1 CP IN THE HIGH COURT OF- JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH W.P. NQ. 262- /2Q06 ^^ H-^^ l^^n;\ •'-f &^.../.' c''^^ PETITIONER \^/-^ (^,l..-"e^-" r\v- <^~..*? <;''•' ^•'. ^ ^- ~sf ..• yfy ^' •K y^^ ..^ Johanlal Chandrakar, S/o - Shri Dhanush Lal Chandrakar, Aged about - 5's ^f* years, Head Clerk, i^ Govemment Badri Prasad Arts 8s Comraerce College, Aarang, Tahsfl 8s District - Raipnr, (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ,A.V> .GO?'1. ^^M. ^^^. :Mst^ •A " "• \.i- •-..'• / K •w/ v~' .^y' 1. Stateof Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Piigher Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipiir, District - Raipur, (C.G.). 2. The Commissioner, Higher Education Department, Raipur, (C.G.j. 3. The Pnncipal, Govemment Badri Prasad Arts SE Commerce College, Aarang, Tahsil 85 District - Raipur, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CuNSTLTUTIQN_QF INDIA_FQR ISSUANCE OF^APPROPKiATE WRITS, ORDERS, DIRECTIONS OR LIKE ETC. The petitioner raost respectfuUy states as under:- 1) THE PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As raentioned in the cause title above. XI-HC-22 31)^^)1 K-fM aii^sr sf>1 W?B Pathak/- ^ 'cs' ftj ^p ^/ y 'ffsg •^'l-'Ocl-'l, wrtl'M're, &i<'ii-yLi<,. Wtlvn Sh*l!cb^.fcA^^...^./.°6__ ^..—.,...............^..^....^^ 3iii?rwimtTftti 'te ^ 18.1-2006 Shri Gautam Bhaduri, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A. S. Kachhawaha, for the chT^ct<fr;T-qrR^T^ f^si' ^f^RZK ^T 3Tf:giT aft^r Application for urgent hearing Heard. Learned counsel for the p completed 20 years service and is Bound Promotion Scheme has notbf ^titioner submits that the petitioner has |to retire in June 20Q6, but benefit of Time ^en given fo him. He further submits that in State counsel does not disput^ the petitioner has completed 20 yeai the benefit of Time Bound Promotion jState; on advance copy. b ailowed. similar matter j.e. W.P. No.6504/20Q5, an o'rder has been passed by this Court 6n 4-1-2006. Hepraysforsimilarorcjer. ' the above fact. Having considered the facts a^id circumstances and in view of the factthat fs of regular service and has not been gjven Scheme and further in view of order passed in similar case i.e. W.P.No.6504/2005, it is directed that the concerned authority to consider and decide the'case of tlfie petitioner in accordance with law for grant of time bound promotion as early ^s ppssible within 1 5 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of thi communicated to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is alti Certified copy as per rutes. Copy to State counsel for con'jpliance, order. In case of refusal, the reasons be wed. Scj.i. Fa'<hruddf-n Judge [«^R^