THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY Crl.P.Nos.7214/2007 & 5708/2010 Dt.11-11-2010 Crl.P.No.7214/2007: Smt. Chandrakala ..Petitioner/A-7 V. 1.Orchu Venkata Lakshmi and another. ..Respondents The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY Crl.P.Nos.7214/2007 & 5708/2010 COMMON ORDER The petitioners/A-1 to A-6 in PRC No.16/2006 on the file of the I Additional Munsif Magistrate, Narasaraopet, who filed Crl.P.No.5708/2010 to quash the proceedings initiated against them in the said case, seeks permission of the court to withdraw the criminal petition. The petitioner/A-7 in the above case filed Crl.P.No.7214/2007 to quash the proceedings initiated against him. The allegations levelled in the charge-sheet would clearly disclose that A-1, who is the husband of A-7, got admitted A-7 in Sri Padma Nursing Home, Sindhanoor for delivery on 24-5-2004 and with a view to conceal the matrimonial link between them, A-1 mentioned the name of A-7 as Uma W/o Srinivas in Delivery Book and also in LSCS Operation Register, when A-7 got pregnancy second time; that after delivery A-1 shifted A-7 to Bellary; that A-1 developed his friendship with L.W.1; that since A-1 has got good access to move with LW.1, the other accused hatched up a plan to perform the marriage of A-1 with L.W.1; that they made all arrangements for the said purpose; that while L.W.1 was waiting for bus to go to college on 1-7-2005, A-1 asked her to board the car on the pretext of talking something; that A-1 introduced A-2 and A-3 to L.W.1 and informed her that they are going to Vykunthapuram, Tenali for marriage; that when L.W.1 refused to marry A-1, A-1 to A-3 put her under the fear of causing harm to her parents ie., L.Ws.2 and 3; that when they reached the temple, L.W.1 noticed the relatives of A-1 including A-4 and A-4; that A-4 and A-5 decorated her (L.W.1) as bride; that the remaining accused got performed the marriage of A-1 with LW.1; and that on the evening of 2-7-2005 all the accused and L.W.1 returned to Narasaraopet. The statement of L.W.14 shows that A-1 and A-7 with a view to conceal the matrimonial link between them, mentioned the name of A-7 as Uma w/o Srinivas in two registers while admitting A-7 in the hospital by A-1 and L.W.14 accompanied A-1 at the time of admission of A-7 in the hospital and when L.W.1 asked A-1 as to why he is doing like this, he stated that he is going to marry her uncle’s daughter and this fact is known to A-7 also. From a perusal of the charge sheet and the statement of L.W.14, prima facie, offences are made out against the petitioner. Therefore, it is not a fit case to scuttle the proceedings at the initial stage. The Criminal Petition No.7214/2007 is accordingly dismissed. Whereas Criminal Petition No.5708/2010 is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. ______________ A.GOPAL REDDY,J Dt.11-11-2010 kmr