1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN Crl.R.C (MD).No.7 of 2011 and M.P(MD).No.1 of 2011 Jagadeesun Nagendran Jeyaprakash ... Petitioner vs. Chitralekha ... Respondent Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C, against the order, dated 07.12.2010 passed in the unnumbered Cr.M.P....... of 2010 in M.C.No.19 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thanjavuar. For petitioner : Mr.K.K.Ramakrishnan For respondent : Mr.A.Arun Prasad ORDER Heard both the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent. 2. Challenging the order, dated 07.12.2010 passed in unnumbered Crl.M.P relating to the year 2010 in M.C.No.19 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thanjavur, this Criminal Revision has been preferred. 3. It is seen that the petitioner herein is the husband of the respondent. The petition in M.C.No.19 of 2010 was filed by the respondent herein and her minor daughter, before the Court below, seeking maintenance. 4. When the matter was pending, it is seen that the revision petitioner herein filed the Interlocutory Application, wherein it has been stated as follows : "Further, for the hearing date was short and booking of Air Tickets is expected 20 to 25 days before the actual date of journey, by any stretch of imagination attending the Honourable Court on 12.11.2010 or on each hearing or at least from 10.11.2010 till February 2011 would be very much difficult and may result in the termination of my contractual job in pursuance of the privity of contract, I entered with my company. Therefore, I humbly request this Honourable Court to dispense with my personal attendance on 12.11.2010 and till the case is posted for effective hearing of enquiry after February 2011 and permit my advocate Thiru.Punniamoorthi to represent me and conduct my case. " https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. The revision petitioner has specifically asked the Court below to dispense with his personal appearance from 10.11.2010 till February 2011. As contended by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, the period is over and therefore, nothing survives in the criminal revision to be adjudicated and accordingly, the revision itself became infructuous. 6. In the result, this Criminal Revision is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar (Writs) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To The Judicial Magistrate No.II,Thanjavuar. tsvn Crl.R.C.(MD).No.7 of 2011 11.10.2011 TR :02.11.2011: 2p/2c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/