IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE d‘H—IATTI$QARH AT BILASPUR w.P N088@/2003 / PETITION UNDER ARTIQE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ‘1 n PETITIONER: ' Johit Ram Chauhan S/o Late Sri c R Chouhan R/o New Shanti Nagar, / RAIPUR-WTTISGARH Behind $hankar Niwas, y I m}. M : VERSUS: .4", RESPONDENTs- 09,..MfaQ‘ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Jig?" (94"?Qf‘ ' ‘ Through: Its Secretary, Home Department, w %" ‘\~ ‘Y% 09 .é ¢ Mantralay D K S Bhawan, RAIPUR-CHHATTISGARH W Inspector General of Prisrlons ‘ Office of Inspector General Pris ions , RAIPUR~CHHATTISGARH V XI—HC-22 '28. 11.2003 Petitioner by Shri Vinod D :shmukh, Advocate. Shri Sanjay K. Agarwal, Deputy Advocate General takes notice 011 behalf of the Respondents. ' Heard. By this wu't petition under Article 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to (hallenge the order dated 1. 11.2003 (AnnexureP/ 1) passed by the Respondent No.2 by which the petitioner is to retire W.e.f. 30th D ovember, 2003 on attaining the age of 60 years. The case of the petitioner is that. he was appointed as Black Smith Instructor on temporary basis on 5. 10. 1962 in Distm'c‘t Jail, Class-l, Rewa. Thereafter 11c: was connrmed on the said post on / . 15.10.1967. At present the petLtioner is working as’ Instructor in Rules every Govt. Teacher is to retire from service on the aftert 0011 of the last working day of the . month in which he attains the age of sixty two (62) years and for the purposye‘of this Rule ‘Teacherf means a Govt. sewant by Whatever designation called, appointed for the purpose of teaching in Govt. Educational Institutions, including Technical or Medical Education Institutions, therefore the impugned order is contrary to the Govt. Central Jail, Raipur. As per the 3m m (,. P. - 3830/3 m ...................................W 200 ...........................................m .............................................. WW %€}IW Wm Rules. 16 petitioner’s case al Teacher thei‘efom the actio o have haard lemd coun Learned cnsel for the p has mads a represexltation 12.9,2003 but no dacision has be taken 0n that representation by en the Respondent N,2 therefore make a ntsh representation be e the Repondent N02 to which f 1 e leane Deputy Advocate Genera has no objection. d l Having heard leaned c sel for the parties and having o n regard to the facts an oircum lowed o make a detailed repr raising ll his griences within the Responden No.2 ill decid 3O days from the ae of receipt nner considering all the griev reasone order. this petion is disposed of iinaliy. With the aboe ohservation under The. definition of the Govt. ; respond€nts i$ arbitrary. a 1 for th€ 1363. e % titionm‘ submits that m6 petitionar foe T R6sp0ndent No.2 on t e petitioner ay be allnwed t0 th m d sl al t e a va z t w e dt c ma e d i ti v : Parties are entitled for ceriii ces of the caee the petitioner is sentam'on to the Respondent No.2 period of 10 days from today and i the reprsentation Within another e f the representation in an objective nees of the petitioner by passing a d/- L.c.BHAD00 Judge ied copy of this order. S 2 w 0 m . .. ... .. $ T1 fk n f th I an s ou 6 ’er he o