';s^f^^35^ ''^Sf^WXi i •<%,. ^^"~,rif ^ ^v HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Gowri PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRFT PETrTOIN (S) No. 1976 of2009 Shailendra Khaiidelwal S/o Shri S.S.Khandelwal, Aged about 42 years, R/o 7/9, Nehm Nagar (East) Bhilai Distt. Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secietary, Higher Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Kushabhau Thakre Patrakarita Avani Jansanchar Vishwavidyalaya Througli its Registrar, Kota Stadium, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Vice Chancellor, Kushabha Thakre Patrakarita Avam Jansanchar Vishwavidyalaya, Kota Stadium, Raipui- (C.G.) WRTT PETITOIN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjTION OF BsfDIA. (SB: Hon'ble Shri Pritinker Diwaker, J.) Present: Shri P.R.Patankar, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri Vivek Sharma, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri Manindi-a Shrivastava, Senior Advocate with Shi-i Rajiv Shrivastava and Shri Ashish Slirivastava, Advocate for the respondent No. 2 and 3. ORDER ( Passed on this 14al Day ofMay, 2009 ) 1. At the very outset, leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that hedoesnotwanttopressfhereliefclauses 10.1,10.2and 10.4 ofthis petitioii at this stage. However, he subimts that ftie respondent No. 3 may be directed to decide the pending representation (Annexure P/11) ofthe petitioner atthe earliest. 2. Leamed couiisel appearing for the respondent No. 2 and 3 submits tliat the representation ofthe petitioner would be decided strictly in accordance with law, and on its own merits. 3. In view ofthe above, wifhout expressing any opinion on merits oftiie case, the respondent-authorities are directed to decide the pending representation oftlie petitioner wifhin a period offour weeks from today. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. CB». Sd/- pritinker Diwakar Judge