$§ng§@ emh IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. M %07r OF 2009 (/ Sushil Pratap Awasthi,‘ S/o Shri Sahdeo Prasad‘ Awasthi, aged about 58 years, presently posted and working as Agriculture Development Officer, Office of the Assistant Land Conservation Officer, Rajnandgaon (CG). EETITIONER : Versus / RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Agriculture, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. 6eputy Secretary, Department .of Agriculture, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. lgeputy Director . (Agriculture), Rajnandgaon (CG). Ww ’ CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner, above named, most humbly and respectfully beg 33W, WW, W3? WW . wélc$>Wg¥mj wwm (Wm WWW$ Han WN W WW am 31m Wu W‘gfwm $Wa11§$1 SB : HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PFIITINKER DIWAKER 28.8.2009 _ ”Shri §hashank Thakur, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vivek Shanna, RL. for the'State. At the outset, counsel for e petitionar Wants to Withdraw th€ petiticn with liberty to file rep esentation against the impugned transfer ordendated 29.6.2009 assed by the respondent No.2. He however submits that direction may be issued for deciding his representation so made expeditio sly. o objection if the petitioner makes any such representation to the a thority concerned and the same is being decided expeditiously, in‘ac ordance with law. Accordingly, the petition s dismissed as Withdrawn. In the evehtiieiity of filing representatio by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of rec ipt‘of the copy of this order, it is expected from the authorities o decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of three Weeks from the date of its receipt. e ‘ It is made clear that this C on merits of the case and the aut to decide the representation strict Counsel for the State has ourt has not expressed any opinion hority concerned would be at liberty ly in accordance with law. Sdl— Pritinker Diwaker Judge K”xdi in“: A a A