IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 58 of 2006 (M/B) H.N. Saraswat S/o Late Sri P.N. Saraswat, R/o 178 Avas Vikas, Bhotia Parao, Haldwani, District Nainital. ………… Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, 2. Station Officer, PS Haldwani, Nainital. 3. D.C. Pandey, Senior Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda, Haldwani, Nainital. …….. Respondents Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Gaurav Joshi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate for respondent No. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.K. Sharma, Government Advocate for respondents Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Gaurav Joshi, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate for respondent No. 3. 2. Mr. D.K. Sharma, the learned Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by petitioner seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him has, now, become infructuous, as the Police, after the completion of the investigation, has submitted final report before the concerning Magistrate. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 20.06.2006 20.06.2006 A