BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Second day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9145 of 2011 1. SETHURAMAN 2. ILAYA PERUMAL 3. V. CHITRA 4. PONNUSAMY 5. VIJAYALAKSHMI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 to 5 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOOMBUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.PALANIVELAYUTHAM Advocate For Respondent : A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 420 and 494 IPC and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, (Crl.Side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the de-facto complainant no case has been registered only petition enquiry is pending. 3. Considering the rival submission made on either side, the respondent is directed not to harass the petitioners. The report is directed to follow procedure contemplated under D.K.BASU VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL reported in AIR (1997) SC 610 under the guise of enquiry. With above observation, the petition is disposed of. sd/- 02/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOOMBUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADURAI, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.S.PALANIVELAYUTHAM Advocate SR.No.25758 GH : 03.08.2011 : 1p/4c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9145 of 2011 Date :02/08/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/