IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.4435 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 14.9.2010 Darshan Singh and another ....Petitioners Versus Sukhdev Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.B.D.Sharma Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.S.K.Mahajan, Advocate for the respondents. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. There is no legal infirmity in the impugned order as the interest of the petitioners who wanted the alienation of the suit property to be stayed has been adequately safeguarded by the observations of the Supreme Court in Meharwal Khewaji Trust, Faridkot v. Baldev Dass 2004(4) RCR (Civil) 760. The property has still not been partitioned and therefore in the event of the respondents alienating the suit property the fact of litigation will be mentioned in the conveyance deed and further in the event of the decree the parties would obviously be bound by the same. Disposed of. 14.9.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss