IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38737 of 2009 1. PAPPU SINGH 2. TARKESHWAR SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3. 19.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Only for the reason that the petitioners are acknowledged to have the antecedents of two more cases under the Excise Act itself, this Court does not consider it proper to grant them the privilege of anticipatory bail in accusation under Section 47A of the Excise Act. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioners shall be considered by the court below on its own merits without being prejudiced by the present order. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)