WPMS No. 66 of 2010 With Stay App. No. 179 / 2010 Urgency App. 281 / 2010 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Anuj Garg, Advocate present for the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Urgency Application No. 281 of 2010 is allowed. By means of this petition, moved under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 23.12.2009, passed by Addl. District Judge / F.T.C. V, Dehradun, in Rent Control Appeal No. 122 of 2008, and order dated 03.03.2009, passed by District Judge, Dehradun, in the aforesaid rent control appeal. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioners are tenants in the shop in question. The respondent landlady appears to have moved an application under Section 21 of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, in the year 2006, which was allowed by the Prescribed Authority vide order dated 29.07.2008. Said order was challenged by the petitioners by filing Rent Control Appeal No. 122 of 2008. At the appellate stage the petitioners moved applications 21-A and 25-A which were rejected by the appellate court (District Judge, Dehradun). Hence, this writ petition. Perusal of the impugned order shows that the petitioners are lingering the appeal by filing unnecessary applications. The appellate court has given detailed reasons for rejecting the applications. In its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, in the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned orders challenged before this Court. Therefore, the petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that the paper in rebuttal which were allowed to be filed by the appellate court may be filed by the next date fixed in the rent control appeal. (Stay Applic ation No. 179 of 2010 also stands dismissed). (P.C.P., J.) Vacation Judge 20.01.2010 HN