HIGH C(3URT CF CHH‘xTTiSG‘ RH‘ 3ILA$PUR Writ Petition (SB N0. 4413 of 2908 Ghasi Lai Mahilane, Slo. Late Nakul Mahi!ane, Aged abaut 66 years, rfc‘ vinage & Post Godam‘ Biock Sarangarh, Distt'. Raigarh (Chhaitisgam). Versu§ 1) $tate 9f Chhattisgarh thrcugh the Secretary, Schoo; Educaticn Departmarat‘ D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Districi Raipur (CG). 2) The Accountant (BeneraL Raipur, District Ra§pw (CG). 3) The District Educat§on Officer, Raigarh, Dismct Raigarh (CG . 4) Block Education Ofmer, Block Sarangarh, Dista’ict Raigarh (CG). ?etitioner Respondents " (Writ Petition under Articies 226 of the Constitution of india) $ingie Bench : Hcn’bie $hri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Sengay Pate!, ceunselforthe petmener. smt. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer fer the State. ORAL eReER (Passed nn mien“! day ei August, 2998) Wikh coneent of ieamed counse! appearing for the parties, the matter s heard finaiiy. 2) ,This case pertains to grievance of non-grant of retirai dues. 3) This Court, in the matter of.W.P.N0.4642f2004 (3aijhaih Mandal Vs“ The $tate of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retriai does as the disputed question of facts were invoived. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19e06-2006 passed in W.P.No.196112006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), and order dated t3—3-2008 passed in MCI). No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandat and - another). Thus, this petition is squareiy covered by the judgment and order i éated 319‘ Ja.ua.y, 20GB passed in WFNQ. 4642.!20Q4 {BaLinath Manda? (sapra) ) as submmed by ‘earned ccunsei appearmg for the parties. 4) ThSS petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e., the office of the Advocate Genera! is difected to send the case to the Commmee, within a period cf 1S days from the date of receipt of a copy of thés omer. Thereafter, the Committee shalt issue notice to the petitioner and officers concerned within a further period of t5 daysr The Committee shaii consider and pass orcier! in accordance with iaw, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned mav file additionai documents, it necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retirai dues, if any, to the petitioner! be compieted within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5) The petitioner shalt supply one compiete set of the petition to the State counsel for transferring the same to the Committee“ 6) in case of grievance with regard to non-payment of pensionery dues, it is not necessary to file a writ petition before this Court directivr The representation/’application can be moved before the Pension Committee as stated above. The Pension Committee shalt not refuse to entertain the representation/application, if so fiied directiy. Sd/- i Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i i