1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 70 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITIO0N NO. 1797 OF 2008 I Ven Realty Limited & Anr. ..Petitioners versus Municipal Corporation for Gr. Mumbai & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Aspi Chinoy – Sr. Advocate with Mr. Janak Dwarkadas – Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankit Lohia i/b. I C Legal for Petitioners. Mr. R. S. Apte with Ms. F. H. Puranik for Respondents. CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD , J. DATED : 15TH JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents on the instructions of Mr. V. P. Prabhu, Assistant Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, who is present in Court, states that in terms of the Order passed by the Division Bench on 28th April, 2009, the Respondents shall issue an NOC within four weeks from today to the 1st Petitioner for development of Plot No.217, 217A of Worli Estate , Scheme No. 52 subject to the usual terms and conditions. The learned counsel further states that the Municipal Corporation has issued a notice to show 2 cause to the petitioners on 19th December, 2009. The Division Bench has clarified that the NOC to be issued pursuant to the Order may be withdrawn by Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 if law permits them to do so and all the contentions that were available to both the sides have been kept open to be raised, if necessary. 2. In view of the statement that has been made on behalf of the Respondents in order to comply with the Order of the Division Bench, the Contempt Petition is disposed of. (DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)