In the Punjab and Haryana High Court,at Chandigarh. RFA No. 1253 of 1991 Decided on February 26,2009. Haryana State and another --Appellants vs. Parveen Kumar -- Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Rajiv Kawatra, Senior DAG,Haryana, for the appellants. Mr.Ajay Jain,Advocate, for the respondent. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J: (Oral) This judgment shall dispose of seven Regular First Appeals bearing RFA No..1253 OF 1991 filed by the State of Haryana and another with X-Objection No. 85-CI of 1991 filed by the claimant, RFA No. 470 filed by the State of Haryana and another, RFA No. 1254 filed by the State of Haryana and another with X-Objection No. 86-CI of 1991 filed by the claimant , RFA Nos. 1251,1252,1255 filed by the State of Haryana and another and RFA No.165 of 1991 filed by the claimant, against the award of the learned District Judge, Hisar,dated 17.9.1990. At the very outset, Mr.Ajay Jain, learned counsel appearing in connected RFA No.2419 of 1990 (disposed of separately vide order of even date) states at the bar that the present appeals are covered by a decision of this Court rendered in RFA No.1456 of 1990 titled Rattan RFA No. 1253 of 1991 -2- Singh and others Vs. The State of Haryana, decided by Hon'ble Mr.Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel on 27.8.2004. It is contended by Mr. Jain that the award of the Reference Court to the tune of Rs.1,20,000/- per acre has been upheld because the appeals filed by the claimants as well as the State of Haryana were dismissed. This statement is not disputed by Mr.Rajiv Kawatra, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General,Haryana. In view of the above, the present appeals and the X-objections are disposed of in terms of the order passed in RFA No.1456 of 1990 titled Rattan Singh and others Vs. The State of Haryana, decided by Hon'ble Mr.Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel on 27.8.2004. February 26,2009 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge