1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.6247/2010 Jagdish Vs. State Date of order : 19/7/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma for the petitioner. Shri Amit Punia, P.P. for the State. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no case pending against the petitioner and that he was made accused along with certain other co-accused for offence u/s.399, 402, 379, 411 IPC and 3/25 of the Arms Act, whereas no recovery was made from him. Petitioner was falsely implicated for the mere reason that co-accused Anil Singh @ Dabbu, who was present there and his brother Sushil, had ongoing dispute with the police. Petitioner was arrested on 11.6.2010. Investigation is almost complete. Challan is likely to be filed. Trial of the case is likely to take long. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and 2 circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Jagdish S/o Yadram shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No.167/2010, P.S. Kherli, Distt. Alwar for offence u/s.399, 402, 379, 411 of IPC and 3/25 of Arms Act on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. However, in case the petitioner is found indulged in any offence at any point of time, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled on this ground alone, at the instance of prosecution. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/