CMPM No.418/2009 in C. Rev No.20/2009 18.05.2009 Present: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the petitioner. CMPM No.418/2009 Allowed. Delay in filing the Review Petition is condoned. C. Rev No.20/2009 Heard and gone through the record. Review of our order dated 12th December, 2008, in CWP No.372 of 2007, has been sought, on the ground that this Court, while disposing of the writ petition, wrongly assumed that the post against which the name of respondent Bakshi Ram had been sponsored was reserved for Ex-serviceman, belonging to Scheduled Caste category, and, therefore, benefit of relaxation in age meant both for Ex- serviceman and Scheduled Caste has been ordered to be given to him. His contention is that, as a matter of fact, the post was reserved for Ex- serviceman of General category and not Scheduled Caste category and, therefore, the benefit in the matter of relaxation of age should not have been given, on account of his being a Scheduled Caste candidate, as the post was not meant for the candidate belonging to Scheduled Caste category. Even if it be assumed that the post was not reserved for a ….2…CMPM No.418/2009 in C. Rev No.20/2009 Scheduled Caste Ex-serviceman, still the benefit of relaxation of age, meant for Scheduled Caste candidates is required to be given to him, because the benefit of age relaxation is available to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Backward Classes, etc., candidates, even when they apply for appointment against unreserved posts. For the foregoing reasons, we see no merit in the present review petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed. CMP No.328/2009 Infructuous. ( R.B. Misra ), J. May 18, 2009(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J.