1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 2875/2007 (Ravi Manik Jadhav & others VERSUS The State of Mah. & others ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Kurekar, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Deshpande, counsel for the R-3 and 4. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 15, 2008. Heard. The counsel for the petitioner states that in the present petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to respondent to appoint petitioner on the post of Health Worker (Male), Zilla Parishad, Washim. The counsel for the Zilla Parishad states that in the year 2003, recruitment rules are framed for this purpose, and therefore, the Zilla Parishad is required to follow the procedure stipulated in the Recruitment Rules of the year 2003 while effecting recruitment. 2 The counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that there are recruitment rules framed in the year 2003. In that view of the matter, the direction sought by the petitioner is not possible for us to grant. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE APTE