o (l')— ^ Slngle BenllK IN THE HIGH COURT_OF^HHATTLSGARHAT BILASPUR (C.G1 W.P.ISINO. <^(/^^ /2009 PETITIONER 4 ^s>-^'^ cSy' ,''' ,.'!?-•'" oV; s Ib^ ^J^ s "^'^ .^"" !»•- RESPONDBNTS ./•' /•' ^^aj Kumar Chandravanshi aged about 65 years, S/o Shri Dakor Singh Chandravanshi, Retired Block Education Officer, Lohara, Distt. Kawardha, R/o Village Kucthari Mohalla, Near Hanuman Mandir Kawardha Distt. Kawardha (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. ^State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Edycation Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. 3. District Education Officer, Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) The collector Kabirdham, Kawardha (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA '^. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5422 of 2009 Petitioner Raj Kuinar Chaiidravaashi Versus Respondents State of Chliattisgarh & ofhers (Writ Petition uaderArdcle 226 offhe Constitution oflndiaj (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shri D. N. Prajapati, AdvocatE for the petitioner. Ms Snuta Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the respondents. // ORDERtorall ( Passed on this 22nd day ofSeptember, 2009) Heard. Leamed counsel appearillg for the petitioner, on iastructioiis, subinits fhat the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to wifhdraw this writ petition, with Uberty to inake a representation to the concerued aufhority for consideration of his case in the light of fhe judgiueat aad order passed by fhe Hon'ble Supreme Court ia State of Tripura and others Vs. K. K. Roy1. Leamed counsel appeanng for the respondents have no objection. In view of the foregoiug the writ petitiou is disniissed as withdrawn, wifh fhe above-stated Uberty. No order asto costs. Thalair Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ' AIR 2004 SC 1249