fr INTHEHIGH^OURT QF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fE s;- llftiiti WRJTPETITIONNO. 3678 /2003 PETmONER Dr. Vinod Kumar Crupta, S/o Shri R.S.Gupta, aged 40 yeais, Occupation- Service (presently posted as Ayurveda Medical OfHcerin (roveniment Ayurvedic Dispensary, Jashpumagar), R/o Sanna Road, Jashpurnagar (C.G.) -VERSUS- RESPONDENTS ?> ^sy'' ^0'^^^' ^" ..-• •?**' ..•••' 1. State of Chliattisgarh through Seeretary, Department ofHealth and Medical Education, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Dspartment oflndian Systsm ofMedicine aad Homeopathy, Old Nurses Hostel, Near Secretariat, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Collector,Jashpur(C.fl.) 4. Sui^gntendent-cum-District Ayuhreda OfGcer, Jashpumagar (C.G.). ^^A •- y WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 22^327 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FORISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT. ORDERS OR DIRECTION. XI-HC-22 aii^r'^i h'U'h 3}1§?( stiH Wia ."s.!, li:i;"k J'!;p;" <.T5cr ^|A|ld*<, riTfl'M'l'B, (sKII'My *11*1?IT shtllcb....uJ).C?......?..9o.- v x^ra? < ^ ^•^^» fq^^T' sii^r'^RnwHfStf 19-12-2003 Sbri Indrnsen Sahu, cotmsel for the petl'Moner. Shri RcuAir Singh, Gv^: Adwcate tntes notice for respotident No.l. By this petrMon fUed ujider Artictes 226/227 of the Constfhrtion of India, the petitienw nsspondent/State by not relhjvlng hlm to joln ttie State rf M.P. as he has been allocated to the Starfe of M.P. uwler the M.P. Re-argontMtiw Act. 2000. The petitioner is iiK»tldng as Ayuwed Medtcal Officer and prcscn'My posted at Jathpur. the Union »fIndia vide wderi ^grnwal hns been sent to rte the wife of the petitioncr The petitioner had ghwi^ crl1LtId<4lr1 TTTTRTf ^ 'f^^t' if^^K ^7 SlPaH 3i]^I is ehatlenging the action of •Hie IN pursuancc fe •Hie prwrisions uf M.P. Re-r'esanization Act, 2000 f(e petittoners' servtees t»ere allocated t» the State of M.P. The tenta^e ftaal allocati<m list was eonflnned by 'a1»<l 9-9-2002 cilM the SWtv of M.P. issued an <»rderNo.F-3-S44»2/ah,Sh.y%S/2dotod30-10-2a)2 ond posted the petltioner at Pa»(«»adi,(>is1rietSh^japur and one Ramesh jState af C.6.. in ptoceof the petitloner. The petitiotier apted for the ^tn'hi of M.P. Aie •h> hisfamily pniblems, is posted in bislricl- Udnmsjnghncgw (UttranchaO and due *<> rte pe^itioner's postmg in the runote distriefaf the State of C.6. the petition^r is compelled tu Ihw separately fnwi his fcnnily. a represenhrtion to the rcspondent No.l and on the repreaentation auh^nitted by t<ws pctitioncr, the reapendent p T XI-HC-22 sn^i^T ((;-fi.<* sn^i ^t-ti^i ^fsa ;& ^OTf^St^ ;;r\ • i •: "v' i'i'' -e^ 'S^ -tll'tlM'il, »Tiltl<ie, fatrtwy 1WfvK ai*ii<* 311^1 ^-RIISSR •(rfCT - 2s— , No.4 has ghwn speelfie r/^ 2 the State of M.P. the end«|rsementthat rf the pe'Htioner is relieved atlmlnlslrathni work to rte StBte of C.6. affei+ed wuuld not get adwrsely Leamed counsel for allowed tff mate a represcnt(iti<m itponde^ts leahied teanwd counsel for responde^t Having heard Kie regenl ta the faeti! <md allowed to make a de'ftiiled the re^wndent No.l withinl respondentNo.l i« direet^l petitioner by considering aU In an ohtjecthw; mannep. With these directiwis,| In vww of this I.A.No.10562^003 stand Parrtes are entltled fot' cr)i<<(Icn'4li 'RP^* ^ fs^ <f^^i< ^ arfigiT sn^r ^he petitiBner submittBd •that hc mny be to the respondcnt No.l t»which the ha< no obycetion. counsel for tbe partie* and htnring dr4ums*anees rf the case, the petitloner (s ^epresentation ruising all his grievances t» a period <rf 10 days from today and to deejde the repres«rtwtion of the V^s grievances and shall pass reasonttd order ^?1'.., . .... :... '' thc wri't''pctition is diapesed of. ^rder. M.(W.)P. No. 3§l5/2003 and di^poacd of. certifled eopy et thfc^rdu'^ Sd/- LC.Bhadoo Jiidge [^^fig^ / / ^^ -.t.^&slis!-,a:ii!sa!^iase--:' '•