IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2911 of 2011 NAND KISHORE MEHTA @ GURUJI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 18.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report and it appears that after five to six months of the alleged occurrence, the name of this petitioner appeared in this case in the statements of witnesses. Moreover, no specific overt-act has been attributed against the petitioner in the statements of above stated witnesses. It appears that the learned Sessions Judge rejected the bail prayer of the petitioner on the ground that the case had been registered in the year 2004 whereas the petitioner could be arrested in the year 2010 but there is nothing in the impugned order to show this fact as to whether the Investigating Officer had taken any process to arrest the petitioner or not. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 42 of 2004. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)