1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No. 6841 of 2011 (Sk Suleman Sk Mandar v. Sk Baba & Anr.) in Second Appeal No. 380 of 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for the applicant PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. On perusal of the Judgment of the first Appeal Court, it is found that both the Courts below held that the appellant / plaintiff is in exclusive possession of the suit house. The appellant / plaintiff had no occasion earlier to make any application for injunction because he did not apprehend of dispossession. But, after the second appeal is admitted, he says, the respondents are trying to dispossess him. In view of pendency of the second appeal and in view of the aforesaid situation, the appellant / plaintiff deserves protection of temporary injunction. There shall be order in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ of Civil Application No. 6841 of 2011. 3. Civil Application stands disposed of. 15th July, 11 ( A.V.NIRGUDE, J. ) SRM/ 2