FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.126 OF 2006 (Kalyanrao s/o Kashinathrao Biradar Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Shri R.D. Biradar, Advocate for the petitioner Shri V.B. Ghatge, A.G.P. for State ... CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 6th December, 2010 1. Heard. The grievance of the petitioner is, in spite of the police authorities communicated with several representations to assist the petitioner, there is no compliance by the authorities, who, according to him, are under collaboration with the rival group. 2. The respondent No.6, the then police officer is not served. On the aforesaid ground, it hardly amounts to any breach of the order of this Court. Contempt Petition lacks merits, dismissed. No costs. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE fmp/cp126.06