1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No.3309 of 2009 (Shri Ashwin Vardhaman Golechha v. State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri Masood Shareef, Advocate for Applicant. Smt. T.D. Khade, APP for R- 1, 2 and 4. Shri S.D. Sirpurkar, Advocate for R- 3. Coram : R.M. Borde, J. Dated : 28 th June, 2010 In this matter, it appears that pursuant to the FIR lodged by respondent No.3, the investigation was carried out by the police. The police machinery has completed the investigation and it appears that no offence appears to have been made out on the basis of the complaint lodged by the complainant. The State Government has presented an affidavit-in-reply verified by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, State CID, Nagpur. It is averred in the affidavit that there is no material found against the petitioner in respect of the commission of alleged offence. It is also specifically noted in para 8 of the affidavit-in-reply that an application is being made to the learned Magistrate for grant of “B” Summary. It is pointed out that an application is already moved by the investigating officials to the learned Magistrate for grant of “B” Summary and it is stated that the application is pending for consideration before the learned Magistrate. In this view of the matter, it is expected that the learned Magistrate shall pass the order on the application presented by the 2 Investigating Agency expeditiously and preferably within four weeks from today. In view of this, nothing survives for consideration in the criminal application and the same is accordingly disposed of. Judge. pdl.