IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 30TH MARCH 2007 / 9TH CHAITHRA 1929 WP(C).No. 28577 of 2004(B) PETITIONER: SHIJU.K.GEORGE, S/O.K.X.GEORGE, KURISUNKAL HOUSE, THAICKAL P.O., OTTAMASSERY, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.VAKKOM N.VIJAYAN SMT.VINITHA PRASANNAN SRI.P.ANIYAN SMT.RAGAM.K.P. SMT.REENA.C.STEPHENSON RESPONDENTS: 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OFFICE, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.T.B.REMANY SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 28577 of 2004 (B) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: Ext.P1: True copy of the notice with the Caption “for the special attention of the candidates” Ext.P2: True copy of the application submitted by the petitioner dated 28.1.2003 for the post of Tracer/Overseer Grade III. Ext.P3: True copy of the admission ticket from the 3rd respondent to the petitioner. Ext.P4: True copy of the certificate dated 5.12.2002 issued by the office of the Commandant, KAP I Bn. RV Puram, Thrissur. Ext.P5: True copy of the certificate dated 29.5.2003 issued by the Office of the Commandant, KAP I Bn, RV puram, Thrissur. // True copy // P.A. to Judge KURIAN JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)NO.28577 OF 2004 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 30th day of March 2007 JUDGMENT Prayer is for a direction to permit the petitioner also to participate in the interview for the post of Tracer/Overseer Grade-III in the Kerala Water Authority. The interview has already been conducted. The learned counsel appearing for the Commission submits that the petitioner had wrongly sent the application to two district offices of the Commission and hence the application could not be included in the selection process. The conduct of the petitioner being in violation of the instructions, the petitioner is not entitled to any relief. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE jes