THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1624 of 2010. M/s Rajesh Kumar Singh & Associates, Village Ganga Kinare, Raiwala, Dehradun, District DEhradun, through its Power of Attorney Holder Seva Ram Virmani, S/O Sri Ashanand Virmani. … Petitioner. Vs. Uttarakhand Power Corporation Ltd., through its Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division, Shail Vihar, Rishikesh, District Dehradun. …Respondent. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. B.D.Upadhyay, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent. Date September 22, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Interim Relief Application No. 7928 of 2010) Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent to provide new electricity connection in accordance with law. During the course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer that a direction may be given to the respondent-authority to take a decision on the application of the petitioner, which is pending for disposal for grant of electric connection. It is stated in paragraph no. 7 of the writ petition that the petitioner had applied for new electricity connection for commercial purposes. In the above facts and circumstances, the appropriate authority of the respondent is directed to decide the application of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP