IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 14th day of May, 2008 First Bail Application No. 443 of 2008 Criminal Side Sanjay S/o Ramprasad. ……. Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ……. Opposite Party _________________________________________________________ Arising out of Crime No. 246 of 2007 Under Sections: 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. P.S.: Kotwali Roorkee District: Haridwar. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Mr. Mohd. Azim, learned counsel for the applicant/ petitioner and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent State. 2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Government Advocate does not want to file any reply. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I feel it is a fit case, where the petitioner should be released on bail. The application accordingly is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bail bond with on surety, in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I feel it is a fit case, where the petitioner should be released on bail. The application accordingly is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bail bond with one surety, in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 14.05.2008 G