IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN : PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1094 of 2010. Between:- Jinka Sivaiah S/o.J. Balaiah. ..Petitioner (Accused No.1 in Crime No. 258 of 2009 on the file of I Town P.S., Kadapa, Kadapa District). And 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 2.Bommanaboina Renuka Devi D/o. Ramachandrudu, D.No. 2-726, Sriharirao Street, Nagarajupeta, Kadapa City, Kadapa District. ..Respondents Complainant in-do- Petition under Section 482 of Crl.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated therein, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FIR in Crime No. 258 of 2009 of I Town Police Station, Kadapa, Kadapa District. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Smt P. Rajani Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1. The Court made the following ORDER :- The allegations against the petitioner are of secretly marrying the de facto complainant Bommanaboina Renuka Devi, respondent No.2 herein, leading marital life with her and thereafter refusing to accept her as his wife and marrying another woman. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the record reveals that in June, 2009 parents of the de facto complainant asked the petitioner and his parents about the affairs and alleged secret marriage of the parties, and that the marriage of the petitioner with another women took place in November, 2009 and even father of the de facto complainant also attended that marriage and that the impugned complaint is a false one. In case, there was refusal to marry the de facto complainant by the petitioner in June 2009, there was no possibility of the de facto complainant’s father attending the marriage of the petitioner that took place in November, 2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to produce authentic material to show that father of the de facto complainant attended the marriage of the petitioner that took placed in November, 2009. Hence, post the matter after one week under the caption “for orders”. Till then, the petitioner shall not be arrested.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1.The Station House Officer, I Town P.S., Kadapa, Kadapa District. 2.Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.(OUT) 3.One CC to Smt P. Rajani Reddy, Advocate(OPUC).(By Special Messenger) 4.One Spare copy. TKK HIGH COURT PSR.J DT.10-02-2010. ORDER. CRL.P.NO. 1094 OF 2010. D I R E C T I O N. DRAFTED BY TKK DT.10-02-2010. HIGH COURT PSR.J DT.10-02-2010. ORDER CRL.P.NO. 1094 OF 2010. D I R E C T I O N.