1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 678 OF 2011 Bezonbagh Pragatisheel Gruha Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. Vs. Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-op Societies and others. .......................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .......................................................................................................................................... Mr. S.K.Tambde, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. Bhoyar, AGP. for respondents 1 & 2. Mr. S.Borkar, Adv. For respondent no.3. CORAM : R. M.SAVANT, J. DATE : 14th JULY, 2011. The above petition takes exception to the order dated 29.11.2010 passed bythe Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Nagpur, by which order the appeal filed by the respondent herein came to be partly allowed and in the impugned order dated 7.4.2010 passed by the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies came to be quashed and set aside and the matter was remanded back to the Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies Nagpur-1 for de-novoo inquiry in the matter of the expulsion of the respondent no.3. The impugned order discloses that the said proceedings have been remanded back by the Divisional Joint Registrar, interalia on the ground that it is not clear as to whether the notices of the annual general meeting .....2/- 2 were sent and communicated to all the members of the society and opportunity was given to the appellant. The proceedings are also silent as to how many members of the society had received the notice for the annual general meeting and it is also not clear as to whether the society had followed the procedure for passing of resolution expelling a member which is to be passed in terms of Sec. 35 by a majority of ¾ of the members present and voting. In the above petition, an affidavit-in-reply has been filed by respondent no.3 wherein the attendance sheet in respect of the said meting which was held wherein the resolution was passed to expel the respondent no. 4 has been annexed. A perusal of the said attendance sheet prima facie raises suspicion as regards the signatures which are appearing against the persons who are said to have attended the said meeting and whose names are appearing in the said register. In my view, considering the said aspect as also the other aspects which have been mentioned and which have been reproduced herein above, no fault can be found with the order of remand. In that view of the matter, no case for interference is made out. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. On remand the Deputy Joint Register to decide the issue as expeditiously as possible and not later than 31st October, 2011. JUDGE Hirekhan ...../-