f.A^ ;\ ^) l^v SinglsSsntih IN THE HIGH COURi' OF JUDICATUBE AT BILASPUR (CG) WKIT PETITION N0« S 1 4* OF 2005 BETtTCEN ^' puneshwar Chandra S/o shri Achhe Rara Chandrs, aged about 47 years, sarpaach^ Gram Panchayat Balpur Taasil Bilaigarh c/ Distric^- Ra4»^l'^JtCG).. ~^y A^^' ...s^y --y^^ PETITIONER •A N D ^^^.. ^^sl ^^^••"'"S^ The state o£ CKhattisgarh, throagh Secretary ^ Panchayat, Mantralay, D.KoS. Building, Raipur (CG) 2. Chief Blectlon Officer, Local Adminj-stration CHhatt-i-sgarh, Raipur (CG). ^' Elector Officer/Collector, RaJ.pur (CG). Assistant Election Bfficer, Janpad Panchayat Silaigarh Dlstrict Raipur (CG$. Sub DJ.visJ.onal Officer, Bilaigarh District Raipar, Naib Tahslldar.Bhatgaon, District Raipur . Meera Bai. Chandrak.ar .Contesting cadldate for the post of sarpanch of Grali Panchayat Balpur, Tabs-i-1 Bilaigarh District Raipur (CG). RESPOITOENTS WEIT PETITION UNDER AETICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA rs-,i»^-^/-iit^ -.vn^.—<-i-S: —^f^-i^- r^ ^, ^- -^ 4- A^~^ x 3:tlt?T i'7! 1%;5R; ^STi 3il^t %tiR? -3^ •^TqTcpT, «tily<|is,'R^Tray ^.........(^.4,U.O.^..l'4.^ q) OTtwn'ttiTiratn ^sifwsi Shr'i Awodh TripQThi, c^unsei fof The peTitionet*. 5hpi Frashant MishrajAdd!. ActvQccts ^sngrai for th®5tate/ rsspondents No.l to 6. H^?*"d h?)th ths ^oijn^et. v Y 3^±Tnl ^w L^VSS'J ff^^ ^vur ]^&^+ ^ The caaa of the peti^ioner is that eiection for the pc'ata of SarDanch and Panc.h of the 6rcm Panchma* Boic-ur Viio.s heia' on l"t ^Januar" 2005. The oetitionA" is the ex-Sar'Danch of the vi!!aae arsd i hjs wite has contested the eMction tor the post OT SarDanch. i ne mcin opievQnce OTI We oeTiTioner raisea in Tne DetiTion is tho.t durln9 tne v'oting, some ^ow.s voting took piaee iand 1'h's eomplaint ot ~he. sayns WQS n~sQds to th^ Collsctof1 ^nd retur^inc o"ffic£r. On his BiL compiaint, The S.&.O., Biiaigaj'h asted respondent No-6 to conducT an enqijiry ir.to ths slleoatioRS 4' *h®pstitioner, but sss far respondsnt No.6 hcs not submitted any raport. ?uT. DeruSGl OT tne votes has been Tahen DJsce orj D03T Of •S'Grpuj'iCFi i3 TuKgH Lip is iocks in miateriai particular: ths si^ction ond countin^ of or'^aTcour'^s.'tHiaT" bst'tiQH ^hows that nothlna nQs bssn msntioned 'n ths petition aBout the fact that whether counting of not. Normaify, counTinq of voTss for The on the soime day. T^ierefore, the petition snd fiecessa."y facTs about the resuit o* 'the yotgs hays nct bsen nientiQnsd. Xri ns[Vs^oeeh-'Ta'KBn"pTa£s""3R'WS^sR'6 da'/, ^ISSI ^Ls^\ ^T-HR—7R X^SViT^Rf; j '^^1 ^ <'I ^^l^ r take" 'ys, ~,^n^rs,^ gflHp-i'g. T^TW^ Wd T5W ('qSsT'Ri'ffK i ^ '^1 "\ ' f "a' ^RtiWHtg •3"t?! -A- ^iiqi-"frT -aw;ft ^ fe^t ^R(R ^aff'rfaan^i as such the petition is mia£;4"csivsd and on this ground ths sc.me is iiabie to be dismissed and it js accot'dingiy dlsmissed. The peTitioner, E?' jf wants, hs c<xn ayexii "thsr rsh^sdy avQiiabl®to hlm undsr ths law* 'i ' J .'. ^-.».^^^» . = - . . . .^ .. Consequently, AA.fv./.)^.No.275/2005 and I.A. No.648/2005 » :s!"i'i"?Ar1 rt;<f?^rt'Stf'rt rt'f' ^"ji?iU uisyv^&u vi< ^ I _ 1 Sdl. '-•C. Bhadoo ^"