IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 6200 of 2010 Between: 1 Bhawarlal, S/o Umed Ramj, 2 Shanti Devi, W/o Bhawarlal Ji, 3 Ashok Kumar, S/o Bhawarlalji, 4 Savita Devi, W/o Ashok Kumar, 5 Kamala Devi, W/o Hari Ramji, 6 Rampal, S/o Umedram Lal, Petitioners/ Accused No.2 to 7 AND State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. Respondent/ Complainant Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. NAGAVANI PRASUNA Counsel for the Respondent THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Petition under Sections 438 of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated therewith, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioners/accused Nos.2 to 7 on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest by the P.S., Mahila Police Station, Pali, Pali District, Rajasthan State, in Cr.No.9 of 2010 and the petitioners undertake to abide by the condition of conditions that might be imposed by this Hon'ble Court The Court made the following Order: “This Criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is filed by the petitioners-A2. to A.7 seeking anticipatory bail in connection with crime No.9 of 2010 of Pali Mahila Police Station, Rajasthan registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498 A, 406 & 323 of Indian Penal Code. The allegations against the accused are of harassing the complainant physically and mentally for additional dowry of Rs.3 lakhs. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. Petitioners are the parents and brothers of A.1, who is the husband of the de facto complainant. The offence arises out of matrimonial disputes. As such, any arrest of the petitioners may prejudice the future settlement, if any, between the parties. Considering the facts and circumstances and also the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court is of the view that interim anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioners for a period of four weeks from today so as to enable the petitioners to approach the concerned Court and move appropriate bail application and till such time, they shall not be arrested.” Sd/-C. SWARNALATHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2 To 1. The Station House Officer, Mahila Police Station, Pali, Pali District, Rajasthan State 2. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 3. One CC to Smt. Nagavani Prasuna, Advocate (OPUC) 4. One Spare copy Note: The order dated 6-7-2010 in Criminal Petition No.6200 of 2010 is corrected as per the order of the Court dated 26-7-2010 and made in Crl.MP.No.6743 of 2010. Substitute this amended order in place of the previous order which was already dispatched on 8-7-2010. Sd/- D. SUSEELA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR HIGH COURT REJ DT. 6-7-2010 26-7-2010 AMENDED BAIL ORDER CRL.P.NO.6200 OF 2010 DIRECTION Drafted by: KK Drafted on: 7-7-2010 HIGH COURT REJ DT. 6-7-2010 BAIL ORDER CRL.P.NO.6200 OF 2010 DIRECTION