c 6s (0-z?7— SiNSLE s" IN THE HON»BLBHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. 33^/^/2010 PETITIONBR. A^! ^y ^ .^ Bhajan Lal Dahare (B.L.Dahare) S/o Chini Ram Dahare aged about 56 years, Lecturer, Government High School, Kanshigarh Block-Jaijaipur Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ^"y;/- '<€'^ ^ VERSUS RBSPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: - Secretary, Department ofEducation Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer, District Janjgir-Champa(C.G.) 3. Principal Govt. High School, Kanshigarh Block-Jaijaipur Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. ^. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.3346/2010 Bhajan Lal Dahare (B. L. Dahare) Versus State of Chhatti^arh and (Xhers )NSrrUTtONOFINDIA Present: - Shri Ashwani Shukla, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 09th July, 2010) The petitioner was initially appointed as Deputy Teacher on a fixed pay <rf Rs.100/-. After comptetton of their probation period, he was granted regular pay scaleofRs.169-300/-. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petifioner submitted that the issue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitted to regular pay scale with effect from the date <rf inHfiaJ appointment or after complelion of probatkwi period. 3. The issue involved herein was considered by ttie Madhya Practosh State Administrative Tribunal. Jabalpur in OANo.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu anel 56 Ottiei^ v. State ofM.P. & otfte/s), wherein it was held that ttie similariy situated teachers are entiUed to regular pay scale wth effect from ttie date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon'bte Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'bte Supreme Court uphokfing the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment. <ft A. ' ^"%.. .^^f^^ '^ ^^.^ ^^s^". \3 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submtts that this Court, white consjdering the same jssue in Amar Saf Ram A Othws v. State af ChhaWsgarh & Others, W.P.(S).No.4725/2006. by order dated 01-09-2006, allowed the petitioners to make a representation wlthin a period of ten days, raising all the grievanc^. 5. Accordingly. the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation raising all grievances in lightofthe aforestated judgment and the circular dated 13-01-2009 (Annexure P-2) and in turn, the concemed respondent is directed to decide the representation. if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits. within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, subject toverification of the facts. 6. In view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge