IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 20832 of 2008 Date of Decision: Dec. 11, 2008 Harbans Singh .................................................. Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ................................ Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashutosh Mohunta Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta Present: Mr. Gurnam Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. .... ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J. (Oral) In pursuance to the advertisement dated 5.9.2007 (Annexure P14) the petitioner applied for the post of JBT/ETT Teacher. The petitioner was sent an interview call letter for 16.3.2008 but according to the petitioner he was not interviewed. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is more qualified than respondent Nos. 4 and 5 who have been selected. A perusal of the aforementioned facts clearly shows that the petitioner was sent an interview letter but he chose not to appear. In case the respondent authorities did not hold the interview of the petitioner on 16.3.2008 then the petitioner should have approached this Court immediately. Thus, it is clear that it is the petitioner who deliberately chose to remain absent from the interview. In view of the above, we find no merit in the writ petition and the same is dismissed. ( ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA ) JUDGE ( RAJAN GUPTA ) JUDGE 11.12.2008 rupi