1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 401/2008 (Sandeep Vinodkumar Jaiswal Vs. The Superintendent, Prohibition & Excise) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. Subhash Paliwal, Adv. For the petitioner. Mr. N.W. Sambre, G.P. For R- 1 & 2. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : JUNE 5, 2008. Heard Mr. Paliwal, the learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Sambre, the learned G.P., for respondents. The counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the respondent no.1 has filed an affidavit dated 10/4/2008 and in para 21 of the said affidavit, it is mentioned that in view of the present policy of the Government as reflected in Circular dated 19/9/2007, the claim of the petitioner cannot be granted at this stage. However, it is opened for the petitioner to approach the Government for appropriate orders. 2 The learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the above referred facts, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the State Government accordingly. Mr. Sambre, the learned Government Pleader, has not objected the said request. In the circumstances, writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. All the issues are kept open. JUDGE JUDGE RMP