IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4223 of 2009 SHANTI ELECTRICALS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR NILKANTA SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 04. 27.10.2010 The reason for rejection of the claim of the petitioner is because the bill raised by him is supposed to be inflated and not based on actual supplies made for the work done thereto. If the petitioner still tenders a bonafide bill with supporting material the issue may be reconsidered by the opposite parties or else petitioner has remedy by moving the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction where he can lead evidence in support of the claim which can be best appreciated by the court concerned based on the evidence which may come. The contempt application is disposed of with the above observation/liberty. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)