1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2656/2010 Rakhee Parihar vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order: 12.4.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA,J. Mr. Ranjeet Joshi, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner obtained the appointment vide order Annex.3 dated 30th Nov., 1998 by showing her to be a divorced lady. When fact came to the notice of the respondents-employer from the notice sent by the advocate of petitioner's husband that petitioner is not a divorcee then the petitioner's service was terminated vide order dated 29.2.2000. The petitioner challenged the said order by preferring the writ petition no.679/2000, which was dismissed by this court vide order dated 21.8.2000 after holding that the petitioner could not have been given appointment as divorcee as at relevant time her divorce petition was pending. This court held that the appointment to the petitioner was de hors the rules. After the decision of this court dated 21.8.2000, the petitioner obtained the consent divorce on 16.9.2003 and now the petitioner has again approached this court on the strength of the divorce decree dated 16.9.2003 and is challenging the order dated 29.2000 in spite of the fact that 2 here earlier writ petition to challenge the order was dismissed by this court. The writ petition on the face of its frivolous and is abuse of process of the court. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-