THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5752 of 2010 ORDER : 1. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the docket order dated 8.11.2010 passed in Memo SR No.4777/2010 in I.A. No.374 of 2010 in O.S. No.206 of 2005 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry, 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 3. On the application filed by the petitioners/defendants, the trial Court appointed an Advocate Commissioner. It is evident from the record that, inspite of giving several opportunities, the parties have not co-operated with the earlier advocate commissioner to enable him to execute the warrant. Disgusted by the same, the advocate commissioner returned the warrant unexecuted. Thereafter, the petitioners filed the memo on 3.11.2010 to entrust the warrant to another Advocate Commissioner. 4. Evidence on both sides was closed in the suit and it is posted for arguments. The petitioners kept quiet for 2 ½ months after return of warrant, and thereafter filed the present memo. From the impugned order, it is clear that the parties are adopting delaying tactics so as to drag on the matter. Since the suit is an identified case, they should have co-operated with the court for disposal. Instead of co-operating for disposal of the case, they resorted to file petition after petition. Hence, the trial Court rightly rejected the memo, and there are no grounds to interfere with the impugned order. 5. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merit and is, accordingly, dismissed at the admission stage. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 15.12.2010 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5752 of 2010 15.12.2010 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5752 of 2010 15.12.2010 Between: Pulla Rama Rao & others …Petitioners And Kumarapudi Uma Maheswari …Respondent