WP(C) 6561/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE U B SAHA In this writ petition the petitioner made a prayer to direct the respondents to comply with the order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Kamru p at Guwahati in MAC Case No.1638/2000 within reasonable time. Heard Mr. S K Jain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Ms U Baruah, learned Standing Counsel of Assam State Transport Corporation, who raised the question of maintainability of the instant writ petition. Mr. Jain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in W P(C) No.1489/2008 this Court considered the similar nature of dispute between th e parties and disposed the aforesaid writ petition on the basis of the undertaki ng given by the respondents and it would be proper for this Court to pass an ord er on the same line. Upon hearing the learned counsel of both the parties and going through t he record, this Court is of the considered opinion that the instant writ petitio n is not maintainable as the dispute in question in the instant writ petition is pending before the Execution Court. More so, we cannot allow a litigant to conv ert the Writ Court into an Execution Court, when there is a particular procedure prescribed for execution of a decree and/or award passed by a competent Court. It further appears from the order dated 11.12.2004 that the said order was passe d on the basis of concession given by the learned Standing Counsel of the Assam State Transport Corporation. In the instant case the learned Standing Counsel di d not concede, rather raised the question of maintainability. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed. However, dismissal of the writ petition would not be a bar for the petit ioner to approach the Executive Court, if so advised.