:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2511 OF 2006 TO CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2518 OF 2006 Nandkumar Balabhau Bhoir. ...Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ...Respondent. Mr.M.B.Shirsat for the Applicant. Mr. K.V.Saste, APP. for the State in Cri. Application Nos. 2511/2006 to 2514/2006. Mr. Y.S.Shinde,APP. for the State in Criminal Application Nos. 2515/2006 to 2518/2006. CORAM : R.S.MOHITE,J. DATED : 12.7.2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. These applications are filed by the applicant Nandkumar Bhoir for anticipatory bail. The applicant is shown as an accused in C.R.Nos. 213/2004, 137/2004, 397/2005, 312/2005, 36/2005, 9/2006, 23/2005 and 597/2005 registered by Karad Police Station, Pune Gramin (Khed) Police Station, Kalyan Police Station, Dombivali Police Station, Rasayani Police Station, Kudal Police Station, Ratnagiri Police Station and Thane Naupada Police Station respectively for alleged offences under Section-409 and 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3 of The Maharashtra Protection :2: of Investors and Depositors Act. The allegation is that the applicant was one of the Director of the company by name Adhunik Grihanirman Vittiya Corporation Ltd. The said company had played fraud upon investors and defalcated the monies of the investors. It is sought to be argued that the applicant was appointed as Collection-in-Charge in the year 2000 and later on appointed as Temporary Divisional Manager. It appears that the name of the present applicant is mentioned as Director in Form No.32. It is sought to be argued that the Sessions Court has granted anticipatory bail to the applicant in other matters. Those orders are not annexed. The A.P.P.states that the investigation is in progress and defalcated monies are to be recovered. In my view, not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, all the applications are rejected. 2. It is made clear that the observations made in this order will not come in the way of the applicant in case he prays for regular bail. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)