IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10187 of 2006 SUSHIL KUMAR & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 18.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the two orders contained in Annexure – 1 as well as Annexure – 3, this Court is of the opinion that there is no legal infirmity whatsoever in the two decisions, if the petitioners are in a helpless situation today it is because of thereon enaction on their behalf of not depositing and demanding renewal of the license even within the extended time provided under the rules. There is no occasion for this Court to interfere with the orders. The writ application is dismissed. Rajeev/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)