IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14288 of 2010 Senior Divisional Commercial Superintendent, Divisional Office, Northern Railway, Ambala Cantt. Vs. Om Bati & another Present: Mr.G.S.Bal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The fact that respondent No.1 had worked with the petitioner for several years, though as per the stand of the petitioner, as a part time. The Labour Court found that the services of respondent No.1 were terminated when she made request for wages. She had made prayer for wages, which were paid before the Conciliation Officer. The fact that respondent No.1 had worked with the petitioner stood established from the suggestion given to her while she was being cross-examined and it is as follows:- “It is wrong to suggest that I was working for two hours a day, rather I was serving for the whole day.” The Labour Court was fair enough to grant the reinstatement but without back wages. Considering the fact that respondent No.1 is a poor Sweepress and was made to work without wages, no case for interference in the impugned award is made out. Dismissed. August 12, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE