IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27295 of 2009 SHIV SHARAN RAM & ANR Versus STTAE OF BIHAR ----------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar No.1, Advocate. For the State : Mr. B.B. Prashant, A.P.P. ---------- 5. 20.5.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners had been granted bail vide order dated 23.4.2010, however, in the top of the order while describing the address of the petitioners the district had been shown as East Champaran, which should have been West Champaran as has been described in the petition itself. It is submitted that obviously, it is a typographical error. Learned A.P.P. for the State raises no objection. In the above view of the matter, the district of the petitioners while describing their address be deemed to be West Champaran in place of East Champaran. The order dated 23.4.2010 stands modified to the aforesaid extent only. 2 Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through fax at the cost of the petitioners. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)