IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.655 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.2775 OF 2001 Mohammed Mohiddin K. Arbi ..Plaintiffs Vs. Khairunnisa Gulam Mohammed & Anr. ..Defendants Mr. Manoj Mhatre in support of Chamber Summons CORAM: A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATE : 29th APRIL, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard submissions at the bar in support of the chamber summons. Perused the affidavit in support of the chamber summons as also the report, which is impugned herein. It appears that by a reasoned order the assistant to the valuer, considered cumulative sinking fund method in order to arrive at the valuation figure in the sum of Rs. 1835/- per month in respect of the suit premises, which according to the registered valuer is fair and reasonable. It also appears that the premises in question situate at Vakola Market with approach road to the suit premises and have independent entrance from the road constructed with B.M. Wall and Cement Sheet Roof described as pakka construction. Under these circumstances, the valuation appears reasoned one and cannot be faulted, at this stage, therefore, need not be interfered with. I do not find any infirmity in the impugned report, of course, the amount paid accordingly would be liable to be adjusted subject to the final decision in the suit. 2. The plaintiff can move to pray for early hearing and get the suit expedited. 3. For the above reasons the chamber summons is dismissed. (A.P. BHANGALE, J.)