1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1481 OF 2010 (Ganesh Dashrath Muley vs. Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Buldana & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. SEPTEMBER 07, 2010. Mrs. Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sambre, learned counsel for respondent No. 1. In view of the subsequent events pointed out by Mrs. Joshi, learned counsel, it is not necessary to consider the controversy involved, on merits. She has stated that Respondent No. 2 has given a letter to Respondent No. 1 communicating her non inclination for promotion. She states that copy of said letter is available with her. Shri Sambre, learned counsel accepts that Respondent No. 2 has given such a letter. In view of this letter, it is apparent that dispute inter-se between the petitioner and Respondent No. 2 does not servive. Respondent No. 1 has to promote suitable employee in accordance with law as Assistant Accountant. Respondent No.1, therefore, to take decision as early as possible and in any case by 31st December 2010. It is made clear that impugned order dated 2 26.10.2009 shall not come in the way of Respondent No. 1 while undertaking that exercise. With this direction and clarification, present writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.