IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2009 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 16831 of 2009(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. BARATHAN, S/O. LATE APPUTTY, AGED 63 YEARS, PEEDIKA KANDI HOUSE, P.O.KOLATHARA, KOZHIKODE. 2. NARAYANI, W/O. LATE KUMARAN, PEEDIKA KANDI HOUSE, P.O.KOLATHARA, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.R.SUDHISH SMT.M.MANJU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOZHIKODE. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KOZHIKODE TALUK. 4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT, KOZHIKODE. 5. OLAVANNA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, OLAVANNA, KOZHIKODE. 6. RAVEENDRAN V.P., (RETIRED TEACHER), S/O. PERACHAN, AGED 56 YEARS, VALLAPALLI HOUSE, P.O.KOLATHARA, KOZHIKODE-673 655. BY GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).16831/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 18th day of June, 2009 JUDGMENT In the nature of the direction proposed to be issued by me, I do not think it is necessary to issue notice to respondents 5 and 6. 2. The limited complaint raised by the petitioners relates to the non service of a copy of the order, on an appeal preferred before the RDO and which is stated to have been heard on 9.6.2009, as evidenced by Ext.P2 and thereafter on 12.6.2009. 3. If orders have been passed on the appeal preferred by the petitioners as referred to in Ext.P2, same shall be supplied to them within one week from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. Status quo as regards the properties claimed by the petitioners and forming subject matter of the appeal shall be maintained for a period of two weeks from today. Thereafter, it shall abide by any orders that W.P.(C).16831/2009 2 the District Collector may pass provided the petitioners file a revision and move for appropriate interim orders. I make it clear that I have not considered the petitioners' contentions on merits. Writ petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs