IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1020 of 2008 RANA UDAY PRASAD, S/o Sri Surya Narain Prasad, R/o Vill. Srichandpur, P.S. Harnaut, Dist. Nalanda Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Pappu Prasad S/o Jhallu Prasad 3. Jallu Prasad, S/o late Chotan Raut 4. Shakuntala Devi, W/o Jallu Prasad 5. Sanjay Prasad, S/o Jallu Prasad 6. Rina Devi W/o Sanjay Prasad All the R/o Vill. Purendra Bigha, P.S. Tharthari, District-Nalanda. ------ 2/ 19.08.2009 Heard both the parties. In the case demand of dowry causing of cruelty followed by killing the deceased was reported. Basing which matter was investigated, charge-sheet submitted and trial commenced under different Sections of the I.P.C. but after examination of six witnesses, petition was filed on behalf of the prosecution to charge for the offence under Sections 304B and 201 read with section 34 of the I.P.C. All the witnesses examined till order save and except P.W. 6, mother of the traceless girl, is about being traceless of P.W.6 daughter. She is only stating about killing of her daughter which is based on assumption of being traceless of her daughter and rest of the prosecution witnesses are constraint on the point victim was found traceless without any cogent evidence. In my view also framing the specific charge for the offence under Sections 304B and 201 of the I.P.C. are not justified and rightly has been refused by the Trial Court. Finding no illegality, this revision petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)