dgm gm gm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.4086 OF 2007 PETITION NO.4086 OF 2007 PETITION NO.4086 OF 2007 WITH WITH WITH W.P. W.P. W.P. NO.4111 OF 2007 NO.4111 OF 2007 NO.4111 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.Chandra Naik for the Petitioner. Mr.R.S.Dave i/by.M/s.N.N.Vaishnava & Co. for respondents 2 and 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 13th October, 2008. : 13th October, 2008. : 13th October, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the courts below whereby considering the material available on record and on undisputed position that the applicant is the co-owner of the property in question. In view of this, I see there is no reason to interfere with the said order. Such person is necessary party for all the purposes. Both the petitions are accordingly dismissed. ( 2 ) Time is extended to the petitioner for carrying out the amendment for four weeks. [ ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.]