IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9339 of 2011 SHREE NATH PD.SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 22.06.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 11.12.2009 passed by the Presiding Officer, Lok Adalat, Vaishali at Hajipur in Misc. Case No.330 of 2009 by which the Misc. Case filed by the petitioner has been dismissed on the ground that the Lok Adalat has got no jurisdiction to either recall or modify or alter the award passed on compromise between the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that by playing fraud on the petitioner, the respondent nos.2 and 3 got the compromise filed in the Lok Adalat and on the basis of the compromise, Lok Adalat has passed the award. So far this question is concerned, i.e. regarding fraud, in my opinion, Lok Adalat has rightly observed that it has got no jurisdiction to entertain the said application. From perusal of the impugned order, it further appears that liberty has been granted to the petitioner to move appropriate forum by filing appropriate application. In such view of the matter, I find that it is not a fit case where supervisory 2 jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India should be exercised. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. If so advised, the petitioner may move before appropriate forum for redressal of his grievances. Saurabh ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)