IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34489 of 2010 CHINTU NUT & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.09.10. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are languishing in custody since 22.12.2009 in a case registered under Section 395 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that 15-20 miscreants entered into the house of the informant and took away jewellery, clothes and cash amount of the informant. The victim gathered name of two accused persons, namely, Chintu Nut and Rakesh Nut from the conversation of the accused. The aforesaid two accused subsequently named the petitioner. It is submitted that there is no recovery from petitioners nor the petitioners have been put on T. I. Parade till date. The petitioners were implicated in one other case under Section 395 of the I.P.C. on the same day. Though the petitioner no. 2, namely, Chhotababu Nut, is involved in one other case also under Section 379 of the I.P.C. from before. Considering the fact that no recovery has been made from the petitioners and 2 petitioners’ name sprang up in the statement of co-accused, let the petitioners, Chintu Nut, Chhotababu Nut and Nand Kishore Nut be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 189 of 2009. Learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioners if they get involved in similar nature of offence or they fail to appear on three consecutive dates during trial. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)