AJN 00-cmOS-WP2329.09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2329 OF 2009 ALONG WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.116 OF 2011 Awadhesh Vashishtha Tiwari & Ors. ... Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents None for the petitioners. Mr. Milind More, A.G.P. for the State. Mr. M.U. Pandey for respondent 6. CORAM: MRS. RANJANA DESAI & R.G. KETKAR, JJ. DATED : 9TH JUNE, 2011. P.C.:- 1. This petition is moved before us on a praecipe filed by respondent 6. Learned A.G.P. is present. Learned counsel for respondent 6 states that he has served the petitioners as well as other respondents. He has tendered in the court copy of the acknowledgment to substantiate AJN 00-cmOS-WP2329.09 2 this submission. It is taken on record and marked “X”. We direct respondent 6 to file affidavit of service. Affidavit of service be field within one week from today. 2. Learned counsel pointed out that in paragraph 13 of our order dated 4/5/2011, there is an inadvertent error, which reads thus: “It is important to note that the petitioners had moved the Bench of this court which has decided Writ Petition No.2746 of 2005 on 26/4/2006 by way of a praecipe for speaking to the minutes, however, the Bench declined to modify the order.” This sentence should read as : “The petitioners moved this court by way of praecipe dated 24/2/2006 and decided to tender written submissions and compilation of documents. The said request was rejected.” 3. The above sentence should replace the earlier sentence. Order is corrected accordingly. [MRS. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [R.G. KETKAR, J.]