IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 2006 of 2008 Between: Mattepu Kondaswamy, S/o Mala Kondaiah, R/o D.No.9-11-21/2, Near Ganapati Center, Nidadavole, W.G.Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P., rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 2 Tummalapalli Rama Sai Naga Venkata Satyanarayana, S/o Krishnamurthy, R/o Nidadavole, Nidadavile Mandal, W.G.Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto quash the complaint/charge-sheet against the petitioner in Cr.No.14 of 2008 of Nidadavole Police Station, W.G.Dist. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.RAJU, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER PSR, J. Crl.P.No. 2006 of 2008 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. Notice is not served on the second respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the notice is served on the second respondent; but there is no material. However, in view of the nature of the offence, which predominantly arises on account of a bounced cheque transaction, it is directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested till filing of the charge sheet if any. However, the investigation into the case and consequential proceedings based on the result of the investigation shall go on. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. Dated:29—01—2010. *BVS