1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE APPEAL NO. 656 OF 2004 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.582 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3482 OF 2003 Vinod Doshi Appellant vs. M/s.Rajtaru Videosonic Ltd. & Anr. Respondents Mr.Rajiv Narula i/b. M/s.Jhangiani Narula & Associates for the appellant. Mr.Swapnil Bangur i/b. Mr.A.V.Jain for the respondent no.1. CORAM : R. M. LODHA & J.P. DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED : 19th October 2004 P.C. Heard Mr.Rajiv Narula, the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. The present appellant (defendant no.2) in opposition to the notice of motion taken out by the respondent no.1 (plaintiff) made the following representation: "I say that the said picture is not my only asset. I interalia own a flat at Peddar Road being 31/31, Vikas Building, Peddar Road, Mumbai 400 026, the market value whereof is more than Rs.3 crores. In addition to above, I have copyrights in the negatives of at least seven movies being Faulad, Panchratan, Saccha Jhootha, Blackmail, Nastik, Rajkumar and Aankhen. I am a Financier, Distributor and Producer of several motion Pictures. I say that I have no intention to sell or remove them from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble 2 Court." 3. The disposal of notice of motion by the learned motion Judge in the light of the representation made by the present appellant (defendant no.2) cannot be faulted. 4. The appeal is dismissed in limine. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) (J.P. (J.P. (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.) DEVADHAR,J.) DEVADHAR,J.)