IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.156 OF 2010 Between: Gudivada Bhaskar Rao and others .....PETITIONERS AND Ganapathiraju Sreerama Raju (died) and others ....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.156 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, under Order XLIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (for short, “C.P.C.”), is directed against the order, dated 31.10.2009, in I.A.No.1444 of 2009 (new) in I.A.No.836 of 2007 (old) in O.S.No.1509 of 2007, on the file of VI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, whereunder and whereby, the petition, filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C., to grant interim injunction restraining the petitioners/defendants from interfering with the respondents/plaintiffs peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property pending disposal of the suit, was allowed. 2. Heard both sides. 3. Admittedly, the petition schedule property is a vacant land. To preserve the property as it is, pending determination of the rights of both the parties, there shall be an order of status quo with regard to maintaining the property as it is, including not to make any constructions or structures by both the parties. As the suit is ripe for trial, the trial Court shall dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible. 4. With the above observation, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________ K.C. BHANU, J February 08, 2011 MD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.156 OF 2010 February 08, 2011