C^- ffi^ 3 SSnate Bst. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.1 W.P.fSl N0. ^L|I|& /2009 PETITIONER ••'. i^^-y. >^il^ ^>v'.. l^^ ^ ^ >/ <:-> RESPONDENTS 1. Bhuwan Jangade, S/o. A.R. Jangade, aged about 39 years, Lab- Technician, posted at Community Health Centre, Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.). VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Public Health and Family Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Director, Health Services, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Chief Medical Officer and Health Officer, Mahasamund (C.G.) Block Medical Officer, Mahasamund, District Raipur (C.G.) Dr. Mahavir Agrawal, S/o. Shri Kashiram Agrawal, Chief Medical Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 5. 6. <" ! -HG—78 'a^nv 3IR?i SiWfi "S'SET '<(|A|i(f4, anl'y'is, facii'yy ri^..y.:.?:.^.).. :..3M?/... sn^?T tR?;' ('yf^'^r) ^ ^^iiwafNsii^?' Mr. Raahvendra Pradhar fvir. Yashwant Singn Th Mc Cnni+s . lain P! f"r thps'S.taf lv't\s. vJ'Ui iiiCt ufdii i, s~ i- i^i fci i-*-; \-'i.u*, Challenae in the instant 30.6.2009 (Annexure-P-1) pass Chief Medica! and Heaith Offjc working on the post of Lab Centre, Pithora has been tran Patsendri (Saraipali), on admini Counsel for the petltione order has been Issued by the persona! venaeance because t a.qainst the said respondent Nc basis of comoiaint made b\ Commission has aiready Superintendent of Poiice to submits that the petitioner ha^ victimization and therefore, tSni He also submits that in his pre^ has compieted onlv one year bi| taktn qi|<ilyl4tTl 'RTO^f ^ '^^t <f^-M.i< ^'aiRpTsn^i Dit I, counsel for the Detitioner. &Kur, uy. Advocate General witri |5 ^rit petition is to the order dated 'ed bv the respondent No. 4 - The er, by whlch the petitioner who is "echnician at Gommunity Health sferred to Prlmarv Hea!th Centre gtrative around. ' submits that the present transfer 4 on account of ne petliioner had made compiaint ; 4. He further submits that on the the Detitioner, Human Riahts >n coanizance and directed the conduct an enqulrv. He further been transferred as a matter of s order deserves to be guashed. / ient placs of postina the petitioner it vet hs hss been shifted. -SK-991«Wt--» -HE—78 SIT^I^Tf^R? 1 a'qi 3]]^I stuicji | ^iseh '3^ .*ii<4i<n<4, eitliyis, fqwi'yy 3^1 T^?7 ('^fl^'S^) 'Rgiw ^fta wt^ ^raferaiTqTERif TI fsW ifat^K -'2.- <^ aifrosn^M On the other hand, iean that let the petitioner make a No. 1 and the same would be d Accordinaiv, the writ oeti to the petltioner to fiie repres withln 10 davs from the date o same wouid be decided bv t? further period of three weeks fr accordance with iaw. |ed counsei for the State submits Irepresentation to the respondent ecided in accordance with !aw. :i.on is disoosed ofwith a dlrection sntation to the respondent No. 3 f receipt of CODV of this order. the ie authorities concerned within a 3m th'e date of its receiot strictlv in Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge