THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.Nos.3358, 3462, 3609, 3863 & 3977 of 2007 COMMON ORDER: In all these three writ petitions, common questions of law and fact arises for consideration, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common order. It is the grievance of the petitioner(s) that the unofficial respondent(s) were appointed as Angwandi worker without possessing the requisite qualifications as required in the notification. It is their contention that the unofficial respondent(s) is neither a resident of the village nor possess the requisite educational qualification. In fact, the nativity certificates produced by them were not issued by proper authority. Therefore, the official respondents ought not to have taken into consideration of such nativity/residential certificates. The petitioner(s) being native of the village and possessing requisite educational qualifications of more than 10th class are fully qualified and eligible to be appointed as Anganwadi worker. Thus, the official respondents have denied appointment to the petitioner(s) to the post of Anganwadi worker. Though the official respondents have filed counter, but the same does not lead us to anywhere. The facts are not properly brought out and there is inconsistency in the stand taken by them. However, the unofficial respondent(s) had categorically asserted that they are more qualified than the petitioner(s) and apart from that, all belong to respective Panchayats and the certificates obtained by them as to their residential status is proper and valid, therefore, no interference is called for by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. I have given my earnest consideration to the respective submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and perused the impugned orders and other material made available on record. The issue involved in the present writ petitions is as to whether the unofficial respondent(s) possess requisite educational qualifications and the nativity/residential certificates produced by them are valid. These are all disputed questions of fact, which cannot be gone into by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, the petitioner(s) cannot be left without any remedy. Under those circumstances, without expressing any opinion on merits, the petitioner(s) are directed to file a detailed representation before the first respondent along with necessary documentary evidence. On filing such applications, the first respondent shall entertain the same and cause an enquiry after putting the unofficial respondent(s) on notice and hear them personally, if necessary, and pass appropriate orders as per law as to the eligibility of unofficial respondent(s) for appointment to the post of Anganwadi worker in their respective villages, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, the unofficial respondent(s), who were already appointed, shall continue to work in their respective villages. With the above direction, all the writ petitions are disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 6.12.2007 Note: Issue C.C in (3) days. B/o DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.Nos.3358, 3462, 3609, 3863 & 3977 of 2007 6.12.2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P.Nos.3358, 3462, 3609, 3863 & 3977 of 2007 Date: 6th December, 2007 Between: A.Lakshmi Devi .. Petitioner in W.P.No.3358 of 2007 K.Parvathamma .. Petitioner in W.P.No.3462 of 2007 M.Renuka .. Petitioner in W.P.No.3609 of 2007 Smt.R.Syamala .. Petitioner in W.P.No.3863 of 2007 Smt.N.Pramelamma .. Petitioner in W.P.No.3977 of 2007 And The District Collector/Chairman of the District Selection Committee of Anganwadi Workers/Helpers, Ananthapur, Ananthapur district & others. .. Respondents in all the W.Ps.