IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 26TH OCTOBER 2010 / 4TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 630 of 2007(Y) -------------------------------------- O.S.NO.269/2006 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, PARAVOOR ...... PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- BEENA, WIFE OF PRADEEP KUMAR, CHAMAPUZHA VEEDU, POZHIKKARA, PARAVOOR P.O.,KOLLAM BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (LAW AND ORDER), KOLLAM. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLICE STATION, PARAVOOR, KOLLAM. 4. SREEKUMARI AMMA, D/O.KAMALAKSHI AMMA, RESIDING AT ANCHUKALLUMOODU VEEDU, KOTTAPPURAM VILLAGE, PARAVOOR, KOLLAM. 5. HAREESH, S/O.KAMALAKSHI AMMA, RESIDING AT ANCHUKALLUMOODU VEEDU, KOTTAPPURAM VILLAGE, PARAVOOR, KOLLAM. 6. ANI, S/O. KAMALAKSHI AMMA, RESIDING AT ANCHUKALLUMOODU VEEDU, KOTTAPPURAM VILLAGE, PARAVOOR, KOLLAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.630/2007 Y APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PARAVOOR AS CMP.NO. 8472 OF 2006. P2: COPY OF THE PLAINT FILED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PARAVOOR IN O.S.NO.269 OF 2006. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No.630 of 2007 -------------------------- Dated this the 26th October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Crime No.410/2006 of Paravoor Police Station was registered based on Ext.P1 complaint filed by the petitioner before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Paravoor and sent for investigation under Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for a direction to complete the investigation and submit the final report. 2. Third respondent was directed to file a statement. The statement filed by the third respondent on 14.2.2007 shows that investigation was in progress and subsequent to the registration of this case Crime 446/2007 was also registered and both the cases are being investigated. It also shows that fourth respondent, the first accused in the crime filed O.S 269/2006, a suit for injunction against the husband of the petitioner and an order of temporary injunction was passed. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that proper W.P (C) No.630 of 2007 2 investigation is not being done. The delay in filing the final report was attributed to the failure of the investigating officer to question the husband of the petitioner. By order dated 02.2.2007, it was made clear that the husband of the petitioner is with the petitioner and investigating officer could question him. In such circumstances, I do not find any necessity to retain the writ petition.. The writ petition is disposed directing third respondent, Sub Inspector of Police to file the final report , if not filed so far, without further delay. M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE ma