IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH OCTOBER 2011 / 27TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 28499 of 2004(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JOHNSON GOMAZ, T.C.1/65, `B' PLAMOODU JUNCTION, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN SRI.M.R.SASITH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. GENERAL MANAGER, DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE MANAGER, INDIAN BANK, NALANCHIRA BRANCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, OFFICE OF THE TAHASILDAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.V.JOSHI,SC FOR KHADI BOARD. R3 BY ADV. SRI.S.EASWARAN BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MR. SHIBU JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 28499 of 2004(P) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF PERMANENT REGISTRATION ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF THE KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD TO THEMANAGER INDIAN BANK, NALANCHIRA BRACNH'. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF THE PETITIONER TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT DTD. 12.02.1998. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF THE PETITIONER TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT DTD. 04.11.1999 EXT.P5 : TRUE COPIES OF THE COMMUNICATIONS AND ADMIT CARD EVIDENCING THE TREATMENT OF THE PETITIONER SINCE 2001 EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P(C) No.28499 OF 2004 ......................................................................... Dated this the 19th October , 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is challenging the revenue recovery proceedings initiated at the instance of the third respondent- Bank. 2. When the matter is taken up for final hearing, the learned Counsel for the respondent Bank submits, on instruction, that the defaulter, during the pendency of the proceedings, have already satisfied the outstanding liability and the account has already been closed. In the said circumstance, the above submission is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of holding that no further proceedings shall be pursued against the petitioner in respect of the cause of action projected. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk