.^^^^-f^ .^ •^ ^•n^ ^•^ . c^ •^ L BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.lZt3/2004' Gangadhar Sinha S/o:Fagua Ram Sinha Aged about 39 years : R/o:Abhanpur Basti Tah: Abhanpur, Dist: Raipur (C.G.) PETITIONER Versus 1) Secretary General .Administration Deptt. Govt. of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur. (CG) 2) Secretary Chhattisgarh Lokayog, Mahadevghat Road Raipur (C.G.) 3) Superintendent of PoUce, State Economical Offence Investigation Bureau, Near: Jaijawan Petrol Pump, Raipur (CG) 4) Madhav Prasad Sahu, S/o : Not known Working as : Peon, Chhattisgarh Lokayog, Raipur (CG) 5) RakeshKushuva, S/o : Not known Worlcing as: Peon Chhattisgarh Lokayog, Raipur (CG) 6) Venkatesh Sahu 8/0:Not known Working as: Peon Chhattisgarh Lokayog, Raipur (CG) ^&'5SS" .-^^^...•v' '* y.^ 9<er ^0' " .. ^}^ ^^ ^ i^ p^'. h-' 's> Ajay Kumar Shrivastav S/o : Not known Working as: Peon Chhattisgarh Lokayog, Ralpur (CG) 8) RajMadi Kushuva, S/o : Not known Working as: Peon Chhattisgarh Lokayog, Raipur (CG) Respondentt Q WRIT PBTITION UNDBR AMTICLB »/ 227W OF THB CONSTITUTION OP INDIA POR GRANT OF MANDAMUS, CBRTIORAAI OR DIRBCTION OF LIKLB NATURE. r" XI-HC-22 'STT^T'^T [<^J<=h 3Tli?T 5h^ii<=h ^f^a lu^l ^ /v /' €^ ^"^ ^ww^, w^tWTS, f®(<ni<4^< 3ni^r xT^ra? __.^?..:.t..!<lo..>...l.'L:.llS. ^W^[t ^^p—.........——....—.^^ ^^ 'f^ST' 3^?T ^<n^R ^lf^T 10.05.2004 Sliil R.N. Vyas, counsel Ibr Shri Saojay S. Agrawal, Kespondeut 110, lou advauce cop] Heard. It is aubraittcd tih.at pursu^ 24.7.2002, tlie petitioner 28.10.2003 (Anncxurcs P-11 &| decided till date. Leaiiied counst for fhe present fhe petitioner the detailecl reprcsentation of tlie respondents, which shaU accordance wifh law, >U^ll1 ?uAnt to thc tci'siniisition ordcr dated submit^ed representations 24.8.2002 and P-12) 5 biit fhcy havc not bccn ;1 for th.e petitioner submits ftiat be given aa opportunity of filing afre^li before the competent authority ifce considered on ite OWB. xsierite in insi^ op^ruon respt>ndeuts Haviiig cousidercd aad wi fhc xnciite of thc casc, m. thc wiU be sei-ved it' a dii'ection is detailed representation afresh competent aufhority of flie petition aiid tliis order, witliia II beiag filed, tlie competeiit auUioi{ity the ^ame on ite own inerits ia| possible preferably withia two the representatk)n. It is laade | remains, tlie petitloner may avail) ttie With thc aforc^aid obsl disposed of. C.C* as per n.des* ct)l^(crt4)rl "HPT^f ^ fe^ <P»i^i< ^ 3Tf^P:T3?T^T fhe petitioner. Paael Lawyer for the State/ Ifhout expressmg aay opmiou on ofthis Coiirt, cnds ofjusticc ^iven to the petitioner to make a j^ising his grievances before the atong wifh. a copy 6f Uie days, aadon such representetion ijity ofthe respondents shall decide ac^ordanc^ witli law as early as i^ioiittis froiR fhe date of receipt of clear that if aiiy grievan.ee still remedy under ftie law, rvation^, fhi^ petition sstand^ Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge w^f^