THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.7489 and 7490 of 2011 COMMON ORDER: Since the petitioner and the complainant in both the criminal petitions are one and the same, this Court heard both matters together and disposed of by this common order. Petitioner in both the applications approaches this Court by invoking the provisions under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the proceedings against him in Cr.Nos.54 and 55 of 2011 respectively of Bitragunta Police Station, Nellore District, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 352, 420, 506 and 148 read with 34 of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the contentions in both the complaints are one and the same. It is verbatim repetition of one complaint to other complaint and further submitted that the complainant claims to be the estate manager of Viswamohini Ramachandram and Basavapunna Reddy and present complaints are lodged only to defeat the civil suit pending between the 8th defendant and the petitioner herein and further submitted that only with an intent to implicate the petitioner, complainant filed these private complaints and the date mentioned in the complaints also tallied and the entire allegations are false in nature. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and perused the records. In the case registered on the basis of a complaint, the contentions mentioned in that complaint are true or false cannot be decided by this Court without placing reliance on any authentic material. The contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner are to be appreciated only by the investigation agency to find out the veracity of the complaints and the truthfulness of the allegations made against the petitioner herein. This Court cannot conduct an enquiry over the disputed facts and also regarding the motive for lodging the complaints. Hence, this Court is of the view that this is not the stage to interfere with the investigation in the present cases. The petitioner is at liberty to inform and also produce all documents, which are in his favour before the investigation officer to establish his innocence. The Investigation Officer is also directed to consider the contentions of the petitioner herein prior to completion of investigation. With the above observation, the Criminal Petitions are disposed of. If the petitioner is having any apprehension of arrest in the hands of respondent-police, he is at liberty to file anticipatory bail petition before the District and Sessions Judge and raise all the points for grant of anticipatory bail. Miscellaneous petitions filed in this Criminal Petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 26th August 2011 Rns