SBCWP NO.9283/2007. 1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9283/2007. Shammi Nagpal and ors. Vs. Smt.Chandra Kanta Bhatia and ors. Date of order :- 23/1/2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI Shri R.K. Mathur for the petitioners. *** Against the order dated 7/8/2007, this writ petition has been preferred. Grievance of the petitioners is that the plaintiff non-petitioner moved an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for impleadment of certain persons as party-respondents based on the pleading of the petitioners in the written statement. It is stated that while submitting written-statement, defendant-petitioners stated that he has already sold part of the land to many of the persons who are now required to be impleaded as party respondents. It is otherwise a fact that plaintiff non-petitioner has preferred suit for cancellation of sale-deed of the property existing in favour of defendant- petitioner and if in the pleading it is already stated that out of the suit property, part has further been sold to others and if those in whose favour part of the property is sold are made as a party-defendant, firstly so far as the petitioner is concerned, his rights are not effected and now looking to the nature of the suit, persons in whose SBCWP NO.9283/2007. 2 favour suit property has been sold by the petitioners because not only proper but necessary party because without their presence even if the suit is ultimated decreed, their right may be effected and on that count even if decree is passed in favour of plaintiff then, execution of decree would be delayed. In view of above, the writ petition having no merit is dismissed as I do not find any error in the order under challenge. (M.N. BHANDARI), J. anil