THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5887 of 2011 ORDER: In this writ petition, petitioner seeks a mandamus declaring the action of the third respondent – Station House Officer, Mogalthur Police Station, Mogalthur, West Godavari District, in interfering with the civil disputes and insisting on him to transfer his property in the name of respondents 4 to 6, as illegal. Fourth respondent is the wife of the petitioner. Respondents 5 and 6 are their sons. At the first instance, the petitioner lodged a complaint against respondents 4 to 6 stating that he was beaten by them and chilli powder was poured in his eyes. Based on the said complaint, a case in Crime No.19 of 2011 was registered against the unofficial respondents under Sections 324, 342 IPC read with 34 IPC on the file of Mogalthur Police Station and investigation is in progress. There was also a complaint lodged by the fourth respondent against the petitioner stating that she was subjected to physical and mental torture to bring additional dowry. Based on the complaint of the fourth respondent, a case in Crime No.43 of 2011 was registered for the offence under Section 498-A IPC and the investigation is taken up. It is stated that in both the matters, investigation is pending. It is the case of the petitioner that there is interference by the third respondent by insisting him to transfer his property in the name of respondents 4 to 6. Based on written instructions, dated 11.03.2011, sent by the third respondent, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 to 3 that except making investigation into Crime Nos.19 and 43 of 2011 pending on the file of Mogalthur Police Station, the third respondent has never interfered with the civil disputes and never insisted the petitioner to transfer his property. The allegations made against respondents 1 to 3 are denied and it is a matter for investigation by them. Such investigation being made by them on the complaints of the petitioner as well as the fourth respondent cannot be termed as interference with the civil disputes. As it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 to 3 that except investigation into the aforesaid crimes, there is no interference with the civil disputes and no insistence on the petitioner to transfer the property in the name of respondents 4 to 6, I dispose of the writ petition placing on record such statement. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 16th MARCH, 2011. kvni