INJ'HE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^ ^-et.'^ ._._-_ ^,,^ Contempt Be-^en(Q N0. 3^5 /2011 ®ngl8Beacl PETITIONERS: ^•^ !"^y'' ^'\~^"' .^ 'Vs ..•'''-^y'''' ^C .^ ^%^ ^^y 2) ^y./••"°!/ 1) Santosh Kuroar Sahu S/o Shri Lila Rgffl Sahu, aged abaut years, R/o Kabir Chowk, ward No.14, Nagar Panchayat Tumgaon, Distnct Mahasaniund (C.G.) Govind Ninnalkar S/o Late Gangu raia Nirmalkar, aged about 37 years, R/o ward No. 11, Ngggr Pgashayat Tumgaon, Dlstrict Mahasamuiid (C.G.) 3) Domar Yadav S/o Motiraca Yadav, aged about 28 years, R/o ward NoJl, Naggr Pasehayat Tum.gaon, Dlstrict Mahasamund (C.G.) 4) Purshottam Nirmatkar S/o ^hiv Nargyan Nirmglkar, aged about 22 years, R/o ward No.ll, Near Post Office, Nagar Panchayat Tumgaon District Mahasamund (C.G.) i) Rajesh Kumar Dubey S/o Shri Kulesh-wrar Dubey, aged about 40 years, R/o Akta Chowk Mahasamund Dist Mahasamund (C.Q.) 'h- 6) Dinesh Kumar Patkar S/o Shri Riyu Ld Pa&ar, aged abeut years, R/o Police Luie Mahasamund Distt Mahasaniund (C.G.) 7) KgBfVi Ki^iaa S/Q ghri Chteau Kishaa, aged about 25f years, < ~ <}- R/o Nayapara, Mahasamund District Mahasamund (C.G.) ilffi VERSUS RESPONDENT CONTEMNOR ;am, aged\^bout 47Nxears, R/) Para, Lund (C.G.) w^d No.7, \ Brahman'" Tumg'&pn, Distnct Mahas Rajendra F>rasad Sharma Chief Municipal Of&cer.Tumgaon Mah&saaund (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDE^R ARTICLE^IS OF THE 'CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT % 'TST -^ww^, ®xi1<y'ifi,f^dKH^ i^(,c)vu?-^3/?/ "WI, 200 sn^! ~!f^v c^^^fi) sn^ivi R-fi'* ?T81T 3?H^T **^ Deepli SB : Hon'bte Shri Manindra Mohail 2C<94011 Smt. M. fistia, counsei for the Meard. The petitioners in this petitior| disposed off on 11/3/201 1. Arismg 6/9/2011. This petition therefore, absence of ttiere being any avermej chl<li(ri<<i^t *lHdl'^f f^yl <.F>i^I<. '^ajfim 3ii^i Shrivastava. J. petitioners. are the writ petitioners in W.P.(S) No.326/11 out of the same case, one of the petitioners - Pappu Kumar Patet fiied contemplt petition which has been disposed off on cannot be entertained at thte stage in the it with regard to the status of the writ appeal. The petition is accordingly disposed joff. The petiUoners wouid be alj eventualitv arises. iiberty to revive this petition as and when Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ••nn'fl'i^^igswBw.ui'ri ••'•iq—!'s/i40—2/2011—i,so,ooo. !E!