:1: :1: :1: srp. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2846 OF 2007. WRIT PETITION NO. 2846 OF 2007. WRIT PETITION NO. 2846 OF 2007. Ghyanshyam Farande. ..Petitioners. Versus. The State of Maharashtra & Others..Respondents. --- R. V. Bansode for the petitioners. A. H. Palekar A.G.P. for the State. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & S. R. SATHE,JJ. S. R. SATHE,JJ. S. R. SATHE,JJ. DATE: JULY 2, 2007. DATE: JULY 2, 2007. DATE: JULY 2, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The Petitioner is challenging the appointment of the respondent no.4. The petitioner has participated in the selection process. However, he was not selected and thereafter he is pointing out the flaws in the procedure / process. However, it is not permissible for him. The main question so far as the petitioner is concerned is that he should have been given the opportunity to contest with other candidates for the said post. Having lost in the process, now the petitioner is challenging the process. If he was really interested in challenging the process he should have challenged it without participating in the process. Under these circumstances we refrain to entertain the petition. Petition is rejected. (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)