IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4618 of 2009 RANJIT PRASAD Versus THE TILKA MANJHI UNIVERSITY & ORS. ----------- 2/ 13/04/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Tilka Manjhi University. The petitioner was placed under suspension which came to be quashed in C.W.J.C. No.3425/2000. The petitioner joined on 20.6.2005, but his wages have not been paid till date. The writ application has been filed thereafter on 10.4.2009. There is no specific pleading of the date on which the petitioner claims to have submitted his representation before the authorities for arrears of wages and neither is there any pleading of the mode, method and manner in which the representation has been served upon the respondents. This Court, therefore, finds it difficult at this stage to pass any positive orders on the claims of the petitioner. If the petitioner is working, quite obviously he is entitled to his wages. This is purely an administrative matter. The writ application is disposed with the direction to the respondents concerned where the petitioner be working and those who may have the supervisory powers, 2 to ensure the payment of salary, that if the petitioner has filed a representation, as claimed by him, appended at annexure-2 on 23.12.2008, let the same be disposed of by a reasoned and speaking order and the legitimate dues, if any, paid within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. KC (Navin Sinha, J.)