; ZTO BEFORE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR zs^- PETITIONER: - ^ ^^ 'A<^''' WRIT PETITION N0.7... ...2006 Single Bench Other Matter MOHAMMAD YAKUB CHAUHAN Aged about 46 years S/0 Late Mohaimnad Ibrahim Chauhan, Office Address New India .^^/ ^)''/<^;'-''' ...•••"' Plastic Center,,Hatri Bazar Durg, C.G, R/0 Near .•^ -\ k>''' ..••"''^«yyt' Sahu Sadan, Kelabadi Durg, Tah. & Distt. (C.G) ^->^>' VERSUS RESPONDENTS: -1. CIfflATTISGARH STATE WAKF BOARD THROUGH: - CfflEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Chhattisgarh Wakf Board, C-12, Sector - 3, Devendra Nagar, Raipur, Tah. & Distt Raipur (C.G) 2. THE COLLECTOR DURG, C.G. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER fREVENUE) AND ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT ;? ^ .cP^f; COMMISSIONER WAKF DISTT. DURG C.G. «^ -'.l^ . V ^- »^u4- SHRI- ALI MOHAMMAD KHAN y \J^ ^''' 6' JOINT-COLLECTOR, DURG, C.G. Collectorate Building Durg, Tah. & Distt."Durg, C.G. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA w,~,wts'w'!:~^K'"!!!!. XI-HC-78 sn^r^rfeN? tW sn^T BiiiN) f *11^^TTSh*1|ct» s^'-iiraRra', ®Tfi«'is,Riciiti^ __^-/, ^2-?~7 ^ 200 C, l MSIW (l?tl3°t'iisT) STgrwtifersTi^r Shri V.G. Tamaskar, lei Shri Saajay S. State/respondent. jraed counsel for tlie petitioner. leamed G.A. for the Agt^wal By fhis petition fh.e pe elected MutwaJU of flie Inte: llitioner claiiniag himsetf to be fhe Durg (C.G.) has prayed fc| respondents to haiid Qver, the^ Jama Masjid, Durg (C.G.) to tjl The petitioner claiais tl( the post of Mutavalli was fixe4 Boai-d on 17.3.2006. Ho^ representati.ve froia ftie W^ 17.3.2006, llierefore, eleclji Subsequently on 21.4.2006 own conducted aa electiot petitioner for tlie above representatious were sent tt> liaildiag over Uie charge, of +l<lfd^ KINdl'fffe^ <Rl+dl< ^srf^liTsn^r (auiiya Coiniuittee, Jama Masjid, issuaace of direcGon to fhe chsu'ge of Intezamiya Cominittee, fie petltioner. lat irtitiaUv tlie date of election for by the member of fhe State Waqf 'ever, the said nieinber or any \- iqf Boari did not tuni up on ion could not be conducted. the miis1im coinniuiiity ou fheir of MufavaUi and elected flie post unaiiimously. Several fhe respondeuts rcquesthig for lie coDliuittee but tlie same were XI-HC-78 3t^5T%r8Flfe traraii^isbHi* *TI*I^I aiwh 3STsn?n^pT, ®Tfl«'is,|siciitiy t^.'./7,. .5.2.S"1/ ^^ W1[ 200 C, Sii^ifi latti {li?l'd°l';l?sr) ?TcTRKflf?cT3n^T not considered. The Sub nienio of Arinexurc P/6 Coinniissioner, Waqf Board Cbief Executive Of&cer of r letter of fhe petitioner wifh a on fh.e poiats raised in the a^ Lcamed coiinsel for pMsioual Ofllcer (Revenue) vide £Uld the Additional Assistant Udressed a communication to the sspondent No. 1, forwaj-ded fhe -equest to take actioii as per rules IpUcation offhe petitioner. petitioner is a vaMdly elec| however, fhe respondents ai( cominittee to him., fherefopj in.stant petition. Leamed counsel for th]i fhe judgment of fh.e M.P. HJ|! Abdul Kadir and otfaers VsJ be given to the respondents coicuiiittee to fhe petittouer. ^irafepft-T WRrf^'te<^ d^Rzrc ^; STf^T SII^T pie petitioner subnuts that the ed MutwaUi of the coininittee, not haading over charge of fhe , he was coinpeUed to file fhe petitiouer places his reliance on gh Court ill fhe ruatter of Gulam Collector, Durfi aad ofbets and subinits that ia fhe aforesaiH. circuin.stances, a direction inav br handing over tlie charge of the P.T.O. XI-HC-78 •sn^r^rfera; (CT aii^r si*iich c- *1W<^Ta)+1|cb 3^^ipn?pT, ©Tn^iis,isi<"fiy^< .!/y;-.6....f2.2-5?}.. ^? ^ 200 & 3n^?T iraq? (^if^cf^iiT) ??aTmgftcT3n^r I have heard leamed coi From. fhe docuinents £ with his petiuon, it is observei of fhe Waqf Board vide order AU Mohd. Khaa, Joiat CoBed is currentlv holdiag tlie char CoHlluittee, Jacaa Masjid, Du| aanexed aav docuiaent to d| (nsel for fhe petitioner. i^lduced by the petitioner alons II that ftie Chief Executive Officer |of Anuexure P/ 1 had appouited ^>r, Durg as actuig Mutwalli who be of Mutwalli of ttie Intezamiya ^g (C.G.). The petitioner has not bmonstrate that he was elected Mut'.vaUi of tlie Coiriinittee intezamiva CoBiruittee. So far as the judgiuenl concenied, in. fnat case it 4l 11 Com.inittee was held in Uie vej about the sacue and in the affc considering (hat the appoiat^u.' arraugeuient, directed ftie re( elected Mubvalli. Howevef, 'niltcKfl-l *111tlTfffecfl'tf^RZTC ^a'I^q'Sl^TT Im. a dulv Iield ineetiug of tlie reUed upon by the petitioner is ppears fhat the election of the u- 1983 aud there was ao dispute >resaid circumstaiices, the Court a.ent of Coinniittee was stop-gap ipondents on the petitioii of fhe in fhe present case no such XI-HC-78 an^TqiTl^IR? TOT3lR?T't>HI* r y\^. ^ T5^ •<ll'i11<-l<l, 9TnW16, (slCIWy iTTOWgTlltaF'^*'^'''51'^'4"'"^ 200 ^ 3li^)!l 14a«>(Tpi3g^8T) ?<<nw(rf?tT3fi^r contiiigency exists, therefo m.8taiice of fhe petitioner (e, fhe uistaat petition at the caafaot be entertamed. In fhe result, fhe app Uable to be dismissed at tlie accordiugly disinissed. *wfd41-f iWRrr'fffc><f) <Riui<. ^srf^Tsn^r al beiag devoid of substance is adinission stage itsetf and is Sd/- Dhu'endra Mishra Judge P.T.O.