IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20512 of 2010 1. MUKESH MISHRA 2. Sonu Mishra Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The defence of the petitioners is that the police submitted final form differing with which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 448, 380 and 506 of the Penal Code. Earlier the grand daughter of the complainant had eloped with petitioner no. 1 and in which prosecution petitioner no. 1 is stated to have been enlarged on bail also. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sitamarhi in connection with Complaint Case No. C-1/1486/09. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)