1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7862/2005 (Smt. Prem Devi Vs. Presiding Officer, M.A.C.T. Jaipur City, Jaipur & Ors.) Date of Order :- 02.02.2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.CHAUHAN Mr.Vinay Mathur, for the petitioner. Mr.Inderjeet Singh, for the respondents. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 28.01.2005 and two other orders both dated 02.12.2003 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Jaipur City, Jaipur ('the learned Tribunal', in short) in claim petition Nos.1234/2003 and 1235/2003. The Brief facts of the case are that On 31.03.2003, petitioner's daughter Smt. Rukma and her husband Bhim Shankar died in a motor accident. They have left behind seven minor children. Since the paternal grand parents have also expired, the petitioner, being the maternal Grandmother of these seven children is looking after them. She filed two claim petitions before the learned M.A.C.T., Jaipur City, Jaipur on behalf of these seven children as their guardian 2 for getting the amount of compensation on account of death of their parents. During the pendency of these claim petitions, on 02.12.2003 the learned Tribunal passed an interim award in claim petition No.1234/03 in favour of the claimants. According to the order dated 02.12.2003, it was directed that Rs.50,000/- shall be kept in fixed deposit till the claimants reach the age of majority. A similar order was also passed in claim petition No.1235/03. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide a common order, the order dated 27.10.2006, the claim petitions have been decided. However, no directions have been issued by the learned Tribunal for disbursing of the interim amount so deposited in the fixed deposit. An application was moved by the petitioner for disbursal of the said amount. However, vide order dated 28.01.2005, the said application has been dismissed. Hence, this petition before this Court. Considering the fact that the two claim petitions have been decided, considering the fact that no clear directions have been issued with regard to disbursal of the fixed deposit amount to the petitioner, considering the fact that the 3 petitioner is an old women who has to look after seven minor children, it is in the interest of justice to direct that the amount so deposited in the fixed deposit shall be released to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In these circumstances, this writ petition is allowed. (R.S.CHAUHAN)J. Manoj Solanki +