IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated 12.2.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.33728 of 2006 1.D.Jayaprakash, 2.L.Sampath, 3.S.Samsonwood, 4.C.Sekar, 5.G.Balaji, 6.P.Mookkan, 7.E.Suresh, 8.P.Sathiyanathan, 9.K.Nagesh, 10.K.Mohana Krishnan, 11.V.Anthony, 12.S.Haribabu, 13,S.Mariyachalament, 14.K.Mohan. ... Applicants / Petitioners -Vs.- 1.The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, St. George Fort, Chennai-9. 2.Chief Engineer (Buildings), Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 3.Superintendending Engineer, Electrical Circle, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 4.Assistant Executive Engineer, Electrical Sub Division II, Public Works Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9. 5.Assistant Engineer, Electrical P.W.D., N.Ms. Estate, Chennai-2. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6.Assistant Executive Engineer, Electrical Sub Division No.III, Public Works Department, K.M.C. Campus, Chennai-10 ... Respondents Original Application No.9300 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying for Mandamus directing the respondent to bring the Petitioners on time scale of pay and regularise the service of the applicants from the date of the first appointment as per G.O.Ms.No.52 Finance dated 14.1.77 and grant consequential benefits. Since the Tamilnadu Appellate Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. For petitioner : Mr.G.Elanchezhian For respondents : Mr.B.Vijay, Government Advocate O R D E R Original Application No.9300 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench praying for Mandamus directing the respondent to bring the applicants on time scale of pay and regularise the service of the applicants from the date of the first appointment as per G.O.Ms.No.52 Finance dated 14.1.77 and grant consequential benefits. Since the Tamilnadu Appellate Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. 2. At the time of final hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners/applicants states that the representation dated 13.1.1998 has not been disposed off on merits. The petitioners seek regularisation and submits that a liberty may be given to make further representation if the grievance is not considered so far. 3. Considering the nature of relief now sought for, the petitioners are permitted to make further representation to the second respondent within a month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the second respondent shall dispose off the same within two months thereafter on merits and in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is disposed off accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar. /true copy/ ts Sub Asst.Registrar. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To 1.The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, St. George Fort, Chennai-9. 2.Chief Engineer (Buildings), Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 3.Superintendending Engineer, Electrical Circle, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 4.Assistant Executive Engineer, Electrical Sub Division II, Public Works Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9. 5.Assistant Engineer, Electrical P.W.D., N.Ms. Estate, Chennai-2. 6.Assistant Executive Engineer, Electrical Sub Division No.III, Public Works Department, K.M.C. Campus, Chennai-10. 1 cc to mr.G. Elanchezhian, Advocate, Sr. 9593 W.P.No.33728 of 2006 RSN (CO) kk 4/3 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/