IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CASE NO.: CWP No.11245 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: November 18, 2008 Y.R. SURI ...PETITIONER VERSUS INDIAN DRUGS AND PHARMACEUTICALS ...RESPONDENTS LIMITED & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA. PRESENT: MR. P.S. DHALIWAL, ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER. MR. SUBHASH AHUJA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS. NO.1 & 2. MR. RAJIV MALHOTRA, CENTRAL GOVT. COUNSEL (SR. PANEL), FOR RESPONDENT NO.4. ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J.(ORAL) The petitioner who was working as Senior Design Assistant in the Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Gurgaon has prayed that directions be issued to the respondents to pay him the retiral benefits which have not been paid to him even after his retirement under the voluntary retirement scheme of IDPL. Reply has been filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 & 2 wherein it has been averred that the retiral dues have been released to the petitioner long back, details of which are given as under:- “Particulars Amount Due Amount Paid Balance Ex-gratia Rs.4,74,284/- Rs.4,63,860/- Rs.10424/- Leave Encashment Rs.53,844/- Nil Rs.53844/- Gratuity Rs.87,993/- Rs.87,993/- Nil Home Town TA Rs.6,000/- Rs.6,000/- Nil Gift Cheque Rs.500/- Rs.500/- Nil TOTAL Rs.64,268/-” CWP No.11245 of 2008 -2- It has further been averred that there is a delay in filing the writ petition as the petitioner had retired from the services of the company on 31.3.2003. After going though the reply filed by on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2, we are satisfied that, by and large, all the retiral dues have been paid to the petitioner. However, in case any amount still remains to be paid, the petitioner may file a fresh representation before the competent authority which shall be decided within a period of three months of the filing of the representation, if any. Writ petition disposed of. (ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA) JUDGE November 18, 2008 (RAJAN GUPTA) Gulati JUDGE