IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.834 of 2007 MISHRI PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 15.9.2008. This application has been filed against the order of acquittal dated 29.5.2007 passed by Sri Ranjit Kumar Singh, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Danapur in Complaint Case No. 236(C2)/96, Trial No. 403/07. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the court below has not properly considered the oral as well as documentary evidence and has wrongly acquitted the opposite parties. However, on perusal of the impugned order it appears that court below has rightly acquitted the opposite parties as the record of proceeding under Section 144 Cr.P.C. was not brought on the record nor the service of notice of the proceeding was proved. It further appears from the impugned order that the proceeding under Section 144 Cr.P.C. was dropped on 7.2.1996 whereas the date of - 2 - alleged occurrence was 21.2.1996. Under the facts and circumstances, it is quite clear that the court below has rightly acquitted the opposite parties and I find no material to interfere in the impugned order. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)