: 1 : ps-19-11=.sxw USJ IN THE PARSI MATRIMONIAL COURT AT BOMBAY PARSI SUIT NO. 19 OF 2011 Ayeshah Hormuz Pardiwalla .. Plaintiff no.1 v/s. Hormuz Cali Pardiwalla .. Defendant no.2 ......... Ms. A.S. Khushrushani for plaintiff nos. 1 and 2. ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J DATE : 22nd AUGUST, 2011. P.C. : 1. The plaintiff no.1 and plaintiff no.2 have filed this petition for divorce as per Section 32-B of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936. The plaintiff no.1 and plaintiff no.2 started staying separately from July, 2010. The petition is filed on 10th August, 2011. Learned advocate for the plaintiff no.1 and plaintiff no.2 has filed affidavits of both the plaintiffs respectively. The said affidavits are shown to plaintiff no.1 and plaintiff no.2. They admit their respective signatures and both of them state that affidavit affirmed by the respective persons is correctly affirmed. Both of them pray for decree in terms of the consent terms. : 2 : ps-19-11=.sxw 2. There is no issue from the said wedlock. Plaintiff no.1 and plaintiff no.2 have arrived at a decision that none of them shall claim maintenance against each other and exchange of articles is already done. This is stated in paragraph 10 of the petition. Both of them have informed the Court that efforts of settlement have failed and that is how they were required to arrive at a decision to have divorce by mutual consent. 3. I am satisfied that the requirements of provisions of Section 32-B of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 are fulfilled. Parties are entitled to divorce. Hence, following decree is passed. DECREE (i) There shall be decree in terms of prayer clause (a). (ii) Since parties have waived maintenance, there is no question of order of maintenance to be granted in favour of any of the parties. (iii) There shall be no order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)