IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39799 of 2009 NAGINA SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 22.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Considering the recital in the impugned order of rejection under section 47(a) of the Excise Act that the petitioner fled the moment the raiding party came, this Court does not persuade to grant him privilege of anticipatory bail on the submission that nothing was recovered from his possession. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered on its own merits, without being prejudiced by the present order. Shageer (Navin Sinha, J)