-HG—78 ^E^ "'<l'IfldAI, ®Tli*f'IS,iq<fliyy,< vww a>^i<*> ^ 200 s^v w K.-i'w TraTOT^igfflw l?'-'*-1" Dated 311^1 'tpRi' (1^(^«<<^I) ^IRR^lftBSII^f W.P. PETITIONER Rathra4t Koushik, Son of Sunder Lal Kaushik, aged alj Districtl RESPONDENTS 1. State o^ Paacha'l 2. Examinl Profcssi 3. Chief B Block (CG) Writ Petition U/A 22( <*>Hl<'fAi1'1 ^TTR^ff ^* fs^ <f<l^.l< ^sTfinsii^i Sl No.5658/2<X)8 out 35 years, R/o Tflai, P.S, Janjgir, Jaajgir-Chatapa (CG) versus Chhatdsgarh, thorough the Secretaiy, ?at & Rural Developinent Department, U.K.S. l|3havan,Kaipur(CG) itioa ControUer, Chliattisgarh onal Examination Board, Raipur (CG) xecuti.ve OfBcer, Janpad Pauchat & klalkharoda, District Jaajgir-Champa of the Coastitution of ladia S.B. HON'BLE SHRI DHIRENDkA MISHRA. J. 13.10.3008 Shri JK Shastii, couusel Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Go ir the uetitioner. rt. Advocate for the State. Heard. The petitioner has ffled t(ie instajut petition with the grievance ttiat iu pursuance of thc adverljiseiuent issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Jaapad Paachayat, | Malkharoda, for recruitiiient of Shikshakarmi Grade-III, the pe| before the respondent No.3. Shikshakanai was conducted bi titioaer appUed for the aforeasaid post The examination for selectiou of respondent No.2. The petitioner caiae to fcaow about the result tliroufeh Interuet vide Annexure P-2 that he has been selected as Shiksh^kanai Grade-III, Block-MaIldiaroda. .^.^yHG-78 'yss "4|t)ici<4, yttl'M'ts, fs|'niyy,< *ll*lclTsb*l|ch "^200 Sn^T'q^;- (Tjcrfgq^q) aii^i qn h-A* ^W 37T^?T S»i*licft < f; + TOIIWHfCT 311^1 leanlied avermelnts However, subsequentlv on 28.9.1 selected for Block-Pandanya, Di^ Leamed counsel for fhe ^ never auplied for Shikshakarmi On the ofher hand, subinits that from fhe annexed wifh fhis petition, it ap^ because of wrong readin.g of the the petitioner inakes a represi Officer, Janpad Panchayat-1 raised bv him. in this petition. period of 2 weeks aad en'or, crcp In view of the above sut parties. the instaat oetition is petitioaer to niake a detafled i No.3, raisiag aU fhe grievances i tura, shall decide the sauie withj ofreceipt ofthe represeutation. flrb <?>l<i[ttl41l +li+lflf "^ Isl^l <.f^^R ^sifinsn^n 12008 the petitioner was shown to be Itrict-Kabirdham. |)etitioner submits that the petitioner (prade-III for Paadaria Block. couiisel aDpearina for fhe State in. the petition aad documents ^ears fhat fhe above error has ciept in IOMR fonn. He furUier subniits fhat if iatation before the Chief Executive raisiag aU the gnevances Ifhe saiae shall be decided witTiin a |t in, shaU be corrected. Inussions of leamed counsel for fhe [disposed of wifh a direction to the jepresentatioii before the respondeut jaised by him ia this petition, who, in a period of two weeks froin the date MaUdiaroda. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge c? Da ii