Review Application No. 106 of 2011(O&M) in -1- CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 18281 OF 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. DATE OF DECISION: May 06 , 2011. Parties Name Harbans Kaur and others ...PETITIONERS VERSUS State of Punjab and others ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih PRESENT: Mr. Harjot Singh Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioners Jasbir Singh, J. (oral) Order. C.M. No.3937 of 2011 Allowed as prayed for. C.M. No.3938 of 2011 In view of reasons mentioned in this application, it is allowed and 88 days delay in filing the review application stands condoned. Review Application No. 106 of 2011(O&M) in -2- CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 18281 OF 2007 R.A. No.106 of 2011 This application has been filed with a prayer to recall an order dated 15.12.2010, by stating that contention raised by the petitioners regarding validity of the award was not considered by this Court. It is apparent from the record that after passing of the above said judgment by this Court, the petitioners had not come to the Court by raising above said grievance, rather, they preferred to go to the Hon’ble Supreme Court by filing SLP, which was disposed of by passing the following order on 21.2.2011:- “These petitions are directed against order dated 15.12.2010 of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioners questioning the acquisition of their land under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922. After arguing the case for some time, Shri G.S. Grewal, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioners made a request that his clients may be permitted to withdraw the special leave petitions with liberty to seek review of the order under challenge because a number of points raised in the writ petition and replication and argued before the High Court have not been heard by the Division Bench. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the special leave petitions are dismissed in terms of the prayer made. However, it is made clear that liberty given to the petitioners to file review petition shall not be construed as a mandate of this Court to the High Court to entertain the review petition and if any such petition is filed, the High Court shall decide the same on its own merits.” We are of the opinion that at the time of hearing of writ petition, Review Application No. 106 of 2011(O&M) in -3- CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 18281 OF 2007 whatever points were argued/raised before this Court, the same were noted down and dealt with at the time when order dated 15.12.2010 was passed. No case is made out for interference. Dismissed. ( Jasbir Singh ) Judge (Augustine George Masih) Judge May 06 , 2011. DKC