1 wp 7621.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7621 OF 2011 Chandrakalabai Dattarao Garole .. Petitioner Versus Pralhad Pandurang Gaikwad and others .. Respondents Shri S. K. Chavan, Advocate for the Petitioner. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 04TH OCTOBER, 2011. PER COURT : . The present petitioner had preferred an appeal against the order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer condoning the delay of 16 years. The said appeal is dismissed on the ground that the appeal is not maintainable in view of Sec. 252 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. 2. Sec. 252 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code bars the remedy of appeal against an order condoning the delay or against any interim order. In view of that the appeal filed by the 2 wp 7621.11 petitioner before the Collector was not maintainable and same has been rightly disposed of as not maintainable. 3. The present writ petition also need not be entertained in view of the fact that even though an appeal does not lie against the order condoning the delay, still there is no bar for the petitioner to invoke the revisional jurisdiction and revision would always be maintainable against an order condoning the delay. 4. Shri Chavan, the learned counsel submits that his appeal may be treated as revision and he has filed a pursis to that effect also. The petitioner may file fresh revision if so advised. The authority before whom the said revision is filed shall consider the same on its own merits. The authority shall also consider the time spent in prosecuting the appeal and present writ petition while considering ground of delay if any. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Oct. 11