IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13671 of 2010 KARU RAJAK . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR . ----------- 08. 10.03.2011 Heard the parties. The offence alleged is under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. This application is filed for grant of anticipatory bail. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner made in the complaint is totally false. As a matter of fact, six months prior to the complaint petition informatory petition was filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka with respect to the conduct of the complainant. It is further submitted that petitioner is ready to keep the complaint with full dignity but complainant is not ready to live with him. Learned counsel for the complainant on the other hand submits that there is specific allegation of demand and torture against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the nature of allegation is very serious and as such, petitioner is not deserved for anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)