1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No.12737 Of 2008 In Second Appeal Stamp No.23967 Of 2008 City & Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Aurangabad. ... Applicant. Versus Manikrao S/o Dagdu Shinde And Another. ... Respondents. -------- Shri. A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for applicant. Shri. S.V. Gangapurwala, Advocates for respondent Nos.1 and 2. -------- CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. DATE: 22nd JANUARY 2010 PER COURT : 1) Heard respective counsel for the parties. 2) This is an application seeking condonation delay of one year and 180 days in 2 presenting the second appeal. It is stated against the impugned order a writ petition was earlier presented which was disposed of holding that the writ petition was not entertainable and remedy of appeal seems to be available for the applicant. In this view of the mater, the time consumed in prosecuting the remedy of writ petition is required to be excluded while computing the period of limitation. 3) Considering these aspects the application for condonation of delay needs to be considered favourably. Accordingly, the delay of one year and 180 days occurred in presenting the second appeal is condoned. The civil application stands disposed of. (R.M. BORDE, J.) rsl/ ca.12737.08