Crl. Misc. No. M-32108 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-32108 of 2011 Date of Decision: December 15, 2011 Parwinder Kumar …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.M.S. Sachdev, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. Mr.P.S. Dhillon, Advocate for the complainant. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner seeks the concession of pre-arrest bail in a case registered against him on the allegation of Surinder Singh that a sum of Rs.4 lacs has been obtained by the petitioner besides a sum of Rs.1.50 lacs for sending the complainant to England. During the course of enquiry by ACP (North), Jalandhar, an affidavit of the complainant was produced by the petitioner to show that a Crl. Misc. No. M-32108 of 2011 [2] compromise had been arrived at between the parties and payment of Rs.4 lacs had been made by the petitioner to the complainant. Though the signatures of the complainant were found to be existing on the affidavit but on inquiry, it was found that it had not been attested by the notary as claimed by the petitioner. An opportunity was given to the petitioner to amicably settle the dispute. It appears that the petitioner has not been able to produce any material establishing that a sumo f Rs.4 lacs had been returned by the petitioner to the complainant. Without expression of any opinion regarding the validity of the contents of the alleged affidavit of Surinder Singh, complainant, it is sufficient to observe that no extraordinary exceptional circumstances exist to grant the concession of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. This order will not prejudice the rights of the petitioner to approach this Court again in case the matter is amicably settled with the complainant. December 15, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE