IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41962 of 2009 ASHOK MAHTO & ANR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . 3 5.4.2010 KHAN Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case under section 498(A) of the Penal Code. The petitioner no.1 is the husband and petitioner no.2 is mother-in-law of the complainant. The complaint was filed in the year 2003. Learned counsel for the petitioners files a supplementary affidavit stating therein that the complainant Malo Devi has re- married with one Dinesh Mahto son of Bhannu Mahto, resident of Mabbi, District Darbhanga. He submits that even from the complaint case, it would appear that the demand was for Rs.5,000/- only. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners Ashok Mahto and Ram Dular Devi are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest/surrender, in connection with C.R.No.21 of 2003, G.R.No.779 of 2009 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani. However, in case it transpires that the submission of the petitioner that the complainant has re-married is false, it would be open for the Magistrate, in seisin of the case, to cancel the bail bond of petitioner no.1 Ashok Mahto. (S.P.Singh,J) - 2 -