\ \\\\\\\\c\\;§§éxwm“ L41: J 1n the MAB. $tat¢ mninistrative Tribunal at JgBALPURUx-LF. OFA. 1200 0f 1989 Applicantr BHUMHN LKRA- VarSU S . rin cipal gaspondentsr state of my}. Thmugh/seqretary Mantralaya, m,p, adopal and 52 others. ‘Applica’c ion for ,amendment . me apglicant named above begs to suhnit as unCi er: " 1. Tnat by filing ‘an aplplication U/s 19 of the Administrati v e Tribunals Act, 1935(Act No. 13 of 1985)‘ e ap§,,licant had praygd for pmmotion as Dy. Cbllectoru‘ witn due below sammmw with A/ effgt \Aj.$m\;f®¢ from Jame dgte A~K”\ men AL/wgz hisl °$ L to tim to him. 2. Tn'dt pendinrg dippo Sal of the application thm have been dev-elopments and as such this applicatmn fgr‘ amedment mic‘n is ‘pmposea as under;- mat in para $ of me MAIN m-LICW’QN u/$ 19 gf the “get fellowing may kindly be adaed as Ground No. (big; ‘ and ‘: m K, a i next/junior was promo‘ted y. (b le ctor aloiawith “ other service benefits he is entitled so a‘med fmm tini (i) reSp actively g“ Para 9§h):."'fhat pening disposal of “me MAM APPLICATLN the asyanaent NQJ VIBE its 'rder NO.B-l(20)/9l/2/1,BpL datea 29m of Feoruary 199L1sswd an GRDER/of postingi applicant as*‘w<;mLLECTQR in the JUNmR PAY SCQALE of Rs. 2200-75—2800-100-fégQ00, untii furth er oraiirs wd’likewie viae anather’GEJ‘EK,m+of ‘EVEN NO. d&ted 4-1-1993; we _ apFlican‘t was assigned h m PPGFGBMA SENIDRII‘Y w.e.f., wnexura-A ll 5—11—19g5, anar’wag‘placed him at 31. Nc.92-A, in beWwe 4‘1‘1993 5111111111 511m mgmma, shown -a’c 31. N . 92, and 3mm; , E1C<A. shoWn at Sl- No.93,(i.e. in betwea‘x $1. ms. 92 an 93), but has illagally has been omer& that for the ' intervming period- i.e.' from 5-11‘1936 to l9‘5'l992, ti applicant will not‘ be antizlai to his $alary as Dy. . celled-or, as he has not actually per£oxmed his cuties such, Which is illegM and. arbitxary as it isnone of t fault oflapplicant arm for the incorrect and belatéaf ano actians of Respondent No .1, the alipiicant canrpi ma’ue to suffer, especially when ha is not at fau Tnééfélcme rs are filed as Annexur=s A‘lG & A‘ll‘ V Ann ewra a-lO P A k s en d n n . V h ‘ a t . mmqaiwy W‘Wfxwm *WM ritinker Diwaker WWW ‘ I S.B: Hon’ble Justice Mr, 14-05-2009 Even after issuanc of SPC to the petitioner(s) no representation has been In these circumsta ces, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the etition for non prosecution. etltion is dismissed for non prosecution. However, he petitioner(s) woutd be at liberty to file an applicatl n for restoration of the same if cause still survives. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker i Judge ade. Accordingiy, the