1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 3793 OF 2008 Rohidas S/o Vitthal Naik and others Versus The State of Maharashtra and another. *** Mr. S. V. Suryawanshi, Advocate i/b Mr.P. B. Shirsath, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. B. R. Khekale, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** 1. Heard learned counsel extensively. The proceeding in M.A.No.237 of 2008 initiated by the victim Smt. Radhabai Rohidas Naik for an offence under section 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code are subject to challenge. It was argued by the counsel that since the accused Rohidas was already a married person, consequently, the infraction of provisions of section 498-A will not be available to be coined by the wife, Rohidas could not keep relations with the complainant Radhabai. He says the entire allegations are false. 2. The material which was placed before the learned Judge, based on the statement of the complainant, made the learned Judge to direct inquiry to investigate in the matter in the light of section 156 (3) of Criminal Procedure Code. The order of the 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. learned Judge cannot be said to be erroneous, requiring any interference. The application is dismissed. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:31/07/2009. ans/3793