IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47141 of 2008 MD.ANWAR @ MD.ANWAR ALI SON OF MD.MAKBUL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MADHOPUR,P.S.CHHATAPUR,DISTRICT SUPAUL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 17.2.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Initially a complaint case was filed which was referred to police and thereafter present case has been registered for offences under Sections 376,314, 315 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code against this petitioner, his father and one another. The complainant has alleged that she was ravished by the petitioner from seven months prior to the date of report. The petitioner and the complainant established physical relationship which continued unabated on the promise of marriage but the marriage was denied. Thereafter the case has been filed. Submission is that the complainant/informant was consenting party. Further submission is that enmity between the parties from before is reasoning of false implication. There is one counter case bearing Chhatapur P.S.Case No. 148 of 2007 filed by uncle of the petitioner against the father of the informant. There is no explanation of such delay in filing the present case. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in Chhatapur P.S.Case No. 145 of 2007. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)