Criminal Revision No.1861 of 2011 (O&M) :{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 08, 2011 Jeetu Ram .....Petitioner VERSUS Vikramjit and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Paramjit Singh Jammu, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has filed this revision petition against the order of acquittal of respondents under Section 306 IPC. The Appellate Court has relied upon a judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court reported as Gangula Mohan Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, 2010 (1) Recent Criminal Reports 603, which applies to the facts of the present case. The deceased was working as a servant with the respondents and was levelled with the allegation of committing theft. He had committed suicide. The Supreme Criminal Revision No.1861 of 2011 (O&M) :{ 2 }: Court under similar circumstances found that no case of abetment would be made out. Moreover, it has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme in Bhim Singh Vs. State of Haryana, 2002(10) SCC 461 that even if some other view is possible, that would not be a ground to interfere in the order of acquittal. No case for interference in the order of acquittal, thus, is made out. Dismissed. November 08, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE