IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.58 of 1985 SUIT NO.58 of 1985 SUIT NO.58 of 1985 M/s. Patel Glass Corporation ..Plaintiff versus M/s. Time Traders ..Defendant. None present Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 28th Nov., 2005 Dated : 28th Nov., 2005 Dated : 28th Nov., 2005 P.C. 1. The Plaintiff and their Advocate absent when called. From the perusal of the previous order it is very clear that the Plaintiffs were directed to file affidavit of evidence and documents on the next date failing which the suit shall stand dismissed for default. 2. Today also the Plaintiffs are absent. No affidavit filed. 3. Suit is dismissed for default. 4. No order as to costs. (S.R.Sathe, J.)