IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.14863 of 2011 Pappu Rai Versus The State Of Bihar ------- 03/ 08.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. There is specific allegation of rape against the petitioner but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that no sign of rape has been found by the doctor in course of medical examination of the victim and no case under the provision of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is made out. It is further contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that so-called cloths of the victim were produced by the informant and, as a matter of fact, the aforesaid cloths were not seized by the police. Taking into consideration the seriousness of the offence as well as allegation levelled against the petitioner, I do not feel it proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case no. 156/2010 pending in the court of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patnacity stands rejected. However, it appears that the petitioner is in jail custody since 21.12.2010 and up till now case is pending in the court of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patnacity. The Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patnacity is, hereby, directed to commit the case of the petitioner to the court of Sessions in accordance with law within 15 2 days from the date of receipt of this order and after commitment, the trial court shall conclude the trial of the petitioner within nine months from the date of framing of the charge and if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within the above stated period, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before the learned trial court itself. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)