IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41405 of 2008 RAJU @ RAJEEV RAUSHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 20/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under Sections- 323, 341 and 386/34 of I.P.C. The submission is that Section-386 of I.P.C. is ornamental. Both of them are neighbours and there is a dispute between them with regard to passage for which purpose learned counsel invites the attention of the Court to the address of the informant in the F.I.R. and the address of the petitioner. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Gaya Kotwali P.S. Case No.68/04, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )