IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 19TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 30TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 3887 of 2008(K) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ K.T.THOMAS, S/O.K.M.THOMAS (LATE), KIZHAKKEKKARA, KANJIRAPPUZHA P.O., MANNARKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.SOMAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI. 2. JOINT DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, INTELLIGENCE COCHIN REGIONAL UNIT, 40/522, KEETHOTH ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, COCHIN-682 025. 3. P.K.UMMER, S/O.MOITHEEN HAJI, PALATHUMKANDATHIL HOUSE, DARSALAM, KAVUNGAL, MALAPPURAM. 4. MOIDEEN HAJI, S/O.LATE KUNHALAN HAJI, PALATHUMKANDATHIL HOUSE, MANKAGA AMSOM, PADINJATTE MURI, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.S.G. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 3887 OF 2008 ----------------------------- DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2008 J U D G M E N T The prayer sought for in this writ petition is to direct the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exhibits P1 to P3 complaints. The Standing Counsel on instructions submits that it is not for the 2nd respondent to take cognizance of the allegations in the nature of those contained in Exhibits P1 to P3. It is stated that it is the Revenue Enforcement Directorate who are to be approached if at all the petitioner has any grievance. Since the petitioner's representations are not addressed to the competent authority mentioned above, this writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach the appropriate authorities. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. dsn