IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 15TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3703 of 2011(K) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- S.VASANTHA MARY, W/O.ALBERT ALEXANDER, AGED 50, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, ST.PAUL'S HIGH SCHOOL, KOZHINJAMPARA, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANILAL SRI.S.NIDHEESH RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 001 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678001. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678001. 5. THE MANAGER, ST.PAULS HIGH SCHOOL, KOZHINJAMPARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678001. 6. SMT.M.PHILO, HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (SOCIAL STUDIES), ST.PAULS HIGH SCHOOL, KOZHINJAMPARA, PALAKKAD-678555. R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/02/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.3703 Of 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 4th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is presently working as a UPSA. It is stated that the petitioner is entitled to be promoted as HSA(Social Science) as she is fully qualified. A vacancy arose in the school on 31.3.2010. The management appointed the 6th respondent in the vacancy as per Exhibit P1 order. The said appointment has been approved also. The petitioner, even though raised a claim, the same was rejected as per Exhibit P4 order passed by the Director of Public Instructions. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed a revision petition before the Government as per Exhibit P7. It is prayed that the Revision Petition may be directed to be disposed of within a time frame. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 4. 3. There will be a direction to respondents 1 to 4 to take a decision on Exhibit P7, after hearing the petitioner and respondents 5 and 6 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will W.P.(C)No. 3703/11 -2- produce a copy of the Writ Petition along with a copy of this judgment for compliance. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn True copy P.A.to Judge