HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURB CHHAmSGARH: BLLASPU Sia^eBeach: Hoa'bte Shri Satish K. Agsifcotri, J. Ssview PetiSion So. 43cf^iQ07 Applicant : R.^^3jJZ> >/3.=n+- i\c:aijuuucu-Lo Sanjay Jadhwani, sonofLate Shri Manohar Lal Jadhwani, agcd about 38 years, PiDprietorM/s Sanjay Autoiuobiles, M.G. Road, Raipurand resideat of Ll<j-8, Indravati Colony, Ksaipur. Versus : 1. Smt Geeta Bai, wife ofShri Bal Dahadur Najmdeo, a^ed about 65 17-ytf^-w fdssff^cLt^'i- /tf-. T<vmr-/>^-><»-?~ M^S/T'"!-?' j'</«AA.^>, A^/iSlkAt-iJ.t \J1 <^ ci"rV uJticil l.iCi.geUL, Kaipur. 2, Rajesh Kumar Naindeo, son of Late Sllri KaUu Prasad Nanideo, resident of :T7r.f~*->^->y !\,f f^tVTtf t^'~ii-s"tiit~ fvcu.lc^A licl^ci.i, I'vCu.pLU.. RE\"EW PETITON ON THE ^A'ALOGY OF RULBS 75 & 76 OFTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISQARH RULES, 2005 READ Wn'H ORDER 47 RULE1OFTHE CODE OF C".rIL PROCEDURE, 1908. Shri Ajit Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Shri N. K. Vyas, Advocate for the respoadents. <^1BAT t^ 1"^ S^'S? fSSM^SS^ Passed on tliis 6th of , 20081 1. I.A.No. 1 for condonation of delay in filir.g the review petition. is ordeied, as piayed for. The delay is condoned. 2. Leanied counsel appearing for the appUcant as weU as leamed counsel appearing for the respoadeats submit thatliliere'seeais to be omission on fhe part of fhe writer of ftie judgHient and orier dated 30th ApriS, 2007 passed in V/.P.(C) No. 2530 of 2007 (Sanjay Jadhwani Vs. Smt. Geeta Bai & another), It was dictated in fhe open Court that the Court below, wherein the ^2_ — 2- Civit Suit No. 36-A/07 is pending, woiild decide the matte expeditiously preferabfy withui a period offour months, 3. After having coasidered the subiaissions of leamed counsel appearing for t1~ie parties, it appcars that. t.he oi'der datRn 30th Apr3, 2007 paased in W.P.(C) No. 2530 of 2007, dfctated ia open Coiirt, co-iild not.be lyped iu its entirely. Accorilingly, VI?'1'- Ciyil Judge, Class-II, Raipur is directed to deGide the pending Civil Suit No. 36-A/07, as expeditiously as j»8sible, preferably within a period of four monfh.s from fhe date of rcceipt of a copy ofthis order. 4. In view ofthe foregoing, this review petition stauds disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur