THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH SECOND APPEAL No.1470 of 2010 DT.04.11.2011 Between: Mallapuram Srinadha Rao s/o Chennaiah … Petitioner And Rajamanuri Satyapal s/o Venkata janaki Rao & Ors … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K.Satyanarayana Murthy Counsel for respondent: Sri The Court made the following JUDGMENT: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V ESWARAIAH SECOND APPEAL No.1470 of 2010 JUDGMENT: The appellant herein is the plaintiff filed the suit for specific performance of the Agreement of Sale dated 11-07-1988, which was dismissed, against which, an appeal preferred was also dismissed. Perused the ordered impugned. In the instance case, the plaintiff was not able to discharge his initial burden of proving Ex.A.1, Agreement of Sale, but on the other hand, the defendants were able to rebut the allegations of the plaintiff that Ex.A.1-Agreement of Sale was executed by D.3 on his behalf and as GPA of the defendants 1 & 2. Though the plaintiff failed to establish that Ex.A.1 was executed by D.3, on the other hand, the defendants sent the disputed signatures on Ex.A.1 with that of the admitted signature to the expert opinion and the expert also gave opinion that the signatures on Ex.A.1, Agreement of Sale are not similar to that of the admitted signatures. Having regard to the concurrent findings arrived at by both the Courts below, I do not see any question of law much less a substantial question of law to interfere with the impugned order. The Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________ (V.ESWARAIAH,J) DATE: 04.11.2011 grk THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH SECOND APPEAL No.1470 of 2010 DT.04.11.2011 GRK