IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO. 43 OF 2008 Bhagwan Nile .. ..... ...... ......Petitioner V/s The Mun. Commr. Of Gr. Bombay & Ors..... ...... ...Respondents. Mr.Sushil Mahadeshwar a/w Mr.Ramesh Patil i/by Ajay Misar & Co., Adv. For the petitioner. Mr.D.A.Nalawade, GP for the State. Ms.Kiran Bagalia, Adv. For MMRDA. Ms.Ajithkumar, Adv. For BMC. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.P.DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 24th JULY 2008. PC: Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that they will look into the grievance made by the petitioner in the present writ petition. The highest authority in the State would consider and ensure that the Government Resolution is adhered to by the Bombay Municipal Corporation. 2. We are also of the considered view that it is not for the Court to enter in this controversy and we expect the Government and the Corporation to work for good and in the interest of public at large and award contracts in 1 conformity with Government Resolutions and in accordance with law while exercising its own powers under the Corporation Act. State shall take decision expeditiously and hopefully prior to the allocation of the tender. With above observations and in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the state writ petition stands disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 2