IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15085 of 2009 JAGAN YADAV @ JAGGU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 20.07.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under section 302 and other allied sections of the penal code, 27 of the Arms Act and section 17 of the Cr.L. Amendment Act. The informant alleged that while he was returning from the house of one Narain Yadav his police jeep was intercepted by 25-30 miscreants on the bank of Mahane river and on account of firing open by the miscreants, the jeep got ablazed and one of the police personnel got injury who subsequently died. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his description regarding name, parentage and residence varies from the accused mentioned in the FIR. It is submitted on behalf of the State that though there appears to be minor variation in the nomenclature of the petitioner, charge sheet has been submitted against him. Prayer for bail of the petitioner is refused with liberty to renew the prayer for bail after nine months. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J).