IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13868 of 2010 1. KRISH NANDAN RAI S/O LATE SURTI RAI 2. BATUA ROY @ PARSURAM ROY S/O BIDHAN ROY @ BIDHANCHAND ROY 3. BIDHAN CHAND RAI @ BIDHAN RAI S/O LATE SURESH RAI 4. MITHILESH SINGH S/O LATE OMKAR ROY 5. SHAMBHU ROY @ SHAMBHU SHANKER ROY S/O LATE UMA SHANKER RAI 6. KAMLESH KUMAR 7. LALAN KUMAR BOTH S/O KRISH NANDAN ROY 8. RAKESH KUMAR @ RAKESHKUMAR ROY S/O SUBHASH CHANDRA ROY 9. SUBHASH CHANDRA ROY S/O LATE SURESH ROY 10. GAURI SHANKER ROY S/O LATE HARI ROY 11. MAKKA ROY 12. GUNJAN ROY BOTH S/O BIDHAN ROY ALL R/O VILLAGE RANNUCHAK P.S. NATHNAGAR, DISTT. BHAGALPUR 13. ANJANI KUMAR SINGH @ ANJU SINGH 14. SANJAI KUMAR SINGH @ SANJU SINGH 15. SHAILESH PD. SINGH @ SHAILESH SINGH 16. BHARAT PRASAD SINGH @ BHARTI SINGH 17. PARMA NAND SINGH @ PARO SINGH 18. CHHEDI MISTRI S/O LATE PANCHU MISTRI 19. PAPPU MISTRI 20. DILIP MISTRI BOTH S/O CHHEDI MISTRI ALL R/O VILLAGE SHAHPUR P.S. NATH NAGAR DISTT- BHAGALPUR ……….IInd Party….. Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ARBIND KUMAR ROY S/O LATE BRAHMDEO ROY OF VILLAGE RANNUCHAK P.S. NATHNAGAR, DISTT- BHAGALPUR ……….. Ist Party………. Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 14.12.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 21.12.2009 passed by S.D.M. Sadar Bhagalpur in Case No. 1035/2009, by which they have been noticed to file a written statement in proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C. Since the matter is still at the initial stage, I am not inclined to interfere in the order impugned. The application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )