1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application (A.P.P.A.) No.803/2010 in Criminal Appeal No.132/2010 ( Shakil Ahmed S/o Kamal Ahmed Siddiki & others ..V/s.. State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Ghuggus, Police Station Ghuggus, Dist. Chandrapur ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. A.R. Wagh, Adv. for applicants. Mr. T.A. Mirza, Adv. for respondents. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI,J. DATE : 26th November, 2010. 1. Heard both sides. 2. It is clearly seen from para no.13 of judgment passed in Criminal Appeal 132/2010 that a categoric finding is recorded that all accused were wrongly charged for the offence u/s.489-D. In the result accused No.1 was also to be benefitted by said finding. 3. Omission of inclusion of name of accused No.1 in para No.14 is thus a ministerial error. 2 4. This Court therefore directs that words “accused No.1 Shakil Ahmed s/o Kamal Ahmed Siddiki” be added in para No.14 of judgment in Criminal Appeal 132/2010 dated 21-7-2010 before words “accused no.2”. 5. Application is partly allowed in terms of para No.4 foregoing. Judge Tambaskar.