IN TEE HI GH COURT OF CHHAT’I‘ISG ARE AT BILA$E9UR WRIT ETxT‘ION‘ N‘o. 4%}? OF 2064 u-u-m-unu-unu-uu 3 Smt; Rajmaniya’,’ Wife of Sukhra Ra m Ca ste :‘ Cherwa,’ aged about 4'7 years, resident cf Namna Kala, Ambikapur, District z Surguja ( CG ) OF INDIA..am-uu.‘-.w—mnueu.nem u uu‘mu...mm“ y ~ Q§Q£§V VERSUS ‘s‘ Q‘% 5 é“ wasmmm : 1. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ambikapur. f Distt z Surg'uja ( CG ). 2. Collector; Ambikapur, Bisttt 3 Smrguja ( CG ) . 3. Headmaster; Govt; Primary Scl'nol, ( Gaddi School ), Q Brahma Para, Ambikapur; Distt : $urguja ( CG ) 1mm PErggigm UND Eawgmxc§§wggq227 ggng‘ra‘a comsg‘xwmom ‘1 ’ IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : B!LASPU H R WRET PETITION N0. 4238 OF 2004 , 3) Corporation! Ambikapur &"’0thers ‘ (Wnt Petltlon under Artlcie 226 of the Constitution of india) Smgle Bench Hon ble Shn Satnsh K Aamhotrl J - Present :4 Shn T R Chandrakar Advocake forthe petitioner i - Shn B D Guru Advocate for the respondent No 1 r Shn N N Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State n”..- ORDER ORAL) . o (Passed onthis2 day of March,2010) r ’ Learned counsel appearing for the pewoner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner seekspermission of this Court to withdraw this - 4 petition with liberty to pursue the representation already pending before the authorities. 2) it is ordered, as prayed for. 3) Accordingly, the -writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the ' aforesaid liberty. \ Sd/- Saush K Agnmom Judge » Gowri : PETlTiONER r Smt. Rajmaniya Versus RESPONDENTS Commissioner, ‘ Municipai