IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1899 of 2010 (M/S) R.B.N.S. Sugar Mills Ltd. Through its General Manager (P&A)/ Factory Manager ..……… Petitioner Versus Ranveer Singh and others ……… Respondent Mr. R.K. Raizada, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the respondent. Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Shri R.K. Raizada, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri B.M. Pingal, the learned counsel for the workman. Serious allegations have been made against the Presiding Officer as well as against the Peshkar of the Labour Court. It is alleged that the petitioner was present on 6th April, 2010 but the ordersheet wrongly records that the employer’s pairokar was absent. Similarly, it is alleged that the petitioner’s representative was present on 15th April, 2010 and again the Labour Court ignored his presence and recorded that the employer’s representative was absent. In this regard, the petitioner has filed an application dated 16th April, 2010 for recall of the ex-parte order dated 16th April, 2010 which is pending consideration. Without going into the validity and legality of the ex-parte award, I dispose of the writ petition at this stage directing the Labour Court to decide the restoration application within two weeks from the date of the production of a certified copy of the order after hearing the workman concerned. This order has been passed in the presence of Shri B.M. Pingal, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 workman. The parties are directed to appear before the Labour Court on 22nd November, 2010. Till the disposal of the restoration application, the award shall remain in abeyance. Certified copy of the order shall be made available to the learned counsel within three days. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 12th November, 2010 Shiv