t' 1^1 In the Hon'ble Hisfa CourtDfJudicature ofChhattisffarh at BUaspur fC.G.) W.P.NO. s^a=^ 2006 Petitioner Respondents l^'^^'.^ ^:^i<^y '.••'fLdS^}y. y» ^ Ramesh Kumar Sahu, aged 47 years, / Son of Shri Chattur Singh Sahu, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Girls Primary School, Hanoda, R/o Villagge Kolihapuri, Tahsil & District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS -1. The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh, / Through - The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department Ministry, D.K..S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. District Education Officer, Durg ./' ^y^ ^^ ^•' •W 3. Block Education Officer,r> U^ District Qyw^ , "h (C.G.) <t^ s^ Writ Petition Under Articles 226/227 of The Constitution Qflndia for the issuance of WR[T in the nature ofMANDAMUS certiorw^ Prohibttion_^ani_for other suitable writ or writs, order or orders. direction or directions. The petitioner most respectfally fumishes the particulars ofthe writ petition as under: - HI6H COURT OF CHHATTESeARH AT BILASPUR Petitioner '. P, (s) No, 5070of 2006 Ramesh faimar Sahu Versus The State Sovernment of Chhattisgarh &others Sjrgle Bench: Hon'bfe Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Shri AJay Shrivastava, Advocote for the Petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. £ovt.Advocate for the respondents/State. O R t)^ R (18th September, 2006) Leeimed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that while working as Assistant Teacher, the petitioner has gone on training to improve his qualifications on his own expenses ond acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificate in the year 1992 from the Board of Higher Secondary Education, AAadhya Pradesh, Bhopal. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two adveince increments in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-C6 96). This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, burg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion ttiat the teachers, who had obtained B.T.I. ^r Exawination Certificate on his own expenses, are covered by the circular dated 24.12.98 (Annexure P/2) issued by the State Sovernment of AAadhya Pradesh 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the facts and question of law involved in the present case are squarely covered by decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. AAunicipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents fsirly concedes and agrees wi-rti the averment made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 4. Accordin9ly, the writ petition is attowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, bur9 and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.T.I. Examination Ceri'ificate on his own expenses or not. No order css to costs. saBSI1^ Thakur