IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7988 of 2010 RAJEEV KUMAR KANOJIA, SON OF LATE JAGDISH KANOJIA, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.E/32, CHATARPUR EXTENSION, P.S. CHATARPUR, NEW DELHI. ……………………………………………………..PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…………………..…OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : M/s. Ajay Kumar Thakur and Malay Kumar Choudhary, Advocates. For the State : Mrs. Asha Devi, A.P.P. ------------ 2. 12.3.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 406, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case, still learned counsel submits that the petitioner is ready to pay the cheque amount of Rs.80,000/- to the informant subject to the result of the trial concerned. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 25.1.2010. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Rajeev Kumar Kanojia, is directed to be 2 released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Buxar, in connection with Complaint Case No.421©/09 , with a further condition that as per the undertaking the petitioner shall deposit the amount in dispute, i.e., Rs.80,000/-(Rupees Eighty Thousand) without being prejudice to this case before the court concerned in three instalments (first instalment at the time of furnishing the bail bonds) and further two instalments within three months therefrom and the complainant would be at liberty to withdraw the same. However, the withdrawl shall be subject to the result of the concerned trial. If the petitioner, after release on bail, fails to deposit the subsequent instalments then the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)