g ‘W mgig mm @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR' WRIT PETmON (S) Nomzi§ OF g wIO / 4/ Prashant Yadav S/o late Shri Sarju Ram Yadav, aged about 28 years, R/o Behind Police Line, Shantinagar Bhilai-3, District Durg (C.G.) a$12f//. PETlTlONER VERSUS / 1. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, .Through: the Secretary, Danganiya, Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS : Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board, Through: the Secretary, Shakti Bhawan, Jabalpur (M,P.) of India, Through: the Secretary; Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension (State Re—organization Cell), lll Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Kahn 1 r, Market, New Delhi. N 3. Union WRIT PETlTlON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUSICERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. 2/9”” HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (S) No. 2235 oizqm PETITIONER : Prasham Yadav. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Chham'sgarh Stata Electricity Bowd & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARnCLE 226 OF THE CONsmUTIQN OF INDIA SB: Hon’ue sm Satish K. Agnilum-I, J. Present: ~ Shri Rakesh i’andey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Anand Verma, Advocate for the respondem No. 3. ‘ ORAL ORDER (Passed 011mm, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appeating for the petitioner, v on instmctions, seeks pennission ofthis Court to with¢aw this petition with liberty file a better petition. 2. It is ordered as prayed fat. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty, if so advised. frv sdl_ \ SATISH K- AGN‘HOTRI Judge