1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO 2580 OF 2011. Atish Bramhanand Tembhurne .Vrs. Union of India, thr. Secretary, Ministry of Commerce and another. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. (S/Shri M.M.Sudame, A.M.Sudame and P.P.Pendke, Advocate for Petitioner.) CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.D.KODE, J J. DATED : 13.06.2011 Heard Mr. Sudame, Learned Counsel for Petitioner. The Petitioner was appointed on Ad-hoc/ temporary basis for some time. His appointments were shown for 89 days on each occasion. His claim for regularization in service is rejected by Central Administrative Tribunal. The contentions before us is that respondents should have issued requisite notice prior to his termination. We do not find petitioner entitled for regularization in service. Issue is covered by Constitution Bench Judgment of Honourable Apex Court 2 in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others Vrs. Umadevi and Others,reported in A.I.R. 2006 Supreme Court, 1806. Hence, We do not find any merit in the petition, accordingly Writ Petition rejected. JUDGE JUDGE scd//