• •— —«£aiE;^ BBB 4 !'- i. © ^.^^ •€^ '^ IN THE HIGH COITRT OP JUDICATURE AT BIIA8FUR. CHHATTISGARH WMT^EH'nONNa3^z- OF 2004 PETITIONER: .^^ €^^ ^^^' ^ RESPONDENT8: t\ .1 ^li b^J ^..^ [^ Nan Sfli Minj, S/0. Late Shri Dhaaiya KBnjyAged About 37 Years, Ghief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Kusmii, Tah. & Poat: Kusmi, Sub Division Ramanujgaqj, Distt. Surguja (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through: Principal Secretary, Govemment of Chhatdagarh, Department of Tribal Development, D.K.S.Bhawan Mantralaya»Diatdct Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 2. Collector, Ambikapur, Distnct Surguja(Chhatdsgarh) 3. Assistant Comiiussioner, Tribal Welfare DepartmCTity Collectorate, Ambikapur, District Surgaja> (Chhattisgarh) 4. Chief Executive Officer, 231a Paiichayat, Aaibikapiir, Distdct Surguja CUhattisgarh 5. Shri B.S.Rathod, aged about 49 years Chief ESxecutive Ofi&cer, Qfi&ce ofAssistant Commissioner Tdbal WeUiare, Ambikapur, District Surguja (Chhattisgarb) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OP THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA ^s^ ^ft^^ ^^ 4..s^ Ht6H COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No. 3552 of 2004 Petitioner Nan Saj Minj Versus Respondents State of Chhatisgarh and others SB: Hon'bte Mr. Jusfice Satish K. Agnlhotri, J Shri Alok Barik, Advocate for fr»@potjfioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the respondents No. 1 to 4. ORDER (Passed on this 26th day of February, 2007) 1. Leamed counset appearing for the petitioner, on instruction, seeks for permissjon of this Court to withdraw this petitjon, on ttie ground that the retief sought for m this petito'on has alreacty been granted bytherespondents. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection. 3. The pefition is djsmissed as withdrawn. — Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur