IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.26934-M of 2010 Date of Decision:10.11.2010 Kuldip Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. M.S. Bajwa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Paul, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.101 dated 8.8.2010 registered under Sections 419/466/467/471/200/205/120-B IPC at Police Station Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur. It was contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the present petitioner identified the surety bonds presented by Manjit Singh son of Hardial Singh. However, the petitioner is not at fault as the said surety bonds were used by Manjit Singh son of Jaswant Singh, who is known to him being Lambardar of the village and has now escaped from the country. It was further contended that the petitioner in his 15 years' service as Lambardar never identified a wrong person and in fact himself is now the aggrieved party. Accordingly, notice to Advocate General Punjab was issued while granting interim bail. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Gurdev Singh states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation. Accordingly, order dated 14.9.2010 is made absolute and the petition is allowed as such. 10.11.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE