... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.527 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.527 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.527 OF 2005 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.271 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO.271 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL NO.271 OF 2005 Sau Smita Shriram Sohoni ...Applicant Vs. Satara Nagar Parishad ...Respondent Mr Janaji Mhatugade i/by Vinita Shashtry for the Applicant. None for the Respondent. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : MARCH 13, 2006. DATE : MARCH 13, 2006. DATE : MARCH 13, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Office noting shows that the Respondent is duly served with the notice of this Application. None appears for the Respondent. The Second Appeal is already admitted for final hearing. Ad-interim relief is granted in favour of the Applicant on 05th July, 2005. None appears for the Respondent. There is no reply filed. Hence, ad-interim relief granted earlier will have to be confirmed with the modification that even the Applicant will maintain status-quo as of today in all respects in respect of the disputed structure. 2. Hence, Civil Application is disposed of by directing that ad-interim relief granted on 05th July, 2005 will continue to operate till final disposal of the Second Appeal, subject to condition that the Applicant will maintain status-quo in all respects in respect of the structure in dispute. 3. There will be no orders as to costs. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE