1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION GUARDIANSHIP PETITION NO.84 OF 2005 Huvana Bharmanna Waghmare. ..Petitioner. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : AUGUST 17, 2005. DATE : AUGUST 17, 2005. DATE : AUGUST 17, 2005. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for the petitioner. Concerned persons have been duly served, as is mentioned in the affidavit of service tendered across the bar, which is taken on record. 2. The petition is by maternal grandfather of the minors. Both the mother and father of the minors have expired. In paragraph-7, list of persons stated to be heirs and next of kin of the deceased have been mentioned. All these person have given no objection for petitioner being appointed as guardian of the minors. As mentioned earlier, inspite of notice, no objection has been received; as the petitioner is maternal grandfather of the minors and minors are presently under the care of the petitioner, taking over all view of the matter and in the interest of minors, petition is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b) and (c). Liberty to apply.