IN THE HIGH COURTOF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. FAO No.629 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.4.2011 Gomati and others ...Appellant(s) vs Surender Singh and others ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG. --- Present: None for the appellants. -- Rakesh Kumar Garg, ,J.(Oral) The claimants who are widow and sons of Rajinder deceased have approached this Court by challenging the impugned award on the ground of inadequacy of the compensation granted to them on account of his death, who has died in a motor vehicle accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of offending vehicle being driven by respondents No. 1 and 4. As per the post mortem report, at the time of accident age of Rajinder deceased was 45 years. The appellants did not produce any documentary evidence regarding income of the deceased. However, in the testimony of PW1 Mainpal income of the deceased is shown as Rs.3300/- per month and the Tribunal assessed the income of the deceased at Rs.3000/- per month and applied a cut off 1/3rd on the same, and thereafter applied multiplier of 13. A sum of Rs.5000/- were granted towards expenses etc. and thus appellants were held entitled to a sum of Rs.3,17,000/- in total. Learned counsel for the appellants fails to point out any material evidence available on record has been ignored by the learned Tribunal while determining the compensation of the deceased. Thus, no error can be found in the impugned award. Dismissed. ( Rakesh Kumar Garg) Judge April 26, 2011 rk