IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9955 of 2011 RAJENDRA SAHANI & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.04.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that the complainant was in possession of the land and has paid Rs. 10,000/- to one Prabhu Sahni, owner of the land, who assured the complainant to execute the sale deed but unfortunately he died then complainant approached his four sons and their wives who further received Rs.10,000/- from the complainant for executing the sale deed but subsequently the sale deed was executed on 09.08.2008 in favour of Madhuri Devi and Sanjay Kumar and in the said sale deed these petitioners were witnesses. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are simply bonafide witnesses to 2 the sale deed. Considering the averment of the complainant who admits the title of the vendor, let the petitioners, Rajendra Sahani and Rahul Sahani, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 1467C of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Khagaria, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)