1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO.111 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.575 OF 1989 Bajirao s/o Hariba Sangale, since deceased, through L.Rs. & others Petitioners Versus Dnyandeo (Giyandeo) s/o Govindrao Pawar and others Respondents Mr.R.P.Dhase, advocate for review petitioners. CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 17th March, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Heard learned Counsel for review petitioner. 2 On perusal of the order passed by this Court, it appears that the Revenue Tribunal has assumed jurisdiction and remitted the matter back to the tenancy authorities. The Revenue Tribunal has also committed an error in directing the tenancy authorities to ascertain, whether revision petitioner before the Revenue Tribunal is a protected tenant over disputed land. 3 It is to be noted that this Court has observed in the impugned 2 order that proceedings before the Tahsildar were not in respect of ascertaining tenancy rights of either of the parties. In fact, proceedings ought not to have been entertained by the Revenue Tribunal and more so, there is no question of issuing direction in respect of investigating claim of revision petitioner before the Revenue Tribunal as regards his tenancy rights. 4 In this view of the matter, there is no ground to cause interference in exercise of review jurisdiction. Review Petition is devoid of substance. 5 Hence, Review Application stands rejected. ( R. M. BORDE) JUDGE adb/rp11107