IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 366 of 2006 (S/B) L.K. Verma S/o Sri M.M. Verma, R/o C/o Sri B.R. Arya (Forest Ranger), Gayatri Nagar, Damua Dhunga, Kathgodam, Nainital. …….. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Principal Secretary, Labour, Dehradun. 2. Labour Commissioner, Uttaranchal, Shram Bhawan, Haldwani, District Nainital. 3. H.M.T. Ltd., H.M.T. Bhawan, 59 Bellari Road, Bangalore, through its Director. ……… Respondents Mr. Gopal Narain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.B. Tewari, Addl. Advocate General / Chief Standing Counsel with Mr. Nanak Chand Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Shailendra Noliyal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. V.K. Bist, Senior Counsel for respondent No. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Gopal Narain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.B. Tewari, Addl. Advocate General / Chief Standing Counsel with Mr. Nanak Chand Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Shailendra Noliyal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. V.K. Bist, Senior Counsel for respondent No. 3. 2. Mr. Gopal Narain, the learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of some developments in the matter after the filing of the writ petition, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty of filing another writ petition, if the future developments so warrant. 3. Permission granted. 4. With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Consequently, CLMA No. 14952 of 2006 also stands dismissed as withdrawn. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 15.12.2006 15.12.2006 G