IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.841 of 2009 SUNDAR LAL SINGH SON OF LATE LABARCHAND SINGH, RESIDENT OF RANIGANJ DIWAN TOLA, P.S. RANIGANJ, DISTRICT ARARIA. …PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SUBHASH CHANDRA SINGH SON OF LATE GANGA PRASAD SINGH 3. RAGHUBANSH SINGH SON OF LATE GANGA PD. SINGH. 4. CHANDAN KUMAR SINGH SON OF SUBHASHCHAND SINGH 5. KULDEEP SINGH SON OF LATE BHASAWAN SINGH 6. ARBIND KUMAR SINGH SON OF KULDEEP SINGH 7. TARACHAND YADAV SON OF ALTE UCHIT LAL YADAV 8. BIRBAL YADAVE SON OF MAHABIR YADAV 9. TETAN YADAV SON OF MAUJI LAL YADAV 10. KRITYANAND SINGH SON OF SANTLAL SINGH ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE JAMUNGHAT P.S. RANIGANJ, ARARIA. …OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 02. 20.04.2011 Informant is the petitioner and thus igniter of the criminal proceeding which led to trial being Trial No. 193/09 of the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class Araria. O.Ps. herein were put on trial for the charge(s) punishable under sections 147188,323,341,425,447 and 504 IPC. Six witnesses, in all, were examined on behalf of prosecution to prove the charge(s) beyond shadow of reasonable doubts. Learned trial court critically evaluated their evidence and found that the evidence on record falls short of proving the charge(s) beyond shadow of reasonable doubts. I have perused the judgment and the conclusion recorded by learned trial court at page 9 and 10 of the impugned order. In my view, learned court below has taken a view based on materials on record 2 which cannot be said to be perverse and/or patently illegal meriting interference. The application is dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )