1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 254 OF 2010 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 160 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6081 OF 2009 Ajay Machindra Ghropade ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. B.V. Thombre, advocate for the applicant Mrs. V.A. Shinde, A.G.P. for respondents ..... CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 26TH OCTOBER, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 This civil application is filed in disposed of contempt petition with following prayers; A) Civil Application may kindly be allowed. B) The respondents may be penalized for non compliance of direction issued by this Hon’ble court by order dated 2 4.2.2009. C) The respondents may be penalized for preparation, manipulation and fabrication of reply dated 26.3.2009. D) The disciplinary action may be taken against respondents for mis-leading to this Hon’ble court and petitioner E) The respondent No.2 to 5 may kindly be directed to consider representations dated 12.5.2008 and 7.6.2008 claiming regularization in service in accordance with G.R. dated 22.1.1986 and 12.6.1990 afresh as still there are so many vacant posts. F) Any other suitable and equitable relief may be granted in favour of the applicant. 2 Upon hearing counsel for the applicant and after going through the contents of the civil application and annexures thereto, in my opinion, in the light of para 2 of the order dated 11.11.2009 in contempt petition No. 160 of 2009, I do not find any substance in the contention of the counsel for the applicant. This Court in its order dated 11.11.2009 in para 2 observed that, “after going through affidavit filed by the respondents and decision which is placed on record dated 3 26.3.2009, I am satisfied that the order of this court dated 4.2.2009 passed in writ petition No. 6081 of 2008 has been complied with and there is no case for taking cognizance of the contempt.” 3 In the result, in my opinion, this court has applied its mind to the facts of the case, and thereafter passed the appropriate order and declined to take cognizance of the contempt petition and dropped the contempt proceeding. It is not possible to reopen the contempt proceeding again, since no case is made out. Civil application is therefore, disposed of. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) rlj/