N HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : Bl ASPUR 1‘13”; EETITION 1§I &Q 1§§ OE 290§ PET Tl N P.W.D. Mazdor Union. RaipurLIhrough its Secretary, Sukhdas Banjare. son of K.M. Banjate, Sharda Chowk. Raipur.’ Versus 1. State of Madhya Pradesh, through Secrehry, PWD Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal. 2. Engineer-in-cmef. Pwn (38R), BhopaL' 3. Chief Engineeir, Pwo (3&R). Raipur Division, Raipur. 4. Superintending Engineer, PWD (B&R). Raipur Division, Raipur. RES&NQ§NT§ Single Bénch : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :g Shri Satyendra Shau, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. QBAL OEQER (Passed on this 28 day of July. 2009) Heard learned counsel for the parties. At the very outset. Shri Sahu, leamecl counsel appearing for the petitioner. on instruction, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest the matter on merits; however, the petition may be disposed of in view of averments made in the return dated 4-8-1998. The relevant portion of the return reads as under : " e. Para 6.10 : It is submitted that the memo of the Exec/utive Engineer, PWD hr“ lieu of the previous Govt. Orders. Now N the agtion has already been initiated by the Executive Engineer of the Divisions a. Division No.1, Raipur did. 14/1/88 is in Gowri for giWng benehts to permanent labourers in the light of fresh Govt. orders. A copy of the order so issued by the Govt. are enclosed and filed as Annexure — R~II to in view of foregoing. Without expressing any opinion of the merits of the case. the writ petition is disposed of. emish K. Agnihom i ‘ ii Sdl- . Judge / 7