1 ABA-26.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.26 OF 2011 Sandesh Ananta Patil .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri M.A. Noorani for the Applicant. Ms S.D. Shinde, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JANUARY 27, 2011 P.C: 1. The learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant had reported at the Wada Police Station pursuant to the order of this Court dated 19-1-2011. The learned APP states that further investigation is required according to the I.O.. Since the allegation in this case is about alleged embezzlement of Rs. 80,000/-, the learned counsel for the applicant states that though the applicant has not received any such amount, without prejudice to his rights the applicant would deposit an amount of Rs.80,000/- with the trial Court within a period of three weeks. In view of this, there is no question of the applicant 2 ABA-26.11 being subjected to any custodial interrogation. The order dated 19-1-2011 is, therefore, confirmed on the additional condition that the applicant shall deposit with the trial Court within three weeks a sum of Rs.80,000/- which amount the trial Court shall invest in any interest earning fixed deposit and shall deal with the same at the end of the trial as per the result of the case. 2. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicant may furnish fresh bond before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, dated 2-12-2010, delivered in Criminal Appeal No.2271 of 2010, arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 7615 of 2009 {Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.}. 3. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)