IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 4521 of 2011. Decided on: 8.7.2011. __________________________________________________________ Padam Bahadur … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. … Respondents. __________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State. ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral). The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- “(i). That writ in the nature of mandamus may very kindly be issued by directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner w.e.f. due date, i.e. March, 2009, as per the policy of the State Government. (ii). That the respondents may further be directed to give the all consequential benefits in favour of the petitioner w.e.f. March, 2009 till the date of realization with interest @ 18% per annum.” 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in CWP No. 1594 of 2008, titled as Man Singh versus State of H.P. and others. 3. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioner submits that he would file an appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. 4. Therefore, in the event of the petitioner approaching the 1st respondent within a period of one month, the matter will be duly 2 considered by the 1st respondent in the light of the judgment referred to above and appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken within another four months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a copy of this judgment and the copy of the judgment referred to above. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. (Justice V.K. Sharma) July 8, 2011. Judge. (cr/virender)