CRM No. M-7406 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-7406 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.05.2011 Sahib Singh Virk ....Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate, for complainant Mahal Singh. Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate, for complainant Gurinder Singh. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.32 dated 17.2.2011 under Sections 364/365 read with Section 34 IPC, Police Station Pundri District Kaithal. This Court vide order dated 10.3.2011 has directed to release the petitioner on interim bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has already been released on bail and the petitioner has joined the investigation and shall join the investigation as and when asked to do so by the Investigating Officer. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, on instructions from ASI Kashmir Singh, who is personally CRM No. M-7406 of 2011 (O&M) -2- present in Court, states that petitioner is co-operating in the investigation and custodial interrogation is not required. Learned counsel appearing for the complainants have vehemently opposed the bail application. Since custodial interrogation is not requested, therefore, this is a fit case to be allowed. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petition is allowed. Order dated 10.3.2011 is made absolute. (Alok Singh) Judge May 23, 2011 R.S.