IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7592 of 2008 Between: Smt. Chinthala @ Gajula Balamma, W/o. Rajaiah, R/o. Komuravelli Village, Cherial Revenue Mandal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Endowments, Hyderabad. 3 The Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department, Warangal Zone, Warangal District. 4 The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Warangal. 5 Sri Mallikarjuna Swamy Devasthanam, Komuravelly Village of Cherial Mandal, Warangal District, Rep by its Executive Officer .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in dispossessing/demolishing petition house property bearing No. 8-31 in Komuravelli Gram Panchayat, Cherial Mandal, Warangla District, pending her Revision dt. 05-2007 with the 1st respondent is illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14, 21 and 300A of constitution of India besides violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess/demolish the house property and bangle store bearing No. 8-31 in Komuravelli Gram Panchayat, Cherial Mandal, Warangal District. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.PARSA ANANTH NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for Respondents 1 to 4: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for Respondent No. 5: SRI CH.SATISH KUMAR. The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.7592 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner challenges the proceedings initiated by the respondents for evicting her from the property bearing No.8-31 of Komuravelli Gram Panchayat, Cherial Mandal, Warangal District. 2. On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the 5th respondent Devasthanam, it emerges that the petitioner suﬀered an order, dated 26.08.2006, in O.A.No.75 of 2006. The petitioner had alternative remedy by way of an appeal under Section 92 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987. It is stated that the petitioner has since availed the remedy by way of an appeal, along with an application to condone the delay in ﬁling the said appeal. Therefore, this writ petition is not maintainable. 3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue the alternative remedy of appeal, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J 05.11.2008 v v