^--- <^ F.\oo( \oS" ...<V^ nft-w^y^ /^^%^/" /y^^ ^••>^" ^•v>auy ^^ >'^' <L^ RESPONDENTS VERSUS 2. ^(,att< IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No.3 ~7 8^/2006 PETITIONER ^^ Amitabh Jha, S/o. S.N.Jha Agea a&out 28 years Deputy General Manager D.S.C. VICON Pvt. Ltd., KM 291 + 800, G.E. Road, Vuiage - Janjgiri, BMY Charoda, District- Durg (C.O.). U.O.I. Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways, New Delhi. The State of C.G. through Secretary, Department Of P.W.D. (N.H & Bridge Zone), D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Chief Engineer, P.W.D. (N.H. & Bridge Zonej Nalhai- Chowk, Bairon Bazar, Raipur (C.G-). The Superiatendent of PoUce, Durg, District-Durg (C.G.) The CoUector, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) The Police Superintendent, Kumhari, through its S.H.O. Kumhari, Distric-Durg (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE ^> •\\p 6 t Wi 5. Respondents Versus Amitabh Jha Union of India S Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present_:- Shri Vivek Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Anand Verma, Adyocate for the Union of India. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyerforthe State. 3. 4. (Passed on 09th day of December, 2010) In ihe instant case, a directlon was issued to the respondent No.4 & 6 to extend required protection to the petitioner's company to carry out its legitlmate business under the contract in accordance with law, till further orders, on 25.07.2006. There is no other grievance except interim protection from the police officers. if the grievance of the petitioner still survives after the above stated order, the pet'rtioner may very well approach to the poiice authorities for redressal of his grievance. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that at this stage, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingiy, the writ petition is dlsmissed, as having become infructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok