C') / C^<^1^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) N0. S)^S /2006 PETITIONER ^A^ ,q^^> ^•^^ -^ ^ l'':;i- » ^p".€;;?* ..•••' sSy' ••'' ^"' ..•"' &«^••' B.R.Kurre^ aged about 65 years, S/0.'"^^ '-^ &.P -»1<-"<T^- '- Retired Block Development Officer Basana, Mahasamund fC.G ) R/o Ghivra, P.0. Devargt-iata Distt. Jangir-Champa (C G ) VERSUS RESPONDENTS .^f^ l')i L6 ^^y^ :1. Accountant General State of Chhattisgarh New Bus Stand Pandhari. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief executive Officer < Janpad Panchayar Basana Distt. Mahasamund (C.G ) VVRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. 5158 of 2006 Petitioner B. -R. Kurre Versus Respondents Accountaat General &, aaother Sin^e Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satlsh K. Agnihotri. Shri D, R. Sharma, Advocate with Miss Auita Singh, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Sint. B. Maittti, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. None for the icspondent No.2. ORDER (21st September, 2006) 1. Leamed counsel appeaiing for tfae petitioner submits fhat as aU the retiral dlies of fhe petitioner have not been paid by the respondents, fherefore the petitioner has niadc a representation dated 21.7.2006 (Anuexure P/4) to the respondeat No. l. At fhis stage, leamed couiisel for the petitioner siibniits that this petition niav be disposed of with& f- dipection to decide tbe penduig representation of the petitioner withia stipulated period, to which leamed counsel for fhe respondent No. 1. has no objection. 2, Accordingly, the icspondent No.l is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 21.7.2006 (Aiuiexure P/4) of the petitioner, in accordance with law, on its own nierit, witliin a period of six weeks froin fhe date ofreceipt/production ofacopy offhis order. 3. With tbe above observation this petition stands disposed of. No onder as to costs. _ . __ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Thakur Jytjge