:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1291 OF 2006 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.599 OF 2005 Desh Deepak H. Bhalla ..Plaintiff. Vs. Veco Engineering Ltd. & Ors. ..Defendants. And Sanjay Jagasia ..Respondent. Mr.H.H.Shah i/b.Mr.D.R.Shah for the Plaintiff. Mr.B.R.Zaveri for the Defendants. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 30TH JANUARY, 2008 DATED : 30TH JANUARY, 2008 DATED : 30TH JANUARY, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : There is no case for perjury. At the highest, if the submission before the learned Judge was incorrect, it was based on an incorrect computation. That could always have been pointed out before the learned Judge. 2. What is suggested is that the submissions before the learned Judge were false and not that the submissions in the affidavit were false 3. In the circumstances, the Notice of Motion is dismissed. 4. It is clarified that the contentions in this regard are kept open at the final hearing of the suit.