IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23292 of 2010 1. PURUSOTTAM YADAV @ PRASOTAM YADAV 2. Laxman Yadav 3. Parmatma Yadav Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 12.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are not the assailants of the deceased. Petitioners no.1 and 2 are assailants of informant by means of garasa and bhala. He was admitted to hospital is nowhere mentioned rather fardbeyan even was recorded near his door. Petitioner no. 3 is assailant of informant’s sister-in-law (Bhabhi) by means of lathi but not examined by the Doctor. They are said made accused due to being witness in a case filed by the accused persons against informant’s party vide Ara Muffasil P.S. Case No. 102 of 2007. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Ara Muffasil P.S. Case No. 203 of 2009 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Ara, Bhojpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)