IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3983 of 2010 INDRA BHUSHAN SINGH @ INDU BHUSHAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR 3 30.03.2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for offence under sections 409/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not named in the FIR, rather executant, Junior engineer, Mukhia and others have been named therein. He further submits that in fact executant filed misc. case that he has done work in excess of the sanctioned amount. However, the District Magistrate found that work has not been completed as per specification, as such, direction for lodging of the case was given by him. The only allegation against the petitioner is that he prepared the revised estimate of the work. Petitioner further submits that he was posted as Junior engineer for a short period when occurrence took place and presently he is in Jharkhand State services and he came to know about lodging of the FIR when police reached his native place at Paliganj in course of enquiry. Some of the named co accused have already been allowed anticipatory bail. In the facts of the case, the petitioner as above is directed to be released on bail in case he surrenders within six weeks on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Barbigha Police Station case no. 233 of 2002 from the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura. - 2 - Petitioner will co-operate with the trial and abstain from taking unnecessary adjournments, otherwise the learned court in seisin of the case would be at liberty to cancel his bail bond and taken him into custody. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)