IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 7848 of 2008 Decided on: 29.11.2010 Asha Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Ms. Shalini Pandav, Advocate vice Mr. Dinesh Bhatt, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that the tenure service followed by regularization has not been taken into consideration towards the annual increments. This case is covered by Sita Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh, L.P.A. No. 36 of 2010, decided on 15th July, 2010. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent/State to count the period of tenure service, rendered by the petitioner, followed by regularization, for the purpose of annual increments, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge November 29, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?