Civil Revision No.4718 of 2008 [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.4718 of 2008 Decided on : May 05, 2009 Joginder Kaur ... Petitioner VERSUS Sneh Lata and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Robin Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.G.C.Shahpuri, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 6. A.N.JINDAL, J.- The objector is a purchaser of the property after the award for a sum of Rs.2,98,000/- along with interest passed in favour of the respondents – decree-holders on 28.2.2004. The objector by purchasing the property on 21.10.2005 cannot defeat the award, which could well be executed against the property, which he had subsequently purchased. As regards the objection with regard to the issuing of the certificate under Section 174 of the Motor Vehicles Act, there is no dispute regarding the fact that as per Section 174 of the Act, if any amount is due from any person under an award, the Claims Tribunal could issue a certificate for Civil Revision No.4718 of 2008 [ 2 ] the amount to the Collector, who was to proceed to recover the same as arrears of land revenue. This provision does not deprive the Claims Tribunal of the powers of its execution, but only places an obligation to forward a certificate for recovering the amount as arrears of land revenue. In the circumstances, the instant petition is dismissed with the modification in the impugned order dated 6.8.2008 (Annexure P-6) that the Claims Tribunal would get the amount recovered from the judgment debtor, by issuing a certificate in accordance with law. May 05, 2009 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE