HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 361 of 2008 Petitioner Versus Respondente 1. 2. 3. 4. Wdyacfhar Patel, S/o Late Harishchandra Patel, Aged about 40 years, Assistent Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Baraliya, Block Educataon OfRce: Raigarh, Distt: Raigahr (C.G.) G3' State of ChhatBsgarh, Through : The Secretary, School Educational Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Public Instruction, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, District Raigarh (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Block - Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITOIN UNDERARTICLE 228 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF INDIA Single Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri D. R. Patei, Advocates for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Pane! Lawyer for the respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on this 17th day of January, 2008) The petitioner was appointed initially on a fixed pay of Rs. 1200/-. The petitioner was thereafter, granted regular pay scate on completion of the probation period. The question of taw invoh/ed herein is, asto whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of inffia! appointment or from the date ofcomptetion ofprobation period. Leamed counsef appearing for the petitionsr as well as learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State jointiy submit that ttie facts and quesBon of law, jnvoh/ed in ttie present writ petition, are the same asto that of in W.P.(S) No. 7240/20CS (Ku. Neel Kusum Ekka Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others), which was ailowed vide order dated 3.1 .2007. In view of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is atiowed in the same terms, subjectto verffication ofthe facte. No order asto costs. 3. Thakur Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge