IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3925 OF 2004 Anandgram Society Dudulgaon & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus Mrs.Shaikh Nasim Hameed & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.A.P.Vanarse for Petitioners. Mr.A.M.Joshi for Respondent No.1. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. AUGUST 16, 2004. AUGUST 16, 2004. AUGUST 16, 2004. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In view of the finding reached by the Tribunal in Para 12 of the impugned Judgment, the Tribunal was justified in allowing the appeal preferred by the private Respondents and passing appropriate orders while allowing the appeal. I find no reason to take a different view, much less, to doubt the correctness of the finding of fact reached by the Tribunal which is supported by the materials on record. Not a case for interference in exercise of writ jurisdcition. Dismissed. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.