AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.980 OF 2009 Suresh Adsul ... Petitioner Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. C.K. Tripathi for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & R.G. KETKAR, JJ. DATED : 26TH JUNE, 2009. P.C.:- The petitioner has addressed a complaint to the Municipal Commissioner of Greater Bombay making grievance against respondent 3, who is an employee of the Bombay Municipal Corporation. He is stated to be Sub-Engineer, “G” North Ward. The complaint is addressed to the Municipal Commissioner, Greater AJN 2 Bombay and a copy thereof is addressed to the Chief Justice of India, the Chief Justice of Bombay High Court, National Commission for SC/ST, Chief Minister of State of Maharashtra, State Commission for SC/ST, National Handicap Commission, New Delhi, Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, etc. A grievance is made in our court that the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai ought to have considered the representation and sent a reply to the petitioner. 2. We have already mentioned that the complaint is not addressed to the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai. Copy is forwarded to him for information. In such circumstances, we cannot issue any direction to the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai to pass any order on the complaint. It will be open to the petitioner if he so desires to file a private complaint or to address a representation/complaint to the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai. We, however, make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and any observation made in this order shall not be interpreted to AJN 3 mean that we have expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. If any representation/complaint is made to the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, he may look into it independently and in accordance with law. The petition is disposed of. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [R.G. KETKAR, J.]