IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 26TH OCTOBER 2010 / 4TH KARTHIKA 1932 OP (RC).No. 454 of 2010(O) -------------------------- RCP.156/2003 of PRL.M.C.,ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER/JUDGMENT DEBTOR --------------------- PREMALATHA PATNI, W/O.PATNI, PROPRIETRIX,AGED 59,M/S.JAIN TRADES AND AGENCIES, CONVENT ROAD, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.JAIJI ITTEN RESPONDENTS/DECREE HOLDER ---------------------------- K.S.CHANDRASEKHARA KAMMATH, S/O.LATE SRI.SADANANDA KAMMATH, AGED 55, KORATTIPARAMBIL HOUSE, CONVENT ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI- 35. THIS OP (RENT CONTROL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. ----------------------------------- O.P.(R.C) No.454 OF 2010 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Under challenge in this Original Petition submitted under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is Ext.P3 order passed by the Principal Munsiff of Ernakulam in execution of an order of eviction passed in R.C.P.No.156/2003 by the Rent Control Court, Ernakulam. Eventhough apparently attractive grounds have been raised and Mr.Jaiji Itten, the learned counsel for the petitioner addressed us on the basis of the grounds, we are of the view that in view of the proviso to Section 14 of Act 2 of 1965 the petitioner's remedy lies before the District Court and not before this Court. We dispose of the O.P. relegating the petitioner to that remedy. 2. In view of the above order, we direct the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam, to keep in abeyance all proceedings for delivery in E.P.No.116/2010 in R.C.P.No.156/2003 till 2.11.2010. Issue copy tomorrow itself. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) (P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE) ps