IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 11341 of 2008. Decided on: 22 nd December, 2010. Leela Devi. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No ________________________________________________________ __ For the petitioner. : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : It is evident from Annexure A-4, dated 15.03.2004 that the case of petitioner’s husband Shri Salig Ram was required to be considered for regularization w.e.f. 1st April, 1998. However, till date no decision has been taken by the Engineer-in-Chief, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D., Nurpur. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Engineer-in-Chief, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D., Nurpur to consider the case of petitioner’s husband for regularization on the basis of Annexure A-4, dated 15th March, 2004 with all consequential benefits, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. While taking a decision, the Engineer-in-Chief, Nurpur Division, H.P.P.W.D., Nurpur shall also take into consideration Annexure A-7, dated 16.09.1995. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 22, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No