IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7404 of 2007 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY REGIONAL OFFICE 4TH FLOOR SONE BHAWAN BIRCHAND PATEL ROAD, DISTRICT PATNA THROUGH ITS DULY CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY ANJANI KUMAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OFFICER ROHTAS AT SASARAM., 3. BIMLA DEVI WIFE OF LAGTE RAM CHANDRA YADAV 4. SHAMAWA DEVI WIFE OF HARIHAR YADAV 5. HARIHAR YADAV SON OF RAMAN YADAV ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE MAHULIYA, P.S. SAIDPUR DISTRICT GAZIPUR UTTAR PRADESH. 6. ANIL KUMAR SINGH SONOF SURESH SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PARASANI, P.O. MAHPUR, PS.. SAIDPUR, DISTRICT GAZIPUR (U.P.) ----------- 2 16/02/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for private respondent nos. 3 and 4. The question of law which has been raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not required to be answered at this stage. May be, in appropriate case at an appropriate proceeding some day this question may have to be answered. As of now from perusal of annexure-1 it is apparent that it is only a notice which has been issued by the Certificate Officer to the petitioner since at the relevant time the money calculated on the basis of the award had not been paid to the private respondent nos. 3 and 4 by the petitioner - 2 - Company. This writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner that it can file its objection under section 9 of the Public Demand Recovery Act before the Certificate Officer and urge all such points which are available in its defence and after adjudication of the objection under section 9 of the Act, follow up action will be taken by the Certificate Officer. AMIN (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)