IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.985 of 2008 VIVEKA SINGH @ VIVEKANAND SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 08.05.2009 Heard. The instant revision application is directed against the order dated 14.07.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-Ist, Barh in Sessions Trial Case No. 977 of 2008 arising out of Barh P.S. Case No. 242 of 2006, whereby he rejected the prayer of the petitioner not to frame charge against him under Section 302, 307, 147, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel submits that no police paper was supplied to the petitioner and it has wrongly been stated that the same has been supplied to the accused himself by the learned Magistrate. Learned counsel for the opposite party submits that the FIR annexed in this application is of Barh P.S. Case No 454 of 1995 whereas the case in question relates to 242 of 2004. It is unfortunate that the case number as well as the copy annexed in the petition are both incorrect. Learned counsel for the other side submits that four witnesses have already deposed. This court has no reason to disbelieve the court, wherein it states that the police paper has already been supplied to the accused Vivekanand Singh. In this view of the matter, I do not find any merit in this revision application and the same is dismissed. Kundan (S. P. Singh, J.)