c<^' IK 'EES. HXGH C013RI ©T •J13©IC®^?EI3AT BIIi&SPUR W.&. HG<1^?y2003 £3E(E.ZTIO£3BK ^ <^^ ^^..•••" ^^^^ ^.^^s^ s- ^Ohaastayain. Ve.aia Si/e fcate ShrjL Baliram Temia^ age. 51 years^ 'JuBJlei:. &cc©u^t^ffxoex.^ S^egieiaal ^raasp@rt ©ffiGe.Raipur^ E/<? peasi©Bbada;.G@l^^^Quarter l^e^ D-11, Kaipu^- ( C»G» } '^ersn.s s- 1. State ©fCNiattisgarh, 'Ehxreugh S@c xetaxy Pinance & PlanaiBg- iMinistry^ ' S<K<S.,. B^'ara^ Karpur,. ^aip^r ' ('" c ^G ^.) / ' - ' . "; / 2. .State,@f Chhattisgarh, 'Ehrei^h 5%cxretary Hwie C Tra^sp^ tfc)n: •departmeiit Minist.x'y^'B.oK»@<.' BhaN'a^ Raipury Raipur < c»©"<»3-• 3-» : Sraasp^rfc C©mmissi©ne-r. - Chhattlsgarh Biaip^^^ 647 aavi^a gar- C©l©iyRaipur ( G^G^ ) 4^ 2y*gi©BalT^a^isp^rt G£ficer Raiptir^ fia&g.B^- 4 S^s» QhamtaM. R.oad.'. Dgvpurl : ita'j.p^jE:. ( C^G^ ) 5* Sire^t@r of i^iatiea ChhafctlsgBrh Baipur^- Q^K»S» Bha^aji Baxpur-- ( G»o«")" : •"•:. aRTICI®' 226/ 2T:< ' S. e ®I>ZTU%I»., ^/ ^. HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI H.L. DATTU, C.J. Wrjt PetjtJpnNo.1767 of 2003 Petitioner: ResRondents: Ghanshyam Verma Versus State of Chhattisgarh and others Present: Ms. Deepali Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Government Advocate forthe State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 1st March, 2007) When the petition was called out for hearing, none appeared nor any representation was made on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in the matter. 2. In the circumstance, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. ; Sd/- Chief Justice