IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.851 of 2007 Ram Bilash Chaurasia Versus Smt.Surji Devi & Ors ----------- 05. 17.11.2011 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. By the impugned order dated 20.01.2007, the learned court below has rejected the petition filed by the defendant purporting to be under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. as well as under Order 14 Rule 2 C.P.C. praying dismissal of the suit. The learned court below has heard the parties and has come to the conclusion that the grounds raised by the defendants in his petition are not sufficient for invoking the provisions either of Order 7 Rule 11 or Order 14 Rule 2 C.P.C. The defendant has mainly raised the ground that the plaintiff has not acquired any right in the suit property on the basis of his purchase. In my view, the petition filed by the defendant /petitioner in the court below was misconceived and has rightly been rejected. 2 There is no illegality or jurisdictional error in the impugned order. The revision application is, accordingly, dismissed. However, this order shall not prejudice the defence of the petitioner in the suit or his right to seek other remedy in accordance with law. Nitesh ( V. Nath, J.)