c^^-^L_ fs^ IN THE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTCS6ARH AT BILA5PUR WRIT PETCTCON (S) N0.<.r. . .../2^-/^°^ PETITIONER isaa RESPON&ENTS \^v..r ^0^-'-^. ^^^ ^-••' ^••'^.\,^>x- ^\/v.- ^yy ^.^ Bhagesh Kumar bewangan, Son of latf Narayan Prasad Dewangan, aged about 38 years, R/o. Village Akhara, Tahsil Patan, District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 1.'' The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Health Department, &.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.), 2:' Chief Medical Officer, Durg, District Durg (C.6.), 3. Block Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Nikum, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.), 4. ' Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Patan, District - Durg (C.6.), THE WRIT PETCTCON UNDER ARTCCLE 226 OF COUNSTCTUTION OF INDIA. The petitioner above-named most respectfully submit as under:- 1. PARTiCULARS OF THE PETtTEONERS: As mentioned in the cause title above. 2. P^RTCCULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS; •> As mentioned in the cause title above. ^, •i/>\ ^-•' STI^I'^iI'^RT w sn^T *s<i<* deepti ^ ^^ -<iwwt{, ^BtWTS, fsldiy^ ,io-P-CS>)i^a • s;K<&h) >00 "^^00 Si^Sf'mT ('^fg^'T) ^•RiWSfel 3i)^l SB : Hon'ble Shri ManindraMohhn Shrivastava, J. 13-05-2011 Shri R.S.Patel, counsel for the Shri N.Naha Roy, Panel Lawy< Heard. The petitioner has filed this multipurpose health worker who died compassionate appointment and he Shiksha Karmi Grade-111. The pef appointed asAssistantGrade-111 acco| Learned State counsel submitj given an opportunity of filing the d( respondent authority, which may be with law. Having considered and witho case, in the opinion of this Court, efids of justice will be served, if a direction is given to the petitioner to make a before the competent respondent a this order, within six weeks from tod. accordance with law, as early as pos] <*l<lf<-f<i)-< 'qwS ^ tc^ '"a^R ^? sffm &T!^I tietitioner. ir for the State. (etition on the ground that he is a ward of /hile in service. He moved an application for las been given appointment on the post of ioner submitted that he is entitled to be •ding to the policy. :ed that for the present, the petitioner may be tailed representation before the competent :onsidered on its own merits, in accordance expressing any opinion on the merits of the ipetailed representation raising his grievance Ithority along with a copy of the petition and |y, and on such representation being filed, the competent respondent authority s^all decide the same on its own merits in ible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the repr^sentation. If any grievance still remains, the petitioner may avail the remedy avail^ble under the law. With the aforesaid observatio|is, this petition stands disposed off. Certified copy as per rules. ^lanindra^anShrivastava Judge wga«ni.OT,tia-fl!?Tra—FS.'i4o—2/2ou~i,5o,ooo.