IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15918 of 2010 NARAYAN MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that theft was committed on 13.2.2007 detected only on 17.4.2007 and the petitioner is only a guard having no concern with theft. One of the co-accused Ramji Tiwari, Bhandar Pal now is allowed bail but at the same time co-accused Sheo Kumar Giri, Surakcha Nirikchak is refused bail by a Bench of this Court and petitioner is also concern with security of Sugar Mill. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)