IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 5686 of 2008. Decided on: 06.07.2010. K.L. Verma. …Petitioner. -Versus- Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, Advocate. For respondent No. 1. : Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. Respondent No. 2, already exparte. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): It is fairly submitted by the Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner at the threshold that as far as the prayer of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Deputy Tourism Development Officer (re-designated as Assistant Manager) is concerned, he is not entitled for the same in view of the correct interpretation of law. However, as far as case of the petitioner pertaining to recording of A.C.Rs. is concerned, the same is required to be re-looked into in view of the law laid down in Dev Dutt versus Union of India and others (2008) 8 Supreme Court Cases 725. 2. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner as far as recording of A.C.Rs. is concerned in view of the judgment cited above, within a period of eight weeks from today. Thereafter, the consequences shall ensue. The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 06, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.