1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1831 OF 1990 M/s. Bush India Ltd. & Anr. ..Petitioners. v/s. Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1944 OF 1990 M/s. Bush India Ltd. & Anr. ..Petitioners. v/s. Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2268 OF 1990 M/s. Bush India Ltd. & Anr. ..Petitioners. v/s. Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2981 OF 1990 M/s. Bush India Ltd. & Anr. ..Petitioners. v/s. Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents. 2 Ms.Tulzi Zaveri i/b. Kama & Co. for Petitioners. Mr.A.S.Rao with Mrs.S.V.Bharucha for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in WP 1831/90, 2981/90 & 3310/90. Mrs. S.V.Bharucha with Mr.A.S.Rao for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in WP 2268/90. Mr.P.S.Jetly for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 in WP 1944/90. Mr.U.J.Makhija, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Parag Khandhar i/b. Mulla & Mulla & C.B.& Caroe for Respondent No.4 in WP 1944/90 CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & A.M. KHANWILKAR, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 7, 2009 P.C. : 1. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the original Petitioners contends that the Petitioner No.1 is in liquidation. Copy of the Order of the liquidation has not been brought to our attention, nor Official Liquidator’s report is brought on record. Petitioner No.2 was the Manager of Petitioner No.1. 2. When rule was issued, the Petitioner was allowed to clear the goods against the Additional licence on executing ITC bond. Similar issues in Writ Petition No. 2433 of 1990 alongwith several other Petitions have been heard and reserved for Judgment. 3. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners produces a copy of letter dated 10th September, 2009. That copy is endorsed to the Counsel for the Petitioner. In the said letter, it appears that M/s. Bush India Ltd was renamed as M/s. Zadona Electronics Ltd. and it further indicates that it is in liquidation. 3 4. Considering the facts of the instant case, in our opinion, no purpose would be served in keeping this Petition pending in this Court. Moreso, as the Petitioner No.2 can proceed with the Petition irrespective of the fact that Petitioner No.1 is in liquidation. In the light of the fact following order: (i) Rule is discharged. (ii) Assessing Officer shall proceed to pass final order of assessment after giving notice to the Official Liquidator, Bombay insofar as the Petitioner No.1 is concerned and after considering Judgment to be passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.2433 of 1990 and other Petitions. (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)