1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 89/2010 IN PUBLIC INTERET LITIGATION NO.85/2008. Maharashtra Rajya Magasvargiya Vidhut Karmachari Sanghtana -: VERSUS :- Shri Arvindsingh Managing Director, M.S.E.T.C.Ltd. And another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 07, 2010. Heard Shri A.S. Kilor, learned Counsel for Petitioner and Shri D.M. Kale, learned Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2. I do not find anything in orders of this Court dated 29.04.2009 in Public Interest Litigation No.85/2008 or then the final orders dated 09.12.2009 passed therein making it obligatory for independent entities like Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd., also to abide by the High Court directions. The learned Counsel has contended that various resolutions issued by the 2 State Government and decision taken by the Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission itself accept that said High Court order is binding on it and must be implemented. He points out that in violation of this government resolution and High Court directions, appointments have been made on 03.11.2009 and 27.11.2009. As I do not find any High Court orders commanding said company to abide by its directions, it is apparent that no case for taking cognizance of any contempt is made out. However, if there is any independent policy decision or government resolution, which binds the respondents, petitioner is permitted to take appropriate measures for ventilation of its grievance in relation thereto. With that liberty to petitioners, Contempt Petition is disposed of. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.