IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8870 of 2009 M/S JAI OM ENGICON PVT.LTD. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 4.8.2009 The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondent Chief Engineer-I, Rural Works Department, Patna whereby he has been refused to supply Bill of Quantity though the petitioner has deposited the requisite amount of Rs.5,000/- by way of Bank Draft. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would appear from Annexure-1 that 11.6.2009 was the date fixed for purchasing the Bill of Quantity and 12.6.2009 was the dated fixed for opening the tender. It would further appear from Annexure-4 that the petitioner filed an application annexing Bank Draft of Rs.5,000/- bearing D.O.No.908369. He submits that the petitioner could not have been refused to supply Bill of Quantity as every intending tenderer had a legal right to receive the same and denying the Bill of Quantity to the petitioner would amount to denying his right to participate in the aforesaid tender. He further submits that the respondents had acted in a biased manner to cause benefit to the favoured one. Learned State counsel submits that tender was opened on 12.6.2009 and by this time it must have been finalized. After hearing counsel for the parties, this court is of the view that if the petitioner files a representation along with a copy of this order raising all its grievance before the Principal Secretary, 2 KHAN Rural Works Department, Govt.of Bihar, Patna, respondent no.2, he will dispose of the same within three weeks from the date of its filing. In case he finds that any of the respondents has wrongfully debarred the petitioner from taking Bill of Quantity, he would take suitable action against the defaulting respondent and may take remedial measures so far as the petitioner is concerned. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J)