IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2058 of 2011 Date of Decision : February 03, 2011. Gurpreeet Kaur .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Ms.Jyoti Sareen, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) For the reasons already assigned in the order dated 2.2.2011 passed in C.W.P.No.1972 of 2011 (Manreet Kaur versus State of Punjab and others), I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned orders. However, in all fairness to the learned counsel for the petitioner she raises an additional ground that in the impugned order dated 7.1.2011 (Annexure P-8) there is an apparent error of fact with regard to the date of joining of respondent No.7 in as much as she was posted in the Complex School vide order dated 28.5.2010 only whereas she has been taken to have joined on 1.9.2008. In my considered view, the aforesaid error has no bearing on the issues involved in this writ petition. In any case, if there is any error C.W.P.No .2058 of 2011 2 apparent on record, the petitioner is at liberty to represent before respondent No.2 in this regard. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. Dasti. February 03, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE