(/9 (\CC}: C. V u—_—--__—_—-——___-. __ ——__- ———_-_————_-__- Elf THE HIGH COURT 0F_CHI3ATTIS§ARH AT BILA$PUR Writ _______________ Pgtition N0_L °__'_.._-£299.l.‘ .E‘Z‘a PETITIONER :I/ S,Bharpur Singh Grewal son of lat S.Ka1.'tar Singh, aged about 7O years, .v“(B-22, New Bombay Market, G.E¢Road, , Nil (Senior Citizen) P Wig Raipur (c.G.) ,'”w:/5b Occupation inf irm . RESPONDENTS .' (w State of Chhattisgarh Through z Chief Secretary, GOVt. of Chhattisgarh , Raipur . (2) Collector, Bastar, Jagdalpur (C.G.). WRIT pETITIoN UNDER ARTICLwEs 226/227 OF THE caN3TITUTION OF mDIA : M“ e \ ? ‘V:€"gf$y:g' 2W“ Shri V..Pandey learn co Shri auta Badun' len Sta. te Heard. In stead o eering into th rival contentions t aars that i M.P. State Miority Commissi 30.11.2001 directing te hief S decid the matter at givin 0 being heard, i Would be fair f incumbent upon the State auth erit. hile doing so the petition he whes to say before the Stat It is contended that the pet ex sericemen were given land However, sometime during the e the writ etitioner a in jail the l to be cancelled by respondentn released he wanted to fie an o he o nfortunatel no such co Was sel for th etitioner. :n e p overnmt advocate for the d Gen details and o merits of the f nt e view o the sttement that the ‘had issued a direction on crery of th Gernent to ortty to the petitioner of this COurt to say tht it is ty to exaine the matter on shall be aowed to say at sr ll wh thority. oner and hisfather w were . ts in 1968 ( 10 acres each ).‘ ergency eriod in 1975 ile e in respect of the land came 2. fter e petitoner was peal and in thi regard he rquested for certified true copy i g approache .P. tate Minori ommisson. As statd aoileREW a I r .p s f t order f cancellation. ssued to him. At lon last he d M S ty Ci e b 11.12.2001 K ed v Gm h are i als i ppe n n m h C t e fer g 1 t o or m W e is e au i‘ v gra 3 n p ws e ) A th i r l c e Uy, py , i f a 1 :ta' e ovm lpuni r a i m gi ho E'n l p wh as l 92‘1- 3 WWW&W§W § cE WEfai - <w mmmwféa ¢mm 1 1 > Flirection was issued for eXaminingr the matter on merit. As nothing has been done 1n accordance With t ‘ dlreetions issued by the Mlnorlty oommissmn the petitioner has ap cached this Court seeking necessary direction to be issued to the Sta e authority to dec1de the matter on merit. Mr.Gautam Bhaduri learne GA prays for time to file reply. I am ofthe View that nce some direction has already bee 7 it ‘ssued,the State authority may exa mine the matter. In the meantime, ii ms been stated that the father ofthe petitioner died in December 1975. in my view it will be fair that such matter is given priority. .l . In the result, this pe n is disposed of with a direction ":hat the case of the writ peitioner shall be decided by the oommissmner commissmner Bastar Reverge WithirmS Bastar ays The from ieqtitioner today togethej Shall a approach copy of (W his order and on receipt of the same the Commisswner Revenue Z astar, shall proceed to dec1de the matter after giVing an opportunity/jf eing heard to the writ petitioner within a further period of not later 'han 3 months. The petition is accord' GRJ~FS/Z a ‘ RP/ ! 2001+ [,0 C1, Clot» .' _ ‘ ? aa>¥rm fi§aBé¥1 mmW< t o i