Ht: Bl BB c^l^l^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. (S) No. 8 52- / 2006 ,^- PETITIONER ^ \^)^ ^-•%':%'.. \^y .^'"^ay RESPONDENTS Narayan Prasad Kashyap, s/o. Shri Ramji Kashyap, aged about 47 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Brindanagar, Camp-1, Bhilai Distt.- Durg (C.G.) VERSUS BECE^O-50" CfiA)^ ^^ CUB^^-S-9<L" <c'"K {''^'SiS^?- ^.^."-^^^^. ^r^'?^ ff^/ XPKSNA Y^ g°! MAi^yA ]J ^ 1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^2. The Director, Public Instruction Department, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur -3. District Education Officer Durg, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) 4. Btock Education Officer, Durg Distt. - Durg (C.G.), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22613^ OpTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (s ^ PARTICULARS OF THE PETjTIONER. (T m W. P.(.S\ No. 852 of 2 Petitioner Naraycn Prosad Kashyap Versus ftespondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sotish K. Agnihotri. J Present: Mr. Vipin Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. A&r. Sastish 6upta, Dy. Sovt. Advocate for 1+ie "espondents/State. OR DER >th (Passed on this 13T" Day of February, 2007) 1. The petitioner- was appointed vide order dated 1.7.82 (Annexure P/l) as Assistant Teacher on fixed pay scale of Rs. 150/-. After completion of two years probation, he was gronted regular- pay scale of Rs. 169-300/-. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits tiiat the issue involyed in the case is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. 1+ie date of initiai appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers are ehtitled to regular poy scale w.e.f. the date of initial oppointmsnt. 13') The watter was taj<en-up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by •the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of 1+se Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular poy scate from date of initial appointment. 4. Learned counse! oppearing for •the petitioners fur'riier' submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Amcr Sai Ram &. others Vs. State of Chhatfisgarh & others (W.P. (S) No. 4725/ 2006) by order dated 1.9.2006, hce granted re9ular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initiat appointment. 5. Learned counsel <ypearin9 for the parties jointly submit •t+iat this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in -the case of Amar Sai Ram & ottiers Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & otiiers (Supra). Bablu 6. In view of that, this petition is disposed of in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish KAgnihotri Judge