IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9016 of 2010 1. MD.MUKARAM 2. MD. MOAZAM 3. MD. ABRAR 4. MUNNA 5. IMRAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 15.03.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioners have joined hand in seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Section 307/34 of the Penal Code. It is contended with reference to Annexure-3, that there is bonafide land dispute between the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners further states that Title suit is already pending between the parties. There is a counter version as well in the shape of F.I.R. lodged by one of the accuseds of the present case. It is next contended that so far petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 4, namely, Md. Moazam, Md. Abrar and Munna are concerned, there is general and omnibus allegation. Petitioner no.1, namely, Md. Mukaram is said to have inflicted sword blow on the head of the informant. Petitioner no.5, namely, Imran, is said to have put the house/hut on fire. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State, on the contrary, submits that occurrence appears to be admitted. This Court finds that there is specific allegation against petitioner nos.1 and 5. So far petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 4 are concerned, allegations against them appears to be general and 2 vague. Having regard to the submissions of the parties, this Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to petitioner nos.1 and 5, namely, Md. Mukaram and Imran. Their prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected. So far as petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 4 are concerned, this Court is persuaded to extend them the privilege of anticipatory bail. In the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, petitioner nos. 2, 3, and 4, as named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Purnea, in connection with Amour P.S.Case no. 126 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)