1 arbp546-11g vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.546 OF 2011 Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. IT Inegrated Solutions Ltd. & Ors. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.547 OF 2011 Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Shrawankumar N. Sharma ....Respondent WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.548 OF 2011 Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Praveen K. Vardhman ....Respondent WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.549 OF 2011 Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Amma Lines Limited & Anr. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.550 OF 2011 Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Shruti Arts Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.551 OF 2011 Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. M/s.Mahavir Associates ....Respondent 2 arbp546-11g WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.552 OF 2011 Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Apurva Enterprises & Anr. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.553 OF 2011 Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Seema Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.554 OF 2011 Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Peacock Media Ltd. & Ors. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.555 OF 2011 Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. M/s.Leena Designs ....Respondent WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.556 OF 2011 Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Jeevandeep Hospital & Critical Care Centre ....Respondent WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.557 OF 2011 Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Bhavik Furniture Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.558 OF 2011 3 arbp546-11g Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Stonemann Royale Ltd. & Anr. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.559 OF 2011 Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. B.K. Mukhta Pasha ...Respondent WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.560 OF 2011 Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Dynamic Computers & Anr. ....Respondents WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.599 OF 2011 Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Jawahar M. Seth ....Respondent WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.587 OF 2011 Tata Capital Limited ....Petitioner V/s. S. Irshad Ahmed ....Respondent Mr.Nikhil Mehta with Mr.Rahul Mehta i/b KMC Legal Venture for the Petitioner. None for the Respondents. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 21ST JULY, 2011. P.C. :- 4 arbp546-11g 1. These are petitions under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 2. An ad-interim order dated 4.7.2011 in terms of prayer (b) was passed. The respondents have remained absent, though served. In view of their having failed to file any reply and in view of their having failed to appear despite the interim orders, the plaintiffs’ rights are required to be further protected. 3. The above petitions are made absolute in terms of prayer (d). Prayer (d) is however restricted to the respondents’ immovable properties. The affidavits as required by prayer (d) shall be filed within two weeks of being served a copy of this order. Liberty to the respondents to apply to have this order modified or vacated in the event of their furnishing the security to the extent of the claim in respect of the corresponding petitions. No order as to costs. The undertaking to file affidavit of service, if not already filed, within two weeks from today is accepted.