HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33184 of 2010 Date : 18.01.2011 Between : Sri Mathrusree Co-operative House Building Society Ltd., Visakhapatnam, rep. by its Secretary. …..Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam & another. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33184 of 2010 ORDER : This writ petition is filed by the petitioner-House Building Society, seeking directions by way of Mandamus, directing the respondents to register the complaint, dated 14th January 2007, filed by one Sri K.Chittibabu Chowdary, the then President of the said Society. A copy of the complaint is placed on record. It was filed against one Sri T.Jagannadham, who was elected as Secretary of the petitioner-Society, alleging that he had transferred certain plots illegally with the connivance of other Directors. It was also stated that the money realized from such illegal transfer of plots was also not brought to the Society’s account till date. It was the grievance of the petitioner that inspite of such complaint filed by the then President of the Society, no action is taken by the Police. When the matter is taken up, based on the written instructions, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader for Home, that pursuant to lodging of complaint by the erstwhile President of the petitioner-Society, the same was inquired into and the petitioner was advised to settle the issue before a Civil Court, as much as the allegations made in the said complaint, are of civil nature. It is to be noted that this writ petition is filed in 2010, seeking to register the complaint, dated 14th January 2007. It is also to be noticed that Sri T.Jagannadham, against whom the petitioner is seeking relief, is not made party-respondent to this writ petition. In that view of the matter, no direction can be given as prayed for, but in view of the submission made by the learned Government Pleader for Home, that the allegation is of civil nature, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, permitting the petitioner to pursue the remedies available under the Co-operative Societies Act or under any other law. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 18th January 2011 ajr