IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 25276 of 2005 BETWEEN: Shiva Bar & Restaurant & Hotel Aishwarya Residency, Premises No.3-2-1/1/2, Beside Kumar Theatre, Kachiguda Station Road, Hyderabad, represented by its Manager, Sri K. Madhu, S/o Rama Swamy. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner of police, East Zone, Hyderabad. 3 The Deputy Commissioner of police, Task Force East Zone, Hyderabad. 4 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Kachiguda, Hyderabad. 5 The Station House Officer, Kachiguda Police Station, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering and preventing the petitioner from running the Bar/Restaurant in providing entertainment by way of live ban/orchestra in the petitioner's premises as illegal, and unconstitutional and violation of judgment of the Apex Court of India, and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner for conducting the Orchestra/live band in the petitioners' premises and pass such further other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter was taken up for hearing on 19.06.2008, as none appeared for the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, neither the petitioner appears nor there is any representation on its behalf. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J June 26, 2008 DSK