IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 950 of 2010. Decided on: 30th March, 2010. H.P. Animal Husbandry Deptt. …Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. & ors. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General . --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: “a) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for training as veterinary Pharmacists by one time relaxing the Rules/ or in the alternative the rules may be declared ultra vires to the extent they debar the petitioner for 25% quota for veterinary Pharmacist Training Course and thereafter for appointment as Veterinary Pharmacists, as and when the posts are available. b) The petitioners are doing the additional job of Artificial Insemination; they may be given the financial benefits or the designation to the post of Artificial Inseminator of the said post, being equal pay for equal work or for additional work, which the petitioners are discharging in addition to their own duties.” It is for the petitioners to approach the Government in which case the Government would get opportunity to look into the matter and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law. The writ petition is hence disposed of as follows; 2 The petitioners may file appropriate representations before the first respondent. In the event of the petitioners filing representations within one month from today, the first respondent shall consider the same within another three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgement along with a copy of the writ petition. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 30, 2010. (Justice R.B. Misra), (tr/vs) Judge.