1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CAO NO.569/2010 IN MCA ST. NO.494/2010 C.R.A. No. 138/2006 (Ramnarayanji Murlidharji Chandak & another VERSUS State of Maharashtra & another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Rahul D. Dharmadhikari, counsel for the applicants. Shri A.M. Deshpande, A.G.P. for the respondents. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : APRIL 30, 2010 . Heard. The learned Assistant Government Pleader strongly opposes the prayer made in the civil application. However, for the reasons stated in the civil application, the delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. The civil application is allowed and disposed of. M.C.A. ST. NO. 494/2010. Heard. The learned Assistant Government Pleader strongly opposes the prayer made in the miscellaneous civil application. However, for the reasons stated in the miscellaneous civil application, the prayer made in the miscellaneous civil application is granted and civil revision 2 application is restored to file subject to the payment of costs of Rupees Five Hundred in the High Court Bar Library, Nagpur within a period of one week. The miscellaneous civil application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. JUDGE APTE