bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1115 OF 1992 M/s.Mahalaxmi Tiles and Marbles Co.Pvt.Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.H.R.Shetty for petitioner. Mr.P.S.Jately for respondents. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & K.K.TATED,JJ. DATE : 24TH FEBRUARY,2010 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents. Perused petition. 2. Both the Counsel categorically state that the facts and circumstances involved in the present writ petition are also identical with the facts and circumstances which were involved in the case of Ramesh Occhavlal Shah V/s. Union of reported in 1992(62) E.L.T. 280 (Bom.), excepting that the policy which was involved in the said reported judgment was of the year 1980-81, 1981-82 and 1982-83; whereas in the present case, the policy involved is of the year 1983-84. 3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the above Judgment of our High Court, we direct the petitioner to apply to the concerned authorities with the requisite information and details for necessary endorsement/clearance or permission. This should be done within a period of one month from today. 4. In the event of approach by the petitioner, the authorities concerned shall scrutinize the claim of the petitioner carefully in the light of the Judgment in the case of Ramesh Occhavlal Shah (supra) and the relevant provisions of the concerned Import Policy give its decision thereon by passing a reasoned order following principles of natural justice within a period of 3 months from the date of application made by the petitioner. 2. Accordingly, rule is made absolute in terms of above order. However, there will be no order as to costs. (K.K.TATED,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)