1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.3290 OF 1997. NO.3290 OF 1997. NO.3290 OF 1997. M/s.Vanni & Laxmi : Plaintiffs versus M/s.Shree Shares & ors. : Defendants. Sadhana Sonawane i/by Mable & Associates for the Plaintiffs. Jaydeep K Raut i/by Crawford Bayley & Co. for the Defendant No.3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED DATED DATED : OCTOBER 13, 2008. : OCTOBER 13, 2008. : OCTOBER 13, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. None is present for the Plaintiffs to give instructions to the Plaintiffs’ advocate. Mable & Associates who represent the Plaintiffs was 2 absent on the last occasion. As noticed by Justice Nirgude it appears that neither the Plaintiffs nor their advocate are serious in proceeding with the suit. In such circumstances, the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution. Ad-interim relief, if any, to stand vacated. [S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J] [S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J] [S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J]