BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBltASPUR WRITAPPEALNO. s^ 7 2008 (Arising out of an order dated 15. lO.ZOOT^passed by the Learrted Single Judge, H^ny^ Shri S.K.Agnihplri-.l, in Review Petition No.65/2007/tHerebydismi^sihgthe said review petition) APPELLANT .^&^€^ J^t;:::.---"' ^" <->-: -s^-', \ '^•'•' AIA '' tii?" RESPONDENT Muktipad Ghoshal S/o Late Shri B.N. Ghoshal, Aged-63 years, Ret. Assistant Engiheer Water Resources Department, R/6 J-8, Parijat Colony, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur (C.G.); •,, . ! ; . ,. • ,.: • ;- VERSUS 5 : '-f) State of ChHattisgarh Tliroughthe Principal Seeretary Water Resoyrces EieRartment, D.K.S. Bhawan,^ fRaipur;(C.G.) .^r~'^) Engifieer-in-Chief . Maler ResourGesj&epartment,! Governmeilt of ChhattisgaFn, .^^..C^>^" ;,/ ;; •RaipurW.G.) • - ',: ^: . ^ ;]1'1:;: 1: - : !''%5's!%o>';,';' ify j), 3) GhiefEngineer, S/fsSS'\ <-o^'v "., . y \?"' i\^Wi"&\. ~v^ ss>; V Minimata Hasdeo Bango PrCiject; Bilaspur (C,G.) y:--..WRIT.APPEAL.U;N DiRtSiEG;iI1J©EN^J;K:tili;OfEittMiKj I i:j ^KRAlrTisliARW^GiBMaiBEifiaEffiiBjSfflinffl31iffliai§a BENCH'l^iKMi06yKEMNfflMBUanBBgiaSKaM THE:HIGMl'CC»UlkaT!^IISigai;l-IWi@E§l3itlililEimiESS s»<» DB! MiaHCOOTCTOp f^mLTrsMsssas.aujuspmt. ABBeUant: Rnwtondent aon*Bi^t. N. wwffwa HOlfBUB PRiMBRftnTKBBMatMBBniRk. JJ Wrtt ABBeri ao. 35 of 2008 Mufc^ad Ghoabri Vs. State ofCbhattisgarh. and ofhers WRIT WKBAL W8 3tU OP T^ <»HAItBBQAIW HIflH RUIA ISTdTO (Bl <»?THE HIGW CtWlRT OP CaaiA'mSCUUBil R3BLB8.2006 ApBearance: Mr. Anaad DadatiaandMr.P.R. Patankar, counscl fbr fhe appeBaat Mr.Amnd Dubey, Paael Lani^cr, for fhe State/se^)ondetite. jTOcaiMn- (07.04.20^ PwI-M,. 1. This writ appeat Iias beeai-filediagamst fhe iiapByied oider passcd by tfae leamed SB^IC Judge in Renew Petitioa No.65/2007 dated 15th of October, 2007 dtaaissing flie Rewiew Petition of fhe writ appeUaat 8. The brief facte of the case are that agaiast fhe cada? of disnussal dated 12.07.2007 passcd ia Writ ftetitfon <S) N0,4041/2007 by the leapned Siiq[le Judge, a -wrtt appeal was fited bemg W.A.No.237/3007 whidi w^ daspoaed of with au obscT»ation tihat sidce fh.e writ petttioa wa» not dccided on aaerits but onty on the grouad of ladhes, it wffl be opeuiM- the appdlaat to.tapve fiM-icnew^ofliieotlcTitrf -.1 \ 4. 5. Writ Aapeal No.35/2008 HoaTile Single JudgeJa l^ttoftbe cfaaa^d *nn»iin>atnnra<a ofpcnsioiiaiy buacfits. The writ appeUwxt was appomted as OwTseee/Sidi- E^igmeer in the Water Resourees Depa'tmeat oa. 09.08.1966. Thereafter, byoidCTdated05.tO.1988, hetra® proaaoted to the post of Assteaat Engiaeea anA 'be eontinued to work as such tiU the date o£ lua superannuatk>n.l.e., 31.05.2005. Vide oxder dated 17«11/19& ManA, 1989, the State Govenunent faad pscwided fhe scheme of'EcsnaoaaMltt graatiag two time-bound pay-se^es equlvatent to next higher pay seales dunng the eatire semce care®-,oae ia case aa empl<yee has comiriteted 12 yeaas of scnrice ia (te aaid postbut less fhan 24 y^us aod fhe eecoad one is after. coiaptetton of24 jrears ofseivK'e. The petttioner appioaehed the aatltcattfes cwicesaeS. fav granta^ fhat beaefitbut coiddaotavaU. Inllte retBrafiled by thc respandents, it has been meattoiied &at sonae enquiiy was penda^ agaiast tte writ s^p^Mtt iaeludtag oae B.P. Singhaadotfaets^^^^id th^werechatgB-rfwetedin the year 1996. The dwsflmssy proceediags were contfaiucd resultiag ia pumftonent of sto^page of oaae inc»emen,t with cnmnlatwe effeet wde oader dated 13^)5.2002. The Scheme of &a«nonaati was aaade applicabfe wifhefifeet fiimi 19.4.1999 but dae to aad; SjsctpVaaaay ptoeeedin^, he could mrt he ffvcs •Qse aaime. Howcver, after coachistoa <rf tbe SsaeJfiSfVBSf fsoeae&toy^ •{cy.-xesy Writ AweslVfo35/39B8 ^ as per fhe &vtmanmtt Rufes, -tfte scTriee recoiad crf test S years •which Adl be tateen ato GonsUteiatk>n idute ^wiag beaefit of <tie Kiamoiuiati, -WEea referal to fhc Stete Govemment in fbe year 2003 vide tetter dated 10.07.2003. A copf ofthe said lettcr has beea swmaBedsta A^BCXUBB R-2 to the retuni. It ra neeessaiy to pradueg. ttw sdevuist put ofparapaifli 3 offheTeturaoffheState/respoadeBt ia ttto regaid wliich ia as iinder. "It is xcspeetlul^ sabaAted thafcas airi when fhe decfaioawoiddtee tahenthatwould bc co.minunicated to fhe petitianer aid thereafifcer the pensiua ete., wodd bcae-fixca acccwdaagly.* 6. In view of (he above meirtKaiBd atateiawat made i& fhe retuia and flle &ct itoat fla ;matter m questfam tos beea Tefaared to ttte State Goveaaaaent for taldng a decis^a as also fhe &ct tliat one siaaBarfy sitaated en^lcyec maBKty Bfaaadxa Pal Siiigh, Assistant Snh-lSMpiuwr^ baa been ^Baated the beaeflt of Knsmwnnati -trifli dEtet feaBa 13.05.1999, who was also puaished wiffi flie troit appcBaat and whose <n incaeincat w-yh cumalativc eBfeet was dso wlfhhdd; fhe petitioiier's case shouldatoo IxccaaMdMBd as expcditiously as possibte. 7. TheTefiMC, we set ^Aie fhe aapu^cd cudei-saad dia|»seo£ this writ appealwife a direetioato theState GwnMmaeatto consader fhc case of the pctitiDnerfor J&u»M»warfaadtake a decisioa as esaSy as posaibte pwfiscabty withia a paaod «xf "Illi r & •iste, s & ts- ~ "~'is"% ^. ^ ^; 1 WrftAnpeaI No.3^2008 ^*^".'' Rao two aioirilis tom fhie date of grotoctioaof a co^r offhis OBderbefoae fhe Siecictuy Water Reaources DqiartaaBait. 8. Wifli the aforesaid diicction, ttiis Eq^ed staads dlaposed of. Nocosts. Sd/. I.M.Quddusi Judg® ^ Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge !>'