IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 1ST PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 5996 of 2008(L) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- T.NISAR, PEON (UNDER SUSPENSION), LAND TRIBUNAL KUTHUPARAMBA, P.O.KUTHUPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.PAREETH RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, KANNUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BEJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 5996 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 20th February, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner, a Peon working in the Land Tribunal was placed under suspension by Exhibit P1 order dated 24.2.2007. Exhibit P1 shows that suspension was in the wake of the fact that petitioner was arrested by the Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau, Kannur on allegations of accepting bribe for issuing a copy of Pattayam. Petitioner has sought for revocation of suspension under Exhibit P2 which is addressed to the District Collector. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that review in cases where there is a vigilance case registered will have to be done by the 1st respondent. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to forward Exhibit P2 to the 1st respondent, if not already forwarded, within a period of four weeks from today. Thereupon, the 1st respondent shall take a decision thereon, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of Exhibit P2, in accordance with law. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) ma K.THANKAPPAN,J CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999 ORDER 25th May, 2007