In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh C.W.P. No. 15951 of 2006 Date of Decision: October 9, 2006 Surinder Kaur …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI PRESENT: Mr. J.B. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. JUDGMENT M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral) The impugned order dated 24.11.1999 (P-2) is the subject matter of challenge in the instant petition. The petitioner has prayed for quashing the aforementioned order with further direction to the respondents to reinstate her in service with continuity and all other benefits including back wages and seniority. It has also been prayed that direction be issued to the respondents to allow her to continue in service till the regular appointment is made. The respondents have passed the impugned order in view of the fact that the period of appointment of the petitioner i.e. 89 days has come to an end, as is evident from the impugned order dated 24.11.1999 (P-2). CWP No. 15951 of 2006 The aforementioned order is wholly supported by the observation by a Constitution Bench of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Umadevi, (2006) 4 SCC 1. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (M.M.S. BEDI) October 9, 2006 JUDGE Pkapoor 2