IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30624 of 2008 1) Veena Devi, wife of rakesh Kumar, village Serukahai, PS Kanti, District Muzaffarpur. 2) Khusboo Kumari, wife of Anil, village Balwar, PS Belhar, District Vaishali – Petitioners. Vs. 1) The State of Bihar, 2) Kumari Anuradha, daughter of Devendra Pd. Thulas, Mohalla Kalaimbagh Road Chauk, PS Kazi Mohammadpur, Dist. Muzaffarpur – Opp. Parties. 2 27.6.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, learned A.P.P. representing the State and the counsel for the opposite party. This application has been filed by Veena Devi, married sister-in-law of the complainant Kumari Anuradha and on behalf of minor niece of husband of the complainant. There is an omnibus allegation against all the persons that they had ill treated the victim lady and demanded dowry. As far as these two petitioners are concerned, the allegation is omnibus in nature and in fact there is nothing specific against them. In the circumstances I find that no allegation is made out against the two petitioners who are married sister-in-law and niece of the husband. Counsel for the opposite party submits that the complainant is willing to live with her husband who is a railway employee. It is further stated that she has defect in her leg which has led to the said occurrence. While disposing of this case, this court observes that the trial court or any court where the matter is pending may make an attempt to try and settle the dispute between the husband and wife. 2 However, as far as these petitioners are concerned, the order, dated 3.7.2008 passed by the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Complaint Case No. 870/2008 is hereby quashed. This application is allowed. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)