@ saiznqmwni %ana,%Enag{ [( r Hi 2002— WTm ' wrf... . XI-HC-78 ‘WW (W) ’ WW§WW m£®aanw %a?%1n¢r%31‘ 8.1 1 .2006 Shri Adi! Minhaj, counsel for me petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, G.A.f r respondents Ne. 1 & 3lState. Shri Sourabh Shanna, c nse! for the’respondent No. 2. Heard. The insiant peiition is drected against the order of Annexure A/14 issued by respondent No. 2 whereby the petitioner was called upon to show cause as to why he should n'oi 3e relieved from his present piace of posting Chitrakut. Learned counsel for resp ndent No. 2 submits that return has already been filed on behalf of respond nt No. 2 and it has been stated in the return that by order of Annexure R/2 A dated 26.4.2003 the petitioner’s services have already been transferredf m Municipal Corporation Chilrakut to Nagar Panchayat, lLakhanpur on the s me capacity on the post of ln-charge Chief Municipal Officer and in pursu nce to the transfer order the petitioner has already joined his neWplace of osting vide Annexure R/2-B dated 5.5.2003. ln view of the above su mission by respondent No. 2, which is not disputed byilearned counsel for he petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P. 633/02 & l.A.No. 4830/02 stand disposed of. a . DgmuounuxNw§“y‘~ sap Judge "”