IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL MCC Review Application No. 810 of 2009 In Writ Petition (M/S) No. 349 of 2009 Ravinder Kumar …Petitioner. Versus State of Uttaranchal and another. …Respondents. Mr. Lok Pal Singh & Mr. Sachin Panwar, Advocates for the review applicant/petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, Advocate for the respondents. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. 1. This review petition has been filed for reviewing the order dated 30.4.2009, whereby the Writ Petition bearing No. 349 of 2009 had been dismissed by this Court. 2. It is by now well settled that the scope for interference in a review petition is extremely limited. Apart from this, there are no good grounds stated in the review petition on the basis of which any interference can be made. 3. In view of the above, the instant review petition is dismissed. 4. Since the review petition has already been dismissed, there is no need to pass a formal order disposing of the Delay Condonation Application which is filed along with the present review petition. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 30.4.2010 Rathour