[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.3219 OF 2008 Mrs.Dilshad Mainuddin Golandaz ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Imtiyaz Patel Advocate for Applicant Mr.K.V.Saste APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in CR No.107 of 2008 of Byculla Police Station, Mumbai. The said case is mainly under Sections 498-A and 306 r.w. 34 of IPC. 3. The complainant who is daughter in law of the applicant, has stated that from the next day of the marriage the applicant started torturing her saying that she had not got enough dowry. The complainant [-2-] has also stated that the applicant used to treat her with cruelty. The husband of the complainant i.e. son of the present applicant left the complainant at the house of her father without any reason. Complainant has also stated that the applicant along with her son threatened her that she should get Rs.2 lakhs from her father otherwise they would not take her back. In the complaint, it is also stated that the applicant and her son committed misappropriation of jewellery of the complainant and some cash. In view of the facts stated in the complaint, I do not find that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. Application is rejected. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]