2011wp3625.09.odt 1 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 3625 of 2009 (Ajaj S. Gujar .vs. State and Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Coram: D.D.Sinha and F. M. Reis, JJ. Date : 20/11/2009. Heard Mr. D.V.Chauhan, Adv. for petitioner, Mr.O.D.Kakde, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.1 and Mr.R.M.Mardikar, Adv. for respondent no.2. Counsel for petitioner has submitted that the services of petitioner were terminated by the Akola Municipal Corporation vide order dt. 19.4.2006. The petitioner had challenged the order of termination by filing Writ Petition No.2241 of 2006 which was allowed by the Division Bench of this Court vide order dt. 19.11.2008. Operative part of the order reads thus : “(i) The order impugned in both the petitions issued by the Municipal Corporation, terminating services of the petitioners and directions issued by Principal Secretary, State 2011wp3625.09.odt 2 . of Maharashtra cancelling appointments of the petitioners are set aside. However, the Principal Secretary, State of Maharashtra shall be free to take action, if so advised, pursuant to the directions issued by this Court dated 01.03.2006 in the aforesaid Writ Petition. (ii) Rule is made absolute accordingly. (iii) Civil Applications, if any, stand merged in this order. Counsel for petitioner states that, in spite of the above referred order, the respondent-Corporation has not reinstated the petitioner in service. Counsel for Corporation/respondent no.2 submits that the Corporation is ready and willing to reinstate the petitioner in service in view of the above referred decision of this Court. In that view of the matter, present petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE jais