THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 755 of 2010. Smt. Krishna Nautiyal W/O Shri Ram Gopal Nautiyal. … Petitioner. Vs. Director Dairy Development Department Haldwani and another. …Respondents. Mr. Ravi Babulkar, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. N.P.Sah, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.1. Date August 28, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Stay Application No. 7256 of 2010) Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider the selection/appointment of the petitioner on the posts created vide order dated 30-1-2002 and as per the conditions thereof. Petitioner has further sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to implement/follow the order dated 21.05.2009 and pay the honorarium as directed vide order dated 21.5.2009. The petitioner claims that he was appointed as Sachiv of Malti Samiti under Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Ltd. Uttarkashi in the year 1996 on fixed honorarium per month. Subsequently, the petitioner was promoted on the post of Group Sachiv. The petitioner also claims to have completed graduation in the year 2001. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is entitled to the benefit arising out of order dated 30-1-2002(Annexure- 3) whereby certain posts were created by the Dairy Commissioner and the petitioner is also eligible for appointment against those posts. In the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner urged that the petitioner may be given liberty to make a representation before the authority concerned and the authority 2 concerned may be directed to decide the same in the light of the Order dated 30-1-2002/1-3-2002(Annexure-3). Prayer is innocuous. Accordingly the petitioner is given liberty to make a fresh representation before the respondent no.1 and may take all the grounds therein, which were raised in the present writ petition, for redressal of his grievance within a period of two weeks from today. The Director concerned shall decide the representation of the petitioner by a speaking and reasoned order thereafter within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order along with the representation and shall consider the issue whether the petitioner is entitled to get the benefit of Order dated 31-1-2002/1-3-2002 (Annexure-3 to the petition). With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP