^, CvF }/y^j/^- //!// W. P. (S) No. !?^^ /2009 : ^Shri Vasudeo Verma S/o Late Swaminath Verma, Age about 47 years, ^'f^^' ' R//o ThakkarBabaKanyaAashram l.-'tV^ -^v.t^v'^ Narayanpur (C.G) ^<^.-,%.^ 4'7.r-n^"V^:- .....^y ^•^^>JS"V <%: '^s ^'"_ VERSUS \.^-' State ofChhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Bakward Class Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Commissioner, Tribal Development Raipur(C.G) 3. • The Secretary, MataRukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tah. & District-Jagdalpur (C.G.) coNsmimoN —-r HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON rS) No. 5313 of2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Shri Vasudeo Vei-ma. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITLrTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shi'i S.P.Kale, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lav^yer forthe State/respondents 1 & 2. QRDER(QRAL) (Passed on 17th day of September, 2009) Heard leaiiied counsel for the parties. 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decision ofthis Court rendered m Smt ALall v. State of ChhaUisgarh & Others1, thus the petitioner may be permitted to make a represeiitation to decide his case in the light of aforestated decisioiL subject to vei'ification asto whether the respondent No. 3-Institute is a Goveniment Aided school and the petitioner is a teacher within the sanctioned strength. 2. Leanied counsel appearing for the State submits that in the event- the petitioner makes a representation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law, within a period offour weeks from the date ofreceipt of the representation. 3. In view of foregoing, according to the leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly; the writ petition is disposed of Sd/- SatishK.Agnihott1 Judge Amit ' 2007 (l)BLJ 265