1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R Shanker Lal Vs. Smt. Manki & Anr. S.B.CR. MISC. PETITION NO.68/2007 DATE OF ORDER :: July 13, 2007 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr.Vishal Saraswat, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. BY THE COURT: On an application under section 125 Cr.P.C. filed by respondent No.1, who is legally wedded wife of the petitioner, learned Judicial Magistrate, Simbalwara (for short `the trial court' hereinafter) vide order dt. 22.8.2005, granted monthly allowance of maintenance in favour of respondent No.1 and against the petitioner at the rate of Rs.500/- per month. Aggrieved by the order of the trial court, the petitioner preferred a revision petition before the learned Sessions Judge, Dungarpur (for short `the revisional court' hereinafter). On reconsideration of the record, the revisional court did not find any error in 2 granting monthly allowance of maintenance that too at the rate of Rs.500/- per month, which is a meager amount. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at length. Carefully gone through the orders passed by both the courts below. In my view, the orders impugned do not suffer from any error, illegality or perversity warranting interference in inherent jurisdiction. A sum of Rs.500/- is hardly an amount to maintain an adult person keeping in view the market inflation. Consequently, the petition fails and is, hereby dismissed. [H.R.PANWAR],J. m.asif/-