IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 12525 of 2008 Decided on: 20.7.2011 Roop Lal and another …Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioners : None. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate . General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2 . . None for remaining respondents. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner No. 1 has expired during the pendency of this petition. No steps have been taken to bring on record the legal representatives/heirs of deceased petitioner No. 1. Petitioner No. 2 is served. However, neither he is present in person nor represented by any Advocate. 2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge July 20, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?