1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR W.P.No. 4218/2007 Union of India, through General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai CST and another. vs. Ramesh U. Dhekate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : A.P. Lavande & R.V.More,JJ DATE : 23.10.2007 Heard Ms U.R.Tanna, learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners by this petition challenge the order dated 23rd March, 2007 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, Camp at Nagpur in Original Application No. 2045/2006 by which the petitioners have been directed to pay to the respondent the difference between 50% and 75% of subsistence allowance for the period 29.11.2003 till 30.6.2005 in the form of arrears of wages along with interest @ 9% p.a. calculated on month to month basis. The petitioners have been further directed to pay the amount within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the order. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and having perused the impugned order and the records we find no ground to interfere in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In 2` our opinion, the Central Administrative Tribunal has correctly interpreted the Rule 2043- RII and has granted the difference in subsistence allowance. We find no illegality or perversity in the findings recorded by the Central Administrative Tribunal and hence no interference is called for. The petition is, therefore, summarily rejected. Judge Judge patle