IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36743 of 2009 RAVI PANDEY son of Srikant Pandey Versus STATE OF BIHAR 3. 14.12.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 302, 324, 323, 342, 341, 147, 148, 149 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. Taking into consideration the fact that even though the petitioner is named in the first information report as one of the nine accused persons but specific overt act has been alleged against Shambhu Singh, Narain Singh, Dashrath Singh, Bhola Singh, Anjali and Baijnath during the investigation and not against the petitioner, who is said tobe merely a member of mob, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Pauthu P.S. Case No.31 of 2007 subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on the date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Md.S. (Anjana Prakash,J.)