hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8764 OF 2009 Sou, Usha Rampramod Kulkarni ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Vijay Killedar for Petitioner. Mrs. S.S. Bhende, A.G.P. For R. no. 1. Mr. Tushar Pimple for R. No. 2. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 07, 2009 P.C. It is the case of the Petitioner that he is the senior most teacher and as such on the vacancy arising for the post of Head Mistress, Petitioner should have been appointed as incharge. Instead of that Respondent No. 4 has been appointed. Petitioner has been making representations but the same has not been considered. Reply has been filed on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 by Mr. A.M. Suryawanshi. Petitioner No. 2 has been represented but no notice has been served on Respondent No. 4. In the affidavit, petitioners point that the post is isolated and there is no reservation and Petitioner has been senior most has been accepted. In view of the above, Petition can be disposed of by issuing the following directions : Respondent No. 3 to reconsider the case of the Petitioner and Respondent No. 4 and after hearing Petitioner, Respondent No. 2 and Respondent No. 4 to pass appropriate orders according to law at any rate before 31st January, 2010. With the above observations Petition disposed of. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (F,I. REBELLO,J.)