IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL REVISION NO.81 OF 2002 Captain Anoop Kuksal ……… Revisionist Versus Smt. Madhu Kuksal & another …... Respondents Dated: October 22, 2009 Mr. Jagdish Singh Bisht, Advocate for the revisionist. None is present for the respondents HON. DHARAM VEER, J. This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist under Sections 397/401 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.), is directed against the order dated 26.8.2002 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Dehradun in Crl. Case No.649/2002, Smt. Madhu Kukshal Vs. Anoop Kukshal, whereby the learned Principal Judge allowed the application moved by the respondent no.1 u/s 125 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for interim maintenance and directed the revisionist to pay Rs.10,000/- per month to the respondents. 2. Mr. Jagdish Bisht, learned counsel for the revisionist stated before the Court that during the pendency of this revision the case has finally been decided by the court concerned and as such the revision which has been filed here against the interim maintenance has become infructuous. Therefore, he prayed that the revision may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. In view of the above, the revision is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order dated 23.09.2002 is hereby vacated. (Dharam Veer, J.) 22.10.2009 RG