'^.^ .•:.::'?t;'^!;:^^^^A^;^S;^LT^'''V-^-T^^^-y;^^ T^ V^/~L^/\I'\/^L/"-•~^. cfr^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF CHHATT]»fcARHAT BILASPUR W.P.No.^2SOf2003. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS /- Fulmat Bai.wife ofDukhit Ram, aged about years, Sarpanch, Village Gadadih, Tahsil Dhamda, District Durg (C.G) :.^;^ VERSUS s'*^ -• .^^""" ^•^"^" ^^S^€^^ ^^^^^fff^ ^'^a'.pop.%'<''':" ^•^^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Panchayat and rural Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), 2. Union of India, Through the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Pariiament Street, New Delhi, 3. Additional Collector, Collectorate building, G.E. Road, Durg (Chhattisgarh), 4. State of M.P., Through the Secretary, Panchayat apd Rural Department, Vallabh Bh^an, Bhopal (M.P). PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OE^ONSTITUTION OF INDIA iBSMi i^Ei^ a-HC-22 "3^ -<<l'!41fl<j, »fl1u'Ko, I6«11«1< ^.^.^^ HWWI 9)*<iq> 200 fa*i<s' 3i1^I'iH Pt-ii'* 3n^( ?ftH!<ft tif??1 an^i ^gro ^ife *wl<'i<ii-f iiicff'^is'st <r»it<;^ 1; 3)PgH 3II^?t DB: Hon'bte JuaUce K. H. B. Kn^aaen. OJ. 8s Hon'bfe Jnattce L. C. Bhadoln, J. 1S/10/2003 Petitioner by Sbri H. B. Ases^sd, Advocate. Respondents No, l aaS. 3 Advocate Qeneral. By fhis writ . petition unjlcr Artfctes 226/227 of fhe Constitution of India the p^tittonCT has ehaltenspd (he constitutfonal vaUdity and the vites of Sectton 36 (l)(m) of the Cfaltattisgarh Paacbswat Raj Avann^ (for shon ftie Adlun^am) wluch ls)re down that no person shaU be cl^ible to be aa ofifec-bcarcr of thj two living cfaildnai onc of whoin Janiiaiy; 2001. Thc chaBcngc to t4c abovc clausc docs not survivc in view of the law laid down bv the »y Shri Smifl Sinha, Additioiial Gram Swaeaj iAdhnuyam, 1993 F Panchavat who has morc than te bom on or aflcr 26th dav of ^onlale Apex Court in the case of Jswed and othaw Vs. State ®fH|uyaiia aad othen reported tn 2003 AIR 8CW 3893 and also in jriew of fhe order passed by tifcus Coiirt in the case af Yarinraat Kiuiuur Sdiu V». State of ^adiatttegnh an4 tnpther paa^l in Wrtt Petltton Bo. 463 of 2002.72 . o^ '^ ['T^ ^Rsi^ sE3Hiiit^te%^^feyy^^ij^' ^.._ afr.^ii'itk; XI-HC-22 '3^ -41'!11cf<1,. afll'M'is, fawwy ^o.p.,t^to--s-2-<y|o wwtTafflict; 280 sn^fqn R-li?b 311^1 5tiHicti ^fi^l .;<"-^'?\v C'<<1 '^ <ffl^?i ^diw ^iisa <<il<ii<-idl-i HWdi^tezt <I<II«(K ^aipOT-3)1^1 Tbc pctitioner has also chal|cngcd thc oidcr of reiaoval passcd by the Additioital Collector, Dmd dated 24*h December 2002. The petitk>aer has efficacious altemati|ve renicdy to fife an appeal before thc Director of Pancliayat on fhe |factual grounds against fhe order passed by fhe CoBector. In view of the above therc peti.tioner, fbe aasae js liable to tje.disinissed aud it is dismisscd. However, thc petitioncr shaD be ^t libei?ty to fife appcal before thc Director of Panchayat against fhe by wUch she 'bss been declared |is no force in the petition crf the oidea- dated 24th December, 2002 disquaUfcd to contmue as ofBce bearer of thc ViUagc Paachaya|t Gadadceh, Tehsil- Dhamdha, .District-Durg. The petitioner wfll linutatton for th.e time spent by hcjr in Utigating befbrc this Court m this vndt proceedlng. Thc partfes EBC cntitlcd fer c^rtificd copy of this oidcr. be entitted to thc beaefit of the Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- LC.Bhadoo Judge [^ ^Pa<l