IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 10TH AUGUST 2007 / 19TH SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 14258 of 2004(V) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------- R.P.RAJESH, KARTHIKA, UDIYANKULANGARA, ARAYOOR POST, VIA AMARAVILA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD., NEYYATTINKARA BRANCH - II, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE, STATUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.RAJU JOSEPH, ADDL.SC.,KSFE LTD. SRI.M.SASINDRAN, SC, K.S.F.E., LTD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.14258/2004 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT. 15.3.02. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT. 15.3.02. EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT. 15.3.02. EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT. 15.3.02. EXT.P5:- COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT. 15.3.03. EXT.P6:- COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DT. NIL ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P7:- COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DT. 2.4.04 ISSEUD BY THE 2ND RESPON TO THE PETITIONER. ANNEXURE R1:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT. 15.3.02. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE tss KURIAN JOSEPH , J ========================== W.P.(C) NO. 14258 OF 2004 ========================== Dated this the 10th day of August, 2007. JUDGMENT Petitioner approached this Court with certain grievances regarding the steps initiated at the instance of the 1st respondent. The learned counsel for the 1st respondent submits that huge amounts are due from the petitioner and the interim order passed by this Court was also not complied with. Be that as it may, the petitioner only prays for an opportunity to approach the 1st respondent seeking the benefit of settlement schemes if any and for payment in instalments. In the event of the petitioner approaching the 1st respondent, the matter will be duly considered by the 1st respondent and eligible benefits if any available shall be extended to the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. rv