1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 546 of 2010 1. Ramsukh S/O Mangal 2. Rajendra Prasad S/O Mangal Ram 3. Smt Rajrani W/O Rajendra Prasad 4. Mohan S/O Rajendra Prasad 5. Mahesh S/O Anant Ram 6. Smt. Rekha W/O Deepak 7. Ravindra S/O Prem Singh 8. Smt Radha Devi W/O Prem Singh 9. Neetu @ Nitin S/O Ram Sukh 10. Smt Latesh Verma W/O Sanju 11. Smt Sushma W/O Neetu 12. Praveen S/O Swami Dayal 13. Seeta Ram S/O Paras Ram 14. Sanju @ Sanjay S/O Ram Sukh All R/O General Mahadev Singh Road Niranjanpur, Dehradun, Dist Dehradun. ………………………. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary home, Uttarakhand Dehradun. 2. Station House Officer, Police Station Patel Nagar, District Dehradun 3. Mahendra Singh Rawat In charge Inspector Police Station Patel Nagar, Dehradun, Dist Dehradun …………..Respondents. Shri Lokendra Dobhal Advocate present for the petitioners. Shri G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate, with Shri M.A.Khan, Brief Holder, present for the state Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. 2 Heard. (2) By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought quashing of the First Information Report dated 06.07.2010, which is registered as crime no. 209 of 2010, relating to offences punishable under section 224, 225, 147, 341, 353 I.P.C, and one punishable under section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, at Police Station Patel Nagar, District Dehradun. (3) Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the police entered in the houses of the petitioners and assaulted them. However allegation in the First Information Report discloses that when the police went to the spot to arrest the accused in connection with a crime no 202 of 2010, the petitioners and their ladies created the scene. The petitioners when arrested, they attempted and got freed by the mob at the spot from the custody of police. It is further alleged that the villagers of the petitioners blocked to the road and created jam on the road. (4) Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on 3 record, in the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is not inclined to interfere with the investigation. (5) Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that if the petitioners Ramsukh, Rajendra Prasad, Smt Rajrani, Mohan, Mahesh, Smt Rekha, Ravindra, Smt Radha Devi, Neetu @ Nitin, Smt Latesh, Smt Sushma, Praveen, Seeta Ram and Sanju surrender before the court concerned, their bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (Stay application 5517 of 2010 also stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt.09.07.2010 NP