WP(C) 3871/2011 BEFORE HON BLE MR JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY (Amitava Roy,J) Heard Mr Parasar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Adhikari , learned State counsel. It is submitted at the Bar that the name of Mr SC Biswas, learne d counsel for the petitioner has been wrongly shown in the cause list. On a pray er made to that effect, the same is deleted. For the order proposed to be passed, it is not considered to issu e formal notice. The pleaded case of the petitioner’s in short is that, she is th e daughter of a member of the staff of the establishment of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonitpur, who had superannuated on 30.11.2008. On her application th ereafter, she was provided with a casual employment on temporary basis at a fix ed monthly salary of Rs 1800/- and though she, joined the service in that capa city on 15.11.2008/29.11.2008 , her services were terminated on 28.2.09 on the ground of paucity of fund. The petitioner is before this court with the grievan ce that inspite of above assigned reason, the respondent No.2, had successfully engaged the Respondent Nos 3,4 and 5 as casual employees in the said establishme nt. Being aggrieved, the petitioner, has, in the meanwhile submitted a represen tation before the Respondent No.2 on 6.6.2011 ventilating her grievances and for consideration of her case for employment. According to her, the said representa tion is pending as on date. Mr Parasar while reiterating the above, submits that it would me et the expectation of the petitioner if this petition is closed at this stage with a direction to the Respondent No.2 to consider and decide on her represent ation dated 6.6.2011. Mr Adhikari has on objection to this mode of disposal. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on a consid eration of the pleaded case, this petition is closed by requiring the Respondent No.2, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonitpur, Tezpur to take a decision on the pet itioner’s representation dated 6.6.2011. It is made clear that this order should not be construed to a direction to the Respondent No.2 to appoint the petitione r in any capacity whatsoever. No costs.