IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.22590 of 2010 RAVEN DAS son of Raghu Das Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 26.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased but there is no direct material against him and since it is not a case under section 304-B Indian Penal Code there would no question of raising presumption against the in-laws of the deceased. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, II, Supaul, in connection with Pipra P.S. case no.88 of 2008 (S. T. No.56 of 2010), subject to the conditions (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the mother of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, and (ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)