IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1068 of 2006 ====================================================== Zaibun Nisha wife of Late Md. Kasim Ali, resident of village- Ghoraghat, P.S. Dobhi, District Aurangabad (Petitioner) .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Mr Birendra Bahadur Pandey, the District Magistrate, Aurangabad 2. Mr , the Director, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, V9kash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 3. Mr Celestin Hansda, the District Superintendent of Education, Aurangabad 4. The Block Education Extension Officer, Madanpur, Aurangabad (Respondents) .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== 4 21-09-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the direction of this Court contained in Annexure-1 and the letters contained in Annexure-7. From Annexure-7 it is clear that on the basis of settled law the claim of the petitioner for family pension has not been accepted because her husband died prior to 1.4.1976 in an elementary school and during that period there was no provision for payment of family pension to the teachers or non- teaching staffs of the primary schools. In the facts of the case, the contempt petition is finally disposed of. The claim has now become belated and law is settled. If the petitioner is still so advised, she may pursue her claim against the decision contained in Annexure-7 through appropriate Patna High Court MJC No.1068 of 2006 (4) dt.21-09-2011 2 proceeding in according with law. sk (Shiva Kirti Singh, J)