IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17502 of 2010 1. SMT. LALMUNI KUMARI W/O SHRI UPENDRA KUMAR RAI R/O VILL.- CHAKDERA, P.O.- CHHITRAULI, P.S.- MAHUA, DISTT.- VAISHALI ______ Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR 3. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, MAHUA 4. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYT RAJ, RAMPUR CHANDRABHAN ALIAS DAGRU, P.S.- MAHUA, DISTT.- VAISHALI 5. THE PANCHAYAT SACHIVA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ RAMPUR CHANDRABHAN ALIAS DAGRU P.S.- MAHUA, DISTT.- VAISHALI 6. THE HEADMASTER, ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, CHAK DARA, ANCHAL- MAHUA, DISTT.- VAISHALI _______ Respondents ----------- 02. 17.5.2011 From the material brought on record both by the petitioner and now the stand taken by the State, the Court has no hesitation in coming to the conclusion that the petitioner had derived benefit by certain conduct, which may fall within the realm of breach of law including the Indian Penal Code, but in the totality of circumstance that the petitioner happens to be a young lady and her whole life is ahead on her, may be some of the indiscretion committed by her may not be attributed to her but may be at the instigation of other family members, it will be better that the things are allowed to rest at that. No relief, no mercy can be shown by the Court in the manner in which the appointment was obtained on the set of documents 2 which are not entirely legal and authentic. Writ is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)