IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1006 of 2009 SHAILENDRA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU.HOME SEC.& ----------- 2 16.8.2010 KHAN Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner, who is the informant of Athmalgola P.S. Case No.85 of 2009 registered under sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Penal Code, alleged that his daughter Sarita Devi has been murdered by her in-laws for dowry. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in teeth of the materials on record, the police has submitted final form in favour of the accused persons. The petitioner has even filed protest cum complaint. It would be open for the petitioner to either pursue his protest cum complaint or he would have liberty to press before the learned Magistrate that there is ample material on record for taking cognizance against the accused persons. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case. With the aforesaid observations, this application stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)