1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 1 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 66 OF 2006 Lalita Ajay Khedkar ........Petitioner versus Ajay Ashok Khedkar ........Respondent. Mr. Hitesh Vyas adv. for the Petitioner. Mr. Sachin S. Punde adv. for the Respondent. CORAM: A.P. DESHPANDE AND SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATED : 6th May, 2010. P.C.: 1. This Review Petition is wholly misconceived in as much as the grounds raised in Review Petition are already dealt with and considered in the impugned judgment. No case is made for review. Hence Review Petition is dismissed. (A.P.DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J.) 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 139 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 66 OF 2006 Ajay Ashok Khedkar ........Applicant versus Lalita Ajay Khedkar ........Respondent. Mr. Sachin S. Punde adv. for the Petitioner. Mr. Hitesh Vyas adv. for the Respondent. CORAM: A.P. DESHPANDE AND SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATED : 6th May, 2010. P.C.: 1. The present application is moved by the applicant/appellant with a view to comply with the order dated 12-4-2010. It is submitted that the respondent/wife is not accepting the amount and hence the applicant be permitted to deposit the amount in the Family Court. In that view of the matter, we permit the applicant/appellant to deposit the sum of Rs. 3 lacs in the Family Court, Pune in compliance of the order dated 12-4-2010 passed in Appeal No. 66/06. The application is thus allowed and disposed of. (A.P.DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J.)