IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18761 of 2011 Sheo Narayan Singh & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 29.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the D.P. Act. It is alleged that the petitioner No. 2’ father took Rs. 1,50,000/- from the complainant and then fixed date for engagement and marriage but subsequently further demand of Rs. 1,50,000/- was made but on non fulfillment of the same the marriage was not solemnized. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that accusation of payment of Rs. 1,50,000/- appears unreasonable since it is admitted by the complainant in paragraph no.4 of the complaint that payment was given prior to engagement at the house of the complainant. It is further submitted that thrust of accusation is against petitioner 2 no.1 and not the petitioner no. 2, let the petitioners, Sheo Narayan Singh and Ram Sagar Singh, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 771 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Bikramganj, Rohtas, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)