G IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIC&TUBE OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JAB.ALPUR. Writ Petition No^[^ of 97. PETITIONER Bastar jute Udyog. through Pi-oprietor Kamal Chand Jain, son of Shri Keshrimal •^ Jain, aged 31 years, Plot No. 10, Industrial Area, Goodam Road, Jagdalpur (M.P.) versus RESPONDEICTS - I. General Mansger, District Inc:.ustries Cenfcre, Jagdalpur. (M.P.) 2. ftssistant Se Sales Tax Officer (now desiqnated as Assistant CorfuTiercial Tax Officer), Bastar Circle, Jagdalpur. (M.P.) 3. The State of Madhya Pradesh, Through the Secretary, Department of Cornmercial Taxes. Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal* 1^^^^-Si^i'^-e?^^ WRIT PETITION UI'iDER ARTICLSS 226 & 227- OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDTA. 1 .; . ..iiii.', 'r,"»!)np -i-niK'-"'9'^' ^^y-i' :f . /':° XI-HC-78 ^ESf '«i«it^i.>fchfl'C|<|<i,, riWiy<! ..\u,8.tSQ>. TFTciTapm^ •^y-^>- t»^..^.<....^200 ••& :• .;. < WtSI TOP (*tclfj<sl<Ei) sn^CTwrR'fi* ?ia!T3II^?T**li* B" iN!NSW liBKfiSiBSi^8S& Ban/e 11^-2006 ;ls' When the matter re' cailed out, none present ori behaff of the patitioner. No representation is made. Shri R. R. Sinha, Panel Lawyer for the State/responclents.' The instant pBtttibn Ivas filed against the various demarid notices issued on 15-12-92, 30-.7-93.5-12- 94, 23-12-96 and 27-12-96 under the M. P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958. „ ' i The petitionercanfilereplyof the aforesaid demand notices and if he is not satisfied with-the fmal order, then he can approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law. . In view of the ab6ve,;the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution, -—— <npifn<ili *ii*fnl"*t'(e'^l ilui'«;i'( ^•3<R|»13!I^?T !/