CWP No.13890 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.13890 of 2010 Date of decision: 07.09.2011 Prabhu Dayal ....Petitioner Versus The Financial Commissioner and Secretary to Government Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.2. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the parties have fairly stated that in view of the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Amar Khan Vs. State of Punjab, 2009(1) RCR(Civil) 741, revision before the Financial Commissioner is maintainable even after issuance of the final sanad taksim, therefore, Financial Commissioner, Haryana, be directed to decide the revision afresh at its own merit in accordance with law after hearing both the parties within such time as fixed by this Court. In view of the above, present petition is allowed. Impugned order dated 7.5.2010 is set aside. Parties shall appear before the Financial Commissioner, Haryana, on 18.10.2011. Learned Financial Commissioner shall decide R.O.R. No.209 of 2009-10 titled 'Daryao Singh Vs. The Commissioner, Gurgaon Division, Gurgaon, and others' CWP No.13890 of 2010 -2- afresh by speaking order after hearing both the parties in accordance with law preferably within four months thereafter. (Alok Singh) Judge September 07, 2011 R.S.