THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.23763 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner is aggrieved by the failure of the respondents in not taking any action on his representation dated 06.06.2011 whereby he had requested them to demarcate the assigned land of Ac.2.08 cents in Sy.No.443-B1, and fix the boundaries. Facts, in brief, are that the petitioner and his brother claim to own agricultural lands, admeasuring Ac.9.52 cents in Sy.No.443-B of Jowkala Village, Amadaguru Mandal, Ananthapur District, along with a house, and a borewell thereupon. The government is said to have acquired Ac.2.08 cents from out of the Ac.9.52 cents in Sy.No.443-B during the life time of the petitioner’s father to provide house sites to the weaker sections; award No.65/97-98 dated 21.03.1998 was passed by the second respondent; and compensation was paid to the petitioner’s father. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that, at the time of acquisition, the land was neither demarcated nor boundaries drawn resulting in the beneficiaries creating problems to him and his family members, and in trying to occupy his house. From the facts narrated hereinabove, it is evident that the petitioner’s grievance relates to encroachment by the assignees over his patta lands the remedy for which is a suit before the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction. Any grievance, which the petitioner may have, regarding fixing of boundaries or demarcating the lands assigned, can also be resolved in the civil proceedings instituted by him before the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction. Leaving it open to the petitioner, if he so chooses, to avail the remedy of a civil suit before the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction, I see no reason to entertain this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, much less grant the relief sought for. The Writ Petition fails and is, accordingly, dismissed. However, in the circumstances, without costs. RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J Date:24.08.2011 usd