WP(C) 2127/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI Heard Mr. F. K. R. Ahmed, learned counsel for the writ petitioners, and Mr. B. J . Ghosh, learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10. Heard also Mr. D. Saikia, learned Standing counsel, De partment of Finance, Government of Assam, appearing on behalf of respondent No. 2. There is no dispute that the facts of the present case are covered by th e order, dated 08.04.2011, passed, in WP(C) No. 2071/2011, and that the petition er’s grievance would be taken care of if similar directions are given in the pre sent writ petition, because the petitioner, too, has been working as a casual wo rker under the Hilakandi Zilla Parishad. The relevant portion of the order, da ted 08.04.2011, aforementioned reads as under: Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, it is he reby directed that the respondents, particularly, respondent No. 1, namely, Comm issioner, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Government of Assam, shall examine, or cause to be examined, the grievances of the petitioner and if the p etitioner is found to have been working as claimed by him, his name shall be inc luded in the accordance with the requirements, as have been set out by the lette r, dated 14.02.2011, aforementioned. The whole exercise, so directed, shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order b y the respondent No. 3. Whatever decision(s) is/are reached by the respondents, the same shall be communicated, in writing, to the petitioner and if the petiti oner feels aggrieved by the decision(s), which may be taken by the respondents/a uthorities concerned, the petitioner shall remain at liberty to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. The petitioner may furnish to the respondent No.1, namely, namely, Commissioner, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Government of Assam, a certified co py of this order along with a copy of this writ petition and annexure(s) thereto . Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, t his writ petition is disposed with the directions, which were passed by this Cou rt in its order, dated 08.04.2011, aforementioned, passed in WP(C) 2071/2011. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition stands di sposed.