_._L_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Contempt Peti^Ion iC} No. 3 o 2- /2010 ../ PEnTIONEK*^ \vp\^'' ,^s ^ ....-•^^ '^•'^ ^ w^ <TOle Benct A' 'p Vishweshwar Pandey, S/o. Thakur Prasad Pandey, Aged about 39 years, R/o Rewalpur, Post- Dhandhapar, P.S. & Tahsil Rajpur, District Surgyja (C.G.) ^*"^^: VERSUS <&A'^ RESPONDENT CONTEMNOR Mr. Sargias Minj, Aged about 54 years, Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CQNSTITUTION READ WITH SECTION 10 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT XI-HC—78 T oo ^W^IT WRI^ -s^ ^m^n, "g?^Tr^, f«idiy^< .^..&.^.^^^ 3Tr^T^Tl^W "(T^TT W^T ^^i<^ \sw^ Tumane ar^r "T^F (^rfTT^) T~ ^RIW: ^tf^ ^I^T _SR " Hnn'hle Shri ManiiKlraJflghan. 05-08-2011 Shri Atanu Ghosh, counsel for ft Shri Sushil Dubey, counsel for Heard. Learned counsel for the parti| pendency of the petition, representatf decided by the respondent in compliar| he petitioner. :he respondent. ?s jointly submitted that during the on of the petitioner has been finally ce of the order dated 15-09-2009. In the reply submitted by the r^spondent, it has been stated that he was no intention to flout the order of| the Court, however, due to the fact that the respondent had taken ove 12-02-2010 and some delay was caujsed on account of co-ordination and correspondences with the other fun{ respondent submits that for the d^ respondent prays for unconditional apc Taking into consideration the s|>spbmission made by learned counsel for the parties and that the order of ttjie Court has already been complied with and also considering the reply SL|bmitted by the respondent, 1 am not inclined to proceed further in the matte| Accordingly, the petition is petitioner would be at liberty to take available to him under the law to assai passed by the respondent in complianc WqfeT^ 'RFJc?f ^ fe^- TfW$R ^r 3tftp(:f3TT^T h4yvastava.. the charge of the office only on tionaries. Learned counsel for the lay, which has been caused, the logy. ^. Rule is therefore discharged. fnally disposed off. However, the lecourse to such remedy as may be the legality and validity of the order te of the order of the Court. Sd/- MamndraMoba..Sbrivastava Judge