IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 17763 of 2010 Date of decision: 26.08.2010 Jaggar Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of UT Chandigarh and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Ms Indu Bala, Advocate for Mr. Gurave Bhayyia, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Hemant Bassi, Advocate for UT Chandigarh -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) It is contended that even though the gold and cash was recovered from the mother of the alleged accused in the present case, the said recovery has not been shown in the investigation. Representation to this effect was also made to respondent No. 2 by the petitioner vide Annexure P-3. Heard. Respondent No. 2- SSP, Chandigarh is directed to look into the allegations made by the petitioner in his representation dated 23.06.2010 and decide the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order. In case, the said allegations are found to be correct, necessary action be taken against the guilty person. Disposed of. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge August 26, 2010 mohan