T.A. No. 312 of 2010 [ 1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH T.A. No. 312 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.10.2010 Aditi Kohli .. Applicant v. Gaurav Kohli .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. R. K. Joshi, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Raman Mahajan, Advocate for the respondent. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Prayer in the present application is for transfer of divorce petition titled as “Gaurav Kohli v. Aditi Kohli” from the court of District Judge, Chandigarh to the court of competent jurisdiction at Gurgaon. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that presently the applicant is residing at Delhi along with her parents. The respondent is also serving at Gurgaon. Divorce petition has been filed by him at Chandigarh. Considering the fact that it is the convenience of the wife, which is to be seen, the divorce petition be transferred to Gurgaon, which is the place where the respondent is serving presently, even though the applicant will have to travel from Delhi to Gurgaon. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that initially the divorce petition was filed at Panchkula. It was only on the objection having been raised by the applicant there that the same was withdrawn and filed at Chandigarh. Now again the objection to the jurisdiction is being taken, may be on a different ground. He further submitted that it is only temporarily that the respondent is assigned some duties at Gurgaon, otherwise his place of posting is at Banglore. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the paper book. Considering the fact that the applicant-wife is residing at Delhi and the respondent is also at present serving at Gurgaon and also that it is the convenience of the wife which is to be considered, in my opinion, it would be in the interest of justice if the divorce petition filed by the respondent at Chandigarh is transferred to Gurgaon. T.A. No. 312 of 2010 [ 2] Let the parties appear before Family Court, Gurgaon on 20.11.2010 for further proceedings. The application stands disposed of accordingly. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 25.10.2010 mk