In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Misc. No.M-12423 of 2009 ..... Date of decision:14.5.2009 Parkash Kaur and others .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab and another .....Respondents .... Present: Mr. Jitender Singh Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... S.S. Saron, J. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No.36 dated 20.3.2009 (Annexure-P.1) that has been registered for the offences under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC on the complaint of Veena Kumari alias Gursimran Kaur (respondent No.2). Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that petitioner No.1-Parkash Kaur is mother-in-law of the complainant. Petitioner No.2 is the husband's elder brother (Jeth) of the complaint and petitioner No.3 is the wife of the elder brother of the husband (Jethani) of respondent No.2-complainant. It is submitted that there are general allegations of harassment against Prakash Kaur-petitioner No.1. However, nothing has been mentioned as regards Davinder Singh and Ranjit Kaur (petitioners No.2 and 3) and their names have also been mentioned in the column of accused in the FIR which is attached as Annexure-P.1. During the course of hearing, it has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the matter is still under investigation Cr. Misc. No.M-12423 of 2009 [2] and the final report (challan) has not been filed so far. In the facts and circumstances, the present petition would be premature and the petitioner may in the first instance approach the investigating authorities setting out their grievances as have been made in the present petition. It is needless to submit that in case such an application is filed the same would be duly considered by the investigating authorities. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed at this stage being premature. May 14, 2009. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp*