IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN FRIDAY, THE 6TH MAY 2011 / 16TH VAISAKHA 1933 WP(C).No. 13067 of 2011(G) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- M.C. RATHEESH, MUTHALAMCHIRA HOUSE, S. KONDAZHY P.O., THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR-680 001. BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.BASANT BALAJI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/05/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs V.K.MOHANAN,J. ----------------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No. 13067 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of May,2011 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, he is an existing operator on the route Thanikudam-Thiruvilwamala with stage carriage KL-8 AF 4880. According to the petitioner, he had preferred Ext.P1 application on 24.6.2010 for reduction of running time. The grievance of the petitioner is that though Ext.P1 was filed on 24.6.2010, no decision as taken on his application which constrained him to approach this Court by filing WP(C) No.22447 of 2010, which was disposed of by this Court by Ext.P2 judgment directing the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders. It is the further grievance of the petitioner that in spite of the direction that contained in Ext.P2, no orders were passed and therefore, he again approached this Court by filing W.P(C) No.249 of 2011 which resulted in Ext.P3 judgment by which this Court directed the respondents to consider the request in Ext.P5 W.P(C)NO.13067 of 2011 :-2-: therein while passing orders pursuant to Ext.P4 judgment therein on the application for revision of time schedule. But, so far, no orders were passed. According to the petitioner, now a timing conference is scheduled to be held on 11.5.2011 and therefore, the respondents may be directed to consider Ext.P1 application. I find no reason to reject the above request, especially in the light of the direction issued by this Court as per Exts.P2 and P3 orders. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to take up Ext.P1 application and following the directions contained in Exts.P2 and P3, dispose of the same after incorporating the petitioner's application in the agenda for the meeting to be scheduled on 11.5.2011 and to pass appropriate orders on merit. V.K.MOHANAN, Judge. MBS/ W.P(C)NO.13067 of 2011 :-3-: