IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.531 of 2010 1. VIJAY SINGH 2. Arun Singh Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 5/ 02.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Informant is sole witness of the incident that is taken to favour and doubt the prosecution case while rivalry are there in between the parties. At the instance of the petitioners, it is said that final form was submitted in the year 1995 exonerating them from the liability finding no corroboration of the allegation, while it is submitted on behalf of the prosecution that two of the F.I.R. witnesses including one inquest witness was killed in course of investigation and investigating agency was entrusted in recording the statement of defence witness. A single witness is sufficient for conviction even. However, cognizance is taken in the case on the material found in the case diary which in my view also is not justified for any relief to petitioners. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. Shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)