mss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 384 OF 2009 MANIKRAO MADHUKAR GAIKHE & ANR. .. PETITIONERS Vs. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCITIES NIPHAD & ORS... RESPONDENTS Mr. Kishor Patil for the petitioners Mrs. M. P. Thakur, AGP CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATED: 24/8/2009 P.C. Admittedly the revision application filed by the petitioner is pending with the 6th respondent i.e. the State of Maharashtra. Copy of the revision application along with the stay application is annexed to the petition at Exhibit-C. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the 6th respondent may be given direction to dispose of the said revision application in accordance with law in a time frame. Hence the following order: The 6th respondent is directed to hear and dispose of the revision application and the stay application filed by the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of three months from today. We make it clear that, we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the revision and stay application may be disposed of in accordance with law independently and on merits. Since there was no stay order passed by this court, there is no question of vacating the same. Petition is disposed of. (Smt. Ranjana Desai, J.) (A. A. Sayed, J.)