HIGH COT.mT OF CHHATTTSGARB A.T BH.ASPT.TR PETITIONER \1RESPOPQ)ENTS : Wiit Petitioffi No. 4328 of2005 Shyam Bhushan Das, S/o Shavaii Das, Aged about 45 years, R/o Puraiii Basti, Khatgaora, District Korba (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS 1. State of Cliliattisgarh, Tlirough the Secretary, Departmeiit of Tnbal Welfare, DKS Biiilding, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 2. Secretary, General Adtrdtiistiatioii Department^ Govenmient ofChhatti^garh, R.aipur (CG). 3. The Commissioner^ Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur 4. The Collector, Korba, District Korba (CG). 5. T!ie .As^istant Commissioner, Tribal Wetfare Department Korba (CG). (WRTT PETmON TJNDER ARTTCIE ?.2fi/27.7 OF THE CONSTTTTmON OF TNDIA) (SB: HontUeMr. Salisii K. AgiiflwtijJ.) Preseiit : Shri 8 R J. Jaiswal, Advocate fnr tbe petitioner Smt. Sniita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on tMs 10BI ofApriI, 2008) 1. With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for hearmg finally. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to coiitest the matter on merit« However, the petitioiier prays for libeity to make represeTitation before the authorities concemed to consider his case for compassionate appomtment m the li^it of circiilar dated 10.06.2003 (Ajiiiexiire P/7), 011 ite owii merit, to which leamed counsel appearing ibr the State has 110 objectioo 3 Withoiit expressiiig any opmioo on merit^ the petitioiier is graiited liberty to make representation before the coiicenied authority. The respondent authorities may consider the case ofthe petitioner if any representation is made, in accordance with law, expeditiousfy. 4. Tliis petition is accordmgly disposed ofwith the above stated liberty. No order asto costs. ——— Sahu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge