1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.989 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.3081 OF 1988 The Khatau Makanji Spg. & Wvg. Company Ltd. ..Plaintiff. Vs. The Khatau Makanji & Co. Pvt. Ltd. ..Defendant. ... Ms. Geetanjali Prabhu i/b Vigil Juris for the Plaintiff. Mr. Jayesh Vyas i/b Bilawala & Co. for Defendant in support of the Chamber Summons. .... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 30th November, 2006. P.C. : The Chamber Summons has been taken out for amendment of the written statement. There is no reply to the Chamber Summons. There is no reason why the Chamber Summons should not be allowed particularly having regard to the fact that by an order dated 5th July, 2006, the Division Bench in appeal had allowed the application for taking the written statement on the record, subject to the payment of costs which have been deposited. The Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of 2 prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks. Suit to be placed on Board after two weeks for framing issues. Parties to exchange draft issues in the meantime.