a^.- (vv^ ^r^ ^ S IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.Gl / W.P.(SINO. //^l OF 2010 PETITIONER ^ o....•••""" ^^^-^.. i.'-''-'-"L _.,..••" , ^s^^^ a' '^•""°" VERSUS Yashwant Sukdeve, aged about 19 years, S/o Late Hazari Lal Sukdeve, R/o Village Subhiyamudpar, Tahsil Kanker, Distt. North Baster kanker (G.G.) RESPONDENTS ^" :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) r' 2. Collector ( Land Record Branch) BaQtor, Distt. North jgaster Kanker (C.G.) ^ 3. The Tahsildar, Kanker Distt. North BasterKanker(C.G.) 4. State of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA j-HC—78 *<1*1CTI ^w^» 'S^f ^WW^, ^•^\W\Vo, fs|<v1iyl|< ^^).^A.&^•^200 3'TI^T T^R7 (^?rf3s^?) ^Tl^T -cFT r<'|jcb ffl ^KIIW ^f^a 31T^T ^FFlfepft^ TTI^ff ^* fe^ <f^l^l< '^3rtRm3T^?T S.B: HON'BLE JUSTICE IVIR. PR3TJNKER DIWAKER 09-09-2010: ,1 ;Siiri,El.jNif?gi%!apatL courtself<| ?E1i1^l&!rit?:PL for the s?al Sfin^MlaJay'^Shrivastava, Ad'j Shrivastwa, counlfei for respondent| Cbunse! forthe petitloner sul:| the petitigner is permitted to f| respondents No. 2 & 3 raislng ail hl^ the present petitlon and in turn th^ ^r the petitioner. le/respondents No. 1 to 3. l^ocate on behaif of the Shri Rajeev |No. 4. |mits that ends of justice would ser^e If |le .fresh representatlon before the ^ grievances vvhich have been ralsed in said respondents rnay be directed to decide the said representation expe^.itiousiy in accordance with law. Learned counse! for.the Stat^ submlts that iet the petltioner make a representatlon before the responde hts No. 2 & 3 and the same v'/ould be decided in accordance with !aw. The petitlon js disposed o^ wlth the aforesaid dlrection. in the eventuality of fiiing any such repr^ respondents No. 2 & 3 ralsing ail respondents to dedde the same cor|sidering ali the factual and .tegal aspect of the case as expeditiously as poss] 11 is made ciear that this Cd merits ofthe case and the authorlty| th.e representation. of the petltioner s| [sentation by the petitioner before the |?iis grievance, it is expected from the bie. |urt has not expressed any opinion on ^oncerned would be at liberty to decide trictiy in accordance with law. ^n^el ^ QV PO^d^ 1-.