IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33389 of 2010 SANTOSH KUMAR, SON OF RAJENDRA PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 11.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 80 of 2009 registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code Petitioner is not named in the First Information Report but during course of the investigation two witnesses, namely, Sudama Paswan and Karan Chaudhary have named the petitioner but they have only stated to this extent that petitioner used to come at their shops and petitioner might have committed the alleged occurrence. Apart from the aforesaid materials, there are some confessional statements of co-accused persons and there is criminal antecedent of the petitioner. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was made accused in Barachatti P.S. Case No. 14 of 2009 and when he surrendered in connection with the aforesaid case, he was dragged by the Police in the present case. Considering the aforesaid submissions as well as materials available on the case diary, above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with above stated 2 Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 80 of 2009. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)