IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9246 of 2010 KUNDAN KUMAR CHOUDHARY Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 19.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. F.I.R. is clear enough that deceased was poisoned, if by her mother-in-law, father-in-law and brother-in-law (Deber) earlier also threatening was given on their behalf and earlier threatening is specified by attempt to resolve such differences and informant had assured his daughter to have talk whenever husband would come, meaning thereby that husband was working elsewhere of the State but after a month of the incident, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, due to some ulterior motive petitioner’s/husband’s name has been added and he is apprehending his arrest which is not justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 57 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Begusarai subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)