IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL. Writ Petition No. 1042(S/S)07 Ramesh Agarwal S/o late H.S. Agarwal, Supply Inspector, R/o Vikas Nagar, 2/4, Bhagwan Das Quarter, Dehradun. --------Petition. Vs. 1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary, Department of Food & Civil Supplies, Secretariat, Dehradun, 2. Commissioner, Food & Civil Supplies, Uttarakhand, Dehradun. -------Respondents. Sri Anurag Bisaria, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand/respondents. Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri Anurag Bisaria, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for State or Uttarakhand/respondents. The petitioner has preferred the instant writ petition challenging the order dated 22.05.2007 passed by the respondent no. 2 by which the petitioner has been transferred from District Dehradun to District Pauri Garhwal on administrative ground. The main ground of assailing the impugned order is that the petitioner is aged about 57 years and as per the transfer policy, if any employee has left two years for retirement and in case transfer is necessary then option should be invited from the employee concerned and thereafter the employee should be posted one of his choice places. In this regard, the petitioner has already moved a representation on 02.06.2007 (annexure no.4 to the writ petition) before the Commissioner, Food & Civil Supplies, Uttarakhand, Dehradun, which is still pending before him. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer that the respondent no. 2 may be directed to take decision on his representation within the period prescribed by this Court. The prayer is innocuous. Accordingly, I direct Commissioner, Food & Civil Supplies, Uttarakhand, Dehradun to take decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 02.06.2007 (annexure no.4 to the writ petition) within a period of two weeks, from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to produce a certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within a week. With these directions, the writ petition is finally disposed of. No order as to costs. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) August 9, 2007: NCM: