1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi COMPANY PETITION (L) NO. 735 OF 2009 WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 144 OF 2010. SPEC Constructions. ..Petitioner. vs. M/s. Wockhardt Hospital Ltd. ..Respondent. .... Mr. Dilip Shukla, for Petitioner. Mr. Karl Tamboly, i/b. Harish Joshi, for Respondent. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 12TH MARCH 2010. P.C. The company petition was dismissed on 10th November 2009 for non-removal of the office objections. By consent of the parties, the company petition is restored to file. Parties undertake to remove office objections and have the company petition numbered within a period of one week from today. 2. Parties have tendered the consent terms dated 12th March 2010 and have submitted that the company petition be disposed of in terms of the consent terms. 2 3. The consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. 4. The consent terms are signed by the partners of the petitioner and the authorised signatory of the respondent company. All the signatories to the consent terms are present in Court. The consent terms are also signed by the respective Advocates of the petitioner as well as the respondents. 5. The company petition is disposed of in terms of the consent terms marked ‘X’, subject to the petitioner removing office objections and getting the company petition numbered within a period of two weeks from today. The company application no. 144 of 2010 is also disposed of. [ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]