IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20817 of 2010 1. PRADEEP PAHUJA @ BABLU PAHUJA 2. DHARMENDRA PAHUJA @ DAMU, BOTH SONS OF LATE DAYAL CHAND PAHUJA, R/O MOHALLA-BRAHAMAN TOLI, P.S. TOWN, MUZAFFARPUR. --PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR --OPP.PARTY 3 03.11.2010 Supplementary affidavit filed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary which is up to paragraph 33 dated 19.04.2010 and learned counsel for the informant. Petitioners are named accused in this case carry allegation of taking unlawful possession of a shop, as stated, informant was tenant. There appears dispute between the owners’ family. Eviction suits etc. are also going on. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten 2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Town P.S. Case no. 89 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioners shall remain present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) AAhmad