IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38252 of 2010 LALJI PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 02. 27.10.2010 The petitioner being the informant and father of the victim has filed the present application for cancellation of bail of O.P. No. 2, husband of the victim who was granted bail on 12.08.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 29201 of 2010. The cancellation application has been preferred basically on two grounds. Firstly that the threatening is being given by the in-laws family of the victim and the Investigating Agency has not properly conducted the investigation. Initially the case was registered under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act, but subsequently the chargesheet was submitted under Section 498A read with Section 34 of the I.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner brought the only document on record after grant of bail to O.P. No. 2 is the letter dated 4th September, 2010 transmitted by the petitioner to the Officer-in-charge, Chakki O.P. under Brahampur P.S. of Buxar district through registered post in which it is alleged that the in-laws family threatened the informant side on the basis of O.P. No. 2 being granted 2 bail. There is nothing on record to suggest that any substantive case was lodged for threatening or the learned Trial Court was informed. Hence the document on record and the submissions do not inspire confidence. So far as the misdirected investigation by the police is concerned, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that a criminal writ has been filed. But since the counsel for the petitioner admits that the chargesheet has been submitted in the matter, hence now raising any grievance against the I.O. becomes meaningless. Moreover the latches on the part of the investigating agency can not be a ground for cancellation of bail. The parameters for cancellation of bail are quite different from that of grant of bail. From the materials on record, I do not find that petitioner has been able to prima facie suggest that O.P. No. 2 has misused the privilege of bail, hence I am not inclined to interfere with the bail order dated 12.08.2010. The application stands dismissed. However, learned Court below may take steps to expedite the trial. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)