IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 769 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 99 OF 2004 SHRI EVENCAO FERNANDES(SIN.DEC.) ....Applicants THROUGH L.RS., Versus SMT. DEVINA FERNANDES AND ORS., ....Respondents Ms. Shreya S. Naik, Advocate for the applicants. Ms. Shreya S. Naik, Advocate for the respondents No.9.1(e), 1(g), 1(h), 1(i), and 1(j). Coram:- R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. Date:- 24th February, 2006 P.C. The learned Advocate for the applicant states that she has already filed Wakalatnama on behalf of the respondents No.9.1(e), 1(g), 1(h), 1(i), and 1(j)and, therefore, prays for transposition of the said respondents as appellants and that they have no adverse interest against the appellants. She states that they could not be joined as appellants at the time of filing of the appeal as their Wakalatnama was not available. The records disclose filing of such Wakalatnama on behalf of the said respondents. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Necessary amendment to the cause title to be carried out within 15 days. Application accordingly stands disposed of. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J. ssm.