1 ABA 12 OF 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 12 OF 2010. Baburao Doulu Patil .. Applicant -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. Mr. G. M. Savagave, for the Applicant. Mrs. P.P. Bhosale, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 17th January, 2011 P.C. 1. The applicant is a Gram Sevak, who is alleged to have misappropriated a sum of Rs.4,36,203/- during the period from 17.01.2008 to 28.6.2008. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is not at all involved in the same, but in order to show his bonafides and without prejudice to his rights and contentions, the applicant would deposit a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- excluding the amount of Rs. 34,000/- shown as temporary misappropriation, before the learned Trial Court. In view of this, the applicant being in custody may not be necessary. Therefore, in the event of applicant’s arrest in CR No.32 of 2010, registered with the Gaaganbawda Police Station, District:Kolhapur, he be released on bail on his furnishing PR Bond in the sum of Rs. 2 ABA 12 OF 2011 25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.25,000/- on the following conditions : i) The applicant shall deposit a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- before the learned Trial Court, out of which an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- be deposited within a period of two weeks and remaining amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- be deposited within a period of four weeks; which amount the learned Trial Court, shall invest in the nationalized bank to earn maximum interest and shall deal with the same at the end of the trial as per result. ii) The applicant shall make himself on 24th January, 2011 at 11.00 a.m., available for interrogation by Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required Investigating Officer. iii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iv) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. i) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial 3 ABA 12 OF 2011 Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, in S.L.P No.7615 of 2009. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)