IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 377 of 2008. Mamta Pandey D/O Late Mathura Dutt Pandey. … Petitioner. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and two others. …Respondents. Mr. Priyank Kwatra, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Prabha Noliyal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. N.P.Sah, Standing Counsel, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1. Mrs. Seema Sirohi, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2-Uttarakhand Examination Board. Mr. M.C.Pandey, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. Date October 06, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Mr. Priyank Kwatra, Advocate, holding brief of Ms. Prabha Noliyal, Advocate, for the petitioner has stated at Bar that the writ petition is rendered infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP