IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI THURSDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2009 / 8TH SRAVANA 1931 LA.App..No. 829 of 2009() ------------------------- LAR.68/2007 of SUB COURT, KASARAGOD .................... APPELLANT: RESPONDENT ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA (THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), KASARAGOD) REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR KASARAGOD. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSTP, PWD, OPPOSITE MILITARY HOSPITAL, KANNUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. LATHA T.THANKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS ------------------------ 1. PADMAVATHY AMMA, W/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, KOTTARUVAM, CHEMNAD VILLAGE, P.O.PARAVANADUKKAM. 2. GURUDATHAN, S/O.PADMAVATHY AMMA AND KRISHNAN NAIR, KOTTARUVAM, CHEMNAD VILLAGE, P.O.PARAVANADUKKAM. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.No.829 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 30th day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. We have by judgment in L.A.A. No.830/2009 approved enhancement at more or less the same rate given to the properties in the same village acquired for the same purpose, but pursuant to a subsequent notification. For the reasons stated in that judgment, the impugned judgment also can be approved. It is seen that taking into account the difference between dates of Section 4(1) notification, only lesser amount is awarded under the judgment impugned in this case. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE dpk