IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39105 of 2008 MURARI SANTHALIA @ MURARI PRASAD SANTHALIA S/o – late Mahavir Pd. Santhalia, Resident of village Naya Bazar, Lakhisarai, P.S. and District – Lakhisarai. ---------- Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR -------- Opp. Party. ----------- 2 16.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. Petitioner is in custody since 08.07.2008, in connection with Lakhisarai (Kabaiya) P.S. Case No. 168 of 2008 for offence under sections 465, 468 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The First Information Report has been lodged on the basis of the report of Marketing Officer stating therein that the detergent powder is manufactured by the petitioner carries level of being manufactured in the name of Rohtak Haryana Manufacturer, not only this based on his misrepresentation, the petitioner is supposed to be charging higher rate from the customers. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no complaint of any kind as such made by any actual consumer or customer in this regard. The allegation is figment in the imagination of the marketing officer and in so far as the offences are concerned they are not made out as such. There seems to be some force in the submission made by - 2 - the petitioner in this regard specially keeping in mind that the petitioner has been charged under the substantive offence of the Indian Penal Code. In view of the above and also that the petitioner is in custody for a while, let the petitioner namely, murari Santhalia @ Murari Prasad Santhalia, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Lakhisarai (Kabaiya) P.S. Case No. 168 of 2008. Rajeev/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)