IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1521 of 2008 MD.ALI AYUB ANSARI Versus SYED SAHABUSSIN RAJA & ANR ----------- 2. 26.9.2008 Heard Mr. Satyavrat Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. This Court would not find any reason as to why the petitioner’s father had made his prestige issue not to produce her daughter in the court. The court has every reason to pass such an order and issue direction in this regard at least for ascertaining personal view of the daughter of the petitioner in a matter relating to restitution of conjugal right. The court cannot substitute its views in such matrimonial matter specially when making effort for amicable settlement is the part of the duty enjoined upon the court below while dealing with the matrimonial matter. That being so, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order save and except to record an undertaking of Mr. Verma, that the petitioner would produce her daughter within a period of two months from the date of 2 receipt/production of a copy of this order. Coercive measure of her production through the police will accordingly remain suspended for a period of four months i.e. till 26th January 2009. With the aforementioned observations, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/