CRM No. M 36632 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 36632 of 2010 Date of decision: 29.03.2011 Simranjit Kaur and another ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. JJS Uppal, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent State Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate for respondents No. 5 to 8 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of direction to respondents No. 1 to 4 to provide adequate security and protection to the life and liberty of the petitioners who apprehend threat to their life from respondents No. 5 to 8. Reply by way of affidavit of Manmohan Sharma, DSP, Sub Division, Rajpura on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4 has been filed. The same is taken on record. As per the reply, statements of respondents No. 5 to 8 were recorded. They have also furnished their respective affidavits, CRM No. M 36632 of 2010 2 stating therein, that they have no objection to the marriage of Simranjeet Kaur (petitioner No. 1) with petitioner No. 2. As such, petitioner No. 1 need not have any fear at their behest. In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such. However, in case, the petitioners still feel threatened, they are at liberty to approach respondent No. 2, who shall look into the same and take necessary measures, if need be. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 29.03.2011 mohan