sr S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITIONfSI NO.fM'^-^/2007. WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT QF_LIKE_NATU^E. PETITIONER: ^•i-€^-^ Smt. Geeta Jaiswal, wife of Ganshyam Prasad Jaiswal, aged about 43 years, Asst. Teacher, Nutan Priniary Gkls School Hamaalpara Kharsia, Block Kharsia, District Raigargh, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents ^l. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The A^ /] Secretary School Education " ¥- ^\'^ Qcy' ^ ^-^^ "./' /' \ "^.'^ \ ;3 '',1/ Department Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. District Education Officer, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3. Block Development Education Officer, Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.). HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.fS', No. 1102 of 2(K)7 Petitioner : Smt. Seeta Jaiswa! Ver&is Responaents State of Chhatt-isguri-i and o-thers '©•IJ^LE=*L|—^Ai- TttdhS-^^a ff—AS-st.^ A-MaaSla.^AsaS ?o. HOHDi£fVir. JUSTiOB ^utiSls ^. ^gfHilOTri, Present: Mc. Om P. SsAu, -Adyocate. for 'the petitioner. Mr. Ajay [>wivedi,Pane! iawyer for tiie ropondents/State. /^*"^ l^ S F& Ur< U C 1-i :^'.. (Passed on Thls 26r" t>ay of Ftebruary, 2007) 1. Tlie petitloner was appointed on 23.2.82 as AssistiMit Teacher- on fixed pcry scale of Rs. 150 for two yedrs, thereafter, Rs. 169/- fixed for- -rtiird year. After compietion of three years probation, he was gronted regular puy' scaie of Rs. 169-300/-. 2. Leui-ned counse! appearing for -ti-ie petitioner submits thnt the issue tnvoived in the case is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to reguiar p-uy' seule w.e.f. the date of initia! cypointment or- from the dute of compietion of proba+ion period. ¥- 3. The issue invoived, herein was eonsider-ed by the Madhya Pradesh Stute Administrative Ti-ibunu!, Jabaipur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (iVtudhukunt Yadu and 56 oti-iers Vs. State of M.P. &. others), wherein it was heid ihut the simiiai'iy situuted teachers cu-e entitled to regular pay scaie w.e.f. the dute of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to 1+ie Hon'ble Supr-eme Court in Specia! Leave Petition (Civii) No. 6892/93. Jhs smd petition was dismissed by ti-ie Hon'bie Supreme Couri' upholding •Hie decision of the Tr-ibunal to the effect that the Tecchers/Assistant Teaehers are entitled to regular pcy scaie from date of initia! appointment. 4. Leamed coun»!appearing for- the petitioner further aibmits that tiiis Court, while considering the same issue in Su^iii Tiwcri & others Vs. State Sovt. of Chhaftisgarh &. otiiers (VV.P. (5) hio. 5976 of 2006) by order dated 7-11-2006, has granted reguSar pay scale w.e.f. the date of initiul oppointmen't. . Leamed counsei appearing for the parties jointly submit tiiut this case. \s squar-eiy' covered by the decision of tiiis Court in the case of Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. State Sovt. of ChhatS'isgarh & others (&ipra). 6. In 'view of that, this pe+ition is aiiowed in the same term^. No order as to cost; Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge