fflany .? ^ ,'s& BSS^ CSSSE QS sesicsssas ss S&SSSS^B. »e^Q»S^\^S/wo9 &aKhaalal Sao S/0 Madm* M®banSao aged aboat 22 y^aca l^/& HefeaagaiTSlecfc aaa P.Sw PuasotDisrt* Ralgaril M.B* IttS-bate ®fMoB'* 'bhBough the Secretary PaatAiaya't BeiiaartBea^ Vallabfa Bbawaa 2eSSttb BfcrtsieBaI ©fficer(Rgveaue) Salga^. StfSv • , . .. ', , ,' 3»Sran Paaehayafc,. Hetnagar tthreu^ its SaEE>aR<s& T^b. & I3:Lst;» Satgai^ 4» @mt» Bbataa Bai»; Sargsaicit Qraa PaaeKaya't Hetaagac T^. & Bis'fc» Raigarii, S»setlal ^Shoiuhaa S/9 Ute'baai eheafaaa ,; P^<s^Sya-e',:^ZBa^,.©:caa¥Bani^iaya^:' . ",• Ne€Ba®ai^.®^b'.. ;'&- MsK.'Sai.ga^.; »•'&. gKEE ^SIXIES •eaiSS.,SK£^SSS/22'l SIK XSE CSBS'FI'BBTZCM iCT:;IHSI^. a '9 a aw i- ^!fa«ns, f—^ <'~>'~ '< HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2475 of 2000 Petitioaer Lakhanlal Sao Versus Respondents State ofM.P. & ofhers (Writ Petition under Ardcle 226/227 offhe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) ^ Shri Ashish Siirana, Advocate for the petttioner. Shri N. N. Roy, Pauel Lawyer for fhe respondents No. 1 Ss 2. O^R DE R (orall ( Passed on this 23rd day ofNovember, 2009) Heard. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for ftie petitioner submits fhat the petitioner has filed aa application (I.A.No. 1) for withdrawal of fhe writ petition wifh Uberty to take recourse to the other appropriate fonun. 2. Learaed counsel appearing for fhe respondents/State has no objection. 3. In view of the above, fhe appUcation (I.A.No.l) is ordercd, as prayed for. The writ petition is dismissed as wifhdrawn with the above-stated liberty, if so advised. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Tbakur