BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eighteenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14993 of 2011 RAJA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED-1 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE JEYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT IN CRIME NO. 183 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.K.MANICKAM Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/accused prays for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 420, 120(B), 171(D), 467, 468, 469 of IPC, in Crime No.183 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Additional Public Prosecutor(Criminal Side) appearing for the State. 3.Considering the arguments advanced by both sides, this Court could understand that the petitioner is arrayed as accused No.1 and the offence said to have been committed by him is under Sections 420, 120(B), 171(D), 467, 468, 469 of IPC. 4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his arguments that the petitioner is working as Lecturer in Ramana Polytechnic College, Dindigul and he was acused of not performing his duty by impersonating some other person while conducting the practical examination. He would further submit in his argument that he is not guilty and he is working in the said Polytechnic and he is ready to co-operate with the investigation. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal Side) would submit in his arguments that the investigation is offing and if for any reason, anticipatory bail is granted, suitable conditions may be imposed for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that the petitioner is accused of impersonating some other person and he was accused of guilty. But however investigation on the complaint is still pending and he is continuing in his service. Therefore, there is no absconding, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or on his surrendering before the Judicial Magistrate concerned on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Periyakulam and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 8.00 p.m. Until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. The petitioner shall surrender before the Court concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 18/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PERIYAKULAM 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THENI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE JEYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. A.K.MANICKAM Advocate SR.No.40433 rl/6c – 21.11.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14993 of 2011 Date :18/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/