li!l l^<'J!:il IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSl N0. '59^/2010 WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER -\v^\ -o \' /<<.•^^ .—"' yi^ J-\ :^ o RESPONDENTS 2. 3. 4. Munshi La! Parsai, aged about 42 years, son of Shri Raghunath Singh Parsai, occupation - Asst. Teacher, Presently Upper Division Teacher, working at Govt Middle School Dangarh, Vikas Khand - Mohala, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Asst. Commissioner, Deptt of Tribal, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) Joint Director (Treasury, A/c & -Pension), Raipur (CG) Block Education Officer, Block - Mohala, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG). 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER As per cause title. 02. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE RESPONDENTi T ^ia-'a-ssi,, y^ ~\ tt. aii^r 'vi Kiit 'tTOT 3?T^T s»i*li<^) (S) s^ '<II<<KIA|, aTil'y'ifi, fa^iyy ^.').w..^.^ls. 3H?n Tra^ (1pf3^^) wnw^tetsii^i SB : Hon uie Shri Manindra Mohian 29-07-2010 onn A.N.onaKta, counsei fd Shri vinod Tekam. r'anel 'Li neara. Learnea counsei appeanng is entitied to benefit of fvvo ad'vd passea H. i .i. exarninaiiun ueror^ submitted that th©issue Invoived integra and the sarne has been firi| in the case of Asha Saxena vs. S |for the petiuoner subniits that the petitioner |nce incrernenis on accouni OT ne naving niS appointrnent at nis o'wn cost. it is in me preseni peiiuon is nu ionger fiss nri|aiiy aeciaeu uy ine non Die oupreme ijuun ftatewM.P. & Ors.. ^Uus (iHi MFjR(SC) 53. it is furtfier subrnitteu that thi order dated 05-02-200S passec| counsel for the Detltioner further d ^s-ut-^u iu passea in wrii nppea .JL -X SA. juugmeni OT ine oupreme UOUH lil order passed by thls Court in art have been issued for consideratjon incrernenis as per cirouiar aatea Pradesh, after verification ofthe fa Learnea counsei ror ine r petitioner vrould aiso be considereti on the sarne lines in view of the statement *w[ci<il-i •w»ai-cfivSifss^K ^siRmsn^i annvasiava, j. r ine peiiiioner. wver ror ine oiaie. i ijoun nas aiso laKen a sirriiiar view in iis In W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned iraws attentlon of this Court to order dated No.124 of 2008, vvherein relying upon the tne case OT wsna saxena (supi'a) anu ine luther Vtfrit Appeai No.87/2009, directions or ti'ie case ror grant or rwo acivance :i-uy-~ia/4 issueu u'v tne otate OT Maciriv'a -A.- —E_----.-i ;is pieaaea in ine peiiiion. sspondents suurnits inat ine case OT tiie rrd3Ci6 auove, triis petition is T'naiiy aisposea off vnth a uirection to ihe respon^ent authorities to consider and decide the ^••T^iTi?—FS/147—2/2010—1,00,000. fete^t; s^T "'ii^KrP!, s'Tii'y'itc, IsKniyy :..).!^o.:..^i-?£./.^ sn^fr 'T^T (I'li^^) sn^i w R'li* wnsn^ignw TCIIW^ftg 31)^1 •^- ^.I^ - ciaim OT ine peuiioner ror grani 01 uateu 21-0&'-i974 issueu uvthe Stai the facts pieaded in the petition -with| ^i<ii<n4ii 'HF^rf ^f 'fe^t <F3j-«)< ^raffipTSil^l nro aavance incremenis as per cireuiar :e uf n4auhya Pradesh, after verification 01 n a period of eight weeks fiom today. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge 8!re^tSl*T5i«IRR:,.rp!.T-<-lhT—FS/147—2/2U10—1,00,000. 4-