C.R No. 3138 of 2009 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R No. 3138 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : April 22, 2010 Baljit Kaur, ...... Petitioner (s) v. Darshan Singh and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. S.S.Ghanghas, Advocate for Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Awasthy, Advocate for the respondents. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This petition has been filed against concurrent orders of the Courts below dismissing the application for temporary injunction to the petitioner/plaintiff wherein she had prayed that her parents and brothers be restrained from interfering in her possession over the alleged ancestral house. Both the Courts below have prima facie found that the property in dispute is the self acquired property of respondent No.1 which was C.R No. 3138 of 2009 (O&M) ::2:: purchased on 30.10.1970. The Courts below have also found that the petitioner was not in possession of the property in dispute. Counsel for the petitioner has not been able to persuade me that these findings of fact suffer from such material irregularity or illegality as would require interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, this petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. As the main petition has since been dismissed, all the pending civil miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) April 22, 2010. JUDGE `kk'