1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (Z) NO. 96 OF 2011. IN LETERS PATENT APPEAL STAMP NO.16743 /2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.110 OF 2000(D) Devidas Ambare and others ..Vrs.. Lokmat a daily published and another ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. (Mr. P. D. Randive, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. V. V. Bhangde, Advocate for the respondent No.1.) --00-- CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & P. D. KODE, J J. DATED : NOVEMBER 22, 2011. Prayer is to condone the delay of 34 days in filing Letters Patent Appeal Mr. P. D. Randive, learned Counsel for the appellants states that because of 18 workers involved, it was difficult to obtain instructions and signatures. Mr. V. V. Bhangde, learned Counsel for the respondent No.1 is opposing the prayer for condonation of delay. According to him, the reason disclosed is not sufficient. He also points out that the Member, Industrial Court was not party respondent before learned Single Judge. 2 Preliminary objection raised by the learned Counsel can be looked into while considering the Letters Patent Appeal for admission. However, at this stage, as we do not see any malafides we grant the application for condonation of delay. There is no reason to doubt genuineness of reasons disclosed. Hence, application is granted. Registry to register the letters Patent Appeal and place if for admission. JUDGE JUDGE Deshmukh