IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.709 of 2007 SHAMBHU PRASAD MANDAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 3.7.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is the informant. He is assailing the impugned judgment dated 25.4.2007 passed in Sessions Trial No.34/2004/331/2004 (T.R. No. 279/2007) whereunder Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 4 have been acquitted of the offences under Sections 307/324 of the Penal Code but convicted for the offences under Sections 323 and 341 of the Penal Code and released on probation in terms of Section 3 of the Probation of Offenders Act. 3. Counsel for the petitioner assails the said judgment in view of the fact that one of the injured regained consciousness after three days and appreciating such fact conviction should be under Section 307 of the Penal Code. Such aspect of the matter was considered by the court below and the court below after taking into account the evidence of P.Ws. 1, 5 and 8 was satisfied that the offence under Sections 307 and 324 was not made out and proved accordingly, convicted Opposite Parties under Sections 323 and 341 of the Penal Code. I do not see any illegality in such conviction, accordingly this Criminal Revision Application is dismissed. Rajesh/ ( V.N.Sinha, J.) - 2 -