IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.7075 of 2008 Decided on : September 3, 2013 Smt. Kanta Devi …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Ms Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. R.S. Verma, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. A.G. for R-1 to 3. Sanjay Karol, J (oral) CMP No.15555/2013 & CMP No.11300/2013 For the reasons set out in the application, delay in filing the application for restoration of the Writ Petition, which in my considered view, has sufficiently been explained, is condoned. The application for restoration being CMP No.15555/2013 is allowed and order dated 9.11.2010 is recalled. The petition is restored to its original number and position. Applications stand disposed of. CWP(T) No.7075 of 2008 It is seen that in the response, respondents have clarified that petitioner’s case for regularization as Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Beldar/Helper shall be considered from the date of her entitlement. 2. Ms. Archana Dutt learned counsel submits that persons junior to the petitioner stand appointed as Complaint Attendant. Under these circumstances, petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with law if not already considered. Needful shall positively be done within a period of three months from today, after affording due and adequate opportunity of hearing/representation to the petitioner, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, which shall be communicated to the petitioner. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. September 3, 2013 (KS) (Sanjay Karol), J.