IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2011 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 33515 of 2004(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- A.P.ELDHO S/O. PAULOSE, ALUNKAL HOUSE, ANGAALI VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BIJU ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. SMT.PHILOMINA, W/O. VARIYATHY, PANANGODU PARAMBU, PEECHANIKKADY, ANGAMALI VILLAGE ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI. 3. COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUES, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE OPPOSITE MUSEUM, TRIVANDRUM. ADV. SRI.JOSE THETTAYIL FOR R1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SUDHA DEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31/03/2011, ALONG WITH W.P(C)NO.30830/2005. THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: dmb WP(C).No. 33515 of 2004 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 8.7.2003 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT P2: COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ANGAMALI TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT RECEIVED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 16.7.2003 P3: COPY OF THE COUNTER FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE EXHIBIT P1 COMPLAINT DATED 10.10.2003 P4: COPY OF THE OBJECTION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE REPORT OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ANGAMALI, DATED 30.10.2003 P5: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 4.2.2004 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT P6: COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETIITONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 27.2.2004 P7: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14.10.2004 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT P8: COPY OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 05.05.2010 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P (C) Nos. 33515 of 2004 and 30830 of 2005 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 31st day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT The issue involved in both these cases is closely interconnected with each other and hence dealt with together . 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner brought to the notice of this Court that, the issue concerned in these writ petitions has already been settled and a memo of compromise has been produced as Ext. P8 along with I.A. No. 6530 of 2010 in W.P.(C) No. 33515 of 2004. In the said circumstances, the writ petitions are disposed of, in terms of the compromise memo produced as Ext. P8 along with I.A. No. 6530 of 2010 in W.P. (C) No. 33515 of 2004, which shall form part of this judgment. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd