IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 26TH JUNE 2007 / 5TH ASHADHA 1929 RP.No. 488 of 2007(A) ( in W.P.(C)No.30879/07) --------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER ------------------------------------------------------- SISTER PRASANNA THATTIL, CORPORATE MANAGER, MARIAN EDUCATIONAL AGENCY, MARYLAND, MUTTIKULANGARA P.O., PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------ 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF KERALA, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.K.RAVIKRISHNAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No.488 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 26th day of June, 2007 ORDER This court had pronounced judgment in W.P.(C)No.30879/06 taking note of the submission of the learned Advocate General that Committee has already submitted its report and fresh guidelines will be framed within one month from 27/03/2007. Thereafter the court disposed of the matter taking note of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner will file application upon the framing of guidelines and directed a decision to be taken within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Complaint in the review petition is that, contrary to the undertaking given before this court, guidelines were not framed as undertaken before this court. Learned Government Pleader also submits that guidelines were framed only on 13/06/2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that writ petition itself may be restored back to file so that petitioner can pursue the RP No.488/07 2 contentions taken in the writ petition. In such circumstances, Review Petition is allowed and W.P.(C)No.30879/06 is restored back to file for consideration of the matter. (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) sv. RP No.488/07 3