IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-12366 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 26.04.2011. Reena & another ..Petitioners Versus State of U.T., Chandigarh & others ..Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Suneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) Heard. Notice of motion. Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 – UT Chandigarh. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners, who are major, have married against the wishes of their parents on April 22nd, 2011 and now they apprehend danger to their life at the hands of respondents No. 4 & 5. It has been also contended that the petitioners have moved a representation (Annexure P-5) to the Station House Officer, Police Station Manimajra, Chandigarh in this regard. In this view of the matter, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh is hereby asked to direct Station House Officer, Police Station Manimajra, Chandigarh, to look into representation (Annexure P-5) and if there is any substance in it, may proceed further in accordance with law. Disposed of. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 26.04.2011. neetu