IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN MONDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2007 / 18TH PAUSHA 1928 WP(C).No. 33952 of 2006(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ ROY JOSE, KIRAN VILLA, KOPPATHARA, EROOR WEST P.O., TRIPUNITHURA. BY ADV. SMT.S.K.DEVI SRI.SANTHOSH P.ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, (REGISTERING AUTHORITY), MOTOR VEHICLES DEPARTMENT, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER'S OFFICE, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, (ADDL. REGISTERING AUTHORITY), TRIPUNITHURA. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI M.A.FAYAZ. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN,J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.33952 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of January, 2007 JUDGMENT The contention of the petitioner is that Ext.P3 application for registration has been returned orally stating that some alteration has been made to the vehicle. As a matter of fact, there is nothing to indicate that the application is in any way defective. 2. The learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents admits that necessarily Ext.P3 has to be received and dealt with in accordance with law. 3. Heard both sides. 4. In the facts and circumstances, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to receive Ext.P3 and deal with the same in accordance with law, expeditiously and in case there is any objection in registering the -2- W.P.(C).NO.33952/2006 vehicle, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner and the petitioner shall re- submit Ext.P3 application within a period of ten days. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for information and compliance. P.R.RAMAN, Judge. kcv.