HiGH COURTOF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SATISH K. AGNIMOTR!, J. WRiT PETITION (Si N0.2000 OF 2007S.B. PETITiONER Vs. Smt. Sumitra Devi Bhandeker, W/o. Shri Madhow tal Bhandeker aged about 40 years, Assistant Teacher, Presentty posted at Govt. Primary School Baihar Block - Arang Dist- Raipur(C.G.} RESPONDENTS 1. State of Ghhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Dist - Raipur(C.G.) 2. The District Education OfRcer, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Block Education OfRcer Arang, District-Raipur(C.G.) Shri C.R.Sahu, counse! forthe petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer forthe State / respondents. (Passed on 03rd Aprii, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as weil as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and question of !av/ involved in the present writ petition are the same to that in Yashwant Kumar Bharadv/aj Vs. MunfeipaS Corporation, Durg and anofher <• {2006 (I!) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Learned counse! appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. 2. Insubsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh :^':rfS?\;ift^3Wi'^^ %S^^S>^i^KSiSiSSs ^iS^^^^^^sSSW^^^^^^^'f^sws's'ss ^^^^&SSiSSi?;SS !S^KSS^^^S^S^^^^^ "^ 18[^ ^i l^ -A- and another) and other connected matters, decided by this Court on 15.12.2006, pursuant tothe memo dated 28.01.1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the prospectus of Dipioma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature of the Basic Training Institute, i.e. B.T.i. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma Vs.TheState ofGovt. of Chhattisgarh and another)(Supra). (3) Accordingly, the writ pstition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired D.Ed. Examinatlon Certificate on her own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether she has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ^^^;:fe^fc%^5^t;SS?^%^'^;^A:i-;.;