IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17183 of 2011 Dinesh Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 28.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the panchayat secretary is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 409 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner that the informant submitted his application before the petitioner for being employed as panchayat teacher. It is further alleged that Ajay Kumar and Ashok Kumar Singh were appointed as panchayat teacher on the basis of forged marks sheet. The further accusation is that payments being made to the aforesaid two persons were contrary to the law and the accused persons misappropriated the funds also. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that accusation against the petitioner is that he only after receipt of the application did not appoint the informant as panchayat teacher. 2 The informant in paragraph no. 3 of the complaint has stated that he also filed objection petition before the Block Development Officer against illegal appointment. It appears that the informant has filed the case due to his non appointment and if he was aggrieved by illegal appointment the remedy lies under the recruitments rule. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Mahishi P.S. Case No. 04 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Saharsa, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)