IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3280 of 2010 1. GRISHNANDAN CHAUHAN S/O LATE KHIRU CHAUHAN R/O VILL YAMUNAPUR,P.O.PARIYAUNA,P.S.NOORSARAI,DISTT-NALANDA-------- -------------------------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY PATNA 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (CUM-COMMISSIONER) EDUCATION BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE NAWADA 4. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER NAWADA 5. THE PRAKHAND PRAMUKH NAWADA SADAR, NAWADA 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION NAWADA 7. RAM PRAVESH SHARMA BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, NAWADA SADAR, NAWADA----RESPONDENTS ----------- 4 18.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This is second visit of the petitioner to the High Court. Earlier his writ application was disposed of with a direction upon the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department to consider his case and adjudicate his right for salary. The speaking order is annexure-7 dated 4.2.2010. The Principal Secretary after giving a detailed personal hearing to the petitioner as well as his counsel as also perusal of the official records has recorded his findings in paragraphs 1 to 5. The findings being what they are and the materials being supplemental to the findings, a hand written so called roster produced by the petitioner in the rejoinder does not answer all the findings which have been given against the appointment of the petitioner on the post. There is a clear finding that the Block Development Officer manipulated the appointment of the petitioner on the post even though his name never figured in the panel of persons whose names were recommended, besides other infirmity as such. The findings being what they are the petitioner - 2 - has no case as prima facie the speaking order is based on evidence emerging from records. This writ application has no merit and it is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)