Court No.2 Writ Petition No.266 (M/S) of 2002 State of Uttaranchal and others ……… Petitioners Versus Ajay Kumar Pandey and another ……… Respondents. …………………….. Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the award dated 16.03.2002 passed on the application under Section 33-C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947. A finding has been recorded by the Labour Court that the respondent No.1 had worked from 16.01.1998 to 25.04.1998 after considering the entire evidence led before him. After holding that the respondent No.1 had worked from 16.01.1998 to 25.04.1998 the Labour Court directed the petitioners to pay Rs.7699.23 as the wages for the work done during that period. The learned Standing Counsel could not show that the finding recorded by the Labour Court is perverse and could not have been recorded on the basis of evidence on record. Therefore, in my opinion, it is not a fit case to interfere with the order dated 16.03.2002 passed by the Labour Court impugned in the writ petition. The petition is devoid of merits and is dismissed. (P.C. Verma, J.) 23.09.2002 P.Singh