c^ 7-' S!Ri IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTES6ARM AT BILASPUR ^?-_t^, WRIT PETCTION fS^ NO.........;.;../SeW/^o/ PETITIONER Kamal Kant bewangan, son of latc Suresh Chandra Dewangan, aged about 24 years, R/o. Mahavir ChowK Patan, District burg (C.6.) •SS-sK RESPON&ENTS .t^,v ,0 VERSUS ^' 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary/Chief Engineer, Mahanadi Sodavari Kachhar (Sichai Vibhag) Shankar Nagar, Rdipur (C.6.), ^ ^"'f?y$' ../ ^- Superintendent Engineer, Shivanath .\'¥""''(i^:''^V"''' ^•'[rfS^y Mandle,Sichai Vibhag, Rajendra Park J^^ ^•''^.'s'^y °i/^v" ^•^'y ,fr-' ^y^iss^^ ^^ /- ~ <^ Durg (C.6.), 3.'- Executive Engineer, Sichai Vibhag, Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.), ^ 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchqyat, Patan, District - Durg (C.G.), WRITPETCTION UNDER ARTCCLE 226 OF THE COUNSTITUTCON OF INblA. The petitioner above-named most respectfully submit as under:- 1. P/\RTECULARS OF THE PETETEONERS: As mentroned in the cause title above. 2. PARTECULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS w^ 'S'Sf "41<<IC1<M, '^ftWTS, is«ni<iy,< ^....^f^^..:..^^ 3!I^?t'T3?7 ( yt3«<ltl:') an^t qil ^i* ^IT^i^t ^Hict> N^ \ deepti ^iTwsfTO ai^r SB : Hon'ble Shri IVIanindra Mohan Shrivastava. J 13-05-2011 tlliat Shri R.S.Patel, counsel forthe petit) Shri N.Naha Roy, Panel Lawyerfor| Heard. The petitioner has filed this petitio|i Praftsman who died while in servicel [sompassionate appointment and he has bj phiksha Karmi Grade-111. The petitionei) tppointed as Assistant Grade-111 accordingl Learned State counsel submitted |3e given an opportunity of filing the detailejl t'espondent authority, which may be tvith law. Having considered and without jhe case, in the opinion of this Court,ends) |s given to the petitioner to make a detailejd tiefore the competent respondent authorityj [his order, within six weeks from today, jhe competent respondent authority shall feccordance with law, as early as possibj hionths from the date of receipt of the j-emains, the petitioner may avail the remec|y With the aforesaid observations, thil Certified copy as per rules. •*l<l!<'f<fl-1 'qfERff'? fyfi tf'a^IT ^; sifin i-.i^i loner. |the State. on the ground that he is a ward of He moved an application for '^en given appointment on the ppst of submitted that he is entitled to be |to the policy. for the present, the petitioner may representation before the competent on its own merits, in accordance considered exijiressing aitd any opinion on the merits of of justice will be served, if a direction representation raising his grievance along with a copy of the petition and on such representation being filed, Uecide the same on its own merits in je, preferably within a period of four ipresentation. If any grievance still available underthe law. petition stands disposed off. —5rslnvMM" .tRRftlIR—f'S'140—2/20' 1—I,: