IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP (T) No.8869 of 2008 Date of decision : June 3, 2011 Ganesh Dutt …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assitant Advocate General. Surjit Singh, Judge(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire selection process stands quashed, after an enquiry made by the Department, pursuant to a direction of this Court in another Writ Petition and that the Writ Petition filed against the quashing of selection process, has also been dismissed. Learned counsel, however, says that Letters Patent Appeal against the dismissal of the Writ Petition, challenging the quashing of selection process, has been filed. The present petition is disposed of with liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach the Court to become party to the Letters Patent Appeal. June 3, 2011(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?