1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5545 OF 2009 Tushar Narayan Patil .. PETITIONER VERSUS Devidas Kisan Chaudhary & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.P. Brahme, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.L. Choudhari, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 to 6. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 1st APRIL, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Challenge raised by the petitioner in this petition is in respect of rejection of his application tendered in pending suit seeking order of interim injunction. Order passed by the trial court refusing to grant injunction has been confirmed by the first appellate court while dealing with Misc. Civil Appeal no. 35/2008. 2 Considering the material placed on record, both the courts below have concurrently recorded finding against the petitioner / original plaintiff. 2 In this view of the matter, no interference is called for in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, in this petition. It is noted that Regular Civil Suit no.34/2007 presented by the petitioner / original plaintiff is pending for adjudication before the trial court. Considering the pendency of the suit since 2007, the ends of justice would meet if the trial court is directed to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible preferably by the end of December 2010. Petition stands rejected. 3 In view of dismissal of petition, pending civil application, if any, stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp5545.09.odt