IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.MANJULA CHELLUR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 14TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 23RD KARTHIKA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 1061 of 2011(S) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENT IN WPC ------------------------------------------------------- INDIRA VINOD, AGED 58 YEARS, W/O.K.P.VINOD KRISHNAN, "VATIKA", PALAPPURAM, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD 679 103. BY ADV. SMT.SUMATHY DANDAPANI, SENIOR ADVOCATE RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS 1 & 4 IN WPC --------------------------------------- 1. SHRI.AVINASH DIKSHIT, (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), COMMISSIONER, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN, 18, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, SHAHEED JEETH SINGH MARG, NEW DELHI - 110 016. 2. SHRI.N.R.MURALI, (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN, CHENNAI REGION, IIT CAMPUS, CHENNAI - 600 036. ADV. M/S.IYER & IYER, SC.KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA FOR R2 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Con.Case(C).No. 1061 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS ANNEXURE-A PHOTOCOPY OF JUDGEMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 2.12.2010 IN WPC NO.13357 OF 2010 ANNEXURE-B PHOTOCOPY OF REMINDER SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENTS ON 8.4.2011 ANNEXURE-C PHOTOCOPY OF POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER FROM 1ST RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE-D PHOTOCOPY OF POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER FROM 2ND RESPONDENT. /true copy/ PS TO JUDGE MANJULA CHELLUR, Ag.C.J & P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ---------------------------------------------- Cont.Case (C).No. 1061 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14h day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT Manjula Chellur, Ag.C.J. Learned counsel for the respondents-accused submits that direction of the court is complied with by sending order reinstating the complainant and even an intimation is sent to her. However, learned counsel for the complainant says that the party has not yet received the said reinstatement direction from the accused. Noting the submission of the learned counsel for the accused, we close the proceedings reserving liberty to the complainant to revive the same if the compliance is not done. MANJULA CHELLUR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, , JUDGE vgs