HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S) No‘ 1300 of 2007 Pefi‘i'ioner Sm‘r. Uma Tiwnri Versus Responden‘l's : Sm‘l'e of Chha‘r'risgarh and ano‘ther' SB: Hon‘ble Mr. Jusfice Safish K. Agnihofri, J Present: Mr. Ami? Kumar Sharma, Advocafe for The pefifioner. Ms. Deepuli Pnndey, Panel Lawyer for Sfufe/respondenfs. O R D E R (Passed on this 8”' Day of March, 2007) 1. The pefifioner- was appoin‘fad on 23-2-1989 as Assisfanf Teacher on fixed pay scale of Rs. 300/-. Affer completion of fwo years probafion, he was gran'red regular pay scale. . Learned counsel appearing far fhe pefifioner submi-rs fhaf fhe issue involved in i’he case is as'l'o whe‘l'her, ‘l’he pe‘l’ifioner is en'l'ifled 'l'o regular pay scale wef. ‘rhe dafe of inifial appoinfmen'l or from fhe da‘l'e of complefion of proba'iion period. . The issue involved, herein was considered by fhe Madhya Pradesh S‘lai'e Adminisfrafive Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukan'l’ Yadu‘ and 56 o‘thers Vs. Sfafe of MP. & ofhers), wherein if was held fha'l +he similarly si‘l'uafed feachers are enfi'l'led fo regular pay scale wef. 'l'he da‘l’e of ini1'ial appoinfmenf. The ma1’1'er was faken up 'l'o ‘fhe Hon'ble Supreme Courf in Special Leave Pe'rifion (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said pefifion was dismissed by “rhe Hon'ble Supreme CouH upholding fhe decision of fhe Tribunal +0 The effect Tha‘r The Teachers/Assistan'f Teachers are en'ri‘rled fa regular pay scale from dafe of ini+ial appointment 4. Learned counsei appearing for fhe pe+i+ioner fur‘l‘her submifs fhai 'I'his Court while considering fhe some issue in sushil Tiwori & ofhers Vs. Sfu'i'e Govt of Chho‘Hisgarh & o‘l'hers (WP. (5) No. 5976 of 2006) by order dafed 7-11~2006, has gran‘i‘ed regular pay scale w.e.f. 1'he dafe of inifial appoin'hnen‘r. 5. Learned counsel appearing for fhe pari'ies joinfly submi'r fha'l' fhis case is squarely covered by The decision of This CourT in The case of Sushil Tiwari 6x oThers Vs. STaTe GovT. of ChhaTTisgarh (Si oThers (Supra). 6. In View of ThaT This peTiTion is allowed in The some Terms. No order as To cosTs. Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotn Judge l i