IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1028 of 2010 Md.Ali Khan S/o Md. Samal Khan, R/o village- Bansar, P.S. Palasi, District- Araria------------------Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Bibi Rahmati Khatoon D/o Md. Shamim & W/I Md. Alim Khan R/o village- Bansal, P.S. & District- Araria--------------- -----------------------------------------------Opposite parties ---------------------------------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Rabi Bhushan Pd. No.1, Advocate Mr. Arbind Kumar Anand, Advocate For the State: Pronati Singh, APP --------------------------- 2 15.12.2011 The husband petitioner has preferred this revision application under section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against the order dated 26.5.2010 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Purnea in Case No. M. 248 of 2006 by which the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 2000/- per month as interim maintenance and Rs. 150/- per month as the expenses of proceeding to the wife i.e. opposite party no.2. The grievance of the petitioner is that there is no relationship of husband and wife and secondly he is unable to pay the amount of interim maintenance. It is admitted fact that the main case for maintenance is still pending as Maintenance Case No. 248 of 2006 before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Purnea. The petitioner is at liberty to raise his grievance there. This petition stands disposed of. RPS ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)