IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.5000 of 2009 Decided on : 02.09.2009 Hari Singh ... Petitioner versus Smt. Anita Bhargav & another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. R.D.Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed against the order dated 19.08.2009 passed by the Trial Court, rejecting the application for leading additional evidence. The plaintiff had filed suit claiming that he had become owner by adverse possession of specific property No.7433 to 7435 situated in Rewari. The petitioner led no evidence despite the grant of various opportunities and ultimately his evidence was closed by order dated 19.08.2009. That order was never challenged by the petitioner. Thereafter the respondents led their evidence. When the case was fixed for final stage the present application was moved stating that the number of properties was not 7433 to 7435 but was actually 7427 to 7429 and therefore the petitioner be permitted to summon the concerned official of the Municipal Committee to prove his case. CR No.5000 of 2009 -2- It is this application, which has been declined both on the grounds of delay as well as on the ground that this was merely a device to get over the earlier order of closure of evidence. I find no infirmity in the order of the Trial Court. Consequently, this revision petition is dismissed. No costs. September 2, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE