CRM No. M 6942 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 6942 of 2010 Date of decision: 01.02.2011 Sukhdev Kaur ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Munish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab Ms Monica Goyal, Advocate for respondents No. 4 to 7 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of appropriate directions to respondents No. 1 to 3 to properly investigate FIR No. 4 dated 08.01.2010 registered at Police Station Bilga District Jalandhar under Section 447, 379, 506, 148, 149 IPC and to arrest respondents No. 4 to 7. Reply by way of affidavit of Jasbir Singh, PPS, DSP, Phillaur, District Jalandhar has been filed. As per the reply, Bahadur Singh son of Bhajan Singh-respondent No. 4 moved an application for reinvestigation of CRM No. M 6942 of 2010 2 the aforesaid case with DSP, Phillaur vide No. 177-R/DSP/PHR dated 26.02.2010 and the matter was thoroughly investigated by the then DSP, Phillaur and found that the house in dispute was purchased by respondent No. 4 namely Bahadur Singh son of Bhajan Singh resident of Village Rawan, Tehsil Phillaur, District Jalandhar from one Smt. Gurdev Kaur wife of Sarwan Singh resident of Village Rawan for a sum of Rs.1,30,000/- about eight years back and electricity meter is installed in the name of his father and the same is in possession of respondent No. 4 and the petitioner has no other documents except one suspicious Will which may show her ownership over the house in dispute and the petitioner has lodged false case bearing No. 04 dated 08.021.2010 under sections 447, 379, 506, 148, 149 IPC at the instance of some anti social elements, during the investigations, it came to light that respondent No. 4 namely Bahadur Singh is residing in the house in dispute for the last 8-9 years and the said house is in possession of Bahadur Singh and accordingly, the said DSP found that the incident as mentioned in the FIR has never taken place. Respondent No. 3 has submitted the cancellation report for approval. On instructions from ASI Sarabjit Singh, it is pointed out by learned State counsel that the said cancellation report is pending before the SSP (Rural) Jalandhar, for approval. Learned counsel for the petitioner disputes the aforesaid finding of the DSP, Phillaur. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the petitioner to appear before the SSP (Rural), Jalandhar before whom the cancellation report is pending. The SSP (Rural), Jalandhar shall CRM No. M 6942 of 2010 3 give personal hearing to the petitioner and take a final decision only thereafter, in accordance with law. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 01.02.2011 mohan