IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3530 of 2009 1. Nand Kishore Roy aged about 70 years, senior citizen, son of Late B. Roy, resident of village- Nimachak Haider, Police Station- Chak Mehasi, P.O.- Janardhanpur, District Samastipur, retired as Incharge Executive Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board .......Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Mr. Afzal Amanullah, the Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department having his office in Vishwesharaya Bhawan, Police Station- Shastri Nagar, District Patna 2. Mrs. Vandana Priyadarshi, the Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board having her office in Mangles Road, P.S. Sachivalaya, District Patna 3. Sri Rajendra Poddar, the Secretary, Bihar State Housing Board having his office in 6 Mangles Road, Police Station, Sachivalaya, District Patna ......Opposite parties ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Vikash Mohan, advocate For the Housing Board: Mr. Amar Nath Deo, advocate ---------- 10 07-07-2011 Learned counsel for the Bihar State Housing Board has just now handed over an account payee cheque dated 24-6-2011 in favour of petitioner for an amount of Rs. 1, 69,051.50/- by way of payment of difference of salary on account of grant of scale of Executive Engineer as per direction of the Division Bench of this court. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that a chart of calculation should be made available to the petitioner within a reasonable time so that he may verify 2 whether the calculations are correct or not. He also prays that all the concerned authorities be directed to grant further consequential relief by way of revision of retiral benefits and pension etc. in view of grant of scale of Executive Engineer to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the Bihar State Housing Board has no objection to the furnishing of calculation chart within two weeks. He submits that there is no direction for consequential relief in the order of the Division Bench. Last submission is factually correct but in the larger interest of justice and to protect the harassment of a retired employee who is said to be aged above 71 years, we direct the concerned authorities to examine the claim for revising the retiral benefits and in case the claim is found to be in accordance with law, the benefit of revised pension and other pensionary benefits should be made available to the petitioner as per law within a period of four months from today. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall make an endorsement on the order sheet of this court as token of having received the account payee cheque mentioned 3 above. The contempt application is finally disposed of. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Shivaji Pandey, J.)