IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 44 OF 2007 FROM ORDER NO. 44 OF 2007 FROM ORDER NO. 44 OF 2007 Akruti Anil Mistry. ... Appellant. V/s. Deepshikha Jeet Upendera & ors. ... Respondents. A.M.Saraogi for the appellant. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 18th January 2007. 18th January 2007. 18th January 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . For the nature of arrangement directed by the trial Court during the pendency of the suit on the finding that there is no material on record to show that defendant No.1 has transferred the suit premises in the name of defendant No.3, with which I am in agreement, the proper course, to my mind, is to direct the trial Court to dispose of the suit expeditiously. Accordingly, trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously as High Court expedited case. All questions in the suit are left open to be decided on its own merits uninfluenced by the observations made in the impugned judgment or for that matter disposal of this appeal. Accordingly, appeal is disposed of on the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, A.M.KHANWILKAR, A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. J. J.)