IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 22ND MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 36727 of 2007(V) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ P.MOHAMMED JUNAIS, S/O. AHAMMEDKUTTY, PATTANI HOUSE, MANNARMALA P.O., PIN-679 325. BY ADVS. MR.T.K.AJITH KUMAR, MR.P.VINODKUMAR, MR.SUSHANTH.J. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., MELATTOOR BRANCH, MALAPPURAM DIST., PIN-679 325, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. AUTHORISED OFFICER, (GENERAL MANAGER), MALAPPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 505. R1 BY MR.U.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE, BY ADV.MR.P.V.LOHITHAKSHAN, SMT.P.VIJAYAMMA, SMT.UMA GOPINATH, MR.V.KRISHNA MENON, MR.DEVIDAS.U.K. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.36727 OF 2007 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner seeks to challenge a notice issued under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act. Though notice on admission was issued, no interim order was granted in this case. Having perused the materials on record, the plea of the petitioner is only that he is entitled to the benefit of the decision of the Apex Court in Central Bank of India v. Ravindra [2002(1) KLT 743]. I do not find any error of jurisdiction or legal infirmity in the impugned notice seeking interference by the writ court notwithstanding that the petitioner has statutory right of appeal. Under such circumstances, the writ petition fails. The same is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.18/02.