IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 2047 of 2007 Between: K.N. Prabhakar, S/o. Late Panduranga Rao, Hindu, R/o. 46-14-2, Sai Enclave Opp:NIIT Danavaipet, Rajahmundry 533 103. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Oil and NaturalGas Corporation Limited, Rep. byits Director (HR) Jeevan Bharati Towers II, Cannaught Place, New Delhi. 2 Oil and NaturalGas Corporation Limited, Rep. by its General Manager HR-ER Godavari Bhavan, NH No.5, Rajahmundry 533 103. 3 Oil and NaturalGas Corporation Limited, Rep. by its General Manager {Drilling} Godavari Bhavan, NH No.5, Rajahmundry 533 103. 4 Oil and NaturalGas Corporation Limited, Rep. by its Head HRD Scope Minar, South Tower, Laxminagar, New Delhi. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or order more especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the relieving orders No. RJY/1/DBG/1025/84-ESTT Dt. 27-07-2006, without there being any subsisting transfer order, service on the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and against the principles of natural justice and consequentially direct the respondents to issue a fresh transfer orders to the petitioner in accordance with rules, so as to report for duty at any new place of posting as the mandatory reporting period is over under general transfer and consequentially direct the respondents to settle the leave regularization for the period from 10-8-2006 to till date and perquisites, salary and other benefits after the 1st respondent passed the order of relieving vide No. RJY/1/DBG/1025/84-ESTT Dt. 27-07-2006, and consequentially suspend the orders of relieving the petitioner to join at Agarthala vide orders RJY/1/DBG/1025/84-ESTT Dt. 27-07-2006, as there is no transfer order subsisting as on the date of relieving. Counsel for the Petitioner: MRS.SHANTHI NEELAM Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. Kakara Venkata Rao The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 2047 of 2007 O R D E R: After elaborate arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. However, the respondents are directed to permit the petitioner to join duty at Agartala within a period of one month from today. However, this will be subject to the service Rules with which the petitioner is governed. JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU. Date: 06-7-2009. Note: Issue copies in two days. (BO) MVB.