IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6985 of 2008 Bashishtha Pasi Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- 5 26.08.2011 The petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing the order dated 9.1.08 passed in Sessions Trial No. 50 of 2007 arising out of P.S.Case No. 80 of 2007 by the learned F.T.C- V Kamur, at Bhabua allowing the petition of the prosecution filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C on 02.01.08 issuing the summons to the petitioner to face trial for offence under Section 366 of the I.P.C. It appears from the impugned order that in course of trial, on filing the petition under Section 319 Cr.P.C by the prosecution on 02.01.08, after hearing both parties and perusing the evidence the learned F.T.C- V has summoned accused/petitioner for facing trial for offence under Section 366A I.P.C. It is detailed in the impugned order that witness P.W.2 and P.W.5 have stated about the complicity of the petitioner. As such there is no illegality and jurisdictional error in the impugned order for interference in inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed. Namita ( Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)