THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.783 of 2005 Dated: 18.11.2010 Between: D.Nageswara Rao and others. .. Petitioners. And The District Collector, Nellore, Nellore District, and others. .. Respondents. ORDER: The petitioners filed this writ petition aggrieved by the alleged action of the respondents in canceling the pattas issued in their favour in respect of various extents of the lands i.e., Ac.5.00 in S.No.38-1, Ac.5.00 in S.No.40-3, Ac.3.50 cents in S.No.41-1, Ac.1.29 cents in S.No.41-3, Ac.3.36 cents in S.No.41-2, Ac.1.60 cents in S.No.41-3, Ac.1.01 cents in S.No.40-1, Ac.3.85 cents in S.No.42-2, Ac.4.89 cents in S.No.52-1, Ac.2.89 cents in S.No.32-2, Ac.2.72 cents in S.No.40-4, Ac.1.08 cents in S.No.44-1 and Ac.2.73 cents in S.No.52-2 situated at Thurup Dubagunta village, Kaligiri Mandal, Nellore District, and proposing to assign the same to third parties on 26.01.2005, without issuing any notice to the petitioners and without following due process of law. This Court by order dated 25.01.2005, while admitting the writ petition, directed status quo to be maintained by both parties. However, the said interim order was recalled on 23.11.2006 on the ground that wrong relief was prayed in the writ petition. Learned Government Pleader for Assignments appearing for the respondents submits that against the impugned action of the respondent, the petitioners have an effective and alternative remedy of appeal before the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer, but instead of invoking the said remedy, the petitioners have straight away filed the present writ petition, which is not maintainable. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioners did not deny the submissions made by the learned Government Pleader and sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to file an appeal before the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer against the impugned action of the respondents. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty to the petitioners to file an appeal before the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer against the impugned action of the respondents, and on filing such appeal, if any, the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer shall entertain the same without raising any objection, as to limitation, and dispose of the same as per law. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 18.11.2010 v v