IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital the 22nd day of January, 2003 Criminal Misc. Bail Application Number 107 of 2003 Order on the Bail Application CRIMINAL SIDE (1) Mukesh son of Mulayam Singh Yadav, r/o Kanwayee, P.S. Bicholi Kalam, District Etah and (2) Jagdish son of Umrao Jan, r/o Mohalla Ghasinpur, P.S. Sidpura, District Etah …………………..Applicant(s) Versus State of Uttaranchal ……………….. Opposite Party _________________________________________________________________________ Arising out of- Case crime no. 639 of 2002, Under section 2(3) II U.P. Gangster & Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Kotwali, District Hardwar _________________________________________________________________________ By the Court Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Government Advocate. Applicants-accused have been granted bail in all the criminal cases pending against them. There Is no previous conviction to the credit of the applicants and considering this fact, there are reasonable grounds to accept at this stage the argument that the applicants have not committed the offence and there is no likelihood of their involving themselves in similar activity in future, if released on bail. Considering this aspect, in my opinion it is a fit case for bail. Let the applicants (1) Mukesh son of Mulayam Singh Yadav, r/o Kanwayee, P.S. Bicholi Kalam, District Etah and (2) Jagdish son of Umrao Jan, r/o Mohalla Ghasinpur, P.S. Sidpura, District Etah be released on bail in case crime no. 639 of 2002, Under section 2(3) II U.P. Gangster & Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Kotwali, District Hardwar on their each filing a personal bond and adequate sureties each in the like sum to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Hardwar. 22.01.03/B. (Irshad Hussain, J.)