IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASBUR u gHHATTISGARH 7 w§iT.PETITION. No..‘;.??.%.[.§.../2006 3WQLE BENiiH RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY S/ O LATE GAJADHAR PRASAD PANDEY AGED 32 YEARS, OCCUPATION: TEACHER, GOVT. PRIMARY SHOOL, DABRAPARA, BLOCK: PATAN, DISTT: DURG (C.G) PETITIONER VERSUS 1. TATE OF CHHATTISGARH /THROUGH: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, MANTRALAYA, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR (CTG) RESPONDENTS DISTRICT EDUCATION /OFFICER, DISTRICT DURG(C.G) “PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS TO ‘ MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARY AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS” 1. ; PETITIONE?‘ W C S XI-HC>22 3a W, mg, W am m Wm Lwf:....Z.éLl.! @CQW 1 W tuna vmmqrza’ x ‘ 12-?-2oos:_:_ r iorthe petit‘oner and ri mes Bja Heard Shri Anurag Jha counee! on advance copy Govt Advocate for the Statefrespondent The case of the petitioner is trat he is working a Arit ch, eince 3G 9 94 and as per the instructions dated 24 12 98 issud y th Stat ' ‘ MP. the ASSIStant Teachere who hc examinatian on their own expenses afte increments and order of Government is D Ed examination on his own Dost effect xa Annexure—P/S but t‘we petm whereas Similarly Situated persons havi under he orders of the Tribunal and tnis Having heard ieamed counsel'fr and circumstances of the case, withoutz case, the petitioner is allowed to make a of this petition raising aiirhis grievances days from today and in turn, respondent the petitioner in the iight of avermente n din the representation aiso, simiiariy; situated ”persons have beer increments and the petitioner’s caseris increments on the baeis of Governme, period of 3 months from today; in acoorr With the'direotion aforesaid, the Parties are entitled for certified c WW WW $Wwésr _ Batve s ssiista Teaer e b e e of \Ie passed ,BtTl. nd E tr 22 40—64Iare entitled for two ce annexure—P/t The ne s the year 1996 and a cer tat oner has not been t = been granted two advance ncrements Court Vide Annexur I. r the‘parties, having reard t e c expressing any opinio f th erit o te 1' detailed representation lon wh cp to respondent No.3 wthi rod of No3 is directed to exine he case of ' wade by the petitioner in t ptition and >nt No3 reaches to t conousi t granted the benefi f tw v also coveredfor'grant o two ac 1t’s order, then to‘pass ord in lance with law. aetition stands disposed of. apy of this order lf respondr, Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo [141%élisa ’ Sh Suh aj, B Ed a M d advan petitior pased his tificate to h given he benefit i- e P6 g o th fats n o e m f h ag it oy in a pei 15 am t his e he ion tha t o o adance f advne ers with a