1 Lpa 279/10 s IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION L.P.A.NO.279/2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7417/2010 The BPCL Employee’s Union and Ors. Appellants versus Bharat Petroleum corporn.Ltd. Respondents and Anr. Mrs.Neeta Karnik for Appellants Mr.R.S.Pai with Ms.Pallavi Dedhia i/b Sanjay Udeshi & Co.for Res.1 & 2 CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR& MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE: 29th NOVEMBER,2010. P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the appellant and respondents. No case is made out for our interference. In our view the order passed by the Single Judge by which the interim relief has been refused is not required to be interferred with by us. The learned Single Judge while admitting the petition , declined to grant interim protection by which it was observed that it would not be proper to direct the respondents to make payment towards Performance Linked Incentive Scheme for the years 2002-2003 to 2007-2008 as claimed as the petitioners were not paid this amount during the pendency of the 2 Lpa 279/10 reference . This being interlocutory order in our view the same is not required to be interfered with . The petitioners have requested to hear the Writ Petition expeditiously . We have no doubt considered the request of the petitioners for which the respondents have no objection . Learned counsel for the respondent states that as the payment is ex-gratia the petitioner is not required to claim it. L.P.A. is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. P.B.MAJMUDAR,J MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.