IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44819 of 2008 SAKILA BANO & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 26.11.2008 This application has been filed for modification of order dated 09.09.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38546 of 2008 whereby the earlier order passed by this court on 11.07.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 7806/08 was modified. I fail to understand that why the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Begusarai refused the bail bonds of the petitioners simply because the order dated 11.07.2008 reached to the court earlier. This kind of obstruction created by the court only shows that the Judicial Officer is not interested in dispensation of justice. An approach of a Judicial Officer should not be too technical, they should be more interested in dispensation of justice in lieu of creating an obstruction. The order dated 09.09.2008 is not modified but it is directed that Judicial Magistrate , Ist Class, Begusarai will accept the bail bond furnished by the petitioners in compliance of the order dated 09.09.08 without any further modification. It has also been informed by the petitioners’ counsel that on account of this technical objection raised by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, - 2 - Begusarai. Two petitioners, who were granted anticipatory bail, have already been arrested. This shows the attitude of the officer concerned. In future , the Judicial Officer should be more cautious. The time for surrender in case of petitioners, namely, Sakila Bano and Md. Muso @ Mustakim @ Muso is extended by three weeks from today. They will be released on bail in case of arrest or surrender within extended time with the same terms and conditions as mentioned in the order dated 11.07.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No 7806/08. Let the order be faxed to the court concerned at the cost of the petitioners. AKV/ (Mridula Mishra,J.)