IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 3 OF 2010 SHRI. FRANCISCO MASCARENHAS ... Petitioner Versus MAPUSA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH CHIEF OFFICER MAPUSA ... Respondent Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 1st July, 2010 P.C. Heard. Notice to the respondents dispensed with. 2. There is no dispute that the documents sought to be produced by the plaintiff, are in possession of the defendant. According to the plaintiff the said documents are public documents. Defendants in their reply have clearly stated that they had no objection if the plaintiff was allowed to produce photo copy of the said documents, as can be seen from the reply filed by them. In view of the stand taken by the defendants, the plaintiff would be allowed to produce photo copies of the documents sought to be produced by the plaintiff and which are in possession of the defendant. 3. With the above observation writ petition is disposed of. N. A. BRITTO, J. vn