1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO.747 OF 2006 WITH CA NO.1344/2006. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Bombay Central, Bombay-4000 008. - APPELLANT VERSUS Shri Dilip Jamanadas Thakkar (Since deceased by his heirs and legal representatives) 1) Smt. Shoba Dilip Thakkar and others. - RESPONDENTS ***** Mr.Manoj Shinde,Adv. h/for Mr. MK Goyanka, Adv. for Appellant; Mr.Parikshit Dawalkar, Adv.h/for Mrs.C.S.Deshmukh Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. ----- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 23rd April, 2010. PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The concurrent finding recorded against the appellant – MSRTC by way of damages granted 2 by the Court of first instance and confirmed by the Appellate Court, is questioned in the Second Appeal. 3) Learned Counsel holding seeks time. 4) I have gone through the Judgment in Special Civil Suit No.56/1983 and also the Judgment of the Court of 4th Ad hoc Additional District Judge, Dhule in Regular Civil Appeal No. 32/2001. The interpretation of contract by both the Courts is in tune with the document. The plaintiff’s entitlement to the damages, being spelt out, proved by the witnesses, need not be questioned. The high-handed action of MSRTC was indicated in the evidence. Consequently, I do not find any merit in the Second Appeal as it does not project any substantial question of law. Second Appeal with CA dismissed. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/sa747.06