:x, ^ 'z'c'. janKi, w/o ynivram, agecl aDout au ;^s R./n yife']!: -5., i\.f \J ViJfc^iJ.C^-^' Z3^-i rf-Z /~\-f-»^i CL^i-Ul. Ct 2"-, 25. U v ir^ij.c Laxmmatii, S-i/o yi'ivaiiirataii, ageu /-. T^/-v-n, I- A_f\ Tr^-^i-.c, 13 //-* '\ 7i,~i~i^"^ 13-3/-1 •nr'/^ Cl.lJVjLi.l- T*-' V*^.CU.v7, lY^ "^? V JLI-LCLg'.-- ^- Ci.^^'^-'JL Cl. Laxman, y./o ynvainrataR agecl -.^. T3 /--* 'S^f1^,/~r^ T3Q/-1 26. Hirderani, S/o Rambagas, aged ^~l..~fl -1-t" .^e. O /^ 1«11. JCcuO, i\f <\J V ilia.3 n< '£l. 'iTiiva Bai, w/o yuKnsagar, aRea oT^/^-n^' Q c:» tr-ta^^G' T? /'-TS \7;-l1"/^i=> TiQ^~1rt^<3 CX^Ut.i-t- •^'v^ VCCU-0, l"i./0 ¥i.S.id.i-^. 1 £%-\.t.I-'iCi.. Respondent.s No. rTL/3 'l-. e? ^ F^. h Q^^ -"I -H C.G. 8s '£l are K/o r^.4 ^-t-^^4- _r\^ ^^-n -L^ i^* L^. "^-. 'L'-L^ L!-L % '2o. yts-te oi Ni.v.y Now .^5tste 01 /"^T-tTT-tlT+^ 'h, -'f^^'r^T'f~i-' i/l ii'^ Li-^i i ^^ll^^l-^^ uurg, uisTncL-iJUTg.^.LT. •O-.sSV^! D&irendra Mishra, J. onri Kaiesn Jain, Aclvocate, tor tue petitioner. Shri Rajendra Agrawal, Panel Lawver, for the State- Bv tms petition uncler Article '££lol tne Constitiition OT Inuia, tne petitioner nas impugnea the oruer aatecl i4-y-2UU7 passect &Y tne luul Acictitional uistrict Jucige, Uurg ot Annexiire P-l wnerei3V ttie application ot tne petitioner- detendant tor amendmg ttie wnttfin statement nas been reiectect. Leamect counsei tor the petitioner suDmits ttiat Dy ttie proposeci ajiienciQient, tne petitioner prayea tor amencting paragrapn. 13 ancl paragrapn 3U ot tne wnrten statement Dy deletmg some pomon. 'l'tie anienclment proposect cloes not ctiange tne natiire 01 tne surt. However, tlie leamecl court ^ ueiow reiectecl tne application witn EUI'oDservation tnax Tne amenctment proposea Dv tne cfetenclant woiilfi preiuaice ttie interest 01 me plalntm anu tue tact sougm to &e am.enaect was well within the knowledge of the defendant at the tiine of filmg ol tne wntten staleiaent. 'l'iie petitioner uy ttie proposecl amenclment lias pravect lor cleieting e pleaaing m tfae written statement wnere&'v' ne lias pieaueci tUal Uovt. laij.cl at village Kareli was altoneci to one Ktio&naram, tiie tatner ot ttie petitiORcr wnereas uy uie »t o proposed aiiiendiTient, a pieaclu'ig is souglit to &e incorporated tliat Kaiaram got tlie iarici allottecl ui liis nanie 'DV sn.owmg Tiunseu landi.ess. 'lTie aijove appucauon was tileci 'DY uie ctelenctant alter tlie plaintiC's case lias Sjeen closea anct even some oi tlie witnesses ot uie clcienaant nave ueen exainineu aunng rnai ana ttTe maixer is postect lor reGoramg lurtuer eviaence 01 uie cieienaants. Atter clue consiaeration ol uie auove lacts ancl aiso tnat the applicatlon tbr amendment was preferred. bv tue petitioner when the plain.t.iff's evidence has alreadv been closed and some clelenciai^t witnesses nave also Deen exainmecl, tnis (Aurt is ol me consiclerecl opinion tnat there is no illegalrty, inlinuity or lurisciictionai eiror commrttea Dy ttie 'lTial Court wnic.ti inav occasion tajlure ot lustice wan"anting intenerence &Y Uiis Court. m exercise 01 Turiscliction ijncier Article '^il ot me eonstitution 01 inctia. 'i'ne petition is clisniissea. ^.^^ ^y