IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17075 of 2010 MD.MUSTAQUEEM @ BHUNA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 30-06-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Nobody appears on behalf of the state. Petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in a case instituted under Sections 395/412 IPC, in view of the liberty so granted to him vide order dated 21-07- 2009 passed in Cr. Misc. NO. 22385/2009(Annexure-1). It is contended that mobile phone allegedly recovered from the possession of the petitioner has not been put on T.I.P. It is next contended that petitioner is in custody since 6.3.2009. Considering the aforesaid circumstances as also keeping in view the liberty so granted to him by this court, I am now inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. III, Araria in connection with S.T. Case NO. 285 of 2010 arising out of Araria P.S.Case No. 33 of 2009 subject to the conditions that (i) one of the bailors 2 shall be his own close family members; (ii) the petitioner shall appear in person on the date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates the trial court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law. Sujit (Kishore K.Mandal,J)