1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 738 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 738 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 738 OF 2008 KAKDA IMPEX (I) Pvt.Ltd,. & Anr. .. Petitioners. vs. Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. S.P. Bharti for the Petitioners. Mr. A.S. Rao with Ms. Hina Shah for Respondents. CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & SANTOSH BORA, JJ. SANTOSH BORA, JJ. SANTOSH BORA, JJ. DATE: 24TH APRIL, 2008. DATE: 24TH APRIL, 2008. DATE: 24TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners and we have perused our earlier order dated 1.12.2006 whereby the petition was dismissed and particularly the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners had undertaken that the petitioners be permitted to deposit an amount of Rs. 75 lakhs by the end of December, 2006. The learned counsel for the Petitioners fairly concedes that the said amount of Rs. 75 lakhs has not been deposited till date. In light of the same, we do 2 not find anything wrong in the impugned order of the Tribunal in dismissing the above appeal for non-deposit. There is no error or illegality in the said order. 2. Now the learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks to contend that since the Petitioners had a credit balance of Rs. 75 lakhs with the Respondents it should not been allowed to be deposited. If that be so, the Petitioners ought to have approached this Court. We do not find any case made out for interfering with the order of dismissal passed by the Tribunal. The petition stands dismissed. (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (SANTOSH BORA, J.) (SANTOSH BORA, J.) (SANTOSH BORA, J.)