IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7256 of 2010 SHYAM KUMAR @ SANJEEV KUMAR DAS SON OF BINOD DAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 5.3.2010 Learned Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make correction in paragraph 7 of the petition. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections25(1-B)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and 17 of the C.L.A. Act as well as Sections 17, 18, 20 of the U.P.A. Act. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner’s name was disclosed by the co-accused, who was caught at the spot and therefore there has been no recovery from the petitioner nor does he claim to be a member of any Naxalite out fit, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 13.11.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J., F.T.C.IV, Banka in S.T.No.141 of 2010 arising out of Amarpur P.S.case No.202 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of - 2 - misuse and (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )