: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8192 OF 2006 Suryakant G. Suryawanshi ....Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.Amit Sale for the Petitioner. Mr.R.D. Rane, Government Pleader for the Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 6TH FEBRUARY, 2007. P.C. : 1. The Petitioner was appointed as a coolie in the Construction Department. In the year 1987, for the sake of convenience of work, the Petitioner was asked to do the work in Streetlight (Water Works) Department when the Petitioner has been working since 1989. By an order dated 1.9.2006 the Petitioner therefore has been asked to come back to Construction Department. Hence this Petition. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. We find that there is no legal right in the Petitioner as the appointment was that of a coolie and for the sake of arrangement and convenience only, the Petitioner was asked to do the work in the : 2 : Electric Department. Hence no case for interference in our extra-ordinary jurisdiction. 3. However, it will be open to the Petitioner to make a representation to Respondent No.2 considering the Petitioner’s long experience in the service in the Streetlight Department, that the Petitioner should be allowed to continue in the same terms and conditions as earlier. If such representation is made within two weeks from today, Respondent No.2 will consider and dispose off the same not later than four weeks thereafter. 4. With the above observations, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)