IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2008 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1930 W.P.(C).No. 8701 of 2008(J) --------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- AHAMED SHIAD A., S/O. ARACKAL ALI, AGED 25 YEARS, ARACKAL HOUSE, VADAKKEKAD POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.E.R.VENKATESWARAN SRI.R.SREEHARI RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, UNIVERSITY POST-673 635, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY POST, PIN-673 635. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, M.E.S. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, KUTTIPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN, SC FOR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 8701 OF 2008 J ==================== Dated this the 8th day of April, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner was an Engineering Student and this writ petition concerns the 7th semester examination. 2. Two reliefs are sought for. One is to direct the University to declare the result of the supplementary examination of the 7th semester held in January, 2007. Counsel for the University submits that expeditious steps are being taken for the publication of the result and it will be done as expeditiously as possible. 3. Yet another grievance of the petitioner is about not awarding moderation marks. According to the University, the moderation is given only if with the moderation, a candidate can pass in the whole examination and in so far as the petitioner is concerned, even if moderation is given that will not lead to a situation where the petitioner will pass in the entire examination of the 7th semester. WPC 8701/08 :2 : 4. In view of the above, on the claim of moderation, this court will not be justified in directing that the petitioner should be awarded moderation. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp