Aopllcant. Resoondents HIGH COUKTOF CHHATTISQARH: BILASPUR Writ Pefltison 1 No. 3324 of 2005 Ku. Suprabha Das, D/o. Late N.L. Das, aged about 69 years, Retd. Asstt, Professor, Govt. Coitege of Education, Bilaspur, r/o. Aprajeet Smriti Van, Rajkishore Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil & Distt. Bilaspur (^4R5. Versus 1) The Stafe of Chhattisgarh, through Principa! Seoretary, Higher Education Departmert, Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(CG). 2) Director of Higher Education : of Ghhattisgaiti, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 3) Principal Govt. College of Education Bilaspur. 4) Chief Accounts Officer, KPension Deptfc), Directorate of Public Instructlon Chhattisgarti, Raipur. 5) Director State Education Researeh and Training Institute, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. 6) Joint Director, Treasury & Accounts, Bilaspur. (Application under Seotion 19 ofthe Administratlve Tribunals Act, 1985) SB: Hon'bteMr. Satish K.Agnlhotri.J. Present: Shri RamKumar Tiwari, counsel forthe petitioner. ; Shri A.Si Kachhawaha, DeputyAdvocateGeneral with Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passedon 2081February, 20W) (1) By this petition, the petitipnere, who is a daughter ofthe deceased N. L. Das, is ciaiming retirai benefits. (2) Learned counsel appearing forthe petltioner submit that on 19.06.2006 in - W.P. No. 1961S006 (Smt. Keia Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Govemmehtof Chhatti^arh and others), thisCourtpassedthefollowing.order: ! ".....In tum, the A.G. Office is gettlng incorrect information and not abte to give authority letter at the-time of retirement of an ernployee,| therefbre, aoommitteeconsistingeflQllowing officersisConaltuted; i '\."~ IRSju (1) SpecialSeoretary(Finance),(ChalnT]an5, (2) Any officer of the rank of Additional Seoretary of Law Department, (Member), (3) Director, Treasury, Aocounts and Pension, (Member), (4) DepuSyAccountantGeneral(Funds),(Member), (5) Joint Secretary (General Administration Department, State of Chhattisgarh), (Member eum Secretary)" (3) Learned oounsel appearing forthe State submits that pursuant to the above order a Committee, consisting of the above-stated orfieers has been ?- -- - ' constituted to look into the grievances ofthe retired employees, in respect of retiral dues. (4) In this petition, the disputed question of facts with regard to the retirai dues (supra) are involved, which cannot be decided by fhis Court, as the disputed questions of facts can be resoived by the high power committee (supra) in consultation with the retired employee and the ooncemed offioere. Thus, 1 am / of the consldered opinion that it would be just and expedient to direct the above Committee, so constituted, to look into the disputes and pass appropriate orders, in acoordancewith law. (5) Accordingly, the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a perjod of 15 days from tiie date of receipt of a oopy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall .issue notiee to the aggrieved retired empioyee and the officers ooncerned, wiihin a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in aocordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the employee. The employee concemed and the ofRcers concerned may file additional documents,: if necessary, The entire exereise, including paymert of retirat dues (supra), if any, to the petitioner, be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (6) Extra copy of the petition will be supplied to learned counsel appearing for " the State for onward transmissiontotheCommittee. (7) In viewofthefbtegolng, thepetition isdisposed of. Noorderastocosts. | Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^i'- •i Ij i): i^