IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-25460 of 2008 Date of Decision: December 04, 2008 Maninder @ Tinku … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND. Present : Mr. Jitender Kumar Kamboj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Manjari Nehru, DAG, Punjab. S.D. Anand, J. (Oral) The learned State counsel, under instructions from SI – Atma Singh, informs that the petitioner did not join investigation. A similar averment was made on behalf of the State on 06.11.2008 as well. In the fact thereof, the learned counsel for the petitioner had conceded the correctness of that averment and assured that the petitioner would join investigation on 07.11.2008. Again, the petitioner did not comply with the undertaking which had been given to this Court under instructions of the petitioner only. It is in the light of the persistent default on the part of the petitioner to join investigation that this Court had ordered the vacation of the interim Crl. Misc. No. 25460 of 2008 order dated 30.09.2008. Even thereafter, the petitioner did not join investigation. In the circumstances of the case, the anticipatory bail plea of the petitioner shall stand declined. December 04, 2008 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2