:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7559 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 7559 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 7559 OF 2008 Sadguru Jangali Maharaj Shikshan Sanstha, Kapur-Khed, Sangli & Anr. ..Petitioners versus Sunita Laxman Kaledhonkar & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. Y. A. Sakhare for the Petitioners. Mr. A. M. Joshi for the Respondent No. 1. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J. DATE : 20TH JANUARY, 2009. DATE : 20TH JANUARY, 2009. DATE : 20TH JANUARY, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard by consent. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners is correct in his submission that the learned Tribunal has not properly dealt with the application for condonation of delay. According to the learned counsel the delay ought not to have been condoned. In any case the question of condonation of delay ought to have been dealt with properly with reference to the various time periods involved. :2: 3. The learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submitted that the respondent No.1 has explained the delay properly. According to the learned counsel, the same may not have been considered in detail by the Tribunal, but may not be a reason for penalising the respondent No.1 for having convinced the Tribunal on the application for condonation of delay of that action. 4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I am of view that whether there is sufficient cause for condonation of delay or not can be assessed only if the Tribunal considers the cause that existed during a particular period. If more than one period of time is involved, then the Tribunal is duty bound to consider the causes putforth by the applicant with reference to those periods. All this is awfully lacking in the present order. The impugned order is therefore set aside. The matter is remanded back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision in accordance with law. This remand is made without expressing any opinion as to the merits of the order i.e. whether the delay should or should not be condoned. The Tribunal to decide the application for condonation of delay within a :3: period of one month from the date the parties appear before it. The parties are directed to appear before the Tribunal on 10.2.2009. Order accordingly. 5. Rule made absolute. (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.) (S. A. BOBDE, J.)