vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5806 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.5806 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.5806 OF 2007 Mr.Sattaya Pappaya Wadicharla ... Petitioner V/s. Ramsingh Raghunandan Singh Chowhan & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.R.D. Oak for Petitioner Ms.Asmita Sali for Respondent No.1 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. MHATRE, J. DATED: SEPTEMBER 24, 2007 SEPTEMBER 24, 2007 SEPTEMBER 24, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The petition has been filed against several orders passed by the Labour Court and the Industrial Court. The genesis of these orders is an order in complaint (ULP) No.582 of 1997. The ex-parte order passed in that complaint on 22.7.1998 was challenged in this Court by filing writ petition No.8912 of 2003. By an order of 23.4.2004, the writ petition was dismissed. Admittedly, there is no Letters Patent Appeal preferred against this order of 23.4.2004. All other orders which are challenged in the present petition are consequential to the order passed on 27.7.1998. Since the petition challenging that order has been dismissed, nothing survives in the present petition. 2. Mr.Oak, appearing for the petitioner, submits : 2 : that his client had not brought to his notice the fact that he had in fact challenged the order in complaint (ULP) No.582 of 1997 by filing writ petition No.8912 of 2003 which had been dismissed. In fact, there is no reference to this petition at all in the present petition. In my view, therefore, this writ petition deserves to be dismissed. The amount of Rs.29,680/- which has been deposited in this Court pursuant to the order dated 24.8.2007 shall be paid over to the respondent workman. 3. Petition is rejected accordingly.