IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28281 of 2008 MD.ISA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is to the effect that this petitioner was also a party in connection with demand of dowry and serious torture on the deceased who was pregnant. Further allegation is to the effect that this petitioner alongwith the other co-accused did not want that the daughter of the informant who was carrying a four months pregnancy, to get treatment. Further allegation is that this petitioner prevailed the informant in taking the doctor for treatment where the deceased remained waiting for three hours but could not get treatment and, as such, was taken to D.M.C.H. for treatment. This petitioner alongwith the co-accused prevailed and managed that the deceased was not being treated and later on died on 1.05.2007 at her parents’ place. Learned counsel for the State submits that the - 2 - allegations against the petitioner are serious and heinous in nature. Considering the submission of the parties and the allegation in the FIR as well as the complaint as contained in Annexure-2, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the same is rejected. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)