(1) (26) WP 860/11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Amk WRIT PETITION NO. 860 OF 2011 Kiran Digambara Kalal .. Petitioner Vs. Priya Kiran Kalal (Bangar) & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. Pankaj Kawali i/b M/s. Mayur Narendra & Co. for the Applicant. CORAM : MRS. ROSHAN DALVI, J. Date : 17 th JUNE, 2011. P.C. 1. The Petitioner-husband has challenged the order of the Sessions Judge, Nashik in Criminal Revision Application No. 119 of 2010 concluding that the Petitioner did not show sufficient cause for the delay in filing the Criminal Revision Application. Instead of showing how the impugned order suffers from the manifest error with regard to the condonation of delay of 106 days, the Counsel on behalf of the Petitioner has sought to argue the maintenance application granting maintenance of Rs.5,000/- to his wife under an ex parte order passed by the Magistrate. That is not the purview of the Writ Petition. In this Writ Petition only the error in not condoning the delay of 106 days would have to be seen. The case of condonation of delay that the Advocate was absent and the Petitioner could not contact the Advocate. It has been correctly held that the delay is not sufficiently explained. 2. The Writ Petition is dismissed. (ROSHAN DALVI, J.)