IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 20408 of 2007 Between: 1 Syed Nazia Hussaini D/o S.M. Hussaini Minor being rep by her fatehr and natural guardian, S.M. Hussaini S/o S.A. Hussaini aged 45 years 2 Syed Hazira D/o Late Syed Vazid Hussain, Minor being repby her guardian syed Hasan Ahmed Hussainy S/o S.A. Hussainy aged 37 years Both R/o 20/1507/2, Mansoor Nagar, Nellore. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, repbyits Secretary, Youth Advancement, Tourism and Culture (Sports) Department, at Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences Andhra Pradesh at Vijayawada, rep by its Registrar. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate wRit, or Writs, order or Direction, declaringthe action ofthe Respondents in providing only 3 seats for sports and games category, as against 0.5 % of total seats, in S.V. University Local Area, which comes to 4 seats, forthe purpose of admission into medical stream, for the academic year 2007-08 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the rules framed in G.O.Ms. No. 136 dt 30-4-2007 and G.O.ms. No. 231 dt 11-7-2007 and to consequently direct the respondents to provide 0.5 % reservation under Sports and games category inthe S.V. University Local Area and also provide for 30% reservation to the women candidates out of the said 0.5% ; Award costs and pass such other or further orders, as are deemed fit and proper inthe circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.SRIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FAMI.WELFARE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 20408 OF 2007 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the writ petition does not survive. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ____________ (G. ROHINI, J.) 30.04.2009 Stp ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRT}