1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Second Appeal No.510/2010 Dayaram s/o Bhiva Chaudhary Vs. Mahadeo Domaji Raut =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. M. M. Gulhane, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. O. W. Gupta, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : R. M. SAVANT, J. DATED :31/1/2011. The above Second Appeal challenges the judgment and decree dated 14th June 2010 passed by learned District Judge in Regular Civil Appeal No. 57/2006. There are concurrent findings of fact recorded by the Courts below as regards the readiness and willingness of the plaintiff to perform his part of the contract, also as regards the factum of possession, as the plaintiff had sought to take a plea that his case was covered by Section 53-A of the Transfer of the Property Act. Both the issues were decided against the appellant/plaintiff. In view of the said concurrent findings, no substantial question of law arises for consideration in the above Second Appeal, which is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE Ambulkar