HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BELASPUR DEVISEON BENCH WRtT APPEL UNDER SECTION 2H l OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT {APPEAL TO DIVIS!ON BENCH) ACT, 2906 Present : Shri Kishore Bhaduri, learned Additional Advocate General for the Statelappellants, Shrl J.N. Nancie, learned counsel for the respondent. ORDER (18m March, 2&09; The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: Learned counsel for the parties are heard on LA. Nam/2008, an application for oondonation of d‘etay in fiting the writ agpeal. x3 i "\ Coram ' HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUFTA, C.J. & HON’BLE sHR! SUNIL KUMAR SWHA, J. Writ Appeai Ne. 243 of 2008 gpgeiiants 1. State of Chhattisgarh through its (Respandents Secretaw, Department of Labour, No.1 and 2} Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raépur (CG) 2. Directorate of Employees State Insurance Services, Ra§pur through its ln—charge Director, D- 290/5, Tagore Nagar, Raipur (_C.G.) ‘ Versus Respondent Smt. Kiran Mahaparra, Wlo Shri Petitioner Sanjay Mahapatra, aged about 32 years, presently working and posted as Aesrstant Grade-m, Directorate of Empioyees State Insurance Services‘ Raipur, R/o 472, Ne Rajendra Nagar, Janta Cotony, Raipur, District Ratpur (CG) t0 2. On due consideration, we are saiisfied that the appeiiants have succeeded in showing sufficient cause for the deiay in fiiing the appeal. 3. LA. No.01/2GO8, therefore, is ailowed and the deiay in fiiing the writ appeai is hereby condoned. 4. Learned counsei for the parties are heard on admission. 5. The appeiiants have fiied this writ appeai against the impugned order dated 11*“ August, 2908 passed in W.P.(S} No.4320/2008. 6. Respondent — Smt. Kiran Mahapatra, whowas working as Staff Nurse Assistant Grade —- iii filed the writ petition challenging the show—cause notice dated 21 .072008 (Annexure Pit in the writ petition) on the ground that the show-cause notice was vague to such an extent that the petitioner was not oapabie of fiiing repiy to the said notice. 7. Learned Singie Judge on a perusal of the show-cause nOtice impugned in the writ petition found that the show-cause notice iacked necessary detaiis and as such white quashing the show-cause notice dated 21.97.2908 granted liberty to the Department to issue fresh notice giving the detaiis of the atieged irregularity and illegality said to have been committed in the selection of the petitioner. 8. During the course of hearing, we were intormed that after passing of the impugned order dated 11.08.2008, the appeilants’ Department has issued another show-cause notice dated 23m October, 2008 to the respondent giving details of the alleged irreguiarityl iliegaiity. it was further pointed out that the respondent has already submitted her reply t9 the said show-cause notice. 9. in View of the abave—mentioned deveiopments after pessing of the impugned order dated 11082008, now nothing survives for decision in this writ appeai. The writ appeai, therefore, is rendered iniructuous. nimmi 0&3 »3,g " " writ appeal, g] sal- Sdl- e L Kumar Sinha Chief Justice S‘mii Judge Judge f