IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P NO. 7904 OF 2009 DECIDED ON : 22.05.2009 M/s S. S. Enterprises ...Petitioner versus Union of India and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT Present : Mr. Baldev Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is an approved contractor and has executed various works allotted by the Army Authorities including respondents No.2 to 6. The petitioner is now aggrieved at the order dated 29.02.2008 passed by respondent No.3 whereby it has been directed that no contract shall be allotted to the petitioner. Pursuant thereto, the tenders submitted by the petitioner for different works have also been rejected. The aforesaid action appears to have been taken against the petitioner on the basis of an alleged single deficiency, namely, delay in execution of one of the works in relation to which the arbitration proceedings are stated to have been sought. The petitioner has made representation dated 09.06.2008 (Annexure P-17) as well as some other representations against the exclusion of his name from amongst the list of contractors to whom the works are allotted. C.W.P NO. 7904 OF 2009 -2- Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought by the petitioner, I am of the considered view that representation made by the petitioner and/or supplementary representation which he may like to make, deserves to be considered by respondent No.3. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to take cognizance of the petitioner's representation/supplementary representation, if any, against the decision dated 29.02.2008 and dispose of the same by passing a reasoned order, as early as possible but not later than three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Disposed of. MAY 22, 2009 (SURYA KANT) shalini JUDGE