IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41710 of 2010 Vivek Yadav, S/o Umesh Yadav, R/o Village- AFjalpur, P.S. - Salkhua, District-Saharsa. …. Petitioner. Versus State Of Bihar ……... Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 22.12.2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. Petitioner is an accused for offence punishable under sections 323, 379, 384, 427, 504, 506 and 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Petitioner is one of the named accused and the allegation is of snatching of mobile and demand of Rangadari etc. on the basis of which charge sheet has been submitted. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although specific allegations have been made against some accused persons, but no specific overt act has been alleged against the petitioner except that he was a member of the mob. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that he has been falsely implicated in this case, although he has got no criminal antecedent and another similarly situated accused namely Ram Bharosh Yadav has been enlarged on bail on the orders of this Court. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner named above is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Salkhua P.S. Case No. 132 of 2010. Sujit (S.N.Hussain, J.)