(^f \ -sss j— BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA.SPUR (C.G4 Co WRIT PETmON N0. ^&i8 /2006 PETITIONER ^^$. ,.-,n.-•••"" ^••;\''^..-''" ^^5^"'" y^ ^...-- '&^-"" RESPONDENTS JAWAHAR KHANNA, AGED, ABOUT 41 YEARS, SON OF LATE SHRI K.K. KHANNA, RESIDENT OF AWANTl VIHAR, RAIPUR (CHHATT18GARH) VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH^ THROUGH - THE SECRETARY, NAGARKA PRASHASHAN VIBHAG, DAU KALYAN SINGH BHAWAN, RMPUR 1C.G.) 2. THE NAGAR NIGAM, RAIPUR, THROUGH - 1TS CH1EF MUNICIPAL OFFICER. WRIT PETITIO_N UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT / 1TS, ORDER ; ORDERS, D1-RECT10N ; D1RECT10NS ETC. CS'JE_^___ . XI-HC-22 3TI^?T^iT f^iRisn^r shlititrfN H ' ""\. -y' ^' TTRCIT aWR) 73f •^l^M^, ^S\WW, (s|Cliy^< ^^ML..^ ,,^ ^vs. 05.09,2006 couAsel Indla ShriY.C.Sharma, Shri Suniesh Bajaj, respondent No. 1 on advance| Heard. By way of this writ of the Constitution of issuance of a direction to fh] proceediags of giaiit of leas^ accordiug to him^is pendiag last 9 yeara and presenfly, with the authorities of attention of fhis Court which is a meino/notice iss] Raipur to sonie niember of T| it is mentioned that fhe persons is pendiag before th| Leamed counsel for fhat fhe petitioner is one| reference is fh.ere ia fhe fhis petition inay be aufhorities of State inatter within the stipulated Leamed counsel for sware about pendency ofan] for the petitioner. G^vemment Advocate for the State/ |copy. pcftition, fanfcr wrfcPfrf WDcif fffe^t rfsTRTC iT3rfWT3T^?r jtition, ffled uiider Ai-ticle 226/227 ^EL, fhe petitioner has prayed for State Govemment to expedite fhe in favoiir of ftie petitioner, which^ Ibefore fhe various authorities siace Ithe laatter is under consideration State Goveniment. He draws document- Annexure P-5, by fhe Municipal Corporation, fagrik Saagharsh Saiuiti, ui which, pertauiing to the lease of 98 State Govei-ument, petitioner makes fhis statement of fhe said 98 persons, whose jio, Annexure P-5. He submits fhat of wifh a direction to the to dispose of fhe pendiag Iperiod granted by this Court. the State submits fhat he is not such proceeduig before fhe State tike toliffards isskied mfctter the meilio disp]osed Goventtinent ^^ss^^^^^^ 311^1 ^acb KraclTsh*1|cb •--•--•••--•••••••••- ^pj- 200 f^)% sn^r^r f^iwan^T SfiIIW.Rf?? -^ ^:-. h"s- Mtn&s. 3n^TCTaiWBf?(T 7-- Govem.ment. Hoivever, if| the State Goveranient, th^ within a reasonable period Consideiing the fac) particularly considerins counsel for the petitioner especiafly Annexure P-5, direction fhat if aay matteif iu favoiir of the petitio) Govemment, the same law as early as possible, pif froin the date offiling ofa fhe copy ofawrit petition If the raatter is pending before the State efficacy pertaining to abov^ The matter stands Certified copy as per| shdU alre^dy <*i<<Fd'!fli-i ^it<riTffte^)'<Rf(.di< ^sri^iran^T |the proceediags are pendiag before i^y may be directed to be expedited |in accordance with law. ts and circumstances of the case, 1jbe submission niacte by leamed ^nd after going through the record, piis petition is disposed of with a f, pertaining to grant of lease of laad ^ier is pendiag beforc the State be disposed of iu accordance wifh •ferably withiD. a period of6 inonths <|;ertified copy ofthis order along with Uefore the State authorities. disposed of or the same is not ^uthorities, this order shall have no directions, fu|iaUy disposed of, Irules. -— Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge