^— <^ ^^'. ^" IN THE HIGH COUKT OF CHHATTeS.WH AT mi^SPUR Vftit Petition No.^^?_/2002 PFTmONER .- Raine^hKimTai'Jamnadas&'Iirara, irfcriersl'd.p Firaxi, Through Parta.er hsjshikarifc Jainnajdas Mirasrii, S/o Janrtnadas EhaiMram,; Aged about 45 years., R/o Sliankar Niwas, Gb^di'Chowk, Faipfur(CG«) ~ Veraasr- ^^°B "\VO-N K^PONDENTS .y ^^ ^' •[^'w^^?yw»m^^.|.Bj;|Uli^P^- L Sfcate of ChlMtfcisgarli/ Thx-ough Secretos.y Etepartm.ent of Finance, MaritraJ.aya, %iastri Choivk/ I^ipur(CG.) 2. Conitrd^sioiier^ Qximienial Tax, Raipur(CG.) 3. Qiliattisgaxii State MWLOT Foresi Prodtice (Trading and Developm-ent)/ Co-operative Fedet'ation Ltcl, Through Ite Managiiig Ored-or, J-10, Anupam Nffgar/ RQipur(CG.) Union of India, Through Sect'etaty, Department of .CofxirnercialTax, \....^'"' New D^lhi. /WRFT pETmoN UNDER ARHCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE,_ _IATURE_____QF_^MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARL_ETC__QR_AIY^22!IR..^IRECTIQ1_.OR )RDER TO DO JUSTICE IT? THE MATTER. ^^^s: 1111 ^.^ \ •^s^t 1 'C^SQ^ fi K ^.: v^/^ Rl:!rt%iaSi<92^ •t1 !B: ^Riii. P>»^l;i|5;^,':> ^T^r^T'R^N? 'cCT 3^ff 9n*<iq» ^ Go^ NTRR'tT Slt*l|Ct» '3'^T '^i<4l<r(<4, ^rll-!-)^^, r®ldl^l|,< ..^.^^;..^.. [61 / ^S% 200 ^n^r XRW (li<bi^<^) ^wiW ^fta ^i^v SB : Hon'bleShri Satish K. Aaniho 1-10-2010 Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Shr Sharma, Shri B.D. Guru, Shri Par Tiwari, Shri Ajay Mishra, Shri Ha Patel, Shri Ratan Pusty, Shri Dalpati, Shri P.K. Badhuri &Shri for the respective petitioners. Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Depui State/respondents. Common order has been pjassed & delivered in W.P. No.2060 of 2002 (M/s Shyam Biri| Chhattisgarh & Others) including th| Signed and dated. On the request oflearned| petitioners, the effect and operat| M/s Shyam Biri Works Ltd. (su| matters shalt not be given effect tc from today. Certified copy as per judgment & order. Gni<i?<n<i1i 'W:R?ff <f fe1^t <f^^l< ^3tRyH3n^r LL Neelabh Dubey, Ms. Smiti |kaj Shrivastava, Shri V.R. 1-sh Wardhan, Shri Sanjay Imrito Das, Shri Akhilesh ^nup Majumdar, Advocates [y Advocate General for the Works Ltd. v. The State of is petition. [counsel appearing for the |on of the order passed in )ra) and other connected for a period of four weeks rules along with main Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^^^4^^^~rlTW, <W:<OTR-'I--S./147—2/2010-1,00,000. s&