Crl. Misc No. M-13821 of 2011 (O&M) ****** Ashok Kumar vs. State of Haryana Present : Mr. A.S. Sullar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sushil Gautam, Advocate for the complainant Ms. Preet Chaudhary, AAG Haryana ******* The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 124, dated 2.9.2010, registered under Sections 323, 307, 506, 34 IPC at Police Station Bilaspur, District Yamunanagar. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner has now been in custody for 9 months and no injury was attributed to him in the FIR. Learned AAG Haryana on instructions from ASI Om Parkash has brought to the notice of the Court that trial is almost concluded and the case is now fixed for 28.7.2011 before the trial Court and last three witnesses have been summoned for that date. Learned counsel for the complainant has argued against the grant of bail stating that in deposition the role of the petitioner has been given in great detail. In the circumstances without commenting on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner. Bail to the satisfaction of trial Court. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) July 13, 2011 JUDGE reena