IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12428 of 2008 --- SUNDAR DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 2.5.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No.551/o7 under sections 307/326/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on perusal of the First Information Report, as contained in Annexure 1, it would appear that the First Information Report was lodged by the elder brother of the husband of this petitioner. The allegations, which have been levelled against this petitioner, are that she along with one Chandra Kishore Rai and Jawahar Rai had made an attempt to kill the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations are absolutely vague. However, the case was lodged on account of misunderstanding, which would appear from perusal of the petition of Rajkumar Yadav that he had no grievance against this petitioner 2 and others nor there was any enmity nor he had brought anything against them. The petitioner submits that in view of the above, she aged about 40 years deserves to be granted anticipatory bail. Upon considering the submissions of the parties and on perusal of the allegations made in the First Information Report as well as the petition filed by the informant, as contained in Annexure 2, I direct that the petitioner Sundar Devi, in the event of her arrest or surrender, be enlarged on bail on her furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No.551/07 on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)