@ c4; MQ‘ Es‘‘mgm Baamh 0 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.S NO. 113 /201 H WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA a . A mum WWW» m PETITIONER / Raghuwnash Ram Daharia S/o Dhanush Ram Daharia, Aged about 51 years, Middle School M g Q/\ 1 w ‘ Manikpur, Block- Bodla, Distt. Kabirdham— (C.G.) \ 2m f State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipqr. Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ' The Director Public Instruction, Chhattisgarh Government Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) The District Education officer, Distt.Kabirdham- (C.G.) Block Education officer Jashpur Distt.Raipur (C.G.) XI—HC—78 ® upwmuub h zoo mm (W) mmw wmm mmm WM WW $31Emsné¥r 8.3.: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE !*RITINKER DIWAKER 02.08.201 1 Shri Deepak Jain, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Piavesn Das, Dy. GA. for th€ State. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petiu‘oner is entitled to beneet of two advan 2e increments on account of he having passed B.Ed. examination in the year 1988 before his appointment at his own cost. it is submitted that the issue involved in the present petition is no longer res integra and the same has been finally decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena Vs. State of MEP. & Ors. 2009 (Illw/IPJR (sq 59. It is further submitted that this Court has also taken a similar View in its order dated 6.22009 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6257/2008. Counsel for the titioners further submits that the order dated 29.4.2010 passed in Writ Appeal NO. I 124/2009, wherein relying upo the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxe a (supra) and the order passed by this Court in another Writ ppeal No. 87f2009, directions have been issued for considera ‘on of the case for grant of two advance increments as per cir ar dated 13.9.1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of the facts pleaded in the petiu'on. Counsel for the State sub 'ts that case of the petitioner would also be considered on th same lines. mm In 200 mm (Wu) 311%?! m W mmm m WW wrnzvff fsz‘tm ammm a? 31E? 611%?! In. viaw of above, the petition is disposed of with. a direcu'on to the respondent ‘uthorities to decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of o advance increments as per circular dated 13.9.1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of the facts pleaded in the petiu‘on Within a period of four months from today. It is made clear that this Coult has not explessed any opinion on merits of the ca se and the authority coneemed would be at libexty to decide the same stn'ctly in accordance with law. § Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge