IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7871 of 2006. Inder Chand son of Shri Bhagwan Sahay & Others VERSUS Madan son of Shri Nihal Dev and Others Date Of Order ::: 21/05/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Mr. Anoop Dhand, Counsel for the Petitioners By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the parties. Plaintiff/petitioners instituted a suit for partition and permanent injunction against the defendant/respondents in respect of disputed property, along with the application for temporary injunction. The trial Court allowed the application for temporary injunction vide order dated 14.07.1988 and restrained the defendants from alienating the property, in dispute and, not to raise any construction thereon. The plaintiffs thereafter moved an application uder Order 39 Rule 2-A, C.P.C. contending therein that the injunction order has been violated by the defendants, therefore, they may be punished for the disobedience of the order passed by the trial Court. A notice on the application was issued to the opposite- party, wherein the contents of the application were denied. Both the parties led their evidence in support of their respective contentions. The trial Court vide its order dated 02.01.2004 recorded a finding that the defendants have not disobeyed or violated the injunction order passed in the matter and, consequently dismissed the application under Order 39 Rule 2-A, C.P.C. Being aggrieved with the same, an appeal was preferred by the plaintiffs, but the same was also dismissed by the Appellate Court vide order dated 14.09.2006. The above two orders have been challenged by the plaintiffs in the present writ petition. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and, after considering his submissions in the light of findings recorded by both the Courts below, I find that the question of disobedience of the order of trial Court has been examined by the trial Court and also by the Appellate Court and, both the Courts below have recorded a concurrent finding that the injunction order has not been violated by the defendants. I do not find any illegality in the findings recorded by both the Courts below. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/