IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY & THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.6120 of 1999 Between: A.Visalakshi ..... PETITIONER AND The Commissioner of Collegiate Education, A.P.Hyderabad and 3 others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.6120 of 1999 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) Heard both the counsel. The petitioner filed this writ petition on the presumption that the 4th respondent who is also working as a part time lecturer is likely to be transferred to the 2nd respondent college where she is working as a part time lecturer. Counter has been filed stating that the petitioner filed this writ partition only on the assumption that the 4th respondent who is working in another college as part time lecturer is sought to be shifted to the 2nd respondent college, but the 4th respondent was not shifted to the 2nd respondent college in the place of the petitioner. No material is placed before us to show that the 1st respondent transferred or was trying to transfer the 4th respondent to the 2nd respondent college in the place of the petitioner. The writ petition is not maintainable on mere allegations without filing any piece of material with regard to the allegations made in the writ affidavit. The writ petition is devoid of any merits, and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J __________________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY,J ___________________________ VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR,J Dated: 12.10.2009 Dsr