./"^"l^ '^" S!'{f '"'• •r t--%^ ^iSSS^ Eil I-HC-22 311^1 ^iT k'tt'h S^t sh^if^ •^T?^t ,-s A' ^. f 'S^f •<IWIclAI, g'ol'y'ie, (»ICTI+I^'(. 31T^LTRt^ ^c-K.^ i-'. ^.^^[L.^2'/08 tff*<Ml Wflffh fere^T' STI^I TOlIW^lft'ET HIGH COURT OF Coram: Hon'ble Honble WritPg JSHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR IShri Dhirendra Mishra, & [Shri R.N. Chandrakar, JJ (itionNo.1785 of 2008 Petitioner. vd Respondent (Writ Petition u Present: Shri Sheikh Niyamati|llah Sudhir Verma, Advocate. Shri Prashant Mishra,| Advocatefor tfie respondent. (Passed on Per Dhirendra Mishra. J. The petitioner has filecj ".10.1 This Honble writ in the nat produce entij Court. ^t'LlI<'l-41Tl 'RTR^ff ^ 'f^Sl' ^+$l< ^? 3lf:<n aii^r M/s. Mohd. Kasim, through partner Sheikh Niyamatuliah; s/o. Mohd. Kasim, r/o. Darri Road, Qrt. No. 173, Ward No.1, Ramsagarpara, Korb, T^hsi! & Distt. Korba (CG). National Thermal Power Cprporation Korba, through General Manager, National Thermal Power Corporation, KorbaDistt.Korba(CG). der Article 226 of the Constitution of India) llah, petitioner in persons along with Shri Sr. Advocate with Shri Varunendra Mishra, ttiis Orat Order is 24th dayofApril.2009) the instant petition for following reliefs: ;ourt may kindly be pleased to issue a ure of cerforari, direct the respondent to •e records for kind perusal of Horlble [Tft^ ^fe^ ^s^. Z ~F % XI-HC-22 's^? •<ii<iici<i, aril^'is, Riwi+iy 3TT^?r ~V3[^ , CoPCO^o-l^t^ g^^.....................................^^ ^^ 'ifnr sfiweR -g^/200 g- i^^s' sn^i^r K;-)i.<* anjsr ^ffqi •(•rf^cT H Pl M thl hi -w. al sn^r TCirar ^rftg 10.2 Further issue an appropria1| the decision of respojndent banned/black listed to the 10.3 Further issue appropriate NTPCto pay Rs. fifteen cr fell down ofgood wifl of th< action of respondent NTPC| Idirection to the respondent pres to the petitioner firm for petitioner firm due to illegal 10.4. Further direct to pay Rs. 2005 till final adjudication loss of income. 10.5. Further direct the respond< petitioner for not granting offer ofthe petitioner is low wever, subsequently, the reliefe claimj leted vide orderdated 15-1-2009. The petitioner is aggrieved by the o|f-der dated 24-1-2007 (Annexure i^s decided that they shall not cc<nsider to issue tender enquiry for a perjod of two years with effect from ) whereby the respondent NTPC h^ 6^-2006. Shri Prashant Mishra, learned Sr. fshra, Advocateappearing on behatf ofl NTPC/respondent submite that period for which the petitioner was r|ot to be issuedtender enquiry, s already expired on 06-06-2008. Th|ereafter, the respondents have eady commenced issuing tender enqitiry to the petitioner. He further ^Tiiifer-ift'i ^i+icfi' T? t^i' ifaf^K' ^;<flfwT3ii^r ^L-. ' )e writ by which kindly quash NTPC by which (etitioner firm. PO lacs per year from May |>f the petition in the head of ^nt to pay Rs.30,000/- to the tender work in 2005 whife test one". ed against 10. 3 to 10.5 were Advocate with Shri Varunendra r^^a^ Cgn^ ---S -HC-22 'ite»...5^ ,-rf' ^^S-'^^rf^" T"T •<INI(I<I, ©•ai'y'is,fsioi'yy an^T 'q^ra? upGc') ^Q- I^J?'?/ ••^ 200 ^- *<i*«tTai^tiich fa'b'iff' sn^t^i (<•<['* sn^r ?ti<Hich •Mf?tT Raju si^bmits that as and when the tender enc|uiries are made fot subsequent cdntract work, the same shatl be issued crIteria and norms of frie NTPC in future th SII^I ?:RII8]IT'Hf?? eljgible, the work shall be allotted to the p In view of the aforesaid submissii respondent, Shri Sudhir Verma, lea p^titioner does notwantto press this petitijon. Accordingly, this petition is dismiss^d as not pressed. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge -w. % <:M<f[<n'i?li 14M^ff tf f^^ Tf^R^R ^3lf:<naii^r |o the petitioner as per eligibility |nd where the petitioner is found t'rtioner also. n made by learned counsel for ned counsel appearing for the Sd/- R.N.Chandrakar Judge [^^fig^