HI6H_CTURT OF 01HATTIS6ARH AT BILASPW W. P.fSl No. 1652 of Z007 Petitioner Respondents Versus Korneliyus Khalkho S/OLcrte Johan Idiolkho Aged Aout 51 yea-S R/0 Keradih Tehsil Kunkuri District Jashpur [C.&] 1. Stot-e of Chhafrtisgarh •throughs- -the Secmtcry Tribal Welfore Oeparhnent, &.K.& <won, Mantraloya, Roapu1 (C.6.) 2. Secretmy Oeport-ment of Finance, &.K.S. Bhavtm, Murtralaya, Roipu- (C.6.) 3. CommisMoner. Tribal Welfare t>epartroent, Joshpur (C.6.) 4. Assistant Commisaoner, Tribal Welfore &epertment, Oistrict Jwjfipw (Cj6.) SB; l^n'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. A|nihotri. J Present: Ms. Binu Ptri'hak, Advocate forthe petitioner. AA.'xArvind Oubcy, Panel Laoya' fbr Stat'e/r'espondents. OR&ER (Passed on •l+iisZl'* bay of Manh, 2007) 1. The question of k»»inwlved herein asto -hether the petitiwier is t^- entitted to regular pay scale w.e.f. the dnte of initial appointment or from the dote of completron of prebation period. 2. Lenrned counsel appearing for the petitionep as wwll os for •rtie State/respondents jointly submit that the facts ond question of kmf involved the present writ petitton ore the same to •rtia*of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwwi and others vs. Stdte Gwvwnment of Oihattisgarh Aothers), whichNws allowed vide ordw dated 7.U.2006. 3. In view of the <d»ve-st<»tedsubmissions made by teomed oounsel for the parties, -the »witpetitwn is ollowed in 'the same terms. No order os to costs. - -_ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge SiAfuah t-