HE$H CGQRT OF CHHA'E‘HSQJRRH A"? E§LASH§R 55ng§e Bench : Hoa’bie $hfi Hi. iiaé‘éa, CJ. Wri‘i Petitian §\30.643 OF 2§05 ?¢*itioner Kunj Ram Kaehvaga aaed 48 year: scn of Shri Bhagwagdm. resident 0f wa?d No.3) (near Middle Schaol} Nam Tehsi! Janjgr and Distrist Jamgir-C’nampa (Chhatti3gam) Vs. Respondems 1, Municipal Cou wcil JaniqirNaila threuah the Chief Municipai (Di-Then at janjgirf District Janjgir—Champa (Chhattisgarh) 2. State of Chhatt'isgam, through the Secretary, Urban Administrétiery Raipur Preeem: Shri S math Velma, counsel for ihe petitiener. O§AL GREER gPasseé an 21" March. 20m} The petitioner was appomted as a deny wage empioyee in the post 0f Tube Welt & Pipeiine Mechanic in the year 1?:82. The petiiioner is werking since then continuously and without break till now. The grievance oi the petitioner in this writ petition is that the respondents have not regularized his sen/ices till date. The petitioner had submitted eeverai representations to the respondents praying for regularization of his services, He had aieo tried s representation on 30—1 2—1997 to the first responoent and a representation to Hon’ble Chief Minister on 18—8-2003 to regularize his services Since those representations have not yet been considered, the petitioner has approached this court requesting to direct the respondents to consider his representations for reguéarization of his services. (2) in my opinion, the responsible respondents ought to have considered the grievances of the petitioner made in his representations Since that has not been done, a direction requires to be issued to the respondents Accordingly; the following (7) OE RDE The writ petition is disposed of, A direction is issued to the competent authoriiy before whom the representation said to have been filed by the petitioner is pending, to consider the same and pass an appropriate erder in accordance with iaw within eix months from the date of receipt or” a copy of this orderi Qmiered accordingly. Sd/-.' ChiefJustice'