C.W.P.No. 10487 of 2008. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P.No. 10487 of 2008. DECIDED ON : July 08,2008 Jai Gopal and another Petitioners. VERSUS The Commissioner Rohtak Division etc. Respondents. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.S.KHEHAR. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. Vikram Punia, Advocate, for the petitioners. J.S.KHEHAR,J. Through the instant writ petition, the petitioners have impugned the order passed by the Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak, dated 14.2.2008, whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioners with the prayer that they should not be ejected from the land in question has been dismissed. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that originally the order of ejectment was passed against the petitioners by the Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Rohtak on 7.3.1979. The impugned order as well as the pleadings also reveal that the petitioners availed of all the remedies open to them. However, order of ejectment passed by the Assistant Collector Ist Grade Sonepat dated 7.3.1979 assumed finality. C.W.P.No. 10487 of 2008. 2 In view of the above, it is not possible for us to accept any infirmity in the order dated 14.2.2008 Accordingly, the prayer made in the instant petition for setting aside the impugned order dated 14.2.2008 is hereby dismissed. An alternative prayer has also been made by the petitioners in the writ petition, namely that they should be allotted the land in their possession in terms of the notification dated 1.8.2001 (Annexure P-9). In this behalf the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners have originally moved an application dated 27.6.2005 seeking allotment under the notification referred to herein above, but no final decision has been taken thereon till date. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also invited our attention to the letter dated 21.4.2008 (Annexure P-8) showing that the matter in respect of assessing the market value of the land un-authorizedly in possession of the petitioners is still under the active consideration of the Deputy Commissioner, Sonepat. Therefore, the petitioners state that an appropriate direction be issued to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners in terms of the notification dated 1.8.2001 (Annexure P-9) by requiring the respondent i.e. the Collector Sonepat to take a final decision on the application dated 27.6.2005 (Annexure P-4). Without going into the merit of the case raised by the petitioner, in view of the innocuous prayer made by the C.W.P.No. 10487 of 2008. 3 learned counsel for the petitioners, we are of the view that the direction sought by the petitioners is called for. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 i.e. the Collector, Sonepat to take final decision on the representation dated 27.6.2005 (Annexure P-4) by passing well-reasoned speaking order within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Disposed of accordingly. A copy of this order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. ( J.S. KHEHAR ) JUDGE July 8,2008 ( JORA SINGH ) JUDGE