IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 836 of 2008 Sri Ramesh Chand ............... Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others .............. Respondents Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C. S. Rawat, J. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Punjari, Addl. G.A. for the respondents Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. 2. After due consideration of the submission of the learned counsel for the parties; the contents of the F.I.R.; the averment made in the F.I.R.; the fact that lease deed has been executed by Arun Kumar as the power of attorney of the information; and the fact that the body of the lease deed contains that the lady has given the power of attorney to Sanjay Ghai, co-accused, I do not find any ground for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 30.08.2007 lodged by respondent No.3, on the basis of which a Case Crime No. 46 of 2007 u/s 420, 467, 468 and 471 I.P.C. was registered at Police Station Kotwali, Dehradun against the petitioner. 3. I am refraining form commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversity affect the petitioner’s case at the trial, which is yet to start. 4. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. 5. Consequently, the CLMA No. 7003 of 2008 also stands dismissed. 6. The observation made in this order shall not prejudice the prosecution during the trial as well as during the hearing on the bail application. 21.10.2008 (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Shiv