i ‘ > 1N THE!HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR {C G i WRIT PETITION (S) No. gé I 1 ITIO’NER 1 I i J Chirimiri Colliery > 1 ‘ ‘ 2N We \0 \rc /1. ESP‘ON‘DENTS R /2. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 O OF INDIA I PARTICULARS,,QF THE IpFTITmNFn 9 OF 2010 ,/ Ashok Kuma Raidas Son o Shri Ram Awadh, aged abt 46 years, Occupatio ssistan Teacher, Resient of Boys Middle SchooL State of Chhattisgarh, Trough The Sec'retary, Department, Raipur (C.G.) Education Bhaa D. K. S . The District Educatin Officer, District (c.G.). r y Vidyalaya Samiti District Koriya (C.G. \The Principal, Boys Middle School Chirmiri Coliiery Vidyalaya Chirimiri, Distric i Koria aikunthi‘I y, Bpr The Chairman, Chirmii Coilier Chiriri, @ PET F THE CONSTITUTION T f ou n d At h: . wn, o , ). m , t Korya (C.G.). r Vidyaiaya, Chirimiri, District Koriya (C.G'.). VERSUS WW,W.W ! x l k { am m w .Q-gg .). ................... W 8a lob mm ‘200 Shri R. S. Baghel, counsel fo the petitioner. 3§hfPPE V; Shn‘dhar, Panel L er for the State/respondents No.1 & 2 onadvance copy. ‘ With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally, Grievance of the petitioner a set out in the petition is that in spite of direction issued by respondent No. District Education Officer for payment of remaining 20% of the salary due nd payable to the petitioner, the same Lhas‘be’en withheld by the responde s No.3 & 4. Learned counsel for the peti oner submits that the institution where the petitioner is working as a Tea her, is receiving grant in aid from the government towards payment of sal ry to the teachers and in spite of such aid provided, 20% of the amount of salary has been illegally withheld without any rhyme or reason. Taking into consideration t e nature of grievance raised by the petitioner before this Court, the res ondents No.3_ & 4 are directed to take appropriate steps pursuant to the etter dated 2942-2001 issued by the respondent No.2 and make necess ry payment to the petitioner within two months from the date of receipt f a copy of this order. Needless to emphasize, if grievance of the petit oner still survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court. With the aforesaid direction, he petition stands disposed of, Sdf~ Turnam 1 Manindra Mohan Shrivzistava judge A. E ’