:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION(M) NO.241 OF 2004 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST.NO.30567/04 Mrs. Indira V.Nair .... Applicant. Versus Mr.Vijaychandran T.V. .... Respondent. Shri Pravin S.Mane with Anil Subramaniam for the appellant. Smt.Geeta P. Mulekar for respondent No.1. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & S.R.SATHE,JJ. S.R.SATHE,JJ. S.R.SATHE,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : : : 27th June,2005. ----------- PC: 1. Heard both sides. This is applciation for condonation of delay of 98 days. The delay has been properly explained. Mrs.Mulekar appaering for husband/respondent no.1 opposed for condonation of delay and claimed cost. However, since we found that the delay has been expalined properly, we did not accept the submission made by Mrs. Mulekar. :2: -2- The delay is condoned. Application is accordingly disposed off. (S.R.SATHE) (S.R.SATHE) (S.R.SATHE) (S.B.MHASE) (S.B.MHASE) (S.B.MHASE)