CWP No. 4567 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 4567 of 2009 Date of Decision: March 23, 2009 Dinesh Kumar ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. R.K.Malik,Sr. Advocate with Mr.Yashdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. The only contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in the physical test the petitioner was entitled to 20 out of 20 marks and not 18 and that the appellate authority has not considered this factual aspect while passing order Annexure P-3 and has considered as if the petitioner has rightly been awarded 18 marks. I find that the order indeed reflects this. In the circumstances this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.3 to consider the factual aspect of the representation indicated above and pass a fresh order within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Needless to CWP No. 4567 of 2009 2 say in case the petitioner is found entitled to appointment he would be given all consequential benefits. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 23, 2009 sunita