IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29827 of 2010 KRITYANAND PRAKASH Versus 1. The STATE OF BIHAR 2. Smt. Arti Devi ------ 3/ 03.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is husband alleged for demand of dowry. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that at the same time petitioner is alleged for being impotent. If that is the reality then no question arises about making of any demand. Specifically, it is said that she is not adamant to remain in company of this petitioner. She is noticed by this Court also. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 710(c)of 2009 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M. Patna City subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)