%‘4 HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTESGARH, BILASPEJR W.P:(S) No. .5361 of 2007 1’ETITEOHERS 1 Baldau Ram Sahu S]o Shu’ Govind Singh Sahu, Age about 49 years, L€cturer, S.C.E.R‘T., Raipur, H-7, B.T.L Colony, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Keshaw Rain Chaturvedani S/o Late Shm' Ni‘xkanth Chaturwedani, Age about 52 years, Pn'ncipal, G.G.H.S. School, Majldir Hasaud, Distt. Raipur (C.G.} Bhushan Kumar Sahu Sio Shri Miiap Singh Sahu, Age about ‘51 ysars, Head Master, G.H.S. School, Chikhah', Dondi, Durg, Distt. Durg {c.G.) MrS, Archalla Satish Doshpande W/ o Dr. SatiSh Deshpande, Ago about 46 Vears, Lacturar, M.L.B. Govt. Girls HS. School, Jashpulnagar (C. G.) O). Versus RES?0NDENT§ 1 Stato Govt. of Chhattisgayh, Through: Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Ofticer, Raipur/ Burg] Jashpunlagar (C. G.) (Writ Petition under Article 2260f the Conetitution of India) Apyeaxanee: Slni Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioners. 8111i Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State‘on advance copy. emu. omER {17.39.2097} SUEIL KUMAR SEEM-IA, J“ Heard on admission. Learned counsel for the petixioners submits that The petitioners have passed B.Ed. examination on their own expenses, therefore, they are entitled to receive two advance increments according to circulars elated 24.12.19§8 and G1.03.1999. He also submits that in many identical matters, the petitions have been allowed in terms of the order passed in $§ 2 W.P.(S) No. 5361 of 2007 the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharudwagi Vs. Municiml Cwparatian; Burg and anather {2006 (El? MPJR-CG 961. He submits That the caSe of the petitioners is square1y covered by tho said Jud gmant. This legal position is not (lisputed by the leaned counsel fof me State, However, he submits that the order may be passed in terms of the said judgment, but it shall be subjected to verification regardiiig petitioners’ such qualification. i. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in case of Yashwani Kumar Bhamdwaj Vs Municipai Comomtion: Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of the facts as to whether the petitioners had acquired B.Ed. Examination Certificates on their own expenses as per circulars dated 24121998 and 01.03.1999 and further Whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. costs. The petition stands finally disposed of. NO order as to l Sd/- l Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge l