PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Versus 1. Kalvan Singh Gautam, Son of Laté Jagamzath Singh Gautam, agsd about 56 years Assistant Teachsr, Middle "Schoén Bmpam, Biock Kasdol, Dishict Raipur (CG) The State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of School Educau'on, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) The District Education Oiiicer Raipur(CG) The Block Education omcer, Kasdol, Distn'ct Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNK3ER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON$TITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon1f1€ Mr. Satise K. Amlihotri, J.i Shri Malay Kumar Bhadun', counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.K.Iviishla, Panel Lawyer for the State. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner chailenges the transfer of the petitioner by the impugned transfer order dated 21.09.2007 (Annexure P/ 1), issued by the Speciai Secretaly, School Education Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, Raipur whereby the petitioner was transferred from Purva Madhyamik Shaala, Barpam', Block Kasdol, District Raipur to Govt. Primary School, Dhangaon, District Raipur (CG) on administrative ground. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner challenges the validity of the order on the sole ground as stated in Annexure P] 2 i.e. the petitioner is suffering from arthritis, chronic bronchitis and chest pain. ’I‘he petitioner fairly submits that the challenge to this impugned transfer order is not on the ground of malatidee or lack of competence or violation of any rules and regulaltions. It is well settled that the decision of the employer, to place a person on Hisa coum‘ or» CHHAWKSGARH AT mmsgpg: mums) N0. 191(2008 (Passed on this 11th day ofJanuary 2008) admmlstranw ex1gency 1n pubhe Interest cannot be questloned on the ground oi medmal problems oi the employee V 3. Admittedly, the petitioner has not chailenged the transfer on the ground of malaiidee or lack of competence or violation of any rules and regulaltions. 4. In View of the foregoing, there is no merit in the case and the petitioner has not made out the case for interference in the impugned transfer order dated 21.09.2007 (Annexure P/ l); 5. The petition is accordingly, dismissed at the motion stage itself. , L Sd/— V ‘ 1 Satish K.Agnihotri Judge y.y ’- "/a ,. -,, wre /