IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.W.P No.13 of 2010 Date of Decision:8.3.2010 Jhandu .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gurpartap Singh Gill, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner alongwith other alleged detenues has since been allowed to leave for their village after getting full payment of their wages from the owner of the Brick Kiln. Report to the same effect has also been filed by SDO (C) Narnaul. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition has become infructuous and is disposed of as such. 8.3.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE