1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.519 OF 2005 AND MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.520 OF 2005 M.C.A.NO.519 OF 2005 Mrs. Sweta D.Hirve & Ors. .. .. Applicants Vs. U.P.State Roadways Transport Corporation and Anr. .. .. Respondents -- AND M.C.A. NO.520 OF 2005 Savita Shripad Redkar & Ors. .. .. Applicants Vs. U.P.State Roadways Transport Corporation and Anr. .. .. Respondents -- Shri S.G.Bhobe, Advocate for the Applicants in both the applications. Shri A.B.de Sa, Advocate for the respondents. -- CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J DATED : 20TH JANUARY, 2006. ORAL OREDR : 1. Since the common question of law and facts arise for consideration in these applications, they were heard together and are 2 being disposed of by this common order. 2. Heard the learned advocates for the parties. Perused theapplications. 3. Considering the fact that all the applications arise out of the same incident, the respondents to the proceedings being the same and a common evidence would be necessary to be led in the matter, it would be in the fitness of case to have all the three matters to be heard by the same Tribunal and considering the same, the Claim Petition Nos.72 of 2003 and 73 of 2003 pending before the M.A.C.T., Mapusa, need to be transferred to M.A.C.T., Panaji, to be tried along with the Claim Petition No.107 of 2003. In the circumstances, therefore, for the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed and the Claim Petition Nos.72 of 2003 and 73 of 2003 pending before the M.A.C.T., Mapusa, are directed to be transferred and placed before the M.A.C.T., Panaji, for their disposal along with the Claim Petition No.107 of 2003. The applications accordingly stand disposed of. R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J 3