IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.30580-M of 2010 Date of Decision:1.11.2010 Kaur Singh Grewal .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. B.B.S. Sobti, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kirat Sindh Sidhu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Earlier the petitioner was granted 5 days' notice before his arrest vide order dated 10.7.2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana. Subsequently similar relief was granted to him in the second application moved by him. However, since the said order was to remain operative upto 3 months, the petitioner filed 3rd application, which was dismissed as infructuous vide order dated 8.10.2010 passed by Special Judge, Ludhiana, as the inquiry was not completed at that time. The present petition has accordingly been filed on the similar apprehension. Notice of motion was issued for today. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from HC Mohinder Singh states that the inquiry has since been completed. However, the same has been sent to the Senior Officer for further action. No FIR has been registered till date. Accordingly, in case FIR is registered in pursuance to the said inquiry, the petitioner shall be given 3 days' notice before his arrest. Disposed of accordingly. 01.11.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE