IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20804 of 2009 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH @ PINKU SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 29.06.2009 Heard both sides. The sole petitioner seeks regular bail in a case instituted under Sections 364A, 302 and 201 of the Penal Code. The son of the informant was kidnapped for ransom. In course of investigation, the name of the petitioner transpired as one of the facilitators of the crime. The kidnapped boy is still traceless. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that he is an accused in one another case as well. It is further contended that other co-accuseds of the present case were put on trial and have been acquitted. It is further highlighted that he is in custody since 19.03.2006. From the impugned order it appears that the charges have already been framed in the trial. Having regard to the allegations and the materials available on record, this Court while rejecting his application observes as under: Let the learned trial Court conclude the trial itself on or before 31st of October, 2009, failing which the learned Trial Court shall enlarge the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge 2 ( Fast Track Court No. 4), Samastipur, in connection with Bidyapati Nagar P.S. Case No. 14 of 2006 in Sessions Trial No. 737 of 2007. In the event the petitioner is granted bail in terms of the aforesaid order, the same shall be conditioned in the following manner:- (a) One of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner (b) The petitioner shall appear in person on the date fixed at the trial. In the event of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the learned trial Court shall have liberty to cancel his bail bond and secure his arrest in accordance with law. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)