IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4282 of 2010 1. RUPA KUMARI D/O SATYENDRA PANDEY R/O VILL BISHELADUGAMA ,P.O.BENIPATTI,P.S. BENIPATTI,DISTT- MADHUBANI 2. RENU KUMARI D/O RAGHWANDER THAKUR R/O VILL BISHELADUGAMA ,P.O.BENIPATTI,P.S. BENIPATTI,DISTT- MADHUBANI 3. ANITA KUMARI D/O KAPILESHWAR PANDEY R/O VILL RATANPUR,KAMTAUL,P.O. KAMTAUL,DISTT-DARBHANGA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE D.M. MADHUBANI 3. DISTRICT EDUCATION SUPERINTENDENT MADHUBANI 4. B.D.O. BENIPATTI,DISTT-MADHUBANI 5. MUKHIYA RAJSHAHPUR,BENIPATTI (MADHUBANI) 6. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY RAJSHAHPUR,BENIPATTI (MADHUBANI) ----------- 02. 21.12.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that in view of the law laid down by the Division Bench in the case of State of Bihar vs. Mamta Kumari and others, 2010 (4) PLJR 318, he has no better claim than what the Division Bench has held. He, however, submits that in case Hon`ble the Supreme Court interferes with the Division Bench’s decision, may be he may have an occasion to re- agitate his claim. This Court has no quarrel with the submission and the proposition as such. Writ is dismissed as withdrawn with observation as above. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)