{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 533 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISOIN APPLICATION NO.406 OF 2006 Dayanand Venkatrao Salunke APPLICANT VERSUS Vyankatesh Industries & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.R.P.Adgaonkar, advocate for applicant Mr.N.B.Patil, APP for State Mr.V.T.Sakolkar, Advocate for respondents 1A to 1D ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 5th February 2010 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Issue notice to respondents. Mr.Sakolkar, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1A to 1D and learned APP accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. 2. For the grounds stated in the application and by consent, the application is allowed in terms of “A”, “B” and “C” and stands disposed of. Applicant to carry out the necessary amendment in the revision application forthwith. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln533-0 {2} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISOIN APPLICATION NO.406 OF 2006 Dayanand Venkatrao Salunke APPLICANT VERSUS Vyankatesh Industries & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.R.P.Adgaonkar, advocate for applicant Mr.N.B.Patil, APP for State Mr.V.T.Sakolkar, Advocate for respondents 1A to 1D ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE: 5th February 2010 PER COURT: 1. Non bailable warrant issued against the applicant is stayed till further orders. S.O. to 24.02.2010. Copy of this order, duly authenticated, be provided to the applicant on request. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/A10/criapln533-0