Cj^- /-~3-0 INTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPU] CHHATTISGARH WMT PETITION (S)NQ. ^199 /2006 N.K. Panigrahi,. ' S/o- Shri Janardan Panigrahi Aged about 59 'A years, •• presently working as Deputy Ranger, r'"^/ /Bakawand Range, Bastar Forest Division "<^7 / Distt. Bastar, ^<?/ / Chhattisgarh. °?%y/ ,/yf PETITIONER ..f .<?' .<t-' t? ^>" 2. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh/ Through- Priacipal Secretary, Deptt. ofForest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Divisional Forest Officer,« Bastar Forest Division,- Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE^26?22% OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR JSSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERT!ORARI ETC. I* XI-HC-78 sn^rqff^ieh awsn^Taiifw ^- <TTHC(Ta>*1T^ ?sg'?2TTin?pr, aTflu'ia, [s|(fliwy ^, f.KW-^V^I'L'"-^ ••• WT 200 3TT^?T<<s(t*) (t^i^fT) ??gTWflf??Tsn^T 11-8-2006 Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, c| Mrs; Anju Ahuja, Deputy on advance copy: Heard both the counse!. By the instant writ petitior| of india, the petitioner has cha!!^ (Annexure P-1) passed by been transferrsd from Bakawanci Grievance of the petitioni going to retire on 31 April months' service. Learned counse! for the are !eft for the petitioner's the smpioyees who are about tq be subjected to transfer, as the ^ orocessed. Learned counsel allowed to make a reoresentati No.1 be directsd to decide the si for the State/ respondents has nc Having heard learned coi the facts and cireumstances of counsei for the petitioner app Therefore, ,the petitioner is a!!ow respondent No.1 ralsing all his 9 wri.t petltion and its annexures w ^unsel for the petitioner. Sovt. Advocate for the State/respondents, under Articie 226/227 of the Constitution snged his transfer order dated 17-1-2006 No.1, whereby the petitioner has Range to Bijapur Forest Division. w raised in this writ petition is that he is ', thereby he has only ieft with eight resplondent 2(S07 ^rafcNt^ wraY if teifl-T^TFZTC ^STf^lTSn^T retlretnent fietitioner submits that only eight months and as per the Government policy, retire within one year, sha!! not normally fension case of the emDiovees have to be fijrther submits that the petitioner may'be |on to respondent No.4 and respondent ^me, to which learned counsei appearing ^ objectlon. |nsel for the parties and having regard to the case, the prayer made by learned jears to be just, fair and reasonable. ^ed to make a detaiied representation to ^rievances, annexing a copy qf the snstant ifthin a period of ten days from today and P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3 r '^i'iiid'ti, yiTflu'is, [siditiy +11*1WI a>»IT^t ^, p. MD , ^\\ct1^ 1-"c(> wr 200 3TT^?T 4a<ti (i^ci(^s)qiSr) Sn^TqiTf^IR) crar STT^T»H Soma ^ 'tft '<» <^> OTHWflfN'sn^r —2- irectdd in turn, respondent No.1 is dii one month from the date of its raised by the petitioner in an obj^ctive Till the representation of the petiti<t if he has not already been relievecfl. With the aforesaid directionl Consequsntly, SVI.(W.)P.No| stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for certiffed copy of this order 'bl'ilfi-l'lfl-l t<lti<'fTifteT^t<Rl<^K ^srf^TSIT^T to decide the same within a period of |receipt, considering a!l the grievances manner, in accordance with law. ^ner is decided, he shall not be relieved, the writ petition stands disposed of. 3257/2006 and i.A.No.7733/2006 aiso Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. I*