IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7890 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 4 , 2010 Ms. Sulochna Devi .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH. PRESENT: Mr. Sanjeev K. Tamak, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Maloo Chahal, DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Counsel for the State points out that the total cost of Rs.8000/- ordered on 16.7.2010 and 20.4.2010 has been deposited. Counsel further submits that the necessary relief, as claimed in the writ petition, has been granted. As per the State counsel, this writ petition is rendered infructuous. Reply has been handed over in the Court today and the same is taken on record. Let the copy of the same be supplied to the counsel for the petitioner and so also the order passed in favour of the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. If the petitioner is still left with any grievance, she may file fresh writ petition to raise the same. October 4 , 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE