«?' ^ .'iK', IN;THElHGH^QtJR3^E2jlJDIG^3t[RE^.BIlMSPUR^HHA^ MISELLANEOBSAPPEAL N0. - JSiiigl® 6f2006 (MEMORAtn3UMOFAroEALUNDERSECTIGW173QETHE^MOTORVEHICtESACT,1988) APPELLANT NQW^JPPLICANT RESPONDENTS CLAIMANTS -^^ ^^ <?< NONAPPLICANTS NON-CLAIMANTS ^Qolc&and^^iya.'S/aKu-atmial/iSe^^ aged afeout;6Q^;yeare, R/o -^.lawafiariNagar, Near Sitaram ^Mandir, Rarpur,; Di.stnEf ^|-s Raipur:(C.G.y:5;'':'': ; ..:,::_;',1; :'1;': ! -:; VERSUS' ^T. Maniram S/o Sonqdtiar, aged ab^ years,caste-Kalari ' ; : 2. ^-- Smt. Jayati W/o Maniram,agedabout42 u years. • ' -:'BI '• Both ·R^- Village Kalar Para Ghotpal, Block- Geedaln, Tehsil & Distnct - South Baster Dantewada (C.G.) ^ MahaveerJain,; S/o Nemichand Jainj aged; abouf 34 ye^rs, R/p- Near Da.nfe|sUwairi Pefrol Pump; Maia Ro^, Geedan^ 11'ehsil & District-SeMiBasterDaiitewada^C.Q.) (OwnerofVehicle beai'mgregistration No. MP 25/6771) 2. ^ Chaitan Das Si/6 Baldev Das (Wrongly in r^ection order as Baldy ©as);, R/o- BehindtBe StateBailk, Beside QfGirl:s Hostel, Pathaii^ra Road, Geedam, Tehsil & District-Dante!ivada(G.G.) 3. (DriverofVehiclebearmgregistration No.MP 25/6771) Parasmal Ruggad,; S/o^Late Lunkaram Duggad,aged^lx)H;t52years,R/o-Near StafeBaiiK,Mgin;K.oad,@reedam,Tehsiland District- Daiit^yada (C^j.) (Driver ofVehiGle,beSTmg;registrationNp.;MP23/B1871) ^ ,14 : ^. f' vV ME»I0RANDUMOEAI>I>EAiL®^^SEGTIC^1730E'^ •::^VEHI^LES'AC'T.;:1^88" -:: ': ; - 7\ i «r :! XI-HC-78 •A i;t^^|<<|C^,«»^^'^(qCTI?^^ . M,y|.Vto.^2^^^w *ll*lciil®IIW"••""""""""""""^""""""^1^200 3ll^<IMiiq»(*yf^«l<ri) an^CT^iRii'B (raT3n^CT**ii* Gopa! r ^' g'wiaRtiliasn^il 25<4-2006 liable accident Mr. Shivendu Pandya, learn) Heard on admission. Theappellanthas preferred| 11-2005 (Annexure A/1) passed Claims Tribunal, Dantewada in interim compensation for a sum of claimants,and the appellant and been held jointly and severally lia^ls submite that on the date of vehicle involved in the accident. has not faeen arrayed as a nor|- Tribunal has fastened the liabj appellanf. 1 have heard leamedcouns^l Taking into consideration applieatjon for interim compensatit)n the appellant to raise all his gneva) same may be decided after eviderli dyring trial; Thus, there is no liable to be dismissed and is In the light of above order, grant of stay, stands dismissed. ^d counsel for the appellant. forcte <BI<lIn<Ill 11*fCTT*f fe'^1 '<|ul'(^;l'! ^•aiKltailiCT |thisappeal against the order dated28- ()y learned Additional Motor Accidents Qlaim Case No.76/2005and by which Rs.50,0.00/- has been awarded to the |he owner of the cotliding vehicle have Learned counsel for the appellant t, the appellant had transferred the however, the newowner of the vehicle -applicant and even then the Claims |ity of interim compensation on the 'l forthe appellant. that by the instant order only the has been adjudicated, it is open for ices before the Claims Tnbunal and the ce is aciduced by the respective parties in the instant appeal and the same is accorpingly yismissed. M.(C.)P.No.672/2006, an application for Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra' Judge »*.