IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2009 / 17TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 19102 of 2009(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SARISHMA M., D/O.M.SIVADASAN, AGED 20 YEARS, RESIDING AT 'UTHRADAM', PURAYILPARAMBU, KODUPARAMBA, P.O.EDAKKAD, CALICUT-5. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAMKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY SC SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/07/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).19102/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 8th day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner is a student who appeared for the Final year B.Com Examination of the University of Calicut conducted in April 2009. Apparently dissatisfied with the marks obtained in one paper in the Final year B.Com Examination, she had applied for revaluation. She is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the Final year B.Com Degree Examination. The application for revaluation is pending before the respondents. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioner, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a W.P.(C).19102/2009 2 copy of this judgment provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs