CWP No. 496 of 2008 6.11.2008 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. B.S. Kanwar, Advocate for respondent No.5. It is not disputed by the parties that before the Deputy Commissioner, Shimla and the Divisional Commissioner, Shimla, two income certificates of respondent No.5 have been produced. The certificate issued by the Naib Tehsildar, Nankhari reflects the income of Smt. Kiran Devi as Rs. 15,000/- per annum and the income certificate issued by the Executive Magistrate shows the income as Rs. 11,500/- per annum. There cannot be two income certificates issued by two separate authorities. In order to resolve this issue whether the income of Smt. Kiran Devi - respondent No.5 is Rs. 15,000/- or Rs. 11,500/- per annum, the Additional District Magistrate, Shimla is directed to hold an inquiry. The parties are directed to appear before the Additional District Magistrate, Shimla on 18.11.2008. The Additional District Magistrate, Shimla will hear both the parties and will also go through the evidence led by them before him. Consequently, in view of the variance in the two income certificates issued by two separate authorities, order dated 3.3.2008 is quashed and set aside. The Additional District Magistrate, Shimla shall furnish the report to the Deputy Commissioner, Shimla and thereafter, the Deputy Commissioner, Shimla shall hear the appeal afresh and will pass necessary orders within four weeks. It is represented that respondent No.5 is still working as Anganwari worker at Lauhati, Sub Tehsil, Nankhari, District Shimla. The respondent No.5 is permitted to discharge her duties till the adjudication of the appeal. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. November 6, 2008. (cr)