(1) CRI.APP. 2589.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2589 OF 2010 Shriram Radhakrishna Dhoot .. Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents ... Mr. R.R. Mantri, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. V.D. Godbharle, APP for the respondent-State Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the respondent no.2 ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 28TH OCTOBER, 2010 PER COURT:- 1. Heard. 2. The Application seeking leave to Appeal is granted in view of the fact that though the cheque was presented on two occasions and was dishonoured, yet this aspect is not properly appreciated by the learned Magistrate and that there appears inconsistency as regards the admissions of the complainant/applicant in respect of the information given to the Income Tax Department about the transaction. The question of jurisdiction however, is prima facie a debatable question and will have to (2) CRI.APP. 2589.2010 be considered with more details. It appears that the case of "Ahuja Nandkishore Dongre V. State of Maharashtra" 2007(1) Bom.C.R. (Cri.) 1031 is under consideration before the Apex Court in the context of Special Leave Petition filed against the decision of the Nagpur Bench. The jurisdictional issue is, therefore, yet to be finally determined by the Apex Court in a bunch of Petitions involving the same issue. 3. Admit. Call R & P. 4. The paperbook is dispensed with. The Appeal to be heard expeditiously after the R & P is received. Sd/- [V. R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp