caf3240-11 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3240 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 19487 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. ..... Ms. Tanu Khatri i/b. Mr. Sandesh D. Patil for the applicants. Mr. Ajit Nair for respondent Nos.1 and 2. ..... CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : OCTOBER 18, 2011. P.C.: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicants and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 and 3. Perusal of the application shows that the delay of more than 300 days has been explained. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents opposed the application. As the delay has been explained, sufficient cause is made for condonation of delay. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (A.S.OKA, J.)