CWP-9564/10 (1) In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench, Jaipur O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9564/2010 Girdhari Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. Date of Order :: 26/7/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Mahendra Sharma, for petitioner. Counsel submits that petitioner while holding the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector was placed under suspension vide order dt. 11.8.08 (Annx.2) on account of criminal case being registered for offences punishable under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Counsel further submits that challan has been filed but charge has not been framed against him so far and trial will take its own course while he is facing agony of suspension for almost 2 years by now. Counsel placed reliance upon the judgment in Prem Prakash Mathur Vs. State, 2005(9) RDD 3962; and Samrath Singh Vs. State, 2010(1) WLC 562 and argued that no circular can govern the discretion of the competent authority which has to take an independent view of the matter whether or not to put an employee under suspension which was desirable in the interest of administration. Order of suspension impugned is indeed appealable u/R.22 of CC&A Rules,1958. CWP-9564/10 (2) In view of efficacious remedy of appeal available to the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to entertain the instant petition. Consequently, the petition fails and is hereby dismissed. However, the petitioner will be at liberty to avail of remedy under law. If appeal is preferred by the petitioner before the competent authority under CC&A Rules, 1958, the same may be decided by passing speaking order taking note of the judgments referred to supra within three months of submission of appeal and communicate the decision to the petitioner who if still feels aggrieved, will be free to avail the remedy under law. (Ajay Rastogi), J. VS Shekhawat/- 9564cw2010July26FnlDE-SusRmdy.doc