'^.,/ [^SL .wll^ ,:it?r c'! IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0._____/2002 PETITIONER ,.-^.L^3^\'A ^s^^ .•-'••^.•^^ •••-.. r ,,..s;%.s--c Rajeev Gupta s/o Shri Jai Kumar Gupta^ aged 28 years» occupation- cultivation^ presently Vice President^ Nagar Panchayat^ Dhamdha, r/o Guptapara^ Dhamdha^ tehsil-Dhamdha, district-Durg(CG)<, r^^- ^ RESPONDENTS ^ ^ ^^;1 '€^ ^' vs» ^ 1» State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Urban Administra- tion and Developnent Department^ D.K.S. Building<» Rajpur (CeG»)^ 2. Director» Urban Administration and Development Department^ Raipur^ 3, Deputy Director^ Vrban Adminis- tration and Developnent Department and Bastar Divisioii, Raipuar. ^ ^ 4^ The Collector^ Durg (C»G»)^ 5» Smte Chameli Tamrakar^ Presidenta Nagar Panchayat^ Dhamdha^ district Durg (C^G^). ^ 6» Chief Municipal Officer^ Nagar Panchayat» Dhamdha, district-Durg^ (^' WRIT PETITIQN UNDERARTICLE 226^227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA XI-HG--78 MWrfT^^R^ ^^-qi^!<nq, ^ei^FS^', 'N^TRTy t^£J.Q3l^X... •^20.0 CT^I'^T'^N' ^®T[^T^T^^W ^oc^ -w^TT 'q^r (^3^^) ^T^R ^fi^ 3^T 02.02.2005 Shri. Rajeev Shrivastaj^a, Smt, Fouzia Mirza, P^iiel Shri R, M. Solapiirkai|, Shri Saiijay K Agan^^, This petitiou pertaia^ of Nagar Palilca, Dhainda. As tiie term for whicjli expu'ed, tlierefore, this Accorduigly, it is dismisse.dj Consequently, M.W, Ij3 also staiid disposed of. ^T^m^N WT^Jf ^ fe^ Tf^?K ^•^waTi^r L, counsel for tlie petitioner. Lawyer for respondent No. 1 to 4. I, counsel for respondent No.5. L coiuisel for respondent No.6. to eonstitutioii of PresMent in Council tiiis dispute relates has already been petrtiou has becoiae infructuous. as haviag becosB.e Hifructiiou.s, ^.No,703/2002; mid I.A. No.5148/2004 Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge y. ,'^ (»