2. 3. 4. HIGHCPURTOPCHHATTlBGAim^^^: Writ Petition IS} No. 1430 of2009 Petitioner Madhusudaa Siagh Uo^, S/o Shri C,L.Nag, ^ed about 27 years, R/o PO : Bhaiiupratappur, ViUage - Bhjaaupratappur, Distt Kankr(C.G.) Versus Respondents<t 1, State of Chhattisgarh, thiough the Dircctor (Research), Caste Certfficate Hig^. Level Scrutiay Committee, Scheduled Caste Research & Trainiag Institate, Pt, Ravishaiikar Shulda Uiuversily Caoipus, Raipur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, TbK)ugh the Secretary, Department of Hoiae Aflfairs, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Inspector General of Police (Admmistratioii), Police head Quarters, Civil Liaes, Raipur Dr. T.K-Vaishnav, S/o Not kaown to fhe petitioner Memtoer & Director (Research) Caste Certificate High Level Scruttay Coinixiittee, Scheduled Caste Research & Training Institute, Pt. Ravishaakar Stiukla University Campus, Raipur (C.G.) (Writ Petition Under Article 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble ShriSatishK. AgmhotriJ.) Shri P, S. Koshy, Advocate for the pelitloner. Shri Yashwaat Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocats General wifh Ms Sunita Jaia, Panel Lawyer for fhe respondents No, 1 to 3. ORDBR (Passed on this 20th day ofApril, 2009) 1, Leanied counsel appearing for fhe petittoner submite that the petitioner does not waiit to contest this petition on merits, at fhis stage aad prays for wiftidrawal of this petition wiffci liberty to make an appUcation, However, it is further subixiitted tfiat fhe conceraed aufhority may be directed to consider aad decide fhe saixie ia accordance wifh law wifhin stipulated period. He ,/-^"\ fe. 1 '^iF^ j -^y' ^ ^^ ^ fiirther submits fhat tiU decision on fhe appUcation is takea, sonie protection raay be graated. Shri Yashwaat Siagh Thakur, leanied Depuly Advoc^te Geneial appearing for ffaie respondents/Stat submits fhat if aa application is made by fhe petitioner withia a period of <me week, fhe same shatl be considered and decidad, iei accordanas wifh law, wifhia a period of four weeks fromi the date of rcceipt offhe application. In view of fhe foregoing, fhe petition is dismissed as withdrawn witfa fhe above-stated liberty. It is expected fbat fhe concemed auffaonties woidd consider aaadl decide tlie application, ifany, as above, wifhin a period of four weeks JBrc>mi tfae date of receipt of fhe representation along wifh a copy offhis order. In fhe facts sitoation of fhe case, ffaere shaU be no coerciye action, pursuant to fhe ixapugned order, ttll ffae deedtsion of Ae High Powered Committee on fhe appUcation offhe petitioner. ThaJair Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge