IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 12 OF 2011 SHRI. BHAIRUNATH BABURAO HEGDE ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. SHRIRAM H. DHULAPKAR AND ANR., ... Respondents Ms. Maria Malar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D. Gaonkar, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr.C. A. Ferreira, Public Prosecutor for respondent no.2. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 9th September, 2011 P.C. The petitioner and respondent no.1 have filed an application for compounding the offence under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on the terms stipulated in the application dated 9.9.2011. The application has been duly signed by the petitioner as well as respondent no.1 along with their respective learned Counsel. 2. I have heard Ms. Maria Malar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Shri D. Gaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.1 and Shri C. A. Ferreira, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent no.2. 3. All the learned Counsel submit that the above Criminal Revision Application can be disposed of in accordance with the terms stipulated in the said application. As such, the Criminal Revision Application stands disposed of in terms of the said application. 4. In accordance with the said consent terms, the respondent no.1 is permitted to withdraw a sum of Rs.25,000/- deposited before the Assistant Sessions Court at Panaji, in Criminal Appeal No.123/2010. 5. The Criminal Revision Application stands disposed of accordingly. F. M. REIS, J. at*