IN THE PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.5625 of 2011 Date of Decision: 18.11.2011 Joginder Singh …Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr. S.S.Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Singla, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 & 3. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner claims a writ of mandamus claiming that excess amount deposited by the petitioner be refunded. It has come on record that the petitioner availed two loans amounting to Rs.3,20,000/- i.e. Rs.2,40,000/- for the purchase of tractor and Rs.80,000/- for agricultural credit limit, on 06.12.2000. Both the accounts of the petitioner became non-performing asset. A civil suit for recovery of Rs.4,78,360/- was filed in respect of tractor loan account. The petitioner was granted benefit of Rs.2,77,734/- under the Debt Waiver Scheme, 2008, whereas the entire outstanding loan amount of Rs.1,42,772/- against the agricultural credit limit account was waived off. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has deposited Rs.2,52,000/-, which is in excess of the amount due after granting CWP No.5625 of 2011 2 waiver is not tenable. The petitioner is not taking into account his outstanding against the agricultural credit account. In view of the above, we do not find any merit in the present writ petition. The same is accordingly dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 18.11.2011 (G.S.SANDHAWALIA) Vimal JUDGE