IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35649 of 2009 Renu Devi, wife of Laxmi Kant Sharma, resident of village- Jinpura, P.S- Bihta, Distt- Patna. ……..Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Baljit Sharma @ Kunt Bihari Sharma, son of Late Hridya Narayan Singh, resident of village- Jinpura, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna. …Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 09.11.2011 The informant-petitioner has preferred this application against the order dated 31.08.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, XIII, Patna in Bihta P.S. Case No.271/2007, G.R. No.2638/2007 by which the opposite party no.2 has been granted bail. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that after grant of bail to the accused opposite party no.2, he (the opposite party no.2) has started torturing the informant and has been pressing her not to contest the case and threatened has also been given by him that her child will be killed. The learned counsel for the State submits that the opposite party no.2 has been granted bail by the impugned order dated 31.08.2009 and more than two years have passed. The petitioner may raise her grievance before 2 the learned trial court where the trial is pending. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State, it appears that the contention of the learned counsel for the State is correct. The petitioner is at liberty to raise her grievance before the learned trial court where the opposite party no.2 is facing trial. With this observation, this application stands disposed of . V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)