IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37876 of 2009 SATRUGHAN SINGH S/O SRI PATHALU SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 9.12.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 386/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is named in the first information report on the basis of the disclosure made by the accused persons arrested at the spot, but there is no delivery of any property and the petitioner has remained in custody since 5.2.2009 and there is no other criminal case of similar nature pending against him, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A.K. Singh, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur in Sahebganj P.S.case No.143 of 2007 (G.R.No.1522 of 2007 Trial No.3124 of 2009), subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date - 2 - and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )