-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.5375 OF 2004 NO.5375 OF 2004 NO.5375 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra and ors. ... Petitioners v/s Sadashiv B. Koravi and ors. ... Respondents Mr Nitin Deshpande, AGP for Petitioners. None for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 29TH JUNE 2005. -2- P.C. :- 1. Both the Courts below have concurrently found that the plaintiffs are entitled to temporary injunction. The order of temporary injunction is operating since the year 2002. In my opinion, therefore, it will not be in the interest of justice to entertain the application for condonation of delay. However, considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the Trial Court is directed to hear the suit as expeditiously as possible. Petition is disposed off. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Personal Secretary of this Court as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. --------------------