IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23787 of 2008 AJIT KUMAR PATHAK @ AJIT KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 17.09.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Renewing the prayer for bail in case under Sections 304 B and 201/34 of the Penal Code the submission on behalf of the husband is that the FIR was lodged inter alia 12 days after the death of the deceased by diorrehea. Only for the reason that there was no material in the case diary with regard to the treating doctor he has remained in custody on suspicion when the two witnesses who have deposed in trial have not supported the charges and rest of the witnesses despite summon and warrant of arrest were not forthcoming. Let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties, one of whom must be the deponent of the present bail application, of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C. V Munger in Sessions Trial No. 162/2006 arising out of Harpur PS Case No. 20/04. Let the petitioner also file his undertaking to be personally represented on each date in the trial as also his physical appearance on the dates that the court below shall direct so that the trial may proceed expeditiously. In the event of his breaching his undertaking the court below shall be at liberty to proceed against him appropriately in law without being inhibited by grant of bail by this Court. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)