IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM THURSDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2011 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 3961 of 2011(U) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. PRINCE PRADEEP, AGED 34, S/O.MUTHUSWAMI REDDIYAR, TC 5/1230(4), LIZZY COTTAGE, PIPPINMOODU JN., SASTHAMANGALAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. PAPPAMMAL, AGED 74, W/O.MUTHUSWAMI REDDIYAR, TC 5/1230(4), LIZZY COTTAGE, PIPPINMOODU JN., SASTHAMANGALAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.E.M.MURUGAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- THE CHIEF MANAGER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, CHALLAI BRANCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 009. BY ADV. MR.R.S. KALKURA, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.3961 of 2011 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of March, 2011 J U D G M E N T ---------------------- Considering the alternative remedy available, this court was not inclined to entertain this writ petition. However, dispossession of the petitioner from the property which is alleged to be his residential house, was stayed subject to condition of the petitioner remitting a sum of Rs.4 lakhs within three weeks from 8.2.2011. Subsequently, on the basis of an application made by the petitioner the time stipulated for payment was extended till 15.3.2011. 2. Today, when the matter was taken up for consideration, it is conceded that the condition stipulated has not been complied with. Hence I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition any further. However, it is made clear that the petitioner will be at liberty to pursue statutory remedies if any available under law. 3. Therefore the writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to rights if any available to the petitioner to invoke statutory remedy. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. okb