FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CA/10490/2005 UCO BANK V/S ASARAM WITH CRA/232/2004 & CA/10492/2005 ... 1. Shri M.M.Ambhore, learned Advocate appears for the applicants/petitioners. Shri Bajaj, learned Advocate is present for respondent. 2. There is no justifiable reason for condoning the delay caused in presenting the restoration application in Civil Revision Application, presented in the year 2004. In all probabilities the petition has become infructuous. Hence the Civil Application No. 10490 of 2005 stands rejected. 3. In view of the rejection of the Civil Application seeking condonation of delay, the application seeking restoration of the matter as well as the Civil Revision Application do not survive and stand disposed of. 4. No order as to costs. Dt.18.3.2011 (R.M.BORDE, J.) akl