IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3925 of 2010 SUDHIR RAM S/O SAKALDEO RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GHAT KOSUMBHA, P.S.-KORMA, DISTRICT- SHEIKHPURA. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS, SHEIKHPURA. 3.NALINI KANT SINGH S/O LATE HARI KANT SINGH 4.RAJNI KANT SINGH S/O LATE HARI KANT SINGH, BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE- BADAHIYA, DHANRAJ TOLA, P.S. BARAHIYA,DISTRICT – LAKHHISARAI. For the petitioner : Mr. Prasad, Advocate. For the State: Mr. S.P.Tripathy, S.C.7. 2 8.3.2010 Petitioner who claims himself to be the sharecropper of the land in question is aggrieved by order 30.10.2009, Annexure-2, passed by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Sheikhpura, respondent no.2, in sharecropper Case No.9/10 of 2008-09 whereunder the claim of the petitioner to initiate a proceeding under section 48E (1) of the B.T.Act has been rejected on the ground that the request of the petitioner to initiate such proceeding is misconceived as petitioner has not provided any detail of the lands in question in his application which is contained in Annexure-1. He has also not stated in petition about the threat which was extended by the landlord including the names of the persons witnesses in whose presence the threat was extended. In the circumstance, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter. This application is dismissed. (V.N.Sinha,J.) AnilKr.Sinha