IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.1677 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : February 02, 2010. Gurvinder Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Rakesh Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 28.12.2009, communicated on 1.1.2010 (Annexure P-2), whereby respondent No.4 has been ordered to be transferred to Tarn-Taran Range, Amritsar Division “on vacant post”. The petitioner's case is that he is already working against the afore-mentioned single post in Tarn-Taran Range and there being no other vacant post available to adjust respondent No.4, the petitioner is likely to be effected by the impugned transfer order. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length, I am of the considered view that no interference with the impugned C.W.P.No .1677 of 2010 (O&M) 2 order dated 28.12.2009 is called for by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction except to observe that the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the departmental authorities who shall immediate take cognizance of his grievance. With the liberty afore-stated, the writ petition is dismissed. Dasti. 02-02-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE