IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.3351 of 2005 Samapti Sen Gupta wife of Shri A. N. Kar Gupta, residing of H.I.G. House No.126, Laheriasarai, District Darbhanga… …..Petitioner Versus 1. Bihar State Housing Board, Patna through its Managing Director, 2. The Revenue Officer, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna, 3. Manager Estate, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna, 4. Executive Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga.. …Respondents …………………… For the Petitioner : Mr. Mrigank Molly, Advocate For the Respondents & Board : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocates ------------------------------- 3 04.08.2011 Petitioner is aggrieved by the demand made by the respondent-Bihar State Housing Board for additional amount of Rs.7,00,631/-. The case of the petitioner is that he had opted for allotment of flat/house under the scheme of High Income Group (HIG) in Laheriasarai, Darbhanga and the same has been allotted to him. According to the petitioner, he had already deposited all the amount as per demand within time. Thus, additional demand by the Board is 2 illegal. Supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4 and stand now has been taken that calculation of the principal amount and interest has been done by Revenue Section of the respondent-Board in respect of the High Income Group (HIG) flat/house in question bearing No. H/126 and information has also been given to the allottee. Thereafter, it has been categorically stated by the respondents that as per the calculation, no outstanding dues are there against the petitioner and steps have been taken for final transfer of the flat/house in question. In above view of the matter, it appears that no grievance of the petitioner remains to be redressed and this writ application has lost its efficacy. Accordingly, the same stands disposed of. Sanjay-II ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)