IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 883 of 2009() ---------------------------- CRIME NO.1054/2005 OF CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN BA.513/2009 Dated 10/02/2009 CP.13/2007 of J.M.F.C.-II, ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER/ IST ACCUSED ------------------------------------------- KRISHNADAS, AGED 48 YRS,S/O.PADMANABHAN, KODUNGARA HOUSE, KOTTEKAD, VENOLY, KALIPARA, MALAMPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.P.A.MUJEEB RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT ----------------------------------------------------------- THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,CENTRAL POLICE STATION,ERNAKULAM REP; BY P.PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.S.U.NAZAR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. =============================== Bail Application No.883 of 2009 =============================== DATED: 26.02.2009 ORDER Petitioner who is the 1st accused in Crime No.1054/2005 of Central Police Station, Ernakulam for offences punishable under Sections 365 and 395 IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on.28.08.05. The petitioner was arrested on 13.01.09. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the offences, the nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the relatively short duration of the judicial custody undergone by the petitioner, the present stage of investigation and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am satisfied that if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) sj