IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 4TH DECEMBER 2008 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 26046 of 2008(A) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------- A.S. SASIDHARAN, S/O. APPU PANICKER, AGED 49 YEARS, 'SIVALAYAM', ARIKADA MUKKU, PRAVACHAMBALAM, NEMOM P.O., TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA SRI.M.S.KALESH SRI.HARISH GOPINATH SRI.V.VINAY MENON SRI.M.AJAY (IRUMPANAM) RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, TRIVANDRUM. 2. PALLICKEL PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PALLICHAL, TRIVANDRUM. 3. A.D. MANOHARAN, KIZHAKKUVALATHARA VEEDU, WARD No.11, EDAKKODE, PALLICHAL, NEMOM, TRIVANDRUM. 4. VASANTHI KUMARI, W/O A.D. MANOHARAN, KKIZHAKKUVALATHARA VEEDU, WARD No.11, EDAKKODE, PALLICHAL, NEMOM, TRIVANDRUM. ADV. SRI.G.P.SHINOD FOR R3 & R4 SRI.RAM MOHAN.G. FOR R3 & R4 SRI.MANU V. FOR R3 & R4 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M.R. SABU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.26046/2008 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1 : COPY OF THE SALE DEED No.2241/1998. EXT. P2 : COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED BY THE PALLICHEL GRAMA PANCHAYAT. EXT. P3 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT. P4 : COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD.12.8.2008 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT. P5 : PHOTOGRAPHS PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT. P6 : PHOTOGRAPHS PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT. P7 : PHOTOGRAPHS PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // P.A. to Judge. smp S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.26046 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent – Panchayat to take further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P4 order passed by the Panchayat. 2. The learned counsel for the 4th respondent submits that Ext.P4 order has been set aside by the Tribunal. In the above circumstances, no relief can be granted to the petitioner in respect of Ext.P4 order in this writ petition. Accordingly, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner take further proceedings against the impugned orders of the Tribunal, this writ petition is closed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd