IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 152 of 2009 (M/S) Anand Kumar. .……… Petitioner Versus Hans Raj Kakkar. ...……… Respondent Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate holding brief of Mr. D. Barthwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anant Kumar Agarwal, Advocate for the respondent. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. On this writ petition coming up for consideration today, Mr. Anant Kumar Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, submits that he has no objection if the impugned order is set aside and the petitioner is permitted to get his evidence recorded. Based upon the aforesaid statement of Mr. Anant Kumar Agarwal, this writ petition is disposed of as settled. The impugned order is set aside. It is directed that on the next date, which I hereby would be fixing in the Trial Court, the petitioner shall produce his entire evidence on his self- responsibility and, on that date, the learned Trial Court shall conclude the recording of the entire evidence of the petitioner. No adjournment shall be granted for this purpose. The parties are directed to appear before the Trial Court on 28th April, 2009. (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 27.03.2009 G