XI-HC—78 3TT^T ^T f^r<i<=h TT^TT 3TR'?T 5b^l<^ f Soma 3^cT?3rpn^r, ^Tfl'Mli<o, fsi<7'»i^^< __.^..<-.......r<p../...<>.T. ^Mv\\ *MI<b "^ 200 3^?T Tra^ ( <i<s<f^<i?T) '^TTW^ft^T ^T^T APPLICANT: RESPONDENTS: 2. {Application for restor^tion ofthe Arbitration Appeal) Division Bench: Hon'ble Mr. L.C. Bhadooand Hon'ble Mr. Sunil Kumar Sinha. 30^-2008 Mr. Anand Kumar Tiwari, coi Heard. Learned counse! for the adl called at 10.15 a.m. on 24-1-2008, in the city. The reason given by counse| are of the opinion that it is a fit application is allowed and the arbiti|ation original number. ^opy of this order be placed Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge cbl^fd^l'1 TTFRTf ^f.fe^t <r3l<SrK '^ 3rRp 3?n^i Cailash Chandra Agrawal, Aged about >2 years, Occupation Contractor, R/o ^illage Lakhanpur, Djstt. Surguja 1G.) Versus - 3outh Eastern "hrough: Coalfields Ltd. ;hairman-cum-Managing Director, .E.C.L. Seepat Road, Bilaspur (C.G.) ;hief General Manager, S.E.C.L. ishrampur Area, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) |nsel for the appiicant. jpiicant submits that when the matter was |ie could not appear on account of trafflc jam for the applicant is sufficient, therefore, we > to allow this application. Accordingly, the appeai is directed to be restored to ite n the record ofthe sgiid arbitration appea!. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge