IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY FRIDAY, THE 5TH AUGUST 2011 / 14TH SRAVANA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 2501 of 2011() ------------------------------------ CRRP.55/2007 of THE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT, IRINJALAKUDA ORDER NO.36983/05 OF EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE COURT, MUKUNDAPURAM, IRINJALAKUDA .................... PETITIONER(S): REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- THILAKAN, S/O.KOCHUKULAM GOPALAN, PULLUR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER N.C.SADANANDAN, S/O.NADUVALIPPARAMBIL CHENDAN, PULUR, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH CHAKYAT RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER ---------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, IRINJALAKUDA.PIN-680 121 3. REMESAN, S/O.PUTHUKATTIL NEELAKANTAN, PULLUR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK-680 683. R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.B.VINOD THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts CRMC.NO.2501/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEX 1 COPY AND TRANSLATED COPY OF THE CONDITIONAL ORDER DATED 22/03/2006 ANNEX 2 COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 31/03/2006 ANNEX 3 COPY OF THE FINAL ORDER IN ORDER NO.36983/05 DATED 11/06/2007 ANNEX 4 COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL.R.P.NO.55/2007 DATED 07/07/2011 RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts B.P. RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No. 2501 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 5th day of August, 2011. O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner was the revision petitioner in Crl.R.P No.55 of 2007 on the file of the Addl. Sessions Court, Irinjalakuda. I am not inclined to entertain this application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C as against the impugned judgment passed in Crl.R.P No.55 of 2007. In my considered view, it will be a second revision in the guise of Section 482 Cr.P.C. However, it is open to the petitioner to agitate his grievances before a competent civil court, if so advised. It is well settled that finding of the criminal court is not binding on the civil court. Accordingly, this Crl.M.C is dismissed. sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE. rv