?sw^^^:!T%^:l'?^^"sy^'?p^t^^B^^^ HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR l:il y Single Bench: Hon'bleShriDilipRaosahebDeshmukh,J. Civil Revision No. 186 of 2008 Vinita Bai, aged about 20 years, W/o Late Shri Narottam Tiwari, R/o Viltage Datan Para, Nagpura, Police Station, Palari, District Raipur (CG) Applicant Claimant Versus Respondents years, Non-claimants 1 Dhaneshwari Bai, aged about 30 W/o Late Ganesh Prasad Tiwari; 2 Tukeshwar Prasad, aged about 08 years, S/o Late Ganesh Prasad Tiwari, 3 Tameshwari Bai,,aged aboutlO years, D/o Late Ganesh Prasad Tiwari, Respondents No.2 & 3 are<minors, through their legal and natural guardian Mother Dhaneshwari Bai, W/o Late Ganesh Prasad Tiwari, Respondents No. 1 to 3 are residents of Village Datan Para, Nagpura, Police Station Patari, Djstrict Raipur (CG) 4 Mansingh Dhruv, S/o Itwari Dhruv 5 Bhagwati Prasad, S/o Chintaram Verma, Respondents 4 and 5 residents of Village Khairi, Police Station Bhathapara (Rural) District Raipur (CG) 6 The New India Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office, Shanti Kunj, Civii Lane, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (CG) Csvil revision under Section 115 of the CPC, 1908. Present: Shri M.K.Bhaduri, counse! for the applicant. ORAL ORDER (Passedon 08.12.2008) This revision is being disposed of finally at the stage ofadmission. (2) The applicant is aggrieved by the order dated 06.11.2008 passed by the 2nd Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (henceforth the 'Tribunal), Baloda Bazar, Distt Raipur (CG) in daims case No.38^007, whereby.an appiication filed by the applicant for disbursement of the ftxed deposit amount v^as rejected. (3) Normally on satisfaction of the genuineness of the purpose for which withdrawal is sought, the Tribuna! should lean in favour of disbursement to the claimant. However, in this case, the Tribunal has, while passing the impugned ^ -^ Priya ^ ^s order, not deait with the purpose for which the applicant required the the amount of compensation which was deposited as fixed deposit. (4) The Tribunal shall pass a speaking order regarding the purpose for which the applicant was seeking withdrwal ofthe amount deposited as a fixed deposit. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge