IN THE HIGH COURT Of CHHATTISGARH/AT BILASPUR "7^^ W.P.No 2''"136/2005 PETITIONER ..-•^ /\^-^y ^y^ ^^$"-" ^.'••••' A'? -"^'K.^ .^>^y' \- .-»'' ''<^- 'M/s.Kanker Roadways, Through /V Partner-Preetam Singh Garcha, S/o. Late^Shri Jogendar Singh Garcha, Aged about 57 years, R/o. Civil Lines, Raipur ,(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS '-/Y^.-i i^'is.n.' State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Transport, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. 7/. Regional Transport Authority, Chhattisgarh at Raipur. 3^/- Gurj indar Singh, BUS Operator, Jagdalpur (C.G.). 4^.." Anand Mishra, Bus Operator, Jagdalpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. JIE^TA T T..^_.OF ai.uj^. XI-HC-22 3ST "MI^ICll, (STTwKo, isKll^y )4i*iwi a>^4ra> RT'-Rrai ^..u..^.-.^.o^ fc|'b< s 3n^?T?iT R-li»b3]T^T OTRigrgtT 3TI^T6«IIWCTf?(T •=bl<ltd'if)-l *<WcfTffIsL&l <Rl+dl< ^isrf^tiran^T 20-7-2005 Shri B. K. Rawat, coun: Shri Yashwant Singh for the petitioner. [Thakur, ©ovf.Advocate for respondent No.l. Heard both the counsel The instant petition aggrieved by the order date is been filed by the petitioner being 31st March 2005 whereby theRegional Transport Authority rejecte^d the dpplication of the petitioner for grant of re9ular permit froiti Beejapur. Jagckilpur to Bhopalpatnam via Seedam, Para-4 of the impugne^J order shows that the said application VMS rejected on theground t| No.94/04 from Beejapur to 3 whereas, the petitioner's pro| From perusal of time is factual mistake in the departure of objector ©uljin iat fiuljinder Singh who is holding permit a9dalpur, his bus departure time is 6 am osed time is 5.58 am from Beejapur. chedule Anenxure-P/1 shows that there mpugned order because the time of ler Singh's as per the permit is 6.30 am ^tif^L ^.r ./^-tl^-Z.Z. CT^TERT R-ii+siT^r sb^l+yiitd <barve 3^ '<<i'4id<<, aiTnu'ic, isiditty 3T1^?T Klt<rtl sht<J* •^—'••—••"•t-Y- g^ 200^~ fSre^ ouid not 6 am, therefore, yer\ on account of this the impugn^d order is liable to be quashed. In yiew of the above, 1+ie writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is quashed. Tljie matter 'is remitt-ed back to the R.T.A. and the R.T.A. is directed to^ consider the application afresh after giving opportunity to the olj>jector and decide the opplication in accordance with law. In view of this order, I. Part-ies are entitled for «M<ifa<fl-ftiiti("iTffte<^<R]<'di< ^>3l1^T3D^T ^ foundation of this order is wrong and ^. No.6029/2005 stands disposed of. certified copy of this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo ie '. ,J 1]1