IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 224 of 2007 (S/B) (Old No. 43606/1998) Ashok Kumar Singh S/o Late Sri Siddhanath Singh At present posted as Trade Tax Officer, Grade II, Haldwani, District Nainital. …..Petitioner Versus 1. U.P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad through its Chairman, 2. State of U.P., Department of Personnel-IV, Through its Secretary. 3. Trade Tax Commissioner, U.P. Lucknow. 4. The Director, National Savings, U.P. Lucknow. …..Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr. Lalit Belwal, Advocate for respondent No. 1 Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Brief Holder for respondents Nos. 2 to 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) None for the petitioner. Mr. Lalit Belwal, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Brief Holder for respondents Nos. 2 to 4. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. The writ petition therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 23.12.1998 stands vacated automatically. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 10.12.2007 10.12.2007 G