IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-22334 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 13, 2009 Nirbhay Singh @ Deepa ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : Mr. Navjeet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.B.S.Teji, AAG, Punjab. *** S.D. Anand, J. The petitioner is facing trial in case FIR No.107 dated 24.06.2007, under Sections 15, 61, 85 of the NDPS Act, P.S. Raikot, Ludhiana. His evidence was ordered to be closed by the learned Trial Court. He came up in revision with a precise presentation that he was to examine only one witness i.e. Record Keeper/Superintendent of DGP Office, Chandigarh with the indicated record. The motion order categorically states that the witness aforementioned was allowed to be examined on a presentation that no other witness was required to be examined. It being common ground that the Record Keeper aforementioned has already been examined, no further orders are either pressed or required in this petition. Disposed of accordingly. October 13, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vinod Judge