IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2698 of 2007 Ramu Rai son of late Matuki Rai, resident of village Lagma (Singhia) P.S. Singhia, District Samastipur. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Dr.N.Shravan Kumar, Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Samastipur. -------------------- 6 14.10.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the State as also a supplementary affidavit on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State submits that the case of the petitioner was considered pursuant to the order of this Court. The petitioner since did not fulfill the necessary requisite qualification, he could not be appointed on the post of Chowkidar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the authority has not passed the correct order, as the department relied of the circular which was issued after filing of the contempt application. Ms. Nivedita Nirvikar submits that in case according to petitioner if the order is not correct he ought to have assailed the same before the appropriate forum and not by way of contempt application. Be that as it may, since the order has been complied with as contained in Annexure- G to the show cause, the contempt application need not proceed further. The same stands disposed of. Prakash (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)