IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1506 of 2010 BIRENDRA PODDAR S/OLATE BABU LAL PODDAR R/O VILL- SAMSA, P.O- SAMSA, VIA- MANASOORCHAK, P.S- MANSOORCHAK, DISTT- BEGUSARIA, BIHAR RETIRAL AS SPORT EXECUTIVE BIHAR STTE SPORTS AUTHORITY RAJENDRA NAGAR PATNA UNDER ART, CULTURE AND YOUTH DEPARTMENT, GOVT OF BIHAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, ART, CULTURE AND YOUTH DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, ART,CULTURE AND YOUTH DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, VIKAS BHAWAN, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR CUM JOINTSECRETARY, ART, CULTURE AND YOUTH DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, VIKAS BHAWAN, PATNA 4. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, ART, CULTURE AND YOUTH DEPRTMENT, VIKAS BHAWAN, PATNA 5. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, BIHAR STATE SPORT AUTHORITY, RAJENDRA NAGAR, PATNA 6. THE DIRECTOR CUM SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE SPORTS AUTHORITY, RAJENDRA NAGAR, PATNA 7. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, BIRCHAND PATEL MARG, PATNA 8. THE DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE GENERAL PROVIDENT FUND, PANT BHWAN, PATNA 9. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT OFFICER, PATNA ----------- 06. 10.11.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that though the G.P.F. dues have been paid, however, the interest over the same has been paid up to July 2009 whereas the G.PF. amount was paid in the month of February 2010. It is further submitted that petitioner had submitted the application for withdrawal of G.P.F. on 18th of June 2009 and as such, it is not correct on the part of the respondent to say that the application for withdrawal was made on 17th of February 2010. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled for interest till the date of payment. The other grievance of the petitioner is that the amount of Leave encashment has been paid in the old scale. It is required to be paid in the revised scale. Besides the above, the third grievance is that a sum of Rs. 6,000/- and odd has been deducted from the amount of leave encashment without indicating the reasons for such deduction and as such, the deduction is not correct in absence of valid justification which the petitioner has not been informed. Learned counsel for the State submits that all the above three grievances would be considered and upon considering if any, amount is found payable, the same shall be paid to the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims with regard to the above grievances, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 9 for claiming of interest over the G.P.F. amount till the date of retirement. So far as the amount of leave encashment as also the deduction of Rs. 6,000/- are concerned, petitioner proposes to file a separate representation before the respondent no. 3. In view of the above, in case, such separate representations stating details of unpaid claims are filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representations shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable may also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)