IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.365 OF 2006 IN APPEAL (LDG.) 1217 NO.OF 2005 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.469 OF 2003 IN AWARD NO.172 OF 1999 Tripat C. Oberoi ....Applicant V/s. The Mumbai Corpn.of Gr.Mumbai & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.P.S. Prakashan, representative of the Applicant present. Mr.Gaikwad for the Respondents. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 18TH MARCH, 2006. P.C. : 1. Heard the Applicant and the learned counsel for the Respondents. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bona-fide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)