'7 RESPONDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARHA:!' BILASPUR UTOT PETmON fS) No. 1705 of2009 PETmONER : Viaodanmd Pandey s/o Shri Suiyaaath Paiidey, aged about 50 years, Lab Techniciaii, Central Semen Statin), Veterinarv Seraices, Anjora Durg (CG) VERSUS I. The State ot' Chhattisgarh, through the Secretaiy, Departinent ofVetermary Serviees, Mantralaya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) The Director, Direetorate of Veterinary Services Near Ourutej Bahadur Pa-k, O.E. Road,Raipur(C.G.) 3. Deputy Directw, Vetainary Services, Durg, DistritDurg(C.G.) 4. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Peiisioii, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRTT PETITION UNDER ARITCLE 226 OF THE CC»[S'm'UTIONOF DMDIA SB: Hoa'ble Shri Satish K. Aenffliotri. J. 2. Present: ShriRalteshAn&ony, Advoeateforthepetitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate Oeneral with Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for tiie State/respuideats. ORALORDER ^passed on 3la day of Mareh, 2009) -^;-' 1. Leamed counsel appearing tbr the petitinier, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest the petition cm merits, however, prays that the respondent authorities may kindly be directed to consider and decide his pending represaitation (Amwxure P/6) as expeditiously as possible. 2. Shri Thakur, leamed Deputy Advocate General qipearing with Ms. Jain, leamed Panel Lawyer for the 8tate/resp(mdents submits that tlat tfthe representation dated 09.05.2008 (Annexure P/6) is pendiag consideration, flie ssaaae shall be considCTed and deeided by the respoudeiit-autfiorities in accordance with law, on its avm merits, within a period ofeight weeks from today. 3- s In view ofthe foregoing, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives fbr adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed o£ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aimt ir'