IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3709 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3709 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3709 OF 2006 Shri Pradeep D. Nichani ...Applicant (Orig.Complainant) vs. Rohan Exports & Ors. ...Respondents Ms.Amrapali Kasbe i/b. Mr.V.V. Purwant for the Applicant. Mr.Rajesh More, APP for the State. Mr.Mahesh Londhe i/b. Sanjay Udeshi for Respondent No.2. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : DECEMBER 17, 2008 DATED : DECEMBER 17, 2008 DATED : DECEMBER 17, 2008 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that he has not received any instructions from the complainant. Initially, the application for leave to file appeal was filed by the Constituted Power of Attorney of the complainant. However, during the pendency of the application, the Power of Attorney has expired. Thereafter, the applicant who is the original complainant has not given any instructions to the Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant. He has also not sent vakalatnama duly signed by him to the counsel. - 2 - 2. Under these circumstances, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Liberty, however, is granted to the applicant to revive the application, if necessary instructions are given by the applicant. (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)