1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.S. NO. 690/2010 IN Second Appeal No. 214/2010 (Sharad Rametke (dead) thr. LR's Smt. Asha Sharadrao Ramteke & others VERSUS Sushiladevi Mohanprasad Tripathi) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.D. Khamborkar, counsel for the appellant. Shri S.P. Joshi h/f Shri P.Y. Deshpande, counsel for the respondent. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 1 , 2010 . Heard. The learned counsel for the non-applicants states that the possession of the applicant would not be disturbed except by following the due process of law. The learned counsel for the non-applicants further states that the non- applicants would not create any third party interest in the suit property during the pendency of the second appeal but, the applicant should also be restrained from creating any third party interest in the suit property during the pendency of the second appeal as the applicant is in possession of the suit proeprty. Hence, the non-applicants are restrained from disturbing the possession of the respondent-applicant over the 2 suit property during the pendency of the appeal except by following the due process of law. Both the parties are restrained from creating any third party interest in the suit property till the decision of the second appeal. The civil application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. JUDGE APTE