I ^^\'^foxs BE?QRE.'IHE ,H.B» STM'E7^Saiyi.BIS'I'K.AI'I'VE : TRIBHNAL ^, 'JKSl&.SKSB.^ O .&.: .H^ri::2-^Z^/95;: APPLICANT »,, :RaJ,.Kumar Yadsv, ;;S/o<,Shrl,, ,,|!'.,,'-.;i:::|: Khorbahara Ram Yaday',: .aged:,:•SS^^Eg;^^ ',HlndjL,Stenography: Instsr'uetora . iBtejai 3:<T.3:;«':Kariya.Sl-ij.ksha'.E>arlsarai»J:Kj...::;:^||, &nblKapur .Bis'bt- , Sargu;3a,:HP,>:"^;g •;"';! fS-. NON APBaiCANTS. -Versus- ^3;« . a-tate of H«P« •fefarougfa SeGrefeairYj^ TFa-Bai Bevelopmen'fi.Bepartmeriti: ;';,'11;3 yatIaKhbhswan,"B]iQpal, EEP. . ' :^. ;^: %» eomnissioner',. 33Fiba£''Be'v'eI®prae'n|; Bepartment, :•: Bho@al,, MP^ ,-• , '. '';:': ^1 S< Dy. Canmj.sBloner. 'I%iba3;l':De-yeloE1 menfc Bllaspur!, Disfet- &®laspyr,;;MEjj,i 4:1» Superlntendent,' Womens ;!I'»T'a'3E»:: Kanya SJ.Xsha ; Earlsara,, ;.ami:ji^sapHiE" B3-s;t:t;-;:.Sacguja, MP;.'.:^ :'. ':l^'i.; APPaieATrON,U/S»':;13'.<lgS3M|iaE8B^iES^^ZVS^:'lS^|] 81 ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH LBILASPUR Writ Pctition (S) No. 1273 of2005 Petitioner Raj Kumar Yadav Versus Respondente The State of M. P. (now CUhattisgarh) & ofhers '(SB: Htm'ble Shri Satfcsh K. ^mhotri J.) None fiir thc petitioner., Slui N. N. Roy and Shri A. V. Shridhar, Paael Lawyers for thc icspondente/State. ORDBRhaan ( Passed on fhis 13A dayofNcwcniber,i2009 ) 1. The matter is callcd for hcariag twlce. On bofh. the occasions none appcars nor any representation.is inadc on behalf of fhe petitioncr. The petittoner may notbe mtcrested ia pasosecuting fhe ruatter. 2. In vicw offhe foregoing, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. A copy offhis oxder shall be sent to the petitioner forfhwifh. Thakur