1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WIRT PETITION NO. 3893 OF 2010 Laxman Vishwanath Vane and another ... PETITIONERS V E R S U S Thakaji S/o Ramchandra Vane and others ... RESPONDENTS ... Mr.K.S.Bhore,Advocate for Petitioners. Mr.R.R.Karpe,Advocate for respondent Nos 1 to 4. ... CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 28TH APRIL, 2010 PER COURT 1] Heard Counsel. 2] The Court Commissioner was to be appointed as per consent, which was to be given by the parties. It appears that with common consent, the Advocate has been so appointed. The direction of the trial Court is, to visit the land in question to locate existence of common bandh, if any, and the existence of the water canal etc. The Court Commissioner shall not however, record any evidence or statements of witnesses including adjoining owners and shall carryout the work of inspection on factual basis. 3] The Writ Petition is therefore disposed of. Sd/- ( V.R.KINGAONKAR ) JUDGE MTK/ 2