IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No. 657 of 2011 Date of Decision: April 28, 2011 Surender Pal and Meena Kumari ..... Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana and others. .....Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. Amandeep Singh Cheema, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raja Sharma, AAG, Haryana for respondent-State. ***** JORA SINGH, J (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for directing the respondents to produce the detenue Reena Kumari daughter of the petitioners. In pursuance of the notice, learned State counsel has filed reply and according to reply, on 11.03.2011, the detenue Reena Kumari informed the Deputy Commissioner of Police, West Gurgaon through fax message that she has left her matrimonial house due to daily disputes with her husband and on 18.03.2011 she made a statement that she has gone alongwith her friend and wants to go to her parental house and as such she was sent with the petitioners on 19.03.2011. It has also been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the present petition has become infructuous as the custody of the alleged detenue was handed over to the petitioners. In view of the abovesaid reply and statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, no further action is required to be taken at this stage. Hence, the present petition has become infructuous and is dismissed accordingly. April 28, 2011 (JORA SINGH) sham JUDGE