IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12545 of 2011 Sonu Singh @ Sonu Kumar Singh, S/O-Parmanand Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04 25.08.2011 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 364, 364 (A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Although, petitioner is not named in the first information report but it appears from the impugned order that in course of investigation petitioner and some co-accused persons were caught by the police along with the victim of the case and some fire arms were recovered from possession of petitioner. It would also appear from the impugned order that victim disclosed the name of the petitioner and also identified him and furthermore, victim disclosed the manner in which the alleged occurrence took place. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in course of trial informant and victim have not supported the prosecution story rather victim stated a different story. It is further submitted by him that victim disclosed that an accident took place on the alleged date of occurrence and after that he was assaulted by some persons and in the meantime, police party reached there and apprehended the aforesaid persons. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as 2 well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 275 of 2010 pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui is, hereby, rejected. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)