: 1 : IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1422 OF 1999 SUMMONS NO. 1422 OF 1999 SUMMONS NO. 1422 OF 1999 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 1590 OF 1997 NO. 1590 OF 1997 NO. 1590 OF 1997 Maruti Video Films International. ... Plaintiff. V/s. Mr. Jagdish Sidhana & Ors. ... Defendants. And Dr. Krishna Reddy & Anr. ... Applicants. Mr. S.M. Shah for the Plaintiff. Mr. A.S. Khandeparkar for the Applicants. Mr. Tushar Bhavsar i/b. Panji & Co. for the Defendant No.1. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. 09TH 09TH 09TH OCTOBER 2007. OCTOBER 2007. OCTOBER 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- . The Applicants also claims to have a right in respect of the suit film. It is not necessary to consider the merits of the Applicants’ case at this stage. The Plaintiff has also sued inter-alia in respect of a charge in respect of the suit film. It is necessary to implead the Applicants despite the fact that prima-facie it appears that the Plaintiff’s charge : 2 : is prior to the Applicant’s charge. This is to ensure that the Applicants’ rights are not affected by any order which may be passed. This order is also without prejudice to the Applicants right to adopt appropriate independent proceedings. 2. In the circumstances, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 3. Amendment to be carried out within four weeks from today. ------