1 wp1199.11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1199 of 2011 Bank of Baroda & ors. ...Petitioner v/s. State of Maharashtra & anr. ...Respondents Mr. S.K. Talsania i/b. M/s. Sanjay Udeshi & co. for the petitioners Mr. Dhanashree Tapkire i/b. Lata Desai for respondent no.2. Mr. D.R. More-APP for the State. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 29th July, 2011 PC: The facts in the present case are identical to the facts in the case of ICICI Bank Ltd. & ors. v/s. State of Maharashtra & anr. 2010 III CLR 725 and in the case of M/s. Tops Security Ltd. & anr. v/s. S.P. Aspingekar in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1773/2009 decided on 3rd May, 2010. Paragraph 14 of the order reads thus: “In that view of the matter, the petition insofar as the petitioner no.1 fails and is dismissed and the rule shall stand discharged as against the petitioner no.1. Insofar as the petitioner no.2 is concerned, the rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).” 2. In view of the view taken by me in the aforesaid case, criminal proceedings except the accused no.1 would not be maintainable in law. 3. In that view of the matter, the complaint except the accused no. 1 deserves to be dismissed. It is, therefore, directed that the complaint except the 2 wp1199.11.sxw accused no.1 shall stand dismissed and the rest of the accused shall stand discharged. 4. Needless to state that the complaint be proceeded in accordance with law insofar as accused no.1 is concerned. (B.R. GAVAI, J)