^ p ft ^ ff:'^ g ^% g r^g-! ^ in^r^u IN THE H!G!I CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.R(S') N0. A^5°^ /2Q10 PEIITIQ^LER, vX> ^^c ..A^~ ^- -:^> rs^^ Kashi P^am Netam S/o Dev Sin.gh Net.am, Aged about 36 years, Upper Divisioii Teachsr,, Govemmeiit Middle School NarodJii, Block- S.Lohara, Distt. Kabirdliam- (C.0.) ,^- LSUS RESPOND_ENTS € 1. State of Chliattisgarh through Secretar^?, Departmeiit of Eelucation, D.K.S. Bhawan, P^aipiir. Distt. P^aipur (C.G.) 2. r The Director PiibHc Instroction, CMiattisgarh Govermneiit P^eip'oi^ Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3." The District Educatioii officer, Distt.Kabirdliam- (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA —78 '3~5ET ^ww^ ^iftwre, [®i<rfray ..\^:.^i^...^^iL^200 ^T^T'q^T (^3^^) ^^r^T^T^i^ ^^TW^T^HT^ I^T^R ^ft-cT ^lt^I 8B : HON'BLE MR. JUSTECE PRtTINKER DIWAK.BR OS. 11.2010 Shri Deepak JaiB., couasel Smt. Smita Ghai, P.L. for tl^e The petitiouer, who wa^ Assistant Tea.ch.er under the Scll 25.6.1994 (Anj3exxire P/1) is a| respoD.d.e'nts in not a.d.diuR two even Aough he did. his D.Ed* Mandal, Raipur at his own cos"| seekijig peniiission, for th.e sam.^ Couusel. fbr the petitioiier ] entETl.ed. for two ad.van.ee iiicrein^ Exaiiiitiation certificate, in. accd Circular dated 24.12.98 aiid m v| Supreine Court in. the m-atter o| Badiiiiarayaii Acharc/a and azid Yashwant Ku.mar Biiardw^ Durg aiid.another reported H:I 20| On tiie other haad, counj erst^vhile State of Madhya 22.10.1964 allowed advaiice goveniment seryaats who pr| 22.10.1964 whefher at his own However, who proceeded 011 get two aiin.iial. m.crem.e.nts only ^ a.dvan.ce ftoin. oth^rs traiijinig ^r^fo^fh' "RTR^ff ^' 'fe^ 'tf^^R '^3fR:R3^T br the petitMner, State. appom.t.ed ou the post of i.ool Educa.ti.on Depart.nient on Igrieved by tlie actioii. of tii.e ivan.ee m.crem.en.ts in. hi.s saimy C.G. Madhyamik' Sh&sha. m. the year ...lun.e 2005 eAer rom. ttie deDartzoeD.t, subiiiits tliat tlie petitioner i.s ^nts as h.e had, obtained D.Ed idance with the piDvisions of .ew of the judgments of Hont^le ~ State of M.P. & An.oth.er Vs. reported m 19.96 SC 2779 U Vs. Muiiicipal. . Coiyoration, )6 (II) MPJR 96 (CG). sel for the State submit.s that >rades.h vide circiilai' dated iiicreiiients only to those >ceeded for traio.m.g up to ;ost or at the govero.meiit cost. on or aiter 23.1.0. 1964 caa the •fcraming i.s a,.t his cost axi.d ^ rr' T '^/'. '^.".^^•^I-HC—78 HWW^ ^nW^ ^^f •^I^IC'1'^, ^t1!<H^|(o, [®i(ril^y _ U'^-^ C\^-€3^T/^P ••^2 ^T?^¥TTR1^' (^f^^) 3?F^T "^F f^il^ nm^T^T^^IW '^IT^T ^ftn ^T^I not at the cost of the Govem 23.10.1964 was superceded vid^ Goveminent vide notifi.cated d.; Non-Gazette Class-II Educationail Recni.itiD.ent and Promotion Rul< B,T.I, or B.Ed degree for appoixi.1 Teacber. The petitioner woulp io.crements only in tlie conditi B.T.I/B.Ed./B.T.I. degree at hisj obtaiaiiig permission fonn tlie d to 1.3,99. To clarify the above ^ been issued on 6.2,2007 and on Facts, as detailed above, Uie inatter of Yashwaiit Kuniar | discussm.g th.e .circulars dated. upon the jud.gia.ent of fh.e Ho3i7t| Ba.drm.arayaa Achanra's case (^ not assistant teachers aione, wc|i increnicnts on obtaining B.Edj 22.10.1964, as tiie circular prescri.be any outer Imiit of fhe & B,TJ. certificate. It has been 1.3,99 is applicable to only Assi.{ oflier teachers (UDT). <^i^w4i^ ^ro^ff ^f "fe^ Tf^$R ^-3?f?R^i^T ibient.^riiis clrcu.Iar of dated order dated 10.12.1975. The ijted 16.6.1973 aineaded M.P. Servkles (Non-coitege Ser^ices) js, 1993 added qualification of ^aient on the post of Assistaut be entiUed for advaiice bn fhat he had obta.ined his own cost duilaR se.rvice after ^partment between 23,10.1964 |ositioii, crrcule^s have alr'eady ^0.1.09. re not m. dispu.te. This Cou.il iii Bharadwaj (supra) elaborately 24.12.98, 1.3.99 and relymg |le Apex Cou.rfc ia. ihe m.atter of upra) U.as held tliat teachers, uld be entitled to two a.d.vaace exam.in-atioii certifi.ca.te after dated 22.10.1964 does not period of obtaimng B,Ed, M.Ed furtlier. held that circular dated $tant Tea.ch.ers (LDT) an.d not to ^ ^' ^•; :'^::^^%. '.A '^» XI-HC—78 -g'sr -qiqi^^ '^ftw^, fsRira^; ...y-:.£-..^.i..^.:..^yT (^ e;Tr^i-^^( ^r ^m 3^ ^^-t^ I^T^T^JN^I^ Shri Das fairly submits fh^ YashwaQt Kumar Bharadwaj's c^ and ca.se of ftie petitioner in covered by the above- judgiDje 24.12.1998. For the aforesaid reasons, paysB.ent of fevo advaace iacreiae^its of the petitioner's D.Ed. examii are a.ccordmgly directed to :m| increnients to the petitioiier froa examination, withia a period However, this order shall be sul)} tlie State regarding facts pleade^ No order as to costs. ^Prf^N^T "W^ff ^* fe^ Tf^T?gK '^'3?fw3?i^r |it prmciple of law lai.d down. •ia ^se fsiipra} has atl^iued finaJit)7 IMS petitiou is also squarely ijent as also circular dated jthe petitioner is entitled to the from t'he date of declaration ^ation result. The respondents ^lce payinent of to¥o advaace fhe date ofher passmg D.Ed. of foiir months froxii today. ject to all verifications izia.de by in tlie petitioii. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge