THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.267 of 2010 26.3.2010 Between: Garapati Rama Koteswara Rao, S/o.Seshagiri Rao …Petitioner and Manepalli Gopala Krishna, S/o.late Subrahmanyam And another …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.267 of 2010 ORDER: First respondent herein filed O.S.No.595 of 2005 for eviction of petitioner and second respondent from the suit schedule premises. He also filed I.A.No.2995 of 2006 under Order XVA of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), as amended by Andhra Pradesh High Court, seeking direction to the tenants to deposit a sum of Rs.30,400/- towards arrears of rent from September 2005 and for a further direction to tenants for deposit of monthly rent of Rs.1,900/- before the Court from January 2007. He relied on his plea that agreed rent is Rs.1,900/- per month. Petitioner herein filed counter opposing the application. Inter alia it was alleged in the counter that he paid an advance amount of Rs.1,50,000/- and plaintiff agreed that an amount of Rs.1,500/- per month, which accrues as interest thereon, shall be deducted every month towards rent, and the remaining amount of Rs.400/- per month has to be paid by tenants. The Court below relied on the rent receipt dated 07.8.2005 in favour of petitioner herein and rejected the plea. The application was ordered directing tenants to deposit Rs.1,900/- per month from September 2005 to the date of disposal of I.A.. Aggrieved by the same, present civil revision petition is filed. The counsel for petitioner and the counsel for first respondent/ plaintiff made their submissions. After hearing the submissions, this Court does not find any error apparent on the face of record. The Court below considered the matter with reference to the pleadings and evidence adduced before it and agreed with the plaintiff that the agreed rent is Rs.1,900/- per month. Be it noted, Rule 2 of Order XVA of CPC obliges the tenant in a suit for eviction to deposit the agreed rent in addition to arrears of rent. In that view of the matter, the impugned order does not suffer from any grave error apparent on the face of record. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. ________________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) March 26, 2010. YS