IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 15TH MAGHA 1929 W.P.(C).No. 3740 of 2008(T) --------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- V.C.PHILIP, VATTAKUNNEL HOUSE, MANGANAM P.O., KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.A.INEES RESPONDENT: --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM. BY SRI. GOVT. PLEADER, SRI.C.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT: 1) EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE HON: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA IN SLPNO.22797/2001 DATED 18.01.2002. 2) EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY GOVERNMENT OF KERALA DATED 9.5.07. 3) EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DATED 23.03.2007. 4) EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DATED 3.4.2007. 5) EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DATED 27.04.2007. 6) EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DATED 04.08.2007. 7) EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON: HIGH COURT IN W.P.(C) NO.27632/07, DATED 3.10.2007. 8) EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN M.V.A.A.NO.758/2007 DATED 8.1.2008. 9) EXT.P9: TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER SUBMITTED ALONG WITH EXT.P8 JUDGMENT, DATED 14.1.2008. // T R U E C O P Y // PA TO JUDGE Rp/- ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =================== W.P.(C) NO. 3740 OF 2008 T =========================== Dated this the 4 th day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T The prayer in this writ petition is essentially for implementation of Ext.P8. Petitioner submits that by Ext.P7, this court had directed the respondent to pass orders on an application made by the petitioner for temporary permit. Accordingly, order was passed rejecting the application, against which, petitioner moved the STAT by filing MVAA No.758/07. The STAT disposed of the appeal by Ext.P8 judgment allowing the appeal filed by the petitioner and directing the respondent to grant temporary permit, under Section 87(1)(d) of the M.V Act. The complaint of the petitioner is that although this judgment dated 8/1/08 was produced before the respondent on 14/1/08, temporary permit has not been issued till date. 2. Now that STAT has allowed the appeal as per Ext.P8 WPC 3740/08 :2 : judgment, I do not find any justification for delay on the part of the respondent in implementing the direction of the STAT. Therefore, I direct that Ext.P8 judgment shall be implemented by the respondent forthwith on production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp