^-s k^-^^r ^-^5^^-" 3ira^j» Rfflns ^sN^i.^ usiiis •<an @%Svt i^'.-'f ^ ^....-••^"" 6F/<^2^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 2-6 o /200S -^- Petitioner : { Ramesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Battu Prasad Sharina, Aged about 39 years, Asst. Teacher, Prathmik Shala Sainnapur, Block - Kawardha, District Kabirdhasi (C.G.) Versus Resuondents rt':.)^ {^'^ ,^ <fl /'!. State of Chliattisgarh Through : Secretary School Education Department; D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer Kabirdham (C.G.) 3. Block Education 0£5cer Block - Kawardha, District - Kabirdham (C.G.) ^' a>- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/^7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFJNDIA -''^-"y i to ^^//l'^ l<'*l-'i o. ^^ HI^) COURT Cff CHHATHSSARH AT BIUSPUR W. P. fS) No. 260 of 2007 Petitioner : Ramesh Kumar Sho.rma Versus Sta'te of Chhattisgarh ish K. AgnihotPi. J Wr. Cieepak Jain, Advocate for -the petitioner. Miss Sunita Jain, Panel iawyer for the respondents/State. OR DER (Passed on 19tb day of Jonuary, 2007) The following order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. Leamed counsel cppearing for the petitioner as vuell as learned Panel tawyer oppeoring fop the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts of the pre^nt ca»are similar to that of in W. P. (5) 7002 of 2006 (Yogeshwar Prasad Pataniwr Vs. State of Chhattisgarh A others), which wais diiposed of vids order dated 15 Deceinber, 2006. They further submit that the question of law involved is aiso the wme. Bablu 2. In view of th®cfcove stated ajbmissions made by learned counse! for the parties, the writ petition is dispo^d of in terms of the order dated 15th Eiacember, 200& passed by -this Court in W. P. (s) 7002 of 2006. No order os to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge