é M—n/gleBench IN THE HIGH COURT OF IUDICATURE AT BILASPURCG M i i l 1 i 1 l M g/l’ OF 2006 KgWE APPEAL VALUED AT Rs 80 000 /- APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF TI-[E MOTOR VEHICLES ACT 1988. Abbash Moha ad @ Shaikh qgN-APPLICANT N01) :3: Mohammad , S/O Majid Mohammad aged 24 yeals, R/O-Jaxha Bhatha Mandir Chowk Bilaspur (C.G.), At Present— Dubey’s House, Qt. No. 1 W.A. 8- B, Hirri Mines, P.S.- Hin'i, Tah. & Distt. Bilasput (C.G.). xNON'A'PPuCANTNOZ) ,34» ‘Shantosh Kumar @ Saturam Kurmi S/O Arjun Singh Kurmi aged 39 years, R/O Bhaver Gara, P.S. Daukikohara Dostt. Biaspur, Permanent Address— Dalli Rajhara, Distt.Durg (C.G.)(Truck Driver) @0N-APPLICANTN03) :§. Kafnlesh Kumar Randive ‘S/O Ganesh Rao Randive aged 22 years, R/O— Sasang Road Contractor Colony, Supela, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) (Owner of the Truck) ’ APPELANT : National Insurance Company (NON— APPLICANT X Limited, Divisional— MA) office, Bhootani Complex, _ G. E.Road Bhilai,Distt.- Durg, through:—Its Branch Manager, Taha Complex Vyapar vihar Raod Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS “:1. Ms}. Kaushjlya Bai W/O Late wfAPPLICANT N0. 1) Rajaram Sahu , aged —39yea/rs . (AT’PLICA’N’T NO.2) Tara Ba1 Sahu W/O- Late Derha Sahu, ‘ Aged-60years, Both are R/O- Hirri Mines, Indrapuri, P.S.- Hirri, Tah. & Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) XI—HC—78 ® 3am,mng,mragt M‘fJr‘NV‘ giL oé WWQO'O‘#OO‘O~O§ ~0" ‘0‘ 21:1 200 mm (WW) wéwaa‘rm mmm WW§MW WWW azmm Brief facts of the case are f¢at on 24-04-2004 at about 1‘00 am. the deceased Raja Ram Sahu ard S9nu Sahu ware travemng in Ehe jeep bearing regisération No. C.G.1FO/Z.D./2188. Near vmage Temaii‘ a Tmck No C G GAG/0490 loaded with iron rod extending 4-5 feet out ’ elde the body of ‘he truck was stehding on the road without any signal o: Side hah The said jeep, on hmg near the above piace intruded into the saw] truck. 3n this accade it Raja Ram and Sonu $ahu died on the spot. 15H I209? ‘. Shri Dashra’th IGu'pta, cagns‘fi for the appeuants. Heard on admissmn. This q‘rder shaH govem MA. No. 808I200$. The leamed M. .C.T. awam’ed compemeation of Re, 2,80,000/- and 1,7590% i1 Ciaim Caee Nos. 15212005 aad 1 53/2005 respeciiveiy. Learned courasel for the ppei§arnts further submitted that ihe ameunt of sompensat‘ron award in Ciaim Case Noe.152/2GO5 and 153/2005 has aiready been depo ited by ‘ihe appenant ir; the reamed MAQT. The oniy paint urged by i iearned counseg for the appettahts in both these appeats‘ isrthat the iiab tity to pay compensatiorx ae awatded by the teamed Meter Acctdent a'rms Tribunat ought to have been apportioned and the iiabiiity to p y compensatiOh ought aiso to have been fasterted on the driver of iiifated jeep. No other point was urged by the learned counsel fort e appeiiants. Upon a perusai of the reco oi of Ciaim Case Noe. i52/2OG5 ahci 153/2005 arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the eppeilants cannot be'countenahc cl. Admittedty the twck insLrred by ,the appetlants was standing in t e middle of the road at night with heavy load of iron tools which wer protruding 4—5 feete at the back side L is . I c e h ' t it e f . XI—HC-78 @ .\3_( sf the iruck. No §igh’i, $igna! o Negiigence of the driver of ihe tru of contributory negiigence en ihe in 3M3 View of the matier, m grouiici is made out foi' admission of these appeais. m ihe fesuit, both MA. dismissed ai the stage of admissic in View oi the above, MC Sd-/ Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge i mmm WWW E$W %aaw%qan%¥f r iridicateis were pu’: on the mick. uck is ihus estabiished‘ The quesiion Dari ef the jeep cifiver dues not arise. Noe, 812/2OG$ and 308/2086 are n2 aiso stand dismissed. Ne cider‘as ,.P. Nos. 'i997/2006 end “E32066 to costs. ?e RIO. ' H‘.$.:N§’.’.g}.z;. 1H 20% WW(W>