IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13019 of 2010 ANJU KUMARI, D/O-JAGDISH PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RASHALPUR, POST- JAGAI, P.S.- EKANGARSARA, DISTRICT- NALANDA :-- PETITIONER. Versus 1.THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HOME, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. HOME SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE (C.R.P.F.), GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, BIHAR SECTOR, PATNA 5. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL (ADMINISTRATION), CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, BIHAR SECTOR, PATNA. 6. THE DEPUTY COMMANDANT ADMINISTRATION G.C., CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, BIHAR SECTOR, PATNA. 7. SAVITA KUMARI, DAUGHTER OF SRI CHANDESHWAR PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- TIKAR BIGHA, POST OFFICE- NARAYANPUR, P.S.- TELHARA, DISTRICT- NALANDA :---- RESPONDENTS. ----------- FOR THE PETITIONER : MR. S.M. EHTESHAM, ADVOCATE. FOR THE UNION OF INDIA : MR. SANJAY KUMAR PANDEY, (C.G.C.) ====== 2. 24.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Union of India. 2. Petitioner was an applicant for the post of Constable (G.D.)(Female), Naxal, C.R.P.F. in the O.B.C. category. It is submitted on her behalf that having appeared in the physical and written test she was declared successful and such declaration would appear from the result contained in Annexure-3 to this application. Perusal of Annexure- 3 indicates that the same contains only the name of the petitioner in the O.B.C. category for State of Bihar (Naxal). Having perused Annexure-3 this Court called upon the learned counsel to satisfy the Court about the genuineness of Annexure-3 learned counsel then submitted that the same has been obtained from the internet. Perusal of Annexure-3, however, does not indicate the website from which it has been obtained. In this connection, petitioner has also represented before the I.G., Bihar - 2 - Sector, C.R.P.F., Patna and the representation is dated 30.3.2010 and is contained in Annexure-5 to this application. 3. Let the I.G., C.R.P.F., Bihar Sector, Patna consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 30.3.2010, Annexure-5 as early as possible, in any case within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order along with a fresh copy of the representation dated 30.3.2010. When this order was being dictated counsel for the Union of India on the basis of the instructions received from the Deputy Commandant (Legal) contained in his letter dated 11.8.2010 submitted that the representation of the petitioner addressed to the D.I.G. (Administration) has already been rejected under letter dated 6th April, 2010 on the ground that in the written test petitioner secured only 31 marks even less than the minimum qualifying marks of 33 fixed for O.B.C. category and on that ground she was not called for medical test. While disposing of the representation dated 30.3.2010, Annexure-5 the I.G. may call for a report from the D.I.G. (Administration) and pass appropriate orders on that basis. While dealing with the representation of the petitioner the I.G. is expected to indicate as to how result, Annexure-3 was shown on the website of the C.R.P.F. that petitioner passed the written test, provided Annexure-3 was on the website of the C.R.P.F. 4. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N. Sinha, J.)