IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 48606-M of 2007 Date of decision: May 18, 2009 Vijay Chopra -Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others -Respondents Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. Narinder Hooda, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3. Rajan Gupta, J.(Oral) Counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire amount, which is subject matter of the FIR, has been paid by the petitioner to the Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam. Mr. Sharma appearing for respondents No.2 & 3 does not dispute the statement made by counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Sharma further submits that in view of the payment having been made and in view of the circular, Annexure R2/2, the complaint lodged with the police shall be withdrawn. In view of the aforesaid statement made by counsel for respondents No.2 & 3, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. [Rajan Gupta] Judge May 18, 2009. 'ask'