IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.23529 of 2010 PINTU KUMAR @ NITU @ NIKU KUMAR son of Sakaldev Roy Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 14.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. By order dated 12.1.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No.46564 of 2009, the petitioner was granted bail but on condition that he would file an affidavit that he is not accused in any other case. However, since the petitioner was accused in one other case he could not file such an affidavit. It is submitted that the petitioner was remanded in that case from this case and there is no other case pending against him except this case and another case. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named, who is in custody since 9.6.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No.73 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner. The court shall ensure proper identification of the petitioner and the bailors preferably with photograph so that there is no confusion about their identity at a later point in time, (ii)That the - 2 - bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)