@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR LE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI J. PETITIONER Present: WRIT PETITION {ma 4003 ofgwg Kn'pashankar Mighra Assistant Teacher Nagar Palika Primary School No, 3 Dhamtari Districi Dhamtan' (CG) VERSUS : 1, State of Chhattisgarh through — Secretary, School ‘Education Department, Mannalayag Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) . Distn‘ct Education Officer Dhamtari District Dhamtari (CG) w RESPONDENTS Principal, Nagar Palika. Primary Schoo1 No. 3 Dhamtarir District Dhammri (CG) . None appeam for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER (Pegsed on i9a‘ March 2007) The petitioner, white working as Assistant Teacher at Palika Primary School No, 3 Dhamtari District Dhamtaii,' was transferred to Government Middle School, Limtara. on the name terms and conditions vide impugned order dared 2109,2001 (Annexure A/l), S : H ' B Te adhya Pradgs Administrativa Trina at Raipur vide intcrim ordw' dated 201 1 .2001 directed to maintain status quo in mgard to the position of the petitioner as was’ prevailing on iLlOZOOl. By virtue of the interim order the petitioner is continuiog at the originai place of poeting, Be that as it may, with the passage of time “this petition has become in§uetuous ate period of transfer is not aoplicable - forever. At this point of time, there is no question to examine the validity of the transfer order, However, the respendents are at liberty to pass appropriate order keeping in view the public interest and administrative exigencyi without insisting on eomptiance of the impugned transfer order. It is well settied principle of law that transfer is an incident of service and it is for the employer toV-deeide as to Where a particular tinker/employee be posted, keeping in View public interest as well as administrative exigeney. This Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interfere only in the case of proved malafide, non— competence of authority passing the transfer order and transfe order not being in conformity with therules and regulations. In view ofthe above, this petition stands disposed of'No order as t0 GOStS. Sd/- Judge Ii V i Satish K. Agnihmri ii i h M h bul r