..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2701 OF 2008 Vijendra Vijay Naralkar. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.Nilesh B. Pawaskar, Adv. i/b. Aparna Vatkar, Adv. for applicant. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 14th August,2008. DATED : 14th August,2008. DATED : 14th August,2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.434 of 2008 of Vakola Police Station. The said case is mainly under Sections 420, 460, 467, 468 of IPC. 3. The applicant was working with the complainant. It is the case of the prosecution that the applicant stole a cheque-book of the complainant, forged signatures of the complainant and withdrew an amount of Rs.3.50 lakh from the ..(2).. bank. The evidence collected from the bank shows that the applicant had come to withdraw the amount from the bank. An amount of Rs.1.70 lakh has been recovered at the instance of the applicant. In the present case, the investigation is going on. Looking to the material on record and the fact that the investigation is going on I do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail at this stage. Application for bail is rejected. 4. Liberty to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail before the Sessions Court after the charge-sheet is filed. On such an application being made the learned Sessions Judge shall hear the matter afresh and dispose it of on merits. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)