WP(C) 2108/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T VAIIPHEI This writ petition is directed against the order dated 05.10.2010 issued by the respondent No.3 suspending the license issued to the petitioner for running a Fa ir Price Shop vide the license No. BJES.34/90/36 of Bhoukamari Village under Pub -Betbari Samabai Samity on the ground that a criminal case was registered agains t him which amounts to violation of the terms and conditions of the license. It is stated by Ms M Das, the learned counsel for the petitioner, which is not disp uted by Mr PJ Talukdar, the learned State counsel that as no opportunity of hear ing has been given to the petitioner even after the expiry of 90 days from the d ate of issuing of the impugned suspension order, this case is squarely covered b y the decision of this Court dated 11.03.2011 in WP (C) No. 372/2011. I have car efully perused the decision of this Court and found in that case that since no o pportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner even after a lapse of 90 days computing from the date of suspension, the order of suspension was treated by th is Court as non-est as on that date and accordingly directed the State responden ts to allow the petitioner to run his Fair Price Shop. In this case also as the fact of the case as well as the law points involved are of the same, this writ p etition can be disposed of by issuing similar directions. In the result, the impugned order dated 05.10.2010 is hereby quashed. Consequent ly, the State respondents are directed to allow the petitioner to run his Fair P rice Shop unless any lawful order is passed in the meantime by the State respond ents prohibiting him to run his Fair Price Shop. The respondent authorities shal l also ensure supply of essential commodities to the petitioner for distributing the same to his consumers. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the above terms, but by direct ing the parties to bear their respective costs.