^f)^v1^0^rC9 IN THE STXKS SDMINISTRM'iyE TRIBUNAL. ;MP SJABALRTR O.A.No PSTITIOi.fEE i APPLTC&NT" t'^.- T?.<^TT(2. VA>.^yS'U13: RESPOK'DSNTS s - NON-tiPPLICAKFTS /1SS5 San'tosa Kumar Ka.shyap» s/o Shri Bisahuran Kashyap,eged abo'.'t 31 yaass, s/o villags- Bstarl, Fost-Malhar,distric' BilaspursM.P. l.5tate of H.P«, tl-u:CT^gh- Seceetary, s'orsst De'pa.tt~ Tnent, vallabh 3'navan, i^nojpQ.-L, * 2.Conseryator of. porest, Bilaspur cii:cl£, Bilaspur, r'i s i-» 3.Div'isionsl s'ssest. officee Korfca j?orest Dlvlslont Koriaa.iM.^. SSSf.TlS OP AP!3LICZC'IOM hl, -A^ '*^-' .. Ji "F'~C;"R!^. ^- L- ? j- y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRtT PETITION (Sl N0.1098 of 2005 PETITIONER Santosh Kumar Kashyap Versus RESPONDENTS State of Madhya Pradesh and others Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri SaUsh K. Aanihotri. J. Present: - None for the petitioner. Shri A. V. Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passedon this 06 day of November, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. (2) tn view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge unane —--—1 E- ^