IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 14373 of 1996 Between: Enuganti Ranga Rao S/o Surya Rao r/o Jagannadhapuram Village, Mulakalapally Mandal, Khammam Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Joint Collector, Khammam Khammam Dist. 2 Revenue Divisional Officer, Paloncha, Khammam District. 3 Mandal Revenue Officer Mulakalapally Mandal, Khammam District. 4 D. Sitaramaiah (Dismissed) S/o Venkaiah r/o Jagannadhapuram village, Khammam District. R4- Dismissed for default vide court order dt, 21/6/01. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to To pass appropriate writ or order or direction particularly a writ of mandamus in the nature of direction declaring the orders passed by the 1st respondent herein in Case No. ROR/27/95 dt. 1-3-1996 as illegal, arbitrary and un-constitutional and pass a consequential direction setting aside the same and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.J.PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 14373 OF 1996 ORDER: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 31.7.2008, the writ petition was directed to be posted “for dismissal”. Today though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither is the counsel for the petitioner present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as costs. ___________ 1-8-2008 asp