9.wp-3607-11.doc jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3607 OF 2011 Shri. Balaram Govind Gaikwad ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Kiran Joshi for Petitioner Mr. Sameer Patil AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 CORAM : S.A.BOBDE AND SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J J. DATE : NOVEMBER 21, 2011. P.C.: 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. 2. The only prayer made by the petitioner is for directing the respondents to sub-divide the property and fix boundaries of the land in question. Shri. Sameer Patil, the learned AGP states that the petitioner has not produced certain documents such as N.A. order from Respondent No.3. Shri. Patil states that Respondent No.3 will issue notice to the petitioner calling upon him to produce necessary documents including the above and after receiving said documents, will take a decision regarding the sub-division 1 9.wp-3607-11.doc of the property and fix boundaries of the land. The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that he will submit the necessary documents as detailed in the notice. The Respondent No.3 shall decide the matter as expeditiously as possible, however within a period of three months after receiving all the documents. 3. Rule is made absolute in the above terms. [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ S.A.BOBDE, J. ] 2