IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.95 OF 2009 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.95 OF 2009 LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.95 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4668 OF 2008 Bansilal Arjun Rathod .. Appellant V/s The Divisional Social Welfare Officer Pune Division, Pune & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Milind Deshmukh for the Appellant. Ms.M.P.Thakur, AGP for Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 4. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : J.N.PATEL & J.N.PATEL & J.N.PATEL & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. R.G.KETKAR, JJ. R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 2ND APRIL, 2009. DATE : 2ND APRIL, 2009. DATE : 2ND APRIL, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. We do not find any merit in the Appeal for the simple reason that the issue as to whether the Beggars Home where the Appellant was working as a caretaker is an Industry or not, is a legal issue and is purely a question of law. The issue of maintainability of the complaint has already been framed by the Labour Court and even the parties have already led their respective evidence and have also concluded their arguments. Therefore, the labour Court, the Industrial Court and the learned Single Judge are right in rejecting the application of the Appellant seeking an amendment. Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. (J.N.PATEL, J.) (J.N.PATEL, J.) (J.N.PATEL, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.)