1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2655/2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.915 OF 2002 (Smt. Jamunabai Nandkishor Bartere and others vs. The Resident Deputy Collector, Yeotmal and another) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Smt. K.S. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri D. Pathak, Advocate for the respondent no.2. -------- CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J. DATED : JUNE 21, 2011 By the above civil application, the petitioners seek to amend the petition in terms of the proposed amendments mentioned in paragraph (3) of the same. It is the case of the petitioners that the said amendments are necessitated in view of the events, which have occurred subsequent to filing of the above petition. In my view, it would be just and proper to allow the above civil application so that the 2 subsequent events are brought on record. The respondent no.2 has opposed the civil application by dealing with merits of the proposed amendments. In my view, it would be for the respondent no.2 to file an affidavit- in-reply to the amended petition and it is not necessary to consider the merits of the amendments at this stage. In that view of the matter, the civil application is allowed. The amendments to be carried out within two weeks from date. The respondent no.2 would be entitled to file its affidavit to the amended pleadings within six weeks of receipt of the amended petition. JUDGE khj