Crl. Misc. M-No.34495 of 2009 Satya Narain vs. Darshna Malik & another Present: Mr. Ashwani Bakshi, Advocate. for petitioner. **** This is a petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.PC challenging the award of Rs.1000/- in terms of maintenance allowance to the respondent No.1. The primary contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent No.1 has not been proved to be his legally wedded wife. However, learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to deny that in a civil suit filed by the respondent against the petitioner restraining him from selling his property, the marriage of the parties has been accepted by the Court. In these circumstances, this petition is dismissed. No costs. December 07, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE