IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.8132 -M of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : APRIL 20, 2010 SHER SINGH DHILLON & ORS. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS MANBIR KAUR .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. HS Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) This petition under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed for quashing of complaint entitled 'Manbir Kaur vs. Parampreet Singh and others' (Annexure P-1) under Sections 420, 376, 406, 498-A, 506, 120-B, Indian Penal Code, and order of summoning dated 12.5.2006 (Annexure P-2), passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridkot. Learned counsel for the petitioners has pointed out that in regard to the same incident, case FIR No.33 dated 21.2.2006 under Sections 406, 498-A, 420, 506, 120-B, Indian Penal Code, was lodged against the petitioners in Police Station, City Faridkot. The present complaint (Annexure P-1) was also filed. With the intervention of Criminal Misc. No.8132 -M of 2009 2 respectables and relatives, the issues were settled amicably. Compromise deed (Annexure P-3) has been executed accordingly, which has been duly signed by the respondent/complainant. In view of the compromise, the petitioners approached this court by way of filing CRM 4500-M of 2008. Vide order dated 27.5.2008 (Annexure P-4), passed in the aforesaid case, the FIR has been quashed. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the complaint in regard to the same incident is pending, which is also required to be quashed, in view of the facts given above. I have considered the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners. It transpires that in proceedings in CRM 4500-M of 2008, Manbir Kaur was impleaded as respondent No.2 and had appeared with her counsel, in court. Despite notice, however, the respondent- complainant has not put in appearance before this court. This matter is disposed of with directions to the Magistrate, who is dealing with the impugned complaint, to verify the factum of compromise from complainant-Manbir Kaur and pass appropriate orders, as the circumstances warrant. April 20, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?