{1} FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATIO NO.5780 OF 2009 Hanifabi Sk.Maheboob Saheb & ors. Vs. Sugrabai L. Huche & ors. IN SA NO.348 OF 1997 Office notes, office memorandum of coram, appearances, court’s order or directions and Registrar’s order. Court’s or Judge’s orders Shri A.B.Khorasekar, advocate for respondent no.1 to 3 *** Coram : K.U.Chandiwal, J. Date: 24th June 2009. 01- The application is moved by the subsequent purchaser contending that during pendency of the appeal they have acquired rights in the property and hence the name of applicants no.2 to 4 having been recorded in the revenue record as owner and possessor, they should be implead as party appellant in the present appeal. I do not see any reason to entertain the application as during lis the transaction has taken place, whatever the fate of the appeal would be, it will have its binding force on the subsequent purchaser. The application is dismissed. [K.U.CHANDIWAL] JUDGE /mda/0609/ca5780.09