IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22710 of 2009 VIKASH KUMAR, son of Sri Ram Pravesh Chauhan, resident of Mohalla Tahal Tola, P.S. Rupaspur, District Patna Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- Cr.Misc. No.28370 of 2009 YOGENDRA KUMAR, son of Ram Bali Chauhan @ Bali Chauhan, resident of village Tahal Tola, P.S. Rupaspur, District Patna Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- Cr.Misc. No.18484 of 2009 PAPPU CHAUHAN, son of late Ram Chandra Chauhan, resident of village Tahal Tola, P.S. Rupaspur, District Patna Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 31.8.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the State. In the opinion of this Court the three petitioners, who were not named in the F.I.R., are entitled for being granted bail only on the basis that the allegation either in the F.I.R. or in the confessional statement of being assailant remains only against Sintu Kumar. The postmortem report in fact also would clarify that there was only one injury which as stated above is attributable to the main assailant. That being so, this Court would direct the abovenamed three petitioners to 2 be released on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Hawai Adda P.S.Case No. 130/2008. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/