IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 23RD FEBRUARY 2010 / 4TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 37113 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.A. GOPI, S/O. APPU, AGED 66, THANDAGATTIL HOUSE, P.O. KALOOR, VADAKKEKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 679 562. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMACHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, DPI OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, P.O. AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR. (4th RESPONDENT IS DELETED FROM THE PARTY ARRAY AS PER ORDER IN I.A.NO.2648/2010) 5. SRI.V.N. BHASKARAN, HEADMASTER, THRIVALAYANNOOR HIGH SCHOOL, KALLOOR.P.O, 679 562, VADAKKEKADA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED FOR R5 SRI.K.E.HAMZA FOR R GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.SANDESH RAJA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 37113/2009 ================== Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has received information to the effect that, subsequently the DPI has passed an order placing the 5th respondent under suspension. This is not disputed by the counsel for the 5th respondent. In the above circumstances, it is not necessary to consider the writ petition on merits, since the petitioner's grievance is non-implementation of Ext.P7 order for suspension of the 5th respondent. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge