-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.1188 of 2008 Shri Namdeo Mahadeo Kapre ..Petitioner vs. 1.Sou.Anusaya Bhauso Bhondave and another ..Respondents Shri R.S.Kadam for petitioner. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. 28th February, 2008 28th February, 2008 28th February, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The impugned order is interlocutory. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the final order in the suit, then, while challenging the same, he can raise appropriate pleas with regard to refusal of the Trial Court to permit re-examination of the subject witness. Keeping open all these pleas so also the argument at the stage of the trial that there is no ambiquity or discrepancy or inconsistency in the version of doctor, the present petition is dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)