-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3791 OF 2008 Sou. Radhika Kiran Joshi .. Petitioner. V/s. The Special Recovery Officer & Anr. .. Respondents. --- Mr.Amit Shetye h/f.Mr.Amit Borkar for the Petitioner. Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for the Respondent No.2. ----- CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 16TH JULY, 2008. DATED : 16TH JULY, 2008. DATED : 16TH JULY, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard Mr.Amit Shetye, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr.Rayrikar, AGP for the respondent no.2. 2. This petition takes exception to the order passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar in a revision. This revision was filed by the petitioner challenging auction notice issued by the recovery officer under Rule 107 (11) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules 1961. It is not disputed that the petitioner earlier also filed revision application before the Divisional Joint Registrar on the same ground and it was rejected on merits. In that view of the matter, the subsequent revision also came to be dismissed by the order impugned -: 2 :- in this petition. I do not see any error or illegality in the impugned order as the petitioner’s earlier revision on similar ground was rejected on merits and that order was not challenged further. Petition is devoid of any substance and the same is, therefore, dismissed. ( R.V. MORE, J.) .....