WP(C) 3440/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B D AGARWAL The writ petitioner is challenging the Judgment and Order dated 03.06.2011, pass ed by the learned Member, Foreigners Tribunal, Goalpara, in FT Case No. 1208 (G) of 2006. By this impugned Judgment, the Tribunal has declared the writ petition er as post 1971 Foreigner. Heard Sri A M Barbhuiyan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri M Bhagabati, learned CGC appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 1 . Also heard Sri J Sarma, learned Government Counsel appearing for the responden t Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5. Sri Barbhuiyan, learned counsel submitted that the impugned orde r has been passed ignoring the evidentiary value of land documents for the year 1965 and subsequent documents on untenable and extraneous grounds. The learned c ounsel also submitted that since the petitioner had migrated from East Pakistan to India prior to 01.01.1966 there was no necessity of registration of his name in the Citizenship Register as per Section 5 of the Citizenship Act. After going through the documents filed by the writ petitioner i n the Tribunal, I am of the view that it is a fit case to re-examine the petitio ner’s evidence. Hence, the impugned Judgment is set aside. The Tribunal is direc ted to pass a fresh judgment after giving another opportunity for hearing to the writ petitioner. The proceeding should be decided within a period of 3 (three) months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to appear before the Tribunal within a period of 2 (two) weeks from today. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition stands dispose d of.