IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2318 OF 2010 Between: Smt M.Anjinamma @ Peddakka …PETITIONER AND Nagaraju and others. .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2318 OF 2010 O R D E R: The Revision Petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.179 of 2007, on the file of the court of Junior Civil Judge, Hindupur. The suit is filed for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants / respondents herein from interfering with the plaint schedule properties. Pending the suit, the petitioner/plaintiff filed I.A.No.470 of 2007, under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking temporary injunction. After hearing both sides, I.A.No.470 of 2007 was dismissed by order dated 4.02.2008. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred C.M.A.No.9 of 2008, on the file of the court of Senior Civil Judge, Hindupur. The said appeal was also dismissed by order dated 29.06.2009. Hence, this revision petition by the plaintiff. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having gone through the material available on record, I do not find any justifiable reason to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the Courts below on appreciation of the evidence adduced by the parties. Consequently, the Courts below cannot be said to have committed any error in dismissing the application for temporary injunction. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, there shall be a direction to dispose of the main suit expeditiously following due process of law. No costs. _____________ G.ROHINI, J JUNE 15, 2010. YVL