IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 28TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 7TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 34278 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- PRASEETHA.K, W/O. RAJESH BABU.C, RADHIKA NILAYAM, IRVETTY, THOLTTILAGADI.(P.O), ARECODE VIA, MALAPPURAM (DT). BY ADV. SRI.RAJAN KUDUMBATHIL RESPONDENT: --------------- CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENJIPALAM, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY TENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM (DT). BY SC- SHRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.34278 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 28th November, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner, who has completed her B.A Degree Course from a college affiliated to the University of Calicut, had written the Examination held in April/May, 2007. Apparently, dissatisfied by the marks obtained in three papers, she had applied for revaluation. She is aggrieved that the result of the revaluation has not been published so far. 2. I heard learned standing counsel for the University also. There is no justification for the delay in the publication of results of revaluation in respect of the Examination held in April/May 2007. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to publish the results of the revaluation sought for by the petitioner in relation to the Final Year B.A Degree Examination held in April/May, 2007, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of W.P ( C) No.34278 of 2008 2 six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment provided the application for revaluation is in order and otherwise correct. (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.34278 of 2008 3 W.P ( C) No.34278 of 2008 4 (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.34278 of 2008 5 W.P ( C) No.34278 of 2008 6 (V.GIRI,JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No.34278 of 2008 7 W.P ( C) No.34278 of 2008 8