IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.1652 of 2007. Writ Petition No.1652 of 2007. Writ Petition No.1652 of 2007. Nagri Nivara Parisha & Others ..Petitioners versus B.M.C. & Others ..Respondents Mr.Rajiv Patil a/w. Mr. Dushyant Purekar for the Petitioner Mr.P.A.Purandare for the B.M.C. Mr.D.A. Nalawade, G.P. for the state. Mr.G.D.Utanagale i/b. Utangale & Co for the SRA- respondent No.3. Coram : Swatanter Kumar, C.J. & Coram : Swatanter Kumar, C.J. & Coram : Swatanter Kumar, C.J. & V.M.Kanade, J. V.M.Kanade, J. V.M.Kanade, J. Dated : 2nd April, 2008 Dated : 2nd April, 2008 Dated : 2nd April, 2008 P.C. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3, Slum Rehabilitation Authority submits that vide letter dated 18th July, 2007 the Corporation has granted permission to the respondent to connect the septic tanks through the nala to the main drainage pipe, and they would do it in the manner so that it does not in any way prejudice the rights of the petitioner. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the Corporation however submits that they shall -2- disconnect the same if they need to provide a open drainage. The Corporation shall consider this aspect only after the respondent No.3 has connected the septic tank to the main drainage system, and that too after hearing the petitioners. They will complete it expeditiously, not later than three months. . Writ Petition disposed of in above terms. ( Chief Justice.) ( Chief Justice.) ( Chief Justice.) (V.M.Kanade, J.) (V.M.Kanade, J.) (V.M.Kanade, J.)