IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. (S/S) 261 of 2011 Bheem Singh and others …Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ….Respondents Present : Mr. K. N. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N. P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. K. N. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. N. P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. Rejoinder affidavit filed in Court today is taken on record. 3. The contention of the petitioners is that they were “Shiksha Acharya” and now under the Government Orders they are liable to be made “Shiksha Mitra”. All the same, the names of the petitioners have been sent by the Block Education Officer to the District Education Officer. 4. Based on the contention of the petitioners, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Education Officer to dispose of the representations of the petitioners and in case he deems fit and proper that the petitioners are liable to be made “Shiksha Mitra” pass appropriate orders within a period of three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. 8. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 22.11.2011 Kuldeep