IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2011 / 8TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 312 of 2011(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SUNIL.S., RESIDING AT JESUS GIFT VILLA, TC 44/960, O.N.G. NAGAR, VALLAKKADAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI.RAJAN VELLOTH SRI.PRATHAP PILLAI SRI.BENOJ C AUGUSTINE SRI.SEBIN THOMAS RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMNET, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETRIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALIYATHURA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 696 008. 3. K.V.VARGHESE, KP 3/248 (A) KOTTOMANNIL HOUSE, TEMPLE LANE, NALANCHIRA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 696 015 4. MARIAM VARGHESE,KP 3/248 (A) KOTTOMANNIL HOUSE, TEMPLE LANE, NALANCHIRA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 696 015 5. GEORGE, KP 3/248 (A) KOTTOMANNIL HOUSE, TEMPLE LANE, NALANCHIRA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 696 015. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI C M KAMAPPU FOR R1-3 ADV. SRI.GEORGE JACOB (JOSE) FOR R3,5,DETENUE THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : A TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER DT.18.6.2011 EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT.20.6.2011 EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, TRIVANDRUM DT.20.6.2011 EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT DT.20.6.2011 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL // TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE K. M. JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS JJ., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(Crl.) No.312 of 2011 S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 29th day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph J., The petitioner is the husband of the alleged detenue. Allegation of detention is made against respondents 3 to 5. Respondents 3 and 4 are the parents and 5th respondent is the brother-in-law of the alleged detenue. 2. Today the alleged detenue was produced. We interacted with her and the petitioner. The alleged detenue would say that she went on her own and there is no illegal detention at all. We are convinced that there is no illegal detention. The Writ Petition (Crl.) is closed. K.M.JOSEPH, (JUDGE) M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, (JUDGE) dl/