SS SHE H2©He®tiW®F•roBWftl'CT®A$ BI6ASIVR (e.@.) (jRIT VBWSSB8 S@. <3(36 2®@2 BamaltaBt Krasad eq?ta ^o ffltaa Brasad ,age<3 about 42 years»! Besidentof ©ldBas Stand*-,»nbikapua?, ®»soughAtstosaey HBlder aadba KE'lsbB %'asad Q»pti ?/e ShanlEer Bayal Braaad^ aged 30 yeaES, BasAdent ee ©ldttis Sty»d Apb4kapur Distrle't sarguja (es>. <2«<*.^w-e^v PEa*XT3©NER a,«N.B v^^\ ^.--1, af 3S ?<the Sfeafee o£ Oiha'b'feisgaffh, Tbsee^gb the Secretiairy BttpartaBerit 06 'Eranspert; B.K.s.Buildlng, Bsipur, sahsil aad Btstrlet leipue' (es). The Addxtlonal Reglenal sransport CCfieer/ Taxatlon Au'tbority AabikapUFf Blstriet Sargruja (e@). The Transpert atospee'feor, R SUXSHX Barrier aBBgalpall sistsieb Balgaali? \«s ^hie ©3U©cl£Gr Saa?guja<i Bistrte'fe Sarguja (es). aESSOHDffiTS -«<•'" BBa SE'ff.TieSS OHDER AKTaBLES 226/227 OF SHE BWSWCW;tW WS'9SS6SS' iiffli •>^. Stfet^f fefesft? ifetti*' S.s.,.^ . . ^^ ;;^^i^^. 10 ^^?^^^^i^a^l:^^'^^^^^^^^@;^^^':^i;^^^%^§^%^^^^^i^^l^ $:;.:;^'^^S^^^^S^%^®^^&'S^^;;^^^:^?i^:^^L:':^^^ SSSSxSSS^SS l|(tBffSS»*tP» 3{ter SBtlW tlferi Shri Prashont Mishra. cour^sel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, !3-jaiS22' 2oe •*l<ife<!(-tW*wF'^fe><tE*R>**l<. '^3rf:a*?<ni^ sputy Adtyocate Seneral takes notjce for -rfie respondents. Heard both the counsel. The petitioner has in this petition sought for quoshing of the seizure of the vehicle namely bu^ bearing registration No.CTL 9013 /Annexure P-1 and direct the rti records of the case for pemsal ^ dated 28.03.2002 - Annexure P-1 espondents to produce the entire f this Court and quashin9 the order 10 passed by the respondent No.3. The vehicle was seized for plying w|ithout permit. Learned counsel for the re^pondents submitted ttiat as against thte order - Annexure P-10 passed] by the respondent No.3, the appeal Appellate Authority, Ra|)ur". regard to the facts jand circumstances of the case, jt is appropriate to releose the afcjresaid vehicle in favour of the petitioner, subject to the petitiorjer's depositing 50% of -rfie amount demanded in Annexure P-10 and d^ect the petitioner to file an appeal against Annexure P-10 before the Appetlate Authority. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. The respondent No.3 is c|rected to release the aforesaid vehicle bearmg registration No.CIl^ 9013 in favoyrof the petitioner itBirat :Lji.-£~li^-^<; ••iSift-SsiSitjiiilU^S^V ^^ {, 'a^t'OTS, iiiwi'ay :3fV:!S lN?a'3n§?f ^TT^"?H?fl Soma kSSf^^^ l^.f.U^. TD^;T-062_. <iii^['RaiwHit3 u ^pfeiN-WRtf •?festttoSK ^-2Bpgii aiii% and the petitioner is directed t| Annexure P-10 within one further directed to opproach order dated 28.03.2002 - No.3 is concemed within 10 days| If the oppeal is filed b^ Annexure P-10 before the Authority would dispose of mohth the Ann^xure poiy half of the amount mentioned in from today. The petitioner is Appellate Authority so far as the P-10 passed by the respondent |from today. the petitioner a9ainst the order - ^ppellate Authority, the Appetlate same without reference to the the In view of this order, atl -the opplications and the petition stand Parties are entitled for ce^tified copy of this order. Sd/- ChiefJustice nrii