IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3022 of 2008 1. Sudhir Singh, Ex-Line Man (Elect.) Under Senior S.E., Power House, N.F. Railway, Katihar. 2. Suman Kumar Singh, Son of Shri Sudhir Singh, both resident of Mohalla- Laliyahi, Behind Hanuman Temple, Post-Mill, P.S. Katihar, District-Katihar (Bihar)- ----- Petitioners. Versus 1. The Union of India, through the General Manager, N.F. Railway Maligaon, (Gauhati)). 2. The Chief Personnel Officer, N.F. Railway, Maligaon (Gauhati) 3. The Divisional Railway Manager, N.F. Railway, Katihar. 4. The Divisional Railway Manager (Personnel ) N.F. Railway, Katihar 5. The Senior S.E.E. N.F. Railway, Katihar. 6. The Chief Medical Director, N.F. Railway, Maligaon. 7. The C.M.S., Katihar -------------------- Respondents. ------------ 5. 6.5.2009 Heard Mr. M.P. Dixit for the petitioners. This application has been filed for recall of the order dated 29.9.2008, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 10584 of 2008 (Sudhir Singh & Ors. Vrs. The Union of India & Ors.), whereby the writ petition stood dismissed in default. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners. It appears to us on a perusal of the order-sheet of the writ petition that the matter was taken up by the Division Bench on various dates and the following orders were passed: 5.8.2008- None appeared on behalf of the petitioners and the matter was adjourned for two weeks. 21.8.2008- As prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioners, it was adjourned for one week. 1.9.2008- As prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioners, it was adjourned for one week. 11.9.2008- As prayed for by learned counsel for the 2 petitioners, it was adjourned for two weeks. 26.9.2008- Learned counsel for the petitioners prayed for adjournment. Recapitulating the earlier orders, the case was adjourned for 29.9.2008 with the condition that no request for adjournment shall be entertained on the next date. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners on 29.9.2008, resulting in dismissal of the writ petition. Summary of the order-sheet of the writ petition is adequate to dismiss the present restoration application. It is accordingly rejected. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar ,J. ) (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)