(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 1006 OF 1999 Keshav Raghunath Suryawanshi, Age : 29 years, R/o. Bhokar, Occupation : Primary Teacher, Taluka : Bhokar, District : Nanded. .. Petitioner. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra. 2. The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded. 3. The President, Shri Krushna Bhagwan Shikshan Sanstha, Nanded. 4. The Head Master, Shri Krushna Bhagwan Shikshan Sanstha, Nanded. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Chincholkar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. N.B. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.1. Mr. V.S. Panpatte, Advocate, for respondent no.2. Respondent nos.3 and 4 served (Absent). ........................ (2) CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 11TH AUGUST 2010 COURT'S ORDER (Per B.R. Gavai, J.) : 1. Mr. V.S. Panpatte, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.2 / Zilla Parishad, makes a categorical statement, that the services of the petitioner have been approved with effect from 11th June 2001. It is submitted that for earlier period, services cannot be approved, as the post, on which the petitioner was working, was a non-admissible post. 2. Mr. G.N. Chincholkar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is satisfied with the approval of the services from 2001. 3. The petition is, therefore, disposed of, on the basis of the statement made by the learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.2 / Zilla Parishad. Rule is discharged. However, there shall be no order as to costs. ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp1006