WP(C) 2884/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. SARMA Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.Ahmed, learned Standing Couns el for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner as projected in this writ petition is that he wa s entrusted with certain contractual works by the respondent authority i.e. the respondent No. 5/the Executive Engineer, Irrigation, Dhubri which was according to the petitioner, has been successfully executed. To that affect an amount of Rs. 73,452/- is still due to the petitioner on account of execution of such cont ractual works. It is contended that in spite of repeated requests failed to evo ke any response of the respondent authorities and the aforesaid amount has not b een paid to the petitioner by the respondent authorities, he has approached this Court by filing this writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similar nature of cases as a gitated by the present petitioner have been dealt with by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of (Tamsher Ali & Others -vs.- State of Assam & others) repor ted in 2008(4) GLT 1. In view of the aforesaid submission and upon hearing learned counsel for the par ties, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the case of the petitioner shall be dealt with by the respondents in terms of the directions and observations made in the case of Tamsher Ali (supra), as referred to above, and similar reliefs granted to the petitioners in the aforesaid case shall also be granted to the present petitioner as entitled under the law and as per the ratio laid down in the case above referred. With the aforesaid directions this writ petition stands disposed of.