IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER TUESDAY, THE 6TH MAY 2008 / 16TH VAISAKHA 1930 WP(C).No. 14207 of 2008(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ REMA BAI, W/O.LATE KOCHU KRISHNA PILLAI GOPAKUMAR, JANAKI NILAYAM, THAZHAM, CHATHANNOOR, MEENAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.SIVARAJ RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. THANKAPPAN, S/O.NEELAKANDAN, KOCHU PATTATHIL VEEDU, THAZHAM, CHATHANNOOR, MEENAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 4. BIJU, S/O.THANKAPPAN, KOCHU PATTATHIL VEEDU, THAZHAM, CHATHANNOOR, MEENAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 5. BINU, S/O.THANKAPPAN, KOCHU PATTATHIL VEEDU, THAZHAM, CHATHANNOOR, MEENAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: A.K. Basheer & V. Giri, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P (C) No. 14207 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 6th day of May, 2008. Judgment Basheer, J: Petitioner who is a widow apprehends danger to her life at the hands of respondents 3 to 6. It is seen from the materials available on record that this Court had issued an order of injunction restraining respondent No.3 and his men from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and plucking coconuts therefrom. It is the admitted position that the Second Appeal preferred by respondent No.3 is pending consideration before this Court. Learned counsel points out that the suit filed by respondent No.3 was dismissed by the trial court and the said judgment and decree were confirmed by the appellate court. It is against the judgment and decree of the appellate court that respondent No.3 has preferred the second appeal. 2. Petitioner has preferred Ext.P6 representation before respondent No.2 requesting him to take appropriate action against respondents 3 to 5. In Ext.P7 complaint also petitioner had requested respondent No.2 to afford adequate protection to her life. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the materials available on record, we are satisfied that the writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to take appropriate action on Exts.P6 and P7 and afford protection to WP(C).14207/2008. 2 the life of the petitioner. Ordered accordingly. Writ Petition is closed. A.K. Basheer Judge. V. Giri, Judge. an.