IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2009 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 33618 of 2009(V) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ NINISH.V.P, S/O.NARAYANAN, MANDILICHIKANDI HOUSE, AKKAL.P.O, VADAKARA. BY ADV. MR.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VADAKARA. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. K.S.MUHAMED HASHIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.33618/2009 V APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DTD.22/11/07. P2: COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD. 21/06/2008. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 33618 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 15th December, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner's grievance in this writ petition is that his application for revision of his own timings has not been considered by the respondent. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that notice was issued to the petitioner to appear in person for considering whether a revision of his timings is warranted under law. But, the petitioner did not appear. It is further submitted that if the petitioner appears in person before the respondent, the petitioner's application for revision would be considered, taking into account whether there are circumstances warranting such revision. This is recorded and the writ petition is closed. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.