IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 14820 of 2008. Decided on: 01.07.2010. _____________________________________________________ Tilak Raj. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that though he has been working as Cleaner from April, 1993 till December, 1998 and thereafter, from January, 1999 to October, 2006 as Air Compressor Operator, however, he has been regularised as Cleaner with effect from October, 2006. In view of this, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the respondents to consider his case for regularization to the post of Air Compressor Operator as per ratio of law laid down by this Court in Gauri Dutt 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - and others versus State of H.P. latest HLJ, 2008(HP) 366, within a period of three weeks from today. The same shall be considered by the Principal Secretary (PW) within a period of three weeks thereafter. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. July 01, 2010. (sck).