-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SUO MOTU CONTEPT PETITION NO. 146 OF 1991 SUO MOTU CONTEPT PETITION NO. 146 OF 1991 SUO MOTU CONTEPT PETITION NO. 146 OF 1991 IN C.A. NO. 1956 OF 1991 IN A.O.NO. 456 OF 1991 Dilip Manohar Pise .. Appellant in C.A.No.1956/91. V/s. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay .. Respondents in C.A.1956/91. And Shri V.B.Pawar .. Contemnor. --- Mr. K.K.Singhvi, Sr.Advocate with R.A.Malandkar & A.J.Bhor for the Respondents. --- CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATED : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATED : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2007. DATED : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2007. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. :- . This action for contempt has been initiated by this court in respect of the order of this court restraining the municipal corporation from dealing with or disposing of the stall. None appears on behalf of the appellant/ petitioner. 2. Mr.Singhvi, the learned counsel for the -: 2 :- municipal corporation points out to the affidavit of Shri V.B.Pawar, Ward Officer, K-East Ward of the corporation, who has stated that a compound wall was constructed and no stall by name Sai Baba Seva Stall was seen on the said plot by the officer. What could be seen was only a telephone booth and the officer only lifted that telephone booth and placed it outside the line of the compound wall. That telephone booth has been allotted to the original plaintiff by the Vijay Merchant Rehabilitation Centre for the disabled. The officer has therefore, stated that he is not guilty of demolishing any stall contrary to the order of the court as alleged. It is not possible to see any material to the contrary. 3. In the circumstances, the rule is hereby discharged. Contempt petition is dismissed. (S.A.BOBDE,J.) .....