IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 7846/2008 Decided on:9.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Satish Kumar. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. R.K. Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 3. Respondents No. 4 to 6 already ex parte. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondents 4 to 6 to the post of Technical Assistant. The suitability of the petitioner and respondents No.4 to 6, as per the averments contained in the reply, has been gone into by a duly constituted Selection Committee. No mala fides have been alleged against the members of the Selection 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 Committee. Since the suitability of the candidates has been adjudged by the duly Selection Committee, this Court will not sit in appeal over the same. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 9.12.2010 *awasthi*