IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-29730 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 15.11.2010 Bira Ram ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Malik, A.A.G., Haryana. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned State counsel has pointed out that the instant petition for quashing the FIR (Annexure P-1), on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2), is not maintainable, in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case Manoj Sharma v. State & Ors 2008(4) RCR (Criminal) 827 and of this Court in Criminal Misc. No.M-29561 of 2010 titled as Jitender and others v. State of Haryana and another decided on 08.10.2010. 2. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner intends to withdraw the present petition. 3. In this view of the matter, the instant petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Needless to say that the petitioner would be at liberty to bring the compromise on the record and the trial Court will consider the same in accordance with law. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) November 15, 2010 Judge naresh.k