(Spl.-H.C.A.S.,C.D.,78-e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 654 OF 2003 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Memoranda of Quorum, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri S. S. Kantak, advocate for the petitioners. Shri Umesh Rao, advocate for the respondent no.2. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. DATE : 27th July, 2004 P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute that the challenge in this petition is now covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Mardia Mardia Mardia Chemicals Chemicals Chemicals Etc.,Etc. vs. Union of Etc.,Etc. vs. Union of Etc.,Etc. vs. Union of India India India & Ors. Etc. Etc. & Ors. Etc. Etc. & Ors. Etc. Etc., decided on 8th April, 2004. Having regard to the observations of the Supreme Court in paragraph 83 of the judgment, we consider it appropriate to permit the petitioners to file an appeal under Section 17 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of - 2 - Security Interest Act, 2002, within the period of limitation prescribed by the Act to be reckoned from today. Petition disposed of in the above terms. S.A. BOBDE, J. N.A. BRITTO, J.