IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23098 of 2008 RAJIV KUMAR @ RAHUL KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 19/09/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. The petitioner has realized money from the informant on the pretext of providing job but neither money was refunded nor job was provided. Submission is that the informant has exaggerated the case as only Rs. 30,000/- was taken for the job. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the petitioner is directed to deposit a Bank Draft of Rs. 30,000/- in favour of the informant in the court below and after depositing the bank draft the same shall be given to the informant on his proper undertaking that the amount shall be subject to the decision of the case and thereafter, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Gaya in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 4 of 2008. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)