^^— e ,^l^^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, C.G. .33^ WRIT PETITION N0. ^004 (Petition under article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) PETITIONER ^i ^ ^" ^^ ^:^' ^^^^ Nai! ^^^y cs- ^'^^'y(^^"i Deo Nath Ram Yadav, S/o late Subendra Yadav, aged about 63 years, retire.d Upper Divisioii Teacher R/o Village and post Nagamair, Tahsil Jagadalpui, Distt. Bastar, ,.•••' RESPONDENTS ^•,"% J VERSUS : 1) StateofChhattisgarhthiou^itheSecretary, Education Deptt. D.K.S. Bhawan RaipKr, C.G. 2) Chief Accoiuitant General, State of Chhattisgarh, Fafadih Raipiir, C.G. 3) Joint Director, Treasuiy & Accounts, State of Chhattisgrh, at Jagadalpur Distl. Bastaa- C.G. 4) Prindpal Govt. H.S. School, Nagamar, Jagadalpur, D^tt. Bastar, C.G. 1^RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE A WRIT OF ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OFMANDAMUS OR CERTIORARI. PROHIBITION ETC. XI-HG—78 -^i^^if^rNT ^^T 3?T?Tf^RW ^j 1*1^13 ^W^ '3^ ^i^icn^, •^tii^<r^ fsi<'ii^li< .S°/t'<00/ S2>^ct |2-je'~ttL\ 3TT^?TR^(^f3^?) ^^TW^ftTT 3TT^T 27-01-2005. Shri Vishnu Koshta, learned | Shri Yashv^nt Singh, State/respondents, on advance co(^. Heard. The case of the petitionerj Assistant Teacher on 12-12-196? Djvision Teacher w.e.f. 03-05-1990 scate and ultimately he retired 0(1 Division Teacher itself. Learned counsel for the peti benefits have been paid, but a deducted from his payment. He | not been fixed Jn accordance withj of arguments, leamed counsel for the petitioner be allowed to fil©a respondente and they may be dir^c wlthin a stipulated period given by This llmited prayer, made not opposed by learned counsef foij The prayer is atlowed. It is directed that the petiti^ before the concerned respondent^ along with copy of this order &j concerned respondente shall deci<|e ^Ptf^PTt^ HIH^f "^ fe^ T^f^K ^ ^stRFT ^TI^F jcounsel for the petitioner. jlearned Govt. Advocate, for the is that he was initiajly appointed as and thereafter promoted as Upper His pay was fixed on a particular 31-07-2003 from the post of Upper ^tioner submits that though some retiraS ^um of Rs.37,821/- has been iJJegally jalso submits that the pensi'on has also jthe provision of law. During the course the petitioner made a limited prayer that c|etailed representation to the concerned ^cted to decide the said representation this Court. |>y learned counsel for the petltioner, Is ItheState. n@r shall fite a detailed representation within a period of 15 days from today copy of wrft petition and in turn the the same in accordance with law by ^ T XI-HC—78 ^T^TqTi' ^.v^- '/' "V ^^r '^iPT^R, ^T?FT^, t^^TR^T ..lg:.?r.;u.&'...3.5>.^..^^ 'q^? ^. ^ reasoned order, as early as pos^ble preferably within a period of four J months from the date of receipt of thje said representation. With the aforesaid obsdrvation, the petition stands finally disposed of. Consequently, I.A. No.7173/^004 stands djsposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge