giimiE SE—é‘éim \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH (2”* €35I/a’a)/@ A'r BILASPUR m g g (3) - v W.P. No. " ~:t (200% (S.B.) ’Smt. Manorama Mishra W/o Shri Pramod Kumar Mishra, aged about 46 years, R/o Near Godpara School, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary , Education Department , D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) ‘K ‘0 A G BXLNSPUR r , 2. Director of public Instrution , Pensidnbada Raipuf (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226OF THE ’‘ F IN u / COUNSTITUIION O DIA v c (y HIéH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (5) No. 1083 of 200/ Pei'ifioner 2 Sm‘f. Manomma Mishm Versus Responden‘rs 5+a1'e cf Chha‘i‘fisgarh & anoi’her‘ Sing‘e Bemh: Hon'b!e Mr. Jus’rice Sa'l'ish K. Agniho'l'ri. Mr Kumaresh Tiwari Advoca‘re for fhe petitioner Sm'f Amu AhLiJa Depu‘i‘y Governmem" Advoca'fe for fhe Smie/respendems O R D E R (Passeti on This 26” Day of February, 2007) Learned caunsel appearing for +he pefi'fiorie’r‘ submi1's 'i'ha'i’ f'ne pe‘i’i‘tianer is working as Assisi'ani’ Teacher/Lecfurer. The pe‘l’i'i’ioner ob'fairied B. Ed. Examinafion cerfificu‘re on 23-5-1994, on his 0W?! expenses. Learned caun§ei appear-Eng. for The pei’ifioner submi'i'sWha‘i' 'rhe quesfion involved, hereiri ash whe'fher fhe Teacher, who obwined B. Ed. Examina'i’ion Cer'rifica'fe on his own expenses is en‘ii'Hed 1'0 Two advance incremen’is. Awarding 1'0 learned counsel for 'rhe‘pe'i'iiioner, fhe pe’i’i‘iioner is en’l'il'ied 1'0 'l’ws advance incremen‘fs in View of 'l'he decision of fhis Cour'l' in 'l’he case of Yashwan‘l’ Kumar Bhumdwaj Vs. Municipal €or'pom-rio‘n, Dung and anoi‘her {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}. This Cour? in The case of Yashwan'i’ Kurnar Bhamdwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation}: burg and anofher (5upra), came ‘i'o ‘i'he conclusion ‘iha‘f ‘i'he Teachers, who had ob'i’ained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examinai’ion Cerfifica'l’e on Their own @ expen5es, are covered by The circuiar‘ da'l’ed 24.12.§8 issued by “fhe STu‘fe 6over'n‘men1’ of Madhya Pradesh. Learned caunsel for +he pe'l'i'i'ioner furfher' submi'rs fhu'f +he facfs and quesi'im of law invoived iri 'l’he preserri‘ case are squareiy covered by decision of fhis Cour+ in fhe case of Voshwam' Kumar Bhomdwaj Vs. Municipa! Corpora‘fioo, our? and ano‘i‘her’ (Supra), 'i'o which learned counsel appearing for “Hie respondents fairly concedes and agrees wi‘fh ‘l’ne avermen'l’ made by {earned counseivappearing for =f'ne pennonen Accordingiy, ‘i’he wri'f pe’ri‘l’ion is aHowed in ferms of The order passed in The case of Voshwani Kumar Bhorodwoj Vs. Municipai €orpora+iom burg and anofher (Supra), subjecf To verifica-i'ion of The faci' as 1'0 whe‘l'her ?he peri'rioner has acquired B. Ed. Examina‘fion Cerfifica'fe on his own expenses as per The circulars daTed 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 and furTher wheTher he has been paid Two advance incremenTs or noT. No order as To cosTs‘ ‘ 3 i i Sd/- i l i l l i l c‘ Satish K. Agnihctr; l Judge l Subhash