THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CRP No.5937 and 4572 of 2008 Date of Order: 25-4-2011 CRP NO.5937/2008: Between: Kona Chandra Kiran ..Petitioner and 1. Shaik Chand Basha and others. ..Respondents The Court made the following Order: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CRP No.5937 and 4572 of 2008 Common order: The revision petitioner in both the revision petitions is one and the same and he is the petitioner/claimant in MVOP No.64/2005 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-V Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada. He filed two IAs, namely, IA No.496/2008 to reopen the case for further evidence and IA No.497/2008 to issue summons to the Station House Officer, Ibrahimpatnam Police Station to produce the case file in Cr.No.347/2003; and also issue summons to M.V.N. Raju, Assistant Motor Vehicles Inspector, Vijayawada; B.Raja Rao, Sub-Inspector of Police and investigating officer in Cr.No.347/2003, who is now working in West Godavari District and Sk. Mastan Basha, who is the owner of the crime vehicle to give evidence and to produce the relevant documents. It is not in dispute, after closure of the evidence of the third respondent, the matter was posted for arguments. Having taken several adjournments, the above IAs are filed by the petitioner/claimant. Earlier the petition filed by the petitioner/claimant for summoning the Investigating Officer was dismissed on merits. The petitioner/claimant has not filed any appeal or revision against the orders passed dismissing the petition filed for summoning the investigating officer. The petitioner/claimant is aware of the contention of the Insurance Company about the involvement of the crime vehicle in the accident. Though earlier petition filed by the petitioner/claimant for summoning the Investigating Officer and other persons was dismissed, filing of these two applications is nothing but to drag on the proceedings. No infirmity is discernible in the common order passed by the lower tribunal warranting interference by this court. Both the civil revision petitions are accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J. Dt.25-4-2011 kmr