HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.23042 OF 2011 ORDER: When the matter appeared in the list on 16.08.2011, none appeared for the petitioners and hence the matter was adjourned to 17.08.2011 and on 17.08.2011, a request was made to adjourn the case to 18.08.2011. On 18.08.2011, I heard Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, learned counsel for the petitioner for considerable length of time. 2. Since the petitioners herein are said to be the legal representatives of Sri Anne Babu Rao, who was as an Honourable Member of Legislative Assembly of Andhra Pradesh representing Vuyyuru constituency of Krishna District for two terms, between 1985 to 1989 and again from the year 1999 to 2001, till he died on 01.07.201, they are challenging the validity of the proceedings dated 07.04.2011 issued by the Chief Accounts Officer (Investigation), Office of the General Manager, (Central), BSNL, Hyderabad, requesting the Mandal Revenue Officer, Vuyyur to depute an officer to identify the movable and immovable properties of the defaulter namely Sri Anne Babu Rao, who committed default in making a payment of Rs.1,18,000/- to the BSNL, towards telephone bills, I suggested that it would be more appropriate to implead the Legislature Secretariat represented by its Secretary of the Legislative Assembly of Andhra Pradesh as well as the Secretary to the Government in the General Administrative Department (Political) as party respondents to this writ petition, so that the veracity of the claim of BSNL that Sri Anne Babu Rao has committed default in making payments towards the telephone call charges made by him can be ascertained. I also proposed to examine as to whether there was any policy decision by which the Honourable Members of Legislative Assembly can be provided for free telephone call charges, by virtue of the office held by them and also wanted to know if there was any scheme of reimbursing the call charges to Members of Legislative Assembly. Perhaps considering that a deeper probe in the matter is likely to cause some embarassment, the learned counsel for the petitioner requested a week’s time for securing instructions in the matter. Accordingly, the matter was adjourned. When the matter appeared on 29.08.2011, none appeared for the petitioner once again and hence the matter was ordered for to be listed for dismissal and accordingly it was listed for dismissal today. None appeared even today. 3. I therefore infer that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this case any further and hence it is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. 4. Sri R.S. Murthy, learned standing counsel for BSNL, submits that he is ready with the counter affidavit, but in view of the order passed, I have not taken the counter affidavit on record. __________________________________ Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao September 05, 2011 SP HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.23042 OF 2011 September 05, 2011 SP