IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4632 of 2010 BIKASH KUMAR SAH . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3 07.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the informant. On merit, the petitioner’s application was first rejected by order dated 12.12.2008 (Annexure-1). Again on 5.8.2009, his prayer for bail was considered and rejected with the following observation: “ Let the Trial Court take appropriate steps and examine all the prosecution witnesses on or before 24th December, 2009 failing which the petitioner shall have liberty to approach this Court.” A status report has been called for and from perusal whereof, it appears that several witnesses on behalf of the prosecution have already been examined. Only two witnesses are yet to be examined. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant assures this Court that every step shall be taken to conclude the examination of prosecution witnesses within three months from today. Having considered the aforesaid submissions, this Court, while declining the prayer of the petitioner, disposes of the application with observation that if within three months from today, all prosecution witnesses are not examined in the case, the petitioner may renew prayer for bail. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )