IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARAYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-27312 of 2011 Date of Decision: 22.11.2011 Manjeet ….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ….Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI Present: Mr. Surinder Singh Duhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana *** M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition has become infructuous and be dismissed as such. Dismissed as having become infructuous. 22.11.2011 (M.M.S. Bedi) vcgarg JUDGE - subject to an additional condition that petitioners will not commit the same offence of which they are accused of and they will not make any attempt to tamper with the evidence. the fact that he has been in judicial custody with effect from 10.06.2009, it is ordered that in case Meena Rani, complainant is not examined within a period of next five months, it will be open to the petitioner to approach this Court for the grant of regular bail. Prosecution is directed to make earnest endeavour to produce Meena Rani in the Court within above Crl. Misc. No.M-14893 of 2010 -2- mentioned period. Disposed of. Taking into facts and circumstances of the case that they are not involved in any other case and coupled with the facts and circumstances of their co- accused having been granted bail, they can be released on bail. The petition is allowed. Petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court, subject to an additional condition that petitioners will not commit the same offence of which they are accused of and they will not make any attempt to tamper with the evidence. -