IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.949 OF 2006 IN APPEAL (LDG.) NO.104 OF 2006 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3560 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO.70 OF 1999 Mrs.Godwin Lewis ....Appellant V/s. Robert John Quadros & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.K.B. Adyanthya for the Appellant. Mr.Anthony T. Marques for the Respondents. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2006. P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the Respondents. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay of 44 days. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bona-fide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)