M^^i''"1^' ^ ' i.S( S>'^ iNyisii R^' c^ 1-so IN THE fflGH COURT OT CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (s) No. PETmONER : ,. -^amhau Ram Chandravanshi S/o Shri ...;-A\..--" Chainu Ram Chaadravanshi aged ' ^t^..-- •••""about 38 years, Assistant - Teacher ^ry.^i'<y:-?' ..•••''' Govt- Primary School Pendridih .* .<.*.''s\ v. ^^' ^yy- ^-•"" Bloek Churia Distt. Rajnaadgaon VERSVS RESPONDENTS: 1:^ State of Chhattisgarh Through f^ Seeretary Department &f Edueation Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2>- Distriet Education Officer, Chhuria, Distriet Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3: Block Education Officer Block- CUiuria Distriet-Rajnaadgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETmON U/A 226/27^ OF THE CONSTITUTION INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WMTS IN NATUSE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOROTHER SUrTABLE WRFFSAN& DffiECTIONS The above named petitioner most humbly aad respeetfully begs to subaut as under:- HI6HC<XSTOF_CHHAmS6AftH AT BUASPUR SIN6LE BENCH ; HON'BLE NR SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. Petjtioner WRTT PETTTEON fS.l No. 489 OF 2007 Hemant kumar Choure RBSpondents vwrsus S'tate of Chhattisgarh md others And WMT PFTTTION tS.) No. 490 OF 2007 PetitionBr : ftamhou Rom Chandrwanahi versus Respondents State of ChhaWagarh and otiiers Present : AArs. Ranjana Jaiswal, counset for Ae petitioner(s). Mr. Arv'md Oubey,Panel lafyer for the re^wndents/State. OR&ER (Passed on -this 25th Dayof Jonuury. 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for tiie Sftite/respondents jointfy submit that the facts ond question of faw involved in the present batch of writ petitions are squorely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of yashwmri' KUHW Wiaradwaj'wt. Munle^fol Cwpwvtton, tfwy end ewmthci^ . 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (6op»sh Kumar ywma vs. Thc State Gcvt. af ChlwW9gw4i and awfliei^ and other connectedl matters, decided by •this Court' on 15-12- 2006, purauent to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by Ihe Secretary, Board of Secondary Educathm, Bbopal and Ihe prospechjs of Dyloma in Educatton Exomtination, it wos ctoa'ified that the nomenclcrture of the Basic Training Institute, K., B.TJ. has been chan9ed ond renained as Diploma m Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordmgty, Ihe D.Ed. Cerl-ificute holdersare alsocovered by •the decision h Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (Sofwsh Kumar Vermavs. The Siaie Sovt. of (Wwttisgearh and anotfiei) (Supra). 3. For -the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions ons (fiaposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in -the matt'er of Yashwait Kumar <»vdwaj (Supra), subject t6 verifiaation of •the fact as to whe+her the petitioners have acquired B.TX/D.Ed. Certificartes at their ow>n expenses as per the circulars ckrfed 24-12-1998 cnd 1-3-1999 and ler whether they have been paid two advance mcrements ornot. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of -this order be placed on the record of Ihe connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006(U)MPJR-C696 SuUwsh