IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 13855 of 2008 Between: 1 B.Sankara Rao, S/o. late Suryanarayana, R/o. H.No.10-28, Sai Nagar Colony, Kushaiguda, Hyderabad-500 062. 2 S.Vijaya Kumar, S/o. late Venugopal, R/o. H.No.9-38, Main road, Ghatkesar, R.R.District-501 301, A.P., 3 Khaja Sirajuddin, S/o. Khaja Mohinuddin R/o. H.No.8-171, Main Road, Brooke Bond Colony, Ghatkesar (Mandal & Village), R.R.District-501 301 4 M.Bhagavanth Reddy, S/o. M.Yadhi Reddy, R/o. H.No.7-214/1, Main Road, Shiva Reddyguda, Ghatkesar, R.R.District-501 301, Andhra Pradesh. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (Hyderabad Campus) National Centre of the Government of India for Nuclear Science and mathematics PBNo.5 ECIL PO, HYderabad- 500 062, rep by its Scientist In-charge. 2 The Administrative Officer-D, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (Hyderabad Campus) National Centre of the Government of India for Nuclear Science and Mathematics PBNo.5 ECIL PO, HYderabad-500 062, 3 Mr. A.Chandramouli, S/o. Appala Naidu, R/o. C/o. Mr. A.Anantha Chary, H.No.1-10-28/224, Nagarjuna Nagar colony, Kushaiguda, Hyderabad-500 062 4 Mr. N.Vinayaka Rao, S/o. late Narsinga Rao, R/o. Opp.Hanuman Temple, Near Malkajgiri Police Station, H.No.9-38, Malkajgiri, Hyderabad. 5 Mr.K.Mahidar Reddy, S/o. late Narayana Reddy, R/o. Dammiguda, Keesara Mandal, H.No.8-171. Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents nos.1 and 2 in not accepting the applications of the Petitioners as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14,16,19 and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to absorb the Petitioners herein into service in accordance with the Notice No.1/2008 Ref:TFR/BF/183-743 dated 16.01.2008 issued by the respondent No.2 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.G.NARENDER RAJ Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASEKHAR REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition, in view of subsequent developments. He further requests that liberty may be given to the petitioners to pursue their remedies, as and when the cause of action arises. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, leaving it open to the petitioners to pursue their remedies, as and when any grievance is felt by them. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ Dt.07.08.2008 L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J GJ