IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42956 of 2009 MANOJ SHARMA SON OF SIKANDAR SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.12.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the first information report was instituted 52 days later, even though the father of the informant has been named as one of the witnesses in the first information report and there is no explanation about the delay in lodging the first information report, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 18.11.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 3rd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Munger in connection with Sessions Case No.566 of 2009 arising out of Muffasil P.S.case No.207 of 2008, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail and (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in - 2 - any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )