1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1120 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO.991 OF 2006 Harsh Dilip Sampat & Anr. .... Plaintiffs Vs. Reliance Industries Ltd. & Ors. .... Defendants Ms Madhuri Gaikwad i/b Shri K.V. Tembe for the Plaintiffs in support. Shri Vipul Shukla for Defendant Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED: APRIL 30, 2010 P.C: 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs who have prayed for an interim injunction to prevent defendant Nos.1 and 2 from transferring the suit shares of defendant No.1 to any other person pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit. According to the learned counsel, though defendant Nos.3 and 4 are served, neither they are present nor anybody appears on their behalf. 2 2. Learned Advocate appearing for defendant Nos.1 and 2 submits that he has no objection if interim injunction, as prayed for, is granted. Under these circumstances, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Costs shall be caused in the cause. (A.P. BHANGALE, J.)