IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.M-21674 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.8.2009. Sheela ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Sudhir Hooda, Advocate for Mr. Nishant Raj, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL J. **** The petitioner is an accused in FIR No. 284 dated 3.7.2009 registered under Sections 3,4,5,6,8 and 9 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. As per the facts stated in the FIR a raid was conducted on a secret information that the petitioner was involved in immoral activities. It is further mentioned in the FIR that after seeing the raiding party the petitioner ran away from the spot. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that all other accused who were arrested from the spot and were found to be involved in immoral activities, have already been released on regular bail. Nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner. However, considering the seriousness of allegations against the petitioner, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail. Dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 10.8.2009 JUDGE Reema