: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.417 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1407 OF 2008 Pravin Pandurang Shinde .. Petitioner V/s. Governing Council, Dr. D.Y. Patil Pratishthan & Ors. .. Respondents The Petitioner present in person. Mr. V.B. Naik for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, AGP, for Respondent No.3. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 18 TH FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C.: 1. According to the petitioner, the order of this Court dated 21st July, 2008, passed in Writ Petition No.1407 of 2008, has been breached by the respondents. An order was passed by Chandrachud, J. in Writ Petition No.1407 of 2008 directing the respondent No.1 to deposit the back wages in this Court on 24th April, 2008. The back wages have been deposited and invested in a Nationalized Bank. Further, an order was passed on 21st July, 2008 in the said Writ Petition by Majmudar, J. by which the learned Judge has directed that the respondent, : 2 : i.e. the petitioner herein, is permitted to withdraw the accrued interest on the deposit made by the petitioner. 2. Thereafter, another application was moved by the petitioner before this Court. His prayer that the amount of interest should be deposited in his Savings Bank Account through the electronic clearance system was accepted by the order of 12th October, 2009, passed by Tahilramani, J. 3. The petitioner now claims that he has not been paid the correct interest on this deposit. He contends that the interest must be paid by respondent No.1 through its own coffers. According to the petitioner, the interest earned on the back wages is his own amount. The petitioner contends that the amount paid to him reduces each month which causes great hardship to him. 4. In my opinion, this submission cannot be accepted. It does not indicate there has been a breach of the order of 21st July, 2008 passed by : 3 : Majmudar, J. If the petitioner is aggrieved by that order by which the accrued interest on the deposit of back wages is to be paid to him, he will have to either challenge that order or have it modified. No case for admission of the Contempt Petition has been made out. 5. The Contempt Petition is dismissed. .......