^ SINGLE^BENCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITON N0. -<'K?^?—/2005 ^ ^ ;^'., PETITIONER:^ RESPONDENTS 1)/ ^y -3) 4) Durg Education and Chaiitable S^ciety Through its Secretaiy Nalin Luni^/0- Shri D.C. Lunia, Aged about 32 years, R/0- H/S 110 Padmanabhpur Durg , District;^otefi-CC.Q.) State of Chhattisgarh Through;- Secretary Department of Agriculture D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralay Raipur (C.G.) Vice Chancellor Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalay Krishak Nagar Raipur (C.G.) Registrar Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalay Krishak Nagar Raipur (C.G.) Chainnan Board of Management Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalay Krishak Nagar Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22'6/227 'OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ^^1-qiqiOq, yTTl<(-l<l<i, Rrtl^^ *ll*ic»l^fH^ff • •v'f'• •'•• • ••7r-u-?t-^ •••........... 3TT^?Tq^P(^g^) w^^T^Tf^rra? ^TT3n^$T?CTrra? §'^wr;?rfln3:n^$T <bl<ylri'!i1'l ^l^riT^fei^ ^Rl^N ^3ri^T3?T^§T DB: Hon'ble Shri Ju^tice A. K. Patnaik, C.J. & Hon'ble Shri Ju^tice Satish K, Agnihotd, J. 26.9.2005 Heard Sint. petitioner, Shri for fhe Respondent Advocate wifh Shri A V. V. |S. : ident N{3.1, amida Siddque, Advocate for fhe Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General aad Shri Prashant Mishra, Senior B. D. Giiru, AdvQcate for fhe Respondents No. 2 to|4. By fhis writ pe|fcition fhe petitioner is chaUengiag ftie correctoiiess of fhe on^lers passed by fhe authonties of Indira Gaadhi Krishi Vish^avidyalaya, Krishak Nagar, Raipiir, reduciag the adinis prohibiting the aduii^ Agricultiire CoUege s^ The petitioner Aufliorities of fhe U| sttidents from outsi |sion capacity of fhe petitioner aad fesion to the maaagenient quota, ia the t up by fhe petitioner. tias also challenged the decision of the [liversity, prohibiting adinission of fhe te fhe State of Chhatdsgarh into the college set iip by fhe {petitiouer. We dispose of fhis writ petition with fhe direction fhat fhe petitioner w£U submit a representation against fhe aforesaid decisions l^eforc fhe Registrar, Indira Gaadhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, w considered by fhe University, in accoi tia wiU have the said representation conipetent aufhority of the aforesaid laace with fhe Act and the Regulations, wifhia a period of ^O days fromL the date of subniission of SR XI-HC-78 \jW| '-<4tq|0*l, U>-al'<-l<l<a, RlWWy< +IIH<AI 9y?f^ "" ' •"•4T '"^F^2006 3TT^?T ^cP (yi^q<g) 3n^^T<CTf^H<P ^n3TT^$T^^ ^^ y^ ^\\^ s^[?[TWr^rficT3TT^$T ^ ^ « such representation coinpetent aufhority <j conveyed to tbie petitio| petitloner to inove agairj Certified copy, as| <pi<4^<?li *ii^c')T^t^^ ><Ri<«ix ^3rf^T3II^9T ajid fhe decisions taken by fhe m the said representation wiU be |ier forthwifh. It wffl be open for the [ iti case tfae petitioner is so advised. iper Riiles. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge