m^iI^Tl^FIW W3?^i'a?qw ^IHfIT fli*<l<») ~s^ -^wwii, ®t{l+i<is,f»i<niyy ..^...s'y.^..ii... SII^I'TSRT C^fg^ti) TOITW ^lftff 3TI^?I PBTITIONER Pan4atma Stngh aged about 45 years, S/o Ramjataa Siagh, Rcsidcnt of Prunaiy North Jhagrakhand, District Korea Shri Sclic (CG) Sclic^ol, RESPONDENTS 1, Stat Dep D.KI The, Kor< of Ciihatdsgarh, through -Secretaiy, jartaient of School Education, MaiLtralaya, |S. Bhawaa, Raipur (CG) 4. S.B. HON'BLE SHRI DHIRflNDRA MISHRA. J. 30.09.2008 Shri R.K. Jaiswal, coijnsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy qnqferih inwff •if'fs'ATfSrere ^i'siRn aii^i Versus IDistrict Education Officer, Korea, Disfa'ict- jsa, C.G. Prm|iary School North Jhagarakhand, Thr<|>ugh Headinaster, Siaghi CoUieiy Edujcation Society, Jhagarakhand, Uistt,- Ko4a (CG) Thej Director, Directorate, Public Institution, Pen^ion Bada, Raipur (CG) Writ Petition U/A 2^6/227 ofthe Coastltutioa oflndia GA for the State. Heard. Wifh the consent oftye parties, the matter is heard finaUy. By this petition., the| the beD.efits of 5th Pay Coi petitioner, who is workmg as Assistaat Teacher in Primaiy Schoolj, Jhayakhasd, District-Korea is Glaiming ision at par with their counterparts in th? Govenuneut Schools. 1]tie 5th Pay Coinmission was to be graated (•£ il- ^'lTi^'nr^r; Ll8¥^£-^'-^-^.' .- ^ a°am^B^it!5]is^i?ar^^^^^ w'B'tiewa'Siss^-BSg'] ^fl»^S%'®Sfgs!gs®ss.^-is-,^;;»tj;,.•./ HG—78 K'.'I ~'fn frfe iiff^I *<1'W r-) WHW VhW^h ^^ •<fl<ilW<i, ®tll<-l'l<o,fqc1l'(H^< _t^±S^M^..^Ci sn^i •q?R7 (ijqfg^r) ^IIW^ltetCT^T with effect from 1.1.1996 in accordauce with the Madhva Pradesh Revision pf Pay Rules, 1998. This Court by the jud^inent aad order dated 6.2.2007 ia the case ofSmt. A LaU Vs. State of| (W.P. No.4108 of 20051 hel4 aided schools are entitled fbi Pay Commission. After th^ ffled this petition on 25.9.2q Leamed counsel app^ jr the benefit of recomiuendations ofthe 5th ^iT<4iCT4i't +if^<nf ^f fsl^ <r^'(^,i< ^atfinsn^r Ihhattis^irli aud other connected matters that fhe teachers workmg iu Govemiaent decision of this Court, the petitiouer has 08 clamung the same relief. •aring for the petitioner subinits that the petitioner has niade repres^ntation on 2.8.2008 (Aanexure P-2) to the respoudents authorities, whtch was not cousidered at all. In view of the fact flhat fhe reoresentation of the netitioner is pendiag consideration befi^re authorily concemed, fhe respondeats authorities are accordingy dated 2.8.2008 (AnuexuTel accordance wifti law, on it^ aad oider dated 6.2.2007 p^ directed to consider his representation P-2) pendiag before respondent No.l iu own inerits, iu ttie light of the judginent ssed by this Court in the inatter ofSmt. A LaU (Supra). The petition is accordingly disposed of. .V.- l^'wa ^cco^