^,&,. SBW L^ AO/ -"•/''^rr'^"'>--~-~/'-'K^y~^-^*-AJ''-•r'v'''/V-^-'''' •--L^^-Lru^r^-';"- BST THEHIGHCOURTOF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No./^' /2010 (in FA(M) No. 70^007,disposedoffon 16-02-2010) ^' ^ Applicant: ^. ,\ ^, ,*. |AMI'"<) ^NiranjanKhalkho S/oPrem '^^^•^[^^S^'1' y ^ Prak^h v^^ s \n " : v^»« .** • . Non-AppIieant _^i^a«<it^J)^ ^ • • ^ Prakash Khalkho, Age54years, R/o Deepka Colony.Qta-.No. M/634, TahsU Katghora, District Korba, C.G.State .VERSUS 1. Shalene Khalkho W/o Niianjan khalkho, Teacher in Chhatdsgarh Public School, R/o Village Jhabar, Bashahat, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba Dlusis Ekka ,S/o M.Ekka, aged about 36 years, R/o Deepka Colony, TahsilKatghora, DistrictKorba. APPLICATION UNDERARTICLE 134-A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF [INDIA READ WIRHSECTION 56 OF THE DIVORCE ACT.1869 EORA GERTIFIGATEOFFITNESSFORAPPEALTOTHEHON'BLESUPREME COURTOEINDIA ^IMI^OURttSFeMMABTISGARH.BII-ASRUR Misc. Givil Gas6 No.156 of 2010 %l?P!-iCANTy: (Respondent N6.1) NON-APPLICANTS/: (Appellant) ^. :^"s Niranjan KMalkho S/o Prem Prakash Khalkho, Age 54 years, R/o Deepka edlony, Qtr.No-M/634, Tahsil, Katgliora, Distt. Korba, C.G. State Versus 1. Shalene Khalkho W/o Niranjan khalkhb, Teacher jn CHhattisgarh Public School, R/o Village Jhabar, Bashahat, Tahsil Katghora, Distt. Korba 2. lllusis Ekka, S/o M. Ekka, aged about 36 years, R/o Deepka Colony, Tahsil Katghora, Distt.Korba. {ApplicationunderArticle134-AoffheConstitutionoflndiareadwithSectipn56of tl-ieDivorceAct,1869foraeertifiGateoffitnessfoFappealtotheHon'bleSupreme COurtoflndia} Present; Mr. Djlman Rati Minj with Mr. Sudeep Verma, eounsel fcir the applicant. ^; Soma^ Division^ench:- s Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharmaand Hori'bleMr. R.N. Chandrakar,JJ , ORALORDER (6-5-2010), 1. This is an application under Article134A of the Constitution of India read with Section 56 of the Divorpe Act, 1869 for certifieate of fitness for appeal to the SupremeCourt oflndia. 2; VVe have heard leamed couhsel for the applicant, perused the application, judgment&decreedated 16-2-2010 passed byusinF.A,(M)No.70/2007and the substantialquestion oflawproposedon behalfoftheapplicant. 3. Adrftittedly, we have not propbsed for grant of certificate under Article 1 34A (a) of the Constitution of India. Tlle applicant herein lias also not made anyoral applieation immediately after the passing 6r making of the judgment. Thi® alleged ground i.e. dissolution of rnarriage 6n the ground of irretrievable break down is not available to the Hindus under Section 13(1) ofthe Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. 4. Consequently, we do not find any case for grant of certifieateunder Article 134A (b) of the Constitution of India. The appljcation is, therefore, liable to be djsmissed and it is hereby dismissed, in limine. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge Sdf- R.N.Chandrakar Judge