1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 3128 OF 2009 Shaikh Pasha S/o Shaikh Ismail Versus State of Maharashtra and another *** Mr. M. S. Choudhari, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 9th SEPTEMBER, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel for the accused/ applicant. The accused/ applicant is a Passing Officer in the bank, naturally an employee. In terms of banking service rules 25 (A) (B) he could not avail loan exceeding Rs.2,50,000/-. However, the record indicate the accused/ applicant for himself and his wife Shabana Begum has obtained total loan of Rs. 37,28,000/-. The very resolution dated 16th March, 2007 under which loans to the employees were sanctioned in the meeting is under cloud as some of the Directors have said that it is interpolation. The role of the accused/ applicant being explicit, custodial 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. interrogation will provide the clue as to how and for whom he has carried the activities and to what extent amounts of several depositors are routed to personal gains. Application rejected. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:09/09/2009. ans/3128