IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 8604 of 2011. Decided on: 28th September, 2011. Veena Singh Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. S.D. Vasudeva, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG and Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- “That a writ in the nature of mandamus may very kindly be issued by directing the respondents No. 2 and 3 to provide proper sitting place for all the deities in Dhalpur Dushehra ground, at Kullu on the same analogy as is done in Shivratri festival at Mandi. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that the second respondent has looked into all these aspects and has taken proper measure. However, it is submitted that in case the petitioner is in a position to point out any suggestions, they are always welcome and the respondents will certainly look into the same. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of as follows. 2 3. In the event of the petitioner pointing out any suggestions before the second and third respondents, the same will be looked into by those respondents and appropriate action in accordance with law and in the exigencies of administration shall be taken by the second and third respondents. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. 5. Two authenticated copies of this judgment shall be given to the petitioner to be produced before the second and third respondents alongwith the copy of the writ petition. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 28th September, 2011(K) (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge.