the case of Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006(11) MPJR-CG 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B.Ed/B.T.I. Exannnation Certificate on their own expenses. are covered by the circular dated 24.12.98 issued by the State Government ofMadhya Pradesh. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition g8) N0. 7177 0f 2067. PETITIC’NER : Bhanu Pratap Mahayana, ’S/o Late Shri Namingh Prasad Maharana, Aged about 39 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Girls Primary School Amoda. Block Nawagarh, Distt. Janjgir Champa (CG). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : '1. State of Chhattisgarh 8c Others Through The Secretary, Education Department DKS Bhawalg Raipur (CG) 2. District Education Officer, Distt. Janjgir Champa (CG): 3. Block Education OEicer, Biock Nawagarh, Distt. Janjgir Champa. (CG) (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present : Shn' Anil Singh Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner. Shn‘ AS'. Kachhwaha, Government Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 64m ofDecember, 2097) 1. The petitioner iS working as Assistant Teacher in Govt. Girls Primary School Amoda, Block Nawagarh, Distt. Janjgir Champa (CG). In the course of his services Assistant the has obtained B.Ed services as Teacher, petitioner Examination certificate on‘his own expenses in the year 1996. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the question involved, herein asto whether the teaeher’ who obtained B.Ed Examination Certificate on his own expenses is entitled to two advance increments. 3. According to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in View of the deeision of this Court in Leamed counsel for the petitioner further submits that the facts and questiml of law involved. in the presem casg squarely covered by decisiQn of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Mlinicipal Corporation, Durg and anniher (Supra), to whisk leamed counsel appealing for the reSpondentiState fairly concedes and agees with the averment made by leamed counsel appearing for the petitimier. Accoriiiiigly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B’Ed Examination Certiticate on his own expenses as per circulats dated 24.12.1998 & 01.03.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or note No order asto costs. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri i