IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No: 3994 of 2009 BETWEEN: 1 G. Chittaranjan Reddy, S/o. Alwal Reddy, R/o. Angadipeta Gate, P.A. Pally Mandal, Nalgonda District. 2 Smt. G. Subhadra Reddy, W/o. G. Chittaranjan Reddy, R/o. Angadipeta Gate, P.A. Pally Mandal, Nalgonda District. ... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Special Deputy Collector (land Acquisition), Alimineti Madhava Reddy Projects (AMR Projects), Gandhamvari Gudem, Nalgonda. 3 The Special Deputy Collector (land Acquisition), AMR Project Unit- II, Nalgonda. 4 The Secretary to Government of Andhra Pradesh, Irrigation & CAD (MAJ.IRRGN.III(A) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly Writ of Mandamus to set aside the notification under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act in File No. D2/9380/08, dated 27-11-08 (which is published in Andhra Jyothi Daily News Paper on 4-12-2008) on the file of the 2nd respondent in so far as the lands of the Petitioners concerned i.e., to the extent of Ac. 0.16 gts in Sy.No.137, Ac. 4.10 gts in Sy.No.146 and Ac. 1.01 gts in Sy.No.149 of P.A. Pally Village, P.A. Pally Mandal, Nalgonda District by declaring the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents not to acquire the petitioners lands i.e., to the extent of Ac. 0.16 gts in Sy.No.137, Ac. 4.10 gts in Sy.No.146 and Ac. 1.01 gts in Sy.No.149 of P.A. Pally Village, P.A. Pally Mandal, Nalgonda District in pursuance to the 4(1) Notification in file No. D2/9380/08, dated 27- 11-08 (which is published in Andhra Jyothi Daily News Paper on 4-12-2008) on the file of the 2nd respondent and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.M.VENKAT RAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn granting the aforesaid liberty. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________ C.V. RAMULU, J March 2, 2009 DSK