IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1162 of 2002 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- LEGAL HEIRS & REP. OF DECD. TRILOKSHANKAR REVASHANKAR Versus LEGAL HEIRS AND REP. OF DECD. KAMLASHANKAR REVASHANKAR DAVE -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Civil Revision Application No. 1162 of 2002 MR AM PAREKH for Petitioner No. 1-1/2 .......... for Respondent No. 1 M/S THAKKAR ASSOC. for Respondent No. 1/1 RULE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent No. 1/1-1/5 RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 1/6-1/5 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 13/04/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Ms.Sapna Bahel for Mr.A.M.Parekh, learned advocate for the petitioner states that the parties have settled their dispute inter se. She has placed on record copy of the consent terms submitted before the trial Court as well as consent decree passed by the trial Court in Regular Civil Suit No.118/2000. It is submitted by her that now the original suit itself has been settled, therefore, she wants to withdraw this Civil Revision Application. 2) Permission to withdraw this Civil Revision Application is granted. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Application is disposed as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. No costs. (P.B.Majmudar,J.) /malek