IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21261 of 2009 ARJUN MANDAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 18.08.2009 Heard both sides. This case reflects misuse of privilege of bail. Petitioner was made accused in a case instituted under Section 47 of the Excise Act and 16/20 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Petitioner was granted bail on merit in the year, 1999 itself. He continued to appear in Court for few years. It appears, on 21.2.2004 he was declared absconder as the bail bonds was cancelled. Petitioner is in custody since 25.3.2009. Learned counsel tried to explain the circumstances under which no pairvi/representation could be filed on behalf of the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Nalanda at Biharsharif in 2 connection with Ekangar Sarai (Telhara) P.S. Case No. 218 of 1999, subject to the following conditions:- (I) Both the bailors should be the own/close family members of the petitioner. (II) Petitioner shall appear before the court below in person on each date fixed at the trial. In case, of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, it shall be open to the trial court to cancel their bail bonds and secure their arrest in accordance with law. P.K. (K. K. Mandal, J.)