IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37144 of 2009 MANOJ KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30.10.2009 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 81/09 for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 498(b), 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. Apart from the allegations that has been set out in the F.I.R. relating to dowry, harassment and torture, the main dispute appears to be by reason of matrimonial dissatisfaction between the parties giving rise to the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and agreeable for return of the informant to her matrimonial home and she would be kept with due care and dignity. Learned counsel further denies the allegations that has been set out in the F.I.R. regarding torture, harassment and dowry or of misleading the informant or her family. 2 Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, Manoj Kumar, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 81 of 2009. Bibhash (Jyoti Saran, J. )