)\ HIGH COURT 6F JUBICATURE CHHATTRSGARH : BILASPUR $ENGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHR! SR. NAYAK, CJ. Writ Petition No.3940 of 2006 Preseni : Shri N.K. Chatterjee, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Utkarsh Verma, learned Govt. Advocate for the State of C.G. and its authorities. ORAL ORDER i (Peesed on lg August, 2006) To put the case of the petitioner, in brief, is that he and four others, namely, Kishlal, Jhadiram, Ram Kishun and Nanu Ram Sahu jointly purchased a tractor bearing registration No.C.G.O4ZG-9413 and trolley\ bearing registration No.0G-04ZG/9414, having secured loan from the Co—operative Bank, Navapara Branch, Raipur. lt is stated that after the purchase, the tractor and trolley were in the custody of the petitioner. It is compiained that on 275/2006 the four others referred to above forcibly and without the consent of the petitioner took away the vehicles. The petitioner claims that he submitted a representation dated 13.6.2006 marked as Annexure—P/3 in that regard to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Raipur, the second respondent herein, but he has not taken any action against them. With these allegations the writ petition is tiled for a direction to the PETITIONER Brij Lai Sahu S/o Late Uday Ram Sahu, Aged about 58 years R/o Vinage Parsada, Poiice Station - Gobra, Tehsil — Abhanpur, Dist: Raipur —- (C.G .) 7 Vs. RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through -— Home Secretary, D.K.S‘. Bhawan, Raipur, Dist: Raipur—(C.G.) 2. The Sr.Supdt. of Police, Raipur, Dist: Raipur - (C.G.) g second respondent to take action against the aforementioned persons who are guilty of wrong doing. ‘g— (2) Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, i am of the considered opinion that this writ petition does not deserve to be admitted under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia. lt does not involve enforcing any public law obligation. On the petitioner own showing, the dispute brought before this Court relates to the title to own and possess the subject vehicles. if the subject tractor and trolley are iointly purchased by the petitioner and four others, and all the five are joint owners of the properties and only four of them using the said properties denying the right to the petitioner, such dispute has to be resolved in a jurisdictional civil Court by filing appropriate suit. Reserving that liberty to the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Sdl- Chief Justice