IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49472 of 2008 1. LALIT KUMAR MISHRA @ LALIT MISHRA S/O PHIRAN MISHRA 2. SRI NARAYAN MAHTO S/O LATE MAHABIR MAHTO ( BOTH R/O VILL. PIPRAUN, P.S. HARLAKHI, DIST. MADHUBANI) --- PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR -- OPP. PARTY. ----------- For the petitioners: Mr.N.K.Agrawal, Sr.Advocate. & Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the State: Mr. Dinesh Singh, APP. 04. 23.04.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioners, who are named accuseds, have approached this court for grant of anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Sections 364/34 of the Penal Code. The submissions advanced before this court is that the only evidence available against them is/are that these petitioners along with one another co-accused had taken the deceased to nearby country (Nepal). A few days thereafter, the dead-body of the victim was found, whereafter, the informant (father of the victim/deceased) lodged the present case alleging therein that the niece of the petitioner no.1 was having love affairs with his son, as a result whereof, the present occurrence has been committed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the father of the girl with whom the deceased was in love affairs has since been released on anticipatory bail. This court on perusal of the records including the 2 impugned order, finds that the accusations against the petitioner have been supported by the witnesses at the investigation. Having regard to the said fact, this court is not inclined to extend them the privilege of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the application seeking anticipatory bail stands rejected. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)