IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 20TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 29TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23244 of 2011(E) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ D.SREEDHARAN, PROGRAMME CO-ORDINATOR (RETIRED), SCHOOL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. BY SRI.BABU VARGHESE, SENIOR ADVOCATE, BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON T. JOHN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 560. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILLS P.O. KOTTAYAM-686 560. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. T.A.SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.23244/2011 E APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF COMMON JUDGMENT DATED 14/3/2007 IN WPC.NO.35976/04 AND 1973 OF 2005. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE/COMPLAINT DATED 16/11/2007. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF UNIVERSITY ORDER DATED 5/5/2001. EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PORTION OF THE ORDER OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT DATED 6/10/2008 PASSED IN I.A.34/2008 IN COC.1191 OF 2007. EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(P)NO.186/2002/H.EDN. DATED 28/12/2002. EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY THE REGISTRAR OF THE UNIVERSITY DATED 23/4/93 DECLINING PERMISSION TO VISIT BHARATHIYAR UNIVERSITY. EXHIBIT P7: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 23/9/1997 ISSUED BY THE ARC OF MONTGOMERY COUNTRY, MARYLAND U.S.A. EXHIBIT P8: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 19/11/1997 ISSUED BY THE KINGS WOOD MENTAL HEALTH CENTRE, U.K. EXHIBIT P9: TRUE COPY OF CERTIFICATE DATED 3/7/1997 ISSUED BY THE VICE-CHANCELLOR. EXHIBIT P10: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 13/1/2009 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE VICE CHANCELLOR. EXHIBIT P10(A):TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 7/11/2009 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE VICE CHANCELLOR. EXHIBIT P11: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 7/5/2009 SENT BY THE UNIVERSITY. EXHIBIT P12: TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 3/8/2011 GIVEN BY THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER OF THE UNIVERSITY. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 23244 of 2011-E - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of September, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the delay in granting various benefits which have been accrued to him based on the directions issued by this Court. As per Ext.P1 judgment this Court directed the University to grant various benefits after granting a declaration that the petitioner is entitled for the scale of pay of teaching faculty and he is entitled to be paid arrears for the break in period along with other service benefits. A period of four months was granted by the said judgment. 2. It appears that the petitioenr thereafter filed C.O.(C) No.1191/2007 which was disposed of after recording the submission made by the respondent that the directions contained in the judgment will be complied with. According to the petitioenr, even thereafter the directions have not been complied with. 3. In tune with the directions issued by this Court, the University has taken final steps in the matter and finally by Ext.P11 the Registrar of the University directed the petitioner to furnish the self appraisal report for the concerned period and other relevant documents required for the wpc 23244/2011 2 consideration of the grade promotion, as requested by the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that he has already submitted the self appraisal report to the University. The petitioner was waiting for further action in the matter and he obtained information under the Right to Information Act as per Ext.P12 that the self appraisal report has been sent to the expert for evaluation and the opinion is yet to be received. The same is dated 3.8.2011. Seeking for appropriate directions in the matter, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 2. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the University, who submitted that the action will be finalised if some more time is granted by this Court. Exts.P10 and P10(a) are the detailed representations filed by the petitioner. 3. Therefore, there will be a direction to the respondents to take appropriate action and finalise the same and the eligible benefits will be disbursed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/