IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3968 of 2009 Date of decision: 16th August, 2010 Kishan Lal Verma … Petitioner Versus Jyoti Sahgal … Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Raj Mohan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.L. Batta, Senior Advocate with Mr. M.K. Saajan, Advocate for the respondent. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Admittedly, the petitioner-tenant has vacated the demised premises and has handed over its possession to one Jyoti Sahgal, who had filed the eviction petition. Counsel for the petitioner states that one K.L. Chopra, after the death of his first wife, married Sumitra Devi and transferred the property in question in her favour. The petitioner-tenant claims that he had purchased the demised premises from the sons of first wife of K.L. Chopra, therefore, till the title of Jyoti Sahgal was established, eviction could not be caused. It is further admitted that the sons of first wife of K.L. Chopra had filed a Civil Suit and the petitioner-tenant, being a bonafide purchaser, will step into their shoes. The petitioner claims himself to be the owner of the property. Once he has given possession of the property to Jyoti Sahgal, the relief Civil Revision No.3968 of 2009 sought by the petitioner will be dependent upon the findings of the Civil Court. Hence, no interference is warranted in the present petition, especially when both the courts below have held Jyoti Sahgal to be the lawful successor to the property on the basis of Will. The present petition stands dismissed accordingly. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE August 16, 2010 rps 2