IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2009 / 2ND MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 22620 of 2008(P) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- O.P.IBRAHIMKUTTY, S/O.MOIDEENKUTTY HAJI ORIKKARAPARAMBIL HOUSE, POST TANALUR. MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRIC.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM. 2. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, TANUR BLOCK, MALAPPURAM. 3. TANALUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY POST TANALUR, MALAPPURAM. 4. A.ABDU, S/O.MOHAMMED, ADHIKUARATHU HOUSE, PAKARA TANALUR POST,, MALAPPURAM. ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR FOR R3 GOVT.PLEADER SMT.M.R.SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.22620/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: THE TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT SANCTIONING THE CONSTRUCTION OF KHURESSIPPARA- BEERANPADY PATHWAY IN TANALUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT DT 30.5.2008. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE DETAILED ESTIMATE AND ABSTRACT OF COST PREPARED BY ASST.ENGINEER, BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, TANUR DT NIL. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 8.7.2008. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DT 11.7.2008. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT 16.7.2008. EXTS.OF R3 EXT.R3(a): TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT OF LOCALR ESIDENTS TO THE PRESIDENT OF 3RD RESPONDENT PANCHAYAT. EXT.R3(b): TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.A 543/08 DT 15.7.2008 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.R3(c): TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.A3.4411/08 DT 24.7.2008 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 22620 OF 2008 (P) ==================== Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that a project for construction of Khureshippara- Beeranpaddy pathway within the 3rd respondent, was sponsored by Sri.A.Vijayaraghavan M.P, who has also sanctioned Rs.5,00,000/- for this purpose. In this writ petition, petitioner submits that the 2nd respondent should take necessary steps for executing the agreement to complete the aforesaid work as otherwise the fund will lapse. 2. From the instructions now the learned Government Pleader has, it would appear that regarding the election of the Convener of the Beneficiary Committee, there was a dispute and that is why there has not been any progress in the matter. 3. Now that there is a dispute regarding the election of the Convener, it is only appropriate that the 2nd respondent convenes a meeting of the Beneficiary Committee and gets a Convener elected and on that basis the agreement also can be executed. 4. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to convene the meeting of the Beneficiary Committee and ensure the election of a Convener, so that necessary steps to complete the WPC 22620/08 :2 : aforesaid work can be taken. Necessary steps in this direction shall be taken by the 2nd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 2 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp