^ 'T^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS^AIHI AT WUVSPOS. Appucyurr Respoadents Veraus 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. C.R. 67/10 Karshaa Das Tbakkar, Son of Shri Devji Thakkar, Resident of Pandri, Thaoa Psuidri, District Raipur, Towa, Tehsil and Dfatriet Ralptir, Chhattisgarh. Smt. Rafh Bai, Wife of LE^ Sundar Lal, agcd 28 years, Deepak, son of Late Sundar Lal, aged 7 years, through her mofher Sint Rath Bal, Wiie of Late Sundar Lal, Baishakhu Rain, Son of Late Ranajeevaa, ^ed 59 years, Smt. Keshri Bai wMe of Late BsAhakhu Ram, aged 52 yesus. AU above the resident of 'VSayc Kochera, Post Office Bhimknnhar, Tehsil Dondflohaia, District Durg (C.G.). Boanl Memaysr, Oriental tasuranoe Compaay Lunited, fhrough Board Office, Malviya Nagar, Duig (C.G.). CWIL REVISION UNDBR SECTION 115 OF CIVIL PROCanjRB CODE 1908. (SB :Hon*ble Ux. T.P.Sfaaarma, J.) Present:- Shri Sachin Sin^i Rajput, Advocate for the applicant/petlttoher. Shri Vishnu Koshta, Advocate for the respondents No. 1 to 4. Shri Hanuman Prasad Agrawal, Advocate forthe respondent Nb.5 QRAL-ORDSa (Passedon 03/09/2010> 1. By ttus civU revlsion petitioner/owuer of fhc vehieite laave chaUengcd fhe legaUty and proprie^ offhe order dated 20/9/2005 passed by 1°* Additioxial Motor Accident Claitas Tritnmal, R^nandgaon Chhatttegarh (m shfflrt fhe Tribunal^ ia olaiia M.J.C. No. 27/2002 whcreby appUeation fited muler Order -9 Rule 13 of fhe Civil PTOcedzu-e Code, 1908 for settii^ aside tfae expartB awseeS. has been dismisscd on the ground of maintaniabiM^. E3Q)arte ;-*'r^ t'^i ^/ ^^jjP" ^ award agaiast prcsent pctitioner has beea passed by the Claiaas Tribuaal m claim case No. 26/2000 applfcation for settmg aside fhe expartB award was filed by the petitioner before Clauns Tribzmal same was disinissed ®nthe srcnuid nf mnmtamahlHty that saiae fa not xnaintainablc. Shri Sachin Siagh Rajpnt, Advocate for the applicaBt/petitioaer and Shri Vishnu Koshta, Advocate for the Bcspondeate No. l to 4 aud Shri Hanuman I'rasad Agrawal, Advocate for the respoadent No.5 are heard. Learaed counsel for the parties fisaakty subinits that applicatkm &r setting aside fhe awatd passed cxparte is maiataiaabte vmder the law. No specific proviaon has becn naadc ia the Motor Veiucles Act for setting asidc fhe awaad passed exparte and Tribunal is required to regulate its owa procedure and without any provisions Tribunal is capabte for dccidu^ fhe award exparte a^iast any party aiNl saiae Tnbunal is also coiapetent to set-aside fhe exparte onder passed ayaiast aay party. Consequentty, civfl revision is aUowed, Otder impug?Md dated 20/9/2005 is hereby sct -aside. Parties are direoted to appgar befoie the 1st Additional Motor Accidcnt Claims Tribuaal, Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh on 6/10/2010 for tather hearing of claim M.J.C. No, 27/2002. No order as to oosts. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^^•^-^Ss?l£5