IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1663 of 2010 Date of Decision: March 11, 2010 Rama and others …Petitioners Versus Sawinder Kaur and others. …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present: Mr. Premjit Kalia, Advocate, for the petitioners. S.D. Anand, J. The plea raised by the petitioners, for leave of the Court to amend the pleadings, did not find favour with the learned Trial Court which observed that the petitioners herein were thereby inclined “to set up an entirely new case in which the entire matter will be required to be opened up, proved and rebutted by the parties.” The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, has not been able to even aver that there is any factual inaccuracy in the impugned order. He is also not in a position to urge that the allowance of the amendment plea would not amount to reopening of the case, particularly when the rights and liabilities inter-se of the parties have fructified C.R. No. 1663 of 2010 with the disposal of the controversy by the learned Rent Controller. The petition is ordered to be dismissed in limine. March 11, 2010 (S.D. Anand) vkd Judge 2