IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21369 of 2010 1. SIYA RAM SINGH 2. Pawan Pratap Singh Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 14.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Awadhesh Kumar, learned counsel for the informant. Petitioners along with others are alleged for making demand of ransom, snatching of cash and chain as informant’s brother was a contractor. A lease was given to him for taking away stone from Pachar Pahar. Allegation is doubted on the ground that undoubtedly, lease was granted to the informant’s brother but explosion was not allowed even then violating the terms of lease explosion was being made and in that continuation one day earlier to the incident while there was explosion villagers injured. One of the accused persons namely Santosh filed an F.I.R. to the above effect. Later on petitioner no.1 received injury admitted to hospital and made a statement to the effect that due to explosion several villagers were injured and to save the skin, this false allegation is leveled and petitioners are apprehending their arrest which never can be justified at the moment. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Rafiganj P.S. Case No. 42 of 2010 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount 2 each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Aurangabad subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)