^^ GLE ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTSGABH) PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^ .^s^ ^y^ . •», '\^y ^^-w './• -ly,.s' ^: ^ > ;:> 'n^ - ^° "z^. %%^ (bys. ^' y WRIT PETITION (S) N0: as2-Of 2010 ^~. ^ )^ : Praveen Sharina, Age 49 years S/Q Shri Ramswaroop Sharina, Occupation- Terminated from the post of Deputy Business Manager Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Liinited R/o B-301, Maruti Hights, G.E.Road District- Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary, Department of food and consumer Affaires, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur(C.G.) 2r Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Through its Managing Director, Bal Ashram Parisar, Kutcheiy Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) 3." General Manager, (Administration) Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Liraited, Bal Ashram Parisar, Kutchery Chowk, Raipur 4. M.N.PrasadRao, (Enquiry Officer) General Manager (Transportation) Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Bat Ashram Parisar, Kutcheiy Chowk, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC—78 •"il^i'?;! f^N; 'g"; sii^; wqi=F 's'sr -<ii<iici<<, ®Til'M<i<o,nidi'yy, ..k).f..^.^...:3.1's'.S./..l2. wifcT'iN •qr^ra'^ ft'st ^TBTC ^siRraaii^T sy : rion'uie snn maninura tfiot] 02-03-2010 onn tjiienara iiain Nanue, g Ms. Sangeeta iviishra, Pan^ auvance CODV. onn !<<.r\.vyas, counsei ror DV inis Deiiiion, Dsiiiioner i Limited, Raipur by which penalty' and an arnount of Rs.1 ,50.00,000)1 <->ounsei ror ine oanies uu fiied bv the Detitioner shail be ddcided siav snaii aiso ue consiaereu ana rn vie'vv OT ine suDrnissionsi this petition is finaiEy disposed ^compeienL appeiiaie auinonry^ appiicauon ror siay, expeaiiiousiy an ainnvasiava. >j. ;ounsei ror ine peuuoner. ?i Lawver for the State/ rssoonuent No.1 on resporsQenis r^o.^, o anu 4 on csveai. has chaiienoed the order dated 25/06/2010 passeu Dy ine Manaying uirectpi', L;.u. oiate sjivii buppiies L'orporauon pT removai rrorn service nas Deen iiTiposea h is saia 10 oe recoverea Trorn ine peiiiioner. not dispute that there exists an aitetTiative taken recourse to by fiiing appeal aiong rerneiay OT appeai, wnicn "nas ue^n Vtfitn appilcatlon for grant of stay. in this vle'w of the matter, I am not inciined to entertain this petition at tnis stage. Learned counsei for r^spondents No.2 to 4 states that the appeal expeai'HuuSiy anu ine appiicaiion ror oeciaea ai ine eaniesi. made bv isarned counsei for rescondents, on WELfi uiitecuOEis iu resyonueni 1^0.^. :o decide the Esetitionet s aDoeai as aiso liviinin a reasonaDie iime Sd/- l Manindra Mohan Shrivastav^ Judge