IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6925 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.6925 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.6925 OF 2005 Avdhot Shreevalbh Chapekar. ... Applicant. Versus. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Shri Sandeep Kemane for the Applicant. Ms.Rajashree Gadhvi, A.P.P.for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S. OKA, J. : ABHAY S. OKA, J. : ABHAY S. OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 24th October, 2005. : 24th October, 2005. : 24th October, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P. for State. The offence alleged against the Applicant is under sections420, 465, 466, 467, 468, and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the Applicant is that he forged the signature of the learned Judge of the Family Court and has withdrawn a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- deposited in the Family Court. Investigation is not yet completed. The learned A.P.P. states that the charge-sheet will be filed approximately after two weeks. 2. Considering the gravity of offence, this is not a case where the Applicant can be enlarged on bail even before completion of the investigation. Hence no case is made out for grant of bail. The Applicant is rejected. : 2 : 2 : 2 : 3. It is obvious that after filing of the charge-sheet, the Applicant will be entitled to file fresh application before the appropriate Court. Judge. Judge. Judge.