IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3299 of 2009 Between: Upparpalli Narasimha ..... Petitioner AND The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad & others. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Ms. M. Shilpa Rao for Sri V. Srinivas Counsel for respondents 1&2: AGP for Home Counsel for respondents 3&4: AGP for Revenue Counsel for respondent No.5: Sri C. Damodar Reddy The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3299 of 2009 ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to direct respondent Nos.1 and 2 to act in accordance with law by providing police protection in terms of orders dated 23.01.2009 in I.A.No.44 of 2009 in I.A.No.726 of 2007 in O.S.No.8008 of 2007 on the file of VI Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. At the hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in pursuance of the detailed order passed on 27.02.2009 in WPMP.No.4291 of 2009 by this Court, the respondents have granted police protection to the petitioner and that as the said order has worked itself out, no further adjudication of the Writ Petition on merits is necessary. Having regard to the above submission of the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.4291 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 15.04.2011 ES