CRM-M No. 18778 of 2011 **** Rupinder Kaur v. State of Punjab Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Mathur, AAG, Punjab. Mr. S.S.Majithia, Advocate for the complainant. **** This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed in case bearing FIR No. 44 dated 14.05.2011, under Section 420 IPC registered at Police Station Ghoman, Police District Batala, District Gurdaspur. Learned counsel has argued that the petitioner is a house wife and even if the allegations are true they would be against her husband and son. Learned counsel for the complainant has, however, stated that it is a case where even the petitioner had taken some money and had held out assurances. It is also the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that two inquiries have exculpated the petitioner and she has been found guilty on the basis of third inquiry. Learned AAG, on instructions from ASI Harjhit Singh,has accepted this fact. Keeping in view this entire factual matrix, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In case she is arrested, she shall be released on bail by the investigating officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE August 04, 2011 sunita