IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10392 of 2007 SUDAMA SINGH Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.&ORS ----------- 5. 25.09.2008 I.A. No. 1825 of 2008 has been filed assailing the subsequent order of dismissal passed during pendency of the writ application. Having heard Counsels for the parties this Court is satisfied that the I.A. application needs to be allowed. This application is now being disposed at this stage itself by consent of the Counsels for the petitioner and the respondents. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner proposes to prefer appeal/review/revision against the order of punishment before the competent authority under the Rules. Counsels for the parties are further agreed that the authority competent to hear the same shall be the Chairman cum Managing Director of the respondent Corporation. In view of the consent of the parties no further orders are required except to direct that the appeal when preferred shall be disposed off appropriately in accordance with law within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order by a reasoned and speaking order. If the petitioner seeks a personal hearing that shall be considered appropriately by the authority concerned. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)