IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2011 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1933 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 175 of 2010() ----------------------------- REVN. PETITIONER(S): PW1/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT: --------------------------------------------- SHEENA MUHAMMED, D/O.MUHAMMED, VANIYAPPURAYIL VEEDU, KARIKKOTTU VILLAGE, KUNNAM KARA, KUNNAM BHAGAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU SRI.M.RAVIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): ACCUSED AND STATE: --------------------------------- 1. NAZAR, S/O.PAREETH, PULLOLIL VEEDU, KOVALLOOR KARA, POTHANIKKADU VILLAGE. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.T.RAMAPRASAD UNNI THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/10/2011, ALONGWITH MAT.A.NOS.706 OF 2011 AND 688 OF 2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ----------------------------------- Crl.R.P.No.175 OF 2010 & Mat.A.Nos.706 & 688 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 28th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. These three cases are taken together at the request of parties in view of the settlement of the litigation in mediation. We record the terms of settlement arrived in the mediation, without prejudice to the interest of the minor child Ashna. The captioned appeals and revision are, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. Following this, the Family Court, Thodupuzha will take up O.P.No.343/10 and have that also dismissed as withdrawn on the basis of the terms of settlement. The respondent in the appeals shall withdraw the complaint made to the Director of Animal Husbandry in terms of clause 4 of the settlement. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR, Judge. kkb.31/10.