IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1473 OF 2001 Between: Akbar Hussain ..... Appellant/Complainant AND 1. G. Yugender 2. The Sate of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. ..... Respondents/Respondents The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: The criminal appeal by the complainant, under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against the judgment, dated 01.08.2001, in C.C.No.64 of 1996, on the file of the learned Judicial I Class Magistrate, Pargi, Ranga Reddy District, whereunder and whereby, the accused was found not guilty of the offences punishable under Sections 352 and 504 of IPC. 2. The criminal appeal was admitted on 10.10.2001. The notice sent to the first respondent/accused was returned unserved. Therefore, this Court by an order, dated 20.04.2009, directed the learned counsel appearing for the appellant to furnish the correct address of the first respondent/accused within a period of four weeks from that date so that the office can send notice to her, failing which, the criminal appeal shall stand dismissed. The said conditional order has not been complied with, by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. Accordingly, the docket proceeding, dated 20.04.2009, is given effect. In the absence of the first respondent/accused, the criminal appeal cannot be determined and decided. 3. Hence, the criminal appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. _______________ (K.C. BHANU, J) Date: 15th September, 2009 KL