^ ^ Zs IN THE HON'BLE HSGH COURT OF C.G. AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.^^No. <^^[0 of 2009 PETITIONERS .^^- ^<e 0\^ ^9 L- :1. 2. ^.^" ,,,^ ^Vs . ^^ '\^..? Smt. Radha Gupta, W/0 Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta, Aged about 40 Years Ashok Kumar Gupta, S/0 Shri Hari das Gupta, Aged about 44 Years Both R/0 Haidibadi, Chirmiri, District Korea (CG) ^"' RESPONDENTS VERSUS :1. 2. Union of India Through: the Secretary. Ministry of Labour Government of India, New Delhi Assistant Provldent Fund Commissioner Employees Provdent Fund Organisation, Regional OfSlce, Biock D, Scheam No. 32, indira Gandh; Vyavsayik Parisar, Pandri Raipur (CG) ^-^ .^ ,fcT/ fi m. ^^ aa^iN L^M ^l 3. Recovery Officer, Employees Provident Fund Organjsation, Regional Office, BIock D, Scheam No. 32, indira Gandhi Vyavsayik Parisar, Pandri Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CPNSTITUTJQN OF INDIA :C—78 ^'^"^T'^lN? ^qi ^T^ ^» \ • Dwpli .^ ^ % ^^r ^i^icri^, •6$xil-(-i<i<o, fs?^rray ...lvi.p.£r..i.:^..,.^./..pjn a^i^r ^^ ('1E^3^?) ^^TW: ^ft^ ^I^? SB: Hon'UeShri Manhidra Mohiin ^H-ivastava. J ^TRfeNN "HFT^ff ^'.fe^' Ti^T^R' ^ ^tf^^ ^?T^T 13-07-2010 Shri Sunita Jain, counset foij the petitioners. Shri Satyendra Singh Rajpi^t, counsel for respandeirt No.1. Shri Pradeep Saxena, coun^el for r^poiidente No.2 anci 3. The petltionere have challer|ged the order ctated 6/6/07 (Annexure A-1) passed by respondent No.2 direcjting recovery of Provident Fund dy©and payabte in favour of the employee^ all^ed to be deposited bytf^ peWoners in their establishment. in the petijBon, petitioners have stated Uiat a re^ew petition has been filed which i^ pending for considera^en. This feictual position has not been disputed in t|ie return fll^d by the respondente. Under these cSrcumstancesl, without commQnting on ttie merite of the case, it would be approprjate to <?irect respondente no.2 and 3 to consicter and pass ordere expeditiously, in |uscordance with law on p^itio»»ei'sreview petition (Annexure P/5) dated12/1jt/08. in case grievance of ttie p^tftjonere te stHI rw^ r<ectr@ased, it wwild be open for the petitioners to take recj; underthe law. With the aforesald directioni aurse to such remedy, as may be avaitebte , the petition te finally disposed off. Sd/- ManindraMohanShrivastava Jude