IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.779 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision: 04.05.2011 Jarnail Singh and others …..Appellants versus Financial Commissioner, Haryana and others ……Respondents CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for the appellant Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) Paragraph No.11 of the grounds of appeal reads thus:- “That the Hon’ble Single Judge has not taken into consideration that the grounds which has been mentioned in the writ petition as well as did not go through the judgments passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as well as by this Hon’ble Court which has been specifically mentioned as well as presented before the Hon’ble Judge at the time of arguments and passed the judgment dated 7.4.2011 on the same term as the orders have been passed by the Ld. Commissioner as well as by the Ld. Financial Commissioner. The order dated 7.4.2011 is impugned in the present appeal.” Furthermore, in the list of events attached with this appeal, it is stated as under:- LPA No.779 of 2011(O&M) “No comments have been given with regard to merits of the case and nothing has been discussed in the order dated 17.1.2011 (Annexure P-7) even the arguments which has been raised by the present appellants have not been dealt with. This Hon’ble Court has also over sight the judgment which have been mentioned in the writ petition itself.” Before us also, it has been stated that the arguments raised by counsel for the appellants and the law cited, were not considered by the learned Single Judge. If that is so, we permit the appellants to file an application before the learned Single Judge, claiming the requisite relief. They may file an appeal thereafter, if need be. Disposed of. (Jasbir Singh) Judge 04.05.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) gk Judge 2