HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.644 OF 2005 JUDGMENT: This Criminal Revision Case is preferred by the petitioner- accused against the judgment, dated 16.03.2005, rendered in Criminal Appeal No.760 of 2004 by the 1st Addl. Sessions Judge at Karimnagar. 2. The petitioner-accused was tried in S.C.No.760 of 2004 on the file of the 1st Addl. Sessions Judge at Karimnagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 342, 348, 323 IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of SCs & STs (POA) Act. After due trial, the learned Sessions Judge, convicted the petitioner under Section 235 (2) Cr.P.C. and accordingly sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 342 IPC, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months for the offence under Section 348 IPC, and further sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 323 IPC, while acquitting him of the offence punishable under Section 3(1)(x) of SCs & STs (POA) Act , vide judgment, dated 16.03.2005. Challenging the same, the petitioner preferred this revision. 3. Heard both sides. 4. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner by not pressing the main prayer confined his arguments to the extent of imposition of sentence and requested the Court to show some indulgence on the petitioner. 5. In view of the said submission and also the fact that the trial Court has given concurrent findings, this Court is of the view that merits of the prosecution case and the impugned judgment need not be adjudicated. 6. Admittedly, the case is of the year 2003 and for all these years the petitioner suffered humiliation. In these circumstances and in view of the fact that the petitioner has three daughters, this Court is inclined to show some lenience towards him. 7. Accordingly, the conviction recorded against the petitioner-accused by the trial Court for the offences punishable under Sections 342, 348 and 323 IPC is confirmed and the sentence of imprisonment is modified to that of the period already undergone by the petitioner-accused and the fine amount imposed by the trial Court is not interfered with. 8. In all other respects, the impugned judgment shall stand confirmed. 9. With the above modification, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. _________________ RAJA ELANGO, J 16th June, 2011 cbs HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.644 OF 2005 DATE: 16.06.2011 Between : Tallapalli Mallaiah … Petitioner/ Accused and State of A.P. … Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.644 of 2005 (Disposed of) 16th June, 2011 cbs