2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 226 OF 2010 Suryakant Krushi Kendra Prop.Suryakant Dattatrya Patil VERSUS Kate Balasaheb Krushi Kendra Prop. Raju Ramchandra Patil & others. None present for petitioner. Mr.V.D.Rakh,A.P.P. for respondent-State Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders PER COURT : 1] None appears for the petitioner. The Criminal Writ Petition is not maintainable, hence it is dismissed. Later-on : 2] At 2.30 P.M. the learned Counsel for the petitioner appeared and he prayed that the order of dismissal of Writ petition be restored; and further stated that the present Writ petition is not maintainable, but Criminal Revision Application is maintainable against the impugned order. 2 3] The petitioner is allowed to convert the present Writ Petition in Criminal Revision Application. Amendment be carried out forthwith. 4] Stand over after one week. Sd/- DT: 15TH MARCH,2010 [A.V.NIRGUDE,J.] MTK/