IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINTIAL Writ Petition No. 1244 (SS) of 2011 Smt. Beena Jeena …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents Mr. N.S. Negi, learned counsel present for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned standing counsel present for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. N.S. Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned standing counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. The petitioner is a graduate and is working as on the post of “Shiksha Mitra”. According to the petitioner, there is a scheme to send those Shiksha Mitra, who are graduates, for the two years Diploma in Elementary Education (D.L.Ed.), but the name of the petitioner has not been sent. Learned standing counsel submitted that name of the petitioner has not been sent for doing the Diploma in Elementary Education for the reason that perhaps the petitioner was not graduate at that time. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has done his graduation in the year 2010. With this set of facts, the matter is sent to the Principal, D.I.E.T., Bhimtal, Nainital to consider the case of the petitioner and in case the petitioner fulfills all the requisite requirements, without further delay the name of the petitioner may be sent for two years Diploma in Elementary Education (D.L.Ed.) in case the petitioner is otherwise eligible including graduation. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of finally. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) Dated: 20.09.2011 VKG