IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 11638 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.P.SAFIYA W/O.ISMAIL, AGED 40 YEARS, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT ,CHELAMBRA S.V.A.U.P SCHOOL, P.O.PULLIPARAMBA 673 634 PARAPPANANGADI SUB DISTRICT,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION JAGATHY, TRIVANDRUM-14. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER PARAPPANANGADI 676 303,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. THE MANAGER CHELAMBRA S.V.A.U.P SCHOOL, P.O PULLIPARAMBA 673 634 PARAPPANANGADI SUB DISTRICT, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.T.MUHAMOOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 11638 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 6th day of April, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is an Upper Primary School Assistant in the 5th respondent's school. Her appointment is not being approved on account of a management dispute in the school. According to the petitioner, as per the several decisions of this Court, a management dispute cannot affect the validity of appointments made. Taking this contention, against orders in that regard, the petitioner has filed Ext. P7 revision petition before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P7 as expeditiously as possible. 2. Having heard the learned Government Pleader also, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P7 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the 5th respondent. The petitioner shall forward a copy of the writ petition along with a certified copy of this judgment to the 1st respondent for compliance. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.