IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.29506 of 2008 BHUNESHWAR YADAV @ LUTAN YADAV & ORS. Vrs. THE STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 19.08.2008 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. In the first information report it has been alleged that there is case and counter case in between the parties. As per the allegation in the first information report the informant and other persons of Atari P.S. Case No. 59 of 2003 had kidnapped the son of the informant when he went in the company of petitioner for talking about the compromise. Counsel for the petitioners submits that now the parties have compromised. The son of the informant has returned back and a compromise petition has been filed by the petitioners as well as the informant in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in both the cases, i.e., Atari P.S. Case No. 59 of 2003 and Civil Line P.S. Case No. 198 of 2004. 3. Considering the facts, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners, namely, (1) Bhuneshwar Yadav @ Lutan Yadav, (2) Kavindar Yadav, (3) Umesh Yadav, (4) Shambhu Yadav and (5) Latan Yadav, is allowed. They are directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in case of 2 their surrender before the Court concerned within four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 198 of 2004 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )