WP(C) 609/2003 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. S.C Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.C Goswami, le arned counsel who appears for the UCO Bank authorities, Mancachar Branch. The refusal of a loan to the petitioner by the respondent No. 6 under the Prime Minister’s Rojgar Yojana Scheme (PMRY Scheme) on 27.9.02 has led to filing of th e present petition. It appears from the counter affidavit filed by the Responden t Nos. 5 and 6 that the loan proposal of the petitioner was rejected as it was f ound that the business proposed by the petitioner was not viable in the Mancacha r area. Mr. P.C Goswami, learned counsel submits that the concerned PMRY Scheme has been discontinued from the year 2008 and has been substituted by another scheme and therefore there can be no further consideration of the petitioner’s loan applica tion under the old PMRY scheme. Having regard to the ground on which the petitioner’s loan application was rejec ted, I see no justification to interfere with the Bank’s decision and accordingl y this writ petition is dismissed. However, dismissal of the writ petition shall not stand in the way of consideration of petitioner’s any other loan applicatio n on merit under some other scheme available in the Bank.