In the Hon'bleHiah CourtofChhattishaarh atBilaspur C.G. APP^ Cfv;! IVIiscellaneousGivilADDealno. f^>U> 2010 1»^\'r" Sm^ ftsHC1 Appellant Smt. Suraj Bai aged 62 years Plaintiff ^ ^.-•^''>^,t^Widow of late Shri Premlal Tamrakar, w y"^ .-^C^€. ^ *'«-•• .•>•.« ^W'S8' •^ «s »• Respondent Defendant -1. 2. 3. 4. Resident of Tamer Para, Durg C.G. Versus Sheo Kumar age 49 years Son of late Shri Ramswaroop Tamrakar, Smt. Prema Bai aged 65 years, Widow of lateShriRam Swaroop Tamra Pawan Kumar aged 36 years Son oflate Shri Ramswaroop Tamrakar, Resident of Tamer para, Durg C.G. Smt. Viidya aged 34 years Wife ofShri Ramesh Tamrakar, Resident of Ambagarh Chauki, Tahsil Dongargaon Distt. Rajnandgaon Ku.Shail aged 32 years Daughter of late Shri Ram Swaroop Resident of Usha Silai Kendra, Bramhanpara, near Panchmukhi Temple, Durg C.G. Ku. Sushila Tamrakar aged 28 years Daughterof late Shri Premlal Tamrakar, Resident of Geeta Bhavan, Anand Chauk, Pachari para, Durg (C.G.) State of Ghhattishgarh, Through the Collector, Durg. V0 R"''li--'nr ifl^i' 'f!:<!' <11«iyil as*<iah MA€^ 3^/o TSET -41.41cf <|, ©•ai'M'is, c^c^ (j>/C) ^.^^//° Vs!^ n & 311^1 4^+ (lclh'«^) <MI^I-EEt f^*ii+ OTT SIlt^I aiiiqi --®'r 'e^inRti^d 3R^T S.B. Hon'bleShri dustice N.K. Aaatwa 22-03^010 None for the appellant. Shri Sameer Behar, Paiel The matter is called twice. appears nor any representation appellant. tt seems that the appell tillfclll-f 'WRff 41%1IZt <filt(lt ^ stfiiT sn^i Lavjyer fi yerfortheState. 3n both oecasions, none s made on behalf of the ?nt may net be interested in prosecutingthe matter. Accordingly, tbe appeat is disnjissed tor non-prosecution. Sd/- N.K.Agarwal Judge '^- l^y ?