-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.233 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.233 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.233 OF 2006 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Mr.C.G.Gavnekar for the Appellants CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: MARCH 29, 2006. MARCH 29, 2006. MARCH 29, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Shri Gavnekar for the Appellants. The submission made by Shri Gavnekar in this Second Appeal on behalf of the original Plaintiffs is that under Muslim law after inheriting property of as a sharer, a daughter becomes entitled to only a life interest. The Appellate Court has come to the conclusion that the daughter becomes absolute owner of the share inherited by her. In my view, the finding recording by the Appellate Court requires no interference. There is no merit in the Second Appeal and the same is dismissed with no order as to costs. -2- Judge. Judge. Judge.