IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.175 OF 2003 Kamlakar Kashinath Vaity ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ...... None for Petitioner. Mr.A.P.Vanarse, A.G.P. for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. APRIL 24, 2006. APRIL 24, 2006. APRIL 24, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. None for the Petitioner. 2. The grievance in this Petition is about breach of direction contained in order dated June 23, 2000 passed by the Division Bench of our High Court. The direction was to the Special Land Acquisition Officer to fix the ground rent for the relevant period in accordance with the established norms and make payment within three months from : 2 : that date. The present Petition, however, has been filed on 9th April 2002. Three months from 23rd June 2000 would expire on 23rd September 2000, on which date, limitation for filing present contempt action would commence. 3. As the present Petition has been filed after expiry of one year from the commencement of cause of action, the same is barred by limitation. Hence, dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.