^ t." ^^ y .\. ^ i-"" l \ ^ <^ CLTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH SECOND APPEAL No. i-^ /2008 APPELLANTS (Plaihtiffs) ^"'" ^^^"J^k ^^'n '" '..s-<'^^ aA..••••"" RESPONDENTS (pefendants) ^' ^.^ ^^ ^v ^.\^ Santurara Satnami S/o Sahdeo aged about 51 years. 2, Kera Bai Satnami W/o Santuram aged about 45 lyears. Both cultivators and resident of village Karniandih Tahsil Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS \^ Reshmlal Satnami S/o Budhari, aged about 36 years. 2. Sanjay Satnami S/o Kosainlal, aged about 30 years. Kuldeep Satnami S/o Kosamlal aged about 28 years. All above the cultivators and resident of village Karainandih Talisil Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) (^- C.R. 2- ^4. The State of Chhattisgarh through the Collector Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) CLAM VALUED IN APPEAL AS IN THE ORIGINAL SUIT CLAIMED FOR DECLARATION, PERMANENT INJUNCTION CONSEQUINTIAL RELIEF OF POSSESSION AND DAMAGES VALUE AT Rs.2560 AND COU^.T^EES OF ALL Rs.319/- (THREE HUNDRED NINTEEN) ANNEXED. SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ^.. <<1> HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPELLANTS (Plaintiffs) RESPONDENTS (Defendants) SECOND APPEAL No. 48 of2008 Saiituram Satnami & anofher. VER8U8 Reshamlal Satnami & Others. 8ECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SB: Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. Present: Shri C.P.Sahu, Advocate for the appellants. Shri Sanjeev Agi'awal, Paiiel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.4. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 09th day of July, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appeaiing for the appellants seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this appeal. 2. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed as wifhdrawn. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Gowri