i^_^i^. ^II.1:89A(Jail} - p.J.P.R. 11/94/2,000 CF0000060503 APPEAL OF PRISONER :f, ^L. bp........^^.....-.........».........;'Name..^?KR]^.........................-^^^^ !Fatber'sname..^^J%...^I^^;fel^5^^eW^°^^^ _» ^ - ' .'" .^. ^, ._;,<T> ~' ~ SOTT—^fc^^Ce-ffSt) jResidence .s^|U<aicyu^;.............:....;... Age ........^5>. fSentenced <tp ^ff^STOSSWy^T................ On... ..Mc^^fl^. lunder^^i^.ioi.'aT^1^'^..1. by'^T.%&^.<i3P%.Al^.^^^1aT1t It isexplained to the prisoner that if he states^^wishes to be represented by legal (^TBS^? jfpractitiBner the Apfiellate-Court will not procesdwith the base'ifor, seveu days unless 1 the legal practitioner appears .Jf the legar praetitioner does not appear within seven |dayshemay;nqtheardata]l'.If;(he prispner state's that he does riot wish to be repre- sented by legal practitipner tfae court may pruceed at once with the case and will not be obliged tbgive a tiearing to ahy legal practitioner who should appear . 1 Date of Applicarion for copy of Judgement ........ ... 2 Uate on whieh copyreceived ............... 3 Dateon WhieUAppealsent.............. .......................... ... 4 Whether thte prisbner wishes to be represented or not - Yes / No No....^55......,-.............<.;...... . . .. Name .::?^[?TO 5?o^^.."..............." k Confiaedin.....,-:TW^^.l:.,........... Jail .<5£f^.1^..-„.. No...,...~..a».$5'^rfe .. 1 E)atedl.,.,,.;.^4^^J 199^., rx Porwarded tp the CHIBF JUDrciAT Mft^TSTffi<iTETp'p.^<G'S^y%?^<S&^y togather which a copy of judgement or order passed ia the-case.for.^f^vQur of trans-' mission to the prpper AppeU^teCourt. ^^l'^]w^ r^ii^tfl fiJTCE SuperintendSnf ^JI^''^. Bntrf^:s ^SD^M^ V'" Memo ofAppealtoifaeAppehatecourt ......^^/.».l3»flt^,<^^>tMAt !No Dated 1h z Forwarded to the .......... ..l.j....'............;....-...^.K fs-^i^-v- .?.a.--A pat-e"o'£.receiptin Appellate Court... .1. - .........'.. ,„.., Dateofreceiptin..............;..;....:....v...,^.pffice....-^<^<».^ .,,•,;, .,., . .,. , . , ^^.QMHCt^^ST~ Date of receipt record to acco'mpany the .—.........5..,^.........."">"K%. i~*-.-.;->?.'K<.-' 'C'JP."'T.-©.^ '•WS;-' !•• X. XI-HC-78 HIHWI ShHltft 3^'-<iNi<'t<i, a^nu'16, &cti«y —-'6?....^-..<?<>/?.8. o ^ 2»e~~ an^wrag? (l?'A°"<dr) sn^r w ft-ii* (WTsn^TOTisf; SRITW ^rfs? sn^r °bi<iF<i<fl-< iiHnT ff te^ Kfsre^R ^;3lf^lT3TT^T &jvisisn Bench;^ Hon'bie Mr. L.C. Bh.adoo anU Hon^!8JA!\_VX Shrivas^a. JJ ffi.rs. Uma Tiwori, cpun^ Mr. Akil Mishr'a.Pane! Ors! judqment dictateiB Psr L.C. Bhadoo. J: - ^ei for the appeiiant. 1-awyer for the State/respondent. on Dais. Th';s appeai is directec) of sen+ence dcted 12-11-1997 KhairagQrh, in Sessions Trial l^o Jud9®after hoiding the accu\ undsr Section 302 of ths 3. namely, Parvsti Bai, sentencei? a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in defai(l for six months. against the judgment of conviction snd orde" passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, i.68/96,. wher'eby learned Additionai Sessions ied/appetlant 9uiity for commission of offencs .P.C. for cosnmitting the murdsr of his wife him to under90 imprisonment for life and psy It of payment of fine to further undergo R.I. Cose of +ha or'osecutitin c.m. when Parvati Bai, wife Khamariya and when she covej b'shind cnd scid that nnow, yot| with a knife for five times started oozinq out of ths in| consin9 towards thot side, reachsd near hjs daughter appeiiant Ra-tiram Mdira heas i, in brief, is thot on 24-12-1995 at about 9 of the aecused, was going to market TTion j'sd a distance of 1 km., the accused come from go to the mQfket for ir.'ho!e doy" cnd cttacked s result of. which, she feli down and blood luries. As the fafher of Parvati Bai was aSso he ccnie to know about the incident, he (and on enquiry she informed thdt accused/ lattacked her with the knife. On this, she was <ts when P.T.O. Jl Xl-HC-78 *<WMI Stl*1|tt» 3sraOTT?Fr, tfTfl'M'is, f°«iwy .^:A:<ff? ^T 2ft0~ 3{^1 W<h(^y^t) sn^T ^iT I^IT^; aqT?iraTsti1 g?(TTW HfScT-W^T WilfepfrT WRTl''ff fe^t rf^TOTC ^;3tf^T3:n^T taken to Poiice Stction: Sahol; ths scme day crt-about4 p.m. of the I.P.C. and sent Parvatl Health Centre, 5<3haspu" 4' examined the injuriss of P4 wounds on epigcsTnum regi lufflbar- region on postsrior report Ex.P-9. He also sr's&srsd ths rssort £x.P"lll succumbed to ths injuries su| on which +hs offencs was conl After giving notice Ex prspared Panchnama of the body was sent for post-morts where Dr. D.C. Jain conducte report Ex.P-17. Site pian memor-eanduffl (Ex.P-3) based his instance under Ex.P-4, s< Forensic Science Laboratory receivea. Aftsr- compietion of in' of Judiciai Magistrate, First csse to the 5essions Judge, ^Sessions Judge, Khairogorh, ipur Lohara and she gave the repopt Ex.P-12 on The police cegistered crime under Section 307 Bai for examination of her injuries to Primary ihfira where, Or. A.K. Sht-iviastavc (PW-10) 'vcti Bsi and noticed as many cs ten incised >n, riaht renal angie, vertsbral coiumn, left ide cnd right thiyh. He prepared the injury ext^mined the knife, the weapon of offence, and Howsvsr, during the treatmsnt, Pan'cti Bai itained by her cnd died on 31s Januory, 1996, /erted into Section 302 of ths I.P.C. P-7, to the Ponchas, the Investi9atin9 Officer iead body of Parvoti Bai (Ex.P-8). Tne desd CT to Mekohara Hospitai, Raipur under Ex.P-16, post-mor-tem and prepared the post-mortem Ex.P-18 wss prepared. The sccused gave |n whieh the knife was taken into possesfiion at ihie was sent for chemical sxaminQtion to tha Rsipur, fr-om where the report Ex.P-21 was |estigction, charge shaet was filed in the Court ICIass, Kawardha, who in turn committed the Rajnandgaon, from where Searned Additionsl 'tceived the case on trans'fer •for' trial. P.T.O. Xl-HC-78 tlTO'WT flWl^i S^t^TFTRpr, t»Tfl<H'i<o, fsxniuy ..C^..A^.<?.te © 3 ^PT see- 3ll^s?l 4sicn (yi^'a^'T) an^Tqa'R^ich traTSn^TsbHich STdTW CTfStf W^T •tii^td'ifl-f timciTir'tecA<Riwi< ^iSTfWTSI^T TTis prosecution in ord| exiamined 11 wltnesses. Statt Section 313. of.the Cr.P.C. in ham in the prosecution eviden^ Additionci Sessions Judge:pfte| Prosecutor 2hc! counssl for ticcused as mentioned in parc 1 Spr to establish chsrge against the accused rlzmsnt of the cccussd «»asrecorded under w|iich he dsnied ths matsrial appearing a9ains+ ;e and ststed thot he is innocent. Learned hecring the crguments of Additionol Publis 'hs accussd. convictsd and seritancsd the (if this judgment. We have hsard Mrs. Uitso Qnd Mr. Akhil Mishrc, iearn^d resDondent. ntt'ari, Isarned counsei for the appe'lcnt Panei LQwyer on behaif of the State/ The homicidal death of counsei for thecppellant. Apaj (Ex.P-12) made by Psrvati Bai b^ fhe orcl dyin9 declcration ma<^e iookir'9 "o the evidence of &r. (Ex.P-9) and the post mortem| dsath of Parvoti 8ai wos homici< farvati Bai has not been disputed by learried •t from that, tookino to the dy'in9declG!"ation lodgin9 tl12 report befors Polics Ststion and ^e before her- fcther' Dhiraji (PW-2) as aiso A.K. Shrivastava (PW-10), the injury report report (Ex.P-17), it is estabiished that the <Ual in nature. •d4y As far as invoivement concerned, Dhircyi pW-2), syidsnce that on the fsteful for market Than Khamariya, bu\ inflate the tyres, in the mean t and the accused a!i of s suddeh ^f the occused in the crime in question is ftither of the deceased hos stated in his he alon9 with his daughtar Par'vsti Bai left he stayed back at the cycle shop in order to |me, Porvati Bai had covered certain distance came from behlnd and ottacked her with a P.T.O. XI-HC-78 an^fTsRTR-ii* mir SD^I spTNi <© RIHCTISt»^l«i 3^'::WTRW, ®TTly'IS,Rl<1^y .fc,A:<:fO./^ 4 ^-^e^ 3ll^<l Macn ('i^t^l'i.'T) TOTTWtti'giTsn^T knife, as a rssult of which she fsther came to know, he iihmed Psrvcti Bci was Ivina snd on Ratirara (her husband) assau! scene oT occur'rencs. Thus, Parvati Bci fp.a^i. bhiraji (PW-2) who has proy^d eorroborated by the fsct th< ineworandum Ex.P-3 reysrdil pursusnce of that he got r< W3S found stcmed t'.'ith biood,| F.S.L., Raipur and ss per the Sari of Parvoti 8si was taken aiso found stdned with bl declcration made by Psrvo| corroborated by the c« knife ct the instance of the involvement of the accu3e<i established. In ths cir-cum; iilegaiity or infirmity in the fii ttict ircum^tant As far as conviction iesrned counssl for the sppe husbcnd & wife, cs tha wjfe ^g-operly, without any intenti <*iiitc<41-< iTiiRff ff te^t <R|'KIK ^ SI^IT 3TI^T received injuries and fell down. When her !iate!y rushed towards the piace whers nquiry Parvati Bai informed him thct accussd •ed hsr, snd therecfter, he has f'sd fron' the ^is ore! dyin9 dsclar-ction bsfore her fcther' the same. The said dying decicirction stands the accused while in polics custody aave (ig the. plase where he kept the knifs and in the knife under Ex.P-4. The said knife Isame wss sent for chemicsl exain'mction to the rsport Ex.P-21, blood iwas found on the knlfe. into possession under Ex.P-5 and the ssma wds l|;od. Therefore, based on the oral dying l|'i Bai before her father Dhir'cji (PW-2), •iai evidence i.e. recovery of b!ood stained ((ccused and recovery of the biood stcined sori in committing the crime in question is ^tances, to this extent, we do not find any ijidingof the tnai Court. Ijnder Section 302 of the I.P.C. is concerned, l|ant argued thst thsre wcs a dispute between w^is saylng to the accused that he is not working intentiitn to cause death, the accused sssaulted the P.T.O. Xl-HC-78 TS5 •^ww'4, ^Tily'Ko, (ei^iyy . fo.ft,^ *11*1dl a>HT^ Sll^l 4ach ('^ctt^Gi^.iT) 311^T qiT f^lN; ;rai31R?rsh1|cb ?T(IIW BfgtT 3TI^?T <»ii'i|fa<n'< Hwm' tffs^8 <Ri«i< ^arf^Tsn^T decsssed on 24-12-19.95, whe^ month ssven dsys i.e. on 31" Ja| accused does not travel beyondl •eas the dececsed died after a gcp of ona luary', 1996. Therefore, offence ogaslnst the Section 304 Part-II of the I.P.C. iear-Aed On the other heind, iear-1 the tria! Court snd sr9ued thst ths sceused has ri9htiy besn co| In ordsr to appreciGte fo" the piarties, we hcvs peru^ dscecsed sustained injuries i\ Januory, 1996. AAoreover, iiche| not working properly, as a decesssd isith knife in Q fit d betwsen the incicent and ths de uf the incident, it can be inferr with intantion to ccuse her deai caused the iR.juries so irBiriinsm causs dsath. Panei Lowyer supported ths jud9ment of iookina t°ti1e nsture snd numbsr of injui-ies, ihvicted uxdsr Ssction 302 of th®!.?.€. rhe arquments cdvanced by lecrnsd counsel ed the record. It is not disputsd thst the |n 24-12-1995, wherees she died on 31 h the deceassd asked the accussd that he is r^sult of anqer, ths accusad assaulted the (f onger. Therefor's, coupied with the gssp jcth occurred i.a. after one month seven days led that the nccused assauited the deceased 1th. It cannot ba inferred that tha cccused |'y dangerous thct it raust in ali probabillties In the circumstonces, wespon of offence used, we';| under Sec+ion 304 Psrt-I of thi ooking to the nature of injuries cnd ths |re of the consider-ed opinion thct offence I.P.C. 'is wade out agQinst the accused. P.T.O. XI-HC-78 sn^TqiiR^jch (WT3TR?TCTW >IT< 5omc ^ Hfflcn SKKIch 3sr -MWIM<<, »xTiy'i<o, Ri<nit)^< ^..&?:.ft:..3?.^^sw- w^?TTgw (yfi^qqir) ?TaTWHf?cT3TI^T In the result, fhe appe aliowed. While settin9 aside sccused under Section 302 ofl Section 304 Part-I of the I.P.C.I ten ye.ws eight mo.nths. It js 12-1995, thgreby.he nas airead^ He be set ct liberty forthwith, Partiss are en+itled for c| L.C. Bhndoo Judge ..=-^ cbi^fcfifl.) wRft'irfeiA<Rt+<;i< ^i 3Tf^tT 3n^?T \sl partiy succeeds cnd the same is partly ^onviction and sentence imposed upon the the Z.P.C., the accused is convicted under \and sentenced to undergo it-nprisonment for stjited that the accused is in custody since 27- undergone the sentence imposed upon him. i^ not required in any other case. krWu Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge P.T.O.