THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.23024 of 2007 Dated 06th July, 2011 Between: B.V.Chalapathirao and another …Petitioners And The Branch Manager, Bank of India, Anakapalli Branch, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District …Respondent Counsel for the petitioners: Sri G.L.Nageswara Rao Counsel for respondent: Sri S.Surya Prakasa Rao The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents in harassing the petitioners for repayment of the loan amount by sending the collection agents and henchmen, without any reason or cause as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondent not to harass the petitioners by sending the collection agents and henchmen and further direct the respondent to follow the due process of law.” At the hearing, Sri G.L.Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, interim order, dated 01.11.2007, shall stand vacated and W.P.M.P.No.30005 of 2007 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 06th July, 2011 VGB