1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3914 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION ST.NO.306 OF 2009 Rahul Sudhakar Savaji Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra and others. ..Respondents ..... Mr.S.K. Chavan, holding for Mr.R.V. Gore, Advocate for applicant. Mr.P.P. More, A.P.P. for respondent no.1. Mr.Kailash B. Jadhav, Advocate for respondent nos.2 to 6. ..... (CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE,J.) DATE : 30th April, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr.S.K. Chavan, learned counsel holding for Mr.R.V. Gore, learned counsel for applicant as well as Mr.P.P. More, learned A.P.P. for respondent no.1 and Mr.Kailash B. Jadhav, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 to 6. 2. This is an application preferred by applicant seeking condonation of delay of 2 days caused in filing Criminal Revision Application challenging judgment and order of acquittal dated 7th August, 2009 rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge-2 in Sessions case no.1/2009. 2 3. Considering the contents of application and for the reasons stated therein, it appears that the delay caused in filing accompanying Criminal Revision Application is not willful, deliberate and intentional , and therefore, same needs to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4. In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause `B' thereof and delay of 2 days caused in filing accompanying Criminal Revision Application is condoned and the said Criminal Revision Application be registered and numbered and applicant to get circulation for the said Criminal Revision Application accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE) JUDGE gas/cri3914.09