IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 3RD OCTOBER 2008 / 11TH ASWINA 1930 WP(C).No. 29258 of 2008(G) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ Y.GIRIDHAR KUMAR, S/O.RAMAIH GOWDA, 51 YEARS, YENAJI HOUSE, PERAJE VILLAGE, NERALAKKATTE PO., D.K.DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR.K.GOPAL RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM 3. STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TRIVANDRUM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SUDHADEVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.29258 of 2008 ------------------------- Dated this the 3rd October, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a registered owner of the stage carriage bearing registration No.KA 19/C 3788 which is stated to be covered with a regular interstate permit on the route 1. Odiyur-Mugli-Uppala, 2. Uppala-Mugli- Kanayana-Vittal, 3. Vittal-Saradka - Perla-Kumbala and 4. Uppala-Mugli-Odiyur. According to the petitioner, interstate permit is being issued subject to the payment of tax to the Government of Karnataka as well as the Government of Kerala. But the permit is not included in the interstate agreement in question when he had come up for renewal. Petitioner submits that if the permit is included in the interstate agreement between the State of Karnataka and State of Kerala, then he would be in a position to continue to operate the vehicle on the interstate permit. A similar matter has been considered by this Court in Ext.P3 judgment. Representations filed W.P ( C) No.29258 of 2008 2 by the petitioner before the Government as Exts.P1 and P2 are pending consideration. 2. I heard learned Government Pleader also. 3. In the result, writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider Exts.P1 and P2 and take a decision thereon, as expeditiously as possible. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.29258 of 2008 3 W.P ( C) No.29258 of 2008 4 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 3rd October, 2008 J U D G M E N T (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.29258 of 2008 5 W.P ( C) No.29258 of 2008 6