IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43157 of 2009 TANIK LAL YADAV @ UPENDRA YADAV @ LULHA YADAV, S/o Bachu Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 16.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 427, 302, 452 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report wherein about eighty seven persons were named and his name transpired during further investigation, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 07.06.2008 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Namita Singh, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gaya (or his successor in the office) in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 75 of 2003, G.R. No. 2543 of 2003 subject to the following - 2 - conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)