Civil Revision No.2067 of 2011(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.2067 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: March 25, 2011 Subhash Chand and others .....Petitioners v. Phool Patti and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Sushil Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) C.M.No.8223-CII of 2011 Requests for placing on record Annexure P1. The same is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of accordingly. Civil Revision No.2067 of 2011 The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of impugned order dated 8.2.2011 passed by learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karnal, vide which evidence of petitioners-plaintiffs has been closed by order. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned order passed by learned trial Court. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners- plaintiffs that though sufficient opportunities were availed by petitioners- plaintiffs to adduce evidence and affidavits of examination-in-chief of PW2 and PW5 were already tendered in evidence on behalf of the petitioners- plaintiffs and all other evidence has also been recorded, however, PW2 and PW5 remain to be cross-examined on behalf of the respondents-defendants. Civil Revision No.2067 of 2011(O&M) -2- Hence, in view of these facts, though sufficient opportunities for adducing evidence were availed by petitioners-plaintiffs and affidavits of examination-in-chief of PW2 and PW5 are already on record and they are only to be cross-examined by counsel for the opposite party, one opportunity can be granted to petitioners-plaintiffs to tender these witnesses at their own responsibility for the purpose of cross-examination by the opposite party and the other party can be compensated by way of cost. Hence, in view of these facts, the present revision petition is accepted and the impugned order is modified to the extent that trial Court is directed to grant one opportunity to petitioners-plaintiffs to produce PW2 and PW5 at their own responsibility for the purpose of cross-examination by the opposite party subject to payment of `10,000/- as cost, which shall be a condition precedent. Disposed of accordingly. 25.3.2011 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge