IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 19864 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.08.2011 Vipin ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Godara, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. The petitioner was initially released on bail and had been regularly appearing before the court below. He absented himself on 3.5.2011. However, he surrendered in the court on 14.5.2011 and since then he is in custody. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on account of illness, exemption from personal appearance was sought from the court. However, the same was declined. Thereafter, the petitioner himself surrendered after 11 days. The aforesaid facts are not disputed by the learned counsel for the State. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the contentions as noticed above, in my opinion, the petitioner deserves the concession of bail pending trial. He is directed to be released on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Rohtak. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 24.08.2011 sharmila