THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3811 of 2009 ORDER: The respondents issued tender notices, dated 27.11.2008, inviting tenders for printing and supply of “Posters, Booklets & Hand Bills in Telugu, English and Urdu Languages” of different sizes. The petitioner submitted tender for the printing and supply of Posters, Booklets and Hand Bills. However, his tender was not considered at the technical evaluation stage, on the ground that it did not possess DTP/Computer and a Diesel Power Generating Set. The petitioner filed W.P.No.28684 of 2008. The writ petition was disposed of on 22.01.2009, directing the respondents to verify the availability or otherwise of DTP/Computer and diesel power generating set with the petitioner. In compliance with the directions issued by this Court, the respondents arranged for inspection of the facilities with the petitioner. The Special Commissioner, Information and Public Relations Department, Hyderabad, addressed a letter, dated 09.02.2009, to the petitioner, stating that the inspection by the technical committee revealed that there is no Power Generation Set within the premises and the one available near the printing press of the petitioner was on a trolley, said to have been hired from an agency. The petitioner challenges the said letter. It is stated that the printing press has all the facilities and the impugned letter was issued only with a view to prevent the petitioner from competing with others. Heard Smt.A.Anasuya, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Government Pleader for Genegal Administration Department. The evaluation of the tenders in pursuance of the notices, referred to above, was at two stages. At the initial stage, the technical feasibility of the tenderers is to be evaluated with reference to the specified conditions. Thereafter, price-bid for such of the tenders cleared at that stage would be opened. The tender of the petitioner was rejected at the first stage. On being impressed by the contention of the petitioner that the facilities available with it are not properly noticed and evaluated, this Court issued a direction in W.P.No.28684 of 2008 that a meticulous inspection shall be caused. Inspection as directed by this Court was conducted. The findings of the inspection are reflected in the impugned letter. The relevant portion reads as under: “As verified by the technical committee during the inspection on 30.01.2009, it is found that the D.G. set is not a stationery one but vehicle mounted Diesel Generator Set kept outside the press premises. Moreover it is also observed that work order for D.G. set was issued in the letter dated 05.04.2008 M/s Card Box company, Hyderabad addressed to M/s S.D. Sound and Electrical works, Hyderabad which is of no value. Hence, the technical committee rejected your technical bid.” From this, it becomes clear that the petitioner has arranged a Generator only on ad hoc basis. It was not installed on regular basis. The petitioner does not deny the findings, contained in the letter. A Generator with the description and condition, as mentioned in the letter, cannot be said to be in fulfillment of the stipulated condition. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J. Dated:26.02.2009 GJ