THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH C.C.NOS. 765 AND 766 OF 2005 COMMON ORDER Heard both the counsel. 2. The petitioners in both the contempt cases are elementary and upper primary schools and they are aided institutions. When vacancies arose in the respective institutions, after obtaining permission from the competent authority, selection process was completed and the names of the selected candidates were sent to the Government for approval. On the ground that there is ban, the said proposals for approval of the selected candidates, was rejected. Aggrieved by the same, writ petitions in W.P.Nos.9935 and 9939 of 2005 were filed and this court by common order dated 9.6.2005, disposed of the writ petitions and the operative portion of the order reads as under: “3. At the time of hearing, both sides represented that similar matters were already been disposed of allowing the writ petitions directing the respondents to pass orders approving the list of candidates sent by the petitioners where permission was accorded for filling of the vacancies prior to the imposition of the ban by a memo dated 20.10.2004. Therefore, the impugned orders are set aside and the respondents are directed to pass order expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” 3. Complaining that the respondents have not complied with the above order of this court, the present contempt cases are filed. 4. In the counter affidavits filed in both the contempt cases, after narrating the facts, at paragraph nos.5 and 6, it is stated as per the directions of the Government Memo No.18506/PS-2/2004-2 dated 27-06-2005 the writ appeal was preferred against orders dated 9.6.2005 in W.P.No.9935 of 2005 vide in W.A.No.107648/2005. The Hon’ble Court in its orders dated 31.10.2005 in W.P.No.1578/2005 and its batch has delivered the following order:-- “Heard learned counsel for the parties. Let the writ appeals come after thee weeks. In the mean time, the Government is directed to complete its process of rationalization and fill up all the posts, which are necessary to be filled up. If the posts are not filled up in the petitioner institutions, where the need is already established, the establishments shall be at liberty to make appointments on their own after expiry of three weeks. There are some institutions where we are told that selections were made prior to 3.6.2003, which were permitted by the Director of Education as well. Those appointees shall continue to remain in service.” 5. In the counter affidavit it is further stated that as per the instructions issued by the Director of School Education, Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad in proceedings in Rc.No.140/B2-1/2005 dated nil-11-2005, the exercise of rationalization of teaching staff was taken up as per the staffing pattern prescribed in G.O.Ms.No.103 Edn. Dated 5.8.2005 and based on the visit reports of the teams constituted. The two Secondary Grade Teacher posts in R.K. Upper Primary School, Banglathota, Nellore District were filled up on redeployment by Sri P.Surendra Paul, SGT and Sri K.Joseph Reddy, who were identified as surplus teachers in St. Peter’s High School, Nellore District vide proceedings in Rc.No.4979/A1/2005 (aided) dated 19.11.2005 of the District Educational Officer, Nellore and Member Convener Rationalization Committee, Nellore. Therefore, it is stated that the respondents are scrupulously following the rationalization and filling up of posts in accordance with established need. 6. In view of the above averments made in the counter affidavits, I do not find and violation of the orders of this court and the contempt cases are dismissed. No costs. AVS -------------------------------- 28—04—2011