,/ BEFmE THE WHY? PRA'DES—l Mr/ENISTRATXVE TRIBUNH; JBP. o.A.No L'/IEV U) of 19% Ms Veena Siharma aged about 25 years daughtar ofProf. SgN.Shérma; resident of, 0m Nager, Jarhabhata... Bil aspur, District Bil aspur, M. P. .hppli cart : VS . Respomients? (1') The State of Ma&hya PradeSh through the Secretary. Higher Educatién Department, Govt. of Maéhy'a Pradesh, Vallabh Bhawan; Bhopal, M.P., ('2) Commissioner of Higher Echication‘; Maéhya Praéesh, Satpura Bhawen, Bh0p8l, MgPo (3) Principal, Government Lahri College Chimiri, District S§rguj a, M.P. DETAILS 9}: THE mpgcmxm , ; PEU§W “ M HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR TITIGN (S) N0. 773 0f 2005 Ms‘ Veena Shanna. ‘ The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any repreeentation is mad beha1f of the petitioaer. The petitioner may not be interested in In View ofthe above, he matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. gistry is directed to sen a copy ofthis order to the petitioner, foxthwith. ,y w Satish K. Agnihotri if, W, Judge Sd/— b WRIT PE APPLICANT e on pursuing the matr. te t Re d i . VERSUS RESPONDENTS The State ofMadhya Pradesh & Others. Present: None for the petitioner. Lawyer for the State. ORBER ORAL (Passe5; (m 04 day of November, 2009)