mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10020 OF 2009 Mrs.Neelam Bhatia and others Petitioners versus Vinod S. Bhatia and others Respondents Mr.Prashant Malik i/by D.V.Deokar for petitioners. Ms.Sheela Mistryi/by J.R.Patel for respondent no.3. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 18th January 2010 PC :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners who are the original plaintiffs. By the impugned order, the plaint filed by the petitioners has been rejected as against third and fourth respondents. 2. In view of sub section 2 of section 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, an order rejecting a plaint is a decree. Therefore, remedy of preferring an appeal under section 96 of the said Code is available. Only on this ground, the writ petition is not entertained and the same is rejected by keeping the remedy of appeal open. All contentions of the parties are kept open. (A.S.OKA, J.)