^Z^f^ IN_THEHON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMT PETITION (S» N0. 5lS 16 OF 2009 •....^^••\^- ^^^y ^ '^ly ^ Prakash Ojha son of Shri Satyadhar Ojha, aged about 41 years, Occupation serivefU.D.T.), posted at Vinobha Adiyashi Kanya Ashram, Jaisakarra, Tahsil Charama, District Kanker (C.G.). R/o village 8s Post Jaisakarra, Tahsil Charama, Distriet Kanker .(C 2-<---IshwsS'^aLJ3atgd>. son of Late Shri Manglul*Ra3^^tg.I, aged about 40 years, OScupS^jh Service (U.D.T.), Posted at.VinobKat:9|^.ivashiKanya Ashram, Jaisakarra, TahsU Charama, District Kanker (C.G.). R/o village 8s Post Jaisakarra, Tahsil Charania, District Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS -State of Chhattisgarh, 'through Secretary/:, T^ Etepiartine]^,: ;,'Mafitralaya,^.^ :'Sha^ari;'RaipuE(G,G.).l.;:.< 2. The Cpmimssioner/ ^iba]. Wel^ and Development, Raipur (C.G.), 3. Collecfor, District Collectorate, ^-/"Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.). 4, ..The Secretaiy, Mata Rukhmani f1'' Sewa Sansthan Saraiti, Dimrapal, Tahsil & District Jagdalpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONST!TUTION OIi' INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As given above in fhe cause title. ^ .©'^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTTPETmON ("S) No. 5616 of2009 PETmONERS RESPONDENTS Vijay Prakash Ojha & another. VERSUS State dfChhattisgarh & Others. Amit WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTtCLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K.Aenihotri, J. Present Shri Amiya Kant Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Law^-er for the State/respondents 1 to 3. s ORDERCORAL) ,<Passed on 2'5tn day of September, 2009) Heard leamed counsel for the parties. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Smt. A.Lall v. State ofChhattisgarh & Others , thus the petitioners may be permitted to make a representation to decide theircase in the light ofaforestated decision, subject to verification asto whefher the respondent No. 4-Institute is a Govemment Aided school and the petitioners are teacher within the sanctioned strength. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents 1 to 3 submits that in the event, the petitioners make a representation, the same will be corisidered and deeided, in accordance withlaw, within a period offour weeks fromthe date of . receipt ofthe representation. 3. In view of foregoing, according to the leamed couiisel appearing for the ^ petitioners, nothing survives in fhis petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. 4^STW 1..2007 (l)BLJ 265