C.R. No.6011 of 2009 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.6011 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 3.8.2010 Rana Partap Singh ……Petitioner VERSUS Smt. Kusum and others ……Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- Present: Mr. Aman Dhir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Rohilla, Advocate for Mr. Nonish Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.1. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. Present petition is filed challenging order dated 20.10.2007 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Karnal and order dated 30.3.2009 passed by Addl. District Judge, Karnal, thereby allowing the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. granting ad-in- terim injunction in favour of the plaintiffs/respondents restraining the C.R. No.6011 of 2009 (O&M) -2- defendant/petitioner not to dispossess the plaintiffs/respondents from the suit property and not to create third party interests during the pendency of the suit. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly states that any observation made in the impugned judgments are of prima- facie nature and shall not come into the way of the learned trial Court while deciding the suit on merit. 3. Both the Counsel state at bar that no unnecessary ad- journments shall be sought from the learned trial Court and both the parties shall request the learned trial Court to expedite the hearing of the suit. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. However, both the Counsel state that learned trial Court be directed to expedite the hearing of the suit. 5. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Hearing and disposal of the suit shall be expedited by the learned trial Court, if any such application is moved. No unnecessary adjournment shall be granted. ( ALOK SINGH ) 03rd August, 2010 JUDGE ashish