MC 1573/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Banik, learned counsel for the applicant. The applicant, who is the respondent in RSA 50/2009, has prayed for a direction to the respondents to pass necessary orders in the application dated 21.2.2011 f iled by the applicant before the Tinsukia Development Authority praying for rene wal of the permission for carrying out the construction work in the upper floor of the building. According to the applicant, the Chairman of the Tinsukia Development Authority v ide communication dated 7.3.2011 refused to consider the said application due to the pendency of the case between the parties. According to the applicant there is non-consideration of the relevant materials made available before the Chairma n of Tinsukia Development Authority. The Tinsukia Development authority being the authority within the meaning of Art icle 12 of the Constitution of India, the applicant if aggrieved, can challenge the said order in the appropriate forum. The Misc. case stands disposed of.