: 1 : FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.704 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.818 OF 2008 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3360 OF 2007 IN S.C.SUIT NO.4536 OF 2006 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s . orders or directions and . Registrar’s orders . -------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.A.M. Saraogi for the Appellant. None for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 16TH OCTOBER, 2008. P.C. : 1. The impugned order itself makes it clear that the plaint was allowed to be amended. This, Mr.Saraogi states, was on the basis that the Defendants had allegedly wrongly re-entered upon the premises. Thus in any event it would be necessary for the Appellant to take out a fresh Notice of Motion. Such Notice of Motion, if filed, will be decided on its : 2 : own merits. The learned Judge hearing the Notice of Motion in any event shall not be bound by the observations from the impugned order. 2. In the circumstances, the Appeal from Order is accordingly disposed of. The Civil Application is also disposed of.