HI6H COUKT <y CHHATH^ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S) No. 2200 of 2007 Versus Dulamani Patel S/o Sivprasad Pate! Aged d»ut - 58 years ft/o villoge Nusapaii & Post- Sarhumoria Teh. & Oisft. Raigarh (C.6.) 1. Stote of Chhattisgarh Throigh ; 5ecretary School Education bepartment D.K.S. Bhowan, Raipir (c.e.) 2. District Education Officer Raigarh, Oist; Rajgarh- (C.&.) 3. Block Education Officer BIock - Roigarh District - Raigarh (C.6.) SB; Hon'ble r. Justice Satish )C. Agnihotri. Present: Mr. Viyek Kumar Pwidey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Oubey, P<ne! Lawyer for the State/respondents. OR&ER (Passed on this 10th Day of Aprii, 2007) 1. The question of law involved herein asto whether the petitioner is entitled to regulw pcy scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counset appeariry for the petitioner <B wel! as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved tha present writ petition are thesame to that of in W. P. (S) No. 813/20)7 (Ran Kumar- 5diu and others vs. State ©ovt.of Chhattisgarh <& another), which was allowed vide order dcrted 12.02.2CX57. 3. In view of the above-stated submissions made by leor'ned eounsel for the parties, Ihe writ petition is allwed in the swne terms. No ordep as to costs. SiAhash Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge