THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO C.R.P.No.191 OF 2011 ORDER: This Revision is directed against the order passed by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge at Sattupally, Khammam District, in E.A.No.45 of 2010 moved in E.P.No.6 of 2010, which was taken out for executing the decree passed in O.S.No.62 of 2000. The petitioner is the decree holder. He filed the application for grant of police aid to implement the decree of the Court. The suit was decreed granting permanent injunction against the defendants in the suit with regard to the suit schedule property. In spite of the decree, the respondent / judgment debtors are alleged to be interfering with his peaceful right and possession of the suit schedule property by obstructing the decree holder from undertaking agricultural operations. Therefore, he moved the present E.A. The learned Junior Civil Judge has rightly pointed out that the remedy open to the petitioner is to take out an application under Order 21 Rule 32 or, in an appropriate case, even an application under Order 39 Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure, but not to move an E.A. under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner decree holder would submit that the main E.P. itself has been pending and it would be appropriate if the executing court takes up the main E.P. and passes appropriate orders thereon at the earliest. The learned counsel for the respondent does not oppose the said idea. This request of the petitioner deserves consideration. It would be more appropriate for the executing court to deal with the E.P. as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and pass appropriate orders thereon. The Revision is, otherwise, merit less and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ------------------------------------ Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J mrk 17h November 2011