IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7152 of 2009 1. Arjun Chaudhary son of Shyam Laal Chaudhary, 2. Praveer Chaudhary son of Laxman Chaudhary, both residents of ;villalge Nagwar, P.S. Fatehpur, District Gaya, ……… ……Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…. OPP. PARTY For the Petitioners: Mr. Rajeeva Naayan, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr. C. Jawahar, A.P.P. … 2 06.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners have been made accused under sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code in Barachaty(Mohanpur) Police Station Case No. 03/2004. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 is “Nandoshi” of the deceased, whereas petitioner no. 2 is nephew of petitioner no. 1. Further submission is that allegations are general and omnibus in nature and with regard to the husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law and Devar of the deceased, a judgment of acquittal has been passed by the Fast Track Court No. II, Gaya in Sessions Trial No. 86 of 2005/292 of 2005. Further contention is that the petitioners are in jail custody since 28.11.2008. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, namely, Arjun Chaudhary and Praveer 2 Chaudhary, are directed to be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Barachaty(Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 03/2004. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)