THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.817 OF 2010 DATED:15-11-2010. Between 1.P.Parthaaradhi and another … Petitioners And 1.K.Muniratnamma and others …Respondents. THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.817 OF 2010 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order, dated 16-02-2010 in I.A.No.154 of 2010 in O.S.No.1359 of 2001, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tirupathi, whereunder and whereby the application filed under Order I Rule 3 of CPC to permit the petitioner as general power of attorney holder of D.Parthasaradhi and D.Ravi Kumar to depose evidence on behalf of defendants 5 ad 6 was dismissed. 2. The plaintiff filed the suit for grant of perpetual injunction. There are no allegations against the present petitioner that he is trying to interfere with the possession of the plaintiff. In view of general power of attorney executed by defendants 5 and 6 in favour of petitioner, he can give evidence on behalf of defendants 5 and 6. As there is no cause of action, the trial Court dismissed the application. 3. Order I Rule 3 CPC provides for joinder of defendants in one suit, provide the conditions laid down there in are fulfilled. The underlying object of Rule 3 is to avoid multiplicity of suits and needless expenses, which can be avoided without embarrassment to the parties to the suit and also to the court. Therefore, this provision has no application to the present facts of the case. If the defendants 5 and 6 want to examine the petitioner as a witness on their behalf, they can as well do so. It was clearly observed by the trial Court that the general power of attorney was empowered to look after the future litigation only, but there is no single recital with regard to testifying as a witness in this case, which is pending. Therefore, the trial Court rightly dismissed the application and there are no grounds to interfere with the same. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed leaving open the remedies available to the petitioner under law. No order as to costs. _______________ K.C. BHANU, J DATED:15.11.2010 Hsd