IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.30870 of 2009 DINESH MAHTO, S/O Ramotar Mahto, R/V Birsaiya, P.S. Bibhutipur, district Samastipur .. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR .. Opposite Party **** /3/ 08.10.2009 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 341, 324,307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that earlier petitioner had himself filed a petition before the Sarpanch stating therein that his daughter’s modesty was attempted to be outraged by the grand-son of the informant and also the fact that simple injury has been found on the person of the injured, let the petitioner, above named, who is in custody since 20.06.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 77 of 2009 to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, district Samastipur, on the conditions that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who 2 will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail and that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and will not delay the trial and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner then his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)