IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24107 of 2010 SK.SURAT S/o late Sk. Shakur Versus STATE OF BIHAR . 03/ 01.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. It is simply stated that on the alleged date of occurrence the petitioner took away the informant’s mother and subsequently dead body of the informant’s mother was found hanging on a tree. The reason behind the occurrence is said to be land dispute between the deceased and the petitioner who happens to be Gotia of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the reason of false implication is land dispute and none of the person claims to have seen the actual occurrence. Learned counsel for the State points out that during the course of investigation witnesses have stated that prior to the alleged occurrence an altercation took place between the deceased and the petitioner and subsequently the petitioner committed murder of the deceased. Admittedly, instant case is based upon circumstantial evidence and there is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence. So far as circumstantial evidence is concerned, same appears to be not convincing for consideration of bail petition of the petitioner. Accordingly, it is ordered that the petitioner be released on bail in connection with Manihari P.S. Case no. 18 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J))