IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27001 of 2009 DEEPAK KUMAR @ DEEPAK @ BABLOO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR WITH Cr.Misc. No.29347 of 2009 MOHAMMAD MUNNA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 18.08.2009 Heard both sides. Both the matters arise of the same occurrence giving rise to Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 284 of 2009 instituted under Sections 395/412 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the F.I.R. the informant was intercepted by few miscreants in the lane near the temple and at the gun point he was looted watch including mobile, cash etc. Another person coming through that lane was also robbed of his belongings. Alarm was raised, which attracted the patrolling party and a chase was offered whereafter, the petitioner Mohammad Munna and co-accused Prahlad were arrested. Petitioner Deepak Kumar is named in the F.I.R. as the informant claimed his identification. It appears from the possession of petitioner Mohammad Munna certain looted articles were also recovered. 2 Submission made before this Court is that seizure effect from possession of Mohammad Munna was not prepared in his presence and was got signed by him. So far petitioner Deepak is concerned, it is contended that he has falsely been named in the F.I.R. Learned Sessions Judge on consideration of the material on record has found that the occurrence has been supported and corroborated by other witnesses. The informant in his further statement claims identification of the petitioners. He has also disclosed the source of identification. Looking to the entire aspects of the matter this Court is not persuaded to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioners. Prayer for bails made on their behalf are accordingly, rejected. If the trial of the case is not taken up within a year, petitioners shall have liberty to renew their prayer for bail. P.K. (K. K. Mandal, J.)