IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2008 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1930 LA.App..No. 1159 of 2007(D) --------------------------- LAR.20/2003 of SUB COURT, CHERTHALA .................... APPELLANT: RESPONDENT NO.1 -------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SPL. TAHSILDAR (LA) INDUSTRIAL CENTRE, CHERTHALA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.SHYSON P.MANGUZHA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. GANGADHARAN CHANDRASELHARAN, KANATTU, K.R.PURAM,PALLIPPURAM. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.I.D.C. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI FOR R.2 SRI.SIJU RAJAN FOR R.2 SRI.C.K.SAJEEV FOR R1 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON I.A.NO.2950 OF 2007 IN LAA NO.1159 OF 2007 DISMISSED. 18.6.2008 SD/- PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L.A.A.No.1159 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 18th June, 2008 JUDGMENT This appeal is preferred by the Government against the judgment and decree of the Sub Court, Cherthala in LAR No.20/03. It is brought to my notice that the requisitioning authority, the K.S.I.D.C. preferred appeal against the impugned judgment as well as similar judgments in other cases relating to the very same acquisition and the Division Bench of this court by a common judgment dated 24.3.2006 (LAA No.664/05 and connected cases) remanded all the cases back to the reference court. It is reported by the learned counsel for the requisitioning authority that after remand this reference was closed by the reference court on the reason that the claimant did not enter appearance. Whatever that be, in view of the obvious position that the impugned judgment was set aside and the matter was remanded by the Division Bench of this court, the present appeal is dismissed as unnecessary. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE