IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC NO.3459 OF 2010 RENU SINHA @ RENU KUMARI SINHA, WIFE OF SHRI MAHESH PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALHEE, POLICE STATION SAHARSA, DISTRICT SAHARSA VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH MR. BAIDYA NATH PRASAD, INVESTIGATING –CUM- POLICE INSPECTOR, VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT, PATNA 2. MR. KISHORI RAM, SPECIAL JUDGE, VIGILANCE 1ST (TRAP), PATNA WITH CRIMINAL MISC. NO. 10837 OF 2010 RENU SINHA @ RENU KUMARI SINHA, WIFE OF SHRI MAHESH PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALHEE, POLICE STATION SAHARSA, DISTRICT SAHARSA VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE VIGILANCE ********** 5 30/03/2011 This quashing application as well as the contempt application relate to an order of this Court dated 02.02.2010. The main grievance of the petitioner in this case was that she was not supplied police papers and certain exhibits on which the prosecution intended to rely. After the order of this Court, the Vigilance Department has supplied the documents, the case diary has already been supplied and, therefore, the contention of the petitioner that statement under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has not been handed over to her is incorrect. The charges in this case were framed on 12,11,2009. Obviously, the charges were framed without supply of documents, which is not permissible in law. 2 Therefore, the Court below would be required to re-frame the charges within the shortest possible time. No further time should be granted to the petitioner on any frivolous grounds. The petitioner should also co-operate with the Court below in the trial. These two applications are thus disposed of with the aforesaid directions. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )