IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14812 of 2011 RAM NATH RAI SON OF BISHUNDEO RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHAWARI DIH, P.S. MOTIPUR, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 07.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A supplementary affidavit containing the statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr. P.C. has been annexed. The case has been registered under Section 366(A) regarding the alleged taking away of Rinjhu Kumari by the petitioner and others. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has given altogether a different version of the occurrence and she has stated that how she travelled Jalandhar in the State of Punjab and returned at her home. It has also been submitted that even in her statement she has not alleged any sexual intercourse or any coercion. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released 2 on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, (West), Muzaffarpur in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 02 of 2011. Ibrar/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)