THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.7903 OF 2010 Dated 9th April, 2010 Between: S.Noorjahen …Petitioner And The Government of A.P and five others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri M.L.Ali Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.4 in interfering with the life and personal liberty of the petitioner and her family members and threatening the petitioner to implicate her husband in false cases as illegal and in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. In her affidavit, the petitioner made a detailed description of the alleged harassment meted out by respondent No.4, who is impleaded as respondent No.5 in his individual capacity. The gist of the case of the petitioner is that as her husband, who owns a mini cargo vehicle, did not oblige respondent No.5 to supply the same free of cost, respondent No.5 is stated to have abused his official position by visiting the petitioner’s house and pushing her down apart from taking away one of her sons and detaining him in police station for four days. The humiliating treatment, if found true does not befit the status of respondent No.5 as Sub-Inspector of Police. As the allegations made by the petitioner are too serious to be taken lightly, respondent No.2 is directed to consider petitioner’s representation dated 23.03.2010 and hold an enquiry into the same. He shall summon the petitioner, record her statement and receive the material that may be produced by her in support of her allegations. If in enquiry, it comes out that the allegations made by the petitioner are true, respondent No.2 shall initiate appropriate action against respondent No.5 in accordance with law. He shall complete this exercise within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the above, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP No.10158 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 9th April, 2010 vrn