1 COURT OF CHHATTCSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (S) No. 2976 pf 2(»IZ (1) Paras Ram Soni, Aged 39 years, S/o. Let. Shri Lakhan Lal Soni, Upper Dwision Teacher, Chandra-Shekher Azad Hlgher Secondary Schoo! Durg VERSUS : 1. The State GoTOrnment of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Ralpur 2. Municipal Corporatton, Durg, Through Commbsioner Municipal Corporation Durg IVRIT PETTriON UNDER ARTECXE 226 OF THE HON'BLE 3USTICE SHRI SATISH K. ASNIHOTRI Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr, Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (Passed on lllh day of Nay, 2007) 1. Leamed counse! appearing for the petittoner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact and questton of !aw inwlved in the praent writ petitton are the same to that of in Yashurant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. MunScipal Coiporation, Durg and another {2006 (II) MP3R-C®9S}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. Accordingly, the wrlt petition b allowed In terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwraj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Duig and another (Supra), subject to verificaiion of the fact as to whether the petittoner has acqulred B.Ed. Examination Certiflcate on hts own e;q>enses as per the circulais dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and fuither whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as tq coste,..,,^-—- - Sd/- Satish KAgnibotn Judge 2.