1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7936 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr.G.V.Wani, counsel for petitioner. CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 1/09/2010 1] The Petition raises challenge to the concurrent orders passed by the Courts below on an application tendered by petitioner seeking interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Both the Courts below have recorded findings on appreciation of fact that the petitioner is not in possession of the disputed property and as such, an application tendered seeking interim injunction has been turned down. Considering the concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below on the point of present possession of the plaintiff 2 over the disputed property, no interference is called for in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition stands rejected. (R.M.BORDE,J.) umg/wp-7936-10