1N THE HIGH COURT OF ()HHA’IVI‘lSGAKl-i : BILASPUR Wnt Petition No. 1881 of2005 (Writ Petition under Arucle 226 of the (,onsntunon of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shn‘ Satish K. Agnihoui J.) Shri Vivek Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashan'k ’l‘hakur, Panel Lawyer for the respondent No. 1 / State. U R I) h R ( Passed on thi 28th Day t anuary, 2009 ) l. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that this peu‘tion has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent] State has no objection. 3. In View of the foregoing, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, M(W)P No. 1456/2005 is also dismissed. Sdi’~ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge y Thakur x Petitioner M/s Payal ’l‘xavels, through partner Swaroop Chanel Jain, S/c Ghisulal Jain, aged about 4-5 years Rio Sadar Bazar, Burg, Digtt. ourgfcof) velsus Respondents l. Secmtaly. Regional Transport Authority, JO1gdalpur (C.G.) 2. Smt Yazmd Khatoon, "W70 Ahldx Ahmed aged about 36 yew R/o Subhae Nagar, Nohaapwa, Ralpur (C G )