0^[y^ IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTESeARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETCTCON (S) NO...£.Q/.6/2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^. .^%^ '..^^^y ^ '.^KF '^••^.>' ~y. ip-' A" . c<" -&••' .-..•^'' \1' Yogesh Patel, Son of Shri Jawahar Lal Pate!, aged about 47 years, (U.&.T.), R/o. Village Kelovihar Colony, Raigarh, District Raigarh, working in 6ovt. Hr. Sec. School, Nandeli, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.), VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Education Depart- ment, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.6.), 2.'"^ Oistrict Educatin Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.6.), 3. Block Education Officer, Raigarh, DistrictRaigar-h (C.6.) 4. Principal, Govt. Hr. Secondary School, Nandeli, Tahsil & District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETETCON UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE COUNSTETUTION OF INDIA XI-HC—78 w*«ni«iNi<*i ^ST -<11'410AI, ©til'H'Ko,^CIiyy ..U:..6:..Cs?...'Ofc?.:..fio.<6, [fi 200 sn^i TR;P (T^^IT) 311^1 ^I k-U* ^TT 3TT^?T^)HTqi ^<nw ^fei .?ii^i c. 1 ^^A»A. Shri R.S.Patel, coiinsel for Sm.t. Smita Ghai, P.L. for fh| Counsel for ttie petitioner entitled to benefit oftwo advauce having passed D.Ed. examiaatio1 own cost. It is subiaitted that fb.< petition is ao longer res integra. decided by fhe Hontsle Suprem.* Saxeaa Vs. State of M.P. 8s Ors. It is furttier subniitted tha1 similar view in its order dated 6. 6257/2008. Counsel for fue petit order dated 29..4.2010 oassed ii whereiti relyiag upon the judgraei case ofAsha Saxena (supra) aad in. another Writ Appeal No. 87 issued for consideration of the fl increiuents a.s per circular dated of Madhya Pradesh, aSjei verifical petitioa. Couiisel for the State subnli woilld also be considered on fhe sfe submits that. the petitioner is iDcreiaents on accouiit. of he after his appouitauent at his issue uivolved in the present (ad tlie sasiie has been fiiiaUy Court iu. fhe case of •t 'wifepN •wraf'ijfezt tfai-^ ^aTfimsn^H [le petitioner. State. tliis Court has also taken a 12.2009 passed iu W.P.(S) No. loner fiirtlier subinits tJiat the Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, [t of fhe Suprenie Court ia the Lhe oixler passed by this Court 2009, directions have been ase for graiit of two advaace 21.9.1974 issued bv the State ion of the facts pieaded in the its that case of fhe ane lines. Qt ^ XI-HG—78 'S^! -^ww^, 0itll<-l'l<s, [siyiyy 3^\ 'T^T (^{^^ET) 3TT^I ^T f<4i<sb '?Ten ^T^T'gTTH^ ^iiWHfpisn^r In view of above, fhe pe^ direction to the icspondent authoijities petitioner for grant of two advanj dated 21.9.1974 issued by the ^tate verijB.cation of fhe facts pleaded ia| eight weeks from today. ct>TalTcl41'l *-ii*i<n'i ^ ^^ <ffli<^i< ^? aifBT 3ii^?i ition is disposed of with a to decide the claim of fhe :e increinents as per circular of Madhya Pradesh after the petition withia a period of Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge