IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.786 of 2008 RAM BALAK ROY, S/O LATE JHAKHURI ROY, R/O OF MAUDA, P.S. BIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. ................Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH SECRETARY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SAMASTIPUR. 3. DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, SAMASTIPUR. 4. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BI BHUTIPUR, SAMASTIPUR. 5. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, BIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. 6. SHOBHA DEVI WIFE OF DEVENDRA KUMAR RAI, @ KALLU RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MAUDA, P.S. BIBHUTIPUR, P.O.-MAUDA, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. ................ Respondents ----------- 03 20.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that though he had moved under old Rules before the Collector, and the matter has been taken up before this Hon'ble Court now under the new Rules of 2007, it has to go before the District Programme Officer. In that view of the matter, let the petitioner move before the District Programme Officer, who shall look into the matter, and after giving notice to the respondent no. 6 and all the parties concerned, shall hear the matter and pass a reasoned order. The petitioner is directed to approach the District Programme Officer alongwith a certified copy of this order within four weeks from today and thereafter the District Programme Officer shall not unnecessarily delay the matter and try to dispose of the matter within two months thereafter after giving notice to all the 2 concerned parties. It is made clear that if he does not co-operate, the District Programme Officer shall proceed with the matter after recording a proper order giving reasons as to why he has moved ex-parte. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Safik (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)