HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WPMP NO.15965 OF 2004 and WRIT PETITION NO. 12545 of 2004 Between: 1 B.Shashanna, S/o.Pedda Kannaiah, R/o.Pentlavalli Village, Kollapur Mandal,Mahaboobnagar Dist. 2 P.Nagaraju, S/o.Balaiah, R/o.Pentlavalli Village, Kollapur Mandal,Mahaboobnagar Dist. ... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Dist.Collector, Mahaboobnagar Dist. 2 The Revenue Divisional officer, Wanapathy, Mahaboobnagar Dist. 3 The Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Dept., Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.SRINIVASULU (NP) Counsel for the Respondents: Asst.Government Pleader for Land Acquisition HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WPMP NO.15965 OF 2004 AND WRIT PETITION NO. 12545 of 2004 O R D E R: This is an application to direct the respondents to initiate land acquisition proceedings as per law in respect of the lands of the petitioners acquired under Mini-I-Scheme of Pentlavalli-Kondoor, Stage-I & II and to pay compensation to the petitioners, pending the writ petition. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition submitted that on 24-04-2008 this Court passed an elaborate order, in pursuance of which land acquisition proceedings were initiated and an Award was passed vide proceedings B/2312/97 dated 05-06-2008. She passed on a copy of the Award along with a copy of the counter-affidavit. She submitted that in pursuance of the said Award passed in favour of the petitioners, payments were made through various cheques issued on 04-06-2008 to the petitioners and other similarly situated persons whose lands were acquired under the Project. She also submitted that necessary disciplinary proceedings have been initiated against the then and the present Revenue Divisional Officers, Nagarkurnool, who were found responsible for the undue delay in initiating the land acquisition proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioners is not present to controvert any of the above [per1]mentioned statements made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader. Hence, I am inclined to accept the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader and find that the cause in the writ petition does not survive any longer. The writ petition and the WPMP are, therefore, disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 16th June, 2008 vrn [per1]