IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 21ST MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 17993 OF 2008(S) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 17/07/2007 IN EA.33/03 IN EP.28/03 IN OP.76/1994 OF FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLA PETITIONER(S): --------------- ANNAMMA PAULOSE AGED 59 YEARS, W/O. M.C.PAULOSE. MARANGATTU, NIRANAM P.O.,KADAPRA VILLAGE, PATHNAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. HELEN VARGHESE, ROSE VILLA, PANDALAM P.O. 2. P.D.VARGHESE PUTHENPURACKAL HOUSE, MEZHUVELI VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. R1 BY ADVS. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN , K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR, M.R.JAYAPRASAD & P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.J.FRANCIS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12.2.1997 IN O.P. 76/1994 OF THE DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA. EXT.P2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE CLAIM PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN E.A. .... IN E.P. ....IN O.P. (DIV.) 76/94. EXT.P3 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN E.A. ... IN O.P. 76/1994. EXT.P4 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.7.2007 IN E.A. 33/03 OF THE FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLA. EXT.P5 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 27.11.2007 IN W.P.(C) 25660/07 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXT.P6 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER DATED 24.3.2008 IN E.A. 33/03 OF THE FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLA. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. // TRUE COPY // P.S. TO JUDGE. KN C/- P.R. RAMAN & P.S. GOPINATHAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) NO. 17993/2008 & I.A. 2111 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2009. J U D G M E N T Raman, J. Petitioner is the claim petitioner in E.P. 28/2003 in O.P. 76/94 on the file of the Family Court, Thiruvalla. An extent of 30 cents of property over which, according to the petitioner, she has got one half right, was brought to sale in the execution proceeding and challenging the said proceeding of the court below, this writ petition is filed. 2. During the pendency of the writ petition, the parties have amicably settled their dispute and filed a joint compromise petition - I.A. 2111/2009. It is submitted that the claim of the first respondent has been satisfied and she has no other claim. The attachment of the property in the execution petition will stand lifted. Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment before the Family Court for appropriate directions to be issued to the Sub Registrar Office intimating the fact of lifting the attachment. Attach the Compromise Petition along with this judgment. The writ petition is closed. P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE. P.S. GOPINATHAN, JUDGE. KNC/-