IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6646 of 2010 Decided on: 22nd November, 2010. Narain Singh ………Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner claims work charge status, arrears, seniority and other consequential benefits from the date he completed eight years of service. Reliance is placed on the decision of this Court dated 28th July, 2010 rendered in Rakesh Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others, CWP No. 2735 of 2010. 2. The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioner may file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the second respondent within a period of one month from today. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in the light also of the decision referred 2 to above within a period of another four months. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment referred to in this judgment while submitting the representation. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 22nd November, 2010 (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tilak/bss) Judge.