IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24395 of 2003 Between: 1 Smt. B. Subbalakshmamma, C/o. B.V.S. Narayana, Founder Trustee of Sri Mitta Papaiah Choultry, Sivalayam Street, Proddutur, Cuddapah District. 2 Smt. B. Naga Kumari, W/o. B.V.S. Narayana, Nehru Road, Proddutur, Cuddapah District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Endowments) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Endowments, Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad. 3 The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Cuddapah. 4 The Executive Officer, Group of Temples-II Circle, Proddutur, Cuddapah District. 5 B. Munikrishnaiah, S/o. Gopal Rao, R/o. H.No. 6/3, Gandhi Road, Proddutur, Cuddapah District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of "Writ of Certiorari" calling for the records vide Memo No. 47798/Endts. II (I)/2000-7, dt: 13-3-2003 issued by the 1st respondent and quash the same is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent to implement the 2nd respondent's proceedings vide Notice No. M3/53219/98, dt: 30.7.1999; Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.N.GURU GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : MR.N.VENUGOPALA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.5: MR.KARNAMRAMESH The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of "Writ of Certiorari" calling for the records vide Memo No. 47798/Endts. II (I)/2000-7, dt: 13.3.2003 issued by the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to implement the 2nd respondent's proceedings vide Notice No. M3/53219/98, dt: 30.7.1999 and to pass such other order or orders.” At the hearing, Ms.Ch.Kanaka Durga, learned counsel representing Sri N.Guru Gopal, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 15.11.2008 va