H§GH ccum" OF cHHAwa$GAI§H: Biggggg writ Petitiqg gs 445g of 2og§ ?eti$icn_§l Ku. Usha Mahcbiya, DIG. Late Rameshwar Prasad Mahcbiya, aged about 48 years, Secretary, Man Pawer and Manning Department, DKS. Bhawah, Raipur (CG). 2. Directar, Empioyment and Training, Wemen Poiyiechnic Campus, Bairan Bazaar, Raipur (CG}» (Writ Petition under Adicie 226 of the Constitution of Endia‘) SB: Hoa’bie Mr. $atish K. Agnihotti, J. ééEf?”"”‘";§Er‘§‘§"s”f’Kéé‘ri'ii {iiéfh EHEI"Ji?‘6&'Eiéé&Enu§h; )tidkikiééféé‘fEr" étie‘ W ’ petiticner, $hri PK. Bhaduri, Panei Lawyer far the respondenisistate OWL 0R3ER (PaS$ed on thi$ 13‘“ day 0f Augugt, 2008) With me cansent 0f the parties, the matter Es; taken up for hearing finaliy. 2) Learned counse! appearing for the petitiener submits that the peti'tiener was initialw appemted as Lower Division Cierk: at L'T.i., Burg on the pay scaie of Rs. 51 5.. 1G675-15-800!- for the period of six months on ad hoc basis against the sanctioned vacant posts, by order dated 26—54 Q86 (Annexure Pi’i) The services of the petitioner were continued with ar‘tiiiciai break of‘ two or three days in service and worged oontinuousiytiiithe date of h r regoiarizarion. 3) The similariy situated empioyees have approached the State Administrative Tribunai (for short, “SAW in {3riginai Aopiication No. 1Q79 of 199i {Satish Kumar Manoioi Vs. State or state Madhya Pradesh and aoother} praying for aimiiar relief as sought for in this petition. Learned coonsei appearing for the petitioner submits that this case may aiso be disposed of in the same terms and oonditions. 4) Shri Arun Sao, teamed oounsei appearing for the respondentsista‘re submits that the case of the petitioner wooid be considered in’tne tight of the order of the SAT as ai’ore stated. after verifying the facts of the case. W Grade —H, , NIL Burg, D§stt (CG). Vemus Résgonden‘is 1‘ State of 5) he Earned ceunsei appearing far the State, the petition is a§mwed in the same terms Le‘, {f the Committee Wide her suifabke farthe post V in View of me fcregoing and categoréca£ statement made byt in ail aspects, she shalt be reguiarézed 0n the pest held by her and shan a§so pay her salary on regular scam. She shaft be entitled to eaiaw for the dates on break in service. Her seniarity shelf be counted from the dates er” her initiai appointment. Sdl- I Satish K. Agnihotn Judge