1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL SECOND APPEAL No. 315 of 2006 INDER DEV V/S LRS. OF SITA DEVI & ANR. Mr. KC SAMDARIYA, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. MADANMOHAN, respondent present in person. Date of Order : 17.9.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the appellant, and perused the impugned judgments, so also the record. The learned courts below have recorded a finding about the plaintiff having failed to prove himself to be adopted son of Gokalchand, and for arriving at this finding they have also considered the admission of the plaintiff wherein he has admitted to be adopted son of Ranglal. It has also been considered that in various Wills executed by Gokalchand though some properties were given to the appellant but then in those Wills the appellant has not described him as adopted son, but has been described as a cousin brother, or the testator's father's cousin brother. In my view, the findings are pure findings of fact, and are not vitiated on any of the grounds available 2 under Section 100 C.P.C. The appeal thus does not involve any substantial question of law, and the same is, therefore, dismissed summarily. The record of the learned courts below be returned forthwith. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /sushil/