1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.178 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO.4913 OF 2010 Majid Ahmed Oomerbhoy .. Plaintiff. Vs. Rashid Sattar Oomerbhoy & Ors. .. Defendants. And Nargis Majid Oomerbhoy .. Applicant. Mr.U.J.Makhija i/b Thakore Jariwala & Associate for the plaintiff. Mr.Rahul Narichania i/b Desai, Desai & Carimjee for defendant no.1. Mr.Shailesh Thakkar for defendant no.6/applicant in support. Mr.N.A.Bandodkar, 2nd Asst. to Court Receiver is present. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : APRIL 5, 2011. PC: 1. By the above chamber summons the applicant prays that above suit be heard and disposed of as expeditiously as possible and for the said purpose all necessary orders, directions be issued including the hearing of the chamber summons no.1218 of 2009, filing of Affidavit of Evidence and documents, appointment of commissioner for taking evidence and directing the said commissioner to record the evidence as expeditiously as possible. It is required to be noted that the apex court has by its order dated 7th January, 2008 expedited the above suit. The S 2 Division Bench of this court vide order dated 26th October, 2010 read with order dated 13th December, 2010 has also issued various directions in respect of the hearing of the suit so as to facilitate expeditious disposal. 2. Insofar as the chamber summons no.1218 of 2009 is concerned, by the said chamber summons the plaintiffs have filed interrogatories to be answered by the concerned defendants. The said chamber summons was heard today for sometime and was adjourned so as to enable defendant no.1 to file an additional affidavit in reply. Learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff - Shri U.J.Makhija states that list of the documents, alongwith the documents on which reliance is placed on behalf of the plaintiff have been furnished to the defendants and the matter is at the stage of admission and denial of documents. 3. Upon this Shri Narichania, learned counsel appearing for defendant no.1 states that since compilation consists of as many as 600 documents the said process of admission and denial though initiated by defendant no.1 would take sometime. Insofar as the affidavit of evidence is concerned, the same has been filed by the plaintiff and hence there is compliance of the order passed by the Division Bench dated 26th October, 2010. It is hoped that the parties would co-operate in the early disposal 3 of the above suit including the completion of admission and denial of the documents and the interrogatories which have been raised by the plaintiff. All the defendants are directed to complete admission and denial of the documents as expeditiously as possible and latest by 2nd May, 2011. (R M SAVANT, J.)