,N THE HIGH COURT OF MADY—IE PRADESH AT JEBALPUR I L Mrsc.pmmou No.: ix Q M1 /1994 WIIIMIlllmmllmlmlml! ’ ETITIONER: iM/s Med; Cement Ltd- a Limited Company registered as such under Companles Act and having its Unlt and Office at Mod; Gram(Rawan) -493-31, 'Distt. Raipu; (M.P ) '—VERSUS— ESPGmgNrs: (1;) State of Maahya pradesh, gg; \ g, a ’throggh: Secretary, Law, g , , valabhwBhawan, Bhopal‘ V : 27' I. _’ v I ' (2) South ‘Eéster’n Coal Fields Ltd; V { ‘ ‘1 . V ,.through::.jls_r. shyinance’ 0£ficer, Acceunts. 1-3,:~;R.N.T and, r "M Mukerjee Roaa, Ca1cutta.. ’ (3) Mcount‘s Officer (Sales)’ r South Eastern Coal Fie1&s Ltd,‘ Seepat Road, Bilaspur. :V IN TEE MATTER OF ARTICLE 226 AND 227 ' OF comsmITUTIoN OF INDIAa Ann V ‘ x L IN THE MATTER OF M.P .CESS ON STO%GE or COAL, 1981 (1 of 1982). ea. P ClR e "a W . L w XI—HC—22 Hm,m,m 3mm WW . .wQExggaégéb M W WW§NW %ar§mm Wmmw 7-7~2005 When the matter is eallee out, none present on behalf of the petitionev. No representation is made. Mr; Parag Kotecha, Panél Lawyer for the State/respondent No.1 . Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Senior ‘Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3. Heard both the counsel. Issue fixed date SPC o# 30‘“ August, 2005, to the petitioner on the address given in the petition td make arrangement for its representation in the matter before me Couit. it‘ should be made clear in the SPG that if no representation is made on beha matter will be dismissed for non-lprOsecutionu /,r L.c.eHAD°° i Judge i [if of the petitioner on the said date, then the / /@i7 (tied???) . e r