IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 8TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 17TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29699 of 2011(J) --------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- K.R.PONNAN, S/O.RAMAN, AGED 75 YEARS, KARAKODE HOUSE, PUTHIYANKOM P.O.,PALAKKAD-678545 (RC OWNER KL-9/Q-6127) BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE/RDO O/O.RDO, PALAKKAD, 678 001 PIN. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALATHUR POLICE STATION, ALATHUR P.O.,PALAKKAD DIST-678541 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PALAKKAD-678001 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO.29699/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DT.24.9.11 IN NO.A 5240/11 (1) P2: COPY OF THE REVISION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 7.10.11 P3: COPY OF THE INTERIM APPLICATION FOR INTERIM CUSTODY OF THE VEHICLE IN REVISION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DT.7.10.11 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 29699 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 8th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is the registered owner of a mini lorry bearing Regn.No.KL-9 Q-6127. Proceedings under the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001 were initiated culminating in Ext.P1 order. Against Ext.P1, petitioner has filed Ext.P2 revision along with Ext.P3 application for interim custody of the vehicle. Orders have not been passed on Exts.P2 or P3 and that led the petitioner to file this writ petition. 2. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and taking note of the pendency of the revision and the application for interim custody, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P2 revision filed by the petitioner with notice to the parties and in accordance with law. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible. In the meantime, on the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition, the 3rd respondent shall also pass orders on Ext.P3 application made by the petitioner for interim custody of the vehicle applying the WPC No. 29699/11 :2 : principles laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in Shan C.T. v. State of Kerala [2010(3)KHC 333]. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp