CWP No.5491 of 2010.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.5491 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.12.2010 **** Pooja Vij . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: None for the petitioner Mr. HS Brar, Addl. AG Punjab Mr. HS Giani, Advocate for respondents No.2,5&7 Mr. Davinder, Advocate for respondent No.9 ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). Mr. HS Brar, learned Addl. AG Punjab has filed affidavit of Paramjit Singh Pannu, Assistant Commissioner of Police (North), Ludhiana, inter alia, to the effect that the petitioner and respondent No.5 (wife and husband, respectively) have compromised their unfortunate matrimonial dispute and a compromise deed dated 01.11.2010 has been duly executed in terms whereof they have decided to obtain divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act and have further decided to CWP No.5491 of 2010.doc - 2 – withdraw civil and criminal cases pending against each other. (2). This Court also persuaded the parties to settle their dispute(s) on the previous date. (3). No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. May be for the reason that a settlement has already been arrived at between the parties, that the petitioner is no longer interested to pursue this writ petition. (4). The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as having become infructuous, however, with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival of the writ petition, if so required. (5). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 21.12.2010 vishal shonkar (SURYA KANT) JUDGE