IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12414 of 2010 SUSHIL SINGH SON OF BRIJ NANDAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.4.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. After the dead body of an unknown male was recovered, it was identified to be that of one Jitendra Ram and thereafter it transpired that the petitioner was at some point in time seen with the deceased before his death. It is submitted that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and apart from having been last seen at best with the deceased, there is no cogent material against the petitioner. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 10.1.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Chapra in Ekma P.S.case No.160 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if - 2 - he is he shall not be released on bail and (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )