LPA No. 1550 of 2010 -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 1550 of 2010 Date of Decision: July 11, 2011 Satish Kumar …Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Addl. A.G. Haryana for the respondents. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The instant appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment dated 23.07.2010 rendered by the learned Single Judge holding that no directions could be issued to implement the policy of the State framed in the year 2002 for regularization of service of ad hoc/ part time employees. In that regard reliance has been placed on a judgment of the Constitution Bench of Hon'ble the Supreme Court rendered in the case of Secretary, State of Karnatka v. Uma Devi, (2006) 4 SCC 1. 2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered view that the opinion expressed by the learned Single LPA No. 1550 of 2010 -2- Judge based on the judgment in Uma Devi's case (supra) does not call for any interference. 3. Accordingly, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE July 11, 2011 Atul