,fJS3t'»!S /^. '^ %k ^llan-*'' ?[l(l6fr VERSUS os.ai Narsinsh son of Paachram De-vaii.gaa., Aged about 50 years, R/o Tslab Road, Bilaigarh, Thajia & Tahsil -Bilaigarh, Distt. Raipur(C.G.j. State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough CoUector Raipur, Distt Raipur (C.G.). •'^^^i.r^^.l:;^^^^^; SECTIOi Present:- Shri A.S. Rajput, Adv.ocate forthe applicant. Ms, Sangeeta Mishra, P.L. for the State/respondent 1. This petition is directed again.st the order dated 23/10/2008 aud 24/10/2008 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur in criinia.al revision no. 19/2008 whereby leanied Second Additional Sessions Judge has allov.7ed the application for SupurdgiEaiiia of the vebicle H-i'va T'ruck but has imposed 3 coaditions. 2. Leamed counsel for the aDulicaiit subinits fLiat condition No. 2 i.e. ic.suraa.ee on the date of iacident is aot!possi.ble because on fhe date of incident period ofpoUcy was lapsed. Leara.ed couasel for the appticant lurther siibaiits that he will get it insured withiii 7 days and ffaereafter he will subiaitted fhe docuEients for iQtenai custody. 4. Counsel for fhe non-applicant are heai~d. 5. Order impugned penised it appears tliat on the date of coiimiission V ^ L^Y^^-L ^-^^ ^, ^ .-F' ^ ?' - •i /'.- it was not possible to iasure th.e vehicle on the date of incident i.e, post facto, imposmg ofsuch conditiori is not executable, 6. Consequenfly, the petition is aUowed aad conditioit relatiag to tlie insurance imposed by tlie revisional Court is modified.ifapplicant filed fhe docuaient ot insurance covenng present risk ihea properh' inay be given to iaterim custody ic. terms oforder iia.pugned. Sd/- -—--- T.P. Sharma Judge