1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6816 OF 2008 DIST.: KOLHAPUR Rau Vithu Patil & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus The Collector, Kolhapur, & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. A.B. Borkar for the Petitioners Mrs. M.P. Thakur, Assistant Government Pleader, for the Respondents. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and J.H. BHATIA , JJ. DATE: DECEMBER 12, 2008 P.C.:- The grievance of the petitioners is that they were entitled to rehabilitation under the Maharashtra Project affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986, as their land was acquired for the purpose of a project, and their case for rehabilitation is not being decided by the respondents. 2. It is submitted that counter-affidavit is filed, but we do not have it before us. But we have seen the copy of the counter provided by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, in which it is stated that 2 the petitioners have not completed the formalities, and have not given the requisite information along with their application, so that the respondents could decide whether they were entitled to rehabilitation or not. It is stated that the petitioners have not mentioned details in columns 3 to 10 and 12 & 13 of the proforma, which is a prescribed form. It is also stated that the petitioners were also summoned for a hearing and production of documents. 3. In this view of the matter, we dispose of the petition, directing the petitioners to submit all the requisite information called by the respondents. This information shall be furnished by the petitioners within a period of four weeks, and if the information is furnished within the period stipulated, the respondents shall decide the claim of the petitioners within 6 weeks thereafter. BILAL NAZKI, J. J.H. BHATIA, J.