IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 141 OF 2005 Kumar Akshay Kumar Anil Thikane .. Applicant vs. Shri Anil Bhupal Thikane and anr. .. Respondents Mr. Sudhakar G. Thorat and Mr. J.P. Kharge for applicant. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : October 17, 2005. Date : October 17, 2005. Date : October 17, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . In M.A.C. No.102 of 2004 an application came to be filed after the claim petition was decided and the applicant who is the son of the deceased prayed to the Tribunal for withdrawal of 70% of the claim amount which was directed to be deposited in a Nationalised Bank by the Tribunal. By the impugned order dated 1/8/2005 said application has been rejected. The said order cannot be challenged by way of a Civil Revision Application, more so when the impugned order has been passed in an application which was filed in a claim petition already decided. The learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the CRA. . Leave is granted and the CRA is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as is available in law. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)