-S;Bt^S'v-. /YlftCc^) ^° <^ HIGH COURT OFCHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISIONBENCH Coram HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, G.J. & HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMARSINHA, J. MA.rCl (PRt No.1824of 2007 Appellants RESPQNDENTS 1. Chinte Ram Sonwani, S/o Late Firta Sonwani, Aged about 45 years 2. Smt. Sukha Bai, W/o Chinta Ram Sonwani, Agedabout 43 years Both are resident of Vitlage Sarona, Thana Amanaka, Tahsii & District Raipur (C.G.) Versus 1. Trigun Rai, S/o Mageqwar Rai, Aged about 38 yeare, R/o Xremtk Raja Jain Tahsil & Distt. Raipur 2. Xremik Raja Jain S/o Shri P.C. Jain R/o Moti Nagar, Choubey Colony, Distt. & Tahsil Rafpur 3. The New India tnsurance Company Lfmited, Through: DMsional Manager, Dh/islonal Offlce, Madina Building, Jail Road, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur 4. Santosh Kumar Rawat, S/o Bundram Rawat, R/o Ashok MarketGole Bazar, Raipur (C.G.) Memo of Aopeal Undec.JSectton 173 of Motor Vehictes Act. 1988 Present: Shri YC Sharma, counsel for the appellants. ORDER (26th June, 2008) AMITA AWASTHI Digitally signed by AMITA AWASTHI Date: 2025.02.04 10:22:55 +0530 padma The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: Shri YC Sharma, leamed counsel for the appellants, in view of the fact that the appeal inadvertently came to be filed on behalf of theclaimants for enhancement, instead of an appeat on behalf of owner of the vehtole against the award, seeks permission to withdraw theappeal with the liberty of fiting another appeal on behalf of the owner against the award. 2) Permission granted. 3) With the above llberty, the appeal is disreissed as withdrawn. 4) Certified copy of the impugned award and Vatalatnama be retumed to leamedcounselfor the appedartfs. r Sd/- CBiefJustice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ./,-- '*»-