1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.01.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Writ Appeal (MD)No.105 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 A 1807 Silamalai Primry Agricultural Cooperative Bank, rep.by the Special Officer, Silamalai, Chillamarathupatti-via, Bodinayakanur, Theni District. : Appellant/Petitioner Vs. 1.The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Sub-Regional Office, Madurai. 2.The Enforcement Officer/Recovery Officer, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Madurai. : Respondents/Respondents Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order of the learned Single Judge, dated 06.01.2011, made in M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 in W.P.(MD)No.209 of 2011. M.P(MD)No.1/11 in WP.209/11:- Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to issue an order of INTERIM STAY against the notice of the second Respondent in No.TN/MDU/24561/RECY/2008472/circle 13/2008 dated 31-03-2008/17-06-2008 and the order of the second Respondent in No.M3/TN/MDU/24561/Recy/RO/2010 dated 23-09-2010 pending disposal of the above WP(MD)No.209 of 2011. W.P.209/11:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Certiorari calling for the notice of the second respondent in No. TN/MDU/24561/RECY/2008472/circle 13/2008 dt.31- 03-2008/17-06-2008 and the order of the second Respondent in No.M3/TN/ MDU/24561/Recy/RO/2010 dt. 23-09-2010 and quash the same. For Appellant : Mr.V.O.S.Kalaiselvam JUDMGNET [Judgment of the Court was delivered BY N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, J] This writ appeal is filed against the interim order passed by the learned Single Judge at the stage of admission of the writ petition, which is a discretionary order. If the appellant/petitioner is facing any difficulty in complying with the conditional order of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 learned Single Judge, it is very much open to the appellant to approach the learned Single Judge pointing out the difficulties. The order impugned being an interim order, no appeal is maintainable. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. Connected M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 is also dismissed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (L.A) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To: 1.The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Sub-Regional Office, Madurai. 2.The Enforcement Officer/Recovery Officer, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Madurai. + 1 cc to Mr.V.O.S.Kalaiselvam, Advocate, SR No.3506 JUDGMENT IN W.A.(MD)No.105/2011 and MP(MD)No.1/2011 Dated:28.01.2011 gb RJ/10.2.11 2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/