IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8478 of 2007 Between: Ch. Pardasaradhi, S./o. Venkata Subba Rao, Hindu, R/o. D.No. 57-8-21, Patamata, Vijayawada - 10. ..... PETITIONER AND The Vijaywada Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Assistant Commissioner, Circle-III, Bobba Venkateswara Rao Complex, Vijayawada -10. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the endorsement bearing No. L.dis.A11- 71606/07 dated 27-1-2007 issued by the respondent as arbitrary, illegal, capricious and contrary to the provisions of the Registration Act and provisions of Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act and consequently set-aside the same and pass such other orders as may be deem ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR M.R.L.NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent.: SMT.G.JHANSI, Standing Counsel. The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition has been ﬁled by Ch.Pardasaradhi with a prayer to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the endorsement bearing No.L.Dis.A11-71606/07, dated 27.01.2007 issued by the respondent as arbitrary and illegal. 2. When the writ petition came up for admission hearing, Smt.G.Jhansi, learned Standing Counsel of the Vijayawada Municipal Corporation received notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. Counter-aﬃdavit has been ﬁled by the respondent. It is stated in the counter-aﬃdavit that the respondent-Corporation issued proceedings on 29.05.2007 duly mutating the name of the petitioner. 4. Since mutation has been eﬀected in favour of the petitioner, nothing survives in this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:03rd November, 2008. cs ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}