IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29648 of 2008 Sushil Dhari, son of Majhi Dhari, resident of village-Onda, P.S. Sare, District- Nalanda ……… Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ……… Opp.Party ----------- 2. 30/09/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that the petitioner was earlier granted bail by the court below in the case. However, as the petitioner was remanded in another case, no body took steps in this case on his behalf and therefore his bail bond was cancelled and warrants were issued. Thereafter, petitioner has been remanded in this case on 16th January, 2008. Since the petitioner personally could not take steps in the case due to his remand in another case, it appears that the petitioner was not at fault in not taking steps in the case. Hence, this application is allowed. Let petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J., F.T.C.-III, - 2 - Sheikhpura in S.T.No.759A of 2003, arising out of Barbigha P.S.Case No.238 of 2001, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall appear in the case on each and every date except for sufficient reasons to the satisfaction of the court below, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bond and take him into custody. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh,J.)