/11 ^too^ INTHEHIGHCOURTOFeHHATTISGARI-IATBiLASPUR WP NOi.;.^fcc^.l..J2003 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^^^••"' ,-^^ ^7' ,^v.l <^' Arjunlal Kedia S/o Late Dwarika Prasad Kedia yAged about52 years, R/o Rishda Road, Baloda Elazar, PoliceStation Baloda Bazar, Distt.Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Home Affairs Government ofChhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) TheSuperintendentofPolice, Raipu^ Distt. Raipur (C.G.) DistrictMagistrate, Raipur, DisttRaipur (C.G.) Stafion House Officer, P.S. Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur(C.G.) District Prosecution qfficer, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. 3. 4. 5. WRITPETmONUNDERARTICLE22E QFINDIA 1 PARTICULARS OF THE PEnTIONERS: As stated above in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARSOFrHERESROSNDENTS As stated above in the cause title. OF THE CONSTITUTIQN ifft B^ iN.: 9 ^ HI©H(30UR-TOFC3HI-IAT1TISG»SRtt::BlhASPLtR PETITIQNER RESPON0ENTS WRITPETn'IONN'0.405rfl3F;2Q03 Arjunlal Kedja Versus ..StateofChhattisgarh&Qthers ^ Qowri (WritPe!titi&nunderArticle:226/2276f^^ ,, :Single Berich: :Hon'b|e Shri .Satish ;K. Agnihotri, J. • ;Present:-,^:ShriVikraiftDixit,;Adyocateforthe petitioner,'- •-'..^hri M.P.S.,Bhatia, Dy,GQvt.;AdvQcatefortheState.^ ORDERtORAL.) (PassedQhthis^8th;day6f'October;201&): 1: Learned Gounsel appearirig for the petitioner si.ibmits that th^ .: period of externment has aiready come to an end,; because.the ;:;'sa^e.wasfQF;aperrodpfthi^morrthsfrom^hedate^^<^ Qf1:Mie'irnpugHed6rEieKi.e; 27-11-2D03, ffiusnothjngre^ :i?f...:.;.':". -.:: .'•:-'" ••••••-.:.:•••':.. •:''-".: ..••:." ^his petition^ {off:'adjyyiGation'aRclAth^ jnfrLrc^ 'has'noobjecticin,.,,:,- , ' ,; - : • 2: )n view pf foregbing, ttie writ petition is dismissecl as havjng : . • become infruetuQus. •Consequeritly, interim order passect .^earlier, ifany, standsvacafed. , , • r Satish K. Agnihoti.i Judge