IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 5368 of 2008. Decided on 20.07. 2010. _____________________________________________________ Rajesh Kumar and others. …Petitioners. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): In sequel to order dated 29th June, 2010, the supplementary affidavit stands filed. After going through the contents of the same, Mr. Ajay Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance of the petitioners stands redressed. Consequently, the present petition has become infructuous. Disposed of as infructuous. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge July 20, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?