IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2010 / 1ST MAGHA 1931 RPFC.No. 26 of 2010() --------------------- MC.293/2001 of FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:- -------------------------------- MANI @ PREMKUMAR, AGED 35,S/O.KANAKA,KAROTT HOUSE, PULINCHODE DESOM, P.O.PULINCHODE,(VIA) EDATHIRUTHI, KODUNGALLUR TALUK,THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR. P.R.SHAJI MR. K.N.CHANDRABABU RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS:- ---------------------------------- 1. MINI, AGED 26,D/O.CHARICHETTY APPUKUTTAN, P.O.KOOTTALA PARAMBU,CHENTHRAPPINNI, KODUNGALLUR TALUK. 2. MINOR CHINNU,AGED 5. 3. MINOR MONISHA,AGED 3. (MINORS REP.BY GUARDIAN AND MOTHER IST RESPONDENT, MINI) ADV. MR. V.BINOY RAM FOR R1 TO 3 THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR , J. -------------------------------------------------- R.P.(F.C.). No. 26 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of January, 2010. ORDER The petitioner who was the respondent before the Family Court, Thrissur challenges the final order passed by the Family Court in M.C. No. 293 of 2001 as per which the petitioner herein has been directed to pay monthly maintenance to his wife and children at the rate of Rs.500/-, Rs.300/- and Rs.300/- respectively from the date of petition till the date of order and thereafter at the rate of Rs.600/-, Rs.500/- and Rs.400/- respectively giving credit to the interim maintenance ordered by the Family Court. The order passed by the Family Court is after a careful evaluation of the oral evidence adduced by the parties. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he is a coolie worker and the matter can be taken up for settlement before the Adalath in case the revision is admitted. The revision can be admitted only if this Court R.P. (F.C) No. 26/2010 : 2 : satisfied that the order passed by the Family court below suffers from any irregularity, impropriety or illegality. What is awarded to the wife and children is only pittance. I am not inclined to admit this revision and drag to this Court the weak members of the family suffering from vagrancy and starvation. This revision is accordingly dismissed. Dated this the 21st day of January, 2010. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv R.P. (F.C) No. 26/2010 : 3 :