2806mca538.11.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR M.C.A.NO.538 OF 2011 IN S.A.NO.495 OF 2010 (d) Miresh Ravindrabhai Sheth ..vs.. The Distt.Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies and ors. M.C.A.NO.539 OF 2011 IN S.A.NO.473 OF 2010 (d) Miresh Ravindrabhai Sheth ..vs.. The Recovery Officer, Janta Sahakari Bank Ltd. and ors. ............................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................... Mr. Anand Dixit, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. H.R.Gadhia, Adv. for respondent no.2. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : 28th June, 2011. By the above civil applications, the applicant/original appellant seeks review of the order dated 17/2/2011 passed in the above Second Appeals, by which order the Second Appeals came to be dismissed on the ground that no substantial question of law was involved therein. The review is sought on the grounds inter alia mentioned in the above Civil Applications. A perusal of the said grounds and upon hearing the learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, it appears that the applicant wants to re- 2806mca538.11.odt 2 argue the matter on the points which have already been dealt with, and in support of the said points seeks to rely upon certain judgments of the Apex Court. This court on consideration of the above Second Appeals had come to a conclusion that the above Appeals do not involve any substantial question of law and that the applicant herein is only a front for his father Ravindrabhai Sheth who has not fulfilled his obligation under the compromise award. It is further observed that the entire endeavour appears to be to stall the execution of the said compromise award. In my view, on perusal of the grounds as also after hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, no case for review on the grounds as contemplated under Order 47 of the Civil Procedure Code is made out. The above Civil applications are accordingly rejected. JUDGE chute