HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10435 OF 2007 ORDER: The petitioner is a practicing Advocate. He complaints that the Anantapur Municipal Corporation, the respondent herein, is not following G.O.Ms. No.187, dated 06-12-2000 for appointing Standing Counsels in the trial Courts at Anantapur. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. 3. The record does not disclose that any Advocate has been appointed as Standing Counsel, much less, such an Advocate is impleaded as a party in the writ petition. It is not known as to whether any appointment has been made in the recent past. If the petitioner has any grievance vis-a vis the impugned appointment, he can certainly pursue the remedies. 4. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J February 17, 2011. KTL