IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 8571 of 2008. Decided on : 31st March, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Nirmala Devi. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. A.K. Bansal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. None for respondents No. 3 and 4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Consequently, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending applications, if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge March 31, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. - 2 - - 3 - `