IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 3196 of 2011 Date of decision: 13.5.2011 Chief Administrator, HUDA, and another … Petitioners versus Nafe Singh and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. Raman Gaur, Advocate, for the petitioners ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner-HUDA is aggrieved with orders dated 18.11.2009 and 13.1.2010 passed in the execution petition filed by the respondent-decree-holder,Nafe Singh. The only contention raised is that there is confusion in the orders passed. It has been pointed out that in the order dated 18.11.2009, though plot is allotted in terms of the policy but there is no direction as to for which year the rate is to be paid by the decree-holder. The decree-holder filed an application for allotment in the year 2002 but the Court has misconstrued that the decree-holder is entitled for allotment of the plot as per the rate prescribed in the year 2000 instead of year 2002. It has also been pointed out that though it was apprised to the executing Court that in the year 2000, the rate at the rate of Rs.810/- per sqquare yard was meant for only 6 marla plot but for the 10 marla plot, the rate as Rs.2000/- per square uard; however, despite that, the decree-holder has been directed to deposit payment at the rate of Rs.900/- per square yard. No detailed reasons have been given to do so. In view of this position, the impugned orders are set aside C.R. No. 3196 of 2011 -2- and the case is remitted back to the executing Court to pass a consolidated order after hearing both the parties, purely on merits, in accordance with law without being influenced by any of the observations made hereinabove. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. May 13, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE