IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39434 of 2009 MANOJ KUMAR SINGH SON OF PITAMBER SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 9.3.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 420, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-b)A/26/35 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner was intercepted on suspicion and from his possession two driving licenses were recovered, whereas arms were recovered from the person of the co-accused. Unfortunately when the petitioner was refused bail he fled away from judicial custody on 27.4.2004 and appeared only on 18.3.2009. In view of the period of incarceration and the nature of recovery, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Muzaffarpur in Brahampura P.S.case No.150 of 2003, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) that - 2 - the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )