1 Caf-4574.10 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4574 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2214 OF 2005 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri R.D. Dhanuka i/by Smt. A.R. Dhanuka for the Applicant. Ms Sumedha Rao for the Respondents. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 28TH FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. It is the contention of the Applicant that the Respondents have converted user of their premises and now they are using it for commercial activities. There is no case made out that any of the Respondents in this application ( Original Appellants in the Appeal ) have created third parties rights or have parted with possession. Hence, change of user is no ground for vacating the interim relief. If according to the Applicant, the Respondents ( Original Appellants in the Appeal ) have violated the order of status-quo, it will be open for 2 Caf-4574.10 the Applicant to take appropriate proceedings in that behalf. 2. Suffice it to say that no case is made out for vacating interim relief of stay. 3. Hence, the prayer (a) of the Application is rejected. However, as regards the allegations of breach of order of status quo passed by this Court, it will be open for the Applicant to file appropriate proceedings. (A.S.OKA, J)