IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revision No.2812 of 2009 Date of decision:18.12.2009. Jatinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus Anjali and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this petition may be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to apply for reappraisal of the quantum of maintenance in the light of the averred changed circumstances that the petitioner – husband has since been terminated from his initial service which fetched him a monthly emoluments of more than Rs.36,000/- and in the present job, he gets only monthly emoluments of Rs.3,000/-, which is barely sufficient to sustain himself. Learned counsel for the respondents states that he will contest this averment before the learned Trial Court in view of the fact that the petitioner – husband had made a precise averment in the course of a plea filed by him before the Guardian Court that he is possessed of sufficient resources and that the respondent – wife has no means of sustenance. Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforementioned. December 18, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE