1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2622/2008 IN WRIT PETITION No. 87/2008 (Municipal Council, Bhandara Vs. State of Mah. & ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : APRIL 22, 2008. Heard Mr. Parchure for the petitioner, Mr. Thakre, A.G.P., for the respondent nos. 1 and 2, and Mr. Paliwal for the respondent no.3. The respondent no.3 has moved the Civil Application No. 2633/2008 for speaking to minutes in respect of the order dated 10/3/2008. The learned counsel for the respondent no.3 states that there are two typographical errors occurred in the order. In the order, plot number is mentioned as “183” in stead of “188”, and the date of the notification which is mentioned in the order is “29/12/1969” in 2 stead of “29/12/1960”. These facts are not disputed by the respective counsel for the parties. In the circumstances, the plot number in question be treated to be “188” and the date of notification be treated as “29/12/1960”, in the order dated 10/3/2008. With these clarification, civil application is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE RMP