IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2009 / 18TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 18897 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.SAFIYA, PARAKKAL, P.O.VILATHUR, THIRUVEGAPURA, PALAKKAD DIST. BY ADV. SRI.STALIN PETER DAVIS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE R.D.O., OTTAPALAM. 2. NAFISA, PARAPURATH, P.O.VILATHUR, THIRUVEGAPURA, PALAKKAD DIST. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.R.SREELATHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.18897 of 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner alleges that the building belonging to the 2nd respondent, a neighbouring property owner, is situated in such a condition that it causes danger to the petitioner and her family members. She has brought it to the notice of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ottapalam vide Ext.P3, which is pending consideration. In the circumstances, the 1st respondent shall proceed to consider Ext.P3 and take appropriate action. If on enquiry it is found that the allegations are correct, then a conditional order shall be passed by the 1st respondent and he shall then proceed to take action, after notice to the 2nd respondent also. An appropriate order on Ext.P3, either deciding to issue a W.P.(C).No.18897 of 2009 :: 2 :: conditional order or dropping the proceedings, as the case may be, shall be passed within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge