IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 630 of 2010 Charan Singh S/O Sri Vikram Singh, R/O Goverdhanpur, Tehsil Laksar, District Haridwar. … Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary, Sugarcane and Sugar Secretariat Complex Dehradun. 2. Commissioner, Sugarcane and Sugar Uttarakhand, Kashipur. 3. Secretary, Cooperative Societies Uttarakhand Sashan Secretariat Complex Dehradun. 4. Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Laksar through its Special Secretary. 5. Ravindra Nagar, S/O Bhagat Singh, R/O Chandra Chari Chowk, Ranipur Mode, Haridwar, District Haridwar. … Respondents. Mr. Anil Dabral, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. J.P.Joshi, learned Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 3. Mr.Gopal Narain, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent No.4. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent No.5. Date April 29, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Interim Relief Application No. 3085 of 2010) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order impugned dated 27-4-2010 (Annexure-3 to the petition) passed by respondent no.1, whereby the membership of the petitioner has been cancelled with immediate effect. According to the petitioner, the petitioner was nominated as member of the Cooperative Cane Development Society Laksar by respondent no.1- State of Uttarakhand on 2-3- 2009 in exercise of the power under Section 34 (1) of the Uttaranchal Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 (for short the Act). According to the petitioner, the period of the committee of management is two years. The period is yet to expire. 2 Mr. J.P.Joshi, learned Chief Standing Counsel, appearing for the State drew the attention of this Court to the provisions of sub-section (2) of Section 34 of the Act, which is quoted below:- “(2) A person nominated under sub-section (1) shall hold office during the pleasure of the State Government.” Thus, it is obvious that a member, who was nominated in the committee of management of society would hold his office during the pleasure of the State Government. Form a perusal of sub-section (2) of Section 34 of the Act, it reveals that there is neither any provision to give opportunity of hearing before termination of such membership nor the Member so nominated by the State Government has a statutory right to continue till the period of committee of management expires. In view of the provisions of sub-section (2) of Section 34 of the Act, the petitioner has no vested right to continue upto two years from the date on which he was nominated as Member. For the reasons above, the writ petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed outright at the threshold. The writ petition is dismissed summarily. All pending applications stand disposed of. ( B.S.Verma, J.) RCP 3