IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15686 of 2009 1. KAILASH MISHRA 2. PREM KUMAR MISHRA 3. SMT. LAXAMI DEVI 4. VIJAY MISHRA ----------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 25.8.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application as during the pendency of this application, petitioner nos.1 and 4 have been arrested. This application is permitted to be withdrawn as it has become infructuous as against petitioner nos. 1 and 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are Bhaisoor and his wife. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that a vague allegation has been levelled against them also but it was the husband who brought back his wife. Thereafter whereabout of his wife not appeared in the knowledge of her parents’ family. The allegation is about her remaining several days in Delhi due to act of the in-laws including - 2 - the petitioners. Elder brothers and the wife may have some hand in demand but that is doubted if younger comes as stress will be to realise the dowry from youngest one. In the case, husband and father in law of the deceased are in jail custody. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner nos.2 and 3 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Bochahan P.S.Case no. 113/05, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI