IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I‘TISGARH ' BILASPUR Writ Petition No 4822 of 2004 WRIT PETYI‘ON UNDER ARTICLE 226 6n 227 OF’I‘HE CONSTITU’I‘ION OF INDEA (SB: Hon’ble Shri Saiish K. Agnjhotri J.) Shxi Ashok Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Shli Yashwant Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents. 0 R D E R (Passed on this 15th Day ofSeptember, 2008) Petitioner Lileshwar Prasad Sonkar (Katholia), aged 28 years, Slo late Shxi Ram Khilawan Sonkar, Shiksha Karmi Grade-HI, Rio — Village Atéxjhola, P.O. -— Mohgaon, Tahsil -—- Saja, Distt. ~ Durg (C.G.). Versus Respondents 1. Siate of Chhai‘tiSgarh, Through z Secreiary Education Mantralaya, 1).K.S. Bhawan, Rajpur C.G. 2. Deputy Director Education, Distt.- Durg, QG. 3. Collector, Durg. 4. Chief Executive Offlcer, Janpat Panchayat, Saja. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this matter on merits at this stage and seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation to the concerned authority. The concerned authority may be directed to consider and decide the representation in accordance with law within a reasonable period. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents] State submits that the representation, if any, shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 3. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the afore—stated liberty. /,,, t Sd/- ‘ Satish K. Agm'hou-t i Thakur Judge