IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.01.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.23880 of 2009 C.Subbalakshmi .. Petitioner .. Vs .. 1. The Assistant Commissioner, Zone 1, Corporation of Chennai, No.266, Thiruvottriyur High Road, Chennai – 600 021. 2. The Thasildar, Fort, Tondairpet Taluk, Chennai – 600 003. 3. C.Haridoss 4. J.Kala 5. C.Mohan .. Respondents (Respondents 3 to 5 impleaded as per order of this Court dated 25.11.2009 in M.P.No.1 of 2009 in W.P.No.23880 of 2009) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.09.2009 and the respondents to take action based on the petitioner's legal notice dated 28.09.2009 on merits for name transfer of the property bearing Door No.6/191, Kaviarasu Kannadasan Nagar, Kodungaiyur, Chennai-118 in favour of the petitioner and her son C.Parameswaran. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Kannan For R-1 : Mr.Md.Ghouse For R-2 : Mr.D.Seenivasan, Additional Govt. Pleader For RR-3 to 5 : No Appearance O R D E R Heard Mr.R.Kannan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.Md.Ghouse, learned counsel appearing for the first respondent and Mr.D.Seenivasan, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the second respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 08.09.2009, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. There is no appearance on behalf of the respondents 3 to 5. The learned counsels appearing on behalf of the first and second respondents, i.e., Mr.Md.Ghouse and Mr.D.Seenivasan, learned Additional Government Pleader, have no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the first and the second respondents, the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 08.09.2009, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as well as to the respondents 3, 4 and 5, on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, not later than twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 08.09.2009, to the first respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar /True Copy/ Sub.Asst.Registrar jrl To 1. The Assistant Commissioner, Zone 1, Corporation of Chennai, No.266, Thiruvottriyur High Road, Chennai – 600 021. 2. The Thasildar, Fort, Tondairpet Taluk, Chennai – 600 003. + 1 cc to Government Pleader,SR.787 + 1 cc to Mr.R.Kannan,Advocate,SR.288 W.P.No.23880 of 2009 TS(CO) EM/12.1.10 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/