IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25133 of 2010 VINAY KUMAR SHARMA, SON OF LATE NAGESHWAR SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 27.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution case is that the Informant was threatened of dire consequence by the accused persons for not allotting some contractual work to the accused persons. The further prosecution case was that one of the accused persons shot at the leg of the Informant due to which he was injured. Right after the occurrence, the petitioner was arrested with Arms which was allegedly used in the present transaction and he also confessed his complicity in the present occurrence. It has fairly been submitted that the petitioner has criminal antecedents. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious nature of the offence. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)