IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38180 of 2010 1. SADHU YADAV 2. JAYA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- 02. 10.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the state. Petitioner no.1 is only alleged for abusing to humiliate in name of informant’s caste that also accordingly to the learned counsel for petitioners has been falsely leveled due to cause that the act of the informant about grazing petitioner’s crop by her she-goat was opposed, may be a good defence, but can be considered in regular side only. Accordingly, prayer of petitioner no.1 for anticipatory bail stands rejected as not maintainable. However, petitioner no.1 is at liberty to surrender in the court below and pray for regular bail which shall be decided on its own merit without being prejudiced by this rejection order. So far as petitioner no.2 is concerned, she is allowed anticipatory bail. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner no.2 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Chanan P.S. Case No. 32 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) 2 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)