CR No.4925 of 2008 - 1 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.4925 of 2008 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 23.11.2009 **** Smt. Balbir Kaur . . . . Petitioner VS. Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation, Gurdaspur & another . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Ms. Jagdeep Bains, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. G.S. Attariwala, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1 Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr. Onkar Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 5 **** SURYA KANT J.(ORAL) CM No.27451-CII of 2009 This application has been moved by Hardyal Singh, Avtar Singh and Manjit Kaur for their impleadment as party respondents. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed subject to all just exceptions and they are ordered to be impleaded as party respondent Nos.3, 4 & 5 respectively. CM stands disposed of. CR No.4925 of 2008 CR No.4925 of 2008 - 2 - (1). In deference to order dated 27.10.2009, the Deputy Commissioner, Jalandhar has submitted a report, duly signed by the District Revenue Officer, Jalandhar; Tehsildar, Jalandhar-II; and Tehsildar, Gurdaspur. The same is taken on record. Prompt action taken by the Deputy Commissioner, Jalandhar is highly appreciated. (2). No sooner this Court was inclined to issue appropriate directions for auctioning of the immoveable property(ies) owned by the family members of the respondent No.2 – the judgement debtor, Hardyal Singh, the newly added respondent No.3, who is the brother of respondent No.2, volunteers and states at the bar that he is ready and willing to pay Rs.4 lacs to the petitioner and her children towards full and final settlement of the claim. He undertakes to pay a sum of Rs.3 lacs to the petitioner by way of a demand draft within one week followed by payment of the balance amount of Rs.1 lac by 31st January, 2010. The above given offer is acceptable to counsel for the petitioner. (3). In view of the above-stated undertaking given by the newly added respondent No.3 – Hardyal Singh, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction that on payment of Rs.4 lacs and on production of the Photostat copy of the receipt to be issued by the petitioner along with the Photostat copies of the demand draft(s) and after verification of the actual payment, the Revenue Authorities shall remove the charge on immoveable properties of CR No.4925 of 2008 - 3 - respondent No.2 or his family created under the orders of this Court. (4). Since the newly added respondent No.3 has agreed to make the payment in a time-bound manner, the order dated 27.10.2009 of this Court is modified/clarified to the extent that the possession of the subject immoveable properties shall continue with their respective owners, however, till the entire payment is made, the subject property/assets shall not be encumbrated nor any sale or transfer shall take place. On receipt of payment of Rs.4 lacs to the petitioner and her children, the execution shall also stand satisfied. (5). Let a copy of this order be handed over to Mr. G.S. Attariwala, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for information and necessary compliance. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 23.11.2009 vishal shonkar