IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14150 of 2011 CHANDAN RAI @ CHANDAN KUMAR RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 47(A) of the Excise Act. The recovery is of 600 liters of spirit in three drums, 200 liters in each drum. Though the order of the learned Sessions judge reflects that the recovery has been made from the house of petitioner. My attention has been drawn to the seizure list which reflects that recovery was made from the orchard of one Deo Narayan Rai. It appears that the seizure was made on 14.10.2010 but the prosecution report was transmitted to the learned court below on 14.01.2011 which clouds bonafide of accusation. The statement has been made in the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on 2 bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with C-2/24/10 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)