THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 2877 of 2003 Oral order: When the matter is taken up for hearing, neither the petitioners nor their counsel are present nor is there any representation made on their behalf. However, Ms. Sindhu Kumari, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the subject-matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by a Division Bench of this Court in Board of Adult Education and Training v. Board of Intermediate Education[1], wherein the Division Bench refused to grant similar relief, as is prayed for by the petitioners in this writ petition. In the circumstances, following the aforesaid judgment of the Division Bench of this Court, and for the reasons mentioned therein, this writ petition is also dismissed. No costs. N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 11th July, 2007. KSR [1] 2003 (6) ALT 761 (DB)