IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20873 of 2010 SANJEET YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 29.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Admittedly, neither the petitioner is named in the FIR nor anything has been recovered from his possession and his name came in this case in the confessional statement of co-accused. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner points out that having similar allegation some co-accused persons have already been granted privilege of bail by another bench of this court. Although learned P.P. refers paragraph 66 of the case diary in which criminal antecedent of the petitioner has been incorporated by the Investigating Officer but S.P, Supaul has reported that petitioner carries only one case in his bag. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner( (Sanjeet Yadav @ Sanjeev Yadav) is directed to be released on bail in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case no. 29 of 2008 registered under section 395 of the IPC on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul subject to the condition that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner and holder of the landed property. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)