THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH CONTEMPT CASE No.484 of 2011 DT.09.09.2011 Between: Pandu Ranga Rao Deshmukh S/o Kishan Rao Deshmukh … Petitioner And Shri Inder Singh, Assistant Director of Survey & Land Records, Sanga Reddy, Medak District … Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati Counsel for respondent: Sri The Court made the following COMMON ORDER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH Contempt Case No.No.484 of 2011 O R D E R: Heard the learned counsel on both sides. This Contempt Case is filed alleging non-compliance of the orders 30-4-2010 passed by this Court in C.C.No.90 of 2008 in W.P.No.25662 of 2007, The operative paragraph of the order dated 30-4-2010 in C.C.No.90 of 2008 reads as follows: Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the contempt case is disposed of directing the respondent to demarcate the land sold by the petitioner to an extent of Ac.35- 03 gts. in favour of Acha Srinivas Rao, Prasanna Lakshmi and Krishnaveni and assign appropriate survey numbers in respect of the land retained by the petitioner and sold by the petitioner from out of total extent of Ac.63-09 gts., situated at Kandichimnapur Village, Sangareddy Mandal, Medak District. There shall be no order as to costs. The respondent/Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records, Sanga Reddy, Medak district filed counter affidavit. Third paragraph of Paragraph 4 of the counter affidavit reads as under: “Accordingly new survey numbers have been assigned for each part and parcel of the “Bila Dakhla land” without prejudice to the title over the land (un surveyed Block) including the land claimed by the petitioner and a sketch showing the assured new survey numbers is furnished to the concerned Tahsildar Sangareddy Mandal. The Asst. Director/Respondent herein is not competent to decide the title over the land and the Revenue Authorities have to decide the pattadari rights if any over the land as per rules in force. There is no physical possession of the petitioner or the purchasers over the land so claimed to an extent of Area 63-09 gts. However as per the boundaries roughly identified by the petitioner”. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the aforesaid statement made in the counter affidavit, the order of this Court has been substantially complied with. However, he submits that on filing an appropriate application, the petitioner is entitled to the assignment of the new survey numbers assigned to him as well as to his purchasers. Accordingly, the respondent on an appropriate application filed by the petitioner, shall furnish to the petitioner as well as to his purchasers new survey numbers assigned to each part and parcel of the “Billa Dakhla land” to an extent of Ac.35-03 gts along with sketch, within two weeks from the date of filing of such application. No costs. Contempt Case is accordingly closed. No costs. _______________ (V. ESWARAIAH,J) DATE: 09.09.2011 grk THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH Contempt Case No.No.484 of 2011 DATE: 09.09.2011