THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU and THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR Dated: 14-06-2011 WRIT APPEAL No. 393 OF 2011 Between: Rudraraju Padmavathi and another ... APPELLANTS AND Kosuri Venkatraju and two others …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU and THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL No. 393 OF 2011 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) On the basis of the permission favouring the respondent – writ petitioner, an order came to be passed placing a restraint upon the appellants and respondents 2 and 3 from interfering with the fishing activities of the writ petitioner, provided he has valid permission with liberty to the respondents – authorities to deal with him in accordance with law, in case any action against the permission granted in his favour is called for. Yet, the appellants – respondents 3 and 4 in the writ petition are aggrieved of the order on the ground that the order is prejudicial to their rights because the fishing activity is violative of their rights. We find no reason to interfere with the impugned order because of the fact that in case the appellants have any grievance against the permission, appropriate course for them is to invoke appropriate remedy. At this stage, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have already filed a writ petition. If that be so, it shall be disposed of uninfluenced by the order of the learned single Judge impugned herein. Disposed of. VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ 14-06-2011 K. Shyleshi