IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA GOVERNMENT APPEAL ( S.J.) NO. 26 OF 1997 (Appeal against the Judgment and Order dated 14.3.1997 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Trial No. 223 of 1994/9 of 1997.) ================================================= THE STATE OF BIHAR …… APPELLANT Versus CHANDESHWAR YADAV, SON OF JAG NARAIN YADAV, R/O VILLAGE JIWABIGHA, P.S. KUTUMBA, DISTT. AURANGABAD. ……. RESPONDENT ================================================= Appearance: For the Appellant : Mr. R.B. Roy ‘Raman’ A.P.P. For the Respondent : Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. ================================================= W I T H CRIMINAL REVISION No. 411 of 1997 INDU DEVI, WIFE OF RAM JANAM SHARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JEEVA BIGHA, P.S. AMBA, DISTT. AURANGABAD. .... .... PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. CHANDESHWAR YADAV, SON OF JAGNARAYAN YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – JEEVA BIGHA, P.S. AMBA, DISTT. AURANGABAD. .... .... RESPONDENTS ================================================= P R E S E N T THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH Anjana Prakash, J: The Appeal and Revision has been filed against the acquittal of Respondent Chandeshwar Yadav under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Trial No. 223 of 1994/9 of 1997 by a Judgment dated 14.3.1997. 2. On going through the Judgment of acquittal, I find that the same was based on cogent materials and after a full consideration of the Patna High Court G. APP. (SJ) No.26 of 1997 dt.07-07-2011 2 evidence adduced on behalf of the prosecution. 3. In the result, having no merit in the two applications, the same are dismissed. (Anjana Prakash, J.) Patna High Court, Patna, Dated, 7th July, 2011. NAFR/S.ALI