IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2011 / 21ST CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 11735 of 2011(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- B.M.AJITHKUMAR, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.HRISHIKESAN EMBRANTHIRI, BANTHALOT MANA, KONATHU KUNNU P.O., IRINGALAKUDA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.N.ANILKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASOM, DEVASOM BUILDINGS, NAITHANCODE, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE ASSISTANT DEVASOM COMMISSIONER, PARAVOOR GROUP, PARAVOOR. ADV. SRI. P. GOPAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 11735 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 11th day of April, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Santi in the Andipallykavu temple. He has been transferred to Puthoorpally, 45 kms. away from his residence. The petitioner has been repeatedly requesting for a more convenient station. The petitioner has filed Ext. P4 reasons for transfer during general transfer this year. Ha has followed it up with Ext. P5 before the Devaswom Commissioner. The petitioner seeks disposal of Exts.P4 and P5. 2. Standing counsel for the Devawom Board submits that there is no prayer for disposal of Ext. P4, which is filed before the 2nd respondent. It is further submitted that Ext. P5 is filed before the 1st respondent, who is the appellate authority in the event of the petitioner not succeeding before the 2nd respondent. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P4 along with the case of other similarly situated employees during general transfer this year. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.