HIGHCOURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DB: Appiicant Hon'ble Shri Sunil Kumar Sinha & Hon'bte Shri Radhe Shvam Sharma. JJ. M.C.C. No.263/2011 Ramesh Kumar Shukla, Aged about 70 years, S/o. Late Shri Ram Swaroop Shukla, R/o. Ganj Bans Tall, Behind Deshbandhu English School, Raipur (CG) Respondents Vs. 1. 2. State of Chhattisgarh Tiarough the Secretary, Nagariya Prashashan Vibhag, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan Raipur (CG) The Nagar Palika Nigam Raipur Through its Chief Municipat Officer Raipur (CG) ^ Present: Shri Sanjeev Verma, counsel for the applicant. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawer for the State/respondent No. 1 . ORAL ORDER (04.07.2011.) Heard on I.A. No.01/2011, an appticatiQn for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application. 2. According to the office report, the restoration application is barred by 69 days of limitation. 3. On due consideration ofthe submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the grounds taken in the application for condonation of delay, the same is allowed and th&.delay in filing the restoration application is hereby condoned. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the parties are also heard on the restoration applicatipn (M.C.C.No.263/2011). 5. A perusal of the record would show that on 11.11 .2010 a peremptory order in relation to removal of default was passed by this Court and consequently the writ appeal was dismissed without reference to the Bench as the peremptory order was not complied by the appellant/applteant. 6. On due consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties and the grounds taken in the restoration application, we are satisfied that the non-compliance of the peremptory order in the time specified in the orcter passed was based on bonafide grounds and the restoration application deserves to be allowed. 7. Accordingly, M.C.C. No.263/2011 is allowed and Writ Appeal No.653/2010 is restored to its original number. Bini Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- Radhe Shyam Sharma Judge