FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2875 OF 2011 “Shri Durgamata Bahuuddeshiya Krida and Shiksnan Sanstha's Shri Durgamata Balakashram Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr.N.D. Sonawane, Advocate holding for Mr. V.D. Hon, Advocate for the petitioner Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondents. CORAM :- D.B. BHOSALE & S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE :- 17TH JUNE, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is seeking the following reliefs : "B] Issue a writ of certiorari or writ in the nature of certiorari to quash and set aside the communication dated 7.3.2011 issued by respondent No.2 Commissioner for Women and Child Develolpment Department, Maharashtra State, Pune and thereby returning back the proposal of the petitioner Sanstha for starting Balakashram at Dharmapuri, Taluka and District Parbhani.” C] Issue a writ of Mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus to the respondents to accept the petitioner's proposal for starting Balkashram at Dharmapuri, Tq. And District Parbhani and to consider the same in accordance with law by giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as directed FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2875 OF 2011 “Shri Durgamata Bahuuddeshiya Krida and Shiksnan Sanstha's Shri Durgamata Balakashram Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 by this Honourable Court in W.P. Nos. 5659 of 2009 and other connected matters vide order dated 14.12.2009." 2] It appears that the petitioner's proposal for starting a Balak Ashram has been returned vide communication dated 7/3/2011 issued by respondent No.3 without mentioning any reason. In view thereof, learned AGP submits that respondent No. 3 will forward the petitioner's proposal for starting Balak Ashram to the Commissioner, Women and Child Development, Commissionerate, Maharashtra State, Pune, for consideration on merits in accordance with law, afresh. 3] In view of her statement, we are disposing of this petition, by the following order :- "Respondent No.3 shall forward the petitioner's proposal for starting Balak Ashram at Dharmapuri, Taluka and District Parbhani, to the Commissioner of Women and Child Development, Commissionerate, Maharashtra State, Pune, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of this order. If respondent No. 3 finds that any compliance is required to be made by the petitioner, the petitioner shall cooperative for complying with the same within the stipulated time. The Commissioner shall consider FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2875 OF 2011 “Shri Durgamata Bahuuddeshiya Krida and Shiksnan Sanstha's Shri Durgamata Balakashram Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 3 the petitioner's proposal on merits, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within 16 weeks from the date of receipt of the proposal.” With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. [S.B. DESHMUKH,J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] grt/-