IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 447 OF 2006. PETITION NO. 447 OF 2006. PETITION NO. 447 OF 2006. Bhikaji R. Jadhav ... Petitioner. V/s. Laxmibai G. Jadhav & ors. ... Respondents. None for the petitioner. None for the respondents. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 29.1.2007. DATED: 29.1.2007. DATED: 29.1.2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . None for the petitioner even at second call. Petition is liable to be dismissed for want of prosecution. 2. The dismissal of the petition in default results in moving an application for restoration which creats huge strain on the registry . 3. In the above view of the matter, I myself went through the impugned order together with challenges raised in the writ petition and perused other material on record. 4. Having gone through the petition, I do not see any case having been made out by the petitioner to entertain this petition. The view [ 2 } taken by the Courts below is a reasonable and possible view . 5. In the result, petition is, thus, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)