IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A.No.2178 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision 20.03.2009 Jagtar Singh ......Appellant VERSUS Murli Dhar ......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL. Present: Mr.Harbhajan Singh Dhandi, Advocate for the appellant. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J (ORAL): The trial Court decreed the suit of the plaintiff vide order dated 20.03.2006 for arrears of rent, however, did not decide issue No.3, framed by it. The appeal, preferred by the plaintiff, has also been dismissed. Now the appellant wants that decree, for recovery of rent w.e.f. December, 2000 till December 2003, when the possession was delivered to him, may be passed but the Court appears to have not considered the plea regarding arrears of rent on account of non-payment of Court fee. In these circumstances, this appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellant to file the suit for recovery of the arrears, obviously the limitation to file the suit shall begin to run from the decision of this appeal. March 20, 2009 (A.N.JINDAL) mamta-II JUDGE