IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr.Misc. M 22435 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:17.8.2011 Darshan Singh Bhatia ..... Petitioner vs State of Haryana .... Respondent Present:- Mr. P.S. Sullar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, D.A.G. Haryana. M.M.S.BEDI, J. The petitioner alongwith his co-accused had allegedly induced complainant to part with money with a promise that complainant and her husband would be send abroad. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not named in the complaint which has been converted into an FIR as per Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C to have received any money. Main allegations are against Rajneesh Malik. The petitioner was named by one of the co-accused while in custody. The authenticity of the statement of co-accused would be debatable. Without expression of any opinion on merits of the case, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court. 17.08.2011 (M.M.S. Bedi) rajeev Judge