IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43847 of 2010 ANANT MEHTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 18.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. For discrepancy in stock and distribution, submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner’s license is suspended, may be convicted also after trial if the discrepancy is not sufficiently explained but refusal of anticipatory bail at the stage is not justified. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner for bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Madhepura (Bharrahi) P.S. Case No. 334 of 2010 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhepura subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)