IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-26547 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.3.2011 ... Padam Singh ................Petitioner vs. State of Haryana .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. J.S. Bedi, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Priyanka Dalal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Dr. Surya Parkash, Advocate for the complainant. ... K.C. Puri, J. Learned State counsel has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation. The allegation in the FIR is that the prosecutrix was married to the petitioner and inspite of decree of divorce, he has committed sexual intercourse with her. The decree of divorce under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act has already been passed, which is stated to be under challenge. At this stage, custodial interrogation is not required. So, the interim order dated 10.9.2010, passed by this Court is made absolute. ( K.C. Puri ) 25.3.2011 Judge chugh