IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY THURSDAY, THE 14TH JULY 2011 / 23RD ASHADHA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 2128 of 2011 ------------------------- CRMP.2226/2011 of SESSIONS COURT, KOTTAYAM CC.216/2011 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS - I, ETTUMANUR .................... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED ---------------------- STANLY SIMON,AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.SIMON THOMAS,ASANPARAMBIL,FLAT NO.47, PEDANILAM SOCIETY, KANGAZHA PO,KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.T.SURESHKUMAR SRI.RAAJESH.S.SUBRAHMANIAN RESPONDENT(S): STATE/COMPLAINANT -------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM,KOCHI-31 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.MC.No. 2128 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT: Annexure A: Copy of order dated 11-7-2011 in Crl.M.P.No.2226/2011 of the Court of Sessions Kottayam. // True copy // P.A. to Judge B.P.RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C.No.2128 OF 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 14th day of July, 2011 ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. Petitioner is arrayed as an accused in C.C.No.216 of 2011 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ettumanoor for the offence punishable under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioner to modify the conditions imposed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kottayam in C.M.P.No.2226 of 2011, dated 11-7-2011, which are as follows: “1. The petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing bond for Rs.1,00,000/- with two local solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ettumanoor. 2. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of this court until trial of the case is completed. 3. The petitioner shall furnish his residential address in the trial court and also to the Sub Inspector of Police, Gandhinagar Police Station.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that it may not be possible for him to comply with condition Nos.1 and 2 as the petitioner is involved in similar cases before different courts and the petitioner is not in a position to furnish local surety and he has to appear before different Police Stations as directed by different courts. Crl.M.C.No.2128 OF 2011 :: 2 :: 4. Learned Public Prosecutor states that stringent conditions would be imposed, if the order is modified by this court. 5. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, condition No.1 is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall furnish cash security of Rs.40,000/-, which shall be kept in the name of the Judge in charge of the Accounts till the disposal of the above mentioned case, as agreed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ettumanoor. Petitioner shall appear before the Sub Inspector of Police, Gandhinagar Police Station, once in a month for a period of three months. Petitioner shall appear on each day fixed for trial. I direct the trial court to expedite the trial and complete the same preferably at the end of March 2012. Crl.M.C. is disposed of. B.P.RAY, JUDGE jes