IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY MONDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2011 / 27TH ASHADHA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3627 of 2005() ------------------------------------ CC.2626/2005 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 4: ---------------------------------- 1. PUNEETH ANANTH, THE MANAGER (NATIONAL CUSTOMER RELATIONS), MARKETING AND SALES OFFICER, A.30, MOHAN CORPORATIVE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,MADURAI ROAD, NEW DELHI-44 (ADDRESS AS SHOWN IN THE COMPLAINT). 2. VISHAL, THE MANAGER (AREA SALES, SOUTH), A.30, MOHAN CORPORATIVE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,MADHURAI ROAD, NEW DELHI-44.(ADDRESS AS SHOWN IN THE COMPLAINT). 3. V. RAMACHANDRAN, THE REGIONAL MANAGER, SOUTH REGIONAL OFFICE, NP.54, DEVELOPMENT PLOT, EKKADUTHUNGAL, THIRUVIKA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, CHENNAI-32. (ADDRESS AS GIVEN IN THE COMPLAINT). BY ADV. SRI.B.RAMAN PILLAI SRI.GEORGE PHILIP SRI.R.ANIL SRI.RAJU RADHAKRISHNAN SRI.ANIL K.MOHAMMED RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT & STATE: ----------------------------------- 1. RENJIT GOPINATH, 39/5022, JAYA VIHAR, R. MADHAVAN NAIR ROAD, ELAMKULAM, COCHIN-16. 2. STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV.SRI.K.R.SUNIL R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.B.VINOD THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss CRMC. NO.3627/2005 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES ANNEX.A:- CERTIFIED COPY OF THE COMPLAINT IN CC. 2626/2005 OF THE COURT OF THE JFCM-I, ERNAKULAM DTD. 29.6.2005. ANNEX.B:- COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO.7. IN OP. 230/2005 DTD. 20.6.2005. DTD. 20.6.05. ANNEX.C:- COPY OF THE DOCUMENT REPLIED UPON BY THE IST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES NIL:- TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE tss B.P. RAY, J. ........................................... Crl.M.C. NO.3627 OF 2005 ............................................. Dated this the 18th day of July, 2011. O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the defacto complainant and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. Petitioners are the accused in C.C.No.2626/2005 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Ernakulam for the offences punishable under Sections 406,420 and 120(B) IPC. 3. The defacto complainant states that the matter has been settled out of court and he has no grievance against the petitioners or any of the accused persons. If the petitioners and defacto complainant/respondent No.1 make a statement within two weeks from today to that effect before the learned Magistrate and if the learned Magistrate is satisfied that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, then he shall close the matter. Since the matter has been settled, the petitioners shall file an application to recall the non bailable warrant issued against Crl.M.C. NO.3627 OF 2005 : 2 : them along with an application under Section 205 Cr.P.C. If such applications are filed, non bailable warrant issued against the petitioners shall be recalled and the petitioners shall be permitted to represent through their counsel to plead their innocence. Crl.M.C. is disposed of accordingly. Sd/= B.P. RAY, JUDGE. /true copy/ P.S. to Judge cl