: 1 : sa.337.2010 vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.337 OF 2010 Sahadev Babaji Pawar & ors. .. Appellants V/s. Dwarkanbai Mahadev Pawar & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Manoj Bhatt for the Appellants CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DECEMBER 17, 2011 P.C.: 1. The appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff before the trial Court contending that there was an oral partition earlier under which the suit property was allotted to his share. That property was later acquired by the State for which compensation was payable to the owners. The plaintiff claimed that since there was a partition earlier and he became the owner of the property after 1967, the entire compensation should be paid to him. He therefore sought an injunction against the defendant Nos.2 and 3 from paying compensation to defendant No.1. 2. The Courts below have rejected the plaintiffs' theory of query for an oral partition in 1967 and have therefore dismissed the suit. In my : 2 : sa.337.2010 opinion, no substantial question of law arises for determination. 3. Appeal dismissed. 4. In view of the dismissal of the Appeal, Civil Application No.866 of 2010 does not survive and the same is dismissed accordingly. (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.)