1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6170 OF 2010 ( Mohd. Yousuf s/o. Usmangani Memon Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. D.B. Pawar-Pathrekar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.K. Tambe, AGP for respondent No. 1. Mr. V.V. Bhavthankar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 & 4. Mr. S.G. Chapalgaonkar, Advocatre for respondent No. 5. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATED : 11th October, 2010. PER COURT : 1. The petitioner contends that though he has been duly selected for the post of "Pharmacist " against the post reserved for physically handicapped person, he has been denied the appointment by the respondent No. 3. The learned counsel relies on the Government Circular dated 3rd November 2006 and the report of the Member of the Medical Board dated 11th of March 2010. 2. The learned counsel for Zilla Parishad submits that since the State of Maharashtra vide Government Resolution dated 2nd of July 2008 has specified that only such persons, having low vision between 40% to 60% are eligible to be appointed, the appointment order could not be issued in 2 favour of the petitioner. 3. The reliance placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is mainly on the Administrative Circular dated 3rd November 2006, whereas the learned counsel for Zilla Parishad relies on the Government Resolution, which is issued by the State of Maharashtra, which is of 2nd July 2008 and as such, supersedes the provisions of the Government Circular issued earlier. 5. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. The petition is, therefore, rejected. [ A. A. SAYED ] [ B. R. GAVAI ] Judge Judge ssc/wp6170.10