IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.11635 of 2010 RAMASHRAY CHOUDHARY, Son of Lakhan Chaudhary Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 06.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 376, 511, 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleged that petitioner caught his daughter in a maize field and was trying to commit rape but some how she got saved, as villagers intervened. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no case under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code is made out rather case under Section 376/511 of the Indian Penal Code is made out. He further submits that it would appear from the First Information Report that his mother had filed a case against the prosecution side. He further submits that the complaint case was filed after 13 days of the occurrence. The petitioner is in custody since 06.01.2010. Counsel for the State submits that after Panchayati petitioner was directed to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- to the informant and, as such, there was delay in filing the instant case. This case is of the year 2000 and the petitioner is named in the First Information Report, still he surrendered on 06.01.2010. - 2 - In the circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after seven months. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)