1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.1773 OF 1994 Bank of Baroda ..Plaintiff V/s. M/s.Sea Farers Welfare Fund Society & ..Defendants ors Mr.Nitin Parekh i/b.M/s.M.K.Ambalal & Co., Advocate, for the plaintiff Mr.S.K.Nair, Advocate, for the defendant No.3 CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATE : 18TH OCTOBER, 2008 P.C. . The above suit was on board for framing of issues on 9th September, 2008. The learned Single Judge passed an order that if on the next date the plaintiff's representative failed to remain present, the suit would be dismissed. Today, when the matter is called out, the learned counsel for the plaintiff states that inspite of correspondence there is no response from the plaintiff. Mr.S.K.Nair, the learned counsel for the defendant No.3 states that on account of the supervening events nothing subsists for consideration in the said 2 suit and that is probably the reason why the plaintiff is not appearing inspite of correspondence by its Solicitors. 2. In view thereof, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution. (R.M.SAVANT, J.)