CWP(T) No. 7132/2008 6.12.2010 Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. A.G. for the respondents. Mr. Kuthiala submits that this is a legal aid matter. Mr. Kuthiala, today has placed on record extract of the Parivar Register in support of his contentions that private respondent No.3 belongs to another village and thus she was not eligible to have been considered under the terms of office memo dated 28.12.1999. This petition was filed in the year 2000 and no interim relief was granted to the petitioner. Private respondent No.3 has been working for more than 11 years as a part time sweeper. At such a belated stage, I am not inclined to interfere with the selection and appointment of private respondent No.3. Question of correctness and authenticity of the documents is left open. However, to meet the ends of justice respondents are directed to consider the petitioner’s case for appointment as a part time sweeper or on any other post in accordance with law. Petitioner belongs to schedule caste family and is perhaps living below the poverty line. Considering the peculiar facts of the instant case, it is expected of the respondents to consider the petitioner’s case sympathetically. Respondent No.2 shall take a decision positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. With these observations, present petition is disposed of. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. December 6, 2010. (jai)