IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 19974 of 2008 Between: Gunda Venkateswar Rao S/o. Mallikarjuna Rao, Hindu R./o Doleru Village, Krosuru (M) Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police Guntur District, Guntur. 2 The Inspector of Police Sattenapalli Circle, Sattenapalli, Guntur District. 3 The Station House Officer, Krosur P.S. Krosuru Mandal, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or Order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 herein in interfering with the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary with out any manner of right and in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with life and liberty of the petitioner without following the due process of law and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.L.NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 19974 of 2008 O R D E R: This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner as arbitrary and illegal and without any manner of right and in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India; consequently to direct the respondents not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner without following the due process of law. There is no necessity of going into all the details. Respondent No.3 has ﬁled a detailed counter denying the allegations made by the petitioner. It is further stated that no complaint of whatsoever is received against the petitioner and no case is registered till date, hence, summoning him or his family members to the police station does not arise. There is no necessity of going into all the details. While issuing notice before admission on 16.9.2008, this Court directed that there shall be a direction to respondents 1 to 3 not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members in any manner whatsoever without following due process of law. The said order be treated as final order in the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. C.V. RAMULU, J. Date: 17-11-2008. MVB.