Court No.-1 Civil Writ Petition No. 117 of 2001 Padam Singh Kumai ……………….. Petitioner. Versus Milk Commissioner/Registrar Dugdh Sahkari Saimiti Uttaranchal and others …………….. Respondents. Hon. P.C. Verma, J. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 7.2.2001 passed by respondent no. 1 by which his removed the administrator of the aforesaid society and constituted the Administrative committee and appointed respondent no. 3 as Chairman of the administrative committee. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Since the appointment of the administrator or committee of administrators is in he public interest after the expiry of the term as provided under section 29 of the Societies Act, I do not find any infirmity in the order passed by respondent No. 2. It has not been disputed that earlier only one administrator was functioning and he has been replaced by the committee of administrators and obviously the decision of several persons than the decision of a single person may be better in the public interest. Therefore, in my opinion the committee of administrators can work better. However, it is expected from the respondents to re constitute the committee of administrator by election within a period of two months. For the reasons mentioned above, the writ petition is disposed of. (P.C. Verma, J.) R.P. Singh 3.3.2001