IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42576 of 2010 CHANDAN PODDAR S/O LATE KRANTI PODDAR, R/O VILLAGE- SINGHAUL, P.S.-MUFFASIL, DISTRICT-BEGUSARAI. ………Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ………..Opposite Party. ----------- 02 18.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, who is in custody in Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 194 of 2010, for the offence under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that one of the co-accused having similar allegation has already been extended the privilege of bail by this Court on 23.07.2010 vide Criminal Miscellaneous No. 24933 of 2010. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, does not dispute that other co-accused almost on similar allegation has already been granted bail. Keeping in view of the fact that co-accused namely Uttam Paswan having similar allegation has been extended the privilege of bail, there is no reason to deny the prayer of bail to the petitioner. Let, the petitioner, namely, Chandan Poddar, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sri A.K. Pathak, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Begusarai, in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 194 of 2010, on the same terms and conditions which has been imposed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 24933 of 2010 (Uttam Paswan Vrs. State of Bihar) dated 23.07.2010. Safik ( Rakesh Kumar, J. )