1 32cra948-10 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 948 OF 2010 Amravatidevi Wd/o. Mithailal Tiwari .. Applicant V/s. Ramcharitra Indrajit Yadav .. Respondent ..... Mr. A. R. Patil i/b. Mr. D. S. Pandey for the applicant. Mr. A. R. Singh a/w. Mr. G. C. Singh for the respondent. ..... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 22, 2011. P.C.: The learned counsel appearing for the applicant on instruction of the applicant states that the applicant is not pressing the Revision Application on merits. He submits that the applicant is residing in the suit premises which is a small room for a considerably long time. He states that applicant is a widow who is residing alone in the suit premises. He, therefore, seeks time of three years to vacate the suit premises. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent opposes the said prayer. 2. The applicant is making a statement that she is not pressing the Revision Application on merits. Therefore, the decree for eviction will attain finality. The applicant is a widow who is residing in a small residential premises for a considerably long time. 2 32cra948-10 The applicant has shown willingness to give usual undertaking. Hence, time to vacate deserves to be granted till the end of the year 2013. 3. Hence, I pass the following order: :: O R D E R :: i. Revision Application is dismissed as not pressed. ii. Notwithstanding the dismissal of the Revision Application, the decree for possession shall not be executed till 31st December, 2013 subject to condition of the applicant filing usual undertaking in this Court within a period of four weeks from today. iii. If the undertaking is not filed within the stipulated time, the decree for possession shall forthwith become executable. (A.S.OKA, J.)