IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34509 of 2008 PYARI DEVI & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 03.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. It is submitted that the petitioners could not avail the privilege of anticipatory bail by surrendering and executing bail bonds within the time fixed. By inadvertence it could not be pointed out that final form had been submitted, not sending them up for trial when differing with the same cognizance has been taken. This Court is not persuaded on the said grounds to reconsider the prayer for anticipatory bail. This application is disposed of with the observation that on the date when the petitioners surrender, their application for regular bail shall be considered in accordance with law keeping in mind that they had been enlarged on anticipatory bail but could not surrender in time, they are ladies, and final form had also been submitted, without being prejudiced by the present order. Let the order be communicated by FAX at the cost of the petitioner. Sym (Navin Sinha, J.)