IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2084 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4218 OF 2003 Anil Gurudas Raikar ...Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.Prashant Badole with Mr.Ganesh Gole for Applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. APRIL 11, 2005. APRIL 11, 2005. APRIL 11, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. Application is not pressed in terms of prayer clause (b). 3. The only question that requires to be : 2 : considered is: whether the condition requiring the Applicant to report to Malad Police Station twice a week, ought to be relaxed. 4. Learned A.P.P. fairly accepts that as trial has commenced, that condition can be relaxed by requiring the Applicant to report to the concerned police Station once in a month on first Sunday of every English Calender month. 5. Application allowed only to this limited extent. 6. Rest of the conditions in the bail order dated 9th January 2004 to remain as it is. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.