IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12323 of 2008 SUNITA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 08.05.2008 Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner stating about the apprehension of arrest and bringing on record Annexure-5 whereby the co-accused Rukhiya Devi has been granted bail vide order dated 25.03.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 9046 of 2008. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Surajgarha P.S.Case No. 291 of 2007 registered under sections 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on perusal of the allegations levelled in the first information report, it would appear that the allegation is against one Rukhiya Devi and this petitioner and out of whom Rukhiya Devi has been granted bail. As such, this petitioner deserves to be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. Having considered the submissions and on perusal of the allegations levelled in the first information report as also taking into consideration the materials brought on record, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, Sunita Devi be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, - 2 - Ist Class, Lakhisarai, in connection with Surajgarha P.S.Case No. 291 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)