1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. R.S.A. No. 41 of 2002. Date of decision: 26.12.2011. Chuharu Ram, Son of Nathu Ram, Son of Geharu Ram, R/o Village and Phati Naggar Kothi Naggar, Tehsil and District Kullu (HP). ....Appellant/Plaintiff. Versus 1. Smt. Chitra Devi, Widow of Laxmi Narayan 2. Rakesh Kumar, Son of Shri Laxmi Narayan 3. Chander Shekhar, Son of Laxmi Narayan 1-3 Residents of Village and Phati Naggar, Kothi Naggar, Tehsil and District Kullu (HP). 4. Smt. Pushpa Devi, D/o Laxmi Narayan, W/o Suresh, Son of Jagar Nath, R/o Village Phati and Kothi Jagatsukh, Tehsil Manali, District Kullu (HP). ....Respondents/Defendants . Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 C.P.C. against the judgment and decree of learned District Judge, Kullu, in Civil Appeal No. 14 of 2001 dated 10.10.2001 whereby he has confirmed the judgment and decree of the learned Senior Sub-Judge Kullu in Civil Suit No. 84 of 1999(1998) decided on 25.11.2000. __________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1 No For the Respondents : Mr. Parmod Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 3. None for respondent No.4. __________________________________________________________ Kuldip Singh , Judge (Oral). The sole appellant has died as per order dated 19.09.2011. Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, who earlier represented the sole appellant 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment ? Yes 2 has stated that nobody is responding to the communications he has addressed in the above appeal. No steps have been taken for bringing on record legal representatives of sole appellant. In these circumstances, the appeal stands abated. ( Kuldip Singh ), December 26, 2011. Judge. (krt)