1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application No.2593 of 2009 In Writ Petition No.2514 of 2009 (Satchikitsa Prasarak Mandal and another v. The Maharashtra University of Health Sciences and others) (Applicant : Dr. Mrs. Zehra F. Haq) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri Kadu, Advocate for Applicant/Respondent No.4. Shri G.R. Agrawal, Advocate for Petitioners. Smt. T.D. Khade, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 16, 2009. The applicant/respondent No.4 points out that fresh appointments are being made by the petitioners and hence the petitioner-Management needs to be restrained. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the advertisement has been challenged in other writ petition by moving civil application by other employees and there this Court has permitted the Management to proceed with the recruitment, but has directed that the appointments/selections, if any, shall be subject to the result of the petition. The learned counsel for the applicant/respondent No.4 states that same order should be passed in the present matter also. In view of the order already passed, it is apparent that the appointment/selection, if any, made in response to 2 the advertisement in question in place of respondent No.4 shall be subject to further orders in the matter by this Court. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the said appointment being made is purely temporary. The statement is taken on record. The civil application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE pdl.