^^^^^.- ^ ^^" e^i^^ .^-•" V-- IN THE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT: BILASPUR W.P.CQNo. -1603 QF 2011 ^' PETITIONER: Anurag Shrivas, aged 28 years, son of Shri Shyam Narayan Shrivas, resident of Rest-House Road, Pendraroad, district Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPOMDENT: The District Collector, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 2ass». ff 'i-W!^ K> UIGHCOURTOEaiHAmSGARH: BIL^PUR WRIT RETITION (Q N0.1603 OF M11 PETlTtQNER RESPONDENT AnuragShrivas Vereus TheDistrictColtector, Blaspur. (Writ Petitton under ArBcte 226 of the Constihrtionof India) Single Bench •.Hon'bteShriSatish K. ^nihotoi, J. l<WM1»*h^»<—>MW»w<* KIN»»N»fWS<»11 Pf^ent:- Shri Somriath Srerma,Adwcatefc»thep Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panet Lawyer for the State. «wh»fltl1»a^il*NUttfh*<NBI**<*»»J*<^l>»^»'il***1KlN^' iMaih»—lt!>l^^Nri^1f««nW ri***<» : ORDERdR^U . . , (Passedonthis05uldayofJuly,2011) 1) The grievance of ttie peUUoner, in tWs paUUon, isttiat on tt complaint made by ttie prtitioner, a roport was called for l^ ttie CoUeetor.aThe AdditionalCollector,subroitle<ahlsreportdated 10/122010 (Annexure P^.Thereafter,i ac1)onhas^ In accordance wiUi law. ; ^ 2) Shri Bh^dyri, teamed Panel Lawyer aRpeanng for the District Ooltector submits thatthe petition is not maintainabte, asfte other two parsons, againstwhom Uierejs a reference in the report, have not beenr impleaded as partyrespondente. ; 3) Be that as it may; since the case is not ripe at ttite stage tor indulgenoe of this Court, thus, the petition is dismissed. Mowever, sirw&the repwt is pending befpre the Cpllertor, Bilaspur: the CotlectoT, plaspur is di»ectect to look into the report and after ^fording an opportunity of hearingt& all the concerned (arties pass anorder, in accordance witti law, on ilsown persgecHye, as early as po^ibte, preferably Mnthin a Rwiod of ei^it weeteJFromthe date ofrecejptofacogyofthte order. • a^iok