1 ABA-212.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.212 OF 2011 {For Anticipatory Bail} Devchand Jayla Ahire & Ors. .... Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent S/Shri R.B. Paranjape i/b M.N. Sandhyanshiv for the Applicants. Ms R.V. Newton, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: APRIL 21, 2011 P.C: 1. This is an application for anticipatory bail by father in-law, brother in- law and the brother in-law's wife of the victim who committed suicide by consuming poison on 12-2-2011. The report was given on 24-2-2011. The victim was married to applicant No.1's son about 13-14 years ago. Her husband seems to have also suffered some imprisonment. He fell in for his cousin and therefore wanted to marry that cousin and wanted the victim to give consent for such marriage as per the FIR. The learned APP opposes the application saying that in the supplementary statement of the first 2 ABA-212.11 informant she has stated about demand of money for purchasing some agricultural land. No comment at this stage on this subsequent discovery of demand is necessary. The reason of suicide appears to be desire of the victim's husband to take another wife. It is not clear as to why the applicant should be in custody for the purpose of investigation into this crime. The application is therefore allowed. In the event of the applicants' arrest in C.R. No.I-62 of 2011 of Taluka Police Station, Malegaon, District Nashik, the applicants be released on bail on their furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs. 25,000/- per person on the condition that the applicants shall report at the police station concerned on 29-4-2011 at 11:00 a.m. and thereafter as and when required by the I.O.. The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and they shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the trial Court. 3 ABA-212.11 2. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicants may furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 3. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)