IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID TUESDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2009 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 4961 of 2005(N) ----------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- T.SAROJINI, D/O.CHIRUTHA, 5/1444, KATTUVAYAL COLONY, ERANJIPALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE. BY ADVOCATE SMT.K.V.RESHMI RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE KOZHIKODE CORPORATION REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, KOZHIKODE. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. URBAN AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. T.K.VIPINDAS ADVOCATES MR.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN,SC,KOZHIKODE CORP FOR R1 MR.K.D.BABU,SC,KOZHIKODE CORPORATION FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/03/2009 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 4961 of 2005(N) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 - A TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 15.10.1996. EXT.P2 - A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 8.4.2003 SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. W EXT.P3 - A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 03.09.2003 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4 - A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 29.09.2003 SENT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER. EXT.P5 - A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 03.12.2003 SENT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER. EXT.P6 - A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 03.07.2004 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER THROUGH NADAKAVU DES SEVA SANGHAM. // TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE rhs HARUN-UL-RASHID, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C)No. 4961 of 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T The writ petition is filed for a direction to the respondents to disburse of pension, balance gratuity, provident fund and other benefits of the petitioner's mother with statutory interest to the petitioner. In the counter affidavit filed by the corporation it is stated that all the benefits except the provident fund was disbursed to the petitioner and in the provident fund account of the deceased, there is a credit of Rs.70/- and that the corporation is ready to disburse the amount as and when requested by the petitioner. The above statement is recorded and the writ petition is closed. HARUN-UL-RASHID JUDGE rhs