IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1462 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 5, 2010 Shukla Dhanda …Petitioner Versus Prem Kumar …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present: Ms. Puja Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioner. S.D.Anand, J. The petitioner is an old widowed lady. She filed an eviction action against the respondent-tenant on an averment of personal necessity. The matter is pending consideration at the hands of learned Rent Controller since the year 2006. The respondent-tenant is in arrears of rent w.e.f. 01.12.1999 which he has not paid till date. He did not tender the arrears of rent or house tax amount before the learned Rent Controller. The learned counsel states that the petitioner would be content and interests of justice would be served if C.R. No. 1462 of 2010 the learned Rent Controller is directed to dispose of the main petition in a time-bound frame. The petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Rent Controller to dispose of the main petition itself within six months w.e.f. 20.04.2010. The petitioner, through her counsel, is directed to appear before the learned Rent Controller on 20.04.2010. It has been reiterated umpteen times by this Court, by an order on the judicial side, that the personal necessity matters must deserve absolute priority. Even otherwise, this case belongs to another priority area pertaining to Senior Citizens. This Court would hope and trust that the learned Rent Controller shall ensure meticulous compliance with the orders of this Court requiring time- bound disposal. The acknowledgment (of a copy of this order) issued by the concerned Judicial Officer shall be forwarded to the Registry of this Court. Learned District Judge shall himself maintain a tab to ensure that the case is disposed of by afore-mentioned period. Disposed of accordingly. March 05, 2010 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2