IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45684 of 2008 SUBHASH GUPTA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.12.2008 Heard Mr. A. K. Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Mehta, learned A.P.P. The informant was looted at gun point by being surrounded three criminals and was relieved of cash of Rs.12,000/- and his wrist watch. The villagers, on cries being raised by the informant, were attracted and on chase of the criminals, captured the present petitioner. The contention is that except the recovery of arms, there was nothing either money or the wrist watch. The further contention is that it is a case of false implication on being suspected as one of the miscreants while, as a matter of fact, the petitioner was simply moving on roads from one destination to another. The Court is not fascinated by the contention of the learned counsel inasmuch as there were three persons and there is no definite allegation that it was the petitioner who had relieved the informant either of money or the wrist watch. From the fact, the petitioner was found in possession of arms as an indicator of prima facie participation in the commission of the offence. The petition is dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )