-i ,l>-Jt \ I 36 $- * IN THE IIIGH COURT w.P.(cRL) r2r3l20ro MOI-ID ZAKIR & ORS Through: OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Petitioners Mr. V.K. Upadhyay, Adv: ,} vctsus S'|ATE OI.'D}]I,I{I ..... Rcspondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel with Ms.Laxrni Chauhan, Adv. for NCT of Delhi. Mr. I{abib Siddiqui, Adv. for complainant with SI Anil Kumar, P.S. Gokulpuri. Through: CORAM: IION'I}LE MR. JT]STICE SANJIV KHANNA ORDER 17.08.2010 Rcspondcnt No.2 Ms. Sarnreen is prcsent in person. Let her statemcnt be rccorclcd on oetth. I havc heard the statement made by the respondent No.2. I havc also exarnined the MLC of respondent N0.2. I'he MLC as such does not show any serious injury. "I'he respondent No.2 rvas hor.vever referred to neurologist O.P.D. I{espondent No.2 has stated that shc is not suffered any head injury and has not takcn any treattncnt for head injury. Looking at the nature of thc disputes, the allegations made in the FIR and the MLC, I arn satisfied that it is in the intercst of justice to quash the FIR. No useful purpose r.vill bc served in continuing with thc flirther investigation in the FII{. Till today the charge sheet has not bccn filed. The petition is accordingly allorved and Irllt No.1 1212010 under Scction 32313411506/34 of the Indian Penal Cocle Policc Sttrtion Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified .a) // t !r t ?L - Yatltutta Vihar/Gokalpuri, Delhi is quashed and the resultant proceedings ernanating therefi orn are hereby set aside. Dasti. I 1-)/ .- /- Il SANJIV KIIANNA. J. AUGUST I7,2OIO 'I! { e {