IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY TUESDAY, THE 16TH AUGUST 2011 / 25TH SRAVANA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 2659 of 2011() ------------------------ CC.82/2010 of CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THRISSUR .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------ 1. MUHAMMED HANEEFA, S/O.K.B.MOIDEEN, BISMI MANZIL,ROYAL GARDEN, KOORKANCHERRY,THRISSUR. 2. SHAHEED, S/O.MOIDEEN SHAH,BISMI MANZIL,THOPINMOOLA, ARANATTUKARA,THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. P.SAJITHA, W/O.K.HASHIM,ARAKKAL HOUSE, MUTHUVATTUR,CHAVAKKAD. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTR SRI.JAIBY PAUL THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.MC.No. 2659 of 2011() ----------------------------------- APPENDIX --------------- PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES --------------------------------------- ANNEXURE A1. COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.556/2009 ON THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THRISSUR, DT. 20.07.2009. ANNEXURE A1(A). COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF ANNEXURE A1. ANNEXURE A2. COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.556/2009 ON THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THRISSUR ANNEXURE A2(A). THE LEGIBLE COPY OF THE ANNEXURE A2 ANNEXURE A2(B). COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATIN OF ANNEXURE A2. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURE : NIL ---------------------------------------- / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK B.P. RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No. 2659 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of August, 2011. O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The petitioners are the accused in Crime No. 556 of 2009 of East Police Station, Thrissur for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 34 IPC and now pending as C.C. No. 82 of 2010 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thrissur. I am not inclined to quash the charge at this stage. It is open to the petitioners to plead for discharge before the concerned court. If such an application is filed within six weeks from today, the learned Magistrate shall pass reasoned orders thereon. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the personal appearance of the petitioners may not be insisted upon before the trial court. If the petitioners file an application under Section 205 Cr.P.C before the trial court, the same shall be allowed on such terms and conditions the learned Magistrate deems fit. This Crl.M.C. is disposed of as above. sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE. rv