IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.313 of 2004 Date of Decision: 22.09.2006 Suraj Pal ...Petitioner Vs. Presiding Officer & Anr. ...Respondents CORAM Hon'ble Mr.Justice Vinod K.Sharma Present: Mr.Rajesh Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.M.S.Uppal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Vinod K.Sharma, J. (Oral) Present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 5.5.2003 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Gurgaon vide which the application moved by the Management against the order recalling A.S.Nirvan as witness has been allowed. The reading of the impugned order shows that Shri A.S.Nirvan, Inquiry Officer, was examined as a witness on an issue as to whether the inquiry was fair and proper and the said issue was decided CR 313 of 2004 (2) on 18.7.2000 which order has attained finality. Learned Labour Court, therefore, rightly came to the conclusion that it was not open to the workman now to recall the Inquiry Officer only for the reason that in criminal case the petitioner stands acquitted. There is no error in exercise of jurisdiction by the court below which may call for interference by this Court in revisional jurisdiction. Dismissed. (Vinod K.Sharma) 22.09.2006 Judge rp