IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (DB) No.916 of 2011 Maharaj Verma, Son of Sraju Prasad Verma, Resident of Village- Titai Bigha, P.O.-Pawai, P.S.-Aurangabad (M), District- Aurangabad. …..Appellant. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Madan Ram, Son of Late Ramdeo Ram 3. Dharmendar Ram @ Rajkumar, Son of Late Ramdeo Ram 4. Basant Ram, Son of Late Sukhlal Ram 5. Manoj Ram, Son of Esary Ram 6. Sukhdar Ram @ Subedar Ram, Son of Bramha Ram 7. Baban Ram, Son of Late Girwar Ram 8. Amlesh Ram, Son of Late Sukhlal Ram 9. Sheo Ram, Son of Late Lalmohan Ram All of accused Village-Titai Bigha, P.S.-Aurangabad (M), District-Aurangabad. …..Respondents. For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : APP. ---------------------------------- 03/ 27.09.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the Appellant and learned Counsel for the State. The appellant has challenged the judgment dated 15.07.2011 passed in Sessions Trial No. 215 of 2002 by learned Sessions Judge, Aurangabad whereby the accused/respondents have been acquitted under Sections 307/149 of the Indian Penal Code. Respondent Madan Ram and Dharmendar Ram were found guilty under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code but their sentences have been reduced to the period already undergone by them. The Sessions Judge has given reasoning as to why the case under Section 2 324 of the Indian Penal Code was made out. There was no evidence before him on the basis which he could have come to the opinion that offence comes under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. The judgment is well discussed and correct. We find no reason to interfere with the judgment impugned. The appeal is dismissed. kksinha/- (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)