1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.647 OF 2009 Saquib Abdul Hamid Nachan .. Appellant V/s State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.Mobin Solkar for the Appellant.. Smt.A.S.Pai, APP for the State. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 6TH JANUARY, 2010 P.C. : 1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant through jail. Learned Advocate Mr.Mobin Solkar is appointed as Amicus Curie to assist the Court. The impugned order in our view is purely interlocutory in nature. The appellant submitted application before the learned Judge of the POTA Court seeking direction to the Investigating Officer to return certain papers and documents which were taken by him from his possession during the course of investigation. In the application submitted before the POTA Court the appellant submitted that during the course of investigation certain documents were seized from him which were in connection with land record such as 7/12 extract, maps etc. The said documents were in connection with the property of the appellant and his family members. After hearing both sides, learned Judge of the POTA 2 Court came to the conclusion that the application gives no details of the documents belonging to him which were to be returned by the Investigating Officer and the averments nade were very vague. The said application was accordingly rejected. 2. In our view the order in question is purely interlocutory in nature and not appealable u/s.34 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002. As per the earlier order of this Court dated December 5, 2009 report has been submitted by the Registrar (Sessions), City Civil & Sessions Court, Greater Mumbai alongwith certain documents which are already forwarded to this Court. The order in question is purely interlocutory in nature and it is not necessary to examine further aspects as to whether application submitted by the accused was vague in nature. It would be open to the accused to take other remedy as available in law so far as impugned order is concerned. Criminal appeal is dismissed. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)