HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.5657 of 2009 PETiTIONERS: RESPONDEN_TS: ^fk 1. 2. 3. -Versus- 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Sukhdev Singh Sando, S/o late Kripal Singh Sando, Aged 66 years Mohinder Singh Sando, S/o Late Kripal Singh Sando, aged 78 years Smt. Kutdeep Kaur Sando, Wd/o late Gurusharan Singh Sando, aged 62 years, Seerath Singh Sando, S/o late Hardeep Singh Sando, aged 44 years Baljeet Singh Sando, S/o late Hardeep Singh Sando; aged 42 years, Petitioners No.1 to 5 all are Residents of Ch/il Lines G.E. Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Urt?an Administration & Devetopment, Mantralaya, <Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ' Coliector, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Munfcipal Corporation, Raipur through its Commissioner, Municipaf Corporation, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, . Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Jbint Director, Town & Courrtry Planning, Directorate of Town & Country Planning, Raipur (Chhatti'sgarh) Present Shri Ashish Shrivastava, counset forthe petitioners. Shri Alok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate forthe State/respondents N.o.1, 2 & 5. Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, Adwcate for respondents No.3 and 4. . -< V :af iarve Mw Sinale Bench: Hon'bleShri Dhirendra Mishra, J. ORALORDER (8-12-2009) 1. Thepetitioners have flted this petition and prayed for a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners and execute the lease deed in respect of the plots allottedto the petitioners as described in the petition. 2. Shri Alok Bakshi, leamedGovt. Advocate appearing for the State submitted that the Municipal Corporation has already submitted its proposal for according approvai for execution of lease deed and the State has constituted a Committee consisting 6f 5 members to examine the matter and has directed to submit its report. 3. Shri Shrivastava, iearned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the land in question has been allotted by the State Government on 27-7-2007 and the Munteipal Corporation hassubmitted its proposal on 24-12-2008, however, even after the lapse of almost one year, lease deed has not been executed. in these cireumstances, the State be directed to decide the matter as perthe recommendations ofthe Municipa! Corporation within the specified period. r 4. After hearing ieamed counsel for the parties, it is directed thatthe State shall take a decision on recommendationsof the Municipal Corporation in the matters of exeeution of lease deed of the petitioners expeditiously latest by 8th Januarv. 2010. 5. With the aforesaid direction, the petition is disposed of. However, the petltioners are at liberty to approach-this Court again if cause of action stitl survives. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge f-/ >1!IP'Bi^'IS^-a^B-'--4;^Sst;s®'^^^^^^ggj^^^BaslffldN5^BiS^^^