'-? ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CIVIL REVISION.NO. =? t^> / 03 APPLICANT & ;'ii'' f son of Late Shrl Ram Sai, aged about 24 years, resident of village - Fatehpur/ pollce station — Jainagar, Tah. Surajpur Distt. Surguja (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS NON-APPLICANT None / CIVIL REVISION ONDER SECTION 115 OF THECODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 :I-HC-22 3^ '<ii<<ici<f, aixny'is, Rcii«y IIICTI sn*ii%' 3ll^iui?l<h ^.JC^.%63 W[ 2003 f^a -•?n^?r^T )^:iNf3:n^T 5h*11°h ^i^d 3TI^T?RfRK^feT t>l<<fl!1<(l'1'<IH(lT ff te^t' <(»]«!< %3if^ir-w^T 4.5.2005 Shri Sushil Dubey, Heard on admission. This revision has beei\ dated 8.5.2003 by which t| Surajpur has partly allowed t withdrawal of the amount of with Bank. It is subnnitted that deposifon the name of the directed that as per 1+ie amount shall be permitted to I don't find any reason the Additional Cbims Tribunal to show any material illegali 8.5.2003. The revision stouids opplicomt to file subsequent arises in his fayour. cour^sel for the appliamt. terlms te directed against the impugned order le learned Additional Claims Tribunal, ie application filed by the applicant for compensation, kept in the fixed deposit a sum of Rs.28,203/- is in 'the fixed appticant. Learned claims tribunal has of avuard, only interest part of the withdrawn by the applicant. to interfere with the order passed by as no'substantive grounds are ma.de. out ty or irregularity in the order dated disib I^JVi^^ hs-- lissed. However, this order,not bar the J'i-^^V^l applicant in future if any eventuality Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge (•flds(<3*l) ,..-••-/