: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.141 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8065 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9397 OF 2004 Udharam A. Parwani since deceased, represented by his legal heirs 1. Pushpa w/o. Udharam A. Parwani & Ors. ..Petitioners. Vs. Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Hitesh P. Vyas for the Petitioners. Mr.A.N.Samant for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2008 DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2008 DATED : 12TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : Even assuming that the conduct of the Respondents was hasty and excessive, it is difficult to take action in contempt against them in view of the observations in the order dated 29.4.2008 in Civil Application No.988 of 2008 inter-alia to the effect that the stand-off between the parties originated from the inaction or delayed action on the part of the Assistant Registrar in the Writ Petition branch of this Court. Only in view thereof, no action in contempt is called for. : 2 : 2. Contempt Petition is dismissed. 3. The Petitioner is at liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings for the purpose of recovery of any damages which may have been caused as a result of the alleged illegal action. ***