IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21814 of 2010 1. RAJU RAI @ RAJU RAI CHAUKIDAR @ RAJU RAM CHAUKIDAR SON OF LATE BINDU RAI 2. MANGAL RAI @ MANGAL RAI CHAUKIDAR SON OF LATE SADHU RAI BOTH RESIDENT OF KATIA, P.S. KADWA, DISTRICT- KATIHAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30.06.2010 Heard the parties. Petitioner earlier moved this Court for grant of anticipatory bail which was rejected as per the order dated 30th November, 2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 39913 of 2009. There is nothing in the application suggesting any apprehension of arrest of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that on his surrender the learned Court below should consider the application of the petitioner in the light of the order dated 18.03.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 889 of 2008. Considering the submissions of the parties, there is no ground to take difference view and as such I am not inclined to allow this application for anticipatory bail and the same is accordingly rejected. However, as observed earlier, in case petitioner on surrender makes an application for bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order in accordance with law. Manish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)