IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46324 of 2009 1. UMA SHANKAR RAI 2. Janeshwar Rai 3. Nandji Rai Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 29.01.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the prayer of the petitioner nos. 1 and 2, inasmuch as they have been arrested during the pendency of the application. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as against the petitioner nos. 1 and 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Assault in course of altercation was being protested by a mob, if the road blockade was not followed by any other violent act causing injury to anyone, petitioner no. 3 is entitled for anticipatory bail. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 177 of 2009, above named petitioner no.3 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bhojpur at Ara subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)