1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8989 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri Priyal G.Sarda for the Petitioners. Shri Shrishail Sakhare for the Respondent. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 8th February, 2010. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. An application made by the Petitioners at Exhibit-66 has been ordered to be filed by the impugned order dated 7th September, 2009. The contention of the Petitioners is that the original Agreement dated 8th June, 2004 is in the custody of the Respondent. The contention of the Respondent on oath is that the original document has been misplaced. By the impugned order, the trial Court has observed that at this stage, it cannot be inferred that the Respondent is in possession of the original document. By the impugned order, the application made by the 2 Petitioner has not been rejected on merits. It is ordered to be filed. After the parties adduce their evidence, at the time of final hearing of the suit, the trial Court can always draw appropriate inferences on the basis of the evidence on record. No interference at this stage is called for when the impugned order is purely interlocutory in nature. Subject to what is observed above, the Writ Petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA,J) ash