IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32162 of 2008 Bishnu Sharma, son of Late Anup Lal Sharma, village Baluganj, PS Balrampur, Dist. Katihar – Petitioner. Vs. 1) The State of Bihar, 2) Agam Lal Sharma, son of Late Mahesh Lal Sharma, village Baluganj, PS Balirampur, Dist. Katihar – Opp. Parties. 2 1.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties The petitioner has challenged the order, dated 15.1.2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Katihar in Complaint Case No. 292/2006 by which cognizance has been taken for the offences alleged to have been committed under sections 467 and 471 of the Penal Code. The allegations in the complaint petition is that at the behest of the petitioner, the Munshi of the civil court has got the bail bonds of co-accused filled up by persons who were not alive and as such has committed the offences under the aforesaid sections of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as far as the petitioner is concerned, his bailor was a genuine person and as such it cannot be presumed that he was the person instrumental in getting different persons to impersonate the bailers of co- accused persons. It is submitted that this part of the allegation does not ring true and seems improbable. It is difficult to imagine that the petitioner has produced genuine bailors for himself and instigated others to produce false persons as bailors. Each accused is responsible for producing his own bailor and complying with 2 the order by which he has been granted bail. In the circumstances I quash the impugned order of cognizance as far as this petitioner is concerned. This application is allowed. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)