IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL NO. 375 OF 2006 NO. 375 OF 2006 NO. 375 OF 2006 IN IN IN NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3082 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 3082 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO. 3082 OF 2005 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 2802 OF 2005 NO. 2802 OF 2005 NO. 2802 OF 2005 Anil Hukumchand Bhatia ] .. Appellant (Ori.Plaintiff) Versus 1. Ashokkumar H. Bhatia & 4 ors. ] .. Respondents (Ori.Defendants) Mr. A.H. Shah for the appellant. CORAM: R.M. LODHA, & S.A. BOBDE, JJ. DATED: 06TH NOVEMBER, 2006 P.C. : . We heard the counsel for the appellant. 2. The Appeal is from the ad-interim order. We do not find any error in the order of the learned Motion Judge refusing ad-interim relief. 3. No case for interference is made out. 4. Appeal is dismissed in limine. : 2 : 5. However, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, we request the learned Motion Judge to hear and decide the Notice of Motion expeditiously and, if possible, within three months from today. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [S.A. [S.A. [S.A. BOBDE, J.] BOBDE, J.] BOBDE, J.]