HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Singie Bench: Hon’ble Shn Dlllp Raosaheb Deshmukh J Appeiiant Criminal Revision No. 121 of 200s Hani @ Harsh Dewangan, S/o Navin Dewangan, aged about 3 years, minor through guardian adlitem mother Sarita R/o near of Mahoba Bazar Kota School PO Tatibandh PS Amanaka Raipur Distt 'Raipur (CG) Versus . Navin Dewangan, S/o Ram Manohar Dewangan, aged about 38 years, Rio near of Dr‘ Sushila Amanaka Thana Road, Tatibandh, P.O. Tati Bandh Amanaka, Distt. Raipur (CG) Respondent Criminal revision under Section 19 Sub Section 4 of Family Courts Acts Present: Ms. Meenu Banerjee, counsei for the applicant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 18.03.2009) Heard on admission (2) This revision is directed against the order dated 18.07.2005 passed by the 2"“ Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur in misct criminal case No.239l2005 awarding maintenance of Rs.900/- to the three years old minor son against the non-appiicant/father herein. (3) Learned counsei for the applicant argued that the amount of maintenance awarded by the Family Court is meager and is not in conformity with the status of the father. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that mother of the applicant namely Smt. Sarita is working as a peon. No evidence has been led before the Family Court to show the status of the father. (4) In this view of the matter I am of the considered opinion that no ground for Interference Is made out in the amount of maintenance awarded by the Family Court This reVIsron is deVOid of any merit and is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admisSion i Sdl- .\ ‘ Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Priya