te Bench IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0. ^S? £9^ / 2011 PETITIONER ^. Sanat Kumar Shukla, S/o. Shri Ramkishore Shukla, Aged about 59 years and 4 months, Revenue Inspector, Office Collector, (Land Revenue), Dist. Kabirdham, (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS *** -i'-CU^.^" •^^" 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: - Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^A-- 2. Collector, Distt. Baikunthpur (C.G.) Korea, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA Hil] Blili .tfw '• SL..-<fiiSfci iilg'.gP8'"6! _Q) HIGH COL'RT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PF.TTTIONRR WRTT PETmON fS) No. 5768 of2011 Sanat Kumar Shukla. VERSUS State ofChhattisaar & Others. RRSPONDRNTS WRCT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asnihutri, J. Present: Stiri Sourabh Dangi, Advoeate for fhe petitioner. Shri Anai Sao, Govemment Advocate forthe State/regpondents. ORDER (Passed on 2781 day ofSeptember, 2011) 1. Chailenge in this petition is to the order dated 01.09.2011 (Annexure P/1) whereby, the petitioner, worfcing as Naib Tahsildar, Manendragarh, Keliiari Area, has been transferred to District Office, Koria fRleetion Branoh) on admimstrative grounds. 2. Shn Dangi.leamed coungel appearing for the petitioner submits that only 8 months are ieft for superannuation ofthe petitioner and at this stage, transferring fhe petitioner from his present piace ofposting is uniustified and contrarv to fhe transfer policv ofthe State. Thus, the game mav be auashed. 3. Shri Sao; ieamed Gnvemment Advocate appearing for the Stote/ respondents submits that if a representation is niade by the petitioner raising his grievaTices for quashing of the tmpugned transfer order, as stated above, within a period of one week, the same shail be coTisidered m aecordafice with law; as expeditiously as possiWe. In view of the above. libertv is reserved to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent autliorities Taisiiig all his grievances witliina period of one week, and thereafter. the respotident authorities shall consider and decide ttie same within a furtlier period of three weefcs. Tt is further directed that ti1i any decision on the representatioii ofthe petitioner is taken, status quo as obtains today in respect ofthe placement ofthe petitioner; sha11 be maintained. With the aforesaid observation and direction. the writ petition is disposed of. ^_- 4. Aimt SatishK.Agnihotri Judge