IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1467 of 2009 SONELAL SHARMA, S/O LATE RAMBHAROSH SHARMA, VILL- BIBHUTIPUR, P.S. BIBHUTIPUR, DISTT. SAMASTIPUR, AT PRESENT POSTED AS HEADMASTER, UTTKARAMIT MIDDLE SCHOOL, PARSA, P.S. HATHAURI, DISTT. SAMASTIPUR. -------- Respondent No.4/Appellant Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SAMASTIPUR (BIHAR). 2. THE SUBDIVISIONAL OFFICER, ROSERA, P.S. ROSERA, DISTT. SAMASTIPUR. 3. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER-CUM-CIRCLE OFFICER, SHIVAJINAGAR, P.S. SHIVAJINAGAR, DISTT. SAMASTIPUR. 4. MUNILAL MAHTO, KARAMCHARI SHIVAJEENAGAR PANCHAYAT, PARSA, P.S. HATHAURI, DISTT. SAMASTIPUR. ---------- Respondents/Respondents 5. MAHESH KUMAR, S/O SRI NANDDEV MANDAL, VILL- PARSA, P.S. HATHAURI, DISTT. SAMASTIPUR. --------- Petitioner/Respondent ----------- 3 17.01.2011 Having heard learned counsel for the parties and also taking into account that the observation made in the impugned order dated 5.8.2009 in CWJC No. 9280 of 2009, we are of the opinion that while not interfering with the impugned action and resultant order and relegating the respondent writ petitioner to seek remedy before appropriate Civil Court, the interim protection by the Court by way of restraint cannot extend beyond the period of three weeks in which the suit was to be filed by the respondent writ petitioner. Admittedly, such suit has been filed by the 2 respondent writ petitioner, and therefore, now it will be open for the competent civil court to pass an appropriate order on the injunction petition, inasmuch as, this Court had never intended to grant perpetual injunction by the aforesaid order dated 5.8.2009 in CWJC No. 9280 of 2009. The parties in fact will be always at liberty to seek all sort of remedy before the appropriate Civil Court, where the suit is now pending. With the aforementioned clarification, this appeal is disposed of. Rishi/Kanchan (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)