IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24646 of 2008 SHAMBHU RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 01.10.2008 The case is under Section 25(1-b) 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The informant police officer alleged that he received information through the confessional statement of one accused that fire- arms of Kishori Ram has been kept at the house of Kishori’s Bahnoi Shambhu Ram i.e. the petitioner and that criminals had taken shelter there and that from this information a raid was conducted as a result of which some criminals were seen but they managed to escape and two guns and one rifle was recovered from the below the bed inside the house. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.1.2008. It is also submitted that the petitioner was not owner of the fire-arms but it belong to some others who were brother of his wife. The learned A.P.P. submits that recovery has been made from the pillow pad inside of the house. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not feel inclined to allow bail to the petitioner for the present. Hence, prayer is refused. However, if so advised, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after one year if the trial is not heard with the period. (C.M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-