Writ Petition No. 1014 (SS) of 2005 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Heard Sri S.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri D.S. Patni, learned counsel for the respondents no. 1 and 2 and Sri Sudhir Singh learned counsel for respondent no.3. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 15th June, 2005 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 749 (SS) of 2005 (Ishwar Chandra Srivastava Vs. Uttaranchal Pey Jal Nigam), consequently, the present writ petition may be decided in terms of the aforesaid judgement. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is finally disposed of in terms of judgement and order dated 15th June, 2005 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 749 (SS) of 2005 (Ishwar Chandra Srivastava Vs. Uttaranchal Pey Jal Nigam). 22.07.2005 (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) S.K.S.