- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (Company) No. 1 OF 2008 IN COMPANY APPLICATION No. 1298 OF 2007 IN COMPANY APPLICATION No. 302 OF 2007 IN COMPANY PETITION No. 412 OF 1996 BGM Industrial Services .. Petitioner (Revision) Papco Investments Corpn. Petitioner (Original) Vs. Official Liquidator ... Respondent Mr. H. M. G. Murthy in person for the petitioner. Mr. S. Ramakanta, Dy. Official Liquidator for the respondent. CORAM : A. M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 6, 2008. PC . Heard the applicant who appears in person. According to the applicant, I have failed to examine the efficacy of the order passed on 23rd August 2007 in Company Application No. 302 of 2007 whereby the Company Judge relegated the applicant before the Official Liquidator, who in turn was expected to adjudicate the claim of the - 2 - applicant. 2. To my mind, the direction so passed in order dated 23rd August 2007 in no way extricates the applicant of his obligation to produce the original documents to support his claim, as is required by order dated 16th November 2006 passed in Company Applicaton No. 635 of 1999. In other words, the applicant would be able to establish his claim only if the primary evidence (original documents) were to be produced to establish his title in respect of the disputed property. As no good ground for excusing the production of primary evidence, has been made out, the question of entertaining other evidence (secondary evidence) in the first instance does not arise. 3. Accordingly, I find no reason to review my order dated 15th January 2008. Hence, the Review Petition is rejected. Sd/- [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.]