HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23806 2010 Date 19.10.2010 Between: Karanam Ramu Naidu. ..... PETITIONER AND The Tahsildar, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the petitioner :Sri P.Sri Ram Counsel for the Respondent : Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23806 of 2010 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent in issuing notice under Rule 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Rules, 2007 in respect of land admeasuring Ac.2.74 cents comprised in Sy.No.87/3 of Asakapalli Village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District as wholly illegal. Heard Sri P.Sri Ram, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignments). The petitioner claims to be the owner of the above- mentioned land having purchased through an unregistered sale deed from one Vankara Ramulu S/o. Appaiah for valuable consideration. The petitioner has received the above-mentioned notice from the respondent wherein he is asked to show-cause why he shall not be summarily evicted from the land. According to the petitioner, as he is a bona fide purchaser for valuable consideration, he is not liable for eviction. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignments), on instructions, submitted that in pursuance of the show-cause notice referred to above, the legal heir of the original owner has submitted his explanation while the petitioner has not submitted explanation and that a final order was passed on 26.08.2010 under Section 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 ordering for eviction of the petitioner from the land in question. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that no such order has been served on his client. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignments) is unable to state whether the order has been served on the petitioner or not. When an order adverse to the interest of the petitioner is passed, it is incumbent upon the respondent to serve the same on the petitioner to enable him to avail his remedy available in law. Therefore, the respondent is directed to serve a copy of the order on the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. For a period of two weeks from the date of service of the order, the respondent shall not evict the petitioner. The petitioner is entitled to avail his remedy, if he feels aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the main petition, WPMP.No.30458 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:19.10.2010 usd