IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH AUGUST 2010 / 27TH SRAVANA 1932 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2848 of 2004(A) -------------------------------------------- CRA.377/1999 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, THALASSERY CC.864/1997 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-II, KANNUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ---------------------------------------------------- T.V.RAJEEVAN, S/O.KRISHNAN, AGED 41 YEARS, T.V.HOUSE, P.O.MADAMBAN, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.PAREETH SMT.M.SONA RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS: -------------------------------------------------- 1. K.V.KRISHNAN, S/O.KUNHAPPA, KAVILA VEEDU, MYLADATHAZHA, AZHIKODE, KANNUR. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.REKHA.C.NAIR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/08/2010 , THE COURT ON SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: KL. P.S.GOPINATHAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.R.P.No.2848 of 2004. = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 18th day of August, 2010. O R D E R The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petitioner had already undergone the sentence and he is not any more pressing the revision petition. The submission of the learned counsel is recorded. Having gone through the judgments of the courts below, I find that the revision petitioner issued Ext.P1 cheque in discharge of the liability which was dishonoured for insufficient funds when presented for collection and despite the notice issued, the liability was not discharged. The revision petitioner has no good defence at all. The courts below had correctly appreciated the evidence and come to a right conclusion of guilt. I find no merit in the revision petition. It is accordingly dismissed. P.S.GOPINATHAN, (Judge) Kvs/-