IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 418 of 2011 Date of decision : August 26, 2011 Meena Malik ....Petitioner versus Bhagat Phool Singh Mahila Vishwavidayalyaya and another ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Rajbir Sehrawat, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Balram Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manak Bakshi, Advocate, for respondent no. 1 L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous because the petitioner was considered for the post in question and has failed in the written test. In view of the aforesaid, as prayed for by counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. ( L.N. Mittal ) August 26, 2011 Judge 'dalbir'