IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32887 of 2010 MRITUNJAY KUMAR RAI @ MRITUNJAY RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 06.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner, Mritunjay Kumar Rai @ Mritunjay Rai seeks bail in connection with Agiaon (Garhani) P.S. Case No. 97 of 2009 registered under section 307 & other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code as well as section 27 of the Arms Act. The specific allegation against the petitioner is that he opened fire on informant as a result of which, the informant sustained fire-arm injury on his right hand. The impugned order of learned Sessions Judge reveals that the informant has received grievous injury and furthermore, the antecedent of the petitioner sent by Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur reveals that this petitioner carries criminal antecedent of eight cases. Although Learned counsel for the petitioner tried to convince me by referring the further statement of the informant as well as by pointing out minor contradiction in further statement of the informant, but I am not at all convinced with his submission. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, 2 Mritunjay Kumar Rai @ Mritunjay Rai in connection with above-said Agiaon ( Garhani) P.S. Case No. 97 of 2009 stands rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of the charge. It appears from the record that uptill now, the case of the petitioner has not been committed to the court of sessions. Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur is directed to commit the case of the petitioner to the court of sessions if the case has not been committed as yet. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)