'^ -Nl ^- (3) (4) ^f^ •") MIPBE HDN'BLE M.P. STATS ADMIIISF['RAT£Mjrai@H^ ^NGH AT BATPUR (M<P<) (^pwj^l MaEiharan Singh Banafar^ S/o Sri ^&^_^&^-_-Sm^_ PreTiously Assistant Sub-Inspector Police StatioB Hevai Presently Head Gonstable Poliee Station Jamul District DURG (M.P.) Versus (1) S-fcate OfM.P. Throagh the Chief Secretary Departaent of Home Ministry Secretariate BHOPAL (M.P.) (2) The Inspeotor GeneraJ. of Police Applicant Poliee Head Gountor<^uAn'^^ BHOPAL (M.P.) •^- The Deputy Inspector General of Police Baipur Begion RAIPUB (M.P.) The Superintendent of Police Distriet DUSG (M.P.) Noa-Applicants ^PPLICATIOI UNDEB SECTIOH 19 OF THE ADMXSISTRATITB - T.RIBUNAL ACT, 198ff~ EC—78 ^^n^^T'RpTw ^n^n^T'^i^w Kamdet •^ (^ 's^ ^ww^, ^nl •(-i^ito, [si<ni<-i<j,< ^.M:.f..:.(-.^ ^TITWg»^It^"""v"""""'"""<l""""K'<'*WY"""""ff;t^200 ^n^FT Tra^ (^^3^?) IT^TTW^ft^ ^H^T S-B-: Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra 4-5-2010 No one appearsfor the p< Shri Chandresh Shrivast^va The matter was passefl representation on behalf of the No one appears for the p^ S.P.C. was also issued tc^ In the circumstance, Court but to dismiss the writ The writ petition isdismis| over once in absence of any ?etitioner. tioner eveh in the second call. jthepetitioner. is no other option left with the pet|tion for want of prosecution. ^ed fbr want 6f prosecution. the^e .Ui'- ii~}H [^. .nn' ^Frf^ft^ ^lR^ff ^ 1^21 'if^l^K '^3^fw^Tt^T •titioner. i, Panel Lawyer for the State. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge ?;?.; -n 60 'OF W3 01 <jF