-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2891 OF 2011 Mr. Naresh Thakur & Ors. ..Petitioner. Versus Dy. Registrar, A Ward. ..Respondents. Mr. Kishore Patil for the petitioners. Mr. A. B. Vagyani, AGP. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : April 7, 2011. P. C. : 1. Not on board. Mentioned for production pointing out urgency. Production was granted. 2. Heard Mr. Kishor Patil, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Vagyani, learned AGP for the respondent-State. 3. The petitioner by this petition challenges the notice issued under section 78(1) of the MCS Act, 1960. Mr. Patil, learned counsel submitted that the petitioners have given reply to the said notice pointing out that there are no grounds for appointment of Administrator, however, they apprehend that respondent no.1 will supersede the managing committee of respondent no.2 by appointing an Administrator. He submitted that protection may be granted to the petitioner in case respondent no.1 decides to appoint administrator on the society. In these circumstances, in srp -: 2 :- my view, the petition can conveniently be disposed by passing following order. Hence, I pass following order. In the event respondent no.1 passes an order under section 78(1) of the MCS Act, 1960 appointing administrator on respondent no.2- society, the said order shall not be given effect to for the period of 15 days from the date of communication thereof to the petitioner. (RANJIT MORE, J.)