THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.4596 of 2004 ORDER: The 1st respondent filed O.S.No.151 of 1992 in the Court of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Chittoor, against the petitioners, and respondent No.2, for the relief of perpetual injunction, in respect of the suit schedule property. Ten years thereafter, the 1st respondent filed E.P.No.397 of 2002, with a prayer to cause arrest and detention of the petitioners, on the ground that they have violated the decree of perpetual injunction. The petitioners opposed the application by filing counter. The Executing Court allowed the E.P., through order, dated 20.10.2003 and directed that the petitioners be confined in civil prison. Sri S.V.Muni Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the 1st petitioner is no more and the 2nd petitioner is an old woman of 75 years and they never tried to interfere with the possession of the suit schedule property. He contends that the E.P., is not maintainable, since it is filed 10 years after the decree was passed. Though notice was served, there is no representation on behalf of the 1st respondent. The decree in favour of the 1st respondent was of the year 1996. The 1st petitioner is no more. The 2nd petitioner is an old woman of 75 years. The 3rd petitioner is said to have been subjected to civil imprisonment. Therefore, nothing remains to be decided in this C.R.P. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners undertake not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the property of the 1st respondent. The C.R.P. is allowed insofar as the orders against the 2nd petitioner, is concerned. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dated:07.08.2009. GJ