^^•; ® (• IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) N0. ^3 /2010 (S.B.) APPLICANT : A. K. Majumdar, ^'^—^^ ^A^* ^^/^s/o Late shri D' MaJumdar' a9ed ^.w about 58 years, Resident of Banaras .)^ ^^' '^••' ...^-- Road, Near TCPC, Ambikapur, District - Surguja (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS NON.APPLICANTS CONTEMNORS 1. Shri Yashwant Kumar, Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Korea (C.G.) 2. Shri Lajrus Minj, Treasury Office, Ambikapur, District • Surguja (C.G.) APPLICATION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT.1971 FOR INITIATING CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS. Tjie applicant most humblv and respectfully submits as under: - 1 ' 3?T^T^T RV1{5b 3Ti^T ^^ici> ^rit^ ^ ~^£[^|<4ld^l, ^Til^'''^. fa<ni^ll< ^^±..L^....<£.^^ ^ ^ 'WR^T^W^ •1^[sr' W^T^^IT^^Tf^T SB : Hontble Sliri Manindra Baohan Shrivastswa. J. 15.2.2011 Shri AkhUesh Mishra, Shri Raghavendra Sing|i Shri Y.S. Thakur, counsel co|unsel for the petltioner. i, Advocate appears on behalf of No.l. for ^espondent tie daNd Leamed coiinsel for contempt petition has beenj disobedience of the order this Court in W.P. (S) No.^ petition was filed, the be paid to fhe petitioner in co^npUance has been psdd and under appropriate orders may be pasjsed. 5t726 necess^ry Leamed counsel for fhe| averments made in the repl^ verification, in compliance of amoimt of Rs.29,622/- has January, 2011. He has also which fhe amount could not required verification of fact^ consumed, for which he tende^s chl^id4l"l 'WT^f ^ 'feT^ <r5l<^l< i73ri;<TR3TT^T petitioner submits that this fUed by ftie petitioner alleging 24th September, 2009 passed by of 2007. However, after the amount, which was Fequired to of fhe order of fhe Court, circumstaaaces, he prays fhat respondent No.l, referring to fhe |, has stated fhat after necessary ^he order passed by fhis Cotart, an 1?een paid to the petitioner on 5th ^xplained fhe circumstanees under ^e paid, by stating that the matter and, therefore, some time was unconditional apology. l-:nrA •^fT^f^ "I IXI-HC-22 / 371^'f'^T f^ri^^TB^i '^'RW^rftd 'o ^ Praveea l^ ^£[^iNldq, ^Tll^^^. fa^l^y ^ 3'ni^r T?5r^ WR^?T ^bNlcb "Wl^ 200 '^FE^T' ^STT^T ^RTTW ^ritn <~^ Considenng the submiss respondent and fhat the amount, rule is required to be ^ons made and fhe affidavit filed by p^titioner has already been paid jdischarged. Consequently, the rule finally disposed off. <^l^(<rt4lrl 'RTH^ff ^ fec?t <f^l^l< ^ ^tf^FT 3TT^T ^s discharged and the petition is Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge i-ft^ tf7cF4