1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER FROM ORDER FROM ORDER NO.483 OF 2002 NO.483 OF 2002 NO.483 OF 2002 Shri Tej Bahadur Brijnarayan Singh Thakur ...Appellant Vs. Municipal Corproation of Greater Bombay ...Respondent None present for the Appellant. Mr.J. Xavier for Respondent-B.M.C. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: JANUARY 10, 2005. JANUARY 10, 2005. JANUARY 10, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. None present for the Appellant. By this Appeal from Order the Appellant has taken exception to the order dated 16th May 2002. By the said order a prayer for grant of ad-interim relief has been rejected and the Notice of Motion was made returnable. There is no ad-interim order granted by this Court. In fact, the Appeal is not placed for admission for last more than two years. 2. In view of this position, ad-interim relief cannot be granted at this stage after lapse of more than two and half years. Hence, Appeal is not entertained and same is dismissed with no order as to costs. 3. It is obvious that the Notice of Motion, if pending, will be decided by the learned Trial Judge without being influenced by the ad-interim order and confirmation thereof by this Court. 4. Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. Judge. Judge. Judge.