1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O.NO.538 OF 2010 IN M.C.A.ST.NO.5847 OF 2010 IN F.A.NO.4 OF 2000. Shankarrao Sitaramji Pande and ors. .vs. Charity Commissioner and others. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.V.S.Kukday Adv. for the appellants. Smt.Wasnik Adv. for the respondnets. C ORAM : C.L.Pangarkar, J. DATED : 23rd April, 2010. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the respondents. These applications have been filed for condonation of the delay in preferring the restoration application and for restoration of the appeal. The appeal preferred by the appellants came to be dismissed for default on 11/12/2009. It is stated in the applications that the counsel could not appear in the said matter on that date since the board did not display his name. The appellant came to know of dismissal of the appeal in the last week of March. The applications have been filed thereafter within limitation. The copies of the 2 applications have been delivered to the learned counsel for the respondents The respondents have not filed reply to the applications. In view of this, it appears that the respondents have no objection the appeal being restored to file. The delay stands condoned. The appeal is restored to file. The application for substitution of the legal representatives of respondent nos. 2 and 4 be filed in main application so that their heirs can be brought in the said appeal and not in this application. Office to list this application separately for bringing legal representatives on record in appeal. JUDGE. chute