IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3207 of 2011 Decided on: 11th May, 2011. Nagender Kumar. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG, for respondents No.1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved since he has been replaced by the private respondent. The petitioner is PTA appointee and the private respondent is a regular teacher. According to the petitioner, he can work only in the place/school where he was appointed, whereas the private respondent, being a regular appointee, can work in any open vacancy. In case the petitioner can point out any suitable vacancies where the private respondent is willing to be accommodated, the petitioner may point out the same before the second respondent along with willingness/consent letter, in which case, the second respondent will take appropriate action within another one month. In case the petitioner is 2 otherwise eligible, he may be continued till he is otherwise replaced by a regular recruitee. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 11th May, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr) Judge. 3