IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 172 of 2009 (S/B) Km. Beena Agarwal. .……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & another. .………. Respondents Mr. R.K. Raizada & Mr. I.D. Paliwal, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for the respondents. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous, in view of the fact that the impugned transfer order dated 31.07.2009 (Annexure No. 1) has since been withdrawn by the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents acknowledges the factual position submitted on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the above, CLMA No. 10702 of 2009 is allowed. Writ Petition No. 172 of 2009 (S/B) is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 10.12.2009 10.12.2009 G