IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1665 of 2009 Dipak Kumar Jha S/O Sri Surya Kant Jha R/Ovill Bhabhangama, P.S.Riga, Distt- Sitamarhi. …….Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ………Opposite Party ----------- 2. 25.11.2011 The accused petitioner has preferred this revision application against the order dated 21.07.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.VII, Sitamarhi in Sessions Trial No.47/2009/60/2009 by which the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 228 of the Cr.P.C. has been dismissed. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner had no intention to kill the injured and the injury has not been found to be grievous. Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State submits that it appears that intention of the petitioner was to kill the injured and due to intervention of the co- villagers, she could be saved. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as also on 2 perusal of the impugned order, it appears that learned trial court has considered the contention of both the parties and has found that the petitioner had intention to kill the injured and due to the intervention of the co-villagers, she could be saved. Considering the facts and circumstance stated above, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)