IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 30TH MARCH 2007 / 9TH CHAITHRA 1929 WA.No. 866 of 2007() -------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.3402/2007 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONER IN W.P.(C) -------------------------------- SHEENA SHUKKUR, AGED 34 YEARS, W/O.C.SHUKKUR, KAOANGOD, THURUTHI P.O., CHERUVATHUR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.IBRAHIM RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS IN W.P(C) ---------------------------------- 1. THE KANNUR UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, KANNUR UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, MANGATTUPARAMBA, KANNUR. 2. THE SYNDICATE, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, KANNUR UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, MANGATTUPARAMBA, KANNUR. 3. DINKAR V.R., S/O.B.RAVEENDRAN, RESIDING AT ARUNODAYAM, KOOTALI P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASEENDRAN,SC,KANNUR UNIVERSITY FOR R1&R2 SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN FOR R3 THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/3/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.Raman & Antony Dominic, JJ. ======================== W.A.No.866 of 2007 ======================== Dated this the 30th day of March, 2007. JUDGMENT Raman,J. This appeal is against an interim order passed by a learned single Judge. Appellant is the petitioner, who challenges the rejection of his application for the post of Reader in the first respondent – University whereas the University selected the third respondent as having possessed the requisite qualifications and experience. According to the appellant, the third respondent does not have the required qualifications or experience whereas the appellant possessed all the requisite qualifications and experience and therefore the rejection of his application and the appointment of the third respondent is per say is illegal. This matter is under examination in the Writ Petition pending before the learned single Judge. The learned single Judge while passing the interim order, made it clear that the appointment can be made provisionally and subject to the result of the Writ Petition and further ordered that no monetary benefits shall be paid until orders are obtained from this Court and thus the order does WA 866/07 -: 2 :- not cause any prejudice to either parties. This order is now impugned in this appeal. In the nature of the order now passed, we are not satisfied this to be a fit case for further consideration in appeal under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act. However, it is open to the appellant to seek an early disposal of the Writ Petition by filing an application before the learned single Judge. Appeal is dismissed. P.R.Raman, Judge. Antony Dominic Judge.0 ess 2/4