IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. i? é'é 20 01 :_QV,-»’1(/Iahesh Kumar Ratre, Aged 33 years, S/o Shri Udhoram,,Ratre, R/o Village Khapri, Vikash Khand - Dhandha, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh, Through — Secretary Panchayat & Gramin Vikas, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G>.) 2. Commissioner Raipur Division, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Collector Durg,’ Durg (C.Gt) 4. Gram Panchayat Khapri, Vikas Khand Dhamdha, Distt. Durg (C.G.)“ x WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ORDERS IN NA- TURE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS. 1. Particulars of the Petitioner The petitioner was/is one of the Panchayat Karmi Worker of Panchayat) at Village Khapri. The pe- titioner was removed illegally from his post by 'Sarpanch ( 3a W, W713, W Wé’mm Sbn' Kishore Bhaduri, Icarned counsel for the petitionar. Shri Ranbjr Singh, Govt. Adv. for the Stata. Heani. Admittedly, the petitione: who was worldng as Panchayat Karmi was removed from his post on the basis of certain complaints. The petitioner unssuccessfnny' challenged the order before the Collector, Durg. Hovvever, the said order of the Collector was set aside by the Commissioner and the matter was - remanded with a direction to complete the proceedings Within a month and during the pendenc of the proceedings the petitioner was directed to remain under s spension. Being aggrieved by the order dated 28-5—2001, the peu‘ 'oner has approached this Court. It is contended that sincd the order was set aside and the matter was remanded for a hes enquiry the Comnnssmner was not Jushiied m directing th t the applicant shall remam suspended. Further grievance s to the delay in disposal of the l proceedings after remand. " As al'dmittedly, proceedings have been I initiated, in View of the directioxil given by the Commissioner, the .I. “amnsn in”. n- Wm gimg W 2% ‘ m gamma i WWW 13 Wm $ W eaTé'ST 02-08-2002 WVP- [Q66 mam w‘h m 290! mmmw § a,’ mg Wiwfwyfrm ‘Zkaf1atlm ght to have been disposed of as a reasonable period. Therefore, the case and in View of the facts the petition is disposed of by complete the proceedings Within the date of communication / goes Without saying that the ts own merits in accordance with ‘f( hearing {I ¥ Court feels that’pmceSdings ou directed or at any rate Within Without going into the merits of and circumstances of the case dimcting the respondent No.3 to a period of two months from production of this order. It proceedings shall be decided on 3 O the law after giving due opportuhityzto the petitioner. If the petitioner does not cooperate oii‘ takes adjournment that peliod shall be added to the pen'od of'xw’ok months. '1 In View of the above o‘ disposed of. J ’ V'Ko Certified copy as per rules. aservation, the petition stands _..._..- MJ Sd/— i f P.C.Naik Judge