THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO: 13613 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed challenging the proceedings of the first respondent in Memo No.S.E/O/VSP/AD/A1/D.No.1296/2010, dated 7.06.2010 transferring the petitioner from Yelamanchili rural under the control of ERO, Anakapalli to ERO Narisipatnam at Sl.No.7. According to the petitioner his transfer is contrary to the rules and guidelines issued by the APEPDC Limited in Memo No.HRD/ESTTT/T/F.936/10/D.No.383/10, dated 5.05.2010. Therefore, the same is liable to be set aside. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the guidelines, the employees, who complete three years period in the present post/those completing five years stay in the present station in the same cadre as on 30.06.2010, are to be transferred. The petitioner has completed six years of service and he is liable to be transferred. But the petitioner, who was already working in a agency area, has been again transferred to another agency area, contrary to the guidelines, which contemplates that all the transfers are to be made from 20% HRA stations to less than 20% HRA stations to the extent possible. Whereas the HRA drawn by the petitioner is 10% and again he was transferred to a place where he will get 10% HRA only. In fact, having worked for more than six years in 10% HRA station, he should have been considered for transfer to an area where 20% HRA being paid. In this regard, the learned counsel for the petitioner has made a detailed representation before the Superintendent Engineer (Operation Circle), APEPDC Limited, Visakhapatnam on 10.06.2010 and the same is pending consideration. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the respondents are directed to consider and dispose of the representation purported to have been submitted by the petitioner on 10.06.2010 and pass appropriate orders within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, if the petitioner has not already been relieved, the impugned order shall not be effected. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ (C.V. RAMULU, J.) 16th June, 2010 Note: Issue C.C. in 3 days. (B/o) Js.