PETITIONER : A,, @ CFVmyC A’ Smt. Padmawati Chauhan, Aged about 45 years, “3J0- Jagatram Chauhan, Tulsinagar, Rajnandgaon Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : R/o* Bakhtawarchaal, Distt. State of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary Forest Department D.K.S. Bhawan ‘ Raipur (CG) ‘ <b@?{ x " e 4":‘7 xxJ “p “; .nvg w Conservator of Forest , Circle Durg Distt. Durg (CG) Divisional Forest Officer, Divisional Rajnandgaon Rajrfandgaon Forest Office, (CG) / I 3EN§§£E @Etfemi @V THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w. P. No. Haw [2006 D WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226[ 227 OF THE can f 23 HEGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT B!LASPUR $INGLE gENCH : HWWELE MR. $ATISH K. AGNIHG‘TRL J. WRIT PETiTmN IS.) N0.4250 OF 2G§6 Egtitéone: : Smt. Padmawaii Chauhan Véi'3”3 Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others .. Pmseni : Mr. Anup Magumdar, counsel for i‘he petizioner. Mr. Sushi! Dubey, Government Advocate fer the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 20‘“ Day of February, 2007) The main grievance of the petitioner, who is working as Godown Chowkidar in Worid Food Godown, Forest Office, Rajnandgaon at Collector‘s rate” is that as per policy of the Government, the employees, who had been kiiled in naxaiite activities, their dependents snail be entitled for reguiar appointment and in pursuance of that, vide order dated 24-9-1 994! 12 appointments were made. The petitioner was appointed at Collector's rate, whereas other 11 persons were appointed on regular basis and as such, the petitioner was not given similar treatment as given to the other persons. The petitioner made severai representations in this regard, but respondent No.3 has not decided the same. 5‘\"\ 2. !n the circumstances, iearned counsei appearing for the petitioner submi$ that even though the petitioner has aiready made representations, but they are not being decided, therefore, the petitioner may be aliowed to make a detailed representation to respondent No.3 and in turn, respondent No.3 be directed to decide the representations of the petitioner in accordance with law, to which learned counsei appearing for the State/respondents has no objection. 3. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the'merits of the case, the petitioner is allowed to make a detailed representation raising all her grievances to respondent No.3 within a period of 15 days from today atong with a copy of this petition. in turn, the respondent No.3 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of the representation after considering all the grievances raised by the petitioner, in accordance with law. 4. With the direction aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to cost. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotr‘i Judge Gopal