THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO :20402 of 2011 Dated: 24.10.2011 Between: 1. Kondapalli Ramu and another. ..Petitioners And 1. Sriram City Union Finance Limited rep., by its Zonal Secretary, Vijayawada and another. ..Respondents This Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD W.P.No.20402 of 2011 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana) This writ petition is filed seeking to quash the order, dated 29.3.2011 in R.P.No.9 of 2011 on the file of the A.P. State Consumer Redressal Commission against the orders in I.A.No.8 of 2011 in C.C.No.7 of 2011 of the District Forum II of Vijayawada, Krishna District. The brief facts of the case are as follows: The petitioners availed loan over two motor cabs from the respondent. On 28.12.2010, the respondent-financier seized Tata Innova vehicle without any notice. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners filed C.C.No.7 of 2011 before the District Consumer Forum II, Vijayawada along with I.A.No.8 of 2011. The District Consumer Forum passed interim orders in I.A.No.8 of 2011 directing the 2nd respondent to return the seized vehicle to the petitioners on condition of receiving the amount of two instalments from them. In pursuance of the directions of the District Consumer Forum, though the petitioners offered the amount of two instalments, the respondents refused to receive the same. On that, the petitioners made payment by way of D.D. and deposited the same in the Court. While so, the respondents herein filed R.P.No.9 of 2011 before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission against the orders in I.A.No.8 of 2011 in C.C.No.7 of 2011. The State Commission allowed the revision setting aside the order in I.A.No.8 of 2011 and directing the District Forum to restore I.A.No.8 of 2011 to its file. The State Commission further directed the respondents to file counter before the District Forum and directed both the parties to appear before the District Forum, without insisting for fresh notice, on 11.4.2011 and also directed the District Forum to dispose of the matter on merits after giving opportunity to both sides uninfluenced by any of the observations made in Revision Petition. Challenging the same, the petitioners filed this writ petition. When this matter was taken up, the learned Counsel for the respondents brought to the notice of this Court that the District Consumer Forum has already disposed of I.A.No.8 of 2011 in C.C.No.7 of 2011 on 10.8.2011 as per the directions of the State Consumer Redressal Commission. In view of the above submission, we feel that no orders need be passed in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________ Justice N.V. Ramana DATE: 24.10.2011 ____________________ Justice P. Durga Prasad nn THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD W.P.No.20402 of 2011 (Order delivered by the Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana) 24.10.2011 Nn