1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.2082 OF 2003 Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd & Anr. .. Plaintiffs versus Rukshana Aziz Ladhani .. Defendant Mrs.S.I.Shah i/by S.I.Shah & Co for the plaintiffs. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 16th December 2009. P.C: . The suit is placed on board under caption of “Undefended suits for ex- parte decree”. 2. The plaintiffs (The Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd & Anr) and its accounts officer have filed the present suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 3,18,385/-. 3. According to the case of the plaintiffs, the defendant who is the subscriber of telephone connection of the 1st plaintiff failed and neglected to pay the telephone bills dated 15th October 1999, 15th February 2000 totally amounting to Rs.3,18,385/-. Though the defendant was called upon to pay the amount, he failed to pay amount and therefore telephone connection was disconnected. Thereafter, the present suit has been filed for recovery of the amount. 2 4. The plaintiffs have tendered on record affidavit of one Mr.S.A.Dubey on behalf of the 1st petitioner. The plaintiffs have also tendered on record the duplicate bills and the communication dated 14th December 2009 sent by the 2nd plaintiff to the advocate for the plaintiffs. It is stated in the sid communication that the sum of Rs.12,139/- was adjusted in the year 2007 and therefore the balance amount payable by the defendant is Rs.3,06,246/-. 5. There is no written statement filed by the defendant. The affidavit produced by the plaintiff as well as the documents prove the case of the plaintiff. 6. Hence, I pass the following order: : O R D E R : (a) The suit stands decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (e) with modification that the decretal amount will be Rs.3,06,246/- instead of Rs. 3,18,585/-. (b) The plaintiffs will be entitled to refund of Court fees as per the rules. (A.S.OKA,J)