HI§I+COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH AT BILASPUR Wfit Petition ($) N9. 10$$ ¢f 200$ Petitioner Ramnath $ahu S/o Samay La! Sahu. aged about 48 years, Asstt. Teacher. Government Primary School. Bodsara. Brock Nawagarh Distt. Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) Versus Respondents *1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through:- $ecretary, Department of Education, Mantralaya. D.K.S. Bhawan. Raipur. (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer. District Janjgir- Champa (6.6.) 3. Block Education Officer Nawagarh Distt‘ Janjgir—Champa(C.G.) WRIT P§TITQIN UNDER ARTIGLE 22$ 9F THE CONsrn'UTION OF iNDiA Singie Bench : Hon‘ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Ashwani Shukia. Advocate for the petitioner. Shri U. N. S. Dee, Govt. Advocate for the respondents. ORAL. ORWR (Passed on this 21 5t day of February, 2008), 1. The petitioner was appointed initially, on a nxed pay of Rs. 1001-. The petitioner was thereaner, granted regular pay scale on completion of the probation period. 2. The question of law invoived herein is, asto whether the petitioner is entitted to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as wetl as learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State. jointly submit that the facts and question of law. involved in the present writ petition, are the same asto that of in W.P.(S) No. 3566/2007 ( Loknath Patei Vs. State of Chhattisarh & others). which was allowed vide order dated 27.6.2007. 4. In View of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms i.e. petitioner is entitled for regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. subject to veriiication of the facts. No order asto costs. T‘/g’ sans K Agnihmrg a . /Sd/- dge I Thakur a tHGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT QILA$PQR W‘t “o .1 o Petitioner Sushi! Kumar shrivastava, Sic. Way Kumar Shrivastava, aged about 35 ‘ years, authorized to work Magazine Clerk Store Clerk, Jhilmili CoHiery. under Baikunthpur Area, S.E.C.L. Distt. Koria (C.G.). Versus 1. South Eastern Coamelds Ltd., Through Respondents i‘ls Chairman—cum-Managing Director, Seepat Road. Bilaspur (0.6.). 2. Chief Genera! Manager S.E.C.L. Baikunthpur Area, RO. Baikunthpur, District Koria (C.G.). 3. $ub Area Manager. Jhilmiii, P.O. Pandavpara, District Koria (C.G.). WRIT PETIIOE UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Singie Bench : Hon‘ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihctri, J. Shri S. N. Prasad. Advocate for the petirioner. 2 x4 Thakur CRAL QRDER (Paeced on this 2’1 S’ day of February, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. on instructions, submito that the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. i ‘i’ \ ' .VSdl- i fa ‘ Satish‘K.Agn%hntré ~ \. ’ ” Judge k ia—M’g‘ i i‘