IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11631 of 2008 RANI KUMARI @ DHARMSHILA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 13.11.2009. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The claim in this writ application for compassionate appointment demonstrates that earlier the son of the deceased applied. Then, he gave an affidavit that he was not desirous. The daughter of the deceased applied afresh. In the meantime, five years limit for application from the date of death has lapsed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits of a continuity in the applications. Once, the original applicant withdrew his application on 04.12.2005/07.12.2005 and a fresh application was filed by the daughter of the deceased, thereafter on 24.05.2006, the fresh application was not within the time fixed under the Government Policy. This Court finds no infirmity in the impugned order calling for interference. The writ application is dismissed. U.K. (Navin Sinha,J)