^ SINGLE BENGH )^^ Page No. IN_THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTlSGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. NQ. 462-3 /2006 i'l B PETITIONER i/> '•' ..•.••i"5^ l^" ...<^y^ ..••" ^•^£-;-- ...^^^••"""' ^y>' 'v^""" Faganu Rain Kawasi, ^ S/o Shri Guru, aged about 45 years, Occupation : Service. Revenue Department, Patwari Halka No. 71, Revenue Inspector Circle, Darabha, Tahsil - Jagdalpur, District - Bastar, (C.G.). VERSUS L-; RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh /' Through: Secretary, Revenue Departruent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Collector, District - Bastar/^ at Jagdalpur, (C.G.). 3. The Sub Divisional Officer ^" (Revenue), Jagdalpur, District - Bastar, (C.G.). QiC^^' CLEKEtoA.G^BILASPUfl ^-V ^ . <P 6 ^. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2267227 OP THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT, DIRECTION. ORDER TOJDO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER XI-HC-78 *11*1011 StlHlcti 3:5T "Mi^Kn't, ytfl+i'tis, Ridi^y —.W'.P^IHA.^. ^j^. .M-c.ii^/..;.-:.-..'.., ^ 200^, 3||^<>| tiach ('ic't;l«<<y) sn^rw R-ii* crarsn^Tsbiich SBTIW flfN'sn^T 30.8.200S Shri Bhupendra Singh, Shri Vinay Pandey, P.L. forth^ Heard. By the instant petition the pef Halka No.71, Chandragiri, Jagdatpui[; 7.7.2006 (Annexure P-5), whereby No.14, Chhotedongre, Tehsil Naraya^i The main ground of ctiallenge] Caste and as per directions ofthe Staf Scheduted Caste / Scheduled Tri&e ground is that the petitioner has beer) against fhe transfer policy framed by.tf !n the ciroumstanoes, eounsell may be allowed to make a detailed re^ respondent No.1 be direoted fo dec); accordanoe with !aw, to which learnedl Having heard learned oounsel and cirGumstances of the case, withe} case, the petitioner is allowed to No.1 atong vi/ith oopy of this petitio.'|] grievances and in turn, respondent) petitioner in aooordance with law withi| of representation after considering all ^l With the direction aforesaid, Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.^ disposed of. Certified oopy as per rutes. sihOLi' maKe trte <tll<<I<'1<fl-< 4|tl<-f) fffeIA<Rl«K ^srf^irsn^r Advoo^te for the petitioner. State on advance copy. :itioner, who is working as Patwari, Pahvari , has chaltenged the transfer order dated ie has been transferred to Pahwari Halka pur. is that the petitioner belongs to Scheduled i:e Gbvernment an employee who belongs to lould nbt be transferred repeatedly. Another transferred within a short span ofbvo years ie State for the year 2006-07. for the petitioner submits that the petitioner >resentatton to respondent No.1 and in turn, ;!de the representation of the petitioner in oounsel for the State has no objection. for the parties and havlng regard to the faots •ut expressing any opinion on the merits of a deta'ted representation to respondent within 10 days from today raising a!i his £No.1 to deoide the representation of the -i a period of 30 days from the date of reoeipt :he points raised by the petitioner. e petition stands disposed of. >574/06 and i.A. No. 8576/06 also stand i'.T.a