IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17084 of 2011 BOUDHU MAHTO @ DHARMVEER KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 18.05.2011. Heard. The earlier rejection order dated 10.10.2007 indicates as if the victim, namely, Kedar Prasad Mehta had identified as one of his abductors. The said Kedar Prasad Mehta has been examined as P.W.6 in Sessions Trial No.23 of 2006 and he has refused either to name or to identify the present petitioner. Whatever has been stated by him in paragraph-6 appears general to be treated as evidence, considering which, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Fast Track Court NO.III, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Sessions Trial No.23 of 2006 arising out of Asthawan(Sara)P.S.Case No.131 of 2005 with following conditions:- (1) That the petitioner shall remain physically present on all dates even there 2 was no purpose of his attendance in the court below. (2) That the petitioner shall not make any attempt either to intimidate or to threaten any witness and any instance in those behalf might be sufficient for the court below to assume that this order had not been passed by this court and the court below shall take steps after cancelling the bonds to commit the petitioner to custody. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha,J.)