IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH MAY 2008 / 7TH JYAISHTA 1930 RP.No. 521 of 2008(C) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.10320/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS: ------------------------------- 1. ATTINAD GOLD SOUK PVT. LTD., RAJADHANI BUILDINGS, EAST FORT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. S. ABDUL JABBAR, SON OF SHAHUL HAMEED, AGED 54 YEARS, AMC XVII/979, ATTINGAL-695 101. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR SRI.LEO GEORGE RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. DENA BANK, T.C.37/1392, RAJADHANI BUILDINGS, EAST FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. 2. AUTHORISED OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER, DENA BANK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY PHILIP VARGHESE THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/05/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------- R.P.No.521/2008 in W.P.(C).No.10320/2008-C ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of May 2008 O R D E R Review petition is filed seeking modification of the direction in the judgment requiring the petitioner to pay the balance amount in three equal monthly instalments. The prayer now made is that this should be modified and the petitioner should be allowed to pay the amount in six equal monthly instalments. 2. Going by the writ petition, the request made was only for six months time to liquidate the liability out of which four months have already been granted. Therefore, the prayer now made is beyond the prayer that was made in the writ petition itself. Even otherwise, despite the limited scope of interference in the writ petition, this Court has already shown indulgence to the petitioner once and it would not be proper for this Court to continue the same. Review petition is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) ms