IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.931 of 2011 MANOJ PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.01.11. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 14.11.2009 in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149,302, 379 of the I. P. C. Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The F.I.R. was lodged against unknown with the allegation that the informant’s father was killed at the shop by several criminals. During investigation, on confession of this petitioner, the name of other accused persons sprang up and from their possession recovery of explosive substances and naxal literature were made. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no recovery has been made from possession of the petitioner. Moreover, the confession before the police has no evidenciary value. It is further submitted that other accused person Ashok Paswan from whom possession recovery was made, has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 35916 of 2010. It is 2 further submitted that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case registered under Section 302 of the I.P.C. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Munger, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 202 of 2010 arising out of Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 171 of 2008. Learned court below will verify that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case under Section 302 of the I.P.C. only then bail bond will be accepted. Learned court below is at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner fails to appear on three consecutive dates during trial. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)