IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.20127 of 2010 Tofik Ahmed & others Vs. The State of Haryana & another Present: Mr.R.S.Bains, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Petitioners initially were not being interviewed on the ground that the degree obtained by them was from State other than Haryana. The petitioners were interviewed under the directions of this Court. Thereafter, the respondents were not declaring the result and the petitioners were forced to file a contempt petition. The result of the petitioners has now been declared. The petitioners have not been able to make grade on merits. Now their grievance is that the criteria, which was adopted for making selection, was unfair and not disclosed prior to the selection time. Once the petitioners have competed and have been un-successful, it will not be now fair for them to challenge the criteria adopted. Otherwise also, the criteria does not seem to be suffering from any vice or discrimination, which would call for any interference. Dismissed. November 11, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE