^ l^ \sr-6^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (Sl No. ?"4^Lf<T /2011 PETITIONER .A< w- ^'y. vy'.^ y RESPONDENTS : ^ K.C. Chauhan S/o. Shri K.R. Chauhan Aged about 53 years, R/o. presently posted and working as Head Master Middle School, Ranpur, Block -Jashpur Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Coinmissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Pt. Ravi Shankar Shukla premises Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) ^ 4. Shri I.L Chauhan, father's name and age not known to the petition.er, presently posted as lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Beharchua, Korba, Distt. Korba. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 --^ ^ HIGH CQURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BIL^PUR PETITIONER WRITPETmON(S) No. 1745 of 2011 K.C.Chauhan. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. X9. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF DN'DIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri. J. Present: Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate (jeneral forthe State/ respondent No. 1 to 3. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 31st day ofMareh, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was mitiaUy appointed as Assistant Teachsr on 29.0.1981 and subsequently, promoted to the post of Head Master on 13.10.2008. 'Iliereafter, his name has not been included in the sradation list and he has been denied opportunity ofconsideration fbr fiuther promotion on the ground that his name is not in the gradation list. Shri Thakur fiirther subnuts that the petitioner has made several representations, recently on 04.12.2009 (Aimexure P/5) and 10.08.2010 (Aimexure P/8). Till date, no action has been taken on the said representations. On 23.09.2009, on the eariier application, even Uie Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Wetfare Department, Jashpur, has written to the Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur for doing the needfal. 2. The respondent No. 2 i.e. the Commissionsr, it appears, is sitting over tightly over the rqiresentation of the petitioner, wliieh prima facie appsars to be a right&l ciaim. Why the Cominissioner is sitting on it and other applications, is bsyond ones understanding. 3. Thus, with the consent ofthe leamed Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondent No. 1 to 3, the respondent No. 2 is directed to consider and decide the representation/application filed by the pstitioner, as aforestated, at the earliest as eariy as possible, prefsrably within a period of &ur weeks from today, in accordance with law, on its own merits. 4. With the aforesaid observation and directioti, the writ petition is -disposed of. 1