IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.34 of 2009 DINESH PRASAD Versus RAMAUTAR SINGH & ORS ----------- 2 15.1.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner. Once the objection of the petitioner was only with regard to questioning the bonafide of the plaintiff and his impersonation as with regard to filing of the suit and the court after examining the plaintiff in person became satisfied, as is clearly recorded in the impugned order, that the suit so filed was by the plaintiff himself, there was nothing more to be done in this respect by the petitioner. That being so, this application, is wholly misconceived in as much as there is no error in the impugned order. It is however made clear that the other issues as raised by the petitioner including the one relating to the maintainability of the suit would still be required to be gone into at the time of final disposal of the suit in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observation and direction this Civil Revision Application is dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)