IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2812 OF 2011 DATE OF DECISION: FEBRUARY 15 ,2011 Sant Ram Bhardwaj .....Petitioner VERSUS The Indian Olymp ic Association, New Delhi and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Vikram Punia, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. (ORAL) The petitioner had earlier filed a writ petition, challenging the appointment of adhoc body on the ground that he has been duly elected as a Secretary General of the Haryana State Fencing Association. During the pendency of the writ petition, it was revealed that election had been held and elected body had taken charge of the Association. The writ petition filed by the petitioner was disposed of as having become infructuous. The petitioner never took any permission to challenge the election. That was the reason for earlier writ petition having been rendered as infructuous. Now the petitioner has filed this writ petition to challenge the election primarily on the ground that the election can not be held prior to 4 years. The earlier elected body concededly was not allowed to function. Since the elected body has taken charge, I am not inclined to interfere in exercise of writ jurisdiction in the functioning of the elected body. The petitioner could have made a grievance before the election. He could have participated in the election, if he has a majority. No case for interference is made out. Dismissed. February 15,2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE