IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.7657 of 2009 Between: Dr. Sree Mala & others. … Petitioners And The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : None Counsel for respondents 1 to 4: AGP for Home This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.7657 of 2009 ORDER:- In this writ petition the grievance of the petitioners is that at the instance of respondent Nos.5 to 7, respondent Nos.2 to 4 have been summoning them to the police station and interfering in the civil disputes between them on the one side and respondent Nos.5 to 7 on the other. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. In the counter affidavit filed by respondent No.2, he specifically denied interference by respondent Nos.1 to 4 in the civil disputes. He further stated that on 20.04.2009, petitioner No.2 approached the police with a complaint against the private respondents and that crime No.93 of 2009 was registered on the same day. It is further stated that during the investigation, five witnesses were examined and their statements under Section 161 Cr.P.C. were recorded and that all the five witnesses so far examined corroborated the facts stated in the FIR. It is further stated that accused No.4 – Uppari Surender, son of Laxmaiah was arrested and produced before the jurisdictional Magistrate on 21.04.2009 and that the remaining accused are absconding. The contents of the counter affidavit reveal that while the petitioners’ allegation of interference in civil disputes is denied, the complaint made by petitioner No.2 was registered as a criminal case and investigation is commenced. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of by placing on record the contents of the counter affidavit referred to above. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.10053 of 2009 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 02.06.2009 ES