IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14512 of 2010 1.RAMDEO SINGH, aged about 75 years, son of Late Prithvi Singh 2.RAJ NARAYAN SINGH, aged about 35 years 3.GAUTAM KUMAR SINGH @ SATYENDRA SINGH, aged about 24 years both sons of Sri Ramdeo Singh 4.SMT.INDU DEVI, aged 34 years, wife of Raj Narayan Singh All resident of Village & P.O. Karup, P.S.Karakat (Gorari), Distt. Rohtas ---Petitioners Versus 1.STATE OF BIHAR. 2.SMT. LAKHPATO DEVI, wife of Ramdeo Singh, resident of Village & P.O. Karup, P.S. Karakat (Gorari), Distt. Rohtas. ---Opp. Parties ----------- 2. 17.5.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The offence alleged against the petitioners, who are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case, is under sections 406, 420, 498A and 323 of the Penal Code. It is submitted that petitioner no.1 is the husband of the complainant-opposite party no.2, petitioners no.2 and 3 are sons and petitioner no.4 is the daughter-in-law of the complainant. It is submitted that the dispute arose on account of differences in execution of the alleged Panchanama, for which the matter has been brought by the complainant against these petitioners. As a matter of fact, all the parties have received due share as per the Panchanama. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let all these petitioners no.1 to 4 above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No.631 of 2009 2 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj (Rohtas), in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)