IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2007 / 28TH PAUSHA 1928 WP(C).No. 1979 of 2007(I) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- C. SADANANDAN, KOLLARAKKAL HOUSE, P.O. ELATHUR, CALICUT-673 303. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN SMT.NISHA BOSE RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (COMMERCIAL) AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. AIRPORT DIRECTOR, AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, CALICUT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CALICUT-673 647. 3. THE MANAGER (P & T)/COMMERCIAL AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, CALICUT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, CALICUT-673 647. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)NO.1979 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of January 2007 JUDGMENT Petitioner is licensee for collecting entry fees at the Calicut Air port. The license period is over on 17-1-2007. Prayer in the writ petition is for direction to respondents to renew the license. However, Standing Counsel submitted that since there is expansion of Airport, fresh tender will be called only after completion of expansion work. For the time being Airport will manage this fee collection is the information stated in court. It is also stated that short tender will be called for awarding contract for collection of fees until new tenders are invited after completion and expansion. It is for the petitioner to submit tender for short term period as and when tenders are called for. There is no scope for this court to interfere with the present arrangement of the Airport authority collecting fees by themselves. Writ petition is therefore dismissed. So far as rebates claimed by petitioner, it is for the petitioner to claim it based on terms of contract and petitioner can agitate the matter after claim is considered and decided. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE jes