IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.210 OF 2009 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST. NO.3886 OF 2009 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.46 OF 1998 (D). (SUDHAKAR SADASHIV INGOLE.Vs. P.U. UMARKAR SECRETARY GRAMIN SHIKSHAN SANSTHA & 3 ORS.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Shri A. Parchure, Advocate for Appellant. Mrs. U.A. Patil, Advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mrs. T.D. Khade, A.G.P.. for Respondent No.3. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 09, 2009. 1. Heard. 2. Accepting the reasons, assigned in the application for condonation of delay of seventeen days caused in filing Letters Patent Appeal Stamp No.3886 of 2009, which are good and sufficient, the application is allowed. JUDGE JUDGE RR. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST. NO.3886 OF 2009 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.46 OF 1998 (D). (SUDHAKAR SADASHIV INGOLE.Vs. P.U. UMARKAR SECRETARY GRAMIN SHIKSHAN SANSTHA & 3 ORS.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Shri A. Parchure, Advocate for Appellant. Mrs. U.A. Patil, Advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mrs. T.D. Khade, A.G.P.. for Respondent No.3. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 09, 2009. 1. Heard. 2. It is not in dispute that the fate of this Letters Patent Appeal is contingent upon the fate of Letters Patent Appeal No.478 of 2008. We have, today, dismissed Letters Patent Appeal No.478 of 2009. 3. No reason to grant any indulgence in this appeal remain. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE RR.