IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5535 of 2010 01. YOGENDRA MAHTO 02. Sunil Mahto ….. petitioners Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 22.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioners in a Police case under Sections 302, 323 and 120B of the Penal Code is that the death of the son of the informant took place on 16.9.2009, the informant lodged U.D. Case on 17.9.2009 making out a completely different course of events when the petitioners were not named and belatedly on 1.10.2009 made out an entirely new occurrence, falsely implicating the petitioners. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Motihari East Champaran in connection with Govindganj P.S. Case No. 123 of 2009. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)