IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2008 / 24TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 18444 of 2008(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- BUS TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION OF KERALA (REG. NO. TCR 710/2006) DOOR NO. 35/1085, M.K.K.NAYAR ROAD , PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI 682 025 REPRESENTED BY IT GENERAL SECRETARY,P.K.NANDANAN BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & CHAIRMAN REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY ERNAKUKLAM 3. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM. 4. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.PRABHAKARAN, SC, K.S.R.T.C. FOR R4 GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.V.MANOJ KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.18444/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT ADDRESSED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT 11/6/2008. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DT. 13/6/2008. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT 8/1/1985 IN OP NO.5609/1983. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT 2/7/2008 ADDRESSED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXTS. OF R4 EXT.R4(a): TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT NO.P.TEM.C6/81039/2008 DT.20.6.2008. EXT.R4(b): TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT NO.P.TEM.C6/81042/2008 DT.20.6.2008. EXT.R4(c): TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT NO.P.TEM.C6/81044/2008 DT.20.6.2008. EXT.R4(d): TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT NO.P.TEM.C6/81047/2008 DT.20.6.2008. EXT.R4(e): TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT NO.P.TEM.C6/81048/2008 DT.20.6.2008. EXT.R4(f): TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT NO.P.TEM.C6/81049/2008 DT.20.6.2008. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 18444 OF 2008 U ==================== Dated this the 15th day of July, 2008 J U D G M E N T In this writ petition, though the complaint of the petitioner was that KSRTC was operating without permits in non notified routes, since permit have been granted subsequently, learned counsel for the petitioner is confining his prayer for a consideration of Ext.P4 application filed by them before the 3rd respondent. The prayer in Ext.P4 is for settlement of timings in pursuance to the permits granted to the KSRTC. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, Ext.P4 has been received that will be taken note of by the 3rd respondent and appropriate action shall be taken in this regard. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp