1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CAS No. 263/2010 in S.A. St. No. 4895/2010 Anandrao Gundo (Dead) Through Lrs Vinod s/o Anandrao Gundo and others Vs. Janrao Ganeshwar (Dead) through Lrs. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- C ORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK, J. DATED : 15th JULY, 2010. 1] Heard Mr. Karmarkar, learned learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Dubey, learned counsel for respondents 1 to 3. 2] Learned counsel for respondents 1 to 3 opposes this Civil Application and states that the applicants are not shown sufficient cause for condoning the huge delay of 1022 days in filing the Second Appeal. 3] However, on hearing the learned counsel for the applicants and on perusal of the Civil Application, it appears that the counsel for the applicants had not informed about the decision in the First Appeal to the applicants after the matter was decided. It is apparent from a reading of paragraph 2 12 of the First Appellate Court's judgment that the counsel engaged by the applicants did not appear before the Court when the matter was called and the matter was decided against the applicants in the absence of the applicants and their counsel. The statements of facts stated in the Civil Application clearly show that there is sufficient cause in belatedly filing the Second Appeal in this Court. However, since the delay in this case is large, the same is condoned, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 750/- (Rs. Seven hundred fifty only) in the High Court Legal Services, Sub Committee, Nagpur, within a period of two weeks. Civil Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of. JUDGE Ambulkar.