'.<M 9 « •y f • e» ^. !< .* »»iii'o ;o- «.(3 W x4 tr <S d ^- t? Sl t:tt:t •d1 »s 'T^e., - - '<5~»i>i . :'«6 l,^<^ l"^ ,fv?-y"e ?w^4>^ I'^^'^b/ fi ~1 •^Jv "-,'r'^ v^ 1-A '^ ^••••^S^^f^- ^^•i^.,'^^-""""" C P 2^0 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAHISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.I WRIT PETITION (Cl N0. ^ ^ 2-©' QF 2007 OTHER MATTER ^"- ^^ FOR ISSUANCE OF A W,T ,N ,HE NATURE OF C ir'iM^'<» MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND/OR A SUITABLE DIRECTION OR 0 ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, ^\ ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER ^. „..„... .„ „„.»„.,„...,..^.. ' \... PETITIQNER -c!<< ^ ^ ^ ^N^ 1. Shri Battulal Sahu S/o Late Shri Hira Prasad Sahu, Aged about 72 years R/o Village - Bilaigarh , Block-Bilaigarh Distt.-Raipur [C.G.] ^ ./-' ,\ <<<^ ^<^\\^' <^'V2. ShriKushwa Ram Karsh S/o Shri ^ ^ "^' R/o Churrakachhar Q/1, P.0.- Janik ram, Aged about 58 years RESPONDENTS: Bhairotal Distt: Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Home Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter Raipur Distt: Raipur (C.G.) 3. Superintendence of Police Distt: Janjgir - Champa (C.G.j y ^4.Station House Officer, Pamgarh 1$ Distt: Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) DETAILS OF THE PETITIQN ^ c HIGHCQURTOFeHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR WRTF PETmON r0 No. 2920 of20Q7 PETITIONER : Shri Battulal Sahu & Another. .VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarfa & Others. WRTT PETmON UNDER AK.TICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA.. • ; : . . : - SB: Hon'ble ShrtSattsh K. Asnihotri. J. Present: Shri Sandeep Dubey, Advocate forthe petitioner. ShriM.P.S.Bhatia,DeputyGovemmentAdvocateforthe State/respondeflts. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed OD I Ith day of November, 2010) 1. The petitioners seek a direction to get the investigation done byfhe Central Bureau of Investigation or any other agency ofthe State for the alleged murder of their sons namely Amit Kumar Sahu and Khageshwar Ram Karsh,respectively, on the ground that despite investigation made bythe police, as is evident fromthe affidavit filed by Mr. G.L.Bharti, Deputy Supermtendent of Police, District Janjgir Chaitipa, no progress has beenreported. 2. Be that as it may, on the basis offacts, and afBdavits filed by the respondent authorities, it cannot be held fhat tlie police is not taking any step m investigation ofthe matter. However, having regardto fhe facts situation of the case, wherein the Deputy Superintendent of Police, in his communication to the OfBce of the Advocate General dated 18.10.2008 (Annexure R/3), has mentioned tliatin the previous nightof 27.10.2005, oneSuku Ram Sahu had evening meals with flie deceased. Thus, it is necessary to have iurther investigation in the -h^ •.^•..-ii-i-.S- ^ Amit matter, m order to establish faifli ofthe petitioners, who happeato be tfae fathers pfthe deceased Amit Kumar Sahu and Khageshwar Ram Karsh, mthepolice investigation. 3. Thus, even otherwtse, it is jyst and expedient t6 direct the Director Gsneral ofPolice, Chhattisgarh, to look into the matter and issue appropriate directions to the authorities below, so fhat the eulprits may be broughtto book, after properinvestigation, as early as possible; 4. Accordinaly; the writ petftion is disposed of wifh ftte aforesaid observationand direction. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge t) a> /& /•;'