IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31519 of 2009 NARAYAN CHOUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THRU. VIG. ----------- 02. 02.09.2009 Petitioner seeks restoration of Cr. Rev. No. 976 of 2009 by recalling the order dated 20.07.2009. The order dated 20.07.2009 reads thus: “When the case was taken up again learned counsel, who is not on record, prays for adjournment. On 1.7.2009 the following order was passed:- “When the case was taken up, a prayer for adjournment has been made out. As prayed for, list this matter after two weeks. It is made clear that no further adjournment shall be granted on any ground.” In the circumstances, this court has no option but to dismiss the application for non- prosecution. Order accordingly.” Considering the facts stated in the restoration application and the submissions advanced in support thereof, this court is not satisfied that a good case for restoration is made out. There is no merit in the application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. On the request of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, it is observed that the present refusal of restoration shall not preclude the petitioner from filing a fresh revision application. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)