BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twelfth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13560 of 2011 SUNNY @ K.J.JOHN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PATTIVEERANPATTI POLICE STATION, DIDNIGUL DISTRICT IN CR.NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.SARAVANAN Advocate For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, for alleged offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, has come forward with this petition seeking for anticipatory bail. 2. Though the petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that neither a case is registered nor a petition is pending with the respondent and the apprehension of arrest is baseless. 3. Considering the above rival submissions and since the apprehension of arrest is baseless, this petition is dismissed. Sd/- 12/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PATTIVEERANPATTI POLICE STATION, DIDNIGUL DIST 2 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. A.SARAVANAN Advocate SR.No.35353 ssk/14.10.2011 /4C -1p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13560 of 2011 Date :12/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/