1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION NO. 2198 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 188 OF 1996 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mrs. A.S.Rasal, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.D. Rakh, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. ............................ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE: 03/08/2010 PER COURT : 1. This is an application for review of the order passed by this Court dated 12/01/2006. 2. Smt. Rasal, the learned counsel appeared on behalf of review petitioner i.e. original respondent nos. 4 to 7 submits that the order came to be passed by this Court without noticing the various orders passed by various authorities. She submits that had those orders and proceedings been brought to the notice of this Court, the impugned order would not have 2 been passed. The order imposing costs is also not tenable in the facts of the case. 3. The review petitioners were duly served with the notice. In spite of service of notice, they chose to remain absent. What is sought to be pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner, could have been brought to the notice of this Court, had the applicant exercised due diligence. 4. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for review of the petition. The petition is, therefore, rejected. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA ] [ B.R. GAVAI ] JUDGE JUDGE knp/RP 2198.06 in WP 188.96