uewdtigyn HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P.No. 798 of 2010 APB-ICANT (!n Jai!) Non-ApDiicant v's Itwariram Vadav, aaed about 58 vears. S/o. iate Goku'aram Yadav, R/o. By caste Rawat, R/o. Piproad, Thana and Tahsil C-harama, Distt. Uttar Bastar Kanker. The State ot' Chhattisgarh Through Po'ice StaSlon Charama, DlsSricS Kianker (C.G.) (ADDiication u/s 439 of Cr.P.C. Fresent: Shri Yogendra Chandra, counsel forthe applicant. ^r"'!' Pi/E'ariht !''Tticsh^i ^t*">rth P<*F>aI | 'SIKA^^F fr^r ^'n^ <^t- "LJIiiL. iViS^ti^iiiOi iU ^iisyiE, i~ ili i^J5 £-Q1ty^Si sVi i.i iS? --?Ltate. Sinale Bench: Hon'bieShri Dhirendra Mjshra, J noai nonco t "s. i(~l i»> ^F a t. iurf- s~ a *. (27.10.2010) 1. By fhis application, the appiicant prays for modification of para-2 of the order dated 25.08.2010, in which it has been recorded that leamed counsel for the appllcant submits that the baii appiication preterred by Khorin Bai, wite of present appiicant has already been rejected by this Court vide order dated 08.02.2010 passed in M.Cr.C. No. 3015/20W and aliegations against the present appiicant are simiiar. 2. Learned counsel for the aDDlicant submitted that this submission ought to have been recorded on behaif of the Stata. 3. Heard. 4. From perusal of record of M.Cr.C. No. 3015/2009, it is evident that the appiication was argued by the same counsei and in these circumstances. the prayer for modification of- order is rejected. i Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge BSBHK 1^ 8B fs^ B