IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2009 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 28600 of 2009(T) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- 1. A.M.SUNIL, 24/672/(7) TAMANNA MYTHRI NAGAR, CHAKKANTHARA, NURANI PO PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. PRASEETHA MENON MELAKAM, KAVILPAD, OLAVAKKODE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY PALAKKAD, REP BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY PALAKKAD. ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON FOR R1 SRI.JIBU P THOMAS FOR R1 SRI.P.S.APPU FOR R1 SRI.A.R.NIMOD FOR R1 SRI.C.A.ANOOP FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 28600/2009 T APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1. COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR GRANTING BUILDING PERMIT. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 17/09/2009. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL. / TRUE COPY / PS TO JUDGE. tga THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.28600 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of December, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioners challenge the refusal to grant building permit. Ext.P2 has been issued rejecting the application. Learned counsel for the municipality states that a proposal has been made to the Government seeking revision of the scheme and orders are awaited and that the petitioners' application could be re-considered in the light of such revision, if they re- submit the same. To facilitate that, Ext.P2 is quashed and the municipality will decide afresh on Ext.P1, if it is presented on revision of the scheme. The writ petition is ordered accordingly, without entering on merits. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.19/12.