IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2008 / 14TH CHAITHRA 1930 OP.No. 7386 of 2001(D) ---------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- K.B.SUMODH, S/o. BALAN K.V., AIYNI KUNNATH HOUSE, P.O, OTTUKARA, KRISHNAPURAM. THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.R.SUNIL RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY THAHASILDAR (R.R.), THRISSUR. 3. THE ADDITIONAL REGISTERING AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. 4. M/S. OVERSEAS SANMAR FINANCIAL LIMITED, ROHININ BUILDINGS, 2ND FLOOR, NEAR MATHRUBHUMI, THRISSUR. BY THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/04/2008 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P.No.7386/2001 2 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE DATED 2/11/2000 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.11.2000 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN O.P.No.32946 OF 200. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SEND BY THE PETITIONER DATED 24.2.2001. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE REGISTERED LAWYER NOTICE DATED 31.7.2003. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD DATED 8.8.2003. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT NO.177/1998 DATED 12.1.1998 FILED BEFORE THE XXXIII METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT, SAIDAPET, CHENNAI-15. TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J ==================== O.P.No.7386 of 2001 ======================== Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2008 JUDGMENT The main relief sought for in the writ petition is for a direction to the third respondent to comply with the directions in Ext.P2. The petitioner was the registered owner of a Goods vehicle bearing registration No.KL/8H/990. The petitioner filed 'G' form for Tax exemption for the period from 1.12.1997 to 3.12.1997. As per Ext.P2 judgment, this Court directed the third respondent to dispose of Ext.P3 as early as possible with notice to the concerned parties. 2. The learned Government Pleader brought to my notice an order passed by the Regional Transport Officer, Trissur, dated 26.6.2003, whereby the representation of the petitioner was rejected. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested for an opportunity to challenge the said order before the Deputy Transport Commissioner. With liberty to do so, the writ petition is closed. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,JUDGE dvs