THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.894 of 2002 DATED: 15-07-2010 ORDER: This revision is filed by the State, questioning the judgment, dated 02-04-200, passed in Crl.R.P.No.37 of 2002 by the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Kakinada. 2. On the basis of a complaint, the Station House Officer, Corangi police station registered a case in F.I.R.No.2 of 1999 and after investigation filed charge sheet agianst the respondents herein and the same was taken on file by the learned III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kakinada as C.C.No.13 of 2000. 3. During the course of trial, the prosecution filed an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for issuance of summons to some of the witnesses stating that they are material witnesses. The learned Magistrate vide his order, dated 01-03-2002, allowed the said application. Aggrieved thereby, respondents herein filed Crl.R.P.No.37 of 2002 on the file of the leaned III Additional Sessions Judge, Kakinada, and the learned Sessions Judge reversed the said order stating that there is no need of adding the said persons as witnesses. The same is questioned in this revision. 4. Heard both sides. Perused the record. 5. Apparently, the impugned order was passed on 02-04-2002 and this court while admitting this revision did not grant any interim stay of proceedings in C.C.No.13 of 2000. In my considered view, the leaned Magistrate before whom the said C.C. is pending must have completed the trial and pronounced the judgment either way. Now, at this length of time, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the case. Further the respondents are not served with notices even after ten years. 6. Accordingly, Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. _______________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J 15th July, 2010. Tsy