ww g“LL" m p47 -. .. IE THE EIGH COURT OF MADEYA PRAESH AT ABAL M.P.No. ‘1‘??? /1 992 PE£I TIDNEB Ramdham. A :awal S/o Pyare Lal Agxewal, aged about #7 yea1€, Oceapation Cultiaauon msident of Village Budeli tamil Sarangarh aistxiet Raigarh (M.P.) Vers us A J ' o 5&1? cf Madhya Pradesh Thmugh Sub mviQional Officer (Revenue) Sarengéwh digtrict aai gs rh (M P.) g 2a Tahslldar Saxanga rh mistrut Baigarh (Mm. g 3. Shri J.IJ.Shuk1a the than Naib 1ahsilder ,sarengarh RFsPONDENTS (in 1982 to 1981+) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/222 QF TIE CONSTITUTimi OF Inn FOR A mm: IN THE NATmggF cggggmm ,MANQgMUs ETC AN FOR AROPRIE EUFER DIREONS TTJ‘ a M ' $ PPAT R CTI 28‘é—2005 Shri 8D. Guru, counsel f0 Shri Sunil OTweni, Pane! 1. .awyer for ‘rhe' $fa+e/x*espondenf5 No.1 and 2. Heard bofh The counseL fiied on behalf-of Jrhe Smfe. ‘50 far no reTurn has been 3y ’rhis pe‘rh‘ionfiied und‘ :r Ar‘ficle 226/227 0f fhe CV”. am‘rion ques+ion The !egcdi-Ty, pmprie‘fy and cg'recTness ofThe show cause noTice Annexure—P/§ whereby The Sub D‘ivisicnal Officer, Saranggarh asked The peTiTioner ‘ herein To show cause as To why he shouki noT e senT To civil jail for noT vacoTing The iand which has been encrodched, pon by him. ’of India The peT§Ti0ner seeks Leohned coLmsel for- The peTiTioner submiTs ThaT The peTiTioner was in possession of ThaT iond s nce 1982 and The PaTTa was also issued in “favour of The iSeTiTioner in Th been issued. Learned counsel ai: Annexur‘eP/b has aih’eady be Annexure-P/i filee primer-Hy chalienging The noTice t This peTifion' .ha‘s been cw has been filed by The pe’rihener. s, The peTiTioner shouid appear before I The pe‘i’i'fioner. year 1981-82 and even Then no’rice has :o submifs *‘rha? The repiy ih The farm of en filedfin response To The nofice SP/FS/2005 - 20,000 Annexure-P/E and reply To Th Therefore, in The circumsTance x Wmm.$ ..........I...I..................... mzoo ['mwmaafaw) V ammésrm atmtéwhs ’ a mmmauéew _ F’ ’ WWE’WWW $Ws®a "rhe 5.13.0. Saranggarh and fiie fhe documeMs showing his possassion cmd én‘i‘i‘flemenf m respecf of The, iand in quesfion. The ~5.D.O. fro decide ‘rha mm’mr on ifs own merit in v 5w of fhe repiy and documen‘i’s filed by ‘i‘he pe‘rh‘iomr herein cmé pass apPorop‘riaie order in accordance wi‘fh law. l ' Tiii ihe order is passec‘i -by +he SDO. afier heurimg fhe ' i pefifiener, The pefi’rimer sif‘ioukz‘ nofbe dispossessed from The iand iza ' v ques-‘iian. En view of ihe above, fhe ge‘ri‘rion s‘i‘ands dispcsed of. , Pam‘ies are em‘ified far ce “Tified copy of fhis order. / # i Sdl- ’ r L_c.BHAD00 Judge / SP/FS/2005 - 20,000 ‘ 1.. m