: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.593 OF 2009 Pravin Dnyaneshwar Pawar .. Applicant V/s. Shaikh Mujawar Tamboli .. Respondent Mr. C.G. Patil for the Applicant. None for the Respondent. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 26 TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C.: 1. The applicant is aggrieved by the order passed by the Small Causes Court, Pune on 24th July, 2009 in Miscellaneous Application No.85 of 2008, by which the ex-parte decree in Civil Suit No.372 of 2007 has been set aside on payment of costs of Rs.1,000/-. According to the learned Advocate for the applicant, he has already taken over possession of the suit premises and he now apprehends that he will have to part with the possession since the decree has been set aside. : 2 : 2. The order which is challenged in this Civil Revision Application does not indicate or direct the applicant to hand over possession of the suit premises to the respondent. In fact, there is no observation at all regarding the possession of the suit premises. In these circumstances, the question of giving any relief to the applicant on this apprehension does not arise. 3. The Civil Revision Application is dismissed. 4. It appears that, according to the learned Advocate, an application has already been filed by the respondent for restitution of his possession. That will be heard on merits by the Court. 5. If the applicant is aggrieved by the order, he is always free to challenge the same. .......