1 ndm 61 cp.170.07 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 170 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4609 OF 2002 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. N.P.Shimpi for the Petitioner. Mr. S.M.Gorwadkar for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 7th December, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. 2 The breach alleged is of directions contained in clause (2) of order dated 21st November, 2005 passed by this Court in writ petition filed by the Petitioner. Direction was issued to decide the representation of the Petitioner in the writ petition within eight weeks. 3 Though belatedly, by order dated 7th December, 2007, the representation has decided. 4 There is a delay in deciding the representation, however, one cannot come to the conclusion that the delay is deliberate and willful. 5 The grievance of the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner is that the order dated 7th December, 2007 is erroneous. 2 6 As there is substantial compliance, no case is made out for proceeding under the Contempt of Courts Act (Bombay High Court) Rules, 1994. Petition is disposed of. Remedy of the petitioner is kept open. [ A.S.OKA, J ]