6r<^^0^^^^3^-^n&G»ltt^<3'10^'0'^TO-^^O^Q' In the HonbI&fflBsh Court ofS'liliattisllsarhatBaasrour (C Wf^o .... G^. ..^^^^ Petitioner \^ Respondents •s Ram Kumar Malekar aged 47yeats' S6niofBinjwarMalekar,Patwaii,of P.C. Circle ss No.l. Village Sakhra, Tahsil BalodBistrict Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. State Govemment ofChhattishgarh, Through the Secretaiy, Revenue Departmeiit Ministry, D.K.StBKavan, Raipur (G.G.) 2. The Sub Drvisional OfBcer, Balod, District Durg (C.G.) Writ Petitioner under Articles!226/22'7 6fthe Cdnstitution! of Iriflia. ^S^T "yi'EI(cl'4,.«>'fl+l< , T^cll-H^, ^.fa. a e/Q,^ imipiKOHKh gn^r^raqi' ^icity«tli) sn^i q>i K-ii'ti ^?T 3TI^9T ^afltcb ^ i^im^fcisii^i 17.01.2005:- Shri AjayShrivasfavsi.counselfitrthe Shri Akhil jctgrawal, P.L.fOTtheiSt The petitioner has prefe'ired V^ transfer drder of Annexure P/1 bys.yhj atserial No. 4 on the above order had District-KabirdhEun, ps petition as he is aggrieved by the |ch tHe petitjoner whose name^ppears been transferred from District-Durg to Leamed counsel for the petitioner whd is| a Ratwari are gov^ Manual and as per Clayse-7 of tti^, subjected to (rarisfer from one Patwaif concemed Sub-dMsional Qfficer or dh/ision by the prfter of eollector transfer of Patwan fromone Distriet counsel submils ttiat for maintaining tl] the tahsil ahd it cari not be from one will advereely affect the seniority ®f submits that that ends bf justice wiffiti^ to make a detailed representation be) grievances raised in this petitiori with a | thestipulatedtime.l haVeheani^leameclGounself6r|theFeSReetweparties. Considering ^ the> subn-iissions opmionon the ments pfthe case, 1 an( ofthe opinionffiatft^ will be served if ai direction is givefi ^nf?F^TiWIHi if •fSi^:'!&T%R .i? siRm siita. ;• ' ^petjtioner. ;ate/respondents. peUti(>neF submits that the services of the imed t>y Part-1 ISfl.P. Lahds Records abpve Manual, the~ Patwari can be circle to ariother Pafwan cjrcle'byths fl»m one sub-division t6 anothar sub- cs|iC8med any there is no provision pf another Districiti Therefore, learned ^p seniority li$t transfer is made within District to another District as the satne petitioher. l.earhed eouhsel furijher served ifthe petitioriens giyeriljberty (ore the State Govemmenf raising his Frectiontodisposepfthe samewitliin tb ftte CTiade and without exf)ressihg aiiy tothepetitioner!fo_ni!a!®ai:letailed GRPRJ—FS/350—12/2000—50.QOO, 'Swf '•yi''-IH<4,^ ®Ttl+t4. ,&ls11^!i±< -J^..^..S.&M':k si^si 'qg^ ('p^s?) '*l<lisf<l1-( •<[*«•?('ii'f3tStih$R •^iSifiCTSiI^I sn^i'viK-iw Tmian^iwire SI^T — y ffll: Y>^ representatioti raisjng- his grievanc^s resp'ondents atong with the^copy of and' 6n ^uch Y;representa^on bew^ responelents shall decide th^ same as. early^'as pdssible preferayiy''wnthini n8c;eigFotWg^epnesentation. this $n learriBi 'cotinsgl fpr ttia petttjjaner been relievea and therefore, he ma^ placeofposting.' - ? tt is directed^ that if the petitfoner persan has notijojned in his place, th|e titt the represenlaBQa 'is decjded.' lt| already been relieved or other per^on petitioner, then this order will not ^riftle placeofposting. WiththeiatioSi'eobsen^tons, Conseqyently, M.W.P.N&.t09/2005 of. •. befwe the competent authority of ! petition and this orderwithin 15 days macle the comRetent authbrity Qf its own msrits in accordance with law aperipdoftwomonthsfrointhedateof submits that the petitioner has not be allowed to continue jn the present has not been relieved and other petifloner may be allowed to cQntiriue is made clear that if the petitionsr has ,hag already joined jri place of the tha petittoner to rejoin at the earlier tttfrgetitignstandSidisposedof. ancj I.A.NQ.64SQ06 stand disposed GRPR.i—FS/350—12/2000—50,000. nin.