IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2011 / 9TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 17713 of 2011(L) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- NIJIN.C, PEON, SGMSB SCHOOL, VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.K.MURALEEDHARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT – 673 101. 2. THE MANAGER, SGMSB SCHOOL, VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT– 673 101. 3. NEETHUSREE, C/O. HEADMASTER, SGMSB SCHOOL, VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT– 673 101. BY SRI. V. VIJULAL, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.17713/2011 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1 : COPY OF APPOINTMENT ORDER IN FORM 27 DTD. 3.2.09 AND the ORDER OF APPROVAL. EXT. P2 : COPY OF REQUEST DTD. 18.3.11 OF PETITIONER. EXT. P2(a) : COPY OF ORDER PASSED BY R1 DTD. 23.3.11. EXT. P3 : COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY the PETITIONER BEFORE R1 DTD. 10.6.11. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // P.A. to Judge. smp T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.17713 OF 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of June, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Peon working in the school managed by the 2nd respondent. It is pointed out that the petitioner is having the TTC qualification and he was promised to be granted an appointment from 01.06.2011 as Teacher. 2. The complaint raised now is that the 2nd respondent appointed the 3rd respondent in the existing vacancy from 02.06.2011 onwards. It is pointed out that the appointment has been granted ignoring the communication Ext.P2(a). Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has filed an objection as per Ext.P3 with regard to the approval of the new appointee namely, the 3rd respondent. There will be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the objection of the petitioner also which is reflected in Ext.P3 while the proposal for granting approval to the 3rd respondent is being processed. Appropriate decision will be taken within a W.P.(C) No.17713/2011 2 period of two months. The petitioner will forward a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp