IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1138 of 2008 KEDAR NATH SINGH, son of Late Dwarika Singh, resident of Village Katyri, P.S. Korma, District Sheikhpura. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through its Secretary, Department of Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, Department of Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Provident Fund, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Patna. 5. The District Education Officer, Patna. 6. The District Provident Fund Officer, Patna. 7. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr Ranjan Kumar, A.C.to AAG 4. For the Accountant General : Mr Binod Kumar Labh, Standing Counsel I.A. & A.D. ------ 2. 27.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the learned counsel appearing for the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of the amount deposited in the suspense account as also some grievance with regard to the payment of interest over the G.P.F. The petitioner superannuated on 31st of December, 1997 as Principal of S.K.M. + 2 High School, Mokama, Patna. It is submitted that the aforesaid amount has not been paid to the petitioner with interest permissible over the said amount. Learned counsel for the State submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law. 2 In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of the aforesaid grievances, although the petitioner had represented his grievances by filing a representation, however, proposes to file separate representation before the District Education Officer, Patna (respondent no.5) and the District Provident Fund Officer, Patna (respondent no.6). In case such separate representations are filed stating distinctly the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representations shall be disposed of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation could be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest as per rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)