^^1»^ <?-+s--= /<»/ ..2.. BEFOREJIQN'BLE^HIGH CQURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(C) No. _$l^u___2007 fCivil Matter S.B.) PETITIONER (Defendant) .vV^.^ ^y V RESPONDENTS .^< ^e9^> ^ ^^-°'" ^K Jmt. Renuka Gupta, aged about 40 years W/o Shri Vinay Gupta R/o Behind Shivani Medical House of Dr. S. K. Mishra Sahdeo Nagar, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS Shri Niraj Kumar Gupta Aged about 46 years, S/o Shri Ramavtar Gupta, R/o 54, Mahesh Nagar, Kourin Bhatha, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) - (Plaintiff) State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 QF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSG BILASPUR W.RfiNo. 3420/2007 Smt. Renuka Gupta Versus Niraj Kumar Gupta and another PETITIONER RESPONDENTS SB:- HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, J PRESENT:- Shri V.G. Tamaskar, Advocate, for petitioner. Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lawyer, for the respondent No. 2/ State. ORAL ORDER (7-1-2011) 1. Heard on admission. 2. The instant petition is directed against the order dated 19- 3-2007 rejecting petitioner's/defendant's application under Order 7 Rule 11 of Civil Procedure Code on the ground that admissibility of the document shall be ascertained based on issue framed in the case after recording evidence permitting the petitioner to raise such objections at the time of hearing. 5-. 3 . Ha-^ing heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the order impugned, I do not find any illegality in the order impugned. Challenge to the said document is still open to the petitioner at the appropriate time i.e. at the time of evidence. 4. Therefore, the petition being devoid of substance deseryes to be and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- I N.K. Agarawal Judge