THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 507 OF 2008 Dated: 25.10.2010 Between: Matam Sharan Prasad ..... PETITIONER AND The Collector, Ranga Reddy District and others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 507 OF 2008 ORDER : The petitioner herein claims to be a resident of Belkatur Village, Tandur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. It is alleged that the respondent 6, who is his neighbour, had made illegal constructions by encroaching upon the Government land. It is also stated that in spite of several representations and complaints made, the respondents 1 to 5 failed to take any action to stop the illegal constructions being made by the respondent 6. Hence, the present writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 5 to take immediate steps for stopping the illegal constructions being made by the respondent 6. In response to the rule nisi ordered, the respondent 4 - Panchayat Secretary, Belkatur Gram Panchayat filed a counter affidavit denying the allegations made by the petitioner. It is stated that the respondent 6 was granted permission dated 13.07.2006 for making construction on the site in question. It is also stated that pursuant to the representation dated 30.11.2006, made by the respondent 6 alleging that respondent 6 was making illegal constructions by encroaching upon the Government land, a notice was issued to the respondent 6 and on 02.12.2006, the respondent 6 submitted his explanation denying the allegations and stating that he was granted permission dated 13.07.2006 to make the constructions. That apart, the Secretary of the Gram Panchayat visited the premises in question and it was found that there was no encroachment upon the Government land. Moreover the respondent 6 filed O.S.No.107 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, a temporary injunction was ordered by the civil Court in I.A.No.335 of 2006. The said suit is pending and the order of temporary injunction has been in operation. No reply affidavit has been filed by the petitioner disputing the stand taken by the respondent 4. Having regard to the contents of the counter affidavit, it is clear that the allegations made by the petitioner are unfounded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. ___________ Date: 25.10.2010 G. ROHINI, J Ivd