1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.229/2008 Narsingh Dan and others. vs. State of Rajasthan and others. Date : 15.1.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.PS Bhati, for the petitioners. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners are aggrieved against the order dated 5.1.2008 by which the petitioners' interim prayer to maintain status quo was refused by the trial court by detailed order but without deciding the main injunction application. The contention of the petitioners is that the matter was of urgent nature and in view of the technical report, the construction sought to be raised by the State and its instrumentality may be against public interest and may be dangerous to the students. It appears from the impugned order itself that the trial court was fully conscious of this fact and, therefore, observed and expected from the defendants to file reply at the earliest. 2 In view of the above, it will be appropriate that the trial court may hear the injunction application on an early date, may it be 23.1.2008 and decide the application within this month itself and for this purpose, may fix early date for which the petitioners may submit application in the trial court by tomorrow for early hearing. Notice be served upon the remaining defendants in the injunction application as well as application for early hearing by the petitioners. In case, the notices are served, then the matter may be decided within this month and if not, then not later than 18.2.2008. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition is disposed of. Office is directed to send photostat copy of Annexure-4 of this writ petition to the District Judge, Balotra so as to point out learned District Judge, Balotra how the certified copy of the order of trial court was issued. The certified copy of the order of the trial court does not contain the title and even the date of order. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya