[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 300/2008 RICHHPAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN DATE: 31.03.2008. HON'BLE MR. K.S. RATHORE, J. Mr. Amit Singh Shekhawat for the complainant- petitioner. Mr. B.S. Chhaba, Public Prosecutor for the State. **** The present criminal revision petition under Sections 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 25.02.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Sikar in Sessions Case No. 22/2007, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 319 Cr.P.C. has been rejected. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the prosecutrix Santra in her cross-examination has clearly stated that Prem was the person who abducted her. The Court below while rejecting the application of the petitioner moved under Section 319 Cr.P.C., has not properly considered the role of Prem which clearly reveals from the cross- examination of Santra. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the the interest of [2] justice, this Court deem it proper to quash and set aside the order impugned dated 25.02.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Sikar and remand the matter back to the Court below for fresh adjudication with the direction to pass fresh order after giving opportunity of being heard to the parties and after considering the statement of Santra. The revision petition stands allowed accordingly. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/