HIGH COURT OF OdHATTIMH AT 3W W. P.($) No. 1590 of 2007. Ramdayal Panday, S/o 5.L. Pandey, Aged abouf 35 Assistant Teacher Adwa'n‘ 5chool Jwdnr Nagw Block-Sarargwh 'Disit aigarh [C-5-l Petitioner 1 . State of Chhaitisgwh hrough:- Secrefary Tribal Welfa'e Department, D.K.v5i Bhman, Rdp (C.G.) . The Directorftbiic instruction; D'.K.$. wmm, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Joint Director; Public Instruction Division, Raigath (C.G.) i .’ Assistant Commissaom Tribai Welfore Depmmem mm. nagwh c.e.) 5. District Education Offiaer Distt. Ram-h [cm 6. Block Education Offiozr mock samgarh Dim. Raga-h [m SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present: Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. e Mr. Vinoy Pandey, Palei Lawyer for 5t¢rtelrespondents. ORDEk (Passed on this 19‘“ Day of March, 2007) 1. The question of ion involved herein osto mother the petitioner is entitled to regulw pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or. from the date of completion of probation period. Learned counsel oppew'ing for the petitioner as-well as for the state/respondents jointly stbmit thot R T w 2 4 ( ] @ Th2 facts and qucsiion of [an involved me mt writ petition are the same fa ihaf of in W. P. (S) No. 7240/2006 (Ku Neel Kuwm Ekka vs. State of awhaffisgmh & others), which «m disposed of Vida order-dated 03.01.2007. ' In View of the above-stated stbmissions made by learned counsel for tho parties, the writ petition is- disposed of in the sane terms. No order as to ‘ costs. l Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge Subhosh .