1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4213 of 2011. Moreshwar Sudamji Upare ..vs.. The State of Mah. through the Secretary, Rural Development and Weater Resources Department and others. =-=-==-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. G.N.Khanzode, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. A.M.Deshpande, AGP for Res.1 to 3. C ORAM : D.D.SINHA AND A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : 16th NOVEMBER, 2011. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the following facts are not in dispute. That the petitioner was appointed as Shikshan Sevak vide order dated 23rd October, 2003 and was brought on regular establishment as an Assistant Teacher w.e.f. 6/11/2006 and from that date the petitioner was given pay scale applicable to the Assistant Teacher. The grievance of the petitioner is that the said pay scale should have been given to the petitioner from the date of his initial appointment i.e. w.e.f. 23rd October, 2003. The contention canvassed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is misconceived. In the instant case, it is not in dispute that the petitioner was appointed as Shikshan Sevak as 2 per the Scheme of Shiklshan Sevak and pay scale applicable to the petitioner is as per the Scheme of Shikshan Sevak. Services of the petitioner was regularized as an Assistant Teacher w.e.f. 6/11/2006 and the pay scale applicable to the said post is given to the petitioner from that date. In the circumstances, action of the respondent is just and proper. Hence, no interference is called for. Writ petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE. chute