BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twelfth day of July Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.8514 of 2011 VIJIMON ..PETITIONER/1st ACCUSED Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU, THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE COLACHAL POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. ( S.C.NO.56 OF 2007 ) ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.ARUL Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 366(A) and 417 of I.P.C in S.C.No.56 of 2007 on the file of the Sub-Court, Padmanabhapuram, Kanyakumari District and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that Non-Bailable Warrant is pending against the petitioner from the year 2009 in S.C.No.56 of 2007 and he apprehend arrest in pursuant to the Non-Bailable Warrant issued against him by the Sub-Court, Padmanabhapuram, Kanyakumari District. He would further submit that because of his livelihood, the petitioner left Tamil Nadu and now he is in Kerala. He would further submit that the petitioner has already married the victim girl. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) would submit that Non-Bailable Warrant is pending against the petitioner from the year 2009 and hence he prayed for dismissal of this petition. 4.Considering the rival submissions made on both sides and also considering the fact that the petitioner was not able to appear before the trial Court and as such, the trial Court has issued the Non Bailable Warrant against him in the year 2009, I am not inclined https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, this Court is inclined to direct the petitioner to surrender before the Sub-Court, Padmanabhapuram, Kanyakumari District, and to file a petition for bail before the learned judge and in the event of filing such an application, the learned Judge is directed to consider the same and pass orders on merit and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. With the above direction, the petition is disposed of. sd/- 12/07/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, PADMANABHAPURAM, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 3 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE COLACHAL POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. T.ARUL Advocate SR.No.22514 akm/13.07.11 /2p-5c/ ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.8514 of 2011 Date :12/07/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/