l^ HI@H COURT OF CHHATriSGABhl AT BtLASPUR DIVISION BENGH CORAM: HON'BLE Simi RAJ^V GUPTA, CJ & HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. W.P.tONo. 718 of 2008 PETITIONERS 1«^ RESPONDENTS. 1. Eskay Buitdworks Private Ltd. Through its authortzed signatory Ajay Kumar Agrawai, S/o Shri Shjv Kumar Agrawal, aged about 39 years, 27/4 Motilal Nehru Nagar (East), Bhilai, Dtstt. Durg (C.G.) 2. Ajay Kumar Agrawat, s/o Shri Shiv Kumar Agrav^l, aged about 39 yeare, Director, Eskay Buitdworks Private Ltd. 27/4 Motita) Nehru Nagar (East), Bhilai, Distt. Durg(C.G.) VERSUS 1. South East Certral Raitway - Through its Genera! Manager. South East Centrai Raiiway, Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. The Chief El^trical Engineer (Construction), South East Central Railway, Bilaspur (QG.) 3. The Deputy Chief Electrical Engin^r (Construotion), South East Centra! Railway, Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Deputy Chief Eleotrteal Engineer (Constmction), South East Central Raiiway, Biiaspur (C.G.) Writ petltton under Artiele 226 of the Constitution of India Present: Shri P. Diwakar, tearnKi Senior Advwate with Shri P.R. Patankar, tearned counsel for the petitioners. Shri Abhishek Sinha, learnecl eounset for the respond^ite. ORDER (05th February72008) The fotlowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, CJ, -2-- @ Subbu In our opinion, the present writ petition is a premature one. (2) In this view of the matter, Shri P. Diwakar, tearned Senior Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file another writ petition ifthe future development so warrant (3) Permission granted. (4) With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge