mgn CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.8078 OF 2009 Sukdeo Chaturlal Darveshi..Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors....Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court's or Judge's orders appearances,Court 's : orders or directions & : Registrar s orders . : Mr.R.K. Mendadkar, for the Petitioner Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1,4 and 5. Mr. P.S. Dani, for Respondent NO.3. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA,JJ. DATED : 23rd November, 2009. P.C.: The grievance of the petitioner is that he has preferred a Revision before the Respondent No.4. The matter has been heard, but till date the order has not been passed. 2. The respondent Nos. 1,4 and 5 have filed reply in which it is set out that on account of subsequent events the decision has to be taken by the Vasai Virar Municipal Corporation. 3. The issue is the pending Revision Application. The Respondent No.4 must take a decision as to whether the Revision is maintainable and/or has to be allowed and/or dismissed. The fact that on account of some subsequent events the matter has to be heard by some other authority without an order being passed by an authority exercising quasi judicial proceedings rendered the proceedings non-existing. Hence the Respondent No.4 is directed to take a decision and communicate the decision to the petitioner at any rate not later than eight weeks from today. 4. With the above observation Writ Petition disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)