IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY SECOND APPEAL No.364 of 2011 Between: Kukkadapu Raja … Appellant And Balanagu Ramabhakta Hanumantha Rao … Respondent Counsel for the appellant: None This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY SECOND APPEAL No.364 of 2011 JUDGMENT:- On 11.11.2011, learned counsel for the appellant was not present. As the record disclosed that notice sent to the sole respondent returned un-served, the appellant was permitted to send fresh notice to the respondent to the correct address. Today, when the matter is called, neither the counsel for the appellant is present nor fresh notice has been served on the respondent. From these two reasons, it is reasonable to presume that the appellant is not interested in pursuing his cause in the second appeal. Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel, interim order, dated 21.04.2011, is vacated and SAMP.No.904 of 2011 is dismissed. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 03.12.2011 ES