IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal I Bail Application No.332 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Kamal Sanga ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party ________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime/FIR No.2 of 2010, U/s 302/201/34 IPC, P.S. Tallital Nainital, Distt. Nainital Dated: March 22, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Vivek Shukla, Adv. for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. G.A. for the State as well as Mr. B.D. Pandey, Adv. for the complainant. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is not named in the FIR and the case rests upon the circumstantial evidence and there is no evidence against him to connect him with the aforesaid crime and the chain of the circumstances is also not complete. Further, co-accused Santosh Kumar Bisht has been released on bail by this Court on 16.2.2010 while co- accused Devendra Singh Rawat @ Bhola @ Sameer has been granted bail by this Court on 10.3.2010 and the present applicant also deserves bail on the basis of parity. After considering all the facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Kamal Sanga be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nainital. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 22.03.2010 Rajeev Dang