IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14970 of 2009 1.ALAM KUJRA, Son of Jainul 2.HAJRAT KUJRA, Son of Jainul 3.ASLAM KUJRA @ SAMIM, Son of Jainul 4.TASLIM NADAF, Son of Aziz Nadaf 5.KALAM NADAF, Son of Aziz Nadaf 6.AZIZ NADAF, Son of Sadik Nadaf 7.JAINUL KAJRA, Son of Md. Samsad All R/O Village Koilak, P.S. Rajnagar, District Madhubani. ……Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …….Opposite Party ----------- 02/- 02-11-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of order dated 06.02.2009 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 180 of 2003 taking cognizance for the offence under Sections 302 and 498 (A) of the Indian Penal Code. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to agitate all his points including statement of the complainant-informant under Section 164 Cr.P.C., where in she has as stated spoken that the case was not 2 filed by her, rather someone else got the same filed and she has no grievance against the accused persons before the trial court, at appropriate stage preferably at the time of hearing on the point of charge, where the trial court pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of as withdrawn. Praveen (Akhilesh Chandra,J.)