IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No.22166 of 2011 Date of decision November 30, 2011 Virender Singh Bamal and others ....... Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Hari Om Attri, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The petitioner complains of discrimination amongst the Bar members and cites resolutions framed by the Bar Association to be in appropriate. The Bar Association is not an instrumentality of the State, for the Court to make an interference. 2. The writ petition is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 30, 2011 archana