THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. No. 3815 of 2010 O r d e r: This C.R.P. is directed against the order dated 27.07.2010, passed by the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District, dismissing the application in I.A. No. 393 of 2010 in O.S. No. 385 of 2008, filed by the petitioners, praying to receive the documents as per the list appended thereto. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order under revision. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as the whole set of documents were misplaced they could not file them along with the written statement, and as they could trace them recently, they may be permitted to file them, to evidence their title to the suit schedule property. This submission of the petitioners cannot be accepted. The suit is of the year 2003 (transferred to the present court and renumbered). The suit is at the stage of evidence. The evidence of the respondents- plaintiffs is complete. The evidence of D.W.1 on the side of the petitioners is complete, and D.W.2 filed his examination-in-chief. At that point of time, the petitioner filed the present application. The petitioners, admittedly, filed the written statement in the suit on 16.07.2003. Though the petitioners contend that the original documents are misplaced, the fact remains, there is no pleading in the written statement about the misplacement of the original documents. If according to the petitioners the original documents were lost and they could not file them along with the written statement, they could have obtained the certified copies of the same, which they seek to file, at an earlier point of time. The petitioners instead of doing that, filed the present application after the evidence of the respondents is closed and when the suit is coming up for the evidence of D.W.2, who filed his affidavit-in-chief. This apart, the injunction applications, was said to have been disposed of without any documents. In the absence of any convincing reason by the petitioners for their not filing the documents now sought to be filed at an earlier point of time, at least immediately after filing the written statement and in the absence of any pleading in the written statement about the misplacement of the original documents, no exception can be taken to the order under revision, passed by the Court below dismissing the application filed by the petitioners praying to permit them to file documents to prove their title to the property. For the foregoing reasons, I find no reason whatsoever to interfere therewith in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under article 227 of the Constitution of India. There is no merit in the C.R.P. and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 15th September, 2010 KSR