IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 10TH JULY 2008 / 19TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 16991 of 2008(W) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- PARAMESWARAN NAIR, SREENILAYAM, CHETTIPPARAMBU, VENGARA P.O., TIRUR, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITYM MALAPPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.V. MANOJ KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/07/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.16991/2008-W: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBIT: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 22/04/2008 IN M.V.A.R.P. NO. 116/08. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 16991 OF 2008 (W) = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 10th day of July 2008 J U D G M E N T Ext. P1 is the judgment of the STAT directing reconsideration of the settlement of timings. Petitioner, however, complains the delay in convening a timing conference in pursuance to Ext. P1. 2. Learned Govt. Pleader, on instruction, submits that the proceedings pursuant to Ext. P1 is scheduled to be considered by the Secretary, RTA and that on priority basis the same shall be done. 3. Since the respondent is having a priority in the matter of settlement of timings, for the only reason that the petitioner has approached this Court, it may not be proper to direct the respondent to overlook the priority. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that strictly following the priority that is already fixed, the timing of the petitioner shall be settled in pursuance to Ext.P1, as expeditiously as possible. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-