1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.7982/2002. : : Panna Lal Vs. District & Sessions Judge, Jaipur. : : Date of Order 18.3.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. S.N.Meena for the petitioner. Mr. Zakir Hussain, Addl.Govt.Counsel for the State. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved by his non-appointment. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that name of the petitioner was mentioned at Serial No.25 in the merit list, whereas the respondents have appointed only 20 candidates. It was contended that vacant posts are available but the respondents did not make further appointments. It was contended that reservation policy of the State has also not been adhered to. If that was done, three of Scheduled Tribe category candidates could be appointed whereas only two candidates have been appointed. The respondents in reply to the writ petition have contended that only 20 appointments were given and there is 2 no other vacant post available with the respondents, therefore, the contention that five more posts were available is absolutely baseless. These candidates were appointed in ST category and both were above the petitioner in the merit list. Validity of penal was expired one year after preparation on 12.8.2000. In view of the clarification made by the respondents, I do not find any case for issuance of writ of mandamus as prayed for. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.76.