IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23845 of 2011 1.Uttimlal Yadav, Son of Late Nano Yadav. 2.Buchchilal Yadav, Son of Uttimlal Yadav. 3.Kripal Yadav, Son of Uttimlal Yadav. All Residents of village Jhara, P.S. Mahishi, District Saharsa. ---------- Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -------- Opposite Party ----------- 02/- 12/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The three petitioners apprehend their arrest, in connection with Begusarai Sadar SC/ST P.S. Case No. 89 of 2010 (G.R. No. 712 of 2010) for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 648, 341, 323, 504, 506, 448, 427, 452 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Section 3 (X) SC/ST Act, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, are named accused in this case with allegation of assault and abuse in order to put force for withdrawal of earlier lodged case under the Labour Act. Further, the case appears squarely covered under a decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in a case of “Jorgia Pentiah Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh reported in 2009 (1) BCCR 153 (SC)”. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Begusarai Sadar SC/ST P.S. 2 Case No. 89 of 2010 (G.R. No. 712 of 2010), subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)