Civil Revision No. 1163 of 2008 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1163 of 2008 Date of Decision: 12.8.2009 Amar Singh ......Petitioner Versus Vidya Kaur and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Ms. Rachna Arora, Advocate, for Shri Amar Vivek, advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Joshi, Advocate, for the respondents. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral). The plaintiff is in revision aggrieved against the orders passed by the learned Courts below, whereby his application for ad-interim injunction was dismissed. The plaintiff has claimed that the defendants be restrained from alienating, transferring or otherwise encumbering the house in dispute as shown in the site plan. Both the Courts have found that the defendants were put in possession of the property in dispute on the basis of compromise dated 15.3.2005. The defendants are none else but wife and daughter of the plaintiff. Civil Revision No. 1163 of 2008 (2) Since the defendants are claiming possession in terms of the compromise, I do not find any patent illegality or material irregularity in the finding recorded, which may warrant interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 12.8.2009 ds