FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4690 OF 200 APPLICATION NO. 4690 OF 200 APPLICATION NO. 4690 OF 2005 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Smt. V.R.Bhosale APP for appellant. Shri S.A.Ingawale fpr Respdt.1 to 7. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& V.G.PALSHIKAR Acg.C.J.& SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE,J. MHATRE,J. MHATRE,J. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 21ST AUGUST, 2006 21ST AUGUST, 2006 21ST AUGUST, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This application is directed against the judgment of the III Ad-hoc Asstt. Sessions Judge, Kolhapur in Sessions Case No.149 of 2003 dated 23-12-2004. 2. The incident arises out of a quarrel which took place between the complainant party and the accused party and some of the accused also received injuries. The said accused persons were also prosecuted and both the cases were tried together. The learned Judge on appreciation of evidence came to the conclusion that the prosecution has failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt the involvement of the accused persons in the alleged crime. 3. The trial Judge has considered the entire evidence on record. He has analysed the deposition of witnesses and the circumstances including recovery of weapon used etc. The appreciation cannot be called in any manner purverse so as to require interference in the order of acquittal by this court. Hence application is rejected. ...