IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCAL AT NAINIAL WRIT PETITON NO.725 OF 2006 (M/S) 1. Dr. Sarveshawar Prasad Raturi son of Late SriGeeta Ram Raturi, R/o Mishra Bhawan, Near Krishi Bhawan Srinagar Road, Pauri, district Pauri Garhwal on behalf of his minor daughter Km. Anuradha Raturi. 2. Pushkar Singh Rawat son of late Sri T.S. Rawat, resident of P.N.B. Building Dhara Road Pauri , district Pauri Garhwal on behalf of his minor daughter Km. Srishti Rawat. …………….Petitioners. Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary Education, Secretariat, Subhash Road, Dehradun. 2. District Education Office, Pauri, district Pauri Garhwal. 3. Uttaranchal Intermediate and High School Education Board through Additional Secretary, Uttaranchal Examination Council, Ramnagar, district Nainital, Uttaranchal. …………Respondents. Sri Vinod Nautiyal, Advocate for the petitions. Ms. Sheema Sirohi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and C.S.C. for respondent No.3. Dated: June 15, 2006 HON’BLE RAJESH TANDON, J. By the present writ petition the petitioners have prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to issue the computerized mark sheet to the daughters of the petitioners. Briefly stated, the daughters of the petitioners appeared in the High School Examination of 2005. The examination was conducted by the Uttaranchal Intermediate and High School Board alongwith the roll numbers 0052732 and 0052768. The daughters of the petitioners have represented for computerized mark sheet and a direction was made by this Court on 22.3.2006 to the effect that the representation with regard to the computerized mark sheet may be given to them. The representation has been decided by order dated 10.05.2006. Paragraphs Nos. 4,5 and 6 of the said order are quoted below: “4.ijh{kkQy fuekZ.k dk dk;Z izfro"kZ fufonkvksa ds ek/;e ls p;fur QeksZa }kjk lafonk ds vk/kkj ij fd;k tkrk gS A ;g lafonk fu/kkZfjr le;kof/k ds fy, gh ekU; gksrh gSA mDr QeZ ds ikl miyC/k lkSQVos;j RkFkk ykbu fizUVj ls vad&i= eqnz.k dk;Z djk;k tkrk gSA lEizfr ifj’kn dk;kZy; esa ;g lqfo/kk miyC/k ugha gSA 5- lEcfU/kr QEkZ dks vad&i= eqnz.k gsrq izfUVax LVs’kujh dh fu/kkZfjr ek=k RkFkk fu/kkfjr dzekad dh LVs’kujh miyC/k djkbZ tkrh gSA vr% lEcfU/kr tuin ,ao fo|ky; dk vkaofVr dzekad dh LVs’kujh vc iqu% miyC/k ugha gks ldrh gS A 6- mijksDr dkj.kksa ls ,sls lHkh ekeyksa esa&ftuds ijh{kk ifj.kke fdUgha dkj.kksa ls :d tkrs gS vFkok ftudk ijh{kkQy lfUujh{kk ;k ifjrqyu ds QyLo:Ik izHkkfor gks tkrk gS vFkok uke bR;kfn esa la’kks/ku gksrk gS] gLrfyf[kr vad i= fuxZr fd;s tkrs gS A bu gLrfyf[kr vad&i=ksa dh oS/krk ,ao izekf.kdrk dEI;wVj }kjk eqfnzr vad&i= ds leku gksrh gSA** The grievance of the petitioners are that there should have been a sufficient software and line printer in order to accommodate all the candidates who appeared in the High School Examination. In view of the above computerized mark sheets may be provided as and when the software as well as line printer are available in the department preferably within a period of four months from the date of filing the certified copy of the order. Subject to aforesaid, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) 15.06.2006 Negi.