1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2870 OF 2008 Arvind s/o Pundalik Tendulkar. ..... ..... Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..... ....... Respondents. Mr. Chandnani i/by M/s. Lexim Associates for the petitioner. Mr. V. P. Malwankar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI and S. S. SHINDE, JJ. DATED : 19TH JUNE, 2008. P.C.: It appears that there is a dispute between the petitioner and the private respondents and in these circumstances the petitioner has sought a relief from this Court that this Court should declare sale with regard to Survey No.38 situate at Village Chinchvan, Talhati Saja Shridhon, Taluka Panvel, Dist. Raigad, by respondent nos.3 to 6 in favour of respondent no.4 to be void ab-initio. We are afraid, such a relief this Court cannot grant. If, the petitioner is aggrieved of any sale having been executed in favour of respondent No.4 by respondent nos.3 to 6, the petitioner has remedies other than the remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 2. With regard to prayer (a)(ii), this Court cannot direct respondent nos.7 2 and 8 to demolish the structure constructed by respondent nos.3 to 6 as the only ground pleaded for issuing such a direction is that the sale between respondent no.4 and respondent nos.3 to 6 was illegal. The writ petition is misconceived. The Government Officials have been made parties only to file this petition. Otherwise the private disputes between the parties are tried to be projected in this writ petition. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is devoid of any merits and is, accordingly, dismissed. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (S. S. SHINDE, J.)