IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1551 of 2008 1. BINAY PRASAD 2. DHRUB PRASAD 3. GANESH PRASAD ALL RESIDENCE OF VILLAGE- D.K. SHIKARPUR, P.S.- SHIKARPUR, DIST- WEST CHAPARAN (BETTIAH). 4. SABIR MIYAN, S/O- LATE SHEIKH GAFFAR 5. MUNNA DIWAN, S/O- ABDUL RAHIM BOTH RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE HARPUR, PIPRA, ,P.S.- GAUNAHA. 6. MANIR MIYA, S/O- LATE SHEIKH SAMSUL, R/O- VILLAGE SATWARIYA, P.S.- SHIKARPUR, DISTT. WEST CHAMPARAN (BETTIAH) Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 20.08.2010 No body appears on behalf of the petitioners as well as the State. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 3.9.2008 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C. -III, West Champaran in Sessions Case no. 458 of 2006. By the impugned order, their application filed under Section 227 of Cr.P.C. was considered and rejected. It appears from the order impugned that a submission was advanced on behalf of the petitioners that the reason for the occurrence is land dispute. Petitioners had to take protection from the police in order to take possession over the land. It is the case of the petitioners that when they went there, they found dead body of a woman. Learned trial court considered those arguments in the light of materials available on record including the first information report. Let it be recorded that the petitioners are facing charge(s) 2 under sections of the Indian Penal Code including Section 302 IPC and diverse sections of the Arms Act. Learned trial court has thus found that there is/are adequate materials on record justifying framing of charge. This Court on perusal of the pleadings made in the application, including the impugned order, is satisfied that the order impugned does not suffer from any patent illegality meriting interference. The application has no merit. It is accordingly dismissed. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )