1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1295 OF 2006 Bharat M. Yadav & anr. Petitioners vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & ors. Respondents Mr.M.M.Vashi for the petitioners. Ms.Priti Purandare for the respondents. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED : 5th September, 2006 P.C. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The petitioners have approached this court against the order dated 14th July, 2005. By that order, a stop-work notice has been issued and that was to continue till the investigation by Chief Engineer(Vigilance) and final orders are obtained from the Municipal Commissioner of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. On behalf of the Corporation, the learned counsel points out that Vigilance Officer has submitted his report to the Municipal Commissioner. 3. Considering the above, the Municipal Commissioner before passing the final order to hear the petitioners 2 and thereafter pass the necessary orders, at any rate not later than 12 weeks from today. 4. Rule is made absolute accordingly. There will be no order as to costs. ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) ( ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. ) ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. ) ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. )