1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION MO. 85 OF 2010 Purushottam Tukaram Tidke Vs. D. G. Raje, Deputy Charity Commissioner, Nagpur. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Amol Maridkar Adv for appellant. Mr. A. M. Ghare Adv for respondent. CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL J. DATED: 19 th JULY, 2010. Heard extensively. The contempt petitioner desires to approach the learned Joint Charity Commissioner Nagpur to agitate his grievance about change in Schedule I of the Trust. Without adverting to merits in the matter, it is between the petitioner and the learned Joint Charity Commissioner to do in the legal frame. For the present in the light or order dated 23rd November 2009, reading clauses 2 and 3 in juxtaposition, I find 2 there is no deliberate disobedience of order of concerned authority, consequently contempt petition disposed of. Respondent discharged. JUDGE svk