- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1288 OF 2002 WRIT PETITION NO.1288 OF 2002 WRIT PETITION NO.1288 OF 2002 Mansingrao Marutrao Shinde ...Petitioner vs. Sou.Uma @ Manik M.Shinde & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Prataprao Shinde for the Petitioner Ms M.H.Mhatre,A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : SEPTEMBER 8,2005 : SEPTEMBER 8,2005 : SEPTEMBER 8,2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The order under challenge is passed by the learned Judge of the Family Court in a proceeding under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Therefore, remedy of filing Revision Application under the provisions of Section 19 (4) of the Family Courts Act,1984 is available to the Petitioner. In view of availability of efficacious remedy under the said Act of 1984, Writ Petition is not maintainable. 2. In view of this position, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Petition with liberty to file Revision Application. He states that ad-interim order passed by this Court may be extended for a reasonable period to enable the Petitioner to take appropriate steps. 3. Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceedings to challenge the impugned order. Ad-interim relief which is operating in favour of the Petitioner till today will continue to operate for a period of four weeks from today. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE