IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46154 of 2008 1. Santosh Singh S/o Jai Nandan Singh 2. Birij BIhari Singh @ Brij Kishore Singh S/o Beni Singh 3. Dilip Singh S/o Raja Singh 4. Nirodhi Singh S/o Raja Singh 5. Ozi Singh S/o Ram Briksh Singh All are resident of village- Baghar, P.S. Noorsarai, District- Nalanda at Biharsharif. … Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Anil Singh S/o Sri Janak Singh, resident of village- Baghar, P.S. Noorsarai, District- Nalanda at Biharsharif. .. Opposite Parties ----------- 2 16.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 19.12.2006 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif for taking cognizance in Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 70 of 2006 under Sections 147, 149, 323, 337, 325, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation is that when the informant entered his village and reached near school he was chased by petitioners and 6-7 unknown persons, firing was shot which hit his palm. Submission is that no offence is made out as for the occurrence of same Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 69 of 2006 was lodged in which one from informant’s side was killed. There was no repetition of firing not there was any motive and for the incident another Complaint Case No. 415-C of 2006 is also filed. Filing to counter case earlier to this one is no ground for disbelieving incident for taking cognizance. A single bullet 2 injury is sufficient for killing needs no repetition. Subsequent filing of complaint also does not affect the merit of pendency of the first information report for purpose of inquiry or for trial. Motive is also given in the first information report i.e. about one day earlier quarrel in meeting of speed, so cognizance has rightly been taken in this case. I find no illegality in this order hence this quashing application is dismissed. Md. Ibrarul ( Mandhata Singh, J.)