IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2008 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1930 W.P.(C).No. 9370 of 2008 (M) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- V.M. JOSEPH, AGED 65, S/O.MATHEW, VELLIYAMKANDATHIL, ANTHINAD P.O., PALAI. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF RE-SURVEY, PALAI. 3. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND ACQUISITION, PONKUNNAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. I.V. PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ==================== W.P.(C) NO. 9370 OF 2008 - M ==================== Dated this the 27th day of March, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner has prayed for directing the respondents to take action on Ext.P1 and to complete the proceedings of resurvey within a time to be fixed by this court. A reading of the writ petition shows that the petitioner has filed the above representation unsatisfied with the extent of the acquired land shown by the Land Acquisition Officer. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the extent that is conceded by the Land Acquisition Act, the remedy available to the petitioner has been provided in Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act itself. Therefore, it is for the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy that is available. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp