<2) ^3iSi1Uil^C l$Klvjlj:i?;i s IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) N0. M^^"" /2010 PETITIONER ^-•^ Chandra Kumar Yadav, S/o Shri Teezram Yadav, Caste - Yadav, Occupation Patwari, presently working at P.H.No.30 Dhamni, Tah. r, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS .) ^^?^^tJ^^^' ^^^ ^^0-'^^'^^U.^""°""" Jaijaipur, District Janjgir-Champs Y;^y^t"~ (c.o.) ^^ RESPONDENTS 1. " State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. District Collector, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3. Sub-divisional Officer (Revenue) Sub-Division Sakti District- Janjgir-Champa(C.G-) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUnQN OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHA'mSG.^RH AT BILASPLTR WRFf PETITION (S) No. 4997 of2010 PETITIONER RE8PONDENTS Chandra Kumar Yadav. VERSU8 State ofChhattisgai-h & Others •^ WRTLPETmQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF THE CQNSTH'LTIQN OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble SIm Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: Shri Sunil Otwani, Advocate for the petitioner. SM Shashank Thakur, Panel Lavvyer for the State/respondents. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 15th day ofJune, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents subinits that the petitioner has already continued at Patwari Halka No. 30, Dhanmi fbr more than nine months 011 account of interim order granted by this Court 01.09.2010, The State/respondents may be gi'anted liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in view public intercst and administrative exigency. Sliri Thakur iiirther submits that the StateA'espondents shall not insist upon complianceofthe impugn$d order dated27.08.2010 (Annexure P/l) inrespect ofthe petitioner. 2. At this stage, when no efiTect could be given to the impugiied order dated 27.08.2010 (Annexure P/l) on account ofthe mterim order dated 01.09.2010, thus, it is not necessary to go mto legality and validity ofthe aforestated impugtied order. 3. In view of the above, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives m fhis petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of No order asto costs. 5. Interim relief granted on 01.09.2010 is vacated. ^' ^T^ AViotri Amit