IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19329 of 2010 BHAGWAN DAS AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS SON OF LATE YAMUNA DAS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – PAPU, P.O. MAKARPUR, P.S. MUKHDUMPUR, DISTRICT JEHANABAD. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COLLECTOR, JEHANBAD DISTRICT JEHANABAD. 2. THE COLLECTOR ARWAL, DISTRICT ARWAL. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYTI RAJ OFFICER, JEHANABAD, DISTRICT JEHANBAD. 4. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYTI RAJ OFFICER , ARWAL DISTRICT ARWAL. 5. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER JEHANABAD DISTRICT JEHANABD. ----------- 02. 25.11.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of difference of salary as also the difference of pension, gratuity and earned leave which the petitioner is entitled after granting him the second time bound promotion which he was entitled before the date of his retirement on 31st of October 1998. The other grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the claim for payment on account of G.P.F. for the period 1966-67 to 1972-75 and from September 1995 to August 1997. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State submits that the claims of the petitioner that the petitioner ought to have been granted second time bound promotion, the same can not be considered at this stage in this writ application. However, the payment on account of G.P.F. is concerned, the same shall be verified from the records. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims with regard to payment of G.P.F., petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 5 with a copy to respondent nos. 6 and 8. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable may also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)