IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10651 of 2011 BINOD NUT & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is against 10-15 unknown to have committed dacoity. The name of the petitioners surfaced in confession of Chintu Nut. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that Chintu Nut is agnate of the petitioners with whom the petitioners are on inimical terms. There is no recovery from the petitioners. The statement has been made in paragraph no. 9 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, Binod Nut and Bodha Nut, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below 2 within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Bairia P.S. Case No. 66 of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Bettiah, West Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners will file an undertaking before the learned court below that the petitioners shall make themselves available for T.I.P. on any occasion if the investigating agency requires them and if the petitioners are identified during T.I.P. or any recovery has been made from the petitioners then the learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioners. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)