1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.850 OF 2008 (MRS. SUPRIYA S. MANDLEKAR & ANR. Vs R.T.M. NAGPUR UNIVERSITY & OTH. ) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : D.D.SINHA & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : JULY 14, 2008. 1. Heard Shri C.S.Kaptan, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Shri B.G.Kulkarni, learned counsel for Nagpur University and Shri S.K. Mishra, learned counsel for respondent No.2 UGC. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is seeking direction to the University Grants Commission to decide the proposal dated 27.11.2007 for grant of relaxation from NET / SET for appointment of the petitioner No.1 as a Lecturer in Cosmetic Technology. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that so far as subject of Cosmetic Technology is concerned, for SET (State Eligibility 2 Test) nor NET (National Eligibility Test) the said subject is available. Hence, a proposal, submitted by Principal, Mahila Mahavidyalaya, was forwarded by respondent No.1 University to the University Grants Commission(respondent No.2) on 27.11.2007. However, till this date, the said proposal is not decided. Hence, the petitioner is seeking necessary direction. 3. In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with direction to the University Grants Commission to decide the said proposal on its own merits, according to law and procedure applicable in this regard, within six weeks from communication of this order, if not decided earlier. JUDGE JUDGE RR.