IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42993 of 2010 AWADHESH BIND son of Sri Prayag Bind, R.O.V Nibiya Tand, P.S Chainpur, Dist-Kaimur (Bhabua) Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 26.3.2011 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under sections 307 of the Penal Code and 25(1A) (1B), 26, 27 of the Arms Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is case and counter case with regard to the same occurrence. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no injury on any person, as it is said that petitioner fired but it did not hit anyone. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that on the other hand the petitioner had been seriously injured due to the offences committed by the other side and he had given his fardbeyan from the hospital. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no arms or ammunition has been recovered from the presence of the petitioner rather, the informant had produced a pistol before the police saying that he had snatched it from the petitioner when he was firing Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within fifteen days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the petitioner, namely, Awdhesh Bind, is 2 directed to be enlarged on bail on executing bail bond of Rs. 10,000.00(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhabua(Kaimur) in Chainpur P.S. Case No. 66 of 2010(G.R. No. 865 of 2010) subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Prakash (S.N.Hussain, J.)