IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18737 of 2010 1. MALTI DEVI W/O AKAL YADAV @AKALU YADAV 2. RESHAMI DEVI W/O SRI SURESH YADAV 3. AKALU YADAV @ AKALU YADAV S/O LATE LOOTAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 01.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner nos. 1 and 3 are parents-in-law of the deceased, whereas the petitioner no. 2 is the second wife of the husband of the deceased whose marriage had taken place sixteen years ago and therefore, it is not a case under Section 304 B I.P.C., where presumption would be against in-laws of the deceased. Considering the same and that there is no specific overt act against them, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction 2 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Magadh University, P.S. case no. 6/2010, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)