{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 282 OF 2010 Sultan s/o Ibrahim Tambole APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT ....... Mr.R.F.Totla, advocate for applicant Mr.N.R.Shaikh, APP for the respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 25th January 2010 PER COURT: 1. By this application, again the applicant has prayed for anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with RTC No.677/2009 though anticipatory bail is already granted by this Court to the applicant vide order dated 13.07.2009 in Criminal Application No.378/2007 as the said protection was granted to the applicant till filing of the charge sheet. 2. It appears that now the charge sheet has been filed and summons are issued to the applicant. Though the offence against the applicant is triable by the JMFC and the application, if {2} filed, has to be decided on the very same day, yet, it appears that after filing of the charge sheet, without surrendering before the learned Magistrate, the present applicant has again moved this Court for his release on anticipatory bail. It is the apprehension of the applicant that the applicant would be taken into custody by the JMFC, like that of the other accused as when they surrendered before the JMFC, they have been taken into custody by rejecting their application. 3. In the premise, without touching the merit of the matter, the application is disposed of with direction to the applicant to surrender before the JMFC, concerned and to submit an application for regular bail. Learned JMFC, is directed to decide the application, if filed, on the very same day of its presentation. The earlier protection granted to the applicant would remain in force for a period of one week from the date of presentation of application for regular bail to enable him to file appropriate proceedings before the competent court, if his application is rejected by the JMFC. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln282-10