@ (9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) $INGLE @EN§§“~3 WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3S/ é / 2006 K Co-operative Department/ Registrar, Co-operative Societies Raipur, C.G. 3. The Deputy Registrar, / Co—operative Societies Kanker, C.G. i / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUENCE OF WRIT IN THE PETITIONER: Ani! Kumar Banaj, / S/o Shri M.S. Banaj, aged about 36 years, f 4‘ R/o Village Raikana, Block Bilaigarh, District Raipur, C.G. Present Address At./ Po. M..¢‘ .3 .«'*>\\.: Pankhgggilgisgrict North Bastar Q-«v ¢?’ c? w;- I Q‘ ‘0 (Kanker) , C.G. $b VERSUS RESPONDENTS: : 1. State 0f Chhattisgarh, / Through the Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Co—operative Department, ’D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur, C.G. The Commissioner, XI—HC—78 H W , W , W inn-mm ‘ ”‘PBSI/é .. 1H 0$ Wm(W) WWW mmmm ’ agwm 18-7-2006 Mr. Satvendra Sahu, co y y working as Co-operative Exten ' n Omcer. Learned counsel for the peu‘tioner submits that the ‘ petitioner is working in the Miss Deepali Pande Panel Lawyer for the State] mspondents, on advance cop Heard both the counsel. By the instant writ pe tion, the peWoner has questioned the transfer order dated 0-6-2006 whereby he has been transferred h‘om Pakhglur to antewada. The petitioner is e area since last ten years and he has again been hansferre to the Naxalite area, whereas after serving ten years in the Nax te area, the petitioner ought to have area. He further submits that therefore, the petitioner may e allowed to make a representation to respondent No. 1 and respo dent No. 1 be directed to decide the same, to which learned cou objection. Having heard learned «:ounsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and chmlmstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is just, fair and Ieasonable. Therefore, the petitioner ' allowed to make a detailed representation along with a py of this petition to respondent No.1, within a period of l days from today and in turn, respondent No. 1 shall decide e representation of the petitioner in P.T.O. for the State/respondents has no 1 r 20 N ‘t n XI-HC—78 WW WW W .o..~o..o.o. mm (WW) m zooé WWW s). WWW mmwm ‘WW§NW 3?311%H3Tl%$ ‘ 'an objective manner consic petitioner, within a period of 3( rcpmsentau'on, in accordance \ With the dimcn'on aforew In vicw of this order, M.(‘ of. Parties are entitled for cc Soma Len'ng the points raised by the ) days mam the date of receipt of the Vith law. aid, the petition stands disposed of. N.)P.No.2705/2006 stands disposed rtided copy of this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge 1