1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8694 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 8694 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 8694 OF 2004 Shri. Hariba Rama Metkari ... Petitioner Versus Shri. Dnyanu Bhau Metkari and Ors. Respondents Mr. R.S. Ghadge for Petitioner. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO,J. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO,J. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO,J. DATED : OCTOBER 19, 2005 DATED : OCTOBER 19, 2005 DATED : OCTOBER 19, 2005 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. . The scheme was finalized in the year 1979. The Petitioner applied for correction in the year 1991. Even considering Section 31A that had to be done within reasonable time. It has been done after more than three years. Hence, this will not be a fit case to interfere in exercise extra ordinary jurisdiction with the interim order passed by the Minister of State for Revenue. If the Petitioners are entitled to file suit, it will be open to file suit and the decision in the suit will have its consequential effects. With the above observations, petition stands dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. 2 (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)