IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYRNA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P.No.580 of 2006 Date of Decision:- 09.10.2006 Amrit Raj Sharma & ors. ....Petitioners through Mr.Amit Chopra, Advocate vs. Sarvesh Kaushal & anr. ....Respondents through Mr.G.S.Cheema, Sr.DAG, Punjab *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT *** SURYA KANT, J. The petitioners filed C.W.P.No.9064 of 2001 which was disposed of on March 9, 2006 in the same terms and with the same directions as have been issued in Samerjit Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others , C.W.P.No.8930 of 2001 decided on 8.2.2006. As a consequence of the directions issued by this Court, the respondents were under an obligation to declare the result of the petitioners for the posts of Physical Education Instructors after treating them eligible for the said posts. Alleging non-compliance of the aforesaid order, this contempt petition has been filed. In response to the show cause notice, Harcharanjit Kaur Brar, Director of Public Instructions (S.E.), Punjab has filed her third affidavit dated 9.10.2006 which is taken on record. As per the averments made in the affidavit, the result of the entire selection has been declared and published in daily newspaper “Ajit” dated 29.9.2006 and a correction thereof published on 30.9.2006. It has been further averred that except Petitioner C.O.C.P.No.580 of 2006 -2- No.1, rest of the petitioners have been selected. As regard to Petitioner No.1, it is stated that the last candidate selected in this category secured 47.73 marks whereas he secured only 39.13 marks. In this view of the matter and having regard to the fact that the directions issued by this Court have been complied with, no further action is called for in these contempt proceedings which are accordingly dropped. Rule discharged. October 09, 2006 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE