G^" i ^ 0-^> ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAS PU R fC.G.) WRIT PETITION fS) N0. U(TO^ 1 2009 PETITIONER ^-:^ ..^^^•f'" ^.:----""" RESPONDENTS V.D. Mishra, Son of Satyadev Mishra, aged about 65 years, Near Railway Station, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Director,PubIic Instruction C.G., Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) / 3. Joint Director, Public Instruction C.G., Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4. District Education Officer, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) WRITPETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ -HC—78 "s^ ^t'Mi<n^,^ti1'<-i<i(o, [si(ni-H^< _^_ LJ^H) LjQQLffo -WTFiT ^?N?"---^-f-^y--/-':-':--^[ ioo 3:n^r 'sra^ (li°il^<^) <3?T^T^ ft^ioh TT^TT 3>TT^T$F?ri^ [I : ••- '^nw1?rfi'n ^TT^T SB s Hon*ble Shri ManEndra IMohaja Shrivastava, J. 28-06-2011 Shri Anup Majumdar, t|or from Shri P.P. Sahu, counsel Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel) Leanied counsel for th4 that relief prayed for in fhi^ promotion has been aGcepted |by been passed on 17th January,) promotion. He fi.uther submit^ passed, the benelits have petitioner, as the higher the pay aiTears and pension nbr paid. Leamed counsel for thd has alreldy been pa.ssed on l' been made in the retum tha.| petitioner would be llxed^ thereatt.er the same would be In view of the submissit parties^ uo fruitfi.il purpose| petition pendmg when thej c?>i^f<n<fli 'W^Tf ^f 'fe^i' <M<^K ^^tRR^H^T 4dvocate appears imder instructions fhe petitiouer* |La\vyer for flie State, petitioner at tae outset submittecl d^ petition regarding grant of scale the department and an order.has [2011 by the Director, granting scale t^ that even though orders have been ^.ctually not been accrued to the fixed has not taken place and jof the petitioner has not been tlxed pay-|scale calculated petitioner siibinitted fhat the order |'thJanuary, 2011 and statementhas fhe pay arrears aad pension of the and thereafter re-lixed and |)aid to tlie petitioner. {>ns made by learned counsei for tlie would be ser^ed in keepmg this respondents have passed order^ ;^l;y .,.N"^ I I "'f i " XI-HC—78 'STT^T ^T ^T^ TT^Tl W^T'^'RT^' Praveen -S^f ^i^Kn^, ^tll<H^(o, [^crtl^{^< ifl^rctT^^w •^200 3TT^?F TT?R)' (11?^<BI^) ^nw ^rftn ^T^T -^- <=M^f<y1^1l "RT^if ^ 'fe^t <M^I< ^3tRR3^T redressing fhe grievance of ijetitioner. However, as tJrie petitioner has alreldy retired fonn se| release payments, which the| rvice, respondents may do well to petitioner is entitled, if not already released, m fhe light oforder|dated 17th January, 2011 (Annexure R-l), as expeditiously as poss|ible. With the aforesaid oljaservations, the petition is imally disposed of. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Jude I-