IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5797 of 2006 RAHUL KUMAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 04. 16.11.2010 Fact is that petitioner has already been accommodated or appointed on a Class IV post on compassionate ground. Merely because recommendation was made at a point of time to consider his case for appointment on Class III post, it does not give him a right as such because in terms of the policy of the government no compassionate appointment can be made on a Class III post as such posts are promotional post and/or are filled up by direct recruitment. Petitioner should be more than happy with such an appointment since such appointments verge on violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. The writ application has no merit. It is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)