IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11366 of 2010 1. PARMILA KUMARI W/O SRI MAKHAN LAL SAH R/O VILL SANHA PURAB, P.S.SAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTT-BEGUSARAI—-PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY & ADULT EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BEGUSARAI 4. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION BEGUSARAI 5. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER BALIA, DISTT- BEGUSARAI 6. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTT- BEGUSARAI 7. BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER SAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTT- BEGUSARAI 8. MUKHIA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ SANHA PURAB, P.S. SAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTT-BEGUSARAI 9. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ SANHA PURAB, P.S.SAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTT-BEGUSARAI 10. DISTRICT TEACHERS EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY, THROUGH ITS MEMBER DISTT-BEGUSARAI 11. SMITA W/O SRI AMRESH CHAURASIA R/O VILL SANHA PURAB, P.S.SAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTT-BEGUSARAI--RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 16.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The appellate tribunal has dismissed the appeal of the petitioner primarily on two grounds, one, that no grievance was raised by the petitioner before the authority within the time frame fixed under the relevant rule at the relevant time and other aspect that even if the claim of the petitioner is accepted to be true, no direction can be given for appointment of the petitioner on the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra as the said post does not exist after 1.7.2006. Both the reasons are cogent reasons for refusal of the prayer of the petitioner. This writ application has no merit and it is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)