IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20471 of 2009 TRIPURARI PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 17.12.2009 Heard. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that to justify the act of her desertion, different allegations are made. Otherwise, the petitioner, a driver allegedly drunkard, how could be able to provide Rupees twenty five thousand to complainant’s father only to favour complainant’s bidai. Marriage is twelve years earlier. The case for restitution of conjugal right pending, filed on behalf of the petitioner justify grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of his arrest/surrender within one month from today, the petitioner, namely, Tripurari Pandey shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the SDJM, Sasaram (Rohtas), in connection with Complaint case No.1102/2006, subject to the conditions as laid down sunder Section 438(2)Cr.P.C. SKBOSE (Mandhata Singh)