IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 15185 of 2008 Decided on : 31.08.2011 ________________________________________________ Rajinder Thakur and others … Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others … Respondents. ___________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?No .1 For the petitioners : Mr. Rupinder Singh and Mr. D.S. Kaith, Advocates, for the petitioners, except petitioner No.4, who is stated to have died. For the respondents : Mr. Anil Jaswal, Dy. Advocate General. ________________________________________________ V.K. Sharma, Judge (oral). CMP(T) No. 247 of 2011 Reply not to be filed. Heard. The application is allowed. Consequently, the proposed legal representatives of deceased petitioner No. 4 Shri Baldev Singh, mentioned in para 2 of the application, are ordered to be brought on record to represent his estate as involved in the present petition. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. 2 Amended memo of parties be filed during the course of the day. The Registry to reflect this order in the list of the parties in red ink. The application stands disposed of. CWP(T) No. 15185 of 2008 The learned counsel for the petitioners submit at the very outset that the case of the petitioners including deceased petitioner No. 4, Baldev Singh, is covered under a Division Bench judgment of this court dated 17.11.2009, in CWP(T) No. 14232 of 2008, Nek Ram and others vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh and others. 2. In view of the above, if on facts, the case of the petitioners is covered under the judgment referred to hereinabove in CWP (T) No. 14232 of 2008, Nek Ram and others vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh and others and the same has attained finality and has been implemented and the petitioners are similarly situate, they shall also be treated similarly without any discrimination and benefit of the said judgment along with consequential benefits, if any, shall be extended to them within three months from the date of production of copies of this judgment and the judgment referred to here-in-above in CWP(T) No. 14232 3 of 2008, by the petitioners before the respondents/competent authority. 3. The petition stands disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. (V.K. Sharma) Judge. 31st August, 2011. Lsp*