IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43490 of 2010 1. PAPPU PRASAD 2. SURAJ KUMAR -------------------------------- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Death is beyond the period of seven years, so it is a case of section 302 IPC but reason for killing is non-fulfilment of demand of dowry which was being demanded for business. Husband was running business in Delhi is specified in the F.I.R. itself. Remote relations have also been made accused in the case. Petitioners are younger brother-in-laws. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda in Harnaut (Gokhulpur) P.S. Case No. 198/10, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)