1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1675 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.681 OF 1992 Pandurang Dattaba Dhisal. ..Applicant. Vs. Mansukhalal D.Shan through his L.R.s. ..Respondents. Mr.S.S.Patwardhan for the Applicant. Mr. P.S.Narang for the Respondents. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 4TH JANUARY, 2010 PC : 1 Heard both sides. 2 This is an application for restoration of the second appeal. It is seen that, second appeal was dismissed for non prosecution on 10.10.2007. The contention is that the name of the Advocate for the appellant was not shown on the board. No reply is filed to this application. Hence, for the reasons which are mentioned in the application and 2 which are accepted, civil application is allowed and the second appeal is restored to file. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1676 OF 2009 IN S.A.NO.681 OF 1992 1 Heard both sides. 2 This is an application for bringing the legal heirs of the sole appellant on record. Although there is no prayer for abatement, in my view, civil application can be allowed. In the circumstances, civil application is allowed and rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1677 OF 2009 IN S.A.NO.681 OF 1992 1 Heard both sides. 2 Rule. By consent, rule made returnable forthwith. 3 This is an application for bringing the 3 legal heirs of the deceased respondent No.1(ii) on record. The heirs are respondent Nos. 2a and 2b. In the circumstances, for the reasons which are mentioned in the application and which are accepted, application is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within one week from today. (R.S.MOHITE, J.)