HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.7933 of 2010 Dated: 09-04-2010 Between: Sri. N.C.V. Narasimha Chari. … Petitioner And Sri Arunkumar, Senior Manager (IR), Syndicate Bank, Somajiguda, Hyderabad & others. … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.7933 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed with the following prayer : “to set aside the letters, notarized affidavits and connected documents listed in the annexure to the Charge Sheet No.276/PD:IRD/DA-3, dated 08.12.2009, issued by respondent No.7 to the petitioner to the extent of Sl.Nos.45, 46, 56, 69, 75, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 85, 86, 87, 88, 91 and 92, which were proposed to be relied in the inquiry, dated 19.04.2010, by declaring them as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice”. 2. The petitioner has worked as a Branch Manager in Syndicate bank at its branch in Udayagiri of Nellore District, from 27.05.2006 to 21.05.2008. In the year 2009, disciplinary proceedings were initiated alleging misconduct on the part of the petitioner and he was placed under suspension by proceedings, dated 3rd October 2009. Along with the charge sheet, dated 8th December 2009, a list of documents that are sought to be relied on during the course of inquiry, is also furnished to the petitioner. 3. In this writ petition, it is the case of the petitioner that among the documents, there are certain letters addressed by the borrowers of loan amounts from the Bank, stating that they paid bribe to the petitioner and also alleging misconduct on his part. It is the case of the petitioner that such applications filed by borrowers are not in prescribed form, as such, they shall not be taken into consideration, and he seeks for declaration of such documents as illegal. 4. It is open to the petitioner to raise objections on the documents, when the inquiry is being conducted, but merely because such documents are given along with the charge memo, the petitioner, without participating in the inquiry, cannot seek for the declaration as prayed for. When the complaints are not in accordance with the prescribed form, petitioner as well can raise such objection during the inquiry proceedings, but even before initiation of inquiry, he cannot seek the relief as prayed for. 5. For the aforesaid reasons, keeping it open to the petitioner to raise all his objections during the course of inquiry, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 9th April 2010 ksld/ajr