IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19038 of 2010 RANJAN CHOUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 26.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail since 04.12.2010 in a case registered under sections 461, 371 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner’s name subsequently sprang up in the statement of other accused and on the statement of the petitioner the stolen inverter was recovered. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no recovery has been made from possession of the petitioner and actually recovery has been made on the statement of other accused persons and not on the statement of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the two other cases have been filed against the petitioner by the agnates of the petitioner. Considering the fact that no recovery has been made from possession of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in Kamtaul P.S. Case No. 62 of 2010. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate will not accept the bail - 2 - bond of the petitioner if he is involved in more than two cases apart from the present one. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) BTiwary/