IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4120 of 2010 GOPAL SHARAN SINGH Versus RIPU SUDAN PRASAD SINGH & ORS. ----------- 5. 12.1.2011. Heard Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bipin Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party nos.21, 22, 23, 31 and 39. No one appears on behalf of opposite party no.1. This application has been filed for restoration of Civil Revision No.1247 of 2009, which stood dismissed as against the opposite party nos.3 and 4 for non compliance of the order dated 21.6.2010. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that opposite party no.3 had already died on 17.3.2010 itself. Therefore, no notice was required to be sent to her. However, this fact could not be pointed out by the petitioner at the relevant point of time. Learned counsel submits that I.A. No.8370 of 2010 had been filed in this regard in Civil Revision No.1247 of 2009. On being satisfied with the reasons furnished in this application, it appears that the petitioner was prevented from sufficient cause for non-compliance of the order dated 2 21.06.2010. As a result, this application is allowed and the Civil Revision No.1247 of 2009 is restored to its original file and number subject to the condition that the order dated 21.6.2010, so far as it relates to the opposite party no.4, is complied with within two weeks from today if already not been complied. So far as opposite party no.3 is concerned, no notice is required to be sent as she had already died and a petition in this regard had already been filed in the concerned Civil Revision. P.S./Sanjay-II ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)