1 ca934.08 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 934 OF 2008 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 24101 OF 2007 [Pradipkumar Sharnappa Matange vs. Trimbak Rangnath Kadam/Murme & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. B.R. Sontakke Patil, Advocate for applicant. Mr. M.D. Shinde, Advocate for respondents. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 9TH NOVEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned Counsel appearing for the applicant and learned Counsel for the respondents. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that, delay has not been properly explained. However, on perusal of the contents of the application 2 ca934.08 and in particular para-2, delay has been properly explained. Delay stands condoned. 3. Civil Application for condonation of delay is allowed and stands disposed of. . Second Appeal to be placed for admission on 30-11-2011. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/NOV11