CW 9662/09 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9662/09 Rameshwar Prasad Versus State Bank of India & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 17/08/2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. H.R. Kumawat, for petitioner *** Counsel submits that petitioner, who is presently working as Security Guard in the office of respondents, was getting lower pay scale in comparison to others who were appointed along with him and discrepancy basically arose while making their fixation from old to revised pay scale, of which reference has been made in Ann.3. This fact has been averred by him that one Shri Nanu Ram, who was fixed in the pay scale of Rs.3410/- in the old pay scale, has now been fixed in the revised pay scale of Rs.5100/-, whereas petitioner has been fixed in revised pay scale of Rs.4635/- and various representations were made and so also legal notice was served, but the same has not been given any heed. Without going into merits of the matter at this stage, this court directs the petitioner to make fresh representation giving complete details CW 9662/09 [2] about such employees who were appointed as Security Guard along with him and are presently being fixed in the higher pay scale in comparison to him. If such representation is made within one month, authorities of the Bank are directed to decide the same within three months, thereafter, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Decision whereof be communicated to the petitioner, who if feels aggrieved, will be free to avail remedy under law. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA9662CW09 17-8.doc