IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25584 of 2010 SANTOSH PASWAN, SON OF MUNNI PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report nor has any recovery been made from his possession and he has not been put on Test Identification Parade and is in custody since 20.1.2009, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. 5, Nalanda at Biharsharif, in Sessions Trial No. 115 of 2009 arising out of Bihar P.S. Case No. 180 of 2005 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the mother of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at 2 liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. It has been specifically stated that the petitioner was an accused in two other cases but had been acquitted in both of them. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)