CRR No.531 of 2011(O & M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRR No.531 of 2011(O & M) Date of decision : 13.7.2011 Amrik Singh ........Petitioner Vs. Bhupinder Singh @ Bhinder Singh and others .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present:- Mr.Nandan Jindal, Advocate, for the petitioner None for the respondents --- AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) : CRM No.12001 of 2011 Application is allowed. Delay of 39 days in filing the present revision is hereby condoned. CRR No.531 of 2011 Learned counsel contends that no delay would be caused if the application for examining additional witnesses is allowed as the case has been adjourned sine die. Respondent No.1 is the only relevant party insomuch as only the said respondent has been summoned to face trial on the complaint of the petitioner. Respondent No.1 has been served as is evident by order dated 8.4.2011. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contends that the complainant filed an application to summon Karnail Singh and concerned clerk from DTO Office, Ludhiana as witnesses so as to examine them in pre- charge evidence. Learned counsel further states that no further delay would CRR No.531 of 2011(O & M) -2- be caused as the case is still at pre-charge evidence before the trial Magistrate. In such circumstances, no prejudice would be caused. Rather by way of examining the witnesses sought to be summoned, all the facts would come on the record and will come to the aid of the trial Court to come to the right conclusion. I have considered the contention of the learned counsel. Considering the stage of the case, the petition is allowed. The petitioner would be given two opportunities to bring the additional evidence in pre- charge. The said opportunities be given at the convenience of the trial Magistrate. (AJAI LAMBA) JUDGE 13.7.2011 akm