IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.:3366/2008 Decided on: 4.3. 2009 Smt. Vijay Chandla. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1. No. For the petitioner : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. A.G. and Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy. A.G. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The petitioner was transferred from Sub-Centre, Anandpur to Sub- Centre, Solang on 1.4.2006. The Block Medical Officer, Mashobra relieved the petitioner on 12.5.2006. Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate submitted that his client could not be relieved without serving office order dated 1.4.2006 on his client. He has further submitted that the peitioner was on polio duty with effect from 19.5.2006 to 25.5.2006. According to him the order dated 12.5.2006 (Annexure A-1) was served upon his client on 24.5.2006. Once the petitioner has been transferred vide office order 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 dated 1.4.2006 and she has been relieved of her duties, she has not made out any case for interference. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. 4.3.2009 (Rajiv Sharma ), J. *awasthi*