1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 8015 of 2011 Decided on: 22.9.2011 Thakur Dass ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “(a) That the respondents may be directed to record/ enter the ownership of the above land as mentioned in para 4 in the name of the petitioner and other co- sharers within a stipulated period.” 2. It is seen that the petitioner has represented his grievance by way of Annexures P-1 and P-2 and yet no action has been taken. The petitioner has also approached the Government 2 by way of Annexure P-3, but no action has been taken in the matter. 3. There will be a direction to the first respondent to take appropriate action on Annexures P-3 and P-4, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of producation of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the first respondent. 4. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. September 22, 2011 (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.