1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1019 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.10 OF 2006 [Raju @ Manoranjan Vishwajit 2 Satyajit Roy. Vs. State of Mah.] ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, office : Court’s or Judge’s orders Memoranda of Coram, : appearances, Court’s : orders or directions : and Registrar’s orders : ----------------------------------------------------------------- None for the Applicant. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, APP, for the State. CORAM : CORAM : CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : DATED : DATED : JANUARY 18, 2008. P.C.:- 1. The applicant has preferred Criminal Appeal No.10 of 2006 challenging judgment and order dated 11th November, 2005 in Sessions Case No.206 of 2004 passed by the IInd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli. 2. The applicant has preferred this application through jail praying that an advocate from the legal aid panel on his behalf may be appointed to defend his appeal. He has also prayed 2 therein that the appeal be expedited. As far as the first prayer for appointment of advocate is concerned, as per order of this Court dated 11.9.2007 it is seen that Smt.S.J.Patwardhan, Advocate has already been appointed to represent the applicant. It may also be stated that by order dated 20.1.2006 appeal has been admitted. 3. As far as the second prayer is concerned, in case Criminal Appeal No.10 of 2006 is not heard by 1st August, 2008, liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for expeditious hearing. 4. Application is disposed of accordingly. . Office to communicate this order to the applicant who is in jail. 3 [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]