IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3428 of 2011 MUNNA PRASAD SON OF RAM VIVEK SAH --------------- PETITIONER Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case registered under Sections 2(1,a)(m), 7(1), 7(III) and rule 50(I) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. The milkcake being purchased from shop of the petitioner, was found to be adulterated. The Chemical Laboratory Report suggests that the presence of simple starch in the sample. It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that he was not the manufacturer of the milkcake as it was brought from Sharda Milk Udyog R.K. Product. Considering the fact that the Chemical Laboratory Report does not suggest any serious nature of adulteration, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory 2 bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar Sub-Division, Sitamarhi in connection with Tr. No. 2559/2010 arising out of Complaint Case No. C2/7/10, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)