1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6007 of 2011 Decided on: 4.8.2011 Pardeep Thakur ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another …Respondents The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, Advocate vice Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “That the appointment of the petitioner dated 5th June, 2010 may be considered as regular appointment for all intents and purposes and the petitioner may be held entitled for all consequential benefits as regular appointee w.e.f. 5th June, 2010.” 2. It is seen that the petitioner has already submitted a representation, Annexure P-5 and the same is pending before the first respondent. 2 3. There will be a direction to the first respondent/competent authority to look into the representation, Annexure P-5 and take appropriate action in accordance with law, within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alonwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the first respondent/competent authority. In case the petitioner requests for personal hearing, the same shall also be granted. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 04, 2011 (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.