v" $1M€£i£ %3ENW § IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.ls)N0. AZHET I2o11 v". / PETITIONER z Rameshwar Choudhary, S/o Budhan Choudhary, aged about 36 years, working as Panchayat Sachiv of Gram Panchayat Kakna, R/o Village Kakna, Block Rajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : f State of Chhattisgarh—' Through :- The Secretary, Panchayat Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Satnam Singh S/o Kundur Ram, aged about 22 years, appointed as Panchayat Secretary of Gram Panchayat Kakna, R/o Village Kakna, P.S. Dhourpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. r fa? , /7 MN HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAEPUR B : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER W.P.[Sl.NO. 6245i 201 1 PETITIONER Rameshwar Choudhaxy VCI‘SHS State of C.G. 6r. Othexs Shri Ajay Kumar Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Shn' Ghandresh Shn‘vastava, PL. for the State] respondents. e ORDER (19.10.201 1) Counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petiu’on with Hberty to me appeal, He however submits that dixectjon may be issued to the appellate authority for deciding the appeal on merits. State counsel submits that if the petitioner prefers any appeal the same would be hopelessly haned by limitation and therefore no order be passed in favour of the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as Withdrawn. In the eventuality of ming any appeal by the petitioner, the same would be 'decided in accordance with law. M It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. Sd/4 J l i Pritinker Diwaker £ Judge LR S