IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH : HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH (14TH) DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN Present: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY SA No.1 of 2003 Between: Matta Surya Rao (died) & others … Appellants And: Matta Paparao & others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY SA No.1 of 2003 JUDGMENT: The third appellant and first respondent are present. The other appellants and other respondents are represented by the learned counsel appearing on both sides by way of special Vakalath. Learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel for the respondents are present. The 3rd respondent and first respondent have stated that they have entered into compromise as set out in the compromise petition. The terms of compromise are read over and explained to them and they admitted them to be true and correct. In the circumstances, the compromise is recorded as per the terms as set out in the petition i.e., SAMP No.3090 of 2010. Compromise is recorded as per orders in SA MP No.3090 of 2010 and the appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise and the copy of the compromise decree be attached to the original decree in OS No.371 of 1989 and also to the second appeal. No order as to costs. ___________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Date: 14.03.2011 bss