IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39940 of 2009 CHANDRA BHUSHAN KUMAR SINGH SON OF SRI DINESH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 24-11-2009 Heard both the parties. The petitioner seeks bail in a case institution under section 394 AND 414 of the Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is not named in the first information report wherein one Akhilesh Mandal who happens to be the uncle of the petitioner, has been named and subsequently the petitioner was arrested since part of the looted amount was recovered from his house about which the petitioner himself had confessed and stated that the same had been given by his uncle, let the above named petitioner , who is not named in any other case and who has not criminal antecedent and who is in custody since 20.07.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- ( Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Barhara P.S.Case No.85 of 2009 on the conditions : (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, - 2 - (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. ( Anjana Prakash, J ) BTiwary/