^ ^ a H.ti. •8 aan?l!T' t IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION N0.3 B5& OF 2004. B»';isilSlsftl!$;I PETITIONER Q^fS^ ^^^w ^"\G.:..Q^-'^ ?(es6r''i^.-»--<"Y""" VERSUS RESPONDENTS Artidas Manikpuri, S/o. S.D. Manikpuri, aged about 47 years C/o. R.A. Agarwal, Ahirwara, Berla Road, Ahirwara ( C.G. ) •-z><Sa>»», J> State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, PublicWorks Dept, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. C.G. ) -A.: '• 'o" tY^ N^'A \' w 2. The Engineer-in-Chief, State of Chhattisgarh, PublicWorks Dept., SIRPUR BHAWAN, Raipur ( C G ) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. v~~ ^•^ ^s-^^^l5!^ H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 3850 of 2004 Petitioner Artidas Maaikpuri Versiis nclen State of Chhattisgarh & aaofher i: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish H. Agiibotrl, J Shii Vinod Desluaufcli, Advocate for the petitiouer. Shri I.N. Shrivastava, Panel lawyer for flie respondents. ORAL ORDER (27t11 Juae, 2006) I. A. No.2137/2006 This is an application for direction to consider and decide the representation ofthe petitioner. The petitioner has filed tliis application diuing pendency of fhe petition confining his pirayer for repi^sen'tati.on to fhe respondents/authorities, to which learned counsel appearing for the l^spondents has no objection. Accordingly, fhis applicatioa is onlei^d as piayed for. The petitioiier has already raade flic repi^esentations on 9.1.2005 ancl .4.6.2005 to the l^spondent No. 1. The i^spondent No. 1 is accoixliagly diiccted to consider his rcpresentations withia a period of six weeks froni the date of receipt ofa copy ofthis order. For fhe reasons stated-above, fhe writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Sadsh K. Agnihotri Judge