IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.882 of 2008 URMILA DEVI WIFE OF LATE ALAKH KUMAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA, CHINIMILL P.O- GAJADHARGUNJ, P.S. BUXAR TOWN, DISTRICT BUXAR. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY-CUM- COMMISSIONER, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, NEW SECRETARIATE, PATNA. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, VEER KUNWAR SINGH, UNIVERSITY ARA. 3. THE REGISTRAR, VEER KUNWAR SINGH UNIVERSITY, ARA. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, M.V. COLLEGE BUXAR. ----------- 06. 16.04.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State as also the respondent University. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, as highlighted in the writ application and including the claim that her husband should have been confirmed as some other employees who were junior to the petitioner in class – III Cadre were confirmed, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 2. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation 2 in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation However, in case representation of the petitioner finds favour, the necessary further order shall be issued at the earliest so that the grievance of the petitioner as raised in the representation could be settled without further delay. Upon consideration, if any of the claims or part of the claims are found not admissible the same shall be disposed of by reasoned order and shall communicate the petitioner by post under registered cover. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)