^ Slngle Bench INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 1^% OF 2011 PETITIONER €''s' RESPONDENTS ^><1^ '^- °..•" .^y ^(5^\y .••^y' *^'1 Upkar Singh S/o Late Shrinarayan Singh, aged about 40 years, R/o San t Kabir Chowk, Jute Mffl Road, Raigarh (CG). VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretaiy, Housing Board, DKS ^ Bhawan Raipur (CG). 2. The CoUector, Raigarh (CG). 3. " The Nazul Officer, Raigarh. 4. -- The Muiucipal Corporation, Raigarh, through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Raigarh (CG). 5. ^ The Executive Engineer, Housihg Board, M.P./C.G. Housing Board, O/o Housing Board, Near Chakradhar Nagar Stadiunu, Raigarh (CG). WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA Particulars of the oetitioner: As stated in the cause title. !. Particulars of the Respondents: As stated in fhe cause title. 1. PARTICULARS OF THE ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETITION IS MADE: Petition is not directed against any particiilar order but the same is against the arbitrary action on the part of the respondents. .•-^—... ^<i6. ^Si 't^^ '%1".,#' "^^s^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0.1778 OF 2011 PETITIONER UpkarSingh ^ c\ RESPONDENTS Versus The State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticles 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Presenf:- Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocates for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Meera Jaiswal, Advocate for the respondent No.4. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 5th day of July, 2011) 1. Learned counse] appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not received any instruction/notice, however, on the oral instruction, the respondent No.4 has demolished some portion ofthe land in question. 2. At this juncture, Shri Agrawal, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent No.4, fairly submits that no notice has been issued. If any demolition takes place on the part of respondent No.4, proper opportunity of hearing would be afforded to the petitioner and thereafter, if any action is required, the same would be taken in accordance with law. 3. In view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for \ the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Gowri Sd/- SattehK.Agn* 3ud&e ibotn ~)r