BENi ^^r-^)Z__ IN THE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) N0. (2^ llQQg^ WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER •I .^s^ v^'^l^ < ^..-•^,y)^.^ ^f SJB0NDENTS ^ 1. .1^p"^-ofo .^:^> G^*'^ <0 r-Jagatpal Nikunj, aged about 37 years, son of Late Dukhiya Ram, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Girls Primary School Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh, through- Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONER HI6H COURT OF CHHATraSSARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S) No. 123 of 2007 Petitioner : Ja9a-tpal Nikunj Versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh <& cnother W. P.(S) . 124 of 2007 Petitioner ; Venudhar Ijardar Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh & another W. P.(S)No. 125of2(X)7 Petitioner Ku. Jeevon AAflnju Xalxo (after marriage 5mt. Jeevon Manju Viswas) Versus Req)ondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh A others W. P.(S) No. 132 of 2007 Petitioner : Clament Kertetta Versus Respondents : State of Chho^isgarh &another W. P.(S) No. 138 of 2007 Petitioner ; Dilip Singh Sidar Versus Respondents ; State of Chhatt'isgarh &onother W. P.(S) No. 143 of 2007 Petitioner : Trilochan Nayak Versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh & another W. P.(S) No. 144 of 2007 Petitioner ; Kaila^ipati Noyak Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh d another W. P.(S) No. 146 of 2007 Petitionep : Roop Narayan Ram Versus Req>ondents ; State of Chhatl-isgarh <& another ^T\ W. P.IS) No. 148 of 2007 Petitioner ; Rajkumar Patel Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh <& cnother W. P.(S) No. 152 of 2007 Petitioner : Siyam Mohan Nayak Versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgwh &another And W. P.fS) No. 160 of 2007 Petitioner : Narendra Singh Nayak Versus Respondents : State of Chhatti^arh <& ano-ther 5B: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present; Shri A.N. Bhakta, Advocate for the petitioners (s). AArs. Anju Ahuju, Deputy Sovernment Advocate, Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer, Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on this 17th Duy of Januory, 2007) The following order of the Court is passed by Sa'Ksh K. Agnihatri. J. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as u»ell as for the State/respondents jointly submit -t+iat the facts of the present writ petitions are simiiar to that of in W. P. (5) No. 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharma & another vs. State of Chhartisgarh A others), which uns disposed of vide order dated 9.10.2006. They further submit that •the question of law involved is also the same. 2. In view of the above-stated aibmissions made by tearned counsel for the parties these writ petitions are di^»osedof in terms of the order dated 9.102006 passed by this Court in W. P. (5) No. 5473/2006 (Rakedi Kumur 5barma danother vs. State of Chhattisgorh & o'thers). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record in connected matters. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge '<'.