IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.WP No. 8601 of 2009. [O&M] Date of Decision: 17th August, 2011. Sohan Singh & Anr. Petitioners through Mr. Vikas Mahsempuri, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioners, who are working as Revenue Patwaris seek a direction for their promotion as Kanungos against the reserved points meant for Scheduled Caste category. Vide a supplementary affidavit dated 11.08.2011, the respondents have placed on record a self-declaration made by petitioner No. 1 [Annexure R-1] to the effect that he is a patient of sugar and blood pressure and does not want to be considered for promotion as Kanungo. The respondents have also placed on record the order dated 09.08.2010 [Annexure R-2] whereby petitioner No. 2 has been promoted as Kanungo. For the reasons afore-stated, the writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, however, with liberty to petitioner No. 2 to represent to the authorities if he is entitled to any other service benefits. Similarly, if the plea taken by the official respondents regarding petitioner No. 1 is incorrect, liberty is granted to him to seek revival of these proceedings. Disposed of. Dasti. August 17, 2011. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE