IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5899 of 2000 Between: Md. Nayeemuddin S/o. Aleemuddin, R/o. Narketpally, Nalgonda District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of A.P. Rep. by its Secretary to the Government of A.P. (Labour Department). Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 3 The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Narketpally Depot, Nalgonda District. 4 The Chief Inspector (Enquiries) O/o the Regional Manager, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents removing the petitioner from his services as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and contrary to the law as the APSRTC CCA Regulations, 1967 do not enjoy statutory force and the proceedings issued by the 3rd Respondent in proceedings No. Typist/95(17)/99-NKP dt.2-3-2000 is liable to be set aside and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to reinstate the petitioner with all consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.S.A.K.MYNUDDIN Counsel for the Respondents : SMT.B.G.UMA DEVI The Court made the following : ORDER : Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that the subject matter of this writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 16th February 2009. ajr