1 CWP-1531.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINA CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1531 OF 2010 Philip Lawrence Furtado .... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents Shri Shailesh Kumar for the Petitioner. Ms S.D. Shinde, APP, for the State. Shri Pravin Patel for Respondent No.2. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JANUARY 27, 2011 P.C: This is a petition for quashing the process issued by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 53rd Court, Mulund, Mumbai bearing Criminal Case No.60/SS/2008 for the offence punishable under Section 506(II) of the IPC. The allegations are that the petitioner gave filthy abuses and threats on telephone on 8-1-2008 at 11:15 a.m. to the complainant. The complainant has stated so in his complaint and also presumably so in his verification. On that, process was ordered to be issued. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that without any details of the 2 CWP-1531.10 calls from the MTNL, that is the service provider, the learned Magistrate should not have accepted the word of the complainant for its face value and issued process. He further submits that the petitioner has in fact nothing to do with the dispute in the family since he was all along serving in the BARC. That has no bearing on the complaint. The question of substantiating those threats at this stage does not arise since the recitals in the complaint show that all the ingredients of the offence for which the process has been issued have been alleged by the complainant. In view of this, the learned Sessions Judge cannot be said to have erred in rejecting the petitioner's revision. The writ petition is dismissed. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)