IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Rev. No. 2901 of 2010 Date of decision : 27.10.2010 Raj Kumar …. Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ….. Respondents Present : Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate for the petitioner. *** S.S. SARON, J. The revision petition has been filed against the order dated 19.8.2010 whereby the charges have been framed against the petitioner for the offence under Section 307 IPC. The order dated 19.8.2010 (Annexure P1) and the charge-sheet framed on 19.8.2010 (Annexure P2) mentions FIR No.370 of 3.8.2006 registered at Police Station Safidon for the offences under Sections 324, 307, 506 and 34 IPC. The present revision petition has been filed mentioning FIR No.71 dated 2.3.2010 for the offences under Sections 324, 307, 506 and 34 IPC. The matching of the case has been done by the office in respect of FIR No.370 dated 3.8.2006. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, FIR No.370 dated 3.8.2006 has wrongly been mentioned in the order dated 19.8.2010 (Annexure P1) and in the charge-sheet dated 19.8.2010 (Annexure P2). In any case the copy of the FIR so as to know and verify the number has not been placed on record. Even the doctor’s opinion with regard to the nature of injuries has not been placed on record. Crl. Rev. No. 2901 of 2010 [2] Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present revision petition so as to file a fresh one by giving necessary particulars. Dismissed as withdrawn. (S.S. SARON) JUDGE October 27, 2010 amit