[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL W.P.NO.969 OF 2008 Mr.Prajakt Shantilal Bora ..Petitioner Vs. Mrs.Sarika Prajakt Bora and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.R.M.Hardas advocate i/b Mr.P.N.Joshi advocate for petitioner Mr.Jay K.Bhatia Adv. for Respondent no.1 Mr.Y.M.Nakhwa A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 18, 2008 DATE : NOVEMBER 18, 2008 DATE : NOVEMBER 18, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioner-husband and the learned advocate for the respondent no.1-wife. 2. Being aggrieved by the order dated 6.3.2008 passed by the Family Court, Mumbai in Interim Application No.240 of 2007 in Petition No.E 261 of 2007, this petition has been preferred. By order dated 6.3.2008, the Family Court directed the petitioner-husband to pay Rs.5,000/- each per month to the wife as well as to the minor daughter Shruti [-2-] towards interim maintenance with effect from 11.6.2007. It is seen that husband is Chartered Accountant. He has his own office at Shrirarmpur, whereas there is no material to show that respondent-wife has any source of income. Moreover, the order is passed in interim application and main matter is still pending before the Family Court, hence, I am not inclined to interfere at this stage. Petition is rejected. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]