1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6582 OF 2009 Maruti Dnyanu Kadam ........ Petitioner versus Dnyanu Bala Kadam & ors........Respondent. Mr. Vijay Killedar adv. for the Petitioner None for the Respondent. CORAM: A. P DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 10th November, 2009. P. C.: 1. The petitioner is original plaintiff whose suit came to be dismissed by the trial court and hence he preferred an appeal before the District Court. In the appellate court the Plaintiff/appellant moved an application purportedly under Order 41 Rule 27 of CPC with a view to produce revenue records of the year 1965 which relates to consolidation proceedings and the revenue record for the year 1991 and 2000. The appeal was filed in June 2006. The first appellate court rejected the application as it was of the view that had the petitioner been diligent, the revenue records of the above year could have been procured and filed on record of the trial court. As the case of the petitioner did not fall within the parameters of Order 41 Rule 27 of CPC the application came to be rejected. 2 2. Perused the order. The same does not suffer from any illegality or impropriety warranting any interference in writ jurisdiction. In the result petition is dismissed. (A. P. Deshpande, J.)