^ rw'T. ^t^ / IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CAS.£ CCiv'it CONTEMPT I'E'FITEQNE^ N0. ^._/2011 PETITIONERS ^.^^k .-<y.-''^<^^ ^r\.^ ^?;^<^' ^^^t o^^- ..^i^SI^ ^ ^^ /, '^" ^ ^ ^' / 'y'\ l'^' f.^ ... ^ ^ Y'^\ 1 '•* t ^^. X^M?j' s e l' :^ f.. Yashwant Patel, son of Shri L.S. Patel, aged 43 years, Occupation - Service, Presently posted as Assistant braughtsman, C.Gj. Housing Board, Raipur, resident of Netaji Chowk, New Shanti Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. S.P. Raikwar, son of Shri R.L. ( Raikwar, aged 40 years, Occupation-Service, Presently posted as /\ssistant Grade-III, C.&. Housing Board, Raipur, resident of25, Near Kali Mandir, Pandri Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ^. &.N\. bubey, son of Late Shn" R.P. Dubey, aged 50 years, Occupation —Service, Presently posted as Account Assistant, C.&. Housing Board, Raipur, resident of near the office of C.G. 6rih Nirman Mandal, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (CG) Vs 2^ RESPONDENTS : 1. Shri N. Baijendra Kumar, CONTEMNORS Principal Secretary, Hoysing and Environmental Department, b.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. 2. Shn' B. Anand Babu, Commissioner, C.6. Grih Nirman Mandal, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C6) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTIONTTzOF THE CONTEA^T OF COURTS ACT REAb WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA '^^ :C-22 3:fI^T'^T f<<ii<=b 3T1^T $t)^icr) ^f^a 7' Deepti •^^r ^qrqi^pT, '^hm^, ft«vii^Li< © 3Ti^T XT?T^ <S^o 'WRC'TT 5b^ich ^iA^. oQ|n 200 ^s^vs' ^RT'^r?^R ^rf^T SB: Hon'bie Shri Manindra Wtoha 07-01-2011 counl^l for the petitioners. t(l Shri Malay Shrivastava, Heard on admission. Learned counsel for the petjtioners Court had directed the respondentsl of the petitioners with regard to the| of extending benefrt of revised pay-|sca3e Pay Commission and it was expec|ted and 3 shall decide the matter exped|tiously. Leamed counsel for the pe|itjoners than four months have etapsed, decided. This Court had not passed that the matter shall be decided exrieditiously has elapsed, at this moment, it made out. If the respondents do not tal| the petitioners within a reasonable revive the petition. The petitioners order passed in this case. With the aforesaid observatiohs, off. submits that on 19/08/2010, thjs to consider and decide his representatfon |r claim for simitar treatment in the matter as per the reoommendations of 6 by this Court that respondents No.2 'chi^i<v1<fl'l 'RT7?^"? "feT^ <P?t«l< '^^f^w^n^T 1 Shrivastava. J. submite that even though more date, the matter has not been l|nally canhot |any time bound order but had expected Considering fte period which be said that any contempt has been |;e any decision on the representeition of [ime, the petitioneis wouid be at iiberty to bring to the notice of respondents, the m|ay , the contempt case is finaliy disposed Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [xft^ zfe^