'f^^S^' • ^=SS:—ig?l-^~S^tea,_I~-»!S ^(;(ta,?" Silltilf BENfceli -^'•^1 $ '3 ?y'1s S-=;£3: i^ '&ss £^ ^.'•' ;; ;:* IN^HE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS fy ^..•'. ,^K ^•w^ ^^ ^' W.P. (227) NO.S\\^ OF 2010 Manmati W/o Basdev Parhiya, aged about 45 years, R/o village Dolangi, Tahsil Raraanujganj, District Surguja C.G. (Non-Applicant no.l) VERSUS 1. Karmaniya W/o Shambhu Singh, aged about 32 years, R/o village Dolangi, Tahsil Ramanujganj, District Surguja C.G. ( Applicant) 2. Shamir Kumar Haldar, Head Master, Primary School Dhangaon, Janpad Panchayat Balrampur, District Surguja C.G. 3. Jawaharram , Shiksha Karmi Grade III, Middle School Kanda, Janpad, Panchayat Balrampur, District Surguja C.G. 4'. Shiril Ekka, Shiksha Karmi Grade III, Primary School Khadiyadamar, Janpad Panchayat Balrampur, District Surguja C.G. 5. Roshandeep Kachhap, Shiksha Karmi Grade III, Primary School Patelpara .iTFRR.-.i i=s3'iT;-K>'is^^^ .iK^I:w.fe>^ Sundarpur, Janpad Panchayat Ramchndrapur, District Surguja C.G. (The respondent no. 2 to 5 are non- applicant no. 2 to 5 before the learned Specified Officer) 6. Sub Divisional Officer cum Specified Officer under Section 122 of the Panchayat Raj Adhiniyara, Ramanujganj, District Surguja C.G. WRIT_PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OILINDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. -*a-«-MLT>TTTr< nlUBACI? auajSTQITD t '^TinfiHJP t HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR WRiT PETITtON (2271 No. 2485 of2010 PETmONER Manmati A ^.; •-. ^" RESPONDENTS VERSUS l^rmaniya & Others Gowri IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION GF !NDIA t SB: Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra. J. Present: Shri Dashrath Prajapatl, Advocsrte for the priltioner. Shri V.K. Pandey, Advocate forthe respondent N0.1 caveator. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. 2. 3. 4. (Passed on 1^h day of May, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on InstNctjons, seeks permisslon of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the flnal order passed by the prescribed authority in the electlon petition. Learned counsel appearing for the other side has no objection. It is ordered, accordingly. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismi^ed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Consequently, I.A.Nos.1, 2 and 3 stand disposed of. Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge