IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 17TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 26TH BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 27357 of 2010(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.C.RATHEESH, MUTHALAMCHIRA HOUSE, P.O.KONDAZHI SOUTH, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. BY G.P.SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO.27357 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of September, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner has submitted an application for grant of regular permit to a mini bus on the route Choolannur-Mayannur as ordinary service. The same was granted as per Ext.P1 subject to settlement of timings. He has submitted the proposed timings as per Ext.P2. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the receipt of Ext.P2, timings were not settled. It is to redress the said grievance that this Writ Petition has been filed. 2. Obviously, as per Ext.P1, the petitioner was granted regular permit in respect of a mini bus with seating capacity of 28, to ply on the aforesaid route, subject to settlement of timings. When the petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 proposed timings in the light of Ext.P1, the respondent is bound to consider the same and settle the timings in respect of the aforesaid permit. Therefore, this Writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to settle the timings taking into account Ext.P2 expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not W.P.(C) NO.27357/2010 2 made any observation with respect to the merits of the claim. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) spc W.P.(C) NO.27357/2010 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. JUDGMENT September, 2010