IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43394 of 2009 ANUJ PRASAD Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SANJU DEVI ----------------- OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 5 24.8.2010 This case has been listed under the heading ‘To be mentioned’ at the instance of the petitioner by filing mentioning slip. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner was allowed anticipatory bail on 9.8.2010 in connection with ‘Complaint Case No. 1386C of 2007’ but in the said order, inadvertently ‘Complaint Case No. 138C of 2007’ has been mentioned though it should have been mentioned ‘Complaint Case No. 1386C of 2007’. The order dated 9.8.2010 is modified to the extent that in the said order ‘Complaint Case No. 1386C of 2007’ be read in place of ‘Complaint Case No. 138C of 2007’. Extension of period of surrender of the petitioner in the court below is allowed further four weeks from the date of communication of this order and he shall be released on bail. Let this order along with order dated 9.8.2010 passed in this case be communicated to 2 the court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)