1008wp2084.11.odt 1 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2084 of 2011. Rammanohar D.Sharma .vs.. Dr.Radhakisan G.Rathi and ors. ............................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................... Mr. Kavimandan Adv. h/f Mr.R.L.Khapre, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.S.V.Sirpurkar, Adv. for Res.1 to 5. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : 10th August, 2011. 1. The above petition takes exception to the order dated 18/01/2011 passed by the learned District Judge, Buldana, by which order the application filed by respondents no.1 to 5 herein for being joined them as plaintiffs to the Reg.Civil Suit No.1 of 2008 came to be allowed. The said suit was originally filed by four trustees. The said suit was filed for recovery of possession of the trust poperty from the defendants. During the pendency of the suit, out of the four trustees, who were arrayed as plaintiffs, three died. Thereafter, the elections took place pursuant to which change reports bearing No.436 of 2010 and 475 of 2010 came to be filed by the present respondents which came to be allowed by the order dated 9/3/2010 passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner. Though the order passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner is under challenge before the Joint Charity Commissioner, it is on the basis of their 1008wp2084.11.odt 2 elections as trustees, the respondent nos.1 to 5 herein had filed an application for being joined them as plaintiffs to the said suit. 2. Considering the said aspect, the learned District Judge allowed the said application. In my view, the reasons mentioned by the learned District Judge whilst allowing the said application, considering the aforesaid conspectus of facts cannot be faulted with. No case for interference is made out. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE chute