IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36198 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Bimla Mukim 2. Vivek Mukim @ Vivek Agrawal .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== 2 09-11-2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 346, 420 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. The present complaint was instituted on 22.11.2010 alleging that the complainant’s father has been kidnapped by the accused persons on 13.08.2010 who has compelled to execute the sale deed on 26.08.2010. Initially the petitioner was not made accused but subsequently, he was also sought to be implicated as an accused in the complaint with the accusation that in spite of the injunction passed in partition suit, sale deed was got executed by applying force. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that they were not aware about the title suit and serious litigation being going on whereas others have been granted bail vide Annexure-2 series. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Katihar in connection with Complaint Case No. 3248/2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Let the petitioners make necessary correction in the petition. Amrendra Kumar/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)