HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRrTPETmONfT) No. 1753of2009 AtiUt PETmONER : Sarojben D. Patel a proprietory concem Prop. Sarojben Patel W/o Dineshbhai Patel aged about 59 years, resident ofHouse No. 36/569, Byron Liiies, Raipur (C.G) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. Deputy Conmiissioner Commereial Tax Vamjyi Kar Bliavati, Civil Liaes Raipur. 2. Assistant Commercial Tax Qfficer, Circle III, Raipur(C.G.) 3. State of Chhattisgarfa through Secretary, Department of Commereial Tax D.K.S. Mantralaya Bhavan Raipur (C.G.) WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satlsh K. Asnlhotri, J. Preseni.: Shri Neelabh Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Alok Bakshi, Goverament Advocate for the State/respondents. QRALQRDER (Passed on 22nd day of April, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submft:s fhat at the relevatit time the petitioner was not having the Form No. E-l in her possession. Now the petitioner is in possession ofthe Fonn No. E-I. Ilierefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petitian with liberty to make an application to the concemed authority, explaining the delay and non-famishing ofthe Form No. E-l at the rejevant time, which may be considered and decided by the concemed authority an its own merits, in accordance with law. 2. Shri Bakshi submits that if an aiylication, as stated above, with explanation for delay and reasons fer not producing the Fonn No. E-l is made to the concerned authority, fhe same shaH be considered aad decided on its own merits, in aecordanee with law. . 3. In view ofthe foregoing, aceording to leamed couusel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives iflthismatterfor adjudication. —*- 4. In view offhe above, tbe petition stands disposed of with fhe above- stated liberty. Satish K. Agnihotri ~~~ ^ Judge