IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16652 of 2009 1. BRAHMDEO SINGH S/O LATE BIJAL PRASAD SINGH R/O MOH WARD NO. 25, NORTH HAJIPUR LOHIYA NAGAR, P.S. CHITRAGUPTA NAGAR, P.O. KOSHI COLLEGE , KHAGARIA, DISTT- KHAGARIA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR KHAGARIA 3. THE SUPERINTEDENT OF POLICE KHAGARIA 4. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER KHAGARIA 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KHAGARIA 6. THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OF CHITRAGUPTA NAGAR, P.S. KHAGARIA 7. SURYA NARAYAN PASWAN @ SURYA KUMAR NIRALA S/O TARNI PASWAN R/O VILL MAHDA BANNI, P.O. BABU BAGICHA , P.S.MAHESH KHUNT, DISTT- KHAGARIA 8. CHUNUR PASWAN S/O LATE HARKHIT PASWAN MOHALLA 25 LOHIYA NAGAR, P.O. KOSHI COLLEGE, KHAGARIA, P.S.CHITRAGUPTA NAGAR, DISTT- KHAGARIA ----------- 2. 6.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. On the own showing of the petitioner from his pleadings and documents to the writ application, the controversy essentially relates to a private dispute with regard to lands vis-à-vis respondent nos. 7 and 8. The petitioner has already invoked his remedies under Code of Criminal Procedure by proceedings under Sections 107 Cr.P.C./144 Cr. P.C. and 116(3) Cr. P.C. by virtue of Misc. Case Nos. 750(M) of 2009 and 757 (M) of 2009 before the S.D.O. Khagaria in which it is submitted that certain reports have also been submitted. It also appears that there is other criminal litigation between the petitioner and 2 private respondents under Sections 323, 341 and 504 of the Penal Code and Section 3 & 4 of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. It appears that the petitioner has also made an application for initiation of proceedings under Section 188 of the Penal Code against the private respondents for alleged disobedience of interim orders of the S.D.O. Khagaria. The dispute being purely private in nature, there is no occasion for the writ Court to entertain the writ application. Proceedings having been initiated under the Code of Criminal Procedure between the parties, let the same be concluded expeditiously in accordance with law after hearing all concerned including private respondents preferably within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)