IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1270 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.C.SRIVASTAVA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- RAVAL PARESHABEN KESHUBHAI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR ASHOK L RAVAL for Petitioner -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE D.C.SRIVASTAVA Date of decision: 22/02/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on admission of this petition. 2. In the course of argument, the learned counsel argues that the petitioner may be permitted to submit his representation before the respondent no.3, ventilating all his grievances and the respondent no.3 may be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within time frame to be fixed by the Court. 3. As such, the petition can be and is finally disposed of at the admission stage with direction to the petitioner to move a detailed written representation to the respondent no.3 within two weeks from today, and the respondent no.3 is directed to dispose of the representation so received within three weeks from the date of receipt of representation, through speaking order. No order as to cost. Direct service is permitted. February 22, 2001. [ D.C. Srivastava, J.] /sakkaf