1 58cra729-11 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 729 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.542 OF 2011 Smt. Vasanti (Sindhu) Waman Pawar .. Applicant V/s. Rajaram Bhoju Aher .. Respondent ..... Mr. P. N. Joshi for the applicant. Mjr. M. S. Karnik for the respondent. ..... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 22, 2011. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. A statement of the learned counsel appearing for the applicant is already recorded in the earlier order that the applicant is not pressing the Revision Application on merits. He seeks longer time to vacate considering the fact that the suit premises is a residential premises and the applicant is a widow. The applicant seeks time of 3 and ½ years to vacate. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent opposes the said prayers and submits that a reasonable time be granted. 2. The suit is of the year 1993. Considering the facts of the case, time to vacate deserves to be granted till 31st March, 2014. 2 58cra729-11 3. Hence, I pass the following order : :: O R D E R :: i. The Revision Application is dismissed as not pressed. ii. Notwithstanding the dismissal of the Revision Application, the decree for possession shall not be executed subject to condition of the applicant filing usual undertaking in this Court within a period of four weeks from today. iii. If the undertaking is not filed within a period of four weeks from today, the decree for possession shall forthwith become executable. iv. Civil Application No.542 of 2011 does not survive and the same is disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J.)