IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15761 of 2008 ANIL MAHATO & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 19.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 144, 461, 379, 427 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. A supplementary affidavit has been filed today on behalf of the petitioner annexing the copy of the plaint with respect to the land dispute between the petitioners and the informant. It is submitted that there is no specific allegation against these two petitioners and nor there has been any recovery of the alleged pumping set from the possessions of these petitioners. Learned counsel for the state on perusal of the case diary, submits that during investigation no recovery has been made from the possession of these petitioners. Having considered the submissions, as noticed above, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, - 2 - namely, Anil Mahato and Chhotu Mahato be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 76 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)