IN THE HkGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISG£EE w,P. No! f 25 ‘?—/zoos PETITIQNER: Anupam Samasddar; Aged about Zé yearsp; / S/o. Shn' Manoranjan Samasddar, R/o. Eii’llage Bhajramgarh; Tahsil rBijapur; msmct Dantewada (CG) vEPsIw K Jc RESPONDEN'g : 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary; Tribal Wfelfare Depttv D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur CG) Collector; Dantewada; Distt Dakshin Bastart Dantewada (CG) Director, Panchayat and Gramin ‘ Vikas Vibhag, Chhattisgarh; Raipur; District Raipur(CG) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bhairamga rh, Dsistn‘ct Dantewada (CG) Block Education Officer, Jianpad Panchayat, Bhairamgarh, District Dantewada (CG) Chief Executive Officer; Zila Panchayat, Dantewada, Diistn'ct Dantewada (CG) \ DER ARTICLE ZZé/zl7 OF THE TH’UHON OF INDLA. ( JWRIT PETITIQ. U. CQNS HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. No. 1257 OF 2006 > Shri Manoj Paranjpe, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sum'l Otwani, panel lawyer for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (25th Maxch, 2006) 1. This petition challenges the impugned order dated 30.11.2005, (Annexure P—9), passed by the respondent No.5, whereby the O$cer Incharge of Primary School Danner, Block Bhairamgarh, District Dantewada, has been directed that the order dated 20.10.2005, (Annexure P—5), passed by the Janpad Panchayat, Bhairamgarh, appointing Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, be not given enect to without permission of District Collector, Dantewada. $7.. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was duly selected and appointed as Shiksha K Karmi Grade-III, vide order dated 20.10.2005 (Annexure P- 5), passed by the respondent No.6. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted the joining report on 2. 12.2005, (Annexure P—8). Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioner had joined the duties on 2. 12.2005, itself. 3. The petitioner was informed that the entire selection process appointing Shiksha Karmi Grade-Ill, has been cancelled. It is further contended that the petitioner has not Peu't'loner : Anupam Samasddar Versus Respondents ‘ r . State of Chhattisgarh 85 Others. received any' written information as yet about cancellation of the selection proceedings, or his appointment. . Learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1, 2 and 3, submits that the petih'oner has never joined pursuant to his selecu'on and appointment as Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, as the Annexure P-8 is the application made by the petitioner to the Chief Executive O$cer, Janpad panchayat, Bhaiiamgarh, for his joining. It was further submitted that since the entire selection proceedings have been quashed and new selection process has been initiated, the petitioner does not have any right to the appoinunent. 5. Be that as it may, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petih'oner has made a representation, (Annexure P- 11 and P- 12) to the Secretary Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Backward Classes, Welfare Departinent, Government of Chhattisgarh, therefore, the respondents may be directed to decide the said representation within a stipulated period. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-ll and P-12), in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks, hem the date of receipt/production of copy of this order. 7. In View of foregoing, this petition stands disposed of. No Sd/-‘ a order as to costs. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge -