IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5802 of 2011 1. INDU DEVI 2. Rukmini Devi ……………………….. Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.04.2011 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioners being the wife of the elder brother and the mother-in-law are apprehending their arrest in a case initially registered under Sections 324, 326, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and after death of the victim the case has been registered under Section 304B IPC. The accusation against the mother-in-law is of having poured kerosene oil when the husband lit fire. The accusation against Indu Devi is that she has illicit relation with the husband and she assisted other accused persons. Since there is specific accusation against the petitioner no. 2 this Court is not inclined to grant her anticipatory bail. The application on behalf of petitioner no. 2 is rejected. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners used to reside separately from the husband. The accusation of pouring kerosene oil and litting fire being against the mother-in-law and the husband, let petitioner no. 1 Indu Devi, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM Chapra in connection with Banipur P.S. No. 2 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Snkumar/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)