IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.613 of 2010 RAM VINOD ACHARYA SON OF LATE RADHA KANT ACHARYA, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR. 2. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME (POLICE), GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, DARBHANGA. 5. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DARBHANGA. 6. SUB-DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, BIRAUL, DISTRICT DARBHANGA. 7. OFFICER IN CHARGE OF BIRAUL POLICE STATION, DISTRICT DARBHANGA. 8. HAIDER ALI SON OF MAKBOOL HASSAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BAGHRASI, P.S. JAMALPUR, DISTRICT DARBHANGA. 9. LALAN KUMAR SINGH SON OF RAMJIVAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BAGRASI, P.S. JAMALPUR, DISTRICT DARBHANGA. ----------- 2 21.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Biraul P.S. Case No. 159 of 2009 is not being properly investigated nor the available articles are being seized which is kept in the shop in question. Learned counsel for the State submits that the matter is in dispute between the petitioner and the respondent nos. 8 and 9. Considering the submissions of the parties, it goes without saying that notwithstanding any dispute between the petitioner and respondent nos. 8 and 9, the 2 investigation of Biraul P.S. Case No. 159 of 2009 must be carried out expeditiously without unnecessary delay. In case, the petitioner has got any grievances with regard to the investigation, it will be open for him to bring it to the notice to the concerned Superintendent of Police. The writ application stands disposed of. Amrendra/ (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)