COURT OF CHHA'm‘ISGARH AT‘BILASPU [CHHATTISGAR ITION S No. aom. CF W //L @ g IN THE HIGH i R m WRIT PET () g gm PITIONE 1 anoh'ar LaJ Kurre so 'of n' Ra Sig urre, aged aout 52 ears oring as Uer Division Tehe ovt Mlddle School Devarbod Blc hllalarh ucat10n lstrlc Bl p, aoda Bazar, Dlstrlct Ralur ttisar / M. , n Sh m \nh K b y, wk pp acr G ok Bg d Dt Chhagh. a vrsus ‘ e /1'' . g i J T ! \ T , : X T T i T T V T T x I T T T ERnte esponde f S Tugh tate of Chhattisgarh, hro ecretary Education Deatmen S hawan, Ralu hhattlsgar Dlstnct Edcatlon Officer, Bal azar, Distrct Raipu hattlsarh Jomt D1rector, Accounts, Treasu T and Pens10n ‘ Rp a1ur ) ETR S prt, D K B pr Ch L g oda B i r, Chg /3 ry , Dlstnct ./2 . , TRalpur, C.G. ..Q~....c.§‘2....§>§e.;...§3.§1‘[i&200 an?“ m (Wm WWW“ mwfaih‘ WWW mmm SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P 07.10.2010 Shri C.J.K.Rao, counsel f Shn' Praveen Das, Dy. GA Counssl for the petitionex entitled to benem of two advam J having passed B.T.I. examinatio own cost. It is submitwd that t1 peu'tion is no longer resjntegra decided by the Hon’ble Supren Saxena Vs. State of M.P. & Ors It is further submitted th similar View in its order dated t 6257/2008. Counsel for the petJ‘ order dated 29.4.20 10 passed 1 wherein relying upon the judgmc ease ;of Asha Saxena (supra) and in another Wn't Appeal No. 8 issued for consideration of the increments as per circular dated of Madhya Pradesh, after veridcs petition. Counsel for the State sub: would also be considered on the the petitioner. . for the State. l submits that the petitioner is :e increments on account of he a before his appointment at his le issue involved in the present and the same has been nnally ie Court in the case of Asha . 2009 (Immwk (so) 59. it this Court has also taken a 5.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No. tioner further submits that. the n Writ Appeal NO. 124/2009, ant of the Supieme Court in the the order passed by this Court 7/2009, diieotions have been ‘case tbr grant of two advance 21.9. 1974 issued by the State Ltion of the facts pleaded in the nits that case of the petitioner same lines. " XI-HC 78 mm (Wu) warm ' WWW mmm petiiionlis disposed of with a In View of abova, the dimction to the respondcnt a orities to decida the claim of the petiiioner for gxant of two a ance increments as per circular dated 21.9.1974 issuedby vermcation of the facts pleade eight weeks from today. . Sdl- , Pritinker Diwaker Judge e State of Madhya Pradesh after 1 in the pet'm'on Within a pen'od of /"L