CRLR No. 88 of 2004 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate present for the revisionists. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate present for respondent No. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No 2 states that in view of order dated 11.09.2007, passed by the Judge, Family Court, Haridwar, in Misc. Case No. 232 of 2005, under Section 127(1) of Cr.P.C. for further enhancement of the amount of maintenance, this revision has become infructuous. The revision is di smissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 23.03.2010 HN