IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20666 of 2010 RAM PRASAD SAHNI, S/O BATAHU SAHNI, R/O VILLAGE-BELARI, P.S. UJIYARPUR, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR. …………………Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 11.10.2010 Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.M.P. Mahto, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The sole petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 244 of 2009, for the offence under Section 364(A), 34 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. Sri Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner, while pressing the bail petition submits that there is no sufficient material against the petitioner. It has further submitted that on recovery the police found that the victim who is husband of the informant was completely in drunken condition. It has also been submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. In this case earlier case diary was called, which indicates that this petitioner was one of the associates in kidnapping the husband of the informant and after kidnapping demand of Rs. 15 lakh was made and thereafter the victim was carried to different place, even he was injected from time to time by the accused persons. Victim was carried from one place to other places, and finally police recovered the victim. At the same time this petitioner was also arrested. In this case there is sufficient material against the petitioner. 2 Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge him on bail. Accordingly the petition stands rejected. Bhardwaj ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)