IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40739 of 2010 MRITUNJAY SINGH @ TINKU SINGH son of Janardan Singh R.O.V Kasina P.S Garkha, Dist-Chapra (Saran) …………….Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………..Opposite Party ------------- 3. 14.03.2011 Heard Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mrs. Sahin Begum for the State. The allegation is directly made against the present petitioner that he fired and killed the deceased. The firing is said to be made by a licensed arms. The contention is that of the petitioner does not hold a licensed arms. The case diary as per paragraph 25 shows that there was a gun seized from the spot. It is further contended that there was case and counter case between the parties and the disputed land was the subject matter of proceedings under Section 145 Cr. P.C in which the possession was decided in favor of the accused persons. The further contention is that the prosecution party were the aggressors. Be that as it may, considering the direct nature of allegation made against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected. Anand Kr./Prakash ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)