IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6811 of 2010 RAM NARESH MAHTO, SON OF LATE AWADH BIHARI SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PARSURAMPUR, P.S. PARSAUNI, DISTRICT SITAMARHI. --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAM CHANDRA SINGH, SON OF LATE ISHWAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 19, BHAVEDPUR NAGAR PARISHAD, SITAMARHI, P.S. AND DISTRICT SITAMARHI. --- OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 2 26.4.2010 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 7.1.2010 taking cognizance under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code should be quashed on the ground that there are several discrepancies. One of them be that the cheque issued is different to the one which has been annexed with the complaint petition as there is difference in the year on which the cheque was issued. These aspects of the matter cannot be considered at the time of taking cognizance. This application is dismissed. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)