IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.18250 of 2010 Date of Decision : October 07, 2010. M/s Salwan Travel Services Pvt. Ltd. .....Petitioner versus Authorised Officer, HDFC Bank Limited and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-Company is aggrieved by the impugned notices dated 12.7.2010 and 27.7.2010 (Annexures P-1 & P-2) issued under Sections 13(2) read with Section 13 (13) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. In view of the recent decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.5990 of 2010 (United Bank of India versus Satyawati Tondon and others), decided on 26.7.2010, no interference with the impugned notices is called for by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction except to observe that the if the petitioner's objections submitted vide legal notice dated 26.8.2010 (Annexure P-3) do not find C.W.P.No .18250 of 2010 2 favour with the respondents-bank, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. October 07, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE