IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 4022 of 2008 Decided on: 17.3.2011 Smt. Kamlesh Sharma …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : None. For the respondents : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Additional Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The case was taken up in the morning session, however, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Thereafter, the case has been taken up again at 2:30 p.m., but neither the petitioner is present in person nor represented by any Advocate. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge March 17, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?