IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28105 of 2008 1. SULOCHANA DEVI 2. SUNIL KUMAR MAHTO 3. RAMDEO MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 7/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a police case under Sections- 363, 366A, 376 and 120B/34 of I.P.C. The submission is of a love affair between the minor daughter of the informant and co-accused Anil Mahto when the two eloped together for marriage. The F.I.R. itself acknowledges that they were residing at Chandigarh when co-accused Anil Mahto also gave his mobile phone number to the informant mentioned in the F.I.R. itself. Learned counsel for the State from the case diary submits that up till now no material has come in the investigation with regard to the love affair between the daughter of the informant and Anil Mahto, neither has any investigation been done on the mobile phone number of co-accused Anil Mahto given by him, mentioned in the F.I.R. itself. Considering the facts and circumstances of 2 the case, let the petitioner above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail during the period of investigation, till submission of charge-sheet upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Kadwa P.S. Case No.49/08, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)