1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY & ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 857 OF 2009 Kantilal Bastimal Jodhavat. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Helen Francis Carvalho & Anr. ... Defendants. Mr. B.N. Shah i/b. Pramesh Vakil for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 22nd SEPTEMBER 2009. P.C. :- This is a Suit on a Bill of Exchange. The First Defendant took a loan from the Plaintiff. The Bill of Exchange drawn by the Plaintiff on the First Defendant has been duly accepted by the Second Defendant. However, upon presentation, the same is dishonoured. The Plaintiff, therefore, issued a Demand Notice but there has been no response to the same. Accordingly, the present Suit has been filed under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Plaintiff has claimed interest at the statutory rate. Further, the writ of summons has been duly served but no appearance has been entered by both Defendants. Considering that the suit Bill of Exchange has been drawn, accepted and dishonoured at Bombay, the loan amount has also been disbursed at Bombay and parties are residing at Bombay that this Court has 2 jurisdiction to entertain and try this Suit. The Suit claim is also not barred by limitation. Considering that there is no dispute as far as the liability is concerned, the Suit is decreed as prayed. The Original documents are taken on record and marked ‘P’ collectively. Advocate’s costs to be computed as per Rules. Refund of Court fees as per Rules. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)