IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 8582 of 2011(W) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- BEEVIKUNJI,W/O.ABDU(LATE),VALIYAPARAMBIL WARD NO.XVII,AZHEEKODE PO,ERIYAD PANCHAYATH, TRICHUR 680 673. BY ADV. SRI.C.N.SAMEER RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TRICHUR 680 001. 3. ERIYAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,ERIYAD,TRICHUR DISTRICT 680 001. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MR. V. VIJU LAL R3 BY ADV. SRI.G.SANTHOSH KUMAR (P) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 8582 OF 2011 ......................................................................... Dated this the 9th November, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers: “i) a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ order of direction direciting the 3rd respondent to disburse Rs.5,00,000/- forthwith for the damages caused to her property and homestead and direct him to confiscate the amount from the previous President, Previous Chairman standing Committee and previous member of Ward NO. 17 of the Panchayath. ii) a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ order or direction directing the 3rd respondent to restore the property to the petitioner's property which was taken for widening the Arappamunakkal road iii) a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ order or direction directing the 3rd respondent to compensate the petitioner adequately to the tune of damages caused to the property of the petitioner forthwith iv) Any other appropriate order or direction directing the respondents as this Honourable Court deem fit, just and proper as per the W.P.(C) No. 8582 OF 2011 2 facts and circumstances of the case. v) Award costs and render justice.” 2. Obviously, the grievance of the petitioner has been ordered to be redressed by passing Ext. P11 judgment dated 16.02.2011. Alleging contumacious act on the part of the respondents, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing C.O.C. No. 555 of 2011 . 3. The concerned respondent has filed an affidavit in the said case stating that the work has already been completed and the house has been handed over to the petitioner. Accordingly, the said Contempt of Court case has been closed today, vide separate order. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not intend to press the writ petition any further. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk