IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT .TUDQF RAIPUR REVIEW PETITION NO. OF 2010 31 The maHer‘ of: ELF. (C) No.455/2010 decided on 03.08.2010 be‘rween: M5Ed£§§@ %”% g’twmq‘ w: PeTiTioner: Aiv‘ez Kumar' Dewa‘ngan Versus Sfafe of 6.6. & oTher's Respondem‘s: APPLICANT PaTir‘am Sahu, son of Shris‘o. (Respondenf No.5) BmvggLaJLSGhu, aged abou1' 59 years, Nomina’red Presidem‘ of Nominaf‘ed CommiHee, Birgaon Municipal Cou'ncil, Distric‘r Raipur (CG) Vs 1. Ai‘vez Kumar' Dewangan, Shri Ful Singh Dewangan, aged abou’r 36 year's, r'esidenf of Ward No.51 Tr-imur‘ri Nugar, Nagar Palika Beergaon, Disfric‘r Raipur (CG) 2. Sfo‘re of Chha’r’risgar‘h, through The Secretary, Urban Deveiopmen’r Ministry, D,K.S. Bhawan, Manfralaya NON-APPLICANTs Pe‘fifioner son of La’re Responden? No; Parisar, Raipur (CG) espondenf No. Chha’rfisgarh SToTe Elecfion Commission, o R 2 @ Cofee, Bgaon Municipal Council Disfric’r Raipur (C 10. Raghu Chandrakar, +Ha+1iia+ p mmif ir , G) Through The Secrefary, Mahanad‘i Khand, Manfralaya Pari-sar, Raipur (CG) Respondent No;3 Collecfor/DisTr'icT Elec’rion Officer, D‘isfr‘ic’r Raipur (CG) Respondenf No.4 . Municipal Council Beer'gaon, Through ‘The Chief Municipal Officer, Beer‘gaon, DisTricT Raipur' (CG) Respondent No.6 f0 12 6. P.S. Roo, Vice President of Nominafed CommiT’ree, Birgaon Municipal Council, Dislric’r Raipur (CG) .Hor-ilal Dewangan, Member Nominaled Commi’rTee, ' Birgaon Municipal Council, Dis’rricf Ruipur'(CG) Jabbar Dagli, Member NominaTed Commi‘r’ree, Birgaon Municipal Council, Disiricf Raipur (CG) Pardeshi Ram Sahu, Member Nominafed Member Nomina’red Commi’r’ree, Birgaon Municipal Council, District Raipur (CG) . SmT. Ambika Vadu,44er—H&l~ i“ W Member Nomina’red Commif’ree, Birgaon Municipal Council, Dis’rr'ic’r Raipur (CG) 12. Sm’r. SanToSh Varma', JdgHJra-l— WQ Member Nominafed Commi’r’ree, Birgaon Municipal Council DisTr'ic’r Ruipur‘ (CG) W, REV'IEW PETITION ON THE ANALOGY OF ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 READ WITH RELEVANT RULES OF THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH RULES! 200i @ , REWEW PETiTiGN N0. 93 of ZMD A§9iicant ‘ Patiram Sahu Versus Resaondents Aivez Kumar Dewangan & Others REVIEW PETIT30N ON THE ANALOGY OF ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIV1L PROCEDURE, 1908 READ WITH RELEVANT RULES OF THE H!GH COURT OF CHHATTTSGARH RULES, 2007 QSB : Eon’bm Mr. Satish K. Agnihctari, J.) Pa‘asent :- Shri B.P‘~.$harma, Advc’cate forthe appiican‘t. Shri MP‘SBha’tiai Dy. Govt Advocate forthe State. GRDER {ORAL} (Passed 0n 1&3“ a’a‘y' of Octeber, 2G1 0) Learned counse! appearing for the appiicant, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdmw this petition wiih Siberty to fiie an application for modification, to which learned counsel appearing for other side has no objection. ‘4‘; A 2. ii is ordered, as prayed for. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed as Withdrawn, with the afore-stated iiberty, if so advised. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge Ashok