MC 4022/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr R. Goswami, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. The appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law: I. Whether the Appellant/Insurer which is not statutorily liable for compen sation under the Employees Compensation Act as per Section 147 of the M.V. Act, 1988 for the category of workman to which the claimant/respondent No. 1 belongs, can be made liable for compensation for the said workman merely because the sai d workman was under the direct or indirect employment of the insured/policy hold er ? Call for the records. Issue usual notice. Appellant to take steps for service of notice upon the respondents by re gistered post with A/D within a week.