^ ^\^] SFNGLE BE-NCR' "<. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition(C.) NO.^^L//2011 PETITIONER / Bhanuram S/o Late Shri Bhau i^" Aged about 55 years, R/o ViUage Nisdah, Tahsil Arang, Distdct Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS . \^^< ^y^\^' ^v.'^\/< ~^^ ^ ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Upper Collector Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.) 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 4. Tahsildar Arang, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •?1 ^•^.'-"" HIGH COURT OF CHHA'mSGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON <Q No. 3854 of2011 PETITIONER RE8PONDENTS Bhanuram. VER8U8 State ofChhattisgarh & Ofhers. WKIT PETTHON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS'nTUTION OF INDLA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri, J. Present: Shri S.K-Dadsena, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Shri Shashank Tliakur, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 18 day ofJuly, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits tfaat by order dated 21.06.2007, passed mW.P.(C) No. 3843/2007 (Aimexure P/l) by tiiis Court, the order dated 09.10.2006 passed by the Board of Revenue, Raipur, was set aside and the matter was remitted to the Additional Collector, Raipur to considerlhe application offhe petitioner, after affbrding an opportunity of hearing to fhe parties and pass order in accordance wifh law. Since then, fhe matter is pending consideration before the Additional Collector and mor^ than four years have passed, but no decision has been taken by fhe Additional Collector, Raipur. According to Shri Dadsena, fhe Additional Collector has deliberately adopted the delaying tactics not to givejustice to fhe petitioner in time. 2, Shri Thakur, leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents submite fhat necessary direction to decide the case wifhin the stipulated time may be passed. 3. In view ofthe above, fhe Additional Collector, Raipur, is directed to consider and decide the pendmg case, as afbrestated, as early as possible, preferably wifhin a period of six months from the date of receipt ofa copy offhis order on its own merite aiid perspective. 4. With fhe aforestated observation aiid direction, tihe writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit