1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.10474 and 10475 of 2011 P.Kamalam ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.10474 of 2011 V.Gomathi ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.10475 of 2011 Vs. 1. The District Collector, Trichy District. 2. The Thasildar, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District. 3. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Union Office, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District. 4. The President, Aaour Panchayat, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District. ... Respondents in both petitions. PRAYER: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to issue patta in respect of Survey No.382/9 to the extent of 3 cents of land and Survey No.382/10 to the extent of 3 cents of land in Aaour Village, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District and further more directing the fourth respondent to pay compensation to the petitioners. For Petitioner in both cases ... Mr.R.Rajaraman For Respondents in both cases ... Mr.M.Govindan Special Government Pleader for R.1 and R.2 ... Mr.D.Muruganandhan Additional Government Pleader for R.3 and R.4 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 COMMON ORDER These writ petition have been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the the second respondent to issue patta in respect of Survey No.382/9 to the extent of 3 cents of land and Survey No.382/10 to the extent of 3 cents of land in Aaour Village, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District and further more directing the fourth respondent to pay compensation to the petitioners. 2. Heard Mr.R.Rajaraman, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.D.Muruganandhan, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents 3 and 4. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. Though the writ petitions have been filed for two reliefs as stated above, the learned Counsel for the petitioners states that the grievance of the petitioners will be met, if a direction is issued to the second respondent/Tahsildar to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 27.05.2010. 5. In view of the above, the second respondent/Tahsildar is directed to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 27.05.2010, if it has not been already disposed of, on its own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the right of any third party will be affected, it is necessary that the authority should put such person on notice, so as to avoid the allegations of violation of principles of natural justice. It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's case and the authority shall consider the same on its own merits. 6. The Writ Petitions are disposed of as above. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To: 1. The District Collector, Trichy District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3 2. The Thasildar, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District. 3. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Union Office, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District. 4. The President, Aaour Panchayat, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District +Two ccs to Mr.R.Rajaraman, Advocate, SR.No.31696 ssl rl/7c – 26.9.2011 W.P.(MD)No.10474 and 10475 of 2011 15.09.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/