...«.—^-&sc'1 p,essnts!1^5R'^^^..........- d...—••—•""' sirad& llensK ^^r^vw '"''' datsi! ^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAim AT BILASPUR c liN ifOCf p.lNC poti :GB3 ^ .A' WRIT PETITION (S) No. : _ -ti ^l 9 . |^ ^, Petitioner: Smt-Zakiya Khan/ W/o Late Shri Abdul Samad Khan, aged about 58 years, Lower Division Teacher, J.R. Dani girls H.S. School, Resident of behind Maszid, Chhota para, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Respondents: ^ •-J (1) StateofChhattisgarh Through . The Secretaiy, School Education Department, DKS, Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (2) Director ofPublic Instmctions, State, ofChliattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) (3) Joint Director ofEducation District Raipur (C.G.) (4) Deputy Director, Education, Raipur/ district. Raipur C.G. (5) Principal, J.R. Dani Girls H.S. School, Raipur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OE TFIE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FORISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS, ORDERS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARIS. XI-HC-78 *11*f^l arH w 3ST •^wic[<i, ttTfl+l'16, fsldltfy ^j^> ^..w.:.-i..:n-..is.^.'^ 200^ 3iiS<;l i^ach (l?it^ci<<.ff) 3n^T?iTR-fi'sb creT3n^Tsb*< \." l.<''r STBTWHfgcT-Sn^T 2|4- eff4ct wher4os l-9-20)6 Mr. Manoj KumarDube, couns| Mr. Vinay Pandey, Panel Lawy^r copy. l-lecrd. The case of the petitioner i^ and as per the Instruction dated 2|4- Assistant Teachers who have pass^d their own expenses after 22-10-64| The petitioner passed the B.T.I. copy of the mark sheet to that not been given the benefit, gronted t«Bo advance increments ur( Court. Having heard learned counsel ond circumstances of the case, with( the case, the petitioner' is allowed tc| a copy of this petition cnd jts respondent No.2 within a period of No.2 is directed to examine the averments mode by the petitior(er representation also. If responde^ similarly situated persons have incr'ements ond the petitioner-'s cas^ increments on the basis of fiovernmeht's °tii<iTn<fl-< *iitidTffte<^t<R]«i< ^sri^iTsn^T for the petitioner. er for- the State/respondents, on advance that she is workin9 as Assistant Teacher 2|4-12-98 issued by the State of M.P., the ss^d B.T.1., B.Ed. and M.Ed. examination on are entitled for two advance increments. exlamination on her own cost in 1990-91 and is Annexure P-2, but the petitioner has i, similar'ly situated persons hwe been (der the orders of the Tr-ibunai ond this 3|5 cdse for- the porties, having regard to the facts aut expressing any opinion on the merit of make a detoiled representation aiong with annexures raisirg nl 1 her grievonces to days from todcy <nd in turn,respondent of the petitioner in the light of the in this writ petition and in the ^t No.2 reaches to the conclusion thot ^een granted benefit of t»»o advance is also covered for 9ront of two advance ^it's order, then respondent No.2 shall pass PJ.O. XI-HC-78 an^rwR^i* craT3I^Tsbt|i+ Soma v ^ /^~\ (Z£s^ *11<1^T$h*1T9> ^sf '^ww<t, WT^V'W, Rldlti^<. ^.T5. ^7r?/ ...-.-...'. . .-. .-V. .'.'. < ^.. ^. 2QoX 9ll^l4ach (yil^isx^ff) ronwtrfgcTsn^T 2--1- °ni<lfa<(1-l WRtf fffS^t <R|+AI< ^ari^riTgn^T order on the representation of 1^ie petitioner within a period of 3 months from the date of its receipt, in oe.cordfmce with law. With the directions ofor-^said, the petition stands disposed of. Parties ore entitled for c4rtified copy of this order. L.C.Bhadoo Judge -# P.T.O.