IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-2833 of 2010 Date of Decision:5.4.2010 Kamal Kumar .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Pardeep Virk, D.A.G. Haryana. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Vide order dated 1.2.2010, liberty was given to the petitioner that in case he puts in appearance before the trial Court, he shall be released on interim bail on his furnishing bail bonds for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to its satisfaction. On 8.3.2010, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed for extension of time to enable the petitioner to appear before the trial Court. Time was extended to enable him to appear before the trial Court. Today, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner in spite of the case having been called out twice. Obviously, the petitioner has not appeared before the trial Court. As such, order dated 1.2.2010 has not been complied with. The concession of interim bail cannot be extended any further. Dismissed. 5.4.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE