IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.3219 of 2011 Manjit Kaur Vs. State Bank of India, Ludhiana & others Present: Mr.Amit Rawal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has filed third party objections before the Recovery Officer, DRT on the ground that the property where the notice has been affixed belongs to her and she has no connection with the loan in question for which the property was put to sale by way of auction. The objections filed by the petitioner were rejected on the ground that her counsel did not dispute the identification of the property. As per the counsel, no counsel was present on the date when this order was passed. The application for review has been declined primarily not on merits, but on the ground that there is no typographical, printing or patent errors or mistakes, which would need correction. If what is stated in the petition is true, obviously the petitioner being a third party would not be under any bar to claim a necessary relief by filing a civil suit. The petitioner, if so advised, may accordingly take her alternative remedy of filing a civil suit in case her property is being put to any sale without any justifiable reasons. The petitioner may file this suit within one week. The proceedings initiated in respect of property described in the head-note shall remain in abeyance for one week from today. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with direction to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy of filing civil suit. February 23, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE