""^ ^: r l»,*n<fr'. sn^r^r R-ii+sn^T ) SbHitl flfel 3^'^l^lri'il, ®xfltiis,Riciwy 3TT^?T MSI<«» tlTHWI Shllth Wl; 200 Ri<>«d sn^K'wiwflfttT Appellants (Non-appiicant No.3) Respondents (Applicant No.1) (Applicant No.2) (Applicant No. 3) (Applicant No. 4) (Applicant No. 5) (Non-appiicant No.1) +i<<tci41-i WRifff tecS <Ri<<i< ^3lRlH3TI^T Uniied India Insurance Company Limited, Through : Branch Manager, United India insurance Company |Limited, T.P. Nagar, Korba, Chhattisgarh. Versus |1. Ram Das, S/o Sivcharna Das, aged about 30years, Smt. Indri Bai.W/o Ram Das, aged about 2'8years, Tribhuvan Das, S/o Ram Das, aged about 10 years, K. Ku. Sahodri, D/o Ram Oas, aged about 8 years, Ku. Savitri, D/o Ram Das, aged about 3 years, Respondsnts No. 3,4, & 5 are minors, through their natural iuardian - Father (Ram Das, respondent No.1) Alj are by Caste-Manikpuri, R/o Puta, P.O.-Morga, Block-Podi Uproa'a, Tahsii-Katghora, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh. Ashok Kumar Paii, S/o Shri Bhagwan Singh Paji, R/o Chatidih, iiiaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Driver) XI-HC-22 an^t^ii R-fi'=b3T^r »'<rogfer 9i1W fe 3^ •<ii<<i<'i<i, ®Tfl<i'i<o,RKiitfy Sii^i '<ach lliwi s»iii«n" """ """ ••••••• g^ 200 • fSre^; SII^TTOTfWHfeT (Non appiicant No. 2) (Non applicant No.4) (Non applicant No. 5) (Non applicant No. 6) Present: Shri Dashrath Gupta.coun^elfortheappellant 13.4.2007 Heard on admission. , This is the insurer's appe; passed in Claim Case No. 76/05 v| Tribunai, Korba has alfowed the ap|? +i<<Fci41-< tiiHctl ff tecA <l»i«i< ^aif^irsn^r 7. Doctor Diiip Kumar Das, S/o Shri Natwar Das, R/o Seepat Road, Apollo Hospital, Biiaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Owner) Smt. Sonkunvrar, W/o Late Sivcharan Das, aged about 50 years, 9. Savan Das, S/o Sonsai, aged about 36 years, 10. Sukharjiya.S/o Late /Sivcharan Das, aged about 32 yeafs, All the respondents No, 8 to 10 are R/o Puta, P.0. - Morga. Block - Podi Uproda, Tahsi! - Katghora, Di'strict Korba, Chhattisgarh. against the av/ard dated 5.12.2006 ^isreby legrned'Motor Accident Ciaims )!jcatjoh ofthe c'aimants underSection XI-HC-22 31I^?T?iT R-)i=b 311^1 shWfi V^3 /'. ^-^ ^" 3S?'<<l<lld''(, ®T(iy'is,(qciitty 3TT^?T M5l<t> K11MI StWI«t> ^/y?ff^-....^.y..^ raT'""r""""""""YWf •l°l'b«d, 200 140 of the Motor Vehicie Actl Rs.50,000/- to the claimants. Learned counsei for the ^ causjng accident did not have va| by the inspector of the Insurancf the notice of !earned Tribuna! ev4 has been saddtedwith the iiabilitl The objection raised bythj causing accident not tiaving valis to be established during trial by application under Section 140 eannot absolve the insurance interim compensation, We do no impugned, which calis for interfer !n the result, the appeal dismissed at the admission stag +iotfi41-1 ><i4cft ffteA<Ri«i< ^aiRtirsn^T and awarded interim compensation of )pe!lant submits that driver ofthe vehicle id driving licence as per report submitted Company and this fact was brought to ?n then the appellant/lnsurance Company of payment ofinterim compensation. appellant regarding driver ofthevehicle driving licence at the time of accident, is le appeliant and at the stage ofdeciding of the Motor Vehide Aet, the Tribuna! Qompany from the liability of payment of find any iliegality or infirmity in the order r|nce bythis Court. eing devoid of substance is liable to be itself and is accordingly dismissed. G.Minhajjudin Judge (<ft^^ )