IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.9376 of 2008. Decided on: 22.12.2010. Dinesh Kumar. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Another. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner. : Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S.Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) It is not disputed that the present lis is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Ram Lal Sharma and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, C.W.P (T) No. 8451 of 2008. 2. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to take a decision in view of the principles laid down in the judgment cited hereinabove within a period of two months after the production of copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 22, 2010. (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No.