C.W.P No. 2170 of 1987 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 2170 of 1987 Date of decision : December 06, 2010 Parkash Kaur and others, ...... Petitioners v. The Financial Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab and others, ...... Respondents *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.S.Gill, DAG Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3. None for the private respondents. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) Counsel for the petitioners states that despite having communicated with his clients, no instructions have been received as to who are the L.Rs of respondents No.5 and 6 or the fresh address of respondent No.11. I find that the relief has been jointly sought against respondents No.5 to 11. Since the petitioners have not served the L.Rs of respondents No.5, 6 and respondent No. 11, as mentioned above, this petition would C.W.P No. 2170 of 1987 ::2:: have to be dismissed qua them for want of prosecution and in case this course of action is adopted qua the said respondents, the same course of action would have to be adopted qua respondents No.7, 8, 9 and 10 because their alleged liability is joint with that of respondents No.5, 6 and 11. Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. However, if the petitioners come forward to show that they could not appear before this Court and ensure service of the unserved respondents due to circumstances beyond their control, they would be at liberty to pray for recall of this order. ( AJAY TEWARI ) December 06, 2010. JUDGE `kk'