IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 4395 of 2011 & connected matters. Decided on: July 4, 2011. 1. CWP No. 4395 of 2011 Vichiter Singh Versus State of H.P. & Ors. 2. CWP No. 4398 of 2011 Guddu Ram Versus State of H.P. & Ors. 3. CWP No. 4400 of 2011 Prem Dass Versus State of H.P. & Ors. 4. CWP No. 4401 of 2011 Sita Ram Versus State of H.P. & Ors. 5. CWP No. 4402 of 2011 Mohinder Versus State of H.P. & Ors. 6. CWP No. 4403 of 2011 Yashwant Singh Versus State of H.P. & Ors. 7. CWP No. 4404 of 2011 Sanjay Kumar Versus State of H.P. & Ors. 8. CWP No. 4405 of 2011 Kewal Dass Versus State of H.P. & Ors. 9. CWP No. 4406 of 2011 Narayan Singh Versus State of H.P. & Ors. 10. CWP No. 4408 of 2011 Guddu Ram Versus State of H.P. & Ors. 11. CWP No. 4410 of 2011 Lekh Ram Versus State of H.P. & Ors. 12. CWP No. 4411 of 2011 Vishnu Ram Versus State of H.P. & Ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioners: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim work charge status on completion of eight years of continuous service as daily waged workers. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 2735 of 2010, Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and others. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. We are informed that the State has filed an appeal against the above mentioned decision. Therefore, it is made clear that the implementation of the judgment referred to above would depend on the outcome of the decision of the Apex Court. The needful action, after verifying the facts will be taken within a period of two months from the date of the judgment of the Apex Court. The petitioners will produce a copy of this judgment along with copy of the Writ Petition(s) before the 3rd respondent/competent authority. 2. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. July 4, 2011. ( Justice Sanjay Karol ), (vs) Judge.