WP(C) 3298/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. MH Rajbarbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner an d Mr. P Roy, learned State Counsel, Assam also representing the Chief Executive Officer, Cachar Zilla Parishad, Cachar. The petitioner, who claims to be a settlement holder of Berenga Cattle Market (hereafter for short referred to as the Market), had approached th is Court to invoke its writ jurisdiction challenging the validity of the Tender Notice (NIT) dated 14.05.2010 issued by the Cachar Zilla Parishad (for short her eafter also referred to as the Zilla Parishad), initiating a process of settleme nt relating thereto along with other markets. According to the petitioner, havi ng regard to the estimated value of the said Market, the Zilla Parishad had no a uthority to issue the NIT in view of the relevant provisions of the Assam Pancha yat Act, 1994, (for short referred to as the Act) as well as the decision of a F ull Bench of this Court in Harez Ali & Anr. Vs. The State of Assam & Ors., 2009 (2) GLT 561. This Court while issuing notice on 11.06.2010, on noticing the a bove, had, in the interim, stayed the operation of the impugned sale notice. Mr. Roy submits on instructions that in the attending facts and circumstances, the grievance of the petitioner is well founded and thus the impu gned sale notice is untenable. In the above view of the matter, this petition stands disposed b y quashing the impugned sale notice dated 14.05.2010 (Annexure 7 to the writ pet ition). No costs.