B ..) c^^(^V- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR Writ Petition N0.4^^8 °> 12003 PETITIONER •- ,< ..^•y ^€-^ ^y .^y 'y' ^ RESPONDENTS \--.-^^ ^ J^ ^r^Y?' '€'^^^ IX.' ^- Jagdish Prasad Patel, Aged 56 years S/o Shri Chatur Singh Patel, Uper Division Teacher Middle School Jalgarh, Block and Tahsil ^^?\'>^^ District Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Departnient of Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer District ]V[ahasam.und (C.G.) 3. BlockEducation Officer Block and Tahsil Saraipali District Mahasamund (C.G.) \^' WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. L ' : XI-HC—78 ^T?^T ^T I^Tte ^l ^?l^?^RNr ;-\ ^' '^ 'TS[ •^i<4i<n^, ®Ti1^<i<o,[®idl'ylj,< ^^...^.:...^v..^:..1 *11NCTI ^^jeR""———"----""^-----^ 200_^ 3n^?T TR1^" (l??^^) ^iTW^lft^f ^^ 13.02.2004 Shri L.C. Das, counsel Shri Ranbir Singh, Govt| The petitioner has pre| 227 of the Constitution of Ir^dia being aggrieved by the order dated 29.03.2003 whereby the petit|oner^ services were suspeiided on the ground that the petitioner sta^lds convicted for the commission of the offence under Section 498-A ijead with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 & 4 of Magistrate First Class, Saraip^li. Leamed counsel for th submits that the petitioner representation to respondent allowed to niake a detailed il within 30 daysjroni today to No,2 after considering all tl: decide the representation wit] da-te of receipt of the same in Consequently M.W.P. disposed of. Ocrtificd oopy ao por ru <=r>i^t<n<^i ^M<sfl '^feT^ <P»1^1< ^^tfima^T [or the petitioner. I. Adv. for the State. ^rred this petition under Artlcle 226 & Dowry Prohibition Act by the Judicial petitioner submits that the pefitioner has not been convicted so fa|r and the case is still pending and the petitioner has been suspend^d on the wrong /ground. He further niav be allowed to niake a detailed ^o.2 to which learhed State cpunsel has no objection. Having heard the learijied counsel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circL|mstances of the case, the petitioner is ^presentation raising all his grievances |t'espondent No.2 and in turn respondent points raised by the petitioner shall un a period of another 30 days from the |an objective manner in accordance with the law. With the above directiojis the petition stands disposed of. ^t^^. sro.3744/03 8s I.A. No. 12,112/03 stand Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge '^