BSFOHS THE HO tBLS UIQQ OOURT OF CHHATTISQAM AT s BIL^SPaSv ^O^S /y.p.^o.. _/03< PETITIONSa ^ v.<%4^ |,<5S-^.'>A''^>; w^ M/s» fframin Kalyan Audyogie Prashikshan /Kendra, K&lyan ffagar, ^heri, Qurg (0»Q») run by the Chhattisgarh Kalyan Samiti, Bhilai ff&gar, Durg (O.d.) Through: Badhelal Sahu^ Secretary, Chhattisgarh Kalyan Samiti. i.V/'..-'.J>' ^' t^'x.,.^ ^ rsssffs MSPONDSSTS s [^ ^v^ l^ ?» Union of IndiCL^ Throughs Seoretary^ ffovt. of India Ministry of Labour, Shastri Bhavan, ffSV1 DBMI^ 2. Bmployees Provident Fund Organisa- -tion, Throughs Segional Provident Fund Commissioner^ Sav Sharat Press Qomplsx, Sajbandha Maidan, Qaipur (Q.Q.) J. Shri A.S.Sa.snih Segional Prouidcnt Fund Oonimissioner^ iVavbharat Press Compl@3Bf Sajbandha Maidan, Saipur (C.S.) 4^ Shri <7aoo6 Thomas^ Snforcenent Off^Qer, ffav Sharat Press Complex, Sajbandha Maidan, Saipur (Q,0.) VBIT PSTITION OSDSS ASTIQLS /26/2^f OF TffS OONSTITUTION OF INQIA POR ISSUASOS OF VltIT OF MANDAMUS^ CSSTI08ABI OS ANY OTHER APPaOPSIATS 9'aiT, ORDES oa DiaEOTioy_£Ta^ /€2> XI-HG-—78 7^r '^TRf^R, ^ti1<rl4s<o, ^^!1< ^ Z-o^l^ WH^TT^iW^ "W^ 200 3W('?TTraiR' (^I^^T) ^TT^T'^T ^Jch ^^ 3Ti^¥l9h^\^ ^•...'' IF^TWHf^W^l 21-10-2004 Shri B.P. Mishra, Couns^l Shi'i S.K. Beriwal, Senior| India/re^pondent No. 1, Shri Pradccp Saxcua^ 2 to 4, Application for urgent Learned coimsel for tliel niatter siniilai' to that of W.P Prit/wk^ Lifnit^d t/s^ Uftidfz 'c?j for the petitioner. Panel Lawver for the Union of (pounsel for rcspondcnts No. hebrin^ s^rlng 1s allowed. petltloner submlts that tlie .[P.No. 1272/2004 [M/s f\Indim & Qth^s-s] dccidcd by tms Court vide order dat0d 3506/2003 (ZSP Compemjtf Ap^ellate Another) declded tiy llils COLI^- He nirther siibmits that not.ic^ petitioner by the respondent a^ Leamed counsel for the to tlle aii appeal before the The prayer is not oppos^d respondents. The prayer i©allowed. Le1 Appellate Trlbunal within 15 Havuig considered the fa^i case and material on record, <=hl^id^1T1 HS^IW ^ fe^t if^l'<^l< ^)'^tRW371^T 22-5-2004 aild W.F.NO. ilknit^d ys» Uni^n ^flndi^ & 1-i vlde order daled 6-2-2004. has also been issiied to the Lithorities. ^etltloner also prays for tlme Tribmial. by learned counsel for the the appeal be filecl before the d^vs. l^tsaiid circunistaiices ofthe [;he respondents ai'e directed 1 XI-HG—78 ^m^tT<i»w^ "3^'^TPTT^R, ^9tl1^4i<o, f®l<n^^< M......l€)kl.l^>..•^F[ 200 3^?TTT5W ( ^f^<s|<^T) ^T^¥I^Y'f^TbR' ^^1 3TT^¥? $F?yW Gowri ne ^ IT^HWH^ ^Wf T^ not to adopt t.he coerdve metho|r}s aiiiount 8-.S per Annexure - application is taken up Tor he4 the Appellate 'Ti'ibunal, subje^ securi.tv within fom- weeks. With the atbresaid obset disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P.P^ disposed of. Certtfied copy as per rule^ Ff 'HFi^ff ^f l^^)" <f^1<-$l< iT3?RFT3^T bls for recovery oft.he penalty P/16 tlll the urgent sta-y ring aiid order is passed by ;t to petitioner's fuiTdshing rvation the petition staiids o.1870/2003 also stand Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge y ^ '^