IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51580 of 2008 BIMAL KUMAR @ GAUTAM KUMAR son of Hrishankar Prasad, resident of village Raghopur Bakhari, P.S. Sitamarhi, District Sitamarhi … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri Ashok Kumar Jha For the State: Shri Dinesh Singh APP ----------- 2. 23.1.2009 Heard. The petitioner is in custody in a case under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and in spite of that has not been put on T.I. Parade. There is no recovery either from his possession. The learned Additional Sessions Judge has referred to the paragraph of the case diary containing the statement of Santosh Kumar who was accompanying the informant and who has stated that the accused persons were calling each other by their names and from that he could learn that the present petitioner was also one of the culprits. The contention is that there is no fact stated in the F.I.R. Let the above named petitioner be released on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 2 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in Parsauni P.S.Case No. 22 of 2008. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)