1 cra 336-2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 336 OF 2010 Shri Kishor Shankar Purandare ...Applicant vs. Shri Balasaheb Ramdas Tikhe & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Prathmesh Bhargude i/b. Mr.Sugandh Deshmukh for the Applicant. Mr.Mandar Soman i/b. Mr.T.D. Deshmukh for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATED : OCTOBER 27, 2010 P.C. :- 1 After arguing the revision application on merits, the learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions from the applicant, states that the applicant does not desire to press the revision application on merits. He states that the applicant is present in the Court. However, he prays that a longer time to vacate till 31st December, 2012 be granted. 2 cra 336-2010 2 The learned Counsel for respondent no.1 states that reasonable time may be granted. 3 The applicant is not pressing revision application on merits and hence, decree for possession will attain finality. Moreover, the applicant has shown willingness to give usual undertaking to vacate the suit premises. Considering these aspects, time deserves to be granted to the applicant to vacate the suit premises as prayed. 4 Hence, I pass following order :- Revision Application is dismissed as not pressed. Notwithstanding the dismissal of the revision application, the decree for possession shall not be executed till 31st December, 2012 subject to condition of the applicant and all his adult members of the family filing usual undertaking in this Court to vacate the suit premises. The 3 cra 336-2010 undertakings shall be filed within a period of four weeks from today. If undertakings are not filed within the stipulated period, the decree for possession shall become forthwith executable. There will be no order as to costs. (A.S. OKA, J.)