HIGE COURT £3? CHHAT’E‘ISGARH AT fJLASi’bR Wrif Peiition (C) N0. 1812 0i‘2{}€}8 33ET1T1ONER M/s Shri Bhawani Ago Products, Thraugh: Its Partner Narsmg Das Bhootda, S/o Late Shri Macian. Lal Ji Bhootcia: agad about 48 years, Regiszered Office, at Chamirakhuri, Digtrict Durg (CG). VMkSUS RES?01\3§}ENTS 1. Central Bank of India A company corporate, Constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Ti‘ansfer of I e Uniiertakixlg) Act, 1970, Through The Managing Director. Head Office at Chanoramukhi. Nariman ?oint Mumbai ( (Maharashtra). 2. The Regional Manager, Centre-J Bank of India, Regional Since, Raipur (CG). 3. Branch Managei‘ Central Bank of India, Branch Durg at Rungta Bhawan, GE Road, Burg, Districi Chhattisgarh (CG). WRH' PETITION UNDER AR'HCLE 226 OF lhL CONS'HTUHON OF TNDIA) (SB: Hon’bie Mr. :e‘atish K. AEm’non'i. J.) k E'esem' : Shri Braieek Shanna wiih Shri RR. Fatankar, Advocates for the ‘ neiiticner. None for the respondents. @RAL owhn {Pagaeé on 51h $9.? of Becembcr, 20%) 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition on 20.03.2008 against the notice dated 14.02.08 (Annexare W3), issued by the responrient Bank, under Section 13 (2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for snort 'the Act 20{)2’), for :recoveiy ofdues. Learned counsel anpearing for the petitioner sutnnits that the instant petition E) was fried on the/ground that no Presiding Ottieer in Debts Recovery Tribunai x% Kl ( yvuoiu‘u auvu. .‘ it is breught to the notice ofthis Court that Vide nOtiiicatiOIi dated 12. 11.2008 (Armsxure-A): Shri Narendm Kumay, Presiding Otiicer, Debts Recovery Tribumai, Lucknow, has bean authorized t0 discharge the functions ofPresiding Offacer, Dabts Recovery TribunaL iabalpur, in ac’idition to his own charge, with immediate offect. {cg KQ A. 7, $777 /.‘“m“r ‘ ,‘ . u; -‘ ‘ i, . n ;A_._.:x-J:.NL1,“...,. H »’ rm ‘ { wwggz’m i‘ has ah‘eaéy preiéxred anh @ané 110w the Presiding Ofiicer is available to hear the matters at Debts Recovery TributlaL Jabalpur, thie petition may be (l Kegf5crm‘?emi l5wmc . Learned counsel appem‘mg 101‘ the peimoner submlts that smce the pentloneri iiisposed ofwith liberty to the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy. . Having heard teamed counsei appearing for the parties and keeping in View of the facts that statutosy appea‘i is available under the yrovisicms of Seetioa 17 of a. IrQ/icmC} Oak/3(7))? LC ##Qkagrgm’) 1' the Act 2&02, amt thither that the EEtioner has ah‘eaéy tiied aikappea’, which tL' is endiiigH consideration before the DRT., Je‘oainur x a this petition i is Clisoosed i of .'.v (#Ktcdt‘aw" reserving Eberty to the petitioner to pursue the pendingwhetore the BET, L Eabaiour, for proper redreseal/adjudication ot‘the matter. No order asto costs. ‘. Consequentiy, pending apyiieations, it‘anyg stands disposed of. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri ‘Judge Sane wit Jr, twigittt'w; (new the? i JMdgtWJ EM wM/fij‘c‘lwif d’f HW‘mk cord/‘94; fft‘lpf-w ivx ‘i‘W’ {r‘a’ii‘at Vw ‘93 Wlgygcivf” aucNq-Z/Wt I L Sd/- F