IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 6429 of 2011 Date of decision August 26, 2011 Gurpinder Singh ....... Petitioner Versus Punjab National Bank and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: Mr. Manish Prabhakar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R. S. Bhatia, Advocate for respondent No.1. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. The issue involved in the writ petition is the tenability on account of enforcement of security in respect of agricultural land. The counsel appearing on behalf of the Bank states that the Bank has withdrawn the proceedings under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and they are in the process of making the recovery under RDB Act. The respondents shall be at liberty to take such recovery proceedings. 2. The writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous in the light of the statement made by the counsel for the Bank. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 26, 2011 archana