HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRL.R.C.No.1920 of 2002 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order passed in M.P.No.93 of 2002 in M.C.No.7 of 2001 dated 13.09.2002 on the file of the Family Court, Secunderabad. Respondents 1 and 2 herein, being the daughter-in- law and grand son of the petitioners 1 and 2 herein, filed the aforesaid M.P.No.93 of 2002 seeking maintenance at the rate of Rs.500/- per month from the petitioners herein. The trial Court, after an analysis of the entire evidence available on record, awarded interim monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs.350/- each to the respondents 1 and 2 herein. Questioning the said order, the petitioners herein preferred the present revision. Heard both sides and perused the impugned order. The trial Court, on a consideration of the entire material available on record, held that the petitioners herein are liable to pay maintenance to the respondents 1 ands 2 herein as the estate of the husband of the 1st respondent is in their custody and accordingly granted interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.350/- each to the respondents 1 and 2 herein. The Court below was justified in awarding the said amount. In the light of the above, I am of the view that the trial Court has given sufficient and cogent reasons in allowing the aforesaid petition filed by respondents 1 and 2 herein. I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order of the Court below. The Criminal Revision Case is accordingly dismissed. However, the Court below is directed to dispose of the main M.C.No.7 of 2001 as expeditiously as possible. _______________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 15.07.2010 Gsn.