1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30/06/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN Writ Petition (MD) No.6372 of 2011 R.Kalidass ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Block Development Officer Commissioner Ramanathapuram Panchayat Union, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The President Soorenkottai Panchayat Board, Ramanathapuram Panchayat Union, Ramanathapuram District. 4.S.Stalin ...Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pursuant to the impugned order passed by the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.1/2011 dated 31.05.2011 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents 2 and 3 to post the petitioner as panchayat assistant in any one of the vacant place in Ramanathapuram Panchayat Union Ramanathapuram District based on the proceedings of the first respondent in his proceedings A3/4322/2009 dated 23.03.2010. For petitioner ...Mr.D.Srinivasa Ragavan For Respondents ...Mr.B.Pugalendhi Spl. Government Pleader O R D E R Challenging the impugned order of the third respondent dated 31.05.2011 relieving the petitioner from the post of Panchayat Assistant, the present writ petition is laid. 2. On notice, the learned Special Government Pleader reports that the first respondent, District Collector of Ramanathapuram, has already communicated a letter to the Block Development Officer, Ramanathapuram Panchayat Union, the second respondent herein, to accommodate the petitioner in any of the panchayat union within his jurisdiction. Thereupon, the Block Development Officer, the second respondent herein, has reported to the first respondent that there are no vacancy in his panchayat union. However, it is reported by the learned Special Government pleader that there is a vacancy in Landhai Panchayat. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. In view of the above stated position, there would not be any difficulty to accommodate the petitioner in the said vacancy, in view of the proposal of the first respondent. Hence, I am inclined to pass the following order: The petitioner shall be accommodated in the Landhai Panchayat and the said exercise has to be carried out by the respondents within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (T&P) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar RR 1.The District Collector Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Block Development Officer Commissioner Ramanathapuram Panchayat Union, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The President Soorenkottai Panchayat Board, Ramanathapuram Panchayat Union, Ramanathapuram District. +1cc to Special Government Pleade, SR.No.21151 GH : 12.07.2011 : 2p/5c W.P.(MD) No.6372 of 2011 30.06.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/