IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 21986 of 2006 Between: 1 Bandlamudi Venkateswara Rao S/o.Lakshmaiah R/o.Sreerampuram, H/o.Muchennapalli, Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District. 2 Nadella Chenna Kesava Rao S/o.Bhaskar rao R/o.Sreerampuram, H/o.Muchennapalli, Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Government of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Co-operation Department, SEcretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Gruhakalpa, Hyderabad. 3 The Dy. Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Nuzvid, Krishna District. 4 The Sreempuram Patel Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, Srirampuram, Reddygudem Mandal, Krishna District, rep. by its Secretary. 5 Atluri Venkata Subba rao S/o.not known to the Petitioner R/o.Sreerampuram, H/o.Muchennapalli, Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District. 6 Sk.Firurabi Atluri S/o.not known to the Petitioner R/o.Sreerampuram, H/o.Muchennapalli, Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District. 7 Midde Venkateswara Rao S/o.not known to the Petitioner R/o.Sreerampuram, H/o.Muchennapalli, Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District. 8 Veerla Phuspavathi S/o.not known to the Petitioner R/o.Sreerampuram, H/o.Muchennapalli, Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District. 9 Kilari Suryanarayana S/o.not known to the Petitioner R/o.Sreerampuram, H/o.Muchennapalli, Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District. 10 Morampudi Nageswara Rao S/o.not known to the Petitioner R/o.Sreerampuram, H/o.Muchennapalli, Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District. 11 Manikala Satyanarayana S/o.not known to the Petitioner R/o.Sreerampuram, H/o.Muchennapalli, Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District. 12 Gaddala Prema Raju S/o.not known to the Petitioner R/o.Sreerampuram, H/o.Muchennapalli, Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District. 13 Chillapalli Pullaiah S/o.not known to the Petitioner R/o.Sreerampuram, H/o.Muchennapalli, Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District. 14 Bellamkonda Ravi Kumar S/o.not known to the Petitioner R/o.Sreerampuram, H/o.Muchennapalli, Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District. 15 Devalla Ramulu S/o.not known to the Petitioner R/o.Sreerampuram, H/o.Muchennapalli, Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District. 16 Nadella Laxmi Narasamma S/o.not known to the Petitioner R/o.Sreerampuram, H/o.Muchennapalli, Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District. 17 Devalla Prasad S/o.not known to the Petitioner R/o.Sreerampuram, H/o.Muchennapalli, Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District. 18 Patibandla Ramachander Rao S/o.Venkayya R/o.Kunchanapalli Village, Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly writ of mandamus, declaring the Memo No.14146/Coop.V(1)/2006-1, dt. 6.10.2006 of the 1st respondent as without jurisdiction, illegal, arbitrary and contrary to section 76 of the A.P.C.S. Act, 1964 and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct the elections to the 4th respondent society forthwith and to pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT.BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 21986 of 2006 O R D E R: The petitioners herein, who claim to be the members of 4th respondent-Society ﬁled this writ petition seeking a declaration that the Government Memo, dated 06-10- 2006, under which the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 05-10-2006 superseding the Managing Committee of the Society and appointing Special Oﬃcer was stayed, is arbitrary and illegal. When the matter is taken up for consideration, on a vacate petition ﬁled by the respondent No.18, it is brought to the notice of this Court that as against the order of the 2nd respondent, dated 05-10-2006, the Managing Committee of the Society preferred O.A.No.78 of 2006 before the A.P.Co-operative Tribunal, Vijayawada and the same was allowed by order dated 19-06-2007 thereby setting aside the order of supersession dated 05- 10-2006. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Having regard to the subsequent events, nothing survives for adjudication on merits as on today. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 29-08-2008 KLP