- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 2786 OF APPLICATION No. 2786 OF APPLICATION No. 2786 OF 2006 IN FIRST APPEAL No. 711 OF 2005 Narayan Narayan Narayan B. Khande B. Khande B. Khande .... .... .... Applicant Applicant Applicant Vs. Vs. Vs. Smt. Smt. Smt. Ashabai L. Jagtap & Ors. ... Respondent Ashabai L. Jagtap & Ors. ... Respondent Ashabai L. Jagtap & Ors. ... Respondent Mr. V. S. Talkute, advocate for applicant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. : JUNE 20, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By the Civil Application, the applicant is seeking recall of conditional order dated 12th January, 2006. The only grievance in the application is that applicant has served all the respondents within time. However, he could not serve respondent No. 2E and 2F. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, sufficient cause is made out. However, the learned counsel for the applicant states that said respondent Nos. 2E and 2F would be served with Civil Application within four weeks. Hence, Civil Application stands disposed of in terms of prayer Clauses(a), (b) and (c). [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]