1 ao792-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa APPEAL FOR ORDER NO. 792 OF 2010 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 987 OF 2010 Ramji Premji Vira & Ors. .. Appellants v/s. Mumbai Metropolitian Region Development Authority & Ors. .. Respondents. .... Mr. G. N. Pandit for the Appellants. Mr. A. R. Patil, A.G.P. for the State. .... CORAM : R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATE : JULY 20, 2010. P.C. This Appeal is directed against that part of the order passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court on 28th May, 2010, whereby he refused to continue the earlier status-quo while restoring the Notice of Motion and fixed it for hearing on 15th May, 2010. Now, the learned counsel for the appellants states that the Notice of Motion is fixed for hearing on 9th August, 2010. On the understanding that he will not take any adjournment on 9th August, 2010, and that the matter will be argued, till then respondent no. 2, who is represented by learned A.G.P,. will not 2 ao792-10 disturb the status-quo as on today. The Appeal is disposed of. 2. It is made clear that if any extension of status-quo is sought by the appellants, the extension will not be granted. There would be no question of extension of interim orders, unless the matter is required to be adjourned on account of lapse of defendant or on account of non availability of Court, and the matter will be heard on 9th August, 2010. 3. In view of the disposal of the Appeal, Civil Application No. 987 of 2010 does not survive, and is disposed of accordingly. [ R. C. CHAVAN, J. ]