$E§%m §§E§§€§w§ BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ‘WRIT PETITION S N0. $5.0 [2010. é’ ,v" PETITIONER 2 P.K. Sharma.S/o. Late Shri Rajaram Sharma, raged about 50 years, Executive Officer Grade—l, Antyavyavasayi Cooperative, Finance and Development, Biiaspur, R/o. 44, Guru Vihar Colony, Jebdapara, Sarkanda, Biiaspur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. «I Chhattisgarh State Antyavyavasayi Cooperative, Finance and Deveiopment Corporation, Raipur, through it’s Managing Director. MPWt’wr 2. FCoiiector cum President, District Antyavyavasayi Cooperative, Finance and Development Corporation, Biiaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON$ITUTION OF INDIA W WWWW WWW ammm B: Hon’ble shri Manindra 16.07.2010 Mrs. Naushina Ali, coun el for the petiu'oner. Heani. Submission of learned ounsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner who is working as xecutive OEcer Grade—I in respondent— Corporation, under the Tribal epartment of the State Government, is eligible for promoiion to the n higher post of Chief Executive O$cer and is Within the zone of consi eration, but the case of the petitioner is not being considered on accou t of pendency of departmental enquiry, Wh1ch has been kept pendmg mce long Without anv fault on the part of the petitioner Learned counsel for e peu'tioner further submitted that representations have been ade to respondent No.1 for early conclusion of enquiry and co sidering the case of the petitioner, but the same has also not been de ided till date. Taking into considerati n the nature of reliefs sought in the petition, it would be appropria to nnally disposed OE the petition With diiection to respondents—Corp ration to consider and take appropriate dec1510n on petitioners repres ntations dated 31 3 2O 10 (Annexure P— 5) & 195 2010 (Annexure - — ) m accordance With law Within a reasonable period. The petition 1s accordin y hnally disposed on‘ With the aforesaid direction Sdl- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava 1 Judge S M ban shxivastava J.