{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5087 OF 2004 S.K.Services Aurangabad. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & 2 others. RESPONDENTS. *** Shri R.V.Ghuge, advocate for the petitioner Shri S.K.Tambe, AGP for the State. Shri R.P.Pawar, advocate for respondent no.2. *** Coram : NARESH H. PATIL,J. N.D.DESHPANDE, J. Date: 11th June 2009. P.C.: 01- The learned counsel Shri Ghuge submits that the impugned communication would adversely affect the petitioners who are entitled to be engaged in the work of loading and unloading. Learned counsel Shri Pawar submits that the petitioner has no cause of action as of now to challenge the impugned order and the communication issued by the Board to the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. The petition is filed in the year 2004. Due to efflux of time we find it inappropriate to deal with the issues raised in the {2} petition. In case the petitioner is aggrieved in future, the petitioner can resort to appropriate remedy. The petition is dismissed. [N.D.DESHPANDE] [NARESH H.PATIL] JUDGE JUDGE. /mda/0609/wp5087.04