IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23276 of 2010 RANJIT SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the I.P.C. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. The impugned order suggests that the complainant refused to go to her in- laws house due to apprehension to her life. In that view of the matter, let the petitioner, Ranjit Sharma, be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 2807 of 2006 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Purnea, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. 2 It is made clear that as and when the complainant will file an application before the learned S.D.J.M., Purnea, expressing her willingness to resume the conjugal life then the learned court below will issue notice to the petitioner when the petitioner will appear and take the complainant to her matrimonial home and keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. If the petitioner fails to perform his duty as husband then the complainant will be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)