& IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF.CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) PETITIONER WRIT PETITION N0 .?:2r.?.<./2006 ^ .: SfNBtEBEWCH ;1? y/ .<:? ^"&J>^ .V- // ^y Sukharu S/o Late Shri Kuberaged about 57 years presentlywroking as permanent Gangman (P.W.D.) R/o Village - Bishnupali, Teh. Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) v ,.t? -^ ^SF'ONDENTS -nl<"~^rr ~ ^ .CP^ ®^ w VERSUS 1. StateofChhattisgarh through itsSecretary, PublicWorks Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Engineer-in-Chief, PublicWorks Department, Near'RajBhawan', Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Superintedning Engineer, PublicWorks Department, BilaspurDivision, Distt.Bilaspur(C.G.) ^%!.' ^^4. ExecutiveEngineer, ^ ^PublicWorksDepartment, ^ ^ftf^ Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) '^ ^. SubDivisional Officer, PublicWorks Department, Tahsil-Sarangarh, Distt-Raigarh (C.G.) >^" WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF TH^CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE QF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. ORANYOTHER DinEcnouQRnBDERJOJQQjJUSTICE IN THE MATTER -'S HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETmON N0. 2296-QF 2006 Petitioner Resiiondcats versus SuKharu State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Stui Samcer Behar, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachliawaha, Govenuncnt Advocate for the respondents/ State. ORAL ORDBR (4*»May, 2006) 1. Leamed counsel for the petitionersubuuts fhat the petitioner was employed as Gangman in fhe year 1978 in fhe ofiBce ofthe Public Works Departinent, Tahsfl Sarangarh, District Raigarh. It is not clear as to whether the petitioncr was appointed piirsuant to open invitation of the applications aad by selection ainongst the smularly situated peraons. 3. Accoriing to teamed counsel &r the petitioner, the petitioner has worked for more fhan 25 yeara ot scrvice. Learaed counsel for the petitioner fiulher submits that the Madhya Pradcsh Gaiigman Service Rule 1996 coine into force fmm. 1.1.1996 and as per Rule, the petitioner is entitled to regularization. 3. At this st^e, learaed counsel for the petitioner submits fhat thc petitioner inay be allowed to make a representation before the concemed authorities to coasider his case, in accordance with fhe provisions of law, to which leacaed counsel appearing for the rcspondents has no objection. +f^_ The petition is accotdingly disposed of wifh^above liberty to inatee a representation, ifany. No order as_to^costs^ Bablu Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge