IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1797 OF 2005 Rammu Mohamad Shaikh ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.R.D.Suryawanshi for Applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 17, 2005. MARCH 17, 2005. MARCH 17, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Ordinarily, having regard to the fact that the Applicant is a history-sheeter, as already five criminal cases are registered against the Applicant, there can be no reason to modify the condition imposed by the lower Court, requiring the Applicant to furnish P.R.bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with one local solvent surety in the like amount. : 2 : 2. However, as the Applicant has approached this Court, after lapse of around three months, asserting that he is not in a position to arrange for requisite surety, the amount is reduced, on request of the Applicant to Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with one or two solvent sureties instead of local surety. 3. Application disposed of on the above terms. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.