IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13319 of 2009 Dr. Bhagwan Prasad, S/o Late Keshav Prasad, resident of Mohalla-Baluatal, P.S.-Town (Motihari), District-East Champaran. ……………………………………Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Director, Department of Animal Husbandry, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Joint Secretary, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Deputy Secretary, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Accountant General, Bihar. ……….Respondents. ----------- 2. 12. 10. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also Mr. Jitendra Kumar Rai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Account General, Bihar. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation he has been paid the amount of leave encashment only 127 days instead of 300 days. On receipt of communication with regard to 127 days earned leave on 17th June, 2008, he filed a representation before Respondent No.2 claiming to the effect that he should have been paid the amount of 300 days earned leave. It is submitted that above representation has remained unconsidered till date. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case petitioner files a representation stating details of his claim, the same shall be considered as per law without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his 2 claim, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before Respondent No. 3. In case, such representation is filed along with relevant documents in support of his claim as also certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today, Respondent No. 3 shall consider and dispose of the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the aforesaid claim of the petitioner could be settled without delay. With the above observations/directions, the writ application stands disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)