IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1890 of 2009 VIJENDRA KUMAR SINGH @ SABLU & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4. 6.7.2009 The matter has come up under the heading ‘to be mentioned’ at the instance of the Court on the office note pointing out that the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no.3 Dinanath Singh (D.N.Singh)was permitted to be withdrawn earlier on 6.2.2009 but he has also been allowed anticipatory bail by the order dated 24.4.2009. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that by inadvertence the factum of withdrawal of prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner no.3 was not mentioned before the Court when the matter was being argued on 24.4.2009 and thus the said order was passed. After withdrawal of prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner no.3 his bail application was moved on 19.2.2009 before the District and Sessions Judge, East Champaran at Motihari and by his order dated 19.2.2009 the petitioner Dinanath Singh (D.N.Singh) had already been released on bail, photo copy of the certified copy of the bail granting order dated 19.2.2009 of the 2 District and Sessions Judge to the petitioner no.3 has also been produced. In the above circumstances, the order dated 24.4.2009 is modified to the extent that the granting of anticipatory bail shall be confined to the other three petitioners of Cr.Misc.No. 1890 of 2009 excluding the petitioner no.3 Dinanath singh (D.N.Singh). (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) spal/