Learned counsei for the $ta sbmits th et the peitioner ak a repsentation before he responde and the sae woutd be decided in accordnce with law. The petition is disposed of th the aforesaid direction. in the ventuality of filing any sh repr ntatien by the etitione teetere the respondents raising aii is grievanc it is expect fm the respondents te deide the same considering ai the ctua nd legai aspect o the case s exey e it is made clear that his C t has not expressed any opinion on rits of the case and the authority ncerned would he at iiberty to decide the appiicatien strictiy in accordance th law. i ‘ Sdl- Ptinker Diwaket e uc e e pr h e ed ro c l al a f a pditiousl as possibi. t o r me o te u at t t me. re t n s m a wi l ri ‘XI-HC~78 3a W, mug, W3: WWW99Nét%/gal;im mm (Wu) \ F mwfzm' Wmm I m F mam ’ \ W»‘ a? m‘év’ aim mfg?W ‘S.B‘: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PR3Tl KER D!WAKER 1 K 27-03-2010: ‘ ' Shri Roop ’Naik, counsel for theL pefétioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, PL fs’ the StatelresporxdentS. Shxi Naik, counsel for the p iitieher submits mat ends of just§ce woutd be served if the petitiokn is emitted to fife ffesh representation before the respondents raising ail his grievances which have been raised in the present petition and in turn the r spondents may he directed to decide the said representation expeditiousty n accordance with iew.