C-482 No. 871 of 2009 Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Ms. Pushpa Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, G.A. for respondent. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that due typographical error in the Memo of Parties and in the index District “Nainital” is wrongly typed. It should have been District “Haridwar”. She is permitted to correct the same right now. Learned G.A. for respondent fairly stated that after the order passed by this Court staying the arrest of the petitioner, property attached under Section 83 of Code of Criminal Procedure should have been released in favour of the petitioner. In view of the statements made herein above by learned G.A., impugned order dated 21.10.2009 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee is hereby set aside. Application stands allowed. Learned Magistrate is directed to pass appropriate order on the application seeking release of the property in favour of the accused- petitioner as per law. (Alok Singh, J.) 19-11-2009 Amit