IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2011 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29009 of 2011(A) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. DANE M.GEORGE,INNATE I T SOLUTIONS, OPP S.L.PLAZA, VETTIKKATT TOWER, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI 682 025. 2. VARKEY PAUL, INNATE I T SOLUTIONS, OPP S.L.PLAZA, VETTIKKATT TOWER, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI 682 025. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ANIL. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY,REP.BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR, KOTTAYAM- 686 562. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM - 686 562. R1 & R2 BY SRI. T.A. SHAJI, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.29009/2011-A: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE IST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P1(A): TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF PAYMENT OF FEE OF THE IST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION FILED BY THE IST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2(A): TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF PAYMENT OF FEE OF THE IST PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER EXHIBIT P3(A): TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF PAYMENT OF FEE OF THE 2ND PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 29009 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the results of the examination were declared, they found that there has been less marks for all papers. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-