IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (S) No. V’sg /201o ”é, Loknath S/o. Balduram Dhruw, Aged about 40 years, Daily Wages Employee (Line helper) in Municipal Council Baloda Bazar, R/o. Pahanda Road, Baloda Bazar, Tahsil — Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (C.Gl) PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Urban Administration and Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .r... .V, ,. 2. Director, Urban Administration and Development, (Nagar Panchayat, Nagar Palika, Nagar Nigam), Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Collector Distt.—Raipur, Raipur (C.G.) Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council, Baloda Bazar, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 5. President, Municipal Council, / Baloda Bazar, Distt.— Raipur (C.G.) HILIH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR é WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1958 of2010 PETITIONER : Loknath VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgaIh & Others. Writ Petition Under Alticle Ulqder Article 226 OfThe Constitution Oflndia SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K Agnihotri, J. Present: Shii Janak Ram Velma, Advocate for the petitioner. S‘ari Shashank Thakur, Pane} Lawyer for the State/respondents. Ashok GRA] i ORDER (Passed on 27m day of April, 2010) Heard. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation to the authorities ooncerned to regularise the services of the petitioner in accordance with circular dated 5/3/2008 issued bv the State Government. Learned counsel for State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits, Within a period of six weeks from the date ofreceipt ofthe representation. 1n View ofthe foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. nothing survives for adjudication. Consequently, the petition is disposed of.