IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 4026 of 2010 Decided on : 15.11.2011 ________________________________________________ Pushpinder Jaswal … Petitioner Versus Union of India and others … Respondents. ___________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Sandeep Sharma, ASGI, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. Advocate General, with Mr. Anil Jaswal, Dy. Advocate General, for respondent No.3. ____________________________________________________ V.K. Sharma, Judge (oral). Heard. In view of the averments set up on behalf of the petitioner in para 2 of CMP No. 11545 of 2011, which are extracted below and without expressing any opinion on the respective contentions raised on behalf of the parties and on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction that subject to the petitioner making a detailed representation supported by documents, if any, along with copy of this judgment to the respondents/competent authority within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment, the said 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 respondents/competent authority shall consider the same and take a final decision in the matter within further one month, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, if so desired:- “That in the reply which has been submitted by the Respondents, it has been mentioned therein that the range population of assembly constituency is 74286-90794 in respect of Hamirpur District as per the final order of the Delimitation Commission and the total population of Nadaun Tehsil is 91,410 which is marginally greater than the average population. The submission of the applicant is that in view of this admission the Relying Respondents may kindly be directed take into consideration the issues raised by the Applicant in the writ petition and take steps to include Patwar Circles Hareta, Manglu, Ghalian, Palvin, Kotlu, Paniyali, Sarari Lahara, Badran and Phal in Badsar Constituency to maintain average population in Nadaun Constituency and also to maintain administrative convenience as has been stated in the petition and rejoinder.” 2. The petition stands disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any, in the above terms. (V.K. Sharma) Judge. November 15, 2011. (Lsp)