g!e Bench: Hon'bie Shri H.L. uattu, Cj. ContemptPefltjon HQ/f07of2QQ7 G.P. Kakoria S/o Shri Ra.mdas Kakoria, aged about 57 years, occupation Sub Dlvisional ' Offioer, Pubiio Works Department, Sub Division Mawahi, District BilaspurC.G. Vs. G.P. Thapak, Executive Engineer, Pub!ic Works DsDSf^msnt. Dlvls'on Pendf^. District Bilaspur C.G. Contempt.PetitiQn under Articte 215 the Constitution_oflndia .reacl.wjtb Section 12 of the ContempLofCoyit Apti Present: Shri Rakesh Pana'ey, counsei for the petitioner. (Passedon23 April, This Court by its order dated 21.03.2007 had directed the . respondenis for maintenance of status quo in respeot of posting of the petitioner. • : (2) The complainant a'teges that the respondent has not permitted , him to repori: for duty in the original place where he was working. ! (3) Along with the oontempt petition, the petitioner has Rot produced any materials where the respondent has refused to permitithe petitioner to report for duty. In the absence of relevant materia! documents, it cannot be possible for this Court to come to the conclusion that :,S!ie respondent has committed any disobedience of the orders and directiocis issued bythisCourt. . (4) In vieytf of the above, I" decline to entertain this contecipt pefition. Acoordingiy, it is rejected. Orderedacoordingly. Sd<- ,, Cb^5us6