HIGHCOIJRTOFCIIHATTISGAfiHATBILASPUR MJG^ No.l]l<bf^Q«8 @ APKLTCANTS ^ETinQNERS NON- APPLICANTS l.Harish Rao agedabc^^3^^^^ Loco Kholi Near Bock No. 64/1, Tahsil an<l District Bilaspur(CG). 2.Yogesh Gupta, aged 38 S/o Panna Lal Gupta, R/o Near Mariu Mai Mandir, Tahsil & ©istnctBila^nir (CG). 3. S. Sarwar Aged about 45 years, |S/b Khalil, R^ Tarbahm-, Near Masih Clihaya Bilaspw (CG). .••:1 .l.'..r 4. Shekhar Raoa^d,alxmt45 year^ Para Near SAntoshi Mandir Chowk, BUaspur Tafasil and DistrictBaaspur(CG), | 5. Sunil Kimiar KOs^^ agpd aboirt 44 years R^ PancAr^ti RaJlddsxM^ Nagar, Gram Mopk^ JTahsil & District Bilaspur (CG). .. 1,: :.''"••.: -••'^ 6/M. Shriniwasu aged about 45 yeai^ S/o M.S.N. Murty R/o Line N0. 14/222, Vinoba Nagai^ TahsU and District Bilaspur(CG). | VERSUS | -- : /-: 1.Union of India, tiirough Secretary, Govenunent of India, New',DeIhi.:.'' ; '•^/,' 2. General Mdnag^r, SEGRBilaspuTlZone Bilaspur (CG^ 3. Sr. Divisional Pensonal Gfficer,[ SEC Railway, Bilaspur ,^ : ../•:v <<^-':' '^' :< •11: '-^ (APPUCATION FOR RESTORATION QF W.P. (S)Nb.|4114/2007) (^B; Hon'MeNbr. &UishK. AfiiuhotriJJ.) J. Present : Shn B^. Badgayan, ^4vo<^l^ Shri D.R. Sharma, Semc^ Advocate^^^w Advocate fbr the responderrt^ ORALORDER (Passed on 18UI ofFebruary, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel jfor tihe applicants submits thatj the counsel fbr fhe petitioners c<mM not appear on a^ourrt ofbonafide mistake, thercfbre, W.P. ••* ' • - (S) No. 4114/2007, v^ieh was dismissed on 28.01.2008, be restoredto its file. 2. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P. (S) No. 41 14/2007 be restored to the originalfile. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record of fhe original petitkMd and Ifae same be listed j&>r hearing- 4. Inviewoffheabove^applicati<Mi^f^ ^ahu SatishK.Agnihotri