IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2008 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(Crl.).No. 82 of 2008(S) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SHYJUMON.P.S., AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.S.PRABHAKARAN, RESIDING AT JIJU BHAVAN, VADAKKE JUNCTION, VILAPILSALA P.O., TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.K.SATHEESH KUMAR SRI.P.P.BIJU RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. K.RAVEENDRAN NADAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, THIRUVATHIRA, PERINGAMALA, KALLIYOOR P.O., VENGANOOR, TRIVANDRUM. 2. MOHANAN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BROTHER-IN-LAW OF IST RESPONDENT, KAKKAKUZHY VEEDU, NELLIVILA, NEYYATTINKARA. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BALARAMAPURAM. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.T.B.THANKAPPAN SRI.T.T.HARIKUMAR R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI C.M.KAMMAPPU THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/03/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.CRL.NO.82/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DTD. 12/12/2007. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SSLC CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE SSLC CERTIFICATE OF REMYA. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD. 28/2/2008 TO THE 3RD ` RESPONDENT. P.R.RAMAN & V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(Crl)NO.82 OF 2008 -------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of March, 2008 JUDGMENT Raman, J. Petitioner alleges that his fiancee by name Remya is under the illegal custody of her father and uncle, arrayed as respondents 1 and 2 in this writ petition. Pursuant to the notice issued, the alleged detenue appeared before us. We interacted with the alleged detenue. The alleged detenue submitted that she is a diploma holder in computer science, she is aged 21 years and her date of birth is 2/5/1987. She is in love with the petitioner. She stated that as and when they get a proper employment, they will decide to marry. Now she is with her parents and she is not under the illegal custody. We interacted with the father of the petitioner. He also supports what the alleged detenue is stated before us. In the circumstances, we close this matter. However, we direct that the alleged detenue shall not be compelled to marry anybody against her wish. P.R.RAMAN, Judge. V.K.MOHANAN, Judge. kcv.