IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2003 OF 2008 IN APPEAL NO.194 OF 2002 IN R.A.D. SUIT NO.5043 OF 1974 Mr.Paredshi s/o.Mulchand Kandu & Anr...Petitioners Versus Shri.Sabi Pareira @ Servelus J.Pereira ...Respondent ...... Mr.K.R.Tiwari for Petitioners. Mr.G.K.Vora for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JULY 7, 2008. JULY 7, 2008. JULY 7, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. No error, much less, manifest error has been pointed out by the Counsel for the Petitioners. The Courts below have proceeded on the premiss that the suit premises were situated on Survey No.43 which in turn had vested with the : 2 : Mumbai Municipal Corporation for the purpose of road widening. That finding of fact has not been challenged nor any material has been produced before me to question the correctness thereof. The conclusion reached by the Court below cannot be faulted with. Accordingly, no ground is made out for entertaining this Petition. Hence, dismissed. Sd/- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.