1 fa.397.03 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 397 OF 2003 M/s. G.T.Iron & Steels works. ... Appellants Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Board. ... Respondent ----- Mr. Vishal Kanade i/b M/s. Negandhi Shah and Himaatullah for the Appellants. Ms. A.R.S.Baxi for the Respondent. ----- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and A.A.SAYED, JJ. ( IN CHAMBER ) DATE : 23 rd September, 2010. P.C. After the judgment was pronounced, the learned counsel appearing for the Appellants prayed that the operation of the decree be kept in abeyance for a period of eight weeks so as to enable the Appellants to carry the matter before the Apex Court. In our opinion, the effect of dismissal of appeal is one of confirmation of money decree passed by the trial Court. The question of staying the execution of such decree does not arise. The Appellants have deposited only sum of Rs. 10,00,000/- in this Court. If the Appellants were to deposit the balance decretal amount, the request for staying the execution could have been 2 fa.397.03 considered. That is not the suggestion made by the Appellants. In the circumstances, prayer for stay as requested is rejected. [ A.A.SAYED, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]