THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 16198 of 2009 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of respondent No.3 for not registering the schedule property in favour of the petitioner as per the guidelines in Memo No. 8997/JA.2/2008 dated 27.11.2008 as arbitrary and illegal. According to the petitioner, in the year 1967 the land in an extent of Ac.4-72 cents in Sy.No.222/2 of Daminedu village of Tirupati Rural Mandal, was allotted in favour of one A.K. Subrahmanyam vide proceedings No.DKT/172/4/7377. In the year 1981, the said Subrahmanyam sold the property to one Leelavathamma w/o Satyanarayana Chetty of Tirupati, vide document No.891. Further, in the year 1983, the said Leelavathamma sold the said property to one B. Kannappa Mudiliar of Tirupati vide document No.1980 dated 2.4.1983. The petitioner is intending to purchase this property from Smt. B. Rajamma w/o B. Kannappa Mudiliar, who became successor of the schedule property because of the death of her husband, and accordingly entered into an agreement of sale on 2nd February, 2008 and paid sale consideration of Rs.45.00 lakhs and taken time for registration because of the ban on registration imposed by the Lok-Ayukta in view of the allegation that the property belongs to Government and the same was encroached upon by the public. Thereafter, a report was submitted and the Lok- Ayukta has also held that the schedule property belongs to private individuals. In view of the same, the petitioner has approached the concerned authorities to accept the documents for registration, but the authorities not accepting the same with some pretext or the other. Hence, this writ petition. Be that as it may, learned counsel for the petitioner has brought to the notice of this Court that the authorities have conducted resurvey and, in view of the resurvey conducted by the authorities, Sy.Nos. 212/1 to 19 were all merged in Sy.No.212. According to the petitioner, the land purchased by him was located in Sy.No.212/13 in an extent of Ac.4-72 cents and in view of the report and merger of all the sub-divisions into one survey number i.e. Sy.No.212, he has submitted a rectification deed for registration. Under those circumstances, respondent No.1 is directed to register the document after getting the report from the Tahsildar as to merger of sub-division No.212/13 into Sy.No.212 and pass appropriate orders, as per law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU. Date: 01-12-2009. MVB.