IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6865 of 2008 MD.JAWED Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 18/07/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that while the informant was going on his motorcycle in the evening of 27.9.2007, he was apprehended by two unknown persons and Rs.49,500/- was snatched away from him. Petitioner was later on apprehended by the police and he is in custody since 11.10.2007. It is said that no recovery was made from the petitioner whereas from the other accused persons arrested, recovery of incriminating money and mobile was made. In the F.I.R., informant has specifically stated that if he is given a chance, he could identify the accused persons. In spite of that, police has not put this petitioner on T.I.Parade. Case diary was called for in the case. Confessional statement of the petitioner is recorded in the case diary but it is submitted that the same is not admissible as that was extracted by the police on coercion. It is said - 2 - that there is another case against the petitioner in which also petitioner was falsely implicated in which petitioner is on bail vide Cr.Misc.No.24416 of 2007. In the circumstances, in view of the fact that in spite of the claim of the informant that he could identify the culprits by face, petitioner has not been put on T.I.Parade and the police has submitted chargesheet without getting him identified by the informant and in view of the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 11.10.2007, this application is allowed. Let petitioner Md.Jawed be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 1st additional Sessions Judge, Gaya in Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S.Case No.148 of 2007. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)