Criminal Misc. No. M-29255 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-29255 of 2009 Date of decision : 20.07.2010 Mohinder Singh & another ....Petitioners V/s State of Punjab & others ....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Vikas Bali, Advocate for respondents No. 3 & 5. Mr. Sanjiv Pandey, Advocate for respondents No. 6,7,9,10 & 11. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. wherein a direction has been sought to protect life & liberty of the petitioners as they apprehend danger at the hands of respondents No. 5 to 12. It has further prayed that respondents No. 5 to 12 are trying to take forcible possession of property of the petitioners despite a stay order in their favour. Another prayer made in the petition is for registration of case against respondents No. 5 to 12 under appropriate Section of IPC for assaulting petitioners and their family members. Learned State counsel submits that all the allegations levelled by the petitioners have been found to be false in an inquiry conducted by the police. Learned counsel has referred to affidavit of Diljinder Singh Dhillon, Criminal Misc. No. M-29255 of 2009 2 Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Shahkot, District Jalandhar and submits that during inquiry it was found that fire broke out all of sudden and wheat crop of petitioners as well as of certain neighbours was burnt. He has further submitted that petitioner is in the habit of moving false complaints in view of civil dispute pending between the parties and to put pressure on opposite party. Heard. In view of the stand taken by the State that allegations levelled in the complaint are false, no direction needs to be issued for registration of the FIR. As regards prayer that respondents No. 5 to 12 be restrained from interfering in the peaceful possession of the petitioners, the said prayer is mis-conceived. No such direction can be issued by this court in exercise of inherent jurisdiction of this court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The petition is not only frivolous but totally mis-conceived. The same is hereby dismissed with Rs. 2,000/- as costs to be paid to State Legal Services Authority, Punjab. July 20, 2010 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE