(^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATTI ® m TAXCASENO. ^-s OF 2010 /-APPELLANT I.!.??•^ (.f,;.^^- ',1.0' .'...l.r-' Versus ^ESPONDENT JNIONOFINDIA THROUGH COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE BHAWAN, DHAMTARI ROAD, TIKARAPARA, RAIPUR (C.G.) 492-001 1/S JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD., MACHINERYDIVISION 13 KM. STONE, G.E. ROAD, N.H.N0.6, RAIPUR(CG) APPEAL UNDER SECTION 35-G OF THE CENTRAL EXCISE ACT, 1944 READ WITH SECTION 83 OF THE FINANCE ACT, 1994 ^xk. s^^^, ^^^^^ ^y' .^ ^^^^- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Division Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri & Hon'ble Shri Radhe Shyam Sharma, JJ. APPELLANT RESPONDENT TAXCASE73QF2010 Union of India Versus M/s Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. (Appeal under Section 35-G ofthe Central ExciseAct, 1944 read with Section 83 ofthe Finance Act, 1994) Present:~ None for the petitioner. Shri Varunendra Mishra,Advocate for the respondent. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 15th day of July, 2011) 1. The matter was listed on 22-6-2010, 28-7-2010, 14-9-2010, 28-10-2010, 8-12-2010, 27-1-2011 & 14-2-2011. On most ofdates on the request of learned counsel appearing for the appellant, the case was adjourned, Today when the case is listed and called for hearing twice, none appears nor is any representation made on behalf ofthe appellant. 2. Having regard to the facts situation of the case and conduct of the appellant, we have no other option than to dismiss the case for want ofprosecution. 3. Consequently, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Gowri Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Sd/- R.S. Sharma Judge