1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 10 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION NO. 10 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION NO. 10 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 175 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 175 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 175 OF 2006 Sanjiv Ramrao Thakur. .. Petitioner. vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr. C.K. Bhangoji h/f R.K. Mendadkar, for Petitioner. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP., for respondent nos.1 & 2. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE: 5TH MAY, 2008. DATE: 5TH MAY, 2008. DATE: 5TH MAY, 2008. (IN CHAMBER AT 5.00 P.M. ) (IN CHAMBER AT 5.00 P.M. ) (IN CHAMBER AT 5.00 P.M. ) P.C. . Heard. 2. This review petition has been filed on the ground that the petitioner’s caste certificate ’Thakur’ has been invalidated by the Caste Scrutiny Committee merely on applying affinity test and, therefore, this requires reconsideration. Further, 2 the issue is pending before the Full Bench. 2. We have gone through the order. On the date this Court disposed of the petition it was not brought to the notice of the Court that there is a reference made to the Full Bench. Further, we do not find any error apparent on the face of the record so as to review our decision. Furthermore, affinity test as held in Madhuri Patil’s case is an important aspect which is required to be examined while determining caste claim of a person. Therefore, the review petition stands rejected. No order as to costs. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.) (Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.) (Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.)