IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2788 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 19th July, 2010 Harchand Singh and another … Petitioners Versus Ashok Kumar and others … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Manu K. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Harit Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 7. None for respondent No.8. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioners has referred to the photographs (Annexure P-4), from which it is apparent that the alleged illegal construction has been removed by the official respondents. There is a dispute regarding the ownership of the property. It is the stand of the Punjab Urban Development Authority that the suit property was purchased from Yadvindra Public School, Patiala vide a conveyance deed dated 10th February, 1976. Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the suit land was purchased by them vide a registered sale deed dated 30th April, 2004. A subsequent purchaser can make no grievance. Both the Courts below have dismissed the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. This Court, while exercising revisional jurisdiction, cannot set aside the view formulated by both the Courts below as balance of Civil Revision No.2788 of 2009 (O&M) convenience is not in favour of the petitioners, as they are subsequent purchasers. Hence, there is no merit in the present revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that the official respondents are not diligent enough and there is every possibility that culmination of proceedings arising out of the suit shall be delayed. To allay this apprehension of the petitioners, trial Court is directed to decide the suit within one year after affording three effective opportunities to both the parties. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE July 19, 2010 rps 2