IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 23RD APRIL 2010 / 3RD VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 10082 of 2010(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.K.SURESH KUMAR, KALEELAZHIKATHU HOUSE, CHERUPOIKA P.O. (VIA) PUTHOOR, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.VIMALAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. INDUSIND BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, VARINJAM TOWER, RESIDENCY ROAD, KOLLAM - 691 001. 2. JAYAKUMAR.R., PROPRIETOR, M/S.A.J.ENTERPRISES, JAYAVILASOM CHETHADAY, CHENGAMANADU P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. 4. AUTHORISATION OFFICER, INDUSIND BANK LTD., VARINJAM TOWER, RESIDENCY ROAD, KOLLAM - 691 001. ADV. SRI.SATHISH NINAN FOR R1, & 4 BY G.P.SRI.ARAVINDA KUMAR BABU.T.K. FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ---------------------------- W.P.(C)No.10082 of 2010 ---------------------------- Dated 23rd April, 2010 JUDGMENT Sri.N.Vimalan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to the petitioner's contentions and reserving liberty with him to challenge Ext.P3 possession notice issued under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 in other appropriate proceedings. The learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent does not oppose the said request. In the light of the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn leaving open the petitioner's contentions and reserving liberty with him to challenge Ext.P3 in other appropriate proceedings. P.N.RAVINDRAN Judge TKS