IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 132 of 2011. Date of decision: 16.5.2011. T.S. Kashyap … Petitioner. Versus Uco Bank through its Chairman & Anr. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1. No. _______________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent No.2.: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate. Deepak Gupta, J. (oral) 1. The petitioner by means of this petition had challenged his orders of transfer dated 3.8.2010 and 27.12.2010. 2. The respondents were directed to file supplementary affidavit, whether the petitioner can be accommodated in or around, Shimla. 3. Mr. Shrawan Dogra, learned counsel for respondent No.2-Uco Bank has placed on record two alternative proposals which read as follows:- “For the present we can accommodate Shri TK Kashyap at our Rajgarh branch. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. : 2 : Alternatively, Shri Kashyap should join at our Bhaba Katgaon branch to which place he has been transferred and care shall be taken to adjust him in our branches around Shimla in the current annual transfer exercise which would take place sometime in July/August, 2011.” 4. The second proposal is acceptable to the petitioner. I am sure that the bank shall take a sympathetic view in the matter keeping in view the illness of his daughter. The petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. “Dasti Copy” ( Deepak Gupta ) Judge. 16th May, 2011. (Krn Guleria)