t* cw IN THE HIGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR y CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITIONNO.^L</^- /2003 ^ PETJTIONER Dalbir Singh, S/o. Shri Jangsai Thakur, Aged about 56 years, ^ R/oVUlage Sitapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) RESPONDENTS ^ •'^^^3'^' ^•v^6w1v<^Qy" •^' ^e' VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through-the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, RaipurfC.G.) Coniinissioner Tribal Welfare Deptt. Raipur (C.G.; Principal, Govt. Girls Hr. Sec. School, Sitapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Director, Schedule Castes & Schedule Tribe, Welfare Deparbtnent Raipur (C.G.) A.K.Sahu, Aged about 48 years, S/o Unknown, R/o Punaradhyayan Kendra, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur. Principal, Model Higher Sec. School, Baikunthpur,Distt. Korea(C.G, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA T sii^rqii h-u^ OTI 311^1 W* k"~-..-^ ^A^- NINCTI «»NI<»1 75T "4i<fi<n^, aTilwic, fs|ff|iy^< v^. f' t-16,2-i( t^ri<t6e^ ::t-W(200 3II^?T 'T??T (yit^q^) WIRR ^ifei an^t 29-08-200; Heard Shri Manoj Parai(jape, counsel for the petitioner. By this petition under the petitioner has challenged been Transferred 'from W Secondary Schoo! Baikunthpu|-. Learnedcounsel for th| Teacher of S^ciology and h^ Higher Secondary School, A^ that school.for Sociology sulj will bs affected. In this re| Schooi, Sitapur has madtfa r^ Srievance of 1+ie petitioner is| trorisferred pn that postds l^ petitionar submitted that accpmmodute ihe responden representation raising his grie 'it*I4ld^i'l ^wv^ "^f "fex^ <(::<>i<^i'<, ^ <t1'ffl*1 dtl^t Article 226/227 of the Constitution sf India, the order dated 02-07-2003 wherebv he has her Secondary School, Sifapur- to Higher 2 petitioner submitted thut the petitioner is a is theonly Teacher of 5ociology in Sitapur 'ter his transfer there will be no Teacher in iject and 1+iereby the career of the students spect, the Principal of the Higher Secondsry :pr%sentation to the fiover'nment. The second 1tiat in -riie Schooi at BaikunThpu", in which he has been transferred, earlie^ one A.K. Sabu, the respondent No.5, was e had not joined on that post. Therefore, the petitioner has been transfer|red on that post. Learnsd counsel for ths this transfer has been made just to No.5. Legrned counsel for The petitioner further submitted that +l|ie petitioner wants to make a detaik /ances to respondent No.2. //'' '• XI-HC-22 sn^Ri^i (t{-11.'* atliSl ^M ,f-.- - y: ! .'SN'STRRT'T, 'Si'tftenre, Ksii^s'1 an^ 1ii^^^^^^^^^^^ .^.....M.^M:12^ NIICTIW^I'st) 2BO'S> ftre^sT' an^i'swtwaiN ~ ELh ^:;: couhse Hovinq heard learned the facts duid circumstances of! d detailed rep"<esen+ation within a period of 10 days fron( the ..representation and declde the date of receipt of reDresen) raisiha. thut-till theapppopriate order i of the transfec order of l+iepe^ With tiiis observation the In view of this order alSQ stonrf.disposed of. Parties are ehtitleci 'for -tn *w(<-fi(t-i NiwT"?ft^ <ft]'yi< ^s ^iT^ sn^ , for the petitiooerandhavingrGgard to ^ [the case, the petitioner is allowed to mdke ^ dil his grievances to pespondent No.2 t today and responcfent No.2 shall consider -^ ?fte same withln a period of 30,days from i tation in on objective manner.It is directed | i^ passed by respondent No.2 the operation 1 •^tionsr shall remain stayed. petition stands disposed of. 1V.P.No.222Z/Z003 and I.A. No.2427/2Q03 ^•c^rtified.copy df •riie order. Sd/- LC.Bhadoo judge [Sft^tM ^