1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION jmi CIVIL APPLICATION NO.64 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.889 OF 2006. Rama Sakharam Kale. ..Applicant/ Org. Appellant. vs. Laxman Gangaram Divate & Ors. ..Respondents/Res.1 to 6 Org.Respondents. .... Ms. Jai V. Kanade, i/b.Mr. G.S. Godbole, for Appellant. Mr. Rahul D. Motkari, for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Nitin Mulye, for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4. Ms. Meera M. Iyer, i/b. Mr. H.E. Palwe, for Respondent No.7. Mr. Sandeep D. Shinde, for Respondent No. 11 & 12. .... CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 6TH NOVEMBER 2009. P.C. By this civil application, the applicant is seeking amendments to second appeal no.889 of 2006 by impleading respondent nos. 7A to 7D and 8 to 12 as party respondent nos. 7A to 7D and 8 to 12, in the said second appeal. It is the case of the applicant that the proposed respondents are proper/ necessary parties, since the suit property has been subsequently sold by the original 2 respondent nos. 1 and 2 to them. 2. In view thereof, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The learned Advocates appearing for the appellant shall carry out necessary amendments within a period of one week from today and shall also forward an amended copy of the appeal to the Advocate appearing for the respondents forthwith. 3. S.O. to 21 st November 2009. [ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]