IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7543 of 2011 MUSMAT MANJU KUANR, aged 63 years widow of Late Surynath Singh, Resident of Village & P.O.- Hurka, P.S.- Tilauthu, District-Rohtas. ……….. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Water Resources Department, Sinchai Bhawan, Patna. 2. The Director, Provident Fund Directorate, Pant Bhawan, Patna. 3. The District Provident Fund Officer, Sasaram, District – Rohtas. 4. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Dehri, District- Rohtas. 5. The Superintending Engineer, Sone Modernisation Circle, Dehri, District – Rohtas. 6. The Executive Engineer, Sone Barrage Division, Indrapuri, District – Rohtas. 7. The District Magistrate, Rohtas (Pension Cell) at Sasaram. 8. The Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Patna. ……….. Respondents ----------- 2 29.04.2011 Heard the parties. The present writ petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondents to release the remaining amount of G.P.F. of the husband of the petitioner alongwith prevailing rate of interest and also for a direction to revise the pensionary benefits of the husband of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to „Annexure-2‟ to the writ petition which is a communication issued by the Executive Engineer, Sone 2 Barrage Division, Indrapuri, District – Rohtas, which was issued under the Right to Information Act, whereby, it was intimated that due to non-availability of allotment payment was not being done in favour of the petitioner. The husband of the petitioner retired as “Supervisor Grade-2” under Executive Engineer, Sone Barrage Division, Indrapuri, District-Rohtas on 31.01.2005, and subsequently, on 17.08.2005, he died. It has been submitted that despite the fact that husband of the petitioner died long back still aforesaid dues have not been cleared. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has filed representation before the authority concerned, however, till date no decision has been taken. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that this writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned. In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file representation before 3 respondent nos. 1/Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Water Resources Department, Patna, 3/District Provident Fund Officer, Sasaram & 8/Accountant General, Bihar, within a period of six weeks. If such representation is filed, it is expected, that aforesaid respondents will examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. Even in case of refusal, aforesaid respondents are required to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. With above observation and direction the writ petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)