N .^r'; c^lov ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BLLASPUR fCHHATnSGARH) WRIT PETITION fSt N0. ^<r9^> QF 2006 PETITIONER ^^& / ^-"^y ^(^y %1W .,.^ •^".^ yy ^Smt. Chitralekha Wife ofShri Vijay Kumar Sonwani, aged about 32 years, Resident of Ward No. 28, Shitta Ward, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). RESPONDENTS ^ll-N VERSUS /l. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Women and Child Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). /2. The Commissioner, Women and Child Development, Raipur (C.G.). /3. The Collector, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). ^4. The Project Officer, Women and Child Development, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). /5. The District Programme Officer, Women and Child Development, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 6. Ttie Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). L / ^~1. The In-charge Public Relation Officer, Municipal Corporation, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). /8. Ku. Anita Soni D/o Shri Doman Soni, Resident of Near Telephone Office, Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE <^ 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE__0_F_W_RIT_IN_THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION ETC. ,fc- K HiGH COUin- Oj: CHHATnSGARH : BILASPUR PETiTIONER WR1T PETITION (3} N0.5590 OF 2006 Smt. ChitraleRha RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattlsgarh S Others Cift/rit Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of tndia) Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 5! Present:- Ms. Neha Verma, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, GovemmentAdvocate forthe State. ORDER/ORAU (Passed on this 1st day ofApril, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission ofthisCourttowithdrawthis petitionwith liberty to take recourse to other statutory forym, which may be available underthe provisionsof law. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. It is ordered,as prayed for. 4. Accordingly, the writ petitipn is dlsmissed as withdrawn with the above-stated liberty. 5. ' Certified copy of the impugned order may be returned back to the petitioneron retainjng a photocopyofthesame. i Sd/- 1 SatishK.Agnihotri i Judge Ashok