1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.254 of 2007 Mostt. Nirmala Devi, wife of late Ashok Singh, resident of Village Beyapur, P.S. Maner, District Patna Plaintiff….. Petitioner. Versus Ramnandan Singh, son of late Bhaihasan Singh, resident of Village Beyapur, P.S. Maner, District Patna. …Plaintiff-Opposite Party. ------ For the Petitioner : ……..Mr. Anil KumarDwivedi, Advocate For the Opp. Party ……..Mr. B.N. P. Singh, Advocate. --------- 02/ 09.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the sole petitioner and learned counsel for the sole opposite party. 2. This civil revision has been filed by the defendant-petitioner challenging order dated 02.11.2006, by which the learned Munsif, Danapur allowed the prayer of the plaintiff-opposite party for amendment of his plaint in Title Suit No.07 of 2004 3. The aforesaid suit was filed by the plaintiff- opposite party for eviction of the defendant-petitioner on the ground of his bona fide personal requirement as well as default in payment of rent by the defendant. However, before the hearing of the trial suit commenced, the plaintiff filed an application dated 11.05.2006 under the provision of Order IV Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure for making minor amendments in paragraphs no.13, 17, 19 and 20 of the plaint, whereas, the value of the suit was sought to be enhanced in paragraph no.21 thereof and some addition was also sought to be made in relief no.1 with regard to title of the plaintiff and 2 non-title of the defendant. In addition to that, paragraph no.18(A) was sought to be added in the plaint stating that the defendant had no right, title and interest in the suit property, but he is illegally claiming it although it is part and parcel of the sale-deed of the plaintiff. 4. From the impugned order of the learned court below, it transpires that it has considered the entire matter in detail and has come to the specific conclusion that the amendments sought for were quite legal and proper and the defendant would not suffer any loss. 5. This Court does not find any illegality or jurisdictional error in the impugned order of the learned court below and, accordingly, this civil revision is dismissed. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )