IN_THE_HIGH_ C©URT OF JUDIGATmE t 'y' ."'.•:.'.•'.': . - .•' • .' - AT - MLASPUR • l W.P.JIQ. ] v>^\ • • /•S.OQQ BETTOEN PETITIGNffi RBSP€NDB>}TS DINESH KUMAR BELCHANDW -A@E - LjO YEARS S®N ©FSHRI H.L.BELCHANBAN AS —LECTORER" .AT-.GOVT .^ GIRt/'S HIGHER SEeGNBARY SCH00L, BHILAI-3 BISTBieT—.EEJR@(C.e.) R/©-H-2/48.'rTH'BUIt'DING B@RS (CHHATTISGARH) VERS0S.. . . . • s1. STATE ©F©HHATTISSiWH •-,£-TNROUSH TME SECRETARY . MINISTRY ©FSCTiOGL EDUCATICN . D.K.BHAWW, RAIPm : 2» BISTRICT EB0CATION ©FFICER , DUR.G (CHHATTISQ^H ) 3» THE PRINGIPAL, GOVT. GIRt'S HI6HER SEGGNBABY ...SGHGtX., BHILAI-3 DIST.—DmS 4» M.P.STATE AmTNISTRATIVE TRIByNAL, BENCH AT- RAIPUR THR©U8H THE'RB3iSTBAR . PETITICTI UNDER ARTICLE 227_O^THE CeNSTITOTION OF INDIA. - - ^^,,fr,f,frt:.|.--M ^?-*.-^ - '<CT"HC-22 sn^i^T 'R-fi*;3D^r' ^fli^ y^ti 'Svl "s|i<iiciq, aTil+i'Kc, facii'yy 1 ttlNttT^fiWS ^E..^B&....1.3 000 ;'STI^T.^k]!^ ?^T, 15/2/2001. . '^: - Sbri R;S .' ;.Patel,,, lea Shr.i. Gautan Bhsdhari Heard. The petjitloner bej.ng| P/l) requlring the Prlnci.j <;hi-4i(n:41i ^RTR^tt' "^ fe^t <^t<-^i< ^ aiiigii an^r salary of the aFpllcant f|roin one psrticulsr scbool, fl.led tb®petitioa befere the s| Tbe Tribunal after hearinE wes no allegatlon of the pai.d to bim and therefore Leanaed counsel for Annexure P/8 in alaiost a s| p:ned counsel for the petitioner. t 1ea.tn ed PLfor state. aggrleved by tbe order (Annexure al of the sebool to draw the .ate Adninlstrative Tribunal. the parties found tbat there letition^ir that salary was not [ismissed the petition. .he/petj-tioner submits that In niilar petitj.on the Tribunal has interfered, therefore,, th^re wa-s no reason for the Tribunal to dismlss the petition. We have gone throug^ ia this said petit.ion was of the salary from anothej step in aid to declare th| present case there are no dispute befere us tbat the[ regularly. 1<- ./tfae said erder. Ihe argyaent | hat the erder 6f drawingA'ithdraKftlj scbooi was aotivated and was a/ ssid peti-tiont/assurplus. In t]ie! iliegations as such. It is not in petitioner 1s ge-tting his salary .•. Ni!^3t I 3-H^I laqi ( y,qt^St<^ET ) 311^1 ^iT W* sn^i ?h^i=ti ^ilia SII^T'S^aiwai??! After hearing parties, we are 1s maKing out a ca^ Court xuider Artid4 y CM<4i<vt41T1 TTFRTf ^ I^Sf <r3f^f< ^7 sifigiT gii^r Ithe leamed counsel for the uri^ble -fco hold that the petitioner |e for interference by tfee Higb 227 of •tbe Cens-fcitution 1s ddsiaissed. Tlae pet3?tloi^ Sd/- R.S. Sharma Judge Sd/- Chief Justice RPRJ—FS/311—i/2()01—50.000