IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-20533 of 2011 Date of Decision:28.07.2011 Amandeep Singh @ Goldy . . .Petitioner Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.R.S. Budhwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This is a petition for bail in a pending trial case registered vide FIR No.34 dated 31.03.2011 under Sections 307, 323, 324 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) at Police Station Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar. Learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly stated that the role attributed to the petitioner is similar to the role attributed to Rinku, who had earlier applied for regular bail before this Court in CRM-M-20209 of 2011 but the same has been dismissed on 8.7.2011. In view of the fact that the role attributed to the petitioner is similar to the role attributed to Rinku, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of bail. Hence, the petition is hereby dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JULY 28, 2011 JUDGE Vivek