IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 18146 of 2009 Date of Decision: 24.08.2011 Meenu Begam ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present : Mr. A.K.Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab for the respondents. **** SURYA KANT .J.(Oral) The petitioner seeks a direction for selection as E.T.T. Teacher in the Sports quota (female category) on the basis of 'C' Grade Certificate said to have been awarded to her. She possesses the qualification of M.A. B.Ed. also. The petitioner alleges that she has been discriminated as the candidates of similar grading in sports including Monica, Seema Rani and Gurmail Kaur have been selected against one or the other post but the petitioner has been denied similar treatment. The respondents, though, have not filed any reply/affidavit, nevertheless the above stated claim of the petitioner can be ascertained after verifying the relevant certificates and record. CWP No. 18146 of 2009 [2] The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the Director of Public Instructions, Elementary Education, Punjab to call for the records, verify the petitioner's assertion and thereafter decide her claim by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case it is found that the petitioner was entitled to be selected as E.T.T. Teacher as per merit in the sports quota, necessary orders in this regard be passed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Dasti. (SURYA KANT) 24.08.2011 JUDGE 'ravinder'