[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.363 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4690 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.42 OF 2008 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.363 OF 2008 Shri.Krishna Shankar Shingade ..Appellant Vs. The Additional Commissioner, Pune Divn. Pune & Anr. ..Respondents .... Mr.Sagar Joshi Adv. for Appellant Ms.M.P.Thakur for Respondent-State .... CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 26, 2009 DATE : FEBRUARY 26, 2009 DATE : FEBRUARY 26, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. The learned counsel holding for Mr.Sagar Joshi appearing for Appellant submitted that Mr.Sagar Joshi, the learned counsel appearing in the matter has just left the Court for personal difficulty. On the last occasion also, Mr.Sagar Joshi did not appear and this Court had issued notice to Respondent when Mr.S.M.Oak was holding for Mr.Joshi. The learned A.G.P. had been served with [-2-] the notice and that is how the matter has been listed for admission today. Mr.Sagar Joshi just now appears in the matter. 3. The appellant is aggrieved by the decision of the Additional Commissioner Pune Division, Pune passed on 16.4.2008 dismissing the appeal, confirming the finding recorded in the order dated 12.12.2006 whereby the prayer of regularization of the encroachment has been refused by the Collector, Pune. The basis on which the application for regularisation was rejected, is that the appellant was holding Jirayat land of 2 Hector in ownership rights and reliance was placed on Government Resolution LEN-1078/3483/GI dated 27.12.1978. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we do not find that the learned Single Judge has committed any error or illegality in dismissing the writ petition in limine. Appeal, therefore, stands dismissed. [J.N.PATEL, J.] [J.N.PATEL, J.] [J.N.PATEL, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]