1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3390 OF 2007 1) Shri Parag s/o Upendra Bhalchandra, R/o-Ganesh Park, Ambejogai, Dist-Beed. 2) Shri Achyut Ratnakarrao Mulujkar, R/o-Muluj, Tq-Omerga, Dist-Osmanabad, 3) Sanganak Anudan Kruti Samittee- Maharashtra Pradesh, Through its President, Shri. Sanjay Dashrathrao Ghule, R/o-Near Rural Hospital, Kalam, Dist-Osmanabad, 4) Shri Vaibhav s/o Marotirao Pathak, R/o- 1-26, Viveknagar, Parbhani, Member of Sanganak Anudan Kruti Samitee. ...PETITIONERS. VERSUS 1) State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Department of Higher Education & Technical Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32, 2) Director of Higher Education, State of Maharashtra, Pune-1, 3) Yogeshwari Mahavidyalaya, Ambejogai, Through its Secretary, Yogeshwari Education Society, Ambajogai, Dist-Beed. ...RESPONDENTS. 2 ... Shri.V.J. Dixit Senior Counsel i/b. Shri. S.V. Natu Advocate for Petitioners. Shri.V.H. Dighe,A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1& 2. Shri.V.R.Sonwalkar Advocate for Respondent No.3 ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 25TH MARCH, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned senior counsel Shri Dixit has brought to our notice Order passed by the Division Bench of this Court (Coram: S.J.Vazifdar and P.R. Borkar, JJ.) in Writ Petition No.486 of 2007 dated 24th April, 2007. It was pointed out that identical request was made by the Petitioners therein. This Court had observed that the representation filed by the Petitioners therein will be considered keeping in view all the factors. 3 3. Admittedly the Petitioners, in the Petition referred above, were lecturers. This Petition also raises identical issue. We therefore find, in the light of the Order passed in Writ Petition No.486 of 2007, this Petition can be disposed of. Learned senior counsel Shri Dixit submits that the Petitioners may also file representation to the State Authorities. The Petitioners are at liberty to file the representation to the State Authorities. The State Authorities may pass appropriate orders on such representations, by taking into consideration the policy of the State and all other relevant factors. 4. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. [N.D. DESHPANDE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/MAR10/wp3390.07