as »' •'r-S "" ?"• .if.N! »At-- \ ir^ Stoc 'G <£-^/0-ZTy/. '/• ,:' !N THEHIGH COURT OF .lUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.fS) N0. m /2007 PETITIONER '(^y'^ yy^yy >'>c../' ^^/ ^lf ^ I^^Ram^^L.al^.Jagatjf&^SfTn^^Aktiram;1 jagat, agedal:>outi40 years, Head Master, Govt. Middle School — Nougadi, Block - Basna, Distt. - Mahasamund (C.G.) JK"':.^ ^" RESPONDENT'S ^^ VERSUS I^^Stateof Chhattisgarh, Through -• The Secretary Departmenf of Educatiori D.K.Si. Bhawan, :Raipur.(C.©.),s:^,.rs.;5^,; ^^^.^ .'.^''^_r'-.. :•' k^^^y^^^^'Dire^rpub'ic Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur ^' DistnGtEdycatjonOffiGer, Distt.- Mahasamurid (C.G.) 4^BloGkEdyeati6hOfficer, Block—Basna, Distt. - Mahasamund (C.G.) WRITPETITIONUNDERARTICLE2260FTHECONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA FOR ISSU^NCE OR SUITAB1.E WRIT. DlRECTrGN^TC.TODO.JUSTICEINTHEMATTER. ^•'"S^^hepetitipnerabovenamedmos^respectfully^su^^ BPAPNA («6HCOURT OFaWAmS&MW AT M.ASPUR W P{S)No 828of2007 ''•ai' Petitiwier Rom Lal Jagat Versus Respondents : State ofOiha-ttiqurh eBido-theFS SB: Hon'bleMr. JusticeSattsh K. <^nlh<rtri. J Presenf. Mp.AnilSinghRajput,Advocatefor1hepetitioner. <Ar. Satish 6i^ita,{>y. 6ovt. Advocate for the Stacte/respondents. OR&ER O'assed on 1hjs t2ttl Oay of February, 20)7) 1. The petitioner was oppointed in theyear 1984»85(AnnBxure P/i) as AssislantTwdier on fixcdpay scde offts, 300/-. Aftwcomptetiwi of one year probotion, he NKIS gpcntedre^lBff pay iSode^ 92S/-. 2. Leamed counsel appearmg for •rfi»petitkmer submits Itxrt Kie isaie invoked m the case is astp wriwther the petitioner is entitled I'o regular pay scale w.e.f. •the dhte of mitnl oppointmentor after comptetion of probtrtion period. 3. The isaie uivolved, herein was considlered by the Mudiyu PradeA State Administrative Tribuwl, Jdwlpur in O.A. No. 274S/89 (MBdhutamt YcAiand 5(6 olhers Vs, Storte of M.P. A others). wherom it was held 'that the simikn'ly siluated teochers ape wititted to regular paf scale w.e.f. •the dutfc of inrtial d|q}ointment. "Tlte nwnw wos tnten-up to 1fee Hon'ble Supreme Court. The dpped wus dismissed by Ihe Mon'bte Supreme Cpurl' lyholding Ihe decision of the Tribuial to 1he effeGt' Ihut- the Teachers/Assistant Teachers nre entitled to reyjlof pay scale from date of initinl oppomtment. 4. Lecmed counset appearm9 for •the petttioneri.furlhersubmitsthat this Court-, while considerm9 the snme issue in Sudiil Tnwari &others Vs. State 6ovt. of Chhcrttisgarh A olhers (WP. (S) No. 5976 of 2006)by order dated 7-11-2006, has grontedregular poy ScaleWAf. the darte ef initiul oppointmen*. 5. Leamed counsetappa>rin9 for the pa'ties Jointty submit that •this case is squarely cbvered by -the ctecision of •this Coupt in •thecase of Sudiil Tiwari & oltiers Vs. Stute Sovt. of Chhattisgcn+i & o'rtiers (Supra). 6. In viewof -that, this petition is allbwed m'the same terms. No onter cstocosts. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge '-."':