1 pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1078 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2128 OF 2008 1. Mrs. Shamim Ishaque Narvel and ors. ..Applicants Vs. 1. Mr. Amir Siddique Patel @ Dada Patel & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. G.S. Godbole with Mr. Indrajeet Kulkarni for applicants. Mr. Sagar Joshi for respondent nos.1,2, 5 to 7. Mr. K.B. Adyanthaya for respondent no.9. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. June 24, 2009. P.C. Heard Mr. Godbole the learned counsel for the applicants. Mr. Sagar Joshi appears for respondent nos.1,2, 5 to 7. Mr. Adyanthaya appears for respondent no.9. We have perused the order passed by this court in A.O. No. 1066 of 1998 on 12/3/1999 as well as the subsequent order dated 9/7/2003 in A.O. No. 309 of 2003. It is submitted by Mr. Godbole that despite the order dated 12/3/1999 House No. 234 which is part of the suit property was sold to respondent no.9 on 22/3/1999 and the remaining suit property is in the possession of the Court Receiver appointed. The rental amounts are being collected by the Court Receiver in respect of the suit property, 2 excluding House No. 234. We direct that the respondent nos.1,2, 5 to 7 and 9 shall not create any third party interest and shall not alienate the suit property in any form to a third party during the pendency of First Appeal No. 2128 of 2008. No further construction on any part of the suit property shall be undertaken without the leave of this court during the pendency of First Appeal No. 2128 of 2008. The Court Receiver, in respect of the suit property, except House No. 234, shall continue. Civil Application is allowed partly. (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)