PVR 1 wp5403-10 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5403 OF 2010 Vinod Raghunath Mundekar ...Petitioner vs. 1.State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents --- Mr.Rakesh R.Bhatkar, for Petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for Respondent nos.1 & 2. Ms.Priyadharshni Birje, for Respondent nos.3 & 4. Mr.Gandhi, for Respondent no.5. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & N.D.DESHPANDE,JJ. DATED: 23rd September, 2010 P.C.: 1. By this petition, the Petitioner seeks order for cancellation of selection process of Shikshan Sevak. There are two grounds of challenge viz. (i) that the private agencies which have been appointed for holding examination have not published result, and (ii) the waiting PVR 1 wp5403-10 list of the selected candidates is not published. 2. So far as the first challenge is concerned, there is statement made in the affidavit by Respondent no.3 that the result was duly declared. A copy of letter dated 1.6.2010 issued by Respondent no.5 to the Deputy Director of Education is also placed on record, which is taken on record and marked X for identification, wherein it is stated that the list of the candidates who had appeared for the examination and who had passed the examination was published on the website on 1.6.2010. The learned Counsel appearing for Respondent no.5 also made submission to that effect. We have no reason to doubt this position. Therefore, there is no substance in the first challenged. The learned Counsel appearing for Respondent nos.3 and 4 pointed out to us that the select list is published and from that select list existing vacancies will be filled-in and the candidates who remain to be appointed will be treated as PVR 1 wp5403-10 candidates on waiting list. In this view of the matter, therefore, there is no substance in the petition. The petition is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (N.D.DESHPANDE,J.)