s.( INStEBEII c^\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CNHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION fS) N0. ^/ /2007 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER /y/ Chintamani Tiwari (B.Ed.), aged about 43 years, son of Shri Ishwar Tiwari, Assistant Teacher, lf^./^^i''' (Presently working as U.D.T.) ^L^'y Government Tribal Boys Higher Secondary School - Kusmi, Tahsil - Kusmi, Distt. Surguja (CG) ^y./ (N.y:;';?/-^'' ^•'•s. :i^ ^ <<< RESPONDENTS ^l. 2. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Departmentof Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Deptt of Tribal Welfare, Surguja (CG) Block Education Officer Kusmi, Distt. Surguja (CG) XI-HC-78 sn^rwf^fw tiwsn^raOTra ^.. Sablu ^ HTH^II Strqrei TSffWv^f, aifl'H'is, Riciiyy ^-..W:!-S^(1:.GS:}^ 2007 3<i^i?i 4ato ('iydj'sKysT) ?Rnwfff?H3n^T 1.2.2007 Mr. Ranjeet Kumar M.az^inndar, counsel for the petitioners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel If^wyer for Ihe respondent$/5tate. With the consent of !ed heard finafly and disposed of. Common order dictatecf in W.P. (s) No. 621 of 2007 in open Court, sassed %parately. A copy of this order be, »bi<iF«<fl-<*<i*iciTffteIA<Rf't<ii< ^isif^Tsn^r rned counsel for the parties. the matters are pfaced on record in connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge P.T.O. HI6H COURT OF CHH/tTTTSfeSRH^AF BIUSPU8 SIN61E BENCH ; HON'BLE MR. S^TISH K. A6NWOTRI. J. WRTT PETn~roN(s) NO. 621 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Responctents Chintamani Tiwari Stateof Chhatt-isgarh cnd others WRTT PETmON ts) NQ^^ZOF 2QQ7 Petitioner Resoondents versus famari Kamfa Kerketta State of Chhattisgarh and others WRTT PETmON (s) N0^6210^2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents 5.R. Nirala 5tate of Chhattisgarh and others And WRir PETTTrON (s) |SLQ_624^F 2007 Petjtioner versus Resoondents Nagesh Kumar Rathia State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mazumdar, counsel for the petitioners. Ms. 5unita Jajn, Panel tawyer for the STate/ reqsondenrs, OR D E R (Passed on Ihis Ist February. 2007} 1. Leamed counsel cppear'mg for the petitioners as well as leamed . f'" Penal lawyer appearing for the respondents/Stat®jointly .submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ peti+ion are squarely covered by the decision of this Court- in the case of yasfweHvt Kumar Bhafwdwaj vs. Mwricipal Corpwatim. Ouny tmd aiwthw>'. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of tiie decision of this Court in the matter of yashwanf Kumar BhafvdwaJ(5u^ra}, subject to verification of the fact asto whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.I. Certificates at •riieir own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further wrfiether tiiey have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be ptacecl on re.cord m connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatisbK.Agmhotri Judge 1 2006CtI)MPJR-C696 Bablu