IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.1765 of 2010 Date of Decision : 17.3.2010 Smt. Anita Devi and others ....Petitioners Versus Akhtar Ali and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr. R.K.Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the opinion that the instant revision petition can be disposed of at this stage without issuance of notice of motion to the respondents as resorting to this process is likely to delay the proceedings further. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order by which their evidence has been closed. The proceedings are before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. In the considered opinion of this Court, claimants' interest shall be defeated if the impugned order is permitted to stand. However, at the same time the petitioners cannot be granted any undue indulgence for delaying the proceedings. Therefore, considering the facts in their totality, it is desirable that the petitioners be granted only two more effective opportunities to conclude their evidence. C.R.No.1765 of 2010 -2- It has been stated before this Court that the eye witnesses to the accident belong to Uttrakhand and this has weighed with this Court to grant two more opportunities for adducing the evidence. Consequently, the petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside with the direction that only two more effective opportunities shall be granted to the petitioners to conclude their evidence subject to payment of Rs.500/- as costs. 17.3.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss