"y y t •'t- ^.. P^-C^) Q^A8 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR SingJeBench: Appellants Respondents HonybteShri DiJipRaosaheb Deshmukh,J. F.A.M (Pm No.351 of 2007 1. Ravi Kumar, S/o Madantat, aged about 16yearss 2. ChoteLat, S/opMadanlal, agedabout15 years Both are minor through their mother (legal guardian) Smt. Shanti Devi, W/o Madanlat, R/o Akaltara, Tahsit-Janjgir, Distt. JanJgir-Champa (CG) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Collector, District Janjgir Champa(CG) . . 2. Executive Engineerf, PublJG Works CDepartment, Champa Division, District Jahjgir-Champa (CG) F.A (IVIl under Section 54 of the Land Acauisition Act. 1894. Present: Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, counsel for theiappetiant/s. ShriP.R: Patankar, PLforState. ! , ORALORDER (P^ssed on 06.08.2008) .Learned counsel for the appeitants submjtted that the appeltants have no grievance against the quantum of cpmpensation awarded by the learned Additional District Judge, Janjgir-Champa in M.J.C. No.14/2006. Leamed counsel for the appellants urged that white passing the impugned order, the learned AdditionatDistrict has not awarded any compensation fromthe date of publication of notification under Section 4 (1) pfthe Land Acquisition Act, 1894. (2) In this view of the matter, learned counsel for the appellants sought permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file an application for review before the learned Additionat Distriot Judge, Janjgir- Ghampa for awarding interest from the date of publication of notification under Section 4 (1) ofthe Land Acquisition Act, 1894. (3) Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The appellants/plaintiffs are at fiberty to avail the remedy as prayed for, if J_AA-. available under the taw. Priya Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge €ill