IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52356 of 2008 DILIP KUMAR @ PAPPU MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 12.02.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the period of custody is more than the period of misuse though that was the stage of evidence but in any case petitioner’s further custody cannot be justified. Petitioner is in custody since 09.09.2008 after voluntarily surrendering. Taking that into consideration, petitioner is granted bail. However, petitioner’s absence for a day without reasonable cause shall make a ground for cancellation of the petitioner’s bail so granted. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court-4, Samastipur in connection with S.T. No. 96 of 2005/95 of 2007 arising out of Tajpur P.S. Case no. 205 of 1999. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)