THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition Nos.5718 & 5727 of 2008 (Dated : 11-02-2010) C.R.P.No.5718 & 5727 of 2008:- Mr.Mareddy Venkata Reddy S/o Suryanarayana Reddy And others …Petitioners A n d Smt.Palikala Kusumamba W/o late Krishna Reddy and Others …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition Nos.5718 & 5727 of 2008 COMMON ORDER: These two Civil Revision Petitions are directed against the orders dated 17.10.2008 and 08.12.2008 passed in I.A.No.865 of 2008 and I.A.No.983 of 2008 in I.A.No.828 of 2008 respectively in O.S.No.1312 of 2008 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. 2. Background facts in nutshell leading to filing of these revisions are:- Petitioners herein are defendants 1, 3 and 4. Respondents 1 to 5 are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.1312 of 2008. They filed O.S.No.1312 of 2008 against the petitioners and respondents 6 to 27 seeking the following relief:- a) By granting perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents and whoever acts on their behalf from ever interfering with the Plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Plaint Schedule property in any manner or whatsoever; b) For costs of the suit; and c) For such other relief or reliefs as the Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case”. They also moved I.A.No.865 of 2008 seeking for temporary injunction. An ad interim injunction came to be granted on 29th September 2008. The petitioners herein entered appearance and filed I.A.No.983 of 2008 to vacate the injunction granted against them. 3. The learned Judge has been adjourning the injunction application as well as the vacate stay petition on the ground that the notices have not been served on some of the respondents. 4. The petitioners filed C.R.P.No.5727 of 2008 assailing the action of the learned III Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam in keeping I.A.No.983 of 2008 in I.A.No.828 of 2008 in O.S.No.1312 of 2008 pending and whereas C.R.P.No.5718 of 2008 is filed assailing the order passed in I.A.No.865 of 2008 granting police aid to the plaintiffs. 5. Since these two C.R.Ps arise out of the interlocutory orders passed in one and the same suit, i.e., O.S.No.1312 of 2008, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 6. Heard Sri S.R.Ashok, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri V.S.R.Anjaneyulu, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 5. 7. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners narrated the history of the case in respect of the suit schedule land right from the year 1982. However, in view of the order proposed to be passed, the entire history of the case need not be elucidated. Learned Senior Counsel submits that since the vacate stay petition filed by the petitioners is pending, it would suffice if a direction is given to the trial Court to dispose of the vacate stay petition. 8. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents also agreed for the disposal of revisions with such direction. 9. In that view of the matter, both the Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of directing the trial Court to consider the vacate stay petition, i.e., I.A.No.983 of 2008 and pass appropriate orders within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Both parties shall maintain status quo with regard to possession of the property. The police protection granted in favour of the plaintiffs in I.A.No.983 of 2008 shall remain in suspension till disposal of the vacate stay petition. _____________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J Dt.11-02-2010 RAR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition Nos.5718 & 5727 of 2008 DATED : 11-02-2010