THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 18786 OF 2009 Dated: 24-06-2010 Between: Nuthi Vijaya Rani ... PETITIONER AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Superintendent of Police, Khammam District, Khammam and five others ... RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 18786 OF 2009 ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks directions by way of mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in not providing police protection in respect of his landed property admeasuring Ac.0.09 guntas in Survey No.727/1 corresponding to old Survey No.727 situated at Vengala Rao Colony, Paloncha, Khammam District which is the subject matter of suit in O.S No.386 of 2009 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothagudem, Khammam District as arbitrary and illegal. The petitioner has filed the said suit for injunction and obtained ex parte injunctioin in I.A No. 440 of 2009 on 16-07-2009. In this writ petition, it is his grievance that in spite of such an injunction granted in his favour, there is interference by respondent Nos.4 to 6 and further there is no protection provided by the police for implementing the injunction orders. A detailed counter affidavit is filed by respondent Nos.4 to 6 denying various allegations made by the petitioner. They also claim title and possession over the suit schedule property on the ground that they have purchased the same from the husband of the petitioner. They have denied the possession of the petitioner on the suit schedule property and it is further stated that they have filed a counter in the said I.A seeking vacation of the ex parte injunction order. It is also stated that the petitioner has filed an application for grant of police protection before the same Court. As much as the order passed by the trial Court is only an ad interim order and further a counter is already filed disputing the title and possession of the petitioner which is the subject matter of enquiry by the trial Court in I.A No.440 of 2009, no direction can be granted by this Court at this stage. There is yet another ground to reject the claim of the petitioner. The petitioner has already moved an application for grant of police protection before the Court below. In that view of the matter, the petitioner has to pursue the said application before the Court below and simultaneously she cannot seek any direction for police protection from this Court. For the aforesaid reasons, I do not find any merit in this writ petition for grant of direction as prayed for by the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. However, the application filed by the petitioner in I.A No. 440 of 2009 and also the application filed for grant of police protection shall be decided independently uninfluenced by any of the observations made in this order. R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 24-06-2010 ks