IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 1591 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 08.03.2011 Manjit Singh ....Petitioner Vs. Harjit Singh and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. Vikas Mohan Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) This petition assails the order dated 03.02.2011 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ludhiana, whereby the application filed by the defendant-petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioner) under Order 8 Rule 9 read with Section 151 CPC, was dismissed. The ownership of plot No.4 is the question of fact, which is to be considered on the basis of the documents. If the petitioner is allowed to file reply to the replication, then there would be no end of the pleadings. Moreover, the Code of Civil Procedure does not provide for filing the reply to the replication. In these circumstances, this petition is dismissed. However, the trial Court would take note of the contradictory pleas set up by the plaintiffs-respondents in the plaint and replication at the time of disposal of the suit on merits. (A.N.JINDAL) 08th of March, 2011 JUDGE ajp