1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. WRIT PETITION NO.: 574 OF 2011 *** 1. Application under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. moved by third party viz. Veerbhushan S/o Motial Kandarkar Respondent No.2, has been allowed by trial Court. 2. Learned counsel contends that petitioner has not claimed any relief against him and he has no connection with the suit property. Trial Court has noted the defence in suit that petitioner/ plaintiff has encroached on a public road and it has also found that applicant before it is in possession of land adjacent to land of petitioner. As the dispute pertains to land in possession of petitioner and its nature it has found the Respondent No.2 necessary party. The trial Court has considered relevant material, there is no jurisdictional error or perversity. I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere in the matter. Petition rejected. [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.] Dated:25/01/2011. ans/574