1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6868 OF 2011 IN W.P.NO.5650 OF 2009. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J. Date : 23.09.2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2 The appearance of Mrs.Deshmukh, learned counsel is wrongly shown as counsel for Respondent No.2. On the last occasion, the notices were issued to the Respondent No.2. As per the Bailiff report, the said notices are served. None appears for the Respondent No.2. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the Respondent No.2 is trying to change the nature of the suit property and has brought the JCB machine on the site for the damage being caused. The said averments are not controverted by the Respondent 2 No.2 as none appeared for Respondent No.2 though served. 4. The learned counsel for the non-applicant No.1 does not have any objection for the grant of relief as claimed in the present Civil Application. 5. In light of that, ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (B). (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.23.09.2011. asp/office/Ca6868.11 3