IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-3978 of 2009 Date of decision : 11.2.2009. ... Balwinder Singh Saini ................ Petitioner vs. State of Punjab and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Mansur Ali, Advocate for the petitioner. ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied in case his representation Annexure P-14 is ordered to be decided by Inspector General of Police, Jalandhar Range, Jalandhar. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during the course of his service as police officer, he has pointed out various irregularities, which are given in Annexure P-14, and are not being adhered to. So, directions are issued to the Inspector General of Police, Jalandhar Range, Jalandhar to decide the representation of the petitioner Annexure P-14 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The petition stands disposed of. ( K.C. Puri ) 11.2.2009. Judge chug