•i c^ l<s^7 S^gteB&nch THEHON'fiI^Hl^COBfRTOFCHHATTISGARH ATBILASPOR pEynnONER W.P.tClNK ^/2.^ Of 2011 Jaikumar Agrawal, S/o Late Padumnath Agrawal, aged about 76 years, R/o Power House Road, Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS KESPONDENTS :1^ State of Chhattisgarh, through, The Secretary Revenue Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.). 2r<TahsiIdar, Kofba Bistt. Korba(C.G.}. 3.' TheCoUector, Korba Distt. KorbafC.G.) 4.' Inderlal, aged about 33years,S/o Sachhanand Sindhi, R/o Power House Road, Distt. Korba (C.G.) •\^W/::'f ^ w ".; '/^7 Wim^PETm(MJJNDB^AR1SCLEJ226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PAR'I'ICIJLARSOF''rHEJyCTmONER:- As above in cause title. PABTICULARSG)FTHE_RESPONDENTS:- As abdvein caiisetitle. PAKTICULARS, OF THE ORDER/CAUSE AGAINST WHICH:THE PEYmCWISlBEINGMADE:- The petitioner is challenging the inactibh of Gollector, Korba in not demarcating the land in PETITi HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR WR!T PETSTION (0 N0. 5129 OF 2011 1 Jaikumar Agrawal Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J,. Pressnt:- Shri H.B.Agrawai, Senior Advocate with Shri J.K.Gupta, Advocate for the petltioner. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Passsd on this 05th day of September, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instNctions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that the petitioner wants to make a represeniation before the respondent authorities. 2. !t is ordered as prayed for. 3. Accordingiy, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above-stated submisslon. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge -/7' ashck