IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP. No. 942 of 2009. Date of Decision: 23.8.2010. _______________________________________________ Sanjeev Kumar. ….Petitioner. Versus. State of H.P. and others. ….Respondents. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. Whether approved for reporting1? For the appellant. : Ms.Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Advocate with Ms.Aruna Sharma, Advocate. For Respondents. : Mr.Romesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. Dev Darshan Sud, J.(Oral). Petitioner challenges order (Annexure:P-7) relieving him from the post held by him to be transferred to another place vide Annexure:P-6. A number of grounds have been urged by the petitioner challenging the order. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner places reliance on a decision of this Court in CWP 3652 of 2009 decided on 12th May, 2010. I have gone through the decision. This petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction that Director of Education, H.P.-respondent No. 2 Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment?. 2 will examine the case afresh to see as to whether the petitioner can be adjusted at Paprola, Government Senior Secondary School without disturbing respondent No.4 or any other school in or near Paprola where he can work. Such decision shall be taken within a period of two weeks from today from the date when this order is first presented before respondent No.2. The petitioner shall be granted opportunity of being heard in case so desired. The petition is disposed of. (Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. August 23, 2010(R)