'^WKPf, Bfll^'IG, 3TT^T •W5R »<r»)mflitfrai '^ 200 fq^T' sii^iwnwHfta subsistencR allowance has no then he be paid. The order w^a f^r* 1^/^Tl'"1 ^l-i^^ -T4?2y'i"'i^s Qn/^ T'^r^ 1U1 UUtll U.1C pfcU'liC& cU.lU lCpj Detitloners herein. This writ petition has order, when the matter is et rlta^appears lliat opportui|] the 'T'ribunal but reply was n^: is noted that on 23-6-2003 w] this Court, the Qovt. Advocat^ ueriod was froin '24& Noveituber uist.ead of peilod froiu 25f11 Ju Having thus considered oassed bv the Tribunal in Article 227 oftKe Constitutio The oetition folls and s4 cnitit<ri<ilTt ^wcir "^ f^'<;1 <[o(^,l< ^; 3ifTO3IT^I |f. been paid for t.lie said period, pagsed after hearuig coiuisel was not Qled on behalf of the Ibeen Qled agaiiist an mterini P pending. Frora fhe iinpugned |ilty for fillng reply was glven by tit filed. On perusal of record, it lieti the matter was Usted before submitted that tfae suspension 1999 to 25A July 2000 |.y 200Q lo 28th Apiit 20Q1. in the opinion of this Court, no ase for mterference in the lifipugned order dated 27-8-2002 I exercise of jurisdiction under of India is inade out. ne le Sd/- 'Acting ChiefJustice Sd/- 1-.C. Bhado!- Judge fTye? ^iiaii