1 ao120-05 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.120 OF 2005 Smt. Prafulla S. Shetty .. Appellant V/s. Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai .. Respondents .... None for the appellant. Mrs. K. K. Soraan for respondent-BMC. .... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 23, 2011. P.C. None appears for the appellant. Advocate for respondent is present. At the time of admission of the Appeal, this Court on 1st March, 2005, passed a detailed order in Civil Application No. 115 of 2009, granting limited ad-interim injunction to the appellant, subject to condition of the appellant filing an undertaking as stated therein. The office noting shows that in terms of the said order, undertaking was filed by the appellant. 2. The limited interim relief granted by this Court is operating 2 ao120-05 almost for the last six years. If the suit is still pending, the said order deserves to continue till the final disposal of the suit. 3. Hence, Appeal From Order is disposed of by directing that in the event, the main suit is still pending, the interim order passed by this Court on 1st March, 2005 will continue to operate till the final disposal of the suit. It is obvious, in view of the continuation of the said order, even the appellant will be bound by the said undertaking given to the Court till the disposal of the suit. 4. It is obvious that if suit is not longer pending, the interim order will not apply. If the suit is pending, the same shall be decided on its own merits without influence by the impugned order and grant of protection by this Court. JUDGE