IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Review (T) No. 108/08 Date of decision: 29.3.2011 Vijay Kumar …Petitioner Versus HRTC and anr. ....Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. V.K. Ahuja , Judge (Oral) The petitioner had filed the petition claiming following reilefs:- “i) That the orders of removal dated 25.7.1992 vide Annexure A-2 may be quashed and set-aside. ii) That the respondent Corporation may be directed to re-engage the applicant as Conductor, with all consequential benefits. iii) That the respondent Corporation may be directed to consider the case of the applicant for fresh appointment or re-appointment, in the alternative, as has been done in the cases of persons mentioned in para 6(ix) (n), supra. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment ?. 2 iv) That the applicant may be given the arrears of salary etc. with interest @ 15% per annum, only delayed payments.” 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall be satisfied in case, his case is referred to respondent No. 1 and the writ petition may be treated as representation by respondent No.1. A copy of the writ petition along with a copy of fresh representation, if any, and documents shall be filed by the petitioner before respondent No.1 within one month from today and on receipt of the same, respondent No.1 shall pass appropriate orders in the matter in accordance with law, ignoring Annexure P-1, within another three months adverting to the allegations made in the writ petition as well as in the representation. Keeping in view the assertion made by the petitioner that the similarly placed persons were given relief by respondent No.1 of re-appointment and fresh appointment, in case the petitioner is also found similarly placed person, the same relief shall also be accorded to him along with necessary benefits. 3. The writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. March 29, 2011 ( V.K. Ahuja) (pankaj) Judge.