1 Cr Apln 2697 & 2539/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Criminal Application No.2697 Of 2011 Ashok s/o Shamrao Dahiphale .. Appellant. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents. -------- Shri. R.S. Shinde, Advocate, holding for Shri. N.L. Chaudhari, Advocate, for applicant. Shri. B.J. Sonwane,Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. -------- With Criminal Application No.2539 Of 2011 1) Anil s/o Trimbak Sangle 2) Gorakh s/o Trimbak Sangle ... Applicants. Versus * The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent. -------- Shri. S.S. Jadhavar, Advocate, for applicants. Shri. B.J. Sonwane, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent. --------- CORAM: T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATE: 5th JULY 2011 2 Cr Apln 2697 & 2539/2011 PER COURT : 1) Both these applications are filed for grant of anticipatory bail in Crime No.I-203/2011 registered at Topkhana Police Station, Ahmednagar. The APP has made the papers of investigation available. Ad-interim protection was given to the applicants. 2) The crime is registered on the basis of a report given by a woman. The complainant has alleged that she was acquainted with Gorakh Sangle, one of the applicants, as he was visiting a mess situated in the vicinity of her house. He started sending SMSs to the complainant and after that he contacted her on phone and sent railway ticket for Manmad inviting her to celebrate his birthday. After receipt of the ticket the complainant went there. She was taken to a hotel and was kept there. It is further alleged that in December 2010 applicant - Gorakh committed sexual intercourse with her on many occasions by giving promise of marriage. The complainant has contended that Gorakh then left the place and he told that he was not ready to marry her. Therefore a crime was registered against Gorakh for an offence under section 376 of the IPC and he is granted bail in that case. 3 Cr Apln 2697 & 2539/2011 3) The complainant has made allegations that she went to the residential place of Gorakh but his relatives were not ready to perform her marriage. The complainant has contended that there was a talk of compromise and an amount of Rs. 22,000/- was offered to her. She has made allegations against remaining two applicants that they behaved in indecent manner with her on 31-1-2011 when there were talks of compromise. 4) The woman has given age as 29 years. Aforesaid circumstances show that there is no need of custodial interrogation. Whatever document was obtained was, according to her, a notorised document under which an amount of Rs. 22000/- was paid to her as there was a compromise. 5) In view of this, the interim relief already granted is confirmed. The applications are allowed. The conditions imposed on some applicants to apply against all applicants for a period of one month. Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) 4 Cr Apln 2697 & 2539/2011 rsl