IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6029/2003 (Amrit Vs. State & Ors.) DATE OF JUDGMENT : 15.11.2007 HON'BLE DR. VINEET KOTHARI,J. Mr. J. P. Joshi ] Mr. Tarun Joshi, ] for the petitioner. Mr. O.P.Boob, G.A., for the State. Mr. A. K. Jain ] Mr. J. P. Bhardwaj ] for the respondent UIT. Mr. Tribhuvan Gupta, for the respondent. BY THE COURT: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that this matter is covered by the decision of this Court in identical matters. One such order in S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2766/2001 Jamna Lal Vs. State & Ors. has been produced before the Court. In that order this Court had merely directed that the respondent will consider the application of the petitioner under Section 90B of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act on merits within one month and until the application under Section 90B is decided the status quo shall be maintained. If the grievance of the petitioner remains after decision of the application under Section 90B, he will have liberty to avail such appropriate remedy in appropriate Forum in accordance with law. 2. This Court is of the opinion that these petitions can also be disposed of with the same directions. Learned counsel for the petitioner at bar states that that is the only grievance in this petition as the land acquisition proceedings in question have already been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in U.I.T. Udaipur Vs. Bheru Lal AIR 2002 SC 3308. Learned counsel for the respondent UIT submits that possession of land in question has already been taken. 3. Accordingly these writ petitions are disposed of with the following direction: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that application under Section 90B is still pending. Respondent will consider the application under Section 90B of the petitioner on merits within one month and till the application under Section 90B is decided within one month or for a period of one month from today, whichever is earlier, the status quo of the possession over land in dispute, as of today, shall be maintained. If grievance of the petitioner still remains after decision of the application under Section 90B he will have liberty to avail such appropriate remedy in appropriate forum under the said law. 4. The writ petition thus stands disposed of. No order as to costs. (Dr. VINEET KOTHARI) J. preety Item No. 64