IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH JULY 2009 / 24TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 19909 of 2009(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SHAMSUDEENKUNJU, AGED 47 YEARS VENGAYILPUTHENVEEDU, VENGA.P.O., SASTHAMKOTTA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.BIMAL K.NATH RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, TRIVANDRUM. 2. KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, KARUNAGAPPALLY BRANCH REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. THE TAHSILDAR (RR) KUNNATHOOR TALUK SHASTHAMKOTTA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. MR. POOVAPPALLY M. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ........................................................................ W.P.(C) No. 19909 OF 2009 ......................................................................... Dated this the 15th July, 2009 J U D G M E N T The only grievance projected in this Writ Petition is in respect of the inaction on the part of the first respondent in considering Ext. P8 representation preferred by the petitioner for the benefit of 'OTS'. The petitioner is aggrieved in so far as the first respondent has not complied with the direction given by this Court in Ext. P3 judgment, though the petitioner has already discharged the duty cast upon him in this regard. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that his grievance has been highlighted in Ext. P8 representation and interference of this Court to have it finalised, is prayed for; particularly in view of the fact that respondents are proceeding with coercive steps against the petitioner without passing any orders on Ext. P8 representation. 2. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. W.P.(C) No. 19909 OF 2009 2 1 and 2 and the learned Government Pleader for respondent No.3. 3. After considering the facts and figures, the first respondent is directed to consider Ext. P8 representation and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. It is made clear that till such appropriate orders are passed on Ext. P8 representation, all further coercive steps stated as being pursued against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk