IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3776 of 2010 1. TEJNARAYAN YADAV, S/o Ramvrat Yadav. 2. Brajesh Yadav, S/o Tejnarayan Yadav. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 17.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. In the First Information Report it has been asserted that three persons concealing their identity had committed the murder of brother of the informant. The petitioner’s name transpired during investigation on the speculation of two witnesses that there was a possibility of them being involved since they were accused in a case instituted three days earlier. In view of the fact that there is no cogent material against the petitioners, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with - 2 - Itarhi P.S. Case No. 105 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)