1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 3118 of 2009 Diwakar v. State of Maharashtra ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr Anil Mardikar, Adv for applicant Mr D.P. Thakare, APP for State Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 29th September 2009 1. Heard learned counsel for parties. Interim anticipatory bail was granted on 25th August 2009 subject to certain conditions. By filing reply, learned Additional Public Prosecutor objected grant of anticipatory bail on the ground that the documents are fabricated. He submits that though 107 works were distributed in the meeting dated 3.1.2009, the present applicant by including 62 works in the above list and thereby committed forgery. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that all documents in respect of which fabrication is alleged are in custody of Investigating Officer and applicant has cooperated with the investigation after grant of anticipatory bail. It is contended that if the works would have been illegal or without authority, then no sanction for the same would have been granted and payment would not have been released. 2 3. After taking into consideration the rival submissions, I think interim anticipatory bail granted to applicant needs to be confirmed. Hence, interim anticipatory bail granted on 25th August 2009 is hereby confirmed subject to same terms and conditions until charge-sheet is filed. Application is disposed of. Judge. hsj