1 3.wp.118-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.118 OF 2011 Mr.Savio Dolphie Serrao. ..Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .......... Mr.Anand Mishra, Advocate i/b. Mr.A.M. Saraogi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.D.P. Adsule, A.P.P. for the State. .......... CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 24th JANUARY, 2011. P.C. 1. The grievance in this Petition is about failure to comply with the assurance given by the newly appointed Investigating Officer, as recorded in the order dated November 24, 2010. 2. However, going through the Petition, it is not possible to attribute any inaction to the Investigating Officer as such. On the other hand, we find merits in the submission made by the learned A.P.P. that after the order was passed on November 24,2010 the Investigating Officer proceeded to record supplementary statement and after further investigation applied Sections 395 & 397 of Indian Penal Code and also PPD 2 3.wp.118-11 arrested additional three accused persons in connection with the said offence. 3. In absence of material facts pleaded in the Petition about the specific inaction of the Investigating Officer, it is not possible to entertain the grievance of the Petitioner about any noncompliance by the Investigating Officer as such. This Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to take recourse to such other remedy as may be permissible in law at the appropriate stage. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)