IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9572 of 2009 DR.NIRMAL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, aged about 65 years, son of Late Adya Sharan Lal, resident of Vivekanand Park, Patliputra, P.S. Patliputra, District Patna, retired as Reader in Commerce, B.D. Evening College, Mithapur, Patna, constituent Unit of Magadh University. ---Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secreatry, Higher Education having his office at Vikas Bhavan, Police Station- Sachivalaya, District-Patna. 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District Gaya. 3. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District Gaya. 4. The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District Gaya. 5. The Principal, B.D. Evening College, Mithapur, Police Station Gardanibagh, District Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 11.8.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-University as also the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of the retiral dues as stated in the writ application. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the grievances of the petitioner should be considered by the University in the light of the order of this Court passed on 15.9.2006 in M.J.C. No.153 of 2006 and analogous cases. It is further submitted that the petitioner has represented before the respondent-University, as contained in Annexures 2 and 4, for redressal of his grievances. However, the same has not been redressed as yet. The learned counsel for the respondent-University submits that in case the petitioner files a fresh representation stating the details of his claims, the same would be considered without delay. 2 In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of the pending claims, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Registrar, Magadh University (respondent no.3). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the claims separately enclosing the copy of the relevant documents along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the respondent no.3 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the pending claims of the petitioner, who retired on 31st of July, 2004, could be settled without delay and the admissible dues with statutory interest could be paid. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)