IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.177 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 08.01.2010. Jaikaran Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.N.K.Banka, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is working as a Medical Laboratory Technician Grade-I in the Health Department, Government of Punjab. He is aggrieved at the order dated 3.12.2009 whereby he has been transferred from Amritsar to Ferozepur. It appears that the petitioner has been working at Amritsar since May, 2007. The petitioner;s primary grievance is that on account of his serious ailment like spinal tuberculosis which requires constant treatment and monitor, his case deserves to be considered for retention at Amritsar and/or at nearby place on compassionate ground. The petitioner's daughter is also alleged to be unfortunately suffering with muscle deformation. C.W.P.No .177 of 2010 2 After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner at some length, I am of the considered view that in such like matters, the most appropriate recourse for the petitioner would be to represent and persuade the respondent-authorities alongwith necessary medical records in order to show that, in the peculiar facts and circumstances, he deserves to be retained at Amritsar and/or may be posted at nearby place. If any such representation is made by the petitioner within two weeks, the respondent Nos.1 & 2 are directed to consider the same sympathetically and in accordance with the Government policies. The writ petition stands disposed of. Dasti. 08-01-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE