(^ve^ IH THE mOH COURT OF CHHATTI80ARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No.2^°-/2003 / PETITIONER KESPONDENTS Versus 1. Gurudeo Prasad Rafhore, S/ o Late Shri Guha Ram RathOTe, aged about 28 years, R/ o Vmage- Hala HuUi, Tehsil- Kharasia, Distt. Raigarh (C.O.) State of Chhattisgarhs Throu^i Secretary, Paachayat & Social WeUare Departm.ent,Mantralaya, Shastri Chowk, Eaipiir {C.Cr.}. Deputy Director (Admu'iistration), Paachayat & Social Welfare, Raigarh (0.0.). Joint Director (A<imimstration), Panchayat & Social WeUare, Raigarh(C.G.). CoUector, Raigarh (C.G.). 2. 3. 4. PETITOH UBDER ARTICLE 326/327 OFTHE COaSTITUTIOIT OF IKDIA FOR ISSUANCE 0V A 8UITABLE WSIT, ORDEai OR DIRECTIOII TO DO JOSTXGE I» THE MATTER. XI-HC-22 sn^r'w Vw'b ssSss sft+iiq» ^t?a 'S^ ••wwvm,w^w , hwwy. 3ii^r ira^ __..i»lp..%AQ.A. ^ •^—^ <fl»1CTISIiWI<W"'~~'""""""'~"'~"~~""'^2003 (tltniisr'"""""•"""""""" a<A<t<tdiw^iw 30.8.2003: Shri Prosharit Jaiswat leams Shpi Ranbir Sinoh G.A. toke ^d eounse! for the pelltloner. ,^ notice forpesponden+s. Heard both the counse!. This writ pe+ition has bee ,t77~I <i a»a> ST11 respondents to provide eompassioni The ease of the petitioner petltioner namely late Shri Suha Sahay-ak sn Block Khar'sia who dii eertifieo+e Anncxurc P-t. The uppointment on 5.12.1998 vide pefflioner Tor eompassionoTe ap| reco.Tsmended by the Deputy is fiied along with the petition beout" &ireetor agoin infermed tl 23.10.99 (AtnexUdE P-4| directed to csn'tact't'he beputy &i^< Depamnent, ftuigorh| Vide ieti'er (j< the petition as Anncxyre P-i 1.11.2001 N reflurast ct»11qi?l^^I*tcif^ t^<<3 ^4<^i< ^ oiSai wiSia preferred by the petitioner under |n of Indio seeMng a direction ta thi lite-appointment to •f+ie petitioner. in brief is •rtiat the.father of the |Ram Rathors was worklng as Srom tf whtle beiiw in service vide +itioner applied for eompassionate Oin'hnent was also fcirwairded and vide letter dated l8,&.99-whlch ind marked os AnneXure P-3. The le-Jeint &irector in eonnestien with the request of the petilionej* fsi* ^empossionnte appointinen* vldc !ct!'er Thei'eafter the petitloner was ector, :Panchayutand|Social Welfure afed 24.2,2000 whicfi is annexed to Subsequently, vide: letter dated g:the compassionatejappeintmen't- rf. v ^ XI-HC-22 sm^ii^i R-ti.* 3d|si ^•ff^? ^t<?fl r •^ &. 'g^sij-qRpi, axifcKi^Ritiiwp: ttmctfUtSiw 3^?r trag? __t^.e.2Ajl20;,. —-Z- "^. 20ft ^ f^g' a<A»i<wiwafc( the petitioner was writt'en to the C<t the petition as Annexure B-6. Couhsel for the petitloner Sii' •..." '.'• ': of Chhdttisgar'h has formulated d ^uidelines for thecompassionate a^ sitnitted that the State Sovernment poiicy dated 10.6.2003 providim arfpoin'hnent, which is dnneaed to the stition as F-7. Coun guidelines issued by +he State |8overnment ef ChhdTtisgarh the petitioner is fully eligibSe for the e4mpassionate appoinftnen?.- heapd counsel for ths sd&tjlj i.i' t^eommendations made by the Dep ease of tiie COtftS is not even taki?^ any decisian on the appli compossionnte appoinnhent, which ^as been duiy recomniended by the bcputy bsrcctor. He furthsr aubmitNd for appsintment is s' i • .' luidelines of the State er Having heapd the counsel ftr facts ond cipcuinstances of the casel eppropria+e to direct the petitionerl *Kl(i;'t<il'< MNcif ^fvS <fa«si< i??lSOT2BI^I lector, Raigarh whleh is anriexed to submitted that in tamis of the sartles. eounsel fsr ?he petit|oner sub.'nltS'ed that in spite of th' ty DirecMr. the Joint Director is petitioner for ths Sompassionate nse! fwr the petjtione" the Joint the request of the petitionei* nop ation of the petltloner for the that the case of the petitioner jarely coversd by thej newly issued dated 10.6.2003, the parties ond cpnsidercd the I am of the opinion that it wiii be •to make adetailed represen+a+ie! r XI-HC-22 3B^(W Ri-li^> al^t si»*tt<ti «E?d € r lit1'! ^^'ilw<M, wSw ,Svu<sy. *<(*Rtl<tt*IT«B Jf^3R ^.J^^'.^^.Q—- :-s,- 'm. 3w^ to the respondent,No.3 for comf days from today,, On receipt o petitjoner the respondent sholt coi issued'guidelines of the State ol r>9 onler with re< eol iction n Bssionate appointment within thipty F the representa'Moff fiied by rte isidep the same in view of the newiy ChhatHsgarh and pass apprspriate request of the petitiener appointment and ji^tiinate to the pe+iTioner about the on his ropresenfatlon| Ordered The Writ petition sTands di^iosed of, q»t*ifct^i^F^ffi "^ Ts^t <^$X "^ •EttFct*! 3^^ Sd/- L.C.Bhadoi ^udge A E^Ri