IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3206 of 2011 RAMJI MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 11.05.2011 The order of summoning the petitioner has been questioned in the present petition by which the petitioner has been directed by the trial Court under section 319 Cr.P.C. to stand trial in Sessions Trial No. 202 of 2006. The evidence showing complicity of the petitioner was produced before me and it appears that the petitioner dealt a fasuli blow on the informant. The language of Section 319 Cr.P.C. indicates that if any person, not on trial, appears to have committed an offence then he has to be summoned to stand trial. I have just noted above that the witnesses have assigned specific role against the petitioner to have assaulted the informant. In view of that the summoning of the present petitioner appears within the four corners of law. The petition is dismissed. Amit ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )