1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.576 OF 2010. MANGESH SUKHDEO RATHOD VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri N.H. Joshi, Advocate for the applicant. Shri S.S. Doifode, APP for respondent State. Coram : A.H. JOSHI, J. Date : 26th April, 2010. 1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Joshi at length. He claims that the applicant is entitled for bail in view that neither of the witnesses named him as the assailant. 2. Perused the record and affidavit of the State. 3. It is seen that in the Dying Declaration, the applicant has been named. The weapon discovered and used in commission of offence is bamboo stick recovered under Section 27 of Evidence Act. 2 4. There is adequate material collected by the Investigating machinery against the applicant. 5. In these premises, the applicant is not entitle for bail. 6. Criminal Application is, therefore, rejected. Judge |mule|