IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37684 of 2010 TAPESHWAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 19.1.2011 Heard. This Court’s order dated 27.10.2010 has fructified to some extent as the carbon copy of the post-mortem examination report was brought on record by examining Dr.Vikash Chandra Chaudhary, P.W.7, by the learned trial Judge, in Sessions Trial No. 1015 of 2005. The learned Judge has reported by his letter appearing at Flag ‘A’ that the above noted order of this Court passed in this petition was forwarded to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna and Superintendent of Police, Rural, Patna for production of the Investigating Officers of above noted Sessions Trial arising out of Pandarak P.S.Case No. 24 of 2004 but the I.Os. have not been produced for recording their evidence. It is regularly being reported by different trial Judges that the police of the State, and in most of the cases the Superintendents of Police of different Districts, are either not minding their business and valuing the orders either of this Court or of the trial court on production of the I.Os. That probably appears the commentary on functioning of the police as regards the prosecution of cases by production of the witnesses. The Government of the day can never boast of dispensing justice unless it puts on alert its police force to mind its business under the Cr. P.C., specially, that created by Section 170(2) Cr. P.C. 2 as also the judgment of the Supreme Court in Shailendra Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in A.I.R. 2002 S.C. 270. This Court is simply disturbed to find that even the orders of this Court dated 27.10.2010 which was forwarded by the learned trial Judge to two Officers of the Police Department has not been give due respect by them. This is a clear case in which a case for filing a complaint for disrupting the criminal trial before a particular court could have been directed. But, that will increase the burden on the lower court and may not be fruitful. It is better that the Registry of this Court should send a copy of this order to the Director General of Police, Bihar, for information as also copies of the same be sent to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna, and Superintendent of Police, Rural, Patna for information that in case the I.Os. of Pandarak P.S.Case No. 24 of 2004 are not produced in the trial court, i.e., Additional Sessions Judge-I,Barh, Patna in Sessions Trial No. 1015 of 2005 in one month’s time for recording their evidence, so that the trial is concluded in two months from the date of receipt/production of the copy of the present order before the learned trial Judge, the learned trial Judge shall release the petitioner on bail in the above noted case on furnishing a bond to his own satisfaction. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)