IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY WRIT PETITION No.24158 OF 2007 Between: S.Balakista Goud and six others. … Petitioners AND The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Nampally, Hyderabad and four others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri M.Damodar Reddy Counsel for the respondents: GP for Prohibition & Excise. This Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction on the part of respondents 1 to 3 in considering representation dated 29-10-2007 of the petitioners, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that after filing of the Writ Petition, the representation of the petitioners was considered and action was initiated against respondents 4 and 5 and that, therefore, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. -------------------------------------- C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J. DT.24-3-2008 MNR