..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2483 OF 2008 Noble Resources & Trading India Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mr.B.B.Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP, for State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 3rd December, 2008. DATED : 3rd December, 2008. DATED : 3rd December, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is a company. On 10.11.2008 they were informed by their banker i.e. H.S.B.C. Bank Ltd., Fort, Mumbai about the notice being issued under Section 102 of Cr.P.C. regarding freezing of the account of the petitioner company to the extent of Rs.5,44,310/-. The said notice which was received by the Bank has been forwarded to the petitioner company. From the said document, it is seen that the notice is issued in respect of C.R. No.196 of 2008 of N.M.Joshi Marg police station, Mumbai in respect of offence mainly under Sections 420, 465 of Indian Penal Code. The learned Advocate for the petitioner states that from the said notice it is not possible ..(2).. to make out as to what documents are required by the investigating agency hence he seeks clarification regarding the documents which are to be produced by the petitioner company before the investigating agency. 3. The learned Advocate for the petitioner states that if the Officer of N.M.Joshi Marg police station informs them as to what documents are required from the petitioner company,the same shall be produced by the petitioner company before the investigating officer. 4. The learned APP states that by 6th December, 2008 the investigating officer will inform the petitioner company the details of the documents required to be produced before him. The learned Advocate for the petitioner states that the said documents will be produced before the Investigating Officer within a period of 15 days. Statements made by both sides are accepted. 5. In view of the above, no further orders are necessary at this stage, hence Writ Petition is disposed of. ..(3).. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)