1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3925 of 2006 [Ujjansingh Babusingh Rajput Vs. State of Maharashtra and others ] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND F.M. REIS, JJ. DATE : 27th August, 2009. 1. Heard finally with consent of Shri P.S. Khubalkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.P. for respondents. 2. We have perused the impugned order. The only grievance made by the learned counsel for petitioner is that the validity certificate of his blood relative namely Dr. Bhagatsingh Bhaulal Dyawane, has not been considered. The learned Assistant Government Pleader states that the petitioner has not cooperated at all with the Scrutiny Committee. 3. With the assistance of both the learned Counsel, we have perused the records. We find that the Police 2 Vigilance very perfunctory though names of other relatives are named in the said report, the vigilance cell authority has not taken pains to find out documents in relation to ancestors and those named blood relations. Similarly, merely because of refusal of petitioner to disclose old documents, the vigilance cell authority could not have stopped verification. 4. Shri Khubalkar, learned counsel argues that the vigilance cell report is in his favour. Learned A.G.P. however, states that the report is against the petitioner. 5. During hearing, the learned counsel for petitioner states that petitioner will produce necessary old documents of education or other entires of his blood relatives for verification by the Scrutiny Committee. We also find that certificate of validity issued to Dr. Bhagatsingh Bhaulal Dyawane, has not been looked into by the Scrutiny Committee. 6. In the circumstances, we quash and set aside the order dt. 10.07.1991 passed by the Scrutiny Committee and matter is restored back to its file for taking decision a fresh, in accordance with the law. The petitioner to produce necessary records before the said Committee by 29.09.2009 and shall remain present before the respondent Committee on that 3 date and shall abide by its further direction in the matter. The Committee to proceed further in accordance with the law and to adjudicate the caste claim of the petitioner as early as possible and in any case by 30.06.2010. Writ Petition is disposed of in above terms. 7. Rule accordingly. No cost. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd