-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2291 OF 2005 Smt.Alka Viral Manek and Ors. ..Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.M.S.Mohite Advocate for Applicants Mr.S.V.Kotwal for Respondent no.1 Mr.D.P.Adsule, A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : AUGUST 19,2005 DATE : AUGUST 19,2005 DATE : AUGUST 19,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants, learned advocate for the respondent no.1-original complainant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The complainant Mr.Atul Ravinchandra Mehta is also present in person before the Court. 2. The applicants are seeking quashing of C.C.No.45/PW/2004 pending before the learned Additional C.M.M. 18th Court, Esplanade Mumbai. The said case pertains to F.I.R. No.321 of 2002 of Ghatkopar Police Station. The said case has been transferred to G.B.C.I.D. and it has been renumbered as C.R.No. 91 of 2002. The said case -2- is under Sections 406, 420, 120-B of IPC. 3. The complainant who is present in person states that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled and he does not wish to pursue his complaint. Looking to this fact and the fact that the complainant does not wish to pursue his complaint, I am of the opinion that no purpose would be achieved by continuing with the prosecution of the said case. In this view of the matter, the proceedings relating to C.C.No.45/PW/2004 pending before the learned Addl.C.M.M. 18th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai pertaining to FIR No. 91 of 2002 of G.B.C.I.D. (Old F.I.R.No.321 of 2002 of Ghatkopar Police Station) are quashed. 4. Application is disposed of. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]