IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27376 of 2009 MD.SAMIR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 7.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that, though, allegation is about using of force on her once while petitioner indulged in sexual activity with the complainant, but that continued for months and only after pregnancy that was resisted. Rather, a Panchayati was called and assurance was given by this petitioner to marry. Further submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the complainant is married wife of Md.Jakir. He has deserted her without divorce. So, assurance of marriage can never be believed. According to the learned counsel, there was no relation at all and, if any was, then was consented. Even then, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Case 2 No.C.A.1191/2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2)Cr.P.C. SKBOSE (Mandhata Singh)