BEFORE THE HON’BLE fliGH CQURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR IN THE MATTER OF 3N.RAM AGEE53YRS SfO‘Slm EKADASI R/Q SAKE’I’ COLONY JAGI.)A1.PUR msTuBASTARiv. {a} VERSUS l. S’I‘ATE OF CHHATI$GARH THROUGH THE SECREEZAR‘KZ l. / wmPETITIQNER DEPARTMENT QFAEEM1A'IL ANUSUCHTIAH§ PICHHA‘DA WRG,AVAMELPSWYAIQ mYAN WBHAG,£1K.$.BHAWM\L / 2. (EQMNQSSIQNER ADIVASH VIKAS¥£ BEHU‘QD P.M. T. H3$TELRAKIjURiCi (3.} 3. ASSTT. mIXMSSKXNIER .mm5: mag, MGDAmJRgQG} ‘WRIT PE’I‘iTIDi‘I UNDER ARTICLE 226f273é1?‘ THE CON$TITUTK 1 y , GERmD RAI?UR[C.G.} / MRESPONDENTS .r fr. OF INDEA FDR ISSUANCE OF WRIT EN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND ANY OTHER ORDER OR. DIRECTXON AS DEEMED FIT .. ... [L9 @ / cHWV WP, N0. 4&2gm / I X ‘ w 2 ON X qhn P1 d€€p Samana ceunsd for 1:116 patn‘gon Shn Seaway K Agaxwa. De} he Respondents, _ By this petitioh under Attic India the petitioner has challenged e37 which file petitioeer hae been ’uty Advocate Genaral 011‘ Behalf of 1e 226f'22'? 9f the VonStituiion of me Impugned Older Amlexure P} leheved from the post of Assmtan ?§c Jagdalpm if Commiesioaer mentioned m the; petitioe th. dministrative Tribuiial vide ordei 14/2002 stayed the éeect and ' ‘ ambugh the MP. etate Adminisu V gay order i$ stillm existence. E It has beeli the Madhya Pradesh State dt 3O 5 2002 paseed in OVA No ’ opeiation of ihe tmasfer 01de i [five Tnbunal 15 abolished but that I ven than the petitionei has, been. mung Vide Older dt 97 5 200 ‘eiieifed from the preseut place ofq ‘ / Shxi Agaiwal éubmits that 3 a fact that the petitioner ha e l s oxdei of Administrative TnLuna ' § for ihe parues apd havma 1ega1d caSe 1t 1s surprismg that how the r V post m spite of the clear cut stay Oidei petitioner by the M P State 1e nonnal policy of the Govt an Isferred fot thzee yea‘e unieqs and mstrahve eXigency so demands In by the respondents ae to Why the and again and presehtly w hen his /—/_/ ' i p Een i‘eiieveci from the posi While ‘18 opeiative havmc heard learned calm to the facts and Circumstaiices of pethonei has been 1eheved fiom t against tranefei of the Admmistiative Tiihuual As pei t employee is not expected to be tiai anti in the pubhc interest or adim this case nothing has heenrshown petitioner is being transferred again e x i . I t 1 Q a i . i or. _:f—J’M m ; t 1 t e 7 ‘ A i i 5 1 ib s 1 m6 MP. State Administrafive Tribunal 15f6r 0mm was Stay€d by 'how the patmoner has b6eu ghevanm agamst that 01d€x t1 fm vacamlg of the stay 01d€1 i L€a111€d counsd f01 thf: jémled on 1‘“ Septmnba‘ 2001 . in the normal circumstances $1“ August 2004. x: \ Having yegard to this f5 Quashsd ajld it is dilfcted thai that post till ho completes 3 y: bf woyk or public interest m iraiisfei‘red; then the responde :Comt for modification 9f fha 0 With the abovs obsew fmally. 161isved. If the rsgpondents had any "ey could have approached the Tribunal i p€bltion€r submits that ths petitiGner at the present place of posting therefore he pethionar could havs continumi till ct fills relisving order Annexure Pf 1 is ths pstitioner be allowed to continus on als teLure on this post lf any oxigénoy arrants that tho potmonei should b6 ~ fits would ba at liberty to appioach ti i d€1 mons the petition stands alsposad o l J ~ a l The/parties axe entitled lor cestified : cop of thisorder. ‘ v i I l S - L.c.BHAD00 Judge maw hs f y