IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWPT No. 10011 of 2008 Decided on: August 23, 2011 Sanjeev Bhardwaj ..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .. Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General. __________________________________________ Surjit Singh, Judge (oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. Matter is squarely covered by a judgment, rendered by this Court in Surjit Singh Vs. State of H.P. and others (CWP(T) No.10013 of 2008) and two other matters, decided on 16.6.2001. 3. In view of the judgment rendered in the aforesaid case, Annexures A-3 and A-4 are quashed and a direction is given to the respondents to fix the pay of the petitioner, equal to the pay of Vijay Singh, his junior, as on 30.3.1998. Direction be complied with on or before 31st October, 2011. Arrears of pay, on account of re-fixation, Whet her report ers of t he l ocal papers may be al l owed t o see t he j udgment ? É2É shall be paid to the petitioner, within 15 days of the re-fixation of his pay, as aforesaid. Petition stands disposed of. August 23, 2011 (ss) (Surjit Singh), J.