BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Seventeenth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9491 of 2011 MOHAN @ MOHANA SUNDARAM ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE UPPILIYAPURAM POLICE STATION, IN CR.NO.252 OF 2011, TRICHY DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate For Respondent : MR. A. RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused arrest t the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 307 IPC. In Crime No. 252 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is running a tailor shop in front of a petty shop. On 22.07.2011 the de facto complainant and others are said to have come to the petty shop and developed a wordy quarrel with the woman who is running the petty shop and at that time the de facto complainant attacked the petitioner and the petitioner in order to take self defence he attacked the de facto complainant. He further submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the alleged occurrence took place on 22.07.2011 and the petitioner is running a Tailor shop in front of a petty shop. The de facto complainant and others purchased some things from the petty shop but they did not pay any money. Hence, a dispute arose between the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner and the de facto complainant at that time he has attacked the de facto complainant by using knife and caused injuries and the investigation is going on. He further submits that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions, that the alleged occurrence took place on 22.07.2011, the injured discharged from the hospital, and even though the petitioner was not arrested he neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur, Trichy District, and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur, Trichy District, and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 am., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before th concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 17/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THURAIYUR, TIRUCHY DIST 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIA MAGISTRATE, TIRUCHY 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE UPPILIYAPURAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. 1. CC to M/S. B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate SR.No.28096: DM::2011:AUGUST:19:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9491 of 2011 2p:6c:: Date :17/08/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/