.? 9J/ ^/ 'y \. .' \, • \\ ^s)lllf/ IS 'EBB NADHI& ZSASSSH ABaI^ISEE&IiyE IBIiiWAlj JABAffOB B%eH • :.. ^ • . „; 'BEWE» ' COA )^2-C:^T3^') Satpal Selagal S/o Dina ffath SehgalST^ears" Asstt Minin& OfJCB.eer Baipur, , ... ..^ S-£ia.G&SS. •TOBSUS .,.•. ! • 1. tbe State of tedhya 1'radesa,' thBsugh the Seoretery Mlneral £esouroes Sepl-t, Baltobb Bbawan Bhopal 'ti-.f. - / 2. Ihe Direetor, Seology.and Hlnteg go-rt ofy..P., Baipur (M.I.), ...., 'SESSQlSBSS'SS ^s&iia o's AmicA'nows 1. ?artiealars of the appUe^it. (i) Hame o£ tbe applicent (il) K'aae of Sather. (iii) Age of the applioant (lv) Designation and partieafera! ot offiee. Office addregs. As attove x (vi) Address for servleeof notioe X rar-tieu.lars of ths Sespondent. (i) Wame of the re^pondent : (ii) Haae of fa-fcher 3 (iii) Age of the respoaden't (iv) Designa'tioB and ^ rticalars o£ office. f: Ag above 1 i (vi) Address for servioe ofnotiee. 1 I 5. 2'artieulars of the order agaisfc wfat da application is nade. . , Zfae applioation is against the followingorder.: (i) Orderwo. 21 51/B-1140/95/Mi/d) (2) Date : 27-4-95 (5) •E'assed by s Ifae uovt of M'i>' Mlneral Besottroes Septt Bhopal. Subjeot in brief:- Ihe bon'bl®Iribunal by order dat'ed 21-4-92 (A/4) dated 21-4-95 diredted the fiespon- dents to consider ttie applioant for proaol-lon On tias p6st,of Mining Offioer. Itis alleged that be was I f , QQnsidered by'tiae BE-0 held on 28/6/95 but was illegaXls || ao-t found fit for pronotion by order dtd. 27.4.95and henae -tbisi applieatiios. ' ..2/~ ^^i^^ii^ ;"? '•A y 1 HLGH COUHLOF CHHATTISGARH :__BILASpUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1118 of 2005 Petitioner Satpal Sehgal Versus Respondents The State of Madhya Pradesh Chhattisgarh) & others (SB: HonTile Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) None for the petitioner. Shri N. N. Roy, Panel Lawryer for the respondents/State. luow 1. 2. ( Passed on this 27th day of October, 2009 ) The matter is caUed for hearing twice. On both the occasious none appears nor aiiy representation is saade on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner m.ay not be interested in prosecuting the raatter. In view of the foregoir^, ffae petition is dismissed for waut of prosecution. A copy of this order shall be sent to fhe petitioner forthwifh. i\ ——— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit/ Thatur T-E^ Slal'''''"'^'"""'a!'- ~Narea®».^