^ I|j_ E___HIM 001^ ^ ^ODlC^i'y^ ^" ~::-^X^_^a^i I AT JABALPUR W.P. No. '14-^ '^v/1999 PBTITIONEEl •> 'y, )• RESPQIlDEBiTS 5 9e Ra5 KiAmar Chaaehalaiai, soa of late SMri Khera3®a2. Chaiaohalani» aged ab©ut 47 years> Proprie'tors &&j Steel Prodtiets, a proprietorship eoncerH, resident of Parwant Col@ny, Civil Lines, Raipur (M»P.) V ER S HS Allatoabad B@nk» a body in©©rp@rat@d laoder the provisioas ©f Bai&iiig Companies (Acquisltioa & Tra.nsfer 6f UndertakiBg) Act, 1970, havizig its Branch Office at G.E. Road, Raipw (M.P.) 2, Colle©tor» Raipiar (M«P«) 5» Addltional Tehsildar, Raipur (^P.) PETITION UHDm ARTICLIS 226 & 227 OP 2HE C08S5TITUTIOM OF XNDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AI? APPROFRIAtE; miT IN THE mTURE GF mMDAMUS. ©IRECT10N. C®TIORARX. PROHIBI^ON OR SEIE LIKE ETC. : iNNnnrfNi: HTGH COIJRT OF CHHATTT80ARH AT BI7A8PIJR PETmONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION No, 1782 ofl9?9 Raj Kumar Chanchalam, VRRSIJ8 Allahabad Baisk & Others, ^ (i^ PRTmON IJNDRR ARTTC7,R8 226 &227 OF THE CONS^TimON OF INDIA SB: Hon»WeShri Satish K. Agniliotri, J. Present: Shri Bha.skar Pay^i. Advocate tor the petttioner Shri Vivek Venna, Advocate for the respondenl No. 1, Shri P,K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondent No.2and3. ORDER (Passed on 22nd day ofNovember, 2011) 1. Leamed coimsel appearmg for the petitioner, on mstnictions, seeks permission oftMs Coiirt to withdraw tfais petition. 2, Leamed coimsel appearing for other side have no objection. 3. It is ordered accordingfy 4, Coiiseqiiently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdravm. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit