IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 854 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 5.8.2010 Smt. Sarla Kajal ......petitioner vs. Sh. S. S. Bawalia, Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ......respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Varun Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Khandelwal, Advocate for Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Advocate for respondent. HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) CM No. 19056-CII of 2010 Application is allowed. Reply filed on behalf of respondent is taken on record. COCP No. 854 of 2010 The grievance of the petitioner in the present contempt petition is that the order passed by this Court on 19.8.2009, in respect of representation submitted by the petitioner for non-payment provident fund, has not been considered . This Court had directed the respondent to decide such representation. In the reply filed, it has been pointed out that an order has been passed by the assessing authority under Section 7-A of Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and an amount of Rs. 27,549/- has been credited to the account of the petitioner on 3.6.2010. The scheme certificate has also been issued to the petitioner on 7.6.2010. In view of the said fact, no further orders are called for in the present contempt petition. Consequently, the same is disposed of as having been rendered infrucutuous. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 9.8.2010 preeti