1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 216 OF 2010 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 287 OF 2010 M/s.Beepee Enterprises ... Appellant v/s Prakashchand Mukesh Kumar Jain ... Respondent Mr.S.U.Kamdar with Mr.Vivek Kantawala and Ms.Sneha Nanandkar i/by Vivek Kantawala & Co. for the appellant. Ms.Yasmin E. Tavaria with Dinesh A. Barot for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 9TH MARCH, 2010 P.C.: 1. The grievance of the appellant is that the Trial Court has not framed a preliminary issue regarding the jurisdiction of the City Civil Court to entertain and try the suit. It is submitted on behalf of the appellant that in para 3(a) of the reply to the motion, the appellant had raised the question of jurisdiction. In my view, the pleadings leave much to be desired. There is no specific contention that the City Civil 2 Court has no jurisdiction to deal with the matter. 2. In case the appellants file an application/motion before the Trial Court for framing a preliminary issue with respect to the jurisdiction under Section 9A of the Code of Civil Procedure, that will be decided on merits by the Trial Court as expeditiously as possible. Till then the impugned order will be treated as an ad-interim order. 3. Appeal from order disposed of accordingly along with the civil application. ..... 3