IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS FRIDAY, THE 20TH MAY 2011 / 30TH VAISAKHA 1933 WP(C).No. 13474 of 2011(H) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- SOSHAMMA, W/O. ANI DAS, AGED 35, A.S.BHAVAN, AYIRAM TENGUSERRY, KOTTIKADA MAYYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOLLAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691 001. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691 001. 3. BADRAN, THOTTATHIL VEEDU, AYIRAM TEHNGUSERRY, KOOTTIKADA MAYYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691 303. 4. MANIKUTTAN, THOTTATHIL VEEDU, AYIRAM THENGUSSERRY, KOOTTIKADA, MAYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691 303. 5. SUMESH, THAYIL VEEDU, AYIRAM THENGUSSERRY, KOOTTIKADA, MAYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691 303. 6. SANTHOSH, THAYIL VEEDU, AYIRAM THENGUSSERRY, KOOTTIKADA, MAYANAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691 303. R1 & R2 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR R3 TO R6 BY ADV. SRI. K.SIJU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 13474/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 05/05/2011 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs S. Siri Jagan & M.L. Joseph Francis, JJ. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 13474 of 2011 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 20th day of May, 2011. J U D G M E N T Siri Jagan, J. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to give adequate police protection for the life of the petitioner, her husband and her children as against respondents 3 to 6 and their supporters. 2. Respondents 3 to 6 have entered appearance through counsel and submit that they have absolutely no intention to harm the petitioner or her family members in any manner. On the other hand, the allegation of respondents 3 to 6 is that it is the husband of the petitioner who creates trouble for respondents 3 to 6. 3. We are not inclined to go into the dispute now insofar as respondents 3 to 6 undertake that they will not cause any harm to the petitioner and her family members. The undertaking of respondents 3 to 6 that they will not cause any harm to the person of the petitioner and her family members is recorded. The 2nd respondent shall see that respondents 3 to 6 honour their undertaking at all times. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Sd/- M.L. Joseph Francis, Judge. Tds/