1 CP-94-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 94 OF 2011 Shri Sahebrao Vishwambhar Waghmare ... Petitioner (Org. Plaintiff) Vs. Village Development Officer, & Anr. ... Respondents (Org. Defendants) Mr. S.D.Patil,Advocate, for the petitioner. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 8th June, 2011. P.C. 1. The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that inspite of the injunction order passed by the trial Court on 28.4.2010 not to dispossess the petitioner from the suit property, the respondents, who are the defendants in R.C.S. No.491/2010, have demolished the premises and dispossessed the petitioner and thus committed contempt of the Court. He admits that the petitioner has already filed an application under Order XXXIX Rule 2-A of C.P.C. In view of this, I refuse to entertain the present Contempt Petition. However, the learned 4th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Barshi is hereby directed to expedite the hearing of the application under Order XXXIX Rule 2-A of C.P.C. and dispose of the same as early as possible, preferably within three months from production of the copy of this order. 2 CP-94-11.sxw Petition stands disposed of accordingly. 2. Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)