1 22 wp 6606.10.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION srk WRIT PETITION NO.6606 OF 2010 Jayprakash Bapuso Patil & Anr. ..Petitioners. v/s. Radhabai Tukaram Aitawade & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr. V.B.Rajure for the Petitioners. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 31ST AUGUST, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners. 2 The Respondents/Plaintiffs had filed Special Civil Suit No.45 of 2006 seeking the declaration that the sale deed executed by the original Defendant no.3 in favour of the Defendant Nos.1 and 2, who are the present Petitioners, was not binding on them. Pending the suit they filed an Application Exhibit 55 seeking amendment of the plaint, whereby the suit was sought to be converted into a partition suit alongwith the declaration that the sale deed in favour of the present Petitioners is not binding. That Application was allowed, said order is challenged in the present Petition. 2 22 wp 6606.10.doc 3 On hearing the learned counsel for the Petitioners and in view of the facts of the case, I find no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order. Infact, the amendment was sought just to avoid multiplicity of the litigations between the parties and it will be in the interest of both the parties. Therefore, the Petition stands dismissed. [ J.H.BHATIA, J. ]