IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 27TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 8TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 4611 of 2009(Y) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- THOMAS MATHEW, S/O.MATHACHAN EZHETHARAYIL HOUSE, EDATHUA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.KRISHNAKUMAR (CHERTHALA) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDHUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSEB ELECTRICAL MAJOR SECTION, EDATHUA. 3. ADDL. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ALAPPUZHA. 4. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT ALAPPUZHA. R1, R2 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN. R3, R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BEJOY CHANDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.4611 of 2009-Y ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 27th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T I heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for the KSEB and the learned Government Pleader. 2. Petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 representation. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on Rule 3 (1) (b) of Works of Licensees Rules 2006. Without expressing any view either on the maintainability or regarding the merits of the matter I dispose of the writ petition directing that Ext.P2 which is said to have been made over to the 4th respondent be considered and a decision taken by the 4th respondent, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. MS