THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1327 of 2004 ORDER: The petitioner was engaged as Driver on N.M.R. Basis in respondent No.1 Corporation on 20.01.1989. He claimed regularization of his services in terms of various orders passed by the Government from time to time. In fact, he approached this Court by filing W.P.No.7145 of 2001 seeking such a relief. It is only when C.C.No.869 of 2001 was filed that the respondents came forward with the plea that the case of the petitioner was rejected through proceedings, dated 27.06.2001. The petitioner challenges the said order. Heard Sri R.N.Hemendranath Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.R. Balarami Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The respondents do not deny the fact that the petitioner was engaged by them as N.M.R. employee. It is also a fact that there exist schemes for regularization of N.M.R. employees. However, much would depend upon the existence of vacancies and eligibility of the persons. Through the impugned order, respondent No.1 has informed the petitioner that following the directions issued by the Government for restructuring its establishment, it has decided to reduce the existing staff and has also introduced voluntary retirement scheme to minimize the expenditure. When such is the case, the question of regularizing the services of N.M.R employees does not arise. The petitioner is not able to demonstrate that any of the facts mentioned in the impugned order are not correct. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 23.12.2010. kdl