IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11191 of 2009 Damodar Prasad, son of Late Rameshwar Mahto, resident of Village-Dhobi Bigha, P.S.-Ashthawan, District-Nalanda, Presently a retired Plant Protecti8on Supervisor, Aurangabad From the office of Junior Plant Protection Officer, Aurangabad. ……………..Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Agriculture Production Commissioner. Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 3. The Director of Agriculture, Bihar New Secretariat,Patna. 4. The Joint Director of Agriculture (Plant Protection) Mithapur, Farm, Patna. 5. The Deputy Directors of Agriculture (Plant Protection) Bhagalour Division, Bhagalpur. 6. The Junior Plant Protection Officer, Munger. 7. The Junior Plant Protection Officer, Motihari. 8. The Junior Plant Protection Officer, Aurangabad. 9. The District Provident Fund Officer, Aurangabad. ……Respondents. ----------- 2. 01. 09. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has not been received the entire dues on Provident Fund. Since dues for the period 1965-66 to 1987 to 1987-88 which was deducted from the salary of the petitioner, but he has not received the same for the aforesaid period. It is further submitted that petitioner had file a representation as well as giving a legal notice. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case petitioner files a details representation stating details of posting during the material time, the same would be verified. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his 2 grievance, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before Respondent No. 4. In case, such representation is filed along with relevant documents in support of his claim as also certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today, Respondent No. 4 shall consider and dispose of the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievance of the petitioner could be redressed without delay. With the above observations/directions, this writ application stands disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)