IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Misc. Application No. 3395 In Review Application No. 277 of 2006 (Writ Petition No. 752 of 2008 (M/S)) Shree Sidhbali Steels Ltd. (A company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956) through its Accounts Manager, Sh. Sandeep Maheshwari, Village Jeevanandpur, Tehsil Kotdwar, Distt. Pauri Garhwal. …… Petitioner. Versus The Joint Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Commerce & Industry Deptt. Of Industrial Policy & Promotion, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi and four others. … Respondents. Sri Alok Singh, Senior Advocate, with Sri G.Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner-applicant. Sri Arvind Vashist, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India, for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Sri Rahul Consul, holding brief of Sri Vipul Sharma, learned counsel for the SIDCUL. Date May 09, 2008. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard Sri Alok Singh, Senior Advocate, with Sri G.Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner-applicant, Sri Arvind Vashist, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India, counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Rahul Consul, holding brief of Sri Vipul Sharma, learned counsel for the SIDCUL and perused the record. A perusal of the record shows that earlier the Writ Petition No. 624 of 2005 (M/B) was disposed of by Division Bench of this Court consisting of Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.C.Verma and Justice B.S.Verma (myself) vide order dated 10-8-2006. Subsequent to that, Review applications were filed in some writ petitions including Review Application No. 277 of 2006 in Writ Petition No. 624(M/B) of 2005, which were decided by the Division Bench of this Court consisting of Hon’ble Mr. Justice 2 P.C.Verma and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Veer by a common order dated 19-12-2006 along with a number of Writ Petitions. Aggrieved by the said order dated 19-12-2006, the petitioner-applicant preferred Civil Appeal No. 4643 of 2007 (arising out of SLP(C) No. 10103 of 2007) Sri Sidhbali Steels Ltd. Vs. Secretary and others, before the Hon’ble Apex Court. The Apex Court vide order dated October 3, 2007 has set aside the impugned order dated 19-12-2006 passed in Review Application No. 277 of 2006, which was moved in Writ Petition No. 624 of 2005 (presently renumbered as Writ Petition No. 752 of 2008(M/S) and remitted the matter to this Court for consideration thereof afresh. It was also observed that “we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the matter.” The Apex Court has also observed as under:- “We would, however, request the High Court to consider the desirability of disposing of the matter as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order.” In view of the order passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court, now the review application has to be heard afresh. The paper book of the Writ Petition No. 624 (M/B) of 2005 (renumbered as WPMS No. 752 of 2008) be placed before Hon’ble the Chief Justice for appropriate orders/to constitute the Bench. ( B.S.Verma, J. ) RCP 3 4