HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATB1LASPUR PETmONER RESPONDENTS WMT PETmON CC) No. 4842 of2008 , Vasan Singh s/o Jogender Sing^i Aged about 66 Years R/o Paiidari Raipur, Distt. Raipyr (C.G.) Through Power ofAttomy Ajay Singh S/o Late Shri Satwatit Sing^ aged about 19 Years, R/o Mahendra Travels, Pandari Bus Staiid, Raipur Distt. Raipw (0.6.) VERSUS . - ,, : 1. State Govt. of CUhattisgaA, Through- Secretaiy, D.K.S. fihawan, Raijxir, Distt. Raipur(C.G.) =. . 2. State Transport Authority D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. - Raipur (CXj.) 3. Secretary, State Ttsnsport Authority D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur Distt.—Raipur(G.,6.) « , WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF TWE eONSTmJTION OF INDtA. , /' ::, , : ,,' SB:J!pn'bIe Shri Satish K. Ajs-idhotri, J. g Present: ShriAjayShrivastava,Advocate&rthepetitioner. t; Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy AdvoeateGeneral'wttttgiia-iSliasIi^nk Thakur, Pansl Lawyer forthe Stete/respondenits. ^ s ORALORDER (PassedonOl dayafSeptexribei-,2008) f 1. Wifh the consent ofthe parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner suhmits ftat the petitioner has filed an application for grant ofstate cairiage pemrit in Augusl, 2008. The case ofthe petitioner has not been listed for consideratitm in the agenda. He fiirther submits that there are other applications with regard to the same routes for which tfae acplications have been inade by the pemrit seekers. 3. There is no question of infi-action of any statutory Riiles and Rsgulations. However, in view ofthe facts ofthecase, it »sapprqniate ifthe committee is directed to coiisider the case offhe petitioner along with oflier similarly situated applications, as early as possible, for a partieular route.to be considered together and pass appropriate order in accordance with law on its own merits. VE"^'- -2- 4. Shri Harit sutanits Ihat if the applications have beec aade withia the prescribed time, if any, all the applications are necessary to be considered for a particular route in the agenda, together. 5. In view oflfae foreeoing averments msde by Isamed coumel forthe parties, ft is directed that all the applications f<^ a particular route .shall be considered together in the agenda, whether applicatioas are sfaown in the agenda or not. The petition accordingly stands disposed o£ No order asto eosts. 6. Consequently, I.A. No. 01, application for internn relief, also Ands disposed of 7. Certified copy, today itself. ,_, __ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^ Asts^.