IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21000 of 2010 MOHAMMAD ZUNNUN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 04 15.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned counsel for complainant as well as learned P.P. for the State. Admittedly, petitioner is husband of the complainant. It appears from perusal of impugned order of the learned Sessions Judge that at the time of hearing of bail petition complainant as well as petitioner were ready to lead their conjugal life. Furthermore, it appears that the learned Sessions Judge directed the petitioner to surrender before the court below with compromise petition and seek regular bail. In this case, learned counsel for both parties submitted that both parties are ready to lead their conjugal life. In the aforesaid circumstance, petitioner, namely, Mohammad Zunnun, in the event of his arrest/surrender within thirty days from the date of communication of this order to learned S.D.J.M, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 490 of 2008, shall be released on bail provisionally for two months on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M, Sherghati, Gaya subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Furthermore, if petitioner surrenders before the court below in the manner as stated above, the learned court below shall 2 issue a notice to the complainat as well as petitioner fixing a date for reconciliation and furthermore the learned court below shall take effective steps for patching up the dispute of the parties and if he succeeds in his attempt then in that event, the learned court below shall confirm the provisional bail of the petitioner. But if the learned court below fails in his attempt and finds any non- Cooperation on behalf of the petitioner, in that situation, the learned court below shall not extend the provisional bail of the petitioner. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)