IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 2933 of 2008. Decided on: 21st September, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Anish Kumar Gupta. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. D.R. Sood, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 3. : Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner had appeared in the screening test as per the reply filed by the respondent-State, however, he could not qualify the screening test. Since the petitioner has not qualified the screening test, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge 21st September, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?