mums: ataraw @ IN THE HQN’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHA'I‘TISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) NO. l3éS//2010. PETITIONER: Shatrughan La] Banjare, son of Ghasiram Banjare, aged about 52 years, Posted as Upper Division . Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Sindhiya, Block Podi-Uproda, Korba, Chhatisgarh. versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through, The Secretary Tribal Welfare Department Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ’7 2. Commissioner, Schedule Tribe and Schedule Caste DevelOpment, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. ,3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Korha, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. / 4. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts, Korba, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 3% HIGHCOURT OEaGHHATTlSGARH AT BILAWUR; WRIT PETIT!0N (3) NO, 1365 of2610 A Shanughan Lal Banjare Respondent State of Chhattisgarh & others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE €ONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB Hon'ble Mr. Sahsh K. Agmhotn J ) Peh'tionet Versus Present :- Shn K S Pawar Advoeate for the petmener Shn P K Bhadun, Panel Lawyer for the Smte ORD (Passed on 31 of March, 2010) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finally. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petiioner was appointed initially as Deputy Teacher on a fixed p'ayof Rs. 150/- on probation. After completion of his probation period, the petitioner was granted regular pay scale of Rs. 169-300I—. Learned counsel further submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the data of initial appointment or after completion d probation period The issue Involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tnbunal Jabalpur (for short ”tie SAT’) in 'O A No 2745189 (Madhu/rant Yedu and 56 others us Sme of M P & others) wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale we f the date of initial appomtment The matter was taken up to the Supreme Court The appeal was cismiesed“ by the Supreme Court, upholding the deCIsion- of the Trburial to the efiect that the TeacherslAssistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from date o'f initial appointment In View of the above submissions made by learned counsel tor the parties the writ petition is disposed of On request of the learned counsel the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation to the “respondent authorities if so advrsed to consider his case and mssu appropriate order on its own merit and in its perspective, in the light of¥ the order passed by the SAT in Madhukant Yadu (supra), subsequently h ‘ ‘ confrmed by the Supreme Court in Specie! Leave Petition (Civif) Ne , 6892/93 by order dated 3-1 1994 The authortties ehail consider and . pass the order tn accordance With law expedw Arun