HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAniSGARH: BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ Petjtjoner Writ Petition hto. 2728 of 2005 Durgesh Kumar Soni, aged about 17 yeare. S/o Uttam Kumar Soni, occupation student of Maheshri School Road, Mangla, Bilaspur, Tahsil and Distrjct Bilaspur (C.G.) Resfiondente VERSUS 1. Vice Chaltencelor, Guru Ghasi Das Uroversity.Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. The Controlter Examination, Govt (Auto) Science P.G. College. Bilaspur 3. The Principal. Government (Auto) Sdence P.G. College, Bilaspur (C.G.) Present: Smt Renu Kochar, learned counset for the petitioner. Shri Ashish Shriwastava, toarned counsel for respwident No.1. ORALORDIER (Passedon 27th June, 2006) No effective relief could be granted to the petitioner for ward of materiat particulare. The petitioner has sought for a direction to fte responctents to carry wA revaliation of all ttie answer-^wets crf B,Sc^2 Year examination of the pefitioner. The petjfioner has arrayed the Vice Chancetlor, Guru Ghasi Das Universify. Bilaspur; the Controlter Examination, Govl(Auto) Science P.G. Coltege, Bilaspur and The Principal. Govt(Auto) Science P.G. Cotlege. BMaspur as respondents 1 to 3, respectively. In para 5.6, it is stated that the petitioner macte oral as well as written requests to therespondents-authority. On behalf of the -2-- 1st respondent, retum is fited steting that the documents placed before the Court woutd not show the petitioner making any application to the respondents-authorities for revaluation of the answer-sheete. It fe not ctear from the records placed before the Court as to when the petitioner made the applfeation to the 2nd or 3rd respondent for ravahiatfon of the answer-sheets. Even copies of the applicattons are not annexed to the writ petition. In fhat view of the matter, I dismjss the writ petitton for want of material particulars. No coste. Sd/- Chief Justice ^