IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.186 of 2009 Jineshwar Singh, Son of Late Ram Prasad Singh, Resident of Village – Barap, Police Station – Garhani, District – Bhojpur. ------ Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Human Resources Department Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Vice Chancellor, Vir Kuar Singh University, Bhojpur at Ara. 3. The Secretary Genera, Vir Kuar Singh University, Bhojpur at Ara. 4. The Account Officer, Vir Kuar Singh University, Bhojpur at Ara. 5. The Director, Provident Fund Secretariat, Finance Department, Pant Bhawan, Bihar, Patna. 6. The District Provident Fund Officer, Bhojpur at Ara. --------- Respondents ---------------------------------- 2 19.12.2011 Heard Sri Madanjeet Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel No. 7, who appears on behalf of Respondent No. 1, 5 & 6 /State of Bihar and Sri Sarvadeo Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 2, 3 & 4 /Vir Kuar Singh University, Bhojpur at Ara. The petitioner, who retired long back in the year 1996 as Class IV employee from H.D. Jain College, Ara under Vir Kuar Singh University, Bhojpur at Ara has prayed for directing the Respondents to clear all his retiral dues. It was submitted on behalf of the petitioner that save and except pension no other retiral dues has been paid to the petitioner till date. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that for the relief sought for in the present writ petition the petitioner had also represented before the authority concerned. However, no decision has been taken on his representation nor his retiral dues has been cleared till date. 2 Sri Sarvadeo Singh, learned counsel for the Respondent/Vir Kuar Singh University, Bhojpur at Ara makes a prayer to adjourn the case for getting instruction and filing counter affidavit. The writ petition was filed in the year 2009 after serving copy of the writ petition on learned counsel for all the Respondents. Fact remains that the petitioner retired in the year 1996 and as stated by the petitioner he is only getting pension and no retiral dues has been paid. Accordingly, the court is of the opinion that instead of keeping the matter further pending it is desirable to dispose of the writ petition granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before Respondent No. 2 / Vice Chancellor, Vir Kuar Singh University, Bhojpur at Ara within a period of six weeks in respect of claim made in the present writ petition. If such representation is filed, the Respondent No. 2 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. If the Respondent No. 2 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for clearing all the retiral dues of the petitioner along with admissible statutory interest on delayed payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, the Respondent No. 2 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner 3 within two months from the date of filing of such representation. The writ petition with above observation and direction stands disposed of. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)