IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16453 of 2009 PRAMOD KUMAR, SON OF VAKIL PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SADHPUR, POLICE STATION GARAKHA, DISTRICT PATNA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLIE, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLIE, SARAN. 3. THE ADHYAKSHA SIPAHI CHAYAN PARISHAD, SARAN, CHAPRA, SAH-THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLIE, ARRAH. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SARAN. ----------- 2. 11.1.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was an applicant for Constable under Advertisement No.1/2004. He states that he was not called for re- measurement on 22.8.2006. He secured 13 out of 15 marks when persons with 12 marks have been appointed. A belated statement has been made that person with lesser marks have been appointed. No disclosure of such name or names has been made. There is no explanation in the writ petition that if the petitioner did not find his name in the list of persons called for re-measurement on 22.8.2006, why he did not protest. The representations appended to the writ petition also does not make any disclosure of the person with lesser marks - 2 - N.H./ stated to have been appointed. If the petitioner files any representation hereinafter making full disclosure of the person with name appointed in his category with marks lesser than 13, the respondents shall be obliged to consider his candidature. This Court on the pleadings as they stand is not persuaded to commence a roving enquiry. The application stands disposed with the aforesaid directions. ( Navin Sinha,J.)