1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICTURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. O R D E R Mani Shanker. Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 968/2007 ... Date of Order: 26th February 2007 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. Rajesh Joshi, for the petitioner. BY THE COURT: The only grievance raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the case of the petitioner has not been recommended by the Authority concerned and the petitioner was permitted to make a detailed representation, which the petitioner made vide Annx.9 dated 15-3-2005, but the respondents have not decided the said representation and, therefore, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to decide the said representation Annx.9 dated 15-3-2005. The writ petition can be disposed of by giving a direction to the respondents to decide representation Annx.9 dated 15-3-2005 filed by the petitioner ventilating his grievances utmost expeditiously, latest by the end of 30-4-2007 by a speaking and reasoned order, may be in brief, keeping in view 2 the fact that the earlier writ petition being SBCWP No. 667/1997 filed by the petitioner came to be disposed of by this Court on 26-5-2000 and thereafter, before the case of the petitioner could be considered, the provisions of Section 11 of the Rajasthan (Regulation of Appointment to Public Services and Rationalization of Staff) Act, 1999 came into force, which, on being challenged before a Division Bench of this Court, was quashed and held to be unconstitutional in Bhawani Singh etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan & ors., RLR 2003 (1) Raj. 64. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (H.R. PANWAR), J. mcs