IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 28372 of 2007 Between: 1 K.Sumathi W/o.Sankar R/o.H.No.25/185, Ashok nagar, Mancherial, Adilabad District. 2 Smt.E.Jayamma W/o.Balaiah R/o.Sanjeevaiah Colony, Mancherial, Adilabad District. 3 Smt.Sabiya W/o.Mohd. Ali R/o.H.No. 28-182, Hamaliwada, Mancherial, Adilabad District. 4 Smt.Bathula Sharada W/o.Mallesh R/o.H.No.5-2461, Mancherial, Adilabad District. 5 G.Malleshwari W/o.Rajamouli R/o.H.No. 26-81, Hamaliwada, Mancherial, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of A.P. rep. by its Director of Civil supplies, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Adilabad District at Adilabad. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mancherial, Adilabad District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the Proceedings No.CS/293/07, dt.17-3-2007, issued by the 2nd respondent and the consequential Notification Rc.No.D/3236/2006, dt.15-12-2007 issued by the 3rd respondent, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently set-aside the same.” At the hearing, there has been no representation for the petitioners both in the Forenoon and Afternoon sessions. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that they are not interested in pursuing their cause in the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition in default, WPMP.No.3903 of 2008 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is dismissed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 25th APRIL, 2008 kvni