-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 439 OF 2007 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 439 OF 2007 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 439 OF 2007 ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 314 OF 2009 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 314 OF 2009 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 314 OF 2009 Chandiwala Enterprises .. Appellant. V/s. 1. Shantilal K. Somaiya & Ors. .. Respondents. --- Mr. R.A.Thorat & P.J.Thorat for the Appellant. Mr. L.V.Bommer i/by M/s. Shaunak Satpute & Co. for the Respondent nos. 1 to 11. Mr.Ahmed Sayed & Ms. Asmitha Poojari i/by M/s. Consult Legal for the Respondent Nos. 12, 14,15 and 16. Ms. Mamta Sodh i/by M/s. Zohair & Co. for Respondent nos. 22 and 23. Mr.S.V. More, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 19 to 21. --- CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 13th APRIL, 2009 DATED : 13th APRIL, 2009 DATED : 13th APRIL, 2009 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. 2. Mr. Thorat, the learned counsel does not press the A.O. and seeks leave to withdraw the same. He, however, requests for expeditious hearing of the S.C.Suit No. 804 of 2007, pending before the City Civil Court at -: 2 :- Bombay. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection for expeditious hearing of the suit. 4. In the facts and circumstances mentioned above and looking in to the nature of controversy involved in the suit, the trial court, namely, the City Civil Court at Bombay is directed to dispose of the said suit being S.C. Suit No. 804 of 2007 as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt of the writ of this order. The learned counsels appearing for the respective parties undertake that they will co-operate for expeditious hearing of the suit. 5. Needless to mention that the trial court shall dispose of the above suit independently on its own merit, uninfluenced of the impugned order. 6. In view of the withdrawal of the A.O, the civil application does not survive and the same is also disposed of as such. (R.V.MORE,J.) .....