1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 16308 of 2008 alongwith CWP(T) Nos.16299, 16300, 16301, 16302, 16303, 16304, 16305, 16306, 16307, 16309, 16310 and 16319 of 2008. Date of decision: 27.7.2010 1. CWP(T) No. 16308 of 2008 Chuhar Singh .. Petitioner. Vs. C.S.K.H.P. Krishi Vishva Vidyalaya, Palampur & others …. Respondents. 2. CWP(T) No. 16299 of 2008 Shiv Raj .. Petitioner. Vs. C.S.K.H.P. Krishi Vishva Vidyalaya, Palampur & others …. Respondents. 3. CWP(T) No. 16300 of 2008 Dhani Ram .. Petitioner. Vs. C.S.K.H.P. Krishi Vishva Vidyalaya, Palampur & others …. Respondents. 4. CWP(T) No. 16301 of 2008 Bhim Singh .. Petitioner. Vs. C.S.K.H.P. Krishi Vishva Vidyalaya, Palampur & others …. Respondents. 5. CWP(T) No. 16302 of 2008 Parshotam Chand .. Petitioner. Vs. C.S.K.H.P. Krishi Vishva Vidyalaya, Palampur & others …. Respondents. 6. CWP(T) No. 16303 of 2008 Bishan Dass .. Petitioner. Vs. C.S.K.H.P. Krishi Vishva Vidyalaya, Palampur & others …. Respondents. 7. CWP(T) No. 16304 of 2008 Sunil Kumar .. Petitioner. Vs. C.S.K.H.P. Krishi Vishva Vidyalaya, Palampur & others …. Respondents. 8. CWP(T) No. 16305 of 2008 Krishan Kumar .. Petitioner. Vs. C.S.K.H.P. Krishi Vishva Vidyalaya, Palampur & others …. Respondents. 9. CWP(T) No. 16306 of 2008 Piar Chand .. Petitioner. Vs. C.S.K.H.P. Krishi Vishva Vidyalaya, Palampur & others …. Respondents. 2 10. CWP(T) No. 16307 of 2008 Shankar Ram .. Petitioner. Vs. C.S.K.H.P. Krishi Vishva Vidyalaya, Palampur & others …. Respondents. 11. CWP(T) No. 16309 of 2008 Amar Chand .. Petitioner. Vs. C.S.K.H.P. Krishi Vishva Vidyalaya, Palampur & others …. Respondents. 12. CWP(T) No. 16310 of 2008 Kishori Lal .. Petitioner. Vs. C.S.K.H.P. Krishi Vishva Vidyalaya, Palampur & others …. Respondents. 13. CWP(T) No. 16319 of 2008 Pratap Singh .. Petitioner. Vs. C.S.K.H.P. Krishi Vishva Vidyalaya, Palampur & others …. Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioners : Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Lokender Thakur, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.3. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) All the petitioners approached this Court with certain grievances regarding regularization in service. According to the petitioners since there was no valid seniority list prepared based on the circular dated 5.9.1985, they have been put to serious prejudice and ineligible persons have been placed in the seniority above them in the process. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents admits that there is no final seniority list, therefore, it will be appropriate that a proper 3 seniority list is drawn at the earliest. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of, directing the first respondent to draw a proper seniority list of daily waged workers based on Annexure R-1 circular referred to above and any other relevant instructions, within a period of four months from today, based on the seniority list thus drawn up, consequential action shall also be taken in regularizing the regularization already made from the eligible dates. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice July 27, 2010 (Justice Kuldip Singh), (sks/grs) Judge.