IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 21ST APRIL 2009 / 1ST VAISAKHA 1931 WP(C).No. 12067 of 2009(C) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- INDIRA, D/O.AMMU, VP 20/51, VIZHINJAM PANCHAYATH, VIZHINJAM WARD, VIZHINJAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER RESPONDENTS : ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. VIZHINJAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH OFFICE, VIZHINJAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. SISUPALAN, S/O.RAVINDRA PANICKER, HOTEL SAGARA BEACH RESORT, LIGHT HOUSE BEACH, VIZHINJAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. JAYAN, S/O.RAVINDRA PANICKER, HOTEL SAGARA BEACH RESORT, LIGHT HOUSE BEACH, VIZHINJAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. SHIBU, S/O.RAVINDRA PANICKER, HOTEL SAGARA BEACH RESORT, LIGHT HOUSE BEACH, VIZHINJAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.12067 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 21st day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner submits that she has filed Ext.P2 complaint before the 2nd respondent making allegations against respondents 3 to 5 in regard to certain construction works undertaken by them. In this writ petition, she complains that the 2nd respondent has not taken any action on Ext.P2. 2. Having regard to the aforesaid grievance, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P2, if such a complaint has been received, with notice to respondents 3 to 5, and pass orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg