IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19584 of 2011 Sarswati Devi & Anr Versus Asarfi Ram & Ors ----------- 02. 14.11.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners have filed this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 08.04.2011 passed by Munsif III, Saran, Chapra in Title Suit No.19 of 2001 whereby the learned Court below set aside the Pleader Commissioner’s report. Admittedly, the plaintiffs filed the aforesaid suit for removal of encroachment. Pleader Commissioner was appointed and the Pleader Commissioner submitted his report. The petitioners filed application for confirming the report whereas the defendant-respondent filed objection to the said report. After hearing the parties, it appears that the learned Court below found various defects in the report of Pleader Commissioner. In the impugned order, the learned Court below has categorized the defects and then finding the report as unsatisfactory set aside the same. In such view of the matter, the deficiency of the reasoning or the defects pointed out by the Court below cannot be examined by this Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 2 I, therefore, find no jurisdictional error and, therefore, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)