'3 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION N0. 2-3 2 f /2006 PETITIONER ....' ^..-•"w- \p'so..-<Yf--" ^r^y.^ y^ ^ ^::^.-^ r>'. ^••"'A.-l^ ..•••'''.CK$SC1'-" ,,5?^" '^' RESPONDENTS ^^^ 10 ^' Ramnarayan Sahu, aged about 48 years, son of Shri Goverdhan Sahu, Ex-Ad-hoc Upper Division Teacher, resident of vitlage Mareli, Post MareU, Via Bhakhara, Tah and District Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough - the Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur (C.G.) 2. 3. 4. Director, Public Education Pension Bada, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur District Education OfGcer Dist. Education Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) The Secretary, Department of School Education, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. The Petitioners, named above, respectfuUy submits as under:- HIGH COURT OF CljHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2331 of 2006 Petitioner Respondeats Versus Ram Narayan Sahu. State ofChhattisgarh and others -^. Post for order on g' May, 2006 Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge <- HIGH COURT OP JUDICATURE CHHATnSGARH: B1LASPUR Sin^e Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satlsh K. Agaihotri, J. W. P. No. 2331 of 2006 Rani Narayaa Sahu. Versus Petitioner Respondents State of Chliatdsgarh and others Shri A.N. Bhakta, counsel for the petitioner. Shri G.K. Beriwal, Deputy Advocate Gcneral with Shri Satish Gupta, Depuly Govemineut Advocate for the Stete. ORDER ( ^1iaay,2006) 1. According to the petitioncr, he was appointed as Upper Droision Teacher on Ad-hoc basis at Middk School Kundel, from 18.3.81 to 30.4.1981. He was again appointed at Goveminent Higher Secondary School Hasda for the period belween 21.7. 1982 to 30.4.1983. Thcreafter, he was appointed aad worked in Govemiaent Higher Secondaiy School Champajhar froni 5.9.1983 to 30.4.1984. 2. The petitioner filed a petition before the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Jabalpur bearing M.P. No. 1662/1984. The said writ petition was transferred to the State Administrative Tribunal and was registered as T.A. No. 2693/1988. The Tribunal by its order dated 20.8.1997 (Aanexure P-1) disposed of the petition with a direction to fhe respondents to scrutuiize cases of each petitioner and zy A tf fhey were found eUgibte, they be considered for appointment. The petitioner has filed fhis petition seeking impleinentation of the order dated 20.8.1997 passed by the State Admiaistrative Tribunal in T.A. No.2693/1988. This petition has been ffled on 30.4.2006 after a period of more thaa 8 years. The petitioner has uot inade out a case for coxidonation of unexplained, inordmate delay of niore thaa 8 years. Rights of the parties and other sniularly situated candidates raust have been crystaUized by this tiine. It is fiirther subniitted fhat the petituner has made several representations wtiich could not evoke response fiTom. the respondents. It is weU settled priaciple of lam in view of fhe decisions of fhe Supreme Court iu the cases of Jagdlsh Narafat MalUar Vs. The State of Bihar Aad Others, (1973) 1 SCC 811, P.8. Sadasivaswaml Vs. State of TamU Kadu, (1975) I SCC 152, srnd Karnataka Power Corporrtion Ltd Vs. ANR V.K. Thangsppan & AMR, 2006 AIR SCW 1828, that repeated representations caimot justify a belated approach to the Courts. Entertamiag belated approach would itasettle the setUed matters, and fhe sanie shoirid be avoided. For fhe reasons stated above, this petition is disnussed. ay*^ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge