CRM-M 15622 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M 15622 of 2009 Date of Decision: 19.8.2009 Ved Pal and others ....Petitioners. Vs. State of Haryana ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present : Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Partap Singh, Sr.DAG Haryana for the State/respondent. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.(Oral) Counsel for the petitioners, inter alia, contends that initially the case under Sections 147/148/149/447/379 IPC was registered against the petitioners and the petitioners had applied for anticipatory bail but at that time the police represented that there was no theft, therefore, the petitioners were not required under Section 379 IPC and as such, the application became infructuous and was withdrawn. Later on, the petitioners were arrested under Sections 147/148/447 IPC in which they were released on bail on 16.7.2008 (Annexure P-2). It is clarified by the counsel for the petitioners that Section 379 IPC has been wrongly written in the order Annexure P-2 as it was added later on. The petitioners apprehending their arrest applied for anticipatory bail before the Court below but it was dismissed on 27.5.2009. Counsel for the petitioners further submits that they have been released on interim bail in this case and have joined the investigation. This fact is admitted by the counsel for the State, on instructions received from SI Moola Ram. CRM-M 15622 of 2009 -2- In view of the above, order dated 5.6.2009 is hereby made absolute. The petitioners shall keep on joining the investigation as and when called for. They shall also abide by the provisions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition is disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 19.8.2009 JUDGE Meenu