IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.7556 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.11.2010 Surinder Kaur ....Petitioner Versus The Sub Divisional Magistrate-cum-Land Acquisition Collector, Kharar, and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that proper application shall be made seeking stay of the recovery of the amount qua the share of the petitioner before the Court where reference under Section 31 of the Land Acquisition Act is pending. He further states otherwise also as per Section 31 Sub-section 2 proviso even if opposite party withdraws the entire amount, reference Court can direct the respondents to pay the share of the petitioner if petitioner is ultimately found to be entitled for any share. He seeks permission to withdraw this petition with aforesaid liberty. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (Alok Singh) Judge November 19, 2010 R.S.