IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2008 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 31411 of 2008(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SEBY ANTONY, S/O. MAZHUVANCHERY ANTONY, AGED 38 YEARS, MAZHUVANCHERY HOUSE, KIDANGOOR, ANGAMALI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. SHINCY SEBY, W/O. SEBY ANTONY, MAZHUVANCHERY HOUSE, KIDANGOOR, ANGAMALI, ERNAKULAM DISTICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. ANGAMALI MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, ANGAMALI, ERNAULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTAPURAM. 3. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN ADDL. R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN I.A.NO. 13742/2008 DATED 3-11-2008. ADV. SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM (SR.) FOR R1 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. M.R. SABU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: W.P.C.NO. 31411/2008. ----------------------------------------------------------------- EXT.P1 COPY OF REGISTERED SALE DEEDS DT. 27-7-2007. EXT.P2 DO. DT. 4-8-2007. EXT.P3 SURVEY MAP. EXT.P4 ORDER DT. 20-9-2008. EXT.P5 DECISION OF MUNICIPAL COUNCIL DT. 8-9-2008. EXT.P6 JUDGMENT IN W.P.C.NO.32610/2007. EXT.P7 APPEAL SUBMITTED BEFORE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, ANGAMALI MUNICIPALITY DT. 30-10-2008. [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE. S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 31411 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 3rd November, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioners have filed this writ petition for the following reliefs: “i) Issue a writ of certiorari calling the original of Ext. P4 and quash the same. ii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to approve the proposed building plan submitted by the petitioners and issue the consent for the same at the earliest.” The petitioners now confine their relief for a direction to the additional 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P7 appeal. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the Municipality also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the additional 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P7 appeal, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/