(^ 3D^T W R-fith ^PV 5ffT^T sti*lict) .L> \ ~Sv^ '<ii<<icii-!<, yiTf1<ifi<B, Rjciiiy^ ^...^:^I:...N:Q,....5^.c^,... •WTFIT g?nra? ••-•-•'•••••••••••••'<•-- --f--"/---^ 200 an^r iraqi (l^f^a??) TOiiW^ifci aii^r [Stngl PeWimwp*- e^ Benchj^Hon yesi Patr Vs «,».' Stafe of Chhattisgarh, Through; P S. &is1(t. SargLya (C.fi.). ®. 12^2007 AAr. Shravan .Agorwai, Mr.ff.K. Beriwa!, &y. 1-ieard on admisslon. By this petition under impugned the order dated ll.j whereby learned 3 Addit| rejected his revision against seized in connection with the After going through tl| below and aff-er perusa! of No.245/06, I am of the infirmity 'm the order impugr|i of the Cr.P.C. In the resuh", the dismissed and it is herebydisji CM*l[^1<ft*TjHIH^f ^f f^^ <,[<1'^.|<. i? aiRn aii^i ble Mr. Jus .P.No. 564/07 Iqbal, S/o ^Sheikh Ramjm, aged about 's, Prop: Ejaz 5teel Enterprises, K/o Vilh ia, P.5. Patna, Distt. Korea (C.S.) ^jdv. for the peti+ioner A^v. ©enera!for the irespondent. |Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. the petitioner hus ?.2007 passed in Crtmina! Revision No.98/2007 |onc! Sessions Judge (FTC), Ambikapur- has I'he refusai of interim custody of the articles 'rime No.3/06. ^e impugned orders passed by both the courts 1'he earlier order passed in Crimina! Revision ppinion that there is no iltegaiity or id wiarrantlng interference under Section 482 petijtion has no substance, the same is liable to be isjnissed at the admission stage itseif. sini Sd/- DhirendraMishia Judge