IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.8555 of 2011 SHEOJI PAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr. Misc. No.11123 of 2011 SHRI KISHUN URAON Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr. Misc. No.11136 of 2011 MOHAN CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr. Misc. No.10951 of 2011 SATYENDRA SINGH@ SHEKHAR @ SHEKHAR JEE Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 13.07.2011 All the above stated petitions arise out of Rohtas P.S. Case no. 127/2010 registered under sections 147,148,149,121A,124A,302 of the IPC, 25(i-b)a,26,27 of the Arms Act and 17 CLA Act and accordingly, all the above stated petitions are being disposed of by this common order. Allegedly, cross-firing was made between the extremists and the informant party and in the aforesaid cross-firing one villager sustained fire arm injury and died then and there. Subsequently, all the petitioners were caught by the informant and his party and recovered fire arms and they were produced before the concerned police station and after that present case was instituted. In course of investigation son of the deceased stated before the Investigating officer that after incident, he came to know that it was the informant party who committed the murder of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that recovery of - 2 - fire arms comes under the provision of section 37 of the Arms Act which is bailable in nature and so far as rest sections are concerned, no specific overt-act has been attributed against these petitioners. Taking into consideration the above stated circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners, Sheoji Pal, Shri Kishun Uraon, Mohan Chaudhary and Satyendra Singh @ Shekhar @ Shekhar Jee, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/-each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in Rohtas P.S. Case no. 127/2010 subject to the condition that the petitioners shall attend the learned trial court on each and every date in person for the period of nine months and if they fail to do so on three consecutive dates without any genuine cause, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)