CWP No. 7336 of 1991 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 7336 of 1991 Date of decision: May 5, 2011 Raj Kumar Garg ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. S.S. Dinarpur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. K.C. Bhatia, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. GURDEV SINGH, J. Heard. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order dated 17.10.1984 (Annexure P/4) was passed by the respondents, allowing the petitioner to cross the efficiency bar with effect from 1.7.1983 and in the course of proceedings that order was admitted to be correct and genuine and a statement was made on 20.4.1993 that the said order will be implemented. He also submitted that in case that order has already been implemented or the respondents implement the same, as per the statement made before the Court on 20.4.1993, the petitioner would not proceed with the present writ petition. In view of that submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, it has been submitted by the learned State counsel that in view of CWP No. 7336 of 1991 2 the statement made on 20.4.1993, order, Annexure P/4 must have been implemented and if it has not been implemented so far, the same shall be implemented within a month and the petitioner shall be granted the benefit of crossing the efficiency bar with effect from the date mentioned therein. In view of the statement made by the learned State counsel, the petitioner does not want to proceed with the present writ petition. The same is dismissed as withdrawn. The respondents shall be bound by the statement made by the learned State counsel in the Court. May 5, 2011 (GURDEV SINGH ) prem JUDGE