^'^^y^^^^^^^^^^f^^^^^^^^^^^^^ i COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH AT BILASPUj Petitioner 1. .srreofiooz Chandra Mohan Hirv/ani Age about 47 years, Asstt. Teacher, S/o. LateShri Narayan La! Sahu Govt. Primary School, Murmunda, Donaarcsarh, Dlstt. - ResDQndents. Versus 1. ?ajnandgaon(C.G.) Saidyanath Nagendra, Age about 44 years, Asstt. Teacher, S/o Late Shri Dhoia Lal Nagendra, Govt. Primary School, Budhasagar, tock - Chhuikhadan, Distt. - Rajnandgaon (C.G.5 State Government of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Tribal & Education Department D.K.S. ihawai'i, Raipur (C.G.) District Educatlon Officer Ralnandgaon, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) iSU. (Writ Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of Indla) Sinate Bench: Hon'ble Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Present : Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counse! for the petltioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. G.A. for ths State/respondents. '^•' (Passed on 3'" Juty, 2007) The petltioners No.1 and 2 were appointed on 13.09.1982 (Annexure P-1) and 28.06.1982 (Annexure P-2) respectlvely, as AssisSant Teachers on fixed pay scale of Rs.150,'-. After comptetion of two year probation, theyweregranted payscale of Rs.169-300/-. 2. Learned counse! appeariny for She petitioners submlts-that the issue invoived in the case is as to whether, the petitioners are entitled to reguiar pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. i. The issue inyolved, hereln was considered by the Madhya Pradesh Administrative Trlbunai, Jabalpur In O.A. No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 othero vs. SSate of M.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similar'y situated teaehers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. thc of initlal appointment. The matter was taken-up to the Hon'ble Supreme court in Special Leave Petition (Civll) No.6892/93. The said petltion was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the dedslon of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scaie from date of inlSiai appointment. 4, Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners further submits that thi? Court, while considering the same Issue in Ravishankar Patel Vs. State ofChhattisgarh and others (W.P.(S) No.893 of 2007) by order dated 14.02.2007, has granted regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of initial ippojntment. - 1 >. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that this is squarely covered by the declslon of this Court in the case of Savlshankar Pate! Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others (Supra). 6. In view of that, this petition is altowed in the same terms. No /*t!i'^S? ^&i? *ft s'"-^^^'- VjUd ^15 IU Uv&l^. Indu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotrl -.^^^udge