THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 829 OF 2003 Dated: 14.11.2011 Between : Smt. Singadala Ramanamma and 6 others … Petitioners And The District Collector and 4 others … Respondents The Court made the following:- THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 829 OF 2003 ORDER: It is brought to my notice by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the identical notice dated 25.09.2002 issued by the 5th respondent herein was challenged in Writ Petition No.19506 of 2002 and this Court after hearing both the parties, disposed of the said writ petition by order dated 04.07.2003 observing as under: “The matter was heard finally with the consent of both the counsel. It is not denied that the petitioners license expired on 31.3.2002 and that they have not made applications for renewal as on the date of filing of the writ petitions. The learned counsel for the petitioners however submits that all the petitioners approached the 3rd respondent and made applications under Section 127 of the Act subsequently for renewal of their licenses. If that be so, the respondents have to consider their applications for renewal of licenses keeping in view the orders passed by this Court on in WPMP No.24493 of 2002 dated 07.10.2002. It is further made clear that if the petitioners have encroached upon the road margin, their applications for renewal of licenses, as observed by this Court shall be considered only after removal of encroachments. It is also open to the 3rd respondent to take necessary steps as per law if the petitioners carryon the business without license. The writ petition with the above observations is disposed of. No costs.” Since the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the said order, the Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the above observations made by this Court in Writ Petition No.19506 of 2002. No costs. ___________ Date: 14.11.2011 G. ROHINI, J