IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29627 of 2010 PREM KUMAR SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU.C.B.I. ----------- 3 25.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned S.C. for the C.B.I. Defalcation is there of Rs. 77,12,287/- in name f allowing money to running staff for which they were not entitled. Some of the co- accused namely Devendra Kumar Singh, Manoj Kumar Shukla and Dilip Kumar are allowed bail. Same liberty is sought on the point of having no direct involvement in payment but I do not agree to this point as Office Superintendent cannot be exonerated from his liability if bills are passed for excess amount extending to lacs. Co- accused who have been allowed bail are Junior to this petitioner and they have been allowed bail in regular side only taking into consideration their custody also. Finding the petitioner not on their footing, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)