IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39941 of 2011 Md. Nanhak Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 30.11.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 28.01.2011 in a case registered for the offence under Sections 363, 364(A) and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of abducting the minor son of the informant Vinod Kumar. The victim went in the company of one Md. Munna who was salesman of Vinod Kumar. The statement has been made in paragraph nos. 8 and 9 of the petition that the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-I, Ara, has committed error of record in impugned order that the petitioner was salesman of Vinod Kumar and named in the F.I.R. and in paragraph no. 43 of the case diary confessional statement of the petitioner has been recorded whereas in paragraph no. 43 of the case diary confessional statement of Md. Munna is recorded. 2 The statement has been made in paragraph no. 13 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, F. T. C. Ist, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Sessions Trial No. 5780 of 2011 arising out of Bihiya P.S. Case No. 25 of 2011. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)