IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.24341 OF 2009 1. CHHOTTU YADAV, SON OF HEMAN YADAV 2. DHARMENDRA YADAV, SON OF BHAIRO YADAV 3. MANOJ YAAV 4. HEMAN YADAV, BOTH SONS OF JEHAL YADAV, ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE NUMAR (TOLA BIJAY NAGAR) P.S. BARHAT, DISTRICT JAMUI ……………………………………………………..…PETITIONERS VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR……OPPOSITE PARTY ----------- 3. 30.10.2009 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The case is under sections 323, 341, 325, 307, 379 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the first information report there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons of having assaulted the son of the informant. Out of the accused persons who are said to have assaulted the injured, two have been allowed bail by this Court vide Annexure-3 with observation that there is nothing in the F.I.R. nor in the rejection order as to who has caused the grievous injury. Petitioners are also in the same category. Petitioners are in custody since1.4.2009 and 13.5.2009, respectively. Considering the above facts and circumstances and also considering the order of this Court annexed as Annexure-3, the - 2 - application is allowed. Let petitioners, namely, Chhottu Yadav, Dharmendra Yadav, Manoj Yadav and Heman Yadav, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in Barhat P.S. Case No.95/08 with conditions as laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioners. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioners and take steps for their arrest. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)