IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4137 of 2010 1. GHARSHOBHIT KUMAR @ GHARSOBHIT KUMAR S/O LATE SURESH KUMAR R/O VILLAGE- GAIGHAT , P.O - ASAPARARI, P.S- SIMRI, DISTRICT- BUXAR Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA , THROUGH INSPECTOR GENERAL, of CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS , W.S.HQRS. MUMBAI 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL null CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, DAE, ZONAL HQRS ECIL POST, HYDERABAD 3. THE COMMANDANT null CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE (MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS) UNIT- UCIL , JADUGODA, DISTRICT- EAST SINGHBHUM 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTATE BHOJPUR AT ARA 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BUXAR 6. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER BHOJPUR 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SIMRI, DISTRICT- BUXAR ----------- 02/ 22.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Union of India. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 4.8.2007, passed by the Commandant, C.I.S.F., Jaduguda, Singhbhum, Respondent no.3, as contained in Annexure-8 to this application, whereunder he dismissed the petitioner on the ground that his appointment on the post of Constable, General Duty in the Reserved Category is in teeth of the subsequent certificate granted by the District Magistrate, Buxar, as it was submitted on his behalf that he was born out of the wedlock of a caste Hindu with a tribal woman. Against the order of dismissal, petitioner preferred appeal before the DIG, CISF, Hyderabad, which was also dismissed under order, bearing No. 3523 dated 14.9.2007, Annexure-9. Against the original, appellate order, 2 petitioner filed revision before the IG, C.I.S.F., Mumbai, but the same has not been considered and disposed of, although several reminders referred to in the application dated 22.12.2009 has been filed. 3. Having heard counsel for the petitioner and the Union of India, I dispose of the writ application with a direction to the I.G., C.I.S.F., Mumbai to consider and dispose of the revision petition of the petitioner in the light of the circular of the Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department of the State Government, bearing No. 99 dated 3.3.1978, as contained in Annexure-4 to this application, as early as possible, in any case within two months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)