w Sl&iC'" f- RC'"?'" /? d^o"- /er^-7 ^-^ //!// K^SlNo^Y{Y3 v--'" \^.--1'\&.-: •Ji-\'</J;>^"' '.''-:Q'..V^Z4.-- ^s^ •:y^' ,<» .•••* Age about 41 years, garh '•> Scheduled Tribe 3. Tl a. Dimrapal, Tah. & District-Jagdalpur (C.G) \\ I'a'- HiGHCOyRTQFCHHATTISQARH: BSLASPUR ^ PETITiONER WR!T PETITSON (S) N0. 5U3 OF 2009 Smt. Mausmi Bhute RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhatttegarh & Othsrs (Writ petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri S.P. Kaie, counsei for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Pane! LawyerfortheState. Gowri (Passed o" this 10tn day of September, 2009) 1. Heard leamed counsel for the oarties. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant petition is squareiy covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Smt. A. Lal! v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others , thus the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to decide her case in the light of afore-stated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No-3 institute is a Government aided school and the oetltioner is a teacher within the sanctioned strength. 3. Learned counsel apDearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same wiii be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receiot of the reDresentatlon. 4. in view of foregoing, according to the learned counsei appesring for the oetitioner, nothina survives in this Detition for adiudication. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. 1 WP No.4108 of 2005 (decided on 6-2-2007) Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge