IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9297 of 2008. Decided on: 13.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Pawan Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): It is not disputed by the learned counsel for the parties that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Nek Ram and others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, CWP(T) No.14232, decided on 17.11.2009. 2. Consequently, the petition is allowed. Respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner in view of the principles laid down by this Court in Nek Ram’s case (supra), within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 13, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?