IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 924 (SS) of 2011 M.S. Martolia. …..…...Petitioner Versus Khadi and Village Industries Commission and others. ……….Respondents Present : Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate present for the petitioner. Mr. V.B.S. Negi, Assistant Solicitor General for Union of India. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Mr. D. S. Patni, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. V.B.S. Negi, Assistant Solicitor General for Union of India. The petitioner is working in Khadi and Village Industries Commission, Dehradun (from hereinafter referred to as KVIC). He has been transferred vide order dated 01.07.2011 (Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition) from KVIC, Dehradun to KVIC, Shimla. The petitioner is aggrieved by the said order. There are no plausible grounds here, which may call for any interference from this Court. Transfer is an exigency of service, which can only be challenged on two grounds A) if there is any statutory violation or B) if there is any malafide. None of these two grounds exists in the present writ petition. The only ground alleged in the writ petition is that the petitioner has old parents and who need to be looked after in Dehradun. On these grounds, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. However, the petitioner is at liberty to move a proper representation to the concerned authority, who may look into the grievance of the 2 petitioner and pass any such order he deems fit and proper as expeditiously as possible. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 26.07.2011 SKS