MrWPl'illWIS'l^ S;f: H;'^^g^? ^K-^:v^f'Sy-. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BIIASPUR Writ Petition fC) No. 2978 of 2009 Petitioner Ramayaa Prasad Suiyavaashi, S/o Sbri Bundrani SiuYavanshi, aged about 28 years, R/o ViUage and post Gaatura, Tahsil Masturi, Dist. BilaspUT(C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretaiy, Dept of Revenue, Maatralaya, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) Adun Jati Anusatidhau. avam Prashikshan. Sausfhaa Raipur behiad Paadit RavishaakaT Shukla Vishwavidalay, Raipur(C.G.) CbUector, Bilaspur, Dist Bilaspur (C.G.) Director/President GIiUattisgarh High Level CasteScnifiay Coiniaittee, Dist Raipur (C.G.) 2. 3. 4. (Writ Petition Under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agiuliotii J.) Shri Atul Paiidey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Suigh Thakur, Deputy Advocate Cteneral with Shri Alok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for fhe respondents. ORDERforaU (Passed on fhis 25ffi day ofJune,2Q09) Heard. 1. Shri Yashwaut Singh Thakur, leamed Deputy Advocate General appearuig for the respoudents No. 1 and 2/State subuuts that if the petitioner files aa application for verificatioii of his caste ia the given profonaa along with required docuiuents, fhe Scrutiny CoTnTnittee shall consider the Gase of fhe petitioner and pass appropriate order wifhiu a period of four weeks frqin the date ofpresentation ofthe representation. Shri Atul Paudey, leanied counsel appearing for the petitioaer subraits that fhe petitioner wfll appear before the Caste Scrutiay Goiainittee on 1st July, 2009 along with all fhe necessaiy docuuients to estabUsh his status. It is ordered accorduigly. Caste 4. 5. Thalmr Having regard to the facts situation ofthe case, it is directed fhat one post shaU. be kept vacant for a period of five weeks fi-oin today. In view of fhe foregoiiig, fhe writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ? I SatishK.Agnihotrtl Judge ^