IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 6TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 5956 of 2009(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A. RASHMI PILLAI, D/O. GOPINATHAN PILLAI, KALPAKAM HOUSE, KARUNAGAPPALLY BY ADV. SRI.SUBHASH CYRIAC RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1 BHARATH SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS GNERALMANAGER, BSNL BHAVAN, VELLAYITTAMBALAM, KOLLAM. 2. SUB DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, BSNAL, KARUNAGAPPALLY ADV. SRI.MATHEWS K.PHILIP,SC, BSNL FOR R1-2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No.5956 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 25th day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that by Ext.P1, she sought shifting of her telephone now kept in her residential building to the petrol pump of which she is the dealer. Complaining of delay in passing orders on Ext.P1, this writ petition is filed. 2. The standing counsel appearing for the respondents on instruction submits that Ext.P1 application has not been received by the respondents. Although petitioner asserts of having filed Ext.P1, nothing has been placed on record to prove the correctness of the said contention. In the light of the submission made by the standing counsel for the respondents, the only course open to the petitioner is to file a fresh application before the concerned officer. WP(c).No.5956/09 /2/ Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the petitioner shall file a fresh application before the concerned officer along with a copy of this judgment. It is directed that if an application is so received, orders thereon shall be passed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 3 weeks thereafter. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.5956/09 /2/