PeWJGners 2) O) V diGn CGIERT OF CHFIA’a'ESGARH: B§LA5PUR Wfii Peiiiion {$§ N6. €$§4 of 209? Rohit Kumar Sahu Sio Pura'} La‘ Sam aged abaut 41 years, éccupation Peoon presentiy wmking at Govt. Middie Schod. Laxmipur, Q03:— Mifiguda, Biock — Dharamjaygam. Dist Raigarh (CG) Natawar Sing‘n Parja; Slo, Nan’nuram Parja, aged about 44 years: occupation — Peoon working at Kanya Aasharam Laxmipur; post -— Miriguda, Biook Dharamjaygarh: Dist Raigam (CG). Radheshyam Ratre: S/o‘ Eelhuram Ratre, aged about 33 vears occuoaiion peon working at Ba§ak Choatrawas Koadgaoni post Khadgaoo, :ock Dharamjaygarh, Dist‘L Raigarh (CG). Girdhar Prasad Ratniya, Slo. Punau Ram Raihiya, aged about 4O years, occupation peon, workmg at Bahia? Baiak Aasharam Dharamjaygarh, post Dharam}aygarhs Biock Dhammjaygarh, Dist. Raigarh (CG). Jayia! S‘mgh Thakur‘ S/o. D‘S. Thakurx aged about 43 years, occupation — Peon workingr at Bh’hor Ba£ak Aashram, Dharamjaygarh, post Dharamjaygarh, Block Dharamjaygarh, Dist Raigarh (CG). Uday Bhan Singh Thakur, Sio. Bhara: Singh Thakur‘ aged abou‘r 37 years oncupaiion Deon preseofly working‘ at Pré‘yojoa Kawaiaya: Dharmjaygar’n, Distt‘ Raigarh (CG). Bhupnandan FJrasad Danseoa, Sio‘ Uday Ram Dansena; aged about 35 years‘ occupation Peon 7) workino SupkaE, at mistriatoaigam Kavya Aaoharam (CG). Pakhanakoat, Post Baouram Daosena, 8/0, Bihari Lai Dansena, aged about 37 yearo, occupatton Peon presentiy working at Kanya Aasharam Pakhankoat Post Supkaio, District Raigarh (CG). Veisos State oi Chhattisagarh. through the Secretary, Aadim Jati Tatha Anusuohit datl Deveiopment Deoarzment, DKS.‘ Bhawan. Raipur, District Raipur (CG). The Coiiector Aadim Jati Kalyan Branch, Raigar‘ni Tahsi! and District Raigarh. The Commisstooen Aadim Jati Tatha Anus-omit Jati Deveiopment Department Raipur. Resgoodents 3) 4) Assistant Commissioner. Aadim Jakti Kasyan Vibhag, Raigarh. O1 v Th5 Biock Educaticn Offxcer. Dharmjaygarh, Disirict Raigarh (CG) (Writ Petiiion under An‘icie 226 of the Censtiiuiion of India} SB: Hon’bie ML Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Pieseni: Shri P K Pate! counseiforthe petitioners Shri Saiish Gdpta, Gévt, Advocate forthe'State‘ ORAL ORDER {a’Dassed en 25”“ Fgbmary; 2mm; The petitioners were initiaiiy appointed on the post of Peon and were granted regular pay scaie after compietion of three years. Admittediy, the reguiar pay scaie granted to the petitioners was reduced vide order dated 4‘1 O-19Q7 (Annexure Pit) without issuing any snow cause notice to the petitioners i 2) learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in Writ Petition No. 2125 of 2002 (Sent Kumar and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others}, which was aiiowed vide order dated 18-1-2005 and the same was upheid by Honibie the Supreme Court vide order dated 9-4. 0—2006 passed in Soeoiai Leave Petition (CNN) No. 171 22i2096i Learned oeunsei further submit that this petition may be disposed or“ tn the same terms to which learned counsei appearing for the respondents/State has no obiection Learned Government counsel is not in a position to controvert facts as stated by Shrt Patel. s) in View of the above, the writ petition is atlowed in the same terms ire, the imougned order dated 4—104 997 (Annexure PM) is quashed and the petitioners are entitted to rsguiar pay soaie acoordingiy from the date, the same has been withdrawn by the impugned order, subject to vertrication of the facts No order as to costs, Sd/r Satish Judge Rain K. Agnihotri