k^- 'etltionsi \^s •A'rre petisson (Ci NO fr. •idui&yyt 'Wdi'O. Bai jyotiki, Shyamsunder Jyotiki, aged abouf 44 ysars, Occupation : House v'y'ife, R/'o. Vii!age : Bramhpara Ambikspur, Poitee Station & Tahsil : Ar Distt.Surguja (C.G.) r'3'yM i>* 2. 3. Mrtduj Kumar Jyotiki, S./o. Shyam Sunder Jyofiki, sgsd about : 24 yesrs, R/o. Viilage : Punjab Bank Coiony; JabaSpur, Poiice Statlon & Tahsii Jabaipur (r«4.P.) Smt.^mia Bai, Wd/o. Shyamsunder Jyotiki; aged about 50 yesrs, R/o. .1^1 \^ Jabaipur, Pollce Statlon & Tahsli Jabaipur (n/i.P.) Present R/o. Tiwari 'uj'djna pur, jrgujs (C.G.; Disiriet Education Offlcer, Educatton Depsrtment, Sisrguja, B.T.I. Hoste!, Banarss Road, Ambikapur, Distt.: lAtrif ?5&'F*^*r\i^ ' i!t~'.'*i^!' A?4tri>-E^^ "t^'T rt.iF''tS^^ <^lri)nio4-i4)i ^vt^i.f s^ni. r cfcK,!^! i uUUiSl /-ti i.iti/ic; ^L^.! ^i s.Uc; \^UE i> ^r.Arun Shukia, counsei for the petitiORsrs. .Sunii Tripathi, counsei for respondents No.1 and 2. Ms Sangeeta Mishra, Panei L sn f/^,v fr-.i ;/\j"t(^^>^41 t\A/\ ^'O^^n Tor rssponcsnt No.s/atate. Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Shs (7-12-2011) 1. By ihis wrii petitson under Artlcie 227 of ths Constitution of india ihe petitioner has chaiienged the iegailty and propriety of the order daied 25.6.2007 passed by fhe Ctvii Judge Class-i, Ambikapur, in Succession Csse No.2y/2002, v/hereby appiication for stay of paymeni fiied on behaif of the petitioner has been dismissed. ^ 8 z 2. I have heard leamed counsei for ths psrtles, perused ihe 0,-dsr impugned ;y\f^ ?«T.in.tf^e /<>•? ^.»*^&<' ^<^<n.i !iipni?\ipi.4'^^ ?d:i*i,<4 /^.v\ ifi<^ ^UiJi^is U( 'ijtLi ftti ^^^UsiiiO it.-S? fii^u tJsi sla'4 r^r^ hflih^tf rsf +ha rt'&Ti-i'i^ni's Lf^ficSii vi (.( ticner. 3. As per submissions of fhe parties, iRiiiaily succession certificate was issued on the basis of eompromise befween the parties but at present they are reciting from compromise and have fiied ths appiicstion for recaHJng the succession certificate, in whteh ths petitionsr has appiied for <sf^v nf n^vm?>rsf Considering the fsct that initlaiiy succession certiflcate was issued on the bssis of compromise, i do not find any llleganty in the order impugned warranting interference. Consequently, ihe 'A'rst pstition Is iisbie to be and it te hereby dismssseo. No ordsr as to costs. 5. i.A.No.01 for interim rsiief stands disposed of. Sd/- T. P. Shamia Judge ^-