CW 14355/09 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14355/09 Radha Devi Meena Versus State & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 25/11/2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Pramod Thakwani, for petitioner *** Counsel submits that petitioner along with respondent no.5 Geeta Meena, both of them had participated in the selection process initiated by the respondents while holding selection for the post of Anganwadi Karyakarta. Petitioner is qualified in all respect and her name was recommended by the committee constituted for the purpose, but finally respondent no.5 Geeta Meena was appointed on the premise that she is holding qualification of 8th pass. However, copy of representation placed on record, made by her to Child Development Project Officer, Chaksu, Jaipur informing that she submitted her mark-sheet of 6th standard and if any interpolation has been made, it is by someone else and not by her own. Counsel submits that on the basis of qualification, she could not have been appointed as Anganwadi Karyakarta and despite petitioner made a complaint, no one has examined the same and which is causing great hardship to her. CW 14355/09 [2] Without going into merits of the matter at this stage, this court considers it appropriate to direct the petitioner to make a fresh representation. If it is made, the District Collector, Jaipur may consider her grievance independtly after affording opportunity of hearing to respondent no.5 Geeta Meena as well and may decide the same within three months, thereafter, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Decision whereof be communicated to the petitioner, who if feels aggrieved, will be free to avail remedy under law. With the above directions & observations, writ petition stands disposed of. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA14355CW09 25-11.doc