cp369.10 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ CP/369/2010 In WP/2443/2009 GOVINDRAO TUKARAM DESHMUKH VERSUS THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Mr.Patil Indrale Anand V. AGP for State. Advocate for Respondent(s) :Mr.Suryawanshi K. J. Adv.R/4 ... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. Dated: July 13, 2011 ... Heard. 2 The learned Counsel for the respondents submits that the principal amount towards gratuity has been paid to the petitioner. This position is not disputed by the Counsel for petitioner. There is only question of interest for which the petitioner is entitled. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, to that effect order has been passed. However, the cp369.10 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ amount is not paid. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, he can file independent proceedings. However, upon perusal of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court and reply filed by the respondents, it clearly appears that the order of the Division Bench has been complied with. No further orders are required to be passed in this contempt petition. Contempt Petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) PLK/*