IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.NO. ^IJ^ OF 2011 Si^^B^-Nfl APPLICANT RESPONDENTS [Non-applicants} '^ \ f^.%9^^ Smt. Chandrika Bai, widow of Late Jagdish Pandey, aged about 45 years, Resident of Champa, Tehsil: Champa, District: Janjgir Champa (C.G.) VERSUS 1) Smt. Champa Bai, widow of Late Jagdish Prasad Pandey, aged about 48 years; 2) Bharat Lal, son of Late Jagdish Prasad Pandey, aged about 25 years; Both are resident of village: Sonmuda, Sonkarpara, Raigarh, Tehsil & District- Raigarh (C.G.) 3) Sant Ram Pandey, son of Tuketa Ram Pandey, (Lolaram Pandey), aged about 69 years; resident of Sirgitti, police station: Bilaspur, Tehsil & District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4) Divisional Railway Manager, South Eastern Central Railway, Bilaspur, District-BJIaspur (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE CIVIL REVISION N0.26/2005.-PARTIES BEING "SMT. CHANDRIKA BAI ys. CHAMPA BAI & others" ^ ^IWCW (hH|c»» T^r ^i<4Kyi<4, ^>Ti1^li<o, r®idiy^< ^.X.-..C-.c,.H?.. -^ 200 3?n^?T ^^K (^3<^T) S.B:HON'BLEMR.JUSTICi 08,08.2011: Ms. Neha Verma, coun^el df Counsel for the petitiont The petitioner is No.26/2005 whteh was dismit dated 15.07.2011. On due consideration for the petitioner and the gro|unds am satisfied that the abst 15.07.2011 when Civil RevisKfrn was based on bona fide grourl M.C.C. No.496/2011, No.26/2005 is restored to jts di for the petitioner. ^r is heard on restoration applieation. s^eking restoration of Civil Revjsion ^sed for want of prosecutjon vide order <=hl^f<n<fll 'W^ ^f f^^ T^?R ^?-stRw 3Ti^?r N.K. AGARWAL the submission of the learned counsel taken in the restoration petition, 1 ^nce of the petitioner's counsel on No.26/2005 was taken-up for hearing 1ds. therefore, is ailowed and Civil Revision Iriginal number. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge