IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45453 of 2009 DEEPAK GIRI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 2.4.2010 A supplementary affidavit bringing on record the statement of victim girl recorded under section 16 4 Cr.P.C. has been filed today. Let it be kept on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Ekma P.S. case No. 27 of 2009 dated 27.3.2009 registered under section 366 A, 379 and 120 B of the Indian penal Code. According to the prosecution case one Rekha Kumari, daughter of the informant was allegedly kidnapped by accused persons including the petitioner. Subsequently the alleged victim girl was recovered and her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. was recorded recently on 11.,1.2010 vide annexure-3 to the supplementary affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged victim girl has not attributed any role against the petitioner for commission of crime in question. He also submits that main accused Dilip Giri has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court by order dated 18.1.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 242 of 2010. Learned counsel for the State has also not disputed the aforesaid factual position. In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from today be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten - 2 - thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Saran at Chapar in the above noted case, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Birendra Prasad Verma, j) M.Rahman