IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No. 4953 of 2008 Date of decision: 15th November, 2010 Sh. Pawan Kumar Thakur Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner: Mr. V.D. Khidtta, Advocate. For respondents Nos. 1 &2: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Additional Advocate General. For respondent No. 3: Mr. Ramesh Kaundal, Advocate. Deepak Gupta, J. (oral) Sh. V.D. Khidtta, Advocate states that despite repeated letters written by him to his client, the petitioner was not responded. 2. The petitioner by means of this petition has basically prayed that the persons with disability should be considered for the Class-I post of Agriculture Development Officer. This matter is no longer res-integra and covered by a number of judgments of this Court and Apex Court. Therefore, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents that in case the petitioner approaches them within two months 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. 2 from today for appointment to a suitable post in accordance with Persons with Disability (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 than his representation shall be considered in accordance with law. In case he does not approach the authorities within the aforesaid period, this petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed. (Deepak Gupta) Judge November, 15, 2010 (KRS)