IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CR No. 4426 of 2008 Date of decision March 21, 2009 Kaushalya Devi ....... Petitioner Versus M/s Jain General Store ........Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Anil Kshetarpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V. K. Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prashant Vashishth, Advocate for the respondent. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The landlord is in revision against determination of provisional rent. The contention in revision petition by the learned counsel is that the tenant has denied his status as a landlord and that has entailed in forfeiture of tenancy. 2. The East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 itself does not make denial of title as a ground of eviction. It shall still be a matter for adjudication at the time when the Court ultimately passes an order on evidence of both parties about the consequences of the denial. At the preliminary stage when the Court determines provisional rent, the rights of parties themselves are not decided. By the very nature of things the determination is provisional subject to the rights of both the parties to contend what is appropriate and seek for adjudication after full fledged trial. 3. There is no scope for intervention at this stage. The revision petition is dismissed accordingly. March 21, 2009 (K. KANNAN) archana JUDGE