IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3738 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision 16.02.2011 Vinod Kumar ...... Petitioner VERSUS Jai Singh and another ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.R.D.Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Kulbhushan Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J: Assailed in this petition is the order dated 04.05.2010, passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rewari, dismissing the application of the petitioner-plaintiff for leading additional evidence. The suit filed by the petitioner is for permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering into his peaceful possession.. It is not a suit for declaration where the question of title has been raised. The petitioner is required to produce the evidence, as per issues. Even otherwise, the petitioner was awarded seven effective opportunities from 26.09.2005 till 09.01.2008 in order to lead evidence and no reasonable cause has been shown for tendering the pedigree table into evidence at the earlier stage. The counsel has failed to indicate the relevancy of the pedigree table and what type of assistance it would provide if taken into evidence. The petitioner has also not stated if he was not in the knowledge of the said pedigree table earlier. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 16.02.2011 mamta-II