ILASPU H3GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BR W.P.(C) N0.933l2010 \ M. ais rels hrouh Proprietor Manish Km in, o Bhagchand Jain, G.E. Road Durg, District Durg (c) Vsu ers 1 Te at raspcrt uthority, ..S. Bhwa, Raipur (CG) 2 The tate Tnsport Appellat Tribunal, Raiur (CG 3 he Kariker Roadwas, Civil Lines, Raipu (G) . 26 OF THE ‘ mt Vi, ousei or petitioner. . ehn Thar, Pei Lr for respondents 1 2 on advance op. Mr. Sokan erna Cn f the Mr Shaak ku an awye & cy ORm. ORDER (95.321ti) 9.0 Hed. Mr. Smk oant Verma, lared en counsel for te h petitioner ubmits ha t petitioner s ile an appeal vide No.83/‘2009 s tt he ha fd befe the TAT, Riur. e maks ilmited prayer that this or S ap H e a petitio a dispo of ith a direction to the STAT, aipu to iose h petner’ appeal at the earliest. Ths mit prae d led counset for the i lied yr mae by eam etition i o opoe iad ni‘ th per s nt psd 'by erne couse for e. ?ETiTiONER /s Mnh Tav, Tg - uar Ja S/ , a i \ RESPONDENTS h Ste Tn A DK an S ra e p ) T y - r C WRIT PETiTiQN UNEER ARTICLE 2 CONSTITUTION OF ENDEA Appearance : SUNIL KUMAR SINHA ar n my be sed W Rr dsp of te itios 2 M349} No,933i2019 Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that iooking to the controversy raised and the fact that the STAT, Raipur has disposed of another appeal of respondent No.3 by an order dated 16.11.2D09, the STAT, Raipur wouid try to dispose of the petitioner’s appeai at the eariiest so that the interest of the petitioner is nOt jeopardized. With the above obeervationidirection, this petition stands finaiiy disposed of.