CLCON No. 88 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Lalit Miglani, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, Advocate for the respondent. This Court by an order dated 23rd February, 2011 had directed the respondents to decide the representation of the applicant by a reasoned and speaking order. The Court further directed that if the applicant was entitled to be given post retirement benefits, the same should also be released within the same period. Since the order of the Court was not complied with, the present contempt application has been filed. A counter affidavit has been filed indicating therein that by an order dated 27th May, 2011, the pension of the applicant has been sanctioned and that the Account Officer, Pension by a letter dated 1st June, 2011 has asked the applicant to comply with the certain formalities so that pension could be released. In the light of the aforesaid, it is expected that the applicant would now comply with the remaining formalities so that pension could be released. In the light of the aforesaid, notices are discharged and the contempt application is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 26.07.2011 Shiv