1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Pursis (St) No. 3234 of 2008 In WP No. 4734 of 2004 Shri Telsingh v. State of Maharashtra and ors ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr A.K. Rudra, Adv for petitioner. Mr Girish Choube, Adv for respondent no.4 Mrs Meghna Munshi, Adv for respdt no.9 Coram : A.M. Khanwilkar and R.C. Chavan, JJ Dated : 24th April 2008 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments, the petitioner will be required to carry out extensive amendment to this petition. He submits that instead the petitioner would withdraw the writ petition and be granted liberty to file fresh petition in respect of the grievance which need to be redressed. In the circumstances, although this prayer is opposed by the learned counsel for respondent no. 4, in the interest of justice, we accede to the request of the petitioner. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. It is made clear that the questions raised in this petition or likely to be agitated in the prospective petition will be considered on their 2 own merit in accordance with law. Judge. Judge. joshi