1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application No.30 of 2011 [Anil Motilal Varma & others Vs. State of Mah.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. A. B. Patil, Adv., for the applicants. Mr. M.J. Khan, APP for respondent no.1. ---- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 18th March, 2011. 1. This is a Criminal Application under Section 482, Criminal Procedure Code. 2. Petitioners are aggrieved being arrayed as accused in the charge-sheet dated 24th June, 2010 arising out of Crime No. 97/2010 for alleged commission of offence under Sections 307, 143, 147, 148, 149, 504 and 427 of Indian Penal Code. 3. Heard learned Adv. Mr. A.B. Patil for the applicants-petitioners and learned APP Mr. M.J. Khan for respondent. 2 4. According to learned Adv., for the applicants, neither the contents of FIR, nor the conclusions summarized in the charge-sheet do describe commission of offence under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code. 5. The point urged in submission is summarized as follows:- The weapons of assault described in the charge-sheet at Page Nos. 44 and 45 of the application paper- book do not disclose assault by deadly weapons and intention to kill. 6. This Court has perused the FIR as well as Final Report. 7. The deadly weapons described in the charge-sheet are iron pipe and sticks and use thereof with intention to kill. 8. The description, as seen and spelt out from the contents of charge-sheet without any exertion does adequately describe the use of deadly weapons. Intention to commit murder is also explicit. 9. Applicants have, therefore, failed to make out a case for quashing of FIR. 3 10. In the result, petition is dismissed. Judge |Hedau|