THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25291 of 2007 ORDER: Respondent No.2 is the owner of premises bearing No.5-4-232 of Maruthinagar within the limits of Karimnagar Municipal Corporation. On an application made by the petitioner herein that she purchased the said property through an unregistered sale deed, dated 06.12.1995, her name was entered in the municipal records from the year 2002 onwards by deleting the name of respondent No.2. It is also stated that the petitioner gifted the said property to her son in the year 2005. On coming to know that her name was deleted from the property register in respect of the said property, respondent No.2 filed a representation, dated 01.09.2007. Taking the same into account, the Municipal Corporation of Karimnagar, respondent No.1 herein, issued a notice, dated 01.11.2007, requiring the petitioner to submit requisite documents. The petitioner challenges the said notice. Heard Sri B.Vijaysen Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 and Sri M.Raja Malla Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.2. The petitioner based her claim on an unregistered document said to have been executed by respondent No.2. Even where the transfer takes place through a registered document, any mutation in the entries of the property register can take place only after notice is issued to the person in whose name the property is recorded. In the instant case, respondent No.1 did not issue any notice to respondent No.2 before replacing her name with that of the petitioner. Respondent No.2 submitted a representation feeling aggrieved by the change of entries in the property register. Respondent No.1 issued a notice to the petitioner to substantiate its case. It is not as if respondent No.1 is not vested with the power. Any authority, who passes an order, has the inherent power to issue notice to cancel the same if it is found that the same was procured through misrepresentation or by fraud. No exception can be taken to the impugned notice. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:18.03.2011. kdl