IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2009 / 7TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 21336 of 2009(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. P.T.MOHANAN, AGED 50, VALLELIKKUNNEL, AYARKKUNNAM. 2. THANKACHAN, AGED 40, METHURUTHIL, AYARKKUNNAM. 3. PREETHA THANKACHAN, AGED 36, METHURUTHIL, AYARKKUNNAM. 4. MATHEW ABRAHAM (DIED), REP.BY P.A.VARGHESE, KANDATHIL PEEDIKAYIL, AMAYANNOOR P.O. 5. M.L.BASKARAN, AGED 58, VAZHAPPARAMPIL, AMAYANNOOR P.O. 6. KURUVILA MAMAN, KURUMULLILAYA KURISINGAL, AMAYANNOOR. 7. JOMOL KURUVILA, KURUMULLILAYA KURISINGAL, AMAYANNOOR. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE AYARKUNNAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, AYARKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM. 2. GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL OFFICER, AGRICULTURAL DEBT WAIVER & DEBT RELIEF SCHEME, 2008, THE AYARKUNNAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, AYARKUNNAM. 3. THE KOTTAYAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, KOTTAYAM. /2/ 4. JOINT REGISTRAR (AUDIT) CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KOTTAYAM. 5. THE REGIONAL OFFICER, NABARD, REGIONAL OFFICE, TRIVANDRUM. 6. THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRIVANDRUM. 7. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL, NEW DELHI. ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN,SC,K.S.CO-OP BANK FOR R6 ADV. SRI. T.A.SHAJI SC. KOTTAYAM DIST. CO-OP BANK BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. --------------------- W.P.(C).No.21336 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioners submit that they are members of the first respondent Society who had availed of agricultural loans from the said respondent. It is stated that they are all eligible for the benefit of Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme, 2008, copy of which is Ext.P1. Petitioners contend that though they have filed Ext.P3 and other similar representations before respondents 1 and 2, the said representations have not been considered. Having regard to the limited nature of the relief that is sought for, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 and similar other representations if any that have been filed by the petitioner's. Orders shall be passed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of WP(c).No.21336/09 2 production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.21336/09 3