IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO : 2126 of 2009 ( Petition under Section of under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the the Order made in Memo in IA.No.503 of 2008 in OS.No.133 of 2008 on the file of the VII Additional District Judge( FTC) at Vijayawada.) Between: Aluru Naga Lakshmi W/o. Srinivas Rao ..... Petitioner AND 1 Pinnamaneni Seetharama Prasad S/o. Late Satyanarayana D.No. 3-1, House of Shaik Allanabai Goshala Centre Penumalur Mandal Krishna District 2 Palakurthi Veera Venkata Haranath Babu S/o. Late Satyanarayana 3 Sri Prasannanjaneya Swamy Devasthanam Trust Rep. by its Secretary Sri V.Bhupal Raju 4 K.C.P.Sugars Factory Ltd., Rep. by its Plant Manager, Vuyyuru, Krishna District 5 LIC of India Divisional Ofice, Machilipatnam, Krishna District Rep. by its Senior Divisional Manager, Machilipatnam 6 G.Ranga Rao S/o. Late Nagaiah 7. K.Venkateswara Rao S/o. Chenchaiah ( no notice is required to Respondent Nos. 2 to 7) .....Respondents The petition coming on for orders as to admission upon perusing the petition and Grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyulu , Advocate for the Petitioner THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING : ORDER Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly, when the respondent was persistently not cooperating in execution of the warrant and where an application is pending before the Court for execution of the warrant, it is apparent that the order passed by the Court below in adjourning the matter to the month of July, 2009 is highly inexplicable and it would indirectly help the respondent in virtually hampering execution of the warrant, which is obviously intended by the respondent and would defeat the very purpose of making application by the petitioner seeking police protection to execute the warrant. Hence, post the matter in the Second Vacation Court. In the meanwhile, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to take out notice on the respondent by registered post acknowledgment due and file proof of service. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1. The VII Additional District Judge( FTC) at Vijayawada, Krihna District. 2. The VII Additional District Judge( FTC) at Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3. One CC to Sri V.s.R.Anjaneyulu, Advocate (OPUC) 4. One spare copy. RV HIGH COURT DSRVJ Dated 1.5.2009 Note: Post the matter in the Second Vacation Court. ORDER CRP.No.2136 of 2009 Direction HIGH COURT RV Dated 5.5.2009s DSRVJ Dated 1.5.2009 Note: Post the matter in the Second Vacation Court. ORDER CRP.No.2136 of 2009 Direction