IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO : 22030 of 2008 Between: 1 S.P.Prabhakar S/o.Bichanna R/o.Qtr.No.F-11 P&T colony, Chikkadpally Hyderabad 2 S.P.Chaitanya S/o.S.P.PRabhakar R/o.Qtr.No.F-11 P&T colony, Chikkadpally Hyderabad Petitioners 2 to 4 being minors rep.by their father/natural guardian Sri.S.P.PRabhakar (Pet.No.1) 3 S.P.Sainath S/o.S.P.PRabhakar R/o.Qtr.No.F-11 P&T colony, Chikkadpally Hyderabad Petitioners 2 to 4 being minors rep.by their father/natural guardian Sri.S.P.PRabhakar (Pet.No.1) 4 S.P.Prathusha D/o.S.P.PRabhakar R/o.Qtr.No.F-11 P&T colony, Chikkadpally Hyderabad Petitioners 2 to 4 being minors rep.by their father/natural guardian Sri.S.P.PRabhakar (Pet.No.1) ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The State Bank of India.,Toopran Branch,AT Toopran medak .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ or direction preferably writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent bank in taking steps to take possession of part of residential house bearing No.1-1-592/F,Gandhinagar,New Bakaram, Hyderabad despite pendency of OA.No.152/04 on the file of learned Debt Recovery Tribunal,Hyderabad as illegal, arbitrary,and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner for OTS and grant further time as mentioned in the latest representation dated 29.9.2008 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner :SMT.S.A.V.RATNAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO : 22030 of 2008 Order : ( per Sri GM, J ) Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and hence the writ petition has become infructous. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructous. No costs. _____________ GM, J __________ VVA, J Dt : 29-6-2009 Kk THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO : 22030 of 2008 29-6-2009