1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8360/05 Danveer Singh & Anr. vs. State Date of order : 6/4/2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri R.D. Tripathi for the petitioner. Shri Pradeep Kalwania, Addl. Govt. Counsel for the respondents. ****** Learned counsel for the petitioner has cited the judgement of coordinate bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7080/02, Bhonri Lal Sharma vs. State & Ors. and connected four writ petitions in which the similar writ petition was allowed with the following direction: “20. In the result, all the writ petitions are allowed and the respondent-State is directed to consider the case of the petitioners for appointment against 248 vacancies of LDCs which were vacant on 1.8.2005 in case less meritorious persons have been appointed either on the basis of district-wise list or state-wise list on the post of LDC. In case of appointment, the petitioners will not be entitled for the arrears of salary. However, the petitioners will be entitled for seniority.” 2 Learned counsel for the respondents opposed the writ petition but was not in a potion to distinguish the aforesaid judgement wherein the direction was issued to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment against 248 vacancies of LDCs, which were vacant on 1.8.05 in case any lesser meritorious person has been appointed either on the basis of district-wise list or state-wise list. The same direction shall be applied to the case of the petitioner as well. The writ petition is accordingly allowed with the aforesaid direction. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/