5/ IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w;P.(C)No. WBE OF 2010 PETITIONER(S) Sudhakar Rae! Ukey (Suddhu), S/o. Late Jhadu Ukey, aged about 69 years, Ukey, D/o. Shri Sudhakar Rao Ukey, aged about 32 years, M 3. Miss Asha Ukey, D/o. Shri Sudhakar Rao Ukey, aged about 28 years, / 4. Prashant Ukey, S/o. Shri Sudhakar Ran Ukey, aged about 30 years, VERSUS .g’ State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) A11 Residence of Quarter No. 281, Janta Colony Tilak Nagar, Gudyari, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS High Level Caste Scrutiny Committee (Caste Certifxcate), through its Chairman, High Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, Scheduled Caste Research 8t Training Institute,, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Campus, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA CK”) “674/ :1. / / 2. Miss Leena HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO.4733 OF 2010 Sudhakar Ukey (Suddhu) & Others Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Another (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K, Agnihotri, J. Present :v Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS 5d ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 30m day of August, 2010) Grievance of the petitioner's is that the respondent Noi2—High Power Caste Scrutiny Committee (for short “the Committee") is not verifying the caste certificate of the petitioners-in spite of the fact that they have produced all the requisite documents. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly and fairly submit that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Dinesh Kurrlar Bhagoria v. State of Chhattisgarh & Ofhersl and other connected matters, wherein this Court after considering all the aspects of the matter and after considering the law laid down by the Supreme Court in umpteen number of the cases, in para 26 of the judgment and order has . made certain clarifications for verification of the caste certificate. In view of~foregoing, the writ petition is disposed of. The Committee is directed to proceed in accordance with the decision of this Court rendered in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria (supra) and other connected matters. il Sd/- ii Gowri / Satish K.Agnihotri i Judge I WP (S) No.3338 of 2007 decided on 19-8—2010