IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8008 of 2008. Decided on: 30.06.2010. __________________________________________________________ Shri Het Ram. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate vice Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): It is jointly represented by the learned counsel for the parties that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment dated 7th July, 2009 rendered by this Court in CWP(T) No.2599 of 2008, titled as Uma Dutt Sharma versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. Consequently, the petition is allowed. Respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for release of increments for the ad hoc period. This period shall also be counted for the purpose of pensionary benefits. Needful shall be done within a period of eight weeks from today. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. June 30, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 -