In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 1926 of 2009 Date of decision: April 15, 2009 Gurdev Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Balwant Singh and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Manish Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J The only ground challenging the partition proceedings is that the partition conducted by the Revenue Department is bad for partial partition. The petitioner could raise such objections before the Revenue Court only. The learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgment rendered in case Sri Thimmaiah vs. Shabira and Ors. 2008 (2) CCC 277 (SC), stating that the plaintiff has to establish that he is in possession in order to entitle him for a decree for permanent injunction, but the present case is on different footings. The partition order was passed by the Revenue Court which is being executed. In the circumstances this order apparently does not suffer from any illegality. Dismissed. April 15, 2009 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge