PETITIONERS : ^r ^o.^ ^2\f^y' y^r^ ,-' ^T\^" f^S~5^ l7L »^> ^3 ^o IN_^HE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUKE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.(s) No..<^...^:...^.../2007 ^s •«. <^'\ %\v o^" / Ram Chandra Dinkar Aged About 50 years, S/0 Shri B.R.Dinkar, R/0 Assistant Teacher,Govt. Primary School Torla, Block Patharia ,Distt Bilaspur (CG) Dev Charan Verma Aged About 48 years, S/0 Shri Balaram Verma, R/0 Asst. Teacher,Govt. Primary School, Rambod, Block Patharia, Distt Bilspur (CG) Linus Khalkho Aged About 51 years, S/0 Shri Sukra Khalkho, R/0 Asst.Teacher,Mahaveer Nagar Sriram Parisar, Distt Bilaspur (CG) State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Department Bilaspur District Bilaspur(CG) District Education Officer Bilaspur District Bilaspur(CG) The Director of Public Instruction, Pension . Bada, Raipur, (CG) ItO HI6H COURT OF CHHATTTSeARH AT BD-ASPUR W. P. (S) No. 868 of 2007 Petitioners Ram Chandra Oinkar ond o'thers Versus Kespondents State of Oihattisgarh & o-thers Singte Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Ms. Sunita Jain, Advocate for -the Petitioners. Ms. Oeqiali Pcndey, Pcawl lawyer for Ihe Stiite/re^wndents. ORDER 9'assed on this 13rt dey of February, 2007) The petitioners are working as Assistant Teachers in the govemment school. In •the course of their %rvices as Assislnnt Teachers, the petitioners have ob-tained B.T.I. Examination Certificates on their own eaqaenses before 1,3.1999. Leamed counset appearing for the petitioners submits •that the question involved, herem asto whe-thep the teachers, who obtomed B.T.I. Exnmination Certificates on their own expenses, are entitled to two advance increments. According to teamed counsel for +he petitioners, the petitioners are entitted to two advonce increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharodwoi Vs. Municipul Corponition. t)wg and anotfier (2006 Ctl) AAPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Afeinicipal Corporation, Durg and onother (Supra), came +o the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. ExiOiminort-ion Certificate on their own T^v expenses. we. covered by -the circultu' dated 24.12.98 (Annexure P/7) issued by the State Sovemment of Madhya Pradedi. 4. Leamed counsel for •the petitioners further submits that the facts and question of law involved in the presait case are squwely covered by decision of this Court in -the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corponrtion, Chyg and another (Supro), to which learned counsel c^pearin9 for +he respondents fairly concedes and agrees with the averment made by leamed CQunseI cppearing for the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is albwed m terms of -the order possed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharodwy Vs. Mtmiclpal Corporation. tHa'g and another (Supra). subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.T.I. Examinatton Certificates on their own expenses as per •fhe circutars dated 24.12.1998 & t.3.1999 ond -ftirther whether ihey howe been paid two odvance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Ag; Judge ^- Babli;