IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4548 of 2008. Decided on: 24.07.2010. ________________________________________________________________ Jagdish Chauhan. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents. : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Ms. Salochna Kaundal, Advocate vice Mr. O.P. Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous with the passage of time. Consequently, the same is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. July 24, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?