IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No. 5396 of 2009 Date of decision : April 02, 2009 Dayanand ...... Petitioner (s) v. State of Haryana and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Devinder Punia, Advocate for the petitioner. *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to deny that he has not filed any reply to the letter (Annexure P-5). However, he vehemently argued that a perusal of the letter (Annexure P-5) reveals that the authorities have already pre-judged the issue and that it is clear that they will terminate the services of the petitioner after considering his reply and without holding any regular inquiry. I find that these apprehensions have not been substantiated. In my opinion, the letter (Annexure P-5) no where rules out that the procedure as envisaged by the orders (Annexure P-2) will not be followed. Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed as pre-mature. ( AJAY TEWARI ) April 02, 2009. JUDGE `kk'