IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 17TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 26TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 33370 of 2008(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- V.K.KARUNAKARAN ATTUCHIRA VEEDU, VELIYANADU, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.P.REJINARK RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, (DISTRICT MAGISTRATE ALAPPUZHA. 2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KSEB, KIDANGARA, ALLAPPUZHA. 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSEB, ALLAPPUZHA. 4. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. CHACKOCHAN KANAKAMANGALAM HOUSE, VELIYANADU P.O., ALAPPUZHA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BEJOY CHANDRAN BY SC SRI. P.P. THAJUDEEN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No. 33370 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of November, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner is aggrieved by the placing of a transformer. According to the learned Standing Counsel for the Board, the transformer is placed in the property belonging to the fifth respondent. Petitioner has preferred Exts.P1 and P2. Having heard counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P2 in accordance with law with notice to the petitioner, the second respondent and the fifth respondent within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. I make it clear that I have not expressed any view regarding the maintainability or merits of the petition. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb