2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2400/2010 & Crl.M.A. No.12836/2010 DEE PAK MITHAL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through : Mr. Dalip K. Rana and versus STATE & ANR Mr. Manish Gandhi, Advs. with petitioners in person. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for State. CORAM: Insp. B.D. Sharma, PS Ranjit Nagar. Mr. R.P. Sharma, Adv. for R-2 with R-2/complainant in person. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI ORDER O/o 13.08.2010 l. The present petition is filed by the petitioners under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. pray111g inter alia for quashing of FIR No.95/2010, lodged by the respondent No.2/complainant against the petitioners under Sections 323/448/506/34/452/380/386 IPC read with Section 27 /54/59 of the Arms Act registered with PS Ranjit Nagar, New Delhi and all proceedings arising out therefrom. CRL.M.C. 2400/2010 Page 1of4 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 2. It is the case of the parties that the respondent No.2/ complainant is the owner of the premises bearing No.15/15, East Patel Nagar, Delhi and the petitioners are tenants in respect of a part of ground floor and the first floor of the premises, for the last about 18 to 20 years. On 23.5.2010, a dispute arose between the parties, in the course of which, the respondent No.2/complainant stated that he was threatened by the petitioners, which resulted in lodging of the aforesaid complainant. 3. While the police was investigating the matter, the petitioners . .t applied for anticipatory bail before the learned ASJ. In the course of hearing of the bail application, the learned ASJ directed the parties to approach the Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, for exploring the possibility of arriving at a settlement. As a result, the parties appeared before the Mediation Centre and arrived at a settlement, as recorded in the order dated 1.7.2010 (Page 21 to 33). 4. In terms of the aforesaid settlement arrived at between the parties, it was agreed that the petitioners would vacate the suit ' premises and handover the keys thereof, in the civil proceedings initiated by the petitioners against the respondent No.2/complainant and pending before the court of learned Civil Judge, Tis Hazari Courts. CRL.M.C. 2400/2010 Page 2 of 4 It was further agreed that the outstanding rent and electricity dues in respect of the suit premises till 30.6.2010, would be paid by the petitioners to the respondent No.2/complainant. 5. The respondent No.2/complainant, who is present in the Court, confirms receipt of the arrears of rent and electricity dues upto 30.6.2010 and confirms that the keys of the suit premises have been deposited by the petitioners in the court of learned Civil Judge, Tis Hazari Courts and that no further disputes are now pending between the parties. 6. Pertinently, the aforesaid settlement was duly taken note of by the learned ASJ in the order dated 14. 7 .2010 (page 25) as also by the learned Civil Judge in the order dated 7.7.2010 (page 24). 7. It is now submitted by the parties jointly that there are no further disputes between them and the respondent No.2/complainant states that he has no objection to the aforesaid FIR being quashed. 8. Learned APP for the State, on instruction from the IO, confirms the fact that the parties have arrived at a settlement. He, therefore; does not oppose the prayer made in the present petition. 9. This Court has heard counsels for the parties. In view of the submission made by the respondent No.2/complainant and in view of the fact that the parties have arrived at a settlement of their own free CRL.M.C. 2400/2010 Page 3 of 4 will and volition and without any undue influence or coercion from any quarters, no useful purpose will be served by proceeding further with the aforesaid FIR and the proceedings arising out therefrom. 10. Accordingly, the prayer made in the petition is allowed and FIR No.95/2010 lodged by the respondent No.2/complainant with PS Ranjit Nagar, Delhi and all proceedings arising out therefrom stand quashed. 11. The petition is disposed of along with the pending application. File be consigned to the record room. AUGUST 13, 2010 sk CRL.M.C. 2400/2010 HIMA KOHLI,] Page 4 of 4 I <'.)