IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27272 of 2011 Santosh Kumar Singh, Son of Late Suryadeo Singh, resident of village Amiaur Bigha, P.S. Salaiya, District Aurangabad. ---------- Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar -------- Opposite Party -------------- 02. 07/09/2011 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kr. @ Manu learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Lalan Kumar learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act, is named accused in this case with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. to the complainant-informant. Submission is that petitioner intends to resume and continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant-informant, who is his one and only wife and having one female child. To further, strengthen his intention an offer is being made to pay a sum of Rs. 750/- (seven hundred fifty only) per month to the complainant-informant by way of interim maintenance, subject to any order on the point by the competent court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of filing an application before the court below, clearly stating such intention as stated above and begin with the payment, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 49 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation or even on single default in payment, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)