IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERAAD Friday, the 24th day of June, 2011 Present: Hon’ble Sri Justice N. Ravi Shankar Crl.P.No. 5008 of 2011 Between: Marmi Veera Raghavulu and another …Petitioners and Marni Seetha Vijaya Karthikeyani and another …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR Crl.P.No. 5008 of 2011 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The petitioners are A-2 and A-3 in C.C. No. 319 of 2010 on the file of the court of V Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kakinada. The offences alleged are those punishable under sections 498-A read with 34 IPC and Ss. 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Both these petitioners are the parents-in-law of the de facto complainant. The allegations in the charge sheet do show the offences against these petitioners. Hence this is not a fit case for interference under section 482 Cr.P.C. 3. It is however represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the first petitioner is aged about 62 years and the second petitioner, who is a lady is aged 55 years and are not in a position to attnend the trial court on every date of hearing. In the circumstances, the presence of both these petitioners before the trial court for every date of hearing is dispensed with and they can be represented by their counsel. The trial court can however summon their presence before it whenever it considers it necessary. 4. Accordingly this petition is disposed off. _____________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J. June 24, 2011. *BVS