IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 230 OF 2011 SMT. CLEMENTINA REBELLO (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LR'S ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. SRIKRISHNA VENKATESH VERENCAR(SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LR'S ... Respondent Mr. Richard Almeida, Advocate for the petitioners. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 21st April, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. Almeida, learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge the judgment and order dated 14th January, 2011 passed by the Administrative Tribunal in Mundakar Appeal No.2/2008 by which the Tribunal has set aside the order dated 28th February, 2011 passed by the Deputy Collector, Margao and remanded the matter to the Deputy Collector for fresh decision in the light of the observations made in the judgment. The Tribunal has set aside the order passed by the Deputy Collector primarily on the ground that the order passed by the Deputy Collector was cryptic and no reasons have been given while dealing with the application for condonation of delay filed by the respondents herein. 3. Having heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners, I am of the considered opinion that no interference is warranted against the impugned order in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners would have all the opportunities to urge all the points before the Deputy Collector while opposing the application filed by the respondents. 4. In view of the above, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. Hence, the petition is dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA