IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23273 of 2009 1. RAMESH MAHTO 2. UMESH MAHTO BOTH SONS OF JAGDISH MAHTO, RESIDENT OF KATHARIYA, P.S. ADAPUR, DISTRICT – EAST CHAMPARAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 03.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under sections 364(A)/2/6, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that First Information Report is against unknown. However, there is no specific allegation against these petitioners. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused have been released on bail by order dated 14.12.2008 vide Annexure- 3. It is further submitted that other co-accused persons who were put on sessions trial have been acquitted in Sessions Trial No. 147 of 2004 (Annexure-2). Learned counsel for the State submits that victim in his statement stated that five persons fled away when police came, however, he did not name any particular persons. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari in connection with Adapur P.S. Case No. 73 of 2003. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)