IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8295 of 2011 Gayatri Upadhaya, Wife of Late Umakant Upadhaya, resident of Village-Kotwa Bajar, P.S. -Kotwa, District-East Champaran. . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, East Champaran (Motihari). 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Motihari. 4. The Block Development Officer, Kotwa, East Champaran. 5. The Officer-in-Charge, Kotwa Police Station. 6. Sri Chandesh Prasad, son of Sri Kapildeo Prasad, resident of Village- Kalayanpurkhas, P.S.-Kotwa, District-East Champaran. 7. Sri Manoj Kumar, Son of Sri Yogendra Yadav, resident of Village- Betiah Basant, P.S.-Kesariya, District-East Champaran, Garaul, Distt- Vaishali. . . . . . . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 02.12.2011 The petitioner is the landlord and is aggrieved by order of Sub-divisional Officer, (Sadar) Motihari dated 04.01.2011, whereby he has directed for removal of locks put by her on the tenanted premises. The petitioner moved this Court in C.W.J.C. No.5182 of 2011, which was dismissed with the observation that if the petitioner approaches the Sub-divisional Officer, with all relevant materials as discussed to satisfy her lawful possession and locking of the premises, the latter would hear both the parties and arrive at a reasoned conclusion with regard to his/her own jurisdiction or the lack of the same. It appears that the petitioner instead of moving before Sub-divisional Officer (Sadar), Motihari has again filed this writ application. In my view, the petitioner should first comply with the observation of this Court to move the Sub-divisional Officer, with all relevant materials and documents and the Sub-divisional 2 Officer without prejudice would hear both the parties afresh and pass order in accordance with law. With the aforesaid liberty, this application is disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)