IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2010 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 306 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.8157/2002 Dated 19/12/2003 .................... PETITIONER: --------------- BHADRESH V.MEHTA, S/O.VASANTRAI MEHTA, PARTNER, M/S.BHADRESH TRADING CORPORATION,MUMBAI, AGED OF M/S/SURICE TRADING PVT, LTD.,101, CECIL STREET, 11-09 TONG ENG.BUILDING, SINGAPOER-069533. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.BHARATHAN RESPONDENT: --------------- DR.K.A.RETHEESH MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA STATE CASHEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,CASHEW HOUSE, P.B.NO.13,KOLLAM., BY ADV. SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... C.O.C. No.306 of 2010 .................................................................... Dated this the 17th day of March, 2010. JUDGMENT In view of the judgment in the Writ Petition, there is no scope for entertaining contempt because this court in the judgment has not stated what was the amount payable by the respondent to the petitioner in the Contempt application. Consequently Contempt is closed leaving freedom to the petitioner to claim whatever is the balance due from the respondent Corporation. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms