- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2934 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.2934 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.2934 OF 2008 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.S.G.Rajput for the applicant Mr.Y.S.Shinde A.P.P. for State Mr.J.G.Bhanushali for Respondent No.2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 25,2008 : SEPTEMBER 25,2008 : SEPTEMBER 25,2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the second respondent states that in view of filing of the charge sheet, the second respondent will not prosecute the private complaint. 2. A petition filed by the applicant for quashing the F.I.R has been rejected by the Division Bench of this court. Now, the charge sheet has been filed after completion of investigation. Therefore, no case is made out for exercising the power under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 for quashing the proceeding. - 2 - 3. Subject to what is observed above, the Criminal Application is rejected. However, hearing of the pending case is expedited. It is made clear that this order will not preclude the Applicant from making appropriate application before the trial court. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE