-.-^ i). ^- — t- Y^^ IN THE HICTi COU;;?T OF JUDICATUIE AT JA.BALPUR WRIT PETITION NO.J_^^__/1998» (WBIT PETITJON UMDE^ A^TICLE 226/227 CF TKS CONSTITUTION Op IMDIA) / ./ ) 1. PETITIONEi^i ^SPO.NDEOT.S : GRASIM CSHENT, . \ A Unit of Graslm Industries Limited^ V: A corapany incorporated under the j' provislons of Indian Ctopanies Act,l956,j having its registered Office at '! Birlagram^ Nagda and Factory at l Grasim Vihar, Village & Post Office- /: Rawan, Tahsil Simga, District,aaJ.pur(MP).^ ^- //Versus// Fi 1« State of Madhya Pradesh, ' Through-secretary,Land Revenue, ;^ ' Vallabh Bhawan, EHOPAL (MP). ' J'-f 2. The Commissioner, Raipur (M.P«)^^p^ 3» 'Fhe Collector, ttaipur (M.P<)»-~-;'" - 4» The Sub-Divisioaal Officec, Baloda Basar, Dlstt.Eiaipur (MP). 5, The Sub-Divisional Officer, Bhatapara. District, t^aipur (MP) < 6* Kamalnarayan S/o Pachkodram Dhruwa• 7a Hiralal S/o Johifcram Kuruwanshi. 8. Hemlal S/o Girwar Dhruwa.. 9» Tejiram S/o Phoolsingh D-nruwa* 10. Pandwaram s/o Tijauram Respondents 6 to 10 resident of village-Sarseni.Tahsil-simga, Di.st rict,^aipur (M.p,), 11» Radheshyara S/o Bodhiram Dhruwa 12. Guhartam s/o Jodhan Dhruwa 13» Ramratan S/o Birsingh Dhruwa Respondents 11 to 13 resident cf Yxllage-Chuchrungpur.Tahsil-slmr/a* Digtrict, aaipur~-(M.P<)» •2* 1 •) 3»B—^' -h^ w'>.. i^\ ^'^c^^ ^^''\^jy' ^ c^ .... 'r^ ^\ ^ !.....^^ CLIL'^~ E . -. lc^^ ^ 'c^.^ g?v" <^' l^ ^' -2- 14^ smt. Kusumbai D/o Bahursingh Dhruwa» 15. Bisram S/o Neelkanth shikafl. 16. sonsay S/o Siya£am Shikari 17» ^arika S/o siyaram Shikari ^omnaUx-S/e- k£s -y^. r? IS^—Shi^datts/o Scvakram Ve^ma- Sespondents No»l4 to l9 resi<3ent of vlllage Chhirahi Tahsil Simga^ Digtrict, Raipur (M,Pt,)< 20^ Motila 1 S/o 3ant ram Ve rma . 21* shivoharan S/o Naresh Kumar Bhru^a^ 22* Notersingh s/o sukhdeo Prasad Dhruwa» 23« Khorbahararam 3/o Dheluram Vishwakarma. 24, Birajhram S/o Shivlal Ya<3av 25, Ramkishun 3/0 Sadaram , • 26. sukhiram s/o itwari Gond 27 • Pcemdas S/o BaUram Rao. Respondents 20 to 27 cesldent of village- ' Chuchrangpur Tahsil-Simga,Distt. i^a ipur (MP) WRIT PETITION UNDE^ ARTICl.^226/227_Qi^lmE^ e9rlstitution of India ^ W.P.Na179/1998 Pa^l&fS HK3H COURT OF CJ*iATTiSGARH AT BiLASPUR (SB: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Shamna. J.i Writ Peftition No.179 of 1§§8 Psftltloner Grasim Cement Respondents Versus 1. State of Madhya Pradesh 2. The Commlssior^r, Raipur 3. The Coiiector, Ralpur 4. The Sub-Divisiona! Offteer, Baioda Bazar 5. The Sub-Divisionai Offlcer, Bhatapa-a 6. KamaSnarayan 7. Hiraiai 8. Hemlal 9. Tejiram 10. Pandwaram 11. Radheshyam 12. Guhartam 13. Ramratan 14. Smt.Kusumtoai 15. Bisram 16. Sonsay 17. E3warika 18. Somnath 19. ShNdatt 20. Motilai Deleted D@ieted 21. Shivcharan ^: W.P^Jo. 179/1998 P<^e2©f3 22. Noharsingh , 23. Haiorbahararam 24. Birajhram 25. Ramkishun 26. Sukhiram 27. Premdas (Writ Petition under Articie 226/227 ofthe Constitution ofindte) Mr.Bhaskar Payashi, ccsjnseS for the petitsoner. Mr.Ajay Dwivedi, Dsputy Govemment Adyocate f^r r^pomNnts^ No.1 to 5/State. , Mr.Mahendra Dubey, counsei for respondents No.6 ta 17 and 20 toi 27. - ' ! •l::i;' • •" ' :sl' ":;:" :: 1-::;-:-:::— Of^)ER -:. : • • • —..--,-— (Passed on 18th September, 2012) i. By this vvrit petition under Articte 226/227 of tte Cwstitutlon of (nclia the petitioner has prayed for quashment of the memo dat^ 6.1.1998 (Annexure P/29) issusd by the OoiSector, Raipur, whereby the Coilector has directed the p^tttoner to provide ^rvice to 22 persons whom the Coiiector has granted condltional permisaon to sale their iands to the petitioner under Sectton 1^(6) ofthe C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959 (for short the Code'). 2. Learned counseS for the petitioner submtts that whtSe granting permission under Section 165(6) of the Code the Colteotor was ncA competent to Impo^ any condition except to grant or to refuse the permlssion, but by passing the order respondent No.3 has ccmmttted iiiegaiity. 3. i have perused the orders granting conditionai permisslon dat@d 24.11.1992 to provide service to prlvate respondents by the C©iSector, although same are not under ehallenge. 4. Specific condition has been mentioned in se order as per para 2 which reads thus:- w ur\ . . .. ., . , . ...„.._ \:-.*^^ ? ..s^A. " . ^ '^y% 1 '. ^-y J>.N6.17M998 Pa@e3of3 B2.^?ir ^nf^pr ^^vi. f^?iT ^ 1qf^T? ^ ^pt ^R^T %t BW^ ^il^di "^ SI^T? ^q^ "^R^i^ ^ %^f ^t Pi^f^d ^f I" 5. At the time of purchasing the iands frora prl^ate respon^ents the petitioner was at iiberty to purchase the is^ds or retese to purchase the Sands considering the condition. The present petftioner has not fi!ed petitjon against aforesaid 22 ordees. i do not find @ny greund for interference in the aforesaid orders. 6. Consequentiy, the writ petftion being without si<)stance is llable to be dismissed and is hereby ciismsssed. However, the petitsoner te a?t liberty to fiie approprjate petltion against the aforesaid ordersoract in accordance with the aforesaid facts. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge