1 chs1491.10.sxw ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1491 OF 2010 IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 1325 OF 2010 M/s. Sicom Investments & Finance Ltd. ......Plaintiffs. Vs. Rajesh Kumar Drolia & Anr. ......Defendants. None for the Plaintiffs. Ms. Nisha Parmar for the Defendants. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE :- 9 SEPTEMBER 2011. P.C. :- The Plaintiffs have filed the Summons for Judgment based upon the various documents. The Defendants, therefore, sought inspection of original documents at Exhibits A, B, E and F. As on 26 July 2010 appointment was fixed for the inspection of the original documents however, the originals of the said documents were not given for inspection as per the averments made in the Plaint by the Defendants. In reply to this Chambers Summons, the Plaintiffs contended that they 2 chs1491.10.sxw ssm have given complete inspection of all the documents referred and relied upon in the Plaint, but there is no specific denial to the letter dated 27 July 2010, whereby the Defendants have specifically pointed out that the original documents as referred in the Plaint, were not available in the office of the Advocate for the Plaintiff and the Plaintiffs never given the inspection of the same. 2 In view of this, as the Defendants sought specific inspection of original documents referred above, and as the Plaintiffs as per Defendants contention, failed to give inspection, the consequences of the same should follow in accordance with law. 3 In view of this, the Chamber Summons is disposed of with no order as to costs. 4 At the request of the learned counsel appearing for the Defendants, two weeks time is granted to file reply to the Summons for Judgment. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)