IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 4538 of 2004 (O&M) Gurbaksh Singh ...Appellant vs Shiromani Gurudwara Parbandhak Committee and another ..Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. D. S. Dadwal, Advocate for Mr. Vanita Sapra Kataria, Advocate. Mr. Sukhbir Singh and Mr. S. K. Gupta, Advocates for respondent no. 1. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Advocate for Mr. M. K. Singla, Advocate, for respondent no. 2. ... Rajesh Bindal, J. Mr. D. S. Dadwal, Advocate submitted that as per information received by him, the appellant has expired. A perusal of the file shows that the issue involved in the appeal is pertaining to recovery of ` 11,210.30. The Sikh Gurdwara Judicial Commission, Amritsar (for short, 'the Commission'), had accepted the petition filed by respondent no. 1- Shiromani Gurudwara Parbandhak Committee for recovery of the aforesaid amount from the appellant. The recovery from the appellant was stayed on 1.10.2007. Learned counsel for respondent no. 1 fairly submitted that considering the fact that the appellant has expired, the respondents will not press for the recovery of the amount for which an order has been passed by the Commission in favour of the respondents. In view of the aforesaid stand of the respondent, the present appeal is disposed of. 22.2.2011 (Rajesh Bindal) vs Judge