IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22198 of 2011 1. Pappu Yadav 2. Pankaj Yadav 3. Amit Yadav 4. Kailash Yadav 5. Subodh Yadav ------------------------- Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 22.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners including others nine in number are alleged for entering informant’s house, variously armed with weapons but two injuries are apparent on the person of the deceased caused by hard and blunt substance. Three of accused persons including petitioner nos. 1, 4 and 5 are shown armed with Lathi, certainly disappropriate with the number of injuries but their act is forcibly entering the informant’s house and thereafter causing assault not only to the deceased rather to the informant and other family members also but rest are shown including petitioner nos. 2 and 3 armed with fire arms but have not used and previous enmity is also there. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, prayer for bail on behalf of 2 above named petitioners 1, 4 and 5 is rejected. So far above named petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are concerned, their prayer for bail is allowed and they are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in Shambhuganj P.S. Case No. 27/2011. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)