IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP. No. 2105 of 2011 Date of Decision: 9.9.2011. Varun Kaushal --Petitioner Versus Ltd. General (Retd.) Dr. D.D.S. Sandhu & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. S.K. Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) This contempt petition has been filed for alleged non- compliance of the order dated 20.11.2009 passed by this Court in CWP No. 13799 of 2009. Vide the aforesaid order following directions were issued:- “ Applying the same principle, I direct that the petitioner be admitted to the current academic session of the course in question forthwith and the seat shall be deemed to be an additional seat and over and above the intake capacity of the University for which the University shall make appropriate recommendation to the Bar Council. However, this additional seat shall be only during the current academic session for the purpose of adjustment of the petitioner. For the reasons recorded above, the present writ petition is allowed with no order as to costs.” It is admitted case of the petitioner that he was admitted to the course on 10.12.2009, however, on account of shortage of lectures, he was not permitted to appear in the 1st semester examination even though, he was charged the examination fee. The petitioner was, thereafter allowed to appear in the 1st semester examination which was scheduled to be held in December, 2010/January, 2011 and was allowed to attend the classes as a casual student as is evident from the letter dated 26.7.2010. He was further COCP. No. 2105 of 2011 -2- informed that on completion of lectures, he can appear in the examination of 2nd semester to be held in May, 2011. It is again an admitted position that the petitioner took admission as a casual student by depositing casual admission fee. It is alleged that due to some mistake the petitioner was asked to attend the morning classes, however, the petitioner being a student of the evening classes attended the evening classes and he was informed that he has attended the evening classes in contravention with the directions of Bar Council. According to averments made in the petition, petitioner filled up the casual admission form on 28.8.2010 on which he was given the Roll No.156 and thereafter again given another Roll No.281. It is alleged that two different roll numbers were given by the Clerk for extraneous reasons and after correction of the roll number, his attendance was marked w.e.f. 1.11.2010. Aggrieved of the action of the respondents in not allowing him to take 1st semester examination, petitioner filed CWP No.22248 of 2010. This petition was dismissed by the Court and the L.P.A there against also came to be dismissed. The petitioner has filed an S.L.P against the aforesaid orders. Now this contempt petition has been filed for alleged violation of the order dated 20.11.2009. From the averments made in the contempt petition, it is abundantly clear that this judgement was implemented and petitioner was granted admission to the evening course. It was only on account of subsequent orders which includes non-attendance of lectures that petitioner was not allowed to appear in the 1st semester examination for which the petitioner also approached this Court and writ petition came to be dismissed. Any subsequent event after the admission, is a fresh cause of COCP. No. 2105 of 2011 -3- action and thus, the petitioner cannot allege violation of the order dated 20.11.2009. No merit, petition dismissed. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 9.9.2011. lucky