1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3141 OF 2011 Paranjay Purushottamdas Goradia .. Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.Hitesh Shah for the petitioner. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, APP for the State. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE: 8th December, 2011. P.C.: 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will not press this petition provided the Court may observe in the order that in future if the petitioner prefers application for grant of furlough leave, the authorities will decide the same on its own merits. 2. The learned APP submits that he has no objection if the petitioner is withdrawing the petition, but that should be done without any observation by the Court. We are in agreement with the submission of the learned APP. The learned APP further submits that as and when the petitioner applies to the appropriate authority for furlough leave or parole, that application will be decided in 2 accordance with law, keeping in mind the norms specified in the prevailing regulations. 3. In this view of the matter, we dispose of this petition as withdrawn by the petitioner. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)