In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh F.A.O. No. 2983 of 2008 Date of decision: August 26, 2009 Anaro Devi and another .. Appellants Vs. Pawan Kumar and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate for the Insurance Company. A.N. Jindal, J This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 11.3.2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fatehabad, whereby the claim petition filed by the appellants-claimants has been dismissed. Arguments heard at length. Notwithstanding the fact that the negligence of Pawan Kumar-respondent No.1 could not be proved as DDR (Ex.R-1) reveals that the accident took place par chance and not on account of the fault on the part of the respondent No.1. However, the Insurance Company-respondent No.3 cannot escape the payment on account of no fault liability. As such, the appeal is dismissed with the modification in the judgment that the respondent No.3 would be liable to pay Rs.50,000/- to the claimants on account of no fault liability. The company is directed to deposit Rs.50,000/- within 45 days from the date of receipt of the copy of the order failing which the claimants would be entitled to recover interest @ 6% per annum from the date of claim petition till realization. No order as to costs. August 26, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge