IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 29TH AUGUST 2008 / 7TH BHADRA 1930 Crl.MC.No. 336 of 2006() ------------------------ MC.51/2005 of SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, KASARGOD, KANHANGAD .................... PETITIONER: ACCUSED: -------------------- 1. C.T. ABDUL KHADER, S/O. C.T. ABDULLA, KALLUVALAPPIL (H), CHEMNAD VILLAGE. 2. P.K. THAHA, S/O. P.KHALID, VADAKKUMBATH, CHEMNAD VILLAGE. 3. FASALU A.M. @ UGANDA FASALU, S/O. MOHAMMED ALI, KOMBANAD, CHEMNAD VILLAGE. 4. K.A. MUHAMMED RAFEEQU @ MURAD RAFEEQU, S/O. K.M. MUHAMMED, PULLIKUNNU KASABA VILLAGE. 5. ABID P., S/O. MOHAMMED, PULLIKUNNU KASABA VILLAGE. 6. MUHAMMED KUNHI, S/O. ABDUL KHADER, CHEMNAD VILLAGE. 7. ABBAS ALI, S/O. AHAMMED, KUNNARIYATH, CHEMNAD VILLAGE. 8. MUNSHAD, S/O. MOHAMMED KUNHI, CHEMNAD VILLAGE. 9. C.H. REFEEQUE @ AAPPU, S/O. HASAINAR, VADAKKUMBATH, CHEMNAD VILLAGE. 10. HASINEAR C.K. @ POTH HASINAR, S/O. ABDULKADHER, KOMBANADKAM, CHEMNAD VILLAGE. 11. MOHAMMED FAISEL PALOTH @ VANDIMASH, S/O. ABDUL RASHEED PALOTH, CHEMNAD VILLAGE. 12. ABDUL RAHMAN AKARI, S/O. ABDUL KHADER, VADUKUMBATH, CHEMNAD VILLAGE. Crl.MC.No. 336 of 2006 -2- 13. ANSARI @ S.I. ABU, S/O. MAMMU, MOOLAYIL (H). 14. AHAMMED SHEBEEN N.A., S/O. ABOOBACKER, CHEKKARAMKOD, CHEMNAD VILLAGE. 15. MUHAMMED NASEEM, S/O. MOHAMMED AKBER, KOMBANADKAM, CHEMNAD VILLAGE. 16. ABDUL RAHMAN UMAIR S/O. UMMAR, CHEMNAD VILLAGE. 17. ABDUL NASAR, S/O. ABOOBACKER, CHOWKI, PERIYADKAM, KUDLU VILLAGE. 18. RAHMATHU, S/O. HANEEF, AYICHERI (H), KOMBANADKAM, CHEMNAD VILLAGE. 19. SHAHIB K., S/O. MAMMU, CHEKKARAMKODU, CHEMNAD VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON SMT.GOVINDU P.RENUKADEVI RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT: ------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY S.I. OF POLICE, KASARAGOD, REP. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, KERALA HIGH COURT, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.PUZHAKKARA MOHAMMED THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- Crl.M.C.336/2006 -------------------- Dated this the 29th day of August, 2008 ORDER The petitioners challenge the proceedings in M.C.51/2005 on the files of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kasargod at Kanhangad, initiated under Section 107 read with Section 111 of Cr.P.C. On a perusal of Annexure-A1, it can be seen that the Sub Divisional Magistrate has only issued a notice of show cause requiring the petitioners to show cause why they should not be ordered under Section 107 of Cr.P.C to execute a bond for an amount of Rs.10,000/- or such like sum. Obviously it is for the petitioners to appear before the Sub Divisional Magistrate and show cause. Petitioners had no cause of action at this stage nor they really a grievance as such. I am of the view that Crl.M.C is misconceived at this stage. Accordingly the same is dismissed. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs