IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2319 of 2011 Date of Decision : February 08, 2011. Anju Dhawan and others .....Petitioners versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.T.S.Dhindsa, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) After arguing the case for some time, learned counsel states that in sum and substance the petitioners want sympathetic consideration of their claim by the Management of the respondent-Corporation as they have served the Corporation for a sufficient long period to the entire satisfaction of its superiors. In the light of the above stated plea, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to submit a self-explanatory representation to the Managing Director of respondentNo.3-Corporation who shall then consider the same sympathetically and dispose it of by passing a speaking order in accordance with law as early as possible and C.W.P.No .2319 of 2011 2 preferably before the fresh recruitment is made. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. February 08, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE