HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISCiARH_: BSLASPUR WRIT PETtTION (2271 N0.6450 OF 2008 PETITIONER NON-APPLICANT APPELANT RESPONDENT APPi-ICANT RESPONDENT Etwar Singh, S/o Dokari Sora, aged about 28 yeara, R/o vill. Nawapara 0'ha.), Tah. & Distt. Raigarh(CG). Versus Nehru Lal Chauhan, S/o Dharam Singh Chauhan, aged about 39 years, Caste Gond, R/o Nawapara fTha.), Tah. & Distt. Raigarh (CG). (Writ petition under ArtiGle 227 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench : Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Vipin Punjabi, counsel for the petitioner. ORALORDER (Passed on this 29th day 6f Ssptember, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submite that the review appiication filed by the respondent herein under the provisions of Section 35 (3) of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Cod®was allowed without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and, as such, the petitioner has been prejudiced. 2) On perusal of the impugned order dated 25-1-2008 (Annexure-P/3), it appears that the case has been restored to original file in the review gpplication. The case is still pending consideration before the Board of Revenue. Since no opportunity was given to the petitioner, the petitfoner is entitled to full opportunity to contest the case on merit. Interest of justice would be sub-served, if proper opportunity is granted to the petitioner before the passing the order on merit. 3) For the reasons mentioned bereinabove, the petition stands •'SS. Gowri 4) Consequently, pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge