IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5082 OF 2008 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.5083 OF 2008 Dama Krishna Waidande ...Petitioner Versus Proposed Ratnakar Griha Nirman Sahakari Society Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.S.G.Deshmukh for Petitioner. None for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. JULY 17, 2008. JULY 17, 2008. JULY 17, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Even though there is force in the grievance made by the Petitioner that the Court below has not recorded any reason why his candidature has been discarded, however, as it appears that Advocate Shri Ajitkumar Balgonda Patil is an independent person who has been appointed as the Chief Promoter (Representative) for and on behalf of the proposed Society by the Court, in : 2 : exercise of discretionary order, no interference is warranted in writ jurisdiction. 2. It is, however, made clear that if the Petitioner has any material to suggest that the said person appointed as Chief Promoter by the Court has committed any irregularity or acted in such a manner so as to cause prejudice to the Petitioner or any other member of the proposed Society, the Petitioner may apply to the lower Court to recall the impugned order, which application will be decided on its own merits, keeping in mind the argument of the Petitioner that the Petitioner has facilitated creating the corpus for formation of the proposed Society. 3. Petitions disposed of on the above terms. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.