1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5717 OF 2002 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr. P.J.Thorat, i/b Mr R.A.Thorat, for the petitioner. Mr R.M.Hardas, for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 22/09/2009 PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is directed against the orders passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal and the Sub-Divisional Officer, Nashik, by which they remanded the matter for fresh inquiry under section 32-P(3) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act. I have perused the impugned orders. It is clear that the authorities below, after having considered overall facts and circumstances of the case and for the T 2 reasons stated in the orders, thought it fit to remand the matter to the Tahsildar & ALT, Nasik, for holding a fresh inquiry under section 32-P(3) of the B.T. & A.L.Act. Keeping the reasons stated in the impugned orders in view and considering extremely limited jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, this writ petition fails and dismissed as such. The Tahasildar and ALT, Nashik shall conduct the fresh inquiry in pursuance of the order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Nasik, dated 20.7.2000 as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) 3