IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5787 of 2002 with SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5517 of 2002 with SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5619 of 2002 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? --------------------------------------------------------- POHIN CHANDAN SHER Versus CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 5787 of 2002 MR BR GUPTA for Petitioner No. 1 MR AK CLERK for Respondent No. 1 2. Special Civil Application No. 5517 of 2002 MR BR GUPTA for Petitioner No. 1 MR AK CLERK for Respondent No. 1 3. Special Civil Application No. 5619 of 2002 MR BR GUPTA for Petitioner No. 1 MR AK CLERK for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE B.J.SHETHNA Date of decision: 31/07/2002 COMMON ORAL JUDGEMENT #. It is heartening to note that respondents have in letter and spirit complied with the interim order passed by this court in favour of the present petitioners as well as other similarly situated students also. Public advertisement was also issued in local Gujarati newspaper "Sandesh" dated 26.6.2002, to that effect is placed on record by Mr.Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned counsel Mr.Clerk states that in view of this nothing survives in these matters and according they are disposed of. #. Before parting, I must place a word of appreciation for the respondent-University and its advocate Mr.Clerk appearing for taking constructive approach in the matter. With these petitions are disposed of. Rule discharged. No costs. (B.J.Shethna, J.) *Pvv