IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2011 / 20TH SRAVANA 1933 CRP.No. 4 of 2006(B) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 05/12/2005 IN EP.NO. 122/02 IN OS.NO. 954/1984 of PRL.M.C.,ERNAKULAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S)/ JUDGEMENT DEBTORS/ DEFENDANTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. VENKATESWARA BHATT, S/O.VAMANA BHATT, RESIDING IN HOUSE BEARING NO. C.C.35/2878, SOUTH JANATHA ROAD, KARANAKODAM DESOM, POONITHURA VILLAGE. 2. GOPALAKRISHNA BHATT, S/O.VAMANA BHATT, RESIDING IN HOUSE BEARING NO.C.C.35/2578, SOUTH JANATHA ROAD, KARANAKODAM DESOM, POONITHURA VILLAGE. 3. NARASIMHA BHATT, S/O.VAMANA BHATT, RESIDING IN HOUSE BEARING NO.C.C.35/2877, SOUTH JANATHA ROAD, KARANAKODAM DESOM, POONITHURA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.JAYACHANDRAN SRI.RAJU V.MATHEW RESPONDENT/ DECREE HOLDER/ PLAINTIFF ------------------------------------------------------------------ KOCHI THIRUMALA DEVASWOM, CHERLAL, KOCHI-2, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. BY ADV. SRI.S.B.PREMACHANDRA PRABHU THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/08/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- C.R.P. No.4 of 2006 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of August, 2011. ORDER This civil revision is filed by the judgment debtors in E.P.No.122 of 2002 in O.S.No.954 of 1984 of the court of learned Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam. Respondent/decree holder filed execution petition under Order 21 Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure contending that petitioners have made certain constructions in violation of the decree. The executing court entered a finding that petitioners violated the decree and ordered them to be detained in civil prison. That order is under challenge. 2. During the pendency of the civil revision parties have settled the dispute and entered into a compromise (vide I.A.No.1866 of 2011). The terms and conditions of the compromise are referred to in I.A.No.1866 of 2011 . It is also agreed between the parties that in view of the compromise, full satisfaction could be recorded in E.P.No.122 of 2002 and the said proceeding could be closed. 3. Having heard learned counsel on both sides I am inclined to accept the compromise. Resultantly this civil revision is disposed of as follows: i. The order dated 05.12.2005 in E.P.No.122 of 2002 in O.S.No.954 of 1984 of the court of learned Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam is set CRP No.4/2006 2 aside. ii. The compromise entered between the parties is recorded and will form part of this order. Accordingly full satisfaction of the execution petition is recorded and that execution petition will stand closed. I.A.No.15 of 2006 will stand dismissed. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, Judge. cks