IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 24TH OCTOBER 2008 / 2ND KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 31434 of 2008(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- R.KRISHNAVENI, W/O.GOPALAKRISHNA KAMMATH, 36 YEARS, MOOPPILMADAM, THRIKKARIYOOR PO. KOTHAMANGALAM, (PEON DBHS, THRIKARIYOOR, KOTHAMANGALAM. BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOTHAMANGALAM 3. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, O/O.THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, TRIVANDRUM. 4. HEADMISTRESS, DBHS, THRIKKARIYOOR, KOTHAMANGALAM. ADV. SRI.K.N.VENUGOPALA PANICKER, SC, TDB FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.31434/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner was appointed as a full time menial and is presently working as a Peon. By Ext.P7 she was placed under suspension and seeking revocation of the suspension she has filed Ext.P8 before the 2nd respondent. It is there upon the writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P7 itself. But having regard to the fact that the grievances are already taken up before the second respondent, I direct the 2nd respondent to take up Ext.P8 and consider the same with notice to the petitioner and the respondents 3 and 4. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. 2 Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. c ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 3