IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 496 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 170 OF 2000 GOPAL V.N.PANVELKAR & ORS. ... Applicant Versus DY.COLLECTOR & LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER & ANR. ... Respondent Mr. Shivan Dessai, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. M. Salkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- S.B. DESHMUKH & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 22nd November, 2010 P.C.:- We have heard learned Counsel Mr. Shivan Dessai appearing for the applicants and the Additional Government Advocate for the respondents. In para 3 of the application, it has been contended by the applicants that pursuant to an understanding between the applicants, appellant Nos. 1, 3 and 4 have executed a power of attorney cum declaration of release of right dated 21st March, 2000 wherein applicants No.1, 3 and 4 have relinquished all the rights in respect of compensation to the acquired lands and applicant No.2 has been conferred powers to receive the entire consideration, benefits, compensation in respect of the lands subject-matter of the acquisition in his own name. We have also noticed the statement made in para 4 that application No.622/2009 was filed before this Court, seeking a direction to the respondents to draw the demand draft in respect of compensation with regard to the above lands in favour of the applicant No.2. A reference is also made to Misc. Civil Application No.246/2010 in para 6 of the application. It is further contended that a SLP was filed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court against the Judgment and Order dated 6th May, 2009 and the said SLP was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. A copy of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court is Annexure A-5 annexed to the application. 2. The Counsel for the applicants seeks withdrawal of the amount of Rs.12.51 lakhs deposited before this Court, with accrued interest in favour of applicant No.2 Mr. Ganesh V. N. Panvelcar. The Counsel appearing for the applicants, on instructions, makes a statement that the understanding amongst the applicants No.1 to 4 stands subsists as of today. We have heard learned Addl. Govt. Advocate. In our opinion, this application can be allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), permitting applicant No.2, Ganesh V. N. Panvelcar to withdraw the amount of Rs.12.51 lakhs with accrued interest. The application, accordingly, is allowed and disposed of. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. F. M. REIS, J. ssm.