IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 5406 of 2008 Between: Pokala Appala Raju S/o late Venkaiah r/o D. No. 45-47-61 Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of A.P., rep by District collector, Visakhapatnam. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam. 3 The Tahsildar, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, visakhaptnam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of mandamus or any other approprite writ or direction declaring the action pf the 3rd respondent in not considering the residering the representation dated 09-01-2008 and not furnishing a copy of the order that has been passed by the 3rd respondent as illegal, aarbitraary and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to coonsider the representation of the petitioner dated 09-01-2008 for conforming the assigment of the land in sy.No.369 admeasuring an exentof Ac 3.25 cents of Kapuluppadu village ,Bheemunipatnam Mandal Visakhapatnam and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.O.MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 5406 of 2008 Order: The only grievance of the petitioner is that he made representation dated 09.01.2008 to the 3rd respondent, namely the Tahsildar, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, for confirmation of assignment of land in an extent of Ac.3.25 cents in Survey No.369 of Kapuluppadu village, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, but till date no action thereon had been taken. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: The 3rd respondent, namely the Tahsildar, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, is directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 09.01.2008 of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 13.03.2008 Ksr/Nsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRT}