PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR w.P.(S) No.7o41/2011 Krishna Dutt Tripathi, S/o Shri Babulal Tripathi, aged about 53 years, Office of the Forest Division Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 1 Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Chief Conservator of Forest, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) The Forest Conservator, Durg, Circle Division Durg (C.G.) The Sub Divisional Officer, (Forest) Forest Division Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) Lokeshwar Sahu, aged about 52 years, Office of the Forest Division Rajnandgaon, District Kabirdham (C.G.) Sewak Ram Dewangan, aged about 50 years, Office of the Forest Division Durg, District Durg (C.G.) Chinnu Ram Sahu, aged about 58 years, Office of the Forest Division Durg, District Durg (C.G.) Ramanand Soni, aged about 53 years, Office of the Forest Division Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 2§ k) W.P.(S) NOJO41/201 1 9 Mohanlal Dhawalkar, aged about 47 years, Office of the Forest Division Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 1O Pramod Sharan Singh; aged about 50 years, Office of the Forest Division Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance : Mr. Bharat Rajput, Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents 1 to 4 on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (28.11.2011) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard finaliy with the consent of iearned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is working on the post of Forest Guard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that many juniors to the petitioner have been promoted from the post of Forest Guard to the post of Forester, but the petitioner has not been promoted. He submits that the petitioner has made a representation on 05.05.2010 (Annexure P/6), but the same has not been decided till date. He further submits that forthe present, this writ petition may be disposed of with the direction to the concerned authorities to decide the representation dated 05.05.2010 within a stipulated period granted by this Court. 2f w.P.(S) No.7o41/2011 This limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by learned counsel for the State. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction that if so advised, the petitioner may file a fresh copy of the representation dated 05.05.2010 (Annexure P/6) along with other relevant documents and a copy of this order before the concerned authorities within a period of 15 days from today and lf such a representation is filed, the same shall be disposed of by the said authorities in accordance with law as early as possible preferably within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the representation. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this writ petition stands finally disposed of. / No order as to cost(s). /‘// M/M’J Sunai Kuma‘ S‘mm S iudge l \i