IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.32096 OF 2010 1. LALLAN RAM, SON OF LATE JAWAHIR RAM 2. LALMUNI DEVI, WIFE OF LALLAN RAM 3. NANDLAL RAM @ NAND LAL SHARMA, SON OF LALLAN RAM ALL ARE RESIDEENT OF VILLAGE PARSADA, POLICE STATION DHANSOIN, DISTRICT BUXAR ………………………………………………………………………………..PETITIONERS VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ********** 2 07/10/2010 Heard Counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. There is no specific allegation against the brother-in-law, the petitioner no. 3 and therefore, he is directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrenders before the Court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 979 of 2009/ Trial No. 5562 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram at Rohtas subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the husband is a dumb person whereas the 2 complainant is a lame lady and, therefore, the question of demand of dowry after the marriage is absolutely false. From the complaint petition, there appears to be specific allegation against the mother-in-law and the father-in-law of assaulting the complainant. Considering this aspect, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the above named petitioner nos. 1 and 2. This application so far as petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are concerned, is hereby dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )