-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9588 OF 2010 Smt. Savita Jalinder Shete ..... Petitioner. V/s Shri Chandrashekhar S. Mohapathaki and Ors. ..... Respondents. ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.9589 OF 2010 Shri Mukund Sakharam Meher .... Petitioner. V/s Shri Chandrashekhar S. Mohapathaki and Ors .... Respondents. ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.9593 OF 2010 Shri Jalinder Baburao Shete .... Petitioner. V/s Shri Chandrashekhar S. Mohapathaki & Ors. ..... Respondents. Mr. U.B. Nighot for the Petitioner in all the above Writ Petitions. Mr. R. M. Patne, AGP for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in all the above Writ Petitions. Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : March 30, 2011. P. C. : 1. The petitions pertain to the recording of mutation entry. It is settled position of law that the mutation entries do not create or extinguish rights of any party and the same are recorded for the fiscal purposes only. A reference can be made to the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Balwant Singh & Another v/s. srp -: 2 :- Daulat Singh, reported in 1997 (7) SCC 137. 2. Remedy of the parties is to approach the Civil Court to get adjudicated their rights. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to entertain these petitions and interfere with the impugned order in writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Writ Petitions are therefore dismissed. (RANJIT MORE, J.)