WP(C) 2596/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY It appears that the impugned order passed on 12.4.2010 (Annexure-IX) by the Airp ort Controller, A.A.I, Dibrugarh Airport has already been cancelled by the subse quent order passed on 27.4.2010 (Annexure-X) by the same authority. The counter affidavit filed by the respondent No.2 discloses that the Ai rport Controller (respondent No.3) had issued various orders, contrary to the di rections given by the higher authority, to make available undeserved advantage t o the petitioner/contractor. From the averments it can be gathered that the work was awarded to the petitioner at a highly inflated rate of Rs.19,000,00/- where as the estimated value of the work is only Rs.9,45,000/-. Because of this anomal y and to protect public interest, the Airport Authority of India decided to go for a fresh tender process with the corrected estimate. The record disclosed tha t a disciplinary proceeding has been initiating against S.K. Mallick, Airport Co ntroller, Dibrugarh Airport (respondent No.3) for violating specific instruction s of the management. Having regard to the above position revealed through the counter affidav it and in view of the fact that the impugned order dated 12.4.2010 has already b een cancelled by the subsequent communication dated 27.4.2010, I do not find any justification to keep this writ petition pending in Court. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of and the interim order stand s recalled.