IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 863 of 2008 Ram Singh, S/o Guman Singh. …... Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. ..…. Respondents Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted final report against the petitioner before the court concerned on 04.12.2008. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the Interim order dated 04.11.2008 stands vacated automatically. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 30.12.2008 V.K