1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12023 of 2011 SANJEEVIKUMAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THUVAKUDI POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. CR.NO.249 OF 2011. For Petitioner : M/S. M.RAJARAJAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Addl. Public Prosecutor( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 324 and 506(i) IPC in Crime No.249 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the alleged occurrence took place on 04.09.2011 and a complaint given on 05.09.2011 and the injured discharged from the hospital. He further submits that a false case has been foisted against the petitioner and the petitioner also filed a counter case and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail. 3. Refuting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the alleged occurrence took place on 04.09.2011 and the case has been registered on 05.09.2011 undder Sections 324 and 506(i) IPC. He fairly conceded that the injured also discharged from the hospital and the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, it is seen that the alleged occurrence is said to have been taken place on 04.09.2011 there is a wordy quarrel between the two parties in that on the basis of complaint given by the petitioner the case was filed in Crime No.284 of 2011 under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(2) IPC. On the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 basis of Complaint given by the de-facto complainant one Dhandapani, the present case has been registered on 05.09.2011, after preferring the complaint by the de-facto complainant. Furthermore, the injured has been discharged from the hospital. Since it is a case in counter even though the case has been registered on 05.09.2011, the petitioner was not arrested he neither interferred with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am incined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certaion conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance befoer the learned Judicial Magistrate VI, Tiruchirappalli, and on his exectuing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate VI, Tiruchirappalli, and on fruther condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magsitrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which,anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 15/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI,TIRUCHIRAPPALLI. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TIRUCHIRAPPALLI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,THUVAKUDI POLICE STATION,TRICHY DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/S. M.RAJARAJAN Advocate SR.No.31726 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12023 of 2011 Date :15/09/2011 PA/19.09.2011/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/