HHIH CGURT OF CHEATTE§GARH AT BILASPUR ‘v‘v/rit Petiiioii (3‘; N0. 769$ of 20W PETETE§NERS b) ‘J‘l ‘b5ma t a m G\ . Mahesh Kumar S/o Lakslnnaiya, aged about 25 years, R/o Gram Fanchayat Lingagiri, Janpau Y 1 "rancnayat ‘ Usoor, District Dantewada‘ Ku. Timnmla? Dv’a Kilaiyya, aged abQut 23 years, R/o Gram J{\ Fanc‘nayat Funidi, Janpaé Panchayai Usoor, Distridt Damsixfaé, (CG). Krishna Kumar, SI‘O SR. Moria, agai about 24 yeaxs, R10 Gram Panchayat Usmn‘, Eallpad Pamhayat, USoor, District Daniewada (CG). ‘ Niraniar, Sfo Marse31 Toppog aged ahgut 27 years, R/o Gram Panchayi Nukanpai, Janpad Panchayat Usoor, District, Dantewada (CG). Smt. ianki, Wk) Hitandra Dhmva, agad about 23 years R/o Gram Panchayat Ugam‘, District Dantawada (CG). Manoj Kumar, 3/0 Arjun Aibam, aged about 25 years, R/o Ox Gram Panehayat. Tarrem, Janpad Pamhayat Usoor, District Dantewada (CG). VERSUS State of Chhattiggarh, Thiough 111a Searetary, Dgpammm of Panchayai & Rum} Dcveiopmant, Mantraiaya, DKS Bhawan. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. . The Cemissicnar, ChhattiSgar Empioymem Guamntee Cammil, Vikas Agmkt Karyalaya, Viiag Bhawan? Civit Lines, Raipur {CG}. . Unimt Qf Ittdia, Thmtsgh the: Secretary, Mir1istry of Rural Davciopment rNew Y Baird. . District Programme Coordinator (Ceallgctor) under the Nationai Rurai Empioymen’t Guarantee Act, 20(5 Usoor, Drstriet Dantawsi {C(31) . Janpaci Fanchayat. Useor. Chief Executiye Officer. DiStrict Dztlttgwada, (CG). Zita Fanchayat US$01; Through the Chief Executive Officer, Usoor. District Dantewada (CG). (WRIT PETYTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITU'HON OF INDIA) (SB: Hmi‘bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotril J.) Shri ES. Khare. Advocate for the petitioiierS. Shri AS, Kae‘nhwaha, Deputy Advocate Generai for the State/respondent N0. 1, 7. R 4. " Shri SK. Beriwai, Standing Counsei for the respondent No, 3. aj, Advocate for the respondent N0. 5 & 6. B xi ‘J Sim Sumesh GRAI, .. 0R3ER gm fh , r'm A (‘r‘assei‘u‘ on miS 25 u; Immed emitteel nmtearirig far the. resiJeitdeiit N0. 5 aitfi 6 has filed an attidavit cinted 20112 f7.““8 stating that rtc grievaiice 0f the petitionerg retitaiits for adjitdigatiggj (m all the pptxtmnem have keen considered Fm re qppnmtpmnt. da : m- Tha netitionar N0. 3,4 and, 5 haw: béan m-appoimed as Gram Rozgar SahayakS on L9 co:1tr.,ct baas‘ TEL. pejtiimsr Na 2 i3b?ahiex§ LBSS 1,,arks, ,hargfbre mt rs-appointed e111 N0. 1 aLd 55.1 i1 t3 r33 armoi: ‘émeut procESS. I: 1- K fih “LIaw“ Svbmitie-uf} thai mgpol 6 was n0? annxidgrer§ Jjr .6—app9in‘tma; . m1. 36601.11j of flair r} Ensf vear V ¥ ‘ v H In Viéw of‘ ma cigar and categorieal statA’mL w) r ‘ A. ‘r .r ‘ V.”aK, w 4 Lemmd couasel apifafigg f0: tlL petiti01.ers subinitS that thg Datitioa has bamme a,t h i humus as nothing survivas ig this magm; 1:1 view of tl‘a -njiagoing, iii, writ patiticrn is dismiSsed N having bsmms J'I .1 iia€ru6hmug NO 0rd=3r 3:330 CDS‘ES. mrmamg in tha w 1 “* Sdl- Sahu Satish K. Agnihotri Judge