’ox J 1N; THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTAREGARH AT BILAspUR w.P. (S) No. §o\1~ ' Izolo Qgaok 3"“g‘e Bench 1 x PETITIONERS : yL’achhman Prasad Slahu, S/o Shri Sankar Lal Sahu, aged abopt 50 years, Gangman, 5 Office of Sub— Div;isiona1 Offlcer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) . Kéushal Prasad Ve v a, S/O Shri kali Ram Verma aged about! 55 years, Gangman, Office of Sub- Div‘isional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) i . Pardesi Ram, S/o Ghait Ram Sahu, aged about 55 years, Gangman Office of Sub— Divisional Officer} P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.Gi) 4. Bisru Das, S/o Shri Chainu Das, aged (about 54 years, Office of Sub- Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhata‘para, District Raipur (C.G.) . Smt. Nirmala Verma.” W/o Sri Kaushal Prasad Verma, agedabout 52 years, Office of Sub— Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) 6/Smt. Amola Baj, W/o Dau Ram aged / about 56 years, Office of Sub— Diyisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raiur (C.G.) . mt. Khediya Bai, W/o Viswa nath, aged about 52 years, Office of Sub- DivisiOnal Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur L 7 (C.G.) g 8 t. Dukhiya Baj , W/o Ghasi Ram Sahu, aged about 50 years, Office of Sub- Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) 9xSiht. Ganesiya Bai , W/o Sukhi Ram f Yadav, aged about 62 years, Office of‘Sub— Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) , i .6‘hhedi Lal Verma, S/o Vishal Verma, ”M— aged about 62 years, Office of Sub- Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) @ r p ‘‘ 1 Arfjorva, S/o Udho Satnami, aged about 55 years, Office of §ub¥ Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) <Deo Singh, S/o Chaitu Dhruv, aged about 55 years, Office of $ub- Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (QGJ .Mmgloo, S/o Dhansay Yadav, aged 55 l years, Office of Siilb— Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) 4. nt Kumar S/o Bi’sahu Satnami, aged 1 about 50 years, Office of Sub- Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhat:apara, District Raipur (C.G.) " i 15 Sudhee S/o Samnfe Lal Satnami, aged about 55 years, Office of Sub- Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) étBipat Ram S/o Mahbsh Nisad, aged about ' 55 years, Office of Sub— Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) 17 Smt. Bit Kumar W/o Late Sukhchand, 4 aged about 52 years, Office of Sub- Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) 1 . am Singh S/o Shree Ram Y'adav, aged about 53 years, Office of Sub- Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) 1 inchha Ram S/o Binzwar, aged about 54 years, Office of Sub— Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) {Ramhan Dhruv S/o BhagelaDhruv, aged about 55 years, Office of Sub— Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) (Rama Yadav S/o Khedu Ram, aged about ' 55 years, Office of Sub— Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) .Vivek ‘Das S/o Hemu Das, aged about Slyears, Office of Sub- Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) . adhe Lal S/o Sukhara Satnami, aged about 55 years, Office of Sub- Divisional Officer P.W.D. Bhatapara, District Raipur (C.G.) ‘4‘ ,v irg @ bout 5O ears Off1ce o Sub— D1v1s1on ’ lcer D ataara, lsnc alpur (C about hd 50 Verma years, S/o O£lf1ce Kah of Ram Sub— Verma, D1v1s1ona age ff1cer P W D Bhataara, Dlstrlct Ralur ) agat Ram S/o Han rasad Verma, age bout 56 years, Off1ce of Sub D1v1s1ona fficer PW D Bhatapara D1str1ct alur C g ?nt adav Dharmm aed abo So 6 ate ears uaru 1ce o u a D1v1s1ona ce D1str1ct Ralpur (C G a y, ‘ f al Off P W Bhp Dtt R G) W d 1 O p p (CG P d a l O Rp ( G) /SY, g u / O L y Bdh Off f Sb— Ds l Offir; w k d 1v about an Das 55 years, S/o Manglu Office of Man1pur1, Sub D1v1s1ona age P W D Bhtp, aaara VRSUS E _ 1 rh State of Chhattlsga Through, Secretar inance Departm My (CG) an‘tralaa, D.K.S.;Bhavan, ‘Raipur ;. ; Dretor FinnCe, ccounts 5 ers nannd Naar, Rai‘ur C, 3 bh Wk Dtt a C G ) ‘ , c ks D Secretary Puc ors eparmen n, Mantralay, Ra1pur ( ' K Publ1 Wor epartment \Dlvare1on Bafoda Bazar, p ( ) Ra1ur C G RIT PEITITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE C F INDIA FOR ARESUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE O ANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC OR AN THER {DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN TH MATTE V 1 Tire Hon’ble Chief Justce an are Compampn Justices of the Hon’ble Hlh Court of Chhattaregarh at Bilaspu ESPECTFULLY SH. _ DETAILSOF H ETTION TE PI P i X I p r ( ) ‘ » Officer P W D Bhataara, Dlstr1ct Ralpu C G § ; y,; F eri RESPbNbENTs ‘ i 2 ic, a A 8 Piion, A g p (G.) W ONSTITUTION O F v M Y O E R To, ; i d h g r R OWETH i I ! , (K ARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS . l PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice P'ritinker Diwaker) Writ Petition (S) No‘ 5017 of 2010 VERSUS CONSTITUTIONOFINDIA O R D'E R . (03.09.2010) At the outset, counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permittec to withdraw this petition with liberty to make representation in terms of order: ‘ dated 30.6.2010 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 3412/2005. HeE" ‘l V also prays for a direction to the respondent No.1 to decide the representatior 1 y made by the petitioner in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Counsel for the respondents/State submits that in accordance with law ‘ the petitioners are not entitled for the reliefs sought for in the present petition; LHe" however submits that the representation made by the petitioner would b 1i decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty. aforesaid. lf the petitioners make representation detailing their grievances, th same is expected to be decided by the competent authority in accordance witti y law as early as possible 4» l It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any, opinion on the%i ; merits of the case and the competent authority would be free in deciding the y ‘ representation of the petitioner on its own merits. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker é Judge it.t Lachhman Prasad Sahu and others State of Chhattisgarh and others Shri Sunil Otwani counsel for the petitioners. Shri Pravin Das Dy. GA forthe respondents/State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE a a e‘ e r