IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.19112 of 2010 PRAMOD MAHTO son of Shri Ram Pyare Mahto Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 01.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 302 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code, in which 40-50 unknown persons are also accused. Learned counsel submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He further submits that one Anil Paswan similarly situated has already been granted bail by a bench of this Court vide order dated 13.04.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 11188 of 2010. In the circumstances, petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Konch P.S. case no. 96 of 2008 with the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge - 2 - and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)