IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35502 of 2008 1. DEO PUJAN MAHTO 2. KANHAIYA MAHTO 3. PRATIMA KUMARI 4. JIRA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 28/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a police case under Sections- 304B and 201/34 of I.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioners or the State are unable to point out any thing from the case diary suggesting that the deceased died a natural death on account of pregnancy when the allegations are of death in other than natural circumstances in the background of demands for dowry in a marriage of 3 years. The application is rejected insofar as petitioners- 1, 2 and 4 are concerned. Considering that petitioner No.3 Pratima Kumari is stated to be the unmarried sister of the husband, let her surrender before the court below within four weeks when she shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate Saran in Rasulpur P.S. Case No.60 of 2007, subject to the - 2 - conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. It goes without saying that the considerations for regular bail are different from those for anticipatory bail and rejection of the latter cannot prejudice the former. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )