IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16715 of 2009 NAVIN KUMAR JHA Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 20.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is alleged for not depositing the whole premium amount received from complainant’s husband, rather only Rs. 60,000/- was deposited from Rs. 1,02,061/-. His further submission is that it was the complainant, who was to deposit the premium but not through this petitioner and for the same cause, another case is lodged in the consumer forum by the son and the petitioner is apprehending his arrest for his no fault. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Trial No. 1391 of 2009 arising out of Complaint Case No. 2623 of 2006, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Ram Surat, J.M., Ist Class, Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)