IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8602 of 2010 RAMANUJ RAI @ ANUJ RAI SON OF LATE SURESH RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.3.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that even though the petitioner was named in the first information report as an accused, but final report was submitted against him, which was not disagreed to by the Magistrate taking cognizance and thereafter the petitioner has been summoned u/s.319 of the Cr.P.C., let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 26.12.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Khagaria in Sessions case No.295 of 2007 arising out of Parbatta P.S.case No.22 of 2001, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each - 2 - date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )