IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3880 of 2009 Date of decision:23.02.2010. Sham Lal ...Petitioner Versus Ram Saran Dass ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. K.S.Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not press the petition on merits. However, he requests little morewhile to enable the tenant to find out alternative accommodation and to vacate the tenanted premises. The petition shall stand dismissed. The findings of the learned Rent Controller and the learned Appellate Authority shall stand affirmed. In the light of that averment, it is agreed that the petitioner – tenant shall have one year's time from today to vacate the tenanted premises. This would be subject to the rider that the entire arrears till date shall be cleared by the petitioner – tenant within two months from today. Thereafter, he shall keep on paying the monthly rent by the 10th of every calendar month. In case, either of the two facets is not honoured by the petitioner – tenant, he shall be liable to be ejected forthwith. Disposed of accordingly. February 23, 2010 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE