THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.4567 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.483 of 2006 in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Proddatur, against the respondent, for the relief of declaration of title and perpetual injunction, in respect of the suit schedule property. The plaint was amended once. Issues were framed and recording of evidence was closed. At that stage, the petitioner filed I.A.No.863 of 2010 under Order VII Rule 14(3) of C.P.C., with a prayer to permit him to file a certified copy of the document No.4419/1960. The application was dismissed by the trial Court, through order, dated 21.08.2010. The same is challenged in this revision. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The issues were settled in the year 2008 itself. Nowhere in the plaint that was amended once, there is any reference to the document, which is sought to be marked. Further, in a suit for injunction simplicitor, the petitioner does not have to make any effort to prove his title. The trial Court had assigned cogent reasons for dismissing the application. As long as the plaint remains in its present form, the document sought to be marked, has no relevance. The C.R.P. is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.06.10.2010. GJ