IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46428 of 2009 1. SHATRUGHAN YADAV 2. Naresh Yadav 3. Santosh yadav 4. Mohan Yadav Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 01.02.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application of petitioner no.1, inasmuch as during the pendency of the application, he has been arrested. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the prayer of petitioner no.1 is dismissed as withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that land dispute is there in between the parties and lathi used in the case inflicted simple injuries only followed by using butt of the pistol by one Shatrughan Yadav belies the allegation regarding intention to kill. Even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest which cannot be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned for the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 4 is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Ghoghardiha P.S. Case No. 46 of 2009, above 2 named petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 4 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Jhanjharpur, District Madhubani subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)