IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39759 of 2010 PRAVEEN KUMAR SINGH S/O LATE SATYENDRA NARAYAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PACHARA LAKSHMIPUR, P.S. TARIYANI, DISTRICT SHEOHAR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.12.2010. Heard Shri Uday Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Amrendra Kumar Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, who is in custody in Complaint Case No.C1-219 of 2004 for the offence under Section 304(B) and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially on the basis of information furnished by the complainant, an F.I.R. vide Tariyani P.S. Case No.83 of 2003 was registered. However, after investigation, the allegation made by the complainant/informant was found as un-true and as such final form was submitted. In the said case, a protest petition was filed, which was treated as complaint case vide Complaint Case No.C1-219 of 2004. After conducting enquiry, the learned Magistrate took cognizance of the offence. Despite the fact that order of cognizance was passed in the year 2006, the petitioner remained absconding and thereafter, he surrendered on 27.8.2010 and since 2 N.H./ then he is in custody. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for bail and it was submitted that conduct of the petitioner indicates that he has got no respect for the law and, accordingly, the prayer for bail may be rejected. In view of the fact that the allegation was initially investigated thoroughly by the statutory investigating agency and was found not true, the court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for extending the privilege of grant of bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sheohar at Sitamarhi in Tariyani P.S. Case No.83 of 2003. ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)