IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 4TH OCTOBER 2011 / 12TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26465 of 2011(G) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ MUHAMMED SAJID, S/O.E.M.SAHDA, AGED 23 YEARS, HIRA XXX/344, UNITY ROAD, CHAMGAMPUZHA NAGAR, KALAMASSERY-682 033. BY ADVS. SMT.P.USHAKUMARI SRI.INNOCENT FRANCIS PAPALI RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, P.O.ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR-686 560. 2. REGISTRAR (EXAMINATION), MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, P.O.ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686 560. 3. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, P.O.ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686 560. 4. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, DEPARTMENT COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, SECRETRIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. R1-R3 BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SCL. WP(C).No. 26465 of 2011(K) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF THE EXAMINATION – DIGITAL COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE REG. NO. 746030 DATD 12/8/2011 ISSUED BY MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY. P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FORM DATED 3/9/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR REVALUATING THE ANSWER SCRIPT OF DIGITAL COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUES. P3: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT SHOWING THE PAYMENT OF THE REQUIRED FEE OF RS.500/- FOR REVALUATION. P4: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 26/9/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE SCL. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ----------------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 26465 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of October, 2011. JUDGMENT The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the respondents to publish the revaluation result of the one paper - 'Digital Communication Techniques' of 6th Semester B.Tech course of the petitioner, as requested by him vide Ext. P2. 2. Heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents as well, who submits that, a minimum time of ten weeks is necessary to have the revaluation result published in respect of the papers concerned. In the said circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider Ext. P2 application preferred by the petitioner for revaluation and finalize the proceedings by publishing the result, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 'ten weeks', from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, if the applications are otherwise in order. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE dnc