•^ii^^^ ^ ^3^ C-22 sn^r'^i WSI vf^t "ra '^FfRTq, ^Wl'i. fawi-y^ 3TI^T 'lRTg? _^^_C5.^..A/0.:.......4.^.P ifTtidT shtlich sn^i's^iTWB^i PETITIONER Krishna Patel, Teacher. Baraink v Kant Patel, S/o Shri Manddhata A^ed about 46 years, Upper Division Middle School, Chantipali Block pla, District Raigarh (CG) RESPONDENTS 1. Stateofi Throu^.1 Departm^nt Cl'hhattisgarh, the Secretai^, School Education t, DKS Bhawan, Raipm' (CQ) 2. The Dis Raigarh ( jta-ict EdiicStien OfElcer, t3G) 3. Block Eijlucation OQicer District qaigai-h (CO) Wrlt Petition under Artlcle S.B Hon'ble Shri Dhirendri 07.11. Mr. D.R. Patel, counsel 1 Mr. PK Bhaduii, PL for appeaitm. Leamed counsel the respQndents/State jointly| of law involved. in fhe present in Vashwant Kumar Durg 8s Anr. reported ui 201 disposed of vide order 7.2.2007 passed by this Cout dat^d ^^?^i41';r Hfficit''? f^^ <H^i-[ •^atiigtian^i District Block-Baramkela, 226 of the Constitution of India 1_J ^br the peti.tionei''. fe; State. for the petitioner as weU. as for submit that the facts and question petition are the same as to that of iwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, MPJR-CG 96, which has been 3.4.2006 and tiie order dated f in W.P.(s) No.697 of 2007 (A.N^V. r^ i'^i?"^1^ :C-22 SI^lqiT sni^i ^rqw^ftti "TST •sirqRPT, 'S^tWT®.ftKtiyy 3TI^?T IR^ IIHCTI Shoi<*l"""""""""""~""'""""WI. 200 S> 3?I^I I^iWt'dftCT 2- othersl. Accordingly, the writ ^f order palssed in fhe case of f anid A.N.V. Satyanarayan fsi|i] fact as to whether B.Ed./D.Ed./B.T.L/M.Ed. expenses, as per fhe cu'culai|s l.3.1999 aiid further, increments or not. No order whetllier lietition is allowed in teniis of fhe fashwant Kuiaar Bharadwaj (supra) lipra], subi.ect to verification of fhe the petitioner has acquired kamuiatlon i certifi.cat.e on his own ^dated 13.9.1974, 24.12.1998 and he has been paid two advance to costs. fstoral Ek. ais cbTqf^l^l'T ~^WV^ ^: i^<^ ^«R ^;3ri:giisn^T State of Chhattisj ^ ludge [^t