IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.8164 OF 2006 PETITION NO.8164 OF 2006 PETITION NO.8164 OF 2006 Adarsha Industrial Premises Co-op. Society Ltd. ... Petitioner Versus Dy.Registrar, Co-operative Societies K/West Ward and Others ... Respondents Shri Girish Godbole for the Petitioner. Ms Vaidehi Mhaispurkar, A.G.P for the Respondent Nos.1,3 and 4. Shri Sachin Manale for the Respondent No.5. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : FEBRUARY 13, 2007. : FEBRUARY 13, 2007. : FEBRUARY 13, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Petitioner and Advocates appearing for the Respondents. A Revision Application preferred by the Petitioner for challenging the order passed by Divisional Registrar refusing to grant stay is pending before the State Government. This court has already granted ad-interim order in favour of the Petitioner. This Petition can be disposed of by directing the State Government to decide the Application expeditiously. 2. Hence, Petition is disposed of by passing following order: (i) The Revision Application preferred by the ... ... ... 2 ... 2 ... 2 ... Petitioner will be decided by the State Government within a period of six weeks from the date of production of an authenticated copy of this order. Ad-interim order passed by this court on 15th December, 2006 will continue to operate for a period of eight weeks from today. (ii) All contentions on merits are kept open. (iii) It is obvious that this order does not preclude the Divisional Registrar from hearing the Appeal which is pending before him. Judge. Judge. Judge.