C-482 No. 269 of 2010 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Gopal Krishan, Advocate present for the petitioner. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder present for the State. Ms. Rachna Gandhi (complainant) is also present, in person. Heard learned counsel for the parties and the complainant. By means of this petition, moved under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner (complainant) has sought quashing of the proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 44 of 2009; State Vs. Nitin Rathore and others, relating to offences punishable under Section 498-A, 323, 328, 506 of I.P.C., and one punishable under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, police station Kashipur (arisen out of Crime No. 775 of 2004), pending in the court of Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar. Brief facts of the case are that the complainant (present petitioner) got married to respondent No. 2 Vipin Kumar on 12.12.2002, at Haridwar. However, after sometime the matrimonial relations between the two started souring, and criminal cases were instituted by the present petitioner / complainant against Vipin Kumar Singh (respondent No. 2), and his other relations. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that now the petitioner / complainant has entered into compromise with the present respondents No. 2 to 6 and she does not want to prosecute the criminal case against them. Copy of the compromise has been filed as Annexure –1 to the affidavit filed with the petition, which is verified by the complainant herself before this Court. Said compromise has already been accepted by Judge, Family Court, Haridwar, in respect of other dispute pending before said court. In the above circumstances, in view of principle of law laid down in B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana (2003) 4 Supreme Court Cases 675, this petition deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, the petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., filed by the complainant herself, is allowed and the proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 44 of 2009; State Vs. Nitin Rathore and others, relating to offences punishable under Section 498-A, 323, 328, 506 of I.P.C., and one punishable under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, police station Kashipur (arisen out of Crime No. 775 of 2004), pending in the court of Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, ed. are hereby quash (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 31.03.2010 HN