1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1493 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3744 OF 2010 Bhairav Enterprises .. Appellants. Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation and anr .. Respondents. Mr.P.M.Bhagat, for the appellants. None for the respondents. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 15/11/2010. PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants. None appears for the respondents, though served. 2. In this appeal, the appellants have impugned the order dated 11.8.2010 passed by the Employees' Insurance Court, Mumbai, rejecting the application at Exhibit-1 filed by the appellants under section 75(2B) of the Employees State Insurance Act,1948 read with Rule 13 of the Bombay Employees' Insurance Courts Rules, 1959. By this application, the appellants had prayed for waiver of the amount which they were liable to pay as per the order dated 16.6.2003 passed under section 45A of the Employees' State Insurance Act,1948. Learned counsel for T 2 the appellants submitted that, prima facie, the order dated 16.6.2003 is wrong and is contrary to the written say filed by the respondents. I have perused the order so also the other material to which my attention was invited by the learned counsel for the appellants. The court below has recorded its findings in paragraphs 28,29 and 30 of the judgment impugned in this appeal. From bare perusal of the findings recorded in these three paragraphs, it is clear that the Insurance Court has considered the case of the appellant in proper perspective and it deserves no interference by this court in the present appeal. Hence, the First Appeal is dismissed. The civil application also stands disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.)