HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.9851 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.02.2011 **** Smt. Hardev Kaur & Anr. . . . . Petitioners VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. SS Toor, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG Punjab Ms. Aarti Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.5 ***** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioners seek a mandamus to direct the State of Punjab and its police authorities “to take immediate steps to stop the misdeeds, forgeries” allegedly being committed by respondent No.5 in conspiracy with others as it may “result into another murder in the institute……..”. (2). Suffice it to observe that the entire controversy pertains to the Management of affairs of respondent No.4 - Education Trust which runs more than one College. It is not in dispute that the husband of respondent No.5, against whom the allegations have been made, was murdered and petitioner No.2 is one of the accused who CWP No.9851 of 2008.doc - 2 – has been convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. Petitioner No.1 is the wife of petitioner No.2. (3). As there are several seriously disputed question of facts raised in this writ petition, most of which are already said to have been decided in favour of respondent NO.5, I am of the considered view that the desired writ cannot be issued by this Court in exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction. The petitioners shall be at liberty to approach the appropriate forum, if any, for the redressal of their grievances. (4). Dismissed with liberty afore-mentioned. (5). Dasti . 02.02.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge