IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 434 of 2003 (M/B) 1. Kurban Ali s/o Sri Basheer Ahmad R/o Mauza Rajpur Block Bahadrabad, District Haridwar. 2. Rajkumar s/o Shri Chandrapal Singh r/o village Kalsia Post Raisi Block Khanpur, Tehsil Laksar, District Haridwar 3. Chhatarpal Singh Chauhan s/o Late Shri Chotey Singh R/o Village Chandrapuri Khadar, Post Chandrapuri Khadar, Block Khanpur, Tehsil Laksar, District Haridwar 4. Chatar Singh Chauhan S/o Shri Hoshyar Singh, Village Aadarsh Tehri Nagar, P.O. Ambuwala Block Bahadrabad, District Haridwar. ……. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through its Principal Secretary, Panchayatiraj, Dehradun. 2. Director, Panchayatiraj, Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 3. District Magistrate/District Election Officer, Haridwar, District Haridwar. 4. Election Commissioner, Uttaranchal, Dehradun ……... Respondents ……… None for the petitioners. Sri Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3. Sri Deepak Sharma, Advocate for respondent no. 4. Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble P.C.Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Petitioners’ counsel absent. Sri Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3. Sri Deepak Sharma, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Advocate for respondent no. 4. 2. Sri Subhash Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3 submits that the writ petition has now become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (P.C Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 24.04.2006 24.04.2006 A