THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.12989 of 2002 Dated: 29-09-2006 Between: Smt. Shaheen Jahangir Begum. ..... PETITIONER AND The Mandal Revenue Officer, Ranga Reddy District, and others. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO WRIT PETITION No.12989 of 2002 ORDER: Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 herein filed a complaint before respondent No.1 for grant of amendment (presumably to the order of succession) in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.0.28 guntas in survey No.757/P situated at Shamshabad. The petitioner filed objections before the Mandal Revenue Officer(MRO), respondent No.1 herein, who having heard the matter on 29-06-2002, while advising counsel for both the parties to file written arguments by 06-07-2002, stayed the succession orders granted to the petitioner on 02-07-2002. Again on 06-07-2002, the stay was further extended up to 20-07-2002. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed instant writ petition. The petitioner inter alia contends that when once MRO issues succession, he has no power to review its own order or amend the same and therefore, any enquiry by MRO would be without jurisdiction. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (General) submits that the impugned orders are in the nature of notice. When the petitioner has already filed her objections, she can even raise the objections as are raised in this writ petition before MRO. It is now well settled that when once a notice is issued, the aggrieved person cannot seek invalidation of such notice in a writ petition. All questions including the questions of jurisdiction or errors in exercise of jurisdiction can be raised before the same authority, who issued notice. (see Special Director v. Mohd. Ghulam Ghouse[1]). Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner to raise all the objections as raised in this writ petition before MRO. No costs. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 29th September, 2006 ghn [1] 2004(3) SCC 440