WRI 1‘ Cf‘URT 9F CEHATTISGARH AT BYLASPUR S E ' Hb\ BLE JLSTICE SHRI SATISH K. AgVIHQ FRI EPETYHQB 30. 366.3 ai 2604 Yagas}: Kama: Gupia? aggd abeut 20 ways; Sic. late Shri Jahani Prasad Gupia, R/O. Viii 65 EOSE Saragaon (Via Banniclih) Disft, Janjgir-Chamga (Chhattisgarm 0f Chhamsgarhg through: ' Sea‘etam Genslai Administfatim} Ds§ar€m0na Eiavtmaw, DKS Bhawan R0. ami Emit Ralpm (C G) . 2) District Edusaiion Gfiicer, Janjgir, Disft, Jagligir-Champa (CG) 3) Biock Educai’mn Of‘Ecer, Eamnidih: Disit. Jagjgir-Champa (CG) 4) State of Macihya pradesh though: Qpcretan Gama} Admmgm 1011 Depa, Maauaiaygx Vailatgl; %11awa13, Bhopal, (MP3; 5) Umor; ofhldia. thmugh: Secretary Stata ‘ Rearaamsatieg. Parliamam Egusea Naw DE‘hx WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 726/22 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF ENDIA PETITEGNER RESPQNBENTS VERSUS : 1) [Stata Prasant: Mr. BRGhGSh, Advocata f0? tha pati:immr._ Miss Sanita Jam, Panel Lawyer far the Siate/respendems E to 3 My S K Beriwal, Stamiintr Cou'ma‘ for the mmmldam m 5 {Passed an 2" lda" GfAprii, 2687) , By this netitim tnva petitions: web a Wm 0f mandamus d116ctmg ma xespondems to consxder me case of ma netltionear tar campassmnat appomimem. The petmonsr flake; 136616 for xsSLLance 0f a, Wm OI. certimaii quashinv the pdicyfcii‘chia: dated 10.06.2003 (Annexure P/1) “mi 2% 07 20m (@geme /2), § The‘fathar of the petitianaz; While woikjng as Head MaSEer in the Govt. Boys Primary Schoei, GwER Sargaona died {m 11.05.1991 111 hamass. a 17" ‘1“. ”fhs patiiimmr has mack: an appligatim: 0:1 14:08:2903 to tiag mspmdsnt no. 2, District Educafdon Officer, Janjgir, District Janjgif—Champa it appsars that ihé petitioner mada applicatioa after havmg passed thé” Highar Smoacialy Schooi Cgrtiiicatg Exammatioa in Mamh, 2002 and no speciiic date was stateé eiiher ii} the pleadings 01‘ £21 ‘iha argumams asta when he has ati‘ained majoyiiy, It agpeaw that Vidf: order dated 10.06.2003, iesued by the Under Secretary to the Gevemmen‘t of Chhaitisgai‘hi Geeeral Adminisiratieii Department; certam aew allies we;‘e framed fer compassieeate appoimmem (Annexare 13/1} ané which was subsequemly ameladed m1, 23012003 (Amexure PfZ), The pet‘iiiener has iiied this wzii petition statiiag that theeireular/peiicy daied 10,06,200?) {Agnexuz‘e P/l) am 23.072003 (Amexure 13/2} is mn'easonabie, discrimmatory and not in emsename with the spirit (3f the Coestkutian of Iedia. The policy, in' normal eitcumstanees may net V be interfered with [by the High Court, except in the case 0f being unconstitutionai, arbitrary and unreasonable. This pohcy dated 10.06.2003 came into consideration before this Court in several eccasiens and this Court has directed to eorrsider the ”eases in accordance with law. Thus the prayer with regard te quashing of the policy is rej eetedl It is well settled that compassroraate apeolhtmeht is not in aeeordaace with the eenstitutionalseheme of edaploymeht ahd is a back-door entry. The‘father of’the petitioner died oi? ll.05,l§95 arid the petitioner has applied for, eomhassionate apiioihtmeht l4.08.2003. V There is coneiderabie delay of 8 years on the part of the petitioner for seeking compassionate appointment. .f The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sitate of J&K and others Vs, [Sajad Ahmed Mir, (2006) 5 SCC 766, inl‘para 11 regarding deiay in seeking C” . ; v l compassionate appointment held as der: 1 “Once ii is provsd mat iasyita of the daath of iha breadwinner, the family survived and substantiai pericd is even there is n0 11ewssity to say “good-bye” to the aorma} rule of appaimment and to Show favour to one at the cost of the interest of severai others ignoring the mandate efArtide 14 ofthe Genetitutien.“ Moreever, it is mw weii gamed that appoinimem on compassioeate gmimd cannot be claimed as a matte? of right, It is thus clear from the decision eited above thai the petitioner oatinot ' glaim compassionate appointment by virtue of a right of inheritance.‘ Even othei‘wise, the considerable delay 0f 8 veers 0n the part of the petitioner for seeking compassionate appointment is unsuetainabie as heine unexniained, §otthe reasons stated hereinabovea this petition deserves to be and iS ’Sd/- samh K. Awihom Judge accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs, /