IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33185 of 2011 Manwar @ Manowar Alam @ Md. Manowar, Son of Abdul Latif, Resident of Village-Anarkali, P.S.-Kochadhaman, District-Kishanganj. …..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Amal Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the State : APP. ---------------------------------- 02/ 28.09.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner is accused of the case which has been registered under Sections 376, 366, 372, 420, 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code. It has been alleged in the written report of Ziabul Rahman that Suleman solemnized Nikah on 06.04.2011 with Zinat Ara-daughter of the informant. Suleman was already married and having children. On 08.04.2011, Rahman and Saddam coame to the informant and took his daughter and Saukat Praveen on the pretext of showing house of Suleman. When Shaukat Praveen did not return, the case was lodged. Allegation against the petitioner is that he has assisted Suleman. Submission is that the petitioner was not at all connected with Suleman. So, no 2 offence under Sections 376, 366 of the Indian Penal Code are not made out. There was no evidence that the informant’s daughter was forced to illicit intercourse or the marriage was solemnized playing fraud by the petitioner. Only allegation against the petitioner is of extending help. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail is allowed. Let petitioner Manwar @ Manowar Alam @ Md. Manowar be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/court concerned, Kishanganj in connection with Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 46 of 2011. kksinha/- (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)