1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.386 OF 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.884 OF 2009 M/s. Malhar Construction & Ors. )..Applicants Vs. Smt.Malthi Moreshwar Patil & Ors. )..Respondents ---- Mr. S.S. Dube for the applicants. Mr.Ram Ugrah Singh for the respondents/appellants in A.O. Miss. Sima Jain i/by M/s.Chaturvedi & Associates for the respondent no.6. ---- Coram : R.S.MOHITE,J Date : 31st March, 2010 PC 1 This is a Civil Application for variation of my order dated 12.10.2009. By the said order, Appeal from Order has been admitted after hearing both sides and in the Civil Application certain interim reliefs have been granted against the respondents in respect of 14 flats. It is now sought to be contended that the letter at page-15 to the Civil Application was in fact not signed on 31.10.2007 and was not therefore, a fresh contract as mentioned in my said order. The contention is that the said letter was in fact signed on 21.7.2007. This fact is not born out by the letter. On the contrary, the Notary has put a date as 31.10.2007. The document has been annexed to confirmation deed dated 12.8.2008. On perusal of the said deed, it is seen that it is signed by the respondents alone and is not signed by the appellants. In this view of the matter, no error can be found in the order dated 12.10.2009. Civil Application is therefore, dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE,J) 2 3