IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. NO.947 OF 2008 PRAKASH MEHTA, SHIVANAND MEHTA AND SUKANT MEHTA VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 20.04.2009. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners are aggrieved by judgment dated 20.6.2008, passed by Additional Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court No. II, Araria in Cr appeal no. 2/19 of 2008/Tr no. 4 of 2008, by which he has dismissed petitioners’ appeal against judgment dated 6.2.2008, passed in GR case no. 1159 of 2001, by which the appellants/petitioners have been acquitted under section 325 I.P.C. and they have been found and held guilty for the offences under sections 342 and 323 I.P.C. . However, they have been released after due admonition under section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition with prayer that the conviction may not incur any disqualification. In the facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the nature of allegation, this Court feels that the prayer made by the petitioner cannot be said to be unreasonable, as such, the revision application is permitted to be withdrawn with observation that the conviction awarded by the learned trial court will not incur any disqualification in the way of the petitioner as per the provision of section 12 of the Probation of Offenders Act. Shashi. (S.P.Singh,J)