* 1 * FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 342 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 1016 OF 2007 [Shri.Amarjeet Singh Niranjan since decd. Thru.LRS. V/S.Shri.Krishnan Gopi] Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s order or Court’s or Judge’s orders directions and Registrar orders Ms.Sunita Pandey a/w.Mr.Vajida Bihari i/by.L.J.Law adv.for applicants. Ms.Kale h.f.Mr.K.S.Dewal,adv.for respondents. CORAM: SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED: 17TH JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for both sides. 2. This Civil Application is taken out for extension of time to file undertaking pursuant to the order dated 21st January, 2008. By the said order, it was directed that the decree for possession shall not be executed till 20th January, 2011 subject to the condition that the applicants file in the court the * 2 * usual undertaking to vacate the premises within a period of 4 weeks from that day. It appears that the applicants did seek to file an undertaking which was found to be defective. Thereafter, there was another undertaking sought to be filed, which was also defective. This court by its order dated 24th March, 2008 did not take the second Undertaking on record as there was no application for extension of time to file the Undertaking. Considering the fact that the execution of the decree is deferred until 20th January, 2011, the Civil Application deserves to be allowed. The time to file Undertaking is extended by a period of three weeks from today. The Civil Application is accordingly disposed off. [JUDGE]