IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M. A. f C) N0. ^ }S -DF 2006 ^jj APPELLANT CLAIMANT HemrajVerma Son of Shri Purushottam Verma, aged about 42years, Resident of Shrinagar (Shivanandnagar), Khamtarai, Raipur, Tahsil and District District Raipur (C.G.). ^.^^ \f£^^ RESPONDENTS XON-CLAIMANTS ^?.r ^9 «<^.-- ^^ Agradas Son of Shri Gohar Singh Goyal, aged about 22 years, Resident of Village Antariya, Police Station Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.). Inderjeet Singh Son of Shri Jasbir Singh, aged about 24 years, Resident of M.I.G.-C-161, Bhilai, Police Supela, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.). The New India Insurance Company, Through: The Divisional Manager, Division Office No.-l, Jail Road, Raipur, Tahsi! and District Raipur (C.G.). MEMO OF APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 f2) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 ^ XI-HC-78 3TT^T^T^i<=b cTSTT 3^?T 5FTW Priya ^ ^° ^^ ft^ *<l*l^l shHt«h 3^r •^Ni<n^, ^tn-M^Ko, [c«ni^< ;^:^:^^ 3TI^T ys«sh ('ic<^a'^6T) B^cTTW: ^f?cT 3TI^T 15.11.2006 Shri P.K. Tubiyan, coims The only point raised by cbi^[(n41'< WT^rf ^ te^t <f^<-d.i< ^3Tf^T3:TT^T ?1 for fhe appellmit. ihe leamed eoimsel for tfae q>pellant in fhis appeal is for enhancement of co^npensation ofRs. 30,000/- awarded by tihe leamed M.A.C.T. towards dam^ges sustained by <he Mwutii-SW vehicle bearing No. CG 07/C/3534 is fh4t tfae compensation awarded by the teamed M.A.C.T towards damages is ti|ieager and caimot be said to be just and reasonable compensation. However, leamed coims€|lfor the appellant admitted that he did not file and prove tfae actual biUs ^fbich were paid by the claimant/appeUant towards repairs undertaken in fh^ aforesaid car. He also admitt^d fhat the person who actually undertook tfaj^ work ofrq>airs offhe vehicle was also not opinion (hat in absence ofany do<| caused to the vehicle in question| exammed. The contention of Ifa^ leamed coitasel for the appellant is based only on an estimate for Rs. 90,0(|0/- which had been filed before the leamed M.A.C.T. which was not considexfed. Having considered the ajbove submission, I am of tfae comidered wnerrts to prow the extent of actual repairs and payment made tfaerefor, compensation ofRs. 30,000/- awarded by Ae le^med M.A.C.T. camiot be faulted with. fii fhe result, this appeal (being devoid of merit is dismissed, at the stage ofadmission. C.C, as per ndes. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge P.T.O.