IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14365 of 2010 The Rohtak Primary Krishi Coop.Society, Rohtak Vs. The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Rohtak & others. Present: Mr.S.P.Chahar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sandeep Singal, Advocate, for the caveator. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner-society had terminated the services of respondent No.3, who sought a reference and the dispute in regard to termination was referred for adjudication by the Labour Court. The stand of the petitioner-society before the Labour Court was that the enquiry was held and thereafter the services of respondent No.3 were terminated. The case of the respondent-workman, however, was that no enquiry was held and he was terminated arbitrarily. The petitioner-society could not lead any evidence to prove either the enquiry or the enquiry proceedings despite having given the opportunity. On this basis, it was held that the termination of the workman was in violation of the statutory provisions and hence the petitioner-society was alleged to have contravened the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act. The termination was set-aside and direction issued to reinstate respondent No.3 with 35% back wages. There is no ground made out to interfere in the well reasoned order passed by the Labour Court. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. August 13, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE