IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 22824 of 2005 Between: Talari Jayamma, W/o Pedda Rajanna, Madigubba Village, Atmakur Mandal, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 2. The Joint Collector, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 3. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Atmakur Mandal, Anantapur District. 4. The District Collector, Anantapur. ...RESPONDENTS * * * ORDER: This writ petition has been filed to quash the proceedings of the second respondent in Rc.No.K4/ATP/364/2005 dated 18.09.2005 confirming the orders of the first respondent in D.Dis.No.D1/CS/1603/2002, dated 01.03.2005. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for the respondents. 3. Admittedly, this Court granted stay of operation of the order cancelling authorization of fair price shop dealership of the petitioner pending disposal of the appeal. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur, cancelled the authorization of fair price shop held by the petitioner by order dated 01.03.2005. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Joint Collector. Pending disposal of the appeal, this Court granted stay of the impugned order and the Joint Collector by order dated 18.09.2005 dismissed the appeal confirming the cancellation of fair price shop authorization. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed revision under Clause 20(1)(i) of A.P. Public Distribution Control Order, 2001 before the District Collector, Anantapur on 01.10.2005, which is pending. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into the merits of the case, as there was stay pending disposal of the appeal, there shall be stay of operation of the order of the Joint Collector, so also the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer pending disposal of the revision and the District Collector may dispose of the revision filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. 5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date: 24th October 2005. BSB