IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5266 of 2010 DEEPAK DAS SON OF KISHUN DAS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PARSANDO, POLICE STATION KHARAGPUR, DISTRICT MUNGER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 4.3.2010. Heard Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in Kharagpur P.S. Case No.93 of 2008 for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 436, 427 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 & 4 of Explosive Substance Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while pressing bail petition of the petitioner, has submitted that the petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. and no material has been collected against him save and except his name has surfaced in this case on the basis of confessional statement of one of the accused. He, by referring Annexure-2 to the petition, submits that another co- accused, almost in similar circumstances, has been granted bail by this Court on 20.10.2008 vide Cr. Misc.No.39899 of 2008. Let the petitioner above named be - 2 - N.H./ enlarged on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Munger in Kharagpur P.S. CaseNo.93 of 2008 with condition that on each and every date, the petitioner shall remain present in court, failing which his bail bond shall stand automatically cancelled provided that in special exigency, the petitioner can make a prayer before the court for prior permission for his none appearance on a particular date and the court below may examine such prayer on its own merit. With above condition and direction, the bail petition is allowed. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)