@ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l APPLICATION UDER ORDER 41. RULE 19 CODE OF CIVIL APPLICANTS (DEFENDANTS). PROCEDURE M.C.C. No. 5^1 /2011 1. ghigla Bencti ^--^:. h* :'~\e o^?" ^. .»* ...••••".^'.-••< ^y^^ \^,.-/"J<! T^"" cv Hari Ram S/o Late Gopi Ram Sahu, aged about - 50 years, R/o Jhopadapara, Near Railway Station, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Dumuk Ram S/o Late Gopi Ram Sahu, aged about - 46 years, R/o Village Devtara, Tahsil-Takhatpur, Disfa-ict - Bilaspur (C.G.) Mithilesh Kumar S/o Late Gopi Ram Sahu, aged about - 41 years, R/o Village Devtara, Tahsil-Takhatpur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) Smt. Dukhni Bai W/o Late Gopi Ram. Sahu, aged about - 77 years, R/o Village Devtara, Tahsil-Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5.^ Triveni Bai D/o Late Gopi ^ Ram Sahu, aged about - 56 years, R/o Village Devtara, Tahsil-Takhatpur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 6. Ganga Bai D/o Late Gopi Ram Sahu, aged about - 56 years, R/o Village Devtara, NON-APPLICANT (PLAINTIFFS) ^ ^t' Tahsil-Takhatpur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 7. Bhuvenshwar S/o Late Dulare Rain Sahu, aged about - 16 years, Minor through Mother Smt. Rairta Bai, R/o, Village Darri, Tahsil 85 District - Korba (C.G.) ^- Jagannath S/o Late Dulare Ram Sahu, aged about-10 years, Minor through Mother Sint. Rama Bai, R/o, Village Darri, Tahsil 85 District - Korba (C.G.) Rama Bai W/o Late Dulare Rain Sahu, R/o, Village Darri, Tahsil & District - Korba (C.G.) Versus 1,^ Haralal S/o Kriparam, aged about - 56, years, R/o Village 9. Devtara, Tahsil-Takhatpur, Disti-ict ~ Bilaspur (C.©.) Rohit Kuinar, S/o Kriparain, aged about - 56 years, R/o Village Devtara, Tahsil- Takhatpur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) APPLICATION U/0 41RULE19 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Arising ,out of order dated 06.07.11 passed by the HonTole Courrin S.A.No^252/lL The applicants respectfully beg to subm.it as under:- sv^fi w R-ti* (T8ff <^l^<l 8>1I<;^ •^ '3S[ -tliqK-l^, a-flly'Kfl, [Gldl'yij,'!. _.....f^.^^l/^ wi-see- 3TI^?1 TR^T ('j?^^!) WIRR ^iftg ai^i S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice PrashtintKumar Mishra 06.09.2011. Shri Devesh Kela, Heard leamed counsel ofdelay in filing the M.C.C. On due consideration, I.A. Delay in filing the restoratior) l-1eard learned counsel Tortt<e This is an apirfication for which was dismissed for want of The re^ons assigned for foundto be sufficient. Accordingly, the IVI.C.C. is a| Second Appeal No. 252/201|' ^il^I^i<i1l *^i*icff "£f15%^ Tf^^H ^aifiinan^i counsel fi|>r the applicants. for tt1e applicants on t.A. No.1 for condonation Nb. 1 is allcNved. application is condoned. appticants. reitoration of Second Appeal ^to. 252/201 1 pr<}secution by this Court on 06/07/2011. ijlefault in appearance is considered and lowed. l|1 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge WU'CVl liAfl tlil»lli'>1,<l<4^ii;'IW—FS/140—2/2011^1,50;000.->~