an^r'?it "fi^NT ^rar'ati^i 9>*iiei> '3's? -^l<ll<'t<(, eiTil'M'is, faniyy wcni ti»*««»» "Wl 200 sn^na^ ('^f^1') ^WISK til^a ^n^w (Sinole Bench: Hon'blfe^Mr. Justice Dhirendra Mishro) W.F.(0 JNo (Petition U/A 226 ofl PE7ITIONER Kripal bas,| years. R/o pendr-o Road Vs RESPONDENTS 1. State o-fl &epcrtnn| the Constitution of India) S/o Lachchireim, a9ed about 83 Ward No.4, Pendra Road, Tahsii &istrict Bilaspur (CS) Chhattisgarh.Through! Secretary, snt of Seneral Administration, D.K.S. Btfawan. Mantralaya, Rcipur' (C©) -^ F>.:^A—:^A. (-. U1STPICT 3. Superint) (CS) 4. Jail 5uF|erintendent, Central Jail, Bilaspur (C6) Present: **—<A-:.. Al-...:- AJ.—^A-^<- *1—^ fvu^. nnju nnuju, /^uyu^uie iu'r ine, p AAr. Arun Sao. 6ovt. Advocate for thi 08.10.2009 Heard. The petitioner has filed this resoondent authorities to aive the p4l Lok Nayak Jaiprakash Narayan (Mi^a/D Nirudh Vvd<t0 Samman Nidhi Niyar under the Internal Security Act. 197) Learned counsel for the oe'l entitled to claim Samman Nidhi as relevant time, however,his applicQti6li.in *iifct4-) ^iNiifl ifft^t <r"itsi< ^aflwiini^r te.5802/2009 A--:-A..-—>.-n:l-->^.—//*/*\ ncigisTraTe, eiiaspur \^Vj ndent of Police, District Bitaspur Ai;Ai;<»«»— iiiiur«£.i-. State. ((etition and proyed for a direction to the 4titioner benefit of Samman Nidhi as oer >.I.R. Rcunetik Ya Samajik Karano Se :>h. 2008 as the oetitioner was detained ^itioner' submits that 1+ie petitioner is he wae o!so detained under MISG at the i(l.in this!re9ard has been rejected by the aitl-flfl ^atoli);'lll<-i1lW-li<;'IM—FS/95—11 /2008—1 ,00,000. -..•^Nt.....^-^--:^fc;-^i»^-«t^t .^. .^yis^. ,..">;SC~%. •-^^f!^, ^ """•""•«i :*>. ?. aii^r qn Ri'ii* ^an<*ii^i ssll1^ ^ ^S^ '^l'lll^^ ©Tll'M'ie,(qcll-My 'MKV ^WV ?«1^<W^fl ofl^T -Z-- respondent No.2 vide order dated submits that the petitioner is n|i however. the petitioner prays for respondent No.2 for redressal of No.2 may be directed to decide ti^< verification from the records and petitioner. Mr. Sso. learned Sovernmenl the Detitioner files fresh aDOlicatidn period of ten dcys from today for petition. it shalt be consider'ed and tvith low within a further Deriod of Accordingiy. the instant petij petitioner to file fresh aoDtication respondent No.2. within ten days fl made, the respondent No.2 is dired of the petitioner in accordance withj the date of receipt of the represenl Certified coov os t>er rules. •twtail'f tiwdl 4fs^ <Fnt;]< ^srfw sn^?F P8.2.2009 of Annexune P-4. She further >t pressing this petition at this stage. |berty to file fresh cpplication before the lis qrievance and in turn, the respondent |e application of the petitioner after due tocuments that may be submitted by the Advocate for the State submits that if alona with relevant documents within a jr'edressal of his grievances raised in this tlecidsd by respondent No.2 in accordance weeks. rton is disposed of with a dir'ection to the ilong with retevant documents befor-e the tom today. On such representation being jed to consider and decide the application lare within q period of three weeks fr-om lation. Sd/- Dhirendra Misiira Judge ;L-- i.mistegifrana'TRRTiw-'i'i'iw—FS/95—i 1 /2B08—1,00,