IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.388 of 2005 (M/S) Bishan Lal …….. Petitioner Versus Addl. District Judge/ III Fast Track Court, Haridwar and others …….. Respondents ………. Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate on behalf of Mr. A.K.Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C.J. Vide Impugned order dated 20.05.2004, the learned Trial Court decided issue no. 1 against the petitioner by holding that the valuation of the suit should be based on the value of the property as at the time of the filing of the suit and not at the time the property was initially purchased. This view has been upheld by the learned District Judge in the impugned order dated 29.12.2004. I find that both the orders have rightly been passed by the learned Courts below. No interference is warranted. The petition is dismissed in limine. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 18.03.2009 A