WPMS No. 1796 of 2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By means of the petition, the petitioners have prayed a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 24.07.2009 passed by A.D.J./III F.T.C., Udham Singh Nagar in Civil Revision No. 58 of 2008, Ashok Kumar Luthara Vs Baljinder Singh & another. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent – Ashok Kumar filed a civil suit before the learned Civil Judge (S.D.), Udham Singh Nagar which was dismissed vide order dated 09.09.2008. Thereafter, feeling aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the respondent again preferred a revision before the A.D.J./III F.T.C., Udham Singh Nagar which allowed vide order dated 24.07.2009. Feeling aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and order, the petitioners have preferred this petition before this Court. Heard Sri Arvind Vashisth, learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. After having considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and perusing the material available on record, I come to the conclusion that the impugned judgment and order does not suffer with any illegality. The revisional court after considering the documents available on record rightly held that all the issues are necessarily involved in the case and therefore, the issue No. 9 is not sustainable and sent back the matter to the court below with a direction to restore the civil suit to its original number and decide the same as per law. I do not find any ground to interfere in the impugned judgment and order passed by the court below. The petition lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in- limine. (B.C.K., J.) 26.10.2009 ASWAL