IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34898 of 2008 DINESHWARI DEVI @ BINDESHWARI DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner is an accused along with large number of other persons in Sono P.S. Case No. 45 of 2008 for offence under sections 17, 148, 149, 323, 337, 447, 307,120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently Section 302 had been added due to death of one Shobhan Yadav. Contention of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is that petitioner is in jail since 22.04.2008 and even as per the allegation in the F.I.R. she is supposed to have assaulted one Rabiya Devi with bricks and stones, but she had not played any specific role with regard to the assault on the deceased. The background to the dispute is a piece and parcel of land between the parties. In that view of the matter, the petitioner deserves some leniency in the matter. Complicity of the petitioner with crime as such is not the issue it is what is attributed upon her. Looking at the role she had played in the matter as well as the period she spent in custody, let the petitioner namely, Dineshwari Devi @ Bindeshwari Devi, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two - 2 - sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 45 of 2008. Rajeev/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)