IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 12TH MAY 2009 / 22ND VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 13589 of 2009(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. BINDU K.R., W/O. UNNIKRISHNAN, NEDILAZHIKOM, VENDAR, PUTHOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. R. BINDU, W/O. GOPAKUMAR, GANGA SADANAM, VENDAR, PUTHOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. SREEKALA C.R., W/O. PONNAPPAN PILLAI, PONNALAYAM, VENDAR, PUTHOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DIST. 4. SHYLAJA, W/O. GOVINDA PILLAI, KOCHU VEEDU, VENDAR, PUTHOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CIVIL LINES, COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM. 2. THE TAHSILDAR/ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KOTTARAKKARA. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PUTHOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM. BY GP SRI.NANDAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).13589/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 12th day of May, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioners challenge Ext.P4 order issued by the RDO requiring the removal of certain rubber trees planted in their property. I am not inclined to consider the contentions of the petitioners on merits at this stage. It is open to the petitioners to move the RDO for revocation of Ext.P4. 2. I heard learned Government Pleader also. I am of the view that Ext.P4 need only be treated as a show cause notice. If the petitioners file an objection against Ext.P4, RDO shall consider the same and pass a reasoned order within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of such objection. Writ petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs