NGiE BE^I^ ^ ^ ^r^t^^ ^SfSS IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. t W.P . N0 ?ite3 /2005 PETITIONER ^- ,..<i^ Mohd. Adil S/o Mohd. Idu ^••^g^ '" ~." ~.~"\ "^ ^.^'^K->"'^ a9ed about 36 years R/o ^v^-^'-^.-;;"",....••••" ^^" ..r"- Golbazar Rajnanadgaon (C.G.) ?<* Aa' VERSUS RESPONDENTS^^ ,1)- Regional Transport Authority C.G. at Raipur. ^^^.^ ^ ^W\^^ 2) Abdul Rahman.Siddiqui S/o not known Bus operator Gaurinagar Rajnandgaon 3) State of C.G. Through Secretary Trasport Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur. /" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. XI-HC-22 3ST?-i l-4icl4, .3>o®S 5~ 3^?rqiT '3TI^?T giiiWCTSta' ts.wss'g' 15-7-2005 Mr. B.K. Rawat, counsel for the] petitioner. Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, (^ovt. Advocate for the State/respondents No.1 &3. l-1eard both the counsel on adnriissjon. The petitioner has preferred. Constitution of India, questioning thjp order dated 10-11-2004 passaj by the Regional Transport Authority, whereby from Kawardha to Rajnandgaon. The main grievanoe of the petil before the State Transport Appellate T| petitioner, therefore, he is entitled to fill before this Court and ncw, the Presidl the STAT assigning reason that the Therefore, the STAT should consider t{ie sald application sympathetioally. With the aforesaid observation +liltd41-1 TOIcf)'' iv fs^Zl vfsKZK ^iari^iTsn^r |this wrtt petition under Article 226 of the permit has been granted to respondent No.2 (ioner is that wrthout formation of the route by the State Government, respondent N|o.1 has granted pennit to respondent No.2, which is contrary to the provisions of t^e Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The said order is appealable, ttterefore, the petitioner is ertitted to file appeal t-ibunal. Alternative remedy is available to the ^ appeal before the State Transport Appellate. Trtbunal. Learned counsel fot the petitior(er submits that asthe Presiding Officer ofthe STAT was not posted, therefore, per fijiree, the petitioner has to file this writ petition [\g Officer has been postKl, hence, benefit of limitationbe directed to be granted to tjie petitioner. The petitioner is entitled to fil^ appllcation for condonation of delay before 'residing Officer was not posted previously. |and direction, the petition stands disposed of, at the admission stage itself. Consequertly, M.(W.)P.No.25|5GOQ5 and I.A.No.5872/2005 also stand disposedof. | Parties are entitled for certified lcopy of this order. - -^ ;T T L.C^ado° srtUi