1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Appln. (caf) No. 3093 of 2010 (In First Appeal NO. 101/08 [D]) V.I.D.C. ...Versus... Anusayabai Damodhar Meshram & anr. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. A.B. Patil Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. S.G. Loney Advocate for Respondent no.1. Mrs. Deshmukh, AGP, for Respondent no.2. --- CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 29.03.2011. This is an application seeking directions for refund of Rs.18,674/- According to the learned counsel for the applicant, the difference is due to difference in compensation of old Award and new Award after remand. In other words, the said amount is in excess of the amount under new Award. 2. According to Mr.Loney, under the new Award he is required to be paid the entire interest which may include this amount and therefore this application for refund cannot be considered. I do not agree. The respondents have to undertake the proceedings for execution of the new Award and also if there is less payment of interest, or as the 2 case may be. 3. Insofar as the present application is concerned, it relates to the amount under old Award already set aside by this Court and, therefore, the said amount which is in excess of the new Award will have to be refunded. Hence, Civil Application No. 3093/10 is allowed reserving liberty in favour of the respondents to take such steps as are permissible in law for execution. Judge /TA/