® ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No. t4J /2011 INW.P.fONo. 7733/2010 PETITIONERS A ^ G.R. Baghel, S/o- Late Shri L.S. Baghel, ^^ ^' RESPONDENTS 1. /yy ^ Aged about 58 years, .-•"tey./ 2. 3. Tehsildar, Presently working in District Office, Kanker, Distt. Kanker, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through-Secretary, '.% Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Collector, Mahasamund, Distt.-Mahasamund, C.G. Board ofRevenue, Through-Registrar, Raipur, C.G. L^> PETITION FOR RESTORATION OF THE WRIT PETITION.NO. 7733/2010 DISMISSED VIDE ORDER DATED 10.03.2011 FOR WANT OFPROSECUTION ^^f ^|Nld<ll, WTltWT^, fa<ni^ll< ^n^r 'q^? 1-IMC'II 9b^l<^ f^^y* 200 STT^T^T ^rii<=n 'STI^T st)Hich <-i%a l»n»: Sahu 3^r •^<Ty8[R ^rfN S.B. Uon'ble Shri tlusttce 1N.K. Aeftrwal fk ndt 24.03.2011 Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Adv^cate Shri Sanjeev Agrawal, Panel Heard on application for resto^-ation Leamed counsel appearing counsel for the petitioner could mistake, therefore, WP(C) No. 773^ 10.03.2011, may be restored to its oi|iginal On due consideration, I petitioner has succeeded in explain^ therefore, the application is allowejd restored to its original file. A copy ofthis order be place4 and the same be listed for hearing. chi<Li(<1^1ri 'Hl^i^ff 1ff t^t <^i^i< '^^yf^pT ^rr^T for petitioner. I^a^yer for the State. ofWP(C)No. 7733/2010, the petitioner submits that the c|t appear on accouiit of bonafide lp/2010, which was dismissed on [file. rsk satisfied that the counsel for |ng the cause of his,/her absence, and WP(C) No. 7733/2010 is on record ofthe original petition Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge r^ -^feq