, . n n ,ft. mg” Wm»; N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR C.G. Wnt Petltmn No g Z3 /2oo5 ETITIONER @ W Ku 26 years Sushma D/o Dw1ved1 Shrl Uttam aged Prasad about " 9" DW1ved1 R/o Q No G/N/5 Sector—C Arpa Irrigation Colony, ‘ ~ through Registrar, Bilaspur (C.G.) ' 2] College of I.T. 8L applied science through Principal, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I P / Sakri, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS /" 1] Guru Ghasidas University, The instant patition has b en filedby the petitioner being aggrieved by the result of revaluation of her answer sheets of Post Graduate ‘ Diploma in Computer Appiications conducted by respondent No. 1. K The grievance o; the peti oner is that in the main examination she secured 38 marks in Computer undamentais and 40 marke in Data Base Management System and Distri uted Processing. The petitioner appiied for revaluation of the aboi/e two ubiects and as per the revaluation result, she got 22 more marks in Data ase Management System anti Distributed Processing but the marks obta ed by her in Computer Fundamentals remained unchanged and as such she was’ declared as unsuccessful. By order dated 10.03200 this Court directed respondent No.1 to .produce the answer sheets of th above subject along with the Lecturer of the said subject sothat revaluati n of the answer sheet could be correctly done. The petitioner was also di ected to deposit a sum of Rs.1,000/- in case her petition fails. The matter was again’tak n up ion 22.03.2005 and as per the order dated 22.03.2005, the matter ist ken up today. ‘ (desfea) XI—HC—22 WEN Wm WW mmm v WW§wW %a¢%um 12.04.2005:- ‘Shri \fwek Sharma, couns lfor the petitioner. Shn’ Manindra Shrivasta , Sr. Advocate with Shri Amit Verma: ‘ counsel‘forthe respondents.