IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO PETITION NO PETITION NO. 1503 OF 2009. 1503 OF 2009. 1503 OF 2009. Smt Laxmibai Namdeo Pukale ... Petitioner. Vs. Smt Balutai w/o Pandurang Pukale... Respondents. and Ors. Mr Machindra Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 02.02. 2009. 02.02. 2009. 02.02. 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. Perused petition. 2. This petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order dated 18.3.2008 passed by the Presiding Officer, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Maharashtra State, Mumbai in Revision Application No.4 of 2007. 3. Having gone through the impugned order, it is clear that view taken is a reasonable and possible view. During the course of hearing, no perversity or arbitrariness could be demonstrated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, either in the petition or in the impugned order. No case is made out for admission of the petition. Consequently, the petition is liable to be dismissed. 4. In the result, the petition is dismissed in limini. No order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, J.) J.) J.)