1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 3395 OF 2009 Omprakash Khushal Nakhate & anr. v. The State of Mah. & anr. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's and Registrar's orders orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. P.P. Dhok Advocate for the applicants. Mr. A.S. Sonare, A.P.P. for the Respondent. ..... CORAM: A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 22 nd FEBRUARY,_2010. Mr.Dhok prayed for adjournment on the ground that Advocate Bade is out of station. Request for adjournment refused. 2. This application is directed against the impugned order issuing process confirmed in revision by the revisional court. Both the courts have found that there is ample evidence on record to show that the applicant had collected amount of Rs.2,50,000/- from the complainant promissing him employment. However, that turned out to be fraud played on him. The impugned order shows detailed discussion about the existence of evidence against the applicants, and 2 consequently prima facie case having been made out which resulted into issuance of process against the applicants. The application has therefore no merit. The same will have to be dismissed with costs. Hence, the following order. 3. Criminal Application No. 3395 of 2009 is rejected with costs of Rs.2,000/- payable to the complainant in the trial Court, which shall be condition precedent for proceeding with the trial. The trial Court shall decide Criminal Complaint Case No. 37 of 2005 within six months from the date of receipt of Writ of this Court. JUDGE /TA/ 3