1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 314 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 314 OF 2011 *** 1. Heard Advocate Mr. Sangeet for the Petitioner and learned A.G.P. for Respondent No.4. 2. It is apparent that earlier adjudication shows the absence of possession of Respondents on suit property and the same judgment also show failure on the part of present petitioner to establish acquisition of ownership by adverse possession. In this background, the Appellate Authority viz. Additional Divisional Commissioner, Nashik has found that the present petitioner has not brought on record anything to show that title which according to last registered document vested with Respondents has been ceased to so vest or has been displaced. 3. Advocate Mr. Sangeet argues that there is a registered agreement for sale in favour of petitioner and he is in possession of suit 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 314 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. property in terms thereof. It was, therefore, not necessary for the petitioner to question any sale deed muchless the sale deed executed in favour of vendor of Respondents by his vendor. During hearing, however, he points out that petitioner has filed Regular Civil Suit No. 236 of 1997 in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jalgaon for declaration of acquisition of his title by adverse possession. 4. It is apparent that revenue entries are only for fiscal purposes and are not binding on civil Courts. Here, the earlier judgments of civil Court are already noted by the revenue authority. However, it has found that those judgments did not displace title of Respondents. I am not inclined to comment on these findings because everything is subject to the adjudication in Regular Civil Suit No. 236 of 1997. With clarification that the observations and findings in impugned order 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.: 314 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. of Additional Commissioner shall not come in the way of petitioner in prosecuting his civil suit and said civil suit shall be decided independently on its own merit, present writ petition is disposed of. No costs. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:05/04/2011. ans/314