1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.15806/2010 Smt. Barfi Devi & Ors. Vs. Board of Revenue & Ors. Date of order : 1/12/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri N.K. Maloo for the petitioners. ****** This writ petition seeks to challenge the order dated 29.07.2010 by which the application of the respondent no.12 to 15 has been accepted and they have been impleaded as party to the appeal filed by the petitioner, which is pending in the Board of Revenue. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the sale transaction made in their favour by father-in-law of the petitioner was hit by doctrine of lis pendente and that they are not party in the original suit and in the first appeal, therefore, the learned Board of Revenue has erred in law in impleading them as party. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the material on record, I find that those applicants have apparently purchased the share of father-in-law of the petitioner, who was party to the original suit and to the first appeal and therefore, they were unnecessary dragged into the issue. In the circumstances, the order passed 2 by the Board of Revenue does not suffer from any infirmity because all issues will have to be decided in the presences of those, whose case is likely to be adversely affected if matter is decided against them. The writ petition is therefore dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/-