IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32109 of 2009 SUNIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY @ SUNIL CHOUDHARY Son of Kapildeo Chaudhary, R/o Barun, P.S. Barun, Dist. Kaimur at Bhabua …Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 15.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Offences alleged are under sections 17, 18, 21, 22, 27 and the N.D.P.S. Act. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and is in custody since 16.1.2007. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State opposed the bail application and submits that the co-accused Gulabchand Sah during investigation has stated that the heroin in question was purchased by the petitioner. It further appears that the petitioner has criminal antecedent with respect to the same nature. Considering the nature of the allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. It is further submitted that the trial has commenced. However, if the trial of the case is no concluded within six months from the date of this order, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J) M.Rahman