IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Appeal No. 38 of 2006 State of Uttaranchal & others. .……… Appellants Versus Smt. Jeewanti Devi & another. .………. Respondents Mr. P.C. Bisht, Brief Holder for the appellants. Mr. G.S. Negi, Advocate for respondent No. 1. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 states that the liability of disbursing family pension to respondent No. 1 has been accepted by the successor State of Uttar Pradesh. He also states that in furtherance of the order passed by this Court on 28.10.2004, while disposing of Civil Writ Petition No. 445 of 2002 (M/B), respondent No. 1 has been disbursed family pension up to 31.12.2006. Learned counsel for the appellants, i.e. State of Uttaranchal / Uttarakhand, states that in view of the factual position recorded in the foregoing paragraph on the basis of the statement made by the learned counsel representing respondent No. 1, he does not wish to press this Appeal as there is no liability of the State of Uttaranchal / Uttarakhand. In view of the above, the instant Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 07.12.2009 07.12.2009 G