spb/- 1 mca48-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION MISCELLINEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 48 OF 2010 Mrs. Shubhangi Ashok Thorat ... Petitioner/Applicant. Vs. Shri Ashok Ramchandra Thorat ... Respondent. --- Mr. Ravindra V. Sankpal for the Petitioner/Applicant. Mr. S.R. Ganbavale i/by R.P. Walvekar for the Respondent. ----- CORAM : D. G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 02nd DECEMBER, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 The petitioner is the wife and respondent is the husband. The respondent has filed petition (H.M.P.No.156/2009) in the court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Karad for dissolution of marriage. The petitioner by this petition is praying for transfer of the said petition to the Family Court at Mumbai. In the application it is stated that the applicant is unemployed, depending on her widowed mother and brother for survival. Besides, she is taking care of a son, aged 19 months (now two years) and that she cannot travel with her son to Karad which is at a spb/- 2 mca48-10.sxw distance of about 300 kilometers from Bombay and that she even cannot afford expenses of travel. No affidavit in reply has been filed denying the averments of the applicant made in the application. Consequently, relying on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Vinisha Jitesh Tolani vs. Jitesh Kishore Tolani, reported in 2010 (5) S.C.C - 748, I am of the view that the application deserves to be allowed. Hence, I pass the following order. ORDER Misc. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). [D.G. KARNIK, J.]