IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.612 of 2011 Date of Decision : January 14, 2011. Vijay Kumar Garg .....Petitioner versus The Punjab State Warehousing Corporation and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vivek Sethi, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner being aggrieved by the recovery order dated 24th September, 2008 (Annexure P-15) passed by the respondent- Corporation, has preferred a departmental appeal on 4th December, 2008 (Annexure P-16) which needs to be decided by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors, namely, respondent No.2. The petitioner's grievance is that more than 2 years have already passed but the appeal is still pending consideration. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to the Appellate C.W.P.No .612 of 2011 2 Authority-respondent No.2 to decide the petitioner's appeal preferably by giving him an opportunity of personal hearing and by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. January 14, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE