i.,l:li IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH M.C.C. No. l^_ /2006 IN F.A. N0. 547/1996 ^PPELLANT ^ ^ -Vijay Kumar Namdeo S/o Lalji Namdeo aged about 36 years, Resident of Near Rojgar office Budhar at Present resident of Kota District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ^ESPONDENTS .•y.s's. »iT^.~ •y <^~* _'"°'':^ •^a°-\- •^&a.fe^ ,s?. ^r^ 2. ?tete;Vi'i "%'-<, %.., %;'•«-»-. State Bank of India, a banking , Company constituted under the State Bank of India, Act 1955 through its Branch Manager, Branch Belgahma tahsil Kota District Bilaspur (C.G) Block Devlopment Officer Block Devlopment Office, Kota District Bilaspur (C.G.) APPLICATION UNDER ORDER41 RULE^9 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE FOR RE-ADMISSION/RESTORATION QF THE CASE. XI-HC-22 ^c? 'airaicra, 's^pre, r«f<fi'My ^ _..^cc,.A!S.^l SII^I^iT Ki-ii.tti 3ii^?r ^^ ^I?a SIT^T^RITWdft^ chi<4f<nt4lTi 'W^ ^ t^T^ '(.nn't-^K ^? srf^iq sn^i <- •a-v 'adma 20.04.2006 Shri Hemant Kesharwani, None for the respondent. Learned counsel for the a|^p noone appeared on behalf of the may be disposed of without notice^ Considered. Allowed. Heard. I am satisfied with the sufficient cause to appear on called-out for hearing, hence, M.j Appeal No.547/1996 that was appearance of the applicantis resjti A copy of this order be kepjt ci^unsel for the applicant. riplicant submits that on 28.02.2006, ^espondent. Therefore, this petition to respondents. faist fdpt that appticont was prevented by 28.02.2006, when the case was :.C.No.l85/2006 is allowed and First <jismissed on 28.02.2006 for- want of resjtored to its original number. in First^ggealJ'lo.547/1996^ Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge