IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21353 of 2010 Between: M.V.V. Satyanarayana Reddy, S/o.Rama Reddy, Age: 32 years, Occupation: Cultivation, R/o.Radheyapalem village, Rajanagaram Mandal, East Godavari District … Petitioner And The District Collector, East Godavari District, At Kakinada, and four others … Respondents Order: This Writ Petition is filed seeking Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 to 4 in not considering the representation dated 28-06-2010 filed by the petitioner and others to stop the fifth respondent herein from establishing a poultry farm in Sy.No.88 of Radheyapalem village, Rajanagaram Mandal, East Godavari District, as illegal and arbitrary. It is the case of the petitioner, a farmer and a resident of Radheyapalem village, that the fifth respondent herein is proposing to establish a poultry farm in Sy.No.88 of Radheyapalem village, Rajanagaram Mandal and the site where such farm is proposed to be established is very near to the residential houses of the villagers and if the same is allowed, it will cause inconvenience and health hazards to the residents. The grievance of the petitioner is that though the same has been brought to the notice of respondents 1 to 4 by way of representation dated 28-06- 2010 and a request was made to stop the fifth respondent from establishing the poultry farm at the site proposed, no action has been taken. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleaders for respondents 1, 3 and 4, Mr. M. Prabhakar Rao, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and also Mr. N. Siva Reddy, learned counsel for the fifth respondent. Learned counsel appearing for the fifth respondent has placed before this court, copies of approvals granted by various authorities for establishment of a poultry farm in the site in question. It is submitted by the learned counsel that, on the application made by the fifth respondent for establishment of a poultry farm, the Gram Panchayat, Radheyapalem, passed a resolution on 16-04-2010 and thereafter, by making inspections, the District Medical and Health Officer, East Godavari District, Kakinada, by proceedings D.Dis.No.069/RHS/2010, dated 26-04-2010, recommended for the proposed establishment of poultry farm. It is further submitted that the Regional Deputy Director, Town and Country Planning, Rajahmundry, has also granted technical clearance on 26-07-2010 and the local authority, i.e. the Gram Panchayat, has also granted permission to the fifth respondent to construct sheds for the purpose of the poultry farm in Sy.No.88 of Radheyapalem village, in an extent of Ac.3.00 guntas. Although it is the case of the petitioner that the proposed establishment of poultry farm by the fifth respondent herein in the site in question is near to the residential houses of the villagers and the same will cause inconvenience to them, it is to be seen that the fifth respondent has obtained necessary permissions from all the authorities concerned for establishment of such poultry farm. When the authorities have granted permission for establishment of the poultry farm in the site in question, taking into account various factors, at this stage, no direction can be issued to take action in pursuance of the representation filed by the petitioner. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the permissions granted by the authorities to the fifth respondent for establishment of the poultry farm, he is at liberty to question the same, but he is not entitled to the relief sought by him in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed, reserving liberty to the petitioner to question the permissions, granted by the authorities concerned, to the fifth respondent, if he is aggrieved. No order as to costs. ___________________ (R. SUBHASH REDDY, J) September 3, 2010 MRR