IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18075 of 2010 DADAN RAM (CHAMAR) @ MUNNA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 25.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail since 03.10.2007 in a case registered under sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the F.I.R. was against unknown but subsequently petitioner’s name sprang up in the confessional statement of one Jogendra Singh. Moreover, it is submitted that nothing has been recovered from the petitioner and he has no criminal antecedent at present. It is further submitted that said Jogendra Singh, from whose possession there was recovery also, has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 10725 of 2008, vide order dated 27.03.2008. The Computer report, enclosed with the record, suggests that Baban Sah, Ashok Kumar, Bipin Kumar, Mohan Singh, Hanuman Ram and Mantu Singh have also been granted bail. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. - 2 - Considering the fact that petitioner’s name sprang up in the confessional statement of co-accused Yogendra Singh who has been granted bail and some other accused persons have also been granted bail and there is no recovery from the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Karakat P.S.Case No. 55 of 2007. Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate will not accept the bail bond of the petitioner if any criminal case is pending against the petitioner. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) BTiwary/