THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI SECOND APPEAL No.29 of 2010 JUDGMENT:- This Second Appeal, under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the sole appellant/unsuccessful defendant, is directed against the decree and judgment dated 29.12.2009 of the learned IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati, passed in A.S.No.59 of 2003, whereby, the learned IV Additional District Judge, while allowing the said appeal, had set aside the decree and judgment dated 09.06.2003 of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tirupati, passed in O.S.No.39 of 1998. 2. Today when the matter is called, learned senior counsel for the sole appellant, who formerly appeared for the sole appellant, submits that he has no instructions from the sole appellant/defendant after the SLP preferred by the respondents/plaintiffs was allowed by the Apex Court and the matter was remanded to this Court. 3. The cause-list shows that notice sent to the sole appellant after remand of the matter to this Court by the Apex Court was served. In fact, the appellant was called absent on 14.08.2015 and hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘For dismissal’ today. Today also, the appellant is absent. 4. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand dismissed. _______________________ M. Seetharama Murti, J 21st August, 2015 Bvv