'^'^ssysiv-'-. BBSft ^^:^st:- wws K9S8 ^lM^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CGI CWIL^EVISION NO......U............../20fis9^'S sx CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTIONJIS^, CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 APPELLANTS DEFENDANTS N0. 1 TO 3 :<<^-"^ x'^" o- RESPONDENTS 1. Durga. Prasad Upadhyay, S/o Late Babulal Upadhyay, Aged 43 years, Occupation - Not Known, R/o Ward No. -9, Sakti, Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir Champa (CG. 2. Preetam Singh Gabel, Late Shri Premsingh Gabel, Aged 54 years, Occupation - Business, R/o Transport Nagar, Sakti, Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir Champa (CG. 3. Trilikchand Jaiswal, S/o Late Shri Ganpat Lal Jaiswal, Aged 49 years, Occupation - Business, R/oWardNo.8, Sakti, Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir Champa (CG. VERSUS 1. Shyam Sunder Agrawal, S/o Late Mangatram Agrawal, Aged 55 years, Occupation - Business, .2. • Radheshyam Agrawal, S/o Late Mangatran-i Agrawal, Aged 62 years, Occupation - Business 3. Kailashchand Agrawal, S/o Late Mangatram Agrawal, Aged 50 years, Occupation - Business, 4. Gayatri Devi, Wd/o Late Omprakash, Aged 63 years,. ."<- -E" ^te. All R/o Hatari Chowk, Ward No. 8, Sakti, Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir Champa (CG.) L -PLANTIFFS) 5. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Collector, District Janjgir Champa (CG.) L DEFENDANT N0. 4) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CIVIL REVISiON N0.18 OF 2011 .1 TO 3 Durga Prasad Upadhyaya and others. Versus RESPONDENTS Shyam Sunder Agrawat and others. CiVIL REViSION UNDER SECTiON 115 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.1908 (Sinale Bench: Hon'bie Shri N.K. Aaarwal. J.) Present : Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, counsei for the applicants. Shri Vinod Tekam, Panei Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 09th day of February, 2011) Learned counsel for the applicants seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this revision with liberty to avai! the appropriate remedy that may be available to them under the provisions of lav/. 2. Liberty is granted, as prayed for. 3. Accordingiy, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants prays that certified copy of the impugned order be returned to him. 5. Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order on counsel's furnishing authenticated true copy ofthe.same. . <- " --——- Sd/- N.K. Agarwai Judge -Kvr