IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7995 of 2007 NIRANKAR KUMAR ARYA, Son of Late Rameshwar Arya, Resident of Village Sanjha Ghat, Police Station Mirganj, District Purnea . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Commissioner, Purnea Parmandal, Purnea. 3. The District Magistrate, Purnea. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dhamdaha, District Purnea. . Respondents. ----------- 6/ 06.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel submits that petitioner had a licence for running fair price shops bearing licence no. 12/95. The petitioner was asked to show cause as to why licence has not been cancelled. Allegation against the petitioner was that he distributed the licensed items in short and that too at a higher price. Pursuant to the show- cause, petitioner filed his reply. The licensing authority did not find show-cause to be satisfactory and thus, cancelled the licence of the petitioner vide order dated 18.12.2005 (Annexure 4). The appeal and revision too filed by the petitioner have been dismissed. The licensing authority has found that the petitioner did not issue cash memo and made interpolation in the distribution register. As all the three successive authorities have found that petitioner has committed the breach of conditions of licence, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned orders. The dismissal of this application would not come in the way of petitioner approaching the departmental Secretary for his grievances. In case, an application is - 2 - being filed, the same would be disposed of within a reasonable time. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)