1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 238 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6755 OF 2009 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Heard counsel for the parties. This contempt petition alleges disobedience of the order dated 4.12.2009 passed by the learned Division Bench of this court. In para 3 of the said order, it is observed thus:- “3. In case the petitioners’ representation/complaint is pending with the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad, we direct that the Chief Executive Officer shall pass appropriate orders on the representation/ complaint, after considering the record, and if necessary, after hearing the parties concerned, on its own merits at the earliest.” 2 Upon perusal documents at pages 25 and 26, it clearly appears that the directions contained in para 3 of the order of the learned Division Bench has been complied with by the respondent, Zilla Parishad. The grievance against those persons has been considered and it is mentioned at the bottom of the order that after hearing and discussion, necessary proceedings have been concluded. In the light of the documents at pages 25 and 26 of the compilation, I do not think that there is any contempt or disobedience committed by the respondents. If the petitioners is aggrieved by the subsequent action of the Zilla Parishad, he can file appropriate proceeding, if he is advised to do so. There is no substance in the contempt petition and the same stands dismissed. Notice discharged. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) Date:12.10.2010. rlj/