IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.O.P.C. No. 130 of 2010. Decided on 30.07. 2010. _____________________________________________________ Bansi Lal. …Petitioner. -Versus- Dr. Srikant Baldi and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): In this case, the only direction issued by this Court vide judgment dated 29.03.2010 was to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Pracharya. Mr. R.K. Sharma, learned Senior Additional Advocate General submits that the case of the petitioner has already been considered and if found suitable, he will be promoted to the post of Prahcharya. 2. In view of this fair stand adopted by the respondents, the petition stands disposed of. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits, in case he is promoted to the post in question. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 30, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?