IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31212 of 2011(B) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ DEEPAK T., S/O. CHANDRAN T.S., AGED 23 YEARS, RESIDING AT THAYYIL HOUSE, VALLAPUZHA P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 056. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 056. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. T.A.SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.31212/2011 B APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DTD.27.10.2011 IN RESPECT OF HIS 1ST AND 2ND SEMESTER EXAMINATION. EXT.P2 : A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DTD.27.10.2011 IN RESPECT OF HIS 3RD SEMESTER EXAMINATION. EXT.P3 : A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DTD.27.10.2011 IN RESPECT OF HIS 6TH SEMESTER EXAMINATION. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 31212 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the combined 1st and 2nd, 3rd and 6th Semester supplementary examination was declared, he had failed one paper each in the above semesters. He applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge