IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 04.10.2010 COCP No.1843 of 2010 (O&M) Amarjit Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus S.M.Sharma ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioners is that the amount already recovered prior to the order of recovery was set aside, has not been refunded. A perusal of the order by the Division Bench of this Court shows that only the order of recovery was set aside. The petitioners have initiated the present contempt proceedings after more than five years and when there is no specific direction in respect of refund of the amount already recovered. In view of the said fact, I do not find that any ground for initiation of contempt proceedings, is made out. However, it shall be open to the petitioners to establish their claim in appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. Disposed of. 04.10.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE