IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN THURSDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2010 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 6958 of 2010(O) -------------------------------------- [IA.NO.4898/05 IN OS. NO.642/1995 OF II ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM] .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- J.DEVARATNAM, KARAKKATTUVILAPUTHEN VEEDU, KALLIYOOR VILLAGE, PALLICHAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SMT.M.HEMALATHA. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- A.VIJAYAN, V.R.SADANAM, KALLIYOOR VILLAGE, PALLICHAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. P. BHAVADASAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C). No. 6958 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of March, 2010. JUDGMENT This is a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the court below to dispose of Ext.P3 application said to have been filed by the petitioner. 2. Petitioner instituted O.S. 642 of 1995 before the IInd Additional Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram and obtained a decree for specific performance. The history of the litigation is not necessary for the present purpose. Suffice it to say, the Second Appeal filed by the respondent met with failure and the decree became final. It is averred that the petitioner deposited the balance sale consideration and sought execution of the decree by filing Ext.P3 petition. It is contended that the said petition is being adjourned from time to time and it causes considerable prejudice to the petitioner. Therefore, it is prayed that there may be a direction to WPC.6958/2010. 2 the court below to dispose of Ext.P3 application and to complete the proceedings. 3. In the nature of the order that is proposed to be passed, notice to the respondent is unnecessary. 4. Petitioner is claimed to have complied with his part of the decree, and filed Ext.P3 petition for execution of the sale deed through court. There is no reason why the same should not be disposed of as early as possible. Thus there will be a direction to the IInd Additional Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram to take up Ext.P3 application and dispose of the same forthwith in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible at any rate within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sb.