03 ® E smGLE BENCH 7 IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHTTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w.P (S) Mou§kLL€zu¢2011 /, ,PETITIONER: Ramavtar Yadav Aged about 47 years, hm“ S/o Late Shri Ramkhilavi¥l Yadav Posted in the office of Integrated Child, Development Khadgaon, District- Koria, (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Woman & Child Development,D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. ”W Director, Directorate Woman & Child Development Department, Raipur (C.G.) / 3. District Planning Officer, Woman & Child Development, Koria,’C.G. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- @ HIGH C01 JRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BI} ,ASPI JR WRIT PETITION (S) Nov 5416 0f2011 EZV'RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS'HTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Aonilmtri. J. V/W. PETITIONER Ramavtar Yadav. VER SI IS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh 8:: Others. Present: Ms. Meha Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Amn Sac, Govexmnant Advocate fm‘ the State/ respondents‘ 0 R D E R {Passed on 22"Wtember, 2011) Leamed counsel appearing for th‘: petitioner submits that ihe petitioner has approached This Court earlier impugning the transfer order dated 15.07.2011: in W.P.(S) No. 4384/2011 (Rrzmnvtar Yadav v. State 0f Chhattz’sgar (fr Others). The matter was withdrawn with liberty to pursue the represemalion pending before The respondent authorities. 2. According to Me Kumar, the petitioner had made a representation to the Collector also which has not. been decided as yet. However. the District Project Oliicer. Women and Child Development. Koria, who is not the competent authority to decide the representation; has rejected the representation ofthe petitioner vide order dated 05.09.2011. It is the Collector alone who can decide the representation ofthe petitioner. 3. Shri Sao, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that if the representation; as aforestated; is pending consideration before the Collector, the same shall be considered and decided with as expeditiously as possible: preferably within a, period ofthree weeks on its own merits and perspective. 4. In View of the above, according to Ms. Kumar, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. ,///