-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 536 OF 2007 Ganesh J. Kasle.... .... .... Petitioner. Versus M/s.Colortronic Film Lab...... .... Respondent. Mr. P.M.Patel for the Petitioner. Mr. P. M. Palshikar for the Respondent. CORAM : V. C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V. C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V. C. DAGA, J. DATED : 12TH MARCH, 2007. DATED : 12TH MARCH, 2007. DATED : 12TH MARCH, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: Heard learned Counsel appearing for the rival parties. Perused the impugned order and the petition. 2. Having heard parties, I am of the considered view that the view taken by the Tribunal in the impugned order is a reasonable and plausible view and the finding recorded by the Tribunal are legal and cannot be said to be perverse. This Court, while sitting in writ jurisdiction, is not expected to reappreciate the evidence, facts and circumstances of the case unless appreciation done by the Tribunal is found to be perverse. No such case is made out. -: 2 :- 3. In the result, this writ petition is, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. Sd/- (V. C. DAGA, J.) (V. C. DAGA, J.) (V. C. DAGA, J.)