THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL PETITION No.2652 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner seeks quashing of the order passed in Crl.R.P.No.92 of 2007 dated 07.03.2008 on the file of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, and to permit him to adduce necessary evidence to prove the case. For the first time the matter was listed on 02.05.2008, and after a lapse of two years, it is listed today before this Court. Hence, it is clear that the petitioner has not evinced any interest in the matter. The petitioners herein filed a private complaint before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Imbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District in C.C. No.157 of 2001 against the first respondent-accused for the offence under Section 420 of I.P.C. Charge sheet was filed in the said C.C, P.Ws.1 to 4 were examined, Exs.P.1 to P.9 were marked on behalf of the prosecution and the case was coming up for arguments, at that stage, Crl.M.P.No.876 of 2007 was filed under Section 91 Cr.P.C and the same was dismissed on 29.06.2007. Thereafter, the prosecution filed Crl.M.P.No.1306 of 2007 under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act praying the Court to send Exs.P.3 to P.5 to Government Expert for comparison. The trial Court dismissed the said application by order dated 31.08.2007. Aggrieved by the same, the State preferred Crl.R.P.No.92 of 2007 before the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, and the learned Sessions Judge, after re- assessing the entire evidence, dismissed the said revision confirming the order dated 31.08.2007 passed by the trial Court in Crl.M.P.No.1306 of 2007. Aggrieved by the same, the present criminal petition is filed by the petitioner. The trial Court as well as the revisional Court have discussed the entire evidence available on record and rightly held that the certified copies of the documents cannot be sent for comparision with the admitted signatures of the accused, and there is every possibility to cause delay in disposal of the case. In the circumstances, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned orders. The Criminal Petition is accordingly dismissed. ________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J 26th April, 2010 va