WP(C) 5487/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr.G.C.Phukan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr .S.Samaria, learned Standing Counsel, Gauhati Municipal Corporation. In this writ petition the suspension order dated 24.8.2007 has been put to challenge on the ground that no reason can be inferred as to why the petition er has been placed under suspension. I have perused the suspension order dated 24.8.2007, which would indicate that the same has been passed Pending drawal of departmental proceeding . Under such circumstances, it cannot be said that no reason is discernable as to why the af oresaid suspension order has been passed. As the above is the sole ground under which the suspension order has been challenged, I am of the opinion that the petitioner has failed to make out any substantial ground for interference by this court. Accordingly, the writ pet ition is considered to be without any merit. It is accordingly dismissed. The petitioner would naturally be entitled to his due subsistence a llowance as per law while he is under suspension.