HIGH^SOUOT eFGHHAmaeMlHAT BILASPUR Writ ReBUon (St No. 87S4 afSOW Petttioner LD.Mahant,agedalx)ut57yeans,son of Shri Nanki Das Mahant, B*u- Uddeshiya Svrasth^ Kai^teute-Sub Health Centre-Fareegaiti, Under Primary Health Centre-Bhairamgarti, Distt. Dantewada (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgaih Throu^i tt's Secretaiy, Departmert of Medical and FamilyWelfare, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Collec^or, Dlstt Dantewada (C.G.) 3. The Chief Medlcal and HeaBh Offwr, District Hospital-Dantawada, Dist. Dantewada (C.G.) 4. Btook Mectical Officer, Primaiy Health Centre-BhaiFamgarh, Btock Bhairamgarti, Distt Dartewada. 5. Block Medical Offieer, Bkiek Konte, Primary Health Centre-Konta, Dlstt. Dantewada (C.G.) WWT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THB CONSnTUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice SaUsh K. Agnlhotri) Shri Manoj Jaiswal, Advocateforthe petftidier. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Actvoate for the respondertsState. Bl- ORDER (Passed on this 12ndayofJuly, 200(7) Leamed counset appearing fer ttw petttiCTier submtts Uirt the petitioner was suspended vlde ordsr dated 8.2.2001 and during hls suspension pericri, he has nrt been paid subsistenee allowance. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondent^State submits that If the subsistence allowanee has not been pafd tor the period he was under suspension, the same shall be paid In accordance with law at the earliest. In view of categorical statement made by teaimed eounsel appaartng for the responctents^tate, learned counsel appearing 1w the petitiona' submits that nothing sufvh^s in Uils mrtter. The writ petition ts accordtngly disposed of. 1 Sd/- 1 Satish K. Agnihom Judge