IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12778 of 2011 DIGAMBAR PRASAD YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 27.04.2011 This application has been brought under the heading of “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of the petitioner. It has been submitted that in order dated 18.04.2011 in the third line of third paragraph of the order due to typographical error “He was merely present and in course of raid he has been roped in” was typed. It should have been typed as “That the petitioner was not present and another person was present”. The order dated 18.04.2011 is modified to the extent that in the third line of third paragraph of the order it shall be deemed to have been read as “That the petitioner was not present and another person was present”. Thus, this petition is allowed. kksinha/- (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)