-^^SsiSSW^--^ RF?i!j~^ us.i.'Siit'S ^Ffo<9 R6o PETITIONER ^ ....;-&y \€^. .';>•'' ..-y .••''' .ft'-'" ^-f' Hemant Kumar Sahu S/o. Shri years, Assistant Teacher, unar (C.G.: 1. Sfate of Chhattisgrh, Through /.•l^^^l^ /2. ^3. ^^nt i.K.S. Bhawan. Raipur (C.G. Public Instruction Govt. Raiour HI6H COWT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BIUtSPUR W. P.fSl No. 860 of 2007 Petitioner Hemant KumoB' Sahu Versus Reqiondents : Stote of Chhatt'isgarh ond others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K, Ayiihotri. J Present: Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, Adwarte for the petitioner. Mr. Satish Supta. Dy. 6ovt. Advocate for the State/respondents. } 'i^'! ''..' ORDER 0>assed on this 13th &ay of February, 2007) 1. The petitioner vms oppointed vide order dated 18.2.87 (Anne?aire P/l) as Assistdnt Teacher on fixed poy scale of Rs. 300/-. Aft-er compfetion of one year probation, he was gnwited regular pay scote of Rs. 545-925/- 2. Laamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved m the case is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to negulnr pcy scote w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The isaie involved, herein uws considered by •the Madhyo Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur m O.A. No. 2745/89 (Atadhukant Yadu and 56 o'thers Vs. Slurte of M.P. & others), wherein it was held that the simitarly si-hjoted teachers are entitled to regutar pcy scate w.e.f. the date of initial oppointment. The matter was taken-up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court'. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Sjpreme Court upholding the decision of ^' r the Tribunat to Ihe effect that the Tedchers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular poy scale from date of initial oppointment. 4. Leamed counset dppeoB'ing for the petitioner •ftjrther submits thfft •this Court-, while considering 1+ie some issue in Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhatfisgarh & o-thers C^.P. (5) No. 5976 of 2006) by order dated 7-11-2006, has granted regukir (wiy scale w.e.f. the date of initial cppointment. 5. Learned counsel dppearing for the parties jomtly ajbmit that -this case is squarety covered by -the decision of this Court' in •Hie case of Sushil Tiwori & others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh & others (Supra). 6. Tn vfcw of That, this petition is allowed 'vn the saffle terms. No onter as To costs. Babtu Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^