IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-29046 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 30.11.2011. Anoop Aggarwal alias Anoop Bansal ...... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Vipul Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Palwinder Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate, for respondent No.4. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking direction to respondent No.2 not to harass the petitioner at the instance of respondents No.3 and 4. State counsel assisted by Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate, counsel for respondent No.4 has stated that FIR No.344 dated October 4th, 2011 under Sections 103 and 104 of the Trade Mark Act and Section 420 of Indian Penal Code has been registered in Police Station Civil Lines, District Amritsar against the petitioner at the instance of respondent No.4. Learned state counsel has also stated that neither the Police called petitioner in the Police Station except in the above noted case nor does it propose to call him any further in the present case. In view of this, no action is called for. Disposed of accordingly. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 30.11.2011. SN