I-, lN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM OF3DEF3 SHEET ..,....W€1t..I.e.tltlan(C} ..............,.......... N9.3* of 200 6 Ram..roar. Pet.froner / Appellant Versus I....G±,.I.1ngey..ahu€,|a.Ge..ors.......F`espondent Order with Signature Office Note as to action (if any) taken on Order 11 -8-20 These six cases nainely (i) Writ Petition No.28/2006, (ii) Writ Petition No.29/2006, (iii) Writ Petition No.30/2006, (iv) Writ Petition No.31/2006, (v) Writ Petition No.32/2006 and Writ Petition No.33/2006 are taken up today jointly for admission as the same` involve same and similar common questions of Law and the facts. Upon heal.ing Mi.. S. Majumdar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner at some length, in his usual frankness, he submitted tliat the Petitioners desire to withdraw these Petitions with liberty to approach the learned single Judge of this Court in the matter in connection with R.F.A. Nos. I to 6 of 2006. Considering the prayer of the learned Counsel, wc allow the Petitioners to withdraw these Petitions with liberty to approach the lcai.ned single Judge in the re`lated mattci.s. Tlic cases are closed on A withdrawal. .i.^tLJ (N. Surjainani Singh) Act`n(;:EL Judge