^ C-: S • \! IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (227) N0. 66SD /2008 PETITIONER; PLAINTIFF G.K. Chhanghani, - S/o LateShri S.K. Chhanghani, Aged about56 years, R/o 198, Sector-1, GeetanjaU Nagar, Post Shanker Nagar.Raipur (C.G.) ^ VBRSUS RESPONDENTS: DEFENDANTS ^ 1. GirijanandSingh, • . S/ o Hira Singh Chandi-akar, R/o Kasardih, Nav-Durga ChowK, DurgfC.G.) • 2. Ramavatar Agrawal, S/o NanhemalAgrawal, R/o Choubey Colony, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Satyabala Agrawal, — W/o Ramavatar Agrawal, ' R/o Choubey Colony, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Ram Vishal Kurmi, S/o Chandulal Kurmi, R/o ViUage-Rakhi, Tahsil-Ai^ng.Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.y ,• 5. State ofChhattisgarh, Through eollector, Raipur (C.G.): , ^6. Deputy Manager(Land), . New Raipur Development Authorily, Mantralaya, Near MahanadiGate, RaipurfC.G.) . ^ iHWRrr PETmON UNDER ARTICLB 227 ifeB-226-OF "!i: THBCONSTnTniONOFINDIAFORlSSUAN<^OF^R^INNATURe I! OFCBRnORARIANDOTHERSUITMBLEiWRITORWRITS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDfiRS: ?/ HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR PETITIONER W.P. (227) No. 6650/2008 G.K. Ghhanghani Versus RESPONDENTS Girijanand Singh and others SB:- HON'BLE SHRI N.K; AGARWAL.J PRESENT:- Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Raja Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents No. 2 & 3. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan. With Sm.t, Shashi Bareth, Adv. for the respondent No. 4. Shri G.D. Waswani, Govt. Adv. for the respondent No. 5 Shri Rakesh Dubey, Advocate, for respondent No. 6. None appears for respondent No. 1. ORAL ORDER (24-1-2011) 1. In the light of the fact that the land has already been transferred in favour of New R.D.A. and compensation amount has been paid to respondents No. 2 and 3,Shri Ashish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with Uberty to file an application for amendment regarding incorporation of subsequent events took place during the pendency of his injunction application. 2. Liberty, as prayed, is granted. 3. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. It is direcfed that if such amendment application is flled by the petitioner, the same shall be decided by the trial court in accordance with law. Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge :lJHi-