S/o Roopchand Agrawai Aged agent 30 years Occnpman BJsmw, R/o Sadar Pam, RaJgarh, Tah & Dim. — Raigarh (c. G. ) VERSUS i RESPQNDEI‘JTS ’ E. Shri Shiv Shakti Steal - ( Privatx: Ltd, Chakmdhm‘pur Tah § & 117w; Raign‘h(C.G.). lhi‘ough the Chamnam Shn' Kedar Natl} Mittal, S/o Jayial Agrawal, aged about 44 yams, Pmmi Addrass — Laxmi Kunj Maiya Embaii (£mkh2n1d) Prasentiy R$iding ~ Nayagarg, hwari Fhmr, Sada Bazar, Raga-h, Tah. & Distt. Raga-h (CG) Shri Sushil Kumar, S/o Shi‘i Natthuran Agrawal, aged abaut 36 yeaS, Oocuyaiian — amass, R/o Sada Bazar, Raigarh, Tail. & Qstt. Raigar‘n (CG) State ofMsgarh Thmugh we f Collector Ragam, [31511 Rmgarh xCG) C‘..P.C §N THE EIGH COURT OF JUDXCATURE AT BEAS?UR' MAM). 11f OF2m3 wgle Bench APPELLANT i / Vishal mar Agrawai WSCELLANEOUS A?PEAL UNDER ORDER 3/3 RULE Q) IAOF . ‘ ’ MW \Q/H WI- §ai$ “a 2°03 v marm (WE) ma?m%ama mm§w aiwma S,B. Hon‘ble Shri Justice N.K. Aaarwa! 17.2.2G10 Shri Sanjeev Banjare, Advocate for appenant. Shri SRJ Jaiswal, Adv cate for respondent No. 1‘ Shri Sameer Behar, P el Lawyer for State. Learned counsel appe ring for appellant submits that wfth the passage of time this app f hae become infruotuous. Accordingly, the appe l ls dlsmiseed as having become lnfructuous. No order astoc ts. Consequently, pendin" applications, stand ca'lsposed/of. M(C)P Nor 1979/03 also stands disposed of. Sahu um} ; / A / / gala K, AWM‘ 5o ‘V N- Judge ,rx/ amo‘mo oh 7 H EincLMAm:§.312‘..-_ng§m¢ 26\“92’ ( D