•Mtu"^y^-a""- S^') w^ ^s: ^' SrtiiSSltfi1 T^ •^i^iw, ®flly'i6,'f^ray 'an^F <oi<*> (•i°tf'}«i<i<?) (Sinole Bench; Hon'b W.P. NoJ (Petition U/A 226 & 227 4f the Constitution of India) Petitioner Respondents Vs 1. 2. 3. Deput^ bistt. 05.02.2009 Wiferfh wreft ^fft^ <i"i«;i< ^? sif'CT 3ni% e Mr. Justfce Dhirendra Mishra) 3408/2003 Anil K|umar Parate, S/o Shri Har Chandra Paratet aged 33 years, R/o Dalli Rajhara, Distt. purg (C6) State | ©ovt. of Chhattisgarh, Through Secre1|ary, Forest & Agriculture Department, &K Bh^wan, Raipur (CG) Collector, Distt. Durg (C6) Level Caste Certificate Enquiry Commiftee, Durg, Asst-t. Commisioner, <& Memb^r", Durg (C(5) Mr. TK Tiwari, learned coijnsel for the petitioners. learned Dy <5A for the Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, respondents/State. The petitioner has filed tljiis petition for quashing the order of Annexure P/4 passed by r ent No.3, where.by bistrict Level Caste Certificate Verifica-|ion Committee, Durg has declared the caste certificate of Anne^ure P/2 issued to the petitioner illegal. Learned counsel -for thje petitioner submits that the bistrict Level Caste Certificatfc Verification Committee has no TW-S Ss-iFiyPtWfWtySR—FS/95—11 /2C08—1,00,000. -t" ..-<s ^'' •"•-?&. .^'•v il ^:/ asEi 3??^?T ^T ^sli<4* 3?l^l sa*ii^» ~5^1 '^WSW'il, 8>tft'M*IS, 'faRTOgT '^INCTI %»*i<<<» sn^i ''ffisp (^pfgs^f) t^TOT ^fts SiI^I power under the law to verify the same illegal, and therefor^, the order impugned is without jurisdiction and deserves to be (juashed. Chhattisgarh as per directions verification of the caste certifi •wiicritttnircif4 •fe^t•rfsR^R ^;3iRiH3(I^T the caste certificate and dec!are On the other han4, learned counsel for the respondents/State submits fhat the caste certificate of Annexure P/2 issued to the petjl-ioner by the District Coordinator, Ad'im Jati, Harijan Kalyan, Raipjur may be foruvarded to the High Level Caste Scrutiny Commit-tjee constituted by the State of |of the Hon'ble Supreme Court for fcate. Mr. Tiwari, learned cc^unsel for the petitioner has no objection if the caste certific4te of the petitioner is forwarded s to the High Level Caste Scrutin^ Committee for verification after affording him due opportunity ^f hearing in accordance with law. However, he prays that till his daste certificate is verified by the above committee, no coercive ^teps should be taken against the j petitioner on the basis of impugjied order of Annexure P/4. In view of above submi; sions of learned counsel for the parties, the i'mpugned order of| Annexure P/4 is quashed. Caste certificate of Annexure P/2 of jthe petitioner is forwarded to the High Level Caste Scrutiny Corjimittee for fresh verificcition in ^^R^^i ^surf^ii <i"t^ff5ii i^—!''S/95—11/2008—1,00,000. ^3..-,.,.^'.^,','':'?. ;:: 'T=f"^l<<!^<1, 8>flly<l<a, ^dl.y^ 3n^fi'lra^T ('jql^y') » SI^I'Wl^'lNT i&' wfisn^iante- KdIW^lfW 311^1 qipfeqN HHvS 4 feSt <ial«rl< iTsffimsn^i accordance with law after affoijding opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petition is, according y, disposed of. Sd/- DHIRENDRA MISHRA Judge ^ ?i;^^l^ ^^•^'"I'l^.i.i; <i^..Tf^TR'—FS/95—ii 1/2008—1,00,000. +1