9%%\6 ,. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Na DB. HDN’BLE SHRI DHIRE HON’BLE SHRI RN. CH NDRA MISHRA. 3- ANDRAKAR, JJ Writ Petition (c) No. 5771 of 2009 Present : Shri Manoj Paranjpe, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Harit, Dy AG with Shri SK Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State. DRAL ORDER (Passed o 28anuary, 201 0) Par nhirmdm Mishrs .l By the instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for the ollowin substantive relief: “1, That, this Hon’bie Court may kindfy be please to ' sue e writ of mandamus/any other suitable Writ or wrectron for drrec the reponnts to conSer petrtroner as unreserved tegory canate for the purpose o; adsn the meal cours e respondent no, 1 & 2 may kindiy be directed to pennit the petmoner to ta part in t remaining rounds of counseling The pener further respectfully ays that the suitable ec may ly be sued to e respondents to conser the case of the pener h regard to admission i against the vant seat of all indie Quota and the seats which are lying vacant in a Jagdaipur Govt. Medicai Colieg. 2. That, this Hon’ble Court ay kindly be pieased to issue a writ of mandamus or direction for directing the respondertt no. 3 to communicate the respondent No.2 that the petitioner shouid‘iae treated as unreserved category candidate for the purpose of admission in the iriedicai course and the respondent be further directed to moiede the na of the peiner the me t me ttio in rit lis or‘ eerieral cate§oryics \ n ‘W fg d tmg sde Id ca did mrsro In dic e tn ke he rltro pr dirtion kind Is th id titio Wit ac s e’ m ras \ Peiitioner Payal Keswam'. D/o Satish Kumar Keswani, aged about 22 years, R/o Subhash Traders, Near New Bus Stand, Mungeii, District Biiaspur (CG) Versus Respontients 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Depanment of Health & Family Welfare, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. Director, Medicai Education Old Nurses Hostel, DKS Bhawan Premises, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 3. Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board. Through its Controller C/l 68, Taigore Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) $5 ,. ~ Shri Vénay Harii, learned By. Advocate General with $hri Suryakant Mishra, Panei Lawyer fer {he Sfate, submiis that Jagdalpur Govt. Medical Ce£lege ha3 not been granted permission by the Medical Council of lndia to admit students and conduct course for the academic session 2009-10 and therefore no students have been admitted in the said college for the academic session 2009-10. He further submits that since the last date for medical admission i.e. 30““ September, 2009 has already elapsed, the question of giving admission to the petitioner against All India Quota in the colleges of the State does not arise. in view of‘above submission of learned counsel for the State, the reliefs as claimed by the petitioner cannot be granted. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. .\\ ’\ ‘ Sd/. Dhl'rendra Mist] Sdl- RN. CHANDRAKAK Judge l‘af Judge I /* \