IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.7273 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 09.12.2009 Manpreet Singh .....Petitioner versus Kotak Mahindera Prime Limited. .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vijay Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 19.6.2009 passed by the Additional District Judge, Jalandhar, whereby an application purportedly for the release of the vehicle, alleged to have been forcibly taken away by the respondent-financing company, has been dismissed “on the request of learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner”. Since the impugned order has been passed on the request of the counsel for the applicant-petitioner himself, no case to interfere with it by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction is made out. It shall, however, not preclude the petitioner to approach the learned Additional C.R. No.7273 of 2009 (O&M) 2 District Judge, Jalandhar and to prove that no such request, as mentioned in the order dated 19.6.2009, was made by his counsel. Dismissed. 09-12-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE