IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. M- 22560 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: September 15, 2011 Smt.Seema Chakarvarty and others ... Petitioners Versus State of Hayrana and another ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr.Aditya Sanghi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Satyavir Singh Yadav, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondent – State. Sunil Kumar – complainant/ respondent No.2 with Mr.Rohit Ahuja, Advocate. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) The petitioners, by filing this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have sought quashing of First Information Report (for short 'FIR) No.102 dated May 02nd, 2011 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 469, 471/120-B of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') in Police Station SGM Nagar, Faridabad. While appearing in person with his counsel, complainant – respondent No.2, namely Sunil Kumar stated at bar that he has compromised the matter with the petitioners with the intervention of the relatives and friends. Compromise-deed (Annexure P1) has been placed on record. He also states that there is no ill-will left. Indeed, the dispute between the parties was of personal nature. In view of this, there should not be any impediment in allowing the parties to compromise the matter. Support to this view can be had from the authority 'Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab' 2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) 429, wherein, Hon'ble Supreme Court has ruled that in such type of cases, where the dispute is of personal nature, Court should ordinarily, accept the compromise. In view of the above, the petition is accepted, FIR No.102 dated May 02nd, 2011 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 469, 471/120-B IPC in Police Station SGM Nagar, Faridabad and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed. September 15, 2011 ( NAWAB SINGH ) `gian'/s JUDGE