IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4201 of 2009 Ram Bali Mahto, Son of Shiv Gulam Mahto, R/o Village Dhattha, P.S. Rosera, District Samastipur. --------- Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar -------- Opposite Party With Cr.Misc. No.3342 of 2009 Bijali Mahto @ Navin Kumar Mahto, S/o Ram Chandra Mahto, Resident of Village Dharha, P.O. Dharha, P.S. Rosadha, District Samastipur. ----- Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ------ Opposite Party With Cr.Misc. No.7420 of 2009 Ram Badan Mahto, S/o Late Bilat Mahto, Resident of Village Haripur, P.S. Rosera, District Samastipur. -------- petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ------- Opposite Party With Cr.Misc. No.7589 of 2009 Babloo Mahto @ Anjani Kumar Swatantra, Son of Ram Narain, Resident of Village Dhhatha, P.S. Rosera, District samastipur. --------- Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ------ Opposite Party ----------- 2 8.5.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the opposite party of all the cases. There is no denial to the fact that the names of the petitioners do not transpire in the First Information Report or in the charge-sheet and the complicity of all of them surfaced only in course of trial when they were summoned under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. That being so, this Court would direct the petitioners of all the aforementioned cases, namely, Ram Bali Mahto, Bijali Mahto @ Navin Kumar Mahto, Ram Badan Mahto and Babloo Mahto @ Anjani Kumar Swatantra respectively to surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today and on their so surrendering, the court below shall grant regular bail to all of them on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 2 Additional Sessions Judge, Rosera, Distt. Samastipur in connection with Sessions Trial No. 688 of 2005 arising out of Rosera P.S. Case No. 44 of 2005, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further that if they would remain absent on even a single day in course of trial without any reasonable cause or are found to be responsible in causing delay in disposal of the trial, their bail so granted shall stand cancelled. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)