IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.368 of 2009 MD.KASHIM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 06 24.06.2009 This Cr. Revision is directed against the judgment dated 10.12.2008 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Cr. Appeal no. 71 of 2006. It appears that the petitioner was convicted under Sections 25(1-b) a and 26(i) of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo R.I. for three years and two years respectively. He was also imposed a fine of Rs. 3000/- and 2000/- respectively with default clause. Petitioner filed appeal vide Cr. Appeal no. 71 of 2006. The learned lower Appellate Court by a well reasoned judgment while maintaining the conviction reduced the punishment. The petitioner was directed to serve sentence under Section 25(1-b)a for a period of one and half years instead of three years and a period of six months instead of two years under Section 26(i) of the Arms Act. The imposition of fine with default clause was/ were not altered. In paragraph no.32 of the judgment, the learned lower appellate court observed as under: “In view of above discussion and consideration I find that the learned court has rightly passed the impugned judgment of conviction under above sections of the Arms Act and I find no force in the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant and I find no perversity and illegality in the impugned judgment of conviction passed by the learned court below and accordingly the judgment of conviction does not warrant interference by this court.” This court after hearing the learned counsel and going - 2 - through the record does not find any perversity or illegality in the judgment meriting interference. The application is accordingly rejected. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)