IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2230 of 2011 DHANANJAY SINGH son of Satendra Narayan Singh, R.O.V Mohalla Patel Nagar, Ward No. 23 P.O.+P.S Daudnagar, Dist- Aurangabad (Bihar). …….Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Municipal Corporation and House Department, Bihar Patna namely Mr. Shashi Shekhar Sharma. 3. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad, namely Mr. Abhay Singh. 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive officer Nagar Panchayat, Daudnagar, Aurangabad, namely Shri Niwas Pandey. 5. The Executive officer Nagar Panchayat, Daudnagar, Aurangabad, namely Nausad Alam. 6. The Executive Engineer, Aurangabad, namely Mr. Satenarayan Paswan. 7. The Incharage Junior Engineer, Nagar Panchayat, Daudnagar, Aurangabad, namely Mr. Satenarayan Paswan. 8. The Mukh Parishad, Nagar Panchayat, Daudnagar, Aurangabad, namely Premanand Paswan………………………….Respondents. --------- For the petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Ms. Mohini Kumari, A. C to S. C. 14. For respondent no.5 : Mr. Krishna Kant Tiwari, Advocate. ------- 06/ 17.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner for initiating a proceeding of contempt against the opposite parties for non-compliance of order of this court dated 24.02.2011 by which CWJC No.24.02.2011 by which CWJC No.1369 of 2011 was disposed of with a direction to the opposite parties to decide the application of the petitioner within two months of its filing and if any dues are found to be admittedly payable the said amount should be paid by the said respondents immediately thereafter and if any amount is not found payable to the petitioner, the - 2 - respondents- authorities will be at liberty to reject the claim of the petitioner and the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the same before an appropriate forum. 3. The claim of the petitioner in the MJC petition is that the said order has not been complied. 4. A show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party no.3 stating that the said order has been complied on 06.08.2011 (Annexure-C) when a speaking order had been passed in compliance of the order of this court. In the said show cause unqualified apology has been tendered for the delay. 5. A supplementary show cause has been filed by opposite party no.5 stating that in compliance of the order of this court dated 24.02.2011 and also in view of order dated 06.08.2011 passed by respondent no.3 cheques have been issued for the petitioner. 6. Learned counsel for the opposite parties produces eight cheques of State Bank of India, Daudnagar Branch, Aurangabad bearing cheque no. 008399 dated 28.06.2011 for an amount of Rs.14906.00; cheque no.008400 dated 28.06.2011 for an amount of Rs.44671.00; cheque no.008401 dated 28.06.2011 for an amount of Rs.16932.00; cheque no.008402 dated 28.06.2011 for an amount of Rs.3808.00; cheque no.008403 dated 28.06.2011 for an amount of Rs.26815.00; cheque no.008404 dated 28.06.2011 for amount of Rs.11088.00; cheque no.008419 dated 10.08.2011 for an amount of Rs.95314.00; and cheque - 3 - no.008420 dated 10.08.2011 for an amount of Rs.100.00 totalling Rs.2,13,629.00 which are handed over by learned counsel for opposite parties to learned counsel for the petitioner in court by its permission. 7. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the order of this court has been substantially complied and accordingly this petition is disposed of. 8.However, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the aforesaid order dated 06.08.2011 passed by the Collector, Aurangabad, he will be at liberty to challenge the same before an appropriate forum as has already been directed by this court vide order dated 24.02.2011 passed in CWJC no.1369 of 2011. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)