I I 2 1. SMT. SEENABAI W/0.APPARAO JADHAV. AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 0CC: HOUSE HOLE) WORK. 2. ANGAI)RAO 5/0. MARL’TIRAO1 JADHAV. AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 0CC: AGRICULTURE. BOTH ARE R/O.UJALAM. TQ: BASAVAKALYAN. DIST: BIDAR - 585401. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AMEET KUMAR DESHPANDE, ADV. FOR R2, Ri SERVED) THIS TWA FILED U/S.96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT. 3.3.2007 PASSED IN O.S.NO. 100/2004 ON TILE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.I)N). BASAVAKALYAN. DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PRE-EMI’TION AND FOR PERPETUAL INJUNCTION. THIS RFA COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY. ThE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- JUDGMENT There is no representation on behalf of the appellants. On 17.11.2011 case has been adjourned, as a last chance. On 07.12.2011 also there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. The 4... 3 appellants are not diligent in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd JUDGE Srt