IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. Urgency Application No. 5070 of 2005 In Writ Petition No. 462 (S/S) of 2005 Govind Ram, son of Sri Narayan Dutt, resident of ner Harjeet Traders, 15 Kalyani View Ravindra Nagar, Kichcha Bye‐Pass Road, Rudrapur, District‐Udham Singh Nagar ………….Petitioner. Versus 1. General Manager (Service) U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation Ltd. Lucknow, U.P. 2. Regional Engineer, Haldwani, District‐Nainital, U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation Ltd. Bench ‐ Rudrapur, Udham Singh Nagar. 3. Advisory Committee, State of U.P. 4. Prabhari, U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation Ltd. Centre Rudrapur, District‐Udham Singh Nagar. ….….Respondents. Hon’ble M. M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri S.S. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Smt. Been a Pandey, learned standing counsel, who has accepted notices on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for the both the parties are agree to decide the writ petition at its admission stage itself. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the relieving order by which the petitioner, who was working as Tractor Operator in Rurdrapur, has been relieved for Rampur. In compliance of the relieving order the petitioner has joined his duties on 02.02.2005 at Agro Centre Rampur. Learned standing counsel has challenged the maintainability as well as the grounds taken by the petitioner in the writ petition. She has also raised objection regarding jurisdication of the writ petition. She has further submitted that petitioner had already joined his new place of posting and now, retired from the services. Hence, the relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner has become infructuous. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned standing counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (M. M. Ghildiyal, J.) August 2, 2005 SKSharma