@7 \e>9\91§ PETITIONER : Sujan Singh, S/o Shri Darshan Singh aged about 65 years, R/o hamund (.G.) Versus : Lambodar Dehari, S/o Narayan' Deharl, aged about 41 years, R/o ViHage Jhankarpali, via Dhanupali, Poce Station jomura, Distt. Sambalpur (Orissa State) {Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Cri Procedure, 1973} minal Present : Ms. Morisha Kshatri, counsel for the petitioner. ‘ ' - ORAL ORDER (8-9-2009) 1. Tis petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. s directed against the order ted 12-2—2008 passed by the Additlonal Sessions Judge, Mahasamund in Criminal Revisio No.65/7, affirmg the ‘ judgent of cotion & or of sentenc dated 29-11—2006 passed by he Chlef Judiclai Magistrate, Mahasamun i CO OF C SG UR Criminal Misc. Petition No.164 of 2008 , Maas C RESPONDENT li Ju Single Bench: Honble Mr. T.P. Shayma, J h i da 1" n 200 in m nvic der e t d n Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.7/2005, whereby learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has convicted the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘the ct’) and sentenced him to pay fine of Rs.1,00,000/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo R.I. for three months and also directed to award the compensation of Rs.1 lakh (the amount of fine) to the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the Court below has convicted & sentenced the respondent, but has not awarded the sentence of imprisonment to him and thereby committed illegality. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the judgment of the Court below. 4. It reveals that alter taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court below has awarded fine of Rs.1 lakh, the amount of cheque, to the respondent and awarded compensation to the petitioner. Imposition of sentence of 76 A warranting any interference. substance in the petition, same hereby dismissed.