^" 8@nch LN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(CHHATTISGARH) WRITPETITION fC) NO.S'330 /201 PET1TIONER: RESPONDENTS *"'' ^••;^ ^^e^ ^'..'•••i,^\Y-- ^""y"\'^"' ,... <^''>' ^^' .^ ^-' •>s^>r .«•'' •t-'\^^ ^\..'^' ^-y" ^ ^" Premlal . Chandrakar, S/o Banshilal Chandrakar, aged about 62 years, R/o Bajrang Chowk, Ward No. 5,Village and Post Kurud, District - Dhamtari (C.G.) (Member of Vrihatta Krishi Credit Co-operative Society Limited, Kurud). VERSUS 1: . The State of C.G. Through - The Secretary, Co- operative Department, D.K.S. Bhowan, MontrQlQyQ, Roipur (C.G.) 2. -^ The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, VivekonQnd NogQr, Pension BodQ Chowk, Roipur, (C.G.) 3. " The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Co-operative Distribution Union Limited 880, Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^^^a^^.. /^' ^ ^yEy^'v"""m ^ '%„ ^;"' HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRIT PETITION (C) No. 3830 of201 1 Premlal Cha^drakar. RE8PONDENT8 VER8US The State ofC.G. & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARHCLE 226/227 OF TE1E CONSTITUTION OF ENDIA SB: Hon*Ue Shri Satish K. Aenihotei. J. Present: Shri S.C.Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govemment Advocate forthe State/respondent No. 1 aad 2. ORDERrORAL) (Passed on 18th day ofJuly, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made a representation to the respondent No. 2, Registrar, Cooperative Societies^ on 28.06.2011 (Annexure P/3) raising his grievanees with regard to non-compliance of statutory duties by the aufhorities under section 18(A) ofthe Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Shri Venna further submits that reasonable time has elapsed, but fhe respondent No. 2 is not acting on the aforestated representetion. 2. Shri Bhatia, leamed State counsel submite that if the rqiresentation, as aforestated, is still pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent No. 2 m accordance wifh law, as expeditiously as possible. 3. In view of tiie foregoing, accordmg to Shri Verma, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. 4. Accordingly^ fhe writ petition is disposed ofwifh a direction to fhe respondent No. 2 to consider and decide tfae representation offhe petitioner, a^s aforestated, aiid pass appropriate order in accordance with law, on its own merit and perspective within a period offour weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. Sd/- _ .; Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Amit