{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.670 OF 2007 01- Sidharth Machindra Aakhade 02- Santosh s/o Machindra Aakhade 03- Aalaka Machindra Aakhade 04- Machindra Bhagoji Aakhade 05- Bhivarabai Machindra Aakhade All r/o Sidharth Chal, Behind Ganesh Mandeer, Kurla near. Kajupada Pipe Line, Mumbai. PETITIONERS VERSUS Kavita w/o Sunil Aakhade R/o Golegaon [Kagade] Tq. Washi Dist. Osmanabad., RESPONDENT *** Shri S.S.Mishra with P.V.Patil, advocates for petitioners Shri S.G.Jadhawar, advocate holding for Shri P.V.Jadhawar, advocate for respondent. *** Coram : R.M.Borde, J. Date: 02nd July 2009. ORAL ORDER: 01- The petitioners herein are raising exception to the order passed in Criminal Revision Application No.108/2007 on 06/09/2007. The {2} respondent herein presented a complaint alleging commission of offence punishable under Sec.323, 324, 504, 506[II] r.w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioners herein as well as the husband of the informant by name Sunil Machindra. The informant is the wife of Sunil whereas the petitioners herein are the brothers of the husband of the informant as well as wife of the brother and father of the husband of informant. 02- It is alleged by the complainant that on the date of incident all the accused together beat here as well as abused her. There appears to be disharmony in matrimonial relations of the complainant with her husband Sunil. On receipt of the complaint, the learned Magistrate directed issuance of process against the accused for offence punishable under Sec.323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners herein questioned the order passed by the Magistrate by presenting Revision Application NO.108/2007 and requested for quashing the order passed by the Magistrate in respect of issuance of process. The revision application was heard and disposed of by the Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge, Osmanabad vide order dated 06/09/2007. 03- Perused the complaint presented by the complainant before the Magistrate as well as the order passed by the Revisional Court. There are allegations in respect of commission of offence punishable under Sec.323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code in the complaint. At this stage, the {3} truthfulness or otherwise of the allegations contained in the complaint, cannot be gone into. The learned magistrate, was therefore justified in directing the accused to appear before him to face trial. The Revisional Court has adopted reasonable view of the matter and has turned down the revision application rightly. No interference is called for in this Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is rejected, however the trial Magistrate is directed to dispose of the complaint expeditiously and as far as possible within six months from today. [R.M.BORDE] JUDGE /mda/0709/cwp670.07