THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20615 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioner was issued a notice dated 20.09.2007 by the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, respondents 1 and 2 herein, alleging that the petitioner had encroached the public road and constructed a compound wall apart from laying shabad stone flooring. The petitioner submitted reply dated 26.09.2007 denying the allegations. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the said reply the respondents are trying to demolish his premises. Heard Sri Vijay B. Paropkari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R. Radhakrishna Reddy, learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2. The petitioner asserts that he did not encroach into any portion of the public road. There is serious doubt and uncertainty as regards the area purchased by the mother of the petitioner and the one gifted to him by his mother. Instead of placing relevant records such as the copy of sale deed, sanction plan etc., the petitioner is insisting on the respondents to prove their case. Such an approach cannot be countenanced. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to file a suit to establish his right over the portion said to have been encroached by him. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ (L. Narasimha Reddy, J.) 4th November, 2009 Js.