1 ca10371.09 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10371 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO. 13192 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.109 OF 1996 [ Suryakant s/o Shankar & Ors. vs. Manika s/o Datta died LRs. Smt. Rukhminibai w/o Manikrao SOntakke & Ors. ] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mrs. S.G. Chincholkar, Advocate for applicants. Mr. B.G. Deshmukh, Advocate for R-1 to 8. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 1ST DECEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard the Counsel for the applicants. 2. This application is filed for condonation of delay and also for bringing legal heirs of deceased respondent on record. The application is vehemently 2 ca10371.09 opposed by the Counsel appearing for the proposed legal heirs of deceased respondent on the ground that, there is inordinate delay in filing the application. 3. Upon hearing the Counsel for the parties, admittedly there is no compliance of Order 22 Rule 10-A of the Code of Civil Procedure by the Counsel for the respondent. Therefore, no fault can be attributed to the applicants. 4. In the light of explanation offered in para-2 and 3 of the Civil Application, same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) (B) and (C) and same stands disposed of. . Necessary steps to be taken within three weeks from today. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/DEC11