1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. SECOND APPEAL NO.430 OF 2007. Ram & Devidas Gujarkar. ..vs.. Smt.Chetna Gujarkar & ors. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, office Memoranda of Coram Court's or Judge's appearances, Court's orders or directions order and Registrar's order. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= CORAM: C.L.PANGARKAR,J. DATE : 21st November, 2007. 1. Heard Mr.N.S.Deshpande, Advocate for the appellants. 2. The present appellant had instituted a suit for possession against alleged step-mother and alleged step-brother and sister. The said suit came to be decreed by the learned judge of the lower court holding that the plaintiff has proved the exclusive ownership of the suit property. The lower court has decreed the suit against which Smt.Chetna and her sons preferred an appeal. The appeal was allowed and the suit has been dismissed. In any case, in another suit filed between the same parties being suit No.147 of 1994, the learned judge of the trial court has held that the children born to Dashrath from Chetna have only 1/5th share in the property and Chetna has no 2 share. Obviously, therefore it is held that the present appellant too has share in the suit property and he is not the exclusive owner of the suit property. Therefore, I see no merit in the appeal. There is no substantial question of law involved. The appeal is dismissed in limine. JUDGE pzc