THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Contempt Case No.968 of 2008 Date:16th July, 2008 Between: Koppolu Pullaiah …Petitioner and 1. Secretary to Govt. of India, ministry of Home Affairs, Freedom Fighter Pension Cell, New Delhi & Ors. …Respondents. *** THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Contempt Case No.968 of 2008 JUDGMENT: This Contempt Case has been filed complaining disobedience of the order dated 15.11.2007 passed in WPMP No.18514 of 2007 in W.P.No.14715 of 2007. 2. Notice before admission came to be ordered on 22.09.2008. 3. 3rd respondent filed counter-affidavit. It is stated in the counter-affidavit that representation of the petitioner has been considered and necessary order has been passed on 04.09.2008. 4. When the Contempt Case came up for consideration, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 5. Heard learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents 2 and 3 and perused the material brought on record. 6. The direction given to the respondents in WPMP No.18514 of 2007 is to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.03.2007 and pass appropriate orders. The 3rd respondent stated in the counter-affidavit that the representation of the petitioner for allotment of house site has been considered and necessary memo dated 04.09.2009 has been issued. Copy of the memo. has been placed on record. Relevant portion of the memo reads as hereunder: “Government have revised the orders on assignment of Government land / house sites to Freedom Fighters and issued orders in G.O.Ms.No.181 Revenue (Assn.I) Department, dt.15.02.2006, in which it has been decided that, the eligibility for assignment of Agriculture land & House Sites would be within the native district instead of within the native Village. In view of the above present policy on assignment of Agricultural land/House Sites to Freedom Fighters the request of Sri Koppula Pullaiah, Freedom fighter native of Nalgonda District for assignment of house site in Ranga Reddy district deserves no consideration and is hereby rejected with an advise to apply tin Nalgonda District.” Issuance of memo dated 04.09.2008 amounts to substantial compliance of the interim order dated 15.11.2007 passed in WPMP No.18514 of 2007. 7. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:16th July, 2010. CS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Contempt Case No.968 of 2008 Dated:16th July, 2010