R. F. A No. 2632 of 1999 (1) In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A No. 2632 of 1999 (O&M) Date of decision : 23.12.2010 Haryana State ..... Appellant vs Vishav Adhyatmik Sangh Group House Building Cooperative Society Limited, Hisar and another .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. None for HUDA. Mr. M. L. Sarin, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hemant Sarin, Advocate, for the landowners. Rajesh Bindal J. The State of Haryana/HUDA have filed appeals bearing RFA Nos. 2632 of 1999, 358, 359, 510 to 513, 1253 to 1255 of 2000, seeking reduction of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the State of Haryana vide notification dated 21.3.1991 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act') acquired land situated within the area of Hadbast No. 146, Tehsil and District Hisar, for development and utilization thereof as residential sector 16 and parts of Sectors 11, 13, 15 and 17 of Hisar. The Land Acquisition Collector assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ` 3,00,000/- per acre for category 'A', ` 2,50,000/- per acre for category 'B' (abutting railway lines and cremation ground), and ` 2,00,000/- per acre category 'C' land. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowners filed objections. On reference, the learned Court below determined the market value of the acquired land @ ` 171/- per square yard. It is this award which is impugned by the State of Haryana in the present set of appeals. It is not disputed by the learned State counsel that the issues raised in the present set of appeals are squarely covered by judgment of this court in LPA No. 953 of 2000 Partap Singh vs State of Haryana, dated 11.1.2006, whereby the compensation payable to the landowners was further enhanced. R. F. A No. 2632 of 1999 (2) No one has appeared in the appeals filed by HUDA. Since this court had further enhanced the compensation payable to the landowners for the acquired land, the present set of appeals filed by the State/HUDA do not survive. Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in the aforesaid judgment, the appeals are dismissed. 23.12.2010 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge