C. R No. 2871 of 2010 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C. R No. 2871 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : August 13, 2010 Ramsarup and another, ...... Petitioner (s) v. Smt Sunita Devi and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner states that he had only offered to make a fixed deposit of Rs.50,000/- per child to show his bona fides. If the above assertion is taken to be true, then the net result would be that as against an admitted liability of Rs.80,000/- (plus interest) and the future liability of Rs.1400/- per month, the petitioner would get away by just depositing Rs. One lac on which the monthly interest would not be more than Rs.300/- to Rs.400/- per month. This is not at all sufficient to keep the body and soul together. It was because of this reason that the deposit had been ordered to be made of Rs. 1 lac per child so that C. R No. 2871 of 2010 (O&M) ::2:: the apprehension of the petitioner that the money would be mis- appropriated by the mother would be allayed, and that the grand children would get about Rs.600/- to Rs.700/- per month so at-least their future maintenance needs would be met, in terms of the order of the trial Court. However, since counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner is unable to make a deposit of Rs.1 lac per child, this revision petition is dismissed being devoid of any merit with no order as to costs. As the main petition has since been dismissed, all the pending civil miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 13, 2010. JUDGE `kk'