IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10974 of 2008 VINOD SINGH & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 16.05.2008 Heard both sides. Altogether six petitioners have approached this court for grant of anticipatory bail in a case instituted under various sections including section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners draws the attention of this Court to the averments made in the First Information Report to show that the allegations are only against co-accused Arjun Ram and Mahendra Ram who are said to have fired. Thereafter, there is general allegation that all accused persons fired. Learned counsel for the petitioner referring to Annexure-2 (injury report of the informant ) and submits that in spite of all these allegations the informant would receive only an abrasion of the size of 2”x ¼” x ¼” on the back of left knee joint. It has further been submitted that the land dispute is somewhat admitted in the First Information Report itself. In the facts and circumstances, let the petitioners namely, Vinod Singh, Birodhi Singh, Bilar Singh @ Birendra Singh, Jitan Singh, Ram Jatan Ram and Sita Ram, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand ) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the - 2 - Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur ( Bhabua) in connection with Chainpur P.S.Case No. 140 of 2007, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Sym/ ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )