CRM-M No.43 of 2011 **** Raju Sharma alias Raj Kumar vs. State of Punjab Present: Mr. A.K.Kalsy, Advocate for the petitioner. Dr.U.S.Dhaliwal, Addl. AG, Punjab. **** This is an application for anticipatory bail filed in a case bearing FIR No.185 dated 17.10.2010, under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC registered at Police Station Division No.6, Ludhiana. Learned Addl. AG states that on the basis of impersonation of missing father, the petitioner executed a power of attorney in favour of the mother who, in turn, sold the house and thereby cheated the other family members. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the money was received by the mother who actually used it for her medical treatment and who had since died. The fact of the death of the mother has been accepted by learned Addl. AG on instructions from, SI Ravel Singh. In this view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.:- i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police office as and when required; ii)that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case so as to dissuade him from CRM-M No.43 of 2011 -2- disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; and iii)that the petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE January 20 , 2011 sunita