IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 18TH MAGHA 1928 WP(C).No. 4142 of 2007(R) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ M. ABOOBAKKAR, S/O.LATE KUNJALIKUTTY HAJI, AGED 54 YEARS, THEKKETHODY HOUSE, PERUMUGHAM P.O., FEROKE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.J.JOY SRI.V.J.JAMES RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE PROJECT OFFICER, ITDP ATTAPPADI, AGALI P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. THE SECRETARY, ATTAPPADY BLOCK PANCHAYAT5H, ATTAPPADI, AGALI P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE GENERAL MANAGER, NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNEMNT RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1, R3 & R5 BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.T.B.RAMANI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. .......................................................... W.P.(C) No.4142 OF 2007 ........................................................... DATED THIS THE 7TH FEBRUARY, 2007 J U D G M E N T I do not propose to consider the merits of the grounds raised. But Exts.P5 and P6 representations submitted by the petitioner are pending before the 1st respondent. In Exts.P5 and P6 the petitioner requests for reimbursement of the expenses already incurred by him in the execution of work which was done by him but abandoned half- way (not due to any fault on his part, he contends). Since Exts.P5 and P6 are pending before the 1st respondent, it is only appropriate that the 1st respondent takes them up, hears the petitioner and takes a correct and just decision on the same. Decision as directed above shall be taken at the 1st respondent's earliest and at any rate within six weeks of receiving copy of this judgment. (PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) tgl WP(C)N0.4142 OF 2007 -2-