Ladda 1 caw-1391 and 1393-11.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1391 of 2011 IN WRIT PETITION No. 1958 of 1997 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1393 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION No. 2338 of 1997 Dattatraya Ganpatrao Divgi and others ... Applicants/Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr ... Respondents. Mr Niranjan Moghe i/by Mr Arun H. Palekar, Advocate for the applicants. None for the respondents. CORAM: RANJIT MORE, J. DATED:- 25th August, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants. None appears for the respondents though served. Writ Petitions are of the year 1997. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the issue involved in the writ petitions is covered by the Supreme Court judgment reported in the case of Mohamed Kavi Mohamed Amin vs. Fatmbai Ibrahim 1997 (6) SCC 71. Ladda 2 caw-1391 and 1393-11.doc The learned counsel for the applicants further submits that the age of the applicant/petitioner Uday Ramdas is more than 62 years. – 2. In the circumstances and in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants, Registry is directed to place the writ petitions for final hearing in the week commencing from 3rd October, 2011. Both the Civil applications are accordingly disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.)