1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2601 OF 2009 Anil Marotirao Vidyagar Versus The State of Maharashtra. *** Mr. Nagargoje, Advocate i/b Mr. S. K. Naikwade, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. V. D. Godbharle, A.P.P. for the Respondent / State. Mr. R. B. Deshpande, advocate for Respondent No.2. *** CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 1st OCTOBER, 2009. 1. Heard. Counsel for the accused/ applicant Anil. The proceedings in terms of Crime No.50 of 2008 dated 22nd February, 2008 for an offence under section 363, 342, 506 read with 34 of IPC is sought to be quashed by exercising powers under section 482 Cr.P.C. 2. The counsel for the complainant victim informs charge sheet is filed. 3. If indeed any grievance is there, that can be resorted to before the competent Court. The 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. allegations at this stage, does not warrant exercise of powers under section 482 Cr.P.C. The learned Judge seized is bound to scrutinise the same and take a decision. 4. In the situation, criminal application dismissed. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:01/10/2009. ans/2601