BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT ORGANISED BY THE HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE PRESENT : BARRISTER SHRI. M.P.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR (SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) AND SHRI. K.J.THOMAS STANLEY (RETD. ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE) TUESDAY, THE 1ST APRIL 2008 / 12TH CHAITHRA 1930 RSA.No. 763 of 2004() --------------------- OS.99/1998 of SUB COURT,KATTAPPANA AS.24/2001 of ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, THODUPUZHA .................... APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS -------------------------------------- 1. KALIYANI, W/O.ITTIRA, KADATHA, AGED 80 YEARS, RESIDING AT KODINJAVELIL HOUSE, 65TH MILE SPRING VALLEY P.O., PERIYAR VILLAGE, PEERMADE TALUK. 2. SREEDHARAN, S/O.ITTIRA, KADATHA, AGED 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT KODINJAVELIL HOUSE, 65TH MILE SPRING VALLEY P.O., PERIYAR VILLAGE, PEERMADE TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.CHACKO(PARATHANAM) SRI.ASHA CHACKO RESPONDENTS: PLAINTIFFS ----------------------- 1. SANTHAMMA, W/O.NARAYANAN, AGED 55 YEARS, EKKATTIL HOUSE, 65TH MILE, SPRING VALLEY P.O., PERIYAR VILLAGE, PEERMADE TALUK. 2. AMMINI, W/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN, AGED 53 YEARS, THONIKUZHIYIL HOUSE, SPRING VALLEY P.O., PERIYAR VILLAGE, PEERMADE TALUK. 3. KUNJUMOL, W/O.SASIDHARAN, AGED 46 YEARS, PALAKUZHAMANNIL HOUSE, KOCHARA P.O., ANAKKARA VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK. 4. INDIRA, W/O.SUDHAKARAN, AGED 47 YEARS, THONIKUZHIYIL HOUSE, SPRING VALLEY P.O., PERIYAR VILLAGE, PEERMADE TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI SRI.JOSEPH PATHALIL THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR DETERMINATION AT LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING ORDER IS PASSED BARRISTER SHRI. M.P.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR (SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) AND SHRI. K.J.THOMAS STANLEY (RETIRED ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE) ------------------------------------------------------------- R.S.A.NO: 763 OF 2004-G ------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st April, 2008. O R D E R Appellants and counsel are present. Respondents and counsel are present. We are happy to state that the parties have come to an amicable settlement of the dispute in the above appeal. Accordingly the property described in 'A' schedule to the plaint which is lying on the eastern side of K.K.Road will be allotted to the respondents towards their share in the properties sought to be partitioned. The property described in 'B' schedule to the plaint and the land appurtenant thereto (virivu) will be allotted to the appellants towards their share in the properties sought to be partitioned. It is stated by the appellants that the entire property had been mortgaged to the State Bank of Travancore, Kumali branch. The appellants undertake to redeem this mortgage within six months from today so that the property will be free from R.S.A.NO: 763/04 -2- encumbrances as per the above settlement. Post this case on 6.10.2008 for reporting the compromise signed by all the parties. The case stands settled on the above terms. In view of the above settlement, we are confident that the second appellant and his children will have no objection to allow the respondents and their children to visit the first appellant whenever they wish to do so. Call on 6.10.2008. SD/-BARRISTER SHRI. M.P.RAMACHANDRN NAIR SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA SD/- SHRI. K.J.THOMAS STANLEY RETIRED ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE jj