BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Eighth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15499 of 2011 THANGAM ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKKOTATI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT CR NO. 1566/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. P.ILAYARAJA Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as A2 and he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324, 323 and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.1566 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Heard Mr.P.Ilayaraja, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) would submit in his argument that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners there should be a stringent condition for the accused persons. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukkottai and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukkottai https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 28/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKOTTAI. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKKOTATI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. P.ILAYARAJA Advocate SR.No.41619 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15499 of 2011 Date :28/11/2011 RJ/29.11.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/