THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No. 5487 of 2009 ORAL ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the orders of the learned III Addl. Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in C.M.A.No. 8 of 2008, dated 17.7.2009. Brief facts of the revision are that: Petitioner herein is the Plaintiff-Appellant and the respondent herein is the defendant-respondent before the courts below. For the purpose of convenience, the parties as arrayed before the trial Court are referred to hereinafter in this order. Plaintiff filed a suit O.S.No.754 of 2007 before the learned trial Court against the respondent-defendant for perpetual injunction. In the said suit, the Petitioner-Plaintiff filed an I.A.No. 285 of 2007 seeking grant ad interim injunction against the respondent and the person claiming through him from carrying on any sort of construction activity over the suit schedule property bearing No. 3-5-781 and 3-5-781/A admeasuring 603 sq.yards. After hearing both the parties, the learned trial Court has dismissed the said petition. Challenging the said order, the defeated petitioner-plaintiff has preferred C.M.A.No. 8 of 2008. After hearing both the sides, the learned lower appellate Court also dismissed the said appeal confirming the order of the learned trial Court. Aggrieved by the orders of both the Courts below, the present Civil Revision Petition has been preferred. Heard both sides. Initially, the petitioner-plaintiff filed O.S.No. 754 of 2007 before the learned trial court for perpetual injunction. In the said suit, he filed an application I.A.No.285 of 2007 seeking ad interim injunction. The lower Court granted exparte injunction on 20.2.2007 and after hearing both the parties, the learned trial Court has vacated the said interim order and thereby dismissed the said injunction petition. On appeal by the defeated petitioner, the lower appellate Court after hearing both the parties had dismissed the said appeal. On perusal of the order under revision, it is clear from the orders of the Courts below that unless and until the petitioner establishes title over the suit schedule property, he cannot be held to be entitled for temporary injunction. Under these circumstances, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the order of both the Courts below. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. _______________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J 19.11.2009 CHV