')4 (W gig ma HmHAQOURT OF JUDIcgvruaE OF ggHATTmGL-xrzx AT BILASPUR (c .G.¥ W my? PETITIom No. 163 I L ' 01v 2001 (PETITION UNDER Amxmgs 226/2‘23 0.? THE cowSTI TwirlON OF INDI A) ‘ _ HBTITIONEE S : W. (1.) ‘Galib Memori a1 ,,Educatior€330ci‘ety, Sectoné, Bhileaixaegistered No. 3408) Through, Shri Tahir Khan Prasiaent, Gal‘ib Memoriei Educational Society, C Market Sector-6, ’Bhila‘i Nagar, Distt. Durg (c.<;.). Mohd. Tahir Khan; Aged about 51 years, 5/0 Late Shri Ismail Khan, R/o 9r .No. l6~E,, Straet¢30, Sector-J Bhixai Nagarg, Distt. burg. I VERSUS W RESPOMDENTS : 3(1) M. The State cf Chhattiagarh. Through, ”nae 3écgetary, Department of Camerca & InduStrie‘s, Secretariatae (3.x. ghawank RAI FUR . m Registrar. 0f Firms & Societies, 0/5.. Anupam Nagar, TN. Tmjer, RFaIPUR. m The A$s¥tt£egistrar of Firms &. Societies, 0/5, mupam Hagar, zuv. Tower, RAIm. contd...2v Aejazuddin, Aged 48 yrs.,S/o Sumsuddin,R_/o Railway Avenue, Qr—S/E, Sector—6, Bhilai Nagar, Distzt. Durg (C.G.) . ‘ Abdul Sahid, Aged 44 yéars, 5/0 A.Z.Kha.n,R/O Qt. 16/13., Street—Q3, Bhilai NagarrDistt. L Eurg. I.A.Javed, 5/0 S.A.Javr~:d,C/o §psara Talki88, Distt :Durg . rMohd.Zi_a, 3/0 “011:3 Razak, R/o SM-49, ?admana— bh pur ,' Dung . $.A5Mabud, S/Gmat kncwn, R/o MIG 2/98, Hudco 'Colcny, Amdi “agar, Bhilai, Dis£t. Durg (c.G.). ) M.A.shaf1que, S/o M.A.sayeed, R/o Gnu/B, $tree£—6, SectOr—lm Bhilai Nagar,Dmg. Imam Khan’ 3/0 Aliyar Khan, R/o Q‘r. 4/13,‘ Streetho, Sector-7,13h11ai Nagar, Durgp crabby Khan, s/o Nadir Khan, R/o 21/1/ Mms, Nanaini'Roaci, Bhilai Nagar, Distt. Burg. ‘ HafizhMmhd. Platoon, 3/0 Shrj. Fazlur'E‘ehman, R/o Camp No.2, Bhilai Nagar, Distt.Durq. M.$.Khan¢ 5/0 Ni;U.Khan, R/o Nizami Chowk, Farid Nagar; Bhilai, Distt.Durg (C.G.). 14) Mohd.5ami Khan, S/o Babban Khan, R/o Ayyappa Nagar, D1$tt.Durg .(C.G.') . M.1.Khan,s/¢ M.‘6.Khan,R/a 115 L3:G,Hudco Colony, Amdi Nagat, 3i$tt.Durg. :~«x¢hd.Ja111,"s/o Hazrat $9.1, R/oler.13/B, streetAaSector-l, Bhilai Naga‘r, Distt. Burg (c.G.). Dr.%.Ham6ani, S/O‘Habib Abubakr R/a 31/7, Nehru Na‘gar (East), Bhilai Nagalj‘ Distt. Durg (¢.G.). Cnta‘ O i u ‘3 x‘r, K7 Mohd. Hanif, 5/63 Mohd.Karamat.R/o Patel Bakary, supela, Distt .Durg. Hajj. Karim Bux S/o Mithu R/o Yatem Khana, Fax-‘16 Nagar,3h.ilai,Di$tt.Durg (6.6.) . M.$.A1am, S/o Mohd Akhtar,R/o Bihar Boot House, Jawahar Market Camp “10.3 Bhilai Nagar, D;stt Burg. 21) M Badge Alam, 3/0 M A Abdi,R/o Jawahar Bcjot House, Jawahar Markeg g 1&1, Distt. Durg’ Mahbcob Khan. S/o A.Khan, R/o 350,M:EG-2, Hudco Colony, kndi Nagar,Bh11a1, Distt. \4 Dtmg (C.G .3 . Mohd. Ismail Khan; s/‘a Not know“ R/o Farid Na'gari Bhilai, Distt. Burg. Shaikh Shahbuddin, 3/0 M.M.A1am, R/o Ayyappa Nagar,3hi1ai. Biathnurg; Abdul Sattar, 5/6 mu. R/o §3r.18/3.3treet No.29, $ector—5. Bhilai Nagar,, Distt. Burg (C.G.). g M.A.Sa1eem, Elwtion Officer, R/o MIG.I/65;3 Hudco Colony, Amdi 'Nagar, Bhilai, w Di’stt. Durg (cs) . f 25) Petition Under Articles 226/227 of the Con$titution o£ #India . §je petitioner, most humbly $ubmits as under:- ?articu1ars of thegetitioner 3- \ As given in the causa—title. Patticulars of the Responden‘és; =— As given in the cause—title. contci . .4 ’\\\ 3a W, mm? W aaém" m 8. 10 .2001 Shri AR .N . Tiwari. learned Drvm .~K.shukla.v DydAdvoc dent / .stateia. . “ e shri ‘T,K.T1wari. learne No.17 to 23. . Shri A19k,gBakshi,;z leatn é‘; counsel for: the responé nts L counsel: for . the ‘ pegiticner . te General for the respon- cqu‘nsel for the respondents Heard .7 H’gO R-D E R‘ iThe matter cancernse'ele tion :ofoffice Bearers of d present petition was issuedw. ywth'e Registrar on 31.1.01 . ~ eil have. heard counsel: re resehting. the parties at some length on the-question £2 maintainability of this m/ Registrikaran ‘Niyam." 19.73., The said provision may _ Vby‘the Re‘gistrar,‘to. hersta‘tome" N a ei’Gve’rnnt. ew ‘. ’ Yi:.‘.is}§$l.?.9.9.1: WW “Fa-£09 _ mmmm W“ 'ékwnam 1m‘€i1%tz'%rm% ' ; WW(W> ’ WNW WW WTWR WW WW$I§§H ’%sr.f?mawr&¥i' As xsta‘txggBoVé} ihé order which has h..a£ impugned L. in this'writ petition was issued by the Registrar. I 7 It is therefore submitted onrbehalf otthe respandents that the writ petitiont? ought to .have approached the Sta te .Gcvernment if 'Re'gis‘trérii ’ 'Shri'Rajiv ‘Srivas’tav ‘,"learned’counsel for the etitioner submits that t e writ petition‘k‘ris entitled rto have a remedy feund be ore this Ceurt under Artiche 226 of the constitution India. in as much as the order “passedx-by theRegi-strar ,'- respondent No.2 is’ ) ‘withou’t’ jurisdi‘ctibn.’ a. It may be" etated. that when (_ the matter was presented rLefore the Registrar éitw egaihst the order passed by the Assistant-l‘Regit‘strzar;wncx such: submission was made : before the Registrar .n - in: otheryw‘ord T thexrrxiest’ionnof ..jur'isdiction wasn‘ot raised(beforeatheaRegistrar, ..;I.n§act, Registrar examined »th'e,;:entire:.ma»tter andawpavssed ifinal orders. 1,: Mr .srivastawaz Isuhnits‘ that: the «guest ion of _ jurisdiction' can be r’a‘isédaa’t anyi :s‘’tage bf the ‘ >pr‘ocee&ih‘gs:',a even despite, the fact 'uthat suoh objec— tion was * not raised speoiiricalily: before: the; Registrar . ‘ on the whole,. ”remedy which canbezzaivai‘lable under Article~226~ofuthe constitutibmof India is also avaiiaible,:be£orex the Stat G‘overrmentéias far as the merit of :th‘ei case is; eo‘,nc'rn,ed.::,though there may be some difference/in the. 's : andxexercise of 1urisdir- tion. GRPRJ—‘FS/3 11 1/200 1—50,000. (Ctd . . . 3. . ) grieved by, the [order of the W ’\ a > c e XLHGZZ 3a:mma%i %F@,%aF@I WW P 161/2001 w "" *\ x0 \\