Civil Revision No. 2244 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2244 of 2009 Date of decision:- 03.07.2009. Om Parkash ...Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present:- Mr. P.K. Sachdev, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Khawatra, Sr. DAG Haryana for respondent Nos.1 to 3. A.N.JINDAL J. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 19.2.2009 passed by Additional District Judge, Chandigarh dismissing the application of the petitioner for leading additional evidence. After hearing both the parties at length, it transpires that the learned trial court did not proceed to hear the arguments in the main appeal but has decided the application for leading additional evidence without the arguments being addressed on merits. As regards the earlier application filed by the petitioner, which was allowed, the same cannot be treated as res-judicata as the said principle does not apply to the orders passed on the intermediate applications. Consequently, this revision petition is allowed and the Appellate Court is directed to hear the arguments in the main appeal and if Civil Revision No. 2244 of 2009 -2- he considers any document to be taken on record by way of additional evidence in order to enable him to pronounce the judgment or for any other substantial cause then he would consider the application or otherwise refuse the same. While deciding the application the court would not be influenced by the impugned order. The petition is disposed of accordingly. July 3, 2008 (A.N.JINDAL) vj JUDGE