IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 8272 of 2008. Decided on 7th December, 2010. Ghanshyam Tagore. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Y.W. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner is seeking compassionate appointment after the death of bread-earner on 12.01.1986. The purpose of offering the compassionate appointment is to enable the family to tide over the crises immediately after the death of the bread-earner. In this case, the bread-earner has died on 12.01.1986. Consequently, no directions can be issued at this stage to consider the case of the petitioner to offer him appointment on compassionate basis. Moreover, the brother of the petitioner has been serving in S.S.B. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 07, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - - 3 -