IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 11981 of 2008 Decided on: 29.12.2010 Pushpa Beri …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that her case has not been considered for the post of Supervisor in accordance with law. 2. It has come in the reply that the case of the petitioner was duly considered. Written test was conducted on 19.1.2003. Result was declared on 8.5.2005, however, the petitioner has not qualified the written test. 3. Consequently, since the petitioner has not qualified the written test, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 29, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No