1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 1854 OF 2009 Sunil Putlaji Bhosale ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Through jail Mr. S.R. Shinde, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 2009 P.C.:- The petitioner’s application for parole has been rejected on the ground that the reason given for grant of parole was not sufficient. He had claimed that his mother was suffering from hypertension and depression, and she had no other persons to look after her. It was also rejected on the ground that when he was on parole previously, he surrendered late by 70 days. 2 2. We find that there is no ground to interfere. However, in future, if the petitioner seeks parole on any reasonable ground, that shall be considered on merits, and in any case, if he is entitled to be released on furlough, and application is made to that effect, that shall also be considered. 3. The petition stands disposed of. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.R. JOSHI, J.