IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.5398 of 2008 Between: Smt. K. Sarala W/o. Late Srinivasa Rao, D/o. Venkateswarlu @ Swamulu, F.P. Shop Dealer, Shop No.2, Ananthavaram Village, Yaddanapudi, Prakasam District. ...PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Prakasam District, Ongole. 2 The Collector (CS), Prakasam District, Ongole. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ongole, Prakasam District. 4 The Tahsildar, Yaddanapudi Mandal, Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring (a) the inaction of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ongole in not obeying the final orders of the District Collector, dt. 16.10.2007 in Rc.CS2/3317/2007(b) the inaction of the District Collector, Ongole directing the implementation of his order dt. 16.10.2007 as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and in equitable and violative of the Constitutional provisions of Article 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India and issue any other appropriate writ order or as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and necessary. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.I.GOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.5398 of 2008 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent No.3 in complying with the direction contained in the order dated 16.10.2007 passed by respondent No.1 to complete the enquiry and pass final orders. At the hearing, Sri I.Gopal Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that after filing of the Writ Petition, the petitioner received the order dated 14.02.2008 purported to have been passed by respondent No.3, cancelling the petitioner’s authorization. Since an order was already passed, the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for consideration and the Writ Petition has accordingly become infructuous. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. Liberty is given to the petitioner to avail her remedies against the order dated 14.02.2008 passed by respondent No.3. _______________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 17th March 2008 RRB Copy To: 1 The District Collector, Prakasam District, Ongole. 2 The Collector (CS), Prakasam District, Ongole. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ongole, Prakasam District. 4 The Tahsildar, Yaddanapudi Mandal, Prakasam District. 5 2CCs to GP for Civil Supplies, High Court Buildings (OUT). 6 2CD copies.