:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 63 OF 2008 Mr.Vinayak Chandrakant More ....Appellant V/s. Ms.Aparna Vinayak More ....Respondent ====== Shri Hitesh Vyas, Adv. for the Appellants. Aparna More present in person. CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI, AND SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATED: 30TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. Learned Counsel for the Appellant, states that Appellant and the Respondent have settled all their disputes and they want to file Consent Terms in this court. Appellant Vinayak Chandrakant More is present in the court. He confirms this fact. Respondent Aparna Vinayak More is also present in the court. She has not engaged any lawyer. However, she states that she has settled all the disputes with the Appellant-husband. :2: :2: :2: 2. Consent Terms duly signed by the parties and the Lawyer of the Appellant are taken on record and marked ‘X’. Order in terms of the consent terms. The Undertakings contained in the consent Terms are accepted by this court. Four Demand Drafts each in the sum of Rs.45,000/- and one in the sum of Rs.20,000/- drawn in the name of Aparna Kanse, i.e. respondent-Aparna More are tendered in the court. They are handed over to respondent, Aparna More who is present in the court. She has tendered a receipt in this court which is taken on record and marked ‘Y’. In the receipt, she has acknowledged the fact that she has received her 9 Tolas of Gold from the appellant. 3. Family Court Appeal stands disposed off in terms of the Consent Terms. sd/- sd/- (SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J)