IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6212 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 6212 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 6212 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 2546 OF 2005. APPEAL NO. 2546 OF 2005. APPEAL NO. 2546 OF 2005. Dr.Ramesh K.Doiphode & anr. ... Applicants. Versus. Suresh Kanuba Doi[phode & others. ... Respondents. Shri H.N.Mirashi for the Applicants. Shri V.N.Sagave for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 28th April, 2006. : 28th April, 2006. : 28th April, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. The substantive prayer in the Civil Application is for stay of execution of the impugned decree. The prayer in the application cannot be granted as the suit filed by the Applicants has been dismissed. The learned Advocate for the Respondents on instructions of the Respondents stated that the Respondents have filed a suit for possession against the Appellants. The statement is accepted. In view of this statement, there is no necessity of granting any interim relief as of today. Application is rejected. Judge. Judge. Judge.