-^ HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. (Petitioner) 1. 2. 3. Savitri Devi, W/o. Shri Dindayal Agrawal, aged about -65 years, R/o. Thana Road, Raigarh, Tahsi! and District- Raigarh (C.G.) State of Chhattlsgarh, Through the Secreiary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S; Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) The Nazul Officer, Raigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) IT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2(1) OF THE T Shri Amit Sharma, learned counsei for the appeilant. Shri Kjshore Bhaduri, learned Additlonal Advocate General for the State/ respondents. >th order of the Court was passed Shri Kishore Bhaduri, learned Additiona! Advocate Genera) has raised a preiiminary objection about the mamtainability of the writ appeal cn the ground that the appellant's writ petition was heard and decided bythe learned Single Judge in exercise of the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of india_ ^''.?1 ^. o-^ 2) Shri Amit Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant, in viev/ of the abo'/e objection of learned Additional Advocate General seeks permission to withdraw the writ. appeal with the iberty of fiiing a Review Petition as the amended notification was not considered bythe learned Single Judge while passing the impugned order dated 23 September, 20Q8. 3) Permission granted. 4) Vrfith the above llberty, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Chief lusttce Sd/- SUNILKUMARSINHA Judge nimmi