® d, \? ATFISGARH AT BILASPUR GH COURT OF CHH CONTEMPT PEYmON No (2005 ‘SWWE E§$§§l S/o Late Pandit Shrl R5. Thaker, Aged t 60 years, Reader, ‘P.’S.M. Medica\ Couege, IN THE H1 xDr. NN Thaker abou Department, Raipur (C.G.) Kg, A§PL1CATXQN UNDER SEC.‘{Z OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF 1ND1A /~’r—————-——v—JA-h'~—- Q§.e=:° ¢ Q‘wxwN NON—APPLICANT V VERSUS 1. Shn BL Agrawal Member Secretary (Pubhc Health Family WeWare and Medical Education Department), Secretariat, D KS Bhawan Rarpur XI—HC—78 mw,m,m cw- Pak éL/w/ WW(W) mavrm WWW mwmm WW WW éawm q \ @ 31-8-2006 . Shri SC. Verma, counsel tor tne petitioner. Shn UNS. Deo, Govt. Advocate for the State. Heard. This Court passed an order dared 3-1-2005 in W.P.No.3145r’2004 directing t'ne respondents to decide the representation or the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of production of representation. The said order is a by—parte order. Learned counsei for the petitioner submits that ih compuance or the order passed by this Court the petitioner submitted representation before the authorities. it is submitted that even after iapse of considerabie period, the representation of the petitioner has not been decided. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and materiai on record, instead of p'oceeding further in the contempt petition, saga in the interest of justice, the au:horities concerned are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner, if not aiready decided, within a period of one month from the date of 'eceipt/production of a copy of this order, faiiing which, the authorities concerned wiii responsrbie not only ror non- compiiance of the eariier order but this order as weii. ‘ Accordingiy, the contempt petition stands disposed or. Certified copy as per ruies. "A sai— Copy to State counsei. i 1 Fakhrudtirig, , Judge ‘ arHAIH / (“wm \\\t 7\\ sweat” P.T.O. \91