P.R~49-94 APPEAL Mgg / 5:3 c, .mr’s name a; ¥ w * Q side11ce“;‘i?~’*tm5{m\t FgtyrgaH ivx'h73??%@r a Age 6?? yak/C r “I‘VgEQ‘W? fé‘gi'é? Efgé‘ EWAL] or; A15 w 4 , 9 é gnwH abmétw mtenced to J Under Section if he states he wishes to be represented by a legal It is explained to§the prisoner that ] ; W ’_, x r practitioner the apdellate Court will not proceed with the case for seven days unless the 3 legal practitioner aqpears earlier‘ If the legal practitioner does not appear within seven ‘ - M days he may not heard at all if the Prisoner states that he does not wish to be repre- §""\ sented by legal practitioner the eourt may proceedat once with the case and will not ‘ be obliged to give a‘ hearing to my legal practitioner who should appear. i l Date of Application for copy of Judgement i . . Date on which copy recelved ‘ Whether the prisoner wishes to be represented or not. ¥eoo§ev 3 Date on which Appeal sent am a a 208 fl dwih/gé 33234f - 2p 4J§éyll No 14674 / a? Confrnedm £Jygi' gain; 33' “Q; {jiJail' {g,’wé .Pu y i No. ft! Forwarded to the A Dated I u‘*m€~§t2 Wear 4t x, at to gether with a copy of judgement or order passed in the case for favour‘“of transmi- % ssion to the proper Appellate court. Sti@@§@’“l , ‘f’v i earl WVLJ £ *7 Lb c @ OF PRISON E R p / Evitlcn heat (Criminal) “Name p\_ / *dblél CHlQrl " cFooooom 096 by 53% a, 73. T. acmuelftéi toe-ac K Name \ a u e ‘ 49/3 C’i/LH g to, Q assign. I“ JJI®tQ ’7; J a “ 3 ,7,‘"~1\ <;\a L ‘ of in N ‘ h / t j Date of receipt of record to accompany the Memo 0f Apvéal t0 the Appellate court K: i Néo Dated r ................. 199 ................. ‘ Forwarded’to the y. * tie-g mu t! hm a‘7”3" ‘Taixash x~i , UR Date of receipt) in Appellate co rt J “taint w j XIvHC‘ZZ WW WW WWW WW a *Wm a biVIsIoN EENCH: r I HQEELE MR LC. BHABOO ANE F’JNELE' ‘V‘F ‘f K $HRIVA$TA¥AE J3 j. 21-12—2005 Miss Sangeem 'Méshrm coun ‘— l W ‘ Mr. Ashish 'Shuklu, PubHc P aw-rm! with Mr. Alak Bakshil Ifmvi F Advom‘fe Far fhe Sfafeirespontien' ; nma V. u. judgmen’t EV f'his an:peai 1'hrougi1 fke rdécused Kadu Kai has ques‘rioned' convicfia’n and semence dafed 15th Aprii, 1996, passed by fine 5f” ur/ in Sessians Tria? NoAO7/95, s Judge affer heiding fhe aqcuseci/ sf offgnge Lindar $ec+icns 3Q2 r3: 201 go impr5sonmen? for iife and RI. for “Me years, respec?ive!y. I? was aisa directed ma? both fhe senfences shail run ccncurreni’iv. The case o; I .Llme proszcuTiaH, with his wifa Phoalkunwgr Bai was Kai, ma‘fernai fgf'har-in-iaw n‘l" fhe ac‘éused in his houge. Gayadin 39. So‘me how accused Kodia came fa [Eii‘v‘3éf@ Addi+ionui Sessions Judge, Eiias: whereby ieamed Addi?iam1 Sessior r3ppelian1' guih’y far The mmmission a ’07r "me . I.P.C. senfenczd him 1"o undet in brief, is 111a: acéused Ksdu aicng ‘esiding in Village: Pakariyn, gayadir! accused, was ais§ residing wi‘i'h ‘r'he K0! smrTad cammi‘mng rape an ?hoelkunwar Bai af-Ter fhrem'ening h eriiq‘renden‘f; Cen‘rml JaiL Biidspun fhé iegaiiw of firm juéigmefi? of \ ........................................ . ..... FHBKET ‘ p r s XI-HC-22 mam i Wamfi%€izfm Wm ; ‘ mmmm W $a$man€¥r ikncw abcuf fhe said raiaficns 9f hi: wife and mafernai Tafher-m Haw LGayadin. 'Therefore,-on 29-é-1?9§ accused sérv d hquor To uaycxam and When > Gqyadin was siaaping affgr consuming liquor, fha accuszd affacked jé‘uyhdin wi‘rh a Tab‘bcxl on his neck, us q resuif of which f'he ne¢k was cuf had: C-ayadin diet}. Thereaffar, z.ccused Kwu hurried 7he $ody of Eaycxdin in dpif in The Jhorki drain; which was behind Thaj house of Tha- accq§e¢i Whén Viiia‘ge Sarpungh Budhiyu Bai, Kgfwgr Nmheiai’md aiher parse s came it: know abou‘i’ missing; .ei‘ @aygdin, they enquired frem The accused on 53,1995 abou'i' fhe wi eaboui’s of éayadin. 0n gnquiry by 5arpanc'h gudhiya'gai, Keiwar‘ Na mgdg gxfm juaigigi wnfessio‘n be mg fhgm fng‘i' ha ha tiurriad fh‘g in affer' commi‘ifing his muréizr. hi manuaa, in l it‘D‘ \i Iii/v6,\ icdgéd #he rapcr‘i‘ ': The P“‘ico S‘Pai'icn VJuma an “-7— $95 \On receivirig i’h‘e reporfr Ewiion HaUSé Officer Rajesi‘iwar 5ingh regisirgrzd "rhe. F‘I.R. under qac'r n< 39? & ”71 n‘F +i1-F EFF and i'h blaod from fhe nausea. He aisa ’ 0 "rack info passe§sion The haw and wc arrcws ’r'rtggn The accused. Even fhe cic'l-hes of me deceased w re alaa removed and Taken ima possession Accu;ed Kodu gave me omncim’s while m ‘i'he pouce eus‘fodv regarrimg Tabi‘ai and 'i'l'Ie dead be y, based HF The memnr‘ui'IdLrn The body of cayadm was exhumed from fine Jhorki dram and fhe iabbai was Iuiew x n r e iai rmé of’ner: viiiagers, fhe bad/y af Erayadin in ‘rhe Ehorki racovered B'ha‘i'i & Tabbrili si'ainad m m 2 r XI~HC—22 Iaiso faken in‘ro yosseeaioa. Pancimamn e‘F +he Body was; preparedk l ‘ H'hereaf‘fer, fhe body of‘G—ayadin wa§ §ervr far po‘s?umprfer’n exarginafién' Hg the Primary HeaHh Cem‘re, éicxurela. Dr. Rf; Mishm (PW-7) ?cend‘uc+ed posf-i’nnr'fem ¢ri +he body of Egyudivi on 6-7-i995 and he ‘gf‘é‘mrec’ 1‘i‘ie pos?—marfam repor‘.‘ ExP-EE. We bady ef‘éa‘y'adin was m $2 advancgd sfcxge of pufrefacfbn and smeilwas emanafing from fhe‘ bow. The ieé'? hand wag missing; n muscie and'subcu’mn‘eous Tissues we're missing’fbm The righT hand, ra‘was a cu? injury en 'é'he 'rhyreid cari'iiage in fHe size-cf i8 x 4.5 45 ‘cmsu wind pipe! foo& pipe-é rieuramus‘cuéar bund‘Ee were aiso fa d cu; magga?s were presam‘ in fhe ‘ wgu'ndg, garvicgi ver‘rgbm N¢$£1 & wasg {:uf injury in 'i'iaz size of 13 x area, injurywcs cbiique mdirecti‘o I“ Tug epimcn cf Ha docmr, ‘rha injuries were am'e—mor'rem in namr‘ and ware caused 5—10 days be‘FGre fine ciafe of msT-mér'rem. The came of déafn Was éxcessév‘e b‘eedérig and syncape, same Was hamicidal in- mum. The recevared ar‘risltzs wara $2n‘i- fa fhe Foren§ic Science L Epm'forv Sa§ar and as ber- +312 -abam‘f 3/5 ,ewcm‘, biccd was fuu a warg +mi1$vgrse§ycut and i’here 5 x 4.5 cms. on igf‘i' supra-quacaiar on Tabi: ‘ $DHGH y ‘iha u;cu3ed rand en The cim'hes a. +he deceased eiyJ gmn‘h underwear; baniynn. afier complé‘i’ion of mves‘h ion charge shag? was fiie§ in fina Cour? of Judicxai Magisi'mfe Firs ”lass, Pendr'a §agd whe in ,‘rurn r [wwam s i .e u I ‘ . . n u n m g ? XI-HC-ZZ WW, Wm,m W‘m -390~ K WW WW %aqf?rqawr%¥1 ‘ mmaxm ~4L ‘ ‘ x ‘ I K Vpksecg‘rion avid-ans; .nnd plaid d innacence. Sesa‘iém Judge affgr ‘hg‘aring 1" e argumem‘s cf Acidi‘iiemé Pubiic PFosecuTor' é‘nd counse! fer 'The a cased cenVic’fEd cad semenced The v accuséd as men‘rioned in pam‘i oi: 'i' is gud‘gment e f We have Eeai‘d Mia: garag a iWshm, §eamed csurise‘é a .C ‘6? fhe appgiign‘f and Mr, Aghigh Shuklg, 3e rneé Pubiic Prgggggfcr- wi+h Mr. Nok Eaks‘ni, Learned Govt Advocafe for he Sm‘i'efrespnnden‘i'. As far as The nature cf dem- ‘af {S'ayadin as homicide! in ne‘rure is cancerned. learned counsei far +he appeilanf argued fhaf ‘rhe body was Eh h pufrefied cohdi‘tion, 'i'here'fpre, 'T was n’o‘r'possibk fer fhe doeToh f6 give epinion abnut the cause of deg in fhis conhecfion, if we iooit info fhe evidence of Bra E££Mishm {?W-7}, who canducied pesT-mor'r m an #he heady cf Eeyadin, he has sfm'ed ‘H‘m‘f 'I'he body was in ‘Hae dvanced sfééée of pb‘h‘efacfion and smeh was emana‘fihg from *r‘he bod He has fur‘i'her sfa‘fed fha-T There was (a) an incised wound in The si e‘f i$ x 4.5 x 4.5 ems. on ‘rhe- neck beiow ihe ihyroid‘carfiiaqe, wind' v commh‘fed wha case 1'6 fhe Sessions Judge; giia‘spur,_ frdm where: iearne'd 5*”Addi‘ri6mi SeS$ions Jué receivzd The case for ‘rriai, '~ VWzfprosecufion in order fa asfabiish charge against fha accused examined'nine wifnésses. Onj'he finer- hand, s‘fnfemenf o1: 1’hé accused was recorded under Sec?§on The Cr-RC. in wmcnL L"e ugnied, A ?he Learned Addi'l'ionai an; i1? G A4: \ e ‘ , z ' ’Side neuromuscular bundies were fut m§g§o+s were pres'an? in fhe mury (b) car‘wmi ver‘fehm C; c3: p2 were faund cuf Transvér$aiy: (cyan :mnsad womd m fha SE5 0f 13 x 4.5 x 4.5 ems. on ia'f‘t supm—cevicular ’ar-vn Un Infernm exammm‘ton rr wnc found_+hn+ hii “ring neuromuscuiar iuundtes of ‘f a nec.< were cut wmd pipe, fooé pipe and TWroid §imds ‘ V ‘ ’ I were cu‘u‘, C1, CE & C3 vertebra w fwnd fractured; in para 9 of h€s evidencé, 'i‘he docfor has stated fha fhe cause oi: deu‘i'h was syncope as‘ ‘a ‘r'esuh" ef eicessive bieec‘ing and ‘His'reportis Exp-12. .m waw of *§‘e bcve eviderice 0‘ ‘%‘e doca‘or w‘w corducfaa nom— méri’em we $3 m? fmd qnv sub$+ nca m +he gmumznf advangw bv jenr‘mea counse! Tar me appelinn‘r. As far as Thé invsiéemem f ‘Yhe accuSed ,En gcmmiffing ”me murder ~01: Gayadin is cencemed, Mi s Sangee‘ra Mishm, Iearhed counsel i fur ‘fha appéiiam’ aré‘ued.fhaf ‘f‘fté .IR. was {edgéd wifh fine déhy 6i; nine days. 5&5 further arguad ‘tha fha bedy which was axhumad was fhe evidencg af ‘1'he dochr-LH’ has came 111m: ?h'ere.were n6 markg on he bcdy ’1‘0 ascér‘min whei’her the body was oféayadin and fhaf nob dy saw 'jhelggccused whacking fhe deceased. On fhv oTher hand Mr N i‘ Bakshl Earned V€’ov1'. Advcccrre supporfed 'Hne Judgmem' 01' The 7mm ‘ur'i'; ‘ naTure of gem?! was hemicidaL .nm" in iden‘i-ifiabiz candifion. Even i XI—HC-22 ' e e o XI-HC-22 mm WW Wmmw WWW ®2°rW aaazmm .;g ~_ i1- mu fram which an inference of guil‘i’ cc by ‘unimpecchébie evidence led by circumsi'ances pui' fogef'hcr are no? ‘3 1 p3€'‘a€ Ihc ului'1 n0 nuny a5 ?:‘J Lm and at“: mi‘ gqpgbua cf gray gxplcxng' hyp?’Thais m" fhg guii‘i’ Mr 1412 accusa New, we shail prccead- Ta e aéducad by fine prosecu‘rien To ccnr \Gayadir‘uu A5 i‘ar‘ a$ ‘fhé firs? fjoin‘ appalicmf fhrzri' 1he body was n9? i! hady mms f'ha‘i‘ af Gaycdin, in fhi: I? is +rua firm? fhere is m di 4ec+ evideme in ‘hia case wi‘messim circum$i'an?iai evudeme A§ pér f ’fhercr‘i’me \ ”'he cra§e r‘aa‘E or: ?hé ‘3?i+ied gmnripls< aid down by +§w \ Nesm‘ Ahmed vs 96hr? 416 *P‘a in a case basec§ or V . Cour‘r can record conviction, Tim e -ian'b!z Apex Cgum‘ in. ‘Hm muff-2: f S+a+a of ‘Bthdr repor+ed iq’ AI§ 200i Suprame evidenca, L.bemre s; ¢L me cércumsmmid 3+ safisfy Hag”: fh’a'r circ‘gms‘mncgs uid be drawn have been. e$‘%’abii$i1.ed “reserwer and ‘rha‘r ah *he r4 oniy of q conclusive na‘i'ure bu? also I wringéy yam? fa l .é gm}? 6f accused hm which i$ he? cans§§t¢n+ wéfh ‘fha A 'G. mmma Tha arwmsaWm! ewdmca ec’r i'he accused wn'h, 111a murder o‘F f miséd by {earned dounsai f6?“ i‘he‘ r IdenfrFiuble condrhorl W +$1ax ‘Hw : connzc'non The accusatiiappeimm maae ex m Judlcm cor ession befcre 3udhx'yc QCmPWn) Bud. m. (”Wk 5) c Ncmhela: {laws}. Deceased (mvadm bemo ma‘fernal fa'rher—m law cf fhe accuSéd was residing WWI The accu§ed As par The ewdenc; af " Budhiya Bai (?W-i}, in fhé nigh? w house andfinformed‘ ‘Hna'i' +he accuse L 4m Tu!” 1995 Gaga! came 1's her d' has murdered éayadin. 0i: hearing- [n3%W XI—HC-22 fma she calied Village Ko‘l'war Nanheiai (PW 6) and m fhe nex‘r day mormng niéng wrth kwwar Nanheual and oiher persorws she wen‘r f0 The huuse- Bf {Kadm Thay saw ‘i'haj‘ The pfr was fiikad wi'rh fra$h‘sand near the, hguse of fhe dccused‘ an whichfiies were making buzzing sound, a‘r fhu‘if, Wm? Kedu was nof GT His reséderca .The en‘Ter' du came Tn ”e! keuce v and enquwed from haw as fo whv Thzv w€nf 1'0 his r‘esidanca and Thergufmr, ner husbana Budhim I'Wb ‘5) enqulmd from mau aoouf 6ayedin, V 4 ‘ 'rhen 0 ihe'accused dischsed _ Te Them Thc? acycdm was havmg iiiici'r reia‘rions wi‘i'h his wife Chgndmkaii, which he couid‘jnoi' foier-a‘i'e, ?§iaF€TuF& 1‘18 1&3 F1Ln x u CuYuuin Wi?ir‘l Th3 $8. Th€.GCC5J$ in‘fvrmgd; fha'i' qfi'gr gemmiffmg i+g migrdgr gf LEQyadih, his brgdy hag been hurried. This guidance has bran corroborm‘wd by Bua‘hiai (PW-5) who is ma Se fhm The "umahr: §Hdhrm ”a. (”31% Nanheid Ko'Mar {?W«é) has aisc carrebwam: *rhe above s\)i&ence. VAs $er fhe eviééricé bf Ea‘eshwar ~ 5mQh LPV" $1 (m 63-1995 iéadu gave memerandum, baséd a1 ‘E‘ha‘r, ‘s'he bgdy a}: @yadk: was exhumed and 'Panchnama in ‘i'haf e'fecf ExP—ii was prepared. {in the “cane o. cccur-mrce A r7 gu get)? Tram Fahdm R ad ”m gc e under bx P-lé hereaf'l'e” Lmder' E P—‘7 “‘he docfw a'F Primarv Heal‘r"! Cehfre! Ezaurem wae requeSi’ed in: ohduc‘f #né gasf-morwm. bit RC, 1%. M (9 -7\ rcrdLcfed The pr.- -mor’wm He has s?aTed in his evidence 'Fhaf .1'he> body was i3 fi‘Fiea: By §udhini & éopai Ahir'. V ‘ ' 3 i ; V‘ A u ‘ ‘ if 3s es‘rabiished ‘fhaf fhe acéuseci made exim Juc‘iicia! mnfession‘ bef re Eudhiya Bai (PW-1), Budhk‘xi (RW- 5§ & Nanhalu! (PW-é) regardhg c mmiffing fhz murder 13f {ifcyadm 91 accnun‘i‘ of 1412 icqt‘f Tim? Gayu‘din w s having iiiicif raia‘rions wif'h his wife md ‘rhe'reafwr", fhe bbéywas exh .ed a. fhe §nsmnce7m .t +4.. me caused. ‘W‘ém-t i‘hia bcdy of éayadin was gxf umgd, doH’ugs wgrg pmsgn+ on We; bady, ’therefcre, ‘i’hg bady was] id i;ied wii’h Thehaip 9fcio‘rhes’ ais‘o, whiZh is e$id§nwr frem'ExP-ii ?an nama'ef ?he Eody. In View 0f The abova evidence, if is esfaHished 1" a'f‘ i'he body of which post-mor‘rem ' was cwducfed by Dru R‘C.'i‘v“\§shm (F‘ -7’) was fé‘ia‘f 0f Cugudm. ‘ A$ 1hr g3 141$ aghy i2? {cdgm 'Hqg rgpar? is mmgmad, (as §gyaqiin was t’egiding wi‘i’h ‘rhe accused-and acnusadnaf'i'nckzd Eayna‘in when v he was sieap'ihg afTar ccnsuming ,iiq awher'eaffar, he burrieti Tha bcdy, as There was nebad‘g +5 wi‘rriess» ‘i crime and fhe crime came ‘te ‘rhe iig‘nf only whé'ri 6ayd&in wasr‘fdund mEssing from ‘a’hé résiciémce CV? f‘ne' accused and rm enquiry by 1+;a Sar 1 {PW-1), fha accused made gxfm iudi‘ciai confession befar‘e her, ‘rh $4995. As §er‘?ha $eTTied iaw, d fam! oniy when fhe dgiay is caused in arder‘ 1b 5§bokwp a case am? for rfz'iiée impiimf/ion 0f any person in Th crimé. Ema in fhé pres—arr? cas‘e‘ as has been menfienad above, fhe de has eccasioned aniy on accoum' of fhe facf firm? ‘fhe crime wa’s‘co'‘ ffea‘ in such a way 1'ha1' noboéy i - [11%W ‘> 1 Therefare, §rom fhe é'bove evider l fer, i-h‘e vapori- was in&gza on 5- i.ay u ' m i.ougmg An: the vapor“? becames a u . a i c ’ g ‘ e u k p d f z i i m i XI—HC-22 iwi‘friassed fhe crime. Therefore; Vfi' be i’er‘mad '3'0. be %a?al in fhis msé.‘ ' Learned caunsal for fha accu: The gx‘fm Judigiai cbnfessio'n‘wns, 11 I . I lKomarhfherefor‘e, The exfm Judie m‘r admissibie. in evidencg. I?! Thi$ Evidence Ad, 1872, envisages Thu? “‘A cenfessicn. made ' irkiavanf in a'crimiaal +312 confeésian appears caused by any mdua havihg reference 1's aufhar-ify and suHicie Court fo give ‘u‘he acc ’wauld appear +0 him re by making if he wauid ahy evii of. a ‘rempomi grocewings againsf him, The Sarpanch cf a viHaga and be per-Sens in aufhorify. Moreover u I . . .a " ,- fha? accused Ka'du made exfm judiciiai confe§$ign on acmun“? OT any §nducnzmant “threw a? gromisz. From "rhg evidence of Bud'i’iiyn‘Eai (PW—1); Surpanc'h of Viiingei‘ ?akariya! when cne C-épai informed ew L i ‘ ‘ by an accuse? persen is areceeding; if ‘i'he‘ ranking of 1'9 fine Cnuri’ fo have bzen amenf, fhreai ar- promise ihe charge. Vaguinsi irhe accused person..lproceading “Frem a ;Derson -in nzi’, in fine opinion of fine .ised persan graunds which zsonubie fur suppasing ihu'i gain any navanfage an avoid‘ nm‘um in reference ‘i'o fine e deiay in iédging +he répér‘i canne‘r ad/anpiilant further argua'd flan? as nude before +i1e $arpunch and “Hag mi confession made befare mam is, éanngc‘fion, Sacfitm 24 of fhe Indian a; The Kofwar came? ba ccnsi'ciarad Ta , ‘i'i‘iere is no aiiegafion in. fhis case . her abcu‘i iiie murder of Eayadi i, [n { : XI-HC-ZZ \ Ebeing Sarpanch‘ c‘F The viliage, sh Where she saw signs of newiy dug s nd an 'fhcrf day, fhe‘ accused was no? m? his residencz, arid when he ca a buck‘fn hem house har husband ,enqumed tram “me accused abou'r iaayadm his ma+emul fn‘rher-m iaw +ln In he has murdered him wafk' fhg axg. ' h “Same has‘ been cgrmbomfad by‘ (PW-é). accused was coerced‘ or induced or ‘Haa'i' +ine accuse& was +hrea1'ened Ta wnfess 'mm’ie #76 aXuu JUdlCtu: Qgnfgggicn mgda by}hg imwsgd vo‘iun‘mry and sama was ‘rrua 'becnu ”used Tim body cf 6cyadlr .va disciased by fhe accused Everi ‘fhe Wéapw 6f affenc¢ Tabbai'Was disc recover-ad a‘‘f, ’fhe ls ‘baen proved by Rajeshwar Singh who has sfai'eni 'Hmi' an 5-7-1995; recovereu he. iron Tabbal and om ”‘5 and in p'Tsuhnce of Thu? he 9c? *Gmé Wd§ T‘nkef1 WWO pOSSQSQOf‘i UN prnved Er P-é In para .7 9f his ex sfa‘i'ed fha'f a7 fha ins‘l'ance' 01': ac: [n3éW wem' +0 *he house of +he accused A? u a? lime, The awgeu discios d Tha‘ as myadm was hawm Jaw rgiafims wi‘rh his Wife’fhqf is w ud‘ ‘ai (PW—5) and Nanheiai Kafwar‘ Thé're is nofrhin§ in ‘fh ir eyidence, which shews Thai The a. TEer‘fare, bgfgrg Tkgg #hrge wifnzggs wag ~ s2, "rhereaf‘rar a? fine ins‘mnce of ‘sha’ exhumed fmm a piaca which was .LL- . d. :,..!:..‘ l In: €x1F€ Juumia: £nsfqnce m‘ ‘rha accused; which hz (FW—Q), ‘i'he Invesfig’a'i'irig Gfficer' 'rhe accused gave mama“ “dun Ex piece of Dho'h sfamed wH‘h bioad; zer' Ex.?-6, Nunneiai (Pv‘ti- has a§sa ddence, Qajeshwar $ingh‘ (PW-9) has :used Kodu, one sharp edged Tabbai i XI—HC-‘22 and one pieée o‘F Dhofi were reco zergd under EXP-6. I These ar'l'icles were sen“? fo‘ The ESL. for exami r’éon and as per The repor'i“ cf F53.” Sagcir, Tabbai, :fhe! weapan 9f aff rice and #he piaca 0f Dhafi of tha' accused wére found shined Wif‘h 'bl od‘. Therzfcre, in view of fhe above circums'rances proved by The pros swim vé2;,’7ha1' The accused made “gym judicial confession beforg B Wye; Bai (PW-1), Budhlol (PW-5) & Nanheia§ (PW—6), fhe ether .circ mncas fhaf fhg body of deceasea’ - 6&/cdin wasv‘exhumed a? The. ins . ae of The accused frem The piaca near fhe house of fhe accused, flue weapon of offence and +he piece of ‘ Bhofi of fhe accused were also recovered a? The insfenv o. .E or.,her accuged, seme were eemt' fer chemimi exemine'l’ien, ene es per fhe ESL. report Ex.P;22, same were found s-‘mined w3‘rn' blood Considering the above eviden :e, we are of The considered opinion he? fhe pres'ecufion nos been obie 1'0 prove ‘ihe offence againsf fhe ’accused/appelian+ regarding his invoivemen‘i in commif‘fing ihe murder of éoyadin, and ’rhe chain of circumsi‘an‘ces are so compiei’e fho‘i pain? only +owords The invoivem'en'i' of ‘i'he accused as ‘i’he owl-her of +he crime. n View of 1‘he' above discussion, we are oaf fhe opinion-Tho? i‘he finding of fhe frioi .Cour‘l' convicfinc fhe occuseffor The commission of offence under Seceion 362 of fhe EPA’; is based on iega‘i moi ciinohin evidencei'which does no? require any inferference, by ihis Court [11%m ‘ “ § n ‘ u. ' ¥ t n g XI—HC«22 As Far aé flue offence under, Sec‘rion‘ 201 a‘F fhe I.P.C_. is ¢c1nceméd, as ¢ér 'I’he evidenca dscLiS$éd if: fhe eariizr‘ pdr? of'més 'J‘gdgmaaf, fha ‘uctsuséd after commh‘ing Thamurder of Gayudéf! hurried his bcdy in +hg Jhbrki drain Which was sifua'fed behind fhe hoQse of Hm misused Thereby he cause& d§sa rmce of; fhe :iidence ef murder case Wifh 141:3 mfenfion 1’9 sgre n hmxseif fram {eml punishmen'r Tnerefore Me acru=ed nus mgrrH' \ , ‘ r ' \ ‘ ‘ [ D€€n COHVICT€§ TOF 1+1? CGmmI$$lDn of offance uvadsr- Sewer 2w 01‘ Th I P f‘ “’59 In fhe result we do no? ‘hn any subsfance in fhisapp'eai, same ' [wwv p a being devo§d o. r'mm'r nube Ta e dismazsed emu n" .3 agce u agly __‘ i,,,z W éigmisxd: Sd/— ] “*‘saf’f‘\ Vljay Kumar Shrivastava i n Judge a a" ‘ L.C.BHADOO 1 ‘ r i&* M7 ; Judge ‘ "