1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.A.(MD).No.901 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 Ramesh : Appellant Vs. 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 4.The District Employment Officer, District Employment Office, Ramanathapuram District. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 05.08.2011 made in W.P.(MD). No.8801 of 2011 on the file of this Court. Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 1.8.2011 and direct the respondents to consider him for the appointmennt of the posting Village Assistant. For Appellant : Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah JUDGMENT ************* [Judgment of the Court was delivered BY P.JYOTHIMANI, J] This Writ Appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 05.08.2011 made in W.P.(MD).No.8801 of 2011. 2. On the face of it, we do not see any reason to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge. In our considered view, the learned Single Judge has correctly held that having https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 given a representation on 01.08.2011, the appellant has filed the Writ Petition on 02.08.2011 seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation and in the absence of any statutory duty cast on the other side, the learned Single Judge has dismissed the said Writ Petition. 3. In such view of the matter, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed. The learned counsel for the appellant requests this Court that the cost imposed by the learned Single Judge may be deleted. In view of the said submission made, the portion of the order of the learned Single Judge imposing costs of Rs.2,000/- [Rupees Two Thousand] is ordered to be deleted. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 4.The District Employment Officer, District Employment Office, Ramanathapuram District. +One cC to The Spl Govt. Pleader, SR.No.32419 NB rl/6c – 10.10.2011 JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A.(MD).No.901 of 2011 20.09.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/