IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATrISGARI-i) PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION No. 213% OF 2006 @‘igi? Eighth MV D. Pandey, aged about 59 years, Son of Late Shri Laidhari Pandey, Working as Deputy Ranger, Circle Ramanujganj, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: /. The Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. ‘The Chief Conservator of Forest, / Raipur (C.G.). 1. Ambikapur, District / (C.G.). The Conservator of Forest, Surguja 4. K Surguja Division District Surguja (C.G.). The Collector, District Surguja, ’ Ambikapur, (C.G.). The Divisional Forest Officer, East Ambikapur, 5. The Range Officer, Ramanujganj, /" East Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.). 6. M Shri‘ ,Premsai Guleri, Foreste'r / Special Duty, Dhourpur Range, Dhourpur, District Surguja (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 DF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OE 7L WRIT IN THE ON ETC. MTURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. PROHIBITI Mi. @ f HIGH COURT OF JUDIEATURE AT BILA$PUR EHHATTISGARH Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish Agnihotri Writ Petifion No.21 98 of 2906 VD. Pandey ‘ Versus - State 0f Chhattisgarh and six others Present: Mr, V.K. Pandey, Advocate: For the petitioner. ir. Sushii Dubey, Govt. Advocate: For the State/respondents No.1 to 6. 0§AL ORDER (Passed Gn 1 3t cf May: 2Q06) . The petitioner. who was empioyed as Deputy Ranger working at Ciroie‘ Ramanujganj, District: Surguja, Chhattisgarh, was transferred by order dated 13.4.2006 (Annexure P4) ta Dhuurpur Circle on apeciai duty. The petitioner has fixed this writ petition seeking a writ of csrtioraii for quashing the impugned crd'e} Gateti 13.4.2006 (Annexure P-i). tis further prayed that respohdents No.1 to 4 be directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated period, in accordance with law. . Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at this siege, confines his submission to prayer 7.3 of the petiticn only and learned counsel is not pressing prayer 7.2 of the petition for consideration. in View of prayer 7.3 of the petition to which learned counsel appearing for the Statefrespondents No.1 to 6 has no objection, this oetition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.1 to 4 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure R12). which according to him is b.: Some already pending before respondent No.4 for consideration, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/ production oi a copy of this order. There wilt be no order as to costs. Certified copy as per ruies. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i l l i l i l i l l r