1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.451 of 2006. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, office Memoranda of Coram Court's or Judge's appearances, Court's orders or directions order and Registrar's order. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr.S.Z.Sonbhadre, Adv.for the petitioner. Mr.Y.B.Mandape A.P.P.for the respondents. CORAM: K.J.ROHEE & C.L.PANGARKAR,JJ. DATE : 17th October, 2006. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. On 2/8/2006 the petitioner lodged report at Police Station,Tahsil (Nagpur) about loss of a bag containing cheques, stamp papers, bills and cash of Rs.600/-. This report was lodged to Police Inspector, Police Station Tahsil (Nagpur). Thereafter, the petitioner also informed the concerned bank about loss of the cheques. He also published a public notice. On 13/9/2006 he lodged another report with Police Inspector, Police Station, Tahsil (Nagpur) that a false report has been lodged against him by respondent no. 4 and that he is being harassed. Since no action was 2 taken in respect of any of his reports, he approached Commissioner of Police, Nagpur as well as Assistant Commissioner of Police, Kotwali Division, Nagpur on 15/9/2006. From the reply filed on behalf of respondent no.2 it seems that inquiry into the alleged reports filed by the petitioner reveals no substance. In view of this, it is apparent that the petitioner has to take action against respondent no.4 under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure. There are no grounds to invoke extraordinary powers under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition is, therefore, dismissed in limine. JUDGE JUDGE pzc