SPLA No. 108 of 2011 CRLA No. 225 of 2011 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. G.C. Lakhchaura, Advocate, present for the appellant/complainant. Mr. M.K. Ray, Advocate, present for the accused/respondents. This is Leave to Appeal Application No. 108 of 2011, seeking leave to appeal against judgment and order dated 06.08.2011, passed by 2nd Additional Judicial Magistrate, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar, in Criminal Complaint Case No. 1960 of 2010 (Old No. 67 of 2008), whereby said court has acquitted the accused/respondents Vijay Vishwash, Arindam Vishwas and Smt. Anila Vishwash from the charge of offences punishable under Section 323, 498A of I.P.C., and one punishable under Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. Perusal of the impugned judgment and order passed by the trial court shows that the marriage between the complainant/appellant Manju Vishwash and the accused/respondent No.1 Vijay Vishwash was a love marriage. The trial court took a view that in such a case, the allegation of demand of dowry is not a convincing one, As to the allegation of offence punishable under Section 323 of I.P.C., the trial court has observed that there was no medical report suggesting that the hurt was caused by the accused/respondents. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, and after going through the impugned judgment and order passed by the trial court, this Court is of the view that it is not a fit case for granting leave to appeal. Accordingly, leave is refused. Leave to Appeal Application No. 108 of 2011, stands disposed of. Also, the appeal is dismissed summarily. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 13.09.2012 JM