IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.342 of 2000 BAIDHYA NATH PD. SINGH @ BAIDYNATH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 7. 1.7.2010. None appears. I have heard Sri D.Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State. The proceeding initiated by order dated 26.11.1997 passed in Complaint Case No.649C of 1997 is prayed to be quashed. I find that the offences for which the petitioner has been summoned may not be constituted on the facts of the case. It is not disputed that a genuine sale deed was executed which purported to cancel the earlier deed executed by the executant in favour of the son of the complainant. The act complained of is not covered by the definition of forgery as contained in Section 463 of the Penal Code. The proceeding, as such, is quashed. The petition is allowed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )