IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M- 29724 of 2010 Date of Decision: 19.01.2011 Parampal Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mrs. B.P.K. Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Nehra, Addl.A.G. Punjab. NAWAB SINGH.J (ORAL) Parampal Singh – petitioner was convicted under Sections 420, 461, 471 and 473 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay fine of Rs.500/- with default stipulation by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ferozepur, by judgment dated August 4 th, 1999 in case bearing First Information Report No. 62 dated April 1 st, 1988 registered against him in Police Station Guru Harsahai. 2. By filing this petition, petitioner seeks the benefit of remissions for the period he remained on bail. 3. In Joginder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2001 (4) Recent Criminal Reports (Criminal) 341, the Hon`ble Supreme Court has held that the accused, who was on bail during the period when remissions were granted, is not entitled to the benefit of remissions. In view of the above, the petition is devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed. 19.01.2011 (NAWAB SINGH) som JUDGE