1 Cri-A-3823-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRINMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3823 OF 2010 Hamid Ali Rafique Shaikh & Anr. ... Applicants (Orig. accused Nos.1 & 2) vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Rashik Khan i/b. Mr. V.V.Jain,Advocate, for the applicants Mr.P.S.Hingorani, APP, for the respondent No.1- State. Mr. Amogh Gavhankar, respondent No.2/complainant in person present. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 8th March, 2011. P.C. 1. The applicants are the original accused Nos. 1 and 2 and respondent No.2 is the complainant. On the complaint, offence under Sections 380 and 420 of IPC has been registered. The parties have filed Consent Terms marked "X". As the complainant/respondent No.2 has received whole of the amount as compensation by demand draft, he has no objection to quash the FIR. 2. In view of the consent terms, this application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (J.H.BHATIA,J.)