IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-38212 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: 03.02.2011 Sunita ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. K.S. Hissowal, Advocate for the petitioner. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of petitioner-Sunita for issuing directions to official respondents to take action against private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that respondent No.4 who is brother-in-law of the petitioner has scribed a forged Will on behalf of mother-in-law of petitioner in favour of respondents No.5 and 6. This has been done just to grab the property of petitioner. The validity of Will is disputed, which is a matter of civil dispute and the remedy available to the petitioner has not been availed by her. There is no merit in the present petition and the same is dismissed accordingly. However, the petitioner is at liberty to avail an alternative remedy available to her under law. February 03, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE Note:-Whether this case is to be referred to the Reporter .......Yes/No