BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT 0£CHHATTISGARHAT^ BILASPUR C .R. No. APPLICANTS ^O Of 2005. ^ON-APPLICANTS N0.1AND 2 NON-APPLICANTS :-J:< Sharad Joshi, son ofMadhav Joshi, aged 34 years, Occupation Agriculturist, reside- nt ofVillage and Post Khandsara, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg (Chhattisgarh), 2. Smt. Madhulika MangmUcar, wife of Rajeev Mangmlkar, aged about 37 years, Occupation House wife, resident of Panchsheel Nagar, Raipiir (Chhattisgarh). VE RS U S •' (2.^1. Padmavati, daughter of Saheblal Mishra, Aged about 45 years, ^^ ^^ ••* f^>' y ^^> ^'./r. ..•••"' "</••" /; Q__2s.- Vinod Kumar, son of Chottelal Tiwari, /^ .->?^ aged about 27 years, ./ (I /3^. Mayawati, wife ofVinod Kumar, aged ^s .. About 25 years, All resident of Village Bhamsamuda, Tahsil Navagarh, District Durg (Chhattisgarh), nc^^l&- APPLICANTS 4. Smt. ^fedfiytifea K^othalkar, wife of Sashikant Kothalkar, Occupation House wife, aged about 32 years, resideat of Nepanagar (Madhya Pradesh), "5.' Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Branch Nawagarh, District Durg (C.G.), 6. Branch Manager, Durg-RajnaBdggB Gramin Bank, Branch Nawagarh, Dis|riet- Durg (Chhattisgarh), 7. All Concemed. NON-APPLICANTS N0.fi 1?Q 6 ~' Xl-HC—78 ^.n^sT g-i "fy;N;' wsni^'ss-f ^-e; Tq7<airrj4j, (Sfllfl'1'a, '[oldl-My C'./?-, ^o,<,,^,^,P, OTi?fira^C^ny^; i^nwafFT sntsi qnqfepN ^maf •St fegt ^re?^ ^gi!OTCT?% S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Aaarwal 04-11-2009 Shri H.B. Agrawal, Senior ^dvocate with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, counsel for the appiicants. Shri Pramod Kumar Verjna, Senior Advocate with Shri Raghvendra Verma, counsel for n4n-applicants No.1 to 3. Learned Senior Advocate [ appears for the non-app!icants submits that the disputed amount t$as already been withdrawn by the non-applicants No.1 to 3. j In view of the above, th^ only remedy is left with ttie applicants is to fite a civit suit clainjiing title over the disputed amount and the revision has now beco^ne infructuous. Therefore, the revision is dismissed as has becorrie infructuous. However, the applicants areifree to fite a civil suit clafming title over the disputed amount in accordance wlth law on its own merits. Sd/- N.K.Agrawal Judge Kvr