1 conp-59-05-s-1638 -05 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 59 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO. 1638 OF 2005. Mohammed Abdul Sattar. ..Petitioner/Plaintiff. vs. Mohammed Hanif Shaikh Abdul Hafeez and Others. ..Respondents. .... None for Petitioner. None for Respondents. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 19TH NOVEMBER 2010. P.C. In this Contempt Petition, the Petitioner and/or his Advocate have not appeared since inception. However, by an order dated 18th June 2008 of this Court [Coram :Bhosale, J.], notice was issued under Rule 1036(1) of the High Court (Original Side) Rules, to the Respondents, returnable on 30th July 2008, through the Office of Sheriff. 2. Though the Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 5 were served, Respondent Nos. 2, 4, 6 to 10 could not be served on the ground that they had gone out. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 10th July 2009, one more attempt was made to serve Respondent Nos. 2, 4, 6 to 10. However, they had already left the premises and 2 conp-59-05-s-1638 -05 they could not be served. The alleged contempt pertains to breach of the consent terms filed by the parties in June 2005. As set out hereinabove, the Petitioner has not come forward even once to support the Contempt Petition. 3. In view thereof, the Contempt Petition is disposed of as dismissed. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]