6% aw“ .2, (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 428 WRIT PETITION S NO. 12007 .(1 1. Om Prakash Singh Rajput S/o Shri Narottam Singh Age about 42 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. Middle School, Takiyapara, Biock - Durg, Distt. — Durg (C.G.) ' r 2. Kundan La!Sahu S/o Shri Dhani Ram Sahu Age about 43 years, AssistantTeache‘r, Govt. Primary School, Dhanora, Block - Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) 3. Smt. Shahnaj Baksha W/o R. R. Baksha Age about 46 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary Schooi, Kaiibadi, Block - Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) Smt. Girija Turiyakar W/o S'hri Rohit Singh Turiyakar Aged about 57 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary Schooi, Potiyakaia, Biock - Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) Jikar Mohammad Memon S/o Shri Waii Mohammad Age about 51 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. Primary School, Potiyakala, Block - Durg, Distt. — Durg (C.G.) Smt. Chitralekha Deshmukh W/o Shri Sanat Kumar Deshmukh Aged about 44 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. Primary School, Potiyakala, Block - Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) PETITIONERS 7. Smt lnuala Slngh db W/o Shri Way Pratap Smgh Aged aboui 49 years ASSIstantTeacher Govt. Primary School, Jhugglpara, Block - Qurg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) Smt. Manisha Jha W/o Late Shri R. D. Jha Aged about 45 years, AssistantTeache‘i’, Govt. Primary SchooL Potiyakala, Block - Durg>,‘Distt. - Durg (C.G.) , 9. Smt. Devki sahu W/o Shri Pankaj Sahu Aged about 43 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. Primary School, Newai, Bhilai Block - Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) t VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1 State of Chhattisgarh Through :- Secretary, School Education Department, Mantr‘alaya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer District Education Office, Distt. - Dyrg (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Block Education Office, Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA @ HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BIQSPUR LPIS) M, 428 $8: Hon'ble Mr. Jusi‘ice satish K. Agniho'tri. J Present Mr. Rnkesh Anfhony, Advocafe for the peti‘rioner(s). Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyar, for fhe respondmfs/S‘mfa. O R D E R (Passed on fhis 23" Day of January, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for *he pe‘ri'rioners as we" as for ‘rhe Sim/rewdenfs jo'm'rly album fhaf the fads of fhe presen'r writ pemion aée simiinr +o rim of in w. P. (s) No. 5976/2006 (Sushi: Tiwari and others vs. S'rafe Governmenf of Chharrisgarh & o‘rhers), which was allowed vlde order dafed 7.11.2006. They further submif fha'r 'l'he quesfion of law involved is also fhe some. 2. In view of 1'he above-$fa1éd albmissions made by learned counsel for 1he parties, the wri'r pe'rifion is allowed in terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by this Court in WP. (5.) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State éovernment of Chhattisgarh di others). No order as to costs. Sd/- . Satish K. Agnihotrl Judge Subbu ’ Pefifioner-s : Om Pmknd'n Singh Rajpuf & Versus