(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 1813 OF 2011 Jagannath Narayanrao Shinde, Age : 50 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Gharni, Taluka : Chakur, District : Latur, .. Petitioners and 2 others. (Original defendants) versus Bhagwan Bhimrao Shinde, Age : 65 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Gharni, Taluka : Chakur, District : Latur, .. Respondents and 2 others. (Original plaintiffs) ....................... Mr. V.D. Gunale, Advocate, for the petitioners. ........................ CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 23RD MARCH 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. Heard Adv. Mr. V.D. Gunale, for the petitioners. (2) 2. The petitioners / original defendants have challenged the orders dated 23-8-2010 and 25-8-2010, passed below Exhibits 102 and 108, respectively, by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chakur, in Regular Civil Suit No. 67/2004. 3. In a suit expedited by High Court, the petitioners / defendants changed Advocate. The trial court gave new Advocate, reasonable time but again adjournment was sought. The trial court then directed the Advocate to conduct cross examination and as cross examination was not conducted, it has proceeded further. 4. I do not see any jurisdictional error or perversity. 5. In the circumstances, with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the impugned order, after the suit is finally decided, if occasion therefor arises, present petition is disposed of. No costs. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp1813