IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 443 OF 2010 MISS REKHA LOVU NAIK ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. VITHAL SAGUN GAONKAR ... Respondent Mr. Amey Kakodkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 10th December, 2010 P.C: By this petition the petitioners challenge the judgment and order dated 9/3/2010 passed by the learned District Judge-I, South Goa at Margao in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal no.9/2010 against the order dated 14/1/2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge Junior Division at Sanguem in Regular Civil Suit No.16/2009 by which the application for injunction filed by the petitioner/plaintiff restraining the defendants from carrying out any construction work and/or interfering with the suit plot was dismissed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner I find that this is not a fit case in which this Court should exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The findings recorded by both the Courts below cannot be said to be perverse warranting inference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the petition has no merit and is accordingly dismissed. At this stage Mr. Kakodkar states that evidence in the main suit has already started and prays for an order for expeditious disposal of the suit. I am not inclined to pass such an order without ascertaining the number of matters pending before the learned Civil Judge. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file such an application before the trial court. Needless to mention that the trial Court shall deal with such an application, in case filed, in accordance with law. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-