IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No. 42 of 2009 Smt. Rajni and another …Petitioners. Versus Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and others. …Respondents. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. I.P. Kohli, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for respondent no. 4. None for respondent no. 2. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has been instructed by the petitioners that supply of Re-fill L.P. G. Cylinders has been streamlined and there is no difficulty being faced by the petitioners, and as such, the petitioners wish to withdraw the instant writ petition. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J) 26.2.2010 Rathour