IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 24214 of 1999 Between: Kalla Scsheela Rani, D/o. Sri K.Madhusudhan Rao, R/o. RTC No.42 Vidyadharapuram , Vijayawada 520 012. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. Andhra Pradesh State Road, Transport Coporation, Represented by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2. The Deputy Chief Personnel Manager (Rect), Musheerabad, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order direction or writ particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents in not permitting the petitioner to appear for the written test and interview held on 25.10.1999 is illegal and violative of Article 14,16,&21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to conduct the written test for the petitioner and consider her candidature along with the candidates appeared for the written test and interview held on 25.10.99 for the post of Lab. Technician Grade_II in pursuance of the notification No.PD-11/1999 dt.19.4.99 with all consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.G.VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondents : MR.C.PRAKASH REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following : ORDER : It is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner that due to paucity of time, the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 5th March 2009. ajr