1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5193 /2010 (Saraswati Gramin Sanstha vs. Deputy Director of Education and another) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : D.D.SINHA & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ DATED : 25th April, 2011. Heard Mr. A.C.Dharmadhikari, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mrs.Rashi Deshpande, learned AGP for respondents 1 and 2; Mr R M Pande, for respondent no. 3 and Mr B G Kulkarni, for respondents 4 to 11. This petition is directed against the communication dated 13.10.2010 issued by the Education Officer to the petitioner-Sanstha. The facts are that the approval granted to respondents 3 to 11 came to be canceled by the Education Officer. Since the order of cancellation was considered to be not according to law, some enquiry was conducted by the Director of Education and it was noticed that the order of rejection of approval/cancellation of approval, was not in accordance with law. Be that as it may; it is not in dispute that after the revocation of the approval, the petitioner--Sanstha has terminated the services of the respondent nos. 3 to 11 and they have filed Appeals before the Tribunal which are 2 pending for decision. This Court has already granted interim stay in terms of prayer clause (B) and stayed the effect and operation of the impugned order/ communication dated 13.10.2010. In the circumstances, it will be appropriate to direct the Tribunal to decide the appeals filed by respondents 3 to 11 as early as possible and in any case not beyond three months from the date of communication of this order. The interim stay granted by this Court shall continue to operate till then and the impugned communication dated 13.10.2010 shall merge in the final order passed by the Tribunal in those appeals. With the above directions, Writ Petition is disposed of. All issues raised in the petition are kept open. JUDGE JUDGE sahare