1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR W.P. No.1263 of 2008 (MOIL Kamagar Sanghatana c/o. Manganese Ore (I) Ltd., Nagpur vs. Union of India and Ors.) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and Mrs. Vasanti A. Naik, JJ. DATE : 03.04.2008. Heard Mr.Thakur, Adv. for the Petitioner and Mr.S.K.Mishra, Assistant Solicitor General for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. Mr.S.K.Mishra, Assistant Solicitor General for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 filed a pursis dt. 3.4.2008 on record stating that, on 25.3.2008, the respondents have issued a letter to all the unions informing them that the verification of membership of Trade Union Functioning in the establishment of M/s Manganese Ore (India) Ltd., Nagpur will be done by physical checking method and not by the secret ballot. It is, therefore, evident that, in view of the pursis dt.3.4.2008, the grievance of the petitioner union at this stage stands redressed. Hence, the Petition is disposed of accordingly. If the independent cause of action arises in future, it is 2 always open for the parties to take appropriate steps, if they are aggrieved by such cause of action, if available in law. JUDGE JUDGE ssj