IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-19039 of 2010 (O & M) Date of decision: 09.09.2010 Lokesh .. Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .. Respondents Present:- Mr.Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.S.S. Mor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent-State. * * * * AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. The present petition is for grant of regular bail. As per the allegations against the petitioner, the name of the petitioner does not find mention in the FIR. One Sh. Satpal is the person, who has been named and in whose house, the theft was committed from where the deceased-Sonu was caught red-handed while stealing the television-set. The allegation against the petitioner is on the basis of a disclosure statement and it has further been alleged that the Mobile Phone of the petitioner was used to inform the relatives of deceased-Sonu about he having been caught in the theft. There are 21 prosecution witnesses in all, out of which, only five witnesses have been examined till date. The petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2010. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on bail to the satisfaction of CJM, Panipat. September 09, 2010 (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) sukhpreet JUDGE