IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2008 / 3RD SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 29947 of 2005(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- N.CHANDRAVATHI, D/O.RADHABAI, RESIDING AT KEREMULE HOUSE, P.O.MYLATTY (VIA) UDUMA, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.K.SHRIHARI RAO SRI.P.N.ANOOP RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (GENERAL), AND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KASARAGOD. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, TRANSMISSION DIVISION, KANHIRODE, KANNUR. 3. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE J.MATHEIKEL, SC, KSEB FOR R2,3 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. NOBLE MATHEW. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: vkm W.P.(C)No. 29947/05 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 6.12.96 FROM THE 1ST RESPONDENT'S OFFICE EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 23.11.96 FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.1.97 IN O.P.No. 626/97 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXHIBIT P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. D.Dis. 481/96/D1 DATED 9.4.1997 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.10.04 IN O.P.NBO. 9688/97 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. EXHIBIT P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE ARGUMETN NOTES SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P7 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23.7.05 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. vkm KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.29947 of 2005 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 25th July, 2008. J U D G M E N T In the matter of shifting of 110 KV electric line, the grievance essentially appears to be that of compensation. There will be a direction to the second respondent to take steps to pay the eligible compensation to the petitioner, if not already paid, within three months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. If still dissatisfied, it will be open to the petitioner to work out the remedy before the District Judge. The writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.29947 of 2005 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 25th July, 2008.