$1ng13“ Sench D 3 m THE HxGH COURT 01v JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CG) mam mam-101v No. 19) é; 0? 2005 §ETVE EN i /Lachha mar wands}. ,7 aged about 43v years s/o Late ’1 Budhiyar chandel, Resiaent of Aama mlab Road, post Gffice Ward, D§strict Dhamtari (CG). ‘1 ‘7 Ema? IONER ANE The State of dqhatta‘sgarh, through the Secre tary mpartmeni of school Education, Mantralay. ‘ D.K.S.Building, Raipur (CG). /Z. The Iireciorf mblic mstructions, Raipur (Cg). Dham taxi , District mamtari (CG). The District Education »O€4:‘icer, Dhamtari. aistrict Dhammri (CG). /'3.:’ 'Ihe collector: ”5’ /go‘ The Principal; Government Girl's Higher Seecnaary school, Dhamtari. District Dhamtari (CG). /6’{ Ehe Head Master; Government Poorva Madhyamik shala Bhaigaon District mamtari (co). RESPoENw; NDo , wRlT PET'LTEON UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 op Tm CONS’I‘I TUEEON OF ETDIA g5 ' »/4 M Xl~HC-78 WWWW 51 WPMé W §ma§ “200 5 anéat W5 (am) anwm iém‘ai awanésmwiai ‘ J V ’ mmwmw ammi Wirw! q: $Wané21 17.6.2005 Smt, Renu Kochar, co1mse1 for thB petitioner. Shri P.s. Koshy, Dy. Advocate General Efer the State/ respondents No. 1 to 4, . Heard finally wifh> the consent of the parties. This petition has been filed, challenging the iinpugned order dated 3.12.2004 '(Annexure P-S) by which, the netitioner has been suspendeé under the rules applicable in his case. Notices were issued by this Court. ‘ It is stated that the pre respondents has been filed 01 A copy of this submis that after issuance of the su de para 2 of the written submission liminaiy submission on behalf of the i 14,6.2005. " State counsel. It is stated vi sion has been shown to my by the > spension orde1 dated 12 2004 a depaitmental enquiry was cc nducted against the petitioner and the same has been finally concluded. The petitioner has been held guilty of non-compliance punishment has been impos annual increment with cumu the period of suspension hasl The impugned suspension order has been revoked and the posting order of the petitione of the order and therefore, ;a minor ed upon the petitioner stopping 1 lative effect. )een treated as It is also stated’that period on duty. r has been issued. The petitioner has joined on 26.5.2005 at his new place of posting. The copy of the final order passed in the departmental proceedings and copy [\3 Xl-HC-78 mmm$ . .....‘ ..“ . $11200 v ‘ , mww (aErFm) mmw'mw N L ‘3 1’: §T§QT 377'W am anésmwfm r: / sunita ‘$3T%wsné21 ‘ of the joining report of the pé titioner have been filed as Annexures R—l (‘35 R—2 respectively. Since, the departmental enquiiy itsel£ has been concluded and further the order of suspension has been revoked and the petitioner has been . reinstated, this petition has become infmctuous; There is no necessity of passing any orderregarding quashment ‘of the impugned suspension order. The petition stands finally disposed of: There shall be no orders as to costs. I i / /////gal’ ‘ S‘“\\$ s“"""€swagi»/"/ ““w _\,£* -»,—,,,,