upa 1 rp9-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 9 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1679 OF 2009 M/s Rebound Exports Pvt. Ltd. ).. Review Petitioner Versus Ladhaku Garments Mazdoor Sangh and others ).. Respondents Mr. V.P. Vaidya for the Revew Petitioner. Ms. Rita Joshi for Respondent No.1 (Original Petitioner) Mr. R.G. Hegde for Respondent No.4.. CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. AND J. H. BHATIA, J. FRIDAY, 10TH DECEMBER 2010 P. C. : Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents accept notice and waive service. By consent, Rule called out and heard. 2. The order dated 13th January 2010 proceeded on the basis that respondent No.2 admitted the matter in conciliation. However, the learned Counsel for the employer-review petitioner submits that respondent No.2 has not admitted the matter in conciliation and that the upa 2 rp9-10 report dated 16th September 2008 impugned in the writ petition of Ladhaku Garments Mazdoor Sangh was an administrative order not admitting the matter in conciliation. 3. In view of the above, we recall the order dated 13th January 2010. Writ Petition No. 1679 of 2009 shall be placed before the appropriate Bench. 4. All contentions are kept open. 5. Rule accordingly made absolute. CHIEF JUSTICE J. H. BHATIA, J.