r I 7 tV IN THE HIGH COURT OF YARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED TH 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 1 1998 BEFORE THE HONBT MR W’TICE Y,BHASKAR RAO CIVIL REVISIO PFTITION NO.3546/19 BFTWFF Smt,Char idamma, n’ No, , H,i 1 ,L no. ‘tage, 16th Main Road, mdi anagar, BAR IIOR , .., 4 TITI NER B S i.Iyengar & Co., Adv,) A N D: 1, Sri .Pionanna, S/o.Kuppanna, R/at Varthur Village, Varthur H 0 bli, Bangalore, 2, Sri,Baliapna, S/o,puci anna, R/o,Varthr Village, /arth r bli, Bar i - 2 :— 3. Sri.Pillappa, 5/0, pichanna, Dhopp nahalli, BNGALORE. 4. Chinappa, S/o,sall appa, shoppanahal li, Bang 3’ ore, S. Narav 0 oa, S/o,Ballapa, P/at No.65, Dhopp nahalli, Ban .alore, RESPONDENTS ** ** * * Civ I Revie on retition is f lea J/s,ll’ of (PC ag3nst he o 5cr S ed —Sl 97 p ed in 3,3, No.4264/1992 on the file of the VII Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalor tm his Civil Revis on Petitio coming on for admission this day, the Court made the foliow!ng: ORDER , , , , 3 This Revision Petition is filed assailing the order of the Court below in appointing Conisi ners to make local inspeeti n and to file their Report and adduce evidences The impugned order is passed on 16—l997, Now more har thq hv elnsed Furthr, I hav qoe through the order of the Coirt below and the Court below has given cogent and convincing reasons for appoirting Commissioners, I do rot se any grour’d to interfere with the order of the Court below, ence this Revis on Pet tionis dismissed. Sd/ JUDGE. Iris, P, By C. By : Coirt of Kai iiaakø *enga1ore-eO 001