// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8646/2006 M/s. Berger Paints, Jaipur Versus Ambrish Sharma S/o late Shri Ram Dayal Sharma and Another Date of Order ::: 11.08.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Dheeraj Tripathi, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears from the contents of the writ petition and the annexed documents that the plaintiff-respondent No.1 filed a suit for eviction in respect of rented premises which was decreed vide judgment and decree dated 10th October, 2001; the decree-holder filed an application for execution and in that execution petition the judgment-debtor/petitioner filed an application under Section 151 CPC for staying execution proceedings. The trial court rejected the said application vide impugned order dated 17th October, 2006. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the // 2 // reasons assigned by the trial court for rejecting the application and, after considering the same, I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the said order so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//