1 Appln 2818-10 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2818 OF 2010 Vijay alias Kalu Rambhau Gaikwad ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Shekhar A. Ingawale, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.Geeta Mulekar, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 27TH SEPTEMBER, 2010 P.C. . The applicant who abducted businessman and his son for getting ransom seeks enlargement on bail. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that role of the applicant is similar to that of Chandrakant Gopal Javir. Statements of the victims do not show that Chandrakant participated in all the acts in which the applicant participated. In fact, after the first act of abduction and dragging the victim to the back seat of the 2 Appln 2818-10 van, in further activity it is only the applicant who has played the lead role. 2. In view of this, there is no question of parity. Considering nature of evidence collected and the fact that charge sheet has already been filed, application for bail is rejected. The learned trial Judge would endeavour to dispose of the case as early as possible since the applicant is in jail and complete the trial within a period of six months. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)