BailAppl 1178/08 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.1178/08 Sujadevi & Anr. Versus State DATE OF ORDER : 18/02/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Pankaj Gupta, for accused-petitioners Mr. Ashvin Sharma, Public Prosecutor *** Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the material on record. It has been contended by counsel that all the alleged offences for which they are facing trial, are bailable, but since proper information was not extended to them, they did not appear pending trial from January, 1997. Infact, they have no intention to delay the trial and accused- petitioners No.1 is an old lady and No.2 is by birth deaf. Public Prosecutor submits that despite the fact that these are bailable offences, but still petitioners are not co-operating for almost a decade, as such no indulgence can be extended to them. This cannot be ruled out that petitioners No.1 is an old lady and No.2 is by birth deaf and they are facing trial for bailable offences. Since they are not responding for long time, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioners. BailAppl 1178/08 [2] Consequently, the bail application u/s.438 Cr.P.C. stands dismissed. However, if both the petitioners surrender before learned trial Judge, he may take note of nature of offences and also the fact about she [petitioner No.1] being an old lady and No.2 is by birth deaf and consider their bail application sympathetically in accordance with law. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA1178Bail Application2008 18-2.doc