IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.81 of 2007 KAMAL PRAKASH . Versus AKHILENDRA PRASAD . ----------- 9 30.6.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the Opposite party. Petitioner has filed the review application for reviewing the order dated 14.11.2006 passed in Civil Revision No. 1379 of 2005 simply on the ground that in absence of the petitioner the order was passed. On perusal of the order, I find that the merit of the case has been considered. The reason for dismissing the Civil revision application was that for setting aside the same order earlier miscellaneous appeal had been filed by this petitioner and his father which was dismissed vide order dated 15.4.2005. Since second appeal is not maintainable, as such order passed in second Misc. Appeal by petitioner was rejected and against the rejection order Revision application was filed. I do not find that it is a fit case for review of the order as considering legality of order, Revision 2 application was dismissed. Accordingly, Civil Review application is dismissed. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar