BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Monday, the Twenty Eighth day of March Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.S.RAMANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.4114 of 2011 SENTHILKUMARAN :PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHINNALAPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. CR NO. 39/2011. :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.MEENAKSHI SUNDARAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.L.MURUGAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.01.2011 for the alleged offence under section 174 Cr.P.C. altered into under section 304(b) I.P.C., in Crime No. 39 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the deceased was committed suicide and a case was registered under section 174 Cr.P.C. and later at the instigation of the father of the deceased, the case was altered into section 304 (b) I.P.C. as if the petitioner demanded the dowry and as a result of that the deceased committed suicide. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that due to the dowry harassment, the deceased committed suicide. He further submitted that the RDO also conducted enquiry and it is seen from the report of RDO that the petitioner scolded the deceased and the deceased was harassed by the petitioner to gt jewels from her parents house and therefore, the deceased committed suicide. 4.Considering the fact that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 28.01.2011 and marriage took place three years prior to the occurrence and except the scolding of the deceased by the petitioner, there is no immediate threat by the petitioner to the deceased, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No:III, Dindigul and on further conditiont hat the petitioner shall stay at Trichy and appear before the Trichy Cantonment Police Station, daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of two weeks. sd/- 28/03/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate No:III, Dindigul. 2.-Do- Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police,Chinnalapatti Police Station,Dindigul District 5.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Madurai. 6.The Officer In-charge, Trichy Cantonment Police Station, Trichy. +1CC to M/S. R.MEENAKSHI SUNDARAM Advocate SR.No.8224. RP/31.03.2011/1P/8C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.4114 of 2011,Date:28/03/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/