IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1404 of 2009 BALRAM SINGH, SON OF LATE YAMUNA SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – BUDHA CHAK, P.S. – FATUHA, DISTRICT - PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY-CUM- COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RECOURCES , GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY EDUCATION, BUDHMARG, PATNA 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, PATNA, BIHAR 4. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, PATNA 5. THE INCHARGE HEADMASTER, GOVT OF MIDDLE SCHOOL, SWALPUR, PATNA ----------- 2. 08.05.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the title of the writ petition. No one appears on behalf of the State and nor any counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was Middle School Teacher and retired on 31st August 2006 from Government Middle School, Sawalpur. However, he has not received the retiral dues till date despite sanctioning the pensionary benefit like gratuity and commutation of pension for which the authority has already issued by the office of the Accountant General as contained in Annexure-1, 2 and 3 respectively. He further submits that petitioner could not get the payment as the required non-payment certificate is - 2 - not being sent by the Head Master of the concerned school who is respondent no. 6. He further submits that petitioner has submitted a representation before the respondent no. 6 for redressal of his grievances dated 10th of July 2008 as contained in Annexure-4. Notwithstanding the above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the claim as raised in the petition, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 3 within a period of four weeks alongwith certified copy of the present order. In case such representation is filed, respondent no. 3 shall consider the same and dispose it of by reasoned order expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months on receipt of such representation. Upon such consideration, if the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, the above respondent shall simultaneously issue necessary orders so that the grievances of the petitioner, as raised in the representation could be redressed without delay in the light of the order passed by him on such representation. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)