IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-31798 of 2009 Date of Decision:11.1.2010 Sunny @ Dani .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The present petitioner is seeking regular bail in case FIR No.103 dated 4.4.2009 registered under Sections 363,366,506,120-B IPC at Police Station Sadar Hoshiarpur, District Hoshiarpur. However, the challan in the aforesaid FIR has been filed in the Court under Sections 366, 376, 506,120-B IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that co-accused namely Ajau Kumar alias Bittu and Pawan Kumar have already been granted bail and the case of the present petitioner is on better footing than them. On perusal of the FIR as well as the statement of the prosecutrix, it is apparent that the petitioner is one of the accused, who initially kidnapped the prosecutrix and forcibly held her captive. To that extent, I do not find that the role of the petitioner is similar to that of the co-accused who are granted bail. The offence being heinous in nature, CRM M-31798 of 2009 -2- no ground for grant bail is made out. Dismissed. 11.1.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE