1 Cri.Appln.No.2428/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2428/2010 1) Smt. Khamar Sultana w/o Abdul Karim, Al-Amshan, Age-55 Yrs., occu. Household, R/o Chaitanyanagar, Nanded, Tq. and Dist. Nanded. 2) Abdul Karim s/o Abdul Rahim Al-Amshan, Age: 65 Yrs., occupation - Pensioner, R/o Chaitanyanagar, Nanded, Tq. and Dist. Nanded. 3) Abdul Hamid s/o Abdul Karim Al-Amshan, Age: 43 Yrs. occupation - Pvt.Service, R/o Chaitanyanagar, Nanded. 4) Abdul Aziz s/o Abdul Karim Al-Amshan, Age: 25 Yrs., Occupation - Business, R/o Chaitanyanagar, Nanded. 2 Cri.Appln.No.2428/2010 5) Abdul Saud s/o Abdul Karim Al-Amshan, Age: 24 Yrs., occupation - Service, R/o Chaitanyanagar, Nanded. 6) Shabana w/o Saber Chous, Age: 35 Yrs., occu. houseold, R/o Arab Galli, Nanded. 7) Fatima W/o Mubarak Age: 25 Yrs., occu. Household, R/o Hyderabad. 8) Hajra w/o Hameed, Age: 25 Yrs., occu. Household, R/o Regional Workshop, Nanded. 9) Sabha w/o Abdul Hakeem Age: 33 Yrs., occu. Household, R/o Chaitanyanagar, Nanded. 10) Kauser w/o Abdul Hameed, Age: 22 Yrs., occu. Household, R/o Labour Colony, Nanded. 11) Raufkhan s/o Muzaffarkhan Age: 51 Yrs., occu. Service, 3 Cri.Appln.No.2428/2010 R/o Nanded. = APPLICANTS VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station, Bhagyanagar, Tq. and Dist. Nanded. 2) Sow.Nikhahat Begum divorced w/o Shaikh Abdul Khave Age: 25 Yrs., occu.Household, r/o Khudbe Nagar, Degloor Naka, Nanded, Tq. and Dist. Nanded.= RESPONDENTS Mr.NK Kakade, Advocate h/for Mr.AN Kakde, Advocate for the Applicants; Mr.NR Shaikh, APP for Respondent No.1-State; Mr.DM Shinde,Adv. for Respondent No.2. ----- CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI,JJ. DATE : 18th October, 2011. ORAL JUDGMENT (PER :A.H.JOSHI,J.) 1) Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith 4 Cri.Appln.No.2428/2010 and is heard by consent. 2) The applicants are relatives of husband of Respondent No.2. 3) According to the applicants, it is evident from the record i.e. copies of correspondence and copies of representations, furnished by the husband of the Respondent No.2, that the respondent No.2 was about to file some report, which was bound to be false, and ultimately such false case is now filed, which is under challenge. 4) At this stage of the matter, the applicants' plea, that FIR is false and be quashed, cannot be accepted. The stage for considering the plea of the applicants is the trial if charge sheet is ultimately filed. 5) Therefore, the Criminal Application does not merit interference, and it is accordingly dismissed. 6) Rule is discharged. sd/- sd/- (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.H.JOSHI,J.) bdv/