IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 22ND MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 4469 of 2009(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- TIRURANGADI TALUK CO-OP EDUCATION SOCIETY LTD., NO. M. 515,PARAPPANANGADI, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, C.ABDU RAHIMANKUTTY, P.O. PARAPPANANGADI, PIN 676 303. BY ADV. SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. PARAPPANANGADI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,PARAPPANANGADI 2. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT GREEEN CHANNEL CLEARANCE COMMITTEE, REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN AND DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, MALAPPURAM. 3. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT ENVORINMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, MALAPPURAM. 4. MALIYEKKAL RUKHIYA, W/O. LATE V.P. ALI HAJI, PARAKKAV, MOONNIYUR SOUTH P.O., PIN 676 311, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.A.SUDHI VASUDEVAN FOR R3 SHRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.4469 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 11th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges a licence issued by the 1st respondent Panchayat to the 4th respondent. I am of opinion that the proper course open to the petitioner is to challenge the licence in an appeal as provided under the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act. Therefore, without prejudice to that right, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge