IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH OCTOBER 2011 / 27TH ASWINA 1933 RP.No. 718 of 2011 ------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENTAS.917/1996 Dated 30/05/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2: 1. GOPI, D/O. KORAPPALU, RESIDING AT MAVINIKKATTA, OF KOIPADI VILLAGE, P.O.KUMBLA, KASARAGOD TALUK AND DIST. 2. DEVAKI, D/O.KORAPPALU, RESIDING AT CHOWKIBALLUR, KUDLU, KUDLU VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK AND DIST. BY ADV. SRI.P.S.KRISHNA PILLAI SMT.S.ANJUSHA RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS 2 TO 6 AND ADDL.R 3 TO 5: 1. PADMAVATHI, W/O.RAGHAVA GATTI, RESIDING AT NEKRAJE HOUSE, DEVI NAGAR, KOIPADI VILLAGE, KUMBLA.P.O., KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. PIN-671 32. 2. DAKSHAYANI, W/O.RAGHAVA GATTI, RESIDING AT KUNTANGARDKA, NEAR WELFARE SCHOOL, KOIPADI VILLAGE, KUMBLA, KASARAGOD TALUK & DIST. AND PIN-671 321. 3. JWEVAN KUMAR, S/O.PADMAVATHI, RESIDING AT NEKARAGE HOUSE, DEVI NAGAR, KOIPADI VILLAGE, KUMBLA.P.O., KASARAGOD TALUK AND DISTRICT, PIN.671 321. 4. JYOTHI, W/O.ANANDA GATTI, HOSAMANA HOUSE, DARANDA BAGILU, PILAR, O.P.KOTTEKAR, SOMESWARA VILLAGE, MANGALORE TALUK, MANGALORE DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE. (WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE CIVIL JUDGE, MANGALORE). 5. JAYA JALAJAKSHI, D/O.PADMAVATHI, RESIDING AT KUNTANGARDKA, NEAR WELFARE SCHOOL, KOIPADY VILLAGE, P.O.KUMBLA, KASARAGOD TALUK AND DISTRICT. PIN-671 321. 6. GOPI, W/O.KORAGAPPA GATTI, RESIDING AT PAYAKANDA HOUSE, NEAR CHEDIKAVU TEMPLE, KACHIKATTE ROAD, P.O.KUMBLA, KASARAGOD TALUK AND DISTRICT. PIN-671 321. 7. DEVAKI, W/O.SATTYAPPA GETTI, RESIDING AT EDANADU HOSAMANA HOUSE, SOORAMBAIL, P.O.EDANADU, VIA-KUMBLA, KASARAGOD TALUK AND DISTRICT. PIN-671 321. 8. KAMALA, W/O.GOPALA GETTI, RESIDING AT AJJAIGOLI HOUSE, KANCHIKATTA ROAD, NEAR CHEDIKAVU TEMPLE, P.O.KUMBLA, KASARAGOD TALUK AND DISTRICT. PIN-673 321. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan & C.T.Ravikumar, JJ. ------------------------------------------------- C.M.Appl.No.1276 of 2011 & R.P.No.718 of 2011 ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of October, 2011. ORDER Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. This review petition comes up with an application seeking condonation of delay of 26 days in its institution. The judgment sought to be reviewed was issued on a first appeal in 1996 arising from a suit of 1993. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the review petitioner on merits of the review petition to decipher whether there is any sustainable ground to order notice on the delay petition. 3. The fundamental issue decided as per the judgment sought to be reviewed revolved around certain claims in connection with lands. The provisions of a purchase certificate and the provisions of a will were among the matters relied on by the parties. The conclusiveness of a certificate of purchase and RP 718/2011 2 the absence of any plea of fraud in relation to the said certificate were the matters decided. We do not find that it is vitiated by any error apparent on the face of the record of the judgment sought to be reviewed or that any ground for review exists. Hence, we do not find any ground to entertain the review petition. Resultantly, we also do not see any ground to issue notice on the application for condonation of delay. In the result, C.M. Application and the review petition are dismissed in limine. (Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge) (C.T.Ravikumar, Judge) tkv