1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4818 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2783 OF 2007 Gangaram Tukaram Patil .. Petitioner. Vs. Manohar Dhondiram Divate & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Amit Borkar for the petitioner. Mrs.J.P.Akolkar for respondent no.1. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 31ST JULY, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The writ petition is directed against an order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Karveer, in TNC/20/2003 dated 28.9.2005. The petitioner filed revision application bearing No.TNC/REV/KOP/203/205 against the order dated 28.9.2005 before the Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune. The revision was filed before the Divisional Commissioner in view of the fact that the State of Maharashtra had abolished the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal. In the revision, the prayer for stay of the impugned order was rejected. Hence the petitioner filed the present writ petition. In the writ petition, the interim order as prayed, was granted and it operates till this date. Now the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal is available for deciding the revision applications those were filed and pending before the Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune. In view thereof I do not 2 deem it necessary to keep this petition pending any further. Hence the following order: The Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal shall endeavour to decide the revision filed by the petitioner expeditiously. Interim relief granted by this court pending this writ petition for admission shall remain operative till disposal of the revision application before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal. It is open to the petitioners to file appropriate application before the tribunal for bringing the legal heirs and representatives of the deceased – respondent no.1 on record within a period of four weeks from today. With these observations the writ petition and the civil application is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)