1) Heard teamed counsel for the parties. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest his petition on merits at this stage; however, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation dated 27-4-2009 (Annexure — PM) submitted by the petitioner is pending/consideration before the District Education Ofhcer, Jashpur and ever since no action has been taken on the said application. 3) Learned counsel appearing for the $tae submits that the pending ‘ representation of the petitioner would be considered and decided, in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4) ln view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adiudication. 5) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. // HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.3165 OF 2009 PETITIONER Takeshwar Yadav, age about 47 yeare, Asstt. Teacher; Sic Shri Hiradhar Yadav, Govt. Middle School, Budhadand Biock Bagicha, Dist. Jashpur (CG). Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secremry, Educatien Department, DKS ‘Bhawan. Raipur, Dist. Raipur (CG). Distt. Edusatien Otiicer, Jasheur, Dist. Jashpur (CG). t Block Education Officer, Bagicha, Dist. Jashpur (CG). ‘Budhram, Slo Chaitan Ram, UDT, age about 50 years. Govt. Middle school, Sendarimuda, Diett. Jashpur (CG). . '5. Bhim Sen Yadav, S/o Umesh Chand, Upper Division Teacher. Govt. Middie“ School, Kokiyakhar, Dist. Jashpur (CG). 6. Dineshwar Ram Nirala, UDT Primary School Uperkapa Block Kunkuri. Dist. Jashpur (CG) (Writ petition under Artlcie 226 of the Conetrtutlon of India) Single Bench Hon bio Shn satish K Agnihotn, v Present :- Shri Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. O DER ORAL (Passed on this 7‘ day or! Septemhe', 2..0°‘ "\ ,. sdl‘ ggit‘ow" atis“K wdge . S