IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4591 of 2010 SURESH PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 3. 22.06.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. A show cause is filed on behalf of the Opposite party nos. 9 and 12. Counsel for the petitioner does not deny that the dues payable by the State of Bihar have been complied. He however submits that certain payments for duties discharged in what is now a State of Jharkhand have not been complied with by the Superintendent of Police Dhanbad. Counsel for the State of Bihar submits that this Court had only directed State of Bihar to examine the order of the Superintendent of Police Dhanbad disposing of the representation of the petitioner which has been done. The petitioner had also moved the Jharkhand High Court which had given certain directions to the Superintendent of Police Dhanbad to consider the representation of the petitioner. If the Superintendent of Police Dhanbad has passed any order with which the petitioner is aggrieved and in consequence of which the State of Bihar is not in a position to act upon, the remedy for the petitioner lies in moving before the Jharkhand High Court itself. The Court upholds the submissions on behalf of the State of Bihar. The contempt application is disposed in the aforesaid terms. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)