IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 752/2008 Uttam Komwad -Vs. - State of Maharashtra. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR, J DATED : 9 th APRIL, 2008. Heard Shri V. G. Gawai, Advocate for the applicant and APP for the respondent State. Interim order was passed on 29th February, 2008. The only question is whether that order needs to be confirmed. Learned counsel for the applicant specifically contended that he has not sanctioned any project work in the capacity of C.E.O. On the contrary, proposal was forwarded to C.E.O. The relevant copy of the note sheet has been filed on record. Therefore, it appears that the applicant has not sanctioned this proposal and it was in fact sanctioned by C.E.O. In these circumstances, the interim order needs to be confirmed. In the event of arrest of the applicant for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 468, 471 r/w section 34 of the I.P.C. in Crime No.375/2007, of Police Station Washim, he be released on bail on furnishing surety and P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- subject to conditions that he shall report at Police Station Washim, as and when directed by the I.O. for the purposes of investigation and shall not directly or indirectly tamper with the prosecution evidence. Application stands disposed of. However, liberty to the respondent to move for cancellation of bail if the statement of applicant that the projects were sanctioned by C.E.O. is found to be incorrect JUDGE GSK