(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2969 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2969 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2969 OF 2004 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2968 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2968 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2968 OF 2004 Chandrakant Kalu Bacchhav ...Applicant Versus Vishwanath Ramchandra Dorage & Ors ...Respondents ..... Mr. N.V. Walawalkar, Advocate for Applicant None for respondents 1 to 10. Mr. S.R. Shinde, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 29TH JUNE, 2005 DATED: 29TH JUNE, 2005 DATED: 29TH JUNE, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant. None appears for the respondents though served. 2. Sufficient cause has been made out to condone the delay in filing Criminal Appeal, hence, delay is condoned. 3. Application is disposed of. *****