1 CP-47-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 47 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3004 OF 2010 Siddharam Shivappa Patil ... Petitioner vs. The Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Ramdas Sabban, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sachin Shetye, Special Counsel a/w Ms. Geeta Mulekar and Shri Ajay Basutkar,Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1, 6, 7 and 8 - UOI . Shri A.I.I.Patel, AGP, for respondent Nos. 2 to 5. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 4th August, 2011. P.C. 1. Learned Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 6, 7 and 8 and the learned AGP appearing for respondent Nos. 2 to 5 make a statement that now the proposal has been made by All India Radio for the purpose of acquisition of land and that proposal is received by the State Government on 3.8.2011. The learned Counsel inform that to complete the process of acquisition, passing of award and payment of compensation it would take about six months. In view of this statement, the learned Counsel for the petitioner does not want to prosecute the Contempt Petition with liberty to file fresh Contempt Petition in case the process is not completed and payment is not made before expiry of six months from this day. 2 CP-47-11.sxw 2. In view of the above, Contempt Petition stands disposed of as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)