Civil Revision No. 1595 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1595 of 2010 Date of Decision: 9.5.2011 *** Satwant Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Prem Singh .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. Arun Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.K. Garg, Advocate for the respondent. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The suit of the respondent for recovery was decreed against the petitioner for a sum of Rs.16320/- along with 6% interest, vide judgment and decree dated 2.9.1996 and in execution of the aforesaid judgment and decree the Court below ordered the civil imprisonment of the petitioner on 12.11.2009 and for compliance of the said order, his warrants have been issued vide order dated 2.3.2010. Through the instant petition both the aforesaid orders have been challenged by the petitioner. Heard. On 15.3.2010 this Court while issuing notice of motion to the respondent-decree holder directed the petitioner-judgment debtor to deposit 50% of the decreetal amount within 15 days, on which condition his arrest was stayed. Consequently, the amount was deposited and vide order dated 21.12.2010 the amount deposited by the petitioner was ordered to be released in favour of the decree holder. Now the dispute has remained with regard to the balance 50% of the decreetal amount i.e. about Rs.18,000/-, the liability of which has not Civil Revision No. 1595 of 2010 2 been denied by the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that the petitioner is ready to pay the same in monthly installments of Rs.6000/- each. This proposition is not disputed by the other side. In view of this, in order to cut short the dispute between the parties and to satisfy the decree which was passed way back in the year 1996, it is directed that the petitioner shall pay the aforesaid amount in three monthly installments of Rs.6000/- each. The first installment shall be paid on or before 9.6.2011 and the entire payment will be made by 9.8.2011. In case the aforesaid directions are not complied with by the petitioner, the respondent will be at liberty to get the instant petition revived by filing an appropriate application in this regard. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the instant petition stands disposed of. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE May 09, 2011 Jiten