IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF NOTICE OF NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1389 OF 2004 MOTION NO. 1389 OF 2004 MOTION NO. 1389 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX INCOME TAX INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 507 OF 2004 APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 507 OF 2004 APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 507 OF 2004 Tata Chemicals Limited. ... Appellant. V/s. The Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Range. ... Respondent. P.C.Tripathi for the appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. and V.C.DAGA, JJ. and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 11th June 2007. DATED : 11th June 2007. DATED : 11th June 2007. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the appellant. None for the respondent though served. Zerox copy of the letter indicating srvice on the rspondent- Revenue is taken on record. 2. By this notice of motion, appellant seeks to condone delay of 72 days in filing appeal. 3. Perused notice of motion and affidavit in support thereof. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condoning delay in filing appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Hence notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 4. Appeal be placed for admission along with Income Tax Appeal No.991/2004. *****