WP(C) 44/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Mr. P. Kataki, learned counsel has filed Caveat on behalf of the private respond ent No.6 and the Caveat stands discharged. 2. The petitioner challenges the transfer order dated 21.12.2010, whereby t he Director of Secondary Education, Assam has reverted the petitioner from the p ost of Subject Teacher at Dergaon Indrani Devi H.S. School of Golaghat district to her original place of posting at Betioni H.S. School and the respondent No.6 is brought as Subject Teacher in the school where the petitioner is serving. 3. It is contended that the petitioner was brought on transfer to Dergaon I ndrani Devi H.S. School on 19.11.2005 because of public complaints against the r espondent No.6 and she should have been permitted to continue in this school in view of the earlier order of the Commissioner recorded on 24.8.2006, ordering ac commodation of the petitioner in a vacant post in the said school. 4. Against the transfer order, the petitioner has filed a representation on 31.12.2010 indicating her difficulties and pointing out that vacancies are avai lable in the Teok Girls Higher Secondary School, where the petitioner can be po sted rather than repatriating her to Betioni H.S. School located at a remote pl ace, without proper means of communication, where the petitioner had already ser ved for over 10 years. 5. Mr. P. Kataki, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.6 submits that respondent No.6 has already joined at Dergaon Indrani Devi H.S. School on 29.12.2010. 6. Mr. A. Deka, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Education Depart ment representing the respondents 1 to 5 submits that in the above circumstances , it would be appropriate to permit disposal of the petitioner’s representation dated 31.12.2010 (Annexure-12) by the competent authority, rather than keeping t his matter pending in the High Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. R. Dutta and Mr. P. Kataki appearing for the respondent No.6 has no objection t o disposal of the petitioner’s representation. 7. In view of above, the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of As sam, Education Department is directed to consider and dispose of the representat ion filed by the petitioner on 31.12.2010 against the transfer order dated 21.12 .2010, with a speaking order. For enabling such consideration, the petitioner wo uld furnish a copy of her representation along with a copy of this Court’s order by 11.1.2011 to the said officer. The representation be disposed of within 2 we eks thereafter. Until the representation is disposed of, status quo on the servi ce of the petitioner shall be maintained. 8. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly.