IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 29TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 5336 of 2009(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ T.RAVEENDRAN, PULIKOTTE HOUSE, P.O.IYYAD, UNNIKKULAM, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE. 2. SRI.A.C.BABURAJ, KOVLI HOUSE, CEHTTIKULAM, KOZHIKODE. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 5336 OF 2009 (J) ==================== Dated this the 18th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is primarily aggrieved by Ext.P3, where timings have been issued to the 2nd respondent subject to revision, if found necessary. It is stated that Ext.P3 reflects only tentative timings and that thereafter on two occassions, timing conference was scheduled, but was not held. 2. It is stated that aggrieved by Ext.P3, petitioner has also filed Ext.P4 objections. In this writ petition all that he seeks is that the timing conference which was scheduled subsequent to Ext.P3 should be held, and that taking into account Ext.P4 objections also, the timings of the 2nd respondent should be settled. 3. If as stated by the petitioner, timing conference has been scheduled after Ext.P3, necessarily, the respondents shall convene the same and settle the timings taking into account Ext.P4 also. 4. Therefore, I direct the 1st respondent to settle the timings as mentioned above. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp