IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2286 of 2010 ARJUN YADAV, SON OF MURARI YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-KHARKATWA, P.S. SOHODARA, DISTRICT- WEST CHAMPARAN...........(ACCUSED)………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…………………….OPPOSITE PARTY. ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Satyapal Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. U.S.P. Singh, A.P.P. ---------- 3. 23.4.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though he is named accused in a case of murder but the motive for killing has not been assigned by any one which indicates towards the false implication of the petitioner. Learned A.P.P. for the State submits that the informant, who claims to be the eye witness, has clearly stated that the petitioner had fired upon his son, who died due to injury sustained by him caused by fire arms and the - 2 - post-mortem report supports the allegation. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case and also considering that the petitioner is the assailant of the deceased, according to the informant, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. As a result, this application is dismissed. However, the trial court is directed to take every step for expeditious disposal of the concerned trial. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)