IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2011 / 21ST ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 27054 of 2011(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- BHASKAR SHARMA.N., AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.P.N.NEELAKANDAN, NANDEDATH ILLAM, NADUVATTOM P.O., PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SAJEEV SRI.CIBI K.CHERIAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY P.O., CALICUT, PIN-673 635. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, UNIVERSITY P.O., CALICUT, PIN-673 635. SC SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 27054 of 2011 APPENDIX EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DATED 29.2.2011 EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT NO.985851 DATED 30.9.2011 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT NO.985852 DATED 30.9.2011 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT (True copy) P.A To Judge ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).27054/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 13th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioner applied for revaluation of the failes answer scripts in the 6th semester B.Tech Civil Engineering Examination vide Ext.P1 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. 4.Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs