(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 1502 OF 1997 Bochare Chandrakant Punjaji, Age : Major, R/o. Amrutvahini Engineering Quarter, C-21, Amrutnagar, Sangamner, District : Ahmednagar. .. Petitioner. versus 1. Amrutvahini Sheti and Shikshan Vikas Sanstha, Amrutnagar, Sangamner, Dist. Ahmednagar, through its Secretary. 2. Principal, Amrutvahini Polytechnic, Amrutnagar, Sangamner, District : Ahmednagar. 3. Director of Technical Education, Aurangabad Region, Aurangabad. 4. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. Ajay S. Deshpande, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.N. Dhorde, Advocate, holding for Mr. S.K. Shinde, Advocate, for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr. V.D. Rakh, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.3 and 4. (2) ........................ W I T H WRIT PETITION NO. 1821 OF 2004 Chandrakant s/o. Punjaji Bochare, Age : 40 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. C-21, Amrut Vahini Engineering Quarter, Amrut Nagar, Sangamner, District : Ahmednagar. .. Petitioner. versus 1. Amrutvahini Sheti and Shikshan Vikas Sanstha, Amrutnagar, Sangamner, Taluka : Sangamner, District : Ahmednagar, Through its Secretary. 2. Amrutvahini Sheti and Shikshan Vikas Sanstha, Amrutnagar, Sangamner, Taluka : Sangamner, District : Ahmednagar, Through its Principal. 3. The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Department, Maharashtra State, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 4. The Director of Technical Education, Maharashtra State, 3, Mahapalika Marg, Fort, Mumbai. (3) 5. The All India Council of Technical Education, New Delhi, Through its Member Secretary, New Delhi. 6. The Joint Director of Technical Education, P.B. No. 2/9, Samangaon Road, Govt. Polytechnic Campus, Nasik - 422 101. .. Respondents. ........................... Mr. Ajay S. Deshpande, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.N. Dhorde, Advocate, for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr. V.D. Rakh, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos. 3, 4 and 6. Mr. D.A. Karnik, Advocate, instructed by Mr. Vivek Dhage, Advocate, for respondent no.5. ............................ CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 1ST JULY 2010 COURT'S ORDER : 1. The petitioner has filed a Purshis, that he does not want to prosecute the petitions. Since the petitioner does not want to (4) prosecute the petitions, the petitions stand disposed of, as withdrawn. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) ( B.R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp1502etc