:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVN.APPLICATION NO.252 OF 2003 Mrs. Zubeda G. Badami ... Applicant versus Mrs. Molly K. Damania & anr. ... Respondents ... Mr.Samir Vaidya, for the Applicant. Mr.K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondent State. Respondent No.1 present in person. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 27th April 2005 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the parties. It is stated that the parties have amicably resolved their disputes. The Applicant has paid the requisite amount to the Respondent No.1 as per the said agreement. Respondent No.1 is personally present in Court and states that she is content with the payment of Rs.35,000/- made :2: by the Applicant, which amount has been deposited in this Court. Respondent No.1 prays that she may be permitted to withdraw the said amount of Rs.35,000/- deposited by the Applicant in this Court. Insofar as the fine amount is concerned, Counsel for the Applicant states that the said amount has already been paid before the lower Court. . Accepting the above position, stated by the parties, the revision application is allowed to the extent of setting aside the sentence imposed by the lower Court as has been confirmed by the appellate Court. Instead, the same is reduced to sentence already undergone by the Applicant. Accordingly, this application is disposed of on the above terms. Consent terms tendered by the parties, taken on record. Respondent No.1 is permitted to withdraw amount of Rs.35,000/- deposited in this Court by the Applicant. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)