1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRI. WRIT PETITION NO.205 of 2011 (Yeshu @ Yogesh @ Juru Manku Pada ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra and others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.A. Badar, Advocate (appointed) for the petitioner, Shri T.A. Mirza, APP for the respondents-State. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI AND M.L.TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATE : APRIL 21, 2011. Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the respondents-State. The petitioner is a convict undergoing imprisonment in Nagpur Central Prison. The grievance of the petitioner is that on every occasion whether he is acquitted or discharged in any criminal case, the police lodged a fresh FIR against him or arrested him in some other offence which is already registered due to which the petitioner continuously remains in custody. The petitioner has sought the details of the cases which are pending against him in which he has not been arrested so far. In view of the grievance of the petitioner, the Superintendent of Police, Gadchiroli was directed to file an affidavit. He filed affidavit stating therein that no other case is pending against the petitioner. Hence, no further directions are necessary. Writ petition is disposed of. 2 The learned appointed Advocate for the petitioner be paid fees as per rules. Office to communicate this order to the petitioner, who is in Nagpur Central Prison JUDGE JUDGE pma