1 (Spl. - H.C.A.S. C.D., 78-e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA PANAJI – GOA APPELLATE SIDE LLETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 6 OF 2004. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Quorum appearances, Court's orders, or directions and Court's or Judge's Orders. Registrar's orders. Shri V. Menezes, Advocate for the Appellant. Shri C.V. Pawaskar with Shri S.D. Padiyar, Advocates for the Respondent No.1. Shri G. Sardessai, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & N.A. BRITTO, JJ. DATE : 28th September, 2004. P.C. After hearing this Letter Patent Appeal at length, it was found desirable that the appellant-Union and the Respondents/Companies arrive at an amicable settlement so that the pending Reference before the Industrial Tribunal (Reference No. IT/38/95) is also served in terms of such a settlement. 2 Accordingly, time was sought for negotiations and with the active assistance rendered by both the learned counsel, the parties have sorted out their differences and placed before us Consent Minutes of the Order. These are signed separately in respect of both the respondents- Companies i.e. M/s. Syngenta India Ltd. Goa and M/s. Ciba Speciality Chemicals. The Consent Minutes of the Order are marked as Annexures 'A” and 'B' respectively for identification. The Consent terms have been signed on behalf of the appellant-Union and the respective parties-Companies as well as their learned Advocates. We hereby dispose of this Letter Patent Appeal in terms o the said Consent Minutes of the Order and the parties will approach the Industrial Tribunal 3 and apply for an Award to be made in terms of the settlement dated 26.8.2000 and 30.9.2000 respectively subject to the modifications as set out in the Consent terms. Writ to be issued forthwith. Copy of the writ also be sent to the concerned Industrial Tribunal. B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. N.A. BRITTO, J. sl.