IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2010 / 25TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 15349 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- S.JAYAKUMAR, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.A.G.PILLAI, ACTING ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWAM BOARD, CHENGANUR DEVASWAM, ARANMULA GROUP (RESIDING AT SANTHI NIVAS, MAZHUKEER, KAALLISSERRY). BY ADV. SRI.S.JAYAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWAM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWAM BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEVASWAM COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWAM BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT DEVASWAM COMMISSIONER, ARANMULA, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 4. ASSISTANT DEVASWAM COMMISSIONER, THIRUVALLA GROUP. ADV. SRI.P.GOPAL FOR R1,2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.15349 OF 2010 (P) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is an Acting Administrative Officer, Chenganur Devaswam in Aranmula Group. According to the petitioner he submitted a medical reimbursement claim for Rs.1 lakh and seeking reimbursement of the expenses incurred by him in connection with his treatment for heart decease. It is stated that certain defects were pointed out and that were cured and bills were resubmitted. Complaint is that despite that reimbursement has not been effected so far. 2. Standing counsel appearing for the respondents on instruction submits that the petitioner had submitted medical reimbursement claim for Rs.9452/- which was for treating Arthritis and not heart decease. It is stated that this claim of the petitioner was considered by the Devaswom Commissioner and was rejected by order dated 29.4.2010. It is stated that the order of rejection is being communicated to the petitioner. WPC.No.15349 /2010 :2 : 3. Now that the Commissioner has rejected the claim of the petitioner, the prayer sought in this writ petition is cannot be considered. Therefore, directing that the petitioner shall be communicated the decision taken by the respondents on the medical reimbursement claim submitted by the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/