IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2011 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31513 of 2011(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SIVANI, CHOOLAKADAVIL VEETTIL, MANANCHERRY, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA P.O. 2. KUTTAPPAN, S/O.GOVINDAN, IKKARAPARAMBIL, NORTH ARYAD P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 3. GOPINATHAN, DO. DO. 4. SOMASARMAN, DO. DO. 5. THE RESURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA P.O. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.31513/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PURCHASE CERTIFICATE DTD.13/11/1975. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION STYLED AS APPEAL DATED 27/2/2005 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 31513 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 7th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner says that she filed Ext.P2 revision before the 1st respondent invoking his powers under the Survey and Boundaries Act. Going by the date shown in Ext.P2, the revision is dated 27/2/2005. It is complaining of delay on the part of the 1st respondent in disposing of Ext.P2, the writ petition has been filed. 2. However, learned Government Pleader after obtaining instructions submits that Ext.P2 could not be traced out and that therefore the 1st respondent is unable to dispose of the matter. However, since it is the specific case of the petitioner that Ext.P2 was filed and that the 1st respondent forwarded the same to the 5th respondent for report and that the 5th respondent has assigned file No.B1.1030 dated 25/11/2005, prima facie it appears that the revision was in fact filed and if at all the same has been misplaced, that has occurred either in the office of the 1st respondent or in the office of the 5th respondent. 3. Be that as it may, now that it is submitted that the revision is untraceable, I direct that the petitioner will produce a WPC No.31513/11 :2 : copy of this writ petition along with a copy of this judgment and that thereupon Ext.P2 produced along with the writ petition will be treated as a revision filed by the petitioner and on that basis, the 1st respondent will conduct appropriate enquiry with notice to the parties concerned and orders thereon will be passed by the 1st respondent. This the 1st respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within two months of receipt of copy of the judgment as above. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp