^ XI-HC—78 *lt*1<tl ^HS^tl ^^r^j^i<ri4, ^Ttl^^Ko/ (^<ni^^< -....^p.l.i •-^200 W^T ^W (<ic<t^<i^) 3T^l ^RT i^-li<=b ^T^ ^n^i ^RW 'F^cn^ ^if^T 3lT^T PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS; -Velrsus- 7. 8, ^j^fd^l'1 ^iH<nT ^ [k^€\ipsi^K ^7 3tR!R 3TT^T S.D. Bhatpai'e, Age about 55 yeai's, Pi-mcipal, S/o late Shri B.R. Bhatparc, Govt. Hr. Sec. School Piperclihedi, Distt. Raipm' (CG) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Tlirough The Secretaiy/Under Secretan^ Trible DepaitmLent, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur Distt, RaipurjC.G.) \. The Director Public Iiistruction Office D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipiir Distt. Raipzir(C.G.) M.L. Choudhaiy, Govt. High School BliairaBigarli, Distiict Bijapur (CG) K.R. Tondon, Govt. Hr. Sec. School Umarali, Distt, Korba (CG) Deep Chaiid Khandel, Govt. Hr. Sec. School Kailepal (Bastauar), Distt. Bastar (CG) Rajendra Patil, Govt. Hi\ Sec. School Chiiidgarh, Distt. Daatewada (CG) Kashi Raoi Dhamgay, Govt. Hr. Sec. School Usur, Distt. Bijapur (CG) Slariraiii Raj Bhaskai', Govt Hr, Sec. Scliool Maaendragarh, Distt, t. .<s^^A^ f^%3&. ^ •^s XI-HC—78 ^^[ ^iMKn^ ^Til^4i<o, f^<ni^^< HPKtl 'gh*11^» "^200 31I^TTRW (1(^33^) 3^1'^T^FTW ?T^T 3TR^T ^RT^T 9. 10. (Writ Petition under Article BmMle Bench: Hon?Me Koriya (CG) Kamal Das Bhaskar, Govt. Hr. Sec. School Khadgaon, Distt. Koriya (CG) Shankar Nayak, Govt Hr. Sec. School Kapasi, Distt. Kaiiker 2p6 of the Constitution of India) $hri Dhireadra Mishra^ J. 5-1-2009:- Shri Ajay Shrivastava, couns| Shri Rakesh Jha, Deij State/respondents No.l and 2. Heard, By this petition, tlie petitioi]] responclents to consider tiie accordiag to fhe petitioner, Ibelow in the gradation Ust have |been denied proniotion. Leained counsel Ibr the p| Ipressiag tliis petition at this stagej |to respondents No. 1 and 2 to decic^ |ftie petitioner against his superses< Learo.ed counsel for responc| |case tlie petitioner files fresh Ibefore respoudents No, 1 a-ud 2 wit ctis<4(<n<fl<i ^w^T"^ fs^l <P»i^i< '^3tRm3TI^?T id for the petitioner. ^iity Govt. Advocate for the ?r has prayed for a direction to the re^resentatioii of tlie petitioner, as No.3 to 10, who are down promoted aiid tlie petitioner has resp^ndents bejen fctitioner siibmitted fhat he is not However, he prays for a dix'ection |e representation ofAnnexure-P/4 of ^ion. leuts No.l and 2 submitted that io. agaiust his super-sessioa ihin a period of .10 days from today, repr^sentatiou J;--^'3^, ^-/^t-HC—78 3^r^T Rr'iN ^sff3^rsp?NF y" Barve '3'^ ^l<<ia^, ®tl1-y<l<o,[sK'll'H^. *11*RtT%»*ll<R ^200 a^r tRW (<^{'l<<^) ^"CTW^^ ^H^T -3- ^rofeT^"w^ ^*fe^ ^f^$?? ^3tf^3n^F tlie saine sh.aU be considei'ed ar withiu a fiirther peiiod of 6 representation. In view of tlie siibniissid parties, the instaiit petition is d| to nialce a fresh representation tj period of 10 days from. today. the petitionen the sam-e respondents No.l aiid 2 wifliiiij date of receipt of representatic^ notice to the iaterested parties. niade bv learaed counsel for the |sposed ofwitli Mbei-ty to tlie petitiouer |efore rcspondeuts No.l and 2 wifhin a (|)n such repxese.ntatiou being made by be considered aad decided by a furtlier period of 6 weeks froin the i, iii accordan.ee witli law, affer due shfeU loia |.d decided by respondents No.l aiid 2 |weeks from the date of receipt of Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge