CRM-M No. 32660 OF 2011 Jagdish and others v. State of Haryana Present: Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the petitioners. ****** Learned counsel has argued that the FIR is against the President and members of the Gram Sudhaar Samiti but the petitioners were not the members of the said Samiti on the said date. However, he has very fairly conceded that this prayer was not agitated before the Court below. In this view of the matter I deem it appropriate that this petition be not entertained but the petitioner be directed to re-agitate the prayer for anticipatory bail before the competent Court after raising this fundamental issue. For this purpose the earlier order dated 20.10.2011 passed by the learned trial Court would not be binding. (AJAY TEWARI) ` JUDGE October 31, 2011 sunita