IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2009 / 26TH SRAVANA 1931 LA.App..No. 697 of 2005() ---------------------------------- LAR.262/2002 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ALAPPUZHA .................... APPELLANT(S): 2ND RESPONDENT ----------------------- NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER (HR), KAYAMKULAM. BY ADV. MR.M.A.SHAFIK RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT & IST RESPONDENT ------------------------ 1. SRI.K.RAVEENDRAN, PUTHENPURACKAL, UPPUTHARA P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA, SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.A) NO. III, S.T.P.S. HARIPAD, (IST RESPONDENT IN THE L.A.R). R1 BY ADV. MR.K.R.B.KAIMAL R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.P.N.SUMANGALA THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= L.A.A. No. 697 of 2005 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this the 17th day of August, 2009 JUDGMENT PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, J. Even though the learned counsel appearing for the appellant has very strenuously argued before us, having gone through the impugned judgment, we are of the view that the enhancement granted by the learned Subordinate Judge in this case is satisfied on the legal evidence, which was available before us. We do not find any warrant for interference. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE. mn.