IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 10379 of 2009 Between: Karri Srinivas S/o.Karri Satyam R/o.1-13-32, Kondayapalem Village, Kakinada, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent of Police, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 2 The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 3 The Station House Officer, Sarpavaram P.S., Kakinada, East Godavari District. 4 The Collector, East Godavari District, Kakinada. 5 The Revenue Divisional Officer, East Godavari District, Kakinada. 6 The Tehsildar, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 7 Smt.Y.Aruna W/o.Y.Vijaya Kumar R/o.Bendupudi Village, Tondangi Mandal, East Godavari District. 8 Y.Vijay Kumar R/o.Bendupudi Village, Tondangi Mandal, East Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction and more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that inaction of Respondents 1 to 6 by not initiating an enquiry and taking action against Respondents 7 & 8 as illegal against law and by issuing directions to Respondents 1 to 6 to consider the representation dated 1.5.2009 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.R.A.ACHUTHANAND Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO Writ Petition No.10379 of 2009 ORDER : Heard Sri Achuthanand, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home, who represented the respondents 1 to 6 and at their request the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for disposal. The petitioner herein claiming to be the absolute owner of the land admeasuring Ac.2.98 cents in R.S. No.144/2 situate at Ramanayyapeta Village of Kakinada, East Godavari District, filed this Writ Petition inter alia complaining the inaction on the part of the respondents 1 to 6 in taking action against respondents 7 & 8 in pursuant to the various representations filed by the petitioner, including the representation dated 01-05-2009. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondents 1 to 6 are very much active in making investigations in pursuant to the representations filed by the respondents 7 and 8, where as they are not taking any action on the representations filed by the petitioner. Thus, there is discrimination and also a partisan attitude on the part of the respondents 1 to 6 in conducting fair and proper enquiry to find out the truth. Hence, the Writ Petition. Having heard the counsel and on perusal of the record, it is clear that though there are various petitions and counter-petitions by the petitioner as well as respondents 7 and 8, the respondents 1 to 6 are taking up the representations filed by the respondents 7 and 8 only for enquiry and no action is being taken up on the representations filed by the petitioner. On the face of it, the action of the respondents 1 to 6 is not just, proper and sustainable. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, respondents 1 to 6 are directed to take up all representations, complaints or any grievance made by the petitioner as well as the respondents 7 and 8 and make a comprehensive enquiry and take proper action as contemplated under law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J. 21st May, 2009. Note : Issue C.C. in two days. B/O skmr