IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46297 of 2007 1.PRAMOD KUMAR @ MANTU son of Chandrika Paswan 2. Chandrika Paswan son of late Bhagat Paswan 3.Amod Paswan @ Amod Kumar son of Chandrika Paswan 4.Kamleshwari Devi wife of Chandrika Paswan 5.Anita Devi wife of Ashok Paswan. All resident of village-Bari Esupur, P.S.-Industrial Area, Hazipur, Dist.-Vaishali. Versus 1.STATE OF BIHAR 2.Radhika Devi D/o Nandu Paswan, village-Gurmian, P.S.Hazipur Town, Dist.-Vaishali. ----------- 5. 15.3.2010. Heard Mr. Amarnath Jha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.S.K.Thakur, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. The petitioners have challenged the order of cognizance dated 29.11.2006 passed in Industrial Area P.S. Case No.315 of 2005 (G.R. No.1878 of 2005) whereby the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, has taken cognizance of the offence under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this case a compromise petition was filed by opposite party no.2 before the court below and, as such, he makes a prayer to withdraw this petition to approach the court below for filing an appropriate petition. Prayer is allowed. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file an appropriate petition before the court below at an appropriate stage. If such a petition is filed, the court below may examine the petition on its own merit without being prejudiced with this order. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.) 2