IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25025 of 2009 1. MAHANGU SHARMA 2. NATHU SHARMA 3. BHUSIYA DEVI 4. LAKHISER SHARMA 5. BUSHRA SHARMA 6. PUSPA KUMARI Versus STATE OF BIAHR ----------- 2. 26.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners, who are the husband and his family members, apprehend arrest in a complaint case under Sections 498 A of the Penal Code and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The submission on behalf of petitioners 2 to 6 is of generalized allegations. The submission on behalf of the husband, petitioner no. 1 is that both he and the complainant have subsequently solemnized a second marriage respectively. Let petitioners 2 to 6, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Katihar in Complaint Case CA 546 of 2008. Let petitioner no. 1, abovenamed surrender in the court below within like period when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail for a period of six months only on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Katihar in Complaint case No. CA 546 of 2008. The court below shall ascertain the correctness of the submission made that even the complainant had married subsequently and thereafter any regular bail on behalf of petitioner no. 1 shall be decided preferably on the day that he physically appears without being prejudiced by the present order. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)