Civil Revision No. 6 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6 of 2010 Date of Decision: February 24 , 2010 State of Haryana and others ......Petitioners Versus Raghunandan Parshad ...... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.K.C.Bhatia, Addl.AG, Haryana for the appellants. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against the order of the executing Court whereby a vehicle of the Government has been ordered to be attached till the restoration of the possession over the suit land in terms of Civil Court decree dated 18.12.91995. As per the said decree the petitioners were permanently restrained from demolishing the existing construction of the respondent-decree holder on the spot. Thereafter the said construction was demolished. The respondent took out execution. In the objections the petitioners admitted the demolition. It was in those circumstances that the impugned order was passed. Learned Additional Advocate General has argued that in fact the construction has been demolished only from that portion of the land which was owned by the petitioners and had been illegally encroached by Civil Revision No. 6 of 2010 2 the respondent. I am afraid this plea is not available in the face of the decree. It is open to the petitioners to get the encroachment, if any, removed by following the due procedure of law but the civil court decree which is admittedly between the parties and in respect of the same property cannot be ignored. Consequently this revision petition is dismissed. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE February 24 , 2010 sunita