IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.374 of 2004 Date of Decision 29.09.2010 Prahlad Singh ...... Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr.J.S.Rattu, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent-State. Mr.Shakti Gautam, Advocate, for Mr.Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 to 5. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J: Challenge in this petition is to the judgment of acquittal dated 26.08.2003, passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhiwani. On scrutiny of the impugned judgment, the evidence, on the basis of which findings of fact have been returned by the trial Court, appears to have been appreciated in the right perspective. No such illegality much less irregularity or perversity was found or detected which may render the judgment as invalid. As such, these findings do not call for any interference at this revisional stage. No grounds to interfere. Dismissed. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 29.09.2010 mamta-II