IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.954 of 2010 1. BAIDYNATH YADAV 2. SHANKAR YADAV BOTH SONS OF LATE RAGHUNANDAN YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SURHA BASANTPUR, P.S.- HASANPUR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MAHESHWAR YADAV, SON OF BHAGWAT YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SURHA BASANTPUR, P.S.- HASANPUR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR ----------- 2 07.07.2010 I.A. no. 1314 of 2010 Petitioners press the present application seeking condonation of delay. It appears that final order under Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was passed on 18.11.2003 whereby the second party (petitioners herein) were directed to execute bond for maintaining peace for a period of one year. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order, petitioner filed appeal being Cr. Appeal no. 128 of 2003 (Baidyanath Yadav & Anr versus The State of Bihar & Anr.) which was dismissed by order dated 22.2.2005. Limitation for filing the present revision application expired on 24.5.2005 whereas the same has been lodged in this Court with defect on 6.7.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has been defrauded by the counsel who was initially engaged for filing the revision application. On query, it is stated that no action against the counsel for the alleged misconduct has been taken before the Bihar State Bar Council. 2 Looking at the grounds set out in the limitation application seeking condonation of delay, this Court is not satisfied that they deserve to be accepted. The application seeking condonation of delay is, therefore, rejected. Since the application seeking condonation has already been rejected, the criminal revision application is also dismissed as barred by limitation. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )