IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8102 of 2009 AKHILESH KUMAR, son of Late Ramashankar Chaudhary, resident of Village Karsar, P.S. Raghunath Pur, District Siwan. ---Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director (Primary Education), Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Director, Provident Fund, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. The District Magistrate, Siwan. 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Siwan. 7. The District Provident Fund Officer, Siwan. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 16.7.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to non- payment of the general provident fund amount as also the amount standing in the suspense account. Mr Nirmal Kumar, learned Government Pleader no.4 submits that in case the petitioner files representations before the authorities concerned, the same shall be considered without delay. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner proposes to file a representation before the District Superintendent of Education, Siwan (respondent no.6) for redressal of his grievance with regard to the payment of the amount kept in the suspense account and separate representation before the District Provident Fund Officer, Siwan (respondent no.7) 2 for payment of the provident fund dues. In case such representations are filed enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of his claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the above respondents shall consider the respective grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representations and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner could be redressed without further delay and necessary payments could be made with statutory interest. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of the grievance for grant of time bound promotion, the petitioner may ventilate the same in a separate forum in accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)