HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARI-i AT BLASPUR M I Pe’ri’rioner Tarachand Choudhari, /o Shri Bihur‘i Lal Coudhari, aged abou’r 54 years, Assisfanf Teacher, Governmem‘ Primar School, Bhaunipur, Block- Lailga., Disricf‘ Raigar'h (C Respondent 1. Stafe of Chhaf’risgar‘h, Through Secretory, h y w un t .G.) Versus s Educa’ron Departmen D.K.. Bawan, Roipur C.G.) 2. Distric’r Educafion Officer, Raigar'h, Disfric’r~ Raigar‘h (C.G.) 3. Block Eucoh'on Officer, Lailunga, Disfricf — Roigarh (6.6.) SB: Hon’bie M r. Jus’rice 5a+ish K. Ai gnihori, J Shri Anil Mourya, Advocate for The pTifiner, Miss §uni+a ain, Panel Lawyer for ihe respondenis. (Passed on this 7*“ Day of June, 2008) Wifh fhe consen? of learned couel appearing for the par‘ries, fhe ma‘ffer is hea finally. rd . Learned counsel appearing for re pe‘ri‘ioner sumifs Thaf fhe ’h i b e‘ifiner was appoin‘red as Depuf Teache i The year 1973 on fixed pay of Rs. 100/—. Affer completion of probation period, the petitioner was granted regular pay scale. He further submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. W. P45! No. 2917 of 2008 S i t S h ( d eo J ORAL ORDER 1 . ns pio y r n \ .._ Q), . The issue involved, herein was considered by The Madhya Pradesh STaTe Adminis’rr‘afive Tribunal, Jabalpur' in O.A. No. 2745/89- (Madhukanf Yadu and 5'6 whers Vs. Sta‘re of MP. (St oTheJ's), wherein if was held fha’r The similar'|y sifua‘red ’reachers are em‘h‘led To regular pay scale w.e.f. The da're of ini’rial appoim‘men’r. The ma’rfer was Taken-up fo fhe Hon'ble Supreme Court The appeal was dismissed by The Hon’ble Supreme Courf upholding fhe decision of ‘rhe Tribunal To The effecT Tha‘r The Teachers/AssisTanT Teachers are enTiTled To regular pay scale from The daTe of 'iniTial appoinTmenT. . In view of The above STaTe submissions made by learned counsel for The parTies, The wriT peTiTion is disposed of in The same Terms i.e., The peTiTioner is granTed liberTy To make a represenTaTion; if so advised, To consider his case, if he sTands on The same fooTings, as per The order daTed 24.8.1992 passed by The Madhya Pradesh STaTe AdminisTraTive' Tribunal, Jabalpur, in O.A.No. 2745 of 89 (MadhukanT Yadu) (supra) and subsequenfly confirmed by The order daTed 3.1.1994 passed’by The Hon'ble Supreme CourT in Special Leave PeTiTion (Civil) No. 6892/93 and granT relief accordingly. . In view of The foregoing, The peTiTion is disposed of. No order asTo cosTs. Satish K. Agnihotri , Judge r W sw- Thakur