IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA G. APP. (DB) No.37 of 2008 THE STATE OF BIHAR Versus BIPIN PRASAD & ORS ----------- 3/ 5-Sep-08 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the impugned judgment whereby the Respondents-accused persons have been convicted for the offence under Sections 147,323,341, and 504 of the IPC but acquitted for the offence under Section 307 IPC. On consideration of medical evidence as observed in the judgment and also the discrepancy in the earliest version given by the informant and his deposition in the court, we find that the trial court has rightly disbelieved the allegation in respect of charge under Section 307 of the IPC. We find no merit in this appeal. Leave to appeal against impugned judgment of acquittal under Section 307 IPC is therefore rejected. In view of aforesaid discussions on merit, we do not find any necessity of discussing the limitation petition filed for condonation of delay for about four months. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (S.M.Mahfooz Alam,J.)