IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2010 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 36684 of 2010(I) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- HOTEL SAGAR, INDIRA GANDHI ROAD, CALICUT-673 001, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER K.T.HAMZA. BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.VIJAYAMOHANAN SRI.ALAN PAPALI SRI.GILBERT GEORGE CORREYA SRI.NISHIL.P.S. SMT.DHANYA P.ASHOKAN SMT.ANITHA MATHAI MUTHIRENTHY SMT.O.V.BINDU RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE KOZHIKODE CORPORATION- REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE, KOZHIKODE-673 032. 2. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE DEPOT, KOZHIKODE-673 001. 3. THE KERALA SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. (SIDCO), GANDHI NAGAR, KADAVANTHRA, COCHIN-682 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER. 4. SRI.E.ARUNKUMAR, EDAKOTH ADVERTISERS, EDAKOTH HOUSE, PANTHEERAMKAVU P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 019. R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.D.BABU,SC,KOZHIKODE CORPORATION R2 BY ADV.SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR, SC., KSRTC. R3 BY ADV.SRI.R.T.PRADEEP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 36684 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 15th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner has approached this Court complaining that the 4th respondent has installed certain hoardings in the premises of the 2nd respondent on behalf of the 3rd respondent. It is complaining of the above, the writ petition is filed. Standing counsel appearing for the 1st respondent on instruction submits that on receipt of the complaint from the petitioner, enquiry was conducted and that the Corporation is in the process of initiating steps under Section 406. Thus, it is obvious that the complaint of the petitioner is being acted upon by the 1st respondent and therefore directing that appropriate action thereof shall be continued in accordance with law, the writ petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp