S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4901/2006 Mahesh Kumar Gigal & Anr. Vs. Board of Sec. Edu. Raj. Ajmer. & Anr. DATE OF ORDER :: 7.8.2007 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. A.K. Rajvanshy, for the petitioners. Mr. B.L. Bhati, Addl. Govt. Advocate. .... It is stated by learned counsel for the respondents that a similar kind of petition has already been dismissed by Jaipur Bench of this Court. A photocopy of order passed in SBCWP No.6368/2006 is shown to me wherein the order passed reads as follows: “Petitioner is aggrieved by cancellation of her Secondary School Examination for the year 2005-2006 on the ground of using unfair means. It has been contended on behalf of the respondent- Board that it was a case of mass copying at a particular center where the petitioner has also appeared in the above examination. As per the enquiry made and opinion of experts, the examination has been cancelled for all the candidates of that particular center. Even the action has been taken against the invigilator and other defaulting officers. In view of submissions so made on behalf of the respondents, apart from similar writ petitions already having been dismissed by this Court, even otherwise, this Court does not sit in appeal in such matters which are based on subjective assessment of the experts. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly as having no merits.” In view of the order referred above this petition for writ also stands dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR ),J. Jgoyal S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4278/2006 Ashok Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :: 7.8.2007 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. S.P. Sharma, for the petitioners. Mr. B.L. Bhati, Addl. Govt. Advocate. .... It is stated by learned counsel for the respondents that a similar kind of petition has already been dismissed by Jaipur Bench of this Court. A photocopy of order passed in SBCWP No.6368/2006 is shown to me wherein the order passed reads as follows: “Petitioner is aggrieved by cancellation of her Secondary School Examination for the year 2005-2006 on the ground of using unfair means. It has been contended on behalf of the respondent- Board that it was a case of mass copying at a particular center where the petitioner has also appeared in the above examination. As per the enquiry made and opinion of experts, the examination has been cancelled for all the candidates of that particular center. Even the action has been taken against the invigilator and other defaulting officers. In view of submissions so made on behalf of the respondents, apart from similar writ petitions already having been dismissed by this Court, even otherwise, this Court does not sit in appeal in such matters which are based on subjective assessment of the experts. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly as having no merits.” In view of the order referred above this petition for writ also stands dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR ),J. Jgoyal S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4703/2006 Ms Sangeeta & Ors. Vs. State of Raj & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :: 7.8.2007 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Rakesh Arora, for the petitioners. Mr. B.L. Bhati, Addl. Govt. Advocate. .... It is stated by learned counsel for the respondents that a similar kind of petition has already been dismissed by Jaipur Bench of this Court. A photocopy of order passed in SBCWP No.6368/2006 is shown to me wherein the order passed reads as follows: “Petitioner is aggrieved by cancellation of her Secondary School Examination for the year 2005-2006 on the ground of using unfair means. It has been contended on behalf of the respondent- Board that it was a case of mass copying at a particular center where the petitioner has also appeared in the above examination. As per the enquiry made and opinion of experts, the examination has been cancelled for all the candidates of that particular center. Even the action has been taken against the invigilator and other defaulting officers. In view of submissions so made on behalf of the respondents, apart from similar writ petitions already having been dismissed by this Court, even otherwise, this Court does not sit in appeal in such matters which are based on subjective assessment of the experts. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly as having no merits.” In view of the order referred above this petition for writ also stands dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR ),J. Jgoyal S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 5429/2006 Avinash & Ors. Vs. Board of Sec. Edu. Raj. Ajmer. & Anr. DATE OF ORDER :: 7.8.2007 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Bherulal Choudhary, for the petitioners. Mr. B.L. Bhati, Addl. Govt. Advocate. .... It is stated by learned counsel for the respondents that a similar kind of petition has already been dismissed by Jaipur Bench of this Court. A photocopy of order passed in SBCWP No.6368/2006 is shown to me wherein the order passed reads as follows: “Petitioner is aggrieved by cancellation of her Secondary School Examination for the year 2005-2006 on the ground of using unfair means. It has been contended on behalf of the respondent- Board that it was a case of mass copying at a particular center where the petitioner has also appeared in the above examination. As per the enquiry made and opinion of experts, the examination has been cancelled for all the candidates of that particular center. Even the action has been taken against the invigilator and other defaulting officers. In view of submissions so made on behalf of the respondents, apart from similar writ petitions already having been dismissed by this Court, even otherwise, this Court does not sit in appeal in such matters which are based on subjective assessment of the experts. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly as having no merits.” In view of the order referred above this petition for writ also stands dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR ),J. Jgoyal S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7080/2006 Jalam Singh & Anr. Vs. Board of Sec. Edu. Raj. Ajmer. & Anr. DATE OF ORDER :: 7.8.2007 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Vinay Jain, for the petitioners. Mr. B.L. Bhati, Addl. Govt. Advocate. .... It is stated by learned counsel for the respondents that a similar kind of petition has already been dismissed by Jaipur Bench of this Court. A photocopy of order passed in SBCWP No.6368/2006 is shown to me wherein the order passed reads as follows: “Petitioner is aggrieved by cancellation of her Secondary School Examination for the year 2005-2006 on the ground of using unfair means. It has been contended on behalf of the respondent- Board that it was a case of mass copying at a particular center where the petitioner has also appeared in the above examination. As per the enquiry made and opinion of experts, the examination has been cancelled for all the candidates of that particular center. Even the action has been taken against the invigilator and other defaulting officers. In view of submissions so made on behalf of the respondents, apart from similar writ petitions already having been dismissed by this Court, even otherwise, this Court does not sit in appeal in such matters which are based on subjective assessment of the experts. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly as having no merits.” In view of the order referred above this petition for writ also stands dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR ),J. jgoyal