^^ ,,-"" IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Review Petition N0. ^ /2011 PETITIONER RBSPONDENTS ^/ -g^ . ^y/^ <%-^' ^',.^A/ <y Director, Regional Leprosy Training & Research Institute, Lalpur, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan,Raipur (C.G.), Uchha Stariya Chhanbin Samiti (in the matter of Scmtiny of SC/ ST Caste Certificate), Through : its Secretary, Ravi Shankar Vishwavidyalaya Parisar, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Adim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas, Ravi Shankar Vishwavidyalaya Parisar, Raipur (C.G.), Mrs. Reena Masih, W/o. Ishwari Masih, aged about 42 years, Occupation Ser^ice, Presently working as Staff Nurse in the Regional Leprosy Training and Research Institute (Controlled by Govt. of India), Lalpur, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.), APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF THE ORDER DATED 04-02- 2011, PASSED IN W.P.NO. 4881/2005 ^-^" HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR l^ 18 ii- Bi^ ii' i Ashok Review Petition No. 21 of 2011. PETITIONER Director, Regional Leprosy Trairttng^ & Research Institute, Lalpur. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh &0thers APPLICATION FOR REVIEWOFTHE ORDER DATED 04.02.2011, PASSED IN W.P.NO. 4881/2005. SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K.Aanihotri, J. Present: Shri R. Pradhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this08m day ofApril, 2011) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this Court disposed of W.P.No.4881 of 2005 (Mrs. Reena Masih v. Stateof Chhattisgarh & 0^ers)on 04.02.2011, in terms ofthe decision ofthis Court in Dinesh KumarBhagoria v. State of Chattisgarh &0thers . Shri Pradhan, praysthat since no specifictime limithas been prescribed in the order dated 04.02.2011, the hligh Power Caste Scrutiny Committee (for short "the Committee") may be directed to consider and d^cide the case of the writpetitioner i.e. Mrs. Reena Masih,within a penod offour months, as fixed by this Court in Dinesh KumarBhagoria (supra). 3. On perusal of the order dated 04.02.2011, it is evident that the said petition was disposed of in terms of the order passed in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria (supra). There is no ambiguity in the said order and the same isclear and unambiguous. The order dated 04.02.2011 hasto be read along with order dated 19.08.2010 passed in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoha fsupra^.Accordingly, the Committee is directed to decide the case of the petitioner as per the time fixed by this Courtin Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria (supra) i.e. four months. 4. In viewofforegoing,the review petition is disposed of. ^^•botri Satist Judge 1 W.P.(S) No. 3338/2007, decided on 19.08.2010