IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 29TH OCTOBER 2007 / 7TH KARTHIKA 1929 WP(C).No. 29556 of 2007(R) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ FABIYA D/O.SIVADASAN NAIR, AGED 35 YEARS SIVASADANAM, EDANADU, PUTHENKAVU, CHENGANNOOR, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) SRI.P.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR M.G.UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE REGISTRAR, M.G.UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, M.G.UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. BY SC FOR UNIVERSITY SRI.T.A. SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 29556 OF 2007 --------------------- Dated this the 29th day of October, 2007 J U D G M E N T Ext.P2 application made by the petitioner for betterment of her M.A Degree Examination results did not evoke any response and hence this writ petition has been filed. Petitioner mainly relies on Ext.P3 downloaded from the website of the University that betterment is possible for PG courses. It was relying on Ext.P3, Ext.P2 request was made. 2. On instruction, learned Standing Counsel for the University submits that the provision in Ext.P3 providing for betterment of results for PG students was a mistake and in fact there is no such examination. If what is relied on Ext.P3 is really a mistake, then the petitioner cannot rest her claim on Ext.P3. There is no other documents relied on by the petitioner. If that be so, the writ petition fails and it is accordingly dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE vps