1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION No. 1478/2011. Sajid Ahmad Abdul Rashid -VERSUS- The State of Maharashtra and others. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : 23.06.2011. Heard Shri P.C. Madkholkar, learned counsel for petitioner, Mrs. Dangre, learned Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Other respondents though served with the notice have chosen not to appear. We find substance in the contention of the learned counsel for petitioner, as the impugned order passed by the Scrutiny Committee dated 2 01.03.2011 is signed only by the Member Secretary/Research Officer. As per law, the consideration has to be by all three members. Hence, that order is quashed and set aside. Respondent no.2 Committee is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Petition is accordingly allowed. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Rgd