THE HONBLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.13718 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: The petitioner seeks a declaration that the notification published under Section 4(1) Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, "the Act") on 18.7.2007 for acquisition of the land belonging to the petitioner under “Indiramma Programme Phase-I” is arbitrary and illegal. However, it is relevant to note that pursuant to the said notification Award was passed and the petitioner was also served with notice under Section 12(2) of the Act. Hence, it is not open to the petitioner to question the notification under Section 4(1) of the Act at this stage. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. 02.07.2008. Kgr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.13718 of 2008 Between: S.A.L.Satyavathi W/o.Achi Reddy, aged about 35 years, R/o.Natta Rameswaram Village, Penumantra Mandal, W.G. District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue (Land Acquisition) Department, Represented by its District Collector, West Godavari District, Eluru. 2 The Land Acquisition Officer & Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovvuru, W.G. District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the entire records of Order bearing Roc.No.G4/274/2006(SW) dated 18-07-2007 of the 1st respondent herein and quash the same by declaring it as arbitrary, illegal, capricious and contrary to the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act and direct the respondents to restore the land to the petitioner forthwith and pass such other orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following: