BEFORE THE HON BLE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE A BILASPUR (C G) IN'THE MATTER OF HAISARE AGE 4 YEAR SON F SH UKADIYA l AISARE , ASSTN STATTICAL FFIC IBA WELFA RU, PEMANENT SIDEN F i DITC HADA M.P. PRESENT M-106, HIRAPR , IUR C.G. ‘ 1 UNON F ERON BLC GRIENCE t ENO N NEW ST OF MADH PRADS THRG EETAR RIBL ' WELFA) MTRALAY VALLABH BHAAN, BHOPAL M.P_. 3. STATE OF CHHATI'ISGARH, THROUGHSECRETARY, (TRIBAL WELFARE ) , MANTRALAYA, D.K.S. 4 BHAWAN 53,7475 G ggwmrmtwrnw E ROAD RAIPUR (C G) CELL f mm sscREmRy V H fag aMw/sw VERsus . I OINDIA THOG RUH SEETRYDEPRTNT CRA-AME OF PSNEL, PUI VA AND PSIN, KHA MARKET DELHI § ATE YA EH q’OUH SCRY (TA RE ANA §i -W () RESPONDENTS ’ hqcqm4% “Mg WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/ 227 OF THE STITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE TURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI AND ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT C R PA E \ N K { ‘ J'Va . May please your lordship :- 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER That the petitioner is the perTnanent resident of Distric M.P. and he was working in the State of Niadhya Pradesh belongs to T / é L B 8 S O f, RI T J BH, ISAT IS OER TRL RE ¢ AIPR f R RET O SRIT R , AT D U RAP PETITIONER ' N ‘A f r' \ \ t HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’bls Mr. Justice Satish K. Agihotri. Writ Petition No. 1913 of 2003 Petitioner ,B. L. Bhaisam Versus Respondents Union of India 8a others Shri M. K. “Bhadmi, Advocato for the petitioner. Shri S. K. Berhnal, Standing counsel for Respondent No. 1. Shri Saehin Singh Rajput for Respondents No. 2 and 4. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel lawyer for respondent No. 3. ORAL ORDER (6th February, 2006) The following order of the Co Agnihotxi,J urt was passed by Satish K. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is Workmg on the post of Assistant Statistical. Onicer 1n the Tribal Welfare Department 1s a permanent resxlent of Tahsil — Haida, D1st11ot— Hoshangabad 1n the State of Madhya Pradesh. The petitioner has been allocated to the State of Chhattisgarh and he wants his reallocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh. Learned counsel for the petitioner, snbm1ts ntatton to the respondents for redressal of his grievances Learned counsel appeanng for the respondents have no objection to the said submissmn. the petition} stands disposed of finally, with In View of the foregoing, on p instruction, that the petitioner be granted liberty to make a replese nto d of two irected to liberty to the petitioner to make an appropriate representatio the respondentsfanthonties concerned Within a peno weeks from today, and the respondents] authorities are d og i consider and dec1de the same,j in an objective manner, in within a perioEd of six weeks from the date of accordance with law, receipt of the representation, if anyl Certified copy, as per Rules. i Sd/- - . atlsh K Agmhot“ f1 Judge ’ ' Thakur -