IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD1CATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. _f_2-/6^_/2002 ^ ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226,227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA :y- PETITIONER RESPONDENTS C.M.SHARAF AGED 49 YEARS S/0 LATE SHR! BRIJLM SHARAF RESIDENT OF GEETANJALI APARTMENT, KASTURBA NAGAR SINDHI COLONY BILASPUR TAHSIL AND DISTRICT BILASPUR (CHHATTIGARH) VERSUS •S^y CHHATTISGARH ELECTRICITl' BOARD •>'**MS'? THROUGH SECRETARY CHHATTISQARH ^^:'?'",'^^'''^ ELECTRICITY BOARD, DAGNIYA 'yn^"^^ RAIPUR. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (CITf DIVISION) CHHArnSGARHELECTRlCITIY BOARD..BILASPUR. M/S. GEETANJALI CONSTRUCTION THROUGH PARTNER SHRt S.R. SAHU NEHRU NAGAR, AMERI ROAD, BILASPUR WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IN.DA FOR tSSUANGE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS, CERTiOR/^PROHIBlTION AND OR ANY OTHER WRIT/ ORDER DIRECTION. !N THE SAME NATURE IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. 'WgS^si^ , t y.;1(-.^>i*1 ^^&- l^ r7^ PETITIONER HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.62 OF 2003 C.M. Sharaf Versus RESPONDENTS Chhattisgarh Electricify Board & Othere (Writ Petition under Article 226& 227 <rfthe Constitution of India) SingteBench : Hon'bteShri SatishK. ^nihotri, J, Present:- None for the petittoner. Nonefor the respondents. ORDER (Passed on ttiis 25UI day of htovember,2011) 1. The matter is called tor hearing twice. None appears nor is any representation made on behaff of the petiUoner. The peUtioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. Inviewoftheabove.thematlerisdismissedfervwitofprosecutiOR. SdA SatishK.^gntfa,^ astok •r--s