IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. -M No. 24236 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.9.2011 Sunil Kumar ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Punjab ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present : Mr. Sanjeev K. Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. RAJESH BINDAL, J. While issuing notice of motion on 11.8.2011, the following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner were noticed: “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. In the FIR registered on the basis of secret information, it is mentioned that persons named in the FIR are going in a car having fake visas and air tickets. The car was intercepted and two other persons named in the FIR were arrested. The petitioner has not been named in the FIR.” Learned counsel for the State, on instructions received from HC Sukhpal Singh, submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation and he is not required for custodial interrogation. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made above, in my opinion, the petitioner is not required to be taken into custody for interrogation. Interim bail granted to the petitioner on 11.8.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. ( Rajesh Bindal ) 26.9.2011 Judge Meenu