IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 15776 of 2008. Decided on: 4th July, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Brij Lal Sharma. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 4. : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. None for respondents No. 5 and 6. S.D.M., Theog present in person. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): In sequel to order dated 30th June, 2011, the S.D.M.(C), Theog has produced the record. Record seen and returned. 2. Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No. 6 to the post of Primary Assistant Teacher in Government Primary School, Mail, Tehsil Kotkhai, District Shimla. Petitioner has secured 52.62 marks and the selected candidate, i.e., respondent No. 6 has secured 53.5 marks. Petitioner has been given additional marks for possessing the qualification of B.A.. The suitability of the petitioner vis-à-vis respondent No. 6 has been determined by a duly constituted 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - selection committee. In these circumstances, this Court will not sit in appeal over the recommendations made by a duly constituted selection committee. Moreover, no malafides have been alleged either against the Chairman or the Members of the selection committee. 3. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 04, 2011. (bhupender) - 3 - `