w INTHE HOJ^'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR M.A. rcvNo. ^ /2009 APPELLANT It. ^^s^. RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. 2. Sushil Kumar Agrawal A-^f"lf!^> 4 S/0 Shri Ramkishun Agrawal, Occup'ation Business, R/o Banaras Road, Behind B.T.I., Ambikapur, Tehsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja, C.G Praduman Rajwade S/o Shri Gowardhan Rajwade, Aged about 20 Years, Caste Raj'war, Occupation Labourer R/o Village Mangoti, Tesil Surajpur, District Sarguja, C.G Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation (Labour Court) Ambikapur, District Sarguja, C.G. ^Tt^ APPEAL UNDER SECTION 30 OF WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT 1923 AGAINST AWARD DATED 26/09/2007 fCOPY APPLIED 29/09/07 RECEIVED ON 03/10/071 PASSED BY COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT fLABOUR COURT1 AMBIKAPUR IN CASE N0. 56/WC ACT /2005/NON FATAL ORDERING THE APPELLANT TO DEPOSIT COMPENSATION OF Rs.77.701/- AS COMPBNSATION WITH INTEREST 12 % PER ANNUM AND ALSO Rs. 10.000A»TQWARDS PENALTY TOTAL Rs. i.07.20i/- . COMPENSATION CLAIMED COMPENSATION AWARDED CLIAM IN APPEAL VALUED AT Rs. 2,51,000/- Rs. 1,07,201/- Rs. 1,07,201/- t. ..-i !.. •-!lt«!II., '•???'l'Rl 'ine^i'iSI ?ffl3n^i •Sti *n*iwi »*n^R T5T '^l'41cl'4, OTil'M'ie, [qMiyy .!^.d.cl^..^.:.3i^6^' (?l^-^ ^37 w^raq? CWI^IT •yf^ci sn^T 20/3/2009 Ms. Morisha Chhattri, Learaed counsel for fh^ iastruction on toehalfofthe ap^ Consequently, appeal ^ No order as to the costsl qii^Ii']41-i w^v& ^ ft^ <("i<{it ^T affilH 3Ilt?T 4dvocate for the appellaat. appeUant submits fhatsbe has no .ppleUanfc dismissed for waat ofprosecution. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge