IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20598 of 2009 TUNA PANDEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 07.08.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking bail in a case instituted under section 302/34 and 120B PC. The FIR is against unknown. As per the allegation, it is alleged that co-accused Amresh Rai took the victim on some pretext. Subsequently, the informant learnt that he has been stabbed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in course of investigation, it has come that the parties quarreled on account of payment of certain dues owed by the deceased. It appears from the impugned order that learned Sessions Judge referred several paragraphs of the case diary in which the petitioner has been termed as the main assailant. It is contended that at best what can be derived therefrom is that the petitioner along with others had quarreled with the deceased, whereafter one of the co-accuseds Guddu Singh assaulted him with knife. Learned counsel submits that co-accused Guddu Singh @ Rajiv Ranjan Singh has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court under order dated 01.05.2009, passed in Cr.Misc. No. 49526 of 2008, copy whereof has been produced which is placed on record and marked as ‘Y’. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the - 2 - petitioner abovenamed be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Sonepur, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Rail P.S.Case No. 47 of 2008. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )