Civil Revision No.7522 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.7522 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.11.2010 Iqbal Jit Singh and another ....Petitioners Versus Smt. Pritam Kaur and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. O.P. Goyal, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Shilpa Sahi, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Present petition is filed by the plaintiffs assailing the order dated 12.5.2009 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hisar as well as the order dated 22.9.2010 passed by Additional District Judge, Hisar, rejecting the application of the plaintiffs seeking ad interim injunction, restraining the defendants not to alienate the property and not to disturb the possession of the plaintiffs. Both the Courts below have observed that possession and title of defendant No.2 is recorded in the revenue record since long, which was never challenged by the plaintiffs. Placing reliance on the revenue entries, both the Courts have rightly declined the injunction as far as interference in the possession of the plaintiffs is concerned. However, settled principle of law is, if any alienation is made during the pendency of the case, it shall be hit by principle of lis Civil Revision No.7522 of 2010 (O&M) -2- pendens irrespective of refusal of the ad interim injunction In view of this, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned orders. Dismissed. However, it is clarified that suit shall be decided without being influenced from the observations made in the impugned order. (Alok Singh) Judge November 18, 2010 R.S.