IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No. 871 of 2009 Date of decision : July 21, 2010 Gurpreet N.P. Singh ....Appellant versus Surinder Pal Singh ....Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocate, for the appellant Mr. JS Thind, Advocate for Mr. Sharan Sethi, Advocate, for the respondent L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) On 4.5.2010, learned counsel for the respondent stated that the instant second appeal against preliminary decree for partition has been rendered infructuous because both parties have moved applications in the trial court under the Partition Act for purchasing each other's share. Learned counsel for the appellant admits that both the parties have moved such applications in the trial court. In view of aforesaid, the instant second appeal is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. ( L.N. Mittal ) July 21, 2010 Judge 'dalbir'