IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.5611 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 14.9.2010 Harish Chander Ganesh ....Petitioner Versus Sabir ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Gorakh Nath, Advocate with Mr.Rahul Vats, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. There is no legal infirmity in the impugned order as the Appellate Authority in its discretion has directed the operation of the impugned order before it to be stayed subject to payment of Rs.15,000/- per month as mesne profits for the use and occupation of the premises. There is thus no reason to interfere with the discretion which has been exercised by the Appellate Authority while passing the impugned order, which apparently is not unjustifiable. Dismissed. 14.9.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss