IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.5462 of 2006 Date of Decision:- 28.02.2008 Gopal Krishan ....Petitioner(s) through None. vs. Gurcharanjit Singh Nindra & anr. ....Respondent(s) through None. *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1)Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2)To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3)Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 6.5.2006 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum- Executing Court, Chandigarh whereby upon filing of objections by respondent No.2, certain issues were framed and the case was fixed for evidence of the objector. While adjourning this revision petition, this Court vide order dated March 23, 2007 directed that “meanwhile Executing Court shall also take steps to conclude evidence of the objector and the decree-holder and decide the objections.” No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. On the last two dates also, the petitioner remained unrepresented. It appears that in deference to the above-reproduced directions, the Executing Court might have decided the objections thereby C.R. No.5462 of 2006 -2- rendering this revision petition as infructuous. Be that as it may, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Executing Court that if the objector has yet not concluded his evidence, not more than one opportunity shall be granted to him, followed by reasonable opportunity to the decree-holder and, thereafter, let the objections be decided on or before 31.7.2008. February 28, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE