1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (O) No. 1052 OF 2009 in M.C.A. (St.) No. 16714 OF 2009 in W.P. NO. 2461/1997 (d) (Vivekanant Dhyanpeeth (Convent) ..vs.. Presiding Officer, University and College Tribunal& oths) =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mrs. U.A.Patil, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. S.N.Shende, Adv. H/f Mr. B.G.Kulkarni, Advocate for R.No.2 None for the respondent Nos.1 and 3 though served. C ORAM : Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J. DATED : 28th January, 2010. This is an application for condonation of delay of 136 days in filing an application for restoration of Writ Petition. The notice of application is served upon the respondents. Respondent No.3 has filed affidavit/reply to oppose the application. Heard learned counsel for both sides. For the reasons made out in the Civil Application, the same is allowed. The delay of 136 days in filing an application for restoration of writ petition, is condoned. Civil Application is disposed of. Office to number the MCA (St.) No. 16714 of 2009. 2 M.C.A.. (St.) No. 16714 of 2009 This Misc. Civil Application is taken out for restoration of Writ Petition, which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 02/5/2008. The applicants state in the application that the matter was unattended by their Advocate due to inadvertence. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 states in his fairness that he does not oppose the application. Therefore, the Misc. Civil Application is allowed. Writ Petition No. 2461 of 1997 is restored to the file. Office to place the writ petition for final hearing in due course. JUDGE. Diwale