Rev.Aplc(md)No.89 of 2011 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.03.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Rev.Aplc(md)No.89 of 2011 1. Ku.Kana.Na.Cho.Kana.Subramaniyan Chettiar 2. Kannappan 3. Alamelu 4. Meenatchi 5. Rukmani Achi (died) ... Petitioners/Respondents (cause title accepted vide order dated 12.09.2011 made in M.P.(MD) No.2 of 2011 in Rev.Aplc(MD) SR.No.29429 of 2019) versus 1. A.Kathayee 2. R.Meenal 3. A.Murugan 4. A.Sonai ... Respondents Review Application filed under Section 114 C.P.C. read with Order 47 Rule 1 of C.P.C. against the Judgment dated 30.04.2010 made in S.A.No.600 of 1997. Prayer in S.A.No.600 of 1997: Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C.,against the Judgment and Decree dated 17.01.1997 made in A.S.No.176 of 1996 by the Principal District Court, Sivagangai, reversing the Judgment and Decree Dated 29.11.1995 made in O.S.No.88 of 1989 by the District Munsif Court, Sivagangai. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Natarajan For Respondents : Mr.S.Parthasarathy for R4 ORDER This review application has been filed against the Judgment dated 30.04.2010 passed in S.A.No.600 of 1997. 1/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Rev.Aplc(md)No.89 of 2011 2. Today, when the review application is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he is not having any instruction from the review petitioners. He has also filed a memo that effect. 3. Based on the memo filed by the learned counsel appearing for the review petitioners, the review application is dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ogy To 1.The Principal District Judge, Sivagangai. 2.The District Munsif, Sivagangai. Rev. Aplc(md)No.89 of 2011 18.03.2022 RK(29/03/2022) 2P 3C 2/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/