IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 29591 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: November 15, 2010. Amit ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Y.D.Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh, A.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.192 dated 13.08.2010, under Sections 323/506/285/307/34 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Sadar Ballabgarh, District Faridabad. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 12.10.2010 passed the following order:- CRM No.M-29591 of 2010 “Contends that it is a case of no injury. Further contends that there is no allegation of shooting with fire-arm against the present petitioner and that only allegation against the co-accused is that he fired in the air. Notice of motion for 15.11.2010. However, petitioner is directed to join the investigation and in case he is arrested, he shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has already joined the investigation pursuant to said order dated 12.10.2010. It has also been stated by learned counsel for the State that petitioner has joined the investigation and that he is no more required for any custodial interrogation. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of Amit is accepted and order dated 12.10.2010 granting interim bail in favour of the petitioner is, hereby, made absolute subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) November 15, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2