IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-5576 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 07.10.2010 Chand Ram Antil ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Vijay Kumar Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Malik, A.A.G. Haryana Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel intends to withdraw the instant petition to enable the petitioner to raise all the points involved in this petition at appropriate stage before the trial Court. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 3. Needless to say that the trial Court would consider the compounding of the offence in view of Government instructions (Annexure P-1). (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge October 07, 2010 naresh.k