IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3115 of 2006 In First Appeal No.265 of 1982 ====================================================== Maya Devi & Ors .... .... Petitioners. Versus Soneful Devi @ Phullia Devi & Anr. .... .... Opposite Parties. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ------------ 19 13-03-2015 Perused the office notes. The present application bearing M.J.C. No.3115 of 2006 has been listed before this Court in the light of the report dated 18.02.2015 of the Registrar General for seeking further specific direction in the matter. It appears that vide order dated 16.12.2009 passed in this M.J.C. application, the Registry was directed to institute a case against the opposite parties of this case, i.e., the appellants of First Appeal No.265 of 1982 under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for producing a forged document in the Court with further direction that the First Appeal No.265 of 1982 may be listed under the appropriate heading before the appropriate Bench along with the records of this case. However, this M.J.C. Patna High Court MJC No.3115 of 2006 (19) dt.13-03-2015 2/3 application was disposed of. Thereafter, opposite party no.2, Shanti Devi, filed M.J.C. No.2980 of 2010 for recalling/review of the order dated 16.12.2009 passed in this M.J.C. No.3115 of 2006, which was dismissed vide order dated 04.08.2010. Opposite party no.2, Shanti Devi, thereafter, filed L.P.A. No.1608 of 2010, which was disposed of on 15.07.2011 with a direction to the appellant to file review before the learned Single Judge. Thereafter, opposite party no.2, Shanti Devi, filed Civil Review No.298 of 2011 to review the order dated 04.08.2010 passed in M.J.C. No.2980 of 2010 and also the order dated 16.12.2009 passed in this M.J.C. No.3115 of 2006, which was disposed of on 17.01.2014 with the modification in the order dated 16.12.2009 passed in this M.J.C. No.3115 of 2006 to the extent that the Registry, before instituting the case under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as directed, shall examine as to who was prima facie instrumental in filing of the said alleged forged compromise petition in the First Appeal. The report dated 18.02.2015 of the Registrar General shows that in the light of the aforesaid order dated 16.12.2009 passed in this M.J.C. application, Complaint Case No.988C of 2010 was filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, on 16.04.2010, which is pending in the court of Sub-Divisional Patna High Court MJC No.3115 of 2006 (19) dt.13-03-2015 3/3 Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in which summons have been issued on 18th of March, 2011. Since in the light of the order dated 16.12.2009 passed in this M.J.C. application, Complaint Case No.988C of 2010 was filed in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, on 16.07.2010 before passing the order dated 17.01.2014 in Civil Review No.298 of 2011 by which the order dated 16.12.2009 passed in this M.J.C. No.3115 of 2006 was modified as indicated above, no further direction is required to be issued to the Registry of this Court. If any parties are aggrieved, they may take their defence in the complaint case. P.S./- (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) U