HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY And HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.918 of 2009 IN CMAMP No.1873 of 2007 IN C.M.A.No.770 of 2007 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) This contempt case is filed by the petitioner-appellant alleging violation of the interim orders passed by this Court in C.M.A.M.P.1873 of 2007 in C.M.A.770 of 2007 dated 03.12.2007 whereby we have directed the first respondent herein to deposit the family pension and other retirement benefits received on the death of the parents of the minor Chy. Ramya, in any branches of State Bank of India at Rajahmundry, in the name of minor Ramya Puchakayala. Subsequent to the said orders, this Court by order dated 31.07.2008 in C.M.P.No.1177 of 2008 and CMP No.1813 of 2007 directed the respondents 2 and 3, i.e., the Joint Director, E.S.I. Medical Services, Gunadala, Vijayawada, Krishna District and the Civil Assistant Surgeon, E.S.I.Dispensary town, Governorpet, Vijayawada, Krishna District to deposit the terminal and other benefits of father Sri (Late) P. Ramana Murthy and mother Smt.(Late) P.Sarada Devi, parents of the minor Chy.Ramya Puchakayala into her account at State Bank of India, Kambala Tank Branch, Rajahmundry. In C.M.A.M.P.No.2565 of 2008 by an interim order dated 10.12.2008, this Court permitted the first respondent in the appeal C.M.A.770 of 2007, who was appointed as a guardian of minor to withdraw the amount as prayed for in the application for the month of December 2008 only. Since an objection was raised having regard to the use of the amount withdrawn by the respondent for any other purpose, he was directed to file the accounts, in respect of the amounts received, in the Court below, including the amount of Rs.6,000/- and the Court below was directed to consider the objection raised by the respondent/petitioner herein and submit a report to this Court. Pursuant to the direction issued by this Court, the respondent-contemnor filed a detailed statement of accounts before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, East Godavari District, for the amounts spent by him on the minor girl, since she was suffering from HIV positive. 2. Before ordering notice in the contempt case, the appeal filed by the petitioner herein has been allowed on 23.07.2009 setting aside the order passed in O.P.No.198 of 2007 dated 10.08.2007 and the matter was remitted to the lower Court for adjudication after impleading the petitioner as a party respondent in the guardian O.P. with a direction to the lower Court to dispose of the matter expeditiously, by permitting the parties to move an application seeking any interim relief, if they are so advised. 3. In view of the same, we see no merits in the contentions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents herein have deliberately violated the interim order passed by this Court, since the same has been considered and approved by this Court by order dated 10.12.2008 passed in C.M.P.No.2565 of 2008. 4. The Contempt Case is accordingly dismissed. Parties are at liberty to approach the lower Court for appropriate reliefs. __________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J _________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO,J 11th September 2009 Rns