IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 152 of 2009 Arvind Kumar Agarwal S/o Sri Atma Ram ...... Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ...... Respondents Mr. Arvind Vashisht, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H. C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for the State. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Arvind Vashisht, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H. C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for the State. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of finally today at the motion hearing stage without admitting it for hearing. Learned counsel for the respective parties agreed that in the interest of justice the following consent order may be passed:- After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; perusal of the record; the fact that the FIR discloses an offence punishable under section 304-A I.P.C., which is a bailable offence according to the provisions of Cr.P.C.; learned Addl. G.A. for the State has also stated that the offence is bailable and if the petitioner surrenders before the court he will be enlarged on bail as there is no hurdle in releasing the petitioner on bail; and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that if the petitioner surrenders before the court or he is arrested by the police and if he prefers a bail and furnishes the sureties as ordered, application, he shall be released on bail immediately without waste of time. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 19.03.2009 LSR