/1T ’" Chhannu Lal Sahu S/o Shri Maikoo Lal Sahu Age about 4O years, AssistantTeacher Govt. Primary SchooL Tokaro Abhanpur, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) Ram AwatarYadav S/o Shri Guhan Yadav, Age about 45 years, AssistantTeacher R/o Village - Javainbantha, P.O. - Khola, Abhanpur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) Smt. Shyamlata Dhruv W/o Shri Shankar Lal Dhruv, Age about 43 years, AssistantTeacher R/oVilIage - Baktara, Tah. — Abhanpur, Distt: Raipur (C.G.) Tiharu Ram Sahu S/o Shri Khorbahra Ram Sahu, Age about 39 years, AssistantTeacher R/o Village - Bhaisbod, P.O. - Ambari, Kurud, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) Praveen Chandra Sahu S/o Shri Siyaram Sahu, Age about 37 years, AssistantTeacher R/oViHage & P.O. - Champajhar, Via — Navapara, Distt.— Raipur (C.G.) Dhani Ram Baya S/o Shri Shivcharan Baya, Age about 37 years, AssistantTeacher Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Champajhar, Abhanpur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) PETITIONERS G’< (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 4é H2007 @ (3) 7 Heera Ram Sahu S/o Shri Ukel Ram Sahu, Age about 45 years, AssistantTeacher R/o Village — Beldih, P.O. Bundeli, Via - Pitora Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) Tulendra KumarTiwari S/o Shri Amarnath Tiwari, Age about47 years, AssistantTeacher Govt. Primary School, Beldih PO. - Bundeli, Via - Pitora Dis‘ttkLRaipur (C.G.) 9, MeghnathYag‘avh S/o Shri Amarnath Tiwari, Age about 47 years, AssistantTeacher Govt. Primary School, Kurra P.O:- Bundeli, Via - Pitor Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) I NERSUS 1. State Government of Chhattisgarh Through :- Secretary, Tribal & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. AssistaatCommissioner , ,. RESPONDENTS Tribal Welfare Department, ;Raipur(C.G.) 3. District Education Officer ,» t t' Raipur (D.G.) 4. Block Education Officer Abhanpur, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioners most humbly submit as under :- 1. Particulars of the Petitioner :- As mentioned in cause title. a HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'I56ARH AT BILASPUR y. P. (S) No 402 of 2007 Pemioners : Chhannu Lal sahu and o'thzrs Versus Responden‘ts ' : 5mm of Chhaffisgurh and oihers $8: Hon'ble Mr. Jus+icz Sufish K. Agniho‘rri, J Mr. Ajay Shr'wastava, Advocn're for the pdi'tioners. Mr. Sushi! Dubzy, Gov¢mmem Advocafc for the respondeMs/Sfan. O R D E R (Pcssed on 23” day of January, 2007) The following order of The Court is pamd by So‘l’ish K. Agnihoh'i. J. 1. Lear-nod counsel appearing for ‘rhe pefi'tioners as well as teamed Govemmen'r Advoco‘re appaaring for 'fha respondents/Sm joimly T submitdfhaT 1h¢ facts of 'rhe presgnf case are similar +0 tho? of in W. P. (s) 5976' of 2006 (Sud1il Tiwori & o‘l'hers Vs. Sfa‘le 60W. of cmmisgarh a mm), Mach was allowed via; order dmd 7*“ a; W ‘ November, 2006. They furiher submit ‘rha't the quesfion of law involved is also fhe some. l .\, v‘ 2. In vizw of the above s'rafed albmissions made by learned counsel for the parties, fhe wri'r pe'l'ifion is allowed in ferms of 'lhe order dated - 1 l 7*“ November, 2006 passed by ans court in w. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order as 1'0 costs. Sd/- . Satish K. Agnihotri ‘l Judge Bablu i