1 CR.APL NO.1260/2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 7 CRI. APPLN/1260/2011 BALIRAM RAMCHANDRA RAIFALE & others VS THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. N.V.Gaware, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. N.B.Patil, APP for State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:1/4/2011 1. The accused / applicants, victims of a clash with rival group, giving rise to Crime Nos.38/2011 and 39/2011, seek bail in terms of Section 438 of Cr.P.C. in Crime No. 38/2011. 2. Learned Counsel submits that the accused/applicant no.1 Baliram is a Headmaster, gainfully employed and was elsewhere while applicant no.2 Madhav is a teacher and was not at the spot when the alleged incident has taken place. 3. The FIR of Bhagwat Maruti Ghuge illustrated that it was not accused/applicants alone but all his 2 CR.APL NO.1260/2011 companions have jointly assaulted with stone/boulder/fists. Nothing is to be recovered from the accused/applicants. 4. The persons from the group of applicants were arrested on 9.3.2011, however, the Police did not seek their custody as nothing was to be recovered. Considering these aspects and applicant nos.1 and 2 primarily were not at the place of event, the request to release the applicants/accused, in the event of arrest, is favourably considered. 5. The interim protection dt.23rd March, 2011, is made absolute. The accused/applicants shall attend the investigator on every Sunday between 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. upto 30th June, 2011. They shall not influence the witnesses. Criminal Application allowed in above terms. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/1260-11crapl