•^» "'&. s'wifi^ F RFKHi ilS^lal.S- Ci-E-a^Bs. <" l^ {-ool^- (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (S} N0.5~<'s%r/2006 PETITIONER .^.^ ^..••^>- ^•^•/ Ku. Shahena Parveen ^ D/o Shri IjharAhmed Faruqui, Ageabout41 years.Asstt.Teacher, ^ \'y'S,?- Govt.Girls Middle School, Kharora, Block - Tilda, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) <°': "^'^ •<'•' <^,^" RESP^NDENTS VERSUS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, School Education DepartmentMinistry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer /^ Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioner most humbly submit as under:- HI6H COURTOF CHHATTTSSARH AT BILASPUR :-£ Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Re^ondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Re^ondents W. P. (5} No. 5623 of 2006 Smt. Ishwari Pandey Versus State 6ovt.of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. (S) No. 5624 of 2006 Ku. Sushila Verma Versus State 6ovt. of Chhdtt'isgarh & another W. P. (S) No. 5625 of 2006 Ku. Shaheno Parveen Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh A another W. P. (5) No. 5626 of 2006 Rajendra Prasad 5oni Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another W. P.(S)No. 5627 of 2006 Tok Singh Verma Versus State <5ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another W. P. (5) No. 5628 of 2006 Ramgopal Chaturvedi Versus State 6ovt. of Chhottisgarh <S onother W. P. (S) No. S629 of 2006 Smt. Sandhya Sharma Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh <S another W. P. (S) No. 5630 of 2006 Rakesh Kumar 5ahu Versus State 6oyt. of Chhattisgarh & ario-ther W. P. (S) No. 5631 of 2006 Versus Lakhan Lal Patel State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & another Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents W. P. (5) No. 5632 of 2006 Ku. Jeera Padhyoy Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & another And W. P. (S} No. 5633 of 2006 Sagar Ram Dahariya Versus State Govt. of Chhattisgarh <& another Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Shri AJay Shrivastava, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advocate for respondents/State. ORDER 'L. ••.. >th (13tft October. 2006) 1. Leamed counset appearing for the petitioners submits that while working as Assistant Teachers. the petitioners howe gone on training to improve their. qualifications on their own expenses and acquired B. Ed./B.TJ. Examination Certificate. 2. The present writ petitions, being W.P.(5) Nos. 5623/2006, 5624/2006.5625/2006,5626/2006,5627/2006,5628/2006. 5629/2006, 5630/2006, 5631/2006, 5632/2006 and 5633/2006 involve similar focts and common question of law. Thus, these petitions are being disposed of by this common or-der. 3. According to learned counsel for the petitioners, -t+ie petitioners are entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, tiurg and another {2006 CEI) MPJR-C6 96}. Tliis CourT in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg asnd another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B.Ed./B.T.I. Examination Certificate on his own expenses, are covered by the circular dated 24.12.98 issued by the State Sovemment of Madhya Pradesh. Leamed counsel for the petitioners further submits that -rtie facts and question of faw involved in the present cases are squorely covered by decision of this Court in the case of yashwant fomar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, t>urg and another (Supra), to which teamed counsel oppearing for the respondents fairly concedes and agrees with the averment mdde by learned counsel appearing for the petjtioners. Accordingly, the writ petitions are atlowed in terms of the order possed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.TJ. Examination Certificate on their own expenses or not. No order as to costs. A copy of this order be placed on record of other connected writ petitions. 5ubhash Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge