IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5302 of 2007 Santosh Kumar Pandey son of Sri Parduman Pandey, residing in Radha Raman Sanskrit Uchacha Vidyalaya Campus, Deena Shaha Lane, Mundichak, P.S. Kathali, District Bhagalpur … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Secretary Law, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 2. District and Sessions Judge, Saharsa .. Respondents ---------------------------------- For the Petitioner :Mr. Sourendra Pandey, Advocate For the Respondents :Mr. Nikesh Kumar, AC to S.C.-20 02/ 03.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. None appears for the District and Sessions Judge, Saharsa, as the copy of the writ petition has not been served on the counsel for the High Court. 2. Petitioner was an applicant for the post of Process Server in the judgeship of Saharsa. He was selected for appointment as Process Server under order No. 41/N, bearing Memo No. 3130-31 dated 10.10.2002, Annexure-3 and was directed to appear before the authorities along with his certificates including medical fitness certificate. In compliance of the order dated 10.10.2002, Annexure-3, petitioner appeared before the 2 authorities with the documents and medical fitness certificate. During verification of certificates infirmity was noticed, as earlier he had suffered fracture. Having noticed the infirmity, his case was referred to the Medical Board under notice, bearing Memo No. 4114 dated 13.12.2006, Annexure-9. In compliance of the notice dated 13.12.2006, Annexure-9, petitioner also appeared before the Medical Board on 23.12.2006. The report of the Medical Board is dated 23.12.2006 and is contained in Annexure-10 to this petition. Even after receipt of the report of the Medical Board declaring him medically fit for being appointed as Process Server (Peon) in the judgeship of Saharsa, his case for such appointment is not being considered, so submitted learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Let petitioner appear with a copy of this order before the District & Sessions Judge, Saharsa, who should examine the matter and pass appropriate reasoned order, as early as possible, in any case within two months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order before 3 the District & Sessions Judge, Saharsa. 4. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Arjun/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.)