-1_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.888 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax VIII, Mumbai : Appellant v/s M/s. Associated Cables Pvt.Ltd.: Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar Advocate for Appellant Mr. A.P. Sathe Advocate for respondent Coram : Dr. S. Radhakrishnan S.J. Kathawalla, JJ. Date : 27.8.2008 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondnet. Both the learned counsels for appellant and respondent categorically states that the question of law raised in this appeal is squarely covered by the judgment in case of Commisioner of Income Tax vs Associated Cables P. Ltd.286 ITR 596(Bom) in assessee’s own case for the earlier assessment year. Therefore we answer the question in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. Under these circumstances we are not inclined to entertain above appeal. Appeal is dismissed. (S.J. Kathawalla,J.) (Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)