T IC-22 sn^c^i t<;-' sti^i ^i'*lN>) ^rf^tf ^s? -siMlcl'4, riTllWI'i. fawKiy 3T(^?T •q?T^ *11*IMI aifiq)""""""""""""""""""""'^ 200 Rl'b<!iT' sii^i ^giw'sfer it. (S) No.6909/2008 Smt. aboui Blocls Distt. 1. State 38 2. Devel^pineiit The Panc] (Ambjlcapur) 3. The Paac] 4. Smt. Vifla^ Tehs| (Writ Petition under Art^ I'BLB •'?«!' ^. ^ A —~AJS° SnriA.N. Paadev. coual Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. 4 Heard. Grievance 6f fhe petilf Notification issued bv the J Sai^uja, petitioner and the Rojgar Sahayak. However, order of Aanexure P-1 dated ^raf^ft'T 'WRff ^ "fe^ <f»R^R ^StPOTSD^T [Ajijaaa Yadav, W/o Rajesh Yadav, aged 19 years, R/o Vfflage Maharajganj, & P.S. - Bah-ainpi.iT, Tehs.il-Pal, psarguja [CG] ,s bf CIihattisgarh, fhrougli: the Secretary, [tment of Paachayat and Rural bpment, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur(CG) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad layat Balrampur Jila Patichayat Sarguja |, Distt. Saiyija (CG) Ctucf Executi.ve OfBcer, Jaapad layat Bah-aaipur, Distt: Saryija^CG) Anita Devi, W/o Simfl Tliakur, R/o Maharajganj, Block& P.S. Barlrampur, t-Pal, Distt: Sarguja(GG5 ble 226 ofthe Constitiitioii oflndia) id for the petitioner. Atlvocate Gcneral for fhe State. ioner is fhat in response to the F'ress aapad Pancbayat, Balrampur, District- •spondent No.4 appUed for the post of tbe Jaupad Paachayat-Balrampur vide i.8.2008 appointed the respondent No.4 ^i i.(. i a' ~"^' '^s^ ^ s:" %3|i-HC-22 311^1 ^iT R-fi* sn^r Sti+lich ^f^cT 'ssi ^HH'M, dTil'y'lto, (qffliyy sn^?T Tf5[SR tlllCTI g,^|q,--'-----------^ ^gg 'I^^T" SII^TTOITWHfCT -2- •^ as Rojgar Sahayak on the certificate wifhout verification regard was not considered. Shn Y.S. Thakur, leanl ttie State subxnits fhat the pe1 State Rural Einplonnent Gua (C) offhe National Rural Emplc Leamed counsel for the| be disposed of with Ube] representation before the Coniiuissioner witli respect who inay be furfher directe^ period. Leamed counsel for thel files fresh representation Guarantee Coiiunissioner fo| appoiataient of respondent N^ this order, the same shall Coiiuuissioner withia a perio^ the representation. In vie\v of (he above pai'ties, the iiistarit petition i^ to file fresh representatioDl Guaraatee Coniinissioner foit copy of this order. On sucpi cftH[(n<ni ^H^tf "^ 1^^ '<f^^l< ^aipOTsn^r >asis of foi^ed mark sheets aad caste |aad the objection ofthe petitioner ia this ted Dy. Advocate General appearing for ^tioner's grievance could be settled by the 1'antee (^oruinissiorier as per C?a?^se 2.2.4 \VTnent Guarantee Scherne. Ipetitipner subnuts that fhis petition raay ^y to fhe petitioner to ffle a fresh State Rural Eiiiployment Guarautee ^) fhe appointment of respondent No.4, to decide ttie same withia a specified State subiuits fhat in case the petitioner before fhe State Rural Eiuployment rediessal of her grievanee regardiag >.4 as Rojgar Sahayak along with copy of >e considered and decided by the said of four weeks froin fhe date of receipt of submissiou of leamed counsel for tbe disposed ofwith liberty to the petitioner before fhe State Rural Employment redressal of her grievances along with representation being inade, the State s w ^ 1?^- 3ij^?r:'w ^iichi sn^ 31IS% ^qi^^n ? ~3^ •*ll<ll<'f'!4, »Til'a'r®.[tCTi'My 3:ni?T xra^ *nini wiwsh "^I. 200 Rl<i<i8T" 311^1 TOIIWHfCT -3- Rural Employment Guarao:tee| the same expeditiously, prefe^ the date of receipt of fh.e repre^entation. (ftl<lf<Tqit *11*1flf'^ t«*<l <(^l<r&l< ^aiPniian^r Conmussioner shaB consider and decide •ably wittim a period of four weeks from SdA Dfiirendra Mjshr. Judge . / [T^^f^i