{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2488 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2571 OF 2010 XXX-XXX CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2488 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1051 OF 2010 Dr.Shaheen w/o Shaikh Imran & others APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Others RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2571 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2180 OF 2010 Shaikh Ramzan s/o Sbdul Aziz APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. G.R.Syed, Advocate for the applicants Mr. P.P.More, APP for respondent State MR.S.S.Mundhe, Advocate for respondent No.3 ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 29th July 2010 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. {2} 2. These applications are preferred by original accused No.1 to 4 in CR No.158/2009 registered with MIDC CIDCO Police Station, Aurangabad on the complaint of respondent No.3 for an offence punishable u/s 307 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequent to the filing of criminal application Nos.1051/2010 and 2180/2010, for quashing of the FIR in CR No.158/2009, it appears that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed before JMFC, Aurangabad on 29th May 2010 and case is numbered as RCC No.52/2010. 3. As charge sheet is filed during the pendency of the criminal applications, by the present criminal applications, the applicants seek leave to take the charge sheet on record and allow them to amend the criminal applications No.1051/2010 and 2180/2010. Learned counsel for respective respondents have no objection to carry out the said amendment in the said applications. In view of this, both the applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause “A” and “B” and stand disposed of. The respective applicants are permitted to carry out the amendment. The amendment be carried out forthwith. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/criapln2488-10