HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION No.3607 & 4620 of 2008 Dated 24-03-2011 CRIMINAL PETITION No.3607 of 2008 Between: G. Harinarayana ……..Petitioner. And: Mr. Gerard Rodrigues and another ………Respondents CRIMINAL PETITION No.4620 of 2008 Between: G. Uma Sundari ……..Petitioner. And: Mr. Gerard Rodrigues and another ………Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION No.3607 & 4620 of 2008 COMMON ORDER: Both the petitions are filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C for quashing the proceedings in Crime No.203 of 2008 of Narayanaguda Police Station. The petitioner in Criminal Petition No.4620 of 2008 is A-2 in Crime No.203 of 2008 of Narayanaguda Police Station. The petitioner in Criminal Petition No.3607 of 2008 is A.4 in Crime No.203 of 2008 of the same police station and they are the wife and husband. The 1st respondent herein has lodged a complaint on 4.5.2008 alleging that at 8.15 p.m, when she was watching the T.V in her house, G. Madhavi, D/o. G. Harinara forcibly came inside her house and started fighting with his wife who is the General Secretary of their apartment regarding the car parking issue. As she was crossing her limits by putting her legs on his center table and using filthy language, he asked her to get out from his house and bolted his door from inside. Again at 8.30 p.m, she came along with her watchman Narasimha and started Ringing their bell and knocking their door very harshly. As he could not bear the noise, they opened the door and found G. Madhuri and Narasimha and they started arguing and barged inside their house and started man handling him. As he went back on Narasimha saying who is he to be involved, he started beating him up and immediately G. Madhavi involved saying “do you beat his watchman” she also started man handling him and one of their neighbour Mr. E. Pavithran who resides at Flat No. 106 came in between to rescue them from fighting but all his efforts went in vain and Madhavi and Narasimha want to stuck to their agenda then G. Madhuri Picked up one of the flower pot kept beside their main door and threw it on him. Immediately, he closed the door and the pot broke against the door. After some time again they came along with Mrs. G. Uma Sundari and started abusing him and beating Mrs. G. Uma Sundari held his throat by her hand and said she will kill him. Therefore, from the averments made in the complaint, it is clear that the specific allegations are made against both the petitioners to instigate Madhavi and Narasimha to kill the complainant. More over the complaint is only at the stage of the investigation and prima facie basing on the averments made in the complaint does not warrant any quashing of the proceedings at this stage. Hence, both the petitions are dismissed. ______________________ P.DURGA PRASAD,J. Date:24.03.2011. Gk. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION No.3607 & 4620 of 2008 Dated 24-03-2011 Gk.