c^•-: !N_THE,HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ^ WRITP.ETITIONNO, -l-?-^B ./2(Hi3 PETmONERS 1. ^.....^^' ^^'^T. y ^l--\>yv/V / ^ssy ..^^^ t-<>.X-<\" 1<^" ^ •I) Brijesh Kumar Gupta, S/o Late Sfari R.S^Gupta, ag&d 33 vears. Occiipatioii-SerYi^e (Part time Leaturerh R/o Thaiia Road, Batuli. District Sarguja (C.G.). •Saiitosh Komar Siiigh, S/o Shri Ram Badan Singh, aged 35 y^ars, Occupaiion-Service (Part tim.e Lectiirer), R/o Mahuva Para, Ambikapiir District Sarguja Himaiishu Shrivastava, S/o Shri S.S.Shrivastav^, aged 36 yeai's, Occtipat'ioo-Service (Part time Lactiirer), R/o Bhatli Road, Trikon Chowk, Ambikapiir, DistriccSargiija, State ofChhattigaarii throu.gh Secretaiy, Department of ? Manpower Planmng, Maiilralaya. D.K.S.Btiavan, Raipur (C,0.). Dir^ctor, Techiiical Ediication, M^ahila Po.lytecfamc Campus, Baroii Bazar, Raipiir (C.0,)< Priiicipal, Oo^emment Poiytechnic, Ambika(?ur Di^trict "Sarguja (C'.G.). )ER ARTICLE 226/227'OF TME CON8TITUTION OFINDIA FOSi8SUANCE_OF A^UITA.BLE^WRII, ORDER8 OR DIRECTIQN, ^;^ i^ -VERSUS- 1W<^fTWW^ s( U3"ST ^TRT^PT, '^fftTFT^ [®lQli^^< «J^(\/o, /7^^^2 "^ 200 ^I^T ^^T (li?tl<s*^) SRI^i^T'f^iW WT ^fi^T'iW°F I'^A y^n^R ^ft^ ^n^i 16/6/2003 Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Ccj Shri Ranbir Singh, Govt. ^ copy. Counsel for the petitioner|s were iaitially appointed tbr 3 (faereafter on part tmie against they are working for the last 10 However, vide aanexure P-12 tbe Technlcal Education issued adv^ alre^dy which thc pctitioncrs arc Couiisel subniits A fhat iastca appoiiittncnts, thc posts shoiild| appointinents. He however subrctitted inade any representation thereof, Learaed counsel for the have neither filed a represents deraand ofjustice and that this ^p^pj^ ^R^? ^ fe^ <f^l^S< ^^tosn^T lunsel for tfcie petitioners. .dvocate for the State on advance submitted fhat the petitioners inonfhs on contract basis aad saiictioned posts aad as such rears with certam periodical gaps, ttte department of Directorate of rtisemient to ffle up the posts on working on coutract basis, d of laakhig again contract havc bccn advc^tiscd for rcgular that the petitioners have not Sltate subnxits that fh.e petitioners ^tion nor served an.y notice for p^tition is not inaintaiaable. Gt.P' 'o. °3~^T '^TraT^R, '8xilfflre, 1®T^TRTy lAJ./?^fo,/70^/ ^) ^1*1^11 w^e^s •^200 ^^f ^w ('^3^^) SFj^T'3RT'ftFITO ^yrw^T^iT^ ft' l^*-s: I^TT^R ^fN ^¥r Having considered fhe fact^ aad material on record, ia the opijiion will sewe if a direction is given toj representation along-with a copy) aufhoriiy wifhm two weeks firom being filed the competent auttiori^ pedtiouer aiid decide the sauie ^TRta^ ^ tt^ <^^s< ^ ^^ OT^T aad circumstances of the case oftihis Court, ends ofjustice the petitioner to make a detaUed of this order to fhe competeut tjoday aad on such representation ^y shaU hear tfae grievaace of tfae .te^ accordarLce wifb law wifhiQ.^ifi^F^xnonths fi'oiix thc datc of by passiug a it;asoued order iii ^e- rcccipt/production of rcprcscnt4tion. passed aad fhe petitioners th^reby chollenge the said order ia accord^ce With the aforesaid obse^vations, this petition staads disposed of. In view of this order, M.W.H T.A.5003/2003 also stend disposc^ C.C. as perrules. lon. If aiiy advcrsc ordcr is feel aggrieved, fhey xaay wifh law, 1538/03, I.A.No.5002/02 and of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge Gt~.PRJ—FS/7£!— 5/200C -50,000.