* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BailAppl. 201/2010, Gurvinder Singh Appellant Through Mr. Anil Sharaia versus STATE Respondent Through Mr. Jaideep Malik, APP BailAppl. 2451/2009. BaldevRaj Grover Appellant Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate versus STATE Respondent Through Mr. Jaideep Malik, APP Crl. W.P. 1570/2009 BaldevRaj Grover Appellant Through Mr Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate versus • STATE Respondent ThroughMr. SanjeevBhandari,ASC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN ORDER % 17.02.2010 The petitioner Baldev Raj Grover had handed over an audio recording to the InvestigationOfficer about 2-3 weeks Signing Date:01.08.2024 16:52:56 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified ago. The transcript filed by petitioner indicates that some money was paid by Satish Chabbra to two persons namely Dubey and Gullu. Learned Addl. P.P. states that Investigating Officer will also collect the record of calls made between mobile numbers given in the transcript one of which is stated to be the mobile of Satish Chabbra and others of Sh. Rajesh Grover son of petitioner Baldev Raj Grover. He further states that the Investigation Officer will also verify the record of mobile phones ^ of the family members of the petitioner Gurvinder Singh @ Geriy and Baldev Raj Grover to ascertain whether any of those phones was used near the place of incident, at the time of offence is alleged to have been committed. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor states that the Investigating Officer who is present in the Court will record the statement of Satish Chabbra who is stated to have talked to Rajesh Grover son of the petitioner Baldev Raj Grover. Learned counsel for petitioner Baldev Raj Grover on being asked as to what made the petitioner assume that he was being sought by the police in f this case, states that one Beat Constable namely Harinder had informed him that the petitioner had been named in this case. The mobile number of Haminder is stated to be 9911338993. He further states that Harinder had called two times on two differentmobile nos. which are 9818701080 and 9999112117. The InvestigatingOfficerstates that she will examineHarinder to fmd out whetherhe had called up on these numbersand if so m what connectionand what was the conversationhe had / when he made calls on these telephones. The petitioner Baldev Raj Grover in the event of his arrest till next date of hearing, shall be released on furnishing of personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25 thousand with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the conditions that he shall join investigation at 4.p.m. tomorrow i.e. 18.02.2010 and on such other dates for which investigation Officer directs him to join (ii) He shall not try to ^ contact or interact with the complainant or any of his family V. members (iii) He shall not leave Delhi without permission of this Court and (iv) He shall deposit his passport, if any, with the Investigating Officer, forthwith. As far as petitioner Gurvinder Singh is concerned, the learned counsel for the complaint as well as Investigating Officer inform that he has been absconding and proceedings under Section 82 have been initiated against him after issuance of non-bailable warrant by the Court against him could not be executed. On being asked learned counsel for the f petitioner Gurvinder Singh states that he applied for anticipatory bail on 21.1.2010. The FIR was registered on 16.10.2009 and not only this petitioner was named in the FIR, the car of his wife was also seized on the same day. The Investigating Officer who is present in the Court states that she made a number ofattempts to contact the petitioner Gurvinder Singh but could not succeed as he was found absconding. Considering the fact that the petitioner Gurvinder Singh neither surrendered before the Investigation Officer despite being named in the FIR nor did he apply for anticipatory bail for more than three months after registration of FIR, he is not entitled to discretionary relief of anticipatory bail. It shall be open to him to surrender before the concerned court and seek regular bail. As and when the petitioner Gurvinder Singh surrenders and applies for bail, his application will be decided by the ^ concerned court by very next day. * \ Bail Application No. -2451/2010 stands disposed of. Dasti. Bail Application No. 2451/2009 and Cr. W.P. 1570/2009 be listed for further hearing on 24.05.2010. V.K. JAIN,J FEBRUARY 17, 2010