dik WP 7835.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7835 OF 2011 Mr. Rajendra Dagadu Ingale ...Petitioner vs Chandrakant Dinkar Jadhav, Sarpancha, ... Respondents Grampanchayat Kshetra Mauli, Dist. Satara & ors. Mr.A.Y.Sakhare, Mr. Siddharth Karpe for the petitioner. Ms.Prabhaja Gujar for Resondent No. 4 Mr.R.M.Patne A.G.P. For Resodnent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM: GIRISH S.GODBOLE, J DATED: 14th December,2011 P.C. Heard Mr. Sakhare, learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner, learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1,2 and Mr. P.B. Gujar for the respondent No.4. 2. It is undisputed that the respondent No.4 has resigned from the post of Sarpanch. In view of this, there is no question of removing respondent No.4 from the post of Sarpanch. 3. If it is the contention of the petitioner that the finding of the State Government regarding validly passing of the dik WP 7835.2011 resolution is wrong. The petitioner can raise such contentions in appropriate proceedings which he may adopt in accordance with law. If such contention is raised, the contention of the respondent No.4 that the resolution was validly passed, shall also be kept open. Similarly the contention of the respondent No.4 that the finding given by the State Government is proper shall also be kept open. In short, the rival contentions of the parties in respect of the disputed resolution are kept open to be agitated in appropriate proceedings. 4. Subject to the aforesaid clarification, this Writ Petition is not entertained and disposed off only on the count that respondent No.4 has resigned from the post of Sarpanch. GIRISH S. GODBOLE, J.