[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVN.APPLN.NO.392 OF 2008 Mr.Ganesh Sopanrao Ghule ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Abhaykumar Apte advocate for applicant Mr.S.S.Pednekar A.P.P. for the State Mr.D.M.Gupte Adv.for Respondent no.2 ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant-original accused and the learned advocate for the respondent no.2-original complainant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. By judgment and order dated 16.1.2007 passed in SCC 21907/05, the learned Judicial Magistrate F.C. AC Court, Pune, convicted the applicant under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Appeal preferred by the applicant came to be dismissed, hence, this revision. [-2-] 3. During the pendency of this revision, the learned counsels for both the sides state that matter has been amicably settled between the parties. Affidavit of the complainant to that effect is filed. The learned advocate for the complainant states that in view of the settlement, the matter be compounded and the applicant be acquitted therein. 4. In view of the above, the offence under Section 138 r.w. 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act is compounded and the applicant is acquitted thereunder. Bail bonds shall stand cancelled. 5. Revision application is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]