1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1719/2008 (Nooruddin Sadruddin Pabani VERSUS State of Mah. & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Mr. Anand Jaiswal, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATE : JUNE 4, 2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The counsel for the petitioner states that in the instant petition, the grievance of the petitioner is in respect of various irregularities alleged to have been committed by respondent no.7 society. It is submitted that the District Deputy Registrar, on the basis of earlier complaint of the petitioner, conducted detailed enquiry in respect of the allegations made by the petitioner about irregularities alleged to have been committed by respondent no.7 society and the enquiry report dated 17.09.2007 is also annexed with the present writ petition. The counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the District Deputy Registrar has observed in the said report that there are certain irregularities committed by the society in respect of various aspects pertaining to the authorised share capital, audit report, etc., and therefore, directed the society to rectify the 2 shortcomings within a stipulated period. However, the society has not done anything thereafter, and therefore, the petitioner once again approached this Court for necessary direction. The counsel for the petitioner has also brought to the notice of this Court that the District Deputy Registrar has ordered another enquiry to be conducted by Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies on the basis of the complaints dated 19.12.2007 and 28.12.2007 filed by the petitioner against the society, however, since the District Deputy Registrar has already conducted the enquiry in this regard and the report, as mentioned above, is annexed with the petition, the counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the District Deputy Registrar for follow up action. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is made clear that, in this order, we have not expressed any opinion one way or the other on the merits of the matter and it is for the District Deputy Registrar to consider the issue according to law including his own report. JUDGE JUDGE APTE