1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3068 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2651 OF 2006 Ranjanaben Harish Ganatra ........Applicant versus Harshad P. Doshi & anr.........Respondents. Mr. V.Y. Sanglikar adv. for the Applicant. Mr. P.S. Dani adv. for the Respondents. CORAM: B. R. GAVAI, J. DATED : 6th September, 2010. P.C.: 1. By way of the present civil application, the applicant has applied for direction to the Court Receiver to take necessary police protection for taking forcible possession of the suit premises. 2. Mr. Dani, learned counsel appearing for the non applicant states that the suit premises is not a shop premises and is only a residential premises. He however submits that the non applicant has no objection for handing over the possession. 3. The order passed by this court on 26-2-2006 is clear. The court has directed the Court Receiver to take possession of the suit premises as described in prayer clause (a) of the civil application. The question as to whether the suit premises are shop or residential would not be a relevant issue at this stage. Since the suit premises is specifically described in prayer clause (a) of the C.A. No.5082/08, the non applicant to hand over the possession to 2 the Court Receiver within a period of one week from today. It is made clear that if the possession is not given to the the Court receiver, the Court Receiver shall take necessary police protection and take forcible possession from the non- applicant as described by the Court Receiver in his report dated. 31-3-2009. C.A. Is disposed of. (B. R. GAVAI, J.)