IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16180 of 2009 1. VIRENDRA KUMAR NIRJHAR @ VIRENDRA KUMAR S/O SRI RAGBUNATH PRASAD R/O VILL.- PASRAILA, P.S.- RAJAULI, DISTT.- NAWADA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR NAWADA 3. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER NAWADA 4. THE DIRECTOR, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ PATNA, BIHAR 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER RAJAULI, DISTT.- NAWADA, BIHAR 6. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ LENGURA, P.O.- TARGIR, DISTT.- NAWADA, BIHAR 7. MAHESH PRASAD @ MAHENDRA PRASAD S/O LATE JAGAN PRASAD R/O VILL.- DHAMAUL, P.O.- TARGIR, DISTT.- NAWADA, BIHAR ----------- 2/ 05/01/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner questions the appointment of respondent No.7 on the post of Panchayat Sevak, Gram Panchayat, Lingura While respondent No.7 was at Serial No.1 of the merit panel, the petitioner was at Serial No.2. The allegations are of a fraudulent appointment obtained with the help of fabricated certificates. It appears from Annexure-4 to the writ application that the allegations are already receiving the attention of the authorities and an enquiry has been initiated. Let such enquiry be concluded 2 expeditiously in accordance with law when naturally respondent No.7 has also to be heard adequately along with the petitioner and others and let final appropriate orders be passed within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The petitioner appears to have pursued the matter during the life of the panel. If the respondents arrive at the conclusion adverse to respondent No.7, naturally they are required to consider the case of the petitioner for such appointment in accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)