HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (2271 N0. 3016 OF 2011 PBTITIONBRS DEFENDANTS 1. 2. VBRSUS RESPOMDBBT PLAINTIFF Rajesh Raratekc agcd 37 yrs Rakesh Rainteke aged 21 yrs Both S/o Shri Cfahedilal r/o Near Bajraag Pancbayat Maadir TaJapara Bilaspur CG. Smt. Pushpalata Ramteke aged 38 yrs, w/o Shri Munna Maxukpuri r/o Near Bajraag Pauchayat Mandir Talapara Bilaspur CG Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspiu- CG. WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLB 227 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (S5 :Hon''bIe nar. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Anurag Dayal Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri PrafuU N. Bharat, Advocate for the respondent. ORDBR (Passed on 03/11/2011) By this petition under Article 227 of fhe Constitution of India petitioners have chaUcnged the tegality aad propriety of the order dated 15/4/2011 passed by 8th Civil Judge Class-2, Bilaspur C.G. in Case No. 122-A/2010 whereby appUcation ffled under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act for permitting fhe party for adducing secondaiy evidence has been dismissed on the ground that original will in existence therefore no pennissioa for secondaiy evidence caa be graated. As per otder impugned it is not disputed that wffl is in existence arid is withm the possession of opposite party i.e. plaintiff and it can be wiU produced by catling plaintiff along with said docuxuent therefore by disuaissiag applicatioa Coiirt below has not comniitted any iUegaUty reqiuring any interfenence, wifh fhese observations, petition stands disposed of No order as to costs. Sdl- ^s ^af^ • ~^tee