IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 19788 of 2009 Date of decision:- 4.2.2010 Saurabh Mittal petitioner vs State of Haryana. Respondent Present: Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate. Ms.Shobra singh, DAG, Hry M.M.S.BEDI,J. In view of the first report, pertaining to the sample of the milk being not adulterated and the second sample sent to the laboratory being in decomposed condition and unfit for analysis and another set of sample having been found not to be containing any synthetic element, prima facie it is not a case where the petitioner was indulging in sale of synthetic milk. It will be a moot point during trial whether it can be said to be a case u/s 420/511 IPC. Accordingly, the petition is allowed, interim order dated 23.7.2010 is hereby confirmed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioner, he will be admitted to bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the condition that he will appear before the investigating officer as and when required by the police and will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation at any stage. The petitioner will not commit the similar offence, of which he is accused of. In case he is found to be committing the similar offence, it will be open to the prosecution agency to seek cancellation of bail. February 4 ,2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) TSM JUDGE