r.L -'r •ero IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. ^ ^-7 /200^ PETITIOJMER CX y/^ •,..- 'y'/^<'}:'r\/' v'lE7'^'V'A %y /^^' ^-Kanhaiya Lal Dansena S/o. Shri Premanand Dansena Aged about 54 years Post-Upper Division Teacher R/o. Village -Paumathali, Tahsil & District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^-1: State of Chhattisgarh ^^ Through: Secretary 1" )^ Department of Education ^>c< Mantralaya, ,^ Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) D.K.S. <0 > 3.- District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) Block Education Officer Btock-Tamnar District-Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 22L6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR GT;^>" f'iITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS XI-HC-78 3n^T?iTf^IR; tiaiT3:T[^T?iIIW < - Gopal ^ii+i^i 3»*n^i 3?? ^(pn^pTLSTftwTS, (aKniyy / ce^^l^ ^&.j-zg/^ O 200 341^14a<h (yf^q^ar) ?(<ITW:trf?(T3ncRT 7-2.200' Mr. Ramakant Pandey, Mrs. Anju Ahuja and M| Advocates for the State/re^ coilnse With the consent of learneS matter is heard finally and dispos^d Common order dictated in| Court, passed separately. ^Rlfepft^ WRft'tf fS^ i^rRTC ^sil^Hsn^ST for the petitioners. '. Satish Gupta, Deputy Government pondents. counse! appearing for the parties, the of. Writ Petition (S.) No.729,'2007 in open Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge P.T.O. FWS.^?^T-^^S*i^S^»^1^ HIGH COURT OF CHyATnSSARHAT BILASPUR SiNGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. WRIT PETmON (S.} N0.729 OF 2007 Petitioner : Kanhaiya Lal Dansena versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and Qthers EetjtioneT Respondents WRIT PETmON (S.S N0.730 OF 2007 versus State ofChhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Ramatcant Pandey, counsel for the petifionere. Mrs. Anju Ahuja and Mr. Satish Gupta, Depuiy Government Advocates for ths State/respondents. vth (Passed on 7"' Day of February, 2W7 Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that the facte and question of iaw invoived in ie present writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of 'ttis Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj vs. Munlapal Corporation, Durg snd 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Kumar BharsSwaj (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed. Certificate at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or noS. NoorderasSocosts. A copy of this order be placed wit petffion. the record of the Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gopai 1 2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96