IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 7663 of 2010() ------------------------------------------- (CRIME NO.1306/2010 OF UDAYAMPEROOR POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT) ..... ACCUSED/PETITIONER: -------------------------------------- MADAVAN @ RAJESH,AGED 35 YEARS, KALATHINGAL THARA,AMBELIPADAM,VYTTILA, JANATHA, ERNAKULAM(DIST). (NOW RESIDING AT RAKHI MANDIRAM,THIRUNALLOOR, PALLIPPURAM,CHERTHALA,ALAPPUZHA(DIST). BY ADV. SRI.P.A.MUJEEB RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.S. HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. ........................................... Bail Application No.7663 of 2010 ............................................................. Dated this the 30th day of November, 2010. ORDER Petitioner, who is the sole accused in Crime No.1306/2010 of Udayamperoor Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 308 IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 22.09.2010. The petitioner was arrested on 06.11.2010. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the Bail Application contending inter alia that the injured in this case is none other than the wife of the petitioner and that she had suffered 8 stab injuries on her chest and that the petitioner is involved in nine other crimes. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offence, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioner, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE). ln