THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No. 980 of 2011 ORDER: The respondent filed O.S.No.1244 of 2008 in the Court of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool against the petitioners for the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of the suit schedule property. Thereafter, she filed I.A.No.603 of 2010 under Rule 17 of Order VI read with Section 151 C.P.C. to permit her to amend the plaint to incorporate the prayer as to mandatory injunction. The petitioners opposed the application. The trial Court allowed the I.A. through order dated 17.02.2011. Heard Sri J. Janaki Rami Reddy learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri K. Somakonda Reddy learned counsel for the respondent. Initially, the suit was filed for the relief of perpetual injunction. In case the respondent wanted to claim the relief in the form of mandatory injunction, it was obligatory for her to claim the relief of declaration also. It is well settled principle of law that the relief of mandatory injunction cannot be claimed in the absence of any relief of declaration of rights. On this short ground the C.R.P. is allowed. Order under revision is set aside. It is, however, left open to the respondent to seek the relief of mandatory injunction as a corollary to the one of declaration of her rights, if she is so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt. 08.06.2011 lvl THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No. 980 of 2011 Dt. 08.06.2011