IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Civil Writ Petition No. 1061 of 2005. Decided on: 6.5.2008. ________________________________________________________ Jai Dei … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. _____________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’bl Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner : Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate. For Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. Advocate General. For Respondents No. 5 & 6 : Mr. Rajnish Maniktala, Advocate. __________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge. It is jointly stated by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties that the present petition is covered vide the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No. 374 of 2005, titled as Shanti Devi Versus State of H.P. & others decided on 12.6.2007. Consequently, the present writ petition is disposed of with the following directions: i) The petitioner will make the representation to the respondents No. 1 & 2 for inclusion of their names in the list seeking financial package within a period of four weeks from today; ii) The respondents No. 1 & 2 will decide the representation/objections within a period of four weeks thereafter. iii) If representation made by the petitioner is accepted by the respondents No. 1 & 2, the petitioner will be considered for financial package in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge. May 6, 2008. (cr) _________________________________________________________________ Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?