1 Cri.Appln.320 of 2011 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 320 OF 2011 Vishwanath Namdeo Thakur ... Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Ms. Anamika A. Motale i/by Mr. S.V. Gavand, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. R.V. Newton, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. By this application, relaxation in the condition of bail imposed upon the applicant is urged. The applicant was directed to withdraw himself from visiting the office of CIDCO. During the course of submissions, the learned counsel submits that the officer who claimed that he was harassed and initiated prosecution, is no more in the said department as he is transferred. The applicant claims that his property is under acquisition of CIDCO and he has to attend the office every now 2 Cri.Appln.320 of 2011 and then for redressal. Accepting the submission of the learned counsel that the officer is transfered, the order below Exh. 14 passed in Sessions Case No. 75 of 2010 imposing condition is set aside. The applicant may attend office of CIDCO in connection with the his work. However, he will not invite identical situation for which he has to face the present prosecution including terrorizing the officers of CIDCO. With the above clarification, order of restriction imposed vide clause (8) in the order dated 11.3.2010 is modified. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)