IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2008 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1930 W.P.(C).No. 14173 of 2008(K) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- PUSHPARAJAN, CHARUVIL PUTHE VEEDU, MULAVANA P.O.,KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,KOLLAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. K.R. DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 14173 OF 2008 - K = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 3rd day of June 2008 J U D G M E N T Against Ext. P1 order rejecting the application made by the petitioner for grant of a regular permit, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Tribunal as M.V.A.A. No. 472/07. The appeal was disposed of by Ext. P2 judgment directing to grant regular permit subject to settlement of timing. The complaint in this writ petition is that since then there has not been any progress in the matter, as a result of which the permit granted is not issued. 2. Taking into account the submission made as above by the learned counsel for the petitioner, I feel, the 1st respondent should implement Ext.P1, and timing also should be settled. The process shall be completed by the respondents as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 3 months of production of a copy of this judgment. 3. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE jan/-