PIL 70/2006 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Amitava Roy, J Heard Mr. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. RK Adh ikari, learned State Counsel, Assam. The present proceeding in the form of a public interest litigati on, had been registered at the instance of the petitioner, claiming itself to be a social service institution espousing the cause of the uprooted non-Boro popul ation following the ethnic violence in the district of Kokrajhar and Bongaigaon during 1992-1998. They complained of total apathy and indifference on the part of the State and the Central Government towards essential steps to be taken in t he matter. In course of the proceedings, the Governments have filed their a ffidavits detailing the steps taken by them in phases to provide, amongst others , rehabilitation grants for construction of houses of the uprooted families. Th e averments made in their pleadings reveal that various amounts have been releas ed in succession by the Central Government and disbursed by the concerned author ities of the State Government to the persons concerned to secure their rehabilit ation. As the details thereof, are recorded in the affidavits alluded hereinabo ve, this Court considers it unnecessary to dilate on the same in this order. Th is is more so, as the learned counsel for the petitioner submits on instructions that steps and measures as promised by the two Governments have, in fact, been taken and that the issue of rehabilitation of the uprooted families involved, ha ve been attended with due care and diligence. In view of the above, we do not propose to pass any further orde r in this proceeding. It is, accordingly, closed.