1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 419 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.1823 OF 2005 . Om Prakash Roongta : Plaintiff versus Purushottam Sharaf & ors. : Defendants. Ms.P.Mhatre i/by Thakore Jariwala & co. for the Applicant/Plaintiff. Shri.V.V.Khemka for the Defendant Nos.1 to 4. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J DATED : OCTOBER 03, 2008 P.C. 1. By the above Chamber Summons, the Applicant/Plaintiff seeks direction against the Defendant Nos.1 to 4 directing them to give inspection of the documents relied upon by the Defendant Nos.1 to 4 in their Affidavit dated NIL September 2005 filed in Appeal No.797 of 2005 in Notice of Motion No.2205 of 2005 in the present Suit bearing No.1823 of 2005. 2 2. The learned Advocate Shri V.V.Khemka, appearing for the Defendant Nos. 1 to 4 states that the Plaintiff in fact actually does not require the said documents because the said documents were annexed to the Reply filed by the Defendants to the Notice of Motion filed by the Plaintiff. Nevertheless, he has no objection to grant inspection of the said documents provided the Plaintiff also grants inspection of certain documents sought by the Defendant Nos.1 to 4 by their letter dated 8th September 2005. The learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff states that the inspection of the said documents would be granted to the said Defendants. 3. Hence both the Plaintiff and the Defendant Nos.1 to 4 to carry out joint inspection of the respective documents sought by either of them. Same to be done within a period of four weeks from date at the time and place fixed at the convenience of the parties. With the above directions, the Chamber Summons is disposed of. 3 [R.M.SAVANT, J]