IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRDESH:: HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.Nos.4388 & 4401 OF 2010 Between: Bilquees Jahana …Petitioner A n d Asia Sultana ..Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.Nos.4388 & 4401 OF 2010 COMMON ORDER: These civil revision petitions are directed against the order dated 24-08-2010 in I.A.Nos.445 and 446 of 2008 in R.C.No.103 of 2009, on the file of the IV-Additional Rent Controller, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, wherein the said application I.A.No.445 of 2008 filed by the petitioner under Rule 7(5) of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Rules and Order VIII Rule 1A(3) of C.P.C read with Section 151 CPC for filing the certified copy of the sale deed and I.A.No.446 of 2010 filed by the petitioner under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC read with Section 151 CPC to recall R.W.1 for marking the certified copy of the sale deed, were dismissed. 2. With the consent of both parties, the main CRPs are taken up for disposal. 3. Heard both sides. Perused the record. 4. The respondent herein filed R.C.No.103 of 2009 for eviction of the petitioner from the petition schedule premises on the ground of bona fide requirement for personal occupation and also on the ground that the petitioner herein has secured alternative accommodation. According to the petitioner, she has sold away her properties for the purpose of meeting the expenses while sending her son abroad. In support of the said plea, the petitioner sought leave of the Court to file certified copy of the sale deed executed by her in respect of the other property. As observed by the trial Court, burden lies on the petitioner to prove her contention. For the purpose of discharging the said burden only, the petitioner seeks to place on record certified copy of the sale deed executed by her in respect of the other property, which is claimed to be alternative accommodation by the respondent. However, the trial Court dismissed the said application on the ground that the petitioner has not chosen to file the sale deed all these days in spite of taking the said plea in the counter. 5. In the circumstances, it is considered just and fair to afford an opportunity to the petitioner to place on record a certified copy of the sale deed executed by her in her bid to discharge the burden cast on her to show that the alternative accommodation alleged by the respondent is not available to her in view of the sale. 6. In the circumstances, the impugned orders are set aside and consequently I.A.Nos.445 and 446 of 2008 in R.C.No.103 of 2009 stand allowed. It is stated that the matter has reached the stage of arguments. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the matter within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner-tenant shall produce the sale deed and further examine R.W.1 for the purpose of marking the said document on the date to be fixed by the trial Court and shall not in any way try to protract the proceedings. 7. In the result, the civil revision petitions are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 29th December, 2010 Lrkm.