IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2009 / 12TH SRAVANA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 4242 of 2009() ----------------------------- C.R. NO.63 OF 2009 OF KOLLAM EXCISE RANGE PETITIONER/ACCUSED -------------------------------------- SANTHOSH N.,AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.NADARAJA, PERUMPALLIL THEKKETHIL, THEKKEVILA, IRAVIPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.RAJA SRI.M.T.SURESHKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. --------------------------------------------- B.A.No.4242 of 2009 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2009 ORDER This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the sole accused in C.R.No.63 of 2009 of Kollam Excise Range. 2. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under Section 55(i) of the Abkari Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is nothing to the connect the petitioner with the offence. Learned counsel has raised several points on facts in support of this contention. 4. I have gone through the case diary. 5. I do not think that those contentions can be dealt with in an application for anticipatory bail and a finding arrived at. Prima facie, the records would reveal the complicity of the petitioner. I do not think that this is a fit case where anticipatory bail can be granted. Accordingly, the Bail Application is dismissed. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE csl