:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3439 OF 1994 Tukaram Ramchandra Chavan (Wasamkar), ..Petitioner Vs Shivram Ramchandra Wasamkar (Chavan) and ors. ..Respondents Mr N.J.Patil, for the petitioner. Mr G.S.Godbole, for respondent nos 1 to 4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. : D.B.BHOSALE,J. : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE DATE DATE : FEBRUARY 23, 2005. : FEBRUARY 23, 2005. : FEBRUARY 23, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner’s application seeking appointment of a court commissioner for local investigation of the suit property and to bring on record the exact status of the property at the relevant time was rejected by the impugned order dated 29.3.1994. That application was filed stating that since there was no standing crop at the relevant time, it was easy to carry out the work of court commissioner. I perused the application as also the order by which the application has been rejected. The application was absolutely vague and, therefore, it has been rightly rejected by the trial Court. Moreover, the party cannot seek an appointment of a :2: :2: :2: court commissioner to collect evidence. I find no reason to interfere with the order impugned in the present petition. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is dismissed as such. Rule is discharged. The interim order stands vacated. (D.B.Bhosale, (D.B.Bhosale, (D.B.Bhosale, J.) J.) J.)