CD C^ |^^_ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR licG^ ^^ W.P.S No /2010 PETITIONERS: /\ ^- ^ ^ ^ y^o^' ^w ^w ^^- ^6/f ^"^y •'^y ^' ^^ 1. Narsimha, Aged about 46 years, S/o Shri Narsaya, R/o Sector 10, street no 31, House No. 6A/1, Bhilai (C.G.) '35 'J^a3^ 2. K. Chinni, Age- not known, W/o Shri Isharu, R/o Secfor 6, Street 57, Quarter No. 6C, Bhilai (C.G.) '^ ^ ^Gjns 3. K. Suhasni, Age- Not known, W/o K. hri Gangaiya, R/o Sector 6, Street no. 55, Quarter No. 2A, BhUai (C.G.) q"^ ^^a^s 4. Ashirwadam, Age- Not kno\vn/ W/o Shri Dayaya, R/o Sector 9, Bhilai (C.G.) S3>5 •-(^cm3 5. Uma Bai, Age- Not kno^vn, W/o Shri Jasan Deep, R/o Utkal Colony, Ganj para, Durg (C.G.) ^^ 4^cu'li 6. Dahsodaya, Age- Not laiown, W/o Shri Kanaihya, R/o Utkal Colony/ Ganj para, Durg (C.G.) •3-z-\eo^3 7. Rajeebo, Age - NG-fc4^own, S/o Shri Raghunath, R/o Utkal Colony, Ganj para, Durg (C.G.) ^,6 ^&6SU ^~ 8. Jagat, Age- Not knQia-i, S/o Shri Mahiswal, R/o Utkal Colony, Ganj para, Durg (C.G.) j^- ui <-(e^Jrl<> 9. Durgabai, Age- Not knowftrW/o Shri Sudarshan, R/o Siddhart Nagar, Kali Mandir, Durg (C.G.) '^^ ^-(PCt^LS 10. Kailash, Age about- Not known, S/o Shri Nullu, R/o Siddhart Nagar, Kali Mandir, Durg (C.G.) ^^ ^CA-n3> 11. Sheetal, Age -Not known, S/o Shri Prakash, R/o Siddhart Nagar, Kali Mandir, Durg (C.G.) L\ l ^(^a?u 12. Indro, Age- Not Imo^vn, S/o Sadhu, R/o Indra colony, Potia Road, durg (C.G.) '^ ^- ^ e ar^ 13. Puran, Age- N'erimewy^S/o Shri Gangaram, R/o Siddhart Nagar, Kali Mandir, Durg (C.G.) N^^n^y '^ 6- 4 e^-? ^~ 14. Bfffe^, Age- Not knowi^ S/o Shri Birbal, R/o Siddhart Nagar, Kali Mandir, Durg (C.G.) *V^"<^CLS^ 15. Dilip, Age- Ne^aiewn, S/o Shri Padam, R/o Raipur Naka, Durg (C.G.) ^- —$^^ean-s 16. Dulari bai, Age Not kno^vn, W/o Shri Ashok, R/o Dhewara, borsi, Durg (C.G.) -^'Z ^\e^^S 17. Prakash, Age Net4(ft©w.n,S/o Shri Heeralal, R/o Indira Colony, Durg (C.G.) '^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Principal Secretary ^gc^ Department of Urban Administration and Development Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Under Secretary Department of Urban Adm.inistration and Development Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Commissioner Municipal Corporation Durg District- Durg (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS ^ COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT PETST10N (S) N0. 7483 OF 2010 Petitioners Respondents Versus Narsimha & Others State of Chhattisgarh & Others WR!T PETiTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTiTUTlON QF INDiA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnahotri, J.) Present:- Shri Saurabh Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panei Lawyer for the State. Shri B.L. Sahu, Advocate forthe respondent No.3. ORDER (ORALI (Passed on 30th day of March, 2011) At the very outset, jearned counsei appearing for the parties jointiy and fairiy submlt that the issue involved in the present petition as we!! as in Virendra Das Manlkpuri & Others v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others1 which was considered and decided by this Court on 10.02.2011, are jdentical. Thus, the instant petition js squareiy covered by the order passed by this court in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others . in view ofthe submission made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, this petltion is disposed of in terms of the order passed 'in Virendra Das Manikpuri& Others . — Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge gown 1 W.P.(S) No. 7450 of 2010, dedded on 10.02.2011