IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2158 OF 2009 Motimahal Mahila Bachat Gat ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Mukesh v. Aiya for the Petitioner Mr. Anjali Helekar AGP for the Respondents CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE: 12th November , 2009 P.C. : 1. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that against the impugned order dated 21st October 2009 passed by Deputy Controller of Rationing, E/Region (Second Respondent), a Revision would lie before the State Government under clause 30 of the Maharashtra Food Grain Rationing (Second) Regulation 1966. In view of the availability of an alternate remedy by way of Revision, it would not be appropriate to entertain a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. 2. In order to enable the Petitioner to apply for interlocutory relief before the State Government, the order passed on 30.10.2009, by the Learned Vacation Judge shall continue to remain in operation for four weeks from today. 3. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. 4. The Petitioner would be at liberty to take inspection of the file and to obtain copies of the documents on which reliance has been placed in passing the impugned order, subject to the payment of usual charges. (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J)