@€SSil %^ tli i:£iii p::ffi;;: y,vw. ttf.BO ili :tli II tl:II ill^f Mll s^\ Ifil ^tsg^ £|? l-t: ?KS!:-^ 1,1?" ^'A'fj'S's ^•"v^^. if^:^^ m^.m.m^ <.. f3 HiGUCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHA'rBILASPUR .C. N0.568 of 21 «^rf.l Appellant KF Fazaluctdin Farooqui, S/o Shri MIJ Fareoqui,: aged, about ;32 yeare, R/o H1G 415 Padmnabhpur,, Durg (CG) . :1. .:ShFi'JavaRi,Miira, S/d,:Shri-PK M^^ iesponcients aged about 28 years, R/6 IVIodel Townt Supela Chowk, Bhjlai; District Dtiig 2 M/s BSBK Company, • Balkishan SaKhtawar Ki&han Nehru Nsgar, Dui^ (G:G)feJeep Gwner) • Respondents No.1 and 2 are ;fprmai. respondents, ' • • ' - 3 DhflsiQnal Manager, the New India AssuFance Co. Power House, Bhilaii District Durg (CG) ftDDliGationUnderQrderA1Rule19C.P.C.f6r readmissionaridrestGratJ<wioMW.A.N6.Z08/20Q2, Present : Shri^Amiyakant Tiwari, cpunsel fbr the petitioner. ^eSS, ISt The foliowing order of the Court was passed Shri Amiyakant Tiwari, learned Gounsei for the petitioner heard onthe restorationpetition. - ' . is ;1:r :'^s 'SS y.vs'9i, K'i'^'.r"""^ y::i& ^ '^- 2) The petitioner is seeking restoFation of M.A. No;708 of 2002 which came to be dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated2Q.09.2010. 3) On due consideraiion of the submissions of leamed counsel forthepefitipnerandthegroLincistakenin-th&restorationpetiiion, we are satisfied that the absenee of the petitioner's/appeilant's counsel on 20.09.2010, whenM.A. No;7Q8 of 2002 was faken up for hearing was based an Aonaffcte grounds. 4) M.C.G. No. i 568i20tQ, therefore, is : allc M.A.No.708 of 2002 is restored tQ its originai numher: Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge subbu