HiOH COURTOF CHHATTiSGARH: BiLASPUR <S»n"!iai I-t&n/'-h • M^n'hlA ^hri \/i\sv l^iiiwar <£hrlt'5i<&fai/a -t ^^irgiti. fif^rii'^'s* * • t^r •i»l^»^^«*<ji »•J'MJr * »ti«rj<«**^riii iV^ut^vH'irO) v WR!T PETmOM N0.2878 OF 2005 Ahri-lla Vrniif r^tj^auiia i U^ui Versus State ofChhattisgarh & Othsr ~thORDER (Passed on 3'" day of February, 2007) AF^ H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BiLASPUR Singte Bench : HOn'b's Shri Vijay Kumar Shrivastaya, WRiT PETITiON N0.2878 OF 2005 Petitionsr: Abdulia Yusuf, S/o Lats Abbas Aii Aged about 74 years, R/o Baidev Bagh, Raj"andgaon_(C-G) ./ ^' ResooRdsRts Versus 1) Stats of Ghhattssgarh through Secretary Department of Town & Country P'anning DKS Bhayan Mantraiaya Raipur (CG). 2) Assistant Director Town & Country Planning QE Road Rajnandgaon 3) Coitector Rajnandgaon (CG). 4) Munidpal Corporation, through Commissioner, Rajnandgaon (CG). s.:-^: Present: Shri Nssiabh Dubey, counss! for fchs pstitioner. Shri AS Kachhavraha, Govsrnment Advocate forthe Ststei'rsspondsnts No.1 to3. Shri Sanjay K Agrav.'a! and Shri Saurabh Sahni, counse! for respondent No.4. ORDER -*R (Passed on 9'" day of February, 2007) This pstitson undsr Artids 226 of the Constifertion of India, sseking the fo!iowins rsiisfs: of ths 2) "Quashing demoliBor. nofce Commissioner of Municipal Gorporgtion dated 1-7-2(M5 bsihg Annsxure P-1 Oas s'lsga! and invaiid." &af*f'>^niar'.?i?4^ r^'?1**^'*'^*'^^ o<t!A^>t^^^4?I'»fa?l'5Q-ff-'!QC4i'Mi**^h^e<n<4 t'!>nrl >-<5iitiivil<?i vlMs? it?yi^i;oi s?%4 <»tfii^ U<;<?\|T Mtiii^U £ii?~v-i^^'t irfUi^ri ifi-aovi idi i^< admeasuring 722 sq. mtrs. sifcated atG.E. Ro&d, Rajnandgaon. Petitionsr in the yesr 2001 fited sn application before the Municipa! Corporation (hsnceforth "the CorporaSon") Sesking permissien to consfruGt a building ,.<-— o ovsr theiand. Vide permtesiori dated 10-4-2CSS1 the Corporation granted psrmission in accordance with various conditfons !aid therein. Ons of the conditions was that, the construction »kA**lrl I^n /4^k djivMivi W dons after teavingig an arsa of 22.50 mtrs. from the mid-road. When construcSon v.'as sn progress, the Corporation, finding viotaSon of psrmission, issued notice directing the pstitionsr to construct the bui"!di.".a in accordanc®wifh Gondition enshrinsd in ths permissio",. That notics ••••'as repissd by the pstitionsr vids tetter dated 31-1-2002. Petitionsr in his repiy statsd that teaving 5 mtre. of his fand he has started constructi'on and in cass hs is asketf to go bshind, he wi!! go back volunteriiy on hfe own risk. Ps{!t!onsr •A'SS again sewsd 'Aith notice ^rfa+S^ ^-7^nn? !!!^?'|nf ^/W+iin!.n '^ft? A^fh<& ft^P/r11/^ M!f*»i^Ersi!s! r^^ri^Ar-a+E^n &'*•* uuiis^ ^-* ~^^/\/£, Mitu^i ^^^H\/ij *A/? vi iii^ Wlf~~f\^\S ivi^iiiik/ijJGi K^iu?i ji/vi ctiiiVii /'i^t, •'tQKCt, fff\r Kr^'./ifi' "fhs &?*t ^Q^C)>\ *<nt ^h^yta* '"t!!^^ ^A'fr>»' ! fn^*!! i^ri'*/s''( i^ih/ih? \iVi ti/i^Vity U,j<? nvi, i^/w / i.t-f Siiyw ^xil.urf^ Wiiy UiiuUUivii^^y k^?<^t*"l */*fi'M^ o|^A|i|/4 w/t+ 1^^ r'a*n^*.'^&^ 'vi i^H iM^'uirfj i rfiivUiW iiVl i/^? i^iiiW<?vi. 'V\ D^tW^tV*^ir It^ +ttA \tQ,J9r ^/VIO ^(^t-'aiin •o»^i^l?.e.»*( ff\r /»tft^ri+ ^vf ^M ttl/'fli^, •*.'/ i-^Ui.iViis?i iii iij^ y^<fti ^.\/\f&, <iy«Miij Oii/ji/ii^^l ivi yiuili. vj i/UJiuiii; ^nnie^i^r* ff^r ''^n'rfM i?<4E^sn ^f fhs e&y\r<^! ftf^f^r f\n ^7-^'5^f\CY? Tha <?'ai/«t ;iiiii<3»»iviiivi ^Vfi^UU^Uvii Vi uivs s'ff^VijM iiWi vii j f~ i<-~£WA.. liis? d»uiu app!ica{!OR '.vas considsred and psrmission was granted vide order dstsd 1-1-2CX53 sufcyect to condiSon fhat he w", mske constTuCtion sfter teaving f'j cn mtrs. from the middls of the road as the road width is 45 mtrs. !t K pertinent to msntion hers that ths Departmsnt of Town and Gountry P.'anRina aiso objectsd ths sarifer consfructson and for subsequent cORStruction put a ridsr that the pstsftonsrshould msks construction tea<v'!"ng 22.50 mtre. from ths middte of the road. ^\ Daftfiy\n^r r<!i?J r<^+ rtK*^'** fha f>!iinii+i7 A:'f ^^?<<n!i*i/M^*a i»lnr»/\^^\^<I K*/ f^""k •^tf i ^iiHVjx-i uiW iiVi, vt/jc^ri uw3 vi.iiiyiiy vi wViiwiHvitO iiiipV^i^sU fc?y Ui^ ^f>tipif\/^r'intfvf\i^ ir< frtftiMin/r f^rtirn^Ii&oii/M^ UiO. *ii**a^ n^iitrt f'^^r^t^\^ \»tM^ »t/^<lt^k^s /4<a(v\i <w»vi|i/vj«tHVji iii 1/UiiUiiiy jk/<?i iiii^ajyii. n<? Y»u0 tiyuiii i^?iVii?\<* Wiui ii< ^^_^»_'7^/^C J'»IA?***|K' efr'l('lf'in^i +hQ+ tirf^ \ft^o r^^ti iIrA^I t/»wni^L'n /•/iiytff+n *^*4rS/Mi^ f/^*stMt^/< ^w-4i.W«b/^j^uify ^iiHiijjy Ui«Sit i i^? Vrud i<?\<Uiiii?w iv iiiur\<; Wi JSliUiLdiUi i j^?< ^n *^tfrJ^ fr<"s?»» f!^<a mi^^it^ ^^ f^a rA^>^<| !3a+if^^n^r rar^!iA?4 fA +I^^t i.wv ii>Ui». iiviii uiW iiijMwi^ Vi UiS? ivfiU. , r'^MHVff^i i^?i/il^?U iv Uis? area 22.50 mt M/\'^<»^ U'^i'ir*^ f^^i^c'iff^-ir^,^ +HA o^*>ytA i^<^<'if'i^*i»'*^r f.»'a»^t^'ainf ft^!^n»ii^/«It.an+H i^.n+^^^ li^i.i^v. i iuviijy \/vi i^iu^i <?w ui^^wiii^i/^iiUviiisi VTUO <aM6iiii S^siViyU Yviiji rt^t'^&fl ^ _7_'?^nC i»s ^sfvl^r t^\ .rir^st^t /M^t^Ar^ ii^ihr /\'f l^^\'sri>>»j"< +/^ ttinn iiiiwfhi. rA<"t'»r/it +A ll.^w i-/-£,w^»iti viuci IV yKiiii, Vjwrji/vi iiUjiifcy Vi iicCiiiiiy tv iiiiii ¥^iU(|i^yciivi i.v /.. Tt- remova! of unsuthorizsd construction under Ssction 307(2)(3) of the Act, 1956. Petitioner failsd to shov.' sufRcient cause and atee did not removs the unauthorized construcSon, thsrefore, his unauthorized constru'ction 'A'as iiabte to bs rsmoved. After due considsrafion in order to rsmove the ! lin'^1 lf'^»/MiT»/\/<(/*/M^<?l'r! l/'+lifMn /^-F +I^A l^^^+tf'I.AI^Ar l^*»l»i»»/^ f^f\v\^, ll^ 4 7'f 7ft' e'fv nntn jt/ii&^u ^/Vi i<>u Uk/UVi i Vi Mi<s? j/^uuvii^i iidViiiy ^*vif<tf iii i f i.rv ^Sij. of ths iand,.CRs! impugnsd noScs has beer, sswed on him. 5) Leamed eounss! for the petitioner vehemsntiy contended that the Corporation has ,"o right to put a rider fhat buiiding shouid bs constructed teaving 22.50 mtrs. from the middte of G.E. road, and that being iiiegai, petitibnsr cannot bs asked to remove a part of his consfruction. Learned 1/^ull /*/M «r><?^i ft^r ^k/s /^/'kri^^y^ttij^in /<t?\*^/\or<^t tkA ^•'ai'vi/i ^»n/<( ^^^srrf^Mt/jt^s^I tt»i+ 41 i^vUiiiX^i ii^i u ifci »/vit>/Via"ii/ji V^j^v^^u iiji^ ^uiiit? djiv* Wiiii.riiuou iiicii psrmi'ssion to construct the building '//as accordsd to petitioner in Si^/k^r^!^rf^ \*."fh I'ayj ^ii'»H /t^?"4>f'""<5 ims^/t^s^ *a»Af^ ir> a?*?*^nir'"!*>n'»s r»?ft< +b'& tti.fWiuui i^<? 1f»jUi ft.t8V aiiu wlJUiuvft? Jijit/t,'^^\ii Vr^i^? iii fii/^vivtCiii^^ yv'iiii itio ;t?*f!!f^r" m/*n^5*fflt fl><Arsf/^rrt ^» nAr^^n tMr/\'a|^?*»^n! tt**S !^f y»nn/<ii+ IPIA iii<ai jwfifcff) Hi^7iii;iVi<s, e pi.Si tfvii k/is?ul\iii^ Uis? i»W ^'uiii iVi i>/s? n^f^ts'sf^t^f^ ^>r*'4fhaw his'.'a •••i^hffft rAiivtAtyn+h^ * iwoi li'l^^ikri'^a^t ?*An«?+*^i^tiAn |i/itun.ic'^ri^?u uiiu Hi^jf tidvts iiyiiiiv i^iiiWf;? Hi<? vliifiuUiv/ii^^vt^viiSUw^Uvi'' fi\ C/\f (^y/M^A? •»!^ll'^*'^'*?'?ttI'ftF< ir^f +ttA ^itie>»^rrfn »ir/'»iHe*i/M^<?' A»^<^tt»-Ii^/\^l i f^/^ji^r v/ i-Vi |>/i vpiSi «KK'^^i""i^i i vj U JS? wi^t/uii;? pi s?vj^*t/i j^> ^i i^i ii ii isu ^a?*-tiAnc <?Q"^ +A QQ7 J?, ^H7 Af+b^ A^.f 4QCi£^ ^e. rAniiir&^I i-A K^ /*Anc.;.f4ArA^4 iw ti5^i^uk/ii& rf.^^/ iv ^^* ul %/Vf Vi iii^; r^^i, i??^?\? IS iS\4;uiiS?u iV ij^ LfVii5iy%?iSy iij •f^ !^+?Ar ^n/'f ^nirit A|i 4'h?^<£i& nfi'M"^*^!'^^ ^•**'A ^O! tA+^^1 I^^I^ita* ' ii.d l<i7U<;i C(ij%< ^ji/iiii, r-iii Uiv<><? |i;iV¥i^iViidui^ ^uvl%?w w^ivW . "283. Prohibition of erectio". or re-erecSon of buHdings v.'ithout permissiOR. - (1) No snall - psrson © (ii) erect or rs-srsct any buiiding; or vlvf^f. vf iW-^iv\fi commenceto erect orrs-erect any buiiding; or i/vj i jj i i^i i^r^; iv <?i ^irfi, or ^\r (JiO maks any msterial sxterna! aiteration te any building; or /»»A ^*/»r«?+yii/<+ ^sr y¥/ ^vi i&u Lj^ri, Vi r^_f*-f\v\^tvt t^*+ i s?-k/vi i^tj t^i^i, sny isctins j>/i\/j<?Mtiiiy portion of a building whjch me Commissioner is smpowsred by ssctio" 305 to fscjuire to bs sst bsck or is empowered to give permissionto ^pnstruct or re-construct, — i( . ^ (a) untess ths Coromissioner has eithsr by an order jn writing granted permjssion or has failed to iH^msts within ths sfsscribsd o©nodhis "sfu^sl of permission for the erection or Te-ereCtion of the building or for the cOnstructjon w re-construction of ths projscting part ofths buiiding; i^inn' ^p expiry of one year from th®date of (b) after the the said permission or such longer peripd as the Comniissionsr "n3y slEow or from ths SH^ of th@ prescribed period, as the case may be; Providsd that nothing n this section shaiiii appiy to any work, addition or alteration whicn the Corporation may by bys'awdec'grs to bs exempt. (2) !f a quesSon arises whether a psrticular alterafion in eraddition to an existing ouikting is oi- is not 3 nistsria! sitsrs^on ths nisttsr wit! bs ifar?¥»«n^i"iH*i? +^*A ^ft*vti USi.^iijjjiityvii uy ui<? v/^iiiiiii<»^ii 4jiiiii<»^twiitSi (3) Ar.y psrson aggrieved by ths ordsr of ths Commissioner in this behaif may appeai to the districf court withi" thifty days of such ordsr in th@ manner prescribed therefor and the decision of the district court sha!! be final. 294. Notice of buiidings.- (1) Evs"/ person who intendstoerectorre-erectabuiidingshaiisubmitto ths Cofflniissionsr— /9\ I."/ an appiication in writing for approva! ofthe sits toflether with a site plan of{heland;and in the case of land which is ths pfQpsrty of fhs Goysrnment or Qf the Cprporation, a Certified cqpy of tne dbcumenis authorteing him to occupy ths land, and if so required bythe Commissioner the origina! document or documents;arid (b) an appiication in wrftins for psrmission to build together with a groundpian, elevation and section of ths buildifig s"d a spscification of ths' work to bs done. (2) Ever/ plan of any bu';!ding te bs constructsd wholiy or partty of masonry, submitted under sub- SQC^'Q" ^I1) shsH. in toksn of its hsyinG b©srt prepared by nim or undsr his supervision, bear the signatiire of a liwnsed surveyor. (3) Every document submittsdundsr sub-ssction (1) shail be prepared in such manner and shaii coniai" such particu'arsas "'ay bsprescribed. ) (4) Nothing hereir. contained sha!! rsquirs a person tocompiywith theprovjsions of ctause (b) of sub-ssction (1) unti! such time as the sits^ has^seen approved by ths Commissioner or such person as he may appoint. ^ 295. Com.Tiissiener to reftise e.-sctioR or re- erection of buildings.—(1)The Commissioner shai! refuse to sanctionthe erection orre-erection of any bui!di"g i" contraventio" o? any scheryie sanctioned undersection 29't or in contravention of any ruie or bys'aw made undsrthe provisions ofthis Act. (2) TheCommissioner mayrefusstosanctionthe erection or re-erectiQn of any building if in respect of ths byileliFtd th©r©srs suflicisnt rsssons whfch shsf! be communicated in wriiing to the appiicant, why sanction shou'd not be g'ven, or ifthe land on which ;{!"s propossd to srsct or re-srsct such buHding is vested in the Governmentor in the Corporation and the cbnssnt of ths Govsrnmsnt or ths C-orporation, asthe case may be, has notbeen obiained.orif ihe tJUe to the !and is in dispute betwsen the app!lcant >rl +hA r^^m^r-sfinn .At" i^ /^ :^r!^<^r-iaT«/M^ /^t" TW^ f ^,f\\f^miHM^v*< j%* uW v-'vilxH/j^Uvii vi U i<? \.?WSjjiiiii>?iii,. (3) M^1tr."'tt»e^l»^i»*tll^^l«^&i^i,«4't>I»tr< ^<% iiivMMfiU i.aitfii iwii iy ui iyu iii iy ^v contai"iSd in sub- section (2) but subject to the provisions pf sub- sscBon (10) of SeGtion 2Q1 if the C-ommissionsr within thirtydays of the receiptfromany person pfa valid notice of such oerson's intention to erect or re- sreet a buiiding, or within sixty days ofsuch rsceipt if the notice relatesto a building on thesame or part of ths s3fns sits on which ssnetion for th©srsctton of 2 buiiding has bssn rsfysed 'ATthinths pre'^ous tweh/s months, negiects or omitsto pass orders sanctioning or rsfusing to ssnction sych erQctiQR or rs-srsctio"; such erection or re-erection, shaii, uniess the iand on which itis propossdto erect or rs-erect such building beiongs to or vssts in s Corporation, bs deemed to have been sanctioned, except in so far ?i*s H" mav nnntrawianiia anv Ynila^ nir huolaiw or any vwt lai *N »a^, ttrf •oi ij ^i *<>•»// t^f •i»jirf>**»»»»i *•* <J town pianning scneme sancnQned under this Act or any other enactment forthe ttme beina in foree: Providsd tftat if an order granting-or rsfusjng such sanction issuspended under Section 421 the psriod sp8C!fisd by this sub-ssction shs!! conimence to run afresh from ihe date of communication of finai ordsrs under the said sanction bv the Govsrnment. 29S. Orounds On which sifs of proposed building may be disapproved.--The Connmissionsf niay on 3!! pr a"y of th©fo!!owi"g grounds refusedto approve the site on which an proposes to erect or re-erect any K! iti/^*y\f*. ii/uiiviii iy~- (a) that ths srsctiOR or re-ersction of ths proposed buiiding on such site would be in contraysntion of a tow" planning schef"s under Section 291 or of any othsr provteion of this Act or of any other enactmentfor the time being in force; or l^ (b) that ths site is in a portion within fhe limite of the city in which the Rosition and direGtion of the strssts hsvs not bssn dstsrniinsd snd thst ths buiiding 'A'hich it fe proposed to ersct on such site will, in the opinion ofthe Commissioner.obstruct or jntQrfere with ths CQnstfuctloR I" <ytur©of sultab!0 streete in such portton or with ths dramags, 'A'ater supply or ventilation thereof: Dr/S* n.^f^^^I i-iWiw^u A- 'rovided thatany person te whom permtesioR to ereGt or re-erect a building on such a site has J3QQ" rsfussd nisy. fcy wnttsn notics to ths Cpmmissioner require that ihe position and direction of streets to be latd down in future jn the vicinity of ths propossd buiiding shou!d bs forthvAh dstermiRS, and it such requisition is notcomplained with within QHQ yggt ITO"T! ths dafs thereof, ni3y, subjeGt to a!! other provisions of this Act applicabie thereto, procesd with ths erection of his building; or /r-\ I.W that ths sjte has besn reciaimsd or used as a place for depositing sewage, offensive matter or rubbish or th©carcassss of dsad anin'isls or is otherwise insanitarj'ordangerousto healtti; or (d) thst the site i's in a portion v.";th!R the iimits of the city for which a tOwn planning scheme has not ^Qgn ganQtjQnecj by ths GGysm"1isnf 3"c! thst ths buiidingwhich it is proposed to erect or re-wect on suchsjtewil, jntheopinionoftheCQmmissioneF, be iiksiy to conflictin a raanner, to be communicated in writing to the applicant, with the provisions of a town nianntnn <aftnoma- 'lwr'"*'* Pr^rt"?4&<4 +h.-st i»t*/^»viin>i Provicieci tf.at any person to whom perrnission to erect or re-erecta building on sych a site has bsen refussd msy, by writte" "otics to th® Commissioner, require that thepreparation of a town pianning schems for the portjon in which the s.ite is suitabte sha!! bs procesdsd with as eariy as possibie; and if the atwlicant is not informed in ".'"ting ".'ifchi" tl"s!"§ months of ths dats of ths requisinon that the Goyemment have sanctioned the said town pianning scheme, he may, subject to a!! other prowsfons of this AcS appiicabte thsreto proGeed with the erecnon or re-erection of the bui!ding in rsspect of which ths spptjcstio" wss made. 287. Grounds OR wbich (^rmission to erect or re-erect building may be rerused—tl)The Co"im*ss!onef shsil! notgrsint psrr"!ss!on to ©rsct6r re-erect any buiiding unless and untii he has apprwred ofths site thereofon anjipplication under Section 294. DJ £.W. '7 (2) The Commissionsr shal! not grant permission to erect or re-erect any Dujlding,— (a) if the plans and specificatsons submittsd •A";fh the appiicatjon show that such buiidinfl is not in SCCOfdSRCS WJtfl 3 IQWR DlSHfllflG Sf^lSHflSd sanctioned under Sectibn 291, orWitn any provision of this Act, or any ru!e or byelaw mad®thereunder, or any provision of any iaw for ths time bsing in torce; or ^» t' :1 (a-1) if in his opini opinionthe ersction or re-ersction of such building would be a nuisance or injurious to the inhabitants of the nsighborh.ood to thspub'ic; or (b) u ktA< k»<^I i jii«?SS ui iu tii'i+il •?»niL? nf»»ne ei^n^ifi^^+i/srko ^si uiiUi utiy |^i<ajj3i) 3'ii/^^'iii^rtitUviid v* particuiars calied fpr by him are supplied. 307. Pswer te require remova! or aiteratSon of work not in CQnformity with byelaws or any scheRis or any othsr rsquirefnent.'—(1)!f any buiiding is erecieid or re-erected in coniraveniioniof anytown plannmn sche"ie mentioned undersectinn 291 or of any buiiding bysiaws mads underssction 427, Ihe Commissioher 'without prejudice to his right to taks procsedings for a fins !R rsspsct of the contravention, may by notjce require tne owner sither to pu!l down or remove ths work or, if he so JA^*<» ff\ ^fF^fi^' e* i.^l^i ^aI'tAr'sti^M^ +t».Ai^^»i»i >M^ii «aiiSi<iuVii ui^i^iii as may be necessary to make it comply witn the said scneme Of l^yelsvt^. (2) !f a buiiding is erectsd or re-srected— (a) wifchout any sanction as rsquired by section 293(1), or (b) (c) r'hiiQn <l"3»%^<+i^M^ i^tc> fri^»/\»<r.nftt^/^jpt /^r 'lwil<?jj Si<ti jihrUvii iitiitf kn?oii i^iy&^w, Vi in cont{ravsntion of ths terms o 't'tt^ *oir»y»e ^vF ^gini.r e^t^y'1'i/sn u fiS uSil i i0 Vt fii iy Stiii iii^Uvi i granted, or (d) when ^-'>y?*4'^S!'* hse !J'*t^*sArl > irt^i^f <'Aj~ti^<kn iiruvii ii€%^> j<i*|i/5f^w viiiU^i ^^ik/UVii ^/W) the ComraissioRsr, unlsss he deems it nscsssary to take proceedings in respectpfsuch building orwork under sect'on 294, sha!!- (a) by '.vritten notice, requirs the psreon who is erectingsuch buildingor executing suchwork orhas srectsd such buHding or exscutsd such uiork on or before such days as shaii be specified in such notice, by a statement in writtng subscribed by hjm or by an agent duly authorizsd by> him in that bshaif and acklressed to the Commissioner, to show sufHcisnt C3US0 why such buiiding or worR shsHnot be removed, aiteredor putlea.dQwnLO!L, (b) shail rsquireths said psreon onsuch dsy and atsucn time and place as snall Despecmed In sucn notsce to attend psrso"a!!y or by an ageRt du!y authorized by him in that behaif.and showsufRcient cause why such building or work shal! not be removsd, aitered or puiied down. (3) !f such person faifs to sho'.v sufficient cause, to the satisfaction of the Commissioner, why such building orwofkshaHnotbe fsmoysd, atsrsd or pulied down, the Commissioner may remove.aiter nr pull down ths buHding or work andthe expenses thersof shail be pajd byths psrson. (4) ths !f the pfans ars (spproved) by Commissioner and the approval iscommunicated to ths PQFSQ" intsndlRg to bui!d ths houss or if ths pians are rejeciea' by tne Commissioner bui no notice of thsir reisction is aiven to Derson intendina toto buiid ths house within ths prsscribed psriod if shali not be open to the CommissJoner to give a "otlcs undsr syb-section (1) ssnd (2) on ths ground that buiiaing is arectsd or re-erected in contravention of any schems or byslaws or any othsr requirsments under nderthischspter. ipii (5) NofrAithstanding in this ssctfon sha!! affectths rightoftheCorporationoranyotherpersontoapply frofhio D'slrict Court fpr srs .'"junctio" fofihs rejnova! or aiteration of any buiiding onthe ground ttiat it contravsnes any provisjons of tliis Act or the byete'.vs mads thereundsr, but if fhs buiiding is ons in respect of which plans have been deposited and fhe plgns hsvs bssn psisssid by ihs Co'nmissionsf, or nonce that they have been rejeeted has not been gjven wthin the prescribed period after the dsposit thersof, and if the 'Awk has been executed in accordance with the pians, the District Court on gfantiRg 2" jnjunctiQp shall have power to ordsr tha Corporation to pay to the owner of the work such compensation as ths District Court thinks just, but bsfore makj,"g any such ordsr the District Court cause me uommissioner ir not a party to De joinea ss 2 party to ths procssc'ing." Upon conjoint rsading of aii thoss provjsior.s, !t unveils that the ^n^i^ h !c:?<!!^+iAn fift -B^^ftr^"! n^ +^ l;ommis3ioner nas no power or jurisciiction to accord pe,''m!3S!on {o construct a buiiding in v'ioiation of to'A'." pianning scheme sancSoned undsr this Act, any rute, byeisws or any other enactment for the tims bsing !R forc9. tW Q .-'T- 7) Undisputediy Rajnandgaon Dsvstopment Pian, 2001 has been publishsd in accordance wsth Section ISsub-section (5) of ths MP/CG yam, Nagar Tattia Gram Nivssh Adhiniyam, 1973 (for brsvity "the Adhiniyam, 1973") and the sams came into sxistsnce with effsct from 8-12-1993. The land bsionging to the petitionsr falte within G.£. Dosc? - F.C.I. Gockfwr, Msig Sangam Se NslaGhat Msrg SsFyam Thak and ths width of road has bsen pubtishsd 45 mttrs. Ssctson 25 of the Adhiniyam, 1973 resds as beiow: "25. ^rviiiviiiiii,; 'ith devslopment p!sn.-(/•IV After the coming into force of the cievelopment plan, ths us©snd dsy©t(?0ms"tof Isnd shs!! confQriTi to the provisions of ihe deveiopment pian: (Providsd that the Ziia yojans Samffi, may, as its discretion, permit the continued use of iand fpr tho niirrwae fnif iwhifh tt utfcit? hoinf* i!«aari af thQ tim<s ffWffWW IV <1*III'W*I Ih ••*<»»a*wr ig Mi/»/*a •<» •11 t */ w«'w of the comirig inio operation of the deveiopment nlan'y Provided furthsr that such permission shall not be grant^a tor a penod exceeding seven years fr-om +hs jjg^Q Qf comihg into opsrstion of ths devetopment plan. (2) Not'A'ithstanding anything contained in section 172 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1Q5Q /No-20 of 1Q^^ eyerunsnmissiQn to '*""*' \'•**"^*' <•" •*»"»*'/WWJ ffVtf*f*WW f.V »It»*^t«,.*-II*-*« granted under that section shaii be subject to the nrovjstons of this.Act." 7*h& flHftva r^r^i*.."^*^?' '*'!&<**'lv Ksr*? ?*Ar>*sfr! !?*f?ftn ^i*hA*^j>n<aA +^''>i^ ii t 1 K? fiiww i/lwj^ivij vis?ai ijf ii/uii> \ivj i£i»HuvijVi i vUis7iWii>^? uitiiii accordance 'A'ith the dsvsiopmeRt pian in foree. Thsrsfore, Commtesionsr, Coi-poratio". was not empov.'ered te grant psrmission to construct a buiiding ?»*'^r ^*A !snrl ia.'h*^K €af!e ""tHi?» +!^^ !Nkr/^/*in'»* ^? nrAnifse'A/'! jr/'i's/'l -•aw^t vwi u i<? itfiiiui Vviii^it i^iiS tViitiHi Hi>^ »/ioviii^i vi ih/iUi/va%?U ivtity uiiu i.?l?k/\F^II"^r«l*.< - i**<*^ ii^/»iinn^^nf iin^Ms 1»>!»*»+A /<tr*a»^+ i^i^rrvti^<^iAn TiiVt»\/^»i>^^* ii. Kiru^ iij^ujjiii/i^ijtUji/vji iiiiii iV yiuiit, pwi i i ii&5ivi i iiiipv&iriy '*i^?I^H'+*^?* +^*'?if ^'Mt^+l^! !^+>^M^ <sl^^!il.rf ^^ iw^^f^/^ S^\^\fir\fv ^'7 C/1 »v»+r<? ^^f W»/^ I'ai^; ^rViiuiUvii Ui<;.ti. k/viiiauu^uvii &ii^wiu w iiita\<S? iSuviiiy ^£.^»vliii.iS. vi iliS? fr^w* m?^/*!!^ fvf th-a r^^t^ fiviii iUiuUi^ ^f uW ivuu. 8) Hers i*> I'srtf "s! *f /t? i^i li i^ iivi ^/Mi, vi '£!i fhi?f •?» tf^/tFH'!*!1^?1^ ^Sflfh <G^f+i/\r* '5& ^i^ *)"^ yiw^v uidi.iii d^^vi^icii ik^? iffiij j ^sAruVii Av vi ii iv A/?h'nit?5*T* ^Q7^ r's^fif'/M^sr h^*o <*!<£/'» ^* r!i!+i< n/^+ f^i /»li>'an/<(A ^A •lo/s Af t^M/4 r-iutittjtiytiiiii, *»/*^/ ji/iSUHVij<?j ii<<it? fiti?v «.< Uui.y i iVi. iv }^i iui iy^? ii jS? y^<? Vi iufiu Jt o A^ Without prior permission of ths Director, in writing. CommissJoner, CorporaSon granted psrm-'ssion on 10-4-2(x31after recsiving no obj'scSon from the Nazui Deparfment and ateo msRtioning that the psrmjssion !3 subject to AdhJR!y3m,19?3. Evsn in specific tsrm it has besn msnttoned that it is necessary for the petifioRer to compiy MP Co!onyAdhin"/am, 1988, MastsrPlan Proposa!, 2001, M.P. Land Devetopmsnt Act, 1984 and rufes framsd thereundsr. Hs v/as aiso directsd to observe Shs rutes regarding environment. 9) Petjtjoner did not chaitenge the vaiidHy of the permission in accordance with fte provteions for appea! or othsnw's®in accordsnce with the Act, 1956 and sterted censtructioneven assuring ths Corporation that on being asked by the CorporaSon hs wi!! rsmove the consiruction. Whe.n he further sought psrrRission for construction of oftier floor, the psrmission was accorded by ths Corporation on 1-'!-2003 witti a condition thaf hs shoufd construct toaving 22.50 mfrs. of iandfrom mjddte ofths road and this permissioR *A'as aiso subject to condigons iaid do'.vn by Assistant - Director, Tov.'n and Country Planning Department, Rajnandgaon datsd 17-12-2002, whonot on!y directod but aiso marksd with rsd ink up to which construction couid be dons^i.e.to say that the Department of Tc'.wi and L/<i> t'^ivt' DI'''>»»!^??»/«• D'tIn^tn/'l^'t't/M'^ *^^in' e*^a^*W»»^llt»i^r^Mt^i'trt^ 4t»A. v\wt-Wf\v*^\f •VuiiHy r-«iiiiijjiy, i^siJiiCtii^ytfii^ii vvfi'y 5>frif^?M*jivujjy ji/fviiii/ii^u uiv ji/Sfiiiiyjj^i from consfrucfing v/iUiin 22.50 mtre. of tend from ths middis ofthsroad. Permission 'A'as not chslisnged bsfore any aathority tiii aftsr due hearins ths in; k4<<kr»+ removai nottee of 2005 has bssn saroed onthe pstitioner. 4/^V Gj^i'Wf^w^.ff*' ftir^l^/^r j»j"iin+An+I'\»< ?e +(Ti<>at fr/Miwt +t%A <4*a+^t A^ irti+I^>( i\// i-^?iiijVii^t ^ jwii,i(t?t ^'Viji.^iju'^ji l'3i tiitSi iiVHi i.ii'i? Udi<? '•'i iUiuiili (^^r»¥t?ojei^iir<+^*^ /^^m^r^+i/\n <*+n?+A'^ )neit*+i»t.n +fc(^+ tt»A ^i^M^e'l'rt in+i>»n I^A f4f\n, ji/^jttiiiy^iVii Uj^? </Vi |^viciit\/ii Suiii I'tfM iliSiSUijyUjtfii, UJ*?^vii3iUUk*uvii h/i l»t? ^Lift^i «rip<r«litt^t+ fr/snn t'ts^ /i.ftit+j^r /\f +t^A cn-ntrt r^/a^'1 IIH <a /4iu'fr^j]n/»A ^vf '*?' t/y ^Fi i<>Mi iiiy (,ji(fiii iiViit ui^ u^i iiisj t/i ui'Vf iiicaiJi ivtfiu Uii *» wi2fuaiii/ii? vi| ££>^>/i mtrs. no construction be done. Ths land betongs to hjm and Without acquirina hi's iand Gorporation has no right to imposs condjtjon, dissnfiUing p- 1 1 tti»v» f-/^ rf^ni/^ir l^ie^ l'at^/4 'a/^'vi^ooi irirt.rt 'l 7'1 <?/<( fy^trt^ iitrh t^iilk* if" te tv^^lir^^' iiiiii iv ^siijvy ili5f *"iiu uUiiis7Utyuiiiiy if * Svi. itiua., Viiiuuiiy ii, i^ *ijs<ti^^v acquisition of !and. On the other hand, it '.vas opposed by tearned counss! fer the respendente. 11) La'.v »M-/^hil^ito /i/MTi^tn i.»*4i/^in f*itfrii/M i+ ^«t<t» i^Ari^*<<•<<•t^rt A*^M t/ivi iii./ita LiVi i^u uk/Uvi i iMfiutVUi wM^ p^i iiii5>^iiVii iivi the Commissioner, Cororporation and Com.-nissioner has no right to srant permission against law of ths land, ths thsrefors, in aceordsRcs with [aw he ^'lirAr^+^k/4 <Ik/^ i^^s4111'i/>i»*^^r +/i ^/^r'o^yi "lt t^^ I'M iiMiyi^t »»fi'^t» uiv yvuuviwi IV k/vjjSHu^ii Uio- k/uiiuil 'ft/sy 1/&avms 22.50 mtrs. .1- x^r iivlii iiiiviviis? iddte of the road. The land stiil bsiongs and ovms to ths pstitionsr, it is not taksn a'.vay by the Corporation State or other authoritiss. E?A^fri^fi<"in f^r ^^n^t?'* !^tf'i^*n f\\f^f '! 7'1 *>f* ?¥*+'» ^f +hQ I?*?"^ "jhi^H fa!!c ^s'! 'uvii ivi ^ViiSUu^iivJiws?i i i s <?i>4. iiiUiy. Vi Uj<? juiiw, vifiii^ii jd Wlliiit