IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 13.09.2010 COCP No.1794 of 2010 (O&M) Riteshwar Walia ...Petitioner Versus Mrs. Jasmeet Kaur and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. Mohd. Yousaf, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioner is that the orders passed by this Court on 09.05.2005 in a writ petition filed by the petitioner that Lecturers engaged as Guest Faculty should not be replaced by another Guest Faculty Lecturers was not being given effect to. It is contended that in the year 2007, a regular appointee was appointed and after the regular appointee has been transferred, the respondents have appointed another person as Guest Faculty. It is contended that the petitioner has not been reappointed as Guest Faculty, however, one Rupinderjit Kaur has been engaged as Guest Faculty in the subject of English and such act of the respondents is in violation of the order passed by this Court. The order passed by this Court on 09.05.2005 was to protect the continuity of engagement of the Guest Faculty Lecturers so that they should not be replaced by another contractual employee. Once the regular appointment was made and the petitioner relieved, the petitioner cannot claim pre-emptory right for engagement as Guest Faculty Lecturer for all future times. In view of the above, I do not find that any case for initiation of contempt proceedings is made out. Dismissed. 13.09.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE