IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43685 of 2008 1. DAMODAR THAKUR 2. JHULAN THAKUR 3. BABLU THAKUR 4. PRAMOD THAKUR @ PRAMOD SHARMA 5. BINOD THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 21/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State as also for the complainant. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a complaint case under Sections- 313, 147, 323 and 379 of I.P.C. The submission is of a false implication for reason of a land-dispute in Title Suit No.9/07 which is pending. The allegations are specific against respondent Nos.4 and 5 with regard to Section-313 of I.P.C. The application is rejected with regard to petitioners 4 and 5. Let petitioners-1 to 3, against whom allegations are general and omnibus, let the petitioners 1 to 3 above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri U.K. Yadav, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chapra in U.T. No.172/08 - 2 - arising out of Complaint Case No.2885/07. It goes without saying that the considerations for regular bail are different from those for anticipatory bail and rejection of the latter cannot prejudice the former. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )