IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6097 of 2010 MD. GHAFFAR @ MD. GAFFAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 26.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. According to learned counsel for the petitioners affair is there in between the victim girl and petitioner’s son Md. Mukhtar either it was love or illegal act of Md. Mukhtar but both are at present living together having no concern with this petitioner. Refusal of anticipatory bail due to being father of Md. Mukhtar is not justified. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 104 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)