1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 320 OF 2003 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 320 OF 2003 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 320 OF 2003 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2399 OF 2002 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2399 OF 2002 SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2399 OF 2002 Wud Lam Enterprise ..Plaintiffs versus Grade Products & Anr. ..Defendants Mr. V. S. Master for the Plaintiffs. Defendant No.2 present in person. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE,J. DATE : 6TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 6TH OCTOBER 2004. DATE : 6TH OCTOBER 2004. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . Heard learned counsel for the Plaintiffs. Defendant No.2 who is sole proprietor of the defendant No.1 is also present. They file Minutes of Consent Decree duly signed by the plaintiffs and their Advocate and Defendant No.2 who is present for himself as well as for the defendant No.1. Minutes of Consent Decree taken on record and marked ’X’ for identification. There shall be a decree as per the Minutes of Consent Decree. Refund of court fees as per the Rules. Suit and Summons for Judgment stands disposed of accordingly. Certified copy expedited. 2 ****