IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2573 of 2011 SATISH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 414 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that one vehicle was seized which was parked in front of one Arvind Kumar Sharma, a seizure list witness disclosed the name of the petitioner. The petitioner has not claimed the vehicle in question. Moreover, for the same recovery earlier Sakurabad P.S. Case No. 05 of 2010 was also instituted and oral statement has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that except the aforesaid two cases registered for the same recovery no case is pending against the petitioner. Considering the fact that the petitioner’s name sprang up on the statement of seizure list witness and also the fact that nothing reflects that the vehicle in question belongs to the petitioner, let the 2 petitioner above named be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Kurtha (Manikpur)P.S. Case No. 16 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M.,Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P. C. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)