F '•'''"'''"°""" .^-^^s^ ,,.^ss^:::::( datso-- r?^3'^t WLE QE^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER W. P. LS). N_o, <^^^ /2Q09 Dhaneshwar Prasad Kashyap, S/o. Late Shri Ramadhar Kashyap, aged about 19 years, near Millan Kirana Stores, Link Road, Chandwa Bhantha, Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS :1) State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Agriculture (Engineering) DKS Bhavan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 1< -.. . :2) ' Additional Director, Agriculture (Engineering), Directorate Agriculture (Engineering), Raipur, ,/ District Raipur (C.G.) :3) Agriculture (Engineer) Bilaspur office at Nutan Chowk, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/WRITS, ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS ete, HiQH COUR'T CF CHHATTISGARH . BiLASPUR ' w. ^i i r'j...: s i -se^.'s^ \^ s 's, 'iitu'.^.''-'*"^ •<u*;" —'i-va ; ^L : 1 3 iUi'^^.K unsnssuws?' i fsssc; y\2snv3D VsfSUS ^si.^^UNLJ^N s otsxs ot ^nns'iXjSsam s^ uin^i's . ^ s^ i y^^ '"•^ s^^^^s'v f\ t*i ? i'u<^, ^-j /^^* ^'^ r.^" ./^il ^^ T f<^ua -fT^^' T^'*^ ^< 1? f\ -vf. y-.^.t^^l ^·^~^ ^r^ 'yT» -^.? ? ^^ ^F'-i T ^»t J, (VVF^I p^isisQH ursosr ArsiCis -1.^0 GT ins ^onStiiuiion o'i iHQia^ ^IHQIs £;SHGH . a~OH'OiS iiSHH OSIilSH ~i\. M^HinOIH- iJ. ! .! S^T'S;3i ^. ." 00!; i^.>''... OHStaTi:S. G'C'Uii'a.^^a iQ? I.J5*/ Jl./SU^iOjiSiE. OH'i T.B.2- i ilslKU;, UV. ACVOCfflXs ^SHSi'al TOf lils Qi.a's.'S- r~!!??'p<?r^' 'c'^&'s \ '••^r\a^f'i^.'{'\ :i'^^'\s~\.^.j 'P^^s^d Q'f- this 13" dsv of Novsmbiaf- ^009^ witn zns con33E"i OT i©3mscicounssi apossfin^ 'ror I.HS£ psnjss, t^s' peiiiion is nesra ?inativ. s PiS CS3S OT IHS pS'u'CIOIISr IS CH£itiiS TSZHsf OT '^HS pcUXIOH^r VvC'FKiHQ ss 'i son i: ( xns onies OT r3SpGHci£rii. 3 ^o.-^ A^ncUiiUrs (t.n^^tSSD, SiiaSpUa. QiSO OH n4-^.''i^^^ aH HSmSSSi. 1 i1£ pSXItlOHSF Dc^Hy miHOf i,s. riiiiS vssrs, s( xnsi ?OiHi OT liHis, CQUiO H-C^ HISKS sn spoucs'ison TOf SppOiHimSHI OH COmpSSSlGHalS D33i3. iiov;/s'V3f, rr'i's pSuiionsf. cn aZxsiHiHCi (HS sos OT iTiSiorirvi mcQs aFs sDDiiCffiuon on ,F~'i"i-^.'ij'uc> ror compassionss.s appoinirrient on ine grcuna inai sns peis'Ei&ner nss -no sourcss OT incoHiS sno Th33uCiai COHORIOH OT nis Tsniuv i£ psinsiic. ; n@ appH-csooEi 'i^so c'y i.ns ps'i.ixionsr HffiS pssn iSjscisO oy.tns rssponaent-ausnorities on ins srouna inai ine pstiaonsr nas not niso's uis sppl^Cation ic'f Qi'^nt ot compsssiOHffGs sppCjHu'TisiTt WiiniH IFss 3'^^DUsSiSCi pSiiOCE 3HO iH©ssnns nas DSSH coaTimuHiCffiiSa GO uis psiiisOHSf sy isiisr cssisa lu-^i-^uui^. a nus, xrus pSBiion. LSsmsG counss.j sppsann^ Td' 'ius pSTiTiOHss SUOHiiIS IH3I XHS p©x^iOHSa'cousO no"e HISKS sn sppiicaiion ?OT gfsn's o? compsssionsis cpDOlHIHssfiZ SSn^Sf £S f3©W3S ITiiHGf SHCt OH SXI^IHiuM iH©3QS OT msjQHiy. ns iTiSGc an £pp!icsi!on T'OF sppohiii'TiSHi on .cofnosssionsts DSSIS. s H€r£sS no. ozr;sr sourcs QT iHconi®in 's-ns TsiniiV OT'uiS osxiiiGHs;. itsving nsSiCi assmsc counssi IG: s.ns psxii;c'nsi, psrussci PIS£Q!HQ£ snd ins CiOcu^Ti@ni3 sopsncisu 'tKcfsio, it is sviOcni, tiiSi ttis circLusr ^3£'l^u ^-^.-^•^•J'^ Vv^H iS^eSi^ tsj COHipaisSiiJiica;.^ SppuiniLfT^fU ^aS -2-- CC'HSIOSFSQ £HQ SOOfOVcC; OST ZHi3 v/OU^'Z in S CSl'SHS OT CSCISiQHS. U;^U3S ^ ^; O QT in$ CuGUJ3]" O^^SQ Z'-u~A..UUS' V^fV SD^CITIC^HV^ pF'OVIOSS t.n^t %T';Ci57-^T f^^T^KT ^T} r'-ffcHi^n S? 1 c; -3'=7 ^'^' 73 '^-•^^^1 ^G'" ic^lcp -<-; i~ -hi? a;i ^-i-! ; 1 c*1 yv^i'? s'-t^^-i i v'n ? ^a?>-i| ^ ^^•iU *?1iwi W H-?T^|'T; y<T1^ ^i^QG'n •-i'^ ] Q^|^ ^I'1:U T~;nl ^.<n ; i nus, ins Qrouna GT rsiscuQH QOSS nci sssr^t 10 os luSQs; or improper. ss IHSI s3 i;. ?nsy, si is wsii Sciiisa pnncsp!©o': isw inaii cooo^ni^sn'ii on comossSiOnsts Qfound 13 not s mstnocl of rsGruitiTiisnt, but ;3 s TSCIiiIV 10 DFOVIO'S TC" ;r:lETi3G;i2IS rcH£Oiil£SUOH OT tHS TSH^HV ;" f^.^Tf^'pi,^ 'STsF i~?s;i?^ivin.n t^^ ri-2.:-~i;an^is?^? ? ?Tii1V r/tA;'"rt'i^—?<S r-.t 'r.?^iS •Th^<uth£ ^^^ iV'i i^Ea^Vila^ug ^fE^; ^rt^^^i^^i^^a^ a^tili^'y ^ i2.1^f i ^»J^i^ ^^ ^:j3?S? ascsassa snipiovss TFOH^ dssiitution. IH oi.^sr WOKSS, tns ois^scs OT OOtilpSSSIGHSIS sppOiHim^HI 13 10 ^HSDlc psHUfiOUS TaTHiiy tG iiQv ovsr ins suQasn siii^ncjsi cnsss sno 13 not 10 provicss ernoioymenE. In Haryana State Eiec&iCitv sOat-d and another vs. Haniin Singh' the Supreme' Coun .held tnat "ihe whoSe object of anv COHip3S3!QHSX£ £OPOIHIH"iSHT. SCHSiTISS s3 10 QiVS SUCCOF 10 THS TS:TsHV i0 i.sQS OV©E iHS SUOOSFE nns;';iC^3i c-fiSiS OiS's's^'Sa^ tHs aepenaenis on sccouni or me untimeiy aemise o? !ts soie esrning HisHIDSfS. |fi Sfafa Qf Ivl^niDljr VS. ^JId, R^I^Qdjn" th^ Suorenis Gouft. sftsr iiaVIHQ HS£fQ VSHOUS CcSSS OH CC'!T}CiS£3tOHd© SDOO^HimSH^, oossrvsQ ss uncisr. ; s. in -^mi. ^usnins s^ossin SHQ urs. UHiOH Os sHOsS SHu UFS. iii^^^S (a*) it was observsd that in al! oi' appoin?ment on compassionate arounds, there shouid nos D£ sny QSisy in 3ppOiH^i^"isnt. i ns purposs OT proviaiH^ sppoinxHisnis on soFripassionate around is to •rsltigate ths harciship ^ue to dQat^i o'r tii^ ^r@^d- .o^^&r 1?-; ?^@ '^milv. Such 30Dolntni9n1^ shoutd; thsrsfors, b£ provided immeaiaisiv 10 i'eaeem ine ?s?n.iv .n distress. The fsct ihat the wara was a yysiy-s-i^y •s's- •^'•'•^f^ t;tyi<Si ^'.^ "i-a-^)'''}••; ^t a'~>i!C- •t^t'^di.1' ^•s t;;;;''V; t5i ii ;S; '.iEi.ai^ ;j'i US-ay s %/; s ;;^ ;'£Ei2StSs S' -; 3*1 t «^>^l^I. ^.'J^rf^ C^-^l, S^ .r1 Wl,/S l'*T^» ^r. ^; HO QFOUHQ, UH<S3S IH@ SCH'SH^S jiS-SIT wtCiitsiw O O'l^'-u' 00 l^ ,W1 ^ V ^-r^^-u 1^ AIR 2003 SCvV 4339 -5- envisage specmcaily otherwise, to state that as and when such minor becomes a majorhecan be appointed without any time eonscipusnsss or limit: The above view was reiterated in Phooiwati (Smt.) v. Union of Jndia and org. (1991 Supp (2) SCC 689) and Union of tndia and ors. v. Bhagwaff S'ngh (1995 (G) SCC 476). Sn : Director of Education (Secondary) anct Anr. y. Pushpendra Kumar and QrsiQ^998 (5) SCC 192) it was : observed: -i thaf in matter of compassionate appointment there cannot be msistence for a particuiar post. Out of purely humanjtarian consideration and having regard to the fact that uniess som® 'souree of iivelihobd is Drovided the familv would not be able to make both ends meet, provisions are made for givin< apppintmenito <?(ie bfths dependanis of the deceased who may be eiigibte for appointment. Care has, however. to be taken that proyjsion for ground of compassiohate employment v.'hich is in the naturs of an exception to the gsneral proyisions does not unduly interfere with the right Qfthose.other persons who are ellgibls for appointment to sesk appoinfment agajnst the post 'A'hich wouid have beeh availabie, but for the provision enabiin§: appointment bsing madson compassibnate grounds of the dependant of the deceased empfoyee. As it js in the nature of expeption to the generai provisions it cannot substiiute the provision to which it is an exception and thereby nuiiify the main provision by taking away completely the conferredby the main provision." right 8. The Supreme Court in State of J & K and others Mir , in para 11 has heid as under: "11.......it isthat such an appointment is an sxception to the gsnerai ru!e. Normaiiy, an empSoymenf jn the Government or other ^pubiic secitors should be open to all etigible candid&tes who can come forward io apply and eompiete with each other. it is in consonance wlth Arfcte 14 of the Constitution. Qn the basis of competitive merits, an-appointment shouid nof be departed from except where compeiiing 3.:20p6{5)SGC766 4- Gowri circurr.stances demand, such as, death of the sole bread winner, the Tamily sun/wed and the farr'ily sufferins because of the setback. Once it is proved that inspite of the death of ihe breadwinner. the familv survivecj and substantiai period fe over, there is no necesslty IQ say "goQdbye" to the normal ruie of appointment and to shoVi' favour to one at the cost of the interests of severat othsrs ignonng the mandate of Article 14 ofthe Constitution." Appiying well settied principie of law to ths facts of the case and the famiiy members ofthe deceased empioyee had sun/ived for more than 10 years, the reasons for compassionats appointmsnt is to tide over the financiai probiem of the decsased empioyee, is not avallabte for appointment on compassionate basis. There is no merit in thls pefitjon. The petition is accordingiy dismissed. No orderastocosts. s»_<-, Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge