IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4452 of 2004 Between: 1 K. Raji Reddy S/o Malla Reddy Staff Assistant, District Cooperative Central Bank, Saidapur Branch, Karimnagar 2 T. Manohar S/o T. Venkanna Staff Assistant, District Cooperative Central Bank, HO., Karimnagar 3 P. Rajender, S/o P. Anjaiah Staff Assistant, District Cooperative Central Bank Limited Karimnagar 4 A. Raji Reddy S/o Sri A. Malla Reddy Staff Assistant, District Cooperative Central Bank, Huzurabad, Karimnagar District 5 V. Kamalakar Rao S/o Sri V. Dhamarao Staff Assistant. Town Branch, Karimnagar 6 A.V. Surya Prakash Rao S/o Sri A. Ram Gopala Rao Staff Assistant, District Cooperative Central Bank, Chappadandi, Karimnagar ... PETITIONER (S) AND 1 The District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, karimnagar, rep by General Manager, Karimnagar 2 The Committee Person Incharge, Karimnagar District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd., Karimnagar ...RESPONDENT (S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to impugned proceedings No. B5/3026/02-03 DT 17-1-2003 and B5/3026/02-03 DT 22-1-2003 and Consequential Memo No. B5/ 2003-04 dt 24-12-2003 and Memo No. B5/2577/2003-04 dt 25-1-2004 and quash the same by holding them as illegal, bad, and arbitrary by declaring the action of the respondents as violative of Principles of natural justice and contrary to the well settled principle of law Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.J.R.MANOHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent: MR.P.M.GOPAL RAO FOR RVAK-1&2 The Court Made the Following Order: W.P.NO.4452 OF 2004 ORDER: In view of the decision of a Full Bench of this court in KONASEEMA CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED V. N.SEETHARAMARAJU[1] and the decision of the Supreme Court in FEDERAL BANK LIMITED V. SAGAR THOMAS AND OTHERS[2], this Writ Petition seeking resolution of a dispute relating to the services of the petitioners with the respondent- Corporation bank is not maintainable. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. The petitioner is, however at liberty to pursue his appropriate remedies before the jurisdictional Civil Court. No costs. ___________________ (GODA RAGHURAM, J) June 24, 2004 NOTE: Issue copy by two days (B/O) Mrr Copy to: 1 General Manager, The District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Karimnagar. 2 The Committee Person In charge, Karimnagar District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd., Karimnagar. 3. Two C.D. Copies. [1] AIR 1990 AP 171 (FB) [2] 2003 (7) SUPREME 22