WPMS No.1057 of 2004 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. N. K. Papnoi, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sudhir Kumar, the learned brief holder for the respondent nos.1 to 4, and Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.5 & 6. . The trial court, by an order dated 21.11.1997, granted an injunction directing the post of Lecturer to be kept vacant till the disposal of the suit. Against this injunction order, the defendant filed an appeal, which was rejected, consequently, the writ petition. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, this court is of the opinion that the post in question cannot be left vacant. The defendant contends that his name has been recommended for promotion by the Committee of Management. In the light of the aforesaid, the court is of the opinion that such injunction order should not be granted. The writ petition is accordingly allowed. The impugned order passed by the trial court as well as by the appellate authority is quashed. The trial court is directed to proceed with the matter expeditiously and decide the suit within one year from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial court within ten days from today. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 22.12.2011 LSR