•f ."7 ' Js ^ffO^ .z. BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGXRH AT BILASPUR y PETITIONER L^'y ^•"" ^ ^Sy" . /•••^$?:-' ^^y .^•:^ »«• ^**' &»&•' ^^ \> J>»u'- «-';T e&/' <-?v' <^> '0 (A-* "/^UG/ ^-g?;RESPONDENTS '>^T^'- ^K^ 3. PETITION UNDER ARTIC_LE 226/_22 INDIA W.P.NQ. 2-L32-/_2003. Krishnachand Mehar, son of Shri J.R. Mehar, aged about 49 years, II Officer, Branch Manager, Sarangarh, (General Secretaiy) (Mahasachiv), Raigarh Regional Rural Bank Officers Organization (Registration No. 5383 Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, resident of Mahipara, Boirdadar, Raigarh, Tah and Distt. Raigarh (CG). VERSUS The Chairman, Regional Rural Bank, Near Gandhi Statue, Raigarh, C.G. The General Manager, Regional Rural Bank, Near Gandhi Statue, Raigarh, C.G. The Speciai Officer, Regional Rural Bank, (Prabhag) Regional Rural Bank, Head Office, Bhopal, Madfiya Pradesh. THE CONSTITUTION OF XI-HC-22 'S^I •-tiWWi, ISTily'IS, ftfWI+iy W./9.A/o. ff.\3^/3.ftV3 OrtRIT **(Rl isr^i' sn^i'qii K-ii* 3D§?T ?D+I ^riin an^i ^grer'afsa ^~.\ Hoa'ble Slu-i L.C. Bhadoo ShriA.N. Bhakta, coun|; Shri Viaay Harit, Sr. C| of India on advance CODV. I.A.Nos.6469/2003 acji aUowed. Heard. Leanied counsel for thl framed Tisiisfer PoUcv and uj reveals that the transfers of everv' tivo vears of u-iten'als. to be luade in even- two ve| practice has not been follow^ petitioner has luade a r( respondents nc, 1 aud 3, th4 subiaits that for the presj opporturiin- of fuirs.g fhe detajled auUiority/respoiideats no. 1 own luerits in accordaace witb Haviag considered fhe| Diaterial available on record fhe laerits ofthe case, m the '*|i|iri''il-i HIICll ^'fe'^t <fat$l< ^'siPg'isn^i ^el for the petitioner. tntral Govt. Staiicliag Counsel for Unloa 1479/2004 for urgent hearing are petitioner subinits fhat the Baiik has ider fhat policv (Aanexure P/4) Article 6 rtlie eiaplovees wffl be revised each .aiid It is contended tliat die evaliiatioii has ars in tlie inonth of Januaiy, but that d. He ftirfher subruits tliat tbough tlie ;presentation (Annexure P/1) before V have not decided the saiae so far. He ;nt fhe petitioner nay be given aii represeatatioa Defore the corapetent aad 3, which shall be consiclered on its law. facts aad circuinstaiices of the case, aiid wifhout expressiag any opuiion oa spiaion of this Court, ends ofjustice wiU XI-HC-22 an^r^l f«°bSfI^I ai*iich <-l%^ B:s?:Sfc;;gS88s; !s"as3>, T°? 'tinw<i, W^KW, wwvy. . l^:/':.^0:..2--^2-/^^^ WWIT gi*iiqi 3)1^1 TRB^ •gitg -S-i be seived if a direction is representation raisiag his authority/respondents 110. 1 aiid fhis order, witliiii a represeatation beiiig filed, 1 aiid 3 shaU decicle th.e sad law as earlv as.oossible prej of receipt of the representati<| still subsists, the petitioner ^ law. g3!ven With the aforesaid ob^ of. ConseQ'uentlv, M.W.P.Nj Certified copv as per n^ies. \ cbl^d-4)'1 •4i'4^T Tf f^^ ^^!< ^sdigqan^r g|ven to the petitioner to laake a detcdled i^ grievances before the coiapetent iaii.d 3 along with a copy offhe petition period of one nionfli, aad on such t^ie coinpetent authority/respondents ao. aifae on its own merits in accordaiice TFith lerablv withiii two laontiis S-om. fhe date jin. It is Dia.de clear fhs.t if aay grievan.ee jnav avail the reinedv available under the .ervations, this petitioii stands disposed 3. 1923/2003 also stands disposed of. e Sd/- •C.Bhadoo [^^^3^