1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1486 of 2010 Anil Rameshchandra Khandelwal ...VERSUS.. Krupaldas Rupchand Sindhi through LRs =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==- C ORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 07th MAY, 2010. Heard Mr. A.P.Chawre, the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner/defendant wanted respondent/ plaintiff to produce Lease Deed on record to show that the plaintiff is not the owner, but Lesee from the State Government. The trial court has rejected that application. The learned counsel contends that the issue of title was not involved in the rent control proceedings. Mr. Bhoot, learned counsel holding for Mr. R.L. Khapre, Advocate states that the Rent Controller has found respondent/plaintiff to be the landlord and owner and that issue operates as res-judicata. I find that it is not necessary for this Court to go into this controversy. The petitioner/defendant has sought production of some documents on record. The relevancy thereof and effect of its non-production can be considered by the trial court in accordance with law. No case is made out warranting any interference at this stage in writ 2 jurisdiction. Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE. Diwale