THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION No.3819 of 2009 ORDER : Heard Sri M.Radha Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.Ramesh, learned counsel representing the learned Public Prosecutor for the 1st respondent and Sri M.S.Ramachandra Rao, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. 2) A Division Bench of this Court decided C.M.A. No.872 of 2008 on 30.04.2009 granting an interim injunction in favour of the petitioner to be in force pending the suit while the trial Court is also directed to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible. The subject matter of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and the subject matter of Crime No.617 of 2009 of Kukatpally Police Station, Cyberabad Police Station are one and the same. The 2nd respondent who is the manager of the Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation gave the report to the police, on the basis of the delivery of possession of the land in question to the Corporation under a panchanama dated 13.10.2008, for protection, which police protection was also granted earlier. Obviously, the 2nd respondent was unaware of the judgment of this Court in C.M.A. No.872 of 2008 and if the petitioner was acting under the protection of the interim injunction granted in his favour in respect of the subject land, he cannot be accused of committing any offences punishable under law. 3) It is another matter that O.S. No.863 of 2007 on the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rangareddy District between the petitioner and the Mandal Revenue Officer, Balanagar concerning the subject property is still pending and may be ultimately decided for or against the petitioner. Either the Government or the Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation may become entitled to act in respect of the subject property in case of their success in that suit, but in the meanwhile initiation of any criminal proceedings, so long as the interim injunction in favour of the appellant granted in C.M.A. No.872 of 2008 on the file of this Court is in force, will be misconceived. 4) Hence, the further proceedings in Crime No.617 of 2009 on the file Kukatpally Police Station (Sho-C1) Cyberabad are quashed and the Criminal Petition is allowed accordingly. __________________ G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J August 26, 2009. KSH