1 ss2920-10 vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.2920 OF 2010 Rajabai G. Gadge ....Plaintiff V/s. Shantidevi Pratapsingh ....Defendant Mr.S.R. Shukla i/b Ramesh Jain & Kusum Jain for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 5TH OCTOBER, 2011. P.C. :- 1. The suit is filed on an on demand promissory note executed by the defendant. The plaintiff is a money lender. The plaintiff has produced the money lenders licence, which was valid at the relevant time. 2. The defendant failed and neglected to repay the amount or even to reply to the plaintiff’s advocates notice demanding payment. 3. A compilation of documents is tendered in Court, taken on record and marked Exhibit “A” collectively. 4. There is no defence to the suit. There is nothing on record that militates against the averments and submissions in the plaint. 5. In the circumstances, the suit is decreed as prayed. 2 ss2920-10 However, interest after the date of the suit shall be at the rate of 12% p.a. Costs to be quantified as per rules. Refund, if any, as per rules.