IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.265 of 2005. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.265 of 2005. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.265 of 2005. IN IN IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 100 OF 1991. SECOND APPEAL NO. 100 OF 1991. SECOND APPEAL NO. 100 OF 1991. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Shri S.M.Railkar for the Applicants. CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED : 5th April, 2006. DATED : 5th April, 2006. DATED : 5th April, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate appearing for the Applicant. Office noting shows that the Respondent No.1(a) and 1(c) are represented by an Advocate and appearance of the said Advocate is shown on the cause list. The learned Advocate for the Applicant says that Respondent No.1(b) has been duly served and affidavit of service has been accordingly filed yesterday. The statement is accepted. There is no reply filed by any of the Respondents controverting the averments made in the paragraphs Nos.3 and 4 of the application. In view of this position, Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (bi), and (c). Apology tendered by the Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant is accepted. Amendment to be carried out within a period of four weeks. Judge. Judge. Judge.