IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.10076 of 2009 Date of Decision : March 23, 2011. M/s Hanson Agro Ltd. .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and Ors. .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr. N.K. Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Monica Chhibber Sharma, DAG, Punjab -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is statedly a functional unit and seeks a mandamus for the release of the assured and sanctioned interest subsidy. During the Course of hearing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim of the petitioner-Industry stands settled in its favour vide a new Government Policy, a copy of which is placed on record as Annexure P-10. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the above mentioned claim of the petitioner in the C.W.P.No .10076 of 2009 2 light of the later Government Policy (Annexure P-10), within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. March 23, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE