HI§H CGURT GF CHMATTEES$A§H $1L§5?U:R Cr'im'amé Fv§§sc. ?a1’3“§'§cn N$.§i3 a“? 3&1 ?EHTIONER2 Qopd‘ 3aidu, 3x’0 Makkan Led Sdrm, f‘a/‘fw 2%3 Magisfmfz, Raipur, Tahsii and Disfric‘r Raipur‘ (CG) {‘E’ei‘ifion undar Sac‘h‘on 482 of Tha Criminai Procedure Code 19?3} Pre$errh Mr. Anumeh Shrivas‘mva, counsei for The pe'ri?i0r1er. :‘W. SumH' J'hwwar', Panel Lawyer for The Sfafe/responde'nt. Sinale Bensh: Han’bie Mr. T‘P. sharma J OW”. O§D§R (18-2—2011) . By This pe‘HTion under‘ SecTion 482 of The (CrPC, The peTiTioner hag chaHenged TagaT'iTy & proprieTy of The'order doTed mum-203.9 pasged by The 2” AddiTiom! Sessions Judge, §aloda Bazaar‘.in Criminal Revision No.4l/2009, affirming Tha order doTod 39-4-2009 po§sed by T‘nz Juciiciai MagisTmTe Fir$T Ciasg, Baioda Bazaar, in Criminal Case No.543/2010. 2. married counsei for T'ae paTiTioner‘ saaks To wiThdmw This pzTiTiors wiTh iiberTy To raise Tfae grounds made in This peTiTion, before The Triai CourT‘ The peTiTion is dismissed as wi’ri'icirawn wiTh iiberTy a'foreooid. 4. Consequen‘iiy, LANosl & 2 sTrmd disposed’oii/I,/ X Sdl- QJ /’ Soma Ty. Sham” Judge years We Near i’he 5:212 of Maw” Mandm Balcdabazar, Dis‘rricf §nipur (CG) Verscs RES?ONDENT: Smfe of Chha‘r‘risgarh Through DisTric‘f