1 D.B.Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.164/2009 Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur V/s Babu Lal Sharma and anr. 10.11.2010 Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Mr.Arun Mishra Hon'ble Mr.Justice Mohammad Rafiq Mr.Arun Sharma for the appellant. Mr.Govind Gupta for the respondents. Delay of three days' in filing this appeal is condoned for the reasons given in the application under section 5 of the Limitation Act supported by affidavit. Heard on admission. The award passed by the Labour Court-First, Jaipur was assailed by way of filing writ application before the Single Bench. The award was passed by the Labour Court on 19.1.2006. Retrenchment of the workman was found to be illegal and void on due consideration of materials which were placed on record. From the muster rolls as well as vouchers, it was found that workman has rendered the services including off-days for more than 240 days' in the preceding year and thus, it was necessary to comply with the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act and compliance having not been made, retrenchment was held to be illegal and void. Reinstatement was ordered without back wages. The Single Judge has dismissed the writ application. Aggrieved from that, this intra-court appeal has been preferred. 2 We have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. We are satisfied that the award passed by the Labour Court is in accordance with law. Material details have been referred to and on consideration of muster-rolls and vouchers it was found that the workman has rendered services for more than 240 days' in the preceding year and thus, retrenchment without complying with the provisions of Section 25F of ID Act was rightly held to be illegal and void. Back wages have not been granted. Consequently, we find no ground to interfere with the findings of fact recorded by the Labour Court and this intra-court appeal is hereby dismissed. (Mohammad Rafiq)J. (Arun Mishra)Acting C.J. Parmar