1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.216 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra : Applicant V/s. Appasaheb Dinkar Patil & Ors. : Respondents (Orig.Accused Nos.1 to 6) .... Mr.P.S.Hingorani, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the applicant. .... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : APRIL 06, 2010. P.C.: Taken up for hearing. Heard the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the applicant. 2. This Revision Application challenges the order dated 10.6.2009 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Jaysingpur, in Criminal Appeal No.13 of 2007, thereby dismissing the appeal filed by the State which was in turn filed challenging the order passed by the JMFC, Jaysingpur, dated 9.2.2007 thereby acquitting the accused for the offence punishable under sections 498-A, 323 and 504 of the I.P.C. 3. Both the Courts have found that the prosecution did not lead the 2 evidence of the complainant regarding ill-treatment and physical abuses to the victim. It has further been found that the evidence of the other prosecution witnesses was not also in consonance with the evidence of the complainant. 4. No perversity is found in the concurrent orders of the Courts below warranting interference. Hence, the Criminal Revision Application is dismissed. B. R. GAVAI, J.