FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NOS.2195 of 2008 in W.P.No.9364/04, CIVIL APPLICATION NOS.2196 of 2008 in W.P.No.9192/04, CIVIL APPLICATION NOS.2197 of 2008 in W.P.No.9193/04, ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr S.A.Sawant along with Mr Sameer Suryawanshi for the applicant. Mr D.A.Patil, AGP for the respondent-State. Mr Abhijit Kadam, for respondent no.1 in CA No.2195/08 and R.No.2 in CA no.2196/08 and R.No.4 in CA no.2197/08. Mr Anil Desai, for respondent nos 1 to 3 in C.A.No.2195/08. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATED: 18/09/2008 P.C.: Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The applicant has prayed for recalling an order dated 30.11.2004 disposing of three writ petitions nos. 9364/04, 9192/04 and 9193/04. All the three writ petitions were disposed off by the order dated 30.11.2004 in terms of the Minutes of Order duly signed by the Advocates appearing for the parties. The applicant was not party in these petitions. In view thereof, the applicant cannot seek the relief as prayed in the applications. It is always open to the applicant to adopt remedies as are available in law. It is also open to the applicant to intervene in the proceedings before Revenue Authorities and if such an application is filed by the applicant, same may be considered on merits in accordance with law. The applications are rejected. Mr Sawant, learned counsel for the applicant, at this stage, submitted that the order passed in terms of the Minutes would not bind the applicant. He may take such plea or raise such contention before the appropriate court/authorities in appropriate proceedings. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)