IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3127 of 2010 1. RAM CHARITRA RAI S/O LATE RAM PRASAD MAHTO R/O VILL.- CHAKIA NAYATOLA, P.S.- CHAKIA, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR, BEGUSARAI DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 3. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER-CUM-CIRCLE OFFICER BARAUNI, P.S.- BARAUNI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 4. THE MUKHIA GRAM PANCHAYAT- MALHIPUR SOUTH P.S.- BARAUNI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 5. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT- MALHIPUR SOUTH P.S.- BARAUNI, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI 6. SHANTI DEVI W/O LATE NEP MAHTO R/O VILL.- CHAKIA NAYATOLA, P.S.- CHAKIA, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI ----------- 2. 13.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It appears that an application for a proceeding under Section 133 Cr. P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner and in context of which a report dated 26.9.2008 has been submitted by the Anchal Adhikari, Barauni. If the respondents are already seized of the issue, let the proceedings be taken to its logical conclusion in accordance with law after hearing all concerned, within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before the authority concerned. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)