( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 1689 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11831 OF 2005 Sau. Nanda Dilip Chavan .. Appellant Versus Sau. Shilatai Nandkumkar Vadnere and anr. .. Respondents Shri R.N. Dhorde, Advocate for the appellant. Shri A.N. Nagargoje, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 15.07.2009 P.C. :- 1. This appeal is filed by the person who had taken objection to Change Report No.110 of 1999 filed by respondent No.1 before the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Jalgaon, informing that the meeting was held on 26.01.1997 and Madhavi Taware had been elected as Sanchalika of the trust. The appellant resisted said change report by complaining that Madhavi was not member and her name did not appear in the ( 2 ) Schedule I and she is self-proclaimed, unauthorised Sanchalika. The appellant also filed separate Change Report No.367 of 1999 for impleading her name as Sanchalika instead the name of Nirmalatai. The Assistant Charity Commissioner accepted Change Report No.110 of 1999 and has rejected the report filed by the appellant. The appellant filed change Report No. 72 of 2001 before the Jt. Charity Commissioner, Nashik which is dismissed on 03.04.2002. As against the same Misc. Civil Application No. 88 of 2002 came to be filed by II Adhoc Additional District Judge on 16.08.2005. 2. The learned advocate Shri R.N.Dhorde has taken me through the judgments of the Courts below. There are concurrent findings of fact. Exhaustive discussion is made by the Jt. Charity Commissioner in his judgment. 3. Being satisfied that all aspects were considered, the issues which are raised in this appeal are necessarily issues of facts and in view of concurrent findings of fact, in my opinion, this appeal cannot be admitted as no substantial question of law arises. In this view of the matter this Second Appeal is dismissed at the stage of ( 3 ) admission. Parties to bear their own costs. 4. In view of disposal of this Second Appeal, Civil Application 11831 of 2005 does not survive. The Civil Application also stands disposed of. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2009/JUN09/sa1689.05