IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2009 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1931 RPFC.No. 253 of 2006() ------------------------- (M.C.264/05 OF FAMILY COURT, KASARAGOD) .............................. PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------- MOIDEEN, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.ISMAIL, RESIDING AT ODIPURAKODI, VORKADY, KUDAL MOGAR POST MANJESHWAR VIA, KASARAGOD TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER: -------------------------- AYSHA, AGED 28 YEARS, D/O.ISMAIL, W/O.MOIDEEN, RESIDING AT BAITHUL AMAN, MAVINAKKATA, KUMBLA, KASARAGOD TALUK. ADV. SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON FOR R1 THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 3/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P(F.C.) NO. 253 OF 2006 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2009. O R D E R When the matter came up for hearing the learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits before me that as per the orders of the Family Court, the marriage has been declared as null and void and therefore the question of ordering maintenance will not arise. If there are change of circumstances, S.127 Cr.P.C. provides remedy for the party to approach the Court which passed the order to cancel the order. With liberty to do so, this R.P.(F.C) is dismissed. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-