IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39871 of 2008 VIKASH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 16.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The written report could itself indicate that the injuries which were caused to Rajanti Devi and Umesh were not intended to be inflicted on them. The petitioner was not intending to fire or kill the informant. Two injuries were caused due to accidental mis-firing . It is true that the injuries were very serious with regard to Rajanti Devi, but Umesh had stated that the petitioner did not fire which hit him. Contention is that it may not be a case under Section 307 IPC and at best it could be a case under Section 326 IPC. Be that a as it may, as per contention, let the petitioner, namely, Vikash Yadav be released from custody on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Jehanabad, in connection with Ghoshi P.S.Case No.53/2008, Trial No.1988/2008. SKBOSE (Dharnidhar Jha)