SAS^S F" E;??^°.ii;w sw^?.^ f'y.:i'"^1 [N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER: ^°^ ":s'^" ....-•""c^-< °-'•"" ^;^?^'"' A'c\-V; C1 o^- \\ '?^>; ^'f' AP -4(f,s~7~ Satyanarayan Paikra, S/o Sadaram Paikra, Aged about 35 years, Occupation: Service, Presently posted as Assistant VeterinarYOfficer^^:: yeterinarYHosgital^_,... Lakhanpur, District: Surguja, R/o Laldianpur; District: Surguja, Chhattisgarh. - Versus - ^ RESPONDENTS: ^r"' -.•rftf*-":~. ^ \:.^'" tly ^^ <.o '^. 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department ofVeterinary, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. /l. Collector, Surguja, Chhattisgarh. < 3. District Veterinaiy Officer, Lakhanpur, District: Surguja, Chhattisgarh- ,4. Bhuneshwar Das, Assistant Veterinary Officer, Chalgali, Pratappur, District: Surguja, Chhattisgarh. WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE :CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITAVRITS, DIRECTtONS ETC, IN THE NATUR£_OF_^LmDAMUS, CERTIORAM AND/OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE 'he petitioiier, above named, most respectftilly begs to submit as under: "TS5r:^^'M^^^^@ VMs XI-HC-78 qTKcTT ai*rra» 3:5T rtliqicli), ®Tfl.M'|6,RdWy ^.^.^,.^is^2o^ 3<i^i Ma«n(yl^q<^ff) 3n^T^iTR-fi»b awan^Tsbtiieb SRITW ^tT 3I1^T i*i''(ffi41-< iii<'iTffte^t<Ri«[< ^STf^TSTI^T ^; -,•;-}.. 11.8.2006:- Shri V.C. Ottalwar, counsel fi|>r the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy G<|>vt. Advocate for the State/respondents No.1 to 3, on advance copy. Heard. By this peh'tion, the petitio ler has challenged his transfer order Annexure-P/6 dated 7-7-2006 pass^d bythe Collector, Surguja. The main grievance of the setitioner is that on 5-5-2006 when he was at his residence, some persjans came claiming themselves to be ..A- persons of M.L.A. and asked him tc treatmentfi:theiranimal. When h( accompany them to Udaipur for gSw^ replied that the said area does not fall within his jurisdiction, therefore, h4 cannot go there to treat theiranimal, on which they threatened him. h<e made a complaint to his immediate officer i.e. District Veterinary OfRc' the petitioner has been transferred sr as well as the Collector, ttiereafter, vide impugned order. So far nothing has been communicated to the petitjoner in respect of his complaint. In the cireumstances, learn^d counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner may be allowed 1 No.2 Collector and in turn, he be leamed counsei for respondents No Having heard learned couns on the merit of the case, the pel b make a representationlo respondent directed to decide the same, to which .1 to 3 has no objection. |el for the parties, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the ca^e and without expressing any opinion itioner is allowed to make a detailed representetion along with a copy o1| this petition to respondent No.2 within a period of 10 days from today an<( in tum, respondent No.2 shalt decide Ihe rapresentation within a period 1pf 60 days from the date of receipt of the representation, after conside|ring the grievances raised by the P.T.O. '%--.: i* <2X XI-HC-78 3ST^ffqT?PI', ®Tnwi6,RlMiyy *TWcn gfflich W^ 200 311^1 4ath (l?t3g^!T) 3TI^TqirR-fi«b (raT3n^T»tiiqi Barve fc. ?RITW ^ifer •MI^T •^o^' petitioner in the representation, in| directed to enquire into the compls|i impugned order is outcome of the ^ 2006. If so, then the Coilector to those points and pass appropriate In the meantime, the effect respect of the petitioner shatl rema) petitioner is decided. With the direction aforesaid, Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.3p Parties are sntitled for certifieti accordance w'rth law. He is further int and to ascertain as to whether the (hreat given by those persons on 5-5- tdecide the representetion considering otder. ahd the petition stands disposed of. 3P29/2006 also stands disposed of. copyofthisorder. qOTfepftr WRrr'ir IWI''^RZTC ^ISTf^TSn^T operation of the impugned order in n stayed, titl the representation of the Sd/ v ^ P.T.O. /