IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.391 OF 2009 Nagesh Narayan Gangekar ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent --- Shri Manoj A. Patil for Applicant Shri D.P. Adsule, APP for State. ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 3RD FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail. 3. It is alleged that the Applicant himself had filed a complaint, in which he alleged that the members of the Complainant's group had assaulted him with a sword and lethal weapons and, as a result, he was injured and he had been advised to take complete bed rest. It is submitted that on the contrary, a complaint is filed against the present Applicant alleging that the Applicant had assaulted the persons from the complainant's group. The record indicates that the Applicant's complaint was lodged at 4.10 p.m., whereas the complainant in this case had lodged a complaint at 3.50 p.m. 4. That being the position, it is not possible to grant anticipatory bail to the present Applicant. The Applicant, however, may approach the Competent Court and seek regular bail. Eight days' time is given to the Applicant to surrender. 5. Application is, accordingly, disposed of in the aforesaid terms. V.M. KANADE J.