Hemaram Soneshv»'ari, S/'o. Shyamlal Soneshwari, aged 58 % years, resicientof viitage & Post Arang, Distt. Raipur'(CG). Bt 1) The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary', General Administration Department of D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2) The Colteotor, Distt. Raipur (CG). (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the CoriStitiAbn of tndia) i,^. Shri Vinod Deshmukh, counsel for the pettttoner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate forfcheState. •w (Passedon this 27s'day of August, With the consent of learned counsel appeanng for the parties, the petition is heard finally. . . 1) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitloner does not want to press tnis petltion on merits at this stage. However, the petitioner prays that the representation dated 13-8-2008 (Annexure P/4) pending before the concerned authorities may be directed to be considered and decidsd, In accordance with law, within the prescribed time. 2) S'nri Bhatia, learneci Dy. Govt. Advocate appearing for the State submits that there is no reason why the pending rspresentation shouid not be decided by the concemed authority, expeditiousiy. 3} in view of the foregoing, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the ooncerned authorities to consider and decide the representation as stated above, in accordance with iaw, on its own merits, as early as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a oopy of this order. Mr. Bhatia further sub'mits that no coercive steps shalt be taken agalnstthe petitfoner, tJHthe disposa!,of the repres'entation. . _ 4) ! hope and trust that the State Government shal.l examine the representation objectively in accordance with !aw and guidellnes, issued by the Government time fo time. ' inviewoftheabove, I.A.No.1 aiso standsdisposed of. Sd/- SatishK.AgniItotri r^y^Judge" tls^a^-js+^risAdip^^irt''W^<;T—^'^3f;^