HIGH COURT OF CHHARTTISGARH AT BILASPUR Coram:- Hon’ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra & Hon’ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar, JJ Writ Petition (S) No. 6453 of 2010 Petitioners x/: L, 1. Vijay Kumar Patel, aged about 38 years, scn of Shri Tulsi Ram, R/o‘ Mahewa, Tah Wadrafnagar, DistL Surguja, Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra — Mahewa, Distt. Surguja (President, C.G. shashkiya Aupcharik Shikshak Sangh) 2. Ramesh Kumar Pradhan, aged about 44 years, son of Shri Saniram Pradhan, Rlo Be!sari, Takhatpur, Distt. Biiaspur, Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra — Beisari Takhatpur, Distt Bilaspur (Secretary, €13. Shashkiya Aupcharik Shikshak Sangh) 3. Shankar La! Sahu, aged about 45 years, son of Shri Gulab Ram Sahu, R/o Bhainsbod, Po. Anwari, Tah. Kurud Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra — Beisari (Treasurer, C.G. Shashkiya Aupcharik Shikshak Sangh) ¥ 4. Gulab Chand Sahu, aged about ’54 years, son of Shri Umendram Sahu, Rio Marda, Tah. Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra — Marda, Tah Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur. 5. Smt. Katawati Chouhan, aged about 36 years, wife of Shri Hemani Kumar, R/o Ranpur, Tah. Bagicha Distt. Jashpur Shaskiya Aupcharik Kendra e Ranpur, Dtstt. Jashpur (Sah-Saohiv, C.G. Shashkiya Aupcharik Shikshak Sangh) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Social Wetfare, Dau Kaiyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) $tate ot Madhya Pradesh — through the Secretary, Department of School Education, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP) tate of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Deptt. of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Respondents. 4. Uniun of India, through the Secretary, Department of Human Resources Deveiopment, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. Director, Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) Writ Petition under Article 2261227 of the Constitution of india Present: Shri Arun Shukla, counsel for the petitioners. Shri U.N.S. Deo. Govt. Advocate for the State. L Smt. Fouzia Mirza, Assistant Solicitor General for Union of lndia/respondent No. 4. aral Order (Passed on 11‘“ November, 201a) Per Dhirendra Mishra, J:- (1) By this petition, petitioners have challenged the constitutional vatidity of the provisions of Chhattisgarh Panchayat Samvida Shala Shikshak (Employment and Conditions of Contract) Rutes, 2005, (for short, 'Rules, 2005'). (2) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the constitutional validity of the Rules, 2005, has already been examined in Writ Petition No. 1893/2005 (Shaskiya Aupcharikettar Shikshak Sangh & Anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected writ petitions and the same has been disposed of vide order dated 11*” August, 2010 (Annexure P-4). .He further submits that this petition may also be‘disposed of in the simitar terms. {3) The above prayer is not opposed by learned Govt. Advocate for the State. (4) Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 1 1‘“ August, 2010 (Annexure P-4) passed in Writ Petition No. 1893/2005 (Shaskiya Aupcharikettar Shikshak Sangh & Anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected writ petitions. \t Sd/- ”Isa/— Dhirendra Mishra l RANGANATH CHANDRAKAR, Judge “it? \fljay , , 2