THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:1442 of 2008 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 25.01.2008, in C.M.A.No.31 of 2005 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Hindupur, wherein the said application filed by the respondent herein, was allowed setting aside the order, dated 20.12.2005, in I.A.No.578 of 2004 in O.S.No.109 of 2004 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Madakasira, whereunder the said application filed by the respondent herein-plaintiff for temporary injunction, was dismissed. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. None appeared for the respondent though served with notice. Perused the records. 3. Respondent herein filed the suit for permanent injunction against the petitioners herein. Petitioners- defendants filed written statement contesting the suit. Respondent-plaintiff filed I.A.No.578 of 2004 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC for temporary injunction pending disposal of the suit. Petitioners-defendants filed counter opposing the same. 4. During enquiry before the trial Court, Exs.P1 to P8 were marked on behalf of the plaintiff and Exs.R1 to R17 were marked on behalf of the defendants. 5. On a consideration of the material available on record, the learned Junior Civil Judge by order, dated 20.12.2005, dismissed I.A.No.578 of 2004 and vacated the ad-interim injunction granted on 14.07.2004 on the ground that the plaintiff established prima facie case and balance of convenience in her favour. Aggrieved by the same, plaintiff preferred an appeal in C.M.A.No.31 of 2005. The learned Senior Civil Judge by the impugned order, dated 25.01.2008, allowed the appeal and set aside the order of the trial Court and consequently granted temporary injunction restraining the defendants-petitioners herein from interfering with the plaintiff’s possession and enjoyment of the schedule property of Ac.4.16 cents in Sy.No.63/3 of R.Anantapuram village. Assailing the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed by the defendants. 6. While admitting the Civil Revision Petition, this Court by order, dated 20.06.2008, directed that status quo obtaining as on that day shall be maintained until further orders. 7. As the suit itself is one for injunction, the same aspects, which are to be considered in the present proceedings, do arise for consideration in greater detail during the course of the trial. The suit being of the year, 2004, it is considered desirable to direct the trial Court to dispose of the suit itself at an early date, instead of going into the merits of the matter in the present proceedings at this length of time, about seven years after filing of the suit. 8. In the circumstances, the learned Junior Civil Judge, Madakasira is directed to dispose of the suit itself within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and till such time, the interim direction granted by this Court on 20.06.2008, directing the parties to maintain status quo obtaining as on that day shall remain in force. 9. Civil Revision Petition is disposed of accordingly. _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY,J 19th August, 2011. Tsy