1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.3907 OF 1999. Deorao S/o Ganpati Dhakne ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and another ... Respondents. ... Mr.U.B.Bondar, advocate for the petitioner. Mrs.R.K.Ladda, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for the State. ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3908 OF 1999. Ashruba Shyama Chaure ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and another ... Respondents. ... Mr.U.B.Bondar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.N.B.Patil, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for the State. Mr.B.B.Kulkarni, advocate for the Respondent No. 1. 2 CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 02.08.2010. ORAL ORDER (Per B.R.Gavai,J.) 1. By the present petitions, the petitioners are claiming pension under the scheme framed by the State Government for Freedom Fighters. 2. According to the petitioners, they had taken part in Hyderabad Liberation Movement and warrants were issued against them. The petitioners, therefore, submit that the petitioners were entitled for pension under the Freedom Fighters Scheme. Justice Palkar, who was appointed under the directions of the Apex Court has found that the warrants on the basis of which the petitioners claim for pension were itself fake. It is further to be noted that even District Gaurav Committee has not recommended the case of the petitioners. 3. In that view of the matter, no case is 3 made out. The petitions are dismissed. Rule discharged. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (B.R.GAVAI,J.) asp/office/wp390799