1 APPR304.10 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 304 OF 2010 IN CRI. REVN. APPLICATION (ST) NO. 456 OF 2010 Nandan Raman Kayastha ... Applicant v/s Sau.Reena Nandan Kayastha ... Respondent Mr.Nitesh Bhutekar for the applicant. Ms.Lalita Panchakshari for the respondent. CORAM: R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED: 26TH APRIL, 2011 P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for both sides. 2. Looking to the facts appearing in the application, I am inclined to allow the application by putting the petitioner costs of Rs.5,000/-. Hence, the following order is passed:- (i) The criminal application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2 APPR304.10 (ii) The petitioner to pay to the respondent costs of Rs. 5000/-. 3. After this order is passed, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that she has received costs of Rs.5,000/- on behalf of the respondent. 4. In view of the above, the office to process the Criminal Revision Application (St.) No.456 of 2010 and place it for admission as per its turn. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) 3 APPR304.10