IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4473/2009 Date of decision:10.1.2011. Fazru and another .............Petitioners v Ishaq and others ..............Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.Sudhir Aggarwal,Advocate for the petitioners. Jaswant Singh,J. Defendants/petitioners are aggrieved against the orders dated 31.3.2005 and 15.5.2009 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr.Div.) Ferozepur Jhirka and ADJ,Gurgaon respectively, whereby their application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, for setting aside the ex parte judgment and decree dated 19.5.1994, was dismissed. At the time of issuance of notice of motion, it was inter alia argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they had never refused to accept the service and no proclamation was at all effected at the spot. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and gone through the impugned orders. Both the Courts below, on the basis of evidence led by the parties have recorded finding of fact that from perusal of summons Ex.R1 and R2, defendants/petitioners were found present by the Process Server and they refused to receive the summons. It was further found by the Courts below that as per certified copy of summon Ex.R3, Bashir son of Jor Mal avoided the service of summons and the summons were affixed on his house. Thereafter, the munadi was also effected in the presence of witness Samsu, whose signatures were obtained on summons Ex.-R4 alongwith signatures of the Munadi Karta. In view of the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the courts below, I find no illegality or perversity in the impugned ordes which may call for interference by this Court in the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Dismissed. 10.1.2011. (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge