IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 118 of 2003. Date of Decision: 18th December, 2008. Dera Jawala Dass ...Petitioner through None Versus Gram Panchayat, Village Manna .Respondent through Mr. Ashok Singla, Advocate with Major Balbir Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) This Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 13.11.2002 passed by the learned District Judge, Sangrur whereby the order dated 22.7.2002 passed by learned Civil Judge [Senior Division], Dhuri has been set aside and the petitioner and its co- defendants have been restrained from dispossessing the Gram Panchayat – plaintiff and from raising any construction illegally or forcibly over the suit property. The aforementioned orders were passed while deciding an ad-interim injunction application in a declaratory suit. While admitting the revision petition, this Court vide order dated 11.8.2003 directed the parties to maintain status-quo with regard to possession. The aforementioned interim order is operating from last more than five years and in a way, both the parties have reconciled with the same. In this view of the matter and without going into the merits of the rival claims, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this revision petition with a direction that in case the civil suit is still pending, the interim order dated 11.8.2003 shall continue to operate till the decision of the suit, however, without prejudice to the rival contentions of the parties which shall be gone into by the trial Court on merits. In case the suit has already been decided, this revision shall be deemed to have been disposed of as having become infructuous. December 18, 2008. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE