^ -ii .-. r~. n ^ . \^ ' -^ ~'! IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (Cl N0 72-2-2-^ ygo11 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER ^^y^ e^^M^ .X .>'".^\a> ^y ~"y RESPONDENTS •" Dhruv Kumar Gabel, S/o- Shri A.P. Gabel, Aged about- 44 years, \.-f''r$-'' R/o- Post- Amandula, Tahsil- Sakti, Distt.- Janjgir- Champa, C.G. VERSUS ^ (l)Regional Transport Authority, BUaspi.ir, (C.G.) (2)Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER As mentioned in the cause title. 1»« t HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WMT PETmON CC) No. 7222 of2011 Dhmv Kumar Gabel. RESPONDENTS VERSUS Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur & Another. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE2260F THE CONSTITUTION OF BSTDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Sattsh K. Aenihotri. J. Present: Shri F.S.Khare, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. QRDER (Passed on 09th day ofDecember, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that nothing survives in this petition for adjudication as the petition has become infinetuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side does not controvert the above submission. 3. In view ofthe above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become mimctuous. __-—-— Satish K. Agnihotn Judge Aimf