[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION W.P.NO.2421 OF 1989 Dee Cee International ..Petitioner Vs. The Textile Commissioner Govt. of India and Ors. ..Respondents ... None for Petitioner None for Respondents ... CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : JUNE 6, 2006 DATE : JUNE 6, 2006 DATE : JUNE 6, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. None present for the petitioner when the matter is called out. 2. This petition was admitted as the issue was similar to that in Writ Petition No.2420 of 1989. An appeal was preferred against an interim order passed in the said Writ Petition by the learned single Judge. The appeal was allowed and Textile Commissioner was permitted to enforce the Bank Guarantee. When the matter came up before this Court on 23.12.1999, a statement was recorded on behalf of the counsel for the Respondents that [-2-] nothing survives in that petition as the matter involved enforcement of the Bank Guarantee and accordingly, rule was discharged. 3. Considering the facts of Writ Petition No. 2420 of 1989 as the Textile Commissioner was allowed to enforce the Bank Guarantee, in our opinion, a similar order will have to be passed in this case also, as the learned Judge had only admitted the petition in view of admission of the Writ Petition No.2420 of 1989. In the light of that, rule discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. [ F.I.REBELLO, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]