IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 145 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 341 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7622 OF 2005 Precision Tools ... Appellant V/s. Pune Labour Union & Anr. ... Respondents Mr. S.M. Paranjape for the Appellant Mr. P.M. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for the State. CORAM: J.N. PATEL AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 22, 2007 P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the appellant aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Single Judge refusing to grant interim stay in the matter. 1 3. It is submitted that if no stay is granted to the impugned order, which is challenged before the learned Single Judge, the petitioner-employer would suffer substantial loss, as the amounts awarded to the first respondent's members cannot be retrieved. In our view, this cannot be a reason for granting interim stay. The appellant-petitioner can very well insist on surety in case they are wiling to deposit the amounts in this Court, and the Court permits the respondent-union to withdraw the same. With these observations, both the Letters Patent Appeal and Civil Application are dismissed. J.N. PATEL, J. A.A. SAYED, J. 2