IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-28876 of 2009 Date of decision:23.12.2009. Jagtar Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. P.S.Mann, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Mr. K.D.S.Sandhu, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. In this plea for quashment based upon compounding, petitioner No.11 – Amritpal Singh S/o Anoop Singh had been directed to appear before the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ajnala to make a statement owning up the compounding. The report furnished by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ajnala is to the effect that he did appear and owned up the compounding. The joint statement of petitioner Nos.1 to 10, 12 to 14 and respondent No.2 owning up the compounding was recorded by this Court on 23.11.2009. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.71 dated 20.06.2006, under Sections 307, 324, 326, 506, 323, 148, 149 IPC and 25, 27, 54, 59 of the Arms Act, P.S. Ajnala (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. December 23, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE