IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2009 / 18TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 15656 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ MURALIGOPAL M.K. KARUNAKARAM, VANCHIYOOR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, CHIRAKKALAM ROAD, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, HOUSING BOARD JUNCTION, CHENKALCHOOLA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE VANCHINADU HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, (REG.NO.T.1088), SREEKANTESWARAM, FORT.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 5. K.VIJAYAKUMAR, T.C.42/642, THYKKOOTTATHIL HOUSE, KALLUMMOODU, MUTTATHARA, VALLAKKADAVU P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. A.VIJAYAKUMAR, T.C.43/468, GANGANAGAR, MANAKKAD P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 7. G.S.PRAKASH, SABARIGIRI, LATHA TIMBERS LANE, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 15656 OF 2009 (B) ===================== Dated this the 8th day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T The prayer that is sought in this writ petition is to direct consideration of Ext.P1, where allegations have been made against the 4th respondent. It is seen that the same is addressed to the 3rd respondent, who does not have any power to entertain any complaint in the nature of what is raised in Ext.P1. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, the 3rd respondent has forwarded the same to the 2nd respondent, the petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment and thereupon the 2nd respondent shall take appropriate action in the matter with notice to the affected parties. 3. It will also be open to the petitioner to move the 2nd respondent independently, if he so desires. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp