IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22448 of 2011 Date of Decision: 0909.2011 Rakesh Mahajan . . .Petitioner Versus State of Punjab . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.R.S. Rawat, AAG, Punjab. Mr.Sumeet Puri, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is encashment of policy of the complainant as nominee of an amount of `32,171/-. He further submits the said amount has already been deposited in the account of the complainant. This fact is admitted by learned counsel for the complainant and he also conceded that there is no amount due towards the petitioner. Be that as it may, without making any observation on merit of the case, since the petitioner has joined the investigation and this fact is admitted by learned State counsel, on instructions received form ASI Kuldeep Singh, order dated 27.7.2011 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. Petition is disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) SEPTEMBER 09 2011 JUDGE Vivek