1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Ninth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.11876 of 2011 CHANDIRAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ODDANCHATIRAM, DINDIGUL DISTRICT IN CR.NO. 8 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.T. LENIN KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Addl.Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/A1 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 498(A) of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.8 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was already enlarged on anticipatory bail on 1.6.2011 for a period of three months, in order to facilitate the compromise between the parties. He further submits that even though he was appeared before the mediation centre, the de-facto complainant was not appeared before the mediation centre for compromise. He further submits that three months time has lapsed and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that already the petitioner was already enlarged on anticipatory bail for a period of three months and the matter is yet to be compromised. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that since the petitioner is the husband of the de- facto complainant, because of the matrimonial dispute, the complaint has been given by the de-facto complainant against this petitioner and the petitioner already been granted anticipatory bail for a period of three months in order to facilitate the compromise and as per the version of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 the learned counsel for the petitioner, the de-facto complainant was not appear before the mediation centre for compromise, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Oddanchatiram, Dindigul District and on execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 09/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ODDANCHATIRAM,DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,ODDANCHATIRAM, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/S.T. LENIN KUMAR Advocate SR.No.30660 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11876 of 2011 Date :09/09/2011 PA/12.09.2011/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/