IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.715 of 2007 SATYA NARAYAN THAKUR, SON OF LATE SONAI THAKUR, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA SUBHASHNAGAR, P.S. K. HATT, DISTRICT PURNEA. ----PETITIONER Versus 1. THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA. 3. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA. 4. THE FINANCIAL CONTROLLER- I, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA. 5. THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OFFICE OF THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, PURNEA. -----RESPONDENTS ----------- 3. 5.5.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-Board. In view of the statements made in the counter affidavit containing the details of the payment, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the amount which, according to the petitioner, has still remained unpaid, he be given liberty to represent before the Secretary of the Board (respondent no.3). In the above circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to represent his grievances relating to the payment of retrial dues, if any, which has remained unpaid. In case such a representation is filed before respondent no.3 within a period of eight weeks along with the certified copy of the present order, the respondent no.3 shall consider the same and dispose it of by a reasoned order in accordance with law considering the grievances of the petitioner raised in his representation 2 expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months on receipt of such representation, so that the amount, if any, is found payable is paid without any further delay. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)