IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 20260 of 2010 Date of Decision: November 15, 2010 Jagbir Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Jagbir Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of the writ petition with further submission that the representation made by the petitioner may be considered sympathetically and in accordance with law or any policy. Notice of motion. Ms. Mamta Singhal Talwar, AAG, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice. Two copies of the paper book have been handed over to her. After hearing learned counsel and taking into account the nature of the issue raised, we are of the view that the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is worth acceptance and, therefore, we allow withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty in terms of the prayer made. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (RITU BAHRI) November 15, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor