é V65 HIN GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR W.P.(S[ No. 2934 of 2008 1. Bhupal Ram Matshyapal S/o Late Sonau Ram Matshyapal aged about 50 yeaxs Oocupation— (Asst. Teacher) R/o irrigation colony Rudhri Qtr. No. A/63 Dhamtarj (C.G.) PETITIONERE x 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Thmugh the Sccmtaxy Depaltmcnt of School Education Manhalaya, D,K.S. Building, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director of Public Instructions, Rajpur 3. The Collector Dhamtari (C.G.) 4. Assistant Commissioner, Adiwasi Vikas, Adim Jati Kalyan Vibhag, Dhamtari (C.G.) 5. Distu‘ct— Education ' 0mcer, District Education Dhamtan‘ (C.G.) 6. Joint Director, Treasmy Account and Pension Raipur (C.G.) 7. The Director, Treasuxy Acoount and Pcnsion, Raipur (C.G.) Shri Amn Kochar, counsel for the peiiiionets. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocatc for the State on M BUNIL KUMAR SINHA J. Heam on admission. ORAL ORDER (04.06.2008) petitioners have passed B.Ed. examination on their own expenses, therefore, they are entitled to receive two advance incxements acoolding to circulaxs dated 24.12. 1998 and 01.03. 1999. He also submits that in many identical matters, the petitions have been allowed in terms \ / \ of the order passed in the case of Yashwant WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE ggsl227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA Aggaranc : ’ Advance copy. \ / 2 WPS 2934 2008 MU, Kumar Bharaduw Vs. Mcipaz Corpornftan, Duty and another {2006 (m mam-ca 96}. He submits that their case is squarely coveted by the said Judgnent. This legal position is not disputed by the learned counsel for the State. However, he submits that the Older may be passed in terms of the said judgnent, but it shall be subject to veriiican'on regarding peiitioners’ such quaEcation. Accotdjngly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in case of Yashwant Kumar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipal Caiporation, Dmg and another’(Supra) subject to the verihcaiion of the facts as to whether the petitioners had acquired B.Ed. Examination Certificate on their own expenses as per circulars dated 24. 12. 1998 and 01.03‘1999 and further Whether they have been paid two advance inCIements or not. The petition stands hnally disposed of. No order as to costs. 9 Sunil Kumar Sinha J Judge ‘ ”22L .ArM ,