IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 7678 of 2010 Date of decision: 19.7.2011 Biru Ram … Petitioner versus Chandigarh Administration, UT, Chandigarh and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. K.S. Hissowal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit permanent injunction and declaration. His application under Order 39 rules 1 and 2, Code of Civil Procedure, for ad-interim injunction has been declined by the trial Court and the appeal so filed by him has also been dismissed by the lower appellate Court. Hence, this revision. Heard. There has been a consensus between the counsel for the parties that during the pendency of the suit, the parties shall maintain status- quo. In this back-drop, it is directed that during the pendency of the suit, the parties shall maintain status-quo. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. July 19, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE