IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.217 of 2011 Sri Prem Kumar Versus Smt. Sunita Devi & Ors ----------- 02. 08.11.2011 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. From the impugned order, it appears that the prayer of the defendant-petitioner for permitting him to lead evidence in rebuttal has been rejected. As the impugned order is interlocutory in nature and therefore the stamp reporter has correctly pointed out that the proper remedy for the petitioner was by filing an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010(2) PLJR 954 it is just and proper to allow to the petitioner to convert this civil revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is granted four weeks time to convert this Civil Revision into a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India failing which this Civil Revision shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. Nitesh ( V. Nath, J.)