: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.406 OF 2007 Sanjay D.Surdikar ....Petitioner V/s. Ranjeet K. Desai & Ors. ....Respondents Mr.Surel S. Shah for the Petitioner. Mr.S.V. More, AGP for the State. Mr.V.B. Naik for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 10TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. : 1. The amounts payable as per interim order of the School Tribunal upto 1.11.2007 has been tendered in Court today by Respondent Nos.1 and 2. The office is directed to permit the Petitioner to forthwith withdraw the same upon the demand draft being realized by the office. The office is directed to ensure that the procedure is completed within two weeks from today. 2. Mr.Naik fairly states that the withdrawal of the order dated 5.3.2007 comes into force on the date of the order dated 21.9.2007 itself. The statement is accepted. Nothing more regarding the order dated : 2 : 21.9.2007 needs to be done. It is contempt of this order that is in issue. 3. Mr.Naik clarify that the communication dated 7.4.2008 be accordingly read as withdrawal being with effect from 21.9.2007 i.e. the date of the order passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No.6748 of 2007. I express no opinion. Mr.Naik is also willing to pay over the suspension allowances to the Petitioner in Court. He has a demand draft in the sum of Rs.27,947/- for the same. Mr.Shah, refuses to accept the amount. In view thereof, the tender of the demand draft is not accepted. It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties are kept open including those relating to the tender of suspension amount and the effect of the withdrawal notice dated 7.4.2008. 4. The Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of.