:1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.504 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Nitin Sejpal and Ms. Pooja Bhojane for the applicant. Mr.S.R.Shinde, APP. for the State. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J. DATED : 15/2/2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard both sides. 2. Rule. By consent, rule made returnable forthwith. 3. In this application the order which is challenged is an order rejecting an application for recall of Investigating Officer for further cross examination. The record indicates that examination in chief of the Investigating Officer was closed on 1.2.2006. It appears :2: that the advocate for the accused was absent and in the circumstances, the accused was asked to cross examine the witness. He could only asked two questions. Subsequently on the same day the advocate for the accused made a request for allowing her to cross examine the witness. This prayer is rejected on the same day and the matter was adjourned for 313 Statement. In my view, in the interest of justice, it is desirable that the Investigating Officer should be allowed to be cross examined by the advocate for the accused otherwise a lacuna in the trial will remain. In the circumstances, the order rejecting the prayer for recall of the Investigating Officer is set aside. I am informed that the matter is placed tomorrow. A.P.P. after taking instructions from API. Mr. Shewale present in court states that Mr. Shewale will convey the message to the concerned Investigating Officer to remain present in the court. If the Investigating Officer remains present :3: in the court, the matter to further proceed and thereafter 313 Statement be recorded. In the circumstances, rule is made absolute and the application is disposed off. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)