" \ - T ^yui^p^i ur^is M! ^ii-M3j*'ur^ e' VHHMI UiS'^Mr BLE roNNO,23740FJ806 'ETITIQNERS: • 1. Niranian Bharati S/o Makhan Lal Satnami Aged about 42 years, R/o Village - Dandan, Thana Takhatpur, Tahsii ~ takhatpur, Distt. Silaspur (C.G.) 2. Smt Saatin Bai W/o Makhan satnami Aged about 65 years, R/o Viiiage - Dandan, Thana - Takhatpur, Tahsi! - takhatpur, Distt. — BiiSSpur (C.G.) I. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Agricuiture Departmeni D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Co!!ector, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Deputy Director, Agricu.lture, Biiaspur (C.G.) 4. Sub Di'yisiona! OfRcer (Agricuiture) Takhatpur, Distt. - Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Assistant Project Officer (Sahayak Pariyozana Adhikari) Agricuiture, Takhatpur, Djstt. - Bllaspur (C.G.) 6. Rural Agricultura! Development Expansion Ofiicer (Gramin Krishi ViKas Vjstar Adhikari) Villacse- Dandan, TahsH- TakhaSpur, Distt. iilaspur (C.G.) 'resent: Shri Sanjav Patel, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri Ufkarsh Verma, learned Dy. S.A. for the State. (ORAL ORDER) (Passed on 05 h May, 2008) The grievancs ofthe petit'oners in this writ petition is that undsr the 'dira Khet Ganaa Scheme fKisan Samr'dhi Yozanat floated by the State - -T. Government of Chhattisgarh, they made an application to the Deputy Director, Agricuiture, BiSaspur, the 3 ,-espondenS herein to grant the benent under ths said Scheme, buf, the 6 respondent hsrein dsmanded bribe to grant the benefit. When that was brought to the notice of the Coliector, Bitaspur, ti-ie 2 respondent herein, he Initiatsd dspartmentaS proceedings against the said officer and the officer v/as punished with a pena.'ty of denial of one increment without cumu!ative effect. ^^^^^•.^-^ "i'^'i/^. ?E^.^'*i ^••»-v'C^^^Tl.r a va^ ^1.^1.;'^ .-E^..Jft^ tr~v\v^ •?-i--<p---^. ^^^^ "'/'..•'•* ^rt;.^^.It"t ^^fc."^^1 ^*n ^ ^rS^ ^^ ^^•"^ \f,f^/-^y^ ;^sm^ f^ ^t_in^ G©@0,IH©pQu^iry hT1p'03@Q On IFiS o'" r6!SpoHCi©Hipy ins z"~ rssponc3©ni, i" a bribery case is quite startling, particulariy in visw of ths law iald down by ths Apex Court that !n case of corruption and misappropriation, minimum D9ns!tv 's Bithsr romov^l or disniissai from $©s'\/!c@. Th@ ^•^ ^*.^4a~. t^.^^^ t^-.Vt^ f\/aM^.~T-.'^,:^^~^^y^ 4'-^: f'.^' ^•3,~^ /^ y^.3^.lT/^/3^4»^-'"<-B-^ '^V^.'^: ^ ^: ^•-•^ ^r^/"L -^ ^ ?'.-^^.^'-?iT<i .-^.y^-J^J^?r^J^ ?^* U~S s©idiOH©rscGmpiSiH snsi nis sppiicsiion niisei®so i;n©w ~ r©spouQ©riiis ri' yst disposed of by the 3 respondent. (2) Having heard learned counset for ths parties, ! dispose of the writ pstition directing ths 3 rsspondent to consider and dispose ofth®above applicatlon of the petitioners made under Indira Khet Ganga Scheme (Kisan Samridhi Yozana), If not already done, withln a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Riihhi) Sd/- Chief Justice