IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5127 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 08.09.2009 Amarjit Singh .....Petitioner versus Harjinder Singh and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.P.S.Khurana, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-tenant is in revision petition against the order dated 12.8.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Ludhiana, whereby he has been asked to tender the arrears of rent @ Rs.75,000/- per month w.e.f. June, 2008, besides interest and costs and Rs.15,000/- towards water charges. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered view that no interference with the impugned order dated 12.8.2009 is called for by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner is required to deposit an amount of Rs.13,00,000/-, he may C.R. No.5127 of 2009 (O&M) 2 be granted some reasonable period to tender the arrears of rent. Taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances, it is directed that subject to the petitioner depositing a sum of Rs.9 lacs on the date fixed i.e. 11.9.2009, he may tender the balance arrears of rent on or before 20.10.2009 but that will include the rent for the month of October, 2009 as well. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. Dasti. 08-09-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE