IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 232 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 25 OF 2011 SHRI. VINAYAK K.NAIK AND ORS., ... Applicants Versus SHRI. UMAKANT MOTIRAM KAVLEKAR ... Respondent Mr. V. R. Parsekar, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. G. V. Tamba, Advocate for the Respondent. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 22nd November, 2011 P. C. Heard Shri V. Parsekar, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicants and Shri Tamba, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent. 2. At the time of the hearing of the above application, Shri Tamba, the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent has fairly stated that the Respondent shall maintain status quo in respect of the suit property until the above Second Appeal is heard on admission. Statement is accepted. 3. In view of the said statement, the Applicants seek leave to withdraw the above application. Application stands dismissed as withdrawn accordingly. F. M. REIS, J. arp/*