IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6800 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision : 28.10.2009 Harbhajan Singh .....Petitioner versus Hindu Panchayati Dharmshala Mandir and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner, Mr. for the respondents. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 15.10.2008 whereby the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, moved by the petitioner-tenant to set-aside the ex-parte eviction order dated 14.6.2001passed by the Rent Controller, Rajpura, has been dismissed. On an objection raised on behalf of the respondent-landlord, counsel for the petitioner-tenant states that since there is already an eviction order and the application for recalling the same has also been dismissed, the impugned order is appealable under Order 43 Rule 1 CPC C.R. No.6800 of 2008 (O&M) 2 read with Section 15 (1) (b) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restrictions Act, 1949. He accordingly seeks permission to withdraw this revision petition with liberty to approach the Appellate Authority within two weeks from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Keeping in view the fact that this Court has already granted ad-interim stay against the eviction of the petitioner, it is directed that the said ad-interim order shall remain operative till the Appellate Authority, Patiala passes an appropriate order on the stay application. However, the petitioner-tenant is directed to deposit the entire arrears of rent uptill 30th November, 2009 before the Appellate Authority which shall be accepted by the respondent-landlord without prejudice to its legal rights. The Appellate Authority, Patiala, shall make an endeavour to decide the appeal as early as possible but preferably within 6 months. In case the petitioner files the appeal within 2 weeks from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order, the counsel for the respondent- landlord fairly agrees not to raise the objection of limitation. Disposed of. Dasti. 28-10-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE