WP(C) 6048/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. GOSWAMI Heard Mr. D. K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. J. Handi que, learned State Counsel, appearing for the respondents. This writ application has been filed, primarily, seeking a direction to the resp ondent authorities to consider the applications filed by the petitioner seeking extension of the lease period of the Pabha Game Reserve Fishery Mahal No.3. Lear ned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this writ app lication, his prayer for extension of the lease period of the fishery is rejecte d by order dated 24.03.2011. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he d oes not want to press this writ petition. However, liberty may be granted to ass ail the validity of the order dated 24.03.2011, he also submits. Mr. J. Handique, learned State Counsel, does not oppose the prayer made by the l earned counsel for the petitoner. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Since a separate cause of action has arisen, the writ petitioner will be at libe rty to avail the remedy as may be available to him in law.