THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.6815 of 2008 ORDER: Respondents 4 and 5 constructed a pent house on a residential complex known as “Rakshith Residency” at Sainadhapuram, ECIL post, Hyderabad. The 3rd respondent is said to have purchased it. Since the pent house was constructed without specific permission, the 3rd respondent submitted an application for regularization in terms of G.O.Ms.No.901, dated 31.12.2007. The petitioner is a welfare association of the flat owners of that complex. They oppose the steps taken by the 3rd respondent. According to them, the pent house was constructed without any permission and that it is causing hardship to the residents. This writ petition is filed with a prayer to direct respondents 1 and 2 not to regularize pent house in favour of the 3rd respondent. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration, learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent and the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. The Government framed a scheme for regularization of unauthorized structures through Ordinance 15 of 2007. The categories of structures that can be regularized and the circumstances under which the benefit can be extended are mentioned therein. The 3rd respondent submitted an application seeking benefit thereunder. The question as to whether the application submitted by the 3rd respondent satisfies the parameters described under the ordinance needs to be verified. Though the ordinance or other relevant provisions do not provide for any issuance of notice to the affected parties, the petitioner association is certainly entitled to put forward its contentions before respondents 1 and 2, as and when the matter is taken up. Ultimately it is for the concerned authorities to pass appropriate orders. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that it shall be open to the petitioner to file objections/representation before respondents 1 and 2 vis- à-vis the application submitted by the 3rd respondent. The petitioner shall be heard whenever the application submitted by the 3rd respondent is taken up for hearing. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 30.10.2009 JSU THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.6815 of 2008 Date: 30.10.2009 JSU