HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Second Appeal No. 163/2007 Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh. *J. AoDellant PIaintiff Respondent Defendant Chakravarty, Son of Ram Badari Pandey, aged about 78 years, Occupation Agriculture, Resident of Village Thadpathar, Poiice Station Biharpur (Chandni), Tahsil Surajpur, pistrict Surguja VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Collector, Surguja Ambikapur (C.G.) Second Appeal under Sectlon 100 of the Code of Civii Procedure. 1908 Present:- Shri Ashok Kumar ShukSa, counsel for the appeilant. Shri Akhi! Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 7th day of May, 2007) Heard on admission. 2. The appellant is aggrieved by ihe judgment and decree dated 2.2.2007 jn Civii Appeal No. 58-A/2005 by llnd Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Surajpur, District Surguja affirming the judgment and decree dated 18.03.2005 passed in Civil Suit No. 14-A/2003 by Civil Judge, Class-11, Surajpur whereby the plaintiffe' suit for dedaration of title over the suit land was dismissed. 3. Brief facts are that the appellant/plaintiff was a landtess person. !n violation of the Rules, a patta was granted to the plaintiff over the suit landl which was cancell.ed by the Collector, Surguja on 7.1.2003 in exercise of his revisional jurisdictipn. Both the Courts below on proper appreciation of evidence and the materiai on record, recorded a finding that the appellant herein was not entitled.to the relief sought. -""r' - ^ r^, 4. I am of the considered opinion, no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. 5. In view of above, I.A. No. 1 which is an application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C. also stands dismissed. 1 No order as to costs. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ^Vf