IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15265 of 2009 ANUP SINGH @ GOPAL SINGH, SON OF NARPATI SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-LOHA, P.S. SONO, DISTRICT-JAMUI………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………………………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Bharat Lal, Advocate. For the State : Mr. R.P.S. Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 4. 29.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in a case registered under Sections 341/342/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code besides Sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in the First Information Report itself, it has been stated that though the informant was all along with the police on the whole night but he has filed a written report on the next date and not on the date of occurrence. It is further submitted that doctor has opined that the injuries were not due to explosion of bomb rather the same were caused by fire arms. It is stated that there is admitted enmity between the parties and the informant is the uncle of the petitioner. The wife of the petitioner had already 2 filed a complaint case against the informant and others, one month prior to the occurrence. Learned A.P.P. for the State submitted that it is manifest from the injury report that all were splinter injuries and there is direct allegation against this petitioner of exploding bomb causing injury to the informant. It is also stated that all the injuries were grievous. In the facts and the circumstances of the case and also in view of the fact that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of hurling bomb upon the informant causing grievous injury to him, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner for the present. As a result, this application is dismissed. However, if so advised, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after a period of six months. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)