1 appa1487.10 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1487 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.340 OF 2008 Karim Safiullah Khan. ....Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ....Respondent. Ms. N.M.Baig, advocate for applicant. Mr. J.P.Yagnik, APP for State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED:- DECEMBER 14, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Applicant and learned APP. Considering the overwhelming evidence which has been accepted by the trial Court and that being a possible view, we have no hesitation in taking the view that this is not a fit case for grant of bail. In as much as there is evidence of last seen together. Besides, there is evidence about extra judicial confession, as also regarding recovery of incriminatory articles at the instance of the applicant/accused. Hence, application is rejected. 2 appa1487.10 2. At this stage, Counsel for the applicant submits that in that case, hearing of the appeal be expedited. It will be open to the Appellant to file private paper book, if so advised. If the appeal is ready in all respects, the same be processed under caption “convicts in jail” which in itself is an expedited category of case as per present assignment. Printing of paper book is dispensed with. (A.P.BHANGALE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)