IN THE HIGH eOORT OF CHH&TTISGAI^H AT BILASPUR w..P.NO. g67 /2002 PETI'EIONER .('.': ->t- ^•'yy'. ^^'s^^'.'.-^ ^^y' ^yy <x^".&-"' "<>&" RESPONDENTS V E R S V S 1. 2. 3. Kr4pa Shankar Siagh, S/o. Late Shri Matur Stngh, aged atoeut 30 years, resident of Village - Raiapur, P«S. and Tabsil - AmbiK^iar, Sistriet - Surguja ( e.G. ) State ef ehha-ttisgarh, Throygh Tbe Seeretary, Revenae, D.K. S.Bhavan,RASIUR (C.@.) Coiimilssl.eaer, Bilaspur District - BIIiASPCTR (C.G.) Colleetor, SurgujaC&nbikepiir) (C.G.) WEIT PETITIOH tJHBER AICTICLES 226/227 ©FSHE ceNSTITU'PIOKi Off I13DIA FOR ISSfffiHCE OF WRI'F IH THE Na'rBBB ©FDIREOTIQHi ,ETe. XI-HC-22 3I|$?I^ 'R;ff=Bsn^i 'Hf^I ^5t'.:iffqRP?, 'STftWTS, ^WI'yy Uo.f. >-'>&. S6-^ 'f^^EI' 311^1'F.EaiW TO5?I 10.12.3003 - - tliat no useful purpose would be^ +.i<iici<<1-< w"?if Ti 'fet^t tf3T?;rc ^? eqRR •CT^T Petitioner by Shri V. K. Pa^idey, Advocate. .Respondents/State by $hri Saajay K. Agarwal, Deputy Advocate General. Heard. In vicw of fhe liinited na^ure ofprayer tuade at the tune of b.earulg that tbe dep&rtraeiital ^ppeal which. is pendiiig before fhe RespondentNo.l inay be ordei^d to be disposed of, the Court feels served in keepuig fhis writ petition pending as fhe sanie caii be dis^osed of at the adniission stage by a suitalile direction to the Respondent No.l. Agaiast fhe .order of tfcrmination dated 24.5.2000 the petitioner had preferred aa app^al before the Commissioner, which was rejected on 15.12.2000. Beifig aggrieved therewifh fhe petitioner filed' an appeal before ^he Respondent No. 1 on 20.3.2001, which is pending. The chaUeuge| to the order of removal is fhat the petitioner was not accorded opjaorfunity of hearing, as such fhe order is liable to be set-aside Sm.ee adinittedly, ttte appeal is pendiag, fhis Court is not incUn^d to go tato the mierits offhecase. Aceorduigly, this writ pctitioiij is disposcd of by du-ecting the Respondcnt No. 1 - the AppeUatej Authority to dispose offhc appcal X ^Scn a. z & (S' > ~"