19 I # %. 18.08.2010 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. for the Petitioners. Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State/R-1 with SI Varun Dalai, P.S. North Rohini. Respondent Nos. 2 to 8 in person. +Crl. M.A. No. 13850/2010 (exemption) •k Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. +Crl. M.C. No. 2648/2010 * 1. Petitioners and respondent Nos. 2 to 8 are neighbours. A quarrel took place between them on some trivial issue wherein injuries were sustained by the complainant (respondent No. 2) and her family members i.e. respondent Nos. 3 to 8. Being neighbours, petitioners and respondent Nos. 2 to 8 have now settled their disputes amicably, as they want to maintain harmonious relations in future. 2. Initially FIR was registered under Sections 452/323/354/427/34 IPG. Later on, Section 307 IPG was added. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 3. In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, I am of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served by compelling the parties to continue to litigate a protracted trial. In the larger interest, I quash the FIR No. 32/09 under Sections 323/354/427/452/307/34 IPG registered at police station North Rohini and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom. 4. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. 5. Dasti. August 18, 2010 rb A.K. PATHAK, J. /