IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.11 of 2009 ARUN KUMAR, SON OF LATE RAM LOCHAN PANDIT, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA – JAKKANPUR – (OLD), NEAR D.V.C. GATE, P.O. G.P.O. P.S. JAKKANPUR, TOWN & DISTRICT PATNA. -------- PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. Versus 1. PANIPATI DEVI, WIFE OF LATE RAM LOCHAN PANDIT 2. SRI SHATRUGHAN PRASAD 3. SRI BINOD KUMAR BOTH SONS OF LATE RAM LOCHAN PANDIT, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA JAKKANPUR – (OLD), NEAR D.V.C. GATE, P.O. G.P.O. P.S. JAKKANPUR, TOWN & DISTRICT PATNA. ------- DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS. --------- 11. 25.1.2011 Heard the parties. The appellant has prayed for setting aside the order dated 25.10.2008 passed by the Sub Judge 1st, Patna, in Title Partition Suit No. 283 of 2005 by which he has refused for appointment of receiver for collection of rent in the joint property which is subject matter of the suit. Since the appellant and the defendants are mother and brothers respectively, in my view, instead of proceeding with appointment of a receiver, the entire suit should be disposed of expeditiously. In view of such, I am not inclined to enter into the merits of the case and I direct Sub Judge-I, Patna, to conclude the proceedings of Title Partition Suit 283 of 2005 within a period of one year from the date of receipt of the order. The appellant and the defendants shall under no circumstances be granted unnecessary adjournment during the proceedings. With this observation, the application is disposed of. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)