FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12197 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 21229 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Shri. S.S. Patil, Advocate for the applicant. Shri. S.S. Kazi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Shri. S.B. Choudhary, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM : K. K. TATED, J. DATE : 25th November,2010. PER COURT : . Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Present Civil Application is preferred by the original respondent No.1 for condonation of seven days delay in preferring appeal against the judgment and award dated 04-02-2010 passed by the District Judge-6 Aurangabad in M.A.C.P. No.77/2007. 2. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant states that the applicant's head office is at Mumbai and in getting the approval and the sanction from the head office, the delay of seven days is caused in preferring the appeal. He submits that the delay has been satisfactorily explained in Para-5 of the application. 3. The learned Counsel for the respondents opposed the present application on the ground that there is no sufficient ground for condonation of delay in preferring the present appeal. 4. I have gone through the reasons given in Para-5, in which it is stated that the applicant's head office is at Mumbai and they have to take sanction from the head office. In getting sanction from the head office, there is delay of seven days. 5. Considering the reasons disclosed by the applicant, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B), which reads as under : "(B) The delay of 7 days in filing the First appeal may kindly be condoned in the interest of justice." 6. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. [ K. K. TATED, J.] sut/Nov10/ca12197.10