FA No.518 of 2011 Smt. Janki Verma Brajbhushan Verma 19.09.2011. Shri G.S.Thakur, counsel for the appellant. This appeal is filed under Section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by which the judgment and decree dated 17.4.2009 passed by the 6th Additional District Judge (FTC), Chhatarpur in Hindu Marriage Case No.18-A/2008 has been assailed. From the perusal of the aforesaid,it is apparent that the appellant has challenged the compromise decree under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act which was passed by the trial Court on the basis of a joint petition filed by the parties. This appeal is filed solely on the ground that at the time of passing of judgment, no permanent alimony has been provided to the appellant or the appellant is entitled for payment of Rs.5.00 lacs from the respondent. This appeal is barred by 712 days. In the application, it is stated that the appellant was ill and she could not contact the counsel and when she recovered from illness, she contaced to the counsel and this appeal has been filed after such delay. No particulars in respect of ailment or the period of ailment has been given in the application. Apart from this, no medical certificate or medical papers have been filed to show that in fact the appellant was sick for a period of 712 days. In absence of particulars, when a compromise decree has been passed between the parties, we are not satisfied that the appellant has made out a case for condonation of delay. In view of the aforesaid, we do not find any justification even for issuance of notice to the other side for condonation of delay. FA No.518 of 2011 Smt. Janki Verma Brajbhushan Verma In view of the aforesaid, I.A.No.9372/2011 is dismissed without notice to the other side and accordingly this appeal is also dismissed. So far as contention of the appellant that she is entitled for permanent alimony is concerned, the appellant is free to agitate the matter before the appropriate forum in accordance with law, if advised so. With the aforesaid liberty, this appeal is dismissed with no other as to costs. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt. Vimla Jain) Judge Judge JLL