IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 639 of 1998 Between: 1 Smt. Maguluri Venkayamma, W/o. Hanumantha Rao, R/o. Hussain Nagaram, Pedakurapadu Mandal, Guntur Dist. 2 Krapa Veera Simham, S/o. Venkat Rao, Butchayapalem, Pedakurapadu Mandal, Guntur Dist. 3 Sunkara China Venkateswarlu, S/o. Koteswara Rao, Ramapuram, Pedakurapadu Mandal, Guntur Dist. 4 Y.Anuradham, W/o. Venkata Rao, Hussain Nagaram, Pedakurapadu Mandal, Guntur Dist. 5 Tumati Sarojini, W/o. Koteswara Rao, Butchayapalem, Guntur Dist. 6 Munagoti Bujjalamma, W/o. Raghavulu, R/o. Ramapuram, Guntur Dist. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 State Election Commission, Buddha Bhavan, Secunderabad, Hyderabad. 2 District Collector, Guntur. 3 District Manager, A.P.State Housing Corporation, Guntur. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Notification No.276/SEC-B 197-39 dt.1.1.1998 and the consequential Order dt.4-1- 1998 authorising the 3rd respondent to convene the meeting of the members of the Mandal Parishad Pedakurapadu, Guntur Dist and the Notice dated 4-1-1998 issued by the 3rd respondent convening the Meeting of Members of Mandal Parishad, Pedakurapadu, Guntur Dist, for purpose of electing the Election of M.P.T.C.Hussaininagaram, Pedakurapadu, Guntur District. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.MOVVA.CHANDRASHEKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following ORDER: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY Writ Petition No.639 of 1998 ORDER: (Per Sri V. Eswaraiah, J) Sri P. Chandra Sekhar, learned counsel, representing Sri Movva Chandrashkar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _________________ V. ESWARAIAH, J ______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J Dt.25.06.2009 VGB