IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 2ND SEPTEMBER 2008 / 11TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 26428 of 2008(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: 1 ------------- ANOOP C., CHEMBOLI HOUSE, THALAKULATHOOR P.O., CALICUT , DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.ALI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., PIN 673 635. 2. HE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION UNIVERSITY OF CALIUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., PIN 673 635 BY SHRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.26428 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner appeared for the 8th semester B.Tech. (Electronics & Communication) examination in June, 2008. Dissatisfied with the result of one paper, viz., “Micro Electronic Technology”, the petitioner is stated to have filed Ext.P1 application for revaluation. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to complete the revaluation process expeditiously. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the University submits that the University would require at least two more months' time to complete the revaluation process. 3. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondent to complete the revaluation process for which the petitioner has submitted Ext.P1 application and publish the results thereof, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, provided the application is in order in all respects. After the revaluation is over, the petitioner shall be favoured with a photocopy of the answer paper on usual terms. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2