IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34065 of 2010 Jawahar Thakur, son of Birajan Thakur Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/- 07.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. No doubt, petitioner is named in the First Information Report but no specific overt act has been attributed against him, rather, vague and general allegation has been leveled against him. In course of argument, learned counsel for informant tried to convince me that the petitioner participated in assaulting the informant as well as deceased but I am not at all convinced with the aforesaid submission. Furthermore, learned counsel for informant tried to convince me by placing the criminal antecedents of the petitioner but admittedly the alleged occurrence took place on account of previous enmity so the criminal antecedents of the petitioner does not have much importance in the present case. Considering the aforesaid facts and 2 circumstances as well as submission of the parties, above named petitioner, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 98 of 2010. Ashwini/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)