IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2009 / 2ND MAGHA 1930 RP.No. 350 of 2008 ------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN MFA.156/2005 Dated 11/09/2007 ............... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------- DEVU, W/O. CHAMIYAR MANNAMPARAMBU, KANNEMBRA P.O., ALATHUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAGHAVAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. COIMBATORE, REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY MANAGER, KOCHI REGIONAL OFFICE, AJAY VIHAR, M.G.ROAD, COCHIN-16 2. CHAMIYAR (DIED) 3. J.DAVID, S/O. JAYASEELI 46, BISHOP XAVIER COLONY SAMIYAR NEW STREET, NO.2 FORT, COIMBATORE. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: A. K. Basheer & Thomas P. Joseph, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No.350 of 2008 in MFA (NC Aqct) No. 156 of 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2009. Order Basheer, J: Petitioner was one of the claimants before the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and respondent No.2 in MFA.No.156/2005. The appeal preferred by respondent No.1, National Insurance Company, was disposed of by this Court on September 11, 2007 holding that claimants were entitled to get interest only from the date of the order of the Commissioner. The above view was taken by this Court relying on a decision of the Apex Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mubasir Ahmed (2007 (3) KLT 26). 2. It is contended by the petitioner that this Court was not justified in interfering with the order passed by the Commissioner. We are afraid the above contention cannot be sustained in view of the latest decision of their Lordships of the Supreme Court in Kamla Chaturvedi v. National Insurance Co. (2008 (4) KLT 862 (SC)). In this decision the Apex Court has re- affirmed the view taken by it in Mubasir's case (supra). In that view of the matter, there is no merit in the contention raised by the petitioner. Therefore the Review Petition is dismissed. A.K. BASHEER Judge Thomas P. Joseph Judge an.