[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.141 OF 2007 Vasantrao Maruti Mane ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.Venegaonkar with Vinod Wagh advocate for applicant Mr.K.V.Saste A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : MARCH 29, 2007 DATE : MARCH 29, 2007 DATE : MARCH 29, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is apprehending arrest in C.R.No.274 of 2006 of Karveer Police Station, Kolhapur. 3. The learned A.P.P. needs time to take instructions. As far as co-accused in this case are concerned, they have been granted interim protection by this Court upto 4.4.2007. As far as the present applicant is concerned, it is not seen [-2-] that he has not approached the Sessions Court with the prayer for anticipatory bail. Looking to all these facts, in my view, the following order would meet the ends of justice: 4. The applicant be given 72 hours notice prior to his arrest. It is made clear that if such notice is received, the applicant shall approach the concerned Sessions Court. 5. Application is disposed of. [ V.K.Tahilramani, J.]