sns 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.821 OF 2011 Somnath H. Bhandvalkar and Ors. ..Applicants. v/s. The State ..Respondent. Mr. Milind Deshmukh, adv. for the Applicants. Mr. Y.M.Nakhwa, APP for the respondent/State. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 4th October, 2011 PC : 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. 2 The applicant seeks anticipatory bail in crime no.163 of 2011 registered with Daund police station for the offences punishable under Sections 326, 323, 341, 506 r/w sec. 34 of the I.P.C. 3 According to the applicant, he was first beaten and when he was going to lodge report with the police, opposite party lodged a report against the applicants first. It is contended that the case registered against the present applicants is false and only it has been filed to defend themselves against the case, which was also registered on the report of the present applicant. However, medical report of the first informant Santosh Kadam reveals that he had suffered in all seven injuries, out of which there were four incised wounds caused with sharp and cutting weapon, on sns 2 different parts of the body, including parietal bone. Besides that there were also compound fracture of the left parietal bone and fourth metacarpal of the left hand. Taking into consideration the large number of injuries including compound fractures , it is impossible to presume at this stage that the case against the present applicants is false. 4 Taking into consideration nature of the offence registered against the applicants, application for anticipatory bail stands rejected. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)