1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3624 OF 2008 Kirit M.Shrimankar .. Applicant. Vs. Union of India .. Respondent. Mr.E.B.Dixit for the applicant. Mrs.A.T.Javeri A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2008. DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2008. DATED : 18TH NOVEMBER, 2008. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant will be satisfied if he is allowed to furnish two solvent sureties. The applicant has been released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.5,00,000/- with a solvent surety in the like amount by an order dated 6.9.2008. The applicant was allowed to deposit cash bail for a period of four weeks to furnish solvent surety. I have perused the order dated 6.9.2008 and having regard thereto and considering overall facts and circumstances of the case I am inclined to modify the said order, so far as the applicant is concerned, and allow the applicant to 2 2 2 furnish P.R. Bond of Rs.5,00,000/- with two solvent sureties in the like amount. Order accordingly. Rest of the order dated 6.9.2008 disposing of the two bail application bearing Nos.1837 of 2008 and 1838 of 2008 remains unaltered. The application is disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)