IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2008 / 21ST JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 17411 of 2008(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ LASITHA.K.K., AGED 48 YEARS, JUNIOR PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE, P.H.C. PANAMARAM, WAYANAD. BY ADV. SRI.JESWIN P.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER (HEALTH), WAYANADU. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.THOMAS JULIEN AMBOOKEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 17411 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 11th June, 2008 J U D G M E N T By Exhibit-P3 order issued by the 1st respondent, petitioner was provisionally proposed to be transferred from Panamaram to Vardoor in Waynad District. Apparently, petitioner did not have any objection to the same. Petitioner's grievance is that by Exhibit-P4 order the place, wherein, the Petitioner was proposed to be transferred has been changed from Panamaram to Meppady. This is apparently for the purpose of accommodating the person who continues at Varadoor. The same has been challenged in this writ petition. In my view, the petitioner is entitled to approach the 1st respondent pointing out the variation from the proposal in Exhibit-P3. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of in the following terms: W.P ( C) No. 17411 of 2008 2 i) If the petitioner approaches the 1st respondent with a representation pointing out these aspects, within a period of two weeks from today, it shall be considered and orders passed by the 3rd respondent, after hearing the petitioner as also any other affected persons, within a period of three weeks thereafter. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No. 17411 of 2008 2 W.P ( C) No. 17411 of 2008 2