IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 1ST APRIL 2011 / 11TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 10555 of 2011(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RUKIA HAIDROSE , W/O.LATE,HARIDROSE MUSALIAR KAROLY HOUSE, PUTHUPALLIPRAM KARA, THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE,KANAYANNOOR TALUK. BY ADV. SMT.R.RAJASREE (CHUTTIMATTATHIL) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, TALUK OFFICE,PERUMBAVOOR. 2. TALUK SURVEYOR KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, TALUK OFFICE,PERUMBAVOOR. 3. SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT (RE-SURVEY) SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, MINI CIVIL STATION THRIPUNITHURA. 4. VILLAGE OFFICER ARACKKAPPADY VILLAGE, P.O.VENGOLA,PERUMBAVOOR. SR GP SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/04/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ....................... W.P.(C).10555/2011 ....................... Dated this the 1st day of April, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer:- issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or order or direction, commanding the respondents to mutate the property described in Ext.P1 document and also to correct the thandapper name of the vendor which is mistakenly recorded in the revenue records. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is constrained to approach this Court because of the delay on the part of the first respondent in considering the request of the petitioner to effect mutation in respect of the property covered by Ext.P1 whereby much loss and hardships are being caused; virtually preventing the petitioner from enjoying the same in an effective manner. W.P.(C).10555/11 2 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. Taking into account of the fact that Exts.P2 and P3 applications are pending consideration before the first respondent, it is directed that the first respondent shall consider Exts.P2 and P3 applications and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 4. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for taking further steps. Writ petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, Judge mrcs