IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 3321 of 1994 Date of Decision: July 14, 2011 Parkash Kaur ….Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: None. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) I have gone through the record. Petitioner filed the present petition for directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Social Studies Mistress against the reserved vacancy to Blind Candidates in Education Department. Post for teacher was advertised on 19.08.1992 and interview of the petitioner was held on 22.12.1992, but she was not selected. In preliminary objection in the reply, respondents specifically averred that petitioner was not fit for the post of CWP No.3321 of 1994 Mistress because she would not see the blackboard, Class or students. Admittedly the post was advertised in the year 1992. It is also admitted case of both the parties that the petitioner is blind and the post advertised for the post of Social Studies Mistress was not reserved for blind candidate. If it is so, the petitioner cannot claim right to the said post. Even otherwise, 19 years have already been elapsed from the date of publication of the said post and the said post has already been filled up. Moreover, it is not the case of the petitioner that an ineligible person has been appointed on the said post. In view of this, I am not inclined to invoke the jurisdiction under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India. Present petition is dismissed. July 14, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2