a^ite'S'iii;ii1" ^^/ <CTO IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Ct No^^-:H-/2006 PETITIONER .\»k-: (^*X'n ^-% •••"-'?^^' ^Rupau Singh Dhruwa, aged about 35 years, S/o Shri Padum singh 4 Dhruwa,R/o Village Dheba, Tahsil Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS R'ESPONDENTS ^ ^'^ o^ \Wi S^'o' y \Q' 1f>. ^ ^' The State of Chhattisgarh, Thrpugh Secretary, Forest Departm.ent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2, Union of India, through Secretary Forest Departinent, New Delhj 3. Forest Range Officer, Baranwapara (AbhyaranJ, Distt. Raipur 4. Divisional forest Officer, General Forest Division, Raipur WRIT^ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 ffTHdt $b*<l<sh ^si^WvPf, w<Kwis,Kmwy. ^r€c~)- T^^jss. ^ 200 -1> W^\ 4dcb (yit^q^) Sn^T^iTfeH; TOTSlRWsbHlf waiw dfer sn^T 12.10.: Shri Parag Kotecha, counsel Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocal on advance copy. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, c\ India on advance copy. Arguments heard. Order dictated as follov^: 12.10.2006) SUNIL KUMARSINHA. J. By way of this writ petiti^n Constitution of India, the petition^r, directions to the State authorities constitution and election of the with the said prayer, he has also pr^s schedul^ the date for election of th|s should also be quashed. The subject matter of this Wj the subject mattere of WP No.55^4 have been heard and dismissed by Learned counsel for the petif State/respondents does riot dispute In view of the above, fhis Wr|t stage on the grounds and reasons s|t in W.P. No.5524/2006 and W.P. No.l <tii'iilci'ifl-i ii>itiT^'')Wt<Ri^i< ^? Stf^IT SlliST 'or the petitioner. B for the State/respondents No.1, 3 & 4 unse! for respondent No.2/ Union of filed under Artfcle 226/227 of the r, has prayed for issuance of certain |o formulate the rules pertaining to the m^mbere of Van Suraksha Sanwti. Along r^yed that the memo Annexure P-3, which ils office bearers of Van Suratete Sam/fr', frit Petjtion is exactly identical to ihat of 55^4/20(» and W.P. No.5525/2006, which fris Court vide ordere dated 10.10.2006. tioner as wetl as leamed counsel for the fhis factual position. Wr|t Petition is ateo dismissed at the motion |ated in orders dated 10.10.2006 passed ..PS25/2006. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ^-1'^t- I.l.u'. r