HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHIBILASPUR Writ Petition No. 3434 of 2005 Bishat Ram Kanwag Slo. Shri Agwani Ram Kanwar, ‘aged about 52 ears, occupation — service, nior Co—operative spector in the amce Assn. Registrar, Co-opative Society (Audit Board Jagdaipur) Disft. Btar (CG). Versus 'Sta of Chhattisgar, through Chief Secretary, Co-operative Deartment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raip CG). 2) The Registrar Co-opetive Societi Chhattgarh, krishak Naar, Laandi Raipur(CG)i 3 The Assistant Regirar Co-cperative Societies, Jagdaipur, Distt. Basta (C). 4) The Co-opetive Commissioner and Registrar Co—operative Societies, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal (MP. 5) The Registrar, Co—operativ Societies Madhya Prades, opai (MP). 6) State of Madhya radesh, through Secretary, Cooperate Department, BhoaHMP), SB: Hon’ble Mr. SaSsh K Aniotri, J . gh . Pt Shi Sbhh Yd o5l f th titir resen: r uas aav, unse or e peone. ORAL ORDER (Passed on ‘“ day fJne, 2008) 18 ou With consent of earned uns appearing for both t parties, the matter l coel he is ed finally. har 2) erned counsel appeang r the petitioner submits that the petitioner La ri fo does not want press this petition on merit at his stage. Hever, the petitioer to t ow n seeks a direction to the conqerned authorities to consider his representation dated .\ 3'1 -3-2005 (Annexure P.17) pending before the respondent No.2. >~ Petitioner y Se m cf er as Respondents 1) te h p ur ( ra es is g bh: ) st r G ra ) e h Bh , P iv p (Writ etitio under Article 2227 of the Constitution of indi) Pn 6/2 e. Shri MS. Bhatia, Govt. Aocate for the respondents o. 1 t 5/Stae. R dv N o t \ ”2’ 3) Learned counsei appearing for the respondents No. 1 to 5/State famy submits that there is no reason, as to wny the representatron of the petitioner be not considered, in acconiance with iaw, on its own merit. 4) in view of the above submission made by Iearned counsel appearing for it is expedient to direct the respondent No.2 to consider his representation dated 31 the State, -3~2005 (Annexure P/15}, in accordance with iaw, on its own merit, as eariy as possibie, preferabiy within a period of four weeks. 5) .in view of foregoing, the petition is disposed of with above-stated direction. 5d]- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge