IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2551 of 2009 NARAYAN YADAV Versus SRI K.SANTHIL KUMAR & ANR ----------- 05. 01.12.2009 A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner and a show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite party no. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on perusal of Annexure- ‘A’ to the show cause, it would appear that the correction while calculating the payment of gratuity amount has not taken into consideration the amount of D.A. which is also required to be considered while calculating the gratuity amount as the same has been done in the case of such other employee as would be appearing on perusal of the Annexure-6 to the supplementary affidavit contained in Memo No. 815 dated 09.04.2009. Mr. Ajay Bihari Sinha learned counsel for the corporation submits that the said discrepancy shall be looked into and correction, if required, shall be made and payment shall also be made within a period of one week. In view of the above, this contempt application need not proceed further and the same is accordingly, disposed of. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)