1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10340 of 2011-D Decided on: 30.11.2011 Promila Thakur .....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others .....Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, and Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No. 1 & 2. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Petitioner is aggrieved, since she has been transferred from Sujao-piploo to Karkoh, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi. Though, the petitioner has taken several contentions, it is also pointed out, on facts, that she is widow and she has to look after her in-laws, who are in advance age. It is also pointed out that there are vacancies available at Brarta-Chowk, Maseran and Logni, Tehsil Sarkaghat, District Mandi. 2 2. There will be a direction to the second respondent to preferentially accommodate the petitioner in any one of the vacancies pointed out by her. In case, the vacancies are available, as on today, the needful action in that regard shall be done within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the second respondent. As and when the petitioner is relieved, she may not be compelled to join the transferred station and it will be open for her to avail leave of the kind due, till the orders, as above, are passed by the second respondent. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Authenticated copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. November 30, 2011 (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (hl/priti) Judge.