IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 512 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 01/04/2009 in WP NO : 6819 OF 2009 on the file of the High Court) Between: D. Ramanujulu, S/o D.Siva Ramulu, R/o. H.No.1-8-195, NIRD Road, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy district. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy district, Spoorthy Bhavan, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, O/o. Attapur, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Tahsildar, Rajendranagar Mandal, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District. 4 K.Ashok Kumar, S/o. Late K.Anjaiah, R/o. Flat No.213, Kamshetty Enclaves, Yamuna Block, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad-13 5 Dr. K.Rajitha, W/o. K.Ashok Kumar, R/o. Flat No.213, Kamshetty Enclaves, Yamuna Block, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad-13 .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR.K.V.SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE The Division Bench of this Judgment follows Court made the following : 2nd page THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 512 of 2009 JUDGMENT : (Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) The writ appeal is filed against the order dated 01-4-2009 passed in WP.No.6819 of 2009 by the learned single Judge whereby the learned single Judge dismissed the said writ petition holding that as long as the petitioner does not make any claim, vis-à-vis the land, over which respondents 4 and 5 are said to be making constructions, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. 2. The writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus to declare the action of Respondents 1 to 3 in not initiating action against the Respondents 4 and 5 by taking steps to stop the illegal constructions in survey No. 91 situated at Kokapet village and Gram Panchayat, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy district abutting his property and obstructing his compound wall as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently to direct the Respondents 1 to 3 to take immediate steps to stop the illegal constructions that are being carried out by the Respondents 4 and 5. 3. It is stated that the petitioner is said to be in possession and enjoyment of Ac:0-38 guntas of land in survey No.84 (part) situated at Kokapet village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy district. The grievance of the petitioner is that Respondents 4 and 5 are constructing a compound wall, over the Government land in survey No.91 of that village. The said construction would block the access of the petitioner to his land and that though respondents 1 to 3 were approached in this regard, no action has been taken. 4. Under the above circumstances, when the matter came up for hearing, on instructions, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the compound wall which was constructed over the Government land in survey No.91 of Kokapet village is classified as poramboke and as such the construction of a compound wall by the respondents 4 and 5 is illegal and the respondents 1 to 3 have taken immediate steps and demolished the same on 23-4-2009. 5. Recording the submissions made by the learned Government Pleader, the writ appeal is closed. No costs. _________________________ JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI. ______________________________ JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZUL PURKAR. 27-04-2009. I s L