CR 398/1998 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. K.SHARMA Heard Mr. I. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R. Chokraborty, learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate. By means of this writ petition, a prayer has been to appoint the petitio ner as VLEW under the respondents. The claim made is on account of the purported successful completion of the training. From the materials on record, it is not discernible as to whether the petitioner was selected for appointment as VLEW or he was selected for undergoing such training. If the selection was made for und ergoing training, same by itself will not entitle the petitioner to get appointm ent as VLEW. In absence any counter affidavit filed by the respondents, it is no t discernible as to whether the petitioner was selected for VLEW or was selected to undergo for such training. Long 15 years have passed since the petitioner underwent such training. At the time of filing of the writ petition, he was 26 years of age. On that basi s he will be now 41 years of age crossing the age limit for appointment. Considering the matter in its entirety, the writ petition is disposed o f providing that it will be open for the petitioner to make appropriate represen tation to the Commissioner to the Govt. of Assam in the Agricultural Department agitating his grievance. In the event of such representation, the said authority may decide the issue in accordance with law.