IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 16762 of 2005 BETWEEN: U.K. Narasimhulu, S/o U.K. Lakshmanna, R/o H.No.3-87, Upper Street, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District. ... PETITIONER AND The Revenue Divisional Officer, Adoni, Kurnool District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not allowing the petitioner to lift the Essential Commodities even after the completion of the period of suspension by his own proceedings Rc.M.1217/05 dt.14-03-2005 as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent to restore the authorization of the petitioner by permitting the petitioner for 3rd ward of Yemmiganur Town, Kurnool District to lift the stocks and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.V.RAGHU VEER Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: ORDER: Petitioner questions the impugned suspension order suspending his fair price shop authorization for a period of three months. 2. Learned Government Pleader submits that as the three months period is already over, no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J April 29, 2008 DSK