IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD W.P.No.10902 of 1997 Dt.24-09-2007 Between: M.Krishna ..Petitioner and 1. The C.I. of Police, P.S. Kukatpally, Rangareddy Dist. and others. ..Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY W.P.No.10902 of 1997 Order: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) This writ petition is taken on file basing on the Fax message sent by the petitioner to the Hon’ble the Chief Justice alleging that in spite of his obtaining status quo order in I.A.No.242 of 1997 in O.S.No.64 of 1997 from the Principal District Munsif (West & South) Rangareddy District the Kukatpally police detained him illegally and tortured him by extending the support to S.V.S.V.Varma, and B.Ramachander who are defendants in the suit. In the process, he was illegally detained from 24-04-1997 to 28-04-1997 that too on getting information that a search warrant was getting ready in Additional Judicial First class Magistrate (West & South) R.R.District. When he was standing near the police station in the bus stop, the Advocate-Commissioner along with an official of the court went inside and came back and met him outside the police station and took his statement. The Inspector of Police, Kukatpally Police station filed a counter affidavit on behalf of respondents 1 to 4 denying the illegal detention of the petitioner; that the petitioner was summoned to the police station on 12-04-1997 for enquiry in connection with Cr.No.87 of 1997 filed under Sections 420, 468, 471 IPC registered against the petitioner on the compliant made by one Bhadra Reddy. During the course of investigation petitioner has filed xerox copies of the orders obtained by him and denied about threatening by the C.I. of police with dire consequences. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of sending telegram to the party, who has entrusted the brief, he has not turned up with necessary instructions. Since the petitioner obtained status quo order in O.S.No.64 of 1997, it is always open for him to obtain necessary orders from the Magistrate who issued search warrant. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. _______________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J. _________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY,J 24-09-2007 Murthy