mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1428 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1687 OF 2008 Maruti Vithoba Jadhav Applicant versus Vithoba Hiraji Jadhav Respondent Ms.Tanmai Gadre i/by Nitin P. Deshpande for applicant. I.M.Vohra i/by Bipin Joshi for respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 21st July 2009 PC :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. As the respondent was already represented by an advocate in the main writ petition, the writ petition could not have been dismissed on account of non service of notice. Hence, a case for restoration is made out. The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (A.S.OKA, J.) mst FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1687 OF 2008 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Ms.Tanmai Gadre i/by Nitin P. Deshpande for applicant. I.M.Vohra i/by Bipin Joshi for respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 21st July 2009 PC :- 1. The advocate for the respondent states that he waives service of Rule. As respondent is stated to be a senior citizen, hearing of the writ petition is expedited. It is clarified that even the interim relief granted earlier stands restored. (A.S.OKA, J.)