^: ..E m IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W. P. (S) No. (^^ /2010 ^< 'w PETITIONERS ,:^-?- ^y '^1""" 1. r Sukdev Prasad Chandrakar, S/o. Shri Anjor Ram Chandrakar, Aged about 30 years, Shiksha Karmi Grade- 03, Govt. Primary School, Bitkuli khurd, R/o-- Village Bisunpura, Post- Dashrangpur, Tahsil- Kawardha, Distt.- Kabirdham (C.G.) 2^Vinod Kumar Chandravanshi, S/o< Shri Manik Ram Chandravanshi, aged about 30 years, R/o- Village- Daujari, Tahsil- Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham(C.G.) 3. Gajanand Verma, S/o. Shri Mannuram Verma, Aged about 29 years, Govt. Primary School, Fadatod, R/o. Village- Bitkulikala, Post- Guda, T^hsil- Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) 4. Ramfal Chandravanshi S/o. Shri (Budharam Chandravanshi, aged about ^-y^ Village- Birkona, Post- Dharampura, Distt.- Kabirdham, (C.G.) >. Mansingh Chandrakar, S/o. Shri Ka^laram Chadrakar, Aged about 35 y^^rs, pos|ed G0vt. Primary School, BhiCT^pri, Ramngar, Ward no. 01, Javdan Road, Behind Saranwati, ^iishu mandir,, KawarA^ Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) ^ ^ 6. Ramkum^- Dhurwe S/o. Samaru Ram, aged about 27 years, R/o. Village- Bodhaikund, Post- Pondi, Tahsil- Kawardha, Distt." Kabirdham, (C.G.) 7. Trilok Chandravanshi, S/o. Shri Rikhiram Chandravanshi, aged about 32 years, R/o- village Jaukabhanda, Post- Marka, Tahsil- Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdhain (C.G.) <8. Anil Kumar Narang, S/o. Shri Kamta Prasad Narang, aged about 35 years, Govt. Primary School, Sonpuri, Block- Kawardha, Distt- Kabirdham, (C.G.) ^. Smt. Sima Sahu W/o. Dayalu Sahu, aged about 27 years, R/o. Village- Dehari, Post-Gopalbhaina, Tah.- Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) TO. Bharti Chandrakar, ^. , W/o. ^^ ^Vt-^v^' ^y^^^ Mohanlal Chandrakar, Post Paneka, ^ TahsilaKawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) 5/0 ^^ CU^·^^^^ 11. Manharan Chandrakar,) Shiksha P^r 3»C>Y^- Karmi Grade- 3, Govt.; Primary School, Koilari, Block- Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) 12. Kunjbihari Hathile, S/o. Bhajram, aged abnout ^-^years, R/o. Village- Devpura, Post- Pandaria Distt, Kabirdham (C.G.) r ^ /^^ ( %•' . A^T ^. ^i'^-i-T u.^ .' 'T^mTj^rr.j / | j '^// ^^y /• ^ 13. Rajendra Kumar Sharma, S/o. Peakhan Prasad Sharma, aged about 38 years, R/o. VUlage- Dullapur, Post- Raveli, (Kawardha) k Naresh Chandrakar, S/o. Prahlad, Chandrakar, aged about 32 years, Govt. Primary School, Khandsara, Post- Dashrangpur, Tahsil- Kawardha, Distt.- Kabirdham (C.G.) 15. Bhagwat Prasad Banjare, S/^. ^^\.-2< ^^_^ Shri Bhagwani Das,, Shiksha Karmi Grade-; 03, Govt. Primary School, Bhimpuri, R/o.- Village- Magrada, Post- Sonpuri, (Rani), Block- Kawardha, Distt.- Kabirdham (C.G.) 16. Pramendra Ghosi S/o. Narbadi Singh, Aged about 33 years, R/o. Civil Une Kowardha, P.S. Ghothiya, ^Distt. Kabirdham«^l)5^ ^^<^o, 17. Badri Sahu7^ Shiksha Karmi grade-3, Primary School, Pendra, Kawardha, Distt. - Kabirdham (C.G.) 18. Sawan Chandravanshi, S/o. Shri Bedram Chandravanshi, Aged about 26 years, R/o. Birkona, Post- Dharampura, P.S. Kosmanda, Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) 19. Rekhram Rajput, S/o. Mahetru Singh, aged about 29 years, R/o. Village- Kosmanda, Post- Jharioni, P.S. Kosmanda,, Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) -t RESPONDENTS ^ 20. Vijay Bahadur Singh, S/o. Rajkumar Singh, Aged about 29 years, R/o. Village & Post - Indosi, P.S. Mirmitti, Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) 21. Chandrahas Verma S/o. Ramcharan Verma, Aged about 28 years, R/o. Village- Sukhatal, post- Sarangpur (kala), Kawardha. 22. Kailash Chandravanshi S/o. Shatruhan, Chandravanshi, Aged about ^J2 years, Village- Daujapi, Post- Ramhepur, Distt. Kabirdhani. 23. Basant Kumar Ghritlahare, S/o. Shivkumar, aged about 33 years, Govt.Primary School, Jaitpuri,Block Pandariya, Distt. Kabirdham, (C.G.) 24. Ram Kumar Tiwari, S/o. Puna Prasad Tiwari,Aged about 33 years, Govt. Primary School^ Nagarda, Block-Kawardha, Distt.-Kabirdham, (C.G.) 25. Santosh KUmar Lanjhekar, S/o. ^^^ ^^y^i Shri Rikhiya Ram Lanjhekar,/tGovt. ' Primary School, Dullapur, Block Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham, (C.G.) 26. Smt. Laxmi Patre, D/o. Sudarshan Banjare, ^ _ ^.. W/o. Omprakash Patre, r7^Govt.Primary School, Bhaluchua, Block Bodla, Distf. Kabirdham, (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretaiy, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 7 ^ 2. Secretary, Department of Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, Kawardha, Distt., Kabirdham (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR SB : HON*BLB SHRI JU8TICB PRITIWKBRDIWAKBR PBTITIONBRS W.P.jSl N0. 6870/2010 Sukdev Prasad Chandrakar & Otiiers yersus RBSPONDBNTS State ofC.G. & Offaers WlNlt WFUTPBTITIQNUWDBRARTICLB2a60PTHB^C^ OF INDIA Shri Ravish Verma, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. for fhe State. ORDBR (01.12.2010) Counsel for fhe petitioners submits that he is not pressmg fhe petition on behatfofpetitioner No.23. Accordiagly, fhe petition on behalf of petitioner N0.23 is disxnissed as not pressed, Grievaace of the petitioners in fhis petition is fhat iaitiaUy they were appoiated as Contract Teacher Grade and thereafter as Shiksha Karmi but fhey are not beiag permitted to appear for the post of Head Master on fhe gax>und that fhey do not have fhe experience of seven years as Shiksha Karmi. 2. Counsel for the respondents/State subxmts that now the goverainent has taken a decision to penxiit aU. fhose Shiksha Kannis who have fhe experience of seven yeare either on the post of Contract Teacher or on the post of Shflcsha Kaniii aad therefore, fherc reinams iiothiag ia fhe present petition, He has shown fhe letter dated 19.11.2010 issued by the Director, Public Instructions, Raipur addressed to the Advocate General. Copy of the said letter has beeti given to Shri Verma also aad he is satisfied wifh. fhe same. C/ounsel for fhe petitioners subxmts fhat as fhe petitioners appreheiid that fhey may not be permitted to appear m fhe exammation, a direction ^ .'^^\ i; •'^.^^y^ ^ ..// d^ ^ / ^ niay be issued to fhe conipetent authority to penxiit them to appear m fhe said examiaation. 3. State counsel submits that fhe apprehensioxi of fhe petitionera is premature aad if tfaey have duly fiUed m the appUcation forms, the aufhority coriceraed would act pursuaat to fhe decision taken by the State Govemment vide letterdated 19.11.2010. 4. In the facts and circumstances of fhe case, as aofhiag survives m the petition, it is disposed of with a direction to the competent autfiority to permit the petitioners to appear m fhe examiaation for the post of Head Master pursuant to fhe decision teken by fhe State Gk>veninient subject to fhe venfication of fhe fact fhat the petitioners have filled ia fheir fomis and the saxae have been duly accepted by the autfaority concemed, If the grievaace of fhe petitioners still sundves^ fhey woiild be at liberty to approach fbis Court. — Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ^/