PETITIONER Snail Kumar Dawangan S/o Shri Satya Narayan Dewangau, aged about 40 years, Village Agricultura Extriilsiuon Of‘uzccr, O$ccr 0f Deputy Director Agriculture. Dhamatari Residant of Maitri Vihar Colony Dhamatari, Dist. Dhamatan‘ (G.G.) Versus State of Chhaftisgarh Through Secretaiy/ Ac‘tditional Secretary Department of Agriculture D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C. G.) The Direrztm", Directomte of Agriculture Department, D.K. S. Bhawan, Raipur {C.G.) The C0116ct0r, District Dhamatari (ca) Deputy Director (Agriculture) Dist. hamatari (C. G.) RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2.26 OF THE CGEJSTITHT}ON 6F INDIA Presence : Shi’i RS. Pate], counse} for me petitianer. Shn' A.S. KachhawahagGovt. Advocate for the State on advance copy. SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Hed on admission. The petitioner, Who is working on the post of Village Agriculture Extension Officer, has been traneferred from Dhamtari to Korba on ad miniStrative grounds. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the eon of the petitioner is studying in Class 6th in Dhalu i Public School, therefore, the transfer is causing great hard ship to him. These are not the grounds for a court of law to interfere with the fransfer of the employee. The transfer is an incidence of seivice. Noliorly working on a transferable post. can claim for his posting at a panicular . place. Who shoukl he posfed Whem is to he seen by the l l x HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.PJS\ No. 6605 of 2067 eRAL cRnER (15.11.2007; D ar @ 2 W.P.(S) No. 6605 of 20G7 employer which dapm’xds upon the administrativa exigency as also pnhiic interast. Unkgs the ordm‘ of transfer is shown f0 he Vitiatad by mabfides, extraneous: cmmidcrafions or is shown to b6: passed against any statutory rule or fhf: Act, the same cannot be. interferad with bv a Court of law, is the sattled View of the Apex Court. Learnad counsel for the psfitionev could n01: point out any such ground of malaflde or of extranoous consideration or that tho order has been passed against any statutory rule or the Act. l do not find any reason to interfere with the order of «‘7 K. transfer of the petitioner on this ground. The petition is dismissed at the motion stage itself. Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge vatti