IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2008 / 7TH BHADRA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 4058 of 2007() ------------------------------ CRA.368/2005 of III ADDL. SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC), FAST TRACK COURT-I, THRISSUR ST.609/2001 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-II, THRISSUR .................... REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED ----------------------------------------------------------------- V.S.I.NAZAR, S/O.SULAIMAN, VAZHAPPILLY HOUSE, PARUTHIPPARA, KUMARANELLORE P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT & STATE ------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ICDS LTD. REGIONAL OFFICE, 9/401, MISSION QUARTERS JUNCTION, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER BALAKRISHNAN, S/O.KRISHNA SHENAI, CHENNAMANGALAM, PARAVUR. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. BY ADV. SRI. C.M. NAZER, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.P.SHRIHARI FOR R1 SMT.P.VANI FOR R1 THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29.08.2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.R.P.NO. 4058/2007 : 2 : ORDER ON Crl.M.A. NO. 11913/2007 IN CRL.R.P.NO. 4058/2007 DISMISSED 29.08.2008 sd/- V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. V. RAMKUMAR, J. ........................................... Crl.R.P. No. 4058 of 2007 ........................................... Dated this the 29th day of August, 2008. ORDER The accused in ST. No. 609 of 2001 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Thrissur for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the courts below. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter. Crl.M.A.No. 9092 of 2008 has been filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 seeking permission to record the composition entered into between the revision petitioner and the complainant. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. In the light of this development, the aforementioned composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner within the meaning of Sec. 320 (8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P. is disposed of as above. Dated this the 29th day of August, 2008. V. RAMKUMAR,JUDGE. rv