,6,” / e if» IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH 5’ AT BILASPUR w.P.(S). No. “737 [2010 PETITIONER Smt. Arun Kumari Tiwari, aged about 48 years, Wd/o Late Shri Hari Prasad Tiwari, R/o Village “W “6. @ g. (gibi yr“ KL ..... yo“. Maro, Tahsil Navagarh, Distt. Durg @ ‘ 0/ (c.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS /:1. State of Chhattiégarh Through : The Secretary Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur ('C.G.) ’ / 2. Accountant General State‘of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Biock Education Officer, Patharia Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. w WRIT PETITION (S) No. 951 of 2010 : Smt. Arun Kumari Tiwari. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhat‘tisgarh & Oihers. WRIT PETITTON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’hie Shri Satish K. Aggglgom, J. HIGH COURT OF CHI-IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Present: Shri K.S.Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents 1, 3 & 4. Shri Anand ‘ienna, Advocate for the respondent No; 2 ORAL ORDER (Passed on 08 day of March, 2010) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is heard finally. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case, being payment of retiral benefits matter, may be referred to the pension committee. This Court, in the matter of WP. No. 464222004 (Baijrzath A/Iandal V. The State of Chham'sgarh d’c Others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in WP. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh & Others v. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 315‘ of January, 2008 passed in WP. No. 3 4642/2004 Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. With the consent of the patties, this petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of l 5 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concerned, within a fuither period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed Within a period of four months hom the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. The petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petition to the leamed counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the same to the Committee. ‘:‘~:\ Sd/— \FR t 5‘ SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge