THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.656 OF 2007 ORDER: This revision petition is directed against the order, dated 18.01.2007, passed by the III Additional District Judge, Kakinada, in I.A.No.3936 of 2006 in C.M.A.No.66 of 2003. In the suit being O.S.No.165 of 2003 filed by the third party, the properties were attached in I.A.No.824 of 2003 in which the respondent herein filed I.A.No.866 of 2003 for raising the attachment, whereas the petitioner filed I.A.No.1164 of 2003 to handover the keys of the attached property to him. The lower Court allowed I.A.No.866 of 2003 and dismissed I.A.No.1164 of 2003 filed by the petitioner. On dismissal of the said I.A, the petitioner filed C.R.P.No.1311 of 2004 before this Court and the same was also dismissed. On dismissal of the revision petition, the petitioner filed the above CMA assailing the correctness of the order passed in I.A.No.824 of 2003 for attaching the properties. In the said CMA he filed I.A.No.3936 of 2006 under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC to permit him to cross-examine the respondent herein and the other persons, who gave affidavits on behalf of the respondent in the lower Court. The learned Judge observed that the suit filed by the plaintiff against the petitioner for recovery of amounts was adjusted and the suit was dismissed recording full satisfaction of the decretal amount. In the suit the properties of the respondent were said to be attached, and on a claim petition filed by the respondent the attachment was raised and the properties were ordered to be returned to the respondent, and that as on that date no suit was pending nor any order of attachment was subsisting. Observing so, the learned Judge dismissed the I.A. Since no suit was pending as on the date of the impugned order, and the order of attachment in I.A.No.824 of 2003 also stood dissolved on raising the attachment, the appeal becomes infructuous. In view of the same, the present revision petition filed against the interlocutory order pending the appeal, cannot be entertained. Accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the lower Court is directed to pass appropriate orders in the appeal within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ (A. GOPAL REDDY, J.) 17th December, 2009 Js.