IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1039 OF 200 APPLICATION No. 1039 OF 200 APPLICATION No. 1039 OF 2006 IN IN IN SECOND COND COND APPEAL No. 655 OF 199 APPEAL No. 655 OF 199 APPEAL No. 655 OF 1994 Shivajirao S. Sarkale & Ors. APPLICANT APPLICANT APPLICANTS Vs. Vs. Vs. Ganpat Ganpat Ganpat A. Shirke A. Shirke A. Shirke RESPONDENT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT Mr. R. S. Kate, Advocate for Applicant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 14, 2006. : JULY 14, 2006. : JULY 14, 2006. P.C. . Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Perused the Civil Application. By the present Civil Application Applicants seek to condone the delay caused in filing Civil Application and also to mention the legal heirs of deceased Applicant in the title clause. Applicants have made sufficient cause. There is no case of negligence or inaction on the part of Applicants. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, Application is made absolute in terms of prayer Clause (b) and (c). Amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]