IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 16142 of 2008. Decided on: 24.06.2011. _______________________________________________ Rajiv Sood. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate appearing vice Mr. Jagdish Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous with the passage of time. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. June 24, 2011. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?