IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 9927 of 2005 Between: 1. T. Subba Rao, S/o late Ananthaiah, aged about 61 years, R/o Kumarapuram Village, Pithapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 2. T. Venkataraju, S/o late Ananthaiah, aged about 85 years, R/o kumarapuram Vilalge, Pithapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 3. T. Ramu, S/o late Ananthaiah, aged about 80 years R/o kumarapuram Vilalge, Pithapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 4. T. Rayudu, S/o late Ananthaiah aged about 78 years, R/o kumarapuram Vilalge, Pithapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 5. T. Apparao, S/olate Ananthaiah, aged about 59 years R/o kumarapuram Vilalge, Pithapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 6. Thyummalapalli Chakrarao, S/p late Ananthaiah, aged about 57 years, R/o kumarapuram Vilalge, Pithapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 7. T. Seetharamaswamy, S/o late Ananthaiah, aged about 54 years R/o kumarapuram Vilalge, Pithapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Pithapuram Mandal, E.G. District. 3. The Executive Officer, M.S.N. Charities, Jagannadhapuram, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 4. The Commissioner, Social Welfare Department, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in the land to an extent of Ac. 3 cents covered by S.Nos. 55/2 and 56/2 of Kumarapuram Vilalge, Pithapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.VL.N.G.KMURTHY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORAL ORDER: Heard both sides. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner is seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners’ land to an extent of Ac. 3.80 cents covered by S.Nos. 55/2 and 56/2 of Kumarapuram Village, Pithapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for petitioners is unable to show the cause of action for filing this Writ Petition. Hence, I see no reasons to entertain the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _______________________ ELIPE DHARMA RAO,J DATED: 27.04.2005 ka To 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 2. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Pithapuram Mandal, E.G. District. 3. The Executive Officer, M.S.N. Charities, Jagannadhapuram, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 4. The Commissioner, Social Welfare Department, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 5. Two CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 6. Two CD copies.