The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.11287 of 2006 Dated 28th June, 2010 Between: S.Spandana Reddy and another …Petitioner And The Government of A.P., …Respondent Counsel for the petitioners : Ms.S.Anjali Agarwal for Mr.C.Kodandaram Counsel for the respondent: AGP for Higher Education The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside G.O.Ms.No.8, Higher Education (CE) Department, dated 04- 02-2006, issued by the respondent whereby Rule 3 (6) of the extant Rules was amended. At the hearing, Ms.Anjali Agarwal, learned Counsel representing Sri C.Kodandaram, learned Counsel for the petitioners, submitted that in view of expiry of four years from the time of filing of the Writ Petition, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication as far as the petitioners are concerned. The learned Counsel pleaded that the issue regarding the validity of the impugned Rule may be kept open for challenging in appropriate case in future. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.14039 of 2006, filed by the petitioners for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 28th June, 2010 lur