IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1612 of 2008 ABHAY KUMAR Versus RAJ KUMAR ----------- 2 19.9.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court, the order passed by the Court below under Section 15 of the B.B.C. Act, does not suffer from any jurisdictional error especially when it is found that the relationship of landlord and tenant is admitted and the last rent paid of Rs. 700/- as admitted by the petitioner, the defendant-tenant has been only directed to be paid both by way of arrear and current. Counsel for the petitioner however, says that there is a mistake in the calculation of the arrears inasmuch as it appears to him that the Court below has calculated the amount of Rs. 11,700/- by taking into account that the monthly rent was Rs. 900/- per month. If that be so, the petitioner will file an application and explain this aspect of the matter in the Court below and the Court below after making their calculation will pass an order to modify the amount of Rs. 11,700/- if it finds that such calculation was based on at the rate of Rs. 900/- per month and not Rs. 700/- per month. With the aforementioned observations and direction, this civil revision application is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)