MC 1758/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I A ANSARI HON’BLE MR JUSTICE A C UPADHYAY Heard Mr. A. Sarma, learned Senior counsel, appearing on behalf of the applicant , and Ms. C. Chakraborty, learned Central Government counsel, appearing on behal f of opposite party No. 1. Heard also Ms. B. Goel, learned counsel, appearing o n behalf of opposite party No. 2, and Mr. D. K. Mishra, learned Senior counsel, appearing on behalf of opposite party Nos. 3, 7 and 8. Having considered the matter in its entirety and in the interest of just ice, while the applicant’s prayer for impleadment of proforma respondents-opposi te party Nos. 18 and 19, namely, Union of India, and the Meghalaya Government We ighbridge Lessee Myselin Warr, respectively, as party respondents to the writ pe tition, is allowed, the applicant’s prayer for impleadment of proforma responden ts-opposite party Nos. 20 and 21, namely, the Khasi Hills Autonomous District Co uncil Lessee Malantis Mawlott, and the Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, respectively, is declined. The applicant’s prayer for deletion of the names of t he respondent Nos. 3, 7 and 8, namely, Phylla Singh Sylem, the Sirdar of Riangsi h and the Sirdar of Jyrngam, respectively, from the list of respondents to the w rit petition, is also hereby allowed. Let the writ petition be amended accordingly and the same be placed, for further necessary orders, on 02.02.2011. This Misc. case stands disposed of in terms of the above observations an d directions.