^^f^^ / J / IN THB HIGH COUJR'I' OF CHHATnSOARH : BILASPUR W.PJMo, 1601 pf 2004 Petitioners 1. The State of C.titiattisgarh, through : the CoUector, District Jaajgir-Chainpa (CG) 2. The Janpad Pauchayat, Sakti, through : The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Paaachayat, Sakti, District Janjgir Chaiupa (C.G.) Versus Respondejite 1. Siut Unaadevi Thiakre, wife of Late Baburao Thalire. 2. Amrit Rao Thakre, aged about 50 years, son of Shri Baburao Thakre. 3. Ku. Hemlata, aged about 44 years, daughter of Shri Baburao Thakre. 4. Kumari Lata, aged about 35 years, daughter of Babnrao Thakre. 5. Sint. Neena Gayakwad, aged about 41 years, daughter of Baburao Tfaakre and wife of Shri Dilip Gayakwad. AU are resideuce of Sarkanda, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). WRIT PETITION UNDER ART1CLE 226/227 OP THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'bte Shri Satisfa K. Agmhotri J.) Shri M. P. S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the petitioners/State. S.bri Gurudeo Sharau, Advocate tbr tfae respondents. O K. IDt, E» (Passed on this 13th Day (rfFebruaiy, 2009) 1, Leamed Pirst Civil Judge, Class-I, Bitespur passed a decree iu Civil Suit No. 75-A/1980 ou 28th August, 1986, m favour of Babu Rao Thakre. The respondents No. 1 to 5 are tegal heirs of Babu Kao Thalcre. Learaed Civil Judge passed the decree, diTecttng as uader:- "q? ytf^rt l^-'ir uirar t f^? w^ f^rrai 16.7.51 ^t 45^-50-2-60 W?—2-80^ 4tl'l*)l-1 IR Pl^Rri d4<l«T) pl'llltlK ^W 4 x4 %'t ^ arreR w irre f?rftr 12.2.66 ^ (ft-r q4 ^ waifTi 12.2.63 ^ fSraffttr <)ti-i*)i-i w ^a-T ^g »R^ w^ a>r artewrit t i iiRt^r^t vw i ^. ^i.^rra'r W ssf^'v l^qr unar f fe q? qNt wr dy'ft'w ^a-tiii ^ WETR TR ^R PrerfftxT ^ ?TW fWq> 12.2.63 ^ WreT f^lpt;"B wfip t{R<i»«f q>r yraM qr^ ^t (IN *fre ^ ^ ! ^s srtsfr ^T \. uinft ^ f^ WCT ^-i »lNt<*>4t|lfl <^ 'fFT 1866 ^ pTte ^a ^R 'pf 3K vfVl.VWS SRT ?ftir +1441A ^t uff .S-f qNt ^ ^TT'T WT ^•fpiyi^ui f^qr ufr ^i; R-II«(> 12.2.63 ^ ^FWI t.;R<«f ^T yreT-r (ft.r *n? 4 l^ir uti4'ii i yn m? q?r w^if qftara irRi«t<0 <t>*ii* 1 q?-r ^trr l arPmn^ ^T TiRare g*)ifi>iri st^ IR '^t ^ aTS^R ^t^tT ?hTT !° 0> 2. The petitioners/State has lailed to coiaply wifh the decree, accorduigty, execution proceedmg was filed by the respoadeute. The petitioncrs/judgment-debtors ffled repfy on 27.9.2003, stating that no amount is due to be paid to the respondents/ decree-holders. Thereatter, ffae respoudents/decree-holders filed reply statmg that a suin of Rs. 3,15,237/- is diie for recovery. The Executmg Court by impugned order dated 4.3.2004 (Aunexure P/7) directed for payment ofa sum ofRs. 3,15,237/-. 3 . The petitioners/State raised a ground before the executing court, questioniug the amount, sayiug that the decree shouM be executed only in terms of the calculatiou niade by the Stete. Leamed couasel submits that the calculation inade by the Statc is ia accordance with fhc decree aad after depositing fhe ainount to fh.e tune ofRs. 21,151/- nothing inorc is due. 4. Per contra, leamed counsel appearing fbr tlie respendents submits that the catculation made by the petitioneis/State is aot correct and fhe outstaading auiouut, as on 4.3.2004 was Rs. 3^15,237/-. 5 . Be that as it laay, siuce the decree is passed by the Civil Judge, and the Executuig Court proceeded wltti thc execution aad detenniaed the anioiint after bawtug considered tlic accounts submitted by both the parties. This Court m the wrirjurisdiGtioa is not supposed to decide the amount. BffBBBHBpwm ^) I have heard leanied coiinsel appearing tbr the parties, perused fhe pleadings and documents appended theieto. I have found no irregiilarity iu the impugned order, which is in aocordance witti law and has been passed after bearing aad consideriag tbc cases of both the parties. The uupugiied order is unexceptionable aud does not wan-ant any iuterterence. In view of tbe foregoing, this petition stands disnussed. The Executing Court shall take steps to ensure conapliaace of the judgiuent aud decree in accordaace with law. The interim order dated 1.7.2004 is vacated. ConsequenUy, M(W)P No. 1428/2004 staads disposed of. No order as to costs. Thalan Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge