<3T .--»y' o i^rf""'.^, -<^.'.'^•^c^y-f' ^p./.a- '^"|L--.1.:(' G^-' '^jNI1'!! I" RFS.lffU's IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.} W.P.(C) No. ^'^&^ of 2010 fe p^ PETITIONER Smt. Amita Bai aged about 60 years, W/o Chain Lal Kasar, R/o Kota Colony, B-57, Raipur Disrt. Raipur (C.G. ) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :£-.• ;1. Regional Transport Authority, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RT-; m' Petitioner Respondents HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 3464 of 2010 Smt. Amita Bai Versus Regional Transport Authority & Another WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble IVIr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri Santosh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on 15th day of July, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the application was on 08/08/2010 for change of timing of regular permit No. 101/07 on the route Durg to Raipur. No action has been taken on the said application till date. He further submits that the petitioner has filed another application on 02/07/2010 which is still pending Gonsideration, but till date no action has been taken, Learned counsel prays that the respondent authorities may be directed to consider and decide the pending application of the petitioner within a reasonable time and pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Shri Thakur, legrned Panel Lawyer submits that if no action has been taken on the application of the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a reasonable time. In view offoregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing sun/ives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Arun