1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3696 OF 2009 Mubarak Abbas Sheikh ....Applicant. V/s State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..... Respondents. Mr. Nitin Vhatkar with Jyotsna Kamble & Mary Ranbhise for the applicant. Mr. Sandeep S. Salunkhe for Respondent No.2 to 10. Mr. S.A. Shaikh, APP for the State. CORAM: V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : 9TH DECEMBER, 2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. Applicant has filed this application for cancellation of bail granted to respondent by the Sessions Court. A complaint was filed by the complainant in which it is alleged that the respondents 2 to 10 have committed an offence punishable under section 306 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal code. Respondent Nos. 2 to 10 made an application for anticipatory bail. The Sessions Court, after hearing the learned APP, by order dated 15/07/2009 was pleased to grant anticipatory bail in favour of applicants i. e. 2 respondent Nos. 2 to 10 herein. This order was challenged by the applicant herein in Criminal Application No.1074 of 2009. However, this Court (Coram: D.B. Bhosale, J.) was pleased to dismissed this application by passing a reasoned order. 3. Thereafter, respondent Nos. 2 to 10 herein, after filing of the charge-sheet, surrendered to the police and applied for regular bail before the Sessions Court which application was allowed and respondent Nos. 2 to 10 were released on regular bail. Against this order, again, the applicant has filed this application for cancellation of bail. 4. It is submitted by the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant that due to harassment by respondent Nos. 2 to 10, the complainant’s brother committed suicide. His dying declaration was recorded. It is submitted that Investigating Officer has not properly investigated the case and there are several lacunae in the investigation. It is, therefore, submitted that the bail granted to respondent Nos. 2 to 10 may be canceled. 5. It is not possible to accept the said submission. The earlier application filed by the applicant for cancellation of bail also has been rejected by this Court. Thereafter, respondent Nos. 2 to 10 herein surrendered and, after filing of the charge-sheet, again, their application for regular bail was considered and they were released on regular bail. If 3 the applicant herein has any grievance in respect of the manner in which the investigation is carried out, he may file an appropriate application in the appropriate court and that cannot be a ground for cancellation of bail. 6. Application for cancellation of bail is, therefore, rejected. (V.M. KANADE, J.)