WWW mamma- PETiTlONER Smt. Manju Tiwari, W/o Shri Vikas Tiwari, agad, years, R/o N6ar Old R.T.O. Office, about 40 Mungdi 1\] Ve‘ RESPONDENTS 1. 511$ Municipal Municipal Bilaspur (d Building d (CG) aka, Bilaspur (CG) Corporation, Bilaspur through — Commissioner, Municipal Corporation 5G) :fiicer, Municipal Corporation Bilaspur O[ sel for tho petitioner. E‘l for tho respondonts—Corporation. 226 of the Constitution of India Writ Petition under Article SB: HON. SHRI DHIRENDRA MysHRA, J. 16—03-2009 Shri Anup Majumdar, c Shii A.S. Kachhawaha, c Heard. W‘P. (C) No. 1139/09 wa‘ disposod of on 26th February 2009 after recording the Statement f loaned counsol for tho Municipal Corporation that the Corporatio Shall pass appropriate orders within a period of one week after consi ering the reply of the petitioner to the i notice as per provisions of law, and till that time, no steps shall be ‘ taken to demolish ?v part ofth structure in dispute, The petitioner has filed Without complying the above 0rd r and Without paesiilg any order after \ o o ‘ WW, m, W WW 3i 200 31ml W (Wu) WWW ammamias WWW r2; c0n5id€ring the reply of tha ,p6 Coxporation has again issu€d n to demolish the additional c WW§f€ém $aim3né§1 f5 titioxier to the notice, the respondsnt— otice of Annexurs P—8 dated 28.2.2009 raction undertaken by him Within a ‘h the same shall be demolished by the , o period of seven days, failing w ‘ " Corporation at The expenee of p ititioner. i A. S. I<achhawal respondents— Comoratlo'n s compounding irregular con already been rejected. He construction by the petitioner Corporation shall be passing the petitioner, as earlier direc week from today. The Corpor petitioner’s house till his applic direction of this Court. In View of the above sub petition is disposed ofWitli a d' to decide the application of period of one week from today. the house of petitioner shall be I In View of ' e above order learned counsel appearing for the ts that the petitioner’s prayer for ction beyond sanctioned map has ther submits that the additional not been demolished so far, and the d orders on compromise petition of by this Court, within a period of one on shall not demolish any part of the ation for compromise is decided as per ission of Shri A. S. Kachhawaha, this ection to the respondents— Corporation e petitioner for compromise Within a ‘ill his application is decided, no part of iemolished . , LA. No. 1 stands disposed& sdl ? \ r€/" / w V/ Judge h l u s d t ' a t , i 1 r s ' e /