I! 73U! HTGH COURT OF KAITATAKA AT BANGALOP D.TED TUIS TRE 8TH DAY OF JUNE 1998 BEFORE TRW HON’BLE MRJIJSTICE M,F,SALDANHA TOLiTOJ Narasirnha Bhandar, Ad about 58 years, 3/0 Muthu Bhandarthi, B/at Birthi, Salikeri, Varambally Village, Udupi Taluk Dist. ... Petitioner. (By Sri A.Ananda Shetty for Petr.) AND: 1. The State of Karnataka, by its oretary to Govt., RevenUe Dept., Vidhana Soudha, Bangalore. 2. The Land TrIbunal, Udupi by its 3ecretary, Udupi, Dj 3 t: Udupi. 3. B.Thimraatpa Bhandary, Major, AgriciIturIst, Varambally Vi1]age, Post Salikere, via Brabmavara, Udupl Ta)ij & Djt, Respondents. ,,, 2/— (By azt.!utaiatitha Kaaari, HCGP, for P-i & p2.) This Wit Petition med under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India with en affidavit praying to: Direct J to consider the application tiled by the petitioner under section aCe) of the KLR Act, ]961 dated 2-5-98 vide Ann.C and to elicit the said application as prayed for therein and etc. This ‘fit Petition coming on for preliminary hearing this day, the Court made the following: Q.IQLL The petitioner’ a learned Advocate states that an application has been filed before the tribunal on 2-5-GB seekfrg certain clarifications. The learned Advocate states that since there are some other civil proceedings, that it is necessary that the m ribtai should par order s on the application that has been filed before it as otherwise, the petitioner is likely to be rresudiced in the civil proceedings. It is open to the petitioner to point out these facts to the Tribunal and to request the Tribunal to dispose of the applic’tion expeditiously. 2. With these directions, the Writ Petition to COP? stand disposed of. 3d,’- Judge. AscISt*tt RWIF? mgi’ Ia” tiks btr(O.t.) .“ r.by. ‘At’’’