^.l^^l^- •Sl^//;;-~; ' l^...i<atf~:."B .i Nfc C^-)-- \s^zr~] /- IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BII.ASPUR WRIT PBTITIONV?Io. $o5i /2009 PETITIONER ,^^-^::. vX^.^^.'..--""" J>/i^^^)^"° ^-<^w^" w^" RESPONDENTS Shrimati Tara Shukla W/o Shanti Kumar Shukla, aged about ^44 years, R/o Village- Aghnpur Post - Pandaripani, Industrial Area, Gidam Road, Jagdalpur, District- Baster (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Mines & Mineral, Secretariat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector Baster Jagdalpur, Distt.- Baster, Jagdalpur (C.G.) The Deputy Director Geology and Mining Office at Jagdalpur, Distt.- Baster The Director Geology and Mining Chhattisgarh. The Additional Collector (mining department authorised Authority) Jagdalpur, Distt.- Baster The minining Offlcer Jagdalpur, Distt.- Baster Jagdalpur (C.G.) The Union of India through the Secretary department of mines and mineral resources New Delhi. n 1^^ l'".^.^- l'.^^" 2. o d /S Rekhchand Jain S/o P. Jain, aged 46 years, Mining Contractor and businessman resident of Jugdalpur Distt. Baster (C.G.) ^^^^^<^J| Rafik Khan S/o S Khan, ^ Aged 41 years, Mining Contractor Businessman resident of Jagdalpur, Distt.- Baster (C.G.) ^ 10. The Divisional Forest Officer, Jagdalpur in the District of Baster, Jagdalpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY APPROPRIATE WRIT DIRECTION OR ORDBR. A HIGH COURT OF CHHATT8SGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (CINO. 5091 OF 2009 Petrtioner Shrimati Tara Versus Respondents The State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRiT PETiTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF.THE CONSTiTUTION OF iNDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present:- Shri J.R.Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shrl P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State. Shri Aditya Khare, Advocate on behalf of Shri Kashif Shakeel, Advocate forthe Respondent No.7. Shri Manoj Pranjpe, Advocate for the respondent No.8 & 9. 2. 3. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 25th day of October, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with iiberty to make representation before the competent authorities under the provisions of law. Learned counsei appearing for otherside have no objection. It is ordered, as prayed for. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the afore-stated liberty. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri S Judge ashok