IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18204 of 2011 Shailendra Kumar @ Shailendra Kumar Singh, Son of Late Ramdeo Singh, Resident of Village-Saidpur, P.O. Ali Nagar, P.S.- Sauyagarha, District-Lakhisarai. . . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Deputy Development Commissioner, District Village Development Agency, Lakhisarai, Distt-Lakhisarai. 2. The Block Development Officer, Pipariya, Distt- Lakhisarai. 3. The Officer-in-charge, Pipariya Police Station, District- Lakhisarai. . . . . . . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 21.12.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make the officer-in-charge, Piparia police station, as respondent no.3. In the instant writ application, the petitioner prays for quashing Memo no. 275 dated 10.6.2011, issued by the Block Development Officer, Pipariya, whereby he has been directed to refund a sum of Rs. 8,03,275/- towards the value of 575 quintals of undistributed rice allotted under SGRY Scheme. The petitioner submits that the notice does not show the quantity of rice that was allotted to him. In paragraph 1 of the writ application, the petitioner has stated that he was allotted 1950 quintals of rice and he has distributed all the rice against issuance of valid permits. Counsel for the State submits that the submission of the petitioner is subject to verification. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 with condition that the petitioner would file a detailed representation before the Block 2 Development Officer, Piparia within a period of six weeks from today, which would be disposed of within a further period of three months. In the meantime, no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)