IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35783 of 2008 1.HARIDWAR SINGH, 2.DIN DAYAL SINGH Both sons of Bikram Singh resident of Village Sanora, P.S. Tilacethu, District Rohtas -------Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 25.11.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.89/2008 for the offences under sections 364, 120B, 368, 370 and 371 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other co- accused persons took the brother of the complainant to Mumbai on the pretext that he will get job. However, the brother of the complainant got traceless and the complainant even after making inquiry from the petitioners and in Mumbai, he could not trace out his brother and he is still traceless. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the complainant has filed the present false case since the complainant was doing cultivation work of the 2 petitioners who had received an advance of Rs.10,000/- and the same on being demanded by the petitioners, the present false case has been filed. It is also submitted that the witnesses are the own relations of the complainant, who had deposed in support of the complainant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegations, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)