IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1661 OF 2011 Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C against the Order dated 13.05.2011 passed in M.P.No. 54 of 2011 in M.C.No. 333 of 2010, on the file of the Hon'ble Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the trail of JHCBB Case4um- Additional Family Court-Cum-XXlll Additional Chief Judge, Hyderabad. Between: qhri Ar lvlanmadha Rao, S/o Shri A. Valmiki Naidu, pvt. Employee Rt/o Prajasri Gardens, 3'198, Bandlaguda, Keesar Mandal, R.R.Dist. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND 1.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(CRLRCMP . NO: 2467 OF 2011) Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. B MURALIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent No 2: S MUJTB KUMAR Counsel forthe Respondent No 1: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER 1. Smt. S.Usha Rani W/o Shri Andhavaram Manmadha Rao, Rl/o Flat No.103, Esteem House, H.No.06-03, 456/20, Dwarakapuri Colony, panjagutta, Hyderabad. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its public prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the H(7h Court may be pleased to stay the Order passed in M.P.No. 54 ot 20'11 in M.C.No.333 of 2010, dated 13.05.2011 on the file of the Hon'ble Addl. Metropolitan sessions Judge for the trial of JHCBB Case-cum-Addl. Family Court-cum-XXlll Addl. Chief Judge, Hyderabad. THE HONOURABLE DR.. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1661 of 2O11 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is preferred aggrieved by the Order dated 13-05 2011 passed by the learned VII Additional Chiel Judge, H1'derabad, in M.P.No.54 of 2O1 1 in M.C.No.333 of 2010. 02. When the maltcr- has been taken up for hearing, thc learned counscl lor the petitioner submitted that the matter has becomc infructuous. 03. The same is recorded. 04. In view of thc above submission, nothing survives to proceed with this Criminal Revision Case and the same is liable to be disnrissed. 05. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Therc is no order as to costs. I I 2 To, As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/. M. MANJU DEPUW REGIST R /ffRUE COPY// SECTION ICER 1. The Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the trail of JHCBB Case-Cum- Additional Family Court4um-XXlll Additional Chief Judge, Hyderabad. 2. One CC to SRl. B MURALIDHAR Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRl. S MUJIB KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRl. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies VH HIGH COURT DNR, J DATED: 2711012022 ORDER CRLRC.No.1661 ot 2011 Dismissing the Crl.R.C as infructuous ,-r9 gTATE Qt \ /i ,.] Ig lu\\ rm lr I W