IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8518 of 2003 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.07.2011 Chandan Sapra ... Petitioner Versus Haryana Financial Corporation and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: Mr. C.B. Goyal, Advocate and Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate for Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Advocate for the respondent. Ms. Kriti Singh, DAG, Haryana. ***** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? NO 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? NO K. KANNAN, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present petition be dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Allowed as prayed for. Dismissed as infructuous. JULY 05, 2011 ( K. KANNAN ) Rajan JUDGE