IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5065 OF 2004 Hussain Nabesab Shaikh and another ... Applicant versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr. B.A. Ahoor, for the Applicant. Mr. R.Y. Mirza, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 30th November 2004 P.C.: . On the previous occasion, matter was adjourned on the statement made by the Counsel for the Applicant that the Applicant is willing to pay the entire amount along with appropriate interest. Today, the Counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant is not in a position to raise the amount, which is payable to the complainant and further that the complainant is not willing to compromise. In the circumstances, matter was heard on merits. Perused the record. Having regard to the materials on record regarding involvement of the Applicant and prima facie offence is made out, not a case for anticipatory bail. Rejected.