CWP No.7248 of 2010 --1-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.7248 of 2010 Date of decision : 23.04.2010 Suraj Bhan Sharma and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL **** Present: Mr. Hemen Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioners have approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to retire them compulsorily in view of the instructions issued by the State of Haryana and adopted by respondent Nos.3 to 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners have served separate legal notices (Annexures P-1 and P-2), upon the respondents ventilating the claim as set up in the writ petition on which, no action has been taken so far. Learned counsel further states that at this stage, the petitioners shall feel satisfied in case a time-bound direction is issued to the respondents to consider and decide the legal notices, Annexures P-1 and P-2. CWP No.7248 of 2010 --2-- After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners and perusing the file, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the legal notices, Annexures P-1 and P-2, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. April 23, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) atulsethi JUDGE