IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2954 of 2010 DINESH PASWAN son of Bhikhari Paswan, resident of vill.-Chauhaniya, P.S.-Madhuban District-East Champaran _----------Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------------ 2. 17.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is one of the five named accused persons but co-accused Sogarath Rai, only who is shown apprehended with a tin containing 15 litres of mustard oil, is allowed bail and from petitioner’s possession there was no recovery. There was enmity in between both the parties and that is the reason only for false implication which never can be justified for refusal of anticipatory bail. I agree with the submission. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of communication of this order the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Sikrahna, at Motihari, in connection with Madhuban P.S. case no.12 of 2009 , subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J. )