wlaa BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) w.P. (S) No. aSc$ of 2010 PETITIONER ‘Ghanshyam Pandre, S/o Shri Komal Singh Pandre, aged about 28 years, R/o - Village—Nagarnar, Tahsil— Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS é’ . 1) State of Chhattisgarh - RESPONDENTS WRIT PETlTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OR MANDAMUS/DIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. Through—The Secretary, Panchayat Departmerit, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, 0.. W9“v 9 AP ex“ MA W93 x‘ W 2) Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, 6g: $6 {fr . Janpad Panchayat, Jagdalpur (C.G.) High Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, Ravi Shankar Uhiversity Campus, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Mwm‘mkm “WWm ‘qi 200 mm (Wm mmm ammm Tumane mmm mm wm avaimm B : Hon’bie Shri Manindra Mo hrivas‘tava 1 ?-06-2010 Shri Somkant Verma, counse! for the petitioner. Heard. The grievance of the petitie er in this petition is that though the petitioner has approached the Hig Power Caste Scrutiny Committee seeking verification of his caste tificate, the committee refueed to accept the atopiication. Learned counsei for the p itioner submits that’the concerned respondent authority required the etitioner for verification of his caste certificate, failing which, his service would be terminated. The petitioner was constrained to approach the Caste Scrutiny Committee, but the Committee is not accepting petition r’s application. ln the circumstance ofthe ca e) it would be proper in the interest of justicel if respondent No.3 is drected to consider the petitioner’s application and take appropriate ecision thereon and pass orders in writing. If the petitioner is still agg ieved, it will be open for him to take recourse to the remedy as may be vailable to him under the law. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner, if coer ve action is taken. With the aforesaid direction, e petition is finally disposed of. h a ,“ ; sai— Judge Manindra Mohan Shrrivas'tava‘ri / S ha S J. r 35