:1: Chandka IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION JUDGE’S ORDER NO. 488 OF 2007 JUDGE’S ORDER NO. 488 OF 2007 JUDGE’S ORDER NO. 488 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 211 OF 2005 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 211 OF 2005 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 211 OF 2005 Naresh Punwani & Anr. ..Plaintiffs versus M/s. Giltedge Management Services Ltd. ..Defendants Mr. Naushad Engineer i/b. M/s. Desai & Chinoy for the Plaintiffs. Ms. D. Dey for the Official Liquidator. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 20TH DECEMBER, 2007. DATE : 20TH DECEMBER, 2007. DATE : 20TH DECEMBER, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard. 2. In view of the fact that the plaintiffs - decree holders were pursuing the permission to proceed with the execution proceedings under Section 446 of the Companies Act and since that took some time and was granted some time on 26.11.2007, there has been a delay in levying this execution. There is no dispute that the decree has been passed and there is no stay operating on the said decree. :2: Chandka Hence, it would be appropriate to permit the Plaintiffs to execute the decree dated 20.12.2005 in Summary Suit No. 211 of 2005 before sealing of the decree as provided under Rule 314 of the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules, particularly with regard to the fact that the period of two years contemplated by Order XXI Rule 22 is due to expire today. Order accordingly. 3. Judge’s Order disposed of. (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)