WP(C) 4416/2008 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr. AR Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. DK Dey, learned Central Government Counsel, for the respondents. The petitioner is before this Court being aggrieved by the order dated 15.09.200 8 transferring her from CISF Unit, BRPL, Bongaigaon to CISF Unit, Oil India Ltd. , Duliajan. In terms thereof, she is supposed to be relieved on 30.09.2008, sub ject to the submission of clearance certificate for all concerned by 28.09.2008. According to her, she has submitted a representation on 15.09.2008 before the Director General, CISF, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi through proper channe l for reconsideration of the order of transfer on the ground that her daughter i s scheduled to appear in the Final HSLC Examination slated for May, 2009. The p etitioner has contended amongst others that the representation remains unattende d till date. Mr. Sikdar, while reiterating the above, has also pleaded that in terms of the o ffice order dated 22.10.2007 (Annexure 5 to the writ petition), the petitioner o ught not to be transferred as her daughter is in the midst of the current academ ic session and is supposed to appear in a Board Examination in 2009. Mr. Dey, sought time to obtain instructions. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and bearing in mind the constra int in the scope of interference with an order of transfer, this Court in the fa cts and circumstances of the case, considers it apt to dispose of this petition with a direction to the Director General, CISF, Force Head Quarter New Delhi, Lo dhi Road, Central Govt. Office Complex, New Delhi to take an appropriate decisio n on the petitioner’s representation abovementioned within one week from the dat e of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner would furnish a copy of th is order to the Commandant CISF Unit, BRPL, Bongaigaon within a week herefrom fo r onward dispatch thereof to the aforementioned authority for doing the needful. For a period of three (3) weeks herefrom, the impugned order of transfer would not be given effect to. No costs.