SB Crlmb No.4224/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B.CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.4224/2010. Raju @ Rajpal & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 25/5/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri S.S. Sunda for the petitioners. Shri Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor for State. ****** Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Considering the submissions made at the bar, the nature of accusation against petitioners, the materials on record and all other facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge petitioner No.1- Raju @ Rajpal on bail at this stage however, at the same time, I am inclined to enlarge petitioner No.2-Mahendra on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application of petitioner No.2. The bail application of petitioner No.1 Raju @ Rajpal S/o Sohan Lal under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in FIR No.57/2010 Police Station SB Crlmb No.4224/10. 2 Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu for offence under Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act is therefore rejected at this stage. Petitioner No.1-Raju @ Rajpal would however be at liberty to apply for bail again before the Court of Sessions after filing of challan. However, the bail application of petitioner No.2 Mahendra u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner No.2-Mahendra S/o Dana Ram shall be released on bail in FIR No.57/2010 Police Station Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu for offence under Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing until conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil