IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.23571 of 2011 Date of Decision : December 19, 2011. The M.D.Haryana Tourism Corporation Limited .....Petitioner versus Presiding Officer, Industrial Dispute-cum-Labour Court and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Naresh Kumar Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 28.4.2011 passed by the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Panipat, whereby a lump-sum compensation of Rs.25,000/- has been awarded to respondent No.2-workman. As the Labour Court has awarded a meager amount of compensation of Rs.25,000/- to respondent No.2-workman, notwithstanding the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioner- Corporation while questioning the legality of the impugned award, I am not inclined to interfere with the same for the litigation expenses likely to be incurred by respondent No.2-workman would be more than the said amount of compensation. In the peculiar facts and circumstances, the issues raised on behalf of the petitioner-corporation are kept open to be raised at an appropriate stage, without interfering with the impugned award. Disposed of accordingly. December 19, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE