1^} HIGjHCQURTOFCHHATTISQARH :BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETiTION (Sl N0. 7046 OF 2008 Narottam Prasad Sahu, S/o Shri Brij Lat Sahu, sjged about 44 years, working as Field Assistant, Posted at Office of Joint Direetor, Directorate of Veterinary Services, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG), R/o R.E.S. Colony, House No. RE5 27, Kondagaon, Distrtet Bastar (CG). Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Department of Veterinary Services, Mantralaya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(CG). 2. The Djrector, Directorate of Veterinary Services, Chhaltisgarh, Raipur (CG). 3. Jo>ntDirector,VetermarySefVices,District Bastar (Jagdalpur). 4: Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts and Pension, District Bastar, Jagdafpyr (CG). (Writ petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia) Single Bench ; Hon'ble Shri SatishK. Agnihotri, J. Shri Rakesh Anthony, counsel for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State, Gowri ORALORDER (Passed on this 26tn day of February, 2003) Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, learned Govt. Advocate appearing Tor the State submits that it is natural that if any representation is made to the Government, fhe Govemment is under an obligation to consider and pass appropriate orders, as this is a welfare State; There is no dispute on the submission made by leamed counsel for the State. Shri Bhatia further submits that if the petttioner subinijss-a representation, the State shall consider and decide the same w^Min a , psriodofsixweeksjnaccordancewithlaw. ~. In view ofthe catefloriealstatementffladeoyleamed couns61 forthe State, learned courisel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and to file representation, if so advised. Accordingty, the petitjonstands disposed of. r\—— — Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ->.-;:1