[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION W.P.L.NO.1534 OF 2006 Deepika Mukund Renake ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Mah. & Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.Ashok M.Saraogi Adv.for Petitioner Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni Associated Advocate General with Mr.B.B.Saraf AGP for Respondents ... CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : JULY 19, 2006 DATE : JULY 19, 2006 DATE : JULY 19, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Issues raised in this petition, are also the issues raised in the Writ Petition (L) No.1533 of 2006 which is disposed of today. For the reasons given while disposing of that petition, the contentions raised herein are also rejected. 2. Apart from that on behalf of petitioner the learned counsel raised an additional ground viz;- that the petitioner was eligible to be considered against womens’ quota in the reserved category for [-2-] defence personnel. On instructions on behalf of the Respondents, the learned counsel points out that petitioner stands at serial no.41 in the merit list under the quota of defence personnel. The petitioner has been considered also against the womens’ quota and she could not be admitted in the M.B.B.S. course. Petitioner has been found eligible and seat for ayurvedic has been offered to her. Statement made on behalf of Respondents, is accepted. 3. With the above observations, this petition stands disposed of. [ F.I.REBELLO, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]