.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.59 OF 2000 IN WRIT PETITION NO.999 OF 1999 Smt.G.Pratibha Raghuram and Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus The Union of India and Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr.Satish Shah with Ms.Retiwala i/b.Rustomji & Ginwala, Advocate for the Petitioners. None for the Respondents. .... CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 13, 2006. NOVEMBER 13, 2006. NOVEMBER 13, 2006. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. None appears for the respondents. 2. By the present Chamber Summons, the petitioners are seeking to amend the petition as per Schedule annexed thereto. Perused the affidavit in support of the Chamber Summons. For the reasons stated therein, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) & .[2]. (b). Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today. Amended copy of Petition to be served on the Advocate for the Respondents within one week thereafter. Respondents are at liberty to file affidavit-in-reply including with regard to the amended portion. 3. Place the matter on board on 27th November, 2006. [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]