IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17313 of 2009 BHOLA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 17.6.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under Sections 323, 465, 468, 471 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the purchaser of the land in question by a registered document executed by the brother of the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that the complainant had claimed that the land in question belongs to him and he had been cheated by execution of said land. Learned counsel for the petitioner also avers that the petitioner is a purchaser for value without any notice or information about the dispute among the brothers. It further transpires that the dispute is of civil nature and learned counsel for the petitioner further avers that this criminal case has been lodged only to put pressure upon the petitioner and co-accused. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. In case of surrender/arrest within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in the court below, petitioner, namely Bhola Yadav shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like - 2 - amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with C. R. No. 938 of 2006 (Trial No. 1862 of 2008), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Kanchan (S. N. Hussain, J.)