IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42496 of 2008 1. RAJ KUMAR MAHTO,SON OF SRI LAKSHMAN MAHTO 2. LALAN KUMAR MAHTO @ LALAN MAHTO, SON OF SRI LAKSHMAN MAHTO 3. CHOTE LAL MAHTO, SON OF SRI LAKSHMAN MAHTO RESIDENCE OF VILLAGE- MUSEPUR, P.S. SINGHIYA, DISTRICT-SAMASTIPUR (BIHAR)…………….PETITIONERS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 2. 18.12.08. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with C.R. No. 354 of 2006, T.R. No. 1584 of 2008, for offences under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 34 of the said Act. It is submitted that petitioners and claimant both are claimed to be purchaser of the same land in question. The complainant is the purchaser in which a sale deed was executed by the co-accused Braj Bhushan Prasad Singh, whereas the petitioners are purchaser of the land executed by other co-accused persons Awadesh Kumar Singh and Asha Devi and others. It is submitted that as a matter of fact, petitioners have been facing trouble on account of differences between the family of the vendors. It is further submitted that complainant instead of solving the problem has filed this present complaint for ulterior purpose. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioners namely, (1) Raj Kumar mahto, (2) - 2 - Lalan Kumar Mahto @ Lalan Mahto and (3) Chote Lal Mahto, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri J. K. Dubey, Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Rosera, District-Samastipur, in connection with C.R. No. 354 of 2006 T.R. NO. 1584 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Sub Section 2 of Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)