1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2047 OF 2010 (Natthu Atmaram Padlewar vs. The Nagpur Roman Catholik Diocesan Corporation (P) Ltd. & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. APRIL 28, 2010. Heard Shri Naik, learned counsel for the petitioner. After some arguments, Shri Naik, learned counsel fairly states that the petitioner has no objection insofar as exhibition of document at Sr. No. 2 with list Exh. 25. He, however, contends that the trial Court is mechanically exhibiting the documents merely because they have been earlier verified. His contention is when originals produced by witness, who is to be cross examined, are different from the verified copies on record, the process of verification itself is shown to be incorrect and unacceptable. Hence, according to him, the verification needs to be ignored and the document needs to be proved again on the strength of original so produced by the witness. The position explained by Shri Naik, learned counsel in his arguments is very clear. There is nothing before this Court to hold that the trial Court may not accept this position if these facts surface before it. 2 I, therefore, find anxiety expressed by Shri Naik, learned counsel, misconceived and in any case premature at this stage. Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.