IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.13402 M of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.1.2009 Ram Niwas ...Petitioner Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL Present: Mr.A.K.Khunger, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Preet Pal Singh, Advocate for U.T.,Chandigarh Mr.RS Dhiman, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** Harbans Lal, J. After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition and the personal appearance of the petitioner before the learned trial Court may be exempted. In view of the statement made above, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner will be at liberty to move an application seeking exemption of his personal appearance before the learned trial Court. The learned trial Court will consider all the grounds mentioned in such application before passing any orders on such application. If the learned trial court happens to dismiss such application, the petitioner will be at liberty to approach this Court. January 22, 2009 (Harbans Lal) gsv Judge