' a BEFOREJHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT 3EN€§LE WINSH A; BILASPUR j was; . ?.?53./2009§S.B) Petitioner: yLachhi Ram Uraon S/o—Late P.R.Uraon aged about 63 years, Occupation- Retired PrincipaLR/o- Viiiage- Kena paii P.O.— Dhangag Tahsii & Distt— Raigarh (CG) Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, - Through:- Secretary School Education Depanment, Mantraiaya D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 The Di§trict Education Officer, Distt. Raigar(C.G.) 3f The Joint Director, -Treasury Account & Pension Office Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. The TreasurerRaigarh Treasury Office Raigarh (C.G.) «a WRIT PETITIONU UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR QUASHING THE LETTER / ORDER DATED 8/10/2009 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 WHERE BY THE RETIRAL DUES OF THE PETITIONER HAS BEEN ILLEGALLY WITHHOLD BY THE RESPONDENTS . // “Ma—M/ xvnf/ n, .i (”r‘ CQUQT “w {EH-i ARH #T BiLhf)? R WRW PETETEON {S3 Na ?’2$‘3 G1” 263$ PETiTiGNER : Lachhi Ram Siam x RE§P \EDENTQ 1 T PE”?£T£$N UNDER ARTECLE ‘>2r‘*‘ {3F THE C;$NST;‘E‘U’¥“¥0N ”r NSLQ Sa Har me Snn $a£isb K Aman ¢. , Advoae fr the goner. SM giggi‘k Smg‘n, Pamei Lam/year f0; the State. E§Si§$ e Svate m Vnmrtlbgagh X i'hers WRIT ER ER @RAU (Passed cm 17‘ day m‘ Febmam 2m 1,} Learned cam e‘ agpeai m1: far he petiiimm sub .hs i: at tn¢ Gag bemg pavment a? retire? bemefi‘is maiten may be referreal {5 the .OEE'EIOH C0mmi¥i€€“ This Cami m ihe matier crf WP. Na. 4842i :64 (Baijrgath Maadai v. ?' e Siafe of $§§baffi3§am 2?: Gggys} am (£3113? ccxrmecied matters, directed ihe Semmi’itee t0 aansiéef the maisie? ¢§ refirai dues aa the aiispwaed questéerr of facts weye invoéved. The CommH‘iee was cwstimiad by ihe Siate Gmmmmem, pus‘suam m me arder (iated ,%§.%20’V~3 pa3$ed m WP. HQ. §961i26£§8 {Smt Kei'a 3a Chandrakar \A S§afe Gavemmem afid ofi’iers) am enier dated “i3 G 2638 passed m H C C N6 13" of 9G€E8 { “we 0e Cwf‘awgsgar & Gthers v. S§Wafh Marm'ai amg anmher) sguareiy cavereci by the 3Lndgmemi anri def Q¢aLe’i 3g f ?§msary, 2&68 §a5$ezi in WP. Mm 4642,52GG4 Sag'nafr? Manwi §saipi'&g} a5 gabmit‘zga‘ bv Eeamai counseE apaewing far fhe .margies This pe’zitim Es accordmaty diwegeti of w: the sama terms, Le. the Grfr’a cw h e Advmate {:encw is. ""rectm: to Sam be a {e {he Sammiirtee. wiihm a pErioci of 15 days fmm ‘ehe {kite of reaeigs‘t cf a ‘ os :5 9e€wimn fron‘ ??~e pét we! and h.s oa’dy T‘hereaftér, the cy ‘\ m” a 'maey at a eirii WG‘ Comm§tiee shai% iSsae miice t0 fhe peii'imner and ‘tha of?§cers cancemed, wimin & fiirther marina! M" 15 éaysu The Q0mm§1€ée Shaii canSwer and gsass wieh in accermnce Whti'x iaw, affer aWmi‘iina maper cppaf‘uumty of mamg i0 the gaeiitioraerx The :12et%‘:imer and the oré‘a‘Fcea's cancemed may fiée aéditiomi docamemts. if ngcessary’. The en‘m'e exemse, EncEuéhg paymawt 0f retirai dwea if my, #:o the pe€%‘iione? be wmp€ete§ within a peried a)?" 317x weak§ fmm thé dafe 0f reae§pt of a copy 0f W5 order. ‘fhe pe‘ii’tione? shall sugwy exkfa capy a? ‘ihe pe‘i§‘i§on £0 ihe §eamei£ counsei appaarhg fOf “m {esmndem3 ‘fw fm’wammg ihe "same to the Cammii’tea. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri‘ Judge