IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5126 of 2008 Ram Naresh Pathak, Son of Late Mathura Prasad Pathak, resident of Village- + P.O. Usri, P.S. Mehandia, District-Arwal ------------------------ Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Collector, Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad 2. The Accountant General,Bihar,Patna 3. The Director, General Provident Fund Directorate, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road,Patna 4. The District Provident Fund Officer, Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad 5. T he District Panchayat Raj Officer, Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad 6. The Block Development Officer, Jehanabad, District-Jehanabad -------------------------------- Respondents. ---------------------------------- 03 29-08-2011 Heard Sri Ghanshyam Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Basant Vikash , learned A.C. to Standing Counsel no.15, who appears on behalf of Respondent nos.1and 3to 6 and Sri Vivekanand Kunwar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent no.2/ Accountant General,Bihar,Patna. The present writ petition was initially filed with a prayer to direct the Respondents to make payment of entire amount of G.P.F. with statutory interest. In this case, counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Respondent/State and it has been stated that entire amount of G.P.F. along with admissible interest has already been paid to the petitioner. The petitioner, thereafter, has filed a rejoinder to the counter affidavit and in paragraph-4 of the rejoinder to the counter affidavit it has been stated that there were some error in the calculation chart and even the amount of Rs.758/- was not taken into 2 account. The petitioner in its rejoinder has also stated that he has filed a representation for such claim before the District Provident Fund Officer, Jehanabad. In view of the fact that almost all the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed, there is no need to keep the matter further pending. However, in view of the fact that for some claim i.e. error of calculation and left over amount the petitioner has filed representation before Respondent no.4/ District Provident Fund Officer, Jehanabad, the Court expects that Respondent no.2 will examine the representation of the petitioner as contained in Annexure-2 to the rejoinder petition in its right perspective and take final decision preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)