IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7580 OF 2007 Husein S. Vohra ..... ...... ......Petitioner V/s G.M.Irani ..... ...... ......Respondent. Mr.Y.J.Master, Adv. For the petitioner. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 11/10/07 PC: The plaintiff is a tenant in house property. Apprehending forcible dispossession the petitioner-plaintiff filed a suit claiming permanent injunction restraining the respondent not to dispossess the plaintiff except by following due process of law. The evidence of the plaintiff is over and the defendant is under cross examination. At that stage the petitioner-plaintiff moved an application. Under that application prayer was made for issuance of direction to the defendant to produce notice dated 31.7.86 and two other notices issued in the year 1997 and 2007. A further direction was also sought against the defendant to produce the architect certificate of 2003 so also prayer was made for recasting the issues. The trial Court noticing the fact that the evidence of the plaintiff is over and at no point of time notice to produce was served on the defendant has found no justification for issuing direction to the defendant for production of documents. Perusal of the impugned order reveals that the trial Court has concluded that the application for production of documents was filed solely with a view to protract the proceedings of the suit. The order further reveals that the petitioner has been seeking repeated adjournments and was also proceeded against by 1 passing of an order of no cross which ultimately has been set aside. As the suit is of the year 1997 I do not propose to interfere with the interlocutory order at this stage. Leaving all questions raised in the present petition open to be agitated by the petitioner in an appeal in case suit is dismissed, writ petition is disposed of. 11.10.07 2