wp1730.10 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1730 OF 2010 Keshavraj Hamalanchi Aydyogik Sahakari Sanstha Majalgaon ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi, advocate for the petitioner Mr. K.G. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 3 Mr. S.S. Chapalgaonkar, advocate for respondent No.4 ..... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 4TH JULY, 2011 PER COURT:- 1 The petitioner claims to be a labour society, and has challenged the order dated 31.1.2010 passed by the Additional Collector, Beed. By this order, the work order issued in favour of the petitioner has been cancelled. Several reasons for cancellation of the work order have been mentioned in the impugned order. The principal reason is non payment of the levy to the Mathadi Board. wp1730.10 -2- 2 Before passing that order, a notice was issued to the petitioner on 2.12.2009. However, the petitioner claims that the said notice was not received by it and therefore, the representative of the petitioner could not be present before the Additional Collector. However, it is also contended that when representative appeared before the Additional Collector, it was agreed between the parties that once the payment is made to the petitioner in respect of the work carried out by it, the levy would be paid by it to the Board. 3 These are contradictory stands taken by the petitioner. In any event, we do not see any reason to interfere in such matter, where the order has been passed on 31.1.2010. Admittedly, there is no stay granted to that order and therefore, the work is being carried out by registered Mathadi workers. The petition is rejected. ( M. T. JOSHI, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) rlj/