IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16742 of 2011 Siwan Singh . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors . ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Roy,Adv. For the State : Mr.M.N.Roy, A.C. to S.C.25. For B.S.I.D.C. :Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Prasad & Mr.P.C.Jha, Advs. 2. 26.09.2011 Petitioner has moved this Court for allowing dearness allowance which has been declared by the Management for he period mentioned in Para-1 of the writ petition. The petitioner has already superannuated from service. In the light of the order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Justice Uday Sinha Committee was constituted where the grievance of the petitioner was not being redressed. Kamlesh Kumar Singh and others moved before the Committee and the committee ordered for payment of D.A. of the concerned employees. It appears from Para-9 along with Annexure-2 of the writ petition that the petitioner has claimed D.A. as was given in the case of Kamlesh Kumar Singh and others Vs. The State of Bihar and others (C.W.J.C.No.7530 of 2010) in which this Court, vide order dated 3rd May 2010 passed the following order: “Petitioners have retired with effect from 28.2.2002, 31.1.2003 and 31.7.2000. In appreciation of their date of retirement, it is directed that if any of 2 the retired employees has been paid the D.A. which is being claimed by the petitioners, then same should be paid to the petitioners forthwith. In case none of the retired employees has been paid arrears of “D.A., then a list of the retired employees be drawn and they be paid their arrears of D.A. maintaining seriatim as per their date of retirement within a reasonable time, in any case, within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order”. The petitioner is given the liberty file a representation annexing the order of this court before the authority concerned who will dispose of the same in the light of the aforesaid order, if the authorities will find the case of the petitioner identical to that of Kamlesh Kumar Singh, in that circumstance, similar relief shall been granted. The petitioner is a retired employee, as such, it is expected that the authority will consider his case sympathetically and will pass the order within three months from the date of receipt of the representation. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this petition is disposed of. Jay/ (Shivaji Pandey, J)