1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2780/2010 Mohd. Jamil Mohd. Yasin Vs. The Returning Officer, Z.P. Elections/Tahsildar, Pusad, District Yavatmal. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. K. S. Narwade, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Wasnik, AGP for the State- respondent. CORAM: B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 18TH JUNE 2010. 1] Heard Advocate Narwade for the petitioner. 2] Contention is as per the provisions of Amending Ordinance undertaking was sworn on 14/6/2010 at 2.00 p. m. and hence note made by the Returning Officer that he got the same at 6.00 p. m. in the evening is incorrect. Learned counsel states that list of validly nominated candidates is also published on 15.6.2010 which demonstrates that process of scrutiny was not over on 14.6.2010. 3] Learned AGP points out that the Returning Officer has placed remark that he has received undertaking at about 6.00 p. m. in the evening. 2 4] It is apparent that a disputed question of fact arises, which cannot be decided on the basis of inferences. Hence, with liberty to the petitioner to take further steps in the matter, Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. JUDGE Ambulkar.