1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1663 OF 2006 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.Vinod Jadhav Advocate h/f. Shri. V.D. Hon Advocate for Petitioner. Shri.V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for Respondents. .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 15TH JULY, 2010. PER COURT: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner had challenged the Government Resolution dated 3rd January, 2006, which policy decision has been reversed under Government Resolution dated 3rd November, 2007. Therefore, the Petitioner do not want to prosecute the Petition. The counsel therefore, submits that the 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Petition has become infructuous and it be disposed of accordingly. 2. In view of the statement made, the Writ Petition is rejected accordingly. [K.K. TATED,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] asb/JULY10/wp1663.06