IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40307 of 2009 YADUNANDAN PRASAD @ YADUNANDAN MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 02-12-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, for the State and for the informant. Only for the reason that the petitioner did not apprise this Court on 16.10.2009 that charge-sheet had already been submitted on 12.07.2009 when this Court granted him the indulgence of anticipatory bail during the period of investigation, the petitioner has himself to blame this Court declining of exercising jurisdiction. Any application for regular bail has to be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. ( Navin Sinha, J ) BTiwary/