1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6846 OF 2009 Mrs. Rajeshree Madhukar Kharat & ors........ Petitioner versus Smt. Shobha Narsingh Shinde & ors ........Respondent. Mr. Ranjit R. Bhonsale adv. for the Petitioner Mrs. Rajalaxmi Iyer i/b. M/s. ALMT Legalfor the Respondent. CORAM: A. P DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 13th November, 2009. P. C.: 1. The counsel for the respective parties present. My attention is invited to the order dated 6-11-2009 passed by this court. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, time was granted to him to ascertain the fact as to whether the possession warrant is already executed or otherwise. Counsel for the petitioner has not received instructions. The counsel for the respondent makes a categorical statement that the possession warrant is already executed and the respondent has taken possession of the premises. This petition challenges the order issuing possession warrant. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous on account of execution of the possession warrant. Hence petition is dismissed as infructuous. 2 (A. P. Deshpande, J.)