IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12555 of 2010 1. PRAMOD KUMAR S/O SRI PRITHVI NATH GUPTA R/O VILL. & P.O. DEPHA BAZAR P.S. JIRADEI, DISTT.- SIWAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY (PRIMARY EDUCATION), HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (PRIMARY EDUCATION), HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DIRECTOR PRIMARY (EDUCATION) EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SIWAN ----------- 02. 31.03.2011 Counsel for the State seems to be correct in his preliminary objection that the petitioner has no case for interference because it is none of his business to demand a direction upon the State not to carry on appointment in relation to an advertisement, which has already been made in 2008 and process initiated though got delayed for one reason or the other. That process has been re-initiated, which the petitioner finds to be objectionable. Stand of the petitioner is that since he has acquired training in the meantime since 2008 and he is also an eligible candidate, opportunity should be given to him to participate in such a recruitment. There is no basis to give such a direction with regard to a process which has already been initiated earlier and that too at a time when admittedly petitioner did not have the requisite qualification. If he has acquired the qualification in 2 the meantime, he has to wait for the next round of selection and advertisement which could be made in this regard. No interference is required nor can any relief be granted in the above stated circumstance in the present writ. It is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)