Kll%"CC1 HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR SINSLE BB<ICH : HON'BLE SHKt JA6&ISH BHAU.A, Ag, C.J. Writ PetitKmNo,105 of 2004 PETTTIONBt: Brij Mohan t>ua son of Shri Sitaram OQed about 50 years R/o ©ondpara Bilaspur, Tdi. & Ustt. Bilasptn- (C.S.) yersus RESPON6BMTS: 1. ftcu'ar<m sonofshyamlatoged 60yecrs. 2. Radheshyaniagedobout 61 years 3. Sanedi Ramogedabout45yeors M[ sors of Shri Shycimlal R/o vitlcge Ameri Tahsil Takhfftyur Distt. Bifospui* Writ Petition ynder Ar'ticle 227 o'f the Constitution of India Preserit: Shri Rom Kuma' Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner. None appears forthe respondents. ORSALORC>B» (Possiid w»03ni^uly, 2007) Learned counsel for thepetitioner stated that the petition has become infructuous. Accor'dingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. A Sd/- ^.ChiefJustice