IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 2ND JANUARY 2009 / 12TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 190 of 2009(V) ------------------------ PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. ALPHONSE, S/O.THOMAYAR, AGED 60 YEARS, KULAMUTHAN HOUSE, CANAL PIRIVU,PAMPAMPALLAM.P.O, PALAKKAD. 2. MUTHUSWAMY, S/.O.THOMAYAR,AGED 53 YRS, KONGAMPARA, KOZHIPPARA, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, PALAKKAD. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PUTHUSSERI EAST VILLAGE, PALAKKAD. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No.190 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT The complaint in this writ petition is that though Exhibits P5 to P7 applications have been made, the possession certificates have not been issued by the 3rd respondent. The petitioners stated that in view of delay on the part of the 3rd respondent , they had even complained to the first respondent, and that even thereafter, there is no progress in this matter. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners preferred this writ petition . Having regard to the case of the petitioners that orders have not been passed on Exhibits P5 to P7 applications made by them for possession certificates, this writ petition is disposed of directing that the 3rd respondent shall consider and pass orders on the aforesaid applications as expeditiously as possibly at any rate within four weeks from the date of production of copy of this judgment . The petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 3rd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm