IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3034 of 2009 MURLIDHAR JHA . Versus THE B.N.MANDAL University .& ORS. . 7 15.03.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the opposite party-University. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite party and a rejoinder has also been filed to the show cause. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party-University submits that the admissible payments have been made to the petitioner in the light of the grievances raised by the petitioner through his representation. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the calculation shown in the revision of pension indicating the amount of rupees twenty-two lakhs and odd is not giving any details and secondly still the amount of gratuity indicated in the said calculation is lesser by a sum of rupees five thousand and odd and the fact that merger of fifty per cent of dearness relief into the basic pension was required to be done besides the inter over the unpaid amount. Learned counsel for the University submits that so far the order of the Court is concerned, the same has been complied with by making the necessary payments, - 2 - and as such, this contempt application need not proceed further, however, if the petitioner is in position to point out any mistake in the calculation as contained in Annexure-A, it will be open for the petitioner to point out the same, which shall be looked into as per law. In the above circumstances, since the order of this Court has been complied with, this contempt application need not proceed further. However, it will be open for the petitioner to point out the mistake in the aforesaid calculation as contained in Annexure-A and if the same is pointed out through a fresh representation, the same shall be considered and disposed of at the earliest by a reasoned order. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)