1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10489 OF 2009 Shri Vasudeo Balkrishna Bhoir since deceased, through his heirs and legal representatives: 1. Smt. Manjulabai Vasudeo Bhoir & Anr. ..Petitioners Vs. The Estate Officer (Mumbai Region) & Deputy Salt Commissioner,Mumbai & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. R.S.Apte, Senior Advocate i/b. M/s. Parulekar & Associates, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr. S.R.Rajguru with Mr. S.R.Ganbavle, Advocates, for the respondents. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 15th December, 2009. P.C. 1. It is the case of the petitioner that similar writ petitions were disposed of by this Court by the order dated 16.4.2009. Those writ petitions were disposed of in terms of the order passed in W.P. No.1683 of 2007 and the statement of the respondents was also recorded that they were initiating action 2 under the provisions of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthoised Occupants) Act, 1971. 2. According to the petitioner, there are sufficient material on record to indicate that respondents cannot take steps. It is also pointed out that notice is issued against a dead person. 3. Considering the fact that in similar matters this Court has refused to exercise its Extraordinary Jurisdiction, it will not be possible for us to entertain the present petition. The respondents have already issued notices to the petitioners under the provisions of the Public Premises Eviction Act. 4. In our opinion, it will be open to the legal representative to point out to the authorities that notice is issued to a dead person and the respondents are entitled to the benefit of fresh notice. It will be open to the petitioners to raise all contentions available to them before the authorities. 5. In the event the order passed is adverse, the same be not given effect for a period of four weeks from the date of communication. 3 With the above observations, the petition is disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)