IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43871 of 2008 SHIYASHARAN YADAV, S/o Bhanu Yadav, R/o Khagariper, P.S. Dhanarua, Dist.Patna Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 5/ 28.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the husband has not been made accused in the case. He was working in Madras and deceased was insisting to accompany him and due to non-compliance, she consumed poison. There is no occasion to make husband accused as differences shown in the F.I.R. are otherwise. She was living alone and being cruelly treated by in-laws family members as alleged, an attempt is made to defend the family members. For that, several witnesses appeared to state that due to not her taking to Madras, she consumed poison, but all the witnesses came after the death only not earlier. It was a case of poisoning with no force then neighbour should be informed. She should be taken to hospital. In any case, some attempt should be made by the family members to save her, that is not done rather dead body is disposed of without informing her deceased’s parents family. Thus, I find it is not fit case for bail. The application is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)