IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 16036 of 2010 Date of decision:29.7.2010 Rajender Prasad Petitioner vs. State of Haryana. Respondent Present: Mr. John Kumar, Advocate. Ms. Gursreet Kaur, DAG, Hry M.M.S.BEDI,J. It will certainly be a moot point during trial whether the petitioner can be prosecuted under Section 135/151 of the Electricity Act for having used the domestic connection for commercial purposes, especially when the penalty imposed upon him, as determined by the Consumer Court, stands deposited. The petitioner has already joined the investigation. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 27.5.2010 is hereby confirmed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioner, he will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the condition that the petitioner will join the investigation as and when required by the police and will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation. The petitioner will not commit the similar offence, of which he is accused of, during pendency of the trial. It is made clear that in case of violation of any of the above said conditions, the prosecution agency will be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail. July 29 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE