IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4684 of 2010 Date of decision: 28th July, 2010 Prem Kumar … Petitioner Versus Shukla Dhanda … Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel submits that once the landlady had tendered her affidavit in evidence, the Rent Controller could not allow the amendment of eviction petition to plead statutory requirements. In the present case, the Rent Controller, after applying its mind, had permitted to amend the eviction petition. The Rent Controller came to the conclusion that husband of the landlady had expired, her two sons were married and that the premises were required for her grandson. The view formulated by the trial Court cannot be said to be perverse. Hence, this Court, while exercising revisional jurisdiction, cannot come to the rescue of the petitioner. Accordingly, the present revision petition is hereby dismissed. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE July 28, 2010 rps