IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. S. NARAYANA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1646 OF 2009 Between : Jangam Basavaiah .... Petitioner A N D 1. The State of A.P. 2. Smt J.Jyothi 3. Kum J.Shiva Kumar 4. Kum J.Sai Praneeth …Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1646 OF 2009 J U D G M E N T : This Criminal Revision Case filed by the petitioners under Sections 397 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, is directed against the order, dated 05.01.2009 in M.C. No.68 of 2007, on the file of III Additional District Judge, Warangal. 2. This Court ordered notice on 24.07.2009 to Respondent Nos.2 to 4 and the same had been served. Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are represented by Sri S.Lakshmi Kanth. Heard Sri Mohd. Ghulam Rasool, learned counsel representing the petitioners. 3. The main grievance of the petitioners is that without giving an opportunity to the petitioners, exparte order was straight away passed in M.C. No.68 of 2007. It is also stated that substantial amount had been recovered by way of attachment of salary. 4. The quantum of maintenance already recovered by respondents 2 to 4 by way of attachment of salary was not re-deposited. However, in asmuchas, it is stated that no opportunity had been given to the petitioners, the impugned order is hereby set aside and the matter is remitted to the learned III Additional District Judge, Warangal, to give an opportunity to both the parties and decide the matter afresh in accordance with law, at the earliest point of time. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed to the extent indicated above. ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J. February 22, 2010. YVL