IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2011 / 21ST SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22095 of 2011(J) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ ATHIRA HARI, D/O.HARIKUMAR,HARIBHAVAN, PANNIVIZHA,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DIST.691 523. BY ADV. SRI.A.MOHAMED MUSTAQUE SRI.K.R.AVINASH (KUNNATH) RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 560. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 560. R1 & R2 BY ADV.SRI.T.A.SHAJI,SC, MG UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.22095/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE HALL TICKET OF 8TH SEMESTER EXAMINATIONS ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P2 COPY OF THE RESULTS OF 8TH SEMESTER B.TECH EXAMINATIONS DATED 15/07/2011 PUBLISHED IN THE WEBSITE OF THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY. P3 COPY OF THE APPLICATION FORM FOR SCRUTINY OF THE ANSWER SCRIPTS DATED 19/07/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. P4 COPY OF THE APPLICATION FORM FOR REVALUATION OF THE PAPER DATED 19/07/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. P5 COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 19/07/2011 ISSUED FOR THE APPLICATION FEES REMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR SCRUTINY AND REVALUATION. P6 COPY OF THE MARK LIST DATED 28/09/2010 OF THE PETITIONER ISSUED IN THE 6TH SEMESTER. P7 COPY OF THE MEMO OF REVALUATION RESULT OF THE PAPER GEO TECHNICAL ENGINEERING DATED 07/06/2011 OF THE 6TH SEMESTER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No. 22095 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of August, 2011. JUDGMENT Petitioner completed B.Tech(Bachelor of Technology) in Civil Engineering. When the result of the final Semester examination was declared, she had failed in one paper. She applied for scrutiny and revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the scrutiny and revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the scrutiny within two weeks and the revaluation within eight weeks sought for by the petitioner of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for scrutiny and revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. rkc