IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.21 of 2010 Date of decision: 06.01.2010 M/s Sadhu Ram and sons ....Petitioner versus Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. Robin Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) 1. The writ petition seeks for a mandamus to restrain to respondents 2 to 4 from taking any decision against the petitioner till the present miscellaneous application alleged to be pending before the 1st respondent for restoration of the appeal before the 1st respondent. The petitioner contends that the petitioner is liable to pay only Rs.90,000/- while the demand made through the possession notice is in the range of Rs.40,69,725.08. The petitioner states that he will deposit the admitted amount of Rs.90,000/- within two days. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall make the payment directly to the State Bank of India before 11.01.2010 and the 1st respondent will itself consider the plea for stay on the date when the application is posted for Civil Writ Petition No.21 of 2010 - 2 - hearing. In the meanwhile, the respondent shall not cause physical dispossession of the petitioner from the property. If the amount is not deposited with the Bank as directed, the direction with reference to the protection against dispossession shall not be operative. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission dispensing notice to the respondents. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 06.01.2010. sanjeev