IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1745 OF 2005 PETITION NO.1745 OF 2005 PETITION NO.1745 OF 2005 Najodevi Brindrachal Singh ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Ms. Maharukh Adenwalla for the Petitioner Mr. A.Sayed AGP for the respondent No.1. Mrs.A.K.Savla, for respondent No.2. Ms. Kiran Bagalia, for the Respondent No.3. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: 25th SEPTEMBER 2006 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The petitioner claims to be the widow of Brindrachal Singh, who, it was submitted had a structure existing before 1st January, 1995 and as such was entitled for rehabilitation. An application was made to respondent No.3 dated 24th December, 2004. It is the grievance of the petitioner that till date the said application has not been decided. Considering the above we direct the Competent Officer of MMRDA to decide the application of the petitioner dated 24th December, 2004 after giving an opportunity to the petitioners within eight weeks from today. With the above observation petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)