1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1938 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4986 OF 2009 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. ..Appellant. Vs. Sheela Balu Baudha Baisane & ors. ..Respondents. Mr.S.S.Vidyarthi for the Appellant. Mr.R.B.Chavanke i/by S.R.Chavanke for the Respondents 1 to 4. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 11th February, 2010 PC : 1 Heard both sides. 2 Advocate for the appellant states that multiplier has wrongly been taken as 17 when according to the judgment of the Apex Court nultiplier should be 16. Advocate for the respondent has filed cross objection taking objection to the calculation of the deduction towards the personal expenses since according to the same judgment deduction should be 1/4th. Parties 2 are agree that if Sarla Verma s case is applied in its totality, then amount of the compensation will be higher. In the circumstances, there is no substance in the first appeal and the first appeal is dismissed. Advocate for the respondent states that since first appeal is dismissed, he is not pressing the cross objection and he may be allowed to withdraw the cross objection. Cross objection is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed. There will be refund of court fee as per rules. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4986 of 2009 1 As the main appeal is dismissed on merits, this civil application does not survive and the same is also dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)