1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. COMPANY PETITION NO.812 OF 1997 WITH COMPANY PETITION NOS.813, 814 & 815 OF 1997 C.P. 812/97: Mukeshkumar Mehra. ...Petitioner. Vs. TME Plasmettrronics Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondent. .... C.P. 813/97: Deepak S. Mirg. ...Petitioner. Vs. TME Plasmettrronics Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondent. .... C.P. 814/97: Anil S. Mirg. ...Petitioner. Vs. TME Plasmettrronics Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondent. .... C.P. 815/97: Smt. Nirmala Pahlajrai. ...Petitioner. Vs. TME Plasmettrronics Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondent. .... Ms.Neeta Solanki i/b. K.P. Jain for the Petitioners. Mr. Dhanuka i/b. K. R. Dhanuka for the Respondent. ..... 2 CORAM :DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. April 11, 2007. P.C.: Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners states that after a conditional order was passed in this batch of petitions, the dispute between the parties was settled. The Company Petitions are accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. .....