IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.182 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:19.09.2011 Kamla Devi & others ....Petitioners Versus Shri Jainendra Gurukul, Panchkula ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Sanjeev Pandit, Advocate for the peititioners. Mr. Vivek Puri, Advocate for the respondent. * * * RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent-landlord has stated that the possession of the demised premises has already been taken by the respondent-landlord. This fact could not be disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners. In this view of the matter, the instant revision petition which has been filed for challenging the impugned order of eviction only, is dismissed, as having been become infructuous. September 19, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE