IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10228 of 2011-C & connected matters. Decided on: December 5, 2011. 1. CWP No. 10228 of 2011-C. Ajay Kumar. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP No. 10253 of 2011-F. Yadu Bala. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. 3. CWP No. 10264 of 2011. Surender Kumari. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. 4. CWP No. 10265 of 2011-G. Anita Devi. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. 5. CWP No. 10286 of 2011-I. Sunil Dutt Sharma. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. 6. CWP No. 10287 of 2011-I. Balwant Singh Khalasta. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. 7. CWP No. 10320 of 2011-B. Lekh Raj. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. 8. CWP No. 10362 of 2011-G. Reenu Johari. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. 9. CWP No. 10388 of 2011-I. Ravinder Kumar & ors. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. 10. CWP No. 10406 of 2011-A. Dinesh Kumar. Vrs. State of H.P. & ors. 11. CWP No. 10407 of 2011-A. Babita Kumari & anr. Vrs. State of H.P. & anr. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.D. Sud, Judge. For the petitioners: M/S Neel Kamal Sharma, Ashok Chaudhary, Vishal Panwar, Vikas Bhardwaj, Rajesh Kumar, Rakesh Kumar Bansal, Devinder Chauhan Jaita and Rakesh Thakur, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) This issue pertaining to vacation salary to contract teachers is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 415 of 2000, titled as Baldev Singh versus State of H.P. & Others, and the judgment has become final. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondents to release the due and admissible vacation salary, during the entire service period, to the petitioners in case the same has not been granted so far, within a period of four months from the date of production of the copy of this 2 judgment alongwith a copy of the Writ Petition(s) and the copy of the judgment, referred to above. If the amounts are not disbursed as above, the petitioners will be entitled to interest @ 10% and the officers responsible for the delay shall be personally liable for the same. 2. The Writ Petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. December 5, 2011, ( Justice D.D. Sud), (karan/vs) Judge.