IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18081 of 2010 SRI NARAYAN SINGH & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 22-07-2010 Heard, learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are languishing in jail since 4-1- 2010 in a case registered under sections 302/34 of the I.P.C.. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that the informant saw the injured person at the door of Shri Narayan Singh but subsequently he came to know that victim developed some relationship with the daughter of petitioner No. 1 and on the alleged date of occurrence the victim entered the house and tried to outrage of modesty of the daughter of petitioner No. 1 as a result of which the victim was assaulted by all family members. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the informant is not an eye witness. During investigation no witness has claimed himself to be an eye witness to the occurrence. This contention has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the State. It is further submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the State that in the case diary it has come 2 that the victim has criminal history and used to establish the physical relationship with other girls also. Considering the nature of allegation and the fact that from the F.I.R. it appears that the informant had not seen the actual occurrence. Let the petitioners, namely Shri Narayan Singh and Chandrakant Singh @ Bittu be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Samastipur, in connection with Vidyapati Nagar P.S. case No. 40/2009. S.P. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)