1 ao1203.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1203 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APLICATION NO. 1495 OF 2010 Jai Matadi Uttar Bhartiya Dhaba ... Appellant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents ...... Mr. A.A. Pande i/by A.R. Pande for Appellant. Mr. S.N. Gawde, AGP for the Respondent-State ...... CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 21ST OCTOBER, 2010. P. C. 1. Heard. The appellant, who filed R.C.S. No. 23 of 2010 in Court of Civil Judge, J.D. Vasai and filed application Exh.5 for temporary injunction against the Government from interfering with the possession of the plaintiff. The trial Court refused ad interim relief pending the decision of notice of motion. That order is challenged in the present appeal. 2. Admittedly, the land was acquired by the government long before 1956 and the land belongs to the Government. The defendants are not 2 ao1203.10.sxw tenants of the Government land. In view of the facts and circumstances, I see no reason to interfere with that order. Therefore, appeal stands dismissed with direction that the defendants shall file reply to the notice of motion within 4 weeks and the trial court shall hear and dispose of the application Exh.5 within 4 weeks thereafter. 3. As appeal itself is disposed of, civil application does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. J. H. BHATIA, J