IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12301 of 2000 Between: K.Veera Raghavulu, S/o. K.Subramanyam, working as Assistant Physiotherapist, Balaji Institute of Surgery Rehabilitation and Research for the Disabled, Tirupati, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Kapilateertham Road, Tirupati. 2 The Director, Balaji Institute of Surgery Rehabilitation and Research for the Disabled, Tirupati, Chittoor District. 3 The Secretary to the Government, Revenue & Endowment - I Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the Respondents 1 & 2 in not considering the case of the petitioner for the promotion to Physio-Therapist in Balaji Institute of Surgery Rehabilitation & Research for the Disabled, Tirupathi and rejecting the same by their order ROC No. TL7/8610/99 dt. 22-3-2000 is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the rules and violative of the article 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India, consequently directing the Respondents 1 & 2 to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion as Physiotherapist in terms of G.O.Ms.No.166 Len & Te dt. 16-5-86 on par with the Medical & Health rules if necessary by getting the existing rules issued under G.O.Ms.No.1060 Revenue & Endowment Department dt. 24-10- 89 amended suitably by the 3rd Respondent in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders that are deemed fit and necessary. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.K.CHAKRAVARTHY Counsel for the Respondents: MS.P.SARADA The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. A memo to this effect is also filed with the Registry vide USR No.739 of 2009. Accordingly, permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J Date: 06.02.2009 va