IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8662 of 2008 REWA KUMARI, W/O PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-LAKARA, P.O.-LAKARA, DISTRICT AND P.S.-RAJOUN, DISTRICT-BANKA. ……………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES, PRIMARY AND ADULT EDUCATION, GOVT.OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BANKA. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION-CUM-SUB DIVISIONAL EDUCATION OFFICER, BANKA. 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, RAJOUN, DISTRICT-BANKA. 5. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, RAJOUN (EAST), BANKA. 6. THE SECRETARY, LAKARA-PERGHARI, GRAM PANCHAYAT, WITHIN RAJOUN BLOCK, DISTRICT-BANKA. ……………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3 23.08.2011 In this writ application petitioner has challenged annexure-10, an order of the District Superintendent of Education, Banka dated 04.04.2008, by which, her appointment as Panchayat Teacher was cancelled on the ground that she had less than 45% marks in Intermediate. Learned counsel for the petitioner produces a subsequent order of the District Superintendent of Education, contained in letter no. 1392 dated 24.07.2008, and submits that in view of this subsequent order the earlier order as impugned in this writ application stands withdrawn. In that view of the matter, the writ 2 application has become infructuous and the same is disposed of as such. It is observed that, if said letter of the District Superintendent of Education dated 24.07.2008 is still in operation petitioner is entitled for all consequential benefits flowing from the said letter. Arvind/ ( J.N. Singh, J.)