:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2799 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra. ..Applicant. Vs. Anant B. Suryawanshi. ..Respondent. Mrs. A.A.Mane, APP. for the Applicant. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 15th September, 2008 PC : 1. This is an application for leave to file appeal. The accused has been acquitted of the offence punishable Under Section 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. On perusal of the reasons recorded in the judgment and order , I find that the acquittal is based on cogent and acceptable reasons. The amount was not recovered from the person of the accused and recovered from the ground. Though the anthracene powder was found in the pocket, the other articles removed from the same pocket were not found any anthracene powder thereon. The demand of Rs.100/- was held to be doubtful. That the evidence of P.W.No.1 Raju is not in consonance with the FIR. He has not specifically deposed that the accused demanded the bribe of Rs.100/-. In the circumstances, not a fit case to interfere in the appeal against the acquittal. Hence, leave refused. Application is disposed off. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)