IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16295 of 2009 RAGHWENDRA MOHAN MISHRA @ BABBAN MISHRA Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 14.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is husband alleged for demand of dowry and causing of cruelty due to its non-fulfillment followed by brandishing person including private part of the wife. In which case, submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is ready to keep his wife with all dignity. For the same offence, two cases have been filed. One by the complainant herself and another by her father but that complaint case is stayed as conceded by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In the case, injury of burning is found by the Doctor also may be simple or grievous in nature. There may be difference of opinion regarding the substance which was used but burning, demand and allegation of cruelty are there. Petitioner is husband solely responsible for the affair of the wife. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)