Criminal Misc. No. M-6896 of 2009 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Criminal Misc. No. M-6896 of 2009 Date of Decision: 27.3.2009 Loona Ram …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Amrik Singh Kalra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the State. Mr. Lajwant Singh Virk, Advocate for the complainant. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 427 dated 16.12.2008 registered at Police Station Abohar, District Ferozepur, under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC. On 10.3.2009, this Court had passed the following order:- “Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he had purchased the combine vide agreement (Annexure P1). It is submitted that Rs.4,00,000/- were to be paid by the petitioner to the complainant. Rs.2,50,000/- were paid and Rs.1,50,000/- were the Criminal Misc. No. M-6896 of 2009 2 balance. Allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner had obtained duplicate registration certificate of the combine by forging the signatures of the complainant. Counsel for the petitioner further stated that it is to be proved during the course of trial. Further stated that offence, if any, is based on the documents and custodial interrogation is not necessary. Issue notice of motion to learned Advocate General, Punjab, for 27.3.2009. Meanwhile, in the event of arrest, petitioner shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. Petitioner shall join investigation as and when called for. Petitioner shall also abide by the conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.” Counsel for the State, on instructions from Amar Nath, Sub Inspector, submits that petitioner has joined investigation and has given his specimen handwriting in the Court on the asking of the Investigating Officer. Mr. Brar further submits that as per his instructions, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. At this stage, Mr. Lajwant Singh Virk, Advocate, appearing for the complainant, submits that duplicate Registration Certificate of the Combine has not been recovered. Non-recovery of the duplicate Registration Certificate can be explained by the accused at the time of trial. If it is not explained, it will Criminal Misc. No. M-6896 of 2009 3 be open for the Court to draw adverse inference. In view of the statement made by counsel for the State and order dated 10.3.2009 passed by this Court, interim pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioner is affirmed till filing of the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. On submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. petitioner shall furnish regular bail-bonds to the Court concerned. With these observations, present petition is disposed off. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge March 27, 2009 “DK”