IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40095 of 2010 NEERAJ KUMAR @ NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH . Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU.C.B.I. . ----------- 02/ 09-Nov-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused persons is to the effect that they had submitted forged and fraudulent papers to obtain loans from the bank in question. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that some of the co-accused were granted liberty by this Court to deposit the entire dues for availing privilege of bail. Learned counsel for the CBI submits that in similar circumstances anticipatory bail of another co- accused, Anand Kishore has been dismissed on 09.10.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Anand Kishore was also given liberty to deposit the dues but he failed to do so and therefore his prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected. Be that as it may, this application for anticipatory bail is disposed of with observation that if the petitioner 2 surrenders within eight weeks and deposits one third of the amount due against him i.e., approximately 5 Lacs, in that event, he, NEERAJ KUMAR @ NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH shall be enlarged on provisional bail for a period of three months from the date of surrender in connection with Special Case No. 17/08 (RC 23 (A) 08) pending in the court of Special Judge, CBI, South Bihar at Patna. If the petitioner deposits the entire remaining dues within a further period of three months from the date of provisional bail, in that event, his bail shall be confirmed otherwise, provisional bail shall be cancelled and petitioner shall be taken into custody. It goes without saying that the concerned bank shall accept the deposit offered by the petitioner in compliance of this order. One of the bailors must be father of the petitioner who has sworn affidavit in support of this application. perwez ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)