1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01/07/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN Writ Petition (MD) No.2903 of 2011 and MP(MD)No.1 of 2011 M.Kannan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Registrar, Madurai Kamaraj University Madurai. 2.The Director Directorate of Distance Education, Madurai Kamaraj University Madurai. 3.The Controller of Examinations, Directorate of Distance Education, Madurai Kamaraj University Madurai. 4.The Additional Controller of Examinations Directorate of Distance Education, Madurai Kamaraj University Madurai. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the documents pertaining to the impugned order passed by the fourth respondent vide Memorandum No.UG/NS/Malpractice dated 10.08.2010 and may quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to publish the result of this petitioner and to issue the relevant mark statement within a specified time frame. For petitioner ...Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar For Respondents ...Mr.R.Janakiramulu O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition challenging the impugned order of the fourth https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 respondent dated 10.08.2010 cancelling the examination of all the subjects registered for that session and debarring him for subsequent four examinations. The order is extracted hereunder: “The Syndicate of the Madurai Kamaraj University considered the recommendations of the Discipline committee and resolved as follows: “CANCEL THE EXAMINATIONS OF ALL THE SUBJECTS REGISTERED FOR THAT SESSION AND DEBAR FOR SUBSEQUENT FOUR EXAMINATIONS. MOREOVER, RELEVANT ACTION SHOULD BE INITIATED IF AN OUTSIDER IS INVOLVED.” 4. On notice, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent University produced a letter dated 27.04.2011 stating that the punishment imposed on the petitioner has been cancelled. The operative portion of the instruction is extracted hereunder: khzth; “ M.fz;zd ; B.A. Mq;fpyk; gjpT vz; A8A4080663 fle;j April 2009y; ,th; 1R3, 1R4 vd;w ghlj;jpid Njh;T vOjpAs;shh;. 19.05.2009 md;W 1R3 rhpahd ghlf;Fwpa Pl ; bid Fwpapl;L vOjpAs;shh;. Mdhy;> 20.05.2009 y; 1R4 vd;w Njh;T eilngw;wJ. mj;Njh;tpy ; khzth; M.fz;zd ; 1R4 vd;W vOJtjw;F gjpyhf 1R3 vd;w ghlf; Fwpa Pl ; bid jtWjyhf Fwpapl;L Njh;T vOjp tpl;lhh;. Mjid ika kjpg;g PL nra;Ak; NghJ (1R3) tpilj;jhis kjpg;g PL nra;Ak; Mrphpah;fshy; jpUj;jg ;gl ;L me;j ghlj;jpw;F 44 kjpg;ngz ;fs ; toq;fg ;gl ;Ls ;sJ. Gpd;G kjpg;ngz;iz EDP Kyk; fzpdpy; gjpT nra;Ak; NghJ fzpdp gphpT mYtyh;fs ; xNu Njh;T vz;zpy; 1R3 vd;w ghlj;jpw ;F ,uz;L Kiw kjpg;ngz ; toq;fg ;gl ;ljhy ; newpfl;l nray;fspy; <Lgl;ljhf vLj;Jf ;nfhz;L xOq;FKiw FOtpy; itf;fg ;gl ;lJ. mk;khztDf;F f Po ;f ;fz ;l jz;lidAk; toq;fg ;gl ;Ltpl;lJ mtuJ jz;lid scale 7 mjhtJ newpfl;l nray;fspy; – gjpT nra;ag ;gl ;l Njh;T vOjpa Mz;Lk ; mjd; gpd;G tuf;$ba ehd;F Njh;T Mz;Lfspy; Njh;T vOj $lhJ vd;W xOq;FKiw FO cj;juT gpwg;gpj ;jJ. gpd;dh ; khzth; cah;e Pjpkd ;wj ;jpy; tof;F njhLj;Js;shh;. mjd ;tof ;F vz; WP (MD) No.2903 of 2011. gpd;G khztdpd; tpilj;jhis vLj;J Muha;e ;j NghJ khzth; newpfl;l nraypy; <Lgltpy;iy vd;W njhpatUfpwJ. khzth; ;jtWjyhf 1R4 vd;w tpilj;jhspy; 1R3 vd;W Fwpapl;L vOjpapUe;jjhy ; khztDf;F jtWjyhf jz;lid toq;fg ;gl ;Ltpl ;lJ. MfNt khztdpd; vjph;fhy eyd; fUjp khztDf;F mspf;fg ;gl ;l jz;lid uj;J nra;J mth;f ;F Njh;T Kbtpid toq;fp Miz toq;f Ntz;lg ;gLfpwJ. Nkw;fz ;l tptuq;fis fUj;jpy ; nfhz;L khzth; M.fz;zd ; B.A. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3 Mq;fpyk; gjpT vz; A8A4080663 fle;j April 2009 y; – 1R3, 1R4 Njh;Tj;jhspy ; 1R3 vd;W jtWjyhf vOjpajpd; Kyk; khztDf;F xOq;FKiw FOtpy; newpfl;l nray;fspy ; <Lgl;ljhf fUjp mk;khztDf;F toq;fg ;gl ;l jz;lidia vjph;fhy eyd; fUjp uj;j nra;a Ntz;lg ;gLfpwJ. M m uj ;Jbra;ag ;gl ;L tp;llhy; “ ” April 2009y; jtWjyhf vOjpa 1R3 vd;w ghlj;jpd; kjpg;ngz;id 1R4 vd;w ghlj;jpw;F khw;wk; nra;J Njh;T Kbtpid ntspapl Miz Ntz;lg ;gLfpwJ. 5. At this juncture, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that mark statement pertaining to the second year has been sent and with regard to the third year, the same has not been sent. However, it is stated by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent University that the mark statement will be sent to the petitioner in due course. 6. In view of the above stated position, the writ petition stands closed as it has become infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Registrar, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai. 2.The Director Directorate of Distance Education, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai. 3.The Controller of Examinations, Directorate of Distance Education, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai. 4.The Additional Controller of Examinations Directorate of Distance Education, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai +One CC to M.K.P.Narayanakumar, Advocate, SR.No.21143 +One Cc to Mr.R.Janakiramulu, Advocate, SR.No.21205 RR rl/7c – 20.7.2011 W.P.(MD) No.2903 of 2011 01.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/