IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 36512 of 2009 Date of decision:17.2.2010 Gurjit Ram and another Petitioner vs. State of Punjab Respondent Present: Mr. Tejinder Pal Singh, Advocate. Mr. Arshvinder Singh, DAG, Pb M.M.S.BEDI,J. Petitioner No.1 Gurjit Ram has been attributed base ball bat blows on the person of complainant whereas petitioner No.2 Jagdish Ram has been attributed injuries with a lathi on the back of Kashmiri Lal. No doubt the grievous injury attracting offence u/s 326 IPC is attributed to Sandeep but petitioner No.1 being a member of an unlawful assembly, armed with a base ball bat, which has been used to cause the fracture of the legs of the complainant, petitioner No.1 cannot be granted the concession of pre-arrest bail. Petition qua petitioner No.1 Gurmit Ram is dismissed. However, the petition qua petitioner No.2 Jagdish Ram is allowed as prima facie no specific injury has been attributed to him. Jagdish Ram has also joined the investigation. Accordingly, the petition qua Petitioner No.2 Jagdish Ram is allowed and it is order that in case of arrest of petitioner No.2 Jagdish Ram, he will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the condition that he will join the investigation as and when required by the police and will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation. February 17 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE