IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 19TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 28TH BHADRA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 2910 of 2011 -------------------------------- CC.294/2010 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, PALA .................... PETITIONER/2N ACCUSED: P.RAVEENDRAN, ADVOCATE, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.N.K.BHASKARAN NAIR, HOUSE NO.D6/84, KSHB COLONY, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., CALICUT-8, NELLIKODE VILLAGE, KOVOOR DESOM. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT: 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALA POLICE STATION, PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 141. 3. MOHANAN, S/O.NARAYANAN, POURNAMI, CHANDA KAVALA, KIDANGOOR, KOTTAYAM DIST-686 572. R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAISURYA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN CRMC 2910/2011 ANNEXURE-I TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT FILED AS CC 294/2010 UNDER SECTION 173 CRPC BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE JFCM PALA PURSUANT TO THE REGISTRATION OF CRIME 241/2009 OF PALA POLICE STATION ANNEXURE-II TRUE COPY OF THE FI REPORT IN CONNECTION WITH CRIME 241/2009 OF PALA POLICE STATION ANNEXURE-III TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF APPOINTMENT OF THE PETITIONER AS THE LEGAL ADVISOR OF M/S.DREAMTOUCH INFOSOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ON 8.1.08 ANNEXURE-IV TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON REQUEST MADE ON 28.9.09 BY M/S DIL CENTRAL COMMITTEE KANJIKUZHI JKOTTAYAM-4 ADDRESSED TO VARIOUS CIRCLE INSPECTORS AND SUB INSPECTORS OF POLICE STATION IN AND AROUND THE STATE OF KERALA ANNEXURE-V TRUE COPY OF THE PUBLIC APPEAL DT. 7.10.09 ISSUED BY M/S.DIL COMPANY CENTRAL COMMITTEE /TRUE COPY/ N.K.Balakrishnan, J. ------------------------------------------- Crl.M.C.No.2910 of 2011 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of September, 2011 ORDER This petition is filed to quash Annexure-I final report filed against the petitioner/second accused alleging offences under Sections 406 and 420 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the defacto complainant and several other persons were cheated by the accused by receiving money from those persons promising to give job. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that there are other aggrieved persons. The Investigating Officer prima facie found that there are materials to proceed against the accused. Hence, I find no reason to quash Annexure-I final report. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. (N.K.Balakrishnan, Judge) tkv