IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32525 of 2007 DHIRAJ KUMAR @ LADDU Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 6 09.10.2009. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated passed by the Additional Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court No. III, Patna in Sessions Trial No. 337 of 1998, whereby he rejected the application of accused persons to discharge them under section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner submits that his plea of juvenility has not been considered and discussed in the impugned order rejecting his petition filed under section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. So far merit of the case is concerned, this Court upholds the order of the learned trial court. The plea of juvenility cannot be rejected on the ground that the same can not be raised after commitment of the case. The impugned order is set aside. The case is remanded back to the trial court to consider the plea of juvenility of the petitioner in accordance with law and pass appropriate order. The petition is allowed accordingly. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J).