IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPs No. 8016,8017, 8018, 8019, 8020, 8021 & 8022, of 2011. Decided on: 24th October, 2011. 1. CWP No. 8016 of 2011. Jaram Singh. Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP No. 8017 of 2011. Parveen Kumar. Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 3. CWP No. 8018 of 2011. Suraj Parkash Mahajan. Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 4. CWP No. 8019 of 2011. Jai Singh. Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 5. CWP No. 8020 of 2011. Jaram Singh. Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 6. CWP No. 8021 of 2011. Onkar Dei. Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 7. CWP No. 8022 of 2011. Hans Raj. Vs. State of H.P. & ors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the Petitioners : Ms. Anjna Mahindroo, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim the benefit of ad hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pay fixation and increments. According to the petitioners, the issue is 2 covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State. 2. Therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter, after verifying the facts, in the light of the judgment referred to above and the eligible benefits on account of the fixation of pay shall be disbursed within a period of three months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment referred to above by the petitioner concerned. 4. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 24th October, 2011. (Justice Sanjay Karol), (tr) Judge.