1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Writ Petition No.3353 of 2008 [Ku. Sanal Talat Naseen Khan Vs. Mah. State Board of Second. & Higher Secondary Edn. & another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. A.D. Mohgaonkar, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. P.B. Patil, Adv., for respondent no.2. ----- CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE AND A.H. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 13th October,2008. Heard Mr. A.D. Mohagaonkar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Patil, learned Counsel for respondent no.2, appears and has placed before us the original record. We have perused the Enquiry Report and also the copying material which was confiscated by the Flying Squad. Undoubtedly, the copying material was picked up from beneath the desk where the petitioner was sitting to write her examination paper, and more particularly the Maths papers. Though the Enquiry Report states that the officer did not see her copying from the 2 material that was picked up by the Flying Squad, the Examiner's report dated 21st April, 2008 does indicate that the copying material was used by the petitioner, and more particularly printed pages of the guide - ”Algebra Study – Tarraki - e – Talim” page 108. On the face of this record, we do not find any case made out to cause interference in the impugned order issued by the Board. Hence, Writ Petition is rejected summarily. Judge Judge |Hedau|