IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.785 of 2004 RAJBALI THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 20.8.2008 This application has been filed against the order of acquittal of Opposite Parties Nos. 2 to 26 (25 in number). Out of them this application has been dismissed against Opposite Parties Nos. 2 to 7, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17 and 19 to 26 for non-compliance of court’s order dated 5.2.2007. This application is pending only against opposite parties’ nos. 8, 12, 13, 14 and 18. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the main allegation is against Opposite Parties 2 and 3 against whom this revision application has already been dismissed. So far the allegation against the aforesaid Opposite parties 8,12,13,14 and 18 is concerned, they were only members of the mob. There is no specific accusation against them. It is further submitted that the court below after going through the evidence and facts and circumstances of the case has passed the order of acquittal against Opposite Parties including the aforesaid opposite parties 8, 11,12,13,14 and 18. There is no material which requires interference in the order of acquittal by this Court. Considered the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order. Since this application has already been dismissed for default against Opposite Parties 2 to 7, 9,10,11,15,16 and 17 to 26 including the main accused as back as on 5.2.2007 , this Court does not feel inclined to interfere in the impugned order of acquittal dated - 2 - 13.10.2005,so far the aforesaid opposite parties Nos.8,12,13,14 and 18 are concerned. Accordingly, this application is dismissed against the aforesaid opposite parties nos.8, 12, 13, 14 and 18. B.Jha (Ghanshyam Prasad)