IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.119 of 2009 SMT.NANDANI KUMER Versus SUNDESHWER THAKUR ----------- 02 23.01.2009 Heard Mr. Mukesh Kumar No.3, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 25.11.2008 passed in Misc. Case No. 1 of 1998 by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Samastipur, whereby her petition in a proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for grant of maintenance has been dismissed. In Raj Kumar Sah Vrs. The State of Bihar & Anr. Reported in 2008 (4) PLJR 817, a Division Bench of this Court, of which I was also a Member, has held that against the order passed by the Family Court in an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C., a revision application under Section 19 (4) of the Family Court Act, 1984 is fit to be registered as Criminal Revision and not as Civil Revision. I, thus, hold that this Civil Revision application is not maintainable in view of the aforesaid decision of the Division Bench of this Court. However, as prayed, the petitioner is granted liberty to convert this Civil Revision application into a Criminal Revision within two weeks, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. P.K. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)