..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2375 OF 2008 Mohammed Ayub Choudhary and 3 Ors. ..Applicants. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. ... Mr.A.M.Saraogi, Adv. for the applicants. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for the State. ... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 18th July, 2008. DATED : 18th July, 2008. DATED : 18th July, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicants and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.160 of 2008 of Nagpada police station. The said case is mainly under Section 326 of IPC. 3. The injured witness has specifically stated that the applicants came armed with weapons and they assaulted him. Applicant No.1 was armed with stick and applicant Nos.2 to 4 were armed with iron rods. Several injuries were caused to the ..(2).. injured witness including fracture of the nose, injury to the eye etc. 4. In my view, the material collected by the prosecution in the present case is such as to point out an accusing finger towards the present applicants. The Apex Court has observed in the decision of Directorate of Enforcement Vs. Directorate of Enforcement Vs. Directorate of Enforcement Vs. P.V.Prabhakar Rao, P.V.Prabhakar Rao, P.V.Prabhakar Rao, reported in 1997 SCC (Cri.) 978 1997 SCC (Cri.) 978 1997 SCC (Cri.) 978 that when the material gathered by the prosecution is such as to point out an accusing finger towards the accused, it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. Hence I do not think that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. Application for anticipatory bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)