1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.54 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.54 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.54 OF 2005 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL ST APPEAL ST APPEAL ST.NO.12748 OF 2004 NO.12748 OF 2004 NO.12748 OF 2004 Shankar Pandurang Jadhav & Ors. ...Applicant Vs. Vishwanath Moreshwar @ Datta Mahabaleshwarkar ...Respondent Mr.Tejesh Dande for the Applicant. Mr.V.A.Shastry for the Respondent CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: JANUARY 14, 2005. JANUARY 14, 2005. JANUARY 14, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. This application for condonation of delay is strongly opposed by the learned Counsel for the Respondent. I have perused the Affidavit-in-reply filed by the Respondent. 2. Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Accordingly, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Judge. Judge. Judge.