KK C^ 9^, IN THE HOK'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISHGARH ATBILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. (S)No. \ 2.3,6 2010 Petitioners - /' /y ^^s^ ^/^y <}i^f^/ '.••'''i?*>/\'£?'' ^w -?-'A.Y ^K .c^<y fl-' .f .•'' c " y -<!?' ^- 1. Dashrath Ram Sahu aged 46 years Son of late Shri Nohar Singh Sahu, Upper Division Teacher Govt. Higher Secondary School, Gurur Block Tahsil Gurur Distt. Durg C.G. 2. Satya Prakash Panchangam aged 43 years Son of late Shri Sanak Ram Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary SchoQl, Kochera Block Gurur District Durg C.G. y 3. Bhagwat Ram Thakur aged 47 years' Son of late Shri Kusha Ram Thakur Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kaneri, Block Gurur District, Durg (C.G.) ^4. Smt. Manki Thakur aged 39 years Wife of Shri Bhagwat Ram Thakur Upper Division Teacher, Government Middle School, Narbada, Block Gurur District Durg (C.G.) ^5. Bhishan Lal Mahamalla aged 43 years Son of late Shri Purushottam lal Mahamalla Head Master, Govt. Primary School, Diyabati, Block Gurur District Durg. ^6. Ramcharan Thakur aged 46 years Son of lateShri Ankaluram Thakur Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Tarri, Block Gurur District Durg C.G. . 7. Brijlal Yadav aged 49 years son of late Shri Jhadu Ram Yadav, Upper Division Teacher, Government Middle School, Narbada, . Block Gurur District Durg C.G. -8. Smt. Seema Sahu aged 41 years Widow of Shri Khemanlal Sahu Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Girl's Middle School, Gurur Block Gurur District Durg C.G. ^- 9. Smt, Radha Sahu aged 43 years Wife of Shri Sampat Ram Sahu, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Kanharpuri,BlockGurur District Durg C.G. Respondents ... ... /1. Versus State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) District Education Officer, Durg. , Block Edycation Officer, Gurur Tahsil Gurur District Durg (C.G.) Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ or IVIandamus/Direction or other aoproDriate writ y y PETIT! HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASBUf WRIT PETSTiON (S) N0.1236 OF 2010 Dashrath Rann Sahu & Others Versus State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & Others ier Article 226 ofthe Constitution of Indiai 'nch : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri, J. RESPONDENTS uA/nt Pstltlor Sinale B< Present:- Shri Somkant Verma; Ad'.ocate for th.e petitioners. Shri N.N. Rov, Panel Lawverforthe State. i'ORAU (Passed on thls 25th day of March, 2010) 1) Wlth the consent of tearned counsei appearing for the parties; the petition is heard finally. • • 2) By this petition, the petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to pay two advance incremeirts from the date of passing of D.Ed. exarnination, on their own expenses, after enterlna into service. Learned counsei apDearina for the petitioners submits that the Ji issue invoived in the present case is no longer res integra as the same has been considered and decided by the Supreme Court in Asha Ssxsna v. Stats ofM.P. S. Of5.' as "rei! as by this Court in 'Ysshwant Kumar Bhsradwaj v. Municiftai Corporation, Durg and anothef and Gopesh Kumar Vsrma v. T.he Stats Govt. ofChhaWsgarh andanother. ^f^nn ,';;'il s.fr^ 'rs ./c?-J">\ cn zuuy (;iij iVii-\i^ ^</) °y 2 2006(1.) MPJR-CG96 S.WP?S)No.4130of2005 :.w" "-^ ,fY"" @ iagi^ <r.s<<'J '•<S' ^fs' It-.^.J:».<S5-' GO'AT! L iy¥^s&"i rtft" ir'ics la 1 ICU LityUE SiSC! ner si that the instant petition is squareiy covered by the decisions (supra) as aforestated. Thus, the petitioners may be permitted to make representations to declde their Individual cases ir. the liaht of aforestated decisions, subject to yerificatiQn of the facts. Learned cQunsel appearlng for the State submits that in the event, the petitioners make representations, the sa.me wil! be considered and decided, in accordance with taw and in the iight of the declslons of the Supreme Court in Asha Saxena (supra) as wel! as this Court in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj (supra) and Gopesh Kumar 'verma (supra), within a period of slx 'A'eeks from the date of receipt of the representations. m vievv of foregoing, according to the learned cQunsei appearina for the petitloners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordinaiv, the writ peiition is di ftoW s^ Sa^^^e 3udS(