IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 28964 of 2008 Between: Naidu Veera Venkata Srinivasulu S/o Naidu Mallapa Raju Door No.12-238 Near LIC Office Jangareddygudem W.G District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt of A.P revenue Department Rep.by the Revenue Divsional Officer Jangareddygudem W.G District 2 The Tahasildar Jangareddygudem W.G District 3 Sri Dasari Venkata Satya Vishnu Murthy S/o.Anjaneyulu R/o. Rajavaram(V) Koyalagudem(M) W.G District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring action of the 1st respondent in not deciding the case in respect of land situated in R.SyNo.424 admeasuring Ac 3-00 cents from out of Ac 6-00 purchased by me situated at Kethavaram(V) Jangareddy gudum(M) and Division W.G District pursuant to the notice dt 15- 11-2008 in RC No.878/2008/A as arbitrary illegal failure to exercise power vested with him violative and principles of natural justice violative of procedure contemplated under the A.P Record of Rights (issuance of Pattadar pass Book Act 1989) for brevity "Act" violative of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 19 and constitutional Right guranteed under Article 300-A of the constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent to decide the case pending before him and at an early date and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.V.R.RUDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO.28964 OF 2008 ORAL ORDER Sri Suman, Advocate representing Sri C.V.R.Rudra Prasad, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the said submission the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 3rd JUNE 2009 *TSNR