IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 1213 of 2009 Date of Decision: 27.09.2010 Tarsem Kumar .... Petitioner Versus Prem Lata and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Ms. Rupinder Basanti, Advocate for Mr. Sunil Agnihotri, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. G.S. Punia, Advocate for respondent No. 1 Ms. Harveen Kaur, Advocate for respondent No. 2 ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner seeks adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel Mr. Sunil Agnihotri is suffering from fever. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 while showing photostat copy of the judgment of the trial Court dated 9.8.2010 stated that suit itself has been decided by the trial Court, hence, present petition has rendered infructuous. In the present petition order impugned is on the application filed by the plaintiff-petitioner seeking permission to lead secondary evidence. In view of the fact that suit has already been decided by the trial Court, present petition has rendered infructuous. Photocopy of the judgment dated 9.8.2010 is taken on record. Dismissed as infructuous. (ALOK SINGH) 27.09.2010 JUDGE reena