IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.753 of 1984 Date of Decision:04.03.2011 Krishan Chander . . .Appellant Versus Brij Lal and another . . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.M.L. Sarin, Sr. Advocate, with Mr.Nitin Sarin, Advocate, for the appellant. None for the respondents. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) On 6.1.2011, following order was passed by this Court: “Learned counsel for the appellant has stated that the shop in question has already been demolished and is replaced by shopping complex. She prays for a short adjournment to file appropriate affidavit of the appellant in this regard. On her request, adjourned to 07.02.2011. Let it be the last opportunity.” Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though the affidavit was sent to the appellant but he has not returned after getting it signed and attested. However, he submits that this appeal may be disposed of in view of the statement made on 6.1.2011 and in case, there is any shortcoming in the statement pointed out by the appellant, liberty may be granted by this Court to revive this appeal. In view of the stand taken by the learned counsel for the appellant, present appeal is disposed of in terms of the statement recorded on 6.1.2011 where he had stated that the shop in question has already been demolished, therefore, nothing survives in this appeal for the purpose of adjudication. Hence, the same is hereby disposed of as infructuous with liberty as aforesaid. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MARCH 04, 2011 JUDGE Vivek