IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 8 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 12/11/2008 in WP NO : 24721 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Smt.R.Lingamma W/o.Late Yedukondalu R/o.Sandhya Hotel Jaggaiahpet, Krishna District. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Sub-Registrar, Jaggaiahpet, Krishna District. 2 R.Nageswara Rao S/o.Late R.Venkata Narsaiah R/o.Backside Geetanjali Studio, Vijayawada Road, Jaggaiahpet. Krishna District. 3 R.Jaganmohan Rao S/o.Late R.Venkata Narsaiah R/o.Ajantha Hotel, Jaggaiahpet. Krishna District. 4 Smt.R.Alivelumanga Tayaru W/o.Sri R.Jaganmohan Rao R/o.Ajantha Hotel, Jaggaiahpet. Krishna District. 5 P.Nageswara Rao Gupta S/o.Sri P.Subba Rao Flat No.1, R.K. Towers, Brahman Street, Vijayawada. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: SRIMOHD.GULAM RASOOL Counsel for the RespondentS:GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 8 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy) This writ appeal is filed against order, dated 12.11.2008 in WP No.24721 of 2008, whereby the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant. There is a dispute regarding an extent of Ac.1.68 guntas in R.S.No.338 situated in Jaggaiahpet, Krishna District. The appellant filed O.S.No.152 of 2006 for partition. In the said suit, she filed I.A.No.315 of 2006 for injunction restraining the defendants therein from alienating the property. While the said suit and I.A. are pending, the appellant filed WP No.24721 of 2008 for a writ of mandamus to direct respondent No.1 not to register the property, which is subject matter of the suit. The learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition by observing that the provisions of Section 22-A of the Registration Act are not attracted and at any rate, if the documents are registered, the appellant can avail the remedies before the competent Civil Court. Having heard Sri Mohd. Gulam Rasool, learned Counsel for the appellant, we are of the view that the learned single Judge has not committed any error warranting our interference. Even according to the appellant, she has filed I.A.No.315 of 2006 in O.S.No.152 of 2006 for injunction. Nothing prevents the appellant from persuading that application. Having already initiated a proceeding in respect of the same property, the appellant is not permitted to avail a parallel remedy by filing the writ petition. The writ appeal is therefore dismissed with liberty to the appellant to pursue pending suit and the injunction application. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari _____________________________ Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Dated: 13.2.2009 Nn. THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 8 of 2009 (Judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy) 13.2.2009