HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G.S. SINGHVI AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD Writ Appeal No.347 of 2006 Between: Mrs.Babita Agarwal and others … Appellants And C. Ramakrishna and others … Respondents ::JUDGMENT:: Counsel for the appellants: Sri C. Kodanda Ram Counsel for respondents No.1 to 4: Not necessary parties Counsel for respondent No.5: Government Pleader for Land Acquisition. Counsel for respondent No.6: Sri P. Rajagopala Rao March 28, 2006 Per G.S. Singhvi, CJ Feeling aggrieved by order dated 10-2-2006 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.27901 of 2005 whereby he rejected their challenge to the acquisition of land, the appellants have filed this appeal. Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the question of law which arises for determination in this appeal is identical to the one raised in Writ Appeal No.336 of 2006, which has been disposed of by a separate order of today. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel, this appeal is disposed of in terms of the order passed in Writ Appeal No.336 of 2006. The detailed reasons recorded and directions given in that order shall be read as part of this order. While disposing of the appeal in the manner indicated above, we may mention that Sri C. Ramakrishna and three others, who had filed Writ Petition No.27901 of 2005 along with the present appellants, separately challenged the order of the learned Single Judge in Writ Appeal No.240 of 2006, which was disposed of by a coordinate Bench on 14-3-2006. G.S. SINGHVI, CJ G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J March 28, 2006 svs