IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9656 of 2009 SURENDRA KUMAR SINGH @ SURENDRA PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 02 25.03.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Vigilance. The petitioner is an accused in Vigilance P.S. Case No. 43 of 2008/Special Case No. 30 of 2008 under Sections 420, 427, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code read with under Section 13 (2), 13 (I) (D) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. In this renewed application for anticipatory bail the submission is of willingness to deposit the amount in question. That cannot be a sufficient ground in the nature of allegations to re-consider the prayer for anticipatory bail. Any application for grant of regular bail shall be decided by the court below on its own merit in light of the submission made on behalf of the petitioner without being prejudiced by the present order. The application is rejected. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)