BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Tenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13033 of 2011 1 S.KANIVALAN 2 S.AROCKIYADOSS 3 R.RAMAMOORTHY 4 S.DOSS ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 to 4 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SALAIGRAMAM POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.114 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S.M.AJMAL KHAN ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDY GOVT. ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC.438 CR.P.C. ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- Apprehending arrest, the petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 to 4 in Crime No.114 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 324, 427, 379(NP), 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code, have come forward with this petition seeking for anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of the prosecution, due to some previous motive, these petitioner developed quarrel with the de-facto complainant and caused simple hurt. They have also caused damage to the property worth Rs.500/- and took away Rs.6,000/- from the defacto complainant. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and these allegations are absolutely false. Due to some civil dispute between the parties, the present case has been falsely foisted upon the petitioners. 4.The learned Government Advocate[Crl side] would submit that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital. 5.Having regard to the nature of allegations and the nature of injuries and also the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Ilayankudi, on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-[Rupees Ten Thousand only] with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. sd/- 10/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ILAYANKUDI. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SALAIGRAMAM POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC TO M/S.M.AJMAL KHAN ADVOCATE SR.NO.35076. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13033 of 2011 Date :10/10/2011 2P/6C RPB : 11.10.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/