IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1036/2011 Date of decision: 9.3.2011 Lakhwinder Singh ....................Petitioner v. Hoshiar Singh and others .....................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.VK Sandhir,Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) Applicant/petitioner has filed the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution assailing the order dated 17.11.2010(P4) passed by learned Civil Judge (Sr.Div.) Amritsar whereby his application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for being impleaded as a a respondent has been declined. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the respondent-plaintiff/Hoshiar Singh has filed a suit for declaration against respondents 2 to 5-Punjab State Electricity Board, for grant of interest on the delayed payment on pensionary benefits, yet in the suit allegations have been made against applicant with regard to filing of a false complaint which led to an enquiry being held and withholding of pensionary benefits till the completion of enquiry. It is stated that the petitioner apprehends adverse findings against him and therefore, his prayer for being impleaded as a party. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner I find no merit in the present revision petition. The issue in the suit is with regard to delayed payment of retiral benefits by the employer i.e. Punjab State Electricity Board. It is not disputed that there is no issue with regard to conduct of the petitioner/applicant. Accordingly, I am in agreement with the findings of the learned trial Court that the petitioner is neither a necessary nor a proper party. Dismissed. 9.3.2011 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge