^^ ^AHC-78 3H^T ^T RT^icfi ^^T 3?l^?l^)WF r^ ./"- •"> ,^.-;-i.::y!-' ^^ WNCtF SfeNI^ T5? ^t^t<y<<4, %>t»i-M<i<o, ftiE<rtl^1< ^-.^^^t.^..^.^s 3ff^T <l?i{'°R (13?ft33^) I^TW^f^^l^ HIGH COURT OF CHHAtTISGARH A1LBU.ASPUR Coram: Hon'ble Shri Hon'ble Shri Ohirendra Mishra and ^ilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, JJ. Arbitration ADDdal No. 20 of %08 APPELLANT Verisus RESPONDENT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 39 01 Appearance: Shri V.V.S.Murthy, Senior Advocate| the appellant. Shri A.KPrasad, counse? forthe res^ondent, ORAL (Passed on The fottowing orat order ofth' Mishra, J. •wiferahWRff -^ fe%t -(f^?n ^ 3Tfip»sniRi Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited, through its General Manager, Sector 1 Bhilai Nagar, District: Durg (C.G.) M/s. D.B. Rathore & Company, Post Office : Datli Rajhara, District Durg (C.G.) T11EARBITBATIONACT.1940 with Shri Vivek Verma, counsel for RDER >7.02.2009) Court was passed by Dhirendra ^t->t%%'«^^i;<—.'?y.^s •-•3;S. an^T^T ^nieft ^M 3??^[ '5CTNF '3T^^I^I<^; ^^^F<o^fa^ HWCTt ShNIW S^..&.^.M^.AO... "^IOO^ 31^ 4-44> (13^^^) ^wiw^ifei ^n^? ^?P'^411;T "W^Jf ^f fe^ iRt^K '^aiRRSTf^l This appeal under Sectior^ (henceforth the Act, 1940') is December, 2007 passed in Civil learned District Judge, Durg has 14 read with Section 17 ofthe ActJ basis ofaward ofthe arbitrator in fa^l 2. Shri V.V.S.Murthy, learned appetlant fairly submits that the ins^ Act, 1940 is not maintainable as tt| orders mentioned in Section 39 (1) 3. In view of the above submis^ for the appellant, the instant appeal dir^cted albwed Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge inslant 39 of the ArbitFation Act, 1940 against the order dated 19th tSuit No. 10-A/2004 whereby the the applicatton under Section 1940 and passed a decree on tha l^our ofthe respondents. penior Advocate appearing for the appeal under S^tion 39 ofthe is not directed against any of the |)to(v9oftheAct,1940. lion of the learned Senior Advooate |s dismissed as not maintaiRable. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge