1 wp7924.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7924 OF 2010 [Kamalbai w/o Anteshwar Shinde vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. A.M. Gaikwad, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. D.V. Tele, AGP for State/Respondents. Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for Resp.No.2. Mr. B.A. Darak, Advocate for Resp. No.5. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 6TH SEPTEMBER, 2011 PER COURT : Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file the Election Petition as provided under Section 15 of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958. He submits that, the time which is consumed in prosecuting this writ petition may be considered by the concerned Court while entertaining the prayer for 2 wp7924.10 condonation of delay. He further submits that, while entertaining the Election Petition filed by the petitioner herein, the concerned Court will consider that the petitioner has spent considerable time in prosecuting this writ petition. In my opinion, the contention of the petitioner is required to be considered by the concerned Court while entertaining the Election Petition. 2. It is true that, this Court has entertained the writ petition and issued notices to the respondents and at one stage even thought to dispose of the matter here itself finally. However, being Election Petition, certain documents are required to be filed, certain evidence is required to be led and in that view of the matter, the petitioner was asked to file the Election Petition. Accordingly, he seeks liberty to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to 3 wp7924.10 file the Election Petition. Writ Petition is disposed of, as withdrawn with liberty to file the Election Petition as prayed. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/SEP11