IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 16TH MAGHA 1930 SA.No. 201 of 1996() -------------------- AS.235/1990 of DISTRICT COURT, THRISSUR OS.173/1970 of MUNSIFF'S COURT,CHAVAKKAD .................... APPELLANT(S): (APPELLANT BEFORE THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT- PLAINTIFF BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT) ------------------------ GOURY ANTHARJANAM, W/O.KADALAYI MANAKKAL MOORTHY NARAYANAN NAMBUDIRI, VYLATHUR AMSOM DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. BY ADVS. MR. T.KRISHNANUNNI, MR.P.V.RAMA WARIYAR. RESPONDENT(S): (RESPONDENTS BEFORE THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT-DEFENDANTS BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT) --------------------------- 1. LOUIS, S/O.MAROKKY CHAKKUNNY, VYLATHUR AMSOM, DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 2. THOMAS, S/O.MAROKKY CHAKKUNNY, ...DO..DO..... 3. MARY, W/O. PULIKKOTTIL CHACKKO, GURUVAYOOR AMSOM, MUTHUVATTOOR DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. 4. MARIYAM ALIAS LILLY, W/O.PULIKKOTTIL LAZAR, ..DO..DO... THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.N.Ravindran, J. ================== S.A. No. 201 of 1996 ===================== Dated this the 5th day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that notwithstanding the registered letter sent on 17.11.2007 which has been received by the appellant, the appellant has not furnished the correct address of the respondents or given instructions in the matter. The learned counsel submits that the appeal may be dismissed for non- prosecution. Ordered accordingly. The appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. P.N.Ravindran, Judge. ess