AB 1800/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. MERUNO Heard Mr. K. Paul, learned counsel for the applicant and also heard Mr. B.S. Sin ha,l earned Addl. P.P., Asssam. By this application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C., the applicant is p raying for pre-arrest bail in connection with Hajo P.S.Case No.102/2011 register ed under Sections 366(A)/34 IPC corresponding to CR Case No.40 of 2011. On 24-06-2011, this Court, in the interim, passed an interim bail grant ed to the petitioner and in compliance of the said interim bail order, the petit ioner has been made available before the Investigating Officer and his statement has also been recorded along with the statement of the victim girl. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that t he petitioner has already married the victim girl and accordingly, a marriage ce rtificate has also been issued on 23-01-2011 where the age of the victim girl ha s been recorded as 19 years. A compromise petition has also been submitted to the Officer-in-Charge o f the Hajo Police Station by the mother of the victim girl and some villagers, w ho have also appended their signatures on it. Further also the co-accused in th e aforesaid case have also been granted the pre-arrest bail, which was made abso lute by an order dated 10-06-2011. The learned Addl. P.P has produced the case diary and according to the l earned Addl. P.P, from the statements as recorded in the case diary, this Court presumes to be on the conclusion that the statement of the victim as well as the accused have already been recorded and also they have married each other. The only question before this Court with regards to the age of the victi m girl, since this case has been registered, under Section 366 A of the IPC, and on perusal of the documents annexed to this application, it has been noticed fr om the marriage certificate, where it has been recorded the age of the victim gi rl is 19 years. Presume it to be the correct age of the victim girl, beyond the circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that the interim bail grant ed on 24-06-2011 is made absolute with the same terms and conditions. With the above observations and directions, this application stands dis posed of.