1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR S.B. Crl. Revision Petition No.240/2010 (Ata-ur-rehman & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of Order : 12.03.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI Mr.S.S.Hasan, for the petitioners. Mr.Laxman Meena, PP. By the Court: By this revision petition, a challenge has been made to the order dated 01.12.2009 whereby the charges were framed against the petitioners for offence under Sections 308, 323 and 324/34 of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there exist cross cases and otherwise, the injuries received by the injured were found to be simple in nature, thus a case under Section 308 of IPC is not made out. Learned Public Prosecutor on the other hand submits that the injured had received 10 injuries out of which two injuries were on vital part i.e. on head. It is stated that a fracture was also sustained apart from the fact that one injury was caused by sharp weapon. Thus, looking to the aforesaid facts, the charges were framed and at this stage, further appreciation cannot be made. 2 I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and find that the Court below has considered the relevant facts for framing of the charges and I do not find any error in the impugned order dated 01.12.2009. Accordingly, the revision petition filed by the petitioners is dismissed. (M.N. BHANDARI),J. Preety Item NO.4