^> ;L ^f '"e... ..^ "V^ -::/'w?SiSE»>« '•^wr ^E 11 ^V3 SF CHHATTSSGARH: •*t^. 'S*?5 11 lONfel 'jT PETITiON (S) N0. 48760F_200i Smt. Saraswati Thakur, wife of Shri R. Thakur, aged about 40 years; Resident of Sarafa Line, Nawab Mohaila, Behind of old Poiice Statlon, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (CG). 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Woman and Child Development and Social Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Director, Woman and Chiid Deveiopment, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). 3. The Collector, Kawardha, District Kabirdham 4. The District Woman and Child Development Officer, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (CG). t petition under Article 226 of th®Constitution of India) tench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri, J. •resei Shri P.P. Sahu, counsel for the pefationer. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy. Advocate Generai for the [Passed cn this 4 day of consent of iearned counsei appearing for the parties, the pet'rtion is heard finally. 2) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the pOTtioner does not want to contest this matter on merits, at this stage. However, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the concerned authorlties within a period of three days In the llght of the judgment and order dated 28 Juiy, 2008 passed by thss Court in Writ Petition (S) No.2607 of 2008 (Azad Mohammad Khan vs. State of Chhsffisgarh & another) and other connected matters, and the same may be directed to be considsred and decided, in accordance with !aw, within the prescribed time. 3) Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, iearned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the State submits that if the representation is made by the >hali be coi frl6 2.- % Gowri authority, in accordance with iaw, on its ov^n merits, within a period oft'nree weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. that no coereive steps shait be of the representation. State Gov/ernment sha!) examine rdance with iaw an<j auideljnes, issiied 4) Shri Thakur further sub against the petitioner, tiil the dis 5) I hope and trust that representation objectjveiy irt ao 6) In view of the foregoing, the petitlon stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Consequentiy, I.A.No.1/2008 aiso stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge B"'" 1 m". ' i