IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 151 of 2011 Smt. Shmina Begum and others ……… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ………. Respondents Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr. Nandan Arya, AGA for the State/respondent nos.1 & 2. Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for respondent No. 3. Date of Judgment: 08.03.2011 JUDGMENT Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. The writ petition seeks to challenge the First Information Report lodged by the private respondent herein. From the averments made in the First Information Report, it does not appear that the same does not disclose commitment of cognizable offences. There is, therefore, no scope of interference in the writ petition. 2. However, the petitioners, as submitted on their behalf, will cooperate in the investigation and in the absence of such cooperation, it shall be open to the Investigating Officer to take such recourse to law as is available to him. 3. The writ petition stands disposed of. (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 08.03.2011 Aswal