1 cac-585-11 in cra-150-09 mmj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.585 OF 2011 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.152 OF 2010 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.150 of 2009 Vilas Yeshwant Patil .. Applicant Versus Bajirao Rama Kavadik & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. Shriniwas Patwardhan for the Applicant Mr. P. M.Arjunwadkar for Respondent Nos.2 & 3 CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATE : 1st DECEMBER, 2011 P.C. : 1 The above Civil Application is for restoration of the Civil Application No.152 of 2010, which has been dismissed for non prosecution on account of non removal of office objection relating to service on Respondent Nos.1A, 1C, 2 and 3. In so far as Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are concerned, Mr. P. M. Arjunwadkar appears on their behalf. However, in respect of the Respondent Nos.1A and 1C, it is the contention of the Learned Counsel for the Applicant that they are not accepting the service though repeated attempts have been made to serve them. The learned Counsel therefore applies for substituted service under Order 5 Rule 20 of 2 cac-585-11 in cra-150-09 the Civil Procedure Code. 2 For the reasons mentioned in the Civil Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). The Applicant to publish notice in the local newspaper i.e. Sakal or Lokmat having circulation in Kolhapur, indicating that the notice is made returnable on 9­1­2012. The Applicant to thereafter file affidavit annexing the said paper publication. 3 The Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. (R.M.SAVANT, J.)