V® Q/% 0 NA . SINGLE BENCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARW AT BILASPua, SECOND APPEAL NO7260 OF 2005. APPELLANT , Videshi, S/o Bhimbha Rawatw DEFENDANT aged about 50 years, Occupationv- Agricultu,re, R/o Village-Kenwachhi, Tahsil — Bemetara, DiSQtE-Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS {PLAINTIFFS y/ 1 aged'about Nirmala Bai, 3O W/o years, Jagan" Rawat, Occupation- Agriculture‘ R/o Village-Dholiya. 2. Santoshi Bai, 8/0 Bhuiieshwar f; Rawat, aged ab‘out 27 yearsg OccupationV-Agriculture R/o Villvage- Ninwa, Both Tahsil-Bemetara, Distt- Durg (C.G.v) RES.NO.3 'State of Chhattisgarh, fDEFENDANT Through: The CoH‘ector, Durg, Distt— Durg (C.G.) MEMORANDUM OF SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTIONM/OO C.P.C. ” XI-HC-22 31mm WW mmw ‘ WW§WW mm am%naw%w 17.0&2005 None for The appeHam. Shri Vipmsen‘Agmwal, counsel for respondem's No.1 & 2. 5hri AK Pmsad, Lawy r for responden‘r No.3/51a1'e. Once The case was call d ou‘r during fhe course of fhe day, bu‘r for wan'f of prosecu'l'ion on behalf of fhé appeHon'r, i‘f was paséed over. Now, The'case has b n called ouT again, but none appears for 1’he appellant hence fhe app l is dismissed. Sdl— V.K.Shrivastava Judge 0%W)