IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10095 of 2008 Between: Kandi Ramayya S/o. Kandi Peddappayya R/o. Pedapenki Village, Balijapet Mandal, Vizianagaram District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Parvathipuram. 3 The Thasildar, Balijapet Mandal, Vizianagaram District. 4 Dutti Kavitha W/o. Burri Srinivasulu R/o. Pedapenki Village, Balijapet Mandal, Vizianagaram District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.SRIDHAR Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “In view of the facts stated above it is just and necessary that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any Writ, order or direction more in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, call for the records and declare the action of the 2nd respondent herein issuing the notification vide R.C.No.1363/20085/H, dated 11.03.2008 and appointing the 4th respondent as fair price shop dealer for the 4th fair price shop, Pedapenki Village as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of G.O.Ms.No.183, dated 16.12.1997 and consequently cancel the appointment made pursuant to the issue of the above said notification.” At the hearing, Sri S.Sridhar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal against the impugned order. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.13270 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 1st MAY, 2008 kvni