1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATIOIN NO.5675 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1752 OF 2007 Tulsabai Ashruba Budhwant, Age: 37 years, Occ: Household, R/o. Adhalwadi, Post-Jatdevala, Tq. Pathardi, Dist.Ahmednagar and others. .Applicants Versus New India Assurance Company Ltd. having its head and registered office at New India Assurance Building, 87, M.G. Marg, Fort Mumbai, Divisional Office at Ahmednagar & Aurangabad Near Ashoka Hotel, Ahmednagar and another. .. Respondents CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : 17th JUNE, 2009. Mr. N.B. Narwade, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. S.L. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No. 1. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants and learned Counsel for respondent No. 1. 2 2. Present Civil Application is preferred by the original claimants for withdrawal of amount of Rs. 3,02,479/- deposited by the respondent in this Court. It is the case of the applicants that though as per order dated 22-04-2008 this Court allowed to withdraw a sum of Rs. 50,000/- to applicant No. 1 and sum of Rs. 20,000/- each to the applicant Nos. 6 and 7, they required some further amount to repay loan taken by them for performing marriage of their daughter Reshma and for the medical treatment of applicant No. 1. 3. It is to be noted that in Para. 6 and 7 of the present Civil Application, the applicants submitted that recently marriage of Reshma has been performed and heavy expenses has been incurred for the marriage of Reshma. But nowhere it is stated how much amount they spent. In similar way, nothing is stated in Para. 7 how much expenses incurred by them for medical treatment of applicant No. 1. On the other hand, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent vehemently opposed present Civil Application on the ground that previous order dated 22-04-2008 was passed by this Court after hearing both the sides. He further pointed out that as per order dated 22-04-2008 the applicant No. 1 is permitted to withdraw quarterly interest accrued on fixed deposit. Therefore, there is no substance in the present Civil Application. 4. It is correct that previous order dated 22-04-2008 was passed in 3 C.A. No. 3162/2008 after hearing both the sides. There is no liberty granted by this Court to applicants to move further application for withdrawal of additional amount as and when occasion arises. Not only that, nowhere it is explained in Para. 6 and 7 how much amount they spent on the marriage and medical treatment of applicant No. 1. In any case, applicant No. 1 is getting quarterly interest on the fixed deposit as per order dated 22-04-2008 passed by this Court in C.A. No. 3162/2008. Therefore, it is not possible to allow the applicants to withdraw any further amount. 5. Civil Application is dismissed. [ K.K. TATED, J.] sut/JUN09/ca5675.09