@ HIGH COLIRT SF SHHATTESGARH: BltASFUR Wi’it Petiiion {3} Na. 8Y89 ef 2937 Petitioners 1) Nand Kumar Nirma§ ace 53 years Asst‘t. Teacher glo‘ Laie $hr§ Ehhabiiai Nirrxnai P18 Nawagao; (K) Black & Disttl Bhamtar§ (CG). 2) Sumi Kumar Sao, age 47 year Astt. Teacher S10: §ate Shri Sahaniai Sao‘ P/S‘ Sankra biockiaistt Dhamtari (CG) Keiu Ram Nirmaikar. ave 46 year Astt. Teéc’ner S/o, Shri Sukh Ram Nirma§ Kar, PIS. Gagra Bmck‘i’Distt. Dhamtari (CG). a?) Manesh Kumar Mishra‘ age 44 years, Asst Teacher slc‘ Shré ie‘nwari Prasad Mishra, M/e. Gagra Block Distt, Dhamtari (CG) NEha: smgh Pate} aae 48 vear, Head Master Sm. Sim Qagwear PEaead Patei, pis $enchuwa BiocklDis‘tt‘ Dham’tari (CG), 6) Saniav Kumar Sahu aqe 47 year As€t Teacher 3/9. Shré Baisakhu Rem Sahu Giris P/s. Jhivéa Biock/‘Distt Dhamtari {06). 7) Nand Kishore Sa’nu age 42 year Astt Tean‘ner Sic. S‘mi Hzarkfiu Pam Sam We, Jhiria :alock/Dfstt. Dhamtari (CG). 3) Amari Ram Sam aqe 43 year Astt. Teacher $19, Shri Dhana}i Pam Sam» PJ’s. Kandei, Breckr‘Distt. Dhamtari {CG}. (£1 Q‘i U1 M/ “Smt. Shakunéara Sahu, age 44 year: Asti. Teacher, we Shri Mam?) La: Sahu, P/s. Kuhkuha Bfook Kurud Drstt. Dhamtari (CG). 10) Ramchand Dewangaan, age 46 years, Asti. Teacher Slo. Shri Shiv Ram Dewangan, P/s. Kurra Breck lDr’srL Dhamtari (CG). 11) Dhirendra Rae Pawar, Age 46 years, Astt. Teacher Slo. Shr‘z Sh‘svaji Rae Pawar, Pia. {30km Par Bbckii‘istt. Dhamtari. 12) San‘rosh Kumar Kumbnakar aae 46 year. Aet‘t. Teacher $19. Shri; tierha Ram Kumbhakar P/s. Sehradabré Bieck/ mart Dhamtari (CG). )3) Janardan Singh GajpaL age 5'1 year, Astt. Teacher, Sig. Shri Argun Singh Gajpag Pie. Dendki) Brocét/Distt. Dhamtari (CG). 44) Kemai Prasad Sahu age 50 year Ae‘rr‘. Teacher. Sic. Shri Rarrrdayai éahu, P/S. Bhethaké. Distt. Béack Dhamtaa (69);" wwW W ., w _ Z,’ 15) Rewa Ram Sahu; age 43 year, Asti. Teacher $10. Shri Eta Ram Sam, P/s‘ Biretera, BlocklDistt. Dhamtari (CG) ‘§6) Gajendra Kumar Sam, age 44 Asti Tgac'ner, S/o‘ Shri Bhukhan Lai Sahu P/s. Dhuma Bkmk Kumd, Dist: Dhamtari (CG) ”:73 Kamzeshwar Sinha, age 48 yeaf Asstt‘ Teacher sia‘ Late Nn'ne? Singh Qinha, WS, Amidih I Bisck MzagJarlod Distt‘v Dhamtari (CG). 18‘, Shri Ram Sahu aqe 45 years Asi‘t Teacher y SIC. Shri Brit} Laih-Sahu, Mis. Qevpur Bieok DEtt Dhamtari (CG). 1G) :swhar. Ram Sahu, aqe 49 years, Asii Teacher Biock/Distt. Dhamtari (CG). 20) Khiiaswan Dhruw, aqe 42 year" Ast‘r. Teacher) SJQ. Shri Team Ram Dhruw, Pls. Dewaai BTockfDistt. Dhamtari (CG). VersU$ Respondents 1) The Veeretarv Q State Department of Chhattisgar’n} of Schooi through Education, the D.K.s. Bea-wan; Raipur (CG). The Erector, Rubiic Education instrucxions Cinhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). [\J» 3) The CoTiector, Dhamtari (CG) 4) Assistant Commissioner Adiwasi Vikas, Adhim Jati Kaiyan Vibhag, Dhamtari (CG). 5) Disfr§ct Education Officer, District Education Dhamtari. o) Joint Director, Treasury Account and Pension Raipur {CG}. 7) The Director, Treasury Account ano‘ Pension Raipur (CG) (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india} SB: Hon’bie I‘v‘ir. $atish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Smt Renu Kocnar counsel for the petitioners 3hr; Aiay Dwivedr, Panei Lawyerror the state. oRAL oaeER (Passed on 23” January; gees; 'i) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as’tor the State/respondents jointiy submit that the fact and question or law involved in the present writ peiman are the same to ‘mat 0f in Yashwant Kumar gharadwaj Vs. Municipai Corporation, Dufg and armher {2006 (ii) MPJa - CG 98}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 3—4-2006r Learned counse! appearing for the respondents does not controver‘c the said submission. 2) m subsequent casee, Le, Wrii Petition (S) No. 4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma Vs. The Staie Govt. of Chhattisgarh and anorher) and other connected matters, decided by this Coun on 15—12—2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-14995, issued by the Secretary) Board of Secondary Education, Bhopai and the prospectus of Dioioma in Education Examination, it was ciarified that the nomenciature of the Basic Training institute Lew B.Tii., has been changed and renamed as Dipioma in Education, i.e., DEd Accordingiy, the DiEd. Certificate hoiders are aiso covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S) No. 4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verms Vs. The swte Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another (supra). 3} Accordingiyj the writ petition is aiiowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Gorporation, Durg and another (supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired DEd. Examination Certiticate on their own expenses as per the circuiars dated 24-124 998 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. ' sdi‘ . ' h g Raiu