IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23599 of 2011 Ajay Kumar Sinha Versus The State Of Bihar Through The 3 8.9.2011 Heard. Petitioner’s earlier bail application was rejected vide order dated 1.3.2011passed in Cr.Misc.No.4220 of 2011 with an observation that if the trial is not concluded within six months, subject to petitioner’s cooperating, the petitioner would be entitled to renew his prayer for bail before this Court. It is not in dispute that the trial has not yet been concluded and the petitioner is not responsible for the delay in conclusion of the trial. Learned counsel for the C.B.I. vehemently argues that the petitioner is responsible for the delay because he several times has taken appropriate remedial steps against various orders. In my view, this is legitimate right of litigant which does not amount to intentionally delaying the case. Considering the aforesaid, let the petitioner, Ajay Kumar Sinha, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, C.B.I., South Bihar, Patna in Special Case No.02 of 2011, R.C. 2A/2011 subject to the condition that on every date in the case the petitioner would be physically present in the court and if on two dates petitioner is absent without any reasonable explanation the court would 2 have authority to cancel the bail. AnilKrSinha (Navaniti Prasad Singh,J.)