IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERAAD TUESDAY, the 7th day of June, 2011 Present: Hon’ble Sri Justice N. Ravi Shankar Crl.P.No. 4146 of 2011 Between: Jetharam Prajapat and others …Petitioners and The State of AP and another THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRL.P.No. 4146 of 2011 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri K. Jyothi Prasad and also the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The de facto complainant is stated to be the son of the fourth petitioner and there is a property dispute between them regarding a building situated at Vijayawada. It is stated that both the de facto complainant and his father entered into a compromise before the Lok Adalat at Vijayawada and a compromise decree was passed on 5-10-2010 in a suit between them, where under the de facto complainant took Rs.7.50 Lakhs from his father and gave up his claim over the building in question. The present Crime No.275 of 2011 relates to the offence pertaining to this building. However, a perusal of the record would show that there is no ground to quash the investigation. In the circumstances this petition in so far as that relief is concerned is dismissed at the admission stage. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, however, says that arrest of the petitioners may be stayed in view of the compromise decree between the de facto complainant and his father. In the circumstances the police can take a decision about arrest of the petitioners after completion of the investigation, especially in view of the fact that the de facto complainant and his father compromised the matter and as that property is said to have been purchased by petitioner No.1. _____________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J. June 7, 2011. *BVS