IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.19109 -M of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : JULY 7, 2011 SUNITA RANI & ANR. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. JS Saneta, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. BS Saini, Sr. DAG, Haryana. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) This petition filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, alleges that the petitioners are major in age and, therefore, got married, however, against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 8. As such, the petitioners apprehend threat to their life and liberty. Reply on behalf of the respondent-State has been filed in court today, which is taken on record. From para-4 of the reply, it is brought out that the private respondents have been contacted and they have stated that they have no concern with Sunita Rani (petitioner No.1), who has performed marriage with Baljeet Singh (petitioner No.2) and Sunita Rani is free to live her life, as per her wishes. It has further been stated that, in case, the petitioners approach the Criminal Misc. No.19109 -M of 2011 (O&M) 2 local police to seek police protection, police protection would be provided, as per law. In view of the reply, no further directions are required to be issued. The petition is disposed of. July 7, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?