u$< IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2480/04 / PE l l I IONER f&V ‘9 Parsan Singh, 5/0. Shi l Lakshan RE 1. State of Chhattisgarh, iTTirO’ugh" Secretary &I Ministry of General Administrative Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Secretary 8t Ministry of School Education. Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G. Secretary 8t Ministry of Tribal and Schedule Tribe Development Department, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Development Department, Ambikapur (C.G.) &I Collector, District Surguja (C.G.) Education Officer, Surajpur, strict Surguja (C.G.) 6. District Block Education Officer, Block Ramanujnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.) SPONDENTS ) Di Service; Resident of Brahampur, My Premnagar, Tahsil Suraipur, District «v 6" Surguja (C.G.) " 0* '5) e‘ VERSUS RIT PETITION CONSTITUTIO UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE a N OF INDIA W XI-HC-22 3mm WmW:Kt.MQ:£€§Q/<%lw$ ma WW WW mmmm évwm a 26-8-2004 On'a mention being made, this cake is taken up I>eutmnérisby Shriv Ashok Shaka gal/anew}; State by Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy Advocate General Wlth Shn Satlsh Gupua Dy.G.A. and Shri Akhil Agrawal and S ‘ Sandeep Dubey, Panel Lawyers. Heard The matter relates to transfer of t e penuoner from the respectlve place Ceunsel for the petltloner/s subm tted that the transfer of the peutloner/e has been > I effected illegally in contravemion of law nd policy. State counsel opposed it. State counsel submitted that'th petitioner/s has straightway tiled the petition without serving notice for demand ofjust‘ e and representation. Having heard and considered rival contentions, without eXpressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the opinion of this Court? ends of justice will be served if a direction is given to the peti 'oner/s to malee detailed representation raising his/her grievances and grounds before th . State Govermnent/competent authority of the respondents along with a copy of the peti ion and this order: within lO days, and on such representation being filed the State Gov ent/compe‘tent authority of the respondents, under the law, shall consider and decide he same on its own‘inerits in accordance, with law as early as possible preferably with six weeks from the date of receipt/production of the representation If any contraven ’on of policy or guidelines is brought toithe notices the same be considered on’ its own nerits. Counsel for the petitioner/s pray that after the decision of the representation if any grievance of the petitioner/s remai he/she may be allowed to ayail the remedy available under the law. 1t is open to the p titioner to avail the remedy available under the law. With the aforesaid observations t is petition stands disposed of Consequently \i WP if any, als stands disposed Certified copy as per rules (Jopy to State counsel for complia ce. Q, Sdl- Fakhruddin Judge { l’ _ e u e i n , o