IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1980 of 2011 MD. MINTU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 01.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named in the first information report and he was caught by the informant and police officials while he was trying to flee from the place of occurrence after committing loot in the office of Gold Mine Agro Limited and allegedly, rupees five thousand and fire arm were recovered from his conscious possession. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that for the recovery of fire arm, a separate case has been instituted against the petitioner and so far as recovery of cash is concerned, as a matter of fact, the petitioner had withdrawn the aforesaid amount from A.T.M. one day prior to the alleged occurrence. It is also pointed out by him that one co-accused from whose possession rupees eighteen thousand has been recovered has already been granted privilege of bail by the learned court below itself. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I do not feel it proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Siwan Town P.S. Case No. 183 of 2010, stands rejected. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )