IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 24533 of 2007 Between: Patibandla Babu Rao, S/o.Patibandla Narayana Rao, R/o.7/35,Mustabad(V), Gannavaram(M),Krishna Dist ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Executive Officer, Mustabad(V) G.P, Gannavaram(M), Krishna Dist 2 Sri Ramalayam, Temple Committee, Rep.by its Chariman,Kadiyala Sambasiva Rao, S/o.Kadiyala Venkata Rao R/o.Mustabad(V), Gannavarm(M),Krishna Dist .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more in the nature of writ of Mndamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent the obejection filed by the petitioner dt.13-11-2007 is illegal,null and viod and contrary to Art,14 and 21 of the Constitution of India in violation of Section 127 of A.P Panchayat Raj Act and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.H.V.R.R.SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.V.PRABHAKARA RAO The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.24533 of 2007 ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner is that the 2nd respondent has not only renovated Rama Mandiram and also it is going to erect Dwaja Stambham, without obtaining permission from the 1st respondent. The 2nd respondent filed a counter stating that the Rama Mandiram was constructed more than eighty years ago and it is in dilapidated condition and renovation of the existing Mandiram was only taken up, but no steps have been taken to errect Dwaja Stambham. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that recording the above said submission made in the counter, the writ petition may be closed. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, it is clear that the petitioner is not objecting for renovation of the Rama Mandiram. Insofar as erection of Dwaja Stambham is concerned, in case, it is erected, it is open for the petitioner to make representation before the Authority concerned. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 25-04-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{BMR}