S1NGLEBENCH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. (& 3 / OF 2005 PETITIONER vs RESPONDENTS .^^-^ ^/^^ ^(S^v' o^ "A'Wt^"^'^''*' B.R. Potla, son of Late Rupa Potla, aged about 60 years, Assistant Grade-II, Tehsil Office, Jagadalpur, District Bastar. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Ministry of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 3. The Jagdalpur, Bastar. .-" Collector, District WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. I"' .-. XI-HC-22 ^ST^T {^ltoFW^T 5b^lcb<lRct 5h^l<^^ <5^[ ^l<<l<n<1, e>TH^41<o, fc)dW^< 3ll^lM5|c|» mwffgnte^f-^--^S)^4 iQD 00 •^9 f^s 3TI^T 5?<TTW ^cf Superint^ndent 2-5-2005 Mr. Mdnilal Sakat, ^Ar. Sudhir Agrawal, P.I^ Heard both the counsdl . The case o-f the petiti|3 24-5-1965 and thereafter ii| post of iAssistant CoIIector, Bastar Divison, duties from 12-9-1996. (Annexure-P/1) the then passed on order reverting (5rade-II without giving any[ preferred an q?ped (Anne| erstwhile State of M.P.. Stdte the petitioner was| transferred to the State o| again, approached the Ultimately, on 22-4-2003 petitioner to appear on 2^ requested for disposing of cour|sei for the petitioner. -. for the State/respondents No.l and 2. chixMld41Ti <-ii^^T^:fWt'<f^^i< ^3:rf^T3TI^T ri|?ner is that he was appointed as LD.C. on the year 1995 he was promoted to the and posted at the office of the J^xgdalpyr and he started discharging his iHowever, vide order dated 11-4-2000 ^ommissioner, Bastar Division/ Jagdalpur |the petitioner to the post of Assistant opportunity, against which the petitioner |<ure-P/2) before the Secretary of the \ on account of formdtion of the new informed that the appeal has been ChhattiS9arh. The petitioner, time and Secretary/ but nothing was heard. the Under Secretary caited ^Sn the ^4-2003. The. petitioner oypeared and the appeal. But the appea! is not being Ho^ever, Rev^nue XI-HC-22 3TI^T^T ^pfoF^n^r sti^icb^rfN' ^: Barve y ^ ^ ^^ 3^ ^Nl<rl^, ^Tfl^^^, fslcnwy 3ll^l45|ch <TWciTTaWTW """""""""'^[ 200 30 3TT^T 5^TW ^cT -A- disposed of and the petition^r attaining the age of superanr^uatio In the circumstancesj only 2 months' time is left, dispo^ of the appeal of respondents has no objectiorl. Having heard learned the facts and circumstoince|s iimited request made by le4r just and fair, as the appeal| respondent No.2 is directed| by the end of this month, in With the direction af4i In view of this orderj stand disposed of. Parties are entitled fdi chi^.T<n41Ti ^iH^iT^te^^^iK ^3Tf^"R'3T1^T is going to retire on 30 June 2005 on )H. counsel for the petitioner submitted 1+iat ipierefore, respondent No.2 be directed to the petitioner to which counsel for |counsel for the parties, having regard to s^ of the case and having considered the irned counsel for the petitioner which is of the petitioner is pending since 2000, |to dispose of the appeal of the petitioner xccordance with law. resaid, the petition stands disposed of. I.A. Nos.3276/2005 and 3277/2005 also r certified copy of this order. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge (^y^)