IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22253 of 2011 Ranjeet Rai son of Surendra Rai, resident of village- Permanandpur, P.S- Mahua, District- Vaishali Versus 1. The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 13.7.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No.456 of 2010 registered under Sections 323 and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code besides Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband of Rinku Devi, the daughter of the informant Ravindra Rai and the marriage of Rinku Devi with the petitioner was performed in the year 2005. It has also been submitted that the petitioner is ready to keep his wife, Rinku Devi but she herself is not ready to live with the petitioner. It has also been contended that the petitioner and Rinku Devi have also appeared in the court below on its direction and on the direction of the court below the petitioner has also executed a bond to live with Rinku Devi but his wife Rinku Devi is not willing to live with her as she refused to come with him. 2 The allegation is that all the accused persons including the petitioner being husband demanded Rs.2 lacs as dowry and for non fulfillment of the same tortured Rinku Devi, the daughter of the informant, Ravinder Rai. Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, let the petitioner abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender by him within four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali, in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No.456 of 2010, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Namita ( Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)