mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4662 OF 2009 Shrikant Keru Hagawane Petitioner versus Ashok Keru Hagawane and others Respondents Prashant D. Patil for petitioner. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 21st July 2009 PC :- 1. By the impugned order the defendants have been permitted to amend their written statement. This order is capable of being challenged in an appeal against the decree which may be preferred by the petitioner, if the decree is adverse to the petitioner. Therefore, at this stage, no interference is called for. 2. As amendment has been permitted to be carried out to the written statement, it will be open to the petitioner to apply to the Trial Court for recalling the witnesses who have been already examined. It will be also open to the petitioner to lead further evidence in the light of the amendment. Subject to what is observed above, the writ petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J.)