C.Review No. 44/2009 21.10.2009Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner-applicant. Mr. R.M. Bisht, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Dy. Advocate General, for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4. The petitioner is aggrieved by the last portion of the judgment whereby we have directed that he should complete his normal tenure at Jarol, District Mandi. This order was passed keeping in view the fact that we found that the petitioner has managed to stay in and around his native place right from his initial recruitment in service. We find no reason to review this order. The review petition is accordingly dismissed. (Deepak Gupta),J (Surinder Singh),J October 21, 2009 (cm)