IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.5816 of 2009 Decided on : 09.10.2009 Asha Rani & others ... Petitioners versus Dalip Singh & others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Jaideep Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed against the order of the Courts below dismissing the objections filed by the petitioners to decree obtained by the predecessor-in-interest of respondent No.7 against the predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners. Both the Courts below have held that the petitioners having purchased the property during the lis, would be governed by the doctrine of lis pendens and cannot be held to urge that they were not parties to the suit between the original principals. Learned counsel has not been able to deny this seminal fact. The argument that the person, who has filed the execution application is not the son of Ujjagar Singh, does not carry much water since as many as 7 legal representatives of Ujjagar Singh are parties. Thus, it has to be held that the decree being executed is for the benefit of the estate of Ujjagar Singh. CR No.5816 of 2009 -2- Apart from that, the question of entitlement of Dalip Singh to file the petition, is a pure question of fact and the Courts below have found that he is LR of Ujjagar Singh. In this view of the matter, no ground is made out to interfere with the orders of the Executing Court. Consequently, this revision petition is dismissed. No costs. October 09, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE