COPC No.102 of 2009. 13.6.2011 Present: Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate, for the respondent. Heard. It has been submitted by Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, Advocate, that in reference to order passed by this Court from time to time in this Contempt Petition, the then Regional Director of Northern Regional Committee of National Council for Teacher Education was ordered to visit the institution of the petitioner, it appears the visiting team has submitted a report and in terms of that report, appropriate committee has taken the decision rejecting the claim of the petitioner. However, such report as well as the decision rejecting the claim of the petitioner is not on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that report as well as the decision may be ordered to be brought on record. In our considered view, no useful purpose would be served to allow the proceedings of the present contempt petition to go on. In these circumstances, the petitioner is not pressing this contempt petition, however, the prayer is being made, to give liberty to the petitioner, to challenge the report and decision regarding rejection before appropriate forum by way of appropriate remedy. It is directed that the inspection report and decision taken in that respect for and on behalf of the respondents/authorities have to be furnished to the :: 2 :: petitioner within three weeks. However, liberty is open to the petitioner, if so, advised, to challenge the decision of rejection of the claim of the petitioner before appropriate forum. The contempt petition is disposed of with above directions, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. ( R.B. Misra ), Judge. ( V.K. Sharma ), Judge. June 13, 2011 cs