IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1116 of 2008 Perm Ram ...Petitioner Versus Managing Director, Uttarakhand Pay Jal, & Nirman Nigam, Dehradun and others. …Respondents. Present : Mr. Siddharth Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D. S. Patni, Advocate for the respondents. Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Heard Sri Siddharth Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioner and Mr. D. S. Patni, Advocate for the respondents. The petitioner prays for his regularization in Uttarakhand Pay Jal and Nirman Nigam. In view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in State of Karnataka & others V. Uma devi (2006) 4 SCC 1, such a prayer cannot be granted. The writ petition is therefore liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move a representation before the concerned authorities and in view of the paragraph 53 of Uma Devi’s case, if there is any scheme for regularization the claim of petitioner for regularisation shall also be considered. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 23.5.2011 Kuldeep