IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 8777/2008 Decided on:9.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Hitender Singh. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. V.D. Khidta, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No.1 to 3. Respondent No.4 already ex parte. ____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). It is not disputed that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in Pramod Kumar versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, CWP No. 3392 of 2010, decided on 18.8.2010. 2. According to the petitioner, he did not get an opportunity to present his case before the University. In case he has still any dispute with regard to the factual 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 position, it will be open to him to present his version before the second respondent, in which case second respondent will consider the matter afresh affording opportunity for hearing the petitioner within four months. 3. Consequently, the present petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 9.12.2010 *awasthi*