IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9542 of 2010 SHAHLA RIZVI Versus SYED KHALIL AHMAD & ORS ----------- 5. 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner urges that there is no discussion in the impugned order as to in what manner the amendment was seeking to withdraw admission made in the plaint and what were those admission. Learned counsel for the respondents is unable to demonstrate from the impugned order the application of judicial mind by a discussion of the nature of the amendment sought and which admission in the earlier written statement was sought to be withdrawn. The order dated 17.1.2009 is set aside. The matter is remanded to the trial Court to pass a fresh, reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)