•:-^K:- BE;11!. ¥ 'litlliiil ti.J^Ei I E:i:;lt! lllll lllllill II,' ililll "^ M^ w 1:11 lil '°h :!i !i HIGHCOUICT OFCHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR SinnieBench Hon'bieShri H.L. Dattu. C^. Petitioner Resoondents WntPetition No^38 of 2005 Hemanf Kumar S/o l-1ari Singh, aged 37 yeare, Waterman in Goyt. Aadiv®si1-tostel, Bhatagaon, P.S.RanchiFai, Distt. Durg (C.G.). . :; ? . . . ., . veisus 1. \State of Chhattisgarh, through SecFetary, Schedule Tribes,: Schedule i: Castes and other backwara class weifare Department, Raipur(C.G.): 2. Coltector, Durg, District Durg.(C.G.). ; Present : Ms. Sushma Chandel.'counsei-forThe'petitioner. Shri N.K. Agrawal, Dy. SG. foFthe.respondents. eRAi.roRpeR (Passedon ;»st»lareh,2007) The casetof the petitioner is •that he was appoirited as a Peon (Class-je employee) in pre-Matric Aadivasi Boys Hostel, Arkar, DlstFict DUFg 12.08.1992 under'AnusuGhit.Jati/Janjati Vishesh Bhartiya Abhiyan' by conoemed Collectbr as per merit list prepared by the selection committee. on the :ne grievance of the petltiQner in this writ;petition js that the respondents hsive'not 1 . .' :^'.- .'.: ' :.: '^. ' -: '•.';" . • . ..';..,'•. • : •;" ::•- regularized hisserK'ices tlll date. The petitidner had filedja representation tothe Collector, Durg in this regard andthat hasnot.been decided. Theipetitioner n'iadeseveralrequestsforregularizat|oiiofhiSserviceSinpratandwritten:fofm, but the authorjtylis not ready to Itake any positive action. He had •filed representation totheCollector,.;Du[@-on;17.p9.2004. (2) : In. this petjtion fited; untagFi^irtiete;!226 relief^soyghl forbythepetifiQheniisjpslUBderl^ of the GiS'istitution'iW Indiai ffie: :;N'.';': •;il;:- w^- '^ ,11.; 2 'This Hon'bte Court kindly be pleased to-direct the respondents to pay the petitioner regular pay-scale with arrears of pay since 1992 or after 1992 making regu!arization." (3) In my opinion, the responsible respondents ought to have corisidered the grievanoes ofthe petitioner made in his representation. Since that has not been done, a direction requires to bftissued to the respondents. Accordingly, the following •- ^ ORDER (i) The writ petition isdisposed of. , (ii) A direction is issued to the competent authority before whom the representation said to have been filed by the petitioner is pending,.to consider the same and pass an appropriate order jn accordance with law, within sw. months from the date of reoeipt ofa copy ofthis order. Ordered aocordingly. ; Sd/, Chief Justice •I'iil IU ifR: