IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12774 of 2011 Dr.Sheodani Prasad Sinha, son of Late Kailash Singh, resident of Mohalla-Ind, Village-Barhiya, P.S. + P.O. Barhiya, District Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 3. The Registrar, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 4. The Finance Officer, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 5. The Principal, B.N.M. College, Barhiya, District Lakhisarai. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 3. 10.8.2011. Heard Shri Navin Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. Shalwi Rawat, learned A.C. to G.A.3, who appears on behalf of respondent no.1/Staste and Shri Anil Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 to 4/Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 31.12.2009 as Lecturer, Department of Chemistry, B.N.M. College, Barhiya under Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, has prayed for directing the respondents to clear some of the arrears, which includes arrear of salary from July,1982 to September,2002 amounting to 2 Rs.4,63,390/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the claim mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner has filed number of representations before the Registrar of the University. However, till date, no decision has been taken nor dues have been cleared. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3/Registrar, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, the respondent no.3 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no.3 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment of the dues within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.3 is required to pass a 3 speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within four months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)