IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION (CRL) No. 12 of 2011 Bhupendra Singh and others. ……Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents. Present: Mr. Kamlesh Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought a writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the FIR dated 22.9.2010 registered as FIR No. 53 of 2010 under Section 147, 323, 504, 506, 427 IPC at Police Station Kaladhungi, district Nainital. 3. According to the petitioners, they are innocent and since a suit had been filed by one Bhagwan Singh (predecessor of the petitioners) against Sri Nandan Singh (father of respondent no. 3) under Section 229 B of U.P. Z.A and L.R. Act, which is pending before the competent court, the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners further contend that the date of incident has not been mentioned in the FIR. 4. On perusal of the FIR, it reveals that respondent no. 3 was admitted in the Base Hospital, Haldwani, but no Injury Report relating to respondent no. 3 has been filed by the petitioners in this writ petition. 2 5. If the date of incident is not mentioned in the FIR, in the opinion of this Court, this may be a good ground for grant of bail. 6. This Court is not inclined to issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the FIR. Therefore, the instant writ petition is dismissed. However, it is provided that if the petitioners move Bail Application before the Magistrate concerned, the same shall be decided expeditiously, without unreasonable delay. (B.S. Verma, J.) Vacation Judge 11.1.2011 Rathour