IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42358 of 2009 1. Upendra Singh. 2. Mahendra Singh. Both son of Late Babulal Singh, resident of village-Birgaon, P.S.-Mahishi, District-Saharsa. ………….Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. ………….Opp. Party. ----------- 2/ 18.12.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 266 of 2009 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 504, 468, 384, 420 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioners submits that initially, a complaint case was filed and on that basis police case has been instituted. The allegation in the F.I.R. relates to a sale deed, which was executed in the year 1996 with respect to transfer of land pertaining to plot No 1016 and 1026. Allegation is that a forged sale deed was executed by the petitioners. Counsel for the petitioners further submits that the allegations do not make out any criminal case. Rather remedy available to the informant, was before Civil Court, by filing a suit for cancellation of sale deed. The F.I.R. has been instituted just to put pressure on the petitioners. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of above named petitioners is allowed. They are directed to be released on bail, in case of their appearance, within a 2 period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 266 of 2009 subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Sanjeet/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)