Writ Petition No. 1780 (SS) of 2005 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Misc. Application No. 5107 of 2006 Interim Relief Application No. 10676 of 2005 Heard Sri I.P. Gairola, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned standing counsel for the State of Uttaranchal on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsel for both the parties have submitted that writ petition be disposed of at this stage. On 01.12.2005, four weeks time was granted to learned standing counsel to file counter affidavit. Learned counsel for both the parties have submitted that the controversy raised by means of present writ petition has been squarely covered by the judgement and order dated 06.08.2004 passed in Writ Petition No. 1377 (SS) of 2003 (Umapati Bhatt Vs. State of Uttaranchal & others) consequently, the writ petition be decided on the same terms and conditions mentioned in the aforesaid judgement. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is finally disposed of on the same terms and conditions of judgement and order dated 06.08.2004 passed in Writ Petition No. 1377 (SS) of 2003 (Umapati Bhatt Vs. State of Uttaranchal & others). Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (M.M.Ghildiyal, J.) 10.05.2006 S.K.S