IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.13431-M of 2010 Date of Decision:25.10.2010 Mona Aggarwal .... Petitioner Versus Income Tax Officer .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. V.K. Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondent. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the complaint No.102A dated 25.1.2010 (P-1) and order of summoning dated 25.1.2010 (P-2). Written request for an adjournment has been filed by learned counsel for the respondent. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he was not informed of the said written request. However, he has fairly stated that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all the requisite pleas before the trial Court. He also prays that the trial Court may be directed to decide the complaint expeditiously. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. 25.10.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE