IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-10967 of 2009 Date of Decision: February 02, 2010 Pankaj & Others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & Another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the present petition was filed for quashing FIR on the basis of compromise. Learned counsel has pointed out that the petitioners concluded that issues had been settled in view of compromise on account of statement given by the complainant before the Family Court. The compromise, however, is not being respected by the complainant. Crl. Misc. No. M-10967 of 2009 [2] Learned counsel wants to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioners to file a petition for quashing afresh. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (AJAI LAMBA) February 02, 2010 JUDGE avin