bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1851 OF 2009 Nand Impex ..Appellant Vs. The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax ..Respondent Ms.Sneha Phane with N.N.Mayekar with Sonam R.Bohra i/b. Little & Co. for appellant. Mr.D.K.Kamwal for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 10th NOVEMBER,2009 P.C. 1. Heard. Perused appeal. 2. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 27th November, 2007 and another order passed in Miscellaneous Application on 21st July, 2008. The appeal was obviously barred by limitation against both the orders. However, Notice of Motion taken is out seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal against the order dated 21st July, 2008. That is how the prayer was made for condonation of delay. Whereas, no prayer is made seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal against the order dated 27th November, 2007. Consequently, there was no condonation of delay so far as filing of the appeal against the order dated 27th November, 2007 is concerned. 3. In the above view of the matter, the appeal is barred by limitation. Hence, the same is rejected. This leaves the appeal directed against the subsequent order based on miscellaneous application against which the appeal is not maintainable. The appeal is rejected even on second count. With no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)