DAO No. 37 of 2006 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. (Delay Condonation Application No. 4125 of 2006) Heard Sri Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for the appellant on the delay condonation application and perused the affidavit filed in support thereto. I find sufficient ground to condone the delay in filing the appeal. Accordingly, the delay condonation application is allowed. The delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. Heard on the point of admission and perused the record. Heard Sri Ashish Joshi, leaned counsel for the appellant, Sri S.K. Jain, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the judgment passed by the Workman Compensation Commissioner. The Workman Compensation Commissioner has assessed the evidence filed by the parties thoroughly and then has recorded the categorical finding that the claimants are entitled for an amount of Rs. 3,32,580.00 as compensation. It is not disputed that the driver of the bus died during the course of the discharge of the duties. I do not find any infirmity in the impugned judgment and award passed by the Workman Compensation Commissioner. The impugned judgment and award does not require any interference by way of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Consequently, the stay application No. 4126 of 2006 stands dismissed. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) 17.10.2006 ASWAL