mnm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 2029 OF 1996 Smt. Rajani Ramesh Samel ...Plaintiff Vs. Rajan Anant Kadu & Ors. ...Defendants None for the Plaintiff Mr. N.V. Moye for the Defendants CORAM : SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED : 20TH JUNE, 2011 P.C. : 1. Reasons why the suit is required to be dismissed on the question of law were recorded on 19th April 2011 when the Plaintiff and Advocate were absent and when Mr. Moye on behalf of the Defendants showed to the Court the facts of the case. 2. The Defendants’ Advocate has given notice to the Plaintiff’s Advocate as directed on the earlier date. The Plaintiff’s Advocate appeared on 13th June 2011 and sought time to consider the legal position. He has remained absent today. T he reasons for dismissal of the suit on the question of law mentioned on 19th April 2011 need not be repeated. 3. For the reasons mentioned therein the suit is required to be dismissed upon the admitted facts reflected from the plaint itself under the provisions of Order 15 Rule 1 of the C.P.C. 4. Hence the suit is dismissed. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)