1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4643/2009. Purushottam K. Pagrut -: versus :- Khan Bahadur Amankhan Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 16, 2010. Heard Shri S.V. Sohini, learned counsel for petitioner and Shri Anil S. Mardikar, learned Counsel for Respondent. Xerox copy of the money order receipts were shown to witness which he declined and thereafter effort was made to get those xerox copies exhibited. The Court below refused to exhibit them. Then an application has been moved seeking direction to respondent to produce their accounts, the court below has refused it after noticing that the petitioners have not produced any receipts or money orders towards lease amount of the disputed property having signature of the witness or non-applicants before it. I do not find anything wrong with the application of mind by the trial Court. The nature of dispute was known to petitioners since beginning and they could have taken necessary steps at the threshold. No case is made out 2 warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is therefore dismissed with no order as to cost. JUDGE Rgd.