"•w w'l Writ Petition iS) No. 1S98 ofSOOS Vinod Tamboii. S/o. Late Shn Sameia, afied about 49 yssrs; P3.t'A/3n, Pstvy'ar' H^iks No.27. Tifrs, Tehsi! and Distt. Bilaspur. 1} State of Chhattisgaiti, t'nrough the Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ra'pur, c/ 2). The Coilecter, Bilaspui-. 3) The Tansiidar, Bliaspur 4) The Revenue tnspector, Biiaspur. 5) Shri Hemant Patanwar, Patwari, Patwari Haika No,30, Slrgitti, Tahsii and D'stt. Biiaspur, ivVrit Petftion under Articie 226 ofthe ConstiSufton of India') SB: Hon'bte iVir. Satish K. Agnihotrs, J. Shri Utkarsh Verma, counsel for the petittoner. •Shri A.S. Kaohhawaha. C"/. Advocate Generai for fche State. With consent of learned counse! appearlng for both the parties, the matter Is taken up for hearinci finaiiy. 2) Lea.'ned counsei appearing for the respondents/State submits that the order dated 20-12-2007, irthere is no other modified order, snall be given effsot to .n its ietter and sDirit. •"t^ 3) In vieworthe categorical statement made by iearneti counsei in all fairness, iearned counsei for the petitioner submits that nothing sur.ives in this petition. 4) Needfui shall be done as sariy as possibte, preferabiy within a period of two weeKS. 5) Aocordingiy, the petition is disposed of. Consequentiy, i.A.?<io.1 siands teposed of. -A_ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge