IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.806 of 2011 (O&M) Smt.Kaushalya Devi & others Vs. State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.Amit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. After relying upon some of the judgments, counsel for the petitioners submits that besides other prayers he sought direction to the respondents to take action under Section 11 of the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975. So far, the petitioners have not made any representation to any police officer. The petitioners, if so advised, may at the first instance make a representation against the builder as envisaged under Section 11, referred to above. Appropriate action in accordance with law shall be taken on the representation, if and when made by the petitioners. In addition, appropriate action on the representation already made by the petitioners to the concerned authorities be taken in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of without going into the aspect of maintainability of writ petition against the private builder. February 23, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE