1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 112 OF 2010 WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO. 20263 OF 2009 Manoj Arjandev Mehta ... Applicant (Orig.Plaintiff) Vs. Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority. ... Respondent (Org.defendant) Mr. Omar Khaiyam Shaikh, Advocate, for the applicant. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 15th March , 2010. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant. The Advocate for the respondent is not present. 2. For the reasons given in the Application, delay is condoned. 3. This Appeal is against the refusal of ad-interim relief, while the Notice of Motion is still pending. On hearing the learned Counsel, I find that it will be in the interest of justice to dispose of the Appeal with the following 2 directions :- The trial Court shall hear and finally dispose of the unregistered Notice of Motion Exhibit No.2 in BCCC Suit no.1925 of 2008 within four weeks from the communication of this order. Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. 4. As the Appeal itself is disposed of C.A. Stamp No.20265 of 2009 does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)