THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6136 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the order, dated 19.08.2010, passed in E.A.No.134 of 2010 in E.A.No.18 of 2009 in E.P.No.225 of 2008 in O.S.No.57 of 2004, by the learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge, (FTC), Nellore. By the aforesaid order, the Court below allowed E.A.No.134 of 2010 filed by the first respondent to recall P.W.5 for cross-examination. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that earlier, Advocate Commissioner was appointed to examine P.W.5 and the first respondent having failed to question the said order, is not entitled to recall P.W.5 for cross-examination. It is very difficult to accept such contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner in view of the fact that the Advocate Commissioner has not executed the warrant to examine P.W.5 and returned the same. In view of the reasons given by the Court below for recalling P.W.5 for cross-examination, I do not find any illegality, which needs interference in the impugned order under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 18th JANUARY, 2011. kvni