IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2894 of 2008 (Santosh Kumar s/o. Gulabrai Hasrani .vs. State and Ors.) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and P.B.Varale, JJ. DATE : August 21, 2007. Heard Mr. I. S. Charlewar, Adv. for Petitioner. Issue notice returnable on 18.9.2008. Mr. Yengal, Assistant Government Pleader waives notice on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 3. JUDGE JUDGE ssj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2893 of 2008 (Atmaram s/o. Dularam and anr. vs. State & Ors.) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and P.B.Varale, JJ. DATE : August 21, 2007. Heard Mr. I. S. Charlewar, Adv. for Petitioners. Issue notice returnable on 18.9.2008. Mr. Yengal, Assistant Government Pleader waives notice on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 3. JUDGE JUDGE ssj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2889 of 2008 (Madhukar s/o. Vishwasrao Shende and anr. vs. State & Ors.) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and P.B.Varale, JJ. DATE : August 21, 2007. Mr. Jichkar, Assistant Government Pleader seeks further time of two weeks to file reply. Time granted. Place the matter on 5.9.2008 for admission. JUDGE JUDGE ssj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2632 of 2008 (Santosh Dashrath Irwe and anr. vs. Jt. Director of High Education, Amravati and Ors.) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and P.B.Varale, JJ. DATE : August 21, 2007. Mr. Mujumdar, Assistant Government Pleader is given time by way of last chance to file reply. Place the matter on 5.9.2008 for admission JUDGE JUDGE ssj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2630 of 2008 (Vasant s/o. Abasaheb Deshpande .vs. State and Ors.) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and P.B.Varale, JJ. DATE : August 21, 2007. Counsel for petitioner is absent. Hence, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE JUDGE ssj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No. 750 of 2008 (Bhagwat Mahadeorao Deshmukh v. The St. of Mah. & ors.) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.S.J. Kadu holding for Mr. S.Z. Qazi Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. T.A. Mirza, APP, for Res. .... CORAM : A.H. Joshi and A.B.Chaudhari, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 27, 2009. 1. Petitioner's grievance is that the matter has not been properly investigated and complaint for this was given by him which is at page 48 to 53, the annexure VIII to the petition. We had therefore directed respondent no.2 Superintendent of Police Gondia, to file affidavit. 2. Respondent no.2 has filed affidavit, which we have perused. 3. Though the affidavit does not in very explicit language contain a statement that the complaint at annexure-VIII has been attended to, it is stated that the investigation was supervised and the same being unsatisfactory, was transferred to other officer. 4. The affidavit also discloses that the investigation is now complete and the charge-sheet has been filed, but the affidavit does not disclose the sections in relation to the offences for which charge-sheet is filed. 5. Mr.T.A. Mirza, A.P.P., states that he has perused the charge-sheet and it is for the same offences, i.e. 304-B and 498-A read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code under which the offence was registered. 6. We find that in fact when the petition was filed, the investigation was transferred to other officer. We also see that the date of filing application and date of filing charge-sheet coincides. It is thus clear that the petition was filed without proper enquiry as to if the investigation was complete. 7. Considering the affidavit, we find that the grievance of the petitioner has been dealt with and the offence has been duly enquired into. 8. In view of the above, no further orders are necessary. Writ petition disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE /TA/