1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.871 OF 2011 1. Sachin Tukaram Patil .Applicants 2. Tukaram Shripati Patil V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.Prashant Bhavake, Advocate, for the Applicants Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 15TH NOVEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail by husband and father-in-law of the victim, who apprehend arrest in connection with C.R.No. 63 of 2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 304(B), 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Radhanagari Police Station, Radhanagari, 2 District Kolhapur. Victim committed suicide by setting herself on fire on 27th June, 2010. In the first dying declaration, she had stated that she caught fire accidently. In the second dying declaration, she attributes the quarrel with her mother-in-law Shalabai as the reason for setting herself on fire. Shalabai was arrested and has been bailed out by this Court after being in custody for two months by order dated 7th September, 2011. In none of the dying declarations, there is any mention about the ill treatment at the hands of the applicants. 3. In view of this, in the event of arrest, applicants be released on bail on their furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.25,000/- each with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.25,000/- on the following conditions. (i) The applicants shall report at the Radhanagari Police Station, Radhanagari, District Kolhapur on 28th November, 2011 in between 10.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. and thereafter, as and when required by the investigating officer. 3 (ii) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. (iii) The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iv) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. 4. Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of. . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court dated 2nd December, 2010 delivered in Special Leave Petition (Cri.) No.7615 of 2009 (Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State of Maharashtra And Ors.). (R.C.CHAVAN, J.) 4