IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND AUGUST 2007 / 31ST SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 25244 of 2007(E) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------ 1. DR.VIJAYARAGHAVAN, 'SAGARIGA' THOTTATHIL LANE, P.O.KIZHAKKEKOTTA, THRISSUR. 2. MRS. K.N.RAJAMMA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, W/O DR. VIJAYARAGHAVAN, THOTTATHIL LANE, P.O.KIZHAKKEKOTTA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ANIL RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. SUDHAHARAN SANKARAN, S/O LATE SANKARAN, 'MANOVASAM', KAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, KANIPAYYUR, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. LAKSHMI SANKARAN, W/O LATE SANKARAN, 'MANOVASAM' KAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, KANIPAYYUR, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. DR. KAJA HARAN, R.V.HOSPITAL, VETTOM P.O., TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. S.NIMALA HARAN, "RADHA", XV/156, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 5. S.DIVAHARAN, S/O LATE SANKARAN, MANOVASAM KAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, KANIPPAYYUR, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 6. S.I. OF POLICE, TOWN EAST POLICE STATION THRISSUR. 7. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR. 8. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM. - R6 TO R8 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 25244 OF 2007-E ----------------------------------------- Dated 22nd August, 2007. JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioners have approached this Court, seeking a direction to respondents 6 and 7, the S.I of Police and Superintendent of Police respectively, to take action on Ext.P1 representation. The petitioners earlier filed W.P.(C) No.23654/2007, seeking police protection. The prayer in this writ petition was one of the prayers in that writ petition. It was considered by the Division Bench, but no relief was granted. So, the present writ petition for the very same relief is an abuse of the process of the court. The petitioners have chosen not to mention about the earlier writ petition in this writ petition. That means a material fact which may affect the fate of the case has been suppressed. For this reason also the writ petition cannot be Wpc 25244/07 2 entertained. In the result, it is dismissed. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE. Nm/