;^^-?"- la the Msh Coart of CIihattisffarh, Jwiicatm'e at Bilaspur (Chhattlsffarh) tTrit PeUt&n No, <=r9CT /20©1 a /y „-•<•; ^ SMv Bhawan Singh, son o£ Shri &s Ba3Li Siagh, Lab» Techoicisia, G0vt» P.GoCollege, JagdaXpur, ..fi^ y^ Bastar (Chhattlsgarla). .^<^/ ->'y^ Versas 1» State of Madhya Pradesh, Threagh Secretary> Hi glaer Educati.OM ©epar"taaent» Nantralaya> VaLlateM Bhawan, BtopaL (M.P.). 2» Coaaissioner, Higfaer EdMcation Bepar'toen-b, Sa^uda Bhawa?a> BhopaL (H«P»)< 5« Principal> GOTt, P»G»College, JagdaLpur, B^star Chhat'tisgarh^ 4^ CQwaS.ssS.onerf Bastar Division» JagdaLptar, Bas-fcaT Chhat'tisgarN' 5« State Adiaixais'fcratige Tril3tinaL» Banch Raipur, Tliromgh RegLstrar> S'fcate Acteinstra'tive Tribianal Benc^ Raipur Cbha'fctisgarh ••< Petltioiier Re^poadents -2- yrit Petitioa wader Artide, 226 7 22T_©^ ^ns'&t^tion of Indla r ©ireetion©£ A©oropriarte » Writ and DtreG'fcion. _ _1. T XI-HC-22 ~5~^ v^wwL\, w€tw^,f^rey W.p. No^ 379/20QL 1RTR^IT '^'W^' ^[T^I^T f^fN'3T{i¥T ^)1Hi<=h TlfiTT ^TI^T ^^TW^fiTT 9/5/2001 Shri Ramalcant Mishra, petitioner^ • . , -.. Dr^ N^K^ Shukla^ learjned Dy^X^O^ for the State Heard^ - . The petitioner while <3n a residential quarti^rs but he Rewa^^ras required to vacat^ vacatling 4f instead of imnediately cation to the concerned off: premises latest by the end thereafter he -did not ^acat^ of the re-transfer from'Rew4 in possession of the house that.he is entitled to contJI; original application filed dismissed by the State he has come t© this Courto After hearing -^he led. we are unable to concede to counsel that because of his ^t^^-i ^S^^i'^'fe^' <M^K '^'^rf^R ^n^i learned counsel for the Iposfeed at jagdalpur ^ras allotted t^is tr.ans'fer from J.agdalpur to the premiseso The petltioner the pr^isesg made an appliw lcer that.he would vacate the May, '2000, Zt appears that the house^ but ta5cingadvan-tage- t©Jagda Ipixr 3 aonltinued to r^isain ^nd made an application afcating ,nue to occupy the house^ His the present petitioner waa Tribunal^ thereafter^ kty Admirlistrative Irned counsel for the petitioner^ Jthe argumeri^s of the learned jre-transfer from Re^a to Jagdal- JpUTa he is entitled to oaci|py the houseo The allotment [•^?fe^ G 0 t 3T[^T^T f^TNT^fT^I ^'<JW<:iT^'Q rsnr 3T?^T 4^^ (^?v|^<^) W^I T^i^ TS^ •\ ^^Rt^ 'HTR^ff ^* 'fe7^ Tf^E^R ^^W^T^f ^as made in favour of t^e petitioner when he was originally posted at ja^dalpur and immedi^ly on his transfer his right ^o occupy the house came to an ende The ..petltioner 1 to the Authorities that - fr.ora. Rewa to. Jagdalpur ^ to hlm. on the facts, interfer en ce xn- -this dismi-.ssed^ - fe free..'-to make an application in vi®tfof his re-transfw ~^he .very house be allofcted ^e ar-e'unable to make any pe^ifeion^ It is accordingly Certified copy t@day Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- R.S. Garg Judge