IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19660 of 2011 Jagmal Kumar son of Sri Ramnath Singh, resident of village Dudhami, Post-Huska, P.S. Indrapuri, District-Rohtas …Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India through the Inspector General of Police Force, CRPF, Bihar Sector, HQ, Patna 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, CRPF, Mokamaghat, Patna 3. The Deputy Commandant, Group Centre, CRPF, Mokamaghat, Patna …Respondents ----------- 02. 14.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Solicitor General for the Respondent-Union of India and its officials. Petitioner was an applicant for the post of Constable/GD (Male) in Central Reserve Police Force (for short ‘CRPF’). It is the petitioner’s case that he qualified at physical eligibility test followed by written test whereafter he was subjected to medical fitness test by Medical Board. On such examination, he was declared unsuitable/unfit for the reasons that petitioner was suffering from hydrocele. The aforesaid communication is Annexure-2. Petitioner was required to file appeal thereagainst for subjecting him to review medical test within a particular time-frame. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits with reference to Annexure-3 that he obtained a medical fitness certificate and filed memo of appeal together with required postal orders of Rs.25/-. The respondents by communication dated 16.8.2011 (Annexure-4) informed that the appeal could not be considered for want of IPOs (fee). Learned counsel states 2 that details of IPO(s) were set out in memo of appeal itself. He has enclosed the counterfoils of those IPOs annexed as Annexure-5. Learned counsel has taken a very fair stand that if the appeal has not been considered on this ground alone then the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish IPO(s) worth Rs.25/- once again provided the authority concerned considers his appeal and subject him to review medical fitness test by Review Medical Board. It is contended that a representation in this regard has already been filed which has not been disposed of as a result whereof the petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court. Mr. Ahsan, learned Assistant Solicitor General, on going through pleadings made in the writ petition, states that the matter can be disposed of directing the Deputy Inspector General of Police (respondent no.2) to consider his representation and take a final decision thereon in accordance with law.. Having heard the parties and on going through pleadings on record, this Court is satisfied that present application be disposed of by the following order:- Let the petitioner file a fresh representation before the DIG (respondent no.2) within three weeks from today along with a copy of this order whereafter the said respondent shall consider the case of the petitioner as also the stand taken before this Court and take appropriate decision in accordance with law as quickly as possible preferably within two 3 weeks of filing of the representation. Needless to observe that if the petitioner files fresh IPO(s) worth Rs.25/-, the respondent shall consider arranging for a fresh Review Medical Board for the petitioner and thereafter takes a final decision in accordance with law. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )