THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO :20754 of 2009 DATED: 24-09-2009 Between: Smt.T.Sharada Bai. ..... PETITIONER And The Joint Collector, Medak District & another. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: The authorization of the petitioner was cancelled by the 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Medak by an order, dated 08-09-3009, and the same is challenged in this Writ Petition. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for the respondents. 3. Sri Bollam Lingaiah Yadav, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, without affording any opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, simply passed the impugned order. According to him, had the petitioner been given an opportunity of explaining personally she would have explained everything in detail and hence the said order is bad under law. 4. In my considered view, the above aspect cannot be gone into by this Court for the reason that the petitioner is having an alternative efficacious remedy of appeal as provided for under Clause 20 of the Control Order. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the appellate authority and file an appeal within a period of ten days and on such appeal being filed, the 1st respondent-Joint Collector, Medak District may decide the appeal at the earliest, preferably, within a period of four weeks and pass appropriate orders. If for any reason the appeal is not disposed of within the time stipulated, the authorization of the petitioner shall be restored and she shall be permitted to distribute the scheduled commodities to the card holders. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ T.GOPALAKRISHNA,J 24th September, 2009. Note: Issue operative portion of the order by wire at party’s costs. B/o Tsy