IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 383 of 2008 (S/S) WITH Stay Application No. 3009 of 2008 Smt. Manorama Devi W/o Shri Raghunath Singh R/o Village Sakani Badi P.O. Nauthana Patti Maniyarsyon, Pauri Garhwal. .................. Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary Mahila Sashaktikaran Evam Bal Vikas Vibhag, Dehradun. 2. Director Integrated Child Development Services 24, Shastri Nagar, Haridwar Road Dehradun. 3. District Magistrate, parui Garhwal. 4. Bal Vikas Pariyojana Adhikari Pao, Pauri Garhwal. 5. Smt. Pushpa, W/o Sri Uttam Singh R/o Village Sakani Badi P.O. Nauthana, Patti Maniyarsyon Pauri Garhwal. ........................ Respondents Shri Dinesh Gahatori, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents No. 1 to 4. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 12.03.2008, whereby the appointment of the petitioner Aganabri Karyakatri, is canceled. Consequential order dated 19.03.2008, passed by respondent No. 4 is also challenged. 3. From the perusal of impugned order, it is evident that after enquiry got done through sub- Divisional Magistrate, it was found that the petitioner does not belong to Below Poverty Line category, as land in the name of her husband is valued at Rs. 3,34,875.00, apart for the ancestral house in Srinagar. It is further mentioned in the impugned order that petitioner’s husband is a Contractor. It is further submitted that petitioner does not belong to BPL category. It appears that after the appointment of petitioner some complaint was made that petitioner does not belong to Below Poverty Line category and she obtained the appointment letter without satisfying said condition. 4. Since the impugned order is passed on the enquiry report, given by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, this Court does not find any error committed by District Magistrate in cancelling the appointment of the petitioner as Aganbari Karyakarti. 5. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. (Stay application No. 3009 of 2008, also stands dismissed). (Prafulla. C. Pant, J.) Dt. 23.05.2008 Sweta