CR No.6932 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.6932 of 2009 Decided on : 27.11.2009 M/s The Light Sewing Machine Works & another ... Petitioners versus M/s Sudha Enterprises & another ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. R.P.Dudeja, Advocate for the petitioners. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed against the order dated 18.08.2009, closing the evidence of the petitioner (defendant in suit) as well as order dt. 21.09.2009 whereby the application for reviewing the said order has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that on 18.08.2009 the petitioner got a little late and consequently his evidence was closed before he could reach the Court and that is why the application for reviewing was moved on the same date. She further states that the matter is fixed for 28.11.2009 for rebuttal evidence and arguments. She further states that the petitioner undertakes to lead his entire evidence on his own responsibility and that no prejudice would be caused to the respondent. CR No.6932 of 2009 -2- In my opinion, it would be in the interest of justice if the petitioner is allowed one opportunity to lead his entire evidence. Consequently, the impugned orders are set aside and the ld. Trial Court is directed to give one opportunity to the petitioner to lead his entire evidence on his own responsibility. This revision petition stands disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of Court Secretary. November 27, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE