IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1702 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- BATI DEVIDAN BHIMBHAI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 1702 of 1999 MR KV SHELAT for Petitioner No. 1-3 MR SP HASURKAR for Respondent No. 1-2 M/S.VYAS ASSOCIATES for Respondent No. 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD Date of decision: 30/09/2003 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard learned advocate Mr. K.V.Shelat on behalf of petitioners, learned AGP Ms. Archana Raval appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and learned advocate Mr. D.D.Vyas appearing on behalf of respondent No.3. 2. Having considered the submissions made by all the learned advocates and considering the fact that by an interim order Civil Court has granted protection in favour of the petitioners, according to my opinion present petition has now become infructuous. Therefore, present petition is disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. Interim relief, if any, shall stand vacated. 3. However, it is made clear that in case of any difficulty, it is open for the petitioners to merely file a note in the registry of this Court for revival of the present petition. (H.K.Rathod,J) Jayanti*