IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 15TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 26TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 5565 of 2008(K) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ AMMUKUTTY SASI D/O.LATE NANU ACHARI, APRVATHI SADANAM, PATHANAD P.O., KANGAZHA, CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.LALJI P.THOMAS RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICAL MAJOR SECTION KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD KANGAZHA,KARUKACHAL, KOTTAYAM. 2. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THE SECRETARY,K.S.E.B,VAIDHYUTHI BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SUB COLLECTOR COLELCTORATE, KOTTAYAM. 4. SMT. REMANI VISHWANATHAN ISWARAYA BHAVAN, PATHANAD P.O. KANGAZHA, KOTTAYAM. R1 & R2 BY STANDING COUNSEL FOR KSEB SRI.P.P.THAJUDIN R3 BY SR. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.5565 OF 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of February, 2008 JUDGMENT Having regard to the nature of the order being issued hereunder, notice to the first respondent is dispensed with, preserving its right to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. The petitioner objects to the drawing of certain electric line. The allegation is that the proposed drawl is in such a way that would affect the usufructs of the petitioner's property. He also states that there is boundary dispute between the parties and that he is taking appropriate action in that regard. Obviously, there is a situation of obstruction. The writ petition is, hence, disposed of directing that the line in question shall not be drawn without obtaining appropriate directions from the Additional District Magistrate, before whom Ext.P1 proceedings are stated to be pending. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge kkb.