THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26352 of 2010 Dated 26th October, 2010 Between: Kantimuchhula Muttamma …Petitioner And The District Collector, Visakhapatnam and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri S. Prasada Rao Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue Counsel for respondent No.4: Smt.V. Preethi Reddy standing counsel for VUDA The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in acting on the petitioner’s representation and preventing certain third parties from obstructing the petitioner from constructing house on her plot bearing No.963 of in the new Dibbapalem Rehabilitation Colony, Yathapalem layout Pedagantyada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, as illegal and arbitrary. I have heard Sri S. Prasada Rao, the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. The petitioner claimed that she was allotted plot No.963 under resettlement and rehabilitation scheme pertaining to Gangavaram Port. The grievance of the petitioner is that when she started laying foundation for construction of a house, certain antisocial elements have started interfering with the said construction by demanding huge sum. The petitioner is stated to have made representations to the official respondents to prevent the unlawful activity by those elements. On the ground that no action has been taken thereon, the present writ petition is filed for the above noted relief. In my opinion, if anyone seeks to interfere with the exercise of petitioner’s right over the plot allotted to her, she is entitled to avail the common law remedy of civil suit. None of the official respondents, who are impleaded in the writ petition, are charged with the duty of interfering in a dispute between two private parties. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedies available to her in law. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.33659 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 26th October, 2010 GHN