IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2624 of 2009 SUSHIL JHA Versus JITENDRA JHA & ORS ----------- 04/ 17.02.2010 This petition has been filed for restoration of Civil Review no.258 of 2007 which was dismissed as not pressed on 20.11.2008. From order dated 20.11.2008 it appears that the counsel for the petitioner of Civil Review no. 258 of 2007 had specifically stated before this court that he had no instruction in the matter as the client had also taken away the file. Although learned counsel for the petitioner raises the said point but it is quite apparent that on the date when the said Civil review was taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner had no instruction. Furthermore, the petitioner had no business to take away the file as said Civil Review was pending. In the said circumstances, submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner on 20.11.2008 was quite justified and Civil Review was rightly dismissed by this court. In the said circumstances, this Court does not find any merit in this MJC petition which is accordingly dismissed. shahid (S. N. Hussain, J)