IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.185 of 2009 BABARI MAHTO & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 2 20.3.2009 KHAN Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 21.1.2009 passed by the Additional District Judge, F.T.C.No.II, Lakhisarai by which petition filed on behalf of the accused under section 227 Cr.P.C. for discharge has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is a case and counter case and there is general allegation that all the accused persons with intention to kill, assaulted Gita Devi on her head with lathi. He submits that the injury sustained by Gita Devi is simple in nature. It appears from the order of learned Sessions Judge that apart from Gita Devi one Asha Devi and Ram Pravesh, grand son of the informant, were also sustained injuries. Learned Sessions has observed that the injuries caused to Gita Devi and Asha Devi would have been dangerous to lives. It is well settled in the case of State of Bihar Vs Ramesh Singh, 1977 SC 2018 that charge can be framed on strong suspicion also. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed. However, it will be open to the petitioners to raise all these points in course of trial that no case under section 307 of the Penal Code is made out against them. (S.P.Singh,J)