1 CRA 528-2010 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.528 OF 2010 Shahaji Govind Barad & anr. .Applicants V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors .Respondents Mr.Shekhar A. Ingawale, Advocate, for the Applicants Mrs.P.P.Bhosale, APP, for the Respondent  State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 24TH JANUARY, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. The applicants have filed this Revision questioning their conviction for the offence punishable under Sections 324 & 325 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence of rigorous imprisonment for three years with a fine of Rs.2000/- or in default rigorous imprisonment for three months imposed upon applicant 2 CRA 528-2010 Shahaji and sentence of rigorous imprisonment for three years with a fine of Rs.3000/- or in default rigorous imprisonment for six months imposed upon applicant Krishna by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Kolhapur which was maintained by the learned Sessions Judge, Kolhapur by his Judgment dated 28th October, 2010. The injured persons have filed an application with an Affidavit stating that they desire to have the matter compounded. The offence punishable under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code for which applicant Krishna has been convicted is compoundable. In view of this, since the victims desire to have the matter compounded, conviction of the applicant Krishna for the offence punishable under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence of rigorous imprisonment for three years with a fine of Rs.3000/- imposed upon applicant Krishna would have to be set aside. 3. Insofar as applicant Shahaji is 3 CRA 528-2010 concerned, he is convicted for the offence punishable under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code. This offence is not compoundable. Considering the fact that applicant Shahaji has been in jail since 28th October, 2010 i. e. almost three months now and considering the fact that parties have amicably settled the dispute between them, sentence of imprisonment imposed upon applicant Shahaji Govind Barad is reduced to rigorous imprisonment for three months with a fine of Rs.2000/- which has already been paid. The learned Counsel for the applicants states that if not paid, he is ready and willing to pay the fine now. 4. Criminal Revision Application is allowed in the above terms. Applicant Krishna be set at liberty, if not want in any other case forthwith. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)