THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10527 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioner is a resident of house bearing No.16-2-51, Akberbagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad. Respondent Nos.3 to 5 are her brothers. She submitted a complaint on 20.12.2006 to respondent Nos.1 and 2 alleging that respondent Nos.3 to 5 have started unauthorised construction in her neighbourhood. Her grievance is that respondent Nos.1 and 2 have not taken any steps so far and seeks a direction against them to remove the illegal and unauthorised construction. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and the learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 to 5. The petitioner is under assumption that respondent Nos.3 to 5 have started the construction in part of the premises bearing No. 16-2-51. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the wives of respondent Nos.3 to 5 are the owners of the premises and they started construction on the basis of deemed permission. The learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 submits that a notice under Section 452 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act was issued on 15.12.2006 regarding the construction and much before that, O.S.No.6382 of 2005 was filed in the Court of the 24th Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. An order of temporary injunction is said to have been granted in C.M.A.No.2391 of 2006 by the Court of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Apart from that, respondent Nos.3 to 5 contend that they submitted an application for regularisation of the construction in terms of G.O.Ms.No.901, dated 31.12.2007. Since steps were initiated by the owners concerned for regularisation of the construction in terms of G.O.Ms.No.901, dated 31.12.2007, the petitioner can put forward all her objections before respondent Nos.1 and 2. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to submit her objections to the application submitted by respondent Nos.3 to 5 or their spouses for regularisation of the construction. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 shall take the objections that may be submitted by the petitioner before passing any final orders in favour of respondent Nos.3 to 5 or their spouses. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:24.02.2011 kdl