IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12533 of 2009 SHATRUDHAN YADAV @ MURLI YADAV @ KUKKU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 23.6.2009 Heard. The petitioner is an accused in a case under section 364/34 of the I.P.C. and section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant named him in his subsequent statement. He further submits that some of the persons who have been named in the subsequent statement, namely, Vijay Yadav, Kallu Yadav, Mithilesh Yadav @ Choru Yadav and Mogal Yadav, have been allowed bail by different benches of this Court. Co-accused, Vijai Yadav, after remaining in custody for more than 1½ years has been allowed bail. Mogal Yadav after remaining in custody for more than one year and one month had been allowed bail. The petitioner had surrendered on 21.11.2008. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. Anilkrsinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)