FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.9295 OF 2007 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Mr.V.B.Rajure for the petitioners. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 7TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED: 7TH FEBRUARY, 2008 DATED: 7TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. This writ petition impugns an order dated 10.7.2007 passed by the trial Court rejecting the application of the petitioners under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure for adding them as party defendants in Regular Civil Suit No.109/2000. I perused the order and more particularly paragraph 5 thereof. Apart from the merits learned Judge has also observed in paragraph 5 that the trial has reached the final stage and only defendant was to adduce the evidence. This order was passed on 10th July, 2007. Mr.Rajure, learned counsel for the petitioners is not in a position to state whether the suit is still pending or disposed of. Keeping that in view and considering the reasons stated in the order no interference in the instant writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is called for. It is always open for the petitioners to adopt such other remedy as may be available in law. With these observations the writ petition is dismissed. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)