l^ ^v CS} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, WRIT PETITION (SVNO. 7/^_of 2010 PETITIONER f o/,y ^ / ^w i6^y RESPONDENTS / &r. (Smt.) Smriti Chakravarty, wife of Shri T.K. Chakravarty, aged 51 years, Occupation- Service, presently posted as Professor (Botany) in C.&. &overnment Co\}e.ge. Raipur. resident of T/8, Jeevan Vihar Colony, Telibandha, Raipur (CG) Vs ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. ,2. The Commissioner, Higher Education , Department, Science Cotlege Campus, Raipur (CG) /3. The PrincipQl, Government C.G. College, Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. P'ARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: - / HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AJ' BJLA5PUR WR1T PETmON (S') No. 718 of2010 PETITIONER : Dr. (Smt.) Stm-iti Chakravaily. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : StateofChhattisgarh&Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon»bleSlui Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Stoi Rajeev Shiivastava- Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Goveniiiient Advocate for the State/respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 19th day of Febmary, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appeai-ing for the petitioner submits that the placement ofthe petitioner iii the provisional seniority list:, has been lowered down in the ilnal semority iist for which no reasons have been assigned. Accordmgly, the petitioner has made a representation dated 03.12.2009 (Aimexure P/9) to the Coimriissioner, Higlier Education Department, Raipun Raipur. Till date, the said representation has not been decided. SM Bhatia, leamed Deputy Govemnient Advocate appeariiig fbr the State/respondents subniits that the representation of the petitioner, as aforestated, shall be considered and decided in accordance with law and 2. cn merit as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 3. In view ofthe foregoing, according to leamed counsel for the petitioner, nothisig survives for adjudication at this stage. 4. Accordmgly, the writ petition is disposed of \ Ainit Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge \