SUIT1625-10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.1625 OF 2010 Ram Motumal Chugh .. Plaintiff Versus Saranga Estate Pvt.Ltd. And Ors. .. Defendants Ms.Prachi Khandge i/b. M.P.Vashi & Associates for plaintiff Mr.A.B.Dubey for defendant No.2 Mr.T.P.Gujjar i/b. Ashwin Ankhad for defendant No.1 CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 23rd September 2010. P.C.: 1] Plaintiff is present in court so also the representatives of defendants and their respective Advocates. 2] It is stated that the plaintiff's grievance and complaint with regard to the construction commenced by the first defendant pursuant to the agreement with second defendant society, are fully redressed and settled. The agreement arrived at by parties in that behalf is recorded in the terms. These terms have been fully explained to the plaintiff and defendants. After perusing them, they are satisfied that the terms record agreement between them. SUIT1625-10 2 3] Plaintiff withdraws all complaints made to the Mumbai Municipal Corporation and its Executive Engineer with regard to the construction and has stated that he will have no objection if the occupation certificate is granted. He is also satisfied with the monetary sum determined for the alleged blockage of light and obstruction to the free flow of air. 4] In these circumstances, the consent terms, which are duly signed by plaintiff, defendants and their respective Advocates, are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. There will be an order in terms of consent terms. The suit is accordingly decreed and disposed of as such. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)