IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND SIX : PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI. JUSTICE: B. PRAKASH RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI. JUSTICE: RAMESH RANGANATHAN CONTEMPT CASE No. 467 OF 2005 Between: T. Gangadhar S/o. Venkta Radha Ramana, Social Service, R/o. Santhapeta, Ongole, Prakasam District. ..Petitioner AND 1. State of A.P., rep. by Prl. Secretary K.V. Rao (previously), Industries & Commerce Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. P. Dayasankar, Director of Mines & Geology, B.R.K.R. Bhavan, Near Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 3. Smt. B. Udayalakshmi, I.A.S., District Collector, Prakasam District. 4. P. Pullaiah, Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Ongole, Prakasam District. 5. A. Prasad, Revenue Divisional Officer, Ongole, Prakasam District. 6. K. Bhaskara Rao, Mandal Revenue Officer (Previous), Chimakurthy (M), Prakasam District. 7. State of A.P., rep. by Principal Secretary, V.P. Jawahari, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. (8th respondent in WP is not necessary party in CC) ..Respondents Contempt Case filed under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act praying the High Court to punish the respondents herein for contempt of court for disobedience of the orders of this Hon’ble Court in W.P. No. 872 of 2004 dt. 11-03-2004; The Contempt Case coming on for hearing upon perusing the Case and the affidavit filed herein and the order of the High Court dated: 11-07-2005, 29-08-2005, 08-08-2005, 28-11-2005, 12-12-2005 and 06-03-2006 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri C. Ramachandra Raju, Advocate for the petitioner and of the G.P. for Industries and Commerce and the Advocate General on behalf of the Respondents, the Court made the following ORDER: “Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Industries and Commerce. The Advocate Commissioner is also present. Having regard to the report submitted pointing out that certain persons, who stated to be quarrying, it is not desirable that appropriate steps had to be taken with regard to all such persons, and further as the petitioner states that he had not given any notice at the time of inspection, it may warrant further reinspection. For enabling the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader to furnish particulars of all the existing lesser or such other persons, who even is stated to be quarrying. Post on 17-07-2006”. DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER ..2.. To 1. K.V. Rao (Previously), Principal Secretary, State of A.P., Industries & Commerce Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. P. Dayasankar, Director of Mines & Geology, B.R.K.R. Bhavan, Near Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 3. Smt. B. Udayalakshmi, I.A.S., District Collector, Prakasam District. 4. P. Pullaiah, Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Ongole, Prakasam District. 5. A. Prasad, Revenue Divisional Officer, Ongole, Prakasam District. 6. K. Bhaskara Rao, Mandal Revenue Officer (Previous), Chimakurthy (M), Prakasam District. (ADDRESSEES 3 TO 6 BY RPAD) 7. V.P. Jawahari, Principal Secretary, State of A.P., Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. (Addressees to 1, 2 & 7 BY SPECIAL MESSENGER) 8. Two CCs to the Advocate General, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT) 9. Two CCs to the G.P. for Industries and Commerce, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 10. Sri C. Ramachandra Raju, Advocate, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 11. Two spare copies. Ksv HIGH COURT Ksv Date of drafting: 10-07-2006 BPRJ & RRJ DATE: 06-07-2006 NOTE: POST ON 17-07-2006 ORDER C.C. NO. 467 OF 2005 DIRECTION