IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4274 of 2010 BHUNESHWAR SINGH & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 04.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that to justify the encroachment, a super allegation with vague allegation of abusing in the name of caste is made but after going through the FIR, there is no specification as to who from the named accused persons abused the informant in the name of her caste to humiliate. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners Bhuneshwar Singh, Tileshwar Singh, Bishwambhar Singh alias Bishambh Singh, Sudhir Singh, Bhillu Singh alias Bhilu Singh, Yamuna Singh, Chandrama Singh, Rabindra Singh, Mantu Singh, Rakesh Singh, Santosh Singh and Binod Kumar Singh in the event of arrest or surrender before the police be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/ (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. Rohtas at Sasaram in S.C./S.T. Rohtas (Dehri) P.S. Case No. 51 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down in section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Anil/ (Mandhata Singh, J.)