^ G^f^ [_ BEFORETHE HON'BLEHIGHCOURTOFCHHArnSGARHAT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (Sl N0. <36 :9$' / 2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENT VERSUS Ku. S.K. Shrivastava 3/o. Shri B. L.Shrivastava 'Aged about59 years, R/o Dawara Colony, Pachpedi Naka Raipur, (C.G.) Wbi-king as a Assistant Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project Dharsiwa-1; District Raipur, (C.G.) State ofChhattisgarh thrQugh the Secrefary, DepaFtmenfof wQmen, Child Development artd Social Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, C.G.. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTIGLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ROR ISSUANCE OF^^^^W MANDAMOUS. CERTITIORAY. OR DlRECTION OF l-IKE NATURE 5^^U U^ S F" ^l- ^~7L<- W*»CTI 9»*tl<»i ~S^'^wvf<i, w'^wi'o, hviwy. ^..uKy..^:-M.z^% 311^1'TWC'^f^P^?) sii^t'wR-fi'* wr an^i siitjffi wnwdfwsnt^ Shri Vimilesh Bajpai couns^i for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Thi Thakur PL for the respond^its/State. Limited point raised by th^ petitioner is that though she is ^oing to retire on 20.S.2010 y^t she has been transferred vide impugned order dated 29.6.2009.1 Counsei for the petitipner s^ibmits that even as par the transfer po.'icy the petitioner ought not to ^ave been transferred at ths's stage. Counsel for fhe responi concerned which would be decid proposition of the State counsei, concerned. Accordingiy, the petition is the petitioner makes a represen' within a period of 10 days from order, the authorities concerne^ further period of three weeks frorrj *. •*ilii"l4!-f tiiKdl' ^fs^<T<»^K ^•sffTO.sn^r kur Dy. AG with Shri Shashank ents/State submits that let the petitioner rnake a suitabie r^presentation to the authorities ^d in accordance with iaw. To this 1 counss! for the petjtioner showed ^ his agreement. However, he pra^'s for an inferim protection tJJI ths representation of the petifionej' is decided by the authorities ^.f |disposed of with a direction thaf if lation to the authorities concerned jihe date of receipt of copy of thls shal! decide the same vi/ithin a the date of its rsceipt. Til! then the order impugned shafl be kept in ^beyance so far as it relates to the petitioner. Pritinker Diwaker Judgc ^r^ts^^ ^ft^r(ra^m^—FS/95—11/2008—i,oo,ooo. w