IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 21ST MAGHA 1931 Crl.MC.No. 224 of 2010 -------------------------------- [CMP.NO.12332/2009 OF JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, KARUNAGAPPALLY, CRIME NO.250/2009 OF THE CHAVARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT] .................... PETITIONER/INJURED: --------------------------------- ABDUL MANAF, S/O.ABDUL LATHEEF, MEENATHATHIL VEEDU, NETTIYADU MURI, PANMANA VILLAGE, EDAPPALLYCOTTA P.O., CHAVARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.C.RAJENDRAN. RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: -------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHAVARA POLICE STATION, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. NAZAR.S.U. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. P. BHAVADASAN, J. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= Crl.M.C. No. 224 of 2010 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= Dated this the 10th day of February, 2010 O R D E R This is a petition filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking further investigation into the matter. 2. The petitioner is the injured in Crime No.250 of 2009 of the Chavara Police Station. The crime was registered on the basis of the information given by his relative. The allegation is that on 20-4-2009 at 8 P.M. the petitioner was attacked by the accused person and his left hand was chopped off. He suffered injuries also. 3. The present complaint of the petitioner is that the police with ulterior motive laid final report only for offence punishable under sections 308 IPC whereas section 307 IPC will be attracted in the case. On the basis of this claim, the petitioner prays for a further investigation in the case. 4. The F.I.R. was registered on the basis of the information given by the petitioner’s relative. The police Crl.M.C. 224/10 2 report under section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code is only an opinion. There is no reason to believe that the court, which hold trial of the case, will not frame proper charge based on materials before it. Hence, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. mn.