0 ( A-59 % 25.08.2011 Present: Mr.C.S. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioner. +CM(M) No. 984/2011 * The order impugned before this court is the order dated 03.05.201 lvide which the application filed by the defendant Under Order 18 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code) for recall of PW1 or DW1 for further cross-examination had been declined. Record shows that PW1 had been examined and discharged on 07.11.2005; DW1 had been examined and discharged on 26.04.2010. The present application has been filed on 02.08.2011. The averments made in the present application have been perused. Ground for the recall of the PW1 and DW1 is primarily for the reason that the earlier lawyer who had examined the witnesses was an inexperienced lawyer; he could not give suggestions to the said witnesses correctly. It is for this reason that the recall is sought. The trial court had examined the provisions of Order 18 Rule 17 of the Code in the correct 6 perspective and noted that this is not purport and intent of the aforenoted statutory provision which permits the court, no doubt, to recall of witness at any stage but not for the reason as contained in the present application. Impugned order suffers from no infirmity; is dismissed. AUGUST 25, 2011/rb INDERMEET KAUR, J. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified