IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 865 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: July 23 ,2009 Abdul Subhan .. Petitioner v. State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner. .. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 2.3.2009, passed by the learned court below, in an application filed by the complainant under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning Tahir as an additional accused. On an earlier occasion, a petition filed by the petitioner seeking summoning of the same accused in Criminal Revision No. 1773 of 2007, decided on 21.10.2008, this Court remitted the matter back to the learned court below for fresh consideration. After considering the same, the learned court below found that the material on record in the form of the statement of the complainant as on date was not sufficient to summon Tahir to stand trial as an additional accused. Except the statement of the complainant, there is no other material on record corroborating the same. Accordingly, I do not find that any case has been made out to summon Tahir at this stage. However, subsequently if some other independent evidence comes on record corroborating the version of the complainant, the petitioner would be at liberty to move a fresh application. The present petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge July 23, 2009 mk