'% s.^a s W.P.( C) No. 5123 Of 2011 PETITIONER RBSPONDENTS 1) 2) 3) Smt. Meena Bai, W/o Shri Bishambhar, aged about 50 years, R/o Village Ainlidih., Raipur, Talisil aad District Raipur (C.G.). State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary Revenue Departnient, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur(C.G.). The Superinteadent of Police, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.). Additional CoUector, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. :Hoa'bIe Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) < Present:- Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Meera Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, P.L. forthe State/respondents. ORDER 1. 2. 3. 5. (Passedou 05/09/2011} By fhis petition ynder Article 226 of the Constitution of India petitioner has challenged fhe legality aad propriety of the order dated 11/2/2011 passed by Additional CoUector, Raipur (C.G.) in Order No./23/vachak/A.Kle./(Ra)/2011 whereby Additional CoUector, Raipur (C.G.) has directed for transfer of Govt. land to Superintendent of PoUce, Raipur for coastruction of police station aad residence. Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Sr, Advocate wifh Ms. Meera Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner aad Ms. Saageeta Mishra, P.L. for the State/respondents are heard. Leamed counsel for the petitioner subinits that aforesaid land was initiaUy service land of Kotwar and Kotwar has executed wiU in favour of the petitioner and petitioner is in possession. Mutation proceeding is also peading before the Board ofRevenue. On due conslderation, I do not fiiid any ground for graut of aay direction to auy of fhe aufhority, however, petitioner is at Uberty to avail reinedy available under the law, with fhis observation petition is disxaissed. No order as to costs. I.A. No. 01 is also disruissed. T.P. Sharma ^ Judge -<r" unsEin"