IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42833 of 2010 Ram Vishwas Rai, S/O Nathun Rai, R/O Village-Dumrahi Ghat, Jhijhribag, P.S. Malsalami, Distt.-Patna. …..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Nityanand Kumar, Advocate. For the State : APP. ----------- 03/ 13.07.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is accused of the case registered under Sections 304(B)/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner’s prayer for bail was rejected earlier on different occasions, considering the fact that he is husband of the deceased who was married with the petitioner in the year 2006 and was subsequently killed on account of non- fulfillment of demand of additional dowry. The marriage was solemnized a year back before the occurrence. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention towards the fardbeyan in which this accused along with his parents and others have caused death, have been granted bail. Only the petitioner is in custody. In a case under Section 304B of the 2 Indian Penal Code, the relationship matters. The case of husband cannot be equated with others. Considering the onus duty upon him, the case of the petitioner is distinguishable form others. A report has been called for and from the report it appears that the witnesses are being examined. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the above named petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is again rejected. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial. kksinha/- (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)