$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12131/2006 M/S DIAMOND ART PRINTERS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr P. S. Pradhan, Advocate. versus COMMISSIOENR OF INDUSTRIES & O ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 08.01.2018 CM No.563/2018 1. The petitioner has filed the present application, inter alia, praying that the petitioner be allotted a plot of land as applied for in terms of the Relocation Scheme of 1996 at the same rate as applicable on the day when the Appeal Committee had considered the petitioner to be eligible for such allotment. The respondents have now allotted a plot to the petitioner in Bawana-II (Bhorgarh), however, the petitioner has been called upon to pay the enhanced charges. 2. The said issue has been squarely covered by the decision of this Court in T. K. Sabharwal v. NCT of Delhi & Ors.: W.P.(C) 7670/2016 decided on 05.01.2018. For the reasons stated in the said decision, the prayer made by the petitioner in the present application cannot be acceded to. 3. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JANUARY 08, 2018/MK