CD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) If WRIT_P ETITIpN N0. ^°A^l . /2003 PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^^" 7- •^* €?^ /T^"" ^. / ^ R^endra Prasad Giri %ged aboufc 49 years S/0 Shri Parshuram Giri Occupation Driver R/0 c-2, Raja Talab Ra ipar { Chha tt isga rh) Union of India Through Secrefcary MAnistry of Personnel & Training, New Delhi Sfcafce of Madhya PradeSi^ Through Director Sainik Kalyan, Madhya Pradesh Guru TegbaBfadur Complex New Market T.T^ Nagar Bhopal (M.P.) Stafce of Chhattisgarh Dlrectorafce Sainik Kalyan chhattisgarh Ka chaha ri, Campus , Ra ipur (C.G.) The Secretary Sfcate Reorganisation Cell (Advisoty Comrriifctee BHopal) Bhopal (M.P.) 2.. @ u State of chfaafctisgarh Through Chief Secretary ManfcralayQ , Ratpar ( C»G<) Jila Sainik Kalyan Karyal^ya B il a spur ( Chha tt isga rh) ^RIl\J)STITl?N_U^pER_ARTICLE_22_67227AoF_THE_CD^STI^^ OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURES OF MANDAMUS CtJRTIO RARI AND/OR O RDER ( S ) AND/OR_DI RECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF WRITS i XI-HC-78 \dT^'-<4iqio)«,UTTlwKc, RlrtW^ _,__ LO,^ ^LG ^-<L/ _ ___^ TR^T^m^ •••••••--••'•••••-TT"TT7-^— ^20a!l ^91 q^cp (^^HS) 31T^^TcCTl^Flt<^ ^^TOn^^T^HF^ ^^^. gT^IT^R^rfl?[ W^^T l «.FS-^finP On Q mention mad^, ^p, Rahul Mishra, couns^ Mr. .S.K< B^rJwa!, respondent No.l. Mr-. ».K. Beriwai, De^u1 regpondents No.3, 5 & 6, None appears on behalf Heard, Thc petitioner who is of the State ^ovt, of Chhat under Articw 226/227 c>f the The of rhe St^ta Sara^e of Chhattis^4Mh joincd his i^l State of MQahya PrQaesh, A^te of the State of Chhatti^garh in the ChhattJsgarh Sarlior e^uty Advocate fienerai for the State/ bf respondents No,2 a 4. p€TiTic|n€r 1}1 75-3950-80-4950/- and on r-^ore gave option for the State aljocated to thg otate of AAac|iyG vid^ ord^r dat^d 30th Septa.mbl^r, <pi<ifo<i1Ti/ii^^T^?(^^cl ^Rii^-ci^ ^3lf^T3n^ST :, the is taken up for* hearing, ^l for the petitloner. Pan^J Counsel for Union of India/ ^orRina as driver in the Home Department s|Ttj^garh haspreferrcd thi^ wrlt petltlon .onstitution of India. i3 that he is working as Oriver sn The 4Mh under th^ Mome bcpartiTient. The fne Soinik Koivan Board in the bifurcatlon of the State and formation th^ ^ervlccs of the petitioner have ^Tate GamQe on the pay scaie of fts.3050- rafcoraani^atfon of the State the uetttioner |of Chhattisgarh, however, he has Pradesh and ordered to join at Swaiior \ 2002. ——-~ A-fiter XI-HC-78 TPT^T^TT^ sdvq -^WW^, U^Wfo, RrtWy<< ..^^^.O.^r/ 3T?^^TcpTf^TTcp ?faiT3T[^?Ta!qtEp •^Y^ ^' ^Ft200rS 3TT^?T q5ra? (ltclij61<<S) ?'^T^R^rfl?T3TI^^T peti't'oner has opted for the <^l<4lo<n^ HFCTf ^fFs^SI \Fjt^-CK ^3:rf^T3TT^^T Learned counse! for th4 p^titioner submit^ that even thouah the State of Chhattisgsrh, but he hos aiiocated to the State of Mad|iya Pradesh., therefore, the petitloner may b.e ailowad to make a r^Dra.^anl'ation for r^-consideration of albcation of his services to The State of ChhaTTisgarh To which Jearned counsel appearin-9 for re^pondents N0.^ Having heard .ieamed cojn^e! for the parties'Qnd having regard to The facts and clrcumsTances No,2 with It^ eomment^ with?n ^ 3, 5^ A. 6 have no objectbn. bf the case, the petitioner is ailowed- to rnate a repr^sentation to r^sp^ndent No,3 withln 15 days from today, In tum, No.3 the to three rnonfh^ from the of r^eeipt of the sam^, In turn, r^spo'ndetit No-2 sha!! forward me sam^ wlthin another 3 months thereof to| respondent NoJ/Union of India with its comm^nt^, and re^pond^nt N^,1 ghall decide tha repr^entatbn within 3 rnonths thereof on i1js- own rnerits, in with !aw, With the direction afor€|said,.thepetltion stands of< Consequently, M.(W.)P.| also stand disposed Partie^ a?"!e cintjtied for'^ei^tjfjed copy of this orde,ya. Mo.1833/2003, I.A.Nos.6096/2003 snd ot. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge