IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38272 of 2008 Sanjeev Kumar Thakur @ Dabloo, Son of Sri Mahesh Thakur, Resident of village- Gandhi Nagar, P.S. Ishipur, District- Bhagalpur. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Nakul Jha, Son of Narayan Jha, Resident of Gandhi Nagar, P.S. Ishipur, District- Bhagalpur. 3. Amit Kumar Jha, Son of Sri Nakul Jha, Resident of Gandhi Nagar, P.S. Ishipur, District- Bhagalpur. ----------- 2 22.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed against the order dated 14.09.2006 and 12.01.2006 by which the Court has clubbed the Complaint Case No.315 of 2005 and Pirpainti P.S. Case No. 55 of 2004 to be heard together under Section 210 of the Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the complainant and P.S. Cases are different. It is said that he has filed the complaint case whereas the police case has been filed against unknown. The question is that both the cases relate to the same offence. In one case the I.O. has filed the case, not naming any person as accused, whereas the complaint case has been filed against specific accused persons. The allegations in the complaint case and the first information report are the same and as such I do not see any illegality in clubbing the cases together to be heard together during the trial. This application is dismissed. Md. Ibrarul ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.) 2