IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42726 of 2009 MAHENDRA SINGH, Son of Late Rajpati Singh, resident of Village- Sonkhar, P.S. Chandradeep, District- Jamui..........................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR..................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 04. 11.02.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 342, 447, 448, 323, 504, 506, 384, 385, 387 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. By an order dated 17.12.2009, the case diary and the antecedent report of the petitioner was called for but on 27.01.2010 when the antecedent report was not received it was submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that in paragraph no.4 of the petition it had been stated that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Today, when the case is being taken up for admission, the antecedent report of the petitioner has been received which reveals that there is one other case of similar nature pending against the petitioner and in paragraph no. 58 of the case diary there is mention of three cases pending against the petitioner. Under the circumstances, I am not inclined to consider the merits of the case and for which reason alone, this application is dismissed. U.K. (Anjana Prakash,J)