IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.472 of 2008 UMA SHANKAR PRASAD & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 11.2.2009 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners to pray for time to remove the defect. As appears from the office note, the related LPA No.603 of 2005 was dismissed by another order and has already been restored and admitted for hearing. On going through the records of LPA, we do not find any order of dismissal passed on 27.5.2007 by the Bench named in paragraph 4 of this restoration application. In fact, the LPA was dismissed on 21.5.2007 by another Bench and has already been restored. This restoration application is clearly misconceived and infructuous as the LPA has already been restored and admitted. This MJC application is, therefore, dismissed as such. A perusal of the order-sheet in this case shows that order no.3 is without date and has not been signed by the Registrar General but instead of getting those defects removed, the office has processed and put up this case 2 before the Bench. This shows obvious negligence and carelessness on the part of the concerned officials. The Registrar General is directed to look into the matter and take appropriate steps. (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (J.N.Singh,J.) sk