vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION CONTEMPT PETITION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.118 OF 2005 NO.118 OF 2005 NO.118 OF 2005 Mr.Manjinderjeet Singh & Ors. ... Petitioners V/s. The Chief Secretary of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.Salil Ray for Petitioners Mr.A.H. Palekar, AGP, for Respondent No.1 Mr.R.G. Ketkar for Respondent Nos.2 to 6 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This Contempt Petition has been filed alleging violation of the order of the Division Bench dated 31.3.2004. According to the Petitioners, commencement certificates have been issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation i.e., Respondent Nos.2 to 6 permitting constructions of buildings in violation of clauses 2 to 7 of the notification dated March 24, 1989 and guidelines dated January 21, 1998 as well as section 9A of the Aircraft Act, 1935. The Petitioners submit that constructions have been permitted "around air field". 2. This Petition has been replied to by the Pune Municipal Corporation through the affidavit filed by : 2 : Shri Shantaram Khanderao Thorat, Development Engineer (Building Control Department), where he has categorically stated in paragraphs 10 thus: X. I say that these Respondents have not granted any building permission contrary to various clauses in Annexure "I" of the said Notification. Similarly, these Respondents have not granted building permissions contrary to Annexure "III" of the said Notification. I further say that these Respondents have not granted any building permission contrary to the various clauses in Annexure ’II’ of the said Notification. In fact, in the earlier affidavit filed by Shri Dattatraya S. Pharate in P.I.L. No.117 of 2003, these aspects have been dealt with. I crave liberty of this Hon’ble Court to make appropriate submissions at the time of hearing of Contempt Petition. 3. This statement made by the Development Engineer (Building Control Department) is accepted. No case for contempt has been made out. Petition rejected.