IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ,^'° Petitioner ^^ ^s^-" ^^y' ^:'"^" ..^ ^ Respondents 7^^ [^GO^ ..-•T^'"y D^CSi-'y^:;'J~ P^T^.^ r^< •.^•^^- W.P. ^o._^^3-/2005 GOPAL DAS GUPTA, S/o Late Shri G. L. Gupta, aged about 54 years, Occupation - Govt. Service, Deputy Secretary, Deptt. ofCommerce and Industries, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Permanent Resid^nt of - F-2/17, Shalimar Garden, Kolar Road, Bhopal (M.P.) At oresent residins at - HIG -111, Vyeta Complex, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Union of India, Through Secretary, Department of Personnel, Public Grievance & Pension, New Delhi. y. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through : The Secretary Department of General Administration (G.A.D.), Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (C.G.) /3. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary Department of General Administration (G.A.D.), Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) -2- -' /'" WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPRO- PRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CER- TIORARI AND ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. 3357 of2005 Petitioner Gopal Das Gupta Vcrsus Respondents Union oflndia &ofhers SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satisla K. Agaihotri. J Sbri Ayaj Naved, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri S. K. Beriwal^ standmg counsel for tiie Union of India/Respondent No.l. Shri S. S. Rajput, Advocate for fhe rcspoudent No,2. Shri Satish Gnpta, Deputy Govt. Advocate for fhe respondent No. 3. ORDBR { Psssed on this 18Aflay of.Janiiaiy, 2007) The foUowuig oi^der ofthe Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri^ J. 1. The petitioner has filed this petition against the maction of the respondents ia decidiiig his representatiou. 2. Shri S. K. Berm7al^ leamed counsel appearing for fhe respondent No.l/Union oflndia Tias prodiiced a lett.er dated 27th necember^ 2006^ , written by Shri Manish Mohaa, Deputy Secrctary (SR), Mmistiy of Personnel, P.G. aad Pensions Departnient of Personnel & Trainmg^ addressed to fhe petitioner, The letter is taken on record, 3. According to the letter datedl 27th Decemher^ 2006 (siipi-R) tlie Union oflndia has deckied to consider the representatiou offhe petitioner. 4. In view of fhe aforementioned, nothmg survives in fhe matter, The petitioner is at liberty to file his representation immediately/urgently, so that fhe same caa be considered aiid decided by fhe Union of India,. ss per the letter dated 27th December^ 2006 (siiprR). 5. Accordmgly, fhe matter staads disposed of as havmg become iafnictuous, Thakur Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge