IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.12014 of 2008. Decided on: 29.12.2010. Sharmila Devi. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Surender Saklani,Advocate, Mr. T.S.Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vinod Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P.Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. Surender Saklani, learned vice counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 29, 2010. (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.