IN THE HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATISGARH) W^P. NO^-^£J-OF2003 PETITIONER ^^ ..•<(-<•• \^<^'' .-^•?;xspl' ..'' ..^""" ^\^&.9y Dr. Jagdish Prasad Khare S/o Late Awadh Bihari Lal Aged about 51 years, Junior Scientific OfBcer, Chhattisgarh CouncU of Science 85 Technology, Pt. Ravishankar University Campus, Raipur [C.G] .^'.<^ ? "^^ yff RESPONDENTS VERSUS cy Union of India through the Secretary, Ministiy of Personnel, Public Grievance & Pension, Department of Personnel 85 Traimng, 3Id Floor, Loknayak Bhawan, KhanMarket, NEW DELHI. Madhya Pradesh Council of Science & Technology, Vigyan Bhawan, Sceince Hffls, Nehru Nagar, BHOPAL [M.P.j 462 003 - through its Director Genreal - Principle Secretaiy, BHOPAL [M.P] Chhattisgarh CouncU of Science 8s Technology, Pt. Ravishankar University Campus, Raipur [C.G] Through its Director General, Raipur [C.G] State ofChhattisgarh, thm' secretary, High Education- Department of Science & Technology, Mantralaya D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur [CG] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE THE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS: XI-HC-22 sn^t^i Pt-li* 3(R^I 5ln^f<fr ^[?a; ^ ^athak/- •yst -aw\v\^, •a-S[wi»,^wwy. an^'i^? W.iP^No.'2261/2003 w>wi 'a>i •WI, 200 311^1 TOiRK^fftff Comdrittee 5-3-2004 Shri Manoj Paranjape, Advo^ ShriV.V.S.Murthy,Addl. Shri Manindra Shrivatava, Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, Pan^ With consent heard. The contention is that alloeat 3 are to be made under Section 43<| Committee pbpulariy knowii as R.^ Comnuttee has been extended up^ direction may be issued to the Shri Paranjape Submits that to the respondent rio. 2. Having considered the facts ori record, it is directed that a jres) within 7 days from today before t| Kapoor, Chairman, SAI BC, Roo| Vallabh Bhawan, Bhoopal- 462 0( representation bemg filed, fhe sam^ as possible subject to cooperation of^ Withlhis direction, the petiti<j Parties are entitled for certifid •=liWl<!l^'f 'iWdl' <i 'fezt <Ritji< i? <ffPaH 311^'H |afeforthe petitioner. S^anding Counsel for respondent no. 1. Ativ. forthe respondents no. 2 and 3. (1 Lawyer for the respondent rio. 4. (ion of employees ofrespondents no. 2 and l)(b). The Union oflndiah^ appointed a ^. Kapoor Committee and fhe tenn of said <o 30th Mai-ch 2004. Coynsel prays that to consider the matter. )ie has fflade a representation on 5-5-2003 Jmd circumstances ofthe case aad material (i represerrtation be fikd by the petitioneir tie Committee on the address - Shri R.EI 1 f- ^n No. 63, Ground Ftoor, "Matrtiaiaya'^1 \)4, as supplied by the Murthy. Qn sueH|g shall be considered afad decided as! gaf ^heparties. u is dispcsed of. ,dcopy offhe ord( ''•'f.-{ MB iIBI iifi t^»4r ^^^