IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the March 30th, 2006 Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 172 of 2006 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Sonu S/o Late Prakash R/o village Basavakheri P.S. Jhabarera District Haridwar, U.A. …. Applicant. Versus State of Uttaranchal . Respondent. ___________________________________________________ Arising out of case crime No. 70/2005 Under Sections 302 IPC Police Station –Jhabarera District Haridwar Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat,J. Heard Sri Dharmesh Kumar learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant was not nominated in the FIR. Only evidence against the applicant is that he was lastly seen in the company of the deceased and Sukkar has narrated this fact. It is alleged that Sukkar saw the applicant taking liquor with the deceased. It was further contended that there is no other evidence against the applicant except the evidence of Sukkar. It was also contended that the chain of circumstances in which the incident took place is not complete. Considering the aforesaid contentions, facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case for bail. Let the applicant-accused be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat,J. ) Dated 30.03.2006 LSR