1 Mgn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2497 OF 2009 Sou.Chaya Suresh Jadhav & Ors. )..PETITIONERS Versus Deputy Collector & Competent Authority, Brihan Mumbai & Ors. )...RESPONDENTS Mr. Abhay Patki with Sagar R. Agarkar, for the Petitioners. Ms. Geeta Shastri, AGP for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.V.MORE, JJ. DATE : 21ST JUNE, 2010 P.C. Petitioners contend that considering the repeal their plots are not covered by the Urban Land Ceiling Act. Respondents have filed reply. In so far as Survey No. 264/4 is concerned, the respondents admit that possession has not been taken and in the light of that they do not propose to take any action in the matter. 2. In so far as Survey No.260/1, it is pointed out that possession was taken and for that purpose reliance is placed on the Panchanama which was signed by the petitioner No.5. The petitioner seeks to dispute this. In these circumstances this would not be a proper forum to consider that aspect. It will be open to the petitioner if they have got any grievance in respect of Survey No.260/1 to file independent proceedings by way of suit or other remedy which they may have. With the above observation petition disposed off. ( R.V.MORE, J.) (F. I. REBELLO, J.) 2