^R^i.^gWW HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISQARH: B1LASPUR WrB PetiUon No.^727_ufj®)4 Petjtioner Smt. Malti Yadav, Wd/o. Late Tulsiram Yadav, aged about years, R/o. Ramayan Chowk, Chat&diah, Biiaspur, Tehsii 8, District Bilaspur (CG). ResBondenjs Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Department of Co-operative Sooieties Chhattisgafh, D.K.S. Buiiding, Ralpur(03). 2. The Registrar, Co-operatlve Societies Chllatti^arh, Near Agriculture Coltege, Labhandi, Raipur, Tehsil and District Raipur (CQ). 3. Chief Executive Officer (General Manager), Zila Sahakari Kendri Bank Maryadit, Bitospur Near'Nehru Chowk, Tehsil and District. Klaspur (CG). 4. Reglonal CoRnmissioner, R^lohal Provident Fund Office, Navbharat Comptex, Rajbardha maidan, Teh. & Dist Raipur (CG). 0/Vrit Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India.; SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Presenfc None forthe petitioner, Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State. T^t^uff ORAL ORDER {Passed on Uiis 7 day of August, 2008) The matter Is calted for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor 'is any representation macte on behalf of.the petitioner The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. 2) tn view ofthe above, the writ petitlon is dismissea for want of prosecution. Sd/- SatishI^.Agnihotri Judge >