THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WVMP.No.2257 of 2007 AND WRIT PETITION. No.3426 of 2007 Date: 17.01.2008 Between: Maadireddy Satyavathi … Petitioner AND The District Collector, East Godavari District at Kakinada & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri K. Venkatesh Counsel for the respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WVMP.No.2257 of 2007 AND WRIT PETITION. No.3426 of 2007 ORDER:- WVMP.No.2257 of 2007 is filed to vacate interim order dated 22.02.2007 passed in WPMP.No.4369 of 2007 in Writ Petition No.3426 of 2007. With the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. The proposed acquisition under notification dated 05.01.2007 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, ‘the Act’) by respondent No.1 is assailed in this writ petition on the sole ground that the land proposed to be acquired is an agricultural land and that its acquisition without conversion for non-agricultural purposes is contrary to the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Land (Conversion of Non-Agricultural Purposes) Act, 2006. This Court in a batch of writ petitions, namely, Writ Petition No.18881 of 2006 and batch disposed on 28.12.2007 rejected a similar contention. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed with the direction that the detailed reasons contained therein shall be read as part of this order. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that in response to the notice issued under Section 5A of the Act, the petitioner filed her objections before respondent No.1, District Collector and that he has not so far passed any order on the said objections. In view of this submission, respondent No.1 is directed to dispose of the objections raised by the petitioner and in the event an adverse order is passed against the petitioner, liberty is given to her to challenge the same, if she is so advised. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.4369 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed. In view of dismissal of WPMP.No.4369 of 2007, WVMP.No.2257 of 2007 is also dismissed. C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 17.01.2008 ES