IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39450 of 2008 1. RAJ KUMAR MAHTO,S/o Late Devraj Mahto, 2. Ramanand Mahto, S/o Guni Mahto, 3. Phenku Kamkar, S/o Mushan Kamkar, 4. Rama Kamkar, S/o Pujan Kamkar, 5. Verma Kamkar, S/o Late Kundan Kamkar, 6. Rameshwar Yadav, S/o Nathu Yadav and 7. Janak Choudhary, S/o Late Anurag Chaudhary, all residents of Village – Ram Gadhwa, P.S. Kuchaikot, District Gopalganj. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 26.11.2008. Heard. In the event the complainant has obtained the sale deed of the land, being the subject matter of the complaint, from the true owner, the petitioners by creating no document can affect the complainant. The complaint being such which has been directed to be registered as F.I.R. under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, I think the petitioners, who have obtained land on the strength of grant by Bhoodan Yagna Committee are entitled to be accorded the privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is accordingly allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender of the petitioners within six weeks from today, let the petitioners, namely, Raj Kumar Mahto, Ramanand Mahto, Phenku Kamkar, Rama - 2 - Kamkar, Verma Kamkar, Rameshwar Yadav and Janak Choudhary be released on bail on their furnishing bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Kuchaikot P.S. Case No. 31/2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. dk ( Barin Ghosh, J. )