^•s^^^. •^i^^ :^.:1''':^:" KffiMBKgtSgBKISIK MSSsSSSsSlsS^W ;-'::^K':;XS®it%^?t^^^^^^; f:1::1'' SBBBSflUIS 6BFORE WE: U-.?»SI^E'a,]MINISTR^TIVE'TRIB(»H&I»•A^iJ,ftB&£60fi; SK O.A.HQ. Q^: yls9s Vj.vekanand Chandralcer aged 30 yrs, Shri Ra n aatan Qiandrakar,, Mireless attend- ant (labour) 0/0 Executive Engineer, Water-Resources .Oepartaient Kawardtia, Bivision,Kawar<Sia,Qi.stt-Rajnandgaon, S/o Madhpara .Kuwardha.Distt-Rajnandgaon. v e r s u s -Appiicant 'i'^y^ybftt.l^Cr^ I.State of H.P.through ttie Secretary, Water Resources Depannent,Wllabb- Bhawan• Z.'-b.lef Engineer^iabanadi Goadawari, Kachtiar Water Rssources D^ianbnent, . Ratpur. . 3,13 uperintending Engineer, Water Resources Departinent, Shivnath Mandal^turg. 4.Executiv®Enginer, W»terResources Oeparfnent, KawardbatOivisisn^Kawardha Oistt-Rajaanc^aoa. Respondents •APPLIC&TION ONCBR SECTION 19 BF 'SIS AZMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ACT, 1985 EETAII-S OP 'IHE APPLIC&.TIONs l.Particulgrs of the applicants 2,Particulars of th'e respondents; As above, AS above, S.iPar'-icalars o£ the order against wtilch the application fees i.)Against the order dt. •ww^'faMws.tST;.- ^, !:;•"-<.;(. ••.'•'r^'' ^\ //"^ ''% ^%., •-^IS^ j ;?ls ;IA HIGH CQURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPUCANT WRIT PETITION CS) No.ll79of: Vivekanand Chaiidraker. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofM.P. & Othsrs. APPLICATION LWDER SECTION 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 SB: Hon'Ue Shri Satish K. Agiuhotri. J. Present: Shri Sanjay Patel, Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Sliri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDERrORAL) (Passed on Z1 day ofOctober, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that tlie petitioner inay be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a reoresentation to the authorities to consider his case in accordance with the circular dated 05 March, 2008 as the petitioner was appointed in fhe year 1989 and his services were terminated on 03 Sqitember, 1995 (Annexure A/l). However, the tennination order was stayed by this Court on 16th February, 2000. 2. Shri Thakur, leanied Deputy Advocate General appearmg for the State/respondents submits that in tfae event, a representation is made, the sani.e shall be considered in aecordance with law in its own merits, wifhin a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 3. Iu view ofthe foregoiiig, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty and observations. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge teii