IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39891 of 2009 MANJU DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.6130 of 2010 1. SURAJ LOHAR 2. DHIRAJ LOHAR ---------------- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Complainant’s son is said to be kidnapped by petitioners. Section 365 IPC is added by now but kidnapped boy is traceless. Both the parties are expecting his death. Certified copy of petition filed by first wife of complainant’s son is there on record to show that presence of complainant was required in that case and a petition is given on behalf of complainant that he was dead but not killed by any one. Death certificate was also annexed with the petition and petitioner no.1 and 2 of Cr.Misc.No. 6130 of 2010 are only relation of first wife of the deceased and petitioner of Cr.Misc.No. 39891 of 2009 is mother of petitioners of Cr.Misc.No. 6130 of 2010. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of 2 arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Arun Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sheikhpura in Complaint Case No. 181 C of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)