IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER 03.4.2008. S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.662/2008. M/s. Bohra Trading Company & Ors.Vs. Praveen R. Patel HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH ShrI Dinesh Yadav, for the appellants. Shri Govind Chaudhary, for the respondent. An application No.7843 dated 14.3.2008 has been filed by the respondent stating therein that it has wrongly been submitted on the side of the appellant that the Rs.21 lakhs has been furnished in the earlier suit between the same parties. It is submitted that the said security has not been furnished in any suit filed by the respondent but by different parties against the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant does not dispute the above facts which was recorded in the order dated 27.2.2008. Learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that even after passing of the interim order by this court on 27.2.2008 the appellant has executed the sale deed of their property on 1.3.2008 in favour of one Dharamveer Rai. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that with a view to protect the interest of the plaintiff the appellant is willing to deposit the amount of Rs.6 lakhs with the learned trial court as is being claimed in the suit by the plaintiff respondent. In view of the above, it is hereby directed that in case the appellant deposits an amount of Rs.6 lakhs ( rupees Six lakhs) with the learned trial court to cover the claim of the respondent, within 8 weeks from today, the impugned order passed by the learned trial court dated 31.1.2008 shall stand vacated. Till then however, the appellant is restrained not to alinate or encumber the property belonging to him in any manner. The appellant is permitted to enter into any agreement for sale with a view to satisfy the claim of the plaintiff and for depositing the amount of Rs.6 lakhs as suggested by the learned counsel for the appellant. The appellant is permitted to approach the learned trial court for permission to enter into the sale of such property to deposit the amount of Rs.6 lakhs. Upon such an application being filed and the trial court being satisfied of the case made in the said application the learned trial court may grant such permission on any condition as it may think fit. Subject to the above this appeal, the stay application and the application No.7843filed by the respondent are disposed of. The interim order dated 27.2.2008 stands vacated. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS