IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.332 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Swan Mills Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i/b.Ms.Suchitra Kamble for appellant. None for respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.334 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Schmetz India Ltd. ..Respondent Ms.Devki Iyer for appellant. None for respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.333 OF 2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.335 OF 2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.336 OF 2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.337 OF 2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.338 OF 2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.339 OF 2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.340 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Savani Financial Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i/b. Ms.Suchitra Kamble for appellant. None for respondent. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE :- 9TH JULY, 2009 P.C. 1. These appeals are barred by limitation. Admittedly, no notices of motion are taken out. There is no prayer for condonation of delay. No sufficient cause is shown Apart from this, following the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Chaudharana Steels (P) Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Central Excise reported in 2009 (238) ELT 705 (S.C.), we have held in the case of CIT V/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. (Notice of Motion No.787 of 2009 in I.T.A. (L) No.3592 2008) decided on 8/7/2009) that this Court has no power to condone the delay in filing an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. In this view of the matter, all the appeals are dismissed being barred by limitation with no order as to costs (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)