IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 2a^, Writ Petition No._ _/2003 •^ PEmiONER ^•2?^9^:;y^i M/s H. R Malikand Coxryary, ThroughMr. AK.Malik, A^/sdalxnrt 62 yeare/ S/oLateH.RMfllik, R/o H.LG. - II, Padmnabhanpitr, Dtu^(CG) - Versu&- RESKONDENTS : 1. /' .....^ ' Unionoflndia^ ThroughSecretary, Is/fimstry of Law, Siastri Bhawaii, R P. Road, New Ddlu. / ^'\<^^' ^T' <^A/ '»<•*' 2. CerrtiialBaiikofIndift, Throughits General Manager, Qvte Center, Bhilai, Dlstdct- Dlag (CGL). / ^ 3^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDJA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT. ORDER OR DIRECTION. B*- ^. XI-HC-22 ^FI^T'^T l%vi ?n^r ^m»i<t!ia w<s^^^\~- ,. !> ^ I- "^^ ^TR^T^ ^<ni^y 3?llf?T ''^^? +<W<»18 ^^^.....»*..»..,........--.—....^p^ 'te?y" ^rr^T wiTW Nt^ DtVISlONBENCH: HON»BLESHRIXS^ENKATACH ^HO BLESHRIFAKMRUDD16L HON»BLESHRIXS^ENKATACMlM-A MOORTHY, CJ .y...'.. .'..'• 29W6^6N:- ;;'C::'^.^^1^:.1,'.;';'.^- Sliri^shant^atswaleouns^forthep^ Shri Vinay Harit. Sr. Stendirte Counsel for the Union of IncUa, for responctent No.1. Sbn S.C.SwamkaT, leamed c|ounsel for respondent hto.2. Following the decision of th4 MardiaGhemical Ltd. Vs. Unionof l<idia(20(WA^ petittohsbandsdismissed. 13l(4) Assels Howevei^ it is made ctear taRen action under Section Reconstryction <rf Financial InterestAct, 2002 in such cases it appeals ynder Sectjon 17 of prescribedtherefor, to ^e counted wjth effect from today, Sd/- Chief Justice chl4f^41rl Hl^^T ^ f^L<i) ^P?1^1< ^T 3Tf;<W 3TI^T Supreme Court in the matter of dia (2004 AlRSCW2S41),thewrtt ttkat whore a secured crBditor has of the Securitisation and and EnforGement of Securjty ^ould be opeh to borrcwers to fiie Act wtthin the Iwnitaffon as trte Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^^fe^ "'K