IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 19 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 650 OF 2008 SHRI. DURGA ENGLISH SCHOOL THROUGH CHAIRMAN PARIS VAMAN KAMBLI AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus SHRI. YESHWANT P. DHORE AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Shri D. J. Pangam, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri I. Agha, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Respondent No.1 in person. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 24th November, 2011 P.C.: The above petition has been filed on the ground that despite of an order granted by this Court not to reinstate the teacher, the respondent no.3 had gone ahead and carried out such reinstatement. 2. At the hearing of the above petition, the Counsel appearing for the respective parties do not dispute that by an order dated 12/10/2011 the order of the reinstatement has been revoked by the respondent no.3. It is also not disputed that in view of the said order the grievance of the petitioner that respondent no.3 had committed the contempt does not survive. 3. In view of the above, I find no reason to proceed with the above petition and consequently the petition stands disposed of. Notice, if any to the respondents, stands discharged. F. M. REIS, J. NH