1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.472 OF 2009 Shri Rajesh Laxminiwas Mandelia ..... Applicant. vs. Shri Niranjan Gordhandas Nasta ..... Respondents & State Mr.Sandeep S. Kumbhar h/f H.H. Nagi & Associates for applicant. Mr.Niranjan Mundargi, Advocate for respondent. Mr. S.R. Shinde, APP for State. CORAM : SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED : 21st August, 2009. PC : 1. The parties desire to compromise the dispute in terms of consent terms tendered that are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. In view of consent terms, Criminal Revision Application (Stamp) No.472 of 2009 is allowed. The judgment and order dated 24th January 2007 of the Sessions Court is set aside. The Criminal Appeal No.508 of 2006 is allowed. The judgment and order dated 5th May 2006 passed by the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 12th Court, Bandra, Mumbai in C.C. No. 3220/SS/2005 is set aside. The applicant is acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act. 2. As per the consent terms the applicant is to complete payment of the amount agreed thereunder by the end of July 2010. In the event, the applicant fails to make the payment, as per the consent 2 terms, the respondent is at liberty to file an application for revival of the order dated 5th May 2006 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate. 3. In view of disposal of the Criminal Revision Application, the Criminal Application No.385 of 2009 does not survive, the same is accordingly disposed off. [SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.]