HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 291 of 2004 (SS) 1. Surendra Singh Rawat s/o Sri Hayat Songh House No. 356 Jain Gali, Khanjarpur, Roorkee 2. Shyam Singh Rawat s/o Sri Govind Singh Rawat R/o 104 Ashok Nagar, Shivji Colony, Milap Nagar, Roorkee 3. Narbahadur s/o Sri Beerbahadur, Ashjok Nagar, Shivji Colony, Milap Nagar, Roorkee 4. Vijay Singh Rawat s/o Sri Jodh Singh r/o Ashok Nagar, Shivaji Colony, Milap Nagar, Roorkee 5. Dhan Singh Bisht s/o Sri Ram Siongh Bisht r/o Subhash Nagar Roorkee, District Haridwar …………. Petitioner versus 1. Director Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 2. Controller of Administration, Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, District Haridwar ……….. Respondents Writ Petition No. 390 of 2004 (SS) 1. P.B. Pun s/o Sri Thaman Pun R/o Durga Colony, Gurga Line Rookee 2. Ravindra Singh Rawat s/o Sri sadho Singh Rawat R/o Subhash Nagar, Roorkee 3. Stey Singh Kandari s/o Sri Prem Singh Kandari, R/o 6/123, Shastri Nagar Paniyala Road, Roorkee 4. Jaman Singh s/o Sri Narayan Singh, Shivaji colony, Post office Mailap Nagar, District Haridwar 5. Anil Kumar s/o Sri Lalita Prasad, Ganeshpur, Roorkee, District Haridwar ………………. Petitioners Versus 1. Director Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee 2. Controller of Administration, Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, District Haridwar……. Respondents Sri Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners A.S.G. for the respondents. Dated: 6.3.2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Sri Lok Pal Singh counsel for the petitioners and A.S.G. for the respondents. By the present writ petitions, the petitioners have prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to remove the petitioners from the work and post of the guards until appointment of regular incumbents. According to the petitioners they got employment in C.B.R.I. Roorkee through Ex-Soldiers Corporation, Dehradun from 1.1.96 and from 21.4.1999 they are in the direct employment of C.B.R.I. Roorkee and they are getting a consolidated salary of Rs. 2272/-. The grievance of the petitioners is that the authorities of C.B.R.I. Roorkee are going to employ 17 security persons through contractor while the petitioners are in direct employment of the department and they cannot be replaced by contract labourers. At the time of arguments the counsel for the petitioners confined his prayer for disposal of the representation of the petitioners dated 9.3.2004. In view of above, respondents are directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioners within a month after obtaining the certified copy of this order. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Dated: 6.3.2006 Rajesh Tandon, J. *Dhyani