HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRL.P.No.9561 of 2010 ORDER: This petition is filed to quash the docket order dated 18.09.2010 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1984 of 2010 in Crime No.299 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Anantapur. Petitioners herein, who are A-2 and A-3, in Crime No.299 of 2010 of I-Town Police Station, Anantapur, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A I.P.C. and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, filed Crl.M.P.No.1769 of 2010 under Section 437 of Cr.P.C. before the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Anantapur, seeking regular bail and that the learned Magistrate by an order dated 10.08.2010, while enlarging the petitioners-A2 and A3 on bail, imposed the following conditions: “1) The petitioners-A2 and A3 shall execute a self bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each. 2) The petitioners-A2 and A3 shall appear before the Court on every Saturday in between 10.30 A.M. to 5.00 P.M. till filing of charge sheet or for two months, whichever is earlier. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the petitioners-A2 and A3 are regularly attending before the Court below on every Saturday. However, on 18.09.2010 they could not appear before the Court below on account of their ill-health and, therefore, they filed Crl.M.P.No.1984 of 2010 under Section 317 Cr.P.C., along with medical certificate, seeking to condone their absence. The Court below by an order dated 18.09.2010, while dismissing the said petition, cancelled the bail order, which was granted on 10.08.2010, on the ground of non-compliance of the conditions. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners-A2 andA3 preferred this criminal petition. Heard both sides. The impugned order of the Court below, in my considered view, is illegal. When a proper explanation is offered on 18.09.2010 stating that the petitioners could not attend the Court on account of their ill-health, the Court below ought not to have cancelled the bail granted to the petitioners. The Court below without even assigning any reasons mechanically cancelled the bail order granted to the petitioners by way of a docket order. Since the date of their release on bail, it is apparent from record that the petitioners-A2 and A3 are regularly appearing before the Court below on every Saturday. Therefore, it can be said that the conduct of the petitioners herein is bona fide and their absence on 18.09.2010 is neither willful nor wanton, it is only due to their ill-health and also on the advice of the doctor, they could not appear before the Court below. In that view of the matter, the impugned order dated 18.09.2010 is set aside and the Crl.M.P.No.1984 of 2010 is allowed. The Criminal Petition is accordingly allowed. _________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 24-09-2010 Gsn.