IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35770 of 2011 Rupam Devi, wife of Late Ramtahal Kamat, resident of village – Nauhatta- Purva, P.S. – Nauhatta, District – Saharsa. --------- Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar -----Opposite Party ********* For the petitioner : Mr. B. Shankar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Chandra Sen Pd. Singh, APP ****** 02. 11.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends her arrest in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 97/2011 for offences under Sections 406/409/420/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, is one of the named accused in this case being Mukhiya of relevant gram panchayat with allegation of committing some irregularities in execution of schemes in MANREGA and causing defalcation. Submission is that it suffers vagueness and there is nothing about the quantum of alleged defalcation whereas petitioner has committed no wrong nor issued any cheque etc. Investigation is at initial stage. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of her arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, till conclusion of investigation/submission of charge-sheet, let the above- named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 97/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till submission of charge-sheet, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)