1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.04.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD)No.5144 of 2011 AND M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2011 T.Krishnaveni : Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Library Officer, Theni District, Theni – 625 531. 2.Thiru.N.Kesavan The District Library Officer, Theni District, Theni – 625 531. : Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the respondent in ref.Na.Ka.No.2495/A1/2010-1 dated 10.01.2011, quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent herein to treat the leave of the petitioner from 30.07.2010 as Earned Leave for a period of 24 days and the remaining period till date of joining the service as duty as per order in W.P.No.10788 of 2010 on the file of this Court. Dated 06.09.2010, within a reasonable time. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Appadurai For Respondent No.1 : Mr.N.Ilango, Government Advocate ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent No.1. 2.By consent of both the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 3. The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition, for a Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the respondent in ref.Na.Ka.No.2495/A1/2010-1 dated 10.01.2011, quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent herein to treat the leave of the petitioner from 30.07.2010 as Earned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Leave for a period of 24 days and the remaining period till date of joining the service as duty as per order in W.P.No.10788 of 2010 on the file of this Court. Dated 07.09.2010, within a reasonable time. 4. The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the impugned order of the 1st respondent dated 10.01.2011, in and by which, an order of punishment has been passed viz., stoppage of increment without cumulative for three years. 5.However, the petitioner has got remedy to file an appeal before the Director of Libraries, which is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 6. In view of the above stated position, the writ petition stand disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the appellate authority referred to above, by filing an appeal, challenging the impugned order of the 1st respondent. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 7.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at this juncture seeks for return of the original impugned order. Therefore, the Registry is directed to return the original impugned order to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. SD/- Deputy Registrar (Accounts) /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar To The District Library Officer, Theni District, Theni – 625 531. +1 CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER S.R NO. 15852 Order made in W.P.(MD)No.5144 of 2011 Dated:- 28.04.2011 ARUL PAM 30.05.2011/3C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/