(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 269 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 269 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO. 269 OF 2005 M/s. Govindram Brothers Pvt.Ltd. and another ...Petitioners Versus Satyanarayan Gupta & Anr. ...Respondents ..... Mr. Manoj Mhambrey, counsel for Petitioners Mr. M.M. Vashi, counsel for Respondent No.1. Mr. A.R. Bhor, counsel for Respondent No.2 ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 31ST JANUARY, 2005 DATED: 31ST JANUARY, 2005 DATED: 31ST JANUARY, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr. Mhambrey, the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. By the impugned order passed in Chamber Summons No. 1001 of 2004, an application for amendment has been allowed and the reasoning given by the trial court in para 9 to 11 does not suffer from any errors apparent on the face of record. In addition, the said order dated 22.12.2004 in no way affects the legal rights of the petitioners and therefore, no interference is called for in the same under Article 227 of the Constitution. 3. Hence, the petition is rejected summarily.