IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2009 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 28745 of 2009(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------- K.K.SASEENDRAN,S/O. KUMARAN (LATE) KANDANCHIRAYIL, 14TH MILE, VALARA P.O., ADIMALI, IDUKKI DIST. BY ADV. SRI.V.K.SUNIL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDYUTHI BHAVANM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPRUAM. 2. SPECIAL THAHSILDAR (LA) K.S.E.B.L.A. OFFICE, MOOLAMATTOM 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DIVISION OFFICE K.S.E.B. KATTAPPANA. 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL MAJOR SECTION, CHITHIRAPURAM, ADIMALI. ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R1 TO 4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 28745 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 28th October, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner's grievance in this writ petition is that from the property which belonged to the petitioner's late father, which devolved on the petitioner and others, trees have been cut for drawing a 11 KV electricity line, for which the petitioner nor his father had been given any compensation. According to the petitioner, the trees were cut as early as in the year 1997 and in spite of several representations, no orders have been passed in respect of the compensation payable to the petitioner. 2. The contention of the learned standing counsel for the Kerala State Electricity Board is that despite Ext. P3 public notice, neither the petitioner's father nor the petitioner has produced the documents necessary for considering the petitioner's claim. The petitioner submits that Ext. P4 certificate regarding their title has been produced before the 3rd respondent and no orders have been passed on Ext. P5 representation filed in this regard. Having heard both sides, I direct the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P5 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, which shall include opportunity to produce necessary documents in support of the claim of the petitioner. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.