IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION SUIT NO.13 OF 1999 SUIT NO.13 OF 1999 SUIT NO.13 OF 1999 IN IN IN PETITION NO.29 OF 1996. PETITION NO.29 OF 1996. PETITION NO.29 OF 1996. Chandrakant Govindrao Mahimkar @ Nana ..Plaintiff versus Ms.Roma S. Mahimkar ..Defendant. Ms.Yamini Guda i/b/ M/s. Hanakchand & Co. for plaintiff Mr.P.N.Patwardhan for the Defendants. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 2nd Mar, 2006 Dated : 2nd Mar, 2006 Dated : 2nd Mar, 2006 P.C. 1. Placed before me for speaking to minutes. 2. Heard both the learned Advocates. 3. After the first paragraph of the order dated 23.12.2005 add the words "Decree be drawn in terms of consent terms". Thereafter the sentence issue necessary court fee refund certificate is deleted. 4. After the words "Commissioner Stands discharged" add words "Without submitting report. Hence, now the order is read as under: . Learned Advocates for the parties tendered consent terms. The consent terms signed by the parties and their respective advocates are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. . Decree be drawn in terms of consent terms. . Commissioner stands discharged without submitting report. . The Commissioner to return the documents to the concerned parties who have produced the same. . The Commissioner’s fees are to be borne equally and the same be paid directly to the Commissioner. (S.R.Sathe, J.)