IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-1986 of 2008 Date of decision : 31.01.2009 Kulwinder Singh ....Petitioner V/s Bahadur Singh and others ....Respondents. BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Sukhmeet Singh, Advocate for Mr. J.S. Bhandehal, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. G.N. Malik, Advocate for respondent No. 3. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Counsel for respondent No. 1 states that there has been compromise between the parties. Counsel further submits that he has instructions to state before this Court that complainant-respondent No. 1 Bhadur Singh has decided to withdraw the complaint preferred by him before the Court of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Malerkotla. Counsel appearing for respondent No. 3 who is one of the accused has conceded that there has been a compromise between the parties. He has affirmed the statement made on behalf of complainant-respondent No. 1. In view of the statement made on behalf of complainant- respondent No. 1, this petition has been rendered infructuous and is Crl. Misc No. M-1986 of 2008 -2- dismissed as such. However, in case statement made today turns out to be false, the petitioner would be entitled to seek revival of the present petition. 31.01.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE