IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5304 of 2000 Between: T.Mohan Rao S/o.Guravaiah Sub registrar's Office Kaikalur , Krishna Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt of A.P Rep by its Secretary Revenue Dept , Secretariat Hyderabad-004. 2 The Inspector General of Registration and Stamps Govt of A.P , Hyderabad. 3 The Dist Registrar of Assurance Krishna Dist , Machilipatnam. 4 J.venkateswara Rao S/o. Registrar of Chits , Machilipatnam -2 Krishna Dist. 5 S.Hanumantha Rao S/o.Subba Rao Sub Registrar's Office , Ravulapalem E.G.Dist. 6 V.Satyanarayana S/o. Sub Registrar office , Pamarru , krishna Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to revise the seniority of this petitioner by placing him above the respondents 4 to 6 as stood at their initial appointment as Temporary Section Writers on monthly basis with all attendant benefits such as the subsequent promotions to the posts of Temporary section writers on annual continuity basis , clerk etc and by also giving financial benefits refixing the pay that the order Dt: 31-12-99 in OA.No.532/92 of A.P.A.T is not respectively , by declaring that the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in fixation of the seniority of this petitioner below the respondents 4 to 6 is highly improper , unjust , arbitrary , contrary to law and Violation of the Fundamental Rights and the Principles of Natural Justice and to pass such other or further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.D.RAMALINGA SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Sri V.Eswaraiah, J.) Sri D.Vivekananda representing Sri D.Ramalingaswamy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of this writ petition has become infructuous and there survives no cause for adjudication. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. ___________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J. 17.6.2009 kpr