IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9510 of 2011 1. Mala Sharma wife of SRI NAND KISHORE SHARMA RESIDENT OF MAJHAULIA ROAD, P.S. KAZI MOHAMMADPUR, MUZAFFARPUR. 2. MANJU DEVI WIFE OF SRI ANIL KUMAR SINGH RESIDENT OF AGHORIA BAZXAR, KALAMBAGH ROAD, KAMESHWAR LANE, P.S. KAZI MOHAMMADPUR, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. 3. PRITI VERMA WIFE OF AWADHESH CHAND DUTTA RESIDENT OF SATPURA NEEM CHAUK, P.S. KAZI MOHAMMADPUR, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. 4. ASHA KUMAR WIFE OF BHUNESHWAR PRASAD RESIDENT OF MOHALLA MISHRA TOLA GANIPUR, P. S. KAZI MOHAMMADPUR, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. 5. SUNITA PANDEY WIFE OF INDU BHUSHAN PRASAD RESIDNET OF PANKHATOLI, P.S. KAZI MOHAMMADPUR, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. 6. PRAMILA KUMARI WIFE OF RABINDRA KUMAR MISHRA, RESIDNET OF MOHALLA B.B. GANJ, GANDHI NAGAR ROAD NO. 3, P.S. SADAR, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. 7. KUMARI NIRMALA DEVI WIFE OF RAM JAPU THAKUR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MADHUBANI, P.S. PALAHI, P.S. SADAR, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. 8. RAJNI KUMARI WIFE OF LATE BINOD KUMAR SINHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAHBAJPUR, P.O. BHIKHANPUR, P.S. AHIYAPUR, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, PATNA. 3. DIRECTOR, I.C.D.S. SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, PATNA. 4. COMMISSIONER, TIRHUT DIVISION, MUZAFFARPUR. 5. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUZAFFARPUR. 6. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, MUSAHARI, MUZAFFARPUR. ---------------------------------- For the petitioners :- Mrs. Alka Verma. - 2 - For the State :- Mr. Manoj Kumr Ambastha, G.P. XIV and Mr. Subodh Kumr, A.C. To G.P. XIV ------- 2 30/08/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. All these petitioners have a long period of experience in the role of Angan Bari Sevikas. When the State Government decided to create post of Angan Bari Supervisors, advertisement in this regard was issued with certain guidelines thereto. Appointment on the post of Supervisors was to be made from two sources, one from direct appointment if they fulfilled the requisite qualifications etc. in this regard to the extent of 2/3rd of the post and other 1/3rd was to be filled up from the pool of talent of experienced persons coming from Angan Bari Sevika. However, the State government laid down the maximum age in such a situation to be 45 years. Since all these petitioners are way past 45 years of age, obviously their claim is hit by laying down the maximum age for such selection. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that their ought not to have been age bar in - 3 - matters of such selection from the pool of Angan Bari Sevika and the experience should be given the primary consideration in such selections. If the age bar or age relaxation is not given, prejudice is to be caused to the petitioners. Petitioners have pressed into service the so called request or recommendation made by the Divisional Commissioner, Muzaffarpur in his communication dated 31.12.2010 addressed to the Principal Secretary, Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. Prima facie, the Court is of the opinion that these are policy matters and fixing maximum age for such appointment by itself cannot be termed to be arbitrary. Whether some kind of considerate re-look at the age bar is required or not is a matter for the State which is going to be the recruiting authority in matters of such kind. In absence of any clear constitutional provision coupled with any statutory provision by virtue of which waiver in the maximum age of such recruitment can be held to be ultra vires, the Court comes to a considered opinion that these are policy decisions which do not suffer from any irrationality where experience by itself - 4 - would be good enough for giving a break to the Angan Bari Sevika in matters of appointment as Supervisors. It is an issue which can be best decided as a matter of policy by the State. This writ application is disposed of with a direction upon the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department (respondent no. 2) that taking cognizance of the communication contained in annexure-10 which is the letter of recommendation made by the Divisional Commissioner, he will communicate to one and all the final opinion of the State government on the issue of fixation of 45 years of age in such matters of appointments. No mandamus is required to be issued in this regard. The Court expects the opinion of the State to be communicated to one and all within a period of three months from the date of production or communication of a copy of this order so that the recruitment process, once initiated, can be expedited. This writ application is disposed of with the direction aforesaid. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)