IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petitoion No. 1012 of 2008 Rakesh Kumar S/o Sandal Singh ........... Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ......... Respondents Mr. Sidhartha Sah, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Sidhartha Sah, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nandan Arya, A.G.A. for the State. 2. Learned A.G.A. for the State submits before this Court that it has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is a prima-facie case against the present petitioner, and as such the police has submitted the chargesheet before the Addl. S.P. concerned. It was further submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioner seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him has, now, become infructuous. As such, the police is likely to submit the chargesheet before the competent court in the near future. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. However, interim order dated 21.01.2009 shall remain operative till the chargesheet is filed the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 26.02.2009 LSR