IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5442 of 2011 ANUP KUMAR SHAHI, S/O Shankar Pd. Shahi, R/O Bela Chapra, P.O. M.I.C. Bela, District Muzaffarpur. ……….Petitioner Versus 1.THE UNION OF INDIA through the Secretary, Govt. of India, Ministry of Communication Department of Postal, New Delhi-cum-The Director General Department of Posts, New Delhi, Dak Bhawan - 110001. 2.THE CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL, Bihar Circle, Patna – 800001. 3.THE POSTMASTER GENERAL, Northern Region, Muzaffarpur. 4.THE DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNT (Postal), Exhibition Road, Patna. 5.THE SR. ACCOUNT OFFICER, POSTAL DEPARTMENT, Account Office, Patna, Exhibition Road, Patna. 6.THE SUPERINTENDENT, Postal Store Depot, Muzaffarpur – 842001 (Bihar). ………Respondents/Opposite Parties For the Petitioner :- Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Union of India :- Mr. Shiv Kumar, C.G.C. ----------- 02/- 01/04/2011 The present C.W.J.C. No. 5442 of 2011 is filed in view of the orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, order dated 18.01.2011 in the O.A. Case No. 107/2010. The said application was filed by the petitioner herein claiming retirement of dues on the death of one Chandeshwar Pd. Shahi, who died issueless and according to the petitioner he and his sister being the nephew and niece nominated in the service book, they are entitled of the receipt of the retirement benefits. The tribunal having gone into the merits of the case directed the respondent no. 6 (Superintendent, Postal Store Depot, Muzaffarpur) to disclose the amount payable under the head CGEGIS to the applicant without further delay and thereafter directed the petitioner to obtain succession certificate and to file the same before the respondent no.6 who will settle the claim of 2 the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that a direction may be issued to Respondent No.3 to disclose the amounts as directed by the Tribunal. Having heard learned counsel for the department we are of the opinion that the order of the tribunal can be modified and direction can be issued to respondent no.3 to disclose the amount payable under the head stated (supra) so as to enable the petitioner to obtained the succession certificate on the basis of such settlement. The respondent no.3 should settle the claim of the petitioner within the period specified by the tribunal. With the aforesaid modification, this Writ application stands disposed of. Rajeev/Praveen (T. Meena Kumari, J.) ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)