IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.5617 OF 2004 Shankar @ Dhanaji Manik Suravanshi & Anr. ...Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.V.N.Golawala for Applicants. Mr.R.Y.Mirza, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. FEBRUARY 8, 2005. FEBRUARY 8, 2005. FEBRUARY 8, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. As it is not in dispute that co-accused Ashok Kumar who is the prime accused, has already been released on bail and that order has not been challenged by the prosecution, the Applicants deserve to be enlarged on bail on parity. Accordingly, the Applicants are granted bail on the : 2 : following conditions: (a) The Applicants are granted bail in connection with C.R.No.342 of 2004 registered with M.I.D.C. Police Station on executing personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) each, with one or two local sureties in the like amount. (b) The Applicants shall report to the M.I.D.C. Police Station on second Monday of every English Calender month between 6.00 p.m. and 8.00 p.m. until such other or further orders to be passed by the Trial Court. (c) The Applicants shall not influence the prosecution witnesses or tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner whatsoever. (d) The Applicants shall extend full co-operation to the Trial Court for early disposal of the trial and if the Trial Court is of the opinion that the Applicants are responsible for the delay of the trial, that fact be recorded in the : 3 : Roznama, which will be a ground for cancellation of bail. 3. Application disposed of on the above terms. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.