IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2996 of 2010 MD. ALLAUDDIN HAZAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH VIGILANCE ----------- 03 08.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The allegation against the petitioner mukhiya under the Prevention of Corruption Act is stated to be with regard to a sum of Rs. 4,000/- for which he is stated to be in custody since 6.11.2009. Considering the period of custody and the amount, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge vigilance-II, Patna in connection with Special Case No. 40 of 2009. One of the sureties must be a Government servant and the photographs and proof of residence of the sureties shall be appended to the bail bonds which shall be verified through the local Police before acceptance. In the event of his absconding the court below shall be equally at liberty to proceed appropriately against the sureties apart from the petitioner as the circumstances may warrant. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)