—S7-3— c/^ \ ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.0(^3^ OF 2009 PETITIONER Sandeep Shrivastava, son OfShri V. K.Shrivastava, Aged about 46 years, Presently working as Upper Division Teacher, Government High School, Tahsil Para, Kondagaon, Dist.Bastar Chhattisgarh) VER S U S RESPONDENTS ^..^> 1. 'State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of School Education, ' Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2f < 3. District Education Officer, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) Block Education Officer, Block Kondagaon District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) ^" Principal, Government High School, Tahsilpara, Kondagaon, Dist. Bastar (Chhattisgarh) Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Lanjoda, Tah.Kondagaon, Dist. Bastar (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 QF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, AND QTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS: 5. .78 ' ^^ ^n^i ^T k^'i^ ^m^T^l^^W 'WH^IT »»NI<sh 'TST r<fl<4l<vt^ ^•dl-y<l<o, f®ldl-Hlj,< ^....U-£-...(;.0...1i..^..^ 200 ^IT^T TT??T (-^t^ST^) l^nw irft^ ^nt^T ^ Q3.08.2009 •W^V^^ <^f <W < A2 ^N^Rh ^w^? "^0 ft^ if^R5K ^3tRm31T^I Shri Ashish Shrivastava^ coi Shri Sumesh Bajaj, GA. for At the outset counsel for tfc present petition with liberty to fil\ No.l as according to him case of judgment of this Court in W.P.(S 5849/2006. He however submits deciding the representation of the State counsel submits that| statement before this Court whetl^ with the order passed in aforem^ntioned writ petition. However, he submits that if the petitioner Accordingly, the petition i^ liberty as aforesaid. If the petitioj It is made clear that this merits of the case and the authoril representation of the petitioner str^ ^insel for the petitioner. Ithe State. |e petitioner wants to withdraw the ^ representation before respondent 1 the petitioner is covered with the ^) Nos. 5862/2006, 5871/2006 SB that direction may be issued for t)etitioner so made expeditiously. |at this stage he can not make any [er case of the petitioner is covered makes a representation to the concemed respondenty the sar|ie shall be decided strictly in accordance with law. dismissed as withdrawn with the aer makes a representation to the concemed respondent within a p4'iod of one month from the date of receipt of copy ofthis order, the sgjme is expected to be decided within a further period of two months froijn the date of its receipt. -J7?. Court has not commented on the lies concemed are free to decide the ictly in accordance with law. Sd/- pritinkerDiwaker judge ^ /