1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2483/2009. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Pradeep Deshmukh, Adv. h/for Mr. NA Joshi, Advocate for the applicants; Mr. PM Shinde, APP for State. __ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 30th July, 2009. ... 1) Heard learned Counsel. 2) Meera was married on 13th February, 2001 to Suresh Santram Gardi. After the marriage, it is alleged by her brothers and parents, that she was ill-treated for begetting a male child. Unfortunately, Meera succumbed due to burn injuries. There is no dying declaration. The Inquest panchanama dated 29.6.2009 explodes the position. She was completely burnt. The family members Satish Madhukarrao Hanchate; Madhukar Digambar Hanchate; and Shobhabai Madhukar Hanchate, have in their respective statements contended that the husband was suspecting fidelity of the wife and the in-laws were also torturing her. There are no specific incidents barring the incident dated 29.6.2009 disclosed by Baburao having 2 received a phone call while the complainant Satish contended that he had a phone call from his sister immediately before her death. The applicants herein Santram and Kantabai are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased, aged 80 years and 75 years approximately, associated with sufficient ailments. Sunita, is sister-in-law residing in the vicinity; Chandrakala is sister of husband, resides at Wadawani, Tq. Wadawani, District Beed, at a distance of 72 kms. away from the place of incident. The role attributed to these applicants, in the fact situation, is not glaringly indicated. Considering the nature of accusations and since they are in custody from 1st July, 2009, the applicants/accused deserve bail. The observations will not be parameters for any consideration of bail for husband - Suresh Santram Gardi, as his case is naturally based on different pedestal. 3) The applicants/accucsed - 1) Santram s/o Janardhan Gardi; 2) Kantabai w/o Santram Gardi; 3) Sunita w/o Dattatraya Gardi; and 4) Chandrakala w/o Suresh Gonje, be released in Crime No.106/2009, registered at Dindrood police station, District Beed on their individually furnishing PR bond and surety in the sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand). 4) After release, the applicants/accused shall attend the concerned Police Station on every Sunday between 9.00 3 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. for a period of one year. The applicants/accused will not coerce and influence the witnesses. 5) The application is allowed in above terms. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/cran2483.09