u ‘Q‘v i w 9T Q3) N THE HIGH COURT HHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ’ MISC APP AL No. kizLf /2002 ' x APPEAL UNDER SECTION 30 OF THE WORKMEN'S COM- PENSATION ACT 1923. 2’}, A . 1 ABPELLANT I : Municipal Corporation, Rajnamigaon N(§)N—APPLICANT f through- Its Commissioner, Municipal f Corporation,Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS / RESPONDENT r Shantibal, wido Bhaiyalal Aged about 50 APPLICANT years R/Q Behind Ram Talkies ‘ Diwanpara, Rajnandgaon ,/' u - WWW—65W mm M A No. 42#/2002 WW ui 2w l mmmw Wamqftv? akmm 5-7-2002 I } Shri Ravindra Agrawal Advo cate for the appellant. \ t , Learned counsel for hg appella n1: states that l w £he appellant would not llk to proeeed with the appeal and would llke to withdraw "L Accordingly, the appelal l s dlsmlssed as w1thdrawn. Sd/- P.C. Naik Judge i r i *he same. l i l 1 t J l l l lthakp y m