IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 24 OF 2010 SHRI NABRAJ ANANT PRABHU AND 5 ORS THROUGH POA MR. YOGRAJ SHANBHAG ... Applicant Versus THE GOA URBAN CO-OP BANK LTD AND 10 ORS., ... Respondents Mrs. A.A. Agni, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. R.G. Ramani, Advocate for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Ajit R. Kantak, Advocate for Respondent No. 7. Coram:- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date:- 24th March, 2011 P.C.: This is an appeal by the Original Defendant Nos. 9 to 15 against a Decree of possession passed by the lower Appellate Court. Regular Civil Suit No. 417/2000/B is decreed and the first respondent is held to be entitled to seek possession of the premises shown in Plan-III of the Agreement dated 02-12-1982. 2. Prima facie, the second appeal having been admitted, the execution and implementation of the Decree of the lower Appellate Court is required to be stayed till the hearing and disposal of this appeal. However, bearing in mind that the Decree is for possession of immovable property and it is in possession of the applicant/appellant, it is directed the execution of the Decree be stayed on the condition that applicant/appellant shall not part with possession nor create third party rights in what so ever manner in respect of the immovable property which is subject matter of the Decree. Further, the applicant/appellant shall also pay taxes and other dues in respect of the said property. 3. Miscellaneous Civil Application stands disposed of in these terms with no order as to costs. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. EV