IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1302 of 2006 SANJEEB KUMAR Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 3. 30.07.08. Petitioner is aggrieved because vide communication dated 30.12.05, the letter of appointment issued in his favour has been withdrawn for the reason indicated in the said communication. It has been categorically stated that he along with 111 other recruits were dispatched for training to Awadi (Chennai) on 26.7.04, but the petitioner abandoned the group and the train and did not report for training with the rest. Though explanation is now offered by producing some medical certificate contained in Annexure-3, but the Court is not convinced with the explanation as cogent so as to allow the petitioner to abandon rest of his group on his own. If the authorities thereafter, decided to withdraw the letter of appointment, they can not be said to have acted in an unreasonable manner. The recruitment relates to the year 2004, it will be unfair to the respondents if the Court directs them to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment when he missed the train/ training four years ago. This writ petition is dismissed. M. Pal. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)