IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2010 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 4917 of 2007(I) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------- AJAYAKUMAR.G., AGED 31 YEARS, S/O. GOPINATHAN PILLAI, MANASI, KANNIMEL, KILIKOLLOOR P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE THOMAS. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE LAW SECRETARY, THE LAW (INSPECTION WING)DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY SPL. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.B. HOOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.4917/2007-I: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE LIST PUBLISHED BY THE R.2. DTD. 22/06/06. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE CONSOLIDATED LIST OF ALL THE 133 POSTS OF DGP'S/PP'S EXISTING IN VARIOUS COURTS. EXT.P.3.A: COPY OF THE G.O.(M.S).NO.481/06/LAW DTD. 03/11/2006. EXT.P.3.B: COPY OF THE G.O.(M.S).NO.482/06/LAW DTD. 03/11/2006. EXT.P.3.C: COPY OF THE G.O.(MS).NO.486/06/LAW DTD. 10/11/2006. EXT.P.3.D: COPY OF THE G.O.(M.S).NO.487/06/LAW DTD. 10/11/2006. EXT.P.3.E: COPY OF THE G.O.(M.S).NO.488/06/LAW DTD. 09/11/2006. EXT.P.3.F: COPY OF THE G.O.(M.S) NO.489/06/LAW DTD. 10/11/2006. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No. 4917 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T This writ petition was admitted on 13.02.2007. The Government Pleader took notice for the 1st respondent. But the petitioner did not pay process for taking out notice to the other respondents. Therefore the matter was posted before the Registrar (Judicial) for defects on 06.12.2010. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. That is why the writ petition has been posted in the 'defects' list of this court today. Today when the matter was taken up there is no appearance for the petitioner. The learned Government Pleader submits that, the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered against the petitioner by the decision in Joshy Nambudakam v. State of Kerala [2007 (3) KLT 714]. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/