//^- HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Writ Petition (Art. 2271 No.4471 of 2010 PETITIONERS: RESPONDENTS: M- 1. Siya Ram, S/o late Ramsewak, aged about 47 years; 2. Mewa Lal, S/o late Ramsewak, aged about 52 years; 3. Sita Ram, S/o late Ramsewak, aged about 42 years; 4. Panchu Ram, S/o late Ramsewak, aged about 40 years; 5. Ramkishan, S/o late Ramsewak, aged about 37 years; 6. Vimla, Wd/o late Ramsewak, aged about 68 years; All resident of village Chainpur, Tehsil Manendragarh, District Koriya (C.G.) (legal heirs of late Ramsewak - non- applicant No.1 before the Board of Revenue) Versus Smt. Kanta Devi Banwari Lal; Saraf, Wd/o late 2. Anand Saraf, S/o late Banwari Lal; 3. Both R/o near Sharma Printing Press, Manendragarh, District Koriya (C.G.) Mahaveer Prasad Agrawal, S/o late Omprakash Agrawal, R/o Fawwara Chowk, Manendragarh, District Koriya (C.G.) (Applicants Revenue) before the Board of 4. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector District Koriya (c.G.) (Non-applicant No.2 before the Board of Revenue) {Writ petition underArticle 227 ofthe Constitution of India} Present: Mr. Adil Minhaj, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Shakti Raj Sinha, counsel for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Bhaskar Payashi, counsel for respondent No.3. Mr. Akhil Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.4. Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J .1 SDma ORDER (1-11-2011) 1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 20-4- 2010 passed by the Board of Revenue, Bilaspur, in Revision Case No.RN/ 11/R-A-39/137/2010. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the course of hearing and before the conclusion of hearing before the Board of Revenue, non-applicant No.1 before the Board of Revenue namely Ramsewak died on 13-2-2010 and without impleading the legal representatives of Ramsewak, thepetitioners herein, the Board of Revenue has passed the order impugned. 3. The order impugned reveals that till the date of order, Ramsewak was represented by his counsel Mr. G.P. Soni & Mrs. Sadhna Jaiswal, but the fact remains, as informed by learned counsel for the petitioners, that Ramsewak died on 13-2-2010 before the conclusion of arguments. 4. In these circumstances, the petition stands disposed ofwith the observation that the petitioners herein may file appropriate petition before the Board of Revenue for impleading them as necessary party and for reviewing the order on the ground that it has been passed against a dead person. No order as to costs. §^y. T.P. Sharma Judge ^^-