1 Appln 3855-10 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3855 OF 2010 Tushar Pralhad Thakar ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.A.P.Mundargi, Senior Counsel i/b. Mr.K.S.Patil, for the Applicant Mrs.Geeta Mulekar, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 5TH OCTOBER, 2010 P.C. . The applicant, who has been charge sheeted for his alleged involvement in offence of murder of Pandharinath and Chandrakant Parkhi in connection with C.R.No.132 of 2009 for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 364, 120(b), 341, 143, 146, 147, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Chakan Police Station, District Pune seeks enlargement on bail. FIR mentioned suspicion in respect of involvement of Ankush Parkhi, Nivrutti Parkhi and ten others due to some dispute between family. Investigation 2 Appln 3855-10 proceeded on that line till on 4th October, 2009 i.e. almost three months after the incident. P.I. B.R.Andhalkar found that of local Crime branch found that not those Parkhis but the present applicant and others were involved in the two murders. The investigation then took another turn. The applicant and others were arrested and after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed. There were two witnesses, who had seen the incident. Minesh Deshmukh and his sisters-in-law had seen the incident. Till the charge sheet was filed, Test Identification Parade was not held. After this application was filed in this Court, a question was asked to the learned APP as to whether Test Identification Parade was held. She states that it was arranged and held on 14th September, 2010 at which said Minesh Deshmukh was said to have identified the present applicant. There is no recovery from the applicant. The learned APP submits that 3 Appln 3855-10 there is some mobile call data but is not able to clarify as to whether any mobile phone which could be said to have owned by the applicant was found to have been used in the vicinity where the incident took place. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that before the Test Identification Parade was held, the applicants were being regularly produced in the Court every month. 2. Considering nature of evidence collected, applicant's being at large is unlikely to prejudice a fair trial. The applicant be released on bail on his furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.50,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the like amount of Rs.50,000/- on the condition that he shall attend Chakan Police Station, District Pune on the 1st Sunday of every month between 10.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. Till the trial is over. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.) 4 Appln 3855-10