IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1330 OF 200 PETITION NO. 1330 OF 200 PETITION NO. 1330 OF 2007 Ramesh Ramdas Ahirrao .... Petitioner versus Dr. Ambedkar Vidyarthi Vasti Gruh and Shikshan Mandal & Ors ...... Respondent. Shri R.S.Apte i/b N.R.Bubna for the petitioner CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. A.P. DESHPANDE, J. A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; DATED; DATED; 28TH EBRUARY, 2007 28TH EBRUARY, 2007 28TH EBRUARY, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The present petitioner claims to have worked with the respondent as an Assistant teacher from the year 1994 to 1998. The Tribunal after perusing the muster roll and the inspection reports from the department of education, has reached a conclusion that the petitioner has not worked for the period for which he claims to have worked. The Tribunal has held that the petitioner has hardly worked for seven months. The petitioner had merely placed reliance on a certificate issued by the Head Master to the effect that the petitioner had worked for three years. The Head Master when confronted with the same has tendered apology to the management. Hence apology later is, also placed on record of the Tribunal. Taking over all view of the matter, the finding recorded by the Tribunal was that the petitioner had not worked for the period for which he claims to have worked. The finding of fact is based on material on record. 2. Perused the impugned order. The same does not warrant any interference in the impugned order. In the result, the writ petition fails and it is summarily dismissed. .....