IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17070 of 2007 CHANDESHWAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 9 1.5.2009 After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the opposite party no.2, I do not find any legal infirmity in the order passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Purnea granting maintenance in favour of petitioner’s wife and it cannot be said that the amount fixed is unreasonable. This application is dismissed with the hope that the railway authority shall ensure that the payment reaches the opposite party no.2, namely, Mala Devi regularly every month in terms of the order of the court below. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)