IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 25TH JANUARY 2011 / 5TH MAGHA 1932 LA.App..No. 376 of 2010(D) -------------------------- LAR.63/2006 of ADDL.SUB COURT,KOLLAM .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT IN LAR ------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.R.BINDU RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT IN LAR ------------------------------ SHYLA, JAS VILLA, MEENATHU CHERRY, SAKTHIKULANGARA. ADV. SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN FOR R SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR FOR R SMT.GEETHA P.MENON FOR R SRI.N.AJITH FOR R SRI.P.M.NEELAKANDAN FOR R THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/01/2011, ALONG WITH LAA NO. 957 OF 2010 & CONNECTED CASES THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.Nos.376, 957, & 406 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 25h day of January, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. We have today by our judgment in L.A.A. No.409/2010 approved Ext.A2 judgment which was relied on by the Reference Court in all these cases. Having gone through the impugned judgment, we are convinced that the Court below was justified in placing reliance on Ext.A2. The acquisition under Ext.A2 as well as the acquisition in all these cases was same. The properties were also situated near to each other. According to us, reliance placed by the learned Subordinate Judge on Ext.A2 was perfectly justified. Ext.A2, having been confirmed , there is no warrant for interference with the impugned common judgment. All the appeals will stand dismissed, however without any order as to costs. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE dpk