IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revison No.7725 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision:28.01.2010. Manoj Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Smt Anita Sharma …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. R.S.Mamli, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The plea raised by the petitioner herein for disposal of the petition on the basis of a compromise was declined by the learned Trial Court by observing that “the petitioner having himself failed to honour the terms of the compromise cannot now seek its enforcement against the respondent.” The learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to argue that there is any factual inaccuracy in the observation made by the learned Trial Court. He is also not in a position to invite my attention to any law which would enable a party, which refrains from performing its own part of the compromise, to compel the other party to implement that compromise. The petition is held to be devoid of merits and ordered to be dismissed in limine. However, in response to a verbal presentation made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is ordered that the learned Trial Court shall dispose of the petition itself within 6 months from the next date of hearing. January 28, 2010 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE