IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9138 of 2010 1. MD. ABDUL RAZAK 2. Sabila Khatoon 3. Masira Khatoon Versus 1. The STATE OF BIHAR 2. Shahjadi Khatoon ------ 2/ 16.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Dowry if was demanded within 3-4 years of the marriage, thereafter husband left for Saudi Arabia and next part of the allegation came in existence about his marrying with petitioner no.3. So, the main grievance remained continuing for marrying with petitioner no.3. Complainant remained all along to her parents’ house after 3-4 years of the marriage. When dowry was demanded she was ousted may not justify refusal of anticipatory bail to Sautan and mother-in-law and father-in-law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. C226 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)