1 S.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.11/2006 Dinesh Kumar and another. vs. Jagdish Prasad and others. DATE OF ORDER ::: 10.1.2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.RS Saluja, for the petitioners. Mr.KL Thakur, AAG ) for the respondents. Mr.MA Naushad for Mr.M Shishodia ) - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the parties. It appears that the petitioner has already preferred another contempt petition no.10/2006 which was dismissed by this Court by order dated 21.12.2006. The present contempt petition was also preferred as back as on 18.1.2006. The contention of the petitioner is that the amount of family pension was paid to the non-petitioner no.1 and the non-petitioner no.1 withdrew that amount despite the order of this Court and, therefore, the non-petitioner no.1, father of the petitioners, and the officers of the Government Department have violated the orders of this Court. 2 Since that fact was very much in the knowledge of the petitioners when they preferred the earlier contempt petition no.10/2006 and when the contempt petition was argued on their behalf, I do not find any reason to entertain this contempt petition and appropriate relief can be granted to the petitioners in the main appeal itself and it is not a fit case for proceeding with the contempt proceedings. Consequently, this contempt petition is hereby dismissed. Notices are discharged. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya