IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-25106 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision: 07.12.2011 Gurdeep Singh Virk ..Petitioner Versus State of Union Territory, Chandigarh and Another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Aman Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. D.D. Sharma, Advocate for U.T. Chandigarh. ***** ALOK SINGH, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the offence punishable under Section 420 IPC can be compounded with the leave of the Court as provided under Section 320 (2) Cr.PC. He has further stated that since matter has been amicably settled, therefore, an application shall be moved before the competent Magistrate seeking leave to compound the offence under Section 320(2) Cr.PC, hence he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with the aforesaid liberty. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (ALOK SINGH) December 07, 2011 JUDGE Poonam (II)