Civil Revision No. 4716 of 2008 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 4716 of 2008 Date of Decision: 23.12.2008 Vishan Lal …Petitioner Versus Ghanshyam Dass ... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) In the present case, one Ghanshyam Dass filed eviction petition against the petitioner-tenant on 26.10.2005. On 7.6.2006, an application was filed under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC by the tenant that along with Ghanshyam Dass, legal representatives of Sohan Lal be impleaded as landlord as Ghanshyam Dass has sold the property to Sohan Lal. The tenant cannot choose the landlord and cannot file an application that instead of original landlord another person be impleaded as tenant. It is for the landlord to prove the relationship of landlord and tenant. Therefore, this application is misconceived. The parting note given by learned Rent Controller that the parties shall be at liberty to prove the relationship of landlord and tenant during the course of trial, Civil Revision No. 4716 of 2008 2 call for no interference. Hence, there is no merit in the present revision petition and the same is dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge December 23, 2008 “DK”