1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL SIDE JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL SIDE JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL SIDE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.557 OF 2004 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.557 OF 2004 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.557 OF 2004 IN IN IN SUIT NO.3283 OF 1996 SUIT NO.3283 OF 1996 SUIT NO.3283 OF 1996 Ambience Space Sellers Ltd. & Ors. ...Plaintiffs Ambience Space Sellers Ltd. & Ors. ...Plaintiffs Ambience Space Sellers Ltd. & Ors. ...Plaintiffs Vs. Vs. Vs. AASIA Industrial Technologies Pvt. Ltd. AASIA Industrial Technologies Pvt. Ltd. AASIA Industrial Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ...Defendants & Anr. ...Defendants & Anr. ...Defendants ----- ----- ----- Mr. Prateek Sakseria Adv. i/b. Crawford Beyley & Co. Mr. Prateek Sakseria Adv. i/b. Crawford Beyley & Co. Mr. Prateek Sakseria Adv. i/b. Crawford Beyley & Co. for Plaintiffs for Plaintiffs for Plaintiffs Mr. Jaideep Lele Adv. for Defendants 1 & 2 Mr. Jaideep Lele Adv. for Defendants 1 & 2 Mr. Jaideep Lele Adv. for Defendants 1 & 2 CORAM: ROSHAN DALVI, J. CORAM: ROSHAN DALVI, J. CORAM: ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED: 19TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 19TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 19TH DECEMBER, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . This Chamber Summons has been taken out in . This Chamber Summons has been taken out in . This Chamber Summons has been taken out in March, 2004. It is for taking inspection of the March, 2004. It is for taking inspection of the March, 2004. It is for taking inspection of the documents relied upon by the Plaintiffs to file documents relied upon by the Plaintiffs to file documents relied upon by the Plaintiffs to file written statement. Written statement has already been written statement. Written statement has already been written statement. Written statement has already been filed. The Plaintiff’s Advocate contends that filed. The Plaintiff’s Advocate contends that filed. The Plaintiff’s Advocate contends that inspection has earlier been granted to the earlier inspection has earlier been granted to the earlier inspection has earlier been granted to the earlier Advocate of Defendant No.1. Yet he agrees to offer Advocate of Defendant No.1. Yet he agrees to offer Advocate of Defendant No.1. Yet he agrees to offer inspection within 8 weeks from today upon payment of inspection within 8 weeks from today upon payment of inspection within 8 weeks from today upon payment of costs of chamber summons as well as costs of xerox costs of chamber summons as well as costs of xerox costs of chamber summons as well as costs of xerox copies of the documents and tapes. Defendant no.1 copies of the documents and tapes. Defendant no.1 copies of the documents and tapes. Defendant no.1 shall pay costs of this chamber summons fixed at shall pay costs of this chamber summons fixed at shall pay costs of this chamber summons fixed at Rs.300/- condition precedent within one week from Rs.300/- condition precedent within one week from Rs.300/- condition precedent within one week from today. today. today. 2 . If the costs are paid the Plaintiff’s Advocate . If the costs are paid the Plaintiff’s Advocate . If the costs are paid the Plaintiff’s Advocate shall supply a compilation of the copies of the shall supply a compilation of the copies of the shall supply a compilation of the copies of the documents as well as the tapes required by the first documents as well as the tapes required by the first documents as well as the tapes required by the first Defendants within 7 weeks thereafter upon the Defendants within 7 weeks thereafter upon the Defendants within 7 weeks thereafter upon the Defendants paying costs of xeroxing the documents and Defendants paying costs of xeroxing the documents and Defendants paying costs of xeroxing the documents and the costs of the tapes. the costs of the tapes. the costs of the tapes. (ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (ROSHAN DALVI, J.)