CW 5759/08 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5759/08 Smt. Madan Kanwar Versus Secretary & Anr. DATE OF ORDER : 06/08/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Amit Singh Shekhawat, for petitioner *** Instant petition has been filed on the premise that family pension has been wrongly denied to her vide order Ann.5 dt.22nd January, 2008. Petitioner's husband who was serving as Peon and posted in the office of Assistant Engineer [O&M] RSEB, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, as alleged, was appointed in 1975 and was removed from service vide order Ann.3 dt.10th December, 1981. Benefits which are admissible were paid and later on her husband died on 7th July, 2003. Thereafter, she moved application for release of family pension which was denied vide order Ann.5. Counsel for petitioner submits that since her husband has completed minimum qualifying service in terms of conditions for grant of pension referred to in Schedule 'A' and being widow she is entitled for family pension. CW 5759/08 [2] From order impugned Ann.5, it clearly shows that petitioner's husband was not on roll and removed way back in August, 1981. Even by that time he hardly rendered six years service, whereas under Schedule 'A' 10 yrs. is the minimum qualifying service which makes an incumbent entitled for pension. In absence whereof, petitioner cannot be held to be entitled for grant of family pension. This court does not find any substance in the writ petition, the same stands dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA5759CW2008 6-8.doc