FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.99 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10907 OF 2008 (Shri Prabhakar Govindrao Kote Vs. Shri Kailas Govind Kote & ors.) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Shri P.S. Gaikwad, Advocate for the appellant-absent Shri S.P. Shah, Advocate for respondent No.5. ... CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED: 13th December, 2010 1. Matter is again called, counsel for appellant absent. Rejection of injunction against subsequent purchaser including brother is questioned by the plaintiff in Appeal from Order. The respondent No.1 prima facie received the property in partition. Thereafter he developed it into non- agricultural user and respondent No.5 is the subsequent purchaser of the property along with others. Considering status of the property, it is difficult at this stage to believe that there was any preemptive right in favour of the appellant. The rejection does not call for any interference. Appeal from Order lacks merits, dismissed. Statement discharged. Consequently, Civil Application No.10907/2008 dismissed. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE fmp/ao99.08