IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.1132 of 2010 (M/S) Sachin Sajwan (Minor) .…Petitioner Versus Board of Schools Education ...Respondents Mr. G.S. Negi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. Seema Sirohi, Advocate for the respondent. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to the respondent to re-examine/revaluate the answer sheet of the Hindi, Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry subjects of the petitioner bearing Roll No.056844 for Intermediate Examination, 2010. Further prayer has been made by the petitioner to expedite scrutiny of the petitioner’s answer sheet of Hindi, Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was regular student of Class XIIth in the Inter College, Guptkashi, District-Rudraprayag and his roll number was 056844. He appeared in the Uttarakhand Intermediate Examination-2010 with subjects; Hindi, English, Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner written all answers correctly in all the papers as per his ability. The respondent declared the result of the Intermediate Examination and mark sheet was issued to the petitioner by which the petitioner came to know that marks awarded to 2 him in all the subjects were very less and below his expectation. He also submitted that petitioner is a meritorious student and his academic career is very good. Even in class Xth examination he secured 76% marks in the Board Examination. He prayed that his answer sheet be re- examined/revaluated. As far as re-examination/revaluation of answer sheet is concerned, the same direction cannot be issued in view of the fact that there is no rule which provide revaluation and also in view of the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court reported in (1984)4 Supreme Court Cases 27 Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education vs. Paritosh Bhupeshkumar Seth & Others. Therefore, prayer of the petitioner for revaluation is rejected. However, since the petitioner has applied for the scrutiny and deposited the required fee in time, respondent is directed to expedite the scrutiny and declare the result of the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of the order. The writ petition is disposed of. Interim Relief Application No.5329 of 2010 also stands disposed of. (V.K.Bist. J,) 06.07.2010 Arti 3