1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4425 OF 2009 Ramlal Onkar Choudhari .. petitioners Versus Election Officer of Nutan Mandki Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Society Ltd. Mandki .. Respondent. --- Mr. P.P. Chavan Advocate for petitioner. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 14th July, 2009. ORAL ORDER :- 1] By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 24/6/2009 vide which the application filed by the present petitioner objecting the acceptance of certain nomination papers came to be rejected. 2 2] It was the contention of the petitioner that certain persons have proposed more than one name and, therefore, the forms should not have been accepted. 3] The petition is liable to be dismissed on two grounds :- . Firstly, the petitioner has not impleaded the persons who are likely to be affected by any of the orders passed by this court as party respondents and as such, the petition suffers from non joinder of necessary parties. . Secondly, the returning officer has rightly observed that the proposers are voters in the voters list. As such they could propose as many nominations for as many posts in the category on which the candidates are to be elected. 4] No infirmity could be found with the approach adopted so as to warrant interference in writ jurisdiction. Hence, writ petition is rejected. \ [B.R. GAVAI,J.] Grt/-