IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15132 of 2010 BASANT SINHA @ BASANT SINGH, son of Late Srilalji Singh, R/O Village-Bajidpur, P.O. Kalyanpur, Via Punpun, P.S. Pipra, District Patna. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Deputy Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Superintending Engineer, Minor Irrigation Circle, Mithapur, Patna. 6. The Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Patna. 7. The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Arrah. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 13.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the learned counsel appearing for the Accountant General. It is submitted that the petitioner retired from the post of Assistant Engineer (Estimating Officer) while working in the office of respondent no.7 on 31st of January, 1994. The petitioner is receiving the provisional pension. The G.P.F dues has also been paid. However, other dues have not been settled and paid as would appear from the communication of the Executive Engineer to the Superintending Engineer, as contained in Memo No.637 dated 7.9.2005 (Annexure 4). Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State as also Accountant General submit that the averments made in the writ application are not clear with regard to the claim of the petitioner. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the - 2 - petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Ara (respondent no.7), with a copy each to the respondents no.2, 5 and 6. In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the retrial dues of the petitioner may be settled. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)