SSM 1 arbp.1424.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION PETITION NO. 1424 OF 2010 Ibrahim abdulbhai Pansare .... Petitioner Versus Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. .... Respondent Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar for the Petitioner. Mr. Sunil Gangan i/by RMG Law Associates for the Respondent. CORAM: S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 8 th FEBRUARY, 2011. P.C.: From the record it appears that the Petitioner carries on business in Pune district and it dealt with the divisional office of the Respondent Corporation, which is located in Pune district. 2. In these circumstances, I am of the opinion that any challenge to the Award would be competent before the Court having jurisdiction in Pune district. The Petition is therefore returned to the SSM 2 arbp.1424.10 Petitioner for presentation to the proper court. Needless to state that the Respondent has no objection to the Petition being returned for presentation to the proper court and since its divisional office is situate in Pune district, the objection to Territorial jurisdiction of the court at Pune, will not be raised. However, the competent court can always consider the request of the Petitioner to give him benefit of Section 14(1) of the Limitation Act, 1963, while his request for condoning the delay is being considered. The Petition is returned to the Advocate of the Petitioner for presentation to the proper court. 3. All the authorities concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J).