IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2533 of 2006 1. BIHAR STATE LIVESTOCK SUPERVISORS’ ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY RAJENDRA PRASAD YADAV, SON OF LATE ANAND MOHAN YADAV, RESIDENT OF KOTHIA KURJI, P.S.-DIGHA, DISTRICT-PATNA. 2. MOHD. ANWAR IQBAL KHAN, SON OF DR. M.N.YUSUFI, RESIDENT OF KANKARBAGH P.C. COLONY, P.S.-KANKARBAGH, DISTRICT-PATNA. 3. SAROJ KUMAR, SON OF LATE JAMUNA PRASAD YADAV, RESIDENT OF PRANPUR, P.S.-MUFFASIL, AKOULA, DISTRICT- NAWADAH. …………………PETITIONERS. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, SHRI AMIR SUBHANI, ANIMAL HUSBANDARY & FISHERIES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2. SHRI AMIR SUBHANI, FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, SECRETARY, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY & FISHERIES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. SHRI NAVIN KUMAR, FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, FINANCE SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 4. DR. HARIBANSH NARAIN, FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, DIRECTOR, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY & FISHERIES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. ………………OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 4 02.12.2008 This contempt application has been filed for alleged violation of order of this Court dated 24.7.2006 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 8981 of 2004.By the said order, this Court has directed for consideration of claims of the petitioners on the footing that they had the qualification of Intermediate with 15 months training. Pursuant to the directions of this Court, the case of Live Stock Supervisors in Government service has been considered by the Finance Department and a reasoned order has 2 been passed, annexed as Annexure-A to the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no. 3. The order contains reasons for rejecting the claim of the petitioners association for grant of particular scale to the Live Stock Supervisors. In view of the consideration of the case of Live Stock Supervisors by a reasoned order in compliance to the orders of this Court passed in the writ matter, this Court does not consider it proper to examine the correctness of the order and reasons assigned therein by the opposite parties in rejecting the claim. The petitioners association or any other Live Stock Supervisor shall be at liberty to challenge the said order of the Finance Department in an appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. With above observations, this contempt application is disposed of. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh , J. )