FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2945 OF 2005 ALONG WITH WRIT PETITON NOS.2946/05, 2947/05, 2948/05, 2949/05, 2950/05, 2951/05, 2952/05, 2953/05, 2954/05, 2955/05, 2956/05, 2957/05, 2958/05, 2959/05, 2960/05, 2961/05, 2962/05, 2963/05 & 2964/05 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Manoj Bhatt for Petitioner. Mr.Rajesh More, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DECEMBER 16, 2005. DECEMBER 16, 2005. DECEMBER 16, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. I see no reason to interfere with the discretionary order passed by the : 2 : Court below for granting interim protection to the Petitioner during the pendency of the Appeal. Hence, dismissed. 2. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that there are in all twenty cases and the Petitioner will have to deposit cost in the like amount in all those cases, which will be beyond the capacity of the Petitioner, as presently advised. 3. If it is so, it will be open to the Petitioner to approach the Appellate Court for providing further time for deposit. If such application is filed, the same be considered on its own merits. 4. It is made clear that the order which is impugned in these Petitions requiring the Petitioner to deposit sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty : 3 : Thousand) towards part-payment of amount of compensation is upheld. 5. Petitioner not to be arrested for a period of two weeks from today to enable the Petitioner to approach the Appellate Court for necessary relief, as may be advised. 6. Petitions disposed of on the above terms. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.