•kl; ®1 S3 E91 ft '[E-t :^ 3S St » ij© i "^yi •"^ WS5. s^s I M; :.?1': '-• ftiiAs^ KKSS g:SJ'!|^lj iijl ms< :M?fc*'£iSi» ••w^falK'G>'w s-s wi- [^MSSt'fS.,. :®;.&'r::;w::@;®': (Q.CQ.O.;(i!t^.|S| l.^'rti^BS^^^ sjiil8i; m'w^-f^^, '& :' »: w^%i^@^ •B3 > aa ISiiSgBBI jl«l:B Nsr.s'"::':ws-»ias ^•-•..^iiSllMl 3i^ IK"'ffi siw s&^ t-);@^~» M.E1!%> ESE6"1 1 V^f^. f*...^i /1^° HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTM, J. WMT PETITION (S.) N0.2360 OF 2005 Petitioner Shiv Nath Kishore Chandravanshi versus Respondents StateofM.P.and others Present : Mr. Alok Nigam, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER »ft (Passed on 7" ofSeptember, 2006) It is submitted that the facts and question of law involved in the present petition are same to that of in Ram Sahay Jha vs. State ofMadhya Pradesh and others (Original Application No.15/1995). The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, by its judgment and order dated 16-2-1996, allowed the application of the petitioner therein. Leamed counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to approach the respondents/State for consideration and disposal of the petitioner s -••^ /rL-\ case in terms of the order dated 16-2-1996 passed in the case of Ram Saltcy Jha (Supra) by Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur- 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondenfe/State fairly agrees with the submissions made by leamed counsel for the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberiy to make a representation before the respondents - State Authorities for their decision on the representation in the light ofthe order dated 16-2- 1996 passed in the case ofRam SahayJha (Supra), in accordance with law, on its own merit, within reasonable time. 4. With the above-stated liberty, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per rules.