1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2210 OF 2004 IN APPEAL LODGING NO.421 OF 2004 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1624 OF 2002 IN SUIT NO.3573 OF 2001 Seema Ramnarayan Agarwal .. Appellant. V/s. Udailal V. Jain & Another .. Respondents. Mr.R.S. Deshpande i/b. A.R. Patil for the appellant. Mr.Sanjay Jain i/b. Lalit Jain for the respondents. CORAM : R.M. LODHA, & CORAM : R.M. LODHA, & CORAM : R.M. LODHA, & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2004. DATED : 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2004. DATED : 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2004. P.C. : Heard. 2. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the notice of motion, we are satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause in filing the appeal in time. 3. The delay in filing the appeal is 2 condoned. 4. Office to process the appeal and post it for admission as soon as numbered. 5. The notice of motion stands disposed of. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.M. LODHA, J.) (R.M. LODHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)