1 901.ss-245-06 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi SUMMARY SUIT NO. 245 OF 2006. WITH SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 190 OF 2009 Shantilal Gelabhai Chheda. ..Plaintiff. vs. Dr. Madhavdas Lakhmidas Kapadia HUF & Ors. ..Defendants. .... Mr. N.S. Fadia, i/b. U.S. Fadia, for Plaintiff. Mr. K.R. Shekhawat, for Defendant Nos. 2 to 4. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 29TH APRIL 2011. P.C. : The learned Advocate appearing for the Plaintiff submits that the Suit against the Defendant Nos. 1 and 5 be dismissed as not pressed. The Suit is therefore dismissed against Defendant Nos. 1 and 5 as not pressed. 2. The learned Advocates appearing for the parties now tender consent terms dated 22nd March 2011. They submit that the consent terms be taken on record and the Suit between the Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 2 to 4 be disposed of in terms of the consent terms. 3. The consent terms dated 22nd March 2011 are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The consent terms are 2 901.ss-245-06 signed by the Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 2 to 4. The consent terms are also signed by the Advocate for the Plaintiff and the Advocate for Defendant Nos. 2 to 4. The Plaintiff is present in Court and he informs the Court that the contents of the consent terms are interpreted and explained to him in Gujrathi. 4. The Suit between the Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 2 to 4 is accordingly decreed in terms of the consent terms marked ‘X’. Refund of Court fees, if any, as per Rules. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]