.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.157 OF 2008 Farid Ahmed Tayyab Tanasha. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .. Mr.R.M.Tufad, Adv. and Mr.Y.K.Dullar, Adv. for the Petitioner. Mr.A.S.Gadkari, APP, for the State. .. CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND CORAM : S.B.MHASE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 11, 2008. DATED : FEBRUARY 11, 2008. DATED : FEBRUARY 11, 2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the order dated 17th July, 2007 passed in Misc.Application No.179 of 2007 in MCOC Special Case No.25 of 2005 is not under challenge in this Petition. Therefore he further states that the prayer clause (b) in the Petition is not being pressed. Leave to amend is granted. The learned Counsel for the petitioner is, therefore, directed to immediately amend the Petition accordingly. .{2}. 3. The Petition therefore only survives in respect of prayer clause (c). The learned Counsel ultimately states that he may be allowed to withdraw the Petition with a liberty to approach the MCOC Court. The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with such a liberty and is disposed of as such. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [S.B.MHASE,J.]