IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No. 11713 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 6, 2009 SANDHYA DEVI ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. SK Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that although the services of the petitioner have been ordered to be regularised with effect from 19.2.1999, vide order dated 20.3.2009, however, seniority list has not been finalised. In regard to the regularisation of the services of the petitioner from back date, reference has been made to Annexure P-1, in which the following has been made clear:- “It is further ordered that Smt.Sandhya Devi shall be entitled to all benefits, whatsoever, flowing from order of Civil Writ Petition No. 11713 of 2009 2 regularization of her services including assignment of ante-dated seniority in the cadre from the date she had been inducted into service on regular basis.” Learned counsel for the petitioner states that, now, without finalising the seniority list, the case of the petitioner cannot be considered for promotion to the post of Lecturer. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Heard. This petition is disposed of with directions to the respondents to consider the implication of order (Annexure P-1) and, thereafter, consider the case of the petitioner, if the petitioner is so entitled for promotion, considering the seniority of the petitioner. August 6, 2009 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?