IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 4458 of 2010. Decided on: 12th August, 2010. Chet Ram. ….. Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Prakash and Mr. Devender Sharma, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: i) Issue writ of mandamus for direction to the respondent-department to consider the case of the petitioner and grant him work charged status w.e.f. 1994, and regularize his service as per the policy of State Government. ii) Issue writ of mandamus for direction to the respondent-department to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization with all consequential service benefits, with effect from the day the petitioner completed ten years of service as daily wager on the post of Mali i.e. the year 1994. 2. According to the petitioner, his case is covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya Versus 2 State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supplement (2) Supreme Court Cases 316. Therefore, it is for the petitioner to file an appropriate representation before the second respondent, in which case, the second respondent will look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law. In the event of such representation being filed within a period of one month from today, the matter will be considered by the second respondent in accordance with law, within a period of another four months. 3. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 12th August, 2010 (bhupender/K.Attri)