IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1864 of 2010 SONELAL MAHTON, son of Late Prayag Mahton, resident of Vilage Sushil Nagar, Police Station-Sanghual, District Begusarai. ---Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. ANSHULI ARYA, daughter of name not known, the Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna-4. ---Opposite Parties ----------- 3. 29.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite party. A show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party no.2. However, the same has wrongly been mentioned as opposite party no.1. In the said show cause it is stated that the order of this Court has been complied with and appropriate order as per Memo no.3661 dated 29th of May, 2010, as contained in Annexure A to the show cause, has been passed. The petitioner has filed a reply thereto. Learned counsel appearing for opposite party submits that in view of the aforesaid order (Annexure A), this contempt application need not proceed further since the order of this Court has been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the contributory provident fund for the period 1974-81 to the tune of Rs.2,040/- is inadequate. However, the same has not been paid although sanctioned. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is still aggrieved by the said order, contained in Annexure A, refusing to grant pension and leave encashment and sanction of - 2 - inadequate amount of contributory provident fund and as such, the petitioner proposes to assail the said order before an appropriate forum as per law. Considering the submissions of the parties and also in view of the fact that the order of this Court has been complied by passing the order, as contained in Annexure A, the M.J.C. application need not proceed further. The same stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)