IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA M.J.C. No. 420 of 2009 Om Prakash, son of Sri Raghoo Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Gay Ghat, Dachchni Gali, Police Station- Alamganj, District- Patna -------------- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Director (Administration)-cum-Deputy Secretary, Primary Secondary and Adult Education Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Director, Education (Primary), Bihar, Patna 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Patna. 5. The Block Education Officer, Persa, Patna ------------- Opposite Party. ------------ 3. 23.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Assistant Counsel to Government Advocate No.5. This application has been filed for recall/modification of the order dated 4.12.2008, passed in Civil Review No. 86 of 2008, whereby, as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner one week’s time was granted to comply with the order of the learned Lawazima Board of 13.8.2008. It appears that the writ petitioner filed the said Civil Review No. 86 of 2008, for review of the order dated 18.4.2007, passed in L.P.A. No. 637 of 2006, whereby the order dated 18.1.2006, passed by a learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 2740 of 2004, was up-held. Both the courts dismissed the writ petition as well as the Letters Patent Appeal on the ground that the same raised a stale claim and suffer from laches, negligence and acquiescence. The civil review application was laid before the Lawazima Board on 13.8.2008, on which date none appeared on behalf of the petitioner and four weeks’ time was granted to remove the defects. Not having been complied with, the same was laid before a Division Bench on which date, as 2 prayed for by the petitioner, one week’s time was granted to remove the defects, failing which the review application shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. Not having been complied with, the review application automatically stood rejected. It appears to be a case of negligence and laches. It is difficult for this Court to take this load arising out of such negligence of the parties. Furthermore, we have also considered the merits and agree with the orders passed in writ petition as well as in the Letters Patent Appeal. This application is accordingly rejected. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar ,J. ) (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)