?•<";, ^ ^aga/Vfl. •••»• l^(- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petitlon N^, 3'2>s^ / 2006 PETITIQ^NER Service matter :.R.Shrivas aged about 50 years S/o. Late C.R. Shrivas R/o. Qtr.No.H-ll, Irrigation Colony, Rampur RESEOJID^NTS ^ ^,;fS^f^;., t -i>-x. -<fr /y '%.'^^-^_-'^,¥// "%,f ? ff'oe^'..^ •^v^ ./- -^ •rf£>-/ .AS.^0 ^ Tahsil and Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Water Resources Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Sub-Divisional Officer (R ) ^ Korba, District Korba (C.G.) 3. Executive Engineer Minimata Bango Nagar Sambhag Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4. Krishna Kumar Agrawal S/o. Unknown, profession- businessman, R/o. Qtr.No.A/l, Irrigation Colony, Rampur, Tahsil and District Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^^t x^ .•0,--"-A V ^A' ^^ XI-HC-78 ^IH^rtl Sb^fch 3^ '^WM-tf, ®-rfl*1'16,Rlltldy ^^..U .]^15,.^..^^^^oo4 3iT^?T ira^T (yit^q^.g') sn^rqn-f^ri^ (raTsn^aiigww QQ'S-^F y^ WTTW TlfgTT SD^T has 7.8.2006:- Shri Gautam Khetrapal, cour^sel Shri Satlsh Gupta, Dep^ity respondents No.1 and 2, on advan^e Heard both the counsel. By the instant petition, the p^t 27-6-2006whereby the petitioner irrigation Departmentwhich is in his| The allegation against the quarter of tte Irrigation Departntent petitioner has been transferred from| A limited prayer has bee(i petitioner that as the petitioner is arrangement at Kharsiya, therefoi|e, quarter within a period of 2 months <rc Looking to the limfted pra^< petitioner and having considered the petitioner may be allowed to 2006 provided he furnishes an vacate the quarter on or before 11^ <ftl<lFfl41-f KltldT ff fel^ <ra]<n;l< ^73Tf^R'3t1^r fbr the petitioner. Govt. Advocate for the State/ copy. ^titioner has challenged the order dated been asked to vacate the quarter of possession. rtetitioner is that he is not vacating the even after his transfer, as the |KortetoKhareiya. made by learned counsel for the tequired to take some time for maldng i, he may be allowed to vacate the (rom today. ^er made by learned counsel for the iacts and circumstancesof the case, •Iracate the quarter by 11 September un<|lertal<ing before the S.D.O. that he will Seotember 2006. In case, he faiis to trie vacaie the quarter within the stipjjlated period, then disciplinary action may be initiated against the petition^r. In view ofthe above, the petftfon Consequently, M.P/V.)P. No.; Parties are entitled for certifield stands dtsposed of. }007/2006 also stands disposed of. copyofthisorder. SEil- i C^ QnsetHO judse P.T.O. .^'