HEGH CGKERT 9F CHEATTE$GARH A? BIL§SVHE§ $3 : HmN’ELE $E§RI JUSTEQE ?R§’£‘EMKER BIWAKER wy. Na {$273 i3$4maw g’ETITEQNF-JR Dhansai Sahu, agea about (3C ysars, Sic. Che 'Jaiam Sahu, EX—Sarpaxlch, RIO. Village Bhamaibhatta, 13.0, Aasra, Tejhsil Dongargaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) RE$POI¥BENT$ 1 . Stam of Chhattisgarh, Thmugh Secmtary, Pallchayat & Rural Devalopme11t Deptt. D . K. S. Bhawzm, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) Collgctor, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG [O PETETEQ2€ vNBER ARTXCL‘E 227 @F TEE CON$TETUTION OF 1NDKA A§gea§anc$ Shn‘ H.S.Ah1uwa'i1'a, counsel for the pefitioxmr. Shri Alum Sac, Govt. Advocats for ths State. ORAL ORDER {03.04.2309§ The grievance of the petitioner is that m a proceeding before the Collector, initiaHy an appeai was flied unde; Section 91 of the CG. Panchayat. Raj A&hiniyam, 1393. However, subsequently an application. was f11e& for conversion of that appeal into refereece under Section 21(4) ‘ of tinePanchayat Raj Atihiniyam. The contention of the petitioner is that the Stay application is pending eince ) /’w 3) 19.01.2009 and no oxder has been passed on that application. 011 the other hand, learned counsel for the State has 110 objection if a directisn is issued to me Couecior to decide the said comrersioa application Within three weeke fram ihe receip‘t of the order of this Court. H. would be the duty of the petitioner to supply a certified copy of the order amd to obtajrl the acknowledgement. It is being made dear that no oiainion has been expressed by this Court on merits and the Collector would be at liberty to decide the application ia accorclance Wizh the provisions of law. , , Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker 3 w Judge