IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (C-482) No. 630 Of 2009 1. Smt. Archana Garg w/o Shri Vijay Kumar Garg D/O Late Ashok Kumar Garg R/O Village Tallapur P.S Mujjafarabad District Saharanpur (U.P) 2. Shri Pankaj Garg S/O Late Ashok Garg R/O Village Tallapur P.S Mujjafarabad District Saharanpur (U.P) 3. Shri Manoj Kumar S/O Prem Chand Gupta R/O Mayur Vihar Near Saundhi Nursing Home P.S Kotwali, Jwalapur Haridwar, (U.K) 4. Shri Ravindra Kumar S/O Sadhu Ram R/O Chilkana Chungi P.S Purani Mandi District Saharanpur (U.P) ……………………..Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand Through DGC(criminal) District Haridwar. 2. Vijay Kumar Garg S/O Pradeep Garg R/O 78 Chopta, Kankhal P.S Kankhal District Haridwar. …………..Complainant/Respondents Smt Neetu Singh, Advocate, present for the petitioners Smt. Mamta Bisht A.G.A with Shri M.A.Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State. Shri Bhewanesh Joshi, Advocate, present for respondent no2/complainant 2 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. (2) By means of this petition, moved under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioners have sought quashing of the summoning order dated 27.07.2009, passed by Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, in Criminal Case no 2126 of 2009, relating to offences punishable under section 420, 494, 495, 120B I.P.C. (3) Petitioner no. 1 Archana Garg (wife) and respondent no.2 Vijay Kumar Garg (husband) have entered into compromise which is filed today before this court as Annexure 1 to the affidavit filed with the compromise application. The parties to the matrimony have agreed to withdraw all the criminal cases pending against each other. The compromise is verified by petitioner no.1 Archana Garg and respondent no.2 Vijay Kumar Garg who are present in person in the court, identified by their counsel. (4) In view of the principle of law laid down in B.S.Joshi vs. State of Haryana (2003) 4 SCC page 675, this petition moved under section 482 of Cr.P.C, deserves to be allowed, as the parties to the matrimony have entered into compromise. (5) The petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C is allowed. The proceedings of criminal case no 2126 of 2009, Vijay Kumar 3 Garg vs. Archana Garg and others relating to offences punishable under section 420, 494, 495, 120B I.P.C, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, are hereby quashed. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt.27.4.2010 N.P