[•S- /L*' ^^.^i3^;> „ ^3.-"" ^sa'--" ^...-•" '^^--tx^^o[^ ,.eA..--', b ' '- ^. c-6^ l< IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnS6ARH A~T BILASPUR W. P. (S) N0. "7 <2)0^ / Petitioner Ramlochan Yadav S/o Late Shri Ransai Yadav, Aged about 19 years, Village - Rail Dabri, P.0. - Utardah Block <& Tahsil-Pali, Distt. Korba (C.6.) Versus Respondents 1:^ '*', "75- »-^ •' .""' ''"• ^FTT ' .'^ y""^ ^?.^ /^ State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Tribal Welfare, Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur-(C.<5.) 2..^ Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Chhattisgarh Government, Raipur, bistt. Raipur-(C.6.) 3. The Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Di'stt. - Korba-(C.6.) 4. Block Education Officer, WRITPETITEON UNDER ARTECLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTTON OF INDIA •XI-HC-22 '3^ •<ii<i]ci<i, »Ti1'y<is, («i<niyy 3TI^T •q?ra? ^..U':f....L&.l.^:.^^|^ ^) *<1*<WI thKraa 3n^rq>r h-u'h sn^i ?ti^ich ^^ sn^f'^sTw^riN Itl 13-12-2010: Shrti Arul Singh Raiput, coutisel Snit. Smita Ghai, P.L. for fhe| Grievao.ee of fhe petitioner iji his father was an ei&ployee of T^ time of his death i.e. on 8.8.99 Govemiaent Boys Hostel, Boida,| Accoridng to the petitioner, at the was minor and uainediateiy after he filed appHcation for compassio^ate no order has been passed by th|f N0.2. Counsel for the petitioner si facts, this Coiirt has passed tiie the coinpetent aufhority to petitioner aud pass appropriate on? Couusel for fhe petitioner inay be permitted to wifhdraw thi^ ruay be issued to the resp. No.' icpresentation of fhe petitioner ir( pass appropriate order. State counsel subinits that representation to the conceruedj objection if any direction is bep representation ia accoidauce with consiitter cfril^[ci4l'l 'RFRTf ^ 'f^^t' <^l'(^.l-t. ^aiPaiian^ State. le present petitioa is fhat Hbal Departm.ent and at fhe Ihe was working as Peon at Block Pati, District Korba. fcme of deafh of bis fatfaer, he ^.ttauung fhe age of m.ajority, ^ate appointoient but tiU date coinpete.nt authorit\r/ resp. llbmits fh.at ia ahnost sim-iiar brder dated 31.1.09 dn-ectuij the representation. of the Iter. lubinits fhat at this stage, he petition. However, direction t/resp. No.3 to cousider the accordaace with law aiid to fct the petitioner niake a fresh aufhority and she has n.o ig issued for deciding his law. [^ ^SV .^.^ r«its -HC-22 'Svt -^wWi, w»\ww,hwwy. 11MMT 9>W«h 'fa^ST" SD^T^ K.'iM 311^1 ?b^ich ^i^T sii^TWiwgfsn Accordiagly, the petitioner petition with liberty to make a aufhority concemed wifhia a peijiod of three weeks' froia fhe date o.f receipt of copy of fhis o^er aad ia tum it is expected froin the authorities concemed io decide the saine wifhin a furfcher period of four sionttis fi^ni ttie date of its receipt, ia accordan.ee wifh law. It is laade clear that this pourt has not expressed aay opiaion on inerits of the case <^l^I<vl4l'i tnr^if -^ -f^t ^^•i-ZR '^siPg'qan^r ^ pennitted to withdraw fhis fresh represeutation to the bid ttie aufhority concemed wpuld be at Mberty to decide the r^presentation of fhe petitioner strictly in accordaace wifh law. Sdf- Pritinker Diwakar Judge [^ -^s^