IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 2996 of 2007 Between: Akupogu Marenna, S/o. A.Buddanna, R/o. Gudur Post & Mandal, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P.State Council For Higher Education, Rep.by its Secretary, Mahavir Marg, Masab Tank,Hyderabad. 2 The Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Rep.by its Registrar,Anantapur, Anantapur District. 3 Azizia, College of Education, Adoni, Kurnool District, rep. by its Secretary & Correspondent Mohd.Nazeer Khan,S/o. Abdul Azees Khan, R/o.Adoni, Kurnool Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent issued in Letter No.APSCHE/SEC/CET/Ed.CET-2005/No.21 dt.13-12- 2006 so far as directing the 3rd respondent college to deleting the name of the petitioner from the admission list of B.Ed Maths Methodology on the ground that the 3rd respondent college has resorted to deviations from the prescribed pre centages in Methodology admissions and violation of rules and norms laid down in G.O.Ms.No.26 School Education (Trg.Al) Department dt.3-2-2005 and also G.O.Ms.no.27 School Education(Trg .A1) Department dt.3-2-2005 and the consequential Proceedings of the 2nd respondent issued in SKU/Exams/B.Ed/06 dt.30-12-2006 in canceling the Register No.61060111 allotted to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of Natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 1 &2 to permit the petitioner to appear for the examinations schedule to be commence from 19-2-2007 or thereafter in B.Ed Maths Methodology Courses both Theory and practicals for the academic year 2005-06 from the 3rd respondent College and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.SUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: C.SUDESH ANAND(SC FOR APSCHE) The Court made the following : O R D E R:- This writ petition is filed to quash the proceedings, dated 13.12.2006 issued by the 1st respondent whereby the 3rd respondent- College was directed to delete the petitioner’s name from the admission list of B.Ed. (Mathematics Methodology) on the ground that the 3rd respondent-college has deviated from the prescribed percentages in admissions relating to Methodology course and made admissions in violation of the norms and Rules laid down by the government in G.O.Ms.No.26, dated 3.2.2005 and G.O.Ms.No.27, dated 3.2.2005, and consequently to direct respondents 1 and 2 to permit the petitioner to appear for the examinations scheduled to be commenced from 19.2.2007 or thereafter in B.Ed. (Mathematics Methodology) course for the academic year 2005-5006 from the 3rd respondent-college. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 have submitted that after filing the writ petition, the admission of the petitioner was ratified, and in view of that, the writ petition may be closed with a direction to the respondents to announce the results of the examinations written by the petitioner. In view of the submission made by both the learned counsel that the petitioner’s admission into B.Ed. (Mathematics Methodology) Course for the academic year 2005-2006 was ratified, this writ petition is closed. However, the respondents are directed to announce the results of the examinations written by the petitioner. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 12th February, 2009 Note: Issue copy by wire B/o bcj