1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. APPEAL NO.86 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.32 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.3519 OF 2005 Mr.Prasad T. Lad ..Appellant v/s. Pravin Viram Satra and others. .. Respondents Mr.Anand Grover with Mr.P.L.Mahadik i/by Mr.P.L.Mahadik for the appellant. Mr.E.P.Bharucha, Senior Counsel with Mr.Kevic Setalwad and Mr.Dhiren Shah i/by M/s.Vimla & Co. for the respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. DATED : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2006. P.C. Admit. 2. The advocate on record for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 waives service. 3. By consent, service on respondent No.3 is waived. Appeal is heard finally. 4. After having heard the learned senior counsel and the counsel for the parties for some time, we indicated that matter requires reconsideration by 2 the learned motion Judge. 5. The learned senior counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 and the learned counsel for the appellant agreed to the said course. 6. In what we have said above, we do not deal with the appeal further. The impugned order is set aside. 7. The notice of motion No.32 of 2006 is restored for reconsideration by the learned motion Judge in accordance with law. 8. The parties shall be at liberty to place on record the compilation of documents if they so desire to do. We request the learned motion Judge to decide the notice of motion expeditiously. No costs. (R.M.LODHA, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)