( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4237 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 610 OF 2009 Gajanan Ramesh Rajguru .. Applicant Aged 30 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Tilak Nagar, Sillod, Tq. Sillod, Dist. Aurangabad. Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Shri V.M. Kagne, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. B.R. Khekale, A.P.P. for respondent/State. CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 04.01.2010 P.C. :- 1. Heard Adv. Shri V.M. Kagne for the applicant and A.P.P. Mrs. B.R. Khekale for respondent/State. This is an application for bail pending appeal against order of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-6, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 34 of 2007, decided on 27.11.2009. The applicant is convicted of offences punishable under sections 498-A & 306 of the I.P.C. ( 2 ) 2. Both the advocate and A.P.P. have taken me through the judgment of the Trial Court. The learned advocate for the applicant mainly drew my attention to paras 21 and 22 of the judgment. It is case of the prosecution that for satisfaction of demand of Rs. 60,000/-, there was ill- treatment. 3. Considering the discussion, nature of evidence and also considering that the applicant is resident of Sillod having his business, I am of the opinion that this application can be allowed. Hence, the application is allowed. Pending the appeal, execution of sentence awarded to the applicant be suspended on applicant’s executing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with one surety in like amount. 4. The application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2010/JAN10/cra4237.09