IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH JULY 2011 / 15TH ASHADHA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 1900 of 2011() ------------------------- CC.294/2010 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, NILAMBUR .................... PETITIONERS/IST ACCUSED & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GOERGE THOMAS @ THANKACHAN,S/O.THOMAS, MALIYEKKAL HOUSE,MUNDAPETTY,VAZHIKADAVU AMSOM, NILAMBUR TALUK,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. SHEEBA GEORGE,W/O.GEORGE,ARAKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE,PARLI,EDAKKARA AMSOM,NILAMBUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS RESPONDENT/STATE:- ------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE S.I. OF POLICE,EDAKKARA THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM-31. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.I.V.PRAMOD. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.MC.No. 1900 of 2011() APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES:- A: COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CRIME NO. 192 OF 2010 OF EDAKKARA POLICE STATION. B: COPY OF THE CHARGESHEET IN CRIME NO.192 OF 2010 OF EDAKKARA POLICE STATION. C: ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 18.6.2011 SWORN BY THE SECOND PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:- NIL. ( TRUE COPY ) P.A. TO JUDGE. Kvs/- B.P. RAY, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = Crl.M.C.No.1900 of 2011. = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 6th July, 2011. O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. In this case the first petitioner is the accused and the second petitioner is the defacto complainant in Crime No.192/2010 of Edakkara Police Station for offence under Sections 323, 326, 354 and 452 read with 34 IPC corresponding to CC.No.294/2010 pending before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nilambur. It is stated that petitioner No.2 is the sister and the defacto complainant. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and has filed an affidavit in this regard. Learned Public Prosecutor states that since the parties have settled the dispute between the parties no useful purpose Crl.M.C.No.1900/2011. 2 will be served by directing them to face the trial. In that view of the matter, I direct that in the event of petitioner No.2 the defacto complainant make a statement before the learned Magistrate in the aforesaid case and the learned Magistrate is satisfied that the matter has been settled between the parties, then the learned Magistrate shall close the case. Crl.M.C. is disposed of as above. B.P. RAY, (Judge) Kvs/-