IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2009 / 2ND POUSHA 1931 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 4015 of 2009() ------------------------------ CRA.180/2008 of ADDL. SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC) III, PALAKKAD ST.934/2007 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-II, PALAKKAD .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------------------------------ H.AMINASH,S/O.HANEEFA, RESIDING AT GRAPHIC PARK, KANNARA STREET, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL) RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT & STATE: -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE PALAKKAD RURAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.P1180 PALAKKAD, OPPOSITE INDIRA GANDHI STADIUM, PALAKKAD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY M.SOBHA, AGED 38 YEARS, W/O.GOVARDHANAGIRI. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RITHWIK. THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.S.GOPINATHAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.R.P.No.4015 of 2009. = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2009. O R D E R The Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-II, Palakkad in ST.No.934/2007 on his file convicted the revision petitioner for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to simple imprisonment for six months and to pay Rs.45,000/- as compensation to the first respondent who is the complainant before the trial court. In Crl.Appeal No.180/2008, the Addl.Sessions Judge, Adhoc-III, Palakkad confirmed the conviction. The substantive sentence was reduced to a fine of Rs.50,000/- with a default sentence of simple imprisonment for two months. 2. Assailing the legality, correctness and propriety of the above conviction and sentence as reduced in appeal, this revision petition was preferred. Crl.R.P.No.4015 of 2009. -: 2 :- 3. Today, when the revision petition came up for admission, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petitioner is seeking only time for payment of fine. Recording the submission, this revision petition is dismissed. The revision petitioner is granted six months time to pay the fine. Till then, the bail bond executed by him shall remain in force. P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE. Kvs/-