IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30934 of 2010 TINKU @ SAMSHAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.31374 of 2010 AFROJ Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/- 10.01.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners as well as learned P.P. for State. Both the above stated Criminal Miscellaneous cases have arisen out of Khajekala P.S. Case No. 228 of 2009 registered under Sections 302, 379 and 506/34 of the I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act, and accordingly, both the above stated Criminal Miscellaneous cases are being disposed of by this common order. Admittedly, petitioners are not named in the present case. They were arrested in Khajekala P.S. Case No. 03 of 2010 and one looted mobile of the present case was recovered from possession of the petitioner in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 31374 of 2010, when the aforesaid petitioner was interrogated, he disclosed that he had purchased the aforesaid mobile set from petitioner in Criminal Misc. Case No.30934 of 2010. Thereafter, the petitioner of Criminal Misc. Case No. 30934 of 2010 disclosed that he had purchased the aforesaid mobile set 2 from one Raj Kumar Chaudhary @ Raju Chaudhary and except the aforesaid material there is nothing against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as period of detention of the petitioners in judicial custody, above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Thakur Aman Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna City in connection with above stated Khajekala P.S. Case No. 228 of 2009. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner appearing in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 30934 of 2010 that due to typographical mistake the name of Presiding Officer has been left to be typed in prayer portion. Learned counsel for petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction within course of the day. Ashwini/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)