1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 49 OF 2010 M/s Kanchan Restaurant & Caters .. Petitioner. Vs. GGM, IRCTC & Ors. . .... Respondents ..... Mr. R.B. Raghuvanshi i/b Ms. Neeta Lad, for the Petitioner Ms. Sonali Shinde i/b M/s Consulta Juris, for Respondent Nos.1,4, & 9. Mr. Suresh Kumar, for Respondent No.8 ..... CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATE : 13 th APRIL, 2010. P.C. 1. Shri Raguvanshi, appearing on behalf of petitioners states in all fairness that paragraph-1 of the contempt petition would disclose that it is filed alleging non compliance of the order dated 16th September 2009 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in SLP (Civil) No.10742 and 10743 of 2007. In such circumstances and when this aspect was brought to his notice he states that the contempt petition could not have been filed in this court. 2. From the averments in the petition it is clear that the contempt petition alleges contempt of an order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. The petitioners ought to have instituted such petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. In such circumstances, the petition is not 2 maintainable and it is accordingly dismissed but reserving liberty to the petitioners to adopt appropriate proceedings (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)