IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2011 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 30548 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- S.JAYASREE, W/O. SIVANANDAN, SREE NILAYAM, CHITTILAZHIUKAM, CHARUPARA P.O., KILIMANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTING HER SON SHRI. S.JAYAN, AGED 35, S/O. SIVANANDAN, PASSPORT NO.H.4222869, NOW EMPLOYED AT QATAR, U.A.E., AS HIS P/A HOLDER. BY ADV. SRI.J.JAYAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE TALUK LAND BOARD, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 304. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 304. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PULIMATH VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-695 612. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.H.HANIL KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 30548 of 2010 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT DATED 12.7.10 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PULIMATH EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION NO.707/10 DATED 3.7.10 SENT BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PULIMATH TO THE PETITIONER EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 19.8.10 SENT BY THE TAHSILDAR, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TO THE PETITIONER (TRUE COPY) P.A TO JUDGE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).30548/2010 .............................................. Dated this the 17th day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court seeking for a direction to be given to the concerned respondents for effecting mutation in respect of the property owned, possessed and enjoyed by the petitioner in R.S.35/8 of Pulimath Village in Chirayinkeezhu Taluk. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only direction now pressed before this Court is to have the disposal of the representation preferred by the petitioner before the third respondent. Ext.P1 receipt dated 12.7.2010 in respect of the satisfaction of the fees, has been produced before this Court, to substantiate the filing of the representaion. 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 4. In view of th limited nature of the relief sought for, this court does not find it necessary to adjudicate the issue on W.P.(C).30548/10 2 merits. The third respondent is directed to consider the application stated as preferred by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 5. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with th copy of a writ petition before the third respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, Judge mrcs