PETITIONER/: (Plaintiff) HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Writ Petition (Art. 2271 No.1586 of 2010 Girdhar Jaiswal, S/o Purushottam Jaiswal, aged about 25 years, R/o Manendragarh, P.S. and Tahsil Manendragarh, Distt. Korea (C.G.) RESPONDENTS/: (Defendants) Versus State of Chhattisgarh Collector Korea (C.G.) Through the 2. 3. Girija Sharan Jaiswal, S/o Badri Prasad, R/o Manendragarh, Near Sai Baba Triangle, Distt. Korea (C.G.) Mohd. Hanif, S/o Mohd. Habib, aged about 62 years, R/o Jhagrakhad Road Manendragarh, P.S. and Tahsil Manendragarh, Distt. Korea (C.G.) (Applicant) {Writ petition underArticle 227 ofthe Constitution of India} Present: Mr. Shakti Raj Sinha, counsel for the petitioner. Miss Sangeeta Mishra, Panel Lawyerforthe State/respondent No.1. None present for respondent No.2. Mr. Adil Minhaj, counsel for respondent No.3. Soma Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J ORDER (1-11-2011) 1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged legality and propriety ofthe order dated 19-3-2010 passed by the Civil Judge Class-11, Manendragarh, in Civil Suit No.55-A/ 2009, whereby the application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC on behalf of respondent No.3 herein has been allowed. 2. As per para 2 of the plaint, the petitioner herein is in possession of plot No. 139 and as per reply to the application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC, respondent No.3 herein has constructed some chabutara upon one part of plot No.139. Considering the aforesaid pleading and admission of the petitioner herein, the trial Court has rightly allowed the application. 1 do not find any illegality in the order impugned requiring any interference in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction. The petition is, therefore, liableto be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. 3. Consequently, I.A.Nos.1 & 2 stand disposed of. TR Sharma Judge