IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 14TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 23RD BHADRA 1932 WP(C).No. 27334 of 2010(N) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. HRIDAYA K.PRABHAKARAN,AGED 22 YEARS, D/O.K.PRABHAKARAN,HRIDAYA BHAVAN, THAIKKATTUKARA PO,ALUVA-683 106. 2. ASHUTHOSH KUMAR,AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.JAGDISH OJHA, NAGA ROAD,SHIVPURI, RAXAUL,EAST CHAMPARAM,BIHAR-845 305. 3. SHARIQUE SHAMIM HASHMI,AGED 24 YEARS, S/O. MR.SHAMIM AHMAD, "RAZIYA MANSION", OLD AZIMABAD COLONY,SULTHANGANJ,PATNA-800 006. BY ADV. SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (CUSAT),KOCHI-22. 2. REGISTRAR,COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,KOCHI-22. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,COCHI U THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: kl. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 27334 of 2010 N ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 14th day of September, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners have completed their B.Tech degree course from the Cochin University of Science and Technology. Petitioners 1 and 3 failed in their 7th semester examination in the subject 'Language processor Lab' and the third petitioner failed in the subject 'Digital Electronic Lab Examination' of 4th semester and the 'Language processors Lab Examination' of the 7th semester. It is stated that they have appeared for the supplementary examination held in July and April, 2010. According to the petitioners, they were informed by the Principal of the College that they have passed the supplementary examination. In this writ petition, they are praying for a direction to the University to issue consolidated mark lists incorporating the results of the supplementary examination as well. 2. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents informed that so far the Principal has not forwarded the marks of the petitioners in the supplementary examination to the University. If that be the actual factual position, at this stage, WPC.27334/2010 : 2 : this Court cannot direct the University to issue the consolidated mark lists as sought for. 3. In such circumstances, I direct the petitioners to produce a copy of this judgment before the Principal of the College, who shall, if the supplementary marks are ready, within two weeks thereafter, forward the marks of the petitioners in the supplementary examination in which they have appeared to the University. It is directed that when the respondents receive the supplementary marks as above, they shall issue consolidated mark lists to the petitioners without any further delay. 4. Petitioners shall produce copy of this judgment before the Principal and the second respondent along with copy of the writ petition for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge