Cg) [mglnglgnah ,1» IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION s No. §3$ OF 2009 ("Ramdayal Saket, S/o Shri Rampati Saket, aged about 55 years, presently posted and working as Forest Range Officer, Dhamni, North Sarguja Range, Division Ambikapur, District Ambikapur (Sarguja) (CG). PETITIONER : Versus 1,; «State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, (CG). x " Under Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 3. Chief Conservator of Forest, k’ Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). Conservator of Forest, Ambikapur, Dist. Ambikapur (Sarguja( (CG). 5. Divisional Forest Officer, North Sarguja, Forest Division Ambikapur, Dist. Ambikapur (Sarguja((CG). ’ ‘W Yogendra Sahu, Forest Ranger, Forest Range Chuikhadan, Forest Division ‘~ Khairagar, Dist. Rajnandgaon (CG). RESPONDENTS : WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT CF CHHATTIS$ARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITEON (S) N05233 OF 2009 (/5 Ramdayal $aket Versus State of Chhattisgarh & G‘ihers PETITHGNER RESPONDENTS (Writ petition under Articie 226 of ihe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Pmsent :- shri BD. Guru and Shri Varunendra Mishra, counsei for the ' petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawver for the State. ORDER (GRAL) (Passed on this 14‘“ day of $eptembef. 2GDS) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finaliv. The petitioner appears to have been mainiy aggrieved by the ordei’ dated 30-6-2009 (Annexure — P11) on the ground that the respondent No.6 has been transferred in his place without transferring him from Dhamni. The petitioner has not raised any legal grounds asto why the order is bad except that there should be confirm transfer order before he is permitted to go and join some other piace. 3. The law is well settied that transfer order can be chaiienged on permissible grounds i.e. proved meta fide, infraction of ruies & regulations and lack of competence of the officer for passin the order. The petitioner has chaiienged the impugned transfer order only on the ground that there is no formal order of transfer. in view of foregoing, the State Government is directed to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders, in public interest and in administrative exigency within a v period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Tili then no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Gowrt ‘ .‘ Satish K. Agnihotrig . ‘; Judge ‘ ,