c^ er~o CT8, —I IN THB HQN^BLE^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Hon'ble Single Bench) Writ Petition (C) No.5?^/2009 PBTITIONER : RESPONDENTS : ^•3 ^.^ >;s^> ^y^- 's B.N. Construction through the proprietor Ashok kumar Gupta S/o Baijnath prasad Gupta aged 48 years resident of Kirandul, near steel Bridge Distt- Dantewada (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The Managerlndus Ind. Bank Limited branch Office Jagdalpur Gidam Road Jagdalpur Distt- /Bastar (C.G.) 2. The Divisional M'anager INDUS IND. BANK LIMITED Office at . Raipur G.E. Road Near c.offee House Distt- Rsdpur (C.G.) 3. The INDUS IND BANK LIMITED represented by Mr. Balavenkata Giri (Chennai) No. 115 and 116 G.N. Chetty Road T. Nagar, Chennai ^ " 4. RITESH THAKUR an employee in the vehicle Branch INDUS IND BANK LIMITED resident of Bacheli Tahsil kuwakonda Distt- ^Dantewada(C.G.) 5. The Union bf India through the secretary finance (Banking) Department ' secretariat New Delhi. , \ss r'r" i^'t3uu3; I'^hiT^.y^'.l^^' 'ri PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF MAMDAMUS PROHIBITION CIRCIORARY ETC OR ANY APPROPRIATE WRIT DIRECTION OR ORDER ^^ .A. 'ui' ' Arun HIGHCOUFH'CiFGHHATnSGARHATBILASPUR WRITPETITION(CyNQ. 5672 of 2009 Petitioner Versus ResDondents M/s B.N. Construction The Manager Indus ind. BanK Limited & Othere WRITPETmONUNDERARTICLE2260FTHECQNSTITUTIONOFINDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Safeh K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri SahfoshSahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, standing counsel for the Union oflndia. • ORDERtGRAU (Passed on 20th Day bfJlily, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to statutory forum, that may be available to him under proyisionspflaw. 2. Noobjectionfrpmotherside. 3. Itis ordered, as prayedfor. 4. Accordingty, the writ pstition is dismissed, as.withdrawnwith the aforestated liberty. SatishK.Agnihotn Judge ^K