1 WP No.8036/10 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8036 of 2010 The Principal Progressive Education Society ... Petitioner versus Bar Council of India & ors. ... Respondents ... Mr. A.V. Anturkar i/b S.B.Deshmukh for the petitioner. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND N.D.DESHPANDE, JJ DATED : 11th October 2010 P.C. 1. On a motion made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, names of respondent nos.2 and 3 is permitted to be deleted. 2. The petitioner filed the petition challenging the communication dated 15th September 2010 from Bar Council of India. In first paragraph of that letter, though three years Law Course is referred to, from the fact that deficiency in non-law subject is pointed out, it appears that the entire communication relates to a Five Year Law course. The permission for running Five Year Law Course is not cancelled forthwith but time is given to the petitioner college to remove 2 WP No.8036/10 the deficiency and it is only on failure of the college to remove the deficiency that the permission ceases. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the 10 days time given for removing the deficiency is inadequate. If that is so, it was for the college to move the Bar Council and seek extension of time to remove the deficiency. For that purpose, writ petition cannot be entertained. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also submits that asking the college to engage full time teachers for non law subjects is impractical. In our opinion, if that is the grievance, it can also be pointed out by the college to the Bar Council while making the representation. Petition disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J) (N.D.DESHPANDE,J)