IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU W.P.No.20726 OF 2011 Date:22.07. 2011 Between:- N.V.Narayana .. Petitioner And The A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society, Hyderabad and others. .. Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU W.P.No.20726 OF 2011 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not regularizing the service of the petitioner in terms of G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.04.1994, by considering the representation, dated 30.04.2011, of the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, direct the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner in terms of the said G.O. 2. The petitioner was appointed as Night Watchman on 01.07.1988 in the respondent Society on daily wage basis and posted to work at Peddavegi Residential School. He worked from 01.07.1988 to 30.04.1990 and from 01.07.1990 to till date and there was an artificial break from 30.04.1990 to 01.07.1990. Though he has been working continuously in the said post for several years, his services were not regularized. So, he filed W.P.No.13065 of 1991, which was allowed, and the respondents filed appeal vide W.A.No.617 of 1993. This Court passed interim order in W.A.No.725 of 1993 and batch and pursuant to the said orders, the petitioner has been drawing regular salaries of pay w.e.f. 14.06.1993. The batch of writ petitions were disposed of. As per the guidelines contemplated in G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.04.1994, issued by respondent No.2, the petitioner is entitled for regularization of his services. Initially, respondent No.3 has not submitted the petitioner’s particulars for regularization on the ground that there is an artificial break of service from 01.05.1990 to 30.06.1990. Though respondent No.3 furnished the petitioner’s particulars on 11.04.2011, his case was not considered. So, he made a representation, dated 30.04.2011, to respondent No.1 but in vain. Hence, the present writ petition. 3. Heard. 4. Whether the petitioner is entitled to regularization of his services in terms of G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.04.1994 or not has to be decided by respondent No.1. Therefore, respondent No.1 is directed to take appropriate decision on the representation, dated 30.04.2011, of the petitioner in accordance with the rules and regulations within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and thereafter, communicate the same to the petitioner. 5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ JUSTICE K.C.BHANU 22nd July, 2011. AMD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU W.P.No.20726 OF 2011 Date:22.07.2011 AMD