IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 3023 of 2001 Between: V.Thurupal, s/o. Narasaiah, R/o. Kovur, Nellore District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Tribunal, Rep. by his Chairman, Vijayawada. 2 Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Kavali, Nellore District. 3 The Kovur Co-operative Consumers Stores Limited, Rep. by its person in-charge, Kovur, Nellore District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue any apporpriate writ, order, or direction, more preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned order made in O.A.No.234 of 98 on the ﬁle of the 1st respondent Tribunal dt. 20.11.2000 followed by the ﬁnal notice in Rc.No.527/97C dt. 5.1.2001 on the ﬁle of the 2nd respondent as illegal, in contravention of the statue, viod, arbitrary without jurisdiction and unsustainable and set aside the same and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.SRINIVASA VARADA CHARY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 3023 OF 2001 ORDER: Since none appeared for the petitioners on 13.11.2008, the writ petition was directed to be posted “for dismissal”. Today though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither is the counsel for the petitioner present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as costs. _____________ 14-11-2008 asp