1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.450 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6800 OF 2011 Keroji s/o Sitaram Dasre .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. .. Respondents Mr A.P.Piratwad, Advocate for petitioner Mr K.J.Ghute Patil, A.G.P. for respondent No.1 Mr Murar Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.2 (appeared in Court) CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 23rd November 2011 PER COURT 1. Heard Mr Piratwad and Mr Deshpande for the parties. 2. Learned Counsel for respondent No.2 submits that the orders are complied with. However, there is little delay due to official hustles and not deliberate omission. Accepting above statement and the explanation offered by Mr Deshpande, the Contempt Petition is disposed of No costs. 3. Mr Deshpande submits that the officials concerned will consider representation of the petitioner for difference of salary for the particular period. ( K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. ) (vvr/450.11cp)