IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15376 of 2011 Md. Muslim, S/O Najir Miyan, R/O Village-Labawar, P.S.- Kothi, District- Gaya. . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Gaya. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sherghati, Gaya. 4. The Block Development Officer, Imamganj, Gaya . 5. The Panchayat Secretary, Labawar Gram Panchayat, Imamganj, District- Gaya. 6. The Mukhiya, Labawar Gram Panchayat, Imamganj, Gaya. . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 28.09.2011 The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer within Imamganj Block in the district of Gaya, prays for quashing the undated notice contained in Annexure-1, whereby he has been directed to refund Rs.2,23,310/- and Rs. 166,797/- towards the value of undistributed rice to the tune of 163 quintals under SGRY Scheme and 121.75 quintals of rice under Food for Work scheme at the APL rate of Rs.13.70 per kg. The petitioner asserts that he did not lift any quantity of rice under SGRY Scheme. He further submits that he lifted only 249.25 quintals of rice under Food for Work Scheme and distributed 168 quintals of rice against the valid permits. He submits that only 81.25 quintals of rice would remain in his stock. Counsel for the State submits that the submission of the petitioner is subject to verification. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as 2 mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would either deposit 25% of the value of undistributed rice to the tune of 81.25 quintals at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within six weeks. The representation of the petitioner would be disposed of within 10 weeks thereafter. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)