IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2244 of 2009 Saroj Kumari Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 12. 15.09.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the Opposite parties. A supplementary show cause is filed on behalf of Opposite parties 2 & 4. Counsel for the petitioner acknowledges that the order of the Court stands complied in so far as arrears of salary are concerned. He however submits that future salary as also directed by the Court is not being paid from March 2011. He fairly acknowledges that this fact has not been mentioned in the pleading. The Court can only observe at this stage that the Opposite parties are expected to act reasonably and responsibly by not generating wholly unwanted litigation, now a statutory obligation after formulation and publication of the State Litigation Policy, which the Court expects that the Opposite parties themselves shall not violate. If the petitioner represents for any future salary from March 2011 the Court expects the same tobe considered in light of the aforesaid observation. The MJC application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)