C.R. No. 6198 of 2009 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 6198 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 27, 2009 Prem Rani …..Petitioner Vs. Bimla Devi and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. L.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) The application filed by the petitioner under Section 10 CPC to stay the proceedings in suit Bimla Devi Vs.Sugni Devi has been dismissed by the trial Court, on the ground that the reading of the plaints in earlier two suits indicate that the parties to the suit are not litigating under the same title and that the matter in issue in both the earlier filed civil suits and the abovesaid suit is not directly and substantially the same, as such Section 10 of CPC will not be attracted. C.R. No. 6198 of 2009 [2] Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the dispute is regarding the validity of the Will alleged to have been executed by Ladhu Ram. Ladhu Ram had four daughters-Simla Devi, Savitri Devi, Susheela Devi and Neelam. Sugni is wife of deceased Ladhu Ram. It appears that Ladhu Ram had allegedly executed a Will in favour of Karam Singh. After the death of Karam Singh, the property is being claimed by his wife Prem Rani, the petitioner. The other cases Sugni Devi Vs. Prem Rani and Prem Rani Vs. Sugni Devi seem to be involving the dispute regarding the inheritance of moveable and immoveable assets of Ladhu Ram. After going through the impugned order, I am of the opinion that no illegality can be found in the order passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sirsa, dated September 9, 2009 dismissing the application under Section 10 CPC filed by the petitioner. However, it is made clear that dismissal of the application under Section 10 CPC will not debar the petitioner to move an application before the District Judge to get all the cases transferred to one Court as all cases pertain to the property of same person. It will be open to the District Judge to consider whether all the cases are required to be decided simultaneously by one Court to finally settle the rights of the parties or these can proceed separately in separate Courts. Disposed of. October 27, 2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE