2506wp4414.08.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETIITION NO. 4414 OF 2008 (Manikrao Sampat Chandane Vs. The Additional Commissioner & others) ...................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ...................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. N. B. Kalwaghe, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. Wandile, A. G. P. for respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. AJ Mirza, Adv. H/f Mr. Shareef, Advocate for respondents No. 5,6,7 & 9. CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATED : 25th JUNE 2010. The petitioner challenges the order passed by Additional Commissioner dated 10/6/2008 in respect of recording of mutation entries by revenue officials. It is well established that revenue entries are recorded for fiscal purpose and those are not in themselves evidence of entitlement of person to the property in question. The dispute in relation to the title as well as entitlement to the property is required to be resolved by the civil Courts. If the party to the litigation has any grievance in respect of the title or entitlement to the property, they may avail remedy by approaching proper forum for securing appropriate declaration. In any event, the revenue entries recorded by the revenue officials shall be subject to final outcome of the civil litigation that may be initiated by any of the parties to the litigation. At this stage, the Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave granted. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. JUDGE wwl