IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 14TH KARTHIKA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1099 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.8495/2004 Dated 23/01/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- V.M. PRABHAKARAN, S/O. LATE MADHAVAN, AGED 61 YEARS, RETD., TOWN PLANNING AND BUILDING INSPECTOR, RESIDING AT PRASANTHY, MUHAMMA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DIST. BY ADV. SMT.P.V.ASHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- SRI. MURALEEDHARAN I.A.S, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER) DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS, DIRECTORATE OF URABN AFFAIRS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. DILIP MOHAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J ............................................... Cont. Case No. 1099 of 2009 ................................................. Dated this the 5th day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T The counsel for the petitioner submits that presently the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and therefore the contempt case may be closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach this case again, if there are any fresh grievances. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach this court again if occasion arises. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE rhs