IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36234 of 2011 1. Bimal Yadav. 2. Raju Yadav. 3. Pradeep Yadav. 4. Arun Prasad. 5. Sanjay Prasad. 6. Ajay Prasad. 7. Arvind Prasad. 8. Pramod Prasad. 9. Surendra Prasad. 10. Raushan Yadav. 11. Kamlesh Yadav. 12. Krishan Yadav. 13. Suraj Yadav. 14. Jugesh Prajapati. 15. Bipin Prasad. 16. Manoj Yadav. 17. Pairu Yadav. 18. Vinay Prasad and 19. Sahud Khan…………………………… Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ………………………. Opposite party. 2 9.11.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 448, 341, 323, 504, 506, 427, 307, 380, 376 and 511 of I.P.C., section 27 of Arms Act and 4(XI), (XII) of S.C. / S.T. ( Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Though the accusation against the petitioners are of assault, abusing the informant’s side calling by caste name and committing theft but it is submitted that a compromise petition has been filed to the effect that cordial relationship and good behaviour have been restored between the parties as gets reflected from Annexure-3. In view of this Court it is a fit case for grant of regular bail. Let the learned court below consider and pass appropriate order with regard to regular bail preferably on the same day if the petitioners surrender within a period of six weeks in connection with Roushanganj P.S.Case No.39 of 2011 pending in the court of the learned S.D.J.M., 2 Sherghati at Gaya. Let the order be faxed to the learned court below at the cost of the petitioners. With the above observation, the application is disposed off. AnilKrSinha ( Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)