IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.39827-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION:31.8.2006 Gurdial Singh ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & Ors. ..........Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present:- Shri R.S. Sihota, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.S. Gill, AAG, Punjab. **** Petitioner Gurdial Singh apprehending his arrest in a complaint dated 25.5.2006 submitted to the DIG, Jalandhar has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the petition. Counsel for the respondent-State stages that till date no FIR has been registered against the petitioner though a complaint against him is pending for consideration. Counsel for the respondent-State states that in case the police registered a case against the petitioner on the complaint made by Santokh Singh and going to arrest him, three days' prior notice will be given to him. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction that in case the police registered a criminal case against the petitioner on the complaint made by Santokh Singh and wants to arrest the petitioner, three days' prior notice be given to him. Disposed of accordingly. August 31, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) pooja JUDGE