IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO.8808 OF 2004 Kalpana Prashant Gaikwad, .. Petitioner Vs Prashant Atmaram Gaikwad .. Respondent Ms Smita Deshpande, for the petitioner. Mr Sanjiv A Sawant, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 7th December, 2004. DATE : 7th December, 2004. DATE : 7th December, 2004. PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties for quite some time. Both the learned counsel fairly stated that the reasons need not be recorded for disposing of this petition and they agreed for the following order: (i) The respondent-husband shall pay Rs.2000/- P.M. instead of Rs.1500/- pm, as granted by the trial Court, each to the petitioner and her son Aditya. In so far as Rs.500/- per month which he has agreed to pay in excess to the order impugned in the present petition, the said sum shall be paid from the date of the order passed by the trial Court, i.e. 6.10.2004. (ii) The petitioner-wife agrees that she will invest Rs.500/- per month in the name of her son Aditya in a nationalised Bank or Scheduled Bank in which she will be shown as his Guardian. (iii) Parties are directed to co-operate for disposal of all the proceedings as per the directions given by this Court in Misc C.A.No.45/04. The trial Court shall decide the issue of maintenance uninfluenced by the orders passed at interlocutory stage. All contentions on merits are left open. 2. With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. 3. An authenticated copy of this order may be made available to the parties. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)