IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM NO. 21740-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION. 21.11.2006. Braham Dutt and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT Mr.K. K. Aggarwal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kapil Aggarwal, Advocate. Mr. Narender Sura, AAG, Haryana. AJAI LAMBA , J( Oral ). This is a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for bail in a case lodged under Sections 323, 324, 452, 326/ 34 IPC. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent on instructions from Inspector Raghbir Singh states that challan has already been presented in this case and therefore, at this stage there is no occasion for taking the petitioners on police remand. Considering the stage of the case, the petition is allowed. Order dated 20th April, 2006 is hereby made absolute and it is directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting / Investigating Officer, subject to the following conditions:- i) the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required; ii) the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and iii) the petitioners shall not leave India without the previous CRM NO.21740-M of 2006 -2- permission of the court. This order shall enure till 10 days after the petitioners receives a notice of filing of final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C , within which period the petitioners would be at liberty to apply for regular bail. November21,2006 ( AJAI LAMBA ) mamta JUDGE