IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33838 of 2008 SANJEET KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Sucheta Yadav Advocate for the State : Mis. Pushpa Sinha, APP 2 18.08.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made an accused under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner in the First Information Report is that he has fired causing injury upon two labourers of the informant namely, Manoj Kumar and Arvind Kumar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the injury report with regard to the aforesaid Manoj Kumar and Arvind Kumar does not support the allegations made in the First Information Report. The injuries have been brought on record as Annexure – 2 series. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the injury report the injuries of Arvind Kumar as well as Manoj Kumar are simple in nature and caused by hard and blunt substance and not by firearm. Learned counsel for the State submits that there is allegation of shooting upon the petitioner causing injury to the two labourers of the informant and uncle of the informant. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the petitioner, namely, Sanjeet Kumar to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 79 of 2008, District – Nalanda at Biharsarif. Kundan (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)