1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRI WRIT PETITION NO. 212 OF 2010. (SHEIKH MOUJIB SHEIKH MAJJID...VS... STATE OF MAHARASHTA & OTH.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. A.H.Lohiya, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. T.A.Mirza, A.P.P. for Respondents. CORAM : A.P.LAVANDE AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 03, 2010. Heard Mr. Lohiya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mirza, learned A.P.P. for the respondents. By this petition the petitioner has, inter alia, sought direction against the respondents to initiate enquiry against the erring officers who are responsible for illegal detention of the petitioner. In the affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.2 it has been stated that the action has been recommended against the erring officers. Mr. Mirza, learned A.P.P., upon taking instructions from the concerned Commissioner of Police, Amravati, states that appropriate action would be taken against the erring officer – respondent No.4 herein. We expect the Commissioner of Police, Amravati to take appropriate action in accordance with law against the erring officer, expeditiously and in any case on or before 31st December, 2010. 2 Mr. Lohiya, learned counsel for the petitioner states that liberty be granted to the petitioner to challenge the action taken by the Commissioner of Police, in case the petitioner is not satisfied with the same. Needless to mention that the petitioner is always at liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available in law. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE RR.