$iNi§L§$§§4 €w v \oo L/ c, g C ‘2) IN THE HFGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUWCHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) NOEC‘IO /2008 /‘ Hemchond 3am, 3/0 Shri H.L, 30m, aged obouT 2O years, R/o Kasekerq, P PETtTlON ER O. — Akalwara, Tohsx’l — Chhura, ‘ District Roipur (CG) VERSUS The Sfon‘e of ChhQHisgQrh Through The Secrefory, PQhChQyOT Department D.K.S. Bhawoh, Manfralaya Rai'pur TOG.) The Chief Execufive Officer, District DiSTh'CT' — Ponchoyaf, Raipur, Raipur TOG.) The C0llecior, Raipur, Disfrid — Roipur (CG) The JOhpOd Pahchoym, Devbhog‘ Through: The Presidem‘, Jahpod evbhog, DisTricT Panchoygto,’ Rdipur Toe.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 2265/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. D (“gQ/ HIGHVCOURT OF CHI-IA’IVI‘ISGARH : BILASPUR Writ PEtih'on (SE N0. 5010 of2008 Hemchand Sahu Versus Petitioner Respondents This State of Chhatujsgarh & others (Writ Petition under Alticle 226/ 227 of the Constitution of Indié) (SB: Hon’ble Shrj Satish K. Agnihotm' J.) S. C. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. A puty Advocate General for the Shri Shm’ Yashwant Singh Thakur, De respondents No. l and 3. N ORDER oral ( Passed on this 27th day of October, 2009 ) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submts that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to pursue the representation, pending before the respondent/authority. Learned counsel appealing for the respondents/State has no objection. In View of the foregoing the writ petition is dismissed Withdrawn with the aboveastated liberty, if so advised. No order asto costs. / I él- EIS ii Agniwm I Satjs" J“ége L