IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL C-482 No. 494 of 2008 Tasleem and others .……… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand ……… Respondent Mr. Rajeev Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Government Advocate for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Mr. Sandhu does not want to file any reply. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I feel that this is a fit case where the condition of furnishing the surety bonds from local sureties deserves to be waived. The impugned order dated 2nd July, 2008 is set aside. Also, the order dated 4th June, 2008, imposing the condition of local sureties, is modified to the extent that the petitioners shall be released on bail if they execute the bail bonds in question and furnish the sureties from Bijnor District to the satisfaction of the concerned Magistrate. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 31.7.2008 Avneet