IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. MPs No. 11078, 11079 & 11080 of 2013 in Cr. MMO No. 111 of 2010 Decided on: 10.08.2017 _______________________________________________________________ Deepak Khosla …..Applicant/petitioner Versus Pavan Bakshi & others ……Non-applicants/respondents _______________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No. _______________________________________________________________ For the applicant/petitioner : None. For the non-applicants/respondents : None. ___________________________________________________________________________________ Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (oral) Cr. MPs No. 11078, 11079 & 11080 of 2013 Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate, appears and states that on the last date of hearing, he was instructed by the applicant/petitioner to make request for adjournment only for that day and today he has no instruction whatsoever to appear on his behalf. 2. The case was called repeatedly, however the applicant/petitioner has not chosen to appear before this Court, in addition to that, the applicant/petitioner has also not taken steps for the service of private respondents. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Therefore, the applications stand dismissed for non- appearance, as also for want of prosecution. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge 10th August, 2017 (raman)