CWP No.13388 of 2007.doc - 1 – HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.13388 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.01.2011 **** Nachhattar Singh Sehmbey . . . . Petitioners VS. Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority & Anr. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. BR Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. RK Sharma, Advocate for the respondents **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). Since the relief sought in this writ petition has been denied to the petitioner on the basis of orders dated 01.01.1997 & 06.12.2001 (Annexure R1/1 and R1/3) which have been statedly disclosed to him by way of a miscellaneous application only, learned counsel for the petitioner appears to be right in contending that the petitioner be permitted to impugn the same before the appropriate forum. CWP No.13388 of 2007.doc - 2 – (2). As prayed for, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to impugn the above-stated orders passed by respondent No.2 before an appropriate forum, if so advised. (3). Suffice it to observe that the petitioner while challenging the above-stated orders may also impugn the orders assailed in the present petition, if so required. (4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 28.01.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge