IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28593 of 2010 LALAN YADAV @ LALO S/O LATE RAMKISHUN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.22684 of 2010 RAMESH YADAV S/O LATE DHYANI YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.30743 of 2010 JAWAHAR YADAV S/O LATE AKLU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.08.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 364,302,201,379,420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the informant initially recorded the loss of his tractor as well as his driver. He did not disclosed any names therein but subsequently filed the First Information Report, wherein he named Ramesh Yadav as having hired the tractor. Thereafter the tractor driver was found dead and during investigation, it transpired that there were three persons who were on tractor, each of whom were addressing as other Shakti, Lalan and 2 Ramesh. The accused persons were also arrested who confessed to have been involved in the present occurrence as also implicated the petitioner Jawahar Yadav. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Prayer for bail is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious nature of the offence. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )