BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Saturday, the Twelfth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14591 of 2011 1. ARRAYEE 2. SARAVANAN, 3. NAMBIRAJAN, ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 4 Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ULAGAMPATTI, THIRUPPATHUR TALUK, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.69 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. C.SUNDARAVADIVEL Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offence under section 366 of I.P.C. in Crime No.69 of 2011 on the file of the respondent Police, the petitioners have come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, one Dhanalakshmi @ Ammu has been abducted. The girl has not been recovered so far. 3. In my considered opinion, unless the whereabouts of the girl is known, it is not at all possible for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. In such view of the matter, this petition deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. sd/- 12/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ULAGAMPATTI, THIRUPPATHUR TALUK, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. SR : 16.11.2011 : 1P/3C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14591 of 2011 Date :12/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/