IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2008 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 12085 of 2008(L) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- USHAKUMARI.T.P., MANAKKOTTIL HOUSE, IRUMPAYAM P.O., THALAYOLAPARAMBU (VIA), PIN 686605. BY ADV. SRI.POLY MATHAI SRI.P.CHELLAPPAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OFFICE, MALAPPURAM. 3. THE KERALA STATE WOMAN'S DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRIVANDRUM. 4. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM (RULES) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS, SC, KPSC - R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BINOY CHANDRAN -R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 12085 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 11th April, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner had undergone the Course in Computer Application and DTP conducted by the 3rd respondent. It is reported that identical matter was decided in W.P. (C ) No.6404 of 2008, wherein, this Court was held that the course conducted by the 3rd respondent has not been treated as equivalent by the respondents 1 and 2. I do not find any reason to disagree with the view taken in the above matter. Therefore, the writ petition is, dismissed. (T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) ma K.THANKAPPAN,J CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999 ORDER 25th May, 2007 Common issues are raised for consideration in all these writ petitions. Reference is made to the facts in Writ Petition No.4562/2008 for the sake of convenience.