IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13961 of 2008 1. SK.ABDUL HAI S/O SK. JIMDAR, 2. SK. JIMDAR S/O LATE SK. MD. SAHID, Both Residents of Village-Lanagri P.S. Mainatard, District-West Champaran, Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. BHIKHAM RAM S/O LATE RAMESHWAR RAM, R/O VILLAGE LANAGRI, P.S. MAINATARD, DISTRICT-WEST CHAMPARAN ----------- /2/ 07.12.2010 The petitioners have challenged the order dated 15.02.2008 passed by the learned Special Judge, Bettiah, West Champaran in Trial No. 26/99, whereby the petitioners’ application for recall of PWs- 1 to 4 has been rejected. It appears from the recall petition as contained in Annexure: 2 that the reason for recall has been mentioned as the witnesses have not been fully cross- examined and certain questions have been left to be asked. The impugned order reflects that the examination and cross- examination was completed in 23.09.2007, whereas the application for recall was filed in 2007. It appears that the recall petition further stipulates the reason for recall as the matter has been compromised between the parties. Since the application under Section 311 of the Indian Penal Code was filed after one and half year of the examination and cross-examination of the witnesses, without specifying the reason for recall. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. This application stands dismissed. Safik (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)