mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3126 of 2008 Sou.Kamal A. Tandale .. Petitioner versus Gopal Keshav Patil .. Respondent ... Mr.S.G. Deshmukh for the petitioner. Mr. Umesh Mankapure for the respondent. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 28th August 2008 P.C.: 1. It is brought to my notice that the construction of the windows and wall in question has already been completed. Counsel for the respondent submits that in fact entire construction activity is completed. In that sense, nothing survives for consideration in this petition in as much as it is directed against the order passed on application Exhibit-5 which prayed for that limited relief. In the circumstances, without examining the merits of the controversy raised in this court, this petition is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to take out such other application for appropriate relief as may be advised which will have to be decided on its own merits in accordance with law. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this proceeding, measurement was undertaken by T.I.L.R. pursuant to courts order. However, the petitioner has some grievance regarding the correctness of the said measurement. The petitioner is at liberty to question the correctness of the said measurement by way of appropriate remedy before the superior authority if so advised. That will have to be decided on its own merits in accordance with law. 3. Petition is disposed off in the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)