1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION O. NO.913/2010 IN M.C.A. (REVIEW) ST. NO.12042/2010 United Commercial Bank Through the manager, Sitabuldi, Nagpur ...Versus... Shri Kamalnarayan Rushinarayan Trivedi and others --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri M.Y. Wadodkar, Adv. for applicant] [Shri M.L. Somalwar, Adv. for respondents] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 24.09.2010 Heard. For the reasons stated in the application and after hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, I am satisfied that good and sufficient reasons exist for condoning the delay. Hence, delay is condoned. Civil Application is allowed. Civil Application stands disposed of. MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) ST. NO.12042/2010 Heard. The learned Counsel for the review petitioner pointed out that there is error on the face of record which could be seen from the perusal of the judgment under review. 2 He then argued that the liability could not be vicarious as the same could be based on the fraud played by the concerned employee. I have considered all the grounds raised before me. I have already dealt with all the grounds in the judgment under review and find no merit in the present Misc. Civil Application. The same is, therefore, dismissed. Execution may not be undertaken for a period of four weeks from today. JUDGE SSW