1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2540/2011 ( Madhav R. Gawande and ors. .vs. State of Mah. And ors. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. S.A. Marathe, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. A.S. Sonare, AGP for Respondents. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : JUNE 07, 2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGP for respondents no.1 to 3. It is apparent that the challenge to the alleged application of new rule for determination of seniority is pending before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal is said to have rejected interim relief but then in petition the disclosure is of not granting interim relief. The rejection is not pointed out. The prayer clause also does not challenge any orders passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The impugned communication dated 21.4.2011 shows that some of the employees had lost their seniority and hence their original date of entry into service did not remain relevant. The Department, therefore, wanted to revise the seniority list and has invited objections from aggrieved persons. The 2 petitioners can, therefore, raise their objections to this exercise and if such objections are raised, the Department is under obligation to consider it. Hence at this stage, we do not see any prejudice as such being suffered by the petitioners and the matter is seized of by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. We are not inclined to entertain the petition. Writ petition is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE JUDGE halwai