IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2031 of 1999 AND SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2033 OF 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.R.TRIPATHI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : YES 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- YUGPRABHAV SAHAKARI BANK LTD. Versus DINESHBHAI VITHTHALBHAI PATEL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JAYANT PATEL for Petitioners MR BS PATEL for Respondent No. 1 MS HARSHA DEVANI, ld.AGP for respondents nos.4 & 5 in SCA No. 2031/99. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.R.TRIPATHI Date of decision: 07/08/2000 COMMON ORAL JUDGEMENT Rule. Mr.B.S.Patel and Ms.Harsha Devani, ld.AGP waive the service of Rule on behalf of the respective respondents. With the consent of the parties, the matters are taken up for final disposal. It has been given out by the learned Counsel that two Revision Applications are pending before the Tribunal for final disposal. A joint request is made to the effect that the interest of justice will be served if the Tribunal is directed to hear and decide the Revision Applications Nos. 57/99 and 58/99 pending before it finally latest by 15th September 2000. Both the sides have submitted that it will be in the interest of justice to direct the Tribunal not to be influenced by the present proceedings in any manner whatsoever. It goes without saying that the Tribunal will decide the Revision Applications in accordance with law without being influenced by the present proceedings in any manner and therefore no such specific direction is required to be issued. Mr.Jayant Patel requested that the ad-interim relief granted earlier be continued till the Revision Applications are finally disposed of. The ad-interim relief granted earlier shall continue till the Revision Applications are finally disposed of. Both these Special Civil Applications are allowed and the Rule is made absolute accordingly. (R.R. Tripathi, J.) Sreeram.