IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28646 of 2010 1. Manju Devi, W/o Umesh Singh, R/o Village- SArami, P.S.- Baniyapur, District-Saran. 2. Ritesh Singh @ Ritesh Kumar Singh Pandit, S/o Sri Brahma Singh, R/o Village-Sarami, P.S.-Baniyapur, District-Saran. …….. Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR .…….. Opposite party. ----------- 2. 05.10.2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are in custody for the offence punishable under sections 304(B) & 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the main accused is Mukesh Singh, who happens to be the husband of the deceased. He further submits that the petitioners have been implicated only because petitioner no. 1 happens to be sister-in-law of the said co-accused and petitioner no. 2 happens to be his brother. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that petitioner no. 1 is a housewife having several children whereas petitioner no. 2 is a teen-aged student and they are in custody since 06.04.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that no date of occurrence has been given in the F.I.R. and the entire allegations are absolutely baseless and vague merely with a view to falsely implicate the accused persons for some nefarious intentions. 4. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the - 2 - like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Chapra, Saran in connection with S.T. No. 354 of 2010 arising out of Baniapur P. S. Case No. 56 of 2010. Sujit (S. N. Hussain, J.)