IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32891 of 2010 DIPO MUKHIYA, S/o Jogi Mukhiya. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 01.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 472/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 151 of Railway Act. Considering that the petitioner has remained in custody since 22.06.2010 and has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Saharsa Rail P.S. Case No. 13 of 2010 (G.R. No. 76 of 2010) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be local since the petitioner belongs to Saharsa and the other bailor shall be the father/brother of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall 2 also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The Trial Court is well advised to conclude trial positively within a period of one year in view of the nature of offence. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)