IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN WRIT PETITION No.29002 of 2010 Between: M/s.J.B. Residency Residents Welfare Association, H.No.5-6-530 to 533, Pragathi Nagar, Nizamabad, Reptd., by its President-V.Sudhama and others. … Petitioners And Municipal Corporation, Nizamabad, Reptd., by its Commissioner and others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Avinash Desai for Mr.A.Lakshmi Narayana, M/s.M.V.Kini & Co. Counsel for the respondents: Sri S.M.Sayeed for Sri J.Kanakaiah for R.1 & R.2. AGP for Municipal Administration for R.3. None for R.4. Sri S.Ganesh Rao for R.5. This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “ … to issue a Writ, order or orders, direction or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent 1 to 3 in not preventing the unauthorized constructions being made in premises J.B.Residency, H.No.5-6-530 to 533, Pragathi Nagar, Nizamabad as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of A.P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1991 r/w. Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act and also A.P. Apartment and Promotion of Construction and Ownership Act, 1987 and consequently direct the respondent No.5 to dismantle the unauthorized constructions made in 5th floor, terrace, entire commercial block and cellar in J.B.Constructions/Residency/J.B.Towers, H.No.5-6-530 to 533, Pragathinagar, Nizamabad”. At the hearing it is represented by the learned counsel for the parties that during the pendency of this Writ Petition, the constructions raised by respondent No.5 have been regularized, vide: proceedings No.G1/108/BPS/00391/2007-08, dated 24-1- 2011, of respondent No.1. Questioning the said order, the petitioners filed Writ Petition No.13690 of 2011. In view of the subsequent development, the relief claimed in the Writ Petition cannot be granted. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.36957 of 2010 is disposed of as infructuous. -------------------------------------- C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:26-8-2011 MNR