Time Ext. App. 1038 / 08 In W.P. No. 49 of 2006 (M/S) Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. G.S. Negi, Advocate present for the applicant-petitioner. Mr. Tumul Nailwal, Advocate present for respondents No. 1 to 7. This is Application M.C.C. No. 1038 of 2008, for extension of further one year to vacate the shop in dispute. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It appears that in the rent control case No. 04 of 1999, vide judgment and order dated 15.05.2001, passed by the Prescribed Authority, the application of the landlord was allowed and the petitioner (tenant) was directed to vacate the premises. Said order appears to have been affirmed vide order dated 22.12.2005, passed by I Additional District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, in Rent Control Appeal No. 08 of 2001. The petitioner (tenant) filed Writ Petition No. 49 (M/S) of 2006, before this Court, which was disposed of vide order dated 10.09.2007. By said order the writ petition was dismissed but the petitioner was allowed time of one year to vacate the shop by 10th September 2008. Now, at this stage the petitioner (tenant) prays for further extension of time of one year to vacate the shop. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court does not find any sufficient reason to further extend the time to vacate the premises as already sufficient time has been given to the petitioner. Accordingly, the M.C.C. Application No. 1038 of 2008 stands dismissed. (P.C. P., J.) 05.09.2008 HN