^ <-" Gi£El^ff'. '.x.aaSsgu, S^SvS^^^y '2»S^^J?U C^) '~s~o IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.1 WRIT PETITION fS) N0. S- &.^ OF 200^ 7 PETITIONER ^ \<>:'^vx".- .^•"'-s?-^..-''" }^i^"'" <>•' .•''-,-?.*••"'^^•'" ^y... •°" tt..-"' ^&/jt>-7 Ramlal Sahu Son of Shri Baniyaram Sahu, aged about 40 years, Presently posted at Govt. Primary School Udela, Block Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS "•i'*s* ^- ^l ^f^.^:^ <$?^y' State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The District Education Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.). 3. The Block Education Officer, Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIQRARI. MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS; f-y HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISeARH AT BILASPW SIN6LEBENCH : HON-BLE MR SATISH K A6NIHOTRI J. Petitioner WRFT PETmON (s) N0 507 OF 2007 Premtal Chauhan [ versus Re^iondents : State of Chhattisgarfi cndothers WRIT PETTnON (s) N0 510 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus Dilchcnd Chauhan State of Chhatt-isgarh and others WRFT pETrriON ts) NO. si9 OF 2007 Petitioner Surendrd Kumar Bishal versys Resoondents : Stuteof Chhatt'isgarh andothers WRTT PETmON fal N0. 521 OF 2007^ Petitioner Rea>ondents versys Ramlal Sahu State of Chharttisgarh and others WRTT PETmON ts) N0. 522 OF 2007 Petitioner Resoondents versys Topsingh Patel State of Chhattisgarh and others Ari wftrr pETmoN faiNO 523 OF 2007 Petitioner r 1 Resoondents yersus Bhonupratop Sidar State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. P.P. 5ahu, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Sati^i 6uptn, &y. 6ovt. Advocate for the Stats/ respondents. / ORbER (Passed on this 25tt day of Jniuary, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as wetl as for the State/reqiondents jointly submit -that -the facts and question of law invotved in the present writpetitions aresquarefy covered by the decision of this Court in the case of YashwcHvt Kwnev Bhfowdwaj v«. ^bmieipal Corfwratiai, Dwy wid amthw^. 2. For the aforementioned reasons,these writ petitions ore disposed s)f in tepms of the decision of •this Court in •the matter of yashwant Kumar Bharvdwaj^Su'piv^, subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.T.I. Certificates at theic own expenses ofi per the circutars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. A copy of this order be placed on record in connected writ petitions. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge 1 20060DMPJR-C696