^^s^sss ^- INTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (G.G.) W.P.(C) No.^T^^of 2010 </" ~ PETITIONER . \V(3 Gajanand Sahu S/o Jyoti Lal Sahu, IA--.J1- <^--"\""/-\-^^ ' a9ecl about 40 years, R/o Dabhara, .-••••••."^...•^''Afffe Distt. Jangir-Champa (C.G.) ..^^^""^•'^ ~ ~"~" ""a" ~"""r~ "'"' ^....-••- VERSUS RESPONDENT Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •a;. '•»>•- '<*. HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BtLASPUR WRIT PETITION ?C) No. 2746 of 2010 PETITIONER : Gajanand Sahu. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : RegionalTransport Authority. WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Present: Shri Santosh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. (Passed on 17ih day of June,2010) the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally. 1) Grievance of the petitioner is that on 24.02.201 O (Annexure P-1), the petitioner moved an application before the respondent for grant of regular stage carriage permit on the route Kharsta to Sarangarh and back one return trip daily. However, till date the same has not .been decided by the respondent. 2) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the said application expeditiously. 3) Learned counsel for the State submits that application of the petitioner shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4) tn view of foregoing, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the application dated 26/08/2009 fited by the petitioner within a period of 8 week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of^ _ Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge Armt