AJN 07-OS-WP2329.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2329 OF 2010 Ravindra Rajkishore Tripathi ... Petitioner Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ... Respondents Mr. V.A. Thorat, senior counsel i/b Mr. A.R. Pande for the petitioner. Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, senior counsel with Ms. K.R. Panjabi for the respondent-Corporation. CORAM: MRS. RANJANA DESAI & R.G. KETKAR, JJ. DATED : 7TH MARCH, 2011. P.C.:- 1. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. We notice that on the last occasion i.e. on 24/2/2011, the Corporation was directed to settle the claim of the AJN 07-OS-WP2329.10 2 petitioner towards subsistence allowance and regular salary. We are informed by Mr. Sakhare, learned senior counsel appearing for the Corporation that the Corporation has conducted that exercise and an amount of Rs.4,05,525/- has been paid to the petitioner. 3. Mr. Thorat, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the calculation made by the Corporation is not correct. He states that he will give the petitioner’s calculation to the City Engineers Department of the Corporation within a period of one week from today. 4. Mr. Sakhare states that upon receipt of the petitioner’s calculation, the Corporation shall check the record and, if any amount is found due, it would be paid over to the petitioner within four weeks from the date of receipt of the petitioner’s calculation. So far as the prayer as regards extension of the age of the petitioner is concerned, we are informed that a reminder-cum-representation dated 15/7/2010, which is annexed to the petitioner at Ex-R, is AJN 07-OS-WP2329.10 3 pending with the Corporation. Mr. Thorat states that the Corporation be directed to dispose of the petitioner’s reminder-cum-representation, expeditiously. Mr. Sakhare states that in case it is not disposed of, it will be disposed of expeditiously and the result thereof will be communicated to the petitioner. So far as the departmental inquiry conducted against the petitioner is concerned, Mr. Sakhare states that the departmental inquiry is completed and the report thereof will be submitted to the Competent Authority after following the due procedure of law, expeditiously. The above statements are accepted. The petition is disposed of. [MRS. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [R.G. KETKAR, J.]