FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directios and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 902 FIRST APPEAL NO. 466 OF 2010 RAMDAS DASHRATH BHOR VERSUS BALASAHEB PUNJAJI JAGDALE ... Advocate for appellant : Mr. Gaware Niteen V. Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.M. Karad ... CORAM : A. V. POTDAR, J. Dated: December 01, 2011 ... PER COURT : 1. Learned counsel for appellant and respondent alongwith their respective clients are present. It is stated across the bar that the respondent herein has filed suit for specific performance, which came to be decreed and the judgment and decree passed in Special Civil Suit No. 284/2008 is impugned in the first appeal. It is further stated across the bar that during the pendency of this appeal, parties arrived at amicable settlement and accordingly, on 24-06-2011 joint compromise pursis was filed before the Court. It is further stated that even though compromise pursis was filed before this Court, terms and conditions stated therein were not complied with for some reason or the other. Now the terms and conditions mentioned in the compromise pursis filed before the Court are finally settled. Hence, today fresh pursis is filed before the Court duly signed by appellant and respondent who are identified by the FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directios and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS respective counsel. On questioning the appellant and respondent they state that they have understood contents of compromise pursis filed on 24-6-2011 so also pursis placed on record today. Contents of compromise terms dated 24-6-2011 so also today filed are readover and explained to them in Marathi language by their respective counsel, which they have understood and admitted that they have voluntarily filed this compromise before this Court and for this no force or undue influence was used on them. In view of this, compromise deed dated 24-6-2011 so also pursis filed today are accepted. 2. In the light of this, instant first appeal stands disposed of in terms of compromise deed dated 24-6-2011. Decree be drawn in terms of compromise pursis. ( A. V. POTDAR, J. ) ... dyb