:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3328 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 3328 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO. 3328 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 883 OF 2000 SUIT NO. 883 OF 2000 SUIT NO. 883 OF 2000 Rakeshkumar Cotex P.Ltd .......Plaintiffs. vs. vs. vs. Lara Agro P.Ltd .......Defendants. Shamrao B.Gore i/by.Legal Juris for the plaintiffs. Mr. Brijesh Upadya i/by.Purnanand & Co. for defendants in support. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. S.J.VAZIFDAR, J. NOVEMBER NOVEMBER NOVEMBER 20, 2006. 20, 2006. 20, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). sd/- *******