IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P. N0. 17/3/2004 PETITIONERS .••^ ^ \9m\Jy9w^'' •• v<» ~^ .•«<•' v -^^ <?-' ^*" '^ ^ ^^^ c^ 1) Ram Garib Tripathi, aged about 36 years, Daduyya Prasad Tripathi, Constable Batch No. 680, posted at Police Station Errabore, Tahsil Konta, Distt. Dantewada (C.G.) 2) Jamuna, Prasad Mishra, aged about 32 years, S/o. Shri Ram Suhavan Mishra, Constable Batch No.669, postedat Police Station, Konta, Distt. Dantewada (C.G.) 3) Aniruddha Kumar Choubey, aged 42 years, S/o. Late Shri Shrawan Kumar 'Choubcy, Head Constable, Batch No. 718, Posted at Police Station Bheji, Distt. Dantewada (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1) Union of India, through Secretary, Department of Personnel/Public Grievance, third Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi. 2) State of Madhya Pradesh, through Secretary, Department of home Affairs, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopat (M.P.) 3) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 4) Director General of police, State of Chhattisgarh, Police Head Quarters, Raipur (C.G.) i7?iISS^£3B 5) Inspector General of Police, (Personnel) Police Head Quarters, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 6) Superintendent of Police, District Dantewada (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 /227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. FOR ISSUNCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS / ORDERS AND DIRECTION XI-HC-22 ^TT^T'aFT ^Jch ^^ 5h+iicti <iT^a '3"^ ^Nld<4, ^Tli^^Ko, IG)l<rtl<l^ ^If~:^JZ'^^ 'fN^^T' WRCfIT^^I<=h 3n^T ^^ffS[R ^ftn 5 petitioners. >vt. Standing Counsel for Union of 07.07.2004 Shri S.S. Rajput, counsel for t4< Shri Vinay Harit, Sr. Central C^. India/respondent no. 1 on advance co| Shri Akhil Agrawal, Panel Lawjfer for the State/respondents no. 3 to 6 on advance copy. I.A. No. 4094/2004 for urgent Heard. Counsel for the petitioners s^ allocation of petitioners. He further W.P.No.578/2004 (Balendra Shekhar India and others) orders have been ps He also produced a copy of the ord( 1590/2004 (Oajiesh Prasad Choukse others) Leamed counsel prays that case also. Having considered the facts material on record and in view of th< further the legal poaition, the actio: relieving the petitioners cannot be entitled for relieving. The respo: petitioners within 15 days froni the d^.te of production of a copy of this order. Accordingly, this petition stand Consequently, M.W.P. 1534/20( C.C, as perrules. <=hl^fd41r1 -Hl^dt* ^ f^t <RI^I< i:r-3ri^p:r3?n^T earihg is allowed. ibmits that the matter relates to $ubmits that in similar matter i.e,, Mishra and others -vs- Union of \ssed by this Court on 17; 12.2003. dated 18.6.2004 passed in W.P. land others -vs- Union of India and ^imilar order may be passed in this and circuinstances of the case, judgment/orders cited above and of the State Authorities in not (ustained and the petitioners are ^ents are directed to relieve the ^ disposed of. }4 also stands disposed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ['qt^^T^