1 S.B.Civil Second Appeal No.28/2007 Prabhu Dayal vs Sandeep Kumar & Ors. Date of order : 3.1.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.CS Kotwani, for the appellant. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the appellant. In view of the concurrent finding of fact against plaintiff with respect to the wall in question for which plaintiff claimed that the same is belonging to him and which has been recorded by the two courts below after appreciation of evidence, this court is not inclined to interfere with the above findings. Learned counsel for the appellant pointed out that even defendant had admitted in cross-examination that the wall in question is not covered in the measurement of his plot. That fact is absolutely irrelevant in view of the totality of the facts of the case and the reason that plaintiff and defendant both purchased the constructed houses and the wall was already in existence and the defendant's case is that his some structures are finding support from the said wall and to prove the wall in question to be plaintiff's exclusive wall, the plaintiff failed to 2 produce sufficient evidence. In view of the above, I do not find any substantial questions of law are involved in this appeal and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-