HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO C.M.A.No.896 of 2010 Date: 21-7-2011 Between Avuluri Ramesh Babu and another … Appellants/Respondents/ Defendants and Sirgiri Pulla Rao … Respondent/Petitioner/ Plaintiff HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO C.M.A.No.896 of 2010 Judgment: (per N.V.Ramana, J.) This civil miscellaneous appeal is filed by the appellants- respondents (defendants) against the order dated 05-8-2010 in I.A.No.691 of 2010 in O.S.No.161 of 2010 passed by the IV Additional District Judge, Guntur, wherein ad interim injunction was granted restraining them from alienating the suit schedule property. 2. Perused the impugned order. The trial Court to avoid the multiplicity of the proceedings, restrained the respondents from alienating the properties till the disposal of the suit and it was also made clear that the interim injunction is valid only for one year, indicating that the main suit has to be disposed of. It is also mentioned that the order of injunction was passed without prejudice to the contention of the respondents and it was further made clear that under no circumstances, the request of the present petitioner to extend the time will be considered. 3. In view of the above, only to avoid the multiplicity of the proceedings, the trial Court has passed the injunction order. It is the contention of learned counsel for the appellants that the suit itself is not maintainable under law in view of the award passed by Lok Adalat. 4. The Court below shall examine this contention, while disposing of the suit. 5. In the circumstances, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. However, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit as per the schedule fixed by it in the injunction order. 6. Accordingly, the civil miscellaneous appeal is disposed of. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J. _______________ K.S.APPA RAO, J. 21st July, 2011. Ak HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO C.M.A.No.896 of 2010 (Judgment of the Division Bench delivered by NVR, J.) 21st July, 2011. (Ak)