IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.19267 of 2010 Smt.Shakuntla Devi Vs. State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.Ram Pal Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. After having made a reference to number of incidents, the petitioner ultimately has challenged the order of her transfer. If the petitioner was indeed harassed, it will be good for her that she does not stay at that place. If the allegations of harassment and abuse are really made out, the petitioner would be at liberty to file a private complaint, which is an appropriate remedy. Otherwise, the petitioner may represent to Secretary, Education, who will look into the allegations made by the petitioner against her harassment as well as for non-payment of salary. If the representation is filed, the same shall be attended to and disposed of by the Secretary by passing a speaking order even on the allegations made against respondent No.5. The transfer otherwise being an incidence of service, would not call for any interference. Subject to above observations, the writ petition is dismissed. October 27, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE