(L^ ^y^_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT^ILASPUR W. P. (Sl No. S^ ^O) OF 2010. PETITIONERS ^y. ^^'^-•l^ ^.••"/^"<^ ^sy ^y '^ '^":i,.^ -—^^ ^ !v °e T8,u^'y <.y-- '^ :1. Umesh Kumar Yadu, S/o. late Shri Manju Ram Yadu, aged about 31 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, R/o. Ward No. 17, Gariyabandh, Tahsil Gariyabandh, District Raipur (C. G.) 2. Lakhan Lal Baghel, S/o. late Shri Jivrakhan Lal Baghel, aged about 30 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, R/o. Ward No. 17, Gariyabandh, Tahsil Gariyabandh, District Raipur (C. G.) 3. Hemant Kumar Dau, ^ S/o. late Shri Dayalu Rpam Dau, aged about 32 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, Govt. High School, Piparchhedi, Block Gariyabandh, Tahsil Gariyabandh, District Raipur (C. G.) 4. Jag Jeevan Ram Jangde, S/o. late Shri Mahettar Lal Jangde, aged about 30 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, R/o. Village Nara, Post Bhansoj, Police Station Mandir Hasaud, Block Arang, District Raipur (C. G.) y VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of General Adrainistration Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) / 3. The Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4. District Education officer, Raipur, Disttict Raipur (C. G.) /5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Gariyaband, District Raipur (C.G.) /6. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Arang, District Raipur (C.G.) ^. WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -HC—78 an^I^iTTS^ imta^gnw ^•ul,fV^-'^ 'S^I -*\WW^, •9-^VI'c, |a)diy^< __^,(S-)t^.^^j\9 ^^^•••••••••••••^•-——j-- STI^I TRR? (•'pf^qqtt) ?^nw ^ifef ai^r SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrilfastawa. J ^l^iA-T 'HTO^tf ^ fS11^t <f^-(^l< ^afRitiani^! 15-B7-2010 Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for tl|ie petitionere. Shri A|it Singh, Panel Lawyer for tt^ State on advance copy. Heard. The petitioners have fited this petifon on the ground that they are wards of Assistant Teachers who died while in ^ervice. They moved an application for compassfonate appointment and they ha\^e been given appointment on the post ofShiksha Karmi Grade III. The petitioner^ submitted thatthey are entitled <D be appointed as Assistant Teacher according]te) the policy. Learned State counsel submitted tfiat for the present, the petitioners may be given an opportunity offiling the detail^d representatfon before tt>e competent respondentauthority, which may be consiflered on te own mwits, in accordance with law. Having considered and without ei( the case, in the opinion of this Court, endj is given to the petitkiners to make a grievances before the competent responi|ent authority atong with a copy of the petition and this order, within sc< weeks f(om today, and on such representation being fited, the competent respondent auttiority shall decide the same on its own possible preferably within a period of (e represenlation. If any grievance still meriis in accordance with law as early a4 four months from the date of receipt of tlj pressing any opinion on the merits of ofjustice will be served, if a direction detailed representation raising their remains, the petitioners nnay avail the rennjsdy available underthe law. With the aforesaid obser^ation this pelition stands disposed of. Consequentiy, interlocutory applications, ijiending ifany, also stand disposed of. Certified copy as per rutes. Sd/- ,^.M^—