IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 2162 of 2011. Decided on: 24.10.2011. ___________________________________________ Dr. Brij Kishore Chauhan. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Romesh Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has already made a representation for the release of his salary with effect from 25th February, 2008 to 29th May, 2008. The case of the respondent-State is that the petitioner has been sanctioned the leave without pay, but without break in service, by the competent authority. The petitioner has not assailed this decision. However, the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - petitioner has highlighted all these aspects in his notice dated 22nd December, 2010. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Principal Secretary (Ayurveda) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh to take a final decision on the basis of the averments contained therein, within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, by passing a speaking and self contained order. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. Copy dasti, on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 24, 2011. (sck).