IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 5th day of December, 2011 1st Bail Application No.1106 of 2011 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Sanjay S/o Sukkha R/o Village-Rehmatpur, P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar. ………Applicant Versus tate of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party S Arising out of Case Crime No. 263 of 2011, Under Section 394, 411, 20B of I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Roorkee District-Haridwar. 1 Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. S.K.Shandilya, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder, present for the State. Heard. Applicant Sanjay S/o Sukkha, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 263 of 2011, relating to offences punishable under Section 394, 411, 120B of I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that a joint recovery has been shown of the looted items from the five accused. Co-accused Jogendra, Pramod and Sanjay (Son of 2 Suraj Mal) have already been directed to be released on bail. It is further pleaded that the applicant has no criminal history. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this court is of the view that applicant deserves bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Sanjay S/o Sukkha, be released on bail, on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 05.12.2011 JM