s-60 * IN THE HIGH COT]RT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3080/2011 SANJAY KUMAR & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: 1\4r. Atul Kumar, Adv. with petitioners in person. VCTSUS STATE & ANR. ..... ResPondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for State. Mr. Ajay Rai, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER oh 15.09.20LL Crl.M.A. 10909/2011 Exemption allowed subject to just exception. CRL.M.C. 3080/2011 This iS a petition for quashing of FIR No. 48412004 under Sections 498N406134 IPC & Section 4 of D.P. Act registered at PS Sangam Vihar, New Delhi. The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Asha is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the page 1 of 3 T4 CRL.M.C. s080/2011 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified II settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. - 2liomplainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce on 30'h e,rgrrri, 2008. As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. I has already paid Rs. 1,70,000/- to her. She fuither states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 484/2004 under Sections 498N406134IPC & Section 4 of D.P. Act registered at PS Sangam Vihar, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. The Petitioners who are present in person state that the recovered articles lying in the possession of Police be also given to the complainant/ Respondent No.2. It is further directed that the articles lying in the Police CRL.M.C. 3080/2011 Page 2 of 3 , Station recovered pursuant to the present FIR be given to the Respondent No.2. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. SEPTEMBER l5,20ll 'ga' WWrrs- MUKTA GUPTA, J. page 3 of 3 'G!": I - ,NWN'K $r qre\^ CRL.M.C. 3080/2011