1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3285 OF 2009 Mr. Jaideo Ramprasad Sharma & Anr. ... Petitioners. V/s. Saukat Lalani & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. H.R. Sharma for the Petitioner. Ms. P.P. Bhosle, APP for the State. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 02nd FEBRUARY 2010. P.C. :- Heard the learned Advocate for the Petitioner. Perused the orders passed on the first and the second complaint. Both are dismissed by invoking Section 203 of Cr.P.C. Both dismissals were challenged by filing Revision Application which also have been dismissed. I do not see how when the Petitioner – Complainant was unable to produce even prima- facie material to show that he is in possession of the immovable property that he could seek the assistance of the Criminal Court. The Courts below have concurrently held that the dispute between parties is of civil nature. In such circumstances, the orders dismissing the complaint and the Revision Application do not require any interference, the Writ Petition is dismissed. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)