IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 4429 of 2011 Date of decision: 25.7.2011 Avtar Singh … Petitioner versus Baldev Singh and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. V.K.Sandhir, Advocate, for the petitioner ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner is one of the defendants in the suit for specific performance in respect of agreement to sell dated 8.12.2003, titled Baldev Singh and others v. Avtar Singh and another. He is aggrieved against order dated 4.2.2011 passed by the Civil Judge(Sr. Division), Tarn Taran, by dint of which permission has been granted to the plaintiffs to produce certified copy of the attorney dated 3.12.2003. Hence, this revision. Heard. Counsel for the petitioner contends that earlier also, at the rebuttal stage, an application for additional evidence was moved for production of the said documents, which was declined vide order dated 22.9.2002 for which a revision was also filed which was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek their remedy to lead rebuttal evidence in accordance with law and now with the same plea, another application under Section 151, Code of Civil Procedure, has been allowed by the Court below without discussing the observations made by the Court previously when the application was dismissed and so as the revision by the High Court when the said revision was withdrawn. A bare perusal of the impugned order also shows that the previous orders has not been discussed in the impugned order. In this back-drop of the facts, the present revision petition is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the case is C.R. No. 4429 of 2011 -2- remanded to the Court concerned to pass a fresh order after hearing both the parties giving the back-ground of the case, in accordance with law, purely on merits without being influenced by any of the observations made hereinabove. July 25, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE