1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.255 OF 1996 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.305 OF 1996 Bennett Coleman and Co.Ltd. ..Petitioner. V/s. Mumbai Mazdoor Sabha & Ors. ..Respondents. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : MARCH 20, 2006. DATE : MARCH 20, 2006. DATE : MARCH 20, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Issue fresh notice returnable on 17th April, 2006. 2. In addition, petitioner to serve the respondent(s) by advocate’s notice either personally and/or by speed post and/or by courier and/or by RPAD and/or by email and/or by fax and file affidavit of service before the returnable date failing which petitions to stand dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. Office note also indicates that Anil Kumar Advocate appeared for petitioner but has not filed Vakalatnama. The said advocate shall file vakalatnama within two weeks from today, failing 2 which office to issue show cause notice as to why appropriate action should not be taken against him. Notice made returnable after 3 weeks from today.