T XI-HC—78 'S^ '^wm^, ^•^w\<o, (sKii^iy 11HCTI «t*11<») "•^200 3?H^?T <<?5R5> ( ysl^^) "TOT 3?n^?T ^^ien -1-. ^ ftBSPQNDENTS 1. ^ ?^WT^lf^ S^l coiitempt case (ua^iij NO« UT oyizuuy ETITIONER SATISH KUR SHRI JAN. WORKING fi. SCHOOC, l VILLAGE B RAIGARH (C Versu 2. 3. SHRI THAKU TRIBLE CA DEVELOPME] DISTRICT RA] DR. LAl COMMISSION TRIBLE CA DEVELOPME] DISTRICT RA] SHRITEEKAF GOVT. HR. TAMNAR, DIS Cont^mpt Petitiosa^sider Article read with Section 12 ofthe C< .B Hoa'ble Shri Dhirendra Mishi 1.1.2009 Mr. RK Keshanvaai, leam.ed o Heard on IA No,01,applicatio3 The appUcation is aUowed a v(7itlidraw fhis petition, Accorduigly, fhe petitiou is dis cfti^i<?i<iSi ^i^<nT'^ 'fe^st <Riii^i< ^>3:?RFT3^T IAR PATEL, AGED 32 YEARS, S/0 \K RAM PATEL, PRESENTLY S FARRASH, AT GOVT. HR. SEC. IRBA, DISTRICT RAIGARH R/0 LJDIYA, VIA TAMNAR, DISTRICT S) .s R RAM SINGH, THE COLLECTOR, .STE & SCHEDULE CASTE ^T DEPARTMENT, RAIGARH, GARH (CG) IT SHUKLA, ASSISTANT ER, OFFICE OF THE COLLECTOR, STE 6& SCHEDULE CASTE ^T DEPARTMENT, RAIGARH, GARH (CG) :AM PATEL, INCHARGE PRINCIPAL, SEC. SCHOOL URBA, BLOCK TRICT RAIGARH (CG) 215 of the Cpastitution pf India nteiiipt ofCourts Act^ 1971. •a.J ^unsel for tfie petitioner, for wifhdrawal of tlie petition. ^id tiie petitioner is permitted to Iniissed as wittidrawn, ^'MteWa obtees" li