WPSS 135/2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Sri Anurag Bisaria, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri R.C. Arya, the learned standing counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri B.S. Adhikari, the learned counsel for respondent no. 4. The petitioner has questioned the transfer order and the consequential relieving order by which the petitioner has been transferred from Doiwala to Kashipur in the Cane Cooperative Society. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the year 2008 the petitioner was suspended, which was revoked in June, 2010 after the petitioner’s writ petition was allowed. Subsequently, in January, 2011 the petitioner filed two writ petitions questioning the promotion issued by the Department, which posts were required to be filled up through the Public Service Commission. The petitioner contends that in view of the aforesaid, the respondent no. 5 held a grudge against him and consequently the transfer order was passed malafidely. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court finds that no grudge or malafide intention becomes apparent against the respondent no. 5. The transfer orders have been passed on administrative grounds, which is not malafide and therefore not liable to be interfered. This Court apparently has been informed that the petitioner is on a transferable post and has remained in Doiwala since the year 2006. In view of the aforesaid, since no malafide could be spelt out against the respondent no. 5, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the transfer order at this stage. The writ petition is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 22-02-2011 SP