1~^. •^,w L^ -?9A-? IN THi-. F!ADHY,S pi-iADfcSH ADpiI N1 3TRAH U£ TRIBUNAL 3ASALPUS, F1.P. D.A.No. UisO oF 1988 • .•issiji.sm.t: atitia'iss Dr. Kashi prasad Gangais agsd abou'i. 56 yaars son af pt.Bhaguat prasad Gspgsie, Assistant, Oirsctor of Uetsrinary Sisruicss, Uisterinary 'Fiald .issistant T-raining Csntrs, 3agdalpur , Olstt, Bastar, "'i ,p. "8.- ^gg.pSld.gQ.iai^ 1. Ths atats of F1.P. throiigh the Sscratary -fco Uetsrinary Servicss Govt. af M.P., Bhopal, M.p. 2. Thg Oi^astor of yeterinary Serui- css, Nadhya P'radssh, Bhopal, ff.p. .-^.6&lai.Li-i£^It&Jues.iSMIiM.. 1. particulars of ths applicant; Dr . Kashi prasad Gange-ls agsd abaut 56 ysars, sm . of Shri pt. Bhaguant prasad Gangsle, .Assistant Director of Vsterinary Ssruicss, Ueterinary Fisld Assist^nt Training Csntrti', Jagdalpur, Distt:. Bastarn.p. 2. partACulgrs of the rEiSp.-.Mdsnts; , (1) Th@ Ststo of n.p. through ths 3acsstasy to VBtQcinacy Sssvicss', . Govt. ofp'i.F., BhDpal,!".p. . (2) ThsQirsctor of,VBt:-,rin3ry Sisrvicss7 Madnya pradesh, Bhopal., n .p. ' ;' s^^wSs^'^SsS^:!::^-^ 3. psarticulars of ths ordsr against uhich applica. ti ai ia made, Ths application i's inade for quashing of dspartmsntal snquiry undar Chargs-shsel: (\!o. 205/0 Q/BE;/ Bhopal dated 24.2.1986. and for eon sids'raticn for pramofciai to th. post of Osputy Diroctor of Vstarinary Ssruicss in accordancs uit.h ths r'l.p.Vste- rinary Servicss (Gazettad S.scruitmsnta SljlES, 1966. 4, 3urisdicti.cn of ths T.1:ibunal; T'n.s applicant. dsclarss 'fchat tha subjact matter of ths order agai-nsfc uhich ha uanfcs rGdr-'issal is i-iithin tha jurisdiction of b'ne Hon'bla Tribunal. 5. Limifcatian The 'applicant furthsr dedarsis th.it tha applicai-ion is uithin ths limi •fcatLon proscribod in •a'Sction 21 of the .AdEninistratiue Tribunals Act. 1985 . Facfcs of ths cass ; Ths fac-ts af tihs cass ars given bslou r^ (a) Tha peti-fcia-i er j'oin.sd Vstsri.nary Sisrvices in •fch.s Stata as Assis-fcant Suj'geon on 10.12!.1g54 and promofcod as Assistai-it Oiroctor of Veterinary Sarviciis on 1.7.1972. Tharsafter, ths ps-bitiansr has n o-fc bssn allousd eusn to sarn a singia promo. tion SQlely becausa af ths -a^eWa'ano u.ljust •yi IA?A discipliciary procsedings^institu'fcsd ,3nd kapt psnding for an unduly lang psriQd ef •fci'ne agaiRsfc ^ XI,iHg—7g .^ ^' -'' -T' 371^!?(3;T IS"*i* "^sn 3T^?i ^pN? WH *flt«nia*<<iq» TSf^fPTIWT, a-rtl«*i<o, isfMwy ^J^.^..L..^.l. 311^t1'T;i%'('yii ^ttt^ «[?<T3H^F: S.B: Hon'ble Justlce Mr. Prltlnker Diwaker prosecution. However, ^raf^E^? ^Ti^f ^f^^ <f^4^k ^r aifin sd^i 14-05-2009 Even after issuanc^ of SPC to the petitioner(s) no representation has been ijnade. In these circumstatices, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the jsetition for non prosecution. Accordingly, the rtetition is dismissed for non he petitioner(s) would be at Siberty to file an appiicatlffrn fo.r restoration of the same if cause still survives. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge