Crl.R. No. 2491 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.R. No. 2491 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.9.2010 ... Seema and another ................Petitioners vs. State of Haryana .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for the petitioners ... K.C. Puri, J. This is a revision petition against the order dated 19.8.2010 (Annexure P-2), vide which the further cross examination of 4 PWs has been declined. Notice of motion to Advocate General, Haryana. On the asking of the Court, Ms. Shalini Atri, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice. After hearing counsel for both the sides, I am of the considered view that accused should have been allowed opportunity to cross examination. The reason given for not cross examining the witnesses is that counsel was not feeling well. So, in these circumstances, the impugned order stands set Crl.R. No. 2491 of 2010 -2- aside to the extent vide which further cross examination of 4 PWs has been declined. Remaining part of the order is upheld. The petitioners be given one opportunity to cross examine all the four PWs. The petition stands disposed of. ( K.C. Puri ) 13.9.2010 Judge chugh