^. ^ c; Ratatu Singh, (Since dead) Son of Late Kewal Prasad Aghariya, resident of Village-Dehkoni, Tehsil-Janjgir, District 3ir.Ch Govardhsn Singh Bhardwaj, Son of Late Rataiu Singh. aged about 63 years, Cultivator, resident of Viiiage- Dehkoni, Tehsil-Janjgir, District Janjgir- Chsmpa (C.G.^ Prems Lal Bhardwsj, Son of Late Ratalu Singh, teacher, aged about 58 years, Resident of Janjgir, Chandaniyapara, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). Mohan Lal Bhardwaj, Son of Rataiu ilngh, Cultivator, aged about 56 years, Resident of Village Dehkoni, Tehsil- Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). Sohan Lal, S/'o. Late Rata'u Singh, aged about 54 years, Cuitivator, Resident of Village-Dehkoni, Tehsii-Janjgir, District Janlair-s Ramadhar Singh, Son of Prem Singl Aghariya, aged about 50 years, Occupation-Ciiltivator, resident of •Village Dehkoni, Tahsil-Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa. At present, posted as S.l. Police Station Takhatpur, residentof Muktidham Chowk, Sarkanda, Tahsi! & District- Bilaspur (C.G.). 'resent: Shri M.K. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners. *»,.I'"". Fi Shri Parag Kotecha, learned counse! for le ith The foilowing order of the Court was passed by Supta, C.J. Learned counsel for the parties are heard I.C.P. No. 43/2006, a petition for condonation of delay in filing the restoration Detition. 2) On due consideration, we are satisfisd that the petitioners have sueceeded in shov/lng sufficient cause for the delay in filin( restoration petition. 3) M.C.P. No. 1743/2006, therefore, is allowed and the delay in filing the restoration petition is hereby condoned. 4) Learned counsel for the parties are heard on the restoration petition. 5) The petltioners are seeking restoration of Second Appeal No. 984 of 1997 which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 16-08-2005. 6) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the partiss and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, we are satisfied that the absence of the petitioners' counset on 16-08-2005 Vi/hen Second Appeal No.984 of 1S97 vvas taken up for hearing, was based on bona fide grounds. ILUUJIU agpnf j 33psnf j3;q3 Bquig JEIUITM nung j -/PS -/PS -._. •jaqujnu ieui6.jo sii o^ pajo^saj si Z66l.io ^QQ •ON issddv uooes pue p3A^o||e s| 'ejopjsyi 'gooz/i.99 •ON 'O'O'iAl (2