IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE fCRIMINALl N0. . ^ I 120oS HON'BLE DIVISON BENCH PET1TIONER v\\'\.^-'^ C? \.b^ . . . ^,'^-'^>^ Vi ' ,.-•-' ' <-• IN REF. :- CONTEMNERS JAI MA BHAWANI SAMITI GAUSHALA Through : President Devendra Kumar Pandey, Out-Post- Urga, District - Korba (C.G.) VERSUS -• • • -^' A •^y^ .vC/^ 2. v SHRI G.K; MISHRA Additionat Sessions Judge KORBA, Tahsil and District Korba (C.G.) SHIV CHARAN Aged 39 years S/o. Shri Abhiram Gautam R/o. Village- Khod, Police-Station Akaltara, District - Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTION 1^0F THE CONTEMPT OF COURT. 1971 TO INITIATE SUO-IVIOTU CONTEMPT PROCEED1 N G S €^p" ?5 '^ XI-HC-22 ^Tii^T^T ^TT^^TI^T $?)^T^)<TOCT 5^W^ 3^^l^l<rt^, ^^1?, Rcrll^^ 3ll^iu^ch ^' ^Jk^^.<l^NC-<.200 ^l^ctl ^w^. /6<> ^*»»^iUJkL-i^ »^^-^ ^ ^'^».^^»»»».» i^S ^TI^T ^RTRK ^ETf^T ommQQi Shri V.G. TamaskarJ None for contemnorsl <=r>i^Tcn<fl<i ^i^<nT^:te^' <f^t^« ^^^T^TT^T Counsel for the petitloner. Shri A.S. Kachhawaita, Govt, Advocate for the State, No.1 and2. Heard, In Crime No. 14/2006 under Sections 4, 6, 10 & 11 of the Chhattisgarh : AgricuSturai ^attle Prevser^atlon Act, 1995, seventy-aix •agricuityral catttes selzed|..from;;the cu^ody of -Shiv^Charan,.(herej^ contemnor no.2 were give|i to custociy of the petstioner. Shiv Charan moved an appljcatlon for c^stody^those,anirriaS^;ori SuprudnaroB."orsy 1:7/04/2006 ;beft>re the Judi|slaJ;Nagistrate:|PirM:Ciass,. Korba, wfto vida:^ ^',' ;prd6F dafed 1122/04/2CN3©'•;rs|ected. the •same.:^^:;Fe@ljng; aggrisved,/ Shiv. Charan Itied a crlmina!:revi^ionbearingNo..'13/2006: before theCourt of -t;;1' .. ^ .. . !'' ..' •.11'1" Shri G.K. Mishra, AdcSitiona|i Sessions Judge, Korba (herein contemnor No.2) who vicie order dgjted 17/OS/20G6 allowed the revjsion and djrected to'. 'handover the .I'custody of ail those agrlcyityrat cattleB on f, . ^. . . ,: - .- :Syprydnarina to .S.hiv •Char|in. Shsv Charan fiied Syprydnama. •m the Court of Judicial Magistra^ rstuming those cattles to ^ Poiice Station Kartela nor Bhawanl Samiti adhered tol moved by Shiv Charan:: ir^ .Sessions Judge, Korba. an applicatlon before thls 0 ie First Class, Korba, who issued order for * . . - ;hiv Charan, butn©ither.R,P.Dwivedi, A.S.i, pevendra Kumar Pandey, PresidenA, Jai Ma » lit. 'Therefore, a contem|rf..petition .has been T : the Court of Shri G.K. .Mishra, AddltionaS In the; meantime, Jai Ma Bhawani Samiti through President'Devencir^-Kymar Pandey . (herein petstioner) moved t>urt under'Sectjon 482 of the Cr.P.C. r' XI-HC-22 N^T^)T f?HT^-3?l^T ^Hl<^^Tl^r ^ffw 7^'^ C^y 3^^Nl<rl^, ^Tft^l^^fi<riiti^^^ 3l<^t^?l<*» HW^I yhw^ -------»--.^.^ 200 ./ S^0<!& ^TI^T S^cTRK ^rf^cT in that proceedmg counsei for the pelltione in possesslon of the Detitloner b^ and the ordsr dated 17/05/2006 so far been executed, in vie impygned order-passed, by 'the . rernain stayed» "' When AdditloriaS Sessioni notice on R.P. Dwivedi a| Kurrsar Pandey opposeC:the^app| .hjm,wasl'that.lhe/Hi9h'Courtv(d^ ^execution.of the order- dafe^ Shn.G.K. Mishra, -Additiolnal- .objection^arici ^ passed^the'oNe^ t.liat'-Hjgft'.Court has stayed the ;<| . passed In Criniin'aS Revision'. No."] 'proceeding which is initiated, fo§1 subordinate Court and proceede| This contempt:' petltiop: Additio.n.al Sessloris' Jyde. -Shrj 0 . -by thss • Court in^a.^e^^ootem^ relying onih\ petftioner stayed the- revisionaS (| to. passing of the-.:ord.er- 'ciated-' G^ ';any orders :;ah^.: ose; order^'ha) ^person," .ihose.^ythorities or per| <=t'»i^T<vi<{1Ti ^i^<viT^tec^' <Ri«i< ^^f^T'STI^T |i.e.,under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C... •t- stated at Bar that ali the catttes given ^ the.Poiice are still jn ttieir'.possession Ipassed by the revisionai'Coy.rt" has not !W of that, thls Court directed that the revisional "Court oo 17/05/2006 shati ^JudQe,.l<4rba,|:ri^ontempt,pmcee^in^ fld Deven<|ya 'Kumar Pandey, Oeven^ra-' ^^^!3W^W .M^^Qfaw}d3 by' 1 orcler^als^Q^QI^DOS.has stayed.the 1^5/2006 paiss6cS^l3y;th©•revislonal Court.1 ^ssions, ,Judgs^;Korba, considered . the l.on 08/08/2006 wherelnhe has stated ^peration--Gf;the"-ord@r 'dated 17/05/2006. [3/2006. High Court has n©tstayed any disobedie'pce of orders passed by the P with 'contempf proceedings. jhas, fsled .00 ;• the ground that [X. .Mishra, has defied the order passed ttuous 'manner..'- Thfe Court vide order i^ statement of tearned Gounsel fer the Nurt's order dated 17/05/2006, but pnor 1/07/2006, It' Court beiows have passed ^e been dis-obeyed by any authori'ty or Isons.cannot take sheiter of this Court's XI-HC-22 ^^t^r^r R<rii*3TT^rr ^HW^rfN' a»-' & 3^? ^N IC1<(, ^Tltwi^ R<rttt<^< 3ll^lH5»Ct» T r^j^..tey^....t.U^ HIN^I 8W W^ 200 i^^' W^?T ?RTRR ^rf^cf order for the.ir wlllfui default Tht Sesslons Judge does not Court's order.' Therefore, 1 anf| Judge, Korba, .who ' has rvlisceiianeous Case No.4/200S, Shiv Charan. .Is, concemed, on before the .Addltional not bring^hlm wlthln the.edr| !n the-'resolt, the;::Defltio.ri dismissed.and Jsac^orcJ||gty;dls.| <=r>Nl<n<{1»i^H<^Tft fe^ <Ri^« ^^rf^T^n^T fe ludiclaS order passed.by theAddltJoriai to be any willfu! of thls of the view Additional .Sessions pa^sed , the order . on, m ^id not comnnit any^ontenipt. So far as |ils is Se^sions.<JUdge,:fi|jRSi.of'£Ontempt-pd:ltion |ice-M;contemnor;'.' 7c^,%®% .' -SK% K: •-' fii©d^,'^tiep©tjti©ii§r^is liable to^^be. tlISS!©^|^£. . ' •• i Sd/- V.K. Shrivatava Judge