AB 1632/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. BARUAH Heard Mr. B.M. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Since Mr. B. B. Go goi, learned Addl. P.P., Assam accepts notice for the State respondent, no fresh notice is called for under the circumstances. As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, this petiti on is taken up for disposal at the order stage. This petition is preferred for modification/alteration/correcti on of the order dated 8.8.2011 passed by this Court in connection with AB No. 16 32/2011. By the aforesaid order, this Court directs the petitioner herein to app roach the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned for regular bail and to f acilitate him for the purpose, the petitioner was provided interim bail until 23 .8.2011. In other words, the interim bail provided vide order dated 8.8.11 was e xtended upto 23.8.11. By virtue of the petition, the petitioner contends that the order was passed by this Court in bail application No. 1632/2011 having not indicated disposal of the bail application, the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate raised a question about the status of the anticipatory bail being no. 1632/11. Under the facts and circumstances, the petitioner prays for modi fication of the order dated 8.8.2011 indicating therein that the bail applicatio n stands disposed of accordingly. Mr. B. M. Choudhury, learned counsel represen ting the petitioner herein submits the order may be modified as prayed for in th e application. The learned Addl. P.P. representing the State respondent in vi ew of the contention raised in the petition, has not resisted the application an d concedes the submission advanced by Mr. B. M. Choudhury, learned counsel for t he petitioner. Taking note of all the facts in its entirety, this petition s tands disposed of with the following addition. The order dated 8.8.11 be read as under. Accordingly the bail application stands disposed of.\ This misc. case stands allowed and disposed of accordingly.