IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48733 of 2008 AMAR NATH PRASAD Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 27.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that it is a case of money transaction only, in which petitioner agreed to return the admitted amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- in installment of Rs. 5,000/- per month, even then he is apprehending his arrest which never can be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 77 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Pupri subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)