COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATRLLASPUR WRJT PETmON fC) No. 4267 of2009 PETMONER : Novelty Kliadi Industry Through its Proprietor Girdhari Lal Shamia, aged 44 years, s/o Late Radhsslwam Shamia, R/o RAdheshvam Shakuntala Niwas Plot No. 6 Ki'islma Saklia Society Daganiya District Raipiir. T7T7T?STTQ V £/tvt5kJ' s5 )NDENTS : 1. State of Clihattisgarh Tfarough the Secretar\-, Department of Rural Industi-ies, D.K.S. fcawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. CUiattisgarh Rajya Hatlikai'^ia Vikas Evam Vipnan Salikari Sangh Man.'adit, Tlirough its Managing Director, D-60, Sector - 3, Devend'-a Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Cimattisgai'h P^ajya Hatid,:argiia Vifcas Evam Vipnan Sal&ari Sangh Matyadit, Tm-ougli its General Manager, D-60 Sector -03, Devendi'a Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) ^.^DTT' T>WJTjr\\T 1 ~\~T~iJ!'D '••'DTT/^T 'K /?Q^' /-^T7 T^TF frMsTCT'TTT TTT^^T r^T7 T7<,~TiT ,4. WJ^J.I_,r£'ll^.^^?-^ UlM^Il-lS. ^UYll^/l^I!, ^,^0 v^r li~i£!,^v^lNiSlll Uil^-'lN ijr LLM^IA SB: Hon'ble Satish K. Asnihotri, J. esent: Shri J.N.Nande, Advocate fbrthe petitioner. Slii-i Ai'sa Sao, Govenuiient Advocate for the State. (ORAL) (Passed on 12th day of Augi.st, 2009) Meard. 1. By this petition, the petitioner prays for the foilowing reliefs: •'ir\ i, 10.1 1 ^^ "5 i U-< 0.4. . The Hon'ble Court naay kiiidly be pleased to ca!l for the entire records concemmg the petitioner's case from the possession ofthe respondents jxir its kind perasai. The Hon b!e Court may kindly be p!eased to issue a writ of mandaiiius to the responde.nts lo sraiit avaiiable processing work including dyeing and finishing of cloth up to thc maximum proeessmg capacity of the petrtioner. The Hon ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ against the respondents directing them not to harass the petitioner by way ofpressurizing him to insta!! special higli techiuque/speed machine. The Hon'ble Court may kindiy be pleased to dirsct to Respondents to follow tlie State Purchase Rules 2002 as mandaton' and allotted work preferentiallv to the psuiioiisf s uiciusinss. '• ^S>T''-';_~;:\ ''^r <• lfem.-.-.. t .5^^^^ ^ &. 10.5. Aiiy omer relief/reliefs which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit aud prooer iii the faets aiid circumstaiices of the case with cost ofthe petition may also please be gi-anted to the pctitioner, in the intei'est ofjustice." By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to a'ant processing work iacl'iiding dyeiiig and finishing of cloth up to the inaximum processing capacitv offhe petitioner. Shri Nande farther submits tliat the petitioner has seiit a communicatioa dated 30 May, 2008 (.''iiinexiire P/7) to the respondent NTo. 2 for grant of processing work, but the said work was not allotted to the petitioner and was assisned to the industries situated out ofthe State. It is for the State Govermaent to graat processing work iacluding dveing a.'ad linishins of cloth up to the maximum procsssins eapac.itv ofthe petitjoner. The petitioner caimot claim it as a mattsr ofrigl-it and the quality and quantity has to be decided by the respondents. Tlie petitioner f.irther seeks a directioii to the respondests to follow &e provisions oftlie State Purchase Rules, 2002 (for short "the Rules, 2002'). Tlie petitioner has not pointed out any spe.cific inE.tance or order which is violative ofany ofthe provisions ofRules, 2002. It is presumed thal the govemment officials always foliow the statutory niles, until and unless it is shown by any specific instance or order that the same has not been followed. Tlius, no relief can be gi-anted m such a vague petition like this. So far as alleaation ofharassment to the petitioner is concemed, it comes within the pun'iew of eriminal offence, and if it is so, the oetitioner mav take reeourse to provisions of the C.ode of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by iodsing a complaint to the Police and thereafter, if te petitioner is not satisfied- he may file a compiamt case before the Magistrate. The petitioner has not made out anv case wan-antm.e. mterfsrence by •this Court. Tlius, the petition, being devoid of nierit, is accordingiy dismissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge