IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 193 of 2009 (S/B) Jagmohan Singh Kafola. .……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. .………. Respondents. Mr. B.S. Negi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for the respondents. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that since the petitioner had joined at Rudraprayag in furtherance of the impugned transfer order dated 10.09.2009, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. He accordingly prays that the same be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 15.06.2010 15.06.2010 G