IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-9313 of 2009 Date of decision : December 4, 2009 Ajay Bajaj Petitioner Versus State of U.T. Chandigarh Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Present : Mr. R.M. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for U.T. Chandigarh Mr. Pawan Dabla, Advocate for the applicant/complainant NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for U.T. Chandigarh states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required by the police. Learned counsel for the applicant/complainant states that gold jewelry is yet to recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, states that the entire recovery has been duly effected and there is no gold jewelry lying with them. Without going into the merits of the case, let the petitioner deposit an amount of Rs. 1.50 lacs before the trial Court which shall be put in fixed deposit and will be released to the party who ultimately succeeds. In view of the same, order dated 2.4.2009 is made absolute subject to deposit of Rs. 1.50 lacs within two weeks. Allowed as above. (Nirmaljit Kaur) 4.12.2009 Judge reena