1 CA.11410.2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11410 OF 2009 IN CIVIL APPLIATION (ST.) NO. 11003 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 662 OF 1992 (Baba s/o Laxman Amnare VERSUS Bapurao S/o Ramji and others) Mr. D.N. Patki, Advocate for the applicant Mr. M.V. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent no.1 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders P.C.:- 1] Heard Mr. Patki extensively. The appellant- original defendant no.1 expired on 11.3.2004. The names of legal representatives are disclosed as Shankar and Kishan in paragraph no.3 of the Application with an indication, that there are no other legal representatives except the two. There is certainly delay in communication. Delay being not deliberate, needs to be condoned. The appellant Baba having expired, could not be communicated by the learned counsel. 2] Consequently the Application is partly allowed as under:- 2 CA.11410.2009 . Legal representatives of appellant Baba S/o Laxman Amnare be brought on record within 14 days. Delay in such exercise is condoned. Liberty is granted to make a separate Application to bring on record the legal representatives of Bapurao Ramji. Sd/- DT. : 16.04.2010 (K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.) arp