1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3683 OF 2010 Mahatma Jyotiba Fule and Sardar Wallabhbhai Patel, Vidya Prasarak Mandal ..Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra and another. ..Respondents ......... Mr.S.T. Kazi, Advocate for petitioner. Mr.S.V. Kurundkar, Addl.G.P. for respondent no.1. ........ (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) DATE : 14th July, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. The petition is filed against the order dated 9th March, 2010 rendered by learned Assistant Charity Commissioner whereby application for amendment came to be allowed. The original application filed by the respondent no.2 did not show names of outgoing trustees. He filed application for introduction of names of outgoing trustees. The Assistant Charity Commissioner has observed that the amendment was necessary for adjudication 2 of controversy on merits. The Assistant Charity Commissioner further observed that though there was delay of 5 years yet since objection was not taken seriously because the written objection was filed only on 02.02.2010 and as such, the formal amendment could be allowed. The enquiry was yet to be commenced, and therefore, the amendment of formal nature was allowed to meet the ends of justice. No perversity is noticed. Petition disposed of with direction to change report filed by the petitioner and the change report filed by the respondent no.2 may be simultaneously considered. (V.R.KINGAONKAR) JUDGE gas/wp3683.10