============================================================== FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 60 OF 2004. APPLICATION NO. 60 OF 2004. APPLICATION NO. 60 OF 2004. IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3232 OF 1998. PETITION NO. 3232 OF 1998. PETITION NO. 3232 OF 1998. ============================================================== Ms. Sapana Samant i/b H.S. Shreepad Murthy for the applicant. Mr. S.A. Joshi i/b Sudhir Hardikar for the respondent No.2. CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED: 26TH JULY, 2005. P.C.: . Heard counsel for the parties. . This is an application filed by the petitioner for restoration of the main Writ Petition which was dismissed for want of prosecution without reference to the Court. As averred, the petitioners came to know about the same very late. The matter is pertaining to landlord and tenant relationship. The respondent is in occupation of the premises. . Therefore, considering the averments made in the Civil Application and in the interest of justice, in my opinion, a case is made out for condoning the delay and for restoration. In view of this, prayer clauses (a) and (b) of the Civil Application are granted. . Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]