LPA/110620/2007 1/3 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No. 1106 of 2007 In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 12310 of 2007 With CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8564 of 2007 In LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No. 1106 of 2007 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SHARAD D.DAVE ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= DHANJIBHAI HIRJIBHAI NASIT - Appellant(s) Versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT & 8 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR BM MANGUKIYA for Appellant(s) : 1, DS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for Respondent(s) : 1 - 5,7 - 9. MR BD KARIA for Respondent(s) : 6, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SHARAD D.DAVE Date : 20/08/2008 LPA/110620/2007 2/3 JUDGMENT ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT) This Appeal preferred under clause 15 of the Letters Patent arises from the order dated 8th May, 2007 made by the learned Single Judge pending the above Special Civil Application No.12310/2007. The appellant has taken out the above Special Civil Application for a relief against the respondents nos.7, 8 and 9 to restrain them from participating in the meeting of the Board of Directors of the respondent no.6 – Una Taluka Khand Vechan Sangh Limited, a cooperative society, scheduled on 10th May, 2007. By order dated 8th May, 2007, the learned Single Judge has referred the matter to the Larger Bench and has refused to grant interim relief. Therefore, the present Appeal. In view of passage of time, the Appeal has become infructuous. The Appeal and the Civil Application are accordingly disposed of. (Sharad D.Dave, J.) (Ms.R.M.Doshit, J.) LPA/110620/2007 3/3 JUDGMENT /moin