-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1906 OF 2010 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 538 OF 2010 Amrutben Bhimsi Karia and others ...Petitioners versus The Municipal Corpn. Of Gr. Mumbai and others ...Respondents And M/s. Dattani Constructions and another ...Applicants Mr. Pradeep Sancheti, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mr. P.M. Shah, for the petitioners. Ms. K.R. Punjabi for the respondent-Corporation. Mr. D.H. Mehta with Mr. D. Mehta, instructed by D.M. Legal Associates for the applicants. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR , JJ. DATE: DECEMBER 21, 2010. P.C. On 20th December, 2010 we passed an order adjourning the matter to 18th January, 2011 and permitted the Corporation to act in accordance with law. At the oral request on the part of the counsel appearing for the petitioner, the matter is again placed today for admission as the said order was passed in the absence of the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Sancheti, learned senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners, states that after filing of this petition, there is a subsequent development as the -2- Corporation has passed a fresh order on 27th September, 2010 asking the petitioners to remove the unauthorised structure. This order has not been impugned in the present petition. Learned counsel fairly states that he would like to withdraw this petition with a view to make appropriate representation in connection with the subject order passed by the Corporation on all available points in accordance with law. The petitioners will make the said representation within three days from today. If any representation is made within the stipulated time, it is for the Corporation to decide the same in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of representation. On merits, we are not expressing any opinion as the petitioners are permitted to withdraw the petition with a view to make representation in view of the subsequent development. Till the decision is taken and the communication thereof to the petitioner, the interim order granted earlier in the writ petition continues to operate. We may clarify that it is not obligatory for the Corporation to give any personal hearing to the petitioners as it is not the requirement of law. Petition and the Motion are accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.