IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 14TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 23RD BHADRA 1932 Crl.MC.No. 1455 of 2010() ------------------------ CC.365/2010 OF JUDL. FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, CHALAKUDY CRIME NO. 198/2010 OF CHALAKUDY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR ....................................... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 2 TO 5 & 1:- ----------------------------------- 1. DILEEP, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.DINESH, CHETTIPARAMBIL VEEDU, CHENNATHU NADU DESOM,CHALAKUDY VILLAGE, 2. DEEPAK, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.DINESH, CHETTIPARAMBIL VEEDU, CHENNATHU NADU DESOM,CHALAKUDY VILLAGE, 3. SURESH @ VINE, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.SUBRAMANYAN, CHEMBAKASSERY VEEDU, VETTUKADAVU DESOM, CHALAKUDY VILLAGE, 4. SHAIJU, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.PAULOSE, KURIYASSERY VEEDU, PUZHPHAGIRI DESOM, MELOOR VILLAGE, CHALAKUDY, 5. MONY @ KALABHAVAN MONY, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.RAMAN,KUNNASSERY VEEDU,CHENNATHU NADU DESOM, CHALAKUDY VILLAGE, BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI. PRATHAP PILLAI SRI.C.U.SANGEETH SRI.PRABIN BABU RESPONDENT / STATE :- --------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. 2. THE MANAGER, DREAM WORLD WATER PARK ATHIRAPPILLY, KANHIRAPPILLY, CHALAKUDY. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. P.A. SALIM R2 BY ADV.SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. =========================== CRL.M.C.No. 1455 OF 2010 =========================== Dated this the 14th day of September,2010 ORDER Petitioners are the accused in C.C.365/2010 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Chalakudy taken cognizance for the offence under sections 143, 147,149,323, 448 read with section 149 of Indian Penal Code on Annexure I final report submitted by the Sub Inspector of Police, Chalakudy after investigation. This petition is filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the cognizance taken contending that the ingredients of the offences are not attracted. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, second respondent and learned Public Prosecutor were heard. 3. On going through the final report, it Crl.M.C.1455/2010 2 cannot be said that ingredients of an offence is not attracted. It is upto the petitioner to approach the learned Magistrate and raise the contentions and seek an order of discharge under section 239 of Code of Criminal Procedure. With liberty to file an application for discharge under section 239 of Code of Criminal Procedure raising the contentions raised herein, petition is disposed. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE tpl/- M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. --------------------- W.P.(C).NO. /06 --------------------- JUDGMENT SEPTEMBER,2006