IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21878 of 2008 CHUNCHUN SINGH @ RANVEER @ ALOK @ FIGHTER SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 20.8.2008 Petitioner’s bail application under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was earlier rejected on 28.11.2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that three persons who have identified him are not named in the First Information Report. The second submission of the learned counsel is that Bambam Singh has been granted bail by this Court by Criminal Miscellaneous No. 22192 of 2008 dated 9.6.2008. Bambam Singh has been named in the F.I.R. and he has also been named by the witnesses. This Court has granted bail to Bambam Singh on the ground that he is orders giver whereas rest of the accused persons are the persons who had fired on the deceased. The petitioner’s case is therefore, distinguishable from the case of Bambam Singh and in any event in a case of this type where there is double murder and three persons have identified, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the observation of this Court that 2 Bambam Singh is an order giver is an error of record. In fact, he is the person who had shot the deceased. However, this Court is not going to examine this aspect of the matter. Let the trial of this case be expedited. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan,J.)