'y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WMTPETmONG27) No. 6610 of2008 PETmONERS (Non-applicants) : 1. Bishalram S/o Shri Ramlal Sahu aged about 78 years, Resident of Village Baghamara, Tahsil Balod, Dist. Durg (C.G.) (Civil Died). 2. Bisesar S/o Shri Ram Lal Sahu (Siace died on 7.7.08) throu^i legal representative names are followmg. A. Janak Lal S/o Late Bisesar, aged about 48 vears. B. Smt. Lata Bai D/o Late Bisesar, aged about 44 years, Resident of Village Baghamara, Tahsil Balod- Dist. Durg (C.G.) 3. Khuman Sin^i S/o Shri Ramlal Sahu, aged about 65 years, Village - Baghamara, Tahsil Balod,Dist.Durg(CG.) 4. Chhabi Lal s/o Shd Bodhan SAhu, aged aboirt 45 years, resident of Village - Parsahi Tahsil BAlod & Dist. Durg (C.Q.) 5. Bindabai D/o Shri Ramlal Sahu, aged about 75 years, resident of Village - Belo^ Near, (Village Haldi) Tah. Gunderddu, Dist. Durg (G.G.) 6. Bhuneshwar s/o Shrt Ramlal Sahu, aged about 67 years, Resident of Vilage Baghamara, Tahsil Balod, Dist. Durg(C.G.) VERSUS : 1. Romlal S/o Shri Shivlal Sahu, ^ed about33 years. 2. Minor Somesh Kumar S/o Shri Bharat Sin^i Sahu, throu^i natural guardian mofher Smt. Bansbai Sahu, Both resideut of Village Hirapur (Agriculture Village Ba^iamara) Tahsil Balod, Dist. Durg (C.G.) WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE227 QFTHE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA RESPONDENTS (A^)licants) ;.:-i..^;'^n -2- SB: Hon'ble Shri Sattsh K. Asnthotri^J, fresent: Shn R.S.Patel, Advoeate for tfie petitioners. ORALORDER (Passed on 26"' day of November, 2008) W' 1. Leamed counsel appeariag for die petitioners submits •that the Board of Revenue, Bilaspur, Girsmit Court Raipur, by order dated 1 Apn\ 2008 passed m Revenue Revisioa No. A/05/R/B121/17/08, which is impugiied herein, has remanded back the case to the Collector, Durg wilfa a direetion to consider fhe case a fresh on merits aS.et affording an opportunity ofhearinj to all the parties. 2. Shri Patel fiirther submits that since Ifae issue involved ia the above-stated case has already been settled earlier by (he order passed by the Tehsildar, Balod, which has attained fmality as the same was not taken further to superior authorities underfhe provisions oflaw. 3. In view ofthe submissions and prayer made by leamed counsel for the petitioners, liberty is reserved to the petitionera to raise flais issue before the Collector when the matter is taken upfor hearing pwsuant to &e ordM- dated 1" April, 2008. , 4. In view ofthe above, this petition stands disposed of. No ordw asto csste. 5. Consequently, I.A. No.l, for g-ant ofiaterim relief, I.A. No. 2, for briagng the LRs, and I.A. No. 3 for deletingthe name ofpetitioner No. 1, stuids disposed of. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Anut I,.