'c-o Ss& tfc ^EiV^ -^- LN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. ^ f LS /2011 Petitioner: gf .&v' ..•"" ..^y/-\\l ^y' Respondents: Ramdhar Yadav S/o Shri. Bhundu Ram Yadav . Aged about 38 years Permanent Resident of Gram Bandari, PO: Bhatgaon, Tashsil: Bilaigarh, Dist: Raipur (CG) PresentlyResidingat: Gram Amlikapa, PO: Amora (Takhatpur) Tashil: Patharia Dist: Bilaspur (CG) Versus 1.-' State of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary School Education Department Raipur (CG) . ChiefExecutiveOfficer Janpad Panchayat Takhatpur Dist: Bilaspur (CG) Block Education Officer Block Takhatpur Dist: Bilaspur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 ^T^ ^-^ ^ ^tg%M§S ^ \0' HiGH COXTRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HOK'BLE MR. JUSTICB PRiriNKER DIWAKBR W.P.IS1.NO. 6113/2011 Ramdhar Yadav RESPONDBKT8 versus State ofC.G. & Others Shri Gary Miikhopadliyay, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Dy.A.G. for fhe State. WRIT PETITION UIKDER ARTICLE 226 OP THB COMSTITUTION OF IKDIA ORDBR (14.10.2011) Grievaace of the petitioner in the present petition is that fhough he is working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III siace 24th January 2011, but he has not been paid his salary. Counsel for the petitioner subiuits that on 8.8.2011 vide (Annexure P/8) the petitioner had also aiade a representation to resp, No.3 but tiU date neither fhe same has been decided nor ttie salary has beeo paul to him. He submits fhat purpose of filing this petition would be seryed if direction. is issued to the resp. No.3 to decide his pending representation. State counsel sublnits that let fhe petitioner make a fresh representation to the resp. N0.3 withia two weeks Irom today and tbe same wfll be decided by tbe authority concemed in accordance wifh law. The present petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to inake a fresh representatiou to the resp. No.3 wifhin two weeks aad ia turu. the resp. N0.3 sball decide the samc within a panod offourweeks froiu ttie date ofits receipt. It is inade clear that this coiu-t bas not expressed aay opinipn on the merits of the case and tbe authority concemed would be at liberty to decide the representation strictly ia accordance with law; Sd/- - prkiiskerDiwaker^ Judge