IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 19790 of 2009 Between: U.Yellappa Reddy S/o. Appala Narasaiah, APSRTC, R/o. Flat No.13, RTC Colony Madhuravadi, Visakhapatnam - 41 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P., State Road Transpot Corproation, Rep by its Vice Chairman & Managing Director, Bus Bhavan, APSRTC, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Depot Managar, Visakhapatnam rural, APSRTC, Madhilapalem Visakhapatnam .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION more particularly one in the nature of WRIT of Mandamus declaring the action of the second respondent vide proceedings Rc.No.02/95(13)/09-VSP dated 27-08-2009 as illegal, arbitrary, untenable, violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the Rules and Regulations of Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation and consequently to set aside the same Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.TUHIN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents : MR.K.MADHAVA REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.19790 of 2009 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. Having regard to the fact that the impugned proceedings is only a show-cause notice, under which, the petitioner was called upon to show cause as to why the penalty of removal from service should not be imposed, interference of this Court at this stage is not warranted on any ground whatsoever. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, it is left open to the petitioner to submit his explanation and participate in the enquiry. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J September 16, 2009 MD