HEGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT FETITEON (227) No. 1147 of2009 Operaton Kopra {Rajim} District Raipur (C G ) WRIT ?ETYHON UNBER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITLVfEON O? E'NDIA SB: Han’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihaéri. J. ?mseni: S’hri Shri Shashaiik Ajax Slu'ivastava 'E‘hakiir: ‘Pémel Adv 0c iaxar‘wr vie tor the for pmmoner 11:6 State @RAL GwER (Passed on 27E; day of Fgbmary, 2009) Learned cmmsel appearimg foy 'ihe yetitioner sgbmits ihat the peiitoiner has made a3} awlica‘mm before the respondwt No. 1 for gem: of temwraiy psnnii fer the route Rudri i0 Raipur via Dhamtari and vice- versa on 19.09.2008. Despite that the ’iempe’rary permit for ens month periad wag‘ grammi t0 tha respcndem No. 2 without consideymg the appiigaiion ofthe peiitioner. The period of permit i3 geing i0 came m aa end tomon‘ew. Thus, it is no: xieeeSsary to adjudkate upoia the dispute in respect of temporary pezmit granted t0 ihe yespondem N0. 2, {med 3.2.2009. 2. Shri Siu‘ivasiava. learned coumei ameazing for the peiitiener submits thai his applicaiions are Stu} pending consideration for gram of permit for the future period. LO Shri Thakur, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the respondem No. 1. submits their there are several appiicatiens penriing for grant of permit on iiie same route for future §erioxi A12 the applications shall be considered together arid appropriate orders shaii be passed 1'31 acoordaiioe with law. 4. in View of the foregoing, according to Siiri Shrivas‘iavs, nothing i \ survives for adjuciication. J ooorriingly, foe petiiion stands disposed’of. y Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i i i V i i \ i \x -\ i PETETKONER Krishna Kumar Nagwanshi s/o Ram Singh, AFFLICANT aged about 3G years, R/o Gondwara, Ring road,” Raipux, Tahsil & District‘Raipur (CG) VERSUS ‘RESPONDENTS '. 1. Sem‘etary, Ragiaaal Transmit ”\Au‘zhority RESPONDENTS Raipur (CG) 2‘ Hemant Kumar Saba sj’o Heriiai Sahu: Bus