THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN W.P.M.P.No.5898 of 2005 in W.P.No.36776 of 1998 ORDER: This W.P.M.P. is filed for being mentioned on the ground that on 22.1.2008 the counsel for the petitioner had informed that the writ petition be dismissed, since the connected W.P.No.11654 of 2002 had already been dismissed, as against which Writ Appeal was in process of being filed. However, in the order passed by this Court, the submission of the counsel for the petitioner was erroneously recorded as if he had stated that the writ petition has become infructuous and this Court had accordingly dismissed the writ petition. The submission of the counsel for the petitioner cannot be said to be without merit. As such, W.P.M.P.No.5898 of 2008 is ordered. Accordingly, the order passed by this Court on 22.01.2008 in W.P.No.36886 of 1998 is set aside and instead the following order is passed: “Sri T.S.Venkata Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioner states that a connected W.P.No.11654 of 2002 was dismissed, as against which the Writ Appeal was in process of being filed. Since the connected Writ petition is already dismissed, this writ petition is also liable to be dismissed and is, accordingly, dismissed. However, in the circumstances, without costs.” ______________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J 4th April, 2008 v v