Bii; .], —¥? •tsrsw % ^<a 6 /-: HK3H COURT OF CHHArriSOWtH AT BILASPWt Aoplicants/ Non apDlicantflPetiSoner MCC (PRl No. 1843 of200e 1. State of ChhaUisgarh ttirough its SeCTetary, Department <rf F'ubBc Worte, D.K.S. Hiawan, Mantrataya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Coltector, Di^rict Bitaspur (C.G.). 3. The Chief Ei^jineer ^ast), Publte Worics Department, Raipur ffS.G.). 4. The ExecuBve Engineer, Public Worte Oepartment, Bilaspur (C.G.). 5. The Superintending En^eer, PubUc Works Department (Etectrical Dh/iaon), Raipur (CG). 6. The Commfesfoner, BUaspur (CG). VERSUS Mahendra Yadav, Aged about-30 yeafs, S/o Late Shri U.S. Yadav, Wo Arvind Maig, Kirti Kunj, Sarkanda, BBaspur (CG). (Application tor extension to time/tnodification in order dated 31.01 -2006 passed in W.P.No. 13C8/2002, Sitaram Sahu Vs. State of Oihattisgaih & OBiers) Sinate Bench: Hon'bte Mr. Safish K. Aanihotri. J. Present : ShriVinayHarit.DeputyAdvocateGeneralfortheappUcants. ORDER (Passed on 23rd August, 2007) Leaned counsel appearing for Ure peWonere/applicants, Stato of ChhatBsgarh submits that order dated 31.01.2006 fassed in W.P. No. 1308/2002 (Sitaram Sahu \/s. State of Chhattisgarh & Oithere),Sas ^ready been complied with and the respondent/non-appBcant Shri Mahendra Yadav has already been granted compassfonate appointment. tn Vhe process there has been some detay. Learned counsel appearing for the appBcants prays for condonation of detay. Delay is condoned. ; ApptfcaUon is cBsposed of. i ^ . _ s(^~ SatishK.Agnihotri \ Judge Satw