IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.17150 of 2009 Date of Decision: August 16, 2011 Lekh Raj & others ...Petitioners Versus Superintending Canal Officer, Ferozepur Canal Circle, Ferozepur & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.S.P.S.Tinna, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.A.S.Jattana, Addl.A.G.Punjab, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr.Sandeep Khunger, Advocate, for respondent Nos.4 to 6. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. I have perused the impugned order. The justification has been given in the orders for giving extra Wari to the private respondents. I do not see any reason, which would call for interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Dismissed. August 16, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE