IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.32854-M of 2010 Date of Decision:30.11.2010 Umesh Bansal .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. J.S. Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) It is stated that the only allegation against the petitioner is that the revolver used by Sanjeev @ Channu, who is his son, was in his name. It is further stated that the matter has been compromised and the quashing petition on the basis of compromise is also pending. Accordingly, petitioner if arrested, shall be released on anticipatory bail to the satisfaction of arresting officer, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when required by the police and shall also comply with conditions specified in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Disposed of. 30.11.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE