IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37095 of 2009 DINESH SINGH S/O RAM NARESH SINGH R/O GOLA ROAD, DANAPUR, NEAR JANTA COLD STORAGE, P.S.- DANAPUR, DISTT.- PATNA.........................................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR...................................................................................Opposite Party. ----------- 03. 14.12.2009. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Kotwali P.S. Case No.269 of 2009 for offence punishable under Sections 25(A)(1-B) of the Arms Act. The substance of allegation as set out in the First Information Report is that on getting secret information, the informant who is the Sub Inspector of Police posted at Kotwali Police Station reached near the Chirayatard Bridge, Veena Cinema, Patna, and found the petitioner walking down the main road. It is alleged that when he asked this petitioner to stop, he started running away and upon chasing he was apprehended and from his possession it is alleged that two country made pistols of 9 M. M. was recovered out of which one was printed PETRO PAATS MADE IN ITALY and on another Automatic Pistol made in China was printed. The recovery was alongwith four Magazines etc. which are mentioned in detail in the seizure list which is a part of the First Information Report. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the entire occurrence is by reason of an altercation which took place between the petitioner and the informant. Learned counsel with reference to the Annexure-3 of the bail application submits that the petitioner was arrested from 2 his house and his father immediately had written a letter to the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna, mentioning the illegal act of the informant and for taking immediate steps in this regard. Learned counsel points out to the noting made in the said representation mentioning that it was a serious matter. Learned counsel submits that the malafide action of the police is also apparent from the representation of the villagers who have certified the fact about the petitioner being arrested from his house at Danapur and which is placed an Annexure-4 of the bail application. Learned counsel thus submits that the entire allegation is false and he has been malafidely roped in the present case for no offence and he has been wrongly shown to have been arrested from Veena Cinema, Patna merely to bring the offence within the jurisdiction of the Kowari Police Station where the informant is posted. Having regard to the facts and circumstances set forth, let the petitioner Dinesh Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 269 of 2009. U.K. (Jyoti Saran,J)