IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33516 of 2010 PUTTU SINGH @ FUTTU SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 20.09.2010 Petitioner is languishing in jail in a case registered under Section 392 of the I.P.C. Though there is no recovery from the petitioner but petitioner was identified by the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that much after his arrest petitioner was identified and similarly situated accused person Sheo Mangal Mahato has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 44067 of 2009. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner namely Puttu Singh @ Futtu Singh, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 68 of 2009 subject to the conditions (i)that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner(ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that 2 the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail (iii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concern if he petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)