1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 50 OF 2003 SURESH THIPMPPA SHETTY ... ... ... Appellant. (Orig.Accused No.4.) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ) (D.C.B., C.I.D.,Unit-VI, Mumbai. )... ... ... Respondent. -: ALONG WITH :- CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2003 GANESH @ ANNU SHIVARAM SHETTY ... ... ... Appellant. (Orig.Accused No.4.) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ) (D.C.B., C.I.D.,Unit-VI, Mumbai. )... ... ... Respondent. -: ALONG WITH :- CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 496 OF 2003 The State of Maharashtra. ... ... Applicants. (Orig.Complainants) Versus 2 1) Lalit Kumar Somdutta Nagpal 2) Parasnath Ramdulu Singh, 3) Vinod Kumar Tilakraj Singh, 4) Anil Kumar Somdutta Nagpal .. ... Respondents. (Orig.Accused Nos.1,5 to 7) -: ALONG WITH :- CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 522 OF 2003 MR. SADASHIV SEENA SALIAN... ... Appellant. (Orig.Accused No.2) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA....... ... Respondent. Mr.Khan Abdul Wahab for Appellant in Cri.Appeal No.522/03. Mr. I. P. Bagaria for Respondent Nos.1 and 4 in Appeal No.496/03. Mr. Amin Solkar i/by Mr. Y.Khan for Respondent No.7 in Appeal No. 522/03. Mr. R. M. Agarwal and Mr. Jagdish Shetty for Accused Nos.5 & 6 in Appeal No. 496/03 and for Accused Nos.3 & 4 in Appeal No.522/03. Mr. P. S. Hingorani, APP for the State. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 5TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P. C. : For the reasons separately recorded in the judgment, the Criminal Appeal Nos. 522 of 2003, 86 of 2003 and 50 of 2003 filed by the accused are dismissed 3 whereas the Criminal Appeal No. 496 of 2003 filed by the State is also dismissed. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)