1 20 cas.39.10 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Nilesh Wable i/b Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure for the Applicants. Mr. Jitendra Gaikwad i/b Mr. Anilkumar Patil for the Respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 21 st November, 2011. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicants. 2 The Applicants are the original Plaintiffs. The suit filed by the Applicants has been dismissed and even the appeal preferred by them has been dismissed. During the pendency of the suit and the appeal, there was no injunction granted by the Courts below for protecting possession of the Applicants. 2 20 cas.39.10 3 Hence, no case is made out for granting injunction in terms of prayer clause (a). However, a limited injunction in terms of the prayer clause (b) deserves to be granted. 4 Accordingly, the application is disposed of by directing that till the disposal of the second appeal, the Respondent shall not create any third party rights in respect of the suit property. [ A.S.OKA, J ]