Court No.2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 309 of 2003 Ramesha Lal ……… Petitioner Versus Union of India through Secretary Ministry of Telecommunication (Post & Telegraph) Govt. of India, Sanchar Bhawan, New Delhi And another. ………. Respondents. …………………. Date: July 24, 2008. Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. Heard Sri Pankaj Purohit, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Anjali Bhargava, learned Standing Counsel for Union of India/respondents. Petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal for redressal of his grievance. The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy and the petitioner is relegated to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. Registry is directed to transmit the paper book of the case alongwith order to Central Administrative Tribunal who shall decide the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of record. Till then, interim order dated 30.06.2003 shall remain operative. (P.C.Verma,J.) 24.07.2008 P.Singh