IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 60 of 2002 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 19.9.2001 in WP NO : 14648 OF 1992 on the file of the High Court.) Between: The Divisional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Srikakulam. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Rep. by its Presiding Officer, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2 The Regional Transport Authority, Rep. by its Secretary, Srikakulam. 3 K.Rama Rao, Private Operator, Srikakulam. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.K.HARINATH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR TRANSPORT Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Mr. T. Venkata Ramana The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 60 of 2002 ORAL JUDGMENT: Learned Standing Counsel for the appellant-Corporation submits that the writ appeal has become infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. ___________________ T.MEENA KUMARI,J Date: 17th June, 2009 _________________ SANJAY KUMAR,J pnb