1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.255 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1254 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.256 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1255 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.257 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1256 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.258 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1257 OF 2010 Satish Tandon .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents Mr. Abhaykumar Apte and Ms. Deepa Malwankar, Advocates for applicant. 2 Mr. P.H. Kantharia, APP for State. Mr. M.V. Swar for respondent no.2. Coram : Smt. R.P.SondurBaldota, J. Date : 15th July, 2011 P.C. 1. These applications are the second attempt on the part of the applicant seeking modification of the order dated 24th November 2010. The first attempt was by filing Criminal Applications No. 502 of 2010, 503 of 2010, 504 of 2010 and 505 of 2010, which are disposed off in view of the fact that the main petitions, in which the applications were filed were already disposed off. 2. The order dated 24th November 2010 was passed in criminal application filed by the applicant for reduction of the amount of deposit as condition precedent imposed by the Sessions Court for grant of bail in the criminal appeals filed by the applicant. The Sessions Court had directed the applicant to deposit 25% of the compensation awarded by the trial Court. This Court, by its order dated 24th November 2010, reduced the amount to 15% in all the cases, with further directions that the amount will be paid within four weeks from that day. The applicant did not comply 3 with the order dated 24th November 2010, but filed the applications, for extension some time in February 2011. Thereafter the present applications have been filed for modification to permit the applicant to deposit an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- every fortnight to the amount of 15% of the total amount of fine in all the cases is realised. The applicant so far as deposited only 2,00,000/- in this Court leaving the balance of Rs.8,70,000/-. 3. The learned counsel for the respondents points out that the applicant has been merely filing one application after another only with the purpose of delaying the deposit of the amount directed by the Court, so that in the meantime, the appeal before the Sessions Court is heard. This Court, by its order dated 24th November 2010 has expedited the hearing of the appeal. Considering the conduct of the applicant, all the applications are dismissed. (Smt. R.P .SondurBaldota, J)