THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.A.NO. 244 of 2010 15-04-2010 BETWEEN; M.Krishna Reddy and others ...Petitioners vs. Government of A.P. rep. by its Principal Secretary, Agrl.Marketing Department and others ...Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.A.NO.244 of 2010 ORAL ORDER: (Per GR,J) This appeal is against the order of the learned single judge dated 18 03-2010 allowing WVMP No.1158 of 2010 filed by the 3r respondent herein seeking vacation of an interim order dated 06-01-201 granted in the writ petition whereby the respondents in the writ petitio were directed not to proceed with the auctions for allotment of shops i favour of the licensees at Gudimalkapur flower market located within th Agricultural Market Committee, Hyderabad (AMC). The appellants and others were in the flower-vending business in th Jam Bagh area of the city. The shops at Jam Bagh area were shifted to th AMC area at Gudimalkapur and an area therein was earmarked fo establishment of shops for vending flowers. Admittedly, the petitioner were not issued licenses for vending flowers at Gudimalkapur and th respondents herein, in particular the AMC was proceeding to conduc auctions for allotment of shops in favour of licensees. Challenging the non-grant of licenses, the writ petition was filed an an interim order passed on 06.01.2010 directing the respondents herei not to proceed with allotment of shops in favour of the licensees. The 3r respondent’s application for vacating the stay was allowed by th impugned order and the interim stay granted on 06-01-2010 was vacated. The learned single judge recorded the reason that unless the wr petitioners succeed in establishing the alleged illegalities and irregularitie in the award of licenses, they will not be in a position to participate in th auctions and bid for shops and meanwhile if the auctions are interdicte public interest would be adversely effected and the balance o convenience and irreparable injury are not in favour of the writ petitioners. We find no error in the exercise of discretion by the learned singl judge, warranting interference in this appeal. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission No order as to costs. ______________ GODA RAGHURAM,J ______________ NOUSHAD ALI,J 15th APRIL 2010. TSNR