IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 210 of 2011 Devendra Gupta ……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ………. Respondents Mr. V.P. Bahuguna, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Nandan Raya, A.G.A. for the State/respondent nos.1 & 2 Date of Judgment : 24.03.2011 JUDGMENT Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. No case for interfering with the First Information Report has been made out. It is the contention of the petitioner that the place where the goods in question were found is in occupation of another person, in his capacity as a tenant. It has been stated that it is not known, whether those goods are Government goods or not. These are questions of facts to be gone in, in course of investigation. Therefore, no case for interference has been made out and as such, the writ petition is disposed of with the observation that in the event, petitioner cooperates with the investigation, due regards thereof shall be given by the Investigating Officer. (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 24.03.2011 Aswal