1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Fourth Bail Application No. 9337/2010 Ajad Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 21.10.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Manish Gupta - for the petitioner Mr Peeyush Kumar, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after rejection of earlier bail application statements of material witnesses have been recorded and they have been declared hostile. Basically, prosecution case has not been supported by the material witnesses. Since trial is likely to take time thus present bail application has been moved. Co-accused was also granted benefit of bail. Hence, petitioner may also be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is 2 directed that accused-petitioner namely; Ajad may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 365/2008 registered at Police Station – Tapukara, Alwar for offence under Section/s 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 324, 307 and 302 IPC provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma