^>}'L...r-- ^ ^R.^..-^-S^S?1-^ L^' ^^0-...- s,^ BETO IN THE HIGH COURT OP JCFDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION. No. (S) M^2-1 /2006 (S.B.) PETITIONER PAmSHRASIOS 'HRKEY S/o Late Shri Siril Tirkey Aged About 51 Yrs. Occupation, Village Assistant R/0 Village and Post Mahadeo .3 dhand Tahsil, Bagicha District Jashpur (C.G.) VERSES ^l. State OfCMiattls^rh. Through, Secretary Pancha3?at and Social Welfare. D.K. S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur. ^ 2. Collector, Jashpur .f\ DistrictJashpur(C.G.) ; ^•C\^w .« ^ 3. Deputy Dlrector, ^^^^ ,^'v Panchayat and Social Welfare ^ /3^s^^^> District Jashpur (C.G.) ^,- "" <^^p>' 4- Sub Dhristonal Ofllcer (R) <^ "' Tahsil Bagicha, District Jashpur (C.G.) --^5. CItlefEKecutive OfHcN- Janpad Panchayat Bagicha TahsU, Bagicha, Distt. ^\V^^^ Jashpur. (C.G.]l ii^a^ WRTT inromi ARTICI.E 226/22T OF THE CONSTITUTION OF TODIA iTOR ISSUAWCB OF A SOTTABLE WRIT. ORDERS OR DIRECTION PAGENo^ XI-HC-78 <-Tr*f^Trsti*Ti<h 3^ •<<Nld^, »Tntl'ls,(slcliuy ^- .^f. .^.<]-?.ikk. l^, ^ 200 3:n^?THa<*) (yi(^o<<er) sn^rqirR-fi* (WT ad^T sRlIW -< ?T(ITW ofN sn^r 1.9.2006 Mr. Prakash Tiwari, Advoeat4 Miss. Deepali Psndey, P.L. for^ Heard. Heard on admission. By this writ petition, the pe^ order-dated 23.3.2006 (Annexure F|. one grade i'ncrement without cum^l petitioner. The moin grievsnce 6f the imposed without holdin9 re9u!ar' ei| bad in iaiv. Ru!e 16 of the ChhattiS9ar^ Appeal) Ruies, 1966 (for short 'Rule|s, rainor penalty. ftuie 16 (1) envisa9es servcnt in wr'iting of the propossj intputations of misconduct or rais!^ takan, and giving him a reasonable o| as he may wish to make Q9cinst the the Sovernment sarvant under claijse held under clause (b) into consid4ra'i'ion imputation of misconduct or misbeh^ In the present case, the or| wos qiven in writinq of the propo4 "ecorded finding on each imputation «bi<iif<'i'if1-i tfiwdT fr' ts^S <Ri*<;i< ^sf^irsn^r for the petitionsr. the State on advance copy. •itioner has chalienged the validity of the -1) wher-eby the penolty ofwithhoiding of llative effeet has been imposed on the petitioner is that the pansity has been iquiry, therefore, the impu9ned order is Civil Services (Classification, Control & ;, 1966') provides procedure for imposing that "(a) after informing ths ©overnrnent to take oction cgainst him and of the lehayiour on which it is propossd to be aportunity of making such reprssentation sroposal; (b) toking the repr'essntation of (a) cnd the record of enquiry, if any, i; (c) recording a finding on sach [ivior. ^er impugned shows that the petitioner ta! to taks action against him and olso |of misconduct or misbehavior. Annexurs P.T.O. '•••9 XI-HC-78 TS? •<<l<llcl<l, (jixdy'is, Islciwy HTI^I ShHTch ^[ 200 31^1 ysith (t^3^:T) an^rr qir R^i* TOT3:n^Tstl1 ^ <K <^~ TOITW afN sn^ff -ZJ- the P-3 is the notice ss well as commul misbehavior of the petitioner anip submitted his reply Annexure P-4| ciosing the office,he ieft the offic( order further revea^s that even hesrin9 ond after considerin9 th^ ifflpugnsd has been psssed whereby grade increment without cumulative Therefore, there is sufficieht 1966 cnd I do not find ony iilegalit^ the petition is liabls to be dismissed Consequentiy, M.(W.)P. No.; ^l^[d^^ ^IH^ff tffe^ if^fW.K ^isil^iTsn^r lication of imsutation of misconduct or in response to thst ths petitioner in which he has admitted that after at 12.30 p.m. Perusa! of the impugned petitioner was given opportunity of repiy of the petitionsr, the order the minor penaity of withhoiding of one rffect has been imposed. complianee of Rule 16 of the Rulss, \ or" irreguiar'ity in the order impugned, !and it is hersby dismissed. slso stands dismiss^" :~ c, ^i. ^.C3^ado° ]udge P.T.O.