IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.1367 OF 2007 Varsha Maroti Narwade ]PETITIONERS. VERSUS 1 The State of Maharashtra ]RESPONDENTS. & others. ----- Mr.U.K.Patil, AGP for respondent No.1 Mr.B.S.Mundhe,Advocate, for respondents NO.2 and 3. Mr.P.S.Agrawal, Advocate, for respondent NO.4 ----- Coram : Naresh H. Patil and N.D.Deshpande, JJ. Date : 19th June, 2009. PER COURT : The counsel for petitioner was absent on 18th June, 2009. Today also, none appears for petitioner. 2 The counsel for respondent No.2 Zilla Parishad states that there is alternate efficacious remedy available to the petitioner in view of provisions of Section 267A of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. 3 The petitioner may resort to alternate remedy as permissible in law. In case within four weeks if petitioner resorts to such alternate remedy, the same shall not be dismissed on the ground of limitation in view of pendency of this - 2 - petition. 4 With this observation, the petition is disposed of. [ N.D.Deshpande,J.] [ Naresh H. Patil,J.] pcr/o/wp1367.07