1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4702 OF 2009 Sopan s/o Bubasaheb Chaugule, Age: 51 years, Occ: Agri., R/o. Alani, Tq. & Dist. Osmanabad & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through it's Principal Secretary, Co-operation, Marketing and Textile Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others. .. Respondents ... Mr. P.S. Chavan, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. D.R. Kale, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos.1 to 3. Mr.S.B. Patil, Advocate for respondent NO.4. ... CORAM : K.K. TATED, J. DATE : 8TH SEPTEMBER, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, the matter is taken up for final hearing at admission stage. 2 2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and learned Counsel for respondent No.4. 3. By this petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are challenging the impugned order dated 26-06-2009 passed by respondent No. 3 thereby rejected the petitioners' objections dated 05-03-2009, 06-03-2009 and 09-03-2009 on the ground that the petitioners failed to produce 145 receipts about payment of membership fees. 4. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners states that it remained on their part to produce the same before respondent No. 3 but now, same are available with them and they are ready to produce the same. In view of this, order passed by respondent No. 3 dated 26-06-2009 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to respondent No. 3 to decidse the 3 same on merits after giving opportunity to the petitioners as well as the respondents to file their affidavit as well as documents in support of their case. It is expected that respondent No. 3 to decide the petitioners' objections dated 05-03-2009, 06-03-2009 and 09-03-2009 within six months from today. 5. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. Rule made absolute in above terms. [ K.K. TATED, J.] sut/SEP09/wp4702.09