IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29499 of 2008 ----- CHETAN HANDA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.7.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No.36/08 for the alleged offences registered under sections 467, 468, 471, 472, 419, 420, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the Director of Glaze Trading India Private Limited entered into a franchise agreement, as contained in Annexure 2, with one M/s S.K. Traders on 1st of March, 2008 and the present F.I.R. was registered on 8th of March, 2008 primarily alleging to the effect that although the petitioner is the Director of M/s. Glaze Trading India Private Limited, even then he is doing business with M/S S.K. Traders but not giving commission as per the agreement and as such committed the alleged offence. It is submitted that although the said agreement was entered into on 1st of March, 2008 and the 2 F.I.R. was lodged on 8th of March, 2008, but the fact that the commission was not paid is absolutely not understandable. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, and on perusal of the allegation made in the First Information Report as well as the materials brought on the record, it is directed that petitioner Chetan Handa, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No.36/08, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Biharsharif (Rajgir), in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)