IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. SUMMARY SUIT NO.744 OF 1998 Sushila Dedhia ..Plaintiff. Vs. Aslam Saiyad Mohd. ..Defendant. .... None present for the parties. CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 18th August, 2009. P.C. : On the previous date an adjournment was granted on the request of the Constituted Attorney of the Plaintiff who stated that the advocate was unable to remain present. Three weeks’ time was granted to the Plaintiff to take necessary steps failing which it was observed that the Court would be constrained to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution. It was expressly made clear that no further adjournment would be granted. The Plaintiff and his advocate are absent. No steps have been taken. The suit shall accordingly stand dismissed for want of prosecution. *****