In the High Court of Judicature at Patna Cr. Misc. No.15702 of 2008 Nanki Mistri @ Raj Kumar Ram Vrs. The State of Bihar **** /3/ 07.07.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. The first information report was instituted under Sections 394 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. During investigation, allegation against Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code was found untrue. So far Arms Act is concerned, there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner. The recovery of arm is from Rakesh Kumar. So far petitioner’s name is concerned, it transpired on the basis of confessional statement of Rakesh Kumar. 3. Considering the facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner, Nanki Mistri @ Raj Kumar Ram, is allowed. He is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of his surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sahiyara P.S. Case No. 31 of 2007 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Cp:3/S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )