Criminal Misc. No. A-647-MA of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. A-647-MA of 2010 Date of Decision:- 22.7.2011 State of Punjab .....Applicant Versus Baldeep Kaur and others .....Respondents Criminal Revision No. 895 of 2010 (O&M) Baljit Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL Present:- Ms. Gurveen H. Singh, Addl. AG Punjab for State of Punjab. Mr. Amrik Singh, Advocate for petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 895 of 2010 **** SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J.(Oral) This order will dispose of Criminal Misc. No.A-647-MA of 2010 and Criminal Revision No. 895 of 2010. State of Punjab has filed an application under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for granting leave to file appeal against the judgment dated 28.10.2009 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Rupnagar, whereby out of six accused four accused namely Baldeep Kaur, Ranjit Kaur, Devinder Singh and Ranjit Singh were acquitted and remaining two accused Criminal Misc. No. A-647-MA of 2010 2 namely Jagjit Singh @ Jeeti and Baljit Singh were convicted under section 302 and 302/34 IPC and under Section 27 of Arms Act. Accused Jagjit Singh @ Jeeti was awarded death sentence whereas accused Baljit Singh was sentenced for life imprisonment. When the Murder Reference No.4 of 2009 and Criminal Appeal No. 989-DB of 2009 filed by the above mentioned convicts were listed for hearing, the above mentioned application for leave to appeal filed by the State of Punjab as well as Criminal Revision petition filed by the complainant were neither listed for hearing along with above said cases nor during the course of hearing the counsel for the State brought to the notice of this Court that the State has filed an application for leave to appeal against the acquittal of the above mentioned accused. The counsel for the complainant has also not pointed out that any criminal revision petition has been filed by the complainant against the above mentioned judgment. We have already expressed our opinion while deciding the murder reference and criminal appeal. In view of above mentioned facts, the application for leave to appeal filed by State of Punjab is declined and the criminal revision petition filed by the complainant is dismissed. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE 22.7.2011 ( MOHINDER PAL ) reema JUDGE