IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21442 of 2009 RAVI KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 10.08.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Section 302 of the I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act. The F.I.R. was lodged against unknown. It is alleged that when the deceased had gone out of home he was killed in the way. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner along with others were arrested on 16.3.2006 in a case instituted under Sections 399 and 402 I.P.C. Subsequently, he was remanded in this case on 22.4.2006. It is submitted that only material against him is confessional statement before the police naming few persons including co-accused Shashi Kumar whereof aforesaid Shashi Kumar was arrested along with a mobile phone allegedly belonging to the victim. It is contended that aforesaid co-accused Shashi Kumar has since then granted privilege of bail by this Court in Cr.Misc. No. 17029 of 2008 dated 17.07.2008. Counsel for the petitioner submits 2 that petitioner is in custody since 22.4.2006. In the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner namely, Ravi Kumar be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of a sum of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Fast Track Court – Ist Patna in connection with Jakkanpur P.S. Case No. 55 of 2006 subject to the condition that one of the bailor should be his own/close family relative. Bibhash (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)