1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Fifth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15223 of 2011 JEYAPAUL ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.3 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THUCKLAY POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, CR NO. 1208/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. C.MAYIL VAGANA RAJENDRAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 427, 447, 379 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.1208 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police. He has approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Heard Mr.C.Mayil Vagana Rajendran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he did not commit any crime as stated in the complaint. He would submit that due to civil dispute, he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would also submit that he is also having permanent residence and therefore, he would request for the grant of anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, suitable conditions may be passed for the secured presence of the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to all the petitioner, of course, subject to certain stringent conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the Judicial Magistrate concerned on executing bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Padmanabhapuram, and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for the purpose of interrogation. 7. The petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 25/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PADMANABHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THUCKLAY POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. C.MAYIL VAGANA RAJENDRAN Advocate SR. No.41541 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15223 of 2011 Date :25/11/2011 RJ/28.11.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/