:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 790 OF 2008 Mr. Satish Dayabhai Patel ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ..Respondents Mr. M. Kocharekar for petitioner. Mrs.A.S. Pai, APP for State. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & J. H. BHATIA,JJ. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & J. H. BHATIA,JJ. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & J. H. BHATIA,JJ. Dated: June 12, 2008. Dated: June 12, 2008. Dated: June 12, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Kocharekar the learned counsel for the petitioner. As the petitioner is added as one of the accused in C.R. No.116 of 2006, originally registered with the Nirmal Nagar Police Station and now transferred to the Economic Wing vide C.R. No. 57 of 2006 for the offences punishable under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 420, 120-B read with Section 34 of IPC and prays for quashing of the said C.R. 2. Mrs. Pai the learned APP has placed before us the affidavit of Shri Vilas Dasharath Kale, Police :2: Sub-Inspector, presently attached to EOW, Unit-III, CB, CID, Mumbai. The affidavit states that during the course of investigation it has now been found out that the petitioner had a specific role in manufacturing bogus and forged FDs in the value of Rs.30 crores and to be of the value of Rs.60 crores on maturity and this he had allegedly done with the help of one Mr.Amburely, an employee of the Steel Authority of India Ltd. The FDs were shown to be that of SAIL and were shown to be used for obtaining loan. Though the loan transaction did not materialise, certainly the investigation deserves to be continued. The contentions of Mr.Kocharekar that the petitioner was falsely implicated cannot be accepted, at least prima facie, and hence we do not find any case to entertain this petition. 3. Hence, the petition is rejected summarily. (J.H. Bhatia, J.) (J.H. Bhatia, J.) (J.H. Bhatia, J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)