IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.34512 OF 2009 RAM GAHAN SINGH, SON OF LATE RAM DHARI SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHAVIRGANJ, POST OFFICE MALUARK, POLICE STATION CHARPOKHARI, DISTRICT BHOJPUR VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR WITH CR.MISC. NO.34934 OF 2009 LAW KUMAR NIRDOSH, SON OF RAM CHANDRA SAH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GARHANI, POLICE STATION CHARPOKHARI, DISTRICT BHOJPUR AT ARRAH VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ********* 2 16/11/2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 120B, 341, 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The First Information Report has been instituted alleging therein that the informant runs a private company and that the petitioners had taken payment by presenting forged coupons. With respect to the petitioner Ram Gahan Singh, it is submitted that in the First Information Report itself, it has been stated that Dhananjay Singh and Satya Narayan Singh were utilizing the account for the purposes of business. It is, therefore, submitted that the allegations against the petitioner Ram Gahan Singh does not appear to be true. With respect to the petitioner Law Kumar 2 Nirdosh, learned Counsel submits that it appears from the First Information Report itself, the petitioner has been named on suspicion and it has been stated that the matter requires enquiry. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the total amount alleged to have been defalcated is Rs. 1,25,000/-. There is no evidence to show even prima facie that those coupons were fabricated or forged. Finally, it is submitted that it is a case of over accounting dispute and business transactions, and as such the petitioners may be granted anticipatory bail. Be that as it may, the above named petitioners are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below in Charpokhari Police Station Case No. 65 of 2009 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Arrah subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)