IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED TillS TIlE 22’ 1) OP JELY. 201 1 BE F () RE THE IION’BLE MR.JPSTICE 13.VPINT() CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10744J2011 BETWEEN: 1. l-{ul4zeppa, 5 o. Durgappa o Duappa Vlug&ol ci Mu!Zol Age: 22 cars. Dee: Sident Ri o. Alamatti ii Marimatti Ta!: Basavana Bage adi, Dist. Bijapur PETITIONER (By Shri Prabhakar A. kulkarni. dv.) AND: The State of Narnatakii I lungund Police Station R1 by Slate Public Prosecutor Circuit Bench, Dharwad RESPONDENT (By Shri Anind k Na va1iirnagt It I-ICC P) This cnminal petition is filed under Section 430 of Cr, P.C seeking to release tht’ p’titioner on bail in respeet of Hun iund P.S.Crime No.1 37’ 201(1 w hi’h has na numbered as S.C .No.2’ 2011 on the file ol the District and Sessions Judge. Bagalkot (or the ollences under Section 302. 1 Q0 R 34 of IPC. This criminal petition coming on for orders this da, the Court made the following: ) 2 ORDSR This petition is filed seeking bail in Ci lint’ No. 1 37, 2010 of Hungund Police Station, which is registered for the offences under Sections 302 and I OQ R ‘w Section 341 of Ilk’, on the basis of a complaint h one Somancith. S/n. Duggappa Shankhad alleging that one Sadasliiv has been murdered b the accused. It is seen that CWs. 10. 11 and 12 arc the e nvitncssc’s to the incident and specific role has been attributed b the ccwitnesscs to the accuscd. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner accused submits that the petitioner has assaulted ith hands and therefore, he is entitled for the bail. 3. It is seen that the prosecution has cited Section 34 of 1k’ and therefore, at this stage, no distinction can be made regarding the overt acts of indi idual at cused. Hence this petition does not survive. Petition is dismissed. Sd/ JUDGE gab