1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.07.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.8231 of 2011 M.S.Muthuraman ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai District. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Annanagar Police Station, Madurai, Madurai District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Annanagar Police Station, Madurai, Madurai District. 4.Rajapandi, The Inspector of Police, Annanagar Police Station, Madurai, Madurai District. 5.Bose, Writer, Annanagar Police Station, Madurai, Madurai District. 6.S.Muthuraman ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take necessary legal action against the respondents 3 to 6 and directing the respondents not to harass the petitioner in any way whatsoever in any manner. For Petitioner ... Mr.R.Manoharan For Respondents ... Mr.M.Govindan, Special Govt. Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.T.Lajapathy Roy for R6 ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take necessary legal action against the respondents 3 to 6 and also directing the respondents not to harass the petitioner in any way whatsoever in any manner. 2. Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3. Mr.T.Lajapathy Roy, learned Counsel takes notice for the sixth respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. In view of the order which is going to be passed, notice to the respondents 4 and 5, is dispensed with. 4. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 5. At the time of hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that no relief is sought for as against the sixth respondent - defacto complainant. 6. As far as the main grievance of the petitioner is concerned, it appears to be the highhandedness on the part of the fourth respondent at the time of investigation and the petitioner has given a complaint to the first respondent. In the typed set of papers, the petitioner refers to a complaint dated 19.07.2011, but the person to whom it is addressed is not clear. 7. In view of the above, the petitioner is given liberty to make a proper complaint to the first respondent - Commissioner of Police, who shall consider the same in accordance with law. 8. Giving liberty as above, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. SD ASST REGISTRAR ( CRL SIDE ) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR rsb To: 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai District. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Annanagar Police Station, Madurai, Madurai District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Annanagar Police Station, Madurai, Madurai District. 1CC TO MR. I. MOHAMMED SIRAJ, ADVOCATE, SR: 25046: 1CC TO MR. T. LAJAPATHI ROY, ADVOCATE, SR: 24908: 1CC TO THE SPL. GOVT PLEADER SR: 24996: DM::2011:AUGUST:03:: W.P.(MD)No.8231 of 2011 2P:7C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/