IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47906 of 2008 MD.AZAD son of Md. Tipu, resident of village Banki, P.S.Rupouli,District Purina … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner:Shri Pramaod Kumar Mallick For the State:Shri Dashrath Mehta,APP ----------- 3. 3.2.2009 Heard. The case has been registered under some bailable Section of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 9/5 of the World Life Protection Act which appears non-bailable. The contention is that the name of the petitioner was not divulged by the villagers who had assembled at the scene of the occurrence and it was divulged by a co- accused accused Md. Lalu, Learned Additional Public Prosecutor wanted to justify the implication of the petitioner by branding the statement as an assault. The Court believes, it could be decided by the trial Court and no opinion could be given on that so as not to prejudicing the trial of the petitioner. The petitioner has remained in 2 custody since 30.6.2008 and considering that, let the above named petitioner be released on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia in Rupouli P.S.Case No.80 of 2007 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the petitioner shall remain physically present on all dates on which the court requires him, 2. that any attempt by the petitioner to tamper the evidence or bully the witnesses could be sufficient for the court being satisfied about it to assume that this order had not been passed by this Court and it shall take steps for committing the petitioner to custody after canceling his bond. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)