IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI BILAL NAZKI, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 10070 of 2005 Between: C. Kesavulu S/o. C. Gurappa, Hindu House No.87, Giddangi Street, Tirupathi, Chittoor District, A.P. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Health Secretary, Rep. by Ministry of Health, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Secretary, Medical Council of India, New Delhi. 3 The Principal , S.V. Medical College, Tirupathi, Chittoor District, A.P. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus not to withdraw doctors deputed in March 2005 of 3rd Respondent colleges who are transferred from Osmania, Gandhi, and Siddharadha Medical Colleges under the instructions from 1st Respondent to meet the requirements of MCI inspection and they should be retained permanently in public interest as well to maintain the high standards of Medical Education and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case,. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.U.RAMANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FAMI.WELFARE Counsel for Respondent No.2:Mr.S.Niranjan Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.3:Mr.S.V.Muni Reddy The Court at the stage of admission made the following : O R D E R (Per the Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, ACJ) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The prayer in this writ petition is: “It is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus not to withdraw doctors deputed in March 2005 of third respondent colleges who are transferred from Osmania, Gandhi and Siddharadha Medical Colleges under the instructions from 1st respondent to meet the requirements of MCI inspection and they should be retained permanently in public interest as well to maintain the high standards of medical education and pass such other order or orders.” It appears that only to protect the interest of the third respondent, this writ petition has been filed and is not in public interest. The writ petition is misconceived, which is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ (Bilal Nazki, ACJ) 28th April, 2005. _________________ (Dr.G.Yethirajulu,J) vrn To 1 The Health Secretary, Ministry of Health, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Secretary, Medical Council of India, New Delhi, 3 The Principal, S.V.Medical College, Tirupathi, Chittoor District, A.P. 4 Two C.Cs to the Government Pleader for Medical, Health and Family Welfare, High Court Buildings, A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 5 Two C.D copies.