IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.51593-M of 2007 Date of Decision:17.12.2010 Amar Ashok Pathak .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Baldev Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sudhir Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Bajwa, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from Inspector Anil Kumar states that the untrace report has been filed in this case. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 does not dispute the same and stated that now the case is fixed for 8.1.2011. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition at this stage. Dismissed as withdrawn. 17.12.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE