IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2009 / 12TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 15073 of 2009(D) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- AKSHAY VENKITASUBRAMANIAN, S/O.N.V.VENKITESWARAN, AGED 21 YEARS, RESIDING AT 5A.16, STATE BANK OF INDIA STAFF QUARTERS, RAHEJA TOWNSHIP, MALAD EAST, MUMBAI-93. BY ADVS. SMT.LATHA PRABHAKARAN, SRI.K.M.JAMALUDHEEN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, COCHIN UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, KALAMASSERY, KOCHI-682 022, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, COCHIN UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, KALAMASSERY, KOCHI-682 022. R1 & R2 BY ADV.SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI, SC, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: an. V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.15073 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 2nd June,2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner, who has completed his Engineering Degree Course from a college affiliated to the Cochin University of Science and Technology , had written the 7th Semester Examination held in November, 2008. Apparently, dissatisfied by the marks obtained in one paper, he had applied for revaluation. He is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the Examination held in November, 2008. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioner in relation to the 7th Semester Examination held in November, 2008, as W.P ( C) No.15073 of 2009 2 early as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.15073 of 2009 3 W.P ( C) No.15073 of 2009 4 (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.15073 of 2009 5 W.P ( C) No.15073 of 2009 6 (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.15073 of 2009 7 W.P ( C) No.15073 of 2009 8