IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10434 of 2005 Bishnu Chand Singh son of late Baldev Singh, resident of Near Takiya Bazar, Samiti Mohalla-Badahiyabagh, Sasaram, District- Rohtas Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Rohtas. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sasaram, District- Rohtas. 4. The Circle Officer, Sasaram, Rohtas. 5. Balram Singh son of late Baldev Singh, near Takiya Baar Samiti, mohalla Badahiyabagh, Sasaram, District-Rohtas. ----------- 2. 09.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The writ petition has been filed for a direction to remove the encroachment from Government land in the town of Sasaram in Mauza- Muradabad Kala, Thana No. 152, Municipality old Ward No. 25 and the new Ward No. 01 Survey Khata No. 268, Municipality Khata No. 1058 Municipality Plot No. 441 of Mohalla Takiya Bazar Samiti (Badahiyabagh) Sasaram Rohtas. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the official respondents in which it is stated that notice has been issued to the encroacher for removing the encroachment failing which it has been stated that the same would be removed by the authorities. Learned counsel for the parties are readily not aware about what happened after that, since the counter itself was filed in the year 2005. In view of the aforesaid the writ petition is disposed off with liberty to 2 the petitioner to approach the concerned official respondents, if any encroachment still remains on the land in question. If such a petition is filed within two months from today alongwith a copy of this order, then the concerned respondents shall look into the matter and ensure that the public land is made encroach free. The said exercise must be completed, in accordance with law, within three months from the date of such representation being filed before the concerned authority. Anand Kr. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)