HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Bail Application No. 1165 of 2006 CRIMINAL SIDE 1. Atikur Rehman s/o Mustakeem 2. Hafij s/o Jahoor Both residents of village Ibrahimpur, P.S. Pathri, District Haridwar ….Accused/Applicants Versus State of Uttaranchal ………. Opposite party Bail Application No. 1174 of 2006 1. Muzibur Rhaman s/o Mustakeem 2. Abdul Reman s/o Mursaleen 3. Sippa s/o Yasin All residents of village Ibrahimpur, P.S. Pathri, District Haridwar, ….Accused/Applicants Versus State of Uttaranchal ………. Opposite Party Bail Application No. 1168 of 2006 Dilsad s/o Diyasat Khan village Ibrahimpur, P.S. Pathri, District Haridwar, ….Accused/Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ………. Opposite Party Case Crime No. 79A of 2006 Under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 302 I.P.C. P.S. Pathri, District Haridwar. Dated: 21.12.2006 By the Court Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Sri K.S. Verma and Sidharth Sah, Advocate for the applicants and the A.G.A. for the prosecution. The applicants have applied for bail in case crime No. 79A of 2006, for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 302 I.P.C. Police Station, Pathari, District Haridwar. Counsel for the applicants have submitted that there are cross first information reports of the incident from both the sides. There are injuries as well on both the sides. There are more than 40 accused persons mentioned in each of the first information reports. As many as 25 co-accused have already been release don bail vide order dated 27.9.2006 passed in Bail Application No. 896 of 2006, on the ground of parity, the present accused applicants are entitled to bail. Without expressing anything on the merit of the case, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Let the accused applicants be released on bail on their furnishing personal bonds and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. Rajesh Tandon, J. Dated: 21.12.06