1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4133/09 Sheonarayan vs. Board of Revenue & Ors. Date of order : 18/5/2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Ashindra Gautam for the petitioner. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order of Board of Revenue dated 8.12.2008 by which the revision petition filed by the respondents has been allowed and the order of Assistant Collector, Sawaimadhopur dated 29.4.2006 has been set aside. By the aforesaid order, the Assistant Collector on application of the petitioner corrected the compromise degree passed on 5.9.2000. Learned counsel argued that the Board of Revenue has wrongly held that the status quo order passed with regard to record and the disputed property by the Civil Court on 16.1.2006 would not be applicable to the correction of the judgment and decree passed by the Revenue Court, which was made by the 2 Assistant Collector by his order dated 29.4.2006. It is argued that such a status quo order would be attracted only if the petitioner on the basis of corrections made in the compromise decree had requested for corresponding changes in the revenue records and not otherwise. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the impugned order, I am not inclined to uphold the argument. In the first place, when the correction that was prayed for was opposed by the respondents, the decree as originally passed on the basis of compromise, could no longer be corrected because then the compromise to that extent ceased to exist and secondly in the face of status quo order passed by the Civil Court on 16.1.2006 whereby the direction was issued for maintaining status quo with regard to records as well as possession of disputed property, the Assistant Collector was wholly unjustified in passing the order of correction on 29.4.2006. The Board of Revenue has rightly allowed the revision petition filed by the respondents. 3 The impugned order does not suffer from any error or infirmity. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/