IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH APRIL 2010 / 30TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(Crl.).No. 127 of 2010(S) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SATHYASEELAN PILLAI, AGED 49, S/O.N.S.PONNAPPAN PILLAI, R/AT BUNGLAVIL HOUSE, SOUTH MYNAGAPPILLY, KOLLAM. BY ADVS. SMT.T.S.MAYA THIYADIL, SMT.PRINCY XAVIER. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. SUB INSPECTOR, OCHIRA POLICE STATION, OCHIRA. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR, KARUNAGAPPILLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 4. VISHNU DAS, AGED 22, S/O.THULASI, R/AT THULASI BHAVANAM, VARAVILA P.O., CLAPPANA, KOLLAM DIST. 5. THULASI, AGED ABOUT 58, R/AT THULASI BHAVANAM, VARAVILA P.O., CLAPPANA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 6. VINU, AGED ABOUT 24, S/O.SURENDRAN, R/AT VINOD BHAVANAM, VARAVILA P.O., CLAPPANA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 7. DIDISH, AGED ABOUT 24, S/O.DHARMAPALAN, R/AT DAMESH BHAVANAM, VARAVILA P.O., CLAPPANA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. SANDESH RAJA, R4 TO R7 BY ADVS. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN, SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR, SRI.K.JAGADEESH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/04/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.127/2010-S: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBIT: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE CRIME NO. 270/2010 OF OCHIRA POLICE STATION. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURE: ANNEXURE A.1: COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY, PADINJATTATHIL SHREE BHADRAKALI KSHETHRAM, PUTHUPPALLY NORTH.P.O., DTD. 05/04/2010. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. S.SIRI JAGAN & P.N. RAVINDRAN, JJ. ........................................... W.P.(Crl.)NO.127 OF 2010 ............................................. Dated this the 20th day of April, 2010. J U D G M E N T Siri Jagan, J: Petitioner is the father of Greeshma Sathyan, aged 19 years. He has filed this writ petition alleging that respondents 4 to 7 are illegally detaining his daughter, Greeshma Sathyan. The said girl was present before the court on 7.4.2010. When this Court interacted with the girl, she stated that she has married the 4th respondent and she wants to go with him. The matter was again posted on 9.4.2010, on which date counsel for the petitioner was not present. Accordingly, the matter was posted to today for affidavit of the respondents. Today also counsel for the petitioner is absent. 2. In the above circumstances, we are inclined to assume that the petitioner is no more interested in pursuing this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. cl : 2 : : 3 :