6amé...."é,m, IN THE HIGH w.P. COURT (S\ N0. OF WAM. CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR / 201C / Sukhsagar Das Mahant S/o Shn' Budhwar R/o P H No 29, Das Aged 38 years I Gopalpur Tahsil Katghora District Korba V k CG VERSUS State Of Chhattisgaxh PETITIONER Through Department Secretary Of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, ?‘*" / Raipur (CG) District Conector, Korba (C.G.) Sub—divisional Ofticer (Revenue) District K’atgho’ra (C.G.) Tahsildar, Tahsil Katghora District Korba, (CG) / RESPONDENTS 1. 'WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226z227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN’ THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR STICE IN THE MATTER x ORDER TO DO JU w /@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR- WRIT PETITION (S) No. 4496 of2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri‘ J. Shri Sunil Otwam', Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakm, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 12 day ofJuly, 201 1) Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits tha1 the petitioner has already continued at the original place of posting for almost 11 months on account of interim order granted by this Court 13.08.2010. The State/respondents may be granted liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in view public interest and administrative exigeney. Shri Thakur further submits that the State/respondents shall not insist upon compliance ofthe impugled order dated and 27.07.2010 (Armexure P/S) in respect of the petitioner. At this stage, when no effect could be gven to the impugied order dated 27.07.2010 (Annexure P/5) on accoum of the interim order dated 13.08.2010, thus, it is not necessary to go into legality and validity ofthe aforestated impugned orders. In view of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. sd/— Satish K. Agnihotii Judge PETITIONER : Sukhsagar Das Mahau't. VERSUS ‘ RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others.