IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.13258 of 2010 PRESH RAM YADAV @ PARSU RAM YADAV, son of Chandrama Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr. Misc. No. 13377 of 2010 1. RAM AWADHESH YADAV son of Ram Swarup Yadav, & 2. Jhunnu Lal Rai @ Jhuna Lal Rai, son of Bachu Rai, 3. Raju Rai son of Ram Lakhan Rai Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 28.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 272, 273, 420 and 120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 47-A of the Excise Act. Considering that the petitioners are the first offenders and are in custody since 11.2.2010, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Arrah, in connection with Arrah Muffasil P.S. Case no.26 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar - 2 - nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse,(iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)