IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7991 of 2009 Between: Sri Revu Raju, S/o. Late Sri Appanna, Male, R/o. D.No. 36-95-105, Babujinagar, Kancharapalem Post, Visakhapatnam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Vice Admiral, Chief of Personnel, Eastern Naval Command, Visakhapatnam - 530014. 2 The F.O.C. in C., HQ Eastern Naval Command, Visakhapatnam – 530014. 3 The Material Superintendent, Material Organization, Visakhapatnam – 530014. 4 The Central Government Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour, Court, Hyderabad, Camping at Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI P.SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: ---- The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus to set aside order dated 29-01-2009 passed by respondent No.4-Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad (for short “the Tribunal”). Heard Sri P.Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner, and perused the record. By the impugned order, the Tribunal rejected the claim of the petitioner that the domestic enquiry was vitiated by violation of principles of natural justice and accordingly it held that the domestic enquiry was validly held. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner urged several contentions in support of the plea of the petitioner regarding the validity of the domestic enquiry, I am of the view that the petitioner can be permitted to raise all these contentions in the event an adverse award, on the merits of the case, is passed against him by the Tribunal, because it is not appropriate for this Court to undertake a piecemeal adjudication of the issues when the industrial dispute is still pending before the Tribunal. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the contentions, which are raised in this writ petition, while questioning the final award, it if goes against him. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition, WPMP No.10466 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 20th April, 2009 vrn