- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7648/2008 Vishwambhar Ramkrushna Huljute. ...Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents... ..... Shri V.P. Kadam, Advocate for petitioner. Shri N.B. Patil, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. ..... CORAM: V.C.DAGA & A.V. POTDAR,JJ. DATE: 10.07.2009 PER COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The two grievances are being made in the petition. One, that because of the flood, the petitioner suffered damages. Secondly, under the Land Acquisition Act, he did not get compensation. - 2 - So far as first claim is concerned, writ jurisdiction can not be invoked. It would be open for the petitioner to approach appropriate civil Court. So far as second grievance is concerned, the petitioner may approach the Collector within 15 days from today. In the event of such approach, the Collector to decide the same within one month from the date of receipt of such representation by a reasoned order following principles of natural justice. With these observations, the petition is dismissed keeping all contentions of the petitioner open. No order as to costs. (A.V. Potdar,J.) (V.C. Daga, J.) ndk/c1070912