C'/-1 crv/l /-- t©nch IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION (S) N0. S66^ OF 2009 PETITIONER Bhupati Ram Chaini S/o Late Shri Madhusudan Chaini, aged about 6© years, Retired Lecturer R/o ^ Rambhantha, Raigarh, Tahsil and District Raigarh C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENTS ,.A^ .^^-' <^^"^ ^••".^•fylff-"' ^^^^' ^•- ^v 1. State of C.G., Through: the Secretary, Education Department, DKS,Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Joint Director, Accounts Treasuiy and Pension, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. The District Education Officer Raigarh C.G. 4. The Principal Government Higher Secondary School Mahapalli, District Raigarh C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER INTHE LIKE NATURE ETC. . MAYTHIS PLEASETO YOUR LORDSHIP, The humble petition of the petitioner named above most respectfully showeth: - 1. PARTICULARSOF THE PETITIONERS. As mentioried in thecausetitle. 2. PA'RTICULARSOF THERESP0NDENT. 131 .ijgjii.B. —78 3)1^11 ^iT WII 311^1 ,7y(3 11*1CTI th*l<eta 'S^ "41^1C1<1, »Tll-H'l<o, [slCII'H^ _..^^1^..M^^ 3II^?F'q^7 (li4ij«l<«r) TOIIW Tifei 3nt?t SE ^^ic *:y^. K^y ?E Bis^^'B.^s.n. &s*s' r.j^H. I¥H.^u^s.E^a? r'HUHi^) ^^ ff.'f ^fc^j Shri.Rakesh Pandey cou| Shri Symesh Bajaj GA fori At the' out' set counsei for vviihdraw this petifion with Hberty No.3. He a!sd seeks a directionl representation of the petitioner at of the petitfone!';is squarely cover^c No. 4797/2004. State counse! submits that statement before this Court wheth4r the order passed in aforementione4 if the petitioner makes a represent^t decided strictiy in accordance with Accordingly, fhe petitlon is. aforesaid. !f the petitioner makssl within a period of one month from f the same is expected to be_decicie|:i frorn the date of its receipt. It ;s made clear that this Cosli the case and the authorities representation of the petition®.1'stricfc! *w!rt'i1-i 'wraf ^f fs^t <r^i<4i< ^ sifiro 3iit?t ise! for the petitione! jhe petitioner submits that he vvants to |make a representation to respondent to respondent No.3 for deciding fhe ^n eariy date as according to h!m case jd with the order passea' in \.vrif petifion at this stage he can not maks any case of the petitioner is covered with writ petition. However, he submits that [tion to respondent No.3, same shail be lavi/. ^smissed as withdrawn with iiberiy as a representation to resgondsnt No.3 ^se date of recsipt of copy of fhls order, within a further period of two monfhs Irt has not commented on the merits of j;oncerned are free to decide the Py in accordance with law. .^^^ ^s