IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT PETITION NO : 386 of 2009 Between: Baira Ailamma, W/o. Baira Siddaiah, R/o. H.No. 1098, Papireddy Nagar, Chandanagar, Serilingapally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Station House Officer, Chandanagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad, at Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to For the reasons stated in the "Petition" dated NIL sent by the Petitioner herein, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an Order, direction, or a Writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the Respondents herein to produce the son of Petitioner herein namely B. Sathaiah, S/o. Baira Siddaiah, aged 35 years, before this Hon'ble Court, who was illegally taken away by the police of Chandanagar on 02-01-2009 at about 12.00 noon and apprehending danger to his life and set him at liberty forthwith and to pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:TELEGRAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT PETITION NO.386 OF 2009 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy) This is a taken up writ petition on the basis of telegram sent by the petitioner alleging that her son by name, B.Sathaiah has been illegally taken away by the police of Chandanagar Police Station on 02.01.2009 and she is apprehending danger to his life. In response to the notice, the Inspector of Police, Chandanagar Police Station, 1st respondent herein filed an affidavit stating that the 1st respondent police summoned the alleged detenu to the police station on 02.01.2009 for the purpose of enquiry in connection with Crime No.5 of 2009 and after examination, the alleged detenu was let off on the same day with a direction to appear before the 1st respondent as and when his presence is required. Further, the statement of the alleged detenu recorded by the Mandal Executive Magistrate, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.District is also filed. The said statement discloses that alleged detenu has not been illegally detained but he was called to the police station in connection with Crime No.5 of 2009 and was let off on the same day. In view of the statement of the alleged detenu recorded by the Mandal Executive Magistrate, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.District, we do not see any merit in the contents of the telegram. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ (A. GOPAL REDDY, J.) _______________ (G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J.) FEBRUARY 04, 2009 TSR