IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2625 OF 2009 Between: Thallapalli Sathaiah … Petitioner/Respondent/Plaintiff AND 1. N. Lachamma 2. Chainthalathadem 3. Chinthalathadem Shanker … Respondents/Petitioners)/Defendants The Court made the following : ORDER: The revision, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order and decree, dated 28.08.2006, in I.A.No.923 of 2006 in O.S.No.100 of 2002, on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar, whereunder and whereby, the petition, under Section 45 read with 72 of the Indian Evidence Act, to send the registered sale deed bearing Document No.1091 of 1994, dated 01.10.1994 along with the thumb impression of the petitioner/defendant No.1 to the Forensic Science Laboratory, Hyderabad, for comparison was allowed. Challenging the same, this civil revision petition is filed. 2. Heard both sides. 3. Now it is brought to the notice of this Court that in pursuance of the said order, the disputed document i.e., registered sale deed bearing Document No.1091 of 1994, dated 01.10.1994 along with the thumb impression of the petitioner/defendant No.1 have been sent for comparison to the Forensic Science Laboratory, Hyderabad, and the report has been given by the expert. Therefore, cause in this case does not survive. 4. Hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ (K.C.BHANU, J) Dated: 11th September, 2009. KL