1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO.1419 OF 2009 Mohd. Yusuf Behlim. ...Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondent. .... Mr.Rajesh N. Kachare for the Petitioner. Mr.Milind More, AGP for Respondent Nos.a and 3. Mr.R.A. Lokhande i/b. Mr. D.A. Nalavade for Respondent No.2. Mr.Anil Mishra for Respondent No.4. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. December 18, 2009. P.C. At the hearing of the Petition, Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and the Fourth Respondent have agreed to the following arrangement and consequently, the following order being passed by consent of parties and without further recording of reasons : -(i) The Fourth Respondent shall provide to the Petitinerpermanent alternate accommodation admeasuring 286 sq.ft., in terms of supplementary annexure II (Exh.A1 to the Petition) and 2 the decision of the High Powered Committee, on Plot No.D; -(ii) The commercial tenement shall be handed over to the Petitioner, fit in all respects for occupation, in any event on or before 31st December 2011. In the meantime, until permanent alternate accommodation is handed over, the Fourth Respondent shall provide to the Petitioner, transit commercial accommodation, Gala No.11, in Building ‘B’. For the purpose of identification, the Plan of the premises has been placed on the record, duly initialed by Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Counsel appearing on behalf of the Fourth Respondent. The transit accommodation shall be provided within a period of two weeks from today; -(iii) The permanent alternate accommodation shall be provided on the front side of the building. Since the aforesaid order has been passed by the consent of the Advocates and there has been no further relief sought, the Petition is disposed of. ....