IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14401 of 2011 Yogendra Yadav son of Late Gohal Yadav, Resident of village Karama, P.S. Puraini, District Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary cum Commissioner, Human Resource Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Regional Deputy Education Director, Koshi Division, Saharsa. 3. The District Magistrate, Madhepura. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Madhepura. 5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Uda Kishunganj, Madhepura. 6. The Sub-Divisional Educational Officer, Uda Kishunganj, Madhepura. 7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Uda Kishunganj, Madhepura. 8. District Provident Fund Officer, Madhepura. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 30.8.2011. A prayer has been made by Shri Achchelal Prasad, learned A.C. to S.C.10 for adjourning the case for four weeks for filing counter affidavit. The petitioner, who retired as Peon from the office of Sub-Divisional Education Officer, Udakishunganj, Madhepura with effect from 30.11.2009, has prayed for directing the respondents to pay all his retiral dues as well as his arrear of salary. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the fact that petitioner retired in the year 2009, till date, nothing has been paid. My attention has been drawn to 2 Annexure-11 to the writ petition, which a communication made by Regional Deputy Director, Koshi Parmandal, Saharsa to Sub- Divisional Officer, Uda Kishunganj, Madhepura, whereby a direction was issued to make payment of arrears of salary of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in urgent need of money for the purpose of treatment of his wife, who is suffering from serious disease like cancer. Such fact has been stated in paragraph-23 of the writ petition. In view of the facts and circumstances, particularly, the urgency for granting relief to the petitioner in view of serious ailment of his wife and also in view of Annexure-11 to the writ petition, the court is of the opinion that the writ petition can be allowed at this stage without granting any adjournment. Accordingly, the writ petition stands allowed directing the respondents, particularly respondent no.5 to take all steps for clearing all the retiral dues of the petitioner within a period of six weeks 3 from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The newly added respondent i.e. respondent no.8/District Provident Fund Officer is also directed to make payment of amount of G.P.F. along with admissible statutory interest within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)