IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40765 of 2010 FULAN CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 09.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The report at Flag ‘A’ has been perused. It appears that the informant who has named the petitioner was examined but his evidence remained inconclusive. When he appeared on the next date, the defence refused to examine him on the ground of non compliance of Section 207 Cr.P.C. which is stated to have been now complied with. Let the Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur ensure the appearance of the informant on the date fixed for the purpose of his evidence and cross examination, whereafter if so advised the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. Let the order be communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur, in Sessions Trial No. 463A/2006 arising out of Bihpur P.S. Case No. 23 of 2003. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)