IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH: HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD (23RD) DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN Present: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Civil Revision Petition No.3857 of 2011 Between: Kasa Muthanna & another … Petitioners And: Sunke Rajanna & others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Civil Revision Petition No.3857 of 2011 ORDER: This revision petition is directed against the order dated 20.09.2010 in IA No.614 of 2010 in OS No.95 of 2005 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Jagtial, wherein the said application filed by the petitioners/defendants under Order 8 Rule 1-A CPC to receive certain documents, was dismissed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners/defendants. None appears for the respondents/plaintiffs, though served with notices. Perused the record. 3. The respondents/plaintiffs filed suit for declaration of title and for recovery of possession. The petitioners/defendants filed written statement, contesting the suit. After framing of the necessary issues, the trial of the suit has commenced. Plaintiffs’ side evidence closed after examining PWs.1 to 3. Defendants’ side evidence has commenced and DW.1 was also examined. At that stage, defendants filed two applications i.e., IA Nos.612 and 614 of 2010 under Order 8 Rule 1-A CPC seeking permission to receive certain documents. The respondents opposed the same by filing counters. By a common order dated 20.09.2010, the learned Senior Civil Judge dismissed both the applications mainly on the ground of delay in filing the documents. 4. The petitioners/defendants filed CRP No.5577 of 2010 assailing the order of dismissing IA No.612 of 2010. By order dated 12.08.2011, the said CRP was allowed, permitting filing of the documents, subject to proof and relevancy and also subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/-. The present revision is filed impugning the order in IA No.614 of 2010, which is also filed for the same relief of receiving of certain other documents. 5. In view of the orders passed earlier in CRP No.5577 of 2010, allowing the said revision and consequently allowing IA No.612 of 2010, the present revision petition is also covered by the said order and accordingly, the same is allowed adopting the reasoning mentioned in the earlier order and consequently, IA No.614 of 2010 also stands allowed and the documents filed along with the said application are permitted to be received subject to proof and relevancy. 6. In the result, the civil revision petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. __________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Date: 23.12.2011 bss