IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 18TH MAY 2010 / 28TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 6860 of 2010(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): 1 ---------------- PINACKAL ZAKIR HUSSAIN,GENERAL SECRETARY BLOCK CONGRESS COMMITTEE,ERAVIPURAM RESIDING AT THODIYIL VEEDU,HOUSE NO.140,THATTAMALA NAGAR, VADAKKEVILA.P.O,KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.PRATHEESH.P RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,SECRETARIAT,TRIVANDRUM. 2. MR.R.RAJESH,MANAGING DIRECTOR,KERALA STATE CASHEW WORKERS APEX INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD(CAPEX),P.B.NO.262,KADAPPAKKADA, KOLLAM. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, VIKAS BHAVAN,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, SECRETARIAT,TRIVANDRUM. 5. THE SECRETARY,LEGISLATURE SECRETARIAT, LEGISLATURE COMPLEX,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.SREEDHARAN NAIR FOR R2 SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR FOR R2 GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.K.RAMESH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 6860 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 18th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T From a reading of the averments in the writ petition, it is abundantly clear that the petitioner is not in any way personally affected by the allegations against the 2nd respondent. That being so, this writ petition is in the nature of a public interest litigation. But the petitioner has not chosen to constitute it as a public interest litigation. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge