HIGH COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH AT B£LASPUR w. P, No.2249 qf2005 Petitioner Prabhati Lai AgrwaL S/o Late Umrao La! Goya}, aged about 66 years. Dccupatian — Promietor, Anand Rice Mi“. Dhanatari, (6.6.) - Versus Respondents 1. Tekram Sinha. S/o 3m Shivcharan Sinha. R/o Rampur Ward. Tah.~ Biiaspun District- BitaspurCG. 2. The Presiding Officer, Labour Scurt, Raipun Exetcising the Pewers o? Commissioner for workmen’s Compensation, Raipur. WRH' PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 225!227 OF THE WNSTETUTSON GF tNDiA $3: Hon'Me Mr. Just€ce Satish K. Agnihotri $hri Rakesh Pandey, Advocafe for the petitioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer f0: :he respondents. 0 R D E R (Passsd an this 18‘“ day of ApriL 2007) 1. Learned counse} appearing for the petitioner. on instructions. prays for permission of this Court to withdraw this pe‘tition‘ with riberty to take recourae to the alternative remedy that may be avaiiable to the petitioner, under rhe raw. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State has no ob}ection. 3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. with the aforestated iiberty. Consequently. M(W)P No. 181 6!2005 Stands disposed of. k l Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge , Thekur