IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1485 of 2006 KAPILESHWAR PANDEY Versus SRI RAM PRAKASH PANDEY ----------- 3 28.11.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court when the same issue had become final between the parties by an order dated 4.5.2006, the same could not have been reopened by another application which has been rejected by the impugned order. The only ground taken for reopening the order dated 4.5.2006 being non-consideration of a binding precedent, has been considered by the Court below and it has been found that the order dated 4.5.2006 did not suffer from any error apparent on the face of the record, so as to exercise the power of review. As a matter of fact, the prayer of recall of the order dated 4.5.2006 was only seeking review of the order and therefore, had to be decided strictly in terms of Order-XLVII of the Code of Civil Procedure. That being so, if the Court below in the impugned order has found no justifiable reason to review its order dated 4.5.2006, this Court would not find any jurisdictional error in such approach of the Court below. Accordingly, this Civil Revision application being wholly misconceived is hereby dismissed. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)