:^ \, ^ iQ HtGH COURTOrCHWCTTISGARH. BILASPUR S.B.: HON'BLESHRIJUSTICESUNILKUMARSINHA WRITPETmONtS)N0.7244Q007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 2. Anil Sharma, aged S2 years, Sto Late Shri LN. Sharma, Blocfc Education Officer, Rajnand^ion, Tah & Distt; Rajnandgaon. VERSUS Stats of Chhattisgarh, Through-The Secretary, Schopl Educatton Departmerit; D.K.S^ Bhawan, Ra^iur (C^) Dlstrict Education Officer, Rajnandgaon. WRFT PETmON UNDERARTICLE 226 OF TME CONSTmiTION OF T INDIA : • • • ::'' ;1 ' .' .. Appearance: Mr. SomkantVerma, Advocate forthe prtiBoner. Mr. Sumesh Bajaj.Govt. Advocate for Ihe Stede/respondenls laRAl.ORDER (15.07.2010) SUNILKUMARSINHA.J. Heard finalty with the consent ofttie parties. Petitioner- Anil Sharma has challenged the validlty of the ortler dated 20.11.07, by which, he was transferred from Rajnandyion to Dongargaon. Leamed counsel for the petitioner, submHs that the petitjor»rwas transferred from Khairagarh to Chhuikhadan on 06.12.08, ftereafter, he was again transferredftomChhulkhadantDRajnanc^aonon21.09.07. He submits that he jolned at Rajnandgaon on 29.09.07, thereafter agaln the petitioner was trEinsferred from Rajnandgaon to Dongargaon by the impugned order dated 20.11.07, therefore, the petittoner is vtefini of ftequent transfers apd action on the part ofttie Govemment is (nalafide. On the other hand, learned counsel for the responcteife opposes these argumentsand submitsthat the transfer of the peBUoner was based on administrative exigency and ttiere isno questton of malaflde. This Court whiie heanng the matter on admisston on07,12.07 passed ao intemrn drdar and d^cted thatthe status<|uo, m relation to the petitioner, as it obtained on ttie said date, shall be maintained by the partiestill Uie neid dat$ ofhearfng. s? '> VSTOTPETITION (S) N0.7244ff0fl7 Mr. Somkant Verma.teamed counsel forthc pettUen»submits ttiat the petitioner is sUII working at Rajnandgaon. Be that as it may, slnce Uie psUtioner is s811 cortinuing Ert Rajnandgaon as an effect of tnterim order grantedan 07.12.07, l deem It appropriate to altow this p^ition aml quash the order <rf transfer of peUtioner dated 20.11.07. Accordingty, the writ pSBUonis altowed and the impugned order of transfw dated20.11.07 (Anneaaire-P-1),so far it relatas ot the peUtioner, is hereby quashed. There shatt be no order as to cost. f^