IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20307 of 2011 Jagdish Yadav, Son of Sri Sukhai Yadav, Resident of Village :- Muradiha, P.S. :- Maharajganj, District :- Faizabad, State :- Uttar Pradesh. …..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Chaudhary Prem Kr. Thakur, Advocate. For the State : APP. ----------- 02/ 13.07.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is accused of the case in which allegation is that 24 kgs. of Ganja was recovered. Grievance of the petitioner is that he is in custody since 27.12.2006, but only two seizure list witnesses who have also been declared hostile have been examined. It has also been submitted that there is no substantial progress in the case and there is no likelihood of the progress in near future. Considering the provisions of Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act, prayer for bail of the above named petitioner was rejected and there 2 is no change of circumstances. Considering this, prayer for bail is again rejected. However, the court below see that trial should be expedited and concluded without delay, considering this fact that the petitioner is in custody since 27.12.2006. kksinha/- (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)