CWP No.8523 of 1990 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8523 of 1990 Date of Decision: 29.04.2010 M/s Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Toansa, Roper ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents 1.Whether Reporter of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment- Yes/No. 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not- Yes/No. 3.Whether judgment should be reported in the digest-Yes/No. Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh Present: Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jaswinder Singh, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Sandeep-Respondent No.2 in person. Mr. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) 1. By way of present petition, petitioner is challenging the reference order dated 21.12.1989. Now it is well settled position of law that instead of challenging the reference order on the ground that services were rightly terminated, employer can take all the pleas available under the law before the Labour Court. 2. I have perused the reference order, I find no illegality or jurisdictional error in the reference order. I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition challenging the reference order. 3. Writ petition is devoid of merit, hence, is dismissed. CWP No.8523 of 1990 4. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to take all the pleas before the Labour Court, if so advised. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE 29.04.2010 sharmila