IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30043 of 2010 1. BIJAY SHARMA, S/o Late Matuki Sharma 2. Ranti Devi, W/o Harihar Sharma Both R/o Vill-Belsar, P.S.-Mehandia, Dist-Arwal …Petitioners Versus THS STATE OF BIHAR ……...Opp. Party ----------- 4/ 26.03.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a criminal prosecution registered under Sections 307/341/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioners at one side and the informant on other side are close family members and some family disputes were going on between them. It is further submitted that there are case and counter case from the both sides. The present case vide Annexure I was thoroughly investigated by the Police, and after close of investigation, police submitted final report as a mistake of fact, and petitioners were not charge sheeted in that case. However, learned Magistrate has disagreed with the police report and has taken cognizance against the petitioners. 2 Hence prayer for anticipatory bail. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly in view of the fact that statutory investigating agency found the entire prosecution case to be false, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each in connection with Mehandia P.S. Case No. 53 of 2007 to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. Anjani/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)