t-IIGHCOUR1'OFCU M"nS©ARMATBIU PUR JM.G^;il^3^s(rf®007 PETITIONER APPLICANT RESPONDENTS NON.ABnjlCANTS ";f!"<7 3 Grasim Gement, a ymt <rf Grasim Indusfries Umited, A irorapany incorporated underttie provtsions^of Indiarr Gompanies Act,1956, hawng Hs r^istared^^o^ Nagda and EaMoiy of Orasim VjHar, Village & ;Po^^OffK^ Rawan, Tahsit Sim^ Raipur(MF^<N(nyCG). Versus 1. 2. 3.: 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. State of Mwffiya Pradesh Through: Secretary, Land RJBvenue.Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal(MP}(NowCG). The^OntmissioFtfir,RaiRUr<MI:^(NowGG) Tl GolleGtor,Rsupyt-(MP)(N<>wCG) The Sut> DivjsiQnsil Officer, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur(MFi) (Now CG) The Sub Djyisional pfficer, Bhatapara, DisWctRaipur(MP)i(New<3G) KamalnarayantS/oPachkodramDhruwa. Htraiai,S/6 .lobttramKuruwanshi. Hemlat.S/oGirwarDhruwa. Tejram.S/oPhoQlsinghDhnroa. Pandwaram.S/oTtjauram R^pondertt No. 6 to 10 R/o Village Safseni, TahsilSimga,DistrictF%ipur<MP)(NowG<3). 11. Radheshyam.S/QBodhirarnDhruwa. 12. Guharam, S/oJodhah Dhruvra. 13. Riamrrtan.Sfo Biising Dhruwa, Responcfent No. 11 t» 13 Rjfo Villagje- Ghuctlningpur; TahsU Simgia, Distrf^Raipur (MP) (NowCG). 14. Smt. Kuainitoi, D/o Bahursingh Dhruwa. 15. Btsram,S/6 Neelkanth Shikafi. 16. Sorisay.S/ioSiyarantShikari. 17. DwarikarS/oSiyaramSliiKaH, ^w.js- ^ R pondenfNo.14to17R/oVilllag®-<3hhiFahi, TahsUSimga,DistrictRaipuT<M^(NcwCG). 18.MoUlal,S/QSantramVerma. Shiwharan.S/QNareshKumarDhruwa. Nolrareing,SA?^ldideot'r^adDhruwa. KMorbaHararam, S/o Dheluram VishWalsarma. Birajhram, S/o Shivlal Yadav. Rarokishun.S/oSadaram. Sukhjrain,Sfe Itwari Gond. PremdaS,S/oBa|iramRao. Respondent No. l^ Chuchrangpyr, Tahsil Simga, Distrii*; lipur <MP)flltowCG). 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. ;''f "'""K ^. ^ BabU (APPLICATIpNR3RR@ST:ORATIONOFW.P;Na 179/1998) (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Aanihotri. J.V Present : Shri Bhaskar Payasi, Advocate for theapplicant ORDER {Passetton 7th DayofSeptember, 2007) Leamed counsel for the applicant submtts ttiat the counsel for the petitionercouldn<rtappearona<»ountofbonafidemistoke,ttierefore,W.P. No.179/1998,whichwasdtsmissedon 27.07.2007, berestoredto its file. 2. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P. N6.179/1998 be restored to Uw priginal file.subject to payment of cost of Rs.500/-byttieappticant,tottieHighC6urtLegalAic|Commtttee. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record 6f W.P.No.179/1998 and thesamebelistedforhearing. 4. Thre applicatiori stanclsclisposea Of. Sd/- Sarish K. Agnihotn Judge T; .^" / w • •l:'., .fw-