SSliia ;.i^; LN.mE.HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR r"r&^ *f WRFT PFTITION N0, 72006 PETITIONER ^ R.L. Kore, S/o Shri Salikram Kore Aged about 40 years, Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Haditola, R/o Block Ambagarh Chowki, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) RESPONDENTS Versus ^l) State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary School Education Department and Scheduled Caste and Scheduled ^.'.•-"' _. Tribe Department, D.K.S Bhawan ^^s> ^^•^^f"..- ^^s^ ...-•".'^\?T\ ^y v\^"" 2) The Assistant Commissioner Education, Collectorate Campus Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3) The District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRJT PFHTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTrUTION OF XI-HC-78 sn^r^rf^ri?; (laiTSn^Tshtllti -^. *11*1MI !tl*1|ch 3^ '^iiici^, »Tfltt'is,Isicii'My ^^^^.^^ 3TT§psT(ra^(^(fgg^sr) STaTWflfN'sn^T 20-7-2006 h\r. Satish Chandra Vermfc, Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, (5ovt. Lawyer for the State/responde^ts Heard on admission. iy the instant writ p®ti1 transfsr order dated 6-7-200^ he has been transferred underl 2006. Learned counsel for th^ ciause (^T) of clause 5 of the ^ taken into consideration the petitioner is working, two teacl|ier are already wor.king and fney turther submits thct on the dot/ able to rsmsin present on Head Master cnd that was reached, he was Informed tt cii'cumstaices, iearned counsel be oiiowed to make a reDresentah'ioi But, ciouse 7 of the scheh® Teaciliers dot/ accoilin tlhe the petitioner has to exhaust +i<ilci41-f HiiciTifte^<Ri+<;i< ^sri^irsn^T a, counsel for the petitioner. Advocate with Mr. Vinay Pandey, Panel i, on ad'/ance copy. rion, the petitioner hcs questioned his passed by respondent No.2, whereby the rationalization scheme dated 1-5- petitioner submits that as per sub- lcheme the respondents ou9ht to hcve Ifact that in the school where the who are juniors to the petitioner bught to have been transferred. He of counsslling the petitioner was not int of the fact that he was workinq as working day. and by the time he ^iat counseliing was over. In the a!so subinits that the petitioner may provides fo" on <mpeal. Therefore, that remedy before approaching this P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3^'HTraT?PT, »^f1w'IS, R|dlti^< __ ^3,^ S-Sg.<; ^l^dl *^11* •••••-•••''•••••••••/y- ^r 200^ 3T(^T4^th ('iqi^si^ff) 3TI^?T?iTR-fi* gw sn^r aim?) la. ^r pourt. The. petition is •iTier'efor^ (sccordingly, dismissed, in 1,'mine. ^ippropriate remedy availabie to him Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.2'; Soma 5RnW(Tf?(T3D^T 77 liable to be dismissed aid it is The petitioner may avail the lunder the scheme. p'5/2006 stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Jiidge 'hi<<T<n41-i wicft' ff fei^t' ^SRSK ^3rf^iT3n^r ^-&» ^ ^ P.T.O.