IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 5423 of 1999 Between: ..... PETITIONER AND .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.PRATAP REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ..... REGISTRAR THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.5423 OF 1999 ORDER: Both Sri P.Pratap Reddy, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri S.M.Subhani, Learned Standing Counsel for the 4th respondent – Wakf Board would agree that the subject matter of this writ petition is covered by the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.5465 of 1999 dated 25.6.2004. However, Sri S.M.Subhani, Learned Standing Counsel for the Wakf Board would submit that the right of the respondents to prefer an appeal against the order may be protected. It is wholly unnecessary to make any such observation since such a right is always available to a litigant. Recording the submission of both the counsel and, since the subject matter is covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No.5465 of 1999 dated 25.6.2004, this writ petition is also disposed of in terms of, and in accordance with the judgment of this Court in, W.P.No.5465 of 1999 dated 25.6.2004. No order as to costs. __________ 22-8-2008 asp