1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8751 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2249 OF 2009 Rajesh s/o Gangabishan Baheti ...Applicant VERSUS Naresh s/o Vishnu Kotarwar and others ...Respondents ..... Shri B.A.Shinde, advocate h/f Shri V.P.Latange, advocate for the applicant Smt. Maya Jamdade, advocate for respondent no.1 Shri V.B.Ghatge, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 2 and 3 ..... CORAM : S.B.DESHMUKH AND SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, JJ. DATED : 6 th October, 2010 PER COURT : 1 We heard Shri B.A.Shinde, advocate h/f Shri V.P.Latange, advocate for the applicant, Smt. Maya Jamdade, advocate for respondent no.1 and Shri V.B.Ghatge, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 2 and 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that copies of Civil Application have been served to respondent nos. 5 2 and 6. None appears for respondent nos. 5 and 6. 2 In our opinion, present application needs to be allowed, for the reason that applicant was allegedly appointed by respondent nos. 5 and 6 for some time and approval was also granted for some years. We are inclined to allow this Civil Application and we are also inclined to grant permission to present applicant to file affidavit in reply, if he so desires. 3 Accordingly, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' and disposed of. Respondent no.1 (original petitioner) is directed to join present applicant as party respondent to the Writ Petition. Such addition to be carried out within one week. We grant time and liberty in favour of added respondent to file affidavit in reply, if he desires to do so, thereafter after one week. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) dbm/ca8751.09