-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2185 OF 2009 Urjita Chitnis ... Petitioner versus Pravesh Niyantran Samiti and others ...Respondents Smt. Rajani Iyer, Senior Advocate, with Smt. Kirtida Chandarana and Shri Dhiraj Mhetre, instructed by Mahernosh Humranwala, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Behere with Ms. Priya Vaity, instructed by Shri Pankaj Das for respondent No.1. Mr. D.A. Nalawade, GP, for respondent No.2. Mr. S.C. Naidu with Mr. Afroz Shah, instructed by S.S. Pandey, for respondent No.3. Smt. R. Bhagatwala, with Shri M.D. Siodia, instructed by M/s. Rustamji & Ginwala, for respondent No.4. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & R.V. MORE, JJ. DATE: DECEMBER 08, 2009. P.C. Mr. Nalawade, learned Government Pleader, pointed out that it is not possible to accommodate the petitioner at this stage as, according to the circular of the University, 75 per cent of the attendance is a must. He submitted that, even otherwise, in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Mridul Dhar (minor) and another vs. Union of India and others [2005 (2) SCC -2- 65], it is not possible to give consent in this behalf. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after taking instructions from the petitioner, prays that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition. Permission granted. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Notice discharged. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. R.V. MORE, J.