1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3046 OF 2009 Nivrutti s/o Dnyanoba Dhavale .. PETITIONER VERSUS Balaji s/o Rangnath Peddewad & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. C.V. Thombre, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.D. Gunale, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Respondent no. 3 served. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 20 th APRIL, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Instant writ petition can be disposed of in terms of the interim order passed by this court on 17-7-2009. 2 Application tendered by the petitioner in a pending suit claiming restrain order against the original defendants / respondents herein was allowed by the trial court on 24-9-2008. Respondents / original defendants preferred appeal being Misc. Civil Appeal no. 68/2008 which came to be heard and disposed of by Adhoc District Judge – 2, Latur who was pleased 2 to allow the same in view of judgment and order dt. 23-3-2009 thereby setting aside order passed by the trial court granting temporary injunction in favour of the plaintiff. Order passed by the first appellate court in Misc. Civil Appeal no. 68/2008 is subject matter of challenge in this petition at the instance of original plaintiff / petitioner herein. 3 This court while directing issuance of notice on respondents / original defendants directed the parties to maintain status quo in respect of possession. Interim order passed by this court on 17-7-2009 is operative till this date. In this view of the matter, without going into the merits of the controversy between the parties, the ends of justice would be met if the trial court is directed to decide the pending suit bearing Regular Civil Suit no. 102/2007 as expeditiously as possible preferably by the end of December 2010. The parties to the litigation shall maintain status quo in the meanwhile. Petition is accordingly disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp3046.09.odt