CRIMINAL MISC. M NO.19681 OF 2010 :{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: DECEMBER 15, 2011 Atul Rawat .....Petitioner VERSUS Japjee Kaur ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Munish Jolly, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. A.D.S.Sukhija, Advocate, for the respondent. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has filed this petition for directing Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ludhiana, to decide the application dated 10.4.2010 filed by the petitioner, seeking cancellation of interim order for maintenance passed under Sections 125(3), (4) and (5) and 127 (2) Cr.P.C. This limited prayer has been made and virtually was disposed of by this Court, while adjourning the case on 13.8.2010 with direction to the trial Court to decide the application by the next date CRIMINAL MISC. M NO.19681 OF 2010 :{ 2 }: of hearing. Grievance is that inspite of direction of this Court, the application is still pending. Once this Court has directed the trial Court to decide the application, the trial Court ought to have complied with the order. The trial Court would owe an explanation in this regard. The Sessions Judge would obtain an explanation from the Court concerned and forward the same to the Registrar (General) of this Court, who would place the same before this Court. Further action may then follow. In the meantime, the trial Court is directed to decide the application on the next date fixed and positively before 18.01.2012 even if it has to prepone the hearing of the case after due notice to counsel/parties. The present petition is accordingly disposed of. Copy of the order be sent to the trial Court concerned through Sessions Judge, Ludhiana. December 15, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE