IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-5687 of 2009 Date of decision:15.10.2009. Brij Mohan and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. P.K.Ganga, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. S.S.Pattar, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. A.K.Khunger, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. Learned State counsel does not controvert the factual averment made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that a cancellation report has since been submitted to the learned Illaqua Magistrate. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 states that he would enter appearance before the learned Magistrate and have a say in the form of a protest petition. In the light thereof, the present petition for quashment is rendered infructuous and disposed of accordingly. October 15, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE