THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No.17067 of 2008 06.8.2008 Between K.Joy Krupamani, D/o.K.Y.Charles … Petitioner and The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Registrar (Administration), Hyderabad And others … Respondents THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No.17067 of 2008 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble VVSRJ) Petitioner impugnes the proceedings of second respondent dated 03.1.2008, whereby and whereunder inter alia petitioner was retired with eﬀect from 31.7.2008, on attaining age of superannuation. Petitioner alleges that her Date of Birth (DoB) is 12.7.1958, which was accordingly entered in service record. In 1996 during audit of District Court, it was pointed out that DoB was altered as 12.7.1950 and that there was no attestation of such alteration. Therefore, learned District Judge by communication dated 15.11.1996, directed petitioner to produce certiﬁcate showing her correct DoB. She did not do so. Again, on 08.1.1997, a reminder was sent to petitioner to produce certiﬁcate showing correct DoB. Petitioner allegedly submitted her Transfer Certiﬁcate (TC) issued by Arya Girls High School, Warangal, showing her DoB as 12.7.1958. This was enquired into with said School, which appears to have sent a certiﬁcate supporting petitioner’s contention. She further alleges that no proper steps were taken for restoring DoB to its original position, but impugned orders were passed informing that she would retire on 31.7.2008. We have heard learned Counsel for petitioner, who tried to impress upon us that DoB 12.7.1958 was corrected without notice to petitioner and therefore the same cannot be basis for superannuating her. Secondly he submits that even after petitioner submitted TC issued by Arya Girls High School, Warangal, learned District Judge did not take any action, and therefore, present impugned order is arbitrary. There cannot be any doubt that petitioner is aware that her DoB was altered as 12.7.1950 at least in 1996. She did not submit certiﬁcate showing her correct DoB for a period of one month necessitating issue of another communication by District Judge. Allegedly the same was enquired into, in which the School sent report in favour of petitioner. If learned District Judge did not pass orders thereon, nothing prevented petitioner to approach High Court on administrative side. She did not do so. She waited till issue of proceedings dated 03.1.2008 and approached this Court belatedly. Her submission that the said proceedings were received by her only in June 2008 cannot be accepted because she had been very much working in the unit. In this background, we are not inclined to adjudicate the matter at this stage except narrating factual background as above. If so advised, petitioner may make a representation to High Court on administrative side, which we hope will be considered expeditiously. In this writ petition, she cannot be entitled to any relief. The writ petition, with the above observations, is dismissed. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) ___________________ August 06, 2008 (G.CHANDRAIAH, J) YS