THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.65 OF 2006 DATED: 16-07-2010 Between Vinod Kumar …Petitioner And 1.Peddapally Swamy. 2.State of A.P. rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad and another. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.65 OF 2006 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order, dated 29-12-2005, in Crl.M.P.No.137 of 2005, in Crl.A.No.11 of 2005, on the file of the VII Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Nizambad at Bodhan, whereunder and whereby the petition filed to adduce further evidence and mark the documents, was dismissed. 2. After considering the material on record, the Court below dismissed the above petition on the ground that the petition appears to have been filed only to drag on the proceedings and the accused who was examined himself as D.W.1 did not state anything about the existence of the document. Even the accused has not filed copy of the document along with the petition to receive the same as additional evidence. In the absence of any pleading and evidence, receiving of certain documents at the appellate stage cannot be allowed. No explanation is given by the accused for not filing those documents when criminal case is pending for about one year in the trial Court. Similarly, no explanation is given by the accused as to why those documents are relevant for the purpose of deciding the issue. Therefore, the impugned order need not be interfered with in view of the fact that it is passed upon proper appreciation of material on record. 3. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. In view of the fact that the appeal is of the year 2005, the appellate Court is directed to dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible. ------------------------------- JUSTICE K.C.BHANU DATED:16-07-2010 Hsd