1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.245 OF 2010 Dr.Paresh M. Desai ..Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & ..Respondents ors Petitioner-in-person present None for the Respondents CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 25TH JUNE, 2010 P.C. . Petitioner-in-person states that by Order dated 27th April, 2009 this Court directed that election of the society should be held under the supervision of Officer named by the Registrar. The Court also expressed the hope that the election will obviously be held in accordance with law. Elections have accordingly held but according to the Petitioner not in accordance with law. This is not a question which can be adjudicated in 2 exercise of contempt jurisdiction. Contempt Petition is misconceived and therefore, disposed of. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)