IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16569 of 2009 ARUN KUMAR CHAUHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that for payment of salary of the petitioner, he has been made accused for embezzlement of cable network and cash collected from the market but that is settled, reconciled and a compromise petition is filed, so petitioner’s arrest thereafter cannot be justified. I agree with the submission. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in - 2 - Muzaffarpur Town P.S.Case No. 342/2007, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI