S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITIONfS) N0. 57^lf /2011. PETITIONERS: »>- ^.^ .^ ^<^ rMi3<fc:, f^^ " <^-, fs/' >^\ ^-^ ''/^'' \^ ^/y ^ 1. Ramchandra Singh, son ofBhoka Singh, aged about 44 years, residence of village Bargaon, Ichkela, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Jolson Kujur, son of Suresh Kujur, aged about 40 years, residence of village Bargaon, Ichkela, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. ^ 3. Trilochan Prasad Sai, son of F'urunder Sai, aged about 36 years, residence of Karitala, , Ichkela, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Anod Kumar Bada, son of Shri Mashin Prakash Bada, aged about 40 years, residence of Narayanpur CHirwar, Post Aara, District Jashpur, Chhatdsgarh. 5. Ku.Probin Sandhya Tirkey, son of Insun Tirkey, aged about 35 years, residence ofvillage Ketar, Post Aara, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. Resoondents Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Secretaiy, School Educadon • Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. •.ftT'rtSi-Sii^'E-.;; i.-'^^T •^•^F^^^ ?S8^^^^3?^gH^^'»^^!i'I^ -.^^i'£SS.S.'ife;t(^ »^^tSS^®^"A*aB'SKt^^ -^ 7 2- 3. Director, Public Instructions, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhatdsgarh. f'' ^ 5. Assistant Conunissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 6'. Collector, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 7. Sarpanch, Grara Panchayat, Bargaon, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BtLASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) W.P.(S)No. 5724 of 2011 Petitioner Ramchandra Singhand others VERSUS Respondents StateofChhattisgarh and others Pr^s^n*0 Rao, counsei P^St. Shri CJK. petitloners. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. A.G forthe State. for the O RD E R (26.09.2011) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the caseof the petjtioner and s'miiarly placed persons is under consideratlon with the State Government and this fact is evident from the ietter dated 29.01.2008 (Annexure P-5) and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition, at this stage with liberty to file fresh representation and to pursue the same. 2. Learned State counsel hasno objection if the petitioner withdraws this petition. 3. Petitioner is granted permission to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge