IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 23802 of 2011 Date of Decision: 20.12.2011 Jagjit Singh ........Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and other .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Petitioner in person. **** MAHESH GROVER,J. The petitioner was dismissed from service in the year 1975 which he challenged by filing civil suit which was dismissed by the learned trial Court and the appeal filed in appellate Court and subsequent regular second appeal filed before this Court were also dismissed. The SLP against the same was also dismissed. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a review petition which was dismissed. He also filed Civil Writ Petition No. 3046 of 2006 challenging the order dated 15.05.1981 passed by Additional District Judge, Karnal which was also dismissed. This was followed by SLP No. 7574 of 2006 which was dismissed on 08.05.2006. The petitioner then once again filed Civil Writ Petition Nos. 12296 and 12310 of 2007 praying for his reinstatement and challenging the certain provisions of the Police Act, 1861. These petitions were disposed of on 04.12.2007 whereupon the petitioner filed Civil Miscellaneous Nos. 4498 & 4499 for rehearing/review of the R.S.A. The same were also dismissed. Another SLP was filed, which was withdrawn by the petitioner. C.W.P. No. 23802 of 2011 -2- The petitioner now once again has filed instant petition with the prayer that stigma of illegal possession of government quarter be removed by expunging remarks to that effect. On due consideration of matter, I am of the opinion that in the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, this Court cannot grant the prayer which has been made by the petitioner. In view of the peculiar background of the case and keeping in view the fact that the said remarks are a part of the proceedings against the petitioner recorded earlier and subsequently amalgamated into the order of dismissal which he challenged unsuccessfully. It also seems that the petitioner is a habitual litigant and has filed the present petition with no coherent, grievance and prayer. Dismissed. 20.12.2011 (MAHESH GROVER) shabha JUDGE