IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10733 of 2009 MD.MOFEED & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 27.8.2009 Learned counsel is permitted to make correction regarding the designation of respondent no.2. The petitioners state that they had only 14 decimal land pertaining to Khata No.557, Plot No.1429 situated in Village- Pupri, P.S. Pupri Bazar, in the District- Sitamarhi. Learned counsel submits that the Secretary, Krisi Utpadan Bazar Samiti, Pupri Bazar, respondent no.3, unauthorisedly took possession of the land of this petitioner as well as one Raghunath Prasad. However, the respondent has released the land of the aforesaid Raghunath Prasad. The petitioner submits that he had filed a petition before respondent no.3 who had recommended the matter to respondent no.2 through his letter no.439 dated 28.11.1987 as contained in Annexure-2. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioners have not given any specific details as to in what circumstances respondent no.3 has taken possession of the land in question. He also submits that the petitioners have not made any specific statement whether land acquisition proceeding has been initiated or not. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties this Court observes that respondent no.2, Special Land Acquisition 2 Officer, Bihar State Agriculture Vipnan Persad, Patna, would dispose of their representation within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order along with a copy of Annexure-2. Anilkrsinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)