... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.540 OF 2001 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.540 OF 2001 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.540 OF 2001 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri S.V.More, A.P.P for the Appellant. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 22, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 22, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 22, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned A.P.P for the State. The Appeal is for enhancement of the sentence. The Respondent was convicted for the offence under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The substantive sentence was of rigorous imprisonment for one year. The prosecution could not establish charge under section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. There is no Appeal preferred by the State against the acquittal. I have perused the impugned Judgment and Order. Considering the findings recorded, I find that the discretion exercised by the Trial Court is proper. No case is made out for enhancement. Appeal is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE