IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 16074 of 2008 Between: P. Madhu S/o. Saidulu R/o. C/o. H.No.12/127, Cheruvu Bazar, Kodada, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Thasildar, O/o. Thasildar Kodada Mandal, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Suryapeta, Nalgonda District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction preferably one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the illegal action of the respondents in interfering the possession of the writ petitioner of the land extent of 372 Square Yards Bearing in Survey No.1066/4, Block No.1 situated at Village and Mandal Kodada, Nalgonda District without invoking any authority of Law is highly illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and consequently declare the action of the respondents is bad and contrary to Article 19,21 and 300(A) of Constitution of India since a right is granted under the Constitution as well as the human rights respectively. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR C.RAJA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: ORDER: The petitioner who claims to be the absolute owner and possessor of an extent of 372 square yards of land in S.No.1066/4 in Block No.1 of Kodada Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District having purchased the same under registered sale deed dated 22.3.2003 filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents not to interfere with his possession of the said land. His grievance is that he made an application before the 1st respondent on 4.7.2008 seeking to fix boundaries of his land on the ground that the persons who purchased along with him while making their boundaries, disturbed the boundaries of his land, but so far the authorities have not fixed the boundaries and are not permitting him to construct his building. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. Admittedly, the petitioner made the application on 4.7.2008 before the authorities seeking survey of his land and without even waiting for the statutory period prescribed for disposing of such application, approached this Court by way of this writ petition. Therefore, it is not proper for this Court to grant the relief sought for by the petitioner at the stage. The authorities are at liberty to consider and dispose of the application of the petitioner in accordance with law, on its own merits, and the dismissal of this writ petition shall have no bearing on the application of the petitioner. With the above observation, the writ petition is dismissed. N.V.RAMANA,J Dt.25.7.2008 msv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Thasildar, O/o. Thasildar Kodada Mandal, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Suryapeta, Nalgonda District. 3 2CCs to Govt.Pleader for Revenue, High Court of A.P. Hyd. 4 2CD copies