^ ^<< :):';;:^,:^.11^,^:''^^'' Petitionerg ...... ^ Smt. Voilet KumaK aaed 53 vears G/oRam$sh Kumar, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Gath.ula Tahsil and District Rajnandgaon Versus Respondents V\. The State Government of Chhattishgarh, _ Through the Secretary, o^....^^..ff^ School Education Department, t^-^'^Y-^''^.--' D-l<'s' Bhavarl- RaiPur (C-G-) >-""^ "\^ / 2. The District Edueation Officer, >'?•'" \.....-" Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ^'..^•-" •>»' Writ petition under articles 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of wrjt in the nature of MANDAIVIUS, ^' ' HIQH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH, BILA8PUR W.P. (St No. 6499 of 2007 PBTITIONBR KBSPONDBNTS Smt. Voilet Kumar, aged 53 years C/o Raoiesh Kumar, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Gathula Tahsil and District Rajnaadgaon Versus The State Govemxaent of Chhattisgarh, Through fhe Secrctaiy, School Education Departinent, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education OfBcer, Rajnaudgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITIONJJNDERARTJCLE 226 01PTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearaace: Stari Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Pradeep Siugh, Paael Lawyer for the State on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (31.10.2007) SUML KUMAR SINHA. J Heard on adinission. Leamed counsel for the petitioner subinits that the petitioner has passed B.T.I. examination on her own expenses, therefore, she is entitled to receive two advauce iacrements according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also submits that ia many identical inatters, fhe petitions have been aUowed iu tenns offhe order passed ia the case of Yctshwant Kunwr Bhetradweii Vs. SSunlclpat Corfforfcls.oiti flurg <wd wwther {2006 fXO 3SPJR-CQ 96}. He submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by fhe said judgment. This legal position is not disputed by fhe leamed couusel for fhe State. However, he submits fhat fhe order niay be passed ia terms of fhe said judgment, but it shaU be subjected to verification regarding petitioner's such qualification. Accordiagly, this writ petition is attowed iu terms of the order passed in case of Yashwant Kunwr Bharadwaj Vs. Munidpat W.P.(S)No. 6499/2007 Corporalion, Durg cmd another (Supra) subject to verification of the facts as to whether the petitioner had acquired B.T.I. Exammatiou CertiBcate on her own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999 aad further whefher she has been paid two advance increments orncrt. The petition staads finaUy disposed of. No prder as to costs. Sd/- Sunii KumarSinha Judge vatti .,