S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) No. L10 §§/2010. PETITIONER: / Bhagwat Prasad Sahu, son of Khemlal Sahu, aged about 54 years, working as Assistant Teacher at Govt. Middle School, Banmani, Kasdole, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. VersuS Respondents / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. /2. District Education Officer, Raipur, > Chhattisgarh. /3. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA wagywwym mm wt 2oo mm (ma) WWW ammm Shri C. Jayant K. Rae, oou sel far the petitioner‘ Shri Ajit Singh, Panel wyer for the State/respondents on advance copy‘ Heard. Learned counsel appeari g fer the petitioner submits that the petitioner‘is entitled to benefit of o advance increments on account of he having passed BTJ. examina ion before his appointment at his own cost. it is submitted that the issu involved in the present petition is no longer res integra and the same as been finally decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of A ha Saxena vs. State of MP. 8. Ors., 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59. it is fu her submitted that this Court has also taken a similar View in his rder dated 06-02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008‘ Learn counsei for the petitioner further draws attention of this Court to order d ed 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeai No.124 of 2009, wherein relying u on thejudgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Ashe Saxeha (supr ) and the order passed by this Court in another Writ Appeai No‘87/20 , directions have been issued for consideration of the case for gr t of two advance increments as per circular dated 21-09-1974 issued y the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the facts pleaded in e petition Learned counsei for the spondents submits that case of the petitioner wouid also be considere on the same lines. WW mm (mafiaiu) mummy! v” L In View of the statement made above, this petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner f ‘ grant of two advance increments as per circuiar dated 21-09-1 974 iss d by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the facts pieade in the petition within a period of eight weeks from today. m 200 WWW @W taffaqm Tumane ‘& Sd/— i Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge