^ i^s^. ^^m ^t^" c^i^^ r.'S^f .A^" IN THEHIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR TC.G.1 W.P. fSS No. C^}<7 ? /2008 A ^^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Smt. MeenaMishra,W/o.M nik(^i&'tn'"rt:i aged about 40 years, Upper Division Teacher,— Tilak Government Girls Higher ' Secondary School, Durg, District Durg (C.G.), VERSUS ^ ~ ' ': ; 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through n :The Secretary, Department'of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block- " Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 4. Principal, Tilak Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Durg, District Durg (C.G.), WRIT PETITION U/A226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA JSt' HiGH_COURT QF CHHATTISGARH : BtLASPUR uuur^i iwfi PETITIIOHER WRIT PETJTION (S) N0. 5433 OF 2S Smt. Meena Mishra RESPONDENTS •?'"T''^^^L*T-<!,-> &?a'c©OT unnsEis ^h.("fr»'rf»* 1€fS la, tWrit Petition underA'rticle 226 ofthe.Constitution of SingSe Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. snt:- Sh'ri Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate for the petitionei Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawverforthe State. 01 ?AD (Passed on this 11'" day of March, 2010) Learned counsel appeari le Stai that imputed order dated -17-9-2008 (Annexure - P/1) has .^CUs been passed without affording opportunity of hearinc to the petitioner. Leamed eounsei further submits that the State shaii recail the order and the State may be granted liberty to take appropriate steps after issulng si affording an opportunity of hearinc accordance with iaw. cta Deisnoner 2. !n view of the above categoricai statement made by the iearned counsei aopearina forthe State, accordina tc learned counse! i.i 5C f flOllIlilU survives in this Detition foi ^- 1UUII. 3. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid iiueitv. - 4. Conseauentlv, interim' order passed eariler stands.discharged.' Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge