IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11461 of 2009 Meera Kumari Wife of Shri Jitendra Chaudhary, C/o Jitendra Chaudhary, resident of Village-and P.O. Gobindpur Via + P.S. Laheriasarai, District-Darbhanga -------------- Petitioner Versus 1. The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., through its Managing Director, 17 Jamshedjee Tata Road Mumbai,400020. 2. The Managing Director, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 17 Jamshedjee Tata Road Mumbai,400020. 3. The Senior Regional Manager, Hindustran Petroleum Corporation Ltd. VIth Floor, Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Bhawan, Post Box No.40, Dak Bungalow Chowk, Patna -800001 4. The Executive Director, L.P.G. ,Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Hindustran Bhawan 8,Shoorji Ballabhdas Market, Post Box No.155, Mumbai, 400001 5. Smt. Sipra 6. Smt. Renu Jha The name of fathers of both of them are not known, Hindustran Petroleum Corporation Ltd. VIth Floor, Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Bhawan, Post Box No.40, Dak Bungalow Chowk, Patna -800001 ------------ Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner : Shri Nandan Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Advocate. -------- 3 05-10-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Respondents. 2. The petitioner was an applicant for grant of L.P.G. Dealership, pursuant to application, Annexure-1. Her candidature has been rejected with reference to the resultsheet dated 31.12.2008, Annexure-2. Perusal whereof indicates that petitioner has been placed much below in the panel and she is challenging the result sheet with reference to the marks allowed to her and others under parameter capability to provide finance as according to her she having fulfilled the criteria required for providing finance as per the advertisement/ - 2 - brochure ought to have been allowed marks more than 21.1 as has been done in the case of private Respondent nos.5 and 6 who have been granted high marks to the extent of 35 and 32.2 under parameter capability to provide finance. 3. Let the petitioner represent within one week from the date of issue of the certified copy of this order before the Senior Regional Manager, Respondent no.3, highlighting the aforesaid aspects of the matter that she has been erroneously awarded lesser marks under the parameter capability to provide finance than the private Respondent nos.5 and 6 , who have been selected as first and second and have been awarded 32.2 and 35 marks respectively. The Senior Regional Manager should consider the representation and pass a reasoned order as early as possible in any case within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order indicating therein as to how the parameter capability to provide finance was assessed in the case of the petitioner and private Respondent nos.5 and 6. 4. Any appointment of the Dealer in the meanwhile shall be subject to the result of the representation filed by the petitioner. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. NKS/- ( V.N.Sinha, J)