IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32470 of 2009 CHHATRI YADAV . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 6.11.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the Counsel for the State. Petitioner is named in the First Information Report of Gopalganj P.S. case No.308 of 2004 instituted for offences under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Counsel for the petitioner submits that no specific overt act has been alleged against him. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. It is also stated that the specific allegation is against one Shyam Lal. Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner above named is allowed. Let the petitioner surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Naugachhia in Gopalpur P.S. case No. 308 of 2004, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of 2 Criminal Procedure. The case was instituted in the year 2004 and the petitioner has prayed for anticipatory bail after so many years, as such he will participate in the trial particularly as for a longer time the case must have been kept awaiting for petitioner’s appearance. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar