IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA FRIDAY, THE 1ST FEBRUARY 2008 / 12TH MAGHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 185 of 2008(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.14426/2002 Dated 28/10/2007 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN OP -------------------------------------------- GRAMA SAKTHI JANAKEEYA SAMITHI, REP. BY ITS CONVENER, K.K.RAVICHANDRAN, AGED 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT KUNNILAKATTU HOUSE, MARADU. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO SRI.JOSE PAUL (POOVAN) RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS IN O.P. -------------------------------- 1. P.J.JAMES, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER), CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, STATE OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. A.P.M.MUHAMMED HANEESH, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER), DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 3. JOSEPH.M.K., (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER), REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI. 4. MOHANDAS PILLA, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER), TAHASILDAR, KANAYANNOOR TALUK OFFICE. 5. SEBASTIAN, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER), VILLAGE OFFICER, MARADU. 6. ANTONY, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER), SECRETARY, MARADU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MARADU. BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SMT. K.MEERA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.B. KOSHY & K. HEMA, JJ. -------------------------------------------- CONT. CASE (C )No. 185 of 2008 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of February, 2008. JUDGMENT Koshy, J: By the impugned judgment, this Court directed the appropriate authority to take stern action for the removal of encroachment. It is the case of the petitioner that the order of this Court was not complied with. If any of the encroachers were not evicted, petitioner may approach the Panchayat pointing out the details and names of the encroachers and the Panchayat will issue notice to the encroachers and then take eviction proceedings against them, if it is proved that they are real encroachers. Without prejudice to such right of the petitioner, this Contempt Case is closed. Sd/- J.B.KOSHY, JUDGE. Sd/- K. HEMA, JUDGE. Krs.