IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9041 of 2008 SUDHIR SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 05.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under Sections 344, 365, 367, 370/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against one Hare Ram Mahto and this petitioner was that on false promise they took some members of the prosecution side to Andaman Nicobar to work as labourer on daily wages. However, at Andaman Nicobar they did not provide necessary facilities as promised by them. From the order produced by learned counsel for the petitioner dated 29.11.2007 passed in Ceramics. No. 42011 of 2007 it appears that application for bail of Hare Ram Mahto has been allowed by this court. It is said that petitioner is in custody since 14.07.2007. In the circumstances, let petitioner Sudhir Sah be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Matihani P.S. Case No. 56 of 2007. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J)