1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26/7/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.(MD)No.8285 of 2011 K.Kanagasabapathy ... Petitioner Vs The District Manager Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Mullipadi Thamaraipadi Post Dindigul District. ... Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to issue tender schedule as per the tender Notification in Na.Ka.No.239/2011/C.V.3 dated 7/7/2011 issued by the respondent for running of the bar to the petitioner. For petitioner ... Mr.C.Vakeeswaran For respondent ... Mr.S.Chandrasekar, Govt.Advocaote O R D E R It is the case of the petitioner that though, he made an application on 15/7/2011 with a demand draft drawn in favour of the District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, Mullipadi, Thamaraipadi Post, Dindigul District for issuance of a tender schedule, to participate in the tender for a bar attached to a TASMAC shop No.3368, the same has not been issued, which necessitated the petitioner to send a Lawyer's notice on 16/7/2011. In such circumstances, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition for a mandamus directing the respondent to issue tender schedule as per the tender Notification in Na.Ka.No.239/2011/C.V.3 dated 7/7/2011. 2. On this date of hearing, the learned Government Advocate representing TASMAC, submitted that in reply to the Lawyer's notice dated 16/7/2011 has been sent informing the petitioner that he could obtain the tender schedule on payment of Rs.525/- by Demand Draft in favour of the respondent. Therefore, he submitted that the respondent has discharged his duty and hence there is no case for a mandamus. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the relevant materials available on record. 4. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner is willing to remit a sum of Rs.525/- towards the cost of tender Notification and further submission of the learned counsel appearing for TASMAC that on such remittance, the tender schedule would be issued to the writ petitioner, a direction is issued to the District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation, Mullipadi, Thamaraipadi Post, Dindigul District to issue the tender schedule, forthwith, so as to enable the writ petitioner to take part in the tender. 5. The learned Government Advocate also fairly submitted that the decision of this Court would be communicated forthwith to issue necessary tender forms, for the bar attached to TASMAC shop No.3368, to the petitioner on receipt of necessary fee is also placed on record. 6. This writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The District Manager Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Mullipadi, Thamaraipadi Post, Dindigul District. +1cc to Mr.C.Vakeeswaran, Advocate Sr.No.24539 mvs ssk/26.07.2011 /3c-2p/- W.P.(MD) No. 8285 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/