IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5367 of 1996 Between: Akella Laxmidevi, W/o Late Subrahmanya Sankaram, R/o Mukkamala, Ambajipet Mandal, E.G.Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P., Rep. by Prl. secretary Revenue (Endtt. II) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad,. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Amalapuram, E.G.Dist. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Ambajipeta, E.G.Dist. 4 The Executive Officer, Sri Uma Raghaveswaraswamy Vari Temple Mukkamala (V), Ambajipeta (M), E.G.Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or any appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents in issuing G.O.Ms.No. 456 dt:29.9.95 Revenue (Endt.II) Department, ordering district Revenue Officials to take advance possession of the land belonging to 4th respondent Devasthanam Covered by RS.No.51/2 and 52/3 measuring Ac.3.48 cents situate at Mukkamala (V), Ambajipet (M), E.G. Districgt from the lawful possession of the petitioner herein as illegal, arbitrary, malafide and violative of Arts. 19(1)(g) and 300-A of Constitution of India and for a consequential order directing the respondents to drop all further proceedings including dispossession of the petitioner from her lawful possession of the above lands. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CH.DHANAMJAYA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent No.4: None appeared The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the validity of G.O.Ms.No.456, Revenue (Endt.II) Department dated 29-9-1995. It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader for Revenue that the validity the said G.O. was upheld by this Court by judgment dated 20-4-1998 in W.P.No.4957 of 1996 and batch and therefore this writ petition is also liable to be dismissed. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed in terms of the judgment in W.P.No.4957 of 1996 and batch. No costs. ________ 8-2-2005 asp To 1 The Prl. Secretary, Revenue (Endtt. II) Department, Government of A.P, Secretariat, Hyderabad,. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Amalapuram, E.G.Dist. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Ambajipeta, E.G.Dist. 4 The Executive Officer, Sri Uma Raghaveswaraswamy Vari Temple Mukkamala (V), Ambajipeta (M), E.G.Dist. 5. Two C.Cs. to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 6. Two C.D. copies.