IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45165 of 2010 PHOOL KUMARI DEVI @ RAJMATI DEVI, WIFE OF SRI BIRENDRA THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is the mother-in-law of the deceased and there is no specific overt act alleged against her, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. 5, Muzaffarpur, in Sessions Trial No. 672 of 2010 arising out of Paroo P.S. Case No. 104 of 2009 (G.R. No. 904 of 2009) subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after her release in the present 2 case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)