IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.1478 of 2006 Decided on : 03.09.2009 Sadhu Singh ... Appellant versus Jeon Singh & others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Ashok Aneja, Advocate for the appellant. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below decreeing the suit of the respondent for specific performance of agreement dated 30.11.2000 executed by the appellant in favour of the respondent. The following questions have been proposed: i) Whether the impugned judgment and decree of Courts below are result of misreading of whole evidence brought on record? ii)Whether the alleged agreement to sell dated 30.11.2000 is forged and fabricated document especially when the appellant has no authority to enter into such agreement when the land has not been partitioned? iii)Whether the impugned judgment and decree are illegal and are liable to be set aside? iv)Whether the respondent is entitled for a decree of specific performance? RSA No.1478 of 2006 -2- It would be seen that questions No.(i) to (iii) are pure questions of fact which have to be held against the appellant. With regard to question No.(iv) also which could be termed to be a question of law I find no error in the discretion so exercised by the Courts below. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed. September 03, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE