IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4961 of 2008 SANTOSH SAO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 3. 6.8.2008 As prayed for, the learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. No one appears on behalf of opposite party no.2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No.154/2006 for the alleged offences registered under section 498A and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the daughter of the complainant on her own is not residing with the petitioner. As a matter of fact, the petitioner filed an application for restitution of conjugal rights vide paragraph 11 of the petition wherein it is stated that the wife of the petitioner is evading her appearance and thereafter the 2 petitioner took steps for publication of notice. Considering the above, it is directed that petitioner Santosh Sao, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No.154/2006, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)