IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTYFIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT APPEAL No.1293 of 2002 Between: Md.Abdul Khaleel, .... Appellant/Petitioner AND The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Mahabubnagar District and another. ....Respondents/Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT APPEAL No.1293 of 2002 JUDGMENT : (PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO) This appeal is filed by the unsuccessful writ petitioner, who is aggrieved by the orders passed by the learned Single Judge disposing of the writ petition filed by him, wherein he sought for Mandamus to implement the order dated 10.06.1997 passed by this Court in W.P. No.5194 of 1992. Heard both sides. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, the learned Single Judge directed the 1st respondent to dispose of P.W.Case No.16 of 1989 including the application filed by the 2nd respondent to set aside the exparte order dated 25.11.1989, wherein the 1st respondent said to have directed the 2nd respondent to pay a compensation of Rs.25,240/- towards wages to the appellant, however, observing that in the event the said case is already disposed of, as directed earlier (W.P. No.5194 of 1992, dated 10.06.1997), it is open to the 1st respondent to pass necessary orders for payment of wages. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and having perused the material available on record, we are of the view that no interference is warranted with the innocuous order passed by the learned Single Judge, as no grounds are made out on which the appellant can assail the impugned order on merits successfully. We, therefore, see no merits in the appeal and accordingly dismissed. No costs. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J _________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J AUGUST 25, 2009 KSH