IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 23172 of 2011 Date of decision December 13, 2011 Vishesh Kumar ....... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Notice of motion. 2. At the asking of the Court Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 3.. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-5) is considered and the life and liberty of the petitioner is protected. 4. As ordered. 5. The second respondent shall consider the representation (Annexure P-5) and take appropriate decision as per law and give proper protection to the petitioner if the situation so warrants. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 13 , 2011 archana