IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 3RD OCTOBER 2008 / 11TH ASWINA 1930 W.P(C).No. 29269 of 2008(H) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ P.B. PADMAJA, H.S.A. (MUSIC), GOVERNMENT H.S.S., THRIKODITHANAM, CHANGANACHERRY. BY ADV. SRI.S.JAYAKRISHNAN SMT.S.USHAKUMARI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRENSENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOTTAYAM. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 29269 OF 2008 (H) = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 3rd day of October 2008 J U D G M E N T Though the petitioner is challenging Ext. P8, an order passed by the Director of Public Instructions, exercising his revisional power against Ext. P6, I do not think that an examination of the merits of the controversy is called for. This is for the reason that Ext. P9 revision filed against Ext. P8 order of the D.P.I. is pending consideration of the 1st respondent. If that be so, it is for the 1st respondent to examine Ext. P9 and pass final orders in this matter. This, the 1st respondent shall do, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 3 months of production of a copy of this judgment. 2. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-