THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A.No.100 of 1999 JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed by respondent No.1 in M.V.O.P.No.407 of 1990 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-District Judge, Guntur feeling aggrieved by the order, dated 26.10.1992, awarding compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- in favour of the 2nd respondent. The main grievance of the appellant is about the exoneration of the 1st respondent herein, the insurer, from the liability. The appellant did not deposit the amount as stipulated under the proviso to Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act. An application for dispensing with the deposit of the amount was filed. This Court passed an order on 22.01.1999 dispensing with the deposit, by observing that the Court shall not proceed to consider the matter on merits, unless the amount is deposited. Even after the appeal was admitted, the amount was not deposited. When the matter was listed for compliance, an order was passed on 13.09.2004 granting three weeks time for complying with the objection. So far, the condition is not complied with. Further, since this Court did not grant any stay of operation of the decree, it might have been executed by this time and in case, no E.P. was filed, the limitation has expired by this time. Viewed from any angle, the appeal has become infructuous. The C.M.A. is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 08.12.2011 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A.No.100 of 1999 Date: 08.12.2011 JSU