Criminal Revision No. 1904 of 2011 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 1904 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.08.2011 Harbans Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. S.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... RAJESH BINDAL, J. The grouse raised by the petitioner, who is the complainant in the FIR, is that the application filed by the prosecution under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning respondent Nos. 2 and 3, namely, Paramjit Kaur and Tarwinder Singh as additional accused has been dismissed by the learned court below without appreciating the material on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the apprehension is that dismissal of the application filed by the prosecution for summoning of the accused, at this stage, will debar the petitioner from filing application for summoning the additional accused at any subsequent stage when more material in evidence comes before the court as they were involved in the crime. Even at the time of passing of order framing charges against the accused it had been mentioned by the learned court below that all the accused along with co-accused Tarwinder Singh, who is yet to be arrested, were members of unlawful assembly and further that they had committed murder intentionally. He further submitted that even the interim bail application filed by Tarwinder Singh, was dismissed by the learned court below on June 06, 2011. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, in my opinion, the apprehension is totally misconceived. The application for summoning 1 Criminal Revision No. 1904 of 2011 additional accused can be filed at any stage, which is to be considered on the basis of material which comes before the court till that date. The rejection of the application filed by the prosecution, at this stage, for summoning additional accused will not debar the petitioner from filing application at any subsequent stage in case sufficient material comes before the court for summoning of additional accused. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 24.08.2011 sharmila 2