IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17521 of 2010 DEOMANI, DAUGHTER OF SHEOPUJAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. HASANPUR, PIPRA, P.S AND DISTRICT ARWAL (BIHAR) PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF CHITRAKUT NAGAR, ROAD NO. 3, PATNA- 800 012. ----- PETITIONER Versus 1. NATHUNI CHAUDHARY, SON OF LATE TRIBENI CHAUDHARY 2. MITHILESH CHAUDHARY 3. SIKANDAR CHAUDHARY 4. JAICHAND CHAUDHARY 5. JAIPRAKASH CHAUDHARY 6. JAIYENDRA CHAUDHARY, SON OF NATHUNI CHAUDHARY MINOR UNDER THE GUARDIANSHIP OF HIS FATHER NEXT FRIEND AND WELL WISHER, NATHUNI CHAUDHARY 7. MOST. PARANO KUER, WIDOW OF LATE RAMCHANDRA CHAUDHARY 8. VIJAY KUMAR CHAUDHARY, SON OF LATE RAMCHANDRA CHAUDHARY 9. RAJEEV RAUSHAN CHAUDHARY 10. WICKY CHAUDHARY, MINOR SONS OF VIJAY KUMAR CHAUDHARY MINORS UNDER THE GUARDIANSHIP OF THEIR FATHER NEXT FRIEND AND WELL WISHER VIJAY KUMAR CHAUDHARY 11. MOSTT. SUDAMA DEVI @ TILESHWARI DEVI, WIDOW OF LATE RADHIKA CHAUDHARY 12. RINTU CHAUDHARY, SON OF LATE RADHIKA CHAUDHARY ------ RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 27.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner has challenged the order dated 13.7.2010, passed in Execution Case No. 6 of 2003. By order dated 13.7.2010, the date for delivery of possession has been fixed. The petitioner claims that he is a purchaser from the plaintiff of an earlier suit of partition. I see no reason to interfere with the order impugned as the petitioner, who is not party in suit cannot pray for staying the execution case on any ground whatsoever. In the result, this writ application is accordingly dismissed. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)