1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 1803 OF 2010. Uttam Namdeo Rathod -: versus :- Rajusingh Gulab Rathod and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : APRIL 20, 2010. 1. The District Judge-I, Pusad had allowed the appeal of petitioner / plaintiff and has found that though title is with petitioner, no finding even prima facie in relation to possession was possible. The said Court therefore appointed a Receiver for management of the suit land as per Order XL of Code of Civil Procedure. The Trial Court thereafter passed a consequential order and has appointed Collector, as receiver. It appears that thereafter, Sub Divisional Officer has set aside the entry in revenue record in favour of respondent and because of that order petitioner / plaintiff sought review before Civil Court. That application was rejected on 23.03.2010. 2. Placing reliance upon said order of the Sub Divisional Officer, petitioner / plaintiff has now challenged 2 the order delivered in appeal and contention is, as Sub Divisional Officer has set aside the revenue entry, the petitioner as plaintiff is found in possession. It is apparent that an order of Sub Divisional Officer of no consequence in this background. The learned District Judge-I has after consideration of material on record, arrived at a particular finding and those findings are not demonstrated to be either perverse or erroneous. 3. In this situation, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter in writ jurisdiction. However, the proceedings in Regular Civil Suit No. 39/2008 on the file of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Umarkhed, District Yavatmal are expedited and that Court is directed to decide the same as early as possible and in any case by 31.01.2011. With these observations, Writ Petition is disposed of, with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.