IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.H.S. ANSARI WRIT PETITION NO : 9383 of 1995 Between: 1 S. Nageshwara Chary, s/o S. Krishnamurthy, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University College of Fine Arts, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 2 A.R. Kamal Roy, S/o Ramesh Chandra Kamal, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University College of Fine Arts, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Registrar Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 2 The Principal Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Masab Tank, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, directing the respondents to continue the services of the petitioners in Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, College of Fine Arts, Masab Tank, Hyderabad by declaring the impugned order proceedings No. C/738/95-96 dt:29.4.95 as illegal Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.B.SAI RAM GOUD Counsel for the Respondents : MR C. KODANDA RAM The Court made the following : ORDER: Petitioners 2 in number had questioned the order of their termination and sought for directions to the respondents to continue them in service till regularization of their services. It appears that by an order dated 2-5-1995 in WPMP No. 11689 of 1995 there was a direction to continue the petitioners in service. It is represented by learned Counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners that for regularization of their services, petitioners filed a writ petition, being WP No. 5019 of 1995, which was allowed by order dated 13.3.2003, and aggrieved thereby the respondent University preferred a writ appeal, being W.A.No. 627 of 2003. The same is pending adjudication and has not yet been disposed of. However, there are no orders to continue the petitioners in service.s In such view of the matter, more particularly, the interim orders passed by this Court referred to supra dated 2-5-1995, the instant writ petition is rendered infructuous as petitioners have been taken in service and also the writ petition filed by them for regularization of their services appears to have been allowed. The question as to whether petitioners are entitled to regularization is therefore subject matter of a different proceedings in W.A.No 627 of 2003. Accordingly, instant writ petition is dismissed as infructuous for the reason that petitioners have got the relief claimed by them. Accordingly, no further orders are necessary and the writ petition is closed with the above observations. _____________ 03rd March 2005 Kvrk To 1 The Registrar Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 2 The Principal Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 3. Two CD copies. THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.H.S. ANSARI WRIT PETITION NO : 9383 of 1995 3rd March 2005