1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6593 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Mr.S.S.Shah for the petitioners. Mr.Vanarase, A.G.P for the State. Mr.V.B.Tapkir for respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 11th September 2009. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, an order appointing Court Commissioner for local investigation has been challenged. The said order is interlocutory in nature which is capable of being challenged in an appeal which may be preferred against the decree passed in the suit. Moreover, the report of the Court Commissioner is never conclusive in the sense that the parties can always file 2 objections to the report of the Court Commissioner. The Court Commissioner can be cross-examined at the instance of the parties. Subject to what is observed above, writ petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA,J)