IN THE HIGH CORUT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NTAINAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 636 of 2008 Maninder Singh. ……………Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ………….. Respondents Mr. J.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 to 3. None for the respondents 4. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. J.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 to 3. None for the respondents 4. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition field by the petitioners, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against the petitioner before the Circle Officer concerned on 10.10.2008 and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit the chargesheet before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 11.08.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 16.02.2009 V.K.