IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14709 of 2010 1. SUNITA KUMARI SHRIVASTAVA W/O SHRI DHANANJAY KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA R/O VILL. & POST- ROOP PUR, P.S.- BHABUA, DISTT.- KAIMUR, AT BHABUA, AT PRESENT POSTED AS BLOCK TEACHER, GOVT. MIDDLE SCHOOL, ROOP PUR, BHABUA-2, DISTT.- KAIMUR AT BHABUA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 3. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY AND ADULT EDUCATION GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KAIMUR AT BHABUA 5. THE MEMBER DISTRICT TEACHERS EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KAIMUR, DISTT.- KAIMUR AT BHABUA 6. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, KAIMUR AT BHABUA 7. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION- CUM-SUB-DIVISIONAL EDUCATION OFFICER, KAIMUR AT BHABUA 8. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, BHABHUA-2, DISTT.- KAIMUR AT BHABUA 9. THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, BHABHUA, DISTT.- KAIMUR AT BHABUA ----------- 2 22/04/2011 The decision dated 13.07.2010 rendered by the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Kaimur at Bhabhua is based on a basic finding that the - 2 - so called degree obtained by the petitioner from Bhartiya Shiksha Parishad, Lucknow is not from a recognized Institution either by the National Council of Teachers Education or even by the Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar. This issue was raised by several petitioners before this Court and a detailed judgment contained in annexure-9 came to be rendered by this Court based on which the State government carried on an enquiry and came to a considered opinion that the degree obtained by the petitioner cannot be given recognition in view of the finding which the State government arrived at which is contained in annexure-10 which certifies that the Institution in question is neither recognized by the State of U.P. nor by the National Council of Teachers Education. If the petitioner has entered into service on the basis of such a degree, where is the question of issuing a direction for payment of salary to the petitioner on the basis of such a degree which ought not to have given a break by way of appointment in the very first case. There is no illegality in the said decision of the Appellate Authority. - 3 - This writ application has no merit. It is dismissed accordingly. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)