HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD O.S.A.No. 23 of 2011 Date: 23-03-2011 Between: B. Sudhakar and others ……. Appellants and State of Andhra Pradesh and others ……… Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD O.S.A.No. 23 of 2011 ORDER: (Per BPR, J) This appeal is at the instance of the applicants, which is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, inter alia, seeking to assail the correctness of the orders passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in Application No.1221 of 2010, dated 09-02-2011, wherein by invoking the inherent powers under Section 151 of C.P.C. they sought a direction to the Sub-Registrar, Kukatpally, to register the final decrees, which are given in document Nos.P-291/2010 and P-292/2010 and forward the same to this Court. The learned single Judge, while disposing of the said application, directed the appellants to furnish bank guarantee, which is subject to the result of the Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.20268-20269/2010 pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Having heard the learned counsel on either side and also on perusal of the material on record, there is no dispute in regard to the final decrees, which are passed by this Court, and it is those decrees which the parties sought for registration. Even though the learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the special leave petition filed by the Government before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in pursuance of these proceedings has been admitted and the stay petition is pending, however the fact remains that no interim order or stay whatsoever in nature is granted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and especially there being no interim order or stay as such granted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, inspite of the fact that the appellants might have given the letter on 10-01-2011 offering to furnish bank guarantee in the exigency, we are of the view that there is no requirement as such to warrant furnishing of bank guarantee. The Appeal is, accordingly, allowed and the impugned order in Application No.1221 of 2010, dated 09-02-2011, only to the extent of directing the appellants to furnish bank guarantee, is set aside. We also reiterate that any steps taken in pursuance of this order would be subject to the result of the aforesaid appeal pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. No order as to costs. _________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J __________________ P. DURGA PRASAD, J Date: 23-03-2011 YCR