IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15144 of 2009 1. MANOJ KUMAR S/O SRI BISHWANATH PRASAD R/O VILL.- KURWAN, P.S.- GOH, DISTT.- AURANGABAD Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION AURANGABAD 4. THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER AURANGABAD 5. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER AURANGABAD 6. THE ANCHALADHIKARI, GOH BLOCK DISTT.- AURANGABAD 7. THE MUKHIYA, CHAPUK GRAM PANCHAYAT P.S.- GOH, DISTT.- AURANGABAD 8. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, CHAPUK GRAM PANCHAYAT P.S.- GOH, DISTT.- AURANGABAD 9. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, BLOCK- GOH DISTT.- AURANGABAD 10. MANOJ KUMAR S/O RAMANAND SHARMA R/O VILL.- PAKARI, P.S.- GOH, DISTT.- AURANGABAD 11. AKHILDEO PRASAD CHAUHAN S/O SATYANARAIN CHAUHAN R/O VILL.- CHAPUK, P.S.-GOH, DISTT.- AURANGABAD ----------- 2. 16.02.2010 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the state. Petitioner was appointed on 08.05.2005 on the post of Panchayat Shikcha Mitra. After sometime, on 31.12.1995, he proceeded on Medical Leave. It is not stated whether the leave was sanctioned or not. However, on 19.7.2007, he filed an application for allowing him to rejoin. Since the petitioner was appointed on the post of Panchayat Shikcha Mitra on 08.05.2005, that period must have come to an end after 11 months. In the meantime After 11 months, the person who was re-appointed or who was given extension on the post, was absorbed on the post of Panchayat Teacher on account of his continuation on the post of Panchayat Shikcha Mitras w.e.f. 2 Akv/- 01.07.2006. Now, his vested right cannot be taken away by allowing the petitioner to rejoin against non-existing post w.e.f. 19.07.2007. Petitioner has no case. This writ application is dismissed. (Mridula Mishra,J.)