IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Rev. No. 128 of 2004. Date of Decision: 23.9.2010. _______________________________________________ Jharu Ram ….Petitioner. Versus. Smt. Ishru Devi. .Respondent. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. Whether approved for reporting1? No. For the petitioner :Ms. Seema Sood, Advocate. For the Respondent. :Mr.Ajay Sharma, Advocate. Dev Darshan Sud, J.(Oral). The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 1.5.2004 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kangra at Dharamshala allowing the petition of the respondent-wife granting a maintenance of Rs.700/- per month. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel urges that the petitioner has been turned out of his own house by the respondent-wife and his two sons who are now encroaching upon his property. In other words, the Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment? Yes. submission is that there is no willful withdrawal from the society by the petitioner but he has been forcibly turned out of his house. In proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. I am not adjudicating on the civil rights of the parties. In case the petitioner has been turned out of his house etc., he has rights both under civil and criminal law which can establish in appropriate proceedings. This petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. (Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. September 23, 2010(R)