IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ No.42 of 2011 Md. Jakaullah Versus The State Of Bihar &Ors. ---------------------------------- 4 20.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioners is that Taraiyan P.S. Case No.91 of 2010 registered on 1.9.2010 for the offences under Sections 147,148,149,323,324,325,326,307 and 302 of the I.P.C. has not been properly investigated with respect to the role of respondents no.8 to 11 in the alleged commission of the offence since the injured persons have given statement against the respondents no.8 to 11 with respect to their involvement in the commission of the offence. As such the respondents no.8 to 11 deserve to be arrested. The learned counsel appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the submission and submits that it appears that the petitioner wants that the investigation of the aforesaid case should be concluded properly. As a matter of fact, the investigation of the case is being properly done considering all aspects of the matter in order to find out the truth of the allegations. Notwithstanding the rival submissions it goes without saying that in the interest of justice the investigation of the case be completed expeditiously without unnecessary delay as per law and on completion of the investigation police report be submitted forthwith. However, with regard to the grievance, if any, with respect to the investigation it will be open for the petitioner to bring 2 to the notice of the higher police official with cogent information for their remedial measure. With the aforesaid observations writ petition is disposed of. AnilKrSinha (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)