IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. SECOND APPEAL NO. 1577 OF 2001. (Old No. 824 of 1982) Ms Ranveer Singh Bal Kishan. ….. Appellant. Versus U.P.Rajya Vidyut Parishad. .….. Respondent. HON’BLE RAJESH TANDON J. Second appeal has been transferred from Allahabad High Court. None appears for either party. I have perused the record of the case. The suit for permanent injunction has been filed not to recover a sum of Rs.4086.00. The suit was decreed. The defendant aggrieved by the aforesaid order has preferred the appeal. The appeal has been allowed. The appellate court has found that the plaintiff has not even proved anything about his consumption of the electric power in April to July and there was no material to show that the bill was illegal. The appellate authority has found that the assessment being not illegal, the realization of the amount can very well be made by the defendant. In view of the aforesaid facts, I find no substantial question of law in the second appeal. The second appeal is dismissed. Dated : August 19 ,2004. S.S.Negi. (Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon J.)