^ S isil;iil,r .1^ rs^ l;: O) c^j '^Q IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) No. f50| OF 2011. PETITIONERS r^ ^ i>M .^°w s'/ jfe'y/ .<f /?' ^6 ..s jlw ^: 1. Gaukarana Singh Thakur, S/o. Shri Kanshi Ram Thakur, aged about 56 years, Head Master, Govt. Primaiy School Gidhali, Block Charama, District Kanker (C. G.) ^2. Ravi Shankar Darro, S/o. Shri Peela Rarn Darro, aged about 54 years, Head Master, Govt. Primary School Usendipara, Khairwahi, Block Charama, District Kanker (C. G.) ^, 3. Sukhi Ram Bhoyar, S/o. Shri Binjhwar Ram, aged about 54 years, Head Master, Govt. Primary School Pusadhari, Block Antagarh, District Kanker (C. G.) ^ '^ VERSUS ,..^j . !s. RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G. 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Kanker, District Kanker (C. G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Charama, District Kanker (C.G.) 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Kanker, District Kanker (C. G.) WRIT PETITION UNDE^_ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDIA The petitioners named above beg to submit as under:- A 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS: As given in the above cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS; As given in the above cause title. .V"^ NIGHCOVRTOP€HMATTISGARH:BILASPUR WRITPETITION (S) N0. 1301 OF ^)11 PETITIONERS Gaukaran Singh Thakur & Others Versus RESPONDENTS State of ChhatUsgarh & ottiers (Writ Petition under ^tide 226 <rf the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for ttie petitionere. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govemment Advoeate for ttie State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 10th day oif March, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for ttie parties. 2. Learned Rpyo^t a(:^i^nrigfoTfte^^^ : su^itelt^thepe^orjeredoncrtv^n^ ^n meirjts at thfe st^e, :and pra^ for vnthdrawal. vf this petitipnwithliber^tomakearepre^rrt^oninlhelig^ cireular dated 27,12.2008 (Ann®<ureJ3/@). ; ; 3. l^arr^ Gpyt Adypc^ite app?^^ sybmits "that if a representatipn js macte, t^ same ghall ebe consictered an<^ dwidedwjthjna^nodoffc Ihe date of r^^pt of th& above stated cireular 4. In vjj?w of ^resoing, ttie p^ation is djsmissBd as withdrawn with ttie abpye-stetedjifcigrly.tt te q3e<?te^:1hatth»conc^rned7 auftoriti^ wpuld c^nsider anddea^ the ^ any, as aboye, withirr a period of sb( weeks'from the'dgto of receipt of the represerrtation along w a copyoflhworder. » .fi I- Satish K. Agi Judge astiok