> •1' J 06. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP(C)No.9207/2008. M/sJayaswals Neco Ltd. Through Petitioner Mr. Devashish Bharuka, Adv. Versus State of Maharashtra &Ors. .... Respondents Through : Ms. Shubhangi Tuli, Adv. for respondent no.l. Proxy counsel for Ms. Anajana Gosain, Adv. for respondents no.3 and 5. CORAM; HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI ORDER 06.11.2008 WP(C)No.9207/2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this writ petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. November 06, 2008 'nnsr' -JT. G.S. SISTANI, J. Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified A J sV % 10.12.2008 Present: Mr.Sanjiv Goal, Adv. for the petitioner Ms.Shubhangi Tuli and Mr.H.Kumar, Advs. for the respondent + CM.16817/2008 in WP(C)No.9207/2007 * Notice. Learned counsel for the non-applicant accepts notice and submits^.that he does not wish to file any reply and in fact he has ,jV no objection if the application is allowed. For the reasons stated in the application and in view of the stand taken by counsel for the non-applicant, application is allowed. Accordingly, the order dated 6.11.2008 wherein the Writ Petition is mentioned as 'WP(C)No.9207/2008' be read as "WP(C)No.9207/2007". In view of above, application stands disposed of. G.S. SISTANI, J. December 10, 2008 'ssn'