BEFORE THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR(C.G.') ' WRIT PETITION N0 ^4-2.2—/2QQ6 PETITIONER ^- ^^••••~ -^s? (; -^ '')"•" •••' ^\$-1-'' <" ''5-' .-••'.W Jeewanrekha Patel, W/o Sri Shyam ^^. zz:"":-:":^ ^i<J R^ONDENTS Sundar aged about 23 years R/o ViUage Palarikhurd, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir- Champa C.G. VERSUS 1. State of C.G. lln-ough Secretaiy Mahila ^avam Bal Vikash Matralaya D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur C.G. i^- ^2. The CoUector, Janjgii-Champa (C.G.) ^ 3. C.E.O. Janpad Panchayat Sakti, Disto-ict Janjgu-Champa C.G. 4. Project OfBcer, Mahila avam Bal Vikash Sakti Distnct Janjgir-Champa C.G. -- 5. Director Panchayat, Raipiff CUhatdsgarh. 6. Smt. Lakheshwari Bai W/o Masai Satnami ^~ aged 30 years R/o Village Palarikfaurd, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. . J\X_ _ -__ __— y XI-HC-22 TSI ^WvPf, 'S^ftWTSt fawi'ay sn^r^iT f^lTOSlRRI sh^iicn yt^fl V<WI Cbliqi '•^^.^?.^'").^.!;^l fa'b<it?' 3II^I'5SIIWHf??I 10 5.2006 Shri Abhijeet Sar'kdtf, Ady|: Shri AshutoshKschwaha, Learned counsei for the A oetition To counsei for the resoili of day. Heard learned counsei for By the instant petition thj vaiidltY iSi propriety of the o Director. Punehavat wherebv th> revision petition preferred by Aflditionat .Coijector', Janjgir-u flddiTiORai Coiiector in c^peliats the eetitions." on the eost of AO! Tahsii Sakti. &istrict Janjgir'-Chai]npa Sr'eT TacTS leading To Panehoyst Paisrikhurd mvited apjsii Kar/akarta in The sald PcnchGyal 1+ie petitioner herein wos appoin by th®said order of i^pointmet herein chaiienged the sarne by Collsctor, Janj9ir Champa, who +l'i|I<-t'ji)'< 'RPRff 4 'fe'st <r^1<$l< ^TSlpgii aii^i ?ovt. Ady. for rsspondent No.l, 2 4 & 5. ^eti+ioner to supply extni copies of Ths lindents No.l, 2, 4 iS S during the course I'he parties. petitiorier "as questioned the legeiity, 'der datsd 2&.4.2006 passed by ths Director, Panchayat had dismissed the •rtie pstitioner against the order of tiampa oated 6.9.2005 Whereby the liurisdicTion quashed the appoinTment of li.-.VQd! Karyakarta of Viliage Paiarikhurd. iiing of this petition ars 1^st >Sram. jsiications for iappointment of Agonwadi a",d cfter scrutiny of The cpphcations i^-ed on the said post. Feeling aagrieved ;tit of ttie petitioner. respondent No.6 4cy of an appeal before Ifie Additior.ai ids order dated 6.9.2005 qucshed ths [^ ^3<\ XI-HC-22 TS •^l^lci*), atil'y'is, fat'ii+iy sn^r ira^ an^i^T f^-li.i* 311^1 **i <i[?a ,.-...-t, 1 1 1I*1CTI (h*11ch "^ 200 •fq^T' sn^i wiTWtrt?^ •a appointment of petitionsr herein or) in yioldtion of Ciouse-5 of the Aggrieved by +he saici ordsr thi t'evision pe+i+ion before •itie Pcinchayat vide order dated 26.4.2( the petitioner on the ground 1Jnat before 1+ie i-figh Court bearing W.P. Learned counse! for The pei by the Oir-ectof, Panchaydt is pei^ without uoina into tiie msrit of petition bearing W.P. No.5333/0^ Additiona! t'oilector dated 6.S.200J order of OirecTor, PsnchayaT aDsiicatisn of the Detitione" he."sii"|. order of the t5irector. Panchayat is| I haye perused ths ord^r menticned that as the petitioner Court, Therefore, There Is no .lusTif! petition. I have also perused tiie record by ieamed coucisel forthe Perusai of W.P. No.5333/OS psti+tonsri hsrein aqainst th®orafs^ 'bllld-'il-t 111ci'f'?ftT^<r^t(K ^? sifigiT an^i the ground •Hiat same hae bsen mcde $over'nment Circular Dated 6.1.2000. petitionsr hersin has prsferrsd a Clir^ctor, Panchayat and the Director, '006 dismissed the revision DeTiTion of (fte petitioner has flled a writ petjtion lNo.5333/05. pTioner' argued T"ct The or.ae." passed peHver'se, as Ttie same has been passed re'ttision Detition. He further araued that was not filed against the -order of i, but -rtie same was fiied against •Ae dbTed 28.9.2005 rajecrinq ine sTay i|. Therefors. in the circun'.stancss ths impugnsd in which it has been has fiied a writ pefition befQps. thig :ica*ion in kssping pending The revislon copy of VV.P. No.5333/05 pfaced on etitioner'today'itseif. • shows thaT the same was fiiedby the ier datsd 28.9.2005 passsd by the [Tfry?^fe^ XI-HC-22 aiTCST^T W 3^V 5b^it^ <-f{^T \ >• Roshan/- ^ y^ ~:WvFf, dxil'y'id, ftini+iy sn^r IR^ *<I*ICT] sbi-irai 'WI. 200 (c|'b<ST' 311^1 ^iTW^lfpT •^ &ir4ctor Ojr'ecto!", Panchayat whersby th^ stay application of the petitioner| 6.9.2005 passed by the Addition(|i Therefore, the order of -tfta Dir^i and he ouoht to have decided Thel the soid revision was filed questicj? passed by the Additjonal Collector), As The order' passed by perverse, therefore, notices are (l 6. as the issuance of notice wou!(|! writ &ctition for no reasvns. Hot aggrieved by this order, they befors This CourT for r'ecaiiinq of 2n the "esu!-!-, the'.vnt petj' is quashed and tiie mafter is with a dirsct'on to decide ths on !TS own menr in accoraance u.'ifli In view of This ordsr.M.W.i Certified copy as per ruiss. cbl<4T<rl41'1 ^1+4^' ^ fs^ ^-(•ri.K ^73ri^PT3II^I &irector', Psnchayct had rejsctsd the and no rellef agsinst 'rtie order-dsted i Co!lector was sought in that pstition. ', Ponchayat is prima-face fsspverse. reviSion petition on its own irierit when ijng the merit of order dated 6.9-2005 tidnin |?he Director, Partchayct is prima-fccie (lot bein9 issued to respondents Mo.3 A further delctv the Drocesdinos of this ^wver, gtill respondenta No,3 a 6 fee! ijire at iiberty TO moye. on flppiication Irhis orde". jt.-oii is alio.ved. Order dated 26.4.2006 r^viSson back to the Director, Panchayat 'ision pstition of The petitionsr herein taw. . No.1833/06 stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [Tf^ ^fo^ V/