IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31710 of 2008 RANI DEVI @ RENU DEVI @ RANUKA DEVI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------------ 5 11.11.2008 Heard. In course of investigation the confession of the suspect has come on record that stolen articles were sold to petitioner no.2. Petitioner no.1 happens to be the wife of petitioner no.2. She is said to be Pardanashi lady. Considering the said state of affairs and on the undertaking by petitioner no.1 that she will cooperate in the investigation, the application for grant of anticipatory bail of petitioner no.1 is allowed. Let the petitioner no.1 (Rani Devi @ Renu Devi @ Renuka Devi), in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/ - ( rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Fast Track Court No. I, Madhubani in Sessions trial no.63 of 2007 arising out of Bisfi P.S. Case no. 90 of 2006 subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Since there is no statement in the petition that petitioner no.2 did not purchase anything from the suspect in question, anticipatory bail of petitioner no.2 ( Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Sarraf) is rejected. shahid (Barin Ghosh, J) - 2 -