IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-8482 of 2010 Date of Decision: November 18, 2011 Ranjit Singh Sekhon & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. V.S. Rana, Advocate, for Mr. Gulzar Mohammad, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Ms. Kuldeep K. Ghumman, Advocate, for respondent No.2. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. The petition challenges a complaint filed by respondent No.2. Complaint has been dismissed in view of the settlement between the petitioners and respondent No.2-complainant. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that in view of the above facts, this petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Disposed of as infructuous in view of statement of learned counsel for the petitioners. (AJAI LAMBA) November 18, 2011 JUDGE avin Crl. Misc. No. M-7402 of 2011 [2] 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?