IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2008 / 1ST MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 29669 of 2007(F) -------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. A.VIJAYA KUMAR,S/O.K.MAHADAVAN NAIR ADANATTU HOUSE, KADAVANTHRA P.O.,KOCHI-20. 2. N.A.ABRAHAM,S/O. ALEXANDER MANIVELIL HOUSE ,PANAMPILLAY NAGAR,COCHIN-36 3. NELSON,S/O. LONAN, THAYANKERIL HOUSE, KADAVANTHRA P.O. KOCHI-20. 4. P.S.SHAJEEVAN S/O. SASI, PULITHARA, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, P.O.KOCHI-36. BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR, SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,ERNAKULAM. 2. ELAMKULAM VILLAGE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,LTD NO.569, ERNAKULAM. KOCHI -682 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.ABRAHAM MATHEW (VETTOOR). THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/01/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.29669 of 2007-F = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 21st day of January, 2008. JUDGMENT According to the petitioners, they are eligible for membership in the second respondent society. Since they made necessary applications and remitted requisite fee but were not given membership, they moved the first respondent in terms of the statutory provisions after obtaining a judgment of this Court. The first respondent has directed the second respondent society to issue membership. This writ petition is filed seeking the enforcement of that direction. As of now, the second respondent has placed on record Ext.R2(a) appeal and Ext.R2(b) application for stay before the Registrar of Co-operative Societies in which appeal, the second respondent WP(C)29669/2007 -: 2 :- has challenged the decision of the first respondent. Under such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing that Ext.R2(a) appeal will be taken up, considered and disposed of in accordance with law by the competent authority within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment and Ext.R2(b) application for stay will also be considered within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say, the writ petitioners and the society will be heard in relation to such proceedings. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/