CWP(T) No. 10526/2008 18.08.2011 Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R. M. Bisht, Dy. A. G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G for respondents No.1 & 2 The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayers:- “1) That the impugned order dated 23.5.2003 and 2.8.2003 so far the same pertains to grant of revised pay scale to the contract teachers/lecturers may declared to be validity issued and the applicant may be held entitled for all consequential benefits alongwith interest at some nationalized Bank rate. 2) That the Annexure A-1 and Annexure A-2 may kindly be quashed and set aside.” 2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter in issue is squarely covered by the decision rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in Nek Ram vs. State of H.P. & Ors., CWP(T) No.14232 of 2008. 3. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioner submits that he would file an appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. As and when the same is made the second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment referred to in this judgment while submitting the representation. 4. With the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed off. August 18, 2011 ( Sanjay Karol ), (rana) Judge.