IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11570 of 2006 Ramashish Singh, s/o- late Ramratan Singh, r/o- Bajrangbali Colony, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District- Patna. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Road Construction Department, Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Chief Engineer, (Mech.) Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. Superintending Engineer, National Highway Mechanical Circle, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna. 5. Executive Engineer (Mechanical) Mechanical Division, National Highway, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna. ----------- 4 12.07.2011 Both sides present. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner would be satisfied if the representation of the petitioner is considered and disposed of by respondent No. 3. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, submits that in the facts/situation, Article 14 of the Constitution of India cannot be invoked. However, considering the stand of the petitioner, he does not object disposal of the case in the aforesaid term. Having heard the parties, this Court disposes of the application by the following order: Let the petitioner file a detailed representation within three weeks along with a copy of the order before respondent No. 3. The said respondent shall consider and dispose of the application in accordance with law as expeditiously as 2 possible. Let it be recorded that this Court has not gone into the merit of the case. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J)