((-1-)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGEMENT NO.578 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.1630 OF 2004 Sanket Petrochem Limited Plaintiff versus M/s.Hindustan Processors Ltd. Defendant Mr.Dinesh P. Shah for plaintiff Ms.S.Shrikrishna i/by S.G.Lakhani for defendant. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 6th July 2005 PC : 1. Mr.Shah appearing appearing for plaintiff and Ms.Shrikrisna for defendant tender consent terms. The consent terms record willingness of the defendant to submit to a decree on admission. Consent terms are signed by authorised signatories of both - plaintiff and defendant. They are present in the Court. They confirm that a decree on admission in the sum mentioned in the terms be passed and on payment thereof the decree would be marked as fully satisfied. Consequences of default are provided for inasmuch as entire ((-2-)) decretal amount would then become due and payable and plaintiff would be entitled to execute the decree in accordance with law. Consent terms marked "X" for identification. Order in terms of consent terms. Refund of court fees as per rules. No order as to costs. In view of order on suit, Summons for Judgement No.578 of 2004 does not survive. It accordingly stands disposed off. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)