IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 4260 of 2009. Decided on: 29th March, 2010. Diksha Jagotra. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved since she was not considered for selection to the post of TGT (Arts). It appears that the only ground was that the petitioner has not produced OBC Certificate. She has claimed that she belongs to OBC. Even assuming that she has not produced the OBC Certificate, the application could not have been rejected since in any case, the petitioner could have been considered against the general category quota. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to go into merits of the contentions, if she is directed to be considered against the general category quota. Therefore, leaving all the contentions open, it is made clear that the petitioner shall be considered against the general category quota. The needful in this regard shall be 2 done within two weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say that the logical consequences will follow. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 29, 2010. (Justice R.B. Misra), (tr) Judge.