IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.982 of 2009 MITA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 19.3.2010. Heard Sri Abhhay Shanker Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner with the C.R.No.80 of 2003(Tr.No.845 of 2007). The grievance of the petitioner is that a clear case under Sections 376 and 511 of the IPC was made out by the facts of the case specially by the evidence adduced by the complainant during trial. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Samastipur who disposed of Cr.Revision Petition No.472 of 2007 has given reasons in support of the order besides the order passed by the Magistrate which also contains certain reasons. Considering those findings, this court is not inclined to interfere with the orders passed by the Magistrate and the Additional Sessions Judge. However, the learned Magistrate is not to be prejudiced by the findings recorded by either himself or by learned Additional Sessions Judge and proceed to dispose of the trial purely on the merits of the matter. The petition is disposed of with the observations made above. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )