1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1393 OF 2010. (Nagpur District Shala Karmachari Credit .vrs. State of Maharashtra and others. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 08, 2010. Shri S.D. Shukla, learned counsel for petitioner states that in affidavit – reply filed by respondent no.2 it is stated that said respondent has withdrawn impugned show cause notice issued under Section 78[1] of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. According to him, the petition therefore, has become infructuous, and can be disposed of keeping all the contentions open. Shri A.D. Mohgaonkar, learned counsel for proposed intervenors however, points out that he has filed application for intervention. According to him the withdrawal of notice is not proper. 2 Shri Shukla, learned counsel has also tendered a reply to that application for intervention. Learned A.G.P. has appeared for respondent nos.1 and 2 in the matter. It is apparent that grievance of intervenors [proposed] cannot be considered as the respondent no.2 has withdrawn the notice which is impugned in the present petition. Thus, keeping all the contentions of the parties, including that of the proposed intervenors open, present Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous, with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.