IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 18737 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: August 27, 2010. Amro ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Haryana ...... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Amaninder Preet, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.M.Anand, Addl.A.G., Haryana. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in FIR No. 205 dated 04.10.2009, under Section 382 IPC, registered at Police Station Chandimandir, District Panchkula. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is a lady and has been continuing in custody since 29.04.2010. It is further contended that two of the co-accused, who are ladies, namely, Lacho @Laksman and Babli have already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 26.07.2010 passed in Crl.Misc.No.M-17065 of 2010. It is further CRM No.M-18737 of 2010 contended that trial is not likely to be concluded in near future as no witness has been examined so far. It is further contended that case is triable by Magistrate and hence, no purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody. Learned counsel for the State has not disputed these facts. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that she is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Amro, is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Panchkula. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) August 27, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2