'^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT B1LASPUR M.ACNo.1095/2007 Single Bench: Hon'bfe Shri DilipRaosaheb Deshmukh, J. Appeiiant Claimant Respondents Non-applicants %?. 4. Lalit Kumar Patet S/o Siya Ram Patel, aged abput 22 years, Occupation - Teacher, R/o—VjUage - Dhaba, Police Station - Basna, Tehsil — Basna, District - Mahasamund !' • Versus ; Ghasiram Chouhan, S/o Joidha Chouhan, aged about 33 years, OcGupatjon-Driyer, R/'o Mahal Para, Saraipali.Tehsi!—Saraipali, Distrfet- Mahasamund(CC3) of vehicle lyiini Bus bearing registrat!onNo.C.G.Oe/A-8286] Jashwant Singh Saluja Sto Ihder, Singh Saluja, Occupation- Regisferecf owner of Vehicle Mini Bus C.G.06/A-8286, R/o Vitfage Basna, Tehsil-Basna, District- Mahasamund (CG) The New India insurance Company Limied, through Divisional OfFice, Divisional Managgr, Madina Building, Jail Road, Kutehery, Raipur, District-Raipyr(CG) [InsureF of vehicle Mini bus bearing registrationNo.C;G.06/A-8286] BajeefSingh Choudhari S/o R4ohan Singff Choydhari, ag.ed about 28 years, Occupation-Driver, through M.S; Transport Corporation 6f Incfia, 17/6; Mathura Road, Faridabad, Hariyana,^ A EDriver of vehicle Trailer Container bearing registration No.H.R.51/GA- 14371-: :, . • ,^ . ' ,:' M.S. Transport Corpdratjon of Inida, Tatibancih, Raipur, District-Raipur (CG), Other Address-IVi.S. Transport ^ "'«. MemQrandum of appeal 6. The Oriental Insurance Compahy Limited, through Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Madina Building, Kutchery Ghowk, Jail Road", Raipur,District-Raipur(GG) [Insurer owner of vehicle Trailer Cpntainer bearing registration NO.H.R.51/GA-1437] ynder Sectjon 173 of ffieMotor Vehicles Act. 1988. Present:- ^ Shri Shivendu Pandya.counsel forthQappellant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 28 September,2007) 1 : : : 1' • Heard on I.A. No. 1 for condonation of delay in filing this appeal. (2) For the reasons mentioned in the appliGation, deiay of 3 days in filing this appeai, is condoned. Application is allowed. (3) Heard on adrnission. » (4) The appellant is aggrieved by the award dated 30.10.2006 passed by the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Mahasamund whereby in an injury case compensation ofRs.7,000/- was awarded by the M.A.C.T. (5) Learned counsel for the appBllant did not dispute that the appellant/claimant did not suffer any grievous injury. He further submitted that the medical evidehce was not adduced by the claimant and that.the injuries sustained by the ciaimant were simple injunes. No ground for enhancement of comepensation awarded by M.A.C.T. was pointed out. (6) In that view of the matter, the appeal for enhancement. of compensation, being devbid ofany merit, is dismissed at the stage of admission. Sd/- DUipRaosaheb Deshmukh Judge Cr-t