(1) CA-13738.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13738 OF 2011 IN REVIEW APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 4729 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8776 OF 2010 Muktai D/o Gulab Deoraj APPLICANT/ PETITIONER VERSUS The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee and ors. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. S.B. Talekar, Advocate h/f. Mr. V.B. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant/Petitioner in WP. Mr. R.P. Phatke, Advocate for the Respondent no.1 Mr. P.S. Patil, Advocate for respondent no.2 ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 23RD NOVEMBER, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The grounds which are raised in the present Civil Application may be good grounds for assailing the order passed by us. However, while passing the said order, we have considered all the relevant factors and passed our judgment based on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of "Raju Ramsingh Vasave Vs. Mahesh Deorao Bhivapurkar and ors. (2) CA-13738.2011 reported in 2009(1) Mh.L.J. 1." We have in unequivocal terms held that while granting validity certificate in favour of the petitioner's father, the Committee had ignored the vital documentary evidence showing the caste of the petitioner's father and grandfather as "Suryawanshi Koli" and "Koli". 3. Merely because the petitioner feels that the view taken by this Court is erroneous, cannot be a ground for invoking the review jurisdiction. This may be a ground, which may be available to a party, to challenge the order before the Apex Court. 4. We see no error apparent on the face of record to warrant invoking the review jurisdiction. 5. Civil Application stands rejected. Sd/- Sd/- [M. T. JOSHI, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.] arp/