Cr.MMO No.105 of 2007 29.5.2008. Present: Mr.Rajesh Batra and Mr.Janesh Gupta, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.J.S. Guleria, Law Officer, for respondent No.1. The petitioner has filed the present petition against the summoning order passed by the learned trial Court, dated 2.1.2007, vide which the petitioner was summoned on the application filed by the main accused under Section 20-A of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act for impleading the manufacturer/present petitioner as party. In reply filed by State/respondent No.1, it is conceded that the prosecution was launched wrongly since the notification had not come into effect on the date the sample was taken and, therefore, the learned Law Officer, vide written reply filed by him, concedes that the present petition may be allowed. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and the impugned order, dated 2.1.2007, passed by the learned trial Court summoning the petitioner as accused in the case pending before it, is set aside. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. In view of the final disposal of the main petition, all the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. May 29, 2008. (V.K. Ahuja), (TILAK) Judge.