1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2868 OF 2010. Dhananjaya Madhav Dalal -: versus :- Pandurang Ramaji Khatik and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JUNE 30, 2010. Heard Shri A.M. Ghare, learned counsel for petitioner and Shri Gaoli, learned Counsel for respondent no.1. This Court has already recorded relevant facts in its order dated 24.06.2010 while confining notice to respondent no.1. Parties have pointed out that the Appellate Court has resumed its sitting at Nagpur, but yesterday it did not consider the prayers in the appeal because of pendency of the Writ Petition. After some arguments, Shri Gaoli, learned counsel who appears for respondent no.1 [original disputant in Election Petition before the Cooperative Court], states that in order to expedite the disposal of the main dispute, he has no objection if, present petitioner only is permitted to lead his evidence. 2 In view of the fair offer and consent given by Shri Gaoli, learned counsel, it is not necessary for this Court to go into more details of the controversy. The order dated 25.05.2010 closing the matter for arguments and denying opportunity to petitioner to lead evidence is hereby quashed and set aside. Petitioner to lead his evidence before the Cooperative Court at Nagpur on 06.07.2010 by filing examination-in-chief. The original disputant shall thereafter examine him and Cooperative Court shall thereafter proceed further with the matter. Cooperative Court shall attempt to decide the dispute as early as possible and in accordance with the law. Rule accordingly. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.