IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.6230 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 29.10.2009 Nachhatar Singh … Petitioner Versus Hem Raj …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Raman Mohinder, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N.Jindal, J. (Oral) This petition is directed against the order dated 2.9.2009 (Annexure P-2) passed by learned Civil Judge (Sr.Divn.), Sangrur whereby the evidence of the petitioner has been closed by order. Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that due to non- supply of documents by the Court, he could not close the evidence but his evidence was closed by order. In these circumstances, this petition is disposed of with direction to the trial court to provide one opportunity to the petitioner to tender his documents. The District Judge would see as to why copies of the documents are not being supplied to him. This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondent with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expense, which may be incurred by the respondent as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dis-satisfied, the respondent may move this court for recalling this order [ A.N.Jindal ] Judge 29.10.2009 sd