IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3011 of 2009 KRISHANDEO PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4. 17.04.2009 Heard leaned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. This writ application is being disposed at this stage with the consent of the counsels for the petitioner and the State of Bihar. The petitioner is aggrieved by appointment of a person junior to him as Acting Headmaster of the State Subsidised High School, Akbarpur, District Nawadah. The petitioner claims that he has been working as Acting Headmaster and discharging duties of that post. There is no legal right in the petitioner to demand appointment as Acting Headmaster. Simultaneously it is the obligation of the respondents to appoint a regular Headmaster in accordance with the rules. This litigation is being generated by resorting to adhocism creating heart burning and opportunity for the actors involved to vile away their time in litigation instead of devoting it to their duties in the School as teacher. This writ application is disposed with the observation that from the date that the petitioner presents a copy of this order before the concerned respondents, a regular Headmaster shall be appointed within a period of two weeks for the school in question. After expiry of the period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of present order any ad hoc arrangement made by appointment of Incharge Headmaster, whoever it may, shall cease. No duties shall be performed by any person as Acting Headmaster with all its attending consequences for the School for which the responsibility shall lie with the respondents themselves. Appointment on the post of Headmaster thereafter shall be made expeditiously and strictly in accordance with the rules. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)