IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1586 of 2006 BINDESHWAR RAI @ BINDESHWAR RAI Versus JHAGRU SAHNI ----------- 2 12.01.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, an amendment of the nature allowed by the Court below in the impugned order, would not require any interference by this Court taking into consideration that all that the plaintiff- opposite party has been allowed by the Court below in the impugned order is to explain his boundary by way of such amendment which was also spelt out in the original plaint. Counsel for the petitioner, in that view of the matter as also realizing the scope of interference of this Court under Section 115 C.P.C. seeks permission to withdraw this application. This application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)