HEGH COURT OF CHHtTTIARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition 227 i i i i Petitidners (Defaihdant) SG o. 451 5 of 2008 1) The Chief Geniral Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limiteg, Chhattisgarh, - Talecom Parimandai, Rarifur (CG). The Teieco Sanchar Nigam Near Ayappa Bastar (CG). Versus j Centrai Watch? and Eiectronic Company Parimr w— Shashi Bhushan Rath S/o. : Ramc‘nandra Rath, Aged about 35 yeara/ Suryakant Patel, Sfo. Narayan Patel, aged about 55 years, ,Goai Bazar Jagdaipur, Disti. Bastar (CG). -- Plaintiff. T.V. Ciinic Proprietor Sunil Singh Bhadauriya, $io. DR. Singh, aged abcut 41 yeare, R/o. _ Main Road, Dantewada, District Dantewada n (CG). Plaintiff. 3) Vandana Agency, Higher Secondary Schooi Read, Jagdaipur, District Bastar (CG). District Manager, Bharat Limited, Brindavan Colony, Mandir, Jagdaipur, District Resgdndents Defendant-u (Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India) $3: Hon’bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Subhash Yadav, counsei for the petitioners. , oRAL ORDER (Passed on this 18‘“ day of August, 2008' ‘The petitioners are impugning the order dated 29-4-2008 (Annexure: /5) passed by the Civii Judge, Class-ll, Jagdaipur, in Civil Suit No. 17-N2007, whereby the application of the petitioners for framing the issue with regard to the valuation and jurisdiction, was dismissed. 2) Shri Subhash Yadav, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners; submits that the suit is for declaration and permanentinjunction, but the value , of the property has to. be quantified for the purpose of court fees. ln the event, it 3: ’ is found that the value ofthe property in dispute was more than quantineg, the 5 ,.. ~“ P t é court beiow may have no jurisdiciion to entertain the suit. Learned Civil Judgeg, after hearing both the parties came to the conciusion as under. ‘W&§Rr}m#§fm§mww§a§€hmm Witter§raarmami51w§m§aa§mmmtr wzmmmWWawwmmwmw m%rw%wm§%%mmwmma§ wwmmwmwgxm Wmww‘r f wewwwmwmwifwrmw fl d red couneI apin‘f esd te 3) have hear lean s‘ peargor the petitioners, prue h dihg ums appded the O pl it fd that the pieas and docent en reto. n erusa, is oun suit o declarti an rmat inction ws i werei the rt fee is ot paye on he ai th py in dspe and oth iief s n abl t vue of e proert iut no er re ha ’ ee Th o ee by pianod r n bn sought for. e curt f paid the itiffsirespnents was corect, i acrance it he our Fe ct, 0 erefore, he plication cod wh t Ct e A 187, th t ap med by thei’ petitiers was rtly reected on igh j. iThs Cou n ex of s supevisory juisdiction unr l 22 of 4) i rt, i ercise it r r de Artice 7 Con i d rean ef fro rfn r‘ the stitution of ndia‘ shoui fri itsl m inteerig with the orde pad h u below ext n such cases ee very, iegy, sse by te cort , cep i whr persit ilalit’ irregurity or ura errr rt large o h fac of te ecr, i ot i the p cse. n n resent a 5 he d 9-00 b he ur bew ror; ) T orer dated 24-28 passed y t cot lo is just and ppe and does not warrant interference in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction of this Court. 6) Accordingly, the petition is dismissed summarily t ‘ Sdx— . - I: Sa 'Sh K Agmhotrl j i Raju r fr aon d penen niu a fled, hn cou la jisdictionl o is,wi n te e h rod whch is f J