HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR WR!TPETmC)N(Cr.lNQ.34070F^009 PETiTIONERS 1. Smt. Santoshi Manikpuri, wife of Shrf iyiannu Manikpuri, aged about 28 years. resident of Bangaiipara, Sarkanda, iilaspur. 2. Mannu @ Shyam Das Manikpuri, son of Shri Ram Das Manikpuri, aged 33 years, resident of Bangalipara, Sarkanda, Bilaspur. RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Secretary, Ministry of Bhawan, Raipur. 2. The Superintendent of Police, District 3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Sarkanda, Bilaspur. 4. Shri Ashok Sharma, Assistent Sub Inspector, Police Station Sarkanda, Bilaspur. 5. Vijay Yadav alias Chhotu, son of Shri Surendra Yadav, aged about 19 ysars, resident of Gali No.3, Bangaiipara, Sarkanda, Bilaspur. 6. Umesh Sidar, son of Shri R.S. Sidar, aged about 33 ysars, resident of Bangalipara; Sarkanda, Biiaspur. , (Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Sinale Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri, J. :- Shri B.P. Sharma and Shri K. Sharma, counsei for the petitioners. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate Tor the State. OROER (ORAU (Passed on this 15 day of Juiy, 1. Heard iearned counsel for the parties. 2. Chaiienge in this petition is to the iodging of First Information Report (FIR) under crime No.111/2009 for offences punishabie under the provisions of Sections 294, 506 & 323 read with Sectfon 34 of the indian Penal Code (!PC). -•2-" c t-7 ••^ :s'.. s '-aaa^ fS Qown 3. The main plank of argument of Shri Shrma, learned counsei appearing for the petitioners, is that the City Superintendent of Poiice in his report to the Superintendent of Police dated 20-5-2009 (Annexure - P/4) has stated that no case has been made out against the petitioners by Shri Ashok Sharma, Assistant Sub Inspector. 4. in normal course, this Court should not interfere with the investigation by the poiice on a report lodged by a person in Polics Station. Be that as it may, since the case ss at the investigation stage, the petitioners are at liberty to bring this fact into the notice of ttie Superintendent of Police or investigating Officer, for taking appropriate action 5. In view offoregoing, the writ petition is dismis^d. Sd/- 1 SatishK.Agnihotrl Judge