upa 1 app126-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2010 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.378 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 1526 OF 2005 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 615 OF 2010 IN APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2010 Smt.Aruna Vimalkumar Garg and another ).. Appellants Versus Dani Sadan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. ) and others ).. Respondents Mr.Sanjay Udeshi i/b Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for the Appellants. Mr. Hamid Kadiani i/b M/s ALMT Legal for Respondent No.1. Mr. P.K. Samdani, Senior Advocate, i/b M/s.Kishore Thakordas & Co. for Respondent No.2. CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. AND DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2010 P. C. : After the pronouncement of the judgment, learned counsel for respondent No.1 prays for stay of operation of this judgment for four weeks in order to have further recourse in accordance with law. upa 2 app126-10 2. Learned counsel for the appellants opposes the prayer. 3. In the facts and circumstances, we see no justification for grant of stay of operation of this judgment. Prayer is, therefore, rejected. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.