IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7744 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 14.12.2011 Mohan and another ...Petitioners Versus Arun Yadav and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) Challenge is to the order dated 25.11.2011 (Annexure P-3) whereby the learned Additional District Judge, Gurgaon has allowing the appeal filed by the plaintiffs/respondents and set aside the judgment and decree dated 19.05.2011 passed by the HCS, Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Gurgaon. The lower appellate Court has remanded the matter back to the trial Court to be restored to its original number for decision on merits after affording opportunities to plaintiffs and defendants to adduce their evidence in accordance with law. The grievance of the petitioners is that the plaintiffs/respondents have filed the suit in the year 2008. They did not submit any list of witnesses neither they deposited the diet money. They were granted six opportunities to lead their evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioners restricts his prayer that the trial Court be directed to conclude the trial within a reasonable time. This prayer is fair. The trial Court is directed to give four effective opportunities to the plaintiffs to conclude their evidence subject to payment of Rs. 5000/- to the defendants before leading the evidence. Three opportunities be also given to the defendants after closing the plaintiffs evidence. Thereafter trial Court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously. Accordingly, civil revision is disposed of. December 14, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) G.Arora JUDGE