IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.216 of 2009 DAMAYANTI DEVI MAHILA COLLEGE Versus JYOTIPURAM SAHKARI GRIH NIRMAN SAMITTEE LTD. & ANR. ----------- 2 27.4.2009 Heard counsel for the appellant. A judicial order has to be not only fulfill the requirement of the statute but also contain reasons for coming to such conclusion. In a matter of injunction, the trial court cannot decide the issue either with regard to the grant of injunction or refusal thereof without recording findings on the three ingredients, namely, prima-facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss. In the present case, all that has been mentioned by the court below is that in the facts and circumstances of the suit, the plaintiff has got no prima-facie case as he has got no balance of convenience in his favour and the plaintiff will not suffer any irreparable loss or injury. There is hardly any discussion by the court below for coming to such abrupt conclusion. That being so, this Court would set aside the impugned order and remit the matter 2 back to the court below which now after hearing the parties will pass a fresh order within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order by considering the prayer of injunction. The appeal is allowed to the aforementioned extent. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)