IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.51843 of 2008 Dilip Paswan, son of Taulat Rai @ Thulo Paswan, Resident of village Gandhinagar, P.S. Kadwa, District Katihar .. Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .. Opposite Party **** /2/ 20.03.2009 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. After eighteen years of marriage complaint case bearing C.A. Case No. 2434 of 2007 has filed by the wife/complainant alleging offence under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations are false and fabricated. The petitioner was living with his wife/complainant, but, subsequently complainant wants that petitioner should live with her at her parents place. This is the issue on which the parties are not in agreement and the complaint case has been filed. 3. Considering the facts, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner, Dilip Paswan, is allowed. He is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of his surrender before the Court concerned within four 2 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with the aforementioned case to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )