IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10797 of 2011 1. BIPIN KUMAR 2. GAUTAM KUMAR. 3. UTAM KUMAR. 4. RAJIV KUMAR. 5. RAJ KUMAR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the informant. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that the informant found the dead body of his father with injuries on the face and the chest. It is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. on suspicion of being in the company of victim prior to the occurrence. It is further submitted that after investigation, the accusation was found false and final form was submitted, but subsequently, differing with the same, the cognizance has been taken in the matter. Learned counsel for the informant submits that learned court below found ample material in the 2 case diary, which persuaded the learned court below to take cognizance. Considering the suspicious nature of accusation and the fact that the accusation was found false by the police, let the above named petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Ghosi P.S. Case No. 249/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)