IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 16960 of 2008 Between: 1 Fateh Mohd S/o.Shaik Fareed Mulgi No.6/132 situated on near Ashoka Talkies,Main Road Hanumakonda,Warangal 2 Mohd.Afzal S/o.Mohd.Ifran Mulgi No.6/133 situated on near Ashoka Talkies,Main Road Hanumakonda,Warangal 3 Mohd.Shareed S/o.Mohd.Ali Shareed Mulgi No.6/134 situated on near Ashoka Talkies,Main Road Hanumakonda,Warangal 4 Mohd.Saleem S/o.Mohd.Kasim Mulgi No.6/136 situated on near Ashoka Talkies,Main Road Hanumakonda,Warangal ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The AP State Wakf Board, rep.by its Chief Executive officer, Haj House Building,Nampally,Hyderabad 2 Durga HazarathAbdul Nabee Shah Saheb rep.by its Muthawally, Hanumakonda, Warangal 3 Imtiaz Hafeez Jahan Sonof and aged not known to the petitioner R/o.H.No.1-6-30,Jublee Market,m Kazipet, Warangal 4 Masood Pasha Sonof and aged not known to the petitioner R/.o.H.No.3-1-347,East Raipura Hanumakonda Warangal 5 Syed Arif Ali Sonof and aged not known to the petitioner R/o.H.No.7-3-132, Machli Bazar, Hanumakonda Warangal 6 M.A.Mahaboob Ali Sonof and aged not known to the petitioner R/o.H.No.84-54/144,Netaji Nagar Edden Garden,Hyderabad-18 .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue any appropriate writ order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of mandamus declaring action of the 1st respondent issued the impugned proceedings No.4094/WGL/Rent/2008 dated 2.5.2008 in favour of respondents 3 to 6 without notice and opportunity to the petitioners is illegal, arbitrary,malafidy intentional and contrary to the decree and judgement in AS.No.52 of 1995 dated 4.7.1997 on thefile of the I Addl.District Judge, Warangal and also opposed to principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same as illegal,and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.V.BHANU PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: SUBHANI.S.M. The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 18th March, 2009 bcj