WP(C) 886/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. A Hai, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. R Bora, lea rned Government Advocate, for the State respondents. Basic grievance of the petitioner is that he had lodged an information with the Officer-in-Charge, Silapathar Police Station, Dhemaji, that on 19-02-2009, one M on Bahadur of village Telem, along with 25 others, had entered into his house an d obtained, by intimidating him, his (informant’s) signatures on three blank pap ers. The petitioner also claims that though the information was lodged as indica ted hereinbefore, no action was taken by the Officer-in-Charge, Silapathar Polic e Station, Dhemaji, and the petitioner, therefore, made a representation, in thi s regard, on 21-02-2009, to the respondent No. 3, namely, Superintendent of Poli ce, Dhemaji, but despite the fact that a representation was made to the responde nt No. 3, no action, in accordance with law, has been taken by the respondents. Appearing, now, on behalf of the respondents, Mr. Bora has produced a communicat ion, dated 05-05-2010, made to him, by the respondent No. 3, namely, Superintend ent of Police, Dhemaji, wherein the respondent No. 3 has stated to the effect th at a case has been registered on the basis of the petitioner’s said representati on, the case number being Silapathar Police Station Case No. 64 of 2009 under Se ctions 384/407/420/468 IPC and that the investigation is in progress. By the sai d communication, dated 04-05-2010, the respondent No. 3 has also informed that t he statements of the informant and his witnesses have been recorded. Situated thus, it is submitted, on behalf of the petitioner, that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach this Cou rt with appropriate application, in future, if so advised. To the submission, so made, no objection has been raised on behalf of the respondents. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, this writ petition is disposed of on being withdrawn by the writ petitioner with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, i n future, if so advised.