IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN MONDAY, THE 11TH DECEMBER 2006 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 RP.No. 15 of 2004(P) -------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.35847/2003 Dated 13/11/2003 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER ---------------------- T.S.NINAN, THARAYL NOBLE VILLA, PALLIPPADU VADAKEKARA KIZHAKKE MURI, PALLIPADU. BY ADV. SRI.PIOUS JACOB RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALLEPPEY. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHENGANNUR. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KARTHIKAPPALLY. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PALLIPAD. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN, J. -------------------------------- R.P.NO.15 OF 2004 IN W.P.(C).No.35847 of 2003 --------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of December, 2006 O R D E R This is an application seeking review of the order in W.P.(C).No.35847/2003. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition was subsequently dismissed for default. As such there is no interim order. The interim order would have also been dismissed along with the writ petition. Hence, there is nothing to review. Review Petition is dismissed. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE. kcv.