IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16101 of 2007 KANCHAN KUMARI, W/O SHRI TARA NAND KUMAR, R/O VILLAGE-MAHUA, P.O.-ARAHA, P.S.-GHAILADH, DISTRICT-MADHEPURA. …………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PURNEA. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, PURNEA. 4. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BANMANKHI, PURNEA. 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, PURNEA. 6. THE AREA/REGIONAL EDUCATION OFFICER, PURNEA. 7. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, BANMANKHI, PURNEA. 8. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BANMANKHI, PURNEA. 9. THE SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT BAHORA, BANMANKHI, PURNEA. 10. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT, BAHORA, BANMANKHI, PURNEA. 11. THE IN-CHARGE HEAD MASTER, LIJJU UCHCH VIDAYALAYA BUDHIYA, PURNEA. 12. THE HEAD MASTER, PRIMARY SCHOOL, MASURIYA, MUSHARI, PURNEA. ………………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 27.08.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that during the pendency of this writ application the petitioner’s services have been reinstated as Panchayat Shikshak. However, he submits that withheld salary of 11 months has not been paid to her. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents which is silent about the withheld salary of the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority for his remaining grievances which is directed - 2 - to be considered and disposed of in accordance with law within the time fixed by the Rules. The writ application is disposed of thus. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)