^v0^^ %^%":....--n -3 ^ L•^ -^T. "I^cffsW^ ^^^^ ^^ &^y- |N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) ^Z5^-. * W.P.(C) N0. M^ OF 2009. , Be.ieN:':' INTHE MATTER OF: PETITIONER M/S.MOHAN MEAKIN LTD., a Company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, having its registered Office at Solan Brewery, Shimla Hills, Solan, Himanchal Pradesh being represented by its Fiancial Director .. .. . Petitioner. -VERSUS- 1. State of Chhatishgarh through its Secretary, department of Excise, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhatishgarh). 2. CommissionerofExcise,Raipur,Chhatishgarh. 3. M/S. SENTINI BIO PRODUCT (P) Ltd., Plot No.1229, Road No.60, Jubulee Hills, Hyderabad,Andhra Praddesh being represented through its Managing Director RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES-226^ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS ETC. AND/OR FOR ORDERS AND/OR FOR DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF WRITS: HjGH COURT OF CHHATT1SGARH : BiLASPUR PETiTIONER RESPONDENT WRIT PETITION (C) N0.2670 OF 2009 M/s Mohan Meakin Ltd. Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Wrlt Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitutlon of india) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Somnath Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 26th day ofJuiy, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitlon has become infructuous and, as such, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition, to vvhich learned counsei appearing for the State has no objection. 2) it Is ordered, as prayed for. 3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ^ Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge