1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1433 OF 2004 CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1433 OF 2004 CRI. APPLICATION NO. 1433 OF 2004 Sundeep Polymers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. .. Applicants. V/s. Bajaj Auto Finance Ltd. & Anr. .. Respondents. ----- Ms.Rita S. Panjwani wtih D.A.Shinde for Applicants. Mr. M.S. Mohite for Respondent No.1. Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for Respondent No.2-State. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 30.09.2004 DATED : 30.09.2004 DATED : 30.09.2004 PC :- PC :- PC :- . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the averments in the petition as well as affidavits filed by the parties. . I find substance in the grievance made on behalf of the Respondent that this is one more attempt to delay the proceedings pending before the appropriate court. This Court has already ordered an early disposal of the trial, as back as on 16th January, 2004. The fact that the Applicant had moved the lower court for similar prayer for transfer, is not stated in the present Application. Detailed order has been passed by the trial court, rejecting the 2 prayer for transfer as back as on July, 2000. Non-disclosure of this relevant fact itself is sufficient to reject this application. Obviously, the present application is only an attempt to obstruct the process of the trial, which is likely to commence in terms of the directions of this court in its order dated 16th January, 2004. So far as the grievance made in paragraph 5 of the application is concerned, it is not in existence now because it is relating to the judicial officers who have already been transferred. Hence, no case to exercise jurisdiction of this court. Rejected. . Order accordingly. .....