D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6075/2007 Date of order : 24.09.2007 HON'BLE MR. RAJESH BALIA, J. HON'BLE MR. SANGEET LODHA, J. Mr. R.S. Saluja, for the petitioner. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, we do not find any merit in this petition. The petitioner was given memorandum of charges alleging that the certificate of registration from Pharmaceutical Society, Bhopal in his service record was forged one. Allegedly on inquiry from the society of Bhopal it was informed that such certificate was not issued by it. When called upon to explain the petitioner had denied to have submitted that certificate at all. But instead gave a different number of certificate of registration issued by the same institution. The Inquiry Officer found that on securing information from the institution at Bhopal, revealed that the second certificate was also not issued to the petitioner but was issued in the name of one Yusuf Khan. He therefore, returned his report with finding of charged proved. Affirming that the Disciplinary Authority imposed punishment of dismissal on the petitioner from service. On appeal the Appellate Authority found number of lacunae in the investigation and pointed out the few areas to which detailed inquiry ought to have been conducted including about the issue of issuing two certificates by the institution for the same numbers at successive entries in the Register which has not been investigated. It was also found by it that statement of witnesses have also not been recorded in this respect. He therefore, set aside the order of punishment. But finding the inquiry to be inadequate directed to conduct the inquiry afresh. Aggrieved with the aforesaid order of Appellate Authority petitioner has preferred an Original Application before the Tribunal. The Tribunal has not interfered with the directions of the Appellate Authority. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, we find no reason to interfere with the order of Central Administrative Tribunal as no case of certiorari is made out. The Appellate Authority has not reached any definite conclusion about deficiency in inquiry. Accordingly, petition is dismissed. (SANGEET LODHA)J. (RAJESH BALIA)J. Makwana/-