3.wp.1923-10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.1923 OF 2010 Indus Towers Limited and others. ..Petitioners. Versus Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation & others. ..Respondents. ... Mr.V.V. Tulzapurkar, Sr. Advocate a/w. Mr.Amit Jamshendekar & Umang Jajoo, Advocate i/b. M/s. D.H. Law Associates, for the Petitioners. Mr.A.A. Garge, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr.S.N. Patil, AGP, for Respondent No.4. ... CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : MARCH 10, 2010. P.C. 1. The learned Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3, after taking instructions from the Corporation, states that the towers in relation to which the petitioners have made applications for permission / renewal / regularization and which are pending before the Corporation, no orders adverse to the interest of the petitioners will be made by the respondents without granting the petitioners an opportunity of being heard. He further 3.wp.1923-10 2 states that till the orders are made and communicated to the petitioners and for a period of two weeks thereafter in case the orders are adverse to the interest of the petitioners, no demolition / disconnection of the towers shall be carried on. Thereafter, the respondent shall be free to take action in accordance with law. He further states that so far as those towers in relation to which so far no applications have been made by the petitioners are concerned, the petitioners can make applications within a period of one week from today. He further states that if, as alleged by the petitioners, applications are not accepted by the concerned officer, then the petitioners can submit the application to the Commissioner and intimate about it to me (advocate). In relation to such applications, the same procedure, as stated above, would be followed. Statement is accepted. In view of this statement, no orders are necessary in the Petition. Petition is permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of as such. (D.K. DESHMUKH,J.) (A.R. JOSHI, J.)