IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH APRIL 2008 / 21ST CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 12684 of 2008(I) -------------------------- OS.158/1997 of SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA .................... PETITIONER: ------------ RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, AGED 85 YEARS KALAKKATTU HOUSE, NADAKKAVU MURI PERINGALA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.R.SANTHOSH BABU RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER OFFICIAL RECEIVER'S OFFICE, DISTRICT COURT MAVELIKARA. 2. SARITHA, AGED 20 YEARS, D/O.KASTURBA KAINIKKARA VEETTIL, KARICHAL MURI VEEYAPURAM VILLAGE (FROM AMBACKATTU VEETTIL KARICHAL MURI, VEEYAPURAM VILLAGE KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK) 3. KAVITHA OF DO. 4. KOCHUKUNJU, ADICHERRIL VEETTIL VEEYAPURAM MURI, VEEYAPURAM VILLAGE. 5. ABDUL GAFFOOR, KOCHU VEETTIL, OF DO. 6. SUBAIDA BEEVI,W/O.ABDUL GAFFOOR OF DO. 7. SAJIV, ADICHERIL VADAKKETHIL VEEYAPURAM MURI, DO VILLALGE. 8. A.G. SANKARA PILLAI, SREEVILASOM KARICHAL MURI, VEEYAPURAM VILLAGE. 9. A.G. SREEDHARAN PILLAY, REMANALAYATHIL PILAPUZHA MURI, HARIPAD VILLAGE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 12684 OF 2008 --------------------- Dated this the 10th day of April, 2008 JUDGMENT This writ petition is preferred against the order of the Subordinate judge, Mavelikara, in IA 660/08 in OS 158/97, whereby the court has granted permission to the Official Receiver to conduct the poojas and festivals in the temple as usual. 2. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits before me that the receiver has been directed by the court to handover possession of the properties from whom he had taken possession of it. In an earlier petition also, I had an opportunity to deal with the same and it was submitted that the order has not come into effect. Now the court, which has passed the order, itself has authorised the receiver to proceed with the poojas and festival in the temple and it is a fact that the order has not come into effect. If it is so, it may not be proper on my part to interfere with the order of the court below. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE vps