IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 4840 of 2008 Decided on: 10.09.2010 B.C. Bilyan …Petitioner Versus The Secretary (Animal Husbandry) to the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner. : None. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Naresh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 has drawn the attention of this Court to office order dated 5th April, 2000. A bare perusal of the same reveals that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and he has been promoted to the post of Senior Manager (Plant). Mr. Naresh Thakur further submits that the necessary monetary benefits have already been paid to the petitioner as per Annexure R-1/D, dated 12.09.2000. 2. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the present petition stands disposed of since the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. However, in case the petitioner is 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- still aggrieved, he can make a representation to the competent authority for the redressal of his grievance. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge September 10, 2010 (K. Attri)