WP(C) 226/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B K SHARMA Heard Mrs. M Das, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. U K Goswamai, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, Assam. The petitioner who claims to have been appointed as Anganwadi Worker und er Sidli I.C.D.S project in the year 2001 and thereafter, attached in 979 No. Na ngal Bhanga L.P.School in the year 2005 has filed this writ petition praying for a direction to the respondents to regularise her service as Assistant Teacher. Although, such a plea has been taken in Para 2 of the writ petition but no copy of any appointment order, either appointing her as Anganwadi Worker or as Assistant Teacher has been annexed to the writ petition. What has been annexe d are the Annexure-B and C certificates issued by the Block Mission Co-ordinator , Sidli Block dated 04.06.2008 and by the Headmaster, 979 No. Nagalbhanga L. P. School, dated 19.05.2008. The petitioner by her Annexure-E representation dated 04.08.2008 addressed to the Director of Elementary Education, Assam requested fo r her regularisation/absorption as Assistant Teacher in the school. If the petitioner was selected for appointment as Anganwadi Worker, she cannot claim regularisation and/or absorption as Assistant Teacher in a school f or which there will have to be a regular selection. Needless to say that regular isation of service is not a mode of recruitment. There is nothing to indicate th at the petitioner is appointed as Anganwadi Worker and/or Assistant Teacher purs uant to any selection, which is pre-condition to such appointment. The Writ Cour t cannot issue any direction for regularisation of service. In view of the above, no relief can be granted to the petitioner and acc ordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.