IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.66 of 2009 DIP NARAYAN SINGH Versus INDU DEVI ----------- 2 16.01.2009 Heard Mr. Tara Kant Jha, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, when the defendant No.1 had died during the preparation of preliminary decree and the land in question was conveyed by him prior to his death in favour of the intervenor-opposite party the approach of the Court below in allowing impleadment of such purchaser as party to the final decree proceedings for protecting her interest in absence of her vendor does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. It is however, made clear that the interest of intervenor opposite party in the final decree proceedings would remain confined to protection of her land purchased from defendant No.1 and getting the same included in the share of defendant No.1 and in no event she will be allowed to interfere in any other matter nor she would be allowed to make any objection in the matter of execution of final decree. This Civil Revision application is accordingly disposed of with the aforementioned observations and directions. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)