IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.738 of 2010 with CWPs No. 553, 554, 555, 556, 557, 662, 661, 663, 664, 665 and 666 of 2010. Decided on: 31st March, 2010. (For title, please see below) Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner(s): Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate in all the petitions. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. in all the petitions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) 1. CWP No.738 of 2010. Giri Raj Gupta. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 2. CWP No.553 of 2010. Kamal Kumar. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 3. CWP No.554 of 2010. Lok Raj. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 4. CWP No. 555 of 2010. Diksha Sharma. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 5. CWP No.556 of 2010. Devender Kumar. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 6. CWP No.557 of 2010. Anil Kumar. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 2 7. CWP No.662 of 2010. Bhupinder Singh. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 8. CWP No.661 of 2010. Kapil Gupta. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 9. CWP No.663 of 2010. Kamal Chand Bhardwaj. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 10. CWP No.664 of 2010. Manju. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 11. CWP No.665 of 2010. Ravi Gautam. Vs. State of H.P. & others. 12. CWP No.666 of 2010. Mukesh Bhargava. Vs. State of H.P. & others. The petitioners in these cases are aggrieved since according to them the training period they had spent for JBT is not counted for the service benefits. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that all the petitioners will represent their grievances before the Government and at this stage, this Court need not go into the merits of the cases. Therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the merits of the cases, these writ petitions are disposed of as follows: There will be a direction to the first respondent to look into the grievances of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law treating the writ petitions as representations. The needful shall be done within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition in each case. In case the 3 petitioners seek for an opportunity of hearing, the same shall also be granted. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 31, 2010. (Justice R.B. Misra), (tr/ks) Judge.