IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50099 of 2008 1. KEDAR JHA 2. Sri Ram Jha Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.12.2008 Heard Mr. A. K. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Mehta, learned A.P.P. The two petitioners, father and son, are not named in the F.I.R. in a case under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The Addl. Sessions Judge, who dismissed the prayer of bail of the petitioner, has of course referred to a huge number paragraphs to state that the witnesses have supported the prosecution and disclosed the name of the petitioner but has not considered the statement that if at all the petitioners were seen participating in the offence or in commission of the offence, the names of the petitioners must have been disclosed by them to the informant. Let petitioners named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur, in connection with Hasanpur P.S. case no.80 of 2007. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )