IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) O.S^'I /2011. WRIT PETITION (S1 N0 ^y' PETITIONER: Respondents .v^// .<^v ^M^ A^ }fy w ^r <^. ^',/ Nepal Ram Bairagi, son of Late Boloram, aged about 48 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Rajapur, Block Mainpath, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. District Education Officer, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 3. Joint Director, Treasury and Accounts, Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF aiHAmSCMRH AT BILASFUR WRTT PETmON (S) No. 3464 of2011 PEimQNER Nepal Ram Baira^. RESPONDENT8 VEKSU8 i StirteofCUisttisgarfi&Othfirs. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE GC^STmjnON OF INDIA SB: Hon*UeShriSaflshK.Affliih®trtJ. Present: Shri CJ.K.Raa, Advocate fortiie petitioiier. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Uwyer forthe State/respondeats. ORDKRrORAL) (Passed on Oltt day ofJuly, 2011) 1. I^amedcounselappearuigfor1heipetit!kttier,@nuKtariKtioiis,s»eks pennission ofliris Court to wMidraw Ais petitioai wfth iibexty to make a rq>resentatioii in fhe li^t of drcute dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P/2) issued by tfae Govemment ofGMiattis^r^ Sehool Education Department. 2. Leamed counsel qyeariag for otfa©rside has no objection. 3. No pemiission ofthis Court is required to saake repTes^utation to Ifae respondent autfiorities. Thus, sudi dureettai carmet b®issued. HowevCT, ifthe petitionCT makes a represeatatioa to the respondeirt authorities, Ifae same may be considCTed aad decided ia accwdaoce with law, on its own ma-its and perspective. 4. Witb the aforesaid observati<»i,tfae writ petition as duttnissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Amit