II! Eil ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION fS1 N0. ^,^£0 OF 2010 PETITIONER ^Y.^ \" ^ ..-<^"'"...•••• ,..'-'^<f. ....-^ ^^^ .-^"Q^ '^•~'" ^p' ^*"^^ / .'^1 o^ .>!"' RESPONDENTS fsS^. ^i'sf' 'i .; ysrep iS.u'.i 1. Nashimuddin Son ofAbdul Naim, aged about 42 years, Resident of Village and Post Salka, Janpad Panchayat Udaypur, Tahsil Udaypur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through: the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Udaypur, District Surguja (C.G.). 4.'' The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). fS- 5. Gram Panchayat Palka, Janpad Panchayat Udaypur, District Surguja (C.G.), through the Sarpanch. ,s (f 6. Rajesh Paikra, Panchayat Karmi (Secretary), Village Jamdi, Janpad Panchayat Bhaiyathan, District Surguja (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IMDIA B,a" HIGH COURT OF CHHATFISOARH ATBILASPUR PETITIONER WMT PETmON fS) No. 3260 of2010 Nashimudin. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgaA & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OT WDIA SB: Hon'MeShri Saftsh K. Aeirihotri. J. Present: Noneforlfaepetitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer farthe State. OROEKfORAL) (Passed on 19th day ofJuly, 2011) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of Ifae petiti<mer. The petitianermay aot bemterestedm pursuingthe matter. Li view ofthe above, the matta- is disnrissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge —•»• Ashok ~