IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.38 of 2010 UMESH PRASAD SINGH, son of Late Yugal Prasad Singh Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 14.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 325, 307, 511, 498-A, 376 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. Submission of the counsel is that the allegations in the complaint are totally absurd and improbable since it is not believable that a family will agree to molestation of their own daughter-in-law. Taking into consideration the aforementioned fact as also the fact that the petitioner is the father-in-law and a person of advance age, let the petitioner, above named, who is in custody since 5.9.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger, in connection with Tarapur P.S. case no.62 of 2009,subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)