HIGH <X>URT OF CHHATTI8GARH : BILA8PUR WritPetition (S) No. 2215 of 2009 Petitioner Srut. Bindu Gautam @ Sarita Gautani, W/o Sfari Suresh Gautatn, aged about 27 years, R/o Village Saraipatera, Tahsil _ Pandariya, Distnct - Kabirdham (C.G.) Versus c: Respoudeuts 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. State of Cfahatdsgarh, through Secretary, Departiaent of Paachayat & Social Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Maatralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Directorate of Panchayat, Chliatisgarh, D.K.S, Bhawan, Maatralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Kabitxiham, District Kabirdham (C.G.) The Project Officer, Women & Child Development Departnieat Pandariya, District Kabirdham (C.G.) ; Sint. Rekha Chaiihaa, W/o Shri Manohar Chauhan, R/o VIUage Saraipatera, Tahsil Paadariya, DistrictKabudham.(C.G.) (Writ Petition UnderArticle 226/2270ffhe Constitutionoflndia) (SB: Honlle Shri Satish K. Agniliotri J.) Shri Vivek Shanna, Advocate for fhe pctitioner. Shri Yashwant Sin.gh Thakur, Depuly Advocate General wifh Shri Amnd Dubey, Paael Lawyer for the respondents No. 1 to 4. ORDBR (Passed on this 29(h day ofApril, 2009) 1. Learaed counsel appearing for the petitiouer.on iastructions, submits that the petitioner does not waat to contest this petition ou merits, at this stage and prays forwithdiawal ofthis petition with Uberty to pursue the pendiag representation dated - 4.4.2009 (Annexure P/2). It is further submitted fhat fhe respoDjdents may be directed to consider and decide the pending representation, m. accordance with law, on its bwn m.ents, withili stipulated penod. i-ii. ^ e 2. Leamedcounselappearit^fortherespondents/Statesubiiuts that fhe above-stated pendii^ representation shaB be cousidered ajid decided, ia accordance wlth law by fhe concenied authority,witluu a peried of three weeks fioin tbe date ofreceipt ofacopy offhis ordcr. 3. hi view of the foregoing, fhe petition is disnussed as wifhdrawn wifh fhe above-stated liberty. Satish K. Agnihotrii llialmr , ;, . ] JudgC ^