IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12445 of 2009 MEETHA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 5/10/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The grievance in this application relates to a consideration for appointment as an Angan Bari Sevika in the newly created Angan Bari Centre, Nawadah (South) under Gram Panchayat Raj Mohanpur Panchayat, district- Jamui. The submission is that after the State authorities found the appointment of respondent No.8 to be bad in law, the petitioner having ventilated her grievances during the period of the life of the panel, i.e., one year, she deserved to be appointed. It is fairly acknowledged that the guidelines framed for appointment of Angan Bari Sevikas contains adequate remedies for the petitioner before the District Magistrate under Clause-10 of the same and thereafter before the Divisional Commissioner under Clause-11A and, if necessary, before the Commissioner-cum- Secretary of the Social Welfare Department and Director, I.C.D.S. under Clause-11B. In that light leave is sought to withdraw the application to pursue the 2 alternative remedies available which, this Court also considers to be more efficacious where questions of facts can be more appropriately considered with the observation that if the petitioner prefers any such representation before the authority as discussed above the same is required to be decided and disposed in the light of the guidelines framed for such recruitment within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)