IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2005 of 2007 AWADH BIHARI PRASAD SON OF LATE YUGAL KISHORE PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- GODWARI, NEARD BHAIRO ASTHAN, P.S. RAMPUR, DISTRICT- GAYA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI JITENDRA SHRIVASTAVA, THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA 3. SRI SAKALDEEP PD. SINGH, THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA ----------- 3 01.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Parthsarthy, learned Standing Counsel No. X appearing for the State. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the opposite parties have not carried out the order of this Court as contained in Annexure-1, whereby the opposite parties were directed to complete the departmental enquiry and also to make payment of salary for the period the petitioner had worked. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the State stating therein to the effect that the departmental enquiry was proceeded and completed inflicting minor punishment. As regards the salary, it has been stated that after verifying the records as directed by this Court a sum of Rs. 18,055/- was found admissible for payment which has been paid to the petitioner as stated in paragraph 5 of the show cause. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed reply to the show cause whereby it has been stated that the respondents have not properly verified and calculated the amount admissible for payment to the petitioner. Considering the submissions of the parties and on perusal of the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite parties, I find that the order of the Court has been complied with and as such this contempt application need not proceed further and the same accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)