IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15084 of 2011 Lal Sah S/O Late Dev Narayan Sah R/O Vill.- Satdhara, P.S.-Rajnagar, Distt.-Madhubani. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Block Development Officer, Rajnagar, Madhubani. 3. The S.D.O. Sadar, Madhubani. ---------------------------------- 2 18.10.2011. The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer seeks quashing of the order dated 4.8.2011, passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Madhubani, whereby he has been directed to refund the value of 934 quintal undistributed rice allotted to him under S.G.R. Yojana/FFW at the A.P.L. rate of Rs.913.60 per quintal. Petitioner also seeks quashing an order dated 16.8.2011, issued by Block Development Officer, Rajnagar directing him for depositing the price of rice at the APL rate. The petitioner submits that he was allotted 1527 quintal rice, out of which he distributed 1522 quintal rice and only 5 quintal of rice remained in his store. He further submits that 129 quintal rice allowed to him was not supplied by the BSFC. Learned State counsel submits that the submission of the petitioner is subject to the verification. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after 2 noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern the instant writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection, as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would deposit the value of entire 5 quintal rice at the rate of Rs.10/- per kilogram, or the rice itself in its present form within two months. If the petitioner files a representation in respect of his grievance before respondent no.3, the same would be disposed of within further ten weeks. Till then no coercive steps would be taken against him. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)