IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16205 of 2011 PRABHASH YADAV @ PRABHASH CHAND YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. 1800 liters of kerosene oil was seized which was alleged to be transported for black marketing allocated for B. P. L. beneficiaries. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. Petitioner is a P.D.S. dealer and his name sprang up during investigation. It appears that the tractor in question on which kerosene oil was being carried subsequently transferred in the name of own brother of the petitioner. Since the petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. hence, complicity of the petitioner does not get reflected. From the order of the learned sessions judge it does not appear whether any verification of stock 2 register of the petitioner was done by the investigating agency or not. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Udakishunganj P.S. Case No. 152 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Madhepura, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)