IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2011 / 3RD ASHADHA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 565 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------- G.GANGADHARAN NAIR, S/O.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, VARIKKOLIL, MYTHRI NAGAR 15, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- S.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR, (AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN), MANAGING DIRECTOR IN CHARGE, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695023. BY SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: CONT.CASE(C)No.565/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE I. CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT DATED 28.3.2011 IN W.P(C)NO.7371/2011 ANNEXURE II. TRUE COPY OF LAWYER NOTICE DATED 30.5.2011 SENT BY THE COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER. / TRUE COPY / P.S.TO JUDGE P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------------------- Cont. Case (C).No.565 of 2011 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th June, 2011 JUDGMENT This contempt case is filed alleging that the direction issued by this Court in Annexure I judgment delivered on 28.3.2011 in W.P(C)No.7371 of 2011 has not been complied with in so far as it relates to the petitioner herein. Sri.V.V.Nandagopal Nambiar, learned standing counsel appearing for the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation submitted on instructions obtained by him in writing from the Managing Director of the Corporation that the amount awarded by the Labour Court, Kollam has been quantified and payment has been sanctioned and that the petitioner can collect the money from the unit concerned. In such circumstances I am of the opinion that no further orders are called for except to observe that it will be open to the petitioner to collect the amount payable from the concerned unit. If he has any grievance regarding the amount paid in terms of the order passed by the Cont. Case (C).No.565 of 2011 -:2:- Labour Court, he can agitate that dispute in other appropriate proceedings. Without prejudice to that right this contempt case is closed. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge. ahg. P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- Cont Case(C).No.565 of 2011 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 24th June, 2011