1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9887 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri Mandar Limaye for the Petitioners. Shri N.J. Patil for Respondent No.1. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 29th January 2010. P.C.: . Heard learned counsel apperaing for the Petitioners. By the impugned order in this Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, application made by the Petitioners for permission to file additional Written Statement have been rejected by the Appellate Court. In a suit filed in the year 2002, a decree was passed by the trial Court in February, 2007. In an Appeal of the year 2007, the application was filed in September, 2009. It is not in dispute that now hearing of the Appeal has been concluded and judgment has been reserved. 2 2. At this stage, in writ jurisdiction, no interference is called for. The Writ Petition is rejected. However, the remedy of the Petitioners of challenging the impugned order in an appeal which may be preferred against the appellate decree is kept open. (A.S.OKA,J