IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE: 29-03-2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.6746 of 2011 D.Balaji .... Petitioner Versus 1. The Regional Transport Authority, Tiruppur. 2. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Tiruppur – North. .... Respondents Prayer : Petition filed, seeking for a writ of Mandamus,directing the second respondent herein to communicate the order passed by the first respondent pursuant to the hearing held on 20.09.2010, in the Application of the petitioner dated 28.10.2008 and re-presented on 22.12.2008 for the grant of Share Auto permit forthwith. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Hariharan For Respondents : Mr.R.Thirugnanam, Special Government Pleader O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the first respondent is directed to consider and pass orders on the application of the petitioner, dated 28.10.2008, as per the directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court, by its order, dated 23.6.2010, made in W.A.Nos.1104, 777, 1013, 1110 and 1111 of 2009, within a specified period. 3. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents had submitted that the first respondent could not pass orders, as per the directions issued by this Court, by its order, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ dated 23.6.2010, made in W.A.Nos.1104, 777, 1013, 1110 and 1111 of 2009, due to the pendency of a writ petition, in W.P.No.7412 of 2010, wherein, an order of status quo had been granted, in respect of G.O.Ms.No.277, Home (Transport-VI) Department, dated 22.3.2001. Subsequently, the writ petition had been dismissed, by an order passed by this Court, on 22.1.2011. However, the Chief Electoral Officer, Public (Election) Department, Chennai, had informed that the granting of auto permits would be against the model code of conduct and therefore, no permits should be issued, after the coming into force of the model code of conduct, from 1.3.2011. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would sufficie if appropriate orders are passed on the application of the petitioner, dated 28.10.2008, after the results of the general elections are announced. 5. In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and in view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned, the first respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders on the application of the petitioner, dated 28.10.2008, for the grant of share auto permits, in respect of Tirupur District, on or before 31.5.2011, after the elections results are announced, if there are no further legal impediments for passing such an order. The writ petition stands ordered accordingly. No costs. Sd/ Asst. Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar cse To 1.The Regional Transport Authority, Tiruppur. 2.The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Tiruppur – North. 1 cc To Mr.KHariharan, Advocate, SR.22495 1 cc To The Government Pleader, SR.22870 Writ Petition No.6746 of 2011 SGL (CO) RH (28.4.11) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/