^^c n^ /^ ..^ ?^r^ i ^r^ !K |^li^i^|^^ HON'I Hari Agrawal, S/o Shri P.C.Agravvai, aged about 55 years, R/o Tatiband Chowk, Raipur, Tahsil Vajila Raipur (C.G.) Reglstered Owner of Vehicle No.C.G. 04 G. 309S ]ii6a:e"t»|Ss*iSt 2. Sinah, W/o Lats Smt. Radhika Devi Singt Shri Parasu Ram Singh, aged about 35 years, (C.G.) Late Shri Parasu Ram Singh, aged about 09 years 3. Kanhaiya, S./o Shri Parasu Ram Slngh, aged about 08 years (Minor) 4. Ku. Renu Singh, D/o Late Shri Parasu Ram Singh, aged about 0( years (Minor) toth are minor respondent No.2 to 4 iegai guardian through mother Radhika Devi, W/o Late Shri Parasu Ram Slngh 5. Gorakh Singh, S/o Late Shri Phaujdar Singh, aged about 70 6. Smt. Moti Devi, VV./o Gorakh Singh, aged about 65 years All Respondents are resident of New Krishna Nagar, Near Jaisawal Kirana Stores, Supela, Police Station- Supeia, Bhilai, District - Durg (C.G.) 7. The New indian Insurance Company Limited Through the Divisional Manager Divislon Office No.2 Raipur, Near K^chahari Chovv'k, Raipur, Tahsii & District-Raipur Memoof^DDeal Under Section 30 of theWorkmen :t: Shri Prateek Sharma, isarned counsel for the appeitant. (12th August, 2088) "he foiiowing order of the Coyrt was passed by Shri Prateek Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant, in view of the Tact that the appellant/employer has not deposited ths amount of compensation awarded by the Commissioner for VA/orkmen Compensation, vide impugned award dated 25-03-2008, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal with the liberty of fiiine another appeal against the impugned award as and when the amount of compensation is deposited by the appellant/employer, as is mandated by Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act. 2. Permission aranted. 4. Sd/- -' Chief Justice the abov&liberty, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified CODV of the impuaned award be returned to iearned Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge subbu