IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 19TH OCTOBER 2010 / 27TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 31835 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. ABINSON PAUL.N., S/O.PAULOSE N.S., 7THE SEMESTER STUDENT, B.TECH AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING, SCMS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, KARIKUTTY, ERNAKULAM-683 582. 2. JOSEPH THOMAS, S/O.LATE I.J.THOMAS 7TH SEMESTER STUDENT, B.TECH AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING, SCMS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, KARIKUTTY, ERNAKULAM-683 582. 3. ASHWIN SURESH, S/O.SURESHAN KOTTAYI, 7TH SEMESTER STUDENT, B.TECH AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING, SCMS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, KARIKUTTY, ERNAKULAM-683 582. 4. KARUN V.GOPAL, S/O.T.VENUGOPAL, 7TH SEMESTER STUDENT, B.TECH AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING, SCMS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, KARIKUTTY, ERNAKULAM-683 582. 5. ALI AKBAR RAJ, 7TH SEMESTER STUDENT B.TECH AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING, SCMS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, KARIKUTTY, ERNAKULAM-683 582. 6. BINU NAIR, 7TH SEMESTER STUDENT, B.TECH AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING SCMS SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, KARIKUTTY, ERNAKULAM-683 582. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE SMT.ACHU SUBHA ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS(S): --------------- 1. MAHATMA GADHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GADHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA. SC SRI. T.A. SHAJI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.31835 OF 2010(D) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners are 7th semester students for B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 6th Semester examination was declared, they had failed in one subject Materiology and Instrumentation. The 9th petitioner has also failed in the subject Computer Aided Design and Manufacture. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :