1 WP10218.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION KJ WRIT PETITION NO.10218 OF 2010 Shri Surendra Digambar Juvekar )..Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Registrar, Co-op.Societies Thane) and Ors. )..Respondents ---- Mr.Kishor S.Patil for the petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane AGP for the respondent nos.1, 2 & 4. ---- CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ DATE : 22/12/2010. PC 1 Matter is not on board. Mentioned. Papers are produced. 2 The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent no.1 may be directed to decide the objections given by the petitioner in connection with the voters’ list. Learned AGP states that whatever 2 WP10218.10.sxw may be the objections, that will be dealt with by the respondent no.1 in accordance with law immediately and without disturbing election programme. We however, made it clear that since the date of election is notified, deciding the objections by respondent no.1 should not mean that election programme should be disturbed in any manner and election shall be held on due date. It is also clarified that if any concerned party is required to be heard, it is for the respondent no.1 to hear him and consider his objection if any, and pass appropriate order. Learned Advocate for the petitioner requests for deleting respondent no.3. Permission to delete respondent no.3 is granted. Petition disposed of accordingly. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J) (P.B.MAJMUDAR,J)