IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 17133 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: September 10, 2010. Sunil ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) Present: Mr. Rajbir Sehrawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh, A.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in FIR No.337 dated 25.11.2009, under Sections 395/397/412 IPC and 25of Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Sector 55, Faridabad. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as per the allegations he is only receiver of stolen property, which he purchased in good faith on consideration of `2,30,000/- and that he further sold the same and that hence allegation against him is for offence under Section 412 IPC only. Further contended that he has been continuing in CRM No.M-17133 of 2010 custody since 03.03.2010. Further contended that he is on bail in other cases pending against him. Further contended that trial is not likely to be concluded in near future as only two witnesses have been examined so far out of eight witnesses. Learned counsel for the State has not disputed these facts. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Sunil is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Faridabad. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) September 10, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2