e; p y / IM THE HIGH GOORT OP JUDICATURS O? CHHATTISOARH AT ' *-l.E' <^ S^ * W.P.Ko.s J-6^7 /2 002 PET.XTIOK'ER ^!^?-^ S^9:^ ^y ^p\-&'<" ^-•"' ^•' -A®1- aSSPONBSNTS Balweer Singh s/o Bisanlal Dhurve, tSslonglng to Scheduled Tribe), Assi.stant Sngineer holding post o£ Suto..Divisional Officer tRucal and Sngineertog Services), a.E.S. Balode Bazar and residence at Baloda Bazar, District Sa.ipur (C.o. ) VERSUS '..\ •• .c'.y' i^" •caaft^u/'li'y-^flfmssftit 1. Tba State of Chhattisgarts throug'n Collecfcor aaipur • (Mstrlct Raipur) (C.G. ; 2. Tfae Secretary, Ministry of Panchsyat and RuralDevelopment Offics. at Oau Kolyan Sjji.gh Bha ir, District aaipur (C.G.) 3. The S-aperlntendent Engineer, Graroin Yantriki 3e'»a Mandal at Raipur, Oistrict Raipur. Executive Snaineer, Rural Enginesring Services Oivisiori. Saipur. District Raipur 5. The Bngineer-in-Chief, W'bter Resoarcss Departraent, Isip'.ir Oistrict Haiour (G.G. ) 6. Kainal Sharroe s/o A.R.Sharma, Sub-Sngineer, resident of and Post Office at Bila.i.garh Tehsil Bilaigarh District - aeipur (C.G. 5 .^'- \-.^^?" • CONSTITUTION OF Iiroi.?i ?CS ISSUS OF WSIT IH THE NATORE OF MANDAWS, EROHIBITICN, KRB CERCIORARY ETC. OR AKY APPROPTSIATS WRIT. BIRgCTION OR OROES, ^! ^ /u- XI-HC-78 3^' •*inwi{, w^wis, fSfdiyy . t^fP l<Si^ / ^Z^ Ni*iwi sn*iich "••••••"••••'••/•••• ^q- 2QQ 311^?T qgq? (^cli^cj^aT) W^TSRTR-li* (lp)T3II^Tsh*li<ti SRiranifersn^T ^rafei^-T wqrfr'fffecfr rfSfRR ^3ri^iT3n^T Dv. Govt. Advocate for the Shri Shri C.R. Sahu antl Shri Saiitosh Sahu. Coiuisel for the rietltioner. Shri Satish Guota.l State/resnondents No. 1 to 5. None for respondent Nd.6. Arguiaents heard. Order dictated as foUovts: 10 1 f» O.ftfK-i P«A^>«<W^/^^?J The Detitionerwho wa4 Rural Ensineerine Services (R the validitv' of the order dat4d P-1. bv which. his services denartiuent i.e. Water Resf efFect. Treatmg fhis order at filed this petition for quashuit A replv ui fonn of pr^l behalf of respondents No.l t4 reulv that as an effect of oetiUoner has ioiaed iath.ci Chief aud thereafter. on hisl State of Madhva Pradesh a4d the State of Madhva PradesU Kolar Pi-oiect. Sub Divisionl workiag as a Sub-Divisional Of&cer, '.E.S.I. Baloda - Bazar has challeneed 26/6/2002 contaiaed iu Aiinexure have been reuatriated to Ms parent 3urces Departnient with iinniediate a traasfer order. the roetitloner has e offhe saiae on various erounds. :Uiu.iaar\~ obiectiou has been filed on 5. It has been stated in para 2 ofthe the a&resaid repatriation order, fhe .office of the concenied Ensiaeer-iii- choice. he has been allocated to the he has been relieved for iou'iuig in ili fhe oftice of Sub Divisional Officer, No.15. Raliati. District - Sehore on K XI-HC-78 3TI^T^>Tf?-IR> (W 311^1 sbllh s^A^/ftA •f^ *imwi ShHT^ '<<lllcl<l, eiTflu'ls, fsldl'Hy s'c .(A/r-i S €.q-/^L. '•TR- 200 .'" s! I'r ^ 3TT^TiraW (lyi^'sl*:^') STttTmofN'sn^r 8/11/2002. A copy of fhe been fUed as Aiinexuic R-l. The subBiission of fhs fllial allocation. of the petiti^ and sUbsequentlv on reUevu'] of Madhva Pradesh. this Annexure P-1 has become in| TMs factual position oetitioner aad thev also aerd mfi-uctuous ,oa accoiint of ff State of Madhva Pradesh. In the rcsult. there is the oetition. The petition is finaUv tni<lFfl<fl.] WlRft' ff fgcQ (fSftZK ^arl^q'sT^r liaeino contaiiiina all fhese facts has State Couasel is that in view of fhe jiner to the State of Madhva Pi-adesh i|g fhe petitioner for ioiniilg ia the Stale luetition for quashias of fhe order uiltructuouis. is not disputed by leai-ned counsel'^r ^ that iii fact. fhe oetitiou has becoiae flnal allocation of fhe oetitioiier to the to necessiti- o- proceediiie furfher with isoosed of. being infructuous. r.- —- .*», Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge