IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 1273 of 2010 Date of Decision: 27.1.2010. Rakesh Yadav and others --Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioners. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.S. Kundu, Addl. A. G., Haryana has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents-State. The petitioners were engaged as Guest Faculty in various disciplines in response to the advertisement dated 20.8.2009 published in 'Dainik Bhaskar' (Annexure P-1). Their appointment was on remuneration of Rs. 250/- per hour subject to maximum of Rs. 10,000/- per month. From Annexure P-2, it is abundantly clear that the engagement is part time and on contract basis terminable without notice. The petitioners are working since August, 2009. Respondent no.3-institute, where the petitioners were appointed after selection has issued a fresh advertisement dated 20.1.2010 again inviting applications for engagement of Lecturers in various disciplines specified therein for the current session i.e. May/June, 2010. The petitioners have challenged the aforesaid advertisement. The apprehension of the petitioners is that they will be replaced by the persons in the similar manner. CWP. No. 1273 of 2010 -2- It is settled preposition of law that a temporary arrangement cannot be replaced by the temporary arrangement. The petitioners cannot be replaced by similar temporary arrangement unless they suffer any disqualification or their performance is said to be unsatisfactory. In view of the above circumstances, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents that the petitioner be not replaced by similar temporary arrangement unless their performance is unsatisfactory. However, respondents are at liberty to fill up the vacancies by regular appointments, if, so desired. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 27.1.2010. lucky