1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.06.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE K.SUGUNA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.ARUMUGHASWAMY W.P.(MD).No.5308 of 2011 G.Kumar : Petitioner Vs. 1. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, 119, Uthamar Gangdhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 3. The Sub – Inspector of Police, Manamadurai Police Station, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District. 4.K.Shanmuga Sundaram 5.Manimuthu : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 08.03.2011 and to take appropriate action on it as per law. For Petitioner : Mr.Shaji Chellan For Respondents1 to 3: Mr.K.Mahendran Special Government Pleader For Respondents 4&5 : Mr.K.Muthu Ganesa Pandian O R D E R ********** [Order of the Court was made BY K.SUGUNA, J] This Writ Petition is filed for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 08.03.2011. 2. However, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has submitted another representation on 29.04.2011 to the first respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. In view of the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner, the first respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29.04.2011 and pass orders in accordance with law, after providing a reasonable opportunity to respondents 4 and 5 and after following the procedure contemplated under the relevant Rules within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. According to the learned counsel for the fourth respondent, earlier, an allegation of theft of jewellery has been levelled as against the fourth respondent. After enquiry, the same was found to be false and for the second time, such an attempt has been made by the petitioner. 5. In view of the above, the first respondent or the authority concerned, to whom this exercise can be delegated by the first respondent, is at liberty to impose costs, in the event of the authority concerned coming to the conclusion that the allegation levelled as against the fourth respondent is false. Such enquiry has to be conducted either by the first respondent or by any authority to whom such exercise can be delegated by the first respondent within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (T&P) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S) To 1. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, 119, Uthamar Gangdhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 3. The Sub – Inspector of Police, Manamadurai Police Station, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District. + 1 cc to Mr.Shaji Chellan, Advocate, SR No.20058 + 1 cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR No.20053 ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD).No.5308 of 2011 24.06.2011 NB RJ/20.7.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/