(S) IN THE HIGH CQURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS.) N0.^7;^t/2010 ^ PETITIONER 4^^s^ ^•^ Ramkumar Naik S/o Shri Minketan Naik, Aged about 51 years, Occupation Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Baigindih, 'Block Baramkela, District : Raigarh (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. .^ 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, School Educatonal Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur District -Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3.. Block Education OfGcer, Block Baramkela, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. 1 SlI^i^iT I^IRTSII^T WRR?'aftd ^er -iii*4ici^, ^ifly'iio, fawi+iy ^..S..1S..C^^^ DTWfF ShflW an^i ^giw(to S.B.: HON'BLB JUSTICK MR. P: 15-12-2010 Shri D.R.Patel. counsellbil ShriAjit Smgh, P.L. for fb^ Grievauce of fhe petitioneit the pctitioner was iaitially appoiti in fh.e School Education depart4ient he is entifled for two advance in<] been given to liim. Counsel for the petitioner do.ae his B.Ed. on 11.04.1997 4 AUaiiabad at his own cost durins entitled for two advance iucrei repi^sentation dated 12.3.200' before the coinpetent aufh.ority woidd be served if he uiav bi petition wiih a direction to TIie fhe pending representation of petitioner subinits this petition IE ia. the matter of Tashwant Kataar ^l^rl'fl'l 414^''? ^yl <fa^l< •^T SlPgq 3D^[ the petitioner. State. ia the present petition.is that ;ted on tiie post of Dy. Teacher on 8.10.1986 aod though renients but fhe same has not •ubmits tliat the petitioner has oin Hindi Sahitya Samiaellau., his service and ffaerefore he is icnts. He subniits fh.at bis (Annexure P/6) is pending ^iid at fhis stage, the purpose permitted to wifhdraw this (sompetent authority to decide ic petitioner. Counsel for fhe squarely covered by fhe order Thje GovS. t?3l State coLti3sel subinlts that jlet fhe petitioaer representation to ttie concemeijl au&ority make a fresh he has 110 J.- [^ '.fe •• 33-HC-22 •v s ^ .^•&r 311^1 qn R-li.d) 311^1 5t>^icti ^S^ ^^ •^l'Mlcf'if, ^Tll'y'l'a, f^wi'yy an^r W^K 111CTI (h*<|ch 200 sn^r'^Riiwdftti pe^iod objection if aay direction is b^ing issued for deciding his representation in accordance wifhl Accordingly, the petitioiier petition wifh Uberiy to m.ake a] aufhority concemed within a date of receipt of copy of this froia tlie autliorities concemed furtlier period of foiir nionths fin accoidaiice with law. It is laade clear that this opmion on inerits of the case t +l'i|I<ll41-f HWvS 4 ^S <fa|*$l< ^; SlfitTtf 3TI^I onler LS pennitted to wifhdraw this fresh representation to the of three weeks' fi-om ttie and ia tum it. is expected :o decide the same within a ^in ttie date of its receipt. in pourt has not expiessed aiiy jind the autboritv concemed would be at Uberty to decide the r^presentation of ftie petitioner strictlv ia accord.ance wifh. law. Sd/- '. Pritinker Diwakar Judge