§@ Lav IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITIONS N0530 2010 QLE IE€§§§§ IME / PETITIONER: Naresh Ram Yadav, son of Shri KhageshwarRam Yadav, aged about 53 years, working as Upper Division‘ Teacher, Govt. Middle School Pandripani, Tahsil Kunkuri District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. w m3...... b‘” Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Commissioner, Lok Shikshan, Sanchanalaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. . DistrictEducation Officer, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Collector, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 5. Block Education Officer, Block Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. a». WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA . H *9 XI-HC—78 WW . wQLQMx’y‘ (p 200 mm (We) mmm INK‘i’R DAVAKER mmm ammm mmawm“ mmm $3 : HGK’BLE EIK. JUSTECE .pRW 15 $Q 2&1 G Shri OJ‘KRao. counsel ’0 l Sm Ajit Sing?” 9L. fox: km < Counsel for the Detiticner Enquiry has alread r’ ham} initiater wouid 1 ORéf ES with a direction to the authori proceedings as early as possibie State Counsei has rio obiec initiated against the netitiorter is cc En View of aoova the 3e s are directed, i0 ae netitioner azxd comoik ‘ ‘” WE ma the den draw ibis b 1 to C0:::p%ete the he petitioner‘ >tai€ . su bmits EEC fiiXQS . . O h e concam ed ties ‘tion if me cienartmentai enouirl mniexed ex edit‘ousiv is ciisméssed as Wéthcirawm , t' segne as exoedétiouslv as 1e :he Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge ‘ J Shri C.J.K,Rao. counsel fort Shari Am Singh; 9L. foé ting s Counsei fer the oatitioner enquiry has almady baan initiater wouid be served. if ths petitions? is with a difaction to the author} proceedings as eariy as possibb Stata Counsei has rio ob‘%ec initiamd against the petitioner is cc En View of above. the petitio State authorities are directed to e against the petitioner and oompk possibkj. V he Detitioner. ,tate. submits that the departmenta} against him and ends of iustice permitted to Withdraw this Detitiom ties concerned to comptete the ation if the departmenta1 enquiry mpieted expeditiousty. r: is dism§ssed as withdrawn Th: xpedite the departmentai enquiry te the same as expedttiously as Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge amt w fawiaa‘ ammm 311%?!m (Wu) m Em 311%?! W?W WW a; aimm 7» SB : gON’ELE MR. JUSTECE ?Ri’£ INKER DEWAKER 16.99.2010 WW WW w QLQéVag-s‘ WW m im- (Wu) mmm mm f§aW r <iwai§maa1é§1 { SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRI'I 16.99.2010 Shri C.J.K.Rao, counsel fort Shm' Ajit Singh, P.L. for the E Counsel for the petitioner enquiry has already been initiatec. would be served if the petitioner is wxth a dn‘ectlon to the author-1 proceedmgs as early as poss1ble State counsel has no objek initiated against the petitioner is cci in mew of above, the pet1t1o “ltate authorities me dlreoted to e agamst the pet1tloner and eomple possible . INKER DIWAKER he petitioner. ttate. submits that the departmentai against him and ends of justice permitted to Withdraw this petition ties concerned to complete the ftion if the departmental enquir mpteted expeditiously. n is dismissed as withdrawn. The xpedite the departmental enquiry te the same as expeditiously as >Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge y