1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CAO NO. 429/2010 IN MCA (Rev) ST. NO. 5309/2010 IN REJ. LPA NO. 143/2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3637 OF 2007 (Pandurang Laxman Ujawane vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JUNE 10, 2010. Heard Shri Siras, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Jaiswal, learned AGP for respondents No. 1 & 2. Shri Jaiswal, learned AGP points out that there are no just and sufficient reasons to condone the delay. However, the applications for restoration as also for condonation of delay are supported by personal affidavit of the advocate and delay is of three days. The reason given is, the office of the learned counsel did not mark the matter in daily board. I do not find any malafides. Hence, delay is condoned. Application allowed. The office to register MCA. In view of the orders passed above, the prayers made in MCA stand granted. LPA St. No. 1304 of 2010 (LPA No. 143 of 2010) is restored back to file. The applicant shall remove all objections in LPA by 30th 2 June 2010. If the objections are not removed, the LPA shall stand dismissed automatically without reference to Court with cost of Rs.1,200/- to High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Nagpur. JUDGE *GS.