m INJMEimGiSe^Rl^iei^AT^S^RiJA®^^ MtC.G.NQ; /2d06t {Arising.outo^Drderdated 7,9.2006 passed irv Firet AppeSI No^ 184/2006) Applicahts ^w ^^ ^^ :1 ^^^ ^"^ '^^ VERSUS Sf Non-Applicants »% 3.. 3. StSrte oBSttiattisgarl-i thFougti ©olleGtor; Dhamtari {Chhattisgarh^ TheSub-Diyisional Officer, Mahanadi Reservoir, Water Managemejtit^yb Dn.No, I, Rudri, 'Tahsil & Distt.: Rhamtari {Chhattisgai-h} , Arjunrarn Sinha, S/Q ; ; Rameshwai^Sinha, Since deceasgi:)'thirough. L-ega 1 Representatives> •22'3.^a:(3anc|ahS)iStnl')a,iVa/i:>:^'Lat&' ^'?';^M^N'^W'SiB^^Slscl^aE'out: :^';:^?6D^ars.::':;','^''' ,'..':.' k- Darriaodar Sinha, S/Q LateA(jyn-Fam;agedabout .43:yrs. '. "• • !. : ;:.. Elevtprgsad^Siriha, , >S/o l...ate;ftrjun-rarn,agea!afc>out 37yrs,,'.,'.^,:^:/~,; ..-'. :^ DhaneShwarSinha,;S/o,!l..ate Arjiinram, aged ab6ut27yrs. (AIIFy9Vi|lage:;,Piperc:hedi,."Tahsil& Distt%Dhamtari{Ghhattisgai-h.y,: Rlailififfs: Nlahesh'Sahu, ©/o^;;:Un|<c)Qwn, ^aged^l^t%y0a^;^n'tin :, ^.R'atwari^l\;ljHe^|S|g!riiCl.2,K,},,; AKrGiugtllSuB.CtjviisjQhal'Offieef, -.KtattangiEli^Kes^rvGii^Watgr ^iyianaggirientiSti^Dna-Rudi-i,.:', ..Distt, ;®KamtaniS{G,;©.}:::,;.:,, :'^"!.}]EfraBFisSii tJKl3|ai,:?Arast3a S •^No;:1.S,%S,%Fpimi,.:i^^K ^E>isffi.®fian'ft:art:^©11t-latttSig;a:!J%S ww-', !B 1!:B :iPB '^:! iitBS 'Ui:l • li B^g; ^® IKBr t^^ KIB UBi <S) 10. .^ K.^ Dukhuram, S/o Chunnuram, aged about40 yrs. Sarpanch. RoopSingh,S/o Sakharm Aged about 50 years, Lalitram Sinha, S/o Gaj- Ratanlal Sinha, Thakur Ram, S/o Koduram, aged about 28 yrs. Derharam, S/o Sukhun Kurmi.aged about 43yrs. (No.8 to 12 R/o Village: Piperchedi, Tah.S Distt Dhamtari {C.G.} Defendants APPLICATION UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 19 READ WITIiSECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 FOR RESTORATION OF FIRST APPEAL BEARING N0, 184/2006 (STATE OF CHHAATTISGARH & ANOTHER VS. ARJUN RAM SINHAAND OTHERS) DISMISSED IN DEFAULT^YHON'BLESHRI JUSTICE DHIRENDRA NIISHRA BY ITS ORDER DT. 7,9,2006, XI-HC-78 d-°) •<11<IW<1, ®T{|W16;Rl<1Wg< .. i^-c- <^- ^o. '7'7. HT*TC1Tsli»l)^h ^ v 3ii^<i Maw (ii<aI^°i^<T) sn^T q>r R-ii* (Wsn^TMi* 1» c-- s^araTHfeT-w^T '^ •^/.-^ s/^ 'f^i 23-ll-2U( Slin Saniav ,*s Apra'w'.al A^vol ~~~J"^' —-•-.-C7-" • -—; - •'-~ - ~| J-teara. Ifte apptieant-ytate bas tUe^ 1S4('2006. wluch has been dismissec dated 7-y-2UU6 wftereby two weeks t ctetault as. pomtsd out vicle onice n removecl witlun tn'o WeeKs, there wa wrtliout retei'enee to tlie Bencfi. Leaiiied counsei lor ttte appli| on (letault as tlie Ktate Uovemment Notification dated 29'" Seotember. 2 bi'ouglit to tae notice ot ttie oltiee. tU .also not Orouafat to Uie notice ot peremptofy order was passed. Consiclenng the reasons as?j application tor restoration wtiicfi is ^ Appeal No. 1S4'2U06 is restored to rt^ °>il<lF>1<fl-1 WRft' fff5CS <R|+4K ^iaif^Tsn^r E['.nte for tlie. ^nnlicant/Stflite ttiis application tor restoration ot r.A. No. on y-lU-2UU(> as per an-ections ot tlus (Jourt (me was ajlowecl to uie appellant to remove me tilote clatecl ^4-7-2UU6 ancl tt tfte detault is not |s a ctn-ection that Uie appeal sliall be dismissed |;ant submits tltat Uie mattei' was wrongly listecl |.s exemptecl ti'omjpayment ot Court tee as per 1005. However. since tlus notification was not |s matter was listecl on cletauit ana ttus tact was tfte L'onn /-9-2UU6 ancl tor tliat reason. a |ignecl by tlie counsel lor tlie apiiUcant, tlis ^upponecl by an attiaawt, is allowecl. llie t-yst onsanal number. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.