1 ABAG-45.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.45 OF 2011 Vijay Anant Gawankar alias Bapan .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.46 OF 2011 Sushanth Raut .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.47 OF 2011 Mangesh Sakharam Tiwarkar .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.48 OF 2011 Anil Sakharam Tiwarkar .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.49 OF 2011 Nandkumar Lahu Raut .... Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .... Respondent 2 ABAG-45.11 Ms Gayatri Singh for the Applicant in all applications. Ms S.D. Shinde, APP, for the State in all applications. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JANUARY 27, 2011 P.C: Criminal Application Nos.48 and 49 of 2011 are taken up on board on request. 2. These five applicants in the five applications seek anticipatory bail. They have been named in the FIR at two places as involved in the assault of one Ravindra Nachankar and the police personnel who tried to extricate him as also part of the mob of 250-300 persons which had started pelting stones on police vehicles and injured police officers. Pravin Gavankar, the leader of the mob, had also sought anticipatory bail. His application was rejected. The learned APP informs that the SLP is also dismissed. Considering the role of the present applicants, which is greater than that of Pravin Gavankar who was only instigating these persons to participate in the riot, the applicants are not entitled to bail. The 3 ABAG-45.11 applications are, therefore, rejected. 3. The learned counsel for the applicants requests that the applicants may be given three weeks' time to take the matters further. Since the leader of the mob had already taken the matter further and the result is before this Court, there is no question of granting further time. The request is rejected. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)