V" 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. f'7c4- / 2004' Petitioner Versus Respondents Gendu Ram Khairwar S/o Bisuha Ram Khairwai', Aged about 59 yeai's, Assistaat Treasury Officer, Distaict Treasury, Collectorate, Bilaspur, R/o Mukti Dham Chowk, Mishra Bada, Sarkanda, Bilaspm'-(C.G.) 1. State of Chhatdsgai'h Thi'ough Secretaiy Department of Finance, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur-(C.G.) ,/ ^ ^^ <^^ '"...•-"" ^"^ ..^^'^ Secretaiy Department ofPanchayat aad Rural Development, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, DKS Bhawan, Raipur- (C.G.) ^T^ ^' ^ ^.^ 3. Treasmy Officer, Collectorate, Bilaspm'- (C.G.) 4. Commissioner, Treasury Accounts & Pension, Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Raipur-(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22^/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 3E?T^T'5RT feri^^ST S»)+11G^ tll^^l '^ + •^sr •^srFn^pT, 'yTft^4is, fG«!it^'i< ^^..wl.n^ TyTR^lT9b*llcb 200 •l^^r ^qfenlFT 'HR^fi ft^ <^^i< ^^m^n^r 19/8/2004 Sliri P. Divvjakar fbr the petilponer. Sliri QeiEideep Dubey, Paa:iel LoAvyer, for th.e Sta-te. RctuiTi ha-s bcciifilcd, Hearcl. It is submitted tliat thel deputation ajid he filed \vrit petlti^ disposed of by this' Court yide| dli^ctlon to make a detalled repieseiitation and on such rcprcsentation being made fhe (same shall be cousidercd decided by tne competent authorijty/respoudeut uo.4 ou merits as petifioner was transferred on 'n bearing No.726/04, whichwas order dated 7//1/200/1 vvitfi a early as possible preferably withir| date of receipt of the represeiitatio c'ompllsiicf uf rtlic ^aid urdt a period pf one month from the a. It ia fiirther subinitted that ra [r^ thc pctitiDiicr niadc thc reprcsentation befi>re ttie compete^it autliprity, wliteh not been lousofthis Couilt, lcounsel fbr the Sta-te reieiTed to ^efroin. it is aiiip|y clear thcit the decided so iar m spite of fae dircci] Qn the other hand, learaed the clocurQLent Aii]Ciexure-R/2, whe dcci^lou of thc State 1s ^waited, | Hc iurUicr ^ullinlttcd thai thc competent auftiorlty 1s tlie State G<|vt, lu vfcw of the pecuUaT zacts fcid circumstaaces as tiie eariier arder fer deciding; the repre&eiita±4^^iha.s rLot been considered, let the repreeen.totsorfe be ixiQLde by th^ dav^ asid ou ^uch|reprcscutatk?n bj petitioiier ofre^h v?ri±liiraL fifteeii ^irig iiiadc^ the 8tate Q^vt shall [^^f^r '^^M..^-—^ XI-HC-22 37T^T'^T ^Jch 3TI^T s^^w <yf^a <:\p. s^ ^ -75? "^sirqRR. ^RTH^, ^CTi^y ani^r T[^? ^l^^l 9bHl^ :^^^^"^^^^ ^ 200 'fN^T' consider aad decide the saoie 05! graiiiids iirged. TiU the deci petitioner ehall cotitinzie to v^ork It is T2ia-dc clcar that in ca? peUtloner may avail tlie remedy a Wiui tlie afore^aid obs disposed o€ Consequeiitly, M.W.P. No. Certifi&d copy as per niles. ^FFlfepN 'WT^f ^ ft^iPq^K '^3Frf;OT3n^r a reasoued order considering tfae sion of the represexitetioti, the ^tt tfaLe preser^t plaoe ofpoetiiag. |c s-iiy griczrasicc stiU. szibslste/thc failable ar law, brvations, this petition staiids 23/0-1 also staMs disposed of Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge