1 cp244.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Contempt Petition No. 244 OF 2010 Smt. Kamble Vandana Vasant ....Petitioner v/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ....Respondents Mr. A.M.Joshi for the petitioner. Mr. R.M. Patne-AGP for respondents 1 and 2. Mr. S.V.Pitre for respondents 3-5. CORAM: R.M. BORDE, J. 8th November, 2011 PC: While permitting the withdrawal of writ petition, the Division Bench of this Court permitted the contempt petitioner to present a representation to the management and it was directed to the management to consider the same in accordance with law. The management was further directed to decide the representation within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt thereafter. 2. The grievance made in this contempt application is that inspite of presentation of writ petition, the management has not decided the same within the time frame prescribed by the Division Bench of this Court. 3. An affidavit-in-reply has been presented by the management and it has been brought to the notice of the Court that representation has already been decided, however, belatedly, and the reason has also been recorded as to why there was delay in rendering decision in the matter. 2 cp244.10.sxw 4. In these circumstances, I do not deem it necessary to take cognizance of this Contempt Application. The delay occurred in rendering decision in the matter stands condoned. 5. As has been observed by the Division Bench of this Court, the contempt Petitioner has liberty to adopt appropriate remedy as available in law against the decision rendered by the management. Contempt Petition stands disposed of. Notice issued to the respondents stands discharged. (R.M.BORDE, J)