IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA G. APP. (DB) No.11 of 2011 THE STATE OF BIHAR Versus 1. ANGAD SINGH SON OF LATE MARKANDEYSINGH 2. DHANANJAY SINGH SON OF LATE MARKANDEY SINGH 3. SACHINDA NAND SINGH SON OF LATE RAJDEO SINGH ALL R/O VILLAGE- LAKHAN CHANDPUR, P.S.- KARANDA, DISTRICT- GAZIPUR (U.P) 4. ANGAD DUEBY @ ANGAD MISHRA, SON OF LATE MANBODH DUBEY @ MANBODH MISHRA, R/O VILLAGE- KARANPURA (NANDAR), P.S.- KARANDA, DISTRICT- GAZIPUR 5. NATHUNI YADAV SON OF LATE PARSHURAM SINGH YADAV, R/O VILLAGE- SISAURA, P.S.-NANDGANJ, DISTRICT- GAJIPUR (U.P.) ----------- 3 22/04/2011 This Government Appeal is directed against the judgment dated 25.5.2010 passed in Sessions Trial No. 113 of 2008/31 of 2008 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. I, Kaimur (Bhabua) whereby respondent nos. 1 to 4 were acquitted from the charges under Sections 302, 149, 120B, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and convicted the respondent no. 5 only under Section 27 of the Arms Act and acquitted him from the charges under Sections 302, 149, 120B and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. We have perused the records including the judgment. The judgment has discussed the entire evidences in detail which has been brought on record by the prosecution. All the witnesses have been discussed in detail and they have described the manner of assault but the witnesses have not specifically attributed roles 2 against the respondents and on that basis the respondents were acquitted from the charges. We see no merit in this government appeal. It is accordingly, dismissed. In view of the fact that this appeal is dismissed on merit, hence I. A. No. 884 of 2011 which has been filed for condoning the delay is also dismissed. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) (Gopal Prasad, J.) avin