1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1532 of 2008 Gurubeosingh s/o Hiraman Moon ...vs.. Fulchand D. Chourasia & another __________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Shri R. V. Gaikwad, Advocate for petitioner. Shri S. B. Ahirkar, AGP for R. No. 2. CORAM : A. H. JOSHI, J. DATED : 03/04/2008. 1. The petitioner's grievance is that the question which were held irrelevent or otherwise impermissible are rejected. According to petitioner this rejection is summary adjudication and ought to have been done as adjudication. Learned Advocate has placed reliance on reported judgment in the case of “Bipin Shantilal Panchal...vs.. State of Gujrat and another AIR 2001 Supreme Court 1158”. 2. Heard Advocate R. V. Gaikwad for the petitioner and considered the judgment cited by the petitioner. 3. It is seen the case Bipin Shantilal (supra) pertains to adhoring the practices of withholding adjudication on admissibility of the document and prescribing the practice to be followed. Which is not an issue falling for decision in present petition. 2 4. The order impugned is interlocutory. The challenge, if any, would always be open to the petitioner in regular appeal. 5. On this ground alone, no interference is called. Petition is dismissed. JUDGE. Jsa.