IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 25TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 7565 of 2010() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.74/2010 OF ARYANAD EXCISE RANGE CMP.9424/2010 of J.M.F.C.-I,NEDUMANGAD .................... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED --------------------------- SUKUMARY, D/O. SARASWATHY, MANJADININNA VILA VEEDU, THEVIYARUKUNNU SETTLEMENT, KOTTARAKKAKOM MURI, ARYANAD VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.K.SATHEESH KUMAR SRI.K.S.PRAVEEN RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ---------------------- Bail Application No.7565 of 2010 --------------------- DATED: 25.11.2010 O R D E R In this Petition filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner, who is the sole accused in Crime No.74/2010 of Aryanad Excise Range for offences punishable under Sections 8(1) and (2) of the Abkari Act for allegedly having been found in possession of 5 litres of arrack, seeks her enlargement on bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending, inter alia, that the petitioner is involved in yet another Abkari offence. 3. It is too early to accept the petitioner's contention that she has been falsely implicated in the case. Moreover, I am not satisfied that both the grounds enumerated under sec.41A (b)(ii) of the Abkari Act are present in this case so as to justify her release on bail. With the above observation this Application is dismissed. Dated this the 25 th day of November, 2010. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sj