1 rng IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 921 OF 1988 P.R.Parekh .... Petitioner Vs. Union of India & ors .. Respondents Mr.Vikram Nankani i.b Mr.S.D.Nankani for Petitioner Mr.A.S.Rao for Respondents CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I.Rebello and : F.I.Rebello and : F.I.Rebello and J.H.Bhatia, J.H.Bhatia, J.H.Bhatia, JJ JJ JJ DATED DATED DATED : 22nd April, 2009 : 22nd April, 2009 : 22nd April, 2009 P.C. 1. The facts need not be set out. The parties are in agreement that the issue is squarely covered by the decision in Mafatlal Industries Ltd vs Union of Mafatlal Industries Ltd vs Union of Mafatlal Industries Ltd vs Union of India India India 1997 (87) ELT 247. 1997 (87) ELT 247. 1997 (87) ELT 247. In the light of the above, rule is discharged. No order as to costs. { J.H.Bhatia, J } J.H.Bhatia, J } J.H.Bhatia, J } { F.I.Rebello, J } F.I.Rebello, J } F.I.Rebello, J }