IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52920 of 2008 UMESH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 24.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under sections 304(B), 147, 120(B) and 201/149 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is maternal uncle of Lakhan Yadav (husband of the deceased ). It is also stated that the informant has compromised the matter with said accused Lakhan Yadav and his father Gopal Yadav and there is also inordinate delay in the lodging of the case. He further submits that said Lakhan Yadav and his father Gopal Yadav have already been enlarged on bail by the learned court below itself. He also submits that no overt act has been alleged against the petitioner and there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. In case of surrender/arrest within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in the court below, the petitioner, namely, Umesh Uadav shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000.00( Rupees ten thousand ) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial 2 Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 63 of 2004, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )