IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 872 of 2010 Date of decision:- 18.3.2010 Rajesh Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present:- Mr. S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. RAM CHAND GUPTA J.(Oral) The present revision-petition has been filed against the order dated 21.1.2010 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Ludhiana, vide which application filed under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for recalling the witnesses Jagtar Singh-PW3 and Executive Officer of Municipal Committee, Khanna PW-8 for further cross-examination was dismissed. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully. PW3-Jagtar Singh and PW-8 Executive Officer of Municipal Committee, Khanna were already examined before the learned trial Court and full opportunity of cross-examination on behalf of accused was given. Petitioner- accused was convicted by learned trial Court and appeal against the judgment was filed before the learned Sessions Judge, Ludhiana. During the pendency of the appeal, present application for recalling the witnesses Jagtar Singh PW-3 and Executive Officer of M.C.Khanna PW-8 was filed on the plea that cross- examination was not conducted properly and however, the same was dismissed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana vide order dated 21.1.2010.. It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that cross- examination was not conducted upon these witnesses properly and that the material questions have not been put to these witnesses. Copy of the application has not been attached with this petition. Criminal Misc.No. M- 872 of 2010 -2- Only copy of order is annexed. Perusal of order shows that nothing has been mentioned as to what material questions were left and as to whether no such application was also moved before the learned trial Court when he was having sufficient time. Statement of PW3 Jagtar Singh was recorded on26.9.2002, whereas the statement of PW-8 was recorded on 28.4.2005 and the judgment was passed by learned trial Court on 31.8.2007. In view of these facts, it cannot be said that any material illegality or irregularity has been committed by learned Appellate Court by dismissing the application filed by the present revision-petitioner vide impugned order dated 21.1.2010. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed, being devoid of any merit. March 18, 2010 ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) vj JUDGE