IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2007 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 126 OF 2007 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 126 OF 2007 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 126 OF 2007 Sou.Prafullata Ramesh Kargave (Kamble). ... Applicant. V/s. Shri Ramesh B. Kargave (Kamble) and others. ... Respondents. A.P.Vararase for the applicant. Ms.S.D.Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 5th October 2007. DATED: 5th October 2007. DATED: 5th October 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This application is filed for condonation of 879 days delay in filing revision application. The substantive revision application is directed against the order dated 7th July, 2004 passed in Criminal Appeal No.1/2001 by the Additional District Judge, Gadhinglaj, whereby the conviction of the accused under section 498-A read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code was maintained by reducing the sentence till rising of the Court with further modification to credit the compensation amount of Rs.5,000/- in the Government’s account. 3. The order appears to have been already executed. This revision application is filed after expiry of 879 days. The explanation furnished can hardly be said to be a sufficient cause to condone delay. 4. In that view of the matter, no case is made out to issue notice to the respondents on the prayer of condonation of delay. Application is, thus dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE