g? HISH CGURT GF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR VXRXT PETITION (S) N0. 23970f2308 PET1T1€3NER : Abhay Asthma son of Shri D.P.Asthana, aged about 49 years, presemly working as * Sub Engineer, Public Health Engineering (E / M) Divisioa, Bilaspur (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS . State of Chhattisgam, through the Chief Secretary, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. State of Madhya Pradesh, through the Chief Secretary, Gevemment of Madhya Pradesh, Govind Ballabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MR) 3. The Secretaly, Public Health Engineering Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C11) 4. The Secretary, Pubiic Healih Engineering Department, Vallahh Bhawan e Bhepal (MP) The Ehgiheer In Chief, Department of Public Heaith LA and Engineering, Raipur (CG) 6. Union of India through — Ministry of Personnel, Public Giievances and Pension Departmem of Persennel and Training, Khan Market, New Deihi. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Ran’hie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri V.Vijay, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Anuito Das, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1, 3 & 5. Shri Kashif Shakee}, Advocate for the Union of India/respondent No. 6. ORAL ORDER (I’assed on 01g day of May, 2008) With the consent of the games, the matter is taken up for hearing the matter tinaliy. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he does not want to ,press this petition on merit, except that the petitioner be permitted to make a representation to the Committee in iight of the jmignent and order dated 17m April, 2067 passed by this Court in / wwmtti B.R.Godbale Vs. Municipal Corporation Burg and others {200?(2) CGLJ 417}, i0 which learmd counsel appearing for the respondent/Sims have no objection. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in the same tarms i.e. the Committee so constituted is directed to consider the representation made by the petitioner, if his representation is not considered earlier. In the event, if it is not considered eariier, the nesh representation may be considered, as early as possible within a yeriod of four months from the date of receipt of representation. This exercise on the pait of the Government of India may be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. V/i Ki, ‘ 3d]- \ satift i t h K. Agnihotrt v. judge