IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42160 of 2009 AMERIKA MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 14.12.2009 Heard. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that complainant was never married to the petitioner rather he has been projected by his brother Brij Mohan Mahto with whom he has differences for family affairs as petitioner’s wife is alive so no question arises about marrying this petitioner with another lady justifying allegation of demand of dowry and torture. In the suggested facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in Complaint Case No.1078/08, Trial No.1309, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Aurangabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AnilKr.Sinha ( Mandhata Singh, J.)