BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Eighth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9871 of 2011 T. RABI @ THANKA RABI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED Vs THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTIKODU POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. C.K.M.APPAJI Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is accused and he was arrested and remanded to Judicial custody on 28.05.2011 for the alleged offences punishable under sections 341, 294(b), 307, 323, 394 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.82 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that a case has been registered against him for the offence punishable offence under Sections 341, 294(b), 307, 323, 394 and 506(ii) of IPC. He further submitted that the petitioner has already filed the bail application but it was stated that the petitioner was detained under Gundas Act and therefore, that bail application was dismissed and now, the Advisory Board has set aside for detention under Act 14 of 1982 and hence, he prays for enlargement on bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) would submit that the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 26.05.2011 at about 10 pm and a case has been registered under Sections 341, 294 (b), 307, 323, 394 and 506(ii) of IPC and investigation is going on. He further submitted that other ground cases and pending against the petitioner and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by either side that the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 26.5.2011 and even though the petitioner was detained under Act 14 of 1982, subsequently it was set aside and investigation is considerably over, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Padmanabhapuram and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. sd/- 08/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PADMANABHAPURAM 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTIKODU POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 5 THE OFFICER INCHARGE SUB JAIL, NAGERCOIL +1. CC to M/S. C.K.M.APPAJI Advocate SR.No.26540 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9871 of 2011 Date :08/08/2011 SMA/09.8.2011/7C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/