IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 16074 of 2010 (O&M) Decided on : 25-05-2011 Rahul Kamboj and others ....Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr.R.K.Malik, Senior Advocate with Ms. Saravpreet , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana MAHESH GROVER, J Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such but some grievance regarding the grant of notional benefits still remains which ought to have been granted to them since they were appointed at a stage later to the persons lower in merit were appointed and since they may be prejudiced on account of certain service benefits they will make a representation to the same effect and in that eventuality the same be considered by the respondents. Hence, the instant petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. In case, a representation is made by the petitioners, the same shall be considered by the respondents in accordance with law. May 25, 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge