IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2011 / 17TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 18527 of 2011(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. ABHISHEK PRAKASH, NOW RESIDING AT ROOM NO.68, SAROVAR HOSTEL, CUSAT, KOCHI-682 022. 2. KSHITIZ SRIVASTAVA, NOW RESIDING AT ROOM NO.68, SAROVAR HOSTEL, CUSAT, KOCHI-682 022. 3. ABHISHEK KUMAR, NOW RESIDING AT ROOM NO.68, SAROVAR HOSTEL, CUSAT, KOCHI-682 022. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN SRI.P.P.RAMACHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. VICE CHANCELLOR, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KOCHI-682 022. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KOCHI-682 022. SRI.S.P.A.PILLAY, SC, UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.18527/11 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE MARK SHEET OF THE 1ST PETITIONER IN THE 8TH SEMESTER EXAMINATION. EXT.P1(a): TRUE COPY OF THE MARK SHEET OF THE 2ND PETITIONER IN THE 8TH SEMESTER EXAMINATION. EXT.P1(b): TRUE COPY OF THE MARK SHEET OF THE 3RD PETITIONER in THE 7TH SEMESTER EXAMINATION. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF INSTRUMENTATION OF CUSAT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P2(a): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF INSTRUMENTATION OF CUSAT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXT.P2(b): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF INSTRUMENTATION OF CUSAT TO THE 3RD PETITIONER. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 18527 OF 2011 (M) ===================== Dated this the 8th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the results were declared, 1st petitioner failed in “Elective II Digital Signal Processing” of 8th Semester, 2nd petitioner failed in “Micro Controller and Micro Computer Based Instrumentation” of 8th Semester and the 3rd petitioner failed in “Biomedical Instrumentation” of the 7th Semester. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp