THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.25048 OF 2009 18th November 2009 Between: Madhav Rao Biradar. …PETITIONER AND Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep.by its Chief Commissioner, Tank Bund, Hyderabad and one other. …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.25048 OF 2009 ORDER: The petitioner intended to make construction over his plot in H.No.3-3-1010, Kutbiguda, Hyderabad. For that purpose, he wanted to submit application before respondent Nos.1 and 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent Nos.1 and 2 are not receiving the applications, on the ground that they did not obtain “TSLR Certificate” and “No Objection Certificate” from the District Collector. He seeks appropriate directions in this regard. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The question as to whether it is competent for the Municipal Corporation to insist on production of “TSLR Certificate” and “No Objection Certificate” from revenue authority is no longer res integra. I n Hyderabad Potteries Private Limited v. Collector, Hyderabad[1], this Court dealt with that very question and held that a local authority cannot insist on production of “TSLR Certificate” and “No Objection Certificate” from the revenue authority. Following the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent Nos.1 and 2 to receive and process the application of the petitioner without insisting on production of “TSLR Certificate” and “No Objection Certificate”. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ (L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J) 18th November 2009 RRB [1] 2001(3) ALD 600