IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37216 of 2009 1. SHOBHA DEVI 2. WAKIL SAH ---- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR --- OPP. PARTY. ----------- 02 20.11.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 420, 467 and 471 of the Penal Code. Allegation as per F.I.R. is that the lands which was settled in the name of grand father of the present petitioner no.2 and the informant by issuing a Basgit purcha has been manipulated to have been re-settled in the name of petitioner no.1 ( wife of petitioner no.2). Learned counsel for the petitioners, referring to the averments made in paragraph nos. 5 and 6 of the bail application, submits that in fact a different piece of land has been got settled in favour of the wife of petitioner no.2. It is next highlighted that the informant has already sold his land which is in violation of the terms of the settlement. It is, thus, contended that the present case raises a civil dispute. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount 2 each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Lakhisarai in connection with Suryagarha P.S. Case no. 51 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. It is made clear that one of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioners. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)