1 7 revn appln 633.09.doc srk- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 633 OF 2009 AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 631 OF 2009 Shri Maruti Bajirao Jagdale .. Applicants Versus Jay Shivray Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit & Anr. .. Respondents Mr.Ajit Kenjale for the Applicant. Mr. Dilip Shinde i/b Mr. Pradeep Gole for the Respondent no.1. Ms. M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for the Respondent no.2/State. CORAM : J. H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 18TH AUGUST, 2010 P.C.: 1 Revision was filed against the conviction under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and dismissal of the Appeal by the Sessions Court. Now the parties have filed the Consent Terms marked “X”. Wherein, it is stated that the parties have amicably settled all the disputes and the Respondent/Complainant seeks to withdraw the complaint. Thus, they have compounded the case. The complainant has received its entire dues, Therefore, the Revision Application is allowed as per the consent terms 2 7 revn appln 633.09.doc and the impugned judgments passed by the Courts below are hereby set aside. The accused is hereby acquitted. He is allowed to withdraw the amount of Rs.5,000/- deposited by him before the Sessions Court and Rs. 7,155/- before this Court. 2 The Revision Application stands disposed of. 3 As the Revision Application itself is disposed of, the Criminal Application No. 631 of 2009 does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)