IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.3731 of 2010 JAI PRAKASH SAH, S/O LATE DHANIK LAL SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 11.02.2010 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that during investigation the witnesses stated that the deceased died on account of illness and subsequently even the informant filed a petition stating therein that he had filed the present case on a misconception, let the petitioner, above named, who is in custody since 21.10.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Benipatti (Arer) P.S. Case No. 172 of 2008 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, on the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail and (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and 2 if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. 4. The Magistrate will immediately commit the case for trial and the trial Court in seisin will conclude the trial within a reasonable time in view of the fact that the informant himself is not supporting the case of the prosecution now. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)