IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8122 of 2010 1. PARSHU RAM SAH, MANAGER, KANKUBJ VAISHYA DHARAMSALA BRAHMPUR CHAURASTA, P.S. AND P.O. BRAHAMPUR, DISTT.- BUXAR – Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION, BIHAR, PATNA 3. SRI KRISHNA SAH S/O LATE BASUDEO SAH R/O VILL.- NIMEJ, P.O. NIMEJ, P.S. BRAHMPUR, DISTT.- BUXAR 4. RAM KISHUN SAH S/O LATE BASUDEO SAH R/O VILL.- NIMEJ, P.O. NIMEJ, P.S. BRAHMPUR, DISTT.- BUXAR 5. CHHOTAK SAH S/O LATE BISHNU SAH R/O VILL.- NIMEJ, P.O. NIMEJ, P.S. BRAHMPUR, DISTT.- BUXAR 6. HIRA LAL SAH S/O LATE BISHNU SAH R/O VILL.- NIMEJ, P.O. NIMEJ, P.S. BRAHMPUR, DISTT.- BUXAR 7. SAMBHU SAH S/O LATE BISHNU SAH R/O VILL.- NIMEJ, P.O. NIMEJ, P.S. BRAHMPUR, DISTT.- BUXAR 8. BHIKHARI SAH S/O LATE SURAJ SAH R/O VILL.- NIMEJ, P.O. NIMEJ, P.S. BRAHMPUR, DISTT.- BUXAR 9. BAIJ NATH SAH S/O SHASHI DHAR SAH R/O VILL.- NIMEJ, P.S. AND P.O. BRAHMPUR, DISTT.- BUXAR 10. BIKRAMA SAH S/O SHASHI DHAR SAH R/O VILL.- NIMEJ, P.S. AND P.O. BRAHMPUR, DISTT.- BUXAR – Respondents. ----------- 2 25.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order, dated 26.11.2009 passed by the Director Consolidation, Bihar, Patna directing that the order of Consolidation Officer should be implemented and the entries made in the name of ancestors of respondents 2nd set should be restored. The petitioner is member of Kanu Samaj and states that the land was gifted by the ancestors of respondents 2nd set to the Samaj for religious purposes and Dharmshala was also constructed on it. T.S. No. 193/2005 was filed by Kanu Samaj impleading respondents 2nd set and other concerned parties in the suit. The fact whether the oral gift in favour of the writ petitioner was valid and acted upon would naturally be considered by the court hearing the 2 suit. I, therefore, direct that any entries made in the revenue records would be subject to the decision of the suit. The court hearing the title suit should apply its independent mind and not be prejudiced or influenced by the order passed in favour of respondent 2nd set in Revision Case No. 205/2008. This writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)