IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.R.BANNURMATH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2010 / 30TH POUSHA 1931 RP.No. 628 of 2009 ------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.2404/2006 Dated 26/02/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/SECOND RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------------------------------- THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (RURAL). BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPALA NAMBIAR RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT & RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. S.RAGHAVAN, S.R.MOTORS, S.R.BUILDING, VARKALA. 2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (RURAL). 3. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV.SRI.STALIN PETER DAVIS R2 & R3 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.R.Bannurmath, C.J. & Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. ------------------------------------------ R.P. No.628 of 2009 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of January, 2010 ORDER S.R.Bannurmath, C.J. This review petition is filed seeking review of the judgment dated 26th February, 2009 passed by a Division Bench of this Court allowing the writ appeal after quashing Ext.P1 and remanding the matter to the Regional Transport Authority to reconsider the matter afresh after giving opportunity to both the parties. 2. Keeping in view the limited scope of exercise of jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in our view, unless the contentions raised in the review petition fall strictly within the ambit of (i) error apparent on the face of the records, (ii) materials which were R.P.No.628 of 2009 2 though available not produced and looked into, error of law, typographical mistake, etc. The grounds raised in this review petition, in our view, do not fall within the purview of these categories of cases, especially when it is an open remand to the Regional Transport Authority to reconsider the matter afresh with sufficient opportunity even to the review petitioner to represent his case. Hence, we find no merit in the review petition and the same is dismissed. S.R.Bannurmath, Chief Justice Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge vns