ft/Q . FiWtodiy Shri. -^- •^..'5'kswfSf^ for ^egist s Sfate *<!m. Tribunal. R^lfUR. IS THB NADBTA PKABSSB ABHINISTBAT IVS TaXHIIU.L a;NGB A3- a&IPCR (M.E.) .A. Ko.. L,p^)^^ s: 1999 AppUCANT, ; Narayan Prasad Tivari Spo of AdjAya prasad Tl^ari aged abeat 58 r years, resideat of Torn - Pandarlya i Tab. Paadrtya, Distt.Kawardfaa (M.P.) i SSESSX il RESpmiaittS^ s State of Madbya Pradesb ! Tbrough - Secretary, Co-opsi-ative | B&paptnaat, Bfaopal , ] 2, Joint Director, Go-opsrative Bepartment i Bilaspur Division, Biiagpar. [ ApPLICAncaiI mBsa^SBCTION 1q GF THS.ADiaHISrafci'I'gs. i TaiBUtia.L ACT_ ^_Q&5_^ ^ ? •m I't.lKilli ^; '- ,•' ';' •r_^^ ii>t::.-.<ik!*":lt-—" 3WS!^[1^IW 'T'naT^T'afflw ^ •g^ 'aTqRT'!, ^ftWT^, ^dH^ .^i^.yJ.^ sn^i traq; (^33^) SB: Hon'ble ShriJVIanindra Mohan Shrivastava, J 13.04.2010 Shri Nikhil Tiwari, counj Shri Chandresh Syrivastava State/respondents. p^tit By this petition, the account of action of responder^ts vide order dated 21.1.1998 (A^inexu Petitioner has averred ija appeal/representation agains^ been decided. On the conta-ary, res no appeal as stated by the Taking into consideraticjn penalty was imposed on the) pending and also that this p^ dated 21.1.1998, I think it 4?oul justice to allow the petitioner) appropriate appellate auth@|rity (Classification, Conta-ol 85 Appe^l) tft'l^fd^-l ^T^f -^'t^t <{at^R i?<iifOTS^I el for the petitioner. Panel Lawyer for the itioner has ventilated his grievance on by which his sei-vices were terminated aexure A-14). the petition that he had preferred an the said order, but the same has not pon^ients have submitted in their return that pet^tioner has been preferred. that by the impugned order, a rnajor petitioner and fhis petition remained stition was filed after issuance of order 4?ould be appropriate -in the interest of to pursue his remedy of appeal before under M.P./C.Q. Civil Services Rules, 1966. •"•^•b.,"%. ^1|XI-HC-22; 'svf -syssv^, ri'al'yiri, 1^'rrray s^ ~"Rn<S-^; »nwiTsh-qrai "HT: 200 sn^i'sn 'f^'ra'sn^T ^-ii^ ^I?^ sn^f ^B'IW ^riN i- CSi|^<vl41l ^I^^II'^IT'^ <!'3!^i< '^;3:[^Tlt3IR^ Praveen This petition is accordiijigl the petitioner to prefer an app^al a period of 3 rnonths from the| such appeal being preferred, decide the same as expeditious of 3 months from the date of r^ceipf igly finally disposed of giving liberty to before the competent authority within date of receipt of copy of this order. On respondents/competent authority shall .ly as possible preferably within a period of appeal, if any. ^oba*t Ma^dta^d&e g^civa'sta^a [Tft®••tf's';