IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-A No. 679-MA of 2008 Date of decision : 11.11.2010 Om Parkash ...Appellant versus Firms (Unknown) & General Public and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for the appellant. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the appellant to avail his appropriate remedy before the Court of Sessions Judge along with an application for condonation of delay. 2. In this view of the matter, the instant petition is directed to be dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 3. Needless to say that the concerned Court would consider the application for condonation of delay sympathetically. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) November 11, 2010 Judge naresh.k