IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OFAPRIL, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY WRIT PETITION No.25701 of 2007 Between: Smt. S.Rajeshwari. … Petitioner And The Station House Officer, Town III Police Station, Nizamabad and four others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Nandigam Krishna Rao. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home. This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction on the part of respondents 1 to 3 in conducting investigation and filing charge sheet in Crime No.168 of 2007; the action of respondent No.3 in not referring the petitioner’s complaint for independent investigation to a Police Officer other than respondents 1 and 2, as illegal and arbitrary; and to consequently direct respondents 3 to 5 to get Crime No.168 of 2007 investigated by CB CID Women Cell. At the hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted a copy of the final report dated 22-9-2007 filed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, III Town Police Station, Nizamabad before the learned Additional Judicial I Class Magistrate, Nizamabad, wherein he treated the case as false and requested the jurisdictional Magistrate to pass orders accordingly. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said final report, she is entitled to file a protest application before the jurisdictional Magistrate and she can persuade the learned Magistrate to take a different view in the matter. The Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate by filing a protest application. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 28-4-2008 MNR