IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 655 OF 2010 MR. RAJENDRA NAYAK ... Petitioner Versus MR. RAVINDRA NAYAK ... Respondent Mr. C. Mascarenhas, advocate for petitioner. Mr. C.A. Coutinho,advocate for respondent. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 19th November, 2010 P.C: Mr. Mascarenhas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that certain material facts which are relevant which shall dis-entitle the respondent from seeking interim mandatory injunction were not brought to the notice of the appellate court since they were not within the knowledge of the petitioner. He also states that he will file application for variation of the order dated 17/8/2010 passed by the District Judge, South Goa, Margao in M.C.A no.52 of 2009 within a period of two weeks. He further states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file such an application and the interim order granted by this Court be continued for a period of two weeks. He further states that all the contentions in the present petition be kept open. Mr. Coutinho, learned counsel appearing for the respondent has no objection except for continuing of interim order for a period of two weeks. In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn. The petitioner may avail of appropriate remedy before the lower appellate court. The interim order to continue for a period of two weeks and the same shall stand automatically vacated within a period of two weeks. All the contentions of the petitioner are kept open. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-