4. wp 3591-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 3591 OF 2010 Dattatray Baliram Ukirade .. Petitioner Vs Director General of Police, Maharashtra State & Ors .. Respondents Mr. V.A. Madane for the Petitioner Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the State CORAM : P.V. HARDAS & M.N. GILANI, JJ. DATE : 25th MARCH, 2011. PER COURT: 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioner prays for issuance of a writ directing respondent nos. 1 to 4 to take action against the accused named in the Complaint of the petitioner dated 9th March 2010. The petitioner further prays vide prayer clause (b) to direct respondent nos. 1 to 4 to conduct an enquiry against the persons named in the Complaint dated 9th March 2010 and to register an offence against the accused. 2. The learned APP states on instructions that pursuant to the Complaint of the petitioner, an offence vide Crime No. 24 of 1 4. wp 3591-10.doc 2010 came to be registered and after completing the investigation, a charge sheet in respect of the offence punishable under Sections 143, 147, 149, 323 and 504 of the IPC and under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Akkalkot. The charge sheet has been registered as Regular Criminal Case No. 144 of 2010. 3. It further appears that pursuant to the Complaint of the petitioner in respect of the police officer, an enquriy came to be conducted and accordingly, the petitioner has been informed by the communication dated 8th September 2010 that no action can be taken on the basis of the Complaint of the petitioner as no irregularity or misconduct is disclosed. The aforesaid communication is not a subject matter of challenge in the present petition. 4. In the light of what has been stated by us above, according to us, the reliefs which the petitioners have prayed for in this petition stand fully granted to him and accordingly, we dismiss the petition with no order as to costs. [ M.N. GILANI, J ] [ P.V. HARDAS, J ] 2 4. wp 3591-10.doc 3