CWP 3236/2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH SB Civil Writ Petition No.3236/2010 Sunil Kumar Jaganani Versus. Kailash Chand Pansari and anr. DATE OF ORDER : 12/03/2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. SC Gupta, for petitioner. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-tenant against the order dated 29/01/2010 whereby the application filed by the petitioner-tenant under Section 21(3)(b) of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001, seeking for summoning certain documents from the respondent- landlord relating to (a) sale deed dt. 04/09/2003, (b) record of the Police report lodged by wife of the respondent-landlord dt. 02/01/2009, (c) pass book of the bank account of the respondent-landlord and (d) income tax return of the respondent-landlord, his wife and son, has been rejected by the learned Rent Control Tribunal vide order dated 29/01/2010. Counsel submits that the documents demanded by him were necessary to be summoned for arriving at the conclusion as to whether the respondent- landlord is really having any personal necessity of the premises in question and for proper appreciation the record is required to be summoned and denial thereof has certainly caused CWP 3236/2010 [2] prejudice to the petitioner-tenant. In the opinion of this Court, the submissions made are of no substance for the reason that the learned Tribunal has recorded a finding in regard to the documents sought to be summoned by the petitioner having no direct bearing on the issue which has been raised by the respondent-landlord in his suit for ejectment filed on the ground of default and personal necessity. I have gone through the order impugned passed by the learned Rent Control Tribunal and find no manifest error being committed which may call for interference. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. Raghu/p.2/ 3236CW2010final.doc