13^5^^ (^xy-:'^'^J^ ^^g3^--- y<e6*r" .,....'t-"" ^s^, ?^ ..S -^. 3 - ^_.. ^t. - „.-. — H. 'iT!'~''f? /?9'p y~ "'. ?•"-? ;?s r~i i"? I"~:: ^ri'sy ^-^i. ^t ? .;-;i^*§y£? fe^4-"' ^- l/zr^_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. r?4?-c//2010 PETITIONER Narottam Singh Argal aged about 18 years, S/o'Late Baburam Jatav, R/o Village Jatga Tahsil Podiuproda, Distt. Korba VERSUS RESPONDENTS^ 1. /"l. 3. ^-4. The State of Chhattisgarh, through' Secretary, Ministry of Health Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, D.istt. Raipur Union Of India ,through Ministry of Health an4Fainily Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi Director of Medical and Health Education, Mantralaya Premises Old • Nurse Hostel, Raipur Chhattisgarh Board Professional Education Mandal, through Controller Pensionbada, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Particular of the Petitioner :- mGH COURT OFCHHATnSGARH. BILASPUR DB: HON'BLB I.M. QUDDUSI te HON'BLE N.K. AGRAWAL, JJ W.P (Q No. 3654 of 2010 Vs. APPBARANCB: Mr. Parag Kotecha, counsel for the Petitioner. Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for fhe State/respondents 1 & 3. ORALORDEK (28.07.2010) Per X.M. OUDDT I Heard. By fhis writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of fhe Constitution of India, the petitioner manly prays for the followuig relief|[s). "10.1The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct respondent no.2 and its authorily to pemait the petitioner to appear in fhe coiinselmg of AH India Pre Medical Entrance Examination 2010 and accordingly fhe seat may be allotted. 10.2 The Hon'ble Court may kiadly be pleased to direct ffae respondent no.l, 3 & 4 aad its authority to pennit fhe petitioner to appear tn fhe coiinselmg of Chhattisgarh Pre- Medical Entrance Examination 2010 and PETmONBR Narottam Singh Argal RESPONDENTS State of Chhattfegarh and others '-••••-*^^ y%j JI w'.^ '^:, -.-.-tf-i*'1 •^-^"'^' accordingly fhe seat may be aUotted to fhe petitioner and permit him to prosecute his medical studies." The interim order was granted on 22.07.2010 as the petitioner had to appear in counseling on 23.7.2010. The caste oerti&cate of the petitioner was refused by the Sub- DMsional Officer, therefore, on 22.07.2010 the foUowing interim order was passed: "In the meaatime, on the request of learned coimsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to take appropriate steps in view of the directions issued by fhe Hon'ble Supreme Coiul in Para 12.10 of fhe judgment and order, passed in Kumccri Madhuri Patil cmd another Vs. Addl. Comnmssioner, Tribcff, Development and others (AIR 1995 SC 94). On petitioner's doing so, the concemed authonty shall consider the same and take appropriate decision, independently." Now fhe petitioncr has informed fhat hc has been permitted to appear in coui^eBag and bas been given provisional admission. The caste certificate is to be obtained and submitted by the petitioner, for which a writ petitfon is already pendu^ beitig W.P(Q. No.6895/2009. The provisioi^l admission ofthe petitioner dcpends upoa the production of caste certificate duly verified by fhe High Powered Caste Scrutiay Coimaittee. Therefore, nofhing remams to be y / '•••'w-s ..^ -I f A *%iiiB'°^'~1j 3 /.s <s^^_ ^s^ "%.,&-»•?(»' adjudicated by this Court in thte writ petition. In case the petitioner fails to produce the caais certificate, the provisional admission can be canceUed at any time by the concemed authonty exercisjng his discretioa. tu view ofthe above, tlie writ petition is finally disposed ofin terms offhe impugned order dated 22.7.2010. Ct ^ Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge