IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 8984 of 2002 Between: Thota Venkata Rao, S/o. Vasanthaiah, R/o. Sathupalli, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Sub Inspector of Police, Penuballi, Khammam Dist. 2 Sub Divisional Police Officer, Sathupalli, Khammam Dist. 3 Superindent of Police, Khammam, Khammam Dist. 4 Yelamarthy Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Madhavaiah, R/o. Ramachandra Rao Banjar, Penubali Mandal, Khammam Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction declaring the in action of the respondents 1 to 3 herein not initiating any action on the complaints made by me namely dated 6-2- 2002, 24-3-2002, 15-04-2002 against the 4th respondent herein who without any manner of right cut away the mango garden as arbitrary, illegal and violative of all norms of principles of natural justice and consequently grant police protection to the petitioners possession and enjoyment of the land and extend Ac.9-05 guntas in RS No. 148 to 150 and 157 to 161 situated at Mandalapadu village, Penuballi Mandal, Khammam Dist and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.C.S.SASTRY Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:23.04.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{BDLNM}