ry PE' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH iBilASPUR WRJT PETiTiONlS) NQ. 4823 OF 2008. TjONER RaiivYadav RESPONDENTS Versus Chhattisaarh Gramln Bank & Another (Writ Petitlon under Article 225 of the Constituiion of !ndia) Singfe Bench : Hors'bSe Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 'reseni:- Pracii-ian, ytiri Vinod uesnmukn. Advocaie 'or ins petiijoner Shri Pramod Verma. Sr- Advocate with Snri Advocate for the respondents. uRuEg.fQRAlj ipl's<wf r." thre 4'" rtgv nf h4av 9rt11' ^i" s.riOiiSt.f^i t>E i Ls it^ "^' 4uiGty t«?i {fECt:^"; —.Vl E^ Heard iearned counsei for the oarties. At e verv outset. Shri Verma. iearned Senior counse! apoearing for the respondents, submits that the poiicy prevajent at the tJrne of making or apDilcation for arant of comDassionat®aooointment wouiii be aoDlicabie ror consiaeration or me aDDiicatson. in view of that. rt is not necessarv io adiudicate uDon the dispute. However, the rsspondent authorities mav consider the appjication of the oetitioner In accordance with the Drevaiiina law and ooiicv, as aforestated, on Its own merits and pass ordsr, as expedltiousiy as possible preferably withsn a oerjod of four weeks, in view of the fact that '^'^j^ •'^ i^ y'^l.i/^^'-^'itr^?^ 'f^' 1?^> ?' f^'^^^'y^y ^^ ^ ^t.?^'^+^^-SC^^ fl i'^ll^^^.'N ^*:-L"^ ?*•-•^.^ ^^^'•^*^^^ El^~' UW yjy.U^e^s.iUf' ii? sy? ^ioHs. ui c/<^Hr'ysi&^iUiieai.s iayi^ysHi.L^^ni. /^^s''!5^c*£d^? ^?^?B%^v^.^^i^-^ ^^v*.y ^^.^i '^.^^T^-i^^^f^y •^ < !^5h*^'t^r<^ •^^xsi' ^'s^l ^A~?-^^ lj--*rfaf^?i^/-^ ^•i' —^ctHit;^vUUUS'^1 efyy^QiiU^ i^i i.Ufc? 3.J<5i.ii.,EUi i^?; SUvi53i!in3 iUdS. igU UiC iy;Sf¥'Ei31 informations necessarv for consideration of the aDpilcation of ths Detitioner shaii be suoplied to the resoondent authorities wltriin a Deriod OT ©HSWS©K. AccordinaSy. ihe writ oeiit'on is disoosed of Sd/- SatjshK. Agnlhotri Judge •^iOv^Ti