1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 283 OF 2011 (Union of India & Ors. vs. Shri A.N. Pant & Ors.) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. AUGUST 03, 2011. Heard Shri Sundaram, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Lahiri, learned counsel for the respondents. It is apparent that Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) has not considered Rule 8 of Assured Promotion Scheme. Shri Lahiri, learned counsel has attempted to demonstrate that said rule is not applicable, however, this aspect is also not looked into by CAT. In this situation, Shri Lahiri, learned counsel for the respondents states that instead of admitting the matter for final hearing, it should be sent back to CAT for appropriate adjudication. Hence, without recording any further reasons, we quash and set aside the judgment dated 28.04.2010 delivered by CAT. The proceedings in O.A. No. 2117 of 2005 are restored back to the file of 2 CAT for taking fresh decision, after hearing respective counsel, at the earliest. The CAT shall attempt to decide the controversy by 31st December 2011. Writ petition is accordingly partly allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.