IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3266 of 2008 DURYODHAN CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 7/5/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Miscellaneous Case No.19/06 corresponding to trial No.2578/06 under Sections- 205, 209, 468, 471 and 120B of I.P.C. Certain accused were granted bail. The bailor was one Rameshwar Mahto. On the day that he is stated to have signed the bail-bonds, he himself was in custody and an imposter appeared on his behalf. The petitioner was a practicing advocate who identified the impersonator as Rameshwar Mahto leading to the complaint by the court concerned. There are no allegations against the petitioner. The submission is that as a professional he discharged his duties based on instructions received by him unaware of the truth behind the curtain. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case let the petitioner Duryodhan Chaudhary surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R.C. Malviya, J.M., 1st Class, Bettiah, West Champaran in Misc.Case - 2 - No.19/06 giving rise to Trial No.2578/06, subject to the conditions laid down under Section- 438(2) of Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )