IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-5849 of 2008 Date of decision:- 17.7.2008 Braham Parkash ...Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Jai Singh Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Navneet Singh, AAG, Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He is having small workshop. He was not indulging in theft of energy. The FIR does not contain any details as to when the inspection was carried out and the petitioner was found to be indulging in theft of energy. It is not disputed that the petitioner has already joined the investigation. Be that as it may, without recording any finding on the merits of the controversy, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 5.3.2008 is made absolute. The petition is disposed of. July 17, 2008 (RAJESH BINDAL) ritu-II JUDGE