BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13190 of 2011 P. NATARAJAN ...PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE IDAYKOTTAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT CRIME NO. 88/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. D.VENKATESH Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAI PANDI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offences under Sections 294(b), 325 and 506(ii) IPC and Section 4 of the Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act in Crime No.88 of 2011, the petitioner has come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of prosecution, the de-facto complainant is the wife of the petitioner. The de-facto complainant has been suspecting the fidelity of the petitioner. Thus, resulted in a quarrel, it is alleged that in the said quarrel, the petitioner attacked the de-facto complainant with stick. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would deny all the above allegations. He would submit that due to matrimonial dispute, this false complaint has been preferred against the petitioner. 4.Having regard to the close relationship between the parties and the fact that there has been some domestic quarrel between them and all other attending circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but with conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the leanred Judicial Magistrate, Oddanchatram, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police offcier who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C . scrupulously. sd/- 18/10/2011 / TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ODDANCHATRAM 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAKL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE IDAYKOTTAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. D.VENKATESH Advocate SR.No.35901 rl/6c – 19.10.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13190 of 2011 Date :18/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/