IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.28843-M of 2009 Date of Decision:28.9.2010 Satish Kumar Dhir .... Petitioner Versus Janak Dulari .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Balram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Bajaj, Advocate for the respondent. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The parties are agreed that arguments made on 22.9.2010 was only qua Crl. M.No.33107-09 of 2010, which has to be dismissed as the main petition already stood admitted. However, today learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the main petition with liberty to raise all the pleas before the trial Court. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 28.9.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE