HIGH SQLERT 9F GHéfEATTI$§ARH §§T EELf-kSFiiR $ingie Eeneh; Hen’§aie 33m Him Eattu, $J. Pe€i£iomer$ l“\ Rgsgandens Wait Pei'itimi Ne. 135’? OF 1§3§§K 1 . PD. Sharma, Sfa. Sm Rishi Dhar Shawna: Aged aboui 36 years, Senior Si%k impector: R/o. Rajendra Nagarx Disirict Bilaspur (MP) BL. Pate§, Sm. Shri KC Pateh aged about 32 ears; Senior Saies inspectcr, Through: Assi. Director (Siik) Katghora, District Bilaspur (MP) Laiit TiwarL S/o. 8hr P‘C. Tiwari aged about 35 yeara Senior SLR {mpecton Through: Asst‘r. Direcrars, (Siik), Ambikapur: Sarguja (MP) Iqbal Hus$aén. Sxbr Shri Ata Hussain, Aged about 34 yeara Senier SHk inspector, Through : Assit. Director (Silk) Dharm Jaygarh PG, Distt, Raégarh (MP) Sharad Khmar Pragpati: S/a, PM Prajapati; Aged about 3:1. years: C/o. Assit. Director (Silk)? Jagdaipur, Bastar. Jeewan Singh Rajput; S/o. Vishou Prasad Rajput, Aged about 35 years, Senior Siik inspector: C/or Asst”; Director (Siik) Ambikapur, S‘arguja. AK. Pandey, Slot RP. Pandey; Aged about 31 years, Senior Siik lnspeotor, Clo, Asstt. Director (Silk), Ambikapur, Sarguja. VS. x“ yo p3 The State of MP, Through: The Seeretaryg Forest Departmerrt, Bhopa‘i ( M. P.) The MP. State Textiie Corporation Ltd. F4; 24%, 5 A&C Gangotri Compiex: TT Nagarx Bhopal, Petition under Afiioie 226 of theQonstitution of indial §resen$ Shri Maoish Sharma, counsel for the petitiohers. Shri AS Kaohhawaha: GA torthe State/respondents. ‘ QRAL ORDER (Passed on 13*E Ami, 2m?) The petitioners claim that they are working m Sericufture Department. They are before this Court in this petition for a direction to the reepondents to assign them proper seniority in the list of seniority maintained Joy the respondents and aiso to pay them the pay—scaie fixed of the post in which they are working. (2) Before approaching this Court, the petitioners had not gone e the respondents, inter alia seeking redressai of their grievances, if any. in my View, before approaching this Court, the petitioners ought to have fiteoi an appropriate representation before the competent authority for redressai of aJi their grievances ineiuding the grievances, it any, so far as their service conditions are concerned. Therefore, in my View, the petitton iiied by the \ qc ‘g petitioners is whoiiy premature, (3) Accordingly, i decline to entertain this writ petition However, iiberty is granted to the petitioners to make appropriate representation before the competent authority for redressai of aii their grievances, if any. if and when r such representation is made, the competent authority wouid consider the same in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. /” sal— -:-¥ Chief Justice 7 r