1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2936 of 2009 (Mansiram S. Atram v. The State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri N.B. Bargat, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri T.R. Kankale, AGP for R- 1 to 3. Ms P.V. Yerlekar, Advocate for R- 4. Coram : R.C. Chavan, J. Dated : 24 th July, 2009 The original complaint on whose complaint the licence of respondent No.4’s father was cancelled by an order by the District Supply Officer and confirmed on an appeal by the Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati, takes exception to the order by the Minister on revision under Clause 16 of the Maharashtra Scheduled Commodities Retail Dealers’ Licensing Order, 1979, whereby the Minister set aside cancellation of licence and instead directed imposition of fine of Rs. 10,000/- plus forfeiture of security deposit for the licence as also recovery at the rate of Rs. 38/- per litre for kerosene allegedly sold by respondent No.4’s father in open market. 2 I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. He could not show as to why the Minister could not have passed such an order on revision or how the discretion exercised by the Minister was unwarranted. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Judge. pdl