~sc ^fft^l IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. / 2007 PETITIONER ..•••' ft'-^y ^'' >."'•••'' l^" ' .^^ ^" ^ RESPONDENTS :Champa Bai Meher W/o Sanat Kumar Aged about 32 years R/o Gram- Ghota, P.0.- Ghota, Tehsil- Dhamdha, Dist- Durg (C.G) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Women & Child Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur / ^ ^ ^ r^ '^4. Collector Dhamdha, Dist- Durg (C.G) District Women & Child Development Officer Collectorate, Dhamdha, Dist- Durg (C.G) Project Officer (Women & Child Devlopment) Integrated Child Development project, Dhamdha, Dist- Durg (C.G) 5. Smt. Saraswati Bai W/o Suresh R/o- Village Ghota, Tehsil- Dhamdha Dist- Durg (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT ORDER OF DIRECTION- TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. •^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WritPetition_Ls)J<o^834 of 2007 ^ Petitioner Versus CIiaiapa Bai Meher Respoadents State ofChhattisgarh & others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satlsli K. Affiihotri, J Shri H, S, Ahluwalia, Advocate for thc pctitioncr. Miss DeepaU Pandey, Pandel Lawyer for the respondents No. 1 to 4. T- rfwr ORDER (Passed on this 20A day fif Fehmary, 2007) 5y this petition, fhe petitioner chaUenges the validity offhe selection of the respondeat No. 5 for appointment on the post of Aanganwadi Sahayika (Assistant) at vfflage Gfaota, District - Durg on the groiiad that fhe p^titioner belongs to the family living below the poverty !uie whereas fhe respondent No. 5 belongs to fhe famfly livmg above the povert}' line, therefoie the selection ofthe rcspoiident No.5 is contrary to the cuf-ular of the State Govemnient dated 6.1.2006 and 10.4.2006. 1 Leanied counsel for ftie petitioner submits that the petitioner has prefercntial right to the selection and appointinent as Auganbadi Sahayika ui AngEinbadi Centre Ghofa, District- Durg. lu view of the above, without expressing any opinion on facts aa weU on merit, the CoHector, Durg is directed to look into the aUegation inade by the petitioner and pass appropriate onler in accordance with and law. 'he writ petition is accordingfy disposed of. No oider as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge