IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.61 of 2008 RATNESHWAR PRASAD SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 8.12.2008 The learned counsel for the State is present. Perused the record. In the instant writ application the petitioner has prayed for an appropriate direction to the respondent police not to harass him in any way. He states that Bidupur P. S. Case No.114 of 2000 was instituted under sections 302 and 201/34 of the I.P.C.. On the basis of confessional statement of one Sone Lal Paswan name of one Ratnesh Singh of village – Bhagwanpur figured. As the police instead of looking for Ratnesh Singh began to harass this petitioner who was of another village. The police submitted chargesheet against the right person, namely, Ratnesh Singh of different village. The petitioner is being wrongly harassed. The C.J.M., Vaishali also took cognizance against six persons including Ratnesh Singh. The learned counsel for the State submits that the allegation of the petitioner is misfounded. After going through the record and hearing the learned counsel for the State, this Court observes that it would be open to the petitioner to make a complaint to Senior officer, if he is harassed by local officers. With the aforesaid observation this writ application is disposed of. Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.) 2