IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.18010 of 2011 Date of Decision.23.09.2011 Satish Kumar s/o Niranjan Singh, resident of H.NO.708, Sector 14, Faridabad, Haryana .....Petitioner Versus Union of India and another .....Respondents Present: Mr. Buta Singh Bairagi, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Notice of motion. 2. Mr. Karminder Singh, Standing Counsel for UOI accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner will supply two copies of writ petition to the counsel appearing for the respondents during the course of day for proper communication of the order. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the writ petition is treated to be representation and an appropriate decision may be taken by respondent No.2 within a particular time. 4. The writ petition may be treated as representation and respondent No.2 shall consider the representation and take an appropriate decision within six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 23, 2011 Pankaj*