< IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION (227) N0. l£S^ OF 2010 FS.B.1 PETITIONERS Applicants y ^ 1^^t ^y ,^'r ^?' ,s>' ../' .c"\ ^ ' RESPONDENTS Non Applicants 1; J^M.^tel^'l >v. ''/^/ T-4^-_ ''s&.'y \y'^~j^:siy Rengai LalS/o.Jokhan aged about 54 years, Suraj S/o. late Shri Shiv kumar Aged about 11 years, Deepak S/o. late Shri Shiv kumar Aged about 10 years, Petitioner no. 2 to 3 Thourgh : - Rengai lal S/o. Jokhan aged about 54 years (Petitioner No.l), All are Residence of Village post Gurasia Via Pondi-Uproda Tahsil Katghora, District Korba (C.G.). VERSUS Sapuran Lal S/o. Ramesh lal Chouhan, aged about 32 years R/o. Bandha para police station Bango District Korba (C.G.) Vinod Barde S/o. M.G. Barde, M.I.G. 118 R.P. Nagar Korba District Korba (C.G.). National Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Divisional manager Divisional office 13 Meenu complex Main Road Kosabadi Korba District Korba (C.G.). WRItPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ ^'ov \"\ ^SET ^nqRTO, ^Tily'i^, r»<di-9^< ^..^..tfe?t)..!.6.^^.te. an^iTnqT(Tpf3^q: SB : Hon'ble Shri ManJndraMahan Sh 15-04-2010 amtaunt Shri Praveen Tuteyan, counsel foij l-1eard on admisston. This petition under Article 227 cS, assailing legality and validity of order petitioner's application for release of Impugned order has been passed on placed by the petitioner to justjfy prayer) under deposit. Leamed Court below whj consideration relevant circumstances n^, report bythe local authority, photographs) tn fte opinion of this Court; ther^ the finding ofthe tearned Court below inj has failed to make out a case for The petition js therefore dismissetl open for the petitioner to apply with rele'ij to establish his claim for release releaselofan ofamouhtofhis <<iwl<'i4)'< ^WvS *f ft^t <I^]^K ^TsjfOTan^i h?astava.>). the petjtjoner. the Constitution of India has been filed cjated 26/10/09 (Annexure P-2) by which ofRs.1,50,000/- has been rejected. jonsideration that no material has been |for release of a part of amount of claim |le arriving at such findjng has taken into jmely non submission of any inspection estimate etc. is no jurisdictionat error or per/ersity in arming at the conclusjon that applicant amount of Rs. 1,50.000/-. It is however made ctear that it will be tant material, documentary/oral evidence stated need. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge WH^i ^•^y'S^r?1'". -•^-i<;;IT4—FS/I47—2/2010—1,00,000.