^ i'- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Writ Petition No.2087 of 2006 PETITIONER Ramanuj Agrawal, 61 years, son of Late Shri Madanlal Agrawal, R/o Ward No.20, Manendragarh, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Versys RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretary of Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Manendragarh, Distt. korea (C.G.) 3. Dy. Director, Town and Country Planning, Korba, Distt. Korba (C.G.) Writ Petition Under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India Present: Dr NK Shukla, Senior Advocate with Shri Dileep Dubey, counsei for the petitioner. Shri NK Agrawal, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORDER ith (28m February, 2008) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Learned counsel for the parties are heard on admission. 2) The petitioner Ramanuj Agrawal claiming himself to be a public oriented person has filed this writ petition styled as Pubiic Interest Litigation for the following reliefs : BsgB'-asasrai^s.^.ieM.iafaaa.i t 7.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records relating to construction of rooms in the middle of the play ground, for its kind perusat. 7.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to restraint construction of rooms in the middle of the play ground in the interest of justice and further be pleased to direct restoration of play ground. 7.3 Any other relief which this Hon'ble court may deem frt in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3) The petitioner, thus, in substance is seeking a direction to the respondents restraining them from the construction of rooms in the mtddle of the play-ground and restoration of the play-ground in its original shape. 4) Learned Deputy Advocate General for the State, on the basis of communication received from the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Manindragarh submitted that the construction of the rooms has already been compteted and these class rooms are being used by the School since the academic session 2007-2008. 5) In our opinion, if the authorlties found it necessary to construct more rooms to accommodate sufficient number of students, no fault can be found in the decision taken by the authorities for the construction of additional class rooms for the existing school by taking part ofthe play-ground. 6) The writ petition, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. 7) The security amount of Rs.5,000/- deposited by the petitioner be refunded to him. Sd/- CMef Justice Sd/- SunilKumarSuiha Judge