WP(C) 5109/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA. Heard Mr. M.H. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms P. Ch akraborty, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department. The petitioner is aggrieved by appointment of the Respondent No.4 as Anganwadi W orker for the centre called Pachim Salmara Anganabadi Centre. According to the p etitioner, she was not called for the interview, although the Respondent No.4 of the said locality was called for interview. Eventually, the Respondent No.4 was appointed. In the counter affidavit filed by the Respondent No.3, it has been stated that t he petitioner is not a resident of the area covered by the Anganwadi Centre. But on the other hand, the Respondent No.4 is a resident of the said area. In the r eply affidavit, the petitioner has denied the said contention and has stated tha t the particular certificate granted by the Gaon Burah is not a valid one. The w rit petition involves the disputed question of fact relating to residential stat us of the parties and the writ Court cannot make a roving enquiry to decide on s uch status. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate her grievance by making a representation before the Direc tor of Social Welfare, Assam. In the event of making such representation, the Di rector shall dispose of the same in accordance with law after hearing all the pa rties.