CWP(T) No. 7997/2008 02.12.2010 Present: Mr. S. R. Sharma, vice Mr. B. N. Misra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. A.G. for the respondents-State Petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- (a) That the respondents may kindly be directed to regularise the services of the applicant as Nursery Watcher from 1997 i.e. on his completion of 8 years of service as Daily Wages Nursery Watcher as per the policy framed by the State Govt. with all consequential benefits like arrears along with interest and seniority etc. (b) That the respondents may kindly be directed to pay the enhanced wages to the applicant for the year 1-1-1994 to 1-8-95 at the rate of Rs.21.75 per day alongwith interest at the rate of 18% per annum because the applicant is to pay due to increased wages by the Govt. from back date. (c) That the entire record pertaining to the case may kindly be summoned. (d) That the present application may kindly be allowed with the costs throughout. 2. Qua relief No. (a), it is apparent from Annexure R-1 that from the year 1990 petitioner worked with the respondents but however it is also evident that he worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year only w.e.f. 1996. 3. Reply was filed in the year 2002. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has no instructions as to whether petitioner’s services stand regularized after completion of period of 10 years counting from the year 1996 onwards. 4. There is no dispute that State of Himachal Pradesh has framed certain policies of giving benefits and according work charged status/regularizing those employees who complete more than 10 years of service. 5. Under the circumstances, direction is issued to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization, if already not done. Needful be positively done within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. 6. With respect to relief No.(b), it stands clarified by the respondents that all enhanced wages have been uniformly paid to all employees of the State. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed with respect to this relief. With the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed off. December 02, 2010 ( Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.