.^^•"e^ ...-..-^..——-.....„.-.-._...--....—..- /^?~- ^fi'^ \ HiGH COURTOF_CHHATT1SGARH AT BILASPuR . [<-S-:> I i "I J Writ Petition No. of: ^5. y1;^. ^y .^' '^ 'i^vass^" .y ^iss.sss'^ Petltioners : 1. Siriivus Lakra S/o Dira Aaed about 58 yrs, Assistant Tes.cher 2. Theodor Kujur S/o Barnabus Aged about42 yrs, Assistant Teacher 3. Bhinsent Ekka S;'o Simon A.a-ed about 55 vrs, Assistant Teacher 4. Gabrieal Minj S/o Birsai Aged about 60 vrs, Assistant Teacher ASI are working at & Address are:- Sahayika Primary Schoo! Jokbahala (Boys) Dlstt. Jashpur (C.G.) Versus ResDondents : 1. Stafe of Chhafdsflarh, Throuah the Secretary, Department of Schoo! Education, Mantralay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Dlrector, Directorates of Pub!ic Instruction, Pension Bada Raipur (C.G.) 3. Ths District tducation Offic.er Pubiic instructions Jashpur (C.G.) 4. The Chairman / Manager, Sahayika Primar, Schoo! (Boys) JokbahaSa, Christian Peopies Committee Jokbahaia Distt. Jashpur SB: Hon'ale Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri Present: !V1r. N. Malviya, counsei for ihe petitioners. Nls. Deepaii Pandey, Pan.e! lawyer for the respondents/S'tate on this 12 day of April, 2007) 1. The auastion of !aw invoived herein is whether the non-teaching staff workins in Government aidsd school are entit'ied to t'ne benefit of recomiTiendaiions of the Flfth Pav Commission under t'ne Drovlsions of ths ryladhya Pradssh As'nasklva Siks'nan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Anya Kai'rnchariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) Adhiniyam, 1978 (henceforth 'ths Adhiniyam, 1978') and the ruies made thereunder read with the Madhya Pradesh Revision of Pay Ruies, 1988 (hsnceforth 'the Pay Rules, 1988'). 2. The identica! question of law was considered by thls Court in bateh of matters i.e. Srnt. A. Lail vs. State of Chhattisaarh and other connected rnatters (W.P. No. 4108 of 2005) and by judgment and order dated 3.2.2007, this Court he!d that the petitioners vcho are worklng in fuHy Government aided private schools are entitied to the revised pay-scales with effsct from 1.1.1996 as prescribed under the Pay Rules, 1988. This Court furtner for the purpose of payment of arrears had granted certain dirsction. 3. Admittedly ana' jointiy, it is submitted by the parties that this matter is squareiy coverea' by the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed by t'nis Court in t'ne case of Smt. A. Lali vs. State of Chhattisgarh and other connected matters (Suoi'a). 4. As a result, for the reasons stated in the judgment and order dated 5.2.2007 passed in W.P. No. 4108 of 2005 (SmS. A. Lail vs. of Chhattisgarh and other connected matters'i (Supi'a). The writ Detition is iiiowed in the same term-s and conditions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge