WPSB No. 282 of 2009 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Mr. Niranjan Bhatt & Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocates, present for the petitioner. Mr. K.C. Tewari, Standing Counsel, present for the respondents No.1, 2 & 3. Heard. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 16.12.2009, passed by the Divisional Forest Officer, Tehri Forest Range, New Tehri, whereby respondent No.4 has been transferred and directed to take charge as In-charge Range Officer, Tehri. The impugned order appears to have been passed in public interest, as is apparent from the order challenged before us. The petitioner at present is working as In-charge Range Officer on which respondent No.4 has now been transferred. The order dated 17.11.2008 (copy Annexure–1 to the writ petition) by which petitioner Nathi Lal Dobhal is working as In-charge Range Officer itself shows that the petitioner was assigned said job on completely temporary basis till further arrangement is made. As such, it cannot be said that the petitioner’s any right is violated by the impugned order. The petitioner is not deprived of any service benefits by the impugned order nor stands transferred from Tehri. In the above circumstances, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order whereby respondent No.4 has been directed to work as In-charge Range Officer at Tehri. The writ petition is summarily dismissed with the observation that the petitioner may make a representation to the authorities concerned for redressal of his grievances. (Stay Application No. 11276 of 2009 also stands disposed of) (V.K.B., J.) (P.C.P., J.) 23.12.2009 NS