-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION NO.9 OF 2006 PETITION NO.9 OF 2006 PETITION NO.9 OF 2006 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.260 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.260 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.260 OF 2006 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: JULY 26, 2006. JULY 26, 2006. JULY 26, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Petitioners and Advocate for the Respondent No.1. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that the Petitioners may be permitted to apply for regularisation. After dismissal of the Appeal, nothing prevented the Petitioners from taking steps for applying for regularisation. No case is made out for review. Rejected. Judge. Judge. Judge.