.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2556 OF 2004 Mohd.Sami Hafiz ...Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents. .... Ms.Manjiri Shah i/b. Thakore Jariwala & Asso. for the Petitioner. Mr.R.M.Sawant, Govt.Pleader, for R.1 & 4. Mr.G.D.Utangale, Advocate for R.2. Mrs.A.K.Savla, Advocate for R.3. .... CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND F.I.REBELLO AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : JUNE 26, 2006. JUNE 26, 2006. JUNE 26, 2006. P.C.: . In terms of the survey conducted by Municipal authorities, the area in occupation of the petitioner is 140 sq.ft.. The petitioner relies upon the area statement shown in the survey done when the Rajiv Gandhi Niwara Project was to be implemented. That project was given up. 2. The order indicates that the petitioner was not able to show any documentary evidence that the area in possession was more than 140 Sq.ft.. This is purely a finding of fact. No interference is called for. Petition is dismissed. [F.I.REBELLO,J.] .[2]. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]