HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION No:10348 OF 2007 Dated: 04.06.2007 Between: K. Srinivasa Rao ..Petitioner And 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep., By its Special Chief Secretary, LET & F Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad and another. ..Respondents. HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION No:10348 OF 2007 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) The present writ petition has been filed aggrieved by the order, dated 03.05.2007 passed by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, in O.A.No.1759 of 2007. The main grievance of the petitioner in the said O.A. is that he was transferred and posted as Inspector of Fisheries from Tenali to Anantapur under the political influence vide proceedings No.A1/5553/2006, dated 26.03.2007 and therefore, the said proceedings are liable to be set aside. On the other hand, the respondents filed their counter before the Tribunal contending that on the earlier occasion, the petitioner was put on disciplinary proceedings and his increments were stopped and that the transfer of the petitioner was affected only on the administrative grounds. On hearing the rival contentions of both the parties, the Tribunal having held that the transfer of the applicant is affected on the administrative grounds and no malifides can be attributed to anybody in this regard, dismissed the application. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is filed. We have perused the order impugned as well as the transfer proceedings. On a perusal of the material available on record, it is obvious that the transfer of the petitioner was affected only on administrative grounds. Therefore, the contention of the petitioner that his transfer was done due to political interference, does not stand to ground. Apart from that, in a case of this nature, the action falls within the domain of the administration of the authorities, in which, the Courts will not generally interfere with the same. However, if really, the petitioner is aggrieved, nothing prevents him from approaching the appropriate authorities instead of approaching the Tribunal without any basis. In the above facts and circumstances, we have no hesitation to hold that the order of the Tribunal does not suffer from any illegality and legal infirmity and therefore, we see no merits in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari ________________________ Justice S. Ananda Reddy Date: 4th June, 2007 Nn/Gurc. HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION No:10348 OF 2007 (Order delivered by the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) 04/06/2007 CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:744 OF 2005 28.1.2006