1 WP : 2004/2003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2004 OF 2003 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1054 OF 1998 IN BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT SUIT NO.2356 OF 1997 Shantilal Kalyanji Kamdar .... Petitioners (deceased thru LRs.) Vs. Mohanlal Lalchand Kamdar .... Respondents & Ors. Mr. A.K. Mudnaney, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. Umesh Wale, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. A.K. Goel i/by Mr. V.A. Goel, Advocate for respondent no.6. Coram : Smt. R.P.SondurBaldota, J. Date : 20th September, 2010 P.C. 1. This petition challenges the order dated 8th October 1998 passed by Bombay City Civil Court rejecting the Chamber Summons taken out by the petitioner for impleading himself to the suit filed by respondent no.1. By the said suit, respondent no.1 sought a mandatory injunction directing the defendants to the suit to pay the municipal taxes, as also to deposit in court the rent collected in respect of the premises in the suit property. 2 WP : 2004/2003 2. The learned counsel for the respondent no.1 states that he has received a letter, by which respondent no.1 has informed that respondent no.1 has assigned and transferred his share in the suit property and that he does not desire to pursue the matter any further. He has also requested the learned counsel to withdraw any proceedings filed by him in respect of property in any court of law. Thus, there are clear instructions for withdrawal of the suit filed by respondent no.1 from which the present petition arises. It has also been brought to the notice of the court that the petitioner has filed a substantive suit in this court, which fact is not disputed by the petitioner. In that case, nothing survives in the petition and the same is accordingly disposed off. The photocopy of the letter dated 20th September 2010 of respondent no. 1 is taken on file and marked X”. “ (Smt. R.P.SondurBaldota, J.)