IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4736 of 2010 DR.TEJ NARAIN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 19.05.2011 The Court fails to understand as to what kind of right the petitioner has asserted for his appointment as a doctor. A written test for contractual appointment was conducted in the year 2008 itself. If the petitioner did not make it to select the list/ merit list then there is no mechanism this court can evolve to offer employment to the petitioner merely because he was initially appointed under some scheme way back in the year 1981 and had some experience of the nature of responsibility. It is certified that is a roving kind of writ without any right in favour of the petitioner having emerged from the pleadings and evidence. The writ is dismissed. Namita ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)