IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.13/2008. IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1597/2000. Mangilal Verma Vs. S.S. Panwar Date of order : August 26, 2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Deepak Goyal for the petitioner. Shri Bhanwar Bagri for the respondent. **** BY THE COURT :- This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner raising grievance that he has not been paid even the minimum wages. His salary has not been revised from the date of his reinstatement i.e. 31/1/2000 despite specific directions of this Court to treat the petitioner as having been reinstated w.e.f. 31/1/2000 the date on which he was terminated. It was contended that award was modified by direcging reinstatement of the petitioner from 31/1/2000 but that does not mean that respodnents wuld not grant continuity to the petitioner for the above period. The direction of this Court was confined only for making payment to the petitioner from the date of award till his reinstatement and there was further direction that amount under Section 17B shall be liable to be reduced from such amount. Even if still petitioner has any grievance, he ought to have filed a fresh writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner has not so far been allowed to join. Learned counsel for respondents contested this submission of the petitioner by saying that petitioner was insisting for payment of regular salary and on his own, he is not joining the duties. Respondents are still prepared to allow him to join. In view of above, the contempt petition does not survive any further. Same is accordingly dismissed and the notices of contempt are hereby discharged. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil