IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (6.6.) w.P. (s) No. M‘C‘i é /2011 PETITIONER V Kanhaiyalal Vadav, Aged abouT 56 years, S/o Shri Bhokomm, Upper Division Teacher, Governmenf Middle I. M awm School Korrapali Block Malkhor‘od, DisfT. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. STo’re of Chha’rfisgar’h \ Through Secrefor‘y, School Educm‘ion Deparfmen’r D.K.5. Bhowan, Raipur (C.G.) /,2. Disfricf Educo’rion Officer Disfricf Jonjgir-Champo (6.6.) 3. JoinT Direc‘ror, Treasury, Accounf & Pension Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) v...... » 4. Block Education Officer, Block m/ Malkharod, Dish‘. Janjgir-Champa ‘ (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA @ HIGH COURT OF‘ CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDRA MORAN SHRIVASTAVA W.P.[S) N0. 4546(2011 PETITIONER Kan haiyalal Yadav Versus RESPONDENTS State of (LG. 85 Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(Q' 7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Aggearanc : Shli K.K.Pandey, coimsel for the petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghaj, P.L. for the Stats] mspondents. ORAL ORDER (1 1.08.201 n The petitioner was initially appointed as Teacher on a fixed pay of Rs. 100. After completion of probation period, he Was granted regular pay scale of Rs. 169—300. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the issued involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale With effect from the date of initial appointment or after completion of The issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh smte Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. NO. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 Others 11. State af MIP. & Others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are enfitled to xegular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon’ble Supreme Couzt. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the ed‘eot that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale him the date of initial appointment. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that this Court, While considering the same issue in Amar Sui Ram & Others Vs. State of Chnatasgarh & Others, W.P.(S) No. 4725/2006, by order probation petiod. verification months from of the the facts. date of receipt of the representation, subject to In View of the foregoing, this petition is disposcd of No order as . ‘ to costs. "* Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge