IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI SATURDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2009 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 13118 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- HARI K.R., AGED 23 YEARS, S/O K.S.RAMACHANDRAN, KARIATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHERUVATHERY, CHEVOOR P.O., TRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHOSH (PODUVAL) SMT.R.RAJITHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O. ADV.SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J --------------------------- W.P.(C).13118 of 2009 --------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner was a student of Government Law College, Thrissur, who completed his LLB course. The College is affiliated to the Calicut University. He had passed all papers except in Paper III Labour Law-I of 9th Semester Examination. Apparently, dissatisfied with the marks obtained by him, he had applied for revaluation. He is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioner in relation to the LLB Examination in Paper III Labour Law-I, as early as W.P.(C).13118 of 2009 :: 2 :: possible, at any rate, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. Sd/- (V.GIRI) Judge sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge