IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No. 11138 of 2010. ======================================================= Kamleshwari Das, S/o Late Ram Sheshta Das, Vill - Maidini Chowki, Suryagarha, Distt-Lakhisarai ………………. Petitioner Versus 1. Raghuveer Yadav , Panchayat Sevak, Surajgarha Prakhand, Lakhisarai 2. B.D.O., Surajgarha 3. D.D.C., Lakhisarai, 4. District Magistrate, Lakhisarai ……………….… Respondents. ================================================= Appearance: For the petitioner: Mr Raj Kumar and Mr Praveen Kumar, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. M.K. Singh, G.P. XII. ======================================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 5. 31.08.2010. Heard the learned Advocates. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is brought in Public Interest by one Kamleshwari Das. The petitioner has questioned the construction of Krishi Kisan Bhawan over the land, Khata No. 80, Khesra No. 214, Gram Panchayat - Raj Banshipur, District - Lakhisarai. It is the claim of the petitioner that the aforesaid land belongs to Durga Sthan. It being a religious place, no construction can be made on the said land. Reliance is placed on the Government Circular dated 1st February 1999. Under the said circular, the State Government has 2 issued instructions, inter alia, not to make any construction under development projects at any religious place. The petition is contested by the respondent authorities. The Block Development Officer, Surajgarha, District – Lakhisarai has made counter affidavit. It is denied that the land in question is the land of Durga Sthan. It is stated that the land is a public land vested in the State Government on dissolution of Zamindari. It being a public land, construction of a building for public project cannot be questioned. However, it is admitted that in the revenue record the said land appears in the name of Durga Sthan Samiti. Learned Government Pleader XII Mr M.K. Singh has appeared for the respondent authorities. He has submitted that the concerned Circle Officer has initiated action for rectification of the revenue record. In above view of the matter, no further order is required to be made on this petition except that until the revenue record is rectified after following due procedure, further construction may not be made on the disputed piece of land. Subject to the above direction, the petition is disposed of. Dilip ( R. M. Doshit, CJ) ( Jyoti Saran, J)