IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR APPEAL AGIANST ORDER NO. 134/2009 (Mrs. Neeta Rajesh Lambe and others vrs. Smt. Shailaja Digamber Lambe and others) ................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... ... CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 22nd DECEMBER, 2010. Shri Mohta, the learned counsel holding for Advocate Shri R.L.Khapre, appearing for the appellants. Shri Naik, the learned counsel appears for Respondent no.6. Shri D.A.Mahajan, the learned counsel appears for Respondent no.5 and Shri A.T.Purohit, the learned counsel appears for Respondent no.7. The learned counsel for the parties have placed on record Pursis dated 22.12.2010, marked as “X” for identification, stating that the respondent no.6 has agreed not to transfer or alienate the suit property till the settlement of the suit and status quo will be maintained till such settlement. The learned counsel submits that the matter can be disposed of in terms of this pursis. Hence, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the pursis. On 15th November, 2010, this court had passed an order directing the parties to deposit cost of Rs.5,000/- each if the matter is not settled on or before the next date. In view of the fact that the settlement has been arrived at and the pursis has been filed, the payment of costs is dispensed with. JUDGE Rvjalit