1 Cri-A-2613-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2613 OF 2010 Mr. Babasaheb Dattatray Galinde ... Applicant (Orig. complainant) Vs. Mr. Santosh Vitthal Tapkire & Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Prashant Hagare,Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Abhijeet P.Kulkarni, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Ms. A.T.Javeri, APP, for the respondent No.2 - State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 24th February, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant. 2. According to the applicant/complainant, he had obtained a loan of Rs.50,000/- with interest at the rate of 10%. According to him, he had repaid amount of Rs.35,000/-, but still the respondent/accused claimed Rs.1 lakh more. He further contends that as per the agreement, the applicant was to execute a mortgage deed of his land in favour of the respondent as security for the loan,but by playing fraud, he got the sale deed executed instead of mortgage deed. The document was executed on 5.6.2008. The FIR was lodged on 1.4.2010. The 2 Cri-A-2613-10.sxw learned counsel makes a statement that the applicant has also filed a suit in respect of the said transaction. 3. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances, the Sessions Court granted anticipatory bail and that is sought to be cancelled by this application. After perusal of the FIR and looking to the nature of dispute, I do not see any reason to interfere in that order. Application stands rejected. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)