IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2175 of 2008 PARMILA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3. 09.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, for the State and for Opposite party no. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought to persuade this Court that anticipatory bail was granted to Opposite party no. 2 on previous occasion when the materials from the case diary were not placed properly. Be that as it may, that issue has lost its relevance now in view of the subsequent development that charge sheet has been submitted against Opposite party no. 2. The anticipatory bail granted on 3.9.2007 in Cr. Misc. No. 27907 of 2007 was limited during the period of investigation till submission of charge sheet. Learned counsel for Opposite party no. 2 acknowledges that charge sheet has been submitted and, therefore, the benefit of the order dated 3.9.2007 is no more available to him. The prosecuting agency is now expected to proceed in accordance with law. In that view of the matter, this application for cancellation has become infructuous. It is, accordingly, dismissed. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)