1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3250 OF 2009 Sanjay s/o Limbaji Manwar ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. ... Respondents. -------- Smt. M.A. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri. N.B. Khandare, Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri. S.S. Deogude, Advocate for respondent No.3. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATE: 3rd NOVEMBER 2009 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The petitioner was transferred by an order dated 28-4-2009 by the Secretary, Vivekanand Education Society Aurangabad from Khultabad to Paithan where the management runs another institution. 2 3) Affidavit-in-reply is filed by the Inspector, on behalf of the Deputy Director of Vocational Education and Training. The deponent states that the proposal of transfer for approval was submitted to the respondent No.2 herein which was received by the office of the deponent on 5-8-2009. The petitioner was already relieved from Khultabad and joined at Paithan. The respondent No.2, according to the deponent, granted post-facto approval on conditions as mentioned in the approval letter. We have perused the approval letter. The petitioner's transfer would be operational up to 30th April 2010. Though the petitioner was not paid salary in time, learned counsel Mrs. Kulkarni, now makes a statement that salary of the petitioner has been paid. 4) The management should be cautioned in matters of payment of salary in time and in future shall resort to action strictly in accordance with law. 3 5) At present we find that the grievances of the petitioner are redressed. In the light of the affidavit-in-reply filed and the submissions advanced we find that, the petition could be disposed of. 6) The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rs/ wp.3250.09