IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15519 of 2009 INDU SHEKHAR @ RINKU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 22.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the complainant. There is clear allegation of demand and cruelty even caused by this petitioner also, in my view also he is mainly responsible to have care of the wife but the petitioner and complainant have any occasion to live together that is in the year 2005 and at Noida. Thereafter the allegation against this petitioner is about his deserting the wife and her female child which was born after coming from Noida. For the child it is said that a policy was opened and premium was also deposited and payment to the complainant is shown by father in law, mother in law and by this petitioner but that is also of the year 2006 and on the earliest occasion of the alleged differences, for the years wife and husband are residing separately and undoubtedly the petitioner is guilty for deserting the wife but if that can be made a ground for rejection of anticipatory bail, I doubt it. Thus prayer - 2 - for anticipatory bail is allowed. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, in K.Hat P.S.Case no. 269 of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI