IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5856 of 2009 BISHUNDEO YADAV Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 19.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that some of the accused persons faced trial and were convicted even by the Trial Court but in appeal they were acquitted, finding the evidence collected insufficient, petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., rather named by co-accused. In view of the discussion, as above, petitioner’s incarceration is not justified. Let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-2, Banka in connection with S.T. no. 1284 of 2008 arising out of Chandan (Anandpur) P.S. Case no. 82 of 2005. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)