IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31823 of 2009 RAMCHANDRA YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 09/09/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is the father-in-law, aged 74 years, in custody in a complaint case under Sections- 498A, 494, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324 and 406 of I.P.C. The submission is that in a 10 year old marriage his son allegedly had an extramarital affair leading to the allegations. The impugned order of rejection is in teeth of the guidelines laid down by this Court for grant of bail in matrimonial matters in its judgement reported in 2006(3) P.L.J.R. 182 (Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Anr. Vs. The State of Bihar) and the judicial adventurism deprecated in the judgement reported in 2006(4) P.L.J.R. 342 (Ajay Kumar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar). Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Ram Bihari, Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in Complaint Case No.62C of 2008. Let this order be communicated to the presiding officer who has passed the impugned order. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)