IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 7831 of 2008 Decided on: 26.11.2010 Jai Dutt and others. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioners : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per contents of the reply in M.A. No. 1323 of 2002, the present petition will not survive. Consequently, the present writ petition is rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge November 26, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?