@ LNIHE HONTBLE HEGH CQEIRT OE CHHATFISGARH AT aimswg gag) WRIT BETHIQN (5mg $"%(1 Q5 291a Rajendra Prasa£ Sahu $Gn af Late Shri Buddhuram Sahu’, aged abaut 61 years, Retired Mining Sardar, Resident snf Vinage Ka§yanyun Post Devnagaf, Tahsil Surajpurg DEstrict Surguja {C‘G‘y PETITIQNER VERSUS RESPQNDENIS : /1. South Eastern Caakfielcis Limited, Seepa£ Road, E§iasm§n District BHaspur ,,.(C‘G.), through Et$ Chairman cum Managing D§rectcL The €hief Geaeral Manager, South Eastern C9a!fields Limited, Baikunthpur, gistric Karéya ($5.). x, The Deputy Regicxnai Manager‘ Sauth Eastern Coaifields Limited, Jhiimiti Sub Area, Baikunthgur Area, District Koriya {CGS}; ,4; The Deputy PerSQnnel Manager, South Eastern Coalf§e4ds Limited, Jhilmili, Pandavpara Celliery, Baikuathpur Area, District Kariya " (get WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTIQN gr, mam / t @ new WWwPcnwe’nxgiw200 WWW mmm mmm mmfiwm §wimawé¥t SB‘ : HON’BLE MR. JUS’HCE PR} TINKER DIWAKER 07. 10.2010 ”r in the present petition is that Grievance of the petitio though he is entitled for gratuity and salary for the period of 11 days i.e‘ from 16.11.09 to 30.11.09 b and his last reprssentation Counsel for ths petitioner the same has not been paid to him ated 19.8.2010 filed before the respondent No.2 has not been decided. submits that ends of justice would be served if the petitioner is pennitted to withdraw this petition and direction be issued to respon‘ representation of the petitioner. Counsel appearing for re representation of the petitioner is Acoordingly, the petition petition With the aforesaid libert} decide the pending representation of the petitioner Within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It would be the duty of ti’ concerned about the passing of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. Sd/— ient No.2 to decide the pending .spondentswhas no objection if the decided in accordance with law. er is permitted to Withdraw this r. The respondent No.2 is directed to e petitioner to apprise the authority Pritinker Diwaker Judge more (Wu) Shri V.K.Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Praveen Das, who nor nally appears for the respondents, present in the Court is directed to appear on their behalf.