rv ^ /0- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Pemjon (S} No. 737 of 2008 Petitionsrs 1. Basant Kumar Sahu, S/o Late Chinta Ram Sahu, Aged about 47 years, R/o Viflage Deori, Thana Rajim, Tehsil Rajim, District Raipur (CG) 2. Kartik Ram Sahu, S/o Shri jnderman Sahu. Aged about48 years. R/o VJIiage Peperchhadi, Post Office Beltukari, Tahst! Rsjim, District Ratpur (CQ) 3. Naresh Kumar Sahu, S/o Late Uderam @ Hari Ram Sahu, aged about 45 years, R/o yijjage Deori, Tahsi! Rajim, District Raipur (CG) 4. KabHas Das Nagarchs, S/o Late Raja Ram, Aged about 52 years, R/o Vii!ag© Bejtulcari, Tehsil Rajim, DIstrict Rajpur [CG) 5. Dukhuram, S/o Late Bhukhau Ram, Aged about 55 years, R/o VIISage Sursa Bandha, Tehsil Rajim, District Raipur (CG) 6. Smt. Dulari Bal, W/o Late Ba!j Ram, D/o Kunjlal, aged about 57 years, R/o ViSSage Bejtukars. TehslS Rajim, Dlstrict Raipur (CG) 7. Smt. Dasmat Bai, W/o Late Laxaman Sahu, D/o Shri Ganesh Sahu. Aged about 53 years, R/o VJIIage Beltukari, Tshss! Rajjm, District Raipur (CG) 8. Smf. Leeia Bai Nishad, W/o Late Gangadeen, D/o Harkhu NIshad. Aged about 48 years. R/o ViJIage Sindhouri, Post Office Baronda, TehsH Rajim, Distrlct Rajpur (CG) Stete of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secrstary', Public Works Department. Mantralaya, D/K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Engineer-in-ChJef, Pubiic Works Departmert, Rajpur (CG) 3. Exscu^ve Engineer, Pub!ic Works Department, Raipur (CG) 4. Sub-DJvissona! Offlcer, Publsc Works Departmsnt, Sub-Djvislon Rajim Raipur (C.G) WR!T PETSTOIN UNDER ARTSCLE 226 OF THE CONSTJTUTION OF INDIA Slngte Bench : Hcn'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnjhotri, J. Shri R. K. Paii, Advocato for the poiitioner. -Sh" A. S. Kachwaha, Deputy Advocate Genera! for the respondents, Respondents Versus 1. ^ Thakur ^ -^ ORALORDER (Passed'on this 4th day of February, 2008) Learned counseS appearing for the petitioners submits that the authoritjes concsrned are considering the cases of only those employees, who have approached this Court for grant of reSief. The order dated 4th January, 2007 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 108 of 2005 (Govjnd Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected mattsrs. Is applicabSe to ali the employees, who are sJmiSariy situated. irrespectjve of the fact v/hether the sjmiiarjy situated employees have approached this Court or not. Thus, the responcients are directed to consider She representations of the employees, who are slmjlarly sltuated, in the Sight of the judgment and order passed in the matter of Govind Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others (supra), after verilylng the facts. Learnsd counseS appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitjoner 'wJiS make a representatjon wsthin a period ofseven days. In vjev»' of the above, this petition stands disposed of. No orcier asto CGStS. —""~ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge