..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.86 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.61 OF 2007 Gautam Mohan Dhareshwar ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondent. .... Mr.M.K.Kocheta, Adv. for the Applicant. Mrs.S.V.Gajre, APP, for State. Mr.H.V.Mehta, Counsel for Respondent No.2. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 22nd February, 2007. DATED : 22nd February, 2007. DATED : 22nd February, 2007. P.C.: 1. Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant-orig.accused No.2, the learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for respondent No.2. 3. The applicant has been convicted under Section 120-B r/w. Sections 419, 420, 468 and 471 ..(2).. of IPC and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for two years. The applicant is now seeking bail. 4. The learned Advocate for the applicant has submitted that the applicant was on bail during the trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. This statement is not controverted by the prosecution. The learned Advocate for the applicant has further submitted that the sentence of imprisonment is two years and the appeal is not likely to be heard within that time. Hence, he has prayed that the applicant may be released on bail. 5. Looking to all these facts and evidence on record, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. 6. The applicant to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. 7. Application is disposed of accordingly. ..(3).. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)