IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No 6317 of 2009 Gyanendra Nath Trivedi, son of late Bachcha Trivedi, resident of Village – Bindusar, P O – Bindusar, P S – Siwan Mufassil, Dist – Siwan, At present Functioning as Depot Manager, Composite IMFL Indian Made Liquor, P S – Kishanganj Town, Dist – Kishanganj - Petitioner Versus 1) Bihar State Construction Corporation Ltd through its Managing Director, Moh – Khwaza Imli, Anisabad, P S – Gardanibagh, Dist – Patna 2) The Managing Director, Bihar State Construction Corporation Ltd, Moh – Khawaza Imli, Anisabad, P S – Gardanibagh, Dist – Patna 3) Bihar State Beverage Corporation Ltd through its Managing Director, Bidhut Bhawan II, 01st Floor, Bailey Road, Patna 4) The Managing Director, Bihar State Beverage Corporation Ltd, Bidhyut Bhawan II, 01st Floor, Bailey Road, Patna - Respondents *** For the Petitioner - Mr H S Himkar, Advocate For the Construction Corp - Mr R K Shukla, Advocate For the Beverage Corp - Mr Vikas Kumar, Advocate *** 3 17.07.2009 By order dated 21.05.2009, this writ petition was directed to be listed after disposal of LPAs No 492 and 556 of 2008. This Court, while hearing similar matter, by judgment and order dated 23.06.2009 passed in CWJC No 6821 of 2009 and analogous cases, held that so far as employees of Bihar State Construction Corporation is concerned, their age of superannuation stand extended to 60 years for reasons given therein. Thereafter, similar matters were again taken up yesterday being CWJC No 8046 of 2009 which was heard and allowed by a reasoned order on 16.07.2009. While that matter was being argued, the learned counsel for the Bihar State Construction Corporation fairly conceded that the two LPAs that is LPAs No 492 and 556 of 2008 are LPAs preferred by the State and the writ petitioner of the connected 2 writ petition and not by the Corporation. This Court held that the Corporation has, thus, accepted the position that the age of superannuation stood extended and, thus, allowed the writ application in those terms. On strength of the said judgment, learned counsel for the petitioner had mentioned for listing of this writ petition under the heading “For Orders on Petition”. It was to be listed on 20th of July, 2009 but office has listed the case today. Mr H S Himkar for the petitioner and Mr R K Shukla for the Construction Corporation are present and consent that the matter may be disposed of as it is squarely covered by decision of this Court rendered yesterday in CWJC No 8046 of 2009. In view of being consensus on the issue, this writ application is also disposed of in terms of orders passed in CWJC No 6821 of 2009 and analogous cases disposed of on 23.06.2009 and CWJC No 8046 of 2009 disposed of on 16.07.2009. As the petitioner is to superannuate on 31st of July, 2009 on completion of age of 58 years, he will be deemed to be continuing in service and would superannuate at the age of 60 years in normal course. As the writ petition itself has been disposed of, no separate order need be passed in I A No 4010 of 2009. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh)