IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22770 of 2008 SUDHIR KUMAR THAKUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 18/08/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. Case under sections 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code was registered. The petitioner is FIR named accused. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with others including Shiv Chandra Thakur has taken away the husband and brother-in-law of the informant in captivity for ensuring registration of land belonging to the informant’s father-in-law. Record of Cr. Misc. No. 20949 of 2008 has been called for and vide order dated 11.6.2008 of that case it appears that prayer for bail of similarly situated accused Shiv Chandra Thakur has been rejected. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. avin. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)