1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Criminal Jurisdiction) Tuesday, the Twenty Seventh day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH CRL OP(MD)No.11567 of 2011 1 VALLI THEVAR 2 CHELLAMMAL 3 THANGATHAI 4 THIRUMALAIMUTHU 5 ARUMUGASAMY 6 CHELLADURAI 7 ESAKKIMUTH 8 MUTHUKUTTI 9 PETCHIMUTHU S/O.VALLI THEVAR 10 MARIAMMAL 11 VALLITHAI D/O.MURUGAIAH THEVAR 12 MUTHUSAMY 13 PETCHIMUTHU S/O.MURUGAIAH THEVAR 14 VALLITHAI W/O.RAMAIAH THEVAR :PETITIONERS / ACCUSED -Vs- THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AYIKUDI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. :RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. N.MOHIDEEN BASHA Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. ORDER:The Court Made the following order:- The petitioners are arrayed as A2 to A15 and they apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 465, 468 r/w 34 I.P.C., in Crime No.87 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State. 3.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners are arrayed as A2 to A15 and the allegation made in the complaint is that the petitioners have prevented the de-facto complainant from ploughing the land purchased by him by registered sale deed and obstructing by stating that they are the legal heirs of Chellamuth Thevar. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.Considering the nature of allegation, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. With certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Shenkottai and each of them executing a personal bone for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners No.2, 3, 10, 11 & 14 are ladies shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation in so far as the other petitioners are concerned shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 27/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO: 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Shenkottai, Tirunelveli District. 2.-Do-Thro' The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4.The Inspector of Police, Ayikudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District. +1. CC to M/S. N.MOHIDEEN BASHA Advocate SR.No.33512. RP/29.09.2011/2P/6C. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11567/2011 Date :27/09/2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/