IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5245 of 2009 Date of decision : 21.5.2010 Sadhu Singh ....Petitioner Versus Smt. Harjit Kaur alias Mukhtiar Kaur ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Arvind Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aminder Singh, Advocate for the respondents S. D. ANAND, J. The learned Trial Court in allowance of an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 C.P.C. ordered the restraint of the defendants-respondents from dispossessing the petitioner-plaintiff from the property in suit forcibly except in due of law. In appeal, the learned Ist Appellate Court reversed that order and negatived ad-interim plea by observing that a co-sharer cannot seek restraint of another co-sharer in the context. The petition is disposed of with a direction that the parties shall maintain status quo during the pendency of the suit. In the view of the fact that the relevant matter is about three years old, the learned Trial Court shall dispose it of on priority. Disposed of accordingly. May 21, 2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE