IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 7222 OF 2003 PETITION NO. 7222 OF 2003 PETITION NO. 7222 OF 2003 Sushant Dayaram Bada .... Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents. Shri R.K.Mendadmar for the petitioner. Shri P.P.Kakade AGP for Respdt. 1 to 4. None for respondent no.5. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.G. PALSHIKAR & V.R. V.R. V.R. KINGAONKAR, JJ. KINGAONKAR, JJ. KINGAONKAR, JJ. DATED; DATED; DATED; 10TH MARCH, 2006. 10TH MARCH, 2006. 10TH MARCH, 2006. P.C: P.C: P.C: 1. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the orer passed by the Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee holding that the petitioner does not belong to Vankar caste. 2. The impugned order is based on evidence and proper appreciation thereof. Reason is given for not validating the certificate of the petitioner. There is, therefore, no reason to interfere with the order. It is hereby confirmed. 3. However, durinf the time the Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee was examining the validity of the petitioner’s certificate, the petitioner was undertaking education with Respondent no.5 college. The eptitioner has undergone three years of studies. Interest of justice, therefore, requires that the petitioner be allowed to complete the course for which he has taken admission. The petitioner shall not however, claim any other benefits under the said certificate which has been invalidated. 4. Writ petition disposed of accordingly. ...