..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2527 OF 2008 Shri Indraprakash Murarka and others. ..Petitioners. Versus Mr.Pavankumar Sanwarlal and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Subhash Jha, Sr.Counsel a/w. Mr.Bharat Vaishanawa i/b. Bharat Vaishanawa & Co. for the petitioners. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : 3rd December,2008 DATE : 3rd December,2008 DATE : 3rd December,2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners - orig. accused and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners are seeking quashing of process as well as case No.20/SW of 2007 pending before the Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 48th Court, Andheri, Bombay. In the said case process was issued under Section 420 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code. ..(2).. 3. It is seen that the stage of the case is that only process has been issued against the petitioners. It is clear that if the process is quashed, the entire proceeding in respect of the petitioners would come to an end. 4. For the reasons recorded in the order passed by this Court in the case of V.K.Jain Vs. V.K.Jain Vs. V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, P.V.Padode; 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, P.V.Padode; 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, which has been upheld by the Hon’ble Apex Court I am of the opinion that the applicant has an efficacious remedy of preferring revision against the order of Magistrate issuing process. Hence, in my view, it would be appropriate that the petitioners prefer a revision before the concerned Sessions Court against the order of the Magistrate issuing process. 5. Liberty is granted to the petitioners to prefer the necessary revision before the concerned Sessions Court. The learned Advocate for the applicant makes a statement that the necessary revision will be preferred within four weeks from today. Mr.Jha informed that the matter is kept before the trial Court on 5th January, 2008. To ..(3).. enable the petitioners to prefer necessary revision, the proceedings before the trial Court are stayed till 7th January, 2009. 6. Delay, if any, in preferring the revision be condoned. On the necessary revision being preferred by the petitioners before the concerned Sessions Court, the concerned Sessions Court shall dispose of the matter on merits after hearing the necessary parties. All contentions of the parties are kept open. 7. Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]