IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9170 of 2010 BEENA KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Money, if any, was taken by Manish Prasad Singh @ Manish Prasun in the name of providing service to the informant, but all the family members including the petitioners are involved, even making allegation for abusing in the name of petitioner’s caste/scheduled caste without specifying the person / accused rather collectively never constitutes offence under Section 3 (i) (x) of the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act. Taking that into consideration, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No.26/09, above-named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Bhagalpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. V.K. Pandey (Mandhata Singh, J.)