1 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3821 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. A. Gole for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 8TH JUNE 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. This is not a fit case to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Firstly, the order is an interlocutory order and does not affect the rights of the parties. Secondly, the trial Judge has allowed the application for deletion of a person as a party. According to the petitioner, the person deleted is a necessary 2 party. In the application for deletion, the respondents have made it clear that they want to delete him as a party at their own risk. The respondents cannot be compelled to proceed with the application before the Claims Tribunal against all. They could choose and delete one or more of the respondents at their own risk. 3. The writ petition is rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)