-N N TWE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA T BANGAL ORE DATED TNE 6TH DV! NE JANUARY 0 1998 BEFORE 2H 4 HON’BLE MR,JUSTICE d,N,NARANAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION_NO.4063/1996 BETWEEN: - The S ecial Land Acqusition offi er, Hidkal Darn Project 0 jjaa , tTuknri Ta 1 uk, BeI’jaurn District, ,, PETITIONER p c4 c A N 0:- 1, r n ararn Bhtrnasioqh Chougils, 2. Dalsingh Rarnaslngh Chougula teceasd by his L,R 2 a) Kashibai Dalasingh Chougula. 2 b G$nagibai Harisingh C’hoigul 2 c) Vinod Harisiogh Chougula 2 t, Bhalrtsinoh Daasngu Chougula, 3. Lawian / nkaoa Onoiqula Deceasei by his L,Rs, 3 a Laxrnibsi Laxrna (‘hcnqula, 3 b) Dhanasingh Laxrnan Chougula, 4, Fa<ira Venkappa Chougula, 5, T pana Rarna ingh Cn ugl, all are R/o,Yarnakanarnaradi 0 TaIk Hukeri, ,, RESPOIDINTS S , : 2 :— Civil Revision Petition is filed U/s,115 of CPC against the order dated 17—4—1996 passed ifl Ex.No.49/199l on the file of the Civil Judge, S ag ar, This Civil Revision Petition coming on for adMission this day, the Court made the following: •..ORDER The Special Land Acquisition officer, Hidkal Dam Project, has challenaed the order of the Addle Civil Judge, Chlkodi on order passed in Execution Case No.49/91 over ruling the objections filed by the State that the decree was obtained by fraud by the claimants in collusion with the Land Acquisition Officials, No such objection could have been made n the Execution case when the decree itself has been oassed, Revision is accordingly dismissed, JUDGE a ‘ins, R, By :±jS C, By :