IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.53017 of 2008 VIVEKANAND MISTRY @ SARDAR @ VIVEKA MISTRY @ SARDAR MISTRY, son of Sri Madan Mistri, resident of village Budhanichak, P.S. Barh, Patna district Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 02.02.2009 Heard. The petitioner was granted bail by an order passed by a bench of this court under certain conditions imposed upon him, as may appear from that order passed in Cr. Misc. No. 13729 of 1993. The hearing of the case was concluded as regards recording of the evidence and noticing arguments of the parties and it was fixed for judgment on 20.2.2001 but since thereafter the petitioner could not be available to the trial court resulting in the case reverting back to appearance of the accused persons and the petitioner was brought before the court only after being arrested and produced before the court below on 2.8.2008. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner who was requesting the court to fix a time frame for delivering the judgment which was only to be done as the case had been heard in full. I do not see any reason for fixing any time frame inasmuch as the court could, in case of the evidence being completed in Sessions Trial No. 992A of 1994, only hear the argument of both the sides and re-post the case for delivering judgment. The court trusts that it could be done in a very short time. Petition is dismissed. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)