.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2067 OF 2003 Vishwambhar Maruti Kamble ...Petitioner. Versus Chief Executive Officer and four Ors. ...Respondents. .... Ms.Vijayalaxmi Nikam,Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.Birendra Saraf with Mr.Kunal Damle, Advocates i/b. Udwadia & Udeshi for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Ms.Madhubala Kajale, A.G.P., for Respondent No.5. .... CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : JULY 17, 2006. JULY 17, 2006. JULY 17, 2006. P.C.: 1. Earlier an affidavit has been filed on 27th September, 2005 setting out that the vacancies for the post of telephone operators had been cancelled and consequently the petitioner had no right. By an order of 20th June, 2006 we have directed the Respondents to file an affidavit setting out as to which posts in the organisation have been reserved for the disabled including visually handicapped; and the steps they have taken to fill in the said posts. Pursuant to that a reply has been filed on behalf of the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 by Mr.V.S.Bajwa. Various posts identified in .[2]. Class-I, Class-III & Class-IV. Insofar as Class-II is concerned, it is pointed out that there is no longer any Class-II post. In Para-8, it is further set out that Reserve Bank presently has not made recruitment of Telephone Operators either blind or non-blind and as and when any recruitment takes place, the mandate and spirit of the said act shall be dully honoured. Considering the above Petition stands disposed of. [F.I.REBELLO,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]