'<.»*?^^.g ya::s'%-^»^ {^i'jsc'Ejesg C^l^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.t [<) C^ W.P>lTo........'....:.../...u./20Q7 PETITIONERS: ^.^ \.v-^'/ ..-'.^,c€\^' A»'' !k'»"- (7\.V-' ^•••' .(^' .^*' yy' ?..•••' z TilakKunwar S/0 Shri. /|-ic<Q.'ii;ii-s. Khageshwar Ki.mwar as Asst. Teacher (Tribal Dept.) Govt. Higher Secondaiy School Tapkara R/o Jabla, Post Tapkara Tehsil Kunkuri Dist. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDBNTS: ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Tribal Welfare Departinent, Mantralaya D.K.S. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Pt. R. S. University Campus, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Asst. Commissioner, Tribal WeUare Department, Jashpur District Jashpur (C.G.) PETITION PNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION Or INDIA ^Mfs^^FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND ^ERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SmTABLEWMTS AKD DIRECTIONS:- -APARN^A''^ 'o' HI6H COURT OF CHHATTESfiARH AT BU-ASPUR W. P. (5) No. 934 of 2007 Petitioner : Tilak Kunwar Versus Respondents Storte of Chhatti^arh A o-thers Smgle B<nch: Honlale Mr. Justice Satfsh K; Agmhstri. Mr. Manoj ChcuhanShcirma, Adwcate for the Petitioner. Ms. Oipali Pcndey, PcBiel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 20th &ay of February, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for -the petitioner submits -rtiat the petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher. The petitioner has obtained B.TJ. Examination certificate in the year 1992, on his own expenas. 2. Leamed counset appearing for -rtie petitioner subinits that the question involved, herein asto whether the teacher. who obtained B.TJ. Examination Certificate on his own oqwnses, is entitled to two advance increments. 3. According to leamed counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Courl- in Ihe case. of yashwant Kumar Bharadwcy Vs. ttunicipal Corporation. Durg and another {2006 CEI) AAPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwunt Kumar Bheradwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, burg and another (Supro), came to the conckision that the teachers,. who had obtained B. Ed. /B.TJ. Examination Certificate on their oum expenses, are covered by the circukir dated 24.12.98 issued by the Stote Sovernment of Madhya Pradesh. Learned counsel for the petitioner furrfier submits that the fdcts and question of law involved in -the present case are squarely covered by deciston of this Court in the case of yash«»antKumar Bhara<fa»(y Vs. Mimicipal Corporation. Durg and anuther (S«fl>ra), to which learned counsel appewmg for the respondents fairty concedes and agrees with the averment made by leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed m terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharudwaj Vs. Mimidpal Corporation. Durg and oiwther (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whelher the )»titionerhas acquired B.TJ. Examination Cert'ificate on his ovmexpenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 A 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advcuice increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Subhash