m WW! h msim-w ’ URE AT BILASPUg IN THE HIGH Qwm‘ o’F JUDICA / W. P. NO--—L—‘-3:E§----- /06 ($3.) J. M. Kag (Patwari P. H. NO. O2 4 Binjeli) Aged About 47 Yrs S/O Shri Rajendra Nag RIO Narayanpur Distt Bastar (C’GJ PETITIONER VERSUS CONSTITUTION OF INDIA m /” ‘ RESPONDENTS : 1 State Through of Chhatttisgarh Secretary Department ,u‘ of Revenue ,D. K. S. Bhawan ’ " ‘ Raipur (C.G} 2. The Commissioner r, (Land records) Raipur (0G) 3. The Coliector _,/ District Bastar (0G,) a“ If“ y ‘v /\\%’ l 0v {gxfggzggi m 4. Deputy Collector ,/' Lmd records. Jagdalpur §~< p d ‘“ District Bastal (C.G.) avg; PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226i227 OF % XI—HC—78 @ E W , W , W ' .wr.-..ta.%&&7%.. WW Fa 200 Wm (W) WWW W 3WELXI1Ti$ WWW§wmR m m w m $Wm 14-8-2006 Shri Avinash Mishra, counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Gnvt. Advocate for the State/respondents, on advance copy. Heard. By the instant petition, the order dated 315‘ July 2006 whe he has been transferred from P.H. No.02, viiiage Binjeli, Revenue Cir e Narayanpur to District Dantewada. petitioner has chalienged his transfer r The main grievance of the petitioner is that he was appointed as strict Jagdaipur and since then he is The post of Patwari as per the Land Record Manual Chapter i is the di trict level post, therefore, he cannot be transferred to, another district the same affects seniority of the petitioner. In the circumstances, coun el for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to mak, Ara representation to respondent No.1 and he be directed to decide the e, to which counsel for respondents has no objection. Having heard learned coun el for the parties, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the ca e, and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the peitioner is allowed to make a detailed representation along with a cop of this petition and annexures to‘ respondent No.1 within a period of 15 days from today and in turn, respondent No.1 shall decide the epresentation of the petitioner within a period of 3O days from the date of receipt of the representation, after considering all the points raised by he petitioner, in accordance with law. Patwari in the year 1989 in the sewing in the District Jagdatpur. P.T.O. y i a m XI—HC—78 1H 200 mm (W) am mirmw m m m m Learned counsel for the responden$ submitted that in pursuance of already been relieved but the post of Patwari is of district level and he ha been transferred out of the district. In the circumstances, the ffect and operation of the impugned respect of the petitioner shall remain stayed, till the representation of the etitioner is decided. With the direction aforesaid, he petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No. 2890006 also stands disposed of. Parties are entitled for certifi d copy of this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge mm§mw ém§rrm \l" Barve the transfer order the petitioner h order as well as relieving order i P.T.O. s ww,ediwe,%amgt