IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRL.R.No.2596 of 2006 DATE OF ORDER: 22.12.2006 Manpreet Kaur ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent(s) CORUM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. AGGARWAL .*.*.*. Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate. M.M. AGGARWAL,J This is petition against order dated 28.11.2006 passed by Additional Sessions Judge,Gurdaspur whereby an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C of the prosecution was allowed and the present petitioner was directed to be summoned to face trial for the offence under Section 304-B IPC. On behalf of the petitioner, it is argued that at the time of alleged incident, she was 17 and half years of age. She is unmarried sister- in-law and that she did not commit any offence. During inquiry, she had been shown innocent by the police and that now she has been falsely involved. CRL.R.No.2596 of 200 #2# Petitioner is admittedly close relative. She is sister-in-law. Her name appears in the FIR and also in the statement of the complainant Jarnail Singh recorded during trial. Specific part has been attributed to her. I do not find any good ground to interfere. Dismissed. December 22, 2006 ( M.M. AGGARWAL ) manoj JUDGE