IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.34766 OF 2011 1.SUKHDEO ROY,S/O BIJU ROY. 2.PRAHLAD ROY,S/O SUKHDEO ROY. 3.RUDAL ROY, S/O SUKDEO ROY. 4.BHOLA ROY, S/O CHINTU ROY. 5.SUKRA ROY, S/O CHINTU ROY. 6.BIRBAL ROY, S/O SONE ROY. 7.LALIT ROY, S/O LATE BALESHWAR ROY. 8.NAVIN ROY, S/O LATE BHUBNESWAR ROY. 9.UCHIT ROY, S/O BINODI ROY. …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR. ………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 02/ 25.10.2011 Heard counsel for the parties. Having regard to the nature of allegation for the offences punishable under Section 307, 379 and 436 of the Indian Penal Code and that the allegation of specific over Act is only against co accused Sukhdeo Roy (petitioner no. 9), Bhola Roy (petitioner no. 4) and Uchit Roy (petitioner no. 9), this Court would direct the petitioners namely Rudal Roy (petitioner no. 3), Sukra Roy (petitioner no. 5), Birbal Roy (petitioner no. 6), Lalit Roy (petitioner no. 7) and Navin Roy (petitioner no. 8) to surrender within a period of four weeks from today and if they do so, they would be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten 2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Dandkhora P.S case No. 25 of 2011 subject to the conditions laid down under Section- 438 (2) Cr. P.C and also subject to the following three conditions:- (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished by the petitioners, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioners will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and their absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of their bail. (iii) The petitioners, in case, are now made accused in any other criminal case, that would itself lead to cancellation of their bail. The prayer of anticipatory bail of Sukhdeo Roy (petitioner no. 1), Prahlad Roy (petitioner no. 2) Bhola Roy (petitioner no. 4) and Uchit Roy ( petitioner no. 9) is hereby rejected. As it is said that the parties have already compromised the 3 matter, the Court below having examined and confirmed this aspect, would consider the prayer for regular bail and if there has been already a compromise, it would also release them on bail. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is disposed of. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)