IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21141 of 2008 ARSAD ANSARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 08.07.2008 Learned counsel for the petitioner and State and the informant. Informant’s six years son Suman Kumar Patel was kidnapped. FIR was registered against unknown. In course of investigation the boy was recovered from another State and at that time he was weeping. He had sense of assault upon him. The boy has been examined under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C and his statement he has named three persons as his kidnappers. They were Munna Chacha, Irshad and Guddu. Submission is that the petitioner is not Munna. Only two persons have been named in the statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C and the name of three persons has been added without any evidence. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that Md. Habbish Anshari has given his statement that it was the petitioner who had named Munna Chacha. Considering the allegation of kidnapping, I am not inclined to grant bail. It is rejected presently. He may renew his prayer after examination of the victim in the trial court. Kundan/- (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)