wp2948.11.odt 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETN. NO.2948/2011 Dnyaneshwar Krushnarao Thakre -vs- Mahadeo Dashrath Raut and others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri S. C. Bhalerao, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri A. Sambre, the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 3. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : 06.09.2011. Heard. The trial Court had granted a temporary injunction in favour of the petitioner restraining the respondents from interfering with the possession of the petitioner over the suit property. The First Appellate Court, however, reversed the order passed by the trial Court by holding that the petitioner did not have a prima facie case. Both the parties are claiming to be in possession of the suit property. The learned counsel for the parties agree that no fruitful purpose would be served in case this Court issues rule in the matter and directs the parties to maintain status quo. In such circumstances, it would be necessary in the interest of justice to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the parties to maintain status quo and a further direction to the trial Court to decide the suit as expeditiously as possible. wp2948.11.odt 2/2 Hence, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the parties to maintain status quo and a further direction to the trial Court to decide the suit as expeditiously as possible. No order as to costs. JUDGE KHUNTE