THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.9043 of 2010 ORAL ORDER: The learned counsel appearing on either side fairly conceded that the issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.8090 of 2010 dated 12.4.2010 and therefore, this writ petition is also liable to be disposed of in terms of the said order. In view of the above, following the order passed in the above writ petition, this writ petition is disposed of declaring that the petitioner is entitled for continuity of service and to all the benefits of contract employment, which are extended to the similarly placed contract employees. Accordingly, the order of the appellate authority to the extent of treating petitioner’s reinstatement as a fresh engagement, stands quashed. Petitioner is however entitled for continuity of service and attendant benefits of contract employment. Further, in this case, there is no necessity of conducting any enquiry in view of the findings recorded by the appellate authority while reinstating the petitioner afresh. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 25.6.2010 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.9043 of 2010 25.6.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.9043 of 2010 Date: 25th June, 2010 Between: N.Mangamma .. Petitioner And The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Nalgonda Region, Nalgonda and another. .. Respondents