IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30657 of 2009 1. RAGHO CHAUDHARY s/o Late Jivneshwar Chaudhary 2. Indrashan Devi, w/o Ragho Chaudhary Both resident of village- Rampura, P.S.- Singhwara, District- Darbhanga … Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR … Opp. party ----------- 3. 23.02.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State. Considering the nature of allegation for an offence under Section 304 B I.P.C. and the fact that the petitioners being father-in-law and mother-in-law, did not even bother to inform about the alleged unnatural death of their daughter-in-law to the family members of the deceased, Bahu and proceeded to cremate the dead body in a hurry which would only go to show that the petitioners and their son were involved in the occurrence as alleged. In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. That being so, this application 2 is rejected. However, in the event the petitioners would surrender and pray for regular bail, the court below would consider their prayer for regular bail on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)