IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Revision No. 16 of 2010 Raghubir Singh S/o Gurwant Singh and others - Revisionists. Vs Deepak Kumar S/o Nathi Ram - Opposite Party. Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, Advocate for revisionists. Ms. Anjali Noliyal, Advocate for opposite party. [Hon’ble B.S. Verma, (Oral)] Heard Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, Advocate for the revisionists and Ms. Anjali Noliyal, Advocate for opposite party. This revision has been preferred for setting aside the order dated 26-4-2010, passed by J.S.C.C./FTC IVth Dehradun in SCC Suit No. 4 of 1999, Raghubir Singh Vs. Deepak Kumar, whereby the application 99-C moved by the petitioner seeking permission to file documents on record, was rejected. I have perused the impugned order. The petitioner has filed SCC Suit No. 4/1999 before the JSCC/FTC IVth Dehradun and by way of application 99-C he sought permission to file certified copy of first assessment and original first tax payment receipt for the period 1988-89. The objection of defendant was that the plaintiff had knowledge of these documents and he could file the same either at the time of filing the suit or at the time when he filed his evidence. The allegation of petitioner was that the defendant has stated new facts in his statement and for just decision of case the papers, which he wanted to bring on record, are necessary. I find that for just decision of the case and in the interest of justice, the application 99-C should be allowed subject to cost. The revision is allowed. The impugned order dated 26-4-2010 is set aside and the application 99-C moved by petitioner for taking on record two documents is allowed, subject to cost of Rs. 2000/- payable to the counsel for respondent by the revisionist within a period of two weeks from today. Dated: 8-7-2011 (B.S. Verma, J.) ISB