1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi WRIT PETITION NO. 1793 OF 2009 . M/s. Jupiter Construction & Anr. ...Petitioners. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr. H.S. Anand, a/w. Mrs. Sarita S. Donde, for Petitioners. Mr. R.R. Bhosale, AGP, for Respondent No.1. Mr. J.G. Aradwad, for Respondent No.2. Mr. Atul Damle, a/w. Mr. J.P. Dubey, for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5. .... CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 16TH SEPTEMBER 2009. P.C. The learned Advocate appearing for respondent no.2 Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) has at the outset submitted that the petitioners by the present petition have impugned the S.R.A.’s order dated 16 th May 2009 rejecting the proposal of the petitioners and the petitioners are, therefore, required to impugn the said order before the High Power Committee. The learned Advocate for the petitioners disputes the submission advanced on behalf of the S.R.A. and relies on the letter of 2 S.R.A. dated 6 th August 2009 (Exhibit-Q to the petition), to show that his proposal is not rejected. 2. After hearing the parties for some time, the following order is passed by consent of all the parties before the Court :- (i) The petitioners shall impugn the decision of the S.R.A. dated 16 th May 2009 before the High Power Committee, within a period of two weeks from today. (ii) Parties shall maintain status-quo as of today for a period of two weeks after which the petitioners shall be at liberty to move the High Power Committee for extension of the order of status- quo. (iii) The High Power Committee shall endeavour to decide the issues/disputes within a period of eight weeks from today. (iv) All rights and contentions of the parties are kept open. 3. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of, with no orders as to costs. [ S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ]