IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FA No.190 of 1994 THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, PATNA. ...OPPOSITE PARTY....APPELLANT. Versus SMT. GIRJA DEVI, W/O DR. RAM KISHORE PRASAD, R/O FADNPUR, P.S. BARH, DISTRICT- PATNA. ........APPLICANT...RESPONDENT. With FA No.199 of 1994 THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, PATNA. ...OPPOSITE PARTY....APPELLANT. Versus SRI KAUSHALENDRA PRASAD SINHA, S/O LATE RAJENDRA PRASAD SINHA, R/O NULAWAN, P.S.DHANARUWA, DISTRICT-PATNA. ........APPLICANT...RESPONDENT. with FA No.203 of 1994 THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, PATNA. .........OPPOSITE PARTY....APPELLANT. Versus 1.ALOK KUMAR SINHA, S/O UDAI NARAIN SINHA. 2.NOOTAN MELA, W/O A.K SINHA, C/O DR. J.P. SINHA, R/O VILLAGE-RAJENDRA NAGAR, P.S. KADAMKUAN, DISTRICT-PATNA. ........APPLICANT...RESPONDENT. with FA No.209 of 1994 THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, PATNA. ...OPPOSITE PARTY....APPELLANT. Versus SRI RAGHUBIR SINGH YADAV, S/O DASAI SINGH YADAV, R/O VILLAGE-BARIPAHARI, P.S. ALAMGANJ, DISTRICT-PATNA. ........APPLICANT...RESPONDENT. For the State: Mr. Pushkar Narain Shahi, Advocate, AAG-XIV with Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Sheela Sharma, Advocate. ----------- 13/ 10.03.2011 Heard counsel for the parties. These four appeal and cross appeal 2 arise out of the common judgment which had given rise to more than 140 appeals by a judgment dated 19.11.1992, out of these 140 appeals a batch of them has been recently disposed of by this Court by a judgment dated 26.03.2010 in F.A No. 134 of 1994 and its analagous cases which are F.A No. 128 of 1994, F.A No. 104 of 1994, F.A No. 77 of 1994, F.A No. 131 of 1994, F.A No. 129 of 1994, F.A No. 88 of 1994, F.A No. 141 of 1994, F.A No. 70 of 1994 and F.A No. 94 of 1994. It is agreed by counsel for both the parties that the aforementioned judgment of this Court dated 26.03.2010, would squarely cover the present four appeals and the cross appeal, wherein this Court has upheld the judgment and award passed by the Court below without any further interference and in fact has also dismissed the cross appeals filed by the land holders. That being so, this rate of Rs. 21000/- per katha is declared to be the price payable to the land-holders in all these four cases and therefore, while dismissing these appeals and cross appeals as a whole this Court would direct for payment of the same amount of Rs. 21,000/-per katha along with other admissible 3 statutory amount. It is also made clear that these four cases would be also governed by the judgment of this Court dated 26.03.2010 in F.A No. 134 of 1994 and its analagous cases. In the result, all these four appeals as well as cross appeal are dismissed. There would be however, no order as to costs. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J)