WP(C) 2569/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. JC Gaur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. HM Phukan, learne d State counsel appearing for all the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that though pursuant to the Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) dated 22nd February, 2011, the petitioner al ongwith some other persons submitted their bids, but there is a move of settleme nt with M/s Narayani Trading Company, though the tender paper submitted by the s aid tenderer was defective. No decision till date has been taken by the respondent authorities to settle the work in favour of the said party. That apart, the said tenderer is not a party in the present proceeding. The petition is, therefore, premature and not maint ainable and hence dismissed. It would, however, not preclude the petitioner from approaching this Court, in t he event he is aggrieved by any work order that may be issued in favour of any p arty pursuant to the said tender notice dated 22nd February, 2011.