IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2009 / 30TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 503 of 2009(I) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER : -------------------------- E.V.AJITHA, MADATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE NADATHARA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENTS : -------------------------- 1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR 2. SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHOREITY THRISSUR BY SMT. SUDHADEVI, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ----------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 503 of 2009 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Grievance of the petitioner is regarding the non consideration of Exhibits P2, P4 and P5. By Exhibit P2, the petitioner sought renewal of regular permit in respect of the vehicle bearing registration no. KL- 3F 1798, by Exhibit P4, he sought replacement and by Exhibit P5, he sought a temporary permit under Section 87(1)(d) of the Motor Vehicles Act in the place of SC KL-8/K. 5515. If as stated, the aforesaid applications are pending, the first respondent shall consider Exhibit P2 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of copy of this judgment. It is also directed that in the meanwhile second respondent shall consider Exhibits P4 and P5, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm