IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2986 of 2010 PUSHPA DEVI, WIFE OF MANOJ KUMAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-BERAR, POLICE STATION-BIKRAM, DISTRICT-PATNA. …..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. WITH Cr.Misc. No.5187 of 2010 NARAYAN SINGH, SON OF LATE SURYADYAL SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PATAUNA, POLICE STATION-PALIGANJ, DISTRICT-PATNA. …..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioners : Mr. Prabhakar Singh (Adv.). : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan (Adv.). For the State : Mr. I. B. Pandey (APP) : Mr. S.M. Rahman (APP). ----------- 02/ 16.02.2010 Since both the above bail applications have arisen out of one occurrence i.e. Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 126/2009 under Section 302/201 of the Indian Penal Code, are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The informant’s daughter was being pressurized by her husband and in-laws in connection with demand of one motorcycle, gold chain and other costly articles by way of additional dowry. She was killed and it was suspected that the petitioners might be involved in commission of the offence. Submission is that the petitioner Pushpa Devi is ‘Gotni’ of the deceased and 2 she had no concerned with the day-to-day activities. The petitioner Narayan Singh is a distant relative of the deceased and he was not at all involved in the family affairs of the deceased. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners are directed to be released from custody on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur/successor court in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 126 of 2009. kksinha/ ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)