IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22901 of 2010 SHAILENDRA PRASAD @ SURENDRA PRASAD S/O RAMCHANDRA MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 07.09.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 406, 420, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the petitioner offered employment for the daughter of the informant and got deposited a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs for the same which turned out to be fake appointment. It has been submitted that it appeared during investigation that in fact the petitioner himself was cheated by the co- accused persons on the pretext of offering a job to his lame son. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa (Nalanda) 2 in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 141/2010, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )