IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 553 of 2009 Between: 1 G.Yella Reddy S/o.Late G.Ramachandra Reddy R/o.Venkatagiri Village, Kodumuru Mandal, Kurnool District. 2 G.Hanumantha Reddy S/o.Late G.Ramachandra Reddy R/o.Venkatagiri Village, Kodumuru Mandal, Kurnool District. 3 G.Sivarami Reddy S/o.Late G.Ramachandra Reddy R/o.Venkatagiri Village, Kodumuru Mandal, Kurnool District. 4 G.Krishna Reddy S/o.Late G.Ramachandra Reddy R/o.Venkatagiri Village, Kodumuru Mandal, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONERS AND The Tahsildar/MRO, Guduru Mandal, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in declining to furnish the documents required by the petitioners to file reply to the impugned notice in Rc.No.658/2008, dated 18.12.2008., and proceeding to pass final orders, even though the documents referred in the impugned notice are necessary for filing the suitable reply and respondent is duty bout to furnish those documents., as illegal, arbitrary, in gross violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to furnish the said documents to the petitioners forthwith; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI K. RATHANGA PANI REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Govt. Pleader for Revenue, the Court made the following: ORDER: A perusal of the notice, dated 18-12-2008, issued by the Tahsildar, Gudur Mandal, respondent herein shocks the conscious of even an ordinary person much less of a court. He has not only took liberty with the language but also felt free to do whatever he likes, without even bothering to refer to the relevant provision of law. The respondent is directed to appear before this Court on 29-01-2009, to explain as to why necessary strictures be not passed against him. There shall be interim stay of further proceedings. Post on 29-01-2009. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The Tahsildar/MRO, Guduru Mandal, Kurnool District.(BY SPEED POST) 2. 2 CCs to the G.P. for Revenue, High court of A.P.Hyd. (By SPL. MESSENGER) 3. One C.C.to Sri K. Rathangapani Reddy Advocate. (OPUC) 4. one spare copy. HIGH COURT LNR.J DATED 21-01-2009 POST ON 29-01-2009 ORDER W.P.NO. 553 OF 2009 INTERIM STAY Bsr Dt. 21-1-2009 HIGH COURT LNR.J DATED 21-01-2009 POST ON 29-01-2009 ORDER W.P.NO. 553 OF 2009 INTERIM STAY