IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5213 of 2008 SAGUFTA NAZ, D/O SHABBIR AHMAD, R/O VILLAGE- MANDRAPALI, P.O.-MERAHI, P.S.-PACHRUKHI, DISTRICT-SIWAN. ………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SIWAN. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, SIWAN, DISTRICT-SIWAN. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SIWAN, DISTRICT-SIWAN. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BLOCK- PACHRUKHI, DISTRICT-SIWAN. 6. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, BLOCK-PACHRUKHI, DISTRICT-SIWAN. 7. MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, MANDRAPALI, DISTRICT-SIWAN. 8. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT MANDRAPALI, DISTRICT-SIWAN. 9. SHAMSHAD ALI, S/O MOHAMMAD ALI, HEAD MASTER-IN-CHARGE, RAJKIYA PRIMARY MAKHTAB, MANDRAPALI, P.O.-MERAHI, DISTRICT-SIWAN. …………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 19.07.2011 Petitioner claims to have appointed as Shiksha Mitra and, thereafter, claims to have continued as Panchayat Teacher till today. Her grievance is only for payment of her honorarium of the period May, 2005 to March, 2006. She claims that subsequent to 2006 she has been paid her honorarium and she has no grievance in that respect. The writ application was filed on 25.03.2008 with service of two copies of the same in the office of learned Advocate General. However, till today no counter 2 affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondents to examine from the records whether petitioner had actually worked as Shiksha Mitra between the period May, 2005 to March, 2006, or not. If it is found that she had worked, the respondents shall pay her due honorarium of the period positively within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Arvind/ ( J.N. Singh, J.)