WP(C) 6097/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE A. K. GOSWAMI Heard Mr. M. U. Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Dr. B. Ah med, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The grievance expressed by the writ petitioner is that though he had executed an d completed various works in terms of work orders issued, he has not been paid t he admitted amount of Rs.8,00,000.00 (Rupees Eight Lakhs ) only. The learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the nature of the grie vance expressed by the writ petitioner has been considered by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of (Tamsher Ali & others -vs- State of Assam and others) reported in 2008(4) GLT 1. In view of the aforesaid submission and upon hearing learned counsel for the par ties, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the case of the petitioner shall be dealt with by the respondents in terms of the directions and observations made in the case of Tamsher Ali (supra), as referred to above, and similar reliefs granted to the petitioners in the aforesaid case shall also be granted to the present petitioner as entitled under the law and as per the ratio laid down in the case above referred. With the aforesaid directions this writ petition shall stand disposed of.