IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2008 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1748 of 2008(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.7592/2008 Dated 19/03/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.V.RAMACHANDRAN, S/O.EDADAN PUTHIYA VEETTIL GOVINDAN NAIR(DIED) PO.EDAT, VIA PAYYANNUR, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.AMARESAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- LAKSHMIKUTTY, SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, KANNUR. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,J. ------------------------ C.O.C.1748/2008 IN W.P.(C)No.7592 OF 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of December, 2008 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent has not been requested by letter or otherwise to comply with the directions in Annexure-I judgment. But the learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that even in the absence of any such letter, the respondent was bound to comply with the directions in the judgment. I am not impressed. The contempt of court case will stand closed as premature. (PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE) dpk