IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25362 of 2010 JIRO SADA S/O LATE JANAK SADA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 27.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 395 and 412/224/225 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report but his house was searched on suspicion, from where 1400 rupees were recovered but has clean antecedents. In view of such, let the petitioner, who is in custody since 26.11.2006 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge Ist, Supaul, in S.Tr.No. 120/07/241/07, arising out of Raghopur P.S. case no. 18/04, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )