IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25748 of 2008 BALAJI SINGH, SON OF LATE RAMCDAUR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHADAI BATHAN JAGDISHPUR, P.S. JAGDISHPUR, DISTT. BHOJPUR AT ARRAH. ----- PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. BABAN SINGH, SON OF RAMJI SINGH 3. DADAN SINGH, SON OF RAMJI SINGH ------ OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 05.05.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner who is the Informant of the present case is aggrieved with the order dated 4.3.2008 passed by the Sessions Judge, Bhojpur at Arrah, in Civil Revision No. 13 of 2008 by which it has declined to interfere with the order of cognizance passed by the court below. It was submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in the facts of the case an offence under 307 of the Indian Penal Code is made out. However, the Revisional Court dismissed his prayer on the ground that even subsequently if there was any evidence forthcoming to justify trial under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, the Magistrate would be at liberty to do so. I do not see any illegality in the revisional order, the application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)