1 wp 1634.2010.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION srk WRIT PETITION NO. 1634 OF 2010 Rajiv Kapildev Gupta & Ors. ..Petitioners. v/s. Rinki w/o Rajeev Gupta & Anr. ..Respondents. .... Ms. Seema Gupta i/b Ashok M. Saraogi for Petitioners. Mr. Rajesh Yadav for Respondent no.1. Mr. J.P. Kharge, A.P.P. for Respondent no.2/State. .... CORAM : V.M.KANADE, J. DATE : 22ND JULY, 2010. P.C. This Petition has been filed by the Petitioner for quashing the complaint filed by the Respondent no.1 who is the wife of the Petitioner no.1 for the offence punishable under section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Parties have filed Consent Terms. The Respondent no.1 was present in the court yesterday and she has no objection if the complaint is quashed. Consent terms are taken on record. They are marked “X” for the purpose of identification. Since the parties have settled the matter and the Respondent has no objection for quashing the said 2 wp 1634.2010.doc proceedings which she had initiated under section 12 of the said Act, the Petition is allowed in view of the ratio of the judgment in the case of B.S.Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another, reported in 2003(4) SCC 675. Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and it is disposed of. [ V.M.KANADE, J. ]