IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 7TH JANUARY 2008 / 17TH POUSHA 1929 RP.No. 1067 of 2007(C) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.26488/2007 Dated 05/09/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------- A. SYED SAHABUDEEN, S/O. G.AMEER PULAVAR, PULAVAR MANAI, METTUPALAYAM STREET, PALAKKAD, PIN-678 001. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR AS LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER FOR THE DISTRICT, PALAKKAD. 4. SECRETARY, MOTOR VEHICLES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, PALAKKAD. 6. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD. 7. PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PALAKKAD. 8. PALAKKAD MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, PALAKKAD. 9. SRI. K.A.AJEEM, W/O.LATE V.M.KADER SHA, 11/1179, T.B. ROAD, PALAKKAD. R1 TO R6 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI. R7 BY V. CHIDAMBARESH, SR. COUNSEL. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- R.P.No.1067 of 2007 ------------------------------- Dated this the 7th January, 2008. O R D E R I have disposed of the writ petition holding that the same is pre-mature. Subsequently, two more writ petitions were filed challenging the very same resolution. In view of the nature of order, which I propose to pass, it is only just and proper that the review petition is allowed, and the writ petition is heard and disposed of on merits along with the other connected writ petitions. In the result, the review petition is allowed, and the writ petition, W.P.(C) No.26488/2007, is restored. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE nj.