IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36687 of 2010 SAURAV KUMAR @ VIKAS KUMAR @ VIKAS @ NATU KUMAR @ NATU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 09.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Admittedly, the name of petitioner came in this case in course of investigation on the basis that one Jitendra Kumar had disclosed before the Police that one Sanjay Kumar Rajak had talked on his mobile and thereafter when Police interrogated the aforesaid Sanjay Kumar Rajak, the said Sanjay Kumar Rajak disclosed this fact that he had purchased the aforesaid mobile set from the petitioner. Admittedly, the aforesaid mobile had been registered in the name of above stated Jitendra Kumar which is evident from perusal of para 67 of the case diary. Apart from the aforesaid material, there is nothing against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, petitioner, namely, Saurav Kumar @ Vikas Kumar @ Vikas @ Natu Kumar @ Natu, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M, Danapur, Patna in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 73 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)