Review Petition No. 46 of 2009 14.09.2009 Present: Mr. Naresh Kumar Sood, counsel for the petitioner. Review Petition No. 46 of 2009 As far as the review petition is concerned, we are of the considered view that all arguments raised by the petitioner have been taken note of while disposing of the same. There is no error apparent on the record of the case. Therefore, the review petition is liable to be dismissed. Mr. Naresh Kumar Sood, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in a similar matter being CWP No. 490 of 1997 titled Chura Mani Vs. Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board, even though the petition was dismissed, the Chairman of the Board was directed to examine the petitioner’s case and to consider what duties should be assigned to him. Looking into the background of the case and keeping in view the nature of duties performed by the petitioner till date, the Chairman Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board is directed to examine the matter and decide what duties are to be assigned to the petitioner in future. We make it clear that we are not indicating the nature of duties to be assigned by the Chairman while deciding the matter. With the aforesaid observations, the review petition is disposed of. (Deepak Gupta) Judge (Surinder Singh) Judge September 14, 2009 *BRB*