Crl.M.No.M-29334 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-29334 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:October 5, 2010 Akhtar and others .....Petitioners v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Satish Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. ....... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.52461 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-29334 of 2010 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.267 of 2010, dated 10.8.2009, under Sections 395/397 IPC and Sections 25/54/59 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Hathin, District Palwal. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the impugned order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Palwal, vide which application filed on behalf of the present petitioners for anticipatory bail was dismissed. Brief allegations against the petitioners-accused are that all of them while armed with deadly weapons including fire-arms way-laid the complainant and looted Rs.55,000/-. Names of petitioners-accused have been mentioned in the FIR itself. It is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioners- Akhtar, Rahish, Jammu, Jamil, Ahmad, Nashir, Akhtar and Yakub for grant Crl.M.No.M-29334 of 2010 (O&M) -2- of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 5.10.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge