HI6H COURT OF CHHATTESSARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5001 of 2007 Petitioner Professor &r Sudhir J. <"hipde, 5/0 Late 5hri Janardan Rao Chipde, oqed about 65 years, Retired Professor, S^esident of "Saraswati", Near Jain Atandir, Main Roacf, new 5arkanda, Bilaspur. Versus Reqiondents 1. 'TTie State of Gihattisgnrh, throi^h •ihe Secretary, Ministry of Hi^ier Educution, Secrelwiut &k Kiuuwn, Raipur (C.6.) 2. The Commissioner, Higher EducaTion D^xir-tment, Sovernment Science Coliege campus, Raipui* (C-6.) 3. C.M.&ubey Shiksha Samiti (Registered) through the Chuirmt>n, C.M. tlubey Post Smduate, Colley, Link Road, Bilaspur (C.6.) 4. The C.M.&. Post Sroduate Colle9e •t+irough its Soveming body & Ex- officio Secretary/Princioal, C.M. Dubey Coliege, Biluspur (C.©.) WRFT PETTTOIN UN&ER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTHVHON OF IN&IA Sirigle Bench ; Hon'ble Mr- Satish K. Agnihotri. J. 5hri U. N. Awasthy, 5enior Adyo<Mte with Shri M. K. 5inha, Advocnte for the petitiorier. . Shri Yashwcnt Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate Seneral for The r-espondents No. 1 and 2. ORAL OROER (Passed on this 30th day of April, 2008} 1- This matter pertains to retirol dues. This Court in the matter of Writ Petition No. 4642/2004 (Baijna+h Mandal Vs. The 5+ate of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected motters, decided on 31.1.2008, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retrial dues as the disputed question of facts were invotved. The Committee iwas constituted by the State fiovemment, pursuant to -( •2. the order dated 19.6-2006 passed in W.P.No- 1961/2006 (Smt. ^e.y Bai Chandrakor Vs. 5'iate Sovemment and others) ond order dated 13.3.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105/2008 (State of Chhatt-isgarh and others Vs. Baijnath AtenAi! and another). Thus, •this petition is squareiy covered by the judgment end order dated 31 of Jwwary, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Boijna+h Mondol Vs. The State of Chhottisgarh A. others) and other connected matters, os subinitted by leamed counse! nppearing for the parties. 2. With the consent of •the par+ies. this petition is accor-dingly diqiosed of in the same terms i.e. the office of •the Advocate Seneral is directed to send the case to the Committee. within a period of 15 days from •the dote of receipt of a copy of this order. TTiereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to •the petitioner and tt-ie officers concemed, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shol! consider nnd pass order, in accordance with taw, after affonding proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner ond •i'he officer concemed may file additionol documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, includina paynient of retrial dues, if any, to the petitioner be coinpleted within o period of four months froip Itie date of receipt of a copy of this order- 3. The petitioner Aall supply extra copy of -rtie petition to leamed counsel appearing for the reqiondents, for onward transmission to the said cominittee- TbAur SatishK.Agnihotn Judge