IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24675 of 2011 Sikhari Turi @ Shikari Turi Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 27.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This case relates to Tikapatti P.S.Case No.71 of 2010 registered for the offences u/s 366A and 376 IPC. The informant is the father of the victim who stated in the FIR that his daughter aged 12 years was going to School and as she proceeded 200 meters from the house, she was picked up by Bikram Turi and Siyaram Turi long with two unknown miscreants who took her away on motor-cycle forcibly. It has further been stated in the FIR that the petitioner and one Ram Chandra Turi were also involved in the occurrence. Petitioner has annexed the statement of the victim made u/s 164 Cr.P.C. who, in her statement, stated that Ram Chandra Bikram and Siyaram had taken her away and forcibly got her married to the petitioner and it has further been stated by her that nothing untoward had happened with her. It appears that this is a case of love affairs. It is also stated that though the case was committed to the court of Sessions but no witness has been examined so far. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner Sikhari Turi @ Shikari Turi is admitted to bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C.I, Purnea in S.T.No. 135 of 2011, arising out of Tikapatti P.S.Case No.71 of 2010. Jay/ ( Shivaji Pandey, J) 2