1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.125 OF 2007 REVISION APPLICATION NO.125 OF 2007 REVISION APPLICATION NO.125 OF 2007 Mr.Milind Suryakant Pimple : Applicant. versus Mrs.Manali Milind Pimple & Anr. : Respondents. Mr.Sandesh Patil for the Applicant. Mr.Hemant Kenjalkar for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : J.N.PATEL & : J.N.PATEL & : J.N.PATEL & A.A.SAYED, A.A.SAYED, A.A.SAYED, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATED DATED DATED : OCTOBER 18, 2007. : OCTOBER 18, 2007. : OCTOBER 18, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The learned counsel for the parties submit that the matter has been settled and tender consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The parties are present in Court. The learned counsel submit that the consent terms are read over and explained to the 2 parties and understood by them. As per the consent terms, a Demand Draft of Rs.5,00,000/- dated 17/10/2007 bearing No.892257 drawn on HDFC Bank, Mumbai is handed over to the learned counsel for the wife by the learned counsel for the husband in Court. The said Demand Draft is drawn in the maiden name of wife i.e. Lata Arun Kurlekar. 2. The Criminal Revision Application is disposed of in accordance with the consent terms. The amount deposited in Court by the applicant/husband is permitted to be withdrawn by the applicant/husband. 3. The interim orders do not survive and the same stand vacated. [A.A.SAYED,J] [A.A.SAYED,J] [A.A.SAYED,J] [J.N.PATEL,J] [J.N.PATEL,J] [J.N.PATEL,J]