IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 6TH OCTOBER 2009 / 14TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 27942 of 2009(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MARIAMMA SIMON, LEGAL HEIR OF SIMON ABRAHAM, KAIPPALLIDATHIL, AYROOR, RANNY. BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX AND COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, RANNY. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. ------------------------------ W.P.(C).No.27942 OF 2009 ------------------------------ Dated this the 6th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T ---------------------- 1. Grievance of the petitioner is that 1st respondent is not giving effect to the appellate orders issued with respect to assessment of agricultural income tax against the petitioner for the various years from 1978-79 to 1999-2000. According to the petitioner if the directions contained in Ext.P1 to P7 appellate orders are given effect, the petitioner will be entitled for refund of considerable amount of tax, already paid. The petitioner had submitted Ext.P8 request in this regard before the 1st respondent. Ext.P8 is dated 11.8.2009. Complaint of the petitioner is that inspite of lapse of many years since passing of the appellate order, the 1st respondent is not taking any effective steps for revising the assessments, inspite of specific requests made in this regard. 2. Having considered facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the writ petition can be disposed directing the 1st respondent to pass revised orders at the earliest. 3. In the result the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P8 and to pass revised W.P.(C).27942/09-K 2 assessments with respect to the assessment years concerned with Ext.P1 to P7 orders, if they have attained finality, as early as possible, at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. okb