HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH‘ BILASPUR Criminal Misc. Petigion No.135 of 2008 Suraj Kumar Sao, S/o Late Ram Prasad Sao, aged about 25 years, Pushpak Nagar, Shardakunj, Junwani Road, Police Station Supela, Bhilai, Durg (C.G.) PETITIONER: Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Home Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. The City Superintendent of Police, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. The Town Inspector, Civil Lines Police Station, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. {Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973} RESPONDENTS: ‘ x Present : Mr. T.K. Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ' ORAL ORDER (8-9—2009) .I..No.2/ZOO8, pplicion for taki documents on recor, is alowed. Documents taken on rcord. . T pitio und Secti 482 of e C.C. is for quashm of t F.R. regster a Police Station Civil Lines, Raipur uder ri o.4/2007 for th offence punishable under Sectio 1 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 198 (for short ‘the Act’). I ave herd learn cnsel for the parties and erused copy h . h a ed ou p of te F.I.., copy of seizre etc. . Learned counse fo t petitioner submits that investigation of the fce against te rier of the petitioner was pending befor the cpanant/respnden No.2 City Superintendent of lice, Raipur. Te titioner went to respondent No.2 in connecti with said offenc and at tha te, the petitioner was having money of Rs.4 a rt ben lodged by responnt No. t the instan of respondnt .2 t he petitioner has attempted to give bribe to respondent No.2 and Single Bench: Honble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J A aat ng d l are e his etn er on th r.P ent he .I ied t n Cme N2 e n 2 8 R u l r he ofen h dv e omliot Po h pe on the e t im lkhs. During the course of investigation, false repo has e de 3 a ce e No tha t 6&9 F.I.R. has been lodged against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence punishabie under Section 12 of the Act and the Police has illegally registered offence against him. “"W’m/t . Copy of the F.I.R. & copy of the seizure reveal that the petitioner has attempted to give bribe of Rs.4 lakhs to the public servant and he had put the money on the table of the public servant which has been seized from the public servant. At the instance of public servant, if the allegation made in the F.I.R. and other documents is admitted in its face value, same is sufficient for warranting conviction of the petitioner under Section 12 of the-Act. The prosecution has not concluded the investigation. In the light of the complaint/F.I.R. and seizure, I do not find any scope of interference in terms of Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.' Consequently, the petition is liable to be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed. . In view of this order, I.A.No.1/2008 stands disposed of.