1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16007 of 2011 1.P.KOTTAISAMY 2.KARUTHAPANDI 3.ARUL ROZAREE 4.V.S.JEBAMALAI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 4 Vs 1.THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE LAND GRAB PREVENTION SPECIAL CELL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, DINDIGUL 2.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE LAND GRAB PREVENTION SPECIAL CELL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, DINDIGUL 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DINDIGUL DISTRICT, DINDIGUL 4.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE LAND GRAB PREVENTION SPECIAL CELL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, DINDIGUL ... RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS For Petitioner : M/S. N.DILIP KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR. C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 465, 468 and 420 IPC and seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that only petition enquiry is pending against the petitioners on the basis of the complaint preferred by one V.S.Einstein Paul. 3.However, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners were frequently called for interrogation by the respondent police and as such they are having apprehension of arrest. 4.It is seen that only petition enquiry is pending against the petitioners on the basis of the complaint preferred by one V.S.Einstein Paul. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 petitioners are having apprehension of arrest as they have been called for interrogation by the respondent police frequently, this Court is constrained to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners 1, 2 and 4 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 5.30 p.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter, they shall be available for interrogation as and when required and the third petitioner being a lady, she shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKOTTAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL 3 THE INSPECOT OF POLICE, LAND GRAB PREVENTION SPECIAL CELL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT , DINDIGUL 4 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, LAND GRAB PREVENTION SPECIAL CELL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, DINDIGUL 5 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, DINDIGUL 6 THE SUB INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, LAND GRAB PREVENTION SPECIAL CELL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, DINDIGUL 7 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. N.DILIP KUMAR Advocate SR.No.44430 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16007 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 TR : 20.12.2011: 2p/9c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/