1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8566 OF 2009 Sau. Sharda w/o Sanjay Patil ... PETITIONER VERSUS Lacchamareddy s/o Irrareddy Bhuttan Hippargekar and others ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri A.J. Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner - absent Shri Milind Patil, Advocate for respondent No.1. ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 6th October, 2010 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the respondent. After arguing for a substantial time, Mr. Patil, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 in Writ Petition informed, the very application in which intervention was sought by the present petitioner itself is being withdrawn by the respondent. Mr. Deshpande, learned counsel for the petitioner accepts this position, desires disposal of Writ. In the light of the fact situation, Writ Petition is disposed of without making observations on the merits of the order under challenge. No costs. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/wp8566.09