- 1 - 4.ss.1938.11 skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.1938 OF 2011 Kantilal Otarmal Jain ..Plaintiff -Versus- Devayani R. Parekh & Anr. ..Defendants .......... Ms. Nisha Parmar i/b Tushar Goradia & Nisha Parmar for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. .......... CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 14TH DECEMBER 2011. P.C. 1 The suit is based on a bill of exchange drawn by defendant no.1 in favour of the plaintiff and accepted by defendant no.2. The defendants having failed and neglected to make the payment in respect thereof, the plaintiff addressed a notice of demand. There is no reply to the same. The defendants have not filed an appearance. The defendants are absent. 2 There is nothing on record that militates against the plaintiff’s claim. I see no reason to disbelieve the averments and submissions in the plaint. There is, therefore, no defence to the suit. - 2 - 4.ss.1938.11 3 In the circumstances, the suit is decreed as prayed. However, interest after the date of the suit shall be at 12% per annum. Costs to be quantified as per Rules. Refund, if any, as per Rules. -