IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.30189 of 1998 Between: The Principal, A.P.Residential School (G), Choutuppal, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Sri M.N.Narsi Reddy, Yerragaddagudem, Thipparthi Mandal, Nalgonda District. 2 Chairman Selection Committee, A.P. Residential School for Girls, Choutuppal, Nalgonda District. (R.2 are not necessary to this Writ Petition) 3 The District Employement Officer, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. (R.2 are not necessary to this Writ Petition) 4 The Registrar, A.P. Admn. Tribunal, Purani Haveli, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or direction or writ more particualrly one in the nature of Writ of CERTIORARI calling for teh records pertaining to the orders passed on 20-11-1997 in O.A.No. 7089/97 and the orders dt. 5-8- 1998 passed in M.A.No.680/98 in Rev.M.A.Sr.No.2345/98 in O.A.No.7089/97 and quash the same as ultravires and against the principles of natural justice Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION No.30189 of 1998 ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the order, dated 05- 08-1998 passed in O.A.No.7089 of 1997, whereby and whereunder the said O.A. filed by the 1st respondent herein was disposed of directing the petitioner herein to consider the case of the 1st respondent, provided he has applied in time for the recruitment to which he is eligible. Admittedly, the writ petition is dismissed for default against the 1st respondent on 30-11-2004. Therefore, we are of the opinion that the petitioner is not entitled for any relief. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J _____________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J Date: 16-06-2009 Prv