CRM-M No. 20076 of 2011 **** Rameshwar and others v. State of Haryana Present: Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Preeti Choudhary, AAG, Haryana. Mr. , Advocate for the complainant. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 527 dated 15.06.2010 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Karnal, District Karnal. On 11.07.2011 it had been pointed out that petitioner No.3 had since been arrested and the petition qua him had been rendered infructuous. Learned AAG, on instructions from ASI Pritam Lal, has stated that as per the report of the Forensic Science Laboratory it is a clear case where forgery has taken place. Learned counsel for the complainant has also argued that the custodial interrogation of all the petitioners would be required to unearth this conspiracy. It is admitted that it is a dispute between first cousins. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further stated that land in dispute is in the possession of the complainants. As regards the argument of learned counsel for the complainants once the main accused viz. petitioner No.3 is already in custody, in my opinion the custodial interrogation of petitioners No.1 and 2 would not be required. Let them appear before the investigating officer on 08.08.2011 between 10.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. and on any other date on which CRM-M No. 20076 of 2011 -2- their presence would be required by the investigating officer. On their appearance the investigating officer the investigating officer shall release them on bail to his satisfaction, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE July 28, 2011 sunita