IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1759 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1759 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1759 OF 2007 IN IN IN REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO. 30838 OF 2006 REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO. 30838 OF 2006 REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO. 30838 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3125 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 3125 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 3125 OF 2006 Shri Prakash R. Shidore. ... Applicant. V/s. Divisional Joint Registrar. Co-operative Societies and others. ... Respondents. Ms.Manjiri Parasnis with Dr.V.K.Chowdhary for the applicant. R.M.Patne, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 & 2. Ajay D. Magadum i/b. S.S.Patwardhan for respondent No.4 CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 21st August 2007. DATED: 21st August 2007. DATED: 21st August 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. . Perused application. 2. This review petition is directed against the order of this Court dated 14th September, 2006 passed in Writ Petition No.3125/2006. 3. Being aggrieved by aforesaid order, L.P.A.No.223/2006 was carried to the Division Bench of this Court which was was allowed to be withdrawn vide order dated 5th December, 2006 with liberty to file review petition. That is how present review petition appears to have been filed on 9th December, 2006 along with application for condonation of delay. 4. In spite of service well in time, none of the respondents have filed their reply to the said application objecting to the condonation of delay. 5. In the above view of the matter, delay in filing review petition for the cause explained in the affidavit stands condoned. 6. Review petition be listed for motion hearing after two weeks. 7. Application stands disposed of in terms of this order with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE