/"s^'\ I "^l^ 1 ^ !>- V .9 (o, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No.315Sof2(ffl6 Pstitioner Nirgun Das Manikpuri, aged about 47 years, Son of Shri Gyan Das Kflanikpuri, OccupaBon - Ssr/ice, Presently woridng as Patwari, Patwari Circfe No.19, Mopka, Revenue Cirde Bilaspur, Tahsi! and District Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus Respondente 1. Stete of Chhaffisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Deputy Secretaiy, Oepartment of Revenus, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (p.G.). 3. The Commissionsr, (Land Records), Raipur (C.G.) 4. The CoHector, DlsWct BHaspur (C.G.5 SB; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Shri Bhaskar PyasS, Advocate for the petifioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy Govt. Advoate forthe respondente. Shri T. K. Tiv/ari and Shri Om P. Sahu, Advocatss for the Intervener. ORDER (Passed on this 13 day of Aprii, 2007) 1. The peStioner, who te woridng as Patwari, has chailenged the validify and fegaiity of the order dated 23.6.20(^ (Annexure P/1), vAerein the petitioner wss transferred front Mopka, District - Biiaspur to Disfrict - Raigarh. The impugned ordsr has been amended by the subsequem order dafed 7 Juiy, 2U36 (Annexure A/1) has bsen amsneted and ttie pstitioner has been trsnsferred from Mopka, Disfrict Bilaspur to Patwari Haika No. 20, Lormi i.e. within the same district. ——— 1 0' Thakur 2. The question involved in the petiSon is that the ssnfority of the Patwari te maintained at district level and as such the petitioner cannot be transferred out of the disftict, affecting his seniorify. 3. In view of the subsequent order daied 7t Jufy, 2006, mis petition has bscome infructuous. 4. It is according^' dismisssd, as having become infructaous. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge