1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1517 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL ST.NO.244 OF 2009 Nanla Sukhla Pawara ..APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENT Smt. Anjali Dube, Advocate (appointed) for the applicant; Mr S.K. Kadam, APP for the respondent. CORAM: P.V. HARDAS AND R.K.DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 16th JUNE, 2009. PER COURT : By this application the applicant seeks condonation of delay of one year and 183 days in filing Criminal Appeal. We have heard Smt. Anjali Dube, learned Counsel appointed on behalf of the applicant and A.P.P. Shri S.K. Kadam on behalf of the respondent. For the reasons disclosed in the application, application for condonation of delay is allowed and delay is condoned. [ R.K. DESHPANDE, J ] [ P.V. HARDAS, J ] (amj/criap1517.09 2 WRIT PETITION NO.OF 200. Date of decision :...06.2009 For approval and signature. THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE P.V. HAREDAS THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE R.K. DESHPANDE 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers } may be allowed to see the judgment? } Yes. 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? } Yes/No 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment? } No. 4. Whether this case involves a substantial } question of law as to the interpretation } 3 of the Constitution of India, 1950 or } any Order made thereunder? } No. 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the } Civil Judges? } No. 6. Whether the case involves an important } question of law and whether a copy of } the judgment should be sent to Mumbai, } Nagpur and Panaji offices? } No. [Anant Joshi] Private Secretary to the Honourable Judge.