1 P .<L it'rj%j^ c^ ,< •:';, •;•; '.:; IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT^F CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. £/^/2010(S.B.j PETITIONERS /:;1. ^\^€- ^s^ w'-^:.< \^'i ^' RESPONDENTS Krishna Kumar Shrowani, S/o Brijbhusan Singh, aged about 25 years, Caste- Dhanwar, Working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-3, Govt. Primary School, Aamaldiha, Block- Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). 2. Smt. Pramila Shrowani, W/o Krishna Kumar, aged abouf 25 years, Caste- Dhanwar, Working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-3, Govt. Primary School Kukurdikala, Block- Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : - the Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Joint Director, Schedule Caste Research and Training Institute, .Raipur (C.G.). ^/3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G,). :.!u./N':l •;:j,j; j; :Ei JJ':J i^iM: Vsh'- ^4. The Caste Scrutiny Committee, Pandit Ravishanker Vishvavidyalaya Parisar Raipur, Distt.-Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA iM-i-^is^.^.L^ij^j -HC—78 +lMCrtl th*lich T^T V<11<L1M^, ^tll<H41<o, [^<y11<wl^< ..U:.P:..L^..C^:..&x.5^fe ^4 200 3^T '<^RT (TiG^3S^T) ^?? ^T f<vii<^ ^T8H 3rTT^T 9b*4i<^ '^TTWTrf^T ^IT^T SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICg 26.10.2010 Shri Rishi Rahyl Soni, couns^ Shri Vivek Sharma, P.L, for tt Grievance of the petitioners though the caste certificates ha\| petitioners on 26.7,07 (Annexure Tahsildar, but they are not being a^ submits that direction may be iss^ Scrutiny Committee to verify the c^ the petitioners and to pass approprij State counsel submits that approach the resp. No.4 a.nd in turr| pass a.ppropriate orders after due stipulated time. Accordingly, the petitioners No.4 and to obtain appropriate for^ respondent No.4 is expected to deci| preferably within a period of six mo| the said form.. Meanwhile, respondents ar^ services of the petitioners till the resp. No.4. It is made clear that this on m.erits of the case and the to decide the same strictly in accorc| cr)i^f<n<fll tR^if ^* f^T^if Tf^R?K ^3^RR3?n^5T PRITINKBRDIWAKER ^l for the petitioners. te State. in the present petition are thai te been issued in favour of the ^/2) 85 18.6.07 by the Additional |;cepted by the respondent No.3. He |ed to the resp. No.4 i.e. the Caste iste certificates issued in favour of b-te orders. ^he petitioners may be directed to the respondent No.4 be direcfced to lyerification of the facts within the ^.re directed to approa.ch the resp. |n and on submitting the same the |le the same in accordance with law bths from the date of submission of directed not to terminate the Ipassing of suitable order by the Coijirt has not expressed any opinion authc|rity concerned would be at liberty [ance with law. —— Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge