IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 408 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 17 OF 2009 MR. WILSON J. BRAGANZA ... Applicant Versus THE STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 24 ORS., ... Respondents Mr.. M. S. Joshi, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. V. Rodrigues, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent Nos.1,2,3,6, and 7. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for the Respondent No.5. Coram:- A. S. OKA & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 8th July, 2010 P.C.:- Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant and the learned Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.1,2,3,6 and 7. The order dated 17th May, 2010 annexed to the application shows that the compliance has been made with the statement of the concerned Respondents recorded by this Court in order dated 19th January, 2009. 2. The learned Additional Government Advocate states that the order dated 17th May, 2010 could not be executed as a Writ Petition has been preferred for challenging the said order before this Court. He is unable to make a statement whether there is any interim relief granted in the said Writ Petition. If there is no interim relief granted which has the effect of staying the operation of an order dated 17th May, 2010, the authority concerned will proceed to execute the order dated 17th May, 2010. 3. As far as prayer (b) of the application is concerned, we find that there is substantial compliance with order dated 19th January, 2009. If the Applicant has any grievance about the decision taken by the authority, it is for the Applicant to adopt an appropriate remedy. With the aforesaid directions, we dispose of the Misc. Civil Application. A. S. OKA, J. F. M. REIS, J. at*