IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.3200 of 2011. Decided on: 11th May, 2011. Barkha Ram Joshi. ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and anr. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Vashishta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i) Writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to grant the benefit of seniority, pay fixation and counting of the service rendered by the petitioner on ad hoc basis for the purpose of pension w.e.f. 27.8.1983 to 3.3.1996 i.e. the due date in favour of the petitioner as has been allowed to similarly placed persons in the department of Education, Government of Himachal Pradesh along with consequential benefits.” 2. It is submitted that the issue is covered by the judgment of this Court in Paras Ram vs. State of H.P., CWP (T) No.7712 of 2008 decided on 19.5.2009 (Latest HLJ 2009 (HP) 887), which has been implemented also. If that be so, there is no point in discriminating the petitioner in case the petitioner is similarly situated as the petitioner covered 2 by the judgment, referred to above. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as follows: 3. In the event of the petitioner filing a representation within a period of one month from today before the first respondent, the said respondent will consider the same in the light of the judgment, referred to above and in case the petitioner is similarly situated as the petitioner in the judgment referred to above, the petitioner herein also shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. The needful in this regard and also disbursing the benefits shall be done within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment referred to above by the petitioner. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 11th May, 2011. ( Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr) Judge.