^^sss .^ :"- ^lii 1 IN THE fflGH GOUI^ < JI^ICA^URE AT JAKA WRIT PETITION W.P. Nb. ^M/s.jIe^wanUdhyog-l^'^^ Akasii 0angaCcmmercial(Cornplex •Bhilai^r11 -•i'; .'. ,: ;Y';-/:^1/-: -- E5istt.DURG. ^ :: • - ^..^' .;/.:'' ^^ 6f 199 •I1.. 2: 3. .VERSUS, -.e • . ...^'.-: •. . : •. •• . ^ : /'- -•• • ^ • , The State ofM.P. throughte , Secr^tary, Commerciat Tax Deptfc yallabh Bhawan. BHOPALrM.P.) The Comimssioner of Commercial Tax M.P. INDORE. : '• ,:•••,•••:..,'... Asstt. Sales Tax Officer Circle'2 ,•' .. ' -. ; •, ••'.^-,'. '-. DURG. - ^: : " • 1 :. ,: . IPETmG^ER. Writ Petitioii iinder article 226/ 22^ ofGclnstitiriloirofIn S%)NE)ENTS.:.-/ la. .1-... H IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmQN NQ. 445 OF 1999 ^r Petjtjoner Versus Respondent M/s. Jeewan Udhyog The State of M.P. & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTiCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTSTUTION OF SNDIA (SB : Hon»bleIVIr. Satlsh K: Agnihotri, J.) Present:- None for the petitioner. Shri ShashankThakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL1 (Passed on 24th day of September, 2010) 1. The matter is called for hearing. None appears nor ss any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. in view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok