mi'stmii" *^-'1"'^ . ...-....- -^ 3 THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAT'FISGjSRH AT BILASPUE .^i"ir^^m»'»cN"»art(a^<ff^wx^iF*iw & .\$L CONTEMi?T EETITION N0. vv "| OF 2CG4 x«igi8 gsncl STIT3DNER .«• \. • ..'•".^•^ ls Smfc. Sukhni, Wlfe of late AJma ^..•''QOi'^ . aged about 71 years, Occupafcio' ?'^"^.- Hbusewife, Cgste : Uraon, resident of village ; Uraonpar. Sitapur, P.S, & Tghsil : Sita; District s Surguje ( C.Q. ) \6^.'-;V €%yK' ^••^^:.- ^.s0^'" ^ Q ^ ^_EJi_SJJ_s y /• SESP08DBS3S ^ CONTEMSNOR 1. ManoJ Kuinar Pingua, Collecfcor, Surg'uj a, Ambikapur, Dlsfct ; Surgujs ( C.G. ) ;' ^^ ,® 2. V.S. Paikara, Sub Divis-ion Officer ( Revenue ), Land Acquisitj-on Offj-cer, Sitapi Distfc s Surguja ( C.G. } ^'^^^^^^^^ CON3SMPT SETITION UNDER WTICLE 215 OF TKE CONSTITUTIOu OF INDXA RE;a3 KTTH SBCT3DN 12 OF TKE eONTEM?T OF COURT SCT. The petitioner named _ab£iv&-n>-"i- StiSSff II ^ 1: <i, HJGHCQURTQF JUDLCATU^E AT BiLASPUR: CHHATTISGARH Single Bench Hon'ble Shri H.L. Dattu, CJ. Petitioner Contempt Petition No.94 QFJ2004 Smt.Sukhni Vs. Respondents/Contemnors Manoj Kumar Pingua and Another. Preserit: None for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 28th February, 2007) When the matter was called out for hearing, none appeared nor any representation was made on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in the matter. Therefore, the petition is rejected for non-prosecution. Sd/- -- ChiefJustice ditlNl