IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46607 of 2009 RAJU MAHTO SON OF LATE PERMESHWAR MAHTO @ SUKHARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.1.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner was implicated later on during investigation on suspicion, but there is no eye witness to the actual occurrence, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 10.8.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna in Ghoswari P.S.case No.66 of 1993, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The learned Magistrate is directed to immediately - 2 - commit the case for trial now that the petitioner has appeared and given an undertaking that he will not delay the trial in any manner. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )