IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14150 of 2009 Between: Smt. Chelasani Lakshmi. ..... PETITIONER. AND Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam, represented by its Cosmmissioner, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENT. ORDER: The petitioner claims right vis-à-vis an extent of Acs.5.00 cents in Sy.Nos.64/29 and 64/30 of Pedagantiyada Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam. It is stated that the petitioner got the property under a Will from her father and her father, in turn, acquired the property under a possessory agreement executed in the year 1971. A reference is made to an order, dated 18.11.2007, passed by this Court, in W.P.No.29603 of 1997 filed by Sri V. Venkata Satyanarayana Raju and Sri V.Sanyasi Raju. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent is trying not only to dispossess her but also making attempts to construct upon the land. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. There are several disputed questions of fact, which need to be decided. Though it is urged that the father of the petitioner was acquired the property under possessory agreement of the year 1971, it is the vendors, who filed W.P.No.29603 of 1997 claiming possession. Therefore, it is not clear as to who is in possession and who is exactly the owner of the property. When such is the uncertainty, this Court cannot grant any relief to the petitioner. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. If the petitioner so advised, she can approach the civil Court and work out her remedies, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. Superfluous Becomes ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Date:03.12.2009 Note: Issue CC by three days. (Bo) sj