:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.260 OF 2003. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.260 OF 2003. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.260 OF 2003. The State of Maharashtra. ..Appellant. Versus. 1.Tukaram Aba Patil & 22 ors. ..Respondents. ---- Mr. D.S.Mhaispurkar, APP for the State. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 8, 2004. DATE : DECEMBER 8, 2004. DATE : DECEMBER 8, 2004. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. D.H.Mhaispurkar, APP for the State. Perused judgment. The Trial Court has found the evidence on record inadequate and acquitted the accused. We do not find any reason to interfere in it. The view taken by the Trial Court is possible one. Leave to appeal is therefore, rejected. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (S.B.MHASE,J.) Login:ast/sbm.