IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2010 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 12519 of 2010(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- AMJAD ALI.P, S/O.MUHAMMED.P., AGED 21 YEARS, PM MANZIL HOUSE, KARUVARAKUNDU PO, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.JOSHI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. SHRI P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.12519/2010-L ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 8th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has completed his B.Tech (Mechanical Engineering) in June, 2008 from the Calicut University of Institute of Engineering Technology, University Campus. He passed in all the subjects except one paper, i.e. Dynamics of Machinery, a paper in the sixth semester. He appeared for the said paper in the supplementary examination conducted in December, 2008 but could not succeed. Thereafter, he further appeared for the paper in June, 2009. The result of the said examination was published in March, 2010. He could obtain only 31 marks out of 50. The petitioner was expecting more than 35 marks for the written examination and, therefore, he applied for revaluation after remitting the prescribed fee. Ext.P1 is the copy of the application for revaluation and Ext.P2 is the copy of the chalan evidencing the remittance of the prescribed fee. It is the case of the petitioner that he has got an employment under a contractor in Cochin Shipyard on production of his course certificate and on assurance to produce the provisional certificate at the earliest W.P.(C). No.12519/2010 -:2:- possible, and if the publication of the result of revaluation is not done within a time frame, he would lose his present employment. Seeking for a direction to the respondents to complete the process of revaluation and publish the results within a time frame this writ petition has been filed. 2. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the University. There will be a direction to the respondents to complete the process of revaluation of the answer paper of the petitioner, if the application for revaluation along with the requisite fee covered by the chalan have been received and are in order, and communicate the result thereof, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms/kav