IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 17TH BHADRA 1931 OP.No. 30182 of 2002(R) ----------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- LALITHA W/O. LATE NARAYANAN, VALLOOR THEKKATHIL VEEDU, ADINAD SOUTH, KATTILKADAVU P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.V.N.ACHUTHA KURUP, SENIOR ADVOCATE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KOLLAM 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL MAJOR SECTION, KARUNAGAPPALLY SOUTH, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. V. BABU, VALLOOR THEKKETHIL HOUSE, ADINAD SOUTH, KATIKKADAVU P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN, SC FOR K.S.E.B FOR R2 SRI.K.G.BALASUBRAMANIAN FOR R3 SMT.K.SUNITHA VINOD FOR R3 SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU FOR R3 SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM, SC, KSEB FOR R2 THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== O.P.No. 30182 of 2002 ================== Dated this the 8th day of September, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P3 order of the Additional District Magistrate, Kollam, wherein the Additional District Magistrate permitted the 2nd respondent to restore the weather proof line to the 3rd respondent's house for supply of electricity, which was burnt in a fire. The line was an existing one which was drawn with the consent of the petitioner and her husband late Narayanan. When that line was damaged on account of a fire, the 2nd respondent tried to restore the line, which was objected to by the petitioner, as a result of which, the matter was referred to the Additional District Magistrate, Kollam, who, by Ext.P3 oder, permitted drawing of such line. The petitioner is challenging Ext.P3 order in this original petition. 2. This original petition was filed on 17.10.2002. The petitioner has not been able to obtain any interim order. 3. In so far as the original line was drawn with the consent of the petitioner and her husband, when that line, which was damaged on account of a fire, is sought to be restored, the petitioner cannot raise any objection. Therefore, there is no merit in this original petition and accordingly, the same is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2 S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== O.P.No. 30182 of 2002- R ================== J U D G M E N T 8th day September, 2009