IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11777 of 2011 1. JAI JAI RAM YADAV 2. SITO YADAV @ SIKO YADAV. 3. PRAHLAD YADAV @ PRAHLAD KR. YADAV. 4. ANGAD YADAV @ ANGAD KR. YADAV. 5. RAM SHARAN YADAV. 6. CHANDRA YADAV. 7. SHATRUGHAN @ SATRUGHAN KR. YADAV. 8. SULO YADAV @ SULENDRA YADAV. 9. AMRENDRA YADAV @ AMRENDRA KR. YADAV. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The specific accusation against Jai Jai Ram and his two sons is to have caused firearm injury to Dilip Singh, whereas, other accused persons alleged to have assaulted the informant. The injury report of Dilip Singh suggests only one swelling injury over the thigh caused by hard and blunt substance. It is submitted that the occurrence took place during the celebration of Ram Dhuni worship. 2 Considering the fact that the injury report does not corroborate the accusation made in the F.I.R., let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Alamnagar (Ratwara) P.S. Case No. 51/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)