IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14485 of 2009 1. NAWAL KISHORE SINGH 2. Ramchandra Sharma Versus 1. The STATE OF BIHAR 2. Sunil Ram ------ 6/ 29.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Complainant is said non-existent. On notice though a lawyer appeared for the complainant but he was requested to produce the complainant and at the same time, order was made that if in case he fails to produce the complainant, it would be presumed that the complainant was a fake person, but complainant does not appear. Court is bound to presume that the complainant is not in existence. In such view of the matter, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 2 of 2008 (Tr. No. 667 of 2008), above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Samastipur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)