1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR M.C.A.NO. 747 OF 2010 IN W.P.NO. 3203 OF 2010. Shri Raju Bhima Madavi -: VERSUS :- Shri Tulshiram Punya Madavi and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : AUGUST 23, 2010. Heard Shri N.B. Bargat, learned Counsel for applicant. Contention of applicant/petitioner is under the scheme of Madhya Pradesh Bhudan Yadnya Act, 1953 there is no provision for challenging the lease granted by that Board. He points out that father of applicant/petitioner is purchaser and hence there could not have been any lease in the name of his father, and then lease of that land by the Bhudan Yadnya Board to respondent no.1. Learned Counsel contends that how half of the said land went to Bhudan Yadnya Board and how Bhudan 2 Yadnya Board has executed the lease deed, is not known. This Court has on 19.07.2010 noted that the remedy of filing Appeal under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Court is available to petitioner. With the assistance of Shri Bargat, learned Counsel for petitioner /applicant and learned A.G.P. for respondent no.2 to 4, I have perused the impugned order of Sub Divisional Officer. The Sub Divisional Officer has only carried out mutation. The order is under the provision of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Petitioner therefore, has got remedy of challenging that order by filing Appeal/Revision. No case is therefore, made out for review. Review application is therefore rejected. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.