1 ca3576.07 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3576 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 337 OF 2007 [The State of Mah. vs. M/s N.R. Penta and sons, Ahmednagar] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. N.R. Shaikh, A.G.P.for applicant. Mr. A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent sole. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 9TH NOVEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned A.G.P. for the applicant and learned Counsel for the respondent. Learned Counsel for the respondent vehemently opposed the application for condonation of delay and submitted that, delay is not properly explained. 2. Upon hearing the Counsel for the 2 ca3576.07 parties and upon perusal of the contents of the application, it appears that delay in filing the second appeal is unintentional. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has taken a view that, in the matter filed by the Public Body or Government, liberal approach is required to be adopted while considering the prayer for condonation of delay. 3. In that view of the matter, Civil Application for condonation of delay is allowed and stands disposed of. . Second Appeal to be placed for admission on 24-11-2011. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/NOV11