IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN MONDAY, THE 10TH MARCH 2008 / 20TH PHALGUNA 1929 AS.No. 360 of 2000(B) --------------------- OS.368/1997 of I ADDL.SUB COURT,ERNAKULAM .................... APPELLANTS/DEFENDANT: ----------- 1. O.A.OUSEPH @ JOSEPH, (DIED) S/O.ANTONY, AGED 64 YEARS, OLIPPARAMBIL HOUSE, KADAVANTHRA, KOCHI-20 (*)ADDITIONAL APPELLANTS 2 TO 7 IMPLEADED 2. BABY JOSEPH, W/O.LATE O.A.JOSEPH, OLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KADAVANTHRA P.O., KOCHI-682 020. 3. O.J.ANTONY, S/O.LATE O.A.JOSEPH, OLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KADAVANTHRA P.O., KOCHI-682 020. 4. VALSA GEORGE, D/O.LATE O.A.JOSEPH, PALLYPARAMBIL HOUSE, SANTHI NAGAR, CHAKKARAPARAMBU, VENNALA P.O., KOCHI. 5. PIOUS SAJAN O.J., S/O.LATE O.A.JOSEPH, TATA COFFEE LTD. KUDAGU POST, NORTH COORG, KARNATAKA-571 232. 6. JOHN O.J., S/O.LATE O.A.JOSEPH, OLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KADAVANTHRA P.O., KOCHI-682 020. 7. MASTER LIBIN PETER, S/O.LATE PETER O.J. & LAIJU PETER, (GRANDSON OF THE LATE O.A.JOSEPH), OLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KADAVANTHRA P.O., KOCHI-20 (*) ADDITIONAL APPELLANT NOS.2 TO 7 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN I.A.NO.3292/2007 DATED 10/03/2008. BY ADV. SRI.P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON SRI.P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON AS.No. 360 of 2000(B) RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: ------------- KOCHUTHRESIA JOHNSON, W/O.JOHNSON, AGED 34 YEARS, PUNNAKKAL HOUSE, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, NADAMA, TRIPUNITHURA. BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI P.CHALY ADV.R.MAYAKRISHNAN THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON C.M.P.NO.2949/2000 IN A.S.NO.360/2000 CLOSED. SD/- P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE SD/- V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE 10/03/2008 ORDER ON I.A.NO.3072/2005 IN A.S.NO.360/2000 DISMISSED. SD/- P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE SD/- V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE 10/03/2008 \\TRUE COPY// P.R.RAMAN & V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A.S.No.360 of 2000-B & I.A.No.985/2008 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 10th day of March, 2008 J U D G M E N T P.R.RAMAN, J. I.A.No.985/2008 is a compromise petition signed by both parties and their respective counsel. We have vide separate order allowed application filed by the grandmother to act as a guardian on behalf of the additional seventh appellant minor, who is the son of her predeceased son. Therefore, in this compromise petition also, the minor is represented by the guardian so appointed. 2. This appeal is against a preliminary decree in a partition suit. During the pendency of the appeal, steps were initiated to compromise the matter. In view of the above, recording the compromise, the final decree is passed in terms thereof. 3. Respondent will produce non judicial stamp paper in accordance with the compromise in terms of Rule 236 of the Civil Rules of Practice. The Registry shall take steps in terms of Rule 237 of the Civil Rules of Practice. P.R.RAMAN, Judge V.K.MOHANAN, Judge ms