IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 107 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 107 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 107 OF 2005 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2641 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2641 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2641 OF 2005 LALCHAND HIRALAL GUPTA & ORS. .....PETITIONERS. VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS ......RESPONDENTS. None for the Petitioner. Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP - for Respondent No. 1 & 2. Mr. Uttangale for Respondent No.3. Santosh Shetye i/b. D.S. Sakhalkar for Respondent No. 4. Mr. A.S. Anand for Respondent No. 7. CORAM : S.K.SHAH, J. CORAM : S.K.SHAH, J. CORAM : S.K.SHAH, J. DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2006 DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2006 DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2006 P.C. 1. None for the petitioner. 2. Contempt alleged is of the order passed by the Division Bench on 14th February, 2005. The Petitioners were granted protection to their hutments untill decision of the High Power Committee is arrived at. The affidavit in reply has been filed on behalf of the Contemnors stating therein that there is no demolition of the hutments of the Petitioner and construction of the third building has also not been started. Moreover, they have produced the decision of the High Power Committee taken in December, 2005. 3. Under the circumstances, nothing remains in this Contempt Petition. 4. The Contempt Petition, therefore, stands dismissed. [S.K. SHAH,J.]