1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 7754/2010 Rameshwar Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 19.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr HP Verma - for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is behind bars for the last forty days. He is facing trail for the offence under section 456 IPC. The occurrence took place in the year 1995. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. He submits that it is a case of bail jump on many occasions. He has been arrested on 9.7.2010. Standing arrest warrants were issued against him when he did not attend the court 2 on 5.4.2007. No justifiable cause exists for his absence for all this period. Thus, he may not be granted bail. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, bail application is dismissed. However, trial court is directed to expedite trial and, if possible, conclude the same within sixty days from receipt of copy of this order. If for good and sufficient reasons the trial is not concluded within sixty days, then petitioner may be released on bail by the trial court if the bail application is filed by him after expiry of sixty days. It may be on undertaking for attending the case on all future dates. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma