IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI THURSDAY, THE 23RD JULY 2009 / 1ST SRAVANA 1931 LA.App..No. 792 of 2009() ------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18/10/2007 IN LAR. 98 /2003 of SUB COURT,THODUPUZHA .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT ----------------------- SARASWATHIAMMA, W/O. SANKARA NARAYANAN, PALANICKAL, THODUPUZHA. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L.A.A.No.792 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius.C.Kuriakose, J. We do not find any ground to admit this appeal which pertains to acquisition of land in Thodupuzha village for the construction of Kanjiramattom-Mangattukavala road. The relevant Section 4(1) notification was published on 29-11-1999. The land acquisition officer awarded land value of Rs. 12,352/- per Are which was refixed on the basis of the evidence which came on record at Rs. 56,700/- per Are. We notice the judgment of this court in State of Kerala v. Jose Simon ( 2009(1) KLT 760) which was in respect of acquisition for the very same purpose, but pursuant to a notification on 18-02-2000. We find that under the above judgment, this court has granted proportionately much more amounts than what is granted under the impugned judgment to the properties in the same village. For all the reasons stated in the judgment of this court in State of Kerala v. Jose Simon ( 2009(1) KLT 760), this appeal will stand dismissed. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI JUDGE sv.