CRLR No. 104 of 2011 with CRMA No. 530 of 2011 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Shri Neeraj Garg, Advocate, present for the revisionist. Heard. Revisionist has challenged the order dated 07.04.2011, passed by Judge Family Court, Udham Singh Nagar, in Criminal Case No. 71 of 2007, whereby said court has directed the revisionist to pay maintenance to his wife at the rate of ` 2,500/- per month and ` 1,500/- per month to his minor daughter. Learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that income of the revisionist is only 2,000/- per month. However the trial court has mentioned that from the income tax return filed for the assessment year 2006-2007, the revisionist has shown in income ` 80,000/- per annum. The trial court has assessed the income of the revisionist as not less than ` 8,000/- per month in the year 2011. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the revisionist and after going through the impugned order, this court does not find any illegality in the impugned order which requires interference of this court. Therefore, the revision is dismissed summarily. (Stay Application No. 530 of 2011 also stands dismissed). (P.C.P., J.) 23-05-2011 NP