. ^•-.'T. ^l-^.i--L'L-l..'L^.'3'<. ^'L-i ^ ^^oi^ ^mLEia^a IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. . „ . WRIT PETITION(S) N0. '-K? /'&> ,_QF 2008 PETITIONER: ^^ ^^^- t^.V^ .-''* ^i?--"" ^. %<^ '"^'•'^k-.- ^* Q^fr' 'Dr.R.K. Tiwari, S/o- Shri M.P.Tiwari, Aged About- 45 Years, Occupation- Service (Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, Cattle Breeding Farm, Pakariya, Thesil-Pendra; Distt. Bilaspur), R/o- Jyotipura Street Pendra, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS ^' .•c RESPONDENT(S): l.State of Chhattisgarh Through it's Secretary Department ofAgricult.ire (Animal Husbandry), D;K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) /-2. Joint SeGretary Departaient of Agriculture (Animal Husbandry), D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) /3. Director Veterinary Services, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) /' Govind Singh Neti, S/o- (Not known to the petitioner) Aged About-50 Years, Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, Office- Chhal Virujalya, Pendra, Distt. BUaspur (C.G.) S.fcfe'ai^-"S'A6sila!'a!:''*?<S'i'-i-'".t'A'!n.JU»^Bg;'; S^SS^BS^s^SS-^SSS^S^SiSsSSsa WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFT CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGH AT BILASPUR (Hon.Mr.JustJcePritinkerDiwaker) WritPetition (S) No. 4676 of 2008 PETITIONER Dr. R.K. Tiwrari. VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others. Shri Vinay Pandey counsel for the petitioner. Ku. Sunita Jain PL for the respondents/State. WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (09.07.2009) With the consent of the counsel for the ^arties, the matter is heard finaliy. Chalienge in the instant petition is to the order dated 29.7.2008 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.2 whereby the petitioner was relieved to join at Veterinary Hospital, Devbhog, District Raipur. This petition was filed on 22.8.2008 andthestaywas granted in favour ofthe petitioner vide order dated 27.8.2008. Contention ofthecounselforthepartiesis that this Court may quash the impugned transfer order by giving liberty to the respondents to pass fresh order if administrative exigency so warrants. In view of the submissions of the counsel for the respective parties and looking to the fact that the petition was filed on 22.8.2008 and stay was granted in favour of the petitioner vide orderdated 27.8.2008, the Anpugned order dated 29.7.2008 so far as it relates to the petitioner is hereby quashed. However, the respondents shall be free to pass the order afresh if administrative exigency necessitates the same. With the aforesaid observation, the petitionstands disposed of. Sd/-:.::;:.1':' pritinkerDiwakar Judge - r?^ "^~=S3^£S^EaEK3(£i<CAi'2h^s^&;^ ^^Si^iiSj^'