CG) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI$GARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION ts INo. “b1 £6 OF 2009 L”, Q {mi/f L r DI, WRIT BETITION‘UNDER ARTICLE—226 OF THE CONSTITUTION 7 ' or INDIA MAY THIS PLEASE TO YOUR LORDSHIP, PETITIONER R.K.Sharma S/o Shri Bharat Lal Sharma, aged about 49 years, occupation Service, posted as Assistant Soil Conservation Officer Durg, District Durg, C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of c.G. ’ through the Secretary Agriculture Department DKS Bhawan Raipur C.G. 2. The Director , Jal Grahan Khetra Vikas (Hariyali) Kalyakram, Vikas Ayukt Karyalaya, Vikas Bhawan,(Jal Grahan PrakoSht) Civil line Raipur C.G. 3. Deputy Director, Prakratik éansadhan, Prabandhan Sambhag, Agriculture and Co— oeerative Department, Agriculture Mantralaya Bharat Sarkar Shastri Bhawan New Delhi 4. .A.K. Sonwane , Sub Divisional / Agriculture Officer, Rajnandgaon CIG. , HIGH CGURT OF CHHA’E‘TESGAE‘E AT BELA.S?1§R S3 : H$WBLE Si‘IRX JUS’E‘EgE PRE’HNKER DIWAKER w.P.{sp N0. 316612009 EJETETEGNER R. k Shama RES?G§E§ENTS ‘State of {1G & Others WRIT PETITEG‘N UN§E§Q ARTECLE 226 OF THE CONSTETUTEON OF INDIA Apyearance: Shn‘ Rakcsh Pandey, counsel for tha petitioger. Shm' Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy.A.G. with Shn' Arvind Dubey, P.L. for the Staté. ORAL ORDER {06.07.2009} ChaHange in ths pmsent petition is to the order dated 29.6.2009 (Annexure P] 1) whereby the petitioner who is workmg on the post ofAssistant Soil Conservation Officer at Durg has been transferred as Assistant Direcior, Sugarcaoe, Kabirdham. x / Contention of 1earned counsel for the petitioner is tha he has undergone the special training for the Soil and Water conservation, commonly known as Hariyalf Project and one of the condition after completion of the training was that after completion of the same, the delinquent would work in the said project for.at least three years. He further submits that the petitioner has completed only one year but has been shifted. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submits that in the administrative exigency the petitioner t c 1 Q; can always be shifted and it is for the amployer to decide as to where the services ofthe petitioner is to be utilized. At this stage, leanmd counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to file a representation to respondent No.1 aild till his representation is decided, he may be ailowed to work in his present place of posting. He also submits that till today, the petitioner has not reh'eved. Considering the totality of the case, the petitioner is permitted to file a representation to the respondent No.1 Within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of this order, which shail be decided by the authorities concerned within a further period of three weeks from the date of its receipt. It is clarified that tiil then the petitioner shaii not. be relieved from the present place of posting, if not aiready reheved. With the above observation, the petition stands disposed of. i Sdl— Pritinker Diwaker Judge