IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1275 of 2004 BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS. -APPELLANTS Versus PARAS NATH SINGH & ORS -OPP.PARTY With LPA No.1072 of 2004 BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS. -APPELLANTS Versus GAYA PRASAD SINHA & ORS. -OPP.PARTY ---- FOR THE APPELLANTS : M/S VINAY KIRTI SINGH & VIJAI KUMAR VERMA. FOR THE RESPONDENTS: MR. DHIRENDRA KUMAR. 6 18.12.2008 Respondents-appellants, aggrieved by the order dated 12.10.2004 passed by a learned single Judge in CWJC no. 8399 of 2004, have preferred these appeals under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. When the appeals were taken up on 17.11.2005 by a Division Bench it was directed to be listed before the Full Bench. Accordingly, the appeals have been listed before us. Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh appears on behalf of the appellants whereas the respondents are represented by Mr. Dhirendra Kumar. It is common ground that the issue involved in 2 these appeals are covered by the decision of the Full Bench in the case of Ram Binod Singh Vrs. Bihar State Electricity Board ; (2007) 3 P.L.J.R. 398. In view of aforesaid, we direct the appellants to examine the issue in regard to the excess payment, if any, bearing in mind the ratio of the judgment of this Court in the case of Ram Binod Singh (Supra). Appellants will do this exercise within three months from today and communicate their decision to the respondents within the aforesaid period. Needless to say that in case the writ petitioners- respondents are aggrieved by the same, they shall have liberty to assail the same in accordance with law. These appeals are, accordingly, disposed of with the modification aforesaid. (C.K. Prasad, ACJ.) (Barin Ghosh, J.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) AAhmad 3