IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION NO : 23635 of 2003 Between: M/s. Maruti Cottex Ltd, Rep. by its Managing Director, A company registered under the Indian companies Act, 1956, Sri Vijay Garg, S/o. Sri Hari Charan Garg, Having its Registered Office at S.No. 257, Choutuppal - 508 252, Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Board for Industrial & Financial Reconstruction, Jawahar Vyapar Bhawan, No.1, Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi - 110 001. 2 The Joint Secretary, Industries Department, Government of A.P., Secretariat, A.P., Hyderabad. 3 The Chairman & Managing Director, State Bank of Hyderabad, Gonfoundry, Hyderabad. 4 The Chairman & Managing Director, Industrial Development Bank of India, IDBI Tower, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai. 5 The Director General, ESIC, ESIC Building, Kotla Road, Behind Foreign Post Office, New Delhi. 6 The Central Provident Fund Commissioner, Hudco Vishala, 14, Bhikaji Kama Place, R.K. Puram, New Delhi - 110 001. 7 The Under Secretary, Appellate Authority for Industrial&Financial Reconstruction, 10th Floor, Jeevan Prakash Builidng, 25, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi - 110 001. ..... RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly, one in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the Impugned Order dt.02.07.2003 passed by the Respondent No.1 in BIFR Case No. 293 of 2000 and upon perusal of the same be pleased to quash the same as arbitrary and illegal in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.MILIND G GOKHALE Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE This Court made the following. ORDER : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _____________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J _______________________ VILAS.V.AFZUL PURKAR, J June 24, 2009. KK/DSH.