IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No. 623 OF 2008 Harsh Bardhan Singh Rawat and another. …Petitioners. Versus Union of India and others. ……...Respondents. Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. V.P. Bahuguna, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Advocate for respondent nos.4 to 6. Date of Decision : 29.7.2010 Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3, having sought instructions, states that the construction of the road from Tanakpur to Twaghat, including the widening thereof has been completed approximately to the extent of 80 per cent, and that the remaining part of the project will be completed positively by 31.12.2010. 2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3, we are satisfied that the instant Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous. The same is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Needless to mention that the undertaking given to this Court by the learned counsel representing respondent nos. 1 to 3 shall be binding on them, and that they shall complete the entire project by 31.12.2010. 3. The instant Writ Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 29.07.2010 Rathour