IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 6979 of 2008 Between: Master Pothuraju Udaya Bhaskar SP.Koti nagulu R/o.Chilakalapudi, Machilipatnam, Krishna district being minor reptd by his father and natural guardian, Sri OP.Koti Nagulu, S/o.Late Ramakotayya, aged 44 years R/o.Ditto Address ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Sri Varalakshmi Polytechnic , Chilakalapudi, Machilipatnam, Krishna district, rep.by its Principal Sri Ch.Krishna Murthy 2 Sri Ch.Krishna Murthy S/o.Not known Chilakalapudi,Krishna district 3 Sri Bathula Venkateswar aRao S/o.Not known Chilakalapudi, Krishna district 4 Sri O.S.Madhava Sharma S/o.Not known in Varalakshmi Polytechnic, Chilakalapudi, Krishna District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing the Hall Ticket to the petitioner for 1st year final examination 2007-08 and not allowing him to appear for thefinal examinations from 26.3.2008 for Diploma in Electrical and Electronics Engineering , as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and vitiated with malafides on the part of respondents 2 to 4 and consequently to direct the respondents to issue the Hall Ticket to the petitioner with Pin Number 07041EE085 and permit him to appear for the remaining examinations to held to till 9.4.2008 and also direct the respondents to produce the original attendance register maintained day to day in the college regarding the B Section of the 1st year DEEE Course along with the attendance register maintained for BC SC & ST students for submitting to the Social Welfare Department for verification of correctness of the percentage of attendance secured by the petitioner as mentioned by the 1st respondent in the statement datd 26.3.2008 is incorrect or to pass any other order or orders CounselforthePetitioner:SMT.N.(P).ANJANADEVI, SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition by granting him liberty to approach the contempt civil Court having jurisdiction for appropriate reliefs. Permission is accorded, and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent civil Court having jurisdiction seeking appropriate reliefs. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 17th February, 2009 Note: Furnish copy by tomorrow B/o bcj