i', M ii wi: „\ 6^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S)No. '2,W> of 2010 PETITIONER Goverdhan Yadav, S/o Late Thanwar Yadav, Aged about 41 years, R/o Ward No. 5, Shitla Motipur, Rajnandgaon RESPONDENTS VERSUS /:1. ^2. x&^ ^s^ ^&y ..•••".K^o^" 3. .S!i«ss*SBBEi?fs -,.., 'i9?ftg.:':' State of Chhattisgarh, through its Controller, Government Regional Press, Rajnandgaon (C.G.). Deputy Controlter, Government Regional Press, Rajnandgaon (C.G.). Collector, Rajnandgaon, Distt: Rajnandgaon (C.G.). State of Madhya Pradesh, through its Controiler, Government Regicnal Press, 1(M.P.). ^.'*>, *t " & iS ?K ^- ^ p ^ WRIT PET1TION UNDER ART1CLE 226 OF THE 75T -^I^Krl^, 8>t)l'H*l<», fs«ni'M'4,< —.^.:!;.CS:.?.<^.i&>.;:>?/.w. ^^..........-.......................-.....^........ M 5ffl^I'Wf?aH? ;CT31T^I%tIW A' Tumane sn^i ira^' ('^{3^?) SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan 26-07^010 Shri Goutam Khetrapal, oounsjel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Ad advance copy. Heard on admission. Submission of learned couns^l fbr the petitioner is that the father of the petitioner died on 04-04-1997 grant of compassionate appointm brother. In the year 2000, option Wi appointment, but thereafter, no a( jvhereafter initially an application for |nt was made by the petitioner's |s taken from petitioner's brother for ttion was taken. Now, in place of petitioner's brother, it is the petition Taking into oonsideration th< petition, it would be appropriate to d| application submitted by the pet| appointment, in accordance with th^ with regard to the same within an ou{ of receipt of a copy of this orde[[ grievanoe of the petitioner still remai| to take recourse to such remedy a^ law. With the aforesaid direction, t! ^)i^<n<fhT ^R^f ^ fe^ <FSI^R ^affwan^l Shrivastava. J. ^ocate for the State/respondents on ^r, who has submitted an application for grant of compassionate appointnjient, on which, no decision has been taken. nature of grievance raised in this rect respondent No.2 to consider the poner for granf of compassionate applicable potioy and take deoision :er limit ofthree months from the date Needtess to emphasize, in case, n unredressed, he would be at liberty may be available to him under the e petitipn is finally disposed of. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge