IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5181 of 2003 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.02.2009 Shashi Bhushan .............. Petitioner Vs. The Shahabad Farmers Co-op Marketing-cum-processing Society Ltd. ............Respondent Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Sio, Advocate for Mr. Balbir Singh, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? -.- K.KANNAN, J.(ORAL) 1. Mr. S.S. Sio representing the learned counsel on record for the respondent states that the counsel for revision petitioner had made a statement before Court at the previous hearing that the tenant had already vacated the premises and that civil revision had become infructuous. 2. I find no record of such statement as having been made on the previous hearing. However, the learned counsel for revision petition is not present before the Court at the time when the matter is called. The civil revision petition is dismissed for default of non- prosecution. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE February 18, 2009 Pankaj*