-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9021 OF 2004 Karad Patan Taluka Prathamik Shikshak Sahakari Society Limited and another ... Petitioner versus D.R. Patil and another ... Respondents Mr. M.S. Topkar for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Pakale for respondent No.1. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR, J. DATE: JULY 24, 2008. P.C. The advocates have mentioned that the matter is settled finally. The Registry had not placed papers of this case in the morning session. Since the parties are present, the papers were called for. The explanation given by the Registry is that the Registry was under the impression that the writ petition was disposed of finally and that is how papers were not placed in the first sitting. 2. On 30th June, 2008, a settlement was placed on record before the learned single Judge as the dispute was settled between the petitioner and second respondent. The learned single Judge, therefore, disposed of the petition as against respondent No.2. The Registry wrongly without reading -2- the said order sent the matter back in the disposal branch on the ground that the petition was disposed of. The matter is called back and now taken up for recording the consent terms between the petitioner and respondent No.1. 3. Settlement has been arrived at between the petitioner and the first respondent. Consent terms between the petitioner and the first respondent are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. Respondent No.1 has agreed to accept a lumpsum amount in lieu of reinstatement, continuity of service, back wages and all other legal dues. The representative of the petitioner as well as respondent No.1 are present. They accept the consent terms. The respective parties have been identified by their Advocates. The Advocates have also signed the consent terms along with the parties. In view of the consent terms, the impugned orders are replaced by the consent terms. Since the parties have settled the disputes, the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the amount deposited with accrued interest, if any, in the Registry of this Court towards back wages. 4. In view of the consent terms, the whole petition stands disposed of. Rule is discharged. P.B. MAJMUDAR, J.