IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37030 of 2009 1. RAM JI SINGH S/O LATE BADRI SINGH R/OMOH RAIPATTI, P.S. DIGHWARA, DISTT-SARAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Considering the nature of the allegations against him under Sections 406, 420, 364 and 341 of the Penal Code, as a member of the uniformed police force, this Court is not persuaded to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. The defence that both sides were in agreement to commit an offence under the Penal code, as employment in Government is available not on payment, but by selection, is more appropriately to be considered in a regular bail application, without being prejudiced by the present order. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)