Non-AppBcants: Versus 1) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. Np. 830/2011 ApRlicant: Gokul Ram S/o Firturam Kanwar Caste Kaawar (Schedulcd Tribe) aged about 40 years, R/o Chaipara Deragarh, Tahsil Sakti, District Jaajgir Champa (C.G.). Jaold Bai D/o Dhariram Gond W/o Premsingh Goxid, a.gsd about 46 years, R/o Garhgorhi, Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir-Chatapa (C.G.). 2) LaKhan Lal S/o Benirain, Caste Rathore, aged about 49 years, ^, R/o Deragarh, Tahsil Sakti District Janjgir Champa (C.G,). 3) StatCiOf Chliattisgarh tituough the District Magistrate Janjgir- Chasnpa (C.G.). 4) Sub Divisional Officer, Sakti, District Jaajgir-Champa (C.G.). 5) Additional Collector Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 6) Conunissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur(C.G.). 7) Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh Bilaspur(C.G.). 8) Sukhwara Bai Widow of Firturam Kauwar, Aged about 40 years, Caste Kaiiwar (Schedukd Tribe) R/o Charpara Deiagscrh, Talisil Sakti, District Jaajgir-Champa (C.G-). APPLICATIPN FOR RESTORATIQN OF THE WRIT PBTTTION (227| No. 3330/2011 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIAt. (SB :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Vivek Rafhore, Advocate for ttie petitioner. Siiri Suiait Jhanwar, P.L. for the State/respondents No. 3 to 6. Respondents No. 1, 2, 7 &8 not noticed. ORDBR (Passedon 02/12/2011) Heard the petition for restoratioa of writ petition (227) No. 3330/2011 disinissed for want ofnon-compUaace. Vide order dated .11/10/2011 it was directed to petitioner to pay cost of Rs. 1,000/- to responrfent No. 1 within 7 days and also directed that failing such petition shaU. be dismissed wifbout reference to the Court but r Z-- petitioner has failed to comply such order withiu stipulated time, in fhese circuiustances, I do not fiad aay ground for restoradon of petition. Consequenfly, petition far restoration is dismissed. However, petitioner is at liberty to file fi-esh if cause of action is siuvive. No oider as to costs. ——— — —— — Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^