GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2368 OF 1999 WRIT PETITION NO. 2368 OF 1999 WRIT PETITION NO. 2368 OF 1999 Mohan Mahadev Patil ...Petitioner versus Abhimanya Phansekar & anr ...Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri C.G.Gavnekar for the petitioner. Mrs. P.H.Kantharia APP for State CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 22ND JUNE, 2005 22ND JUNE, 2005 22ND JUNE, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. In this case the learned trial Judge framed the charge for offence complained of in the complaint i.e. u/s.420 IPC. This framing of charge was challenged before the revisional authority u/s. 397 Cr.P.C. and the revisional court on consideration of the entire facts and law came to the conclusion that no interference is called for. There is no jurisdictional error committed by the learned Judge. Hence petition is dismissed. ....