:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.227 OF 2007 PETITION NO.227 OF 2007 PETITION NO.227 OF 2007 Rakesh Chandanmal Mehta ..Petitioner Vs. The Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.H.R.Shetty for the Petitioner. Mr.Y.R.Mishra with Mr.Y.S.Bhate for the Respondents. Mr.K.R.Belosey, A.G.P. for Respondent No.4 CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 7TH MARCH, 2007 : 7TH MARCH, 2007 : 7TH MARCH, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. The learned Counsel for the Respondents waive service. By consent, taken up for hearing. 2. By this Petition, the Petitioner is challenging the Order-in-Original dated 1st September,2003 passed by the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade as well as the Order-in-Original dated 24th March,2005 passed by the Additional Director General of Foreign Trade. The main grievance of the Petitioner is that while passing both the above orders, the Petitioner could not produce the relevant original documents. :2: 3. The learned Counsel for the Respondents now fairly concedes that the Petitioner has now produced the relevant original documents. In view of the same, in the larger interest of justice, we quash and set aside both the orders dated 1st September,2003 as well as the order dated 24th March,2005 and remand back the matter to the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade to hear the Petitioner after affording a fair opportunity of personal hearing and consider the matter afresh in the light of the aforesaid original documents. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)