CWP No. 24397 of 2011 Satpal Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others Present: Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * * Having heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the averments made in the writ petition, we are of the view that instead of entertaining this writ petition, the petitioner should be left with the remedy of seeking impleadment in connected writ petition i.e. CWP No. 12447 of 2010, if he is so advised. Writ petition, therefore, is not being entertained any further. Closed in terms of the above. (RANJAN GOGOI) CHIEF JUSTICE (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 24.12.2011 Amodh