- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.397 OF 2003 REVISION APPLICATION NO.397 OF 2003 REVISION APPLICATION NO.397 OF 2003 Mrityunjay S. Badigannavar ...Applicant vs. Mrs.Rudrambika M. Badigannavar & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Vishwanath Talkute for the Applicant Mr.I.M.Khairdi for the Respondent No.1 Ms M.M.Deshmukh,A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 17,2005 : OCTOBER 17,2005 : OCTOBER 17,2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Rule. Advocate for the Respondent No.1 waives service. Learned A.P.P. waives service for Respondent No.2. The Advocates for the Applicant and the Respondent No.1 have tendered on record consent minutes of order. The Advocates state that the Respondent No.1 and the Applicant are personally present in the Court and they have accepted the compromise recorded in the minutes of order. Minutes of order are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. 2. Revision Application is disposed of in terms of minutes of order. 3. Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of the order. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE