IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9163 of 2003 Between : 1 M/s. VCS Raju & Company, ( A Registered partnership Firm). Plot No. 197, 50-102-10, TPR Colony, NE, Visakhapatnam - 530 013, Rep. by its Executive Partner V.C.S. Raju. 2 Mohan Reddy S/O Gurivi Reddy Gopavaram Grama Panchyat, Gopavaram Proddutur (M) Cuddapah. 3 Smt. Avalamma Guramma, W/o BalReddy Gopavaram Grampanchyat Gopavaram Proddutur (M) Cuddapah. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Union of India, Rep. by its Dy. Director General and Chief Engineer, Director General, Naval Projects, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2 The Cheif Engineer (RWS), Panchayat Raj Erramunzil Colony, Hyderabad The Cheif Engineer (RWS), Panchayat Raj Erramunzil Colony, Hyderabad 3 The Superintending Engineer (RWS) Panchyat Raj, Cuddapah The Superintending Engineer (RWS) Panchyat Raj, Cuddapah 4 Maruthi Tubes Pvt Ltd., Rep by K.V. Subba Reddy, Secunderabad Maruthi Tubes Pvt Ltd., Rep by K.V. Subba Reddy, Secunderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to declare the action of the respondent herein in terminating the Contract No. DDG&CE(V) 06 of 2001-2002 vide the impugned proceeding No. DG/2222/GE(S)2/250/E8 dt. 30.5.2003 as arbitrary, illegal offending Article 14 of the Constitution of India by way of issue of a writ order or direction, one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to complete the execution of the Contract. Counsel for the Petitioners : MR.S.SRI RAM Counsel for the Respondents : MR.T.SURYA KARAN REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER : It is represented by learned Counsel Sri G.Srinivas, representing learned counsel for petitioners on record Sri S.Sri Ram, that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 15th June 2009 ajr