IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1771 of 2010 SUJEET YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 24.01.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioner, who has been declared juvenile in conflict with law, seeks bail in a case instituted under Section 302/34 of the Penal Code. Order dated 20.12.2010, would indicate the nature of allegation he is facing. By the said order a report was called for from the concerned Probation Officer which is placed at Flag-A. It appears therefrom the delinquency report of the members of the family is that one of the brothers of the petitioner has already been convicted and is in jail. Father of the petitioner is also facing charge so far as the present case is concerned. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to false implication in the case he is in custody since 06.04.2009. This Court has already noticed the observation of the appellate Court in order dated 20.09.2010. Having regard to the facts appearing from record including the allegations and the contents of the report of the Probation Officer, this Court, for the present, is not inclined to release him on bail. Prayer for bail is rejected. One of the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner is that the petitioner has remained in custody for more than 01 year 09 months. In that view of the matter, this Court 2 grants him liberty to approach the Court below for bail after 06 months from the date of receipt/communication of a copy of this order if the trial is not taken up for disposal. In that event the Court below shall consider and dispose of the application in accordance with law uninfluenced by the present order. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)