IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH JULY 2011 / 5TH SRAVANA 1933 OP (FC).No. 2290 of 2011(R) ------------------------ I.A. NO. 1599(a)/2011 IN OP.NO. 707/2011 OF FAMILY COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM .................. PETITIONER / PETITIONER : ------------------------------------------ NAIR KAVITHA RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 25 YERAS, D/O.R.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, RESIDING AT SEELEKSHMI, GRA-G49, CHEMPAZHANTHI LANE, GANDHIPURAM, SREEKARIAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695017 BY ADVS. SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT : --------------------------------------------- BINU V.S., AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.S.VIJAYAN NAIR, RESIDING AT KARITHIKA, HOUSE NO.649, PRASANTH NAGAR, MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 011. BY ADVS. SRI.BASANT BALAJI SRI.R.GOPAN THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- OP (FC).No. 2290 of 2011(R) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, TRIVANDRUM DATED 10.5.2011. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT IN I.A. 1599(a)/11 IN OP 707/11. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IN O.P.NO. 678/2011 DATED 6.5.2011. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 21.5.2011. EXT.P5 : PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE FAMILY COURT, TRIVANDRUM IN I.A. NO. 1599(a)/2011 IN OP NO. 707/2011 DATED 8.7.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan & K.Surendra Mohan, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = OP(FC).No.2290 of 2011-R = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 27th day of July, 2011. Judgment Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. This original petition is filed invoking Article 227 of the Constitution. The petitioner, the mother of the child in question, challenges Ext.P5 order of the Family Court regarding visitation rights. During deliberations at the admission stage, we thought it fit to refer the case for mediation. The parties accepted that suggestion. They took recourse to mediation. That had been fruitful. The settlement arrived at between the parties is before us along the report of the mediator. The 'Terms of Settlement' entered into between the parties as a result of the mediation is recorded on 22th July, 2011 under signatures of the parties and their counsel and OPFC2290/11 -: 2 :- is placed before us. We record the said 'Terms of Settlement' and order that as of now, the parties will be regulated by the terms of that settlement in supersession of the contents of Ext.P5 order. We also leave open the rights of parties to move the Family Court if and when, under any change of circumstances in relation to the ward in question, orders may be found necessary. The original petition ordered accordingly. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. K.Surendra Mohan, Judge. Sha/2707