IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 7429 of 2008 Between: 1 Gogireddy Ramireddy S/o. Kondareddy R/o. Nagineniprolu Reddypalem, Burgampahad (M), Khammam Dist. 2 Gogireddy Venkatareddy S/o. Kondareddy R/o. Nagineniprolu Reddypalem, Burgampahad (M), Khammam Dist. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Tahsildar, Burgampahad (M), Burgampahad, Khamma Dist. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palawancha, Khammam Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in highhandedly interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property situated in Survey No. 372/AA to an extent of Acres 6-61 gts, situated at Nagineniprolu Reddypalem Village, Burghampahad Mandal, Khammam Dsitrict, in spite of appeal is pendingt before the Prl.Senior Civil Judge, Kothagudem, Khamma District and obtaining staus-quo orders in I.A.No.1350 of 2006 in A.S.No.29 of 2006 dated 23-10-2006 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently declare that the petitioners are entitled to continue their possession and enjoyment of the Suit scheduled property till the disposal of the A.S D.No. 29 of 2006 on the ﬁle of the Prl.Senior Civil Judge, Kothgudem, Khammma District. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.V.RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.24.10.2008 msv