1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH H.C.P(MD)No.827 of 2011 Ramachandran .. Petitioner vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police O/o. Superintendent of Police Madurai, Madurai District 2. The Inspector of Police T-Kallupatti Police Station, Madurai District 3. Kumar 4. Krishnan 5. Sundararaj .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus to direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body and person of the petitioner's daughter Azhagurani wife of Muthukumar aged about 30 years before this Court and set her at liberty. For petitioner : Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For respondents : Mr.A.Ramar,Public Prosecutor for R1 and R2 Mr.R.Ramas for R3 Mr.C.Padmaraj for R4 No Appearance for R5 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH,J) Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah, the learned counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, Mr.A.Ramar, the learned Public Prosecutor appeared on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2, Mr.R.Ramas, the learned counsel appeared on behalf of the third respondent and Mr.C.Padmaraj, the learned counsel appeared on behalf of the fourth respondent. No appearance for the fifth respondent. 2. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to produce his daughter by name, Azhagurani, wife of Muthukumar, aged about 30 years, before this Court and set her at liberty. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. The detenue, Azhagurani, is produced before this Court by the second respondent Police. The petitioner is also present. We have enquired the detenue about her whereabouts and she told us that she has been away on her own accord, due to the misunderstanding with her husband, Muthukumar, and she came to the Court on hearing that her father had filed the Habeas Corpus Petition. 4. When we posed the question whether she is willing to go with her father, she informed the Court that she is willing to go with her father, the petitioner herein. 5. Since, the detenue is produced by the second respondent Police and she is willing to go with her father, she is set at liberty to go along with her father. The Police, who had registered the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner, has to proceed with the investigation, in accordance with law. Accordingly, this Habeas Corpus Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Superintendent of Police O/o. Superintendent of Police Madurai Madurai District 2. The Inspector of Police T-Kallupatti Police Station Madurai District 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai, +1cc to Mr.C.Padmaraj, Advocate, Sr.No.35189 H.C.P(MD)No.827 of 2011 10.10.2011 lan SMA/28.10.2011/5C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/