... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3787 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3787 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3787 OF 2006 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.19592 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.19592 OF 2006 FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.19592 OF 2006 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri R.M.Pethe i/by Shri R.G.Ketkar for the Applicant. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : JANUARY 15, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 15, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 15, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Rule returnable on 02nd March, 2007. In addition to service of notice through court, Advocate for the Applicant to serve private notice to the first and second Respondents and file affidavit of service before the returnable date. If compliance is not made, Application will stand dismissed for want of prosecution. 2. The learned Advocate for the Applicant states that the entire amount due and payable as per the impugned Judgment and Award has been deposited by the Applicant. ... 2 ... Hence, till next date there will be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a). In the meanwhile, the Tribunal will permit the first and second Respondents to withdraw a sum of Rs.50,000/- each without any security. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE