IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.10369 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 21, 2011 Dinesh Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Gautam Kailey, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner is a dependent of ESM. His right for consideration would arise in case the ESM candidates are not available. There is no information placed on record by the petitioner to show that the ESM candidates are not available. Counsel contends that the petitioner had sought information under the Right to Information Act, but the same has not been supplied to him. The petitioner may first obtain the information and then may make an approach before this court. In the absence of this information, right of the petitioner for consideration cannot be considered. Dismissed at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition after obtaining the relevant information. September 21, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE