IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30155 of 2011 1. Ram Padarath Rawat, Son of Late Bhaglu Raut, 2. Suresh Rawat 3. Dinesh Rawat 4. Parash Rawat, All sons of Ram Padarath Rawat, resident of village-Dhamoun, Uttari, P.S.-Patory, District-Samastipur. Versus The State of Bihar ----------- 2. 09.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with a case in which finding a prima facie case cognizance has been taken for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 341, 385, 406, 418, 427 & 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that apart from Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code all other sections are bailable in nature and from the allegations made in the complaint itself, it would transpire that the ingredients of offence under Section 406 of the IPC are not attracted as the allegation is that the complainant had paid Rs. 15,000/- as loan, which amount on demand was not returned. The dispute, if any, would be a dispute of civil nature. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, namely, (i) Ram Padarath Rawat, (ii) Suresh Rawat, (iii) Dinesh Rawat and (iv) Parash Rawat in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand only) with 2 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Samastipur in connection with C.R. Case No. 550 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Sanjeet (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)