IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4136 of 2011 LAXMI SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 13.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named in the First Information Report, but an omnibus allegation of assault against the petitioner as well as other accused persons has been levelled. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that having, more or less, similar allegation some co-accused have already been granted privilege of bail by different benches of this Court, and so far as petitioner is concerned, there is no specific allegation against him. On the other hand learned counsel appearing for the informant submits that in further statement the informant has, specifically, stated that it was petitioner who gave fatal blow on the head of the deceased and the further statement of the informant is corroborated by not only several other eye witnesses but also by the postmortem report of 2 the deceased. Considering the above stated submissions as well as facts and circumstances of the case, I do not feel it proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case No.100 of 2010 stands rejected. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)