IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.479 of 2005 SHYAM SUNDARI DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4. 4.8.2008. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. This application for revision has been filed against the order of acquittal passed by Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, Ara in Sessions Trial No.150 of 2001. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the court below has not properly appreciated the oral evidence as well as the medical evidence. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the opposite party submitted that on mere perusal of the impugned judgment, it would appear that evidence of the witnesses are full of contradiction and inconsistency. The medical evidence also does not support the prosecution story. The I.O. also did not find any blood at the place of occurrence. Considered the submission of the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the impugned judgment. On perusal of paragraph-6 of the judgment, it is quite apparent that - 2 - N.H./ the injury found on the person of the victim completely demolishes the prosecution story. The court below has rightly acquitted the opposite parties. In view of the ground mentioned in judgment for acquittal, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the impugned judgment. In the result, this application is dismissed at the admission stage. ( Ghanshyam Prasad )