IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2011 / 22ND ASHADHA 1933 RP.No. 513 of 2011() ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.16708/2007 Dated 17/06/2011 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): 7TH RESPONDENT --------------------------------------------------------------- GOPALAN KIZHAKKE VEETTIL, S/O.CHINDAN, AGED 61, PROPRIETOR, VEEVEES AUDITORIUM, KARIVELLUR, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.V.JAYAKUMAR NAMBOODIRI RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. T.P.RUBEENA, W/O.SULAIMAN, KHADEEJAS, PALAKKUNNU, KARIVELLUR, KANNUR DISTRICT. 670 521. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 001. 3. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 001. 4. THE ENVIRONMENT ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, PAYYANNUR. 670 520. 5. KARIVELLUR-PERALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, KARIVELLUR-PERALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KARIVELLUR P.O.670 521. tss R.P. NO.513/2011 6. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, KANNUR.670 001. 7. THE SECRETARY TO GOVT., DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVT., SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. R3 & R4 BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SC R5 BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDARAN BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ R2, R6 & R7 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss R.P. NO. 513/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ANNEXURE:1:- COPY OF THE KITCHEN OF THE AUDITORIUM TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------------- R.P.NO.513 OF 2011 in W.P.(C) No.16708 OF 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of July, 2011 ORDER After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner in the review petition seeks permission to withdraw the review petition. Permission is granted and the review petition is dismissed as withdrawn. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd