1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.582 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.134 OF 2005 Akhil Bhartiya General Kamgar Union ...Appellants v/s Maker Chamber No.III Co-op.Society Ltd...Respondents Mr N.M. Ganguli for Appellants. Mr K.P. Anil Kumar for Respondents. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND V.R. KINGAONKAR JJ. DATE : 15TH MARCH 2010. 2 P.C. :- 1] By this appeal, the appellants challenge the order dated 7th February 2005 passed in writ petition No.134 of 2005 by the learned Single Judge of this Court. 2] The relevant facts are that the appellant  Trade Union filed a complaint challenging retrenchment dated 22nd March 1996 of two security guards under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971. That complaint was dismissed by the Labour Court. Against that order, revision was filed before the Industrial Court. That revision was decided by order dated 6th November 2000. The revision was also dismissed. Writ petition No.134 of 2005 was filed challenging these orders. The writ petition is also rejected. It appears from the order that only one contention was raised before the leaned Single Judge viz. the retrenchment compensation paid to the workmen was not as per law. 3 The leaned Single Judge, however, relying on the judgment of this Court has said that even assuming that the amount of retrenchment compensation was short as mistake, it can be rectified at the earliest and the balance retrenchment compensation can be paid and therefore, the learned Single Judge rejected the petition. We find that in the retrenchment notice itself, how the employer has arrived at retrenchment compensation was explained and it was stated that if the workmen find that for any reason, there is a mistake in calculation of the compensation, it should be pointed out. The workmen replied to the notice, but they did not point out that there is any mistake in calculating retrenchment compensation. In our opinion, therefore, no exception can be taken to the order passed by the learned Single Judge. There was only one point urged before the learned Single Judge, while deciding the same he has relied on the settled law. Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Parties to act on the copy of this order 4 duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. (JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH) (JUSTICE V.R. KINGAONKAR)