-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3150 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO.3150 OF 2003 APPLICATION NO.3150 OF 2003 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.1223 OF 2003 APPEAL NO.1223 OF 2003 APPEAL NO.1223 OF 2003 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.S.R.Singh for the Applicant Ms G.S.Roychoudhary i/b M/s.Mulla and Mulla and C.B.C. for Respondent No.10. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JANUARY 29,2007. : JANUARY 29,2007. : JANUARY 29,2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned Advocate for the 10th Respondent. The learned Advocate for the 10th Respondent states that the said Respondent has deposited the compensation amount of Rs.75,000/- with interest thereon as directed by the Tribunal. 2. The Tribunal has held that the original opponent Nos.1 and 2 (Respondent Nos.7 and 8 herein) are liable to pay Rs.60,000/- with interest thereon at the rate of 6% p.a. from January 1999. The Applicant was held liable to pay the said -2- amount to the claimants and liberty has been granted to the Applicant to recover the said amount from the original opposite party Nos.1 and 2 by executing the Award. 3. In view of the aforesaid liberty granted by the Tribunal, no case is made out for grant of stay. Application for stay is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE