IN THE HICH COURT OF KR T B?N 02E DATED THIS THE 3RD DY OF APRIL 1998 BEIO E TE CN’BLE MR.JUSTICE K H N KURANG? qRIT PE ITION NO4O866—68J1993 B,Seetharam, 3/0 Anthaooa Poojary, Aged about 58 yr5, Contractor, Marnarni Katta, Mangaloe D,K. 2, Mend Namadev Shenoy, s/o M Narayena shenov, aged about 5 yrs, Businessman, Near Mangaiadevi Temole Mangaloro, D,K, 3, Virnala Rai, w/o Raaram raF Aaed abo t 46 yrs, Manaoal anaar layout, Mangal adevl, Man;alore, D,K, ,,Petitionc s Repe tiiely, (By Sri Sherin Zafrulla for petrs) . , , , , 2 /2/ AND: I, The Commissioner for Hindu Religions & Charitable Endonents in Karnataka, Shree Malai Mahadeshwara temole complex, Albert Victo road, ChamaraJ pet, Bangal ore—lB. 2. A Ramaflath Hegde, s/o A Karunakar Hegde, Maj or, Marigudi road, Near Mangaladevi temple, Mangalo’e, O.K. 3.B Naravana Karkera, MaJor, Excorporator, Mulihithalu, Mangaiore—5 73 301, O.K. 4, M Vasukwttar, s/o Moovayya, Maj or, Mangalanagar Mangaladevi, ?&n alore, t. 7, Li, t, B Rama Nayai<, Major, Mangaladevi Tmoie, ManjaladPVi, Mangalore. O.K. 6, Shree Manga]adeVi Temnie, Reo, by its Managing Trutee, Manai adc vi, Man’aiore, O.K. I I 3 — - -. — — a — — S e w 44/ /3/ 7 The Dentty Cormissior r for Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments, D.K.Dist.., Manjalore, .,Rsnorrients, Ct WC U u. (By Sri M I Ramanjaneya gowda HOP for RI & 7 Sri M N Hegie for R 2-5 R6 Sd) H.P filed u/a 226 & 227 of the constitution of India with an affidavit craying to: Juash the order dtd,16,11,93 hearing NoADM 8:CR:136:93—94 oassed by 1st respondent at Annex,B and etc., H.P coming on for Hearing this day, the court made the following: ORDER The petitionars have in these netitions sought for quashing of the order iatd 16,11,1993 Annexure B and to direct tne first respondent to mee anoointment of Non—Herenitary Trustees to the petition temple (6th respondent—Shree Manjaladavi Temple) afresh in accordance with law. By Annexure—B the first resoondent appointed resnonaents—2 to S as Non_Hereditary Trustees for a 4 . . . . 2, • 4 /4/ for a period of five years from the date of the order. The date of the order is l6.l1,l993 This Court hes not granted stay of AnnexureB. Now the order Annre B must have been given effect to, Only about S nonths are left for completion of 5 years rntioned in Annexure—B, At this point of time, I am of the opinion thatis not appronriate to interfere with the order Annexure—B passed by the first respoent anccordingly the p titions are disposd of Sd/-Jixlge, Cu COP! .by; - 00I L a a a