IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.22150 of 2011 Date of decision : 30.11.2011 Ramesh Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.B.R.Vohra, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. This petition has been filed with a prayer that the petitioner be treated as a Mortar Mate. The respondents have declined the prayer on the ground that the petitioner was working as a Mate and there was no occasion to treat him as Mortar Mate simply because a clerical error had crept in in his service-book. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he was in fact working as a Mortar Mate. The petitioner by his contention has revealed to the Court that he was designated as Mate and not as Mortar Mate even though there is some material describing that his services were regularised as Mate and not as Mortar Mate. The muster rolls upon which reliance has been placed by the petitioner is merely indicative of the fact that as the petitioner was employed on daily wages, he probably might have been employed as Mortar Mate but the C.W.P.No.22150 of 2011 -2- first and foremost document upon which credence can be placed is the order of regularisation which has regularised the services of the petitioner as a Mate. There is thus no ground to interfere. Dismissed. 30.11.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss