IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45096 of 2009 TUKIYA MAHTO @ TUKO MAHTO S/O LATE MEHILAL MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 6.1.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 144, 379, 427 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that no injury was caused to any of the persons when the occurrence took place on account of minor dispute for cutting the tree and the submission is that no offence u/s.307 I.P.C. would be made out, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 15.4.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. IIIrd, Begusarai in S.T.No.709 of 2009 arising out of Bakhari P.S.case No.30 of 2001, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and (ii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )