IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH OCTOBER 2011 / 27TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 27693 of 2011(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- KAVITHA.S., UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOLASSISTANT (UPSA), VHSS, BRAHMAMANGALAM, VAIKOM. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI SRI.BRIJESH MOHAN SRI.T.R.SADEESAN SRI.T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETRIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOTTAYAM-686 001. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KADUTHURUTHY-686 604. 4. THE MANAGER, V.H.S.S. BRAHMAMANGALAM, VAIKOM-686 614. BY GOVT.PLEADER SHRI M.A.FAYAZ FOR R1 TO R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN WP(C).No. 27693 of 2011(J) PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B2/9100/07/K.DIS DATED 4/12/2007 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P1- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B3-25147/07/D.DIS DATED 07/5/2008 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P1- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B2-417/10. K.DIS DATED 15/3/2010 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P1- TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE dsn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C)No.27693 OF 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as Upper Primary School Assistant in the school managed by the 4th respondent. 2. It is averred in the Writ Petition that the petitioner was initially appointed from 3.7.2006 and during the academic year 2006-07 in a promotion vacancy of one Smt.Saritha, the petitioner was appointed. But the appointment was not approved as Smt.Saritha was not granted approval as High School Assistant. The proposal which was submitted later was also rejected by Exhibit P1. It is pointed out in paragraph No.3 of the Writ Petition that the 4th respondent already forwarded the proposal for approval of appointment of the petitioner in a vacancy of one Smt.Mini Divakaran, whose promotion as High School Assistant has been approved. But that was also rejected as per Exhibit P3 order. The petitioner has preferred Exhibit P4 revision petition under Rule 92 of Chapter XIV-A KER against Exhibits P2 and P3. The petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the revision petition Exhibit P4. WPC No.27693/2011 2 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 3. 4. There will be a direction to the Government to take a decision on Exhibit P4 revision petition after hearing the petitioner and the Manager within a period of five months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will forward a copy of the Writ Petition along with a copy of this judgment to the Government for compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-( T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn