1 crap464.06 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 464 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 463 OF 2006 Pravin s/o Nemichand Sancheti ...Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & anr. ...Respondents ..... Shri D.S.Manorkar, advocate h/f Shri S.G.Laddha, advocate for applicant Smt. Y.M.Kshirsagar, A.P.P. for Respondent no.1 Shri A.J.Bhatta h/f Shri Dinesh Vakil, advocate for Resp. No.2 ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 19th December, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Heard respective learned counsel for the parties. 2 At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, leave granted to amend the number of days delay in the present application. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2 crap464.06 3 This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 15 days caused in filing the accompanying application seeking leave to file appeal. 4 For the reasons stated in the present application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily. Moreover, it also appears that the delay caused does not appear to be willful, deliberate or intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 5 In the result, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 15 days caused in filing the accompanying application stands condoned and present Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap464.06