IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7768 of 2005 1. SUB-INSPECTOR HARICHHETRY, son of late Chandra Bahadur Chhetry, Secretary, Bihar Police Association Patna Branch B.M.P.1 Phulwarisharif ( B.M.P. 19) ).O. B.V.C. Campus, P.S. Gardanibagh, District – Patna. 2. Hawaldar 33 Sudein Lama son of Sri Pemba Ranjan Lama, Secretary, Bihar Police Mens Association Branch B.M.P.1 (Phulwari Sharif) ( B.M.P.19), P.O. BVC Campus, P S – Gardanibagh, Patna. 3. Bhawishwar Sharma son of late Bhagat Krishna Sharma, Secretary, Bihar Police 4th Grade Associaiton B.M.P.1 (BMP-19) Phulwari Sharif, P.O. BVC Campus, P S – Gardanibagh, District – Patna. ____________ Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Home Secretary cum Commissioner, Home Special Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director General cum Inspector General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Additional Director General Military Police, Bihar, Patna. 5. The Inspector General of Police Military Police, Bihar, Patna. 6. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Military Police, Central Division, Bihar, Patna. 7. The Commandant Bihar Military Police-1 (B M P -19), Phulwari Sharif, Patna. 8. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 9. The Home Secretary cum Commissioner, Home Special Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 10. The Director General cum Inspector General of Police, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 11. The Commandant, Jharkhand Military Police -1, Jharkhand, Ranchi. 12. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Military Police-1, Ranchi, Jharkhand. _____________ Respondents **** 06. 13.9.2010 The issue raised by the petitioner is basically a question of accounting between the two States, which has arisen due to bifurcation. This Court has no role to play at this state in the dispute. Petitioner would be well advised to first approach the authorities providing all the materials and then may be a case is made out. The authorities of the 2 State of Bihar and State of Jharkhand may sit down and work out the liability in this regard. Counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of the State of Jharkhand wherein they have categorically stated that the amount, according to them, already stands transferred and acknowledged by the authorities of the State of Bihar and there is no other obligation upon them. Irrespective of the stand taken by the respondent – State of Jharkhand, let the petitioner pursue the matter with an appropriate authority. The writ application is dismissed with liberty as above. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)