THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.481 of 2004 ORDER: The petitioners are appointed as Teachers in different categories in the 4th respondent institution, which was admitted to grant-in-aid. Their grievance is that though number of aided vacancies in the institution have arisen, their cases have not been considered for absorption. They seek a declaration to the effect that the action of the 4th respondent in not submitting proposals for their absorption against aided vacancies is unjust and illegal. They also seek direction against the other respondents to consider their cases for absorption. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. It may be true that the 4th respondent is an aided institution and there exists several vacancies. Even assuming that the petitioners are qualified and otherwise entitled to be absorbed against aided vacancies, the fact remains that the Government imposed ban on appointment of teachers against aided vacancies. As long as the ban continues, no relief can be granted to the petitioners. Hence, the writ petition is closed, leaving it open to the petitioners to work out their remedies as and when the ban is lifted or set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 23-09-2010 Prv