:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4903 OF 2004 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1348 OF 2004 Hanmant Trimbak Nagargoje. ....Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ....Respondent. Mr. Shekhar Ingawale, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal, APP for the Respondent. CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED : 12TH JANUARY, 2005 P.C.: . Heard Mr. Shekhar Ingawale, learned counsel for the accused-applicant. The prosecution in support of their case produced ocular evidence, circumstantial evidence, medical evidence and forensic evidence. Prima facie, it appears that the death of Sindhu occured due to throttling by the accused-applicant and thereafter her body was burnt. At this stage, it cannot be said that there is no evidence connecting the accused with the crime. No case for grant of bail is made out. Criminal application is rejected. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)