$§§mi§ Emmi ‘ 1 Uf. \(im‘ (T \*, IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR V\/.P..No..$..%..rbf.3.. ...../2005 Petitioner :- r' Abdul Kadir Qureshi, aged 48 years, S/o Hazi Abdul Jabbar Khan, Assistant , Grade-H, gm. M ......3 Hgft/QfK ....... Resgondents— (1‘ The ReglstrarGen ‘DfaE 2 {Q ............. x‘ ) 4N“ n. u; Office ofthe District and Session Judge, Durg C.G. VERSUS i,:{H Of High Court ofChhattisgarh Bilaspur(C.G.) /'2. The District and Session Judge, Durg C.G. L)2 Shri Bodhan Lat Swarnkar, Recentfy promoted as Assistant Accountant, Office ofthe District and Session Judge, Durg (CG) Writ petition under Article 226/227 ofconstitution of India. : eré £ / XI-HC—22 25-1 1 -2005 Shri Somkant Vermav. learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Akhil Agarwal, PLf The present petition f‘Ile to what is the promotion p promoted. The/petition is so from the petition. The petit documents. 'ln View of foregoing, extraordinary jurisdiction in ex Constitution of indie; .The petition is accordin \ is at liberty to file a detaimd su 7 ll- .7 g Sd/- vi». i. Sau'sh K. Agni-ham ‘ Priya 3r the State. d by the petitioner does not indicate as Ioiicy except that juniors have been. skeleton as nothing can be made out on is devoid of merit and necessary this Court is unable to exercise its ercise of power under Article 226 of the gly dismissed. However, the petitioner ostantive petition if so adVised. Judge [stew