Crl.M.No.M-10982 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-10982 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 19, 2010 Paramjit Singh and another .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.J.S.Thind, Advocate and Ms.Rupinder K.Thind, Advocate for the petitioners. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.87, dated 19.2.2010, under Sections 380/427/506/420/467/468/471 and 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Amritsar City, District Amritsar. Heard. Brief facts of the case are that Sham Sunder, father of co- accused Subhash Chand Kapoor had taken loan from Punjab National Bank and the loan was not repaid. The property was mortgaged with the bank. The same was put to auction by the Court and the auction was also confirmed in favour of complainant- Shiv Kumar, Objections of LRs of Sham Sunder, i.e., co-accused, Subhash Chand Kapoor were also dismissed by learned Court. Despite that co-accused Subhash Chand Kapoor, in connivance with present petitioners sold the property in dispute to the present petitioners and the building was also demolished. On the similar facts, anticipatory bail application of co-accused Subhash Chand Kapoor was also dismissed by this Court in Crl. M.No.M-10757 of 2010 vide order dated 9.4.2010. Hence, in view of these facts, it is not such a case in which benefit of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners-accused. Crl.M.No.M-10982 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Hence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioners-Paramjit Singh and Charanjit Kaur, is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 19.4.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge