1 ca1266.2011 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 1266 OF 2011 IN CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 26450 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICTION (ST) NO. 26451 OF 2010 WITH FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 26449 OF 2010 IN APPLICATION (WCA) NO. 17/B-1 OF 1995 Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ... Appellants Versus Smt. Alamelu Perumal Chinnu Kaunder and Ors.... Respondents Mr. Vinod Mahadik h/for Mr. R.A. Malandkar for the appellants. CORAM : SMT.R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED : APRIL 13, 2011 P.C. This Civil Application is for restoration of the First Appeal which was dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 28th October, 2010. The said order refers to nonproduction of certificate as contemplated by the third proviso to sub section (1) of section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1933 and permitted the applicant to produce the certificate on or before 29th November, 2 ca1266.2011 2010. On failure of production of the certificate, the application for condonation of delay was to stand dismissed without further reference to the court. At the time of the filing of the First appeal and application for condonation of delay, the appellant had produced receipt for the deposit of the entire decreetal amount. Therefore on 8th April, 2011 the office was directed to verify whether receipt of deposit of the entire amount of compensation with the Commissioner is sufficient compliance with the third proviso to sub section (1) of section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act. The office endorses that the production of receipt of deposit of the amount is sufficient compliance with the proviso. In that circumstances, application is allowed in terms of prayer Clauses (a) and (b). (SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J.)