RSA No.4457 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.4457 of 2009(O & M) Date of Decision:12.08.2010 Ram Lakhan .... appellant Versus Ram Partap .....respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Vivek Goyal,Advocate for the appellant Mr.Sanjeev Rai, Advocate for the respondent **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J.(ORAL): CM No.13353-C of 2009 Reply to the application for condonation of delay filed in the Court, is taken on record. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, delay of 54 days in filing this appeal, is condoned. CM disposed of. CM No.13354-C of 2009 For the reasons mentioned, delay of 37 days in re-filing this appeal is condoned. CM disposed of. RSA No.4457 of 2009 This is plaintiff's second appeal challenging the judgment and decrees of the courts below, whereby his suit for recovery of the RSA No.4457 of 2009 2 amount spent by him, to bring up the respondent, who is his son, has been dismissed. As per the averments in the plaint, respondent is the son of the appellant and appellant spent a huge amount on education and bringing up of respondent and provided him all the facilities of life. However, since the respondent was the most disobedient son of the appellant, plaintiff was entitled to the recovery of the amount spent by him. Both the courts below dismissed the suit as the plaintiff failed to produce any evidence on record to prove his case. The aforesaid finding of fact recorded by the courts below could not be disputed before this Court by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant. Thus, I find no merit in this appeal. No substantial question of law arises. Dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 12.08.2010 neenu