, '""''•(''"•'•'^^^•^•^^^~^'^':^'^•"^^''^^^^^•^''•^s^'^^^^ SN ^/®SE-_ HI8H_l,eCT»R£Jfe,©? 3@Bie&tB&^ &T J%B&I«BOR Vt^^3^ PefeAfcioaer Siat* SBrajbai w/o ManraAltaB aged ateaate S2 yearis resideBt of P*@tf B<>»50 • Tahsll Balpd Mst. Burg. Vs. ^ l* State e£ Msidbya Pradesh through •ftBBB SeeEetary, Keveaue VallaKb Bfaawan Bhopal. . Abdttl Qttreshi fTesiSmat. • . '•••'. . Ho&amaadea •Ciaitttt'&ifcee :Kssiaenfe-io£IISe>WI. '-^ •, Sist.' Bacg,'».».- WtIT geiSTXON HfHBER ARTIi@>E 226 & 227 0F TEiE GON^'ITBTXOH ©F XNDIA 3:i:i,!il —in HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. 3437/98 PETITIONER Smt. Surajbai Versus RESPONDENTS State of M.P. and another SB:- HON'BLE SHRIN.K. AGARWAL. J 0-RAL ORDER (23-2-2011) 1. Case is called twice. Even then none appears for the petitioner. 2. In the circumstances, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss fhe petition. 3. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- N.K.Agrawal Judge