(x (W IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR C.G MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO.C23 ‘ O 2005 @ Being aggrieved bv the Judgement and award gassed by Cor‘h’r/nissbneryorksmen Comgensationl' .Ramur In claim case no 189/WCAct/2002/ Non Fetal dated 25 1 2005 m the case of Ru kant Sharma Versu Sushil Kumar & Another. givisian Bench Musc. ADDeal U/s. 2/of the Workmens Compensation Act 1923/ ) APPELLANT /CLAIMANT / Rupkant Sharma S/o Hrldaynath Sharma Aged about 34 years R/o Gudlyarl Shukrawan BaJar District Ralpur (C G ) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ,NON—APPELLANTS (1‘). Sushil Kumar, S/o. Madan Lal Bajaj, R/o. “f New Panchshil Nagar Raipur (C.G.) V kg aiéa to'rn/ (2) Natlodllnsrurance Company, Through En.“ vase“ 1:59 .249? W- f .....{43‘ ,.« “ranch ahal City Manager Branch Second 2 G E Floor Road Mobm Raipur (c G ) W“... u" §¢ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR \ M.A, No. 930/2005 APPELLANT Rupkant Sharma Versus Sushil Kumar and another RESPONDENTS SB:- HON’BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL;J 9W (11—3—2011) l. The matter is called twice. Even then none appears for the appellant. In the circumstances, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non—prosecution. Sdl- N. K. Agatwal Judge R