IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15334 of 2009 RAMPATI DEVI,wife of Munarik Yadav @ Munarika Pd., resident of village- Marhipar,P.S.-Dhanarua,District-Patna. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 04-05-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Allegation is there regarding demand and torture for its non-fulfilment, ultimately of killing, in which submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that Nanad of the deceased has been allowed anticipatory bail, while father-in-law has been allowed regular bail. Though petitioner’s status can be equated with the father- in-law but never with Nanad. Husband has been, no doubt, allowed bail but regular considering his custody. Taking that into consideration allowing the petitioner on anticipatory bail is not justified. Accordingly, this petition for anticipatory bail is rejected. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )