IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2008 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1929 RP.No. 263 of 2008(J) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.19206/2007 Dated 01/01/2008 .................... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN WP(C): ------------------------------------------- 1. P. MOHANAN, SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS(RETD), "LINI NIVAS", CHAVASSERI P.O., KANNUR-670 702. 2. C. MOHANAN, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SURVEY (RETD), VIGI NIVAS, MUTTANNUR, EDAYANNUR P.O., KANNUR-670 595. 3. A. SIVAKRISHNAN, DEPUTY DIRECTOR (RETD.), COLLECTORATE, KASARAGOD, RUDRAKSHAM, THALIYIL, KALLIASSERI. 4. A.V. BALAKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (RETD), OFFICE OF THE RE-SURVEY, KASARAGOD, SREYAS, NETTAMALOOR,PUZHALI. 5. M. BALAKRISHNAN, HEAD SURVEYOR (RETD), COLLECTORATE, KANNUR, DILSHA, NIYARKUNNAV L.P. SCHOOL, ALVAIL. BY ADV. SMT.I.SHEELA DEVI RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS IN WP(C): ---------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E), ACCOUNTANT GENERAL'S OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DIRECTOR OF SURVEY & LAND RECORDS, DIRECTORATE OF SURVEY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT.PLEADER SHRI BEJOY CHANDRANS THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- R.P. 263/2008 in W.P.(C).19206/2007 -------------------- Dated this the 12th day of March, 2008 ORDER I do not find any basis for the apprehension expressed by the learned counsel for the petitioners that this Court had not specifically quashed the individual orders in relation to the writ petitioners, respondents are likely to pass the same order as was impugned in the writ petition. 2. I heard Special Government Pleader Mr. Manoj also. 3. In my view, operative portion of the directions issued in the judgment are clear. This Court has also declared the entitlement of the petitioners to the actual benefit of the revision of scale of pay. This Court has further declared that the conditions contained in Ext.P13 shall not be enforced against the Petitioners. I do not find any ground to review the judgment as such. Subject to the clarification as mentioned above, Review Petition is disposed of. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs