:1: :1: :1: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3532 OF 2002. IN REVISION APPLICATION NO.253 OF 1997 . . . Maruti Gorivle. ..Applicant. Versus. Bhagoram Chengo Mohite & ors. ..Respondent. --- Mr.S.V.Marwadi, advocate for the applicant. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP for State. CORAM: V.M.KANADE,J CORAM: V.M.KANADE,J CORAM: V.M.KANADE,J DATE: MARCH 16, 2005. DATE: MARCH 16, 2005. DATE: MARCH 16, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. This is an application for restoration of the Criminal Revision Application. It was dismissed for want of prosecution on 26/11/1998. By the said order, the Criminal Revision Application was dismissed for non-removal of office objection. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that in fact all the objections had already been removed by the applicant. He therefore, submits that there was no question of removal of office objections. It was :2: :2: :2: submitted that thereafter, this fact was pointed out to this Hon’ble Court and the Criminal Revision Application was subsequently restored by order dated 22/12/1998. The applicant in paragraph-1 of his application has stated that all office objections were already removed. For the reasons recorded in paragraph-1 of the application, application for restoration is allowed. Accordingly, the Revision Application is restored to the file. Criminal Revision Application be placed before the appropriate court. (V.M.KANADE,J)