CW12824/08 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.12824/2008 Babu @ Ikbal Versus State & Ors Date of Order ::: 10/04/09 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Ms Rekha Arora, for the petitioner. Mr.Chetan Bairwa, for the State. Instant petition has been filed assailing order dt.13/10/08 whereby his application though got through various adjournments, was finally rejected on the premise that what has been demanded by him cannot be made available in view of S.9 of Rajasthan Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act,2006 (“Act, 2006”). Counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner being a citizen of India is entitled to get copies of note/order-sheets as sought for in his application including order dt.06/10/08 - in absence whereof, it is causing great prejudice to him putting his liberty U/Art.21 of Constitution at stake. Counsel further submits that under the Act, 2006, powers are vested with District Magistrate/State Government to make orders for detaining certain persons after taking note of overall record of person provided for being examined under the Act, 2006. Order of District CW12824/08 //2// Magistrate, Bundi dt.06/10/08 and the report U/S 3(3) of Act, 2006 referring it to Principal Secretary, Home Department have also been shown to this court. “Detention order” is defined in S.2(d) and while passing it, the Authority is under obligation to disclose grounds and reasons for detention of a detenue as required U/s 9 of the Act, 2006. Indisputably, the petitioner has not been detained so far; in such circumstances, order- sheet/order, certified copy whereof being demanded by him alongwith certain documents in view of S.9 of the Act, 2006 cannot be provided to him at this stage. Consequently, I find no substance in the present petition, which is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. (Ajay Rastogi), J. OmPrakash/12824CW08Apr10OmPr.doc