Court No.2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No.2468 of 2001 Devendra Singh ……… Petitioner Versus Deputy Director of Consolidation/, Additional Collector Haridwar and others. …….. Respondents ……………………… Sri A.K.Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri H.M.Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Date: July 31,2008. Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. This writ petition is directed against the orders dated 30.05.2001, 28.10.1995 and 18.03.2005 passed by respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3 respectively. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Settlement Officer of Consolidation has changed the Gata number which has been allotted to him by the Consolidation Officer and increased the value of the land from fifty paise to sixty paise while the petitioner was claiming value of the land forty paise. The appeal filed by the petitioner has also been dismissed by the appellate court against which the petitioner has preferred revision which has also been dismissed by the impugned order dated 30.05.2001. The revisional court has recorded the finding that the Settlement Officer (Consolidation) made spot inspection and determined the value of the land. There is no loss to the petitioner from the present chak. 2 The revisional court has passed the impugned order on merit. The finding is based on the revenue records. Hence the matter is concluded by the finding of fact. I do not find any illegality in the orders passed by the appellate court as well as the revisional court. No interference is called for in the impugned orders. 3. The writ petition has no force and is dismissed. No order as to costs. (P.C.Verma,J.) 31.07.2008 P.Singh