IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 5328 of 2010 Decided on: 12.5.2011 Ravinder Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3 . . Mr.Rama Kant Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. None for respondent No. 5. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to subsequent developments. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge May 12, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No