IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 5TH MARCH 2010 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1931 RPFC.No. 425 of 2007() --------------------------------- MC.693/2006 of THE FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM .................... (S): REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT -------------------------------------------------- BIJU EAPPAN, 35 YEARS, S/O EAPPAN @ KUNHIMON, MANNIL VEEDU, POTHUKAL, BUTHANAM P.O., CHUNKATHARA, NILAMBUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.MR.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS -------------------------- 1. ALICE, AGED 31 YEARS, D/O GEORGE, MULLANAM KUZHIYIL VEEDU, KOTTAPPADAM, CHUNKATHARA P.O., NILAMBUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. AJIN, AGED 5 YEARS(MINOR), S/O BIJU EAPPAN, REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER ALICE,(1ST RESPONDENT) BY ADV. MR.BIJU .C. ABRAHAM THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON CRL.M.A. NO.10801/2007 IN RPFC. NO.425/2007 DISMISSED 05/03/2010 SD/- M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss M.N.KRISHNAN,J. ====================== R.P.(F.C) No. 425 OF 2007 ====================== Dated this the 5th day of March 2010. JUDGMENT Parties have settled the matter and learned counsel appearing for both sides submit that as per Clause 6 of the affidavit filed for the purpose of compromise “the second party has no objection in allowing the revision petition pending before the Hon'ble High Court as R.P.(F.C). No.425/07 by quashing the order for maintenance awarded in view of the settlement.” In the light of the submission by the learned counsel for the parties and from the copy of the same made available to me, I am inclined to accept the same and set aside the order of maintenance. Therefore the order in the maintenance case is set aside and the revision petition is allowed and M.C will stand dismissed. M.N.KRISHNAN,JUDGE. mns