HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ‘ Writ Petiiion S No. 2994 ofi Petitioher ‘ Versus Respondents l (W eon under Arucle 226 of the Consutu (SB Hon’ble Shn Saush K Agmh S lvek Shanna Advocate for the petmoner Sn Am BILASPUR 2009 Gopilal Bharti, S/o Late Shn N R Bharh aged about 59 years Deputy Supenntendent of Pohce (head Qucxrter), Department of Home (Police), Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur(C G) The Supenntendent of Pohce JanJglr Champa, Dlstnct Janjgxr Champa (C G.}"' State of Chhatisgarh thmugh Secrétaxy, D.K.S. Janjglr Champa, Dlstnct Janlglr Champa (C G) 11011 of Indla) otnJ) hn V h rvd Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the respondents. Hard e. Lene counsel appealing for the petitioner, on instructions, mis that the petitioner does not want to contest this matter on merits and prays for Wlthdrawal ot the Writ petition owever the respondents may be directed to cons1der and de the pending representatlon (Annexure P14). Learned coerciye steps may be taken against the petitioner._ tha th pending representation; if any, shall be considered an t e d pe‘od of three weeks. ard subt H ecxd el d n t s e taken. Vi rdr a s oe sto cost o R D E R 1on1) ( Passed on this 26th day ofJnne, 2009 ) couns further submits that till the representation is decided, Learned counsel appearing for the respondents] State submits ecided, in acoordance with law, on its own merits, within a I i ordered, accordingly. It isexpected that the pending representation would be decided by the respondents within a priod of three weeks and till then no coercive steps shall be In ew of the mregomg, the Wnt petition stands disposed of No R Sd/— batlsh K Agmhotrl Judg mt Ptm r e no