IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1618 of 2009 SHATRUDHAN THAKUR, S/o late Surendra Thakur of Vill. Russi Bareja, P.S. Ekma, District-Saran, Presently at Moh. Ratanpura, Habbib Jarrah Rd. H/O Ram Janam Rai, P.S. Bhagwan Bazar, Dist.Saran. Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 14.10.2009 Heard both the parties. Petitioner along with whole family members has been shown as tenant of the informant running a hair cutting salon. It is alleged that all the family members increased intimacy with the family members of the informant, as they were alleged to fetch water from inside the house and in that course, there was some affair with his two daughters. Ultimately, they taken away both girls and left the house. Though a defence is made that petitioner’s family was forcibly ousted from the house to justify the act. This allegation is levelled by filing the Complaint-cum-F.I.R. Moreover, love affair was only there but any allegation is not much clear as to who was more intimated with those girls. If the family members of the petitioner disappeared for un-known distance, his (petitioner’s) arrest from the house was not possible. Taking only what the girl denied but it is ultimately submitted that if the prosecution case is accepted then only it was a love affair with whom not known to the informant himself and no case at all is made out for his having come in association with any known criminal or his exposure to moral, physical and psychological danger or his release defeats the ends of justice which 2 also I agree, but it has not been considered by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as by the Sessions Judge and the petitioner remained in custody since 23.05.2009. Accordingly, the revision application is allowed. The order dated 07.10.2009 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 103 of 2009 by the 9th Addl. Sessions Judge, Saran and the order dated 26.08.2006 passed in J. Tr. No. 341 of 2009 by the learned Juvenile Justice Board, Saran are set aside. Let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Saran in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 116 of 2009 corresponding to J.Tr. No. 341 of 2009. However, one of the bailers shall be a close relative of the petitioner, who would undertake to keep the petitioner under his observation and produce whenever is required by the Juvenile Justice Board or Court. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)