IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 14872 of 2008. Decided on: 20.6.2011. Shubhi Lath ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others ..….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to the re- engagement of the petitioner. 2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructous, so also the pending application(s), if any. June 20, 2011. (Rajiv Sharma) (hl) Judge 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.