IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 6945 of 1994 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- PATEL BECHARBHAI SENDHIDAS Versus PATEL KASHIRAM VIRCHANDDAS -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 6945 of 1994 MR TUSHAR MEHTA for Petitioner No. 1-2 DS AFF.NOT FILED (R) for Respondent No. 1-17,22 GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 18-21 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL Date of decision: 28/10/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.Tushar Mehta, learned Counsel for the petitioners, states that the present petition was against the order passed in the suit proceedings in connection with the election of the Market Committee, Unza in the year 1994. The period of that market committee is over and thereafter subsequent elections are also held. 2. In view of the aforesaid, no useful purpose would be served in deciding the question since the petition has become infurctuous by efflux of time. Therefore, the petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. No costs. 28-10-2002 (Jayant Patel, J.) vinod