THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3772 of 2005 ORDER: The respondent herein, who is none other than the father of the petitioner, filed O.S.No.270 of 2004 in the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Madhira, Khammam District for the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of the suit schedule property, namely, a house bearing No.1-78, admeasuring 355.5 square yards. He has also filed I.A.No.275 of 2004 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. for temporary injunction. The I.A. was contested by the petitioner. Through its order, dated 07.12.2004, the trial Court allowed the I.A. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed C.M.A.No.2 of 2005 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Sathupally. The C.M.A. was dismissed on 26.04.2005. Hence, this revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The notice sent to the respondent was not served as yet. The trial Court discussed the matter at some length and took the view that the respondent is in possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. The respondent placed reliance upon Ex.A1, property tax receipt and Exs.A2 and A3, electricity consumption bills. The petitioner did not place any material to the contrary. The order of temporary injunction was affirmed by the lower appellate Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner is not able to satisfy this Court to take a different view. At any rate, no interim order was passed by this Court, when the revision was admitted in the year 2005. The result is that the order of temporary injunction is operating against the petitioner for the past five years. At this length of time, the same cannot be disturbed. Hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed. In case the suit is not disposed of as yet, the trial Court shall dispose of the same, as early as possible. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:27.08.2009 kdl