Crl. Misc. No. M-38343 of 2010 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-38343 of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 05.01.2011 Hanish Uppal ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & Ors. ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. K.S. Jetley, Advocate for the petitioner. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. Crl. Misc. No. 67858 of 2010 Application is allowed as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No. 480 of 2011 This is an application for placing on record FIR bearing No. 504 dated 23.12.2010 registered under sections 409/420/467/468/471/120- B IPC at Police Station Division No.5, Civil Lines, Ludhiana as Annexure P- 21 and also for exemption from filing certified/original copy of the same. Application is allowed and Annexure P-21 is taken on record. Crl. Misc. No. M-38343 of 2010 The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of petitioner-Hanish Uppal for issuing directions to respondents No.1 to 6 to take into consideration the documents annexed with the petition as Annexure P-1 to P-20 during the investigation of case FIR No. 462 dated 11.11.2010 registered under Sections 408/420/120-B IPC at Crl. Misc. No. M-38343 of 2010 (O&M) (2) Police Station Division No.5, Civil Lines, Ludhiana. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case and he is not responsible for safe keeping of the travellers cheques, cash etc. of the branches under him, which remain under the control of Branch Manager and the Cashiers. Learned counsel also submits that the documents annexed with the petition are not being considered by the investigating agency. I have heard the arguments advanced by counsel for the petitioner and gone through the other documents available on record. It is an admitted case that the investigation has not been concluded so far. Counsel for the petitioner has also not been able to show that these documents have not been considered by the investigating officer. There is no merit in the contention raised by counsel for the petitioner. Dismissed. However, it is made clear that the petitioner may approach the investigating agency with regard to his grievance of keeping travellers cheques, cash etc. January 05, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE Note:-Whether this case is to be referred to the Reporter .......Yes/No