IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5353 of 2009 Between: M/s. Aditya Minerals (P) Limited Adilabad. ..... Petitioner AND The Govt., of A.P, rep., by its Secretary, Ministry of Mines, New Delhi & others. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Smt. N. Shoba The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5353 of 2009 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an order or writ one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in Memo No.10133/M.III(2)/2006-2, dated 25.02.2008 rejecting the application of the petitioner dated 07.07.2005 for grant of Mining Lease in Sy.No.50 & 51/Petitioner of Gunjala Village, Thamsi Mandal, Adilabad District and consequential order of the Government in G.O.Ms.No.171, Industries & Commerce (M.III) Department, dated 14.07.2008 granting prospecting licence to the respondent No.4 including the extent of 72.34 Hects., in Sy.No.50 & 51/Petitioner of Gunjala Village, Thamsi Mandal, Adilabad District and the action of the respondent in not disposing of the revision and not passing orders staying the mining operations by the respondent No.4 as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, unconstitutional, violative of Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and Mineral Concession Rules, 1960.” At the hearing, Smt. N. Shoba, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition as infructuous, WPMP No.6982 of 2009 and WVMP.Nos.1174 and 1242 of 2009 are also dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 19 .04.2011 ES