1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3564 OF 2007 (Mohammad Ismail Mohammad Usman .v. Mahindrakumar Ratanlal Agrawal) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri M.V. Samarth, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.M. Deshpande, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. 6TH FEBRUARY, 2008. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges concurrent finding of facts arrived at by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Achalpur dated 26th April, 2007 vide which the application filed by the respondent/plaintiff for temporary injunction has been granted and the order passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Achalpur dated 18th June, 2007 thereby dismissing the appeal filed by the present petitioner. In view of concurrent finding of facts, I am not inclined to entertain the petition. However, since an order of status quo is operating in the present matter right from September, 2007, I find that the interest of justice would be met if the trial Court is directed to 2 expedite the suit and the parties are directed to maintain status quo. In that view of the matter, the learned trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from today. It is further directed that the parties shall maintain status quo till then. It is needless to state that the observations made by the learned trial Court as well as learned appellate Court are limited for the purposes of consideration of the application for temporary injunction and the same shall not have any effect on the merits of the matter. JUDGE *rrg.