IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25635 of 2008 MEENA DEVI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioners : Mr. Vikram Deo Singh For the State : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, A.P.P. 2. 26/9/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are facing prosecution under Sections 323, 498A, 312 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner No. 1 is mother-in-law of the Complainant whereas petitioner No. 2 is maternal uncle of the Complainant’s husband. Submission is that there are no specific allegations against the petitioners rather there are specific allegations against husband and sister-in-law (Nanad) of the Complainant. Learned counsel for the State submits that there is allegation of torture and demand of dowry against all the accused persons including the petitioners. Having regards to the submissions made and the facts and circumstances of the case, let two petitioners namely, Meena Devi and Rakesh Thakur, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two - 2 - sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in Complaint Case No. 902 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. S.Ali (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)