IN THE HIGH COURT OP KAIATAKA AT BANGAIORE DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY 0? JUNE 1998 BEORE THE HON BLE Mi . JTJ 3TIO E G. C • BHARUKA PETITION 110:31962/1997 BTEEN; Shri Rajashekar Neelkntappa Yanicappagol, aged 47 years, conductor, KSRTG Bi3apur Depot, Bijapur Division, Biapur. (By Sri Ashok R.Kalyanasbetty, Adv) •.Petitiuier Ai D: 1. The Karnataka State Roat3 Transport corporatton, by its Managing Director, K.H.Rad, Banglore—27. 2. The Divisional Controller, K.S.R.T.C.Bijapur Division, Bijapur. . Shri P.D.Gauacharj, major, Conductor, KSRTC Jarnakhanai Depot, Jmakhandi, Dist:Bijapur. (By Sri Basavaraj V.Sabrd, cIv fC 1 and 2;> • .Respondents . . . W.P. s filed undeL Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to quash vide Annex—B by R2 and etc., This petition coming on for orders this ay the court made the following: V.P. #o. 31962/97 “ROEF Hear I E hok R Kalyans bet y, laarn d unsal for the titner and Mr. Ba va I V. Sat,crsd 1 am 4 Standing c.ounsl for resøondent - the kd.irnataka ct 3te Road T ‘ Fort Co .or tor The ort.tcnt wilt petition is directed gain...t tte wd dt 15 10 1997 (Annncure .iascd I th ?nJ respondent nromotlng the 3rd r—apondent, who is “nior to the petition fror’ the prit of cciieto to th p et )f Tv tf,. Controller on off icia’ing tasjq. 3. It i not U disaite ttat the 3rd ice’ redent, wh, i junior to the petitioner, has been promoted to the pott of 1-aft ic Controller pur,uant to the mdci- at rn’-,cure while case of the petitioTier for promotinn has been k’pt In abeyance fo, tha ieason that he i’ faring disciplinaiy proce.cdiua nd bta’ement or charges has lrc.idy he-Ti ‘ern.d on him on 30.5 1997 and the aflqji-v pioceedings are being telJ with due n-rt p fbi cf tto tition It F t t r stat..d h. Mr. Basav,j V S€baiad tFs’ tF. en.ti. . ha atreedv Ftld three haarir’o%. 4,. It wi’’ be prone’- fpare tn reo.o4ij.e cuide ‘inn No.4 of the Ir ula dt 21.4 1)2 (Ani-xur- F’) -ec dirty Fro’dw for Piomotlon - Rationa1istion thereof “that ttte ernoloyee is not facing a disciplinary pioceeding at the time of corn derathr in whbh cage hi c.lqini may he oac.s.ed over till ‘tech time the dioclplir,ary pioceedinge is disposed eff after which he will not h’ entitled to any promotion if he is punished but is entitled foi promotion with -et ovçwtive effect if he i exonerated provided frthei that Hi annual rnnnt IDmrta I rrlic ated ahave pa a H rvt onta in any adverse i emai ko; IT1 hE jH jiaj r 1f i- rnttc dnoo. nc1 t) It any I1OJ1 t/ in ki t i tL )I( t I toner Ii beyanr e jrdamu:h a th asuit 0± th- dioclpl I aary proeeiinga I havu a bea ing or His romoti Ta1p i rdingl the wIl p titi djsmjs:*d, inyhrj, th* tho Erqui Offinar j dinrted to o rn 1t€ th di iplira pi c dng wi I X m nti f m t ode Sd/ JUDGE jsk,