..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.315 OF 2008 Kalidas Dattatraya Salunkhe. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.Jaydeep D. Mane, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.H.J.Dedia, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 16th July, 2008. DATED : 16th July, 2008. DATED : 16th July, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. The learned Advocate for the applicant is relying on a decision in the case of In re In re In re Nandipamula Anjayya and others Nandipamula Anjayya and others Nandipamula Anjayya and others reported in 1970 1970 1970 CRI.L.J. 1681 (Vol.76, C.N. 445) CRI.L.J. 1681 (Vol.76, C.N. 445) CRI.L.J. 1681 (Vol.76, C.N. 445) in support of the fact that in the cross-examination of the complainant the facts, stated by the complainant in the inquest panchanama, could also be put to the complainant in the cross-examination by way of contradiction. It is seen that the said decision was not taken into consideration by the Sessions Court. In this view of the matter, the order dated 23.6.2008 is set-aside. The learned ..(2).. Sessions Judge shall consider the matter afresh and decide the same after taking into consideration the above decision. 3. Application is disposed of. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)