2.0^7 ?{ft!12? C i fW^aLt t IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF C.G. AT BILASPUR W. P. (Sl No.37L"7y of 2010 PETITIONERS ; 1. Abha Xalxo, D/o Chait Ram Xalxo, aged about 22 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, posted at Govemment Prunary School, Chhipaniyapara, TahsU-Sitapur, District-Sarguja (C.G.) ^' 2. Baijnath Prasad Gupta, aged about 22 years, S/o Shri Manmohan Prasad Gupta, R/o VUlage-Guturama, Janpad Panchayat-Sitapur, District- Sarguja(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS .<& ^•^ <J)\>C^Xi v^- " •'.-1 .^J^'^ ^'^' ..•-' : 1. State of Chhattisgarh : Through Secretary Panchayat Departa-nent, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2.^ The Collector, Surguja.Distri.et- Surguja (C.G.) 3.' Zila Panchayat Surguja, through Chief Executive Officer, Surguja, District-Surguja (C.G.) ^ - - -^ - —. 4. Janpad Panchayat, Sitapur, through the Chief Executive Officer, District-Surguja (C.G.) 5. Chief Executive OfBcer, Janpad Panchayat, Sitapur, District- Surguja (C.G.) it;;! ..'y^ 6. Goveminent Primary School, Chhipaniyapara, Block-Sitapur, District-Surguja (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONrat^ :- As stated above in cause title. BSI BSII ,«-'.^ € HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION(Sy N0.3773 OF2010 PETITIONERS AbhaXalxo & Another RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Prateek Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Advocate for the respondent No.3 to 5. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 18th day of January, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners sought for a direction to the respondents to pay the. entire salary of the petitioners with 24% interest per annum. -r" 2. Learned counsel further submits that during the pendency of this petition and on account of interim reliefgranted on 04/08/2010, the petitioners have been paid entire salary without interest and, the petitioners do not want to press the issue with regard to24% interest per annumand, assuch, the petitionhas become infructuous. 3. In view of foregoing, the writ petition is disposed of as having ".f become infructuous. SatisliK.Agnihotn Judge Arun