IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19076 of 2010 1. BINDESHWARI MAHTO 2. BIRENDER MAHTO 3. SANJAY MAHTO ------------------------- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 7.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that though there was talk to marry complainant’s daughter with co-accused Dhananjay Mahto son of petitioner no.1 but complainant’s daughter was not ready to remain in petitioners’ village. Further submission of learned counsel is that Complainant married his daughter with another boy also and this case is lodged for some unreasonable gain. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2 Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Complaint Case No. 433/08, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)