1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.2721 OF 1992. WRIT PETITION NO.2721 OF 1992. WRIT PETITION NO.2721 OF 1992. Sachin Sahakari Grihanirman Sanstha Maryadit : Petitioner. versus Shri G.T.Sangle (Since deceased) Smt.Yamunabai G. Sangle & ors. : Respondents. Mr.A.G.Pandit for the petitioner. Mr.S.D.Mogre for the respondents. WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2387 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2387 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2387 OF 2006 Shri G.T.Sangle (since deceased) Smt.Yamunabai G. Sangle & ors. : Applicants. versus Sachin Sahakari Grihanirman Saunstha Maryadit : Respondents. Mr.S.D.Mogre for the applicants. Mr.A.G.Pandit for the respondents. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE, J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE, J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE, J. 2 2 2 DATED : October 18, 2006. DATED : October 18, 2006. DATED : October 18, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The advocates for the petitioner and respondents are present. Secretary of the petitioner and Respondent No.1(c) are present. Both the advocates have filed consent terms duly signed by the secretary of the petitioner and Respondent No.2 and their respective advocates. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The advocate for the petitioner states that the respondent has paid to the petitioner as mentioned in the consent terms. In view of the consent terms, the petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged. 2. So far as Civil Application 2387 of 2006 is concerned, it is for restoration of the petition pursuant to the order dated 20th September 2006. However, there is no such order of dismissal of the petition dated 20th September 2006. As such, the application does not survive. It is disposed of. [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.] [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.] [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.]