IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M- 606 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 10, 2011 Sunil Bhandari. …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana. … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Jai Vir Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.216 dated 22.11.2010, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C. registered at Police Station Sector 17/18, Gurgaon. The allegation against the accused-petitioner is that he was a Financial Manager of Bharti Infratel Limited and he in conspiracy with the other co-accused misappropriated about Rs.2.5 crore of the company by playing fraud. Crl.M.No.M-606 of 2011 In the opinion of this Court, in the present case, thorough probe/investigation is required for which custodial interrogation seems to be essential, hence, no case is made out for anticipatory bail. Dismissed. January 10, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2