IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2008 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 35424 of 2008(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- DAISY K.L., HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT, V.R.A.M.M.H.S. THAIKKAD (SOUTH), THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.M.K.DILEEP KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, COLLECTORATE, AYYANTHOLE (PO), THRISSUR DIST. 2. THE HEADMASTER, V.R.A.M.M.H.S. THAIKAD SOUTH, BRAHMAKULAM (PO), THRISSUR DT. 3. GRACY T.P., HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT, V.R.A. M.M.H.S., THAIKAD SOUTH, (PO) BRAHMAKULAM, THRISSUR DT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.35424/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner arises out of Ext.P1 staff fixation wherein petitioner was included among the protected teachers. Aggrieved by Ext.P1, the petitioner has approached the first respondent by filing Ext.P2 appeal. During its pendency, Ext.P3 order has been issued implementing Ext.P1. It is in this background the writ petition has been filed mainly aggrieved by Exts.P1 and P3. Now that the appeal filed by the petitioner against Ext.P1 is pending consideration of the first respondent, it is appropriate that the first respondent takes a decision on Ext.P2 with notice to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. 2 Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment alog with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 3