IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2007 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 9119 of 2007(I) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- SANTHAMMA, W/O. RAJENDRAN, CHIRATTOLIL VEETTIL, ANGAMUZHI, KUMARAMPEROOR, CHITTAR, SEETHATHOD VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP M.VARUGHESE SRI.V.SETHUNATH RESPONDENTS: ---------------- 1. CHITTAR-SEETHATHOD GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, CHITTAR, SEETHATHOD. 2. SECRETARY, CHITTAR-SEETHATHOD GRAMA PANCHAYAT. 3. T.V. VARGHESE, THYIL VEETTIL, ANGMUZHI, CHITTAR, SEETHATHOD VILLAGE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 9119 OF 2007 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of March, 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner who is a resident of the 1st respondent-Panchayat is aggrieved by Ext.P1 order which was issued by the Panchayat in favour of the 3rd respondent on the basis of his application. I do not propose to go into the merits of the matter. Against Ext.P1, petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 application describing the same as an appeal. Since Ext.P2 is seen pending before the Panchayat, the Panchayat will take up the same, hear the petitioner and the 3rd respondent and take an early decision. Decision as directed above will be taken by the Panchayat within one month of receiving a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that Ext.P1 will be subject to the outcome of Ext.P2. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE btt WPC 2