m THE HIGH COURT OF WDICATURE AT BILASPUR <C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0.^37^7 2004 PETITIONE&: ^^ .^•¥^ >c?'"° .A^°' ^>y^y ^-'''-.^" vfi'' r^ .^••^^ ^".^'".<^< ^^ x' ^\.^" w^ •^ RESPONDENTS: ..^n^ .y^ .^%? <*\.,- c/^' ^^ N ^n:w- ive, V^~ S/Q Lat®P^deste Ram Dliruve, aged about 35 years, Driver, District Public Relaticins office, Bilaspur R/o Sarkasda, Baadhawa Para, Bilaspar, Chhattisgarh VER^US 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Througfa the Secretary, Govemmenf ofChliattisgaili, DepartmentofPublic Relations, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Mantralaya Ratpw.C.G. 2. The Conuiiissioner, Directorate ofPublic Relations, Govemment ofCfahattisgarh, Chbota P^a, Raipw, C.G. 3. The Depufy Direcfor, Department ofPublic Relations, Govemment ofChhattisgarh, Gomposite Buildmg, EHstriet Bilasptir, C.G. WRIT PETITION U3NDER ARTICLE 226/217 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUENCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBTION. CERTIORARI. AND ANY OTHER WRITS, DfRECTIONSOR -t XI-HC—78 ^jTH^rr w*i(^ 7ST ^WM^, ^ti1-M<t<o, fs|<r)S'H^< L^f ^^9d7^ ^200 37I^?TT^^ (yif^^T) 371^1 ^FT f<rlJ<=h H^T 3TT^T^RW ^-c^ 08-12-2004 Shri Satyendra Sahu, Coun^ chi<<F<n41'< *i!^<nj"? Fs^l <p»i<^i< ^3tfW3T!^T »elfor fhe petitioner, Shri Sudhir Agrawal, Panel ^awyer for fhe State* AppUcation for ui^ent heaiii|tg is allowed. Heard, Leamed coiuisel for the pettitioner submits that (he matter relates to transfer of the petitioi3(er. He further submits lliat ttie petitioner has been traasferrcd ^rom. Bilaspur to Kawardha vide oiderdated 26-10-2004 (Annes petitioner is workmg as a DJ petitioner belongs to Scheduled fhat the petitioner has been -P/1), He also submite that the T, He also submite that the ibe Categoty, He also submits •ferred m mid session. He also subixdts fhat for fhe present f^ie petitioaer xnay be given an opportunity of filing the detaJLled iiepresentation before the coxnpetent authority of the x^spon^icnts, which shall he considexwi on its own merits m accordance w] Haviag considered and witjbiout expressing aoy opimon on the merits offhe case, ia the opiipon offhte Court, ends ofjustice will be servred tf a direction is g^ven to the petitioner to make a detailed representation raising hisj authority of the rcspondents alonjg with a copy of fhe petition and fhis order, wifhia 15 days, and oi| fhe corapetent autibiority of the rc| ^on Its own merite ia accordancl Lfhlaw. grievances before the competeiit such representation being fiied, ^poadents shall decide fhe saxne ^ with law as eady as possible XI.HG—78 '3T?^T^FT f^rli4> ^T^T 3?T?^T 5fRW Gowri ^ y^ ~h ^ "• l" 75ET ^|^j(^^ ^>tli<441<o, f®l<y1!'H^< NIH^tT 5h*l|ct» '^200 ^T[^?T TT^T (^qf^^T) '^mwHf^^rTii^ '^•1 preferably wtthia two month^ representation. Leamed counsel for petitioner has not been reUevejd be aUov^ed to coitfuiue. It is dtrected that if the other person has notjoiaed in xaay be aUowed to continue ti4 inade cleai' fhat if the petition^r person has alrcady joiaed ia not eutitle the petitiouer to Wifh the aforcsaid disposed of Consequently, M.W.P.Noj Cexli&ed copy as pwsr p^ace rejo|ta rulds 'Wr?feTzfr:f "RTR^ff'? feT^t <f^l^l< ^3TRm3n^T from the date of receipt of the ^he petitioner subiriits that fhe re|d< He prays that fhe petitioaer may betitioner has not been rcMeved and Iplace offhe petitioner, the petitioner fhe reprcsentation is decided. It is i^r has already beeii reMeved or otber of the petitioner, this osxier wiU at the earlier place ofpostmg. cjbservation^ this petitioa stands 4726/2004 also stands disposed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge <^-<^ -<3sS \k •\5