C6 V. 2. Versus Respondente 1. HJGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petjtion (S) No. 1940 of 2008 Petitloners 1. Himachal Puri Goswami, S/o Shri Govardhan Puri Goswami, Age about 56 years, Asstt. Jesshw, Govt. Prtmary SchooS, Banskata, BJock- Bagbahra, Distt.- Mahasamund (C.G.) Tiharu Ram Koshte, S/o Shri Puranik Koshte, Age about 57 yeare, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary Schooi. Durug. Block- Bilaigarh, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Education & Tribal Department, D.K.S. Bhavan. Rajpur. (C.G.) 2. District Education OfRcer, Distt. - Mahasamund/Raipur (C.G.) WRJT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTSTUTSON OF JNDSA Single Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Ajay Shrh^stava, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Smitha Gahi, PaneS Lawyer for the respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on this 1st day of April, 2008) The petitioners were appointed JnitiaJly, on a fixed pay of Rs. 100/-. The pstitioners v/ere ttiereafter, granted regular pay scate on completson of the probatjon period. The question of Jaw involved herein is, asto whether the petitioners are entitted to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. Leamed counse( appearing for the petitioners. as well as teamed counsel appearing for the respondents/State, jointly submlt that the facts and question of lav/, invoSvect in the present writ petition, are the same asto 15-€^ IKS&, ^^.^"/ y"xy -s^5^.^"' Thakur 'Z.— that of in W. P. <S) No. 3566/2007 (Loknath Patel Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others), which was altov/ed vjde order dated 27.62007. 4. Jn view of the above-stated submjssions made by teamed counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition js disposed of in $he same terms i.e. petitioners are entitted for regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of inStiaj appointment, subject to verification of the facte. No order aslo costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge 7J