1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6783 OF 2005 Mangesh Shankar Khilare .. Applicant ‘ Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6784 OF 2005 Vasant Namdeo Bhise .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondents Mr.G.S.Godbole and N.V.Gangal for applicant Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 5th December 2005. P.C. . Heard Mr.Gangal for applicant and Mr.Saste, A.P.P. for State. Perused the application and annexures thereto. The role 2 attributed to each of the applicant is that the principal accused Arun Bhise is either related or known to them and they have assisted him in establishing an Educational Institution in account of which monies from concerned branch of Satara Dist.Central Cooperative Bank have been transferred. It is not disputed that applicants are the employees of the said bank. It is also not disputed that apart from the role attributed as above, as far as these applicants are concerned, they are not concerned with the syphoning of the funds at the branch of said bank. Some of the employees of bank who have been refused regular bail have been granted bail by this Court. 2. Above facts not being disputed by A.P.P. this is a fit case where applicants deserve to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly following order. i) Applicants shall be enlarged on 3 bail in connection with C.R.No.6 of 2005 registered with Mhaswad Police Station in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. ii) Applicants shall report to the Mhaswad Police station once a week on every Sunday between 5.00 p.m. and 7.00 p.m. till the conclusion of trial. iii) Appplicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement or threat to any prosecution witnesses and shall not in any manner tamper with prosecution evidence. iv) Applicant shall cooperate with the trial Judge in early disposal of the trial. Any attempt by the applicant to delay the trial may be a ground for cancellation of bail. 4 v) Any observation made in this order shall not be construed as any finding or any expression of opinion on the merits of the case at the time of trial. vi) Application disposed of. vii) Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)