CWP No.18986 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: 15.10.2010 Jaipal Singh & Others ...Petitioners VERSUS Haryana Urban Development and another …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.Rajbir Sehrawat, Advocate for the petitioners Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.Ajay Nara, Advocate has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the controversy involved and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of at motion stage itself. The petitioners are practising lawyers and are members of the District Bar Association Jhajjar. Bahadurgarh is a Tehsil and Sub Division of the District Jhajjar The respondents formulated a policy whereby plots have been reserved for advocates in various Urban Estates developed by HUDA in the State of Haryana. The petitioners made applications for consideration for allotment of plot in accordance with the policy. The grievance of the petitioners is that their applications are not being CWP No.18986 of 2010 2 considered. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if respondents are directed to consider the application of the petitioners. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to decide the applications of the petitioners for allotment of the plot alongwith other eligible candidates, subject to the condition that the same have been filed within the prescribed period and the petitioners fulfil all the requisite qualifications and eligibility, in accordance with the policy, within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is received by the competent authority. Needless to say in the event the claim of the petitioners is rejected, it shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 15.10. 2010 MFK CWP No.10585 of 2010 3