IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M- 6071 of 2011 Date of decision:- 10.3.2011 Smt. Munesh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Sajjan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. RITU BAHRI J. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 02.2.2011 passed by the District & Sessions Judge, Gurgaon in a revision whereby the prayer made by the petitioner for recalling Sh. B.R. Beri (DW6) for cross-examination has been dismissed. Mr. Sajjan Singh, Advocate counsel for the petitioner has argued that after the public prosecutor had cross-examined Sh. B.R. Beri as DW6, the complainant has a right to cross-examine after recalling the said witness. The order of the District Judge, does not suffer from any illegality. As per Section 301 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure Public Prosecutor is in- charge of the case. Once he has conducted the cross-examination of DW6 Sh. B.R. Beri, the complainant has no independent right to recall the witness. The criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of. 10.3.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Vijay Asija JUDGE