IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18419 of 2008 Sima Srivastav @ Sima Devi . Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr . ----------- 7. 14.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 23rd of April, 2008 taking cognizance of the offences in question in connection with Dumra Police Station Case No.188 of 2006, G.R. No.1466/06/Trial No.2742/08. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that although police after investigation submitted charge sheet against the petitioner, but during investigation, no witness has supported the prosecution case and as such the order taking cognizance, although it mentions that on perusal of the case diary and charge sheet, is not sustainable in law. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has appeared and filed a counter affidavit stating herein that there were sufficient materials collected during investigation and, as such, the police submitted charge sheet and thereafter cognizance has been taken although the petitioner in the rejoinder has denied the charges and submitted that the witnesses have not supported the prosecution case. Considering the submissions of the parties and their respective pleadings as also the impugned order dated 23rd of April, 2008, the question whether the witnesses have supported the prosecution case or not and the veracity of the witnesses if examined - 2 - on behalf of the prosecution during the trial will be subject to scrutiny and examination by the trial court. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter. The writ application being devoid of any merit, the same is, accordingly, dismissed. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)