IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37314 of 2008 1.SANJOY JAISWAL 2.Munna Jaiswal 3.Raju Jaiswal 4.Rajesh Jaiswal all Ss/o of Sunder Jaiswal All resident of village-Semera, P.S.-Chainpur, Dist.-Kaimur(Bhabhua) 5.Indu Devi w/o Santosh Jaiswal R/o village-Kakuri Kundi, P.S.-Chainpur, Distt.-Kaimur(Bhabhua) At present resident of Hata Bazar, P.S.-Chainpur,Dist.Kaimur(Bhabhua) 6.Subhash Chandra Jaiswal s/o Sunder Jaiswal R/o village-Semere, P.S.-Chainpur Distt.-Kaimur(Bhabhua) Versus 1.STATE OF BIHAR 2. Malti Devi W/o Subhash Chandra Jaiswal R/o village-Semere P.S.-Chainpur, Distt.-Kaimur (Bhabhua) at present resident father house of village Badhauna, P.S.-Chainpur, Distt.-Kaimur at Bhabhua ------ 3. 15.1.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, complaint- opposite part no.2 and the State. A complaint case has been filed under section 498A and some other sections of the Indian Penal Code and section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complainant has been married with petitioner no.6. The allegation is that all the accused persons have tortured the complainant on account of inability to bring additional dowry by way of Rajdoor motorcycle. On behalf of petitioner no.6 it has been submitted that he is husband and he is ready to keep the complaint in his house with full dignity which she deserves. Petitioner nos.1, 2, 3 and 4 are brother of the husband of the complainant and petitioner no.5 is married sister of the husband of the complainant and address is of different village. The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned counsel for the complainant. - 2 - Considering the relationship of the complainant with the accused persons, namely, petitioner nos.1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 named above, their bail petitioners are allowed. They are directed to surrender before the court below within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and on their so surrendering they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub.Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhabhua in connection with Comp. Case No.810 of 2006, Tr. No.1455 of 2008. So far as petitioner no.6 is concerned he is husband and his case cannot be equated with other co-accused. I am not inclined to grant him anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. Md.S. (Shyam Kishore Sharma,J.)