1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.22 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.22 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO.22 OF 2006 M/s Omkar Arts, Thane ...Petitioner Versus The Divisional Joint Registrar, & Ors. ...Respondents. Shri C.A.Joshi i/b Meghraj & Associates for petitioner. Shri R.S.Ghade with A.S.Desai for Respondent Nos.2 & 3. Shri Paresh Madkaikar for Respondent No.5. Shri A.H.Palekar A.G.P for State. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 20th JANUARY, 2006. DATE : 20th JANUARY, 2006. DATE : 20th JANUARY, 2006. P.C. 1. It appears that the only reason why this Writ Petition is filed is because the petitioner was apprehensive that the revision application preferred to the Divisional Joint Registrar is not being taken up for consideration because that post is vacant and charge is not handed over. 2 Today, the position is that the petitioner’s main revision petition and interim application are both un-decided. 2. The learned A.G.P informs me that Dr.Mane has taken charge of the post of Divisional Joint Registrar and he would be disposing of this Revision Application. In the light of this statement, the grievance of the petitioner does not survive. The petitioner to appear before the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai on 6th February, 2006 and the Divisional Joint Registrar shall thereafter proceed with the matter. The order passed by this Court on 5th January, 2006 to continue till the revision application is disposed of. All contentions on merits are expressly kept open. Revision application to be disposed of as expeditiously as possible within a period of two weeks from the date the parties appear before the Divisional Joint Registrar. 3 (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)