IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11155 of 2010 1. KUMARI SUPRIYA BHARATI W/O RUPESH KUMAR R/O VILL.- PACHANT, P.S.- BELDAUR, DISTT.- KHAGARIA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPTT., BIHAR, PATNA 3. MEMBERS DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KHAGARIA 4. THE COLLECTOR, KHAGARIA, BIHAR 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, KHAGARIA 6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, BELDAUR, KHAGARIA 7. THE HEAD MASTER, MIDDLE SCHOOL PANCHAYAT, ANCHAL- BELDAUR, DISTT.- KHAGARIA 8. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ PACHAUT ANCHAL- BELDAUR, KHAGARIA, BIHAR ----------- 2 16/03/2011 There is a clear and categorical finding recorded by the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Khagaria that even though the petitioner was engaged as a Pachayat Shiksha Mitra for eleven months in the year 2005, there was no decision taken to extend or renew the contract after expiry of eleven months. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws my attention to the certificates issued by the so called Headmaster of the School in question to show that she has been working regularly and there is certification in this regard issued by the Headmaster coupled with the - 2 - attendance register which has also been annexed as Annexure-6 series. Those are collateral circumstance and whether the same were produced before the Appellate Authority is not known. But one thing is clear that there is nothing on record to show that the findings given by the Appellate Authority has to be disbelieved because no clear evidence is being brought or has been brought on record to show that after expiry of eleven months’ contract period, any renewal was made in favour of the petitioner. If that be so, the findings and conclusions reached by the Appellate Authority are not erroneous. This writ application has no merit. It is dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)