IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1846 of 2011 BADRI YADAV, SON OF MALLU YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 25.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is husband of the deceased and the submission on his behalf is that independent witnesses have not supported the prosecution story and the informant has already entered into compromise. The report of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Danapur reveals that charge has already been framed against the petitioner and other accused and the case is pending for recording the deposition of prosecution witnesses. In the aforesaid circumstance, I do not feel it proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Sigori P.S. Case No. 37 of 2008 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 1370 of 2010, stands rejected. However, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after recording the deposition of informant in Sessions Trial No. 1370 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )