IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2010 / 18TH JYAISTHA 1932 Crl.MC.No. 744 of 2010() ------------------------ CC.889/2007 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-II, THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER(S): 2ND ACCUSED -------------------------- PUNCHIRI,W/O.ELENJIKKAL XAVIER, EDAVILANGU VILLAGE DESOM,KODUNGALLUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.JIJO PAUL RESPONDENT(S): STATE -------------------- THE STATE OFO KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THRISSUR WEST POLICE STATION, THORUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.KOCHI-31. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.S.U.NAZER THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.744 of 2010 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of June, 2010 ORDER Petitioner, who is the second accused in C.C.No.889/2007 on the file of the J.F.C.M Court-II, Thrissur for offences punishable under Sections 466 and 474 read with 34 IPC, seeks to quash Annexure D charge sheet and all other proceedings. 2. In fact, the petitioner had approached this Court on an early occasion against the order framing charge against her and as per Annexure I order dated 19.8.2009 this court dismissed the revision filed as Criminal R.P.No.706/2009. So, the proper course for the petitioner was to face the trial. In fact, the trial has started with the framing of the charge. If a question of identity does not arise for consideration during the trial, the petitioner may file an application incorporating appropriate averments seeking personal exemption. In case such a petition is filed, I am sure that the learned Magistrate will consider the same and pass appropriate orders. Reserving the above right of the petitioner this Criminal M.C is dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE dmb