1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No.3547 of 2006 Smt.Jaya Shrimantprasad Sengupta Petitioner Vs. The Business Co-op. Bank Ltd. & ors. Respondents Ms.Lalita Panchakshari for petitioner. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. June 05, 2006. P.C. . Heard Ms.Panchakshari, the learned counsel for the petitioner. The impugned order has been passed on 3/3/2005 in Appeal No.12 of 2005 and the Tahsildar, Nashik was directed to hand over the concerned plots to the respondent no.1-Bank within 15 days. Obviously there was no stay to the order impugned and, therefore, as at present the challenge to the same need not be gone into. . It is not disputed that the petitioner was a guarantor to the loan totalling Rs.12 lakhs and the concerned plots were hypothecated against the said loan. The reasoning given in the impugned order in allowing the appeal does not suffer from any errors apparent on the face of the record and, therefore, 2 there is no case made out to cause interference in the same by exercising supervisory powers under Article 227 of the Constitution. . The petition is rejected summarily. (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)