1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.5030/2007 (Rameshwar Lal vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : October 26, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.R.K.Charan, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has been recovered from the petitioner and similarly situated co- accused Smt. Parveen Bano has been granted bail. This fact has not been disputed by the learned Public Prosecutor on the basis of the police investigation diary. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that nothing has been recovered from the present petitioner and the fact that similarly situated co-accused Smt. Parveen Bano has been granted bail, taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 2 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Rameshwar Lal s/o Bheru Lal alias Bhera Ji be released on bail in FIR No.234/2007, P.S. Kapasan, Distt. Chittorgarh provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-