1 ABA 243-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.243 OF 2011 Punjaji Sitaram Late .Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ors .Respondents Mr.Rohan Sonawane, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.P.P.Shinde, APP, for Respondent No.1 - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 20TH APRIL, 2011 P.C. . This is an application for anticipatory bail by a Director of a Corporation which is registered in Nagpur and had duped people in Konkan area. The offence which is registered is in respect of misappropriation of Rs.1,04,000/-. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant is not at all involved in the misappropriation of any amount, but in order to show his bonafide, he would deposit Rs. 10,000/- as he is one of the Directors of the 2 ABA 243-2011 Corporation. It is not clear as to why the applicant's custodial interrogation is required. In view of this, in the event of applicant's arrest in C.R.No.47 of 2008 registered at Ratnagiri Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He be released on bail on his furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.25,000/- on the following conditions. (i) The applicant shall deposit an amount of Rs.10,000/- within a period of two weeks from today, before the learned Trial Court which the learned Magistrate shall invest in the interest earning deposit and deal with it at the end of the trial as per the result of the trial. If the amount is not so deposited, the order shall stand revoked. (ii) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by C.I.D. Officer, Pune on 27th April, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. and thereafter, as and when required by the investigating officer. (iii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any 3 ABA 243-2011 police officer. (iv) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. 2. Criminal Application is disposed of. . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court dated 2nd December, 2010 delivered in Special Leave Petition (Cri.) No.7615 of 2009 (Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State of Maharashtra And Ors.). (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)