IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 14804 of 2005 Between: Smt. C. Amruthamma, W/o. C Ramakrishna Reddy, of Pagidyal Village, Gandeed Mandal, R.R. District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector-II (CS), R.R. District at Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Attapur Village, Rajendranagar Mandal R.R. District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to set-aside the order of the R2 in Proc. No. 395/2005 dt. 26-02-2005 which is illegal, improper and which was passed without giving an opportunity and against the principles of natural justice and pass such other order or orders in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.BOLLAM LINGAIAH YADAV Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court, at the stage of admission, made the following : ORAL ORDER The petitioner’s authorization for running a fair price shop in Pagidyal village, Gandeed Mandal, Ranga Reddy District was suspended by the order of the Special Grade Deputy Collector & Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Ranga Reddy District dated 26-02-2005. The petitioner claims that she is not involved in any irregularities and that the Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Ganded has also in a report dated 07-04-2005 addressed to the 2nd respondent pointed out that the liability for the alleged irregularities is that of the Panchayat Secretary and that the petitioner is in no way involved. Despite such report by the Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Ganded, she is being continued under suspension and the 1st respondent failed to dispose of the appeal, is the substantive grievance in this writ petition. In the circumstances, after hearing the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies also, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of the appeal of the petitioner expeditiously and in any event within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order, after considering any other material that the petitioner might place before the 1st respondent. The petitioner is at liberty to place before the 1st respondent-appellate authority any material that she chooses to including the report of Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Ganded dated 07-04-2005, within one (1) week from today along with an affidavit in support of her submissions. No order as to costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 11TH JULY 2005 *TSNR To 1 The Joint Collector-II (CS), R.R. District at Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Attapur Village, Rajendranagar Mandal R.R. District. 3. Two CCS to G.P for Civil Supplies, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad(OUT) 4. Two C.D.Copies.