IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.40 of 2007 MOST.JAIMALA SINGH Versus SRI PRADEEP KUMAR & ANR For the petitioner – Sharda Nand Mishra Adv. Dhananjay Kumar gupta Adv. Deepak Kumar Adv. For the Opp. Party – Narendra Kumar Mishra Adv. ----------- 05 23.12.2008 In compliance to the order dated 25.07.2005 contained in Annexure-1, the Opposite Parties have considered the application of the petitioner for his appointment on compassionate ground in place of his deceased father, who was in Work Charge Establishment, and have rejected the same by Annexure-A to the show cause on the ground that there was no provision for compassionate appointment in Work Charge Establishment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are circulars as also there are judgments of this Court which makes the dependent or heirs of deceased employee under Work Charge Establishment entitled for compassionate appointment. In that view of the matter, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file fresh representation before the authorities bringing to the notice the said circulars and judgments of this Court for reconsideration of the matter. If such a representation is filed and the petitioner establishes that the dependents or heirs of an employee having died in harness in Work Charge Establishment are also legally entitled for compassionate appointment, the case of the petitioner shall be considered afresh on merits and appropriate orders shall be passed on the same within one month from the date of filing of such representation. - 2 - With the above observations and directions, this MJC application is disposed of. Kundan (J.N.Singh, J.)