1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 124 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra & others ,, APPLICANTS Versus Anil s/o Virbhadra Sakharkar .. RESPONDENT WITH REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 125 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra & others .. APPLICANTS Versus Baguji Kacharu Pundge .. RESPONDENT Shri V.B. Wagh with Shri D.G. Nagode, Advocates for the applicants. Shri M.D.Shinde, Advocate holding for Shri S.S.Pawar, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 27th August, 2009. PER COURT : 2 1 Heard. 2 These are the applications seeking review of the judgment passed by this court on 3-4-2009. Perused the applications. No new ground is raised or no new fact is disclosed in the applications which was not within the knowledge of the applicants when the matter was taken up for disposal. There is no ground for reviewing the order passed by this court. Applications are devoid of substance. Applications stand rejected. (R.M.BORDE) JUDGE ******* dyb/revappln124.09.odt