IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1227 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.9.2010. Haryana Wakf Board ....Petitioner Versus Satpal Singh ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present:- Mr. G.S. Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner. RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J In view of the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India, in the case of Ramesh Gobindram (dead) through Lrs. Vs. Sugra Humayun Mirza Wakf, Civil Appeal No. 1182 of 2006, the matter has to be decided by the Civil Court and the Wakf Tribunal has no jurisdiction in the matter. Thus, the impugned order is set aside. The parties are at liberty to avail appropriate remedy before the competent Civil Court with regard to redressal of their grievances in accordance with law. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) 20.9.2010. JUDGE Reema