IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2300 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.5.2010 Jarnail Singh and another .. Petitioners v. Balbir Singh and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: None for the petitioners. .. Rajesh Bindal J. The case was called four times. At the first call, Mr. Gaurav Singla, Advocate appeared and requested for an adjournment. However, the same was declined, as on the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners had sought last opportunity to argue the case. Challenge in the present petition is to the orders passed by the learned court below in an application filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC in a suit filed by the petitioners seeking restrain against the respondents from constructing Chaupal on the land mentioned in the suit which, according to the petitioners, was reserved for construction of Gurudawara in consolidation proceedings. Apparently, the relief claimed in the suit is not personal to the petitioners, rather, in public interest. A suit for the same may not be maintainable as such. However, as learned counsel for the petitioners is not available, though his conduct cannot be appreciated, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 25.5.2010` mk