1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Contempt Petition No.236 of 2010 In Civil Application (CAW) No.1828 of 2010 (D) In Writ Petition No.4986 of 2009 (D) (Vinayak Govindrao Durge v. Shri Sanjay Mukharjee, Chairman, Nagpur Improvement Trust, Civil Lines, Nagpur, and another) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri P.S. Khubalkar, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri N.W. Sambre, Advocate for Respondents. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 14 th June, 2011 On 15-7-2010, this Court had recorded the statement of the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1-Nagpur Improvement Trust that immediate steps will be taken to remove the fresh encroachment at the same place as stated by the petitioner. It is not in dispute that on 27-5-2011 whatever encroachment was at the place in question, the same was removed. There is a delay caused in removing the encroachment. Shri Sambre, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Nagpur Improvement Trust, submits that the delay had occurred due to the order of status quo which was passed by the lower Court. Be that as it may, the fact remains that the encroachment 2 has been removed. Shri Khubalkar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the respondent-Nagpur Improvement Trust should be directed to see that no fresh encroachment takes place at the same place and the Trust should continue to monitor the encroachment. However, it is not possible to issue such a direction in this contempt petition. The proceedings for contempt are, therefore, dropped. Judge PDL