IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DECEMBER 2007 / 14TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 35992 of 2007(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ PRASANNAN, BHARATHI NIVAS, MUTTAPALAM, PERUMKUZHI P.O., PIN 695 303. BY ADV. SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN SRI.M.R.SASITH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. CHIRAYINKEEZHU GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CHIRAYINKEEZHU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, CHIRAYINKEEZHU P.O. 2. MATHEW SAJI, AMBALAYAM, NEAR RAILWAY STATION, CHIRAYINKEEZHU P.O. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.35992 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 5th December, 2007 JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is that the 2nd respondent is making certain constructions in violation of Ext.P2 plan which has been approved by the 1st respondent-Panchayat and that the Panchayat is not taking any action though Ext.P3 complaint has been submitted to the Panchayat. I do not propose to go into the merits of the above grievance since Ext.P3 complaint is pending before the 1st respondent-Panchayat. The 1st respondent-Panchayat will take up Ext.P3, conduct immediate local inspection with notice to the 2nd respondent, hear the petitioner and the 2nd respondent and take a decision on Ext.P3. Decision as directed above will be taken at the earliest and at any rate within one month of receiving copy of this judgment together with a copy of the Writ Petition and all the exhibits. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE