IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5021 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 28.10.2009 Gian Singh and another .....Petitioners versus Sat Pal .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.K.D.Sachdeva, Advocate, for the respondent. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is preferred by the landlords against the order dated 17.8.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Nabha, whereby the provisional rent of the demised shop situated at Mehs Gate Chowk, Nabha, has been assessed as Rs.200/- per month. The shop in dispute was statedly let out to the respondent- tenant in the year 2005. According to the landlord, the agreed rate of rent was Rs.2000/- per month. The respondent-tenant has disputed the same. I have heard counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order. C.R. No.5021 of 2009 (O&M) 2 Both the parties have referred to some documents in support of their respective claims. It appears from the impugned order that the documents relied upon by the petitioner-landlords have not been gone into by the Rent Controller though the same are likely to have some bearing on the determination of the provisional rent which is essentially adhoc in nature. Any further observation made at the stage may prejudice either of the parties. For the reasons aforestated, the revision petition is allowed; the impugned order is set-aside and the matter is remitted to the Rent Controller, Nabha to pass a fresh order regarding the provisional assessment of the rent, in accordance with law. Dasti. 28-10-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE