1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5225 OF 2007 Piroza Homi Sanjana & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Munir Merchant for petitioners Ms.Cardozo, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 Mr.Anil Desai for respondent No.5. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 14th January 2008 P.C. . There is no reason to interfere with the orders passed by the Authorities exercising powers under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. 2 The authorities themselves have observed that the entries in the records are for fiscal purposes and do not conclude the issue of right, title and interest of the parties in the immovable properties. Despite the findings which according to Mr.Dani are against the petitioners on some vital issues, to my mind, the petitioner can always approach the competent civil court to establish their right, title and interest in the subject immovable property. The suit would be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law. Needless to state that while deciding the suit, the competent civil court is not going to be bound by the observations which are made by the authorities under the Land Revenue Code. The nature of their jurisdiction being settled, there is no basis for the apprehension. Petition dismissed. 2. Mr.Dani states that the necessary proceedings/suit would be instituted within a 3 period of four weeks from today. To enable the petitioners to apply for appropriate interim relief therein, order of status quo granted by this Court shall continue for a period of four weeks from the date of filing of the suit. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)