THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR DATED: 19-05-2010 WRIT APPEAL No. 379 OF 2010 Between: Bathuva Gram Panchayat, Bathuva, G. Sigadam Mandal, Srikakulam District, rep., by its Sarpanch Smt. Pallada Suridamma, W/o. P. Sanyasa Rao, r/o. Bathuva, G. Sigdam Mandal, Srikakulam District ..... APPELLANT AND District Collector, Srikakulam District, Srikakulam and three others .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 379 OF 2010 ORDER: (per Sri B. Seshasayana Reddy, J) This writ appeal has been directed against the order dated 22- 04-2010 passed in Writ Petition No. 9140 of 2010, which reads as under: “Though the second respondent issued urgent notice on 18.02.2010 as admitted by the counsel for the petitioner, the same is not specifically challenged. Another order dated 28-02-2010 is challenged. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed.” The appellant is Bathuva Gram Panchayat, Bathuva, G. Sigadam Mandal, Srikakulam District. The second respondent issued urgent notice dated 18-02-2010 ordering the appellant to stop the auction of fishing rights in respect of Borapothuvani Cheruvu. The appellant filed the writ petition questioning notice dated 28-02-2010. The learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition as the appellant has not questioned urgent notice dated 18-02-2010. However, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that in the writ affidavit the appellant has mentioned the date of the impugned notice as 18-02-2010 but by mistake, in the prayer portion, the date is mentioned as 28-02-2010. The learned single Judge having considered the material brought on record came to the conclusion that the appellant – writ petitioner has not challenged the proceedings dated 18-02-2010. Such is the situation, we do not see any valid ground to entertain the writ appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. However, the appellant is at liberty to challenge the proceedings dated 18-02-2010 by filing a separate writ petition. The order passed in Writ Petition No.9140 of 2010 or in this writ appeal does not preclude the appellant from filing a fresh writ petition. B. SESHASAYANA REDDY, J B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J 19-05-2010 ks