WP(C) 261/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE. BD AGARWAL By this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the United C ommercial Bank, who was opposite party in Complaint cases in the District Consum er Forum, Cachar at Silchar, is challenging the order dated 20.5.2010 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Assam, Guwahati in C.A. No. 80 /99. By the impugned order, the State Commission has dismissed the ap peal for non prosecution. It may be mentioned herein that the bank has filed af oresaid appeal against the judgment dated 29.9.1999 passed by the District Forum . Heard Mr. J. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. SP Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No.6 to 15. Also heard Mrs. HM Phukan, learned Jr. Govt. Advocate for the State respondents. The learned counsel for the private respondents submitted that a n order passed by the State Commission can be challenged before the National Com mission under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The above apart, in the order dated 9.7.2010 passed by the Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Red ressal Commission, New Delhi in the case of M/s Advance Scientific Equipment. Ld & Anr -Vs- West Bengal Pharma & Photochemical Dev & AN, it has been held that t he High Court should not entertain any petition against the judgment of the Cons umer Forum or State or National Commission since appropriate effective remedies are available in law itself. In the present case, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the order of State Commission, it may approach the National Commission. In the result, I do not find any merit in this writ petition and the same stands dismissed. Interim order, if any, passed earlier stands vacated.