IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2008 / 14TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 478 of 2008(F) ------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------ A.PADMAVATHY, AGED 73 YEARS, D/O.K.P.GOVINDAN, MANAGER, S.N.B.U.P.SCHOOL, VADAKKUMPAD, (RESIDING AT PADMAVILAS, VADAKKUMPAD, THALASSERY-9, KANNUR DISTRICT). BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM-14. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KANNUR, KANNUR-2. 4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THALASSERY NORTH-670 101, KANNUR DISTRICT. 5. SMT.A.SOUMINI, W/O.DAMODARAN, RESIDING AT SREEKRISHNA NEAR KARATHKUNNU, VADAKKUMPAD, THALASSERY-9, KANNUR DISTRICT. 6. SMT.A.BHARGAVI, W/O.C.V.NANU, RESIDING AT SUCHINTA, VADAKKUMPAD, THALASSERY-9, KANNUR DISTRICT. 7. SMT.A.VILASINI, W/O.KUMARAN, RESIDING AT DILKUSH, VADAKKUMPAD, THALASSERY-9, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. A.J. VARGHESE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.478 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT In respect of a management dispute among the petitioner and respondents 5 to 7, the petitioner has filed Ext.P8 revision petition before the 1st respondent. The petitioner now seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P8 expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Government pleader also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there would be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P8, if the same has been received, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner as well as respondents 5 to 7 and other members of the educational agency. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd