1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. Civil Application No. 4003 of 2008 (Chandrabhagabai Dattatraya Raut Vs. Janardhan VitthalJadhav & anr.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATE : 14 th July, 2008 Heard Shri Kothari for the applicant, and Shri N.R. Kanungo for the respondent no.1. None appears on behalf of respondent no.2, though served. The learned counsel for the respondent no.1 opposes the prayer made in the civil application. It appears that the appeal came to be dismissed for non-filing the private paper book. The counsel for the applicant states that the paper book was later on filed in the Registry. In this view of the matter, it is necessary to condone the delay of 67 days in filing the paper book, for the reasons stated in paragraph 4 of the civil application. 2 C.A. is allowed and disposed of. M.C.A . ST. NO. 8178/2008 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, and the non-applicant no.1. It appears that the second appeal was dismissed for non-filing of the paper book and the private paper book was later on filed in the Registry. In this view of the matter, in the interest of justice, it is necessary to restore the Second Appeal No. 220/2005 on payment of costs of Rs. 500/- in the High Court Bar Library, Nagpur, within a period of two weeks from today. M.C.A. is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE RMP