THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P.NO.27195 OF 2010 O R D E R Heard both the counsel. 2. The case of the petitioner as stated in the writ affidavit is that since 2007 he is carrying on business of selling farm fresh chicken and meat at plot no.8-2-293/82/BE/N/1 to 3, Navanirman Nagar, Road No.71, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad – 500 096. The further case of the petitioner is that a dispute in W.P.No.27862/2008 is pending before this court with regard to possession of Navanirman Nagar Welfare Bhavan and by order dated 23.12.2008, this court directed to maintain status quo with regard to possession. As the lis is pending, the said Navanirman Nagar Welfare Association, in whose premises the petitioner is running business, is not in a position to execute lease deed. Now the grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents issued impugned notice No.W/8/B/52 dated 29.10.2010 directing him to close the business, on the ground that he is not having trace licence from the respondents. The further case of the petitioner is that when he applied for issuance of trade licence, he was asked to produce a rental deed or a lease deed or a sale deed of the premises in his favour. As stated above, as lis pertaining to the schedule property is pending before this court, the Welfare Association of Navanirman Nagar is not in a position to execute any deed. Hence, he filed the present writ petition challenging the impugned notice dated 29.10.2010. 3. The leaned standing counsel Sri Y.Padmavathi, for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the respondents are in no way concerned with the lis in W.P.No.27862/2008 and unless the petitioner produces the relevant documents viz., (1) Self Assessment Form, (2) Rental deed/lease deed/sale deed, (3) property tax payment receipts up to date, (4) location plans – blue print copies – 3, (5) NOC from two immediate neighbors, (6) Sanctioned plan obtained from GHMC/MCH, (7) pass port size photos and (8) physical fitness certificate obtained from registered medical practioner, which are mandatory for issuance of Trade licence as per HMC Act, the same cannot be granted. 4. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances and the submissions of the counsel, this court is of the view that under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, this court cannot grant exemption of the documents, which are mandatory under the HMCA Act for issuance of trade licene and it is for the petitioner to make an appropriate application before the authorities concerned seeking relaxation for any document, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. The writ petition is disposed of with the following direction: “The petitioner is given liberty to submit fresh application, coupled with all the necessary documents, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and thereafter within a period of two weeks, the respondent shall dispose of the said application in accordance with law.” 5. No order as to costs. AVS ---------------------------------- 23—12—2010