1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE Civil Writ Petition No.2715 of 2006 Ratan Shankar Rathod Petitioner Vs. The Office of the Tahsildar and ors. Respondents None for the parties. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & S.R.SATHE, JJ. April 23, 2007. P.C. . None for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has addressed a letter to the office of the Tahsildar near Mulund Commerce College. The said office is the office of Tahsildar, Kurla. The notice appears to have been received by the said office on 22nd March 2006 and it seeks certain information. As per the petitioner inspite of the reminders the said information has not been received by him. . If that be so, the petitioner’s remedy is before the concerned Information Officer, Chief Information Officer or the Information Commissioner as the case may be, under the Right to Information Act, 2005. 2 . Hence the petition is disposed by relegating the petitioner to the alternative remedy of approaching to the concerned authorities of the State Government under the Right to Information Act, 2005. (S.R.SATHE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)