IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18718 of 2011 SURENDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 16.6.2011 After having heard learned counsel for the parties, the court does not find any merit in the present petition in view of the reasons which have been assigned by the learned Sessions Judge, Bhojpur while disposing of anticipatory bail petition no. 330 of 2011. However, there is an order dated 13.4.2011 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur at Ara annexed to this petition, which indicates that one of the co accused Jai Kishore Sharma has been admitted to bail on the reasons which are assigned in that particular order. If the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail, the C.J.M. Ara shall look to those reasons assigned by the learned Additional Sessions Judge while disposing of the bail petition of co accused Jai Kishore Sharma and dispose of the prayer of the petitioner for bail without being prejudiced by any order passed under section 438 Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of with the aforementioned observations/directions. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)