-:1:- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.569 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.569 OF 2008 APPLICATION NO.569 OF 2008 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2004 APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2004 APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2004 Roshan Ali Noor Mohd. Shaikh. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Mr. S.A. Shaikh for the Applicant. Mrs. V.R. Bhosale, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & K.U. K.U. K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. CHANDIWAL,JJ. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 25TH JUNE, 2008. : 25TH JUNE, 2008. : 25TH JUNE, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . This is an application through Jail and the Applicant has prayed that his appeal be listed on the Weekly Board and that Advocate is appointed through legal aid. 2. This is an appeal of 2004. We are hearing appeals of 2002. The appeal of the Appellant will come up in the ordinary course. Hence, relief as prayed for cannot be granted. 3. In so far as legal aid is concerned, we find that the appeal was filed through Advocate S.A. Shaikh who had appeared for the Appellant through legal aid before the Sessions Court. Considering -:2:- that, the question of appointing another Advocate does not arise. Hence, the application is disposed of. 4. A copy of this order be forwarded to the Appellant in Jail. 5. Application is disposed of accordingly. (F.I. (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (K.U. (K.U. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.) CHANDIWAL,J.)