IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 7729 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 30th April, 2010. Mohinder Pal Jindal & Anr. Petitioners through Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioners, who retired as Superintendent Grade-I from the office of the Director, Public Instructions [Secondary Education], Punjab, seek a Mandamus to direct the respondents to implement the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ajit Singh Janjua v State of Punjab, [1996] 2 SCC, 215 and Ajit Singh Janjua-II v State of Punjab [1999[7] SCC, 209 and to grant them consequential benefit of seniority and promotion to the post of Superintendent Grade-I from the due date, i.e., 13.5.1991. In this regard, the petitioners are said to have issued legal notice dated 8.2.2010 [Annexure P-19] but no action has been taken thereon. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to respondent No. 3 to take cognizance of the aforesaid legal notice issued by the petitioners and dispose of the same, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of four months, by passing a speaking order. Disposed of. Dasti. April 30, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE