IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18562 of 2009 SUNITA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 18.11.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking bail in a case instituted under sections 329,201 and 120B/34 IPC. This matter was earlier taken up. Learned APP was requested to go through the case diary. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that apart from the strong suspicion, there is no tangible material on record that may incriminate the petitioner in the offence. It is contended that the petitioner is a lady and, as such, she enjoys certain special attention/privilege in terms of section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is next contended that she is in custody since 20th of February,2009. Learned APP, on perusal of the case diary, submits that in the paragraphs referred to and relied upon in the impugned order strong suspicion has been raised against the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner abovenamed be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM, Patna City in connection with Malsalami p.s.case no.35/02, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors - 2 - shall be her own/close family member and no sooner the charges are framed in the case the petitioner shall appear on each date fixed at the trial. In case of default in appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel her bail bonds. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )