IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 966 of 2004 (M/B) Neeraj Kumar S/o Sri Satveer Singh, R/o Gurukul Narsan, Haridwar. …………. Petitioners. Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Collector, Haridwar. 2. Prem Vidyalaya Sabha, Gurukul Narsan, Haridwar, Through Administrator/ Collector, Haridwar. 3. Addl. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar. 4. Ravi Kumar S/o Sri Mahaveer Singh, R/o Mohammadpur Jat, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. 5. Sanjay Kumar S/o Sri Surendra Singh, R/o Village Mohammadpur Jat, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. ………. Respondents. ………… Mr. Vijay Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents Nos. 1 and 3. None for respondents Nos. 2, 4 and 5. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Vijay Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for respondents Nos. 1 and 3. None for respondents Nos. 2, 4 and 5. 2. Mr. Vijay Bhatt, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition, now, has become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, the interim orders passed in the case stand vacated automatically. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 15.06.2006 15.06.2006 G