CWP No. 30/2011 06.04.2011 Present: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. R. M. Bisht, Dy. A. G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. for respondents No.1 to 3 Mr. Shyam Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.4 It is the petitioner’s case, as set out in para-2 of the petition that without allowing him to complete his normal tenure at his original place of posting at GSSS, Kashmela, District Mandi, vide order dated 9.7.2009 (Annexure P-2), he stands transferred to GSSS, Thalout, District Mandi, vide order dated December, 2010 (Annexure P-1). According to the oral submission made by the petitioner, post at GSSS, Thalout is also not lying vacant as of date. 2. Petition is highly misconceived. Petitioner was working as a PET vide order dated 9.7.2009. While he was under posting on promotion as a DPE to the school at Kufri, District Mandi, he got himself adjusted in the school at GSSS, Kashmela. However, one Sunil Kumar approached this Court by way of Civil Writ Petition No. 7520 of 2010. Importantly, Sunil Kumar also was a PTA and considering his grievance that he had been displaced not by a PTA, this Court vide order dated 1.12.2010 directed to consider accommodating Sunil Kumar in some post lying vacant. Accordingly, respondent No.2, after affording personal hearing to all concerned ordered the present petitioner, who is a DPE to be adjusted at GSSS, Thalout, District Mandi, where the vacancy exists. Sh. Sunil Kumar was allowed to rejoin and continue to work as a PTA teacher at GSSS, Kashmela. Petitioner had got himself adjusted at GSSS, Kashmela, where he was otherwise not entitled to be posted. Thalout also is in District Mandi, where petitioner can conveniently discharge his duties. Respondent No.4 submits that he is already working at GSSS, Kashmela. Adjustment of Sunil Kumar at GSSS, Kashmela was pursuant to the order of this Court. Consequently, action of the respondents cannot be faulted for any reason. No ground for interference is made out. There is no material on record to even pima facie show that petitioner’s transfer is as a result of arbitrariness. Consequently present petition is dismissed. Petitioner is directed to immediately join at the place of his posting. Interim order dated 5.1.2011 is vacated. April 06, 2011 ( Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.