1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the First day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14225 of 2011 1 MAHENDRAN 2 SURESH 3 MAHILA 4 THAVAMANI 5 KASI 6 ALAGURAJA 7 PRABHA 8 SELVI 9 VINOTH ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 TO 9 Vs STATE : REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALANGANALLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT CR.NO. 348 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPADIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 9 in Cr.No.348 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 338 and 506(ii) and 379 (NP) of I.P.C. Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioners are before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2.According to the case of the prosecution, when the de facto complainant was sitting in a public place, the accused 1 & 2, who are young men fired crackers, in view of Deepavali festival. The de facto complainant reprimanded and wanted them to go away to fire crackers. Further, it is alleged that these two accused pelted on the de facto complainant. According to the case of the prosecution, no injury has been caused by anybody. It is alleged that in the said occurrence, the gold chain worn by the de facto complainant was missing. 3.It is brought to the notice of the court that the two other accused have already been arrested. 4.I have considered the above submissions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5.Having regard to the fact that the occurrence itself was due to sudden quarrel and no injury was caused, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with stringent conditions: 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti, on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 9 shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioners 3, 7 & 8, being women shall report before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 01/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VADIPATTI. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALANGANALLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate SR. No.37492 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14225 of 2011 Date :01/11/2011 RJ/3.11.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/