/" r^ <—*--\S^3~^/^- T'W^?'1 osnEfi'i K ss£&srfc: 'Si^isl S* .tlEra^'s'i ^^^^K-.' ^ ^^ •»••••••s; IN THE HON'BLE HIGH^OURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.j'. (Sl No. $1 ^9 /2009 PETITIONER ^4^ t"...:n-^v1^- ^^ y RESPONDENTS Lal Mani Tiwari, aged 53 years, S/o. Late Shri S.D. Tiwari, Head Master Primary School, Chandawi Para, Ward NQ. 5, Nagar, Panchayat, Wadraf Nagar, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, School Education Departnient Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Secretary, Department of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Development, State of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THB NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, QUO-WARRANTO. ORDER/DIRECTION IN THE LIKE NATURE _PAE'I1C1BL ^ ^2- ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR PETiTiONER WRiT PETITiON (Sl N0. 5149 OF 2009 La! Mani Tiwari RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Another (Writ petifion under Articie 226 of the Constitution c.f india) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Rahui Birthare, counsei for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. Adv. General with Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER(QRAy (Passed on this 10m day of September, 2009$ 1. Heard leamed counsei for the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing for tha petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner doss not want to contest this petition on merits at this staae; however, he seeks libertv to make a representation to the respondent authorities, within a period of one week, to consider his case on humanitarian grounds. 3. Shri Thakur, leamed Dy. Adv. Genera! appearing with Shri Bhaduri, learned Panel Lawyer for the State submits that m the event. the oetitioner makes a reDresentation, the same will be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 4. In view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudicafion. 5. Accordingiy, the writ petition is disposed of. However, it is made clear that there shail not be any coercive steps against the petitionertii! disposai ofthe representation. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge