IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9205 of 2011 RENU DEVI, WIFE OF DILIP GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 30.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Admittedly, the victim has returned to her home safely on the very next day of the alleged occurrence and her statement was recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. on 21.04.2010 i.e. after four days of her return. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there was love affair between the victim and son of this petitioner and the statement of victim, recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., is nothing but only a tutored statement. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Madhepura (Barrahi) P.S. Case No. 139 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )