1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 200 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6597 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.236 OF 2009 Vasanti Ramesh Dubli. ..Appellant. v/s. Shivaji Dadu Mane & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.A.K.Tripathi i/b. Shri P.V.Dhopatkar for appellant. Mr.G.R.Rege i/b. G.J.Sabnis for Respondent No.1. Mr.R.N.Kachare for Respondent No.2. Mr.A.I.I.Patel, AGP for State. CORAM:- SWATANTER KUMAR,CJ. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED :- SEPTEMBER 2, 2009. P.C. 1. Present Appeal is directed against the Order dated 6th August, 2009, primarily on the ground that the order provides two reasons for granting of interim order. The Appellant before us had also filed an application for vacating the said order and it is stated that under the garb of order of status 2 quo, the Respondents in the Appeal are raising constructions. 2. We do not propose to interfere in the order of the learned Single Judge at this stage. While leaving all questions open, we grant liberty to the Appellant to make mention before the learned Single Judge for early disposal of the Petition, which is slated to be heard on 9th September, 2009. As far as other contentions, the Appellant is at liberty to take steps in accordance with the law. 3. The Appeal is disposed of with the above liberty without prejudice to the rights and contentions on merits of the either parties. 4. In view of disposal of Appeal, nothing survives in Civil Application. The same is disposed of accordingly. CHIEF JUSTICE A.M.KHANWILKAR, J