IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9243 of 2010 Surendra Mahto @ Muhchirwa, son of Jamun Mahto, resident Of Mohalla- Sikandarpur, P.S. Town, District-Muzaffarpur. ……….Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ……………………….Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 17. 03. 2010. Heard Mr. Neeraj Kumar @ Sanidh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Satyendra Nr. Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it is a case of misuse of privilege of bail granted to the petitioner by this Court. It appears that bail bond of the petitioner was cancelled on 26. 04. 2005 and petitioner was remanding in the case again on 21. 07. 2009. Therefore, there is misuse of privilege of bail of more than four years. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the alleged misuse, the petitioner has remained in jail for about eight months. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Surendra Mahto @ Muhchirwa, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.No. 3, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 20/2002, subject to conditions (a) that one of the bailors must be Government Servant or close family member of the petitioner, who will fine an affidavit in the 2 court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner and (c) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. m.p. (Birendra Prasad Verma,J.)