Crl.Revision No.1753 of 2009 (O&M) Paramjit Kaur Vs. State of Punjab and others. Present: Mr.K.K.Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.U.S.Dhaliwal, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Mr.Malkeet Singh, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. * * * Ajay Tewari, J. This revision petition has been filed against the acquittal of accused for offence under Sections 346, 363, 376, 420, 120-B IPC. Learned trial Court has noticed that the conduct of the accused in trying to save his marriage shows that it is a matrimonial dispute rather than a case of rape as alleged. In my opinion, this judgment is neither patently perverse nor apparently arbitrary. In the circumstances, this revision petition is dismissed. Since I have decided the revision petition on merit, no order is required to be passed on the application for condonation of delay. ( Ajay Tewari ) Judge 28.01.2011 sd