IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 405 OF 2010 ADV. MARIO PACHECO ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. AGNELO MASCARENHAS AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. D. Pangam,advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 13th December, 2010 P.C: Heard Mr. Pangam, learned counsel for the petitioner. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the judgment and order dated 11/01/2010 passed by the Additional Director of Panchayats. During pendency of the above petition, the Goa Panchayat Raj Act has been amended and Section 201B has been introduced which gives right of revision to a party against the order passed by the Additional Director of Panchayats. In view of the above, I am not inclined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Mr. Pangam seeks leave to approach the District Court under Section 201B of the Act to challenge the impugned order. Mr. Pangam further submits that the petitioner would file the revision application within a period of two weeks and delay in filing the revision application be condoned. In view of the above, the petitioner is allowed to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order by filing revision application to the concerned District Court within a period of two weeks. If revision is filed within a period of two weeks, the concerned District Judge will condone the delay and deal with the revision application in accordance with law. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-