1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Summary SUIT NO. 3917 OF 1990 Samir Pravin Parikh ... Plaintiff VS. M/s. Suresh Chandra Thakorlal & ors. ... Defendants Mr. A. L. Pandya i/b. Pandya Gandhi & Co., for Plaintiff . None for Defendants CORAM: D.G. KARNIK J. DATE: 29/6/2006 P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the Plaintiff. None present for the Defendants when called. The Defendants have not filed their written statement. Counsel for the Plaintiff therefore prays for a decree under Order 8 Rule 10 of C.P.C. 2. In the absence of the written statement averments made in the plaint are deemed to be admitted. The suit is a simple suit for recovery of money. The suit of the Plaintiff is therefore decreed under Order 8 Rule 10 of C.P.C., in terms of prayer clause (a). (D.G. KARNIK J.)