Crl. Misc No. M 26837 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M 26837 of 2011 Date of decision : September 28, 2011 Parveen and another, ...... Petitioners v. State of Haryana ...... Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. H.S.Baath, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Manmohan Sikka, DAG Haryana *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioners seek grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.108, dated 8.4.2011, registered under Sections 454, 380 of the IPC, at Police Station Ladwa, District Kurukshetra. On 5.9.2011 the following contention was noticed :- “ Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that though the petitioners had earlier filed a petition under Section 226 for habeas corpus against the partners of M/S Bhatta Company, Baddarpur and an inquiry was made in that petition on 4.4.2011 and report (Annexure P-3) was submitted before this court, no theft had taken place as mentioned in the FIR on 4.4.2011.” Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from HC Sham Sunder, has accepted this factual assertion. Crl. Misc No. M 26837 of 2011 ::2:: In these circumstances, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Consequently, the petitioners are directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 7.10.2011, and on any other day on which the Investigating Officer requires their presence, and in the event of their appearance, the petitioners shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Investigating Officer to his satisfaction subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) September 28, 2011. JUDGE `kk'