IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 18636 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: August 2, 2010. Bhim Singh ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh, A.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Niranjan Singh, Advocate for the complainant. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in FIR No. 128 dated 14.05.2010, under Sections 148/149/323/324/ 506/307 IPC, registered at Police Station Kharkhoda, District Sonepat. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is 75 years old person and that injury attributed to him is only a simple injury with Danda to Karan Singh. It is further contended that he has been CRM No.M-18636 of 2010 continuing in custody since 27.05.2010 and that trial is not likely to be concluded in near future as even challan has not been filed so far. It is further contended that it is a case of version and cross-version and four persons from the side of petitioner have also received injuries. Learned counsel for the State has not disputed these facts. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Bhim Singh, is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Sonepat. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) August 2, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2