CRM No.M-29236 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:-14.10.2010 Suresh Kumar son of Bhura Ram ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr.Bipan Ghai, Senior Advocate with Mr.Vinod Ghai, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Vikas Malik, A.A.G. Haryana. M ehinder S ingh S ullar , J . (Oral) Having exercised his right of regular bail and lost in the Court of Addl.Sessions Judge, petitioner Suresh Kumar son of Bhura Ram, has filed the present petition for regular bail in a case registered against him alongwith his other co-accused, vide FIR No.163 dated 20.8.2010, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B and section 61/1/14 of the Punjab Excise Act, by the police of Police Station Chandi Mandir, Distt.Panchkula, invoking the provisions of section 439 Cr.PC. 2. Notice of the petition was issued to the State. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, having gone through the record with their valuable help and after bestowal of thoughts over the entire matter, to my mind, the present petition deserves to be accepted in this respect. 4. What is not disputed here is that all the offences alleged against the petitioner are triable by the Court of Magistrate. As even the challan has not been presented in the Court, therefore, the conclusion of trial would naturally take a long time. The petitioner was arrested on 20.8.2010 and since then he is in judicial CRM No.M-29236 of 2010 2 custody. There is no history of previous involvement of the petitioner in any such case. Moreover, no useful purpose will be served to further detain the petitioner in jail. 5. So, taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances, emanating from the record, as discussed here-in-above, to me, the present petitioner is entitled to regular in the obtaining circumstances of the case. 6. In the light of the aforesaid reasons and without commenting further anything on merits, lest it may prejudice the case of either side during the course of the trial of the case, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate or in his absence, the Duty Magistrate, Panchkula. 7. The instant petition is disposed of accordingly. 14.10.2010 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) AS Judge