IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.14056 of 2005 Between: The Commissioner, Mancherial Municipality, Mancherial, Adilabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Chairman, Induatrial-Cum-labour court, Godavarikhani, Rep by its Presiding Officer, Karimnagar district. 2 Vanamala Narasimha Rao, S/o.Balanarasaiah, H.No.13-92/1, Chintapandu Wada, Mancherial, Adilabad district. 3 The Director Of Municipal Administration, MCH Complex, Near Tank Bund, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the Records relating the I.D.No.146 of 2003 on the file of Chairman, Industrial Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Godavarikhani, dated 31.01.2005 which was published vide G.O.Rt.No.814, dated 02.04.2005 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently set aside the same and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: S.NAGESWARA REDDY (SC FOR MUNC,TELANGANA) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.14056 OF 2005 O R D E R The Commissioner, Mancherial Municipality, Mancherial, challenges the Award dated 31.01.2005 in I.D.No.146 of 2003 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Godavarikhani. The I.D. was filed by one Vanamala Narsimha Rao, a daily wage NMR employee whose services were terminated by the Municipality along with 16 others. The 16 other employees whose services were so terminated, approached the Labour Court-I, Hyderabad, by way of I.D.Nos.79 and 93 to 108 of 1997. Having suffered an adverse common Award in those I.Ds., the Municipality approached this Court by way of W.P.No.6160 of 1999. The said writ petition was dismissed by a learned Judge of this Court by order dated 22.11.2002 holding that there was no illegality in the said Award. As Vanamala Narsimha Rao, the petitioner in I.D.No.146 of 2003, the second respondent in this writ petition, stands on the same footing as the 16 employees whose cases were considered in I.D.Nos.79 and 93 to 108 of 1997 by way of the common Award dated 07.09.1998 which was confirmed by this Court in W.P.No.6160 of 1999, I see no reason to differ with the finding of this Court in the said writ petition. Therefore, no reasons are made out to interfere with the Award under challenge. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ----------------------------- SANJAY KUMAR, J. 15th OCTOBER, 2009. PGS