IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,SHIMLA. Criminal Revision No. 217 of 2011. Date of decision: 28.12.2011. _______________________________________________________ Sh. Sita Ram s/o Sh. Beli Ram, R/o Village Shamoh (Kaneta), Pargana Sandhurt, Tehsil Arki, Distt. Solan,H.P. ….. Petitioner. Versus 1. Sh. Sant Kumar s/o Late Sh. Nand Lal, r/o Village Sai, Tehsil and Police Station, Arki, Distt. Solan, HP. …..Respondent. 2. State of H.P. ….Proforma respondent. Revision Petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 03.09.2010 passed by Ld. Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Arki, in Case No. 142/2 of 2003 titled as “State of H.P. vs Sh. Sant Ram” whereby the respondent/accused has been acquitted of the charges under Section 406, 420, 451, 461, 462 and 120B IPC, with the prayer to set aside the same being illegal and contrary to the facts. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No For the Petitioner : Mr. V.S.Chauhan,Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr.D.S.Nainta, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl.A.G. with Mr. J.S.Rana, Asstt. A.G. for proforma respondent No.2. Kuldip Singh, Judge (Oral). The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that in view of amendment in Cr.P.C., appeal is maintainable instead of __________________ Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes …2… revision and, therefore, a submission has been made that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the revision petition with liberty to file appeal against the impugned judgment. Not opposed. The revision is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceedings against the impugned judgment. December 28, 2011. (Kuldip Singh), ( Krt) Judge.