m ‘mg x ‘ x ‘ t I a Q" P Naoutu N THE HIGH C HATTRH AT BILA P R RT OF CHISGA [CHHATTIsGARH i RIT PETITION s No.: - 3125 201 § i’F: I d ! i I Ku; sunita Tiwari Ae; 45 :y‘ear- - Late _ Sr ..wari, By P LDiii Thr, ost;-ower>vson eace ted at ata 'ukhman .c. c al astanar, Basta t present worng as Shiksa arm rade—II a Pratlll‘mik Shala Bastar, (‘ rimér Scool Basta z—ear oen arour rataan a aaur, Disricit astarasgar Jgdlp BjChhttih] i , -:VERSUS:- I i é /1. tate atisgar hrough The Secretar chedule Caste- Scheue ue an S dl Tb d ackward Class{Welfare Deartmen K S Mantralaya Bhavan, S‘ 0f Chhth T y, B pt D RAIPUR Dlstt Ralur p (C G ) Th C {Ayk} e ommlssmner aut, rla eveomen aIur C G Th Sy , e ecretar E226‘QF TH § 2F JNDIA FOR THE ISSANCE O DIRECTION (S) OR ORDER (S). m a 1 51 ] Vb(WP l l {AGE %g W {1 7 0 { v ‘ ‘ \ - / , g sp D/O hi SNTi Pos M Ri HS Shool Bak Ashram B x a ki h Ki G, t Py h ) r R/ON Gld Pl, Ppgjpra, ' ! " PEITIONER - NDENTS' 8:3. :Tbl Dlpt IRp ( ) ata Rukhmam ew ansa amlttee, Ashram Dlmrapa ahs1 istrcit Jadalur C.G. M Sa Sthn S l T1 & D gp () WRJT‘PETITIQN UNDER A‘RTIQL E QONSTITUTION Q F )W ‘ nmwanisu $" WNW (W) WWW}?! r mmm§wm Qwfiwm Tumane SE ': Hon’ble $hri Manindra Mahan $5hr£vastava J, 01 -07—201G Shri J. A. Lohani, counsel f0rth1E petitiong‘r. i Shri Satish Gupta, Government Advocate Sfor the State. x/ With the consent of learned cognsei appearing for the partiee, the petition is heard finally. Learned counee! appearing fc‘r te-petitioner submits that the 'inst'ant petttion is squareiy covered by ‘the decision of this Court rendered in Smt, A. LaH v. State of Chhattisga 'h & Others, 20H? (1) ELJ 265, thus the petitioner may be permitted to mtake a representation to decide nis case in the light of afore-stated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No.3 institute is a Government aided schooi and the‘petitionar is a teacher Within the sa Learned counsei appearing fort e State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law, with date of receipt of the representation in View of foregoing, according t the learned couneei appearing fer the petitioner, nothing survives in this p tition for adjudication. t Manindra Mchan $hrivastava 3"” » ledge We W W'a, emiatr‘ra writ—mow —1 ,oo,0oo. \ \ . Mewm m‘ . W tioned strength. l a period of four‘weeks from the : h i c