1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 1016 OF 2010 (Kailash Namdeorao Gaonar .v. President, Shikshan Prasarak Mandal) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri S.R. Narnaware, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri C.S. Kaptan, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 27TH JUNE, 2011. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks protection of his service on the basis of the Government Resolutions dated 25.05.1990 and 30.06.2004 and also in terms of the judgment in Writ Petition No. 2044 of 2004 dated 17.09.2004. The reliance placed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner on the judgments in the cases of Punjab National Bank and another .v. Vilas Govindrao Bokade and another reported in 2007(3) Mh.L.J., 805 and Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad .v. State of Maharashtra and others reported in 2010(4) AIR Bom R 48 for seeking protection of his service, is not well founded and the relief sought by the petitioner by this writ petition cannot be granted to the petitioner. It would be necessary for this Court to follow the law laid down by the three Judges' Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India .v. Dattatraya Namdeo Mendhekar and others, reported in 2008(2) Mh.L.J., 720 and the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Ganesh Rambhau Khalale .v. State of Maharashtra and others, reported in 2009(2) Mh.L.J., 788 and dismiss the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.