IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No. 252 of 2002 in Letters Patent Appeal St.No. 21546 of 2002 in Writ Petition No. 4944 of 2001 Shri M.B.Kamble ..Petitioner vs. Atkas Copco India Ltd. ..Respondent Shri A.S.Rao for petitioner Shri Sanjay Udeshi i/b M/s Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for respondent. CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.U.KAMDAR JJ. S.U.KAMDAR JJ. S.U.KAMDAR JJ. 22nd September, 2004 22nd September, 2004 22nd September, 2004 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Advocates. 2. In view of the order in L.P.A. this civil application does not survive and hence civil application is rejected. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No. 251 of 2002 in Letters Patent Appeal St.No. 21546 of 2002 in Writ Petition No. 4944 of 2001 Shri M.B.Kamble ..Petitioner vs. Atkas Copco India Ltd. ..Respondent Shri A.S.Rao for petitioner Shri Sanjay Udeshi i/b M/s Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for respondent. CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.U.KAMDAR JJ. S.U.KAMDAR JJ. S.U.KAMDAR JJ. 22nd September, 2004 22nd September, 2004 22nd September, 2004 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Advocates. 2. Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Delay in filing the L.P.A. is condoned. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Letters Patent Appeal St.No. 21546 of 2002 in Writ Petition No. 4944 of 2001 Shri M.B.Kamble ..Petitioner vs. Atkas Copco India Ltd. ..Respondent Shri A.S.Rao for petitioner Shri Sanjay Udeshi i/b M/s Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for respondent. CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & CORAM: A.P.SHAH & S.U.KAMDAR JJ. S.U.KAMDAR JJ. S.U.KAMDAR JJ. 22nd September, 2004 22nd September, 2004 22nd September, 2004 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Advocates. 2. We are not inclined to entertain the appeal at this stage. Writ Petition is pending before the learned single Judge and notice has been issued for final disposal of the petition. 3. It would be open for the petitioners to raise all contentions as and when the appeal is filed against the final order passed by the learned single Judge. 4. Appeal is accordingly disposed of.