IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.159 of 2008 MOHIT YADAV ………Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. SAUDAGAR YADAV 3. LALO YADAV 4. SUKAN YADAV 5. HARIHAR YADAV 6. JHAPSI YADAV 7. RAM SEWAK YADAV 8. RAM SAGAR YADAV 9. BHOGINDRA YADAV 10. RAJDEO YADAV 11. JAIYSI LAL YADAV 12. BINDESHWAR YADAV 13. LOTAN YADAV 14. DHANESHWAR YADAV 15. YOGENDRA YADAV 16. KAMESHWAR YADAV 17. RAM PADARATH YADAV 18. CHANDESHWAR YADAV 19. PARMANAND YADAV 20. RAM PRABODHY YADAV 21. RAM CHARAN YADAV 22. RAM PRIT YADAV 23. SHEIKH AFTAB 24. SHEIKH MAHTAB ……Opposite parties. ----------- 3. 25.11.2008. This Cr. Revision has been filed against the order of acquittal dated 18.9.2007 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (FTC- III), Darbhanga in Sessions Trial No. 135 of 1991. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that court below has not properly appreciated oral as well as documentary evidence. He has wrongly acquitted all the accused persons on the ground of non-examination of I. O. and doctor. Considered the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned judgment particularly paragraph - 2 - 16 of the judgment. On perusal of paragraph 16 of the judgment, it would appear that neither I. O. nor the doctor has been examined. No plausible explanation for their non-examination has been offered. There is enmity between the parties. All witnesses examined were found to be inimical terms with the accused persons. Not a single independent witness has been examined by the prosecution. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances, I am of the view that learned counsel for the petitioner has not made out any case for interference in the impugned judgment. Accordingly, this Cr. Revision is dismissed at the admission stage itself. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)