IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44797 of 2010 BAIDNATH SAHANI @ BAIDYA NATH SAHANI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.12.10. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 04.06.2010 in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 17 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. It is alleged that 500-600 people variously armed entered into premises of the informant and robbed Rs. 1,72,000/-. Though the F.I.R. has been lodged against 500-600 unknown extremists but subsequently the petitioner’s name surfaced on the statement of other persons but no recovery has been made from the petitioner nor the petitioner was put on T. I. Parade till date. Though no statement has been made in the petition about criminal antecedent but it is submitted that the petitioner has only been involved in one other case of petty nature. It is further submitted that similarly situated accused persons have also been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 39290 of 2010, 33001 of 2010 and 2 38819 of 2010. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Sitamarhi, in connection with Belsund P.S. Case No. 30 of 2010 on verification that the petitioner is involved in one other case apart from the present case and the learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner involves in future in similar nature of offence or the petitioner fails to appear on three consecutive dates during trial. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)