THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5622 of 2009 ORDER: In the matter of granting Occupancy Rights Certificates (ORC) over the land in Survey No.1/20 of Asifnagar Revenue Village, admeasuring Acs.24.10 guntas under the provisions of A.P. (T.A.) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’), several proceedings have ensued. After remand for the second time by this Court, the matter is now pending before the Joint Collector, Hyderabad, the 1st respondent, in the form of an appeal under Section 24 of that Act. The petitioners state that they have filed as many as 21 documents in support of their claim for grant of ORCs and that the 1st respondent is not taking the same into account. Another grievance of the petitioners is that, no effort is being made by the 1st respondent to verify the relevant original records, referable to the documents filed by them. Heard Sri Keshav Hulsurkar, learned counsel for the petitioners, and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. Way back on 28.06.1978, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Western Division, Hyderabad, the 2nd respondent, granted ORC in favour of one Mr.Balaji Singh, son of Kishan Singh. Ever since then, the dispute is pending in one form or the other. On remand made by this Court, it is now pending adjudication before the 1st respondent. To support their claim, the petitioners, no doubt, have filed as many as 21 documents and already there is a direction by this Court that the same shall be taken into account. It is just un-understandable as to how the petitioners apprehended that their documents could not be taken into account by the 1st respondent. It is only when a final order is passed that it would become evident as to whether the documents were taken into account, and if so, how they were appreciated. In case, the petitioners feel aggrieved, at that stage, they can certainly prosecute the remedies. Even to allay the fear of the petitioners, the 1st respondent can be required to take the documents filed by the petitioners into account, which, in fact, would be his duty. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing that the 1st respondent shall dispose of the appeal, pending before him, as early as possible, duly taking into account the documents that are submitted by the petitioners as well as other parties. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dated:19.03.2009. GJ