IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER, TWO THOUSAND TEN WRIT PETITION No.25530 of 2010 Between: B.Rama Krishna Paramahamsa. … Petitioner And The District Collector, Kurnool and others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: None Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies. This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the Proceedings No.RC(B)/1470/2009 dated 30-8-2010 issued by the respondent No.2 with consequential relief if any and set aside the same as contrary to law, illegal, arbitrary, malice, violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner on permanent basis in as fair price shop dealer at F.P.No.9 of Vanamaulapadu West, Pagidyala Mandal of Kurnool District, in the interest of justice.” On 8-10-2010 and 26-10-2010 the Writ Petition was adjourned at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Today, at the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing his cause in the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed in default. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP Nos.32614 and 33816 of 2010 are dismissed as infructuous. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:29-10-2010 MNR