1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.2958/1995. : : Chetram Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : : Date of Order 11.8.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTI CE MOHAMMAD RAFI Q Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta for the petitioner. This writ petition was filed by the petitioner in the year 1995 on the ground that even though he was much senior to respondent No.4 Prabhu Lal, but he was not promoted on the post of LDC whereas respondent No.4 was so promoted on the post of LDC by order dated 27.2.1980 w.e.f. 9.2.1980. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in position to inform whether the petitioner has been at any point of time subsequent to filing the writ petition was promoted or not ? Having regard to the facts of the case, I find that writ petition was filed with delay of 15 years, direction at this stage cannot be issued for promoting petitioner w.e.f. 9.2.1980, but at the same time if the petitioner on his 2 seniority is entitled to consideration, the respondents should consider his case for promotion. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to make fresh representation to District Collector, Sawai Madhopur, who shall examine the matter and if satisfied that petitioner is senior to respondent No.4, consider his case for promotion. If eventually the petitioner is promoted, he shall be entitled to original seniority on the post of LDC based on seniority of the post of Class-IV employees, on which seniority, the respondent No.4 was promoted. (MOHAMMAD RAFI Q)J. A.Arora/ - Item No.H/ 7.