IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5708 of 2010 1. SITA RAM PRASAD, son of late Latlu Mandal, resident of village-Chuna Kothi, P.S.-Haweli Kharagpur, Distt.-Munger. 2. Jai Kumar Prasad, son of Late Kishori Mandal, resident of village-Chuna Kothi, P.S.-Haweli Kharagpur, Dist-Munger. 3. Ram Balak Ram, son of Late Ganesh Ram, Resident of village- Panhar, P.S.-Khodaganj, Dist-Nalanda. 4. Ganesh Prasad Mandal, son of Late Sham Lal mandal, resident of village-Gangania, P.s.-Sultanganj, Dist-Bhagalpur. 5. Subhash Chandra Dixit, son of Late Shree Rajeev Lochan Distit, resident of village Ghogha, P.S.-Ghogha, Dist-Bhagalpur. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Secretary cum commissioner, Department of Industries, Govt. of Bihar. 2. The Secretary Cum commissioner, department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The director of Handloom and Sericulture, Department of Industries Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Assistant Director Industries, Sericulture, Bhagalpur. 5. The General Manager, District Industry Centre and Malwari Extension cum Training Centre, Ranipokhar, Vaishali. 6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ----------- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Kumar Malunde, Adv. For the State :-Mr. Ashok Kumar Kesari, AAG-11 For Accountant General Bihar Patna.:- Mr. Binod Kumar Labh, SC 2 5.1.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of this writ application all the petitioners, except petitioner No. 2, have been allowed the benefits of A.C.P. Scheme in July, 2010. He submits that the monetary benefits of the same has however not been paid to them so far. The respondents are therefore directed to release the monetary benefits of the said A.C.P. Scheme to the four 2 petitioners in whose cases orders have been passed. So far petitioner No. 2 is concerned, he shall be at liberty to file a representation before the competent authority for necessary orders allowing him the benefits of A.C.P. Scheme in accordance with law. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the benefit of 6th pay revision has also not been extended to the petitioners. The petitioners will be at liberty to represent for the same also and their representations may be considered by the respondents and appropriate order in accordance with law may be passed preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of the representations. With the aforesaid observations and directions this writ application is disposed of. Prakash ( J.N.Singh, J.)