BEFORE THE; HON'BLE M.§~’.i3 ATE 'ADPéIINISTRAUKVQ JgiijaUNAL BENCH, RAH-LE , M . P . APPLICATI‘JJN UNDER SECTION 19 OF ADMINISTRATIVE: TEIIBUNAL ACT; l98_5 l. PARTICULARS QF THE AP?L1CANT: As stated above in case‘title of the ORIGINAL APPLICATION. \ “J IID2O'D. D My“ O'A' “/299W V,o ‘“g , ¢ ' Purushottam Laxman Dhurde, . by SMIqo‘rziaTa?) S/e Laxman Dhurde, STENQGRAFHER, ‘wMMm' M P, 5M0 AW. TIINnI. Pt.J.KmM¢,Medlcal , uollege, ,. i .ww Ruwn. Raipur, _ Resident of 44/623, Dangania éhowk, ’& ,3”; P U R §M.P.)_. -A?IJLICANT. M E R S U S. , \Vv l $TATE OF MADI-IYA PRADESH, /Wxg%%ggH9§;ECBETARY, *EvrEHEQé EDUCATION DEPARTFu‘IENT, zxllkNTRALAY/A, VALLABH BHAVAN, B H Q? A L (m.?.). ‘X. THE DIRECTOR, MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTffiENT, SATPUDA BHAVAN, ,B H <3 P A L (M.P.). . THE DEAN, Pt. J.N.M.,MEDECAL CQLLEGE, R A I P U R (M.P.). yTHE JOINT DEECTOR- OF TREASURY, NEAR NAGAR GHADI CHOWK, git; I 1D U R ggz1.P.1. - NON—A3315LICANT . HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition [3) No. 3129 of 2005 Petitioner Purushottam Laxman Dhurdc ~Versus- State of Madhy'a Pmdesh (now Chhattisgarh) &. others Single Bench : Hon’ble Shi Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Respondents Shri‘Prakash Tiwari, Advocate for thc petitioner. Shn' M. P. S. Bhatja, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents] State. 0RDER[oran (Passed on this 10th day of November, 2009) With the consent of the parties the matter is heard iinally.This case pertains to grievance of non-grant of retiml dues/pension] interest. - Leained counsel appearing for the petitioner, on insu'uctions, submits that the matter may be mfened to the pension committee. This Court, in the matter of W.P.No.4642/ 2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh 8a others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiml dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pmsuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P.No.1961/2006, (Smt. Keja Bai Chan'dmkar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), and order dated 13 3 2008 passed m M C C No 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattlsgarh and others Vs Ba11nath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition 1s squarely covered by the Judgment and order dated 31“ January, 2008 passed in W.P.No. 4642/ 2004 (Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e., the omce of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, Within a period of 15 days horn the date of receipt of a copy of this order as well as a copy of the petition hom the 3 “’71/ petih'oner, pct'lfxoner and Themafter, of&cers the concerned Co ‘ttee within shall a further issue notice pexind to of the 15 days. with The law, Committee after £ording shall consider proper opportunity and yass order, of hean'ng in accordance to the pe&§oner. The petitioner and the oEcers concerned may $e additional payment within a period of documents, reu'xal of four dues, if months necessary. if any, dom to The the the date emire petitioner, of exercise, receipt be of completed including a copy of this The order. petitioner shall supply one complete _ set of the petition to the State counsel for uansferxing the same to the Committee. riff, v ' _ V,,__, K i Swish K. Agnihotn Judge Sdl- ‘\ L \ \ j t \ 4