1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1423 of 2006 1. Laxmi Narayan Taparia and anr. .. Petitioners. Vs M/s Procter and Gamble Hygiene Ltd and anr .. Respondents. Mr R.R.Salvi, for the petitioners. Mrs M.M.Deshmukh, APP for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 9th AUGUST, 2006 DATED : 9th AUGUST, 2006 DATED : 9th AUGUST, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. In this petition, the petitioners have impugned the order dated 8.6.06 which reads thus:- "Perused. Heard. The application is filed for accused no.1 and 3. But the name of accused no.1 Laxmi Taparia is not mentioned in this application, nor she has signed. The application is filed against the order of issuing process. Therefore, the appearance and signature of both the accused persons are must. The M.A.09/06 was considered in the interest of justice which was filed by accused no.3 by herself and by Adv.for accused no.1. This application cannot be considered without the name, signature and appearance of accused no.1 Laxmi Taparia and the appearance of accused no.3 Girijadevi Taparia. Hence, the application will be considered after compliance the same." It is open for the petitioners to comply with the 2 2 2 formalities the learned Judge has referred to in the aforesaid order. He can also file Vakalatnama duly signed by accused no.1 and attested by the concerned authority in the revision. If the compliance is not made within six weeks from today, the revision shall stand dismissed for nonprosecution without further reference to the Court. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)