Mgn CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.9776 OF 2009 Shri Rajan B. Pednekar..Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors...Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court's or Judge's orders appearances,Court 's : orders or directions & : Registrar s orders . : ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Amit Borkar, for the Petitioner. Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, AGP for respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 6. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 30th November, 2009. P.C.: Contention urged by the petitioner is that the Directors of the Co- operative Bank are neither necessary or proper parties for the complaint filed before the Consumer Forum. The Consumer Forum has rejected that application. Against that order an Appeal lies before the Appellate Forum. 2. The petitioner has come by way of writ of prohibition. In our opinion an authority exercising quazi judicial powers has a right to decide as to whether the parties before it are proper or necessary. Any order passed will be subject matter of Appeal and cannot be a subject matter of writ of prohibition. With the above observation Writ Petition dismissed. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)