AB 195/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr. J Handique, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard M r. K Munir, learned Addl. PP, Assam. This is an application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioners, namely, 1. Md. Rahimuddin, 2. Md. Imranuddin Ahmed @ Runjun and 3. Smt. Rani Khan praying for g ranting privilege of pre-arrest bail in connection with Dergaon PS Case No.168/2 010 under Section 366 IPC. As directed by this Court vide order dated 7.3.2011, learned Addl. PP has produc ed the case diary before this Court which contains the statements made by the vi ctim girl before the Magistrate and the police. I have perused the same which reveals that the petitioner Nos.2 and 3 were in lo ve for last more than five years. But the family members of the petitioner No.3, i.e. the victim girl wanted her to be married with a person of Afganistan. She informed the petitioner about the same and requested him to marry her and accord ingly, the petitioner took the girl away to Dibrugarh and married her before the Kazi at Tinsukia as per Muslim customs. At present they are living as husband a nd wife. While recording the statements under Section 164 CrPC, the victim girl stated her age to be 21 years. In view of the above, the interim bail granted earlier to the petitioners aboven amed is made absolute subject to the following conditions: 1. That the petitioners shall make themselves available before the Investig ating Officer as and when required. 2. That the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducemen t, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as t o dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police Offi cer. The bail application, accordingly, stands disposed of.