HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITIONS No:4991 & 5525 OF 2010 Dated: 24.12.2010 Between: Suraneni Venkateswara Rao. ..Petitioner And Velagapudi Rama Rao .. Respondent This Court made the following HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITIONS No:4991 & 5525 OF 2010 COMMON ORDER: Since the issue involved in both the revisions is one and the same, these revisions are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff and the respondent is the defendant. These revisions are filed by the petitioner-plaintiff seeking to revise the orders dated 15.7.2010 passed in I.A.Nos.183 and 184 of 2010 in O.S.No.146 of 2006 by the IV Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC), Vijayawada. The respondent-defendant filed the above I.As seeking to reopen the suit for the purpose of cross-examination of P.W.1 and recall P.W.1 for cross examination. The Court below having observed that chief affidavit of P.W.1 was filed on 25.2.2009 and since then P.W.1 appeared before the Court on 14 adjournments and thereafter, P.W.1 was recalled for marking documents and inspite of that, the defendant did not come forward to cross-examine P.W.1, but however, as the contents of the written statement of the defendant were not put to P.W.1 for cross-examination, it is a fit case to recall P.W.1, allowed the above I.As subject to payment of costs. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner-plaintiff filed the present revisions. Heard the learned Counsel and perused the material available on record. In a case of this nature, regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Courts exercise its discretion. In the case on hand, the defendant did not cross-examine P.W.1 on earlier occasion and for failure on his part inspite of appearance of P.W.1 on many occasions, costs were levied. Apart from that, the orders under revision do not cause any prejudice to either of the parties and they are helpful for better adjudication of the matter. I do not find any irregularity in the discretion exercised by the Court below in passing the orders under revision. In this view of the matter and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, I have no hesitation to hold that the orders under revision do not warrant any interference by this Court and hence, the revisions are liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________________ Justice A. Gopal Reddy Date: 24th December, 2010 Nn. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITIONS No:4991 & 5525 OF 2010 24.12.2010