IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.55090 of 2007 ASHOK MATHUR, son of K.B. Mathur, Escorts Finance Ltd., N-6, Pratap Building, Cannaught Place, New Delhi. …….Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Ramesh Prasad Sinha, son of Late Bashishta Narayan Singh, 23, LBS Marg, North S.K. Puri, P.O.-Patliputra, P.S.-S.K. Puri, Patna, District- Patna. ………Opposite Parties. with Cr.Misc. No.55091 of 2007 ARVIND KUMAR, son of J.R. Vasudeva, Escorts Finance Ltd., N-6, Pratap Building, Cannaught Place, New Delhi. ……..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Ramesh Prasad Sinha, son of Late Bashishta Narayan Singh, 23, LBS Marg, North S.K. Puri, P.O.-Patliputra, P.S.-S.K.Puri, Patna, District- Patna. ……..Opposite Parties. ----------- 03. 16.04.2010 No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner and on behalf of the opposite party No. 2. Learned counsel for the State has appeared. In both the applications quashing has been prayed against the order dated 11.08.2006 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Patna in Complaint Case No. 3523(C) of 2005 whereby the learned Magistrate has rejected the petition of the petitioner filed under Section 205 of the Cr.P.C. In both applications prayer has been made for quashing the order dated 27.07.2007 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Patna in Criminal Revision No. 955 of 2006 and Criminal Revision No. 956 of 2006 whereby the learned 2 Sessions Judge has upheld the order of the learned S.D.J.M., Patna dated 11.08.2006. Since the complaint is of the year 2005 and for the last five years it appears that the petitioners are trying to resort to the provision under Section 205 Cr.P.C for not appearing in the case. Hence I do not find any merit in the present applications particularly in view of the fact that it is not apparent that what is present stage of the trial. Hence both the applications are dismissed. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)