IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24241 of 2009 AJAY KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Offences alleged against the petitioner are under sections 302/201//34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioner is not named accused. However, he has been implicated in this case during investigation on the statement the wife of the deceased which has been recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. It is submitted that the petitioner is own brother of the wife of the deceased and he has been implicated in this case on mere suspicion. Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for bail and submits that the wife of the deceased in her statement has categorically stated the name of this petitioner with whom the deceased had gone out of the house along with the accused. Thereafter the accused persons came back but the deceased did not come for which no explanation was given as to what had happened to the deceased. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the offence and submission of the parties, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner in Patna G.R.P.S. case no. 197 of 2008. The prayer for bail is rejected. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J) M.Rahman