IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 1st Bail Application No.934 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE 1. Pani Ram 2. Sunil .….Applicants (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party __________________________________________________________ Arising out of FIR No.53/2010, U/s 304 IPC, PS Kathgodam, Distt. Nainital __________________________________________________________ Dated: October 21, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. BS Adhikari, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicants are not named in the FIR. The case rests upon the circumstantial evidence and the chain of the circumstances to connect the applicants with the said crime is not complete. Learned Addl. GA also submitted that only the last seen evidence against the applicants is there. After considering all the facts and circumstances and without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicants deserves bail at this stage. Let each of the applicants be released on bail on each of their executing personal bonds and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Nainital. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) October 21, 2010 Rdang