In the Punjab and Haryana High Court, at Chandigarh. CRM-M- 20202 of 2011 Decided on July 27,2011 Jagsir Singh alias Kala --Petitioner vs. State of Punjab --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.R.K.Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.A.S.Rai,DAG, Punjab. Rakesh Kumar Jain,J:(Oral) This is a petition for regular bail pending trial under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short,'Cr.P.C.') in a case registered vide FIR No.18 dated 22.2.2011, under Sections 307, 325, 324,323,,395,148,149 IPC read with Sections 25/54/59 Arms Act at Police Station Moonak, District Sangrur. The petitioner had applied for interim bail before the Court below on the ground that he had married with Kamaljeet Kaur against the wishes of both sides. She is in advance stage of pregnancy and no body is there to attend her. Therefore, he be released on interim bail to look after her. The said application was rejected by the Court below vide order dated 20.6.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has attached certificate of Bhatia Nursing Home (Annexure P2) who has testified that Kamaljeet Kaur is pregnant. She was admitted Blood Transfusion and is expected to deliver the child in the first week of August, 2011. CRM-M- 20202 of 2011 -2- Notice of motion was issued in this case. After appearance of the State Counsel, the Investigating Officer of this case was directed by this Court to make an enquiry from Bhatia Nursing Home as well as about the fact as to whether there is no one to look after the wife of the petitioner at this juncture. The learned State Counsel has placed on record the enquiry conducted by the Investigating Officer, according to which the petitioner are two brothers and the younger brother is living with his mother separately, whereas his father has already expired. Kamaljeet Kaur is living separately with her daughter aged about 2 and ½ years. Learned counsel for the respondent, however, submits that there are three other cases registered against the petitioner. In this regard, learned counsel has referred to FIR No.67 dated 20.3.2009, registered under Sections 376,342,34 IPC,at Police Station Moonak. The other two cases are bearing FIR No. 17 dated 18.2.2009 registered under Sections 326,324,34 IPC at Police Station Moonak and FIR No.45 dated 22.4.2009 registered under Sections 25/54/59 Arms Act at Police Station Moonak. However, in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of this case, on humantarian ground, the petitioner is granted interim bail for a period of one month up to 30.8.2011, in order to look after his wife, who is expected to deliver the child in the first week of August, 2011, on his furnishing bail bonds with heavy surety to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. He is directed to surrender before the trial Court on 1.9.2011. This petition stands disposed of. July 27,2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge