^ B^Qi BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT_QFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (0 N0. _TSJ^ / 2011 PETITIONER ^^& ^y'^^ ^^^^ <' ^^y^^ ^l^r^,..-^r>' '^^\..-"'"' ^giSPONDENTS ^ ^' Ashok Kumar, S/o. Late Shri Banarsi Das, Aged ^bout 48 years, '^c^/- < R/o. Patthalgoan, Lailunga, District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ^' 2. Nagar Panchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) IFS- 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 2260FJ1LE CQNSITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER RESPONDENTS HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 N0. 7386 OF 2011 Ashok Kumar Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others <^€ (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Sourabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Pane! Lawyerforthe State/ respondents No.1 & 3. Shri Arun Sao, Advocate for the respondent No.2. ORDER (Passed on this Q8m day of-December, 2011) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugned notice dated 25.11.2011 (Annexure P/1), for demolition of the alleged unauthorized construction raised by the petitioner, has been withdrawn by the respondent authoriti^. Thus, nothing survives for adjudication and this petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel appearing for other side do not controvert the above submission. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok