IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.7285 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 10.12.2009 Pardeep Kumar and others .....Petitioners versus Lucky Sethi .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Ms.Sujita Raj, Advocate and Mr.Peeush Gagneja, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is preferred by the landlords against the order dated 10.9.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Fazilka, whereby despite their claim that the monthly rent of the demised premises is Rs.1000/-, the provisional rent has been assessed @ Rs.500/- per month. It may be noticed here that according to the respondent-tenant, the monthly rent is Rs.400/-. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the considered view that since the rent has been assessed by the Rent Controller provisionally, there is no occasion for this Court to interfere with the impugned order. At the same time, the Rent Controller, Fazilka, is C.R. No.7285 of 2009 (O&M) 2 obligated to take necessary steps to ensure that if the rent is proved by the landlords to be Rs.1000/- per month, the arrears can be effectively recovered from the petitioner-tenant. In this view of the matter, this revision petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to move a fresh application before the Rent Controller seeking direction to the tenant to furnish adequate security to the satisfaction of the Rent Controller for the difference in the amount of rent claimed by the landlords or provisionally assessed by the Rent Controller. Necessary orders shall be passed by the Rent Controller on that application within a period of one month from the date of its filing. Disposed of. Dasti. 10-12-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE