1 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5077 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. M.S. Singh for the applicant. Mr. A.S. Shitole, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 23RD NOVEMBER 2009 P.C. : 1. By this application, the applicant prays that the two sentences imposed on him by two different courts be ordered to run concurrently. 2. The learned A.P.P. for the State strongly opposes the request. He points out that the applicant-accused has been convicted in respect of two different offences by different courts, one was tried by the Magistrate and another 2 was tried by the Sessions Court. Both the offences were not in any manner connected with each other, but were committed at different times and against different victims. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant was unable to point out any provision of law where in such circumstances the sentences can be ordered to run concurrently. Hence, the application is rejected. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)