IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2008 / 10TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 26225 of 2008(V) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- P.BIJU, S/O.P.PALLY, AGED 35 YEARS, SWAMY SADANAM, KANNIYAMPURAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURIKAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. KERALA SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD, P.B.NO.50, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD, P.B.NO.50, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 3. THE MANAGER, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, (SIDCO), OTTAPALAM, SHORNUR-2. BY ADV. SRI. R.T.PRADEEP,SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J ================== W.P(C)No.26225 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 1st day of September, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioner was allotted plot in an industrial estate by the 1st respondent. When the petitioner wanted to construct a factory therein, the petitioner has been prevented from cutting thereon which is allegedly necessary to facilitate such construction. In the above circumstances, the petitioner has filed Ext.P5 representation before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 expeditiously. 2. I have heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent also. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs