MP 1 wp788_11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 788 OF 2011 Shri Popat Bapu Dabade .. Petitioner Versus Bhimrao Namdev Sargar and others .. Respondents Mr. S. A. Rajeshirke for the Petitioner. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 03, 2011 P. C. : By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 1st January 2011 vide which the application filed by the present petitioner for permission to examine one material witness is rejected. 2. The application in question was filed after the plaintiff- petitioner closed his evidence vide purshis and thereafter the defendant led his evidence and also closed his evidence by filing purshis. 3. It is the contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the material witness could not be examined earlier since there was a change of Counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff-petitioner. 4. The learned trial Judge has given sound and cogent reasons while rejecting the application. No interference is warranted under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence rejected. (B.R. GAVAI, J)