Applicant , C.J. Non-a ,J Tam Singh, aged about 32 years, S./o Shri Punit Ram Sahu, R/o Krantikari Chowk, Tikrapara P.S. Tikrapara, Raipur Tah. & Distt. Raipur (C,G.) Jasprit Singh (Devendra Singh), S/o Shri Ajit Singh, R/o Govindpur, Makadi Dhaba, Tah. P.S. & Dist. Kanker (C.G.) Iffco Tokeo General insurance Co. Ltd., 3 Floor, Lalganga Shopping Mall, G.E. Road, Dist. Raipur $G.G.) Harbansh Singh, S/o Mahender Singh R/o Govindpur, Makadi Dhaba, Tah. P.S. & Distt. Kanker (C.G.) Motor Vehicies Act Present : Shri Sk Guha, counsei for the appellant. Shri Amrito Das, counsel for respondent No.2. >nd The following order of the ,Court was passed by Learned counsel for the partjes are heard on IA No.1/2010, a petition for condonation of the delay 'in fiting the appeal. 2) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counel for the parties and the grounds taken in the application, we are satlsfied that the appellant has succeeded in showing sufficient cause Tor the delay in filing the appea!. 3) IA No. 1/2010, therefore, is allowed and the detay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. 4) Shri SK Guha, !earned counsei for the appellant is heard on admission. 5) Appetlant Tam Singh is seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Second Additional Motor Accident Ciaims Tribunai, Raipur (for short 'the Tribunal') vide award dated 20.01.2009, passed in Claim Case No. 117/2008. 2) As against the compensation of Rs.9,00,000/-, claimed by the appellant/claimant by filing a claim petition under Section 1 66 of the Motor Vehicles Act, for the injuries sustained by him in the motor accident on 26.05.2006, the Tribunal awarded a totai sum of Rs.11,100/- as compensation to the claimants aiong with interest 7% per annum from the date of the fiting of the claim petition till the date of actua! payment. 3) Shri SK Guha, learned counsel for the appeliant vehemently argued that the Tribunal has erred in awarding iow compensation of Rs.11,100/- only, though the appeltant/ciaimant sustained multiple serious injuries including fractures in the motor accident resulting in permanent disability to the extent of 25%. Fi- f^.. 4) The unfortunate accident in which claimant Tam Singh claims to have sustained injuries and fractures took place on 26.05.2006. The alieged disabiiity certificate was issued by AW/2 Dr VK Pandey after 1 % years of the accident on 03.11.2007. The ciaimant is resident of Raipur and he was treated at Raipur, but, surprisingly, the dlsability certificate has been issued by Dr VK Pandey who was posted at Dhamtari. Dr VK Pandey admittedly never treated claimant Tam Singh for the injuries sustained by him in the motor accident. The bills and vouchers produced by the ciaimant before the Tribunal were to the extent of Rs.5,548/- and the Tribuna! has awarded Rs.5,600/- towards medical expenses. 5) The compensation of Rs.11,100/- awarded by the Tribunal when examined in the context of the above mentloned broad features of the case, in our opinion, is just and proper compensation and does not call for any enhancement in this 6) The appeal filed by the appellant/claimant for enhancement of the compensation, therefore, fails and is hereby dismissed summarily. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge padma