IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2083 of 2009 1. Hridayal Kumar, son of Sri Ram Naresh Sharma, R/O Postal Park Chowk, Police Station- Kankarbagh, District Patna 2. Randhir Kumar, son of Late Mundrika Singh, R/O Village Kankarbagh, P.O. Bari Chharhari, Police Station Tharthari, District Nalanda 3. Shri Bhagwan Pandey son of Sri Kashi Nath Pandey, Resident of village Gopalpur, Police Station Dinara, District Rohtas Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Mr. R.J.M. Pilla, Old Secretariat, Patna 2. Secretary, Planning & Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. Sri Rameshwar Singh 3. Director, Planning & Evaluation, Bihar, Patna. Vacant 4. Secretary, Agriculture, Bihar, Patna. K.C. Saha 5. Director, Agriculture, Bihar, Patna. Dr. B. Rajendra 6. Director, Fisheries Department, Bihar, Patna. R.N. Chaudhary 7. Secretary, Department of Science & Technology, Bihar, Patna. Ranikant 8. Director-in-Chief, Health Department, Bihar, Patna. Dr. Shatrughna Pd. Singh 9. Secretary, Health Department, Bihar, Patna. Bhau Pratap Sharma 10. Mr. Ashok Kr. Choudhary, Chairman, B.P.S.C., Patna 11. Mr. Govind Narayan Akhauri, Secretary, B.P.S.C., Patna 12. Public Service Commission, Sharat Chandra Jha, Dy. Secretary, B.P.S.C. 13. Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Department of Co-operative, Bihar, Patna. K.C. Saha 14. Secretary, Land & Revenue Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. Ashok Saretham. 07/ 03.12.2010 In compliance of my earlier order passed in the contempt petition, counsel for the Bihar Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as “the Commission”) has produced letter No. 2210 dated 30.11.2010 of the Secretary of the Commission stating that in order to respond - 2 - to the requisition made by the Planning and Development Department for appointment against 187 posts, the Commission held its meeting on 3.11.2010 and final decision about the number of officers to be recommended for appointment is to be taken within three weeks. In the light of the contents of the aforesaid letter dated 30.11.2010, the contempt petition is disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioners to approach this Court again if the recommendations are not made by the Commission in response to the requisition received from the Government Department. A photo copy of the letter dated 30.11.2010 is taken on record. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)