1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1295 OF 2010 Ms Shila Mehta & Anr. ...Appellants. v. Prabha V. Yadav ...Respondent. Mr. Prakash Naik i/by M/s M.Dhruva & Partners ,adv. For the Appellant. Mr. Ashok M. Saraogi, adv. For the Respondent. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : JUNE 7, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Plaintiff/respondent had entered into the suit premises to run Yoga classes for a period from 1.4.2010 to 31st March, 2011. As the defendants/appellants had terminated the said agreement, plaintiff had filed suit no.1915/2010 for injunction. Therein she had taken out notice of motion no.2256 of 2010. By the impugned order dated 20th October, 2010, the learned Judge, City Civil Court had allowed the notice of motion and granted relief of injunction as prayed. That order is challenged in the present appeal. By the order dated 19th November, 2010, this Court had stayed the operation of the impugned order and admittedly, in view of that order, the plaintiff is not being allowed to run Yoga classes in the suit premises. Admittedly, period of contract came to 2 an end on 30th March, 2011 and, therefore, plaintiff could not have been granted any order of injunction for a period beyond 31st March, 2011.Therefore, the appeal stands disposed off with the following directions: i Order passed by the trial Court stands set aside as infructuous. 2 Plaintiff shall have liberty to take action as per law, as she may be advised, for compensation either by making amendment in the plaint or by filing separate suit. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)