IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 1866 of 2011 Date of decision: 12.5.2011 Karnail Singh … Petitioner versus Devinder Kumar … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. MJS Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Manish Bansal, Advocate, for the respondent. ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner is the defendant in the money suit on the basis of pronote dated 25.7.2008, titled Devinder Kumar v. Karnail Singh. He is aggrieved with the order dated 17.2.2011 passed by the Civil Judge(Junior Division),Phul, by dint of which his application seeking direction to the plaintiff to produce his account books before the Court has been dismissed. Heard. The stand of the defendant in the written statement is that he neither took any amount nor executed any pronote/receipt on 25.7.2008 and as such, the same are forged and fabicated documents. In view of this plea, the production of account books by the plaintiff before the Court is absolutely unnecessary. The application moved by the defendant for production of the said account books is also silent as to what is the purpose for summoning the account books when the cause of the plaintiff is based upon pronote. The learned trial Court has rightly observed while dismissing the application that the defendant has an option to examine the hand-writing C.R. No. 1866 of 2011 -2- expert to prove that the the pronote and receipt do not bear his thumb- impression and as such, there is no necessity for production of account books. There is no infirmity in the order passed by the trial Court. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. May 12, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE