THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI Civil Revision Petition No. 5688 of 2009 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 19- 9-2009 made in I.A. No. 90 of 2008 in O.A. No. 6 of 2008 on the file of the A.P. Wakf Tribunal, Hyderabad. Revision petitioner herein is the petitioner/applicant and the respondents are the defendants in the above O.A. The revision petitioner filed the above I.A. under Sec 151 CPC requesting the Wakf Tribunal to stay the operation of the proceedings No. B2/18/KNL-99-Supp. Dated 7-2-2007 appointing the respondent No.1 by the respondent No.2 to manage the affairs of the Darga on the ground that the High Court directed respondent no.2 to decide the matter of towliath between the petitioner and Syed Dastagir Basha Quadri, but in contrary the respondent No.2 Wakf Board appointed respondent No.1 for the said purpose. The said petition was resisted by respondent No.1 by filing a counter stating that the O.A filed by the petitioner itself is not maintainable and is filed with malafide intention and that the petitioner is neither the Sajjada nor the Mutawalli of the subject Darga and that he is maintaining the properties of the Darga and that the petitioner did not elucidate the details of the nature of loss or hardship which he would incur if the IA is not allowed and therefore prayed to dismiss the I.A. The Tribunal after considering the material on record dismissed the petition. Aggrieved against the said order, the present civil revision petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the court below ought to have disposed of the I.A on merits and that the 1st respondent has no hereditary claim as Mutawali and the petitioner’s ancestors were the notified Mutawallis and that the trial court failed to see the directions of this Court in CRP No. 2068 of 2009 dt.1-5- 2009 to dispose of the I.A No. 90 of 2008 within one month and the main O.A No. 6 of 2008 within three months and contrary to the directions of High Court the Presiding Officer conducted enquiry and also failed to see the financial loss to the Darga and therefore the order of the court below is liable to be set aside. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and as seen from the order under revision passed by the Wakf Board, it reveals that the main O.A itself is coming up for disposal and that the relief asked by the petitioner therein can be answered in the main O.A. Under the above circumstances and in view of the submission made that there is urgency involved in the matter and that purpose in filing the O.A would be defeated if delay is caused, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would be met if the Wakf Board is directed to dispose of the main O.A itself within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above directions, this civil revision petition is disposed of. No costs. _____________________________ dt.03-12-2009 JUSTICE T MEENA KUMARI kvrk THE HON’BLE SMT.JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI Civil Revision Petition No. 5688 of 2009 03-12-2009