THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.C. No. 396 of 2011 Oral order: The petitioner, alleging that the respondent has violated the orders dated 10.08.2010 passed by this in W.P. No. 1063 of 2010, filed this contempt case, praying the Court to punish the respondent for contempt. The respondent having received notice in the contempt case filed counter stating that pursuant to the order dated 10.08.2010 passed by this Court in the writ petition, he issued notices under Section 406, 452 and 461 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 to Seventh Day Adventist Church, on 07.01.2011. But even before he issued the notice, the said Church applied for regularization of the deviated portion of the construction under BPS-2008 by paying requisite fee in terms of G.O. Ms. No. 112, dated 31.12.2008 and Memo No. 26270/M1, dated 17.06.2009, and as the deviations were regularizable, the Municipal Corporation, passed orders in proceedings BPS No. 859/2008/G2, dated 31.12.2010, regularizing the unauthorized constructions. The orders of regularization were also intimated to the petitioner by issuing notice dated 27.02.2011, which was pasted on the wall of the petitioner’s house as he refused to receive. As the constructions made by the Church were regularized, no fault can be found with the action of the respondent in taking action against the unauthorized constructions made by the Church. Hence, the contempt case is closed. However, if the petitioner so chooses, is at liberty to challenge the orders dated 31.12.2010 passed by the Municipal Corporation, regularizing the unauthorized constructions made by the Church. No cots. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 2nd September, 2011 KSR