IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.12522 of 2008 Date: 29th October, 2010 Between: Sajida Begum .. Petitioner And The Sub-Inspector of Police, Moinabad Police Station, Ranga Reddy district & another. .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.12522 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus directing the respondents not to harass the petitioner and her family members by summoning them to Moinabad Police Station, Ranga Reddy district or restraining the petitioner and her sons from visiting their land. There is no necessity of going into all the details. In the counter filed Respondent No.1, at paragraphs 6 and 7, it is stated as under: “On a complaint lodged by the son of the petitioner, a case in Cr.No.82 of 2008 was registered against the persons who are the defendants in O.S.No.322 of 2007 and investigated into. The son of the petitioner also produced a copy of the order of the Hon’ble Court to this respondent wherein the Hon’ble Court directed this respondent to provide police aid whenever it is required to protect the property from the acts of the respondents. I submit that since both parties i.e., the complainant/son of the petitioner and the alleged accused who are the defendants in the suit filed by the petitioner herein are having a dispute with regard to the boundaries since the lands belonging to both sides are adjacent, a letter was addressed by this respondent to the Revenue Divisional Officer, to get the land surveyed and to fix up the boundaries so as to enable this respondent police to provide police protection as per the directions of the Hon’ble Court. I submit that this respondent police is always ready and willing to provide police protection as and when it is required by the petitioner. I respectfully submit that I never interfered with the civil disputes and I never harassed the petitioner and never directed her not to visit her land. I never summoned the petitioner to the police station at any point of time. In fact, on her son’s complaint, a case was registered against the defendants in the said suit.” In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to interfere with the civil disputes and not to harass the petitioner and her family members by calling them to Police Station, except as required under law. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 29.10.2010 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.12522 of 2008 29.10.2010