IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16149 of 2011 KARI MAHTO @ RANJIT MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & Ors. ----------- 2/ 23.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Rs. 7,59,000/- is looted from the informant while he was on way to Bank. Suspicion is cast on this petitioner as named by spy, undoubtedly not admissible evidence, but robbery is against unknown and the same is good material for investigation in cases including robbery. Probabilities are there after arrest about confession leading to recovery and identification etc. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for bail is rejected. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)