IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3324 of 2010 1. SIKARI RAI 2. BACHA RAI 3. UMA RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 01.02.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner no. 1 is father of petitioner nos. 2 and 3. They seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse sections of Indian Penal Code including Section 379 IPC as also diverse sections of SC/ST Act. It is contended that the occurrence as per the prosecution had taken place on 2.8.2009 whereas the case has been lodged on 7.8.2009. Learned counsel submits that the informant in his statement made before the police under Section 161 Cr.P.C. has not stated about his employment with the petitioner. Referring to Annexure-2, it is submitted that the good relation have since been restored between the parties. It is further contended with reference to statement made in paragraph 6 that petitioner no. 1 is an old aged person and is suffering from different ailments. This court is persuaded to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. In the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, let petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten 2 thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Hajipur S.C./S.T. P.S. case no. 378 of 2009 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )