Hié‘EE’i QGURT QF CF§H$?T§$QARH g? ILASPUR DlWSiGN BENCH QSMM: E‘§Q§$’ELE SHRE RIUEEV GU??A5 CJ. 8: HGN’BLE $HRE SUNéL KUMAR $INHA, ‘i. WEE? PE?ETEC£N {PEEJ M). 4%8’El28§? ' TETE®E¥ER$ BaEjinder Singh, S/o Samar Hamans Singh. aged about 43 years, Rio MJG. No.188, Tatiband, Raipur {0.G.) Sukhwant Singh, Sfo Samar Jagir Singh, aged ahoui 45 years; Rio 2%A Dakshm Gawgetri, Supeia Chewiwa Bhila§, Tehsii 8: District Dufg (C.G.) Vsgmug State sf Chhat‘tisgarh, Thmugh —- ihe Secretary, Department 0f ' Raad Transport, DKS. Bhawan, Raipur {(3.61) Union of india, Through ~ the Secretary, Minisiry of Read Transport & Highways, Gavemment of ‘ Endi&, Parivahan Bhawan, 1, Samsad Marg, New Delhi — HQQO. Mls Venus Tails, through —, Shr§ Prakash Khampayiya‘ S/o BD. Khampariya, Partner cf M/s Venus ToHs, RIG 321‘ Sangivini Nagar, Jabaipur (MR) Wa’iii §et§iima Umkg' Art‘mge 226 Q§ me Gansiiiutmn a? mdm RES9QNBEMTS Pmmm : 3m Dheerag Wankhede, counsei forihe petiiionera Shri $umesh Baliaj! Gavt. Advacate f0; the Sia'tefrespondem No.1. Shri Bhi3hm& Kinger, stanzimg coun5ei fer respondent N02, None for respondent No3. @RDER w“ Septemberg 29%) The foliowing ordey of the Court was passed by Regeev Gwta‘ $.J. 3hr? Sumesh Bajaj, !eamed Government Advocate f0¥ the State submits that the writ petition fited by the petitioners chaiienging the recovery of toil tax by respondent No.3 has now, become infruo‘tuoue as the period of agreement with respondent No.3 in that behatf has aiready come to an end. 2) in this View of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as intructuous. Sdl‘ Sd/- Chief Justice ‘ SunilKumar Sinha J; Judge padma