IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. 394-M of 2004 DATE OF DECISION : 27.05.2008 Harvinder Pal Kaur and others .... PETITIONERS Versus State of Punjab ..... RESPONDENT CORAM :-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Mehardeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. * * * KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners have been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. In the present case, evidence has not started. Learned Judicial Magistrate has stated that there are specific allegations against the petitioners. At this stage, counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners are the relations of the husband of the complainant. The personal appearance of the petitioners was exempted by this court. Petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned trial court to conclude the trial within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. However, personal appearance of the petitioners shall remain exempted before the learned trial court, subject to Crl. Misc. No. 394-M of 2004 -2- their filing an undertaking that they shall cause appearance as and when required by the learned trial court. May 27, 2008 (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA) ndj JUDGE