HIGH COURT OF CHHATI‘ISGARH A BILASPUR L N T f Bhaf 5 T g , _ Versus Respodents 1. Sfa‘re of Chhaffisgarh, Through Secr'rary, Education Depor‘rmen‘r, D.K.$. Bhawn Raipur (C.6.) . Dis’rricT Eucation ficer, Raigar, Distric‘f- Raigarh.(C.G.) 7 3. Block Educafion Office, Lailnga, Disfcf - aigh (ca) ' Pe’ri‘rioner' Bhagira‘rhi PaeL S/o Shri ag Ram PafeL aged abouf 3 years, Assisfan'r eacher, Governmen’r Primary School, Junadih, Lailuna, Block- Lailunga Disfr‘icf - Raiga‘rh (6.6.) n e a, d Of h r u ri Rar SB: Hon'ble Mr. Jusfice Safish K. Agnihofri, J' Shri Anil Mourya, Advocae for fhe pefi’roner. Ms Suni’ra Jan, Panel Lawyer for The respondems. (Passed on +his 17*“ Day of June, 8) Wifh Th conn’r of learned counsel ppearing r The paries, he . e se a fo T T ma‘l‘Ter is ard filly. he na . Learned counsel appearing for The peTiTioner submiTs ThaT The peTiTioner'was appoTed as Depuy Teacher in The year 74 on fixed in T 19 py of Rs. 100/—. AfTer compleTion of probafion perio, fhe peTiTI‘oner a d was granTed regular pay scale. He fur’Ther submiTs ThaT The issue involved in The case is asTo wheTher The peTiTioner is enTiTled To regular pay scale w.e.f. The daTe of iniTial appoinfmenT or afTer complefion of probafion period. w. P45) No. 2§16 of 2003 f i is i ‘ ORAL ORDER 200 .. 2,/ . ’ 3‘ Te ise involved, herein was considered b The adhya radesh STTe h su y M P a Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpr n O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukan’r u i Yadu and 5 ofhers Vs. S’ra’re of M.P. & ofhers), wherein if was held 6 That The simiarly sifua’red feache are en’rifled To regula pay scale w.e.f. The daTe of iniTial appinTmeT.‘ he maTer was Taken-up To The on T T Hon'ble Supre CourT. e appeal was dismissed by The Hon’ble em Th upreme urT uplding The decision of The Tribunal o The effecT S Co ho T ThaT Te h Teacers/AssisTanT h Teachers are enTiTled To ru eglar pay scale from The dae of iniTial appoinTmenT. T 4. In vi of The above sTaTe submissions ade by leared counsel for The ew m n parTies, The wriT peTiTion is disposed of The same Term i.e., The in s peTiTioner s granTed liberTy To make a represenTaTion, if so avised, To i d consider his cas, if he sTands on The same fooTings, as per T order e he daTed 24.8.19 passed by The Madhya Pdesh STaTe AdminisTraTive 92 ra Tribunal, Jbalpur, in O.A.No. 2745 of‘ 9 (MadhukanT Yadu) (supra) and a 8 or pad y subsequenTly confirmed by The rde daTed 3.1.1994 sse b The Hon‘ble Suprme CourT in Special Lave PeTiTion (Civil) No. 62/9 and e e 893 granT relief accordingly. 5. In view of The foregoing, The peTiTion is disposed of. No order asTo cosTs. Satish K. Agnihotri a Judge Sd/- Thakur l rs r