IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 17TH BHADRA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 5440 of 2010() ----------------------------------------- CMP.NO.6426/2010 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE, THALIPPARAMBU. ...................... (CRIME NO.577/2010 OF THALIPPARAMBU POLICE STATION, KANNUR) PETITIONER(S): 5TH ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------------- P.LATHEEF, S/O.SOOPPY, AGED 34 YEARS, PANIKKARAKATH HOUSE, KAPPALAM, THALIPPARAMBA PO, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.MUJEEB RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------- STATE THROUGH S.H.O. TALIPARAMBU POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M,.S. BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/09/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No. 5440 of 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated:8th day of September, 2010 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 5th accused in Crime No.577/2010 of Thalipparambu Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 395 IPC, seeks his enlargement on bail. Th occurrence took place on 3.8.2010. The petitioner was arrested on 11.8.2010. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) dmb