^MS^ ^:: StNGLEBENCH t2a2- -53F' .>. ^^^g^2 dated....... Q '777^""f'"7"<"'A"='i dated IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE BILASPUR '.9X' W.P. No^"'u-' /2006 PETITIONER w P D Gupta, S/o Late B L Gupta, aged about 50 Years, R/o Forest Colony, Khandgawaon, Distt. - Korea. —-^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through / Secretary Forest Department, D K S Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipiir, Distt. Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Conservator of Forest, Forest• OfBce, Surguja, Distt. Surguja (C.G.). 3. Mr. Tahmir Ahmed, aged about 45 ^ years, R/o Kusumi East Sarguja Forest Division, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 8s 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 tfTHfff a»*1Tcb 3^^IF(1?PT, !!iTny'IS,I°l<11<iy ^..^J.^:'.^ 200 3TT^?TMa<ti (^cit^<sii,<T) 3T[^T qiT l^-litb tRT 3I)^T stitliti c ?^IRRflfeT3TI^T ^:5.2006~ Mr. Aneedi Dubey, Adv. for| Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Dy. $.A. Heard. By the instant petition the Khadgcwon, Forest Division Koriaj 7.7.2006 (Annexure P-6) whereb^) Forest Division, Sarguja. Learned counsel for the pet| daughter ore suffering from ortl| impugned is bad. It is settled law that the when the same is outcome of No such violation is there, therefoj it is hereby dismissed. However, if the petitioner'| problem, then he is at iiberty to 10 days from todoy and in turn, of the petitioner within o period representation in accordance with petitioner. Consequently, M.C^.)P. No.3^ |the petitioner. the State on advance copy. +l'i|?cl<fl-f t||t|riTft'fel&<Rl^l<, ^srf^irsn^T fdr (letitioner, who is working as Forest Ranger, has challenged his transfer order dated he has been transferred to Kusmi East, (tioner orgued that the petitioner's wife and ortl|iopedic problem and therefore, the order tr^ansfer' can be challenged only on the ground malofide and passed a9ainst the statutory rules. )[&, the petition is liable to be dismissed and '^ tift'fe and daughter are having orthopedic representction to respondent No.2 within ^pondent No.2 to decide the representation 30 days from the date of receipt of the IOHI aft'er considering the point raised by the mdke reR 4f 105/06 also stands dismissed. ..^r ^•"^e P.T.O. ^ NSBS^