1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)No.8114 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 V.Jeyalakshmi .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Trichy, Trichy District. 2. The Tahsildar, Tiruvarumbour Taluk, Trichy, Trichy District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Thiruvarumbour Police Station, Thiruvarumbour, Trichy District. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from initiating coercive steps for dispossessing petitioner from the land comprised in Survey No.270/44 measuring about 0.27.5 Hectares bearing Patta No.1255 situated at No.65, Valavandhan Kottai Village, Trichy District not otherwise than due process of law. For Petitioner : Mr.N.R.Balaji Srinivasan For Respondents : Mr.M.Govindan, Special Government Pleader. O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner for a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from initiating coercive steps for dispossessing petitioner from the land comprised in Survey No.270/44 measuring about 0.27.5 Hectares bearing Patta No.1255 situated at No.65, Valavandhan Kottai Village, Trichy District not otherwise than due process of law. 2. Heard Mr.N.R.Balaji Srinivasan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The admitted case of the petitioner is that a civil suit is pending between the petitioner and Lilly Flora Mary in O.S.No.831 of 2007, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruchirapalli. There is no interim order. The representation has been made by the petitioner on 18.05.2011 to 11 persons viz., to the Chief Minister and various Government Officials and other Ministers. One of the grievance raised in the said representation is that the respondents 1 to 3 are interfering with the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 petitioner and the representation primarily is a complaint against one officer for taking action under the provisions of SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989. 5. Based on this representation, the petitioner now seeks a direction to forbear the respondents from initiating coercive steps to dispossess petitioner from the land as mentioned in the writ petition. What the petitioner could not achieve in the civil suit, cannot be granted in a writ petition invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India. The relief sought for is declined. 6. Insofar as the grievance stated in the representation is concerned, the petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedy as per law before the competent authority. 7. By giving above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(C.S) To 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Trichy, Trichy District. 2. The Tahsildar, Tiruvarumbour Taluk, Trichy, Trichy District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Thiruvarumbour Police Station, Thiruvarumbour, Trichy District. +1. CC to M/s Hall Mark Associates, Advocate, SR.No. 24338 +1. CC to the Special Government Pleader, SR.No. 24502 ssl W.P(MD)No.8114 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 21.07.2011 TR : 02.08.2011: 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/