IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No.16263 of 2010 Date of decision: 10.9.2010 Virgo Softech Ltd. -----Petitioner. Vs. State of Haryana and others. -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL Present:- Mr. Ashwani Kumar Chopra, Sr.Advocate with Ms. Jaishree Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. --- ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This petition seeks direction for consideration of bid of the petitioner in response to RFP, Annexure P-1, for selection of System Integrator for implementation of Smart Card based Public Distribution System in Haryana by the Haryana State Electronic Development Corporation Ltd., respondent No.2 and to award the work to the petitioner, restraining respondent No.2 from allotting work to respondent No.6. 2. Objection of the petitioner is that respondent No.2 deviated from the terms notified in the RFP to favour respondent No.6. CWP No.16263 of 2010 3. We find that the petitioner has not even approached respondent No.2 with the points now raised in the writ petition, in absence of which writ of mandamus cannot be entertained. 4. Faced with the above situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with a view to approach respondent No.2 in the first instance. 5. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as proposed. 6. If the petitioner makes any representation to respondent No.2 within one week from today, decision may be taken thereon within two weeks thereafter. The matter may be finalised after considering the said representation unless the matter has already been finalised before receiving a copy of this order. It is made clear that we have neither looked into the merits of the case nor expressed any opinion thereon. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE September 10, 2010 ( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) ashwani JUDGE 2