1 jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. APPLICATION NO. 316 OF 2010 IN APPEAL NO. 1103 OF 2009 Jyoti Vijay Malusare ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent .... Mr. Rajendra Shirodkar and Archit Sakhalkar Adv. for Applicant Ms. P.H.Kantharia APP for State .... CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : JUNE 15, 2010 P.C.: 1 In this application the contention of the applicant is that she was a juvenile when the offence in question took place. We had directed the learned Principal Judge, Sessions Court, Mumbai to ensure that an inquiry is conducted to find out whether the applicant was juvenile within the meaning of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 when the offence in question took place. 2 2 We are informed that an inquiry was conducted and a report has been submitted as directed by us which states that the applicant was not a juvenile when the offence took place. In view of this, Mr. Shirodkar submits that this application does not survive. Hence, it is disposed of as such. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]