IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10508 of 2011 Sanjiv Kumar @ Sanjiv Kumar Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3 22-07-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. According to prosecution case, the petitioner gave several dagger blows on the neck of his wife as a result of which, she died then and there. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that according to prosecution case itself, the petitioner had solemnized his love marriage with the deceased and it was the family members of the petitioner who had opposed the marriage of the petitioner and furthermore, the informant himself stated in his fardbeyan that the family members of the petitioner were not ready to accept the petitioner as well as deceased, so there was no occasion for the petitioner to commit the murder of his wife. It is further contended by him that when the further statement of the informant was recorded, he accepted that he had lodged the present case under misconception which is evident from paragraph-6 of the case diary but I am not at all convinced with the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. The son of the deceased as well as some of the witnesses has supported the prosecution story and the injury report of the deceased also corroborates the allegation. 2 Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Baunsi P.S. Case No. 126 of 2010 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 1375 of 2010 pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.-I, Banka stands rejected. However, the learned trial court should expedite the trial of the petitioner and conclude it preferably within one year from the date of receipt of this order. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)