W HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. 6763 of 2007 PETITIONER S.K. Chaturvedi, sfo lane Shri RD. Chatmvedi,‘ aged about 58 years, Occupation Sub-Engineer, Electrical] Mechanical Public Health Enginecring Department, Janjgir Champa (C.G) -— R/o near Nova 0&ce, Ware House Road Kududand, Bilaspur (C. G). Versus ESPONDENTS 1. Stats of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Public Health Engineering, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C. G). 2. Engineer-in—Chief, Deparunent of Public Health Engineering, Raipm‘ (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN - OF mum Appearance: Ku. Deepali Pandey, counsel for the peu'tioner. Shri Pradeep Singh, P.L. appears for me State on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (17.11.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heald on admission. Learned counsel. for the peu‘u‘oner arguing, that While passing the order dated 18.6.2007 in W.P.No.515/2005, this Court directed for preparation of complete separate gradation list for degree holders and diploma holders and thereafter for consider'au'on of their promotion. She submits that the State is not taking interest as per the directions issued by this Court in W.P.No.515/ 2005 and the order passed by this Court was kept in abeyance due to which, the persons like petitioner, who are at the verge of retirement, are not getting any beneht of the said order passed by this Court. She submits that looking to the reluctance of the State, the peu’tioner has. med a representation and when nothing was done on his representation, he has to nle this petition. ‘\\ R W.P.[S) No. 6763 of 2007 So far as relief no.1 is ooncemed, there is no necessity of giving direction in this regard because there is a detailed oxder. of ,this Court in W.P.No.515/05 and the State is‘bound, to: comply with the said Older. Relief no.2 is a consequential relief and no petition can be entertained for the said relief at this stage in View of the earlier onier passed by this Court. Therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition at this stage. However, it is observed that if the replesentatimr (Annexure P—4) med by the petitioner in this regard has not been disposed of so far, the Concerned authority should dispose of the same at the earliest to maintain and achieve the spirit of the earlier order passed by the Court- This petition, stands nnally disposed ofwith the aimesaid observation. i v C.c. as per rules. Sd/- I Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge /Ra0/