THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4067 & 4086 OF 2009 COMMON ORDER: Since these two revisions arise out of common proceedings, they are heard together and are being disposed of by a common order. Petitioner is the defendant who seeks to assail the orders impugned in these petitions, rejecting two applications, which were filed for reopening and recalling PW.1 for cross-examination. On a reading of the affidavits filed in support of the applications and also for the reasons given by the Court below, especially in regard to the latches, it is quite apparent that the petitioner has not made out any sufficient plea warranting such an exercise to recall PW.1 for cross-examination, except making a bald allegation that due to lack of knowledge the same could not be exercised, which is not a ground as such to seek such indulgence. In view of the aforesaid reasons, there are no grounds warranting interference of this Court. Accordingly, Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J 28.08.2009 MD/TSY