IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10064 of 2011 Date of Decision:12.12.2011 Surinder Kumar .... Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others . .. Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anjum Ahmed, Addl. A.G. Haryana. Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.3. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant the annual increments w.e.f. 2003 on ward, when the petitioner was promoted as clerk. It is contended that the matter is squarely covered by the judgement rendered by this Court in CWP No.5566 of 1999 decided on 2.9.2001 titled as Prithvi Raj V. State of Haryana and others (P-2). Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.3 does not dispute that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No.5566 of 1999 decided on 2.9.2001 titled as Prithvi Raj V. State of Haryana and others (P-2). In view of the above, the present petition is allowed in the CWP No.10064 of 2011 -2- same terms as passed in CWP No.5566 of 1999 decided on 2.9.2001 titled as Prithvi Raj V. State of Haryana and others (P-2). 12.12.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE