1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 208/2010. The Municipal Council, Chandrapur. -: VERSUS :- Anjanabai Narayan Bankar and another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 21, 2010. Heard Shri M.I. Dhatrak, learned counsel for petitioner, Shri N.D. Khamborkar, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and Shri S.J. Gadmade, learned counsel for respondent no.2. Shri Dhatrak, learned counsel contends that the Municipal Council is not obstructing the possession of respondent no.1 and finding to that effect reached in the impugned order dated 20.11.2009 is erroneous. Shri Khamborkar, learned counsel states that police protection is given to respondent no.1 because of the alleged obstruction and if the statement of Municipal Council is recorded, respondent no.1 does not have any grievance against Municipal Council. 2 Shri Dhatrak, learned counsel has pointed out that a show cause notice for civil imprisonment is issued to the Chief Officer of Municipal Council in the impugned order. I have perused the impugned order. In view of the statement made by the Municipal Council that it is not obstructing the possession of respondent no.1 in any way, it is clear that respondent no.1 does not need any police protection against Municipal Council. The Trial Court has only called upon the Chief Officer to file his reply to the show cause notice. If the trial Court is satisfied with the reply, it is apparent that no such action in the matter will be called for against the Chief Officer. The Chief Officer to file that reply. Observations if any and findings in the impugned order against the Chief Officer shall not influence the trial Court while considering that reply. With these observations and directions, Writ Petition is disposed of, with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.