IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9568 of 2011 SRI NANDAN RAI @ NANDAN RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.03.2011 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner renews his prayer for anticipatory bail in a Police case under Sections 307 and other provisions of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The impugned order as also the injury report enclosed by the petitioner confirms fire arm injury attributable to him. The fact that it may have been occasioned in a land dispute leading to a simple injury are matters to be more appropriately considered in an application for regular bail without being prejudiced by the present order. This application is dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)