IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6102 of 2009 MD.GHULAM SHAHBAZ ALAM SON OF MD. MERAJ ALAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHAHJUNGI, P.S. HABIBPUR, DISTRICT BHGALPUR ….. PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (PERSONNEL), BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE BIHAR STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, VETINARY COLLEGE, SHEKHPURA, PATNA 6. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION, PATNA ….. RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3. 10.8.2009 Learned Counsel for the Staff Selection Commission has filed counter affidavit, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, Counsel for the State and the Counsel for the Staff Selection Commission. 3. Petitioner was an applicant for the post of Sub- Inspector of Police in the light of advertisement no.704 of 2004 as contained in Annexure-1 to this application. Having appeared in the physical and written selection test, his result was published in the newspaper dated 30.5.2008. Copy whereof is contained in Annexure-2 to this application, whereafter he was furnished with the call letter bearing Memo no.4245 dated 4th September, 2008 (Annexure-4) calling upon the petitioner to produce his testimonials for verification so that he can be allowed to proceed for training. 4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in 2 spite of having made himself available in the light of the instructions contained in the call letter dated 4th September, 2008 (Annexure-4), he is not being allowed to join the post of Sub-Inspector of Police as also not being sent for training and highlighting such fact the present writ application has been filed to direct the State respondents to honour the call letter bearing Memo no.4245 dated 4th September, 2008 (Annexure-4). 5. Learned Counsel for the Staff Selection Commission has opposed the prayer with reference to the averments made in the counter affidavit filed today and submits that a batch of writ petition bearing C.W.J.C.No.9155 of 2008 and other analogous cases was filed before this court in which directions were given to reevaluate the question paper and model answers and in the light of the directions of this court in the batch of writ petitions the question and model answers were again examined by the expert committee and in the light of the report of the expert committee the result has been revised and in the light of the revised result, petitioner does not come in the merit list and as such the call letter served on him and others should be taken as cancelled. Such deemed cancellation of the call letter is unknown to this court. 6. In the circumstances, I direct the police headquarter to consider the contents of the call letter bearing Memo no.4245 dated 4th September, 2008 (Annexure-4) in the light of the order of this Court passed on 25.11.2008 in 3 C.W.J.C.No.9155 of 2008 and analogous cases(Annexure-6) as early as possible in any case within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and if in the light of the revised result petitioner does not come within the merit list then should pass reasoned order recalling the contents of the call letter bearing Memo no.4245 dated 4th September, 2008 (Annexure-4). 7. With this direction, this writ application is disposed of. Narendra/ ( V. N. Sinha, J. )