IF THE PTG Oil?? OP URflflfl AT q*ijsi t D’TED rm ““ 3RD biT OP ASIL lqo9 BWRE THE ‘O”BIk “.JUS”1OS •ç5’q*Ty’ tTT !‘IC” “flS,11397e30fl/O K.’?armyana, Sb VUanp Pon3erl, Thovoor “oure, ?Fqr lore. 2. Thlakriehnn. t /o Sun4°r°, MaFtli Crose, yost. Mangalore. ‘. K.Jatiriidiq Sheritf, 5/0 X.V.SherifP, ‘ear Balanehrq p001., Kanrknedy, Mangelore • ‘pmmisrp (By Sri B.G.Rafluran, ldvoc’te At • The KBflJ, fl.S.Bldr, Raw’lore—1. ty it• Treslfting Officer. The RTA, I K, Yanralore by its Seoxetry ‘)ESPO’tTlt!S (3y Sri M.B.Pret eke , HOG? I Thie writ tetitior ‘1s riev te. c ‘77 of the Constitu+io ‘sf t ’3io rryinz tn quash t’±e or4er 4 t 4fle3.1q9 0’ P.i vj’le Annexure -A. T”is tebition qJjç on for pralliq!r°n hecrinp this Vy flia Crurt riMe tIe VflflnWipS: ORDE H Mr.M.B.Prsbhakar, 2erned BCG Is directed isO t’ke notice for t 1 e respon dent 2. Heard VrRahuram, 1erne counsel for the petitioner, He subwits tat 1e may be peitted to roduce the ve)iclee in cues,ion before te II respondent nd liberty may he reserved to the II respon dent to examine te vehiol in respect of the feasibility and the fitness of the vehicles, The contention of Mr.Rghuram is that the authority has lredv riven te fitness certificateewbich wifl expi on 13-i99, 30—3—199q ed 21Oqq, 3, Heard !r,Prbhakar, learned T P, 4, in view o’ these fitness certificates, the pctitionere are permitted to tke their veMelee before the T respondent and t II repo ie ft jq at libetv to exa inc the vehicles nd if ‘e is stisfied, he ay permit the petitioners to onerte. e With the ebove obeerv’tion, te writ jetitione are diepoeed of. Pr.Prbhakar, ‘earmd CGP is peraitted to file memo or appernoe within 2 weeke. ) Sd! JUDGE akc/