IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.18834 of 2010 1. BIMAL SINGH son of Satya Narain Singh & 2. Sumit Kumar Singh @ Sonu Singh son of Bimal Singh Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 13.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 448, 324, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner was refused bail earlier by order dated 7.1.2010 stating therein that it was being rejected for the present. Considering that the petitioners are in custody since 2.9.2009 and the trial is going on tardily, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-cum- Fast Track Court No. II, Madhubani, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 141 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (v) that the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)