Cr.Misc. M 19038 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 19038 of 2011 Date of decision: 25.11.2011 Adarsh Sharma @ Ady petitioner vs State of Haryana respondent Present:- Mr. DV Singh, Advocate. Ms. Sushma Chopra, Addl.A.G.Hry Mr.Rk Rana, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI, J. The petitioner seeks the concession of pre-arrest bail in a case registered at the instance of Dinesh Kumar alleging that daughter of the complainant was forced to sit on the motor cycle of the petitioner and on her refusal, the petitioner had taken away her bag containing a sum of Rs.3500/-. The petitioner had also threatened the daughter of the complainant that she would be kidnapped. Learned counsel for the complainant has intervened to submit that the complainant's daughter is a student of class 12 and the petitioner indulges in eve teasing and he threatens the complainant frequently. Learned State counsel on asking of the court informs that on investigation offence u/s 379 IPC has been deleted from the FIR and at present the petitioner is booked u/s 292(2)(a), 354/506 IPC I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It appears that the daughter of the complainant is known to the petitioner but at the same time it is also apparent that the petitioner is trying Cr.Misc. M 19038 of 2011 2 to exploit the said intimacy by threatening the complainant's daughter. The petitioner has joined the investigation. It does not appear to be a case of custodial interrogation but in order to maintain social harmony, the petitioner can be granted the concession of pre-arrest bail subject to some conditions. The petition is allowed subject to the following conditions. i) The petitioner will not, in any manner, directly or indirectly interfere in the peaceful living of the complainant and his daughter Anjum Verma. ii) He will not indulge in any activity of teasing or threatening Anjum Verma. iii) He will join the investigation as and when required by the police and will not tamper with evidence. This order will remain operative till presentation of challn. It is specifically made clear that in case of violation of any of the above said conditions at any time, it will be open to the complainant or Anjum Verma to approach this court to seek cancellation of this order. November 25 , 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE