IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7346 of 2008 SHEO PRASAD SHAH, SON OF LATE JAGAN SAO, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-BUDHA COLONY, P.O.+P.S.-BUDHA COLONY, DISTRICT-PATNA. ……………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE PATNA UNIVERSITY, PATNA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR, PATNA. 3. THE REGISTRAR, PATNA UNIVERSITY, PATNA. 4. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, PATNA UNIVERSITY, PATNA. ………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 6 14.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the University. Learned counsel for the University pointed out that in the counter affidavit filed earlier details of payments made to the petitioner have been given. Since the pension payment order enclosed with the counter affidavit was not legible he did not press his affidavit on that day. Today a clear legible copy of pension payment order has been produced by the learned counsel for the University and the copy of the same has been handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ application may be 2 disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise any remaining grievance before the appropriate authority of the University. Accordingly, this writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh , J. )