IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH OCTOBER 2010 / 21ST ASWINA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 6356 of 2010() --------------------------- CMP.3988/2010 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, NADAPURAM 385/09 OF NADAPURAM POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE ................... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO. 21 : --------------------------------------------- VELLAT HARIF, S/O.POCKER, AGED 29/10, KUNIYIL HOUSE, PEROD, THUNERI BY ADV. SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT : -------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. I.V. PRAMOD THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No. 6356 of 2010 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 13th day of October, 2010 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 21st accused in Crime No.385/2009 of Nadapuram Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 353 and 188 read with 149 IPC, Section 3(1) of P.D.P.P Act and Section 3 and 5 of Explosive Substance Act, seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 13.10.2009. The petitioner's formal arrest was recorded on 27.9.2010. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending inter-alia that on 13.10.2009 and 24.10.2009 two police parties were attacked with country bombs giving rise to Crime Nos.381 and 410 of 2009. In crime No.385/2009, about 250 persons had attacked the police party necessitating 13 rounds of police firing to disburse the unlawful assembly. The petitioner was the person who supplied country bombs, which were exploded in all the above three crimes. Bail Application No. 6356 of 2010 2 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the injury sustained, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) dmb