1 mmj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN ITS CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6245 OF 2009 Madhukar Nandu Salve & Anr. ..Petitioners Vs. The Tahsildar, Village Natpute, Tal Malshiras, District Solapur & Ors. ..Respondents Shri Kishor S. Patil for the Petitioner Smt. S.S.Bhende AGP for State Coram: P.B.MAJMUDAR AND R.M. SAVANT, JJ. 16 th June, 2010 P.C. 1. The only grievance in the above Petition is that an entry has been effected in the revenue records vide Mutation Entry No.1022 in the other right column that the land in question bearing Gut No.664 ad measuring 1 Hector 2 Ares has been acquired for extension of the gaothan. It is the case of the Petitioners that the land in question has been released from acquisition vide order passed under Section 48(1)of the Land Acquisition 2 Act, 1894. If that be so, the Petitioners would produce a copy of the said order passed under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, before the Collector, Solapur, within a period of three weeks from date. If the said order is produced by the Petitioners along with their representation before the Collector within the aforesaid time, the Collector would dispose of the said representation within a period of 6 weeks thereafter. If, no such order produced, the benefit of this order would not ennure to the Petitioner and the authorities would thereafter be entitled to proceed in due course, as regards the grievance of the Petitioner. 2. In the light of the above, nothing further survives for consideration in the Petition, the Petition to accordingly stand disposed of. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)