fc. ^; INTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION(S)No25>83> QF 2010 PETITIONER Dilip Chandrakar, Aged about 52 years, S/o Shri P.N.Chandrakar, Occupation - Service, Working as Inspector of Police, Crime Squad, Janjgir, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh .<i» RESPONDENTS ^y-y^ '^^"'^ ^:\<y^ ^••^^^ ..•-"^'\^" ^•{\~/1^^''' ^•"" .^' ^a" <8?' V E R S U S 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Home (Police), DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh f.Director General of Police, Police Headquarters, Raipur, Chhattisgarh -?''^. . • 3. Chairman, State Police Establishment Board, Police Headquarters, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Inspector General 6f Police (Administration), Police Headquarters, Raipur, Chhattisgarh /' 5. Superintendent of Poliee, District Janjgir - Champa, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OFAWRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS.DIRECTION ORDIRECTIONS.ORDERORORDERSOR THE LIKE inil saiK.ii lsl'l ^ltftt" aEs^-^ « is- : <: fflGH^©HR®(aE(3 iA!]ms©SRB.^',BI&i<iSI>I^ :''9^I','EETl'HON/®J3o..23'83?6£20IO^.^.'.'^ .•':'-EElTI301'^..;::.;^:^Daip,GUandrakar':.:^ :VERSUS..-:::::-:.';T.:^:;i.^'^';.^ RBSP6NDENTS :;State:(fChiiaffisearh^:Offi WTRITI^ITllM'tINBEill.A&M^^ :';^.--.-^^:^?MBB® g§affi^lsli^^^^ 1'reSent: • 'i' r;5hri RfliibitSiiJgKiKIar]^ A^ '<:^:T.:::;.i;i®ShriW%pao^^ ^^';EEtwyei'^^?{lies§^te.,^^::::•.; l':'^'./:''.':^:^,^:;:..::,;':'::,..i,^ ,:.^?:aiaBB@Rffit^::^':';:'::,:-';:;.;;^^ ^•.,:(Passeai)tt|0%aay%J|tay^aO^ By. this^petition,;thefpei3lioiteE{see^ 7/I1/20Q9 (Aariexurc P-1), wUereby jthe^pe^ theP(^K»Depajim^aud^ostetf,at^D^ District.Dantewada. :;;;:;':.'-''••:';.:,'',1.: ::;.i; .:.: ^1' ^'; -•:/: 'l:''\::;'::''^:v''';li" The,fa(^.m;M^as^]^ei^d|^ffiea|jetit^^ .fh&.Mliee DeparyHenlKOn^Hl^^^ Bilasptu':'Distriet;at'^^oiis^<^ceSSfaft6^ varicnis disfficfs:viz.^^Surguja,']?urg,Kajn^^ 2009; tl^^etitionerwa&servingat^D^ ^ide'ftKe m!pugned;;(xdeptBe:'®etitioner,v%s^ present.®e.petition^^ is aged;ab<^^^ Irarisferred Ib a NaXalite^aftect^'area^M varkius ' ailments. Thus, iDQking to ,?the,,aforesaiS| .facts sanil .sittiation,^ llie impugned^ti^sferorder'may.fee'Ganceyed/^.!:'.'; ::.^ I.;have heard•leamed.oouasel'iap^arffi^ 'pleadings :and:::doi:^MBBnB:'appeIi8ed;tUeret6.^'^ SUri.Mborthy, teamed ecmflsel^appearaig?^^ fhat the, petitioner.:yas''e^Uer'® 6780%Q09 ^ich was^disBiissed'aSy's^^ 'pending/r^resentation'.;0n%l;9;1^2HCl9y/(.^^ petltione^agamfiled.a.^)^^iti(miteei^^^;(^^ (pashing ofltUe.gaffle.transj^order;^ ^ aiso dismisseU: M^wiXhiicsey^ \viSs{ Se^^^^^^^ ^ffesIrS|S®@B^jffii ^ll •iss tWS ¥' <-• <- 6. 29.032010 (AnnexureP/7).Bc thepetitionswere.a^ :which':is:sought.tQ:;B^impugtte(l^Uerein.:^ •.:,.,:. ;: . ^:: '':'.:'^^;,:..:''^'^ Qn'periBal, it is found ffiat.^^ transfer order i.e. order.3ated 7.11.2009{on the satte grcro^ disimssed^ as withdravTO: without^^ .pres^petiticft.i&not^ainfaiiia.ble. ..'•... ^?...^^.:'^;^::.}''^''^^:';'.^ Law,on^the.point;is-weU:seftled.In^SargujaTra^^ Ti^s][ Wl^ppi|lla^^l[^ib^ witHi;H^atpQf';ffie^earlier.\^ seeKi^,,liBer1y lQ^lfi^3T^.wHt:jpetition^:^ !S8'?of 1986)?was Sle3yl1:he; glt7©0uS filed fbr;ttie.same causes£a<^c^ ^s^notwithidiawnWitbpenmsMEUtoBlea'i^ Court:heldas'utider::'; :"": ••' 1:; :;:. ^: ^ • ;•'.,. .•:..,'.:,. ^.,'^'.:,..^.:^ "5.]lrthisGase;wearecalIeduBoriqo,cor^ Ifhe effectofihe^withdi^al Offhe'writ'p^ ; fiIed:uriderArticIes226/227'ci£thsG:onstituti6fl' of India: w&houf tha^permissicm- of ffie HigU^ ;' ; Gcmrt fo;£leafresh^etitio^ the Gpde:ofeNtProcedur^l9ffl8'9i^ma^ : refefted1 to as •'fhe :Goae') .we ^ncrt^^ . applicabletofthewiit?pt®ceediflgs^^^ prQeedurept^(^?4ffi^^as N^it cante • made appBcabl^;is IblloweS'by'tUe High Gourt^ ..ffldi^osmgDfthewTitFetitibn^' ^ ^ 7. .....TNlaw confersupon amannciriglltsdr beiiBfits which he does ,nof. desire. 'Whoever w^es,aband<®<a;<lisGlaimsanght^ k.InordeTfQpreventalitigaMfrt^abusmgth&^^^^^^ ' ^process of^ ccnW ^d agam'oaf&e sanie eause'of.aBticai^W 'aiiygaod;reason;llie'Gc 'msi^:lthat^:sB<^d^^^^^ Wtam'fhepernussioffof'tliecourt^ :Suit.'' , • :: :'': :::. r • : ;.: '.,.:;l;,,;:.';.j,:1?:;],^ 8. ..JtiscQmmonkMcWlefigefhat'yery.cffien,' after a writ petitioii is heard.fb^spm&tinieiwlieny^ .' ' fliepetkiQnerorhiseounseliiBdsthaffhe^^ ; is ilot ^likely to pass •anv. oider^adiBitting^lte,'':. .^/ ^;; •^ .\. petition^request is imde byillie'^etitrc^ ^ .' ;^^ ^ ff(^^.tUef^^it,]x^ioff^^withQUt'^^ peimission to mstitute a.fK!Sh^t ^etiti6n..i^ 3. •-^?7R-' • ' ..Cdurt^ich^is.unwiUmgtoa^ wouldriQt^rdul^ly'graatlibe^ petition while it may'just^agree withdrawal oEthe petiticm-If is.plam tBat^^^ - once a wi^ ^ition^^^ffl WtHdrawfl By the.'petitionCT ^preeluded ftom iiling aay'a^ order RasseC,m,Ae'wHt petitiofl^ , Garmot.be-cc^idere4^a:party.;aggrieN .theQrder.passedbytheHigh Gourt." • ., . ^ 7. ^on'ble Supisme CoiirtmAvinasteN 'aild'athiers 'held;:as under; ::. ;:: • ':^. '• . .^:". .: . : ' .;''.'::^, ;^;'l..':i :'l:;:i';'^ "13. •. MeMigh eoilrt'also:was'nghf'm^ conclusicmithat^e' secoad \vnt'^etition;;is;ltot^^ fiiaiffltantaBle as fhe pnnctple of coristructive rey^ •;.; ^ judicafavm^.afip[y.^:Gled^:^ fetitis^ : iri first mstanee but withdrewthe same wito peiffiission ofthe Gourt with.llbetty t6 Hle the^^^ secoM writ petitioii v^i& Therefore, the second 'writ petiticm K maintdinaBle as hel9' by the High Gc)urt^m%^%':,g^ applymg. the coasGf.principle ;of:la^ ^ ^ considered.weilmd^no menf in^Ke a^eal^ ::hlterf^fice.w.^....:;^l:^',:y':<^''"^ 8. Bi view'of.tU&abm^e'settled^position^lawy were fileA by tBe petitioneF before^^^ aGfKm,'fbrthesame;reliefifbrv^icUthe^^m this Court, and the same were not withdrawn witH.lA . p^iti<m.biefbre th^ "fflaintainable.' , :' ' ' • :,. '':.' !' • : l',:.:; .^,.; •:::? '''';';^ 9.Thus,thiswritpetitionisdismissedasDpfniaihtainabIe. 10. 'NoorderaSto.cQsts. - . • ' Sd/- . AsUok ^sbt^ Aotn Bll (1997) 2 SGC 534