2iiKtab!c :yf;a 5 IN THE mOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT: BILASPUR W. P. Art. 227 No. <2,^8° OF 2010 PETITIONER: pr,^<ai#-<'»' V10 ^.^"•^ Ramphul Yadav, aged 65 years, son of Shri Sonu Yadav, resident of village Sukulpara, Kharaud, tahsil Pamgarh, districf Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) rDecree-holdert ^ -q^^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. Durga Prasad Yadav, aged 45 years, son ofKamta Prasad Yadav, 2. Mohari Kunwar Yadav, aged 55 years, wife oflate Shri Bhikham Yadav, Wy^ 3. Jagat Ram Yadav, aged 50 years, son of Shri Dulari Yadav, "•^s,,^,. •?:y^S~ai. y^yw^ B I 4. Ramlal Yadav, aged 50 years, son ofShri Kalaram Yadav, ^ ^.^,M .^r M ' . ' . All are residents of village Sukulpara, Kharaud, tahsil Pamgarh, district Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) (^Judement-debtorl 5.~ Chhattisgarh Board ofRevenue, Bilaspur (C.G.) 6. Additional Collector, Janjgir-Champa, Janjgir (C.G.) 7. Sub Divisional Officer, Pamgarh, district Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ^Mutation/Revenue Authoritv) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OE THE CONSTITUTION OF BSIDIA. ^ ""•!•-.,. '"•%' "••A ^•.f!"'"'\ 1 'bSS^~9i' § 6, ^-.<>° '<' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Petitioner Respondents Writ Petition (227) No. 3280 of2010 : Ramphul Yadav Versus Durga Prasad Yadav & Others WKTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTTrunON OF INDIA fSB: Hon'Me Mr. N.K. AearwaLJJ \ Present : Shri Sonmath Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Anil Pandey, Advocate for the respondent No. 1 & 4. Shri YC Shanna, Advoeate forthe respondent No. 2. ORALORDER (Passedon 05.01.2011) Stn-i Vermd, leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission ofthis court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh application under Section 178 ofthe C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959 ffor short 'the 1. Code') before the Tehsildar for partition ofthe suit land. He also prays that if such an application is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be deeided expeditiously by the Tehsildar as early as possible preferably within a period ofsix months. Prayer is not opposed by the counsel appearing for the respondents. Therefore, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this pet'tion with liberty as prayed for. It is directed that m case the petitioner files an applieation within a period of one moth from today before the Tehsildar, the Tehsildar shall decide the same within a period of six months from the date ofswvice ofsummons onthe opposite party. Accordingly the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty. No order as to costs. : — Sahu Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge