1 Criminal Application No.1024/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1024 OF 2010 Mudassir s/o Kazi Zahir Mohiuddin & ors. ... APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & anr. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri P.N. Surwase Patil, Advocate for applicants Shri V.H. Dighe, A.P.P. for respondent No.1. Mrs. Sanghmitra Wadmare, Advocate for respondent No.2. ..... CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 11th February, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard. In an incident dated 12.1.2008, since police did not activate to discharge their legal obligation, the complainant approached the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, at Jalna, wherein directions in terms of Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code were sought and learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class has accordingly issued such directions. 2. It is clear, reading F.I.R. that the accused from one group of persons while the complainant from other, are known to each other, which loses significance whether accused was shown at 2 Criminal Application No.1024/2010 the police station or not. On the contrary, it appears, it was placed before the learned Sessions Judge while entertaining the bail application. Since last one year of the event, the present application is not pressed. The accused/ applicant have made their presence scarce and counsel for the complainant informed that even the warrants are issued, which the police having join hands with the accused, have not implemented. Such exercise calls for deprecation. Application lacks, merits, dismissed. K.U. CHANDIWAL JUDGE fmp/cri1024.10