IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2011 / 13TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3309 of 2011(K) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- THE TALIPARAMBA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. NO. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY IN CHARGE, TALIPARAMBA P.O, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.C.A.JOSEPH, SRI.K.K.MOIDEEN. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR, COLLECTORATE P.O, KANNUR DISTRICT- 670 001. 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY), TALUK OFFICE, TALIPARAMBA, P.O.TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT 670 141. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, TALIPARAMBA VILLAGE, KANNUR DISTRICT- 670 001. 4. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER,KANNUR, COLLECTORATE P.O, KANNUR DISTRICT -670 001. 5. P.DHARANEEDHARAN, NETHAJI HOUSING COLONY, THRICHAMBARAM, TALIPARAMBA P.O, KANNUR DISTRICT -6701 141. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/02/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. C.K.ABDUL REHIM,J. ------------------------------- WP(C).NO. 3309 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2011 JUDGMENT It is brought to the notice of this court that the recovery steps was initiated for realising amounts covered under Ext.P2 order passed by the 4th respondent who is the controlling authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act. It is stated that an appeal filed against Ext.P2 was already rejected by the Regional Joint Labour Commissioner, who is the appellate authority. It is further mentioned that, challenging the rejection of the appeal the petitioner had already filed WP(C).No.641/2011 before this court, which is stated to have been admitted. 2. Under such circumstances, I am of the view that it is not proper or justified on the part of the petitioner to file yet another writ petition. challenging the liability or the recovery steps. 3. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the petitioner seeking appropriate remedy against the recovery steps in WP(C).No.641/2011. C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE pmn/ WP(C) .36550/2010 2