IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7180 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.R.TRIPATHI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : YES 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- KANJIBHAI BABALDAS PATEL Versus ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BS PATEL for Petitioner GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 1 MR ND NANAVATI for Respondent No. 2, 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.R.TRIPATHI Date of decision: 10/11/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT The matter was called out twice. Learned advocate for the petitioner is not present. The present petition is filed against a show cause notice dated 5/10.9.1992, Annexure 'H' to the petition. By the said show cause notice certain irregularities are alleged to have been committed by the petitioner, who was Sarpanch of village Valam, Taluka Valam, District Mehsana at the relevant time. Instead of filing any reply to the said show cause notice, the petitioner approached this Court by way of the present Special Civil Application. 2. Looking to the contents of the show cause notice, nature of irregularities, the present petition cannot be entertained. No relief can be granted to the petitioner. 3. The petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged with no order as to cost. Interim relief is vacated. 10th November 2000 (Ravi R. Tripathi, J.) karim*