IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 5TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 14TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 16333 of 2009(J) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ SATHAR ISLAND SAMRAKSHNA SAMITHI, SATHAR ISLAND, MOOTHAKUNNAM P.O., REP. BY ITS CONVENOR, SELMON P.O., AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. LATE OUSO, PARAPILLY HOUSE, SATHAR ISLAND, MOOTHAKUNNAM P.O. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDNET OF POLICE, RURAL ALUVA, 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADAKKKEKARA POLICE STATION. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADAKKEKKARA POLICE STATION. 4. ADAM ABOOBACKER SAIT MANAGING TRUSTEE, ABDUL SATHAR HAJEE, MOOSA SAIT DHARMASTHAPANAM, CHITTOOR ROAD, PULLEPADY, ERNAKULAM. * ADDL. R5:- T.P. GOPALAKRISHNAN, S/O PADMANABHAN, PRANAVAM HOUSE, T.D. ROAD, THRIKKANARVATTAM, ERNAKULAM - 682035. *[ADDL. R5 IS IMPLEADED AS ADDL. RESPONDENT NO.5 AS PER ORDER ON I.A.6185/10 DT. 05/09/11] ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS SRI.P.S.YOUSUF SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. FOR ADDL.R5 SMT.POOJA SURENDRAN FOR ADDL.R5 SRI.GANESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/09/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 16333 of 2009(J) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXTS EXT.P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 06/06/09. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ W. P. C. No.16333 of 2009 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 5th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J In this Writ Petition seeking directions against what is described as police harassment at the instance of the 4th respondent, the learned Government Pleader submitted on the basis of instructions that civil dispute is pending between the petitioner and the 4th respondent in respect of the property in question. Sri.Ganesh, the learned counsel for the additional 5th respondent submitted that the additional 5th respondent is the present owner of the property. As it is revealed that some disputes are pending in respect of the property in question, we are of the view that the police should not intervene in the above dispute and should leave the dispute over the property to be settled by this Court which is already in seizin of the matter in a Civil Revision Petition. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE C. K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE kns/- -2-