IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2010 / 20TH ASWINA 1932 RP.No. 888 of 2010(G) -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.6365/2007 Dated 10/07/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------------------------- SYNDICATE BANK, PAYYANNUR BRANCH, PAYYANNUR REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER AND PRINCIPAL OFFICER. BY ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS ----------------------------------------------- 1. P.T.KARUNAKARAN NAMBIR, S/O. M.P.KARUNAKARAN, KANKOLE AMSOM DESOM, KALEESWARAM.P.O., KANKOLE, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT-670141. 2. P.PARVATHI, W/O. P.T.KARUNAKARAN NAMBIAR KANKOLE AMSOM DESOM, KALEESWARAM, P.O., KANKOLE TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT-670141. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P. 888 OF 2010 IN W.P.C. NO. 6365 OF 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 12th day of October, 2010 O R D E R This review petition is filed against the order of this Court in W.P.C.6365/07. The said writ petition was dismissed but it was observed “at the same time so far as interest is concerned, I think nothing has become final till this date and the Court before allowing the interest or the rate of interest should hear both sides and incorporate the same in the judgment and decree.” The original judgment in the operative portion paragraph 2 last sentence is to the effect that “the Bank is directed to furnish statement of account calculating the interest on the basis of the above directions within a period of one month from the date of this judgment.” I am informed that in accordance with the directions statements were filed and it has been incorporated in Ext.A5 R.P. 888 OF 2010 IN W.P.C. NO. 6365 OF 2007 -:2:- decree. Since it has already been incorporated and as it was not brought to my notice the observation was made by me in the judgment. Now it requires correction. Therefore I clarify that though there is a direction by me to that effect since there had been a compliance of that direction even prior to the passing of the order, nothing need to be further done as stated in the judgment. Clarified accordingly. The R.P. is disposed of as stated above. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-