IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11849 of 2010 JAHEDUE KHATOON & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 13.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the I.P.C. Petitioner no.1 is married sister of the husband, petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are the younger brothers of the husband and petitioner no.4 is the mother of the husband. There is general allegation against the petitioners but from the impugned order it appears that the cognizance has been taken in the year 2006 and after that processes were issued under Section 82 of Cr. P. C. but the petitioners did not appear. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners reside in Delhi and the processes were never served upon them in view of the matter they could not appear. Learned counsel for the petitioners 2 undertakes that the petitioners will regularly appear before the learned court below without fail. Considering the aforesaid undertaking and in view of the fact that the petitioners are family members of the husband and all of them reside at Delhi, let these petitioners, namely, Jahedue Khatoon, Md. Shamim, Md. Munna and Roushan Khatoon be released on bail on their surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 507C of 2006 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Nalanda at Bihar Sharif, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. It is made clear that the learned court below will consider to cancel the bail of the petitioners if they failed to appear on three consecutive dates. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)