IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18000 of 2011 1. GEETA DEVI 2. BRAHMDEO SAO 3. NAND KISHORE PRASAD KESHRI 4. GAYATRI DEVI Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3 24.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the family members of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the husband of the complainant died after five years of the marriage. It is alleged that the family members of the husband are not allowing the complainant to enjoy the share of husband's ancestral property. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instruction, submits that the petitioners have no objection in allowing the complainant to enjoy her husband 's share. Let the petitioners file an affidavit to that effect before the learned court below which will be 2 transmitted to the concerned police station by learned court below. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 1070/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The violation of undertaking given before this Court by the petitioners will give liberty to the complainant to file an application for cancellation of the bail of the petitioners. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)