H!GH'SOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA$PUR W, P, (S) No. 76$3 of 200? Petitioners 1. Revaram Naurange, S/o Budhuram Naurange, Aged about 4‘7 years, Assn. Teacher. Government Primary SchooL Gitkera. Biock-Paiari, Distt: Raipur (£16.) 2. Satruhan La! Verma. S/o BhagbaH Verma. Aged about 4'7 years. Government Plimary SchooL Risda. Block- Baloda Bazar! Distt.-Raipur (ca) 3. Pyareia! Verma. S/o Ramdin Verma, Aged 45 years, Asstt. Teacher, Government Primary School. Chhirahi. Block — Paiari. Disti. - Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. ' $mte of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director Public instruction Department, Ghhattisgarh Government, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, Eistt. — Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITIOI‘J UNDER ARTICLE 226 GF THE CéSTiTUTmN 3F iNDlA SB: Hon‘bie Shri 'Satish K, Agnihotri, J. Shri $anjay Patei, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer fer the respondents. ORAL CRDER (Passed on this 2““ day of January, 2008) 1. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner eubmits that the iseue invoived in the case is asto whether the petitioner is emitted to reguiar pay scaie w.e.f. the date of initiai appointment or from the date of completion of probation period? He submits that the issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribune . Jabainur in O.A.No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. state of MP. and others), wherein, it was held that the simiiariy Thakur gituated teacher‘s afe armed to regular pay scaie w.e.f. the date of inma! appointment. The matter had traveled ta Hon’b!e Supreme Court in Specie? {save Petitioé (CM!) No. $892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon‘bie Supreme Court. upholding the decision 0f the Tribunai to the effect that the Teaehei'siAseistant Teacheis are entitled to ieguiar pay scaie from the date ef initiai appeintment. Learned counsei for the petitioner further submits that this Court while censidering the same issue in Ram Kumar ahu and ethers Vs. State Govt. oi Chhattisgarh and another (WP.(S) No. 813 of 2007) by order ated 12.2.2007, has granted reeular pay scaie wet. the date at initial appeihtment. Learned ceunsei appearing for the parties ieintly submit that this ease is squarely covered by the decisiorr of this Ceurt in the case of Ram Kuinar Sahu and another (supra). in View of the abeve this petition is aliowed in the same terms. However, this order shaii he subject to ali verifications made by the State (M regarding facts pleaded in the petition. Sd/ i. Satish K. Agnihotri § Judge N g