WW,W,W HIéH COURT OF CHHA‘ W1 A NO Defendant No . 2 FTISGARH AT BILASPUR 1.5m1‘. Jamna, W/o La‘re Sui Das, Clo 5on Singh‘ 5/0 Sukru, R/o Pulligaon, P.5. Parpa, Disfr‘ic‘r Bas‘rar (£18.) 2. Driver Sada Jha, S/o Made Jhcl, C/o Bhola Jhn, SIO Sadanand Jha, Bela Bazar' Para, Jagda!pur (C122), Driver 3. Kamal Deo Jha, 5/0 Sadcmand Jha, Bela Bazar Para, Jagdalpur (C.6.) Owner Present Mr. Prashand Jaiswal, Sr. Adv. wifh Mr. Sankalp Jaiswal, Adv. for The appeilan‘r. "espondenf N02 & 3. Mr. Prafuii Bharaf, Advcoai'e for O R A L Jl $assed on The appeiianf-I nsurer has award dafed 30.10.2003 passe I D G M E N T 20/04/2007) preferred This appeal againsf The cl by The 2m Addifional Mofor M P.T.O. Wm ..................... W 200 mum-(13W) WEHW WW§WW WWW mmyf%am aamm ’16 OF 2004 Orien‘l‘al Insurance Company L’fd., Jagdalpur, fhr‘ough Divisiona! Office, Bilaspur (Ga) APPELLANT Defenda‘nf No.3 Vs REsPONDENTS Ciaim an? Defendant Na.1 ‘XLHC—78 mah‘rm ammwm mmwf%am mméffaé’rw ézwm Roshanf— Acciden'r Claims Tribunal, Btls‘rur m‘ Jagdalpur in Claim Case nsaTion 0f Rs.80,000/— has been 1denT No.1 Towards The deaTh of her *i Samriddhi. appellanT-insurance company is ThaT an, The age of deceased has noT been n excessive compensaTion has been From perusal of The rec z deaTh of her 11 years old daughTer. No.192/2002 whereby compe awarded +0 fhe claiman‘r/r‘espo 11 year's daugh‘l‘er‘ namely Kumat The ground laken by The while assessing The compensa‘rii Taken in'ro considerafion and t awarded To +l1e claiman‘l for flu ord of The Tribunal iT is found Tha'l The appellanT has noT Taken permission under Secfion 170 of The MoTor Vehicles ACT, 1988 To co Therefore, iT is noT open To The award on The ground ThaT The s in The lighT of The facT 170 of The MoTor Vehicles ACT by The Tribunal To conTesT The subsTance liable To be dismissed and accordingly, iT is hereby dismissed wiTh cosT. Sdl— .Dhirendra Mishm nTesT The claim on oTher grounds and appellanT To challenge The impugned lme IS eXCeSSIVe. , ThaT no permission under SecTion , 1988 was granTed To The appellanT claim, The appeal being devoid of s, is i Judge P.T.O.