^'''.o ^y- ^^••- ' ^" ^....--.^ -^^- ..-.-^^^! 6>1 ?B^Sfti| SMRI I" Hi"N ^8»S . ^^(^, IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR PETITIONER -feT W.P:NOf? ^ ^ 7 OF. 2006 JWs Radhe Shyam Udyog, through its Proprietor Shri Sanjay Bandiya, son of Late Radhe Shyam Bandiya, aged about 30 years, resident of Gandhi Ganj, Raigarh (C.G.) vs RESPONDENT /'Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, through its Chairman, Raigarh (C.G.) PETITION UNDERARTICLES 2261^ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA "y XI-HC-78 3^ •^irara'iT, ®Tn«'is,f5icfiy^<. . ^.P. KO&^M %')/A006 *n*i<<<i sh+iitti Wj; 200 3ii^?r <raq? ('^gq^c) sn^r^rf^iN) craTSD^TshHro s^iTWdferan^T <<ii<iT<i<f)-i iiiciT^"tec3'<Rf.Ki<; ^gri^irsn^r 24.1.2007 Sushri Sharmila Singhai, Shri A.S. (Saharwar, Advoa| Heard. This petition is directed 2006 of Annexure P-3. Learned counsel for the ^ bill has been issued to the p| inspection conducted in the before issuing the said bi[t, no Section 126 of the EIectricit/ A\ issuance of such bill is per-se because of non-payment of thi connection of, the p.etitioner's On the other hand! respondent/Chho.ttisgar'h State Chhattisgarh State Electr'icity l^ \ Chhattisgarh State Electricity ^ of (Srievances of Consumers Electricit/ Ombudsman) Regula-t^i A<pvocate, for the petitioner. ^te for the respondent. lagainst Biil dated 30th October, ietitioner submits that the above )|etitioner on the basis of some pre^nises of the petitioner, however mtmdatory notice as rsquired under ;t was given to the petitioner ond iltegal. She further submits that i^ amount of the bill, electricit/ pre^mises has been disconnected. learned counsel for the Electricity Board submits that ^egulatory Commission has framed tegutatory Commission (ftedressat ohd Establishment of Forum and ons, 2004 and as per Regulation / XI-HC-78 3^'Fiirowr, ®ifl<i'iis,Riciwy,< HTHCtiaiW^ \>3- Wi^ta...7Ll8^^6&6 200 Sll^ltRW (l^cli^cf^HT) 3TI^TWR-fi+ trarsn^raiTiRi p ?;R?fwaferaTT^r -2 22, complaint mechanism has dispute of the consumers recfardi I have heard learned coun; This petition connot be that alternative remedy under th^ Electricit/ Regulatory Gommiss Consumers ond Establishment of Regulations, 2004 is available. In view of the above Consequently, M.W.P. No. ^ belen provided for redressal of any i^ig their electricity bills. jel for the petitioner. erjtertained in the light of the fact i^e provisions of Chhattisgarh State fon (Redressal of Srievances of porum and Electricity Ombudsman) obserjvat wifepfrr wfcff¥teid'tfSRCTt ^Slf^TSn^T ion, the petition is disposed of. ^128/2006 also stands disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge '^ P.T.O.