IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2188 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 2188 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO. 2188 OF 2008 IN IN IN CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 439 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 439 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 439 OF 2008 1. Nikhil Shamrao Parandkar & anr. ] .. Applicants/ Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra & 3 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. S.G. Deshmukh for the applicants/petitioners. Mr. Vinay Sonpal, AGP, for the respondents No.1 & 2. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED: 16TH JANUARY, 2009 P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. This matter is listed for Rule on interim relief. The petitioner shall complete 58 years of his age on 31st January, 2009. Therefore, the petitioner has moved this Petition for interim relief. According to the petitioner, the Government Resolution which reduces the age of retirement from 60 years to 58 years is not proper, just and valid in view of the provisions of Section 4 of the Employees of Private Schools : 2 : (Conditions of Service Regulation) Act, 1977. 3. We are not in favour of granting interim injunction because this point has already been considered by two Division Benches of this Court earlier in Writ Petitions No.1152 of 2006 and No.2455 of 2003. Both the Benches have considered the Government Resolution dated 27th February, 2003. In view of the two Division Benches consistently being against the petitioner, we are not inclined to grant any interim relief. Interim rule stands discharged. 4. Civil Application, accordingly, stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- [D.B. [D.B. [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] BHOSALE, J.] BHOSALE, J.] [S.B. [S.B. [S.B. MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.]