IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY WRIT PETITION NO : 19631 of 1995 Between: Malkajgiri Municipality, Through Its Commissioner, Mohammed Hussain, S/o Mohammed Yousuf, R/o Malkajgiri, Rangareddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 K.Lakshmi Narayana s/o K.Somaiah R/o.10-119/1, Vinayaknagar, Balanagar, Hyderabad. (R-1 dismissed for default of court order dt.20/7/2000) 2 Additional Industrial Tribunal-cum-Additional Labour Court, Nampally, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Presiding Officer. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to call for the records concerning m.p.no.38/94 before the Additional Industrial Tribunal-cum-Additional Labour Court, Hyderabad and declare its order dt.20/1/95 as null and void by issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction specially one in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to act according to law and not enforcing the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.Sriram Krishna Moorthy, (not present) Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following: ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner is not present. Even though the writ petition was dismissed for default as against respondent No.1 by an order, dated 20.07.2000, no steps were taken to get the order of dismissal set aside. 2. Therefore, the writ petition itself stands dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________ G.BIKSHAPATHY, J Dated 07th October, 2004. YCR/KVRM To 1. The Presiding Officer, Additional Industrial Tribunal-cum-Additional Labour Court, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2. 2 CCs to G.P. for Labour, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT) 3. 2 C.D. copies.