IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. Petition No.M-23495 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision:-7.10.2010 Rattan Kumar Bansal son of Onkar Nath ...Petitioner Versus Smt.Chanchal Bansal w/o Puneet Bansal ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present:- Mr.J.S.Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Pritam Saini, Advocate for the respondent. M ehinder S ingh S ullar , J. (Oral) At the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during the pendency of the instant petition, the parties have compromised the matter. They have already filed a separate petition for quashing the impugned complaint and summoning order on the basis of compromise. 2. In this view of the matter, the present petition becomes infructuous, which is hereby dismissed as such. 3. Needless to say that if the impugned complaint and summoning order are not quashed in the separate petition on the basis of compromise, the petitioner would be at liberty to file a fresh petition for challenging the same on merits. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) 7.10.2010 Judge AS