IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.13347 of 2011 Date of Decision.28.07.2011 Harbir Singh Dhindsa son of Sh. Ajit Singh Dhindhsa resident of Street No.3, Sangatpura Patiala Gate, Nabha District Patiala .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through the Secretary Home Department, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Punjab at Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Notice of motion. 2. At the asking of Court, Mr. Navdeep Sukhna, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents to secure instructions. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall supply four copies of the writ petition and the type set to the counsel for the State. 3. The petitioner will have an appropriate representation to the 4th respondent seeking for protection and if such a representation is given, the 4th respondent will consider it and take action in accordance with law. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 28, 2011 Pankaj*