1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 246/2006 (Akhil Kumar Manakchand Daftari & anr. Vs. The Collector, Wardha & 2 ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. N.R. Saboo, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Khubalkar, A.G.P. for R- 1 and 2. Mr. M.M. Agnihotri, Adv. for R- 3. CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : MARCH 11, 2008. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the present writ petition and prays that a direction be given to the Sub Divisional Officer, the respondent no.1, to decide the representation made by the petitioners, at the earliest. The counsel for the respondent no.3 states that the representation of the petitioners is misconceived and they cannot call in question the sanction granted to the layout of the respondent 2 no.3 long time ago. Be that as it may. We dispose of the petition with direction to the respondent no.1 to decide the above referred representation, if not decided earlier, on its own merit according to law and procedure applicable in this regard, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners as well as the respondent no.3, at the earliest. JUDGE JUDGE RMP