IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) PETITIONER: The Secretary Department of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Development, DKS Bhawan, (Chhattisgarh) Project Officer Integrated tribal development Project JashpurNagar District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) w.P.s No...... $§L1$ Virendra Kumar Rathore, Aged about 44 years, S/o Shri Haril Prasad Rathore, posted as Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Korba, District Korba (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of General Administration, DKS Bhawan, (Chhattisgarh) Mantralaya, Raipur Mantralaya, Raipur Collector District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) Shri R. S. Kanwar Posted as Block Education Officer 5. ? Office of Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare, Kanker, (Chhattisgarh) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- @ HtGH COURT $F CHHA‘FTmGH £\T QkLASPUR {Ham Ma: $ustéce WMnkar mwaker) WfiE ?‘e€§tmn {S} N9. 334T (if 23% PE?ET§QNER Virencfra Kumar Raihore VERSUS RE$§QNEENES State of Chhaiéisgarh and others. Shri Jiiendra Pali counsei for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur and Shri Shashank Thakur, PL fer the respondents/State. WRET PETEWUN UNEER AR'HCLE 226 OF THE CQNSTWUTEON GF ENDHA 9RDER (13.07.2009; firrairy. With the consent of the ceunsel fer the parties, the matter is heard Cha§ienge in this petition is to the order dated 30.6.2009 (Annexure P4) passed by respondent No.1 by which the petitioner who is working as Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Penchayat, District Korba, has been transferred to Janpad Panchayat Bhaiyathan, District Sarguja as Chief Exeeutive Oitioer. Counsei tor the petitioner submits that the present is a case of frequent transfer where in iast three years he has been transferred four times, He however submits that he wants to withdraw this petition with tibeity to make a representation to the authorities concerned. He aiso seeks a direction for eariy disposai of the representation to which oounsei for the respondents/State has no objection. ' Accordingiy, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with iiberty as aforesaid. it is directed that it the petitioner makes a representation within a period oi two weeks from the date of receipt of copy oi this order, the same wouid be decided by the authorities concerned within a further period of three weeks from the date of its receipt strictly in accordance ‘ with iaw. Tiii then the order impugned shaii be kept in abevance/e/ Sdl— I /t\ Maker i Prit'mke" D ti Judgt