IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5821 of 2011 KALI NATH RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 13.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is named in the FIR with allegation that he alongwith several other accused entered the shop of the informant and took out Rs 30,000/- from cash box on the point of fire-arm and subsequently, they also snatched golden chain from the informant’s daughter. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no such occurrence has ever taken place and as a matter of fact, the present case has been lodged by the informant on account of political rivalry. It is also contended by him that the informant was a seller of fertilizer and he was in habit of charging high prices from the farmers which were protested by the petitioner and others and that is the reason, the informant has lodged this case. Considering the facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, particularly this aspect of the matter that one co-accused, namely, Nanhe Yadav has already been granted privilege of bail by learned court below itself, let the petitioner, namely, Kali Nath Ram be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) 2 with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Darauli P.S. Case No. 131 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)