'C^- le^^~ SINGLE 3EKCK IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHTTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.PfSl No...^g.^.../2010 PETITIONER: / Dr. M.F. Qureshi Aged about 52 years, ^ Y-^' S/o Shri Mohammad Habib •<^V\\A'S Qureshi, R/o- L.LG- 120, Dindayal Colony, Behind T.C.L. .'^^y^ College, Janjgir, ^^•" District-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) y.%::^u' ^ RESPONDENTS: VERSUS 1. ^ —^ y^'^-j^ 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Technical-Education, Manpower, Science and Technical Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Director Directorate ofTechnical Education, Baran Bazaar, Raipur (C.G.) // 3. Under Secretary Technical-Education, Manpower, Science and Technical Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND -^. .*?.yw<»^....SuA» Sffl;wdi5'-.5;ai.^2^ ^^»-.^^^^.,^S..!^&^^^ ^. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PET1TIONER RE8PONDENTS WRITPETmON fS) No. 3886 of2010 ! Dr. M.F.Qureshi. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CON8TITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Ue ShrilSatish K. Agmjhotri.J, Present: Shri Mateen Siddique^ Advocate fbrthe petitioner. Sfari A.V.Shridhar, PaiielLawyer fbrthe State^respondents. ORDERrORAD (Passed on 28th day ofApril, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner submits that tlie impugned transfer order dat€dl5.07.2010(Aimexure P/l) has already been cancelled vide order dated 27.10.2010 (Annexure R/l). Thus, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. 2. Leamed counsel appearing fpr other side does not controvert fhe above submission. 3. In view ofthe above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infinctuous. Interim reliefgrairted earlier stands vacated. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge Aniit :::;;.1^1