C.R. No. 3871 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 3871 of 2010 Date of Decision: 21.09.2010 Ram Raj .... Petitioner Versus Sham Lal and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Som Dutt Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Gourav Goel, Advocate for the respondents 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed challenging order dated 27.5.2010 passed by Addl. District Judge, Ambala whereby the appeal filed by the defendants was allowed and ad interim injunction granted by the trial Court was vacated. Both the learned counsel for the parties appearing before me stated that present petition be disposed of with their consent in the following terms:- (i) Parties shall maintain status quo qua the possession and nature of the property during the pendency of the suit. (ii) No party shall seek unnecessary adjournment from the trial Court. C.R. No. 3871 of 2010 2 (iii) Hearing of the suit shall be expedited and every effort shall be made to get the suit decided preferably within 6 months With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, present petition stands disposed of in the above terms. (ALOK SINGH) 21.09.2010 JUDGE reena