IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2010 / 21ST PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 32116 of 2009(O) -------------------------- IA.1771/2009 AND 1789/2009 IN I.P. 4/2009 OF SUB COURT, ALAPPUZHA .................... PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. FAOUZEE BEGOM, CHAITRAM, KERALADITYAPURAM, POWODIKONAM P.O., TRIVANDRUM. 2. A. MANZAR, THENGUVILA VEEDU, CHIRAYINKAL, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.A.KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. MUHAMMED RAFEEK, PROPRIETOR, SILVER STAR CABLE CORPORATION, COLLECTORATE JN., ALAPPUZHA. 2. SEVEN STAR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD., REHANA BUILDING, SOUTH OF COLLECTORATE JN., ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, AZIZ MUHAMMED, S/O.ABID ALI, MANAGER OPERATIONS. 3. INDUSLND MEDIA & COMMUNICATIONS LTD., 49/50, MIDC INDUSTRIAL AREA, IN CENTRE, 12TH ROAD, ANDHERI (WEST), MUMBAI, PIN.400 091, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SANJEEV AHUJA, HEAD-LEGAL, INDUSLND MEDIA & COMMUNICATIONS LTD. R2 & R3 BY ADV. MR.SATHISH NINAN, MR.SANTHOSH MATHEW, MR.ARUN THOMAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. P. BHAVADASAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C). No. 32116 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 12th day of March, 2010. JUDGMENT In this writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners assail Ext.P8 order, by which the impleading petition was allowed by the court below. 2.Petitioners filed I.P. before Sub Court, Alappuzha as I.P. No.4 of 2009. Copy of the petition and the interlocutory application so filed are produced as Exts.P1 and P2. It is stated that second and third respondents filed impleading petitions, which are produced as Exts.P4 and P5. They also filed a petition to review the order passed appointing the receiver. The impleading petitions were strongly opposed by the petitioners. The grievance of the petitioners is that without considering their objections, the impleading petitions were allowed. The said order is assailed in this petition. WPC.32116/2009. 2 3. On going through the order of the court below, it is seen that the court below has considered the objections of the petitioners in detail and has come to the conclusion that the persons who were sought to be impleaded in the matter have a right to be heard. It is also pointed out that respondents 2 and 3 have produced certain documents, which would show that they have interest in the proceedings. Details regarding the interest of respondents 2 and 3 are available in the impugned order. It is unnecessary to reiterate them. There is nothing to show that the court below has exercised its jurisdiction erroneously so as to warrant interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. There is no merit in this writ petition. Accordingly it is dismissed. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sb.