F f EEE $FE§£ é? §§mé 5%; i? EEEE? gig $3? ‘3‘ é}? Egg? é m tila "lir x.” EI ‘ 1C... 'gga {m rm “t "I witt: . EE? 5i “EQEE Eriéfi V? i“? THTF3 §§EEE§ iEEgE? *3 EFE; jgEiEa§€3 g§i§£$?§ é 1‘1 3. .J E i: 5"E’§E§?§é§?§ {EE' EEEE? F€I§E ‘E%§§.§QE€?E ‘j? EP?§€€§§E§J% E§E§E=§ £§§5E$E£E1§ l “ é 1"kt mjkall Bari. age& (mam 58 yearss, wwe w gshwani Kama: smack, aim y. 3-. * warm. w gnasen‘h wo‘ Wnage xayaxh §m$% $h£nkargazh, wsw‘ mlamba§ (mm) . Rm magi; 3mm; agea ahm‘k Q9 geaxs, wk, saw 9.3:: skaxw: am. wnagp aijaguh imagu arm wam. a§jayu£ £G.G.) ma} mama warm, waa about 4a yeam. 5/0; p,$g$harma, a/ca. aw: whkw; mags 9££9cw Gfaam new, Jagdamurg w's‘mf?c% gasw $343.: . Balatéra Kama: Shanna, age& aboui 46-yeasa. s/a.¢zme ms. shaxmm/m vinageaawawr, man, and wsmiw afjapuz gas.) . mun KW $hama. aga& aham éé years. sim gwse P‘ s. Shauna, we. Wilage 33 §apmm Tiths ”'1 aim 8 mt. w a§§azau£ {¢.$.) 1-. 3,. iuE. . HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPé WRIT PE’HTION N0. 1008 {E2006 PETITIONER : RS. Shanna (Dead) Through Legai Heirs Rajkail Bai.& Othem. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Han’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihotriul. Shri Vishnu Koshta, Advocate for the petitioners. ?resent: Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General fer the State/ responeents. Shri P.A1"un Prasad, Divisional Forest Omcer, Bijapur, presen in person. ORDER g ORAL) (Passed on 18 day of January, 2011) 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to disburse the petitioner’s retrial dues and to fix his r pension with immediate effect. 2. Pursuant to the order dated 23.11.2010, Shri PAnm Prasa¢ Divisional Forest Officer. Bijapur, is present in person. He submits that the pension of Shri P.S.Shamia, would be settled as early as possible, preferably within a period ofthree weeks and the same shall be released, thereafter, in accordance with law, at the earliest, within a thither period ofthree weeks. Ifthe petitioners intend to submit some documents or representation, the petitioners are h‘ee to do so, Within a period of 10 days so that while determining the pensionary benefits, the same may be considered in accordance with law, and appropriate orders may be passed. 3. 1n View ofthe above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with! the atbrestated observation and direction. Sd/— V Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ’_’_/__,_’_l Amit L t t