IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.2965 of 2007 Date of Decision:- 27.03.2008 Hari Kishan ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.Pankaj Jain, Advocate. vs. Sant Ram and others ....Respondent(s) through Mr.R.S.Hooda, Advocate. *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 13.6.2006 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Faridabad, dismissing the petitioner-plaintiff's application for ad-interim injunction as well as the order dated 20.4.2007 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Faridabad dismissing the petitioner's appeal against the above-stated order. In other words, both the Courts below have denied ad-interim injunction to the petitioner. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, learned counsel for the parties have been heard. Concededly, the respondent-defendant No.1 had suffered a consent decree in favour of his minor children on 3.5.1999 in respect of the suit land much before he allegedly executed a sale deed in respect thereto in favour of the petitioner on 12.2.2001. The petitioner having stepped into the shoes of defendant No.1 who had no valid title on the date when the C.R. No.2965 of 2007 -2- sale deed was executed, has apparently failed to make out a case of grant of ad-interim injunction as prayed for. Dismissed. March 27, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE