IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 2ND SEPTEMBER 2011 / 11TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 22961 of 2011(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- G.BHAGAVAT SINGH, "SAROJ GANGA", NEDUNGOLAM P.O., KOLLAM, NOW RESIDING AT 42/1804-C, ST.BENEDICT ROAD, ERNAKULAM-682 018. BY ADV. SRI.G.BHAGAVAT SINGH (PARTY IN PERSON) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SRI.ANI.B.P, VILLAGE OFFICER, PARAVOOR VILLAGE, PARAVOOR P.O., KOLLAM-691 301. 2. G.JYOTHISH, VILLAGE ASSISTANT, PARAVOOR VILLAGE, PARAVOOR P.O., KOLLAM-691 301. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK KOLLAM, KOLLAM-691 001. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM-691 013. 5. THE COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM-691 013. 6. THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE, OFFICE OF THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER, PUBLIC OFFICES BUILDING, MUSEUM JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 7. K.GOPALAKRISHNAN, KRISHNA VILASAM, NEDUNGOLAM P.O., KOLLAM-691 334. SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASHREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC.22961/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE TP ACCOUNT. P2 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT 23.7.07. P3 COPY OF THE JUDGMETN DT 19.7.07. P4 COPY OF THE LEGAL NOTICE DT 20.5.11. P5 COPY OF THE REPLY DT 1.7.11. P6 COPY OF THE STOP MEMO. P7 COPY OF THE LEGAL NOTICE DT 19.7.11 P8 COPY OF THE PETITION DT 18.7.11. P9 COPY OF THE PETITION DT 6.8.11. P10 COPY OF THE SURVEY PLAN. P11 COPY OF THE NOTICE DT 3.8.11. // True Copy // P.A. To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 22961 of 2011 U ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioner's primary grievance is regarding Ext.P6, a stop memo issued by the Village Officer, Paravoor. It is seen that, aggrieved by the stop memo, Exts.P8 and P9 representations were filed by the petitioner before the fourth respondent and the sixth respondent. Accordingly, the fourth respondent issued Ext.P11 notice, scheduling a hearing on 17.08.2011. There was no progress thereafter. It is at that stage, this writ petition has been filed, challenging Ext.P6 and seeking consequential reliefs. 2. From the submissions made by the learned Government Pleader, what emerges is that, though the hearing was scheduled on 17.08.2011, the matter was adjourned and that there has not been any further hearing. W.P.(C) No.22961/2011 : 2 : In such circumstances, the only order required is that the fourth respondent shall expeditiously complete the proceedings. Accordingly, I dispose of the writ petition directing that the fourth respondent shall expeditiously complete the proceedings pursuant to Ext.P11 with notice to the parties and pass orders thereon. This the fourth respondent shall do, at any rate, within four weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/02/09