IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR SECOND APPEAL No.317 OF 1999 & SAMP.No.2801 of 2010 BETWEEN Anthappa (died) and others. …APPELLANTS AND Ramchandrappa and others. …RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioners: MR. B. VIJAYSEN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR. N. VASUDEVA REDDY The Court made the following: - COMMON JUDGMENT: The appeal is finally settled. Memorandum of compromise is filed vide SAMP.No.2801 of 2010. Parties are present and they confirm the terms of compromise. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants states that appellants 3 and 4 are not pressing the second appeal and to the extent of other appellants, they have entered into a compromise with respondent No.10. Respondents 3 and 4 are official respondents whereas respondents 5 to 9 are styled as formal parties to the compromise. 3. Respondent No.10 is present in the Court and his counsel also confirms the memorandum of compromise together with the plan indicating the different portions of the suit schedule property being shared by the appellants, except appellants 3 and 4, and the respondent No.10. I am, therefore, satisfied that the compromise being lawful deserves to be recorded. 4. SAMP.No.2801 of 2010 is accordingly ordered. Accordingly, the second appeal stands disposed of in terms of compromise. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J November 26, 2010 DSK