FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.6950 OF 2007 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Mr.R.S.Tripathi for the petitioner. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 17TH MARCH, 2008 DATED: 17TH MARCH, 2008 DATED: 17TH MARCH, 2008 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This petition is directed against an order dated 26.2.2007 by which the revision application filed by the petitioner in Interim Notice No.1686 of 2004 in R.A.D. Suit No.30 of 1999 has been rejected. The petitioner had taken out the aforesaid interim notice seeking stay of R.A.D. Suit No.30/1999 on the ground that a suit bearing No.329/1995 filed by the respondent-defendant no.1 against the plaintiff is prior in time and the subject matter of both the suits is one and the same. The courts below have considered the submissions of the petitioner in proper prespective and have concurrently held that the issues involved in both the suits are independent. It appears that the suit before the High Court bearing suit No.329 of 1995 was filed for eviction on the ground that the petitioner-plaintiff is a rank trespasser whereas the suit filed by the petitioner-plainitiff is for declaration that he is tenant in respect of suit premises. In my opinion, the order does not suffer from any infirmity warranting interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and hence the petition is dismissed. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)