NR 0 ^ •^0 ^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P fS) N0. ^U O ^. /2010 PETITIONERS <^tf.^^ <& <^/y ' • -w' n.y ^.<?y .^(^y ^;' W -•ty\ / '/ < ,y 4^ .°<r' <^/ :1 Rajkumar Pradhan, S/o. Shri Daulat Ram, Caste-Kolta, aged about 44 years, Peon, Govt. Middle Sch.ool Amapali, Development Block - Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.) /I. Dhanad Kumar Patel, S/o. Santram Patel, aged about 40 years, Peon, Government Pre-Middle School Dhiwani, Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Om Prakash Dansena, S/o. Goverdhan Prasad Dansena, aged about 43 years, Peon, R/o, Village-Kotetaramuda, Tahsil- Raigarh, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) ^A. Surit Lal Chouhan, S/o. Shri Shanti Lal Chouhan, aged about 47'years, Peon, R/o. Village Jevridih, Post Badebhandar, Tahsil Pusssaur, DistrictRaigarh (C.G.) ^5. Krishna Kumar Chouhan, S/o. ' Shri Gajadhar Chouhan, aged about 37 years, Peon, R/o. Village Singhanpur, Post Nah'arpali, Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh (C.G.) 6. Shyam Kumar Ogre, S/o.Paharu Ram, aged about-36 years, Peon, R/o. Village- Kunjedabari,PQSt - Kondatarai, Block- Pussaur, District Raigarh (C.G.) (^) RESPONDENTS VERSUS / :1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) (/ 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) / 4. Block Education Officer, Kharsiya, District Raigarh (C.G.) / 5 Block Education Officer, Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.) ^ ^ Block Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Pussaur, District Raigarh (C.G;) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA. + XI-HG—78 3lI^IWft:TW 'TT2ff 3TT^T st>*iiqr> ^. 'S^l '<<I<<KI<<, ®tI1y<i<o,fsiyiyy,< *<i*icti (h*(|cb ••SiC3^ ;...s GD Sf^T 'T^F (ipfgsi^) TCiiwafei sii^i * i.3rtf^W?BiT 'C1 1U?i3 .?iT<£i?lT^~'Rt B^SlTT-TWI ruf i¥I.J'^* UUOi.A^-EiF jr£S.i,1 lAtJS'^uiJ ct>l 20.09.2010 Shri Ramakant Pandey, c< Shri Aiit Sineh- P.L.'for th. Grievance of the aetitiorl though they are entitled &r regL vears of their service but the sanl Counsel for the petitioned representation (Annexure P/3) decided. He subiruts that ends o| are oerraitted to withdraw this detailed.reoresenta.tion. He subj the respondent No.3 for decidinf State counsel has no obie^ reDresenta.tion and the same is tj Accordingly, the petition| petition with the liberty as afore^ such reoresentation bv the oetl from the date of receiot of cod decided by the competent authil months. it is made ciear tnat this on merits of the case and the a'<.| mav decide the 'reoresentation ir| CM<iF<n4lri Mi+i<nt* ^f^^ <^i^i<, ^aifin aii^i tunsel fbr the oetitioners. State. srs in the present petition ;s that |ar pav scale after coapietion of tfaree |e has not been granted to thsm. fc submits that thev have aJready filed liectively but the same has not been iustice would serve if the aetitioners betition with liberty to make a fresh tnits fh.at direction mav be issued to their reoresentation expeaitiousiy. ttion if the petitioners make an^- such •ing decided in accordance with iaw. ;rs are oermitted to withdraw this [aid. in the eventuality of making any Itioner within a penod 01 two weeks V of this order. the same would be )rity within a further oeriod of three Court has not expressed anv ooinion thoritv ccncerned wouid. if so desire, -L^__ accordance with law. Sd/- " pririnker Diwakar Judge