IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 07.07.2010 COCP No.239 of 2010 Smt. Gurmeet Kaur and another ...Petitioners Versus Anil Kumar Jain ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Amar Vivek, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate, for the respondent. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondent has undertaken to vacate the premises by 30.06.2010 and to hand over the vacant possession to the petitioners. The respondent has also agreed to pay damages for use and occupation of the demised premises. It is contended that the respondent has vacated the premises on 18.09.2009, but has not paid damages beyond June 2009 and also the electricity bills etc. Earlier miscellaneous application in contempt petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed as infructuous on 18.9.2009. Any grievance in respect of non-payment of damages after June 2009 should have been raised at that stage. The present petition is nothing, but an abuse of process of the Court. Consequently, the same is dismissed. Rule discharged. 07.07.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE