1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1731 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 1500 OF 1983 Leela Govinda Menon. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Akhtar Hasan Rizvi. ... Defendant. Mr. R.G. Singh for the Plaintiff. Mr. Rajiv Narula a/w. Deepak A. Lad for the Defendant. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 17TH AUGUST 2009. P.C. :- Perused the Chamber Summons and the affidavit in support and reply. Having perused the same, I am of the opinion that interest of justice would be sub-served if the pleadings are allowed to be amended by correcting the name of the Defendant so also permitting the Defendant to file additional written statement so as to bring the subsequent events on record. However, on perusal of the affidavits and hearing parties, I am of the opinion that there is no case made out for joining of Respondent - Bombay Municipal Corporation as party to the Suit. The relief in that behalf is, therefore, rejected. 2 2. The Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (c). Let all amendments be carried out within a period of 10 days from today. Let additional written statement be also filed within this period. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)