ash 1 cra-147.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 147 OF 2011 Shri Amrutlal Vishwakarma. .. Applicant. Vs Shri Omprakash Mishra. .. Respondent -- Smt. Charushila V. More for the Applicant. Shri V.S. Pandey i/by Shri S.U. Pandey for the Respondent. -- CORAM : A.S. OKA, J DATED : 19TH DECEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicant and the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant on instructions of the Application who is personally present in the Court states that the applicant is not pressing the Revision Application on merits. She states that the wife of the applicant is unwell and the Applicant does not have any other premises. She, therefore, prays that a longer time to vacate the suit premises be granted subject to filing usual undertaking. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent opposes the said prayer. 3. The Applicant is not pressing the Revision Application on ash 2 cra-147.11 merits and, therefore, the decree for possession will attain finality. It appears that the Applicant is residing in the suit premises which is a small room for last several years. Therefore, time of one year deserves to be granted to vacate the suit premises. 4. Accordingly, I pass the following order: ORDER : (a) The Revision Application is dismissed as not pressed. (b) Notwithstanding the dismissal of the Revision Application, the decree for possession shall not be executed till 31st December, 2012 subject to condition of the Applicant and all adult members of his family filing usual undertaking in this Court within a period of four weeks from today. (c) If undertakings are not filed within the stipulated time, the decree for possession shall forthwith become executable. (d) Civil Application No.110 of 2011 does not survive and the same is disposed of. ( A.S. OKA, J )