N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILAS «UR/' WPNo. 29‘42 i2001 PETITIOWR : Camal Eye Secure net di‘a) ’ "' A film xeg'sta’ed Linda the Pmmaship Act wough Choudhaly its working Sfo Shri panna Vlshvnam Choudhaiy, Aged about 46 years, R/o MD. 45, AdityaNagar ('Iiturdih) Durg 491001(C11hat1isgarh) Hm Amhozity ofIndia Lui Through its Chainnm, New Delhi. M ‘ Nhnag‘ng Breech; Philai Sted Plant, H1ilaii H Genaal W, (Administrmion Townsship), p'v ‘X‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226i227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. DaaiIS ofthe petiiion. PARTICIJLARS OF THE PEIITIONER 'As per we title. ARTIOULARS OF THE RESPONDENT / I P S: , f / Lw‘ v Y a: / J IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILAS UR// WPNo. iiiez /2001 I \1v‘ X 7 C ;\% ) \ ¥;C f/ 3/ wavtzwyamm‘éw \9J _ Kix" W1? \WiémaalW . , , a Wwn u§ "xndiaa Tmaught $aerataxy Kama a££a£w amt. cf Inéiap New mihio :9. Es; \j 5%;ata. ag Chhattisgwh: Tmwagm gamwazyfwwm a»? Emma; 13$. Ehawas; Ra&pm (t;?v:ha~tti$garh) . 10 \ “gammmmw mva / x2§.09.;2002 x » x Shri Rajeev ShrivaStava,' cc unsel for the etitioner. Shri Prashant Mishra a lonwith Shn' P.P.Sahu 'wh .da for respondens o, 1 o 3, tl N t ‘ ‘ appears on behalf ofDr.N.K.Sh11 Shri U.N.S.Deo, counsel f0 } ‘ x v m State] respondent No5. i '.Dy.Advocate General for. ‘$h11' Sanjay‘ KAgrawal‘ Heaxd. The petitioner is a regisrtered partnership fnm, which provides security guards. 011‘ ytenders was issued by the B] security guards and security su] the public premises of Bhilai tov respgnse thereto, the petition: However, due to certain objectio was not considered, as accordi] ‘ "i A _ , 1 3.16.2061 a _no1~_ice inviting lilai ’Steel IPlant for prouiding )ervisors for the schools and 1n nship and the mining area. In r has submiiteci his tender. as, the tender of the petitioner 1g to the «authorities it did not fulfil the conditions regarding eXPerience. @ggr’ieved therewith, £ ‘ the petitioner approached this Court and an interim order was been made 12'll that date: status v E ssed atjf no allotment had .r' r responent o.4. d N p \ g o ’ oa th a ¢ n a ‘a l 1 2 l i l l 1 1 ’ ‘. ... ............:.....x... .............. ~ $200 Wm ,mW) m( mwm “v” ‘ ) ‘ ‘ ' » y I 5 mm wmr; amimanévr of order is. 41.122001 be ¥ quo :as éexisu'ng 9n the date I maintamed. 3 Wenithe matter was taken up today, the learned (minaret for r€ZSpd;ndents No. 1 to 3 éubmiWIed that after mconsidsring,t11e I matter, 5 the I au‘rhon'ties have taken a'decisién to issue a fres tender and if in respQIise 'thereto {he etiioner s X ; ‘ x tende:1‘, €he same shall be constdered on merits alonwit al 1 otherieh'gible (Jeers that may be f in re I s ew o the miatter, the Courtfeels that no useful purposewill be serve in keeping this writ petition, as the grievance of the etitioner n i longer siuvives. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed o Witii a direction that steps may b: taken by respondents No. 1, and 3 to issue fresh tender preferably Within 4 Weeks from toda and in case the petitioner submite his tener, at e considere on its own merits alongwith a'l eners submitted by other eligible persons who may also fuljil the conditions. With magaforesaiii observah'on and direction, the petiti stands disosed o S l 1 ‘ —S/350—12/2000~—50,0. E00 / Sdl— P.C-Naik Judge X {/‘t L p f. \ h pt ubmits his gh l ound odr. n thi Vi f d p o f 2 y‘ d th b d td f, on ,J i