-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 203 OF 2011 Genba Shankar Jagtap. ...Petitioner. Versus Dhondiba Shankar Jagtap deceased through L.Rs. & ors. . ..Respondents. Mr. S. P. Thorat the petitioner. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : July 8, 2011. P. C. : 1. The petitioner is seeking actions under the Contempt of Court Act against the respondents for willful and deliberate breach of the order dated 10th December 1991 passed by the 5th Additional District Judge, Pune in Regular Civil appeal No. 346 of 1990. 2. By the said order, deceased respondent no.1 and respondent no.2 were restrained permanently from interfering with the possession and vahiwat of the plaintiff over 4 anna share in Gat Nos. 1354 of 1357. It is the contention of the petitioner that the cause of action, ie., injunction being continuous, the present contempt petition is within limitation. srp -: 2 :- 3. It is not disputed that the petitioner has alternative remedy to execute the aforesaid order of the Additional District Judge . In fact, the petitioner has filed execution petition being Darkhast No. 15/2007 before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Saswad. In these circumstances, the contempt petition is not maintainable and same is therefore dismissed. 4. Looking into facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Saswad is directed to dispose of the aforesaid Darkhast filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. (Ranjit More, J.)