FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directios and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS __________________________________________________________________________________________ 4 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 63 OF 2011 THE PROPREITOR OF M/S RAJ CYCLE STORES NAMPUR DIST NASIK VERSUS THE PROPRIETOR OF M/S JAYHIND CYCLE AND MOTOR CO LKOPERGAON DIST AHMEDNGAR AND AN ... Advocate for applicant : Mrs. Ansari A.N. APP for Respondent(s): Mr. S.G. Nandedkar Advocate for Respondent 1 : Mr. A.C. Darandale ... CORAM : A. V. POTDAR, J. Dated: September 14, 2011 ... 1 Present revision application is filed against the judgment and order in Criminal Appeal no. 12/2005 dated 17-3-2011 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, by which he dismissed the criminal appeal filed by the revision applicant against the judgment and order dated 16-7-2005 by which the applicant was convicted for offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and was sentenced to suffer SI for one year. He was also directed to pay compensation to the tune of Rs. 83,966/- to the complainant in STC no. 920/2001. 2 Today when the revision application came up for final hearing, learned counsel for applicant and respondent placed on record compromise precipe by which the parties have settled the dispute out of the court as FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directios and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS __________________________________________________________________________________________ the entire due amount was paid by the revision applicant to the respondent / original complainant. Representatives of both the parties who are identified by their respective counsel are present in the court today and signed the compromise precipe in the court. 3 By virtue of amendment to the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1981, section 147 was introduced which permits the parties to compound the offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. As the offence is compoundable under the provisions of law and the original complainant does not intend to prosecute further, the sentence recorded by way of impugned judgment against the applicant is required to be quashed and set aside. Accordingly, the impugned judgment is quashed and set aside. Revision application is allowed in terms of compromise. Revision stands disposed of accordingly. Bail bonds of applicant stand cancelled. ( A. V. POTDAR, J. ) dyb