^.^.S%3P'^V -^gi^" c -s. ?fsg ^ ^iRt.,^-?' Zoo /,— pTese^-'"" &aWA--" IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fQNO. ^l^ /2010 PETITIONERS 'l] 2] / RESPONDENTS 1] /-2] ^3] 4] / 5] 6] Rita Shukla, W/o. Kalyan Kishore Shukla, aged about 35 years, R/o. Village Farasgaon, Tahsil Farasgaon, District Bastar (C.G.) Kalyan Kishore Shukla, S/o. R. Shukla, aged about 55 years, R/o. Village Farasgaon, Tahsil Farasgaon, District Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through: Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Bastar Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) Tahsildar, Farasgaon, District Bastar (C.G.) Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Farasgaon, District Bastar (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Farasgaon, District Bastar (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Tribal Department, Block Farasgaon, District Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA mOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C} No. 7107 of2010 PETITIONERS : Rita Shukla & Another. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asnihotri, J. Present: Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri A.S.Kachhwaha, Dy. A.G. for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 06th day of December, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instmctions, submits that he does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage and submits that the petitioners may be permitted to make a representation to the respondent authorities and in tum, the respondent-authorities may be directed to considered and decide the same as expeditiously as possible, as there is a dispute with regard to the fact asto whether the accommodation was allotted to the petitioner No. 1 or to the petitioner No. 2. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondent No. 1, 2, 3 and 6 submits that in the event, a representation is made, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits and perspective, within a period oftwo weeks. 3. It is accordingly ordered. 4. In view ofthe above, without expressing any opinion on the merits ofthe case, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated observation and direction. ^- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge