IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 22ND DECEMBER 2011 / 1ST POUSHA 1933 WP(C).No. 34701 of 2011(K) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. JITHIN JINCE.M, S/O.JINCE.M.N, AGED 22 YEARS, RESIDING AT MOOTHEDATH HOUSE, KANJANY.P.O, THIRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. VANDANA.R.S, PARVATHY, DASARADHAVASTHU CITY, KALLEKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. SRUTHY.M, PATTATHAYIL HOUSE, GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. NAVNEETH.K.N, KERACHAN HOUSE, THALIKULAM P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 635. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 635. R1 & R2 BY ADV.SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DG WP(C).No. 34701 of 2011(K) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 07.12.2011. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 07.12.2011. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER DATED 07.12.2011. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER DATED 07.12.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE DG ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).34701/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 22nd day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of certain papers in the 5th semester B.Tech supplementary Examination vide Exts.P1 to P4 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs