IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13121 of 2009 GYANI SINGH @ GYANDEO SINGH @ GYANENDRA SINGH son of Ram Sarekh Singh Resident of village katridih,P.S.katri Sarai,Distt.Nalanda Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.18366 of 2009 TUNTUN SINGH son of late Ram Udit Singh, resident of village- May, P.S.- Warsaliganj, Dist.-Nawada. Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.30132 of 2009 CHUNCHUN SINGH son of Girijanandan Singh, resident of village- Makanpur, P.S.-Warsaliganj, Dist.-Nawada. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 20.8.2009. All the above three applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order because they have arisen out of one occurrence. The petitioners are accused of a case which has been registered for the offences under sections 120B and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. Prayer for bail of petitioner Gyani Singh @ Gyandeo Singh @ Gyanendra Singh (Cr.Misc. No.13121 of 2009) was rejected earlier on 18.9.2008 vide Cr.Misc. No.7638 of 2008. Prayer is being renewed because, according to him, there is no substantial progress in the trial and there is no possibility that the case would culminate within a short period. By order dated 19.5.2009 a report regarding stage of trial was called for which has been received. The report mentions that twenty prosecution witnesses including the informant out of thirty two - 2 - witnesses have already been examined. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer for bail of petitioner Gyani Singh @ Gyandeo Singh @ Gyanendra Singh. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is again rejected. Taking into considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of other petitioners of Cr.Misc.Nos. 18366 and 30132 of 2009 is also rejected. However, the trial court would expedite the trial and would not give unnecessary adjournments to the parties. Md.S. (Shyam Kishore Sharma,J.)