IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 27TH AUGUST 2010 / 5TH BHADRA 1932 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2575 of 2010() ------------------------------ CRA.486/2009 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT,-I, MAVELIKKARA CC.117/2007 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, KAYAMKULAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): / APPELLANT / ACCUSED ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RAJI.S.PILLAI, W/O.SASIDHARAN, KOKKATTU HOUSE, (CHANDRALAYAM) KADUVINAL MURI, VALLIKKUNNAM VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL RESPONDENT(S): / RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP:BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 2. PREMIERMON P.D.@ PREMIER, S/O.DINAKARAN, DINAKAR BUNGLOW, CHIRAKKADAVAM MURI, KAYAMKULAM REP.BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER ANIRAJ K.K.,S/O.KAMALAKARAN, KAVITHA BHAVANAM, CHIRAKKADAVAM MURI,KAYAMKULAM PIN-690502 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.BENNY VARGHESE THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.S.GOPINATHAN, J. ------------------------------ Crl.R.P.No.2575 OF 2010 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of August, 2010 ORDER The Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Kayamkulam in C.C.No.117/2007, convicted the revision petitioner for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to simple imprisonment for three months. He was further ordered to pay Rs.75,000/- to the 2nd respondent as compensation under Section 357(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In appeal, while confirming the conviction, the substantive sentence was reduced to imprisonment till the rising of the court and a fine of Rs.75,000/- with default sentence. Now, this revision petition. 2. Today, when the revision petition came up for admission, the learned counsel submitted that he is seeking only time to remit the fine. The submission is recorded. The Revision petition is dismissed. Revision petitioner is granted six months time to remit the fine. The bail bond executed by the revision petitioner shall remain in force. Deposit, if any, already made shall be given credit to. P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE dmb