1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7952 OF 2008 Shankar Yadav Sake & Anr. .......... ..... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...... ..... Respondents. Mr. A. A. Kumbhakoni, Sr. Counsel with Mr. Macchindra A. Patil for the Petitioner. Mr. V. S. Masurkar, Govt. Pleader for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED : 8TH DECEMBER, 2008. P.C.: The grievance of the petitioner is that the final voters list was issued but the objections of the petitioner, which he had filed, to the provisional voters list were not taken into consideration. The election programme has so far not been published. 2. After hearing the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing respondent No.3 to consider the matter afresh and pass appropriate order after taking into consideration the objections already filed by the petitioner to the voters list. The matter be decided by him within a period of four weeks from today. 2 3. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (R. V. MORE, J.)