^s ^' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Pefitioners Ptaintjffs Respondents Defendants Civil Revision No. 119 of 2005 1. Kamla Devi, aged 70 years, W/o Late Girja Shanker Mahadeo Pd. Mishra 2. Rajendra Kumar, aged 46 years, S/o Late Girja Shanker Mishra, aged 46 years-Occupation-L.D.C. PWD, Electric Section, Bilaspur (CG) Both R/o House No.14/407, Side Lane of Vikrama Super Market, Bidhya Nagar, Bilaspur (CG) Versus 1. Smt Manisha Mishra, aged 35 years, Occup^ion-Service, W/o Late Prabhat Mishra, 2. Vishal Mishra, aged about 4 years, S/o Late Prabhat Mishra through guardian Mother-Smt Manisha Mishra Both R/o At present Shukrabari, Opposite to Gudhiyari Girls Schoot, Raipur Distt. Raipur (CG) Revjsion under Section 115 oICPC Present: Shri Abhay Tiwari, counset for the applicants. Shri Rajeev Shrivastava with Ms. Monalisa Chhatterjee, counsel for the non-applicants. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 01.10.20)8) Learned counsel for tfie applicants sought permission to withdraw this civil revision on the ground that he would make an application before the AddiUonal District Judge for review of the order dated 30.08.2005 on the ground that the relief of possession was not claimed by the applicants/plaintiffe. tt was further submitted by the learned counsel for the appticants that if the Additional District Judge would, for non-payment of Courts fees, reject the application under c'o/<-*«---2. / 'l'-; ^ \;-, Jf?J 1- Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC, he would prefer an appeal against the said order. (2) ~ Prayer is not opposed. (3) In view of the submission, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn. Leamed counsel for the applicants is at liberty to take steps which are available to him under law. Sd/- ^ Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukli Judge Priya 'y»