1 ca 275, 276, 277-2011.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 275 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9823 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 276 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9825 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 277 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9821 OF 2010 Smt.Kaushalya Kashinath Taras since deceased through her legal heirs and representatives a) Sou.Sangita Shamrao Yeole & Ors. ..Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Appearance in above matters - Mr.Ditendra Mishra for the Applicants. In CA No.275/2011 - Mr.Prathamesh Bhargude i/b. Mr.A.B. Avhad for Respondent Nos.2 to 10. In CA No.276/2011 - Mr.Prathamesh Bhargude for Respondent Nos.2 to 4. Mr.A.B. Avhad for Respondent Nos.14 to 20. 2 ca 275, 276, 277-2011.sxw In CA 277/2011 - Mr.A.B. Avhad for Respondent Nos.2, 8 and 10. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J DATED : FEBRUARY 9, 2011. P.C. : 1 The learned Counsel for the applicant has moved this Court for extension of the status quo as was granted by this Court vide Order dated 10th December, 2010. 2 From the perusal of clause (i) of the operative order passed by this Court dated 10th December, 2010, it is clear that the Revisional authority was directed to decide the application for stay within a period of four weeks from the date of the Order. The Court has further continued the order of status quo which was operating during the pendency of the proceedings before the Divisional Commissioner for a period of six weeks 3 ca 275, 276, 277-2011.sxw from the date of the order. 3 The learned Counsel for the applicant has moved this Court since in spite of the order passed by this Court, the Revisional authority has not decided the application for stay. 4 Shri Bhargude, learned Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.10 to 20 submits that now the revision itself is fixed before the Hon'ble Minister on 11th February, 2011. 5 In that view of the matter, the application is disposed of with a direction to the Revisional Authority to decide the revision itself within a period of four weeks from today. As such, the order of status quo which was granted earlier shall continue to operate for a period of six weeks from today. 6 It is made clear that if the Revisional 4 ca 275, 276, 277-2011.sxw Authority fails to decide the revision application within four weeks from today, this Court will be constrained to take a serious view of the matter and will pass appropriate order in the matter. 7 Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this Order. (B.R. GAVAI, J)