raTuEuiGH COURT OF CHHAT-TISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G1 CIVILREVISON N0 (?£ /2005 S.B. PetitiQE.er / non Appitcant ??. ^ul^iiJ^P ^f^i^^J ^•Mohammad ^'^'s Q^W y/o yutubuddin, Aged about 58 years. R/o Qr.No.65 / B, Camp 1 Bhilai, Tahsu & Dist: Durg-(C.G.) Respondent Appucant Versus ^ . //: M^'/ .w/ QXjfi?^ / <r /.J.V ,•' jt-":fn'/ /^ .} ^/'/ ^•\^ e" Steel Authoritv of India Ltd., Conipany registered under Corapanies Aet Head OfSce New Deuu Through Dy.General Manager Town Administration Department Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai, Tahsu 8s Dist: Durg-fC.G.j CIVIL REVISION U/S 115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PKOCEDURB 1908 XI-HC-22 T^ ''-{wiw, eitii'M'.is, f'K'ii'yy SII^T'qiI R-li'sb 3D^I ?b-4ich -Mfea padma ......^...^...^.L./^ 3ii^?( i^iiwgft^ 31.01.2006 Shri Abhay Tiwari, counsel f Shri HS Patel, counsel for thi (>r the applicant. ^ raspondent. Learned counsel for the applfcant aibmits that in Civil Revision No.96/01 on 22.11.2005, this Cot|rt has already held the revision ggoinst the order passed by the Aj^peltote Ay+hority under Section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Ipnauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 not maintainable; therefore, he pr^iys for witHdrawal of the revision with liberty to toke appropriate tjeniedy available under the law to which leamed counsel for the respc^ndent has no objection. Considered. The revision is dismissed as t|i tl*llcl<i1l TWq^f 4 fsvt <r»ltril( ^T aif^tlR sn^?T ithdrawn with aforesaid liberty, Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge