W HIGH COURT OF OHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR " Writ Petition (C) No. 4927 of 2009 1. Ram Lal Slo Shivchara‘n, aged about 42 years, R/o Seoni, Post Balod, Tehsil Balod, District Durg (CG) 2. Akhil Diwan S/o Shriv K.D. Diwan. aged about 38 years, Rio Balod, Tehsil Baiod, District Durg (CG) Versus RESPONDENTS 1. The state of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) The Collector, Durg, District Durg (CG) 3. The Sub Division Officer, (Revenue), Baiod, District Durg (CG) 4. ‘Tehsildar, Baiod, District Durg, (CG) PETITIONERS (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India) Appearance : Mrs. Renu Kochar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mrs. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents; i ORAL ORDER (11.02.2o1o) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard finally with the consent forthe parties. Petitioners-Ram Lat and Akhil Diwan have tiled this petition for the following reliet(s):- “10. RELtEF(S}SOUGHT: 1) This Hon’ble Court mayrkindly be pleased todirect the respondent no.2 to forthwith grant permission to the petitioner n01 and joint holders to execute the sale deed in favour of the petitioner no.2. 2) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may-deem tit and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitionertogether with cost of the petition.” Mrs. Renu Kochar, learned counsel appearing on behaif of the petitioners, submits that petitioner No.1 had applied for permission o sell V t m? wmc) No. 4927 of zoos— his land on which Revenue Case No. 1-A/74 year 2w5-2006 was registered. She submits that though the proceedingswere initiated on _ 10.7.2006 but ‘till date no fmai order has heen passed and thermatter is still pending before the Collector, Durg. She further submits that for the present, this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents, particulariy the Collector/respondent No.2 to dispose of the pending case at the earliest, so that the matter comes to end. This iimited prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioners is not opposed by the counsel for the State. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction that if the aforesaid revenue case has not been disposed of so far, then'respondent p No.2/Collector, Durg shail look into the’matter and see that the said case is diposed of as'early as possible preferably within a’period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioners before him. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands tinaily disposed _ of, Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Certmed copy as per rules. \