IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9580 of 2009 THE STATE OF BIHAR ……….. PETITIONER. Versus DINESH YADAV, SON OF RAM SWEAK YADAV @ RAM SAKAL YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-PACHRUKHIA, P.S.- KAKO (BHELWAR), DISTRICT-JEHANABAD. …. OPP. PARTY ----------- 3. 01.07.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the opposite party. This application has been filed on behalf of the State for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party namely Dinesh Yadav. The ground for cancellation is that during investigation one of the co-accused has made confessional statement against the petitioner showing involvement of the petitioner. Counsel for the State has not been able to show that except confessional statement there is any other evidence available in the case diary showing involvement of the petitioner in this case. Another ground for cancellation, as mentioned in the cancellation petition is petitioner’s involvement in a number of criminal cases. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of O.P., giving details of such cases. Altogether 11 cases have been mentioned out of which in 10 cases petitioner has already been acquitted and in one case the name of the O.P. has - 2 - come on suspicion in which a compromise petition has already been filed. Counsel for O.P. has also submitted that all these cases relate to land dispute. Considering this fact, I do not find any ground as made out for cancelling the anticipatory bail of O.P. Dinesh Yadav is dismissed. Sanjeet (Mridula Mishra, J)