IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16252 of 2009 RAJEEV KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. No doubt the allegation levelled against the petitioner could not find support in course of investigation, so final form was submitted even then basing the complaint cum protest cognizance is taken that could be taken to allow him on bail but at the same time in paragraph-5 of the petition, petitioner has been shown 16 years old, a juvenile who is more privileged but that is possible only after assessment of his age by the court where the case is pending (Sri S.N.Shivhare, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bettiah (West Champaran) in Complaint Case No. 1714C of 2008) and thereafter the relief granted by the Juvenile Justice Board. So the petitioner is directed to choose the proper forum. With the aforesaid observation, the prayer for anticipatory bail made on behalf - 2 - of the petitioner is rejected. It is made clear that whenever the bail is sought that shall be decided on its own merit on the same day without being prejudiced by the present rejection order. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI