IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 130 of 2006 Contempt Case U/s. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Order of the High Court dated 03.01.2006 in WPMP No. 110 of 2006 in WP No. 100 of 2006 Between: E.V.Narasimha Chary, S/o. E. Vitala Chary, R/o. H.No.46-626, Bhagath Singhnagar, Chintal Quthbullapur Mandal & Municipality, Ranga Reddy Dist. ... PETITIONER AND 1 Mahender Reddy, Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Division, Hyderabad. 2 B. Srinivasa Reddy, Circle Inspector, Jeedimetla P.S. Cyberabad, Hyderabad. 3 Pushpan Kumar, Station House Officer, Jeedimetla P.S; Cyberabad, Hyderabad. 4 Sri Vital Goud, S/o. Not Known, R/o. H.No.68, Chandranagar, Chintal, Quthabullpur Mandal& Municipality, Ranga Reddy Dist. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 100 of 2006 Between: E.V.Narasimha Chary, S/o. E. Vitala Chary, R/o. H.No.46-626, Bhagath Singhnagar, Chintal Quthbullapur Mandal & Municipality, Ranga Reddy Dist. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner Of Police, Cyberabad Division, Hyderabad. 2 The Circle Inspector, Jeedimetla P.S. Cyberabad, Hyderabad. 3 The Station House Officer, Jeedimetla P.S; Cyberabad, Hyderabad. 4 Sri Vital Goud, S/o. Not Known, R/o. H.No.68, Chandranagar, Chintal, Quthabullpur Mandal& Municipality, Ranga Reddy Dist. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order direction or a writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.1 to as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14,21 and 300(A) of Constitution of India and also contrary to the order or Hon'ble Civil court and harassing the petitioners without implement the orders of civil Court in I.A.No.971/2005 in I.A.No.1453/2004 in O.S.No.453/2004 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy Dist and consequently direct the respondents to not to permit the respondent No.4 from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the schedule property in S.No.158 of an extent of 86.11 sq. yards situated in Chandranagar, Chital, H.M.T Road, Cyberabad by extending police protection to the petitioner and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: CC.No.130 of 2006: This contempt case has been filed to punish the respondents for disobeying the order of this Court dated 03.01.2006 passed in WPMP.No.110 of 2006 in WP.No.100 of 2006. 2. The additional counter has been filed on 30.07.2007 on behalf of the respondents stating that the order of this Court 03.07.3007 making interim stay absolute has been received on 13.07.2007 and that they immediately informed the petitioner that they are ready to provide necessary police protection as and when necessary. It is stated that police protection was provided on 19.07.2007 and on the same day the petitioner constructed the compound wall around the disputed site and also erected the gate and signboard stating that the site belongs to the petitioner. As such, the interim order of this Court has been complied. In view of the aforesaid counter, I do not see any willful disobedience of the interim order of this Court and the contempt case is accordingly dismissed. WP.No.100 of 2006: As the order of this Court has already been implemented, I am of the opinion that no orders are required to be passed in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J February 22, 2008 DSK