IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1209 of 2010 INDRAMANI RAI, S/o. Devaki Rai, r/o. Village- Garib Patti, P.S. Sonepur, District- Saran. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 08.03.2010 Heard. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Sonepur P.S. Case No. 116 of 2009 under Sections 341,386,326 & 307/34 of the I.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a compromise petition was filed in this case and some other accused persons were allowed anticipatory bail on the basis of compromise petition. He also submits that any injury report is not available in the case-diary. Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, learned Addl.P.P. submits that there is direct allegation on the petitioner that he had fired the shot hitting the right Panjra of the informant and this makes out a case of Section 307 I.P.C. and the compromise petition does not make any difference. It is also submitted that the informant was treated at P.M.C.H. at a far off place from the P.O. and time will be taken in obtaining 2 injury report from P.M.C.H. and that it will be obtained in course of the investigation. Thus hearing and considering the allegation on the petitioner, I do not find it a fit case for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. Mkr. (C.M. Prasad, J.)