C,f^ 'fw AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (SLNo4-sjszs" .\"^ ...^ ^^.'..n-^.'-''. ^;^-^'^J^ ^^0-^ '^•:^!:ff,^-7'" •tS" .^-'' t6'»sv.-' ^,^0- RESPONDENTS JBD-COP^ ,oi. [ BlLASt'UR PRAMOD KUMAR KANNOUJE, / S/0. SHRI JHALA RAM KANNOUJE, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, ASSISTANT TEACHER, GOVERNMENT BOYS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, MAHASAMUND, R/0. CLUB PARA, WARD N0.19, MAHASAMUND, TAHSIL 85 DISTRICT MAHASAMUND (C.G-). VERSUS 1) STATE OF THROUGH DEPARTMENT EDUCATION, RAIPUR (C.G.) CHHATTISGARH,, SECRETARY, OF SCHOOL DKS BHAVAN, ''"•"•^..^.Miifi^ :2) COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF TRIBAL WELFARE, RAIPUR (C.G.) :3) THE DIRECTOR, PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, RAIPUR (C.G.) WMT RBTITION UWD^ ^TICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^Sgrii(!t6SSCaK@&SUaS[rEik*ug flt atBM*rMB3Nifa3 XI-HC-22 3^^nqT?PT, aTn<^'ls, Rcliyy ?TM?tct» WHVll St)*11<*i 3^ fA>.:^^.^^S 200-1 ^vs. sn^TiRT ^iTOsn^r StlHiehtrfStT sn^TCTtnwHfsg' stil'Mfi'l'fl-l lTORffii'teIit';(f5RZTC ^arf^fTsn^T 30-8-; baiis Mrs. 1-israida Siddique, couns41 Miss Deepali Pandey, Panel advance copy. Heard both the counsel. By this writ petitiori under the petitioner has sought for c increments and seniority on the the light of the decision rendere^i Jabaipur in O.A.No.1452/1998 ^df M.P. Aothers) dated 31-1-2000. The case of the petitioner ij Schooi Education Department on pr^l salary. However, toter on CTfter coi^) was regularized but he is not bein9 situated tsachers moved the reguiar pay scale, wherein the leaif ailowed the same. The petitioner treatment as he \s a!so similarly si-| not paid any heed, therefore, he is Learned counsei for the pet) ailowed to maka a representction t<j to the petitioner and the same pa^ similarly situated teachers on accoul for the petitioner. Lawyer for the State/respondents, on Aitticle 226/227 of the Constitution of India, (iirection to the respondents to pay the >a^is of the date of his initial appointment in by the State Administrative Tribunal, 'ish Chandra Singh <& others vs. State of Stafe mitde ^ thst he wcs apposnted as Teacher in the fbation for a period of two years with fixed ipletion of two years tenure the petitioner ^iven the reguiar pcy scale. Other similcrty Administra+ive Tribunal, Jabalpur for tned Tribunal vide order dated 31-1-2000 severol repr'esentations to accord same ruated Teacher, but the respondents have •ijor-ced to fila this writ petition. tioner submits that the petitioner may be respondent No.l to 9'ive simitQr- treatment scale which has been sanctloned to other ht of the order of the State Administrative ('ft^^^-) XI-HC-22 TST •^Wl'ftl, g'tfl<H't(D, Rldiyy 3T1^?I ^i^) <Ti*ini g><Trai .^..^..^^ss^ ^..^................^ ^g^ Rfc^.' sn^T^ii f^rasn^T giiTwnfN' 3n^r?T(iRn:^f?tT •Z-+- °bi<<f<i'ifl-i 11*1 ciT ^ tecfl iRi<•<;!< ^sff^iTsn^r Cnfna dase <0 saihe Tribunol dated 31-1-2000, to whicH respoRdents has no objection. Havin9 heard iearned couns^l facts and circumstances of the counsel for the petitioner' appears the petitioner is ollowed to make a period of two wseks from todc^ respondent No.l shail decide the 30 days from the date of its receip[t the petitioner and taking into accoui^t iearned State Administrative Tribuilia petitionsr stcnds on the same then he be a!so sanctioned the samel With the direction aforesaid] Consequentiy, I.A.No.l Parties ore entitled for certil learned counsel appearing for the State/ .8169/2t306 for the parties and having re9ard to the ;, the iimited prayer made by learned be just, fair and reasonable. Therefore, 'epresentation to respondent No.l within a ••nsing ali his grievoncas ond ih tu"n, in an objective manner within a period of ', after considerin9 al! the points raised by the order datsd 31-1-2000 pssssd by the inO.A.No.1452/1998, and ifthepresent ig as ths petitioners in O.A.No.1452/1998, poy scale and seniority. the petition stands disposed of. also standa disposed of. :ied copy of this order. L.C.Shadoo juage (Ifl^y^)