IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9953 of 2011 LAXMAN RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 01.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 147, 148, 448, 307, 427 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. After investigation final form was submitted against the petitioner since accusation was found false but subsequently petitioner has been summoned by the learned Court below in exercise of power under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. It is very shocking state of affairs that neither the learned Court below nor learned P.P. discussed the evidence which persuaded learned Trial Court to summon the petitioner under Section 319 Cr.P.C. and without discussing the same, the bail application has been considered. Since the impugned order does not reflect any evidence which has come against the petitioner during trial and accusation was found false during investigation, let the petitioner namely Laxman Rai, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- 2 (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Assistant Sessions Judge, 1st, Danapur, Patna in connection with Sessions Trial No. 1125 of 2003 arising out of Maner P.S. Case No. 106 of 2001. Learned Court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner, if the petitioner fails to appear on three consecutive dates. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)