IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16827 of 2011 Anjani Kumar S/o Santosh Kumar. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 04.07.2011. Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner bringing this fact that some of the beneficiaries have already sworn affidavit to this fact that they had received any amount from the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State. Allegedly, petitioner was working as field agent in the company of the informant and he defalcated amount of Rs. 2,16,320/- and he did not distribute the aforesaid amount among the beneficiaries. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that in course of investigation some witnesses have stated that they had not received any amount from the petitioner whereas some witnesses have stated before the Investigating Officer that they had received some amount from the petitioner though subsequently a petition said to be signed by the aforesaid witnesses was filed before 2 Superintendent of Police, Rohtas. Although, learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer but considering the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 649 of 2009. Ibrar/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)