IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35409 of 2010 FULO MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 15.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner, namely, Fulo Mahto apprehends his arrest in connection with Hasanpur P.S. Case No. 201 of 2005 registered under Section 47(A) of the Excise Act. Admittedly, after due investigation police found the case as mistake of fact and after that the Chief Judicial Magistrate has taken cognizance against the petitioner. Though there is allegation that illicit liquor was recovered from the house of the petitioner but considering this aspect of the matter, police submitted final form showing as a mistake of fact, I think it proper to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to petitioner. Accordingly, petitioner, namely, Fulo Mahto, in the event of his arrest/surrender within thirty days from the date of communication of this order to the court of A.C.J.M, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with Hasanpur P.S. Case No. 201 of 2005, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of above stated court subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)