1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. S ST/3898 OF 2011 IN SECTON APPEAL NO.639 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.75 OF 2011 IN RPSST/3898/2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.639 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr.V.S.Deokar, for the petitioners. Mr S.S.Shah, for respondent no.1. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 23/11/2011 PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. Mr Deokar, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions from the petitioners who are present in the chamber, prays for withdrawal of this Review Petition with liberty to the petitioners to adopt appropriate remedy in the event their Revision, being TEN/Revision/ Solapur/ 158 of 2003 is T 2 allowed by the Commissioner. That Revision application is against the order dated 26.8.2003 passed in Appeal No.8 of 2002 filed before the Sub-Divisional Officer, Pandharpur Division, Pandharpur challenging the 32G proceedings which were concluded in 1964. The prayer for condonation of delay in filing the appeal was rejected by the order dated 26.8.2003. Mr Shah, learned counsel for the respondents, submits that as of today it cannot be stated that a challenge to the order under section 32G and the certificate 32M is pending before any authority. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the Review Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. It is open to the petitioners to adopt appropriate remedy, if so advised, in the event the aforementioned Revision pending before the Commissioner and Appeal No.8 of 2002 challenging the order under section 3 32G and the certificate 32M are finally allowed. If the petitioners adopt any such remedy, the concerned authority/court shall consider the same in accordance with law. It is made clear that as of today no proceedings are pending in the High Court and/or no order of stay of execution of the decree, that was under challenge in the Second Appeal is operating against the decree holders. In view of disposal of the Review Petition, Civil Application No.75 of 2011 does not survive and is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) 4