IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.20037 of 2011 Date of decision: 31.10.2011 Gurvinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. S.K. Sud, Advocate for the petitioner. Rajan Gupta, J (oral). Only claim of the petitioner is for release of annual proficiency increments due after 8 and 16 years with consequential benefits. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment of this court in CWP No.18115 of 1991. He submits that a legal notice/representation, Annexure P-4 and reminder, Annexure P-5 were served by the petitioner but no decision was taken thereon. Notice of motion. On asking of the court, Mr. B.S. Chahal, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice. He submits that he has no objection if a direction is issued for decision of the legal notice. In view of above, it is directed that decision on the legal notice, Annexure P-4, served by the petitioner, be taken expeditiously, preferably within a period of six month. Disposed of. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 31.10.2011 'rajpal'