sss-sat I, •sM «, ^J!"' *"»'!iins^' i'f',^lss' 'iozj f~*f\rr\ [^yJE'l. V^l^UI^l S^r ^riClAi A.ll^ljrAJtXn ..^A .OAA.^/^i'»JTU..rf WMT PETITION No. 1000 l'i§i3%^tJiilt->- ist. •iiSi;:';;&s:i:%)E'l-f' ^•1 RESPONDENT8 1. Kumari Nisha Pandey daughter of Shri Kanhaiya Lal Patidey, aged about 26 yeara. 2. Kumari Sushma Pandey, daughter ofShri Kanhaiya Lai Pandey, aged about 28 years, Both ofthem are resident ofSeepat Road, Sarkanda, Talisil aiid Distt. Bilaspur, ClAattisgai-h. VERSUS 1. State of ChhattisgartL Througb Secretary, Departinent of School Education, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Dii'ector, Public Instmctioiis, Raipur CPifaattisgarh, Raipur. 3. Deputy Director, Educatioii, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4. State of Madhya Pi-adesli, Tht-ough Seei-etary, Department of School Education, Vallabh Biiawaii, Bhopa!, M.P. 5. Director, Public Instmctions, Gautam Nagar, Near CSietak Bridge, Bhopa}, M.P. 6. Commissioner, Public Instructions, Direetorate of Pubiic Instrtictioiis, Goutain Nagar, Near Chetak Bridge, BhopaL M.P. WRTT PETmON IJNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB; Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aj»nUiotri,J. None for the petitioners. Sliri M.P.S.Bliatia, Deputy Govemmant Advocate for the State respondent No. 1 to 3. ORALORDER (Passed on 18m day of June, 2008) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any reoresentation is made on behalf of the petitioners. The petitionera may aot be interested in the matter. In view offhe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. Sd/- Satish K.Agnjhotri Judge