1 W.P. No.1283 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.1283 Of 2011 Jagmohansing Narendrasing Chhabada. .. Petitioner. Versus Kesari Ramlal Pardeshi & Others. .. Respondents. ----------- Shri. A.G. Talhar, Advocate, for petitioner. ---------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL, J. DATE 3rd OCTOBER 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1) Heard. 2) Perused the judgment dated 22nd December 2010 delivered by the learned Single Judge (Coram: R.M. Borde, J.) in Writ Petition No.5223 of 2009 and a batch of writ petitions, and the judgment delivered by Division Bench (Coram: Mohit S. Shah, C.J. & D.G. Karnik, J.) on 3rd May 2011 in Writ Petition No.117 of 2011 (Mandatai Sambhaji Pawar v. The State of Maharashtra). 2 W.P. No.1283 of 2011 3) The Division Bench in the case Mandatai Sambhaji Pawar (supra) framed specific issues and held that efficacious alternative remedy is available under the provisions of Section 17(1) of the Consumer Protection Act 1986. 4) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not at all concerned with the transactions and, therefore, he is entitled to approach this Court by filing writ petition. 5) The petitioner is entitled to raise all the available pleas before the State Commission. In the light of the judgment delivered by the Division Bench, the petitioner has efficacious alternate statutory remedy. 6) The writ petition is disposed of. All issues are kept open. Sd/- (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl