THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKUR AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.A. No.915 OF 2011 DATED:03-12-2011 Between: Mr. Chennamaneni Jagan Mohan Rao … Appellant And Avatar Mehar Baba Charitable Trust, Sircilla and three others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKUR AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 915 OF 2011 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur) 1. The appellant/respondent No.4 is aggrieved by an order dated 27.7.2011 passed by a learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 27729 of 2010. 2. The parties are referred to as arrayed in the writ petition. 3. The writ petitioner ﬁled the writ petition for a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to provide protection so that respondent No.3 could erect electric poles for supplying electricity to them. It was submitted before the learned Single Judge that respondent No.4 is obstructing respondent No.3 from erecting electric poles and supplying electricity to the writ petitioner. 4. In our opinion, the writ petition was entirely misconceived. If respondent No.3 had any grievance it should have approached the appropriate forum for relief. The writ petitioner hardly has any cause of action in this regard. 5. That apart, the learned Single Judge has gone on to say that in case respondent No.4 obstructs respondent No.3 from erecting poles, then respondent No.3 may ﬁle an appropriate complaint before respondents 1 and 2. 6. It is submitted by learned counsel for respondent No.4 (who is the appellant before us) that respondent No.4 is seriously prejudiced because respondent No.3 is being given police protection for interfering in the land of respondent No.4. 7. It appears to us that if there was any cause of action it was in favour of respondent No.3 and not in favour of the writ petitioner. The learned Single Judge, under these circumstances, ought not to have entertained the writ petition at all. The writ petitioner had no grievance in the matter. 8. In view of the above, we set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge and allow the writ appeal. The miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of. MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ SANJAY KUMAR, J 03-12-2011 pnb