IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 105 of 2006 (S/B) Dr. Jiwanti Bisht. ..……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttaranchal & others. ...………. Respondents. Mr. Alok Mehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.C. Bisht, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Advocate for the Intervener. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that the petitioner has died, and as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 01.06.2010 01.06.2010 G