dgm gm gm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.2066 OF 2008 PETITION NO.2066 OF 2008 PETITION NO.2066 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.R.D.Suryawanshi for the Petitioners. Mr.G.V.Limaye for respondents 1 and 3. Mr.R.S.Kate for respondents 4 to 7. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V.MOHTA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 15th October, 2008. : 15th October, 2008. : 15th October, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. The petitioner/plaintiff in a Suit for partition moved an application to bring on record the schedule of property which according to them is left out. In a suit for partition, it is desirable that all properties should be part of the proceeding. In view of this, even if there is delay but as it is necessary to adjudicate the issue fully and finally between the parties, I am inclined to grant this application in the interest of justice. The application of amendment is allowed. ( 2 ) Accordingly, the impugned order is quashed and set aside. The writ petition is allowed accordingly by keeping all points open for contesting defendants. However, this is subject to costs of Rs.1500/- to be paid to respondents 1 to 3 within one week from today. [ ANOOP V.qMOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.qMOHTA,J.] ANOOP V.qMOHTA,J.]