IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6473 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: January 20, 2011. Mangat Singh ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus Diwan Singh ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. S.P.Soi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate for the respondent. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside impugned order dated 24.09.2009, Annexure P7 vide which learned trial Court allowed the application for ad- interim injunction filed by respondent-plaintiff on the basis of agreement to sell in his favour and order dated 10.08.2010, Annexure P9 vide which appeal filed by the present petitioner-defendant against the said order was dismissed. CR No.6473 of 2010 I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record including the impugned orders passed by both the Courts below. A coordinate Bench of this Court while issuing notice of motion on 05.10.2010 had directed both the parties to maintain status quo qua possession and nature of the property in dispute during pendency of the suit. It has been stated by learned counsel for the respondent-plaintiff that he is having no objection if the impugned orders passed by learned trial Court as well as by learned appellate Court are modified to the extent that both the parties be directed to maintain status quo qua possession and nature of the property in dispute during the pendency of the present suit. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also stated that his petition may be disposed of accordingly. Hence, in view of the statement of learned counsel for both the parties, the present revision petition is disposed of with direction to both the parties to maintain status quo qua possession and nature of the property in dispute during pendency of the suit and the impugned orders passed by both the courts below are modified to that extent. However, it is made clear that that nothing observed herein shall be having any bearing on the decision of this case on merit by learned trial Court. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) January 20, 2011. JUDGE 'om' 2