1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1862/2008 (Smt. Chanda Narayanrao Turankar Vs. Member, Industrial Court, Nagpur & ors. ) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATED : 17 th NOVEMBER, 2008. Heard Mrs. Palsodkar for the petitioner, and Shri Shantanu Ghate for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. No fault can be found with the impugned order passed by the Industrial Court, Nagpur, on 30th March, 2007 in Complaint (ULPN) No. 329/2004, as there was no employer-employee relationship between the petitioner-complainant and the respondent-Bank, as the deceased husband of the petitioner/complainant was an employee of the respondent-Bank and had died in an accident. The Industrial Court, Nagpur, rightly held in the impugned order dated 30th March, 2007, that the widow of the deceased could not have sought an appointment on compassionate ground by filing a complaint under Sections 28 and 30 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and 2 Prevention of Unfair Labour Practice Act, 1971. Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE RMP