Regular Second Appeal No. 3106 of 2006 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No. 3106 of 2006 Date of Decision: September 02, 2009 Karam Singh and others ......... Appellants versus Mukhtiar Singh and others .......... Respondents Present:- Shri Tejinder Pal Singh, Advocate for Shri R.K. Girdhar, Advocate for the appellants. Shri I.S. Mann, Advocate for the respondents HEMANT GUPTA, J. The plaintiffs are in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Courts below whereby suit for possession of suit land measuring 9 Kanals 3 Marlas was dismissed. The plaintiffs have claimed possession of the aforesaid land on the basis of inheritance as legal heirs of Dharam Singh. However, in evidence, the plaintiffs produced sale deed dated 22.2.1977, Exhibit P-1. The Courts below have held that the evidence led by the plaintiffs is contrary to the pleadings raised and that the plaintiffs have failed to prove their title in the suit property, therefore, the plaintiffs are not entitled to the possession thereof. Apart from the contradictory evidence than the pleadings raised, even the sale deed is not proved. A photo copy of the sale deed has been produced and it does not relate to the entire land. In the absence of the Regular Second Appeal No. 3106 of 2006 [2] evidence of title, the claim of the appellants has been rightly negated. Therefore, the findings recorded by the learned Courts below cannot be said to be suffering from any patent illegality or material irregularity. In view of the above, I do not find that any substantial question of law arises for determination by this Court in second appeal. Dismissed. September 02, 2009 ( HEMANT GUPTA ) ks JUDGE