IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7213 of 2009 VEENA MISHRA, wife of Dr. Basuki Nath Mishra, Resident of Village- Mog Bajitpur, P.O. and P.S.- Bajitpur, District- Samastipur :---- Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Secretary, District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Patna. 5. The District Magistrate, Patna. 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Patna. 7. The Block Development Officer, Athmalgola, District- Patna. :---- Respondents. ----------- 02. 01.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the suspension order bearing Memo No. 127 dated 28.02.2009, Annexure-1. It is submitted on his behalf that even after passage of four months the memo of charge has not been served on him. 3. Let the disciplinary authority ensure service of memo of charge on the petitioner as early as possible, in any case within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and thereafter the petitioner should file his written defence and the Enquiry Officer should proceed with the enquiry and submit the Enquiry-Report as early as possible, in any case within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the written defence by the Enquiry Officer and the disciplinary authority must pass final order in the proceeding as early as possible, in any case within another two months of the receipt of the Enquiry-Report and with these directions this writ application is disposed of. It is, however, made clear that in the event the time frame as given in this order is not adhered to by the authorities, it shall be open for the petitioner to apply for revocation of his suspension before the disciplinary authority itself. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha, J.)