HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.24851 of 2011 Date: September 06, 2011 Between: Kamireddi Achiyya Naidu … Petitioner And 1. The Superintendent of Police, Rural, Visakhapatnam & 4 others. … Respondents * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.24851 of 2011 O R D E R: A writ of Mandamus sought for by the petitioner is for directing respondents 1 to 4 to take action against the fifth respondent on the ground that the fifth respondent is resorting to criminal activities apart from land grabbing. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner is however unable to show any legal right on the part of the petitioner in setting in motion either any civil action or criminal action. The petitioner, apparently, has not even filed a complaint against the fifth respondent. However on the basis of a representation said to have been given by him to the Superintendent of Police dated 27th June 2011 the petitioner seeks that respondents 1 to 4 should take appropriate criminal action against the fifth respondent on the ground that he is a problematic man in the locality and he is acting against social justice. 3. The representation of the petitioner itself shows that the petitioner himself was an accused in a criminal case filed by the fifth respondent against him which has since been closed on the ground of mistake of fact. 4. The affidavit of the petitioner and the contentions of the learned counsel merely show that they want to set criminal law into motion against the fifth respondent by invoking extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Without even filing a complaint for the alleged acts of the fifth respondent, this writ petition is not tenable and is thoroughly misconceived. 5. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ____________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J Date: September 06, 2011. BSB