THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.18560 of 2011 Date:09.08.2011 Between: M.V.Jagannadham ..... Petitioner AND Commissioner, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam and three others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K.Purushotham Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri N.Ranga Reddy Standing Counsel for GVMC Counsel for respondent No.2: Smt V.Preethi Reddy Standing Counsel for VUDA Counsel for respondent No.3: Sri O.Manohar Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1 in approving the building plan for construction of flats by respondent No.4 in respect of Sy.Nos.33/2, 38/2, 38/3, 39, 41/5 of Yendada Village, Chinagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, Sri N.Ranga Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, representing respondent No.1, on written instructions, submitted that so far no building plan for construction of flats in respect of Sy.Nos.33/2, 38/2, 38/3, 39, 41/5 of Yendada Village, Chinagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, has been sanctioned. From these instructions, it is evident that the petitioner filed this Writ Petition on a mere apprehension. As no building permission has been granted till now, as evident from the instructions given by the Assistant City Planner of respondent No.1-Corporaiton as noted above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as pre-mature with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy if and when building permission is granted. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.22377 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 09thAugust, 2011 DR