IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND SIX P R E S E N T THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH * * * WP.No.1918 OF 2006 Between: Ssmt.Sannilla Yadamma … Petitioner Versus The Govt. of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & Ors. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.M.Rajamala Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Revenue O R D E R : Seeking a mandamus, declaring the action of the second respondent in not receiving the document and registering the same in respect of the agricultural land in survey no.375 to an extent of Ac:0-24 guntas, situated at Kangara Khurd-A village, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy district, as illegal and arbitrary, the present writ petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. It is stated that the petitioner is the absolute owner of the land mentioned in the writ petition and she has been in possession and enjoyment of the same and the revenue authorities have also recognized his title and possession and issued pattedar passbook and title deed in respect of the said land. It is further stated that the first respondent, vide his proceedings in LR.WP/Tort/2004 dated 04-9-2004 directed the second respondent not to register any sale transactions of the list of survey numbers annexed to the proceedings, in which survey no.375 is also mentioned. The learned Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, submitted that the Government has not issued any notification under section 22-A (1) of the Registration Act, prohibiting the registration of the documents in respect of the lands in question. On issuance of such notification, the second respondent can refuse to receive the documents for registration, but not as other wise. In view of the same, the second respondent is hereby directed to receive the document and register the same as and when the petitioner presented the same for registration, and for any reason, if the document cannot be registered, he has to pass appropriate orders and communicate the same to the petitioner, within two weeks from the date of presentation of the said document. With the above observations, the writ petition is allowed. No order as to costs. FEBRUARY 1st, 2005. ------------------------ I s L. V. ESWARAIAH, J.