Civil Revision No. 1185 of 2010(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 1185 of 2010 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 2.8.2010 Angrej Singh Petitioner VERSUS Gurdev Singh Respondent Present:- Mr.S.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Rajinder Singh Rangpuri, Advocate, for the respondent. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN,J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 25.3.2009 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muktsar, by which objection petition filed by the Judgment Debtor has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the total recovery is not more than 1 lac, whereas the value of the attached property is Rs.8 lac. He further submits that under Order 21 Rule 66 (2) (a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ( for short 'CPC')the Executing Court can attach and sell the property which is specified in the list furnished by the decree-holder. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent/Decree-holder has submitted that he has not been paid the amount so far. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that if the attached property is sold in court auction, the petitioner will not get the actual price. He has further submitted that in case his property is released from attachment, he would make the payment of the decretal Civil Revision No. 1185 of 2010(O&M) 2 amount within a period of three months from today. He, thus, prays that impugned order be set aside. The learned counsel for the respondent has not objected to it if the payment is made to him within three months as alleged. In view of the above submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to deposit the aforementioned amount with the trial Court to being paid to the respondent-decree holder within three months from today. In case, the petitioner fails to do so, the impugned order shall be automatically revived. Disposed of. 2.8.2010 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) Anoop JUDGE