IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18499 of 2010 ANARJEET KUMAR YADAV @ BHANU KUMAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 07.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. There is every allegation about torture for demand of dowry but according to the learned counsel that ended when petitioner instigated informant and her family members to accompany this petitioner. They agreed. Informant came to Hyderabad with this petitioner. Thereafter, direction of the torture is turned not by any overt act rather making allegation about petitioner’s having relation with a Muslim lady even married with her after changing the name which is denied. Moreover, the nature of latest torture is not justifying refusal of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 2018 of 2008/Sonpur P.S. Case No. 192 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2 C.J.M., Saran, Chapra subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Office is directed to return the Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the learned counsel for the Opposite Party No. 2. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)