^) j- c .& ^ W THE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MISC. APPEAL N0. /Of^ / 2004 DB / APPELLANTS Claimants 1) Dinesh Prasad Sahu / S/o- Jagamath Sahu Aged about 35 years 2)Jayanti Devi W/o Dinesh Prasad Sahu Aged about 31 years 3) Khusbu D/o- Dinesh Prasad Sahu Aged about 13 years 4) Akhay Ku. Sahu S/o- Dinesh Prasad Sahu Aged about 10 years All are resident ofvillage Kansabel, Tehsil- Bagicha, Dist- Jashpur (C.G) Versus RESPONDENTS ^ s-^. Shyamkesh Yadav (Driver) S/o Phoolchand Yadav Aged about 22 years, Caste- Yadav R/o- village Naeepura, P.S- Tahbatpur, Aajamgarh, (UP) At present- Rajendra Nagar, Ring Road, Raipur (C.G) < Ramshanker Sukla (Owner) S/o- Ayodha Prasad Sukla, Aged about 35 years, Caste- Brahmin R/o- Rajendra Nagar, Ring Road, Tehsil/Dist- Raipur (C.G) Divisional Manager, The New India Insurance Company Ltd. Kacahri Chowk, Raipur (C.G) 9- APPEAL U/S 173 GF THGE MOTOR VEmCLES ACT, 1988 ^ -__A, „— — 1—I.. -.^1- XI-HC-22 3Tf^T^iT f^iwsn^r stit< fff^(r *<l*1«TTSti'41ch 3ST '^WMil, WT^WM, [^viWy. .M:A;..t0..^/^^ ^KV^; •••••••••••••••••••'•/••^f—: fa^g; 3n^T?T(TTWfl1?(T 02/09/200S Appellant No. 1 with Advocate. None for respondents N Shri P.K. Singli, Dn Compaiiy Limited with Shri 3. and others by Shri H.S. Ahuluwalia, |o. 1 and 2, tisional Manager, New India Insurance ludhir Agrawal, C-ounsei tbr respondent No. Appeliant No. 1 filed permission to coinpromise th4 3 and 4. Not opposed. Consiit In terms ot' conipromis4 1) !n addition to compeij respondent No. 3 shall j to the appellants. 2) For disburseinent and adopted by the Tribun^ 3j The amount, if any, kj: under the orders of Trii 4'j Appellants shall be en| deposited. 5] In view 01 the above, stands dismissed. Sd/- ^rafefN-IITtRTf ff fW-tf^RTC ^STf^IT-W^T ,OK ADALAT an application aiong with affidayit for case on behalf of the minor appeliants No. lered, allowed. ;, award is passed as below:- isation already awarded by the Tribuna], pay Rs.70,000/- (Rupees seventy thousand deposit in FDR, the direction and ratio i, il any, shall follow. spt in deposit with Bank shall be payabie )unal in accordaiice vvith law. ;itled to receive interest on the amount so appeai against respondents No. 1 and 2 be given to the parties iree ot cost. (Justice Vijay Kumar Shri'j'astava) High Court of Chhattisgar^ Bilaspur ^••"o Sd(- Member - Lok Adalaf High Courfc of Chhattisgarh, ('ftiy^) i: 1