IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35923 of 2009 SUNIL SINGH S/O UDAY BAHADUR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.11.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that initially two first information reports were instituted for the same occurrence by the informant, but police after investigation submitted final form and recommended action under Section 182 and 211 I.P.C. in which cognizance has also been taken. In the mean while the present protest petition- cum- complaint was filed in which cognizance has been taken. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 24.8.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Complaint Case No.C-521 of 2006, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the 2 petitioner, and (ii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )