IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated 15.2.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.44740 of 2006 S.Vijayaragavan ...Petitioner/ Applicant -Vs.- 1.The Secretary to Government, Rural Development Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The District Collector, Thanjavur. ... Respondents/ Respondents Original Application No.5720 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying to issue a direction directing the respondents to regularise the applicant's service with effect from 21.4.1980 with all consequential service and monetary benefits. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. For petitioner : No appearance For respondent : Mr.B.Vijay Government Advocate. O R D E R Original Application No.5720 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying to issue a direction directing the respondents to regularise the applicant's service with effect from 21.4.1980 with all consequential service and monetary benefits. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. 2. No appearance for the petitioner. Learned Government Advocate submits that the relief sought for according to the learned Government Advocate, a proposal has been sent by the second respondent District Collector to the first respondent for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ considering the claim of the petitioner for regularisation from the date of appointment. 3. From the records it is seen that on 8.6.1998 such proposal has been sent for regularisation of the service of the petitioner from the date of appointment. If the proposal has already been considered and disposed off on merits, there will be no grievance for the petitioner. However, if the proposal has not been considered and disposed off on merits, the first respondent is directed to consider and dispose off the same within a reasonable period of time. Petitioner is permitted to make a further representation if the grievance of the petitioner still subsists and the same shall be considered and disposed off on merits and in accordance with law. The Writ Petition stands disposed off on the above terms. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar. ts To 1.The Secretary to Government, Rural Development Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The District Collector, Thanjavur. W.P.No.44740 of 2006 KSK (CO) kk 3/3 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/