2212lpa543.11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR L. P. A. NO. 543 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5142 OF 2011 Punjaram Bala Nikhade Vs. Bhulabai Kisan Bodhale ........................................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................................ Shri M. P. Khajanchi Adv for appellant. Shri Dastane Adv for respondent. CORAM: B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & P. D. KODE JJ. DATED: 22nd DECEMBER, 2011. Heard Shri Khachanji learned counsel for the petitioner- judgment debtor and Shri Dastane learned counsel for respondent- decree holder. After hearing respective counsel we find that there is no dispute between the parties that procedure as observed by this Court in its judgment reported in 2001(3) Maharashtra Law Journal 53, Annasaheb Rajaram Nagane and Another Vs. Rajaram Maruti Nagane and Others, particularly from paragraph 24 onwards needs to be completed to deliver the possession to decree holder 2212lpa543.11 2 within a period of three months as per law. If the petitioner- judgment debtor has any legal rights in the matter those legal rights are not in any way eclipsed by the order of executing Court or by the order of learned Single Judge. We, therefore, find that in view of this position no interference is warranted at this stage in the matter. Letters Patent Appeal is accordingly disposed of. No costs. Steno copy of the order be supplied to learned counsel for the parties. JUDGE JUDGE svk