IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1425 of 2010 Sukhu Prasad, son of late Mangal Prasad, resident of Mohalla-Yarpur Mushari, P.S. Gardanibagh, P.O. G.P.O., District-Patna ----- Petitioner--- Appellant. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, having its office situated at Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, P.S. Shastri Nagar, District- Patna. 2. The Patna Municipal Corporation through the Municipal Commissioner, having its office situated at Budha Marg, P.S. Kotwali, District-Patna. 3. The Chief Accounts Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, having its office situated at Budha Marg P.S. Kotwali, District-Patna ----- Respondents ----Respondents. 4. Lamu Lal, son of late Chtru Ram, resident of Mohalla- Raijay Krishna Road Mitanghat, P.S. Jhauganj, District- Patna. 5. Dip Narayan Choudhary, son of Ram Sevak Choudhary, resident of Village-Doma Sheikhpura, P.S. Pipra, P.O.-Sorangpur, District-Patna. 6. Anil Kumar, son of late Narayan Prasad, resident of Mohalla Hakimganj, P.S. Mehddiganj, District-Patna. 7. Harakh Raut, son of Sanjay Raut, resident of Village- Ram Budhiyapur, P.S. & P.O. Riga, District-Sitamarhi. 8. Gopal Prasad Sharma, son of late Sidhar Prasad Singh, resident of Village and P.O. Sarsar, P.S. Naubatpur, District-Patna. 9. Kishori Ram, son of late Ram Briksh Ram, resident of Mohalla_Yarpur, P.S. Gardanibagh, District- Patna. 10. Amar Nath Prasad Singh, son of late Vizar Prasad, resident of Mohalla-Purvi Indira Nagar, P.S. Kankarbagh, District-Patna. 11. Nirmal Kumar Yadav, son of late Panu Lal Yadav, resident of Mohalla_Purvi Lohanipur, P.S. Kadam Kuan, District-Patna. 12. Ram Bali Sharma, son of late Ram Lakhan Singh, resident of Mohalla-R.M.S. Colony, Kankarbagh, P.S. Kankarbagh, New Janta Medical Hall, District-Patna. 13. Sheo Nath Paswan, son of late Swami Paswan, resident of Mohalla-Yarpur, Jogia Toli, P.S. Gardanibagh, District- Patna 2 ----- Petitioners/Performa-Respondents. ---------------- I.A. No. 8019 of 2010 4. 12.10.2010 None appears on behalf of the appellant. Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar for the Patna Municipal Corporation and its functionaries. This application has been filed under the provisions of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, seeking condonation of delay of 106 days in preferring this appeal. We are not convinced with the explanation offered in this application. Secondly, we do not find any adverse observation in the order of the learned Single Judge so that the appellant could maintain this appeal. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to condone the delay in filing this appeal. I.A. No. 8019 of 2010 is rejected. Consequently, the appeal also stands dismissed. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar,J. ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)