s^ HSGnCOuRT OF CHHATTiSGARH. BiLASpuR PETmGNERS :r'i '^e W.P.(C)No. 3878/2010 Vyay iKhatik, S/o Anand Rao, Aged about 30 years, R/o Ward No.2, Mission Ward, Near Rest House, Tiida-Neora, District,Raipur (C.G.) Harak Yadu, S/o Mahetru Yadu, Agedj about 32 years, R/o Purani Basti, Tiida Ward No.4, Tiida-Neora, District Raipur (C.G.). Rakesh Kumar Yaday S/o. Dwarika Prassid Yadav, Aged about 25 years, R/o Ihdira Chowk Purani Basti, Tifda, WarQ' No.2, Tiida-Neora, Distrjct, Ralpur (C.G.) Kuieshwar Prasad Verrna S/o Mahesh Prasad Verma. Aged about 44 years, R/o Beside New irriigation Colony Sai Nagar, Tuisi-Neora District (Raipur) (C.G^ IVianoj Kumar Chandei S/u Santu Ram Chandel Aged abaut 28 years, R/o Ward No. 5, Baigsngadgar Tiiak, Tilda- Neora,District Raipur (C.G.) A. S^ema iViurti W/o K. Krishna iviurti Aged about 28 years, R/o Ward No. 3, Mission Colony Tilda, Post Neora, District Ralpur (C.G.). Zahir Beg, S/oTvluneer Beg, Aged about 38 years, R/o Goverdhan Nagar Ward 13, Near Kabrlstan, Neora , D'istrict- Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through: Nagriya Prashashan IVIunicipal Corporation, D.K.S.Bhavvan,Raipur(C.G.5 The Nagar Paiika Parishad, Chjef Munlcipai Qfficer, Tiida Nevra, Dlstrsct Raipur(C.G.) WRITPETmONUNDERAFmCL^ ApRearance: . Mr. Vivek Rathore, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the Stafe. !VSs. Tripti Dewangan, Advocate appears on beha'ifof Mr. A.S. Kachhawaha, Advocate for respondent No.2. '-^ 1 J.< 's^/ ~y- W.P. (0 No. 3878/2010 ORAL ORDER (04.04.2011) SUNSL KUMAR SSNHA.J. Heard. The petltioners are Chicken Shop Keepers of Tiida-Neora, Distriet Raipur. They have fiied tnls writ petition chaiienging the notice dated 19.07.10 issued by Chlef Municipai Officer of respondent No.2. It was contended in the notice that t'ne petitioners shoulu stop their chicken shops In the area concemed within 7 days from the date of reeeipt of the impugned noticedated 19.07.10 and they shoui,d fiie appiication for aiiotrnent of the shops in Budhwari Market of the said Municipal Area, faiiing which, the Nagar Panchayatshail take action under Section 260 of the Chhattisgarh Municipalities Act, 1961. After receiving t'ne said notlce, this writ petition was fiiedon 26.07.10 and notices were issued, however, no interim order vyas granted in favour of the petitloners in the writ petition. Mr. Rathore submits that since the period of notices has aiready eiapsed and no further action is now being proposed after the said period, he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petjtion wlfh iibertyto fiie an other writ petition, ifsuch an exigency arises in future. Permisslongranted. Accurdingly, the writ petltlon is disposed of as vvithdiavyn vy-ith the ^foresaid liberty granted in favour ofthepetitioners. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge rahuS