IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:04.08.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.2330 of 2007 in O.A.No.1030 of 2001 V.Senthil Kumar ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner Tanjore Municipality Tanjore. 2. The Director Municipal Administration Ezhilagam, Chepauk Chennai-600 005. ... Respondents Prayer: Original Application No.1030 of 2001 filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, on abolition, transferred to the file of this Court and renumbered as Writ Petition No.2330 of 2007, seeking for a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to regularise the services of the Applicant from the date of initial appointment i.e.01.07.1997, if he had completed 240 days of continuous service under the first respondent Municipality. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi For First Respondent : Mr.P.I.Thirumoorthy For Second Respondent : Mr.V.Arun Additional Govt.Pleader. O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2.At this stage of hearing of the Writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the petitioner is permitted to make representation to the first respondent, with regard to reliefs sought for in the Writ Petition and if the first respondent is directed to consider the representation, in view of G.O.(MS) No.21, Municipal Administration https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and Water Supply (MC.3) Department, dated 23.02.2006 and G.O.Ms.No.22, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (F) Department, dated 28.02.2006, relating to regularization of the services of the daily wage employees of Municipalities, in the state of Tamil Nadu and pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. It is further submitted that the petitioner is still in service under the first respondent Municipality and therefore, the above mentioned Government orders would be applicable to the petitioner. 3. The learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents have no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the first respondent, with regard to the reliefs sought for by the petitioner, in the present Writ Petition, within 15 days from today, and on receipt of such representation, the first respondent is directed to dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, in view of the Government orders in G.O.Ms. No.21, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (MC.3) Department, dated 23.02.2006 and G.O.Ms.No.22, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (F) Department, dated 28.02.2006, within eight weeks thereafter, if it is found that the petitioner has been in continuous service, as stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner. With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Asst. Registrar / True Copy / Sub.Asst Registrar ssn/arr To 1.The Commissioner Tanjore Municipality Tanjore. 2.The Director Municipal Administration Ezhilagam, Chepauk,Chennai-600 005. + 1 cc to Government Pleader,SR.35733 Writ Petition No.2330 of 2007 PKB(CO) EM/7.8.09 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/