IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4700 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 23.09.2009 Ramesh Chand and others .....Petitioners versus Tirlok Tirath Vidyavati Chhuttani Charitable Trust and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vishal Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners are aggrieved at the order dated 3.6.2009 whereby the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, has dismissed their application for amendment of the written statement. The aforestated application was moved by the petitioner- tenants, at the stage when the respondent had already closed its evidence. The petitioners wanted to amend the written statement and deny the relationship of landlord and tenant. The Rent Controller has dismissed the application after observing that the same has been moved at a belated stage and in order to wriggle out of the relationship of landlord and tenant. C.R. No.4700 of 2009 (O&M) 2 It is urged by learned counsel for the petitioners that the property is still owned by three private persons and has not been transferred in the name of the respondent-trust on the basis of their will(s). It is evident from the impugned order itself that late Dr. P.N.Chuttani is said to have executed a Will dated 28.5.1993 donating the demised premises in favour of the respondent-trust. The plea taken by the petitioners, therefore, is totally misconceived and a delaying tactics. No interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction, is called for in the impugned order Dismissed. 23-09-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE