1 SA.615.2005+1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. SECOND APPEAL NO. 615 OF 2005; SECOND APPEAL NO. 667 OF 2005; (Kishan Eknathrao Mule died through LRs. and others VERSUS Janardhan Balkrishna Thakur died through LRs. and others) Mr. Vivek Bhavthankar, Advocate for the appellants in both the Appeals Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders P.C.:- 1] Heard Mr. Bhavthankar extensively. The plaintiff feels aggrieved by the order of learned IInd Additional District Judge, Ambajogai in Regular Civil Appeal no. 42 of 1996 and Regular Civil Appeal no. 94 of 1996, decided by common judgment on 9.10.2003. The Courts find that though they have perused sale deed exhibit 88 and 102 in favour of the plaintiff, however, the description in the sale deed does not match to the pleadings and even the evidence. The rights staked by the plaintiff are contrary to the recitals in exhibit 88 and 102. The detail observations by 2 SA.615.2005+1 both the Courts, do not project any illegality to interfere. Both the Second Appeals do not demonstrate formulation of any substantial question of law between the parties, consequently dismissed. No costs. Sd/- DT. : 26.04.2010 (K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.) arp