IN TEE HIGE GOURT OF JUDI$ATURE OF GHEATTISGARH: BILASPUR. mam EETEMDH No. Q-rljzoox C gQ%NV” PETITIQN‘ERS wwm 1). Raj Kumar Singh Rana, S/o $hri Vedyal Singh Eana, Aged abam 39 years Working as Consn'able (Radio) 3). All f’he pe‘bitioners are posted in e Office of Police TelecomGiadio} Zone, Bilaspur (C..). - Versus RESPoNDENTs 1). é, n—Wm 2). Unio of Xndia, Through: The Secrety, De pavement of Pars onnei/Hzblic Grievances and Pensi on, Third Floo, Lok Mak Bhawan, Khan Market New Delhi. The Advis ory Genmi'btee A(Presided over by Shri Lohani) Cons‘tituted under Section 1 of e M.P. Reorganisati on Act ,2000 Department of General Administration, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.). 3). Ma'tadeen Karoxiya, S/o Shari Ramcharan Ia]. Karoriya, Aged about years, Woing as Constae ( Radio). Q11 Prakash Sharma, S/o Shri Ram Gojpal Sharma, Aged about 39 years, Wox'Mng as Head Cona‘blé (Radio) aa Soate of Wdhya I’radesh, Through: fEhe Secre’bary, Depame of home Affairs, Vaabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.?.). éé h G M < , 39 rk bl n ar r , 7 h , ll rtnt -2u 9’4). State of chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Bepartment of Home Affairs, Mamralaya, D.K.S..Building, Baipur ( (LG. ). ' mm Pmxmxow mam ARTICLES 22%7é27 OF THE GCEMITUTICN OF IEDIA 6w MN“ HIGH COURT OF CHHAT’I‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotti. M Writ Petition No. 2626 of 2003 Petitioners ’ Raj Kumar Singh Rana 85 two others Vemus ‘ Respondents Union of India 8r. others Shri Rajsndra Tripathi, Advocafs for the petitioners. Sbri S. K} Beriwal, Stajiding counsel for Respondent No. 1‘ Shri Sachin Singh Rajput for Raspondent No. 2 8:, 3. Shn‘ Pmlkaj Shrivastava, Panel lawyer for tho respondent No. 4. ORAL ORDER ( 8th Fcbmary, 2006) Agnshetri, J. ? The following order of the Com was passed by Satish K. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the. petitioners are working in the ottice of the Superintendent of Police, Telecom (Radio), Bilaspur, The petitioners had submitted their ti optioo for serving in the State of Madhya Pradesh. The petitioners have been allocated to the State of Chhattisgarh and they wallt their reallocation to the State of Madhya. Pradesh. Leaxned counsel for the petitioliers, on instniction, submits that the petitioners be granted liberty to make a representation to the respondents for redressal of their gn'evanees. Leained counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to the said submission. In View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of finally, with liberty to the petitioners to make an appropriate representation to the respondents/authorities concerned, Within a period of two weeks from today, and the respondentslauthorities are directed to consider and decide the same, in an objective manner, in aceordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, if any. Certified copy, as per Rules. A, ’ saash K. AgnihOm Judge ‘. J name c in l