^ / IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(sl N0. U^l OF 2009 PETITIONER VERSUS Laxman Pal, S/o Shri KalaRam Pal, Aged about 42 years, R/o Ward No.3, Behind of Old PS Cheekhli, Rajnandgaon Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) RESPONDENTS 1.--- ^•f/^' .^W/ ^^•^•f^f' ^ '.•n^-W /'^:y • "^' State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department of School Education, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) Director, Directorate of F>ublic Instructions, Raipur Distt. Raipur Collector, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) Principal, ~ Middle School, Hd^di, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) District Education Officer, Distt. Rajnandgaon (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ifc< K f^i'. iu« ! 1 TCT 3IRRI »*iw •3^ airqipiq, /es'til'H'is, Riynyy ^•fraWTBWKR ,a..^...^^^^ SIT^T WW (ij*lf:l«<<tr) ^ .'. •?• 23.8,2009 Shri R.K.Pali, counsel for Shri U.N.S.Deo, G.A. for tbe Challenge in the preser 30.6.2009 passed by the Rajnandgaon (respondent N0.1 working as Upper Division Middle School, Haldi to Dongergaon. Contention of the counsi present place ot posting the peti, there are total five sanctioned and the petitioner is the only he too will be transferred there I subject. He further submits thq of the petitigner and that adm'riistrative exigency for tran^ Confention of the counl petitioner make a representaticjn same would be decided in accorijiance Counsei for the petitione: However, he submits that till petitioner may be given some Accordingly, the petition tbiOfatfld WWft' ^ 'fWt (F^t^R ^aifiwOT^r the petitioner. State. }t petition is to the order dated Di^trict Education Officer, Distriot .6( by which the petitioner who is T^acher has been transferred from [Middle School, Sanginkachaar, ^l for the petitioner is that in his f:ioner hasjoined on 22,9.2008 and Iposts of Upper Diwision Teachers t^acher in the science subject and if (vill not be any teacher for the said (t no one has been posted in place litself shows that there is no Iferring the petitioner. sel for the State is that let the n to the respondent No.6 and the with law. ~ agrees to make a representation. representation is decided, the order. tlIS prptectwe is disposed of with a direction to i'}l^_T>e1~if'ii'^rSfai'~t^^?Tifl-lc<?...A...^faT^y^j&.6^Aa^usn^iazifkiJj^.-a^QF> r^f t^.ri .H^t/'j? vmvn »iw«h 3^ •^IIKt^, B-at'M'Ko, fstMI'My j.P. c^ Hfc-^/ ^ •-fWt200 7 si^i'q'R; ('^f3^S?) sn^r w R-fi+ WITartW <&' 'romn^tetsii^i -z-/ from the date of receipt of th be decided within a period receipt. Till then the impugr and the petitioner would be present piace of posting. ^Prf^T^t'f WfcRff ^f 'ftT3l' ^f^T^R i73)fin3ii^r e copy of this order, the same wouid af three weeks from the date of its led order shatl not be given effect to |allowed to perform his duties in the Sd/- Pritiiiker Diwakar Jut^e —