IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 16TH AUGUST 2007 / 25TH SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 24718 of 2007(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- REJITHA S.NAIR, AGED 18 YEARS, D/O.SATHISH CHANDRAN NAIR, PUTHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, SOUTH PAMPADY. BY ADV. SMT.GIRIJA.L. SMT.P.S.PREETHA RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE MANAGER, THE FEDERAL BANK LTD., PAMPADY BRANCH, KOTTAYAM. 2. REGIONAL MANAGER, THE FEDERAL BANK LTD., KOTTAYAM. BY SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE,SC-FEDERAL BANK THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No. 24718 of 2007-P = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 16th day of August, 2007. JUDGMENT The petitioner applied to the first respondent bank for a loan for educational purpose. That has been rejected as per Ext.P1 on the ground that she had not obtained the minimum mark of 60% for her Plus Two course. The petitioner is undergoing B.Sc. Nursing in Andhra Pradesh. According to the bank, the petitioner had not obtained that admission on the basis of the entrance examination and in such event, she cannot aspire for loan unless she had secured 60% marks for the Plus Two examination. This stand of the bank is in tune with the scheme it has evolved to extend loan for educational purpose. Under such circumstances, I do not find any ground to issue any WP(C)24718/07 -: 2 :- direction as sought for. The writ petition fails. The same is accordingly dismissed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/