IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPs No. 297, 298 and 300of 2011. Decided on: 21st February, 2011. 1. CWP No.297 of 2011. Nar Singh. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 2. CWP No.298 of 2011. Netru. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 3. CWP No.300 of 2011. Sham Lal. Vs. State of H.P. & others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Pushpender Singh, Advocate vice Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petitions are filed with the following prayer: “1. That appropriate writ, order or direction may kindly be issued and the respondent department may be directed to regularize/confer workcharge status to the petitioner after completion of 8 years of daily wage service will all consequential benefits in view of the judgment rendered by this Hon’ble Court.” 2. The petitioners claim regularization/work charge status on completion of eight years of continuous service as daily wagers. According to the petitioners, the issue is 2 covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No.2735 of 2010, Rakesh Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred above by the petitioner concerned. 3. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 21st February, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge. 3 4