1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Civil Application No.143 of 2007 In Writ Petition No.1204 of 2003 Tukaram Tanaji Mandhare & anr. Applicants Vs. Raymon WoollenMills Ltd. & ors. Respondents Mr.Yogendra Pendse for applicants. Mrs.Meena Doshi for resp.no.1. Ms.Bina Dholkia for resp.no.2. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. January 30, 2008 P.C. . Heard Mr.Pendse, the learned counsel for the applicants. Mrs.Doshi appears for the respondent no.2 and Ms.Dholkia appears for the respondent no.2 - contractor. Respondent nos.3 and 4 are not necessary parties and they be deleted forthwith. . Affidavit-in-reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent no.1. . By this application the applicants are seeking directions against the respondent no.1 to allow them to resume their normal duties and to pay them wages regularly. It appears that there was some misunderstanding on account of the identity cards and 2 the applicants allegedly refused to submit their photographs for preparing the identity cards by respondent no.1 so that the entry in the premises of the establishment would be on the basis of the said identity cards. Mrs.Doshi, the learned counsel for the respondent no.1 has clarified that the identity card will carry the name of the principal employer as well as the contractor and, therefore, if the applicants submit the photographs of the required size, the I-cards would be issued to them and they would report for duty. Consequently this application does not survive. . Mr.Pendse states that the applicants will submit the photographs to the respondent no.2 by tomorrow before 11 a.m. and the respondent no.2 - contractor will issue the identity cards tomorrow before the closure of the office hours so that the applicants would resume duty from 1st February 2008. . The application is disposed off accordingly. (B.H.MARL