Civil Revision No. 254 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 254 of 2008 Date of Decision: February 16, 2010 Ashok Kumar ...... Petitioner Versus Ranjit Singh and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.B.s.Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Kanwal Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Arun Palli, Senior Advocate for the respondents. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against an order refusing to implead one Rajinder Kaur as a defendant. Learned trial court has noticed that as per the allegations of the petitioner, during the pendency of the suit the defendant No.1 sold the property to the wife of defendant No.3 but as per the trial Court the petitioner was at liberty to file a fresh suit against the said Rajinder Kaur. Learned counsel has argued that a perusal of the zimni order clearly reveals that the respondents are entering into various transactions only to defeat the injunction order. In my opinion even if this be so yet no prejudice would be Civil Revision No. 254 of 2008 2 caused to the petitioner if the course suggested by the learned trial Court viz. filing fresh suit is adopted. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that that would multiply the litigation and the petitioner would have to lead evidence on the same issues time and again. He, however, states that apart from that the petitioner would have no objection to file a fresh suit. In my opinion this grievance of the petitioner can be redressed by stating that any suit which is filed by the petitioner against the said Rajinder Kaur would be decided along with the instant suit. In this view of the matter no interference is called for in the order of the learned trial court. With this clarification the revision petition is disposed of. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE February 16, 2010 sunita