IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39397 of 2009 1. Raja Ram Singh, son of Ram Uchit Singh, 2. Murari Singh, son of Ram Uchit Singh, both of village Nauma, PS Halsi, district Lakhisarai – petitioner. Vs. The State of Bihar. 2 17.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order, dated 18.3.2008 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in Lakhisarai Ps Case No. 243/2004. The police has submitted a final form on the ground that there was a dispute between the parties with respect to sale of a Bolero jeep which has resulted in filing of this case. The materials which have come against the petitioner is that he has been named by the victim in paragraph 71 of the case diary and in the statement under section 164 of the Cr.P.C. Referring to those two statements, the court has taken cognizance for the offences under section 364A of the Penal Code. This court is not inclined to interfere with the order of cognizance considering the aforesaid facts. However, it will always be open to the parties to enter into a compromise and settle the matter out side the court if it is true that the reason for filing the case is dispute over a Bolero jeep. This application is dismissed. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)