Crl.A. 178/2004 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA On the appeal being taken up for hearing, a prayer has been made by Mr S. Das Gu pta, learned counsel appearing for the appellant to treat this appeal as a crimi nal revision petition. Mr K. Munir, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam , is also of the same view that though the appeal was admitted by this Court vid e order dated 22.06.2004, the same ought to have been registered as criminal rev ision petition. In the instant appeal, the appellant has challenged the legality and validity o f the judgment and order dated 26.02.2004 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Nagaon in CA No. 85(N)/2003 upholding the judgment and order dated 31.07.2003 pa ssed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hojai, Shankardev Nagar in case No. GR 1051/1999 convicting the appellant under section 380 IPC and sent enced him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for two (2) years and a fine of Rs. 1 ,000/- in default, RI for three (3) months more. I have gone through the judgments passed by the learned Courts below and of the opinion that there is nothing in Criminal Procedure Code to bar an appeal, being treated as a criminal revision petition or vice-versa. The purpose of framing o r promulgating all rules of Procedure obviously is to enable the Courts to do ju stice. As such, every Procedure which advances dispensation of justice should be considered permissible unless it is prohibited. In view of the above, this criminal appeal is directed to be treated as a crimin al revision petition. Let this criminal appeal be accordingly registered as criminal revision petition and the same be listed for further order on 16.12.2011.