IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1610 of 2006 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar Bhagat , son of Shri Bhagwan Prasad Bhagat, resident of village and Police Station - Kadwa, District - Katihar .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Collector, Katihar 3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Barsoi, Katihar 4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Katihar 5. Smt. Sanjhali Manjhiyain, wife of Shri Nattu Tudu, resident of village and Police Station - Kadwa, district - Katihar .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeeva Roy Mr. Shailendra Kr.Singh I For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Aag3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 8 01-05-2013 Sri Rajeev Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that since the present writ petition pertains to a dispute under Section 48E of the B.T. Act, 1885, and Tribunal for adjudicating such dispute has already been constituted and functioning, this case may be transferred to the Tribunal. This submission was made in presence of learned A.C. to Principal Additional Advocate General. Though, the present writ petition was filed in the year 2006, till date, no order has been passed for issuance of notice to private respondent. In view of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as in view of provision contained in Section 15 Patna High Court CWJC No.1610 of 2006 (8) dt.01-05-2013 2/2 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009, the Registry is directed to transmit the record of the case to the Tribunal forthwith. Praful/- (Rakesh Kumar, J)