,‘. Q W CD iiefw“ w £6" [652‘ ‘ .n‘” V IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 3mm 3m W.P.rs'.)No. Maw >/2010 @ PETITIONER: Moti Lal Sahu S/o Shri Thanu Ram Sahu, Aged about 45 years, Presently working as Forest Guard, Mahasamund, Forest Division Baghbahra Range, District ' Mahasamund R/ o Baghbahra ward No 9 Baghbahra District Mahasamund (CG) VERSUS .// RESPONDENTS 1.’ State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary Forest Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Conservator of Forest Ralpur Circle Jail Road Raipur (C G ) 3. The Divisional Forest Officer Mahasarnund Division District Mahasamund (C.G. ) x WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE N CONSTITUTION OF INDIA mm Wf62wki°z° ° V 200 31mm (mu) WWW ammamia? WHW‘&WW mmm $mm SB: Hon’hle Shri Manindra Moll an Shrivastava, J. 2.8.2010 Shri CR. Sahu, counsel fo‘ Shri Vinod Tekam, Pane Lawyer for the State/respondents, on advance copy. Learned counsel for th petitioner submits that though the petitionet has been found fit fo promotion on application of out of turn promotion scheme under Chha 'sgarh Class-III (Non-Ministerial) Forest Service Recruitment Rules, 19 [respondents are not promoting the petitioner, though earlier Icom unication dated 21.4.2008 has been declared illegal by this Court in batch of petition W.P. (S) No.1775/2008 (Devnandan Tiwari 85 another further submitted that the sa Devnandan Tiwari has been granted promotion, but the case of th petitioner has not been considered. A representation has been made, b t the same has not been decided. Taking into consideration he submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, it would b appropriate to direct respondents to consider the claim of the petitio er in View of order dated 215i April, 20lO passed in W.P. (S) No.1775/08 CG. & others}. The respondents shall ta e decision with regard to claifn~of the petitioner within a reasonable ti e. With the aforesaid directi ns, the petition stands finally disposed off. Mn . 7;» A‘&k‘ Sd/_ ., 1,, . the petitioner. evnandan Tiwari & another Vs. State of gamma Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ‘ i