THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3259 OF 2009 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order, dated 06.06.2007, in I.A.No.561 of 2007 in O.P.No.430 of 2003, on the file of III Additional District Judge (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal), Karimnagar, whereunder and whereby, the petition, filed to grant permission to the petitioner to withdraw an amount of Rs.4,72,229/- to enable him to purchase agricultural lands, was allowed, but by imposing conditions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the present petition is filed for withdrawal of amount to a tune of Rs.4,72,229/- for the purpose of purchasing agricultural lands; that the Tribunal while permitting the petitioner to withdraw the amount directed the petitioner to file copy of the agreement along with the petition that would be filed for issuance of cheque for withdrawal of the entire balance amount and also undertake to file copy of the registered sale deed immediately after purchase of the property, failing which appropriate action will be initiated against the petitioner; that the Tribunal ought not have imposed such a condition while passing the impugned order and hence, he prays to set aside the impugned order. 3. It seems that the petitioner instead of purchasing the land by the amount withdrawn, he has constructed a house. No doubt, the attitude of the petitioner is highly deprecated, in view of the fact that the petitioner has stated in the affidavit on oath that the amount is required for some other purpose. But, the petitioner used the amount for the purpose other than for which it was granted. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner has lost his both legs in the accident; that it would not be possible for him to do cultivation and therefore, he constructed a house and that as the brother of the petitioner has gone to Dubai, registered sale deed could not been executed. Considering the fact that the petitioner has lost his both legs in the accident and though he obtained the amount by misleading the Court, at the same time, the Court has to ascertain whether the petitioner has really used the amount for the purpose of constructing the house. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded to the Tribunal, so as to reconsider the case of the petitioner. The petitioner is directed to produce all the details with regard to the expenditure incurred by him for constructing the house and thereafter, appropriate decision has to be taken by the Tribunal in accordance with law. 5. With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C. BHANU, J November 19, 2010 MD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3259 OF 2009 Between: Koppari Devender Reddy .....PETITIONER AND Guduri Mallaiah and others ....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3259 OF 2009 November 19, 2010