IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.18155 of 2010 Date of Decision : October 06, 2010. Sanjeev Kumar and another .....Petitioners versus Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners have submitted a complaint-cum- representation against the selection of respondent No.5 for the allotment of Retail Outlet dealership at village Ranipur on Bilaspur-Ranjitpur Road, District Yamuna Nagar. The petitioners have in their representation asserted themselves to be more meritorious. Since no decision has been communicated to them on their complaint-cum-representation, that the petitioners have approached this Court. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners, however, without expressing any views on the allegations made by them and keeping in view the fact that the Oil Companies including the respondent- Corporation have their own in-house mechanism to enquire into such like C.W.P.No .18155 of 2010 2 complaints, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.3 & 4 to consider and dispose of the complaint-cum-representation submitted by the petitioners in accordance with their policy/scheme as early as possible and preferably within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Till then, status quo with regard to allotment of LOI shall be maintained. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. October 06, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE