IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7661 of 2011 AJAY SHARMA @ MAMU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 18.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The petitioner renews his prayer for anticipatory bail in a police case for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted that on the earlier occasion noticing that co- accused had been granted anticipatory bail till submission of charge sheet, his prayer was also rejected assuming that charge sheet had been submitted. The report at flag ‘A’ has been perused. In order to maintain parity in orders, charge sheet not having been submitted against him till now, let the petitioner surrender within a period of three weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20, 000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate Gaya in connection with Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 153 of 2006. The petitioner has not placed the order of Cr. Misc. No. 52370 of 2006 with regard to the other co-accused. If there were any conditions imposed while granting anticipatory bail to the co-accused the same shall apply mutatis mutandis to the petitioner. The application is disposed. Prakash ( Navin Sinha, J.)