'fl^ IdSr^ f -- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAKHAT BILASPUR (C.G.t W.P. (S) No. t>^c' 3 of2011 PETITIONER .^€^" ^^ ^ D.D. Bani, S/o Late Shri Vijaydhar Prasad Bani, aged about 59 years, Occupation- Pield Officer, Rank-I (suspended) Chhattisgarhh Gramin Bank, Branch Lendhra, Distt. - Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS President/Chairman Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank, head Office - Choubey Colony, 1 Recreation Road, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. .&•-•" RESPONDENT ..*-:" S^ .„»>,i s^ff^ " K -^ -v^v- ^ V '*€./^- ^-^^ < Q "iy HIGH COItRT 0»GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPOR 8B : HOM'BLE MR. JU8TICB PRITINBaBR DIWAKER PBTITIONER RESPONDENTS W.P.JSI.NO. 3703/2011 D.D.Baai versus RTesideat/ChaaHBan, C.G. GBEiTnm Baok Shri K.N.Nandc, counsel for the petitioner. WRIT PBTITION UNDERARTICLB 236 OP THE CONSTITUTIOK OP INDIA ORDBR (13.07.2011) ChaUengc in the present writ petition is te the order dated 17.4.2010 bywhlcb fhc petitioner was suspended. Contention ofthe counsel for ffae petitioner is tliat pursuant fc> fhe order passed by this Court, against his suspension order fhe petitioner has already filed appeal on 2.2.11 but t31 date fhe same has not been decided aad thcrefore directioa bc tesucd to the appellate aufhorily to decide the appcal iauncdiately. Considering tiie facts aud circuiastances of fhe casc, aad thc limited piayer ofthe petitioner, the respondent is direeted to decidc the pendiag appeal of the pctitioner if already not decided, as aqpeditiousty as possible preferabty wifhin a penod of one inoafh finm fhe date ofrece4>t ofcopy ofthis ordcr. It is inade clear fhat tliis Court has iwt cxpressed auy opinfon on merits ofttie case and fhe auftiority concemed would be at liberty tto decide the same in accordance wifh law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker -< Judge r