IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.829 of 2011 Suresh Singh & Ors Versus Mukesh Kumar Ojha & Ors ----------- 3 7.7.2011 KHAN The petitioners are the defendants in the suit. The plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration that the petitioners/defendants are in illegal possession of the land in question. The defendants appeared and filed their written statement. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the evidence of the plaintiffs had closed and some witnesses in the suit have been examined. The plot mentioned in Schedule 2 of the plaint was Plot No.2495. However, the plaintiffs started cross-examining the defendants in respect of Plot No.2485 which was originally not mentioned in the schedule. The petitioners submit that the plot number which was mentioned in the Schedule was 2495 has been subsequently changed to 2485. As such he had filed the amendment petition. It appears that plaintiffs have adduced their evidence and defendants have examined three witnesses. The suit is of the year 1998. There is no reason why defendants did not seek the amendment before. The remaining defendants would adduce their evidence in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations this writ petition stands disposed of. (S.P.Singh,J) 2