-1- Civil Revision No.1105 of 2011 (O&M). IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Date of Decision: February 16, 2011. Civil Revision No.1105 of 2011 (O&M). Mahesh Kumar ... Petitioner VERSUS Rohit Kumar ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL. 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. S.R. Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- MOHINDER PAL, J. Defendant-petitioner, whose defence has been struck off by the trial Court when he (defendant-petitioner) failed to file written statement and reply to stay application in a suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent even after a period of more than 90 days had elapsed, is before this Court by way of filing this revision -2- Civil Revision No.1105 of 2011 (O&M). petition for setting aside the said order of the trial Court and allowing him the relief prayed for. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the interests of justice, instead of issuing notice of this petition to the plaintiff-respondent, I deem it expedient to dispose this petition of by ordering the trial Court to allow the petitioner-defendant to file written statement and reply to the stay application subject to his (defendant-petitioner) depositing costs of Rs.7500/- before it (trial Court). Ordered accordingly. In case the costs are paid, the same shall be paid to the plaintiff- respondent. Resultantly, the impugned order is set aside and this petition is allowed to the extent indicated above. ( MOHINDER PAL ) February 16, 2011. JUDGE ak