^^ft' 3" !.-»,,...». 'tsi^.ii.^::' l;i^-::^^^^ asj.ti^wrs c?^/ £TO W THE mOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^5 2 ^- /2006 WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER °.-' 0^ ^.-"'"y?^ p,?*' ^:'-1 [M'ly^^" ^i^ ..-•' c¥y'/5?''' ^'"^ ..-•'" <»• SI'1'A-L. R^PONDENTS ^d^ ??'^^ ^l/ <^" ^ 2. .3. -'Jagannath Ram aged about 37 years, son of Shri Lallu Ram, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Tribal Primary School Mudhi, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) (SL.NO. 02 ofAnnexure P-1) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Assistant Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) The Block Education officer, Block Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER As per cause title. HI6H COURT OF CHHATrtSfiARH ^tT MLASPUR W. P. (s) No. 7SOO of 2006 Petitioher ; Pbnch Rum Nwrang Versus Respondents ; Storte of Chhattisgarh ond arwther w. P. ts) No reoi <rf 2006 Pethioner : Jugal Ram Chakresh Versus Respondents : StcrteofChhutttogarhandonolher W. P. fal No. 7502 nf 2006 Petitkmer : Jagdijh a»androYadiw Versus Respondents : State of ChhattiSjWrh and onother W. P. falNa. 7B03irf2006 PetH'ioner : t)ici Soi Pttikra Versus Respondents : Storte of ChhattisBarh ond ono+her W. I*. (s) NB. 7B04 af 2006 PetHioner : Nonelteahwar Ram Bwgat Versus Respondents : Storte of Chhtrtti^arh and anoltier W. P. fal No.rem af 2006 Petitioner ; 5ametalKhurrte Versus Respondents : Stnte of Chhuttisoarh ond onolher w. p. (si NB. reosBf a»& Petitioner : Smt. Philomnw Kindo Versus Respondents ; Storte of Chhatfisaarh ond uw-ther W. P. faVNn 7309 <rf 2006 Petitwner : Shyum Sunder Yadw ReqwndentS ver9a StnteofChhattiaiarhandlonoAer ^) W. P. fa) No 7S10 af 2006 Petitioner : Hiloriyus Kujur Versus , tespondents : Stateof ChhattisBarh ond o-thers W. P. fal Na 7B11 rf 2006 Petitioner : Mu. Rajkumari Dahariya Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and olhers W P. fslNa 7812 <rf 2006 Petitkwier : Rang Vallabh Sidar Versus Respondents : Stcrte of Chhattisnarhond onother W. P.falNn 7B13<rfaM6 Petitioner : Romdular KBshkar Versus Respondents : Stnte of Chhattisowh ond olhers W. P. fal Na. 7B14 nf 2006 Petitioner : Pmdyumn Kumar Versus Respondents : State of Chhnttfaaarh ond olheris W. P. falNo 7516 af 200k Petitioner : Smt. Lulajhiya MinJ Versus Respondents : Storte of Chhattisgarh ond molhcr W. P. falNo. reiA<rf200& Petitioner : Timo'thiyus Toppo Versus (tespondents : State of Chhotttegurh and others W. P. ts) No. 7B17 af 20Q6 Petitiwier : AmritKuinar Versus : StateofChhattisairiiandolhers Reswndents W. P. fal Nn 7B18<rfMO& Petitioner :. OularEkkn Vwsus Respaidents : State of ChhatMsoarh ond c-thers W. P. fri Na. 7B19<rf 200& Petitioner ; Alfrad Kujur Versus Reapondents : Statc of Chhattisoarh and anolher W. P. tst Nn 7B21 rf 200& Petitioner : Probhu Sai Tfa-ky Versus Reapondents : S*nte of ChhattisBarhand olhers W. P. fal NB. Petitioner : JagannarthRom Versus Respondents : 5tnte of Chhattisgarh cnd olhers W. P. (s) N» 7SZ3 <rf 200& Ptetitioner : Atahiar Sai Plaikra Versua Respondents : Stnrte of Chhattisanrh ond oAers W. P.falNB.7S24<rfai06 Petitioner : Smt. RebckaMmj Versus Respondents : Stcrte of Oihtrttiagurh <md olhers W. P. fslNo. 7B2S af 20Q& Petitioner : AJit Kumar Tirky yersus Respondwrts : Storte of Chhattisourh dnddnolher And ^ P fdMn 7K6rf 2006 Retitioner ; Rankumar Banjare Resnondents vw«us State of Chhottisdnrh end<n<rther SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Sattsh K. Agnihotri. J Msr. AM. Bhakta, Advoca-te for the petitwners. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy fiovemment Advocartie for the re^pondents/Stnte. OR&ER (passed on 91fl doy of January, 2007) 1. Leomed counsel appearing for Itie petitioners as well as leumed Deputy 6ovemni«art' Advocofte appcarmg for the reapondenta/Stntc jomtly submit -thot Ihe farts of -the present cose are simt'lcB' to thut of in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tnwri A olhers Vs. Slute 6Bvt. of Chh<rttis9arh & o-thers). u*>wh was allowed vide order tfated 7*^ November, 2006. Thty further aubmit Iho* -the question of law iriwlwd is also Ihe some. 2. In view of the above storted submisswns madB by teamed counsel for the parties, Ihese •wit petitions qre altowed 'm tBrms of -the order dated 71h November, 2006 passed by this Court in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of Ihis order be placed on record fci other connected wit petitions. &ibhash Sd/- Sarish K. Ag Judge