1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6086 OF 2010 Prabhakar R. Dambhare -: VERSUS :- Sham S. Mahajan and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : DECEMBER 22, 2010. Heard. The trial court found that there was no sufficient reason for adjournment for further cross- examination of witness of petitioner/plaintiff. It has referred that the process of recording his evidence was going on for about one year. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the witness was examined for the first time on 18.10.2010. The suit is of the year 2004 and now it is 2010. Trial court has recorded that his chief and part cross- examination was over on 18.10.2010. Witness was not available for further cross-examination on 25.10.2010. The Court granted adjournment and on 08.11.2010 again witness was not made available. The trial court in absence of medical certificate held that plaintiff is not entitled for adjournment. Even before this court petitioner/plaintiff has not filed any medical certificate. Thus, I do not find 2 any juridical error or perversity. Petition is rejected. No costs. JUDGE. Hirekhan