IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 78 OF 2002 CLINT DE BARROS AND ORS ... Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND ORS ... Respondent None for the petitioner. Mr. Guru Shirodkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR & R. S. MOHITE, JJ. Date:- 17th August, 2007 P.C. None present for the petitioners. Mr. Shirodkar present for the respondents. Considering the facts disclosed in the petition and the annexures to the petition, we do not find any case being made out for issuance of the directions prayed for. As regards the grievance about the misappropriation of the public exchequer by the persons named in the petition in the course of running of the high school, the Director of Education may consider the petition itself as a complaint made to him. On going through the matter, it is seen that there are disputed questions of facts raised in this petition and it would not be possible to adjudicate the said issues in this writ petition. In our opinion, it would be appropriate to leave to the Director of Education to look into the matter and take appropriate decision and/or action as may be required in the facts and circumstances of the case. As regards the direction for criminal investigation in the matter, the petitioners are at liberty to file necessary proceedings in that regard before appropriate authorities and/or Court. With the above observations, the petition is disposed of. Rule stands discharged. No order as to costs. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. R. S. MOHITE, J. ssm.