: 1 : IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.2398 OF 1990 NO.2398 OF 1990 NO.2398 OF 1990 Bank of Baroda, Backbay Reclamation Branch .. Plaintiffs. Versus Smt.Neela Bhansali .. Defendant. None present. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. : V.C.DAGA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 13th December, 2007. : 13th December, 2007. : 13th December, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. By an order dated 10th September, 2007, issues were framed. Plaintiffs were directed to file affidavit of evidence and documents on or before 1st November, 2007. Inspite of lapse of more than one and half months, the order dated 10th September, 2007 has not been complied with. There is nothing on record to show that the affidavit of evidence and documents has been filed by the plaintiff. Today, neither the plaintiffs nor their Advocate is present. Suit is, therefore, dismissed for want of evidence with no order as to costs. (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA, J.) DAGA, J.) DAGA, J.)