IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21240 of 2009 DHARMENDRA KUMAR RAI @ DHARMENDRA RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 14.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Sections 392 of the Penal Code. The submission is that the F.I.R. is against four unknown. The only material is the confession of the petitioner allegedly before the Police, inadmissible in evidence. Learned counsel for the State from the materials in the case diary is unable to controvert the submission that there is no recovery of the motorcycle from the physical custody of the petitioner. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, abovenamed be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Bikramganj in Kachawan P.S. Case No. 3 of 2009. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)