IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 3RD MAY 2011 / 13TH VAISAKHA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 209 of 2011(S) --------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- THOMAS P. MATHEW, AGED 57, S/O.P.J. MATHEW, PUTHILIKKUNNEL, POTHIKANDAM, KUZHINJALU.P.O, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 602. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KATTAPPANA DIVISION, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 508. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTAPANA CIRCLE, KATTAPPANA,IDUKKI DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTAPANA POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 508. 5. MARTIN MATHEW, PALLIVATHIKKAL HOUSE, ERATTAYAR.P.O, IDUKKI, PINCODE - 685 514. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI BIJOY CHANDRAN FOR R1-4 ADV. SRI.MATHEW SKARIA FOR R5 SRI.TOMY PAUL MAMPILLY FOR R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T. SANKARAN & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS JJ., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(Crl.) No.209 of 2011 S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 3rd day of May, 2011 JUDGMENT Sankaran J., The petitioner, father of Mr.Praful Thomas, alleged that his son was missing from 14.4.2011. Mr.Praful Thomas is aged 26 years. It is alleged that he was running a College of Management and Engineering. There are certain allegations against the fifth respondent. 2. Today, Mr.Praful Thomas is present before the Court. He stated that he was abducted by some un-identified persons and that he was detained in a house in Tamil Nadu. He further states that after four or five days, he was released from the illegal detention and he was left at Kundara in Kerala. The police took him into custody and he was produced before the learned Magistrate and he was released with a direction to appear before this Court on W.P.(Crl.) No.209 of 2011 :2: 3.5.2011. It is stated by Mr.Praful Thomas that he is now free and that he intends to go to his house. Mr.Praful Thomas do not say that the fifth respondent was responsible for his detention. 3. In view of the fact that Mr.Praful Thomas is free now, no further directions are necessary in this Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is closed. K. T. SANKARAN, (JUDGE) M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, (JUDGE) dl/