:1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.957 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Geogy Jacob for the Applicants. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP. for the State. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J. DATED : 22/3/2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Grievance made in this application is that the advocate for the applicants was under pressure compelled to make a statement that the applicants who were seeking bail will pay sum of Rs.1/- lac jointly and severally to the L.R.s. of the deceased within two months from the date of release. It is obvious that this is not a condition of bail because payment relates to a period beyond the period of release. The impugned part of the order merely records what the Advocate has stated and so far. Neither the amount has been paid nor :2: any action is taken for claiming the said amount on the basis of the said undertaking. There is no recording in the order that the undertaking has been accepted. In this view of the matter, except by clarifying that the Paragraph 5 of the impugned operative order does not amount to a condition of grant of bail, I do not find any cause to interfere in the impugned order and therefore, the application is disposed off accordingly. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)