IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.6089 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.9.2010 Jasbir Singh ....Petitioner Versus Beant Arora and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Daygeesh Kumar Bhatti, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. There is no legal infirmity in the impugned order as the discretion vested in the court while answering the application under order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC has been correctly exercised by observing that any alienation made during the pendency of the suit will be subject to the principle of lis pendens and at this moment when the petitioner disputes the dimensions of the property as given in the general power of attorney are yet to be decided on the basis of evidence. Thus there is no scope of interference in the revisional jurisdiction unless some gross perversity has been shown. Consequently, the revision petition being without any merit is dismissed. 21.9.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss