IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 12230 of 2008 Between: S.B. Nasar S/o. Late Nasar Bin Omer Nalgonda District, R/o. H.No. 23-3-205, Sultan Shahi, Hyderabad- 065 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Narkatpally Depot, Nalgonda District. 2 The Secretary ,P.F. Trust, APSRTC Bus Bhavan, Musheerabad, Hyderabad-020 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the representation dt. 20-3-2008 adn 10- 4-2008 with regards to payment of P.F. by re-verifying the P.F. Account and computing the total P.F. Amount not verify the P.F. amount and not considering petitioner is as illegal, unjust contrary to law arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.MOHD.GHOUSEUDDIN Counsel for the Respondents: SMT.B.G.UMA DEVI The Court made the following ORDER: The petitioner was employed as a Conductor in A.P.S.R.T.C. in the year 1974. Subsequently, he earned various promotions and retired from service on 30.09.2003 as Controller. He was paid the retirement benefits including the provident fund. According to him, substantial amount remained unpaid, and made representations, dated 20.03.2008 and 10.04.2008. His grievance is that no action has been taken thereon. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The petitioner admits that he has been paid some amount towards provident fund, but claims that substantial amount remains unpaid. He has furnished the particulars also in his representations referred to above. The respondents are under obligation to examine the representations and take necessary action thereon. In view of the fact that the petitioner had retired from service, his representations cannot be kept pending indefinitely. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to pass appropriate orders on the representations, dated 20.03.2008 and 10.04.2008, made by the petitioner, within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:13.06.2008. kdl ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}