u i^.. J^ ^ '"s': •' ^t-;,: • -S^Q INTHE HIGH CQURT OFJUDICATURE AT.BILASPUR (CG.) M.C.C. N0. ^ffj OE2Q11 ®ln8I (ARISING QUT OF W. P..NO. 968 OF 2001) AN APPLICATION FOR RESTORATIQN OF WRIT PETITION N0. 968 OF. 2001 - "DIGREELAL AND.QTHERS VS. STATE OF GHHATTISGARH & OTHERS", DISMISSED'.IN DEFAULT ON .08/03/2010.. BYHQN.'BLE SINGLEJUDGE .,'..<, ^ •.,:.c , .. AFPLICANTS ^ >'^3'^<- •? •^ ^-' " ,.!?>l- _.'a\ ^l/'"^ :f?;' 1.- .'Digreelal, Son ofTukaram Patel, Aged about 43 years, Thahtrain, Son ofB.ihagatram Patel, Aged about 70 years, Babulal, son. ofTbah.tram Patel, , Agedabout40yea.rs, • Bhawani Shankar Choudhary, son of Samser Singh Choudhary, &.-• '' Btiawani:. Sh.aj'i.kar Bhoi, Son' of Lalit ,.,BIioi,'ag®d.ab8ut58:years, •;; 6.; Parmanahd BKoi, Son :6f ^Lalif Bhoi, aged about55years,! ' All residents of village Padigaon, Tahsil 8s District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) (Note - SinceJ.heappUcant no. 2 Tukaram and the applicant no 8 Janakram Patel hdve expired, therefore, their names are not men.tioned).. NON.APPLICANTS ^> '^ 'f' VERSUS : 1. State ofChhattisgarh, • Through .Secretary, •f^ . Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhaftisgarh), 2. The Commissioner (Revenue), : Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). 3. The Collector, : : Raigarh,(C.bhattisgarh'). 4. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenuej, Raiga.rhjChhattisgarh), ' '; XI-HC—78 311^1 Vf R;-f TW an^r sdt4f4> •^' (01 '3~5^ •^I^IICrt'M, aTily'iS, f^t11-9^< ..n£.^,....m/.}L Mlildl ,(,qjt(, ' ~~ - • • r -^^QQ^ sn^t Tra?? (Tpf35i^E() 'reiiw'BJCT 3i)^i S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashstnt Kumar Mishra 15.12.2011. Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, oouitsel for the applioants. Heard learned counsel for th <M<lf^^-T ^ffl^tf ^ ^S^ ^.pif'^.R iTsiRmsn^'it aoolioants on I.A. No.1 for oondonation of delav. On due consideration, I.A. No. 1 is altowed. Delay in filing the appticationlis condoned. Heard leamed counset forth^ appltoants. This is an application for r^storation of Writ Petition No. ^8/2001 which was dismissed for want of prdsecution bythis Court on 08/03/2010. The reasons assigned Tor cjefautt in appearance is considered and found to be sufficient. Accordingly, the M.C.C. is al|owed. Writ Petition No. 968/2001 i^ restored to its original number. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge