IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP (T) No.11555 of 2008 Decided on: June 2, 2011 Babali Kumar ..Petitioner. Versus HPSEB & others .. Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. Surjit Singh, Judge (oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. Petitioner, who had been appointed as Part Time Water Carrier on compassionate ground, is aggrieved by the order of cancellation of his appointment, ordered vide order, copy Annexure A-8. 3. Scheme of appointment of Part Time Water Carrier provides for appointment on compassionate grounds, without following selection process, in case the candidate is handicapped and also belongs to IRDP family. 4. Petitioner got appointment, on the ground that he was handicapped, on account of mental retardation to Whet her report ers of t he l ocal papers may be al l owed t o see t he j udgment ? É2É the extent of 60% and also he belonged to IRDP family. He was appointed on the assumption that he belonged to IRDP family. Later on, it was revealed that his father was a government servant and as such, he could not be said to belong to IRDP family and, therefore, his appointment was cancelled. Since petitioner’s father was in government service, his family could not be said to belong to IRDP. There is nothing wrong with the order of respondents, in cancelling the appointment of the petitioner. Hence, the petition is dismissed. June 2, 2011(ss) (Surjit Singh), J.