IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 19TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 28TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 34368 of 2010(U) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. JOY ALOYSIUS, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.ALOYSIUS, ANNAI NIVAS, VADDY, KAIKULANGARA CHERRY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. JAMES ALOYSIUS, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.ALOYSIOUS, PANDAL VEEDU PURAYIDOM, VADDY, KAIKULANGARA CHERRY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. PRASANTHI, AGED 27 YEARS, W/O.JOY ALOYSIUS, ANNAI NIVAS, VADDY, KAIKULANGARA CHERRY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.BIPIN, SRI.N.SUNIL JOSEPH. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALLITHOTTAM POLICE STATION, PALLITHOTTAM(P.O) KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691 001. 2. ANIMON. E, RESIDING AT ST.ANTONY BHAVAN, KAIKULANGARA WEST, KACHERY.P.O, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691 013. 3. J. NORBERT @ ROBERT, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.JOHN, AGNES BHAVAN, MUNDAZHIKOM PURAYIDOM, KAIKULANGARA CHERRY, KACHERY (P.O), KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 013. 4. MARY XAVIER, LINO NIVAS, BHARANIYAZHAKAM ,KAIKULANGARA WEST, KACHERY (P.O), KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 013. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 001. R1 & R5 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.ALEX M.THOMBRA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs K.M.JOSEPH & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== W.P.(C) NO. 34368 OF 2010 ============================ Dated this the 19th day of November, 2010 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. The petitioners have approached this court complaining harassment by police. There is a reference of civil cases. It is also the case of the petitioners that they have obtained Ext.P5 permit to construct a building and they are being obstructed by the first respondent under the hands of respondents 2 to 4. 2. The learned Government Pleader would submit that on the basis of the complaint, Crime No.786 of 2010 of Pallithottam Police Station has been registered against petitioners 1 and 2 under Sections 294(b), 452, 354, 323 read with 34 IPC. It is stated that there was a commotion and the police intervened only in that regard. He would further submit that first respondent will not interfere with the civil dispute between the parties and that he will not interfere in the matter of petitioners carrying out construction lawfully in accordance with Ext.P5 permit. We record the same and close the writ petition and also Wpc 34368/2010 2 leave it open to the petitioners to challenge the registration of the crime, if so advised. K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE M.C. HARI RANI,JUDGE lgk