THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A.No.921 of 2009 JUDGMENT: The respondent filed O.S.No.71 of 2009 in the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Eluru, against the appellant, for partition. She filed I.A.No.1653 of 2009 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C., with a prayer to restrain the appellant from cutting away the mango trees situated in Item-I of the plaint schedule. The appellant opposed the I.A. Through its order, dated 18.08.2009, the trial Court allowed the I.A. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the C.M.A. came to be filed in the light of the orders passed in other interlocutory application, and that his client does not intend to cut the mango trees at all. If that be so, the appellant cannot be said to have been aggrieved by the order of temporary injunction. Hence, the C.M.A. is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dated:27.08.2009. GJ