1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4941 OF 2008 Sayyed Mustaq Salauddin. ....Petitioner vs 1. The Pune Municipal Corporation & 14 ors. ....Respondents Mr. S.S. Kanetkar for the Petitioner. Mr. A.P. Kulkarni for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 5TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C. :- 1. By an order dated 30th August, 2008, the Petition was ordered to be heard finally at the admission stage. Hence Rule. 2. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally. 3. The Petitioner challenged the order of the Small Causes Court, Pune, refusing to exhibit a document in evidence. Mr. Kanetkar, 2 the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that subsequently the document has been exhibited during the course of trial while recording the evidence. In the circumstances, the Petitioner’s grievance stands redressed. 4. In fact, Respondent No.3 has challenged the order exhibiting the said document by filing Writ Petition No.9938 of 2009, which is pending in this court and is directed to be heard along with the present Writ Petition. The rights and contentions of the parties in Writ Petition No.9938 of 2009 are, obviously, kept open. The present Writ Petition is, however, disposed of as being infructuous in view of the document having been exhibited as aforesaid.