IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2010 / 12TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 23817 of 2010(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M/S. D.C.MILLS (PVT.) LTD., REP. BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER, REGISTERED OFFICE AT 134/1, MANNANCHERY P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP SRI.V.S.AFSAL KHAN SRI.V.A.SHAJI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. VINOD KUMAR V.T., KOTTAMPARAMBIL, S.L.PURAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA-688 523. 2. ANIL G., KATTIYAPARAMBU, KANICHIKULANGARA, ALAPPUZHA-688 544. 3. MATHAI T.M., THAIVELIYIL VEEDU, POLLATHAI, ALAPPUZHA-688 567. 4. UNNIKRISHNAN N., CHANNATHUVELI, PONNADU P.O., MANNACHERRY, ALAPPUZHA-688 538. 5. MANESHKUMAR, THAKIDIVELI, MARRARIKULAM NORTH P.O., ALAPPUZHA-688 549. 6. BAIJU P., POONTOPPUVELI, S.L.PURAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA-688 523. 7. BIJU D., VANASWARGATHUVELI, S.L.PURAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA-688 523. -: 2 :- 8. RATHEESH R., CHAKKANATTUVELI, POLLATHAI, ALAPPUZHA-688 567. 9. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARARIKULAM, ALAPPUZHA. 10. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NORTH POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA. 11. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARARIKULAM, ALAPPUZHA. 12. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUHAMMA, ALAPPUZHA. R9 TO 12 BY GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.T.K. VIPIN DAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 23817 of 2010 B - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking the following reliefs: i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing respondents 9 to 12 to afford adequate police protection to the petitioner's unit of the company and its officers, workers, building, plant, machinery and the vehicles and for the smooth functioning the day to day work of the factory and also officials of the government officers. ii) to issue a declaration that the petitioner company has the right to shift the working arrangement and employee to any department, section or units owned by the management. W.P.(C).No. 23817 of 2010 2 iii) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate direction or order, directing respondents 9 to 12 to consider and take appropriate action on Exts.P1 and P4 petition and afford necessary and adequate protection to the petitioner company, its workers. 2. Today when the matter came up, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 8 submits that the matter has been settled and there will be no obstruction. 3. We record the said submission and dispose of the Writ Petition. We make it clear that in case there is any obstruction from respondents 1 to 8 , the petitioner is free to move the 9th respondent for appropriate orders. (K. M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) Judge tm