IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11205 of 2007 AJAY KUMAR SAHANI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 15/05/2009 Leave is sought to withdraw the application to pursue his grievance before the Appellate Authority. The appointment on the post of Shiksha Mitra with which the petitioner is aggrieved and which he alleges was wrongly denied to him was made on 29.1.2003. The duration of the appointment was for eleven months only. The contractual period of this appointment expired on 29.12.2004. The petitioner then filed this writ application in the year-2007. After 29.12.2004 the cause of action of the petitioner came to an end as rights for renewal thereof were an inchoate right. To that extent, this Court considers it necessary to clarify that the petitioner has no case to adjudicate for his appointment. However, the issue of any alleged appointment illegally made on the post of Shiksha Mitra and its leading to such appointee acquiring the status of a Panchayat Shikshak on 1.7.2006 is an entirely different issue. If the petitioner raises any issues with regard to such illegal appointment and continuance, the Appellate Authority shall decide the same in accordance 2 with law after hearing all concerned. It is clarified that the absence of any cause of action in the petitioner with regard to his own appointment is completely different from the right of the petitioner to assail the appointment and continuance of another illegally. The application is disposed with the aforesaid observations to be decided by the Appellate Authority. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)