IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 20527 of 2009 Between: Sri Prasannanjaneya Swamy Temple Committee, Rep. by its President N. Ashok, S/o. N. Lakshminarsaiah, Aged about 52 Years, Occ: Employee, R/o. Jawaharnagar Colony, Meerpet, Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue (Endowments) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Endowments, Hyderabad at Dharmika Bhavan, Boggulkunta, Hyderabad. 3 The Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Hyderabad at Dharmika Bhavan, Boggulkunta, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction preferably one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring action of the 1st respondent in not fixing the date of hearing and not passing of any interim orders in the Revision Petition filed by the Petitioner on 7-9- 2009 against the Proceedings in Rc.No. J2/38800/2007, dated 29-1- 2008 of the Respondent No.2 in publication of Sri Prasannanjaneya Swamy Temple situated at Jawaharnagar Colony, Meerpet, Malkajgiri Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and consequently direct the Respondent NO.1 to dispose of the Revision in the interests of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SRINIVASA MURTHY CHEEDELLA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : ORDER: - This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the 1st respondent in not fixing the date of hearing and not passing of any interim orders in the Revision Petition filed by the petitioner on 07.09.2009, against the proceedings in Rc.No.J2/38800/2007, dated 29.01.2008, of respondent No.2 in publication of Sri Prasannanjaneya Swamy Temple. Heard both sides. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that no date is fixed for hearing of revision petition and no interim orders have been passed therein. Therefore, the first respondent has to take appropriate decision in the revision petition itself. In stead of passing any interim orders, the first respondent can as well dispose of the main revision petition itself, which was filed against the orders dated 29.01.2008, by the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent to dispose of the revision petition filed by the petitioner on 07.09.2009 against the proceedings in Rc.No.J2/38800/2007, dated 29.01.2008, after giving opportunity to both the parties, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ (K.C.BHANU, J.) 24th September 2009 LMV