IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 34391 of 2008(T) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- PHILIPOSE K.K., FORMER SECRETARY, PARAYAKAD C.V.C.S LTD. NO.A559, RESIDING AT KOCHUVEETTIL HOUSE, JAWAHAR NAGAR, KONTHURUTHY, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-13. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE ABRAHAM RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, PARAYAKAD C.V.C.S LTD. NO.A559, PARAYAKAD P.O., THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. THE COIR INSPECTOR, THURAVOOR, OFFICE OF THE COIR INSPECTOR, THURAVOOR P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 3. THE COIR PROJECT OFFICE, ALAPPUZHA, OFFICE OF THE COIR PROJECT OFFICE, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 4. THE DIRECTOR, COIR DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORATE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR FOR R2 TO R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Rs/ Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. ================================== W.P.(C)No.34391 of 2008 ================================== Dated this the 24th day of November, 2008. JUDGMENT Learned Government Pleader appears for respondents 2 to 3. In the nature of the direction being issued hereunder, notice to the first respondent is dispensed with preserving its right to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. 2. Petitioner states that he was employed with the first respondent society and demitted office on superannuation in 2004, however that, no retiral benefits and other dues except provident fund has been released to him. It appears that he has been repeatedly knocking the doors of the society. A person retiring from service has to get his dues at an early point of time, so that the retiral benefits can be effectively utilized for his future life. If the society is one that falls WPC34391/08 -:2:- into the pension scheme, petitioner has also to be extended such benefit, which may be available to him. For that, the society has to forward the pension papers through the competent authority. These social security measures cannot be denied or dragged on for too long. Under such circumstances, the third respondent is directed to hear the petitioner and the first respondent on the basis of this judgment, if necessary, after calling for a report from the second respondent and do the needful to ensure that the petitioner gets his retiral benefits and outstandings, if any, from the first respondent within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, sl. Judge.