1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. NOTICE O MOTION NO.824 OF 2007 IN APPEAL (LODGING) NO.100 OF 2007 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.125 OF 2006 IN PETITION NO.835 OF 2005 Chandra alias Gullu Ramesh Manghnani. ...Appellant. Vs. Kishanchand Laxmidas Aidasani & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Shri P. D. Desai for the appellants in support of Notice of Motion. Mrs. J.M. Sidhwa for the respondents. ..... CORAM : R. M. S.KHANDEPARKAR & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. March 7, 2007. P.C. Taken on Board on the request. Heard Advocate for the parties. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. Considering the facts disclosed in affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, the same reveal sufficient cause for delay of seven days in filing the appeal. Therefore, delay condoned and the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Accordingly, the Notice of 2 Motion stands disposed of. The appeal on being registered to be listed for hearing on admission on 21st March 2007. ( R. M. S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.) ( DR.D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)