IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2008 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 12090 of 2008(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ BHARTI INFRATEL LTD. FORMERLY KNOWN AS BHARTI TELE-VENTURES LIMITED, S.L.AVENUE, N.H.BYPASS, KUNDANNUR, KOCHI REPRESENTED BY ITS HEAD-LEGAL, SRI.P.JAYABAL MENON. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. CHANGAROTH GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KADIYANGAD P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT 673 525, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE CHANGAROTH GRAMA PANCHAYAT COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, CHANGAROTH, KADIYANGAD P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, J. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W.P.(C).No.12090/2008-L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 11th day of April, 2008 J U D G M E N T Even though respondents have been served notice by special messenger, they have not turned up. The averments in the writ petition are established by the non traverse. Considering the submissions addressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner at the bar, I am of the view that the petitioner is entitled for reliefs. Accordingly, Exts.P3 and P5 are quashed and the respondents in the writ petition are directed to permit the petitioner to carry out the construction of the telecommunication tower as per Ext.P1 building permit issued in their favour without insisting on production of any no objection certificate from the Pollution Control Board and the Atomic Energy Commission. The writ petition is disposed of as above. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, Judge ms