1 W.P. NO.6549/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6549 OF 2010 Dhanraj s/o Shankarrao Patil ... PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri S.V. Warad, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.G. Shelke, A.G.P. for R.No.1. Shri S.S. Choudhari, Advocate for R.No.2 & 3 ..... CORAM : A.A. SAYED, J. DATE : 22nd December, 2010 PER COURT : 1. After having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I find that, certain pleas which ought to have been taken by the petitioner in the appeal are not taken, and in particular in respect of the qualification required for the post on which the petitioner was working. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there are similarly circumstanced Assistant Teachers in the institution, who are teaching 11th and 12th Standards, who are only graduates. 2. In that view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to remand the matter back to the School Tribunal, with liberty to the petitioner to amend the appeal in light of what is stated above. If such amendment application is filed, the same shall be allowed by the Tribunal. After the 2 W.P. NO.6549/2010 amendment is carried out, the respondent institution shall be entitled to file additional written statement/ reply and the appeal shall be decided in accordance with law within a period of one year from today. 3. With the aforesaid directions, Writ Petition is disposed of. A. A. SAYED JUDGE fmp/wp6549.10