IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.5724 of 2005 Date of decision: February 18, 2008. Manjeet Kaur ...Petitioner(s) v. State of Punjab & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest. Present: Shri Manish Kumar Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.C. Berry, Sr. Dy. Advocate General, Punjab for the respondents. Shri Arihant Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.8. ORDER Surya Kant, J. - In this Civil Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks quashing of the impugned order (Annexure P-9) whereby respondent No.8 has been selected and appointed as Anganwari Worker. She also seeks a direction to respondent No.4 for allotment of work of Anganwari Worker to her. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that both the above stated reliefs sought by her are squarely covered in her favour by a Division Bench judgment of this Court dated 6.11.2007 (Annexure A-1), (Kuldeep Kaur v. State of Punjab & Ors.). Learned Counsel for the Petitioner also relies upon yet another DB judgment dated 22.3.2007 passed by this Court in CWP No.7413 of 2005 (Jasvir Kaur v. State of Punjab & Ors.). After hearing Learned Counsel for the parties and without expressing any views on merits of the petitioner's claims noticed above, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the official respondents to treat this writ petition as a representation and dispose of the same in the light of the two judgments, referred to above, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Needless to say that no action prejudicial to the interest of respondent No.8 and/or other candidates shall be taken without observing the principles of natural justice. Disposed of. February18, 2008. [ Surya Kant ] kadyan Judge