CWP (T) No.10739 of 2008. 23.12.2010 Present: Mr. S.D. Vasudeva, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. After the matter was heard for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client shall be content if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s appeal on merits. Perusal of order dated 22nd May, 1993 (Annexure A-6), passed by the Appellate authority reveals that no reason has been assigned therein for rejection of the same. It is not a speaking order. 2. Consequently, on this short ground, as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner, order dated 22nd May, 1993 is quashed. A direction is issued to the respondents to decide the petitioner’s appeal on merits by passing a speaking order. 3. Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner assures the Court that the same shall be done expeditiously and, if, required petitioner shall be afforded an opportunity of representation. Needful be done within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the present petition stands disposed of. (Sanjay Karol), Judge December 23, 2010 CS