1 S.788.83.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 788 OF 1983 Dr. Sadanand Nadkarni (Since deceased) by his heirs and legal representative 1A. Dr. (Mrs.) Vimal Sadanand Nadkarni. & Ors. ... Plaintiffs. V/s. Gajanant P. Nadkarni. ... Defendant. And F.A. Infrastructure Ltd. & Ors. ... Confirming Parties. Mr. D.J. Menezes for the Plaintiffs. Mr. D.H. Mehta a/w. Pankaj Thatte i/b. M/s. Thatte & Co. for the Defendant. Mr. Rushabh Shah with Ms. S. Bansal i/b. Raval Shah for Confirming Parties 1 to 4. Ms. S. Joshi – Dongre for Confirming Parties Nos. 6 to 8D. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 30th AUGUST 2010. P.C. :- Consent Terms dated today, i.e. 30th August 2010 signed by all the parties to the Suit and their respective Advocates are tendered in the Court. All parties to the Suit are present in the Court. Learned Counsels on both sides state that respective parties have signed the Consent Terms in their respective presence. 2. Learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs prays for amendment in terms of clause 1 of the aforesaid Consent terms. In view of 2 S.788.83.sxw the request, amendment is permitted to be carried out as set out in clause 1 of the Consent terms to show Confirming parties as the Defendants. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Re-declaration is dispensed with. 3. Again called out after the amendment is carried out. 4. Consent Terms as above are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. There shall be a decree in terms of the Consent Terms with no order as to costs. Refund of Court fees granted as per rules. Undertakings mentioned in clauses 6,9,11 and 13 are accepted. 5. Notice of Motion No. 893 of 2010 is disposed of with no orders in view of the decree in the Suit. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. Parties are permitted to act on the basis of a copy of Consent terms duly authenticated by Associate of the Court as true copy. (R.Y. GANOO, J.)