IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2009 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1419 of 2009(S) ---------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.26553/2009 DATED 01/10/2009 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------- NAVEEN S.ANAND, S/O.R.S.VADHYAR, AGED 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT NAVADEEP HOUSE NO.146, VNA VINAYAKA NAGAR, KAIMANOM, PAPPANAM CODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. MR.MANOJ R.NAIR MR.P.RAVEENDRAN PILLAI RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------- P.S. MOHAMMED SAGEER,WORKING AS SECRETARY THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION, CORPORATION OFFICE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (AGE AND THE NAME OF THE FATHER OF THIS RESPONDENT IS NOT KNOWN AND HENCE THE SAID PARTICULARS ARE NOT INCLUDED). BY ADV. MR.P.K. MANOJ KUMAR. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... CONT.CASE.NO.1419 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed this contempt case on the plea that Annexure A3 has been rendered contracting the directions in Annexure A2 judgment of this court in as much as that judgment contains the requirement to abide by Annexure A1 order of the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institution. The parties have no dispute that Annexure A3 is appealed against by the petitioner before the Tribunal and the matter is listed even today. Under such circumstances, I do not deem it necessary or appropriate to initiate action under the Contempt of Court Act. Hence this matter is dismissed without prejudice to the proceedings before the Tribunal. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/11/12