IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3160 OF 2007 Sunderben Lalji Vira. ..Applicant. Vs. M/s. Oswal Haresh Transport Co. and ors...Respondents. Mrs.D.S.Shah i/by Mayur Narendra & Co. for the Applicant. Mr. P.K.Shrivastav i/by M.J. Pabari for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mrs. R.M. Gadhavi,APP. for the State. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 12th August, 2008 PC : 1. Heard both sides. 2. This is an application for leave to file appeal. On perusal of the impugned judgment and order,I find that the acquittal is based on cogent and acceptable reasons. According to the complainant, the notice of demand was issued by her Advocate on 10.11.2005. However, the accused produced in court an earlier demand made by the complainant herself on 21.10.2005 as well as reminder on 24.10.2005. On facts, the trial court has held that this amounts to earlier demand and if this is considered as earlier demand then complaint would be barred by limitation. In view of this finding, not a fit case to interfere in the impugned and order. Hence, leave refused. Application is disposed off. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)