6%, ® ‘w'lzw7/,l § § : i i 1N3 im; HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR k i w. P. (s) No. 5a 5 oLF 2010. PEEITIQNER z Smt. Hemlata Dewangan, § W/o. Shri § K. Dewangan, aged ‘ ‘ about 56 years, R/o. Behind of ‘ Chandrakar Hospital, Mahadeo Ghat Roaq, Shanti Vihar Colony, Danganiyé, Raipur (C. G.) V'ERSUS :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) ' K. . . ‘E 2. Dlstrlct Educatlon Off1cer, Raipur, District Raipur (C. G.) / 3. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension, Raipur, District Raipur (C. G.) :r k r WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ‘ zé YQ M ‘ \ ' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH AT BILASPUR V . g WRIT PETITION (S) No 565 of 2010 PETITIONERS Smt. Hemlata DewaILgan. VERSUS RESPONDENTS Statc of Chhattmgar & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE LIONSTITUTION OF INDIA ' SB Hon’ble Shrl Satlsh K Agmhotrl, J resent 1 shn Somkant Verma, Advocate for thé pet1t10ner Shn oy, nel Lyer or the te/respoent l 1 (Pass on 3' day f eru 20 10) lh he const of r ue ppea o h r, the io ar all Ld counsel ppin or th petio sbmits that h petition as ote my s Assa ece a ixe o 10s on ba ter peo pramn peo peone a red Wt t en leaned consl anng fr te patles petitn 1s hed fmy eame aearg f e tiner; u te er w , appind mall a istnt Tahr on fd pay f Rs 0/ protmn Af comlnn of obt nd the tmr ws gant rgular pay al of s 69—30 S ema u submrts t th 1e , e sce R. 10/-. hn Vr frther tha e ssu . involed i t cas t wter th et ele o gu a sle it ct o’ th a ia appointt or att pleti ' pbao prio Te ssue ld er was srre y Madya desh tate Amste Tu abalur ( ht he A 7/89 Mhuk a s s e fMP te), whein it (adant Yadu nd 56 other v S’tat o & ohrs er was I d h mu s1ued eers a led to regular y ale t e o uia pomt Te mae akn p he m Te al was s ue o pho he ' bnal ct t the Tehes/sist Tachrs a ntitd o Tuu to the eEe hat acrAsant ee re ele t regular pay scale hom date of initial apporntment In View 0t the above submisswns made by leamed counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e., the petitioner is granted liberty. to make a representation, 1f so advised, to consider her cas its own . merit and in its perspective. Ifthepetitioner stands on the samefootings as per order passed by the SAT in Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequently confirmed by the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No 6892/93 by order dated 3 1-1994 the petitioner may be entitled to same relief p accordingl Sd/_ SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI r‘ Jase: ‘ a w I P N N R Pa aw f Stands ORAL ORDER a ed 0“ o Fbary v n he e is aso heh e pitioner is ntitd t relar py ; ca wh effe hm e dte of initl men er comon of 1 rotin ed h i invove hein conded b the h Pra S g duuratlv ribnal Jp for sor “t ST ’) 1n O ANo 245 i hel that te slarly tat tach re entit pa sc w ef g he dat f ntl apment h ttr was te u to t Supree Court " h ppea dismised by the Sprem Curt ulding t decisionof the W y