-HC—78 3?T^T ^T f<^iGb '<T8TT ^iT^T^TW i^ T^T ^ll^lKrl^, ^tfl^^Ko, F®i<rlH^< HW^t SbW^ "^ 200 3T1^?TTR^ ( yif^^T) '^TTW^f^T 3TT^?T (Sinqle Bench; Hon'y W.P. [s (Petition U/A 226/2| PETETCONER Vs RESPONDENTS Pawan Agrawal Assistal Enginee bivisionl TempleJ 1. |27 of Constitution of India) Cumar Agra\Na\, S/o Shri Ratanlal aged about 47 years, Employed as ^t Grade-III, O/o Executive \ Water Resources bepartment, Raipur, R/o Shri Laxminarayan [Main Raod, Kota, Raipur Statt Secrl b.K.^ (CG)| 2. The| Dep4 Raip( 3. fhej (CG) 4. The| bep^ Present: Mr. B.P. Rao, Advocate for the p^jtitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, P.L for the Stalle ohl^<rt<flvl TTTR^ff ^* Fs^l <pai^i< ^^tRm^n^r e Mr. Justice Dhirendra Mishra) No.5767/2008 of Chhattisgarh, through : the |etary, Water Resources bepartment, Bhawan, Mantralaya,Raipur 491002 |Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources lirtment Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lines, ^r (CG) jChief Engineer (Mahanadi Pariyojna), Wat|sr Resources bepartment, Raipur Executive Engineer, Water Resources irtment, Division No.l, Raipur (CG) s ^ :^' '3'Sf ^liqi^'q, ?$Tl1^4t(o, [®)<rtt<-f^< "^ 200 sTi^-^^C^^?) ^¥f^?^t^ wr^T^T%^Nr 'M j<os'^f 17.10.2008 With the consent of learnedj heard finally. Leorned counsel for the petij petitioner may be given an oppor-| before the competent authorityj respondents has no objection. Having considered and withou| the case, in the opinion of this Cour is granted to the petitioner to majt grievances before the competent aij copy of this petition dnd prder, on such representation being fi| respondents may decide the same orji early as possible, preferably within| of receipt of the representation. The petition is disposed of ac|c Certified copy as per rules. witltin '^prf^fri'W^Tf ^ fe^ 'tf^j^K ^37fHH3?T^T counsel for the parties, the petition is h'oner submits that for the present the |unity of filing detailed representation to which learned counsel for the ijt expressing any opinion on the merits of \, ends of justice will be served if liberty Jke a detailed representation raising his lithority of the respondents along with a |iin Q period of one month from today and |ed, the competent authority of the its own merit, in accordance with law, as |a period of three rnonths from the date :ordingly. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^W^-T ?NNr H^ii^, —FS/197—3/2008 —40,000.