IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.385 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO.385 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO.385 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2612 OF 2007 PETITION NO.2612 OF 2007 PETITION NO.2612 OF 2007 Mr. Sanjay Rampati Shukla ..Petitioner V/s. Union of India & Anr. ..Respondents ....... Mr. S.K. Dubey for the Petitioner Ms. S.V. Bharucha for Respondent No.1 Mr. Balasaheb Deshmukh for Respondent No.2 ....... CORAM CORAM CORAM : SHRI J.N.PATEL & : SHRI J.N.PATEL & : SHRI J.N.PATEL & SHRI SHRI SHRI K.K.TATED, JJ. K.K.TATED, JJ. K.K.TATED, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 : 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 : 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2008 P.C.: . The Notice of Motion is taken out for restoration of the Writ Petition which came to be dismissed in default on 4th August, 2008. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, we are inclined to allow the Notice of Motion. 2. The learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 states that he was informed by the learned counsel : 2 : appearing for the Petitioner that he would attend this Court immediately after he finishes his work as he was busy with the matter in another Court. In the meantime, the Respondent No.2 may file his affidavit in reply opposing the Petition, if any, within two weeks. 3. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). No order as to costs. 4. The Petition be listed for admission in due course. (J.N. (J.N. (J.N. Patel, J.) Patel, J.) Patel, J.) (K.K. (K.K. (K.K. Tated, J.) Tated, J.) Tated, J.)