IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.4413 of 2010 ABDULLAH, S/O NOOR MOHAMMAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 18.02.2010 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 372, 373, 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 7(1)(A) of the I.T.P.A. Act, 1986. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the matter has been compromised between the parties, I am not inclined to enter into the merits of the case and for this reason alone the petitioner, above name, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Pakari Dayal P.S. Case No. 49 of 2008 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, on the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will 2 be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner then his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. 4. The Magistrate before releasing the petitioner will notice the informant, Reshma, D/O Md. Hadis, Sirha, P.S. Pakridayal, East Champaran, and satisfy himself that in fact there has been a compromise between the parties. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)