IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.14734-M of 2010 Date of Decision:22.12.2010 Sham Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Ms. Harpinder Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Mr. N.K. Manchanda, Advocate for respondents No.5 to 7. Mr. Sanjeev Roy, Advocate for respondents No.8 and 9. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for issuance of direction to respondents No.3 and 4 to register criminal case under Sections 366/366-A/376/313/120-B IPC against respondents No.4 to 9. Upon notice, reply by way of affidavit of Barjinder Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Guruharsahai on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 has been filed. As per the said reply, during inquiry by SHO, PS Sadar Fazilka, Chhindo daughter of the petitioner got recorded her statement that she remained in the house of her Bhua for about one and half year. Sher Singh son of her Bhua leveled allegations of theft and moved complaint in Police Station Sadar Fazilka. Due to pressure by her family members, she moved application against Sher Singh son of Surain Singh resident of Nuran. She is major and understands everything. Due to allegations of theft, she moved the application but now she does not Crl. M. No.14734-M of 2010 -2- want any proceedings regarding the allegations levelled in her statement given before Police of Police Station Mamdot. True translation of her statement dated 28.12.2009 has also been placed on record as Annexure R- 3/T. In view of the reply filed by the State, no further order is called for. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed being devoid of merit. 22.12.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE