1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVN. APPLICATION NO. 569 OF 2009 Fatima Sanghvi & ors. ... Applicants v/s The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay ... Respondent Mr.R.A.Thorat i/by Devendra Udani for the applicants. Mr.U.J.Makhija i/by M/s.Kavita Poojary for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 3RD DECEMBER, 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard learned advocates for both parties. 2. By concurrent findings of fact, both the Court below have held that the respondent – Port Trust has validly terminated the tenancy of the applicant by issuing notices on 27.10.1969 and later on 4.7.1977. The Courts have held that the applicants / defendants are not entitled to the 2 protection of either the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Control Act, 1947 or the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. 3. In my view, no error has been committed by the Courts below. The notices issued by the Port Trust terminating the tenancy have been validly issued and, therefore, no fault can be found with the orders passed. 4. Civil revision application dismissed. 5. On the application made by the learned advocate for the applicants, the decree will not be executed for a period of 12 weeks from today, on usual undertaking being furnished to this Court within two weeks from today. ..... 3