IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2623 of 2006 NATHUN PRASAD SINGH Versus SECRETARY,BIHAR STATE VIDYUT BOARD AND OTHERS. ----------- 2. 23.3.2010. Mr. Sunil Kumar alias Sunil Kumar Jha learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dharmeshwar Mishra, learned counsel representing the Board are present. The writ petition was filed for payment of retiral benefits as admissible to the petitioner having retired from the services of the Board on 31.12.2004 while holding the post of Head Linesman. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Board and in paragraph-5 thereof, it is stated that the GPF amount was paid on 9.3.2006, leave encashment amount on 18.7.2006, the group savings scheme amount on 16.8.2005, the gratuity amount on 12.6.2006, traveling allowance amount on 18.9.2006 and the arrears of the revised salary has also been paid with final withdrawal. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the position, there is no statement in regard to the payment of pension. Having regard to the statement made in the counter affidavit, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach 2 the authority concerned for payment of pension which has not yet been paid to him and no sooner such representation is filed, if the said amount had not yet been paid to the petitioner, the same should be paid within a period of three months from the date of production/receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition stands disposed of. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)