THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.20941 of 2009 April 31, 2010 Between: Shivnarayana Nagla, S/o.Jagannathji Nagla … Petiti AND Nizamabad Municipal Corporation, represented by its Commissioner And others ... Respon THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.20941 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner is statedly owner of a house bearing door No.6-24-2304/2 situated at Gurbabadi street in Nizamabad District. The same was assess property tax by the Nizamabad Municipal Corporation – the respondent herein impugned notices dated 11.9.2009 and 18.9.2009, the petitioner was direct pay the arrears of property tax in a sum of Rs.1,54,867/- for the period 01.4.2002 to 09.10.2009. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner invoked jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. We have heard the Counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Couns the respondent Corporation. There is a dispute in relation to levy of the proper as well as the termination of annual rateable value. Both these are the questio fact and, therefore, ordinarily we would not be inclined to interfere at this s Further, Section 282(1) of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 19 made applicable to the Nizamabad Municipal Corporation. As per the provision, an appeal lies to the jurisdictional Court of the Senior Civil J Nizamabad. Therefore, it would be better, if the petitioner avails the remedy b seeking further redressal. We, therefore, reserve the liberty to the petition prefer appeal. Such appeal shall be filed within a period of fifteen days from t whereupon the jurisdictional Senior Civil Judge may entertain the appeal and appropriate orders in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. ____________ (V.V.S. RA __________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHA August 31, 2010 NOTE: Dispatch order copy by 03.9.2010. (By order) YS