THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.18511 and 26701 of 2008 COMMON ORDER: When these writ petitions are taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the ﬁrst respondent that subject matter of these Writ Petitions is covered to be allowed in view of order passed by this Court in the case of ADARSHA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, GIDDALUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT v. ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY[1]. In view of the said submission, following the aforesaid order of this Court and in view of the reasons recorded therein, these Writ Petitions are allowed by setting aside the impugned demand notices issued to the petitioners, on the ground that they are not based on any statute, ordinance or regulation made under the Andhra Pradesh Universities Act, 1991 and that it shall be open to the University to inquire as to whether the petitioners have collected any amount from the students towards development fee/infrastructure fee, and if it emerges that the fee has been collected, the petitioners shall be under obligation to refund the same to the students or pay it to the University, and if any statement made by the petitioners in this regard is found to be incorrect, that would by itself be a ground to deny the renewal of affiliation. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 24th NOVEMBER, 2011. kvni [1] 2010(3) ALT 670