IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2009 / 28TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 29242 of 2009(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.GANESHAN,S/O.KRISHNAN, PART-TIME SWEEPER,OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR,LAND ACQUISITION (RAILWAY),TALUK OFFICE,KASARAGOD. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN SRI.R.REJI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE,CIVIL STATION, KASARAGOD. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF LAND REVENUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, LAND REVENUE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND ACQUISITION (RAILWAY),TALUK OFFICE, KASARAGOD,SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 6. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 29242 OF 2009 (A) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a Part Time Sweeper working in the office of the 5th respondent. The prayer made by him is for regularization. The proposal made in this behalf was rejected as per Ext.P4 order passed by the first respondent on 2.2.2008. 2. However, having regard to the fact that this court has decided similar issue in favour of employees like the petitioner by ExtP7 judgment in WP(c).No.10774/08, the view taken in Ext.P4 cannot be sustained. In view of the above, it is directed that the 2nd respondent shall take up and consider Ext.P5 representation in the light of Ext.P7 judgment referred to above and make necessary proposal to the first respondent who shall pass necessary orders consistent with Ext.P7 judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent along with a copy of this writ petition for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC /09 :2 :