Criminal Misc. No. M-32942 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-32942 of 2010 Date of decision : 10.11.2010 Jatinder Kumar ....Petitioner V/s Bala Gupta ....Respondent BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. J.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. wherein orders passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) and Additional Sessions Judge Fast Track Court, Ludhiana (Annexure P-2) have been impugned. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the courts below have committed a grave error in rejecting the application of the petitioner for permission to send the disputed cheques to Government agencies to find out the age of the ink. According to learned counsel, it was necessary to find out the age of the ink as this was the material evidence before the courts below. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the orders passed by the courts below. The application of the petitioner was rejected on the ground that opinion of the expert regarding age of the ink was neither relevant nor sufficient expertise is available for determining the same. I do not find any Criminal Misc. No. M-32942 of 2010 2 legal infirmity with the orders passed by both the courts below. Needless to observe that petitioner will be at liberty to produce independent evidence in support of his case. Thus no case for interference in inherent jurisdiction of this court is made out. The petition is without any merit and the same is hereby dismissed. November 10, 2010 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE