IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 958 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 958 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO. 958 OF 2009 1. Mr. Madhukar Dharerao Pandhare & ors] .. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra & 3 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. S.G. Kudle for the petitioners. Mr. P.I. Khemani, AGP, for the respondents No.1 to 4. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. : 1. All the petitioners are candidates from the open category. The Government Resolution dated 16th October, 2008, provides for a reservation system to be followed by the Sub Divisional Officer in the Block. The petitioners were appointed in 1992. The period of five years is already over. Appointment is not anybody’s fundamental right. To regulate the services and appointments is the job of the Government and policy decision of the Government. The Government has provided for reservation system which provides for constitutional reservation and other reservations in favour of the backward communities and thus, the appointments are to : 2 : be protected. 2. Therefore, in order to enable the Government to implement the Government Resolution, we do not desire interfere and entertain the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, rejected. Sd/- Sd/- [D.B. [D.B. [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] BHOSALE, J.] BHOSALE, J.] [S.B. [S.B. [S.B. MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.]