,. IN :rHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELPJ + FAO 244/2005 & eM No.12110/2005 MOHfu'll SINGH ..... Appellant. Through:l.tr .l'vLl'\i.Dutt. Mv. DHARAMPAL & ORS. . .... Respondent fhrough;l,tr.&u1Jay,JaIn, :SrAdvocate- With l'Ilr.Arjun MItra, Adv. tor R 1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHA..'VNA ORDER % 12.01.2006 It Is p61nted out by the learned counsel for the parties that there was an Interim order 1n favour of the responde-nts durlnJ the- pendency of the suit which has been decreed by grant of decret' of permanent filjunction. Learned counsel for the respondrnts 1 & 2 states that they have no Intrntlon whatsoewr of creating any third party 1nterest or carrjing out any construction 1n the portion of the- property 1n their occupation. In view of tht' "aid statemrnt. It'arned counsel tor the appellant does not press tor any other relief aga:tnst respondel"lts 1 & 2 and &tates that he Is not seek1ng u,'1y relief aga1n'St respondents 3 to 6. The statement given by the counsel for thf' respondents 1 & 2 ...111 be b1nding on the'm. The statement made by the learned coun8el for the respondents 1 & 2, will continue Ull the dIsposal of the appt':a! Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified : and is rqade without prf'Judlce to the rights and contentions of tht" parties. Keeping in view the nature of the controversy. the trial court may dispose of the appeal a."l expeditiously as possible. The appeal and eM No.121 ]0/2005 stand disposed ot: JANUARY 12, 2006 sb/P y