- 1 - 30.sj.42.11 ss.2993.10 skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 42 OF 2011 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2993 OF 2010 Jamnadas Mathardas ..Plaintiff -Versus- Narinderpal Singh Kohli & Ors. ..Defendants .......... Mr. Amar M. Talreja i/b Amar M. Talreja/Anand A. Talreja for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants. .......... CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 17TH DECEMBER 2011. P.C. 1 The suit is based on the demand bill of exchange drawn by defendant no.1 in favour of the plaintiff and accepted by defendant no.2. Defendant no.3 is the drawee in case of need. Notice of dishonour was waived. The cheque issued by defendant no.1 towards repayment was dishonoured. There was no reply to the plaintiff’s advocates’ notice dated 6th July 2010 demanding payment. 2 There is nothing on record that militates against the plaintiff’s claim in suit. This is a fit case to accept the submissions and averments in the plaint. - 2 - 30.sj.42.11 ss.2993.10 3 In the circumstances, Summons for Judgment is made absolute and the Summary Suit is decreed as prayed. However, interest after the date of filing of the suit shall be at the rate of 12% p.a. Costs to be quantified as per rules. Refund, if any, as per rules. -