IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26966 of 2008 Between: Sakumalla Venkateswarlu, S/o. Venkata Ramadasu, D.No. 8-21-20/2A, Poollavari Street, Gandhinagar, Kakinada, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District, Kakinada. 3 The Circle Inspector of Police, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 4 The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Kakinada. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. B.SRIRAM KARTIK FOR MR.N.V.ANANTHA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents:AGP FOR HOME ORDER: In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents are not acting upon the petitioner’s complaints, dated 12.04.2008 and 19.05.2008 and also the private complaint filed by him before the learned V Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kakinada. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that on 12.12.2008, Crime No.145 of 2008 was registered on the private complaint referred to the police by the jurisdictional Magistrate. In view of this fact, which is not controverted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.No.35322 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 3rd JUNE, 2009. kvni