IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10461 OF 2004 Smt.Yadavar Padmal Krishan ... ...... Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors.. ... ... Respondents. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Office Notes, Office ) Court's or Judge's Orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Mrs.Poonam P. Bhosale, Adv. For the petitioner. Mr.R.M. Patne, AGP for the State. CORAM: V.G. PALSHIKAR AND D.B. BHOSALE, JJ. 25.8.2005. PC: By this petition the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Minister for rationing. The contention raised is that though the petitioner fulfilled all the conditions she has not been granted ration shop. 1 2. The reason for not granting ration shop is that the petitioner stood at priority No.8 whereas Mrs.Gandhi to whom it was initially alloted stood at priority No.1 and one Mrs.Lokhande who was at No.2 along with present petitioners approached the concerned Minister who considered the whole thing and set aside the allotment of Mrs.Gandhi and granted to Mrs.Lokhande. In such circumstances we see no reason to interfere because the priority of Mrs.Lokhande is higher than that of the petitioner. Hence petition dismissed. 25.8.05 2