IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 21632 of 2007 Between: M/s.Sri Venkateshwara Engineering Enterprises, rep.by its Proprietor N.Venkateswarlu, S/o.Narsimha R/o.1-9-253, Kushaiguda, ECIL Post Hyderabad District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd rep.by its managing Director,Industrial Bhavan,Hyderabad 2 The Zonal Manager, Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., Warangal 3 The General Manager, District Industrial Centre Warangal 4 Swathi Enterprises, rep.by A.Shivalingam Goud, S.No.8-301/1B, Behind St.Joseph school, Goutham Nagar Ferozguda, Bownpally post, Secunderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in proposing to allot/alenate the plot No.54 admeasuring 500 sq.yards situated in Sy.no.61/3,62/2 of Jangaon village and Manda, Warangal District in favour of the 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles,14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents Nos. 1 to 3 herein to execute the Sale Deed in favour of the petitioner in respect of the above said plot by receiving the balance sale consideration and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon`ble court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.SRINIVASA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.V.SIMHADRI The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 21632 of 2007 ORAL ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments, no further orders are required and the grievance of the petitioner does not subsist. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 04-07-2008 Pvks/*