1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL STAMP NO. 14969 OF 2009. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & N.D. DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE : 4th August, 2009 PER COURT : 1. Appeal taken up for admission. 2. Heard Shri Latange, learned counsel for the appelant. 3. Shri Latange, submits that the learned Single Judge has failed to take into consideration the fact that the calculation of the date by the learned Industrial court was not proper. He, therefore, submits that an error apparent on the face of the record has occasioned, requiring the present appellant to file the present appeal. 4. The learned Industrial Court had allowed the complaint filed by the respondent/employee. The learned Single Judge, while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution has found 2 that the petitioner has failed to make out a case for interference. 5. We do not find any error committed by the learned Single Judge to invoke the appellate jurisdiction. 6. Hence, the appeal is rejected. [N.D. DESHPANDE,J.] [B.R. GAVAI , J.] grt/-