ll APPLICANT HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR Cr. Rev. No. (PR) 1232/08 ^.^^<.v. ^^^}t5-e Smt. Hemlata Minj W/o Mohar Sai, aged 41 years, R/o ViUage Gudlu (Mahadeodand), P.S. Bageecha, Distt. Jashpur. VERSUS NOH-APPLICANT. Sanjay Siugh S/o K. Chandraa, aged about 28 years R/o Village- Mahadeodaad, Tah. Bageecha, Distt. Jashpur(C,G.), 5?EVISION UNDER SECTIOM 397 & 401 OF CRIMINAL PRQCBDURE^ODE, (SB :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present: Shri B.R. Nikunj, Advocate for fhe appUcaiit. None for fhe non-applicant ORDBR (Passed on Ist ofApril- 2008) 1. The matter is listed for orders on default which is not removed by fhe applicant. 2. Leamed Counsel for the applicant wants to argue on <^ adniission. 3. Heard. 4. This petition is directed against the order dated 02/11/2007 passed by the Sessions Judge, Jashpur m M.J.C. No.15/06. 5. Order impugned perused. 6. By fhe order impugned, after taktng in to consideration the raaterial avallable on record and holding that no spedfic 2- !-<«•?'?' s' ground for canceUation of grant of baU has been establlshed by the applicant. Leamed Sessions Judge, Jashpur has rejected the application, it reveals from fhe order impugned an3 copy of the application for canceUation of bail, fhat no Spedfic allegation has been made only vague-allegation has been made which are not sufflcient for cancellation fhe order of bail. 7. On careful examination, I do not flnd any iilegality or mfirmity in fhe drder impugned. Consequently, petition is dismissed atthe stage ofadmission. ; Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge