HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 965 of 2006 (MS) 1. Smt. Sudha Bisht w/o Sri P.S. Bisht Vishwanath Tent House, Main Market, Uttarkashi 2. Rajendra Singh s/o Sri Fampar Singh, Village Barsali, Patti Barsali, Tehsil Dunda, District Uttarkashi 3. Parmveer Sigh s/o Sri Ajar Singh, Village Barsali, Patti Barsali, Tehsil Dunda, District Uttarkashi 4. Ram Raj Singh s/o Sri Rajendra Singh, Nandgaon, Barkot, District Uttarkashi ……….. Petitioners. Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through secretary Education (Basic) Civil Secretariat, Dehradun. 2. Director, School Education, Govt. of Uttaranchal 3. Additional Director, State Counsel of Education, Research and Training, Uttaranchal, Tehri Garhwal 4. District Basic Education Officer, District Uttarkashi 5. Principal, Zila Siksha Avam Prashikshan Sansthan Barkot, District Uttarkashi. …………. Respondents. Sri H.M. Raturi, Advocate for the petitioners. Standing Counsel for the respondents. Dated: 26.7.2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Sri H.M. Raturi counsel for the petitioners and Standing Counsel for the respondents. The counsel for the petitioners have submitted that the facts of the present case are similar and are squarely covered by the facts of writ petition no. 930 (MS) of 2006, Kendra Singh & others vs. State & others, which has been decided by this Court on 19.7.2006. In view of above, the respondents are directed to consider the claim of the petitioners in accordance with law subject to the restrictions imposed by N.C.T.E. within one month after obtaining the certified copy of this order. Accordingly, writ petition is allowed. No order as to costs. Dated: 26.7.2006 Rajesh Tandon, J. *Dhyani