IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Crl. Misc. No. M-8778 of 2011 Date of Decision:03.06.2011 Komal Preet Kaur and another .....Petitioners Vs. The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. R.L. Luthra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurag Garg Dhuriwala, DAG, Punjab for respondent – State. Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for applicant- respondent Nos.4 to 6. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to provide security and protection to life and liberty to the petitioners as they have solemnised their marriage against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 6. During pendency of this petition, on 30.5.2011, petitioner No.1 was directed to be present in the Court. In compliance of the direction issued by this Court on 30.5.2011, petitioner No.1 Komal Preet Kaur is present in the Court and she has stated that she is residing with her parents and she is not in need of any security. Learned counsel for the petitioner has brought to the notice of this Court that petitioner No.2 has been arrested in some other case. Since petitioner No.1 has shown her willingness to reside with Crl. Misc. No. M-8778 of 2011 -2- her parents and she is residing there as per her free will and she is not in need of any security and petitioner No.2 is also behind the bars, no further action is required, the petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. June 03, 2011 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) renu JUDGE