IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 5974 of 2008. [O&M] Date of Decision: 11th August, 2009. Vijay Pal & Another Petitioners through Mr. Jagjeet Beniwal,Advocate Versus Suraj Kaur & Ors. Respondents through Mr. Harsh Kinra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) This Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 05.09.2008 passed by the learned District Judge, Bhiwani, whereby the appeal preferred by the respondent – defendants has been allowed and after setting aside the order dated 03.01.2008 passed by the Additional Civil Judge [Senior Division], Bhiwani, the petitioner- plaintiff's application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC, has been dismissed. The petitioner – plaintiffs are claiming themselves to be joint-owners in possession of the suit property. It appears that the controversy pertains to 1/4th share which was owned by respondent No.1 who is stated to have suffered a consent decree in favour of respondent No. 2 – her daughter. The trial Court restrained the respondent – defendants from alienating the property in dispute, against which their appeal has since been allowed by the learned District Judge. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of controversy as also to avoid the multiplicity of litigation, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction that respondent No. 2 shall not alienate the suit property except with the prior permission of the trial Court with a further condition that the prospective buyer shall also be produced before the trial Court to give an undertaking to abide by the civil court's decision. It also appears desirable that the civil suit is decided expeditiously by granting limited opportunities to the parties, i.e., not more than three or four opportunities to each of them to lead their respective evidence. Disposed of. Dasti. August 11, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE