IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1913 of 2008 With C.R. No.1821 of 2008 ***** In C.R. No.1913 of 2008: 1. Jairam Pandey, son of Late Ramashray Pandey, 2. Indu Pandey, wife of Sri Jairam Pandey. Both residents of Mohalla at K.M. Tank, Laheriasarai, P.O. and P.S. Laheriasarai, District Darbhanga. ….Defendants…Petitioners. Versus Mahipal Yadav, son of late Lakshmi Narayan Yadav, resident of Mohalla K.M. Tank, Laheriasarai, P.O. & P.S. Laheriasarai, district- Darbhanga. …Plaintiff…Opp. Party. In C.R. No.1821 of 2008: 1. Jairam Pandey, son of Late Ramashray Pandey, 2. Indu Pandey, wife of Sri Jairam Pandey. Both residents of Mohalla at K.M. Tank, Laheriasarai, P.O. and P.S. Laheriasarai, District Darbhanga. ….Defendants…Petitioners. Versus Mahipal Yadav, son of late Lakshmi Narayan Yadav, resident of Mohalla K.M. Tank, Laheriasarai, P.O. & P.S. Laheriasarai, district- Darbhanga. …Plaintiff…Opp. Party. ******** 06- 11.11.2011 Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur for the petitioners, and Mr. Amarendra Narain for the opposite party. The Defendants (tenants) are the petitioners. C.R.1913 of 2008 is directed against the order dated 15.4.2008, passed by the learned Munsif 1st court, Darbhanga, in Eviction Suit No.18 of 2005, whereby the plaintiff’s application for payment of rent under section 2 15 of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act 1982, has been allowed, and the defendants (tenants) have been directed to make payment of rent at the rate of Rs.300/- per month, along with arrears of rent for 36 months. The analogous C.R. No.1821 of 2008 has been preferred by the tenants and is directed against the order dated 6.8.2008, passed by the learned Munsif 1st court, Darbhanga, in the aforesaid suit whereby the application for review of the aforesaid order dated 15.4.2008 has been rejected. 2. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. The opposite party herein had instituted Eviction Suit No.19 of 2003 for eviction of the defendants (tenants) from the suit premises which has since been decreed by judgment dated 26.9.2011, passed by the learned Munsif 1st court, Darbhanga, on the ground of personal necessity. It is thus evident that the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties is established. Furthermore, in so far as the aforesaid order dated 15.4.2008, is concerned, we are of the view that the 3 learned trial court on consideration of the materials before him determined that the rent may be paid at the rate of Rs.300/- per month. It is unassailable within the narrow confines of revisional jurisdiction. 3. C.R. No.1913 of 2008 is dismissed. In that view of the matter, the analogous C.R. No.1821 of 2008 has also to be dismissed. It goes without saying that the interim order dated 20.1.2009, passed in C.R. No.1821 of 2008, automatically stands vacated. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/