AB 3540/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Mr. S. U. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. K. M unir, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State respondent. This is an application under Section 438 Cr. P.C. praying for pre-arrest bail in favour of the accused, Shri Dinesh Sharma in Connection with Behali P.S. Case N o. 199/2011 (G.R. Case No. 767/2011) under Sections 468/671 IPC. Perused the case diary. The allegation made against the petitioner is that the complainant. i. e, the in formant as the petitioner applied for furnishing him information from the office of the Boralimara G.P under R.T.I. Act. and in the Peon Book, it has been shown that the informations were furnished to him, whereas according to the informant , he did not receive any information from the office and his signature in the Pe on Book was a forged one. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and the considering the incrimi nating evidence collected by Investigating Officer, I do not find it fit to be c ase to extend the benefit of the pre-arrest bail. Hence, prayer for bail is reje cted. Return the case diary. The A.B. stands dismissed. .