IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32932 of 2010 ZAINUDDIN, SON OF LATE MADHAR ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KAKRAMARI, POLICE STATION PAHARKATTA, DISTRICT-KISHANGANJ. …..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kumar (Adv.) For the State : APP. ----------- 04/ 03.11.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. Earlier prayer for bail of this petitioner was rejected on 26.03.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 42372 of 2008 considering the allegation that the accused persons including this petitioner were involved in commission of murder of the informant’s wife. Another circumstance, which was considered at the time of passage of earlier order was that one co-accused Bachan has been convicted by the trial court. Submission is that seven out of eight witnesses in the trial of the petitioner have been examined and only the informant is to be examined. None of the examined witnesses have supported any part of the allegation. Initially, the petitioner was absconder and, therefore, his trial has to be separated. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the above 2 named petitioner is again rejected. However, the court below is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the trial is not concluded within stipulated period then the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the court below. kksinha/- (Shyam kishore Sharma, J.)