: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.134 OF 2008 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.106 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5676 OF 2006 Smt.Lata Dhondiba Shirke ..Petitioner. Vs. The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. ..Respondents. Mr.P.J.Pawar for the Petitioner. Mr.Tushar Talsania with Mr.Nishith Doshi i/b.M/s.Crawford Baley & Co. for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 3RD JUNE, 2008 DATED : 3RD JUNE, 2008 DATED : 3RD JUNE, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : Mr.Talsania states that the Respondents have never and do not insist on the Petitioner signing any contract as a condition precedent to their complying with the order of the Labour Court. He tenders a letter dated 18.1.2008 whereby the Petitioner was called upon to resume pursuant to the said order of the Labour Court. 2. The said letter does not does not contain any such condition as alleged by the Petitioner. The letter is tendered in Court, the same is taken on : 2 : record and marked ‘X’. 3. Mr.Talsania further states that if the Petitioner reports for duty within two weeks from today, she may be permitted to do so. 4. No further action in contempt is called for. Contempt Petition stands disposed of accordingly. ***