/®6'/ 81NGLE ?r IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATHSGARHl WRIT PETmON N0. '3'8'<s /2006. ^v^ ^^ ^•" PETmONER: .,•• .^^' .^t^/ .••"'. .k'-'^^y" Respondents c^ Hulas Ram Thakur, S/o Anand Ram Thakur, aged abbut 36 years, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Primary School, Bargaon, Block Development Saja, Bemetara, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS 1. State of Chhatdsgarh, 'nu-ough The' Secretary School Education Department Minis&y D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur, « Chhattisgarh. 2. Director of School Education Officer,' D.K-S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhatdsgarh. 3. The District Education OfEcer, Through " Block Developinent Mucation Officer, Bemetara, Durg, Chhattisgarh. <^VRrr pEimoN UNDER AKHCLE 226/227 OF THE dbNSTTTUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRTT IN <d ^oTHE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERT10RARI. PROHIBmON .^^ - ^_"___' ______„__ .^^ ^ ________ ^' AND FOR THE OTHER SIMILAR WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECnON OR DIRECTIONS. XI-HC-78 ^I+IMI sh*lich ~SS( '^wv{t{, Vn^VW, KwVf. ..LJ.f./.^-..?^^6< ^200 3ii^<?i 4a<»i ('i^it^'^ff) 3:I1^Tq;rR-fi«b traTsn^rsb^ish ?^<IRT( flfN 3n^?T 7.8.2006:- Heard Shri O.P. Sahu, counse 5hri 5umesh Bqj<y, &.A. for •t^ie respondents, on advance copy. By this petition, the petition^ to 9rant two advance increments to the B.T.I examination on his own exfl The case of the petitioner Teacher on 8.8.1991 vide Anne 24-12-1998 issued by erstwhile 5ta1 passed the B.T.I. examination befor incr'ements and the teachers who 22.10.1964 on their own expenses ar^ also entitled for two advance increments. Other- similarly situated persons ha them and based on that they have vide Annexure P-5 and inspite of re| treatment is not be'mg given to hiro. Therefore, learned counsel petitioner may be atlowed to make No.3 and in turn, he be dir'ected to which Shri Bqjaj, learned 6ovt. Advdpate for the State has no objection. Having hewd learned counsel and circumstances of the case, with °hl<<F^l41-1 t||t1tlT^'tel^t<.|a]<ri;K ^T3Tf^IT3TI^r for the petitioner. r has pr'ayed that respondents be directed 1'he petitioner, as the petitioner- has passed enses. is that he was appointed as Assistant <ure P-3. As per Instructions dated e of M.P. the Assistant Teacher-swho have e 22.10.1964 are entitled for two advance haye passed the B.T.I. examination after ve moved an application before the State Administrative Tcibunal, Bench at l^aipur, the Tribunal hce granted relief to seen granted two advance increments. The petitioner' had passed B.T.I. examin^ition on his own expenses in the year 1994 resentation made by the petitioner- similar for- the petitioner submits that the a detailed representation to respondent decide the same in accordance iwith law, to for the parties, having regard to the facts ^ut expressin9 any opinion on the merit of the case, the petitioner is allowed t<( make a detailed representation along with P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3:s?'^[pn?pr, BTflu'i<o,!°tcii^y< <^1*<MI Sh*fich 3n^?r^irR-fi«h craTsn^Tshtiiqi Roshan ^ ^ ¥R;200 3TT^?T(raW (l^fg^ST) BTaTW flf?a'sn^r •2. aibd copy of this petition raising all period of 15 days from todoy examine the case of the petitior|er petitioner in this petition and in reaches to the conclusion that silmil benefit of two advanceincrement^ grant of two advance increments pass orders within a period of 3 m4nths With the direction afor-esai9, Parties are entitled for cer1 (lis grievances to respondent No.3 within a in turn, respondent No.3 is directed to in the light of averments made b^ the \he representation also. If r-espondent No.3 i^nilar'ly situated persons have been granted and the petitioner's case is also covered for jsn the basis of ffovernment's order,then to from today, in accordance with law. I, the petition stands disposed of. rtfied copy of this order. it)i<<Iti41-f '<ii<-iTffto^t<Ri't-<;i< ^3rf^T3(1^T Sd?- L.C. S.hE'etOO Judge P.T.O.