¥% @7/ @ 3mm 85m, IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petitiomsmo‘ égzg Li /2009 , Hernant Solanki S /o Late Shri Mavji Bhai Solanki, aged about 55 years, working as Assistant Engineering, Water Supply Nagar Nigam Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) {I PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENT 1) State of Chhattisgarh through The Under Secretary, Urban Administration and Development Department D. K. S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2) The Joint Director, Urban Administration and Development Raipur (C.G.) 3) The Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.) i WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \q}\ l H‘GH SOUR“? 6F CH&ATT§$$ARH g? $¥LASP§JR WRH PETiTiOM €$) NO. $23$ Qi: 2a§3 Hamam Swank; ?e€i‘i‘iener Versas §¥esp9néenis SW3 of Qhhmtis‘agam & GmerS W“ "" F3E THC)? \JDER AR W‘Lm 226 CL F‘r‘E CO JaTE U?" ‘ GF mil;— (§E . sfaioa’bie ‘v’ir. aaizsn K, zagmimLrL J") E‘resmiz- Shvi L‘eepari iém wmai‘evol we ,ae Shri MN. Ray, Pami Lawva: fm‘ mu $ta‘éeu Eshri ’Pamka} AgrawaL iaavacaw §ar i’ha wwwdwt N0.3. £mbE§a uRALg ’Pa¢seti on Ii {da ' 5n Jamaal 2G1 i} 3». Ix) Heard teamea‘ caunse§ for ihe 9art§ea By i‘raQs petitian‘ the pewmue! cha Eenges the ieNaiizy am; vaiiciéi'y of me omel dated 6$/8:i2&6§ Arnexure Pr ow wmr‘h {We petitiamer baa been wanslevaa am wvmmma Larpm'azmw, maipmto Muaia§pa¥¢armmmrz B§§aspun We p mwner Ema sralEemas J‘e Gfde‘ dauea aww $383 a‘izlmrgexLére Pf j; by wh§ch fha reme$entatiaa sabmit‘ted kw ihe peti‘igéoner has been 'eiected‘ Lgamed counssi awe-aiiag fin" thé pet§téene¥ mimai$ haw ihe mam m waa working in Mumcimi Ccrporakn 0n the {Myst m’ A$$§M£am Efwgsmew @ki’ate? Sugggw a‘i: Ra§pm By ardrgr cia’ieai QEWQGOE: {Amexure RH}. {he pe?ii§aner has beer: ‘wansferrw fmm Muniawai {impuraimm Raipu‘r 10 Mumdaal Cmpmamn, $iiaawr m spiE 5f {ha km "L‘ha% an empioyea camo‘E be Ea‘ansfez'fed Mam 0mg Mani-5mg): Cewmaiim w ariathe: Marimba? CarmratEoa. 89mg aggrieved by me said mdgf. Qhe pe‘ii‘kiww p¥%‘ferrad a wit pe‘xman iseibre ims Cami beirag Mijiis‘; Nc.345§/2ZJG€- whim wa$ ciiswged 0f mm umr‘ ""y crder datee 2“;O?;20Q§ (énnexure 9m :eSawmg mam; ihe meti‘téoner ‘zc- make mmesenmiim befarsa me :eswfiden’a aui?mr;:tae$. subsequently, the petité€ma¥ sabmi‘lied a repmsentaiiaai daiéd r~ 23fGW2GGQ (Annexure Pm before the resmmiefxi' authoriiéa by raiazing a}? 0n hi3 grievance. ’The sa myesé‘mataon was ‘eected vy *hr— ’sespenden‘i au‘xtirmvties [3y 0mm daLeij 21IG mam (Ar; emu; W8} hoiciing the i‘ne omer ‘ciatefi 03/‘G71‘2GOQ (a‘asmexure W1} was §asseci cm deputaéioa sas§s. Leamed caunsei annea¥ing fm ike pei‘wenef fa aid. x svbwab ’Thai t r resaonciem au’zhea'iiies Mimi/1% ccngiaiei‘ma ihe facts am mg'sumglmce5 of the base rage/ciao: ‘zhe représemaf‘imrl m‘ ihe wii‘tiorze: in an :3 egg aaq . )0 A t / amEimy mamer and withwi appWa’Eiam af mind. {n fact, m the omer Gated OBiMXEGGg {Ana‘eexure PM) R has beer; meniianed €h&t the aemEQne? was sent ta Bmassm (m frstnsfer not 0m denm'azian basia ‘E‘he impugneti action 0f ihe resgaomiemt authm‘ities is sagainw the movisiama af‘ me ChhattEsgam Municipa! Carparatian Act, 1%6’ {for Shmt “m9 Acé am, Gr: ihe vizier ham, Shr: Rey‘ §aamad Pane; Lawyer ameming é'br ’{he “3mm submits that the $‘iate {Eevemmem 3:5 fmiv camneiem Lmdai’ ihe grwisians m“ gub-Sécticn (§) of $ec€ion 58. af the Act W56 Wmch pmvMeS far tmwfer on deputatiort tarry omcer 0r Séwant Gf a WfLmécEp&E Samaratmm fa any $ther E¥éunicépa§ Gammai‘mx. Thus, ami tramaw made fmm we carporgtmm ts anather mrparaimm: L by way sf depa€a§ien Though: in me 3m? omen ii wass mt rriemécmed that tha trawfer am dwwmwm arid subaewemiy fr: the seccm’i ardern Ei has ‘aréen simpiy a§a§f§e¢i Withou‘i sharwgmg the {tawra The ward used Ere the gnm‘xiisicnrvs a? ¥aw is ’imra3fer an depmatkm accaréingivb i? MaS r;§a;'§fieci. Shri Agrawai %eamed ceumseé anpnéaring fey mg respohdent No.3 sag}? Gm the submisatémn mwe by ma mam-ed wumral appearmg fer the ‘ 955”}. a J“ 0n examinaticn 0f the firs? ewe? dated G3J‘G'7i290§ {wmexme Pf’s‘s. which was impugned m WPISE NG.3MQ!2%§ and the Wm petitéon wgxa dEsgmsea‘ 9f or; 21%?!2Qi1g (Anmexwe W6} wserving Ftberty io the petiiésner t0 make a fresh represantaimh to ma amthovmea AccvrtiingEy, ’me remesewtaibm wezs made am me authcrmas, by order detail? 21;‘G§:”2UO§ {Armexure W3) mjeci’ed the g‘epmsemaEfcm hoic’ing the eai§ier tmnSfa ewe? as if: i$ arid me same wag done m administra€év ex§gemy. 3t was ‘fm’iher expiainaci ma? the $aid tramfér mav be yesated as an q§e§utat§on Thu3. the conien‘iimn m“ S'mi Jain! ieamezi wumei for ihe geiiftéoner ihai there i$ Geniusicn whether ii: i$ a iiansfer or depma‘iiom is reiec‘ked as sub-semim {.5} of iha Sacthm 58 of i‘ne Aai. 1956 provides fer transfer 0'? empicvee of municibm camaraiwn to anumer municépai cemmaiien on deputatbn. Sub-sewer; {5‘3 ef ‘the SectEan 68 0f ”the Ate?! ’19% rews‘ as under:- “Notwi‘ths‘kanciing arsvthing camaéned if; this #3: a? am; rasies or bye~§aws made the¥e£jmen the State Governmené may ambiec‘E m {zine ccmz§itiaewsa spech‘aeci in sub—seséiani;§}y trangfer can deputaiion {any affine: m sserva‘rzi’ wf a Munismai Qapwamm} L; any c'k’nea" Mimécmaé Gwemmani €2arpoga‘iiom am‘ to ccawsuit it sha‘E mt mthar be ”ma nece§aary Qalrmmtian for the er ‘Eate the; nfs‘ guicer a; Sewam £ mamea" heme pasamg an omiar a? trénsfer on depataticwm wafer this; sub—wctiom’i e £G §n Vi'ew of fwegomg, there is m i¥re§u£arity atnzi it ‘sa m agcoméince with law and binder the pfov§séons of §aw. The peémaneg’ 10. Thus, ihe writ pe‘iiké‘m devom of mei‘t ’1 ‘z. No omier asto costs iegaity m ihe crder passeé by me authorE‘gms, as she $€ate is fuéiy wmpe‘teni i‘o pass the sidef arm tha same s af has not impug;2ed ‘Eha crde?‘ c?” karasfgi' on any a‘mef gmundE whéch may be admissiwe far irsierfefence, , ar‘d is accardmg‘i’y d§$m§5sem. Sdf- 5 Judge J SatishK. AgnEhatri