IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 9TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 18TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 22016 of 2010(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. MOINDEENKUTTY MADANI, S/O.ALAVIKUTTY, KANJIRAPPALLY HOUSE, PULPATTA, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. FATHIMA, W/O.MOIDEENKUTTY MADANI, KANJIRAPPALLY HOUSE, PULPATTA, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE SUB REGISTRAR, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 505. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANJERI POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 121. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 22016 of 2010 B ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 9th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T Writ petition was filed mainly for a direction to the first respondent not to refuse registration of documents executed in respect of the properties owned by the petitioner. In the affidavit in IA.15448/2010, it is stated that the sale has not materialised. Therefore, the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Now, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to accept basic tax in respect of his properties. For that, petitioner should seek relief against the Tahsildar and Village Officer and not against the respondents in this writ petition. Therefore, the relief sought for cannot be granted in the writ petition. Writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks