IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10459 of 2010 Decided on : 28.05.2010 Sat Pal ... Petitioner versus State of Punjab & others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT Present : Mr. S.B.Nagpal, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1) The petitioner, who is Class IV employee of the Education Department, Government of Punjab, seeks a mandamus to direct the respondents to promote him as Senior Lab Attendant/Library Restorer with effect from the date he acquired eligibility and/or the date when his juniors were promoted thereafter. (2) In this regard, the petitioner is said to have made representations to the respondents as also personally met the authorities including respondent No.3 but nothing has been heard by him so far. (3) Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought by him, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide the above mentioned claim of the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Needless to say, if the petitioner is found entitled to the consequential benefits, the same shall also be granted to him forthwith within the above stipulated period. 4. Ordered accordingly. 5. Dasti. May 28, 2010 (SURYA KANT) sonia JUDGE