IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16126 of 2009 RAJENDRA SAHANI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 26.10.2009 The case is under Section 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The two petitioners are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased. The prayer for bail was earlier rejected vide this Court’s order dated 19.12.2007 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 44348 of 2007 on the ground that the dowry death of the deceased was caused due to non- fulfillment of demand of one colour T.V and a buffalo. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main allegation was against the husband who is said to have brought the deceased for her Maika just 15 days prior to the occurrence and that thereafter, dowry death was committed. The learned counsel also submitted that the petitioner Rajendra Sahani is in custody since 31.3.2007 and petitioner no.2 Rampari Devi is in custody since 7.8.2007. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not feel inclined to reconsider the prayer for bail at this stage. Therefore, prayer is refused. However, if so advised, the petitioners may renew their prayer for bail after completion of three years of incarceration. (C.M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-