1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 6354 of 2004 Kachru Kashinath Bhagre & ors. .. Petitioners versus Shivram Namdeo Kushare & ors. .. Respondents ... Mr.P.S. Dani for the petitioners. Mr.S.M. Sabrad for the respondent. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 16th February 2006. DATED : 16th February 2006. DATED : 16th February 2006. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The dispute was filed by the respondent against the petitioner under the Mamlatdar Courts Act 1906. A revision against the decision of the Mamlatdar has been dismissed. The finding of the Mamlatdar and 2 the revisional authority are concurrent. No interference is called for in exercise of a writ jurisdiction as the findings are not shown to be perverse. 3. Hence, Writ Petition is rejected. (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J)