IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 887 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 887 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 887 OF 2008 Vijay Vasantlal Kataria. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Niranjan Mundargi i/b. Ms.Bhakti Deshpande for the applicant. Ms.P.P.Shinde, A.P.P. for the State. Mihir Gheewala for the complainant. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 6th May 2008. DATED: 6th May 2008. DATED: 6th May 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the original complainant and learned A.P.P. for the State. Perused record. 2. By this application under section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with C.R.No.I-84/2008 registered with Navin Panvel Police Station for the offence punishable under section 406 of Indian Penal Code on the basis of complaint filed by one Chetan Indravadan Oza. 3. Having seen the documents available on record at pages 43 to 61 followed by the bills issued by the present applicant- accused at pages 63 to 65 and letter dated 15th October, 2007 filed by the complainant prima facie implicate him with the offence alleged. The privity of contract with the complainant can be spelt out on the basis of these documents. Considering the documents, prima facie, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail, especially, when the investigation is at the preliminary stage. 4. The application is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE