THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA W.P.No. 17538 of 2006 Date:23-08-2006 Between: T.Narasimha Reddy Petitioner And The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, rep. by its Commissioner. Respondent THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA W.P.No. 17538 of 2006 ORDER: 1. The matter is coming up for admission. Ms. Jyothi Kiran takes notice on behalf of the respondents. Sri Prabhakar Reddy, learned counsel representing the petitioner would submit that the action of the respondent in not laying the cement road in the entire municipal lane cannot be justified in the facts and circumstances of the case. The learned counsel also drawn the attention of this court to the representation dated 14-08-2006 in this regard and the other correspondence in relation thereto. Several factual details had been narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition in Paragraphs 2 to 7. The representation dated 14.8.2006 and also another representation dated 17.8.2006 also had been referred to. 2. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the laying of the cement road in the bye lane of the public street should be in complete form not in the piece meal. These are all aspects, which may have to be considered by the respondents and to take appropriate decision in relation thereto. However, the grievance ventilated by the petitioner appears to be a genuine grievance as can be spelt out from the representations. Hence, the respondents are hereby directed to consider the representations made by the petitioner in relation to the laying of the cement road in the bye lane of the public street completely dated 14.8.2006 and 17.8.2006 and take appropriate decision in relation thereto at the earliest point of time. 3. The writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. __________ 23-08-2006 Stp