cp126.10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 126 OF 2010 Suvarna Laxmanrao Shirsat .. PETITIONER VERSUS Uddhav Manikrao Karad & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. Vivek Bhavthankar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.D. Kaldate, AGP for respondent no. 4. Mr. R.R. Suryawansh, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 127 OF 2010 Savita Vishwambhar Jadhav .. PETITIONER VERSUS Uddhav Manikrao Karad & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. Vivek Bhavthankar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.D. Kaldate, AGP for respondent no. 4. Mr. R.R. Suryawanshi, advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. ===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 15 th MARCH, 2011. PER COURT : 1 The Division Bench of this court while dealing with Writ Petition no. 4574/2009 has observed in its judgment in paragraph no. 9 as below : cp126.10 2 9 The Divisional Social Welfare Officer and District Social Welfare Officer now shall take appropriate steps in tune with the order passed by the Divisional Social Welfare Officer in case of the petitioners. The issue regarding payment of salary shall also be dealt with accordingly. These observations made by us shall not affect the proceedings filed by the respondent / institution before the learned Single Judge of this court. We expect that the higher officers now take prompt action within two weeks from today. . It is stated by learned counsel appearing for the management that the contempt petitioners were permitted to join service on 23-1-2010. The management has also tendered cheque of amount of salary payable to the contempt petitioners for a period between 20-11-2009 ( date of decision in Writ Petition no. 4574/2009 ) till the date of joining of the petitioners. Thus, there is substantial compliance as regards payment of arrears of salary to the petitioners. Contempt petitions therefore need to be disposed of and the same are accordingly disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE dyb