IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.3554 of 2009 Date of decision:15.10.2010. Seeta ...Appellant Versus Jarnail Kaur and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’B LE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. J.S.Brar, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Gourav Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) The only ground raised in this appeal is that the learned Election Tribunal has decided the election petition without framing issues under Section 81 of the Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994 [for short “the Act”]. Learned counsel for the respondents states that he has no objection if this appeal is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the learned Election Tribunal to decide it afresh after framing of issues which may emerge from the pleadings of the parties. In view thereof, this appeal is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the learned Election Tribunal for deciding it afresh after framing relevant issues suggested by learned counsel for the parties. Let the whole exercise be done within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The parties, through their learned counsel, are directed to appear before the learned Election Tribunal on 29.10.2010. October 15, 2010. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE