1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2829 OF 2009 Smt.Saraswtibai W/o. Narayan Newase .. Petitioner Versus Chinchwad Devasthan Trust .. Respondent Mr.A.B.Tajane for petitioner CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 23rd April 2009. P.C. . Mr.Tajne after taking instructions fairly states that the impugned order is appealable and, therefore, the petitioner would take steps to prefer an appeal to challenge the same. However, since, the executing Court has dismissed the objections to the execution and enforcement of the decree and that the petitioner applicant has been dispossessed therefrom, no question arises of passing any order to protect his possession. 2 As far as the apprehension that the Trust may change the nature of the property, I am of the opinion that the petitioner can seek appropriate orders and reliefs from the appellate Court. More so, when I have held that the petitioner has an alternate efficacious remedy and the petition is not maintainable. Petition dismissed accordingly. No costs. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)