IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.774 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 19.1.2010 Som Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.D.S.Pheruman, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner alleges that the retiral benefits have not been released to him despite there being no legal embargo. It is claimed that in the corruption case, FIR has already been cancelled by the Court for want of sanction and thereafter, the petitioner cannot be deprived of his retiral dues. The petitioner is stated to have made representations dated 15.9.2007 (Annexure P-7) and 11.11.2009 (Annexure P-8) but in vain. In view of the above, however, without expressing any views on the petitioner's claim, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the claim of the petitioner for C.W.P.No .774 of 2010 (O&M) 2 his retiral benefits as contained in his afore-mentioned representations, by passing a speaking order preferably within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Disposed of. Dasti. 19-01-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE