# ^ IN THE H.P. STATE A0NINISTRATIVE; TSIBHNAL AT RAIPHB (N.P.) B.(i»N@. . S^^F 1S9B« t^y2(L S; ^^ 4 / o^' \^T M.K8TTY S/0 Late Sbri.E.E.MAIR, agnd ab«eiti 69 yaars.by pr«fess- iaia Betired Offiear nia Speoia^ Btjty Forest Beparfenerat .resideiife •f l-i.I.S.-l6,Tal;ibai')dh (aauseirag Board EolBny,Raipl«r(H.p.) fttt •«tt •• APPLIEANT vs St.afes Qf Madbya PffadBsli.ttaj'aiagta fehs Sserekary Farest: Befiartnenfe, Vallabh Btiawan ,Bhapa3i(H.P.) RESPONBENT APPLICATI0B UNBEB SECTIQN 19 BF ASMIBISTRATIVE TRIBBNAL AET : c ^ M v^, ^- ^ss •HiraTOT, -^gtoire. h»wi< m . Stl^T^I TC=m;3n^( ^i 'ffl?g t^ ^ \ W(RtT<h<11<=b l^j) .-?<$.) 1^.. 2.?^/oS~ f"V^ 200 •fa^g' aii^i'ronwnfet a Mohan Oh ,^ tfl -?2010 VVhen the matter was called petitioner/s ancl the matter was pass^ appears for the petitioner/s. Shri -^^--^^.Aifor t^e State. EarlierS.P.C. was issued toth^ petitioner/s Since no one appears for th] made on his/their behalf, the petition ^i^^fll *iWV\[ ^ 'f^ST <^1^1< ^Sifigtfsn^I { for hearing, none appeared for the ;d over. Even in the seoond round, none petitioner/s and no representation is s dismissed for want of proseou;on. Sd/- Manindra Mohan %rwastava Judge fTnri ""fi^f