1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.56 of 2009 RAJESH MAHASETH @ RAJESH KUMAR MAHASETH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 22.1.2009 Anilkrsinha Heard learned counsel for the parties. This revision application has been preferred against conviction and sentence dated 8.9.1999, passed by the S.D.J.M., the Judgment and order of conviction dated 18/19.9.2008, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No.V, Katihar, in Cr. Appeal No.54 of 1999 confirming the Judgment of Katihar, in C.A. No.20/95/Tr No.478 of 1999. Both the courts have convicted the petitioner on the charge under sections 147 and 323 of the I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo R.I. for one year under both the counts. This application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 16.12.2008, passed by this Court in Cr.Rev. No.1457 of 2008 in which the sentence awarded to the petitioners( Ranjan Kumar Mahaseth, Saanjay Kumar Mahaseth and Ashok Kumar Mahaseth), has been set aside with following observations:- “In the result, while confirming the order of conviction against the petitioners, the sentence awarded to them is hereby set aside. The petitioners are directed to be released under Section 4 of Probation of Offenders Act on furnishing bond of Rs.1000/- (One thousand) each to the like amount to the satisfaction of the court below for a period of one year for maintaining peace and to be of good behavior. They are directed to furnish bond within fifteen days of receipt of this order failing which the sentence awarded to them shall stand.” Let this order passed in Cr. Appeal No. 54 of 1999 be faxed to the court of Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No. V, Katihar through Fax at the cost of the petitioners. (S.P.Singh,J).