[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1082/2007 BHAGIRTH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. DATE: 25.04.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE Mr. Manish Sharma for Mr. Anoop Dhand for the complainant- petitioner. Mr. B.S. Chhaba, Public Prosecutor for the State. **** Brief facts of the case are that on 02.09.2004 when the petitioner Bhagirath, Shyamlal and Babulal were cultivating the field at village Mandawara, all of a sudden the accused-respondents entered into the field and started abusing the complainant-petitioner and other persons by calling caste names and manhandled with them, upon which the petitioner lodged first information report at Police Station Sadar, Sikar against the accused- respondents. After investigation, the police submitted charge-sheet against the accused-respondents for the offences under Sections 341, 323 IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act. Thereafter charges for the aforesaid offences were framed against the accused-respondents which they denied and claimed trial. During trial, the prosecution examined as many as 4 witnesses namely PW1 Shyamlal, PW2 [2] Bhagirath, PW6 Babulal and PW7 Mukesh. The statements of the accused-respondents were recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C. After completion of the trial, the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Sikar, vide its impugned judgment dated 21.06.2007, acquitted the accused- respondents from the offences under Sections 341, 323 IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment dated 21.06.2007, the complainant petitioner has preferred the instant criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. I have heard learned counsel for the complainant-petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and have also carefully gone through the impugned judgment dated 21.06.2007. The Court below vide its impugned judgment dated 21.06.2007, acquitted the accused-respondents on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties and the same was attested by the Court. Further PW1 Shyamlal and PW2 Bhagirath in their cross examination have not corroborated the story of the prosecution. After considering each and every aspect including the statements of the witnesses and the material available on record, since the prosecution utterly failed to prove the offences under Sections 341, 323 IPC and Section 3 (1)(x) of the SC/ST Act against the accused- [3] respondents and further the parties have entered into a compromise, therefore, on the basis of the compromise, the accused-respondents have been acquitted by the Court below vide impugned judgment dated 21.06.2007. This Court do not find any illegality or error in the impugned judgment dated 21.06.2007 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Sikar and the same requires no interference whatsoever by this Court. Consequently, the criminal revision petition fails being devoid of merit and the same is hereby dismissed. (K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/