- 1 - 515.735 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLN NO.515 OF 2011 in CRI.REVN. APPLN NO.735 OF 2008 Mr.Kamal Kalyandasani .. Applicant vs 1.Mr.Surinder Kundanani 2.State of Maharashtra .. Respondents Mr.Amar Bhatt for Applicant Mr.Naresh LalChandani and Mr.Santosh Pal for Respt no.1 Mr.A.S.Shitole APP for Respondents CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J DATE: 8th September,2011 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant. By tendering a Purshis/Compounding Petition,it is informed that the matter between the litigating parties is compounded and settled. The Petition is signed by the Respondents, his counsel and also the Applicants. - 2 - 515.735 2. The Applicant has paid a sum of Rs. 50,000/- in cash to the Respondent No.1 which the Respondent no.1 has acknowledged. The sum of Rs.25,000/- in Case No.2307/SS/2006 before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Kurla, Mumbai is to be received by the Respondent no.1. 3. Considering the above facts, the conviction and sentence recorded against the Applicants in Case No.2307/SS/2006 is compounded and it is quashed and set aside in terms of section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. In view of the consent, the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Kurla, Mumbai shall allow the Respondent No.1 (Original complainant) to receive the amount of Rs.25,000/- deposited by the accused. K.U.Chandiwal,J