7 Ser. Date Order with Signature Office Note as to No. of action (if any) Orde quer taken on Order '0.22.7.I WP /C` No.14/05 8 Present: Mr. D.R. Thapa, Advocate for the Petitioners.Mr.S.P.Wangdi, Advocate General with Mr. J.B. Pradhan, Govt. Advocate for the State-Respondents. Mr. A.Moulik, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kessang Diki Bhutia, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 4 to 17.Forthesamereasonsasgiven in the earlier case, this wit petition which is very similar to the earlier one is also dismissed without any order as to costs.Wewouldonlyaddthat if any order is passed in a writ petition of this nature the result would be an alteration of the status-quo, which means that some regularly working Government employees will have to be thrown out and the posts put up for fresh selections. No doubt it can be done in an appropriately constituted public interest litigation where the facts and the law justify such a course. But without the strongest of reasons no Court of Law will un-employ employed persons in this country of sparse employments. `A'"'ff:fi- (A.P. Subba, J)