1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 241 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 241 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 241 OF 2006 Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi ... Petitioner Versus The Security Guards Boarsd for Gr. Bombay and Thane District and anr. ... Respondents Ms. Ranjana Todankar for Petitioner. Mrs. Lata Desai i/by Pallavi Divekar for Respondent No. 1. Mr. R.S. Pai i/by Haresh Mehta & Co. for R. No. 2. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 13, 2006 DATED : MARCH 13, 2006 DATED : MARCH 13, 2006 P.C. . In view of the reply filed on behalf of the respondent bank, it is clear that the Respondent Bank is not the employer. Considering that the writ as prayed for cannot be granted. It will be open to the Petitioner to file a fresh petition against the employer if in law the petitioner is so entitled to. With the above observations, Petition disposed of. 2 (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)