IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11175 of 2011 RIT LAL YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 04.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioner is named in the first information report with allegation that he along with others conspired and got eliminated informant’s son when he was going to depose in a case lodged against the petitioner. The contention on behalf of the petitioner is that in course of investigation, it came to light that the petitioner was made accused in Danapur P.S. Case no. 200/2003 but in the above stated case, deceased was not a witness and, therefore, entire genesis of the prosecution falls on the ground. It is further contended by him that according to the prosecution case itself, nine unknown persons committed murder of the deceased. Moreover, some co-accused persons have already been granted privilege of bail by this court. On the other hand, learned Addl. P.P. referred criminal antecedent of the petitioner but he could not succeed to controvert the above stated submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Rit Lal Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.C. Jha, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Danapur(Patna) in Bihta P.S. Case no. 280/2009. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)