IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1565 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.8.2010 Ashiq Masih .....Petitioner Versus Satish Kumar ….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri N.K. Manchanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Hemant Gupta, J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioner is that in violation of the decree for permanent injunction, the respondent has demolished the property of the petitioner. Since the petitioner is relying upon a decree for permanent injunction granted in his favour by the Civil Court, the petitioner has a remedy to seek execution of the said decree from the Civil Court. In view of the said fact, I do not find that any case for initiation of contempt proceedings is made out. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. [HEMANT GUPTA ] JUDGE 11.8.2010 ds