IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 5th day of August 2002 Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.755 of 2002 Order on the Bail Application of the accused- Raju S/o Tejpal and Shyam Singh S/o Balla, both R/o Village Mandlana, P.S. Manglaur district Haridwar CRIMINAL SIDE Raju S/o Tejpal and Shyam Singh S/o Balla, both R/o Village Mandlana, P.S. Manglaur district Haridwar …………..…..Accused State of Uttaranchal. Versus …………..…Opposite Party. Arising out of Case Crime No. 192 of 2002 Under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangaster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Police Station- Manglaur district Haridwar By the Court Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. The accused Raju was involved in three criminal cases in which he has been granted bail. Accused Shyam Singh was involved in two criminal cases in which he was admitted to bail. Considering this, it is a fit case for bail. There are reasonable grounds to believe at this stage that they will no indulge in similar activity if released on bail. Let the accused applicants Raju S/o Tejpal and Shyam Singh S/o Balla, both R/o Village Mandlana, P.S. Manglaur district Haridwar be released on bail in case crime no. 192 of 2002 Under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangaster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Police Station-Manglaur district Haridwar on each of them executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the s satisfaction of Special Judge, Haridwar. (Irshad Hussain, J.) August 05, 2002. M.P.S.