BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16661 of 2011 1 VELAMMAL 2 RAJAM @ RAJALAKSHMI 3 VALLI @ PUSHPAVALLI 4 SUNDARAMOORTHY 5 VELRAJ 6 NAGENDRAN 7 PANCHAVARNAM 8 MAREESWARI 9 KARTHEESWARI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 to 9 Vs THE STATE THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, VIRUDHUNAGAR. (CR.NO.38/2011) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.K.SUNDARAVEL Advocate For Respondent : M/S.R.RAMACHANDRAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 418, 420, 423, 465, 468 and 471 of IPC in Crime No.38 of 2011 and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have been arrayed as A.1 to A.9 in the said case. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case on the allegation that petitioners have fabricated a document in respect of the property belonging to Suresh Albert Singh and sold the property and the said transaction is said to have taken place in the year 2008. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners have been implicated in this case on the allegation that they sold the property belonging to one Suresh Albert Singh by fabricating the documents and the investigation is pending. 4. The fact remains that even as per the case of the prosecution the alleged transaction is said to have taken place in the year 2008. It is pertinent to note that the entire allegations are borne out by https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ records and documents, this Court is of the considered view that the custodial interrogation in respect of the petitioners are not required and this court is constrained to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Virudhunagar on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) with one surety each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police Officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners 1 to 6 shall appear before the respondent police for a period of six weeks daily at 5.30 p.m. and thereafter, they shall be available for interrogation as and when required. The petitioners 7 to 9 shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 20/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.2 VIRUDHUNAGAR 2 -do-thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, VIRUDHUNAGAR +1. CC to M/S.K.SUNDARAVEL Advocate SR.No.44766 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16661 of 2011 Date :20/12/2011 SMA/21.12.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/