The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.28231 of 2011 Date: 18.10.2011 Between: K.P.Vivekanand and another ..... Petitioners AND 1.The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund, Hyderabad and 2 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Gade Venkateswara Rao Counsel for the respondents: Sri A.Radhakrishna Reddy, Standing Counsel for GHMC The Court made the following: Order: The grievance of the petitioners in this Writ Petition is that even though respondent No.3 does not have even prima facie title, respondent No.2 has granted building permission in respect of part of the land out of total land admeasuring 4000 square meters in Survey No.44/A covered under Block No.6 situated at Mahender Nagar, Quthbullapur Circle, Hyderabad, on account of which the petitioners’ interests are suffering. At the hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that even though his clients have approached respondent No.2, with a request to receive their representation for revocation of building permission already granted in favour of respondent No.3, because of the ongoing strike by certain section of the employees of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation in connection with the Telangana agitation, the same is not being received. In the light of this grievance, respondent No.2 is directed to receive the petitioners’ representation, if any, filed and examine the prima facie title of the petitioners and respondent No.3. If respondent No.2 is satisfied that respondent No.3 does not have prima facie title, he shall take appropriate action in accordance with law after putting respondent No.3 on notice. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.34852 of 2011, filed by the petitioners for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 18th October, 2011 LUR