IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONS No.1888 and 1891 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? @ MANGALBHAI RAIJIBHAI PATEL Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 1888 of 2001 MR BS PATEL for Petitioner No. 1 MRS RANJAN B PATEL for Petitioner No. 1 MS MANISHA LAVKUMAR, Ld. AGP for Respondent No. 1-2 MR MUKESH R SHAH for Respondent No. 3 1. Special Civil Application No. 1891 of 2001 MR BS PATEL for Petitioner No. 1 MRS RANJAN B PATEL for Petitioner No. 1 MR HM SOMPURA, Ld. AGP for Respondent No. 1-2 MR MUKESH R SHAH for Respondent No. 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL Date of decision: 27/08/2002 COMMON ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. The learned Counsel, Mr.B.S.Patel appearing for the petitioners, states that the petitioners have approached the Collector and the competent authority under the Works of Defence Act in the subject matter of these petitions, with a view to resort to alternative remedy available under the said Act, Mr.Patel seeks permission to withdraw these petitions. Permission granted. Rejected as withdrawn. Rule discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. The petitioners may approach to the Collector for expeditious disposal of the said proceedings. Direct service permitted. 27-8-2002 (Jayant Patel, J.) vinod