[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLAGTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2319 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2319 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2319 OF 2005 IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 14055 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 14055 OF 2005 SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 14055 OF 2005 Madhav Bhargav Marathe ...Applicant V/s Suresh Dattatraya Bashete & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Mandar Limaye for the applicant. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. DATE : 19TH JUNE, 2006. DATE : 19TH JUNE, 2006. DATE : 19TH JUNE, 2006. p.c. . Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant. Perused the Civil Application. By this Civil Application, the applicant is seeking condonation of delay. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). ( DR.S RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) ( DR.S RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) ( DR.S RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)