IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25696 of 2011 Raju Panadidya @ Raju Pawariya Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 03.08.2011 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP. This case relate d to Kotwali P.S.Case No. 339 of 2010 registered for offence u/s302/34IPC and 27 of the Arms Act. According to the FIR it appears that the informant was not an eye witness to the occurrence and the statement she has made against the petitioner is on the basis of suspicion only. In the FIR she has stated that her husband was working at Maner and on 3rd December 2010 she had received information that he had reached to the town and soon he will be coming home. At about 7:00 P.M she received information that her husband has been killed. All the statements she has made on the basis of previous enmity. It will be relevant to state that other 4 accused persons, namely, Bhola Mian and Umesh @ Umesh Prasad and Md. Shamshad have been granted bail by this Court vide Cr.Misc.Nos.10997 of 2011. & 16816 of 2011 and. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner Raju Panadiya @ Raju Pawariya is admitted to bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Kotwali P.S.Case No. 339 of 2010. Jay/ (Shivaji Pandey, J) 2