1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2831 OF 2008 1.The State of Maharashtra and others. ...Petitioners vs. Dr.Sanjay Laxmanrao Sonawale. ...Respondent. --- Mr.V.A.Sonpal, A.G.P. for Petitioners. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & N.D.DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED: 4th June, 2008. P.C.:- 1. By this petition, the petitioners challenges the order dated 13.7.2004 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. Apart from unexplained delay in filing the petition, from the order we find that all that the Tribunal has done by the order is that it has directed the State Government to grant increments to the respondent ignoring technical break 2 that the respondent has given in his service. The Tribunal has not directed the regularisation of the service of the respondent. In our opinion, no exception can be taken to the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The petition is rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (N.D.DESHPANDE,J.) ---