1 S.B.C.W. NO. 4835/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4835/2009 M/s Bikaner Petroleum Suppliers Vs. Union of India and Others Date of Order : : 26.05.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. Vineet Jain for the petitioner. BY THE COURT By an application being I.A. No. 8522/09 the petitioner seeks to delete the respondent No.1 from the array of the respondents. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the application is allowed. Amended cause title has been filed, same may be placed at appropriate place in the file. The respondent No.3 has been served. The respondents No.2 and 3 are the same parties. The service is therefore, complete. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears for the respondents though served. The only request of the petitioner is that the petitioner may be permitted to make a detailed representation ventilating his grievances to the respondent Indian Oil 2 S.B.C.W. NO. 4835/2009 Corporation and the respondent may be directed to consider and decide the same. In view of the statement of counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner make a detailed representation ventilating his grievances to the concerned respondents and if such a representation is made within two weeks from today, the concerned respondents shall consider and decide the same utmost expeditiously in accordance with law. With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (H.R. PANWAR), J. Rp 3 S.B.C.W. NO. 4835/2009 S.B.Civil Misc. Stay Petition No.7829/09 In S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 4835/09 Date of Order : 26/05/2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. Vineet Jain for the petitioner. Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of, the stay petition also stands disposed of. (H.R. PANWAR), J. Rp