HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR WRIT PETITION NO. 29559OF 2010 Between: P. bhoopathi ………….Petitioners AND The Commissioner for Cooperation…and others ………….Respondents HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR WRIT PETITION NO. 29559 OF 2010 ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) The petitioner herein was originally joined in service on 23-11-1970 as a Clerk and later he was promoted as Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies on 30-9-2001 and got retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 31-10-2005. It is the case of the petitioner that his name was included in the panel along with his juniors taking into consideration of vacancies as on 1-9-2005 for promotion to the post of Special Cadre Deputy Registrar and that the respondent authorities delayed the filling up of vacancies of Special Cadre Deputy Tahsildars on the basis of the panel approved before his retirement, and the same resulted in denial of his legitimate promotion as Special Grade Deputy Registrar. The petitioner asserted that in the month of September 2005 several vacancies arose but due to administrative correspondence, there was delay in issuing the promotion orders. Since the respondents issued promotion orders subsequent to the date of his retirement, they ought to have considered his case for giving notational promotion for the purpose of giving monetary benefits. The petitioner therefore filed the O.A. claiming notational promotion and all attendant benefits. Even though the name of the petitioner was approved for the panel year 2004-2005, as there was no vacancy available for promoting the petitioner prior to his retirement on 31-10-2005, and that juniors to the petitioner were promoted on 29-11-2005 against the vacancies which occurred after the retirement of the petitioner, the Tribunal rightly declined to entertain the O.A. Apart from that it is also brought to our notice by the learned Government Pleader that the petitioner was not having requisite service in the feeder category. In the circumstances, we do not see any ground to entertain the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is meritless and is dismissed. No costs. _______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J ____________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J DATE: 6-12-.2010 Kk/ HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR WRIT PETITION NO. 29559 OF 2010 6-12-2010