IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8301 of 1989 (O&M) Date of Decision:12.12.2011 Tika Ram c/o CITU, 2/7, Gopi Colony, Old Faridabad. ... Petitioner Versus Presiding Officer, Indl. Tribunal, Faridabad and another. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Mittal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** 1.Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? NO 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) 1. On the previous date of hearing i.e. 30.09.2011, it was represented by the counsel for the 2nd respondent that the petitioner had died and his wife received compensation and given in writing that she would not pursue the writ petition. An application had been filed and copy of which had been served to the petitioner's counsel to secure instructions about the alleged settlement. The petitioner has not filed any objection. 2. The writ petition is dismissed in terms of the settlement referred to by the counsel for the 2nd respondent. DECEMBER 12, 2011 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE