@f MM H!G COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILAéPUR $INGLE BENCH: Hon’bie Shri SR. Nayak, CJ N WRIT PETFHQM Ne. 13YG QF 1999 Shakti Pictures Circuit Ltd” A Limima‘ Ccmpany, Amravatf Through :Chairman: KM. Rathi AmaravaEi: Unit Amer-Deep Taikies Raipur (MP) Versu$ ‘ 1. Rent Controiiing Authority Ra€pur (MP) 2. Secretary, Dudhadhari Shri ishav Nyaa Va Samiti, Shaskiya Samkit Mahavidyaiaya. Raipur (MP) ' ‘ Mr. Manindra Shriastava, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashish 3hr§vastavsz and Amn’ic 3&3, ieamed counsei for ihe peiéoner. Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, iearned Govt. Advocate for the State/respondent No. 1. Mr. RN. Jha. Ieamad counsel for respondent No. 2. ORAL DRDE§ (Passed on 8 0f December 2M5) The actian of the Rem Controlling Authurity, Raipur, First respondent herein in enhancing‘the rent payable in respect of the subject premises of whieh the petitioner is tenant, is cailed in question mainly on the ground that the order was made by the first respondent at the instance of the second respondent, the tend owner without notice to him anti without giving him any opportunity of being heard as required under H PETlTlOMER RESPONDENlB r Presant: v tt r1, Sectien 30 o,‘ the C.G. Accemmadation Ccntro! Act. Nthough, the second respondent has tiled statement of objections to the writ petition, the above , specific allegation made by the petiticner is not denied. What is stated in the statement of objection is that the petitioner was aware of the proceedings. Resp‘ondent No. 1 has also not filed any statement of objections. There is no good reason for the Court to doubt the integrity of the sworn statement made by the petitioner, particularly, at this distance of time. ”3' ji (2) In that View of the matter, the writ petition is aliowed. The impugned order is quashed. The application filed by the second respondent-owner shall stand remitted to the first respondent and the first respondent is directed to dtseose of that appitoation, strictly in accordance with law and after notice to the petitioner and after giving him reasonable oeportunity of being heard. There shall be no order as to costs. Sdl- Chief Justice l‘y,Z. L ;t to “e n