IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.347 OF 2003 PETITION NO.347 OF 2003 PETITION NO.347 OF 2003 Girish Kantilal Shah...............Petitioner Vs. Enforcement Directorate & Anr.....Respondents Mr. V.K. Shah, for the petitioner Mr. Y.R. Mishta with Mr. D.A. Dubey, for Respondents CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. F.I. REBELLO & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 15th March, 2005 : 15th March, 2005 : 15th March, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . It is the case of the petitioner that he himself is a partner. It is his further case that in some arbitral proceedings between the parties some observations came to be made by the Arbitrator. Based on that the petitioner wants this Court to direct the respondents to make investigation. 2. We do not think this would be a fit case for this Court to exercise the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court in the facts of the case. No interference called for. Petition rejected. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (S.P. (S.P. (S.P. KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.) KUKDAY, J.)