IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.4570 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision:29.07.2011 Smt. Heena ...Petitioner versus Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, PNB House, Bank Square, Sector 17, Chandigarh, through its Registrar, and others. ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. Sukhvinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for respondent No.1. Mr. R.S.Bhatia, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. Rohit Sapra, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) 1. The contention in response to the averments made in the writ petition is that, against the order of Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), there is a provision for an appeal under Section 20 of the DRAT. I uphold this objection and direct the petitioner to resort to the remedy before the appellate forum. The time taken by the petitioner in prosecuting the proceedings before this Court bonafide may be considered for exclusion, if such a petition is moved by the petitioner before the DRAT. 2. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court before the DRAT in the manner referred to above. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE 29.07.2011 sanjeev