IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.533 of 2011 Between: Bajireddy Sudershan and others ..... PETITIONERS AND The Land Acquisition Officer, Nizamabad ..... RESPONDENT The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for both the parties. 2. Sri V. Manohar Rao, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners submits that the revision petitioners shifted their residence to some other place and they were not in touch with the Advocate and they were also unable to note down the date of hearing. Thus, learned counsel seeks to explain that the delay is not intentional but due to shifting of residence by the revision petitioners. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Arbitration opposed the submission made by the learned counsel for the revision petitioners on the ground that the delay is inordinate. 4. Considering all the aspects of the matter and taking into account the situation the petitioners were placed in that due to shifting of their residence only they were unable to note down the date of hearing of the petition, the Civil Revision Petition deserves to be allowed. 5. Therefore, the O.P.No.51 of 2004 is restored to file. However, the revision petitioners are not entitled for interest on the compensation to be awarded, from the date of dismissal of the Land Acquisition O.P. till the date of its restoration. 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ R. KANTHA RAO, J July 11, 2011. PN THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.533 of 2011 July 11, 2011