IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2008 / 17TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 19449 of 2008(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ OOMMEN JOHN, MENAKKIL PUTHEN VEEDU, PANAYAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.SANIL KUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, O/O COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. KOLLAM. 2. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) RAILWAYS NO.II PAYIKKADA ROAD, KOLLAM. BY G.P. SRI.BASANTH BALAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 19449 of 2008 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of July , 2008 JUDGMENT The learned Government Pleader has not been able to get instructions from the 2nd respondent regarding the status of Ext.P2. Under the above circumstances, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition issuing the following directions; i). The second respondent will verify his records and if such verification reveals that Ext.P2 application is even now pending with him, he will take decision on Ext.P2 and communicate the same to the petitioner. This he will do within one month of receiving a copy of this judgment. ii). If the records reveal that Ext.P2 has already been decided or if it is revealed that Ext.P2 has not been received at all, the second respondent will either forward a copy of the decision taken on Ext.P2 or inform the petitioner regarding the non receipt of Ext.P2. This the second respondent will do within the same time frame. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE dpk