IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42098 of 2010 1. MAHANTH RAM SUNDER DAS 2. SHAMBHU SINGH--------PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 26.3.2011 Heard counsel for the petitioners and the State. Informant is the brother of the deceased. He is not an eye-witness. First Information Report under Sections 302,201/34 of the Indian Penal Code has been lodged in which petitioners are named as accused on suspicion, for the reason that the informant has deposed against the petitioners and that might have been the reason for killing of his brother. Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no eye-witness to the occurrence. Considering the contradiction in the statement of the witnesses examined during investigation final form was submitted, protest petition was also dismissed under section 203 of the Cr. P.C. on the basis of the order passed in revision, Cognizance has been taken against the petitioners, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners Mahanth Ram Sunder Das and Shambhu Singh is allowed. 2 Petitioners above named in the event of his arrest/surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM, Sitamarhi in connection with Dumra P.S. case No. 169 of 2006 ( G.R. No. 1378 of 2006) subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Petitioners aforesaid will cooperate with the trial and make themselves available on the date fixed in the trial. A. Kumar ( Mridula Mishra, J.)