^ \&€\ ^JM^S S-. n..... IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S)NO. 5~1?0 / 2011 6 PETITIONER 4<< .s-f^' ^"".^'...-^ .ft*^ .-•'''. Shankeshwar Singh Thakur, S/o. Shri Ganpat Singh Thakur, aged about 56 years, R/o. Purani Basti, Kharsiya, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ^"y '<^.-- ^^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: - Secretary, Revenue and Disaster Managenaent Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. ' Director, Revenue Department, Raipur (C.G.) 3. ' Commissioner Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Collector, Land Record, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (C.G.) WRIT PETITIONUNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE ', CONSITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERIS1 As mentioned in the cause tiUe. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENT(S) As mentioned above ih the cause title. •&? 'w-:- :\^ Anut ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BITA8PIJR PETmONER WMT PETmON CS) No. 5180 of2011 Shankeshwar Singh Thafctir. RE.SPONDENTS VERSIJS State ofChhattisearh & Others. WRIT PRTmON IJNDRR ARTICI.R 226 OT THR CONSTJTimON OF FNDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri, J. Preserrt: Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocate tbr the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Moorthy, Depuly Advocate Gensral for lae tfari S.P. NavTatna, Dy. Coimnissioner (R.), Bilaspur, is presenl. OROKR (ORAT,) (Passedon06dayofSeptember,2011) 1. At the very outset, Shri Moorthy, leamed coiinsel appearing for the State/respondents, on instnictiom, siibmits that the order dated 12.08.2011 (Amiexure P/l) impugned hwein, has not been passed by a campetent authority in accordance with Rule 20, Part 11, of the Madhva Pradesh/Chhatfisearii Land Record ManuaL tiius, the same is uasitstoinable in law and shall not be given effect to. 2. In view of the above suhmission made by leamed State eounsel, accordme to leamed coiuisel for the petitioners, nothine siu-vives for adjudication atthis stage. 3. Accordinely, the impugned order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexiire P/l) is quashed. However, liberty is reserved to fhe State/respondents to pass appropriate order, if so advised, in accordance with law, in adminibtrative exigency and in public interest. 4. The writ petition is allowed. No order asto costs. Saus..^wb°t" 3ud&e