WP(C) 1897/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. K Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. I Choudhury , learned Standing counsel, PWD, appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 5. The basic grievances of the writ petitioner is that the petitioner, the responde nt No. 6 herein and some others are bidders in the tender process, which was ini tiated with the publication of the NIT, dated 14-03-2008, and in this tender pro cess, the certificate, submitted by the respondent No. 6 to the effect that he h as completed satisfactorily similar nature of work, is not genuine and if it be so, the respondent No. 6 becomes ineligible to receive allotment of contract. Th e petitioner has already made a representation, in this regard, on 28-04-2008 (A nnexure-VIII to the writ petition), addressed to the respondent No. 3, namely, C hief Engineer, PWD (Roads), Assam, requesting the respondents to verify if the c ompletion certificate submitted by the respondent No. 6 is genuine, correct and true. If what the petitioner contends is true, it would obviously disentitle the respondent No. 6 from being considered for allotment of the work, in question. The whole controversy, therefore, rests on the answer to the question as to whet her the Completion Certificate, submitted by the respondent No. 6, is sustainabl e or not. Considering, therefore, the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justic e, it is hereby directed that the State respondents, particularly, the responden t No. 3, shall consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner in a ccordance with law. Until the time the representation aforementioned is disposed of, the work, in question, shall not be allotted to the respondent No. 6 even i f he is, otherwise, found to be entitled to allotment of the work. The direction for examination given by this Court, as indicated hereinbefore, shall not be co nstrued to mean that this Court has cast any doubt on the correctness or veracit y of the Completion Certificate, which the respondent No. 6 has produced in the tender process. The petitioner may furnish to the respondent No. 2 a certified c opy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition and annexures thereto. Furnish a copy of this order to the learned Standing counsel, PWD.