IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.590 of 2009 BABLOO KUMAR, S/O- JAGAT NARAYAN YADAV, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- PRITHIVIPUR, CHIRAIYATAR, P.S.- JAKKANPUR, DISTT- PATNA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATNA. 3. THE CITY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATNA. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATNA, SADAR. 5. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE OF GANDHI MAIDAN POLICE STATION, PATNA. ----------- 6 18.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent State. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent police authority should give appropriate assistance to the petitioner for taking appropriate legal action against the accused persons in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case no. 108/09. It is submitted that there are a large number of documents which need to be examined in course of investigation and that is not being done, with the result the investigation is not properly done. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, submits that it is not correct to say that the police is not properly investigating. As a matter of fact, the necessary instructions are being given by the supervising police officer. Considering the submissions of the parties, it 2 goes without saying that the investigation should proceed in accordance with law. However, if the writ petitioner has got any grievance, if any, he will be at liberty to bring it to the notice of the Superintendent of Police in this regard for appropriate action. The present writ application stands disposed of. Amrendra/ (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)