-o SMGLEBEHCH ^.\6o(^ M COURT OF CHHATHSG^ WMT PETTTION No. J <=>^O Petitioner Respondents Versus 1. Shesh Mani Mishra Ag^ aboat 33 years,S/o Sri P.N.Mishra ,PRT English, TATA DAVPubUc School, Sonadih P.0. Raseda Dist- Raipur Pemianent R/0 LIG- 142 ,Ravi Shaakar Nagar, Near Ghanta Ghar ,Distt. Korba, C.G. DAV College Tmst And Management Society, Through it's President Chitra Gupta Road NewDelhi-55 ,,.J-2$£^: ^•^^•^-^ ^^>-:-r^ rc '^&"^ <' 3. 4. Regional Director/Manager, DAVPublic Schools, Hudco, Bhilai Distt.Durg (C.G.) TATADAVPublic School Through the Vice-President / Chairman ,LMC Sonadih, Dist: Raipur (CG) S.N.Bakshi,Principal TATA,DAV Public Sehool Sonadih, Dist: Raipur (CG) / Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constittttioil oflndia. IN HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITJON N0.1640 OF 2005 PETmQNER Shesh Mani Mishra RESPONDENT Versus DAV College Trust and Management Sodety & Others ^ \0 (Writ Petition under Articie 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Gary Mukhopadhyay, Advocate for the petjtioner. Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate for the respondent No.4. ORDER (ORALy (P«ss®don this 13th day ofApriS, 2011) 1) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner pfeads no instructions. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2) Accordingly, the writ petition is^jsmissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- SarishK.Agrib»trl Judge Arun