H§GH CQURT OF ¢H%-}ATTRSGARH: BILA$PUR Wfii ?etition ($3 No. i623 of 2093 Petitioners 1) Jaisai Lakada, Slo. Sonsai‘ aged aboui 48 yams; Assistant Teacher} Government Primary Schad, Kamnga Pama, Blosk Pathwgacn, District Jashpur (CG). 2) Sames’nwar Ram Chakreshi S/o. Kasturam; aged abau‘: 48 years, Assistant Teacher, Gcvt Primary Schcoi. Raogoara (Dakada): Biiock KamabeL Disirict Jashpur (CG). 3) Diiip Singh Ekka, S/o. Hagruram, aged about 50 years; Assistant Teacher; Govt Gms Primary School, Khaspara, Bbck-Pathaigaon, Dismct Kashpur (CG) 4) Bhagw ‘tram Manik, S/o. Guianram, aged about 46 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Dokada, Brock Kansabei, Disrrici Jashpur (CG). Versus Respondenrs 1) State of Chhaitisgam, through Secretary. Schooi Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan. Raipur (CG). 2) Assistanr Commiseioner. Triba§ & Warfare Department, District Jashpur (CG). 3) Block Education Officer, Pathaigaon. District Jashpur (CG). 4) Biock Education Otncer. Kansabei. Dietrtct Jashpur (CG). (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) $3: Hon’bie Mr. Satis'n K. Agnihotri, J. Weeent: Shri VK. Tekam, counsel for the petitioners. Shri AS. Kachhawaha, Deputy Advocate General for the State. GRm. CREER (Passed en 18‘“ Febmary. 299$) The petitioners were initiatiy appointed on 8-8-1§8D as Assistant Teachers on a fixed pay‘scale of Rs. 150/- on probation for a period of two years. Alter completion of probation, the petitioners were granted reguiar pay scale of ’ Rs.’l59-3CG/- on 17-7-‘1 982. I 2) The question of iaw involved herein asto whether the petitioners are ent‘xtied to regu‘ar pay scale with effect from the date of initia1 appointment or from the date of cempletion of probaiion period. 3} Learned counse? appering . for t‘ne petitioners as weil as for ihe Siateirespondents jointw submit "that the facts and question of iaw involved in the peiiiion are the same to that of Writ Petition (S) No.5§76 of 2096 (Sushii ‘i’iwari a others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others), whtoh was allowed vicie order dated 7—11-2006. Learned counsel further submit that this petition may be disposed of in the same terms. 4) in view of the above—stated submission made by iearned counsel appearing for the parties; the writ petition is aliowed in the same terms i.e._, the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scaie with effect from the initiai date of appointment, subject to verification otthetacts. ‘i ' l 3w- I Raju satishK. Agniimm udge m \ I