1 INTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. No. ..^.^3...../2006 PETITIONER ..-^^ ^^,.;-^-;, f^'..^'^-?""..."•'"' 'M" ..<•••"" \vc »<>y..^"^3>>"' ^' A.-" yua> Dinesh Singh Rajput Aged about 37 years S/0 Lafe Shri Lakhan Singh Thakur R/0 Rajput Niwas, ih front of Maharana Pratap Para, Kaliward, Ward No. 19, Thakur Para, Kawardha District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: ? fiY' 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of Education DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (Chhattisgarh) !. Director Directorate of Public Education, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Collector District Kawardha (Chhattisgarh) District Education Officer District Kawardha (Chhattisgarh) Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat Kawardha ;^^'-».. ^^^ -s^^^p District Kawardha (ChhattisgA-h) PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANGE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- T XI-HC-22 'T5ET ^ll'tllcl'1!, (?fl1tl'16, factl'My 3:ii^r^i h-V^ 3!^V »i*lich^rf^tT 'Mi.^s.06 NWCTI aiiich .. r—..••^^g^ 5 ^i^ar- 3n^TTRnws)%?r 2-2- Shri Prateek Sharma, counsel Ohr. Csn^ iyan ni.h •UC;S;t-,' i-^U^ev, r'. A f.^, v-i.n., i^-ii Application for urgent nearing ^:'''*Wf?l'iil^ tffTCff fl fet^ (Ril^K ^ srfigir SD^F Iforthepetitioner. the State.. s ailo'/i/ea. Heard. • . Counsei for the petiiioner suifimits that the petitioner's father, who was working.as Head iviaster in Govt. Mipdte Schooi died during sen/ice.period on 1/11/1998 ana' thereafter he appiied for compassionate appointment whic'n v/a.s denied. It is further submitted that in fsateh of cases bearing 'w.P. No.1322/2002 involving tne same question ora'er 20/12/2005. He prays that similar orq Learned counsel ror tne Statel s nave been passea Dy tnis (Jourt on 'ers may oe passed in tnis case atso. does not dispute tne aoove fact and states that the State of Chhattisgam has jaken a decjsion to consider the cases of dependants'of those employees w|io died on or.after 1/11/1997 strictly in accoraance witn tne policy prevalent n view OT tne submissions rjiade by learnecs counsei appeanng tor tne parties, witnout expressing any opini or this uourt, ends of justice wili Oe tne petitioner in accordance v»'itnth^ Bttnattime.' ^n on the merits Qf the ease, in the opinion sewed if a direction is' given to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities cor|cemed to^consider and decide the case of poiicy prevaient at the time of death of his ratner. IT the petitioner round eiigibi4 appointment orcters wiii be issued as early as possible preferably within four mc|nths from the date of production ofthe copy of this order. The petitioner is aiso| directea to render due co-operation to the authorities. It is made clear that if ad avaii tne remedy availabie uncieF tr| Court. ly grievance stiii remains, tne petitioner may e iavi/ including niing of petition beTore tnis Withthe aroresaid observaticjns, this petition stands disposed of. Certlfied copy as per rules. 1 Uopy ,to tne State counsel, v, .to the respondents for oompiiance. 'ho Vk'iil be obfiged to communicatethe order Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge