IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23359 of 2010 SURESH PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 03.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 420, 406 and 387 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that the complainant paid Rs. 6,90,000/- by cheque to the petitioner and his father but subsequently the sale deeds have not been executed. It is further submitted that the alleged sale deeds have been executed in favour of the family members of the complainant including the daughter of the complainant. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the sale deed has not been executed in his favour. Considering the fact that the sale deeds have been executed to the family members of the complainant, let the petitioner, Suresh Prasad, be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 256 2 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)