Civil Revision No. 5730 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 5730 of 2010 Date of Decision: 8.9.2010 Uma Rani and Others …Petitioners Versus Mohan Lal …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Arun Palli, Senior Advocate with Mr. Divyanshu Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the ground that the petitioner has ceased to occupy the demised shop, cannot be sustained in the eyes of law, as the same was closed for a period of four months after the death of husband of petitioner No.1 Uma Rani. However, on the observation made by this Court that the finding returned by both the Courts below that the demised shop is required for personal necessity, is justifiable. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he will not press the present revision petition in case sufficient time is granted to the petitioners to make an alternative arrangement, as they are running a grocery shop and huge stock and inventory are to be put for clearance. Civil Revision No. 5730 of 2010 2 I find merit in the alternative submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners. As prayed, the present revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, a period of eight months, commencing from 1.10.2010, is granted to the petitioners/tenants to make an alternative arrangement subject to their furnishing an undertaking to the Court of Rent Controller, Nabha, that they shall hand over actual physical vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent/landlord. The undertaking will also state that the rent due for following months shall be paid on or before 7th of each month. The entire arrears of rent, if any, shall be deposited in the Court of Rent Controller, Nabha. The undertaking and the arrears be deposited in the Court of Rent Controller, Nabha,on or before 1.10.2010. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge September 8, 2010 “DK”