IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 20953 of 2010 Date of decision:27.7.2010 Harvinder Kaur Petitioner vs. State of Punjab Respondent Present: Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner claims that there is absolutely no material, available on the record warranting framing of charges u/s 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC, in a case registered at P.S. Civil Lines, Amritsar. It is contended that even though it was admitted by the P.P. that there is no evidence against the petitioner, the trial court has opted to frame charge against the petitioner. The legality and propriety of the order framing charges contrary to the record can be tested by the revisional court. The petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy u/s 397 and 399 Cr.P.C. It is contended that the petitioner, being a lady working in the office of DTO Amritsar, her personal appearance may be exempted during trial. The said relief can be claimed by the petitioner by moving an application before the trial court. In case any such application is filed, the same may be allowed subject to any conditions imposed by the trial court. July 27 ,2010 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE