IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 742 of 2008 Bansi Lal Selani & Others. ........ Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others. ......... Respondents Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation of the case have submitted a final report before the Circle Officer concerned on 20.10.2008 which is likely to be submitted before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the short counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 18.09.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the final report before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 03.12.2008 V.K