IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.2610 of 2008. Decided on: March 29, 2010 Nanak Chand ….. Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner : Nemo For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3 and 5. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate for respondent No.6. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.8. . --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the selection of respondent No.8 as Primary Assistant Teacher in Government Primary School, Khanu. The said respondent No.8 was the petitioner in CWP(T) No. 2609 of 2008. By our judgment today in the Writ Petition, we had directed the Pradhan to appoint the said petitioner ( respondent No.8) forthwith without prejudice to the liberty to the Panchayat or the Pradhan to pursue the grievance in appropriate proceedings before the appropriate Forum. In view of the above judgment, we dispose of this Writ Petition also making it clear that in case the petitioner is still interested in pursuing the matter, it is open to him to point out his grievance before the first 2 respondent – competent Authority in which case the matter will be duly considered by the competent Authority with notice to the affected parties. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 29, 2010 (Justice R.B. Misra), (rks) Judge.