CRP 269/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T. VAIPHEI Heard Mr. D. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. R,C. Saikia, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. In the course of motion hearing, it has been noticed that the impugned order had been passed ex-parte, but the appellate court also at the same time issued noti ce to the petitioner to show cause as to why the impugned order should not be ma de absolute and fixed 3.8.2010 for its return for the show cause. This evidently shows that instead of approaching the appellate court to ventilate his grievan ce the petitioner has chosen to approach this Court under Article 227 of the Con stitution. It can not be said that the appellate Court has absolutely no jurisdi ction to pass the impugned ex-parte order. Under the circumstances, the revision petition is not maintainable in the present form. Resultantly this revision pet ition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to file his show-cause against the ex-parte impugned order within a period of one week from today with advance copy of the show cause to the learned counsel for the respondent. The respondent s will file their reply positively within one week thereafter. The appellate Cou rt will then dispose of the entire matter after hearing both the parties within one month from the date of receipt of the reply from the respondents. With the above directions, the revision petition is disposed of.