IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER 20.10.2008. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.134/2008 Ramavatar Meena Vs. ADJ No.6,Jaipur Diustrict & Ors. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Shri M.M. Ranjan, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. I have perused the impugned order. Both the courts below while considering the case of the petitioner for the grant of temporary injunction have categorically held that the plaintiff petitioner has failed to prove his prima facie possession over the property in dispute and in that view of the matter when the plaintiff has failed to prove his possession over the land in dispute hence the learned courts below have dismissed the prayer for the grant of the temporary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the possession of the plaintiff. Considering the facts which have come on record I find that the courts below have not committed any jurisdictional error so as to call for any interference in the writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS