((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.552 OF 2009 Mukesh Dhanbahadur Singh Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent K.H.Giri for petitioner. H.J.Dedhi, APP for State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 07th May 2009 PC : 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner was ordered to be enlarged on bail by order dated 06th January 2009. The petitioner is not in a position to take benefit of the order granting bail as the surety produced by the petitioner has not been accepted. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not in a position to bring the surety in the sum of Rs.30,000/-. He submitted that the surety from Mumbai may be permitted. ((-2-)) 3. After having considered the submissions, the bail amount deserves to be reduced. 4. Hence, I pass following order :- (a) Clause (2) of the order dated 6th January 2009 is modified and it is directed that the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount; (b) Other conditions are not disturbed. (A.S.OKA, J.)