IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.167 of 2000 RAJENDRA PRASAD SHAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 16. 18.9.2008. Today also, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner whereas learned counsel for opposite parties is present. This Cr. Revision has been filed against the order of acquittal dated 27.1.2000 passed by Sri R. D. Paswan, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Aurangabad in G. R. No. 1676/95, Tr. No. 142/2000. It is submitted on behalf of opposite parties that they took loan from Bihar State Financial Corporation, Magadh Branch Gaya for running Sodium Silicate Factory. According to the prosecution story, the mortgaged materials and machines were removed by opposite parties without payment of the loan in order to deprive the Bihar State Financial Corporation from realizing loan amount from the assets of the factory. It is submitted that however, now the matter has already been settled between the parties and through one time settlement the entire dues amount has been paid and - 2 - thereafter the Corporation has given no dues certificate in favour of M/s Heera Chemicals. It is further submitted that since the matter has already been settled between the parties, the petitioner has now no interest in pursuing the case. Considered the submission of learned counsel for opposite parties as well as the facts and circumstances of the case. It is quite apparent that the petitioner has no interest in this case as the matter has already been settled and the loan has been liquidated. Under the facts and circumstances, this application is dismissed. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)