srk １ lpast-2815-10 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (STAMP) NO.2815 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1922 OF 2009 Samarjit S. Narang ... Appellant Versus Samata Sahakari Bank Ltd. and others. ... Respondents ALONGWITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (STAMP) NO.2817 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1923 OF 2009 Samarjit S. Narang ... Appellant Versus Samata Sahakari Bank Ltd. and others. ... Respondents ALONGWITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (STAMP) NO.2819 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1925 OF 2009 Shirin Hudda ... Appellant Versus Samata Sahakari Bank Ltd. and others. ... Respondents Mr. Nishant Sasidharan i/by M/s. L.J. Law for the appellants. Mr. Sameer Patil, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.2 and 3. Dr. M. Shah Alam Khan for respondent No.1. Mr. Naveen Amaldar Singh, Officer, Loan & Recovery of respondent No.1- bank. CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. Tuesday, August 17, 2010 P.C. Mr. Nishant Sasidharan, learned counsel appearing for the appellants in all the three appeals and the learned counsel for respondent No.1 Samata Sahakari Bank Limited state that their respective clients have arrived at a settlement which is recorded in writing as per the consent terms signed today i.e. on 17th August, 2010. The consent terms are signed by the appellants in each of the three appeals and also by Mr. Naveen Amaldar Singh, Officer, Loan & Recovery of respondent No.1 Samata Sahakari Bank Limited. 2. The appellants as well as Mr. Mr. Naveen Amaldar Singh, Officer, Loan & Recovery who are present before the court today admit having signed the consent terms and arrived at a settlement in terms of which all the three appeals are to be disposed of. 3. The learned counsel further requests that all the three appeals be disposed in terms of the consent terms. 4. Having heard the learned counsel for all the parties and having gone through the consent terms, we dispose of all the appeals in terms of consent terms which are taken on record and marked `X' for identification purposes. 5. We also take on record the undertakings given by respondent No.1 as recorded in the consent terms. 6. Appeals stand disposed of accordingly. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.