1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.REVISION APPLICATION NO. 311 OF 2002 CRI.REVISION APPLICATION NO. 311 OF 2002 CRI.REVISION APPLICATION NO. 311 OF 2002 CYRUS PESTONJI DUBASH ..Applicant. V/s. Jaksis Peshontan Dubas & Anr. .. Respondents. ----- Shri R.S. Tripathi for the Applicant. Ms. P.H. Kantharia for Respondent No.2 -State. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 28, 2005 DATED : FEBRUARY 28, 2005 DATED : FEBRUARY 28, 2005 PC :- PC :- PC :- . Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that he would like to examine whether appeal against acquittal was available against the impugned order. Even if Revision, as presented, was maintainable, the applicant should not have approached High Court directly without exploring the revision remedy before the Sessions Court in the first instance. . In the circumstances, this revision application is dismissed with liberty to the applicant to pursue appropriate remedy as may be advised, which will be decided in accordance with law. . Ordered accordingly. 2 .....