THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No :22722 of 2007 DATED:29-10-2007 BETWEEN: Uyyuru Venkat Reddy. ..... PETITIONER AND The District Collector, Guntur District & 3 others. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner; learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development appearing for the respondents 1 to 3; and the learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent. 2. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not conducting any sort of enquiry with regard to the irregularities committed by the 4th respondent, despite submitting the representations, dated 19-07-2007, 30-07- 2007, and 13-08-2007 respectively, as illegal, and arbitrary. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he is the panchayat member of 5th ward of Nidamarru Gram Panchayat, Mangalagiri mandal, Guntur District, and the 4th respondent is the Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat and with regard to the alleged misappropriation of funds by the 4th respondent, petitioner made a representation, dated 19-07-2007, before the respondents 2 and 3, and the 2nd respondent-District Panchayat Officer, Guntur vide his proceedings in Roc.No.3241/2007-G6, dated 06-08-2007, requested the 3rd respondent-Divisional Panchayat Officer, Guntur to enquire into the matter with regard to the representation of the petitioner, dated 19-07-2007, and submit a report to him. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that the 3rd respondent has not conducted any enquiry and no report has been submitted to the 2nd respondent. The only grievance of the petitioner is that when a direction has been given by the 2nd respondent there cannot be any justification on the part of the 3rd respondent in keeping over the matter pending. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, 3rd respondent is directed to implement the said orders of the 2nd respondent, dated 06-08-2007, as expeditiously as possible, by submitting a report without any unnecessary delay. 6. Accordingly, Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J 29th October, 2007. Tsy