-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.7856 of 2007 1. Smt.Gajarabai Shankar Kamble and others ..Petitioners vs. 1. Smt.Kumudini Shivling Pardeshi and others ..Respondents Shri Mohan N.Dhamal for petitioners. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. 29th January, 2008 29th January, 2008 29th January, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The impugned order is interlocutory. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that the lower Appellate Court has not allowed the issue of limitation to be raised or the plea regarding fraud perpetrated by the opponent, then, while impugning the final order in case the same is adverse to him, the petitioner can raise appropriate pleas. Keeping such pleas open the petition is dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)