IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.256 of 2008 1. BALMIKI YADAV, 2. SUBELAL YADAV AND 3. MANOJ YADAV ….. Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND 2. RAJA RAM YADAV … Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 27.11.2008. N.H./ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Perused the impugned order dated 29th January,2008 passed by F.T.C. V, Sheikhpura in Cr. Revision No.150 of 2006. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. On perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the matter has been remanded for fresh consideration and passing order in accordance with law mainly on the ground that no opportunity had been given to the informant to hear on the charge sheet. There appears no illegality in remanding the matter to pass fresh order after hearing the informant. In this view of the matter, this application is hereby rejected. The court below is directed to pass order in the light of the direction given in the revision after hearing the informant within one month of receipt of this order. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )