..,.^^^^ kv^ Petitioner Applicant HiGH.CQURT OF CHHA.TTISOARH AT' BILASPUR.. Wnt Petitson (Art.227) F«o.SS34_oi2010 Nand Kishore Halwai S/o Shrl Gokui Prasad Halwai, aged about-38 years, R/o.Ward No,7, Bus Stand Pandariya DJ-stt.Kabirdham (C.G.) ResRondents Non-appSscants 2. 3. Versus Jivarakhan Gupta S/o Shri Kamal Narayan Gupta, aged about —y©ars, R/oWard No.15, BusStand Pandariya Distt.Kabirciham (C.G.) Board of Revenue, Bllaspur (Clrcult Court, Ras'pur) C.G. AdditionaE Colioctor, Dlstl.KabJrdham (C.G.) Kabirdham, 4. TahsiSdar, Pandariys Distt.Kabirdham (Wrst Petjtion ursder Artide 227 ofthe Constitutlon of India) ^ Mr.M.K.Sinha ancj Mr.Santosh Bharst, counsel forthe petltioner. Mr.Bharat Rajput, counsei for respondent No.1. IVSr.Sumit Jhanwar, Pane! Lawyer for rsspondents No.3 and 4/Stat®. (SB: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) QRDER (Passedon 14-7-2011) 1. By thss petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India ths petitioner has challenged the logallty and propriety ofthe order dated 22/1/2010 (Annexure P/1) passed by ths Board of Revsnue In Revenue Cass No.RN/08/R/A" 70/360/2008, affirnnjng the order datsd 24.8.2009 (Annsxurs P/7) passed by tho Additionai Coilector, Kablrdham §n Rovenue Revsslon Case No.25A"70, whereby footh the Courts authorities have rsversed the order dated 17.2.2009 passed by the Tahsildar, by whlch the Tahslldar has directed to produce copies of B1. map, khasra panchshala and demarcatlon rsport to respondent No.1. 2. 'Appllcation undor Section 250 of the C.G, Land Revenue Code, 1859 was pendlng befors the Tahsiidar, in which ths Tahslldar has dsrected to produce the aforosaid documents. ,^^ ^. •t;;', .' 3 "shs^^ -^- 3. yirtuasly it is the duty of the partles to produce the documents In support thelr cialm. Ths Courts are not rQqulred to produce the documents. The Courts may act and pass th@ ordor in the absence of documonts at the risk of the parties. 4. in case of proceedings undor Soction 250 of the C.G. Land Revenuo Code, tho Tahslidar Is required to moko an Inqulry and pass appropriate order By passlng such order, the Tahssidsr has sxcseded the jurisdictlon which has bsen rectifisd by the Courts authoritiss. i do not flnd any substance in the present petjtion. 5. •7he petition being dovoid of merit is llable to bo dismlssod and It is hereby dls'mlssed, No ordor as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^