IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY THE FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN : PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU CONTEMPT CASE NO : 872 of 2007 Between: Bondla Swaroopa Vani W/o.B.M.S.S. Kumar ..... Petitioner AND 1 Sri V.Sarath Babu, District Manager (Housing), A.P. State Housing Corporation, Opp: Lane to Collectorate, Guntur. 2 Sri J.V.S.R.K. Prasad, Deputy Executive Engineer, A.P. State Housing Corporation, Nellore. (now in Guntur) 3 Sri R. Subrahmanyam Managing Director, A.P. State Housing Corporation Ltd., 3-6-184, Urdu Galli, Himayath Nagar, Hyderabad. (formal party for the purpose of CA) .. Respondents/Respondents 3, 4 & 2 4 The A.P. State Housing Corporation Ltd., rep. by its Managing Director, 3-6-184, Urdu Galli, Himayath Nagar, Hyderabad. 5 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Housing (Rural Housing), rep. by its Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. (RR 4 & 5 herein are not necessary parties) .....Respondents The Contempt Case Under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to take into cognizance of the contempt committed by the Respondents 1 to 3 herein in not implementing the orders dated: 03-09-2007 passed in WPMP No. 23985 of 2007 in WP. No. 18688 of 2007 by this Hon`ble Court; The Contempt case coming on for hearing upon perusing the case and the affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Posani Venkateswarlu, Advocate for the petitioners and of Sri K. Mohan Ram Reddy, Advocate for the Respondents 1 to 3, the Court made the following ORDER: “In spite of granting several adjournments interim order passed by this Court on 03-09-2007, suspending the proceedings under which the petitioner was transferred, is not implemented and the learned counsel for the respondents states that the respondents have filed a vacate stay petition seeking vacation of the interim suspension and, therefore, there is no necessity of implementing the interim order. It is also stated that no vacancies are available. The respondents should understand what exactly the implication of a suspension order. Suspension order is not equivalent to a stay order. Prima facie, I am of the opinion that the respondents have committed contempt of the Court orders. However, they are granted ten more days for implementing the orders of this Court. If the interim order, dated: 03-09-2007, passed by this Court is not implemented by 12-11-2007, the respondents 1 and 2 shall be present before this Court on 12-11-2007 at 1030.a.m. Post on 12-11-2007”. SD/-G. RAMAKRISHNAIAH DEPUTY REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. Sri V.Sarath Babu, District Manager (Housing), A.P. State Housing Corporation, Opp: Lane to Collectorate, Guntur. 2. Sri J.V.S.R.K. Prasad, Deputy Executive Engineer, A.P. State Housing Corporation, Nellore. (now in Guntur) 3. Sri R. Subrahmanyam Managing Director, A.P. State Housing Corporation Ltd., 3-6-184, Urdu Galli, Himayath Nagar, Hyderabad. (ADDRESSEES 1 TO 3 BY RPAD) 4. One CC to Sri Posani Venkateswarlu, Advocate (OPUC) 5. One C C to Sri K. Mohan Ram Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 6. One spare copy Ksv HIGH COURT CVRJ DATE: 01-11-2007 NOTE: POST ON 12-11-2007 ORDER C.C. NO. 872 OF 2007 DIRECTION