IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14615 of 2010 BINOD MEHTA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Adv. Mr. Dhanjay Kr. Gupta, Adv. For the State:- Mr. Jayu Prakash Sharma, Adv. ------------ 2. 9.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by his order of suspension dated 18.3.2009. It is submitted that twice defective charge sheets have been issued in absence of necessary materials recommending revocation of the suspension on 10.11.2009 and 19.11.2009. A final rectified charge sheet has then been issued on 6.2.2010. The submission therefore is that in the facts of the case, there is no sufficient justification to continue with the suspension. Counsel for the State points out from the order dated 14.6.2010 of the District Magistrate that the enquiry officer has been appointed and the proceedings have been directed to be concluded expeditiously within three months. On the facts of the case when charges have been framed in a defective manner not once but twice recommendation for revocation of the suspension made twice, the suspension being in contemplation of the departmental proceedings, this Court considers it prudent to direct revocation of the suspension dated 18.3.2009. This Court makes no observations with regard to the departmental proceedings which are required to be concluded within the time fixed by order dated 14.6.2010, provided the petitioner himself co-operates. The order of suspension dated 18.3.2009 is set aside. Any arrears of subsistence allowance are required to be paid in accordance with law within a maximum period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands allowed to the extent indicated only. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)