THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.4310 of 2011 (Dated : 12-12-2011) Between: M/s. M.G.Auto Nagar Association, rep. by its President Sri Shaik Nanne Sab S/o Nanne Sab, Proddatur, YSR District. ...Petitioner/Plaintiff A n d M.A.Rasheed S/o V.Ahammam Moah and another ...Respondents/Defendants THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.4310 of 2011 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order dated 3-3-2011 passed in I.A.No.103 of 2011 in O.S.No.533 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Proddatur, YSR Kadapa District, whereby and whereunder the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge dismissed the application filed under Order VII Rule 14 CPC to receive certified copies of the registered renewal body of the petitioners association, amended by-law and Memorandum of Association. 2. Notice before admission came to be ordered on 18-11- 2011 and the petitioner was directed to take out notice to the respondents by registered post acknowledgment due and file proof of service. Accordingly, the petitioner took out notice to the respondents and filed proof of service. 3. Despite service of notice, none appears on behalf of the respondents. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the order impugned in the revision. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed photostat copies of the registered renewal body of the petitioners association, dated 14-4-2003, amended by-law of the petitioners association dated 15-3-2000 and memorandum of association along with an application under Order 7 Rule 14 CPC. A further submission has been made that the petitioner filed copies of the above-referred documents along with the plaint and that by receiving the certified copies of the above-referred documents, no prejudice would be caused to the respondents, as the above-referred documents have already been referred in the plaint. 5 As could be seen from the order impugned in the revision, the petitioner-plaintiff had filed photostat copies of the documents along with the plaint. What is sought for by him is to receive certified copies of the same documents. Since photostat copies of the above-referred documents had already been filed along with the plaint, no prejudice would be caused to the respondent–defendants by receiving certified copies of the same. Of course, there are laches on the part of the petitioner in filing certified copies of the documents in Court before the commencement of the trial. The laches on the part of the petitioner can be condoned on some terms. 6 In that view of the matter, this revision is allowed. Consequently, I.A.No.103 of 2011 in O.S.No.533 of 2006 shall stand allowed, subject to the petitioner depositing costs of Rs.1,000/- within 15 days to the credit of O.S.No.533 of 2006 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Proaddatur. On such deposit being made, the respondents- defendants are at liberty to withdraw the same. _____________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J Dt.12-12-2011 RAR