HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.17966 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.09.2011 **** Surmukh Singh & Ors. . . . . Petitioners VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Nirmal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners **** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) (1). Notice of motion. Ms. Monica Chhibber Sharma, learned DAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Having regard to the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to call upon the respondents to file their reply(ies)/affidavit(s), at this stage. (2). The petitioners seek their entitlement for emolument/pension as per the revised pay-scales w.e.f. 01.03.2010 instead of 01.03.2011. (3). Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the issue involved in this writ petition stands answered by this Court in favour of the petitioners vide order dated 25.02.2010 passed in Surinder Kumar & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors. (CWP No.7464 of 2009). CWP No.17966 of 2011.doc - 2 – (4). The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of Surinder Kumar’s case (supra). (5). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 23.09.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge