IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3606 of 2011 Ranjit Kr. Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 3. 14.12.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct the cause heading by including respondent No.11 (Mukhiya) of the writ petition as opposite party No.11 to the present modification petition. The modification petition has been filed to correct the Sub-division regarding respondent No.6 as Piro instead of Jagdishpur and also the Block with respect to respondent Nos. 7, 8, 10 and 11 as Charpokhari instead of Jagdishpur as mentioned in the connected writ petition, i.e., C.W.J.C. No.968 of 2011. Learned counsel for the State on verification submits that the descriptions given in paragraph No.4 of the modification petition are correct. In the above circumstances, the descriptions of respondent Nos. 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11 as mentioned in the main writ petition are permitted to be rectified by making necessary corrections in the course of the day. Consequently, the descriptions of opposite party Nos. 6, 7, 2 8, 10 and 11 in the present modification petition are also permitted to be rectified in the course of the day. In the order dated 29.7.2011, the descriptions of respondent Nos. 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11 shall be read as follows: “6. Sub-divisional Magistrate, Piro, Bhojpur 7. Block Development Officer, Charpokhari, Bhojpur. 8. Block Education Extension Officer, Charpokhari, Bhojpur. 10. Panchayat Sachiv, Thakuri Panchayat, Charpokhari, Bhojpur. 11.Mukhiya Gram Panchayat, Thakuri, Charpokhari, Bhojpur.” The order dated 29.7.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No.968 of 2011 is modified to the above extent. The modification petition is, accordingly, allowed. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)