tlii".Sf6S E KSK€ii SINIiLt SStN^n IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0r'r:.;.../2010 PETITIONER. ^ ?^!.V fr.*°^w<?"L ^"s^ "Dr. ShivKumar Chandrakar S/o Shri Nohar Singh Chandrakar, aged about 60 years working as Assitant Aaurved Medical officr, Government Aaurvedik Hospital Bhakara Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. ' The StateofChhattisgarh through Secretary C.G. Public Helth (Indian Systems of Medicine & Homeop'athy) D. K. S . Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) /' 2. The Director Aaurved Yog Avam Prakritik Chikitsa Unani Siddha Avam Homyopathi Aaush Raipur (C.G.) / 3. The District Aaurvecl Officer Dist. Dhamatarj. (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OE' THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CEERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION ANI.'l OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIKECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERES: fU •J:~i]:..-—/G ^"^ ^Ti|i<?i4, y-aly'lio, fsl^Fiyy M.f:;.^...l'?..£!./..it2. v^s mr 1?; n"s aneai g? snt^T •q??T (ipf3a'?q) •*l<<!d<i>-1 ^lTOTi •?ft^ TJW5TC ^ ws te' SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 30-06-2010 Shri R.S. Patel, counsel Shri Sadsh Gupta, Govt advance copy. This petidon has been fi to respondent-authorities to aU of age on the premise that su1 and amendment in the retirei 11.9.2007 & 9.5.2008 (Anne; J3r the petitioner. Advocate for the State/respondents, on }ed by the petitioner seeking a direction jow the petitioner dll he attains 62 years isequently on account of policy decision hent rules as stated in Circulars dated jure P-3), case of the pedtioner is also covered. Leamed counsel for the a representation and prays th direction to consider his repre; [petitioner submits that he has preferred ^.t this petition may be disposed off with sntation. respondents is that the Circul bare reading, are not meant; Ayurvedik Medical Officer. Without commenting oij finally disposed off. It would remedy of representation. It is made clear that thid the merits of the case. On the other hand, sf-ibmission of learned counsel for the brs relied upon by the petidoner, on its to be applicable in case of Assistant the n-ierits of the case, the petition is )e open for the petitioner to pursue his Court has not expressed any opinion on Sd-/ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge li i B