1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3323 OF 2010 Yuvraj S/o Pandit Rankhamb, Age : 21 Years, Occu. : Education, R/o Omerga, Post Hadga, Tq. Nilanga, District Latur. .. .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through the Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32. 2. The Principal, MIT Jansanwad College, MIMSR Medical College Campus, Vishwanathpuram, Ambajogai Road, Latur, Dist. Latur. 3. The Principal, College of Computer Science and Information Technology (COSCIT) Ambajogai Road, Latur. 4. The Principal G. H. Raisoni Institute of Information and Technology, Gat No. 57/1, Shirsoli Road, Jalgaon. 2 5. The Registrar, North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon, Dist. Jalgaon. .. .. Respondents Shri V. G. Sakolkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. K. Tambe, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1. Shri V. D. Hon, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. Smt. Anjali Dube, Standing Counsel for the Respondent No. 3. Shri S. P. Shah, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4. Shri A. B. Girase, Advocate for the Respondent No. 5. CORAM : P. V. HARDAS AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 27TH JULY, 2010. ORAL JUDGMENT [Per P. V. HARDAS, J. ] : . Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned counsel for parties this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2. The petitioner who is aspiring student seeking admission to the other educational avenue available to him seeks the relief of issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondent No. 2 to issue transfer certificate (T. C.) of I year of Bachelor of Computer Application course. 3 3. Undisputedly, the petitioner had sought admission with the second respondent in respect of the course i. e. Bachelor of Computer Application for first year. It appears that, thereafter the petitioner left the college institute and sought admission elsewhere. It also appears that the respondent No. 2 has not issued the transfer certificate on account of certain dues not being paid by the petitioner. 4. In the light of the aforesaid facts, we deem it appropriate to decide this petition finally at this stage in order to resolve this piquant situation. We direct the petitioner to present himself before the respondent No. 2 on 02nd August, 2010 and further direct the respondent No. 2 to inform the petitioner as to the dues which are payable by the petitioner as per the Rules. On such dues being paid by the petitioner, the respondent No. 2 shall forthwith issue transfer certificate (T. C.) to the petitioner as is prayed for in the petition. We further direct the respondent No. 5/University to declare the result of the petitioner, on the petitioner producing the transfer certificate (T. C.) issued by the respondent No. 2. 4 5. Rule is thus made absolute on the above said terms with no order as to costs. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ P. V. HARDAS, J.] bsb/July 10