IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5466 of 2010 Veena Rai Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 02. 15.07.2011 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. Ritesh Kumar, assisting counsel to A.A.G. 3 for the State is present. The writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 22.12.2009 passed by the Sub-Judge IV, Gopalganj in Election Petition No. 6 of 2006 / 603 of 2009. The writ petitioner contends that respondent no. 5 was declared as a winning candidate. The election was challenged by him by filing an election petition before the Election Tribunal-cum-Sub Judge, IV, Gopalganj who vide order dated 22.12.2009 directed for fresh election. The respondent no. 5 came before this Court by filing C.W.J.C. No. 304 of 2010 and the order of the Tribunal was set aside. It is contended that since the petitioner who was a respondent was not able to challenge the issue no. 3 framed by the Election Tribunal, hence he is filing the present writ petition. It is admitted that the term of the previous Panchayat in question stood completed in March/April, 2011 and fresh elections have also taken place. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.) 2