HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated Nainital the 19th June, 2006 Bail Application No. 519 of 2006 Order on the bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Sanjay Kumar S/o Mahendera Singh R/o Bhaunri P.S. Jawalapur Tehsil & District Haridwar …... Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ….... Opposite Party _____________________________________________________________ In Case Crime No.67 of 2006 U/s 363, 366 IPC Police Station – Laksar District - Haridwar _____________________________________________________________ Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Heard Sri Sanjeev Singh learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. Perused the record. It was contended that in the statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. the victim has stated that she was enticed away by the applicant and thereafter she was taken to Saharanpur from where she was left. It was further contended that according to the version of the FIR the victim was seen in the house of Balak Ram, Resham and Mausam by the witnesses who informed the informer. It was contended that there are two versions in the matter. It was contended that the story as has been put forward is not believable. The FIR was lodged after two days. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case in totality, it is a fit case for bail at this stage. Let the applicant-accused be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Dated 19.06.2006 (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Negi