-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.195 OF APPEAL NO.195 OF APPEAL NO.195 OF 2006 2006 2006 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.Sudhir Prabhu for the Appellants CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: MARCH 14, 2006. MARCH 14, 2006. MARCH 14, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Appellants. The Appellants are the Defendants Nos.1 and 2. The contention of the learned Advocate for the Appellants is that certificate under Section 32M of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 on which reliance was placed by the lower Appellate Court is contrary to the decisions in earlier proceedings under the said Act of 1948. 2. If the certificate under Section 32M of the said Act of 1948 has attained finality, the Civil Court could not have decided the case contrary to the said certificate. No substantial question of law arises. Second Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Judge. Judge. Judge.