IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SUNDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10196 of 2002 Between: 1 M/s. Amara Raja Battaries Limited., Rep. by its Company Secretary, P. V. Varadarajan, Chittoor At. Giridrushya, Renigunta , Cuddapah Road, Karakambadi -- 517520. 2 . P. Varadarajan,Company Secretary M/s. Amara Raja Battaries Limited, At. Giridrushya, Renigunta , Cuddapah Road, Karakambadi -- 517520. Chittoor Dist. 3 Ramanchandra.N, Galla S S/o. G. Naidu, At. Giridrushya, Renigunta , Cuddapah Road, Chittoor dist. Karakambadi -- 517520. 4 Jayadev Galla, S/o.Ramanchandra.N, Galla S At. Giridrushya, Renigunta , Cuddapah Road, Chittoor dist. Karakambadi -- 517520. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Registrar of Companies, Kendriya Sadan, Sultan Bazar, Koti, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Director, Department of Compnay Affairs, Sastry Bhavan, Haddowns Road, Chennai -- 600 006. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to pass an order or orders or writ more particualarly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, decalring the inaction of the respondents in not processing the compunding application filed under Sec 621 ( A ) of the Companies Act., to compunding the alleged violations against the petitioners herein asillegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondent to dispose of the compunding application and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: M/SC.KODANDA RAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: Sri A.Radhakrishna, Central Govt. Standing Counsel The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 10196 of 2002 ORAL ORDER: Sri Swaroop, learned counsel representing Sri C.Kodanda Ram, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. ____________ 09-06-2009 asp