IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7835 of 2008 Between: Smt.M.Indira W/o.M.Sudershan Goud H.No.4-7/8/P, Venkateswara Colony, Mamidipally Armoor, Nizamabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, General Administration (Law and Order II) Department, Secretariat at Hyderabad. 2 The Collector and District Magistrate, Medak District at Sangareddy. 3 The Superintendent of Jail, Central Prison, Chanchalguda, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, directing the respondents herein to produce M.Sudershan Goud, now detained in Central Prison, Chenchalguda, Hyderabad before this Hon'ble Court and he may be ordered to be released forthwith after declaring that his detention is illegal and void and passsuch other or further orders as are necessary. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.GANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORDER: (per Sri A. Gopal Reddy, J) Smt. M. Indira, wife of M. Sudershan Goud, the alleged detenu filed this writ petition challenging detention order dated 18-03-2008 passed by the Collector and District Magistrate, Medak District at Sanga Reddy, the 2nd respondent herein in proceedings Rc.No.B3/103/2008 under Sections 3(1) and 3(2) read with Sections 2(a) and 2(b) of the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986. When the writ petition is taken up for admission, learned Advocate General submitted that when the matter has been placed before the Advisory Board, the Advisory Board has not confirmed the detention order and ordered for release of the alleged detenu and accordingly, he has been released. Recording the submission of the learned Advocate General, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. A.GOPAL REDDY, J B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J 01-05-2008 ks ………... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 Secretary, General Administration (Law and Order II) Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat at Hyderabad. 2 The Collector and District Magistrate, Medak District at Sangareddy. 3 The Superintendent of Jail, Central Prison, Chanchalguda, Hyderabad. 4 2 CCs to the Advocate General, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad (OUT). 5 2 CD copies.