IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3476 of 2011 INDER CHOUDHARY @ INDRADEO PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 10.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. After investigation the police found accusation false against the petitioner and did not sent up the petitioner for trial. Now the petitioner has been summoned under exercise of power under Section 319 Cr. P. C. The impugned order suggests that the witnesses have stated about the complicity of the petitioner but no specific reference to the evidence of any witness has been made in the impugned order. Considering the fact that the petitioner has been summoned under Section 319 Cr. P. C., let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Ghoshi(Hulasganj) P.S. Case No. 114 of 2006 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J. F.T.C.V, Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure. - 2 - Learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner defaults on three consecutive dates during trial. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)