Civil Revision No.1391 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1391 of 2010 Date of decision: 4.5.2010 Birinder Chand Mehra ...Petitioner Versus Firm Vijay Kumar Kailash Chand and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Arun Palli, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tushar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.K.Sandhir, Advocate, for the respondents. S.D.ANAND, J. It is apparent, from a perusal of the judgment under challenge, that it does not at all contain what could be legally termed to be a discussion of the issues under consideration. Though the judgment runs into as many as 37 paras, it is apparent that the only para devoted to the discussion is para 35 which is extracted hereunder:- “From the perusal of the entire evidence, petitioner/respondent has failed to establish that appellant has changed the user of the property in question. Mere bald statements regarding the fact that appellant has converted first floor into residence does not serve the p urpose and prove the version of the respondent. Rather, the appellant has clearly prove regarding their version of having residence at Lakker Mandi, Amritsar and doing business in building in dispute by way of leading cogent evidence. So, in view of my above detailed Civil Revision No.1391 of 2010 -2- **** discussion and in the light of aforesaid citations (supra) I am of the considered view that petitioner (now respondent) have failed to prove these issues. Thus, issues no.2 and 3 are decided against the petitioner(now respondent) and in favour of the appellant.” It is beyond the pale of controversy that the other paras have been devoted by the learned Appellate Authority to either quoting the pleadings of the parties or the respective stances presented by the parties. The disposal of a judicial matter in this manner is foreign to the system of dispensation of justice. A Judicial Court (at all hierarchal levels) is ordained to notice the controversy between the parties and, then, record a finding on the respective presentations made in relation thereto. In the light of the facts notices above, this petition shall stand allowed. The impugned order dated 20.10.2009 is set aside. The matter shall be listed before the learned Appellate Authority (District Judge, Amritsar) on 12.5.2010. The learned District Judge is requested to retain the appeal on his own board and dispose it of within one month therefrom. May 04, 2010 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge