IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE : PRESENT : THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE: T. CH. SURYA RAO CRPM.P. No. 4389 OF 2005 IN C.R.P. NO. 1957 OF 2005 Between: 1. M. Raghunath Prasad. 2. Chandra Bhushan. Petitioners (Petitioners in CRP No. 1957 of 2005 on the file of the High Court) AND B.Ramesh S/O Bansilal, R/O 5-9-950, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad. Respondent (Respondent in –do-) Petition under Section 148 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and affidavit filed herein in support thereof the High Court may be pleased to extend time of 6 days from 20-6-2005 to 25-6-2005 for compliance of order dated 25-4-2005 in CRPMP. No. 2625 of 2005 in CRP. No. 1957 of 2005. CRPMP.NO. 2625 OF 2005: Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and affidavit filed herein in support thereof the High Court may be pleased to pass an order staying the order dated 24-2-2005 in R.A. No. 81 of 2000 passed by the Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad, pending disposal of the CRP. No. 1957 of 2005 presented to the High Court to revise the order of the Court of the Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad, and made in R.A. No. 81 of 2000, dated 24-02-2005 preferred against the order of the Court of the Additional Rent Controller, Secunderabad, and passed in RC. NO. 311 of 1997, dated 12-01-2000. The petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed herein in support thereof the order of the High Court dated 25-04-2005 and made in CRP. No. 1957 of 2005 and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. Bankatlal Mandhani, Advocate for the petitioners and of Mr. P. Gangi Rami Reddy, Advocate on behalf of the Respondent, the Court made the following ORDER : “Heard both the learned counsel. It is represented by the learned counsel for petitioners that the amount as directed by this Court by its order dated 25-04-2005, was indeed deposited, but there has been a delay of five days in depositing the said amount and thereby not complying with the orders of this Court and the time shall have to be enlarged and the delay shall have to be condoned. Having regard to the fact that the amount has been deposited it is expedient in the interest of justice to consider the request of the petitioners. Therefore, the petition is ordered.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad. 2. The Additional Rent Controller, Secunderabad. 3. B.Ramesh S/O Bansilal, R/O 5-9-950, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad. 4. One spare copy. BV HIGH COURT CYS J DATE: 29-12-2004 POST ON 27-1-2005 ORDER CMP.NO. 12096 OF 2004 IN CMSA.NO. 695 OF 2004 INTERIM STAY & NOTICE HIGH COURT DRAFTED BY CHR DATED:30-12-2004 CYS J DATE: 29-12-2004 POST ON 27-1-2005 ORDER CMP.NO. 12096 OF 2004 IN CMSA.NO. 695 OF 2004 INTERIM STAY & NOTICE