RSA No.394 of 1987 (O&M) Amarjit Kaur v. Randhir Singh and others Present: None. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the defendant against decree of the courts below declaring plaintiff to be owner in possession and restraining the appellant from interfering therein or alienating the suit property. 2. Case of the plaintiffs was for declaration of title and injunction based on Will dated 1.5.1981 executed by Har Kaur, widow of Kesar Singh in their favour. Plaintiffs claimed to be grandsons of Har Kaur. 3. The appellant-defendant contested the suit questioning the existence of the Will which became the main issue between the parties. The trial court held that the Will was genuine and upheld the case of the respondent- defendants. The lower appellate court affirmed the said finding. 4. The appeal has been pending for the last more than 22 years. The appeal can be entertained RSA No.394 of 1987 (O&M) only if there is any substantial question of law. No substantial question of law has been framed. 5. Inspite of repeated calls, none appears. The matter was shown in the list earlier also. 6. In these circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. 7. A copy of this order be sent to the appellant. November 3, 2009 (Adarsh Kumar Goel) ‘gs’ Judge 2