1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1950 OF 2010 Kisan s/o Apparao Sugave .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents Mr.P.B.Rakhunde, Advocate for petitioner Mrs.A.V.Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for respondents 1 to 3 and 5 Mr.U.B.Bilolikar, Advocate for respondent No.6 Respondent No.4 served CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND N.D.DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 9th August 2010 PER COURT : 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioner prays for issuance of a writ directing the respondents i.e. respondent No.2 to execute and implement the order dated 10.5.2006 passed in proceedings No.2005/JB/Desk/GPN/Appeal-1981. 2. Curiously, the petitioner has not annexed the copy of the order dated 10.5.2006 passed in the proceedings adverted to above. Despite that the petitioner seeks for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to execute and implement the aforesaid order. 3. On notice being issued to the respondents, learned Counsel for respondent No.6 states on instructions that the aforesaid order was the 2 order passed by the Collector, which came to be challenged before the Commissioner in appeal and the Commissioner allowed the appeal and remitted the matter back to the Collector for a decision afresh. After remand, the Collector by order dated 27.7.2009 has held that since the claim of the petitioner has been referred to the scrutiny committee, further orders in respect of the disqualification proceedings would be passed subsequent to the verification proceedings. Undisputedly, the petitioner was not a party to the proceedings before the Collector by which disqualification of the respondent is sought. 4. For the aforesaid reasons, we do not find any merit in the petition and the petition is, therefore, summarily dismissed with no orders as to costs. ( N.D.DESHPANDE, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) (vvr/1950.10wp)