In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 5216 of 2008 (O&M) Surinder Kaur and another ..... Petitioners vs Ram Kumar and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R. C. Kapoor, Advocate, for respondent no. 3. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the order passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Yamuna Nagar, dated 8.9.2008, whereby the application filed by the petitioners for release of amount of compensation which was directed to be deposited in the FDR, has been rejected. Briefly, the facts are that on account of death of son of the petitioners, in an award dated 19.2.2008, passed by the Lok Adalat at Yamuna Nagar, the compensation was assessed at Rs. 3,10,000/-. The same was directed to deposited in a FDR for a period of one year. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the FDR is to expire on 24.5.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the amount in question is required by the petitioners for solemnizing the marriage of their daughter who is of marriageable age. It has not been pleaded that the marriage has already been fixed. Merely because she is of marriageable age is not a good reason to direct the Bank to encash the FDR prematurely. The FDR is otherwise going to expire on 24.5.2009. Accordingly, at this stage I do not find any reason to direct the Bank to encash the FDR and make payment to the petitioners. The petition is dismissed. However, it is made clear that in case the date of marriage of the petitioners' daughter is fixed before the maturity date of FDR, the petitioners shall be at liberty to move a fresh application before the Tribunal. 9.1.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge