1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 795 of 2011 with Stay Application No. 9673 of 2011 Rashmi D/o Kishore Thapa R/o P.S.Doiwala District Dehradun …………… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Uttarakhand, through Home Secretary, Secretariat , Dehradun 2. Senior Superintendent of Police District Hardwar 3. Station House Officer, Police Station Laksar District Hardwar 4. Mange Ram S/o Shukbir Singh R/o Village Tanda Jwalapur Bramanwala P.S.Khanpur, District Hardwar …………..Respondents. Shri B.B.Sharma, Advocate present for the petitioner Shri S.S.Adhikari,A.G.A, present for the State. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2 (2) By means of this writ petition moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought quashing of the First Information Report registered as Crime No. 115 of 2011, (F.I.R. No. 96 of 2011), relating to offences punishable under section 420, 323 and 506 I.P.C., police station Laksar, District Hardwar. (3) Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is married daughter of Madhu Thapa, and she has been falsely implicated in the case. (4) However, perusal of the First Information Report shows that there are serious allegations of cheating against the Madhu Thapa, and her daughter (petitioner), who duped the complainant of more than ` one lakh by promising him a job. (5) Factual pleas of defence have been raised in the writ petition which are matter of investigation. As far as, not filing charge sheet within a period of sixty days or ninety days is concerned that is no ground for quashing of the First Information Report. (6) For the reasons as discussed above, this writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation 3 that if the petitioner Rashmi surrenders before the court concerned, her bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (Stay Application No. 9673 of 2011 also stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt.15.09.2011 NP