IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6458 of 2009 MANOJ PANDEY @ MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SANGRAON, P.S.- RAJPUR, DISTRICT BUXAR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.7.2009. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under sections 21/25/27(A)/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act as it is said that Brahma Roy was apprehended by the police and from his custody 16 grams of heroine, which is said to have been supplied by Manoj Pandey, son of Satydeo Pandey was recovered. 2. Counsel submits that perusal of the first information report would indicate that Manoj Pandey, who is named in the first information report, is the son of Satydeo pandey whereas the petitioner Manoj Pandey @ Manoj Kumar Pandey is the son of Shankardeo Pandey and his implication in the instant case is uncalled for as he is different from the accused named in the F.I.R. Let the petitioner surrender in the court below within four weeks from today and the court below examine whether petitioner is son of Satyadeo Pandey or Shankardeo Pandey - 2 - N.H./ and if the court below is satisfied that he is son of Shankardeo Pandey and not Satyadeo pandey then he (Manoj Pandey @ Manoj Kumar Pandey) be admitted to the privilege of bail on furnishing bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Buxar in Rajpur P.S. Case No.9 of 2005, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C., otherwise this order should not be given effect to. Until such enquiry, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner, but it is made clear that enquiry must be concluded within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioner. ( V.N. Sinha,J.)