1 (crim wp 1236 of 2010) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1236 OF 2010 Deepak Khandelwal and Anr. ...Petitioners Vs. M/s. Shreeji Finvest Limited and Anr. ...Respondents ----- Mr.R.D.Suryawanshi for Petitioners Mr.P.C.Jhunjhunwala-Shreeji Finvest Pvt. Ltd. Respondent No.1 present in person Mr.A.S. Shitole -APP for the State ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2010 P.C. 1. Both the parties have amicably resolved the dispute. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 27 th April, 2010, the Petitioners have deposited an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- in this Court today. He has given two demand drafts for an amount of Rs.75,000/- each being Demand Draft No.429494 dated 9.9.2010 drawn on State Bank of Patiala, SBP Service Branch, Mumbai and Demand Draft No.30956 dated 3.9.2010 drawn on Axis Bank, to the Respondent No.1, who is appearing in person. 2. The Respondent No.1 has accepted the said demand 2 (crim wp 1236 of 2010) drafts and has stated that the amount deposited by the Petitioner in this Court may be permitted to be withdrawn by him. He has submitted that in the application the name of the Respondent No.1 is wrongly mentioned as M/s.Shreeji Finvest Limited instead of M/s. Shreeji Finvest Pvt. Ltd. He submitted that the office may be directed to pay the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- to M/s. Shreeji Finvest Pvt. Ltd. He also submitted that he has no objection if the complaint is quashed. 3. Hence, in view of the settlement between the parties, the criminal case No.191/M/1999 filed by the Respondent No.1 in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, 16 th Court, Bellard Pier, Mumbai is quashed and set aside. The Respondent No.1 may file an application through its director for withdrawal of the amount deposited the Petitioners herein. The office may pay the said amount to the director of M/s. Shreeji Finvest Pvt. Ltd. expeditiously. The Petitioners shall appear before the Jaipur Court from where the summons has been issued. The Petitioners are being instructed by Ashok Jeevan Sharma, advocate who is present in the Court. (V.M. KANADE J.)