1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 195 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 195 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 195 OF 2006 Manik Vithal Kadam ... Petitioner Versus The Comandant Army Base Workshop Khadki and anr. ... Respondents Mr. P.B. Shah for Petitioner. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DATED : JANUARY 31, 2006 DATED : JANUARY 31, 2006 DATED : JANUARY 31, 2006 P.C. . The Petitioner joined services on 7.6.1983. Pursuant to the departmental enquiry his services came to be terminated on 21.10.1994. That was subject matter of the Original Application which has been dismissed on 23.1.2002. It is the contention of the Petitioner that the punishment imposed considering the charge is disproportionate and in these circumstances, this court ought to interfere with the said punishment. . We have considered the records of the case and the findings of the Enquiry Officer. It is clear 2 that the Petitioner collected money from the co-workers of the chit fund known as Panchratna Lucky Draw scheme of which his brother was one of the partners. The workers who had lost the money, complained, based on which the enquiry was conducted. In that enquiry the Petitioner was found guilty and consequently the punishment. . Considering the findings of the Enquiry Officer and the decision by the Disciplinary Authority, we do not find this to be a fit case where we should interfere with the order passed. The order of C.A.T. does not suffer form an error apparent on the face of record. No interference is called for. Petition rejected. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.)