IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 27634 of 2008 Between: 1 M. Sai Prabhu S/o. Late Mallaiah Both are Ex. Section Writers in the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, now re-designated as Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. 2 Md. Ali Ghori S/o. Md. Nabi Ghori Both are Ex. Section Writers in the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, now re-designated as Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Government of A.P. Rep. by its Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Rep. by its Commissioner, MCH Building, Hyderabad. 3 The Labour Court No.I, Chandravihar Buildings, M.J. Market Road, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the Records relating to the orders passed in ID No. 189/2004 and 190/2004 dt. 24th June, 2008 which was published vide G.O.Rt.No. 1596 dt. 22-7-2008 on the file of the 3rd Respondent Court and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and further direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioners into service forthwith with all attendant benefits from the date of termination and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA W. P. NO. 27634 of 2008 ORDER: 1 When the matter is taken for hearing, both the counsel represented that this matter is squarely covered by the order of a learned single Judge of this court in W.P.No.15650 of 2003 dated 15.04.2008 as confirmed by a division bench of this court in W.A.No.1118 of 2008 and batch dated 16.09.2008. 2 In the light of the said consensus arrived at between the parties, this court is of the view that the impugned order in this Writ Petition is hereby set aside and the respondent authorities are hereby directed to reinstate the petitioners and if thereafter, the services of the petitioners-workmen are not required, it will be open to the respondent authority to terminate their services in accordance with law. 3 Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. ------------------------- SRI T.G.K, J. 05.08.2009 Kvsn