HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 24th December, 2010 1st Bail Application No. 1115 of 2010 Order on the bail application of the accused. Rajendra Kumar S/o Babu ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand …….. Opposite Party In Case Crime No. 140 of 2010 U/S 420, 467, 468 and 471 I.P.C. Police Station Bahadrabad District Haridwar Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Shri Vivek Shukla, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri G.S. Sandhu, the learned Government Advocate for the State. The applicant made an attempt to encash two cheques but failed. Without commenting any further into the merits of the case and considering the fact that the applicant did not get the amount in his hand, the court is of the opinion that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail at this stage. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 140 of 2010, U/S 420, 467, 468 and 471 I.P.C., on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 24.12.2010 Shiv