IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2595 of 2010 SANTOSH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate. For the State: Mr. Gopesh Kumar, A.P.P. ------------ 3 3.5.2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution for offence under section 307 and some other allied offences of the Indian Penal Code as also under section 27 of the Arms Act, it is submitted that petitioner is not named in the FIR as an accused. However, during the course of investigation some of the apprehended co-accused has named this petitioner also in their alleged confessional statement , but no specific role has been assigned against him for committing the crime in question. it is also submitted that the petitioner is a man of fair antecedent and there is no criminal history against him. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the above named petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Kesharia P.S. Case No. 38 of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down under section - 2 - 438(2) Cr.P.C. and subject to further condition: (a)That one of the bailors must be Govt. Servant or close family member of the petitioner who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J. ) M.Rahman