IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S\ N0. <2.S ' a / 2008 ^s. ^- PETITIONER ^ ^^y >^y Smt. Priyanka Shrivastava, D/o Late D.L. Shrivastava, 25 yrs, C/o Smt. A. Shrivastava, House No. 16/421, Hanuman Nagar Titurdih, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretaiy, General Administration Department Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Water Resources Department, The Secretaiy, ^<wr \^ Water Resources ^p^ " 'jj^pv^ Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) /^^&-w 3) -^The Executive Engineer, Tandula Water Resources Division, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ._L.-_. ^ HSGH CQURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BiLASPUR PETITiONER WRiT PETiTION (S) N0,3116 Of 2008 Smt. Prlyanka Shrivastava RESPONDENTS Versus Stats of Chhaitisgarh & Othsrs (Writ petltion under Articie 22S & 227 ofthe ConstJtutlon of Indla) Single Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satlsh K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Prafuil Bharat, counsei for the petitloner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate forthe State. QRDER_(ORAu (Passed on thls 22"(a day of September, 2009) 1. VVith the consent of learnsd counsei appearing for the parties, the petitlon Is neard flnaijy. 2. The petiiloner, by thls petitJon, questions the legalifr^ and validlfry' of the order dated 8-8-2007 (Annexure - P/6) whereby the appilcation ofthe petltioner, wno happens to be the married daugnter of Shri D.L. Shrivastava, who dled' in harness while working as Asslslant Grade lli in Tandula Water Resources Divlsion, Durg, on 6-5-2007, as Is evldent froni death •certificate (Annexure - P/1), has been rejected on the ground that tnere Is no provision to grant compassionate appolntment toa married daughter of the deceased employee as per clause 3 ofthe circular dated 10-6-2003 (Annexure - P/8). 3. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner fairiy admjts that thouah the petitioner is not entltted to compasslonate appointment, however, having regard to the fact that the mother of the oniy marrled daught.er ^SS^^wS^- - of iate. Shri D.L. Snr^stava Is not well and nas no source of any income. 4. Be that as it may, it is a trlte !aw compassionate. appoirstment is not .as a matter of right, but it is a back door entry. The compasslonate appointment cannot be granted de the pojicy of the Government and,-as such, in thls case the policy does not provide for consideratiori of compassionate appolntment to a married daughter. The Impugned order is just, proper and needs no interference ofthls Court. 5. Accordlngiy, the writ petltlon Is dlsmlssed. No order asto costs. yown Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge