(^ 'sr^2^ 8EMGII m THE HIOH COURT OF JU&ICATURE OP CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR Writ Petitionj[S11 N0, \^f^_ jW>lQ PETmONER A« '?..' /^ '?<' ^&e: ,..-1^ ^'? >/ ^y ..••• ^y Laharu Ram Pradhaa Aged ab&ut 42 years^ S/& Shri Sukhna Rsesi, OceupaMoa Pe&ted at Graa'iia Udyaii Vi.staa* Adhiteari Khacsiya &istrict Ra^arb: {C.&4R/& Sargay Nifcuig AajoripaK Khasari-ya District Raigarh (C.G.) y VERSUS RESPONDENT& ^ss^ 1} ' State of Chhattis^3-h throu^i The Secretary AgFiculture aeat D.K.&. Bhasiraa Raipur (C.G.) J^" 2} The Direetar Hortieutture Directorate Raipur (C.G.) 3)[ The Assistant Elifec Hortteiiteure Saagss^ Qistriet Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT I^TITIOW AKTICLE 22fr OP THE CONSTITUTtON O^F INDIA FOR ISSUANC& OP WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CEm-IORARY OR ANY OTHER WRrr OF LIKE NATURE ETC. The petitioner most faumMy aad respeetfuBy beg^ to subinit as under: a^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAfiH AT BILA8PUR PETmONER WRTT PETmON (S) No. 1299 of2010 : Laham Ram Pradhan. VERSUS ^ RESPONDENTS : StateofChhattisgarh&Others. WRTF PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB;;Hon'ble Shri Sattsh K. Asnihotri. J. Present: Sfari Manoj Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Paiiel Lawyer forthe State/resporidents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 29aday of March, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition wifh liberty to make a representation to the respondent authorities. 2. It is ordered accordingly. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty, ifso advised. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Amit