1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1278 OF 2011 The State of Maharashtra .Applicant V/s. Namdev Krishna Raskar .Respondent Mrs.V.R.Bhosale, APP, for the Applicant  State Mr.V.S.Tadke, Advocate, for the Respondent CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 9TH NOVEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board. 2. This is an application for leave to file an appeal against Judgment of acquittal rendered by the learned Judicial Magistrate F. C., Indapur. The complainant had stated that the accused had pelted a stone at the complainant and had beaten him up in presence of Madhukar Ransing and Ramdas Gosavi. Both of 2 them have turned hostile. The learned Magistrate observed that the complainant stated that on 16th September, 2005 he was examined by Doctor at 8:30 a.m. whereas the panchanama of the spot is shown to have been conducted between 8:00 a.m. to 8:45 a.m.. Since the complainant could not have been present at both the places, the learned Magistrate observed about the reliability of the complainant. She also observed that though the complainant was beaten and threatened, the evidence about this before the Court is silent on this aspect. Considering this, the learned Magistrate refused to believe the complainant whose testimony is not corroborated by any other evidence. Therefore, it cannot be said that view taken by the learned Magistrate is perverse or improbable. View taken is perfectly probable. Leave refused. Appeal dismissed. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.) 3