IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31190 of 2010 KARANJEET SAHNI @ KARANJEET KUMAR SAHNI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Sangeeta Kumari ------ 5/ 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Act of the wife and husband earlier to marriage only was a circumstance forcing family members of both to marry them, as it is alleged that after alluring to marry, she was committed rape by this petitioner then only marriage is solemnized. She gave birth of a female child, thereafter demand comes in picture which is the reason for torture is not believed for anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 92 of 2009 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Rosera, Samastipur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)