1 MNM IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2076 OF 2002 Bhimrao Yashwant Ingle ...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondent Mr.Girish Godbole for Petitioner Mr. P.P.Kakade , A.G.P for State CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI & SHRI. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: 5TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. 1. We have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. The basic grievance of the petitioner is that the land in question was purchased by him in the year 1994. The declaration under Section 126(2) of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 was issued on 16 th November 1995. Learned Counsel contended that no notice was given to the petitioner about the fact that any such proceedings were initiated. 2 2. Learned Counsel has tendered in the Court a copy of the Award dated 18 th December 1997. Primafacie in our opinion it supports his contention. 3. In the circumstances of the case we feel that grievance of the petitioner should be looked into by respondents 2 and 3. 4. Mr. Godbole, learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will make a comprehensive representation setting out his grievance to the respondents within a period of 3 weeks. After such representation is received by respondents 2 and 3, they shall dispose it of within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of representation, and also communicate the result thereof to the petitioner. The representation be disposed of independently. We have not expressed any final opinion on the merits. 5. Petition is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (SHRI. J.P. DEVADHAR J.)