IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Crim. Application No.7515 of 2005 Mr.Vivek Talwar ..Petitioner vs. Mukand Global Finances Ltd. and ors. ...Respondents Shri N.K.Thakkar with Shri Prakash Naik for petitioner. Shri U.V.Nikam, A.P.P. for respondent State. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR J. 6th December,2005 6th December,2005 6th December,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Asl alternative efficacious remedy is available to the applicant by way of revision before the Sessions Court in view of the decision of this Court in the case of V.K.Jain and others Vs. Pratap V.Padode reported in 2005(3) Mh.L.J. 778, Counsel for the applicant fairly prays for withdrawal of this application with liberty to take recourse to remedy for revision. Hence, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. All questions are left open. 2. In case, there is any delay in filing Revision Application, Court will take into account the fact that the applicant had first approached this Cosurt which period will have to be excused in computing delay.