1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.06.2011 CORAM THE HONOURBLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P(MD).No.4770 of 2011 1 M. VEERUCHINNU 2 P.PONNAMMAL 3 D. GNANAPRAKASAM 4 C. GANESAN 5 T. RUKKUMANI 6 S. VEERACHAMY 7 J. BOOMADEVI 8 M. KAVITHA 9 M. PODHUMANI 10 S. PAPPA 11 A. KANNAN 12 A. KRISHNASAMY 13 M. EASWARI 14 P. MUTHURAJ 15 M. VIJAYA 16 R. RAJESWARI 17 P. SUBBAMMAL 18 M. MARIAPPAN 19 V. LEELA 20 P. JEYARAMAN 21 M. RAJENDRAN 22 M. SELVARAJ 23 K. KARUPPACHAMY ... Petitioners Vs 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR THENI DT. THENI. 2 THE TAHSILDAR THENI TALUK THENI. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to survey and demarcate the land bearing Survey No.219/1E1 219/1E2 219/1E3 and 219/2C in Oonchampatti Village, Theni District by taking into account of the petitioners representation dated 14-01-2011. For petitioner : Mr.A.Rajini For Respondents : Mr.TR.Janardhanam ***** https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 ORDER The petitioners contended that they purchased the lands bearing survey Nos.219/1E1, 219/1E2, 219/1E3 and 219/2C in Oonchampatti Village, Theni District. They are all adjacent owners of the properties and their survey numbers are very adjacent. They have jointly filed this Writ Petition. Their only grievance is that their lands have not been surveyed in spite of their request and demand. Earlier, on 24.12.2010, they remitted amount for surveying the land in question along with a representation dated 14.01.2011. Since it has not been done so, they have filed the present Writ Petition. When a notice was ordered, they made a further representation to the respondents on 27.04.2011 seeking to consider their representation and pass orders for surveying and demarcating the land of the petitioners. 2. The learned Additional Government Pleader would contend that they have made a representation only on 27.04.2011 and due to the election and subsequent results, it has not been taken up so far. Furthermore, they would also contend that in the earlier representation they themselves would admit that there is a rival claim in respect of the property who is trying to disturb the possession in question, namely, one Karuppa Thevar son of Chinna Mayandi Thevar. However, he has not been impleaded as a party in the Writ Petition. In any way, the respondents are willing to consider the representation of the petitioner after giving due notice to the parties concerned. 3. Taking into consideration the limited request of the petitioners, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.04.2011 after giving necessary notice as well as opportunities of hearing to Karuppa Thevar son of Chinna Mayandi Thevar and other interested parties, if any, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of five months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. The Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl. Side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S) To 1.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR THENI DISTRICT, THENI. 2.THE TAHSILDAR THENI TALUK, THENI. + 1 cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR No.17408 + 1 cc to Mr.A.Rajini, Advocate, SR No.17271 W.P(MD).No.4770 of 2011 06.06.2011 ssm RJ/27.6.11 2p/5c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/