WP(C) 6820/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. I.A. Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. P. Chakraborty, learned Standing Counsel, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Assam and Mr. S. Banik, learned counsel for Respondent Nos.3 & 4. The petitioner is before this Court being aggrieved by the selection of the Resp ondent No.5 as Anganwadi Worker in 113 Ikranipur Anganwadi Centre under the Boka jan ICDS Project in the district of Karbi Anglong, Assam. According to the petitioner, the Respondent No.5 is not a local inhabitant of th e area within the territorial limits of Anganwadi Centre and therefore, in terms of the Clause 2 of the advertisement dated 18.11.2009 initiating the selection process, she is not eligible to be considered for the said post. Mr. Talukdar, while reiterating the above, has submitted that meanwhile, a repre sentation has been lodged by the petitioner with the Child Development Project O fficer, ICDS, Bokajan pointing the above fact seeking his intervention, Ms. Chak raborty, however has vouched against the imputation made by the petitioner. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on a consideration of the p leaded facts, this Court, at present does not find any ground whatsoever to inte rvene. The representation dated 05.06.2010 (Annexure - 5 to the writ petition) said to have been submitted by the petitioner does not contain a whisper that the Respon dent No.5 at the relevant point of time was not a resident of the area covered b y the 113 Ikranipur Anganwadi Centre. In that view of the matter, in absence of any contemporaneous document registeri ng her grievance as now sought to be raised before this Court, no interference i s warranted. The petition lacks in merit and is dismissed. No costs.