IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 17673 of 2005 Between: Vanapalli Sri Veera Venkata Naga Ravi Raju S/o. Naga Prasad, Hindu, R/o. 3-33, Drivers Colony, Indrapalem, Kakinada-533 006, ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Kakinada, E.G. District, 2 Station House Officer, Indrapalem Police Station, Kakinada, E.G. District, .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring action of respondents in determining petitioner at their respective police stations without mentioning any complaint lodged against him as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14 & 21 of Constitution of India and consequently restrain respondents from interfering with life & liberty of petitioner in the absence of any complaint against petitioner and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.N.VIJAY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents. 2. Petitioner questions the action of the respondents in detaining him in the police station without there being any complaint against him. 3. Counter has been filed stating that the petitioner had a love affair with one girl by name E.Madhavi and as he refused to marry her the said Madhavi filed a petition before the District Collector, East Godavari District and the said petition was forwarded to the Superintendent of Police for taking necessary action but no criminal case has been registered on the said complaint and the petitioner was never made to sit in the police station as alleged in the writ affidavit. It is stated that no action has been initiated against the petitioner on the said petition filed by the said Madhavi. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, and in view of the aforesaid categorical denial of all the allegations made in the writ affidavit, no orders need be passed in this Writ Petition. 5. Accordingly, Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J 13th March, 2008 Tsy To 1 The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Kakinada, E.G. District, 2 The Station House Officer, Indrapalem Police Station, Kakinada, E.G. District,