1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8515 OF 2009 Shri Piraji Namdeo Sarode ...Petitioner v/s Talegaon Dabhade Municipal Council and others ...Respondents Mr C.T. Chandratre for Petitioner. Mr S. Pathale i/b Mr S.B. Deshmukh for Respondent No.1. Mr S.N. Patil, AGP for Respondent No.3. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND A.R. JOSHI JJ. DATE : 20TH JANUARY 2010. 2 P.C. :- 1] The petitioner was in the service of the respondent No.1  Municipal Council. He retired from service on 31st October 1999. Thereafter, it appears that on 22nd February 2009 he made a representation to the Municipal Council that he was entitled to time bound promotion because of Government Resolution dated 8th June 1995. That request is rejected by the Municipal Council by communication dated 4th April 2009. It is on record that the petitioner was suspended while he was in service on 17th December 1993. Ultimately, the Divisional Commissioner imposed the punishment of withholding three increments on 22nd February 1996 and the petitioner was reinstated in service. He retired from service on 31st October 1999. The Municipal Council, looking at the time bound scheme, found that due to bad record of the petitioner and punishment imposed, he is not entitled for the benefit and therefore time bound scheme benefits are denied to him. We do not find any illegality in the 3 order impugned. Petition is rejected. It is made clear that if according to the petitioner he is entitled to have his pension enhanced for any other reason, the petitioner is at liberty to make representation to the Municipal Council. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. ( JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH ) ( JUSTICE A.R. JOSHI )