IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9937 of 2011 SHEO NATH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is languishing in custody since 30.09.2010 in a case registered under Sections 304(B) and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of demand of dowry and torture. The marriage was performed six years prior to occurrence. It is submitted by the senior counsel for the petitioner that the victim died due to ailment and she was being taken to Danapur Sub Divisional Hospital from where the victim was referred to P.M.C.H., Patna, but she died on way. It is further submitted that after death of the victim information was given to the informant’s side and her dead body was cremated in which informant and other family members participated. The victim died on 08.06.2010 when the F.I.R. was registered on 09.06.2010. It appears that the informant has retracted 2 from his initial version and filed a petition to that effect before the learned court below on 23.09.2010. Considering the fact that victim died after six years of the marriage which is admitted by the informant in the F.I.R. and the informant has retracted from his initial version, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Danapur, Patna, in connection with Sahpur P.S. Case No. 62 of 2010. Learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner defaults for three consecutive dates during trial. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)