IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN SATURDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2011 / 29TH SRAVANA 1933 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2712 of 2010() ----------------------------------------- CRA.73/2009 of SESSIONS COURT, TRIVANDRUM MC.16/2007 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-I, ATTINGAL .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): (APPELLANTS/COUNTER PETITIONERS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. KESAVA PILLAI, KESAVA VILASOM, MANKATTUMOOLA, OORUPOIKA, ATTINGAL. 2. SARADAMMA, W/O.KESAVA PILLAI, KESAVA VILASOM, MANKATTUMOOLA, OORUPOIKA, ATTINGAL. 3. SURESHKUMAR, S/O.KESAVA PILLAI, KESAVA VILASOM, MANKATTUMOOLA, OORUPOIKA, ATTINGAL. 4. USHAKUMARI, W/O.SURESH, KESAVA VILASOM, MANKATTUMOOLA, OORUPOIKA, ATTINGAL. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.RAJESH SMT.A.K.PREETHA SRI.K.M.ALEXANDER RESPONDENT(S): (RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND STATE) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ANITHAKUMARI, W/O.LATE SASIDHARAN NAIR, SARADA VILASOM, MANKATTUMOOLA, OORUPOIKA, ATTINGAL- 695 007. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.REKHA C.NAIR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J -------------------------------------- Crl.R.P No.2712 OF 2010 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of August 2011 ORDER The revision arise from a proceeding under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Several other proceedings as between the parties were pending when the aforesaid proceeding continued before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court - I, Attingal. Now, the counsel on both sides submit that the parties have settled all the disputes between them, and, so much so, the revision petitioners do not want to pursue the revision and the 1st respondent/de facto complainant does not desire to execute the order passed in the proceeding before the Magistrate. A petition jointly by both sides is also filed requesting for recording the compromise entered between the parties, and to close the present proceedings setting aside the impugned order. 2. Considering the submissions made and taking note of the joint petition filed as aforesaid, the impugned order passed in Crl.M.C No.16/2007 by the Judicial First Class Magistrate - I, Attingal , as confirmed by the learned Sessions Judge, is set aside, and the revision is disposed of. Sd/- vdv S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE //True Copy// P.A to Judge