IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 8492 of 2009 Between: Ranbir Agarwal, S/o. Anil Kumar Agarwal, Hindu, R/o. Plot No. 92 and 93, P& T Colony, Karkhana, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by tis Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad, Office at Abids, Hyderabad. 3 The Statino House Officer, Karkhana Police Station, Karkhana, Secunderabad. 4 Omer Khan, S/o.Not Known, Karkhana Police Station, Secunderabad. 5 Mohd. Razaack, S/o.Not Known, R/o. Hasmatpet Village, Bowenpally, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not receiving the petitioner's complaint for taking action against the illegal and highhanded action of the 5th respondent demanding to pay party fund of Rs. 25,00,000/- and threatening the petitioner with dire consequences as illegal, arbitrary and high handed and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to receive the complaint from the petitioner and to take action against the 5th respondent Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.R.KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in not receiving the complaint of the petitioner and taking action against the 5th respondent, who is demanding the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.25,00,000/- towards the party fund. On the last occasion, when the matter is taken up, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home took time to obtain instructions and today it is reported that the complaint of the petitioner has been registered and, therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition. The said fact has not been denied by the petitioner. In view of the above, the writ petition is closed requiring no further orders. N.V.RAMANA,J Dt.1.5.2009 msv