hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2354 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3787 OF 2005 Ramesh Dahilaj Rai Gaba ... Petitioner Versus Gohindham Charitable Trust ... Respondent Mr. Ashok Tajane, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.H. Keluskar, for respondent no. 1. CORAM : A.S. OKA,J. DATED : NOVEMBER 17, 2011 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for first respondent. In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer Clauses (a) and (b) subject to the condition that bhatta will be paid within the period of four weeks from today. 1 hvn This court has issued specific directions to the Registry that the names of the practicing advocates who have been elevated as Judges of this Court should not be shown on the cause list. The Registrar, (Judl. I) has already issued necessary directions in this behalf. Notwithstanding the said direction, the name of an advocate who has been elevated as a learned Judge of this Court has been shown in the cause list. The Registrar (Judl. I) shall look into the matter and shall again issue fresh directions to ensure that such mistake is not repeated. (A.S. OKA,J.) 2