:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO.858 OF 1999 NO.858 OF 1999 NO.858 OF 1999 IN IN IN NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.374 OF 1995 OF MOTION NO.374 OF 1995 OF MOTION NO.374 OF 1995 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.383 OF 1986. NO.383 OF 1986. NO.383 OF 1986. Mukund Vadilal Shah ...Appellant V/s Bank of India & Ors. ...Respondents ----- None for the Appellant. Sou.Swati Deshpande i/b.M.S.Bodhanwala & Co. for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 20TH MARCH, 2006. : 20TH MARCH, 2006. : 20TH MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Respondents. Since the suit itself has been transferred to the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Bombay, the above appeal has become infructuous. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)