THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.32522 & 32527 of 2010 Dated 10th March, 2011 Between: K.Sivaji and another …Petitioners (W.P.No.32522 of 2010) And Sri Varaha Lakshmi Narasimha Swamyvari Devasthanam, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam, rep.by its Executive Officer, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam and another …Respondents (W.P.No.32522 of 2010) Counsel for the petitioners: Sri T.Lakshminarayana Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri V.Venugopala Rao The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: W.P.No.32522 of 2010 is filed for the following substantive relief: “...to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in interfering with the possession of the petitioners over their dry land of an extent of Acs.13.00 in Sy.No.275/F of Adivivaram Village, Visakhapatnam (Rural) Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, without following due process of law is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 1st respondent to issue necessary proceedings for regularisation as per the G.O.Ms.No.578 Revenue (Endowments IV) Department dated 19.08.2000 b receiving the rate per acre at Rs.54,000/-.” W.P.No.32527 of 2010 is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in interfering with the possession of the petitioners over their dry lands of an extent of Acs.15.00 cents in Sy.No.275/F of Adivivaram Village, Visakhapatnam (Rural) Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 1st respondent to issue necessary proceedings for regularisation as per the G.O.Ms.No.578 Revenue (Endowments IV) Department dated 19.08.2000 by receiving the rate per acre at Rs.54,000/-.” At the hearing, Sri T.Lakshminarayana, learned counsel for the petitioners, stated that after filing of these writ petitions, it has come to light that the lands, in respect of which the petitioners have sought for regularisation, do not belong to respondent No.1-Devasthanam and that as these writ petitions are filed on the incorrect premise that the lands belong to respondent No.1-Devasthanam, the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to them to approach the competent civil Court for appropriate relief. This request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petitions, W.P.M.P.Nos.41348, 41349, 41355 and 41356 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 10th March, 2011 VGB