IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6295 of 2009 1. DAMODAR YADAV SON OF GYANI YADAV 2. BINOD YADAV, SON OF DAMODAR YADAV BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHARAHARA KHURD, P.S. FATEHPUR, DISTRICT GAYA---PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR------OPP. PARTY. ----------- 02. 21.07.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner no.1 is the father and petitioner no.2 is his son. They are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Sections 323, 435, 307, 34 of the Penal Code. It is submitted on their behalf that even as per the contents of the First Information Report there was none who became injured in the occurrence. In the circumstance, according to the counsel for the petitioner offence under Section 307 is not made out and appreciating such fact the informant on the intervention of the common friends has settled the dispute outside the court. Let the petitioners appear in the court below along with the informant and if the informant accepts that on account of intervention of the common friends matter has been settled out side the court then the petitioners above named be admitted to the privilege of bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 12 of 2003, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioners. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)