IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2009 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 11073 of 2009(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. KUDUKKIL CHEMBAT KOMU MOIDEEN, S/O.MOHAMAD, P.O.PULICKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. KUDUKKIL CHEMBAT KADIYUMMA, W/O.KALLARAKALUTHUMMAL MOIDEENKUTY, P.O.VAZHAYUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. KUDUKKIL CHEMBAT BEEPATHUMMA, W/O.MANGATTU CHOLA MOOSAKUTY, P.O.VALIYAPARAMBA, PULICKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.POULOSE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE TALUK LAND BOARD, ERNAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, MALAPPURAM. 3. THE THAHSILDAR, ERNAD TALUK, MANJERI P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PULICKAL VILLAGE, PULICKAL P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. MR.P.N.SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.11073 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 3rd day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T In this writ petition all that the petitioner seeks is a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P3, where he claims that he is entitled to the benefit of Section 84(1A) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act. 2. Although the learned Government Pleader points out that the application is highly belated, and objects to the maintainability of Ext.P3, still having regard to the fact that all that the petitioner seeks is a direction for its consideration, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition with the following manner:- That the 1st respondent shall consider Ext.P3, with notice to the parties and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months of production of a copy of this judgment. The issue as to whether this application is maintainable or not will also be duly adverted to the 1st respondent. 3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg