[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.743 OF 2008 Ms. Kanta Dadu Pawar ..Applicant Vs. Prasad Sudhir Mandhare and Anr. ..Respondent ... Mr.R.D.Suryawanshi Advocate for Applicant Mr.S.V.Marwadi Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr.S.S.Pednekar APP for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JULY 10, 2008 DATE : JULY 10, 2008 DATE : JULY 10, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant-original complainant, the learned advocate for respondent no.2-original accused and the A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the accused by order dated 18.2.2008 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Thane in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 233 of 2008. 3. It is seen that thereafter the charge sheet has [-2-] been filed and regular bail has been granted to the respondent no.2-accused. Looking to this fact, I am of the opinion that no case is made out for interference in the order granting anticipatory bail order dated 18.2.2008. 4. Application is rejected and is disposed of accordingly. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]