IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13532 of 2011 Date of Decision: July 29, 2011 Sahil Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that on 15.12.2010 and 22.12.2010, Sarpanch was appearing in the examination at Jammu and was not present in the village. He has further stated that voucher dated 22.12.2010 has been prepared ante-dated with malafide intention to grab the Gram Panchayat property by leasing out in favour of the nears and dears. Mr.Deepak Girotra, A.A.G, Haryana has accepted notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Let private respondents be served dasti in addition to normal mode of service. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further stated that the complaint (Annexure P-1) was moved before the Deputy Commissioner (Respondent No.2), however, no action has been taken thereon. Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case and maintainability of the appeal, present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take decision on Annexure P-1 within 60 days from the date the certified copy of this order is placed before him in accordance with law at its own merit. (Alok Singh) July 29, 2011 Judge BB