IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2204 of 2008 JAIMANGAL THAKUR & ORS Versus HARINANDAN JHA & ORS ----------- 3/ 22-09-2008 This petition has been filed as Second Appeal No. 140 of 1993 has been dismissed against respondents no. 1(F), 5(ii) and 5(iii) due to delay in compliance of order of this Court dated 21.06.2006. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by order dated 21.06.2006 two weeks time was allowed to the learned counsel for the appellants to take steps for fresh service of notice in appeal matter on the said respondents with their correct and present address but due to inadvertence learned counsel for the appellants was under the impression that one month time had been allowed and hence the said order dated 21.06.2006 was complied on 20.07.2006. Considering the averments made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the statements made in the petition it appears that genuine reasons have been shown. Accordingly, this M.J.C. case is allowed and the aforesaid S.A. No. 140 of 1993 is restored to its original file as against respondents No. 1(F), 5(ii) and 5(iii) and time granted on 21.06.2006 is enlarged till 27.07.2006. Office is directed to proceed and take steps with respect to the said notices already filed by the petitioners. B.Tiwary/ (S.N Hussain,J)