lN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHEATTISGARH w? (Sma g 3g é 12m; 133Ei‘i'iial‘’iEi? K/ Ehuvx'ariiai Amuiey, Ageci ‘a‘iyeut 57!: years Sic. 'Ehagwat Smgh Amuiey, Rio. '?o&i¥Upr'c>da, ‘ ‘ Korba, Eistrict Kcmba (CG) VERSUS 7E§F§§TiENiS 4} State roif‘éhhatti’sgarh, ‘T’i'xrough: Secretary, ‘Panc‘hayat 38L Gramm Vikas Vilihag, DKS Bhawan, 1 Raipur, $‘istrict 'Raipur (CG) 1 223 ‘Devéiopment Eemssioner, T’anchayat ami Gramm Vxkas Vibhag, Raipm, 'E'isu Raipur (CG) Chief’Engineer, Rurai Engineering Services, Vlkas Ay1iktaG$ce Raipm‘, Eistt Raipur (6G) ?’yare1a1 Chamkar, ‘ Safa-Engineer, 'Water ”Resources Eepartment, ‘At ?resent 'Pesteé at impaci :T’aachay-at i’enc‘immaé, 'Bi’iaspm, bistrict Eiiaspurr(C‘G} /, VJRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI—HC-22 7—8-2036 Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, counsel far The pefifioner‘. Mr. Safish aupfa, Depufy G Nal +0 3, an advanca capy. Heard. By fhe insfan‘i' wr‘h‘ pefif on under- Ar‘ficie 226122? of The Cgngfiw‘mion of India, The pe’rifioner as chalianged hi3 Transfer order dafecl 3Q’h Juna, 2006, passed by respon an? Ncl, whereby fhe pe‘i‘i‘i‘ianar‘ has bean framfer‘red from PadinUp eda, Karba 1‘0 Janpad Panchaycrr: Ramanujnagar, Disfric’r: Surgu‘ja, a d in fhe impugned crder if has been sham fhcf he has: bean Transferred n his own requesf. Laar'ned saunsai for ‘s‘he pe‘ri iéner‘ submh‘s Thaf fhe pefifiener had navzr raquesfad far hi$ fransfer', 1‘ ere‘far‘g, he has been Transfarr'ed an a ' wrang graund. Ziin The aircurnsTancss-.The peTiTioner may be aliowed Ta make a represehfafian 1‘0 respandenf No. and responden? No.1 be direcfed 1'0 decfde fhe same, Ta which iearnad ounsel appearing far fhe Sfm‘e has m abjec’rian. Having heard learned caunaei far fha pariies, having regard ‘io fhe faaiS cmci circumsfahces {if The cas and wii'houf exprassing a opinian on ‘ meri‘i‘s of fhe case, fhe praygr mad by iearned'counsel for The pefiiioner appears To be just fair- {md reasonab e. Therafore, ihe pefii‘ioner is ailowed Ta make a detailed represenfm‘ian an axing capy m‘ The insTcmT wriT peTiTion, raising a” his griavanceg Ta respand‘e T No.1 wiThin Ten days from Today and in Turn, respondenT N01 shall decide he same wii‘hin 3O days from The daTe \ (na nan) ‘1“. Advocm‘e far fhe SfMe/respsf1c%enfs o XI-HC—22 WWW (:9 x( 50mm ef i’rs receipt considering all fhe grlevmces raised by the pefh‘ioner, in an In fhe mean whHe, if 'i'he pefii‘ioner has mt been reiieved ii“ dafe, he shall no? be relieved, Tiil the represenfafian fiiad by him i$ decidec. Wiih fhe direcfions qforesaid, The wrii peiii‘ion siands dispased af, Censequei’ifly, M.(W.)P.Ne.303 2/2006 and I.A,No.7423/2006 aiso s‘rcnd disposed of. Pariizs are enfi‘iied “far cerfifizd capy of fhis order. /\ Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge 0% W) 3am,m,fémgt 3mm ' abjecfive manner, in accordance wifh iaw. m mam Wig: W > ‘ mmmtw ~ 2% WWEWW %Wm