1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL LODGING NO. 428 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 524 OF 2009 Jayantilal Damji Pandit ....Appellant Versus Seth Cursondas Natha ....Respondent Shri Mahendra Agavekar, Advocate i/b. H. Kumar Vaidyanathan. Shri Sanjay Udeshi, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : P. B. MAJMUDAR & R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED : 5th DECEMBER, 2009. P.C.: Appeal is taken for admission, today. The Registry is directed to give appropriate number to the Appeal. 2. Heard, learned Counsel for the Appellant and Respondent. The learned Single Judge, in our view, has rightly found that this is not a case where claim could have been decided under section 33C (2) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The learned Judge has rightly found that the issue involved in the matter cannot be decided under section 33C (2) of the Act and if the Appellant has any grievance in this behalf, he can raise appropriate dispute before the Industrial Court. We are in agreement with the reasoning given by the learned Single Judge. The Appeal is accordingly, dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (R. V. MORE, J.) (P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.)