ASN 1 RPL-38.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION LODGING NO.38 OF 2011 Harita Sunil Parab. ..Petitioner. Vs. University of Mumbai and ors. ..Respondents. Petitioner present in person. Mr. Nilesh Ukey i/by R.A.Rodrigues for Respondents. CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C. J. AND SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J. 07 September 2011 PC: We have heard the petitioner in person as well as the learned counsel for the respondent University. 2 We do not find any merit in the review application. The case of the petitioner is that she may be exempted with remark ‘Pass’ in all the three papers of the first semester and two papers of the second semester. Review Application is therefore, dismissed with the clarification that once the petitioner passes the examination in all the three papers of the first semester and two papers of the second semester in November 2011, the petitioner’s case will be considered for further studies in accordance with the relevant ordinance of the University. ASN 2 RPL-38.sxw 3 As far as the examination of three papers of the first semester is concerned, since the petitioner had paid fees for the said examination in April 2011 and the petitioner was not allowed to appear for the examination, we direct that the petitioner’s application for permission to appear for examination in the said three papers of the first semester to be conducted in November 2011 is concerned, the petitioner is not required to pay any fees. CHIEF JUSTICE SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.