IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6088 of 2011 Jayendra Kumar, s/o- Late Nandu Singh, r/o- village Korari, P.S.- Nagar, Nausha, District- Nalanda. …….. Petitioner. Versus 1. The Union Of India through the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi. 2. The Director General of C.R.P.F., CRPF Head Quarter, New Delhi. 3. The Inspector General, Bihar Sector, C.R.P.F., Patna. 4. The D.I.G., C.R.P.F., Mokama Ghat, District- Patna. 5. The D.I.G., C.R.P.F., Muzaffarpur. 6. The Commandant, C.R.P.F., Group Centre, C.R.P.F., Mokama Ghat, District- Patna. 7. The Commandant, Recruitment Board, Group Centre, Muzaffarpur. ---------------------------------- 4 19.08.2011 Petitioner seeks appropriate order/direction to quash office order dated 30.10.2010 (Annexure-2) whereby his selection as Constable (G.D.) in Central Reserve Police Force (for short “ the CRPF”) was annulled on the ground that the educational certificate of Madhyama issued by Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna was not recognized for the purpose of employment in the Central Government in general and CRPF in particular. Mr. Raghib Ahsan, learned Assistant Solicitor General states that the appropriate authority/Government invoking jurisdiction conferred under Section 18(1) of the CRPF Act, have framed rules whereby the aforesaid Institution/Board has been recognized since the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna has the affiliation/recognition granted by the State Government. It is contended that the said change in law was made effective w.e.f. 22.7.2010. It appears that the petitioner claims to have been selected for appointment in the Force w.e.f. 2.8.2010. 2 In the light of said submission, this Court permits the petitioner to file a detail representation before the respondent No. 4 (The D.I.G., C.R.P.F., Mokama Ghat, District- Patna) within four weeks from today together with a copy of the present order. If any such representation/application is filed in the manner stated above, the concerned respondent shall consider and dispose of his representation in accordance with law by a speaking order. If the said respondent finds that the educational qualification of the petitioner is acceptable to the CRPF then appropriate order shall also be passed without further loss of time. The application stands disposed of. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)