IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR cHHATTISGARH f/ WRIT PETITION No.3/ ZY/zoos // / PETITIONER : Rameshwar Prasad Kewarth, S/o. Motichand Kewarth, age? about 32 years, R/o. Village Kariatar, P.O. Purgaon, Block — Bhilajgarh, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS ESPONDENTS l; State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Distt. Rajpur. Chief Executive Officer, Jallpad Panchayat, Bhilaigarh, Distt. Raipur. Gram Panchayat, through Sarpanch} Village Kariatar, Block Bhilaigarh, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Dhaniram S/o. Lakhan Lal Sahu, age about 25 years, Panchayat Karmi of Gram Rampur, Gram Panchayat Kariatar Block Bhilaigarh, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) .J WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. R K 2 / XI—HC—78 HW,Wl§,W . bx} C 3 Imyo. mm 1H 20 0 WWGETW) mam WW mwmm mm#‘wm aswm 7 .8.2006 5hri Sandeep Dubey, Advc cafe for fhe pe'rifioner'. Shri 6. K. Beriwal, Dy. Advoca‘re General for respondem' No.1 & 2. None for- o'l'her responden rs. Heard. ‘Ti‘rioner has ques‘l'ioned *he !egali1‘y, proprie'fy and correctness of Th order dafed 13.10.2001 (Annexure P—2) whereby ‘lhe oppoim’men‘l’ of Th 6mm Panchayaf Kariafur has peTi‘Haner will nof be aliowed To Af fhe ou‘fse‘r, learned co .msel for The pe'ri‘rioner submi‘rs fha'r as far as fhe wifhdrawal of appoin'tmenf of fhe pe‘ri'rioner from The pos'r of Panchayaf Secrefary is concerned, he is no‘i chalienging The impugned order To fho'r ex'renf. The pef Tioner's main grievance is fha’r wifhou‘f holding regular enquiry as env saged under Rule 7 of ”the Panchoya‘l' Service (Discipline and Appeal) By this paifion +he p pe‘fi‘l’ioner on The pos‘r of Secremry, keen wifhdrnwn and direcfed Tha‘r fhe discharge fhe duTies of Panchoyh‘t Karmi. Rules, 1999 (for shor'r “Rules, 1999) ‘l’he pe‘l’i‘rioner cannof be removed or resfrained from discharging his dufies as Panchayaf Kormi. He furfher submifs fha'r even The pefi‘rioner is no? allowed ‘ro mark his presence pursuance of The order da'l’ed respondenf No.4 has submiffed from The posf of Pahchoyaf Kormi. and he has nof been paid salary in 1.3.10.2001, whereas, in Para-10 of reply ‘l'ha‘l’ fhe pefifioner was never ferminafed P.T.O. W n mw,m,m Wm ....................' . 1H 00 2 WW (W) Wamgfwm WWW mmwm / LP‘ §WWW WWW If is admiffed posi‘l’ion vfhm’ wi‘fhouf holding enquiry, as envisaged under Rule 7 cf The Rules, 1999 nP Punchayaf Karmi can be removed from i ‘l’he posf of Panchaya‘r Karmi uccordingly The impugned order dafed ‘ ‘13 10 2001 (Annexure P 2) 1'0 'rhe exfen‘l’ +haT The pe'l’i'l’ioner shall no? be allowed To work as Panchoym‘ Karmi is liable To be quashed and iT is hereby quashed The peTmon sTands disposed of. ConsequenTly, Mi(W.)P. No. disposed of. CerTified copy as per rules 2639/05 di I.A. No.6166/05 also sTand 1 ' 9’ Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.