XI-HC—78 '3ST ••^wmi\, ®-al<i*is,fs<diyy *ll*lciTa>*iieb """•"""•••""—•••^•^200 StI^T'^^ (1|<<i^«l<l'El) sii^i ^ifiithF <fsff ^f^ ?R^I<ifr : fe, ^ C'KllsR flf^ct 311^1 W.P PETITIONER D.R. Tha aged ab<] Teacber, Kanlcer, 'niilciq'li l 4CTf^ff6l<il ^I-^K ^sffin aii^i t8l No.5899/2008 |rur, S/o. Late Stui Sajjaa Siugh Thakur, lut 68 yearsf retired as Upper Division Gtovt. High School, Kondagaon, Block TahsU Dist. Kaaker (CG), R/o. Anjali Niwas, (Jhuniyapara, Kanker Tahsil & Distt. Kauker(pG) |?ersus KESPQNDENTS 1. State o C'rl 11-1+-i. JUU. U.^tXLl.lj Maatray 2. Th.e C.G. through its Secretaor School T^O-«nr-iT*+-*in«=i-t~>+ 1^^/^lXL UJULL.J-Lt., r^ v c j.j^.i^,\j. f^Vt mim^-i iJSJLd.W CUJL Departaj.ent Raipur (( 3. Assista4t Developtnent Canipu^ 4. CoUectojt Departii|i Adnunistration Bhawaa, Distt. fr.ya, Raipur (CG) . pecretaiy, Gterieral Ministiy, D.K.S. CG) Commissioner, Trible Wetfare Departnient, Kauker, CoUectorate , Distt. North Baster Kanker (CG) Trible Welfare Developnient Wrlt Petition uader Arti SB: HON^SHM DH1RENDRA 22-10-2008 Shri R.S. Patel, cQunsel ShriM.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. it r^i^tTki/-t N.QrfT-i Roe+'aT' Tf'snlr?lT' tCT^. LLj i>j.i21 Lt. A</fc nVjiXl-t-I. i^<a-i3 IA-. ^., IVC^i-l-tY^/A ^<-'v-<^ le 226 of the Constitution of India MISHRA. J |for fhe petitioner. IGovt. Advocate for the State. Heard. Grievance of fhe petiti(|)n.er is that he has alicady put in inore fhaa 24 years of service u^der fhe respondents. He is enyfled for upgraded pay-scale as per | circular of the State Oovenuiient vide acmexure of P-1, dated 24.4. ^006. However, the benefits ta pursuance iliH1 s ss i!*fl 118 B1 ^•ig?^^ — '^i3;?s'°~<l 3 [-HC—78 311^1 W R-f WT SII^I *1 f-- s 'ysr '<ii<4i<i'4, ©Tily're,fs(diyy,< tnNMl vhwvh •^200 sn^i '^v (i^it^«i<'E[) i^iiw ^itei sn^i z ofAnnexure P-1 have notbeeu representations in this regard. Leanied counsel for the rtf his petition at this stage. Hoi representation against his further prays for direction representation aud decide fhe iu fhe matter of 'Ariun Stagh decided oa 15*h Januaiy 2008 Learaed counsel for fhe $1 files representation for his grie^ 1 Si, 2, fhe same shall be accordance with law laid (supra). In view of the aforesaidl parties, the iastaat petition is to file fresh representatiou, raised iu this petition and on shall decide the saiiie~afiter accordaace with law laid dowtn (supra), expeditiously, preferat|ly the date of receipt pf represent4.tion Certified copy as per rule|s. dowla cf>l<i[tr1^'1 tff<i<ni "^f fssi) <F>|^|< ^TatRpTsii^r ;xtended to fhe petitioner despite several tetitioner submits that he is uot pressuig i|fever, he prays for Uberty to ffle fresh gtievauces before the respondents and |to ftie respondents to consider his ^auie expeditiously as per law laid down 'I]hahur Vs.State Govt. of Chhattis^u-h' .W.P.(S) No.5995/66. ^tate submits fliat iai case, the petitioner rances afiiesh before fhe respondents No. considered after verification aad iu iu the uiatter of Arjun Singh Thakur dtlv raipuig slich submissions of leaaed counsel for fhe Idisposed ofwith liberty to the petitioner aU his grievances, which have been representation being raade, the State due verification on its own. nierits in in the inatter of Arfun Singh Thakur wifhm a period of fhree nionths from. "Sd/-. DMrenaraMishra Judge