?^i»»a^ ^p tl^. ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. (S) N0. -?84 /2010 )»t3 ^ PETITIONER .\vl>"^-.. >^\'-:5^.-"" ...-"* ^^""! .^^ "' \ \> ' ^•"\.-'> ^^'.>" ^y^ 1^''. ..•'•' ^•- RESPONDENTS fPurnanand Sahu, Aged about 58 years, S/o Kachchru Ram Sahu, Head Master, Government Primary School Semarkona, -Balod(C.G.) ^(^•^ !>J^cl^ 4«^4< )+&^4e4-Balod (C.G.) JE^ S:H°* - j)<4 ir^ :1. 2. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Schoot Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Durg District-Durg C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Balod, District-Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 QF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA x -78 ^ \jr.T| ^ll^llri^l, tPTTlwiO, RlrtWy< TfflcCT ^¥rf^"''^ '^'^ /' '"" Wt20 3TT^?T iracp(*jc|f^6|^) 3TT^$TcpTR-ticb cWT3n^$TaRW ^^ Sixiha ?^ITW^rfi?T3TT^9T 8B: Hon»ble8hriManlnd] a Mohan Shrivastava, J. Pibnel Novexbber, oflwhich 27.01.2010 Shri D.N. Prajapati, Shri N. Naha Roy, Leamed counsel jbr controversy raised by ^ITTJ the order dated 11th (S) No.6616/2009, copy Learaed coiuisel forl posltion. Accordiagly, fhis pe^ order dated 11th Novenibeb Petitioner is graated Ubert{y to consider his case on its If fhe petitiouer passed by fhe Madhya O.A. No.2745/89 {Madhul^int & others) aad subsequenlpy S.L.P. (CivU) No.6892/93| order would be passed by tjhc Wifh the above direction ?ounsel for the petitioiier, Lawyer for fhe State/respondents, for fhe petitioner submits fhat the ia this petition is squarely covered by ^iber, 2009 passed by this Court in W.P. has been filed as Annexure P-3, |fhe respondents does not disputeabove cpi4|[oj1vi *ii^coT^r(^^l 1<Ri^ix ^'3lRl^3T1^$T stabds Piladesh ition is also disposed of ia tenas of the r, 2009 passed m the case referred to. j to make representation, if so advised, )wn merits aad perspective^ on fhe same footings as per .order State Admiaistrative Tribunal ia Yadu ctnd 56 others Vs. State ofM.P. confirmed by fhe Suprcme Court ia by order dated 3.1.1994, appropriate he respondents authonty. ion, fhe i^istant is disposed of Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge