IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION No. 436 of 2008 (MS) Smt. Shobha Devi and others. ……Petitioners. Versus Collector/ District Magistrate, Haridwar and others. …Respondents. Mr. Bipin Mohan Pingal, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand/respondent no. 1 to 3. 1st December, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. Bipin Mohan Pingal, Advocate for petitioners and Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand/respondent no. 1 to 3. A statement has been made at the bar by Mr. Bipin Mohan Pingal, Advocate for the petitioners that the writ petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia,J.) 01.12.2009 Rathour