CWP No.19579 of 2009.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.19579 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.04.2011 **** Harish Kumar . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Anr. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Pardeep Bajaj, Advocate; Mr. HS Brar, Advocate; Mr. Karanjit Singh, Advocate for the PETITIONER(s) Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG Punjab Mr. Prem Singh, Advocate and Mr. Surinder Kapoor, Advocate for MC Zira Mr. Surinder Nagpal, Advocate for MC Doraha Mr. Sunil K Sahore, Advocate for NHAI **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). This order shall dispose of CWP Nos.19579 of 2009; 15589 & 15301 of 2010 as common issues are involved in these cases. (2). The petitioner(s) seek quashing of the order-cum-notice whereby the respondent - Municipality while invoking its powers under Section 146(2) of the Punjab Regional Town CWP No.19579 of 2009.doc - 2 – Planning & Development Act, 1995 has directed the petitioner(s) to remove the alleged unauthorized construction/building and restore to its original state failing which the authorities shall be constrained to remove the unauthorized construction at the cost of the petitioner(s). (3). Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present writ petition(s) be disposed of in terms of the directions issued vide order dated 07.02.2011 passed by this Court in CWP No.6104 of 2010 (Sukhdev Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors.) and other connected matters. (4). The writ petition(s) is/are disposed of in terms of Sukhdev Singh’s case (supra). (5). Dasti . 06.04.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge