^Q). ^ ^!L^'?^r'' •i^ii^<..^T^ . IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writi>etition No. 3^c^ /2005 Petitioner ^ v< Latel Ram aged 65 years son of Banwali Yadaw resident of village Hanfa Road, Sakri, Tahsil Takhatpur, Disst. Bilaspur (C.G.) ^^' •^s- Respondent - 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Principle Secretary VERSUS Jail C. G. Govt., Mantralaya D.K. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Inspector General of Jail, Chhattisgarh Raipur (C.G.) 3. Superintendent ofJail, Disst. Ambikapur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. OUO WARRANTO. PROHIBITION AND / OR ANY OTHER WRIT/ ORDER / DIRECTION ON THE SAME NATURE IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE ^- \^ *<WW8»*IT^b' ~3~^[ ';:qraT^T, '3~atw<S, f^TRPH ^^.^±^.M^..^''.. •^200 S^-c--^;Cc^3^?) ^H^T^I'^W "^i'sn^i'i^w '^^i^'^fi^ ^n^f? '^TSit^ft^-qp^f-^ '7t<<^ZR ^ 3T^R ^ ^f SBj HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE t>RITXNKER DIWAKER 08.11.2011 +• None for the petltioner. Since none appears for the case is called in the secon41 other option but to dismiss th^ prosecution. Accordingly, the writ peti| of prosecution. :he petitioner even when round, thjs court has no writ petition for want of fcion is dlsmissed for want Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge 5 '^n^r, <s^{^{(^—FS/140—2/20t 1—1,50,000.