IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13061 of 2007 NIBHA KUMARI wife of Arbind Yadav, of village Balhampur, P. O. & P. S. Balhampur, Distt. Saharsa. … Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Ministry of Family Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Collector –cum- District Magistrate, Distt. Saharsa. 4. Distt. Welfare Officer, Distt. Saharsa. 5. Child Development Project Officer, Block Simri Bakhtiayarpur, Distt. Saharsa. 6. Block Development Officer, Block Simri Bakhtiyarpur, Distt. Saharsa. 7. Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj, Raipura, Block Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District Saharsa. 8. Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Raipara, Block Simiri Bakhtiyarpur, Distt. Saharsa. 9. Rekha Kumari wife of Kumar Bijay Raj @ Bijay Kumar of village Balhampur, P. O. P. S. Bakhtiyarpur, Distt. Saharsa. … Respondents. ----------- 2. 18.12.2009. Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “a) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or writs, direction or directions commanding upon the respondents authorities to select the petitioner for the post of Anganbari Sevika of Anganbari Centre. Thakur Tola Balhampur of Gram Panchayat Raj Raipura after cancelling the selection of respondent no. 9 who has wrongly been selected as Anganbari Sevika as the respondent no. 9 is not from the Poshak Kshetra of the said Anganbari Centre which is mandatory for the appointment of Sevika.” With reference to the aforementioned 2 reliefs, counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner intends to move the Collector of the District by filing a compact representation. In the opinion of this court, recourse chosen by the petitioner seems to be correct inasmuch as the scheme for appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika itself envisages the redressal of grievance pertaining to selection/appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika in the first instance by the Collector of the District. That being so, this court would give liberty to the petitioner to file a compact representation which, if filed along with this order, will be disposed within the time limit fixed by the State Government in the Circular dated 10.12.2009 by a reasoned order after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, respondent no. 9 and the representative of concerned gram panchayat. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)