IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26181 of 2011 Durga Paswan, son of late Anup Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 09.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 341, 324, 307 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner kept absconding for a number of years on account of which the case could not be committed to the court of Sessions, I am not inclined to grant him bail at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the Trial Court shall release the petitioner on bail “after framing of charge”, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 140A of 1992 arising out of Kanti P.S. Case No. 237 of 1982 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any 2 change in the address of the petitioner (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The fact that there is only one other case pending against the petitioner shall be verified by the Trial Court before releasing the petitioner on bail. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)