IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13461 of 2009 1. AJIT SAH 2. Pramod Sah 3. Shiv Jee Sah 4. Ratan Lal Sah Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 24.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that certainly, there was business transaction in between the parties. Tobacco was being purchased from the complainant but the total price was paid either by Cheque or through cash, but for otherwise grudge this case is lodged. Allegation levelled does not constitute any offence under Section 406 of I.P.C. Dues, if any, was there that was for the price of the tobacco which was sold in the year 2004, even if petitioners are apprehending their arrest, which can never be justified their arrest. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel of the petitioners. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 175 of 2008, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Samastipur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)