1 BA-115.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE - CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.115 OF 2011 Kum. Vanita Namdeo Karande .... Applicant Vs. Anna Jagannath Doltade & Anr. .... Respondents S/Shri G.A. Karmalkar i/b G.S. Hegde & Associates for the Applicant. Ms P.P. Shinde, APP, for the State. Shri H.G. Wakshe for the original complainant. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: APRIL 06, 2011 P.C: This is an application for cancellation of bail granted to the respondent after the respondent was in custody for 37 days in an offence of rape. The allegation is that the victim, who was just 14-years of age, had been raped by the respondent over a period of one year. On 29-10-2010 the victim complained of pain in the abdomen in the presence of her parents and therefore the parents came to know that she had conceived. The victim delivered a female child on 29-10-2010 itself. On 9-11-2010 a report was given. Before that, on 29-10-2010, the respondent executed registered documents transferring three lands in the name of the 2 BA-115.11 victim. The learned counsel for the applicant also points out that after bail was granted, the respondent has been threatening the prosecutrix and her family members and NCs have been registered and therefore the bail granted to the respondent should be cancelled. While there can be no doubt that forcible sexual intercourse with a minor is reprehensible, considering the facts narrated above, it cannot be said that the learned Additional Sessions Judge erred in admitting the respondent to bail after 37 days of his being in custody. It is not that the respondent is not going to face trial and eventually may be punished by the trial Court after considering the evidence. There is no ground to cancel the bail. The learned counsel for the respondent is present and he would advice the respondent to keep himself scrupulously away from the prosecutrix and her family members and till the trial is over. Should there be any breach, the learned trial Judge would obviously be entitled to take appropriate action. The application is, therefore, rejected. The learned trial Judge would consider expeditious disposal of the case. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)