IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.217 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.217 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.217 OF 2005 IN IN IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. OF 2005 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. OF 2005 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. OF 2005 Ranjana Shivaji Jadhav .. Applicant V/s Shivaji Gangadhar Jadhav .. Respondent Mr.K.R.Parekh for the Applicant. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : 14.12.2005. DATE : 14.12.2005. DATE : 14.12.2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant. It appears that the packet sent to the Respondent by Registered Post A.D. has come back with the remark "refused to accept". The learned Counsel for the Applicant undertakes to file an affidavit of service within a period of one week from today. By this Civil Application Applicant is seeking condonation of 192 days delay in filing the Appeal. Perused the Civil Application. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)