IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2009 / 10TH ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 16469 of 2007(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.V.KURIAKOSE, S/O.THANNIKKODAN VARKEY, AGED 60 YEARS, PANDALAMPADAM, PANNIYANKARA (PO), PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.N.KRISHNANKUTTY ACHAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MUHAMMED MOOSA, S/O AHAMED RAWTHER, CHEKKAMATHARA, MUDAPPALLOOR (PO), ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2. M.A.NAZER, S/O MUHAMMED SAHIB, TAJ MANZIL, KUZHALMANNAM, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3. T.V.POULOSE, HILL PRODUCE DEALER, VADAKKANCHERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH FOR R1 SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. ----------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 16469 OF 2007 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of July, 2009 J U D G M E N T Pius C.Kuriakose, J. On behalf of the learned senior counsel Sri.P.N.Krishnankutty Achan, Smt.Sohara very forcefully sought for adjournment of the case. Mr.V.Chitambaresh, learned senior counsel submits that the respondent landlord in whose favour the impugned order was passed, has ceased to have any interest in the property. He has assigned all his interests in favour of a third party. Sri.Chitambaresh submitted that the first respondent in this writ petition who is the beneficiary of the impugned order is not going to take advantage of the impugned order and take any steps in furtherance of the impugned order. We record the above submission. Writ petition is closed. (PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE) (P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE) ksv/