IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 14 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 581 OF 2008 SMT. ASHA BICO NAIK AND ANR., ... Applicants Versus SHRI RAJENDRA BABONIM NAIK OR RAJENDRA NAIK AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents Shri J. E. Coelho Pereira, Senior Advocate with Shri V. Korgaonkar, Advocate for the Applicants. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 30th June, 2009 P.C.:- Heard Shri J. E. Coelho Pereira, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of the Applicants who were the Defendants in R.C.S. No. 3/2005. An application appears to be filed before the District Judge i.e. Exh.D-25 for the purpose of deletion of an issue which was already decided. This Court observed that the application was misconceived as the issue was already decided, whereupon the Applicants withdrew the said application Exh.D-25. Issues raised in the said application, obviously, the Applicants/Defendants would be able to raise in the said appeal at the time of its hearing on merits. With the above observations, the review application is disposed of. In other words, the Applicants/Defendants would be at liberty to urge before the appellate Court that the adverse possession did not arise. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.