IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 22229 of 2003 Between: Guntur Coop.Urban Bank Ltd., 3/2, Brodipet, Guntur, Rep.by its Chief Executive T.Laxminarayana, S/o.Sai Krishna Murthy, Guntur. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Vasundhara Coop.Urban Bank Ltd., Rep. by its Special Officer. Habsiguda, Hyderabad. 2 The Joint Registrar/District Coop.Officer, R.R.District. 3 Sub-Divisional Coop.Officer, Hayathnagar. R.R.District. 4 The Liquidators, The Vasundhara Coop.Urban Limited, Habsiguda, Hyderabad. R-4 implead as per court order dt: 28.4.2004, in WPMP 34100/2003. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any writ order or direction particularly one in the Nature of Mandamus declaring the order No.2881/03/C, dt.20-09-2003 of the 2nd respondent to the extent of restricting prohibitory orders against the deposits of Hyderabad District Coop.Central Bank Ltd., Nampalli and Ramanthapur against the schedule that is filed and also the inaction of the 3rd respondent in implementing these orders as arbitrary, illegal and direct the 2nd respondent to pass prohibiting orders in respect of other deposits held with other Banks also to protect the interests of Petitioner- Bank while directing 3rd respondent to implement the orders No.2881/03/C, dt.29-9-2003. Counsel for the Petitioner: DR.P.B.VIJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION FOR R2,3 MRCH.JANARDHAN REDDY FOR R1 The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P. No. 22229 of 2003 O R D E R: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequent to filing of the writ petition the 1st respondent-Bank went into liquidation and a Liquidator is appointed. Under those circumstances, adjudication of the issues in the writ petition may not arise. Hence, the writ petition is closed leaving liberty to the petitioner to workout the remedies before the Liquidator of the 1st respondent-Bank under Section 66 of the A.P.Cooperative Societies Act. JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU. Date: 18-6-2009. MVB.