IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No: 20969 of 2000 Between: Md.Bhuranuddin, S/o Bashumia, R/o H.No.11-18-54/1, Saroornagar, Bhaghatsing Nagar, Hyderabad-500 035. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep by its Vice Chairman & Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep by its Depot Manger, Falaknuma Depot, Falaknuma, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order direction or writ particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents herein in proceeding with the disciplinary action in pursuance of charge sheet No.01/2 (5)/2000-FM dt 23-3-2000 is wholly illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents not to pass the ﬁnal order in the Departmental enquiry until ﬁnalisation of the criminal case in Crime No.44/2k on the ﬁle of the Munsiﬀ Magistrate, Shardnagar and pass such further or other orders as the Hon'ble Court deems ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: K.MADHAVA REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following : ORDER: It is represented by Sri D.Sunil Kumar, Advocate, representing Sri G.Vidyasagar, learned counsel for the petitioner, that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 04th November 2008 CVRK