IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2009 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 36027 of 2009(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.V. CHANDRASEKHARAN, S/O. SETHUMADHAVA WARRIER, THRIKKAZHIKUNNATH WARIYAM, KAVUVATTOM, CHERPULASSERY P.O., PALAKKAD DIST. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER , MALABAR DEVASWOM BOAR D, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE. 2. THE MANAGING TRUSTEE, CHERPULASSERY SREE AYYAPPANKAVU DEVASWAM, CHERPULASSERY, PALAKKAD DIST. ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN,SC,MALABAR DEVASWOM FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.36027 OF 2009 (W) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of December, 2009 J U D G M E N T Aggrieved by Ext.P2, decision No.9, petitioner has filed Ext.P3 revision together with Ext.P4 application seeking stay of Ext.P2. The revision and stay petition are pending before the first respondent and complaining delay in its disposal, the writ petition is filed. 2. Heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent also. 3. If as stated by the petitioner, the revision and the stay petition have been filed, it is up to the first respondent to deal with it. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider Ext.P3 with notice to the petitioner and 2nd respondent as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. In the meanwhile, it will also be open to the petitioner to move the first respondent for orders on Ext.P4 stay petition also. WPC.No.36027 /09 :2 : Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No.36027 /09 :3 :