:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1506 OF 2005 Suresh B. Mittal ... Applicant versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr.Mahesh Jethmalani with Mr. Pranav Bandhela and Mr. S.N. Raj, for the Applicant. Mr.A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondent. Mr. Sushilkumar Halwasia, for the Complainant. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 4th March 2005 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the parties, including Counsel for the Complainant. I am informed that the Applicant has already made over the amount, which was payable to the Complainant. Counsel for the Complainant, on instructions, states that the amount has been so received by the :2: complainant. He further states that the complainant has no objection if the Applicnt is granted bail. He further states that the Complainant has no intention to precipitate the matter or to proceed with criminal action against the Applicant in view of the changed situation. However, presently, I am only considering prayer for bail and as both the Counsel for the Complainant as well as the learned A.P.P. on instructions have agreed that the relief as claimed in this application be granted, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) on the Applicant executing personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/-. Bond to be furnished before the investigating officer of the concerned police station. Application disposed of accordingly. . Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)