IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11375 of 2009 MITHILESH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 04.09.2009. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 19.5.2009 contained in annexure 1 by which the agreement made between him and BIADA has been cancelled, security money have been seized and has been blacklisted. Petitioner further prays for quashing order dated 10.3.2008 by which penalty of Rs.50,000/- (Rs.25,000/- each) has been slapped on him. Petitioner states that he could not erect the boundary wall of industrial area as he was obstructed by locals who stated that it was a playground. Furthermore, there was a ditch of about 500 feet deep at the site of construction. Learned counsel for the BIADA submits that petitioner’s two bills have already been disbursed and third bill is in process, however, he did not complete the work in spite of several reminders. The writ petition is disposed of with observation that if the petitioner files representation before the Managing Director of BIADA along with a copy of this order within two weeks from today, he will dispose of the same within a period of 6 weeks thereof. Pending disposal of representation, no coercive steps would be taken for recovery of penalty imposed. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)