"ss'm P BEN^H Vv/^^^''^[!-:' eri' f'[001 IN THE HIGH COURT OP JUDICATURE CHHATFISGARH ATBILASPUR m£JKL_/ 2006 Petitioner ^- ^j\ ^Shri S.C.Deshlahare S/o Sftri D,R, Desfalahare, Aged Ahout 47 years, R/o Sakhrod, Tslisil - Guaderdehi, Dist: Durg-(C.G.) ^J<y^-- ..••"\ V;?'" ..^^" igc^fY [.•••" ^yyv <6°>'"A...•••'"' <^"" , RftsBQttdeiits Versus :1. State &f Chhattts^t-h Through - The gecretary, Department ofForest, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur-(C.G.) / 2. ChiefConsenrafor ofPore&t, Jail Soad, Kaipur, Dist: Raipur-fC.G.) .3. Divlsional Forest Officer Udanti Forest Raage (Van Mandal}, G^ariyaband, Oist: Raipur - (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 2^6/227 OP THE CONSTITUTEON OF INDIA / 7^ •<II<IIM<<, aiflw'is, Ri<ni'H'i< rt-^..^.f^°:JJ/?/A£. W^vt{ sbl41* ••••••"•••••••<••••• ^r 200 ^J^-7 3<i^i'i yaqi ('i^3al^8T) sii^n'^'R-fi* (m3TT?7TstiH Roshan/- &> <° WlITWB^iTSn^T ^bv 7.7.2006 Heard Shri Anand Kumar Tiwt ShriSalish Gupta, Dy.Govt. By the present petition th^ propriety and correctness of the or): No.1 whereby the pelitioner, who is] Udanti Forest Range, Gariyaband^, Madna, Forest Range Marwahi, Di) petitioner is 1hal he has been Iran^i confrary fo the policy dafed 26.9 regarding transfer. Learned counse! for fhe petifij petitioner may be allowed to make a| raising a!l his grievance and in turn representation, to which fearned Having heard iearned couns^l facts and cireumstances of fhe case,| representation to respondent No.1| respondent No.1 to decide the repr^ month from the date of rece'pi of if points raised by the petitioner in acc(( With the direction aforesaid, ll|i Consequently, M.(W.)P. No. coujisel °bi<<fti4)-i ii*icil'fftei<S'<Ri^i< ^iSrfWTSn^T ari, Adv. for the petitioner. '. for the respondents on advance copy. pelitioner has questioned ihe iegality, ter dated 1.7.2006 passed by respondent working as Foresl Range Officer, Mainpur, Districi Raipur, has been Iransferred to atrict Biiaspur. The main grievanoe of the ferred within a period of 1 year 9 momhs issued by fhe State Goyernment iners submits that in the circumstances the detaiied representation to respondent No.1 respondent No.1 be directed to decide the for the State has no objection. 'l for (he parties and having regard to the the petitioner is allowed to make a detailed wifhin 10 days from today and in turn, 'sentation of petitioner within another one he representation after considering aii the rdance with law. le peiition stands disposed of. 540/2006 also stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Jiidge •:y '-'-.? •fr"'