IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION &( 227) No. 6M; OF 2008 a PETITIONERS . 1. Municipal Council, Birgaon, through cf}? DEFENDANTS V its Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council, Birgaon, Tahshil Dharsiwa, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) J 2- Assistant Engineer, Municipal Council, Birgaon, Tahshil Dharsiwa, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS f 1. Sanjay Agrawal, S/o Ram Prasad PLAINTIFF Agrawal, residen of Purani Basti, Raipur, Tahshil 8L Distt. Raipur (co), / RESPONDENTS/ 2. Dr. DEFENDANTS 3. Ekram Bhai, Councilor, Municipal Council, Birgaon, resident of Rawabhata, near Vyas Talab, Tahshil Dharsiwa, Distt. Raipur (C.G) vy/A‘ [h State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Raipur, Collectorate v Campus, Raipur, Tahshil 8a Distt. Raipur (C.G) Omprakash Dewangan, , Municipal Council, Birgaon, 3B” ' Kw) W7 V i i WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA V RESPONDENT t é HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR K WP. (227) No. 6462/2008 PETITIONERS Municipal Councii Birgaon and another Versus RESPONDENTS Sanjay Agrawal and others hm I 1esf3111: Shm‘ Sanjay K. Agawal, Adv. for the petitioners. Shri S.C. Verma, Adv. for the respondent No. 1. Shri S.R.J. Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer, for the State. O RAL ORDER (21—6—2011) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the suit is pending since 2008 and this‘petition is also pending since 2008 Without there being any inten‘m order in petitioners’ favour. Therefore, it would be expedient to dispose of this petition with a direction to the trial Court to decide the suit within a specified time frame. Prayer is not opposed. Even otherwise, the prayer is fair and reasonable. 8. Therefore, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to decide the suit as early as possible preferably within a period of 9 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. W; — -':~‘Sd/— N. K. Agarwal Judge 9% '