IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 12580 of 2009 Between: Ramireddy Konda Reddy S/o. Chenna Reddy R/o. D.No. 2-123, Kondapeta Village, Bainapalli Vuruf Kondapeta Village, Chennur Mandal, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Thasildar, Chennur Mandal, Kadapa District. 2 Gaddam Subbamma W/o. Gaddam Jeeva R/o. Kondapeta Village, Bainapalli @ Kondapeta Village, Chennur Mandal, Kadapa District. 3 Gaddam Danamakka W/o. Puroshatham R/o. Kondapeta Village, Bainapalli @ Kondapeta Village, Chennur Mandal, Kadapa District. 4 Dalai Keshamma W/o. Chinnanna R/o. Kondapeta Village, Bainapalli @ Kondapeta Village, Chennur Mandal, Kadapa District. 5 Gaddam Kamalamma W/o. Puroshatham R/o. Kondapeta Village, Bainapalli @ Kondapeta Village, Chennur Mandal, Kadapa District. 6 Gaddam Salamma W/o. Naganna R/o. Kondapeta Village, Bainapalli @ Kondapeta Village, Chennur Mandal, Kadapa District. 7 Gaddam Sugunamma W/o. Bhaskar R/o. Kondapeta Village, Bainapalli @ Kondapeta Village, Chennur Mandal, Kadapa District. 8 Ganta Chinnakka W/o. Yesu R/o. Kondapeta Village, Bainapalli @ Kondapeta Village, Chennur Mandal, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned notice dt. 01.04.2009 issued by the 1st respondent in directing the petitioner to give rasta through his land in Sy.No.141-1A3 situated at Bainapalli @ Kondapeta Village, Chennur Mandal, Kadapa District, to the respondents 2 to 8 land in Sy.No.144/1 even though already there is an existing / approaching rasta to their land, further not to interfere with the works of the respondents 2 to 8, as illegal, arbitrary, in gross violation of principles of natural justice ad violative of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the aforesaid impugned notice issued by the 1st respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.DHARMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 12580 of 2009 14-07-2009 Oral Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the impugned and perverse notice issued by the 1st respondent dated 01-04-2009 has since been withdrawn. In the circumstances, no further proceedings are warranted. The writ petition is dismissed as ‘infructuous’. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 14-07-2009 Pvks