1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.34 OF 2010 Smt.Rehana A.Ansari .. Appellant V/s. Mr.Jagdish Kalwani .. Respondent Mr.Prashant D.Patil for the Appellant. Mr.R.D.Mishra for the Respondent. CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE: 19TH JULY, 2010 P.C.: First Appeal No.34 of 2010: 1. Heard Mr.Prashant Patil for the appellant and Mr.R.D.Mishra for the Respondents. 2. Admit. Mr.Mishra, learned counsel waives service on behalf of the Respondents. Call for R & P of the case. 3. Printing is dispensed with. Appellant shall file private paper book alongwith the decree forms within one year from today. Civil Application No.84 of 2010: 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, civil application is taken up for hearing. 2. By order dated 14th January, 2010 this Court ordered that there will be status quo with regard to Hut No.192 which is the subject matter of the present first appeal. It was made clear that there was no order passed in respect of Hut No.219 and liberty was given to the Respondent to take such action as he is entitled to in respect of Hut No. 219. 2 3. Mr.Patil, learned counsel for the applicant makes a statement that the applicant is in possession of Hut No.192 and is not concerned with Hut No.219. Likewise, Mr.Mishra, learned counsel for the Respondent states that the Respondent is concerned with Hut No.219 and is not concerned with Hut No.192. 4. In view of this, there shall be interim order in terms of prayer clause (a). 5. It is expressly made clear that prayer clause (a) does not pertain to Hut No.219. 6. Civil Application stands disposed of with no order as to costs. (R.G.KETKAR, J.)