IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED WRIT APPEAL NO : 227 of 2002 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 30-11- 2001 in WP NO : 16349 OF 1992 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1. K.Arjun Reddy, S/o K.V.Reddy, SVS High School, Nallangadu, Chittoor District. 2. M.Jayaram Reddy, S/o M.C.Venkata Subba Reddy, SVS High School, Nallangadu, Chittoor District. 3. M.Pullaiah S/o M.Subba Ramaiah, SVS High School, Nallangadu, Chittoor District. 4. D.Yasoda D/o Bujji Naidu, SVS High School, Nallangadu, Chittoor District. 5. V.Parvathamma W/o A.Ramachandra Reddy, SVS High School, Nallangadu, Chittoor District. 6. V.Savithri D/o Purushothama Naidu, SVS High School, Nallangadu, Chittoor District. 7. D.Ravindra Naidu, S/o Munaswamy Naidu, SVS High School, Nallangadu, Chittoor District. 8. S.Gopala Krishna Rao, S/o Govinda Rao, SVS High School, Nallangadu, Chittoor District. 9. A.Hemachandra Reddy S/o A.Dasa Reddy, SVS High School, Nallangadu, Chittoor District. 10. V.Ramaiah S/o V.Chengaiah, SVS High School, Nallangadu, Chittoor District. ..... APPELLANTS AND 1. The Director of School Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2. The District Education Officer, Chittoor, Chittioor District. 3. Sri Venkateswara Sanskrit High School Committee, Rep. by its President-- Sri Vidyananda Giri Swamy, Vyasashramam, Chittoor District. 4. The Correspondent, Sri Venkateswara Sanskrit High School, Nallangadu, Chittoor District. 5. Dr.M.N.Raja Reddy, Pallavi Nursing Home, Chittoor. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants: MRS.Y.ANUPAMA DEVI. Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION. The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED W.A.227 OF 2002 ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice J.Chelameswar) The learned counsel appearing on either side agreed that the writ appeal is liable to be allowed. Recording the said submission, the writ appeal is allowed, and consequently, the proceedings impugned in the writ petition are liable to be quashed and accordingly quashed. No costs. ______________ J.Chelameswar, J ___________________ Ghulam Mohammed, J 28-04-2005. mrk To 1. The Director of School Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2. The District Educational Officer, Chittoor, Chittioor District. 3. The President-- Sri Vidyananda Giri Swamy, Sri Venkateswara Sanskrit High School Committee, Vyasashramam, Chittoor District. 4. The Correspondent, Sri Venkateswara Sanskrit High School, Nallangadu, Chittoor District. 5. Two CCs to the G.P. for School Education, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 6. Two CD copies.