1 APP572.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.572 OF 2010 In CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.602 OF 2005 Prakash@Appa Haribhau Londhe : Applicant (Orig.Complainant) V/s. 1. The State of Maharashtra 2. Gorakh Baban Kankate : Respondents .... Mr.K.S.Patil for the applicant. Mrs.A.S.Pai, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr.Rajendra Rathod for respondent no.2. .... CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 02, 2010. P.C.: Heard Mr.Patil for the applicant, Mrs.Pai, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr.Rathod for the respondent no.2. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant (original complainant) moved this Criminal Application for cancellation of the bail granted by 2 APP572.10 this Court to the respondent no.2-accused Gorakh Baban Kankate vide order dated 9.8.2006 on the ground that the accused has mis-used the liberty granted to him by committing the offences under sections 386, 343, 120-B and 452 of the I.P.C. It is further contended that the conduct of the accused Gorakh of committing the offences while on bail is the legitimate ground for cancellation of the bail since he has apparently mis- used the liberty granted to him. 3. The learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State has not disputed the fact that Crime No.65/2008 was registered against accused Gorakh for committing the above referred offences, however, the trial Court acquitted him of all the offences vide judgement and order dated 27.9.2010. 4. The learned counsel for the respondent no.2 Gorakh has submitted that the criminal case instituted against accused Gorakh was false and, therefore, he was acquitted by the trial Court. 5. Considered the contentions canvassed by the respective counsel. On the back-drop of the above referred facts, it is evident that though accused Gorakh, after release by this Court on bail, was involved in 3 APP572.10 criminal activities, the trial Court acquitted him. In these circumstances, it is difficult for us to hold at this stage that sufficient ground is made out by the applicant for cancellation of bail of accused Gorakh. In the circumstances, Criminal Application No.572 of 2010 is rejected. (D. D. SINHA, J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)