IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 28TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 9TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 2054 of 2011(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- ANIL KUMAR, S/O.KUTTAPPA KURUP, SREEKANDA VILASAM, PARAYKKAD, AYRAKKUZHI P.O., CHITHRARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.LIJU. M.P RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KOLLAM DISTRICT, KOLLAM. 691013 2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, KADAKKAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 691536 3. SMT.SHANIJA BEEVI, MANZIYA MANZIL, PARAYKKAD, AYRAKKUZHI P.O., CHITHARA, KOLLAM. 691536 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MANGODE VILLAGE, KADAKKAL, KOLLAM 691536 ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: kp P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 2054 OF 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T Sri.P.P.Thajudheen, learned standing counsel appearing for the Kerala State Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as 'the Board' for short) submits on instructions that the dispute between the petitioner and the beneficiary namely, the third respondent was settled in the “Janakeeya Adalat” held on 2.2.2011. When the case was called on for hearing today, there was no appearance either for the petitioner or for the party respondent. In such circumstances, accepting the statement made by the learned standing counsel for the Board, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. P.N.RAVINDRAN, (JUDGE) vps WPC No./2011 2 WPC No./2011 3