IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14593 of 2008 CHHOTU MIAN @ MUMTAZE & RAMA SHANKAR PD. GUPTA @ RAMASHANKAR GUPTA @ MANTU GUPTA @ MANTU PRASAD GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 07-05-2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and also learned APP on behalf of the State. The petitioners are accused in a case u/s 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioners are neither named in the FIR nor any recovery has been made from their possession. They have also not been put in T.I. Parade. He submitted that learned Sessions Judge in the impugned order has wrongly observed that looted mobile phone was found in the possession of petitioner Ramashankar Gupta. He submitted that this is an error of record. It appears that petitioners are in custody since 20.12.07. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Magistrate, Patna in Danapur GRPS case no. 7/07. BKS/ (M. Saran, J.)