THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU APPEAL SUIT No. 103 of 2006 JUDGMENT: When the matter had come up on 01.02.2011, none appeared for the appellant and no representation on his behalf. So, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on 04.02.2011. Thereafter also, it underwent one adjournment. Today also, when the matter has come up before lunch, none appeared for the appellant and there was no representation on his behalf, and so the matter was passed over. After lunch also, none appeared for the appellant and there is no representation on his behalf. This shows that the appellant is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the appeal. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 14.2.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU APPEAL SUIT No. 103 of 2006 14.2.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU APPEAL SUIT No. 103 of 2006 14.2.2011 Between: Katrapally Nagaraju …Appellant And Katrapally Srinivas …Respondent