IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 9955 of 2008 Decided on: 14.6.2011 Narain Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anil Jaswal, Deputy Advocate . General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant . Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Petitioner is aggrieved by the issuance of Annexures A-2, dated 23.5.2003 and A-3, dated 10.6.2003. Admittedly, the petitioner has not been heard before the issuance of Annexures A-2 and A-3. The petitioner has suffered civil and evil consequences and was required to be heard before the decision was taken to reduce his salary. 2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is allowed. Annexures A-2 and A-3 are quashed and set aside. However, it shall be open to the respondents to proceed with the matter in accordance with law. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge June 14, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?