IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34779 of 2009 ANWARUL HAQUE, son of late Md. Nazir, resident of village- Jaley, P. S. Jaley, District- Darbhanga. … Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 01.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, counsel for the informant as also counsel for the State. The prayer for bail of the petitioner for offence under Sections 376, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code was earlier rejected by a reasoned order dated 9.7.2008 in Cr. Misc. No. 8569 of 2008. Renewing the prayer for bail, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there are fresh materials on which the case of 80 years old petitioner should be considered. Counsel for the informant on the other hand would submit that the trial has already commenced and six out of nine witnesses have already been examined. In that view of the matter, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner but at the same time the trial court is directed to ensure that the trial of the petitioner is completely positively within a period of six months from today. 2 With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is dismissed. In the event the trial of the petitioner would not be completed within a period of six months, the petitioner will have liberty to initially move the trial court for grant of bail which then would record reasons for not concluding the trial within the aforementioned period of six months and only whereafter the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before this court. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)