C^( f^6~7 .-f'/ ^ / ,/ ^w ^./, ./ ^w ^y7 <^^" v IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH •f^ WRITPETITIONfS)NO. ^2--3). /2009 Deo Ram Sinha, (Wrongly mentioned as Deonarayan Sinha in impugned order) S/o- Shri Manraldian Sinha, Aged about 56 years, R/o- Village-Kariha, Tehsil-Charama, Distt. Kaiiker, C.G. Presently working as Head Master, In Govt. Primary School-Kilepar, Distt. Kanker, Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER VERSUS State ofChliattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Deptt. ofAdim Jati & Anusuchit Janjati Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Kanker, Distt. Kanker, Chhattisgarh. District Education Officer, Kanker, Distt-Kanker, Chliattisgarh. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE ^F APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI ETC. ^^y.,, :G—78 7CT ^^T ^ll^Krt^ ^tTl^^Ko, T®icrll<rl^< 'WWIT'Si^lch' ^?r'q^^ (^jf^^r) 200^1 I^i^^^3^1 SB : HON'BLB SHRE JUSTICB PKJTINKBR DIWAKER 10.08.2009 Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Ms. SunitaJain, P.L. fort c}3unsel for the petitioner. \ie State. Challenge in the preserj 30,6.2009 (Annexure P/l) passc petitioner who is working as He^ School, Kiiepar, Block Charama| School Education Department h4s Budhkattapara, Malkot, Block K<j First contention of the c<| petitioner could not have bee^ another as the seniority of th| district wise. Second contentionl of School Education Departmenl has been transferred in a schocfl Department and the order ha|s Department which is not permis? Contention of counsel foj make a representation to respojndent decided in accordance with law. Counsel for the petition^ However he submits that till petitioner may be given some pr41 ^Rfepfrr 'Riq^f ^ fe%t <H3i^s< ^affOTa^l \t petition is to the order dated Id by respondent No. 1 by which the .dmaster in the Government Primary Distt. Kanker, a school run by the been transferred to Primary School >ndagaon, Distt. Jagdalpur. t>unsel for the petitioner is that the bi transferred from one dlstrict to Headmaster is being maintained is that the petitioner is an employee whereas by the impugned order he which is run by the Tribal Welfare also been issued by the Tribal dble. the state is that let the petitioner No. 1 aiid the same would be |r agrees to make a representa.tion. his representation is decided, the ^tective order. ^T--^ XI-BC—78 ^pt¥?^i'^T^ ^^T ^TI^i'^jW ~3^E? ^jiqi^^ ^til^^Ko, f®i<ni^^< w^^te>-w--e'-te-5-l^y--wi 2001/ ^?i Tra^T (^t^3^) i^TW^fel 311^1 <^Rfei^^ ^TO^* ^* 'fe^ ^f^R ^aiRR 3?i^i •"vf -<rt' ^ Accordingly^ the petition isj petitioner to make a representatic] the date of receipt of the copy decided within a period of three w| then the impugned order shall notj be allowed to perform his duties irj disposed of with a direction to the )n within a period of ten days from of this order^ the same would be ^eks from the date of its receipt. Till be given effect to and the petitioner his present place of posting^__- Sd/- pritinkerDiwaker Judge