IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.4897 of 2009 Decided on : 28.08.2009 Vijay Kumar & others ... Petitioners versus Tara Chand & others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Sumeet Goel, Advocate for Ms. Manjari Nehru Kaul, Advocate for the petitioners. 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This revision petition has been filed against the order dated 07.08.2009 whereby the evidence of the petitioners (defendants in suit) has been closed by the Trial Court on the ground that no evidence had been led despite four opportunities had been awarded. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the case is fixed for 01.09.2009 for rebuttal evidence and prays for one opportunity to the petitioners for leading their entire evidence on the said date on their own responsibility. In my opinion, it would be in the interest of justice if the petitioners are allowed to lead their entire evidence on their own responsibility on the date fixed viz 01.09.2009. Consequently, this revision petition is allowed and the Trial Court is directed to allow the petitioners to lead their CR No.4897 of 2009 -2- evidence on their own responsibility. August 28, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE