-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7033 OF 2005 IN CRI.W.P.NO.658 OF 2005 Sou.Preeti Eknath Khandale and Or. ..Applicants Vs. Shri.Eknath Keshav Kandale & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Samir Tambekar i/b S.D.Patil Advocate for Applicants Mr.Shekhar Ingawale for Respondent no.1 Mr.U.V.Nikam A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : OCTOBER 27, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 27, 2005 DATE : OCTOBER 27, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants, learned advocate for the respondent no.1-complainant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking quashing of complaint bearing RCC No. 49 of 2004 which is pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate F.C. -2- Pune. The respondent no.1 i.e. original complainant has filed affidavit wherein it is stated that the dispute has been amicably settled between the parties and he has no objection if the prayer of the applicants is allowed. In view of the fact that the matter has been settled between the parties, the learned A.P.P. has no objection to the prayer being granted. In this view of the matter, this application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and is disposed of. 2. Authenticated copy be issued to the parties. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]