HISHGQyRT OBCNmflFRMWaH A»BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH \f,fW^- iil:,ll: 1 CORAM: HON'BLESHR(RNSVG8U^m,GJ. HON'BUESHRI^UNU. KUMMISINHA, •». APPELLANT PETmONER RESPONDENTS WritApTOal No.171 ef2007 Tulstram Chandet, aged aboyt 42 years, son of Shrj Dalu Ram CTiandel, worWng as Patwari, P.M. No. 21, R/o. vill. Thanode, Post Thanode, District Durg (C.G.) Versus 1. StateorChhattisgarh, Through- thg Sa;eetary, DepartmentofReyeliue, Dau Katyan Singh Bhawas, Raipur(C.O.) 2. Awar Sachly, DepaittBent of Rewnue, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur(ao.) 3. CoUector, Distt DUFB(C.G.) 4. Tukaram Lahte, wofking as F'^wan, P.H.No. 24, NsHagarh, Distt. Ouig (C.G.) Present; Shri T.K. Tiwari, learaed coynselfor theappellart. ShFiVinayWarit,leamec?Dy.AdvocateGeneral)i3rttre State/respbndents N0:1,2 and 3. BER (nKsedenOe'^RBln-tnr^aoo^ Shri T.K. Tiwari, leamed counsel fbrthea|^)ellant seeks penni^lon to wthdraw the writ appeal. 2. Permissiongranted. 3. The writ appeal is, therefore, dismissed as wifhclravm. Sd/- JChiefJustice ^l-^e,,^ \^. ...^^ ^ ^&%e