:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6617 OF 2007 Shri Kashinath Nandu Bhor ...Petitioner Versus Hon’ble Minister, Food and Civil Supply and Consumer Protection, Mantralaya, Mumbai & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.Sarang Aradhye Adv. for the petitioners. Mr.R.M.Patne, AGP for the respondents. Mr.Anil Pure-Nayab Tahsildar present. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 17th January, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. The order under challenge was passed on 21.4.2007. It directs re-advertisement after confirming the order :2: :2: :2: passed on 12.4.2006 by the Deputy Commissioner,(Supply), Nashik Division, Nashik. The fresh advertisement is already issued. Even otherwise, the order of the Minister requires no interference. Not only the petitioner but the respondent no.3 before the Minister are Non-Adivasis. The Advertisement was aimed at inviting Applications from educated, unemployed Adivasis and giving them priority while issuing licences for distribution of the essential commodity. In such circumstances, no case is made out for interference under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition dismissed. No order as to costs. ******