Crl. Misc. No.M-26806 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-26806 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 13, 2010 Satnam Singh …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and another …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.R.K. Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks a direction to the police of District Faridkot to take legal action against Surjit Singh and others for having got an agreement of sale executed from the father of the petitioner on November 12, 1987 under the influence of liquor. Petitioner claims that he had become owner of the property pursuant to the sale deed executed by Hansa Singh in favour of the petitioner. Crl. Misc. No.M-26806 of 2010 [2] When questioned, whether any sale deed has been executed in favour of Surjit Singh etc. on the basis of an agreement of sale dated November 12, 1987, counsel for the petitioner informs that no sale deed has been executed but the said persons claimed to be in possession on the basis of agreement of sale. Prima facie, it appears to be a case of civil liability and a dispute regarding recovery of possession on the basis of title. The petitioner claims that cognizable is made out. Without expression of any opinion on merits of the case and without forming an opinion whether the cognizable offence is made out, the petition is disposed of with a direction that SSP, Faridkot, will get the matter looked into and in case some cognizable offence is made out, necessary action will be taken otherwise, it will be open to him to drop the proceedings with advise to the petitioner to avail the remedy before the civil Court. September 13, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE