1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. FIRST APPEAL NO.813 OF 1993 FIRST APPEAL NO.813 OF 1993 FIRST APPEAL NO.813 OF 1993 The State of Maharashtra : Appellants. versus Shri Krishna Namdeo Patil : Respondent. WITH WITH WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.815 OF 1993 FIRST APPEAL NO.815 OF 1993 FIRST APPEAL NO.815 OF 1993 The State of Maharashtra : Appellants. versus Shri Dharma Gosavi-Patil & ors. : Respondents. WITH WITH WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.908 OF 2004 FIRST APPEAL NO.908 OF 2004 FIRST APPEAL NO.908 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra : Appellants. versus Shri Shrawan Narayan Patil since deceased by his heirs Smt.Bhimbai S. Patil & ors. : Respondents. 2 2 2 WITH WITH WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.631 OF 1995 FIRST APPEAL NO.631 OF 1995 FIRST APPEAL NO.631 OF 1995 The State of Maharashtra : Appellants. versus Shri Janardhan Dinkar Mhatre & ors. : Respondents. WITH WITH WITH FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.7463 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.7463 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.7463 OF 1992 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2503 OF 1992 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2503 OF 1992 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2503 OF 1992 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3263 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3263 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3263 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra : Appellants. versus Shri Kachru Milu Patil & ors. : Respondents. WITH WITH WITH FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.7457 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.7457 OF 1992 FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.7457 OF 1992 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2507 OF 1992 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2507 OF 1992 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2507 OF 1992 WITH WITH WITH 3 3 3 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3262 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3262 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3262 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra : Appellants. versus Shri Valmik Keshav Mhatre & ors.: Respondents. Mr.A.R.Patil, AGP, for the State. Mr.K.N.Kore for the respondents. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 26th October 2005. DATED : 26th October 2005. DATED : 26th October 2005. COMMON ORAL ORDER COMMON ORAL ORDER COMMON ORAL ORDER 1. So far as Civil Application No.2503 of 1992 in F.A.St.No.7463 of 1992 is concerned, it is for condonation of delay of 58 days in filing the appeal. The advocate for the respondents has no objection Hence the civil application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Civil Application is disposed of. 2. So far as Civil Application No.3263 of 2004 is concerned in F.A.St.No.7463 of 1992 is concerned, it is for bringing the legal heirs on record of the deceased respondent No.6. The 4 4 4 advocate for the respondents has no objection. Hence the civil application is allowed. Memo of appeal to be amended forthwith. 3. So far as Civil Application No.2507 of 1992 in F.A.St.No.7457 of 1992 is concerned, it is for condonation of delay of 58 days in filing the appeal. The advocate for the respondents has no objection Hence the civil application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Civil Application is disposed of. 2. So far as Civil Application No.3262 of 2004 is concerned in F.A.St.No.7457 of 1992 is concerned, it is for bringing the legal heirs on record of the deceased respondent No.5. The advocate for the respondents has no objection. Hence the civil application is allowed. Memo of appeal to be amended forthwith. 3. So far as all the appeals are concerned, they are arising out of land acquisition proceedings from village Kopar Khairane. The reference Court awarded compensation at the rate of Rs.10/- per sq.mtr. in all these cases for the acquired lands. Many matters from village 5 5 5 Kopar Khairane were decided by this Court and Rs.10/- per sq.mtr. is the proper rate of compensation, even the case of enhancement is made out. Therefore, there is no substance in all these appeals. Hence all the appeals are dismissed. No order as to costs in all the appeals. [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J]