IN THE OF AT M.A.NO.Cc^"r!5^ / 2006 |J©||@ggj^.Ii. Appellant ^rsurer Divsional Manager I.C.I.C.I. Lombard General Insurancc Company Ltd., Divisional Office, Kolkatta- (W.B.), Through - Branch Manager I.C.I.CJ. Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd., Jain Plaza, C.M.D. Chowk, Link Road, Bilaspur-(C.G.) Versus ResDondents --S- ^M^ KW ^ .'-s ^ > 3. Narayan Singh Barman. S/o LaJdiati Singh Barrnan, Aged about 30 years, R/o Vxllage Parasiya, Tehsil - Mungeli, Dist: Bilaspur-(C.G.) -° %^' CLAIMANT- Narayan Prasad S/o Chaitram Yadav, Aged about 22 years, R/o Hirri Mines 70 Unit, Tehsil - Takhatpur, Dist: Bilaspur-(C.G,) -DSaVER" Manjit S/o Ra?n Narayan Singh Aged about 40 years, R/o Rajendra Nagar, P.S. ~ Civil Line Bilaspur. Dist: Bilaspur-(C.G.) -INS^REte^ u/s \^" XI-HC-78 ^n^T^rf^F cTSTT3Ti^T$b^i4) HI+<^1 Sh*1ich 3:^"?2TraT?ra", 8>Tf1<i'i<o, RtciHy • • ^ •'• ••'-•'•• <( • • • •A • ••* • ^y200^ t?T ^5<ch (^cit^q^) ^RTT^K ^f??T 3TI^T 11-12-2006 Shri Raj Awasthy, learned Heard on I.A.No.4073/2C document on record. Learned counsel for the required under Section-173 of IV deposited with the learned M.A.C I.A.No.4073/2006isaliow€ Aiso heard on I.A.No.407^ exemption from filing permission Prayer is allowed. Heard on admission. The only point urged by appeal is that the premium shov| the clajmant/applicant before th^ was not received by the Insur^ Para-13 of the impugned award| (N.A.W.-1) for the Insurance Co| The conclusion drawn by the lea| the offending vehicle was insi| cannot be faulted with. In the result, this Miscellal is dismissed. No order asto cost^ c^i^fci4i^ wMt* ^'tscs <r^^i< ^3^R'3TT^?T bounsel for the appellant. 106 which is an application for taking appellant submits that-the amount as otor Accident Claims Tribunal has been .T. •d. /2006 which is an application for granting jnder Section-170 of Motor Vehicle Act. earned counsel for the appeliant in this ^n in the photocopy of the poiicy filed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tiibunai nce Company. Upon careful perusal of it is clear that the witness Kushai Pole npany did not specificaliy deny this fact. 'ned Motor Accident Ciaims Tribunal that red by the appeilant-herein, therefore, leous Appeai is devoid of any merit and Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge P.T.O. ^ v<'