(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 409 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 409 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 409 OF 2004 Smt.Usha Mukundrao Acharya & Anr ...Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Ms. Aniketa Aher-Sawant with Mrs. Vinita V. Bakre-Shastry, counsel for Petitioners Mr.S.K. Chincholikar, A.G.P. for Respondents 1 & 2. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 17TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 17TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 17TH FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. From the affidavit in reply filed by Mr. S.V. Patil, Deputy Secretary for the Higher and Technical Education Department, the Government of Maharshtra, it is clear that pursuant to the order dated 15.7.2004 passed in Writ Petition No. 9637 of 2003, the petitioner has been intimated the decision vide letter dated 2.11.2004 and the said decision was the subject matter of challenge in Writ Petition No.9856 of 2004. The said petition was also decided on 23.12.2004 and in pursuance thereof the Government communicated its fresh decision on 30.12.2004. This order also has been challenged in yet another writ petition. (-2-) 2. Under the circumstances, this contempt petition does not survive as at present and hence, the same is disposed of as such.