1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2739 OF 2009 Chandrashekhar @ Chandrakant S/o Jaysing Athare Versus State of Maharashtra *** Mr. R. N. Dhorde, Advocate i/b Mr. N. K. Choudhari, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 10th SEPTEMBER, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel for the accused/ applicant. The accused/ applicant is Chilling Plant In-charge in the society. Learned counsel informs, it was basically on a temporary basis, renewed after every six months. The accused/ applicant being technical person, has no role in the matter of unauthorised selling milk or not maintaining the record of the sale of the milk or transportation of tanker filled with milk and to show exorbitant entries thereof. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 2. Learned A.P.P. points, the Auditor has recorded that the milk sold in the year April 2006 was shown having sold in March, 2006 and the milk stock of March, 2006 was reduced. This was done by the accused/ applicant whereby the storage of milk to the extent of 178916 is reduced. The matter was seriously taken by the Dairy Manager Popot, the General Manager Pralhad, who informed the irregularity/ illegality to the accused/ applicant. The accused/ applicant again did not make entries for the collection of milk for the period 16th March, 2006 to 31st March, 2006, which he made on 22nd May, 2006. At this stage, no interim protection. Application rejected. Earlier interim protection vacated. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:10/09/2009. ans/2739