1 caf1728 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1728 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.846 OF 2011 Nirmala Virji Dangodara ...Applicant vs. Zenal Construction Pvt.Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Sumeet Jagtap i/b M/s.M.P.Vashi & Associates for the applicant Mr.Abdul Rab for respondent no.1 Mr.Vinod Mahadik for the respondent no.2-B.M.C. CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JULY 1, 2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the first respondent and the learned counsel for the second respondent. There is no dispute that during the pendency of the suit, there was interim relief granted in terms of prayer clauses (b), (c) and (d) of this application. Hence, the same interim relief deserves to be continued. 2 Hence, application is disposed of by passing the following order : i) Interim relief which was operating during the pendency of the suit will continue to operate till the final disposal of the Appeal. ii)Grant of interim relief will not prevent the second respondent from initiating appropriate action in accordance with law. iii)Grant of interim relief will not prevent the first respondent from filing appropriate proceedings in the Court of Small Causes. JUDGE