1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2325 OF 2009 G.M. Divakar & ors.......Petitioners versus Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Navy) & ors ........Respondents. Mr. N.S. Pillai adv. for the Petitioner Ms. S.V. Bharucha for respondent nos. 1 2 & 4 Ms. P.V. Thorat for respondent no.3. CORAM: J.N. PATEL Acting .C.J. AND B. R. GAVAI, J. DATED : 01st February, 2010. P.C.: 1. The petitioner has prayed for calling for the records and proceedings pertaining to the election of the office bearers of the Association proposed to be held on 25-11-2009. It is the contention of the petitioner that as per the bye-laws respondent no. 1 has no authority to appoint the election officer for conducting the election of All India Defence Accounts Association. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies on bye-law no. (ii) of the Constitution/Bye-laws of the Association notified under 2 CCS(RSA) Rules notified as O.M.No.2/5/94-JCA dated 28-7-1994. 3. In the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of the respondent no.3 it has been stated that the respondent no.2 was appointed as election officer by the Central Body. It has also been categorically stated that respondent no.1 has no role to play in the aforesaid election. 4. In view of the categorical statement made on behalf of the respondent that the respondent no.1 has no role to play in the election of the Association and the appointment of respondent no.2 as election officer was made by the Central Committee, we do not find that any case has been made out for interference in the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution. Hence petition is dismissed. (Acting C.J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.)