1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 3520/2007 (Sushila Bhojraj Hajare & another VERSUS State of Mah. And others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Mr. Dangore, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ahirkar, Addl Central Govt. Standing Counsel for the R-2 to 4. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 7, 2007. Heard Mr. Dangore, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ahirkar, the learned Additional Central Government Standing Counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 4. The counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to make a representation to the respondent no.2 for redressal of his grievance made in the petition within four weeks and prayed that appropriate directions in this regard may be given. The learned Additional Central Government Standing Counsel states that if such representation is made, same would be considered on its own merits at the earliest. In view of the statement made by the Additional Central Government Standing Counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2, nothing survives in the 2 instant writ petition. In the circumstances, writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE JUDGE APTE