IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7828 of 2010 TINKU MANDAL @ RAJU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 19.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail in connection with a police case registered under Section 366 A of the I.P.C. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the victim girl of her own went in the company of the petitioner since they used to love each other and the victim has got her age recorded under 164 Cr.P.C. statement as 19 years, but subsequently on her return, on the pressure of the family members, she alleged forceful taking away against the petitioner. It is also submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the victim came to her maternal aunt’s house on the occasion of Rakhi with the petitioner and thereafter her 164 Cr.P.C. and 161 Cr.P.C. statements have been recorded. In view of the fact that the victim in her 164 Cr.P.C. statement has alleged forcefully taking away by the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present. The application for grant of bail of the petitioner is rejected. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)