IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4114 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 24924 OF 2009. Navinbhai Kanjibhai ..... ..... ... Applicant. V/s Vajayaben Devabhai D.H.2 Babubhai Devabhai & Ors. ..... ... .. ..Respondents. Ms.P.U.Badadare, Adv. for the applicant. Ms.Teja Katdare, Adv. for the respondents. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE AND SMT. R.P. SONDUR-BALDOTA, JJ. 23rd March, 2010. PC: By the present application the appellant is seeking condonation of delay of 443 days in filing the appeal. We have perused the application for condonation of delay. We do not see any cause, much less sufficient, to justify condonation of delay. According to learned counsel for the applicant/appellant the cause for delay is stated in para 5. No reason as such is spelt out. What is stated in para 5 is that the applicant had been to Mumbai for some other legal work and during discussion the question of pending execution proceedings was discussed and as the present advocate advised filing of first appeal same is filed. We fail to understand as to how come this could be said to be sufficient cause for explaining delay in filing the appeal. The delay is inordinate and not properly explained. Hence application for condonation of delay stands rejected. 23.3.2010.