1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.231 OF 2009 Chunilal Prabhudas & Co. (Bombay) Pvt.Ltd. .. Plaintiffs Versus V.Ganesan .. Defendant Mr.Ganesh Shetty for plaintiffs. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 18th September 2009. P.C.: 1] It is stated that the writ of summons has been duly served. The instant suit is filed as a summary suit on the basis of written contract as evidenced by the invoice and delivery challans. Goods have been sold, supplied and delivered. Even the lorry receipts are annexed. Leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent has been obtained because despatch has taken place outside the jurisdiction of this Court. Similarly, the defendants are carrying on business in the State of Tamil Nadu. However, it is stated that the transaction was subject to Mumbai jurisdiction and the payment was to be made for the invoices at Mumbai. 2 It is stated that the goods have been duly received and, there is no dispute raised with regard to their quality or quantity. There is no reply to the Advocate’s notice although the same is duly received. In these circumstances, it is urged that the claim is not disputed or denied. 2] Having satisfied myself that this Court has jurisdiction to entertain and try this suit that the suit claim is within limitation and that it is maintainable under Order XXXVII of the C.P.C., I take the original documents along with list on file and the same are marked “X” for identification. 3] In the circumstances, there will be decree as prayed. Advocates’ cost and refund of court fees as per rules. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)