#3 % 25.04.2011 Present: Petitioners No.1-4 in person with Mr.S.C.Kashyap, Advocate. Ms.Santosh Kohli, APP for the State/respondent No.l. Respondent No.2 in person with Mr.Anuj Tomar, Advocate. +Crl.M.C. No.680/2011 1. This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of FIR No.14/2009 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act P.S. Jyoti Nagar registered on the complaint of respondent No.2. 2. Ground for seeking quashing is that petitioners have amicably settled the matter with respondent No.2 and now there is no dispute left between the parties. ^ 3. PetitionersNo.l to 4 are present. They are identifiedby their counsel Mr.S.C.Kashyap. Respondent No.2 is present. She is identified by her counsel Mr.Anuj Tomar. 4. It is submitted on behalf of the parties that FIR is the result of matrimonial discord which has been amicably settled and now there is no dispute left between the parties. It is submitted that the parties have arrived at a settlement in mediation proceedings conducted at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts. Copy of the settlement arrived at in the 4 Signing Date:28.08.2024 16:54:31 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Mediation Centre is annexed to the petition and to vouch the correctness of the copy annexed to the petition, petitioner No.l and respondent No.2 have appended their signatures today in the court on the Settlement Agreement. 5. Respondent No.2 submits that she has arrived at an amicable settlement with the petitioners of her own accord, without any inducement or threat from any corner and now there is no dispute left between the parties. She further submits that pursuant to the settlement, she has obtained consent divorce with petitioner No.l. It was agreed that petitioners shall pay to her a sum of Rs.1,45,000/- in full and final settlement of her claims for stridhan and maintenance, past and future. Against the settled amount, she has already received a sum of? 95,000/- in two instalments and balance ? 50,000/- has been paid to her in court today, in cash by petitioner No.l. She submits that with the receipt of said amount, now there is no dispute left between her and the petitioners, as such she does not wish .to ^ have the petitioners prosecuted on the basis of her FIR and she has no objection if the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. 6. Ms.Santosh Kohli, APP submits that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. State has no objection if the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. 7. Since the parties have arrived at a compromise and obtained the consent divorce, I feel that no useful purpose shall be served in keeping the FIR and the proceedings arising of the same alive. Therefore, FIR k\ No.14/2009 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act registered at P.S. Jyoti Nagar and the proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. 8. Petition stands disposed of. (AJIT BHARIHOKE) JUDGE APRIL 25, 2011 ks