IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 15468 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision:- 27.09.2011 Rajender Kant .....Petitioner Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and others .....Respondents CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. Tushant Deep Garg, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 2-HUDA. **** SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J(Oral). In view of Annexure-A1 i.e. letter dated 22.7.2011 annexed with the C.M. No. 10893 of 2011 whereby the HUDA has considered the prayer of the petitioner for allotment of alternative plot, counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the said fact he withdraws the present petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE 27.9.2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) reema JUDGE