IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1006 of 2011 BAIDNATH YADAV @ BAIDYANATH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dhanha P.S. Case No. 36 of 1995 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 65 of 1998 registered under sections-396, 353, 307, 364, 436/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section-27 of the Arms Act. Although the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. but contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that having more or less similar allegation, almost all the accused persons of this case have already granted privilege of bail whereas the petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 31.05.2006 but uptill now, the trial of the petitioner has not been concluded. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, particularly keeping in mind that having similar allegation several accused persons are enjoying privilege of bail, the petitioner, namely, Baidnath Yadav @ Baidyanath Yadav is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Dhanha P.S. Case No. 36 of 1995 - 2 - corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 65 of 1998 to the satisfaction of Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Bagaha, West Champaran. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)