presc A*a ^W-JJ ,A..--"" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILAPUR WRIT PETITION N of 2006 PETITIONER: 7 H.C.Singh, Son of Shn Ghanshyam, aged about 52 years, Presently posted as Sub-Engineer J.B.C., Sub division N0-4 Nandelibhata Sakti under muiimata Bango canal division No-6 Sakti District Janjgir Champa (C. G.) VERSUS ffw •^g ^ RESPONDENTS 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Through Secretary water ^ resources Department D.K.S.Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) 2. Secretary water resources Department D.K.S.Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) 3. ENGINEER-IN- CHIEF ^ Water resources Department Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER AJITICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FQR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE^NATURE OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARI ETC OR DIRECTIONIS1 / ORDERfSl IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. l? 'G^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAH AT BILASPUR W8n'PETmON_MO._2308^QF_2M6 H.C. Singh Versus Stats of Chhattisgarh & Others Dr. N.K. Shukla, Sr. Advocate with Shri A.K. Yadav, counse! for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Advocats General with Shri Sushil Dubey, Gevt. Advocate for the State/respondents. th RDER Learned counsel appsaring for the pstitioner as wetl as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petition are simifar to that of in W.P.No.1051 of 2006 (Santosh Kumar Singh vs. Stafe of Chhattisgarh and others) which was affowsd vide order dated 14-7-2006. They further submit that the question of !aw invo'ved is ateo the same. 2) In v,s«of the above state submisstons made by tearned counsel for She parties, the writ petifion is aflowed in terms of the order dated 14-7-2006 passed by Shis Court jn W.P.No.1051 of 2006 (Santosh Kumar Singh vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others). No order as So costs. L Sd/- SanjayKAgarwal Judge ....^-^ ,^_^T