IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.617 of 2008 Durga Yadav, son of Shri Deo Nandan Yadav, resident of Babhandih, P.S. Amas, District- Gaya ……………… Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Bihar, Patna 2.The District Magistrate, Gaya 3.The District Superintendent of Education, Gaya 4.The Block Education Extension Officer, Amas, District- Gaya 5.The Block Development Officer, Amas, District- Gaya 6.The Sub-Divisional Education Officer, Gaya 7.The Mukhiya, Karmdih Gram Panchayat, Amas (Gaya) 8.The Panchayat Secretary, Karmdih Gram Panchayat, Amas (Gaya) 9.Daya Shankar, son of not known, resident of not known ………… Respondents ----------- 3. 30/08/2010 Learned counsels agree that the Appellate Authorities constituted by the State Government under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Sart) Niyamvali, 2006 (as amended by Amendment Act, 2008) are now functional and hence an efficacious alternative forums is available to the petitioner and others for consideration of all their grievances in respect of their employment. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the concerned Appellate Authority, if not already 2 filed, for redressal of his grievances. In case such an appeal is filed by the petitioner within one month, the Appellate Authority shall consider the same and all documents enclosed therewith, including orders of this Court in identical matters, if produced, and other relevant records and make all endeavours to dispose of the same on merits after hearing the parties concerned by a speaking order, preferably within the time prescribed under the Rules for the purpose, without going into the question of limitation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)