1 cra420.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.420 OF 2010 Shankar Vishnu Pawar ...Applicant vs. Sharda prakash Shinde ...Respondent Mr.A.V.Chatuphale for the applicant Mr.Vijay Patil for the respondent no.1 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 30,2010 P.C. 1 After arguing the revision application for some time, the learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant is not pressing the revision application on merits but time of two years and more to vacate the suit premsies may be granted. The said request is opposed by the learned counsel for the first respondent by contending that the decree is on the ground of bona fide need. 2 The applicant has made a statement that he is not pressing the revision application on merits and he is willing to file an usual undertaking to vacate. As the revision application is not being pressed on merits, the decree will become final. Even if this revision application was to remain pending for final hearing, the same may not reach for final hearing for few years. The applicant is carrying on business in the suit premises for several days. Hence, time to vacate of two years deserves to be granted. 3 Hence, I pass the following order : 2 cra420.sxw i) Civil revision application is dismissed as not pressed with no order as to costs. ii)Notwithstanding the dismissal of the revision application, decree for possession shall not be executed only as against the applicant till 30th November 2012 subject to condition of the applicant and all adult members of his family filing usual undertakings to vacate. iii)Undertakings shall be filed in this Court within a period of four weeks from today. If undertakings are not filed within four weeks, the decree for possession shall become forthwith executable. Copies of the undertakings be supplied in advance to the Advocate for the respondent. JUDGE