.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.126 OF 2006 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.268 OF 2006 Biochem Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. & Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr.Janak Dwarkadas, Sr.Counsel with Mr.Vicky Singh i/b M & M Legal Ventures, for the Petitioners. Mrs.S.M.Dandekar, A.G.P., for the State. .... CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : JUNE 08, 2006. JUNE 08, 2006. JUNE 08, 2006. P.C.: . In our opinion, the amendments sought to be introduced by Chamber Summons are not required for deciding the controversy in issue as it now stands. Hence, chamber summons is rejected. 2. If at any point of time there arises any subsequent cause of action and if the petitioners then are entitled to, apply for the very amendments which have been rejected today, this .[2]. order will not stand in their way. 3. As far as Petition is concerned S.O. next week. [F.I.REBELLO,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]