<f ^-{-7-71 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Writ Petition (S) No. li^ /2007 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER •..•••\^~Jat" t^''... ^^ <<c> ,^^^ ^^f •y' RESPONDENTS / Smt. Ahelya Bai Tondon, aged about 22 years, wife of Shri Arun Kumar Tondon, resident of village Taaksiwa, Post - Lawatara, Tah. Beria, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS --1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Che Secretary, Department of Woman and Child Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^2. The Collector, Distt. Durg, Office at Durg (C.G.) ^-3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Beria, Distt. Durg (C.G.) / 4. The Prqfect Officer - Berla, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ^5. Smt. Reena Patel, wife of Shri Nandkumar Patel, aged about 22 years, resident of vfllage Takeshwar, Tah. Berla, Distt. Durg (C.G.) r~ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR 8.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. n •s.tCTo. Petitioner Smt. Ahelva Bai Tondon. versus State ofChhattisgarh & Present : Shri N.S.Dhmandhar;(Advocate for the petitioner Shri Vinay Pandey, Paael Lawyer for the respom no. 1 (Passed on 2nd ofMarch, 2007) ¥- Learaed counsel respondent no. 5 petitioner is better belongs to Schedul not living below category. for the petitioner submits that the as been appointed in ber place, though the qualified, lives below the poverty line and ;d Caste community. The respondent no. 5 is povertyii.ne and she belongs to general 2. According to the leamed couasel for t'he petitioner, the petitioner has preferentia.1 right over the respondent. no. 5. 3. Be that as it may, the Collector, Durg is directed to look into the allegations made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders ia accordance with law as per Anganbadi Scheme. -7.- 4. This matter is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. 5. Consequently, M(W)P no. 816/2007 stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge Acui