-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3805 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 3805 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 3805 OF 2008 Shre Dutta Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited : Petitioner v/s Industrial Credit Controller West Castrol India Limited : Respondent V.B. Rajure advocate for petitioners Coram : A.A. Sayed,J Date:27.6.2008 P.C. 1. The application of the petitioner to amend the plaint has been rejected. It is not disputed that the evidence has been closed and the suit is kept for final arguments. The amendment sought was in respect of some mistake in the figures which apparently came to the notice of the petitioner only after the evidence of the auditor. 2. In my view the discretion exercised by the trial court in rejecting application cannot be said to be injudicious. Hence no interference is called for in the impugned order. 3. However since the figures according to the petitioner are bonafide typing mistakes and that the same were made inadvertently, liberty is granted to -2- the petitioner to raise this plea to the extent that the same was not intentional at the time of final arguments and in further proceedings that may be filed. 4. With the above observations and liberty, the petition is dismissed. (A.A. Sayed,J.)