1 ABA 91-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.91 OF 2011 Rajashree Umesh Mali ..Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.P.G.Sarda, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 20TH JULY, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail on the ground that applicant's infant son was not well and he requires treatment and breast feeding etc. Interim order dated 10th February, 2011 was passed because the applicant's son requires treatment. Now, the son is about one and half years. The latest status report from 2 ABA 91-2011 Dr.Suresh Shivaji Honmane, which is attested by the Medical Superintendent, Mangalwedha, District Solapur shows that the applicant's son has recurrent episodes and recurrent bronchitis in which he requires frequent treatment, follow up maternal care and breast feeding. This is not an acute problem and therefore cannot be a ground for admitting the applicant to anticipatory bail perpetually. By virtue of interim order applicant has been able to look after the son for almost five months now, which should be sufficient. That order stands vacated. 3. As far as merits go, the order dated 15th December, 2010 is clear and the statements made by the victim before her death have already been considered. The victim had no reason to name the applicant as one, who struck the match stick, in the two dying declarations given before the police and the Special Executive Magistrate. In view of 3 ABA 91-2011 this, Criminal Application is rejected. The applicant may surrender within a period of seven days. Observations in this order need not be considered if the applicant applies for regular bail after surrendering before the appropriate Court. 4. Criminal Application stands disposed of. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)