IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27559 of 2009 CHHOTE LAL SAHU, Son of Late Kari Sahu, resident Of Village- Kharharwa, P.S.Laukahi, District- Madhubani………………………………………………………………………………Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar………………………………………………..Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 10.9.2009. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 364, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation in the First Information Report is that because of the land dispute the victim was kidnapped. Some persons have been mentioned in the First Information Report were all related to the victim and the informant. So far as this petitioner is concerned, he is not named in the First Information Report and he is said to be the “Samadhi” of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the only allegation that has come against him is that he is main of the accused, who is said to have planned the entire incidents. It is further submitted that the case is not for kidnapping for ransom rather the case was filed due to land dispute. Be that at it may, the petitioner, namely, Chhote Lal Sahu is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Jhanjharpur, District- Madhubani in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 12 of 2009 corresponding to G.R. No. 140 of 2009. U.K. ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)