IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28817 of 2010 MINA KUMARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 09.08.2010 Petitioner being the unmarried girl is apprehending her arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections. 468, 471, 420, 323, 120B of the I.P.C. and Section 138 of the N.I. Act. It is alleged against the petitioner that she received Rs. 35,000/- from the complainant on 24.05.2008 for providing some job to the complainant. Subsequently the cheque was issued on 08.09.2008 by one Mukesh Kumar which got bounced. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no proof of payment of Rs. 35,000/- to this petitioner. Moreover the complaint was lodged after several months of the alleged cause of action on 19.12.2008. It is further contended that paragraph 7 of the complaint suggests that the partnerships between the petitioner and Mukesh Kumar came into existence much prior to the alleged taking of the money. Considering the fact that the alleged bounced cheque was not issued by this petitioner and the 2 contradictory averments in the complaint petition, let the petitioner namely Mina Kumari, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 3457C of 2008. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)