S71 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARI—I AT BILASPUR W§iT PETITION No. 727 6F 2004 PETITIONERS 1. MAS’I‘RAM, S] O SHRI AKBAR SAL AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS. JAIRAM, S/ O SHRI AKBAR SAL AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS. THE ABOVE NAMED PETITIONERS ARE RESIDENT . OF VILLAGE DUMARDIH, POST UDAIPUR, TAHSIL AMBIKAPUR, DISTRICT SURGUJA, (ca). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1 . 2. 3. O'l SANTRAM SIO SHRI AKBAR SAI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. STATE OF CH HA’I‘TISGARH, THROUGH TH E SECR ETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, D.K.s. BHAWAN, RAIPUR, (C.G.). CHHATTISGARH BOARD OF REVENUE, BILASPUR, (C.G.) THROUGH ITS SECRETARY. THE COLLECTOR, AMBIKAPUR, DISTRTCT SURGUJA, (C. G.) THE SUB DMSIONAL OFFICER, (REVENUE), AMBIKAPUR, DISTRICT SURGUJA, (CO). MULSAI, S/O SHRI SUNDER SAI 'RAJWAR‘ TILESHWAR, S/O SHRI MANJU RAJWAR. THE ABOVE NAMED RESPONDENT NO. 4 85 5 ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-DUMARDIH, TAHSIL AMBIKAPUR, DISTRICT SURGUJA, (CO). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. {SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, JJ Presentz- Shr‘i Rakesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, P.L. for the State/respondents No. 1, 3 $54. Shri Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate for the respondents No. 5 8a 6 None for the respondent No. 2. L».T ORAL- onnER (passed on 03/08/2011) 1. By this petition under ArticlE 227 of the Constitution of India petitioners have 26/ 12/ 2003 passed by Board of Revenue Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur (C.G.) challenged the legality and propn'ety of the order dated g/ in r€vision case N0. 3961A—23/Y6ar 2002-2003. Village Dumerdeeh Tahsil Ambikapur, Dismict Sarguja (C.G.). 2. Lemued counsal for the pati’rioners submits that Board of Revenue has reversed the order passed by Collector on the ground that at the lime of passing of mt order dated 28/8/82 by Sub Divisional Oflicer, Ambikapur in revenue case No. 107/A—23/81—82 was in existence therefore he seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to hie appropriate appeal or review against the order dated 28/ 8/82 passed by Sub Divisional Ohicer, Ambikapur. 3. Prayer allowed. Consequently, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty available under the law. No order as to costs. V sd/_ T.P Shanna ‘ Judge %!4