IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 183 OF 2011 SHRI. DIOGO SILVEIRA AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus SMT. CONCEICAO SILVEIRA ... Respondent Ms. Sagita Mandrekar,advocate for the petitioners. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 25th March, 2011 P.C: Heard Ms. Mandrekar, learned counsel for the petitioners. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge order dated 15/1/2011 by which the trial Court has refused to permit the defendants to re-examine D-W.1 Carmelina. Having heard the learned counsel for the applicant and having perused the record, I am of the considered opinion, that no case has been made out for interference with the impugned order in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution. It cannot be said that the trial Court has exercised jurisdiction illegally. Hence, the petition is dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-