FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.947 OF 2005 IN EXA. NO.320 OF 2003 IN SPECIAL SUIT NO.86 OF 1999 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. L.V. Jain for the plaintiff. Mr. Raymond with Mr. Hira Gummata for the defendant No.2. Mr.L.B.S.Puri, Representative of the Official Liquidator present. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATED : 07.11.2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. 2. This chamber summons has been taken out by the original plaintiff who is the decree holder for reliefs only against one of the Judgment debtors i.e. defendant No.2. It is not disputed before me that pending this chamber summons, by affidavit dated 7.10.2005 affirmed by defendant No.2, the assets of defendant no.2 have been disclosed. According to defendant No.2 his assets are only those which are :2: mentioned in Paragraph-13 of the affidavit. As far as prayers (a) and (b) are concerned, the same cannot be granted as the affidavit are filed. Chamber summons is therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (c) and stands disposed off. Needless to say that if the plaintiff discovers any concealed assets he will be at liberty to take out the chamber summons for further reliefs. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)