IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2077 of 2010 1. ISRAIL MIAN SON OF ISLAM MIAN 2. ZAHIR MIAN SON OF SALAMAT MIAN 3. IBRAHIM MIAN SON OF UMDA MIAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.2606 of 2010 1. GANORI MIAN @ QUEDDUS S/O LATE SANIBAR MIAN 2. IMTIYAJ MIAN S/O HANIF MIAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 2.2.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners were arrested in the present case six months after the occurrence when the dog squad entered the house of the petitioner and house hold articles of common use were recovered, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody since November, 2009 and December, 2009 respectively, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Araria in Narpatganj P.S.case No.284 of 2008 (G.R.No.2530 of 2008), subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in - 2 - the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse of bail and (iii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )