Page No. 0.-'.^^ ^ u IBI THE HIGH C&HSTQF as Btt.avspDR ( G.G<} W8IT PETITI0N N9« ^,31l1 y2oos» gm'lTlONEK SP@SBENT$ .Q' r'"vw r'.:- :-^e> ^^ Q&pal Batt BaharAya S&^^a^.^eeaaalel^ KashE&om village eadrtsiiGLL-siVg^l Marwahi Sost & Ts^SaXWahi Blstt.BilaSpar G»©» y&sasQS / li State of ChhatkAsgaEfo Thca&gh s Ghlef seeretary HAgher EdacatiGB Bepartment Bi»K%aaaVaP *. Ra^ar QS<^ ^ •^^N.e BeaP GIIIM Ghasldas Uialversity K©ialTafe»& E&st^Bilasp&r C»©« ^ Cblleeter^ Mla^nir G»©« 4^ Prinelpal* Oovt^ S<2i%»ce JP@st ©ra^iateQallege BdLla^iar <3|©^ ^ETITIOS WEER 3LRTiaE 226/227 @F THE Q3HSTlT|rT3DN ep Jsm^ BE»R ISSUASCB OF AppappRi^E SIiaT* 0il@ER AN© ©BBIRE^IQ^ ________jet?tA_»AA^.^-^ n ^^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH : BILA_SPUR Writ Petition No. 3314 of 2005 Petidoner Gopal Dutt Dahadya Versus Respondents State of Chliattisgarh & ottiers, WRFT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Present:- None for the petitioner. Slin P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State, ORDER(ORALl (P&ssed on tlus 26th day ofMarch, 2010) The matter is called for headng twice. On both occasions, noue appears nor is aay representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner inay not be interested ia tiie matter. 2) In view of the above, the writ petition is disinissed for waat of prosecution. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge