IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7095 of 2008 DR.KRISHNA CHANDRA KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 14.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure – 8, which he calls discriminatory and arbitrary and also having the effect of may be lowering his pay scale to which he is entitled to by virtue of a notification contained in Annexure –10 dated 06.11.2007. The benefit of first A.C.P. & second A.C.P. granted to the petitioner is not in dispute, but the court also takes notice of the fact that this benefit of notification is subject to certain conditions which are evident from paragraph nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6. This court does not find any conflict between the decisions taken contained in Annexure – 8, and the benefit which has been granted to the petitioner in Annexure – 10. Merely because the petitioner is being posted and saddle with a responsibility not in consonance to his pay scale, it does not mean that the petitioner is being relegated to lower post or lower salary. The present situation was envisaged as is evident from clause (3) of Annexure -10. There is no merit in the writ application. It is dismissed accordingly. Rajeev/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)