IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No.5351/2010 Date of decision: 27.8.2010 Neetu Sharma & ors Petitioners Vs. State of HP & ors.. Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B.Misra, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge Whether approved for reporting: For the Petitioner: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal Advocate. For the Respondent No. 1: Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Addl. AG with Mr. Anil Jaswal, Dy. AG. For the Respondent No.2: Mr. G.D. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent No.3: Mr. Karan Singh with Ms. Shikha Thakur, Advocates. For the Respondent No.4: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor Generalof India. __________________________________________________________ R.B. Misra, Judge (Oral ) The writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: “The present petition may kindly be allowed and the Annexures P-5 and P-6 may kindly be quashed and set aside with a further direction to the respondents to conduct the examination of the petitioners for the said course of JBT qua which the petitioners has already undergone prescribed course and completed the same successfully from the respondent No.3 institute in the session 2002-2004 as has been held by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Bhawna Sharma’s case keeping in view the submissions made herein above and in the interest of justice with a further direction to the respondents to award them the certificate/diploma for the said course if they qualifies the said examination.” 2. It is submitted that the present petition could be disposed of in the light of the decision rendered in CWP No. 4852 of 2010 passed on 20.8.2010 titled Ms. Samriti Arya & ors Vs. State of HP & Ors. Without elaborating the factual aspects in detail, suffice to say that as jointly submitted by the learned counsel for the parties, the present petition could be disposed of in view of the above decision. As such, the present petition is allowed in terms of the decision dated 20.8.2010 passed in CWP No. 4852/2010. 3. However, directions given are to be complied within two months from the date of production of the copy of this order. However, the examination has to be conducted in the meantime. In view of the above observations, writ petition is disposed of so also the pending applications. Copy Dasti. ( R.B.Misra ), J. ( V.K.Ahuja ), J. 27th August, 2010(sl)