HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR PETITIONERS 1. Smt. Pushpa Kale, Widow of Lats Shyam Rao Kale, aged about 60 years Rajeev Kale, son of Late‘Shyam Rao Kale, aged about 40 years, RESPONDENTS Sandeep Kale, son of Late Shyam Rao Kale, aged about 38 yeaxs, All residents of Budhapara, Raipur Versus Smt. Indu Baj Supekar, widow of Late P.G. Supekar, msident of E-2/295, Arera Colony, Bhopal, through her Attorney Shrl Shashikant Supekar, son of Late RG. Supekar, resident of E- 2/ 295, Arera Colony, Bhopal. Murh' Verma, son of Shri Kodan Velma, resident of Village Seom', P.O. Godhi, Tehsil Amng, District Raipur (C.G.) Plemlal Dhidi, son of Shri Jagtu Dhidi, resident of Village Nakti, P.O. Mana Camp, Dishict Raipur Thaag Lal Dhidi, son of Shri Jagtu Dhidi, resident of village Nakti, P.O. Mana Camp, Distt. Raipur State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, Raipur Aggearance : Shn' Ajit smgh, Counsel for the petiaonexs. Shn‘ Sumesh Bajaj, counsel for respondent no. 1. None for Iespondent no.2. Shrl Anurag Dayal, counsel for respondents no.3 85 4. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govt Advocate, for the State] respondent no.5. Writ Petition (C) No. 175/2007 K 2 W.P(C).No. 175/2007 1 z é ORAL ORDER {13.02.2008} SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J, Heani. Learned counsel for the petih'oners seeks permission to withdraw this petition, So far as prayer for withdrawal is concerned, that is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. However, Shri Sumesh Bajaj, counsel for respondent no.1 vehemently submits that it is a frivolous petition in which the stay was obtained by the pen'tioners by pleading Wlong facts. Since the petitioners themselves are Withdmwing this petition and the withdrawal is not opposed, prayer is allowed. The petition is dismissed, as withdrawn. In View of the above, interim order granted on 22.2.2007 stands vacated. Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Rao