IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 30TH JANUARY 2009 / 10TH MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 37288 of 2008(L) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- SHAN.M., S/O.MAHEEN, TC.28/288, NGO QUARTERS KARAMANA PO., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN SRI.T.K.ANANDA PADMANABHAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR UNIVERSITY BUILDING, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. VICE CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. PRINCIPAL. S.N.COLLEGE, CHEMPAZHANTHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. PRINCIPAL, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, KERALA UTY. FOR R1-2 SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU, SC FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 37288 OF 2008 (L) ==================== Dated this the 30th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner was a student of the 3rd respondent College in B.A.History. He was dismissed from the college and finally the University passed Ext.P6 order permitting him to get a college transfer to another college or continue his studies through private registration. 2. Petitioner sought admission in the 4th respondent College. There was no response and therefore this writ petition is filed seeking a direction that he be either allowed to continue under the 3rd respondent or be admitted in the 4th respondent. 3. Admittedly, he was dismissed from the 3rd respondent College and according to the standing counsel for the 3rd respondent, TC was also issued. That has not been interfered with in Ext.P6. If that be so, there is no justification for the demand that he should be allowed to continue in the same college. 4. In so far as the 4th respondent University College is concerned, standing counsel informs that there was no seat available. In such a situation, it cannot be ordered that he should be accommodated in that college either. WPC 37288/08 :2 : 5. If that be so, the only option available to the petitioner may be to continue on private registration. However, the standing counsel for the University submits that if the petitioner is able to identify a seat anywhere in any other college, University is willing to consider his case for accommodation against that vacancy in the next academic year. Therefore, leaving it open to find out the availability of any vacancy, in which case, the petitioner can approach the University for accommodation, the writ petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp