FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. CONTINUATION SHEET No. CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE. SIDE. SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1585 OF 2005. APPLICATION NO. 1585 OF 2005. APPLICATION NO. 1585 OF 2005. IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 912 OF 2003. APPEAL NO. 912 OF 2003. APPEAL NO. 912 OF 2003. Shripat S. Mandavkar. ..Applicant. vs. Swapnali Shripat Mandavkar. ..Respondents. and anr. ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearnaces,Courts’s : orders or directions : and Registrar’s orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ Shri S.M. Railkar for the applicant. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.M.KANADE,J. V.M.KANADE,J. V.M.KANADE,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 11-3-2005. 11-3-2005. 11-3-2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the applicant. 2. By an order dated 19th August 2003 this Court had issued notice to respondent No.1 which was made returnable after 3 weeks. It was also stated in the said order that if the notice is not served within the specified time, the writ petition would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. Respondent No.1 could not be served in time as a result of which writ petition was dismissed as against respondent No.1. 3. In the criminal application for restoration, the applicant has given reasons why the said notice could not be served within the time granted by this Court. Criminal writ petition is restored to file. Criminal Application No. 1585/2005 is allowed in the above terms. ----