HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETITION CS -» No. 3533 PETITIONER 2. 3. 4. Bhau Ram Diwedi, aged about 60 years, son of Late Shri Heeramani Diwedi, Resident of Shambhu Chowk, Chhota Bazar, Chirimiri, District Korea, (C.G.) •^TERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bfaawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Distfict Educatioii Officer, Korea, District Korea, C.G. Adiiiiru^rator tiirougli Principal, Laliiri Multipurpose, Higher Seeondary School, Cliiriniiri, District Korea, (C.G.) The Director, Directorate, Public Institution, Pension Bada, Raipur C.G. WRTT PETmON TJNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTLTTION OF INDIA. Present: Shri R.KJaiswal, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri SumeshBajaj, Govt. Advocate forfhe State. V— '^ ' (Passed on 26m day of Juae, 2007) 1. The question of law involved in this petition is whefher the teachers working in govemment aided private schools are entitled to the benefit of the reeommendation ofthe Fifih Pay CommissiQn under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Sikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha ^ Anya Karmchariyon Ke Vetno Ka Sandaya) Adhmiyam, 1978 (hencefprth 'the Adhiniyam, 1978') and fhe mles made thereunder read wifh the Madhya Pradesh Revisioa of Pay Rules, 1998 (henceforfh 'the PayRules, 1998'). 7 2. The identical questien oflaw was considered by this Court in batch of matters i.e. Smt. A.Lall Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others (W.P. No. 4108 of 2005) with other connected matters,and the same was disposed ofby judgment aiid order dated 6.2.2007. It was held ttiat fhe petitioners who are working in fiilly Govermaent aided private schools are eatitled to the revised pay scales w.e.f .1.1.1996 as prescribed under the Pay Rules, 1998. This Court had a-anted certain directions farther for fhe purpose of disbursement ofarrears. 3. Admittedly and jointly, it is submitted by the leamed couasel for the parties tfaat this matter is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passedbythisCourtintfaecaseofSmt. A.LallVs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others and other connected matters (Supra). 4. As a result, for fhe reasons stated in the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed in W.P. No. 4108 of 2005 Smt. A.Lall Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others and other conneeted matters (supra), the writ oetitioa is allowed inthe same terms and conditions. Sd/- . Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Amit