IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30690 of 2008 MD.ASLAM & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.08.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the state. Petitioner No. 1 is husband and rest of the petitioners are in laws of the complainant. I fail to understand why anticipatory bail application on behalf of the petitioners was rejected by the Sessions Judge when in paragraph 6 of the impugned order dated 09.07.2008, it is mentioned that the informant herself appeared in the court and stated that the dispute has been compromised by her and she is living with her husband and family members. On the basis of the materials available before the sessions Judge ought to have granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Considering the facts, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners, namely, Md. Aslam, Md. Atiqullah, Aisha Khatoon @ Behtawali, Md. Haroon , Md. Razaullah Ansari, Md. Akram, Najma Khatoon, Sageera Khatoon and Md. Aleem is allowed. In the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, they will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two - 2 - sureties of the like amount each in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 40/08 to the satisfaction of CJM, Madhubani subject to the conditions as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. AKV/ (Mridula Mishra,J.)