Arbp63.09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 63 OF 2009 Citifinancial Consumer Finance India Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Tabun Nanigopal Sutadhar ...Respondent. Mr. Chinmay Gupte i/by M/s. Mohit Gadkari & Co. for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 5th December, 2009. P.C.- 1 Pending the Arbitration proceedings, considering the averments made, this Court has already granted prayer clause (b) on 12th March, 2009. The Court has observed that Respondents failed to comply with the financial commitments and therefore, by interim order injuncted the Respondents not to create any third party right, title or interest in the property, that order has been in force, since then. 2 There is no response/reply from the Respondents till this date. The matter is pending before the Arbitral Tribunal, for the award. The Respondents not appeared even before the Tribunal. 3 In view of this, at this stage, the prayer clause (b), so granted shall Arbp63.09 2 serve the purpose. 4 The Petition is accordingly, allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) with liberty to the Petitioner to take out appropriate steps or petition with regard to the prayer clause (a). No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)