IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2008 / 31ST ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 3247 of 2006(J) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ N.PARAMESWARAN, S/O.NATARAJAN, AGED 42 YEARS, MEMBER NO.276, PERUVEMBA WEAVERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY F 1608, KALLENCHIRA, PERUVAMBA.P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVT., DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE KERALA STATE HANDLOOM WEAVERS SOCIETY LTD. (HANTEX), NO.H 232, TRIVANDRUM, P.O.BOX NO.64, TRIVANDRUM, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT. 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA HANDLOOM WEAVERS SOCIETY LTD. (HANTEX) NO.H232, TRIVANDRUM, P.O.BOX NO.64, TRIVANDRUM. 4. S.PRAKASH, GENERAL MANAGER, HANTEX PROCESS HOUSE, PARAPPANAMCODE. 5. P.VALSARAJ, GARMENT MANAGER, HANTEX INTERNATIONAL GARMENT UNIT, TRIVANDRUM. 6. K.BASKARAN, REGIONAL MANAGER HANTEX (UNDER SUSPENSION) NOW RESIDING AT PANJAJANYAM, KUNDUVARA ROAD, CHHEMBUKAVU.P.O, TRICHUR. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.K.RAVIKRISHNAN R2, R3 BY ADV. SRI. M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SC HANDEX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Rs/ THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.3247 of 2006-J = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2008. JUDGMENT The private respondents are employees of HANTEX. The petitioner is the member of one of the primary societies under the HANTEX. He filed this writ petition stating that the private respondents are not proceeded against appropriately on charges of indiscipline. HANTEX is an apex society bound by rules and regulations framed, as also the provisions of the Kerala Co- operative Societies Act, 1969. No interim orders were issued in this case. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances, at this point of time, I do not see the necessity for any writ being issued at the instance of a member of a primary co- operative society to govern the matters relating WP(C)3247/2006 -: 2 :- to discipline of officers in the service of the apex society. No ground exists. Therefore, notwithstanding the fact that notices have not been served on the private respondents, this writ petition is dismissed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/230708