1 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINA WRIT PETITION NO. 1778 OF 2010 Reena Richard w/o Rolland Richard Mathews .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Mr. Rahul Pandey i/by M/s. Pandey and Co. for petitioner. Mr. P. A. Pol, PP for State. Mr. Nepoleon Gonsalves for respondent no.5. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. JUNE 30, 2010. P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. We have perused the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of respondent no.5. Mr. Pol, the learned PP has also placed before us a copy of the investigation done by the police. It appears that there is a dispute between the petitioner and the society i.e. Guru Govind Singh Nagar Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. of which the petitioner is a member, on payment of society dues and service charges etc. The petitioner alleges that supply of water connection to her flat has been disconnected and this has been denied by the society. 2 In any case, it is a dispute regarding the management of the respondent no.5 – society and, therefore, the petitioner’s remedy would lie before the Cooperative Court. Hence the petition is disposed with liberty as is available in law. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)