€^y%% w^ HI^H COURT OF CHHATTES^ARH AT M.A.Ca No.743 of 2009 ADDeHants Non-claimants Respondents Cjaimants 1. Devcharan S/o RamcharQn Rajak (Driyer of VehicJe), a9ed about 26 yrs 2. • Ramcharan S/o Babu.'al RQjaj (Owner of Vehic!e), aged about 60 yrs Both ft/o VsJloge Chokrowoy, Toh^il and Thana Simga, Distrjct Roipur (cw 1. 4. Versus Smt.HemJnbai W/o VIshnu Rajak D/o Sunder ajias •Kanhaiyo Nirmoikar, Qged about 34 years Madsn S/o Sunder atias KcinhatyQ NirrpaJkor, aged about 33 years KishGn S/o Sunder aHois Kanhcjya Nirmalkar, aged about 32 years Dhanesh S/o Sunder QJJQS KcnhGiyQ Nirmojkar, aged Qbout 30 years Sunder alias Kanhalya S/o Jhunsu Nir'rpalkw, aged about 58 years A!! R/o ViiSags Chhltapar, Post PendritQrai, Tahsi! csnd Thanct. Bemetora, DJstrict Dur9 (C<.(^) The New Indio Insuronce Compony Limited, RQipur, Tahsil and District RaJpLjr(C.<&.) (MISCELANECEQUS APPEAL UNDERSECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHiaE ACT, 1994) ^ Hon'bJeMr.T.P. ShoniQ, J.) Shri Arjun Singhroul, counse! for thg Gppe|?or»t.s. [-- g^--^ ^ ^.•'\ {^.^:/ ^.. B/- -z- ORAL (Passedw 11th Moy, Th.'s appea! 's directed against the aword dated 26.12.2008 pas-sed by the Additiona! Motor .Acc'derst Claimg 'Tribuno.!, Beme+ara, District Durg, in Cldm Case No.31/08. Learned counse! Qppeoring for the Gppelionts submits thot parMes have entered into compromise and the appetlants have paid the c!dm to respondents No.l to 5. He seeks to withdraw thjg appeaj with Sibert-y to fl!e appropriate o.ppiicatjon before the eidms tribuno-S for satigfoction of the award^ The appea! is dismlssed as withdrawn wlth the aforesaid liberty. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^