THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5821 OF 2010 ORDER: The petitioners are the judgment debtors (J.Drs) in the suit filed by one Karedla Nancharamma being O.S.No.143 of 2000 for permanent injunction, which was decreed by the Court of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada, on 10.02.2004. The decree holder died and his legal representatives, respondents 2 to 7 are on record. They filed E.P.No.429 of 2009 under Order XXI Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for committing the judgment debtors to civil prison and also for ordering necessary police aid in implementing the decree. By an order dated 16.11.2010, the Court below while dismissing the E.P. against the fourth judgment debtor directed to issue arrest warrant to judgment debtors 1 to 3. Aggrieved by the same, J.Drs 2 and 3 filed the instant revision petition. By the time revision petition was filed, the petitioners herein were arrested and sent to civil prison. The arrest warrant was for a period of thirty (30) days. This Court, by order dated 15.12.2010 directed release of the petitioners on condition of each of them executing a personal bond of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) to the satisfaction of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada. This Court heard the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the decree holders. In their counter filed in E.P.No.429 of 2009, the petitioners denied that they interfered and alleged that they are in possession. When the decree for injunction was passed by the Court below recording a finding that the plaintiff was in possession of the property as on the date of the possession, they are bound by the decree and interference could have to be viewed seriously. As the petitioners already served ten (10) days in civil prison, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of observing that if there is any further interference, it shall be open to the decree holders to approach the Police Station concerned, who shall then see that the decree is properly respected by the judgment debtors. It shall also be open for the decree holders to file another E.P. for any further violation. No costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 27th September 2011 RRB