IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 17TH JULY 2007 / 26TH ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 19070 of 2004(T) -------------------------- CRMP.4613/2004 of J.M.F.C.-III, PUNALUR .................... PETITIONER: ------------- SANTHOSH S/O.VIKRAMAN NAIR, MANAGER, CENTURION BANK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PMG R/A.KALATHUNGAL KARAKULAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------- 1. MANOJ KUMAR, PANAIL PUTHEN VEEDU, ELAMBAL, PUNALOOR. 2. MANU @ MANOJ, S/O.DIVAKARAN, CHERUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, VETTITHITTA, ALIMUKKU, PUNALOOR. 3. STATE OF KERALA,R EP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R2 BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV SRI.K.V.VINODKUMAR R3 BY ADV. SRI.SHYSON P. MANGUZHA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/07/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 19070 OF 2004 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of July, 2007 JUDGMENT The Government Pleader has already taken notice on behalf of 3rd respondent. The 2nd respondent is already served. Notice to 1st respondent is returned with endorsement 'unclaimed'. Notice on 1st respondent is declared sufficient. Service complete. Even though stay was applied for, the same was not granted. The submission of the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent that the writ petition has virtually become infructuous, has only to be accepted and the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE btt WPC 2