Crl. Misc. No. M-36784 of 2010 [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-36784 of 2010 Date of Decision: January 6, 2011 Himanshu Garg ................................................................ Petitioner Versus M/s Priknit Retails Ltd. and another ........................ Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.R.S.Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing of complaint No. 670/2 dated 2.7.2010 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After going through the complaint, a case for entertaining it under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is prima facie made out in view of the law laid down in State of Haryana and others v. Ch. Bhajan Lal & Others AIR 1992 SC 604 and Som Mittal v. Government of Karnataka (2008) 3 Supreme Court Cases 574. Without going into the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to raise all the points as have Crl. Misc. No. M-36784 of 2010 [ 2 ] been raised in this petition before the trial Court during the course of proceedings in the complaint. Personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is exempted subject to the following conditions:- (i) petitioner shall be represented through counsel; (ii) shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings; (iii) shall not dispute his identity as an accused; (iv) shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in his absence but in the presence of his counsel; (v) shall appear before the trial Court as and when required by the trial Court; and (vi) any other condition which the learned trial Court may impose. 6.1.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE