IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1557 of 2011 along with CWP Nos. 1558 to 1565 and 1581 of 2011 Date of decision: 24.3.2011. 1. CWP No. 1557 of 2011 Ishwar Dutt vs. State of H.P. and ors. 2. CWP No. 1558 of 2011 Jai Ram vs. State of H.P. and ors. 3. CWP No. 1559 of 2011 Gopal Singh vs. State of H.P. and ors. 4. CWP No. 1560 of 2011 Yog Raj vs. State of H.P. and ors. 5. CWP No. 1561 of 2011 Nand Lal vs. State of H.P. and ors. 6. CWP No. 1562 of 2011 Dhani Ram vs. State of H.P. and ors. 7. CWP No. 1563 of 2011 Dalip Kumar vs. State of H.P. and ors. 8. CWP No. 1564 of 2011 Sahi Ram vs. State of H.P. and ors. 9. CWP No. 1565 of 2011 Hari Dass vs. State of H.P. and ors. 10. CWP No. 1581 of 2011 Salig Ram vs. State of H.P. and ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the Petitioners : Ms. Aruna Sharma vice Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K.Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. …2… Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) These writ petitions are filed with the identical prayers, one set of such prayers is as follows:- “(i).Directing the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner w.e.f. 1.1.1991 as per policy of the Govt. after his having rendered eight years and also grant work charge status after completion of 10 years w.e.f. 1.1.1993 on the analogy of the Gauri Dutt’s case and further directions be issued to grant all consequential benefits of regularization and grant of work charge status to the petitioner, while granting him the benefit of the regularization from the due date.” 2. It is submitted that the matter has been answered by the State Administrative Tribunal and the order of Tribunal was challenged before this court and this court has dismissed the same, as can be seen from Annexure P-2, judgment in CWP No. 420 of 2006. It is further submitted that said judgment has been accepted and implemented by the State. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are similarly situated persons, like the petitioner in the said case. The petitioners have submitted their individual representation, Annexure P-6 to first respondent. There will be a direction to the first respondent to look into all the aspects of the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law and justice without discriminating the petitioners within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner concerned. …3… 3. With the above observations, these writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. March 24, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (BSS/pankaj) Judge.