(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 275 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 275 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 275 OF 2004 Satish Janardan Chavan ...Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Mr. Uday Warunjikar, counsel for Petitioner Mr. A.H. Palekar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr. P.M. Pradhan, counsel for Respondent No.2. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 17TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 17TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 17TH FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- . In view of the provisions of Section 17 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, this contempt petition need not be entertained and therefore, the same is disposed of with the petitioner being relegated to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal at Mumbai.