IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 35147 of 2009 Date of decision: 22.02.2011 Karnail Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana for the respondent - State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition is rendered infructuous. Dismissed as having become infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 22.02.2011 mohan