IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23101 of 2009 JITU PASWAN @ JITENDRA PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.07.2009 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is the husband apprehending arrest in a complaint case under Sections 498A and 494 of the Penal Code. The impugned order notices that his prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected in 2003 and attained finality. There is no occasion to consider any prayer for anticipatory bail. The same is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merit including the contention of the petitioner that i9n the meantime there has been compromise between the parties without being prejudiced by the present order. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)