IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46833 of 2008 PUCHHU SINGH @ RAHUL KUMAR @ PUCHCHU SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 08.12.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused for the offences registered under Sections 307, 379, 341, 323, 324/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that allegation of attempt to murder is not made out as there was no intention to kill the informant. In the injury sustained by the informant is found to be simple in nature caused by Danta/Lathi. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused namely Arun Kumar and Bhulu Singh @ Om Kumar Singh have been allowed anticipatory bail vide order dated 21.10.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No.36667/08. The certified copy of the aforesaid order is produced, which is kept on record. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing on behalf of the State on the other hand opposes the prayer for bail, however he is not in position to refute the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioners. Having considered the submissions, as noticed above, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, namely, Pachhu Singh @ Rahul Kumar @ Puchchu Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M, Aurangabad in connection with Obra P.S.Case No.52/08 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. V.K.Pandey Shailesh Kumar Sinha