IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2816 of 2008 BHARTI MITRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 21.01.2009 Heard Mr. K.K. Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Tiwari seems to be correct that there is a typographical error in the last but one paragraph at page-3 of the order dated 18.03.2008 wherein in the third line from the bottom the expression “restraining” ought to have been “restoring.” That being so, the last but one paragraph of the order dated 18.03.2008 would read as follows:- “It goes without saying that any decision in this regard must be taken after notice and/or opportunity of hearing to both the petitioner and respondent no.4 and in the event Director, Secondary Education holds that the petitioner is senior most teacher of the school he would also pass an order for restoring the petitioner his adhoc status of the Acting Headmaster till a regular incumbent is posted as the Headmaster of the school.” Accordingly, the order dated 18.03.2008 shall stand modified to the aforementioned extent. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)