IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.697 of 2011 SURAJ MANJHI, son of Prameshwar Manjhi Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 10.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No.115 of 2010 registered under Sections 395 and 397 of the I.P.C. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., but during the course of investigation petitioner was arrested on 06.7.2010, and allegedly, two stolen mobiles were recovered from his possession. The submission of learned counsel for petitioner is that as a matter of fact one set of mobile had been purchased by the father of the petitioner from Sahara Phonex, Kothwara, Dobhi, Gaya which is evident from Annexure-2 to this bail petition, and so far as second set of mobile is concerned the same had been purchased by the petitioner, but the purchase receipt of the aforesaid mobile has already been lost. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent. Considering the facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties petitioner, namely, SURAJ MANJHI is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sherghati (Gaya) in connection with above stated Barachatti P.S. Case No.115 of 2010. PN ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)