IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH OCTOBER 2008 / 7TH KARTHIKA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1373 of 2008(S) ------------------------------- (AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.20210/2008 Dated 04/07/2008) PETITIONER/IST PETITIONER: ----------------------------------- SAKKIR.P.B., S/O.BAVA, AGED 38, SELECTION GRADE ASSISTANT, SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, KALADY. BY ADV. SMT.P.V.ASHA RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------- 1. DR.S.PREMJITH, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) REGISTRAR, SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, KALADY, ERNAKULAM. 2. DR.K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) VICE CHANCELLOR, SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, KALADY, ERNAKULAM. R1 AND R2 ADV. SRI.P.K.VIJAYAMOHANAN,SC,SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T. SANKARAN, J. ...................................................... CONTEMPT CASE (C) No. 1373 OF 2008 ....................................................... Dated this the 29th October, 2008 J U D G M E N T As per the judgment dated 04.07.2008, the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent that the matter will be placed before the Syndicate at the earliest opportunity and at any rate, within a period of two months, was recorded. The Contempt Case is filed alleging that there is deliberate and wilful disobedience of the judgment passed by this Court since the matter was not placed before the Syndicate within the time stipulated. 2. Learned Standing Counsel, on instruction, submits that the matter was placed before the Syndicate in its meeting held on 30.08.2008. It is also submitted that when the item was taken up for consideration, some of the members of the Syndicate wanted a detailed discussion in the matter. Learned Standing Counsel further submits that the matter will be considered shortly and that the Contempt Case is not maintainable. 3. Since the matter has been placed before the Syndicate, technically speaking, the judgment has been complied with. The CONTEMPT CASE (C) No. 1373 OF 2008 2 grievance of the petitioner is that the judgment has not been complied with in its true spirit. The learned Standing Counsel submits that the Syndicate will duly consider the matter. In the facts and circumstances, the Contempt Case is closed with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate measures at the appropriate stage. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE. lk