IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. SECOND APPEAL NO.1044 OF 2004. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7567 OF 2004. Shankar Vithoba Markad and ors. .... APPELLANTS. VERSUS Janabai Shankar Markad. .... RESPONDENTS. ... Shri A.M. Gaikwad, Advocate for Appellant/s. ... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 18th JUNE, 2009. PER COURT: 1. The present second appeal arises out of judgment and decree dated 30th January,2001 passed by the 3rd Addl. District Judge, Ahmednagar in R.C.A. No.153 of 1996 arising out judgment and decree dated 28th February, 1996 passed by the Jt. C.J.J.D., Pathardi in R.C.S.No.14 of 1993. The present respondent is original plaintiff who filed R.C.S. NO.14 of 1993 praying for monthly maintenance of Rs.1000/-. The suit filed by the plaintiff came to be decreed and it was directed that Rs.400/- per month should be paid to the plaintiff wife. 2. Being aggrieved, the present appellants filed R.C.A. No. 153 of 1996 before the District Judge, Ahmednagar. The lower appellate Court, after framing necessary issues and after hearing the parties to the appeal, confirmed the judgment and decree passed by the lower court. Against the said judgment and order, this second appeal is filed. 3. The learned Counsel for the appellants submits that appellant no.1 herein namely Shankar Vithoba Markad, husband of the respondent died on 15.10.2006. According to the learned Counsel for appellants, since the appellant no.1 husband has died, there is no question of enforcing the decree passed by the lower court. 4. In my considered view, there are concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below, by which it was ordered that Janabai w/o Shankar Markad was entitled for maintenance of Rs.400/- per month. No interference is called for. No substantial question of law arises for consideration of this Court. Second Appeal is dismissed. Civil Application stands disposed of. [ S.S. SHINDE, J ] ...