IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 23460 of 2010 Date of decision : 10.01.2011 Teka ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Anil Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) The pointed grievance of the petitioner is that although, he made representation (Annexure P-3) relatable to impugned resolution (Annexure P-2) to the District Commissioner, Kaithal, but no action has yet been taken on it. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and going through the record, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.3 to decide the representation (Anneuxre P-3) and the validity or otherwise of the impugned resolution (Annexure P-2) and pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge January 10, 2011 naresh.k