PETITIONERS : <!.»- r ^.1 :^ = c -WS^ (5 <t^ 2^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0.5^6^-QF 2009 ^^ ^•v/^ /2. Smt. Uma Garg, W/o Ravi Prasad Garg, aged about 41 years, R/o Ward No. 7, Adbhar, Tahsil Malkharoda, District Janjgir-Charapa (CG). Chandramani, S/o Piladau, aged about 60 years, R/o Ward No.15, Adbhar, Hardi Tahsil Malkharoda, District Janjgir- Champa (CG), \""'^ Versus RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Urban Administration, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, (CG). Director, Department of Urban Administration, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, (CG). Collector, Dist. Janjgir- Champa (CG). Nagar Panchayat, Adbhar, Malkharoda, District Janjgir- Champa (CG), through its Chief Municipal Officer. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ ^ "•^sas •fV, ^ HLGHCOURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETITION (0 No. 5467 of2009 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS Smt. Uma Garg & another. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bleShri Satish K. AgiiihotriLJ, Present: Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri Rahul Tamaskar, Advocate for the respondent No. 3, ORDER rORAL) (Passed on 16th day of September, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instmctions, submits that with fhe passage of time, this petition has become infmctuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side do not controvert the above submission. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infi-uctuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit