IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11139 of 2008 DHARMENDRA RAI @ SUNIL KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 21.08.2008 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offence under section 489(B), 489(C)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that although the petitioner has been named on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused Harkhit Rai, who was arrested along with the counterfeit notes, however, during investigation no material has come against him. It has, however, come that the arrested accused Harkhit Rai and this petitioner were on inimical terms on account of difference during the election of Mukhiya and secondly the relatives of this petitioner used to object to run the unauthorized liquor shop by the relative of the aforesaid Harkhit Rai. Considering the submissions as noticed above, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, namely, Dharmendra Rai alias Sunil Kumar Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten 2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Bettiah Town P.S.Case No. 478 of 2004 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)