1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 4226 OF 2008 Balasaheb S/o Murlidhar Potghan and others Versus The State of Maharashtra and another. *** Mr. R. N. Dhore, Advocate i/b Mr. N. K. Choudhary, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. P. M. Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 4227 OF 2008 Sharad S/o Sukhadev Dalvi and others Versus The State of Maharashtra and another. *** Mr. R. N. Dhorde, Advocate i/b Mr. N. K. Choudhari, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. P. M. Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** 1. In a chequered history of litigation, to control the institution, the rival groups are throttling each other. Without adverting to who has prepared the false documents, the fact remains that it is specific allegation that Sharad Sukhadev Dalvi, one of the applicant, has allegedly forged the papers. 2. At this stage, learned counsel, on instructions, withdraws the application of Sharad S/o Sukhadev Dalvi. Accordingly, it is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of. 3. So far as other applicants are concerned, they 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. are either employees and teachers, they are permanent resident of the villages. Reading the F.I.R. as a whole no specific role could have been attributed. 4. The specimen signatures of the accused/ applicants are with the police. However, nothing is done since 2006. The alleged offence of placing forged document with the Assistant Charity Commissioner is also of 2006. The investigator could easily collect the relevant papers, including the letter of forged signature. However, no such exercise is done. Custodial interrogation of the applicants in Application No.4226 of 2008 and applicant No.2 Hanumant S/o Genuji Lotake and Applicant No.3 Raghunath S/o Rangnath Thanage is not warranted. They will be attending the concerned police to coordinate with the investigator. Hence, order. 5. In the event of arrest of the accused/ applicant Balasaheb S/o Murlidhar Potghan and other two applicants in Criminal Application No.4226 of 2008 and applicant Nos.2 and 3 in Application NO.4227 of 2008 [Hanumanth S/o Gunaji Lotke and Raghunath S/o Rangnath Thanage, respectively], they be released on 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. their furnishing P.R.Bond and surety in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- [Rupees ten thousands only] each. 6. The applicants herein shall attend the concerned police station on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m. to 05.00 p.m. for a period of six months. 7. The accused/ applicant, if required, shall furnish their specimen signatures or writings to the satisfaction of the investigator. 8. The accused/ applicant shall not influence the witnesses and shall not tamper with the record. 9. The application of accused/ applicant Sharad Sukhadev Dalvi is disposed of being withdrawn. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:18/08/2009. ans/4226