IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 882 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 882 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 882 OF 2008 New Holland Tractors (India) P.Ltd.... Applicant versus State of Maharashtra & ors....... Respondent. Mr. S.N. Bhatkal Sr.Adv. with Ms. Philip i/b. Singhania & Partners for the applicant Mrs. P.P.Shinde APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 25TH MARCH, 2008 DATED; 25TH MARCH, 2008 DATED; 25TH MARCH, 2008 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The present petitioner is an accused in a complaint filed under section 138 of N.I.Act. The trial court has issued process and aggreived thereby the present Criminal Application has been filed. The impugned order passed by the Magistrate issuing process can be challenged by filing a revision before the Sessions Judge. As there is an alternative efficacious remedy in the form of revision, I decline to entertain the criminal application by having recourse to section 482 of Cr.P.C. Leavig all questions raised in this application open for being agitated in a revision before the Sessions Judge, the present application is rejected. 2. At this stage, the learnd counsel for the applicant submits that the case has been fixed before the Magistrate today, and it would not be possible for the applicant to remain present before the trial court today, and a limited prayer is made to exempt the applicant from appearing before the Magistrate today. The request made is reasonable and hence I grant exemption to the petitioner from apearing in the trial court in the case today. .....