1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU WRIT PETITION No. ‘LO l4/0F 2006 5 . Shiv @mf, S/o- Shri Reshmlal, Aged PETITIONER: About—20 Years, R/o— Village 8r) Post— ‘ Saragbundiya , Thesil- Kartala, Distt‘ ‘ ‘ Korba (C‘GJ VERSUS RESPONDENT ($15 1. State of Chhattisgarh t Through it’s Secretary Department of Revenue D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Collector Distt. Korba (C.G} RECEIVED—COP?) Slib DiViSional offlcer (Revenue) / r \A k &l a é Land Acquisition Officer CLERK to A. G. BILAEPUR . ’ Distt. Korba (0G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION / ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE. f# \'_V' <{; . R i # 2. Collector Distt, Kama (cg) . 3. Sub Divisiona! Ofticer (Reyenue) I Land Acuqis’ition omcer Distt. Korba (0.6.) Writ Petition No;1027 OF 2006 WWW-w Egjv’mgjggg M : About Piyarelal, v 42 slo' Years, Late R/o Shri Vil‘age<Khoodal Bhugdev, Aged Post— Saragbundiya, Thesil —— Kartala, Distt. Korlia (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State oi Chhattisgarh Through it‘s Secretary Department of Revenue D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector Dis’tt. Korba (C.G.) 3. Sub Divisiona! Officer (Revenue) / Land Acuqisition Officer Distt. Korba (C.G.) Present: Shri Vinay Pandey, learned counsel for the petltloners. Shrl Utkarsh Verma, learned counsel for the respondents. . \\ ORAL ORDER (Passed ‘on 1s“ November, 2006) The grievance of the petitioners is that though they made an applications on 19/7/2005 under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act‘ 1894 seeking reference to the claim to the civil Court for higher compensation in respect of his land acquired for a public purpose, the second respondent, the Collector, has not yet referred the'applications to the civil Court. (2) Havinp heard the learned counsel for the parties, i dispose of the writ petitions directing the second respondent to refer the applications of the petitioners to the jurisdictional civil Court under Section 18 of the Act, if the application filed by the petitioners are within the time prescribed under the Actand subject to the petitioners performing other formalities, if any, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of \ a copy of this order. No costs. Sdl— Chief Justice