IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16511 of 2010 BABLOO KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 17.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The defence in a Police case under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code is of the F.I.R. being against unknown. The informant has named nearly 20 days later. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the petitioner is the assailant of the deceased, identified at 6:15 evening in the month of May, broad day light. The delay being explained by fire- arm injuries and hospitalization. Prayer for bail of his accomplice, seen running away from the place of occurrence, has been rejected in Cr. Misc. No. 24219 of 2009. The informant was also injured in the shoot out. This Court considers it sufficient. The prayer for bail is rejected. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)