IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 252 OF 2006 SHRI MARIO PEREIRA ....Petitioner Versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND 2 ....Respondents ORS Shri P.A. Kholkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.R. Rivonkar, Ga For State/Respondent Mr. G.K.Sardessai, Advocate for R.3. Coram:- V.C.DAGA & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 1st August, 2006 P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Having considered the contingencies raised and having taken into account the laches in filing the petition, we are not inclined to entertain this petition. The explanation furnished can hardly be said to be an explanation, explaining the delay. The petition is therefore dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. V.C.DAGA, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. sl.