IN THE HIGH COUR T OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.209 of 2009 Manoj Kumar Singh Versus Krishna Deo Singh & Ors ----------- 6 29.09.2011 Heard the parties. This revision application has been filed against the order dated 20.11.2008 whereby the petition filed by the plaintiff under Order 12 Rule 6 for passing a decree on the basis of admission has been rejected. The suit has been filed by the plaintiff for declaration of his title over the schedule-1 property and further for declaration that the gift deed dated 26.10.1999 is illegal and be cancelled. The plaintiff thereafter filed a petition that the averments made in the written statement show that the defendants have admitted that the gift deed dated 26.10.1999 is not valid and in view of the admission the suit be decreed under order 12 Rule 6 C.P.C. After hearing the plaintiff and defendants and considering the written statement filed by the defendants the court below has come to the conclusion that there is no specific admission by the defendants in their written statement accepting the validity of the deed of gift. In the impugned order the court below has mentioned some portions 2 of the averments of the written statement from which also it does not appear that the requisite admission in accordance with order 12 rule 6 has been made by the defendant. The court below has rightly held that there is no specific admission which is the primary requirement under order 12 rule 6. C.P.C. There is no legal infirmity in the impugned order. This revision application is accordingly dismissed. M.Rahman/ (V.Nath,J.)