1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)No.7766 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 N.Ahamed Biaz .. Petitioner Vs. State represented by 1. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to remove the petitioner's name from the rowdy list displayed in the notice board by the second respondent police station, viz., Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ravishankar Vallatharasu For Respondents : Mr.R.Anandha Raj Government Advocate. O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner for a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to remove the petitioner's name from the rowdy list displayed in the notice board by the second respondent police station, viz., Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. 2. Heard Mr.N.Ravishankar Vallatharasu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Anandha Raj, learned Government Advocate, who takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has made a representation on 16.02.2011 to the second respondent to remove his name from the history sheet which is displayed in the notice board of the second respondent police station. 5. The learned Government Advocate appears for the State states that the Authority will consider the representation of the petitioner in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 accordance with law and on its own merits. 6. Considering the nature of relief sought for in the writ petition, the second respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.02.2011 on its own merits and in accordance with law and as per the provisions of relevant Act. It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion about the merits of the petitioner's claim and the Authority shall dispose the representation on its own merits. 7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (crl.Side) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. +1cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No.23133 ss1 GH : 26.07.2011 : 2p/4c W.P(MD)No.7766 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 14.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/