1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 873/2008 (Babu Lal & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 26/02/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Devendra Mehalana for the petitioners. Mr. J.P.S.Choudhary, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and challan papers. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that injured Jagdish suffered two injuries by sharp edged weapon and those injuries have been assigned to co-accused Sarjeet and Pappu who were said to have been armed with Sword and Gandashi respectively. So far as the present petitioners are concerned, they are said to have been armed with lathis but no injury has been caused by blunt. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the case of the present petitioners is distinguishable from that of co-accused Sarjeet and Pappu as there is no injury by blunt to injured Jagdish, without commenting on the merit of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Babu Lal S/o Sh. Chhanu 2 Ram and Kishori Lal @ Chunni Lal S/o Sh. Gyana Ram @ Chhanu Ram be released on bail in FIR No. 472/2007 P.S. Raisinghnagar, district Sri Ganganagar, provided each of them executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP