1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA. C.W.P(T) No.14841 of 2008 Date of Decision: 21.12.2011 Madan Lal S/o shri. Nand Lal, R/o village Guraur, P.O Soldha, Tehsil Sadar, District Bilaspur (H.P.). .. Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Himachal Pradesh through Pr. Secretary (Education) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-171001. 2. The Director of Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla- 171001, 3. The Parent-Teacher Association, through its President, Govt. Sr. Sec. School, Soldha, Tehsil Sadar, District Bilaspur (HP)(ex-parte vide order 9.8.2007). 4. The principal, Govt. Sr. Sec. School, Soldha, Tehsil Sadar, District Bilaspur (HP) ..Respondents. Application under Section 19 of the H.P Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Sunita Sharma,Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. R.M Bisht, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State. Sanjay Karol, J. (Oral). Learned Deputy Advocate General has invited my attention to the decision rendered by the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 full Bench of this Court in CWP No. 1310 of 2009 titled as Manju Bala Vs. State. 2. It is not in dispute that petitioner was working as P.T.A in Government Sr. Secondary School, Soldha, Tehsil Sadar, District Bilaspur, H.P. According to the petitioner, new Principal did not allow him to mark his presence inspite of his selection by the Parent Teacher Association, whereas according to the State petitioner stood removed by a resolution passed by the Parent Teacher Association itself. Now these are factual aspects, which need to be looked into by respondent No.2. As such, present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the matter and take a decision with regard to petitioner’s grievance, in accordance with law. Needfull shall positively be done within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Needless to add, all concerned shall be afforded opportunity of hearing before any such decision is taken. (Sanjay Karol),Judge. December 21,2011 (Priti)