I’E’l‘ITIONER : Smt. Sarita Saint W/o Late Shri L.D.Sahu, Aged about 4i years? R/o VilEage Sagar PD. Kathakani Tahsil Takhaipur, Dim. BHasyur (C.G.) VERSUS RESI’ONY)EN’I‘S : 1. Smie of Chhattisgarh, ’I‘hmugh: Th6 Saeretary, Forc3£ Mmrtmcm, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Dists‘ict — Raigur (C G.) Chief Coxiséwator @f §0rasg£ CG. Raipm‘. . DyV Director indmwati 'I‘iger Resme Imimvati N¢tioxm£ axk Biiapm Sauth Basia: kC G.) 4 Awoumam benerd1 Ramur (L (1) W‘UT PETITIOW UNDER ARTCLE zit) OF “HE CO\ 8mm? IGV OF ENDIA b3. Hou’Me Shin swish In Agmhotn, ,3“ Present: $hri 1),R.‘Pafe} Advocaaa f0: 1% petitianet Miss Sunita m 1 my} awycr m: 1 e Smwmspendcmx 1 {(5 3 Sim A.K.Bar1¥g Advncme appearing on hem f sf $hr1 $ K Benwal, Adwcma fm‘ ths i‘%3}30r1d6i‘xt NC). 4. iQ @ HlGrii (BURT (JF. CEHAT’ITSGARH AT BEMSFUR WRIT PETE'l‘ION (S) N0. 7(i94 0f2007 J)b¢‘~ ORAL ORDER ’Pasued on 08 day of Apm} 20%) With the consent of the parties, the matter is taker: up far haariag finaiiy. This Cami. in the matter of Wl’. No. 4642i20Q4 (Baijnath Manda} Vs. The State ofChhaxiisgarh & Ofhers) and other connected mattars. éirected me Cgmrnmw ‘to consider the, matter of retirai dugs as the disputad questiom of i’actg were involvat‘i. The Cammittee was constitumd by the State Govemmeni, gurguam t0 me order dateai 19.06.2006 eassed in Wl’. No. 196 UZGOé (Smt. Keja Bai Chaildrakar Vs. State Govemment ané otiwere) and order dated 11%.i)3.2€){}8 pagsed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2908 {State of Chhattisgarh «3’: (Myers V's. Baijnaih Mmdai ami another). Thus. thie peutwn is squareiy eevereé by the glmgment me 9rde¢ date-d 31’“ 0f 3anuairy, 2068 paesed in W3. No. 4642/2004 Baijnath Manda} (supra) ae submitteé by learned couneel appearing for the partieg. With the cmsent of the partias, thiS petitian is accorciing§y c§sp0$e£i 0f in the $am$ £erms La. the: office; ofthe, Aaivaca‘ie Genera} is éiremac} to send the case to the Cammmee, within a perioé of 15 days from, me ciate (3f receipt of a aopy of thiis orderx Thamaiier, the Commitme 3113.1}. imue notice to the petitioner anti tha efficem concerned, withilx a further perimi of 15 days. Tbs Committee shall consider and paw ordegr, in accordance Wi’th law” after afforoing propsr opportunity ofhearing to the peiiitiotier. Tho petitiooer alid the of¥ioors concerned may iiie additionai cloeumentej ifneoeseanj. The entire exercise inc1u¢iing payment ofretira} (mes, if any, to the petitioner be compieted within a perioo of four moniihs from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofihis order. The petitioner shall supply eXi'ra copy of‘the petitiom to Miss Suraita min, hmel mower for the Smtefreopom‘iems i, 2 anti 3, ami Shri A.K.Ba:rik, Advocate for resoonc‘ient No. 4: for onwarti transmission. Sdl— Satish K. Ag“mom Judge