IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.83 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1821 OF 2003 Mr.Abbas J. Thaver ... Petitioner (Orig.Petitioner) V/s 1 The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Others ... Respondents (Orig.Respondents) Mr. V.J. Hegde for petitioner Ms.Shobha Ajithkumar for respondents Coram : A.S. Aguiar, J. Date : 25th February,2005. P.C. . Learned advocate for respondent No.1 states that BMC has filed their reply to the contempt petition pointing out that notices issued under section 53(1) of M.R.T.P.Act could not be pursued due to certain administrative difficulties like election duties and absence of Assistant Engineer. Respondent No.1 has also taken steps under section 53(7) of M.R.T.P.Act for prosecution of respondents No.2,3,4 and 5. Since there is some delay in implementing the order of this court dated 17/06/2004, the respondent No.1 tenders unconditional apology to the court. It is pointed out 2 that non-implementation of order of this court dated 17/06/2004 within the stipulated period is not deliberate and intentional.In view of the unconditional apology tendered by the Respondent. The same is accepted and accordingly contempt petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. ( A.S. Aguiar, J.)