$- 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 571/2010 & CRL.M.A. NO. 15161/10 (stay) 15162/10 (delay) SALEK CHAND .Petitioner Through: Ms. Rajni Kant, Adv. versus STATE Respondent - Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.L.BHAYANA ORDER % 16.09.2010 This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner under section 397/ 401 Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. and read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India with the prayer to set aside the order dated 21.5.2010 passed by learned trial Court in case Nb. SC/11/10 under FIR No. 23/2008, P.S. Vivek Vihar, under Section 3 (1) (X) SC/ST (P.O.A.) Act. The brief facts of the case are that on a complaint of the petitioner an FIR No. 23/2008 was lodged by the police under Section 3 (1) (X) SC/ST (P.O.A.) Act. Learned trial Court after hearing arguments passed the impugned order in which he has held that police had recorded the statement of one Rakesh Sharma stating that he had ED Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified seen accused Deepak Sharma talking with Virender Kumar Sharma sometime before the incident who has been uttering the word that "sala Salek Chand belongs to chude chamar caste, there was no need to fear from him, he will kill him and he will not care." Learned trial Court further held that there is no evidence on record to show that these words were spoken by the accused person in public place. Moreover, there is no statement on record alleging that Rakesh Sharma had informed Salek Chand, petitioner/ complainant that k1_—acc used Deepak Sharma had uttered the aforesaid words against him. I have gone through the impugned order passed by learned trial Court. I do not find any infirmity in the order passed by learned trial Court. Dismissed. SI. B HAYANA,J SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 kb