1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.6034 OF 2009. Bansidhar S/o Eknath Lahoti through its General Power of Attorney Dwarkanath S/o Bansidhar Lahoti. ... Petitioner. Versus Kamalabai W/o Ghisulal Jaju. ... Respondent. ... Mr.N.B.Narwade, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Vinod Patil, advocate holding for Mr.P.P.Darak, advocate for the Respondent. ... CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J. Date : 15.02.2010. PER COURT 1. By consent, the petition is being disposed of. 2. Counsel for the parties state that 2 instead of attachment of the house property in question, it would suffice if an undertaking is given by the petitioner to the effect that the said property will not be alienated, transferred in any manner and no third party interest will be created till final order in the proceedings for determination of mesne profits is rendered and that if such mesne profits are determined during the inquiry U/o XX Rule 12 of the C.P.C. then the suit house property shall carry charge of such amount. 3. If the undertaking is furnished before the Executing Court, to the above effect, the attachment order be deemed as declamped. It will be treated as substituted by the self-imposed prohibition from creating third party interest. 4. If the undertaking is not given within a period of of four (4) weeks then the petition will be deemed as dismissed. 5. The Executing Court shall expeditiously conduct the inquiry into the application for 3 mesne profits and conclude the same within a period of six (6) months as far as possible. (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) asp/office/wp603409