IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Second Bail Application No. 4829/2010 Anil Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan 20.5.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Praveen Jain - for petitioner Mr Piyush Kumar - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is behind bars for last 17 months and trial is likely to take time. Hence, petitioner may be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, learned PP has opposed the bail application. He submits that quantity of contraband recovered is commercial quantity and in view of section 37 of the NDPS Act, petitioner may not be given benefit of bail. After considering rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties, without making any comments on merits of the case which may otherwise affect outcome of trial, in the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, bail application is dismissed. However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma