CRM-M-22230-2011 (O&M) [ 1 ] ::::::: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22230-2011 (O&M) Date of decision:25.07.2011. Mandeep Kaur and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Sandeep S. Majithia, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This is a petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners or in the alternative 10 days' notice by respondent No.2 to 4 so that the petitioners may approach the Court as they are apprehending registration of FIR against them at the hands of respondent No.5. It is averred by the petitioners that respondent No.5 was married to Gurshpal Singh son of petitioner Nos.4 and 5, whereas petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are the married sister-in-law and brother-in-law of respondent No.5 and petitioner No.3 is her unmarried sister-in-law who is handicapped also. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that respondent No.5 has filed a complaint before the Women Cell, Sangrur and the petitioners are afraid that they may not be implicated in the offences under Section 498-A and 406 IPC at the behest of respondent No.5 and hence, they prayed for blanket bail from this Court. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners and from the perusal of the record, I have found that the petitioners had approached the learned Court below for the same relief and on an inquiry, the Court below had found that no case has been registered against the petitioners. The order passed CRM-M-22230-2011 (O&M) [ 2 ] ::::::: by the learned Court below is precisely as under: - “Report received back from Police Station City, Malerkotla, in which it is submitted that the applicants are not required by the police nor any complaint is pending at Police Station, City, Malerkotla. Accordingly, the bail application in these circumstances being infructuous as such same is hereby dismissed. Bail paper be consigned to the record room.” I do not find any error in the approach of the learned Court below in dismissing the pre-arrest bail application of the petitioners and hence, the present petition is found to be without any merit and is accordingly dismissed. July 25, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE