IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3676 of 2003 MAHESH MEHTA @ MAHESH PRASAD MEHTA S/O LATE DOMAN MEHTA, R/O VILLAGE- JOTAILI, PO- RAHUA, PS- BIHARIGANJ DISTT- MADHEPURA----------- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, PATNA 2. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA 3. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, MADHEPURA 4. HEAD MASTER, BANSGOPAL MIDDLE SCHOOL, PURANI BAZAR, MADHEPURA 5. DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, MADHEPURA 6. TREASURY OFFICER, MADHEPURA 7. RAMBHA DEVI W/O LATE DOMAN MEHTA R/O VILL. JOTAILI PO- RAHUA, PS. BIHARIGANJ, DISTT- MADHEPURA 8. RAJESH MEHTA S/O LATE DOMAN MEHTA R/O VILL- JOTAILI PO- RAHUA, PS- BIHARIGANJ, DISTT- MADHEPURA--- RESPONDENTS ----------- 10 20.1.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The Court finds certain difficulty in essence of any clear evidence that the petitioner is son of first wife of late Doman Mehta. From the service record of Doman Mehra it is apparent that way back in the year 1985-86 he had nominated Rambha Devi, respondent no.7 as the family and the respondent authorities have granted all the benefits to the nominee. Matter of the kind and the claim raised by the petitioner cannot be decided in a proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner, if so advised may take recourse by moving a civil court of competent jurisdiction. This writ application is dismissed with the above liberty. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)