1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.APPA 451 OF 2010. SHYMRAO NARAYAN SAHARE VS RAJU PUNDLIKRAO BORKAR ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S. S. Meshram, Advocate for applicant. Shri C. N. Adgokar, APP for State respondent. CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 19th JULY, 2010. 1. Heard. 2. Perused the application and annexures. 3. It is seen from impugned order that case was dismissed on 17-12-2007. 4. It is seen that in the application, the applicant has alleged that he was arrested in Crime No.415/2007 under Section 384 of I.P.C. r/w Sections 18,25,27,32 (63), 33, 34 & 35A of Bombay Money Lender's Act and was arrested on 17-3-2008. 5. The applicant has not explained as to why he did not appear before the Court on 17-12-2007 to lead evidence. 6. It is also not shown that he was 2 precluded from informing his advocate his inability to attend the Court. 7. It is also not explained as to why the evidence was not led on remaining date i.e. prior to 20-9-2007. 8. In these premises, the applicant has failed to make out a case for granting any indulgence whatsoever. 9. Application has no merit. Same is rejected and the appeal is dismissed. Judge //mule//