IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3492 of 2008 RAJ KUMAR YADAV @ KUMAR YADAV @ RAJ KUMAR @ KUMAR RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 12-05-2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP on behalf of the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner is an accused in a case u/ss 302, 307 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The specific allegation against the petitioner is that he shot at Sundar Rai from his rifle which hit on his left knee. He fell down. It is said that he died on the next day. It appears that in the alleged incident Kailash Singh was also fired upon which hit on his right knee. Learned counsel submitted that on the person of injured Kailash Singh the doctor found two lacerated wounds caused by hard and blunt object. She submitted that there was no motive on the part of the petitioner to commit the murder. It appears that during post mortem examination the doctor found fire arms injury on the knee of the deceased. The petitioner is, thus, assailant of the deceased, Sundar Rai. Learned counsel for the informant pointed out that antecedent of the petitioner is also not good as he is accused in 10 more criminal cases. In the facts and circumstances of the case, at this stage, this court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. The prayer is refused. The court below is directed to expedite the disposal of the - 2 - case. Keep the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the informant on record. BKS/ (M. Saran,J.)