IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.621 of 2008 SHAMBHU PRASAD SON OF SRI GAYA LAL, VILLAGE LAUND, P.S. SIRDALA, DISTRICT NAWADA …….PETITIONER VERSUS 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.DIORECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 3.INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ( PULICE MUKHALAYA) BIHAR, PATNA. 4.DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MAGADH RANGE, GAYA. 5.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NAWADA, 6. DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAULI. 7.OFFICE INCHARGE, SIRDALA, 8.A.S.I. RAJAULI, 9. MAMTA DEVI, WIFE OF LATE BALIRAM PASWAN, VILLAGE RAJAULI, P.S. RAJAULI, DIST. NAWADA………respondents. ----------- 4 26.2.2009 In this writ application prayer of the petitioner is to direct investigation of Rajauli P.S. case No. 86 of 2008 in terms of the observation of the Supreme Court in the case of Joginder Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others, A.I.R. 1994 Supreme Court 1349. Mr. Indradeo Prasad appears on behalf of the petitioner. State is represented by Assistant Counsel to A.A. G-I. Mr. Pramod Kumar appears on behalf of respondent no.9. It is common ground that after investigation charge sheet has been submitted. In that view of the matter any direction for reinvestigation of the case is absolutely misconceived. According to the petitioner without any material charge sheet has been submitted and for that petitioner had filed Criminal Revision no. 230 of 2009 before this Court. As to whether the material collected during the course of investigation is sufficient to submit charge sheet shall be considered in the aforesaid criminal revision application and this writ application is not appropriate proceeding for that. - 2 - Writ application deserves to be dismissed. However dismissal of this writ petition shall not prejudice the petitioner in the said case. Application stands dismissed with the observation aforesaid. (Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, ACJ) Rahman/