g v \w V@%ngle awash IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) w.P. (S) No. étf Li u /2011 i PETITIONER : V' Prem Narayan Yadav, S/o. Shri Madho Ram Yadav, aged about 46 years, working as Compounda", presently posted as District Ayurvedic Dispensaly, Sewar, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS ESPONDENTS: ,(1) State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretaxy, Health and Family Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan Ralpur (C G ) §£§/ . ..... ’ wUnder Secretaly Govt. of Chhattisgarh Health and Family Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / (3) Director, Department of AYUSH, Old Nurses Hostel, Behind Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (4) District Ayurved Officer, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) (5) District Ayurved Officer, Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The Petitioner‘named above most respectfully submitted as under: l. PARTICULAR OF THE PETITIONERS As shown in the cause title. @ R RES3QNBE ITS Siaie of Chhaiiisgarh 8: Gihers {Wri§ ?eiiiion under kticie 22$ of i‘ne Sgnsiii'uiien of indie) Singie Bengh : Hon‘ “Sée $‘nri Saiis s K I3Kgnihm-‘i, J. se'u - rim Adi‘wa Tiwafi, Advma F \ am aao Gr‘verrment A vacaie far i‘ne :iiaie. xm . HKBH CGURT GF CHP‘QAT'ISGAQH : B§LAE§UR WW”? PE‘?iT§$N (3"; \‘O. Elia-$4 GF 26? A” Ram NaYayan ‘f’adew Vem‘ug a ‘t — QRQER (Passed an this 15‘ da sf November, 2m 4;) Chaiignge in i‘ms “emisn is i0 ihe ordef daiea‘ 2§.{}7.2m1 (Amiexure ? 1) gaa em bx: me rpspQndem Ne wrerebv me pegmenrir warking as, Comgoundef ai Gcvemmem Ayurveéic Dispensary, Sewar! Twirict ”B§§aspuf, has been iramirred is Eavemmené Ayurvesi’ic Ev apensary, mm <1 Diumc? Varga on administraiive greandg. Learnea‘ ceunséi app&ar§ng €Qr ihe peiiiiwez whmits waft €he i’ansfef is contrafy m ihe pe%§cy 0f the Staie as accer'h §o immi’er. pdzcy éaigd 43% Em; i‘aera is a smci ban or: §nier-d§sir%2’i imasEf of c3935 W; empisyee and ciass N emgaioyeea. Sir? Saa, learned Gavemm'em Ad‘mcaie awearmg k}: {he $tatei’ re vde’ls fam‘; saitxmis ihai ihe peiiéiener scum mt have haw oui of we disir as ihafe weis a ban {m inier-disir'mi éransfer sf G'*S$ i” arri mass W 9m k: E65. The said ban ha$ been removed su'asgqasmiy by memo Fahd G8 4 11 Taua m he aams m tL‘e case ihe impiigned transfer Order daée 3G1 2m“ {Ame/are PI’B 'n reams? 0? the peiiiioner may be quashed, however, iibewly may be gramed ie ihe 3'eswnslem authoriiies i0 pass appropriaie Carder in. admimsiraiive ,Jaan m4 "magic xmerebi m View s33” ihe abave, according it: iaameé csunsei ?'C\r ‘lhe peii’iiaaer, noi‘nmg $urvives for adjudicaiian. Accefdingiyi! ihe impugmea’ order dmeé 29.:372G11 (Armexure PH} resgesi cf the peiifioner is quashed reservmg iibeziy m ihe Siaie auiho;iiiee it: pese appropriaw efder in adm§n§sifaiive ex§gency am p) h‘. pa p”: eueh me’ee n s0 aei 1seci The Wm pe’ki‘aéen is dieeosed of. NO order asie coeis. e 3d]. SatiSh K. ‘1 Agnihotri Judge