FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE REVIEW PETITION NO.149 OF 2005 REVIEW PETITION NO.149 OF 2005 REVIEW PETITION NO.149 OF 2005 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.6310 of 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.6310 of 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.6310 of 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. -------------------------------------------------------- Mr.R.K. Mendadkar for the Petitioner Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP for the State. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 29,2005 DATED : NOVEMBER 29,2005 DATED : NOVEMBER 29,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The Review by the petitioner is against the order dated 23rd September, 1995 whereby the order of the Caste Scrutiny Committee was upheld. 2. The case of the petitioner is that the order of the Caste Scrutiny Committee was exparte and in these circumstances the matter ought to have been remanded and the petitioner ought to have been given a fresh opportunity. While disposing of the Petition we have noted in the order that no additional document was produced which would have the effect of disputing the document already on record if we were to remand the matter back to the Committee. In fact there are two entries, one of the petitioner’s brother and the other of the petitioner’s sister which show their caste as Koli. 3. Considering the above we do not find there is any error apparent in the impugned order which would require exercise of review jurisdiction. Hence no interference called for. Review petition rejected. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) (DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J.) DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J.) DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J.)