IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.35828 OF 2009 SATRUDHAN SINGH @ SATRUGHAN SINGH, SON OF SRI PATHALU SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BANGRA, P.S. DEVARIYA, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 7.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the first information report. It is stated that petitioner was put on test identification but the witnesses refused to identify him. Petitioner is in custody since 19.1.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from the order of the learned Sessions Judge itself it appears that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this application is allowed. Let petitioner (Satrudhan Singh @ Satrughan Singh) be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sandeep Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Muzaffarpur in Mithanpura P.S. Case No.8/09 (G.R.Case No.127/09 & Trial - 2 - No.3346/09) with conditions as laid down in sub- section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)