1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 735/2008 (Sanjay Rambhau Wankhade & another VERSUS Raju Nagosa Kalane & another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : JULY 28, 2008. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. It is brought to the notice of the Court that this Court had recorded in the last paragraph of the order dated 16.04.2008 that since the counsel for the respondent had made a solemn statement on behalf of the respondent that the respondents are forever willing to permit the petitioner to work on the post of the peon, the contempt petition was liable to be disposed of. According to the counsel for the applicant, the petitioner Raju Kalhane in Contempt Petition No.142/2007 is under the impression that the aforesaid statement would mean that the respondents would be willing to permit the petitioner to work on the post of peon forever and not only during the pendency of Writ Petition No.5382/2004. 2 It is, therefore, necessary to clarify the statement recorded in the last part of the order dated 16.04.2008 of which review is sought. While recording that the respondents were forever willing to permit the petitioner to work on the post of peon, this Court intended that the respondents were ready and willing to permit the petitioner to work on the post of peon till Writ Petition No.5382/2004 was finally decided. In fact, such an observation finds place in the third last paragraph of the order dated 16.04.2008. It is, therefore, clarified that the counsel for the respondents had made a statement that the respondents would permit the petitioner to work on the post of peon only till Writ Petition No.5382/2004 was finally decided by this Court. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. JUDGE APTE