IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26241 of 2010 ROHIT YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.25535 of 2010 SHANKAR SAH @ SHIB SHANKAR SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 11.08.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. Renewing the prayer for bail on behalf of the two petitioners it is submitted that the identification in the TIP is of no consequence when Ratnesh Kumar Singh is not a FIR witness and neither does the FIR which has been registered against unknown mentions the presence of any other except for his wife. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. I, Madhubani in Sessions Trial No. 53 of 2010 arising out of Madhubani Town PS Case No. 629 of 2008. The bail bonds must bear the photograph and proof of residence of the bailors which shall be verified through the local police before final acceptance. The petitioners are required to be properly represented on each date in the trial including their physical appearance on specified dates that the court below shall so direct. In the event of default on either aspect hindering progress of the trial the court below shall be at liberty to deal with them appropriately to expedite the trial notwithstanding the present order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)