CRM-M-30041-2011 ::::::::: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30041-2011 Date of Decision:09.11.2011 Noor Mohd. …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Sunil Panwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sagar Deswal, AAG, Haryana. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This is a petition for grant of regular bail in a pending trial case registered vide FIR No.71 dated 02.03.2011, under Sections 304-B and 34 of IPC at Police Station Punhana, District Mewat. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the elder brother of the father-in-law of Kulsum who is alleged to have been set at fire on 22.01.2011. He further submits that the FIR is registered on 02.03.2011 after about one month and 10 days of the alleged occurrence, whereas the inquest proceedings were carried out on 02.02.2011 after the death of Kulsum and at that time, the complainant Sattar Khan had recorded a statement before the Executive Magistrate that he did not receive any information from the in-laws of Kulsum regarding her burns rather he was informed by his acquaintance on a phone call and then they reached at hospital at Faridabad. He also said that he talked to Kulsum but she did not tell anything as to how she received burns. He further submits that the challan in this case has already been presented and the petitioner is in custody from 20.06.2011. 1 CRM-M-30041-2011 ::::::::: Learned State Counsel has though opposed the bail application but he could not deny the statement dated 02.02.2011 which was recorded before the Executive Magistrate. After hearing both the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, but without making any observation on the merits, the present petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) NOVEMBER 09, 2011 JUDGE vinod* 2