IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14304 of 2005 Between: Domakunta Kavya, W/o.D.Sharat Kumar, R/o.Varikole Village, Parkal Mandal, Warangal district. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Collector (panchayat Wing), Warangal. 2 The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Mulugu, Warangal district. 3 The District Panchayat Officer, Warangal. 4 Doggala Swamy S/o. Bekari Varikole village, Parkal Mandal, Warangal District 5 Doggala Sambaiah S/o. Durgaiah Varikole village, Parkal Mandal, Warangal District 6 Smt. P. Sarojini W/o. Mallaiah Varikole village, Parkal Mandal, Warangal District 7 M. Samba Murthy S/o. Rajamallu Varikole village, Parkal Mandal, Warangal District 8 Smt. J. Swarupa W/o. Sampath Varikole village, Parkal Mandal, Warangal District 9 Smt. G. Lalitha Bai W/o. Ramulu Varikole village, Parkal Mandal, Warangal District 10 R. Pushpaleela W/o. Jampaiah Varikole village, Parkal Mandal, Warangal District 11 M. Poshamallu S/o. Lakshmaiah Varikole village, Parkal Mandal, Warangal District 12 Thumma Rajender S/o. Rajaiah Varikole village, Parkal Mandal, Warangal District RR 4to12 impleaded as per court order dt. 20-7-2005 in WPMP 19883 of 2005 .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.PRABHAKAR REDDY Counsel for Respondents 1 to 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. Counsel for Respondents 4 to 12: SRI E.VENKAT REDDY The Court made the following : O R D E R: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed to quash proceedings dated 21-06-2005, whereby respondent No.1 placed the petitioner under suspension for a period of three months. In the affidavit, the petitioner averred that she got elected as Sarpanch in the month of August, 2001. By the impugned proceedings, the petitioner was suspended for three months, which expired in September, 2005. Since the petitioner was elected for a five years’ term, which expired in the year 2006, and also the period of three months of suspension expired in September, 2005, the cause in this writ petition does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP No.18167 of 2005 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Dated 4th July, 2008 vrn