IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2009 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 RP.No. 1160 of 2009() [AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 8.10.09 IN W.P(C).28230/09] --------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S): 4TH RESPONDENT ------------------------------------ T.V.ANTONY @ ANTHONY, S/O. KUNJU VAREED, AGED 55 YEARS, THEKKANATH HOUSE, CHENGAMANAD KARA, ALUVA TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.E.C.POULOSE RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONE AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 ----------------------------------------------- 1. KURIAN S/O. KUNJUVAREED, AGED 60 YEARS, THEKKANATH HOUSE, CHENGAMANAD KARA, ALUVA TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVT. DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. CHENGAMANAD GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PUTHUVASSERY, NEDUMBASSERY.P.O., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 4. THE PRESIDENT, CHENGAMANAD GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PUTHUVASSERY, NEUMBASSERY.P.O. R1 BY ADV.PAUL K.VARGHESE. R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- R.P.No.1160 OF 2009 IN W.P(C).No.28230 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2009 O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, counsel for the first respondent as also learned Government Pleader for the second respondent. Notice to respondents 3 and 4 dispensed with, preserving their right for re-hearing of the matter, if aggrieved. This application is essentially one seeking re-hearing of the writ petition. Having heard counsel for parties, I am satisfied that the writ petition deserves to be heard again. Accordingly, this review petition is allowed. The judgment dated 8.10.2009 in W.P(C).28230/09 is vacated and the writ petition will be listed for further hearing. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.4/12.