,<-^c^ ^^-'^^••?: i Q'-o ^:^:^^..--- ^.^••-^^•^7-' ;?"'^^w"' fel-1-"" /" >i?agi®Seneh IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETETCON f S ) N0. s.a.k\ OF 2009 PETETIONER '^. RESPONDENTS Virendra Kumar Jha S/o. Shri Jagannath Jha,aged about 38 Years, Occupation - Service, Posted as Patwari at Halka No. 100 Jagdalpur, Distt.- Baster (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.6.) 2. The Collector , Baster, Distt.- Baster (C.G.) 3. Satyanarayan Sethiya S/o. Late Shri Pancham Sethiya, aged about 40 Years Patwari Halka No. 105 , Tahsil - Jagdalpur, District - Baster ( C.G.) WRIT PETETEON UNDER ARTCCLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTCON OFINDIA FOR ISSUEANCEOF APPROPRIATE WRIT. 311^1 W R'fi'n W 3IK?I »11<» *(T*<ctr^*<i<!b ^sf 'tfn\w<i, w-^ww, ^wwy. ........V^:..e.^...c&.5....'23x^j. ^ 313^?? 'q5RT (liclfj«<<S!:T) ^wwoft^an^ff 8B : HON'SLE SHRI J'JSTICE t>|a3:TINKBR_DIWAKSR OS.07.20Q9 Heard Dr.Sanjit Sharma,] Yashwant Singh'Thakur, Dy, A.C| Chailenge in the preseij 30.06.2009 (Annexure P/l! pasd within five months, the petitione| Halka No. 100 to Patwari Halka 1 he may be permitted to withd| representation to the State Govi direction may be issued to t^, representatidn so made and till t| duties in the present place of po? Learned counsel for the S1 iTiakes a representation to the decided expeditiousiy. Accordingly, the petition aforesaid liberty. In the eventu^ representation within ten days fj eh)^ld41-1 T^f^ ^ t^E3f il^t'^R '^ajfOTan^r couRsel for the petitioner & Shri |. for the State/resp. No. 1 &• 2. [t oetition is to the order dated id by the resoondent No.2 by.which - has been transfen'ed t'rora Poatwari fo. 98. ' Contention of counsel fof the petitioner is that the transfer order has been issued iust to acclomraodate the!respondent No. 3 who somehow wants to remain at Patttvari haika No. 100. He submits that taw the petition with liberty to fiie bniment. He further submits that a State Govei'ninent to decide the hien he may be allowed to perfoim his ;me. ate has no oDjection il the csetitioner respondent No. 1 and the saine is .s dismissed as withdrawn with the litv of the petitioners making such •om the date oi' receipt ot' this order. the same would be decided by tl'je ai-ithorines within a period of three weeks from the date of its rec^iot. It is clarined that till then the petitioner shall not be relieved |rom the oresent piace of posting, if not already relieved. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge