IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2011 / 19TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26386 of 2011(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. LIMITED STOP AND FAST PASSENGER ASSOCIATION, PADIYATH BUILDING, THALAYOLAPARAMBU, KOTTAYAM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY P.J.JUBY. 2. LAL JOHN, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.M.P.JOHN, MOOLAYIL HOUSE, PERINGALA P.O., KUMARAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOCHI. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.GOPAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No. 26386/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17/3/2011 IN WPC.3930/2011 AND CONNECTED CASES. EXT.P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE SCHEME FORMULATED AND PLACED BEFORE THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC.3930/2011. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF FINAL JUDGEMENT DATED 31/3/2011 IN WPC.3930/11. EXT.P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE PROPOSAL APPROVED BY THE IST RESPONDENT VIDE ORDER DATED 7/9/2011. EXT.P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 7/9/2011. EXT.P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 7/9/2011 ADDRESSED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE PAPER REPORT AS APPEARED IN THE MATHRUBHUMI DAILY DATED 2/10/2011. EXT.P8 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 2/10/2011 ADDRESSED TO THE CHAIRMAN, RTA, ERNAKULAM. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL /True Copy/ vps PA to Judge P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 26386 OF 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted on instructions that Ext.P7 is only a temporary arrangement for a period of three days and that the traffic arrangement referred to therein is no longer in existence. Such being the situation, the petitioners cannot have any subsisting grievance in view of the fact that Ext.P5 continues to have efficacy. The writ petition is accordingly closed as infructuous. P.N.RAVINDRAN, (JUDGE) vps