... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.866 OF 2003 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Mr S.A. Mudbidri for the Appellants. Mr A.S.Khandeparkar for the Respondent Nos.1-A to 1-E. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 28, 2006. : APRIL 28, 2006. : APRIL 28, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. The courts below have concurrently held that the Appellants have failed to prove that the suit properties are the joint family properties of the Plaintiffs and the Defendant Nos.1 to 4. After having heard the Advocates appearing for the parties, I find that there is no error in the view taken by the courts below. No substantial question of law arises. Second Appeal is dismissed. No orders as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE