IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40930 of 2009 RAM NARESH SINGH & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.12.2009 Heard. The earlier rejection is Annexure-1 and the renewal prayer is again under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. To me once an anticipatory bail petition has been dismissed on merit, the court is completely devoid of its jurisdiction to entertain it simply for the reasons that there could not be any other fact to be considered except what it has already recorded. The case is under Section 307 of the IPC and all the seven petitioners are named in the FIR with specific allegations of participation, one way or the other. The injuries were as incisive as indicated in my earlier rejection order. The contention is that the police submitted final form reporting the case false. Further, it was contended that the C.J.M., Samastipur differed with the opinion of the I.O. and has taken cognizance of the offence under Section 307 of the Penal Code. Let the petitioners surrender in the court below and pray for regular bail. The renewal prayer is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )