IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13576 of 2010 RAM MILAN PRASAD S/O LATE BACCHA PRASAD R/O VILLAGE MOZAHIDPUR(DHANAUTI) P.S. MUFFASIL SIWAN, DISTRICT- SIWAN…………………………PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………….....OPP.PARTY. ----------- 3 30-06-2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. The petitioner being husband of the victim is languishing in jail since 24.11.2009 in a case registered under section 302/34 I.P.C.. It is alleged that the petitioner has illicit relation with one Kuraisha Khatoon and that was the reason of fighting with the victim. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there are two minor children of the petitioner and there is none in the family to look after. It is also submitted that there is no direct evidence against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the state, however, submits that due to illicit relationship the petitioner has caused death to the victim. Considering the fact that the petitioner being the husband has duty to protect his wife, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present. The bail petition of the petitioner is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after six months. S.P. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh,J. )