z€\ omiw‘ OF 'JUDI‘CMURE Air JA3AL FUR. writ yetitian No.’/g% @2000. ‘ iN THE HIGH C Eetitigner a $unil Kumar Namdeo son of Late B.s. NamdeO, aged about 25 yeam, resident of stadium Road, Kata, Raipur, district Raipur, ELF. Versus ? Respondesxta : 1=— Pt.Ravishanker $hukla University Raipur (mm), Thmugh the Vic‘e Chancellor. 2— Vice Chaacellor, Ptg Ravishanker shukla University, Raipur. M. F. 3a— shri Kailamh Kumar Yadav, sen of Latw, Sewaram Yada‘u resi§ent of Kata wam-a Paipur, district: Raj-Putt Mo Po .§> 4~ Shri Radheshyam Yadav sen of Late Nathuram Ya&av. L .D.C ..‘ Pt.Ravi ‘ Shanker Shukla Univérsity. Raipura ‘ 1 i Petiiiion unaer Article 22g 227 of Censtitution sf 1mg A-‘F‘F‘ .‘_"_. n . . . . .. XLHC 78 mm (Wu) (d?W 200 a&$an $ wm& $w $ 1%mMa&aa&w WW WIfW awffdqm $3.: HON’ELE JUSTICE MR. ?R1TII§KER DKWAKER 15.11.2011 Noni: for the petitioner. “x Faven after the matter was called in the second round. § none appeared for the petitioner, therefore, in these CircumsfancesP this Conn has no other option but to dismiss The petition for want of prosecution. Accordingiy’ the petition is dismissed for Want of prosecution Sdl- ‘ Pritinker Diwaker Judge