1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1117 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1117 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1117 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.6974 OF 1998 WRIT PETITION NO.6974 OF 1998 WRIT PETITION NO.6974 OF 1998 Jagannath Daji Jadhav ..Petitioner/ Applicant Vs. Union of India & Anr. ..Respondents ----- Mr.Indrajeet Kulkarni for Petitioner Mr.D.A.Dube for Respondent no.1 Mr. C.R. Sonowane, A.G.P. for Respondent no.2. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. DATE: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005. DATE: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005. DATE: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. . The application is for setting aside the dismissal of the petition. We have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner/applicant and also considered the merits of the matter. The petitioner claims as to freedom fighter. There was no documentary evidence to that effect. In the absence of that the petitioner had to annex certificate of freedom fighter who had undergone two years imprisonment. It appears that such a document was not annexed. Considering that we do not want to interfere with the impugned order. . Learned Counsel however, submits that in the event of petitioner getting such certificate from a 2 freedom fighter to show that he had undergone two years imprisonment he may be allowed to submit fresh application. Considering the above statement we keep open it to the petitioner/applicant to forward the same to the State Government and State Government after considering the same may pass appropriate orders according to law. . With the above observations application along with the petition stands disposed of. (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.)