Civil Revision No.3324 of 2009(O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.3324 of 2009 Decided on : August 27, 2009 Chand Singh and others ... Petitioners VERSUS Sahib Singh and others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Ms.Sonia G.Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. A.N.JINDAL, J.- Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 22.4.2009 passed by Additional District Judge, Barnala, vide which the application of the petitioners for impleading them as parties at the appellate stage, was dismissed. Factual background of the case is that the plaintiffs (now respondents No.1 to 3 in this petition – herein referred as `the plaintiffs') filed a suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell executed with regard to the land comprised comprised in Khasra No.234(51-0 `Gair Mumkin Chhaper'), therefore, the Trial Court refused to grant decree for specific performance. Against the said judgment, the plaintiffs preferred the appeal. Civil Revision No.3324 of 2009(O&M) [ 2 ] During the pendency of the appeal, the petitioners moved an application being the villagers and having interest in the property for impleading them as party – respondents to contest the appeal against the plaintiffs. Heard. Notwithstanding the fact that the petitioners are not necessary parties, yet they being the villagers could be said to have common interest in the land involved in the appeal. It has been conceded that the petitioners would not press for filing written statement or lead any evidence, but want to join at the argument stage in order to oppose the passing a decree of specific performance in favour of the plaintiffs, as the land was being used by the village community as a whole. In view of the above, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the Appellate Court to provide an opportunity to the petitioners to argue the appeal from the side of the respondents. This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondents as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondents may move this court for recalling this order. August 27, 2009 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE