IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 14864 of 2009 Between: Mohan singh Bhalla S/o.S.Bhalla R/o.H.No.12-13-271, Tarnaka, Secunderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate Gachobowli, Hyderabad 2 The Station House officer, Uppal P.S., R.R.District 3 C.S.Sethi S/o.Jaswanth Singh R/o.H.No.2-1-40/24/C, Lakshmi Arcade,Surya Nagar colony, Uppal, R.R.District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents in not taking any action on the complaint dated 25.4.2009 submitted by the petitioner against the 3rd respondent herein, as being illegal, and arbitrary, a nd consequently direct the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein to forthwith act upon the complaint dated 25.4.2009 and to take action against the 3rd respondent in accordance with law and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon`ble court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.VEERJALAPRAVEEN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 14864 of 2009 ORDER: 1 The petitioner, who is a retired government servant, wanted to purchase a residential plot from out of his retiral benefits and accordingly he purchased two flats by paying a total sale consideration of Rs.12,60,000/- to the third respondent and entered into an agreement of sale with him. Though the third respondent promised to execute the sale deed he never executed any registered sale deed nor did he handover possession of the said plots to the petitioner. 2. While being so, on 24.04.2009 when the petitioner visited the said plots, he surprisingly found some third parties in the said plots. Then the petitioner questioned the third respondent about the same for which the third respondent threatened the petitioner with dire consequences. In the light of the same, the petitioner approached the second respondent and gave a report against the third respondent on 25.4.2009. But however, as no action has been initiated, the petitioner approached this court and filed the present Writ Petition. 3 On instructions the Government Pleader for Home submitted that after receiving the complaint from the petitioner, the police i.e. second respondent registered a case against the third respondent in Cr.No.751 of 2009 for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 506 of IPC and the matter is under investigation. 4 Having regard to the submissions made by the learned Government Pleader for Home that a crime has already been registered under sections 420 and 506 of IPC, no orders need be passed in this Writ Petition. 5 Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to complete the investigation and enquiry into Cr.No.751 of 2009 as expeditiously as possible within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. --------------------------- SRI T.G.K, J. 04.08.2009 Kvsn