(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. Criminal Revision Application No. of 2011 (Stamp No. 291/2009) Hari s/o. Narayan Mudkhede, Age : 60 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Marwali, Taluka : Naigaon (Kh.), District : Nanded. .. Applicant. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Naigaon, Taluka : Naigaon, District : Nanded. 2. Ramkishan s/o. Digamber Mudkhede, Age : 30 years, Occupation : Agriculture. 3. Maroti s/o. Digamber Mudkhede, Age : 25 years, Occupation : Agriculture. 4. Datta s/o. Digamber Mudkhede, Age : 22 years, Occupation : Agriculture. 5. Vimalbai w/o. Digamber Mudkhede, Age : 60 years, Occupation : Household. .. Respondents (Nos.2 to 5 - All R/o. Marwali, Taluka : Naigaon (Kh.), Original accused) District : Nanded. (2) ....................... Mr. J.M. Murkute, Advocate, holding for Mr. S.N. Lavekar, Advocate, for the applicant. Smt. Y.M. Kshirsagar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent no.1. Mr. U.B. Bilolikar, Advocate, for respondent nos.2 to 5. ........................ CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATE : 1ST AUGUST 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. Office to register it as Criminal Revision Application. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 3. The revision applicant (original complainant) has preferred this revision application against the order of acquittal recorded by the learned Judicial Magistrate (F.C.), Naigaon (Bazar) (District : Nanded), in Regular Criminal Case No. 164 of 2000, dated 10-7-2009, thereby acquitting respondent nos.2 to 5 herein i.e. original accused, for the offences punishable under (3) Sections 324, 504 and 506, read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code. 4. Adv. Mr. J.M. Murkute, holding for Adv. Mr. S.N. Lavekar, for the applicant (original complainant), on instructions of the applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present Criminal Revision Application, with liberty to file appeal before the learned Sessions Court, under proviso of Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, since the applicant herein is the first informant. 5. In view of the said submission, leave granted and applicant is permitted to withdraw present Criminal Revision Application and same stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. However, it is made clear that the aspect of limitation shall play its own role and if the applicant prefers any application for condonation of delay before the learned Sessions Court, it shall be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. ( SHRIHARI P. DAVARE ) JUDGE bgp/krast291