IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 2ND SEPTEMBER 2011 / 11TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 26374 of 2010(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ANDREW PAUL M.G.,SEPOY, O/O.THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS, ERNAKULAM I DIVISION, KOCHI-17 BY ADV. SMT.V.J.RUBY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE MANAGER, K.S.F.E.,ERNAKULAM 2. SPECIAL DY TAHASILDAR (RR) THE K.S.F.E.LTD,I.S.PRESS BUILDING, BANERJI ROAD, COCHIN-18 SRI.M.L.SAJEEVAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 26374 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 2nd day of September, 2011. J U D G M E N T This writ petition comes up in the defect list today. The defect is that after this Court admitted the writ petition and ordered notice on 19.8.2010, the petitioner did not take steps to pay process to issue notice. Therefore, the matter was posted before the Registrar (Judicial) on 29.8.2011 for defects, on which date there was no representation before the Registrar (Judicial). That is why the matter is posted before the Court. When the matter was taken up today, none appears for the petitioner. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S to Judge.