IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 22019 of 1999 Between: Pratty Jyoshna D/o.Abhiram 10-38-22/3/3, Ramnagar, Visakhapatnam-13 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Convenor, EAMCET - 1999 JNTU, Hyderabad 2 The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad 3 NTR University of Health Sciences rep.by its Registrar, Vijayawada .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ, particularly one in the nature of writ of “Mandamus” (1) declaring the action of the respondents in not awarding the marks in respect of Question No.51 and 58 is illegal, arbitrary; (2) in not awarding marks to Choice No.(2) of Question No.84 Choice No.1 to question No.28 and Choice No.4 to question No.154 is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents herein to revalue the answer sheet of the petitioner herein and award marks as sought by the petitioner, issue revised rank card and admit the petitioner into the 1st year MBBS Course in any of the college for the Academic year 1999-2000. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.L.KIRAN PRAKASH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Dr.Y.PADMAVATHI The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO.22019 OF 1999 ORDER: The petitioner herein appeared for Engineering, Agricultural and Medical Common Entrance Test (EAMCET) –1999 and she obtained a rank of 1563. After publication of the key answers, she alleged that the answer to question Nos.28, 51, 58, 84 and 154 are wrong. In the meanwhile, this Court by judgment dt.19.8.1999 in Writ Petition No.11743 of 1999 and batch directed the respondents to revalue the answers keeping in view findings in the said judgment. Alleging that same benefit is not given, petitioner filed the Writ petition. This Court while ordering rule nisi on 21.10.1999 passed interim orders in W.P.M.P.No.27582 of 1999 directing that the revaluation benefit as ordered by this Court in Writ Petition No.11743 of 1999 and batch, dt.19.8.1999 shall be extended to the petitioner herein. In that view of the matter, no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 25.8.2004 bnr To 1 The Convenor, EAMCET - 1999 JNTU, Hyderabad 2 The Secretary to Government of Andhra Pradesh, Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad 3 The Registrar, NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada 4 2 CCs to G.P. for Higher Education, High Court Bldgs., Hyderabad.(OUT) 5 2 CD copies.