IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4702 of 2009 MD.BARIQUE @ BARIQUE Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.05.2009 No body appears on behalf of the petitioner as well as on behalf of the State. The petitioner, who is an accused in Complaint Case No.1689 of 2007, registered under section 420 IPC, has approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail. The allegation(s) in the complaint is/are that the petitioner demanded 53 pieces of wood which was/were received by the complainant in auction sale by paying a sum of Rs.11,935/- and the logs/woods were transported to the industry of the petitioner. It is the complainant’s case that subsequently the amount of logs/woods was not paid to him. From the impugned order, it appears that the petitioner herein has also lodged Araria P.S.Case no.405/08 against the complainant under sections 406 and 420/34 IPC in relation to the supply of certain pieces of woods/logs. It is the case of the petitioner the complainant raised a civil dispute. Having regard to the facts appearing from the records, including the impugned order, this Court is satisfied that a case for extension of privilege of anticipatory bail is made out. The petitioner abovenamed, in the event of - 2 - arrest/surrender, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Araria in Complaint Case No.1689 of 2007, on the conditions as contained in section 438(2) Cr.P.C. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )