1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.12.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.(MD)No.13893 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 A.Rupy Arulmony ... Petitioner Vs The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate, Madurai, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the respondent in his proceedings in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2842/A1/2011 dated 14.10.2011 and quash the same and direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner treating the period of suspension as on duty and pay the petitioner and consequential arrear of salary thereof. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Vellaiswamy For Respondent : Mr.B.Pugalendhi Special Government Pleader O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the respondent in his proceedings in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2842/A1/2011 dated 14.10.2011 and quash the same and direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner treating the period of suspension as on duty and pay the petitioner and consequential arrear of salary thereof. 2. Heard Mr.K.Vellaiswamy, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.B.Pugalendhi, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondent. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. The petitioner has come before this Court challenging the order of suspension dated 14.10.2011, even without making any application to recall or review the suspension order. 5. The learned Special Government Pleader also submits that this Writ Petition is not maintainable for the simple reason that the petitioner after receiving the order of suspension, she has not even made any representation to recall or review the suspension order. 6. Therefore, this Court after considering the request of the petitioner, gives liberty to the petitioner to make an appropriate application to recall or review the order suspension before the concerned Authority. 7. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate, Madurai, Madurai District. +1cc to M/s.K.Vellaiswamy, Advocate Sr.no.42869 +1cc to the Special Govt.Pleader, Sr.No.22907 ssl ssk/19.12.2011 /4c-2p/- W.P.(MD)No.13893 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 07.12.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/