1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICMTURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 1657 of 2007 Hemraj v. The State of Mah. And ors Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr G.N. Khanzode, Adv for petitioner Mr A.Y. Kapgate, Adv for respondent no.2 Coram: R.V. More, J Dated : 14th February 2008 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner; learned AGP for respondents no. 1 & 2 and learned counsel for respondent no. 2. 2. Petitioner was working as Village Development Officer in Zilla Parishad, Gondia. For the serious irregularities in implementation of the Centrally sponsored scheme viz. Jawahar Gram Samruddhi Yojana which was merged into Ashwasit Gramin Rojgar Yojana and later on into Sampurnana Gramin Rojgar Yojna, the petitioner was charge- sheeted and departmental enquiry was initiated 2 against him. The departmental enquiry was conducted by the Assistant Commissioner (Enquiries) and out of four serious charges, two are held to be fully proved and remaining two are held to be proved partially. 3. On the basis of enquiry report, the Chief Executive Officer, Z.P., Gondia issued show-cause notice to the petitioner for the proposed punishment of compulsory retirement and after hearing him, inflicted upon him the punishment of compulsory retirement vide order dated 30.6.2004. As the disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner, his request for voluntary retirement was not considered by the Chief Executive Officer. Petitioner's departmental appeal against the above order before the Divisional Commissioner also came to be dismissed by an order impugned in the present writ petition. 4. Accusation against the petitioner was that – (1) he had prepared false muster-roll of construction site; (2) signatures and thumb impressions on the 3 muster-roll as also coupon distribution register were found to be fabricated; (3) wages of the workers were not drawn as per actual measurement and wages were not fully distributed and (4) food-grain coupons were not factually disbursed to the workers. After holding detailed enquiry, it has been concluded that first two charges were partially proved and remaining charges were fully proved. On perusal of the enquiry report; order of the disciplinary authority and the one passed by the appellate authority, I am of the opinion that no case is made out for any interference in my jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India especially when two serious charges were admitted by the petitioner. Petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Judge. hsj