4 \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF fUDICATURE AT BILASPUR E WRIT PETITION (Art 227) NO 61$ OFm 2Q/a PETITIONERI 2/ Murar'l Lal Agrawal, aged abouT (Plam‘hff) 54 years, son of LaTe Rameshwar Lal Agrawal, residem‘ of 1“ floor, PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA é} %u\€z%w£3 ............ .... \Dr‘. Ahuja; Clinic's Bqilding, Jawahar Nafgar, Raipur, Tehsil : 9.9;» 1"“ QAN“ vf‘ .......... and Dismu Raipur (CG) Vs RESPONDENT /: Pramod Kumar A‘grawal, son of (De‘fendam) Late Sohan Lal Agrowal, aged ' \‘ abou’r 5O years, residen’r of Devendr‘a Nogar', Raipur', Tehsil and DisTric’r Raipur‘ (CG) WNW " aim'ai WWWW @ AM??? ¥2£4wm W20 3mw (W) :gwnarx' wiEa mgr mm#ww *wma > sag“ Ran‘ble $hri Justim Pretahant Kumar Mishra magma. $hr‘; $umesh Baja}, cwnsei fa" the petitiqher. The challenge. in thEs w 9‘“ Acids. msmc: Judge M§$ce%!aneeus Gm Appea¥ pfefan‘ed agains thE mm C appmat'mn mder Qrda' 3Q R mm} by the petitmnei $hri Sumesh Bah; cw suit §t$e¥f hat?) been aegided $ A I ‘ '%¥ patitmn ia the mm pa$$ed by ihe (FTC) Raipur 5n 98.€)7.2GQ9 in Namiw. The mid awew w&5 “12% Qrder dated 18.1%.2GGE on an la 1 fx 2 m é‘made 6f $lvil Frucewm Cm m www cf khe saw sw a5 infmamau‘s. Hawaven submit$ an appea! attmg wit inajunctim Qr'interim yekiaf, th mgrit w§§h€>u1 ba'mg Vin-man as mmcmsua sel l0! tha pelltlgner isuhmitg that lha wing the pentiency af me writ gaetlgian, its? tlw “want petltwn ‘5 chasm :sa 1 the went, tha p¥e$l3nt pam an appllaat‘mn m grant cf lempgmw $ame wall ha aanvslclered an lts marl} by the dl$mi5sal a? iha writ petllian ,_Sd//_ ,l‘ i Prashant Kumar Misrhra: ‘ \ _ Judge ’ a s r