IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.182 OF 2005. APPLICATION NO.182 OF 2005. APPLICATION NO.182 OF 2005. IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.497 OF 2004. APPEAL NO.497 OF 2004. APPEAL NO.497 OF 2004. Shri Nandu @ Ramanand Buddhan Gaund ...Applicant Versus. M/s.Jawahar Nagar Co-op. Housing Society Ltd & Anr. ...Respondents Ms R.C.Nichani for the Applicant. Shri J.J.Xavier for the Respondent No.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. 14th 14th 14th February, 2008. February, 2008. February, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard advocates appearing for the parties. The application is by the appellant in the First Appeal praying for injunction restraining the second respondent-Municipal Corporation from dispossessing the appellant from his alleged possession over the suit plot. The submission of the learned advocate for the applicant is that though the structure on the suit plot has been demolished by the second respondent Municipal Corporation, no evidence was led by the second respondent to show that the suit plot was acquired in accordance with law. She submitted that in absence of any evidence on record regarding acquisition of the suit plot, the second respondent cannot take law into its own hands and dispossess the applicant. Reliance is placed on several documents showing alleged possession of the applicant. : 2 : 2 : 2 : 2. I have considered the submissions. I have also perused the affidavit in reply as well as pleadings and notes of evidence. 3. Perusal of the plaint filed by the applicant shows that he is claiming to be the owner by adverse possession. Perusal of the examination-in-chief of the applicant shows that none of the ingredients of plea of of adverse possession are established by the applicant. The trial Court has dismissed the suit on merits. 4. No case is made out for granting discretionary and equitable relief of temporary injunction in favour of the applicant. Application is accordingly rejected. Judge. Judge. Judge.