IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO. 3365 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO. 3365 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO. 3365 OF 2008 Mahendra Vishwanath Kauchale, .. Applicant. Vs State of Maharashtra, .. Respondent. Mr D.V.Sutar, for the applicant. Ms A.T.Javeri, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 08/10/2008 DATE : 08/10/2008 DATE : 08/10/2008 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard Mr.Sutar, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms.Javeri, learned APP, for the State. 2. The applicant has prayed for bail in C.R.No.431 of 2008 of Yerawada Police Station. The said crime has been registered against the applicant for having committed an offence punishable under sections 408,420,467,468 and 471 of IPC. It is on the allegations that the applicant while working as Assistant Manager (HR) with Raj Maker Rojix Company, committed misappropriation of an amount of Rs.31,500/- during the period from 10.7.2008 to 31.7.2008. FIR came to be lodged on 9.8.2008. Considering the nature of allegations against the applicant and overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. 3. The applicant be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.35,000/-, with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to the following conditions: that the applicant shall report to the concerned police station every Saturday between 10 and 11 am till filing of the chargesheet and thereafter on 1st Saturday of every month for a period of six months. . While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case without being influenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)