IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN THURSDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2010 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 10 of 2010() --------------------------- OP.47/2009 of FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD .................... PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT/PETITIONER ----------------------------------- SABUDEEN, S/O.ABDUL SAMAD,RESIDING AT SAHEENA MANZIL,KUNNUMUKAL,VELLUMANNADY P.O., PULLAMPARA VILLAGE, NEDUMANGADU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DT.REP.BY HIS P/A HOLDER ABDUL SAMAD,S/O.IBRAHIM KUNJU,R/AT SHAHEENA MANZIL PULAMBARA VILLAGE,VENNUMANNADI. BY ADV. SRI.SIBY MATHEW SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU SRI.B.PREMNATH (E) RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. SHANIFA BEEVI, D/O.ABDUL KHARIM, RESIDING AT VAHASERI CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, KOCHALUMMOODU, KANCHINADA P.O.,PANGODU VILLAGE, NEDUMANGADU TALUK,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DT. 2. ABDUL KHARIM, S/O.MUHAMMED HANEEFA, RESIDING AT VAHASERI CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, KOCHALUMMOODU, KANCHINAD P.O.,PANGODU VILLAGE, NEDUMANGADU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DT. 3. HALEEMA BEEVI, W/O.ABDUL KHARIM, RESIDING AT VAHASERI CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, KOCHALUMMOODU, KANCHINADA P.O., PANGODU VILLAGE, NEDUMANGADU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DT. 4. SHANAVAS, S/O ABDULKHARIM, RESIDING AT VAHASERI CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, KOCHALUMMOODU, KANCHINADA P.O., PANGODU VILLAGE, NEDUMANGADU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DT. MA.10/10 2 5. YUSAF, S/O.MUHAMMED HANEEFA, RESIDING AT THADATHARIKATHU VEEDU, KOCHALUMMOODU, KANCHINADA P.O.,PANGODU VILLAGE, NEDUMANGADU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DT. 6. SHAFI, S/O.YUSAF, RESIDING AT THADATHARIKATHU VEEDU, KOCHALUMMOODU, KANCHINADA P.O.,PANGODU VILLAGE, NEDUMANGADU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DT. 7. ABDUL RASHEED,S/O.MUHAMMED HANEEFA,R/AT THADATHARIKATHU VEEDU,KOCHALUMMOODU,KANCHINADA PO, PANGODU VILLAGE,NEDUMANGADU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DT.(THE SECRETARY,KOCHALUMOODU MUSLIM JAMA-ATH,KOCHALUMMODU,PANGODE VILLAGE). BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.K.SATHEESH KUMAR THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- Mat.A.No.10 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. The appellant filed an original petition before the family court. That has been dismissed for default, recording that the appellant had been absent consecutively and the petition cannot be proceeded with in his absence. It is also recorded that he has not been turning up in spite of specific directions. Whatever be the reasons, the appellant has statutory remedies before the family court itself to seek restoration of the proceeding which is dismissed for default. We do not, therefore, find any ground to entertain this appeal. The appeal fails. The same is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- P.S.GOPINATHAN, Judge. kkb.4/03.