In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Misc. No.M-32207 of 2010 ..... Date of decision:30.11.2010 Jitender .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana .....Respondent .... Present: Mr. Anand Kumar Bishnoi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.C. Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondent-State. ..... S.S. Saron, J. On the last of date of hearing, the petitioner had taken time to show that he is a student. He is unable to show that he is a student. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In the incident that occurred on 26.9.2010, the petitioner is said to be armed with a knife and inflicted a knife blow on the ankle of the left foot of the complainant Vivek Bhardwaj. Om was armed with iron rod with which he hit on the waist of the complainant. Pawan was armed with country made pistol and he fired. Shishpal was armed with a Danda and he also hit the complainant on his waist on account of which he fell down and Om snatched a gold chain from his neck and Shishpal forcibly took `2,000/- from his pocket. The complainant then raised a noise and Niraj son of Prem Pal Thakur came to rescue him otherwise the accused would have beaten him more. The case is one of inflicting injuries and committing robbery Cr. Misc. No.M-32207 of 2010 [2] even though the FIR is not for robbery. Besides, learned counsel for the State has stated that the petitioner is involved in two other cases i.e. FIR No.42 dated 3.2.2009 registered at Police Station City, Palwal for the offence under Section 160 IPC and FIR No.215 dated 17.6.2009 for the offence under Section 61 of the Excise Act registered at Police Station City, Palwal. In the circumstances, no ground for grant of pre-arrest bail is made out. The criminal miscellaneous petition is accordingly dismissed. November 30, 2010. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp*