IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 12th day of October, 2011 1st Bail Application No.859 of 2011 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Shamshad, S/o Suleman R/o Village-Jainpur, P.S. Laksar, District Hardwar. ………Applicant Versus tate of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party S Arising out of Case Crime No. 178 of 2011, Under Section 147, 148, 149, 332, 186, 353, 342, 504, 506,34 I.P.C. and under Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station- Kotwali Laksar, istrict –Hardwar. D Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Manish Arora Advocate and Mr. S.K.Shandilya, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder, present for the State. Heard. Applicant Shamshad, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 178 of 2011, relating to offences punishable under Section 147, 148, 149, 332, 186, 353, 342, 504, 506 read with Section 34 I.P.C., and one punishable under Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station- Kotwali Laksar, District Hardwar, has sought his release on bail. 2 Applicant is not named in the First Information Report. It is pleaded that there is not injury to any policeman, in the incident. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that applicant has no criminal history. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion, as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Shamshad, be released on bail, on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Laksar. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 12.10.2011 JM