:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 28 OF 1988 NO. 28 OF 1988 NO. 28 OF 1988 State Bank of India. ...Plaintiffs. V/s. M/s. Zaveri Traders & Ors. ... Defendants. None for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendants. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 24TH 24TH 24TH NOVEMBER 2008. NOVEMBER 2008. NOVEMBER 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . None appears for the Plaintiff - Bank, although the Office report shows that the State Bank of India is duly served. The matter was placed before me earlier and noticing that the Plaintiffs’ Advocates were present and the Plaintiffs are not giving any instructions to their Advocate, I discharged the Advocates and directed issuance of notice to the Bank. The Plaintiffs - Bank has received the notice but is absent today. The Suit is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)