IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5039 of 2009 MD.NOMAN SIDDIQUI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 21.04.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondents. Vigilance Case No. 6/2000 came to be instituted against the petitioner when simultaneously departmental proceedings were initiated and he was placed under suspension on 6.2.2001. The enquiry report in the departmental proceeding came to be submitted on 24.3.2003. On 15.3.2003 the respondents vacated the suspension subject to the final orders that may be passed in the vigilance matter and the departmental proceedings. It is submitted that subsequently sanction has been accorded for his prosecution in the vigilance case. Only for that reason the petitioner has now been placed under suspension again on the same allegations, with regard to the same departmental proceedings, same vigilance case in respect of which after consideration of everything the order of suspension was withdrawn. The order of suspension dated 27.1.2009 at Annexure 1 simply states that in view of the sanction accorded for his prosecution in the vigilance matter he was being suspended. This Court is satisfied that there is no occasion for the fresh suspension of the petitioner merely on grounds of sanction being accorded in the vigilance matter. The impugned order dated 27.1.20098 is quashed. This Court makes no observation or interference with the orders dated 15.3.2003 and 9.4.2003 passed by the authorities with regard to the petitioner. The writ application stands allowed to the extent indicated above. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)