IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.8552 of 2008 SUDHIR @ PAPPU SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 15.5.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. representing the State. The petitioner is facing prosecution for offence under Section 3, 4 & 5 of the Immoral Traffic Act. Counsel for the petitioner submits that as a matter of fact, the petitioner is running a medicine business and has a license under the Drugs & Cosmetics Act. He further submits that that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and in fact he has been roped in this case on mere suspicion on account of which he is in custody since 09.01.2008. On the other hand, Counsel for the State submits that there is a direct allegation that it was the petitioner who was running clandestine business and the two women who were apprehended at the spot have also named the petitioner alleging that it was he who had brought them in the shop for immoral activities. Considering the aforementioned submissions, this Court is of the view that the petitioner should be released on bail after he completes judicial custody of six months i.e. on or after 9.7.2008 as it is claimed by the petitioner 2 that he is under custody since 9.1.2008 upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur with a further condition that one of the bailors must be either the mother or the wife of the petitioner. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this application for bail is disposed of. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)