IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No. 347 of 2011 Date of Decision: February 17, 2011 Roop Chand ..... Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others. .....Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. D.S. Nain, Advocate for Mr. Randeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajeev Parshad, DAG, Haryana for respondent-State. ***** JORA SINGH, J (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus with a roving writ for the release of detenues as mentioned in Para No. 3 of the petition from the illegal custody of respondents No.4 to 6. Reply filed by learned State counsel on the file and is to the effect that all the alleged detenues have left the brick kiln of respondents No.4 to 6. It has also been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the present petition has become infructuous as all the alleged detenues have since been released. In view of the abovesaid reply and the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. February 17, 2011 (JORA SINGH) sham JUDGE