EN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTI GARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No 6 Z781 2005 Sanjay Singh S/o Late S.P.Singh, Aged about 40years, R/o M.I.G—1—823, Amdri Nagar, Hudco Sector Bhjlai, Dist . Durg-[C.G.) Pr etitione State of Chhattisgarh Through — The Secretmy Ministry of Town and Administration Development Department, D.K.S. Bhavvan, Raipur—(C.G.} The Collector, Durg, Dist : Durg—(C.G.) The Commissioner, Bhilai Municipal Corporationk Bhilai, Dist : Durg—(C.G.) The Chairman SAIL lspat Bhawan, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. SAIL through M.D. Bhilai Steel Plant, lspat Bhawan Bhilai, Dist: Durg—(C.G.) State Election Commission Through — The Secretary Mahanadi Block Ministerial premises, Raipur, Dist Raipur~(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SINGLE BENCH ‘ HDN’BLE MR SATKSHK AGNIHGTRI J WRITW PET§T£ON NO.6278 OF 2€m5 Pe’titioner Sanjay Singh VEYSUS Resgondents state of Chhattisgarh and othe¥s Present : Mr.Arun Shuk!a,counselfoythe petitioner. Mr. Sushi! Dubey, Government Advccate for respondents No.1 and 2. None appears for other respondenis. ORDER (Passed an 11’” Day or December, 2005} The petitioner, a resident of Bhiiai township area, has fried ihis petition seeking a direction to the respondents -— authorities to deciare the township area as an industrial town for the deveiopment of better faciiity and basic infrestructure in the township area. The petitioner has further'sought a direction to set aside the order of the State Eiectien Commission with regard to holding of the election on 16» i 2-2005 2. So far as the prayer made at para 7.3 in the writ petition is concerned, this petition has become infructuous as the eiection had already taken place on 16-1 $2095. ,‘x 2 With regard to the prayef made at para 2?.2 i 3. n :he peiitien, the petm'oner has enciosed a lettef dated 19-5—2004 (Annexure PA), wherein the Commissioner, Municipai Corporation, Bhi§ai has informed i0 the Joint Director, Town Pianning and Development, Chhai‘iisgarh, Raipur that the area in dispute does not come within the area of Bhiiai R Municipal Corporation and necessary correspondehce can be made with the Bhiiai Steei Plant. 4. in view of the letter dated 19-5-2004 (Annexure P-1), it is not necessary to entertaih this petition, which is devoid of facts and grounds, on the basis of which relief is sought for. 5. The petiti is accordtngly dismissed. Howaven the petitioner is at liberty to approach the Bhilai Steel Plant, if so advised, to consider and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. No order as to costs, ” Sd/. Satish K. Agnihotn' Judge Gopal on N j l