1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1212 OF 2010 (Kailash A. Sambhoj vs. Assistant Registrar, Coop. Societies & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JULY 29, 2010. Heard Shri Meghe, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sonare, learned AGP for respondents No.1 & 2. One of the grounds for holding the petitioner disqualified is taking loan in the name of one Raju Vijay Wasekar, though said Raju has never applied for the same. Shri Meghe, learned counsel argues that said Raju had applied and in fact he cleared the loan in 2007 and there is also a No due certificate issued on 01.11.2007. The learned AGP has invited attention to the reply filed by the petitioner to show cause notice under Section 78 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, to show that it nowhere specifically states that Raju had applied and Raju has repaid the loan. The perusal of reply shows that the amount was to be deposited equally by the Ex-President and Ex- Secretary as the Auditor has found that Ex-President and Ex-Secretary are equally responsible for it. The repayment of amount is not a answer to the charge. The 2 petitioner could not point out that loan was sanctioned to Raju by passing any resolution. It is important to note that he has produced resolution dated 05.02.2006 by procuring it from administration to press for his exoneration from other charge. However, there is no such effort in relation to this loan. The finding is concurrent and in the interest of purity of Co-operative administration. Therefore, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in writ petition. Writ Petition is dismissed. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.