IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 20513 of 2008 Between: S.M.Gulzar Begum W/o.Manohar R/o.CMR Colony,Kondapuram Town and Mandal Kadapa District ..... PETITIONER AND The Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) Galeru Nagari Sujala Sravanthi (GNSS), III Muddanur, Kadapa District .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not disposing oﬀ the petitioner representation dated 13.8.2008 as per the provisions of Land Acquisition Act 1894 as illegal, unjust,arbitrary,and against statutory provisions being violative of land Acquisition Act and consequently direct the respondent to dispose oﬀ the petitioner representation dated 13.8.2008 by referring the matter to the Civil Court as per section 30 of the Land Acquisiton Act 1894 in respect of the 3 houses bearing H.No.R.K.No.136,RK.1362,and RK 1363 situated in CMR colony,Kondapuram Town and Mandal,of Kadapa District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.L.J.VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 20513 of 2008 ORDER: A notiﬁcation under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (for short ‘the Act’) is said to have been issued on 04.10.2007, proposing to acquire various extents of land, including Ac.0.17 cents in C.M.R.Collony, Kondapuram Town, for the purpose of Galeru Nagari Sujala Sravanthi Project, Muddanur, Kadapa District. The respondent is designated as the Land Acquisition Oﬃcer. The petitioner is said to have submitted her claim on 13.08.2008, before the respondent. Her grievance is that the same is not being taken into account. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition. The claim made by the petitioner, if any, has to be taken into account, during the course of award enquiry. The Act does not provide for passing of individual orders on the claim petitions. At the most, they have to be taken into account, while passing the award under Section 11 of the Act. The petitioner cannot insist that the respondent shall pass separate order on her representation. It shall be open to her to participate in the award enquiry. If, even thereafter, her grievance subsists, she can pursue the remedy under Section 18 or 30 of the Act. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue the remedies, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 19.09.2008 JSU ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 20513 of 2008 Date: 19.09.2008 JSU