^^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 363 of 2003 Petitioner Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. Raipur Hoinoeopafhic & Bio Cheinic Association, fhrough fhe Presideiit, Ramkund, Raipur, TaiisU aad District Raipur The Uniou of India, fhrough the Secretary, Mio.istry of healUi & Family Welfare, New Delhi 110001 The Central Council of Homoeopathi, Jawaliar Lal Nehni, Bhartiya Chikitsa Avum Homoeopathi Anusaadhaii Bhavau, No. 61- 65, Iiistitational Area, Opp. D-Block, Jaaakpuri, New Delhi 110 058. The State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough the Secretar}7, healfh Departiiient, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) Pt. Ravishaakar Shukla University, through ttie Registrar, Raipur (CG) (Writ Petition imder Article 226 & 227 offlie Constitution oflndia) (SB: Honl3le Shri Satish K. Agniliotri J.) Shii AditySi Khare, Advocate for fhe petitioner, Shri Anirito Das, Paael La\vyer for fhe respondent No. 3/State, Ms Sharmila Smghai, Assistaiit SoUcitor General for tlie respondent no. 1. ..^- 1. O RD E R (orall ( Passed on this 19th day ofAugust, 2009) Heard. Leamed couusel appeariiig for the petitioner, on iastructions, subiuits fhat fhe petitioner seeks peroiissiou of this Court to withdraw tliis petition, as this petition has become mfi^ictuous. Leanied counsel appearing for tiie respondents have no objection. Accordiagly, ttie petition is disniissed as withdrawn, as havnig beconie infructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 2. 3. Thabir