IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 4733 of 2008 Decided on: 22.09.2010 Surjit Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner. : Mr. K.S. Banyal, Advocate, For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 4. None for respondent No. 5. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : It is jointly represented by learned counsel for the parties that the matter was referred to the Divisional Commissioner, Kangra at Dharamshala. Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General submits on the basis of the instructions imparted to him that the Divisional Commissioner, Kangra at Dharmashala has already decided the matter in one of the similar situate cases. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Divisional Commissioner, Kangra 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? no -2- at Dharamshala to decide the case of the petitioner, if not already decided, within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 22, 2010 (K. Attri)