THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1548 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs, filed this Revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the correctness of the order, dated 22.02.2000, passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Palakonda, rejecting the application in I.A.No.363 of 2006 in O.S.No.92 of 2000, whereby they sought for appointment of an Advocate-Commissioner for the purpose of surveying the subject matter of the suit and to arrive at the exact area within the boundaries as mentioned therein. The Court below after considering the respective submissions did not find in favour of the petitioners mainly on the ground that the attempt is only to protract the proceedings and to fill up the lacunae. Further, it is also observed that such an application is not maintainable unless and until proper evidence is let in on behalf of the petitioners. Having heard learned counsel on either side and on a perusal of the material on record, it is to be seen that since the suit is one for specific performance, the entire gamut of controversy for grant of any relief, which is purely discretional, surrounds only the terms as contained in the agreement. Be that as it may, as long as no there is no proper foundation laid down by the petitioners, it is not proper to invoke any such an exercise. In that view of the matter, the Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merits and the same is accordingly, dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO 1st July 2010 dr