HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.9476 of 2010 26th April 2010 Between: Pattanabhi Vruddhi Nivesana Stalamula Yajamanula Sankshema Sangam (Regd) rep. by its Secretary Gummadi Narayana Rao … PETITIONER(S) and Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Hyderabad and others … RESPONDENT(S) HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.9476 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner’s objection is to the construction of Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple in the plot earmarked as a Religious Center. It is their grievance that persons belonging to other denominations and faiths are also entitled to contend that a Religious Center, other than a temple for Lord Sri Venkateswara Swamy, should come up thereat. The grievance of the petitioner, if at all, is against the third respondent. Smt K.Aruna, learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent, would submit that a paper notification was issued calling for the objections in this regard; certain objections were received; and only thereafter was permission accorded to the third respondent to construct the temple. No statutory provision which requires individual notices to be given to each of the members of the petitioner society has been brought to the notice of this Court. The dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent with regards the nature of the religious institution to be established is a matter in the private law realm and is not a matter for examination by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Leaving it open to the petitioner, if they are so aggrieved, to avail other remedies, including by way of a civil suit before the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction, the Writ Petition fails and is, accordingly, dismissed. However, in the circumstances, without costs. _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J 26th April 2010 CVRK