IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 28TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 5124 of 2010(M) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. NARAYANAN KUTTY AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.AYYAPPAN, KOCHERIL, THAMMANIMATTOM, ERNAKULAM. 2. BABY, AGED 61 YEARS,S/O.THOMAS, KOCHERIL, THAMMANIMATTOM, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.PAUL MATHEW (PERUMPILLIL) SRI.P.V.SREENIJIN SMT.K.B.SONY SRI.PRASUN.S SRI.SANU.S.PANICKER RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. INDUS TOWERS LTD., CIRCLE OFFICE AT VANKARATH TOWERS,8TH FLOOR, N.H.47, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI-24, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. POOTHRIKKA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, POOTHRIKKA GRAMA PANCHAYAT. MR.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL, SC FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.5124 of 2010 (M) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 17th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T The limited relief that is sought for in the writ petition is for a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1, a complaint made by the petitioners making allegations against the 1st respondent. 2. It is seen that the complaint has been received and has been acknowledged by Ext.P2. In such circumstances, there is no reason why the complaint shall not be considered. 3. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1 with notice to the 1st respondent also. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the allegations raised and it is entirely for the 2nd respondent to deal with the issue. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg