IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Arbitration Case No. 122 of 2010 Date of decision: 14th July, 2011 M/s S.P.Singla, Constructions (P) Ltd. 47 Sector-9, Panchkula (Haryana). .......Petitioner Versus The Chief Engineer (The Employoer) Haryana PWD B&R Br. Sector 19-B, Chandigarh. ........Respondent BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram, Senior Advocate with Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate and Mr. Animesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pardeep Singh Punia, Addl. A.G.Haryana for the State of Haryana. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?Yes/No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No Hemant Gupta, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the parties agree that the question raised in the present petition are the questions raised in Arbitration Case No. 77 of 2010. For the reasons recorded therein, the present petition is dismissed. [HEMANT GUPTA] JUDGE 14th July, 2011 Shivani Kaushik