IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 450 of 2008 Rohit Sharma @ Nidesh Sharma. ...... Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. ........ Respondents None for the Petitioner Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. None for the Petitioner Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against the petitioner before the Circle Officer concerned and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit the chargesheet before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the supplementary counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 16.02.2009 V.K