WP(C) 6019/2006 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) THE HON’B LE MR. JUSTICE A.C.UPADHYAY Ranjan Gogoi, CJ(Acting). By order dated 28.1.2010 eight weeks time was granted to the learned counsels f or the parties to obtain instructions with regard to the settlement of the dispu te between the parties that had led to the institution of the present writ petit ion. Sri A. M. Buzarbaruah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S. S. Dey, lea rned counsel for the respondent Bank have submitted that the parties have agreed that the amount due from the petitioner to the Bank will be paid in quarterly i nstallments over a period seven years and in fact three quarterly installments h ave already been paid. The formal agreement in this regard have, however, not ye t been drawn up. Learned counsel for the petitioner has, therefore, prayed for a djournment of the matter till such time that the formal agreement by and between the parties is executed. We do not consider it necessary to adjourn the case any further. The submissions advanced by the learned counsels for both sides indicate that parties have agre ed to the mode of repayment and in fact three installments have already been pai d by the petitioner to the respondent Bank. In such circumstances we do not see how absence of a formally executed agreement can be an obstacle for disposal of the case in terms of the agreement already arrived at and implemented. We, therefore, close this writ petition in terms of the agreement arrived at by and between the parties as noticed above with the further direction that the par ties shall execute and sign the formal agreement in this regard without any dela y. The writ petition shall stand disposed of in the above terms.