^a'":1. .--s'; '^w^ -1- CJG\, S ^•^.'''•i^a '^^"^iw 0-0 IN THE HIGH COURT QF^ JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR.C.G. WRIT PETITION^KJ^; (Petition under article 226; ofthe Constitution of India) PETITIONER ^. ..•••"%': / UPENDRAPRASADDANI ^.-••'^( ./' S/0 LATE SHRI SHANKAR PRASAD DANI ^•"V?^ ..•• AGED ABOUT-75 YEARS, R/0 TAKIA PARA, ^'.••SDV'I^-.--' _..__ _... . _.__ _.._ $:--\o..r /''ri^>\vy ./ (s'' \.-' ^yy <%./ RESPONDENTS DURG, TAH. & DISTT.-DURG (C.G.) VERSUS / : 1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DURG (C.G.) 2. COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPALCORPORATION, DURG (C.G.) ^ S^STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, -0^v THROUGHSECRETARY ^^^\ ^;\<!<AGRIYAPRASHASHAN& y ^" PARYAWARANMINISTRY.D.KS. \^-<~1 BHAWAN,RAIPUR(C.G.) ^o ^-" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 _OF TH&CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OF CERTIORARI / MANDAMUS AND DIRECTIONS H!G(+COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.ffi) No. 1237 Qf 2007 ''//'' PetiSroner Upendrs Prasad Dani Vereus Respondenls P.4unlcipa! Corporation and othsra SB: Hon'bte fA'. Justice Sau,sh K. Agnlhotri, J Shri Jitendra Gupia, Advocate forffiie pefinoner. Shri USkarsh Verma, Deputy Govt. Advocate for Uie respondsnt No.3. ^ •^- Thakur ORDER (Passed on U-ite 2nd day of Mareh, 2007) 1. Leamed counssf appearing for ttte petitioner subms'te that this Court vide order dated 22.7.2005, passed in W.P.No. 3159/2X)5, directed the appropriafe Committee of ths Mynteips! Cciporation, Durg, to decide the pending appeal within a period ofthrse months from the date of receipt of a copy of ShaS order. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the pstitioner, on insfruction, seeks for permisslon of Shis Court So withdraw Shis peSition to file appropriate peffion for non-comp!iance of fte order dated 22.7.2005 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 3159/2005. 3. Learned counse! appearing for the respondenVState has no objsction. The pefition ss dismisssd as wfUidrawn, wffi, the aforestatsd tibsrty. ConsequenUy, M(W}P No. 817/2007 stands dismissed. No coste. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge 4. Thep