-:1:- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 207 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 207 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 207 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 871 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 871 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 871 OF 2007 Rajendra Narsayya Dandropalli. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Mr. Zia-ul-Mustafa for the Applicant. Mrs.V.R. Bhosale, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & K.U. K.U. K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. CHANDIWAL,JJ. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 22ND APRIL, 2008. : 22ND APRIL, 2008. : 22ND APRIL, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . The case of the Applicant is that at the time of incident he was juvenile in conflict with law. The certificate produced by Community, Nativity and Date of Birth Certificate issued by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Sarangapur shows the date of birth as 6.5.1985. Similarly, in the Board of Secondary Education, Andhra Pradesh, the date of birth is shown as 6.5.1985. The incident took place on 20.5.2003. In other words, on the date of the incident the Applicant was aged over 18 years. In the light of that, it cannot be said that he was juvenile in conflict with law on the date of the incident. Hence, application is rejected. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (K.U. (K.U. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.)