G^W- IN THE HIGH COURT OF IUDICATURE AT BILASPUR: C.G. M.C.C. no. ^f cj /2010 Applicant: ^l Shri Jawaharlal Nagdeva, s/o ^.'^'^'"tt.fc^ G.D.Sanchandani f wrongly wri ^V^F.^^ written correct .^ ^"""L'.."%^ ^tA'7^^W' surname is Chandani) r/o Katora ^,^-3 C^sa^< Talab,Raipur,and RDA Building, Sharda ^sA-"'" Chowk, Raipur,C.G. Versus Non applicant: Smt. Satti Bai,wd/o late Sabhagchand [s/o Bidamal), r/o Lakhe nagar, Raipur, C.G. Application u/Sec. 151 Code ofCivil Procedure for stay of execution and grant oftime to bring stav order from the hon' Suoreme Court. <WH^IT W*li<ft '3^T ^II^KTj^, ©Tll'M^Kc,f®!^!-(H^< ^..l?..^.......g5.(l0., -^200 ^n^?r J^3K (^rf^R^) 3TT^T ^T ^i4» ^CT W^T s^^iGft ^nw^^y^n^r 1 S.B. HorTble Shri Justlce N.K. Aaari 1WTf<?Pft;;T 'RW^f "^ 'fe1^ <r^^s< ^TStRWW^T wal 05.03.2010 Shri Bhishma Kinger, Advoc^te for applicant. Heard on admission. The instant petition has be^n preferred under Section 151 of CPC for grant of stay order a^ainst the execution of eviction order passed by the Rent Controll|ng Authority, Raipur, (for short 'RCA') and affirmed by this court i(i CivilRevision No. 62/06 vide itsorderdated 16.02.2010. Shri Mnger, learned counsjel appearing for the applicant would submit that the petitjoner ha| already proceeded to file SLP alongwithan application for stayin^ the execution of eviction order passed by the RCA, Raipur, and| afflrmed by this court in Civil Revisjon No. 62/06. However, it (^iay take 4 to 6 weeks time and therefore, the execution of the ^victton order be stayed for a ^nable him to produce the stay l|)reme Court. period of 4 to 6 weeks so as to order after obtaining it from the Su fbr Having heard the counsel a^ considered opinion of this court, petition; the applicant is free to executing court to grant him specjfied time so that he may bring and produce the stay order fro(n the Supreme Court. If the ^pearing for the appllcant, in the the relief claimed under this r|iove an application before the ^il^cft^ 2?NhT IF^TT^^, .^RT<F{k —FS/147—2/2010 —1,00,000. ^nwwwNi^ T^T r^i^i<n^, ^Til^4!^ f®«ni^li< —....:.!^......^Zi.0. 0 ^200 ^TI^T^^ (<lc<(^<ilsT) ^n^T^T'f^w WT^TY^lsFRN? Sahu ^nw^ft^y^n^y -u applicant files such applics^tion then it is expected that the exec^' the same on its own merits in acc<{) With this observation, the |j order asto costs. Certified copy as per rules. obl^fd^l^ WRf^f ^f <ftT3t <Pn^8< ^T3tRW3T!^T before the executing court. ting court shall certainly decide >rdance with law. etition stands dlsposed of. No Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge ^nw^r seNhr ^m^r, .^T-rhFtt^ —FS/147—2/201 o—i ,00,000.