HEGH COURT 6F CHHATWSGAW-k BRASFUR Wi’ii Petition N0. 22$ of 2002 Juaram Patei son of Babuial Patgl, aged abEut 23 years, occupation: Teacher, t resm‘ent of Harijanjaara, Gram Panchayat, Ghutku, Block: Takhatpur, Dist Bilaspur, CG. Versus Respondents 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through R Secretary, School Education Department, D‘K. Bhawan, Ra§pur, CG. 2‘ Education Programme Officer, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Buaspur, CG. 3. Chief Executive Offi'éer, Janpad Panehayat, Takhatpur, Dist. Raipur, CG 4. Sarpanch. Vilxage Panchayat, Ghuiku, Bbek: Takhatpur, Dist. Bilaspirr, CG. kw; w (Writ Petition under Articie 2261227 of ihe Constitution of lndia‘)‘ SB: Hon’bie Shri Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Shri Shaiiesh AhLiia counsel for the petitioner KL Suriita Jain, Panei Lawyer for respendents No. ‘i to 3/State: ‘Present: i. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the return tiled by respondents No. 1, 2 and 3, nothing survives in the matter as the relief sought for in this petition has aiready been granted by respondents No. ’i, 2 and 3. Thus, this petition has become infructuous, to which the learned counsei appearing for ihe Statelrespondenis No. ”i to 3 has no objection. is ordered acoordingiyr 2. it 3. The petition is dismissed as having become infructuous No order as to costs. Raiu OREL URDER (.Passed an 3““ May? 2m?) Sd/- Satish K, Agmhom Judge Petitioner