IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17697 of 2008 UPENDRA KUMAR SINGH & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 15.5.2008 Heard. The modification petition has been filed seeking the modification of the order dated 23.8.2007 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 37619 of 2007 on the ground that the time frame of four weeks set out by this court for furnishing the bonds as directed by it having elapsed, the same needs to be extended. On perusal of the order dated 23.8.2007 indicated above, I could not locate a single word fixing any time frame for admission of the petitioners to anticipatory bail on furnishing of the bonds as directed to be executed by them. There is specific statement made in the modification petition to the above effect that the court had fixed a time frame. The petition is not only frivolous but also appears scandalous as regards the order passed by this court inasmuch as the petition and the statements made therein which were never recorded by the court. This act appears unprofessional as also unethical as regards the Advocate filing and moving the petition and at the same time to the profession. The petition appears not only frivolous but a clear example as to how an Advocate has wasted the public time and burdened the court by filing completely frivolous petition. The Advocate namely Md. Mussowir is warned to be cautious in future in receiving instructions and acting accordingly and also in filing - 2 - frivolous petitions. The petition is dismissed. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J)