S^ST~''~~SJ "-•r-~^s ^?T WK, ?hT t^Rft 7TPT-cri?Nt. ycft ^F^TTKr, aTPTT ^egT-ft, d^'tftcl-fl^'^^ra, f^TcTT- <t?TR<41 (®.~IT.) ^E[cf>, TfuTT? ^?mcT t"^> ^ll'isll ^^5TR ^jTcTT *TR^I (&.TT.) ^/ ^ '% $^^1 ^•^T^^^T ^TT'ft ^. ^^ ^raf.ra, ?i^tcr ^^ 3^^icnoiui / [.ff) Sll^ricb ^. 1 cT 2/ 3)d|clc;ct3 ^. 6 cT 7 BTlftcT 3td<iTc1 ETTCT 1 7 3 sffe? ^TTcT Slf^Rf'y.H 1 988 L r s^ r 1 HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBIIASPUR DIVISION BENCH: HON'BLEMR.I.IVI.( HON'BLEJVIR.G.MINHAJUDDIN. M.A.fclNo. 6>t6 ^Oia)2-olv (PRNo.58/-!1) Umendra Sinah and others Vs Rewa Prasad and dthers 1^.., <. .;"-^i None for theappeltants. ORDER(6ral» (10th August, 2011) Perl.l This is a defective appeal as compulsory deposit under Seetlon- 173 ofthe Motor Vehicies Act, 1988 hasnot been made and as such, the appeal is not entertainable. List is being revised. The matter was called out twice, However, no one appeared onbehalf oftheappetlantstopress this appeai!. !n these circumstances,we are leftwith no ioption but to dismiss fhis appeal for warrt of prosecution. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge