IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD JANUARY 2007 / 13TH POUSHA, 1928 WP(C).No. 322 of 2007(L) ------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------ A.H. JASEER, S/O.HAMSA, ALINKUTTATHIL HOUSE, P.O.NAGARIPURAM, PATHIRIPALA, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.H.BADARUDDIN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1.MANNOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PALAKKAD TALUK. 2.C.M. ALI, CHOLAKKAL HOUSE, PERUR P.O., (VIA) PATHARIPALA, PALAKKAD TALUK. 3. THE TOWN PLANNER, PALAKKAD. R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.MATHEW G.VADAKKEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 322 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 3rd January, 2007 JUDGMENT I do not propose to consider the merits of the matter. But Ext.P2 representation has been submitted by the petitioner complaining that the 2nd respondent is going ahead with certain illegal constructions which is causing hardship to the petitioner. Since Ext.P2 is pending before the 1st respondent, it is only proper that the 1st respondent takes a decision on Ext.P2 at the earliest. Accordingly, this Writ Petition will stand disposed of in the following terms: The 1st respondent will take up Ext.P2 immediately, hear the 2nd respondent as well as the petitioner and dispose of Ext.P2 in accordance with law at the earliest and at any rate within one month of receiving copy of this judgment. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE