1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1004/2008 (Motiram & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of order :: 12.02.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.Girish Joshi ] for the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The grievance of the petitioners is that the notices under Section 91 of the Land Revenue Act, 1956 were issued to them and they were called upon to file their reply or to represent through pleader. The said notices (Annexure-2) are placed on record at page No.31 to 36 cumulatively by the petitioners. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that respondents are dispossessing the petitioners without providing opportunity of hearing and without considering material facts of the case. It is obvious from the pleadings of the 2 case that before approaching this Court no reply/representation whatsoever has been filed by the petitioners in pursuance of the notices given to them. Therefore, I am not inclined to interfere in this matter. However, I deem it just and proper to grant liberty to the petitioners to file their reply/representation before Up-Tehsildar respondent No.4 within a period of fifteen days from today. Upon filing the such representation/reply, the Up-Tehsildar respondent No.4 may decide the said representation/reply filed by the petitioners by a speaking order after providing them opportunity of hearing within a period of fifteen days thereafter. However, if any adverse order is passed against the petitioners then they are free to file fresh petition before this Court. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. A.K. Chouhan/-