28.4.2009 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate for the respondents CWP(T) No.4427/2008 (OA No.1221/97) The matter was heard for some time. It is the petitioners’ case, though seriously disputed by the respondents, that they were initially engaged as Helper in the year 1985-86 and continued to work as such till the issuance of the memorandum (Annexure A-1) issued in the year 1997, whereby they were offered the post of T-Mate regular, purely on temporary basis. . Mr. Ajay Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners has invited my attention to Annexure A-2, representation dated 19.7.1997 as also the letter dated 16.6.1997 (Annexure A-3), which prima facie evidences the said fact. Annexure A-2 is the representation which is pending consideration with the respondents. Since serious disputed questions of facts have been raised in the present petition, it would be only in the interest of justice that the respondents decide the petitioners’ representation first . In these circumstances, it is directed that the respondents decide the representation. The petitioners shall be at liberty to place additional material, if any, before the authorities within a period of four weeks from today. The respondents authorities shall take a decision by a speaking order, within three months from the date of receipt of suich material. Liberty granted to the petitioners to approach the Court if need so arises. With the aforesaid observations, the present petition is disposed of. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. April 28, 2009 (rana)