IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGAKH : B1LASPUR Petitioners Writ Petition No. 2404 of20U5 1, 2. 3. 4. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. l/'. 18. 10 Versus Respondents 1. 2. Ramlal S/o Gtiansliyam, R/o ViU^e Budbuda, Tah Ssraagarh, Distt - Ra^arh. Sum.urti, S/'o Nitai, R/'o Pikrunal, Tah Sarangarh, Distt - Raigarh. Laio Bai, W/o Raui Prasad, vIUage Khaprapali, Tah Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh. Aiijor Singh, S/o BhiiMiau, R/o Vfflage Barpati, Tah SarauRarh, Distt - Rsas.arh. Bakaati, W/o Lala, R/o ViUage Pujeripali, 1'ah - Saraugarh, Distt - Ra^arh s/, Bhusbo, R/o Tah- Saraugarh, Village Distt - >j£ii<lso, Pandriparu, Raigarh, Scuitosh, S/'o Shivnafh, R/o Vulage Saiia, Tah- Saraiigarh, Distt- Rawarfa. Mayadhar, S/o Bhoklo, R/o ViUage Pauchdhai', Tali- Saraagarh, Distt- Raigarh. Chit Ram, S/o Brindawan, R/o Vfflage Kandoia, Tau- Saraagarh, Distt- Ra^arh. Janak Ram, S/o Sarthi, R/o Vm- Chhewaiipali, Tah- Saranga.i'h, Distt- Raigarli. Bhairi Dokri, W/o Jagtaraa, R/o ' VU1- Raipur, Tab.-Saraagarli, Distt- Raigarh. Shyam Lal, S/o Sundar, R/o Vffl- Mauhapali, Tah.- Saraugarh, Distt- Raigarh-; Se\¥ak Rata, S/o Sukhi RaEtt, R/o Vffl- Katangpau, Tah- Saraugarh, Distt- Ra^arh. Tengun, S/o Dhallo, K/o ViU- Bokramuda, Tah- Saraugarh, Distt- Rsdgarh. Kirtan, S/o Jai Lal, R/o Viil- BaajipaU, Tali- Saraagarh, Distt-Raigarh. Dukalu, S/o Dfle Ram, R/o Vffl- Navghata, Tah- Sarangarh, Distt- Raigarh. Tosu Ram, S/o Moti Ram, R/o Vul- Sukbapati, 'l'ah- Sarangarh, Uistt - Ra^arh. Krishna @ Meena, S/o Lahri, R/o Vill- Aiuurra, Tah- Saraagarh, Distt- Raigarh. Briadayan, S/o Bhursvo, R/o ViU- Parasrampur, Tah- Saraagarh, Distt- Raigarh State of Chhattisgarh, through ; Collector, Distt Raigarh. TahsUdar Ta&sU Saraugarh, Distt Raigarh _IBfet ft ..-..vy .'^ .-,-^?' -1- (Writ Petition underArticIe 226/227 oftfae Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agxufaotri J.) SIu-i Sameer Sahu, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Vivek Shamia, Pancl Lawyer for ttie respondents. TIialcm ORDER (Passed on this 17th Day ofNovember, 2008) 1. Learued counsel appearing for ttie petitioners, on instructions, subinits tbat the petitioners seek permission of fhis Court to withdraw this petitioa with Uberty to take recourse to the oth.er altemative forum that niay be availabte to the petitioners, under provisions oflaw. 2. Leamed counsel appearuag tbr the respondents/State lias no objection. 3. ln view of the above, the petttion is disinissed as withdrawn with the above stated Uberty. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge