THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT PETITION No.262 of 2010 ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice G.V.Seethapathy) This writ petition is taken up based on the letter, dated .2009, addressed to the Chief Justice, High Court of Andhra esh, by the petitioner, wherein it is alleged that her hter- Smt Devarakonda Mallika, son-in-law-Devarakonda sh and his friend-Pendyam Bhaskar were taken away by Circle Inspector of Police, Kakinada, and his staff on .2009 from her house. About any case being registered against them, the first ndent-Station House Officer, Kakinada, filed counter- vit, wherein it is stated that the alleged detenus- rakonda Mallika and Pendyam Bhaskar were arrested by wada Government Railway Police on 14.12.2009 and were to the Railway Police Outpost, Gudiwada and a case in e No.93 of 2009 was registered against them under Section of Cr.P.C. and they were produced before the Mandal utive Magistrate, Gudiwada, on the same day and they were sed on bail on their executing a personal bond. It is further d that alleged detenu-Devarakonda Mahesh was arrested by wada Government Railway Police on 18.12.2009 and a case me No.95 of 2009 was registered against him and he was uced before the Mandal Executive Magistrate on 18.12.2009 subsequently, he was released on bail on his executing a nal bond. It is further stated that all the three alleged us went back to their native place at Ramnagar and upalem Village, Chirala Mandal, Prakasam District. On pt of notice by this Court, the Police made necessary local ries and produced Devarakonda Mallika before the Mandal utive Magistgrate, Chirala Mandal on 30.01.2010, and also uced Devarakonda Mahesh and Pendyam Bhaskar before Mandal Executive Magistrate, Chirala Mandal on 05.02.2010 heir statements were also recorded. It is further stated that e three detenus are now set at liberty and they are pursuing respective avocations in their native places. Since the ed detenus are now at liberty and are pursuing their ctive avocations, the cause of action for filing the writ petition not survive any longer. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having me infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA __________________________ JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY Dated:15th February, 2010 dr