IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9880 of 2011 Kaushlendra Prasad Versus Baleshwar Prasad & Anr ----------- 2. 28.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed for quashing the order dated 21.4.2011 passed by Sub Judge-I, Biharsharif, Nalanda in Title Suit No. 52 of 2006 whereby, the learned Sub Judge rejected the petition dated 26.11.2010 filed by the petitioner for making Title Suit No. 52 of 2006 and Title Suit No. 141 of 2000 as analogous cases. From perusal of the impugned order it appears that the learned court below found that Title Suit No.52 of 2006 is a suit for declaration of title filed by the plaintiff Baleshwar Prasad who is not a party in Partition Suit No. 141 of 2000. 2 The learned court below also found that the parties are not same and the issue involved in both the suits are also different and it may cause inconvenience to the party and the Court also if the both the suits are make analogous. In view of the above finding, in my opinion it cannot be said that the learned court below acted without jurisdiction and any injustice has been caused to any of the parties. I therefore, find no merit in this writ application. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)