mm ' . , ’ x_/ r @ Vxcke. Smgm SIG S r: vwarn $mgh Through The Powe! of Attorney Holder. Harbhagan bmgh Sio ahn Swam Smgh R/o \Jm Fatekchara Th9 (‘hunya Dis‘t Rainandgaon (Chhamsgarh) Versus 1. The state of Chhaztisgam. Respondents through: The Secretary. Deptt. of Revenue, Mentralaya, D. K. $. Bhavan, Raipur {CG} 2. The Sub Divisiona‘ Wéyr {Rev}, Rajnandgaon (0.6.) ‘ ‘ 3. The Naib Tehsiidar, Churiya, Distt. Rajnandgaen (9.6.). HGH “OURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BSLA$PUR W, p. No. 760 of 2W2 Petitiener I v SB: Hen'me Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. J bhn Pram!) Bnarat Advocate for the petmoner Sm: Utkafsh Vermn, Depaty Govt Adwcate f0. the reoporadents 9 R D € R (Passed on this 5t“ day of Apr“, zoo?) 1. This petition impugns the Show cause notice dated 1.4.2002 (Annexure PM) issued by the respcndent No.3 and further picceedings of the Revenue Case No. 57/2001-2002. pending befote the :espondent No.2. . ‘ 2.44m State/respondents in ite return dated 5.7.2092, in para 15. i’ submitted that "Since the Sub Divisionai Offcer has na jurisdiction unde. adh a Pradeeh Land Revenue Cod 959 and therefore the proceedmgs is dropped by hrm. but the possessten of the petitioner over the tend is iiiegat and appropriate proceeding would be initiated against him for recovery of the iand." 3. in View of the statement made by the State/respondents in its return. {earned oouneei for the petttioner submits that nothing r survives in this matter. 4. This petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. ‘ ‘ i edi- ‘ [i ' Satish Judge K. Agnihotri Thakur