IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 14562 of 2009 Between: SMT.N.VEERA RAGHAVULU W/o. Sri .N.Satyanarayana Murthy 8-2-674/B/2/23A-15,C2 Land Mark Enclave Happy Valley Road No 13- A Happy Vally,Banjara Hills,Hyderabad-34 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt of A.P rep.by its Principal Secretary,Revenue Department Secretariat,Hyderabad 2 The Joint Collector Ranga Reddy District 177,Khairatabad,Hyderabad 3 The Special Grade Deputy Collector and Revenue Divsional Officer Chevella Division R.R District 4 The Deputy Collector & Tahsildar Serilingampally (M) R.R District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not granting Stay pending the Revision filed by the petitioner under section 4(B) of A.P Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act 1977 and further direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner pending Revision by suspending the order of the 4th respondent in proceedings No B/2545/2006 dated 16-1-2004 as confirmed by the 3rd respondent& 2nd respondents in Proceedings bearing Lr No D/10/2006 dated 15-07-2006 and case No E1/1506/2007 dated 17-7-2007 Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.V.DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO.14562 OF 2009 ORAL ORDER On 16-01-2004 the 4th respondent passed an order under Section.4 of the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 (for short “the Act”) holding the petitioner to be the purchaser of assigned lands whose alienation is prohibited and directing her eviction. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred an appeal to the 3rd respondent, which was dismissed on 15-07-2006. There against, she preferred a further appeal under Section.4-A of the Act to the 2nd respondent, which was also dismissed on 17-07-2007. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred a revision to the 1st respondent under Section 4-B of the Act on 25-11- 2007 and along therewith an application for interim relief of suspension of the primary order. The petitioner’s grievance is that the 1st respondent has neither disposed of the revision nor the application for interim relief therein preferred, as early as on 25.11.2007. In the facts and circumstances of the case after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignment) the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission directing the 1st respondent to expeditiously and in any event within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order consider and dispose of the revision preferred by the petitioner on 25-11-2007 against the appellate order of the 2nd respondent dated.17-07-2007. The 1st respondent shall record reasons for the appellate decision and shall communicate the revisional order to the petitioner after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. No costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 21st JULY 2009 *TSNR