IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR TRANSFER PETITION FCIVIL1 N0. /^ /2010 c-^-^^ APPUCANT Smt. Jharna Rana, W/o Shri ^ 1 ^ (L»Piw''vikramsmgh Rana' aged about ^O.^ '^^' 30 years, resident of Qt. N0. 9 F ,. -J^^^ K.C.S.'Coloney, NearPetrol Pump, ^'..'^~''''~ ..-^a£'v' Sector- 8 Bhilai, Distt. Durg [CG] '-.>'w^""' \^- VERSUS RESPONDENTS Vikram Singh Rana, aged about 35 Years, S/o R.B.C. Rana, R/o Chitrakut Road, Near Sai Mandir, Jagdalpur, District Bastar [CG] APPUCATIONFOR UNDER SECTION'24 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE y i(f \^ HroHCOURT OF CHHATTKOARHAT BILASPUR TRANSFER PETmON (CIVII.LNO._16/2010 APPLICANT RBSPONDBNT Smt. Jhama Raiia Versus Vikram Singh Rana APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 24 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (Siade Bench: Hon'ble Shri N.K. Afiarwal. J.l Present : Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, counsel for fhe applicant ORAL ORDER (Passed on llthdayofApril, 2011) Heard. 2. This is an application filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking transfer of applicatfon flled by non-applicant under Section 30(1) (ia) (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, before fhe First Additional District Judge, Jagdalpur, Bastar in CivU suit No. 3-A/2009. 3. Leamed counsel for fhe applicant submlts (hat it would be great inconvenience for the applicant to travel such distance firom Durg to Jagdalpur, to attend the hearing. Notice was issued to the respondent but no one is appeared. 4. In Ihe inatter of Sufivlta. Stngh os. Kum.ar Sanjeiy and Another; reported in AIR 2002 SC 396, Hon'ble fhe Supreme Court has held that la matrimorual matters where the proceedings are iiiitiated by (he husband against wife, ttie wife's conveiiience inust be looked into. 5, In vlew of fhe above and more particularly m view of the inconvenience whlch the applicant is likely to siiffer, ..i"ssss'-aaa,.\ s^. /: ^"'•^ S i^....s!lSks, ^ ^-ss^^s^ % 't.SFI>'°a% 1 ^ as projected in the transfer application, it is directed that Civfl Suit No.3-A/2009, VUcram Singh Rana Vs. Smt. Jhama Rana, pending before the First Additional District Judge, Jagdalpur, Bastar is transferred to competent jurisdiction at Dvixg. It is (Urected that after receipt of the ffle, fhe Trial Court shafl issue fresh summons to both fhe parties for their appearance for fiirther trial. 6. Accordingly, transfer petition standsallowed. Sd/- ""' . N.K. Agarwal Judge Kvr