IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27768 of 2009 SONE LAL RAI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 03-11-2009 Heard. Leave is sought to withdraw the prayer for bail on behalf of petitioner no.1, Sone Lal Rai. Permission is accorded. The prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner no.1 is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Considering that the husband is still absconding in a complaint case under sections 498(A)/379 of the Penal Code and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act with common allegations, this Court is not persuaded to consider the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner no.2. The application is rejected. If the husband of the alleged victim subject to himself to law, if so advised, petitioner no.2 may prefer his prayer for anticipatory bail before the court below afresh. ( Navin Sinha, J ) BTiwary/