1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1776 OF 2008 Dr Sangeeta T. Amladi ...Petitioner v/s Greater Mumbai Municipal Corporation and others ...Respondents Mr S.K. Talsania, Sr. Counsel with Mr K.S. Bapat i/b M/s Desai and Desai and Associates for Petitioner. Mr A.Y. Sakhare, Sr. Counsel with Ms S.M. Modle for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr R.S. Ghodge i/b Mr A.S. Desai for Respondent No. 3. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND R.G. KETKAR JJ. DATE : 12TH AUGUST 2009. 2 P.C. :- 1] By this petition, the petitioner, who is presently working as Professor and Head of Department of Skin and Venereal Disease in Topiwala National Medical College, Mumbai Central, Mumbai, has made grievance against the order reverting her from the post of Professor to which she was promoted on adhoc basis to the lower post. Because of the interim order passed by this Court dated 12th June 2009, it is common ground that the petitioner continued to work in the same post i.e. Professor on adhoc basis, because of creation of supernumerary post. The petitioner has give notice for voluntary retirement to be effective from 15th October 2009. The learned counsel appearing for Corporation has placed on record a copy of the communication dated 11th August 2009, which is taken on record and marked  X for identification, by which the Corporation has accepted the notice provisionally and permitted the petitioner to voluntarily retire 3 with effect from 15th October 2009. The leaned counsel appearing for Corporation stated that in the letter it is stated that the notice for voluntary retirement is accepted provisionally because the Corporation wanted to check whether there are any departmental inquiries pending against the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for petitioner states that there are no inquiries pending against the petitioner and that the petitioner will not withdraw her notice to voluntary retirement till it becomes effective on 15th October 2009. The statements made by both the sides are accepted. In our opinion, in view of the fact that the interim order was operating because of which the petitioner was working as Professor and is retiring on 15th October 2009, it will be appropriate to dispose off the petition in terms of the interim order, especially paragraph 4 thereof. It is accordingly so ordered. Petition is disposed off. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private 4 Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. ( JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH ) ( JUSTICE R.G. KETKAR )