IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10938 of 2011 DINESH SAH, Son of Sukdeo Sah. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. Allegedly the petitioner took the informant’s son to Madras but till the date of filing of the case the informant’s son did not return. The contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that the informant’s son had gone in connection with his livelihood but he fled away from there and the informant has taken Rs.25,000/- from the petitioner and after taking the aforesaid amount she has lodged the present case. Considering the above stated facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Jadia P.S.Case No.30/2010. Nitesh ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)