IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38599 of 2008 1.JIMEDAR MAHTO S/o- Doman Mahto R/o- Village – Tendua Ratanpura, P.S.- Mali, District- Aurangabad At present Aman Kumar, House No. – 3109, Rampati Ka Bera, Raghupura-2, Gali No. 4, Gandhi Nagar, Old Delhi Versus 1.STATE OF BIHAR 2. KANTI DEVI, At present residence of C/o- Nand Kishore Mahto, Village-Piparghat, P.S. Hariharganj, District- Aurangabad, Jharkhand ----------- 2. 03.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 498(A), 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner, who is husband of the complainant has been made accused in this case though in whole of the complaint, there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. As a matter of fact, the complainant, herself left the matrimonial home and soon thereafter, the complainant married with another person and from the said wed lock, she has two children as stated in paragraph-5 of the petition. Having considered the submissions, as - 2 - noticed above, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Aurangabad in connection with Complaint Case No. 218/99 corresponding to Trial No. 625 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)