IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2010 / 12TH SRAVANA 1932 WA.No. 1214 of 2010() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.26449/2009 Dated 15/06/2010 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER ------------------------ G.VIJAYAN, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.GOVINDAN, VILAYATHU KIZHAKKETHIL VEEDU, OLAKETTIYAMBALAM P.O MAVELIKARA (MILMA AGENT, GOVERNMENT TALUK HOSPITAL COMPOUND, MEVELIKARA) BY ADV. SRI. K.SHAJ SRI.SAJJU.S RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (M) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA. 5. DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH, ALAPPUZHA. 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT, GOVERNMENT TALUK HOSPITAL, MAVELIKARA. 7. HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, MAVELIKKARA. 8. MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA CO-OPERATIVE MILK MARKETING FEDERATION LTD., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 9. THE DAIRY MANAGER, ALAPPUZHA DIARY, KERALA CO-OPERATIVE MILK MARKETING FEDERATION LTD. PUNNAPRA. R1 TO R6 BY G.P. SRI.LAKSHMI NARAYAN THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ALONG WITH W.P.(C) NO.26449/2009 ON 03/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. .................................................................... Writ Appeal No.1214 of 2010 & W.P.(C) No.26449 of 2009 .................................................................... Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2010. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Similar cases are disposed of by us vide judgment in W.A. No.1066/2010 and connected cases on 2.8.2010. The order under challenge in this Writ Appeal namely, Ext.P7 was the very same order challenged in those connected cases and we have upheld the validity of the Government's proposal challenged by the appellants therein. Following the said judgment we dispose of this Writ Appeal and the W.P.(C) with the same observations, findings and directions as contained in the said judgment. Registry will attach a copy of the judgment in the above cases to form part of this judgment. Counsel for the appellant/petitioner submitted that appellant/petitioner has got extension of licence under Government Orders. We do not think there 2 is any need for us to consider this contention because if the appellant/petitioner is granted extension of licence by the Government, it is for him to enjoy the benefit. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge P.S.GOPINATHAN Judge pms