IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2308 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- SENDHAJI SOMAJI VAGHELA Versus AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORP. THROUGH MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 2308 of 1996 MR KS ACHARYA for Petitioner No. 1 M/S ANAND ADVOCATES for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE SERVED BY DS for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD Date of decision: 26/03/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard learned advocate Mr. K.S.Acharya on behalf of the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. D.C.Raval appearing on behalf of the respondent Corporation. 2. When the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned advocate Mr. Raval placed on record the order to the effect that the grievance which has been raised by the petitioner in the present petition is already satisfied by the Corporation and necessary payments which are available to the petitioner has been paid by the Corporation. Therefore, learned advocate Mr. D.C.Raval submitted that now no grievance survive, as already satisfied by the Corporation. Therefore, present petition is disposed of accordingly as no further order is required. Rule is discharged. Interim relief, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated. (H.K.Rathod,J) Jayanti*