IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3333 of 2006 Date of decision:13.01.2010. Rajinder Singh @ Rajinder Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Panchayat Payao & Dharamshala Naiwali Sain Samaj Samiti Registered Delhi – Rohtak Road, Bahadurgarh and others. ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. G.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate, for Mr. M.L.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Neetika Sawrup, Advocate, for Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. Learned counsel for the parties state that the point in controversy for adjudication in this case is similar to the one involved in Civil Revision No.4566 of 2003. In that matter, it was found, on point of fact, that the learned Rent Controller did not proceed to make the assessment of the provisional rent etc. which was payable by the tenant on the first date of hearing. It was in acceptance of that factual averment that this Court required the learned Rent Controller to adjudicate upon the factual aspect and record a precise finding about the following fact: - “Whether the tenant – petitioner was evicted in due course of law or in violation of the stay order granted by this Court.” On consensual basis, this petition shall also stand disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in Civil Revision No.4566 of 2003 on 11.01.2008. January 13, 2010 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE