IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6223 of 2009 SURENDRA PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 21.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is stated to be an employee of the Magahi Academy functioning under the Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar. The grievance of the petitioner is that subsequent to the grant of first time bound promotion, the revised salary in accordance therewith has been paid to him till August, 2006 and whereafter the salary is being paid to him on the old minus scale admissible after time bound promotion. He has filed a representation in that regard before the respondents in May and October 2008. If the petitioner has filed a representation as stated on his behalf, it is indeed unfortunate that orders from this Court under Article 226 are required for disposal of representation. Respondent no.1 is directed to ensure that the representation of the petitioner is considered by him and appropriate orders are passed by him on the claim of the petitioner and the legitimate dues of the petitioner are paid. Let the same be done within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)