IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41138 of 2010 RAJ LAL SINGH @ RAJ LAL MAHTO, SON OF SHIV SHANKAR MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MALMAL TOLA, P.S. KALUAHI, DISTT. MADHUBANI. ------ PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. NEELAM DEVI, WIFE OF LATE KISHUNDEO MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MALMAL TOLA, P.S. KALUAHI, DISTT. MADHUBANI. ------ OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 11.03.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 8.9.2010 passed in Sessions Trial No. 350 of 2010 by the Sessions Judge, Madhubani, by which an application under Section 227 Cr. P.C. has been disallowed. It has been submitted that the present case is a counter blast to the case instituted by the petitioner and in fact, the petitioner was a minor at that point of time whereas the lady in question was major having three children, so, the entire allegation is false. Since these are matters which can only be adequately agitated before the trial court, I am not inclined to interfere in the order impugned. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)