:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4328 OF WRIT PETITION NO.4328 OF WRIT PETITION NO.4328 OF 2007 2007 2007 Popat Kesu Kumbhar ..Petitioner. Vs. Malan Dinkar Kumbhar and Ors. ..Respondents. Mr.Rahul Kadam h/for Mr.Warunjikar, advs. for the Petitioner. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : JULY 20, 2007. DATE : JULY 20, 2007. DATE : JULY 20, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, who is original defendant no.1. Plaintiffs/respondents filed a suit for declaration of ownership of the agricultural land on which they claim possession. They also sought temporary injunction. The trial Court passed an order restraining defendants from causing interference in possession of plaintiff no.1 over 35 R. of land in Gat No.285. The defendant no.1 preferred an appeal and in appeal, it was held that the plaintiff was in possession of a stripe of 25 gunthas of land from the northern side. To that extent, temporary injunction came to be modified. The order is challenged in writ petition by the defendant no.1. The learned counsel contends that there is documentary evidence to show that the petitioner/defendant no.1 is in possession of the said land but he is unable to show :2: any such documents. I find no substance in the writ petition. 2. Petition stands dismissed summarily. [J.H.BHATIA, J.] [J.H.BHATIA, J.] [J.H.BHATIA, J.]