IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL REVISION No.54 of 2004 Tejpal Singh Negi S/o Devi Singh, R/o Village Majri Mafi, P.O. I.I.P. Dehradun … Revisionist Versus Judge, Family Court, Dehradun & two others … Opposite Parties Dated: August 27, 2008 Sri A.K. Guatam, learned counsel for the revisionist Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for State Sri R.P. Nautiyal, learned counsel for Respondent Nos.2 & 3 HON. DHARAM VEER, J. This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist under Section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.) r/w Section 19(4) of Family Courts Act, 1984, is directed against the order dated 10.02.2004 passed by Judge, Family Court, Dehradun in Crl. Case No.106 of 2003, Smt. Manju Negi Vs. Tejpal Singh, whereby by the learned Judge, Family Court has directed the revisionist to pay Rs.3,000/- per month to Respondent No.2- Smt. Manju Negi as interim maintenance from the date of application i.e. 23.7.2003 by the 10th of each month. The arrears were also directed to be paid within two months. 2. Sri A.K. Gautam, learned counsel for the revisionist submitted at bar that he may be permitted to withdraw the present revision, however the liberty may be given to him to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. 3. In view of the aforesaid statement given by learned counsel for the revisionist, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the liberty is given to the revisionist to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. Interim order dated 13.04.2004 stands vacated. (Dharam Veer, J.) August 27, 2008 NCM