IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13824 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 02, 2011 Sunita Rani ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Rajbir Sehrawat, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. Haryana Government had formulated a policy dated 29.11.2005 for engaging Guest Teachers in the Schools in the State. The petitioner claims that she was fully eligible for the post of Lecturer in Hindi and was appointed on 3.8.2006 in Government Senior Secondary School, Krishanpura, Panipat. Subsequently, a regular appointee came to join the school and petitioner was relieved on 28.2.2007. The petitioner, thus, served from 3.8.2006 to 28.2.2007 just for about six months. On 3.5.2007, she made an application for re-adjustment as a Guest Lecturer in the school. Petitioner claims that District Education Officer sent the application to the Principal of Government Senior Secondary School Asan Kalan. The petitioner went to join there, but was told that though there was a work load, but there was no sanctioned post available in the school. She was accordingly not permitted to join in that School. Subsequently, the State has formulated a policy to readjust the displaced Guest Teachers. The petitioner again made an application on 24.12.2008 for her re-adjustment. As per the petitioner, the Civil Writ Petition No.13824 of 2011 :2: District Education Officer took no action on this application. The petitioner again made an application on 5.3.2009, but petitioner still could not be adjusted. Yet another application was moved by the petitioner on 7.12.2010. This application was recommended and sent to Directorate. The Directorate, however, issued instructions to the District Education Officers to the effect that instead of adjusting themselves, the cases of the teachers to be adjusted should be sent to the Directorate. The petitioner has got the experience and claiming this she has approached this court with the grievance that she is not being adjusted. Since the petitioner has remained out of service ever since 2007 and in the meanwhile the policy has also undergone some changes and certain directions have also been issued by this court for not continuing the appointment of Guest Teachers beyond a particular time, it will not, therefore, be appropriate to interfere in this case. Dismissed. However, the petitioner, if so advised, may make a representation and respondents may consider and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. August 02, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE