WP(C) 229/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. M.H. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. B.K. Sarma , learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department appearing for all the resp ondents. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for disposal at the motion stage itself. The grievance of the petitioners in the present petition is that though they wer e engaged as Anganwadi Workers in the month of January, 1991, they have not been considered for promotion to the post of Supervisor against the quota fixed for that purpose. The petitioners, therefore, pray for a direction to the responden t authorities to consider their case for promotion to the post of Supervisor aga inst the quota fixed for that purpose, whenever any process in that respect is i nitiated. Mr. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department has submitted tha t the case of the petitioners for promotion would be considered provided they co me within the zone of consideration and in terms of the service orders formulate d for that purpose. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the parties and the facts involved in the present writ petition, the present pet ition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Supervisor against the quota fix ed for that purpose and strictly in terms of the service orders formulated in th at regard, provided the petitioners come within the zone of consideration. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No cost.