IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 161 OF 2006 Shri Dashrath Krishna Atkar .... .... Petitioner V/s State of Maharashtra ..... ..... Respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Office Notes, Office ) Court's or Judge's Orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Mr.S.Sakhare, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.P.P.Kakade, AGP for respondent. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR, Ag.C.J. AND SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. 20.01.2006. PC: By this petition the petitioner has questioned the appointment of respondent NO.6 as Police Patil. The challenge put forward is that respondent No.6 though has minimum qualification prescribed under the Rules is stammering and has no 1 agricultural land and therefore the petitioner who does not have minimum qualification of matriculation and has agricultural land be given preference. This contention was negatived by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal is not in any way incorrect, illegal or without jurisdiction and therefore no interference is called for. Petition rejected. 20.1.06 2