IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 5 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 424 OF 2007 SMT. LEELA CHANDRASHEKHAR ... Petitioner Versus SHRI A. M. WACHASUNDAR, CHIEF ENGINEER, P. W. D. ... Respondent Mr. D. Pangam, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M. Salkar, Government advocate for the respondent. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 6th January, 2011 P.C: Mr. Pangam learned counsel or the petitioner states that he is not pressing the contempt petition but liberty be granted to the petitioner to make representation to the respondent in case the entire dues are not paid. Mr.Salkar, learned Government Advocate has no objection. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands disposed of as not pressed. The petitioner is at liberty to file representation to the respondent in case the entire dues are not paid to her. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-