IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 378 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 131 OF 2007 EDC LIMITED ... Applicant Versus SWAN ENAMELS PVT. LTD., ... Respondent Mr. Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.S.Sardessai, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & R. C. CHAVAN, JJ. Date:- 8th September, 2008 P.C. This first appeal was dismissed for non compliance of certain office objections. Now, notice is served and the respondent is duly appearing. Since the unserved respondent Swan Enamels Pvt. Ltd. has been duly served and the learned Advocate appearing in this application states that he has instructions to file the wakalatnama in the First appeal, the order dismissing the appeal for non-prosectuion is re-called. The appeal is restored back to file. In the peculiar facts, there will be no order as to costs. Misc.Civil Application disposed off. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. R. C. CHAVAN, J. cg