IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17191 of 2009 BINDESHWARI SHARMA @ SADA @ KANTU SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.11.2009 This is the case of mis-use of privilege of bail. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was on bail before the trial court but he absented and due to this he was declared absconder on 18.09.2007 as a result of which warrant of arrest was issued against him. Further submission is that the petitioner was arrested on 29.12.2008 and since then he is in custody. It is submitted that the absence of the petitioner before the trial court was for a period of about 14 months and the cause of absence was that he had gone outstation for earning livelihood. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 29.12.2008 and thus he has been sufficiently penalized for his absence before the trial court. The learned counsel says that he undertakes on behalf of the petitioner that in future he will be regular in his attendance before the trial court. Mr. R.P.S. Singh, the learned A.P.P. does not point out any other material against the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Bindeshwari Sharma @ Sada @ Kantu Sharma - 2 - is admitted to bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.V, Saharsa, in Sessions Trial No. 236 of 2006, arising out of Basanahi P.S. Case No.01 of 2000. (C.M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-