> ^!" BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l WRITPETITION (Cl N0. ^Z 65/2011 PETITIONER ^^. ^.'•••Q^;^ '<& . ^-«' <Y3-%^ .^ff, ^•'\' 1 ''>''' ^.il'y''' cW^s'.*••"'' '^••^'w^^'y^ 1.1 ^ ~ f «v / II '%.^:-...l.-'^^ ONDENTS Suraj Bhan Agarwal, S/o. Shri Inder Bhan Agarwal, Aged about 75 tea) years, R/o. Patthalgoan,> Lailunga, District, Raigarh(C.G.). VERSUS ,1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Nagar Panchayat, Laitunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Cotlector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA WtoiV l<-f ^SW AlR^sfrtt Deopii '3^ -^ww^, aflly'is, [°«yiiyy i|i*ini a>*<i<h ..©..^?..::..^.^' l). 200 311^1 W9K ( ^ql^lS't) TOmit :Hft!l ail^l SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohdn Shrivastava. J. 02-12-2011 Shri Saurabh Dangi and Ms\ Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Deputy <hl4f<n<ft't ~SVS^t ^f^^S Tf<i|-^l< iiaiRnaii^i Bulbui Agrawal, counsel forthe petitioner. Advocate General aiong with Shri Arun Sao, :1 ^ Govemment Advocate for the Stat Learned counsei for the parlfes submit that an order has been passed in the identicat cases arising from the ^ame area and on account of simitar notices issued by Nagar Panchayat, Lailunba, Raigarh. Not disputed. Accordingty, this writ petiti|3n is aiso disposed off on the same terms. However, the Nagar Panchayat wfll not take any action wtthout affording proper opportunity of hearing to the pers^n concerned. The Nagar Panchayat may also decide the question of authorizec| dispute, before passing the ordej concerned. or unauthorized structure, as the same is in , after considering the cases of the persons ManindraMohanSteivastava Judge WSI&V <Wtl 1<"llri«, -l''»140—i/20II—1.50,000. s H *d! 4-