1 nms-1912-s-683-09-nms-2924-s-2519-08-nms-1228-s-683-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1912 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 683 OF 2009. M/s. Jaspal Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ..Plaintiffs. vs. Mrs. Kiran Mishra & Ors. ..Defendants. WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2924 OF 2008 IN SUIT NO. 2519 OF 2008. M/s. Venus Habitat & Anr. ..Plaintiffs. vs. Pukhraj Pirchand Doshi & Ors. ..Defendants. WITH NOTICE OF MOTION 1228 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 683 OF 2009. M/s. Jaspal Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ..Plaintiffs. vs. Mrs. Kiran Mishra & Ors. ..Defendants. .... Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni, Senior Counsel,, a/w. Mr. Tejas Deshmukh, a/w. Mr. Mandar Soman, i/b. Vinit Kulkarni, for Plaintiff in Suit No. 683/2009. Mr. Jai Chinoi, Mrs. Sonal, a/w. Mr. S.A. Bhagwat, i/b. Chitnis Vaithy & Co., for Plaintiff in Suit No. 2519/2008 & Defendant Nos. 2 & 3 iin Suit No. 683 of 2009. Mr. M.S. Menon, for Defendant No. 1, in Suit No. 683/2009. Mr. A.N. Narula, i/b. Jh. Narula & Assoc., for Defendant No.6 in Suit No. 683/2009 & for Defendant Nos. 3 & 11 in Suit No. 2519/2008. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 20TH JANUARY 2011. 2 nms-1912-s-683-09-nms-2924-s-2519-08-nms-1228-s-683-09 P.C. The Defendants to the above Suits to file their written statements on or before 21st February 2011. The hearing of the above Suits stand expedited. Place the above Suits for framing of issues on 28th February 2011. Since the hearing of the above Suits is expedited, pending the hearing and final disposal of the Suits the ad- interim order shall continue and no further orders are passed in the Notices of Motion. The above three Notices of Motion therefore stand disposed of. 2. The learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Plaintiffs in Suit No. 2519 of 2008 submits that the report submitted by the Juhu Police Station pursuant to the directions give by the City Civil Court, Mumbai, is not conclusive as to the identity of the individuals against whom investigation was directed. He therefore submits that a CID inquiry be instituted against the eight individuals whose identity is inter-se disputed. Parties are granted liberty to make an application before this Court within one week from the date of this order, setting out the detailed facts in the matter and seeking appropriate reliefs. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]