IN THE HIGH COURT QF I&DHSA PR&DESH AT Oa,B?.r<PUR iSRff. PBTITIONIK). ^,_S_L"3'_ OF 1993^ / , , 3 fcCci'0^. PETITIOHERS •• 1. Adarsh Saageet Kala Samiti, Rahraanjla Cbowk, Ralpur, M.P. -fcbroagh its .President Salshan Begara, 2. Hajra Bano, D/o Masuk, r/o Rahmania ChoiA, Raipar, Seore'tary, Adarsh Sangge^ Kala Samiti, Sahinani-a Chowia, Haipar. 3. Soutail Be.gam, Wife Mohd. Rasheefl , r/o Rahraania Chowk, RajLpur, Vice President, Adarsh Sangeet Kala Saml-tl., Rahmania Chowk, Raipur. 4. Naseera Bano Alias RSni, alias Naseem Begam, Wife o£ Eadir Khan, aged 30 yrs., ¥/o Rahmania Chowk Hadpur, Trea'sursr, Adarsh Sangeet Kala S'amitt, Rahnagnia Chowk, Raipur. 5. Nawab Bano, D/o Laxman Prasad Vaidya , r/o Rahmania Chowk, Raipur, Asslstanfc' Secrstar?, Adarsh Sangeet Kala Samiti, Rahmanla Chowlt, Raipur. 6. Rani alias Rani Begam, D/w Jaraal Khan, r/o Rahmania Chowk, BAipur, A dvisor to Ada_rsh Sangeet Kala Sainiti , Rahraanla Chowlc , Raipur. SEggQNDENTS ; VS. ^ :•' 1. State of iahya Pradebh throviSiti VSss:. Secre-feary, GoveraneBt o£ Ma(dhy&;g^^g IS3R;SsK^;^^ Jfc^' :.''''^:^^SSs^SM Hbafe Bepgartmerrb, •Valla| ^|»'|@^^S Bhopal. [.,»» ^'^*.— 2. Collec-fcor aalpur. 3. Inspector General of Eolice Raipur. 4. Superfntendent o£ Pollce Ralpur. > PTSl^ICTS U SEK_AS^Cr£S_226^22^_a^_TaSJ:0^^ lEC'a ll'l XI-HC-22 Sn^TqiT R-fich3t1^T sbtliqi'yRa --W 'C- ssf •^wm^, w^\w\e, wwwy, MST'ch 11*<WI «s11<» Sll^l ^.fAW.^'•'Wi; 200 Rre^ 341^1 ^•WIWfff^T 12.7.2QOS When the inatter is (t of thc pctitioncr. No repr^ Shri Devesh Venna, The main relief so|i petition is that pctitioner tQ, continue th^ keep survilliance on thc This matter was fildd date i.e. 25,7.1994 notice respon4ents thereafter, thc petitipner t;^<^ /iw ^ the petition was fyf fhe yes] action does not surviv] Accordingly, this inatter infructuous (•alled out, noue present on behalf ;scntatioa is inade. f.L. for the State. (ught by the petitioncr in thls be directed to allow the fcir cultural activities and not to a<|;tivities of the petitioner society. in thc ycar 1994, on the first ]was issucd to the respondent and never persued the matter. Since *i''iid<n-f Mii<ci)'ffrsl<o <R]«|< ^arf^Tan^T r 1994, it seems that thc causc of in view of 7«iIBau£^of tiine. is disposed of as having becoiae Sd/. L.C. Bhadoo Judge (<Nf^f^) WSi l^tss^