IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2008 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 30959 of 2008(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- K.V.NARAYANAN, AGED 58 YEARS S/O.VELAYUDHAN, KANDIRITHY HOUSE PERAMANGALAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT ( DRIVER RTD.KSRTC. DEPOT, THRISSUR.) BY ADV. SRI.ANANDARAJAN.N RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT PO., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23. 2. FINANCIAL ADVISOR AND CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, KSRTC, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT PO., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23. 3. ASSISTANT PERSONNEL OFFICER(PENSION) KSRTC, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23. 4. DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER KSRTC, THRISSUR. ADV. SHRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN, SC, KSRTC FOR R1 TO 4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).No.30959/2008 2 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: PENSIONER'S PASS NO.47054 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE ATTENDANCE STATEMENT OF THE PETITIONER DURING THE PROVISIONAL PERIOD. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.PL5.8466/81/TCR DTD.25.11.1981 REAPPOINTING THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 2.04.2008 IN W.P(C) No.11257/08. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE ORDER NO.LR8-023330/97 DATED 27.1.2007. EXT.P7: COPY OF THE LAST REPRESENTATION DT.16.07.2008 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE S.SIRI JAGAN, J ================== W.P(C)No. 30959 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 9th day of December, 2008. J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the K.S.R.T.C. submits that K.S.R.T.C. has passed a revised order of pension reckoning petitioner's provisional service also, which is the prayer made in the writ petition. The learned standing counsel for the Corporation hands over a copy of the revised pension payment order to the counsel for the petitioner. In the above circumstances, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge that order if he is still aggrieved, the writ petition is closed. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs