THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4543 of 2010 ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 30.08.2010 in E.A. No.439 of 2008 in E.P. No.774 of 2008 in O.S. No.1364 of 1994 on the file of the III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur whereunder and whereby petition filed by the respondent/ decree holder to grant police aid to implement injunction decree by protecting the schedule property/to restore the southern bund as well as boundary stones, was allowed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. The trial Court, by judgment dated 25.02.2008, decreed the suit declaring that the plaintiff got title to item no.1 of schedule property having inherited the said property from his paternal uncle late Hussain Saheb, and granted a consequential permanent injunction in favour of the plaintiff restraining the defendant no.1 and her men from in any way interfering with the rights, possession and enjoyment of item no.1 of schedule property of the plaintiff. On appeal, the said judgment and decree were confirmed by the first appellate court. Aggrieved by the same, the defendants filed second appeal before this court and the same is pending. Admittedly, the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court, as confirmed by the first appellate court, have not been suspended by this Court. 4. Because there is allegation that the judgment debtors high-handedly removed the boundary stones of the schedule property and destroyed the bund in between the schedule property in complete violation of the decree, for implementing the injunction order, police aid was rightly granted, and there are no grounds to interfere with the same. But, inadvertently, in para no.7 of the impugned order, the trial Court observed that there was obstruction from the respondents therein (judgment debtors) to deliver the plaint schedule properties into the possession of the petitioner, and therefore it was inclined to allow the petition permitting the petitioner to get police aid for delivery of the plaint schedule properties into his possession. But, that is not the stand taken by the respondent/decree holder in the affidavit filed in support of the E.A. No.439 of 2008. Therefore, the observation made in para no.7 of the impugned order is to be deleted. 5. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. However, the observations made in para no.7 of the impugned order are deleted. --------------------- 29.10.2010 (K.C.Bhanu, J.) DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4543 of 2010 29.10.2010 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4543 of 2010 29.10.2010 Between: Shaik Hussain Bi & another …Petitioners And Shaik Habibunnisa @ Habimunnisa …Respondents