1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CP No.35/2010 in Writ Petition No.1110/2009 Kailash Ramchandra Shrirame Vs. Smt. Shailaja w/o Shailesh Daburkar and another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. P.D. Meghe, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. B.G. Kuklarni, Advocate for the respondent . CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 10th JUNE 2010. 1] Heard learned counsel for the respective parties extensively. Subsistence allowance for the period of suspension of the petitioner herein is the root cause of controversy. The case is certainly covered in terms of Rule 37 (2) (F) of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (conditions of service)Rules, 1981. The petitioner herein, as could be seen from letter dated 7.11.2009 was paid 50% allowance in the tune of Rs. 7792/- by one cheque. It is thus clear that if the eligibility of the petitioner for rest of the period is in the same tune of Rs. 7792/-. Writ Petition was disposed on 6.10.2009. The enquiry was completed on 22.4.2010 and the petition was dismissed. The entitlement primarily of the petitioner for the period as per the directions of the 2 Writ Court in Writ Petition NO. 1110/2009, will naturally be applicable and taking into consideration the ground realities, it appears that the petitioner will be entitled to receive an amount of around Rs. 38,000/- towards the balance subsistence allowance. However, the figure is reduced and brought to Rs. 35,000/-. The Management shall make good payment of the same up to 19th July, 2010. In addition, the petitioner is entitled to the arrears of 6th pay commission, as per Rules. With the above observation, the contempt petition is disposed of. No. costs. (K.U. Chandiwal ) JUDGE Ambulkar.