IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2010 / 17TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 17813 of 2009(V) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. MR. ARUN A.C., S/O.CHANDRABOSE, AMBAZHAPPULLY HOUSE, PO, MULAMKUNNATHUKAVU, GRAMALA, THRISSUR- 680 581. 2. MR.SUMESH K.V.S/O.VELAYUDHAN, KARUMATH VALAPPIL VEEDU, PO, PORKKULAM, PAZHANJI (VIA), THRISSUR DIST. 3. MR.SANTHOSH KUMAR P.B, S/O.BALACHANDRAN, THEKE MEPPULLY VEDU, KALLEPPIDY ROAD, PO.MULAMKUNNATHUKAVE, THRISSUR - 680 581. BY ADV. SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN SRI.K.M.ANEESH RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. KERALA INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL ADMINISTRATIO N, MULANGUNNATHUKAVU, THRISSUR, PIN-680 581, REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY FOR LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. *ADDL. R3 TO R8 IMPLEADED. 3. SANTHOSH K.S., DAILY WAGE WORKER, KERALA INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, MULANGUNNATHUKAVU, THRISSUR PIN 680 581. 4. NAJLA K.M., DAILY WAGE WORKER, KERALA INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL ADMINISTRATION MULANGUNNATHUKAVU, THRISSUR PIN 680 581. W.P.(C) NO.17813/2009 5. GIRISH K., DAILY WAGE WORKER, DO. DO. 6. ABDUL RASHEED, DAILY WAGE WORKER DO. DO. 7. A.K.BALAKRISHNAN, DAILY WAGE WORKER, DO. DO. 8. K.VINOD, DAILY WAGE WORKER, DO. DO. *ADDL. 3 TO R8 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DT. 15.7.2009 IN IA. 8510/2009. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, SRI.M.SAJJAD. R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH R3 & R8 BY SRI. KALEESWARAM RAJ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.17813/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION AND RULES. P2:- COPY OF THE BYE LAWS KERALA INSTITUTE OF LOCAL ADMINISTRATION , THRISSUR. P3:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.G.O.(RT) NO.402/2007/LSGD DTD. 7.2.2007 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P4:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION OF THE 2ND PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT DT. 1.4.09. P5:- COPY OF THE REPLY OF THE 2ND PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT DTD. 15.5.09. P6:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 28.5.09 FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. P7:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 2.6.2009 FILED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).17813/09 -------------------- Dated this the 8th day of July, 2010 JUDGMENT The 1st prayer in the writ petition reads as under:- To issue a writ of mandamus or such other appropriate writ, direction or oder and to direct the respondent to strictly follow Ext.P2 bye-law and Ext.P3 order while making appointments in 1st respondent 2. In paragraph 12 of the counter affidavit filed by the 1st respondent, it is stated thus, “Hence no action contrary to set procedure will be allowed or attempted. The appointments are made by virtue of powers vested as per clauses 3, 4 and 5 of Para 9 and clause (xix) of Para 40 of the Rules and clause (k) bye-law Nos.3, 4 and 5 of service byelaws.” W.P.(C).17813/09 2 3. In view of this, the grievance covered by 1st prayer shall stand redressed. As far as the party respondents are concerned, petitioners are not seeking any relief against them. Therefore recording the submission in paragraph 12 of the counter affidavit, writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs