IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35479 of 2010 RAJESH RAVIDAS @ BINOD JI, SON OF RAMBALAK RAVIDAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 28.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 127 of 2009 registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of the Arms Act and 17 of Criminal Law Amendment Act. Petitioner is named in the First information Report along with several other persons and it is stated that on the alleged date of occurrence, all the First information Report named accused persons along with some unknown persons came at the place of occurrence and made indiscriminate firings committing the murder of two persons. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no specific overt act has been attributed against the petitioner and in course of investigation, some witnesses, vide Paragraphs no. 18, 21 and 22, have stated that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case on account of village politics. In my view, in a case in which several persons having fire arms, committed murder of two persons by opening indiscriminate firings, it is very difficult to make specific allegation against any of the accused person. So far as the stand of false implication is concerned, there is nothing on the record to show that there was some enmity between the petitioner and informant. Furthermore, I find that petitioner carries criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties I am not inclined to grant the privilege of bail to petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected. Before parting with this order I think it proper to mention here that on yesterday when I was dictating the order, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly pointed out that petitioner carries criminal antecedent of four other cases in which the petitioner has already been allowed bail. The aforesaid material motivated me to reject the prayer for bail of the petitioner but the conduct of learned counsel for the petitioner is highly appreciable. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )