1 wp9779.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9779 OF 2010 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. A.M. Gholap, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. L.B. Palod, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 3rd MAY, 2011 Heard. Trial Court has only framed the preliminary issue. Advocate Mr. Gholap contends that that issue could not have been framed as written statement is still not filed. In other words, contention that without filing written statement such objection to jurisdiction could not have been raised. 2. Advocate Mr. Palod for respondent nos. 1 and 2 supports the impugned order. 3. Law on the point is well settled. Objection to jurisdiction can be raised even without filing written statement. Hence without observing anything more, the 2 wp9779.10 present Petition is disposed of. No costs. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE gas/wp9779.10