IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.66 of 2009 1. Ravindra Mahto 2. Shailendra Mahto @ Surendra Mahto Both sons of Sri Shridhar Mahto resident of village Durgapatti P.S. Harlakhi Dist. Madhubani Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR Opposite party ---------- 03 24.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This petition for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners, who are accused for offences punishable under sections 376,363 and 498 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 (Ravindra Mahto) has already been arrested. Hence he withdraws this petition for anticipatory bail with regard to petitioner no.1 and presses this petition only with regard to petitioner no.2 Shailedra Mahto @ Surendra Mahto. It is quite apparent that the victim girl in her statement under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has clearly stated that she was kidnapped by the accused persons on the threat of revolver and three accused persons committed rape upon her one after other and it was petitioner no.2 who was going to sell the victim. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as arguments of the parties, this Court does not find any merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. shahid (S.N.Hussain, J)