IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3157 of 2011. Date of Decision : May 10, 2011 Ajay Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another … Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. N. K. Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is a PTA teacher. He is aggrieved since he has been replaced by a regular teacher, namely, Ms. Shilpa Aggarwal. She is not a party to the writ petition. According to the petitioner, there are several vacancies, where Ms. Shilpa Aggarwal can be accommodated; whereas the petitioner can be accommodated only in the school, where he is appointed as a PTA teacher. If Ms. Shilpa Aggarwal, who is a regular teacher, can be accommodated in any of such vacancies, which is convenient to her, the petitioner may approach the second respondent with the consent letter of said Ms. Shilpa Aggarwal. The petitioner may convince the teacher that he can work only in that school, whereas she can work in any other 2 school. In the event of petitioner approaching the second respondent, as above, as per the willingness given by Ms. Shilpa Aggarwal, immediate action shall be taken and the petitioner shall be accommodated in that vacancy. 2. Yet another prayer made by the petitioner is that there are several vacancies of Lecturer (Chemistry) in the State and he is prepared to work in any of the vacancies. It is a policy matter and for that, the petitioner may also approach the Government. 3. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 10, 2011 (PK/Pankaj)