IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.398 of 2011 Dhirendra Kumar Yadav Versus The State of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- 3. 9.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This application has been filed for initiating a proceeding for contempt against the opposite parties for their alleged wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 13.1.2006 passed in CWJC No.3917 of 2000. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed pursuant to the aforesaid order of this Court. However, the service of the petitioner was terminated vide Memo No.13 dated 7th of January, 2011, as contained in Annexure 7. Learned counsel further submits that the aforesaid order is not correct as the petitioner was appointed pursuant to the order of this Court. However, the order of termination has been assailed by the petitioner by filing a separate writ application. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party-State submits that the order of this Court has been fully complied with by appointing the petitioner pursuant to the direction of this Court. Considering the submissions of the parties, I find that the order of this Court has been complied with by appointing the petitioner and as such, there is no disobedience of the order dated 13th of January, 2006 passed in CWJC No.3917 of 2000. Accordingly, this contempt application is dismissed. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)