IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. App. No. 130 of 2009 Pramod Baliyan. .……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & another. .……… Respondents Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Pujari, Addl. Government Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. Kishore Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. The petitioner and respondent No. 2 are present in person. Compounding Application No. 544 of 2009 has jointly been filed, which is supported by the individual, separate affidavits of the petitioner as well as respondent No. 2. Since the parties have compromised, the offences are compounded. Based on the aforesaid, Compounding Application No. 544 of 2009 is allowed. The offences are compounded with the resultant consequence that Criminal Misc. Application No. 130 of 2009 is allowed and the proceedings are quashed with all the consequences. (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 22.05.2009 G