IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12293 of 2009 RAMESHWAR THAKUR & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 15-04-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners , who are family members of the husband, are apprehending their arrest in complaint case under section 498A and other provisions of the Penal Code and section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They were granted anticipatory bail on 21.07.2006. It is submitted that subsequently matrimonial harmony stood restored and the parties are living as husband and wife even today. The complaint is one who sworn affidavit in the present application. Since matrimonial harmony stood restored, the petitioners, were under impression that the issue stood resolved and nothing was required to be done further. Only for the reason that the allegations arise in a matrimonial dispute, matrimonial harmony has been restored, and the complainant is residing in the matrimonial home, let the petitioners, namely, Rameshwar Thakur, Parmila Devi and Rinku Kumar, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks when they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10, 000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in Complaint Case no. 2695 of 2004, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. BTiwary/ ( Navin Sinha, J )