IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.39337 OF 2008 1. CHANDESHWAR PRASAD SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM DAYAL SINGH 2. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH, SON OF CHANDESHWAR PRASAD SINGH 3. NIRANJAN KUMAR SINGH, SON OF CHANDESHWAR PRASAD SINGH 4. TINKU KUMAR SINGH, SON OF CHANDESHWAR PRASAD SINGH ALL RESIDNET OF RAJENDRA GHAT, SADAQUAT ASHRAM, POLICE STATION PATLIPUTRA, DISTRICT PATNA ………………………………………………………………………….PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. PUSHPA DEVI, WIFE OF VIJAY CHANDRA PRASAD, RESIDENT OF RAJENDRA GHAT, SADAQUAT ASHRAM, POLICE STATION PATLIPUTRA, DISTRICT PATNA ……………………………………………………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES ********* 2 25/07/2011 Heard Counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 1 is a well known man and that the complainant/Opposite Party No. 2 and his men are trying to disturb the possession of the petitioners by breaking the boundary wall. Learned Counsel further submits that he had given information to the Police regarding the said occurrence on the very day that it took place. The complaint has been filed after four days. The petitioners would be at liberty to bring the informatory petition/Sanha filed to the attention of the Court below at the stage of the framing of the charges. At this stage, the Court cannot quash the order taking cognizance as there is no illegality in the said 2 order. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)