CRM NO. M-9555 OF 2011 (o & m) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM NO. M-9555 OF 2011 (o & m) DECIDED ON : 11.05.2011 Wazir Singh ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. M. P. S. Mann, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate, for the complainant. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) As per allegations of the prosecution, the petitioner has taken Rs.10,70,000/- on 09.12.2009 with the false promise of getting his son recruited as Sub Inspector in the police department. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission to seek instructions whether the petitioner is ready to compensate the complainant ? Today, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that petitioner is not in a position to compensate the complainant. The allegations against the petitioner are grevious in nature. The amount is yet to be recovered. CRM NO. M-9555 OF 2011 (o & m) -2- So, in these circumstances, no ground for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Dismissed. MAY 11, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE