%1MA® @eép’éhdents Smt. Madhuri DeWangcn, Aged 31 years W/o Shri Navin Kurnar Dewangon Sikchha Karmi Vcrg — 1 (Chemistry) Govt. Higher Secondary School, Nagpura, District Durg C7G. Versus l. §tate of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Deptt. D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur 2. y‘Director of Public Instructions. State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Pension Bada, Bairon Bazar, Raipur (C.G.) 3‘. District Education Officer, Durg (C.G.) 4. The Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Nagpura, District Durg (C.G.) Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution 0f India for issuance of writ of Mandamus/dlrection or any other aggronriate writ.“ In the Hon’ble High Court 0f Chhattish/garh at Bilaspur (C.G.) W.P.(S) No. 3 5 DO / 2009§éng€£§ @gmh m,m WW, SB: HON’BLE JU$TICE MR. PRHQNKER EEiWAKEg 16-07-2$09: Mr. Somkant Verma, counsel for the peiitioner‘ Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Advoc for the State. Challenge in the instant Nrit petition is to the order dated by the respondent No. 3, by which the petitioner who is working on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade l (Chemistry) has been econdary Schooi, Litiya. School. Nagpura to Govt. Higher Counsel for thé where the petitioner is Chemistry subject and as against the same it is only the petitioner who is working but by the order imp gned, she has been transferred. He per ratio aiizatton policy of the Government: requtred o be shifted who are in surpius, but ‘l under no circumstances the petiti ner can be treated as surplus. Learned opunselqfor the make a representation ith law. would be decided in accordance . further submits that as only those persons are ate Generai with Ms‘ Sunita Jain! PL 06.07.2009 (Annexure P-1) passe petitioner submits that in the present school, there are two sanctioned posts of working, ate submits that let the petitioner before t e respondent No. 3 and the same v transferr d from Govt. Higher Secondary t 5 Wmuq..$.0./o.{ m 200 311w W (Wu) am anm am 311%?!m . ' mmm WWm ' ‘§- 1%?m $ aim 311%?! m 200 WWW ammm W" Wm Wm (We) Warsaw #Z/ Accordingly, the writ petitiv to the petitioner to tile represent: within 1o days from the date of WW§WW §aim3n§¥r )n is dieposed of with a direction ttion to the authorities cancemed receipt of copy of this crder; the same woultt be decided by thLauthoritiee concerned within a further period of three weeks fro accordance with lewd Tit! then ' given effect to and the petitione present ptace of posting the date of its receipt strictly in he order impugned shalt not be r shatt be eiiowed to work in her sdl- ' LI Pritinker Diwaker 5 " Judge l i l t