1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 53 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 601 OF 2005 Vimla Bhasker Karkera ....Plaintiff Versus Yeshwant Waman Patil & Ors. ....Defendants Mr. Rajendra Rathod, Advocate for the Plaintiff. Mr. Uday Shelke i/b. M/s. Shelke & Co., Advocates for the Defendants. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : 9th FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C. : The present chamber summons is taken out by the Plaintiff for permission to carry out consequential amendment as per the schedule annexed thereto. The proposed amendment is not contradictory or inconsistent to the averments made in the plaint. In that view of the matter and especially in the light of provisions of section 153 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 coupled with the reasons given in the affidavit in support, the chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 2 2. Necessary amendments be carried out by the Plaintiff within a period of two weeks. 3. At the request of the learned Counsel for the Defendant, this order shall not come into effect for a period of three weeks from today. (R. V. MORE, J.)