C482 No. 610 of 2010 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Shri Narayan Singh Negi Advocate, and Shri Dinesh Chauhan, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Heard. By means of this petition, moved under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 20th of August 2009, passed by Judicial Magistrate, Purola, District Uttarkashi, in Criminal Case No. 29 of 2008, Smt Gayatri Devi vs. Gopeshwar Prashad and others, which was affirmed by the learned Sessions Judge, Uttarkashi vide its order dated 05.03.2010, passed in Criminal Revision No. 25 of 2009, Gopeshwar Prashad vs. Gayatri Devi. Admittedly the respondent is wife of the petitioner. It is also evident from the papers on record that the petitioner is an old man aged around 75 years. It is also not disputed that earlier the petitioner was directed to pay Rs. 400/- per month as maintenance to his wife (respondent). She later moved an application under section 127 of Cr.P.C., for enhancement of maintenance, which is enhanced to Rs. 1000/- per month by the trial court, and the revisional court has affirmed said order. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is old and infirm person and he has no means to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs. 1000/- per month to the respondent. There are concurrent findings of fact recorded by the courts below, after appreciating the evidence on record. This court in its jurisdiction under section 482 of Cr.P.C., is not inclined to interfere with the same. Therefore, the petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C., is summarily dismissed with the observation that the petitioner is allowed to pay to the respondent arrears of the enhanced sum, or deposit in her favour before the trial court, within a period of three months from today. (P.C.P., J.) 01.07.2010 NP