IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2011 / 1ST MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 30315 of 2004(H) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- AJAYAKUMAR, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.SANKARAN, MANAKODATH HOUSE, ELAMAKKARA P.O., ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-14, SUBSTITUTE CONTINGENT WORKER KOCHI CORPORATION. BY ADV. SMT.T.B.MINI RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. KOCHI CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BOAT JETTY, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT. NISHA BOSE R2 BY ADVS. SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN NAIR, SC, COCHIN CORP SRI.S.RAMESH BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs WP(C).No. 30315/2004(H) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF CERTIFICATE DATED 27/01/1989 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT STATING THE PETITIONER'S WORKING DAYS IN 1986 AND 1987. P2: COPY OF WAGE SLIP ISSUED TO THE PETITONER IN MAY 1997. P3: COPY OF ORDER DATED 29/03/2004 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. P4: COPY OF ORDER DATED 05/03/2004 IN WPC NO.21157/2003 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. P5: COPY OF THE ORDER OF REGULARISATION OF SERVICE OF EMPLOYEES ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 28/09/2004. P6: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE svs T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.30315/2004-H ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 21st day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed by a contingent worker working in the Cochin Corporation as substitute worker for permanent employees from 1986 onwards. The details of the engagement is evident from Ext.P1 Certificate. 2. The petitioner seeks for a direction to the first respondent to issue orders regularising the service of the petitioner and to fill up the vacancies of contingent workers from substitute workers on the basis of seniority. It is pointed out that in 1995, the Government issued an order making a provision for the same. The petitioner filed this writ petition after filing a detailed representation before the Government as per Ext.P6. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the Corporation and the learned Government Pleader. The learned Government Pleader submitted that the copy of Ext.P6 could not be traced out. Therefore, the petitioner will file a fresh representation in the matter along W.P.(C). No.30315/2004 -:2:- with a copy of the Judgment and the Writ Petition which will be submitted through proper channel, i.e., through the second respondent and the same will be considered by the Government and appropriate orders will be passed within a period of five months. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE