BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Tenth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.10368 of 2011 S.SHANTHI ALIAS SORNAMMAL ... ACCUSED No.6/PETITIONER Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CITY CRIME BRANCH TIRUNELVELI CR.NO.18/2011 ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT For Petitioner : M/S. P.RAMASAMY Advocate For Respondent : A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.6 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 469 and 471 IPC in Crime No.18 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks for anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was charged under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 469 and 471 IPC in Crime NO.18 of 2011 and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. He further submits that already A1 to A3 were arrested and enlarged on bail, since the petitioner is also owner of the property and also standing on the same footing has preferred for anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) submitted that on the basis of the complaint given by the de-facto complainant, a case has been registered against the petitioner and the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 09.04.2009 and he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides, even though the case has been registered against eight persons under sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 469 and 471 IPC in Crime NO. 18 of 2011. Already A7 and A8 were enlarged on bail and A1 to A3 were arrested and enlarged on anticipatory bail and this petitioner is also standing on the same footing I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of her arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, and n executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 am., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 10/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TIRUNELVELI 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CITY CRIME BRANCH TIRUNELVELI 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. P.RAMASAMY Advocate SR.No.27032 G : 16.08.2011 : 2p/6c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10368 of 2011 Date :10/08/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/