IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1019 of 2008 Veer Singh S/o Sri Raghuveer Singh ……..Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ……..Respondents Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parhiar, Brief Holder for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Ajay Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parhiar, Brief Holder for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent No.3. 2. After due consideration of the submission of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; averments made against the petitioner in the F.I.R.; the fact the F.I.R. prima-facie discloses cognizable offence; the fact that the petitioner was Incharge Accountant on the relevant time; the fact that the petitioner has misappropriated a sum of Rs.4,43,300/-by transferring the said amount from the bank to his own account; and the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find that the petitioner is entitled to get the reliefs claimed in the writ petition. 3. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed in limine. 4. I am refraining from commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial, which is yet to start. 5. Consequently, the CLMA No.8658 of 2008 also stands dismissed. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 19.12.2008 Shiv