BEFDRE THE MJE’. Ty“? ADNENIS“ A}. TFIHIx T JABAL@UR. ‘ EaAt NO- 70F 1994. wymcm‘r :- 1. Kumari Kalpana Tiw arid/o Shri- Raw Shankar Tiwari, age§ 28 yeass; Occupa— “1 ticm "e$hing, xesi&aent of ?ande Ashram §amsaptah ChOWk, Bhatapara, District Raizmr (M.P.). / IL 3m; ,g. _..._ REESPaNgENTS .- 12. 8t ate 0f Madhya Fraziesh through the secretary, Callege Riucation, Vallabh f Haawan (M.P. ) . \ ‘ i 2. Director , College “Etucation, Birecco— r4 4" rate ot’ College time atian, §atpula mawan, Empal, Joint Birector, Gollege mac atian, Directorake of College Educatimn, Satpu la Bhavvzn, Bhopal. j; QPPLEGAgg UNBER SDC'TL'DN 19 OH TEE ADMENTSTRATZEVE] . ‘TaxwNALggg ‘1‘9857. L [ ‘ w/ HIGH COURI‘ OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (s) No. 955 of 2005 Peu'tioner : Kumari Kalpana Tiwari Versus Respondents Sfate of Madhya Pmd¢sh 8r. others Single Bench: Hon’bk Mr; Justice Satish K. wotti. Shn' Awadh ’I‘n‘pathi, counsel for the Petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel lawyer for the Respondents] Stale. ORAL ORDER (13th July, 2006) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the pcu'tioner was untally appointed as Lecturer in Hindi at the Government College, Bilaigarh Kasdol w.e.f. 10.9.90 for 89 days and hie appointment was renewed 11'me and again after a break of one day. Learned counsel for the petih‘oner further submits that the peu'h‘oner ma‘iie an application in response to the advertisement issued by the respondent/W for emergency appointment on the post of Assistant Professor . 3 According to learned counsel for the peh‘tioner, the petitioner was not selected. The petitioner‘womd have been given 50.88 in acoordanoe with the provisions as prescribed on the post of Assistant Professor for emergency appointment. The respondents] State has nled its return stated that the pen'tioner has received 46.85 percent marks and accordingly he was placed at serial No. 264. The person, who has received 49.84 per cent marks @ piaoed at sen'al No. 117, was given appointment. Be that as it may, it appears that the u'tioner has no right to the appointment on the of his marks, in aocordanoe with law. -Learned counsel appealing for the msponden&/Siatc has no objech'on. The petitioner is permitted to make a repxesentation to the k mspondents/State to consider the case of the pen'tbner on its own merit, in acconiance with law, as expedih’ous as possEle. The etition is aordingly disposed 012 No cider as to costs. , Sd/L ; ‘Sau‘sh K. Agu'hou'i Judge pe p cc