IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7382 of 2010 DADAN CHAUDHARY, SON OF KASI CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 19/03/2010 Due to inadvertence, the counsel for the petitioner could not make correction of P.S. Case No. in prayer portion of the bail petition which should have been Arrah Mufasil P.S. Case No. 49 of 2008 in place of 49 2009. Let it be read as Arrah Mufasil P.S. Case No. 49 of 2008. In view of such the order dated 5.3.2010 is modified to that extent. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)