HI^ COURT OF CHHAT7IS&WH AT m.ASPUR Petitioner-s W. P.IS} No. 2625 of 2007 1. Versus Respondents Romanuj Taram Aged about 37 Years, 5/o. Shri Alharam Tamn Assistait Teaeher, Primcry School ©otpur 2. Roman Rom Satam Aged about 43 Years, 5/o. Shri Tulsi Ram Salam Assistant Teacher, Primtry School Vorchegondi 3. Nathiram Sdiu Aged Aout 39 Years, S/o. Shri Jailal Sdiu Assistant Teoeher, Middie School Purichariana 4. Rakesh Kumar Netam Aged d>out 47 Years, S/o. Shri Ram Sunder Netam Assistait Tescher, Pr'imary Schoot Bhoiradih, Ail are at Block Kmker, Distt. Kanker (C.fi.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education Deportment, D.K.S. Bhwim, Raipur (C.6.5 2. The Direcfor Public Iretruction Deportment Raipur (C.@.) 3. Oistrief Edueaton Officer Kanker Oistrict Kanker (C.©.) 4. Btock Educotion Officer Konker (c.e.5 5. Treasury & Funds bepartment Kanker(C.S.) Writ Petition ynder Article 226 of the Con.stitution of India SB; Hon'ble Shri Justice Satish K. Agni^wtri. Presenti Mr. D.N. Prajapati, Advocate for the petltioners. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lowyer for the State/respondents. OR&ER (Passed on this 1" Day of May, 2007) 1. Jhe question of Iflm involved herein is asto whether the petitioners ore entitled to regulw pey scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the dote of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsel appeoring for the petitioners as well as for the St«rte/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of iaw involved in the present writ petition are the same as to thot of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/20)6 (Sushil Tlwari and others vs. Stcrte Sovernment of Chhattisgorh & others), which was allowed vide order dorted 7.11.2006. Ah<^h 3. In vtew of the above-stated sAmissions made by Isamed eounsel for the parttes, •the writ petition is allowed in the s<roe terms. No order os to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge