IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No: 17238 of 2001 Between: Ramkote Satyanarayana S/o R.Anthaiah R/o 4-2-925, Ramkote, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Secretary of Government, Revenue Department Government of Andhra Pradesh, Sercretariate, Hyderabad. 2 The Collector of R.R.District, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 3 M.R.O. of Uppal Mandal, R.R.District, Uppal, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to implement the orders of the Government issused G.O.Ms.No.508 Rev. dt: 20.10.95 and G.O.Ms.No.972 Rev.dt: 4.12.99 and this petitioner of the land consented for regularisation of title in respect of the land admeasuring 0.15 gunts bearing Sy.No.506 of Uppal Bhagat Village, R.R.District vide his letter latest being the letter dt: 16.3.1999 and further declare that the action of the respondents for not implemanting the orders as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.S.PRAKASH RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: Though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither is the counsel for petitioner present nor is there any representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ______________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J. 27th January 2009 CVRK