70# * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.M.C. 2506/2011 VIJAYKOHLI&ORS. Through: versus Petitioner Mr. V.K. Kalra, Advocate with Petitioner in person. STATE & ORS Respondents Through: Mr. C.L. Gupta, APP with SI Veer Sain. Mr. Pradeep Mishra, Advocate Respondent No. 2 with Respondent No. 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUK1V\ GUPTA O R D E R 02.08.2011 CrI. M.A. No. 8976/2011 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to ail just exceptions Crl. M.C. No. 2506/2011 This is a petition for quashingof FIR No. 454/2007 under Sections 498A/406/34IPG registered at PS Subzi Mandi,New Delhi. The Complainant/RespondentNo. 2 Ms. Geeta Kohli is present in person. She slates that the Petitionersasid RespondentNo.2/CoiTiplainanl CRL.M.C.2506/2011 ^ ^ Signing Date:22.08.2024 16:42:42 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified have entered into a Compromise/ In lerr.i^ of the settlement, maniage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2/Complainant has been dissolvedby a decree ofdivorceby mutual consenton 20^*^ July, 2011. As full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the PetitionerNo. 1 has to pay ^3.55 laldis out of which ^'2 lakhs have already been paidto her and ?1.55 laldishavepaid to her today vide pay order No. 113070 dated 28'^ July, 2011 drawn on Axis Bank. She further states that in view of the settlement betM^een the parties, she does not want to pursuethe abovementionedFIRand the proceedingspursuantthereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volitioii and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in coiianuanceof the proceedings,ratherthe same would create further acrimony, between them, it would be m the interest of justice to quash the abovementionedFIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently,FIR No. 454/2007 under Sections 498A/406/34IPC registeredat PS Subzi Mandi, New Delhi..and proceedingspursuantthereto are hereby quashed. Parties, who are identified by their respective counsels, have signed CRL.M.C. 2506/2011 Page 2 of 3 this order sheet in aclaiowledgineii". r.f thei;- statements made before"this Court. The petitionis disposedof. Orderdasti. MUKTA GUPTA, J. AUGUST 02,2011 'vn' 8 0- aM.o - ^\\"S0 0. XihAJU' •A^Ar^rC-^Jh^ CRL.M.C. 2506/2011 Page 3 of3