IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-18414 of 2009 Date of decision : 13.7.2009 Mahi Pal … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral) The only grievance of the petitioner is that despite dismissal of the anticipatory bail application preferred by the accused in this case, the accused has not been arrested till date. He has thus prayed that direction be issued to official respondents to take action against the accused, respondents No.4 and 5 and alternative plea to transfer the case to some other agency. In my considered view, the prayer of the petitioner is misconceived. No such direction is necessitated in this case. Other prayer made in the petition for handing over investigation to some other agency is not supported by any evidence to show that investigation is not being conducted in a proper manner. Dismissed. [ Rajan Gupta ] Judge 13.07.2009 sd