1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. Civil Application No. 3355 of 2009 (In Writ Petition No. 56 of 2009) Madhav s/o. Sidram Kajapure. .. Applicant. versus The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, Department of Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32, & 4 Others. .. Respondent. .................. Mr. B.N. Patil, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. P.M. Shinde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr. V.A. Bagul, Advocate, holding for Mr. V.D. Salunke, Advocate, for respondent nos.3 and 4. Mr. V.S. Panpatte, Advocate, holding for Mr. D.J. Choudhari, Advocate, for respondent no.5. .................. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : 8TH JUNE 2009. 2 COURT’S ORDER : 1. This is an application for amendment. 2. The application is vehemently opposed by Shri Panpatte, learned Counsel holding for Mr. D.J. Choudhari, learned Counsel for respondent no.5. 3. However, taking into consideration the fact that the petition is yet to be admitted, I am inclined to allow the application. 4. Hence, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B". The petitioner to carry out the amendment within eight days from today. Needless to state, that if the respondents desire to file any consequential reply, they would be at liberty to do so. 5. Post the matter for admission after two weeks. ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE ...................... bgp/ca3355 3