IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.759 of 2008 1. RAM CHANDRA PRASAD 2. Ram Birksh Prasad ….Petitioners Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Sachidanand Singh ….Opposite parties ----------- 2. 17.12.2008. This revision application has been preferred against the order dated 28.5.2008 passed by Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Hilsa thereby the petition filed under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. by the petitioners has been rejected. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the impugned order. On perusal of the impugned order it appears that there was sufficient material in the case diary for framing of the charge. So far the plea of alibi is concerned, it can only be considered at the stage of trial not at the stage of framing of the charge. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order. Accordingly, this revision application is rejected. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)