IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16200 of 2008 DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH S/O Sri Niranjan Prasad Singh, Resident of Village-Basuhar, P.S-Kurshela, District-Katihar…………Petitioner. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department. 3.The Director (Administration)Cum Joint Secretary, Human Resources Department…………Respondents. ----------- For petitioner:-Mr.P.N.Pathak, Adv. For State:-Mr. Lalit Kishore, AAG-3. ---------- 2/ 24-Nov-08 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in another identical transfer this Court has interfered. This Court has no difficulty in holding that transfer matters are never identical. In the present case, petitioner was transferred to Lakhisarai only on 28.6.2007 and by another transfer order dated 30.6.2008 he was sought to be disturbed and brought to Patna by the departmental authorities. The State Government scrutinized such transfers and on account of such scrutiny petitioner’s transfer made on 30.6.2008 has been cancelled by impugned order dated 17.10.2008 (Annexure-1). That order mentions the fact that earlier transfers were scrutinized by the State Governement and the cancellation is on the basis of communication received from Cabinet Secretariat Department. Considering the facts that earlier 2 transfers of petitioner made prior to posting at Lakhisarai were not objected to by the petitioner and in the present transaction the State Government appears to be justified in not allowing premature transfers, the writ petition is found to be without merit. However, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the writ petition so that he may pursue his grievance through a representation. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)