IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2927 of 2004. Roop Chand @ Roopa son of Shri Sahara Ram VERSUS Narad Lal son of Shri Chadru Ram & Others. Date Of Order ::: 18/03/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Mr. Rajnish Gupta, Counsel for the Petitioner Mr. Amit Gupta, advocate, for Mr. B.L. Agarwal ) Mr. Rinesh Gupta ) Mr. S.P. Poshwal, Counsel for the respondents By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The plaintiff/petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction in respect of disputed property against the defendant/respondents, along with the application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2, C.P.C., which was dismissed by the trial Court. The order of trial Court refusing to grant injunction was affirmed by the appellate Court. Hence, this writ petition has been preferred by the plaintiff challenging the impugned orders passed by both the Courts below. Learned counsel for the parties have argued the case and after considering their submissions in the light of findings of fact recorded by both the Courts below, I do not find any ground to interfere in the concurrent finding of fact recorded by both the Courts below. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/