: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1309 OF 2005 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1309 OF 2005 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1309 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2044 OF 2005 SUMMARY SUIT NO.2044 OF 2005 SUMMARY SUIT NO.2044 OF 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders. order or directions and Registrar’s orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Manoj Kathe i/b Ajay Miser & Co. for the Plaintiffs. Mr.Sanskar Marathe i/b.Deven Dwarkadas & Partners for the Defendant. CORAM : SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. CORAM : SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 29TH NOVEMBER 2005 DATED : 29TH NOVEMBER 2005 DATED : 29TH NOVEMBER 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . This Chamber Summons has been filed by the Defendants for condoning the delay of ten days in filing the Vakalatnama. The reason stated in the affidavit is that due to the torrential rains in Mumbai as well as Secunderabad where the Defendants have their office, it was not possible to file the Vakalatnama in time. 2. Although the Chamber Summons is : 2 : opposed by the learned Advocate for the Plaintiffs by stating that the reasons given in the affidavit in support is not genuine, in my opinion, this is a fit case where the Chamber Summons should be allowed. 3. Chamber Summons allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).