1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 539 OF 2009 TATA Captial Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Narendra M. Sakharkar & Anr. ...Respondents. ..... Mr.Nikhil Mehta i/by KMC Legal Venture for the Petitioner. Ms.Shaila R. Pandey for respondent nos. 1 & 2. ..... CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 2nd December, 2009. P.C.- 1. Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 petition, the parties are settled the matter and accordingly filed consent terms which is marked ‘X’, signed by both the parties as well as their respective advocates. There is no dispute about signatures, authorization and identification of any kind. The statement is made that it is within the framework of law and record. The present petition is accordingly disposed of in view of this consent terms. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)