IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 687 of 2006 (M/B) 1. Nagendra 2. Nikku 3. Nitin (minor) through his father Narendra All S/o Sri Narendra Patwari, All R/o Village Kudkawala, 4. Police Station Doiwala, District Dehradun. Banty S/o Sri Mahendra Singh, R/o Village Shaktiwala, Police Station Doiwala, District Dehradun. …….. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Secretary, (Hone), Civil Secretariat, Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 2. Station House Officer, Police Station Doiwala, District Dehradun.. 3. Diwan Singh S/o Sri Moti Lal, R/o Village Jharaund, P.S. Doiwala, District Dehradun. ……. Respondents Mr Bhupendra Bisht, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners.. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent No. 3. JUDGEMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Mr Bhupendra Bisht, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners.. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent No. 3. 2. Mr. M.A. Khan, the learned State Counsel submits that the writ petition filed by petitioners Nagendra, Nikku, Nitin and Banty seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them, now, has become infructuous, as the Police, after the completion of the investigation, has filed charge sheet against the petitioners before the concerning court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim order dated 15.06.2006 stands vacated automatically. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 12.09.2006 12.09.2006 G