WP(C) 6070/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. GOSWAMI Heard Mr. B.K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.J. Ghos h, learned Government Advocate, Assam appearing for respondents no. 1,2, 3 and 4 . The petitioner claims himself to have an adopted daughter by the name of Smt. Ri na Rajkhowa, who is aged about 26 years. It is submitted by Mr. Das that the petitioner had lodged an information with th e Officer-in-Charge, Maligaon out post on 19/7/2011 with regard to abduction of his adopted daughter as well as compelling her to engage in illicit relationship . Thereafter, the petitioner was informed that it is only the Jalukbari Police S tation which has the jurisdiction to entertain the complaint and it is in such c ircumstances, the petitioner approached the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup by filing petition No.2081 C/2011 praying for a direction to the respondent No.4 to register a case under appropriate provisions. It is the c ontention of the petitioner that notwithstanding an endorsement made by the lear ned CJM on 1/8/2011 itself, no case was registered by the respondent No.4, who i s the Officer-in-charge, Jalukbari Police station. Having no alternative, the pe titioner also submitted a representation on 2/9/2011 before the respondent No.3, Superintendent of Police, City, Kamrup (M) for issuance of appropriate direction to the Officer-in-charge, Jalukbari Police Station. Mr. Das submits that till date, there is no response from the authorities and no case has yet been registered. Mr. Das also makes a limited prayer that the petitioner will be satisfied if a d irection is issued to the respondent No.3 to consider and pass appropriate order s on the representation dated 2/9/2011 (Annexure D to the writ petition). Mr. B.J. Ghosh, learned Govt. Advocate does not oppose the limited prayer made by the petitioner. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of r elief sought for, it is not considered necessary by this Court to issue notice t o the respondents 5 and 6. Considering the matter in its entirety and after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the responde nt No.3 to pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 2/9/2011 (Annexur e D to the writ petition) within a period of 10 (ten) days from today and also t o communicate to the writ petitioner the order passed. A copy of this order be furnished to Mr. B.J. Ghosh, learned Govt. Advocate for apprising the respondent No.3 of this order.