B;- ;ji Revisioner Complainant HIGHCOURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT B1LASPUR Criminal Revision No,600of2003 ^Bhanu Pratap son ofShyamtal Gond aged 29 years, residant of vijlage Chhuhi P.S. Arjuni Distt.Dhamtari (C.G.) Non-aoplicants Ex-accused 1. 2, 3. 4. - Ve.'sus Gowndram son of Chandrakaraged 35 years. Gendaram Rajkumar son of Manbodhi Sahu aged 40yeare. s .ii Ramcffandra son of Phoolji Sahu aged 50yeare. Chhabilal son of Ramji Sinha aged 38 yeare. Al! residents ofvillage Chhuhi P.S. Aquni Distriist Dhamiari (C.G.) (Criminal Revision under Section 397 (1)/ 401 of the Cr.P.C.) SB: Hon'bte Mr. T.P. Sharma.J. Present: None presentfor the appticant. None preserrt for ths non-appiicants. ORDER(ORAL1 (Passedon 11m March,201G) 1. When the pass over case is caHed out fw hearing, no representation is made on behalf ofthe parties. 2. I have perused the judgment dated 29.9.2003 passed by the SpedalJudge, in Special Sessions Case No.3/2002, whereby learned Special Jydge has acquittedthe non-appiicants. Acquitlal ofthe non-applicants is based on the evidence. 3. This 15 revision at the instance of prhate party. Tha Stete hse not flled any appeal against the judgment of acquittal. 1 do not find any prima facie illegality in the judgment impugned for invo!(ing inherent jurisdiction. Consequendy, the revisfon petition is dia'nissed. ; Sd/- T.P.Sha?Bia