IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7205 of 2010 Date of Decision : July 07, 2010. Dhian Singh and others .....Petitioners versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners are retired employees of the Municipal Council, Amritsar. They seek a direction to extend the benefit of a decision dated 21.7.2008 rendered by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.15554 of 2007 (Gian Chand and others versus State of Punjab and others) (Annexure P-1). The petitioners have also relied upon the order dated 25.5.2009 passed by this Court in CWP No.6277 of 2009 (Bihar Lal and others versus Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and others) (Annexure P-8). The record, however, does not reveal that the petitioners have ever approached the authorities before directly knocking at the doors of C.W.P.No .7205 of 2010 2 this Court. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of at this stage with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the respondent- authorities. It is directed that as and when such representation is made, respondent No.3 shall consider and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order and keeping in view the above-cited decisions of this Court, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. Dasti. July 07, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE