1 APPA-1274-11.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1274 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 1246 OF 2011 Prithviraj Jaychand Oswal ... Appellant vs. Kaynet Finance Ltd. & Anr. ... Respondent Mr. Mahendra Agavekar with Mandar Limaye, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr.Y.M.Nakhawa, APP for the respondent - State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 9th November, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant. 2. For the reasons given in the application, delay of 3 days in filing appeal is hereby condoned and the application stands disposed of. 3. Appeal be registered. 4. Perused the impugned order. It appears that the respondent No.2, who is a practising Advocate, while appearing for the accused persons before the 2 APPA-1274-11.odt trial Court, had made certain submissions on the basis of instructions given to him in respect of delivery of certain stocks and shares. The applicant/complainant contended that those submissions were false and therefore he should be prosecuted and punished under Section 340 of Cr.P.C. After hearing the parties, the learned District Judge rejected the application by the impugned order dated 18.6.2011. That order is sought to be challenged in the present appeal. In view of the facts and circumstances noted above, I find no substance in the appeal. The Appeal stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)