'x c... HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition Ss) No. 2619 of 2007 Petitioners 1) Sundar Lal Jain, aged about 42 ysars, S/o. Shri Krishna Ram Jain, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Rodde. 2) Mohan Lal Jain, aged about 42 years, S/o. Shri Diiip Kumar Jain, Mandavi Assistant Teacher.Middie School Nathima Navaaaon. 3) Sagua Ram Darro, Aged about 37 years, S/o. Baldu Ram Darro, Assistant Teacher, Primary Schooi Allbeda. 4) Chetan Singh Darro, aged about 40 years, S/o. Late M.S. Darro, Assistant Teacher, Primary Schooi Pidhapal, AII are at Block Kanker, Dist. Kanker, CG. Respondents ;'\ •<,.... Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, CG. 2) The Director, Public Instruction Department, Raipur, CG 3) District Education Officer, Kanker District Kanker, CG. 4) Biock Education Officer, Kanker, CG. 5) Treasury & Funds Department, Kanker, CG (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India). (SB: Hon'bieShri Justice Satish K. Agnihotri) PRESENTF Shri D.K. Prajapati, counsei for the petitioners. Ku. SunitaJain, PanelLawyerfortheState. ?& .;-'A-./:'.:." w 3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 1st May 2007) The auestion of law ihvoived herein as to whether the petitioners are entitled tb regular pay scaie with effect from the date of initia! appointment or from the date of compietion of probation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of iaw involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Writ Petition (S) No. 5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 7-11 -2006. In view of the above statedsubmission made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is ailowed in the same terms. Noorderastocosts. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge •«•;;