IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.626 of 2008 1. RAMA KANT PANDEY 2. Sanjay Kumar Pandey Both sons of Late ram Vyash Pandey Resident of Village Mitihara, PO Kukurha Anchal Itarhi, PS No.15, District Buxar…………. Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Director of Consolidation, Bihar, Patna 3. The Deputy Director of Consolidation, Bhojpur 4. The Consolidation Officer, Itarhi, Buxar 5. The Assistant Consolidation Officer,Itarhi, Buxar …..Respondents 1st set 6. Ramjash Pandey 7. Ganga Dayal Pandey Both Sons of Radha Kishun Pandey 8. Bipin Kumar Pandey son of Late Ram Bachan Pandey All are residents of Village Mitihara, PO Kukurha, Anchal Itarhi, District Buxar ….. Respondents IInd set ….. Respondents ----------- 02- 18.3.2009 Heard Mr. Vijayendra Nath for the petitioners, and Mr. Ram Chandra Prasad Bharti, learned Standing Counsel no.14. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 31.7.2007 (Annexure 2), passed by respondent no.2 in purported exercise of powers under Section 35 of the Consolidation Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that respondent no.2 has exercised revisional powers even though consolidation proceedings had concluded in terms of Section 26A of the Act. He further submits that Title Suit No.273/05 inter parties is pending wherein the petitioners herein are defendants and the subject matter of the present proceeding is under adjudication. In that view of the matter, as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is disposed of to enable them to pursue the suit. It goes without saying that the orders of the revisional authorities are subject to the decisions of the civil court, and - 2 - the order impugned herein shall not prejudice the parties in the suit. 2. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. ( S K Katriar ) mrl