1 3367.11 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3367 OF 2011 Ms.Prajakta Santosh Gatkal & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus The Treasury Officer & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar with Mr.Prashant Patil for Petitioners. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for Respondent State. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED:- MAY 6, 2011. P.C. 1. The principal grievance of the petitioners, is that, although the petitioner No.2 had applied for transfer of family pension facility which was enjoyed by him, in favour of petitioner No.1 on account of certain subsequent developments, the said proposal has remained undecided since 13th November, 2009. 2. Accordingly, we dispose of this Petition with direction to the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to take decision on the pending proposal expeditiously, if already not taken, in any case, not later than eight weeks 2 3367.11 from today and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioners within the same time. All questions are kept open to be decided by the Appropriate Authority. 3. Petition disposed of on the above terms. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)