IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2474 OF 2005 Shivajirao Sakharam Jondhale ...Petitioner Versus Dnyaneshwar Co-op Hsg.Scty.Ltd. & Ors..Respondents ...... Mr.C.R.Sonawane for Petitioner. Mr.F.A.Mulla i/b Mr.S.M.Kamble for Respondents 3 to 9. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. AUGUST 4, 2008. AUGUST 4, 2008. AUGUST 4, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. It is fairly accepted by the Counsel for the Petitioner that the regular Civil Suit No.406 of 2000 has been dismissed by the Trial Court for default. 2. As the main suit is dismissed, nothing survives for consideration in the present Petition which takes exception to the interlocutory order passed therein. Even if the Writ Petition was to : 2 : be entertained, the fact remains that no interim order operated in favour of the Petitioner during the pendency of this Writ Petition. The order of status-quo passed by the Trial Court came to an end on passing of impugned order by the Trial Court itself. 3. Be that as it may, assuming that the Petitioner/Plaintiff will take steps for restoration of the Suit instead of dwelling upon the issues raised in the present Writ Petition, this Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to apply to the Trial Court for early disposal of the Suit if restored. The Trial Court shall then pass appropriate orders in that behalf as may be advised. Ordered accordingly. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.