HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W. P. No. 15610 of 2009 O R D E R:- The main grievance of the petitioner is that though a case in Cr. No. 27(A) of 2005 has been registered against him on the allegation that he acquired disproportionate assets known to his sources of income, which is numbered as C.C. No.13 of 2008 on the file of the Special Judge for CBI cases and pending trial, and while the same is pending, it is the case of the petitioner that the respondent, on the similar set of facts, is initiating disciplinary proceedings against him vide Charge Memo dated 25.03.2009. Hence, the present writ petition is filed seeking to quash the Charge Memo and issue appropriate direction to the respondent not to proceed further. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material placed on record. The apex Court rendered a judgment in …………., wherein it is held as follows: The law is well settled that even though the a criminal case is pending on file of the leaned Judge against an individual on certain allegations, there is no bar that the disciplinary proceeds cannot be initiated on the similar set of grounds unless and until the petitioner is prejudiced in any manner by the effect of the criminal case. The petitioner except stating that the allegations leveled against him by the respondent and the allegations made against him in criminal case are identical the petitioner has not produced any material before this Court substantiating his plea this Court cannot grant the relief as sought for by the petitioner in this writ petition in view of the judgment rendered by the apex Court (supra). Hence, I see no merits in this writ petition, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 3rd August, 2008 bcj