IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.605 of 2010 KAUSHAL SINGH Versus RAJENDRA PRASAD & ORS. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Kavi Bhushan Singh, Advocate 2 09.07.2010 Office has raised objection in view of the fact that by the impugned judgment and decree, the trial court has decreed the suit for eviction of the tenant and also for realization of rent. Thus, in that case second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure would be maintainable. Learned counsel submits that apart from the fact that this being a composite suit for eviction under the ground of bonafide personal necessity as well as realization of rent. This is also a fact that the suit has not been decided following the summarily proceeding as specified in Section 14 of the Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982, as the plaintiff also sought decree with regard to arrears of rent and the suit has been decreed on both grounds. In that view of the matter learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to convert this 2 civil revision into the second appeal. Permission is accorded. Let the petitioner convert this civil revision into a second appeal within two weeks, failing which it shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)