1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY APPLICATION NO.670 OF 2009 In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956); AND In the matter of Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956; AND In the matter of Scheme of Arrangement between Saawariyaa Properties Private Limited (‘Demerged Company’)And You and Me Trading Private Limited (Resulting Company’) And their respective Shareholders. YOU AND ME TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and having its registered office at 305, Swasthik Society, Road No. 3, Juhu Scheme, Vile Parle (w), Mumbai 400 049 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ..Applicant Company Called for Summons for Directions Coram: A.M. Khanwilkar J Date : 19th day of June, 2009 Mr. Hemant Sethi i/b. Hemant Sethi & Co., for Applicant Company 2 MINUTES OF ORDER UPON the application of the Applicant Company abovenamed by a Summons for Directions AND UPON HEARING Mr. Hemant Sethi instructed by Hemant Sethi & Co., Advocates for the Applicant Company, AND UPON READING the Affidavit dated 11th day of June, 2009 of Mr. T.V. Dwarkanath, Constituted Power of Attorney Holder of Mr. K. Suri Babu, the Director of the Applicant Company, in support of Summons for Directions, IT IS ORDERED: 1. That convening and holding the meeting of the Equity Shareholders of YOU AND ME TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED, the Applicant Company, for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, approving, with or without modification(s), the arrangement embodied in the proposed Scheme of Arrangement between Saawariyaa Properties Private Limited, Demerged Company and You and Me Trading Private Limited, Resulting Company and their respective Shareholders is dispensed with in view of consents given by all the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company which are annexed as Exhibits H1 & H2 to the affidavit in support of the Summons for Directions. 3 2. There are no Secured Creditors in the Applicant Company as mentioned in paragraph sixteen of the affidavit in support of the Summons for Directions, hence, the question of convening and holding of the meeting of Secured Creditors does not arise. 3. There are no Unsecured Creditors in the Applicant Company as mentioned in paragraph seventeen of the affidavit in support of the Summons for Directions, hence, the question of convening and holding of the meeting of Unsecured Creditors does not arise. COMPANY JUDGE