IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.216 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Anil Sharma ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: March 11, 2010 ____________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.292 of 2009 Under Sections 386 and 120-B of IPC Police Station Kotwali Ranipur, District Haridwar ________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri S.K. Shandiliya, Advocate for the applicant as well as Sri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State and also perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is not working on behalf of the accused Sunil Rathi and he had not demanded any money from the complainant. It is further submitted that the applicant and the complainant were the business partners and the First Information Report has been lodged against the applicant due to some business dispute. It is further submitted that the co-accused Dharmendra has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 10.03.2010 and the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant-Anil Sharma be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. The bail application as well as the urgency application no.870 of 2010 both stand disposed of accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 11.03.2010 RG