IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31726 of 2010 KAMESHWAR MAHTO & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 27.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Loan if any was advanced and its part remained to return is denied. Theft is said ornamental to reply a complaint by petitioner no.1. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case let petitioners No.1. Kameshwar Mahto 2. Sanjit Mahto and 3. Pankaj Kumar Mahto, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Subhash Chandra, J.M., Supaul, in Complaint Case No.870/04 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438( 2 ) of Cr.P.C. Anilkr.sinha (Mandhata Singh,J.)