IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.35049 of 2010 ARBIND PRASAD, SON OF SRI BHIKHAM PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – MANPUR, P.O. AND P.S. HILSA, DISTRICT – NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF. …………………… PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………………… OPP. PARTY. ----------- 02/ 07.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail for offence under section 47(A) of the Excise Act regarding recovery of three thousand illicit liquor and in the form of seizure shows the place of seizure as from the accused Sanjay, Pramod and Arbind. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, contended that in column 7 of the remarks column there is mention that the seizure has been made from the brick kiln of the accused no. 1 and 2. However, Arbind has been shown to be fleeing away form the place of occurrence. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, if the petitioner surrender and pray for regular bail then his case may be considered without being prejudiced of this order. Kundan (Gopal Prasad, J.)