1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Revision Application No. 109/2008 (Laxman Sampat Chandane VERSUS Manikrao Sampat Chandane) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri K.V. Thomas, counsel for the applicant. Shri N.B. Kalwaghe, counsel for the non-applicant. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 11, 2009. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By the instant civil revision application, the applicant had challenged the order passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mehkar on 04.10.2008 rejecting the application filed by the applicant for dismissal of the execution proceedings as being barred by time. Shri N.B. Kalwaghe, the learned counsel for the non-applicant, states that the non-applicant has withdrawn the execution proceedings bearing Regular Darkhast No.8/2007 on 07.02.2009. A pursis signed by the non-applicant as well as the counsel is filed in the Court on 2 10.02.2009. From the contents of the pursis and from the statement made on behalf of the non- applicant, it is clear that the cause of action for instituting the civil revision application does not survive. The civil revision application is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE