1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1686/2010 ( Mohd. Ezaz S/o Mohd. Sheikh -: VERSUS :- The Divisional Jt. Registrar, Co-op. Societies and others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri C.F. Bhagwani, Adv. for petitioner. Shri J.B. Jaiswal, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. Shri A.K. Chandak., Adv. for respondent no.2. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 28, 2010. Heard Adv. Shri Bhagwani for petitioner, Shri Jaiswal A.G.P. for respondent no.1 and Adv. Shri Chandak for respondent no.2. Since 23/11/2006 petitioner has raised objection before respondent no.1 that respondent no.2 is a Mutli-State Co-operative Society and hence the recovery under section 101 was not possible. That objection according to Adv. Shri Bhagwani has not been decided. Learned A.G.P. states that though the objection has not been dealt with specifically, the Assistant Registrar has mentioned the consideration of challenge in R.R.C. Adv. Shri Chandak for respondent no.2 supports the order. He further states that respondent no.2 has become a Multi-State Co-operative Society in 2008. 2 With the assistance of respective counsel I perused the papers. Petitioner has raised the objection in 2006 itself and that objection has not been even mentioned by Assistant Registrar while issuing R.R.C. The nature of that objection and reply thereto does not find mention in the impugned order. Before Assistant Registrar or Divisional Registrar or even before this Court respondents have not produced anything to show that respondent has become a Multi-State Co-operative Society in 2008. In this situation, the impugned order of issuance of R.R.C. is set aside. The matter is restored to the file of Assistant Registrar, Nagpur. The parties shall appear before him on 12th of August 2010. The respondent no.2 shall produce necessary documents to show its status. The Assistant Registrar, Nagpur shall consider the same and pass further orders in the matter as early as possible and in any case by 30th of August 2010. Rule Accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE Tambaskar.