IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRI. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.3 OF 2010. (SANTOSH KUMAR BHANUDAS DHAYE...VS... STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTH.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Petitioner in person. Mrs. K.S.Joshi, A.P.P. for Respondent/State. CORAM : A.P.LAVANDE & R.C.CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : APRIL 07, 2010. 1. The petitioner in person was heard for sufficient time. With his help we have tried to gather from the petition, which he has drafted without, possibly, legal assistance, to find out as to whether there is any act attributed to the respondents which scandalises or tends to scandalise, or lowers or tends to lower the authority of, any Court, or prejudices, or interferes or tends to interfere with, the due course of any judicial proceeding; or interferes or tends to interfere with, or obstructs or tends to obstruct the administration of justice in any other manner. 2. The grievance of the petitioner that the authorities in the Education Department and the Government Pleaders who conducted the matter on their behalf before the Court have mislead the Court, cannot amount to any of the items included in the definition of “Criminal Contempt” in Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. 3. The petition is thoroughly misconceived and it is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE RR.