'c3 ^- ^•zo. IN THEHIGH CQURTQFCHHATnSGARHATBILASPUR A^ WRIT PETmQN No ^^ ^2005 SINGLEBENCH PETITIONER Mohd. Saoiiur Rahman, S/o, Late Abdul Rashid, Aged about 25 years, R/o. Kharsiya Naka, Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. / ^A <T'.X'^ f^ ^ '^ ^ oW' ^^^L 4. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department ofTransport, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. Regional Traasport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) Secretary, Regional Transport Authority Bilaspur. Deepak Sharma, Resident of Patthalgaon, District Jashpur. ^,^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ XI-HC-22 3Ti^T^)T f^TWW^T $h^ich^rf^T -K ) Bai-ve ^ Hl^^ll Sb^icb TS[ ^i<qi<n^, ^^^(o, f^cni^y ^..^:^D:.AP^ ^ 200 3TT^T ?^<TTW ^f^T cla 17-8-2005 Shri B. K. Rawat, counsel fc Shri Yashwant Singh Th{ No.l to3, Heard both the counsel. By the instant petition th^ teniporaiy permit in favour of r^ the route under Section 68 (3) (cJ£ route Supkalo to Kapu via of temporary permit granted in been expired, Learned counsel 'for the| Govei-nment has not formulatedl temporary peiTiiit has been grant^ petitioner's route is affected by g\ No.4, In the Writ Petition No.1 Regional Transport. Authority^ I dated 5th August 2005 this cannot be granted \vithout respondent No.2 is directed to Court in the matter of Mohd. Authority, Chhattisgarh & anothe^- With the direction aiid stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.| br the petitioner. ikur, Govt, Advocate for respondents petitioner has challenged the grant of ^spondent No.4 without formulation of (c|a) of the M.V. Act by the R.T.A. on the Pattht|lialgaon and Dharanijaigarh. The term favour. of respondent No.4 has already <=hl^Ic-l41r1 ^l<4^lt ^te^iRl^K ^3Tf^T3TI^T petitioner submitted that the State any route from Supkalo to Kapu and ^cl in favour of respondent No.4. Part of t-arit of temporary permit to respondent ^532/2005 (Mohd. Kayum Khan V. Chhatttegarh & aaother) vide order held that even temporar^r permit fo.biiulation of the route. Therefore, |ollow the above order passed by this jKayLim Kliiaii. Vs. Regional Transport he^ while granting temporaiy permit. o^sei-vation aforesaid, the writ petition 11651/2005 also stands disposed of. Cobrt Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge