IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17830 of 2009 1. MANISH PASWAN S/O SRI CHANDESHWAR PASWAN R/O VILL.- DADHPI, P.O.- BANDECHA, P.S.- GOH, DISTT.- AURANGABAD Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AURANGABAD 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION AURANGABAD 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER RAFIGANJ, AURANGABAD 5. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER RAFIGANJ, AURANGABAD 6. PRAMUKH, RAFIGANJ P.S. AND BLOCK- RAFIGANJ, DISTT.- AURANGABAD ----------- 02/ 16.04.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner’s case is that his name was in the panel of untrained Urdu candidate in Scheduled Caste category for appointment of Prakhand teacher in Rafiganj Block, but he was not called for counselling and as a consequence not appointed on the post of Prakhand teacher. Petitioner has filed his appeal in this regard, but the same has not been disposed of. Considering this fact, this writ application is being disposed of directing the District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Aurangabad to dispose of the pending appeal of the petitioner, in accordance with law within the statutory period. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)