1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 10729 OF 2009 Shobhabai w/o Laxman Pagore, Age: 70 years, Occ: Household & Agri., R/o. Kanchanwadi, Aurangabad. .. Appellant Versus Mohanrao s/o Laxmanrao Pagore, died through his L.Rs. 1. Kalabai w/o Mohanrao Pagare, Age: 75 years, Occ: Household, R/o. Pardhipura, Kotwalpura, Aurangabad. 2. Ramesh S/o Mohanrao Pagore, Age: 50 years, Occ: Service, R/o. Police Lane, Jalna, District Jalna. 3. Arun s/o Mohanrao Pagore, Age: 47 years, Occ: Service, R/o. Jeevan Nagar, Millcorner, Aurangabad. 4. Sanjay s/o Mohanrao Pagore, Age: 42 years, Occ: Business, R/o. As above. 5. Pramila w/o Deepak Narwade, Age: 54 years, Occ: Household, R/o. Sangavi (Navi) Pimpri Chinchwad, Pune. 6. Nirmala w/o Bhaskarrao Devalwar, Age: 54 years, Occ: Household, R/o. Thane. 2 7. The Tahsildar, Tahsil Office, Aurangabad. 8. The Talathi, Tahsil Office, Aurangabad. 9. The Sub Registrar, Near Collector Office, Aurangabad. 10. Dhana s/o Rama Pagore, Age: 72 years, Occ: Agri., R/o. Kanchanwadi, Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad. .. Respondents ... Mr. Pradeep Deshmukh, Advocate for appellant. Mr. A.M. Auti, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 6 and 10. ... CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J. DATE : 14TH DECEMBER, 2009. PER COURT : Heard Shri. Pradeep Deshmukh, learned Counsel for the appellant and Shri. A.M. Auti, learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 6 and 10. Shri. Pradeep Joshi, learned Counsel prays for deletion of respondent Nos. 7 to 9, as they are Revenue Officers and against whom, no decree 3 is passed. 2. Learned Counsel for the parties state that the appellant and respondent Nos. 1 to 6 and 10 have amicably settled the dispute between them and have entered into compromise. Learned Counsel for the parties further state that the compromise is duly affirmed by the parties on 29-09-2009. The consent terms are also signed by the respective Counsel appearing for the parties. Learned Counsel for the parties further state that the appellant and respondent Nos. 1 to 6 and 10 have been explained the compromise terms in Marathi. They further submit that the parties are present in the Court. The parties have confirmed the contents of the compromise. The compromise terms are marked as "X" for the purpose of identification and taken on record. 3. I am satisfied that the claim of the appellant and respondent Nos. 1 to 6 and 10 is wholly adjusted by lawful agreement in the form 4 of consent terms. The impugned judgment and decree dated 28-08-2006 stands set aside and substituted by the consent terms marked as "X". Decree be drawn accordingly. 4. First Appeal stands disposed of accordingly, in above terms. 5. In view of the final disposal of the First Appeal, nothing survives in the Civil Application No. 6959 of 2009 and Civil Application No. 6960 of 2009 and same are disposed of accordingly. ( R.G. KETKAR, J.) sut/DEC09/fast10729.09