IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6880 of 2009 SHIV JANKI DEVI @ JANKI DEVI W/o Late Ram Sakal Singh, resident of Mohalla-Village- Sarai, P.S. Sakara, District Muzaffarpur. ---Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Higher Education, Bihar, Patna. 3. B.R.A. Bihar University, through its Registrar, Muzaffarpur. 4. The Vice-Chancellor, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. 5. The Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. ----------- 2. 23.6.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as well as the University. The grievance of the petitioner is for correction in the date of superannuation of her husband who retired on 31st of July, 2000. However, pensionary benefits are being calculated taking into consideration the date of retirement as 31st of January, 2000. Further prayer is that the petitioner is entitled to re-fixation of the monthly pension in the revised scale in terms of the notification dated 11th of August, 2007, as contained in Annexure 2. Learned counsel submits that despite representing the matter before the Vice-Chancellor of the University (respondent no.4), the grievances of the petitioner has remained unconsidered till date. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.4. Considering the submissions of the petitioner, she is permitted to file a fresh detailed representation before respondent no.4 2 within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order. In case such a representation is filed, the respondent no.4 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner as raised in her representation and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. Upon consideration, if the representation is disposed of in favour of the petitioner, respondent no.4 shall simultaneously issue necessary orders with regard to the claims of the petitioner so that the grievances as raised in her representation could be redressed without further delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)