CWEKL m THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G. w.P'.n7m. 2657' 0% 2002 ) years. Retireé &ofessor af Ghanistry. resident 0f House Ne.1. HIG~1, Sectar 3. Pandit Din Dayal, Upaéhyay Nagar nanganiamaipur, T&h511 arm District Raipur (CG). @T IT IGNER I m.“ /mhe state af amattisgarh I! y Department af Eighar Through the Sect-etar E&ucatian, Mantralay Elbe State 0f mahya Pradash; -mmugh the Sect-eta; . D.K.S.Building, Raiyur. @ucatian , mntral ay. y Dapartment @f Higher ,Vallabh Bhawan,‘ BHOPAL Panait Ravi Shanker shukla University. ,Through its Registrar, Raipur, Tdasila and District Raipur (CG). i3$mimmw$ yum PETITIcN UNDER ARTICLEs 226/227 OF mw . “ag THE E§$T1TUTIQW OF mD'IA“: / ‘ W - _ J LGUL’ u}? m. z—éol/ mmmgm ............... .................VQ....V211200 mamm manéaim. ‘ " mmaaaméa 911.2005 mmee‘arm ”aiwmst ‘ iv the petitioner submits that the petitioner has tiled a rep sentation on 30.2.2002 (Annexure P/ 10) which has not b submits that the: representation; raising 111' concerned and prays that consider and decide the re resentation of the petitioner. Learned counsel ap eam'ng for the. respondents No. 1 and 3 have no Objection to In View of the forego' g, this petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitione to tile a representation raising his gn'evances to‘ the concerne respondents within a period of 15 days from today and the r spondents are directed to consider and decide the i‘epresenta on, if any, in accordance with law, within a periodof two mo ths from the date of receipt of the i‘epreseiltation. . Guru, Advocate. Petitioner. by Shri B. ‘ Respondegt No.1‘ b Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Pancl lawyer. None for the Respon ent No.2, Respondent No.3 by hn' C. R. Sahu, Advocate. v Learned counsel f0 a fresh grievances to the respondents e respondents may be directed to above prayer. e Certified copy, as pei Rules. SP/FSI2005 - 20,000 tsé Q< mam (W) v n decided till date. He further peti 'oner Wants to file