c^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) SECOND APPEAL N0.- "-Z /2004 APPELLANTS: (Plaintiffs) <.-^-t- /^' .^y ...A7A f^f/^ N?.^'.^' ^V/--^'c>- ^/.. A'..-'' .;>-/Y <y y .."^ »<" RESPONDENTS: (Defendants) VERSUS 1. ^4. Jan Bai, widow Ghuraudas Aged 50 years, R/o. Leemgaon, Tah. & Dist. Korba (CG). 2. ShivDas, S/o. Ghuraudas, Aged 22 years, R/o. Leemgaon, Tah & Dist. Korba (CG). Lakshmin Bai, D/o. Ghuarudas, Age 25 years, R/o. Leemgaon, Tah & Dist. Korba. 4. Kirtandas S/o. Ghuraudas /•' Mahand, Aged 13 years, minor, through mother (Guardian) suit friend Jan Bai W/o.Ghuraudas, R/o. Leemgaon, Tahsil SDist. Korba(CG). 5. Teras Bai, D/o. Ghuraudas, /" Age 12 years, minor through mother natural guardian suit friend Jan Bai W/o. Ghuraudas, R/o. Leemgaon, Tahsil & Dist. Korba (CG). 6. Sahodara Bai,D/o. Ghuraudas, Aged 9 years minor through mother & natural guardian and suit friend Leemgaon, Tah. & Dist. Korba (CG) All resident Vill. Leemgaon, Tah. SDistt. Korba (CG). Ram Bai, D/o. Bundelsingh Age 48 yrs., Caste-Gond, R/o. Vill. Leemgaon, Tah & Dist: Korba (CG) 2.<,- State of Chhattisgarh through ^ The Collector Distt. Korba ^.-t. ^" IVIEMO OF SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIViL PROCEDURE 1908. rifi E- XI-HC-78 3T[^T !^T f^lNi ;PTT3n^Tsb*i ^ A^ ^ w 3^'^r[FTRPr, ^Tn^'IS, IsKtl'My j5:^.Kio, 83/ *nH^I Sb^lch W! 200 w^\ y^* (yit^si^ff) ?T(ireR:flf?(T3;n^T 26.07.2006 Shri F.S. Khare, counsel] None.for respondent No. None for respondent No.] It is stated by Shri 12.2.2004. He submHs that sh^ the trial Court. The piaintiffis' su| ultimately the firet appeal appeltate Court. His submission respondent No.1 excepl the p relations of the sote ultimately, after the death of s( reverted back to the ownership now the plaintiffs do not want tc dismissal ofthe appeal. The appeal is dismissed In view of the above, 1.^ I.A. No. 3258/2005 for out of under Section 151 of C.P.C, +l^tc1<fl^ KIKcfTft'te^diRgi ^aif^TW^T ]for the appellants. ,D. ,^/State. Kfliare that respondent No.1 has died on was the sole defendant in the suit before (t before the trial Court was dismissed and )fited by them was also dismissed by the |is that there are no legal representatives of laintiffs who are the only surviving ciose dece|ased/respondent No.1. He submits that ^le defendant, the entire property shall be |of the plaintiffs. In this view of the matter, t press this appeal any more. He prays for ^s not pressed. |. No. 2/2005 filed under order 22 Rule 4, |turn hearing and I.A. No.2362/2006 filed stajid disposed of. Sd/- Sunii Kiimar Sicha Judge P.T.O.