IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16895 of 2010 1. Amit Kumar, Son of Ramsogarth Sah. 2. Vinay Kumar @ Ram Binay Sah, Son of Rambalak Sah, both residents of Village- Parshurampur, P.S. Parsauni, District- Sitamarhi...............................................................Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR.......................................Opposite party. ----------- 2. 25.05.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioners are languishing in jail due to alleged misuse of bail. The petitioner was initially granted bail in a case registered under Section 414 of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the Explosive Substances Act. The bail bond was cancelled on 19.04.2010 on the ground that the application under Section 317 Cr. P.C. filed by a lawyer whose power was not on record on behalf of the petitioner and subsequently the other application was filed but the said lawyer conveyed that it is not his signature on the application. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that immediately after knowledge, the petitioner surrendered. 2 Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioners, Amit Kumar and Vinay Kumar @ Ram Binay Sah, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge-cum- F.T.C. Sitamarhi in connection with Sessions Trial No. 181 of 2009 arising out of Parsauni P.S. 42 of 2008. The petitioner henceforth will appear on regular basis before the trial court and if he fails to appear on two consecutive dates then the trial court may cancel the bail of the petitioner and may consider also not to grant bail to the petitioner till the conclusion of trial. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)