AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.40 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3912 OF 2006 IN APPEAL NO.813 OF 2006 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.369 OF 2006 Nina Anil Shah ... Petitioner Vs. Kusum Bhaskarrao Gorule @ Geetanjali Ganesh Sohane. ... Respondent Mr. A.G. Shah, constituted attorney and husband of the petitioner is present in the court. Mr. M.P. Rao with Ms. Savita Sadananda i/b Dr. (Mrs.) R.R. Ajinkya for respondent 2. CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DATED : 3RD MARCH, 2010. P.C.:- 1. In this review petition, review is sought of orders dated 29/1/2007 passed by the Division Bench of this court to which one of us (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.) was a party. AJN 2 2. We have heard the petitioner, who is appearing in person and Mr. Rao, learned counsel appearing for respondent 2. 3. A preliminary objection is raised by Mr. Rao. He submitted that this review petition is not maintainable in view of the clear provision contained in Order XLVII Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure. We find substance in his submission. The petitioner had filed Review Petition (Lodging) No.34 of 2007 seeking review of order dated 29/1/2007 passed on Notice of Motion No.3912 of 2007. That review petition was disposed of as withdrawn on 21/9/2007. The petitioner is now seeking review of the said order. In view of Order XLVII Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which bars an application to review an order made on an application for a review, this review petition is not maintainable and is dismissed. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.]