-^i^ <-? ^ iiiiJi Pelitjonej' Respondenls H18H COURTOF GHHATnSQARHs BILASPUR Writ l^tition (S»No. 1884 of2008 Ashok Kumar Pandey, son of Shri V'rtinu Prasad Pandey, aged about 48 years, occupation service, resident of Ramanujnagar, Dlstrict Surguja (CG). Versus 1. Sfate of ChhatUsgarti thiwgh the Secretary, Department of Health and Famfly Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Collector, AmNkapur, District Surgu^t (CG)- 3. The Chief Medteal and Health Offieer, Ambitapur,DisbjctSutguja(CG) 4. The Block Medical Offlcer, Suiajpxir, Di^rict Surguja^(CG). 5. M.R. Pakwasa, son of not tawwn, Di^ser, Communlty Heatth Cenfre, Kette, Tahslt Ramanujnagar, DistrictSurguja (GG). ',. (Writ Retition under Article 226 of the Constihidon of Indla) SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihottn, •I. Present; Mr. ^hokKumarShukla, AdVocate fortfie ptWoner. Mr. Y.S. Thakur, DeputyAdvocate Genarat vrith Ms. Suntta Jain, Panel Lawyer forthe State. ORALOR0ER (Passed on ttis 26ulday6fMar^i 2009) L^med counsel ap|»aringfer the peiUBoner submfts that the petitioner d<»s notwant to cont^t this matter on merit at this stage. However, representations dated 10-12-2008 (Annexure P^ and 22-1-2IX®(Annexure P/6) pending t»fore the respondenf autharities may be direeted to be considered and dfflsidect, in accordance with law. 2) Mr.Y.S. Thakur, learried DeputyAdyocate Qeneral with Ms.Sunita Jain, Iramed Panel Lawyer appearing for e respondente^tato fairiy submits that the aforwaid representationsflled by the prtfipner shatl be consldered and deeided, in acconlance with lawon itsown merttwithina period offour weeks from the date of receipt of a copy cf this order. 3) In view of foregoing, according to lean»d counsel appearing for the pedtioner, nothing survives for adjudication in this peUtion. 4) Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of. Gonsequently, I.A.No.1 also stands disposed of. ^' Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ^^^^^^^^ 3^^^ 3 S^^''