Fiieo'icdayigg.. F by Shri(,%:.c.&..;. i ,or Mgfsz‘rar, M P Séate Aé‘m, Tribunal, 'H'om ms'rATE nmmsmA-rIVE Tammmb BENCH RAIPUR Iv? 4 7 r/,/'.v‘/) K 1 (57> )K) " Dindayal‘: Sahu, aged 64 years. 5/0 Late Hajarilal, Retired Head Master. madle School, Lakhol 1 Naka ,, &a jnandgacn . A PH; ICANT REsIDENT OF-o: .No .MIG-m, Kaurinbhata Col ony. Road, Kamla College[ Rajnandgaon. VERSUS . noN‘APH. ICANTs : (L/ State Gdvt. cf Cnhattisgarh. (MW *Ww W WWHW DWI“ VxmyraW >~ R81 Put . W 2. The Accountant General, Madhya Radesh. Gwalior. . Senior Accounts Officer. effice of Accountant General. walior . :4. -Dis-trict Education Officer, Rajnandgaon. 5 Block Education Officer, v Ra jnandgacn . > APHJICATION U/S 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ACT,1985. . . i ‘ C-78 Y§“;\o\ \N VQ§ )M Wmmw .................... WWWW 2f3‘5’ oS‘ mzo WWW 311%21 mma'wm . aiwaniw ' SB : Hon’bte Shri Manindra Moha n Shrivastava, J. 22-01 -2010 Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Payash‘i, Panel Lawyer for the Statelrespondents. counsel for the parties, the petition is With the consent of learned heard flnany. This case pertains to grie‘ Learned codnse! appearing for thv that the matter may be referred tot This Court, in W.P.No.4642; of Chhattisgarh & others) and oti" Committee to consider the matter of of facts were involved. The Comr Government, pursuant to the or W.P.No.196’il2006 (Smtt Keja Bai ( Chhatti’sgarh and others), and orde No, 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattis and another). Thus! this petition is quarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31 5* January, 2008 pa sed in W.P.i\lo.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by lear ed counselrappearing for the parties, / This petition is accordingly isposed of tn the same terms i.e.1 the office of the Advocate General i directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 da s from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committ e shall issue notice to the petitioner and officersconcerne'd Within a furt er period of 15 days. The Committee \ \ rance of non-grant of retirat dues. e petitioner, on instructions, submits 1e Pension Committee, 2004 (Baijnath Manda! Vs. The State er connected matters, directed the retrial dues as the disputed question wittee was constituted by the State der dated woe-2006 passed in :handrakar Vs. State Government of r dated 13434008 passed in MC‘C. arh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal . \ amtW (W) .\ WNW mm amiai :1. 593/ .? (11a 20 31mm (W) mmmma J1 shal! consider and pass order, in proper opportunity of hearing to officers concerned may frle addition exercise, including payment. of ret mm#% $31%q3né21 petitioner. The petitioner and the i documents, if necessary. The entire dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed within a period of four mo ths from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall suppiy State counsel as well as cou transferring the' same to the Commi Tumane ne complete set of the petition to the for the Accountant General for i Se, Sdéhan 5"“waitava “ accordance with law, after affording t i i n l