IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 31ST MAY 2010 / 10TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 15488 of 2010(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHAJI.S.L. S/O. LEKSHMANAN, AGED 42 YEARS, VILLAGE EXTENSION OFFICER(VEO) GRADE-1, BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE,VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, HAVING PERMANENT RESIDENCE AT SILPA, ALAMUKKU, POOVACHAL.P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.AYYAPPAN SANKAR SRI.G.SURARSHAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, LMS COMPOUND, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER (GENERAL), COLLECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, VARKALA. 5. SANTHOSH RAVI.R., VILLAGE EXTENSION OFFICER-1, BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, PERUMKADAVILA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY G.P.SRI.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.15488 of 2010 (I) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 31st day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Village Extension Officer Gr-I, working at Block Development Office, Varkala in Thiruvananthapuram District. By Ext.P4 application, he requested for a transfer to Nemom. However, when draft list of transfer was published by Ext.P5, ignoring his request, 5th respondent was considered for transfer. He filed Ext.P6 objection and approached this Court complaining of the above. 2. Learned Government Pleader now submits that the draft list has since been finalised and that in the finalised list, the petitioner's request for transfer to Nemom has been allowed. This submission of the learned Government Pleader is recorded. Now that as the claim of the petitioner stands allowed, the petitioner will have no further grievance. The writ petition is therefore closed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg