IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5374 of 2010 1. Manoj Kumar S/O Late Dharamdeo Prasad @ Dharamdeo Mahto R/O Vill.- Kalyanpur, P.O.- Mohabba, P.S.- Sahebpur Kamal, Distt.- Begusarai. Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Collector, Begusarai 3. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Begusarai 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer,Baliya,Distt. Begusarai 5. The BlockDevelopment Officer, Dandari Under Baliya Sub Division, Distt. Beguasarai 6. The Circle Officer, Dandari Block, Dandari Under Belia Sub-Division, Distt. Begusarai 7. Bimal Kumar Singh S/O Not Known R/O Vill. Raksha, P.O. Raksha, P.S. Karja, Distt. Muzaffarpur. Respondents. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Sinha Advocate For the State : Mr. Rewai Kant Raman, AC to G.P.13. 2. 15.7.2011. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. The petitioner alleges encroachment by the respondent authorities over his raiyati land bearing Khata no.39, Khesra No.1260, thana no.630, Tauzi No.653 having an area of 3 katha 5 dhoor, 5 dhoorki situated at Mauza Mohabba, P.S.Sahebpur Kamal, in the district of Begusarai. It is contended that in case of construction of a State Highway under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna, a scheme of the Central Government, the respondent authorities in the process of execution of the Scheme including the contractor appointed in this regard, are 2 encroaching over the part of his land as described hereinabove. It is also contended that even while a public land is available for construction of the road in question, yet the respondent authorities by diverting the original pathway, have encroached over this land which is violative of the rights guaranteed under the Constitution. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a batch of case involving similar issues came for consideration before this court in C.W.J.C.No.2490 of 2010 and this Court upon consideration of the rival stand, has disposed of the writ petition with certain direction under which the obligations have been cast upon both the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner and the State are in agreement that as the issue raised in the present writ petition is identical to the subject matter of C.W.J.C.No.2490 of 2010, hence, the present writ petition can also be disposed of in similar terms. With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of in the light of the order dated 2.5.2011 passed in C.W.J.C.No.2490 of 2010 and analogous cases, in 3 terms of the directions contained therein and the obligations cast upon the respective parties thereunder. With the observation aforesaid this writ petition is disposed of. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)