4 IN Ttl^ ttlOH COURT OF JUDtGATUHE AT BILASPUR CHHAmSGARH PETITIONBR RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION No.^3^7/2005 : Champak Bhattacharya, S/o. Late Ajit Bhattacharya, aged about 55 years, R/o. B- 2, Anant Bihar Colony, Daldal Seoni Road, Mowa, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS ( 1. Secretary, C.G.Legislative Assembly, Vidhansabha, Vidhansabha Secretariat, Raipur. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, general Administration, D.K. S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). , 3. Udyami Vikas Sansthan, 35, Shyamala Hills, Bhopal, Through Managing Director. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTIONS/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. ^^>^. ^$?x ^^^^^ ^'^^' v^y .*" 1 • HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 4367 of 2005 Petitioner ChaEapak Bhattacharya Versus Respondents Secretaiy, C,G, Legislative Assembly & others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri S. K, Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms Sunita Jam, Panel Lawyer for fhe respondents No. 1 & 2, Shri Amit Verma, Advocate for the respondent No.3. O RD E R torall ( Passed on this 16th day ofSeptember, 2009) Heard. 1. Learaed coiinsel appearing for the petitioner, on nistructions, submits that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to wifhdraw this petitiou, as wifh fhe passage of tiiae the writ petition has becoiae iafructuous. 2. Learaed coiinsel appeanng for fhe respondents have no objection. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as haviug becoiae iafructuous. ——— Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge