(1) CRI.APP. 4651.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4651 OF 2010 1. Shrimant S/o Rangnath Gavhane 2. Dattatraya S/o Ramrao Gavhane 3. Satish S/o Ramrao Gavhane All R/o Mungi, Tq. Shevgaon, Dist. Ahmednagar .. Applicants VERSUS The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ... Mr. N.B. Narwade, Advocate for the Applicants Mr. N.H. Borade, APP for the respondent-State ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 23RD NOVEMBER, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. Heard learned Advocate. 2. The Application is for anticipatory bail. 3. The name of the applicants is stated in the FIR as the persons who were indulging in excavation of the sand from riverbed abutting land gat no.694. The learned Advocate for the applicants would submit that since the ships of sand, boat and other articles are seized, custodial interrogation of the applicants (2) CRI.APP. 4651.2010 may not be necessary. He would submit that without considering the reply of the applicants, the FIR was lodged and the applicants are likely to be humiliated due to the arrest. It appears that on basis of legal enquiry, it was found that the machine operated boat was being used by the applicants for excavation of the sand. The reply submitted by the applicants, whereby they denied the liability, cannot be taken into account at this juncture. 4. No substantial case is made out to infer concoction of the charge against them. The Application is therefore dismissed. Sd/- [V. R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp