CRP 258/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Mr. S.Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with section 115 of the CPC is directed against the order dated 22.6.2011 p assed by the learned Munsiff No.1, Kamrup, Guwahati, in T.S.No.30/2010 rejecting the petitioner’s prayer to call for the official witnesses by issuing summons. The aforesaid rejection order was passed on the ground that the plaintiff/petiti oner did not furnish the names and designations of the official witnesses in the list submitted by her. Mr. Chauhan, learned counsel has drawn the attention of this cou rt to the application filed by the petitioner under Order XVI read with section 151 of the CPC. I have gone through the aforesaid application. No doubt, the na me of any official witness/officer has been furnished, but the plaintiff wanted to call for the official witnesses/officers from the officer of the Senior Sub-R egistrar, Kamrup, Guwahati with certain documents/volumes and thumb impression b ooks and record of case No.225m/1997 for proving her case. It is submitted by Mr . Chauhan that since the petitioner wanted to prove her case from the official r ecords, it is not necessary to mention the names of the officers. Moreover, he s ubmits that since in the earlier order dated 23rd September,2004, the learned tr ial court has allowed issuing of summons to official witnesses, there is no gro und for refusing issuance of summons to concerned official witnesses/officers fr om the office of the Senior Sub-Registrar, Kamrup, Guwahati. The Title Suit has been filed for declaration of right, title an d interest, confirmation of possession and permanent injunction and for establis hment of plaintiff’s right, title and interest. It is obvious that the official records of the Senior Sub-Registrar would be required to be produced by the off icial witnesses/officers and the said officials/officers concerned should be mad e available for examination as witnesses before the court. I am of the considered view that the names of the officers conce rned is not material and it may not be mentioned in the application. What is req uired is summoning of official from the Sub-Registrar Office to produce and prov e the relevant documents. In view of the above, the impugned order dated 22.6.11 passed by the learned Munsiff No.1, Kamrup, Guwahati in Title Suit No.30/2010 stands quas hed and set aside. The learned Munsiff No.1, Kamrup, Guwahati shall issue the su mmons to the Senior Sub-Registrar, Kamrup, Guwahati along with the documents and materials mentioned in the list. The revision petition stands allowed.