IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2748 of 1997 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2095 OF 1997 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2093 OF 1997 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1307 OF 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? Nos. 1 to 5 No. -------------------------------------------------------------- MANSUKH DALA Versus A'BAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR VB GHARANIYA for Petitioners MR HS MUNSHAW for Respondents. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.R.CALLA Date of decision: 09/05/97 COMMON ORAL JUDGEMENT Both the sides submitted that all these four Special Civil Applications may be decided in terms of the order dated 21.1.1997 passed as a common order in Special Civil Application No.10479 of 1996 with Special Civil Applications No. 10817/96 to to 10827/96, 10680/96, 10682/96, 177/97 to 196/97, 10747/96, 119/97 to 121/97 and 13/97. Learned Advocate Mr.Garania appearing for the petitioner in these matters was relied upon the orders passed in Special Civil Applications No.9311, 10310, 10312, 10314, 10315 and 10317 of 1995 (Coram : C.K.Thakkar,J), Special Civil Application No. 941 of 1996 (Coram : H.L.Gokhale,J) and in Special Civil Application No. 10363 of 1995 (Coram : Miss.R.M.Doshit,J). Learned Advocate appearing for the respondents Mr.H.S.Munshaw has made a statement in the following terms : [1] That as and when the petitioners complete actual 900 days of working in five years or more, they will become eligible for regularisation as per the policy of the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation in pursuance of the award recorded in Reference (IT) No.179/95 on 30.6.78 and the resultant circular dated 2.6.82. [2] Accordingly, the case of those who have completed the aforesaid period are in process in order of seniority. [3] Meanwhile, the petitioners will be engaged as daily-rated casual workers as and when the work is available. [4] Such work will be given to the petitioners in order of their standing in the list of casual daily rated workers and it will be subject to judicial orders or decisions if any in this behalf. In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned Advocate appearing for the respondents Mr.Munshaw, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners Mr.V.B.Garania has not invited further consideration and decision in these matters. Consequently, all these four Special Civil Applications stands disposed of. Rule is discharged in Special Civil Application No. 2748 of 1997, notices are discharged in Special Civil Applications No. 2093 and 2095 of 1997 and Special Civil Application No. 1307 of 1997 is also decided accordingly. No order as to costs. ----