IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 6279 OF 2009 Between: K.V.Krishna Murthy ..... PETITIONER AND C.Raghavendrachari .... RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 6279 OF 2009 O R D E R: This revision petition is directed against the order dated 07.12.2009 in E.P.No.74 of 2008 in O.S.No.386 of 2005 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Hindupur directing arrest of the revision petitioner for realisation of the decretal amount in O.S.No.386 of 2005. This Court, while directing notice to the respondents, by order dated 29.12.2009, granted interim stay of arrest of the revision petitioner subject to the condition of depositing half of the E.P. claim within a period of four weeks. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the conditional order has been complied with and the same has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record. Admittedly, the decree in O.S.No.386 of 2005 has become final. On a proper appreciation of the evidence adduced by the parties, the Court below recorded a finding that the revision petitioner/judgment debtor had sufficient means to pay the decretal amount. I do not find any justifiable reason to interfere with the said finding of fact and therefore, the matter warrants no interference by this Court. However, having regard to the fact that the petitioner has already deposited half of the E.P. claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the Civil Revision Petition with a direction to the revision petitioner to pay the balance of the E.P. claim within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. It is made clear that in case, the revision petitioner fails to deposit the said amount within the time fixed above, the order under revision shall be implemented. So far as the amount already deposited by the judgment debtor/revision petitioner in compliance with the interim order granted by this Court, the respondent/decree holder is hereby granted liberty to withdraw the same without furnishing any security. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. ____________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 27.04.2010 Note: Issue CC in four days (B/o) Ivd