1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 628 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA ============================================================== ============================================================== PUSTI SAMPRADAY (JAMNAGAR) - Petitioner(s) Versus DAU-DAYAL PUSTI SAMPRADAY HAVELI TRUST - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : MR HARIN P RAVAL for Petitioner No(s).: 1. MR JR SHAH for Respondent No(s).: 1. ============================================================== CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA Date : 27/06/2005 ORAL JUDGMENT Mr. JR Shah, learned advocate for the respondent, states that this Civil Revision Application is filed against the order dated 11.3.1999 rendered in Civil Misc. Appeal No.63 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 of any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? 2. of 1998 by the learned Extra Assistant Judge, Jamnagar confirming the order rendered below Application Ex.5 in Regular Civil Suit No.197 of 1998 granting injunction in favour of the respondent. He further states that the said Regular Civil Suit No.197 of 1998 has been disposed of by the learned trial Judge, therefore, this petition has now become infructuous. He therefore urged to pass appropriate orders. In view of the aforesaid statement made by Mr. JR Shah, since Regular Civil Suit No.197 of 1998 has been disposed of, this petition which is arising from the order passed therein, is disposed of as it has become infructuous with no order as to costs. Rule is discharged. (A.M. Kapadia, J.) ... (karan)