IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-23305 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: August 03, 2011 Bikramjit Singh and another …..Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.A.A.Pathak, Advocate for the petitioners .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) This is a petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners and their family members and to direct registration of a case against them for commission of certain cognizable offences. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that respondents No.4 to 6 are land grabbers and they are in the habit of taking illegal possession of land in Ludhiana. Thus, action needs to be taken against them. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The averments made in the petition are totally vague and general in nature. In case any cognizable offence is made out, the petitioners have an effective remedy by way of complaint or application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. as laid down in Sakiri Vasu vs. State of U.P. and others (SC), 2008(1) R.C.R. (Crl.) 392. There is nothing on record to show that petitioners have any threat to their life and liberty. This court, therefore, does not deem it fit to issue any direction at this stage. Dismissed. August 03, 2011 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE