IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2146 of 2008 HARENDRA KUMAR @ BIPUL Versus KUMARI PRIYA ----------- 2. 16.1.2009 Having perused the impugned order directing payment of Rs. 1200/- per month by way of maintenance by the husband petitioner to his wife opposite party as also the stand by the husband petitioner in the written statement alleging wife to be leading an adulterous life, this Court is satisfied that there was sufficient reason for the wife opposite party to live separately. Any such suspicion in a conjugal life against the wife by the husband or the husband against the wife can definitely cause rift in the matrimonial life and if on that count the wife-opposite party is residing separately and has no means of her own, she cannot be refused to be maintained by the husband-petitioner. The court below has gone into this factual aspect of the matter and has recorded its finding on the issue of negligence as also income of the petitioner. Nothing infact has been brought on record to contradict these findings of fact. That being so, this Court would not 2 find any reason to interfere with the impugned order and accordingly, this civil revision application being misconceived is hereby dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/