THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Rev.C.R.P.M.P.(SR)No.27725 of 2012 in C.R.P.No.1431 of 2010 ORDER: This review miscellaneous petition is filed by respondents 1 to 4 in C.R.P.No.1431 of 2010. Respondents 1 and 2 herein filed the C.R.P., feeling aggrieved by dismissal of their application to appoint an Advocate-Commissioner to measure the suit schedule land in O.S.No.2024 of 2009 on the file of the II Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The C.R.P. was disposed of on 12.07.2010, upholding the order under revision, but leaving it open to the petitioners therein to approach the Authority under the A.P. Survey and Boundaries Act. It was also directed that as and when such application is filed, the concerned authority, shall take necessary steps in accordance with law and that it shall be open to respondents 1 and 2 herein to make the result of survey as part of record. The petitioners herein submit that the suit has since been dismissed for default, and still survey as observed by this Court in the orders in C.R.P.No.1431 of 2010 was sought to be conducted. According to them, a notice issued proposing to conduct survey was challenged in W.P.No.22834 of 2012 and that the same has been set aside. The petitioners further contend that on an earlier occasion, a Division Bench of this Court in its orders in W.P.No.19552 and 20534 of 2004, dated 26.05.2005, has taken the view that there is no land with the survey numbers as mentioned by respondents 1 and 2 herein. In the light of this, the petitioners submit that the orders passed by this Court, giving liberty to respondents 1 and 2, to get the land surveyed, deserves to be reviewed. Heard Sri T.Niranjan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri K.Raman, learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2. For all practical purposes, the revision filed by respondents 1 and 2 was dismissed, since the order challenged therein was upheld. However, a facility, which is otherwise available to any other citizen to get the land demarcated by approaching the authorities of the department of survey and land records, was left open. If the suit has already been dismissed, naturally not only the interlocutory orders passed therein, but also the orders that are passed in appeals or revisions, which arise out of such miscellaneous petitions, come to an end. Be that as it may, the order passed by this Court in the CRP, cannot be construed as having effect of expressing any view on the merits of the matter. Further, whenever survey is proposed to be conducted, independent of any orders of the Court, it would always be competent for the concerned parties, to put forward their contentions, which may include the findings recorded by any Courts or authorities, on earlier occasions. Hence, the Review C.R.P.M.P. is disposed of, directing that the order passed by this Court in the C.R.P., shall not be construed as having the effect of expressing any view on the merits of the matter, and that it shall be open to the parties to put forward their respective contentions, as and when survey is conducted. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dated:29.01.2013 GJ THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Rev.C.R.P.M.P.(SR)No.27725 of 2012 in C.R.P.No.1431 of 2010 Date:29.01.2013 GJ