IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1205 of 2004 (M/S) Jagdish S/o Sri Perumal, R/o Village- Nanheda Anantpur, Tehsil-Roorkee,District Haridwar. …… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttaranchal through Secretary, Co-operative Societies, Dehradun and others. .….. Respondents. Sri Lok Pal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Rajendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5. Sri K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State-respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard Lok Pal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rajendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and Sri K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State-respondent Nos. 1 to 3. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a following reliefs:- i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent No.3 to produce the order dated 22-3-2004 whereby the Administrator was appointed by him and after calling the aforesaid order the same may be quashed. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature certiorari quashing the impugned resolution dated 5-4-2004 passed by the respondent No.5. iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to conduct the 2 election of the Society according to the rules and by-laws of the Society on the basis of list of the members of the Society(contained annexure No.3 to the writ petition). iv) Issue any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, be passed in favour of the petitioner. v) Cost of the petition be awarded in favour of the petitioner. Sri Rajendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 has stated at bar that the petitioner has also challenged the validity of membership of the members who were inducted by the Administrator of the Society on 5-4-2004. The Objections were filed before the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Society. The Deputy Registrar had also cancelled the resolution dated 5-4-2004 and the election had been conducted by the Society on the basis of the list of the old members. Since, the resolution whereby the members were inducted by the Administrator was set aside by the Deputy Registrar. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 that the election had already been conducted by the Co-operative Society excluding the new members, which were inducted by the Administrator, the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. All pending applications stands disposed of. (B.S.Verma, J.) 28-8-2008 M.K. 3