IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.10356 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 9th August, 2010 Baljit Singh and others … Petitioners Versus Municipal Corporation, Faridabad and another … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Anil Shukla, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate for the respondents. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Civil Misc. No. 10614 of 2010 CM is allowed and Annexure P-30 is taken on record. Civil Writ Petition No.10356 of 2009 The present writ petition seeks quashing of impugned orders (notice) dated 23rd June, 2009 (Annexures P-21 to P-29) whereby petitioners have been directed by Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Faridabad to appear before him with concerned documents of possession to facilitate allotment of vegetable selling site. Counsel for the respondents has stated that only show- cause-notice has been issued to the petitioners to appear before the authorities and prove their possession. Learned counsel has further Civil Writ Petition No.10356 of 2009 (O&M) stated that after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, a detailed speaking order shall be passed. Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that this Court has already ordered that status quo be maintained during the pendency of the writ petition, therefore, in case any order is passed adverse to the rights of the petitioners, the same be not implemented for a period of two months in order to afford an opportunity to the petitioners to approach the Court of competent jurisdiction. After hearing counsel for the parties, I am of the considered opinion that the offer made by both the counsel for the parties is fair and just in the circumstances of the present case. Accordingly, present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction that the petitioners shall appear before the authorities on 30th August, 2010. Thereafter, the authorities, after noticing the contentions of the petitioners, shall pass a detailed speaking order. The order so passed shall not be implemented for a period of two months. Till the passing of the order and two months thereafter, status quo shall be maintained. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE August 9, 2010 rps 2