MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.60 OF 2006 Bhagwan Shankardas Moorjani. ..Petitioner Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ..Respondents Petitioner in person present. Mrs. A.K. Savla for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. S.S. Joshi, for Respondent No.3. Mrs. V.N.Bangera, for respondent No.4. Mr.Milind More, A.G.P. for Respondent No.6. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 24th November, 2008 DATED: 24th November, 2008 DATED: 24th November, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . We are informed that respondent No.3 has already filed a Civil Suit challenging the auction of the building for recovery of municipal dues. The petitioner is occupant of the premises. At the highest on purchase by respondent No.4 the tenancy will be attorned in favour of the petitioner. 2. The respondent No.3 is the Developer who has constructed the building in which the petitioner has purchased a premises. Under these circumstances it will be open to the petitioner to apply for being joined as party in the suit already filed by the respondent No.3 or to file an independent suit. As the petitioner has alternative efficacious remedy in our opinion this would not be a fit case to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction. In the light of that petition disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue whatever remedy he has in law. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)