1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 225 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 840 OF 2007 Dilip Suganchand Bhandari........Appellants versus Maharashtra Rajya Shakari Krushi & Gramin Vikas Bank & ors........ Respondents. Mr. P.P. Chavan i/b V.M. Bhate for the Appellants Mr. S.C. Mangale h/f Rakesh R.Bhatkar for the respondents CORAM: RANJIT V. MORE, J. DATED : 20th OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Chavan learned counsel for the appellant. The appellant is the original Plaintiff and respondents are original defendant. Appellant filed Regular Civil Suit No. 15/00 for declaration that the recovery proceedings started is illegal and further prayed for injunction from auctioning the land. The trial court dismissed the suit and the appellant's appeal before the lower appellate court was also came to be dismissed by the judgment and order which is impugned in the present Second Appeal. There is no dispute that the appellant purchased a tractor by availing loan facility. There is also no dispute that the entire loan is not repaid and therefore the respondent 2 constrained to initiate action under sec. 101 of the Co-operative Scoeties Act. The appellant's case is that respondent fradulently induced him to make loan proposal for tractor is not believed by both the lower courts below. No question of law much less substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed. 3. In view of the dismissal of the second appeal, Civil application does not survive and the same is also dismissed. (R.V. More, J.)