IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 21678 of 2007 Between: The Ramaswamudram Weavers Co-operative Production & Sales Society Limited (W.No. 489), Rep. by its President G.C. Narasimhulu, S/o. Late G. Chenchaiah, Aged 64 Years, Hindu, R/o. Ramasamudram Village, B. Kodur Mandal, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Industries and Commerce Department (Textile), Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Handlooms and Textiles, B.R.K.R. Bhavan, Liberty, Hyderabad. 3 The Assistant Director, handlooms and Textiles, Kadapa. 4 The Andhra pradesh State Cooperative Society Limited, (APCO) Rep. by its Managing Director, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad. 5 The Divisional Marketing Officer, Andhra Pradesh State Handloom Weavers Cooperative Society Limited. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue any Writ, order or direction particualrly one in the nature of MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on the part of the Respondents in providing adequate production programmes to the extent of 25000 meters of suiting cloth per moth to the members of the Petitioner Society as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the Respondents to provide production programme to the extent of 25000 meters of suiting cloth per month to the Members of the Petitioner Society and pass such toher orderor orders as this Hon'bl;e Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstancesof the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: DR.P.B.VIJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE The Court made the following : Form-NIC-OGS/WP{SPJS} O R D E R:- Dr. P.B.Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, has submitted a letter dated 4.4.2008 stating that the Divisional Marketing Officer, by his letter dated 3.3.2008, informed that the petitioner’s grievance would be considered, as such, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________ 08.04.2008 bcj