THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4331 of 2007 Date: 30.10.2009 Between: Kondapavuluru Satyanarayana … Petitioner And Bathula Venkata Reddy … Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4331 of 2007 ORAL ORDER : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant. 2. This civil revision petition is filed aggrieved by the judgment and decree, dated 10.10.2006, in A.S.No.8 of 2006, passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge (Fast Track Court), Gudivada, Krishna District, dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree, dated 28.12.2005, in O.S.No.201 of 1999, passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Gannavaram, decreeing the suit for recovery of money. 3. I have perused the judgments passed by both the Courts below and also the material available on record. 4. Since the decretal amount is only for a sum of Rs.10,420/- and is barred under Section 102 of C.P.C., to file a second appeal, the present revision came to be filed. 5. The suit was instituted on the strength of a promissory note, dated 13.9.1996. It appears that the petitioner/defendant has raised two contentions – firstly; regarding the genuineness of the promissory note, and secondly; on the question of limitation. The trial Court after considering the evidence and the material available on record, rightly decreed the suit and the same has been confirmed by the lower appellate Court. I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the judgments rendered by both the Courts below. 6. For the foregoing, there are no merits in the civil revision petition and the same is liable to be dismissed. 7. In the result, the civil revision petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 30.10.2009 Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4331 of 2007 30.10.2009 (Msr)