IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.2103 OF 1985 NO.2103 OF 1985 NO.2103 OF 1985 Jai Kulbir Singh & Ors. ...Plaintiffs Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Ors. ...Defendants Shri A.L.Pandya with Ms Nina Kapadia i/by Pandya Gandhi & Co for the Plaintiffs. Shri R.Y.Sirsikar for the B.M.C. Defendant Nos.2,3, 5 and 6 in person present. Ms Sangeeta Gudka for the Defendant No.7a to 7d. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : SEPTEMBER 05, 2007. : SEPTEMBER 05, 2007. : SEPTEMBER 05, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiffs has tendered consent terms. He states that the consent terms have been signed by the Plaintiff Nos.1B, 1D and 3 as well as by constituted attorney of Plaintiff No.2 and the Plaintiff No.1D has signed the consent terms for himself and as constituted attorney of Plaintiff No. 1C. The Plaintiff No.1B, the Plaintiff No.1D, the constituted attorney of Plaintiff No.2 and the Plaintiff No.3 are stated to be personally present. The learned counsel for the Plaintiff states that the consent terms are signed by Defendant Nos.2 and 3. He states that Defendant No.2 has signed the consent terms in his ... 2 ... capacity as the constituted attorney of Defendant Nos.5 and 6. The learned counsel for the Plaintiff states that he personally identifies the Defendant Nos.2,3 and 6 who are personally present in the Court. The learned counsel appearing for the Defendant No.7A to 7D states that the Defendant No.7D has signed the consent terms for himself and as the constituted attorney of Defendant No.7A to 7D. He states that the Defendant No.7D is personally present in the court. The counsel appearing for the Plaintiffs and the counsel for the Defendant Nos.7A to 7D state that the parties who are present in the Court admit the correctness of the contents of the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The learned counsel appearing for the first Defendant states that he has no instructions and he has not even received a copy of the consent terms. The learned counsel for the Plaintiff states that the consent terms have been approved by the Law Officer of the first Defendant. The suit shall be set down for further directions on Monday 10th September, 2007. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE