IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38900 of 2010 1.SUJEET YADAV son of Upendra Yadav 2.Saheb Yadav son of Chhatthu Yadav, Both resident of village-Chukti, P.S.- Mansi, District- Khagaria Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 22.2.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The two petitioners, who are in custody in connection with Khagaria (Mansi) Rail P.S. Case No.60 of 2009 for the offences under sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, have prayed for grant of bail. It was submitted that co-accused Ram Pukar Singh almost on similar situation has been granted bail by this court on 22.4.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No.5984 of 2010. It was further submitted that the petitioners were not put on T.I.parade and only on suspicion they have been made accused. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. It was submitted that so far as petitioner no.1 is concerned he is accused in about three cases. However, learned Additional Public Prosecutor is not disputing that petitioner no.2 is having clean antecedent since same statement has been made in paragraph-13 of the bail petition. Keeping in view the fact particularly antecedent of petitioner no.1, prayer for bail of petitioner no.1 stands rejected. So far as petitioner no.2 is concerned, it appears that he was having clean antecedent and, as such, petitioner no.2, 2 namely, Saheb Yadav is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Ist, Khagaria in connection with Khagarai (Mansi) Rail P.S. Case No.60 of 2009, S.C. No.245 of 2010. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)