PIL 102/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR MADAN B. LOKUR HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The prayers made in the writ petition are as follows :- Under the circumstances, it is humbly prayed that your lordship would be please d to admit this application, call for the records, issue rules calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a writ in the nature of mandamus/certiorari or other applicable writ, order or direction shall not be issued directing the r espondent No.1 (i) To set up an enquiry Commission to enquiry the illegality in issuing of Smart Card based Driving License and Registration Certificate by the respondent No.2-5. (ii) To direct the respondent No.2-5 to stop issuing the forged Driving Licen se & R.C. with immediate effect which is not according to the N.I.C. & Ministry of Road Transport & Highway Guidelines and (iii) To compensate the harassed consumers due to having forged D.L. & R.C. is sued by the respondent No.2-5. First of all we find that the prayers are extremely broad and blanket directions , as sought for by the petitioner, without any specific allegation, cannot be en tertained even if it is allegedly in public interest. There is nothing to indicate in the writ petition that the issuance of Smart Car d Driving Licences is illegal in any manner whatsoever or that any forged Drivin g Licences are being issued or that consumers are being harassed. If the petitio ner has any specific grievance in this regard, he may take out appropriate proce edings before the appropriate forum. We may mention that Smart Card Driving Licences are issued in exercise of powers conferred by Rule 16(2) of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 and we have no t been shown any discrepancy in the Smart Card Driving Licences that have been i ssued insofar as this case is concerned. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is dismissed.