1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL SIDE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1076 OF 2009 Dindayal Khairatiram Kamwal. .. Petitioner Vs U.D. Mistry, the Assistant Municipal Commissioner & Anr. .. Respondents -- Shri Mohit Jadhav for the Petitioner. Smt. Geeta Jogalekar for the BMC. -- CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.M. KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2009 P.C. Learned counsel appearing for the Corporation submits that the Corporation has already issued notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 to the Petitioner and it will proceed with the same in accordance with law. However, if the Petitioner has any grievance that some unauhorised construction has been left out, the Corporation has no objection if the Petitioner approaches the concerned officer who will hear the Petitioner on his grievance. 2 2. In view of the above, nothing survives in this Petition. The same is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to approach the said officer within two weeks from today. CHIEF JUSTICE A.M.KHANWILKAR, J