1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2854 OF 2007 [Khushaba Vishwanath Gawhane Vs. The Collector Beed and others] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri. Md.Mustafa Ahmed Momin,Advocate for petitioner Shri. V.B.Ghatge, A.G.P. for Respondents. Shri. R.T.Nagargoje,Advocate for R.NO.3. .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 10TH AUGUST, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties. We have perused affidavit in reply. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned Government Resolution does not apply to the hawkers like petitioner. In the light of the reply, we find that no 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders adverse action is taken against the petitioner for violating the conditions of the licence. The petitioner may resort to alternative efficacious remedy in case petitioner is running his business under the licence. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- Sd/- [K.K. TATED,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] MTK