IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2753 of 1996 Date of decision 10.03.2009 Rukmani Devi .....Petitioner versus Raj Kishan Saini .....Respondent Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice A. N. JINDAL. Present: Anupam Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. A. N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) Having scrutinised the impugned judgment, it appears that the ejectment has been claimed on the basis of non-payment of house tax and which could be claimed after issuing the notice to the respondent and the same has not been done. As such the non payment of house tax does not entail the eviction. Finding no merit in the revision petition, the same is dismissed. ( A. N. JINDAL ) JUDGE 10.03.2009 A.Kaundal