..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.574 OF 2004 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.574 OF 2004 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.574 OF 2004 Smt.Vrinda Sharad Bal ...Petitioner. Versus Versus Versus Jivprabha Charitable Trust and 3 Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr.Shailesh Kanitkar i/b. Mr.G.S.Godbole, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.M.M.Deshmukh, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : JULY 31, 2006. DATED : JULY 31, 2006. DATED : JULY 31, 2006. P.C.: 1. Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioner-original accused No.1 and learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.1(a) & 1(b) - original complainants. The Petitioner is seeking discharge in R.C.C.No.114 of 2000, which is pending before the learned J.M.F.C., Court No.9, Pune. The learned Advocate for the Respondent Nos.1(a) & 1(b), on instructions, states that the matter has been settled between the parties. In view of this statement, nothing survives in the present Petition and it is disposed of as such. ..(2).. 2. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner states that he has no such instructions. In case, the matter is not settled between the parties, liberty to the petitioner to revise the present Petition. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)