IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2886 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 2886 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 2886 OF 2006 Shivkant S. Singh ... Petitioner V/s. The Security Guards Board for ... Respondents Greater Bombay and Thane District & Ors. Ms. Sonali Humane i/b. Ranjana Todankar for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Topkar for respondent No.1. Mr. R.D. Suvarna for respondent No.1. Mr. Amit Shroff for respondent No. 3. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 21st December, 2006 : 21st December, 2006 : 21st December, 2006 P.C. . The petitioner has applied by application dated 25th September, 2006 for registration with respondent No.1. The respondent No. 1 to consider the same and to dispose it of according to law within eight weeks from today. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that respondent Nos.2 & 3 are engaging security guards who are not registered with respondent No.1. On behalf of respondent No.4 the learned counsel states that the petitioner is not in their employment and/or has not been deputed for service to respondent Nos.2 & 3. Respondent No. 1, if advised, to make enquiry and ( 2 ) hear the parties and if respondent No. 1 comes to the conclusion that any case is made out, then to take steps according to law. 3. With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]