o^ ^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUD1CATURE OF CHHAmSOARH ATBILASPUR Writ Petition fS) N0. 5U3'>- Z20IP Sanat Kumar Pandey S/o Late Ghasi Ram Pandey, Aged about 64years, R/oBlockA, Qr.No.13, RDA Colony, Tikrapara, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) PETITIONER RESPONDENT ^^c^ .^ii^ ^^ VERSUS 1) StateofChhattisgarhthrough The Secretary School Education Departrhent D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ^A" v- .^y ...-•'' The Direetor Public Insfructions Department Govemment | of ChhattisgarhRaipur(e.G.) 1 The District Education Officer, Raipur; District Raipur (C.G.) | WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA .aS>. •<• MIGM COURT0FCHHAn'ISGARH:BILASPUR WRITPETItl6N(S) N0.5492 OF2D10 ^ PETITIONER Sanat KumarPandey Versus RESPONDENTS Stateof Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K.Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Sanjeev Kumar Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. ShriN.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 5 day of January, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearihg for the petitioner submits that despite the communication dated 7-6-2008 by the District EduGation Officer, Raipur, to fhe Block Education Officer, Dharsiwan, Raipur, the petitioner has been deprived of his legal salary for the period from 21-7-2001 to 9-1-2002. 2. Qn query^asto whether the petitioner has approached the District Educatiori Qfficer again seeking compliance af the communicatian datecf 7-6-2088, learnedoounsel appearing for the petitioner eategdriealty'stateS tliat the petitioner has further wrij:ten to the District Edypation^ Offiiser on 2-6-2009 (Annexure — P/5), but-no .payment has been tnade till date. 3.. . At this stage, Shri Roy, tearned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State, submits that if the communicati&n as aforestated has not been complied with it shall be ensured (hat the needful is done within a period of 8 weeks. 4. In viewofforegoihg, aGcordingto the leamedcounselappearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this pefition foradjudication. 5. Accordingly, thewrit petifion is disposed of. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge