IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3415 of 2011 SUDHIR KUMAR @ SUDHIR PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH VIG with Cr.Misc. No.6833 of 2011 TRILOKESHWAR PRASAD @ MILOKESHWAR PRASAD & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH VIG with Cr.Misc. No.6434 of 2011 TRIBHUWAN PRASAD SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH VIG ----------- 2. 11.03.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477, 511, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that though the accusation has been levelled for defalcation of Rs.65,85,864/-in repair work of the Road Bridge but the petitioners have already retired from the services several years back. It is submitted by senior counsel for the Vigilance that the F. I. R. was 2 lodged in pursuant to the direction given by this Hon’ble Court in L.P.A. and without allocation of fund repair work was undertaken by the petitioners. It is also submitted by senior counsel for the petitioners that the Superintending Engineer, namely, Bhola Nath Puran, who sanctioned the estimate, has already been granted anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 36967 of 2010 by this court. Considering the fact that other accused has been granted anticipatory bail and the fact that the petitioners have already retired from the services, let the petitioners, Sudhir Kumar @ Sudhir Prasad, Trilokeshwar Prasad @ Milokeshwar Prasad, Sitapati Sharan and Tribhuwan Prasad Sinha be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Vigilance Case No. 50 of 2010, Special Case No. 18 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 3 the learned Special Judge, Vigilance-II, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)