HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR @ WRIT PETITION No. 2121 of2001 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 3,: t'” K P“ “La SB: Hon’ble shri Satish K. Agnihotn'. J. Present: Shri Anand Dadariya, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Alok Bakshi, Government Advocate for the State/respondems 1 to 3. ORAL ORDER l. (Passed on 24E; day of September, 2008) By this petition, the petitioner impugis the order dated 20.05.1993 (Annexure P/16) and the order dated 17.03.1986 (Annexure P/17) in this petition. The petitioner has filed earlier a writ petition being M.P. No. 2468/1993 impugning the above V stated orders. The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution on 17.7. 1997. Thereatter, the petitioner tiled an application for restoration of the petition in M.C.C. No. 172/2000. The case was considered on merit and the same was dismissed on 24.02.2001. Consequently, the application for restoration was rej ected. The petitioner has preferred this petition irnpugning the same orders ‘ which have sought to be impugned in the earlier petition which stood dismissed by the High Court of Judicature of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur. It is a trite law that no second petition for the same relief arising from the ‘ ‘ same causevof action is maintainable. Thus. this petition is dismissed as not maintainable. No order asto costs. Consequently, LA. No. 4617/2001: application for urgent hearing, stands disposed of. g . Sd/- Satish K, Agrihomi Judge " w .r ‘i PETITIONER Tilak Das S/o Shri Ram Bairagi aged about 59 years R/o Byron Bazar, Raipur. VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Raipur. 2. Collector, Raipur (M.P.) 3. Nail) Tahsildar, Raipur (M.P.) 4. M.M.Qureshi S/o Abdul Latif Qureshi, Rfo Byron Bazar, Raipur.