1 S.B.C.W. NO. 6480/2006 & another IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R (1) S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6480/06 Gupta Brothers Vs. The Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court, Bhilwara and Others. (2) S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6481/06 Gupta Brothers Vs. The Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court, Bhilwara and Others. Date of Order : : 10.02.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. M.S.Udawat for Mr. Manish Sisodia for the petitioner. None present for the respondents. BY THE COURT Both these writ petitions involve common question of law and facts and are between the same parties and therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the petitioner, are heard and decided together. By these writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the orders dated 27.5.2004, 13.9.2004 and 24.5.2006 have been challenged. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Carefully gone through the material available on record. 2 S.B.C.W. NO. 6480/2006 & another An application under Section 33C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 came to be filed by the respondents workmen before the respondent Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court, Bhilwara (for short 'the Labour Court' hereinafter). The respondent Labour Court by the order impugned dated 13.9.04 allowed the application filed by the respondents workmen directing the petitioner employer to pay the amount to each of the respondents workmen mentioned in the order dated 13.9.04. The respondent State Labour Department informed the petitioner employer that under the provisions of Section 33C (2) the amount payable to the workmen along with simple interest as directed by Labour Court is payable and on being satisfied about the outstanding amount in favour of the workmen, certificate for recovery of the said amount as land revenue can be issued to the concerned District Collector by the State and the petitioner employer was directed to appear for personal hearing before issuance of certificate. The petitioner employer approached to the Labour Court for setting aside the order dated 13.9.2004 directing the petitioner employer to pay the amount with interest to the workmen. By order Annex.6 dated 24.5.06, the respondent Labour Court dismissed the application filed by the petitioner employer under Rule 22A of Rajasthan Industrial Disputes Rules, 1958. 3 S.B.C.W. NO. 6480/2006 & another I have carefully gone through the orders impugned passed by respondent Labour Court. In my view, the findings of fact arrived at by Labour Court is based on sound and proper appreciation of evidence available before it and warrants no interference in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In this view of the matter, I do not find any merit in the writ petitions. Both the writ petitions are therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. Stay petitions also stand dismissed. (H.R. PANWAR), J. Rp