IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL C – 482 No. 892 of 2009 Raja Ram and others ……….. Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand and another ………….Respondents Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, AGA for the respondent no.1. Dated: November 25, 2009 Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. (By the Court) Heard Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the applicants. Petitioners by way of this petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C., are assailing summoning order dated 06.04.2007 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Laksar District Haridwar, whereby learned Magistrate has summoned the petitioners under section 498A, 504,506 I.P.C. The Scope of Article 226 of the Constitution of India or scope of Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure is limited. While exercising powers in either of the provisions, Court is not supposed to enter into the question of fact or appreciation of evidence. The only thing which is required to be seen by the Court is as to whether contents of the complaint, statement recorded under section 200/202 Cr.P.C. and material produced before the Magistrate make out any prima facie case or not. Having perused the record I find while passing the summoning order learned Magistrate has taken into consideration statement recorded under section 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. and documents produced before him. No perversity or illegality is committed by learned Magistrate while passing the impugned order. I agree with the view taken by learned Magistrate. I have perused the impugned order and material available on record. I find prima facie case is made out to summon the accused. No interference is called for in impugned order passed in Criminal Complaint Case no.144/2007. The Petition is dismissed accordingly. (Alok Singh, J.) 25.11.2009 JKJ