IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12186 of 2010 PIYUSH KUMAR @ PIYUSH KUMAR ROY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 02.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged against the petitioner that he caused fire arm injury on the knee of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that for land dispute the case has been lodged and in paragraphs 44 and 45 of the case diary the eye witnesses have stated that the informant himself caused the alleged fire arm injury for lodging the present case. The aforesaid version of the eye witnesses have been supported by the other witnesses as hearsay in paragraphs 47, 48 and 49 of the case diary and this fact has also been considered by the supervising officer in paragraph 29 of the case diary. Mr. Mehta learned counsel for the State submits that the informant has received three injuries though the injuries are simple. Considering the background in which the 2 occurrence took and the materials collected during investigation, let the petitioner, namely, Piyush Kumar @ Piyush Kumar Roy in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Nath Nagar P.S. Case No.188 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Anand Kr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)