IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(Crl.).No. 69 of 2010(S) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- SUGATHA PANICKER, S/O.SOMASEKHARA PANICKER, AGED 61 YEARS, RAVI MANDIRAM, MANGAD P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE SRI.T.K.SREENARAYANA DAS RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KILIKOLLOOR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM. 4. SHAM V.DEV, SHAM NIVAS, NJACKANAL, PERINADU (PO), KOLLAM. 5. VASUDEVAN, SHAM NIVAS, NJACKANAL, PERINADU (PO), KOLLAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER, SMT. K. PUSHPALATHA. R4 BY ADV. SRI.AJAYA KUMAR. G THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(Crl.).No. 69 of 2010(S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.126/10 DATED 08.02010 OF KILIKOLLOOR POLICE STATION. /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan & P.S. Gopinathan, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(Crl.) No. 69 OF 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 24th of February, 2010 JUDGMENT Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan , J. Read the order dated 22.02.10. Following the aforesaid order, the petitioner’s daughter Sukanya and the 4th respondent, the son of the 5th respondent, are married. They are present. Sukanya’s mother is also present. We record that the ceremonial marriage between the 4th respondent and Sukanya has been solemnized as per hindu religious rites. Certificate to that effect has been issued by the Sree Narayana Dharma Samajam, Ayyappankavu. The said certificate has been issued by the Secretary of the Sree Narayana Dharma Samajam, Ayyappankavu to enable further registration. 2. The learned counsel for the 4th respondent states that, the marriage will be duly registered in terms of the Common Rules. Let that be done at the earliest and the 4th respondent shall ensure that a copy of that certificate is placed along with an affidavit before the Registrar General of this Court within a period WP(Crl) No. 69 of 2010 -:2:- of two months. On production of that, it will stand incorporated in this file by the force of this judgment. The W.P.(Crl) is closed accordingly. Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Judge P.S. Gopinathan, Judge ttb