// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.896/2000 M/s Jaspal Enterprises through the Proprietor Jaspal Singh Versus The State of Rajasthan through the Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur and Another Date of Order ::: 16.04.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Amit Ratnawat and Shri Brij Sharma, Advocates, for Shri R.B. Mathur, Counsel for petitioner Smt. Sudesh Kasana, Dy. Govt. Counsel for respondents #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the parties. The present writ petition has been preferred to quash the notice dated 26th February, 2000, issued by the respondent No.2 – the Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer, Anti Evasion-II, Circle-2, Jaipur Zone-II, Kar Bhawan, Jaipur. The respondents have filed the reply to the writ petition, wherein it is mentioned that the petitioner has already filed reply to show-cause notice, which is under challenge, and, after affording an opportunity to the petitioner, the respondent No.2 has already passed the assessment order dated 4th March, 2000, a copy of which has been placed on the record as Annexure R-2 with the reply to the writ petition. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that in view of the assessment order passed by the respondent No.2, the writ petition has become infructuous and prays for dismissal // 2 // thereof as such. I have perused the contents of the writ petition as well as the reply to the writ petition and, after considering the same, I find that, in view of the order passed by the Assessing Authority, a copy of which has been annexed with the writ petition, the present writ petition has become infructuous and the same is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//