-HC-22 ^' 311^1 ^ST h-H'h Sf^f ^irr^ ^^ *^*"'" TS? •-llHldl, ^•dl'M'lio. f^Wiyy 3TT^9T x(^g? ..(^.£:C.gl..AJ&_& °>d>o /o g "V% 200 HWWI worai ^t^St' 311^1 TOnwflftg PBTITIONBR Vet'sus RE8PONDENTS 1. D.K. singt|, S/'o shri Shripal Smgh, aged a'pout 50 years, IpreseD.tly working as Sub Dwisional Officer, I^ural Eagineering Services, Sub- Divisioit R^jpur, Distfc Ambikapur (CG) olt' State Pancha', Departntent, 2. Saajay Enginee] Distt, K< 3. SIu-i Engmee Rules, Distt. K< WRIT PETITION U'TOBR ARl Ktoial SB: HON. SHRI DHIRBHDRA^MISHRA^J 15-13-ao08 yan N.K. vyas, Adv. tor Sushri Sunita Jain, Paa^l Grievance of fhe Assistant Eiigineer in the Enguieermg Seryices, JTUUOF to ttie petitioner and Assistant Engineer on 20-7-2QC additional charge of Execuuve conttnuuig as Asstetaut ii;nguie( petitio^ier ottice Ambikariur, 2007 chi<lfcl41-1 t|W<-if 4 fe^ <1"1«$1< iT3lf;OT3II^T Chhattisgarh through Secretaiy, ^at and Rural Engiaeermg D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Sharma, Inchai^e Executive Pioject No. 2, PMGSY, Korba, ^rba SCG) SIiai'ma, Iitcliai'ge Executive t~, Kondagaon, Pauchayat Avaiu [Engmeermg Services, Kondagaon, K<|>ndagaon (CGj R ARfICLB 326 OF THB COMSTITIJTIOS •F INDiA ttie petitioner. Lawyer, for fhe State, is that he is preseat^' posted as of Sub Dndsioiial Officer, RiLral ur. Respondents no. 2 aad 3 who are who were proinoted to the post of and 16-10-2007 have been given ingineer, whereas the petitioner is stiU ;r. . - ; ^ -ii®y<a<\ ""'T^ O*"'1'!'. tl-HC-22 ;1;^/ 311^1^1 W snt^i ^i-i ^rf^l ^sg •<<I'I||<'PI, ^Tflyns. f6i<ii<iy SIT^T '^SR ..c^.. <nwn «i*4ich '/^^_^^6/o3 "WI, 200 f^^T' sn^iwiiwnfei ^f- slage Leamed counsel for thej pressiag this petidon at this the petitioner to file Iresh reprei raising his grievance along w| respondent No. l may be dire| accordance wifh law. Leamed counsel for fhe makes a fresh representation| respondeut No. 1, the same period of8 weeks fl»mthe date In view of fhe subuussio) parties, fhis petition is dispose|d make representation raising his| 1 along wifh a copy of fhis <j representation being uiade, the ^s by the respondeut No. 1 within receipt offhe repicsentation on siialu cbl^I<v<^1T1 Wt^f'^ fst<l <^l^l< iTsiPtnaii^r petitioners subnuts that he is not ;, hcwever, he prays for liberiy to ientation before the respondeut No, 1 Ifh a copy of ttus order and the 3ted to decide his representation in State subiaits fhat if the petitioner detailmg tds grievaace before the U be consKlered and decided withia a rf receipt of the representation. as inade by learued counsel for the of with liberty to the petitioner to grievaaces before the respoudent No. 'rder within 15 days, and on such iameshaU be considered and decided a period of 8 weeks fix>m the date of ts owu merit in accordaace wifb. law. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra ~ Judge !lr= [•q^^f^r