1N THE Ema coma OF Janicyrugg ”AT JABALPUR r‘ (wRIT PETI'rxoN UNDER ARTICLE 225/227 OF m}: cous'rl'rU'rloN or INDIA) WRIT PE'rnioN N5?§§(1999. ‘PETITIONERs: 1. ”Geeténjélirqrih Nriman sahkari Samiti A my; society.\regi'stered under the provisionsbf mad'hya Pradesh cooperativ society Act“; 1960. bearingvregistrav No .DRP/RPR/68/89-81 , having its office at Geetanjau Nagar.”Ra1pur(MP). Pxakaéh bavda s/o W Mayan ‘Lal Davda'. aged about 47 ygars. President Géetanja'li Grih Human ,Sahkari- Samiti Geetanjali'Nagar, Raipg (mPr). //Versus// 1. S£até of Madhya Praées'h, Through tha Secmtary. cooperativé Department. Vallabh Bhawan. Bhopal (MP). RESPONDENTS: 20 shri M0K0raaut. Collector'Jiaipur (m). 3. Thé Joint Director, Town and Country Planning Department; Raipnr (MP). 4. Thé Dy.Régistrar.Cooperat1ve societies (Package). Raipur (MP) 5. The Manager, District Ccoperative Central Bank. Raipur: (MP). 6. The Municipal, Cgrparation.Raipur (MPhm/ 7.,‘eshri s .K. Dixit , Audit 0f ficer. Coopé rativé L socie ties . (Cooperative Audit ) , Raipur (FIP) . wan; PETITION CONswIwTIoN UNDER AaTIcLt226/227 OF INDIA OF m2 1. Particulars of the petitioners; As detailed above in cause title. 2. Particulars of _t_he respondents: As detailed above in cause titleo' 3. Particularstf the ordereagainst Ehich writ petition is made. The petitioaers have filed the instant writ pet ition against the follcwing Orde rs :- e . HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETlTlON NO.522 OF 1999 PETITIONERS Geetanjali Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti & Another Versus RESPONDENTS State-of Madhya Pradesh &" Others 1 (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- None for the petitioners. Shri A.v. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ’t A ORDER gORAL) (Passed on this 8‘“ day of December, 2010) 1‘. The matter is called for hearing. None appears*nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioners. The petitioners may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. ln View of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Registry is directed to fonNard a copy of this order to the petitioners forthwith. W Sdl- sattsh K. W0? t Jutdge j Arun '