IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.1521 of 2010 1. RAM PADARATH YADAV, S/O LATE SAUDAGAR YADAV 2. SANJAY YADAV, S/O RAM PADARATH YADAV 3. KAILU YADAV, S/O RAMOTAR YADAV 4. BRAHAMDEO YADAV 5. INDRADEO YADAV, BOTH SONS OS MAUZA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 29.01.2010 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners are named in the first information report on account of suspicion as there was an earlier case pending between the parties and, therefore, speculation that it is for that reason the present occurrence has been committed, let the petitioners, above named, who are in custody since 25.07.2009 and 27.07.2009 respectively and has no criminal antecedent be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Ghoswari P.S. Case No. 47 of 2009 to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, on the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of each of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how 2 he is related with the petitioners, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner(s) is/are implicated in any other case of similar nature after his/their release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he/they fail(s) to do so on two given dates and delay(s) the trial in any manner then his/their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)