IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1724 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2008 TTK Prestige Limited )..Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. )..Respondents ---- Mr.Khandeparkar h/for Warekar & Warekar for the applicant. Mrs.M.H.Mhatre APP for the respondent/State. ---- Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 11.08.2008. PC 1. This is an application for leave to appeal. On perusal of the impugned judgment and order, I find that the same has been passed on cogent and acceptable reasons. The defence of the accused was that he had a distributorship agreement and at the beginning of the agreement, he had deposited 22 cheques of Rs.18,000/- each. It was his case that there was no liability when the cheques were issued as security. The accused denied that any goods were delivered to him. As against this, complaint shows 33 invoices for different amounts showing total liability of Rs.5,64,156/-. These invoices covered the period 30.4.1999 to 31.4.2002. There was no delivery note which was produced. Even the : 2 : agreement of distributorship was not produced by the Complainant. It is in these circumstances, that the defence of the accused has been held to be probable. The Court has concluded that if indeed there was a liability of Rs.3,96,000/- which was the total amount of the cheques then the accused would have issued one cheque and not 22 cheques of Rs.18,000/- each. In my view, this is not a fit case to interfere in an appeal against acquittal. Hence, leave refused. Consequently, appeal papers to be filed. Application stands disposed off. (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J)