IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.532 of 2009 LAXMI SAH & ORS Versus RAMDEO SAH & ORS ----------- 3 08.04.2009 The judgment debtor has filed this revision application against the order dated 18.02.2009 passed by Munsif – Ist, Begusarai in Title Execution Case No. 11 of 2007 by which the application of the judgment debtor under Section 47 of the C.P.C has been rejected by the said application. The judgment debtor had claimed that since the land decreed in the suit is not identifiable as the description of the land is vague in the suit, the decree is unexecutable. The trial court has rejected the said petition of the judgment debtor taking into account that in the suit a Survey Knowing Pleader Commissioner was appointed and who had already carved out the disputed property. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to some parts of the report of the Pleader Commissioner filed in the suit to show that the said report of the Pleader Commissioner is not very clear. So far as identification of the two dhoor and twelve and half dhurkies of land is concerned which has been decreed in favour of the plaintiff, this court is not inclined to go into the meticulous examination of the Pleader Commissioner report for coming to any conclusion with regard to the identification of the said disputed land. Therefore, this revision application is disposed of with a direction to the learned court below to take necessary steps as may be required in the interest of justice to get the land identified before passing any final orders in the execution - 2 - case for delivery of possession of the plot to the decree holder. With the above observations, the revision application is disposed of. Kundan (J. N. Singh, J.)