IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.158 of 2011 SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH @ CHUNCHUN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner is that the respondents deserve to be directed to institute a F.I.R. against the respondent no.7 on the basis of the letter no. 3 dated 06.01.2010 issued from the office of the District Mines, Siwan under the signature of the Competent Authority-cum-Mines Inspector vide Annexure-3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner being a social worker has got right to claim that F.I.R. be instituted against the respondent no.7. It is further submitted that as a matter of fact the petitioner is harassed by implicating him in several false cases. Learned counsel for the State submits that the prayer of the petitioner that F.I.R. should be instituted on the basis of the letter of the Mines Inspector can not be agitated by the petitioner, if at all, it is for the Mines Inspector to look into the matter. Considering the submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to interfere into the matter. Accordingly the writ application being devoid of any merit stands dismissed. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)