HIGH COURT^OF CHHATTISGAML BU.AS^BR W-it Petitioa(8) NQ.S754/2007 Petitioner RESPOMDBNTS 2. 3. Uttam Singh, age about 36 year, Asstetant Teacher, s/o Shri Sant Ram Sahu, Govfc Middle School Bachedi, Block Berla, district Dwg{CG) Rati Kaat Siagh Choiihaa, aged about 37 year, Assistaut Teacher s/o Shri Ram Singh Choiihan Oovt. Primaiy School kodwa Block Berla, Distrfct Dui^(CG) Rameshwar Lal Sabu, age about 37 year Asst. Teacher S/o Shri Ram Singh Choula.an Govt Prunaiy School BIulori Block Berla, district Dui^9CG) yersits State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, fhrough Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare Department & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, District Raipur (C.G) Dista-ict Education officer, Beinetara District Durg (C.G) BIock Education ofBcer Beria, DistrictDui^(C.G) Writ petitloa uader Article 226 ofthe ConsUtAtton^f India Appeartmce: Shri Soinkant Verma, counsel for the Petttioners. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Pancl Lawycr for the State/ respondents on advance copy ORALORD@l (25.9.20071 SunlIJtumw Sinha, J. Heard on admission. Learaed counsel for the petitioncrs subimts that the petitioners have passed B.T.I. exauiination on their own expeases, therefore, they are eatitled to receive two advance increraeuts accordiag to circulars dated WP(S)5754/2007 ^ sunita 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999. He also submits that ia niaay identical inatters, the petitions have been aUowcd in tenas of the ordcr passed in the case of y«ishu>ant Kunwir Bhcirtidwwf 7s. JKiuitctocrf CorDonttion. Jhtra and another {2006 IJ3S SSPJK-CG 96}. He subnuts that fhe case ofthe petitioners is squarely covered by fhe said Judgment This legal position is aot disputed by the l^araed coimsel for the State. However, he submits fhat the cwder may be passed ia terms of fhe said judgment, but it shaU be subjected to verification regarding petitioaa-s' such qualification. Accordingly, this writ petidon is aUowed in tenas of the order passed in case of Yashwant Kumar Bhcavtdwaj Vs. Mwadpal Corporatian, Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of fhe facts as to whether fhe petitioners had acquired B.T.I. Examinatk>n Certificates on their own expenses aa per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 aad further whether they have been paid two advauce iacrements or not. The petition staads finaUy disposed of. No order as to costs. _^_ Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge