c^\ yi» 'ys s}0aGft! IN THE HIG COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.'-f(5'5-QF 2006 PETITIONER ^^- ?s@^ ..-^;..- ^•"'^ ^y.. ^•- RESPONDENTS Shree Nakoda Ispat Limited A Limited Company incorporated Under Company's Act having its Office near Railway Crossing Mowa, Raipur (CG) through Its Manager (P&A) Shri Rajendra Tiwari, S/o Shri B N Tiwari, Aged about 31 years, Authorized Signatory of Shree Nakoda Ispat Ltd., Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Energy, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Chief Electrical Inspector Government of Chhattisgarh, 36/347, Istfloor, Bairen Bazar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) , 3. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Sundar Nagar, P. O. Dangania, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), through its Secretary. ^ RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 2261. OF THE -} CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION AND ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE DIRECTIONS / ORDERS HIGH COURT OF JuDiCA-TURB CHHATTISGARHs CORAAl : HON'BLE SHRI H.L. DATTU, C.J. AND HON'BLE SHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRA, J WRIT PBTTTION No. 7155 OF 2006 snree naKoaa ispat umited ytate ot cnnattisgani anct omers Present: Shri Manindra Shrivastava, Sr. Advocate with Shri Atroi l<nan, Actvocate, tor me peutioner. Sto-i Prashant Mistu'a, Adai. Advocate Cieneral lor respondents No. 1 and 2/State. Shri A.S. Gaharwar, standing counsel for responaent No. 'd. ORAL ORDER (12-2-2007) 'l'ne touowing oral orcler ot uie court was passecl bv i-l.L. UaTtU, G.d. 'i'ne petitioner in Uiis wnt petition luect under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks for the following reliets:- 1. 'l'o declare yection '2W ot uie cnnattisgarn Amendnient Act, 2004 inserting Section 3(l-a) in the crtnattisgarli Act, lyyi as uitra vu-es ana unconstitutional. —--—-- b3 3. 2. 'l'o issue a wnt ui t&e nature ot mandamus to uie responaents torbeanng uiem trom levying ana couecnng unerg\; Ueveiopment cess trom me petmoner under Hection 3(i-aj ot me cnnattisgarn. Upkar (Sansodhan) Adhiniyam, 2004. To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashiiig the bills dated 16-11-2005, 16-12-2005, 16-1-2006 to 16-9-2006. iMotice ot tjtiis petition was issued and it is servea on uie responclents. Leaniea counsel tor Uie parttes submit Detore us mat tlie issue raised m. tois wnt petiuon is no more deDatable m view ot' ttie law declared bv this Court in Writ Petition No. 2384/2006. Kespecttultv tQUowing tne observations made in the atoresaicl wnt petition, tms petition also requires to be ailowecl. AccorcluiglY, ttie touowuig order l. wnt petition is allowed in terms ot me orclers anct ctirections issued. bv ttus Court ui Wnt Petition No. 2384/2006 disposed ol' on 15-12-2006. Ordered accordingly. 2. In the facts and circumstances of the case, parties are dtrected to bear fheir own costs. Ordered accordingly. _-1———— Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge