IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 46886-M of 2007 Dated of decision : January 10, 2008 Anwar Masih .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Arya, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL, J. The challenge in the present petition is to the order dated October 21, 2003 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra whereby revision filed by the petitioner under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Code”) against the order dated July 20, 1999 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kurukshetra summoning the petitioner under Sections 218, 465 read with Section 120-B IPC was dismissed. In view of the settled position of law vide judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Dharampal and others Vs. Smt. Ramshri and others 1993 (1) Recent Criminal Reports 697, the present petition filed under Section 482 of the Code for quashing of order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra, against which second revision is not maintainable, cannot be entertained. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not maintainable. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the complaint before the Court below is pending for the last about 8-9 years and petitioner had to regularly visit Kurukshetra from his place of posting in Punjab, accordingly, he prays that his personal appearance may kindly be exempted. Prayer seems to be reasonable keeping in view the long pendency of the complaint. The petitioner may move an application for the purpose before learned Court below, which shall grant him exemption from personal appearance on such terms as may be deemed appropriate. The trial of the complaint be expedited. The petition is disposed of accordingly. January 10, 2008 (Rajesh Bindal) Pka Judge