Civil Revision No. 3550 of 2010(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3550 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: May 25 , 2010 Hem Raj ...... Petitioner Versus Sumit Kumar and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Harish Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against the order of the Appellate Court allowing the appeal of the respondents against the interim order granted by the trial Court. The petitioner had filed a civil suit claiming that he and the respondents were co-sharers of property in dispute and praying for an injunction restraining the respondents from making any construction or creating any interest in the said property without getting the same partitioned. The respondents had claimed that the property had in fact stood partitioned as far back as 1955 and had placed a document alleged to be a memorandum of partition in respect thereof. The learned Appellate Court after noticing this document observed that any alienation which may Civil Revision No. 3550 of 2010(O&M) 2 be made would be subject to lis pendens and on the strength of the document mentioned above declined the relief of restraining them from making any construction. After arguing for sometime learned counsel states that he would be satisfied if it is clarified that any construction which may be made by the respondents would be at their risk and cost and would not be entitled to claim any costs incurred on the basis thereof. I find this to be a reasonable request. Consequently this revision petition is disposed of with the additional direction as prayed for. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE May 25, 2010 sunita