IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 28537 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.10.2011 Sham Lal alias Shama .. Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P. S. Bajwa, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 108 dated 2.4.2010, registered under Sections 395, 34 IPC read with Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station, Maqsudan, District Jalandhar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. The FIR is dated 2.4.2010. The petitioner is sought to be implicated on the disclosure statements of Ajmer Singh and Roshan Lal, who confessed commission of crime in the present case, when they were arrested in FIR No. 10 dated 8.1.2011, registered under Sections 392 and 412 IPC, Police Station, Nakodar. Learned counsel for the State submitted that besides the present FIR, there are seven other FIRs registered against the petitioner. In three of them, the allegations are of robbery. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the antecedents of the petitioner, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Dismissed. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 14.10.2011/mk