IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 215 of 2004 (M/B) 1. M/s New Laxmi Stone Crusher, through its Proprietor Smt. Chanda Devi, W/o Sri Ram Teerath. 2. M/s Veer Sri Traders, through its Proprietor Smt. Usha Rani, W/o Mr. P.C. Jain. 3. M/s Gupta Stone Crusher, through its Partner Nitin Gupta, S/o Sri Vinay Kmar Gupta. 4. M/s Himalayan Stone Crusher, through its Proprietor Sheela Devi, W/o Sri Ram Avatar. 5. M/s Jain Trading Company, through its Partner Anshu Jain, S/o Sri Ashok Kumar Jain. 6. M/s Sri Ram Stone Crusher, Unit II, through its Partner Yogesh Sharma, S/o Sri Somdutt Sharma. 7. M/s Laxmi Stone Crusher, through its Partner Chandragupt, S/o Sri Ishwar Dayal. All petitioner no. 1 to 7 R/o Haridwar Roorkee Road, Tehsil Jwalapur, District Haridwar. ........ Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Chief Secretary, Industrial Development, Uttaranchal Shasan, Dehradun. 2. Chief Secretary and Commissioner, Forest and Village Development Branch, Uttaranchal Shasan, Dehradun. 3. District Magistrate, District Haridwar. 4. Uttaranchal Environment Conservation and Pollution Control Board, Uttaranchal, District Dehradun, Through its Member Secretary. ......... Respondents Mr. Jagdish Prasad Bisht, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sharad Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for respondents Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No. 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr. Jagdish Prasad Bisht, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sharad Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for respondents Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No. 4. 2. Mr. Jagdish Prasad Bisht, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition, now, has become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 16.06.2006 16.06.2006 G