^€3^^. •/~/":%- '\ I g J/ HIGH CQURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPIJR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 2926 of 2007 PBTITIONER RESPONDENTS 2. 3. 6. 7. Smt Raajeet Kaur W/o Shri Gurumukh Singh, Aged about 55 years, R/o A-l, Sai N^ar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS Stetc of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Departmeat of Co-operative Affairs, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Registrar, Co-operative Societics, Raipur (C.G.) Chhattisgarh State Co-operative Marketmg Pederation, a body registered under fhe provisions of Chliattisgarh Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, baviug its offlce at 880, Civfl Lines, Raipur (C.G.) Secretary, Department of Finance, Member of Marketing Federation Comnxittee, Maatralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Secretary, Food & Civfl SuppHes Department, Member of Marketin| Federation Comnuttee, Mantralaya Ralpur(C.G.) Director, Agriculture, Meinber of Marketing Pederation Comnuttee, Maatralaya, Raipiu- (C.G.) Mauaging Director, Chhattisgarh State Co-operative Agricultural & Rural Developiuent Baak Maiyadit, Raipiir, Meinber of Marketnug Federation Coiumittee, Raipur (CG.) Radha Krishna Gupta, Chairman of fhe marketing Federation Committee, R/o vfllage Maai (Salaka) Bedri Surajpur, District Ambikapur (C.Q.) y c f % ^. *,. ^ :'•! is>i£sS<3!i" 9. Sint. Heinlata Parte, Meinber of the Marketing Pederation Conunittec, R/o Kanker, District Ka&ker (C.G.) 10. Shri Chetandhar, Member of the Marketmg Federation Conumttee, R/o Seepat, Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 11. Shri Narayan Yadav, Member of the Marketing Pederation Coaunittee, R/o vittage Doma, Abhanpur, District Raipur (C.G.) 12. Shri Jiteshwar Yadav, Member of the Marketmg Pederation Committee, R/o village Dhargiya Bagau, Pathalgaou, Distnct Ambikapur (C.G.) WR1T PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OP THE CONSTITUTIQN QFJNDIA SB: Hoa'ble Shri Satish K. AanUiotrI, J. Shri Mateen Siddique, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Axnrito Das, Panel Lawycr for fhe State. OKDER (ORALt (Passed on 07<h day of July, 2009) 1. Learaed counsel appeanng for thc petitioner, on instructfons, seeks penaission of fhis Court to wlthdraw fhis petition on fhe ground that wifh fhe passage oftime, this petition has become inlructuous. 2. Leamed coimsel appearing for other side have no objection. 3. It is ordercd as prayed for, 4. Consequenfly, fhe writ petition is dism»sedas wiftidrawa. Sd/- . , SatishK.Agnihom ^^