1 wp8786-09.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8786 OF 2009 Bapu Nana Kamble .. Petitioner versus Uttam Panu Kamble & Ors .. Respondents Mr.Umesh R. Mankapure for the petitioner. None for the respondents. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 3rd August 2011. P.C.: . Heard Mr.Mankapure appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Perused the impugned orders. Essentially they pertain to a controversy in relation to the mutation entries. By themselves, they do not decide any issue of right, title and interest of the petitioner in the immovable property. The civil suits are already filed and they are pending. Needless, therefore, to state that the authorities under the Land Revenue Code will abide by the adjudication of the competent Civil Court. The competent Civil Court will decide the issue of the parties’ right, title and interest on the basis of the oral and documentary 2 wp8786-09.doc evidence placed before it. There is no apprehension that the observations and findings in the impugned order will bind the Civil Court in any manner. In addition, because of the liberty given by the Commissioner in the impugned order, the petitioner is otherwise protected. There is no need for interference in the writ jurisdiction. Petition is disposed off accordingly. No costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)