IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25800 of 2009 SOVIT RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 26.8.2009 Heard. The order dated 24.8.2009 by which the petitioner Sovit Rai has been directed to be released appears erroneous and an order which could not have been passed in the facts of the case directing release of the petitioner on bail inasmuch as the petitioner is the assailant of the deceased. That part of the order dated 24.8.2009 by which the petitioner was directed to be released on execution of a bond as indicated in that order is hereby recalled and the same is directed to be substituted by the following lines that “the petitioner being the assailant of the deceased the petition is dismissed.” If the cost has been deposited by the petitioner, it shall be refunded to him. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)