IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2011 / 10TH ASHADHA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 619 of 2011(S) ---------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT/ORDER IN WPC.18535/2010 DATED 02/02/2011 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER -------------------------------------- M.J. DAISY, PRINCIPAL, AGED 50 YEARS, W/O.IMMANUAL, ST.SEBASTIANS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, GOTHURUTHY. BY ADV. SRI.B.RAMACHANDRAN, SMT.K.B.REKHA. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. JAMES VARGHESE, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. MUHAMED HANEEF, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DIRECTOR-IN-CHARGE, DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY DIRECTORATE, HOUSING BOARD COMPLEX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. VALSAMMA VARKEY, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY DIRECTORATE, EDAPALLY-682 024. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.V. VIJULAL. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/07/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs Con.Case(C).No. 619 of 2011(S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. 18535/2010. ANNEXURE A2: COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 07/02/2011 SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE A3: COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT FROM THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 16/02/2011. RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Contempt of Court Case No.619/2011-S ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 1st day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Heard. The learned Government pleader produced before me for perusal G.O.(Rt).No.2389/2011/G.Edn., dated 24/06/2011 which shows that the Government has passed orders, in terms of the directions issued by this Court in the Judgment, to regularise the period of suspension of the petitioner from 27/08/2008 to 19/04/2009 as duty for all purposes limiting the pay and allowances for the period to subsistence allowance already drawn and the intervening period from 20/04/2009 to 21/04/2009 as joining time and/or leave due and admissible to the officer as per note 2 below Rule 56B(9), Part I, Kerala Service Rules. If the petitioner has got any further grievance in the matter, it is open to her to resort to appropriate remedies. The Contempt of Court Case is therefore, closed. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms