IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6063 of 2007 Kiran Kumari alias Kiran Devi, Wife of Vishwanath Bhagat, Resident of Village Parsa Mahind, Police Station Sonebarsha, District Sitamarhi. -------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi. 5. The District Superintendent of Education, District Sitamarhi. 6. The Block Development Officer, Sonebarsha Block, District Sitamarhi. 7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Sonebarsha Blcok, District Sitmarhi. 8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchaayt Raj Bisunpur Gonani, Sonebarsha Block, District Sitamarhi. 9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Bisunpur Gonahi, Sonebarsha Block, District Sitamarhi. 10. Kiran Kumari, wife of Birendra Kumar, resident of Village Parsa Mahind, P.O. Haribela, P.S. Sonebarsha, District Sitamarhi. -------- Respondents ----------- 2 28.10.2010 The grievance of the petitioner with regard to the following relief:- “1(i) To quash the Annexure-„4‟ dated 28.3.2007 issued by the Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Bisunpur Gonahi, by which the respondent no.10 has been selected for appointment under Bihar Panchayat Primary Education (Employment and Service Condition) Rule, 2006 as untrained panchayat teacher (having lesser marks than the petitioner in the panel) and was directed to join in the Primary School Lohekhar Tole, Supaina. (ii) To command and direct the 2 respondents to issue appointment letter to the petitioner after conducting counseling as she possesses higher percentage of marks than the respondent no.10 in the panel and further to command and direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as untrained panchaayt teacher in respective school.” in the first instance has to be looked into by the District Teachers Appellate Authority. The petitioner has admittedly not moved the said appellate authority, which in the event of being moved by the petitioner, will decide the matter strictly in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as also respondent no.10. With the aforementioned observations, this application is disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)