1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 6th day of September, 2011 First Bail Application No. 710 of 2011 Criminal Side Shama Parween W/o Kameel Ahmad R/o Old City, Baradari District Bareilly, At present tenant at the house of Gupta Ji at Mohalla Bailejali Lodge, Haldwani, District Nainital …….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…..Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime/F.I.R. No. 240 of 2011 Under Sections: 3,4,5,6,7 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 Police Station: Haldwani District: Nainital Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. A.K.Sah, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. B.S.Parihar, Brief Holder, present for the State. 2 Heard. Applicant– Shama Parween, who is in jail in connection with Case Crime/F.I.R. No. 240 of 2011, relating to offences punishable under section 3,4,5,6,7 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, Police Station Haldwani, District Nainital, has sought her release on bail. Applicant is a woman. Learned counsel for the applicant pleaded that even if the contents of First Information Report are accepted as true, ingredients of most of the alleged offences are not made out atleast as against the applicant, as neither she was running a brothel house, nor she had dragged to anyone to prostitution. She is in jail for last more than one month. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail. The Bail Application is allowed. Let the applicant- Shama Parween be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nainital. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt.06.09.2011 Nahid 3