JL' o^r 2- -A HK3H GOimT OF GHWWCT-FISQARMJffi B1LASRUR DlVISIONBENeH CORAMi HON'BLE SHRl RAJEEVGUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUM<»SINHA, J, ApBltcants Appellants MCCNo.ie7of2007 1 Srot AniroUn Bal wldow of Late Govind Nish^l, aged 30 years 2 Bhojram, aged 8 years Son of Late Govind Nishad 3 Balchandra, aged <^eare Son of Late GovindNishad 4 Kirtan Kumar, aged 3 years Son of Late GovindNishad 5 Flrantln Bai, aged j60 years W/ife of BodhtNishad i All residents of Village All<h(wrta,1|ahstl Dongargarh, Dtsti-eit Rajnanc^laon, appedlant No.2 to 4 are mlnors, guardian Smt Amrotin Bai Versus 1 Narottam, aged 30 years Son of Golari, Re8identofVillageBargaha;Tahsiland District Rajnandgaon, Driver Truck No.MBY/80(» 2 Smt Manisha Gupta Wlte of Ashok Gupta, Resident of Stariiym, Rajnandgaon 3 National Insurance-f l^unathi Line, Rajnandgaon \ ADDMcrtionforTestorationofMftNo^t8(M1987 Non-aDDltcante Respondents Presenf: ShriAnand ShuJda(Counselftffthep^t(orie%. Qrder ^h1=ebni^,28W) The followlng order of the Court vas R2UeevGupta;C.J. by Shri Anand Shukla, learned counsel for the petitloners is heard on the restoratlon petition. 2) The petitioners are seeklng restoration of M.A.No.180 of 1997 which was dismissed for want of prosecutlon vide order dated 08.03.2007. 3) On due consideration of the submlsslons of leamed counsel for the petitioners and the grounds taken In the restoration petition, we are satlsfied that the absence of the petitlonersVappeltants' counsel on 08.03.2007 when M.A.No. 180/1997 wastakenupfor hearing, was based on bona fide grounds. 4) M.C.C.No.167/2007,therefore,isallowedandM.A.No.180 of 1997 Is restored to its original number. _^ Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge padma