IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.478 of 2010 1. VIVEK KUMAR @ VIEKY @ VIVEK KUMAR GUPTA SON OF SURESH PRASAD 2. SURESH PRASAD SON OF LATE HARILAL PRASAD BOTH R/O VILLAGE- PURANI CHOWK, RAM NATH MARG, VDIHA NAGAR, WARD NO. II, P.S. & DISTRICT- GOPALGANJ Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 04/02/2010 Heard Mr. Ghulam Rabbani learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the complainant and learned APP for the State. The petitioners apprehend his arrest in a complaint case registered under Sections 363, 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that the complainant was running a shop of electrical goods. He was married with Sita Devi in the year 1995. One daughter and one son were born out of that wedlock. The accused persons being neighbours enticed her and they took her away with some of the articles. Submission is that the complainant was initially inquired into and by a detailed order the complaint was dismissed by the SDJM and on revision the complaint case was revived. It is further submitted that being the neighbours the petitioners have no concern with the activities of the complainant and his family. A matrimonial suit was filed by the complainant on the same day. 2 Prayer for bail has been opposed by the learned APP assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant. It is submitted that the wife of the complainant is still traceless. Considering the above facts, the petitioners above named are directed to surrender before the court below within 20 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and on their so surrendering they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M./concerned Court Gopalganj in connection with Complaint Case No. 83 of 2007. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)