WP(S)No €¢)2‘£> /2o11 Pe‘rifioner : / Om Prakash Sidar', 5/0 Shri Goverdhan Singh Sidar, Aged about 4Qye%rs U.D.T. AT Governmenf Middle School Nandeli, Block — JaiJaipur, Disff, Janjgir Champa-(C.G.) Jaw of Chhaf’nsgar'h Thr-cugh ‘ "me Seérefary Educa’non Departmem D.K.S. Bhawan, Ratpur, Disff. Raipur— (C.G.) Disfricf Education Officer, h Mm JEnjgir Champa-(C.G.) Join? Director, Account and Treasury, Dis1’f. Bilaspur- (C.G.) BJock Egucafion Officer, Block- Jaijm‘pur, Dis’n‘. Janjgir Champa—(C.G.) v \M WRIT PETITION UNDER ARUCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA t m Prakash Sidar ' Peitioner O t sar er etition uIAJ2,26 of the Constitution of Igdi‘ P a ‘ esponden Rts Ae: ' ppenmnc S A.S: Rajpt couse for the petitiner. hri u, nl o hri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the Stat S e. . (Passed on 30.9.20 1 1) 1. B this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to t espondents to a two adVance ncremens on assin ..I. examinaon,on hs own expenses, eore enterin earne counsel aearing for te petitioner submts th s e rn ntegra, as the same as een considered and decide I s well as ths Court in Yashwant Kuhiar Bharadwa . Municipal Corporation, Durg and another) and Gopes anoer * 12009111JR(sc)5 2 2006 (11) Mam—cog s WP (S) No‘4130 oo Sate of Chhattigh & ‘ Oths y he“; r py it pg. BT ti i bf g . Ld pp h i at the isue involved in th peset‘case is no iongen res; ’ i h b d by a by i j v _ h tha. ()MP9 s mos . Learne counsel furtha‘ submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision as atom—stated Thus the penuoner may be penmtted to make representation to dec1de ms case in the hght of afole-stated demslons, subject to venticatlon of the facts asto whether the petitioner has acquiled B.T.I. certiflcate on his own expenses before entering into setvice. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the State Govt. has also issued an order on 5th January, 201 1 (Annexure P-4). Learned counsel appearing for the $tate submits that in - I the event, the petitioner makes representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and in the light or the decisions of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra), as well as this Court inYashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (supra) and Gopesh Kumar Verma (supra), Within a penod of 3 months uom the date of recexpt of the representatlon . In'view of foregoing, according t9 the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. W Sd/—' Manindra Mohan Shrivastava : Judge d H . E ; i