1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4741/2007 Rewant Singh Rajput vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 23.1.2008 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.SP Sharma,for the petitioner. Mr.SN Tiwari,Dy. Ga. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner's services were terminated as back as on 25th July, 1991. That action of the respondents was challenged by the petitioner by preferring SBCWP No.3361/1991. That writ petition was preferred by several employees and petitioner withdrew from that writ petition to prefer another writ petition. Then petitioner preferred another writ petition no.1982/1992. In view of the order passed in the said writ petition of the petitioner, the petitioner and other persons joined the services again on 1st Oct., 1992. It is after 25 days,the respondents passed another order by which services of the petitioner was again terminated. The writ petition No.1982/1992 filed by the petitioner was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 16th May, 1997. It appears from the order dated 16th May, 1997 that the petitioner projected that there is a report in favour of the employees including the petitioner 2 whereas in fact, no such report was filed in the court in the said writ petition no.1982/1992. The employer also shows their ignorance about any such report. However, this Court observed that if such report is brought to the notice of the respondent by the petitioner alongwith the representation then they will consider the representation and will pass appropriate order on merits of the representation. Despite this order dated 16th May, 1997, the petitioner submitted the representation for the first time in the year 2005 after 8 years before the employer and now he has filed the present writ petition for getting the employment. I do not find that in such circumstances, when the petitioner was given opportunity to make representation in the year 1997 he could have submit representation in the year 2005 so as to create a cause of action for filing writ petition in the year 2007. Hence, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.Goyal/-