WOW^ c< ' ^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CjIHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) NO-5?^7~OF 2009 (S.B.) PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^...^ ew> ./^r>^ .^y' •^y,--"" v^y ^ Rohitram Jangde, aged about 72 years S/o Manrakhan @ Kalbali, Retired Headmaster, R/o Village Kurra (Navapara), Tahsil Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS ^ 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Departraent of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Accountant General, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.). ^3. The District Education Officer, Raipur (C.G.). 4. The Block Education Officer, Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION .-^ rn<--N. ^' :"_"W?A. '^^i_ ../'_. ..... ... ^...-..^._V-'i'l^-^-.—^-—.-.„—— OFINDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5947 of2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Rohitram Jangde. VERSUS The State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Slui Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: Shri P.K.Tulsyan, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri A.V.Sliridhar, Panel Lawyei' forthe State/respondeiit No. 1, 3 and 4. Shri KashifShakeel, Advocate tbrthe respondentNo. 2. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 20m day ofOctober, 2009) With the consent ofleamed counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is heard fmally. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case, being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to tlie pension committee. 2. Tliis Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) aiid other comiected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed questiosi of facts were uivolved. The Coimnittee was constituted by the State Govemment, pursuant to the order dated • 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Govemmentand others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State ofChhattisgarh & Others v. Baijnath Mandal and-another'). Thus, tliis petition is squarely eovered by the judgment and order dated 31 of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. ! 4642/2004 Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by leamed couiisel appearing for the parties. 3. With the consent oftiie partfes, this pctition is accordingly disposed of in the sanie terms i.e. the ofFice ofthe Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Coiimiittee; within a period of 15 days from the date ofreceipt of a copy ofthe petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Conimittee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concemed, within a furtlier period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order- m accordance with law, afier affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concemed may file additional documeirts, if necessaiy. The entire exercise, mcluding payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed witliin a period offour months from the date of receipt ofa copy ofthis order. 4. The petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petition to the leamed counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the Same to the Conmiittee. sd/- SatisfaK.Agnihotri Judge Amit