IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.67252-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: DECEMBER 12, 2006 Harjit Singh ...PETITIONER VERSUS State of Punjab ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.R.K.Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.N.S.Gill, AAG, Punjab. ... Petitioner Harjit Singh apprehending his arrest in a non-bailable offence on the cross version in case FIR No.393 dated 30.6.2006 registered under Sections 326/323/324/148/149 IPC read with Sections 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Actat Police Station Sadar, Patiala, has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. In this case, earlier the petitioner filed a petition bearing Crl.Misc.No.54917-M of 2006 for the grant of anticipatory bail and the same was dismissed as withdrawn, as the petitioner had been attributed grievous injuries. Subsequently when the counsel for the petitioner was made aware that the petitioner has been attributed simple injuries, this second petition for anticipatory bail has been filed. Counsel for the respondent-State does not dispute the factum of attribution of simple injuries to the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner contends that in terms of the interim order dated October 31, 2006, the petitioner has joined the investigation. Counsel for the respondent-State on instructions from HC Paramjit Singh also does not dispute this fact. Crl.Misc.No.67252-M of 2006 -2- In view of the aforesaid, the interim order dated October 31, 2006 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. Disposed of accordingly. December 12, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE