IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 12TH APRIL 2007 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1929 WP(C).No. 10926 of 2007(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ RAJI MOL, D/O VICTORIA, MALAVILA VEEDU, PANNIYODE, VEERANAKAVU VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI.A.S.SABU RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTAKKADA POLICE STATION, KATTAKKADA, TRIVANDRUM. 3. RAJAYYAN, S/O THANKAYYAN, VEERANKAVU VILLAGE, OOMAKUZHY, KALAMMAM. 4. SUNDARAN, S/O THANKAYYAN, SANTHOSH BHAVAN, VEERANKAVU VILLAGE, OOMAKUZHY, KALLAMAM. 5. SANTHOSH KUMAR, S/O THANKAYYAN, SANTHOSH BHAVANANM, VEERANKAVU VILLAGE, OOMAKUZHY, KALLAMAM. 6. USHA, D/O KAMALAN, VEERANKAVU VILLAGE, OOMAKUZHY, KALLAMAM. W.P.(C).10926/2007 7. BABU, S/O KAMALAN, VEERANKAVU VILLAGE, OOMAKUZHY, KALLAMAM. 8. AMBILI, D/O KAMALAN, VEERANKAVU VILLAGE, OOMAKUZHY, KALLAMAM. 9. LEELA, D/O KUNJI, VEERANKAVU VILLAGE, OOMAKUZHY, KALLAMAM. 10. OMANA, D/O ROSAMMA, VEERANKAVU VILLAGE, OOMAKUZHY, KALLAMAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.A.SALIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).10926/2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, NEDUMANGAD IN O.S.NO.648/2004 DATED 8.2.2006. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT NO.396/2006 OF KATTAKKADA POLICE STATION DATED 9.10.2006. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED NIL. /TRUE COPY/ J.B.KOSHY & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.10926 OF 2007 (A) ----------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of April, 2007 J U D G M E N T KOSHY,J. This is a petition for police protection. It is submitted that there a direction from the civil court to maintain status quo. In a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, we cannot decide the dispute between the parties and what is status quo etc. are to be decided by the civil court and not by this Court. We dispose of this writ petition with the direction to the police to see that law and order is maintained and lives of both parties are not endangered without expressing any opinion regarding the merits of the civil disputes. J.B.KOSHY, JUDGE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE prp J.B.KOSHY & K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JJ. -------------------------------------------------------- O.P.NO. OF 2006 () --------------------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T --------------------------------------------------------- 1th January, 2007