IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE :PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 435 of 2009 Between: Mohd. Abdul Waheed Khan, S/o. Late Mohd. Abdul Khader Khan, R/o. 66, Dinsmore Avenue Apartment 310 Frammingham Massascusetes 01702, USA, rep. by his Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Shaik Usman, S/o. Late Mahboob, R/o. 19-3-543/25, Aliabad, Hyderabad. ..... Petitioner AND 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Ranga Reddy District. 4. The Deputy Collector & Tahsildar, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R.District. 5. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Deputy Commissioner, Rajendranagar Circle, Hyderabad. 6. Sri G.Hanumanth Reddy, The Deputy Collector & Tahsildar, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R.District. .....Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in refusing to mutate the Revenue Records with respect to an extent of Ac. 1-00 in S.No. 48/23 of Kattedan Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District by incorporating the name of the petitioner under the provisions of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattedar Pass Books Act, 1971 (Act No. 26 of 1971), as abuse of Process of Law, Malafide, Arbitrary and illegal, and consequently, direct the 4th Respondent to perform the Public Duty caste upon him under the provisions of the A.P. rights in Land and Pattedar Pass Books Act, 1971 (Act No. 26 of 1971) by mutating the Revenue Records, thereby incorporating name of the Petitioner as against the said extent of Ac. 2-00 in Sy.No. 48/23, Katedan Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed herein and the order of the High Court dated 20-01-2009 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M.Ravindranath Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of the G.P. for Revenue for the Respondents 1 to 4 and of Sri R.Radhakrishna Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No.5, the Court made the following: ORDER: The 6t h respondent appeared and he states that on account of mistake in processing of the matter the impugned memo came to be issued and he undertakes to take necessary corrective steps. His appearance is dispensed with for the present. Post on 29-01-2009. Sd/-G. VENKATESWARA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, Ranga Reddy District. 4. The Deputy Collector & Tahsildar, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R.District. 5. The Deputy Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rajendranagar Circle, Hyderabad. 6. Sri G.Hanumanth Reddy, The Deputy Collector & Tahsildar, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R.District. 7. Two CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court of A.P.Hyd(OUT) 8. One CC to Sri M.Ravindranath Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 9. One spare copy. HIGH COURT LNRJ DATED: 20-01-2009 NOTE: POST ON 23-01-2009 ORDER WP.NO. 435 OF 2009 DIRECTION DRAFTED BY: SAH APPROVED BY: DRAFTED ON: 20-01-2009 HIGH COURT LNRJ DATED: 20-01-2009 NOTE: POST ON 23-01-2009 ORDER WP.NO. 435 OF 2009 DIRECTION