S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9412 of 2006. Mst. Shanti daughter of Madari VERSUS State of Rajasthan & Others Date of Order ::: 17/07/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.S. Asopa Mr. Tarun Jain, Counsel for the Petitioner Dr. A.S. Khangarot, Addl.G.A., for the Respondents. **** Heard learned counsel for the parties. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 29.08.2005 of the Revenue Appellate Authority as well as order dated 07.08.2006 of the Board of Revenue for Rajasthan, Ajmer, whereby the order of the Revenue Appellate Authority has been upheld. Prior to the order of the Revenue Appellate Authority the appeal was filed against the orders of the Collector Sawai Madhopur dated 04.04.2001 and the Tehsildar dated 01.01.1997, whereby it has been held that the petitioner has encroached upon the Government land, therefore, a civil imprisonment of two months was imposed under Section 90-A of the Land Revenue Act and Section 212 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act. The said order was modified by the Revenue Appellate Authority to the extent that in case the petitioner vacates the premises then the order of civil imprisonment will not came into force, which was ultimately upheld by the Revenue Appellate Authority. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order so far it relates to civil imprisonment is not legal and proper. I have considered the aforesaid aspect of the matter and is of the view that the impugned orders passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority as well as Board of Revenue are just, legal and proper, therefore, no interference is called for in the matter. In case the petitioner has not vacated the place of encroachment, then the respondent-State is directed to implement the orders the Revenue Appellate Authority as well as Board of Revenue and send a report to this Court within a period of three weeks. The writ petition is disposed of with the above observations. (P.S. Asopa) J. ashok/