HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 10th May, 2006 Bail Application No. 384 of 2006 Order on the Bail application of the accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Wajid S/o Sri Dalel R/o Singhawli Police Station Kankarkheda District –Meerut …..….Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal …….Opposite Party _______________________________________________________ In Case Crime No. 129 of 2006 U/s 379, 411, 414, 34 I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali District- Haridwar _______________________________________________________ Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat,J. Heard Sri Pankaj Miglani-learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. It is revealed from the record as pointed out by Shri R.S. Rautela, learned A.G.A. that the accused-applicant was arrested on 22.02.2006 and thereafter warrant-B was sent on 28.02.2006 and the accused was brought to Uttaranchal on 10.03.2006. Meanwhile, the bail application was moved u/s 41 / 102 Cr.P.C. and u/s 411, 414 I.P.C. The arrest was made by the police on the ground that the stolen property was recovered from the possession of the accused- applicant. Till that time the police sent the warrant-B on 28.02.2006 and it was connected with case Crime No. 129 of 2006. The bail application was heard by the Allahabad High Court and the Allahabad High Court enlarged the accused-applicant on bail. I do not find any ground as to why the accused- applicant has been detained in the jail. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case in totality, it is a fit case for bail at this stage. Let the accused-applicant, Wajid be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M. concerned. (J.C.S.Rawat,J.) Dated 10.05.2006 Shiv