THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION Nos. 25795, 25805, 25806, 25807, 25810, 25822, 25824, 25825 and 25827 OF 2011 Dated: 15.09.2011 WRIT PETITION No. 25795 OF 2011 Between: Sri Lakshmi Poultry Complex ..... PETITIONER AND The A.P.Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd and 2 others ..... RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION No. 25805 OF 2011 Between: K.P.R.Rice Mills ..... PETITIONER AND The A.P.Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd and 2 others ..... RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION No. 25806 OF 2011 Between: K.P.R.Fertilizers ..... PETITIONER AND The A.P.Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd and 2 others ..... RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION No. 25807 OF 2011 Between: Sri Venkateswara Poultry Complex ..... PETITIONER AND The A.P.Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd and 2 others ..... RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION No. 25810 OF 2011 Between: K.P.R.Rice Mills ..... PETITIONER AND The A.P.Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd and 2 others ..... RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION No. 25822 OF 2011 Between: M/s. Aruna Poultry Complex ..... PETITIONER AND The A.P.Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd and 2 others ..... RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION No. 25824 OF 2011 Between: Jagadamba Rice Mill ..... PETITIONER AND The A.P.Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd and 2 others ..... RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION No. 25825 OF 2011 Between: Sri Lakshmi Poultry Complex ..... PETITIONER AND The A.P.Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd and 2 others ..... RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION No. 25827 OF 2011 Between: Sri Lakshmi Poultry Complex ..... PETITIONER AND The A.P.Eastern Power Distribution Co. Ltd and 2 others ..... RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION Nos. 25795, 25805, 25806, 25807, 25810, 25822, 25824, 25825 and 25827 OF 2011 COMMON ORDER : All these writ petitions are filed seeking a mandamus declaring the orders dated 05.06.2010, 30.08.2011 and 07.09.2011 passed by the respondents levying Fuel Surcharge Adjustment for the financial year 2008-2009, is arbitrary and illegal. When the matter is taken up for consideration, it is brought to my notice by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in identical circumstances, this Court allowed Writ Petition No.18212 of 2010 and batch by a common order dated 29.07.2011. The learned counsel for the respondents did not dispute the fact that the issue involved in these writ petitions are squarely covered by the common order in the above said batch of writ petitions. Accordingly, following the orders dated 29.07.2011 in W.P.No.18212 of 2010 and batch the impugned orders are set aside and all the Writ Petitions are allowed. No costs. ​ ____________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 15.09.2011 Ivd