1 g g ^A. S-sS^O-HE—TS sn^T ^i R-ii* ^TT STT^TgRTlNT ^ 's^ ^wwi, ®tfly'i6,(s|<riiy>j,'!. IIMCTI th*iitt> W^ 200 sn^r'^v (ljcif^«i<{]Ei) ?wiw ^ito sii^i (Sirate Bench: Hon'yto Mr. Justice Dhhwidra Mistra) W.P, Petitioner '^I^CT^t 'RW^iy ^f fe^t' Tf^R$R ^sifiiiTan^T (sl No.5301/2008 Vs. Resoandents (Petition U/A ^26 of Constilution of Indw) biti^ Kumor Checham, 5/o Lote Shri Dorixri Ran), aged about 29 years, R/o 6nim Khudia, Tah^ & bistrict Bilospur (C6). 1. Stote of Chhofrt'i^orh, Through the Secretary, Water Resources t>eportment, I O.K.S. Bhawon, Raipur (C6). 2. | Chief Engineer, Water Resources Oeparhnent, Bitaspur (C6). 3.|Executive Byineer, Wat-er Resoirces Oeparftnent, .Mungeli. District Bilaspur |(C6). 4.1 Sub Divisional Officer, Water Resources beportment, Lormi bivision, Mwgeli Oistrict Bilaspu- (C6). Present: Mr. Ali Asgar, Advocate for tti Mrs. SmitaShai, Ponel Lawyer e petitioner. for respondents. 22.9.2008 Heard. Srievtmce of the petit^oner is thot his father Lat-e t><trbari Rcm, who wcs employed as permanerrt'g^ngman ih the Wat'er Resoin''ces bepart'ment of the Stote Sovemment under Irespondent No.4-Sub C)ivisi<mal Officer, Lormi Bivisibn, Mungeli, District BitaspUr, aiea on 3lA.(/UUd durlHfl hld &n>ployment. ^BSE'-ssa, ,.f.^tSS!,. !f,oXI-HG—78 3ii^i ^r'f^'fh; wian^rg^h? L- 9\ S~~!SiiSS,— ^ ^ '3ST -^ww^, "3'tj1^|<o, f<<diyy *II*ICTI thnrai Sf^V XT^i' (^pf^^lET) WW^ltoSD^T -^ "Wl 200 ^raferih'TTOif Tf ft^t ^ngir ^sifinsn^i The petitioner applied for conjipassionafe appointment in the prescribed for'fflfft' immediotely aft-er the deoth of his father on 16.6.2003 vide Annexure P-2. However, he <4als not grantsd compasdonate oppointment though he is entitled as per fhe scheme of tte Storte Sowrnment for compassionote appointment. Hisj representotlon has also not been considered and decided by the respondent (juthorH-ies. Learned counsel for the |petitioner aibmits tha* this petition moy be disposed of wtth liberty to th^ petitioner to make a fresh representation before the respondent No.2 f<^r considering the case of the petitioner for compasslonQfe appointment, w^iich may. be decided by respondent no.2 in accordance wrt'h law. Leamed counsel for the respondents has noit objection if the petition is disposed of in the oforesaid ferms. In view of the above a|bmissions of leamed counset for the part-ies, the petition is dtsposed of jwith liberty to the petitiwier to appty for compassionote appomtment afijedi before the respondent No.2 cnd the same may be decided expeditiously, |)refembly within a perlod of six weeks. Certified copy as per nfes. Sd/- ': iMistoa }udge