IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 866 of 2008 Yogesh @ Ishwar @ Yogeshwar Kumar & others .........Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ............ Respondents Mr. Lalit Miglani, Advocate vice Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Lalit Miglani, Advocate vice Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B. S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. 2. Learned Brief Holder for the State submits before this Court that it has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is no prima-facie case against the petitioners, namely Yogesh @ Ishwar @ Yogeshwar Kumar, Pradeep Kumar and Jagdish Pyarelal, and as such the police has submitted the final report before the S.P. City concerned. It was further submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioners seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against them has, now, become infructuous. As such, the police is likely to submit the final report before the competent court in the near future. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 24.12.2008 LSR