IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.895 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.10.2011 Col. Sudhandshu Kumar Randev ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Capt. Arun Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jaswinder Singh, DAG, Punjab. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that during the pendency of the present revision, trial stood concluded in acquittal of the accused; further contends that appeal against the acquittal filed by the complainant/petitioner herein is pending before the Division Bench of this Court. Therefore, present revision petition be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the complainant/revisionist to raise same points before the Division Bench hearing the appeal. Dismissed as withdraw with the aforesaid liberty. (Alok Singh) Judge October 04, 2011 R.S.