t_ IN THE COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASFUE Contempt Petition No. (-^'- / 2004 Sillfli& 6 j-'Vlk JaRe.Bhw-er Daa Vaishiiav, .^7i .i\ycv^ v^y r ,.t" /^^ €/y ^yjy 8/0 Late Shri R. D. Vaisbs.ma, aged about 50 years, Occupation- WQrktag as Upper DTviaion Teach.er, at Govt, Higiier Secoiidaty ScliQol^ PhafashRa.Qii^ Narayanpur, R,' o Pachri Para, Durg lC.O-.i Shi'i Diiiesh Kiiniat- Shriva.st.ava,, Collector. Bastai", Bastar (Jagdalpur) (C.G.}. COI.rTEMPT' PE-TITION UNDER ARTICLE afs OF THg C.OHSTrTUTION OF INDIA READ ¥/ITHSECTION 10 OF THE OF COURTS ACT. Versus RESPONDENT ^liSSLt^fa^id s HiQH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR: CHHATT8SGARH Ta?3Si^3^ le Shri H.L. Da Petition No.1560F Vs. ,'ageshwar Das Vaishnav Shri Dinesh Kumar Shrivastava Present: Shri Sankalp Jaiswai, counsel for the petitioner. (Passed on 27' February, 2007) The compiainant alleges that the respondent has willfuliy and deliberateiv disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court while disposing ofthe Writ Petition No.2344 of 2004, dated 13.09.2004. (2) This Court white disposing of the v/rit petition had permitted the petitioner to make a representation before the respondent within 10 davs from the date of the order for redressa! of ali his grievances, and further directed the resoondent to consider the representation that may be fiied by the petitioner in accordance w'th iaw. (3) The case of the petitioner before this Court is that, the respondent has not considered the rspresentation filed by the petitioner as directed by this Court. Therefore, it is asserted that the responden't has wiSifully and deliberately disobeved the orders and directlons issued / thls Court. (4) Aiong with the contempt petition, ths petitioner has produced two ietters which according to the petitioner are the representations sent to the respondent. The Detitioner has not -A' produced any acknowledgment of the respondent ha'.'ing been sewed With the order passed by this Court in the writ petition. It is for the petitioner to produce all fhe materiais before fhis Court firstiy to demonstrate when the respondent was made known the order passed by this Court. It is only thereafter that the petitionsr can aliege that in spite of the knowledge of the C-ourt order the respondent has not complisd with the orders and directions issued bv this C-ourt. in the absence of such materiais this Court cannot taks coanizance of the contempt petition filed by the petitioner. (5) Accordingiy, the petition requires to be rejected and it is accordingiv reiected. Ordered accordinsly. ————.— Sd/- Chief Justice [:^8.