$-5 to7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 201/2011 REKHA 86 ORS. Petitioner Through: Mr. Harish Khanna, Adv. versus STATE Respondent Through: Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv. + BAIL APPLN. 223/2011 PREM 86 ANR Petitioner Through: Mr. Harish Khanna, Adv. versus STATE Respondent Through: Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv. + BAIL APPLN. 239/ 2011 SUNIL Petitioner Through: Mr. Harish Khanna, Adv. versus STATE Respondent Through: Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI ORDER % 12.07.2011 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 1. The petitioner /husband has settled all his matrimonial dispute with the complainant/wife before the Mediation Cell. In terms of the said settlement an amount of ^9,00,000/- has been paid apart from jewellery items weighing 134 grams. It has been further stated that the total amount of ?9,00,000/- has to be paid in a staggered manner at different stages and the parties are cooperating each other in obtaining the divorce by mutual consent. Mr. Pratap Singh, the learned counsel for the complainant has verified the contents of the settlement. It has been further stated by him that he has no objection, in case, all the petitioners are enlarged on bail. 2. Having regard to the facts of the case, all the petitioners in all the three cases, in the event of their arrest, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond for a sum of ^"10,000/- with one surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the lO/SHO concerned. 3. Both the parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the settlement. 4. The petitions are accordingly treated as disposed of. V.K. SHALI,J JULY 12,2011 KP