1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 93 OF 2009 Smt.Savita Rajan Wemulkar ... Petitioner v/s Shri Rajan Bhalchandra Wemulkar ... Respondent Mr.P.R.Yadav for the petitioner. Mr.Kantilal Kanojia for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 9TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C.: 1. The applicant has approached this Court contending that the divorce proceedings which are now pending in the Family Court, Pune, should be transferred to the Family Court, Mumbai. According to the applicant, it is extremely difficult to attend the Court in Pune and she has no source of income. She submits that presently she is residing with her father who is working as a driver and, therefore, has no means to support her for traveling all the way to Pune. 2 2. The learned advocate for the respondent states that the respondent is also very poor and he is a daily wage earner and therefore it is difficult for him to attend the Court in Mumbai. The application is thus opposed by the respondent. 3. In my opinion, the interest of justice would be met if the respondent is directed to pay the applicant an amount of Rs.300/- per date of hearing before the Family Court in Pune, so that she can travel to Pune accompanied by her father or any other person. 4. I am informed by the learned advocates appearing in the matter that the petition is now scheduled for hearing on 13.11.2009 before the Family Court, Pune. The respondent shall pay the applicant the aforesaid sum of Rs.300/- by 11.11.2009 so that she can travel to Pune. 5. The respondent shall pay to the applicant the fare on each date of hearing. 6. Accordingly miscellaneous civil application disposed of. ..... 3