THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15810 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner retired from the service of Singareni Collieries Company Limited. However, he was not extended the retirement benefits on two factors, namely that he did not vacate the company quarter even after retirement and that there are orders of attachment in different cases against him. A letter, dated 18.09.2008, was addressed to the petitioner referring to those facts. The petitioner feels aggrieved by the same. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. A perusal of the impugned letter discloses that the petitioner did not vacate the quarter and there are orders of attachment in as many as three civil cases. The contention of the petitioner that the orders of attachment ordered by the civil Courts are beyond the scope of Section 60 C.P.C. cannot be accepted. It is for the petitioner to approach the Courts, which ordered attachment and obtain suitable modifications. There is hardly anything, which the company can do, to verify whether the orders of attachment are within the scope of Section 60 C.P.C. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the civil Courts concerned and get the orders of attachment modified in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 08.11.2010. kdl