1 ABA 90 OF 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.90 OF 2011 Anupsingh Arjansingh Sodhi .. Applicant -versus The State of Maharashtra . Respondent. Mr. A. P. Mundargi, Senior Counsel with Mr. P.R.Arjunwadkar, for the Applicant. Mr. S.D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 10th February, 2011. P.C. 1. This is an application by an Architect, who for his client is alleged to have prepared a plan for sanction of construction without disclosing that there was already a sanctioned plan in respect of entire undivided plot and also by including area of D.P. Road. The original owner of the the plot one Bhawansingh, is alleged to have sold a part of the plot to his grand son Mr.Rajesh Talreja. Then Rajesh Talreja sold the said plot to another person and it has now been transferred to Mr.Chandwani, who are clients of present applicant. At Chandwani’s behest, the applicant is alleged to have prepared plan. Considering the nature of allegations made, the applicant’s being in custody for the purpose of investigation may not be necessary. Hence in the event of applicant’s arrest in CR No. I 10/2011 registered with Vithalwadi Police Station, 2 ABA 90 OF 2011 District:Thane, he be released on bail on his furnishing PR Bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.1,00,000/- on the following conditions :- i) The applicant shall make himself available on 14.02.2011, at 10.00 a.m. for interrogation by Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required Investigating Officer. ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. iv) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, in S.L.P No.7615 of 2009. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)