IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 5022 of 2008 Between: 1 Yeturu Gangaiah S/o. Sri Y. Peddanna R/o.Kallur Village, Proddutur Mandal, Kadapa District-516 355 2 S. Obuelesu S/o.Obulanna R/o.Kallur Village, Proddutur Mandal, Kadapa District-516 355 3 D. Subramanyam S/o. Subbarayudu Chandalur Village, Annavaram Post, Chapadu Mandal, Kadapa District. 4 Madala Srinivasula Reddy S/o. Late Sri Venkata Subba Reddy Peddachattupalli Village, Proddutur Mandal, Kadapa District. 5 N. Gangadhar S/o. Gangaiah Nakkaladinne Village & Post Chapadu Mandal, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Tirupati, Rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director. 2 Chief General Manager (HRD) Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Tirupati. 3 Superintending Engineer (Operations) Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Railway Station Road, Kadapa. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction or a writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus restraining the first respondent from giving effect to the Memo No. CGM/HRD/OS.II/AB.III/PO.VII/D.No. 195/08 dt. 7-3-2008. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.RAVINDRANATH Counsel for the Respondents: P.R.BALARAMI REDDY(SC FOR AP TRANSCO) The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioners challenge the memo, dated 07.03.2008, issued by the 1st respondent. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, on instructions, submits that the 1st respondent has decided to withdraw the impugned memo. It is stated that instructions have already been issued to respondents 2 and 3 not to go ahead with the steps mentioned in the impugned memo. Recording this statement, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ Dt.11.03.2008 L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J GJ