IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7752 of 2010 1. MD.AKRAM 2. Md. Kalamuddin Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 15.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission on behalf of the petitioners in a Police case under Sections 323, 324, 354, 498A and 307/34 of the Penal Code is of subsequent compromise when matrimonial harmony is alleged to have been restored and parties are residing as man and wife. The duty of the Courts in such matters has been explained by the Supreme Court in A.I.R. 2003 SC 1386 and in so far as bail matters are concerned it has been discussed by this Court in 2006(3) PLJR 182 and 2006(4) PLJR 342. The matter is remanded to the Court of the Sessions Judge, Katihar to rehear the application of regular bail in light of the aforesaid discussion for calling for the personal appearance of the alleged victim and satisfy itself that matrimonial harmony has been restored. Let this order be communicated in connection with B. P. No. 1181 of 2009 to the Court of 2 Sessions Judge, Katihar by the Court through FAX when such fresh orders are required to be passed within a maximum period of one week from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The application is disposed off. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)