s m-f HIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLESHRIRAJEEVGUPTA,CJ.& HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. ADDellant/ Applicant Respondent M.A. (CLNo. 1549 of 2009 Smt Aparna Daniej, Aged about 39 years, Wd/o Arpan Daniel, R/o Kranti Rishi, 1Q1, In front of Minonite Church, Tulsipur, Ward no.15, Rajnandgaon (CG) VERSUS Union of India, Through the General Manager, South East Central Railway, BJIaspuri(CG) Misc.ADpeal U/S.23ofthe RailwavClaimsTribunal Act. 1987 Present: ShriAnil Mourya,Advocate fortheappellant. Ms. Naushina Afrin Ali, Advocate for the respondent. ORDER (4th March, 2010) The foliowing order of tf^Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, CJ. Ms. Naushina Afrin Ali, learned counsel for the respondent refemng to sub-Section (1) of Section 23 of the RaiJways Clajms Tribunal Act, 1987, has raised a preliminary objection about the maintainability of the present appeal before the High Court of Chhattisgarh as the impugned judgment has been passed by Bhopal Bench pf Railways Claims Tribunal, which is located within the territorial jurisdiction of Madhya Pradesh High Court. IUl-1. 2) Shri Anil Mourya, learned counsel for the appeliant, in view of theabove preliminaryobjection, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal with the liberty of filing another appeal before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. 3) Permission granted. 4) With the above liberty, theappeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5) The Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned judgment to learned counsel for the appellant immediately. ; R.N. Chandrakar Sd/- Chief Justice subbu Judge ^-^ r