1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 30.06.2011 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD).No.6990 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 C.Anandha Kumar : Petitioner Versus 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, 807, IInd Floor, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. 2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Madurai Division, Madurai. : Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to permit the petitioner to undergo the Second Medical Test by considering the representation (appeal) dated 25.02.2011, within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner :Mr.S.Subbiah For Respondents :Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen Additional Government Pleader O R D E R Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition for a Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to permit him to undergo the Second Medical Test, by considering his representation (appeal) dated 25.02.2011, within a time stipulated by this Court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. In similar circumstances, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents has fairly submitted that the petitioner could be sent for Medical Board for eye test. Therefore, the doctor, once again, could find out whether the petitioner is really suffering from eye defect. On doing so, report will be conveyed to the petitioner and the petitioner, if found to be normal, he would be considered to the post of Sub Inspector of Police. 5. In view of the said submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, the first respondent is directed to fix the date on which the petitioner could appear before the Medical Board for eye test so as to find out whether his eyes are normal. If it is found that the petitioner does not suffer from any defect in the eyes, it is needless to say that the first respondent has to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Sub Inspector of Police. 6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (T&P) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, 807, IInd Floor, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. 2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Madurai Division, Madurai. +1cc to the Special Govt.Pleader, Sr.No.20413 sml ssk/12.07.2011 /4c-2p/- Order made in W.P.(MD).No.6990 of 2011 Dated: 30.06.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/