IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Ist Bail Application No.815 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Mukrram S/o Sharif R/o Village Telliwala Padli Gurjar P.S. Kotwali Gangnahar Roorkee, District Haridwar ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: September 1, 2010 __________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.66 of 2010 Under Sections 379 and 411 of IPC P.S. Jhabreda, District Haridwar ________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, GA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that, as per the prosecution story, there is recovery of only six Pendol clips from the possession of the applicant. It is pleaded that the applicant is in jail since 8.7.2010 and has got no previous criminal history. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Mukrram be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 1.9.2010 RG