1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANTABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2298 OF 2009 1. Ramdas s/o Ganesh Chavan, age 58 yrs, Occ. nil, r/o Sonal Nagar, Railway Station, Road, Jalna. 2. Ashabai w/o Ramdas Chavan, age 50 yrs, Occ. Household, r/o Sonal Nagar, Railway Station road, Jalna. 3. Jyoti w/o Rajendra Chavan, age 35 yrs, occ. Household, r/o Jadhav Building, Railway Station road, Chalisgaon, Tq. Chalisgaon, Dist. Jalna. 4. Shubham s/o Rajendra Jadhav, age 18 yrs, occ. Education, r/o Jadhav building, Railway Station road, Chalisgaon, Tq. Chalisgaon, Dist Jalgaon. 5. Varsha w/o Suresh Gaikwad, age 25 yrs, occ. Household, r/o Jamunanagar, Railway Station road, Jalna. 6. Rajesh s/o Ramdas Chavan, age 28 yrs, occ. Labour, r/o Sonal Nagar, Railway Station road, Jalna. Applicants. V E R S U S 2 1. The State of Maharashtra through the police station, Kadim Jalna, Tq. & Dist. Jalna. 2. Rekha d/o Satyanarayan Shinde, age 22 yrs, occ. Household, r/o Nathaba Galli, Hamalpura, Jalna. Respondents. Shri J.M.Murkute, adv. for applicant. Smt. B.R.Khekale, APP for respondent -1 CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2009. PER COURT :- 1. Heard Mr.J.M. Murkute, for accused/applicant and Ld. APP. Wife-complainant though served absent. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. 2. Registration of offence vide crime No.45/2009 under section 498A, 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act is assailed. 3. During the course of submission the counsel canvassed the status of husband with the victim complainant itself is a big question mark. According to him, there is no role by married sisters or the nephew (son of sister). They are falsely implicated. 4. Matter is taken up in terms of Section 482 Cr.P.C. The parameters indicated in judgment in the matter of State of Punjab V/s Bhajanlal reported in AIR 1992 S.C. 604 for its major role to be looked into. It is 3 obvious FIR independently disclose and magnify role of the each of the accused in harassing the victim for compliance of Rs.20,000/-. It may be that the allegations are false however this is not stage to contribute for such allegations to be false. The discretion and extra ordinary power in terms of 482 Cr.P.C. needs to be sparingly used. It does not project an occasion in the instant case to use. Consequently no merits in the matter. Rule discharged. Application rejected. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. ) **** aaa/2298.09