HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 22687 of 2009 DATED: 23.10.2009 Between: Vishnu Prasad Agarwal .. Petitioner And The District Registrar & Collector The Sub-Registrar .. Respondents O R D E R:- The petitioner asserts that he purchased the agricultural land of an extent of Ac.1.04 cents forming part of Sy.Nos.738 and 739, situated in Palvancha village and Mandal, Khammam District, under an Agreement of Sale deed dated 16.01.1966, and subsequently, his vendor executed Sale Deed dated 24.09.2003. While so, according to the petitioner, he obtained Valuation Certificate from the 2nd respondent, by paying the required stamp duty, and presented the sale deed before him for registration. Thereafter, the 1st respondent issued several notices to the petitioner undervaluing the land in question by treating it as urban land on the ground that the same is situated adjacent to a Cinema Theatre and the main road and also called for the explanation of the petitioner as to why the land in question shall not be fixed at Rs.3300/- per square yard in addition to the constructions in the site. Then, the petitioner submitted his explanation dated 23.08.2004, but it is his grievance that the 1st respondent has neither considered his explanation/objections nor registered her document. Hence, the petitioner filed the present writ petition seeking appropriate directions. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents, and having regard to the fact that the explanation dated 23.08.2004 purported to have been submitted by the petitioner, is pending consideration before the 1st respondent, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, is inclined to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: “The 2nd respondent-Sub-Registrar is directed to consider the explanation/objections dated 23.08.2004 purported to have been filed by the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner.” Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ C.V. RAMULU, J 23rd October, 2009 bcj