T T C F {ry^ /. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G^ w.p. fs^ NO. 4-^i /-2^0^ 2^c/2 PETITIONER: ^'....< ^OJV<^ '<°'•/' \^ .....•- ^" RESPONDENTS Mohat Ram Patel, S/o Shri Motichand Patel, aged about 48 years, Upper Division Teacher, Government Middle School , Munund, Block- Dharamjaigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department \/^ D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) *' The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) Block Education Officer Dharamjaigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) W RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA ^i^i'^Ti^w ^TO ^T^T ^^ *11*1CT8 CT»*88<3ft ^sr T^i<4i(rt^, yxn-yKo, f®i(ni'y^< ^,?.lS?..1>l'.:...^&.^8.^200 31T^T XR'5F (ltGli^<sl^) ^TTW^f?^ 3?it¥I S.B: Hon'bje Justice Mr. Pritinkfer Diwaker 25-08-200S: Mr. Anil Mourya, counsel fcjr Mr«Pankaj Shrivastava, Ps|r Counsel for the petitioner ^i case is squarely covered with No. 813/2007 {Ram Kumar Sahp another}. He further submits that| he may be permitted to withdrawnj representation before the to be decided expeditiously. Counsel for the not make any statement as to wh| with the order passed in afore| However, he submits that If the authority concerned, the same !aw. Accordingly, the petition is aforesaid. If the petitioner concerned within a period of four| this order, the same is expected) three months from the date of its t^i^f^i<fli 'RR^ti ^ fe%t <r^^i< iF3tfw 3TT^T |r the petitioner. Psjnel Lawyer for the State, (ubmits that according to the petitioner his the| decision of this Court passed in W.P. (S) & others. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & in the light of the judgment of this Court, I the present petition with Slberty to make a responcpent No. 3 and the same may be directed usly. respondenps/State submits that at this stage he can i^ther the case of the petitioner is covered jnentioned identicai v^rit petition or not. [petitioner makes a representation to the stfall be decided strictly in accordance with maKes .dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as a representatlon to the authority |weeks from the date of receipt of copy of to be decided ^vithin a further period of rjsceipt. It is made clear that this c()urt has not expressed any oplnion upon the merits of the case and the ai|thorities concemed wouid be at iiberty to decide the representation strictly ifi accordance with iaw. , - ' Sd/- pritink'.erDi^ak^ judge