1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.428 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.325 OF 2007 [Tetsyo Hiryama. Vs. Union of India & Anr.] ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, office : Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, : appearances, Court’s : orders or directions : and Registrar’s orders : ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Ayaz Khan, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.Vijay H. Kantharia, Adv. for Respondent No.1-U.O.I.. Mr.Y.S.Shinde, APP, for respondent No.2-State. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : DATED : DATED : 2nd May, 2008. P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant-orig.accused No.2 and the learned Counsel for the respondent-Union of India. 2. The applicant-orig.accused No.2 has been released on bail by this Court by order dated 10th April, 2008. While granting bail, inter alia condition came to be imposed on the 2 applicant that he shall be released on bail on executing bail bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties in the like amount. 3. The age of the applicant is 60 years. Despite being granted bail by this Court, the applicant is languishing in jail because he is not able to furnish two sureties in the sum of Rs.1 lakh. Moreover, the wife of the applicant who is making arrangement to furnish the surety is a cancer patient. It is stated that it is difficult to find two sureties in the sum of Rs.1 lakh. Hence, the learned Counsel for the applicant has prayed that instead of furnishing two sureties in the sum of Rs.1 lakh, the applicant may be allowed to furnish one surety in the sum of Rs.2 lakhs. The said submission is reasonable. Hence, I am inclined to modify the said condition of furnishing bail bond 3 in the sum of Rs.1 lakh with two sureties in the like amount, and instead the applicant now shall furnish bail bond of Rs.2 lakh with one surety in the like amount. Rest of the conditions of order dated 10th April, 2008 are maintained. 4. Application is disposed of accordingly. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]