IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 8177 of 2010 a/w CWP Nos.8179, 8202, 8277 of 2010. Decided on: 29th December, 2010. 1. CWP No. 8177 of 2010 Bholi Devi. Versus State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP No. 8179 of 2010 Shyam Lal and ors. Versus State of H.P. & anr. 3. CWP No. 8202 of 2010 Kali Ram Versus State of H.P. & ors. 4. CWP No. 8179 of 2010 Jeet Ram Versus State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners : M/s. D.K. Khanna, Archana Dutt, Rajender Sharma, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim work charge status/regularistion with all consequential benefits from the date they completed 10 years of continued service. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P. and others, 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 313. 2. The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioners may file individual representation 2 furnishing all factual details before the second respondent within a period of one month from today. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in the light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioners will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment, referred to above, while submitting the representation. 3. The writ petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 29th December, 2010 (Justice V.K. Sharma), (VT/pankaj) Judge.