IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43748 of 2009 SANJEEV KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 22.4.2010 Heard Mr. Vishwanath Prasad Sinha, learned Sr. counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the O.P. no.2 as also learned A.P.P. for the State. In compliance of order dated 2.4.2010 the petitioner and O.P. no.2 are physically present in the court and they have been duly identified by their respective counsels. When the matter was taken up on 2.4.2010 a common plea was taken that there are chances of reconciliation between the petitioner and O.P. no.2 either for restoration of matrimonial relationship or for one time settlement of entire dispute between the parties. Unfortunately when this matter has been taken up today for final disposal, it has been informed to the court that despite best endeavors made by the respective counsels the compromise could not be arrived at either for restoration of matrimonial relationship between the petitioner and the O.P. no.2, or for one time settlement of entire dispute. The petitioner had shown his willingness to keep the O.P. no.2 as his legally wedded wife or alternatively he made a proposal for payment of certain amount for one time settlement. O.P. no.2 has flatly refused to live with the petitioner as his legally wedded wife on the ground that he has solemnized marriage with another lady. For one time settlement she is claiming some more amount and, therefore, settlement could not be arrived at. In the aforesaid background, let the above named petitioner in - 2 - the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 82 of 2008, G.R. No. 1058 of 2008 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J. ) M.Rahman