IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN THURSDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2010 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 9161 of 2010(O) ------------------------- OS.719/2003 of PRL.SUB COURT,THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- MOHAMMED.A.NIZAR @ NAZER KADAVANTHOT, S/O.KAMMUKUTTY HAJI, KADAVANTHOT HOUSE, P.O.KURANNIYUR, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR.T.A.SHAJI RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- THE MATHRUBHUMI PRINTING & PUBLISHING COMPANY LTD., MATHRUBHUMI BUILDINGS, K.P.KESAVA MENON ROAD, CALICUT- 673 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, M.P.VEERENDRA KUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P. BHAVADASAN, J. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= W.P.(C) No. 9161 of 2010 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= Dated this the 18th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Complaint in this writ petition is that the petitioner has not received carbon copies of the orders as applied for in Exts.P11, P12 and P13 to take further steps in the matter. 2. The petitioner is the defendant in O.S. No.719 of 2003 on the file of th Principal Sub Court, Thrissur. According to him, as he was out of station, ex parte decree was passed. When he came to know about the decree, according to him, he filed two petitions; one to set aside the ex parte decree and another to condone the delay in filing the petition to set aside the ex parte decree. He also filed an application to stay of the execution proceedings. It is now stated that the petition to condone the delay in filing the petition to set aside the ex parte decree was dismissed on 15-3-2010. Even though the petitioner applied for a carbon W.P.(C) No. 9161/10 2 copy of the order, it has not so far been issued. In the mean while, it is stated, the execution proceedings are initiated. He, therefore, prays for the direction to the court below to issue a carbon copy of the orders as applied for and till then execution proceedings may be kept in abeyance. 3. In the light of the order that is sought to be passed, notice to the respondent is not necessary. 4. Considering the averments, it is felt that the prayer is just and reasonable. 5. Hence, there will be a direction to the Principal Sub Court, Thrissur to issue carbon copy of the orders in I.A. Nos.9478 and 9479 of 2009 and order dated 15-2-2010 within ten days from today. E.P. No.270 of 2007 pending before the Addl. Sub Court, Thrissur shall stand adjourned for two weeks. The writ petition is disposed of as above. P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. mn.