cwp135.11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.135 OF 2011 Chhotulal s/o Krishna Chaudhari, R/o-25, Manmad Jin, Opp. Water Tank, Dhule, Tq. & Dist-Dhule. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Home & Excise Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai, 2) The Special Inspector General of Police, Nashik Region, Nashik, 3) The Superintendent of Police, Dhule, Dist-Dhule, 4) The Collector, Dhule, Tq. & Dist-Dhule, 5) The Superintendent, State Excise Department, Dhule, Tq. & Dist-Dhule, 6) The Police Inspector, Deopur Police Station, Dhule, Tq. & Dist-Dhule. ...RESPONDENTS. cwp135.11 2 ... Shri. A.G. Magare Advocate for Petitioner. Shri. N.H. Borade, A.P.P. for Respondents. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE : 10TH MARCH, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. 2. Consequent to Order passed by this Court on 24th February 2011, the learned A.P.P. makes a statement on instructions, that police protection would be provided to the Petitioner subject to rules, on his depositing required fees. The learned A.P.P. further submits that investigation is going on in Crime No.5 of 2010, registered at Deopur Police Station, Dhule. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner points cwp135.11 3 out that police machinery has also filed criminal case against the persons against whom the Petitioner has grievance. The persons who are named as assailants in the complaint filed by the Petitioner, are not made party to the Petition. 4. The learned A.P.P. submits that police would investigate the case and take suitable steps to ensure that peace in the locality is not disturbed. 5. In the light of the statement made by the learned A.P.P., the Writ Petition is disposed of. We express no opinion on merits of the matter. [A.V. POTDAR, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/MAR11/cwp135.11