1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.07.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.8274 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 Ameerr Batcha ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manapparai. 3.The Inspector of Police, Vyyampatti, Trichy District. 4.Kathirvelu 5.Barakath Nisha ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1,2 and 3 from conducting enquiry in respect of the civil dispute with regard to the property in S.No.39/1 of Saralapatti Kallathu Veedu, Kumarvadi village, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District which is the subject matter of the civil suit in O.S.No.32 of 2008 and O.S.No.181 of 2010 on the file of District Munsif Court, Manapparai. For Petitioner ... Mr.J.Anand Kumar For Respondents ... Mr.R.Anandharaj Govt. Advocate for R1 to R3 R4 & R5 Dispensed with ORDER The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition to forbear the respondents 1,2 and 3 from conducting enquiry in respect of the civil dispute with regard to the property in S.No.39/1 of Saralapatti Kallathu Veedu, Kumarvadi village, Manapparai Taluk, Trichy District which is the subject matter of the civil suit in O.S.No.32 of 2008 and O.S.No.181 of 2010 on the file of District Munsif Court, Manapparai. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. In view of the order to be passed, notice to the fourth respondent is dispensed with. 3. Heard Mr.J.Anand Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Anandha Raj, learned Government Advocate who takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. 4. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 5.The petitioner made a representation to the first respondent/ Superintendent of Police, Trichy, on 21.07.2011 setting out his grievance against the respondents 2 and 3 as well as the Respondents 4 and 5 private parties, stating that inspite of the civil Court proceedings pending between the parties, the police authorities are interfering with the possession of the petitioner. 6. Considering the nature of relief sought for in the writ petition, the first respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 21.07.2011 and dispose of the same, on its own merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, after hearing the respondents 4 and 5. It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion about the merits of the petitioner's claim and the Authority shall dispose the same on its own merits. 7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manapparai. 3.The Inspector of Police, Vyyampatti, Trichy District. +1cc to Mr.J.Anandkumar, Advocate Sr.No.24357 +1cc to The Special Government Pleader SR.No.24593 gsr akm/05.08.11 /2p-6c/ W.P.(MD)No.8274 of 2011 25.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/