IN THE zgwm kf ”W wax/0 HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISHGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. WP (S)N .......... 2011 PETITIONERS /1. /(1) J2) Bhoorik Ram Sahu, S/o Late Shri Ledhoo Ram Sahu ,Aged 58 Years, U,D.T., Govt. Middle School, Baghera, Distt. Durg C.G. . Suraj Rai Verma, S/o Late Shri Nohar Singh Verma, Aged 56 Years, Head—Master, Govt. Middle School, Shriya, Distt. Durg C.G. VERSUS The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through — The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Off1cer, Durg C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FORISSUANCE OF WRIT OR ¢MI&.’ MANDAMUS/DIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. x/ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1551 of2011 PETI’I‘IONERS : Bhoorik Ram Sahu & Another. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State Govt, of Chhattisgarh & Another. WRIT PE’I‘H’ION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotl'i, J. Eresent: ‘ §hri Somkant Verma. Advocate for the petitioner. ‘ Shri Satish Gupta, Government Advocate for the State/ respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 22“ day of March, 201 l) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation in the light of circular dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P/5), passed by the Government of Chhattisgarh, School Education Department. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no obj ection. 3. No permission of this Court is required to make representation to the respondent authorities. Thus, such direction cannot be issued. However, ifthe petitioners make a representation to the respondent authorities, the same may be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits and perspective. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNIHORI Judge Amit aw