<y.~ ;ili'[:i;i":^":^ ""•I cr- IN THE HI6H COURT OF JUOICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION(ArtJ27)^10.1^3^L O^ 2^W PETITIONER (Plaintiff) '•••*.' y^^. '^ffw' ^^^•KA.*-''" ,'v',1t \" ' N| !..• Smt. Mangtin Bai, aged about 59 years, uvife of Shri Samaru Sonkar, resident of Village iBhatagaon, Raipur, Tehsil and Diistrict Raipur (C.6.) Vs RESPONbENTS befendants :!| . j.|t ..lil^.l^^'^r;^ ;"^L ^ ~%i 'ft. lsi^' |.,,5|l|^|i3.^ 1 I ^"r^ ff ^1:3 ^ 1. Smt. (Sulaba Bai, aged about 63 years, wife of Shri Ramji Sonkar. ^ .2. Ramji Sonkar, aged about 65 i,:;,. years. Bpth residents of Village Bhatagaon, Raipur, Tehsil and District Raipur (C.6.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION . OF INDIA ^ HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (2271 N0.1479 OF 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS DEFEyDANTS Smt. Mangtin Bai Versus Smt. Gulaba Bai and another. Kvr WRIT PET!TION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTiT'JTiON OF !ND!A SSinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri N.K. Aaarwal. J.) Present : Shri Kshitiz Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri P.P. Sahu, counsel forthe respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 25th day ofJanuary, 2011) In view of the fact that the suit is pending since 2008, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition can be disposed of directlng the trial Court to decide the suit within specified time frame. 2. The prayer is reasonable. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed and it is directed that the triai Court shall decide the suit as eariy as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4. Both the parties undertake to cooperate with the Trial Court in early disposal of the suit. Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge