IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGEMENT NO. 512 Of 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3570 Of 2003 Jaylakshmi H. Jain .. Plaintiff versus Soter Propkem Pvt.Ltd. .. Defendants ... Mr.Kedar Chambal i/b S.K. legal Associates for the plaintiff. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK,J. DATED : 29th March 2005. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff who hands in affidavit of service and original documents. Affidavit is taken on record and marked Exhibit-A. The documents are taken on record and colly. marked Exhibit-B. 2. The suit is filed for recovery of the value of the goods sold supplied and delivered to the defendant. The only documents relied upon by the plaintiff are office copies of the invoices and notice of demand. Perusal of the office copies of the invoices show that they do not bear the signature of the defendants. No other document is produced to show that there was any written agreement between the plaintiff and defendant to make the payment. The suit is therefore based on an oral agreement to pay the value of the goods. The suit therefore cannot be tried as a summary suit. Summons for Judgement is therefore dismissed. 3. Suit be tried as a regular suit. D.G. KARNIK, J