o‘hwb E§ “4E %§E%§=§ £®$RT $§ §€§§E€A¥§§RE AT £E§A§§€J§ {$.54 WRET PETE"?IGN,N0. QF 2mm m 5'3 BEWEEN 3&sant Yaaiav 5,1:3 Late Tuisiram Vadasi, aged abuut 34 yaaé's, RIG Ramayan Chowk, Chateaciiahx, B§laspuri Tehgii 81 District: Bi§a§§jur {CGJ %E§E?E%%EE AND :ha ‘7 ate of Chhattgsgarri “down me Ebcregwy Daparfmem 0f Ca cg; Eve Sccée‘cms bhhattisgai"? r‘ K 5 amdirg, Rama? {C l“ 3 The R g!strar, Co oneratwe Sametwg Chhattxcgarh Near Agricui’cure CoLeqe Lanmmg Ramur ”3:13” aw ui3%i°§ci: Raxpur (C (a ) I k e? Fwecwwe affwéi (gaya! aaag‘a ) \zila $ahakar' Kandn Ear‘k Maryadlt Bhaspw Temii 8t Dlgfritt Buasaur (C G ) ear Ma’wu Chewx, N %E§¥@%§$?é?§ JQ vyaw£§§?‘ @E?E?fi§?§ iff¥£§§£ AEEEEE ?§j23? i§§ &§§%$?§!i§?f§i€ i§¥§§£ Wk g N a " XI-HC~~78 WWW V9.13: 3W§§$ K 2m L} maxim wm‘ww Whmw‘w&wtw $WW Shri Shailendra Soni learned c unsel fur the petitioner. Shri Sandeep Dubey, ! med Panel‘ Lawyer, for the State/respondent No.1, on advance c py. Heard on l.A. No.7323 of 20 ’ which is an application for urgent hearing. The matter is taken up on B ard. Hence, LA. No,7323 of 2004 stands disposed of, 17/01/2005: - Heard on the question of admi sion of this writ petition. Learned counsel appearing f0 the petitioner submits thatthe father of the petitioner namely late Tulsira Yadav who was working as a Clerk in Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Ma adit, Bilaspur (Office of respondent No.3), died on 02/02/2004 during theécourse of his employment. Learned counsel further submits that after thie death of his father, the petitioner applied for compassionate,appointment in place of his father. Annexure- PM filed along with this petition is thé copy of the application submitted by the petitioner. Learned counsel submfits that even after submitting the said application on 23/03/2004, no r sponse has been given by the department. Learned counsel make a limited prayer that the authorities of the department may be directed to dispose of the case of the petitioner in accordance with law within a stipul ted period. The prayer seems to be gen ine and the same is allowed. It is, therefore, directed that the authoritie of the department shall trace out the application of the petitioner vide An exure-P/ty‘and thereafter they shayl // / / / XI-HC 78 3E “2W e1 ,m, W3? UU r X" 3mm WWE? W EQQ q mW (Wm .mf j W ufg'a swim “a- W Ema? 1‘17 F§$ "d w; ala'%wW § §5 W W 3 dispose of the in accordance with law within a period of fourmwwka 7m on’rhj same from the date of filing of this order along with the copy of the petition. With the above observations, the petition stands disposed om/nilly 7" sm- Sinha , J sunil Kumar Judge