THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA WRIT PETITION No.9901 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the second respondent in allowing the application filed by the fourth respondent- temple to condone the delay of 1244 days in filing Appeal No.49 of 2006 vide order dated 23.04.2008. It has been averred that the application filed for condonation of delay has been allowed by the competent authority without being numbering the application and without giving opportunity to the petitioner to contest the same. Sri V.T.M.Prasad, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the fourth respondent-temple submits that during the pendency of this writ petition, Appeal No.49 of 2006 itself has been allowed in favour of the temple. He further submits that against allowing of the said appeal, the petitioner has preferred W.P.No.11188 of 2008 and the same was dismissed along with batch of writ petitions on 06.09.2008. In view of the fact that Appeal No.49 of 2006 has already been decided by the competent authority against which the petitioner has filed W.P.No.11188 of 2008 and the same was dismissed, therefore, I find no merit in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. Ashutosh Mohunta, J Date: 14.12.2010 va