IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.4767 of 2010 Ramesh Nandan Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. with MJC No.4768 of 2010 Dinesh Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. with MJC No.4771 of 2010 Rajiv Ranjan Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. with MJC No.4772 of 2010 Manoj Kumar Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. with MJC No.4776 of 2010 Arun Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. with MJC No.4910 of 2010 Ramdeo Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with MJC No.4911 of 2010 Pramod Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr with MJC No.4992 of 2010 Swarajya Kumar Shandilya Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. with MJC No.4998 of 2010 Manish Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. 2 ----------- 5 6.7.2011 In all these contempt applications by different orders under contempt the direction of this Court was to consider and dispose of the claims of the respective petitioners within a period of four months. In some of the contempt applications show causes have been filed in which it is stated that the claims of the respective petitioners have been disposed of and payments have also been made to them. Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the same position prevails with respect to all the contempt applications. In the said circumstances, no case for proceeding further with the contempt applications is made out. The contempt applications are, accordingly, dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners’ claim for interest has not been considered by the opposite parties. It would be open to them to raise any such plea before the concerned authority or before any appropriate forum. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )