IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-28888 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.9.2011 Naranjan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present: Mr.K.B.Raheja, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioner makes a grievance of a mutation having been wrongly entered on a date which was not to his satisfaction. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that it is manifest from the facts of the case that a criminal offence has been committed and, therefore, the police should be directed to register a case. On due appreciation of the matter, I am of the opinion that no directions can be issued in this case. The factum of the mutation having been entered on a previous date ipso facto cannot invite an allegation of criminality. It is possible that there may be other reasons such as inadvertence which may be the cause of such an exercise. There is thus no ground to grant the prayer of the petitioner. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the instant petition. Permitted to do so. Crl.Misc.No.M-28888 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Dismissed as withdrawn. 21.9.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss