H%@H QQURT QF CHH£TT§$$ARH AT B§LASPUR 3M5 Revkion RR. No.382512i39a Singie gerach: H9n’b§e $hri EEK: Ragsaiseb Deghmakh. é.- 0 APPHCAN? Ajay Sim 0f Rambahi’ik. Casie~SonL ageii 38 years, Thraugh his Agent wife namely $mt. Shakm’gaia Sam wife of Ajav: aged‘ about 35 years, re5ideni GT’ Amapafa Warc§, Shamtari, DistriGt-D’rxamtari, {c.G.) ‘JERrsUS ’i. Nanci Kumar, son 0f Raiamm Jangée, aged abeut 35 years, resident of Bamhha; Tehsii-Ayang, Distric‘t—Raimr (CG) MGN-&?PLE§ANT Nar Singh somof MLAgrawa! aged abau‘: 4O year’s, threugh Shfi Geyai Transport Mandh’, Ha$auti, feSident 0f Mai‘iéh Hasaud, District~Raipur (CG) ~ 3. Nai§enai §nsmance Co. Lid. GERoad, Krishna Ccmpiex, Ramm, Distfic’i-Rai’gur {6.8.} \ h) ghri Sans! Sam, caunseS for the apgiicant, OEAL ORDER (Pas3ed on 3Q-O3-2QO?} Heas'd era appi§ca€§on {Em condomijen 0f deiay in fmmg ‘iMs CWL‘ Revi3ion. 2. F0? the rea$orns memioned in tha awiica’iéon, i £3 aibwed and the deiay in fiEing miss (3M1 Revision i$ candongci. ’3. This Civii Rev sion is being fimaiiy diasosed 9f a‘s‘: ihe sxage ‘ o:r admission without mtice i9 ’{he non-amaiicants. é Heawi iinaiiy. 5. Brief facts are that ihe appiicant wiiered afeimanem ciisabiiity due to aii accitierat that accurred 031 14—05-2963. T.he appiicani has iii’ed Claim Case Ne}? cf 2G04 through hi5 agent-Wife iameiy Smi. Shakumaia 30m which was seitied m Liek .Adaiai cm i0~mn2CIC36. 'i'he Insurance Company aiepoaited iha amouni oi .QSE) Lak‘n befsre ihe i Ieamed Meier Accident Ciaima Tribmai. The appiicai‘ii/fiied an appiication fer paymeri’i of the amount depoeiieci by the immense Comoany on‘the giomd that in treatmeni of the husbaod io’t 0i exoendiiure had been incuiied by obiainirig loan which was required io be i'epaici. However, ’i‘ne Court whiie passing ihe impugned cider eateci 28—G3n2006 permitted the applicani 20 withdraw a sum of R3.25,QQQ!— oniy aed directed iha‘i ihe remaining amount of Rs2,50,0QQI- shaii be ¥ I \ ciepesiied 5M 5 years in fixed depesii. The immgneci Qm‘e; passed by the Ieamed Mom? Acciden‘i C%aim$ Tribunai, Ghammri <5 Habke i0 be sei— as‘ide‘ Shae the maéter was compfomisaed in Lek Ada£at and me 1 eppiicam has! disciosed a genuine requiremem of iheaamourat 0f zomgaensation paid by ihe lmurar upcn sewemen‘t awivaci at batween the games‘ in Lak Adaiat, the {eamed Meta; Accident Ciaims Tyibum% Gught i0 have directed the entii’e amount depesited as cempemsatmaw by é’me mswer to be paid m the appiicant. in the resuit, this Civii Revisian i$ aiiowed, The impugne<§ order dated 28433-2095 passed by the ieamed Meier Amidem CiaimS ribunai, Dhamtari in Ciaim Ca'se No.1? inf 2004 is sei—asside. The applicant shaii axe entitied to receive ihe eniire amount of compensatien deposited 5y me insurei thi'ough his Agent wiie Sm: Shakuntaia $0ni. i i i/Sdp eb Des“mukhv