IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 26.07.2010 COCP No.729 of 2010 Harsh Vardhan Mittal ...Petitioner Versus T.C.Gupta and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. A.S.Gagrha, Advocate, for Mr. P.K.Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Khanna, Advocate, for the respondents. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) On 11.5.2009, this Court directed the respondents to allot another plot to the petitioner of same size, in the same sector and on the same terms and conditions. Today Ms. Preeti Khanna, learned counsel for the respondents has produced a copy of Memo No.2769 dated 01.07.2010 pointing out that plot No.1032-AAP, Sector-38, Gurgaon has been allotted to the petitioner. The said plot is in the same sector and on the same terms and conditions as of plot No.322-B, Sector-38, Gurgaon. In view of the said fact, no further orders are called for in the present contempt petition. Consequently, the same is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Rule discharged. 26.07.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE