3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. NO.^S^T4 /2006 PETITIONER v^ .-,,-y' 4^- .<»> .">,'-.'~" "<? /^v" Aa* RESPONDENTS Mrs. Lata Pandey ^ Wd/o. Late Vijay Kumar Pandey ^ Aged about 43 years, R/o. Rajmahal Campus Ward No. 6, Kawardha, Tahsil Kawardha, District. Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs and Secretary Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of M.P. Through Secretary Vallabh Bhawan, ,.co^ ^^ ; 'p ^'' Bhopal(M.P.) Union of India Through Secretary Department of Personnel Public Grievance Third FloorZo/C-Aav^y< G^a^'m,^^'~> A%?T^S<I' -~ A/eii.S-^e^/-.-^ WRIT PETIT10N UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA + XI-HC-22 ^g '^iraRpi, 'g^frms, fa'nitiy an^r^r K-i\<h Sf^f 5tl+lf<^ V^ ^- s iimwi thlich "W^ 200 ^^ET' sn^i^giw ^rfttt CoUrt isn Petitioner by Shri Sudhir Verm^, Shri Vivek Sharma, P.L., for With consent, heard finaliy. This case .reiates to consegyent upon the death of an em^ Learned counsei for the the death of theemployee has 1-1-1-1997 and not earlier. It is furth^r cases bearing W.P. No.1.322/2002 orders have been passed bythis that similar orders may be passed in Learned counsel for the StaN fact and states that the State of Chhs to consider the cases of dependarfts died on or after 1/11/1997 strictly prevalent at that time. He however for issuing necessary orders may be In view of the submissionst appearing for the parties, without merits of the case, in the opinion of be sen/ed if a directiori is given to the authorities concerned to considdr petitioner in accordance with the p4 death of the emptoyee concerned. appointment orders wil1 be issued a4 withln 4 months from the date of this order. The petitioner is aiso operation to the authorities. 'lt is mat still remains, the petitioner may ava| the law inclyding'filing otthe petition c^impassionate loyee sen/ing in the State. categorically stated that, ocfturred on 6/4/1999 i.e. after submitted that in bateh 6f |nvolving the same question on 20/12/2005. He prays Ihis case also, does not dispute the above i^ttisgarh has taken-a decision of those employees who accordance with the policy slubmits that four months time disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the'State counsel commynicate the order to the ctii<4[(n<ilri 'HTO^Tf ^ 'fe1^ <f<i-^i< i? sipOT ail^r Advocate. StateofC.G.. e)<pressi liven. made by iearned cbunsel >ing any opinion on the i|his Court, erids ofjustice will :he State of Chhattisgarh and and decide the case of the iicy prevalent at the time of the petitioner found eligibie, early as possible preferably pt>duction/recejpt of a copy of directed to render due co- (le clear that if any grievance the remedy available under before this Court. ttlons, this petition stands- who for be obliged -<o Sdf- Fakhruddin Judge ^fi'^^^ ry-1 ^Xi N^