CW-2099/08-M/s Harish Brothers Vs. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti,Udaipur & Ors. & 9 Other connected writ petitions. Judgment dt.10.12.2009 1/3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT 1. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2099/2008 M/s Harish Brothers Vs. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti,Udaipur & Ors. 2. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7766/2007 Bhanwar Lal Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. 3. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7786/2007 M/s Narendra Trading Co. Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. 4. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7787/2007 M/s Jain Agarwal Trading Co. Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. 5. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7788/2007 M/s Mohan Thok Bhandar Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. 6. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7789/2007 M/s Nanak Ram & Brothers Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. 7. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7790/2007 M/s Mahesh Traders Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. 8. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7791/2007 M/s Sadu Ram Sannoo Mal Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. 9. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7792/2007 Om Prakash Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. 10. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7793/2007 M/s Kametiwala & Co. Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of order : 10th December, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. M.C. Bhoot ) for the petitioners Dr. Sachin Acharya) Mr. R.S. Saluja for the respondents. ------- CW-2099/08-M/s Harish Brothers Vs. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti,Udaipur & Ors. & 9 Other connected writ petitions. Judgment dt.10.12.2009 2/3 1. In this batch of matters, the learned counsel for the respondent – Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Udaipur Mr. R.S. Saluja submits that with the affidavit of respondent Samiti, Secretary, Ram Singh Shishodia filed in this Court on 14.9.2009, they have produced a copy of Immovable Property Allotment Policy, 2005 effective from 25.4.2005 under which the respondent KUMS can consider the application of the licence holders for allotment for a period of 49 years of the shop / godowns in question belonging to the respondent Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Udaipur. He submits that all the petitioners before this Court have applied to the respondent - Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Udaipur for such allotment of shops / godowns on lease basis and such applications can be considered in accordance with the aforesaid Policy of 2005. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. M.C. Bhoot does not dispute this position and submits that a time frame may be given to the respondents to consider such applications filed by the petitioners so that such consideration can take place within the stipulated time frame and also a liberty may be given to the petitioners to approach this Court again, if they have any grievance against such process of allotment / lease under the aforesaid 2005 Policy. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-KUMS, Udaipur also CW-2099/08-M/s Harish Brothers Vs. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti,Udaipur & Ors. & 9 Other connected writ petitions. Judgment dt.10.12.2009 3/3 submits that four petitioners namely (1) M/s Pandwas Brothers, (2) M/s Nanakram & Brothers, (3) M/s Mohan Thok Bazar and (4) M/s Mahesh Traders have two godowns each whereas as per the Policy they can be allotted only one godown. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners is not in position to controvert this statement at this stage. 5. Accordingly all these writ petitions are disposed of with direction to the respondent – Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Udaipur to decide such applications filed by the present petitioners for allotment / grant of lease of the shops / godowns under the aforesaid 2005 Policy in accordance with law within a period of six months from today i.e. on or before 30.6.2010. 6. If the petitioners have any grievance against such allotment / grant of lease, they would be at liberty to approach this Court by way of fresh writ petition raising their grievance. 7. With these observations, these writ petition are disposed of. No order as to costs. [ DR. VINEET KOTHARI ], J. item No.9 to 18 babulal/