IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 14th day of November, 2011 1st Bail Application No.1004 of 2011 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Mohd. Yameen S/o Mohd. Ibrahim R/o Vill. Jheevarhedi P/s Laksar Distt. Hardwar U.K. ………Applicant Versus tate of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party S Arising out of Case Crime No. 178 of 2011 Under Section 148, 149, 332, 186, 342, 353, 504, 506 I.P.C., and 7 of Criminal Law Amendment ct, Police Station- Laksar, District Hardwar. A Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State. Heard. Applicant Mohd. Yameen, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 178 of 2011, relating to offences punishable under Section 148, 149, 332, 186, 342, 353, 504, 506 I.P.C., and one punishable under Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station- Laksar, District Hardwar, has sought his release on bail. Applicant is not named in the First Information Report. No specific role has been assigned to the applicant. Co- accused Shamshad with similar role has already been directed to be released on bail. There is no injury report showing that 2 voluntarily hurt was caused to any of the Policeman. It is also pleaded that applicant has no criminal history. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this court is of the view that applicant deserves bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Mohd Yameen, be released on bail, on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hardwar. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 14.11.2011 JM