IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 12TH DECEMBER 2011 / 21ST AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32828 of 2011(C) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- RAMESAN, AGED 42, S/O. GOPALA PILLA, NELLUMVILAYIL, THAZHEPURAYIL, EDAKUNNAM, NOORANAD VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.SATHISH NINAN, SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SRI.ARUN THOMAS, SRI.JENNIS STEPHEN. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 003. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, SABARIMALA DEVASWOM, SABARIMALA - 687 611. 3. RAJASEKHAR, CHANDRALAYAM, MEDICAL COLLEGE. P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003. R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR.V.V. NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR, SC, TDB. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 32828 of 2011(C) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT-P1- TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE TENDER DETAILS DATED 22/08/2011 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DEVASWOM BOARD. EXHIBIT-P2- TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCE ISSUED BY THE RANNI PERUNAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH FOR THE CONDUCT OF BUSINESS IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P3- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 25/11/2011 IN W.P(C). 31472 OF 2011 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.32828 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. This writ petition is filed by one of the licencees in terms of Ext.P1 seeking a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to take effective measures to prohibit the sale of food articles, including Pori, in the premises indicated as Sl.No.130 in Ext.P1. We dispense notice to the 3rd respondent having regard to the submission on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 that the activities by the licencees in terms of Ext.P1 would be ensured to be strictly in terms of the grant. We record the submission of the learned standing counsel for TDB that instructions have been issued to the concerned officers to ensure that there is no violation of kuthaka norms. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN Judge Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS/12.12