-^- IN THEfl;Oa!rBlAHICi«GOURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BHiASPUR WRITPETmON (Sl No. v /2010 PfiTITIONERS •'•^^^ ^'^^ 2^^ ><sa RESPONDENTS: 1. Ramgopal Kashyap S/o Shri Khikram Kashyap, aged about 55 Years, occupation Lecturer, in Govt. Higher Secondary School Beharchuwa Block Kartala, Distt. Korba (C.G.) ^ KalarMn Bag^ S/o Shri Jani Ram Baghel, aged about 53 Years, occupation Head Master, in Govt. Middle Schobl Pahadgaon Block Kartala, Distt. Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1.' State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Deportment D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, ^e.G.) 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Raipur District Raipur .(C-G.) 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Deportment, Korba District Korba (C.G.) WRJT UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ,tf^Kte^tri1iWt«l4Eteian irt!iKt^cawSi.-s> "* C-22 311^1 ^iT h-U'h 3^f a?*iicti^t3 ^ 'yst ^WvPf, ^•yilti. iqcii'My WHWI (hllch a'n^T xr;ra? ^...^£^.a>..i...6^^^/^ 1^^[' 311^51 TOIRR ^fCT SB : HOS'BLE MR. JU8TICB PRfHNKBR DIWAKBR 04.12.2010 Shri Ajay Kumar Barek, Shri A.V.Shridhar, P.L. for coitmsel for the petitioners. fhe State. Grievaace ofthe petitioner^ the petitioners were appoiated a^ pay scale of Rs. 100-150 for a coiapletion of probation, fhey we^e Rs. 169-300. ia fhe pieseat petition is that Assistant Teachers on a fixcd Iperiod of two years and afiter granted regular pay scale of ctase Contention offhe couiis&l are entifled for regular pay scal^ initial appoiatment and their number of decisfons passed judgment rendered by fhe M.P. Jabalpur ia OJl. No. 2743/89 Vs. State of M.P. 8s Others) suiularly placed teachers are tfae date offheir uutial appoiatai^nt It is not disputed by both taken up by fhe State to the Ape^ disnussed by the Apex Court Tribunal to fhe effect fhat the entitled for regular pay scale appoin.tuient. . • cnl<iTd<i1Ti ^iH<nf "^ 1^%t <r3i-^i< ^r arfigq an^i [for the petitioners is that they with e£Fect fix>in. the date of is squarety covered with 1py this Court and also fhe IState Administrative Tribunal, (^ladhnkant Yadu & 56 Others ifrherein it has beeu held that for regular pay scale fioin enttfled fhe parties fhat tbe inatter was Court but the appeal was also ^iphoMiag the decision of the T^achers/Assistant Teachers are tfom fhe date of fheir initial In view of fhe above subn^ission niade by the counsel for Jiie pardes, fhe petitioD. is disposed ofia the same terms iSffi^Wen ||(»)IWIi1ll -HC-22 31)^1 qil l<")i?h 3TI^?I '^'RW^ft^ -S^ •^nqf^pT, •®:(ftH4®.R«1^1< sn^r xRra? *ll*l<tl •g^qjq;"—"———•—•—————'g^ 200 IN^y sil^l •^giWdiCT stdnd petitioners are grantcd liberty tc) advised, in the l^ht of the afore^: dated 27.12.2008 and in tum,i directed to consider fheir case perspective. If the petitioners order passed by the State Admin^! Yadu (supra) and subsequenfht Court in. Special Leave Petition dated 3.1.1995, fhe petitioners accordingty. make a representation, If so jaid judgiaent aud fhe circular the concemed respondent is |on its own uierits and ia its on the same footing as per ilstrate Tribuaal in Madhiikaat coiafiined by the Supreiae l(CivU) No. 6892/93 by oider taay be entitted to sam.e relicf It is expected fi-oia fhe steife authorities to pass suitable order after due scrutiny offhe fa<jts. It is inade clear fhat fhis opuuon on raerits of tfae casc would be at Uberty to decide accordance wifti ]aw. <^Jtrt14tTI 'RFl^ ^ fet:3t ^•^.l^ ^affrosil^r Court has aot expressed any and the aufhority concemed fhe representation strietly ia Sd/- -. Pritinker Diwakar Judge •vi,'eTKTi Rll