SSK/ 1 s.570.06 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 570 OF 2006 Pathan Samiullah Inayat Ali ....Plaintiff Versus Sunita Patil ....Defendant Mr Suresh Upadhyay, Advocate for the plaintiff. Mr. M. A. Chaudhary, Advocate for the defendant. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 09th AUGUST, 2011. P.C.: The plaintiff and defendant have amicably settled their dispute out of Court and filed consent terms. The constituted attorney of the plaintiff has given his thumb impression and it is attested by learned Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant has signed the consent terms. The consent terms are signed by learned counsel for the respective parties as well. The constituted attorney of the plaintiff and the defendant along with her son is present in the Court. Both, the constituted attorney of the plaintiff and the defendant admit the contents of the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked as Exhibit “X” for identification. The suit is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Decree be drawn up in terms of the consent terms. SSK/ 2 s.570.06 2. In view of the disposal of the suit, Notice of Motion No.616 of 2006 will not survive for consideration and the same is disposed of accordingly. (RANJIT MORE, J.)