STR 767/02- Asstt.Commercial Tax Officer Vs.M/sSanjay Granites, Abu Road Judgment dt.5.2.09 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT Asstt.Commercial Tax Officer Vs.M/s Sanjay Granites,Abu Road. S.B. SALES TAX REVISION PETITION NO.767/2002 Date of Order : 5th February, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Vineet Mathur with Mr. Rishab Sancheti for the petitioner. None present for the respondents. --------- 1. This revision petition has been filed by the Revenue against the order of the Tax Board dated 11.4.2001 whereby the Tax Board upholding the order of the learned Dy. Commissioner (Appeals) held that the Assessing Authority was not justified in estimating the sale of packing material at the rate of 11% of the total value of goods in question i.e. granite slabs sold by the assessee and, therefore, the levy of additional tax on alleged sale of packing material was set aside by both the appellate authorities. 2. The learned Tax Board has clearly found in its impugned order that the assessee did not charge anything separate for the sale of packing material nor any tax was collected on such sale of packing material. 3. The goods in question i.e. granite is sold as a packing material like Bardana etc. and the assessee contended that the value STR 767/02- Asstt.Commercial Tax Officer Vs.M/sSanjay Granites, Abu Road Judgment dt.5.2.09 2/2 of such packing material was insignificant and there was no express or implied sale of such packing material by the assessee, therefore, the assessee did not charge anything separately for such sale of packing material to the purchasers. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the Revenue and having gone through the impugned orders, this Court is satisfied that the findings of fact arrived at by both the appellate authorities did not give rise to any question of law requiring consideration by this Court under Section 86 of the RST Act, 1994. These are essential findings of fact and both the appellate authorities have rightly set aside the levy of additional tax on the assumed sale of packing material by the learned Assessing Authority at 11% of the value of granite slabs sold. No such evidence for separate sale of packing material was brought on recored by the learned assessing authority prior to imposition of such additional tax and, therefore, the learned appellate authorities concurrently and rightly held that levy of such additional tax was not justified. 5. This Court finds no force in the present revision petition of the revenue and same being devoid of merit is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. Copy of this order be sent to respondent- assessee. [ DR. VINEET KOTHARI ], J. item No.12 babulal/-