SSHGLE BENCH e.J^ ^^o^ In the Hon'ble Hiflh Court of Chhattishaarh at Bilaspur (C.G.I W.P.(S)No. °>^ 2010 Petitioners ... 1 'y 2. ^•f'^^S^ ^%i%^3. /T^^W' <y..^'^>"' y'' ^' .•••''' ^y'x Prcunod KumarVajpai, aged 37 yrs. S/o Shri Ramnarayan Vajpai, Head Master, Primary School Khertha Bazar Distt. Durg (C.G.). Rajkumar Diwan, Aged 41 years, S/oShri Prahalad Dhar Diwan, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Sanjari, Distt. Durg (C.G.). Upendra Kumar Yadu, aged 46 years son ofShri Damulal Yadu, Head Master, Govt. Prirriary School, Bhalu Konha, Block-Dondi Lohara, Distt.Durg(C.G.). Versus Respondents ^^ \. StateGovt. of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, Durg 3. Block Education Officer, Dondi Lohara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of writ of IVIandamus/direction or anv other aDDropriate writ. Petitioners are furnishing particulars of the writ petition as below:- 1. Particulars ofthe oetitioners. - As stated above, 2. Particulars ofthe respondents - As statedabove l<;;3r"l%, ^ 'S^t ^WW^, fS-^WW, [~^v\wy. ._^?^)rM,ry^Vr0. <(i*mr%*<T<s 3lA?I TCTT (tpf3^?) 311^1 ^I felhT wnaii^i'anw SBi Itan'ldeShrLUanLndraJBohanShritf 26-07-20i0 Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for 1h< Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer fol copy. Heard. Submission of learned counsel for tl in sen/ice, the petitioners have obtained B. and therefore, they are entitied to two advd the petitioner fiirther submits that in an BhardwaJ vs. Minfcyal Corporatton, Dui 2003) decided on 03-04-2006, this Court h, there is entiflement ofhvo advance increme Learned State counsel submits that before the concerned respondent authorit^ same shall be considered and decided in ai the order passed by this Court in identical c^ses. In view of the submission made disposed of. *i<ii<'i<ii-) *<iticf( ^ ft<A <r«i«{i< ^ sifiin <ii4s!i istava.J. petitionere. the State/respondents on advance ie pelitioners is that white continuing Ed. cerfficate at their own expenses, nce incremente. Learned counsel for identical case YasAwant Kumar g anaf anoffter flV.P. fSJ No.3977 <rf ad allowed the petition declaring that ^te. f the petitioners make representation for redressal of their grievance, the :cordance with law as also in view of hereinabove, the petition is finally Sd-/ Manmdra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ,i:tf^!C K^StV it?tTCT, (WiTiPfH-'-FS'l 47—2^010—1,00,000. :]W;