[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.878 OF 2007 IN SESSIONS BAIL APPLICATION NO.253 OF 2007 IN C.R.NO.424 OF 2005 Mr.Raju Chintamani Mallah ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.V.Y.Mishra advocate for applicant Mr.S.R.Shinde A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : APRIL 25, 2007 DATE : APRIL 25, 2007 DATE : APRIL 25, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No. 424 of 2006 of Vile Parle (E) Police Station, Mumbai. The said case is mainly under Sections 394 and 397 of IPC. 3. It is the prosecution case that on 27.9.2003 three unknown persons accosted the complainant [-2-] Mr.Kulkarni who was returning home from his company. At that time, the complainant was carrying a briefcase containing Rs.5,91,113/-. As he entered into the gate of his residential building, three unknown persons stopped him and at the point of knife and revolver, snatched the briefcase and they fled away in an autorickshaw. The complainant has identified the present applicant in the test identification parade as the person who was holding the revolver. It is seen that there is sufficient material which implicates the present applicant, hence, I do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail. 4. Application is rejected. [Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.]