C.W.P.No. 226 of 2006. 23.5.2008 Present: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.A. Khan, Central Government Counsel for respondent No.1. Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. Mr. Inderjit Narwal, Advocate vice counsel for respondent No.5. Mr. Haminder Chandel, Advocate for respondent No.6. Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate on the basis of the instructions imparted to him by Sh. Rajiv Bansal, Executive Sales Officer, Shimla submits that the Company is ready and willing to have a re-look on the selection process on the following issues: (a) Capability of the applicant to arrange the finances. (b) Land/infrastructure facilities. However, it is clarified that while undertaking this exercise the cases of the petitioner and alike who had submitted their applications alone will be gone into. The decision will be taken by the company within a period of two months. The effect of re-looking into the matter would be that a fresh panel would be drawn on the basis of the marks allotted to each candidates as per the documents supplied by them on the cut off date i.e. 16th August, 2005. However, before parting with the judgment, it is clarified that none of the parties will claim any equities on the basis of earlier panel drawn in view of the matter being looked afresh, as indicated above. In view of the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Copy Dasti. May 23, 2008 (Rajiv Sharma),J. (GR)