* 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1352 OF 2010 [FOR EXPEDITIOUS HEARING] IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 465 OF 2007 Shri. Nirmal Meghraj Jain and anr. .....Applicants v/s. The State of Maharashtra [at the instance of L.T. Marg Police Station, Bombay] .....Respondent * * * * Mr. Manoj Bhatt, Advocate for the applicants. Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, APP for State-respondent. CORAM :- Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. 22 November, 2010. P.C. :- 1. This is an application filed for expeditious hearing of the appeal filed by the original complainant against the acquittal. The only ground made out in the application is that in view of the pendency of the appeal, the property stolen from the shop of the applicants has not been returned to them. It appears that part of * 2 * the gold articles required by the investigating agency has been returned and the remaining gold articles were not returned on account of want of identification. Considering the nature of the grounds made out in the application which do not justify expeditious hearing of the appeal by getting precedence over all other older pending matters, the application is rejected. [SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J]