(^- l^T- IN THE HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.S.No. S^^^/10 PETITIONER Bhujbal Yadaw, S/o Late Narayan Prasad, aged about 48years, Lab Tech. Gramya Bhariti Vidyapith, Hardi Bazar, Korba(C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^yr^ -^l^^ •'•'' A<' ^/w' 1. State of Chhattisgarh j Through Secretary, Department ofHigher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2.< Direetor, Higher EduGation, Directorate Raipur(C.G.) ./ „. . :. „... ; „ ... „. ' . 3. Shashtri Shikshaa Samiti, Through its Secretary,Gramya Bharti Vidyapith (Mahavidyalaya) Hardi Bazar, Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITIONUNDERARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Bi^SSffSSSKS^S^ B1181BBBBSM-® £^^:^'i^s^^:^^^^/;'.^ •.. "• 1 ::;:ii :HI<mSCOOT^ r:<MHagffiB[^2AB»;-A^^BMJiBlirati sa;-;: HiEWaia^iWimamsgRiBBU'BaiaHiMRiTO'nifft^ PETITIOMBR RESPOMDBimB ]w.p.t irof.i?S7)^i2S0itfi 'ywsua- State^tf C.G. & ©tUcrs WRITvexE^ismusax^is^waxas^Q^'c^sscivtWEKss'mw '^^itm^.i..:;.'.,::.::; :;:-: ;;.::;', ShriNeerq Cfaoubey,\CQUiiset^tfacpctitto Shri V.V.S.Moortliy, Dy. A.G. for tbe State/resps. 1 & 2. t " '. •;^<MaMBR..; , :: :' 1' .,'.'.l,,::;r..^ : ;.. ' l'~^y?'^IWB?sa3B^!'iiB?t^ipiNWiliB|aBi^ Iw is the enlph^^ of iastttution and; tUough. he is entitlcd Sar l: [tieaeStat^6a'ipsy ConiDusaion as iccotmnended by tiae CkweEtuaent fi»r the govenuiicnt employees butthe samc has not been given to Uun. AccoidJBBg to fhe petitibiicr eailier also whea the foenete of 5a Pay <3oiniixissK>n was refused to^ peraoas, writ petitions wet-e fiiled Uefoie this Oourt and uItuaEitely aflier passaig ofoider by fhis Court thc beriefit of 5il1 Pay Gonuuissioa wasgranted'tothem. i 2. CounseL for fhfi petiiHon^ sutemits fh^ e^ would be seived if at ttus ^ltage flie[petitionj^ is perinitted; to wifhdraw fUspetitic>nanti|(}aTpctipn;U!eissued N0,1 ^ decidiug t^ pMaiIiaig^ aepi^entatma of tBe petitiiwter (Annexure P/5) dated 11.6.2010. 3. &wm^ appearing ^&w fhe State subauts fhat |fhe represcntatioa has feeen rn^e by the pe'titioner dax^^ Chfcf Miruster •wtiereas gi& is requu'ed t& nmlce suitabile representation fo respondeitt N0.1; Re siitoiBffts thatifhe oasle of IHS^BIKM:Ba ;|ilj|||Bjgj| SB|||t>|i'::? ss 111 lliT II II I??.' tB^i^titioner aad ,simila^ ^©pDimissuui. is alrgady uadcr petjlatiner make a fiBsli^ decided MacCordaacewitKla'n'^ vperseiBs^s^ywislt.yE^^.Pay. eottstcteBSitajoa; ?a]Etd. ;ttt the 'aaB' tbe isamje 'miouM. ^be 4. AcoeftSxa^y, -ttoe petitioner iis iiwiiult^^te ^ petition with the a&resaM KBe^^ 6-esh representation by fbe pctitionea- 'befiare 1lie resigoiKleitt N0.1 wifhin a peiiod of one mpnttt fibm fbiie date of iEeca^itlof copy of this order, it is expected fix)m. ftie said authoi-tties to pass appiopriatc pidcr as ex^ditiou^ as possible pr^a^ wifhinaperiodoffiiuriaonth&fixnntlicdateofits^ 5. It is tnade clcar that tliis Court faas^^^i^ opinj<^ <m; meB^jof t^^ca^^ai^ ::^wouM|^e|^^liKiKiri^|^3:(|lfici?egtl^ witll'Iaw.1' "i: ;' :"1;;; :.' <:' ' • -': ~: ;_- ': : • Sd/- pritinker Diwakar Judge •~J 1\^m