Page No. ...i ^ •••»••«-> !<»•• ^, IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION No_. /.^^'2-OF 2001 UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA E'ETITIONER :- ONDENTS :- 1 vs Kaleshwar Ram ,s/o Daleshwar Ram aaed 32 years,r/o Ankira (Vill. & P.O.), Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh). Commissioner,(Revenue),Bilaspur Divisi&n Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur Chhattisgarh. S.D.O.(Revenue), Kunkuri District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh). ^, ^o' V-^- '....A^! M 1-Bi ^i,^^^ N1^11^111 •3iK'-?T ^l fSFiRT 3?I^?1 ''CTwnfei ^vS, ^liflcjij, ^rilyiltj, t^TRPp; //^-/ W.P.NO.1442/2001 ^^ ^l^l^ ""-""3' •H1. 3TR?[ sTaIW :!:rit?f "\ Bak^hi Heard shri Alok petitioner and Shri Gautain State. 'fil'W?!^ 'afiRfr •? f3T3t Ttfep ^ scr-^v. s'n^i .hi, leacnad Gounsal for the Bhadhurl, learned G.A. for the O R :| D E , R Tbe petition is fij.jsd taking grie*ance as regards the Interl.ia order npt allo^ing g.tehe writ pefcAtioner to eontinue as Sarpanch. goijag through the pleadlngs and o£ tooth the aides, I am of sjiould be decided l.Bunediately by the Conaissi.oaer -• respjandent no.l before whom ths After carefully also after heartag eounael the view that the matt.er appeal Is pending. Shri Al&k Bakshi, 1^arned counsel for the patitioaer that in fact till jtfais date the petitioner has not ovec the charge to ^ny one. Iherefore, it 1s sulani- that the petitioner sjiould be S2!lew®dto funetion as untXl the appaal y.s disposed of by the Connlssioner. It appears that to t>ass an interim order, at this may not serve the pfu-pose, However, I aia definiitely i ["qt^ ^f<^ 3^^.^ I^TiEF 3IR~?I sn^T ~v^fi (^c^s^s) 3Ti^5I'E^IW ^ftTI ^i^41-]'iTro?ff'^fsT^t'rfSri •^ srf^ sil^il «•s& »• of the opi^ion that evejn though it bas been stated that the matter is flxejd for hearing some-time in November, ifc should be ^ieard iamediately by Issuing notices to the parties.i In order to settle the raatter immediately, let| the CoinnissloneF hear the parties and d.i.spose of jthe matter fiaally by 31/l0/2'801 and not lateerthan thatj date. I ani*»asise that ttie ,t3^<-^ Coianissionac shall shal|l, notlces to the parties imme- diately on recej.pt o£ t^is order. Withnthe abovs o|bservatlons and dlreetions, this petition 1s dtopos^d q£« Sd/- ChiefJustice