1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 5676 of 2007 (Vijay Panjabrao Deshmukh .vs. Z.P.Amravati & Ors.) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, JJ. DATE : January 17, 2008. Heard Mr. N.S.Badhe, Adv. for the Petitioner and Mr.D.M.Kale, Adv. for the Respondent No.1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ Petition is in respect of the order dt. 29.10.2007 passed by the Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Amravati whereby the petitioner is declared excess/surplus in the school on the basis of strength of the students shown on the roll of the Zilla Parishad School as on 30.9.2007. Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the Government Resolution dt. 30.1.1996 which is annexed as 'Annexure V' to the petition. It is contended that, in view of the said Government Resolution, particularly as per the clauses A.2.2 and A.2.5, the order passed by the respondent cannot be sustained in law. Counsel for the respondent no.1 brought to our notice another Government Resolution of the year 1980 in order to justify the impugned order. 2 Be that as it may, in the light of the above referred facts and circumstances, it will appropriate for the petitioner to make a representation in this regard to the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Amravati within a period of eight days. If such representation is made, we direct the respondent no.1 to decide the same on its own merits, according to law and procedure applicable in this regard within a period of three weeks thereafter. JUDGE JUDGE ssjj