IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 946 OF 2011 MOHAMMED SARWAR HAJI IBRAHIM VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioners : Shri Gulam Dastagir Shaikh APP for Respondents: Shri S.B.Pulkundwar ... CORAM : S. B. DESHMUKH & A.M. THIPSAY, JJ. Dated: December 21, 2011 ... P.C. :- 1. Heard respective counsel. 2. Learned APP, on instructions, states that in view of the registration of Crime No. 30 of 2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 467, 468, 471 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, Investigating officer has arrested all five accused persons. During the course of investigation, according to him, it was found that there was a conspiracy of the petitioner and his son in the crime in question. This statement is made by the learned APP based on written instructions received from the Police Officer concerned. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner denies alleged involvement of the petitioner and his son in the crime. However, on instructions, he seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to take appropriate action regarding the claim of the prosecution that the petitioner and his son are involved in the crime. 4. Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought by the petitioner. ( A.M. THIPSAY, J. ) ( S. B. DESHMUKH, J. ) ... akl