EEGE EQURE‘ O}? CEEATTE§GAR§LR £2iyA$£fUx€ $5.3 €$§ E'm45é$i2lm3’1 LP, D611ja1‘e, aged about 50 years, SI’O Late Shri Ra’dram Denjare, Accouzltant, Block Education Gfiiw, Kuakuri, Distt JaShpur {cm ?E’HTE®E§ER ‘ifer$aw 1. State of Chilattisgarh Through the Sacretary, Eepa‘rtment of Triba1 Weifare, Mantraiaya, D . K. ‘3 Bhawazl, Raipur {CL G.) 2. CoEiactor, Jashpur 3 Assistant Commisgionér, T1‘iba1 A‘kwx Welfare, Jaehpur é‘r. Block; Education Officer, Kunkm‘i, Diem, Jashpur a BK. Ra§put, ASSistaat Commigeiener, Tribal» WeEare, Jasueur 6. SK. Chaudhari, B1ock Education Oificer, KLHLkuri, Distt. Jashpur RESPGEEENT$ WT PETITEGII? ‘EJEJDE& AR’l‘iiCLE 2Z6 @? ‘E‘HE $Q1¥STETE§TE§E€ ‘9? EW’L‘MA Aegearaaee: Shri Utkarsh Verma, Counsel for the Detitione}: Shri Yatshwant Singh; Govt. Adveeate, fey the State 011 advance copy. ORAL OREEI geeeeaew; ' $E3E§EL KVMA.R SEEE§$L J, Heaid . Leamled con-nee} for me petitioner arguee that even affer pasejng the ei‘cier of transfer dated 20.7.2007. L‘qe respondente are not reh’evmg the yetitioner tjl’i date. Hewever, after arguing for Some Tjiue, he. pravs for Vxdthdl‘awal 0f this peii‘don 0&1 ihe ground that most pro'babhv‘ the pefitiouer would be relieved in near fumre. He also prays that Lf ille Trausfer order is not efiected in near future, he may be grgmted Ebert‘; to renew the prayer (moe agam. The prayer apeears to be genuine. Far tim um? bang, 121s How/*évsr, i116 p6tifi021€r shall b6 causa ef ac’ii011 ,per 1‘31 futurss. This petitiou "‘w Eii’. §S§ §§a.435$i2GQ? yetitian is psimitted to be. m Ebarij; to mpeat hi3 praya 1'11 case, tedilin ' To H16 said mansfe: oxtiar aris’sss in ’ $ia11ds; fmaiéf,’ disposad of wim 1116 above Gbsgz \ vv‘iihdrawn ally his fax/am“ i L 5mm Kumar Sdl- 3mm _ , I / J ‘ J ‘r ‘ \ \ ‘ ‘ ‘/ 1 ) ) J J 1 Judge Vatiaa .