1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.144 OF 2010 Arvind Haribhau Gokhale ..vs.. Shirish Haribhau Gokhale & others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr S.R.Deshpande, advocate for the appellant Shri N.S. Deshpande & V.Y.Nilawar advocate for respondent no.1 Smt. Neeta Jog, advocate for respondent no.2 to 6 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : APRIL 22, 2010 . Heard learned counsel for the parties. The Learned counsel for the parties have presented a compromise pursis / petition in the court today. The same is accepted on record and marked as Exhibit “Z”. The pursis is signed by the appellant, the respondent no.1 & 2 and the respondent no.4. It appears from the record that the respondent no.4 is the power of attorney holder for respondent no. 3,5, and 6 and has signed the compromise pursis on behalf of respondent no.3,5 & 6. The appellant, the respondent no.1, 2 and 4 are personally present in the court today. Since the respondent no.4 is the power of attorney holder for the respondent no.3,5 &6, he represents respondent no.3,5 & 6 in the court today. 2 I have personally talked to the parties who are present in the court today. I have enquired whether they are agreeable to the terms and conditions mentioned in the compromise pursis. All of them have stated that they are ad-id-em over the terms and conditions mentioned in the compromise pursis and they have settled the matter in terms of the compromise pursis at exhibit “Z”. I have perused the terms and conditions of the compromise pursis. The terms of the compromise pursis appear to be extremely just and reasonable. Hence the second appeal is decreed in terms of the compromise pursis at Exhibit “Z’ by modifying the judgment and decree passed by the trial and the first appellate court. A decree be drawn accordingly in terms of of the pursis at Exhibit “Z”. In the facts of the case, there would be no orders as to costs. JUDGE SMP