( 1 ) sa371.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 371 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3005 OF 2010 Rajendra Goroba Kamble .. Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. A.H. Kasliwal (Jain) h/f. Mrs. Netrali N. Gangwal (Jain), Advocate for the appellant. Mrs. R.K. Ladda, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Jayant Chitnis, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 20.07.2011 P.C. :- 1. By consent, the following order is passed :- (a) The appeal is partly allowed. (b) The respondents/defendants are restrained from dispossessing the appellant/plaintiff from his land Gat No. 52, which originally admeasured 1 H 86 R and out of which he is in now in possession of 1 H 26 R without following due process of law. ( 2 ) sa371.10 (c) The appellant/plaintiff shall have liberty to challenge the order dated 31.01.2004, passed by the Superintendent, Land Record, Latur. (d) This order shall not be understood that it is in any way restraining the parties/officers of the State Government in implementing the consolidation scheme under the provisions of the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. 2. The Second Appeal accordingly stands disposed of. 3. In view of disposal of the Second Appeal, the connected Civil Application does not survive and stands disposed of. [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] snk/2011/JUL11/sa371.10