[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1325 OF 2007 Yogesh Narayan Bhujbal and ors. ..Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.A.P.Mundargi senior advocate with Mr.V.B. Tapkir for applicants Mr.Ajay Ashok Joshi advocate for respondent no.2-complainant Mr.Rajesh More A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : APRIL 27, 2007 DATE : APRIL 27, 2007 DATE : APRIL 27, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Leave to amend granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant-original accused, learned advocate for the respondent no.2-orignial complainant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The complainant is present in Court in person. Investigating Officer is also present in Court in person. 3. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No. 529 of 2006 of Hadapsar Police Station, Pune. The said case is said to be mainly under Section 307 of IPC. [-2-] The Injury Certificate does not show any fractures nor does it mention any of the injuries as serious or grievous. 4. The complainant and his advocate have stated that the complainant has no objection to the anticipatory bail being granted to the applicant and affidavit of complainant has been tendered to that effect which is taken on record. In the said affidavit, the complainant has stated that complainant and applicant have amicably settled the dispute amongst themselves. The complainant has stated that he does not wish to pursue complaint made by him against the applicant and the case may be quashed. 5. In view of the above, the C.R.No.529 of 2006 of Hadapsar Police Station, Pune and the proceedings relating thereto are quashed. The applicant to be released forthwith if not required in any other case. 6. Application is disposed of. [Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.]