1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1992 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8651 OF 2005 Vilas Sonaba Purekar .. Applicant versus Amar Dattatraya Salokhe & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.S.S.Patwardhan for the applicant. Mr.Rahul P. Walvekar for the respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 17th September 2009. P.C.: . Heard learned advocate appearing for the applicant. The applicant is the respondent-original plaintiff in the writ petition. A decree of eviction has been passed against the respondents in the civil application which is challenged by them by filing the writ petition and decree for possession has been stayed. A prayer in this application is for vacating the interim relief of stay on the ground that the tenants have carried out construction in violation of order dated 10th July 2008 passed by this Court. The allegation in the application is that the tenants have carried out and completed construction of drainage and pipeline on the front side of the suit premises. Perusal of the photographs annexed to the civil application shows that a pipeline was laid by the tenants for connecting the toilet in the suit premises to the drainage 2 line. The communication annexed to the civil application issued by the Municipal Corporation shows that now the said drainage connection has been disconnected. The order dated 10th July 2008 puts restraint on the tenants from carrying out repairs in the suit premises. The allegation in the application is that a pipeline was laid by the tenants outside the suit premises for connecting the toilet in the suit premises to the municipal drainage. 2. On the basis of the averments made in the application, no case is made out for vacating the interim relief of stay. Application is rejected. (A.S.OKA,J)