% I$ 51919 99Mh IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) W.P. (S) No. W h § /201 1 K‘ PETITIONER : Parmanand Kaushik, S/o. Shri Ganga Ram Kaushik, aged about K, 48 years, working as Revenue Inspector (Regular), Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS (1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Revenue 85 Disaster Management Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ry, (2) Director, Revenue Department, Raipur (C.G.) (3)” Commissioner, O/o. Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) r (4) Collector, Land Record, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF TNDIA $ ~ HIGH COURT OF CHHATJ‘ISGARH AT RH .ASPI IR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 4845 0f2011 ParmanandKaushik. VER SI IS State of Chhattisgarh £5 Others. RESPONDENTS WRIT PE’ITFTON UNDER ARTICI ,F, 226 OF THE CONSTITI “WON OF , INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Pregent: §hn Vmod Deshmukh Advocate for the petmnner Shrx VVb Voormy, Deputy Advocate General for the State/rewondents Shri S.P. Navralna, Dy. Commissiuner (R), Bilaspur, is present. ORDER ORAL) (Pasged on 06 . day af September, 201 1) L At the very outsetg Slm' Moorthy, learned ccumel appearing for the Siam/respondents, on mstmctions, submits that the order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexure P/l) 'nnpugled herein; has not been passed by a Competent. authority in accordance with Rule 20, Part II, of the Madhya. Pradash/Chhamsgarh Land Record Manual? thus; the same is unsustainable in law aud Shall not be given effect to, 2. In View of the above submission made by learned State counsel, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjugiication at this stage, 3. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 12‘082011 (Annexure P/l) is quashed. However? liberty is reserved to the State/respondents to pass appropriate order, if so advised, in aecordanee with law, in administrative exigency and in public interest. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 4. The writ petition isallowed. No order asto eosts. i