IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25236-2011 (O&M) Date of decision:24.08.2011. Rattan Lal ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for grant of pre-arrest bail in a case registered vide FIR No.315 dated 17.05.2011, under Section 420 and 34 IPC at Police Station City Jind, District Jind. The allegations are that the petitioner along with two others came to the house of the complainant and took him into confidence that they can arrange employment for two persons in Delhi Police and Railway Police respectively against a sum of `20,00,000/-. It is alleged that the complainant had paid `5,00,000/- to the petitioner who had come to his house. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the learned Court below has dismissed the bail application only on the ground that the cheques issued by Sourav Jain, son of the petitioner, have been dishonoured, whereas he had nothing to do with his business. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record from which I have found that there is allegation against the petitioner that he has been paid `5,00,000/- which has not been recovered so far, therefore, the alleged business transaction of Sourav Jain with the complainant is inconsequential. In view thereof, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. August 24, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE