<^-' v ; •-• IJLA f / y '^ /• ^•••' ...<'^-<-' ^y^ x's^'^"'"..-" , ^^?£?"""" ^y^" \^*I-'"' '^ 1J)ILIP NANBI S/0 LATE JANKINATH AGED ABOUT 42 YBARS R/0 SUBHASH NAGAR, P.0. BOIRDABAS DIST. KAIGARH. (CHHATTISGASH) 2VIJAYSHEEL S/0 LATE TASAPAD AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/0 SUBHASHNAGAR,P.O.BOIRDADAR DIST. RAIGARH. (CHHATTISGARH) 3.NIKMALA VISHWAS W/0 LATE RASIKLAL AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS K/0 SUBHASHNAGAR,P.O.BODtDADAR DIST.RAIGARH. (CHHATTISGARH) 4.KABUNAMAIROY W/0 LATE UPENDSANATH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/0 SUBHASH NAGAR, P.0. BOmBADAR MST. RAIGAKH. (CHHATTBGARH) 5.LEELA SAHA W/0 1ATE NAGENDSA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/0 SUBHASH NAGAR, P.O.BOIRDADAR DIST. SAIGARH. (CHHATTISGABH) 6.AMIOBALA W/0 LATE UPENBKANATH AGEB ABOUT 65 YEASS R/0 SCBHASHNAGAR,P.O.BOIRDADAR BIST. SAIGARH. (CHHATTISGARH) -.( W/0 LATE SHDBODH AGBD ABOUT 70 YEASS R/0 SUBHASH NAGAK, P.0. BOIRDADAR BBT. RAIGARH. (CHHATTISGARiB) S.TRAPTI RANI MITRA W/0 LATE SURENDRANATH AGED ABOUT 65 YEASS R/0 SUBHASH NAGAR, P.0. BOffiBABAR DIST. RAIGARH. (CHHATTISGARH) 9.SUMITSA SANI DAS W/0 LATE SATISH CHANDRA DAS AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/0 SUBHASH NAGAR, P.0. BOmDADAR DIST. RAIGARH. (CBHATTISGASH) 10.RANGWALA W/0 LATE SUKENDAS NATH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/0 SUBHASHNAGAR,P.O.BOIRDABAR DIST. RAIGARH. (CHHATTISGARH) ll.SHEPALISARKAR W/0 MANORANJAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEASS B/0 SITBHASHNAGAR.P.O.BOIRDADAR DIST. RAIGARH. (CHHATTISGARH) 12J)ULAL KARMEKAR S/0 LATE VISHAMBHAR AGBD .4BOUT 45 YEAKS R/Q SUBHASH NAGAK, P.0. BOIRDADAR BIST. SAIGARH. (CHHATTISGABH) 13.BIPAD BHANJAN VISHWAS S/0 LATE ATITL KRISHAN AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/0 SUBHASH NAGAR, P.0. BOIRDADAB DIST. RAIGAKH. (CHHATTISGARH) 14.SARLARAHA W/0 LATE HARIPAD AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS fi/0 SUBHASHNAGAS,P.O.BOIRDADAfi DIST. RAIGARH. (CHHATTISGARH) z, 15. SUCHITRA VISHWAS W/0 LATE NAKAYAN AGED ABOUT 60 YKARS R/0 SUBHASH NAGAR, P.0. BOffiDADAR DIST. RAIGARH. (CHHATTISGARH) 16. PUTU1 SANI KAKMIKAB S/0 LATE SUDHDt KARMIKAR AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/0 SUBHASHNAGAR,P.O.BOIRDABAR MST. RAIGASH. (CHHATTISGABH) 17. JASHODEV GANGULY S/0 LATE JATADHAR AGED ABOUT 34 YEA&S R/0 SUBHASHNAGAR,P.O.BOIRDADAR DIST. KAIGABH. (CHHATTISGASH) 18. TCLURANI GHATAK W/0 LATE ,MOTBLAL AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/0 SUBHASH NAGAR, P.0. BOttDADAR DK.T. RAIGARH. (CHHATTISGARH) 19. SHOBHARANIDAS W/0 LATE SANTOSH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/0 SUBHASHNAGAR.P.O.BOIRDADAR DIST. SAIGASH. (CHHATTISGARH) 20.GOLAPIDEVNATH W/0 LATE SHMVAS CHANTU AGED ABOUT 60 YBARS R/0 SUBHASHNAGAR,P.O.BOIRDADAR DIST. RAIGARH. (CHHATTKGASH) 21. GAURANGPAD ADfflKARI S/0 LATE KRISHNAPAD AGED ABOUT 32 YBARS K/0 SHBHASH NAGAB, P.0. BODtBADAR DIST.KAIGARH. (CHHATTBGARH) 22.LILABANIDAS W/0 LATE SUNIL AGEB ABOUT 55 YEARS R/0 SUBHASHNAGAR,P.O.BOIRDADAR DIST.KAIGABH. (CHHATTISGASH) (^) 23J>IINARAWDAS W/0 LATE NIRMAL BAS AGED ABOUT 65 YBARS R/0 SUBHASHNAGAR>P.O.BOIRDADAa DIST. RAIGARH. (CHHATTISGAKH) 24.KARUNASARKAR W/0 LATE SATISH AGED ABOUT 60 YBARS R/0 SUBHASHNAGAR,P.O.BOIRDADAR DIST. RAIGARH. (CHHATTISGARH) 25. GOPAL BOSE AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/0 SCBHASH NAGAR, P.0. BOHtDADAS DIST. RAIGASH. (CHHATTISGARH) 26.KHOKANSARKAR S/0 LATE ANIL AGED ABOVT 35 YEARS R/0 SUBHASHNAGAR,P.O.BOBtDABAR DBT. SAIGABH. (CHHATTISGASH) 27.BIMLAHALDAAR W/OSMSANTOSH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS K/0 SUBHASHNAGAR,P.O.BOIRDADAR DIST. RAIGARH. (CHHATTISGARH) VERSUS 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SECRETARY URBAN ADMINISTRATION DKS BHAWAN, RAiPUR CHHATTISGARH. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR RAIGARH CHHATTISGARH. ^ / / 3. COnmiSSIOINER / MUNICIPAL CORPORATION RAIGARH. CHHATTISGARH. 4. DISTRICT REHABILITATION OFFICER RAIGARH CHHATTIAGaRH. WRTT PETTTION XJNDER ARTICLE 2^6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIDN OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THENATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBmON, CERTIORARI ETC OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE 1N TBEMATTER. ^•i. Amit :s°. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRIT PETmON No. 1172 . Dilip Nandi & Others. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. RESPONDENTS WKTT PETETION UM3ER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA 8B: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asmhotri. J. Present: Shri Vipin Punjabi,Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Goveniment Advocate for the State/respondent No. 1,2 and 4. ORDERCORAL) (Passed on 10n day ofMay, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that fhe petitioners have made an application to ttie Collector, Raigarh, on 30.01.2003 to decide the question ofallotment and possession of Nazul laiid. However, the same could not be decided till date. 2. Be tfaat as it may, on fhe request of leamed counsel for fhe petitioners, since more than 8 years have passed, liberty is granted to the petitioners to make a fi-esh applicatioi], if so advised. In the event, application/representation is made, the Collector may consider the same in aceordance with law, on its own merits and perspective, as expeditiously as possible. 3. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge