IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 6906 of 2008. Decided on: 16.11.2010. _____________________________________________ Avtar Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he was not considered for appointment to the post of Horticulture Extension Officer on batch-wise basis. It has come in reply that the petitioner belongs to the batch of 1990-91 and the appointments have been made on batch wise basis only upto the batch of 1987-88. However, there shall be a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner to the post in question on batch wise basis as and when future vacancies are filled up. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the petition is closed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 16, 2010. (sck).