1 Cri-A-67-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 67 OF 2011 Gulnaaz Mohammed Zahid Shaikh ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Rajendra Rathod i/b. Mr. D.A.Siddiqui, Advocate, for the applicant. Ms. A.T.Javeri, APP, for the respondent - State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 1st February, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant 2. The applicant is wife of respondent No.2,who was granted anticipatory bail by the Sessions Court, Mumbai, in Crime No.431/2010 under Sections 498A, 406, 342, 323, 504,506 read with Sec. 34 of IPC. Firstly the applicant had lodged a report with Panvel Police Station on 6.12.2010 and as Panvel Police Station did not have jurisdiction, she filed second report at Nagpada Police Station on 14.12.2010 and offence came to be registered. According to her, she was ill-treated and beaten on account of demand of money 2 Cri-A-67-11.sxw and she was not allowed to take away her Stridhan. The learned Sessions Court, while granting anticipatory bail noted that on 15.12.2010, the complainant had been to the house of the accused along with police and at that time, entire Stridhan articles, including 17 tolas gold ornaments, were seized under a panchnama and at that time she had not disclosed that any other Stridhan articles were still remaining. The learned Sessions Court noted that she had left the house of husband three months after the marriage, which had taken place on 17.4.2010 3. Taking into consideration the reasons given by the Sessions Court, I do not find any justification to cancel the anticipatory bail. Therefore, the application stands rejected. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)