WP(C) 849/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. S.K. Sarkar, learned counsel for the petitioner as wel l as Ms. M. Hazarika, learned Sr. Counsel, assisted by Ms. J. Hazarika, learned counsel for the respondent corporation. I have also heard Ms. R. Chakraborty, le arned Additional Sr. Govt. Advocate, State of Assam. The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure-5 letter dated 11.2.1011 , by which his registration as Class-1(A) Contractor of the respondent/corporati on has been suspended with immediate effect until further order. The grievance of the petitioner is that before cancellation of t he registration without assigning any reason thereof, the petitioner was not pro vided with any opportunity of being heard. Ms. Hazarika, learned Sr. Counsel for the respondent/ corporatio n submits that the suspension of the registration of the petitioner was with a v iew to take further follow up action by way of issuing show cause notice etc. If there was contemplation to issue show cause notice to the pet itioner in the matter, before issuance of such show cause notice, the registrati on of the petitioner as a Class-1(A) contractor could not have been suspended an d that too without putting the petitioner to any kind of notice. In view of the above, Annexure-5 letter dated 11.2.2011 stands i nterfered with. However, such interference will not preclude the respondent/ cor poration to proceed with the matter in accordance with law and following the due procedure. Writ petition is disposed of.