: 1 : wp-4259-11=.doc USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4259 OF 2011 Bhimjyot Mahila Sudharna Mandal .. Petitioner v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents ......... Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar for the petitioner Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP for respondent nos. 1 and 2 Mr. Vineet Naik with I.M. Khirdi for respondent no.3 Mr. Haribhau Deshinge i/b Nitin Jamdar for respondent nos. 5 and 6. ......... CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATE : 9th AUGUST, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, taken up for hearing. 3. Counsel appearing for the private parties jointly submit that the petition be disposed of without recording any reasons, on the following terms. (a) The impugned decision dated 12th August, 2008 passed by the respondent no.2 is quashed and set aside. : 2 : wp-4259-11=.doc (b) The respondent no.2 shall reconsider the proposal submitted by respondent no.3 and 4 for shifting of the respondent no.4 School after giving fair opportunity to all concerned, including the petitioner. That question will have to be decided afresh on its own merits and in accordance with law. (c) The respondent no.2 shall consider the said proposal as expeditiously as possible and in any case not later than EIGHT weeks from today. 4. Both the parties assure to extend full co-operation to the respondent no.2 for early disposal of the said proposal. The parties shall appear in the office of the respondent no.2 on 29th August, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. The petitioner as well as respondent nos. 3 and 4 waive notice for the said hearing. Respondent no.2 shall take steps to give notice to other parties, who are concerned with the outcome of the said proposal, well in advance. 5. Petition disposed of on the above terms with no order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)