IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.660 of 2008 DEEPAK KUMAR GUPTA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 14.5.2008 Heard. This is a case under section 20 of the N.D.P.S.Act. 45 tablets of opium is said to have been recovered from the photo shop of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it is a concocted case. There have been various irregularities and illegalities in holding raid and seizing the article. The informant Officer In-charge did not have jurisdiction to conduct any raid at the P.O. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State opposed the submissions and contended that if any irregularity or illegality has been committed in instituting this case, the petitioner can get the benefit of those irregularities by filing a quashing application or point out at the time of framing of charge. Narcotic substance has been recovered from his possession and does not deserve bail. Considering recovery of narcotic drug and psychotropic substance, I do not feel inclined to release the petitioner on bail. His prayer for bail, therefore, is rejected. As suggested by the learned A.P.P., the 2 Surendra/ petitioner may file quashing application or he may ventilate his grievance before the court below at the time of framing of charge regarding illegality or irregularity committed in procedure or regarding false implication of the petitioner. ( Rekha Kumari,J.)