IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2011 / 21ST POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 244 of 2011(E) ------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------- RABEEH.B., S/O. IBRAHIM, AGED 23 YEARS, EANTHAM HOUSE, KUNHOME.P.O., KUNHOME-670731. BY ADV. SRI.ANEESH JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O., THENHIPALAM-673635. 2. CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O., PIN-673635. THENHIPALAM REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR. SC SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.244OF 2011(E) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner wanted to apply for registration as a private candidate in B.A(Economics). The last date for the submission of on line application for registration was fixed as 28.12.2010. Petitioner states that although he remitted the required fee, when he tried to submit the on line application, he was unsuccessful for the reason that the window was not opening. It is stated that as a result he could not submit an application for registration. With this complaint he has filed this writ petition praying for a direction to the respondents to accept petitioner's application form. 2. Standing counsel appearing for the University submits that the last date initially fixed on 28.12.2010 was extended till 30.12.2010. It is also stated that no candidate has so far approached the University with the complaint that he could not submit the application for the reason that the window was not opening. It is also submitted that the examination is scheduled to commence on tomorrow and that at this last moment, nothing could be done to save the petitioner. WPC.No.244/2011 :2 : 3. First of all the petitioner alone has raised the compliant that on account of the fault of the window, the on line application could not be submitted. Even if there is any substance in the complaint, for the reason that the University had extended the last date for submitting the application to 30.12.2010, petitioner could have submitted the application before that date and that also he did not do. Therefore, there is no substance or bona fide in the complaint now raised. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/