IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 14TH MARCH 2011 / 23RD PHALGUNA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 207 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.28969/2010 Dated 15/10/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. V.H.SUBAIR, AGED 33, S/O.HASSAN, VATTAKUDIYIL HOUSE, NJAYAPPILLY P.O., KOTHAMANGALAM. 2. K.V.VIJAYAN, AGED 45, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, KUMBALAKUDIYIL, NJAYAPPILLY P.O., THATTEKKAD, KOTHAMANGALAM. BY ADV. SRI.SIBY MATHEW SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU SRI.B.PREMNATH (E) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- MUHAMMED ANWAR, AGED ABOUT 30, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, ASSISTANT WILD LIFE WARDEN, BIRDS SANCTUARY, THATTEKKAD P.O., PIN-686 691. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== Contempt Case (C).No. 207 of 2011 ================== Dated this the 14th day of March, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioners complain of non-compliance with the direction in Annexure A1 judgment in W.P.(C). No. 28969/2010. In that judgment I directed the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5. The respondent has filed an affidavit producing an order, which, according to the respondent, is the order passed pursuant to the judgment. In the above circumstances, without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to take further proceedings pursuant to the order now passed, this contempt case is closed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge