SlllGlC 8^€B V, c^i^z— PETITIONER : RESPONDENTS : €^^ »&•• y &®1Ael IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0. '-j&B^ OF 2009 •Biharilal Sahu, S/o Lambodar Prasad Sahu, aged about 59 years, presently posted and working as Principal, Government K.M.T. Girls College, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretaiy, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, (CG). 2. Principal Secretaiy, Department of Higher Education, Government of CG, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, (CG). 3. Joint Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). -4. Commissioner, Deptt. of Higher Education, Directorate, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). WRIT^ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ....•..,^ "y fflG^H COURT QF CHttiA'mSOAKH AT BtLASPUR pE'rmoNER WRTF PETmON <S} No. 4883 of20(» Biharilal Satou. RESPONDENTS VERSUS Stete ofaihattie^A & Others. WHII PETrUON UNDEM. AK11CL& ^6 OP THE CUlMSTH'unON Oy BOXA SB^Hon'Me ShriSattoh K. AenihotoLJ, Amit Present: Siu-i B.D.Oiuu, Advoeate forthe petiti<Miff-. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerfortfae State/reqicndente. QMUKKrt.iUKAl.) (Passed on 27al day <rfJane, 2011) 1. Leamed eounsel appearing fcs the State/isspondents submits that tte petitioner has already c<mtinued at the origjaal plaee ofpoaiing Sx almost 1 vear and 10 montlis on account of mterim arder granted by tUs Court 31.08.2009. The State/respondents may be granted liberty to pass ^(propriate ardws keepmg in view publw interest and admuristrativeexigency. Shri Bhaduri turtfaer suhmits tfaat the State/respondents shall not msist upon oompliance ofthe impugned order dated and 30.06.2009 (Annesawe P/l-A) mrespect ofthe petitioaer. 2. At ttus stage, when no effect could be avea to the impugned order 30.06.2009 (Annexure P/l-A) onaccouHt of the uiterim ordcr dated 31.08.2009, thus, it is not necessary to go into legality and validity ofthe aforestated impugned wders. 3. In view of tfae above, according to leanwl counsel appeariag Saf the petitioner, nofhing survives in fhis petition fiw adjudisatitwi. 4. Accardn^ly, fhe petition stands disposed o£No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge