IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Review Application No. 849 of 2010 In Special Appeal No. 194 of 2009 State of Uttarakhand and others ….…… Appellants Versus Shambhu Datt ………. Respondent Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel (Govt. of Uttarakhand) for the review applicant. Mr. C.D. Bahuguna, Advocate for the non-applicant / respondents. Date of order: 30.11.2010 Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. In the review application, it is being contended that the decision of this Court dated 3rd December 2009 rendered in Special Appeal No. 122 of 2006 was in relation to a different category of employees than the respondent in Special Appeal No. 194 of 2009, disposed of by the order under review. That may be so, but the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the review applicant accepted the position that the said order dated 3rd December 2009 squarely covers Special Appeal No. 194 of 2009. 2. That being the situation, the logical conclusion would be that the learned counsel, who appeared before the Court in Special Appeal No. 194 of 2009, made a mistake in understanding the scope of the decision of this Court dated 3rd December 2009. Mistake of a Lawyer is no ground of review. 3. The review application, accordingly, fails and the same is dismissed. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 30.11.2010 30.11.2010 Amit