IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.14796 of 2009 1. NEHAL ALAM @ MD. NEHAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR WITH Cr. Misc. No. 13610 of 2009 2. MD.AZHAR IMAM @ BABLOO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR WITH Cr. Misc. No. 24771 of 2009 3. TASLIM @ SAMIM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 10.07.2009 Since above three bail applications have arisen out of one occurrence i.e. Terhagachh P.S. Case No. 91 of 2008, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners are accused in a case which has been registered under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that their names have figured either on confessional statement or on their own confession. It is further submitted that they have not been put on Test Identification Parade. It is submitted that Nehal Alam @ Md. Nehal and Md. Azhar Imam @ Babloo do not have any criminal antecedent prior to the institution of this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though petitioner Taslim @ Shamim has criminal antecedent but the case is of the year 2001-2002. In the facts and circumstances of the case, namely, petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are directed to be released on bail on furnishing 2 bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Terhagachh Town P.S. Case No. 91 of 2008. Prayer for bail of petitioner no. 3 Taslim @ Shamim is rejected for the present. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after five months. Kundan (S. P. Singh, J.)