IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2011 / 2ND POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 34841 of 2011(E) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. RIYAS V.M., VAISHYAM VEETTIL HOUSE, KANOTH P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 510. 2. PAULSON J. CHEMMANOOR, CHEMANOOR HOUSE, PUVATHUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 508. BY ADVS. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SRI.MAHESH V.MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, TENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 001. 2. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, TENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 001. BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 34841/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 08/12/2011. P1(a):COPY OF APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 08/12/2011. P2: COPY OF CHALLAN REMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER FOR THE PRESCRIBED FEE OF RE-VALUATION DATED 02/12/2011. P2(a):COPY OF CHALLAN REMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER FOR THE PRESCRIBED FEE OF RE-VALUATION DATED 12/12/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).34841/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of some papers in the 3rd semester B.Tech Degree Examination and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs