IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2502 of 2011 along with CWP Nos. 2503 of 2011 to 2513 of 2011. Decided on: April 26, 2011 1. CWP No. 2502 of 2011 Rai Singh Vs. State of H.P. and ors. 2. CWP No. 2503 of 2011 Jainoo Devi Vs. State of H.P. and ors. 3. CWP No. 2504 of 2011 Gita Vs. State of H.P. and ors. 4. CWP No. 2505 of 2011 Durma Devi Vs. State of H.P. and ors. 5. CWP No. 2506 of 2011 Pyare Lal Vs. State of H.P. and ors. 6. CWP No. 2507 of 2011 Hari Chand Vs. State of H.P. and ors. 7. CWP No. 2508 of 2011 Kasu Devi Vs. State of H.P. and ors. 8. CWP No. 2509 of 2011 Jia Lal Vs. State of H.P. and ors. 9. CWP No. 2510 of 2011 Goda Devi Vs. State of H.P. and ors. 10. CWP No. 2511 of 2011 Tula Ram Vs. State of H.P. and ors. 11. CWP No. 2512 of 2011 Parma Nand Vs. State of H.P. and ors. 12. CWP No. 2513 of 2011 Ishwar Dutt Vs. State of H.P. and ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. I. D. Bali, Senior Advocate with Mr. K. G. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2 Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) All the petitioners herein are Part Time Water Carriers. Learned Senior Counsel submitted that after completion of the required number of years of part-time service they have to be conferred daily wage status and after ten years of daily wage status they are entitled to regularization of their services. Reference is invited to the order which is produced as Annexure P-1 wherein there is a reference to Government order dated 11.7.2006. Learned Senior Counsel submits that the third respondent may be directed to examine the factual and legal position and take appropriate action in accordance with law. 2. There will be a direction to the third respondent to look into the matter on production of copy of the judgment alongwith copy of writ petition by the petitioner concerned before the third respondent and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law and justice within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition. It is made clear that in case any other petitioner is granted daily wage status with retrospective date, such petitioner shall not be entitled to actual back wages for the said period since they have not actually worked in the post. However, they shall be entitled to count the said period for the purpose of regularization. 3. These writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice April 26, 2011 (Justice Sanjay Karol), (PK/C) Judge.