IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 26TH MAY 2010/ 5TH JYAISHTA 1932 Mat.Appeal.No. 119 of 2009(E) ---------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN O.S.NO.176/2005 AND THE ORDERS IN I.A.NO.2733/2007 AND 2734/2007 OF FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKKARA APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS ------------------------------------ 1. NAZEER, S/O.MUHAMMED RAWTHER, NAZIYA MANZIL, IRAVICHIRA KIZHAKKE MURI, SOORANADU VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. MUHAMMED RAWTHER, KAROORVILA KIZHAKKATHIL VEEDU, KAMPALADI MURI, PORUVAZHI VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR, KOLLAM 3. SUBAIDA BEEVI, W/O.MUHAMMED RAWTHER, KAROORVILA KIZHAKKATHIL VEEDU, KAMPALADI MURI, PORUVAZHI VILLAGE, KUNNATHOOR, KOLLAM BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT : PLAINTIFF ------------------------ SHAHIDA BEEVI, D/O.SUBAIDA BEEVI, PLAVILA VADAKKATHIL VEEDU, PADINJATTINKARA MURI, KOTTARAKKARA VILLAGE, KOLLAM. ADV. SRI.VINOY VARGHESE KALLUMOOTTILL FOR R1 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ********************** C.M.Appl.No.335 of 2009 & Mat.Appeal No.119 of 2009 ********************* Dated this the 26th day of May, 2010 ORDER/JUDGMENT The order dated 03.12.2009 has not been complied with. Compliance ought to have been made by 03.02.2010. The counsel prays for time to comply with the direction. We are not persuaded to agree that any extension of time deserves to be granted at this point of time. 2. Accordingly the petition for condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently the Mat.Appeal shall stand rejected as barred by limitation. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) rtr/