IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Crl. Misc. No. M-34967 of 2010 Date of Decision:18.03.2011 Baljeet Kaur and another .....Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Abhishek Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C on behalf of petitioners, namely, Baljeet Kaur and Satnam Singh for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect their lives and liberty at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6. Reply on behalf of State has been filed in the Court and the same is taken on record. Learned State Counsel submits that statements of parents of petitioner No.1 have been recorded in which they have stated that they have no objection with regard to said marriage of the petitioners. In view of statement of parents of petitioner No.1 and the reply filed by the State, now the petitioners have no grievance against private respondents and the petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. ` March 18, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE