v» ^'^^. &.J 'yff' S^=- ^yo IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.V WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^T'O/7 OF 200$ 7 PETITIONER \^^.> ^ c '• ( ^>_'..*° ^/,-Avi' ..••f'" '^''-ri^'"...--"" A^* .*''*' ^6'.&.-""' i..^"' -/- Premlal Chauhan Son of Shri Dukalu, aged about 36 years, Presently posted at Govt. Primary School Basti Saraipali, Block Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^-1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The District Education Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.). The Block Education Officer, Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. 7^ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPL» SIN6LE BENCH : HObrBl.E A , SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRrr pErmoN (s) NO. 507 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versus Premlal Chauhon State of Chhattisgarh ond others WRIT PETTTrCWM (s) N0. 510 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Dilchand Chauhon State of Chhatt-isgarh and others WRTT PETTTION fa) N0. 519 OF 2007 Petittoner versus Respondents Surendra Kumar Bishal State of Chhatt-isgarh and others WRTT PETmON (s) N0. 521 OF 2007 Petjtioner versus Respondents Ramlal Sahu State of Chhattisgarh and others wprr pErmoN fsi NO. 522 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Reaiondents Topsingh Patel State of Chhatt-isgarh and others And WRIT PETmON (s) N0. 523 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Respondents Bhanupratap Sidar State of Chhatt'isgarh and others Present : Mr. P.P. Sdiu, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Satish 6upta, Dy. 6ovt. Advocate for •the State/ respondents. OR 0 E R (Pas«don -this 29th day of January, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as wetl as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by •the decision of -this Court- in the case of Yashwant Kwiw Bharadweij vs. Mimieyal Corpwwtion, Dwy and anothei^. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court- in the matter of yadiHWit l^imar fficuw£hva/(,Supra).subjectto verifiaition of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.T.I. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circutars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 ond further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record in connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge 1 2006 01) WJK-C6 96 Babtu