1 wp1613.11 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1613 OF 2011 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. S.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.B. Talekar, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 7TH APRIL, 2011 Trial Court has permitted the respondents-plaintiffs to amend their plaint to add relief of alleged subsequent encroachment and therefore recovery of possession. According to Advocate Mr. Deshmukh, the respondents- plaintiffs' contention and story of loss of possession subsequently is incorrect. 2. It is apparent that correctness of story is not relevant at this stage. It is open to petitioner-defendant to demonstrate before trial Court that respondents-plaintiffs were never in possession. 2 wp1613.11 3. As I do not see any jurisdictional error or perversity, hence, the present Petition is disposed of. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE gas/wp1613.11