IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6361 of 2005 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI ============================================================== ============================================================== RAKESHBHAI AMRUTLAL BHARDA - Petitioner(s) Versus COLLECTOR,JUNAGADH DIST. &4 - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : MR JASWANT K SHAH for Petitioner No(s).: 1. MR PR ABICHANDANI, AGP for Respondent No(s).: 1. MR MEHUL S SHAH for Respondent No(s).: 2,3. MR SURESH M SHAH for Respondent No(s).: 2,3. RULE SERVED for Respondent No(s).: 4. ============================================================== CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI Date : 14/06/2005 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 of any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ORAL JUDGMENT Mr.Mithani, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner points out that pursuant to the order dated 8-4-2005 passed by this Court, Collector-Junagadh has by an order dated 4-5-2005 disposed of the proceedings of Case No.36/2003. He submits that this was the main prayer of the petitioner in the present petition and since the Collector has already disposed of the proceedings, nothing further would survive in the present petition. He submits that the order passed by the Collector on 4-5-2005 is adverse to the petitioner, which the petitioner would challenge in accordance with law. In view of above development, I see no further reason to maintain the present petition and the same is disposed of having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. (AKIL KURESHI, J.) /malek