1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.890 OF 2006 Shri Abdul Kadar, .. Petitioner. Vs Smt.Shahida Bano Abdul Kadar Momin, Respondent. Mr Anilkumar Patil, for the petitioner. Mr U.V.Nikam, APP for the respondent. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 31st July, 2006 DATED : 31st July, 2006 DATED : 31st July, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. This petition is directed against the concurrent findings recorded by the courts below in the proceedings arising form the application filed by the respondent-wife under section 125 of Cr.P.C. The courts below, after considering the material on record have reached a conclusion that the petitioner-husband, being healthy and able bodied person, should have an income of Rs.2500 to 3000 per month, granted maintenance of Rs.700/- p.m. to the respondent-wife. From perusal of the impugned judgments, in my opinion, the finding recorded, insofar as the income of the petitioner-husband is concerned, is reasonable and does not deserve to be interfered with by this Court in its writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In the circumstances, this petition is dismissed. 2 2 2 (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)