Crl. Misc. No.M-27108 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-27108 of 2011 Date of Decision: September 7, 2011 Manoj Kumar …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and another …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.Bikram Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner is a complainant in a case registered against respondent No.2 Mannu and others under Section 498-A, 304B /34 IPC registered at Police Station Narwana, District Jind. He seeks the cancellation of the bail granted to the unmarried sister-in-law of deceased Suman, who had died on account of poison used for spray (insecticides). Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the bail has been granted on the ground that respondent No.2 has been attributed the part of only taunting for bringing insufficient dowry and that there is no allegation of demand of dowry against her. Counsel has vehemently urged that as a Crl. Misc. No.M-27108 of 2011 [2] matter of fact, there are specific allegations against respondent No.2 regarding beatings and administration of poison forcibly that too in the house of respondent No.2. It cannot be expected that she was not present when the poison was administered. I have heard counsel for the petitioner and gone through the contents of the FIR and find that the allegation against respondent No.2 in the FIR is that the complainant had suspicion that his sister Suman had been beaten and administered poison forcibly within one and half year of her marriage. No doubt, it is an unfortunate circumstance that the sister of the petitioner has died an unnatural death but at the same time the allegations in the FIR and respondent No.2 being unmarried sister-in-law of deceased, cannot be ignored. Besides this, there is no allegation as to how respondent No.2 had misused her liberty pursuant to the bail granted to her. The parameters of rejection of bail and cancellation of bail are different. I do not find any ground to cancel the orders of bail passed in favour of respondent No.2. Dismissed. September 7, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE