IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7865 of 2010 1. VIJAY PASWAN S/O LATE JANGALI PASWAN R/O VILL.- DESHAR BUJURG, P.O. BARKAGAON MANSINGH PATTI, P.S.- BUXAR INDUSTRIAL, DISTT.- BUXAR, PRESENTLY MUKHIA OF GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ UMARPUR ANCHAL, BUXAR, DISTT.- BUXAR--------- ------------------------------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, BIHAR AT PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION BIHAR AT PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BUXAR 4. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER BUXAR 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION BUXAR 6. THE MEMBER DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BUXAR 7. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BUXAR 8. BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER BUXAR 9. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ UMARPUR P.S.- BUXAR INDUSTRIAL, DISTT.- BUXAR 10. HEAD MASTER, PRIMARY SCHOOL MANSINGH PATTI BARKAGAON, P.S.- BUXAR, DISTT.- BUXAR 11. MUNNA JI TIWARY S/O LATE BHUNESHWAR TIWARY R/O VILL.- BARKAGAON MANSINGH PATTI, P.S.- BUXAR INDUSTRIAL, DISTT.- BUXAR------------------RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 24.1.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The finding and adjudication are already there given by the appellate authority. In that background this Court is not enthused to entertain the writ application now filed by the Mukhiya of the Panchayat alleging that private respondent no.11 had forcefully obtained appointment letter and he is continuing on the post of Panchayat teacher. The Court does not want to comment on the bona fide of such writ applications as the Court is not willing to accept the submission and assertion made in the writ applications filed by the Mukhiyas who are known to be real culprit behind all kinds of illegality in appointment and their version cannot be accepted on the face value. This writ application has not merit and it is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)