1 UNREPORTED IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.356 OF 1998. Waman Narayan Choudhari, Age 46 years, Occ.Business, R/o Taloda, Dist.Dhule. ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, 2. Sub-Divisional Officer, Sub-Division, Taloda, Dist.Dhule. 3. Tahsildar, Taloda, District Dhule. ... Respondents. ... Mr.A.R.Borulkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.K.B.Choudhari, Addl.Govt.Pleader for the State. ... CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 29.06.2010. ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S.V.Gangapurwala,J.) 1. The petitioner impugns the order dated 2 13.5.1992 passed by the Tahsildar, Taloda, cancelling the hawker's license of the petitioner for sale of kerosene. The petitioner had preferred an appeal which also came to be dismissed. 2. The license of the petitioner was cancelled on the ground that he was selling kerosene at higher rate. The authority relied on the panchanama. Bare perusal of the said panchanama would show that the panchas were called after the sale has already been effected and the same has not taken place in presence of panchas. There is no evidence to implicate the petitioner for the said alleged act. 3. Vide the order dated 22.1.1995, this Court has stayed the impugned order cancelling the license of the petitioner and the petitioner is continuing with the said license. The Respondent has not brought on record any complaints against the petitioner during this intervening period. 3 4. In light of the above, we allow the petition, set aside the impugned order and make Rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (B). There shall be no order as to costs. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (B.R.GAVAI,J.) asp/office/wp356998