IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10780 of 2010 1. SURESH PANDEY 2. SALONA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 26-04-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the complainant. Petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law respectively of the complainant in a case under Section 498A and other Sections of the IPC and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It has been submitted that it is the responsibility of husband of the complainant to maintain her and keep her properly. It has further been submitted that that there is no medical evidence to support the allegations of forced abortion as claimed by the complainant. Considering all the facts and circumstances, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks, let the above named petitioners be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs.7,000/ each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM, Bhabhua Kaimur in connection with Complaint Case No. 101/2008 and T.R. 1425/2009 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh,J.)