THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. No. 5556 of 2010 O r d e r: This C.R.P. is directed against the order dated 04.08.2010, passed by the VII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, dismissing the application in I.A. No. 225 of 2009 in O.S. No. 7 of 2008, filed by the petitioners praying to send the original sale deed No. 1550/65 to the handwriting expert for comparison of the thumb impressions of the vendors and opinion as regards it genuineness. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the order under revision. Though the petitioners contend that their ancestors, namely V. Sayanna, V. Venkaiah, V. Gandaiah and V. Sambaiah, did not execute the sale deed in question, and therefore, the Court below, as requested by them, ought to have sent the sale deed to the handwriting expert for comparison of the thumb impressions of the executants and opinion, the fact remains, the executants are not parties to the suit. The petitioners have not produced the authenticated thumb impressions of the executants, by which the thumb impressions existing on the sale deed could be compared. In the absence of any authenticated thumb impressions of the executants produced by the petitioners by which the thumb impressions existing on the sale deed could be compared, and the petitioners having not stated as to whether the executants of the sale deed are alive, the Court below by reason of the order under revision, refused to send the sale deed to the handwriting expert for comparison of the thumb impressions of the executants on the sale deed, and no fault can be found therewith. For the foregoing reasons, I find no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order under revision in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The C.R.P. is devoid of merit, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 14th December, 2010 KSR