1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 8. RA/49/2010 In MCA/6/2009 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. H.F.Pawar, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. Vivek Bhavthankar, Adv., for the respondent. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:5-3-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard. The order dt.4th Jan.,2010, passed in Miscellaneous Civil Application No.6/2009, is sought to be reviewed. According to Mr.Pawar, HMP No.29/2008, filed by Smt.Anjana before the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Biloli, itself is without jurisdiction and, consequently, not maintainable and hence this should have been a point to be considered by this Court while deciding Miscellaneous Civil Application. 2. I do not agree to the 2 learned Counsel. The petition was based on the ground realities. The petition in terms of Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act is at Biloli while another HMP moved by the husband is at Aurangabad ( No. 382/2008). The order specify, the HMP moved by the husband, being petition No.382/2008, is to be taken before the the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Biloli to be tried with H.M.P.No. 29/2008. This answers the objection raised by Mr.Pawar that the H.M.P. under Section 9 of the wife is entertained by the Civil Judge, Junior Division. No flaw in the order. Review petition dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/49-10ra