IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.8945 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 19, 2011. Jal Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Jangvir Singh Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner was a candidate for appointment as Lambardar of village Amru, Tehsil and District Palwal alongwith respondent No.5 and one more candidate. The vacancy had accrued due to the death of the father of respondent No.5 who was earlier the Lambardar of the village. The petitioner alleges that respondent No.5 has been given preference on the basis of certain forged and fabricated documents. The petitioner accordingly seeks a direction to the authorities to verify his allegations and take action against respondent No.5. It is not in dispute that only recommendation has been made in favour of respondent No.5 and the final decision regarding appointment of CWP No.8945 of 2011 [2] the Lambardar is yet to be taken by the Deputy Commissioner-cum Collector, Palwal. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 that the allegations made by the petitioner regarding alleged forged and fake documents produced by respondent No.5, be examined by the Collector while taking a final decision in the matter. Ordered accordingly. This order, however, shall not be construed to mean as if the allegations levelled by the petitioner against respondent No.5 have been accepted by this Court. Dasti. May 19, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE