8 t M.- J--S< Petitioner Ku, Shubhsini Khamhari, S/o Shri Premonand Khomhari, Aged about years Teacher Tnbal Weifare Primary SchooUawahar Nagdr Bi'ock Sarangcirh Distt.. Raiaarh FC.6.1 Ver-sus ^ ^.- ;spondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh Throu9h;- -Secretary Tribal Welfare Oeparfnient, D.K.S. Bhavan, Ralpur 2. Tns &irector, PubHc •r.struetion. b.K.S. Bhcmion, Raipur- (C.e.) 3. Joint Direcfor, Public Instruction bivision; Raigarii (C.S.) 4. Assistont Commissioner Triba! >ep<t"tment bistt. [C.6.] 5. Oistrict Education-Office" [C.6.3 i. Education Office" fflOCK 5^^ rc.e:i &is '!•• Hon'bie ffi.r-. Justice K. Agnihofrt J Prssent; AAr.SaniayPatel/Advocatefor'thepetitiQner. Mr. Vinay Pandsy, Lawyer for State/respondents. o (Passed on this 19" &ay of March, 2007) 1. Tne petitioner was appointed vide ordei" dated 3.8.1987 cs Teache" (Deputy Teache") on fixed pay s.cate of Rs, 300/-. Aftef compiefion of one year probatlon, die n'os g"anted regula' poy of :. ^v £t« L'SUPi'iSO ^<y uppear-ing for the petj+ioner submits that the issue invoived t'n the is osto whether, the petitioner is entitled To regulor pay w.e.f. the or. from ths date of compietion of 3. The involved, hsrsin 'as considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribund. Tabdpu," in O.A. No. 2745/89 (iViadhukant yadu and 86 Vs. State of M.P. & ottiers), wherem it wos hetd that the simi^ar^y situated teachers are entit'ed to "eguSar pay scoie w.e.f. t'n of initial sppointment. The mat+er iiias taken-up fo tne Honble iupreme Court m SpecJQ! Lewe Petitior, (Civi!) No. 6892/93. The said petitton dis»nissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court uphoidirig fne dedsion of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitied to regyjar pay scale from of injtial »'^s*?^o*^* ^•- appoinTmen*. 4. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner fupttiersubmits that thli Court, con'sideping the jn Sushii TMW'I & others Vs. -Sovt. of Chhattisgwh A othws pA'P. (5} No. 5976 of 2006) b>' order dated 7-11-2006, has granted reguiar pay w.e.f. the of initio! oppolntment. 5. for the jojnt!y submit that this K covered by the decisron of th.'s Court in the of Sushif TMuri ortiers Vs. State Govt of Chhattisgar+i A uther's (Supra). 6. In vjeif c'f that petitton ia in the terms. No as An »-s?^t'S ^trf^-^ ^ ^e Sd/-- .,,. Satish K.Agnihotri -. Judge .; •;, \f~t^_ fT' ./-< /-'