F- € ?^ ^ I. ra THE HIOH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILA8PUR (C.OI. WRIT PETmON N0. f^J 8 OF 2004 / PETITIONER: ..••*^V^BiindarLal, S/o Shri Itwari, ^ ^^^e\.) ^' Aged atout 51 years, ^%^M^T7^ /R7°^iBage: Balod Gahan, .'•''''^•'^^•\'' / Tehsil; Gurur, Efett. Dm%( ^ ••' <^fv •^^ Dm%(C.G.)> ^:v^^...) '^•""'" ^^ RESPONDENTS: ~ Versus - y 1. 2. 3. State ofChhattisgarh, Throxighu The Secretaiy, PubUc Worfcs Departxoent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipiir, CKhattisgarh. Execative Er^meer, National HSghway Divteioii No.l, Public Worfcs Department» Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Sub Divteional Officer» Natioiial Hi^hsyay Sub Division» PubUc Works Departmenti, Raipur (C.O.). .^'" WRIT PETITI02T UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THB coirsTiTUTioir or IVDIA ^v ^. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WntPetitiQnNo,548of2004 Petitioner Sundar Lal Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & others (Writ Petition under Ardcle 226f'227 offhe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) None for fhe petitioner. Ms Siaita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for fhe respondents. O RD B R (orall ( Passed on this 15th day ofSeptember, 2009) 1, The niatter is caUed for hearing twice. On both fhie occasions none appears nor aay representation is inade on behatf of fhe petitioner. The petitioner raay not be iaterested ia prosecuting fhe matter. 2. In view of the foregoiag, fhe petition is disnussed for want of prosecution, Interim order dated 27.2.2004 is vacated. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge niakur