I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUHECATURE QT J B§LFU, WRIT PETITI$N NB. H’f 4‘@ BF 1998 ”W ?ETITIDN UNDER ARTICLES 285/22? BF THE CQNSTITUTIDN aF INDIA DnNuSingh, amn of Late RuNnSinghy aged abnut $2 year§, Uacu§§£inm Chie? Mining Engineer ($&R), I$Uy $auth EagtePn $oal¥i&ld% Limited, Hwad $$1¢&, 5&apat R0a&, BELQSPUR. .‘u..nRET1TIQNER VERSUS 1. Unia 0? ihdia thraugh thm $ecvatary a? Indié, MgHi§try (Cnal), GnvernmQnt a¥ é§&l, NEH DELHI. R‘ Chairman, Cmai xn Limitad, 10y Netaji $ubh&$h Ru&&7 CRLQUTTA ~ ?00 001 §ir§xtur (P&IR), §oal india Road, Limited BALCéT;Q 10 — Netaji ?OO OO1u $uhhash g 4, chad r‘man // ‘“" Cum "' Managing Eagiarn Cwal?ield$ timitad, $Eepat $0ad, BIL§SPUR « 495 6Qéu Sauth Diractur, . .. u . u . ‘ a . “ . REBPUNDENTE3 i“ Particulars u? xhe petitianer : $5 par thw cau§a iiil$ abuvan En Particularg 0f the reapondents 6 ih / HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 1476 of 1998 Petitioner D. N. Singh Versus Respondents Union of India and others Single Bench : Hon’blc Mr. Justice Satish K. Apihotri. None for the petitioner. None for the respondent No. 1. Shn' P. S. Koshy, Advocate for the respondents No. 2 to 4. ORAL ORDER (15th June, 2006) The following order of the Court was passed by Satish K. Aguihotri, J. 1. The matter is called for healing twice. On both the occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. 2. In View of the. above, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- satish K. Agnihotri Judge Bablu /