THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.87 OF 2010 22th April 2010. Between: ENABOTHULA VANAMALA .. APPELLANT AND N.SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.87 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) Construction raised by the petitioner-respondent 1 herein being without permission, therefore writ petition which came to be disposed of permitting him to file an application under section 455-A of Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 with a further direction to consider the same in accordance with law. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Being alive to the fact that mandate of the impugned judgment casts an obligation upon the authorities to accord consideration to the application seeking regularization in accordance with law, it would mean that the objections, if any, filed shall have to be considered. Suffice it to say that in case respondent 1 files any application for regularization, the appellant shall have a right to respond through objections, if any, and if filed shall have to be considered on the touchstone of law governing the field. Disposed of. SANJAY KUMAR, J. NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, C.J. 22TH April, 2010. Nagesh Babu THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.87 of 2010 O R D E R: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) 22th April 2010.