1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.112/2010 IN WRIT PETITION No.2120/2003 Suresh Shankarrao Waghmar -vs- S.M. Haste Joint Director and another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri Kshirsagar, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : JUNE 25, 2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. He feels that the order dated 21/07/2003 which reads as under - “Rule expedited. The concerned incumbents who were temporarily promoted as Instructors shall be allowed to work as Instructors until new appointments made from the open market pursuant to the Advertisement dt. 19.7.2003. However, it will be open to there candidates to apply for the said post without prejudice to their rights and contentions in this W.P. The respondents shall receive their applications and consider their cases in accordance with law and appoint them if they are found suitable and otherwise qualified.” is disobeyed by the respondent. The learned counsel submits the cause for initiating action in terms of Section 12 of the Contempt of Court Act had accrued by virtue of communication dated 10th March, 2010 and consequently it is in limitation. 2 The action complained of dated 10th March, 2010 and the order referred above have plainly no nexus to each other. They could not have been clubbed as sought to be pointed by the learned counsel. The rigor of Section 20 of Contempt of Court Act will have prevalence and consequently the contempt petition lacks even on limitation. The order dated 21/07/2003, does not provide a right in the petitioners or the organization to seek the employment or to challenge the change of status, which is pointed by virtue of communication dated 10/03/2010. Petition dismissed. JUDGE Khunte .