HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSSARH AT BiLASPUR Cr.^.P.No.876of291S Fetiiioners 1. Bhupendra Sir.gh, S/o. Shri D.S.Thakur, AppHcants aged about 38 years, Reader, Civi! Court, Beejapur (C.G.) 2. Mohd. Aashique Siddiqui, S/o. iate Abdui Mazid Siddiqui, aged about 28 years, Occupation-Advocate, Civil C-ourt Dantewada, Distt.C'aniewada (C.G.) Vsrsus Respondenf State of Chhattisgarh, Through: District Prosecution Magistrate Dantewada, Distt.Dantewada (C.G.) (Petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.) (SB: Hon'bie iVir. T.P. Sharma, J.) Present:- ivir.Shrawan Agrawai, counsei for ths petitionsrs. iVir.R.K.Jha, Dy.Govt.Advocaie forthe State. ORDERiORAl (Passed on 4 February, 201 1) 1. By this petition under Secticn 482 of ths Cr.P.C., ths petitioners have chaitenged isgality and propriety of the order dated 8.10.2010 passed by the Sessions Judge, South Bastar Dantsv.'ada in Criminai Revision No.21/2010, affirming the order dated 10.9.2010 passed by ths Chief Judiciai iyiagistrate, Dantswada in Crimmai Case No.324/2009 v.'hersby iearned Chief Judiciai Mag'.strate has direcisd for providing spsdmen signatire iiks disputed forged signaiurs. 2. i have heard tearnsd counse! for the parties, perused the ortisr impugnsd, order ofthe iriai Court other documents fiied on cshaif ofthe petitionsrs. 3. Learned counsei for the pstitioners submits thaf in ordsr to sxamine the signature and handwriiing of ihs petitioners the prosecution te required to send admitisd signaturs snd hsRdwritsng aiong with spscimsn hand'A'riting and signature to expert, but investsgating officer or ths Court is not empowered to corrspei ths peiiiiorsers for giving specimen iike forged signature. Learnsd counsel further submits that the pstltioners are aggrieved onty part of direction reiating to providirsg specimen iike forgsd signature. 4. On She othsr hand, iearned State counset opposes tns peSt'on. :'.-: 'a;A "'%, r /••' "v %. rj' %s.''"•».. '8 I '<^S| J ^ .. yi' ^" K Av a' ^ ^wr^' »y ''^&h. 'Ws!'"" ^'sy t!&.^y' 5. Definstsiy th®prsssnt petitionsrs ars accused. Wsth a view to examine forged documents, investigating officer is required to obtain admitted writing and docurrssnts aiong v/sth specimen writing and signature but the accussti cannot be compeiied for making any signature iik®forgsd signsture. S. Corisequsntiy, the petition is partiy aiio'A'ed. Psiitionsrs' specimen signaturs may be obtsinsd by the investigating officsr and thsy may aiso obtain admitted undisputed signature from other documenis. 7 lA??Tri rhi With this obssrvation, ths petition siands disposed of Certified copy as per ruiss. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge /