IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No. 990 OF 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 29/04/2009 in WP NO : 7028 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1. Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and another ... APPELLANTS AND 1. Bathini Mrugasira Trust and two others ... RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants: Government Pleader for Revenue Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri T. Amarnath Goud The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) Order dated 29-04-2009 passed in Writ Petition No. 7028 of 2008 has been challenged by the appellants who were respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in the aforestated writ petition. 2. The appellants, who are government authorities had issued notice to respondent No. 1 - Trust pointing out certain illegalities committed by it. The learned singe Judge found certain mistakes in the show cause notice and came to the conclusion that the proceedings had not been initiated with due care and caution. In the circumstances, the writ petition has been allowed and the government authorities have also been saddled with costs. 3. Upon hearing the learned Government Pleader and upon perusal of the impugned order, we do not find anything, which would warrant our interference in the case. 4. It is however clarified that it would be open to the appellants to initiate fresh proceedings against respondent No.1 – Trust, if it has not fulfilled any of the conditions on which the land in question was granted to it. 5. The appeal stands disposed of with no order as to costs. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 12th August, 2009 ks