BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eleventh day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.9969 of 2011 CHANDARA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4 Vs STATE REP BY' THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION RAMANATHAPURAM CRIME NO.2/2011 ...RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.R.KANNAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAI PANDI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The Petitioner is the fourth accused in Crime No.2 of 2011. The offences alleged against her are under Sections 366(A) and 376 IPC and under Section 3,4,5,6 of I.T(P)Act 1956. Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, she is before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2.It is an unfortuante case where the victim girl, who is hardly aged 17 years, had earlier been given in marrigae to her uncle's son. Some time after the marriage, she deserted her husband and went elsewhere in search of a job. While she was working in a company, the petitioner and other accused came into contact with her. They decided to push her to flesh trade. According to the case of prosecution, the present petitioner, who is the fourth accused in this case, sold the de-facto complainant, a minor victim girl, to A5 and A6 for the purpose of flesh trade. Thus, the victim girl was illegally detained for several days and pushed into flesh trade. The greed of the petitioner for money at the cost of the modesty of a woman cannot be viewed lightly. The offence is so heinous in nature, which no ordinary man can tolerate. Having regard to the gravity of the offence, I am of the view that the petitioner deserves to be dealt with ironhand. In such view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. sd/- 11/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 2.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION RAMANATHAPURAM rl/3c – 14.10.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9969 of 2011 Date :11/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/