CWP No. 283 of 1999. 11.3.2010 Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for the respondents. This petition has been taken up twice during the course of the day today but none has appeared for the petitioner. The writ petition has been dismissed for default on 13.3.2008. The learned Assistant Solicitor General of India has brought to our notice order dated 19.11.2004, which is as follows:- “We have perused the record of the present writ petition. In terms of the office memorandum dated 21st July, 1999 marked Annexure: RE whereby and whereunder the Government of India, Department of Pension and Pensioners’ Welfare have decided that the Family Pension will, however, be payable to the parents of deceased Ramesh Chand who was serving as Constable (RT) in 8th Battalion, C.R.P.F. Gauhati w.e.f. 1st January, 1998, the present writ petition does not survive and it accordingly stands disposed of.” The learned Assistant Solicitor General submits that thereafter a review petition was filed where the petitioner sought to plead and urge grounds for compassionate employment to the family member of the deceased. By its order dated 2.4.2007 passed in Civil Review No. 55 of 2004, this court ordered:- “A perusal of the order dated 19.11.2004 clearly reflects that the petition was disposed of on the ground that the family pension has been released to the petitioner, but the question whether any member of the family is entitled to get employment or not was not considered by this court. This contention has been raised in this writ petition. We, therefore, allow the review petition to the limited extent that the petitioner can argue that he is entitled to employment on compassionate ground from the respondents. The review petition is disposed of accordingly. List the writ petition No. 283 of 1999 on 11.4.2007.” We do not find any pleadings or prayer for compassionate appointment in the writ petition. Nobody appears for the petitioner to assist us in the case and to bring on record additional facts with respect to the relief of compassionate appointment claimed. This writ petition, is therefore, disposed of with the direction that the respondent shall consider the case of the petitioner for compassionate employment in case she makes a representation in this behalf. The respondent shall dispose of the representation of the petitioner by a speaking order and in accordance with the norms applicable for compassionate appointment within a period of three months from the date such representation is made. The order passed by this court be communicated to the petitioner forthwith. The writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ( Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. March 11, 2010. ( Kuldip Singh ), (Hem) Judge.