IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2796 of 2007 MD. INAMULHAQUE, SON OF VASIMUDDIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BANSITIKAR, P.S. SABOUR, DISTRICT BHAGALPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. 3. THE DIRECTOR, RAJBHASHA DEPARTMENT, DIRECTORATE OF URDU, PATNA, BIHAR. 4. THE SECRETARY, RAJBHASHA DEPARTMENT, DIRECTORATE OF URDU, PATNA, BIHAR. 5. THE SECRETARY, PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS AND RAJBASHA DEPARTMENT, JHARKHAND, RANCHI. 6. THE CHAIRMAN, STATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, BIHAR, PATNA. 7. THE DEPUITY SECRETARY, PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS AND RAJBASHA DEPARTMENT, JHARKHAND, RANCHI. 8. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, RAJBHASHA DEPARTMENT, DIREDCTORATE OF URDU, PATNA, BIHAR. 9. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BELHAR BLOCK, BANKA. ----------- 02. 08.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State of Bihar and Jharkhand. 2. Petitioner at the relevant time serving as Urdu Typist in the block office, Belhar within the district of Banka in the State of Bihar. He has filed this writ petition questioning the correctness of the order contained in letter no.28/32/2005- SR(S) office order no.45(Jha)/2006 dated 7th Feb. 2006 issued by the Personnel, Public Grievance and Pension Ministry, Personnel and Training Department, Government of India, whereunder services of the petitioner has been allocated to the State of Jharkhand. He has also challenged the office order bearing Memo No.136 dated 12th April, 2006, Annexure-5 issued by the Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Official Language Department of the State of Jharkhand, whereunder petitioner along with others has been posted as Urdu Typist in the block 2 office, Madhupur in the district of Deoghar, Jharkhand. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that before allocating him to the State of Jharkhand his option was not asked for, which is required to be sought and considered by the Union of India in the light of the provisions contained in Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000. This writ petition has been filed without even impleading the Union of India as a party respondent, as such, correctness of the aforesaid submission can not be verified. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority of the Personnel and Training Department of the Union of India for redressal of his grievance. Any representation filed annexing a copy of this order should engage necessary attention of the competent authority of the Union. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that in compliance of the order, Anenxure-5 petitioner has already joined the post of Urdu Typist in Madhupur Block of Deoghar district, Jharkhand. 4. With the liberty aforesaid, the writ application is disposed of. Rajesh/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)