B®f IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (Sl No. a-6t^-S'~ OF 2011. PETITIONER Hem Raj Mandavi, S/o. late Shri A.R.Mandavi, aged about 50 yeeu-s, Principal, Govt.Girls Higher Secondary School Rajnandgaon, Distt. RajnandgaonfC. G.) VERSUS T RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) ,y e' 2. Coramissioner, Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Development Department Pt. Ravishankar Shukla Premises Raipur, Distt. Raipur, (C.G.) 3. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, <2-£4 g, Distt. Bwg (C. G.) s/7 ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA T' ail^TWf^w WTSII^IWqW '3~^ "4i<ii<n<<,a>Til'M'i(o, fs«ni'Hli,< —...i<j..es:}...z.ltJi..s.M.. •qP^IT^tTraT-"'-"-1'""'-" ••••'" "••"•'••^200 3?I^[ 'q^q? (1pf3^]i:T) TOIIWllfef 311^1 SB : IHon'ble Shri^[anind ^Iirf<:T<lH ^IPRff ^f "fe^ •<,F^*$K itrsiRnsn^T ra Mohan Shrivastava. J.I 13.5.2011 Shri Somkant Verma,|counsel for the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Pa^iel Lawyer for the State/respondents, on advance copy. Heard on admission. Leamed counsel app^aring for the petitioner subinits that the petitioner is entitled to account of he havii^; pi benefit of two advance increments on ssed B.Ed. examination before his appointment at his own post. It is submitted that the issue involved in fhe present pelfition is no longer res mtegra and the same has been finally decijled by the Hont>le Supreme Court in the case ofAsfca Scccena t>s. Stccte of Sa.P. & Ors., 2009 JSPJR (SCf 59. It is further submittfcd that fhis Court has also taken a similar view in its or^ler dated 06-02-2009 passed in Leamed coiinsel for the petitioner W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. further draws attention of fchis Coiirt to order dated 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal No. ^24 of 2009, wherein relymg upon the of the Court m. tlie case of Asha Saxena (supra) and tfae order passejd by this Court in another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, directions ha\(e been issued for consideration offhe T XI-HC—78 311^1 qiI^fflT WII 311^1 sntiti PrEweea TS[ '^wiv\<i, ^ww, ("Kti'yy.i ^IHCTI ^>*ir<*> WI.200 3n^i'<pR7 (Tpf3^^) ^aiWHtei aii^i advabce case for grant of two 21-09-1974 issued by t^i verification of the facts plea^ Leamed counsel for| the petitioner would also b^ In view of the stat finally disposed off wifh a 4 to consider and decide the advance increments as per| the State of Madhya pleaded in fhe petitton, witj date of receipt of copy of thj|s '*i<ii<'i<ii-< *iwvS ^f^s <r<i]t{]< ^affinsil^r increments as per cireular dated e State of Madhya Pradesh, after led in the petition. the respondents submits fhat case of considered on fhe same lines. eiaent naade above, this petition is .irection to the respondent aufhorities daiin of the petitioner for grant of two cu-cular dated 21-09-1974 issued by after verification of the facts [rin a period of three montfas from tfae order. Pratlesh Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge -S 6/>>/<' i