IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29575 of 2009 AMAR KUMAR SINHA SON OF LATE TRIBENI PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BINDIHA, P.S. ROSHRA, DIST. SAMASTIPUR …. PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …. O.P ----------- 3. 27.8.2009 It is being submitted by the Counsel for the Vigilance that it is not a vigilance case and, therefore, his name should be deleted and now as opposite party only the State of Bihar subsists. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 418, 467, 348, 471 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(1) (D) of the Prevention of Atrocities Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the only allegation is that there was certain irregularities having been committed in the appointment of Asha Bahu, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 1.6.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A.K.Sharan, Special Judge (Vigilance), Muzaffarpur in connection with Spl. Case No.20 of 2009 arising out of Bibhutipur P.S.case No.187 of 2008, subject to the conditions (i) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, 2 he shall not be released on bail and (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )