(1) wp2020-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2020 OF 2010 Vinod s/o Harakchand Runwal Since deceased by his L.Rs. Smt. Nirmala @ Shantidevi w/o Vinod Runwal and others PETITIONERS VERSUS Narendra s/o Parsmal Luniya and others. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. A.P. Bhandari, advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Deelip L. Khivesara, advocate for Respondent No.1. ..... CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J. DATED : 30th AUGUST, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard by consent. 2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalna, dated 4th November, 2009 passed below Exh-46 in Special Civil Suit No. 64/2007 whereby his prayer for impounding of Agreement to Sale at Exh-46 has been rejected. (2) wp2020-10 3. It is an admitted fact that the Agreement to Sale was executed on 7th June, 2004. During the relevant period, the Agreement was required to be on a stamp which is necessary for conveyance in case, by the agreement to sale, the possession of property itself is delivered to the prospective purchaser. Admittedly, the Agreement to Sale did not contain any such stipulation. In this view of the matter, the order of the learned Civil Judge needs no interference. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. [ M.T. JOSHI ] JUDGE npj/wp2020-10