1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.392 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3094 OF 2003 Bhupal Appa Navale .. applicant. Vs. Prakash Purushottam Nagvekar & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.A.B.Vagyani for the applicant. Mr.R.R.Salvi for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 29TH OCTOBER, 2004 DATED : 29TH OCTOBER, 2004 DATED : 29TH OCTOBER, 2004 P.C.: . Leave to amend. 2. Heard Mr.Vagyani, learned counsel for the applicant, and Mr.Salvi, learned counsel for respondent no.1. 3. Mr.Salvi, learned counsel for respondent no.1 states that respondent no.1 is in possession of the disputed premises and they do not propose to dispose of the said property. Considering the statement made by Mr.Salvi the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Civil application is disposed of. 2 2 2 (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)