1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eleventh day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14649 of 2011 1.MULLAN SYED ALI 2.ABUTHAHIR ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MELAPALAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.727 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.M.A.JINNAH Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.727 of 2011, for offences under Sections 448, 294(b), 352, 506(i) IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Harassment of Women Act, 2002, the petitioners are before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail. 2. It is stated that the de facto complainant had borrowed a sum of Rs.60/- from the accused. But, she did not repay the same. The accused demanded the said amount, which resulted in a quarrel between them. In the said occurrence, it is stated that the other accused slapped the de facto complainant, who is a woman. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have got nothing to do with the alleged offence and they have been falsely implicated in this case. 4. Having regard to the nature of crimes said to have been committed by the petitioners, having regard to the fact that there was a money transaction between the parties and all other attendant circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.V, Tirunelveli, executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police for a period of four weeks every day at 10.30 a.m., without fail. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 11/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, TIRUNELVELI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MELAPALAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. S.M.A.JINNAH Advocate SR.No.39156 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14649 of 2011 Date :11/11/2011 TR :12.11.2011: 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/