IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 5772 of 2009(N) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.JANARDHANAN NAIR, INSPECTOR OF BRANCHES(NOT IN SERVICE)HEAD OFFICE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD, RESIDING AT TILAK, SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-10. BY ADV. SRI.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR SMT.SUSHYA RAJAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT, OF CO-OPERATION SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, P.B.NO.115, M.G.ROAD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. R1 AND R2 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI K C SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... WP(C).NO. 5772 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2009 JUDGMENT Notice to third respondent dispensed with, preserving its right to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2. All that the petitioner states is that Ext.P3 appeal filed against an order of dismissal, that too, issued with retrospective effect, is pending consideration from April 2008. There is no reason why that statutory appeal shall not be considered and disposed of by the competent authority in accordance with law, at the earliest. Hence it is directed that the competent authority in the third respondent, will take up Ext.P3, hear the petitioner and issue a final decision thereon, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/25/2