IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITL Writ Petition No. 1573 (SS) of 2011 Rajeevlochan and others …Petitioners Versus U.P. Cooperative Federation Ltd. and another …Respondents Mr. G.S. Negi, learned counsel present for the petitioners. Mr. Rajesh Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate present for the respondent no. 1. Mr. Ravi Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, Advocate present for respondent no. 2. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. G.S. Negi, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Rajesh Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for respondent no. 1 and Mr. Ravi Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, learned counsel for respondent no. 2. 2. According to the petitioners, they are the employees of Uttarakhand State Co-operative Federation Ltd. and earlier they were the employees of U.P. Co-operative Federation Ltd. They are not being given the arrears and other emoluments by the U.P. Co-operative Federation Ltd. As admitted by the learned counsel for the parties that this matter stands covered by the decision of this Court in Writ Petition No. 676 (SS) of 2011. The issue is as to whether the petitioners who were the employees of Uttarakhand State Co-operative Federation Ltd. and who were earlier the employees of U.P. Co-operative Federation Ltd. are liable to get post retiral dues, as is being claimed. 3. The matter is decided in favour of the petitioner (i.e. similarly situated person in Writ Petition No. 676 (SS) of 2011, which in turn is based upon an earlier decision of this Court passed in Writ Petition No. 1176 (SS) of 2005, which was confirmed in special appeal being Special Appeal No. 176 of 2006). The writ petition is therefore disposed of 2 in favour of the petitioners in terms of the order dated 28.6.2011 passed in Writ Petition No. 676 (SS) of 2011. 4. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) Dated: 18.11.2011 VKG