1 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2502/2006 Smt.Savitri Devi Vs. MACT, Sriganganagar Date of order : 12.05.2006 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.H.R.Chawla for the petitioner Learned counsel for the petitioner has made a mention stating urgency that the marriage of the children of the petitioner is already fixed on 13.05.2006 and 14.05.2006 i.e. tomorrow and day after tomorrow and, therefore some amount may be permitted to be released from the fixed deposits made in the name of the petitioner under the orders of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sriganganagar. Learned counsel has pointed out that so far the daughter is concerned, an amount of Rs.1 lac was kept in deposit in her name and in view of her marriage, upon submission of a writ petition, this Court by the order dated 10.05.2006 permitted withdrawal of Rs.50,000/- from the FDR made in her name. Learned counsel has shown copy of the interim order dated 10.05.2006 passed in writ petition No.2434/2006 : Poonam Vs. MACT, Sriganganagar. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not annexed copy of the award made by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sriganganagar, however, has shown a photostat of the said award dated 10.05.2005. 2 Having regard to all the facts and circumstances and particularly the fact that the petitioner has already proceeded to fix the marriage of the children, this Court is of view that no further disbursement from the deposit made in the interest of and for the benefit of family should be permitted. So far the daughter is concerned, she has got an amount of Rs.50,000/- released from her FDR. The petitioner has proceeded to fix marriage of the children without making any prior application for release of the amount, and has filed this writ petition only on 12.05.2006 stating the need for marriage ceremonies on 13/14.05.2006. On being questioned as to when the children were got engaged and marriage was fixed, learned counsel submitted want of instructions on these facts. Having regard to all the circumstances and the set up of the family, this Court is of opinion that the amount which is kept in deposit for the betterment of the petitioner and her family should not be permitted to be disturbed at this stage in the name of marriage of the son. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. (DINESH MAHESHWARI),J. MK