1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.575/2010. (Shri Shekhar R. Makasare -: versus :- Sau. Veronika Shekhar Makasare ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 06, 2010. Heard Shri M.P. Karia, learned counsel for petitioner and Shri Khare, learned counsel for respondent. Shri Karia, learned counsel states that the respondent – wife had already taken treatment from Psychologist, a qualified medical practitioner and as she is denying the said treatment, her fresh examination has become necessary. He contends that the Doctor who has examined her has expired. Shri Khare, learned counsel points out that the application before the trial Court is not supported by any affidavit and these avertments are missing in it. His contention is a false story is being pressed into service before this Court. Shri Karia, learned counsel points out that evidence of petitioner husband is already over and in that evidence, a suggestion was given to him to have himself 2 examined from a qualified Psychologist. I do not find it necessary to go into all this. The question whether respondent – wife has undergone any such treatment, can be ascertained by the trial Court, if that question falls for consideration before it. If while examining this question the trial Court feels that any of the parties should be medically examined, in its own wisdom and as per the settled law, the trial Court can also consider that examination. I am not inclined to interfere with the matter at this stage in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is therefore, disposed of no costs. JUDGE Rgd.