IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2819 of 2010 AZMAT ALI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 02.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though he has been alleged for causing cruelty for demand of dowry but earlier to the complaint petition, matrimonial case for restitution of conjugal rights was filed by this petitioner as complainant had left the matrimonial house for herself created differences in which also there was some reconciliation and she agreed to live peacefully with this petitioner. Taking that into consideration, the matrimonial case ended. Now, for the same cause of her own, complainant is not ready to live with this petitioner and to make pressure for some unreasonable gain continued with the complainant with false allegation of demand and cruelty for its non- fulfillment, this case is lodged. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Trial No. 2742 of 2009 arising out of Complaint case No. 896 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M., Ist Class, 2 Bettiah, West Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)