IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Crl. Writ Petition No. 97 of 2009 Anand Singh. .……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. .………. Respondents Mr. M.C. Kandpal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kurban Ali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Advocate for respondent No. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that since more than two years have passed after the result of the election was declared, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous and the same be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 30.03.2010 30.03.2010 G