; ^B^g^:®, '^•^s^^-^ wsssss '^SSf^-S^f'^ -Hi^l@oi®K' FliaBlaNisiai®^^^ PETmONERS. :M*MffiiKi§8gcasiafia^i;s:i^::^ 1. Sanjeev Tiwari ^o .AmBika.^ years, RA) yillage Post Saldha, Tahsil Berla, District Durg(CG). 2. Roman Lal Vishwakarma, S/o Khemraj Vishwakarma aged about 33 years, R/o Village Parsoda, Post B/Jamgaon (Balod) Tahsil Balod, DistrictDurg(CG). 3. Tikam Kumar Vemia S/o Nilkanth Verma, aged about 29 years, Village Post Chicha, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg. 4. Rohit Kumar Singare S/o Shri Baldu Ram Singare, aged about Gram WRS colony QRNo 142/1, Type-I, Railway Colony Raipur (CG). 5. Vishnu Kymar Sahu, S/o Shri Mahettar Prasad Sahu, aged about 28 years, R/o Village Bhandarpur Post Singhangarh, District KabeerdSiam (CG). 6. Ved Prakash Rajput S/o Sukhnandan Singh Rajput, R/o Village Post : Bhatgaon, Tahsil Saja, District Durg(CG). 7. Moti Lal Nishad S/o Bhukhau Ram Nishad, Aged about 30 years, R/o village Bhandarpur, Post Singhangarh, Tahsil & Distt. Kabirdham (CG). 8. Nihali Sahu S/o Ankau Ram Sahu aged about 28 years, R/o village Salhekala, Post Kutelikala, Tahsil Chhui Khadan, District Rajnandgaon (CG). Santram Sahu, S/o Jitram Sahu Aged about 43 years, R/o Village Bhursatola, Post Dongrabhala, Tahsil Chhui Khadan, District Rajnandgaon (CG). lO.Shankar Prasad Verma S/o Ramkhilawan Verma, aged about 22 years R/o Village Takam, Post Patora, Tahsil Beria, District Durg (CG). ll.Hiramani Sahu S/o Bodhi Ram Sahu, aged about 28 years, R/'o Viliage Gramkas Street - 3, Block-D, Sector-6, Bhilai, District Durg. 12.Smt. Chanda Bai D/o Uttam Kumar Sinha, aged about 25 years, R/o village & Post Ghotwani, Tahsil Dhamdha, District.Durg (CG). IS.K-umari Nita Sahu, D/'o Dhelau Rani Sahu, aged about 26 years, R/o Village Bagai, Post Rakse, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg (CG). 14.Kamleshwari Sahu D/o Rakesh Sahu, aged about 25 years, R/o Bajrang Para Kohka, District Durg (CG). 15.Madhu Chandel D/o Shri Shebhram Chandel Aged about 31 years, R/o village Kaaibera, Post Khodmudi, Tahsil Chhui Khadan Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG). 16-Mukesh Kumar S/o Ramesk Kumar Aged about 20 years R/o vi!lage Kogatola, Post Santra, Talisil Batod: ntsfnct niirg fCGY. o rJ-^"-7^^^^^^1:TT'^^<^^^¥^^^?^?^'??^-^'5^4 :^--t 22 RESPONDENTS 17.CMianshyam^Sa&S/oShriToranMSatiy,'aged^a^ 24 years, R/o village Borai, Posf Damoda, District Durg(CG). IS.Pyarelal S/o Dindayal Sahu, aged about 20 years, R/o village Mohdi, Post vijaytala, Tahsil Rainandgaon(CG). 19.Pila Ram Venna S/o Shri Raj Kumar Venna, aged about 25 years, R/o village Munglatola, Post Boi-tara, Tahsil Saja, District Durg (CG). 20.Rishi Kumar Kurre S/o Balranjeet Kurre, aged about 28 years, R/o Villa^ & Post Ghotha, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg. 21.Savita Maskole D/o Sunder Lal Maskole, aged about 27 years R/o village Bhirgaon, Tahsil Bhanupratappur, District Kanker. t. Sumitra Bhuarya D/o Murlidhar Bhuarya, aged about 23 years R/o village Podi, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (CG). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Collector, Durg, District Durg (CG). 3. Jila Panchayat Durg Through its Chief Executive Officer, Durg (CG). 4. Janpad Panchayat Saja, through its Chief Executive Officer District Durg (CG). (WRIT PETI'nON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS'HTUnON OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Aenihotri. J.) Present : Shri Vivek Rathore, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 21 day ofJaly, 2008) With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing fmally. 1. The petitioners were appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade III on 29.06.2007 (Annexure P/l) and posted at different schools in Janpad Pancnayat, Saja,' District Durg (CG). All ofa sudden, without afFording ., any opportunity of hearing, the appointment of the petitioners were terminated on 11.07.2008 (Annexure P/4) on the ground that fhe certificates prodaced bv the netnioners were talse: Sahu 2. Leamed counsel appearing for tiie petitioners submits fhat the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by thejudgment and order dated 14th March, 2008 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 95/2008 (Ku. Punam & Olfaers Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters. 3. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, leamed counsel appearing,for the State, submits that the issue raised herein has already been concluded by the decision in the case ofPunam (Supra). 4.Thus, this petition is accordingly disposed ofin the same terms that the petitioners be afforded a.n opportunity of hearing to establish ^enuineness, trufhfiilness of the certificates produced by them before passing an order oftennination, subject to verification ofthe facts. The impugned order dated 11.07.2008 (Annexure P/4) is accordingly quashed. No order asto costs. Sd/- sa^K.Agn,hotri Judge c?^l-