IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID FRIDAY, THE 11TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 20TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29403 of 2011(A) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- P.P.AJITHKUMAR,P.W.D.CONTRACTOR, 'PUTHENPURACKAL' HOUSE,NELLAD.P.O, MUVATTUPUZHA-686721. BY ADVS. SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.DEEPU LAL MOHAN SMT.S.LEENA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. KOTHAMANGALAM MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KOTHAMANGALAM-686691. 2. THE SECRETARY,KOTHAMANGALAM MUNICIPALITY KOTHAMANGALAM-686691. BY ADV.SRI.V.M.KURIAN, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: STU WP(C).No. 29403 of 2011(A) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS : EXT.P1: THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE AGREEMENT NO.79/08-09 DT:9/3/2009 ENTERED INTO BY THE PETITIONER WITH THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE IST RESPONDENT MUNICIPALITY. EXT.P2: THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DATED 21-05-2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DT:09-07-2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE TH 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: THE PHOTOCOPYL OF THE NOTICE NO.D.O.E/80/E2/10 DT:08-02-2010 ISSUED BY THE GEOLOGIST TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER NO.D.O.E/80/E2/10 DT:21-07-2010 OF THE GEOLOGIST ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P6: THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER NO.D.O.E/80/E2/10 DATED 26-04-2011 OF THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P7: THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER 07-07-2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE. STU HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.29403 Of 2011 ---------------------- Dated this the 11th day of November, 2011. J U D G M E N T The writ petition is filed seeking a direction commanding the respondents to relieve the petitioner from the work 'Kothamangalam Municipal Bus Stand First Phase' without any risk and cost and after disbursing the amounts due to the petitioner for the work already done by the petitioner or in the alternative to issue a direction commanding the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P7 application in accordance with law and within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. 2. When the matter was taken up for consideration in the admission list today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Ext.P7 application is pending consideration before the 2nd respondent and requests this Court to issue a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P7 application within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. ::2:: W.P.(C).No.29403 Of 2011 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and standing counsel for the respondents. In the facts stated above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P7 application within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. HARUN-UL-RASHID, Judge. bkn/-