IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2269/2009 [Tukaram Bhaiyyalal Renait ..vs..State of Maharashtra ] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------------------------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------------------------------------------------------- - -- CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR, J. DATE : 2nd July, 2009 Heard Shri Choudhari, advocate for the applicant and Shri Sonare APP for state. Interim order was passed on 23.6.2009 on the premises that name of applicant was not mentioned in the FIR. The FIR shows that there was suspicion against one Tukaram Renait amongst other accused. This is an application by one Tukaram Bhaiyyalal Renait. However, there was dispute as to whether statement Vinod Kawle who states that he had seen Dr. Renait running from the backside of the Bar immediately after the fire is the same person i.e. the applicant. It was the contention of the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not that person, therefore, that statement does not involve the present applicant. It is not the case of the applicant that the person mentioned in the FIR namely Tukaram Bhaiyyalal Renait and the applicant are two different persons. In these circumstances the application can not be granted. Same is rejected, however, two days time is granted to the applicant to surrender before the trial court. Till then interim order shall continue. Application stands disposed of. JUDGE smp.