IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4182 of 2008 RAM BINAY PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 13-05-2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP on behalf of the State and also learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner is an accused in a case u/ss 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is father of Rajeev Paswan. The allegation is that petitioner along with his son Rajeev Paswan entered in the house of informant and they took away his daughter Veena Devi along with her son. At the time of alleged incident the age of Veena Devi was 25 years. Learned counsel submitted that petitioner is poor father of Rajeev Paswan who has performed marriage with Veena Devi. In this connection he referred to annexure-2 to the application. He submitted that petitioner’s wife has been allowed anticipatory bail by this court. He pointed out that petitioner is in custody since 18.12.06. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Sahebpur Kamal PS case no. 137/06. BKS/ (M. Saran,J.)