BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Tenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14152 of 2011 1. MANIRAJ 2. THAVAMANI 3. MAYANDI @ AYYADURAI 4. MOORTHY 5. PERUMAL 6. MARI 7. DEVARAJ 8. KANNAN 9. GUINDY @ MUTHURAJA 10. MARANADU 11. PERUMAL 12. IRULAYEE 13. LAKSHMI 14. THANGAM @ CHINNATHANGAM ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO. 1 & 2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, D2 PERUNGUDI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.127/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.DEENADHAYALAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : MR.S.MUTHAL RAJ, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioners, who are the accused in Crime No.127 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 427, 109 and 307 of I.P.C, have come forward with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of the prosecution, due to election motive, there was a clash between the two groups involving the petitioners herein and de facto complainant party and both the sides have sustained injuries. In respect of the injuries caused by the de facto complainant party, there is also a counter case in Cr.No.126 of 2011 for similar offences. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the injured in both the cases have been discharged from the hospital. 4. The de facto complainant is represented before this Court by the learned counsel Mr.S.Muthalraj as an intervenor. He has been permitted to intervene on the oral request. He would also submit that there is a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ counter case against the de facto complainant party in Cr.No.126 of 2011. He would further submit that the injured is undergoing treatment. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the injured on both sides have been discharged from the hospital and the injuries are simple in nature. 6. Having regard to the fact that injured on both sides have been discharged from the hospital and also considering the fact that there is a counter case against the de facto complainant party, who are stated to be aggressors according to the learned counsel for the petitioners, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with stringent conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 1 and 3 to 11 shall appear before the Thiruppathur Town Police Station every day at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners 2, 12, 13 and 14, being women, shall appear before the respondent police, as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. sd/- 10/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, MADURAI. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3. THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, THIRUPPATHUR TOWN POLICE STATION, THIRUPPATHUR. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, D2 PERUNGUDI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC TO M/S. S.DEENADHAYALAN ADVOCATE SR.NO.38864 +1CC TO M/S.S.MUTHAL RAJ, ADVOCATE SR : 38972 SR : 11.11.2011 : 2P/8C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14152 of 2011 Date :10/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/