IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 251 of 2007 Mohd Iqbal Khan ..Applicant. Vs. Ayub Sultan Khojada & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr Prakash Naik Advocate for the Applicant. Mr U. V. Nikam, A.P.P for the Respondent-State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V. C. DAGA,J. V. C. DAGA,J. V. C. DAGA,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 26th Sept, 2007. 26th Sept, 2007. 26th Sept, 2007. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. Perused record. 3. After having heard and perused orders of both the Courts below, I do not see any perversity in the said orders. 4. The learned counsel for the applicant could neither point out any perversity in the order nor shown exclusion of any particular piece of relevant evidence from consideration. 5. The Courts below have appreciated the evidence in its proper perspective. The view taken by the Courts below is reasonable and [ 2 ] possible view and the discretion has been legally exercised. 6. This Court not being a Court of appeal cannot substitute its own view in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. Revisional jurisdiction is not only limited in scope but also is discretionary. The Court interferes in the revisional jurisdiction only in exceptional cases of flagrant miscarriage of justice as held by the Apex Court in the case of State of Rajasthan v. Gurucharandas State of Rajasthan v. Gurucharandas State of Rajasthan v. Gurucharandas Chaddha, Chaddha, Chaddha, AIR 1979 SC 1895. AIR 1979 SC 1895. AIR 1979 SC 1895. 7. In the above view of the matter, no case is made out to interfere with the impugned orders. In the result, the revision application has no merit. Same is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.)