IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.746 of 2008 Between: Dirajlal M. Shah and others ..... PETITIONER(S) AND G.S.Ashok and another .....RESPONDENT(S) HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.746 of 2008 ORDER: Admittedly, the present revision filed under Section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short – ‘the Act’), arises out of an order partly allowing the application purported to have been filed to receive documents as additional evidence, pending a regular appeal, under Rule 11 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Rules, 1961. Shorn of all the details and the facts and circumstances of the case and the respective claims put forth by the parties, it is well settled that in an appeal wherever an application comes forth to receive documents as additional evidence necessarily it has to be taken up and disposed of together with the appeal, rather than taking up independently. Unless and until the main appeal is heard it cannot be properly appreciated as to the relevancy or otherwise of the documents sought to be received as additional evidence in the appeal together. In view of the same, the revision petition is allowed and the order dated 18.01.2008 in I.A.No.159 of 2007 in R.A.No.320 of 2004 on the file of the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Court below for disposal of the main appeal itself along with the application in I.A.No.159 of 2007 on merits and in accordance with law. The Court below shall dispose of the appeal itself within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ____________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J 24th June, 2010 CVRK