IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 1139 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE and MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- KANUBHAI LAXMANBHAI BHARWAD Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PK JANI for Petitioners PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent No. 1 SERVED for Respondent No. 2, 3, 4, 5 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE and MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 26/06/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT Upon hearing learned counsel Mr. Unwala appearing for learned counsel Mr. P.K.Jani, it appears that as concerned respondents are at present acting according to settled legal position, the petitioners have no subsisting grievance. Petition therefore requires to be disposed off. We order accordingly. O R D E R The petition stands disposed off. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Ad interim relief shall stand vacated. It is of course expected of the concerned respondents that they shall continue to act in accordance with law. [S.D. DAVE, J.] [Y.B. BHATT, J.] ***** Amp/-