.3 IN THE HONABLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G JAi.-fc.. W. P. No. .2005 \ ^s-y .^^^ .^%'y .•** - ^t^' .*'**• • .**' >-""'.^'' ..•.•"'' ^y>"&/'- '^y1 ^ igte %it« PETmONER. Ashwani Chandrakar aged 24 years son of Late Shri Biselal, Sammvida Sata Sikchhak Verg - 3. Govt. Primary School Khaparwada, District Durg (C.G.) Versus Respondent ,..^ \J~" 1. The State Govemment of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary,SchooI Education Deptt D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer, Durg (C.G.) j^jy -^-' .B&^T~UR ^6^^&.G'Blu" Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution oflndia. \-.s. •3;:^-^»'';--!Kk3 _The^npfifinnp*' rocn<**'+ftiUK-Ei*>'nSc*'"" +**-— XI-HC-22 3^'qrarcw, yTny'i'i, RKtK-iy _4P.r.!.?.^^V^ 200 3n^!T5pr {^•ri^i'W^T 5hKi*lrftc[ 3)1^1 riUIWHffeH cbl<lfa<n-1 KlhdT?r'fo^ <^1<. ^ia.rf^pTgn^T 6.4.2005 Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsjel for the petitioner. Shri Akhil Agrawal, Panel Lajn/yer for the State. By this writ petition under Ar|ticle 226/22/^of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for regular ^ppointment from 08.7.2002 on the post of Assistant Teacher. • I The case of the petitioner'fe ^hat his father Late Biselal, whowas working as Teacher in the Govt. Primary $chool, Khaparwada, District Durg, died in harness in the month of May 2001 .| The petitioner's father was the so!e bread earner in the family and on account|of sudden death of petitioner's father there is no source of income of the petitfoner's family, therefore, the petitioner had applied for appointment on compas^ionate ground. The petitioner's application was allowed and he has been appc|inted as contract teacher vide order dated |08.7.2002 (Annexure P-2). Furthei) case of the petitionerjs that he ought to g&t^M*^ |have been appointed on regular b^sis as per"n8t®Brt»nNo.F-7-4/2002/1-5 tated 10 June,2003 issued b^ the Ministryof General Administration tepartment, Govt. of C.G., Raipur. ] Counsel for the petitioner arg^ied that as per sub-clause (3) of Clause 6 rf the above scheme of compassicjnate appointment the petitioner ought to lave been appointed as a regular| employee and he could not have been ippointed as daily wager or ad-hoc ()asis or on the contract basis. Sub-clause (3) of Clause 6 of the said scheme| envisages that the prescribed 5% posts leant for compassionate appointme()t shall be filled in by regular appointment ^rovided the applicant isqualified ar^d against that 5% posts the appointment hall not be made on daily wage, ad-11 1 have perused the petition and oc or contract basis. sub-clause (3) of Clause 6, .-X (^^^l) . ^^^ ^7'-}f'/'f covl<' ^" ^^rff 7 / ^' '^ oopeqg •3-1 -/PS •jo pssodsjp spue}s uoffgsd eq| a»ep 9L|) uioj^ sij)uoui OM} ^o poued e uiqiiAl uoiie^siuiiupy (BJSUSO y> Aiisiuijfti sq} Aq p9| / (7-/-J •o|s| 91US439 10 lyBii eift ui os|e eyi Suuspisuoo jaye M8| q}iM souepjoooe| eqi epiosp !|BI(S |,-ON luepuodssj urq 1,'ON luepuodsej 01 Aepo} LUOJJ s>|S9m o/u( e s>|eui o» pg/iAO||B si jsuoiued eifl 's aijt 01 p.ieSej BUIABII pue ssived 9L|i jo^ (^; •uoitoefqo ou seq| yoiqMO) 'SOOZ'9'01. P9»BPsuieqos pies p BUISIBJ [.•ON }uapuodssj 0} uoneiuessjdsj ^ ei|} ^eqi peniuuqns jeuoiiiied eift joj |8( u] •tueu4Uiodde usAiB useq sei| jeuoitBedl ejem s<sod %s .leqisqm teyi jeep iou esso l^ltehPjtei^ >l?tl'J>^l^)^^hlh ^Ujfc.ltfc •ssfnj jsd se Adoo peyiysQ 'piesejo^e uoitosj.ip 941 I|}!M •uoBBtUossjdsj s^tjo tdissg.! p jndiey ••s'o }0 •V.OQ '}usLUijedea pe^issi goOZ 'sunr i<,01- PstEP S-I./ZOOS >ue J3uo4!}sd eqi Aq pssiej siuiod ui jeuoiijted sift jo uoge)ussejdsj |ui pue seoueAsyB sii| ||e Guisiej ^o pousd e uiqijM uoiieiuessjdsj syt y> seouBtSiunojio pue spej l^suqoo peujeej pjesq BUIAEH |s}u^puodsej 9i)} joj lesunoo peujee) }(||B!| eifl ui OS|E pue SSOUBASUG siy ||e ei|Biu o} peMo||G sq Aeui jsuo!}j)ad sunoo psujeei 'ssoueisiunojio 94)1 |sL|t s}sod ieqt }suje6e pue 9|qe|iBAe| si i! uoijjied S4i ^o |Bsnjed fiajfii&uaaisgue USj Wh« i^ue why l^l^US 'i.K^ipy 's>i>»(^s 'i?wih>ih" i=°.p if ZZ-3H-IX