IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P.-T No. 83 of 2009. Decided on 18th July, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Sahib Singh. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that though he has been continuously working since 1994, however, he has not been regularized/conferred work charge status. 2. Mr. Vikas Rathore, learned Deputy Advocate General has drawn the attention of the Court to Annexure R-V. It is evident from the contents of Annexure R-V that the petitioner has only worked for more than 240 days in 1994, 2006 and 2007. Since the petitioner is required to complete ten years’ continuous service with 240 days in a block of twelve calendar months, no directions can be issued for his regularization. 3. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 18, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - - 3 - `