IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.53932 of 2007 DILIP YADAV @ TALEWAR YADAV & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 06.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are accused for offences punishable under sections 364, 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation is that the husband of the informant went towards village Kairi but he did not return and after enquiry it was found that he had not gone to village Kairi. Therefore, the informant had suspicion that the accused persons including the petitioners had kidnapped him as they had strained relationship. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that after four months some women of the village had stated that they saw the deceased with the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners also avers that the said statements were clearly made as an after thought merely to implicate the petitioners, although they had not committed any such offence and there was no material at all to show that the petitioners were involved in any such offence. Learned counsel for the petitioners further contends that the petitioners are in custody since 12.07.2007. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed. Let petitioners, namely, Dilip Yadav @ Talewar Yadav and Kamal Yadav @ Kamlesh Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand)each with two - 2 - sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 11 of 2007. harish (S.N. Hussain, J.)