IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.5259 of 2010 JAGDEO PD . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. . ----------- 3/ 22/06/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties. This Court had directed consideration of the case of the petitioner for grant of A.C.P. benefits in light of the reliance placed on certain orders of this Court. Once the opposite parties have considered the case of the petitioner in light of the judgements and have distinguished his case from the applicability of those judgements, the scrutiny thereof cannot be held further in contempt jurisdiction. Whether the distinction sought to be made on behalf of the opposite parties from the judgements relied upon by the petitioner are matters which can more appropriately be enquired, investigated and considered in a fresh writ petition only. The contempt application stands disposed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)