IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.42 of 2009 PRITHVI CHAND CHOUDHARY, son of Late Phenilal Choudhary, Resident of Village- Hulash, P.S. Raghopur, District Supaul............... Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation, Water Resources Department,Govt. of Bihar,Patna..... Respondents. 2 22-4-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This review petition has been filed for review of order dated 1-12-2008 by which the writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 1616 of 2007 was dismissed on merits. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while arguing the writ petition the real issues were not placed for consideration and there was a mistake in prayer portion as well as in paragraph-1 of the writ petition in confining the relief against the earlier appellate order dated 23-8-2004 ( Annexure-14) whereas the appellate order under challenge was annexed as annexure-17 dated 26- 10-2006. On a complete reading of paragraph-1 of the writ petition and the final order dated 1-12-2008 this Court finds that the writ petition was considered on merits after noticing that Annexure-14 was set aside by an order of this Court dated 8-8-2006 and the matter was finally decided by the appellate authority on merits after the order of remand by this Court. Having considered the writ petition and - 2 - Naresh dismissed the same on merits, it is not possible to review the order on the ground that some relevant issues were not placed before the Court. Review jurisdiction is a limited jurisdiction for correcting errors apparent on the face of the record. In the facts and circumstances it is not possible to interfere with the final order passed by this Court on 1- 12-2008. The review petition is therefore dismissed. ( Shiva Kirti Singh,J)