Cr.WP No.14 of 2007. 14.5.2008. Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General, for the respondents. The learned Deputy Advocate General states that the parole cannot be granted unless otherwise recommended by the Police Authorities of the District to which he belongs, i.e. Aligarh District Police Authorities, who have recommended against the grant of parole. From the report it is not apparent that what are the credentials of the petitioner, his history sheet, how many cases he has been convicted in/the number of cases pending against him. Accordingly, it can be said that this report does not have any reason in support to enable him to inform this Court about the decision taken by the State. Accordingly, we direct the State of Himachal Pradesh to consider the parole case of the petitioner ignoring the recommendation of the Police Authorities but in the light of Section 4 of the Himachal Pradesh Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1968 within one month from today. With these observations, the petition is finally disposed of. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. 14th May, 2008. (Rajiv Sharma), J. (tr)