IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.R.BANNURMATH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER TUESDAY, THE 18TH AUGUST 2009 / 27TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 8443 of 2009(A) ------------------------------ PETITIONER: -------------- CHAKKI, AGED 66, WIFE OF KANDAN, NEAR THRITHAMTHALI SIVA TEMPLE, SOUTH KONDAZHY POST,THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.P.BHASKARAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAZHAYANNUR, THRISSUR DIST. 2. RAMAN AGED 55, THEKKINKADU COLONY, SOUTH KONDAZHY POST, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DIST. 3. DASAN AGED 23 SON OF RAMAN, THEKKINKADU COLONY, SOUTH KONDAZHY POST THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DIST. 4. DEVAKY, AGED 47, WIFE OF RAMAN, THEKKINKADU COLONY, SOUTH KONDAZHI POST, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DIST. ADV. SRI.C.A.CHACKO FOR R2 TO 4 R1 - BY SR.GOVT.PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ALONG WITH C.O.C.NO.784/2009 ON 18/08/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN OS.116/2004 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, WADAKKANCHERRY EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN AS.227/2007 OF SUB COURT, THRISSUR. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DT. 10/3/2009 LODGED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF FIR NO. 294 DT. 12/6/2009 REGISTERED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. S.R. Bannurmath, C.J. & A. K. Basheer J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P (C)No. 8443 of 2009-A & Con.Case (C)No.784 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of August, 2009. Judgment Bannurmath, C.J: Though we had directed the District Legal Services Authority, Thrissur and Taluk Legal Service Committee, Thalappilly to visit the place, call the parties and make an attempt for a conciliated settlement, in view of the willingness expressed by both the parties the matter was referred to Lok Adalat and after prolonged discussions an award settling the matter has been passed. The learned District Legal Services Authority has sent a communication dated 14/8/2009 reporting settlement which is confirmed by both the counsel. In view of the settlement, the matter does not survive for further consideration. Hence the Contempt Petition stands closed. Similarly writ petition also does not survive for further consideration. S.R.Bannurmath, Chief Justice A.K. Basheer Judge an.