s ^ssaiS'' !^3?' ^.'v^ 9 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER RESPONDENT WMT PETmON CC) No. 271 of2009 : Royal Travels Proprietor S.J. SinA, S/o Shri Vijay Bahadur Sin^i, Aged about 57 years, R/o Station Road, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS : Regional Transport Authority, Raipur (C.G.) WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF DMDIA SB: Hon'Ue Shri Sattsh K. Aenihotri. J. Present: Shri Santosh Gupta, Advoeate for the petitioner. Shri Shashaiak Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. ORALORDER >tB 1. (Passed on 19m day of Januaiy, 2009) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed an application for g-ant ofpermit before the respondait on 29.07.2008 (Annexure P/l) which is still pending consideration. Shri Thakur, leamed Panel Lawyer for the respondent submits fhat Ihere is no reason asto why the application ofthe petitioner, as stated above should not be considered within reasonable time i.e. 15 days from the date offiling of the applieation. Shri Thakur fiuther submits that the above-stated application shall be considered and decided by the concemed authority, in aecordance with law, on its own merits, within a period oftwo weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa, copy ofthis order. In view of the clear statement made by leamed counsel appearing for the respondent, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nofhing remains to be adjudicated. 4. Accordingly, Ifae petition stands disposed of. Amit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge f