IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2010 / 11TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 20619 of 2010(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.LAKSHMI, W/O.UDAYAKUMAR.R., REVENUE QUARTERS, NEDUMKANDOM, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF SURVEY & LAND RECORDS, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, SURVEY & LAND RECORDS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVY & LAND RECORDS (RE-SURVEY), NEDUMKANDAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).20619/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2010 JUDGMENT Ext.P1 is an order passed by the 3rd respondent placing the petitioner, a Class IV employee in the office of the Re-Survey Superintendent at Nedumkandom, under suspension pending disciplinary action. In this writ petition, although the petitioner is challenging the order of suspension itself, it is seen that she has approached the 3rd respondent for revoking of suspension by filing Exts.P2, P5 and P8. Orders have not been passed on these representations so far and in view of the pendency of the above, I do not think it necessary that this Court should enter into the merits of the matter, at least, at this stage. In the circumstances, writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider Exts.P2, P5 and P8 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of this writ petition and I.A.8994/2010. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs