IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26096 of 2010 GUDDU SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 03.8.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Kashichak P.S.Case No.57 of 2009 for offence punishable under section 341, 324, 326, 3o7/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently section 302, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act were added to the set of allegations. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a plain reading of the first information report demonstrates that there is general allegation against all the accused persons of firing at the informant. Learned counsel further submits that in similar circumstances, the other two accused persons have been granted bail by this Court. It is submitted that whereas accused Rinku Singh has been granted bail vide order dated 22.6.2010 passed in Cr.Misdc.No.10672 of 2010 ((Annexure-2), accused Soni Singh has been granted bail vide order dated 2 19.7.2010 passed in Cr.Misc.No.6284 of 2010. Having regard to the circumstances and the submissions of the learned counsel, let petitioner Guddu Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Kashichak P.S.Case No.57 of 2009, subject to the following conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police 3 papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)