WP(C) 2930/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T VAIPHEI Heard Mr C Baruah, the learned counsel for the petitioner and J Singh, the learn ed standing counsel for the Social Welfare Department. There is no dispute at the bar that this case is covered by WP ( C) No. 4083/2010. The petitioner is aggrieved by the refusal of the State responde nts to appoint her to the post of Anganwadi Worker in Katahguri Chubahi Madrassa Ward No.3 Anganwadi Centre under the respondent No.4 and by appointing the resp ondent No.5, who is not a resident of that place where the center is located in violation of the norms and guidelines issued under the Notification dated 31.08. 2007. The petitioner has apparently been working as Anganwadi Helper in Anganwad i Centre Ward No.2 since 01.10.2007. According to the petitioner, the appointmen t of the respondent No.5 is actually an up-gradation from the post of Anganwadi Helper to the post of Anganwadi Worker, which was not envisaged by the norms and guidelines and also by the advertisement. As factual disputes have been raised by the petitioner, it will be more appropriate for the Director of Social Welfar e, Govt. of Assam (respondent No.2) to examine the grievances of the petitioner and thereafter take appropriate action in accordance with law. Order accordingly . The entire exercise shall be completed by the respondent No.2 within two month s from today. The petitioner will furnish a certified copy of this order as we ll as the copy of the writ petition together with annexures to the respondent No .2 within seven days from today. If the petitioner is still aggrieved by the decision of the resp ondent No.2, it shall be open to her to approach this Court again. The writ petition is disposed of with the above terms.