THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.23680 of 1998 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed challenging the validity of the order dated 30-01-1997 passed by the Authority under Section 50 of Andhra Pradesh Shops & Establishment Act, 1988 and the order of the appellate authority dated 23-07-1998 passed in proceedings No.N.Dis.F/3379/98 returning the appeal on the ground that it was filed after the period of limitation is over. By the order dated 30-01-1997 the Authority under Section 50 of the Andhra Pradesh Shops & Establishment Act, 1988 has ordered payment of certain amounts in favour of the second respondent, which he has claimed by way of an application filed under Section 50 of Rule 23 of Andhra Pradesh Shops & Establishment Act, 1988 towards the service compensation, leave with wages, due wages and bonus etc. This Court by order dated 31-03-2009 granted two weeks time for payment of batta for the second respondent. On the ground that in spite of the said order, no steps have been taken for payment of batta, this Court, by order dated 21-04-2009, dismissed the Writ Petition for non- prosecution, so far as second respondent is concerned. Though it is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order was passed by the Authority under Section 50 of Andhra Pradesh Shops & Establishment Act, 1988 without giving proper opportunity and the same is an ex parte order, but, as much as the Writ Petition was already dismissed so far as the second respondent is concerned, the petitioner is not entitled for any relief. In spite of the fact that this Court dismissed the Writ Petition, so far as the second respondent is concerned, no steps have been taken thereafter. In view of the dismissal of the Writ Petition as against the second respondent by order dated 21-04-2009, the petitioner is not entitled for any other relief in the Writ Petition. Any order to be passed in the Writ Petition will effect the rights of the second respondent, against whom the Writ Petition was already dismissed by order dated 21-04-2009. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J. 04th June, 2009. skmr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 23680 of 1998 Between: G.Laxminarayana S/o Ramalingam Pathawada, Huzurabad, KarimnagarDistrict. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 TheAuthority Under Section 50 of A.P.Shops and Establishment Act of Labour Office, Karimnagar. 2 K.C.Jayadevappa S/o Channabasappa R/o Kothapally Post, Bornapally Mandal, Huzurabad, Karimnagar District. 3 Munsif Magistrate, Huzurabad, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction especially one in the Nature of Mandamus:- (i)declaring the impugned order No.N.Dis.O.F./3379/98 dt:23.7.98 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary and set aside the same. (ii) direct the 1st respondent to restore the APSE Case No.3 of 1996 to file duly setting aside the ex parte order dt:31.1.97 in APSE Case.No.3/96. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.VASUDEVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following :