IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 25TH OCTOBER 2011 / 3RD KARTHIKA 1933 RP.No. 760 of 2011 IN MFA No.164/2009 ------------------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT dated 16.8.2011 IN MFA.164/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): IST RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------------------------------- RADHAKRISHNA.K., S/O.LATE PUTTOJI RAO, AYARKAD, KOLIKKAJE HOUSE, POST MULLERIA, KASARAGOD. BY ADV. SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR SMT.VANDANA MENON SMT.ANJU P.NAIR RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT & 2ND RESPONDENT: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., KASARAGOD, REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, OMANA BUILDING, M.G.ROAD, KOCHI-35. 2. K.JAYARAMA, S/O.SANJEEVA RAO, BOOPA'S COMPOUND, NEAR SREEKRISHNAN THEATRE, KASARAGOD. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 25/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. ----------------------------------------- R.P.No.760/2011 in M.F.A.No.164/2009 ----------------------------------------- Dated, this the 25th day of October, 2011 O R D E R K.M.Joseph, J. After condoning the delay in filing the review petition we heard the review petition itself. 2. We heard the learned counsel for the review petitioner and learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. This Court had disposed of the appeal filed by the Ist respondent by reducing the loss of earning capacity at 27% and directing that the review petitioner will be entitled to Rs.1,37,240/- with interest as ordered. The review petition is solely premised on Annexure-A produced along with the review petition. It purports to be a certificate for persons with disabilities. It is issued by the Medical Board constituted by the District Medical Officer, Kasargod which is constituted as per GO (P) NO.202/2009/H & FWD Dtd 26.6.09). Therein it is stated that the review petitioner has permanent disability in respect of right hand, Partial Ankylosu Right Elbow. This is not a material which is placed before us. Apparently, it relates to some concessional facilities available for persons with R.P.No.760/2011 -2- disabilities. We have already discussed the evidence and taken a decision. We do not see any ground for review on the basis of the certificate. The Review Petition fails and it is dismissed. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. (M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS) JUDGE. MS.