IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6878 of 2008 Date of decision: 29.04.2009. Mahatma Jyoti Rao Educational Enlightment Society Petitioner Versus Jitender Pal and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Arun Singhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pawan Hooda, Advocate for the respondent No.1 & 2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. At the time of motion hearing, there was an averment that the impugned order appears to lack coherence. On that averment, notice of motion was ordered to be issued for today and further proceedings were ordered to be stayed. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting respondents is not in a position to challenge the correctness of the averment at the time of motion hearing. The petition shall stand allowed. The impugned order shall stand set aside. The learned Trial Court is directed to proceed to dispose of the matter afresh by passing a self contained order in the relevant behalf. The exercise shall be completed within 15 days from the date the matter is listed for a hearing. The parties, through their learned counsel are directed to appear before the learned Trial Court on 12.5.2009. April 29, 2009 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge