1 cri4781.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4781 OF 2010 Navanath Mahadeo Bahir Age : 25 years, Occ : Agri., R/o Katewadi, Tq. Jamkhed, Dist. Ahmednagar ..APPLICANT -VERSUS- The State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4546 OF 2010 1. Ratan W/o Sandip Bahir Age : 25 years, Occ : Household, 2. Rajubai W/o Rohidas Bahir Age : 61 years, Occ : Nil, Both R/o Katewadi, Tq. Jamkhed, Dist. Ahmednagar. ..APPLICANTS -VERSUS- The State of Maharashtra and another ..RESPONDENTS ......... Mr. K.S. Bhore, advocate for applicants. Mr. D.V. Tele, A.P.P. for respondents. ........ (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) DATE : 7 th December, 2010. PER COURT : 1. The applications are for bail. 2 cri4781.10 2. The marriage between deceased Anita and Tatyaram Mahadeo Bahir was performed prior to about 6 years of alleged incident. She had given birth to a male child and female child but the children did not survive. At the relevant time, she was having infant female child. The F.I.R. purports to show that the husband and his relatives used to demand Rs. 4000/- to 5000/- from the parents of deceased Anita. She was being subjected to matrimonial cruelty. It is alleged that she was unable to bear the matrimonial cruelty and as such committed suicide on 16.07.2010 by consuming the poisonous insecticides. The dead body of Anita was, however, found in a well situated on Southern side of residential house of the applicants. 2. So far as the present applicants are concerned, the allegations made against them are to the effect that they used to induce the husband of deceased Anita to trouble her. It is alleged that they used to instigate her husband to make demands and to cause harassment of Anita on account of non-fulfillment of demand of Rs. 4000/- to Rs. 5000/-. The avernments in the F.I.R. and other statements prima facie show that there are omnibus statements about the role played by the applicants as instigators of the husband of deceased Anita. 3 cri4781.10 3. Considering the fact situation of the present case, it would be appropriate to release the applicants on bail on certain conditions. Hence, their applications are allowed. The applicants are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing of bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand), each along with one solvent surety, to the satisfaction of the Court of Sessions and on further condition that they shall not contact any of the prosecution witnesses and shall not make any attempt to tamper with prosecution evidence. (V.R.KINGAONKAR) JUDGE gas/cri4781.10