CP.418-99 - 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION No. 418 OF 1999 Mr. Hindurao Anna @ Balu Godase & Anr. ...Petitioners Vs. Mr. Vithal Nivrutti Godase & Ors. ...Respondents *** Mr. L. S. Gaikwad, for the Petitioners. Mr. V. S. Mhaispurkar i/b D. S. Mhaispurkar, for Respondent Nos. 1, 2A & 3. *** CORAM: V. M. KANADE J. DATE : JANUARY 21, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and respondent Nos. 1, 2A & 3. It is case of the petitioners that respondents have committed breach of the order dated 14-10-1994 passed by this Court, directing the respondents to pay maintenance of Rs.1,000/- per month to the petitioners from the said date onwards. It is submitted that respondents have not paid maintenance, as directed by this Court. CP.418-99 - 2 - 2. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1, 2A & 3 submits that the consent terms were filed in the execution proceedings and in view of the said consent terms, the darkhast proceedings were disposed of. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that signature of the petitioner on the said darkhast is forged. It is not possible for this Court to decide this issue. The fact remains that decree has been discharged pursuant to the consent terms filed therein. Therefore, it cannot be said that respondents have committed contempt of this Court. Hence, the contempt petition is dismissed. [ V. M. KANADE J.]