1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.06.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD)No.6145 of 2011 R.Kalarani : Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Tahsildar, Rameshwaram Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. : Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to provide appointment on compassionate ground in pursuance of the first respondent's proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A4/9104/2010, dated 20.02.2011 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ajmal Khan For Respondents : Mr.S.Chandrasekar Government Advocate ORDER Mr.S.Chandrasekar, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 3. The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition for a Mandamus, directing the first respondent to provide appointment on compassionate ground, in pursuance of the first respondent's proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A4/9104/2010, dated 20.02.2011. 4. The case of the petitioner is that she has passed plus two in the year 2003 and scored well. While she was studying B.Com., II year in the year 2005, she got married. Since her husband could not afford to continue her education, she has to discontinue the same. Her father one K.Chinnasamy was employed in the second respondent Taluk Office as Office Assistant and he died in harness on 20.01.2002, leaving behind the petitioner, her mother and two elder brothers as his legal heirs. The second respondent, by his proceeding dated 16.08.2004, recommended to the first respondent for providing her appointment on compassionate ground. At the time of making an application, she was unmarried and got married only subsequently. She has preferred numerous representations to the respondents seeking appointment on compassionate ground. However, her case has not been considered so far and hence, the petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition for the reliefs stated earlier. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. Considering the limited scope of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the claim made by the petitioner, I direct the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 28.05.2011, on merits and in accordance with law and also in the light of the recommendation made by the second respondent, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Accounts) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Tahsildar, Rameshwaram Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. +1CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR.18495 +1CC TO MR.M.AJMAL KHAN, ADVOCATE SR.18554 Sml SR : 22.06.2011 : 2p/5c Order made in W.P.(MD)No.6145 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/