IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 12TH JUNE 2009 / 22ND JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 15776 of 2009(N) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- M/S. VS EDDYS WORLD, 35/18A (B), VENUS CASTLE, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI-682 025, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, V.SREENIVASAN. BY ADV. MR.C.K.SREEJITH RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. COMMERCIAL TAX INSPECTOR, COMMERCIAL TAX CHECK POST, WALAYAR. 2. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, COMMERCIAL TAX CHECK POST, WALAYAR. 3. THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX CHECK POST, WALAYAR. 4. RETIRED OFFICER IN CHARGE, HELP DESK, COMMERCIAL TAX CHECK POST, WALAYAR. 5. THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, TREASURY COUNTER, COMMERCIAL TAX CHECK POST, WALAYAR. 6. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ........................................................................ W.P.(C) No. 15776 OF 2009 ......................................................................... Dated this the 12 th June, 2009 J U D G M E N T The case of the petitioner is that the goods covered by Exts. P3 to P5 were actually purchased by the petitioner paying the requisite sale consideration, so as to give the said item to M/S. Sree Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences, though the name of the consignee was shown as Sree Narayana Institute of MedicaL Sciences and not the petitioner. The mistake stated as committed by the first respondent is sought to be directed to be cured in the present Writ Petition. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievances have already been projected before the first respondent by filing Ext.P8 representation and that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction to the first respondent is given to consider the said representation and pass appropriate orders thereon. W.P.(C) No. 15776 OF 2009 2 3. In the said circumstances, the first respondent is directed to consider Ext.P8 representation and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, of course, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and also to the concerned consignee whose name is given in Exts. P3 to P5. This shall be finalised as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk