- .fc<?.. c- ^ 'voO INTHEffltGHCQUKLQF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRITPETnVONNO. l ^3^ OF200S PEnTIONER : Yuvrg Sm^i S/.O Shd Shouki Lal, a^d about 35 years , resident of \fllage Dumarpaili, Taihsil and VERSUS ^ -/"¥. RESPONDENTS : ^ /^/ . h^a^ ..-•" ^\/>^7 .•••' <^'/ y.^n.y <sj\' y ^y^ '\ ^J"" ^ t^''^>>--<^"^1 '%,^h-g^S'''^/^ ''"^•S-K.^.^-S'^ ^. / ff~{\ fc o €^> o^ ^(1) State of a-ihattisg^rh, Arou^i Sub Eivisional Cfficer, Raigsrh, TAsil and Hsteict Raigarh (OG). ^(2) Ganpat Ram Saihu S/o zru Sahu, residait of \SU%e EXnnarpsii, TAsil md Ostrict Raigadi (CG). / (3)chhote C&s S/o ri Das , residait of ^ffll^ Dimiarpaii, Tdisil aad ES.strictRaig@rii(CG). ^(4)Kayat I^m S/o Gulsb, resident of ^Uage BaAar, Teteil and Distact Rai^A(CG). (5)Ranaesh S/o t known, residert of \yiage Banhar, Tefasil aad Distdct Rfflg9rh(CG). (6)Rqendra S/o Gulsib, residart of ^ \5U%e Banhar. Tefasil and Distdct RaigarhCCG). (7)Presiding Qfficer, Pollmg Boolh Dunaarpali ,Tehsil and Disteict Raigsdi(CG). WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA Sheet2 OiST"— XI-HC-78 iracwyiw ywi •«|<I|CT<I,UTflwid, RriWy't i\f'P- JXS& an^TwrR-ii* ?raT<)ii5<ia"iI«p vr %f; v4" Vrf&' 3ii^<i i3i<i> (^?fg<fs) W12006 /£^ s'wiaR'ulStf an^CT 09.03.2006 Shri Awadh Tripathi, Shri Utkarsh Verma, advauce copy. on admission. |counsel for fhe petitioner. '. Govt. Advocate for the State on learfaed ?^ w B-'@M( subiaission of tiBEtt-fif'*&a election petiti(| Panchyat Raj Adhiniyaml objection regardiug non-ji] specified officer Ulegally holding that thc persons necessaiy parties as they ^ their nomination in act submission m fhat the preltmiaarily stage, wifho^t under fhe Rute has fixed tt(( So far as the objectjic concerued, I do aot find teamed counsel for tUe circumstauces of fhis casd, Tnbunal. The petition caa^] This petitioa is sijn observed that the specifie^ petition ia accordauce wift^ >bject|ion adv IST ^itCTl'^F fei<fi <(Rl'PgR ftoil^ffl ;arued counsel for the petitioner is ta filed under Section 122 of C.G. 1993, the petitioner raised aa mider of aecessary party aud the [dismissed the aforesaid objection [denoted by the petitioner were not I'ere the persons who have withdrawn kirdance with rules. His furfher specified ofiBccr, thereafter, at the foUowing the procedure laid down case for final hearing. in relation to necessaiy party is force in the arguinents advauced by petitioner. In the facts and a right view has been taken. by the iftot be entertaiaed on this ground. 4Dimari]y dismissed. However, it is ofBcer shall dispose of the elcction the Rute prescribed for fhe same. Sin^a ^sslnha E " i