R.S.A No. 4272 of 2008 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A No. 4272 of 2008 Date of decision : March 02, 2009 Dogar Singh, ...... Appellant. v. Paramjit Kaur and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Mukul Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Raj Kumar Kakkar, Advocate for the appellant. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This is an appeal against concurrent judgments of the Courts below decreeing the suit of the plaintiff/respondents for recovery of Rs.50,000/-. Counsel for the appellant has argued that the suit has been decreed only on the basis of the presumption that the defendant/appellant had given a cheque of Rs.50,000/- and the Courts below presumed that since the cheque was given, therefore, the appellant must have obtained a loan. In the first place what is being challenged in this Appeal is a R.S.A No. 4272 of 2008 ::2:: pure finding of fact regarding whether the appellant had obtained a loan or not. Secondly, I asked learned counsel for the appellant as to why the cheque was given to the plaintiff. He has urged that in fact the plaintiff had approached the appellant for a loan and the appellant had given him a cheque with the stipulation that before the plaintiff presented the cheque, he would execute a pronote. In my opinion the version put forward by counsel for the appellant is more fantastic than the allegations made by the respondent. Resultantly, both on the grounds that no substantial question of law arises as well as on appreciation of the questions of fact, this appeal is dismissed with, however, no order as to costs. ( AJAY TEWARI ) March 02, 2009. JUDGE `kk'