»^w TftUA -tpj sti lags jsq Aidiq^ HIA aq 'sauo sqs ji psTuiuai sq 'STIIAIO p3}jH).s xuinoasaidl aip uiOig Suiuuiu pa(JKts pue jaq p3c(Ei wy. vo Jaq diajq^ ssyBaxacy. pue qsg zxaiaid aqi: ao piag AqjBaa B 01 iniq P3SI103B Slp. 'STEtOq S3V Ul SBM XU(.n03S(| »B t-OOS-8-TE; lto lBttt are SSBO aq^ jo •SABp ST jo faavi&Bd jo tFi^ap ai pue '-/OSS "! o&rapTm. ai miq paoaa^aas puB •o'd'1 jc| sqi paiOTAitoo seq jndqsBp 'aSptip MX)Z;/9ST •ON 'A'S psssred SOOS-J pue uoyx&uao jo ^iianigpnt' aqi ^saiB8e| •scfB^S aq^ JOj jaAMeq •^UBTiaddB aqi JGJ ajB^ (•0-0) jndqgBp ^oUtSlQ 'pqesttB^ •s-d - qSnoiqj, t[jBgsTUBi[qo jo aiBig SKOISS3R lt d (00)-mdqsBp-nsTQ 'pqBaHB-s •s-d 'iioiBsao^i 'BpeqoQ jo ^.uaiasai '^sunj.piouSv uopBdnooo 'SJBS^ OE ^noqe pa8B 'qpio TBAUIQ jo aos 'nppno SBI(B TpBireMqsiA 1»^IK> htyic l^ >1^>1»|> (PiSJ h jUhlh l-lbUjkltb j3i[ psaaysaitf^ pue qosq 3fy. H3I(^ T.USppTtt JO 33B[d vvs ^saicg: aip ar pinicuS |jsq SittAiS aq neqs aq vsfft jaq 3(oo|. poB aiaip aiitBO fttd aip nsqA •ard 00'9 inoqB |s^o% aqi paiB^s ^pug •g •ry oSjspun jatRJig o^ 'aug jo aiig ipiA SJB3A ^, Joj •ry 9/,g aoctoag Jtapun piBffsddv P3IUB31 aqi AqaiaqM [,-/, psiep aouatass jo jspuo pa^oaiip si jBaddB siqj, •g 'B^qa^ I.BJ33M uqg ^o&pV'WSfsqQ •N-VUIIS AOOZ-OT-Tl ANaoNOdsaa B*3A j,Kvn3d<ry •r'vHHsiwva^NSMiHdiMBBa'laaioiHas CS]»>B!li»S Ij^lK. .la^a^ ^ J^rF.?--^-^^-^^1^ tbKh i^lK ^MUbJ '91ift[|ie 'hWMh- te£- Da]» <blhl)5 tt^lteAjfcSj. lai^lte /'^a^ I i-^^fe, 1 » v^ys"^ 3 ZZ-3 XI-HC-22 ^€~"s%^ s^a, 'l'.. ''!». 311^1'qiT K'V'h S^V ^^iicfr ^lf^ff ~FSI -^WW-I, e>fl1y'lG, [qcliuy 3n^r xra^? inwn"gpqtg;"""""""""""""""""""^i^ 20° '^^T' sn^iTCTOcofeT inefiical wgre ^a|mst miirdermg aad also threw forehead and blood started prosecutrix was sent for Toppo (P.W. 3) examined h*r 4. Aflter completmg f&e During o-ial, 10 witaesses cu'ciunstances appeanng falsely implicated because of; trial Court has convicted aadi above. 5. Leamcd counsel for th^ examination of fhc prosecutri^c not obtaiaed which vitiates He further submitted fhat incident as in one place, itis in other place, it is stated that there is no evidence tha( niale oi^an of fhe appeBant tfae absenee of the above ei Section 375 offhe I.P.C. m nol 6. On the ofher hand, the impugned judgment. 7. Conviction of the appep, prosecutrix P.W. 1 aud P.W. ^ stoiie at her which Iiit her on her o|ozmg. After registration of the offence, esiamiaatkin where Dr. (Smt.) R. ^nd gave her report of Ex. P-6. jnvestigation, chaige shcet was filed. examiaed. The appeltant denied the him and stated that he has been laad related dispute. However, learaed scntenced the appdlant as inentioned fhle thdre thtt in leartied chiqf^l<n'T TTPRff ^ ftT3t <^R^K ^3rii(TlT3nin appeUant subinits that before luedical ^, consent of her nattual guardian was medico tegal report offhe prosecutrix. is discrepancy reganim^ fhe place of ^tated fhat it occurred in forest whereas it occurred in field. It is also ai^ued there was sl^htest pciietration of the fhe vaffaa. of the prosecutrcc aad in 9dence, tfae ofifence as defined under complete. counscl for the State has supported flas-t is based on the statement of the Dr. (Smt.) R. Toppo who esamincd fhe ['qt^ XI-HC-22 ^i^ •^. .siySlfes. ^ '--.J^ sn^i'^i WM sn^i 5h^ ^f?a 's^'^WvW, wAv'i'c, hviwy. 3n^?r ira^ HWV\1 y^^g^——————•——•——••••••^^ 200 'fq^ff' sn^r ^giwaftd ittfofmed accomtpaay prosecutrix aflter iucident. P.' date of iacident at 6.00 p.m|, tiine, accuscd caiae to hcr elder father. Wheu she ntfot home, he asked her to whereupon she accoinpaaied| coimnitted rape after tafcing hlmsclf. He also tiireateacdl intercourse, blood started the crune, he assaulted her fhere. She lodged fhe foUowing day vide Ex. P-l.| ' consent was obtained. In stated that the appellaat is of the defence fhat there is| accused. In lengfhy cross-esti has tried to nnpeach the fh.e uijury which she claims be caused ou the place in ftie cross-examination is make the testiinouy pf fhid pardcularfy when her statein|( endence as Dr. R. Toppo (P.^i on 1-9-2004 i.e. next dav 6f oo|zmg repo|rt paf-a llfcr cbt^^l'l HIHt^f Tf Is*<li <^;l-t^l< ^T sifigif sn^i W. 1 Prosecutrix has stated that on fhe a|., she was in hcr honie alone. At fhat l|iouse, enquired about her mother aad that bofh are not present in fhe liiin on fhe promise ofgiviag Gsb, hini upto a field near forest where he <|>ut her underwear and after uudressing her not to shout. As a result of the fioia her v^pna. After committmg bv a stone over her head and ued from in poUce station Kaasabel on the Before exaininiag her inedicaUy, her 9 of her cross-examinatlon, she has unde. She has denied fhe suggestion a quarrel between her father and the tamiuation of this wituess, the defence ^ibUity of this witncss by suggestmg fhat have receivcd ia the incideat coiild not however the discrepancy present of such a serious nature wtdch inav witaess iintrustworfhy or unreliabte (ent is duly corroborated bv fhe medical '. 3) who has cxamiaed the prosecutrix |fhe incideut, has stated that^secpndary [^i crcdlibUitp of in<|;ident, Aot 'IV XI-HC-22 SII^I^BT ft;-<i+ sn^i ?h^i<^ <i[?a V- :3"I';^| .14, »Tll<1<IS, [slCIKiy sn^r xRq? 111CTI g,^[q>——•—"•"•—-••••—•••—•"^F^ 200 -A- sn^r ?(<iW(ifeT ' preseijit cdi p|art, sexual character of fhe prost would was present over lcft size of 2 x 2 ciu was abrasion in size of 3 x''2 examiaation of her private reddish of sizc of 3 x Vv x inajora, one abrasion of size There was rupture of hyinen, and lacerated wound ofsizel opiaed that the iajiirtes blunt object and the uijtiri.es | caused due to intercoursc between 24-26 hotirs old categoricatty opined that the 8. Tbus froin the statement of the prosecutrfx evidence, the prosecution against tfae .appellaat beyoi^d Ulegalily or iTifirmily ia the iss.pt 9. In the result, the appe41 be dismissed and it is desctibed antl ird>in statenidnt aocordijigly chl^[H<ftTT ^WV\\ ^ fsl<i1 <f^-^l< ^Tsif^pTsn^i s^cutrix had not developed. A lacerated •fitoiital area of the head, an abrasion of on medial siirface of left th^h. An was present over right buttock. On p|art, she noticed one lacerated wouad ^ cm. verticaify present over leflt labia ^>i 1 K Vt cm on fhe r^ht labia inajora. Itenderaess and reddishness over vulva |of4x 1 x 1 cin on vagma. She has bv her were caused by hard and Ipresent over her private part could be duratktn of injunes has been opined the tiine of examination. She has plrosecutrcc has been raped. of the prosecutrix and further the is dtily corroborated by medical been able to estabUsh fhe charge aU reasonable doubt There is uo imtitigned judgment, being devoid of substancc is liable to dismissed. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge [T(t^ qf<a<^