IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2639 of 2007 Ram Bahadur Roy, aged about 63 years, S/O Late Medani Roy, R/O Village Ladhouna, P.O. Akbarpur, P.S. Sambho, Dist. Begusarai, at present R/O Jakarpura (Near BDO office), Post. + P.S. Surajgarha, District- Lakhisarai Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Secretary and Commissioner, Department of Health Services, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, namely, Sri Dipak Kumar, son of not known 2. Dr. Gita Prasad, wife of not known, Director-in-Chief, Health Services, family and health welfare Department, Sheikhpura, Patna 3. Narsing Upadhyaya, S/O not known, District Magistrate, Lakhisarai 4. Dr. Ved Bhanu Prasad, Civil Surgeon, Lakhisarai 5. Sri Nilkamal son of Sri R.P.Singh, District Provident Fund Officer, Munger 6. Dr. Indrajeet Prasad, S/O not known Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Suryagarha, Dist. Lakhisarai, cum Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Primary Health Centre, Suryagarha, Dist. Lakhisarai 7. Sri Vidyadhar Prasad, S/O not known, at present working as clerk in the office of Primary Health Centre, Suryagarha, Dist. Lakhisarai 8. Sri Gopal Prasad, S/O not known, at present working as dealing clerk in the office of Civil Surgeon, Lakhisarai 9. Sri P.K.Jha, son of not known, District Treasury Officer, Lakhisarai 10. Sri Indradeep Singh Dhariwal, son of not known, Accountant General, Bir Chand Patel Path, Bihar, Patna. ----------- 5. 13.7.2009 No one appears for the petitioner. However, in the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no. 6, the Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Suryagarha, District- Lakhisarai, it is stated that the petitioner being the husband of the deceased having been found entitled to pension, recommendation for the same has been sent to the Accountant General, Bihar.It is further stated that with respect to payment of gratuity, a payment order has been issued in favour of the petitioner and his sons. With respect to payment of other retiral dues, it is submitted that since in terms of the direction of this Court succession certificate has not been produced by the petitioner, no payment has 2 been made in the absence of any nomination by the deceased employee. In the above circumstances no case for initiating contempt proceeding is made out. The application is accordingly dismissed. S. Pandey (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)