IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 463 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 463 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 463 OF 2009 Shoeb Samiuddin Khan ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Vinod H. Wagh for the Applicant. Mr.Rajesh More, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 3, 2009 DATED : FEBRUARY 3, 2009 DATED : FEBRUARY 3, 2009 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard Counsel for the applicant and APP for the State. 2. The applicant apprehends arrest in connection with an offence registered vide C.R.No.272/2007 for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 225, 324, 326, 332, 333, 342, 336, 427 of the IPC. 3. The applicant’s name has been mentioned by one of the witnesses. It is alleged that he was throwing stones on the police officers and damaged the police vehicles. - 2 - 4. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant’s name has not been mentioned in the FIR but he later on learnt, after the charge-sheet is filed, that one of the witnesses has named him in his statement. He submitted that all other accused have been released on bail. 5. In my view, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail since the applicant’s name is mentioned by one of the witnesses. Specific role is attributed to him. The applicant may apply for regular bail. 6. The application for anticipatory bail is rejected. If an application for regular bail is filed by the applicant, the same be decided, expeditiously. (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)