IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 103 OF 2003 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 103 OF 2003 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 103 OF 2003 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 5040 OF 2000 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 5040 OF 2000 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 5040 OF 2000 Shakun K. Luthria ..Plaintiff versus M/s. Rajpal Brothers & Ors. ..Defendants Mr. P. S. Anand for the Plaintiff. Ms. Parvati Kaushik i/b. B. S. Chandnani for the Defendants. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. DATE : 11TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 11TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 11TH OCTOBER 2004. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . Heard counsel for the parties. Counsel for the defendants state that they have no instructions in the matter and that they have filed vakalatnama. . It appears from the roznama dated 11.8.2004 that Mr. R. Shukla for the defendants had appeared and he made a statement that settlement talks are going on between the parties. . Counsel for the Plaintiff tenders List of original documents. The same are taken on record. The suit of the plaintiff is based on a bill of exchange. The claim in the suit is Rs.52,884.93 paise, principal amount is Rs.50,000/=. Since there is no reply to the summons for judgment, the suit stands decreed as prayed for with 12% future interest on the principal amount from the date of the suit till realisation and costs. Refund of court fees, as per the Rules. Decree be drawn up accordingly. Suit and Summons for Judgment both stands disposed of accordingly. Certified copy expedited. *****