:.i' • ^:".,SingtsBench v IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILA8PUR CHHATTISGARH •• ' . „._-„.^^^^.J^^^--^ ym^t PETltlON N0;' ^ OF2005 PE11TIONER: ^ '^-••^^ vi ..•r^i^" ,(\-"^^ w^ ^^'"'.^ i'yi.. ^--""' ^" Amamath Jaisawal, S/o Vishwanath Prasad Jaiswal, Aged about -36 years, Gram Panchayat Podikala, Tehsil Khatghora & District Korba (C.G.). Versus RKHrQ:NDENT8 :: ^ .< ^ A". ^ •p''/ ^/^^ ^^^ ^'Ql ^ c^ ^^^-o- State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretaiy, Qepartment of Panchayat and Social Welfare, D.K.S. Bmlding, Mantralaya,Raipyr, Chh^ttisgarh. Sub Divisional Qfficer, Khatghora, District Korba (CG). Chief Executive Qffieer, Janpad Panchayat, Podi Uproda, Disto-iGt korba(C.G.). (ji-am Pranchayat, Podikala, 1 Through The Sarpanch, Podikala, Posf Podikala via Pendra, Tehsil Kfaatghora, Disfa-ict Korba (C.G.). ^^_^_ WMT PETn ION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OETHE CONSTITUTIONQFINDIA "^^^'^ I. PARTIClJLARSOFTHrEETITIG^ER. As shown inthecause title. 2,' '•,.PABTICll^RS-OF'THE/.RESPONDENTS. As shown inthecausetitle. y-CTl •r<ll<llrt<<; tp-1i^l<ti«|<»,fiwixiy WI^T^TW' ^200 aii^?rwTR'ii<b wiTsiT^ia>qiw ^P/FS/2005-20,000 3Tf^<!T(ra^(ytt'J6|«d) s^iTwaftcT an^CT 19.10.2005 Shri S.R.J. Jaiswal, Heard. Leam.ed counsel petitioner was appoiated from his seivices pripr to High School Certificate agauist fhis order of appeal toefore the S.D. O. graated in his favour. pending before fhe S. D.0. In tfais view of the prays forwithdrawal oftbji this Court ia case such appeal preferred before th^ The petition is Uberty graated m. favour The petition staads| Consequently, M.W^ 2005 also staad disposed] <oi<iln<i1i *iito»T*t"l«'<3•{luif^it ^sri^trsii^st .cozuisel for the petitibaer. / . . . . [for tfae petitiouer submits that the |as a Panchayat Kanni. He was reinoved 12.12.2004 on accouat ofnot passiag ftie lExamuiation. He furfher submits fhat rea:|6val, the petitioner has already filed ari ), iii which, the order of stay has been ^e also submits that fhe appeal is stfll ^natter, learaed counsel for the petitiorier writ petition with. Uberty to approach to |an exigenGy arises after decision of the S.D.O. to be Wifhdrawn with the aforesaid 4fthe petitioaer. [fiiiaUy disposed of. [P. No. 3975 of 2005 aad I.A. No.8701 of lof — pennfiitted iwa BSB •i • •• Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge i» la