IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 24 OF 2009 MR. AIRES RODRIGUES ... Petitioner Versus MR. SUBODH KANTAK ... Respondent Mr. Aires Rodrigues,Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- S. J. VAZIFDAR & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 22nd March, 2010 P.C. The petitioner contends that contempt was committed by the respondent by averring in the petition for Special Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court that in the written arguments fresh arguments were slipped in by the petitioner, which is false. It is contended that the ground actually is a slur on the reputation of this Court as it impliedly states that this Court permitted such dishonesty on the part of the petitioner. 2. If the statement to the Supreme Court is false, it is not for this Court to deal with the consequences thereof. However, it is contended that the allegation is a slur on this Court. We disagree. We do not find anything in the Special Leave Petition, which even remotely cast a slur upon this Court. It is not even implied remotely that there was any dishonesty on the part of this Court. 3. In the circumstances, the Contempt Petition is dismissed. S. J. VAZIFDAR, J. U. D. SALVI, J. SMA