IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22035 of 2010 NAVIN SINGH S/O BISHWANATH SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 27.09.2010 The petitioner was refused bail earlier by an order dated 7.1.2010 vide Cr.Misc. No. 39207 of 2009 but the prayer for bail has been renewed on account of other accused persons having been granted bail by this court. However on going through the order, I find that the order are of the year 2005 and 2008 i.e. prior to the present rejection order. Today supplementary affidavit has been filed by the petitioner which reveals that he was accused in 5 cases but in 2 of them he was acquitted and therefore, 3 cases are pending against the petitioner. Considering the same, the prayer for bail is once again rejected. In the present case Senior S.P. Patna was also to report about the antecedent of the petitioner which has been received revealing that he has no criminal antecedents. In my opinion 2 care should have been taken before sending the petitioner’s antecedent and the effort should have been made for calling for an opinion from S.P. Begusarai about his antecedent since the petitioner resides there. Let the order be sent to Senior S.P. Patna through FAX. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )