:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 308 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO. 308 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO. 308 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 695 OF 1988 NO. 695 OF 1988 NO. 695 OF 1988 Yermal Jagannath Shetty & Anr. ... Plaintiffs. V/s. Ammibai w/o. Narayan Angarkar & Anr. ... Defendants. Mr. S.S. Ginsiwale for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Ananth Iyengar for Defendant No.2. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 10TH 10TH 10TH NOVEMBER 2008. NOVEMBER 2008. NOVEMBER 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . The earlier Advocate representing the Plaintiffs has expired and Mr. Ginsiwale is now appearing as Advocate for the Plaintiffs. He states that he has filed his Vakalatnama on 16th October 2008. Office to show the name of Mr. Ginsiwale as Advocate for the Plaintiffs and delete the name of Mr. S.M. Shetty. 2. Perused the Notice of Motion. It is for expediting the hearing of the Suit. The Plaintiffs claim to be the senior citizens. Hearing of the Suit is expedited. 3. In all fairness, Mr. Iyengar appearing for Defendant No.2 states that Defendant No.1 has expired and apart from Defendant No.2, there is another heir viz. Ms. :2: Kalpana D. Sawant. Mr. Iyengar states that he will provide the residential address of the said Kalpana D. Sawant to Mr. Ginsiwale within two weeks from today. After the address being provided, Mr. Ginsiwale to amend the plaint and implead the said Ms. Kalpana Sawant and Defendant No.2 in place of Defendant No.1 as her heir and legal representative. Amendment to be carried out within three weeks from the date the details are provided. 4. Post the Suit for framing of issues after four weeks. 5. The Motion is disposed off accordingly. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)