FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.183 OF 2004 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Vikas Kolekar holding for Mr. Mohan Tekavade for the petitioner. Mr. S.V. Marwadi for the Respondent No.2. Mrs. P.H. Kantharia, APP. for the State. .................. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATED: 18/2/2005. PC: . Advocate Mr. Vikas Kolekar appears on behalf of Advocate Mr. Tekavade and stated that Mr. Tekavade had telephoned him and asked him to seek adjournment. This matter was filed on 29.1.2004 and for over one year the same has not even been circulated. Mr. Marwadi makes a grievance that pendency of this application is being used for seeking adjournment in the Trial Court. I have perused the papers of the petition and found that the same is absolutely frivolous. The first order which is impugned is an order dated 7.3.2003 passed on an application for grant of adjournment on the ground that the applicant was not of sound mind. This application was rejected for lack of any medical papers pertaining to the mental health of the applicant. The matter was carried in revision and while dismissing the revision, the applicant was granted liberty to apply for recalling of the witness examined i.e. Sharda Naidu for cross examination. Liberty was also given to apply for postponing the trial on medical ground after producing proper material. In this view of the matter, not a fit case to interfere. Hence, rejected. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)