-:4^"%;E o (? ^ A/' '3} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR HON'BLE S.B. Writ Petition No. \^5 of 2004 ^;t'S:!^i£^i^ '~°''^ RESPONDENTS 45 E. PETITIONERS : l. Ku.A Indira D/o Shri A Venkat aged about 32 years, Typist Bar Association Raipur (C.G.) 2. Manohar Jethani aged 38 yrs. S/o Dr. Varial Jethani R/o Ganesh Rani Nagar, Bans Taal, Amardeep Talkies Road, Tahsil Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1 State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Urban Develpoment Adininis -tration, DKS Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Secretary Health Departinent DKS Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) (^-^'3. Municipal Cominissioner Raipur Through Cominissioner Municipal Corporat.ion Raipur (C.G.) PETITIQM.UKDER-ARTICLES 22'6/OFTHE CONSTITUTICUa OF INDIA . FOR ISSUAWCB OF SUITABLE DIRECTIONS, ORDERS QR WRITS INCLtrDING WRITS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MAKDAMUS OR PROHIBITION ETC. s'v\ ^tCr^'^.< ^^jy^ c^. XI-HC-22 an^Tsfir fiFiRisn^T aiIltcR.HfScT s-l'^'^- r'r - L"'^-^^^ arve "^ev •?¥ 'Cfl '3^ -^WW-l, W^WW, WW^y. Sii^Macn^ ^ \. ^.^s^..[ai511^ •shKlcb•u^^'''v"''"1"^" W^ ' 200 WHWI sn*iich fei^ aii^i ^diWHf^r 2^-2005 fot-the Gdvt Shri C.R. Sahu, counsel fo>' Shri Sandeep Dubey, No.1 and 2. Shri H. B. Agrawal, Sr.| Advocate for respondent No.3 In view of the order passejd 714/2004 and 832/2004 this petit|< by the persons who are selling m|s; Road have already been already taking action, therefore, Consequently, I.A. No.; Advocate with Shri Pankaj Agrawal, in the W. P. Nos.711/2004, 712/2004, |on does not survive as the petitions filed |sat and mutton on the Amardeep Tatkies and respondent Corporation is writ petition is dismissed. also stands disposed of. disntissed tlhe 231B/2005 qiiilM^-f *<i*<nTfftetS ^)3t^H3TI^T petitioners. . Advocate Tor the State/respondents Sd/- LC.Bhadoo Judge