IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 3427 of 2009 Date of Decision: 9.2.2010 Jai Bhagwan ....Petitioner. Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Jagbir Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Parveen Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for the respondents. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. The petitioner has approached this Court by way of instant writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing Clause VII of the order dated 20.9.2006 (Annexure P-3) and also the order dated 10.11.2006 (Annexure P-14) whereby his request was rejected. Learned counsel for the respondents has produced a copy of office order No. 8/SE/S&W/PF-72 dated 29.1.2010 issued by respondent No.2 whereby the following Clause VII in the offer of appointment issued to the petitioner vide office memo No. 55/SE/S&W/ PF-72 dated 20.9.2006 was withdrawn:- “You will be treated as New entrant in the service of the Nigam for all intents and purposes.” The copy of the same is taken on record. CWP No. 3427 of 2009 -2- Learned counsel for the respondents states that in view of the above, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid fact. He, however, states that the petitioner shall be entitled to all consequential relief following therefrom by the withdrawal of Clause VII of the offer of appointment. Learned counsel for the respondents states that all the consequential benefits in pursuance of the withdrawal of the said clause which ensues to the petitioner shall be released to him. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. February 9, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE