^ A c (S) ^\^r IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR P. N0. ^ ^^ 6" / 2 00 2 PETITIONER : RESPONDENTS ,.^-^^ ;-.•*"*'. v^v '- .. K'^^~ ^ffi'"' cp^ Rikhi Ram Khunte (Head Master), S/o. Shri Teej Ram Khunte, aged about 56 years, R/o. Aurda, P.S.H. & Tahsil-Kharsia, District-Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary TribalWelfare Department, D. K. Bhawan, Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) 2. Addl. Commissioner Tribal Welfare & Development Department, Raigarh (C.G.) ;"??i.,. / ..•' ^y ^. ,.-......^-..:L -^. '.l y (i i:y^^\^-^^ Chief Executive Officer V^e\[^"^// Raigarh, %..^^^;€": ^7 District-Raigarh (C,..G.) ^^-^w \ ^' PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226f^27 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 'fci HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTI8GARH: BILASPUR Sing^e Bench: Hon»bleShri Satish K. Agpihotri, J. W. P. No. 2706 OF 2002 Petitioner : Rikhi Ram Khunte Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh 8& Ofhers Shri J,K, Shastod, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Paakaj Shrivastava, Paiiel lawyer for the respondents No. 1 and 2. Shri Saatosh Bharat, counsel for respondent No.3. ORAL ORDBR (8th March, 2006) 1. I.A. No. 2691/2006, appUcation is aUowed. 2. Accordiagly, the writ petition is disniissed as wifhdrawn. No order as to costs. '^ SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ^^ -o' ^ / ^ /