IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13885 of 2010 UPENDRA CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 22-07-2010 Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 12-7- 2009 in connection with a case registered under sections 366(A) and 34 of the I.P.C. The petitioner being the married person having four children is alleged to have enticed away 17 1/2 years old daughter of the informant to whom the informant claims to be 14 years old. The victim in 164 Cr.P.C. statement has supported the prosecution case. The charge sheet has already been submitted under sections 366(A) and 376 of the I.P.C. Considering the fact that the petitioner being a married person having four children indulged in such a nature of offence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The bail petition of the petitioner is rejected. S.P. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)