MFA 32/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.UPADHYAY Heard Mrs. U. Chakraborty, learned standing counsel, NF Railway for the appellan t-Union of India and Mr. A. Goyal, learned counsel representing the respondent. This appeal was filed by the appellant-Union of India against the judgment and o rder dated 09.11.2010 passed by the learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Guwahati Be nch, in Claim Application No. OA 21/2009, whereby on the basis of the issue Nos. 2 and 3 the freight was assessed for the distance of 2954 & 2582 km. The learn ed Tribunal upon consideration of the entire gamut of facts directed the respond ent to refund Rs.8,30,778/- to the appellants along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the Claim Application till realization and also prop ortionate cost of Rs.6,600/- and legal professional fees Rs.3,000/-. Learned standing counsel, NF Railway in her usual fairness submits that in terms of instructions received by her, the freight was correctly assessed by the lear ned Tribunal in the impugned order as per the distances, for the first consignme nt between Mb PTG and JTTN and for the second consignment between Mb PTG and NGC . In view of the above, learned standing counsel submits that appellants are not d isputing the assessment of the freight assessed by the learned Tribunal. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the sub missions made by the learned counsel for the parties, I do not find any illegali ty or impropriety in the order passed by the learned Tribunal. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the appellant-Union of India is hereby dismissed at the admissi on stage. No costs.