1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3620 OF 2010 (The State of Maharashtra & Ors. vs. Nashir Kha Sher Kha) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. AUGUST 05, 2010. Shri Kakade, learned AGP for the petitioners states that the respondent joined in 1981 as Oilman and in 1986 he was brought on C.R.T.E. in that capacity. His contention that he worked as Driver from 1990 thereafter is, therefore, totally irrelevant as C.R.T.E. could not have been applied to him thereafter. The direction to confer C.R.T.E. status upon him by Industrial Court with effect from 01.01.1995 as Driver is, therefore, assailed as without jurisdiction. He has also invited attention to explanation given in para 2.4 of writ petition to explain delay and laches. The facts on record show that impugned judgment is dated 10.11.2005 and present petition has been filed on 04.05.2010. The learned Member of Industrial Court has found that since 1990 the respondent was working as Driver and therefore after completing five years, as directed, he should be brought on C.R.T.E. in that capacity. The contention of the petitioner that he was not working as a Driver or a 2 Oilman is found to be not substantiated. This finding is based on fact. The explanation for laches and delay is also not convincing. It appears that file did not move for over three years between 25.08.2006 to 03.10.2009. In this situation, I am not inclined to interfere in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. No orders as to costs. JUDGE *GS.