y \ - /- 2- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH1 WRIT PETITIONfS) N0. &^5. /2010_, ss^ PETITIONER: Arul Kiimar Dybey, son of Prem Shankar Dubey, aged about 45 years, working as Head Master, Govt. F'rimary School, Pandripani, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. versys Resoondents , «v/0< \'v ..wy'.^' ^7 fl.-y '.< V? ^Y^y >^y l./ State ofChhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. District Education OfBcer, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. ^ 3. Block Education OfEcer, Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhatdsgarh. 4. Budnath Ram, son of Chetan Ram, Upper Division Teacher, Working at Girls Middle School, Sendrimunda, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ff ' .-'E^:^';;:':,L-^^;-: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIL.^PUR PETITIONER WRIT PETmON(S) No. 672 of2010 Anil Kumar Dubev. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisfi;arh & Others. VVRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITLTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: Shri C.J.K.Rao. Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri A.V.Shridhar, Paiel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 to 3. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed cn 20U1 day ofApril, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this petition has already been granted by the State authorities. Thus, notiimg sun-'ives in this petition and this petition has become infmctuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for otlier side does not controvert the above submission. 3. In view of the above. the writ petition is dismissed as havini beeome infhictuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge