THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8364 of 2011 ORDER: The respondent issued a notice under Section 405 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act (for short ‘the Act’) requiring the petitioners to remove the structure named therein. This writ petition is filed challenging the same. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. It is not in dispute that the structure in question was constructed on the land owned by the Municipal Corporation. The necessity to issue a notice under Section 406 of the Act would arise if only the Corporation acknowledged the title of the owner of the building, but wants the structure to be removed for the purpose of providing any public amenity. As long as the petitioners do not dispute the title of the Corporation vis-à-vis the land on which the structure is made, no exception can be taken to the impugned notice. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioners are granted one week time from today to remove the structure/projection mentioned in the impugned notice. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:01.04.2011. kdl