1 S.A. 657/2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 657/2011 WITH C.A. NO. 5803/2011 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATED : 7th December, 2011. Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Pramod Gaikwad h/f Mr. A.G. Talhar, Advocate for respondents. 1. Heard. 2. There are concurrent findings given by trial court on facts. No document was placed on record to show joint ownership. Therefore, both the Courts have held against the appellant. 3. The contention of the ld. counsel for appellant that there is joint ownership, falsified by evidence of P.W. Nos.1 and 2. They have categorically admitted status of respondent No.1 who is Gram Panchayat. From the perusal of grounds taken in the second appeal, none of the ground appealed to this Court to consider this second appeal. That apart, entries taken by the City Survey office have not been challenged by the appellant atleast till disposal of the appeal by the 2 S.A. 657/2011 lower appellate Court, as observed by the lower appellate court. Therefore, in absence of any evidence on record, a view taken by both the Courts below can not be defaulted. The appeal is dismissed summarily. In view of this, civil application stands rejected. [S.S. SHINDE,J.] ts k/Dec.2011/7th/sa657.11