IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.229 of 2011 Sant Lal Pandit, S/O-Uttam lal Pandit Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04 05.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in Marauna P.S. Case No. 87 of 2009 which has been lodged on the basis of statement of father of the petitioner who states that after committing the murder of his wife and son, petitioner confessed his guilt before him. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except Investigating Officer and Doctor almost all the witnesses have already been examined. In view of the aforesaid circumstance, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Marauna P.S. Case No. 87 of 2009 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 91 of 2010, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-IV, Supaul, stands rejected. However, learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-IV, Supaul is directed to take all possible steps to ensure the attendance of Investigating Officer and Doctor so that their depositions could be recorded and furthermore, the concerned court shall conclude the trial of the petitioner as early as possible. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)