1 wp3100.09.sxw ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3100 OF 2009 Sou. Rekha Rajaram Gophane ....Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents. Mr. V.S. Talkute, for the Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, APP for the State. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 4th August, 2010 P.C.: 1 We have heard Mr. Talkute, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, who is the mother of the deceased Mrs. Smita Amit Kokare. The deceased was married about four months prior to the date of the incident i.e. 31/08/2009 and was cohabiting for about two months prior to the date of the incident. Both husband and wife were staying in a Government Bunglow located in the Court premises at Manmad, where Shri Amit Kokare was the Judicial Magistrate, First Class. We have also perused the P.M. report and the statements of the witnesses Shri Talkute wanted us to show. We also perused the spot panchanama dated 31/08/2009, as well as the 2 wp3100.09.sxw ssm inquest panchanama drawn on 31/08/2009. On completion of investigation the I.O. has submitted a charge-sheet for the offence punishable under Section 498-A of IPC against Shri Amit Kokare and it is pertinent to note that though the incident took place on 31/08/2009, the Petitioner approached the police with a complaint for the offences punishable under Section 302 and 498-A of IPC on 18/10/2009. The Petitioner prays for transfer of investigation in C.R. No. 164 of 2009 to the CBI or any other independent agency. 2 After having heard Mr. Talkute, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and perused the statements relied upon by him, we are satisfied that there is no case made out to direct further investigation by any other agency like CBI. Prima facie it appears to us that the charge-sheet does not suffer from any deficiencies. 3 The Petition is rejected. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)