1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2416 OF 2008 (Rajiv Laxminarayan Nagulwar .v. Managing Director and another) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 13TH AUGUST, 2008 Heard Shri C.V. Kale, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri R.K. Deshpande, the learned Counsel for the respondents. The writ petition is directed against the order of transfer dated 13.06.2008 whereby the petitioner is transferred from Nagpur to Mumbai. The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner had already worked at Mumbai for 12 years and he was brought to Nagpur only a year ago. It is further contended that the petitioner has not completed the period of three years at Nagpur and, therefore, the impugned order of transfer is bad in law. Shri R.K. Deshpande, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has brought to our notice the Rule 58 of the Employees Service Rules of respondent/Corporation, which reads thus :- 2 “58. Transfers : Services of any employee of the Corporation are liable to be transferred anywhere in or outside the State of Maharashtra. Transfers normally would be done in the months of April to June every year.” Considered the contentions canvassed by the rival parties. Perused the Rule. In the circumstances, no case is made out for any indulgence. Hence the Writ Petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.