COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH: ^S'il^&isSm'Si ?^^^)^^1 wrn Dilip Kun'ar aged about 40 S/o. Sunder L3i!. £x-3sfD3Pch. Qrsn') Psnchsvst . Akaitari, Janpad Panchavat Biiha, Tahsi! & Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS Resoondsnts ^- State of Chhattlsgam; Thrcugh : Secretary, Panchayat D.K.S. Bhawan, Raiour. Distt. Raipur?C.G.i '. Dlrsctor of Pancnayat; empowered under the C.G. Fanchayat Raj Adniniyam 1993, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) i. Abhimanyu Kumar Dhimsr S/o. Rajkumar Dhimar, aged about 26 years I. Ramphai Dhimar, S/o. Late Gajraj Dhimar, aged about 55 vears '. Suritram Dhlmar, S/o Dayaram Dhimsr, 3Q£dsbout 30 yssrs Keluram Dhimar, S/o. Late Sukaiii Ram aged about oo years Ramnaravsn S/o Khamman L&\ aaed about 24 years i. Mitthuram Dhimar, S/o. Late Bakhatram aged about 55 years i. Rameshwar S/c Ramphai, aged about 22 ysars H p);npc;h Knnisr ?;?/n K^inr^m ?5r!ad shn;jt \^/^' 'i^ l \.'<u' f ^rt i ^^.1 J < ^rf<^ ;t^''>»^ ^<fr*LJl^Jlufl ^ i./iSiStn ys/os -B 11. Psrdeshi S/o Late Pakla Ram aged about 58 vears 12. Rajendra Kashyap 3/o Radheshyam Kashvao aaed about 32 vears t^ C^;^^ L'hE/^*'JS ^^I. O. t\ct[HL;E ScS; IU Oi S<Sf!; iCt O^ ^-'^^i^Y^'S ^f4.-^^ --S^^S ^ ^^. "\^QS7~< ! 'idi;; ;d cysu d^^/L,i. >•?'-/ ys;<s; s /< -j iO. iitlal Baiiram S/o Late Bisal Sahu, aged about 46 years Manharan Parkar S/Q. Late Harishchandra Parkar aaed about 48 rc..^rc; Rte 'fes-. f^, '2, 16. Ghasiram S/o Late Rangu Ram aged about 65 years A!l R/o. Village : Akaltari, Janpad Panchayat Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Writ Petftion under Article 227 of the Constitution of indja Present: Shri N.K. Chatterjee, counse! for the petitioner. a! r^ei] E-lE'^y/^St The order unde' challsnge is to the extent that the Court be!ow has fsiled to give adequate opportunity to the pstitioner for fliing response. In fact it is admiitsd on behaif of the Detitioner thaS eleven dsys' time was ailowed for filina the rssponse. It is further admitted on behaif of the petitioner that after syn^ry n'F'h^ tim^ nrt ^nnl'^st^n frir nrsnt nfftjri'hsr t1rn?:l tn fil?1 rssri^nsp s^s?: .T^'U"? ^*/ d •"•'^-r^ii^J'ktf'^i^/*h-<r»/^''ll'^/^r4Li'k-/E! tl-^» LWT<-AItLJl-/i li^r*-!i\/f L.laK^ L'^ jNi^/ It^^^^v-fl ^v?^w W<^1^? filed on behalf ofthe petitioner. !n such clrcumstances, it cannot be said that adsquate opportunity WBS not afforded to the petitloner. Over and above, s\'en the petitioner has not asked for time. No other point has been pressed in this pstiticn. In the iight of abovs, no interferencs is warrantsd under Article 227 of the Constitution of [ndia. Accordlngly, the writ pstition is dismisssd. Sd/- Acting Chief Justice h. •f^<^-