WPMS No. 1468 of 2009 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. A.K. Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate for the respondent. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the Court finds that there is no averment indicating that the agricultural operation is going on on the land in question. In the absence of this averment, the Court is of the opinion that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in Writ Petition No. 707 (M/S) of 2011, Hari Sagar Educational Trust Vs. Uttaranchal Gramin Bank decided on 24th June, 2011. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed in terms of the aforesaid judgment. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 29.07.2011 Shiv