((-1-)) ms t IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.53 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.75 OF 2008 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.53 OF 2008 Mrs.Leena Stephen Francis D’mello Appellant versus Stephen Francis Anthony D’mello Respondent Ms.Manjula Rao and Pradip Chavan for applicant. Shri R.T.Lalwani for respondent. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI AND SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATE : 22nd April 2008 PC : 1. Learned counsel for the parties state that the appellant and the respondent have amicably settled all their disputes and they wish to file consent terms in the Court. The appellant and the respondent are present in the Court. They confirm that they have settled all their disputes and they wish to file consent terms. They have tendered in the Court today consent terms duly signed by the appellant and the respondent and their respective advocates. Consent Terms taken on record and marked "X". ((-2-)) Undertakings contained in the consent terms are accepted by this Court. Order in terms of the Consent Terms. 2. Since the appellant was Hindu and the respondent was Christian at the time of marriage, in terms of clause (1) of the Consent Terms, their marriage is declared null and void. The appellant and the respondent got married on 28nd June 2001 in Church at Dubai. That marriage is also dissolved by Consent by converting prayer (b) of the Petition No.A-932/2007 into one by mutual consent under section 10-A of the Divorce Act, 1869. 3. The Family Court appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Needless to say that all Civil Applications stand disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE