IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2640 of 2011 DILIP SHAO @ DILIP KUMAR SHAO, SON OF SHRI PARIKHA SHAO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 10.03.2011 Vakalatnama is filed on behalf of the informant. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that the petitioner was identified by the victim boy in course of Test Identification Parade. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case on account of some enmity between him as well as the informant, who happens to be close relative of the petitioner. He also raised some questions in respect of prosecution story but I am not, at all, convinced with his submission. It is a very heinous crime of kidnapping of a six year old child. I do not think it proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Amba P.S. Case No. 138 of 2008 stands rejected. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )