. I/' l^ s^ ^^^l^^ I^ |^i ?^ri';*SC«^, W ^o IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PETITIONER p.R.No......."—l--^;yte<3' presentedbya""-'"^^ dated... RESPONDENT / ..< ,<-..^ ^ ' .i .,1'^ /TI^^ ^- o- rtv' CHHATTISGARH 5 s—,. WRLT PETITION'NO.^^C/20^06 , Mangal Das Bafthel S/o Late Shyam Ratan B^hel Age about 46 years, Asstt. Teacher Govt. PrimarySchool Biladi Block-Tilda, Distt- Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. StateGovtofChhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) 2. District Education Officer Raipur(C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Block-Tilda, Disstt.-Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ XI-HC-78 3n^r?RtR;^ra? ifSTT 311^1 sh*l *11*1^11 *»TP* 35[Hrpn?pT, (S|T{IU<|<O, (siowy ^^..^^9..sl.2^.^ 200^ W^{ W* (<i°lid's'^d') ?^aTwnft(rw^T 18.8.2006;- Shri Somkant Verma, courtsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, 6ovt. Advocate for the State/respondents, on advance copy. 1-feard both the counsel. The case of the petition^r is that he is working as Assistont Teacher since 13-3-81 and as j(er the Instructions dated 24-12-98 issued by thg State of M.P. tha B.T.I., B.Ed. anct M.Ed. examii^ation on their own expenses after .22-10-64 are entitled for twiji advance increments and order of fiovernment is Annexure-P/l. the facts and circumstances detailed representation along w and in turn, respondent No.2 is «h|i)icf'i|)-iiniR?f if fscS dSrezre ^?3I^ir3^T Assistant Teachers who have passed The petitioner passed his B. Ed. examination on his own cost in 1)^8 year 1994 and a certificate to that effect is Annexure-P/3, but t(^e petitioner has not been 9iven the benefit whereas, similariy situ4ted persons have been 9ronted two advance increments under the drders of the Tribunal and this Court vide Annexure-P/4. f-faving heard learned cou^ssl for the parties, havi'ng regard to f the cdse, without expressing any opinion on -t+ie merit of the cas^, the petitioner is atlowed to make a (t'h copy of this petition raising ali his grievances to respondent No.2 tpithin a period of 15 days from today directed to examine the case of the petitioner in the light of averi^ents made by the petitioner in this P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3^'^TFTRTq', »Tny'IS,Rlcll^y *11*1MI 8i»ffqi ^ 200 31T^TTg^? (l^fg^ET) .SIWT^Tf^lTO an^Tshtii* Barve .,'^f ff K 5TgTWtrf?tT3n^T r-c petition ond in the representatic} to the conciusion that similarly the benefit of two advance incrtenients also covered for" grant of two Sovernment's order, then to pas^ from today, in accordance with lo^i/. With the direction aforesdid, Parties are entitled for cej'tified WlfeT'ft^ WRTffffei^ ^RSTC ^sri^Tsn^T •n a!so. If respondent No.2 reaches situated persons have been granted and the petitioners case is idvance increments on the baisis of i orders within a period of 3 months id, the petition stands disposed of. copy of thisorder. L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.