IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.20115 OF 2009 DATE OF DECISION: MARCH 09 ,2011 Surinder Nath Seth .....Petitioner VERSUS Director, Local Bodies, Haryana, Chandigarh and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Harsh Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Patter, DAG, Haryana, for the State. Mr. Raman B. Garg, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. (ORAL) There is a dispute in regard to restoration of a full pension of the petitioner. The petitioner claims that he would be entitled to restoration of full pension after 12 years. The State, however, says that it will be available to him after 15 years as per option under the changed rules, additional commuted value of pension was paid to him subsequently. As per counsel for the petitioner, this subsequent amendment, which was initially introduced retrospectively, was made prospectively and the amount which was released to him, was not as an additional commuted value of pension. Counsel, thus, prays for permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one by placing on record the relevant documents to substantiate his plea. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. March 09,2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE