^ .•* ^.^^^-- ^'tHE.fl'tGHCOURT OF CHHAmSGAKH AT BILASPURICG) ^ PETITIONER ?\^ WRIT PETITION N0. n3^ 72006 RESPONDENTS ^l. Smt. Sheetlawati, aged about 28 widow of Late Lalchand occupation - "Sah-Sahayeeka" Aangan Badi, Nutrition and Food Disfa-ibution Centre, Harijan Para Banaur, Gram Panchayat Chitbishrampur, Block Balrampur, Tah. Paal, District Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Women and Child Development, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Union of India, through Ministry of Women and Child Welfare, New Dehli. The District Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) District Women and Child Wetfare officer, Distt. Surguja (CG) . Chief Executive OfGcer, Janpad Panchayat - Balrampur, Distt. Surguja (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, "^ " *1111\~l'^i 0' MIX^ sn^i^i h-tt* 3^1 ^llN;^^! 3T[^?T TRr^ /JJ2- 11HCTI VhHlch 'Vi. 200^ [ci-()<y sii^iTOnwafgti 19.04.2006 Shri Prafull Bharat, Advocatf Bhakta, counsel for the petitioners in 1332/06, 1005/06 and 1006/06. Shri Prafull Bharat, counsel for| Shri S.K. Beriwal, counsel for U Shri U.N.S. Deo, G.A. with A.^ its authorities. We have heard learned couns4 By these petiti'ons the main gri are present'y v/orking as Sahsahika s<\ for the purposes of distribution of ^ notification dated 19.01,2006 issued treatment has been provided for Aanganv/adi v/orkers to the persons on the post of.Sahsahika whereas th| rural area,s have not been given simil; - Notices of these petitions wei] response to the said notices reply ha|s which ithas been mentionecfthat vid( dated 19.01.2006 has been suDersecje by v.'hich it has been made clear thaf v/ho are v/orking in therural as well preferential treatment for the appoiijitment they are otheriwise eligible for the sai'jl <<ii'l<iri<ii-i ^wvS 4 fezt '<r3f(^i< ^; 3lf;(TO 311^1 ^ appears 'on behalf of Shri A.N. W.P.Nos. 1329/06, 1330/06, 1331/06 |the petitioner in W.P.No. 1425/06. Inion of India. tKachhav/aha, P.L. forthe State and •I forthe parties. s'/ance raised by the petitioners who the rural areas of District - Sarguja upplementary nutrition, is that vide >y the State Government prefereritial the appointment on the post of '«vho are working in the urban areas e petitioners vAo are working in the ir treatment. |e issued to the respondents and in 's oeen fi'ed on behalf of the State in le order dated 10.04.2006, the order ed vide notific.ation dated 10.04.2006 now in the \vhote State Sahsahiiras as in the urban areas shail be given of Aanganwadi Karyakarta if post. [- ^,- .?,. ''^..•~~ffl-,'~^,.— .— ~.'sK;Ti"-.aBlssSHa^iu'^'"';- XI-HC-22 V^ '>iM\V\ft, ©iflu'Ko.l°<fll't*y 3H^T 'q?RE VWv\\ ^yj^---------"---^ 200 •te^g"""""" ^ an^t^ r<;-licb 3(1^1 Shliti'(ifel SII^I TCIIWdfel Learned counsel for the parti^ supersession grievance ofthe js submit that in view ofthis order of petitiojiers stands vindicated. of Now, in view of above, nothin| petitions as grievance ofthe as such the petitions are disposed stay^ranted on 30.0S.2006 stands v^cated Sd/- ; L.C.Bhadoo Judge fe remains to be decided in these writ petition^rs has already been attended to and having become infructuous and the <hl'4(cl''fl-l 'qreff If.fe3t TRR^: ^r aipai; aii^r '^ Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge ^y^ ^ 'y ^f [T^^figT, ^.'•-VI!l'WIH""'v'^-f!~s'