IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.704 of 2009 SHUKHDEO SHARMA Versus MANNU SHARMA ----------- 2. 13.5.2009 Heard Shri Pramod Manbansh learned counsel for the petitioner. The revision petition has been filed questioning the refusal by the Munsif, Manjhaul(Begusarai) to incorporate amendments as sought to be made by the petitioner by his petition dated 17.11.2008 filed for that purpose in the court below. The learned Munsif, while passing the impugned order on 3.1.2009 in Title( Eviction) Suit No. 21 of 2003 was of the view that by incorporating the amendments sought to be incorporated by the petitioner the very nature of the suit was to be changed. I have perused the original plaint in context to the amendments which were sought to be incorporated in the plaint and I find that there was no material change to be brought in to the nature of the suit and those amendments sought to be incorporated appear necessary facts to be 2 incorporated in the plaint. The revision petition is, therefore, allowed and the necessary amendments be incorporated ,as per law, in the plaint of the petitioner. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)