IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 16TH MARCH 2010 / 25TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 31802 of 2009(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- PUTHIYAPURAYIL BHASKARAN, D/O.DEVI, AGED 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT AMBALAPARA, P.O.ETTIKULAM, (VIA) PAYYANNUR, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.N.RAMESAN NAMBISAN RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR. 2. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(LAND ACQUISITION), NAVAL ACADEMY, PAYYANNUR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.V.MANU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.31802 OF 2009 (U) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T Twenty five cents of land in R.S. No.71/6 of Ramanthali Village was acquired for the purpose of Naval Academy, Eahimala. Award was passed, compensation was paid and reference under Section 18 was not sought by the petitioner. 2. Subsequently relying on the judgment in LAR.No.213/87 petitioner sought redetermination of compensation under Section 28A. However, in Ext.P1application the survey number was mentioned as RS.No.71/3. By Ext.P2 order, Ext.P1 application was rejected stating that no land was acquired from RS.No.71/3. Petitioner thereafter made Ext.P3 application under Section 28A(3). That also was rejected by Ext.P4 stating that no land was acquired from R.S.No.71/3. 3. Evidently, even according to the petitioner there is a mistake in the survey number. If that be so, I cannot find fault with the authorities in rejecting the application for the reason that no land was acquired from the survey number mentioned in the WPC.No. 31802/09 :2 : application under Section 28A and in the application under Section 28 A(3). Therefore no relief can be granted. 4. It is clarified that this judgment will not stand in the way of the petitioner approaching the authorities again, if it is permissible in law. Writ petition is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/