:s itMfl C ^^^ .-J^' ^•"^' <»' <lf^( G^L- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH, AT BILASPUR tC.G.) W.P. No~.\s) 5-^-^ /2006 PETITIONER . ^..•c<" ^vu.:-^> r/^-"-. ^^•^y ^ \/..?" .-•'".^ s^'-'-" .<^v^v ^'RESPONDENTS PLAINTIFFS /: Vishnu Yadav aged 40 years, Son of Shri Natha Ram resident of ViUage Kopara Sarpanch Grsan Panchayat UDELA Tehsil TakhapuK District- Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 'l. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Kota, Tehsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.). .GP , 2. Collector, Bilaspur, Tehsil Ss District <f^»^(>L ...i^ w^^'" ^ w ^- Bilaspur (C.G.). <3. Director for Panchayat and Social Welfare, Raipiu- (C.G.). r'. 'a ':i • \ ii^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1950, FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE_OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS ETC.. AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS XI-HC-78 t<iH?n $h*ncb a^'sipnwr, ®Tnt<'is,l°ieii«y ..^.c...s-.^.^ ^ W^ 200 & 31I^TIR^' (yil^q^if) sn^TW^FIW WT3n^Tsf<ro ?^nw (ri^cTsn^r »i<<[ci<fl-<iiitiTftteIA<Ri't<i< ^•sri^TsnSRT Shri M.D. Sharma, Shri Anin Sao. Govt. advance copv. . Areuinents heai-d. Order dicteted as foUo Cduiisel for the netitioner. A.dvocate for fhe State/respondents on ws : '11 l4 Ai n ^if^r^^ .^/•iW^/X/V?J The petitioner, who Paachavat Udela. TehsU - has challenaed the vajidita'. bv the prescribed authoritv' m Revenue Case No.l7/A-8 M.P. (C.G.) PaiichavatRai A( Leanied counsel foi issuaace of the show causc filed bv him. and iust after passed tbe uitpugned order evideuce to the petifioner. F first Tsroviso to Section 4C coinolied. Durine fhe course petitioner subniits that ae 28/6/2006. aa aproeal was Iwas an. elected SarDaiich of Graai [Takhatpur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.L .lofthe order dated 28/6/2006 nassed ISub-Divisional Officer fRevenuei. Kotal .P/2005-06 mider Section 40 {1} oftlie llhiaivam, 1993. the petitioner subinits that after notice to the petitioner. a i-eDlv was filLmg fhe reolv. tlie rorescribed authoritv Iwittiout givm.e aiiv oDportunitv' to lead [is subniission is that fhe urovisions of fl) of tlie said Act have not been of araunients. leamed coiuisel for the fainst the aforesaid order passed 011 flled before tlie CoBector aiid th£^aDn°cil XI-HC-78 an^TqiTf^ri^ (P(T3IK?Tsnil<»i sh—ia e- ^' l-s' <-rr*T^fT awreb 3:q'^Pn?PT, ®Tflu'ls,RlclKiy .i/v.t.^.^4 ^ Wf^ 200X, 3<1^!>1 4;l«b(l^3g^8T) waraTHfN'sn^r -2- was disniissed bv. liim on 3 thereafter. a Revisioii was fi]i 6/9/2006 and the same is Consideriiia tlie facti paiticularlv fhe circuinstandi before the sfatuton' authoritl' Writ Petition at fhis staee. concemed autlioritv; i.e. the the revision filed bv the withia a oeriod of thi-ee ' iac| certified copv of tlus order bet Witli fhe aforesaid ob; disoosed ofat this staee. Certjiied copv as cer ?iraf?pfrr mq?if ff te^t (RRZR ^3Tl^*T3TI^T )8/8/2006. He furfher submits tliat ;d before fhe Director (Paachavati on p^ndiug for disposal. and circumstances of fhis case. that tlie niatter is alreadv oenduig '. 1 am not incliued to interfere in this However. I herebv direct fhat the IDirector fPaiichavat'l shatl disoose of oetitioaer. as earlv as oossible. Dneferablv laclnttis frora the date of production of tore it. leni'ations. this Detition staads finaUv rdles. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge P.T.O. -n'