WPMS No. 1823/2001 (Old No. 3065/99) Hon’ble B. C. Kandpal, J. By way of this writ petition the petitioners have sought the relief in the nature of certiorari calling for the records of the case and to quash the orders dated 11.1.1999 and 10.5.1999 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Haldwani, Nainital and District & Sessions Judge, Nainital, as contained in Annexures-6 and 3 respectively. Briefly stated the facts are that respondent no. 6-Bishan Datt moved an application before Sub Divisional Magistrate, Haldwani, Nainital for realse of the land attached. The learned Magistrate vide order dated 11.1.1999 released the land in favour of respondents no. 5 to 8 but did not release the petitioners’ land. Against this, the petitioners preferred revision before District & Sessions Judge, Nainital and the same was also dismissed. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid impugned orders, the petitioners have filed the petition before this Court. Heard Sri P.C. Maulekhi, learned counsel for petitioners, Sri Sarvesh Agrawal, learned counsel for respondents no. 5 to 8 and perused the record. Having considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties as well as after perusing the impugned orders, I am of the view that impugned orders passed by courts below do not suffer from any infirmity and the same do not require any interference by this Court. The petition lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in limime. Stay order, if any, stands vacated. (B. C. K., J.) 08.05.2008 SP