IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-11182 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.05.2011 Ram Bhaj ....Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate, for the petitioner Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.172 dated 11.3.2011 under Sections 332/352/186/506 IPC and 13-A/3/67 Gambling Act, Police Statio City Rohtak. This Court vide order dated 21.4.2011 has directed to release the petitioner on interim bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has already been released on bail and the petitioner has joined the investigation and shall join the investigation as and when asked to do so by the Investigating Officer. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, on instructions from SI Jagbir Singh, who is personally present in Court, states that petitioner is co-operating in the investigation and custodial interrogation is not required. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petition is allowed. Order dated 21.4.2011 is made absolute. (Alok Singh) Judge May 24, 2011 R.S.