IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 23RD AUGUST 2007 / 1ST BHADRA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 966 of 2007() ----------------------------- CRA.153/2003 of II ADDL. SESSIONS COURT, TRIVANDRUM CC.1612/1998 of ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, TRIVANDRUM .................... REVN. PETITIONER: APPELLANT/ACCUSED ----------------------------------- BIJU PADMANABHAN, S/O.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, MANAGING DIRECTOR, TOUCH STONE ELECTRICALS PVT.LTD RESIDING AT TOUCH STONE APARTMENT, PUTHEN ROAD, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.D.SAJEEV RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE -------------------------------------------- 1. M/S.SREE VENKETESWARA ENTERPRISES, MARAKKADA ROAD, CHALAI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI.TIRUVADINATHA PILLAI. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.B.SREEKUMAR BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. K.S. SIVAKUMAR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Crl. R.P. No. 966 OF 2007 ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 23rd day of August, 2007 O R D E R The revision petitioner, who was the accused in C.C.No.1612/98 on the file of the CJM, Thiruvananthapuram for an offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the trial court for the said offence. 2. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter and have filed Crl.M.A.No.9042/2007 under section 147 of the Act for recording the composition entered into by them. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. The composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal within the meaning of section 320(8) Cr.P.C. Money, if any, paid by the revision petitioner pursuant to orders, if any, passed by the lower appellate court shall be refunded to the revision petitioner. This revision petition is disposed of as above. (V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE) aks