iJM 'I'HE H10H COUm' OF CHHArriSGAKH : B1LASPUR Wnt Petition (C) No, 49 of 2007 Petitioner h^i^ Versus Respondents 1. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Navatbati, aged about 35 years, wite of Shri Dalcvvar, resident of Daniyakhurd, Tah. Kawardha, Distt. Kaberdhaiii (C,G,) Snit. S. Kuinad, aged about 40 years, wife of Shri Ranichand, resideut of \dUage Dardyakiiurd, Tah. Kawaixlha, Distt. Kaberdhain (C.G.) FZunti Bai, aged about 30 years, wife of Shri Naiihu Raiii, resident of Daoiyakhurd, Tali. Kawardha, Distt. Kaberdham (C.G.) Bhagwantui, aged about 46 years, wtfe of Sbii Bagesa, resident of resident of DaBiyakhuid, Tah. Kawaidha, Distt. Kabeerdhaca (C.G.) Shribati Sahu, aged aboiit 35 years, Vvife of Shri Kajaram Sahu, resident of Dardyakhurd, Tah. Kawardha, Distt, Kabeerdham (C.G.) A< K. Slidvastava, Retuming Officer, Gram Panchayat Daiuyakhurd, Naib Tahsildai' Sahaspur Lohara, Pethaseen Adhil^ari, PoUiug Booth Centre Daiiiya]<:hiud, Bootii No. 119, tlii'ough - Janpad PanchQyat Sahas Lohara. Pethasen Adtdkad, Polluig Booth Centre \nUage Beeranpur, Khurd, PoUiag Booth No. 120, thiough - the Jaiipad Pauchayat Sahas LoUara, 1 be Sub Divisional Olficer/ Prescribed Authorit5r/ Election Tribunal, Kawardha, Distt. Kaberdham (C.G.) WKl'r PKHFIQN UNDER AEriCLE22t)0£'I'HE CONSTITUTIQN OEINDIA (SB: Hon'ble Stui Satish K. Agmhotan J.) Shri Ashok Das Vaishiiav, Advocate with Shri Saineer Sahu, Advocate tor the petitioner. vShn Ashok Dixit, Advocate lor the respondent IMo, 1. Stiri Ajit Singh, Adyocate for the respondent Mo. 7. /^f\ l.^¥ -»- ^ Q R D E R (Passed on ttais 30m day ot' September, 2008) 1. Learned counsel appeanng for the respondent No.l subniits that the inipugned order dated 20.12.2006 (Amiexiire P/7), passed by the Sub Divisional OfHcer (Revenue) (Prescnbed AuUionty/Election Tribuiial), Kawardha may be set-aside and the autliority concerned niay be directed to proceed with the petition aad pass appropnate order, ia accordance with law. 2. In view of the categorical stotenxent luade by learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.l, nothiag remaias for adjudication in tbis petiltion. 3. Accordmgiy, the impugned order dated 20.12.2006 (Amiexure P/7) is set-aside. 'l'he Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) (1-Tescribed Aumoiity/Election Tribunal), Kawardha raay proceed with the case for decision on nients, iti accordance with law. 4. 'l'he petition is atlowed to the above extent. No order asto costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge Thakur