IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.2614 of 2007 Date of Decision:21.05.2007 Smt. Ashu Aggarwal and another .....Petitioners Vs. State Bank of India and another .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. S.S.Chopra, Advocate for the petitioners. **** M.M.KUMAR, J. The instant petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to accept the NPA amount declared by the bank to be payable by the petitioners in their account and to settle the account of the petitioners as per guidelines circulated by the Reserve Bank of India vide its No.RBI/2005/153 RPCD. PLNFS. BC No.39/06. 02.31/2005-06 dated 3.9.2005 (Annexure P-1). For the relief claimed in the instant petition, the petitioners have already made representations dated 26.3.2006 and 28.3.2006 (Annexures P.2 and P.3) to the respondents. Without going into the merits of the case, we deem it just and appropriate to direct the respondents to take cognizance of the representations dated 26.3.2006 and 28.3.2006 (Annexures P.2 and P.3) sent by the petitioners and decide the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is presented to him. However, it is made clear that decision of representations would not confer any right on the petitioners. It shall be appreciated if a speaking order is passed. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. ( M.M.KUMAR ) JUDGE May 21, 2007 ( RAJESH BINDAL) renu JUDGE