IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-23333 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: August 08, 2011 Balwinder Singh …..Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.L.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) In this petition under section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner, who is complainant, has raised a grievance that FIR was registered way back on 7.3.2010, but investigation has not been completed till now. It appears that after the petitioner filed a complaint, he approached this court with the grievance that a DDR had been registered about the alleged occurrence and investigating agency had failed to register an FIR. A direction was thus, issued by a co-ordinate Bench in Crl.Misc.No.M-8721 of 2010 on March 23, 2010 directing that action be taken on DDR dated 12.2.2010 within a period of one month. As a result, the FIR was registered and investigation ensued. The petitioner is now dissatisfied with the investigation and seeks a specific direction for presentation of challan. Heard. Crl.Misc.No.M-23333 of 2011 - 1 - I am of the considered view that there is nothing on record to show that investigation has not been conducted by the investigating agency promptly. Learned counsel has neither been able to point out any defect nor has been able to show that statements of concerned witnesses were not recorded by the investigating agency. Needless to observe that investigating agency is at liberty to form an opinion and submit a final report in accordance with law. On the other hand, it appears that petitioner has repeatedly approached this court in inherent jurisdiction seeking very general directions. The instant petition appears to be totally frivolous. The same is hereby dismissed with Rs.10,000/- as costs, to be remitted to Punjab State Legal Services Authority. August 08, 2011 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE