IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 50 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2787 OF 2008 Abdul Gafoor Mohd. Yusuf .... Petitioner Vs. The Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Board & Ors. ....Respondents ..... Mr.Devendra Sharma, for the Petitioner. Mr. V.M. Parshurami, for the Respondent no.6. ...... CORAM: DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 2nd July, 2009 P.C. Pursuant to the Order dated 16th February, 2009 passed by the Division Bench, the Repair Board had passed an Order of allotment dated 31st March 2009. The grievance of the Petitioner was that the Order of allotment was not in compliance with the Order passed by the Division Bench, since it was the contention of the Petitioner that the Order required the application of the Petitioner dated 2nd February, 2009 to be considered in the light of the new guidelines. During the course of the hearing of Contempt proceeding, the Advocate for the Petitioner had drawn the attention of the Court to a letter dated 3rd April, 2008 addressed to the Respondents, in which it was stated that : 2 : certain premises viz. Gala Nos.101 to 104 in a building called “Infinity Apartment”, at Mazgaon were available of which the Petitioner sought allotment. In view of this, the learned Counsel for Respondent no.6 had sought an adjournment in order to consider whether the request of the Petitioner could be accepted. At the hearing today, the learned Counsel on behalf of the Respondents has placed on record a letter of allotment dated 1st July, 2009 to the Petitioner. The letter has already been handed over to the Advocate for the Petitioner. The Advocate for the Petitioner stated that the Petitioner accepts the allotment in terms of the letter dated 1st July, 2009 in satisfaction of the Petitioner’s claim for allotment. It has been agreed between the parties that this shall be in lieu of the allotment effected by the earlier letter dated 31st March, 2009 (Exh.’JJ’ to the Contempt Petition). It has been stated on behalf of the Petitioner that the payment shall be effected within one week from today. The learned Counsel for the Respondents states that, subject to due fulfillment of the conditions, as stated in the letter, the Respondents shall hand over possession to the Petitioner within a period of one week thereafter. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner states that the petitioner is advised to apply for a no objection certificate to the Repair Board for amalgamation of the premises. The learned Counsel for the Respondents states that if such a request is made to the Municipal Corporation, the Repair Board shall deal with the matter of the grant of a no objection in accordance with the law. The Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of. ****