Criminal Misc.-M No. 29017 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 29017 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.9.2011 Hari Singh .. Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. P. K. Chugh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G. S. Chahal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the incident in the present case took place on account of trespass. The FIR was got registered by the petitioner bearing No. 226, where brothers of the petitioner suffered fire-arm injuries attributed to the complainant side. In the cross-version, which is recorded as FIR No. 230, in which the petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail, though it is claimed that the petitioner was present there, but there is no specific injury attributed to him. There is only one person, who suffered injury on his head. Ram Pal, one of the accused named in the cross-version, has been arrested. None of the persons, who have been specifically attributed injuries in the FIR got registered by the petitioner attributing fire-arm injuries to them, have been arrested. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submitted that it was a mob of 30-40 persons and there is no specific role attributed to them. Jagat Singh had suffered fracture on the skull and the injury was opined to be grievous by the doctor. One Ram Pal has been arrested. Criminal Misc.-M No. 29017 of 2011 [2] After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made above, in my opinion, the petitioner is not required to be taken into custody for interrogation. He shall appear before the Investigating Officer on 8.10.2011 at 10.00 AM for joining investigation. In case of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. He shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. He shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 27.9.2011 mk