//? •:^^^^Sisk,. ?"?^..- '":i"E"e S^Ch IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M. C. C. No.5^ OF 2011 IN Cjvil Revision N0. 116/2005. APPLICANT Smt. Phoolwati, W/o. late Prabhu Das Vaishnav, /^^y y aged about 45 years, R/o. Block ./, ^y/^ .r?" / ^ 7^ / £r -P / €/^/ <f'^ /-ov) Colony, Dantewada, Tahsil and District Dantewad (C.G.) VERSUS NON-APPLICANT Smt. Suniti Vaishnav, W/o. late Govind Das Vaishnav, R/o. Village Jhediabadam, P. O. Karli, Tahsil and District Daiitewada (C.G.) APPLICATIQN FOR RESTORATION OF CFVIL REVISION N0. 116/2005 -78 311^1 ^I !<;-) WII 3D^T *><!+ Sahu ~3~^ '<ii'i<i^<-i, yflly'Ko, [s|<vijyy,< 'Wvff ftiHlcb ••••—-•••-•••——j--"-^ 200 sn^i'^w; ('iili'i'^) TOnwBf?? OT^I S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.M 16.08.2011 Shri Shrawan Agrawal, Shri Keshav Dewangan, ^jdvocate for the applicant. |Advocate for respondent. Heard on application for Learned counsel appear} counsel for the applicant coul<p mistake, therefore, C.R. No.| 15.07.2011, may be restored t<^ On due consideration, applicant has suceeeded in therefore, the application is a!l to its original file. A copy of this order be p| the same be listed for hearing ^ tbl^^'^'l W^ ^ F^^l •(f^l^K ^aiRiiTsn^i -estoration ofC.R. No. 116/05. ng for the applicant submits that the not appear on account of bonafide 116/05, which was dismissed on its origina! file. am satisfi.ed that the counsel for ^xplaining the cause of his absence, l^wed and C.R. No. 116/05 is resfored aced on record of the original flte and ifter two weeks. _^— Sd/'- N.K.Agarawal Judge