1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil application No. 1983/2008 in Writ Petition No. 5073/2007 Dnyandip Bahu Uddeshiya Shaishanik Va Samajik Sanstha Dawasa & Ors. ..vs.. Devanand Punjaramji Nikam and another -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Dharmadhikari, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. Shende, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr. Sonak, A.G.P. for respondent no. 2. Mr. Mohogaonkar, Advocate for intervener. CORAM: J. H. BHATIA, J. DATED : 15 th JANUARY, 2009 1. The applicant claims to be President of the petitioner-Society, while this fact is denied by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes statement that already Change Report has been submitted to the effect that new Management has taken charge after election. 2. On hearing learned counsel for the applicant, it appears that it is purely a dispute between different persons in the Management and his grievance is about mismanagement of the society. That grievance has nothing to do with the dispute in the present petition, which is 2 between the Management and the employee. It appears that as per the change report since 2002, the applicant is not the Chairman or the President of the society. If he is having any grievance about the mismanagement he can approach the Charity Commissioner. Hence, the present application for intervention is rejected. 3. In case, the Charity Commissioner in the proceedings comes to the conclusion that the present applicant is still the President, the applicant shall be at liberty to move again for intention. JUDGE kahale