IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 3202 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION : 03.03.2008 Smt. Bisani Devi .... PETITIONER Versus UCO Bank, Zonal Office, Bank Square, Sector 17, Chandigarh ..... RESPONDENT CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the Possession-cum-Sale Notice dated 4.2.2008 passed by the respondent bank. The petitioner is not the borrower. The loan was taken by her husband. In view of this fact, we are not inclined to entertain this petition filed by the petitioner for quashing the proceedings under the Security and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. Faced with this situation, counsel for the petitioner prays that CWP No. 3202 of 2008 -2- the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition without prejudice to her right to approach the bank authorities. Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for. However, if the petitioner approaches the respondent bank, the hardship being faced by her will be taken into consideration by the respondent bank. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE March 03, 2008 ( RAKESH KUMAR GARG ) ndj JUDGE