-tntiiraa .•it.::-.iit |§ii^. I'MS^^gif ^^ KE6H COURT OF CHHATTES6ARH AT B3LASPUR W-P. &-) No. 1360 of 20)8 Petitioner Versus Req)ondents 1. 2. 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Executive Engineer, Public Works Deparhnent, (Biiilding & Roads), bivision - Balod, bistrict - burg (Chhartisgarh) 5rot. Suima Bai, Widow of Late Shri Pnnnod i&imar Dewangnn, R/o. Mararpuru, Tahsil A Thona - Batod, bistrict - burg (Chhott-i^arh) The Appellate Aul+iorrty cum Deputy Commissioner of Payment of Gratwiy Act, ftaipur (Chhattisgarh) The Controlling Officer, Payment of 6ra1uity Act, 1972, burg, District - burg (Chhott-isgarh) WRTT PETTTOIN UN&ER ARTICE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUnON Sjngte Beneh : Mon'ble Mr- Satish !(. Agnihotri, J- Shr-i Alok Bokshi, 6avt. Advocflte for the petitioner/State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 23rd Ay of April, 2008) 1. With the consent of leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, •the fnatter is taken up for final hearing. 2- The petitioner/State of Chhatt-iqarh impugns the order dated 12.2.2007 (Annexure P/2) passed by the Con+rolling Authori-ty, under the Payinent of Sro+uitv Act, 1972 cum Assistant Lobour' Coniniissioner, burg in Case No. 148/P6A/2005, which was confirined by the order dated 27.9.2007 (Annexure P/4) possed by _£3. ..^5'^-^^. ^,!-"^^ f^'v^.;s?\ s8 a i!2;!^ ^ consiciered in terms and there is no ilkgality, irregularity or perversity m the orders passed by the Courts beiow. 6. It ia well-nigh established thot this Court m exercise of its superyisory jurisdiction under Articte 227 of the Consti-hjtion of India should refrain itself from interferniywith -rtie order pasaed by tha Court- belouf, except in such caaes vAws.rv. perversity. illegoli+y, irregulority or jurisdictional error is writ large on the face of the record. which is not in the present cnse. 7. In view of the foregovng, there is no merit in this petition and the aww. is dismissed. summarily- Thaku- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge