IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.55587 of 2007 AJAY SINGH @ AJAY KUMAR SINGH & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- Cr.Misc. No.3758 of 2008 KEDAR SINGH & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 24.6.2008 As both the anticipatory bail applications arise out of the same P.S.Case, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners in Cr.Misc.No. 55587/2007 are Bhaisur and Gotani and petitioners in Cr.Misc.No. 3758/2008 are father-in-law and mother-in-law. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is nothing specific against these petitioners and they have been falsely roped in. He further contended that the parents-in- law are also quite aged persons against more than 70 years. Learned counsel appearing for the informant and the A.P.P. for the State opposed the submissions. Considering the allegation made in the F.I.R., the petitioners, namely, Ajay Singh @ Ajay Kumar Singh and Kiran Devi, are directed to surrender before the court below within four weeks from today and in the event of their surrender or arrest before police, they shall be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial 2 Surendra/ Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in Shahpur P.S.Case No. 81/2007, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. So far prayer of other two petitioners, namely, Kedar Singh and Urmila Devi, are concerned, considering their role in the family, I do not feel inclined to grant anticipatory bail to them. Their prayer for bail is rejected. However, they may surrender in the lower court and pray for regular bail and in that event their bail would be disposed of on merit without being prejudiced by this order. ( Rekha Kumari,J.)