C.R.R. No.2090 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.R. No.2090 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision 18.01.2011 Lada …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI -.- Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, A.A.G., Punjab. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed against the judgment and order dated 28.05.2010 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur summoning the petitioner under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that even though the learned Additional Sessions Judge has recorded his satisfaction that there is a reasonable chance of the petitioner being convicted yet he has not at all considered the medico legal report of the injured. This fact has not been denied by Mr. Rajinder Mathur, C.R.R. No.2090 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. In this view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to set aside the order dated 28.05.2010 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur and direct the learned trial Court to pass the fresh order after considering the medico legal report. Ordered accordingly. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) January 18, 2011 JUDGE ashish