IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2008 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 9826 of 2008(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SOFY.V.PUDUSSERY, AGED 42, W/O.V.A.THOMAS, RESIDING AT SITE NO.24, NAMITHA GARDENS, THADAGAM ROAD, KANUVAI,COIMBATORE 108, OFFICIATING AS HSA, AROGYAMATHA HIGH SCHOOL, KOTTATHARA, ATTAPPADY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 581. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETRIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD. 3. THE CORPORATE MANAGER, JAI CHRISTO CMC EDUCATIONAL AGENCY, PALAKKAD, JAI CHRISTO, PALAKKAD - 678 004. 4. SR.TRESSIA N.S., HSA, ST.PETER'S HIGH SCHOOL, KOOKAMPALAYAM, ATTAPPADY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 5. SR.ROSE U ANTONY, HSA, MOUNT CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL, MAMMANA, JELLIPARA, ATTAPPADY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ======================= W.P.(C) No. 9826 of 2008(T) ======================= Dated this the 25th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner aspires for promotion as Headmistress of the 3rd respondent's school. Petitioner alleges that over looking her claim, the management is considering respondents 4 and 5 for promotion to the said post. In the above circumstances, the petitioner has filed Ext.P3 complaint before the 2nd respondent. Petitioner seeks disposal of Ext.P3 expeditiously. 2. I have heard the Government Pleader also. In the nature of the order I propose to pass, I do not think it necessary to issue notice to the respondents 3 to 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there would be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months, from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as respondents 3 to 5. Any appointment made in the meanwhile would be subject to the orders to be passed on Ext.P3 as above. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE jp