FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 517 OF 2000 W I T H CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1235 OF 2003 [Mahadev Tatu Sawant (since decd) thru.heirs & Ors. V/S. Krishna Tatu Sawant & Ors.] _____________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court s orders : ’ or directions and Registrar s’ : Court s or Judge s orders ’ ’ orders : _____________________________________________________________________________________ Mr.Vishalkumar S. Kothari i/by. M/s.Khandeparkar & Associates, adv.for appellants. Respondents and advocate absent. CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED : 24TH NOVEMBER 2009. PC :­ 1. The Appeal is placed on the board with an office note that when the Civil Application for restoration of the Appeal was allowed, the appellants were directed to take steps for service upon the unserved respondents. However, no steps have been taken till date. 2. Mr. Kothari, the learned counsel for the appellants states that he has been time and again sending messages to the appellants to contact him and give him instructions in the matter, so that the direction of the court can be complied with. Lastly, he had sent telegram dated 19th November, 2009 requesting them to contact him. The said telegram is taken on record and marked Exhibit­A. Despite the telegram, the appellants are absent. In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed. 3. With the dismissal of the Appeal, Civil Application No. 1235 of 2003 does not survive. The same is accordingly disposed off. (JUDGE)