IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 14307 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: August 18, 2010. Sonu ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) Present: Mr. Gorav Kathuria, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.M.Anand, Addl.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in FIR No. 77 dated 12.02.2010, under Sections 398/401 IPC and 25/54/59 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station city Ballabgarh. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. CRM No.M-14307 of 2010 It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that only rod has been allegedly recovered from him and that he has been continuing in custody since 12.02.2010. It is further contended that he has been falsely implicated in some cases of theft by the police on the alleged disclosure statements made by the petitioner in this case and that he is on bail in all those cases. Learned counsel for the State has not disputed these facts. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Sonu, is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Faridabad. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) August 18, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2