IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-28956 of 2010 Date of Decision: July 06, 2011 Kamlesh @ Kala Devi & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Saini, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR No.137 dated 14.4.1999 under Sections 406, 498-A, 506 IPC, Police Station, City, Yamunanagar, and consequent proceedings, on the basis of compromise. 2. Respondent No.2, Savita was married to petitioner No.5, Ram Pal. On account of matrimonial disputes, the Crl. Misc. No. M-28956 of 2010 [2] FIR came to be lodged at the instance of respondent No.2. On the intervention of respectable, all the disputes have been settled by way of compromise. So much so, divorce by way of mutual consent has been granted under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act. Petitioner No.5 and respondent No.2 are now living separate. It has been pleaded that peace and harmony in the lives of petitioners and respondent No.2 would be disturbed by continuance of proceedings. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-State contends that indeed, all the disputes between the parties have been settled by way of compromise and the said factum has been verified. 4. Having considered the contentions of the learned counsel and particularly considering the nature of disputes and offences, the petition is allowed. FIR No.137 dated 14.4.1999 under Sections 406, 498-A, 506 IPC, Police Station, City, Yamunanagar, and consequent proceedings, are hereby quashed. (AJAI LAMBA) July 06, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?