IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 4TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 13TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 23085 of 2008(W) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- ALIKUTTY, S/O. KUTTIYALI, SAIDUKADAVATH HOUSE, TANUR, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN. RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.V. MANOJ KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/09/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.23085/2008-W: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DTD. 07/08/207. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD. 23/02/2007 IN M.V.A.A. NO. 841/2007. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.23085/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner was granted a permit with a condition that trips will be conducted up to Koottayi. Against that condition he filed an appeal, which resulted in Ext.P2. The Tribunal by Ext.P2 allowed the appeal and directed to grant the permit as applied for, subject to settlement of timings. It is complaining that the judgment has not been implemented, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 2. Learned Government Pleader submits that there is a proposal to challenge Ext.P2 judgment and that is the reason for delay. However, even if the said submission of the Government Pleader is taken at its face value, the fact remains that, as at present no appeal has been filed. Therefore, the judgment deserves to be implemented by the 2 RTA, Malappuram and a direction is so issued. However, it is clarified that, the implementation of Ext.P2 shall be subject to the out come of any proceedings which may be instituted against the judgment of the Tribunal. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 3