Criminal Misc. No. M-14976 of 2011(O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. M-14976 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: November 16, 2011 Zile Singh ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr.K.C.Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Satyavir Singh Yadav, Dy. Adv. General, Haryana Mr.Ram Pal Verma, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) By this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short `CrPC'), Zile Singh seeks quashing of First Information Report (for short 'FIR) No.290 dated August 13 th, 2010 registered under Sections 186, 294 and 332 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') in Police Station Ganaur, District Sonepat. 2. The FIR was lodged on the statements of Parmeshwari Devi and Santosh Kumari, Child Development Project Officer (CDPO) and Supervisor, respectively, in the office of CDPO, Ganaur, District Sonepat. Allegations levelled were that on August 13 th, 2010, the petitioner came to the office of CDPO and misbehaved with Santosh Kumari and obstructed her in discharge of her public functions. It was also alleged that, thereafter, many times, he indulged in obscene acts in public place and deterred Santosh Kumari from her public duties. 3. The solitary submission of the learned counsel for the Criminal Misc. No. M-14976 of 2011(O&M) [2] petitioner is that an enquiry was conducted by the Director General of Police, CID, Haryana, who vide letter dated February 21 st, 2011 (Annexure P4) written to the Director, Women and Child Development, Haryana, stated that respondents No.2 and 3 were not performing their duties properly. They did not make payment of wages to Sukhdei, Bharpai and Murti Devi of village Bali Kutubpur, for the labour work done by them under VLC Scheme, rather, it was made to Veermati, Bala and Nirmala . Parmeshwari Devi assaulted Zile Singh and also insulted him. 4. The plea raised on behalf of the petitioner is a disputed question of facts. The allegations levelled by Santosh Kumari in FIR (Annexure P2) against the petitioner cannot outrightly be rejected, at this premature stage. It shall not be proper to consider the defence of the accused or conduct a roving enquiry in respect of the merit of the accusation while hearing a petition under Section 482 CrPC. 5. Hence, finding no merit in the petition, the same is dismissed. November 16, 2011 ( NAWAB SINGH ) `gian' JUDGE