IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 25103 of 2004 Between: M/s Anand Granties Exports (P) ltd., Rep.by its Director Sri Parvathareddy Sree Ramaiah Having its Regis. Office at D.No.58-12-2, Santhapet, Ongole, Prakasam District. -523001 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of AP rep.by its Principles Secretary and Commissioner for Industrial Promotion Secretari, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Mines and Geology B.R.K.R.Bhavan, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 3 The Asst. Director of Mines and Geolgoy Ongole, Prakasam District 4 M/s Venkata Padma Granites, Rep.by its Proprietor Mrs. M.Nageshwari W/o M.Srinivaslu, Ward 1/469/139 Indira nagar, Gudur, Nellore district 524102 5 M/s Jubilee Granites India (P) Limited No.72, Landons Road, I.A. Arihant Castle, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010 .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. P.GANGAIAH NAIDU assisted by MR.N.BHARAT BABU The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to issue a writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dt. 18/06/2001 vide proceedings No.39517/R3(2)/97 and subsequent proceedings No.1868/R3(2)/02 dt. 27/01/2003 and also the orders passed by the 1st respondent dt. 07/12/2004 in Memo.No.3124/M.II(1)/2003-9 are illegal, arbitrary, against the provisions of the Act and the rules framed there under and consequently set aside the same.” Sri P.Gangaiah Naidu, Senior Counsel assisted by Sri N.Bharat Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of orders, dated 06.04.2005 and 16.05.2006 passed during the pendency of this writ petition, the writ petition may be closed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition questioning the said two orders. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to disposal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP.Nos.32816 of 2004 and 18959 of 2008 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 22nd JULY, 2008. kvni