IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN TUESDAY, THE 28TH APRIL 2009 / 8TH VAISAKHA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 2220 of 2009(F) ------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN BA.1556/2009 Dated 31/03/2009 CR.NO.32/2006 OF VADAKARA EXCISE RANGE .................... PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED : ----------------------------------- MUHAMMED HANEEFA, S/O.ABOOBACKER HAJI, SHAINAS MANZIL HOUSE, PAPPAYA THODIYIL, UPPALA P.O UPPALA AMSOM DESOM, KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.DEVIDAS.U.K RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT : ------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, THROUGH EXCISE INSPECTOR, VADAKARA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.P.RAVINDRA BABU THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P. BHAVADASAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No. 2220 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of April, 2009. ORDER This is a petition filed under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail. 2. Petitioner is the second accused in Crime No. 32/2006 of Vadakara Excise Range for the offence punishable under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act. 3. The facts are stated in the order of the court below, which is appended to this petition. It is seen from the records that the first respondent has already been released on bail. It is pointed out that final charge has been laid. There is no reason to deny bail to the petitioner. The application is allowed as follows: 1) Petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of Magistrate Court concerned. 2)Petitioner shall not tamper or attempt to tamper with the evidence or influence or try to influence the witnesses. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE scm