IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11212 of 2008 Sudama Prasad, son of Shri Rishideo Prasad, resident of village Karanpura, P.O. Don, P.S. Darauli, District- Siwan, at present posted as Panchayat Teacher in Govt. Primary School, Karanpura, Anchal- Darauli, District- Siwan. ………… Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna 4.The District Magistrate, Siwan 5.The District Education Establishment Committee through its Chairman, the Deputy Development Commissioner, Siwan 6.The District Superintendent of Education, Siwan 7.The Prakhand Pramukh, Darauli Prakhand, District- Siwan 8.The Block Development Officer, Darauli, District- Siwan 9.The Block Education Extension Officer, Darauli, District- Siwan 10.The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Krishnapali, Block Darauli, District- Siwan 11.The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Krishnapali, Anchal- Darauli, District- Siwan. …………. Respondents ---------------------------------- 2. 20/09/2011 Petitioner has filed this writ application for a direction to the respondents to pay his honorarium/salary. It is submitted that the petitioner was appointed as Shiksha Mitra and he started discharging his duty from 10.5.2005. It is claimed that thereafter in terms of 2006 Rules his services were converted into regular service of Panchayat Teacher and he has continued as such. 2 Writ application was filed on 29.7.2008 with service of two copies of the same in the office of the learned Advocate General. However, till today, no counter affidavit has been filed in the case. In the circumstances, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to hold an enquiry with regard to validity of appointment and continuance of the petitioner in the School and his actual functioning there. If it is found that the petitioner’s appointment was valid and he became Panchayat Teacher in terms of 2006 Rules and has continued as such lawfully, they are directed to release arrears of honorarium/salary of the petitioner within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)