1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Seventh day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15827 of 2011 1.VELMURUGAN 2.K. NAGARAJAN 3.P. MUTHUPANDI 4.(*)NAGANATHAN 5.E.S. BALAMURUGAN 6.VEERAMANI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C5. KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.705/2009 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT (*)AMENDED AS PER THE ORDER OF THIS COURT MADE IN MP(MD)No. 1 OF 2011 IN CRL OP(MD)No15827 OF 2011 VIDE ORDER DATED: 23.12.2011 BY VPKJ., For Petitioner : M/S. S.VENKATESH Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as accused and they prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 427 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime NO.705 of 2009 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.Heard Mr.S.Venkatesah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) would submit in his argument that the co-accused had already been released on anticipatory bail by this Court on 14.10.2011 in Crl.OP(MD)No.13746 of 2011. He would further submit in his argument that no one sustained injury https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 in the alleged occurrence and the plea of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail, stringent condition may be imposed. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence and the co-accused had already been released on anticipatory bail by this Court on 14.10.2011 in Crl.OP(MD)No.13746 of 2011, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate NO.V, Madurai and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 07/12/2011 The Time already granted for surrender is extended for a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. sd/- 22/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO TO BE SUBSTITUTED TO THE ORDER ALREADY DESPATCHED: 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, MADURAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C5. KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 1. CC to M/S. S.VENKATESH Advocate SR.No.45742: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15827 of 2011 Date :07/12/2011 TR : 10.12.2011: 2p/6c DM::2011:DECEMBER:27:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/