IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI MONDAY, THE 3RD JANUARY 2011 / 13TH POUSHA 1932 RP.No. 1138 of 2010() --------------------- ( AGAINST THE ORDER IN C.R.P.NO.411/2008) REVIEW PETITIONER/2ND RESPONDENT IN C.R.P. ---------------------- CHANDRABOSE, S/O.KUTTAN RESIDING AT VALLOTTUTHARA HOUSE VADAKKUMPURAMKARA, CHENNAMANGALAM VILLAGE PARAVOOR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 IN THE CRP --------------- 1. KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER V.I.P.ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI-17. 2. RAJESH, S/O.CHANDRASSERIL SUSHEELAN RESIDING AT MOOTHAKUNNAM VILLAGE PARAVOOR TALUK. 3. ABDUL SATHAR HAJI MOOSA SAITH DHARMASTHAPANAM, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING TRUSTEE, ADAM ABOOBACKER SAITH PULLEPPADU, CHITTTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM. BY SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.KRISHNANUNNI FOR R1 SRI.A.A.ABDUL HASSAN FOR R1 SRI.ELVIN PETER FOR R2 SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ FOR R3 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/01/2011,ALONG WITH RP NO. 1152 OF 2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: A.K.BASHEER & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.No.1138 OF 2010 IN C.R.P.No.411 OF 2008 & R.P.No.1152 OF 2010 IN C.R.P.No.481 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 3rd day of January, 2011 ORDER Basheer, J. R.P.No.1138/2010 : Sri.Jamsheed Hafiz accepts notice for respondent No.1. Sri.Elvin Peter accepts notice for respondent No.2. Sri.T.H.Abdul Azeez accepts notice for respondent No.3. 2. R.P.No.1152/2010: Sri.Varghese Kuriakose accepts notice for respondent No.1. Sri.M.Gopikrishnan Nambiar accepts notice for respondent No.2. Sri.Jamsheed Hafiz accepts notice for respondent No.3. Sri.T.H.Abdul Azeez accepts notice for respondent No.4. 3. The common prayer in these two review petitions is to review the common order passed by us in C.R.P.Nos.481/2008 and 411/2008. According to the learned counsel, the decision in Ramesh Gobindram v. Sugra Humayun Mirza Wakf ( 2010 (3) KLT 862 (SC) R.P.Nos.1138/2010 & 1152/2010 2 has been subsequently explained by another Bench of the Apex court in a later decision in Board of Wakf v. Anis Fatma Begum ( 2010(4) KLT 765(SC). It is submitted by the learned counsel that in view of the apparent shift in the legal pronouncement as laid down in the latter decision, the common order passed by this court is liable to be reviewed and reconsidered. Therefore, the review petitions are allowed. Post the C.R.Ps. for hearing. A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE sv. R.P.Nos.1138/2010 & 1152/2010 2