IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 2ND AUGUST 2010 / 11TH SRAVANA 1932 SA.No. 232 of 1996(E) ------------------------------- AS.2/1989 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD OS.80/1984 of MUNSIFF COURT, CHITTUR .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENTS 1 & 2/ DEFENDANTS 1 & 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MANI, S/O. SUBRAMANIAN, SOIL VESSELS WORKER, RESIDING IN KANNUR PADAM, PALLASSANA AMSOM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. THATHA, W/O. MANI, RESIDING AT DO. DO BY ADV. SRI.O.RAMACHANDRAN NAMBIAR SMT.N.SUDHA RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANTS & RESPONDENTS 3 & 4 /PLAINTIFFS TO 4, 6 TO 8 -----------------------------3RD DEFENDANT & 5TH PLAINTIFFS. 1. KUNJAMMAL, W/O. LATE KARUPPAN, RESIDING AT KANNANUR PADAM, PALLASSANA AMSOM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. VELLACHI, W/O. KESAVAN, RESIDING AT KOTHAMPACK, VADAVANNUR AMSOM, CHITTUR TLAUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. MUTHULAKSHMI, W/O. NARAYANAN, RESIDING AT DO. DO. 4. ANDAPPAN, S/O. LATE KARUPPAN, EMPLOYED IN A SPINNING MILL, RESIDING AT RAMASWAMY NAIDU STREET, MUKODE, PEELAMEDU, COIMBATORE. 5. MEENAKSHI, W/O. NARAYANAN, RESIDING AT TENUR AMSOM, DESOM, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. S.A. NO.232/1996 6. KUMARAN, S/O. LATE KARUPPAN, CONTRACTOR, RESIDING AT PEELAMEDU, COIMBATORE , COIMBATORE DISTRICT. 7. NARAYANAN, S/O. MANI, RESIDING IN KANNANUR PADAM, PALLASSANA AMSOM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 8. CHELLAMMAL, W/O. KRISHNAN, RESIDING AT PEELAMEDU, COIMBATORE, COIMBATORE DISTRICT. R4,5,6 & 8 BY ADVS.SRI.K.P.SREEKUMAR R4, 6 & 8 BY SRI.P.R.VENKATESH SRI.K.S.BHARATHAN, THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/08/2010, ALONG WITH SA NO. 258 OF 1996 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss P.BHAVADASAN, J. ------------------------------------- SA Nos.232 & 258 of 1996 ------------------------------------- Dated 2nd August 2010 Judgment Even though several opportunities were given to the appellants, no steps have been taken by them to implead the legal heirs of the respondents who have expired. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed for non- prosecution. P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sta 2