IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINRY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3612 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO. 2981 OF 2006 Shashi Ramjilal Sharma ....Plaintiff V. Anil Kapoor and others .....Defendants Mr. Kukreja i/b M/s. Kukreja & Co. for the plaintiff Mr. O.D. Goswami for the defendant No. 1,3 to 5. CORAM : A.A. SAYED, J DATE : 17TH JUNE , 2009 P.C. The learned Counsel for defendant Nos. 1,3,4 & 5, makes a statement that the defendant Nos. 1,3,4 & 5 have no intention to enter the plaintiff’s residence and they will not enter the plaintiff’s residence or plaintiff’s family member’s office as set out in prayer clause (b) of the Motion. The statement is accepted. So far as the prayer clause (a) of the Motion is concerned, the learned Counsel for the defendant Nos. 1,3,4 & 5 states that the statement made at the ad interim stage as recorded in the order dated 19-10-2006 may be continued. The statement is accepted. 2 In view of the above, the learned Counsel for the plaintiffs does not press the Motion. The Notice of Motion is therefore, disposed of in terms above. 3 Liberty to the plaintiff to take out fresh Motion in the event of any fresh grievances in relation to the allegations in the Notice of Motion. A.A.SAYED, J.