IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1028 of 2010 AMOD KUMAR @ PINTU KUMAR, S/o Shri Atal Sharma. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 21.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 414 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that even though the alleged motor-cycle was said to have been recovered from the garage of the petitioner but the petitioner’s submission is that some body has brought it for repair and does not claim ownership of the same, let the petitioner above named who is accused in only one other case i.e. parent case of the subject matter of the present recovery be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 215 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit - 2 - that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. The learned Magistrate is directed to explore the possibility of amalgamating Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 215 of 2009 pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 306 of 2009 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna since both the cases arise out of the same occurrence. Let this order be communicated to the District & Sessions Judge, Patan through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)