cp476.10 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 476 OF 2010 Gayabai w/o Baburao Kadam and others ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... Mrs. M.D. Thube-Mhase, advocate for the petitioners Mr. V.G. Ghatge, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. S.G. Sangle, advocate for respondent No.3 ..... CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. DATED: 21ST MARCH, 2011 PER COURT:- 1 The petitioners are alleging non observance of the direction issued by this Court on 20.1.2010 in writ petition No. 314 of 2010. While disposing of said writ petition, this court directed the authorities to decide the petitioners' representations in respect of payment of amount of rental compensation, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within eight weeks from the date of passing of order. It is the contention of the petitioners that although the acquiring body has paid the amount towards rental compensation, the amount of interest receivable on the amount of rental compensation from the date of entitlement of the petitioners till the amount is disbursed, has not paid cp476.10 -2- to the petitioners. 2 The direction issued by this Court while disposing of writ petition was in respect of disposal of representations tendered by the petitioners. According to the respondents, they have complied with the direction issued by this court inasmuch as representation has been decided and the amount of rental compensation has also been paid. 3 In these circumstances, it cannot be held that there is any intentional violation of direction issued by this court while disposing of the writ petition. If the petitioners have any grievance in respect of payment of amount of interest on the amount of rental compensation receivable by them, the petitioners may have to avail of remedy in accordance with the provisions of law. So far as this contempt petition is concerned, in view of the decision rendered by respondents in respect of representations tendered by the petitioners, the grievance made in respect of non observance of order passed in writ petition No. 314 of 2010 does not survive. The contempt petition devoid of substance and stands rejected. ( R.M. BORDE. J.) rlj/ cp476.10 -3-