IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** RFA No.1732 of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 28.09.2010 **** Dharam Singh and others . . . . Appellants Vs. The State of Haryana . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: - Mr.Rahul Vats, Advocate for the appellants. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J. (ORAL) CM No.4641-CI-2010 and RFA No.1732 of 2010 This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 3791 days in filing of the appeal. On the last date of hearing, case was adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the appellants as he wanted to file affidavit of the learned counsel whose name is mentioned in para No.4 of the application that documents were delivered to him but he did not file the appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that he is not in a position to file affidavit of the said counsel. Therefore, I am convinced that the story put forward in the application is concocted and as such there is no ground much less sufficient for the purpose of condonation of delay. Hence, the application is dismissed. Consequently, the appeal is also dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) SEPTEMBER 28, 2010 JUDGE Vivek