<^ J-. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G) W.P.fS)NO. ?>W /2011 PETITIONER A.-""^-^v ^s^ ^yy' . ^v ,<."y ^" ^•>v RESPONDENTS Sunil Kumar Kaushik, aged about 41 years, S/o Shri Narmada Prasad Kaushik, Lecturer, Government Higher Secondary School Baimanagoi, Block Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block Bilha, Distt.Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA ^ '^'^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATI>ISGARHAT BILASPUR SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICB PMTINIffiR DIWAKBR PBTITIONBR W,P.(8LNO. 3861/2011 Suail Kumar Kaushik RBSPONDENTS State of C.Q. 8s Others Shri K.S.Pawar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Praveen Das, Dy. G. A. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226 0»THB CQNSTITUTION OE INDIA ORDER (20.07.2011) By this petition^ the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to consider the oase of the petitioner and provide benefit of PR 22 (D) of the Chhatttsgarh Pundarrienta! Rules^ for grant of incrementa as provided under the rules and also to pay arrears from the date when it became due. At the very outset, counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the identical matter has aSready been considerad and decided by tMs Court vide order dated 27.3.2008 in W.P.(S) No. 4991/2006 and tte case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said decision. Counsel appearing for the State does not diapute that the ease of the petitioner is squarely cavered fcy the order passed by this Coart m W.P*(S) No. 4991/2006. He further submits that if the petitioner ffles fresh representation before the concemed authorities for the reiiefSy which he has claimed by way of thi8 petition, the same shall be con8idered and decxded In accordance with law, subject to verification of facts. Por the foregoing reasons^ the instant petition ia diapoBed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the respondent authorities rai^ing all his grievances raieed in this petition and cn such represenfation being made^ the respondent authorities shal! consider and decide the same in accordance with law on its own merite^ within a period of three months from the date of reoeipt of tte representation. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge