1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6504 OF 2010 Shaikh Majeed Akbar .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents Mr.C.V.Thombre, Advocate for petitioner Mr.S.K.Kadam, A.G.P. for respondent No.1 Mr.U.B.Bondar, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr.A.R.Nikam, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND N.D.DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 28th July 2010 PER COURT : 1. This is a petition which questions the rejection of the application of the petitioner for being appointed as a Shikshan Sevak. The claim of the petitioner was not considered by the respondents on the ground that the petitioner, who claimed reservation from sports category had not submitted the necessary certificates. This position is undisputed. In fact, the representation submitted by the petitioner clearly indicates that the petitioner had not annexed the certificates. In that light of the matter, therefore, no fault can be found with the approach of the authorities in not considering the petitioner for being appointed as a Shikshan Sevan from the category of sports persons. If that be the case, the petitioner has absolutely no case. 2 2. In that light of the matter since there is no merit in the petition, the petition is summarily dismissed with no orders as to costs. ( N.D.DESHPANDE, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) (vvr/6504.10wp)