Civil Writ Petition No. 5192 of 1988 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 5192 of 1988 Date of decision : 02.03.2010 Harbhajan Singh ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana and others ....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present petition is to the impugned orders dated 10.12.1985 passed by Assistant Collector, Ist Grade, Rohtak on an application of Gram Panchayat, Kherari (Annexure P-1) preferred under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 for ejectment of the petitioner from the land of Gram Panchayat measuring 7 kanals & 2 marlas situated in village Kherari, District Rohtak and the order passed in appeal dated 09.03.1987 by the Collector, Rohtak vide which the appeal was dismissed and also order dated 21.08.1987 passed by the Commissioner, Ambala Division dismissing the revision petition of the petitioner. The Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Rohtak had decreed the suit in favour of Panchayat and against the petitioner vide order dated 28.10.1986 (Annexure P-3). It was directed that Harbhajan Singh (petitioner herein) should deliver his possession over the land within thirty Civil Writ Petition No. 5192 of 1988 2 days from the publication of the order, thereafter, the petitioner be got ejected with the help of police. The appeal and revision against the said order of Assistant Collector Ist Grade have been dismissed. Aggrieved against the said orders, the petitioner has preferred the present writ petition. Nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Same was the situation on the last date of hearing. It was thus directed that counsel who was earlier representing the petitioner be informed of the next date of hearing. According to the report from the registry, notice was served on Sh. R.K. Verma, Advocate who was representing the petitioner. However, petitioner remains unrepresented despite the fact that case has been called out several times since morning. It appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing this petition. Dismissed for want of prosecution. March 02, 2010 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE