IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 6046 of 2008. Decided on: October 25, 2010. Dipo Devi …..Petitioner. Versus State of H.P.& Ors. ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner: None. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K.Bawa, AG, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G., for respondents No. 1 & 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “i) That the applicant prays that the appointment of Respondent No. 3 to the post of Anganwari Worker made by Respondents 1 &2 in an illegal manner without following the criteria and the scheme may kindly be quashed and set aside. ii) That the Respondents be directed to consider the appointment of the applicant to the post of Anganwari Worker in Anganwari Centre, Shilla.” 2. In the reply, at paragraphs 4 to 6, it is stated as follows: “ (4) to (6) In reply to this para it is submitted that interviews for the post of Anganwari Worker were conducted and applicant appeared in the interview alongwith other candidates. Selection Committee recommended the name of respondent No.3, Smt. Indira Devi for the said post on merit basis. The applicant obtained 7 marks, Whereas respondent No.3 secured 15 marks as is evident from Annexure R-1 alongwith its English versions as R-I/A. As regards the allegation of higher qualified leveled by the applicant has no relevancy, as the selection has been made by the Selection Committee on the basis of the performance made by the candidates in the interview. Moreover, the respondent No.3 2 is experience holder and served as Helper in the Anganwari Centre.” 3. There is no rejoinder, as yet. In view of the reply, as above, the Writ petition is dismissed. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. October 25, 2010. ( Justice Kuldip Singh ), (karan/vs) Judge.