C ^^{QQl' SINGLE BENCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR wnt Petition No. / 2006 Petitioner (?^^ .^ ^s".' ^..^ •^-1. •(O-'t? ^ ^••">;f\0(..!. yy" ^.^- ^' ^- Respondent /^R.C. Sahu, Age 58 Yrs. S/o Late Jeevanlal Sahu Chief. Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Chura, Teh. Grariabancl, Raipur VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Anusuchit Janjati tatha Anusuchit ]ati Vikas Vibhag, M.antralaya, Raipur 2. R.S. Thakur, Age & S/o n-ot known Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Tokapal, Distt. Bastar WRIT PETITION U/A. 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION XI-HC-22 3^' ^I^ICltl, ®Tn<1'l<o,Rlc)l+l^< 3)1^1 <<ach iiini sniicfi •--•-••-"••••••/••••• gq- 200 R<)«A' an^rw f^irasn^T ShHltldfer sii^iiis+aisiTgfer 11-7-2006 forlthe Mr. ftoja Sharnia, counsel AAiss Deepali Pandey, Panel adyance copy. Hear-d. By this writ petition under A! petitioner has questioned the legaiil dated 28-6-2006, whereby the peti| Panchayat; Chura, District; Raipur Bastsr. The moin qround of chai!en9e| months at the prssent plscs of post| retire within a period of 1 year11 As per the Sovernment poiicy, at tlji be ailoreed to continue neapby th| transferred as thsir pension mattsr^ patient of breast ccncer, she is takij aunt is 75 years old widow and she i4 Lear-ned counse! for" the p|e difficulties, the petitioner may fc|< respondent No.l, to which ieQrnad c| No.l has no objection. Having heard learned couns^l facts and Circumstances of the caset, petitioner. Ljawyer for the State/respondent No.l, on •=t>i<<Fci<fl-i iiiciTfffe'd <Ri+<ii< ^q^irsn^T tticle 226 of the Constitution of India, ths [/, propriety and correctness of the order rtoner- has been transferred fr-om Janpod to Janpcd Panchayat; Tokspal, District: is that the petitioner hss compieted oniy 8 jng Qnd moreover, the petitioner is going to ffl^onths on cittcining the supersnnuation age. |e verge of retirement, the Officers must ;ir native place and they should not be is to be settied. Ths petitioner's wife is a ig treatment at Raipur, and the petitioner's residin9 with him. j^etitioner submits thdt raising ail these fc|e allowed to make a representation to luhsel appearing for the Stote/respondent for the parties anci having r-egard to the without expressin9 ony opinion on merit of Cfl^^^) *W^Xffi1j&WK€tKf^y,^vffy^f^... XI-HC-22 3^ •<<Nlrt<<, WTdyis, Rldiyy ^.^.:^..^..3?6JZ llW[Tsn*iiqi -------•••••--..•••"^q. 200 ^<)<d,' sn^rw )?^3TI^T aiiroolBn Soma <y ^ sn^TTOirargfer the case, the prayer mcde by iesrnee rsasonable. Therefore, the pe1 representstion rdsing s!i his grie* petition uuithin 10 days from today t< shail decide the representation with| an objective manner, in accordonce reiieved, he shouid not be r-elisved, With the directions sforesai< Consequentiy, AA.(W.)P.No.25^ Parties are entitled for certi- »i<if<i<fl-i*<i*«iT^te<A<Ri+iii< • ^^1^i3n^T counse! for the petjtioner is Just, fair and Itioner is atlowed to make a detailed ances cnd onnexing a copy of this writ respondent No.l, in turn, respondent No.l in 30 days fron! the date of its receipt in M'rth \as». If the petitionar is not aiready II the decision of ths representation. the petition stands disposed of. iS/2006 aiso stands disposed of. ied copy of this order. Sd<- L.C. Bhs.dQO Judge (^y^) <?