IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.4 of 2008 REKHA DEVI ……..Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MOHAN LAL YADAV 3. CHAMAL LAL YADAV 4. NIRUPAMA KUMARI 5. NIRMALA DEVI ……..Opposite parties ----------- 2. 12.11.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order. On perusal of the impugned order, I am also of the view that in such nature of cases no cognizance should be taken. Court below has rightly dismissed the complaint under Section 203 Cr.P.C. Accordingly, this Cr. Revision is rejected. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate writ application challenging the appointment of opposite party no. 5, if so advised. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)