IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52427 of 2007 RAHUL SINGH, SON OF LALAN PRATAP SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-BHAWANIPUR JIRAT, P.S. CHHATAUNI, MOTIHARI, DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN………………………...PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : M/s. Uma Shankar Shukla and Shakti Suman Kumar, Advocates. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, A.P.P. For O.P. No.2 : M/s. Anil Kumar and Jai Prakash Singh, Advocates. ------------- 3. 5.2.2009. In this application, the petitioner, one of the two F.I.R. named accused of Chhatauni P.S. Case No.92 of 2002, has prayed for the quashing of the order dated 18.9.2007 passed therein by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, East Champaran at Motihari, whereby the learned court below has committed the case to the court of Sessions and proceeded on the basis of the supplementary chargesheet submitted under Sections 341 and 504 I.P.C. The submission advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner had earlier filed a case being Motihari(Town) P.S. Case No.301 of 2002 under Sections 341, 323, 379, 406/34 I.P.C. which had ended in compromise between the parties and the instant case being a counter blast to the other was likely to end in compromise since the witnesses examined in the other trial expressed their desire not to proceed with the case any further. Since the instant case has already been committed to the court of Sessions, the instant application has become infructuous. - 2 - Due regard being had to the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner move the trial court and see ways and means for disposing of the matter. With the aforesaid observations, this application is disposed of. P.S. (Abhijit Sinha,J)