IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43349 of 2009 PADAM BAHADUR CHHATRI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 07.12.2009 Heard. The petitioner was found in possession of 970 grams of heroin by the Shasastra Seema Bal while he was crossing into water some where in Shishabari bridge in the district of Madhubani. The contention is that the two accused persons, named in the F.I.R., were allowed to go scot free and the belongings of those two persons were transplanted upon this petitioner so as to justify his arrest. Further contention was that no copy of seizure memo was given to the petitioner and further that the seized substance was heroin is yet to be confirmed. There is no reason for the informant to have falsely implicated the present petitioner who was quite aged and who could be innocent unless he was found in possession of narcotic substance. It is too early to jump to a conclusion that it was not the narcotic substance before receiving a report from the Forensic Science Laboratory. Considering the submission, I am not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner on bail. If the petitioner so feels he may renew his prayer for bail after submission of report from the Forensic Science Laboratory. Petition is dismissed. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J ) BTiwary/