IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (CA N0. é3\ /2011 / PETITIONER Gyan Dutt Mishra, Son of late Prithvipal Mishra, aged about 7O years, R/o. Vrindavan Colony, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. I Chief Information Commissioner, State Information Commission, Nirmal Chhaya Building, Mira Datar Road, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner/Public Information Officer, Bastar Division, District Jagdalpur (C.G.), Public Information Officer/ Collector Jagdalpur, District — Baster (C.G.) - Public Information Officer, Office of Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Moha1 Shrivastava. J. O3-02-2011 Shri Atanu Ghos'n, counsel Heard. The limited grievance raise by the petitioner in this petition is that though the petitioner has preferre an appeal before the $tate information Commission, the appeal has rema ned Undecided even after Iapse of one year. At this stage, i am not incline to issue any hotice. c the petitioner. f However, in the circumstan of the case, it would be proper to tinally dispose off this petition with a directi n. Accordingly, it is directed tha the appeal tiled by the petitioner before respondent No.1 shall be decided e peditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receip of copy of this order. With the aforesaid directions, he petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [WIN Ii .