IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2009 / 19TH JYAISHTA 1931 RP.No. 452 of 2009(W) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.10621/2009 Dated 06/04/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): 1ST RESPONDENT IN THE WPC: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- THE SENIOR MANAGER, THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, KANNUR BRANCH, R.M. APARTMENTS, SOUTH BAZAR, TALAP, KANNUR-670 002. BY ADV. MR.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS IN THE WPC: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VAYAKKARA PATANAKKOT MADHUSOODANAN NAMBIAR, S/O.LAKSHMI @ MADHAVI AMMA, AGED 76 YEARS, THILLANKERI AMSOM, DESOM, P.O. THILLANKERI, THALASSERI TALUK. 2. V.P.NARAYANA DAS @ VAYAKKARA PATANNAKKOT NARAYANAN NAMBIAR, S/O.LAKSHMI @ MADHAVI AMMA, AGED 72 YEARS, THILLANKERI AMSOM, DESOM, P.O.THILLANKERI, THALASSERI TALUK. R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR. K.V.PAVITHRAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/06/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P.452/2009 in W.P.(C).10621/2009-W = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 9th day of June, 2009. O R D E R Heard. This review petition is filed by the first respondent in the writ petition essentially on the premises that it feels tied down to the statement in the judgment, "the entire amounts due, which will come to Rs.2,35,000/- plus interest". The said observation in the judgment is not a finding at all. All that has been recorded is the statement on behalf of the petitioners as stated in the writ petition that they give up all other contentions and that the entire amounts due would be paid. It was the statement of the petitioners in the writ petition that the amount is Rs.2,35,000/- plus interest. The said statement in the judgment sought to be RP452/09 -: 2 :- reviewed does not conclude the bank from recovering the entire amount that is due and insisting on payment of the entire amounts notwithstanding such statement in the judgment. It is so clarified. The review petition is ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/100609