IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH & THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CONTEMPT CASE No.1502 of 2010 In W.P.1938 of 2002 Between: J.Ram Babu ..... PETITIONER AND The Government of A.P. rep. by its Secretary, Finance & Planning Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 3 others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CONTEMPT CASE No.1502 of 2010 In W.P.1938 of 2002 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) This contempt case is filed complaining that the orders of this Court dated 24.08.2009 in WP.1938/2002 have been deliberately violated by the 3rd respondent herein. This Court by the aforesaid order, directed the respondents herein who are writ petitioners to consider the case of the petitioner herein for regularization in terms of G.O.Ms.No.212, Finance & Planning (FW.PC.III) Department, dated 22.04.1994, and in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of A.Manjula Bhashini vs. The Managing Director A.P.Women’s Cooperative Finance Corporation Ltd.[1] Counter is filed by the 3rd respondent stating that pursuant to the directions of this Court, the case of the petitioner was considered and rejected vide Memo No.FI-1/18700/2009 dated 16.04.2010 on the ground that though the petitioner was worked for five years as contemplated in G.O.Ms.No.212, but his remuneration was being paid from the Games Fees collected from the students and not from the Government funds and the service rendered by him is considered to be as private service. We are of the opinion that it may not be just and proper for this Court to consider the legality and validity of the rejection order dated 16.04.2010. We are not inclined to express any opinion with regard to the subject rejection order as it is always open for the petitioner to question the same before the appropriate authority. The Contempt Case is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to question the rejection order dated 16.04.2010, if he is so advised. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J ________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR,J Dated: 21.01.2011 Dsr [1] 2009(5) LD 58 (SC)