IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 372 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- NATVERLAL BECHARBHAI PATEL Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 372 of 1997 MR TUSHAR MEHTA for Petitioner No. 1 MR HARIN P RAVAL for Respondent No. 1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 2,5-6,8 .......... for Respondent No. 3-4 MR KS JHAVERI for Respondent No. 7 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL Date of decision: 24/10/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.Zaveri, Ld.counsel for the respondent No.7 states that the main petition is against the election of the Market Committee and the term of the said Market Committee is also over and subsequently the said Market Committee is bifurcated into two and therefore he states that the term in any case is over and hence the dispute raised in the petition becomes only academic and the petition in reality has become infructuous. 2. In view of the above statement, this petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Liberty to parties in case of difficulty is granted. Rule is discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. 24.10.02 (JAYANT PATEL,J)