IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2011 / 15TH POUSHA 1932 OP (RC).No. 30 of 2011(O) ------------------------------ RCP.41/2010 of PRL.M.C.,ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER -------------- T.J.THOMAS, S/O.VARKEY JOSEPH, CIA, CHAKOLAS HABITAT, WILLINGDON ENCLAVE, THEVARA FERRY ROAD, ERNAKULAM-682 013. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER SRI.P.P.RAMACHANDRAN SMT.RUKHIYABI MOHD KUNHI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. CAPTAIN MANOHAR NAMBIAR, S/O.C.M.NAMBIAR, INDIAN NAVAL ACADEMY, EZHIMALA NAVAL ACADEMY, EZHIMALA NAVARL ACADEMY PO KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 310. 2. PRADITA NAMBIAR, W/O.CAPTAIN MANOHAR NAMBIAR, INDIAN NAVAL ACADEMY, EZHIMALA NAVAL ACADEMY, EZHIMALA NAVARL ACADEMY PO, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 310. THIS OP (RENT CONTROL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & N. K. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ O. P. (RC) No.30 of 2011 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 5th day of January, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J Under challenge in this Original Petition filed by the tenant under Article 227 of the Constitution is Ext.P7 order passed by the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam in execution of an order of eviction passed by the Rent Control Court, Ernakulam. Even though very attractive grounds have been raised in the O.P., we are not considering their merits. We notice that even if the petitioner has a genuine grievance about Ext.P7, the statute provides remedy to him under Section 14 of Act 2 of 1965. We decline jurisdiction and dismiss the O.P. This judgment will not stand in the way of the petitioner invoking the statutory remedies. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE N. K. BALAKRISHNAN JUDGE kns/- -2-