THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.33830 of 2010 DT.31.12.2010 Between: S.Penchalaiah … Petitioner And The District Collector, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District and others … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri P.Sridhar Reddy Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP for Civil Supplies The Court made the following ORDER: ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the stay application filed by him in the revision petition filed against order, dated 25.09.2010, passed by respondent No.2, is not being disposed of. At the hearing, Sri P.Sridhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the observations made by respondent Nos.2 and 3 in their orders on the petitioner’s right to question the notification are contrary to the Full Bench Judgment of this Court in M.Vanaja v. B.Balaseshanna and others[1]. In my opinion, this aspect need not be gone into by this Court at this stage, as the petitioner has already availed the remedy of revision. This Court has no manner of doubt that respondent No.1 will deal with this aspect when raised by the petitioner and decide the same in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to dispose of the revision petition, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving notice and opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.42850 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date:31.12.2010 Note: Issue CC in one week. (b/o) VGB [1] 2008(1) ALT 520