IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43716 of 2009 CHULHA DEVI Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2/ 22.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. I find much foul on the informant’s part. Petitioner’s husband died. According to the learned counsel killed and she remained engaged in some negotiation to get marry with younger brother of the deceased which could not be finalized. What force her to file this case after more than two months of death of her husband is that in laws family members refused to maintain her and give share in family members though demand is shown everywhere behind the incident and not giving share. It appears only skill as the case is lodged basing complaint which was sent to the Police by A.C.J.M., Naugachiya. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Naugachhiya P.S. Case No. 96 of 2009 arising out of Complaint Case NO. 313 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Naugachhiya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)