IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9084 of 2011 CHANDAN @ CHANDAN SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 04.04.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Allegedly, petitioner along with other accused persons mercilessly assaulted the informant as well as her other family members and it is stated that on account of the aforesaid assault the informant’s husband sustained injury and died. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no such occurrence, as alleged in the FIR, has taken place and, as a matter of fact, informant’s husband died of his ailment. It is also pointed out by him that after due investigation police submitted final form showing the case untrue and also prayed before the court below for initiation of proceeding under sections 182 and 211 of the IPC against the informant. Photo stat copy of the post mortem report is also annexed as annexure 2 with the supplementary affidavit. It reveals that no external injury was found on the person of the deceased. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let petitioner, Chandan @ Chandan Sah, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in Sugauli P.S. Case no. 304/2009. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)