MC 3164/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KOTISWAR SINGH Heard Mr.D.K.Sarmah, learned counsel for the applicants as well as Mr. R.P.Sarm ah, learned counsel for the respondent/writ petitioner in the Misc. application. In the misc. application, it has been contended by the counsel f or the applicants that the interim order was passed on 05.09.2011 and for vacati ng the aforesaid interim order, the present Misc. application was filed on 16.11 .2011. So far the aforesaid application has remained undisposed of. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that in view of the p rovisions of Article 226(3) of the Constitution of India, since the Misc. applic ation has not been disposed of within the period of 14 days, by operation of law , the interim order passed would stand automatically vacated. In view of the specific provisions under Article 226(3) of the C onstitution of India, by operation of law, the interim order dated 5.9.2011 shal l be deemed to have been vacated. However, in spite of the aforesaid order, it i s provided that any selection or appointment made to the posts in issue in the w rit petition will be subject to the final result of the writ petition. Misc. case is allowed.