1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.510/2011 (for review) IN WRIT PETITION NO.3051/2010 (D) The Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation, through the Chairman and Managing Director and another ...Versus... Kalidas Krishnaji Gadpayale Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. [Shri N.R. Saboo, Adv. for applicants/review petitioners] CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & A.B. CHAUDHARI,JJ. DATED : 15.07.2011. Heard the learned Counsel for the review petitioners. We do not find any error in the direction, made by this Court to release the terminal benefits due to the employee which were withheld. As a matter of fact the review petitioners themselves withdrew the recovery notices with a view to hold enquiry. But then nothing prevented the review petitioners from proceeding and completing the enquiry within a reasonable period. 2 Learned Counsel for the review petitioners submitted that this Court granted stay of enquiry proceedings. Even in that case, since the review petitioners themselves withdrew their action, consequence must follow. Further prayer made by the learned Counsel for the review petitioners to direct the respondent to furnish security is wholly untenable in these proceedings. Misc. Civil Application is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE ssw