HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI5§ARH AT BILAsPUR Criminai Appea‘ No$66 cf ZGGI Puspa Singh Wife of Vikmma 5ingh aged abouf 35 years, Occupa‘rion Nurse, residem‘ 67’ Karmam‘oia, R5Navada, DIS‘H. Am; Bihnr. Appenam Versus esandzm 5mm of Chhm-Tisgarh, Through Palice S’m‘rion Kurud‘ Disf‘rRaipur. (CRIMINAL APPEAL UNDER SEC‘IION 374(2) Cr.P.C.) ($3: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. 5ham. J‘} Presant= Mr. MKBhaduri, counsel for the appeliant Mr. Snmeer Behqr, Panel lawyer for fhe Sfafe‘ ORAL ORDER (Passed on 26‘“ Navember. 2008) This ravision 951mm: is dimmed agairs? we judgmen‘t of cvnvic‘rinn and arder of senfenc'e dated 10.5.2001 passed by *‘he $pecial Judge, Rqipur, in 5peciui Criminai Case No.74f99. Learned counsel for Th2 appeiiont submi‘i’s i’hm' Criminal Appeal o.é29,/2001 has aiso been preferred against The. some judgmanf on behaif of Rambabu Kahor, $umi+m Davi Kahar and fhe presan’f appeilmf prior To 1 filing of This append. Learned counsei seeks permission of mis Cour‘t to withdraw ‘rhis appeal wifh a; iiber‘iy Tha'r he will permi'i’ To argua in Criminn! Appeal No.é29/2001 on behalf of Pushpa Singh. Being a second appeal, This appeal is dismissed as unnecessary. p Shri M.K.Blmdur, counsel is permitted m argue in Criminal Appeal No.629/2001 on behalf of Pushpa 5ingh. s ..__ 2.-.. @ R N