IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8761 of 2011 Date of Decision : 11.10.2011. Vinod Kumar ……Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …..Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. R. K Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G with Mr. J. K. Verma, Dy. A. G. for respondents –State. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner is aggrieved by his transfer from Vigilance Wing, Mandi to Traffic Wing (Tourism) Shimla. According to the petitioner, the transfer is apparently made on account of his posting in the home district. However, in the case of the petitioner, his home district is not Mandi, but Kangra and, therefore, he should not have been disturbed from Mandi. That apart, it is submitted that his child is 60% disabled and it is also pointed out that he has only 14 months left to retire from service. All these aspects, the petitioner may point out before the second respondent, in which case the second respondent will look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law and justice. Orders, as above, shall be passed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of an appropriate representation along with a copy of the writ petition and a 2 copy of this judgment by the petitioner before the second respondent. In case the petitioner is relieved in the meanwhile, he shall not be compelled to join the transferred station and it will be open to him to avail leave of the kind due. 2. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Authenticated copy to the petitioner. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. October 11, 2011 (rana/pankaj)