IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25507 of 2010 MOHAN MUSHAR, S/o Birbahadur Mushar. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 08.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 396 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. By order dated 22.03.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 8114 of 2010 the petitioner was refused bail stating therein that a looted mobile was found in possession of the petitioner from which he had called his family members which in humble submission of the counsel for the petitioner is that it was an error of record when the case diary was called for it was found that the looted mobile was not from the possession of the petitioner but from the brother of the petitioner and the rest of the statements incorporated in the said order was correct. Considering that there had been two deaths in the present occurrence which was committed for ends of dacoity and there is confessional statement of the co-accused as well as the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is once again rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it within a reasonable time. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)