HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 974 of 2006 (MS) Sunil Mishra s/o Sri N.C. Mishra R/o Ashma Lodge 4 No. 7, Mallital, Nainital …… Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary Higher Education, Dehradun 2. Uttaranchal Technical University, 6 Mahant Laxman Dass Road through its Vice-Chancellor …Respondents Sri B.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the petitioner Standing Counsel for the respondents. Dated: 27.7.2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Sri B.P. Nautiyal counsel for the petitioner and Standing Counsel for the respondents. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to proceed for the counselling in accordance with the policy framed by the respondent no. 2. According to the petitioner he appeared in the entrance test of M.C.A. in the year 2006-07 but after counselling he could not find place in State quota and was directed to appear in the counselling of All India quota. The counsel for the petitioner has submitted that counselling for All India quota has not been done as yet. In view of the above the writ petition is premature at this stage. However, respondent no. 2 is directed to proceed for counselling in accordance with the direction issued by AICTE. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Dated: 27.7.2006 Rajesh Tandon, J. *Dhyani