THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR SAMP No. 1086 of 2011 in S.A. No. 398 of 2010 and S.A. No. 398 of 2010 Common Judgment: This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 18.01.2010 passed in A.S. No. 193 of 2004 by the II Additional District Judge, Ongole, confirming the judgment and decree dated 08.09.2004 passed in O.S. No.1 of 1999 by the Senior Civil Judge, Parchur. The appellants-defendants and the respondent-plaintiff are present before the Court. The parties are represented by their counsel and both the counsel have identified the appellants and the respondent. The parties have also identified one another. They have filed a petition in SAMP No. 1086 of 2011, under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC, along with memorandum of compromise, seeking to record the compromise in terms thereof. Both the parties have agreed to the terms of the compromise and categorically stated that they have entered into the compromise in the interest of both the parties and that there is no coercion or inducement in entering into the compromise. I am convinced that the parties have voluntarily entered into the settlement with their free Will. In view of the same, SAMP No.1086 of 2011 is allowed and the terms of memorandum of compromise are recorded. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the compromise. However, in the circumstances, no costs. ______________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J. Date: 30.04.2011 Note: Issue CC in one week (B/O) Nsr