:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.120 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.120 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.120 OF 2007 IN IN IN INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2799 OF 2006 TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2799 OF 2006 TAX APPEAL (L)NO.2799 OF 2006 Penguin Electronics Ltd. ..Applicant Vs. The ACIT, CIR.9(2) ..Respondent Mr.Jitendra Singh i/b.K.Gopal for the Applicant. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, V.C.DAGA, V.C.DAGA, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 3RD APRIL, 2007 : 3RD APRIL, 2007 : 3RD APRIL, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion the Applicant is seeking condonation of 18 days delay in filing the above Appeal. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay in filing the above Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)