ui»! ^HS^? a^'it?! \<^ IN THE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION (e-) N0.^' 24pF 2006 r PETITIONER: Lakhan Lal Shivhare, S/o Shri / Narayan Dasji Shivhare, Aged about 57 years, Branch Manager, ^•^'5^ Chhattisgarh State Ware Housing '.feff' ....••" Corporation, Kharsiya Branch, \s>- ^66"" ^>- isCff- '^•••" RESPONDENTS : /•:0 /^^ie,^ ,<^ Raigarh (Chhattisgarh). Versus 1. ChhattisgarhState Ware Housing^ Corporation, Through its Managing Director, Head Office, 22 Anand Nagar, Raipur, District Raipuri(CG).^ 2. Managing Director, ^ Chhatdsgarh State Ware Housing Corporation, Head Office, 22 Anand Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 3. Managing (Technical), ^ Chhattisgarh State Ware Housing Corporation, Head Office, 22 Anand Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). 4. Chhattisgarh Civil Supplies^ Corporation, Raipur, Through its Managing Director. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. As shown in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS. As shown in the cause title. /• * •^' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISG^AEHATLBILASPUR WMT PETmON fSy N0..6124 of2006 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Lakhan Lal Shivhare s/o Shri Narayan Dasji Shivhare, Aged about 57 years, Branch Manager, Chhattisgarh Sfate Ware Housing Coq)oration-, Kharsiya Branch, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1. Chhattisgarh State Ware Housing Corporation, Tlirough its Maaaging Direetor, Head OiBce, 22 Aiiaiid Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Ware Housmg Coi-poratioti, Head Office, 22 Aiiand Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 3. Managing CTechiiical) ClAattisgarh State Ware Housing Corporation, Head office 22, Anand Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTLTION OF INDIA SBj Hon'ble Shri Safish K. Aenihotri, J. Present: Shri N.P.Koshta, Advocate for the petitioner. (Passed on 25ttl day of June, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearine for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition. 2. It is ordered. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawii. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Anut