SINGLE BB?CH u^ © IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G) W.P. fS) N0. 3^5L3 /2011 ^y>^ ^-••'•""' :1 ^2. 3. 4. 5. / 6. Dhujram Kurre, aged about 64 years, S/o Late Mahesh Ram Kurre, Retired Head Master, R/o Village Temar, Sakti Tahsil Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Weifare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) Joint Director, Treasury, Account & Pension, Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Jashpur(C.G.) Block Education Officer, Manora, DisttJashpur(C.G.) •^- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE TTT/^TT /^<^TTT*nL-<-ka~1 <~ITTTT i aciatm^-3 A TT^TCT -IFk^T » <-~i-^.-^-r-^. .<s" ^v /^ W"y.,s&^ '•^-six.ss^y XI-HC—78 'S^! •^fiW^, ESrtl'y'lfi, [s)MI'H^< .......U'.e:.jU?.l..W>.-....3-7.^:S sn^T iT5R>- ('tjcit^^q) sn^i^iTl^iNT twrsn^iaflh; TCnw^ftgsn^r S.B.:HOH'BLE; JUSTICB MR. PRlTIBniBRDIWAKER 14.07.2011 Shri K.S.Pawar, couasel &>r Shri Yashwaut Singh Thak4r, Dy. A.G. for fhc StatB. Counsel for tfae petitioner entitled to secoad Kranwnnati as| and 11.1.2010 (Aunexiu-es P/3 £( years of scrvice. He subinits th^.t tfae issue iavolved fai fhe present petition has already bee^i considered and decUed by this Court iu fhe niatter of R.S. }/^rma V. State of Chhattisgarh and Others (W.P. No. 2805/2002) 29.8.2006, He further submits granted Uberty to uiake a represei the petitioner in ffae liaht of tbe iudgmcat passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court m the iaa1] Others V. K.K.Roy (2004 SCVi^ R.S.Verma (supra) to which respondent/State has no objectio^ Accordiagfy, Itberty soug] graated to make a representatioi^ OflGcer withia a period of three ^eeks Ironi today and in tum fhe said aufhoritv will decide withln a ftuftier period of fhree m| In view of above, fhe pet(tion is disposed of with thc aforesaki Uberty. ^i^d^ ^ii^^f ^f 'f^e? ^ sffin sii^r the peti.ti.oaer. ubmits fhat fhe petitioner is per circular dated 3,10.2008 P/4) after coinpletion of 24 by judgment aad order dated fhat the petitioner inay be itation to consider the case of ter of Sfatte ef Trifmra. Ss ^lj aad fhe order passed in leamed counsel for the t for by the petttioiicr is before fhe Distnct Education the representatioa so inade anths. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ^. l' y