1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10490 OF 2009 Shivlila Sahakari Dudh Utpadak Sanstha maryadit, Ranjani & Anr. ... Petitioners Vs. Shetkari Sahakari Dudh Utpadak Purvatha Sangh Maryadit & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. A.M.Kulkarni, Advocate,for the petitioners. Mr. Mr. Umesh Mankapure, Advocate,for respndent No.1. Mr. V.S.Masurkar, Govt. Pleader, for respondent Nos. 2 & 3. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 15th December, 2009. P.C. 1. Though the Administrator was appointed, the respondent No.1 Society called a General Body Meeting wherein amendments were proposed to the bye-laws. The petitioners were also participants in the said meeting. They participated in the said meeting and the amendments thereafter were forwarded to the Registrar in terms of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, who has certified the amendments. In our opinion, considering that it was an unanimous decision of the General Body, otherwise there was no legal infirmity and no 2 interference is called of. The petition is rejected. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)