C-482 No. 1004 of 2009 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. G.C. Lakhchaura, Advocate present for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder present for respondent No. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Brief Holder for respondent No. 1. By means of this petition, moved under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 28.04.2009, passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, in criminal revision No. 09 of 2009, whereby said court has affirmed the order dated 20.12.2008, passed by Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur, in criminal case No. 466 of 2007, Mehendi Hasan Vs. Shyam Singh and others, relating to offences punishable under Section 420, 467, 471, 218 of I.P.C., police station Jaspur, District U.S. Nagar. Brief facts of the case are that the criminal complaint appears to have moved by the petitioner who requested the Magistrate to pass orders under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. The Magistrate, after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, registered the case as a criminal complaint, examined the complainant under Section 200 of Cr.P.C., and also the witnesses under Section 202 of Cr.P.C. After examining the evidence on record, the trial court found that there is no substance in the criminal complaint, and the same was dismissed under Section 203 of Cr.P.C. Aggrieved by said order dated 20.12.2008, the petitioner / complainant filed the criminal revision No. 09 of 2009. After hearing the parties, the revisional court concurred with the view taken by the trial court, and dismissed the revision. The complainant’s case is that he is bhumidhar of the land in question at Gata No. 18-A, measuring 0.30 acres, in village Jaspur Patti, Tehsil Jaspur, and his name was entered in the municipal record. However, the accused / respondents on the basis of gift deed dated 29.08.1973, said to have been allegedly executed by Nyadar Singh, claimed the title over the property in dispute. The disputed questions of fact raised by the petitioner cannot be examined by this Court in its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. Therefore, the petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is dismissed summarily. (P.C. P., J.) 25.02.2010 HN