IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2801of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision:18.05.2009 M/s Longia Sweets ...Petitioner versus Paramjit Singh and another ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr.Arvind Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ----- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. The revision is against the fixation of a provisional rent pending proceedings directing the tenant to pay @ Rs.2,800/-. The Rent Controller adopted the procedure in the face of rival contentions by the landlord and the tenant who were respectively contending that the rent was Rs.3,150/- per month and Rs.1,500/- per month. The Rent Controller relied on copy of a petition where the rate of rent regarding the adjoining property was assessed at Rs.2,750/- per month and directed that the provisional rent shall be Rs.2,800/- per month with cost assessed @ Rs.300/-. 2. Having regard to the fact that merely the provisional rent was being assessed and any excess payment could be adjusted against any future rents payable, no serious prejudice could be said to be Civil Revision No.2801of 2009 (O&M) - 2 - caused to the tenant. The rights of parties have not been fully adjudicated and therefore, there is no reason to interfere with the order of the Rent Controller. The Civil Revision is dismissed. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 18.05.2009 sanjeev