IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 23596 of 2007 Between: B.Venkateswara Reddy, S/o B.Venkata Reddy, R/o H.No.40-814-7B, Srinivas Nagar, Kurnool, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District, Kurnool. 2 The Station House officer, IV Town P.S., Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3 S.Khaleel, S/o S.Ibrahim, r/o Indira Gandhi Nagar, Behind Padmasri School, Kurnool, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CHILAMKURI HANUMANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondent No.3: ---- The Court made the following : O R D E R: This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner feeling aggrieved by the inaction of respondent No.2, in registering a case and taking appropriate action against respondent No.3 on his complaint dated 07-10-2007. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. I have perused the record. In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.2, it is inter alia averred that the complaint of the petitioner was registered as Crime No.284 of 2007, for the offences under Sections 506 and 509 IPC, on 07-11-2007. It is further stated that the investigation taken up in the case revealed that the petitioner has duped respondent No.3 and many others, by styling himself as a journalist, and collected huge amounts by promising valuable house site plots to be registered in their favour. It is further stated that as the victims have started demanding repayment of money, the petitioner gave a false complaint against respondent No.3 and that no prima facie case is made out against respondent No.3. Respondent No.2 further stated that he will file final report before the jurisdictional Magistrate in accordance with law. No reply affidavit is filed controverting the above averments contained in the counter-affidavit. Inasmuch as the Crime has already been registered and investigation has been done into the same, the grievance of the petitioner is redressed leaving no scope for passing any further order in this Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.30731 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 15th June, 2009 lur