IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42664 of 2009 BIPIN PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is in custody when Complaint Case No. 727 © of 2009 came to be instituted under sections 354 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission of learned counsel is that there is variance in the allegation made in the complaint and the statement made on S. A. The complaint has been filed after 21 days of the occurrence without any explanation for such delay which could be convincing and cogent. Petitioner is stated to be village Choukidar which is the reason that his enemy in the village has tried to fix his name in the crime. Taking the totality of the submission, let the petitioner, namely, Bipin Paswan be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R.R. Sahay, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saharsa in connection with Complaint case No. 727 © of 2009. Both the sureties to be executed by the blood relations of the petitioner on due identification by the court below. Petitioner will cooperate in the trial by appearing on each and every date fixed in the case either by himself or through his counsel and the petitioner shall not harass the complainant. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)