IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.13509 of 2011 Date of Decision : July 29, 2011. Swaran Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Harish Nain, Advocate, for Mr.Mohd.Yousaf, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The partition proceedings initiated by the petitioner have culminated into the impugned orders dated 6.10.2008 (Annexure P-1), 24.5.2010 (Annexure P-3) and 20.5.2011 (Annexure P-4) passed by respondent Nos.4, 3 & 2, respectively. The authorities have concurrently held that the parties were in physical possession as per their respective shares and that it is a fit case to protect the possession while partitioning the joint holding. The petitioner's plea that since the subject land adjoining the road is 107 karams, that he should be given 53½ karams abutting the road, has not found favour with the authorities for the reason that the private respondents own another CWP No.13509 of 2011 [2] chunk of land behind the land in their possession out of the joint holding. With a view to avoid fragmentation of their holding that the mode of partition has been prepared and concurrently approved by the higher authorities. Since the mode of partition is based upon a well known method of partition, no interference by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction is called for. However, the impugned orders have no bearing on the proceedings statedly pending between the parties before the civil court. With the above observations, the writ petition stands dismissed. July 29 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE