IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3993 of 2011 LAXMAN PRASAD YADAV, S/O LATE RAM CHANDER YADAV. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. . ----------- 2. 04.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, as also the learned counsel for the informant. This court is not inclined to direct examination of the prosecution witnesses at the stage of recording the statement of the accused as pointed out by the lower court. The trial court has noted that the prosecution evidence was closed after all efforts made on production of the prosecution witnesses on 04.01.2010 and after one year of that order closing evidence of the prosecution the informant was approaching the court seeking issuance of summons to witness. The court does not find any merit in the petition. It is dismissed. Nitesh (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)