1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.684 OF 2004 M/s.Siporex India Ltd. .. Petitioner Versus Pune Cantonment Board & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.V.B.Naik for petitioner Mr.A.B.Tajane for respondent No.2. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 20th January 2006. P.C. . Mr.Naik, learned Counsel for petitioner places on record a photocopy of the resolution passed by the Cantonment Board pertaining to the 2 dispute in this petition. Dispute with the petitioner about rateable value for the purpose of assessment of property tax is resolved amicably between petitioner and the Board and in terms of the agreement, this petition is allowed to be withdrawn. Ad-interim orders, if any, to stand vacated. There will be no orders as to costs. Learned Advocate for respondent No.2 undertakes to file vakalatnama for second respondent within a period of two weeks from today. Photocopy of this resolution is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)