IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. No.M- 11006 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 7.03.2011 Anjna Vohra ...Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana ...Respondent BEFORE: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr.R.S.Malhotra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Crl.,M No.8991 of 2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, state that during investigation Sections 307 and 328 IPC have already been deleted. Now the FIR is under sections 341, 457, 380, 420, 506 read with section 120-B IPC. In view of above, amended petition under section 438 is taken on record. Crl.Misc. Stands allowed. Crl.Misc. No.M-11006 of 2010 Mr.Dhir, learned State Counsel on the instructions of ASI Kashmir Singh fairly stated that offence punishable under sections 307 and 328 IPC have already been deleted during the investigation and custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required . Crl.Misc. No.M- 11006 of 2010 (O&M) 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that irrational and indiscriminate arrest should be avoided in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Siddaram Satlingappe Mhetre Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2011 (1) RCR (Crl.), 126. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest by the arresting officer on his furnishing adequate bail bonds. (Alok Singh) 07.03.2011 Judge rp