THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1384 of 2010 Dated 09th March, 2011 Between: D.Muni Subramanyam Reddy …Petitioner And The Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam Board, rep.by its Executive Officer, Tirupathi, Chittoor District, and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri T.Niranjan Reddy Counsel for respondents: Sri Y.V.Ravi Prasad The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction directing the Respondents herein to renew the licence of the petitioner to run the Canteen in the 3rd respondent Hospital for a period of three years by enhancing the licence fee by 33.33% on par with other caterers by declaring the action of the Respondents in not extending the licence period to the petitioner by enhancing the licence fee on par with other caterers under the 1st respondent as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional.” At the hearing, Sri T.Niranjan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, stated that the subject matter of the writ petition does not survive for adjudication, as the dispute raised in this writ petition was subsequently sorted out during the pendency of the case. This submission of the learned counsel is not opposed by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, the interim order, dated 29.01.2010, granted by this Court, and extended on 15.06.2010 until further orders, shall stand vacated and W.P.M.P.No.1838 of 2010 and W.V.M.P.No.5163 of 2010 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 09th March, 2011 VGB