C.W.P. No.6585 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.6585 of 2009 Date of Decision.04.08.2011 Rajinderpal Singh son of Amrik Singh, Shop No.683/4-12, Bazar Kaserian, Amritsar .....Petitioner Versus Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jallandhar and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Mittal, Addl. A.G., Punjab for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Sukhbir Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. At the hearing on 21.07.2010, this Court has sought to illicit information that if after demolition of building, the SGPC was proposing to construct any new shop. This was done under the peculiar circumstances when the petitioner was ordered to be evicted in accordance with law in the proceedings taken under Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent No.3 states that there are no proposals for putting up any new constructions in the place, which is proposed to be demolished and produces before Court a decision taken by SGPC. The petitioner has been lawfully evicted and the question of C.W.P. No.6585 of 2009 -2- consideration of allotment of a new consideration does not arise in view of the decision taken that there is no proposal for reconstruction. 3. The writ petition is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 04, 2011 Pankaj*