IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3988 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3988 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3988 OF 2007 Sudam Mangu Rathod ..Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr.Sandip Dadwal for the Applicant Mr.Saste for the Respondent CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 22nd April, 2008. DATED : 22nd April, 2008. DATED : 22nd April, 2008. P.C. 1. The applicant is charged under Section 390, 398, 328 and other relevant offences and is shown to be concerned in C.R.No. 129 of 2005. Today the matter was for perusing the chargesheet. The chargesheet is not produced. Instead of adjourning the matter, it would be proper to direct the learned District Judge-I, Vasai to take up the Sessions Case for trial expeditiously and out of turn. This is being done particularly because the applicant is in jail and the application for bail came to be filed through jail. 2. It is clarified that no views are expressed on the merits of the matter. If the applicant gets the chargesheet, he is free to make an application -2- before the learned District Judge-I for bail even during the pendency of the trial and this Order shall not come in the way of making such application. Hence the order: ORDER i. The learned District Judge, Vasai is hereby directed to take up the case of the present applicant who is concerned in C.R.No.129 of 2005 as expeditiously as possible. ii) If the applicant gets the copy of the chargesheet, he is free to make an application before the learned District Judge-I for bail. No views are expressed on the merits of the matter. . This bail application is disposed of accordingly. (R.Y.Ganoo, (R.Y.Ganoo, (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) J.) J.)