IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32550 of 2010 UTTAPATI NATH MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 28.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. It would appear from perusal of the contents of the complaint petition that co-accused Braj Bihari Mishra took advance money from complainant on different dates to execute sale deed but he did not fulfil his promise. So far as the petitioner is concerned, it is alleged that he was also present at the time of alleged transaction. Even the story, as propounded by the complainant, assumes to be true then also it appears to me that this case is of civil nature. Considering the aforesaid circumstances, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner(Uttapati Nath Mishra) in the event of arrest/ surrender within 30 days from the date of communication of the order be released on bail in connection with Complaint Case no.1832 of 2000 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri U.M. Tripathy, J.M., Bettiah subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))