bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. CRI. CRI. REVN APPLICATION NO. 607 OF 2008 REVN APPLICATION NO. 607 OF 2008 REVN APPLICATION NO. 607 OF 2008 Arun Gangadhar Korde ... Applicant v/s The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.S.P.Dharmadhikari for the applicant. Ms.A.T.Zaveri, A.P.P. for the respondent State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.V. POTDAR, J. A.V. POTDAR, J. A.V. POTDAR, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 13TH FEBRUARY, 2009 13TH FEBRUARY, 2009 13TH FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. Heard 2. By the present criminal revision application, the original accused No.3 who is the present accused No.2, has challenged the charge framed by the learned Special Judge, (Anti-Corruption), Greater Bombay, in A.C.B. Case No.44 of 1990, dated 3.10.2008. 3. Today, when the revision application came up for final hearing, it is informed across the bar that, now the learned Special Judge has commenced the trial and the first witness is in the witness box. In the premises, already delayed trial of 19 years will further 2 cause delay if the record and proceedings to be called in this Court. Secondly, if the trial has already commenced, then there is no propriety to decide the discharge application because that application is to be heard in the trial Court alongwith the submissions under Section 226 and the submissions for discharge under Chapter 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 4. In view of the above, the revision application becomes infructuous and therefore stands dismissed.