1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 1135 OF 1980 The Cotton Corpn. Of India. ..Plaintiffs Vs. Mahalaxmi Fibres & Ind. Ltd. ..Defendants WITH SUIT NO. 871 OF 1981 The Cotton Corpn. Of India. ..Plaintiffs Vs. Mahalaxmi Fibres & Ind. Ltd. ..Defendants WITH SUIT NO. 936 OF 2005 Mahalaxmi Fibres and Industries Ltd. ..Plaintiffs Vs. Cotton Corporation of India Limited and Anr. ..Defendants WITH SUIT NO. 937 OF 2005 Mahalaxmi Fibres and Industries Ltd. ..Plaintiffs Vs. Cotton Corporation of India Limited and Anr. ..Defendants ----- Mr. U.M. Mahajan a/w. M/s Sarita Karnik i/b. Divekar and Co. for Plaintiffs in Suit No. 1135 of 1980 and Suit No. 871 of 1981 and Defendant No.1 in Suit No. 936 of 2005 and Suit No. 937 of 2005. Mr. Shailesh Shah i/b. Bachubhai Munim and Co. for Defendants in Suit No.1135/1980 and Suit No. 871 of 2 1981 and Plaintiffs in Suit No.936 of 2005 and Suit No. 937 of 2005. ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 2ND MARCH, 2010 P.C. 1. Parties have settled the dispute out of the Court. The Plaintiffs in both the suits, seek leave of this Court to withdraw the suits. 2. Suits are allowed to be withdrawn and are, accordingly, disposed of. The Plaintiffs are entitled to get refund of Court fees in accordance with rules. 3. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Cotton Corporation of India, on instructions, submits that the bank guarantees which were given by the Plaintiffs i.e. Mahalaxmi Fibres and Industries Limited to Cotton Corporation have been misplaced and lost. He has further submitted that he has accordingly informed to United Bank of India, Kolkata Branch. In the said letter, the Cotton Corporation of India Limited had informed the bank that they should treat the said bank guarantees as cancelled. The letter is taken on record. (V.M. KANADE J.)