C.W.P. No.4028 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.4028 of 2009 Date of Decision: 13.01.2010 Dhiraj Ahuja ....Petitioner Versus Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. and others ....Respondents Present: Mr. Sukhwinder Pal Singh, Advocate for Mr. Amit Rawal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate for Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Advocate for HSIIDC-respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.3. None for respondent No.4. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No ` -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. To a rejection of a claim by the petitioner for allotment of a plot, an intervention has been sought through an appropriate writ before this Court. The contention of learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 is that an Anomalous Committee has been set up, when there were several objections from several persons, who had grievances against non-allotment C.W.P. No.4028 of 2009 -2- of plots and they are considering the claims of all persons, who are aggrieved by the earlier decision. The petitioner shall stake his claim before the Committee which is constituted and the learned counsel for the respondent assures that a review will be taken in relation to the allotment of plots in the light of the relevant Rules and Regulations within the parameters properly drawn up now for allotment. The Committee will serve a notice to the petitioner fixing a particular date and time for appearance and they will take a decision in accordance with law. 2. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 13, 2010 Pankaj*