(1) wp8744-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8744 OF 2011 Ganesh Vitthalrao Ingle PETITIONER VERSUS Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Mumbai and others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. B.N. Magar, advocate for the Petitioner. ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 22nd NOVEMBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. The petitioner challenges the order of the Grievance Committee thereby rejecting the complaint of the present petitioner. 2. The petitioner as well as respondent No. 3 were competing for the dealership to be issued by the Respondent No. 1 at Hasnabad, Tq. Bhokardan. It is the contention of the petitioner that the respondent No. 3 though is charged with a serious criminal offence, he has suppressed about the same and a grievance in that regard has been rejected by the Respondent No. 2. (2) wp8744-11 3. The perusal of Clause 5 of the advertisement would reveal that the requirement sought for disqualification of a candidate is as to whether the candidate is convicted for any criminal offence involving moral turpitude or economic offence. Admittedly, the Respondent No. 3 is not yet convicted. In that view of the matter, it cannot be said that he has suppressed any material. Hence, the writ petition is rejected. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] npj/wp8744-11