IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 04.02.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.657 of 2010 & M.P.No.1 of 2010 K.M.Jambu ... Petitioner Versus 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep.by its Secretary to Government Rural Development Department Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009 2.The District Collector (Inspector of Panchayats) Coimbatore District Coimbatore .. Respondents Prayer: This petition has been filed seeking for a writ of certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the Letter bearing No.23617/para4/2009-1 dated 19.11.2009 of the first respondent herein and quash the same and consequently restore the petitioner as Panchayat President of Katampatti Village Panchayat. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Suthakar For Respondents : Mr.R.Murali (R1 & R2) Government Advocate O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has stated that he had been elected as the President of Katampatti Village Panchayat in the year, 2001 and as such he has been discharging his duties and responsibilities with the satisfaction of the persons concerned and as per the provisions of law. While so, the second respondent has passed an order, dated 09.03.2009, removing the petitioner from the post of the President of the Katampatti Village Panchayat, based on the certain allegations levelled against him, inspite of the majority of the council passing resolution in favour of the petitioner. Thereafter, based on the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ order, dated 05.10.2009, passed by this Court in W.A.No.1429 of 2009, the petitioner had preferred a revision before the first respondent. The first respondent by the impugned proceedings, dated 19.11.2009, had remitted the matter back to the second respondent to give the petitioner an opportunity of hearing and to pass orders thereon. However, the impugned order of the second respondent had not been set aside . In such cirucmstances, the petitioner has preferred the present Writ Petition before this Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents had placed before this Court a Government Order vide G.O.(P)No.23 dated 20.01.2010. According to the said Government Order, the proceedings of the second respondent, dated 09.03.2009, has been set aside and therefore, no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition. 4.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has not refuted the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondents. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, this Writ Petition stands closed, since no further orders are necessary. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Asst. Registrar //true copy// Sub Asst.Registrar arr To 1.The Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu Rural Development Department Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009 2.The District Collector (Inspector of Panchayats) Coimbatore District Coimbatore 1 cc to Mr.V.Suthakar, Advocate, Sr.No.7126 1 cc to Government Pleader, Sr.No.7327 W.P.No.657 of 2010 MDR {CO} TP/24.2.2010. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/