/ b @ , b’fww IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR VERSUS / z 13 State ofChhattisgarh, Through — Deputy Director State Chhattisgarh Rajya Krishi Vipanan Board Aanchalik Karyalaya, Raiupr, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Balod, Distt. Durg ‘ (C.G.) 3. Chairman, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Balod, Distt. Durg (C.G.) RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / w.P.(s) No. 5gSH /2o10(s.B.) I» ( $3 . PETITIONER . 9/, Anil Kumar Thakur, S/o. 0N9”. \D/ \NA / fa? w maxg‘y Baliyar Singh, aged about 45 years, R/o Village Latabore, ...~3\‘::-4 Tahsil Balod, Distt. Durg (C.G.) W”! WWwPkgwomsa .{qgt 200 m W (Wu) Mmf‘awia; WWW mmm WW w"&’%z°tmm *aifawaném 3.8: HGN’BLE JUST!CE MR1 PF‘ITINKER DIWAKER 08-10‘2010: Shri Avinash Sahu, coun for the petitioner. s ‘l Shri V.V.S. Moorthy, Dy. A vacate General for the State. Grievance of the petitione is that Vide order dated 18.5.2001, he submits that there is no substantiai progress in the departmental e quiry nor in criminal case but yet the petitioner has not been re-instat . e Counsel for the petitioner ubmits that petitioner has already filed representation but no order has een passed on the same. He submits the ends of justice would serve i the petitioner is permitted to withdraw a fresh detaiied representation. He submits that direction may be ssued to the competent authority for deciding his representation expe itiously. State counsel has no obj ction if the petitioner makes any such representation and the same is b ing decided in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petitione is permitted to withdraw this petition i the eventuality of making any such was ptaced under suspension. this petition with tiberty to ma with the liberty as aforesaid. representation by the petitionet thin a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this or er, the same would be decided by the competent authority within a furt er period of three months. it is made clear that this ourt has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the au ority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation in acc rdance wiW// / Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge e _