IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3641 OF 2003. PETITION NO. 3641 OF 2003. PETITION NO. 3641 OF 2003. WITH WITH WITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3264 OF 2003. PETITION NO. 3264 OF 2003. PETITION NO. 3264 OF 2003. M/s Jaysynth Anthroquino ... Petitioner. V/s. Association of Chemical Workers ... Respondents. Shri K.K.Singhvi, Senior Counsel with Shri A.K. for the petitioner. Ms.N.D. Buch with Ms. Bina Dholakia for the respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 14.11.2005. : 14.11.2005. : 14.11.2005. (Dictated in open Court) P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : ---- ---- ---- . Shri K.K. Singhvi, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner in both the petitions, makes a statement that in view of the earlier orders of this Court dated 3.10.2003 followed by order dated 10.10.2003 passed in these petitions, and order dated 30.6.2004 passed in Civil Application No. 541 of 2004 filed in the Writ Petition No. 3641 of 2003 along with Civil Application No. 542 of 2004 filed in Writ Petition No. 3264 of 2003 and subsequent order of the Division Bench dated 11.7.2005 passed in Civil Application No. 133 of 2005 filed in LPA No. 463 of 2004, and Civil Application No. 541 of 2004 filed in Writ Petition No. 3641 of 2003, xerox copies of which are placed on record, both petitions were disposed of. As such, none of these petitions can be said to be pending. 2. According to Shri Singhvi, office has wrongly placed these matters on board for admission before this Court. 3. Learned Counsel for the respondent concurs with the submission advanced by Shri Singhvi and accepts the statements made by the learned Counsel Shri Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners and confirms that both the petitions have already been disposed of though formal orders indicating disposal remained to be passed. According to the parties to the petitions, these petitions are not pending. Compilation of the orders passed from time to time take is taken on record. 4. In the above view of the matter, office is directed to treat these petitions as disposed of in view of the joint settelement between the Counsel for the parties.