{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.9070 OF 2010 Gulam Dastgir Daud Ansari and others Petitioners Versus Kazi Abdul Samad Abdul Haquim and others Respondents Mr.S.S.Jadhavar, advocate for petitioners Mr.V.D.Salunke, advocate for Respondents No.1 to 6. Mr.N.N.Jadhav, A.G.P for respondents no.7 & 8. CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 13 th October, 2010 PER COURT: 1 The order passed by Ad hoc District Judge-2, Osmanabad on 29.04.2010 in Misc. Civil Appeal No.59/2010 is subjected to challenge in this petition. 2 It is observed by the Court in the order itself that both the advocates representing the parties have presented a pursis expressing their willingness to argue the matter in summer vacation and till then the Court has restrained both the parties from taking policy decision and to withdraw Government funds. {2} However, it appears that the matter was not argued as agreed before the Court. 3 In these circumstances, in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution, no interference is called for in the interlocutory order passed by the Court. The parties are free to make request to the District Court for expeditious disposal of pending matter. 4 Writ Petition stands rejected. R.M.BORDE JUDGE adb/wp907010