IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTCS&ARH AT BILASPUR Contempt Case fC) No. ^^y /20t0 %: y< ..^;,,(^, ^..--;:^--^^ ;k ...«:.-^ ..-••'' ^- ^•'". CONTEMNORS/ RESPONDENTS /yssK^. ffrA.t^'^1 1 •^»^te^y,j ^. ' .Ai'/ PETCTCONER : Ku. Shashikala Shukla, D/o Bhojram Shukla, aged about 40 years, Now after marriage Smt. Shashikala Shukla W/oShri K.L Sharma, R/o , Knshnanagar, Daganiya Ward, within timit of Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Tahsil and Distt. Raiur (C.6.) VERSUS 1. Nandkumar, Secretary School Education Department. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. K.R. Pisda, Commissioner, Pubtic Instructions, Department, C.G. (5ovt. Raipur. 3. Sanjay Garg, Cottector, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETCTCON UNbER SECTION 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT READ WITH AkTCCLE 215 OF CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA. \- 'A. ^s^ /^^ XI-HC—78 ^T^T^T^TNT ^STT SH^T'^RT^ p^ Tumaui ^^ •s^r ^n^TcT^r, ^•?ro?, l^rray G-^' C^^Ccf}^^^° ^^^..............................^.................^^Q (^f3^?) ^T<HW ^N-371^1 SB : Hon'ble Shri IVIanindra IVI^han_Shrjvastava. J 11-07-2011 Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate Singh Rajput, counsel for the pet| Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Heard. Respondent No.1^ could paid belatediy. Leamed counse! for the p| Court has aiready been compiie<| passed in the case ofthe petition^r. 'n view of foregoing, 1 ant matter. Accordingfy, the petition is \ under instructions from Shri Anil tioner. c(3unse! for respondent No.2. i^ot be served as process fee has been |rties however submits that order of this vvith and necessary orders have been not inclined to proceed further In the <^iqf^h-qp^f ^ fe^ l^f^H ^^Ra^^T naily disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge •.vs-sy^-^- . -•-•-•^>::^S;^^-?^^°s^;SSSS'^^