HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILAsPUR W.P. (S) No. 682(2007 PETITIONER Deepak Kumar Shrivastava, S/ o Late Shri B.M. Shrivastava, Aged about 52 years, Dismict Prosecution Dfflcer’ Durg (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhattisgarh 86 Others Through ~ The Secretary, Home Department, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) N.N. Chatmvedi, Disttict Prosecution OiEcer, Dantewada, D.P.O. (mice Dantewada (C.G.) 3. R.K.S. Thakur, District Prosecution O$cer, Raipur, D,P.O. OEce Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance; Shn' Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh, Govt. Advocate for the , i State] respondent No. 1. None for respondent N02. Shri RK. Kesharwani, Counsel for Iespondent No.3. ORAL ORDER (21.09.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J LA. No.4: Heard. This is an application for withdrawal of the petition with a liberty to make representation. This application is opposed by learned counsel for respondent No.3 on the ground that respondent No.3 has already joined at the transferred place. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 submits that so far as withdrawal of the petition is concerned, he has no objection, but if the liberty is granted by the Court that may create complications in future, because respondent No.3 has joined. ,. / 2 , WP. (S) No‘582i2oo7 B€ that as it may, hen thc petitioner is praying for mthdrawal of the peuuon snnply w1tl1 hberty i0 $6 a representauon, the same WLII not &ect the legal nghts oi any person, wh1ch has accrued 111 ms favour 1n accordance w1th I do not find any substance in the objection raised by learned counsel for respondent No.3. withdraWn with the aforesaid ‘ law. The application is allowed. The petition is disposed of as liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge r: ‘