IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1671 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: September 14, 2009. Raj Bala ...Petitioner(s) v. Narveer Singh ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri Mohnish Sharma, Advocate, for Shri Narender Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. ORDER Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The grievance of the petitioner in this case is that vide order dated 18.5.2009 passed in CWP No.1352 of 2009 a direction was given to the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for transfer anywhere close to Sonepat and despite the aforesaid direction, her case has not been considered so far. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Without going into the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondent to comply with the directions of this Court dated 18.5.2009 passed in CWP No.1352 of 2009, if already not complied with, within two months from the receipt of certified copy of this order. September 14, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge