IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.17112 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : MAY 04, 2011 RAMESH CHAND ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, HARYANA & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. BS Saini, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. PS Sikand, Advocate, for respondent No.3. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 The petitioner was appointed as Lambardar for Village Chanda Kheri, Tehsil Bilaspur, District Yamuna Nagar, by Collector, Yamuna Nagar, vide order dated 15.7.2009 (Annexure P-1). Respondent No.3-Dinesh Kumar carried an appeal, which has been allowed by Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala Cantt., vide order dated 28.10.2009 (Annexure P-2). Revision carried by the petitioner against order (Annexure P-2) has been dismissed by Financial Commissioner, Haryana, vide order dated 11.8.2010 (Annexure P-3). 2 The Commissioner, essentially, set aside the order passed by the Collector on the ground that respondent No.3 is 8th class pass whereas the petitioner is 4th class pass. There is a Civil Writ Petition No.17112 of 2010 2 provision in Government notification that preference is to be given to a person, who is 8th class pass. Comparative merit has also been considered by the Commissioner, while passing order (Annexure P-2). 3 This court does not find any reason to judicially review impugned orders (Annexures P-2 and P-3) in extra ordinary writ jurisdiction. No demerit, such as criminal case, etc. can be pleaded in the case of respondent No.3, on the basis of record. 4 The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. May 04, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?