Criminal Misc.-M No. 27807 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 27807 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.10.2011 Deepika .. Petitioner Vs. State of U.T., Chandigarh .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Gagneshwar Walia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D. D. Sharma, Advocate for U.T., Chandigarh. ... Rajesh Bindal J. At the time of issuance of notice of motion on13.9.2011, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner were noticed: “Learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance upon an earlier order passed by this court in CRM-M No. 23952 of 2011 –Surjit Singh vs State of UT Chandigarh on 6.9.2011 in the case of the husband of the petitioner, where after hearing learned counsel for Union Territory of Chandigarh, pre-arrest bail was granted to the petitioner therein. The case set up by the petitioner therein was that he was living separate from the family of the deceased.” Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner has delivered a baby on 18.10.2011 by cesarian operation. Learned counsel for U.T., Chandigarh did not dispute that facts of the present case are identical to Surjit Singh's case (supra), who is husband of the petitioner, as it is claimed that the couple was residing separate. Criminal Misc.-M No. 27807 of 2011 [2] Considering the contentions raised by learned counsel for the parties, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 13.9.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 19.10.2011 mk