1 ABA 154-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.154 OF 2011 Chandrakant Dagdu Bharmal ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.S.K.Shinde, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.Y.M.Nakhawa, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 4TH MARCH, 2011 P.C. . This is an application for anticipatory bail by a person, who apprehends arrest in connection with C.R.No.I-696 of 2010 for the offence punishable under Sections 408, 409 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Sarkarwada Police Station. 2. The applicant was working as project officer and was alleged to have misappropriated a sum of Rs.26,40,000/- along 2 ABA 154-2011 with his other colleagues. Other colleagues had also filed an application for anticipatory bail. Those colleagues offered to deposit sums of Rs.4,00,000/- & Rs.1,00,000/- respectively. 3. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has not in fact misappropriated any amount. To show his bona fide applicant is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- in two instalments of Rs. 2,50,000/- each. The first instalment to be deposited within a period of two weeks and the second instalment to be deposited within a period of four weeks. In view of this presence of the applicant for the purpose of the investigation may not be necessary. In the event of arrest, applicant be released on bail on his furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.30,000/- on the following conditions. (i) The applicant shall report at the Sarkarwada Police Station for interrogation on 10 th March, 2011 in between 10.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. and thereafter, as and when required by 3 ABA 154-2011 the investigating officer. (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. 4. Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of. . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court dated 2 nd December, 2010 delivered in Special Leave Petition (Cri.) No.7615 of 2009 (Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State of Maharashtra And Ors.). (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)