IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.220 OF 2009 Mukund Arjun Ubale ...Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ...Respondent --- Shri Jay deep D. Mane for Applicant Shri D.P. Adsule, APP for the State. --- CORAM:V.M. KANADE J. DATED : 19TH JANUARY,2009 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. This is an application for anticipatory bail. 3. It is alleged that the Applicant had abused the Complainant in the name of his caste. 4. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant has invited my attention to the affidavit filed by the Complainant, which is annexed to the application, in which, the complainant has stated that he has no complaint against the present Applicant and due to fit of anger and misunderstanding he had lodged the complaint. 5. Perusal of the complaint indicates that prima facie ingredients of offence punishable under section 3(1) (10) of the S.C.S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act have been made out. Hence, application for anticipatory bail is rejected. 6. In view of the judgment of this Court in Vhatkar's case, the Applicant, in my view, has made out a prima facie case for grant of anticipatory bail. In the event of his arrest in connection with C.R. No.13 of 2008 registered at Kurduwadi Police Station, the Applicant be released on bail in a sum of Rs.5,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. The Applicant shall co-operate with the police and shall visit the concerned police station, as and when called. 7. Application is disposed of . V.M. KANADE J.