IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13432 of 2011 DEEPAK KUMAR @ DIPAK SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of enticing away the niece of the informant. The F.I.R. suggests that the occurrence took place on 26.01.2011 in the night whereas, the victim, in her 164 Cr.P.C. statement, stated that the occurrence took place on 25.01.2011 and the F.I.R. was registered on 27.01.2011. It appears that the victim girl filed a petition before the learned court below on 03.02.2011 to the effect that she was not being abducted whereas, in her 164 Cr.P.C. statement, she named the petitioner and others to have been taken by force but does not allege any misbehaviour nor does suggest the purpose of taking away. 2 Considering the fact that 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the victim girl does not inspire confidence, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Kumarkhand P.S. Case No. 13/2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)