IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2011 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 OP(C).No. 4053 of 2011(O) ------------------------------------- OS.692/2009 OF SUB COURT, PARAVUR .................... PETITIONER ------------------ PURUSHAN, AGED 75 YEARS, S/O. LATE KESHAVAN, PANTHITHARA HOUSE, NJARAKKAL VILLAGE, NJARAKKAL, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.VETTATH EAPEN MATHAI RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- USHA, AGED 62 YEARS, W/O. LATE DHARMAPALAN, PANIKASHERIL HOUSE, MAITHALA VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK-680 664. BY THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/12/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs OP(C).No. 4053 of 2011(O) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN THE SUIT i.e. O.S. NO. 692/2009 FILED BEFORE THE LEARNED SUB COURT PARAVUR. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BY THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY WITH WHICH THE RESPONDENT CHEATED THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------- O.P(C).No.4053 of 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this 13th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.11 of 2011 of the Court of learned Sub Judge, Paravur. That is a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale allegedly executed by the respondent in favour of petitioner. Petitioner claims to have paid `.5,50,000/- by way of advance but, respondent neither executed the sale deed nor returned the advance. Learned counsel submits that the case is being delayed though it was filed in the year 2009. It is submitted that though the matter was taken before the Adalath, nothing transpired. Hence this original petition seeking direction for early disposal. 2. Without understanding the volume of work of the Court concerned and proceedings to be taken in the suit, no direction for time bound disposal could be issued. The suit is of the year 2009 and having regard to the grievance of petitioner, learned Sub Judge is directed to dispose of the suit as early as possible. O.P(C).No.4053 of 2011 -: 2 :- Resultantly this original petition is disposed of directing learned Sub Judge, Paravur to expedite the steps and dispose of the suit as early as possible. (THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE) Sbna/-