THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.6029 of 2009 Date: 13.08.2009 Between: Tadi Satyanarayana Reddy ..Petitioner and State of Andhra Pradesh. ..Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.6029 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner, who is accused No.1 in Crime No.165 of 2009 of Tadepalligudem Town Police Station, Eluru, West Godavari District, registered for the offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 341 and 506 (ii) read with Section 34 I.P.C., apprehends arrest. 2. This is second anticipatory bail application. The first bail application filed by the petitioner ended in dismissal on 18.06.2009, vide Crl.P.No.3845 of 2009. 3. Heard Sri C. Padmanabha Reddy, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused No.1, and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State. 4. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner/accused No.1 submits that in the earlier bail application the fact that the defacto complainant herself filed O.P. seeking divorce was not brought to the notice of this Court. Had the fact of filing the divorce O.P. was brought to the notice of the Court in the earlier bail application, the result of that petition may have been otherwise. A further submission has been made by the learned counsel that the police completed the investigation and filed charge sheet. 5. It appears the defacto complainant presented a complaint before the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tadepalligudem on 12.03.2009, which came to be forwarded to the Tadepalligudem Taluk P.S. under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., and thereafter she filed O.P.No.36 of 2009 on 21.04.2009 seeking for dissolution of marriage. In the complaint presented by the defacto complainant, she has narrated the instances of harassment and in the latest incident occurred on 13.01.2009, the petitioner, who has been arrayed as accused No.1, locked her in a room and participated intercourse with a maidservant. 6. In the above circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/accused No.1. However, since the charge sheet has been filed, the petitioner/accused No.1 is at liberty to surrender before the Court concerned and move an application for regular bail, in which event, the Court concerned has to dispose of said application as expeditiously as possible preferably on the same day. 6. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed with the above observations. ________________________ B. SESHASAYANA REDDY, J Date: 13.08.2009 GHN