1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3045 of 2008 (Ramesh s/o. Balaji Sanap .vs. State and Ors.) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= CORAM : D.D.Sinha and A.P.Bhangale, JJ. DATE : 11.7.2008. Heard Mr. S.U.Bhuyar, Adv. for Petitioner and Mr.D.P.Thakare, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Counsel for petitioner states that the petitioner has already made representation dt. 16.1.2008 to the respondent no.2 Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Buldana. It is contended that, on the earlier occasion, petitioner had filed Writ Petition No.813 of 2008 for redressal of his grievance; however, the same was permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the remedy of representation. It is submitted that, after the said decision, petitioner approached the Chief Executive Officer with a request to decide the representation; however, till this date, the Chief Executive Officer has not decided the same and therefore, the petitioner has to file second Writ Petition for direction to the Chief Executive Officer to decide the representation on its own 2 merits, according to law, within a stipulated period. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, we dispose of present Writ Petition with a direction to the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Buldana to decide the above referred representation of the petitioner, if not decided earlier, on its own merits, according to law within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order. The Registrar (Judicial) is directed to communicate this order to the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Buldana forthwith. JUDGE JUDGE ssj