CWP No.6889 of 1990 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.6889 of 1990 Date of Decision: 28.4.2010 Harbhajan Singh ……Petitioner VERSUS The Punjab State Tubewell Corporation Ltd. ……Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- Present: Mr. D. V. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shivani Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.S. Gill, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R.K. Dhiman, Advocate for the respondent. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. Mr. D.V. Sharma, Sr. Advocate assisted by Ms. Shivani Sharma states that despite of the order dated 15.2.1990 passed by Managing Director that whenever the posts shall be available for posting of Diploma holders J.Es as A.Es out of their quota, they shall be given promotion, respondent have not granted promotion to the petitioner as yet. 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the respondent fairly stated CWP No.6889 of 1990 -2- that if promotion is not granted to the petitioner as yet despite of order dated 15.2.1990 (Annexure P-9), the same shall be granted to the petitioner within two months from today. He further states that petitioner’s case about the promotion from back date with all consequential benefits shall also be considered as per the rules and regulations of the department. 3. In view of the statement made by learned Senior Counsel for the respondent, Mr. D.V. Sharma, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner states that present petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement made by learned Senior Counsel for the respondent. 4. In the light of the statement made by learned Senior Counsel for the respondent, present petition is disposed of. ( ALOK SINGH ) 28th April, 2010 JUDGE ashish