1 WP-635/11 lgc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.635 OF 2011 Vanita Vasant Sawant : Petitioner versus The Administrator and Divisional Commissioner and ors. : Respondents. Mr. R V Govilkar for the Petitioner. Mr. Mr. A B Ketkar AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 6. Mr. D A Nalawade for Respondent No.2. Ms. V S Gharpure for Respondent No.3. Mr. Phiroz Puniwala i/by Mr. I P D’Cruz for Respondent No.5. CORAM : P B MAJMUDAR & R M SAVANT, JJ. DATE : 07th September 2011 P.C. 1 The appeal filed by the Petitioner before the Administrator and Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division, Mumbai has been disposed of by an order dated 19th January 2011. In terms of the said order, the Petitioner was granted liberty to approach competent authority for determination of her eligibility for commercial premises and it is further mandated that if the Petitioner approaches the competent authority, the competent authority would be obliged to decide the eligibility of the Petitioner for commercial premises. 2 The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner would approach the competent authority of the Municipal Corporation within a period of two weeks from date by making an appropriate application along 2 WP-635/11 with relevant documents on which the Petitioner relies. 3 The Petitioner to therefore approach the concerned competent authority within a period of two weeks from date and, the competent authority would thereafter consider the eligibility of the Petitioner for commercial premises within a period of four weeks from the first appearance of the Petitioner. 4 The learned counsel for the Respondent No.5-Developer states that in the event the competent authority considers the Petitioner eligible for commercial premises, the Respondent No.5 would make available such commercial premises to the Petitioner as per the entitlement of the Petitioner in accordance with law. The learned counsel for the Respondent No.5 further points out that such a statement has already been recorded by Administrator and Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division, Mumbai in the impugned order dated 19th January 2011 which is on page 39 at Exhibit-A of this Petition. 5 The Petitioner would vacate the premises presently occupied by her irrespective of the decision that would be rendered by the competent authority within two weeks of the said decision. In view of the above, no further directions are necessary. The above Petition is accordingly disposed of. [R.M.SAVANT, J] [P.B.MAJMUDAR, J]