IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17497 of 2008 SURENDRA PRASAD @ SURENDRA PRASAD GUPTA & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 9.5.08. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and also A.P.P. for the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 386 of 2007 under Sections 498(A) and 406 I.P.C. and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. According to the allegation, the marriage of the complainant was solemnized six years back. Initial period of marriage, she lived in peace and a son was born out of the wedlock. Thereafter, her husband passed away four years ago and since then family members of her husband started demanding two buffalos and she was subjected to various forms of torture and cruelty for non-fulfilment of demand and eventually she fled to her naihar. On 10.12.07, she was finally ousted from the marital home after all her personal belongings were confiscated and she had been abused and assaulted. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are falsely implicated in this case since petitioner No. 1, father-in-law had filed a Partition Suit No. 99 of 2005 which was disposed of on compromise. It has also been submitted that allegations attributed against the petitioners are general and omnibus nature. Be that as it may, submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners appears to be good ground for grant of regular bail and petitioners are so directed. In the event of regular bail being filed - 2 - in the court below, issues raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners be disposed of in accordance with law. In view of the aforesaid observations, this application be disposed of. M. Pal. (Abhijit Sinha, J.)