CWP No.4814 of 2011.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.4814 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.03.2011 **** Arvinder Pal Kaur . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Raman Mohinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG Punjab Mr. OP Narang, Advocate for respondent No.3 **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner is aggrieved by the notice dated 29.09.2009 (Annexure P1) issued under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short, ‘the Act’). Though in the ordinary course, the petitioner would have been relegated to the alternative remedy to approach the DRT at an appropriate stage, however, she has come up with a fair stand and is ready to deposit the Rs.1 lac within one month besides paying double the monthly instalments. CWP No.4814 of 2011.doc - 2 – (2). Counsel for respondent No.3 has also been persuaded to accept the above-stated arrangement. (3). The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the following directions:- (i). The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.1 lac within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order; (ii). Respondent No.3 shall thereafter inform the petitioner the original amount of instalment as well as double thereof within two weeks; (iii). On receipt of the above information, the petitioner shall start depositing the enhanced instalment from May 2011 onwards which shall be payable on or before the 10th day of every calendar month. (iv). In case the petitioner fails to comply with the directions No.(i) or (iii), respondent No.3 shall be at liberty to proceed against her under the Act in accordance with law. (v). However, if the petitioner complies with the above directions and continues to pay the monthly instalments, the Deputy Commissioner, Patiala as well as other respondents are directed not to take any coercive step against the petitioner. (4). Disposed of accordingly. Dasti. 25.03.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge