IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 6871/2009 Rajendra vs.State of Rajasthan Dated : 07.09.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Rajendra Yadav, for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Fauzdar, for JVVNL. Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor for the State. This order governs the disposal of bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by Shri Rajendra Yadav Advocate on behalf of the applicant Rajendra @ Raju pertaining to F.I.R. No. 244/2009 at police station Kotputali, District Jaipur, in the offences under Sections 136 of Electricity Act. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the JVVNL and learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and perused the material on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has canvassed that he has been in custody since April, 2009. His name does not figure in the First Information Report and 328 meters wire stolen from point P-C to LT line are alleged to have been stolen by unknown persons. Learned counsel has further contended that he has been falsely implicated in this case, hence, he may be granted indulgence of bail. 4. Learned counsel for the JVVNL as also learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State have opposed the bail petition on the ground that the bail petition of co-accused Jai Ram Yadav and others, has already been dismissed by the co-ordinate Bench and the case of the petitioner is similar to those of the co-accused persons. However, the co-ordinate Bench of this Court had directed the trial court to expedite and conclude the trial within a period of 60 days and if, it was not possible to conclude within 60 days, then to dispose within a reasonable time. Hence, the bail petition may be dismissed. 5. Having reflected over the submissions made at the bar and scanned the relevant material available on record, I, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, do not deem it just and proper to grant indulgence of bail to the accused petitioner as, already for speedy trial of the case, a direction has been issued by the co-ordinate Bench. The trial court is again directed to expedite the trial and conclude within the stipulated time. 6. In the result, the bail petition filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. stands dismissed. (MAHESH BHAGWATI),J. Mak/- s-15