IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 22ND AUGUST 2008 / 31ST SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 25305 of 2008(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- GEORGE THOMAS, S/O.THOMAS, AGED 50 YEARS THENGILAZHIKATHU HOUSE, KARIKKAM, ULIYANADUMURI, VETTIKAVALA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH SRI.SHERRY J. THOMAS RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD (KSEB), VYDHYUDHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (KSEB) ELECTRICAL MAJOR SECTION, VYDHYUDHI BHAVAN, KOTTARAKKARA. BY SC SRI. P.P. THAJUDEEN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No.25305 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of August, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner had earlier filed a writ petition and that was culminated into Ext.P1 judgment, wherein it was ordered that if the petitioner moves the second respondent seeking removal of the two electric posts, the second respondent will consider the same and take a decision thereon in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petitioner submitted Ext.P2 before the second respondent in Ext.P1 judgment. The complaint is that no decision has been taken on Ext.P2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a time limit may be fixed. 2. I heard learned Standing Counsel also. The writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P2 in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb