-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No.119 of 2008 IN S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.1317 of 2000. Mus. Banarsi Devi wife of Shri Hanuman Prasad VERSUS Madan Lal son of Shri Bhonre Lal and Others Date of Order :::: 13/08/2010 Hon'ble Mr.Justice Dalip Singh Mr. M.L. Goyal, Counsel for the applicant-appellant *** Prayer made in the aforesaid application is that the name of Smt. Sharda Pathak, the counsel for the insurance company, respondent No.5, may be ordered to be shown in the presence of the counsel in the order dated 05.10.2007. It is submitted that the appeal came to be decided along with the other similar appeal whereas in the instant appeal `vakalatnama' on behalf of the insurance company respondent No.5 had been filed by Smt. Sharda Pathak counsel for the said New India Assurance Company. I have perused the record and I find that the `Vakalatnama' of Smt. Sharda Pathak, Advocate is filed on the record on behalf of the New India Assurance Company Limited entered at Inward No.4212 dated 24.02.2006. Accordingly, the application is allowed. Presence of Smt. Sharda Pathak counsel for the respondent No.5-New India Assurance Company Limited shall be read in the judgment dated 05.10.2007. -2- This miscellaneous application stands disposed of accordingly. (Dalip Singh),J. Ashok/