wf tz^tfo6 EN THE fflGSH COURT OF JUDICATUKE AT BttASPUR. CHHATHSGARH ^ €e/ ,.x%^^ ft'^'^ ^-"^/^PETITIONERS/: "^>( 1-V APlaintiffs) WritPctitfonNo. 1. 8^f2(K Ssisgi^.ogoc?! •>»-- ^ .^ ...<y^ -^s^?'""^2. Pyar®ohmmQ^>/!^^^ S/o Maksood Ahmed Qureshi, Aged about 35 years, R/o Juna, BUaspur, Tehsil: Juiia, BUaspur, Cliliattisgarh. Smt. Bashiran, Aged about 29 yea-s, ^/^? _^^:>";^'<^.- D/o Maksood Ahmed Qureshi. ^ ,3. Salita, Aged aboul 27 yeais, D/o Maksood Ahmed Qureshi. Pelilioners/Plaintiffs No.2 & 3 both are residents of Bhatapara, District: Raipur, Chhattisgarh. - Versus - RESPONDENTS/: (Defendants) G. .00^ ^^p^\ 0£ \\^ vk^' ^ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Habib Ahmed, S/o Maksood Ahmed Qureshi. Isarar Ahmed, S/o Maksood Ahmed Qiireshi. Smt. Afarose Ahmed, D/o Maksood Ahmed Qureshi. Smt. Naseem Ahmed, D/o Maksood Ahmed Qureshi. Sahamiaj, Aged about 30 years, S/o Maksood Ahmed Qureshi. Kum. Siuioha, Aged about 23 years, D/o Maksood Ahmcd Qureshi. Smt. Sakeela, Aged about 40 years, D/u Maksuod Ahmed Qureshi. Respondents/Defendants No.l to 7 all are residents of Kursipaar, Bhilai, 1i n(' ^^^lS^SS^SiHwSS^y.^^'^'^-.-^^^.-S-^^SS^SSf^G^TS-^^'^ Opposite Purani Dhannakanta, Gali No.3, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh. 8. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The CoUector, Bilaspur, District: Bilaspiir, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETH'ION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CgilSTn'UTION__OF_^raA_jroR_!^UASCE_OF APPROPMATE WMT/WmTS. DIRECTIONS ETC.. IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORAIU AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF UKE NATURE The petitioners, above named, most respectfully beg to submit as undcr: - K 311^ ^il R-ii'*] 3n^r s^ich y[5fl Tumane ^ST •^ltlcrl'M, eill'M'16, {°(c11'M'i< l^.|'i^.2-'3>S-?-/2rtrfc ^ItRW S(»*1|ch 200 sn^?i'renwBfl^r SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra IVIohan Shrivastava. J. 29-04-2010 Shri Sudeep Agrawal, counsel fb| Shri Anand Kumar Gupta, counsl No.8. (I.ANo.3) for withdrawal of writ petitioi^ order to settle the dispute amicably, th| petition. Petitionere pray for liberty settlement/compromise js not arrived at| The application (I.A.No.3) for witltidrawal ofwrit petition js allowed. Accordingly, the writ petition is as prayed for. '^P^pfh' ^R^Tf ^ Ir^t <Pn'^,i< ^sriiOTsn^r the petitioners. =1 for respondents No.1 to 4 & 7. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, P^nel Lawyer for the State/respondent Learned oounsel for the petititiners submits that an application has been filed. It is stated that jn s petitioners wantf to withdraw this to approach the Court again, if lismlssed as withdrawn with liberty Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge .1-_.. 1-. [1Tt®Wa'1