IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1010 of 2001 ------------------------------------ CRA.2/2000 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, N.PARAVUR CC.721/1996 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS - I, N.PARAVUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------------------------- T.K.PAREED, AGED 69 YEARS, SON OF KUNJUMOHAMMED VALIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, MANNAM, NORTH PARUR. BY ADV. SRI.KAPPILLIL ANILKUMAR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPU NAIR, SON OF DAMODARAN MANCHAYATH HOUSE, MANNAM P.O. N.PARUR. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. ADV. DR.K.B.SURESH FOR R1 R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.S.GOPINATHAN, J. ------------------------------------------- Crl.R.P.No.1010 of 2001 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 24th day of February, 2009 ORDER The revision petitioner was the accused in C.C.No.721 of 1996 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, N.Parur. The first respondent herein prosecuted the revision petitioner for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After trial the revision petitioner was found guilty. Consequently he was convicted. The appeal preferred as Crl.Appeal No.2 of 2000 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, N.Parur was dismissed. Assailing that order this revision petition was preferred. 2. Today when the revision petition came up for hearing, Sri.Kappillil Anilkumar, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, submitted that the revision petitioner is dead. In the circumstances, this revision petition is dismissed as abated. P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE vns