CWP(T) No. 7995/2008 02.12.2010 Present: Mr. S. R. Sharma, vice Mr. B. N. Misra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. A.G. for the respondents-State Petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- (i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to regularised services of the applicant as Daily-wage nursery watcher from 1995 i.e. on his completion of 10 years as daily wager as per the policy of the State Govt. with all consequential benefits. (ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to pay the enhanced wages to the applicant for the period from 1-1-94 to 31-12-94 @Rs.21.75 per day with interest because the applicant was entitled for the same due to increase of rate of wages by the Govt. from back date. (iii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to compensate the applicant on account of use of his land for raising nursery under the social forestry scheme measuring 1 bigha and 17 biswas for the period from 1986 to 1999 by way of additional wages as per the assurance held out to the applicant at the time of occupation of the land for the said purpose with interest. (iv) That the respondents may be directed to produce record of the case. (v) That the respondents may be saddled with cost of this litigation. 2. During the course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prayed that qua relief (iii) liberty be granted to the petitioner to take recourse to such remedies as are available to him in accordance with law. Liberty granted. 3. Qua relief No. (i), it is apparent from Annexure R-1 that from the year 1992 petitioner worked with the respondents but however it is also evident that he worked for more than 240 days in a calendar year only w.e.f. 1996. 4. Reply was filed in the year 2002. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has no instructions as to whether petitioner’s services stand regularized after completion of period of 10 years counting from the year 1996 onwards. 5. There is no dispute that State of Himachal Pradesh has framed certain policies of giving benefits and according work charged status/regularizing those employees who complete more than 10 years of service. 6. Under the circumstances, direction is issued to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization, if already not done. Needful be positively done within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. 7. With respect to relief No.(ii), it stands clarified by the respondents that all enhanced wages have been uniformly paid to all employees of the State. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed with respect to this relief. With the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed off. December 02, 2010 ( Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.