WP(C) 79/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I A ANSARI HION’BLE MR JUSTICE A K GOSWAMI Heard Mr. A. K. Bhattacharjee, learned Senior counsel, appearing on behalf of th e petitioner, and Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Standing counsel, Department of Health, Government of Assam, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None has a ppeared on behalf of the remaining respondents. By filing this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has put to challenge the constitutional validity of Rule 6 (iii) of the Assam Medical Colleges (Regulation of Admission to Post Graduate Courses) Rules, 2006. During pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner was, following the directions given by this Court in this writ petition, allowed to appear in the entrance examinations though the petitioner, not having completed MBBS course from Medical College in Assam, was not, under the impugned rules, el igible to appear in the entrance examinations. In the entrance examinations afor ementioned, the petitioner could not qualify. Situated thus, it is submitted, on behalf of the petitioner, that the pe titioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty granted to him to cha llenge the constitutional validity of Rule 6 (iii) aforementioned. To the submi ssions, so made, no objection has been raised on behalf of the respondents. Considering the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, w e dispose of this writ petition, as withdrawn by the petitioner, with liberty gr anted to the petitioner to challenge, in future, if so advised, the constitution al validity of Rule 6 (iii) of the Assam Medical Colleges (Regulation of Admissi on to Post Graduate Courses) Rules, 2006.