Crl. Misc No. M 26260 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : September 23, 2011 1. Crl. Misc No. M 26260 of 2011 Roshan Lal vs State of Punjab 2. Crl. Misc No. M 27272 of 2011 Hussan Lal vs State of Punjab *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Ms. Navdeep, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG Punjab *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This order shall dispose of Crl. Misc No. M 26250 and 27272 of 2011, as both these petitions arise from the same FIR. The petitioners seek grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.59, dated 19.5.2011, registered under Sections 323, 324, 34, 307, 308 of the IPC, at Police Station Goraya, District Jalandhar. On 15.9.2011, the following contention was noticed in Crl. Misc No. M 26260 of 2011 :- “ Learned Deputy Advocate General states that in respect of the allegations and counter allegations the detailed inquiry is underway and he may be given two weeks' time to conclude that inquiry.” Today, counsel for the respondent, on instructions from SI Crl. Misc No. M 26260 of 2011 ::2:: Satpal, states that the case, as sought to be projected by the petitioners, is found to be false and serious injuries were inflicted by the petitioners. However, MLR of the father of the petitioners shows that one grievous injury has been suffered by him and admittedly, he has been arrested and released on regular bail. As per the MLR, the injury attributed to petitioner-Roshan Lal is more serious. In the circumstances brought out above, I deem it appropriate to decline the concession of anticipatory bail to petitioner-Roshan Lal, while granting it to petitioner-Hussan Lal. Consequently, Crl. Misc No. M 26260 of 2011 is dismissed, while Crl. Misc No. M 27272 of 2011 is allowed. In the event of his arrest, the petitioner, Hussan Lal, shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Investigating Officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. ( AJAY TEWARI ) September 23, 2011. JUDGE `kk'