IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29167 of 2010 SYED AFSHAN RAHMAN @ AFSHAN RAHMAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.08.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the I.P.C. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the sister of the actual property holder who resides in England. The claim of the petitioner is that after death of the mother, initially her brother entrusted the property for being taken care of and subsequently by an oral gift (Hibba)executed by brother of the petitioner. She came in possession of property and alienated part of the property. Moreover, the title suit is pending for the same property prior to the institution of the present case. Considering the fact that both sides disputes each other document and the title suit 2 was filed prior to the present criminal case, let the petitioner, Syed Afshan Rahman @ Afshan Rahman, be released on bail in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Sadar Kotwali P.S. Case No. 129 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)