IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL No.213 OF 2004 APPEAL No.213 OF 2004 APPEAL No.213 OF 2004 Namdev K. Horamable ... Appellant Vs. Ganpati S. Horambale ...Respondent Mr. S. K. Jain, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. M. V. Bandiwadekar, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 27, 2006. : JUNE 27, 2006. : JUNE 27, 2006. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent. The respondent had filed the suit restraining the defendant from either dispossessing or from interfering with the joint possession over the land to the extent of 7 acres 37 Gunthas. The trial Court had decreed the suit. The lower Appellate Court has given concurrent finding and dismissed the appeal. There is no substantial question of law involved in the above appeal. Hence, Appeal stands dismissed. However it is made clear that this order will not come in the way of pending proceeding before the Revenue Authority. As far as this order is concerned, this order will not constitute any title in favour of the respondent. [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]