IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH MARCH 2011 / 18TH PHALGUNA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 1635 of 2011() ---------------------------------- (CRIME NO.2505/2010 OF ALUVA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT) .... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 3 AND 4 --------------------------------------- 1. RAMLATH ISMAIL, WIFE OF MOHAMMED ISMAIL, 3D, MARINE PLAZA, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM. 2. MOHAMMED ISMAIL, SON OF P.K.MOHAMMED, 3D, MARINE PLAZA, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM. BY SRI.M.K.DAMODARAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE ADVS. SRI.ALAN PAPALI SRI.SOJAN MICHEAL SRI.GILBERT GEORGE CORREYA RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, (CRIME NO.2505/2010 OF ALUVA POLICE STATION), REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBIANCODE PROSECUTOR SRI.V.MANU THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs V. RAMKUMAR, J. ................................... B.A. No. 1635 of 2011 .................................. Dated: 9th March, 2011 O R D E R In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioners who are the accused in Crime No. 2505 of 2010 of Aluva Police Station for an offence punishable under Sec. 498 A I.P.C. seeks anticipatory bail. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. 3. After evaluating the factors and parameters which are to be taken into consideration in the light of paragraph 122 of the verdict dated 2-12-2010 of the Apex Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and Others (2010 (4) KLT 930) ,, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with the above case on each of the petitioners executing a bond for ` 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to the following conditions: - 1. Petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Bail A.No. -:2:- Wednesdays. 2. Petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation including custodial interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer. 3. Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution. 4. Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail. 5. The bail granted pursuant to this order shall be in force till the end of the trial of the case unless and until it is cancelled by this Court in accordance with paragraph 103 of the verdict in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre's case (supra). If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above. Dated this the 9th day of March, 2011. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. ani/