1 wp6111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 61 OF 2011 Tukaram Baburao Shinde & Anr. ...Petitioners V/s. Gruh Finance Limited & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. P.B. Shah for the Petitioners Mr. H.J. Dedhia, A.P.P., for the State. CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: 12TH JANUARY, 2011 P.C.:- Not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on Board. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners, in all fairness, states that symbolic possession of the disputed property has already been taken over by the respondent-Bank. If it is so, the grievance made in this petition can be agitated by the petitioners in the proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal while questioning the action taken by the respondent-Bank under the Securitisation Act. All questions in that 2 wp6111 behalf are left open. In the event symbolic possession of the disputed property is not taken, it will be open to the respondent-Bank to take the same within two weeks from today by giving prior intimation in that behalf to the petitioners. The respondent-Bank, however, shall not physically dispossess the petitioners from the disputed premises for a period of two weeks from today or two weeks from the date of taking symbolic possession, whichever is later, to enable the petitioners to approach the DRT by way of appropriate proceedings; and seek direction as may be permissible in law. 3. Petition disposed of on the above terms. A.R. JOSHI, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.