an^t.^BT f<;")i«b ^rarsn^r sh*iiq> '^ y(- 75? "MI'siiiyS^, ISitfl+l'IS, (sfOltiy ^ra^ff *^t«b ^p^^0-16^^ •V^ 200 an^rxRR; (ii«i(-i«i<«T) ^^li<aT ^iict 'Sfl^t SB: HON'BLB WSWt DHIRBNbRA MISHRA.J. PETTTIOMER vwss'as RESPONDSKT 4-4-20<» [upesh Kuinar Pandey, S/'o shri (lathura Prasad Pandey, aged about 36 ^ears, Zila Panchayat, Korba (CG) R/o. (^tr. No. 23, Ward No. 35, Main Road, forwa, Distt. Biiaspur (CG) Sjni R.P. Maudal, Sccreiai-y, Dcpai'iiueut of Panchayat and Rural Developinent, D|.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) Shri Paakaj Shrivastev^, Petitioner has filed t|us Constituuon of India read with Courts Act against respo}ident respondent has flouted the 2223/2007 ofAnuexure C-l.| Afler going fhrough fh^ order of fhis Coiut has alrea( and the contemnor has tenldered coinptying wifh the order. Affidavit offhe contemlior In view offhe aEBdavitl rurttier proceeaing is necessspy Accordingly fhe proceej cfii^Ifl-^T'^s^ ^s^^ <H>i-^i< '^aiRnail^l ^, Advocate, for the petitioncr. petition imder Article 215 of the Section 12 and 15 ofthc Conteinpt of with fhe aUegation that the brder dated 11-4-2007 passed in W.P. couater affidavit, it is observed tbat the ly been coinplied with, fhough belatedly lered unquali&ed apology for delay ia is accepted. that the order staads comp&d with, no ly in fhis matter. Luigs are (Iroppca. ^endra^hr3 Jud&e uwfl'1 <ffi7 jj!(»lli*!|,mwK'IM —FS/59— 8/2007 —30,000.