IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 16311 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 23rd December, 2010. The State of Punjab Petitioner through Mr. H.S.Brar, Addl.AG, Punjab. Versus State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Mr. Girish Agnihotri, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Binayjeet Sheoran, Advocate. Mr. H.S.Sawhney, Sr. Advocate with Mr. B.S.Giri, Advocate for respondents No. 8. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] This Civil Writ Petition is directed by the State of Punjab against the order dated 19.08.2008 [Annexure P-4] passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab. Learned counsel for the respondents in whose favour the afore-stated order was passed, state that they have no objection if the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted to the Tribunal to decide the same afresh, in accordance with law. In this view of the matter and without expressing any views on the rival contentions of the parties, the impugned order dated 19.08.2008 [Annexure P-4] is set aside and the matter is remitted to the Tribunal to decide the appeals afresh in accordance with law at the earliest before 28.02.2011. Till then status-quo ante as it existed before passing of the Tribunal's order shall be maintained. Disposed of. Dasti. December 23, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE