HIGH COURT OF CHHAWI$GARH: E§M$PUR Writ Petition g3! No. 2344 of 209g 3L. Kesharwani. 3/0. Late Shri LP. Keshatwani, aged abaut 68 years‘ Reid. Prof. a? Zagicgy, Rm. 13, Nir-aEa Nagay, Biiaspur (CG). Versus Respondents ’g) State of Chhattisgam, through Secreiary. Department of Higher Educaticn, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mamraiay, Raipur (CG). 2) Commissioner, Higher Education, Raipur (CG), 3} Governing Body/Managmg Cammittee, CJVLD CDEEnm Rimpur (9G). 4) The Principal, C.M.D. PG Colrege, Biiaspur (CG). Petitioner (Writ Petitirm under Article 226 of the Constitutian of indie.) ‘SB: Hon’bie Mr. garish K. Agnihotri, J. Presem. Shri Rayendra Tripathi, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Raieev Shrivastava, counsei for the respondents N0. 3 am 4. ORAL GRDER (Passed on 3‘“ day 9f July, 209$) The petitioner, who was working an the post of Professcr in CMD. Coiiege, Biiaspur, has filed this oetitlon for grant of benefit of ieave encae‘nment on the ground that the employees of private colleges are entitied to get the benefit of leave 6ncaShmem. 2} Learneo counsel appearing for the respondents No. 3 and 4 submits that the case of the petitioner ehaii be considered in accordance with the ratio iaio' down by the Hon’bie Supreme Court in the matter of State of Rajasthan & another Vs. Senior Higher Secondary $chool, Lachhmangarh & othere ( 2006 (’iO} SCC. 345), wiihin a period of six weeks. 3) in view of the above, nothing survives in the matter. 4) The petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costar. Sd/- Satisrh K. Agnihntri judge e kin.