•^ iH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Single Bench : Hon'bie Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh. J. Claimant .A.(C5 PR No. 79Q008 Narayan Das Vaishnav, S/o Gourdas Vaishnav (Bairagi), aged about 42 years, Occupation - Labour, R/o Viltage Sher, Police Station, Tehsil and District - Mahasamund (C.G.) versus Non-Ciaimants 2. La! Baghe! S/o Trilochan aged about 27 years, Occupation - Driver, R/o Hadaband, Police Station - Mahasamund, Tehsil and District - Mahasamund (C.G.) Mohan Lai Sahu, S/o Kanhaiya Lal Sahu, aged about - 30 years, Occupation - Registered Owner of Vehicle Truck bearing rsgistration No. CG 04/ZC-0859, R/o - Near the Old Block Office, Baronda Chowk, Main Road, Mahasamund, Tehsil and District Mahasamund (C.G.) Ths United India insurance Company Limited, Through Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Madina Building, Kutchery Chowk, Jail Road, Raipur, Dtstrict - Raipur (C.G.) Appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehictes Act, 1 3. Shri Shivendu Pandya, counset for the appellant/claimant. (Passed on 4"' of April, 2008) ShriShivendu that the default has been i, tearned counset for the appeilant submitted remos'ed as he has fited his Vakalatnama. Heard on admission. .3. The appellant/claimant is aggrieved by the award dated 08.10.2007 passed in plaims case No. 05/2007 by Chief Motor Accidents Claims ;Triburial, Bflahasamund (henceforth the Tribuna!) whereby the application under Section- 1S3(A) of-the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was dismissed in, —niscl view of the fact that the claima.nt did not suffer any permanent disability due to the accident. 4. Shri Shivendu Pandya, tearned counsel for the appellant did not dispute that the claimant did not suffer any permanent disability but had suffered oniy simpie injury. !n this vjew of the matter, the applicatton under Section 163 (A) ofthe Motor Vehicles Act was rightly dismissed. There is no merit in thls appea! whtch is accordingiy dismissed. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge