XI-t--"—78 awStqn'R'iR; 'OTSSiR^T^TqW 3rcT ^|A||0<|, (STfl'H'lfi, isl^l'My ^-ft- ^o. %i^/ •5-c'06 ??gro! "ffltn siit?i ! <*i4f<'ttfl-( "MiS^ fe€r^fasar i '^•sfgBiffl^i HIOH COOKT OF'ICHHATTISG^AKH AT BILrASPUR Crlmi APPELLANTS 1. ItavisflanKar. ii/o. Bnaan'atlil Yaclav. agecl aDout Jt/-i ve-nrs, 1. Ipayamdtu Yadav, ti.'o. KavisiianKar Yacav, aaea ]S vears iotfi are resiaents ot villaae - Futut.acliliar. TUann — T^TiariirrtiiiiGrarl^ T~)ict^ Pa-ifrnrli ^Ct FT ^ RESPOnTJENT Sts: UUN 'BIJC, BUK1 UMlKEISlURAa.'USHRA.J. Sisn Awadh Inpathi, Advocatel S^ri Vinav Harit D\7- Arivocatel Dhlrendra Mishra. J ine appeUants ftave conviction and orcler of senteilce ssessions Judse. ^. l.C.. Kaieart Additional yessions .ludae aasl sentencecl eacli ot tliem to lUUU'- ancl m cietault otDavmeri unft Uunng penclency ot tliis 2J-2-2UU / wm.Ie undergoing tl wntten commumcation to Uu al Annenl Nn 21?/2nnfi versus State ot iJtUiattissarfi. mi'ougii Folise Station Raigarh (CG). tor the appellants. CTpne.r^l "for thf rp.snondent /State J UUGMEINT ('31-5-2007) preten'ed ttas appeal agamst tlie judfflnent ot dated 21-3-2006 oassed bv leamed 3'" Addl. m Kessions 1'nal .No. 1321'2UU.-i wlieTc&y leamsa convicted tftem under Section JU7 ot l.".C. arid Israo K..I. tor 1U vears and to pay a tme ol Ks. ilt ol tme. to tui-tlier undergo K.l. tor .1 months. appeal, appellant-No, 1 Ka\'istianKar lias ciiect on js sentenee aui'mg treatoent at L'iA'iy, Bilaspur. A ettect was siven on 1&-3-2UU/ bv Adclitiorial XI-I?C—78 3^T ^wivft^, ^wifa, fst^iyy (_,.A - ^a. ^-^00(J Snt^t^I^RT 'gq! SIR^ ai>i — ^" 'qOTfwft'itjWcif'? 'EiTsrRR ruUic Prosecutor. Smce legal to prosecute ttie appeal ot d^t tsy appellant KavislianKar starjcls r4al 3. Case ot tiie prosecutij ancl r.w. 5 venucihar are r4a neptiew ot F.VV. j Venuaiiiar. sons ot Venudhar. As psr catii a.m. venuaaai- went to the pl|a ancl BliolasbanKar ancl tounp plougtimg lus sliare ol tielct. Venutinar with an axe andl Bliolasftankar, Uangaram (F. f mjurecl venuaiiar and IJtioiaslianKar, wite yumautl.] .Nalistu ot Kx.F-12 was recoitl cliarge slieet was tiied m] UIiaramjaigarft tor ottence tum comnuttecl tne case to tn^ received on ti-anstei- bv Ieame<t 4. llie prosecution m accused'aiipeUants exammed persons were recoraeci under circuinstances appearmg asai tne date ot mciclent tbev tien's ot tne aeceased fiave not tilecl any appl'Lcation ;easetl Kavisfla&liar, tlieretore, tlie appeal preten'ed 1s abatsa. )IL m bnet, is tliat cleeeased appeUant .K.avisLianKar brottiers whereas appeUant No. i Uayami.tlu is [Kagtnimam(F.w. 6) anct yimlasftanKar fj-'. W. 7) are ^e ot Uie proseeution, on .iy.US.2UU^ at about X.li" lace ot mciclent alona wrtli ivs two sons Kasl-iuraam tliat KavisnanKar ana lus son UaymicUii wsre |lfte\' objected tlus; wiiereupon Uayamcltli assaultefl K.avisttankar assaultecl Kagtiumam with an axe. |\'.-!i) and yantosli tned to separate aem. lliereanei' Kagiiumam were tat.eil to Uvii. rlospital by son Vidlivaclhar ana IShagn'attii ot the villase. Uehat recoi'ped m tbe nospital. Atter completmg investigaiion, tlie L'ourt ot .iuaicial Maaistrate hu'st Class. untler Kection jU / read witli iieetion 34 ol IfL' wl'.c' u':. L'ourt ot Sessions Judse. Kaisarft and tlie same was Adclitionai Messions Juaae lor tnal. to establisn tae eliargc asamst t&e Inme witnesses. tliereatter tlie statement ot accuseci tiection Sl^ ot ttie Cr.P.C. m wiiicli tttey clemecl tfce (ist them m tfte pi'osecution case ana stated tliat on )fere sowmg paacty (sanna) m then' tield, i-i'uen I-HC—7S 3iR?I?5I1S;iW gsns^^tlN ~ys3! ^iiiw^, ®Tf1'y]i(o,tsi^iyy . ^^.Mo.^^P006 ^aTwgita si^i -'3,- venuclhar. uiiolasl'iaiUtar ancl Utfiy language anci also ttirea{ reooltecl mjui)ies yoKe ana Deat. lliey also reool itiev also exammetl U.W.-ll heai-me counsel fof the rj accusecl'appellants as mentioD]i S. Leamea counsel tor tt venudhar (F.vv.-.-f) rt is evicls) however all ttie tnree mjune^ lliouali tbe aoctor fias stated edsed weapon howevei' no venuclbar. llierelore tlie is aUegea that the accusea p] venuclbar liad statea m para] assaultea tiim wrtti backsiae ol para 10 ot tus deposition ttiat| were not assaulted by sliaip appellants tiaa no mtention to subnuts tftat tne complamant Delongmg to tfte accused pei possession and they hact stopp ana Deatmg them as a resuM pnvate detence ot property complamant party who were ^RferaN im?S ^" fe^l'iiSRcR ^^ftnamsi Kasliumam came tliere ancl abused tliein &y usma ened to Kiu tliem anct released Uis buUocKs trom tlis the matter ancl on tlieir report a case is pending. Ktiobba Kam. Uowever leamed trial Lourt atter sspective parties, eonvictecl ancl senteiiced the ;tl above. le appeUant su&mits tliat trom tne mjuiy reporf ot [it tftat he liad sustamed tlTl'ee uijunes over lus lisacl liave been ctescnbea as contusions by the clocior. |iiat tfte mjunes fiave been causecl by liai-tl and sKarp |ncised wouncl lias been tound on tlie person ot were m tact causea by tiarcl ancl blunt object, li srsons had usea axe m tfte ottence. livesi v.W.-S 16 ot iiis deposition that accusea Uayamclhi liaci tlie ase. P.VV.-6 Kagliumani wno nas aiso statea m |fte was assaultect t>y DacKside ot tlie axe and tnsy ticle ot the axe. llns clearly demonstrates tliat tiie ;ause cleath ot Venuclliar ana Uavamclhi. J-le tin'Q'.er }paity was assi-essor as they naci aone to me t'ic'ic'; jsons and iiacl tned to mterlere m tlieu' peaca'ul ;cl tliem trom plouahmg then' O'ATI tielc! by abusmg ot wtoch tlie appeuants exercisma thetr nglr; ol tiad usecl me mmimum torce to dissuacle tlie tnree m aumtier and m ttiese cu'cumstancss the XI-KC—78 Sn^qiIT^iRT •gql 311^1 WRR; 3^er ^)i<<i0A|, giTTiy'iis, (si0i<^y C^. A-Mc'-3)S-A^06 ^giwgftgan^i •1-t fh'WTCTf'SfS^"'^ •^r stigq 3!)^ appeUants were entltlea to be exf 1U3 Ot IfC. It 1S tui-mer sutmuttt ot IfC tlie prosecution tias to However, at me most tne prosecl wlule exercismg ot nallt ot pi'f covei'ed by exception 2 ot Kecticji by tiie appellants talls under se| tiomicicle and not uncler yection 6. Un tte otlier Iiand leamel tlie tnal Court ancl submined tliij usms axe ttince over tos vital p^ rsport ot Ux.F-2 ot skull ot venf liis neaa wtlicti was ai'ievous 11 opmed tliat m the absence ot trej evidence available on recora establisliecl. 1-le turtner sutnnits ngnt ot pnvate cietence, but the ttian it is necessan' to uitlict tor /. 1 ftave lieard tlie leamed the tnal Court as also tlie mipugn S. Dl-. B.S.Bhaaat (F.W.-l) was unconseious ancl was vomi1 wound m size ot 3 x 7em. on :e.n(led benetit uncler Section y'/ reacl wilfi s;ectioE !d tliat to establisb ttie ottence uncler yeetion SU! istablisli the mgretiients ot Section jUU ot ^L'. itson lias tieen able to establisn tfiat tfie aupellants 'ate cletence have exceeded that nglit wtuch is n ^UU ot U-'U, therelore ottence it anv. cotmmttefl ;tion SW ol IFC i.e. attempt to commrt ciUpanie 507 ofIPC. counsel tor tlie State supporteci tae juagir.ent .yi; appellant UayaD-lcllu aas assaulted Venucinar t'y |rt ot ttte bocly ancl as per tlie X-ray exammatioc [idftar. Venudtiar sustamecl bonv dislocation av-a' nature. ine doctor (P.W.-l) aas catesoncam pment Uie mjured coulcl ciie. llisreiore. trom me trttenee uncler yection JU7 ot IFC is clearn' pat even assumma that ttte accused pcfsons iiac; li-iglit aoes not extencl to intlictmg ot more far't^ |ie puipose ot cletence. |;ounsel tor tlie parties ancl pemsed me recorcl ot iaiudament. lias exammed Venudliar anct Iias tound ttiat (i) ne t|ng at the time ot exammation; (n) one mcisecs stt side ot postei'ior reaion . cloltea blood was (\ XI-HC—78 SiI^SI qil 1cili«>] 'TOI 3?I^?I ^i'qN? 3:5ET ^[PTRRT, ®Tfl'y'l(o,Rt(?iltiy ^^^lio.^^i^66 i^ y qiw!i'i41-< ii'itid)'^ felsk Tfera? 'S? atfgii s'i^T pi'esent and the bone beneatti tft^ cm. on upper portion ot riglil mjun' was also broKen and (iv)| aiicl Mooci around tlie mjury wa^ stiap eclsed weapon ancl aur^ arievous m nature. M.e reten-ed ot me mjuiy it is tound tliat exammed Kagliumam oa tfte sait i') mjm-y was DroKen; (m) eontusion m size ot 3 x 3 tronto-panetal resion, bone beneatli tlie sbovs ;ontusion over occiprtal region m size ot 2xica» clottecl. AI1 tlie miunes were caused b'v harcl aau tion ot mjunes was ttu'ee hours. Imia'ies lie patient tor X-ran'. M'om perosal ot X-ray pluts imere was Iracture ot head Done. Mc tias aiso le ctay ancl liad noticea toUowmg mjiines: conrusion|m upper portion ot len panetal region ot scalp m size ot 4|x4 cm.. Done was broken. Biooa was clotteu arouna tnt miun'. ii') contusionl scalp m si| around UK 111) y. lii Uie cross examinatioi pi'esent over tiie person ot Venu( Ms tias admittea Uiat lie lias no Ex.P-land P-3. In para 8 of hi police regardmg nature ot mjur mjurecl Venudhar was not giv< the evictence ot Ur. ii.s..Biiaaat m upper portion ot tronto panetat region on itze ot .ix2cm. &one was EiroKen. Dlood was elotteci mjuit'. one abrasipn over lett shouiaerjomt was tounct. (i tliis wrtness nas admitted that all tbe lirjunss tn.ar tiave tieen clescribed as contusions m ts.r-t. )|t mentionecl any mcised wouncl in tii3 repori ot ip deposition &e has statea that on sseTv tsy ae t of Venudhar he had ooined vide Ex.P-5 that if ,'ent>rompt treatment ne coulci clie. Itius, consiGer.'ag y.w.-i an(i A-ILC repon ot iryurea Veimclliai snd [-giC—7i SIRS; ?I Rl!'* w sns^ sh-ii* T 3^T ^Wv'i^, ^\W'W, Rtrtl'My (^..^ 8^0- .S-\^IS-00(, •renw "gfe? sn^? -Q Kasliumam it is establislied thal! as also Kaaliumani were sutticiej tlie mjunes present over tne person ot Venucir:; rt m tlie orciman' course to cause then' aeatb. 1U. f.W.-S Venuciliar lias st2|t alons wim tlis sons Kaalmmam (i tbat accused persons were ploujl trom plouglimg lus tieia. Uowel went near thsu' plouall and s| assaultecl trom belimcl wrttl an f teU clown ancl tie made tliircl aj oozmg however lie was conscK over tiis fteaa with axe Uu'ice. tt Mis son Bttolashanlcar raisecl an Bai and santosft reacliecl tliere Iftev were taken to the liospital. 12m tlie liosprtal itselt. i-le and wliere tliey were admitted and A'lA'U Uospital, Kaipur tor turtU cross exammation. tlus witness laM relatecl dispute as the accusf ttien' sKare. He iias admittefl 111 decunal. l-1e Iias tuiltier admitts tirottiers m the vear 2UU2 and tt stiares even pnor to ttie partrtion per the aocument ot lix.U/1, ;a tliat on ttie date ot mcicient m tfae momma 'ss nci iiliolasaanKar ha(i aone to h's tielc. lliey sa-n' lima their tlelcl. Me stojipea tne accusecl persocs »er accused persons a'al not asrse wliereupon i-is oppecl them. AE that tnne accusec! UayamGta Se on lus lieaci. Me mace seconfl assault att-sr rtS .sautt on lus toreneaa by an axe. Kloocl stariea >us. Accusecl KavisliarJiar assaultecl Kael'turaatu lis son also leli clown anci tsecame unconscioas. alarm, upon wnich 'janaaram, his wtte 'iurca'dii |ncl nie accused persons lett tbe place vvitfi a:\e. [folice was mtimatecl. Ue loagecl repoit ot Kx.t'- iis son wsi'e reten'etl to Uistnct tlospltai. K.aipur reatscl. .'Uter sometime tbey were asam sent to sr treatment waere tliey reinamed aciminea. In lias admittect tbat tlie auan'el staitecl 'aecause ot [d persons were plougtuns tne iana wnicA teil m |at ctisputed i!.Jiasra No. is W aclmeasurmg ll' p Uiat partition ftad talcen place between tlu-ee ^y were cultivatma tne tield ot tlien' respective ]m ttie year 2UU2. Ue has tuniier aclmiTted tliat as wl^icn is a memorandum ot partition, the disputed X[-1;IE—7S s^r -^ww^, 'a'^w'w, Rfi?si'y^< ^. ft^o.^^A&06 RI?iITX; 'aqr SIR^I giiiR; ••~7- qOTferiN fHv5 iffs^S'^vsp: wsifirasii^E lancl is recordecl m tlie name ot ftas also adBUttecl fliat tie ftas siart tliat lie complamecl about the s<| undei' Kection iu/ were mitiated] 'accuseapersons aaa also loased m UhaiTnjaisarii Court, wtlictt i^ tmlbei' aclmitted tliat at ttie tunel attei- tu-st assault lie tell down an< tsy Uavamcltll over ius neaa. Havislianliar. but ttiis was aone maavei'teatlv. Ue ;a tlie document ol tx.U'l taousEfi te lias statec. sifme m tlie ottice ot lalisildar ,md proceecliiigs 1 b:v tlie Folice. J-le lias tufttter admittecl mat ttic p complamt ease m relation to t!ie same mciaeffi penUmg. in para iy ot lus deposition Ue aas ot loclama tlie report. iie clicl not mention tl'ic: and ttiereatter seeond anct tftn'cl assaults wers aivai 11. fVv/f) K.aeliumam has Bholashankar and father had sonl plougluns meir nelcl. Wiien tfteyl tielcl, tfley questionea ttieu' aunio^ Ucn'amciru assaulteci tiis tatner V| ttie accusecl persons save tlu'ee ai'ound. At Uiat tuTie, lus t'rotll Sumauti Bai Gangaram and Saii ttiem. Hnolashankar (FW/7) tta^ aate ot mciaent m ttte mommg. Wften tliey stoppecl tliem trom pl( stated ttiat this is not your tield. not stop plouaiimg, lus taUier trom plouetung try releasms bui persons picKecl up the axe wflict tilso stated tliat lie alona wffii lus tn'otlie; towards tiis tielcl ancl saw tlie accuseci person'i |stoppea tne accusea persons trom pioug&me tiie tttv. Kaxislian&ar assaulted inm wffli ars ase ancl snudhar with an axe over his head timce. Both aslsaults. as a result ot wlucli thev Iel.1 down on Uie ler raisecl an alann. ttearmg wlucn his momer Kadtosli ot ttie Mllase reacliea tftere and seoarctect stated that ttiey lud aone to their lieicl on t&o Itrey saw Uie appellants plouatimg Wes tielc. liugtung, tlie accusecl persons starteci af'usmg ."inc; b(Jt it is tlieu- tieicl. Wften the accused persons aici ^ncl elcler Oi'other vvent to olivsicaUv stoo ttiein llocKs ti-om the voke. itiereatter. tne accuseci was Ivina nearbv ancl assaultea tiis latliei' aniS ..r\ XI-HC—7S STRgWl^N; •si<i!3n^?f'gi'qN; 3^1' -41-tilt?i^, ffiTfl'H'lto, RttfiWy Cc-^-^-^^l36^ -g. q?HRP!n 'IWvi! ^ ?? stim sfl^ brotlier tlii'ice. Botll ot tbem tej e\'ewitness tias not supportecl nostlle. However. m tfie eross et been anie to elicit anvtame. U aown. f.lV.K Uanearam wlio Iias bsea cited as tfie prosecution case ancl lie Iias been aeclareci tiammation ot tlus witness tlie prosecution fias not 12. r.vv.2 Utiamyeet timgii| prepared Uie spot map ot iix.f,] spot map ot fcs.F.'ll, the plac^ accusecl KavislianKar. rrom pi Venudhar and Kaahumam ancl appeUants m assauttmg Venuan^ FaiKra is UalKa Fatv/an ot tlie village wao ftscl 11. Iii cross exammation ae nas actmitt-:a mat 3 wliere tlie mciclent lias occun'eci is Uie tielu ot fasal ot tfte statement ot the mjurec! eyewitnessss; |also BIiolaram (F.'.V.'/), ttie mvolvement ot llie tr is establisliea. 13. Now comma to Uie ques| claimetl by Uie appeUant, trom ancl UalKa Fatwan uaaramjeel persons were cam'ma on plouglimg Kavishan&ar. lliis tact is also ej aamittecl tliat tfiey naa partrtione|cl vicle Ux.L)-! m ttie vear 2UU2. j-te ot Jlx.U-1, tnouatl lie Iias statec) oeen wrongly enterecl m tlie stia) nas been aclclucea by tlie proseci|tion nie possession ot tlie aceuse< complamant pai-ty was m tact li^ tlie basis ot oral ana clocument; mteiTecl tliat the accusecl persons fiov. ot nallt ol pnvate aetence ot me p'ropem' .'is ]tlie statemeirt ol Venuclftar as also BftcIasliaaKar Simsli Faila-a. the tieia m wilicli tllc accuseci |limg operatton was ot ttie ownersnip st accuscci Itablistiea by ctocument ot ii.x.U-1. Veniiclliar Kis tlieu' nolclmes ancl same was reducect to wntms te tias also actmitted ttiat tis Aas sianea cioc-ume-i't Uiat Kliasra No.sy actmeasunne 1U clesn'na) nas 1-e ot accused KavistiaaKar. Mowever no evKisnsi; to slmw mat tnei'e was any aisplite regarclmg persons over the disputea lanci or tliat tiie settled possession ot ttie clisputetl lanci. l&us on In' evidence available on recorfl it c.an sately 3e Aacl obtamecl the disputea land m tli'su' sfcare and XI-BC—78 S^ST ^ww^, vn!\v>\<c, wiftwy, :./ A- t^O S-^f-?GC. sn^i ^v vi.-vw Tisn'STI^T ^RT^ •^nwfflfisiTOi '^l^irai^ 7TR^f ^ '^ST t^RS?^ ~s^ -^Tici^ -_r j tliev were cultivatma ttie same tn'o sons went tttei'e ancl stoppe) mem trom plouahme their tielcl] statement ot yiiolashanKar it a m ttie basis ot same ana uuureci Veiruciaar and a:is 1 ttiem Ii'om piougtima and tnect to ptiysicaUy stop 1 and ttus was m tact Uie cause ot quarrel. from Uke |so appears t&at when Uie appellants dicl not iieeci the request ot tatfter Venu^] Kaaliumam went near ttaem &UIIOCKS trom tlie voke antl thd1 tlie axe Ivina neartiv anct assaull wlucfi tliey tell clown on ttie d) down on tbe ground onlv atld assaulted ttu-ice. is an imurove present over tlie pei'son ot ri Kaatiumam it has ali-eadv been two plaees over tfte head. it i: persons wlule esercisma tlie exceedeci tfie power siven to t nature wluca were sutticient ti persons, tiacl tttey not received leamecl counsel tor tlie auceUa eannot &e accqitecl. 14, it is now weu settled tft; action was m exercise ot tlie ciicumstance that wouia nave rets he woukl sutter deatli or ffl'ievoils liar and contmued ploualimg, \enuahar ..nct ncl tnea to pfaysicaUy stop tliem by releas;L&g mtunatecl tfie accusecl pei'sons. l&e;; pscKed up :ea Venudliar ancf K.aaimmam tl'ii'ice as a result ot round. Version ol r^V.-.-i vsniicinar TAat tis ^ell ttrst assault ancl tliereatter accusecl Uavamaiii nent trom tiis version m flK. M'om tt-ie mranes iiured witnesses F.W.-j Venuanar ana F.''.v.-6 Irecorcted that thev liact suttered bonv miui'ies a:t clearlv mdicative ot tlie tact tliat me accasecl |igtit ot prrvate cletence ot tiieii property hzve bem bv law and liave causecl miunes ol sueli a cause (teath m orcimai'v course ot tlie miurecl trompt treatment. llieretore tts argumsnts ot :r.e ht tliat tbe case taUs witbm Kection -lUb' ot 1:''J lt tlie onus i.s on 'aie accusect to estabiis!i that 1ns itiglit ot pnvate cletence. Me shouia make oul a re^sonabiy caused an appreliens'on m lus mmcl tiiat /Oils liurt it fte aoes not exercise fiis nglit ot pnva'te SIR^T ^; f?:iW 'gs?f3iT^IW:nq? 3^cT ^iiA|i<n<i, ®Tfl^i|s,{sicii'yy ^r.Fl^o.^)^/^'506 <A< '?(giw(rf?g siit^i 'hWiril'l-i 'V^I ^fs^t ^f^gK -10 Oetence. liie cletence has to bi court ttiat the nann caused t>y ttt attacK or tor torestaUins Uie tur) accused and Uie burcten ot ests In the mstant case, trom tfae establislied Uiat tlie mjursa per8( tfte appellants and caused mem| by Uie two mjui'ed persons, it| repeated btows over Uien' vrtal c| reasona&Ie ancl probable vei'sion satistyms tiie accusect was necessan' tor eitfter wardmg oa tlie pier reasonable appreiiension trom tlie sicle ot tlie al^lisiuns tlie plea ot-seU-ctetence is on tlis aecused. eviclenee availabie on recorct. rt Kas not been rspns were aimed witft weapon or tbat tftey aaacKed any mjui'y. ibrom tiie nature ot mjunes sustainea |is clear taat me appeUants mtentionally causea c|ai-ts wtuctl resultea m bony mjunes over sKull. perspns atores&id 1S. Un the basis ot unaer Kection 3U7 ot 1FC eannj cn'eumstances ot Uie case and were plouligmg tbeu' own Iielcl) tnecl to disturt) tlieir possession| any pi'emeaitation suddenly p( Kagliumam U'om DacKside. sentenced to uncler.ao Kl tor tiv^ bv tlie leamed trial Court. enc|s 16. in tns result, appeal is p tor ottence pumshatsle under K sentencecl to undergo Kl tor tivi ofpa\'ment offine to fuither analysis. eonviction ot appeUant Uayamctl'ii j)t be faulted. However. considering fiie facts and tiltfaer consiclenne tlie tact that Uie accusecl persons ancl tfte compiamant party were aesressor wlio |as a result ot wlucn tee accused persons wrtliout ]|ielcect up Uie axe anci assaultecl Veiiudnar & nqs ot justice woulcl 'oe sei'ved it the appellants are years msteacl ot 10 years as imposed upon tliem iprtiy aUowed. Com'ictton fft appellant Uayaniatii i^ction jU7 ot jrc is mamtamed. Aowevei'. he is years and to pay a tme ot Ks. 1UUU/-, m detault uncterao K.1 tor Uii'ee montlzs. _ ^ .,ren&a^toa Dbiie1 ]udge