WP(C) 3819/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I A ANSARI Heard Mr. N. Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner’s grievance is that while functioning as a treasurer of K agaj Nigam Karmi Union, Nagaon Paper Mill, the petitioner has been removed from the said post, on disciplinary ground, by taking recourse to Clause 7(iv)(a) of the Constitution of the said trade union. Aggrieved by his removal, which, acco rding to the petitioner, is illegal, the petitioner has made a representation to the respondent No. 2, namely, General Secretary of the said trade union, but no remedial action has been taken yet by the respondents. It is in such circumsta nces that the petitioner ha filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Co nstitution of India. The dispute, in question, is a dispute between the petitioner, as a work man, on the one hand, and his trade union, on the other. Such a dispute is, adm ittedly, a trade-union dispute and the remedy of the petitioner lies in approach ing appropriate conciliation authority in accordance with law. While, in view of the above this writ petition is not admitted, the peti tioner is given the liberty to approach appropriate authority, namely, Labour Of ficer/ Conciliation Officer, Morigaon, for remedy of his grievance.