IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 21473 of 2004 Between: Aruna Web Offset Printers, rep.by its Managing Partner V.Ramana Kumar, S/o late V.V.Ratnam, SRT-59, Behind RTC School, Risala, Musheerabad, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND The Joint Collector and President, Akshara Ujwala Samithi, 2-1-372, Excise Club Building, Opp.Collectorate, Karimnagar District .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or orders or direction more so a writ in the nature of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondent in not considering the petitioner's tender on the ground of non payment of SMD as per tender notice Rc.No.292/AUS/K/2004 dated 6-11-2004 as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and contrary to the government orders and consequently to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner tender for supply of material as per the tender notice Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.VASANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 21473 of 2004 O R D E R: This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner’s tender pursuant to the tender notice dated 06-11-2004 is arbitrary and illegal. Though Rule nisi was ordered on 29-11-2004, no interim orders were granted and in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, it stated that the tenders were already finalized on 19-11- 2004. Hence, the cause in the writ petition does not survive. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infrcutous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 27-11-2008 KLP