In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. *** CR No.6653 of 2010 (O&M) Decided on 19.4.2011. Matu Ram Halwari --Petitioner vs. Rakesh Chand --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.R.K.Gupta,Advocate,for the petitioner Rakesh Kumar Jain,J: (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 1.2.2010 passed by learned Rent Controller, Kharar, by which an application filed under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure,1908 (for short,'CPC'), for staying the proceedings in the present eviction petition on the ground that the eviction petition filed by the father of the landlord is already pending in the High Court after admission in which he had also sought eviction on the ground of his personal necessity. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the eviction petition which was filed by the father of the landlord, ground of personal necessity was of his own, but after the death of his father, the son has filed the eviction petition seeking the demised premises for his own use and occupation. He states that in the earlier eviction petition filed by the father, there is no amendment sought by the son C.R.No.6653 of 2010 (O&M) -2- in order to set up his own case, rather he had only stepped into the shoes of his father being his legal heir in the petition filed by his father. Since cause of action in both the petitions is altogether different, therefore, there was no reason for the Court below to allow the application and there is no reason for me to disturb the impugned order. Hence, this revision petition stands dismissed in limine. 19.4.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge