IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 16935 of 2010 Date of Decision: 20.9.2010. Sh. Kaka Singh --Petitioner Versus Staff Selection Commission and another --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Rohiteshwar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.D. Sharma, D.A.G., Haryana and Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate present in the Court have been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 respectively. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner applied for the post of Plant Attendant Grade-II (Fitter Trade) in response to the Advertisement No.8/2006 dated 19.10.2006 issued by respondent no.2. On the basis of the interview the petitioner was selected under Roll No. 247. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite his selection he has not been appointed to the post in question. Petitioner served a legal notice (Annexure P-2) in this respect but no decision has been taken thereon till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the legal notice served by the petitioner, referred to above. CWP. No. 16935 of 2010 -2- In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to take decision on the legal notice served by the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said authority. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 20.9.2010. lucky