IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24824 of 2008 Between: Shaik Adam S/o Yakub Sab Door No.13-1-66 Behind Old Rasoolpet Police Station Rasoolpet,Guntur District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt of A.P Rep.by its Chief Secretary Govt of A.P Secretariat,Hyderabad 2 The Principal Secretary (Home Department) Govt of A.P Secretariat,Hyderabad 3 The Superintedent of Police Guntur District 4 The Inspector of Police Guntur Rural Circle Taluka Office Compound Guntur District 5 The Sub Inspector of Police Peddakakani Police Station Guntur District 6 The Director Central Bureau of Investigation New Delhi Govt of India New Delhi .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SYED KHADER MASTAN Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 5:AGP FOR HOME ORDER: In this writ petition, the sole grievance of the petitioner is the alleged failure of the police in completing investigation and filing charge sheet in Crime No.211 of 2005. In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.5, it is inter alia stated that a detailed investigation conducted into the said crime revealed that the complaint of the petitioner was purely civil in nature and accordingly, a final report was filed before the Court of VI Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Guntur, on 06.12.2008 referring the case as civil in nature. This averment is not controverted by the petitioner. In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to file a protest petition before the jurisdictional Magistrate. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.32411 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 3rd JUNE, 2009. kvni