IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4907 of 2010 Date of Decision: October 05, 2010 Hukam Chand . …Petitioner Versus Ved Parkash and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Rajiv Doon, Advocate, for Mr.Vivek Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the respondents. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 24.05.2010 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kurukshetra, whereby plaintiff is permitted to file replication, subject to payment of cost. It is reported by the learned counsel that cost has already been paid. C.R. No.4907 of 2010 Having perused the order impugned herein, I am of the view that the learned Trial Court has rightly exercised discretion and jurisdiction under Order 8 Rule 9 CPC while permitting the plaintiff to file replication subject to the payment of cost. I am not inclined to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Dismissed. October 05, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2