IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6252 of 2011 Date of Decision: 13.10.2011 *** Lokesh Kumar & Anr. .. Petitioners VS. Chander Mohan .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR, Present:- Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The petitioners are aggrieved with order dated 8.6.2010 by dint of which the appellate Court below, in a pending appeal filed by respondent-tenant against the order of his eviction, disposed of the application filed by the petitioner claiming arrears of rent and mesne profits @ 10,000/- per month, by directing the respondent to pay the arrears of rent @ Rs.400/- per month. Heard. It is apparent from the perusal of record that the learned Rent Controller while ordering for eviction of the respondent-tenant, held the rent of the disputed property as Rs.400/- per month, as claimed by the petitioner- landlord. The impugned order has only been passed in the pending appeal and the grant of mesne profits etc. and its quantum, as claimed by the petitioners, would depend upon the fate of the appeal. At this juncture, the appellate Court below has rightly directed the respondent to pay the arrears of rent, at the rate, which were claimed by the petitioners at the time of filing of the eviction petition. There is no illegality or ambiguity in the impugned order. Dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) October 13,2011 JUDGE Jiten