^—" ^' e^^. ^ % v IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. '2>> 4:^/2003 / PETmONER G.K.Nehaniya, S/o Shri L.N.Nehaniya, ^ aged 46 years, Occupation-SerVice / (presently posted as Labour Inspector at Durg), R/o 120/6, Deepak Nagar, Durg (C.G.) -VERSUS- RESPONDENTS .•••'^•y' ^•yy ^' .^->^ ^/- ^*' / ff^W ^^' / 1. Union of India through Ministry ofPersonnel, Public Grievances & Pensions, Department of Personnel and Training, 3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhavan, Khan Market, NewDelhi-110003. 2. State ofMadhyaPradeshthrough Chief Secretary, Vallabh Bhavan, Bhopal (M.P.) 3. Principal Secretary, State Reorganization Cell (Chhattisgarh Cell),Mantralaya, Bhopal (M.P.) 4. State of Chhattisgarh through Chief Secretary, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 5. Secretary, Labour, Sport and Youth Welfare Department, Govemment of Chhattisgarh^ D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). 6. Slriv Kishor Lodh, Occupatioa- Senrice presently working as Labour Inspector, R/o C/o Assistant Labour Commissioner, Kumahar Para, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) ^, WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 221S/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT. ORDERS OR DIRECTION. -^) XI-HC-22 -^^ ^ji^icri^^ ^Til'H-iKo, t^tray 3^I^T 'q^^ -sTO?ff^TN?"^f"-<3"^-^::-M 2(N)^ •^^sr' , STl^T^T ysCTW^rf^Tf STT^I ^T?H^R Trft^T -^-T^^T HR^f •?tt^ Tf^RZR ^"3tf^m3?I^T c<»un^el 19-12-2003 Shri Indrosen Sahu. Shri Vinay Harit, Sr. Cen^ral for respondent No. 1. Shri Ranbir Slngh, fiwt. and 5. The petitloncr has prefen^ed of the Constitution of Indio, parla of respondents 4 and 6 pctitioner as well as rcspondent ] The pctitionw is working for thc pctitimer. 6ovt. Standirg Counsel takes iwHce ^dwcate tokes notice for respondents 4 b^tng fk»r Chhattli^arh Layour of Labour in the State of No.6 both were cmployed as M.P. After the bifurcation tbe| ChhatHsgarh whereas rcspondenf According to the option given by| the tantaflve final allocation listt the stafe cf M.P.. Due to submitted en flipplication for his the petitioner's application in pe'Htloner was allocated to thej pcrsonal rcason, th^ petstioncr and respondent hto.6 wanted to 'the petitioner and respondent b| this petition under Arttcles 226/227 aggricved by Nie in-oction on th& not deciding the application of the lhto.6 fw mutual ullocallon. |as Labour Incpector in the Deparhnenf i. The p&llttoner and nespondent Inspectw in the erstwhile Stote of pctitioncr hod optcd for thc Statc of No.6 had optcd for thc Stote «rfM.P. the petittoner1 ond respondent No.6 m the req»ondentNo.6 was altocated to Ipersonal reasons, the petitioner had ^hange ef option but without considcring tentotive final allocotion list. the Stote of Chhattisgarh. As, for thc Iwanted to shift fo thc Stute «rf M.P. Ishiftto the Slate of C.6.. therefore. ^.6 both sAmitted an application for tfie XI-HC-22 371^1 ^TT '{^ri^^STT^T ^RW^Tf 1^1 -fc^L ^. v .-Ssf' '^rv ^^ '^t<41d<L!, ^nl^^Ko, ^l^y 3H^T ^^ WH^F^^I^ •M •^^ST' mutual atlocation and on the respondcnt No.6, the hcad respondent No.6 had given a the Prmcipal Secretory, Stat ^^p^ •?:n^ff ^ ftTzt T^RZR ^T ^3Ti^P? 3?I^T lication submltted by the petitioner* and the &ep«iMincnt of the pcttttoncr and no objection and fonrorded Nic same *o Re-organization Cell (Chhattisgarh CelQ Bhopal. A reminder was sent to| req»ondentNo.3 en 26-10-2002 through speed post, but no action is b|ejng taten. Leamed counsel for tl^e petltioner submitted thot he moy be allow&d to wake a represenlhBt^ their mutual request to which| on to the respondent No.l for consideriry thc leamed counsel for rcspondents have no objection, Having heord the lear|wd counsel for the parties ond hoving regerd to the facts and drcu^nstances fo the cdise, the petitioner and rcspondcnt No.6 are anoww^l +e mote a joint rcprcscntotion in a prescribed fomi to the respo^ident No.l within a pcriod of one month fnom tdday and responderit No.l ditwsted to decide the rcpresentation of the pctition^r aml respondent No.6 in accordance with lawr. in a rteasonable time. ncft Inter than 3 monNis from the date of rcccipt of thc reprcsentation.l With these directtons, the w»tpetitlon is disposed of. In view of thia o^er, M.(W.)P. No. 3211/2003 and I.A.No.10156/2003 stwid dis^osed of. Parties are entitled for certified copy of this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ^'