IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-14254 of 2008 Date of decision:- 21.7.2008. Yunis Masih ...Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. J.S. Bains, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL J. This is a petition for direction to the respondents to take action on representation dated 31.1.2008 (Annexure P-4). Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner submitted representation dated 31.1.2008 (Annexure P-4) with the Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar but no action has been initiated on the representation of the petitioner. Keeping in view the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and others 2008 (1) RCR (Criminal) 392 such a petition for direction to the police for taking action on the complaint could not be entertained as the petitioner has effective alternative remedy under Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and as such this Court would not like to interfere in the matter in its extra ordinary jurisdiction. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail of alternative remedy in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, with liberty to the petitioner to avail of his alternative remedy in accordance with law. July 21, 2008 (RAJESH BINDAL) ritu-II JUDGE