hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3012 OF 2006 Narendra Manikrao Parsekar ... Petitioner Versus The Mun. Corporation of Gr. Mumbai and anr. ... Respondents Mr. P.K. Samdani, Sr. Counsel with Mr. Merchant i/by Kishroe Thakurdas & Co. for Petitioner. Mrs. P.A. Purandhare for R. Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Birendra Saraf for R. No. 4. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: DECEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: DECEMBER 12, 2006 DATED: DECEMBER 12, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Rule. Heard forthwith. . Considering the limited controversy, the petition is disposed of by issuing the following directions : (1) The respondent Corporation to consider the representation made by Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 dated 30.8.2003 and dispose of the same within eight weeks from today according to law. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)