IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1156 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:17.02.2011. Harcharan Singh ...Petitioner Versus Smt. Champa and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 08.01.2011 by which application filed by the petitioner for seeking de-exhibition of the documents which have already been brought on record as exhibits, has been dismissed on the ground that mere exhibiting of the document does not dispense with its proof and the genuineness of the document is to be decided on the basis of the evidence led by the parties. Moreover, in a judgment of the Supreme Court rendered in the case of Sait Tarajee Khimchand and others Vs. Yelamarti Satyam and others, AIR 1971 Supreme Court 1865 the same view has been taken that marking of a document as an exhibit does not dispense with its proof. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the present revision petition and as such, the same is hereby dismissed in limine, however, without any order as to costs. February 17, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE