BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Third day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.17081 of 2011 1 P. PARAMATHEVAR 2 P. SIVAKUMAR 3 P. MUTHIAH 4 P. ELANGOVAN 5 P. RAMESH 6 SELVAM @ TAMILSELVAM 7 MRS. PANCHAVARANAM ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIRUVEEDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL IN CRIME NO.231/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. BABU RAJENDRAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 447, 341, 323, 354, 294(b) and 506(i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.231 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioners have approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2.Heard Mr.Babu Rajendran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. It is also submitted that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and no prejudice would be caused to the prosecution in the event of the petitioners release on anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would also submit that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakkottai and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 23/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NILAKOTTAI 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIRUVEEDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL +1. CC to M/S. BABU RAJENDRAN Advocate SR.No.45603 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17081 of 2011 Date :23/12/2011 SMA/26.12.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/