IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2009 / 14TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 15370 of 2009(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------- NARENDRANATHAN, S/O.C.K.KELAPPAN, KAKKUMMAL HOUSE, KAYANNA BAZAR.P.O., PERAMBRA, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No.15370 of 2009 --------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the holder of a regular stage carriage bearing registration No.KL-18/8686, which is now replaced with KL-56/A 8325, to operate on the route Kuttiadi-Guruvayur. A motion was made by the petitioner for granting him permission to operate a super fast service. Though the Regional Transport Authority rejected the application, the State Transport Appellate Tribunal directed such facility to be granted in relation to his service, provided the vehicle offered by the petitioner is fit for such service, as per Ext.P2 order. According to the petitioner, notwithstanding the fact that Ext.P2 judgment dated 9.12.2008 has been produced before the 1st respondent, further action has not been taken. Hence, the writ petition. 2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. W.P.(C)No.15370 of 2009 :: 2 :: 3. Since the tribunal has taken a decision as per Ext.P2, it is only appropriate that the 1st respondent takes a decision in terms of the judgment, which shall be done within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (V.GIRI) Judge sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge