bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.252 OF 2009 Ashok M.Warange & Anr. ..Petitioners Vs. The Ajara Urban Co.op.Bank Ltd. & Anr. ..Respondents None for the parties. CORAM :­ V.C.DAGA & A.A.SAYED,JJ. DATE : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2009 P.C. 1. None for the petitioner even at second call. Perused petition. 2. This petition was filed on 17th October, 2008. The petitioner has not bothered even to get the matter circulated so as to seek appropriate orders. 3. The petitioner is challenging the order of attachment dated 3rd February, 2006 and 26th December, 2006. There is a delay of almost more than two years in filing the petition from the date of order. By this time, the petition must have been rendered infructuous. Even otherwise, the petitioner has alternate remedy. 4. The petitioner has not demonstrated as to how the petition does not suffer from delay and latches and why the alternate remedy was not efficacious one. In addition to this, he was also expected to serve the petition to the respondents. Under these circumstances, we have no option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. Hence, order accordingly. (A.A.SAYED,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)