f0 .3» Q 3mm mm IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR my. (S) No. ....‘.?.¢.13.’.€ ......m9) a“ Shyam Lal Mehar S/o. Late Shambhuram Mehar, aged about ~ 64 year, R/o. Palace Road Raigarh Tah & Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS f RESPONDENDS z 1. " State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary General Administrative, Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer, Raigarh Tah and Distt. Raigarh (C,G.) The Joint Director, Treasury Account & Pension Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ‘ »,4. ‘ i HEGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH‘AT B§LASPUR WRIT PET§T10N {S} No. 7439 of 200$ PETWIONER Shyam La! Mehar. VERSUS RESPGNDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTETUTJON OF IND!A SB: Hon’bie shin; Satish K. AanihGtri. J. Present: Shri Vineet K. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri PK‘Bhadurt, Pane! Lawyer for the State/respendents. - ORDER (ORAL) {Passed on 17‘“ day of December, 2009) 1. Learned ccunset appearing for the petittener submits that despite the order dated 7H3“ January, 20G9 (Annexure P/3) whereby the petitioner has been granted the benefit of seccnd Kramonnatt; the petttioner is not getting the benefit actuaiiy as the Jaint Directcr, Treasury; Accounts 3; Pension; Biiaspur Division has directed the petitiener to contact the respondent No. 2s the District Education Otncer, Raigarh. Shri Pandey further submits that when the petitioner met with the respondent No. 2. the petitioner was informed that the order has aiready been passed and the petitioner shouid approach the respondent No. 3 for release of money. 2. At this juncture. Shri Thakur, iearned Deputy Advocate Generai appearing fer the State/respondent submits that it the petitioner makes a representation to the respondent No.2, the same shaii be considered and order for release of the money shaii be passed in accordance with the order dated .7/t3‘“ January, 2609 (Annexure PIG) within a period of four weeks. Cu in View of the above,.according to iearned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihom Judge Amit . A.,“ ,, w'o /