: 1 : USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.1077 OF 2009 State Bank of India .. Plaintiff V/s. Varsha Patel & Anr. .. Defendants ..... Mr. Prasad Das i/by Goenka Law Associates for the plaintiff None for the defendants ..... CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 5th OCTOBER 2009. P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Das appearing for the plaintiff. The suit is filed on the written contract as evidenced by the documents which are mentioned in the plaint. Upon the 1st defendant approaching the bank, it sanctioned and disbursed the loan which personal loan has been guaranteed by the 2nd defendant. The defendant No.1 made an application which is duly signed by him. Upon his Application, the amount was sanctioned and disbursed and in consideration thereof, deed of guarantee was also executed. The acknowledgment / revival letter and demand notice are also referred to in the plaint. : 2 : 2. Although, the application for personal loan is made in December, 2003, sanction is of the same month and year so also the deed of guarantee. In the light of the revival letter dated 22nd June, 2006 which has been signed by the 1st defendant and which is an acknowledgment for the purposes of Section 18 of the Indian Limitation Act, the Suit claim is within limitation. The defendants are residing within the jurisdiction of this Court. The entire cause of action has also arisen within the jurisdiction of this Court. In such circumstances, the suit claim can be entertained and tried by this Court. 3. From the averments of the plaint and the contents of the documents produced, I am satisfied that the suit claim is within the jurisdiction of this Court and falls under Section XXXVII of the Civil Procedure Code. In such circumstances, the original documents are taken on record and marked X for identification. There shall be a decree as prayed. Refund of Court fees as per rules. Advocate s cost be computed as per rules. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)