IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20551 of 2011 Dr.Prof.Mithilesh Kumar Singh son of late Durga Prasad Singh, resident of mohalla Gaushala, Police Station and District Katihar. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Higher Education, Bihar, Patna. 4. Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura. 5. The Registrar, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura. 6. The Vice Chancellor, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura. 7. The Principal, D.S. College, Katihar. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 24.11.2011. Heard Shri Rama Nand Poddar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Arjun Prasad Singh, learned A.C. to S.C.2, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1, 2 and 3 and Shri Abhay Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.4 to 6/B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura. The petitioner, who retired on 31st January,2004 as Professor from D.S. College, Katihar under B.N. Mandal University, has prayed for directing the respondents to pay the following dues : i. Leave encashment Total Paid on Still Dues 31.01.2005 90,296.00 50,000. 40,926.00 2 ii. Arrear of Salary Total Paid in May Still Dues 2011 4,18,317/- 1,67,327/- 2,50,980/- iii. Differences Admitted 7,06,258/- of Salary iv. Differences 1984-1989 32,810/- of salary v. Differences March 1999 to June 2000. of Salary Total Paid Still Dues 71,359/- 63,560/- 7,799/- Differences of Pension vi. Group Insurance for the period of L.N.M.U. (i.e. since 1983 to October 1991)- vii. Gratuity Total Admitted 50% Paid on Still Dues 22.10.2007 3,91,800/- 1,95,900/- 1,95,900/- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the relief sought for in the present writ petition, the petitioner has also filed representation before the authority concerned, but till date, neither any decision has been taken on his representation nor dues have been cleared. The court is of the opinion that writ petition can be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh 3 representation before respondent no.5/Registrar, B.N. Mandal University within a period of six weeks from today regarding the claim made in the writ petition. If such representation is filed, respondent no.5 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no.5 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for clearing all the dues within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.5 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within three months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)