l-... -OU E,. ? ^••S» yNSLE 8ENGH BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARjLAT BILASPUR (C.G.1 WRIT PETITION [01 N0.6S2-S OF 2011 PETITIONER Dinesh Kum.ar Agrawal S/o Late Shri Mahabir Prasad Agrawal, Aged about 54 years, Occupation - Business, R/o Opposite of Main Hospital, Cinni Sales Company, Raigarh, Tahsil & Dista-ict- Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS -'\..^^/ -y^/ ..^y ^/^y /y7 ^y/ ^.. 1] State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Urban Administration and Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) <' 2] Municipal Corporation, Raigarh, Through- Coramissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raigarh, Tahsil 8s .District- Raigarh (C.G.). 1/' 3] The Collector, Raigarh Raigarh (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUENCE OF WRIT OR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS UNDER THE FACTS AND <r^ ?/'y.^\CIRCUMDTANCES OF THE CASE. ^>-~N^V '' ^'%>\ PARTICULARS ABOUT THE PETITIONERfS) : As mentioned in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE RESPONDENT(S) : As mentioned in the cause title. 3. PARTICULARS OF THE CAUSE/ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETITION IS MADE : ^'.St. P l|....-,s-2!SS. 1 'i'VRl!iSs^i. "^ "^.^S3S: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT PETLTION (CLN0.6323_QF 2011 Dinesh KumarAgrawal Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri S.K. Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General forthe State. Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent No.2. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 21st day of October, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not received any notice in respect of the petition scheduled -land, however, the process of demolition has already taken place by the respohdent No.2. 2. At this juncture, Shri Murthy, learned Dy. Adv. General appearing for the State and Shri Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 submif that no demolition on the part of respondent authorities shall be taken without following the due process of law. 3. In view of the above, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudication, at this stage. 4. Accordingly.thewritpetitionisdisposedof. __ Ashok Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge