1"), ^.:'.i(iiSfc''-^^ HIGH COURT O? CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 N0. 3791 of2007 Petitioners 1. 2. 3. 4. .<-/-: 5. Respondent Versus 1. 2. Priya Sahu W/oSet Ram Sahu, aged about 60 years, Occupation Labour, resident of Sarangarh Road, District Raigarh, C.G. Kailash Tiwari S/o Vindeshwari Tiwari, aged about 50 years, Occupation Business, resident or Sarangarh Road, District Raigarh.C.G. Smt. Parwati W/'o Haripad Rai, aged about 60 years, Occupation Labour, resident of Sarahgarh Road, District Raigarh, C.G. Jai Ram Yadav S/6 Mahadev Yadav, aged about 44 years, Occupation Business, resident of Sarangarh Road, District Raigarh/C.G. Bajrang Agrawal Sto Rameshwar Agrawal, aged ahout 40 years, Occupation Business, resident of Sarangarh Road, District Raigarh, C.G. State of Chhattisgarh through - the Collector, Raigarh Mynicipai Corporation, through its Commissioner, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh(G.G.) WRIT PETITiON UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: . Hon'ble Shri Justice Satish K. Agnihotri) Present:- Shri Amit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Yashwant Sjngh Thakur, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondent No. 1. \ Shri B.D. Gury, Advocatefor the respondent No.2. ORDER (Passed on this 3" day of July, 2007) 1. Learned coynsel appearing for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are poor persons and carrying of business on mobile thelas, selling tea, biscuit eta. to make both ends meet. The petitioners have been in possession ofthedisputed propertyfor the last 30 years. They would suffer irreparable loss, if without proper [S^ ^'- ^^^t^"' ^^^^^^^ 6. rehabititation to them, they are removed from the disputed place without gjving proper opportunity. Learned counsel further submits that pursuant t6 the ;notice dated 29.5.2007 (Annexure P/3 collectively), the petitioners have submitted their replies to the authorities on 5.6.2007 (AnnexureP/4 collectively), buttherespondents/authoritieshavenot taken anydecision onthesaid repiies. Shri B.D. Guru, learned counsel appearing tor the respondent No. 2/Municipal Corporation, Raigarh categorically submits that no steps for demolition shall be taken before passjng the order on the repliessubmitted bythe petitioners. The respondents/authorities are directed to verify the facts of the case, as stated by learned counselappearing for the petitioners and in the event, it is found proved, the respondents/authorities may take steps for proper rehabilitation of the petitioners before taking any further steps. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitthat in view of the above-stated submissions made by learned counsel appearing forthe respondent No. 2, nothing survives in this matter forthetjme being, at this stage. In view ofthe above, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. B/- Sd/- SatisitK.Agnihotn ? Judge •'ew"" h^^.S^£=^sSW