IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21229 of 2011 Sudhir Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 22.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Although petitioner is named in the first information report but admittedly, informant is not eye witness of the alleged occurrence and there was enmity between informant and other FIR named accused persons. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that after investigation police submitted final form in respect of other co- accused whereas charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. The impugned order of the learned Sessions Judge does not reflect any specific overt-act against the petitioner It has been pleaded at para 8 of the petition that the only material, which has come against the petitioner in course of investigation is that he was seen in the village of the deceased on the alleged date of the occurrence and explanation of the petitioner is that he had gone to attend shradh ceremony of his relative. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Sudhir Kumar, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in Ghosi P.S. Case no. 249/2009. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)