IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 11655 of 2008 Between: Viswanadhuni Venkata Saibaba S/o.Late Narasimham R/o.9th ward Kanigiri village & Mandal Prakasam District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Superintendent of Police, District Police office Ongole Prakasam District 3 The Station House officer, Kanigiri Police station Kanigiri Town & Mandal, Prakasam District 4 The Sub Registrar , Sub Registrar office, Kangiri Town & Mandal, Prakasam District 5 Viswanadhuni Satyanarayana S/o.Late Narasimham Pidili village & Mandal Prakasam District 6 Smt.Pata Kottu Santha Kumari W/o.Chinna Narayana REddy Nagireddypalli village Veligandla Mandal, Prakasam District 7 Smt.Mukku Padmavathi W/o.Venkata REddy Papaipalli village Veligandla Mandal Prakasam District 8 Mukku Venkata Rami Reddy S/o.Peda Koti Reddy Immadicheruvu village Veligandla Mandal, Prakasam District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 permitting the Sale Deed of Executant Respondent No.5 by getting registration in the names of Respondents No. 6 to 8 for the land belonging to the petitioner undivided land admeasuring Ac.3.52 cents in SY.Nos.441/2 and 442/1 of Kanigiri Town & Mandal, Prakasam District as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and violative of Article 14,21 and 300- A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 not to interfere by supporting to the respondents No. 6 to 8 on behest of Respondent No.5 for wrongful gains by putting into possession of the land belonging to the petitioner undivided land admeasuring Ac.3.52 cent sinSY.Nos.441/2 and 442/1 of Kanigiri Town & Mandal, Prakasam District without due procedure established by law. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.Y.VENKATASATYAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: With regard to the family disputes relating to the immovable property, this writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Sub-Registrar, Kanigiri Town and Mandal, in registering the family settlement deed executed by the fifth respondent in favour of respondents 6 to 8 for the land belonging to the petitioner and to direct the third respondent not to interfere by supporting the unofficial respondents 6 to 8 at the instance of the fifth respondent for wrongful gains, as illegal and arbitrary. Admittedly, the petitioner has not made any grievance/representation with regard to the alleged illegal action either to the Sub-Registrar or to the Station House Officer. It is purely a civil dispute, which is to be decided by the appropriate civil Court and cannot be decided by this Court in this writ petition. Without there being any violation of any law, no writ of mandamus can be issued. The Writ Petition as filed by the petitioner is misconceived and not maintainable. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _____________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dt:10.06.2008 GJ