IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8870 of 2010 RABINDRA PASWAN, SON OF SHIV NARAYAN PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15/03/2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in paragraph-14 of the petitioner during course of the day. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. When the Tractor and Trailer of the Informant went missing, he instituted the case against unknown. Thereafter, the same was recovered from the shop of the present petitioner and it is alleged that he was involved in getting it painted to hide its real identity. However, taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 14.1.2010 and has no criminal antecedents, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Barooh P.S. Case No. 10 of 2010, subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he - 2 - shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)