IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2009 / 28TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 23663 of 2009(C) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- K.M.NAZEER HUSSAIN,S/O. KUNHARAMMU, AGED 51 YEARS,VELLAKULAM HOUSE, P.O. PERIMBALAM VIA MUNDUPARAMBA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.MR.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL SMT.AMBIKA RADHAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. 2. M.MADHAVAN NAIR, JAYASREE, CALICUT ROAD, MANJERI. BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = W.P.(C). No. 23663 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = Dated this the 19th day of August 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner is the registered owner of a Stage Carriage bearing registration No. KL-10/Q-4400, which operates with a regular permit on the route Palakkad-Kohikode touching Manjeri. The second respondent is operating his Stage Carriage on the route Kozhikode-Palakkad. His timings were settled as per Ext.P1. But later he applied for a revision of his own timings which was granted under Ext.P2. Ext.P2 was challenged by the petitioner in M.V.A.R.P.No.254/08 before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Ernakulam. The Tribunal as per Ext.P3 set aside the order passed by the Secretary, R.T.A. and directed a resettlement of the timings. Petitioner's grievance arises out of the fact that though Ext.P3 order is dated 07.11.2008, the respondent has not taken further consequential action. Hence the writ petition. 2. Since the Tribunal has directed resettlement of the timings of the second respondent as early as on 07.11.2008, the W.P.(C). No. 23663 OF 2009 2 respondent is bound to take further action, within a reasonable period. That has not been done. 3. I heard the learned Government Pleader also. 4. The writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to take further action pursuant to Ext.P3 order of the Tribunal and resettle the timings of the service of the second respondent as early as possible, at any rate within 2 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after notice to the second respondent and other affected persons. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (V.GIRI) JUDGE kkms/