./ Sn5o>b'6'87892 IN THE HIGH COUBT GF JUDICATURE AT JABALPU& (MP) Criminal Bevision N0. ^9€ /2000 Applicants s 1- ')P JOA^ 2- ^ ^°>^ >^. ^y ^95fy ^•x ^ 3- Idu Khan^ aged about 55 years^ son of Bcimzan Khan Musalman^ Munim Khan, aged about 3 O ye ars ^ son of Idu Khafi» A^nir Khan^aged about 22years^ sonof Idu Khan, All by Occupation Agricultrust^ & residents of Devpura^P^ S^ : Sglhewara^Distt^Rajnandgaon (MP) Versus Bespondent Sfcafce of Madhya Pradesh, •• • . Through P.S. Salhewara^District Bajnandgaon (MP), REVISION Pm-ITION UNDER SQ3TION 397 WITK SffiTIQN 401 GF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROC^URE. (3) XI-HC-22 ^^^iyi^i^aeig^l^ f ' ' • .. •'• '-• • . ' • > . '. •• .•.•... ..- . . '• , . 3i?^F 1E?^F Cr,R.^No.l296/2000 ' ^l^dl^Nicb"''"" "<a^^^"<^4'^^*^:T^ 199 Ri^^"*<'"^""*^<'"^*w aw<*'^\ a??T^l^T tqvil"?» 3i?|sr si»*iw^n Subbu< 3?liST ^-wi^R ^fea 7. 12'. 2000. Shri Deep Kesha»wanij applicante.So Shri Rarweersi^igh^: Parties a/re heard. The submissions ©f applicants are fehat as fror^ and the First Information that fehe intention of fche miurder or feo eause any life, therefore, a eharge p] 307 I op <»c could not be level learned counsel for fhe lea{rne<a <2cmnsel ffor the Sfeafee< thje j-nj^y In the opinion of tha,| the applj-can-ts .tntended to | which was 'otherwis e&angerQuJ the life is not required; -fco] The question of intenfeion'xl after recording of the evi^ find no reason to inter£erel ^i<<t<n<<1^ 'TO^f ^f ?^<<fll <(^^$i< '^^f^FT^n^T , h|e 'learned counsel for the fehe oase-diary stat ements Rjeport it does not appear a^pllcsants was to commit i2|ry which was dangerous feo ^nishable under Seation BLled against the applicants ^ ^ Court. the quesfeion whether pause such bodily injury feo life qr could endanger b^ seen ai tehis stage< .11 be aeen by the Courfc lenee. At this stage, I 'The ^etife.lon ts ^israiss^. Sd/- j R.S. Garg Judge N^w> ^