IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38702 of 2008 1. PUNDEO MAHTO @ PUNYADEO MAHTO 2. JAINUL MIAN @ SK. ZAINUL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 23.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a prosecution under Sections 2, 26, 33 of the Indian Forest Act and Sections 2, 9, 17, 27, 29, 31 of the Wild Life Protection Act. Alleging false implication, it is submitted that there has been no recovery from the petitioner neither they were apprehended at the spot. Learned counsel submits that it is rather difficult to identify six accused in a single torch light in the night. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Gayasuddin, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Bettiah in Forest Case No. 25-F of 2007, corresponding to trial no. 2271 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)