THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A.No.713 of 2006 JUDGMENT: The appellant filed O.S.No.108 of 2006 in the Court of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar against the respondents for the relief of declaration of title, recovery of possession and cancellation of certain sale deeds in respect of the suit schedule property. It is stated that the suit has now been transferred to the Court of VII Additional Senior Civil Judge (Fast Track Court), Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar. The appellant filed I.A.No.148 of 2006 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. with a prayer to restrain respondents 1 and 2 herein from making further constructions over the basement and foundation raised by the 2nd respondent. The trial Court dismissed the I.A. through order, dated 03.06.2006. Hence, this C.M.A. under Order 43 Rue 1 C.P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. The appeal is filed against the 2nd respondent alone. Though proof of service of notice on her is filed, she has not chosen to enter appearance. The appellant claimed different categories of reliefs against the respondents. The I.A. was filed with a view to protect her interest during the pendency of the suit. The trial court discussed the matter at length and dismissed the I.A. One fact which prompts this Court not to deal with the merits is that way back on 24.08.2006, an order of status quo was passed by this Court in C.M.A.M.P.No.1439 of 2006. That order is in force for the past four years. The same arrangement can remain during the pendency of the suit also. Hence, the C.M.A. is allowed and the order under appeal is set aside. Consequently, the I.A. is allowed directing that the parties shall maintain status quo in relation to the suit schedule property till the disposal of the suit. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 25.08.2010 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.M.A.No.713 of 2006 Date: 25.08.2010 JSU