IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.4228 of 2011 ==================================================== Jeetendra Narayan Singh son of Late T.N. Singh, resident of Das Lane, Lohanipur Police Staton, Kadam Kuan, District-Patna - Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India through the Secretary, GOI, Ministry of Human Resources Development Department, New Delhi. 2. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Government of Bihar, H.R.D., Deptt. Secretariat, Patna. 3. The C.B.S.E. through its Regional Director, Civil Lines, Allahabad. 4. The National Open School through its Regional Director, Lalit Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 5. The NVS through its Dy. Commissioner, Boring Road, Patna. 6. The District Magistrate, Buxar. 7. The Superintendent of Police, Buxar. 8. The Principal, J.N.V., Buxar -Respondents- Respondents ==================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate & Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent No.1: Mr. Devendra Kr Sinha, A.A.G-2 For the Respondent No.5: Mr. J.P. Karn, Senior Advocate For Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 : Mr. Anant Kumar, A.C. to A.A.G.-2 For the Respondent No.8: Mr. S.K. Thakur, Advocate ==================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2 2 07.03.2011 The petitioner complains that in the 10th standard Board Examination conducted by the Central Board of Secondary Education in the year 2009, some students took the examination in proxy. The respondent No.8 the Principal, Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Navanagar spared some students to impersonate the concerned examinees. Nevertheless, no inquiry about the aforesaid irregularity committed in the year 2009 is conducted. Learned advocated Mr. Sanjay Kumar has appeared for the petitioner. He candidly admits that the petitioner has not made complaint in the subject matter to the concerned authority. In absence of a formal complaint made by the petitioner; a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution filed in public interest, two years after the cause of action cannot be maintained. The petition is summarily rejected. Bibhash (R.M. Doshit, CJ.) (Jyoti Saran, J.)