IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1124 of 2008 BHATTU PRASAD YADAV Versus KARU PRAJAPAT & ANR ----------- 2 5.8.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. In view of the facts the findings which have been recorded in the impugned order while rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for amendment in the plaint, have not been controverted by the petitioner in this civil revision application, it becomes clear that that such amendment sought by the petitioner was malafide and was aimed only to overcome the Pleader Commissioner’s report. That apart, the Court below has found that the amendment is belated by some ten years during which not only issues have been framed but witnesses have also been examined and therefore, when there was no explanation at all for such a belated amendment being sought by the petitioner, in my considered opinion, the Court below has not committed any jurisdictional error in refusing such prayer of the petitioner. Accordingly, this civil revision application being devoid of any merit is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)