IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2010 / 19TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 17886 of 2010(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- V.K.MADHAVADAS, S/O.M.KUTTAN, AGED 28 YEARS, L.D.TYPIST, DISTRICT PLANNING OFFICE, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.B.SAJEEV KUMAR SRI.M.K.THANKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE PLANNING BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE STATE PLANNING BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, KERALA STATE PLANNING BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 17886 OF 2010 (I) ===================== Dated this the 9th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a LD Typist. He is presently working at District Planning Office, Palakkad since 27/3/2010. It is stated that at the instance of one Smt.K.C.Sailamma, who had filed a writ petition before this Court and obtained an order for consideration of her representation, the order posting the petitioner at Palakkad is likely to be cancelled. It is with this apprehension, the writ petition is filed. 2. From the above stated facts itself, it is obvious that, as at present, no order prejudicial to the petitioner has been passed by any of the authorities, and it is only his apprehension that led him to file the writ petition. Therefore, the writ petition is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge any prejudicial order that is to be passed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp