IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.Misc.No.M-4800 of 2011 Date of Decision: February 15, 2011 Parshotam Dass Rampal .......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr.Sanjiv Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. <><><> RITU BAHRI, J.(Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to take all the pleas before the trial Court. He is allowed to do so. During the pendency of the trial, personal appearance of the petitioner is exempted with the following conditions: (i) petitioner shall be represented through counsel; (ii) shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings; (iii) shall not dispute his identity as an accused: (iv) shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in his absence but in the presence of his counsel; (v) shall appear before the trial Court as and when required by the trial Court; and (vi) any other condition which the learned trial Court may impose. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( RITU BAHRI ) February 15, 2011 JUDGE SRM