IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5817 of 2008 ----- PADUM YADAV & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 18.7.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioner no.1 has been arrested during the pendency of this application and as such this application on behalf of petitioner no.1 has become infructuous. Accordingly, this application on behalf of petitioner no.1 Padum Yadav is dismissed as having become infructuous. The petitioner no.2 Arjun Yadav apprehends his arrest in connection with Paraiya P.S. Case No.69/07 for the alleged offences registered under sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of the Arms Act and 3(x) S.C./S.T. Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner no.2 that on perusal of the F.I.R. it would appear that the allegation against petitioner no.2 Arjun Yadav is general and 2 omnibus and there is also no specific allegation of alleged offence under the provisions of the S.C/S.T. Act. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, and on perusal of the allegations made in the F.I.R. and the other materials brought on the record, it is directed that petitioner no.2 Arjun Yadav, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Paraiya P.S. Case No.69/07 (G.R. No.2074 of 2007) within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)