IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17768 of 2009 1. MD.JUBAIR 2. MD. JUNAID 3. MD. JHAIR 4. MD. MURTUZA 5. MD. CHUNOO 6. NAYEEMA KHATOON 7. MOSIMA KHATOON 8. RIZBANA KHATOON 9. SHAHVANA KHATOON ….. PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ASMAT KHATOON ….. OPP. PARTY ----------- 02 07.09.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioners who are nine in numbers have joined hands in seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 323, 354 and 313 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that they entered into the house and assaulted the informant/ complainant in order to terminate the pregnancy. It is contended that earlier to that, the petitioner no.8 had lodged a case against the present informant/ complainant and other family members, in which the Police have concluded investigation and submitted charge- sheet. So far as present case is concerned, it is contended that, on investigation, it was found to be totally false case and the investigating authority recommended action for lodging a false case. 2 Referring to Annexure-6, it is contended that a complaint has already been lodged under Section 195 of the Indian Penal Code. Having regard to all these facts, this Court is persuaded to extent the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Madhubani Town (Sakari) P.S. Case No. 112 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. P.K. (K.K. Mandal, J.)