w--- Xi:^;;-. ^& ^.iY. ^•P,[&BIQBJE<I slffS OAIgJ"<Iani<IHiW^HNasra TISB'IOONJO .roi'audo.y S.IBSA 09 inoqs psgBBiqB.JBd ilVj'nsnAi.HiSS^i°/At «WW1:wn"V'lMS't ini1 I^-^Q o) -9N iIOPf*9d; iPAt /.7 9<2;fe;/''/tndWaw~^a3ii£f5i3flT^o .Mffop E^iStiiltffi » rsomirsi uoiii?Bo maasT^iJo~amIn5D.!BJ •epil sssBa jsd sy .KBomis^llJ0 BJBinmuGd TWOUllJIISNO. -w s^ia -g-a'iiw d) -1331"81 jssmSsg IUB}SISSV"Z :Wi1S AJE-13-I3SS ^' VSnQSff P-IEOQ Al3I433(3'd'WT PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 7f—. & HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARM : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.6048 OF 2000 Smt. Amina Farishta Versus M.P. Electricity Board & Another (Writ Petition underArticle 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri P.R. Patankar, Advocate for the petitioner. ORDER (ORAU (Passed on this 14 day of November, 2011) 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pleads no instructions. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge