Patna High Court C.R. No.723 of 2006 (17) dt.27-03-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.723 of 2006 ====================================================== Gautam Singh & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Bhairo Singh .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhukar Singh Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh Mr. Nagendra Rai For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 17 27-03-2012 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners. However, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no.3 is present and submits that the opposite party nos. 18 and 20 have refused to receive the notices, as per the process server’s report and has prayed that the service of notices on these opposite parties may be accepted as valid. The learned counsel for the opposite party no.3 has also pointed out that the order of stay is operating in this case and the opposite party nos. 18 and 20 are not necessary parties for the purpose of this revision application. As such, the notices on opposite party nos. 18 and 20 are accepted as valid, as prayed. .Roy/- (V. Nath, J)