1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 139 OF 2009 ( Chunnilal Kothuji Bansod Vs. Moreshwar Arjun Bahale & Ors. ) ........................................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................................ Shri Mirza APP for non applicant/State. CORAM: M.L. TAHALIYANI J. DATED: 5th APRIL, 2011. . Learned counsel for the petitioner absent. Learned counsel for respondents 1 to 5 absent. Learned APP is present for State i.e. respondent no.6. Criminal revision application challenges the judgment and order passed by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge Yavatmal in Sessions Trial No. 27 of 2008 dated 27.04.2009. The said order runs as under: “The accused Nos. 1 to 5 are acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 147, 148, 302 read with Section 149 and 307 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code under Se4ction 235(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Accused no.1 is in jail since 19.11.2007. issue his release order accordingly. The bail bonds of accused nos. 2 to 5 shall stand cancelled. They are set at liberty. 2 The muddemal produced before the Court vide O. P. No. 87/2008, being worthless, be destroyed, after expiry of appeal period. Pronounced in open Court.” It is brought to my notice that the State of Maharashtra had filed application for grant of leave to appeal against the said judgment and order in Criminal Appeal No. 155 of 2010. This Court by order dated 06.08.2010 (Coram: A. P. Lavande & P. D. Kode JJ.) has passed the following order: “Thus considering the evidence adduced by the prosecution, the view taken by the learned trial Judge is a probable view. In view of the same, we are of the considered opinion of no case being made out for granting leave to prefer an appeal as sought by the appellant/State. Hence, we dismiss the application and consequently the appeal.” In view of the finding given by the Division Bench I do not think anything survives in the present revision. It needs to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE svk