IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M No.1665-M of 2010 Date of Decision:8.3.2010 Neeraj .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gurpartap Singh Gill, Addl. A.G. Haryana. Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate for the complainant. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was named alongwith Rajender son of Kaptan. Kaptan son of Chandni and Rajender were declared innocent. They have been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. whereas, challan has been presented against the petitioner who was not even named in the FIR although subsequently named in the supplementary statement of the complainant. The petitioner is in custody since 5.9.2009. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panipat. 8.3.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE