•'.^^ f?+ HIGH COTJRT OF CHHATTTSGAmi AT BILASPIJR PETITIONER RE.SPONDENTS • Wiit Petition No. 5729 of2005 Muimalal Dewangan, son of le^te Shri Kaiihaiyalal Dewangan, Agecl about 31 years, resident of Dewangan Mohlla, Champa, Tehsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa \T,!?STTS 1. State of Clihattisgarh tlmw.gh th€t Secretary, Envirosmient & Urban Devclopiiient Departmenl, DKS Bhawan, Raipur 2. The CoUector, Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir Champa (CG). 3. The ChiefMumcipal Officer, Mumcipal CoiiiK?il, Champa^ Distt. Jarygir Champa (CG). (WRIT PETTTTON TJNnER ARTTCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTmmON OF INDIA) (SB: Hontble rvti\SatiidiK.Asiuhotri,-J.i Preseiit : Sliri V,K. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Smita Ghai, Paiiel Law>/er for the State. ORALORDER (Passed 011 tius 10th ofApriI, 2008) 1. With the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for hearmg finally. 2 Leanied counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioiier does not wa??t to contest the matter on merit. However, the petitioner prays fbr liberh^ to make represetitatiosi before the authorities conceni^d to consider his representation dated 23.09.05 (Asmexure P/6) isi accordance with law, cn its own merit, as expeditioiisly as possible, preferabfy wifhin a period of three montlis, in view of the fact that the order dated 01.06.2005 (Ajmexiire P/2) was passed b}^ the Collector himsetf, to which leamed coimsel appearmg for the State has no objection. 3. Without expressing any opmion on merit, the petitioiier is granted liberty to make representation before the concerned authority. The respondent authorities ma)^ consider the ca^e ofthe petitioiier, ifany represeiitation is made, in accordaiice with law, expeditioiisly. 4. Tliis petition is accordmgly disposed ofwith the above stated libert^^ No order ast.o costs. Sahu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge