1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Review Application No. 46 of 2007 in Second Appeal No. 21 of 2006 (Maulanbee Ghudusab V. Iranna Sangamnath & ano.) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. A.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the applicant Mr. N.K. Tungar, Advocate holding for Mr. U.B. Bilolikar, Advocate for the respondents No. 1 & 2 PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. This review application is filed against the Judgment of my learned brother Justice Shri Bhatiya dated 24th January, 2006, by which it was held that there was no substantial question of Law involved in the appeal and the appeal was dismissed. 3. Mr. Deshmukh, learned Advocate appearing for the applicant contended that after dismissal of the appeal, his client was dispossessed. He said that all along it was the case of the applicant that he was already in possession of the suit property as tenant 2 and thereafter he agreed to purchase the property. He said, though his case of agreement to purchase the property and his suit for specific performance was dismissed, his status as tenant or occupier of the suit property would continue even after the dismissal of his suit. He said, despite of this, his client has been dispossessed due to the passing of the Judgment of this Court. I am afraid, this submission would not be sufficient to review the Judgment of this Court, referred to above. Besides, what happened after the Judgment of this Court, can never have any bearing on the Judgment under review. The review should therefore fail. 4. The review application stands dismissed. In view of dismissal of review application, Civil Application No. 54 of 2007 stands disposed of. 7th June, 10 ( A.V.NIRGUDE, J. ) srm/