IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2010 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 35931 of 2010(N) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- ALICE SUNNY, W/O. LATE A.V.SUNNY, AGED 60 YEARS, AINIKKAL HOUSE, OLLUR POST-680 306, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH SRI.V.C.MADHAVANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR-680 001. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, EDAKKUNNI VILLAGE, EDAKKUNNI-680 306, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R.), KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, KOKKALE, THRISSUR-680 021. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT PLEADER SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 35931 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 1st day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that she and her children are the owners of 0.2711 hectars of land in RS 52/3 of Edakkunni Village in Trichur District. According to the petitioner, for the reason that the Kerala Financial Corporation has attached the property, basic tax is not accepted by the 2nd respondent. It is with this grievance, the writ petition is filed. 2. In my view, even if it is a fact that there is an attachment in force, that does not stand in the way of the respondent in accepting tax so long as the property is that of the petitioner and is mutated in favour of the petitioner and her children. 3. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing that attachment, if any, by the KFC shall not be the reason for the 2nd respondent to decline to accept tax in respect of the property to which the petitioner and her children are the owners. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp