HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION.NO.2933 OF 2011 O R D E R: The petitioner submits that he is neither a party to the Civil Suit OS.No.91 of 2011 nor a party to IA.No.60 of 2011 moved therein for injunction. Entertaining IA.No.60 of 2011, the Court has passed an injunction order restraining the defendants/respondents in the IA from cutting away the Eucalyptus trees standing in land of extent of Ac.10.00 situate in Sy.No.108 and 109 of Maddikonda Village of Aswaraopeta Mandal, Khammam District. The particulars of the said land of Ac.10.00 were also specified therein. 2. When it was noticed that the petitioner herein is trying to cut away the Eucalyptus trees, IA.No.89 of 2011 has been moved therein and the Station House Officer, Aswaraopeta is directed to take immediate action against the petitioner herein and his other supporters, who are said to be trying to cut away Eucalyptus trees from the suit schedule properties against the orders. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed earlier in IA.No.60 of 2011 dated 20.06.2011 will not bind the petitioner, as he is not a party. There cannot be any quarrel with regard to the proposition of law. Any order of injunction granted by a competent Civil Court will not bind a person who is not a party thereto, but, on the ground that he is not a party to the proceedings, the petitioner without having any right, cannot interfere with the right of the respondent to possess the land of Ac.10.00 in Sy.No.108 and 109 of Maddikonda Village of Aswaraopeta Mandal. To preserve the standing crop on the suit schedule land, the present order is passed. If the writ petitioner has got any right of manner to the property/standing crop on the said land, he has to seek impleadment in the suit and ask for modification of the orders passed by the Court earlier. Without doing so, he cannot interfere with the possession of the land of the plaintiff nor can he seek to cut away the Eucalyptus trees standing on the land of extent of Ac.10.00 situate in Maddikonda Village of Aswaraopeta Mandal, Khammam District. 4. It is needless for me to say that in case the petitioner claims title, interest or possession of the very same land comprising the suit schedule property, it is for him to seek modification of the earlier order of injunction granted by the Court. Without doing so, he shall not seek to interfere. 5. With this observation, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed. No costs. ___________________________ Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao July 26, 2011 SP HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION.NO.2933 OF 2011 July 26, 2011 SP