IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRL.P.NO.3135 OF 2010. Date:07.04.2010 Between:- R.Satish ..Petitioner/A-1 And State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and another. .. Respondents ORDER:- The petitioner/accused No.1 is accused of offences under Sections 323 and 506 I.P.C. The matter is pending before the Magistrate Court for trial. At that stage, the petitioner filed this petition for quashing proceedings in the pending case C.C.No.8 of 2010 of the lower Court. 2. When the matter came up for hearing before this Court, it is stated by the petitioner’s counsel that the matter is compromised between the petitioner and the defacto complainant/second respondent and that both the parties are ready to appear before the Court for recording the compromise. In my opinion, the said exercise has to be done before the Court in which the criminal case is pending. 3. Therefore, both the parties are directed to approach the lower Court by way of necessary petitions for recording compounding of the offences. Then, the lower Court will record the compounding in so far as they are provided under Section 320 Cr.P.C. In case, the lower Court finds it difficult to record compounding in respect of offences not covered by Section 320 Cr.P.C., then, the parties will be at liberty to approach this Court by way of appropriate petition. 4. Subject to the above observations, the petition is dismissed. _​_________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J 7th April 2010 AMD