IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1710 of 2008 OF MOTION NO.1710 of 2008 OF MOTION NO.1710 of 2008 in in in INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1216 of 2008 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1216 of 2008 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1216 of 2008 IN IN IN INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. TAX APPEAL NO. TAX APPEAL NO. OF OF OF 2008 2008 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax 18 .. Appellant Vs. M/s K.K.C. .. Respondent Mr.R.G.Bhat for Appellant Mr.Vishnu Madade for Respondent CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and A.V.Nirgude, A.V.Nirgude, A.V.Nirgude, JJ JJ JJ DATED DATED DATED : 11th June, 2008 : 11th June, 2008 : 11th June, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By this notice of motion, the appellant is seeking condonation of 213 delay caused in filing the appeal. 2. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of motion. It appears that though the last date for filing the appeal was 21.9.07 the appeal came to be filed belatedly on 21.4.08 i.e. almost a year later. . The main delay seems to have been occured for drafting the memo of appeal and since court fee stamps were not readily available. We are not at all satisfied with the reasons given for condonation of delay. No sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice of motion stands dismissed. 2 3. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1219 of 2008 also stands dismissed. {A.V.Nirgude, {A.V.Nirgude, {A.V.Nirgude, J) J) J) (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J) J) J)