IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0. ^&S^-J2006 PETITIONER : (NON APPLICANT No.51 ^y. ^)'^"!.--- b$%^-- >^p" ,f ,<KA'"-2_.P sf>' y ( Smt. Ambika Bai Jaiswal, W/o. Dubraj Kalar, aged about 50 years, Sarpanch of Village Panchayat; Village- Jashpur, R/o. village- Jashpur, Tahsil- Saranggarh, District-Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS (APPLICANT) v.^- '. 1»^1> cTfl® (NON APPUCANTSt 2 1. Smt. Noni Gauntin, W/o. Kirtan Chandranahu, (ex-Sarpanch of Village Panchayat; Village- Jashpur, but mentioned wrongly in the title part of impugned order as Sarpanch of the village panchayat village- Jashpur), R/o. Village- Jashpur, Tahsil- Saranggarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) Rambharos, S/o Sonauram Kahra, 3. Dhurwa, S/o. Nanki Sahu 4. Smt. Shanti Bai, W/o. Sunder Lal, 5. Gopal Prasad, S/o. Firat Ram, 6. Ganesh S/o. Dubraj Kalar, 7. Smt. Chamarin Bai, W/o. Ramnath, 8. Kalaram, S/o. Chaitu Marar, 9. Pyarelal, S/o. Shambhu Yadav, ^J^ I!v !'!.-•' st: > ^- (3) (AV (\4«l^l^A'>^ ',i.^JJ3. Hetrar&^S/o. Kartikram, o6.- 11. Sawa, S/o. Gopal Yadav, 12. Udal Singh, S/o. Ramji Yadav, 13. Smt. Rameshwari W/o. Anand Ram, 14. Smt. Ganeshi Bai, W/o. Kartik Ram, 15. Smt. Phuleshwari, W/o. Bhojram, 16. Phirtu, S/o. Khedu Marar, 17. Hetram S/o. Bouna Marar, 18. Kirtan S/o. Charan Das Chandra, 19. Amit Kumar, S/o. Gopal, 20. Smt. Uma Bai, W/o. Bhuneshwar, Non-applicant No. 2 Deputy Sarpanch & No. 3 to 20, All - Panchas of Village Panchayat; Village- Jashpur, All residents of village Jashpur Tahsil Saranggarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 21. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Panchayats, D.K. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) —^^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES (S2'?. OF THE CONSTITiTTION OFINDIA FOR ISSUANCEOF WRIT/WRITS. ^p;§^ ORDER/ORDERS.OR/AND DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS IN ^\ THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI/ MANDAMUS, OR OF ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE NATURE. •< •Oi r^f^i.3 'l! i!C ^'tt^d'i WVW Versus Smt. Ambika Bal Jaiswa! Smt. Nonl Gauntin & Other' 'RIT PETiTSON UNDER ARTiCLE 226 0= THE CONSTITUT'ON OF IND!A iSB : Hon'bte Mr, Satish K. Aanihotrl. J.1 n» •- Shri Shashank Thakur & Shri Manoj Jaiswai, Advocates for the Oer!t!0i''6!". Shri B.D Guru, Advocate forthe respondent No.1 ;cavsator. ! (Psssed on 11!" day of Novsmber, 2010} Lsarned counsel appearing for the petitioner suDmiis iha Witii ttie passage of time, the petitton hss become infructuous. Learned counsei aDoearina for other side does' noi controvert the above subm'ssion. 'n view of the abova. the writ pstition is dlsmissed, as havinu become !"fructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge