IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 27TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 6TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 CRP.No. 52 of 2000(I) AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31/08/1999 IN IA.1566&1567/1996 IN AS.14/1995 of SUB COURT,NEYYATTINKARA REVN. PETITIONERS: PETITIONERS: 1. A.ANPAI, AYIROORKULANGARA MELETHATTU PUTHEN VEEDU, KARUMANOOR DESOM, PALUKAL VILLAGE, FROM KANATHUKONAM, CHARIVUVILA VIJAYAVILASOM ROADARIKATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, THEVIYODE DESOM, EDAKKODE VILLAGE. 2. APPALOSE SASI, AGED 38, A.R.HOUSE, MARUTHATHOOR DESOM, NEYYATTINKARA VILLAGE FROM THE AFORESAID VIJAYAVILASOM ROADARIKATHU PUTHEN VEEDU, THEVIYODE DESOM, EDAKKODE VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH RESPONDENTS: CR.PETITIONERS: APPELLANTS 1 TO 7 AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4: PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANTS: 1. SNEHAPPU JOICE, NARANGOTTUKONAM PUTHEN VEEDU, FROM NJARAKKATTU KUDIYIRIPPU PUTHEN VEEDU, MARANALLOOR DESOM, MARANALLOOR VILLAGE. 2. ANNAMMA HEPSI BAI, MATHOORKONAM, THUNDUVILAKOM PURAYIDOM, MATHOORKONAM, ARUMANA DESOM, ARUMANA VILLAGE. 3. E.LOPEZ OF -DO- -DO- 4. ANNAMMA KAMALAM OF -DO- -DO- 5. ANPAI BABY OF -DO- -DO- 6. APPALOSE MANI, KANATHUKONAM CHARIVUVILA VIJAYAVILASOM ROADARIKU PUTHEN VEEDU, DEVIYODE DESOM, EDAKKODE VILLAGE. 7. APPALOSE RAJU, OF -DO- -DO- 8. ANNAMUTHU NESAMMA, KIZHAKKE KUDIYIRIPPU PUTHUVEL PURAYIDOM, RUSSELPURAM, MARANALLOOR DESOM, MARANALLOOR VILLAGE. 9. APPALOSE, OF -DO- -DO- 10. LEYAL METTAI BAI, RUSSELPURAM KUDIYIRIPPU PURAYIDOM OF -DO- -DO- 11. YONA NADAR THOMSON NADAR OF -DO- -DO- THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.M.P.NO.95/2000 IN C.R.P.NO.52/2000 DISMISSED 27/11/2007 SD/- K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE //TRUE COPY// AHZ/ K.T.SANKARAN, J. -------------------------------------------- C.R.P. NO. 52 OF 2000 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of November, 2007 O R D E R The Civil Revision Petition was admitted on 18.2.2000. No process was filed till now. Seven years lapsed. Today, when the case is called in the defect list, there is no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/ K.T.SANKARAN, J. ---------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- C.R.P.NO. 52 OF 2000 O R D E R 27th November, 2007 ----------------------------------------------------