hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 34 OF 1995 M/s. Bhavin International ... Petitioner Versus Union of India and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Brijesh Pathak i/bny Kantawala & Co. for Petitioner. Mrs. N.V. Masurkar with Mr. R.B. Pardeshi for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 20, 2009 P.C. This court had granted interim relief on 19.1.1995 in terms of Prayer Clause (c)(i) which was to restrain respondents from executing, pursuing, continuing or enforcing the show cause notice Exh. “Q” to the Petition. When the matter is called out counsel for the Petitioner states that their records is taken away and they have no instructions. Petition dismissed for non prosecution. Interim relief dated 19.1.1995 as continued by order dated 13.2.1995 stands vacated. Respondents to take steps in law to which they are entitled to. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. We make it clear that pendnecy of this petition will not prevent the respondents from pursuing the matter or permit the Petitioners to contend that action cannot be taken after considerable lapse of time. (D.G. KARNIK,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)