IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14491 of 2009 DILIP MAHTO, son of Janardan Mahto, resident of village – Mungeriganj, P.S. Begusarai Town, Dist. Begusarai. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 03.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. FIR was instituted against unknown under sections 461 and 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code which is Begusarai Town P S Case no. 261 of 2004. It is stated that name of the petitioner has come during the course of investigation. The role came to be assigned to him with regard to theft of mustard oil. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no recovery so as to connect the petitioner with the crime in question and he has surrendered on coming to know of his name during the course of investigation on 26.2.2009. It is submitted that in view of the kind of evidence which has emerged and the conduct of the petitioner, he may be enlarged on bail. In the totality of the circumstances, let the petitioner Dilip Mahto be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Begusarai Town P S Case No. 261 of 2004 with a direction that one of the surety will be executed by the father of the petitioner, namely Janardan Mahto on due - 2 - identification by the court below and the other by an elected representative of the Village Panchayat. It is further directed that petitioner will appear in person on each and every date in the trial. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)