IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6298 of 2009 1. BHUNESHWAR SINGH, SON OF LATE RAJ BAHADUR SINGH 2. RAJEEV KUMAR 3. RANJAN KUMAR 2, 3 ARE SONS OF BHUNESHWAR SINGH, ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE FATEHPUR, P.S. DIDARGANJ, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR----OPP. PARTY. ----------- 02. 21.07.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioner no.1 is the father and petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are his sons. They are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379, 506, 34 of the Penal Code. It is submitted on their behalf that the offences alleged except Section 379 are bailable but considering the long drawn litigation between the petitioners and the informant as would appear from Annexure-2 series petitioners should be admitted to the privilege of bail in the event of arrest. In this connection it is also pointed out that doctor, who submitted the injury report opined that the injury is simple in nature but dangerous to life. Such report according to learned counsel is wholly contradictory in nature and substance. Be that as it may, considering the long drawn litigation between the parties as is evident from Annexure-2 series, the above named petitioners are directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and be admitted to the privilege of bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Bikram, Rohtas in connection with Biramganj P.S. Case No. 96 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)