HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL (Court’s order whether the case is or not approved for reporting.) (Chapter VIII Rule 32 (2) (b) Description of the case. Writ Petition No. 940 (S/S) 2007 Smt. Pushpa Aswal …..Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand And 2 others. ….Respondents (And 44 other connected petitions) Approved for reporting __________________ Not approved for reporting. Date of Decision 11th October, 2007. Initial of Judge. ________________ ________________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL. (1) Writ Petition No. 940(S/S)2007 Smt. Pushpa Aswal W/o Sri Pooran Singh Aswal, Headmistress, Primary School, Gupt Kashi, Block Ukhimath, District Rudraprayag. ----Petitioner. Vs. 1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary Education, Govt. of Uttarakhand, Dehradun, 2. Director of School Education, Uttarakhand, Dehradun, 3. District Education Officer, Rudraprayag, District Rudraprayag. ---Respondents With (2) WPSS 937 (S/S)07 Revti Rawat vs. State and two others. With (3) WPSS 986 (S/S)07 Narmada Bamola vs. Add. Distt. Education Officer & three others. With (4) WPSS 996 (S/S)07 Bharti Chaudhary vs. State and two others. With (5) WPSS 1023 (S/S)07 Vinod Kumari Bisht vs. State and two others. With (6) WPSS 1031 (S/S)07 Shobha Arya vs. State and two others. With (7) WPSS 1032 (S/S)07 Mohan Singh vs. State and two others. With (8) WPSS 1045 (S/S)07 Uma Bisht vs. State and three others. With (9) WPSS 1072 (S/S)07 Kusum Ghansiyal vs. Add. District Education officer. With (10) WPSS 1076 (S/S)07 Leela Vaishnav vs. State and three others. With (11) WPSS 1078 (S/S)07 Darmiyan Singh Jethudi vs. State and two others. With (12) WPSS 1081 (S/S)07 Shakuntala Negi and four ors. vs. State and three others. With (13) WPSS 1086 (S/S)07 Pushpalata Bhaskar vs. State and two others. With (14) WPSS 1088 (S/S)07 Kusumlata Panwar vs. State and three others. With (15) WPSS 1091 (S/S)07 Girish Chandra Khati vs. State and two others. With (16) WPSS 1093 (S/S)07 Shashi Negi vs. State and three others. With (17) WPSS 1095 (S/S)07 Manveer Singh Chauhan and two ors. vs. State & two others. With (18) WPSS 1097 (S/S)07 Mamta Pandey vs. State and three others. With (19) WPSS 1109 (S/S)07 Amita Kweera vs. State and three others. With (20) WPSS 1110 (S/S)07 Sunita Bhandari vs. State and three others. With (21) WPSS 1111 (S/S)07 Nirmala Godiyal vs. State and three others. With (22) WPSS 1115 (S/S)07 Madhulika Thapliyal vs. State and three others. With (23) WPSS 1116 (S/S)07 Gayatri Rana vs. State and three others. With (24) WPSS 1118 (S/S)07 Sumitra Dabral vs. State and two others. With (25) WPSS 1125 (S/S)07 Balwant Singh vs. State and two others. With (26) WPSS 1126 (S/S)07 Urmila Devi vs. State and four others. With (27) WPSS 1138 (S/S)07 Sakuntala Kandwal vs. State and three others. With (28) WPSS 1139 (S/S)07 Suresh Chandra vs. State and three others. With (29) WPSS 1145 (S/S)07 Rampyari Chauhan vs. State and three others. With (30) WPSS 1146 (S/S)07 Vimla Gupta vs. State and three others. With (31) WPSS 1154 (S/S)07 Shashi Prabha and another vs. State and two others. With (32) WPSS 1157 (S/S)07 Bharti Kholia & five ors. vs. State and three others. With (33) WPSS 1161 (S/S)07 Bhuwan Chandra Kafaltiya & two ors. vs. State & three others. With (34) WPSS 1163 (S/S)07 Nirmala Nainwal vs. State and three others. With (35) WPSS 1170 (S/S)07 Hamanti Ghildiyal vs. State and two others. With (36) WPSS 1194 (S/S)07 Meera Kukreti vs. State and two others. With (37) WPSS 1200 (S/S)07 Veena Sharma vs. State and two others. With (38) WPSS 1201 (S/S)07 Deepa Arya vs.District Education Officer & another. With (39) WPSS 1213 (S/S)07 Anandi Arya vs. District Education Officer & another. With (40) WPSS 1215 (S/S)07 Jaishila Chauhan and another vs. State & two others. With (41) WPSS 1221 (S/S)07 Kusumlata Sharma vs. State & two others. With (42) WPSS 1244 (S/S)07 Gopal Dutt Bhatt vs. State and three others. With (43) WPSS 1272 (S/S)07 Kailash Chandra Joshi vs. State and three others. With (44) WPSS 1262 (S/S)07 Shobha Dalakoti vs. State and three others. With (45) WPSS 1288 (S/S)07 Vineeta Shuyal vs. State and two others. Sarva Sri S.K. Posti Adv., Rajendra Dobhal, Adv., Manoj Tewari, Adv., Pankaj Purohit, Adv., V.B.S. Negi, Adv., B.S. Adhikari, Adv., D.S. Patni, Adv., M.S. Chauhan, Adv., Arun Mohan Saklani, Adv., B.S. Negi, Adv., Dinesh Chauhan, Adv., Subhash Upadhyay, Adv., Ravi Babulkar, Adv., Anil Bisht, Adv., Vikas Pandey, Adv., N.S. Pundir, Adv., C.S. Rawat, Adv., M.S. Bisht, Adv., Ashish Rawat, Adv., Pradeep Hairiya, Adv., N.S. Rautela, Adv., Prabhakar Joshi, Adv., N.K. Khandelwa, Adv., K.C. Tewari, Adv., Prem S. Uniyal, learned counsel for the petitioners. AND. Sri H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondents. Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondents. In all the above writ petitions, the petitioners who are working as Headmaster/Headmistress in the Primary schools have been transferred by the respondents on different dates. The ground transferring the petitioners is common that since the particular petitioner had joined his/her present place of posting in the Institution at the last therefore; he/she is being transferred being an excess teacher. Aggrieved with the transfer orders, the petitioners have approached this Court. Since common question of law is involved which is to be determined by this Court in all these writ petitions, therefore for the sake of convenience all the above petitions have been consolidated and are being decided by a common judgment. Writ petition no. 940(ss) of 2007 Smt. Pushpa Aswal vs. State and others shall be treated as the leading case. Brief facts, which emerge out from all the petitions, are identical except the fact that one petitioner is transferred from place-‘A’ to place-‘B’ and other has been transferred from place-‘C’ to place ‘D’. The respondents have filed counter affidavit in writ petition no. 940 (ss)2007 Smt. Pushpa Aswal vs. State and others to which the petitioner Smt. Pushpa Aswal has filed rejoinder affidavit in the aforesaid writ petition. The respondents have submitted that the counter affidavit filed in the said writ petition may be read in all other writ petitions. The law of transfer has been will settled by the Courts in a catena of decisions. A person holding a transferable post, cannot claim a vested right to work at a particular place as the transfer order does not affect any of his/her legal rights and Court should not interfere with the transfer order passed in public interest of administrative exigency. Transfer or posting are ordinary incidents of service and ordinarily any transfer or posting is presumed to have been made to satisfy the administrative exigency of service. No consent is required from the employee before transferring him. Even if the transfer order has been passed taking into consideration the complaints against an employee or has been passed on the directions of Minister of the Department concerned on being receiving complaint from public should not be interfered as the same would avoid any future trouble or incident which may take place. Since the transfer being incident of service, for providing power to transfer no specific provision is required. Even if the transfer order has been passed in violation of Guidelines framed by the Govt., the remedy before the employee is first to join at the new place of posting and then to make representation to the Authority concerned. It is true that the Guidelines framed by the Govt. for transfer of employee does not have statutory force, but at the same time, it is expected from the Govt. to follow the Guidelines which has been framed by the Govt. itself, otherwise there is no meaning to frame Guidelines, if the same are not to be followed. Again, though the Court should not ordinarily interfere with the transfer orders except on the ground that the transfer orders has been passed mala-fide, stigmatic in nature and is a frequent transfer, the Court may interfere even if the Guidelines on the basis of which the transfer has been made is absolutely arbitrary, the Court cannot sit silently and can interfere in the circumstances. Various questions have been raised by the petitioners during the course of arguments. Firstly; that the petitioners though have joined the Institutions at the last, but they should not have been transferred on the ground that by his/her joining to the Institution, the strength of teachers in the Institution has become in excess, specially when the teachers working in the School have a long stay and the Headmaster has joined only few months back. Secondly, in none of the impugned orders in the writ petitions it is mentioned that the employee is being transferred, instead of the word “Transfer”, the word ‘SAMAYOJAN’ has been used. Thirdly, in some of the impugned orders while adjusting the person to some other Institution, it is specifically stated by the transferring authority that the person concerned will not be entitled to get TA/DA. Learned Standing Counsel for State Sri H.M. Raturi has submitted that pursuant to the Govt. order dated 28.05.2007 issued in continuation of Govt. order dated 12.12.2005, the strength of teachers in proportion to number of students in Junior Basic Schools and Senior Basic Schools has been fixed. By the Govt. Order dated 12.12.2005 and 13.07.2007, the authorities have been directed to transfer such teachers who have joined in the Institution and by joining his/her in the Institution the strength of teachers, which is prescribed, has become in excess. He has further submitted that in the Basic Education, the district-wise details of number of Schools, number of students, sanctioned posts of Headmaster/ Headmistress and Assistant Teachers has been prepared, which shows that the sanctioned posts of Headmasters is less than the number of Schools with the result there are many Junior Basic Schools as well as Senior Basic Schools, being run without Headmasters/Headmistress and in those Schools, the senior teacher is holding the charge of Headmaster. The respondents have annexed a chart. In the chart, it is indicated that in the District Pauri, there are 1673 Schools against which only 1568 posts of Headmasters/Headmistresses are created. In District Chamoli 507 posts of Headmasters/Headmistresses are created against 973 Schools. Similar is the condition in respect of all other Districts. The total number of Junior Basic Schools and Senior Basic Schools, as the per the chart, is 12112; whereas only 8796 posts of Headmasters/ Headmistresses have been created by the State Govt. Contention of learned Standing Counsel is that the impugned transfer orders have been passed by the respondents transferring the Headmasters/ Headmistresses from one Institution where the sanctioned strength of Teachers has become in excess due to joining of that Headmaster by directing to join in a School where there is no Headmaster or Headmistress and those transfer orders impugned in these writ petitions are prefect, just and proper which are not in violation of any Rule. Further, the intention of direction issued by the Director of Schools to all the District Education Officers was to maintain uniformity and availability of Teachers in those Schools where there is lack of Teachers and this decision was taken in the interest of education and further in exigency of the service, the transfer order cannot be challenged. Prior to enforcement of Uttaranchal Education Act, 2006 (Act no. 8 of 2006 which came into force on 22nd April 2006), the services of Primary School Teachers were being governed by U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules 1981. The Rules were framed under Sub Section 1 of Section 19 of Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Act 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act no. 34 of 1972). Rule-5 of 1981 Rules aforesaid provides for source of recruitment for Assistant Teachers/Headmasters of Junior Basic School as also of Senior Basic School. Rule 21 of the aforesaid Rule provides procedure for transfer which reads as under:- 21. Procedure for Transfer:- There shall be no transfer of any teacher from rural local area to an urban local area or vice versa or from one urban local area to another of the same district or from local area of one district to that of another district except on the request of or with the consent of the teacher himself and in either case approval of the Board shall be necessary. Basic School/Junior Basic School/Senior Basic School/Local Area/Urban Local Area and Teacher has been defined under Rule-2 of the aforesaid Rules. Rule 2(1)c defines Basic School. Rule 2(1)h and Rule 2(1)m define Junior Basic School and Senior Basic School. Rule 2(1)c, 2(1)h and Rule 2(1)m are reproduced hereunder:- Rule2(1)c:- ‘Basic School’ means a school where instruction from Class I to VIII are imparted. Rule2(1)h:- ‘Junior Basic School’ means a Basic School where instructions from Class I to V are imparted. Rule2(1)m:- :- ‘Senior Basic School’ means a Basic School where instructions from Class VI to VIII are imparted. Under Rule-3, these Rules shall apply to:- (i) all teachers of Local Bodies transferred to the Board u/s 9 of the Act; and (ii) all teachers employed for the Basic and Nursery Schools established by the Board. On bifurcation of State of Uttarakhand from State of U.P., the Act and the Rules applicable in the State of Uttar Pradesh were adopted by the State of Uttarakhand and the services of these teachers were governed by these Rules of 1981, which were framed under Act no. 34 of 1972. The State of Uttarakhand passed Act no. 8 of 2006, which came into force on 22.04.2006. Section 60 of the Uttaranchal School Education Act 2006 relates to Repeal and Saving which is reproduced hereunder:- (1). The Uttaranchal (The Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921) Adaptation and Modification Order, 2002, The Uttaranchal (The Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Act, 1972) Adaptation and Modification Order, 2002, The Uttar Pradesh High Schools and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and Other Employees) Act, 1971 and the Uttar Pradesh Junior High School (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and Other Employees) Act, 1978 are hereby repealed. (2). Notwithstanding such repeal, anything done or any action taken under the Principal Acts referred to in sub-section (1) shall be deemed to have been done or taken under the corresponding provisions of the Act as if the provisions of the Act were in force at all material times. Thus, after enforcement of the Act no. 8 of 2006, Act of 1972 and Rules framed therein in 1981 are not applicable now in the case of teachers employed in Basic Schools i.e. in Junior Basic Schools and Senior Basic Schools. Under Section 58 of Act no. 8 of 2006, provision has been made for the teachers of these schools which provides that all the teachers, officers and employees of Basic Shiksha Parishad, including any supervising or inspecting officer or employee working immediately before the date of the commencement of this Act, shall be transferred to the State Government and they shall become teachers, officers and employees of the State Government and their services shall be governed by the service rules prescribed by the State Government. Learned counsel for the petitioners Sri S.K. Posti has submitted that though Rules have been framed under the Act, however the same are not approved, thus no Rules or Regulations under the Act are in force at present. Under Section 56 of Act no. 8 of 2006, the State Govt. has been empowered to issue Notification in the Gazette and to remove the difficulty by making such incidental or consequential provisions, not affecting the substance. Provided that no order shall be made after the expiration of the period of two years from the date of commencement of this Act. Provided further that such every order as soon as shall be laid, before the State Legislative Assembly. Learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that, though the Rules have been framed u/s 56 of the Act no. 8 of 2006, but the Rules have yet not been approved nor any Notification if issued to remove the difficulty has been laid before the State Legislative Assembly as required u/s 58 of the Act. For the purposes of deciding the issues involved, following Govt. Orders/Circular are relevant:- (1) G.O. dated 18th September 2003 was issued by the State of Uttarakhand for transfer of teachers of Basic Education. Clause 2 & 3 of this G.O. provides as under:- “izR;sd fo|ky; esa de ls de 02 f’k{kdksa dh rSukrh dh tk, vkSj 40 Nk= ij ,d f’k{kd ds fu/kkZfjr ekudkuqlkj 101 Nk= ij 03 v/;kidksa vkSj 141 Nk= la[;k ,oa mlls vf/kd ij pkSFks v/;kid dh O;oLFkk dh tk,A” “izR;sd twfu;j gkbZLdwy esa 01 foKku f’k{kd dh fu;qfDr vfuok;Z dh tk, vkSj lEiw.kZ tuin esa f’k{kdksa ds LohÑr inksa ds vk/kkj ij izR;sd fo|ky; esa iz/kkuk/;kid vkSj foKku v/;kid lfgr 04 f’k{kdksa dh rSukrh dh tk;A tgkW 01 twfu;j gkbZLdwy esa 05 f’k{kdksa ds in LohÑr gSa ogha nwljs fo|ky; esa iz/kkuk/;kid jfgr 03 gh f’k{kdksa ds in LohÑr gSa] bl vlekurk dks nwj fd;k tk,A” “tgkW 'kgjh ,oa lqfo/kktud LFkku ds fo|ky;kas esa ekud ls dgha vf/kd f’k{kd dk;Zjr gSa] ogha xzkeh.k ,oa nqxZe rFkk vfr nqxZe {ks=ksa esa fLFkr fo|ky;ksa esa fu/kkZfjr ekud ds vuqlkj f’k{kd dk;Zjr ugha gSaA blfy, ;g lqfuf’pr fd;k tk, fd fdlh Hkh fo|ky; esa LohÑr@ekud ls vf/kd f’k{kd fdlh Hkh fLFkfr esa dk;Zjr u jgsaA ekud ls vf/kd f’k{kdksa dh rSukrh ds fy, lEcfU/kr vf/kdkjh mRrjnk;h gksaxsA” On 9th July 2005, Director of Education issued order to transfer teachers where the strength of teachers in any school is in excess than the prescribed strength. The District Education Officers/Addl. District Education Officers following the guidelines, issued by Director on 09.07.2005, transferred the Headmaster where the strength of teachers has become in excess because of joining the school by the Headmaster. Consequently, the Director of Education has clarified its earlier order on 16.07.2005, which reads as under:- “izs"kd] funs'kd] fo|ky;h f’k{kk] mRrjkWpy] e;wj fogkj] nsgjknwuA lsok esa] 1- ftyk f’k{kk vf/kdkjh] :nziz;kx] 2- vij ftyk f’k{kk vf/kdkjh] csfld]:nziz;kxA i=kad csfld@13905&7@2005&06 fnukad 16 tqykbZ] 2005- fo"k;%& okf"kZd LFkkukUrj.k uhfr] 2005 ds varxZr izkFkfed fo|ky;ksa esa dk;Zjr iz/kkuk/;kid ,oa lgk;d v/;kidksa ds LFkkukarj.k ds lEcU/k esaA egksn;] mi;ZqDr fo"k;d funs’kky; ds i= la[;k csfld@12731&34@2005&06 fnukad 8 tqykbZ] 2005 dk lanHkZ xzg.k djus dk d"V djsa] ftlds }kjk vkidks funsZf’kr fd;k x;k Fkkfd ;fn fdlh fo|ky; esa 01 iz/kkuk/;kid vkSj 01 ls vf/kd lgk;d v/;kid dk;Zjr gksa rks ekud ls vf/kd v/;kid dh n’kk esa ckn esa vk;s lgk;d v/;kid dks ljIyl ekurs gq, LFkkukUrfjr fd;k tk;sxk] fdUrq [ksn gS fd vHkh Hkh funs’kky; ds laKku esa ;g ckr vk;h gS fd vkids }kjk fdlh izkFkfed fo|ky; esa ,d gh iz/kkuk/;kid gksus ij Hkh mls iz/kkuk/;kid dks ekud ls vf/kd ljIyl ekurs gq, LFkkukUrfjd dj fn;k x;k gSA tks fd mDr funsZ’kksZa ds foijhr gSA ;fn ;g rF; lgh gS rks ,slh fLFkfr esa vki rRdky dk;Zokgh djrs gq, mDr iz/kkuk/;kidksa dks vfxze dk;Zokgh rd dk;ZeqDr u djsaA blds lkFk gh lanfHkZr izdj.k ij vk[;k funs’kky; dks QSDl ls izsf"kr djsaA izfrdwy fLFkfr esa lEiw.kZ mRrjnkf;Ro vkidk gksxkA Hkonh;] ,l0ds0ekgs’ojh] funs’kd (ii) Letter dated 7th October 2005 was issued by the Director of School Education, Uttarakhand, Dehradun by which the number of teachers in an Institution has been prescribed on the basis of strength of students. It is further provided in the G.O. that in every Junior High School, there must be, at least, one Science Teacher as also one Headmaster/Headmistress. The relevant extract of the Govt. Order is reproduced hereunder:- “izs"kd] funs'kd] fo|ky;h f’k{kk] mRrjkWpy] e;wj fogkj] nsgjknwuA lsok esa] vij lfpo f’k{kk] mRrjkWpy 'kkluA i=kad@ csfld@35725@2005&06 fnukad 7 vDrwcj] 2005- fo"k;%& tuinksa ds izkFkfed ,oa mPp izkFkfed fo|ky;ksa esa v/;kidksa dh x.kuk ds lacaU/k esaA egksn;] tuinksa ds ifj"knh; izkFkfed ,oa mPp izkFkfed fo|ky;ksa esa Nk= v/;kid ekudksa ds lEcU/k esa mRrjkWpy funs’kky; esa miyC/k 'kklukns’kksa ,oa mRrj izns’k csfld f’k{kk ifj"kn~ ds funsZa’kksa ds vuqlkj vk[;k@izLrko fuEuor~ izsf"kr gSa%& vfoHkkftr jkT; mRrj izns’k esa csfld f’k{kk ifj"kn~ ds ifji= la[;k cs0f’k0i0@36244&611@87&88@fnukad 5-2-88 ¼Nk;kizfr layXu½ ds vuqlkj tuinksa ds izkFkfed ,oa mPp izkFkfed fo|ky;ksa esa 30 flrEcj dh Nk= la[;k dks vk/kkj ekudj fo|ky;okj 40&1 Nk=&v/;kid ds vuqikr esa v/;kidksa dh vko’;drk fu/kkZfjr fd;s tkus dk izkfo/kku fd;k x;k gSA mDr vuqikr ds vk/kkj ij izR;sd fo|ky; esa de ls de nks v/;kidksa dh O;oLFkk fd;s tkus ds lkFk gh 100 ls de Nk= la[;k gksus ij nks v/;kid] 100 Nk= la[;k ij rhu] 140 ij pkj v/;kid rFkk blh izdkj izR;sd 40 Nk=ksa ij ,d vfrfjDr v/;kid dh x.kuk dh tk;sxhA vFkkZr~ 40&1 ds ekud dk fu/kkZj.k fuEuor~ fd;k tk;sxk%& Nk= la[;k v/;kid la[;k 100 rd 02 101&140 03 141&180 04 181&220 05 221&260 06 mDr ds vuqlkj gh mRrjkaWpy 'kklu }kjk Hkh vkns’k la[;k 200@ cs0f’k0@2003 fnukad 18 flrEcj 2003 ¼Nk;kizfr layXu½ ds vuqlkj izkFkfed fo|ky;ksa esa v/;kidksa dh rSukrh gsrq funsZ’k fn;s x;s gSaA mRrjkWpy 'kklu ds vkns’k la[;k 200@cs0f’k0@2003 fnukad 18 flrEcj 2003 ¼Nk;kizfr layXu½ ds vuqlkj mPp izkFkfed fo|ky;ksa esa v/;kidksa dh rSukrh gsrq fuEu funsZ’k fn;s x;s gSa izR;sd twfu;j gkbZ Ldwy esa 01 foKku v/;kid dh fu;qfDr vfuok;Z fd;k tkuk rFkk lEiw.kZ tuinksa esa f’k{kdksa ds LohÑr inks ads vk/kkj ij izR;sd fo|ky; esa iz/kkuk/;kid vkSj foKku v/;kid lfgr 04 f’k{kdksa dh rSukrh dh tk,A tgkW ,d twfu;j gkbZ Ldwy esa 05 f’k{kdksa ds in LohÑr gSa] ogha nwljs fo|ky; esa iz/kkuk/;kid jfgr 03 gh f’k{kdksa ds in l`ftr gSa] bl vlekurk dks nwj fd;k tk,A (iii) Again on 12th December 2005 another G.O. was issued by the Education Department, State of Uttarakhand fixing the strength of teachers in an Institution. In respect to Primary Schools, according to this G.O., upto 100 students 2 teachers will be posted in an Institution and in respect of Senior Basic Schools 4 teachers will be posted in an Institution where the strength of student is upto 100. Under Clause-3 of this G.O. dated 12th December 2005, it is specifically stated that while counting the number of teachers in a particular Institution, the Headmaster will be included as a teacher for the purposes of fixing strength of the teachers. Relevant extract of the G.O. dated 12th December 2006 is being quoted below:- “izs"kd] Mh0ds0dksfV;k] lfpo] mRrjkWpy 'kklu]A lsok esa] funs’kd] fo|ky;h f’k{kk] mRrjkWpy] e;wj fogkj] nsgjknwuA f’k{kk vuqHkkx&1¼csfld½ nsgjknwu fnukad 12] fnlEcj] 2005- fo"k;%& tuinksa ds izkFkfed ,oa mPp izkFkfed fo|ky;ksa esa v/;kidksa dh x.kuk ds lacU/k esaA egksn;] mi;ZqDr fo"k;d vkids i=kad&csfld@35725@2005 fnukad 7-10-2005 ds Øe esa eq>s ;g dgus dk funsZ’k gqvk gS fd csfld f’k{kk ifj"kn~ m0iz0 ds ifji= la[;k cs0f’k0i0@36244&611@87&88 fnukad 5-2-88 da vuqlkj tuinksa ds izkFkfed ,oa mPp izkFkfed fo|ky;ksa esa 30 flrEcj dh Nk= la[;k dks vk/kkj ekudkj fo|ky;okj 40%1 Nk=&v/;kid ds vuqikr esa v/;kidksa dh vko’;drk fu/kkZfjr fd;s tkus dk izkfo/kku gSA 2- mDrkuqlkj gh] mRrjkWpy jkT; ds izkFkfed fo|ky;ksa esa 30 flrEcj dh Nk= la[;k dks vk/kkj ekudj fo|ky;okj 40%1 Nk= v/;kid ds vuqikr esa fuEukuqlkj v/;kid la[;k fu/kkZfjr dh tkrh gS%& Nk= la[;k v/;kid la[;k 100 rd 02 101&140 03 141&180 04 181&220 05 221&260 06 3- blh izdkj] mRrjkWpy jkT; ds mPp izkFkfed fo|ky;ksa esa 30 flrEcj dh Nk= la[;k dks vk/kkj ekudkj fo|ky;okj 40%1 Nk= v/;kid ds vuqikr esa fuEukuqlkj v/;kid la[;k ¼iz/kkuk/;kid dks lfEefyr djrs gq,½fu/kkZfjr dh tkrh gS%& Nk= la[;k v/;kid la[;k 100 rd 04 101&140 05 141&180 06 181&220 07 221&260 08 100 Nk= la[;k gsrq fu/kkZfjr 04 v/;kidksa esa ls fuEukuqlkj v/;kid gksus vko’;d gSaA izFke v/;kid& Hkk"kk f}rh; v/;kid& foKku@xf.kr r`rh; v/;kid& vaxzsth prqFkZ v/;kid& lkekU; 4- lkFk gh] bZth,l ,oa ,vkbZbZ dsUnz tks fd izkFkfed ,oa mPp izkFkfed Lrj ds gksrs gSa] esa rSukr fd;s tkus okys f’k{kk vkpk;ksZa ds lEcu/k esa Hkh ihVhvkj 1%40 ds vk/kkj ij vfrfjDr vkpk;Z rSukr fd;k tk;sxkA izkFkfed Lrj ij U;wure 100 cPpksa ij nks ,oa mPp izkFkfed Lrj esa 100 cPpksa ij U;wure 03 vkpk;Z gh yxk;s tk;saxs o vfrfjDr vkpk;Z dh O;oLFkk 100 ds ckn c<+us okyh la[;k ds fy, ykxw gksxhA (iv) Again on 13th July 2007, the Govt. of Uttarakhand issued G.O. in respect of transfer of Junior Basic School