THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.802 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner approached this Court by filing W.P.No.6042 of 2006, challenging a Memo, dated 20.02.2006, in relation to her absorption against an aided post. The writ petition was disposed of, through order, dated 11.06.2008, directing that the respondents shall consider the feasibility of subjecting the petitioner to verification and scrutiny by a committee and to extend the benefit of regularisation in accordance with the relevant provisions of law. This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents did not implement the said directions. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for School Education. The direction issued by this Court was not specific or positive as to the regularisation of the petitioner and it is only to the effect that the respondents shall consider the feasibility of subjecting the petitioner to verification and scrutiny by a committee. On examination of the matter, the third respondent issued proceedings, dated 03.06.2009, stating that it is not possible to extend the benefit of retrospective regularisation of the petitioner. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the said communication, she has to work out her remedies separately. Hence, the contempt case is closed. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:28.08.2009 kdl