1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.1433/2002. : : Chattar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. : : Date of Order 21.11.2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr.Ashish Saxena for the petitioner. Mr.Hemant Gupta, Addl.Govt.Counsel for the State. This writ petition, in my considered view, is wholly misconceived because the respondents before giving charge- sheet to the petitioner or placing him under suspension are not required to give him opportunity of hearing. Such a mandamus would also be out of scope of Article 226 of the Constitution of India because no rule or law requires that even before the respondent decides to initiate disciplinary proceedings by issuance of charge-sheet, either at the time of initiation of such proceedings or in contemplation thereof, or place its employee under suspension such action should be preceded by an opportunity of hearing. In any case, this Court need not dwell much upon this issue any longer because the respondents have not so far taken any action 2 against the petitioner. Having regard to the facts of the case no order is required to be passed. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ)J. A.Arora/- Item No.23.