1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE SIDE SECOND APPEAL NO.968 OF 2004 (Shri.Shankar Vishwanath Chiplunkar V/s Ravindra S.Pathak) | Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram | Court’s or Judge’s Orders appearances, Court’s orders or directions | and Registrar’s orders. | Mr.M.V.Limaye, for the Appellant. Mr.R.V.More i/by Mr.Uday Warunjikar for the Respondent. CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 1st March, 2011. P.C.: 1. Not on board. Mentioned. Learned counsel for the parties state that the matter is amicably settled between the parties. Hence, by consent, second appeal is taken on board. 2. The parties have tendered the consent terms duly signed by the Power of Attorney holder of the Appellant and his Advocate, as also the Respondent and his Advocate. The consent terms are notorised on 24.1.2011. The said consent terms alongwith the copy of Special Power of Attorney dated 6.12.2010 are collectively taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. The son of the Appellant viz.Deepak Shankar Chiplunkar (who is also the 2 Power of Attorney holder of the appellant), as also the Respondent viz. Ravindra S.Pathak are present before the Court. They admit the execution of the consent terms. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the consent terms, I am satisfied that the dispute between the parties is adjusted by way of lawful compromise. In view of this, the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below are quashed and set aside, and the same are substituted by the consent terms. Decree shall be drawn up in terms of the consent terms. 4. Second Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the consent terms, with no order as to costs. (R.G.KETKAR, J.)