1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6037/2009 Municipal Board, Churu Vs. Labour Court, Bikaner & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 3.8.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. SD Vyas, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. On reference under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the matter came up before the Labour Court and the Labour Court, Bikaner vide award dated 10th May, 2005 held that one of the employees Muna Lal was removed from service without following the process of law and, therefore, he is entitled to reinstatement with certain consequential benefits. The other employee Prem Chand could not prove his case, therefore, his claim was rejected by the same order dated 10th May, 2005 by the labour court. The petitioner Municipal Board aggrieved against the order in favour of Munna Lal of his reinstatement etc has preferred this writ petition. It appears that after appreciation of the evidence, the labour court reached to the conclusion that the respondent- employee Munna Lal fully proved that he was employee of the petitioner and he has been removed without following the process of law and, therefore, the termination of his 2 services is illegal. After going through the reasons given in the impugned order dated 10.5.2005, I do not find any illegality in the order dated 10.5.2005. Hence, there is no merit in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA),J. cpgoyal/-