THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 7025 OF 2010 Dated 29th March, 2010 Between: V.Indira …Petitioner And The APSRTC and four others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri D.V.Chalapathi Rao Counsel for the respondents: Sri K.Madhava Reddy The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particular one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the lackadaisical and laissez- faire approach of the respondents in not implementing the joint survey report conducted by the 4th and 5th respondents to the route Meerpet- J.P.Colony-Dilsukhnagar (Route No.100) for the purposes of calculation and payment of hire charges payable to the petitioner for operation of the petitioner’s bus bearing Nos.AP29 TA 502 and AP 29 TA 501 as illegal, arbitrary, high-handed and against all settled principles of law and consequently direct respondents 1 to 5 herein to implement the joint survey report of the joint survey conducted by the 4th and 5th respondents to the route Meerpet- J.P.Colony-Dilsukhnagar (Route No.100) for measuring the operational distance for calculation and payment of hire charges to the petitioner for operation of the petitioner’s bus bearing No.AP29 TA 502 and AP 29 TA 501.” At the hearing, Sri D.V.Chalapathi Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition with corrected cause title and affidavit. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP No.9066 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 29th March, 2010 vrn