IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH APRIL 2009 / 25TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 11144 of 2009(K) PETITIONER(S): VODAFONE ESSAR CELLULAR LIMITED FORMERLY KNOWN AS HUTCHISON ESSAR CELLULAR LTD., XL-5115, ASHIS BUILDING, SHANMUGAM ROAD, COCHIN-682 031, REP.BY ITS MANAGER-LEGAL, RAJESH MELETH VEETIL. BY ADV. SRI.P.SATHISAN RESPONDENT(S): 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOZHIKODE. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KUNNAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE. 5. SECRETARY, KUNNAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KUNNAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 6. RAMAKRISHNAN, S/O.VELAYUDAN, VELLARAMKUNNEL HOUSE, WARD NO.17, KUNNAMANGALAM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 7. SURESH BABU, MELEPARAMBIL HOUSE, WARD NO.17, KUNNAMANGALAM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.T. MUHAMMED THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: W.P.C.NO. 11144/2009. -------------------------------------------------------------------- EXT.P1 COPY OF RELEVANT EXTRACT OF LICENCE. EXT.P2 BUILDING PERMIT DT. 3-2-2007. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF CERTIFICATE. EXT.P4 COMPLAINT DT. 26-3-2009. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT. EXT.P6 INTERIM ORDER IN W.P.C.NO. 4444/2009 DT. 11-2-2009. [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE. S. Siri Jagan & Antony Dominic, JJ. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 11144 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 15th April, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a cell phone service provider. They have constructed a telecommunication tower for the purpose of providing such service. They have filed this writ petition seeking police protection against respondents 6 and 7 who are allegedly obstructing the petitioner from commissioning the telecommunication tower. 2. On 3-4-2009, this Court passed the following interim order: “If the commissioning of the tower is already over catering the needs of the public and if there is any obstruction to ingress and egress, the police will remove such obstruction so as to allow the willing workers and staff to enter the business premises.” 3. Although, notice has been served on the respondents, none appears to contest the writ petition on behalf of respondents 6 and 7. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the interim order. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Sd/- Antony Dominic, Judge. Tds/