HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI CONTEMPT CASE No.1397 of 2011 in WRIT PETITION No.2956 of 2006 Date: November 25, 2011 Between: M. Saroja Devi @ M. Saroja … Petitioner And Satya Babu, Commissioner, Rajampet Municipality, Rajampet, Kadapa District. … Respondent * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI CONTEMPT CASE No.1397 of 2011 in WRIT PETITION No.2956 of 2006 O R D E R: This contempt case has been filed complaining violation of the orders of this Court dated 17.3.2011 in W.P. No.2956 of 2006. 2. The husband of the petitioner approached this Court by filing writ petition W.P. No.2956 of 2006 challenging notices dated 07.2.2006 issued by the first respondent in the writ petition directing the petitioner to remove the alleged encroachments from the house site purportedly belonging to the Gram Panchayat on the ground that the said order was passed without notice. The said order was set aside, as the petitioner was not put to notice and the respondent was given liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law after due notice to the petitioner. However, the respondent issued order on 07.9.2011 again directing the petitioner to remove the encroachments without notice. 3. The respondent is present in response to Form-I notice. In his counter-affidavit filed, even though an effort is made to justify his action, in the additional affidavit filed by him, he has stated that he has issued order dated 07.9.2011 under a mistaken impression and realising the same he has withdrawn the notice. He has also filed copies of the endorsement dated 21.11.2011. 4. It is true that in the first instance the order dated 07.9.2011 was issued which has the effect of violating the orders of this Court passed in the aforesaid writ petition. The respondent, however, has withdrawn the same vide endorsements dated 21.11.2011. He has also expressed unconditional apology for the indiscreet lapse committed by him and seeks pardon. Since the respondent has already withdrawn the order dated 07.9.2011, I am inclined to accept the apology and close the contempt case. 5. The contempt case is accordingly closed. In view of the closure of the contempt case, C.A. No.864 of 2011 is dismissed as unnecessary. ___________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. Date: November 25, 2011. BSB