drp {1} Cri. Application No.2063/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2063 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL REVISION NO.115 OF 2011 Dilip Bhimsing Wagh APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mrs. Monica R.Dahat, Advocate for the applicant Mr. N.R.Shaikh, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 6 th May 2011 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Issue notice to the respondents. Learned APP accepts notice for respondent No. 1. Notice of respondent No.2 dispensed with. 2. By this application, the applicant has prayed for suspension of his substantive sentence awarded by learned JMFC, Chalisgaon in Summary Criminal Case No.2/1997 and confirmed by learned Sessions Judge, Jalgaon in Criminal Appeal No. 67/2004. The applicant is convicted u/s 279 and 304A of the drp {2} Cri. Application No.2063/2011 Indian Penal Code and he is sentenced to suffer RI for six months and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- and RI for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/- with default stipulation, respectively. 3. The applicant has deposited the fine amount in the trial court. It is informed that the applicant was on bail during the pendency of the trial so also during the pendency of the criminal appeal and he is taken in custody on 03.05.2011, when his appeal came to be dismissed. Considering the fact that the applicant was on bail throughout and as he has also deposited the fine amount, the applicant deserves to be released on bail. In the premise, the applicant be released on bail on the same terms and conditions on which he was released on bail by the trial court, however, on furnishing fresh surety and on executing fresh PR bond. The bail to be furnished before the trial court. Application stands disposed of accordingly. Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A11/criapln2063-11 drp {3} Cri. Application No.2063/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION NO.115 OF 2011 Dilip Bhimsing Wagh APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Another RESPONDENTS ....... Mrs. Monica R.Dahat, Advocate for the applicant Mr. N.R.Shaikh, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 6 th May 2011 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. On the oral request, learned counsel for applicant is allowed to delete respondent No.2, at her risk. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Issue notice to the respondent. Learned APP accepts notice for the respondent. 2. Call for record and proceedings. List the revision for admission after receipt of the Record and proceedings. Parties are put to notice that this revision is likely to be disposed of finally at the stage of admission, on the next date/s. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A11/criapln2063-11