1 wp147.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 147 OF 2011 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. S.S. Patil, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.J. Ghute-Patil, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr. Mahesh Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No.3. 1. During argument, it transpired that the petitioner accepts borrowing of loan of Rs. 7 Lacs. Only to show bonafides, learned Counsel for petitioner, upon instructions, states that the petitioner will deposit an amount of Rs. 8 Lacs. 2. Learned Advocate Shri. Deshmukh for respondent no.3 pointed out that the remedy of Revision under Section 154 of the M.C.S. Act, 1960 can be availed of by the petitioner. Learned A.G.P. raises the similar objection. 3. As the amount equivalent of 50% claimed in recovery certificate, is offered by the petitioner to show his bonafide, and therefore, the remedy of revision 2 wp147.11 can be resorted to by him. I find that remedy more appropriate as some disputed issues arise for determination. Hence, with that liberty open to him, present Petition is disposed of. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 13.01.2011 gas/wp147.11