y,^ :K^ stvgl^^ggE] J;|:H*-iii-E. • Ufci'iW <?.)—1^0-0 IN T«EHIGH COURT OF CHaATTtSGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION rS1NO. "71^3 /2006 PETITIONER ^^ .*•***' .^.^-"^tf<'^x?y'" '.'<''' -.•ie*''''1 \'^i^"" .pff--" ..*•'' Dwarika Das Anant S/o late Kanhaiya \-^. ..••(•'"-^ Lal Anant, aged about 45 years, R/o ^••"Q!^ Chaklakunda, Tahsil- Navagarh, DistrictDurg [C.G.]. ^ &*'s&RfiSPQNDENTS .•'-'-! 5^^.^ ^w^'' w^" 'y .dl ?>, /' ^^ VERSUS , 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Revenue Departmerit, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.] /2] Sub divisional Officer [Revenue], Patan, District Durg [C.G.]. 3] Tahsildar, Patan, District Durg [C.G.]. ^' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \',^ !;*"t r ^ariM iT 131 !CH ^_ HON'BLEJWR. SAT'SH K. Petitioner n*t IT PETiTION SS.) N0.7153 OF Dwarika Das Anant versus Stats of Chhattisgarh and others 'resent : Ms. Sushma Chandei, counsel for the petlti Mr. Sushi! Dubsy, Go'/ernment Advocate h State/respondents. (Passed on 21st Day of December, 2006) Ths petitioner was working as Patwari since 1983. In the year 2001, a case for an offence punishabie under ths provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was registered against him. As a resuit, the petitioner v/as piaced under suspension by order dated 31-8- 001 (Annexure P-2). 2. The petitioner has impugned the suspension order on the ground that the petlfioner is not previded sufficient and proper subsistence aliowance. The impugned order dated 31-8-2001 (Annexure P-2) makes it c!ear that the petitioner w'ouid be entitlsd to subsistence alSov/ance not sufficient silowsnce. Th® petitioner is entltled to only sisbsistence aiiov/ance not sufficient or proper aliowance is prayed for by the petitionsr. There is no other ground to challenge the suspenslon order. 3. dlsmi The petifion is devoid of merit. Thus, the pstition is No order as to costs. — —- - Sd/- Satish K. Ag Judge Gcpsi