IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2922 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 2922 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 2922 OF 2005 Hanif Abbas Rakhangi ... Petitioner V/s. Municipal Corp. of Gr. Mumbai ... Respondent and ors. Mr. G.S. Hegde with Mr. R.M. Vanoo for petitioner. Mrs. A.K. Savla for respondent No. 1. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 6th November, 2006 : 6th November, 2006 : 6th November, 2006 P.C. . The petitioner has effective alternate remedy under Section 394(5) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. In the light of that this would not be a fit case to exercise our extra-oridinary jurisdiction. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]