IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14618 of 2009 SHYAM PRASAD SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 17.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was placed under suspension and departmental proceedings initiated. The enquiry has been completed and a second show cause notice issued on 12.11.2008, which is sought to be presently assailed as being violative of the proceedings under Rule 17 of the Bihar C.C.A. Rules, 2005. The petitioner is acknowledged to have submitted his reply to the second show cause notice. Counsel for the State submits that all procedural requirements of Rule 17 of the Bihar C.C.A. Rules, 2005 shall be complied with. At this stage, the writ application appears to be premature. There is no occasion for this Court to interfere in an inconclusive departmental proceeding. The writ application is disposed with the observation that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the final orders of punishment, it is always open for him to approach this Court. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)