HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR C.M.A. No.3371 OF 2003 DATED:10.09.2009 BETWEEN: Pola Lakshman Rao …Appellant and Smt. Borra Hymavathi & Another. …Respondents COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT: MR.M.NARENDER REDDY COUNSEL FOR 1ST RESPONDENT:MR. BANKATLAL MANDHANI COUNSEL FOR 2ND RESPONDENT: NONE THIS COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR C.M.A. No.3371 OF 2003 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.Gopal Reddy) This appeal by the 1st defendant in the suit is filed against the orders of III Additional District Judge, Warangal, dated 29.8.2003 in I.A.No.321 of 2002 in O.S.No.14 of 2002 whereby the learned trial judge allowed the I.A. filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 C.P.C. for attachment of schedule property belonging to the appellant herein. This Court in C.M.P.No.21465 of 2003 passed the following order: “The Court below, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner in I.A.No.321 of 2002, granted time to the appellant to cross- examine the witness and posted the matter on 29.8.2003. On 29.8.2003, the learned III Additional District Judge, Warangal, without recording any reasons, allowed the application. In the circumstances, we deem it appropriate to suspend the impugned order.” The above order is in force for the last six years. On the last occasion, when the matter came up before us on 03.09.2009, we called for a report from the lower Court as to the status of the suit, and that the report discloses that the suit is posted for arguments today. Under those circumstances, the lower Court is directed to dispose of the suit before the end of October, 2009 and report compliance thereof. Till such time, the order of interim suspension granted on 03.09.2009 shall remain in force. With the above direction, the appeal is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J. _______________________ SEPTEMBER 10, 2009 B.CHANDRA KUMAR, J. Tsr.