IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1853 of 2007 Jai Govind Singh, son of late Ram Dahin Singh, resident of village- Sanjhsuli, P.O. & P.S. Sanjhauli. District- Rohtas. ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Collector, Rohtas Sasaram. 3. Dy. Collector Land Reforms, Bikramganj, Rohtas. 4. Anchal Adhikari, Bikramganj, Sasaram. 5. Jai Ram Singh, son of Late Ram Dahin Singh 6. Kamal Kishore Singh, son of Late Kaushal Kishore Singh. 7. Ram Jag Singh, son of late Ram Dahin Singh. 8. Ramesh Kumar Singh, son of late Ishwar Dayal Singh. 9. Mostt. Raj Kalo Devi, wife of late Ishwar Dayal Singh. Respondent nos.5 to 9 all resident of village- Sanjhauli, P.O. & P.S. Sanjhauli, District- Rohtas. ....Respondents. ----------- 02- 13.1.2009 Heard Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad for the petitioner, and Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.1, learned Government Pleader No.14 for respondent nos.1 to 4. I do not feel the necessity of issuing notices to respondent nos.5 to 9 in view of the nature of the order that I am going to pass. 2. It is directed against the order dated 2.12.2006 (Annexure-5), passed by the learned Collector of the district of Rohtas (Sasaram) in Mutation Revision Case No.57 of 2 2001 (Jairam Singh Vs. Jai Govind Singh and others), whereby orders have been passed for mutation of the land in question in favour of respondent nos.5 to 9 herein. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties are already locked in a title suit instituted by the present petitioner for adjudication of his right, title, and interest. 3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as not pressed. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/