IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 3RD OCTOBER 2008 / 11TH ASWINA 1930 W.P.(C).No.29151 of 2008 (U) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- THOMAS C. GEORGE, S/O. LATE C.T. GEORGE, AGED 49 YEARS, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT (PROTECTED), LITTLE FLOWER C.G. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR - 680 121. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENREAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR EAST. 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, IRINJALAKUDA - 680 121, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. A.J. VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No.29151 OF 2008 (U) = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 3rd day of October 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that she was a Teacher in charge of Headmaster of P.A.U.P. School, Chemboothra, the recognition of which was withdrawn on 15.7.2007. Petitioner submits that all except the petitioner were deployed following the withdrawal of the recognition and that his retention in the school was necessitated for safe custody and maintenance of the records. Thereafter, on the basis of the representation made by the petitioner, he was also deployed in July, 2008. It is stated that during the period from 1.6.2007 to 30.6.2008, his salary, increment and other benefits were not given. This made the petitioner to file Ext. P9 representation before the 1st respondent and complaining that orders on Ext. P9 have not been passed, this writ petition has been filed. 2. The facts being so, I see no reason why the 1st respondent should not consider Ext. P9 and dispose of the same on W.P.(C) No.29151 OF 2008 - 2 - an expeditious basis. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to take up, consider and pass orders on Exts. P9 with notice to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 3 months of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-