_ _ ..‘,.*"_,.$:, N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5062 of2008 Petitioner Umesh Agrawal. aged about 4U yeam, S/o Shri Y. K. Tibmwal, R/o Indira Vihar, Sarkanda, Biiaspur, Distn'ct — Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, ThrOugh z Secretaly, Finance and Planning, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner, Treasury Accounts and Pension, Raipur (C.G.) Shankar Jha, OEce of Commissioner, Treasuly Accounts and Pension, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PE’l‘I'l‘ON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON§ITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shn' Sunjl Otwam‘, Advocate for the petin‘oner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondents. O R D E R (Passed on this 12th Day of September, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instrucn‘ons, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this matter on merits at this stage and seeks permission to withdraw this petih‘on with liberty to pursue the representation dated 11.7.2008 (Annexuie PIS), pending before the concerned authority. The concerned authority may be directed to consider and decide the representation in accordance with law Within a reasonable period. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents] State submits that the pending representation shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, Within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt ofa copy of this order. In View of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the afore-stated liberty. ‘ ’ r/x/Lr Sd/~ :‘Satish K. Agnihotri V ‘ Jildge Thakur I