IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9160 of 2010 1. MD.YUNUS , S/O LATE GULZAR 2. MD. SHAKIL, S/O MD. YUNUS BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – DIPOL, P.S. – JOGBANI (O.P., BATHANAHA), DISTRICT – ARARIA ………. Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ………… Opposite Party ----------- 3 14.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel the State. Two of the offences are non-bailable. One for the offence under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. It is only reaction of informant for leaving his job due to differences. And next one is for the offence under S.C. & S.T. Prevention of Atrocities Act which is non-bailable if that finds no corroboration in course of investigation, that can only be taken into consideration after submission of the charge sheet (final form), otherwise, anticipatory bail is not maintainable. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, presently, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. However, petitioners are directed to approach the court where case is pending, in regular side, where their prayer shall be decided on merit without being prejudiced by this rejection order on the same day. Praful ( Mandhata Singh, J.)