IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN MONDAY, THE 17TH MAY 2010 / 27TH VAISAKHA 1932 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1533 of 2010() ------------------------------ CRA.62/2005 of ADDL. SESSIONS COURT, FAST COURT NO.III, PALAKKAD CC.1089/2001 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-III, PALAKKAD .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): REV.PETITIONER/APPELLANT/1ST ACCUSED. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.SULAIMAN, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O. BAVA ROWTHAR, AMAKULAMVEEDU, VADAKKANCHERY, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.BALAGOPAL RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDNETS/COMPLAINANT & STATE. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.A.PAZHANIMALA, S/O. APPU, KUNNUKADU VEEDU, THENKURUSSI, PALAKKAD. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS.SRI.A.R.GANGADAS, FOR R1 SRI.VENUGOPAL M.R., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, FOR R2. THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.K.MOHANAN, J. ------------------------------- Crl. R.P.No.1533 of 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of May, 2010. O R D E R The revision petitioner who is the 1st accused in C.C.No.1089/01 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate III, Palakkad and the appellant in Crl.A.No.62/2005 of the Sessions Judge, Palakkad , preferred this revision petition, challenging the judgments of the courts below in the above cases, in which the revision petitioner stand convicted u/s.420 of IPC. 2. By a separate order dated 17.05.2010 in Crl.M.A.No.4637 of 2010, this court allowed the compounding petition filed by the revision petitioner and the respondent No.1. In the light of the composition of the offence between the parties, I am of the view that this revision petition can be allowed, setting aside the judgment in Crl.Appeal No.62/2005 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Palakkad, dated 22.7.2008 and judgment in C.C.No.1089/2001 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate III, Palakkad, dated 17.1.2005 and acquitting the accused/revision petitioner. Crl. R.P.No.1533 of 2010 2 3. In the result, this revision petition is allowed setting aside the above judgments and acquitting the revision petitioner from all the charges levelled against him in the above case. Accordingly, this revision petition is allowed. V.K.MOHANAN, Judge. ami/