IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2009 / 1ST MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 29659 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- S.JAYAPRAKASH, S/O.SUBRAMANIAN, AGED 43 YEARS, VANIYATHARA HOUSE,PAZHAMBALACODE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 544. BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENT: --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ----------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 29659 of 2008 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that by Exhibit P3 proceedings dated 14/06/2008, regular permit was granted, subject to settlement of timings. Complaint in this writ petition is that since the grant of permit despite lapse of more than two years, timing has not been settled, as a result of which permit granted has not been issued. 2. On instruction learned Government pleader submits that the proceedings relating to Exhibit P2 could not be traced out in the office of the respondent and that it was therefore, that the delay occurred. If as a matter of fact by Exhibit P3, permit was granted, it is the duty of the respondent to settle the timings. So long as the genuineness of Exhibit P3 proceedings is not disputed, there is nothing wrong in acting upon the same. Writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent that timing conference in pursuance to Exhibit P3 shall be convened as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within eight weeks of production of copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm