: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1176 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.512 OF 2006 Pallavi Chandavarkar ... Appellant V/s. Nandan Mohan Chandavarkar & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.V.B. Naik a/w Ms.A.Jhunjhunwala for Appellant Mrs.Soma Singh for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: MARCH 29, 2010 P.C.: 1. The civil application has been filed for various reliefs. The first relief is that the record be corrected to indicate that the appeal has not been disposed of on 13.10.2008 as mentioned in the office noting. The consent terms which were filed on record in the First Appeal on 10.10.2008 indicate in para 7 that the first appeal would remain pending till such time as the decree of divorce was granted by the appellate Court. Hence, the record be corrected accordingly and the present First Appeal No. 512 of 2006 be shown as pending till today. 2. It appears that the decree of divorce has been passed in terms of consent terms which are annexed to the civil application. These terms have been filed on : 2 : 24.9.2009 in this Court. Under the consent terms the applicant was permitted to withdraw certain amounts i.e. Rs.2 lakhs, which are deposited in the City Civil Court in her maiden name and Rs.6.75 crores deposited in this Court. 3. In view of the consent terms filed, the applicant is permitted to withdraw the aforesaid amount mentioned in clauses 5 and 6 of the consent terms filed on 10.10.2008 in this Court in her maiden name Pallavi Shetty, subject to the undertakings in the consent terms filed before the Family Court which were also a part of the consent terms filed in the present first appeal. 4. Civil application is disposed of in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (d). 5. First appeal is disposed of in terms of consent terms filed on 10.10.2008 in view of the consent decree passed by the Family Court. 6. In view of the above, Civil Application Nos.7619 of 2010 and 3342 of 2009 do not survive and the same stand disposed of.