1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.380 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Panchal Components & Appliances Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant. Ms.Aasifa Khan for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 18TH SEPTEMBER 2009 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He brought to our notice that by the impugned order, the Tribunal has decided five appeals, out of which appeal has been filed only in one case, whereas in all other cases, the impugned order has been accepted by the revenue. 2. Under these circumstances, we do not see any substantial question of law arising in this appeal. The letter written by the revenue to the standing counsel appearing in this appeal, informing him about non-filing of appeals in other matters is retained in record. 3. The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)