IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1066 of 2002 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- URVASHI CHETAN DOSHI Versus CHETAN SHANTILAL DOSHI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR YS MANKAD for the Petitioner. RULE SERVED for the Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 05/04/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.Mankad, learned Advocate for the petitioner, states that since the parties have settled their dispute, this revision application has become infructuous. He, therefore, wants permission to withdraw this CRA. Permission is granted. The CRA is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Interim relief is vacated. No costs. 5th April, 2004 ( P.B. Majmudar, J. ) **** (apj)