IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6700 of 2011 MD. HAMIM SHAH @ HAMIM SHAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 147, 323, 342, 379, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has not married with the complainant. A statement has been made in para 8 of the petition that complainant is married with one Md. Ziyaur Rahman, S/O Md. Taha, R/O Village and P.O. Dehti, P.S. Palasi, District- Araria and the marriage certificate has been brought on the record as Annexure 5 to the petition. Considering the fact that the marriage itself is in question, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the - 2 - like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Araria, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1317 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Bhardwaj ( Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)