{ t\ $-A-3 & A-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) l]-2Il2OI0 & CM No.15754|2OLO (for stay) ALOKE FIBRE-TECH PW LTD & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.ParagChawla,Advocate. VCTSUS rhroush: Mr.Nar<ur safnoffiSl$;ij,". AND BRT LTD ) c,R.P. L87120]-0 BRT LTD Through: versus M r. N a ku r t" ;il;:;:',txl;i.".". ALOKE FIBRE-TECH PVT LTD & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.ParagChawla,Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR 1, ORDER o/o 15.1L.2Of.1 Order impugned before this Court is the order dated L2,8.20I0 wherein in a suit filed by the plaintiff i.e. B.R.T. Ltd. under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to the as the Code) conditional leave to defend had been granted to the defendants; the condition was that IOO% of the suit amount be Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified D deposited by the defendant in the Court. In an appeal filed before the High Court this condition was modified and the 100% direction had been reduced to 50% vide order of the High Court dated 22.9.20:.0. The said amount has since been deposited in the trial court and the trial is in progress. The status of the case as on date is that the issues have been framed and the matter is fixed for plaintiff evidence. These are two revision petitions which have been filed by both the parties. Both the parties had been aggrieved by the impugned order. Both the parties now state that they are not pressing the present petitions; which are accordingly disOosed of. l,/ l,/ INDERMEET KAUR, J NOVEMBER 15, 2OLL nandan )