IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17739 of 2010 DR.RAJ NARAYAN SINGH SON OF LATE BASUDEO SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MALKHA CHAK, POLICE STATION DIGHWARA, DISTRICT CHHAPRA (SARAN) AT PRESENT RESIDING AT SAPANA APARTMENT FLAT NO. 303B RAM NAGRI SECTOR – 3 ASHIANA ROAD, PATNA 25 Versus 1. THE V.C., RAJENDRA AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY PUSA DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. 2. THE REGISTRAR, RAJENDRA AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY, PUSA DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. 3. THE COMPTROLLER RAJENDRA AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY, PUSA, DISTRICT SAMASTIPUR. ----------- 02. 27.10.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the Office Order no. 398 dated 30th of August 2010 as contained in Annexure- 11. It is submitted that from the order, it appears that the amount of Rs. 3,35,385/- on account of interest which has been paid over the different items as indicated in the order is being shown as recoverable from him. It is further submitted that the amount shown is final recoverable amount, however, the necessary order would be issued by the University under the orders of the Vice Chancellor/Registrar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the amount indicated is not correct for the reason 2 that the interest whatever has been paid against the head mentioned in the impugned order is under the orders of this court passed in C.W.J.C. No. 12826 of 2004 which was disposed of alongwith C.W.J.C. No. 12398 of 2004 as per order dated 11.10.2004 vide Annexure- 6. It is further submitted that the interest were rightly paid by the University as stated in Paragraph – 3 of the show cause filed in M.J.C. No. 1425 of 2005 as contained in Annexure- 7. However, in order to clarify the issue, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against the alleged amount of interest said to have been paid in excess petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 2 with a copy to respondent no. 3. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall dispose of the representation by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. Till the disposal of the representation of the petitioner, the office order no. 398 dated 30th of August 2010 as contained in Annexure- 11 shall be kept in 3 abeyance. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)