1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16836 OF 2010 IN REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO. 33248 OF 2010 IN LPA NO. 7 of 2002 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders grt/- Mr. P.G. Godhamgaonkar, Advocate for the applicants. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE & R.M. BORDE,JJ. DATE : 21st February, 2011 PER COURT : 1. By this civil application, the applicants have prayed for condonation of about 3 years delay in filing the review application seeking review of the order passed LPA No. 7 of 2002. 2. We have perused the order dated 9/7/2004, passed by the Division Bench dismissing the LPA as not maintainable. Admittedly, the writ petition was filed only under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Keeping that in view and considering the judgment of the Apex Court in the matter of "Shalini Sham Shetti Vs. Rajendra Shankar Patil" reported in 2010(7) Scale 428, in our view, the application for condonation of delay deserves to be rejected. 2 3. The civil application for condonation of delay is accordingly rejected and as a result thereof, the Review Application Stamp No. 33248 of 2010, also stands disposed of. [R.M. BORDE,J] [ D.B. BHOSALE, J.]