IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2010 / 10TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10450 of 2010(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- DR.T.ABRAHAM VAIDYAN, MEDICAL OFFICER, DISTRICT HOMEO HOSPITAL, KOLLAM RESIDING AT MADATHIL, THEVALAKKARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF HOMEOPATHY, DIRECTORATE OF HOMEOPATHY, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DR.SUSHAMA DHD, PIRAVANTHOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 10450 of 2010 E ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 31st day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T Raising grievances against Ext.P1 draft transfer list, the petitioner, who is a Medical Officer, submitted Ext.P2 representation. His grievance is essentially against the proposal to post the 2nd respondent in the District Homeo Hospital, Kollam. The apprehension of the petitioner is that before considering Ext.P2, which was submitted in terms of Ext.P1, Ext.P1 would be finalised. It is obvious from Ext.P1 itself that objections were invited thereunder. Therefore, there is no basis for the apprehension of the petitioner that Ext.P2 would not be considered before finalising Ext.P1. However, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P2 while finalising Ext.P1 draft transfer order in case Ext.P1 transfer order has not already been finalised after considering Ext.P2. (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) aks