IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M 8170 of 2009 Date of decision: 21.05.2009 Pappu ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARBANS LAL Present: Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Amit Kaushik, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana *** Harbans Lal, J.( Oral) This petition has been moved by Pappu under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.279 dated 27.11.2008 under Section 15 and 27-A/61/85 of NDPS Act, registered at Police Station, Uchana District, Jind. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties, besides perusing the record with due care and circumspection. The petitioner has not been named in the FIR. On instructions from Mahavir Singh, Assistant Sub Inspector, the learned State counsel informs that the car has been recovered from the petitioner. This petition is allowed subject to the following conditions: (1)The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required. (2)The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and (3)The petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. May 21, 2009 ( Harbans Lal ) amrit Judge