WPSS No. 606 of 2006 Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Udyog Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Shah, Standing Counsel for the State. Learned Standing Counsel for the State raised an objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy before the Public Service Tribunal, as such, the writ petition cannot be entertained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and the petitioner should have first approached to the Tribunal. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this court to withdraw the petition with liberty to seek the appropriate remedy before the appropriate court. Permission granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above liberty. However, the Tribunal while computing the period of limitation to entertain such petition to be filed by the petitioner before the Tribunal will exclude the time spent in prosecuting this writ petition in this court. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 11.09.2009 Shiv