IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Crim. Writ Petition No.154 2006 Mr.Sadalshiv K.Lad ..Petitioners vs. 1. State Govt.of Maharashtra and ors ‘ ..Respondents Shri Vilas Mali for petitioner (absent) Shri D.S.Mhaispurkar, A.P.P. for respondent State. CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. 5th December,2006 5th December,2006 5th December,2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner is absent. 2. The proceedings pending before the Competent Authority respondent no.2 are in respect of the transfer of property namely flat of MHADA in the name of son of respondent no.3. In the said proceedings naturally the petitioner will have an opportunity of addressing the said authority. We find that the dispute between the parties is a civil dispute and there is nothing to be enquired into through the criminal machinery. Unnecessarily the criminal machinery is tried to be set in motion. We refrain to interfere with the pertition. Petition is rejected. (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.)