1 cra630 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.630 OF 2011 M/s.Palekar & Co. ...Applicant vs. Bejonji Dinshaji Engineer & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.N.V.Walawalkar, Sr.Counsel with Mr.Suresh Sabrat for the applicant None for the respondents CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 14, 2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned senior counsel for the applicant. The applicant is the second defendant in a suit filed by the 1st and 2nd respondents. The suit was dismissed for non prosecution on 20th January 2005. An application for restoration of the suit was taken out by the 1st and 2nd respondents which was dismissed by the Trial Court. In an appeal preferred by the said respondents, the order of dismissal of the application for restoration as well as the dismissal of the suit has been set aside and the suit has been restored. 2 The submission is that there was no case made out for restoration of the suit and that there was a gross default on the part of the respondent nos.1 and 2. 3 The suit was dismissed on 20th January 2005 and 2 cra630 application for restoration was filed on 18th February 2005 in which reasons have been set out for absence of 1st and 2nd respondents. 4 There is no error of jurisdiction. There is no reason to interfere with the reasoned order passed by the Appeal Bench of Court of Small Causes by which the suit has been restored. Revision application is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE