1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18 OF 2008 IN IN IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 13 OF 2007 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 13 OF 2007 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 13 OF 2007 Datta Narayan Rane. .. Applicant. vs. Gautam Shamrao Kambale & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. Sugandh B. Deshmuch for Applicant. Mr. C.R. SONAWANE for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Prashant Kulkarni for Respondent Nos. 3 to 6, 8,11 and 17. CORAM: J.N. PATEL & CORAM: J.N. PATEL & CORAM: J.N. PATEL & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATE: 5TH MAY, 2008. DATE: 5TH MAY, 2008. DATE: 5TH MAY, 2008. (IN CHAMBER AT 5.00 P.M.) (IN CHAMBER AT 5.00 P.M.) (IN CHAMBER AT 5.00 P.M.) P.C. . This application is filed by a stranger to seek recall of our order dated 28.11.2007 in public interest litigation and permit him to prosecute the petition by joining the petitioner as one of the Respondent. It is the grievance of the applicant that the petitioner misled this Court by stating that he may be permitted 2 to withdraw the petition as the grievance agitated in the public interest litigation has been resolved, which is not a fact. 2. In our view, this Court has not examined the petition on merit. It was allowed to be withdrawn for the reason that the petitioner made a categorical statement that the grievance has been resolved. 3. In case, the applicant is interested in agitating the issue, he is at liberty to file a separate petition which can be examined on its own merits. With this observation, the application stand rejected. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.) (Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.) (Smt. Nishita Mhatre, J.)