IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2009 / 5TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 13343 of 2009(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- V.FATHIMA, CHALATH HOUSE, THIRUVANGOOR P.O., KOYILANDI. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT: --------------- THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER/ THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VADAGARA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C).No.13343 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 26th day of May, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner, a regular stage carriage operator, operating on the route Kozhikode-Vadakara, moved the respondent herein for reducing the waiting time at Kuttiadi. When the said request was rejected, she moved the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, which was disposed of under Ext.P1. The operative portion of the order reads as follows: “In the result, this petition is allowed to the extent of remanding the matter to the second respondent to consider the feasibility of reducing the waiting time in respect of the service of the petitioner, which reaches Kuttiyadi at 6.42 p.m.” 2. The order has been produced before the respondent. But nevertheless, further steps are not taken pursuant to Ext.P1. Hence this writ petition. 3. Having heard learned Government Pleader also, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to take W.P.(C).No.13343 of 2009 :: 2 :: further steps pursuant to Ext.P1 for reducing the waiting time of the stage carriage. Orders in this regard may be passed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. A copy of this judgment shall be produced by the petitioner along with a copy of the writ petition before the 1st respondent for compliance. Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge