IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7096 of 2010 BILASH MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.8003 of 2010 1. NITISH MAHTO 2. Binod Mahto ………………. Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09.03.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioners in a Police case in which chargesheet has been submitted under Sections 304/34 of the Penal Code is that the informant is not an eye witness, there is no source of information disclosed in the First Information Report why the petitioners are being named and it is highly unlikely that any villagers were wandering at the river site late night to witness the occurrence. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM Hilsa (Nalanda) in Chandi PS Case No. 246 of 2009. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)