C.R. No.6646 of 2007 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.6646 of 2007 Date of Decision. 04.10.2011 Ramroop son of Shyam Lal, resident of Mohalla Piragha, Narnaul, Tehsil Narnaul, Distt. Mahendargarh .....Petitioner Versus Dwarka Parshad son of Banarsi Dass, resident of Bachhod, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mahendergarh. .....Respondent Present: None. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J. 1. The revision petition is against an interim order passed at the trial of civil suit. The case has been directed to be posted before this Court by the order of Acting Chief Justice for expeditious disposal. Since there is no representation for either side, I hasten to pass the order on the basis of records available. 2. The defendant, who had sought for reopening the case seeking for permission to lead evidence, is the revision petitioner against the order dismissing such permission. The order was passed on 24.09.2007 and it is not clear from the records whether the trial has completed or is still pending. If the case is not disposed of yet, the order passed on 24.09.2007 is set aside on condition that the petitioner pays Rs.5,000/- as costs to the plaintiff or his counsel within one week from the date of receipt of copy of the order. If the amount is not paid as directed, the C.R. No.6646 of 2007 -2- order passed already shall stand confirmed. 3. Registry is directed to issue a copy of the order to petitioner as the order has been passed in the absence of parties. The revision petition is disposed of as above. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE October 04, 2011 Pankaj*