11 ^y-HE—JS ^" i^. sn^i w h-fi* TWT 3n^Ts^*li<ft 'TSEr-^l'41<yl'4, ®tTly'is,Rcii'yy *II*ICTI a»Ni<*> "^200 311^1 TR;R (lyf^«l<it() SWIW ^lft3 BII^ff (Sinale Bench; Hon'ble Mr. Writ Petition PETITIONER Sujit about Bilaspur, Versus Ku(nar Jha, S/o Shri Harinath Jha, aged 29) years, R/o Ganesh Chowk, Nehru Nagar, rahsil <& District Bilaspur (C.6.) RESPONbENTS 1. State of Departmet 2. bistrict Administrl 3. Court Sufl Bilaspur (4 ^hhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Law it, b.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C6) <& Session Judge, Bilaspur (In itive Capacity) District Bilaspur. jerintendent, District and Session Judge, :<tG) 31.1.2009 Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advoc) Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adv. G\ Heard. Grievance of the petitionet) license to drive light motor vehicl the last three years. The peti- 18.8.2008 applied for appointmenl in the office of respondent No. other persons have been called fo for appointment on the post of 4>l^I<rl41'r1 ^Wcff'^Ts^l <^'t-s^ '^sTfinan^r Justice bhirendra Mishra) s] No.609/09 ite for the petitioner. ;neral for the State. is that he is having valid driving ss and he is working as driver for lioner vide Annexure P-5 dated |as Class-IV Daily Wage Employee ?, however, when he learnt that ih interview to be held on 1.2.20Q9 |Contingent Paid Drjver, he aga.in 1+ il / .i-^'S^:. •:,:. lt t T • :'S^»H...:*. .;:' fS # .:',<-.XI-HG—78 'STT^T ^T f<HI<*> ^V 3T1^Tsfi*| 3>' 'T5? -4141<ylAI, anl'M'ic, [SI<'II'MI< Wqdl »>*11<t> ;Wt 200 SV^f TR^ (iqt^'Ki'T) TOIWR ^ri^i sn^t applied on 27.1.2009 vide Annexul' not been issued call-letter. Learned counsel for the pe|t may be disposed of with a directif candidature of the petitioner Driver along with other candidatet of Annexure P-5 & P-7. On the other hand, learnefd that in case the petitioner has af within time and he is found el appointment on the post of t)r'\\ considered. In view of the above subml parties, the instant petition is respondent No.2 herein to also in case he has filed the af of Contingent Paid Driver within purpose and further that he verification. Certified copy today. *i<(I<-i'fl-< 'v^i ^ fe%t ^re?R ^sifinOT^ii e P-7 for appointment but he has ritioner submits that this petition >n to respondent No.2 to consider or the post of Contingent Paid in view of his earlier applications counsel for the State submits if^plied before the respondent No.2 ;l|gible after due verification for \er, his candidature may also be ijssions of learned counsel for the [disposed of with a direction to consicjer candidature of the petitioner ippli^ition for appointment on the post |'he time specified for the above |is found to be eligible after Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge a' •^. ^