IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6653 of 2008 Date of Decision:30.04.2009 Umed Singh & anr. ...petitioners Versus Meena Kumari & ors. .....respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.Karan Bhardwaj,Advocate for the petitioners **** RAKESH KUMAR GARG J. This is plaintiffs' revision petition challenging the order dated 11.09.2007 and order dated 19.11.2008 passed by Civil Judge(Sr.Divn.) Sonepat and Additional District Judge, Sonepat, respectively, whereby application filed by the plaintiffs for ad interim injunction restraining the defendants/respondents from dispossessing the petitioners and from alienating the land, has been dismissed. Admittedly, the petitioners have filed the suit for declaration that they have become owner by way of adverse possession. This Court in Bhim Singh & Ors. Versus Zile Singh & Ors. 2006(3)RCR Civil 97 and in RSA No.3909 of 2008 titled as "State of Haryana versus Mukesh Kumar & Ors" decided on 17.03.2009 has held that suit filed by the plaintiff on the plea of adverse possession is not maintainable. In view of the aforesaid well settled proposition of law when the suit itself is not maintainable, I find no reason to interfere in the impugned order rejecting the application for ad interim injunction. Dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 30.04.2009 neenu