IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 242 of 2006 (S/B) V. N. Singh, Deputy General Manager (Electrical), THDC, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand. ………. Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Power, New Delhi. 2. Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Tehri Hydro Development Corporation Ltd., Rishikesh. 3. Director (Technical) / Disciplinary Authority, Tehri Hydro Development Corporation Ltd., Rishikesh. ……… Respondents None for the petitioner. Ms. Beena Pandey, Standing Counsel (Central Govt.) for respondents No. 1. None for respondents Nos. 2 & 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Petitioner’s counsel absent. Ms. Beena Pandey, Standing Counsel (Central. Govt.) for respondents No. 1. None for respondents Nos. 2 & 3. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 23.11.2007 23.11.2007 G