IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28691 of 2011 Nandan Devi @ Nandani Devi Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 30.9.2011 The case has come up under the heading “To be mentioned” at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted that in the bail petition, the person who sworn the affidavit has inadvertently been typed as brother of the petitioner although he is the brother of the husband of the petitioner, which is evident from the First Information Report. Let it be read as “brother of the husband of the petitioner” in place of “brother of the petitioner”. The order dated 2.9.2011 is modified to that extent. Let the order be communicated to the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Kumarkhand P.S. case No.24 of 2011 through fax at the cost of the petitioner. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )