IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.4171 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.4171 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO.4171 OF 2008 1. Balu Sahebrao More, 2. Sukhdev Kundalik Salunke, .. Applicants. Vs The State of Maharashtra, Respondent. Mr B.A.Aloor, for the applicants. Mrs P.P.Shinde, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 02/12/2008 DATE : 02/12/2008 DATE : 02/12/2008 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard Mr.Aloor, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms.Shinde, learned APP, for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.17 of 2008 of Paud police station, Dist-Pune. The said crime has been registered against the applicant and two others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 394,427 read with 34 of IPC. 3. The prosecution case is that the present applicants and accused no.2 Rahul Bhoigad robbed a truck and took away mobiles instruments worth Rs.15-16 lacs. The mobile instruments worth Rs.13,82,714 have been recovered from applicant no.2 and mobile instruments worth Rs.2,17,260/- have been recovered from applicant no.1. Keeping that in view and having considered overall facts and circumstances of the case, in my opinion, there is sufficient material on record to connect the applicant with the alleged offence. Hence, the application is rejected. . While rejecting this application I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case without being influenced by the observations made in this order. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)