IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2011 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 6785 of 2011(W) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.A.REENA , HEADMISTRESS, P.M.L.P.SCHOOL, KIRALUR, THALAPPALLY, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.S.SUJIN SMT.NITA.N.S. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE MANAGER, P.M.L.P.SCHOOL KIRALUR ,THALAPPILLY TALUK,THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER VADAKKANCHERRY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.6785/2011-W ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 4 th day of March, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner seeks for a direction to the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P4 representation. 2. The petitioner while working as Headmistress of the school was suspended by the Manager on 16/06/2009. The complaint was regarding the issuance of transfer certificate to 28 students. Ultimately, the matter was finalised as per Ext.P2 Government Order. Therein, the order passed by the District Educational Officer as per Ext.P1 to reinstate the petitioner in service was upheld by the Government. It is in these circumstances, the petitioner has filed Ext.P4 representation seeking for regularisation of the period of suspension as duty and for payment of salary. 3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, to the information of the petitioner, the Manager has not challenged Ext.P2 in any proceedings. 4. There will be a direction to the second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P4 representation W.P.(C). No.6785/2011 -:2:- after hearing the petitioner and the Manager within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of the Judgment before the second respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE