(1) WP 1680.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1680 OF 2011 Jijabai w/o. Nana Pagore PETITIONER VERSUS Rajendrakumar S/o. Madanlal Kala and ors. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. Balaji Shinde, Advocate with Mr. V.P. Latange, Advocate for the Petitioner. ..... CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 10TH MARCH, 2011 ORAL ORDER:- 1. Petitioner moved application for rejection of application under Order 39 Rule 2-A of Code of Civil Procedure on the ground that said proceeding needed separate registration. Trial Court had rejected that prayer. 2. Shri Latange contends that the proceedings needed to be tried as an independent proceedings and separate enquiry therefore needs to be conducted. According to him, therefore, separate registration is necessary and he is relying upon judgment of this (2) WP 1680.2011 Court in the matter of Rampyaribai Wd/o Sukhdeo Daga and ors. Vs. Niladevi wd/o Narayandas Jakhotiya reported at 2007 B.C.I. Page 83, particularly paragraph 7 to substantiate his contention. Learned counsel is however not in a position to show that any prejudice is caused to the petitioner by impugned order at this stage. 3. It is apparent that trial Court is aware of the procedure to be followed and there is nothing on record to show that the trial Court will not follow that procedure. If the petitioner finds that procedure is not being followed, he can always raise appropriate grievance. With that liberty to the petitioner, present Petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/- [B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.] arp