(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5175 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5175 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5175 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 738 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 738 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 738 OF 2005 R.S.A. Builders ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors ...Respondents ..... Mr. A.M. Sarogi, Advocate for Applicant Mr. M.S. Mohite, Adv.for original complainant. Mr. Rafique Peer Mohiddin, for R. No.2. Mr. D. P. Adsule, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 DATED: 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 DATED: 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant, learned advocate for the respondent-original complainant, Mr. Mohiddin for Rspondent No.2 and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 3. Sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay caused in filing Criminal Appeal No.738 of 2005. Moreover, the learned advocates for all the respondents have stated that they have no (-2-) objection to the delay being condoned. In this view of the matter, the delay is condoned. 4. Application is disposed of. 5. Place the appeal for admission on 5.10.2005. *****