IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 7TH AUGUST 2008 / 16TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 22986 of 2008(J) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------- BIJU.K.R., S/O.K.V.RAPPAI KURUTHUKULANGARA HOUSE VELUTHUR PO.,THRISSUR. BY ADV. SMT.S.MUMTAZ SHUMSUDDIN RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- INDIAN BANK, MO ROAD BRANCH REP. BY ITS MANAGER MO.ROAD, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.S.EASWARAN FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J ================== W.P(C)No.22986 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 7th day of August, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is challenging proceeding under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 initiated by the respondent. The petitioner seeks facility to pay amounts in instalments. This is vehemently opposed by the Counsel for the respondent. According to him the petitioner has already approached three forms for identical reliefs. He has filed a suit, in which an injunction has been sought, he has filed an application before the Government for stay of a revenue recovery proceedings, in which the Government granted facility to pay the amounts in 30 instalments, which was defaulted by the petitioner, and the petitioner's father filed an appeal before the Debt Recovery Tribunal which coming up for hearing today. None of the above statements are disputed by the Counsel for the petitioner. The present writ W.P(C)No.22986 of 2008 - 2 - petition is the 4th one. The petitioner cannot be permitted to prosecute four different remedies, in respect of the same cause of action simultaneously. Therefore, I do not find any merit in this writ petition and accordingly, the same is dismissed. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs