IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33957 of 2011 Surendra Prasad Gupta @ Surendra Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. 2. 12.10.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 120B, 418, 420, 468, 471 and 384 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the accused persons including this petitioner demanded Rs. 80,000/- from the informant for providing appointment as Panchayat teacher. It is further alleged that the persons having inferior claim were appointed on the said post. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner did not appear for interview and finding accusation false, final form was submitted but on protest cognizance has been taken in 2010. Moreover, it is submitted that for redressal of grievance of non appointment the petitioner has alternative remedy under the appointment Rules. 2 Considering the fact that accusation was found false against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 116 of 2007 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Chapra, District- Saran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)