CR No.3686 of 2011 (O&M) - 1 - CR No.3776 of 2011 (O&M) CR No.3777 of 2011 (O&M) CR No.3894 of 2011 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CR No.3686 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.06.2011 Sukhwinder Singh . . .Petitioner Versus Swetamber Sthanik Wasi Jain Sabha (Regd.), Faridkot . . . Respondent ***** CR No.3776 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.06.2011 Sandeep Kumar . . .Petitioner Versus Swetamber Sthanik Wasi Jain Sabha (Regd.), Faridkot . . . Respondent ***** CR No.3777 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.06.2011 Raj Kumar . . .Petitioner Versus Swetamber Sthanik Wasi Jain Sabha (Regd.), Faridkot . . . Respondent CR No.3894 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.06.2011 Veer Bhan . . .Petitioner Versus Swetamber Sthanik Wasi Jain Sabha (Regd.), Faridkot . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** CR No.3686 of 2011 (O&M) - 2 - CR No.3776 of 2011 (O&M) CR No.3777 of 2011 (O&M) CR No.3894 of 2011 (O&M) Present: Mr.S.C. Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) These are four revision petitions which are being disposed of by this common order. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the revision petition on merits rather he has prayed for six months time to vacate the demised premises. He has submitted that the petitioners are in possession of the demised premises since long and would require some time to find out alternate accommodation. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, revision petitions are dismissed on merits. However, he is granted six months time to vacate the demised premises. Petitioners are directed to handover the vacant possession to the landlord on or before 02.11.2011 and shall file an undertaking to the Rent Controller, Faridkot within 30 days from today and also clear all the arrears of rent, if any due. The petitioner shall also keep on paying the rent of the ensuing months. It is made clear that in case of any violation of the undertaking, the petitioner shall be liable under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUNE 03, 2011 JUDGE Vivek