IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28374 of 2010 OM PRAKASH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 06.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Admittedly, the petitioner is not named in the FIR nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that name of this petitioner surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused and subsequently, confessional statement of this petitioner was also recorded. It appears to me that the learned court below rejected the prayer for bail of the petitioner considering his criminal antecedent but learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the petitioner is seeking bail in two cases and in the rest cases he is enjoying the privilege of bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as materials available on records, I direct the petitioner to be released on bail in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case no. 171 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R. Bharti, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patnacity. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))