IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 11TH DECEMBER 2006 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 RP.No. 1069 of 2006(H) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.11627/2006 .................... : REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5 IN THE W.P. ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR. 5. THE GEOLOGIST, DIST. OFFICE, DEPT. OF MINING & GEOLOGY, THRISSUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENTS: PETITIONERS & R6 IN THE W.P.: ------------------------------------------ 1. C.K.PAULY, S/O.KOCHAPPAN, CHANDY HOUSE, RAMAVARMAPURAM POST, THRISSUR. 2. T.S.SIVARAMAN, S/O.SANKARANKUTTY, THAIVALAPPIL HOUSE, RAMAVARMAPURAM POST, THRISSUR. 3. CORPORATION OF THRISSUR, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` R.P. No. 1069 OF 2006 IN W.P. (C) No. 11627 OF 2006 H ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 11th day of December, 2006 O R D E R The State has come up in review against my judgment dated 21.4.2006 on the ground that although Ext.P1 application is addressed to respondents 2 to 6, the direction was to the 1st respondent to dispose of Ext.P1. A reading of my judgment itself would show that the fact that Ext.P1 is filed before respondents 2 to 6 has been noted by me, and it is thereafter on being satisfied that it would be better that the 1st respondent disposes of the same, I had consciously directed the 1st respondent to dispose of the matter. This is quite evident from my judgment and as such the review petition has no merits. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, I extend the time for disposal of Ext.P1 by the 1st respondent in the writ petition by one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE) aks