^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR JVLC.C. N0. 1% OF 2010 PETITIONERS: 1. Ram Kumar Thakur, Aged About- 33 Years, S/o- Shri Jagdish Prasad Thakur, Salesman, Nakpura, Distt. Durg. 2.Bali Ram Sahu, Aged About- 35 Years, S/o- Shri Asha Ram Sahu, Salesm.an, Anda, Distt. Durg. 3. Surendra Bambode, Aged About- 39 Years, S/o- Shri Sukliram. Bambode, Salesman, Anda, Distt. Durg. 4. Narbada Prasad Devangan, Aged About- 38 Years, S/o- Shri Phool Singh, Salesman, Nakpura, Distt. Durg. All resident ofDurg VERSUS RESPONDENT(S): 1. State ofMadhya Pradesh Through Secretary, Commercial Tax Departnient, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal 2. Conimissioner Of Excise Department, Motimahal, Gwalior 3. Excise Officer, Durg APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P. (S) N0. 786/2005 (Ram Kymar Thakyr and others V/s State of Madhya Pradesh and Others) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS M.C.C. No. 13 of2010 Ram Kumar Thakur & Others VERSUS State ofMadhya Pradesh & Others APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE WRIT PETITION SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asnihotri, J. Present: Shri Yinay Pandey, Advocate for the applicants. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 20th day ofApril, 2011) LA.No. 1. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing restoration application. Sufficient cause has been shown. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. Delay is condoned. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the counsel for the applicant could not appear on account of bona fide mistake, therefore, W.P. (S) No. 786/2005, which was dismissed on 9.10.2009, may be restored to its file. 2. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P.(S) No. 786/2005 is restored to the original file, subject to payment of a sum of ? 1000/- to the High Court Legal Ai.d Committee. 3. A copy ofthis order be placed on record of original writ petition and the same be listed for hearing. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge Gowri