1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO.95 OF 2010 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Mr.D. V. Tele, AGP for appellant. D. R. Jaybhar, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. ........ [CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. ] DATE : 21st January, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard both the Counsel. The State feels the enhancement effected by the learned Reference Judge by order dated 17.01.2007 is excessive. 2. With the assistance of both Counsel I have gone through the Judgment under challenge. The learned Judge has considered the sale instances prior to the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. The land to the extent of 40 Are are sold which was non-irrigated land and he has for the purpose of calculation doubled the price making it Rs. 2 1 Lacs to be the rate on the date of notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. 3. The learned Judge has found that the land acquired out of Gat no.139 was 63 Are while land acquired from Gat No.135 was 30 Are. The calculation arrived at by the learned Judge of enhancement is in tune with the record. No interference is called in first appeal, hence dismissed. No costs. [ K.U.CHANDIWAL ] JUDGE gas/fa95.10