IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32222 of 2011 Ajit Yadav @ Ajeet Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3 04-11-2011 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this court but this second bail petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner on the ground that the wife of deceased deposed in course of trial but she has nowhere stated the name of the petitioner nor stated this fact that her husband made statement before the police. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that Barbigha P.S. Case No. 170 of 2010 was registered against unknown persons and after ten days of the aforesaid case, the statement of one injured, namely, Sunil Kumar was recorded by the I.O. and the said Sunil Kumar stated about the involvement of the petitioner. It is further contended by him that accordingly to prosecution case itself, the aforesaid statement of Sunil Kumar was recorded in presence of his wife but when the wife of aforesaid Sunil Kumar was examined in course of trial, she has not stated about the involvement of the petitioner in the present crime. The learned trial court has reported that four witnesses have already been examined and now three witnesses including 2 the I.O. and doctor are left to be examined. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstance as well as materials available in the case diary, I direct the petitioner, namely, Ajit Yadav @ Ajeet Yadav to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each he case in connection with Barbigha P.S. Case No. 170 of 2010 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 374 of 2011 to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions judge (Fast Track Court No.- .IV) , Sheikhpura. A.K. Vishwakarma/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)