1 cp215.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.215 OF 2009 Ramesh Golani ...Petitioner vs. Vinod Lalsingh Thakur ...Respondent Mr.S.S.Ianamdar i/b Mr.Niranjan Shimpi for the petitioner Ms Suniya Miskin for the respondent CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE :DECEMBER 23,2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioner invited the attention of the Court to clause (7) of the order dated 14th December 2007 passed by this Court in the earlier writ petition. The said clause (7) reads thus : 7 After taking instructions, Mr.Kumbhakoni makes a statement that the second respondent applied for regularisation, paid the compounding fees and the subject structure has been regularised. Since the compounding fees are now paid, formal orders are now awaited, but the Corporation in particular has approved the proposal for regularisation. 2 It is contended on the basis of the notice dated 6th February 2009 issued by the Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation that statement recorded in clause (7) of this order was false. 3 There is a reply filed by the respondent which 2 cp215.sxw discloses that various amounts were deposited with the Municipal Corporation in the year 2007-2008 totally amounting to Rs.4,02,872/-. In the reply reliance has been placed on letter dated 6th July 2009 issued by the Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation which acknowledges the payment of aforesaid amount. 4 In view of the statements made in the reply and documents annexed therewith, no case is made out to initiate action under the Contempt of Courts Act,1971. Petition is disposed of. JUDGE