^ S"' >N' C ^-'1 ^ry^ /^- BEjyCH IN THE mOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ,:^0 W.P. rs) NO. PETITIONER RESPQNDENTS ^•^ ^M^ ^<%u'^""" -.•<^<^^--'' ^F ^ ...•<<3^ ^^" ^" ,.<•' ^ VERSUS L' 2. 3. 4. / 2009 ^' Aditya Narayan Jaiswal, S/o Late Prabhunarayan Jaiswal, aged about 50 years, R/o Bouripara Ambikapur, Distt Surguja (C.G.) State ofChhattisgarh Through- the Secretary, Department of Excise, D.K.S. Bhawan, R^ipur (C.G.) The Excise Commissioner., Govemment of Chhattisgarh Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) District Excise Officer, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) Collector Surguja, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF JNDIA 371^1 ^? r<tlich 3T^T s^^ich^rfi^ ^" ^"sr '^PTT?R. '^frOT%. [c«ni^y SIT^T T^SR _.....^...e:..^>^.^^ ""^ 2 ^l^dl $h^|ch 't^re^T' ^n^r ^<nw "Hf^T ct?l^t<yt<flr1 '^TR^ff ^ ^S ipal^K '^^Tf^msn^T SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICB PRITIltKBR OIWAKEjl 02.12.2010 •f Shri A.N.Pandey^ counsel for t] Shri Ajit Singh, P.L. for the St^ Grievance of the petitioner ir^ 1.4.1981 he was appointed as sale^man iri the Exciae Department however^ vide order dated 28.2.19 following the principles of naturalju^tice and the service rules. Counsel for the petitioner s|ubmits that the appeal of the petitioner filed on 30.5.09 (Annexijire P/7) is pending before the respondent No.l and the purpose served if direction is issued to the ^espondent No.l for deciding the pending appeal of the petitioner. State counsel has no objectiorj No.l for deciding the pending appe4I of the petitioner if already not decided. In the facts and circumstanj^es of the case^ the petition is disposed of with a direction to the ^esp. No.l to decide the pending appeal of the petitioner (Annexure P/|7) if already not decided till date. It would be the duty of the petitionej about the passing of this order by fij with the copy of this appeal. It is expected from the resp. I^o. 1 to decide the pending appeal of the petitioner as expeditiously period of three months from the date| It is made clear that this Cou) on merits of the case and the authorjity concerned would be at iiberty to decide the appeal strictly in accorc) |ie petitioner. Lte. the present petitian is that on 04 he was terminated without [of filing this petition would be if direction is issued to the resp. r to apprise the respondent No. 1 ling a fresh representation along as possible preferably within a 1 of receipt of copy of this order. rt has not exprcssed any opinion ance with law. ^{ .s,AIO^et ^^w