l^y IN.THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR c . • WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^J^^P / 2010 PETITIONER : ^mt. Mitro Bai, W/o Mahindr Kumar Ram, Aged about 32 years, Occup.- Teacher, R/o- Gamhariya, Post Gamhariya, Tahsil SE Distt- Jashpiu- (C.G). VERSUS fe.^» RESPONDENTS : 1. -s> .V. ii-"'L'^."?' ..- ^)yr-^ ^- ^-fSfK^^ ^^^ 3. ...-^ State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer,. Janpad Panchyat Jashpur Nagar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) Block Education officer. Jashpur Nagar, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA_ _ _ FOR_ ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT DIRECTION ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER t ff^l Ss. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WMT PETmON (S) No. 7530 of2010 SmL Mitro Bai. RESPONDENT8 VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRJT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmJTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Aenihotrii, J. Present: Ms. Shamiila Singhai, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for tfae State/respondent No. 1 and3. ORDERCORAL) (Passed on 15U day ofJuly, 2011) .d^83' 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on mstructions, submits that ttie order iinpugned m Ihis petition has subsequently been cancelled by the respondents. Tlius, nothing surrives in this petition for adjudicatioa 2. Leamed counsel appearing for atber side does not controvert the above submission. 3. In view ofthe above, the writ petition is disniissed as having become infhictuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotr Judge ijait