HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.26104 of 2009 Date: July 5, 2010 Between: Dr. Yenumala Suresh Babu, S/o. Suryavardhi Raj, aged about 41 years, Occ: medical practitioner, Ojaswitha Nursing Home (Partner), D.No.18-648, Chinnuru Road, Mancherial, Adilabad District … Petitioner And The Sub-Inspector of Police, Mancherial, Adilabad District, and four others … Respondents Order: The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that respondents-Police are harassing him, without registration of any crime, at the instance of respondents 4 and 5. Though no counter-affidavit is filed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home produced letter dated 11-12-2009 addressed by the Station House Officer, Mancherial Police Station, Adilabad to the learned Government Pleader for Home. In the said letter, it is stated that fourth respondent herein lodged a complaint against her husband, the petitioner herein, on 17-09-2009 alleging that he was harassing her mentally and physically and had collected Rs.70.80 lakhs as dowry. It is stated that on 16-09-2009 he beat her and threatened with dire consequences and based on the said complaint, a case is registered against the petitioner in Cr.No.371/2009 under Sections 498(A), 323 and 506 of Indian Penal Code, on the file of Mancherial Police Station. It is further stated that after completion of investigation, final report was filed on 29-09-2009 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Mancherial, Adilabad and the same is numbered as C.C.No.326 of 2009. In view of the complaint made by the fourth respondent, wife of the petitioner, pursuant to which crime has also been registered against the petitioner, it cannot be said that respondents-Police are harassing the petitioner without registration of crime. As much as pursuant to the complaint made by the fourth respondent, against the petitioner, crime is registered against him and final report is also filed after completion of investigation, no relief as sought can be granted at this stage. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. ___________________ (R. SUBHASH REDDY, J) July 5, 2010 MRR