BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Second day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) Nos.9562, 9564, 9617 and 9624 of 2011 P.THANGAVELU ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED IN CRL.OP.NO.9562/2011 K.RAJA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED IN CRL.OP.NO.9564/2011 I.PERIYASAMY ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) IN CRL.OP.NO.9617/2011 AND PETITIONER/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) IN CRL.OP.NO.9624/2011 Vs THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DINDIGUL THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SPECIAL CELL FOR LAND GRABBING, DISTRICT CRIME BRNACH, DINDIGUL, (CR.NO.NOT KNOWN) ... 1ST & 2ND RESPONDENTS IN CRL.OP.NOS.9562 & 9564 OF 2011 STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUJILIAMPARAI, DINDIGUL. ... 3RD RESPONDENT IN CRL.OP.NOS.9562, 9564 & 9617 OF 2011 STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL DISTRICT ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT IN CRL.OP.NO.9624 OF 2011 For Petitioner : M/S. S.S.MANOHARAN Advocate in Crl.OP.No.9562/2011 For Petitioner : M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate in Crl.OP.No.9564/2011 For Petitioner : M/S.K.JEGANATHAN Advocate in Crl.OP.No.9617/2011 and Crl.OP.No.9624/2011 For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 120(B),406, 420 506(1) and 506(ii) of IPC the petitioners have approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Heard both sides. 3.Today, the learned counsel for the petitioners represented that the matter was settled. They further submitted that it is a family dispute and that has been settled and the defacto complainant is present before this Court and he also filed an affidavit. In paragraph Nos.7 and 8, it is stated that after preferring the complaint, elders of the family intervene and resolved the dispute and withdrawn the same. 4.The Additional Public prosecutor submitted that the said complaint has been given only to the Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai and in turn it was forwarded to the Superintendent of Police,Dindigul and he further submitted that no FIR has been registered. 5. Recording the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the matter has been settled and no case has been registered, the petitions are disposed off. Sd/- 02/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DINDIGUL 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SPECIAL CELL FOR LAND GRABBING, DISTRICT CRIME BRNACH, DINDIGUL 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUJILIAMPARAI, DINDIGUL. 4 THE INSEPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGU DT. 5 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +2.CC to M/S.K.JEGANATHAN Advocate SR.No.25762 & 25763 ssk/04.08.2011 /8c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.9562, 9564, 9617 and 9624 of 2011 Date :02/08/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/