IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION No. 3525 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA ======================================================== 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? ------------------------------------------------------- KANA VASAN LAVADIA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR YS LAKHANI for Petitioner MR BY MANKAD APP for Respondent No. 1 ------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA Date of decision: 29/08/98 ORAL JUDGEMENT Rule. Mr. B.Y Mankad, learend APP for the State waives service of Rule. Looking to the urgency of the case, the application is heard today. 2. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case papers provided by the learned APP Shri Mankad. Parties do not press for reasoned order. 3. In the event of arrest of the petitioner in Crime Register No. I-0067/1998 registered at Adipur Police Station, he shall be released on bail in respect of the offence alleged against him in this application, on his executing a bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount, by the concerned Police Officer and on conditions that he shall; (a) make themselves available for interrogation by the Police Officer, whenever and wherever required; (b) not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threats or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police officer; (c) not to obstruct or hamper the police investigation and not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police; (d) at the time of execution of bond, furnish their address to the Investigating Officer and the Court and shall not change their residence till the final disposal of the case or till further orders; 4. It would be open to the Investigating Officer to file an application for remand, if he considers it proper and just, and the learned Magistrate would decide it on merits. 5. This order will hold good if the petitioner is arrrested at any time within 90 days from today. The order for release on bail will remain operative only for a period of ten days from the date of their arrest. Thereafter, it will be open to the petitioner to make a fresh application for being enlarged on bail in usual course which, when it comes before the competent Court, will be disposed of in accordance with law, having regard to all the attending facts and circumstances and the materails available at the relevant time, uninfluenced by the fact that anticipatory bail was granted. 6. Rule is made absolute. Direct service is permitted. *** Prakash*