THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2881 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.156 of 2005 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Proddatur, Kadapa District against the respondent. The suit was decreed and after the decree became final, the petitioner filed E.P.No.52 of 2006 for arrest of the respondent. It was pleaded that though the respondent possessed of adequate means, he is not paying the decretal amount. The E.P. was opposed by the respondent. Through its order, dated 25.03.2009, the trial Court dismissed the E.P. Hence, this revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has earlier filed an E.P. for execution of the decree and obtained attachment of immovable properties of the respondent. The executing Court observed that the petitioner can proceed against those properties. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon Section 51 C.P.C. and submits that the petitioner has the right to choose more methods of execution than one. A plain reading of that Section does not permit a decree-holder to take recourse to more than one method of execution of the decree. The executing Court has taken the correct view of the matter. Hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:09.07.2010 kdl