IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN THURSDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2009 / 21ST JYAISHTA 1931 DBA.No. 64 of 2009() -------------------- MATTER RELATING TO COCHIN DEVASWOM BARD - RECONSTRUCTION OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF ERNAKULAM SIVA TEMPLE. PETITIONERS(S): ----------------------- SECRETARY, COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP,SC,COCHIN D.B RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- DEPUTY DIRECTOR, LOCAL FUND ACCOUNT (C.D.) AUDIT, THRISSUR. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.LAXMI NARAYANAN. THIS DEVASWOM BOARD APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - D.B.A. No. 64 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of June, 2009. JUDGMENT Raman, J, In Report No. 78 Ombudsman had suggested to reconstitute the Advisory Committee of the Ernakulam Siva Temple. Accordingly, this court directed by order dated 22.1.2009 to reconstitute the Advisory Committee consisting of 21 members. Accordingly a Committee consisting of 21 members are reconstituted. The present application is for approval of the order dated 21.3.2009. 2. Since the constitution of an Advisory Committee is as per the provisions contained in the Act, and it is to be done by nomination, there is no need to get approval as such from this court. The direction which was issued earlier was necessitated because there was a report from the Ombudsman and the Committee was continuing for a long period. Now that it is reconstituted. We do not think in the factual situation any permission or approval is required. DBA.64/2009. 2 The writ petition is closed. P.R. Raman, Judge P. Bhavadasan, Judge sb.