FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders WRIT PETITION NO.6950/2007 1. We heard learned counsel Mr. S.S. Thombare for petitioner and Mr. K.S. Patil learned AGP for respondent sole. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Counsel appearing for the respective parties waive rule notice. By consent of the parties, heard finally. 3. Petitioner approached to this Court with following prayers. A. This writ petition may kindly be allowed. B. By issuing writ of mandamus or any other writ or directions in the like nature, direct the respondent to decide the claim of the petitioner towards the Karkhana and to pay the amount of Rs. 52,90,38/- with interest to the petitioner as early as possible. C. Pending, hearing and final disposal of this writ petition, direct the Collector to pay the amount of Rs.52,90,538/- with interest to the petitioner. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders D. Any other appropriate relief to which the petitioner is entitled to, may please be granted in favour of the petitioner. 4. Petitioner's main prayer seems to be incorporated in prayer clause B. This petition was before this Court on 5.12.2007. Matter was adjourned at the instance of learned AGP for taking instructions. Ultimately, on behalf of respondent affidavit-in-reply is filed. It has been affirmed by one Mr. Madhav Balajirao Nilawad, Tahsildar, Aurangabad. In paragraph No.6, statement is made that writ petition No.5687/2004 is pending before this Court that is reason why the respondent is unable to settle the claim of the present petitioner. However, important statement is made that after disposal of writ petition No.5687/2004, grievance/claim of the present petition will be settled as per the priorities. We accept this statement made on oath by the respondent. 5. In the result, writ petition is partly allowed and disposed of in view of the statement made in FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders paragraph No.6 of the affidavit-in-reply. Rule made absolute in above terms. No order as to costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.) (S.B.DESHMUKH, J.) --- Dt : 30.08.2010 aaa/6950.07