IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1670 of 2010 Gorakha Prasad . Versus State Of Bihar & Ors. . ----------- 7. 13.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The order in the writ petition was for disposal of a representation only. That has been done and counsel for the State has produced an account payee cheque dated 9.7.2011 drawn on the State Bank of India in the name of the petitioner bearing no. 012351 for a sum of Rs. 2,83,732/-. The same is handed over to the counsel for the petitioner during the course of the proceeding. The additional grievance of the petitioner that he is entitled for further arrears and that the opposite parties have wrongly withheld the same by claiming adjustment when they have in fact already made adjustment are matters which requires further enquiry which is not possible in the contempt jurisdiction more particularly in the nature of the order passed for a disposal of the representation when even the details of the representation were not pressed. If the petitioner has any grievance his remedy lies in a fresh writ application only. The proceeding stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)