CWP No.18707 of 2009 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.18707 of 2009 (O&M) Decided on : 03-03-2011 EHC Parveen Kumar ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr. S.N.Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana MAHESH GROVER, J The grievance of the petitioner is that he was brought on B1 list and was to be deputed to the said course which started in the year 2004 but before he could commence upon the course he met with an accident and as a result thereof he could not be deputed to the course. He made a representation expressing his inability to undergo the course on account of said reason which was accepted. The instant petition has now been filed with a grievance that his name could not be removed from the B1 list in view of the specific rules which contemplate that entry and removal of a name of a person in list A, B, C, D, E can only be done by making a relevant recording in the order book and the character roll of the incumbent. Reference has been made to Rule 13.1(3). The stand of the respondents as against the plea raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that after 2004 the petitioner never made any representation to be sent to the course in question even though CWP No.18707 of 2009 (O&M) 2 various courses were conducted between 2004 to 2008. Confronted with such a situation, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will not claim any benefit in the event of his being dispatched to B1 course for the period which has elapsed by now. He contends that if he completes the course he be given benefits from the date he concludes the course successfully. Learned counsel for the respondents states that they will reconsider the case of the petitioner and depute him to the B1 list in the eventuality of his being found eligible in other aspects and in such an eventuality he shall not be entitled to any other benefits including seniority etc. vis-a-vis incumbents who had already passed the course in the intervening period from 2004 till date. Having regard to the aforesaid, the instant petition is disposed of with the directions to the respondents to reconsider the case of the petitioner for deputing him to B1 course and in case he is found eligible to the said course, he be deputed for such a course without conferring any benefit to him for the period which has elapsed from 2004 till the time he concludes such a course. March 3, 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge