IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 14168 of 2011 Date of decision September 8, 2011 Diwakar Kumar ....... Appellant Versus State of Punjab and another ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate and Mr. Rajiv Trikha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Additional Advocate General for the respondents. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Counsel for the State says that the impugned order has been withdrawn. Copy of the order is taken on record. Mr. Sarvan Lal, Assistant from the office of the District Controller, Food Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Hoshiarpur is present in Court and says that even the supplies have been restored. He also states that the department is not proposing to take any further action against the petitioner. The statement is taken as a ground for disposal of the writ petition. 2. The writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 8, 2011 archana