1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION IInd Bail Application No. 56 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Shakir S/o Sabir R/o Nai Basti, Near Gopal Mandir, Haldwni,District Nainital …………Applicant ( In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ……Opposite party Dated :June 8, 2010 _________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 12 of 2010 U/Ss 302,394,201,411 and 120 B of IPC, P.S. Haldwai, District Nainital _________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer,J. This is second bail application moved on behalf of the applicant. First bail was dismissed as withdrawn on 15.4.2010 and that was not dismissed on merits. Heard Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the applicant as well as Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. Government Advocate for the State and also perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is not named in FIR. He further argued that the case rests upon the circumstantial evidence and chain of circumstances is not complete to connect the applicant with the alleged crime. Further, no credible evidence has been collected by the I.O against the applicant till today. The only evidence against the applicant –accused is that he had given a mobile number to the deceased. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. 2 Let the applicant Shair be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of CJM Nainital. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer,J.) 08.06.2010