IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 23RD FEBRUARY 2007 / 4TH PHALGUNA 1928 Con.Case(C).No. 333 of 2007(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.9332/2006 .................... PETITIONER/ 1ST RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------- K.V. JOSEPH, SON OF OUSEPH VARGHESE, AGED 75 YEARS, KULAKKATTU HOUSE, THATHEMPALLY WARD, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.O.V.MANIPRASAD RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 : ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEVAYANIAMMA, W/O KARTHEKEYAN, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, KARHIKA TOURIST HOME, SANATHANAM WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 2. S.K. PREMACHANDRAN,. S/O KARTHEKEYAN, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, KARHIKA TOURIST HOME, SANATHANAM WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 3. S.K. VINAYACHANDRAN, S/O KARTHEKEYAN, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, KARHIKA TOURIST HOME, SANATHANAM WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 4. S.K. KISHOREKUMAR, S/O KARTHEKEYAN, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, KARHIKA TOURIST HOME, SANATHANAM WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 5. S.K. SUDHEERKUMAR, S/O KARTHEKEYAN, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, KARHIKA TOURIST HOME, SANATHANAM WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 6. D. SARASAMMA, D/O KARTHEKEYAN, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, KARHIKA TOURIST HOME, SANATHANAM WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 7. SWARNALATHA, D/O KARTHEKEYAN, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, KARHIKA TOURIST HOME, SANATHANAM WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 8. JYOTHISHMATHI, D/O KARTHEKEYAN, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, KARHIKA TOURIST HOME, SANATHANAM WARD, ALAPPUZHA. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI.DINESH.R.SHENOY SRI.RAM MOHAN R6 TO R8 SRI.SHINOD G.P. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN(AG.C.J.) & M.N. KRISHNAN,J. = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = C.O.C. NO. 333 OF 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2007. J U D G M E N T Radhakrishnan,(Ag.C.J.) This contempt case is disposed of, making it clear that it is open to the petitioner to move the Executing Court to enforce Annexure 3 order, in the event of which the Executing Court will pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, (AG. CHIEF JUSTICE). M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-