IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15485 of 2010 1. AJAY SINGH S/O LATE RAMJEE SINGH @ DAU SINGH 2. RAM SAMAJH SINGH @ MANTU SINGH 3. VIKASH RAMJAN @ SANTU SINGH BOTH S/O SAKHAIYA SINGH ALL R/O VILLAGE SEDAHA P.S. TARARI DISTRICT BHOJPUR, ARRAH ………………… Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. JITENDRA PRASAD SINGH @ JITENDRA KUMAR SINGH S/O KAMESHWAR PRASAD SINGH PERMANENT R/O VILLAGE SEDAHA P.S. TARARI DISTRICT BHOJPUR AT PRESENT KEN COOPERATIVE PALIROAD DIHARI P.S. DIHARI DISTRICT- ROHTAS ……………….Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 03.01.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 8.2.2010 passed by the learned 6th Additional Session Judge, Rohtas in Session Trial No. 2/09 by which he has refused to discharge the petitioners. The learned counsel for the petitioner has sought discharge on the ground that initially the doctor had opined that the injuries was simple but later on it was converted to grievous injuries. Further contention of the petitioners is that the occurrence arose out of a land dispute and no arms were used in the prosecution and, therefore, no offence under Section 307 I.P.C. would be made out, I am unable to appreciate the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners, since these cannot be reasons for discharge. The application stands dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )