IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2009 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 27722 of 2003(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MAMBAD PAZHAYA JAMA-ATH PALLI, PARIPALANA SANGHAM, COMMITTEE, @ MAMBAD VALIYA JAMA-ATH PALLI COMMITTEE, MAMBAD REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY, PROF.P.ABDULLA. BY ADV. SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. LAND TRIBUNAL, MANJERY. 2. KERALA WAKF BOARD, PARAMARA ROAD, ERNAKULAM NORTH. 3. SPECIAL REVENUE INSPECTOR (LR), MANJERY. 4. SAINABHA, D/O.KONDOTTIPALLIPARAMBIL AYSHA, BEHIND G.K.ENTERPRISES, P.O.NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. NAJARUMA, D/O.KONDOTTI PALLIPARAMBIL AYSHA, BEHIND G.K.ENTERPRISES, P.O.NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. RAZIYA, D/O.KONDOTTI PALLIPARAMBIL AYSHA, BEHIND G.K.ENTERPRISES, P.O.NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 7. K.P.AHAMMED KOYA, KONDOTTI PALLIPARAMBIL CHANDAPPADI, P.O.TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 8. K.P.ABDULRAHIMAN, KONDOTTI PALLIPARAMBIL, CHANDAPADI, P.O.TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM DIST. 9. K.P.HAMZA, KONDOTTI PALLIPARAMBIL, P.O.TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.P.A.ABDUL JABBAR, SC, WAKF BOARD FOR R2 SRI.M.M.SAIDU MUHAMMED,SC,WAKF BOARD FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO. S.M. 471/75 DATED 2.8.2003 ISSUED BY THE SPECIAL REVENUE INSPECTOR (LR) MANJERY. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 8.8.2003 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE. C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.C. NO. 27722 OF 2003 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT W.P.C. is filed six years back challenging a notice issued by the Special Revenue Inspector, Manjeri proposing survey of some property. I do not know how petitioner can oppose survey of property, when there is dispute on boundary. If at all, petitioner can have grievance, and the same arises only if land held by it is tried to be taken over. Since I find no justification to entertain the challenge against the proceedings for survey, I dismiss the WPC leaving open to the petitioner to raise objections and grievance if the land held by it is proposed to be taken over. (C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR) Judge kk 2