IJNR!F'RRBi^i •= s '<• 'Jf^i, SJ ^.,., '..^ "i./^ ^ c a~Q IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. fSI No. ~^Z-S] /2006 PETITIONER ^y e \0^<^1'"/- lo>^>'4'.'f-"' ..'"' _\V^1' CV.»*°f- ^ \'~>.^"f ^•M^ ~-^y t\.''^ Smt. Nishi Sharva W/o. M.L.Sharva Aged about41 years Post- Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Kamta Block Daundi, R/o. Village - Kamta, Block Daundi District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS &a / {-*C''^''i :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, Durg, Distrirt Durg (C.G.) ,3. Block Education Officer Block-Dondi,District-Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/ 2^ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND tERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS A N D^ DIRECTIO N S s\-!-??.." HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SiNGLE BENCH : HON^BLE MR.^ATJSHK.AGNIHQTRLJ. WR11PETITION (S.) N0.7237 OF 2006 Petitioner Kishore Kumar Ghosh versus Respondents Sfate of Chhattisgarhand others WRiT PETITION (S.) N0.7238 OF 2005 Petitioner Phelix Kumar Lakda versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and another Petitioner WRIT PETITION (S.) N0,7239 OF 200S Vijay Prasad Gavel versus Respondents State of ChhatSisgarh and others WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7246 OF 2006 PetLtjoner Lakhan Lal Sao Versus Respondents State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETITiON (S.) N0.7247 OF 2005 Petitioner Shankar Lal Soni versus ResDondents State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7255 OF 2006 Petitioner Bhuwan Lal Sahu versus Respondents TheState Government of Chhattisgarh and anothsr WRiT PETITION (S.) N0.72S6 OF 2006 Petitioner Smt. Sandhya Sahu versus Resoondents The Stats Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7257 OF 2006 Petitioner Ramakant Chandrakar versus -^ Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETSTION (S.) N0.7258 OF 2006 P_etitioner Tameshwar Prasad Dewangan Versus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WR1T PETITION (S.) N0.7259 OF 2006 Petitioner Ghanshyam Singh Deshmukh versus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another Petitioner WRIT PETiTION (S.l N0.7260 OF 2006 Bhuvneshwar Prasad Chandrakar versus ResDondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WR!T PETITiON (S.) N0.7261 OF 2006 Petitioner Jay Kumar Patil ResDondents versus The State Govemmsnt of Chhattisgarh and another __.----— ••••":£^ ^aaessS.K^s.^sSSi. taiiiiitStn^ie ^§ff3^^^ WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7262 OF 2006 PetUioner Respondents versus Aarti Ram Sahu The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.) NOJ263^0F^2006 Petitioner Respondents versus Lal Singh Dhankar The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7264 OF 2006 Petitjoner Respondents versus Vishnu Prasad Deshmukh The Stats Government of Chhattisgarh and another Petitioner WRIT PETITION !S.) N0.7296 OF 2006 Shekh Arman Musalman versus Respondents : State Govt. of Chhattisgarh and another %sB^»^'.;SBsT<~':'y?T=-'.-"'''~'~.~Sf(ai'ii.,.^j]—^ WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7297 OF 2006 Petitioner Arjun Singh Sahu versys Respondentg The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7298 OF 2006 Petitioner Hari Shankar Sahu yersus Respondents The State Government of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETiTION (S.) N0.7299 OF 2006 Petitioner Rameah Kumar Barle yersus Respondents The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh and another WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7300 OF 2006 Petitioner Smt. Budhantin Bai Netam versys Respondents The State Government ofChhattisgarh and another WRiT PETITION (S.l N0.7249 OF 2006 Petitioner Govind Prasad Soni versus Resoondents State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PET!TION (S.l N0.7250 OF 2006 Petitioner Lekh Ram Sahu versus ResDondents State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7251 OF 2006 Petjtioner Smt. Nishi Sharva versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others WRiT PETITION (S.l N0.7252 OF 2008 Petitioner Yogeshwar Prasad Ganguly versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.7278 OF 2006 @ Petitioner B.K.Sharma versus Respondents The State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETITION (S.i N0.7279 OF 2006 Petitioner Respondente versus D.R.Barange The State of Chhattisgarh and others WR!T PETITION (S.S N0.7280 OF 2006 Petitioner Dvvarika Prasad Ratnakar versus Respondente State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. A.N.Bhakta, Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, Mr. B.L.Dembra, Mr. Vijay K. Deshmukh and Mr. Ashwani Shukia, counsel for the petitioner(s). Mr. Arun Sao, Government Advocate, Mr. Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate and Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State'respondents. ORDER >rd (Passed on 3'° Day ofJanuary, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as also for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present batch of writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj vs. Municipat Corporation, Durg andanother1 . IE 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopssh Kumar Verma vs. The Sfate Govt. of Chhsttisgarh and anothef) and other connected matlers, decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Educstion, Bhopal and the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenciature of the Basic Training institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordingly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are a!so covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The State Govt. of Chhaftisgarh andanother) (Supra). 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of YasfMani Kumar Bharadwaj (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.T.L/D.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12- 'iF-T- 1998 and 1-3-19^ and further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of this order be placed on the record of the connected writ petitions. — - — —— — —____ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96