' Hon ble Smgle Bench w — HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR iamg e 3am! W PETITION NO /2010 RFVIE JNIKANT P S/o Late Shri. R.‘S.Prasa Aged at present about' 44 Years, Employed as Washerman 1n V CISF BIOP Depot 4 Klrandol D1stt Dantewada (CG) v Presently posted at CISF Unlt SECI KUSMUNDA VDlstt Korba (CG . " Union of India, Thru Th Srar, 1n1 of Home, . N Bloc he Dirtor T ec, entr In curty orc (Miry ofHOe Affrs ' l3, C Cpe, . dhi Rod NEW DELHI3 Lo a - ' The Du Insp Geral I Srty Fore ’ RSPOND-ENTS , E epty ector en Central ndustrlal ecul c ' st one, Hdua Ea Z eaqrters PATNA 1 (B) — 3 ihar / The r. mandnt, ' S Coma Cal dustrial Siy o, entr In ecurt Frce nt-NALC t. raut rs ’ ' T As Cand . he sistant ommant, Cntra ndUstrir’Secrit F, el Ialuy orce nit—BIOP Dot- - 945 _ isrict : Dantada CG INTIIE / RASAD d ) ' ‘ PETITIONER ogh e ecety Mstry orth k NEW DELHI Cal duStrial Sei Fe nist In ai) GO omlx UiO DAMANJODI Dis Kop (Oisa) U ep14; KIRANDULe 456 Dt ew () ENT D REVIEW PETITION FOR REVIEWING THE JUDGM ATED 19 08 2010 PASSED IN W P 1S! 4193 / 2007 ‘ <}‘V HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHRI MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA J. Review Petition No. 110/2010 PETITIONER R'ajnikant Prasad Versus RESPONDENTS “\k Union of India 85 Ors. Appearance: Shri B.P. Rao, counsel for the petitioner. \J ORAL- ORDER (Passed on 22.09.2010) Heard. 2. This review petition has been filed against the order dated 19th August, 2010 by which Writ Petition No.4193/2007 filed by the petitioner has 'been dismissed holding that there was no illegality, arbitrariness or discrimination on the part of respondent in rejecting petitioner’s application which was received late in the office of DIG, CISF East Zone, Patna, who was authorized to receive the application form. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the applications of departmental candidates were required to be submitted in their respective local ofiices and as the petitioner had submitted the application on 15.2.2007, the same should have been- treated to be substantial compliance of requirements of submission of application form bcfore the last date in the concerned offlce or DIG, CISF East Zone, Patna. After taking into consideration the scheme of the examination as published under the notification dated 13th January, 2007(Annexure P— 1), this Court has come to the conclusion that it was for the petitioner either to submit his application directly in the office of DIG, CISF, East Zone, Patna or if he wanted submission of his application through official channel, he wa§;»required to submit so well in advance as to reach in the office of DIG, CISF East Zone, Patna on or before 25.2.2007. In the opinion of this Court, no case for review of the order on well settled principles with regard to review is made out. 5 The review petition is therefore dismissed. i 3di- Manindra Mchan Shrivastava Judge .