IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33470 of 2011 Rameshwar Yadav, son of Faudar Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3. 30.11.2011 In the order dated 17.10.2011, the last paragraph was typed as “However, he may renew his prayer for bail if he has not absconded” whereas it should have been “However, he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.” Let the last paragraph of the order dated 17.10.2011 be read as “However, he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge” in place of “However, he may renew his prayer for bail if he has not absconded.” The Last paragraph of the order dated 17.10.2011 is modified to the extent indicated above. Let this order be communicated to the Court of Sri S.K. Gupta, Judicial Magistrate, Biraul at Benipur (Darbhanga) in connection with Ghanshyampur P.S. Case No. 125 of 1995, through FAX. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)