IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23202 of 2010 SANJAY @ SANJU YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 6.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Ten persons entered informant’s house, five including this petitioner are named committed loot of household articles. Two of the female inmates were dragged from the house and raped. Now there appears on deviation by filing compromise by the informant but commission of rape is corroborated by both the ladies in their statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. So finding informant able to tamper the witnesses may never favour the petitioner for anticipatory bail. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)