1 9 caf 6061.08.doc K IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6061 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.28716 OF 2008 Union of India ..Applicant. Vs. Asha Ashok Kamble & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.Nilam Jadhav i/b Mr.Suresh Kumar for applicant. CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. DATED : 06/01/2011. PC: 1 Heard learned counsel for applicant. Though the respondents are served, learned counsel appearing on behalf of them remained absent when matter was called out. 2 The present appeal is preferred by original respondent under section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 against the judgment and decree dated 14th July, 2008 passed by learned Member (Technical), Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, Bench Mumbai. 3 The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant states that there is delay of 58 days in filing the present appeal. 2 9 caf 6061.08.doc Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant and the averments made in civil application, civil application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads as under: “a) That this Hon’ble High Court be pleased to condone the delay of 58 days in filing the appeal.” 4 Civil application disposed of accordingly. (K.K.Tated, J.)