IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 26TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 4TH ASWINA 1930 RP.No. 1029 of 2008(Y) IN W.P.(C) NO.18053/2005 ---------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- MOLLYAMMA ANTONY AGED 53 YEARS, W/O. P.J.ANTONY, PATTARA PUTHENPARAMBIL, MUHAMMA P.O.,ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.V.P.SUKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT,TRIVANDRUM. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR ALAPPUZHA. 3. TAHSILDAR CHERTHALA. BY G.P. SRI.TEKCHAND THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... R.P. No.1029 of 2008 in W.P.(C) No.18053 of 2005 .................................................................... Dated this the 26th day of September, 2008. ORDER The petitioner has filed review petition stating that the provisions of the Finance Bill 2008 referred to in the judgment got changed when Finance Act was passed. However, on going through the judgment, I find that judgment is not based on any provision in the Finance Bill or Finance Act. In fact relief was granted to the petitioner by way of restoration of property on payment of arrears of tax with 25% of the interest thereon. This was a relief moulded by the court taking into account benefits available under the Finance Bill. However, I do not think any change made in the proposals contained in the Finance Bill when the Act was passed requires modification of the judgment. The Review Petition is accordingly dismissed. However, if petitioner has complied with the direction contained in the judgment and if consequential relief is not granted to her, she is free to file Contempt petition. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms