ir :2^p"3i'n>'.- ^ 1',-^^^ ('si?''1'1 'S'SSfMS'S^ PETmONER HIOH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH: BILASPUR WRTT PETITION N0.38S1 OF M04 Kavita Gupta, W/o Shri Rahesh Gupta, aged about 31 years, OccupaUon Service, Ex. N.MA., R/o Manwidragarh, TehsB Manendragarh, District Korea (CG). RESPONDENTS Versus 1. The State of Ghhatfisgarh, throigh the Secretary, Department of HeaUh Servfces, Mantralay, D.K.S. Building, Raipur. 2. Joint Director, Leprosy, Dlrectorate, HeaBft Senrice, Raipur (CG). 3. DirectDr, HeaKh Servtees, Raipur (<X3). 4; CMef Medical and HeaKh Offlcer, Korea, Distrid Iforea, Baikunthpur (CG). 5. The District Coltector, Korea, BaNcunthpur (CG). 6. The Union of India, ftwough ttie Secretary, Ministry of Health, Govemment of Indja, Nirman Bhawin, New Ddhi. (Writ petition under Artfcte 226/227 ofthe ConsfltuUon of Inda) Singte Bench: Hon'bte Shri SaBah K. AgnBiotri, •I. Present: Shri SunB Sahu, counset for the peUUoner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer fc»rth®Stat^respwidents No. 1to5. t4s. Sharmila Sfnghai, Asslstant Solfcitor Genwal for the Unfon <rf India/respondent No.6. ORALORreR (Passed on this 7" day of August, 2008) Wfith the consent of teamed cwmsel appearing for the parties, the peBBon is heard finalfy. 2) By this petitfon under Articto 226/227 of ttie ConstttuUon <rf India the peUtioner seeks to challenge ftie tegaWy, vaNdHy and propriety of the order dated 7-2-^03 (Annexure-P/11), whereby one month's notfee belore renwwal of the petiUoner was issued under the ordeis <rf the Govemmer* of India, Directorate ofHealth Seivtees, New DelN. 3) The petitiCTwr was appointsd in servfee vkle order dated 29-10-2004 (Annexure-P/1) under the tenns and conditkms lakl down In the said onter. Thereafter the petltioner conUnued to work on the same post till the ^fSSBS^. ••'y^~.^. '"^ '..?*»& Gowri impugned order dated 7-2-2003 (Annexure-P/11) was fassed glving effect to after a period of one month from that date. 4) Learned counsel appearing (br the petiUonar, as well as for ttie respondsnts submit ttiat the fewts and quesfion of law invdVBd in Uie present petitfon is similar to that in the writ p^Uon No.1794 of 2003 (?antosh Kumar Sahu vs. State of ChhatBsgarh a ottiers), whteh was disposed <rf vide oider dated 26-6-2003, wheiyin it has been directed that tfthe peStioner makes a representaBon wKhin a period of ona morth from today, concemed authority shaU took into tha matter and if fte services of ttie petifionsr can be absorbed then they can conskter his case for absorptton/a ojntment." 5) In view of the above, this petiUon stands disposed of with the direction that if the petittoner makes a representaUon to the concemed authority wtthin a pertod of ww month from today, tt shaW oonslcter and decide the same on its own merits, in accordance wtth law, wKhm a reasonabte perfod. tf It is permitted to absorb fte peUUoner, (he same may also be considered. 6) Consequentfy, M.(W.).P.No.4270Q004 aml I.AJMos.7945/aXM & 10610005 standcBsposedtrf. —-— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge