.^ .i Pfiya HIGH COURT OF CHHAniSGARHLBlLASPUR Single Bench: Hon'bte Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Aoollcant Non-applicants Criminalltevlslon No, 159 of2006 Rakesh Mourya, S/oShri Shivshankar Mourya, aged about 32 years, R/o Near Mour/a Complex, Gurunanak Chowk, Torwa Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG) Versus 1. Smt Chandana Mourya, W/o Rakesh Mourya, aged about 26 years, resident of Gurunanak Chowk, Torwa, District Bilaspur (CG) 2. Aashish Mourya, S/o Rakesh Mourya, aged about 3 years, Through Smt. Chandana Mourya (respondent No.1) Both present address C/o K.P. Rai, Near Railway Station, Railway Station, Bhatapara City, District Raipur (CG) Cnminal revisioiL under Section 397 of Cr.P.C Present: Shri Hemant Kesarwani, counsel for the applicant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 18.03.2009) l-1eard on admission. (2) The applicant is aggrieved by the order dated 26.08.2004 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Batoda Bazar (CG) in criminal reviston No. 454/2003, whereby maintenance of Rs.800/- was awarded to the non- applicarrt No.1 from the date offiling ofthe revision i.e. 12.11.2003. (3) On perusal of the record as also the impugned order, t am of the considered opinion that the flnding recorded by the 2 Additionat Sessions Judge that the applicant had sufflcient cause to refuse to live with her husband is well merited. So far as the quantum of oompensation awarded to the non-applicant No.1 is conoerned, learned counsel for the appticant submitted that the same is not under ohallenge. (4) In this view of the matter, 1 am of the considered opinion that there is no merit in this revision, which is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. Sdl- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge