HIQH C(XJRT OF CHHATTBGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: W)N"BLE SHIU RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. ^ Appellants Claimants Misc. Appeal (Cl No. 250 of 2006 1. Smt Uttara Bai, Wd/o Mani Ram Sahu, aged about 29years 2. Man Slngh Sahu, Slo Mani Ram Sahu, aged about 10 years 3 Ku Janaki, D/o h4ani Ram Sahu, agedabout 9 years 4 Ku Manisha, D/o Mani Ram Sahu, aged about 7 years 5 Karan Sahu, S/o Manl Ram Sahu, aged about 5 years 6 Kul Singh Sahu, SA) Late Laxmem Sahu, aged about 70 years 7 Smt Bodhani Bai, WA» Kut Singh Sahu, aged about 65 years 8 Ganesh, S/o Mani Ram Sahu, aged about10years Appellant Nos.2, 3, 4, 5 and 8 are represented by legal guardian mrther Smt Uttara Bai. All R/o \ \ Sarona, PO Tatibandh, PS Amanaka, Raipur, Tah & Distt Raipur VERSUS Respondents Non-Applteants 1. Rukum Lal Verma, S/o Pardesi Ram Verma, R/o Bazar Chowk, Bhanpuri, Raipur, PS Khamatarai, Di^tRsd(Kir 2. The New tndfa Insurance Co. Ltd., s^--T^ By Divisional IVIanager, The New India Insurance Co. Ltd., Bramch No.2, 2nd Floor, RDA Buitding Bajrang Market, GE Road, Ra4?ur, Distt Raipur (CG) MISC. APPEAL UNDERSECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHJCI.ES ACT. Present: Shri S.C. Verma, counsel for the appellants. Shri Aditya Sharma, counsel on behalf of Shri Sourabh Sharma, counsel for respmdent No.2. ORDER (84th March, 2011) The following order of the Gaurt wss passed by Raj^w Gupta, C.J. Shri S.C. Verma, learned counset forthe appellants seete permission to withdraw the appeal filed by the appetlants/ claimants for enhancement of the compensation awaN'dKl by the Ninth Additional Motor Acctclent Claims Tribunal, Raipur, vide award dated 24.02.2006, passed in ClaimCase No.64/2005. 2) Pennission granted. - 3) The appeal, therefore, re^dfemissed aswithdrawn. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Rangnath Chasidrakar Judge nimmi