IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 446 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 08/01/2003 in WP No: 5774 OF 2000 on the file of the High Court.) BETWEEN: The Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd., Vidyut Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, rep., by its Chief Engineer (DISCOMS) ... APPELLANT AND Sri B.R. Dhanujacharyulu, S/o Sri B.R. Chari, Revenue Collector, C/o A.O.Sr.E.P.O., (Transco), Sirpurkagaznagar, Adilabad District. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: P.R.BALARAMI REDDY(SC FOR AP TRANSCO) Counsel for the Respondent: MR.K.V.N.BHUPAL The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) On the earlier occasion, as nobody appeared for the appellant, we have heard the learned counsel for the respondent and adjourned the matter so as to enable the learned counsel for the appellant to argue the matter and directed the matter to be listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Today also when the matter is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J June 9, 2009 DSK