Crl. Misc. No. M-30551 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-30551 of 2011 Date of Decision : November 09, 2011 Surjit Singh .... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Gurmohan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Learned State counsel, on instructions from HC Sukhwant Singh, states that the complainant has stated that she has effected compromise with the accused. Counsel for the petitioner refers to written compromise (Annexure P-3 in connected bail petition bearing Crl. Misc. No. M-32249 of 2011), according to which, amount of the complainant has been returned to her and nothing remains due to her from the accused. In view of the aforesaid, without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case, the instant petition for anticipatory bail is Crl. Misc. No. M-30551 of 2011 2 allowed. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the conditions specified in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He shall join investigation as and when required by the police. Presently, the petitioner is directed to join investigation on 21.11.2011 at 10:00 A.M. and continue to do so as and when required by the police. November 09, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE