1 wp10116.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10116 OF 2010 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. V.B. Patil, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.J. Ghute, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr. A.S. Sawant, Advocate for respondent no.4. Heard Advocate Patil for the petitioners, Advocate Shri Sawant for respondent no.4 and Learned A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 to 3. 2. Learned Counsel for petitioners is seeking leave to place rejoinder on record, however, Shri Sawant Advocate for respondent no.4 opposes taking of rejoinder on record. I find that no case for filing rejoinder on record is made out. 3. In view of this, I heard the respective Counsel of the parties. Mr. Patil is trying to demonstrate some inconsistency in the dates of report of enquiry prepared allegedly under Section 88 of M.C.S. Act. Appeal and 2 wp10116.10 Stay application is preferred against the same by petitioner before the Divisional Joint Registrar and the Divisional Joint Registrar has issued notice only and the prayer for interim relief is still pending. I am not inclined to observe anything on merit as the position prevailing on 18.10.2010 continues as it is. 4. In this situation, the interest of justice would be served by directing the Divisional Joint Registrar to decide the prayer for stay as early as possible and in any case within a period of four weeks from today. Till the Divisional Joint Registrar decide that prayer, the status- quo as on today shall be maintained by the parties. 5. With these directions, all contentions are kept open for consideration of the Divisional Joint Registrar. Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 06.01.2011 gas/wp10116.10