- 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 2500 OF 2010 Yuvraj Dattatraya Patil & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. Pandurang Laxman Handagale & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. S. S. Patwardhan, for the Petitioner. Mr. P. S. Cardozo, AGP for Respondent No.2. Mr. Amit Borkar, for Respondent No.3. CORAM : R. C. CHAVAN, J. DATED : APRIL 28, 2010. P.C. : 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to delete name of respondent No.1 as he was impleaded in the official capacity. 2. Rule. By consent of the parties rule made returnable forthwith. The learned counsel for respondent No.3 as well as the learned AGP for respondent No.2 state that record which has been sought by the petitioners is brought by the respondent No.1 today in the Court and they would have no objection to furnish necessary copies to the petitioners, and that the petition may therefore be allowed. The writ - 2 - petition is therefore allowed in terms of prayer Clause (A), in so far as question of supply of documents to the petitioner is concerned. 3. The Jt. Director (Sugar) Kolhapur would undoubtedly deal with the proceedings before him, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. Sd/- [R. C. CHAVAN, J.]