IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32399 of 2009 1. Jai Jairam Roy, Son of Late Bishundeo Roy. 2. Mrityunjay Kumar @ Mintu Roy, Son of sri Jai Jairam Roy. Both residents of village-Mehan, P.S.-Balia in the district of Begusarai. …………Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …………Opp. Party. ----------- 2/ 06.11.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are alleged to have committed offence under sections 323, 341, 384, 385 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections ¾ of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. As per the allegations, the labour charge for cultivation was not paid to the informant by petitioner No.1, mamely Jai Jairam Roy and when informant asked for his labour charges he was called by his caste name, his cultivation was damaged which caused loss to him. Counsel for the petitioners submits that allegation do not make out any offence under Section 3(x) of the SC/ST Act and also that the false case has been instituted due to land dispute. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioners is allowed. They are directed to be released on bail on their surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today and on furnishing bail bonds of Rs., 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief 2 Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with S.C./S.T. P.S. Case No. 153 of 2008 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)