IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 5869 PETITION NO. 5869 PETITION NO. 5869 OF OF OF 2006. 2006. 2006. Smt. Chhaya R.Doifode ... Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents. Shri C.U. Pandey i/b Pandey & Co. for the petitioner. Shri Uday Warunjikar for the respondent No.10. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 4.9.2006. : 4.9.2006. : 4.9.2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned Counsel for the rival parties. Perused petition. 2. Looking to various prayer clauses incorporated in the present petition, the petition is not maintainable. Petitioner in this petition has even gone to the extent of challenging criminal proceeding initiated under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 3. It will not be out of place to mention that from time to time, the orders passed against the petitioner were subject matter of challenge in Writ Petition (St.) No. 22388 of 2004, which came to be disposed of by order dated 7.7.2003. All orders passed prior to 7.7.2003 are being challenged in this petition which cannot be entertained at such belated stage. Bonafides of the petitioner are also not clear. 4. In the above view of the matter, no case is made out to entertain this petition. Petition is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)