Criminal Revision No. 898 of 1996 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. Criminal Revision No.898 of 1996 Date of Decision: 20.2.2008. Nourang …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dinesh Arora, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the State. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, states that as per the information received form parokar, petitioner has expired, therefore, the present revision petition shall abate. However, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhiwani is directed to conduct a preliminary enquiry regarding the factum of death of the petitioner. In case the petitioner is said to have expired, then no reference is required to be made to this Court and if the information regarding his death is not correct, then the same be furnished to this Court . Criminal Revision No. 898 of 1996 2 With these observations, the present revision petition is disposed of having abated. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge February 20, 2008 “DK”