IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 21257 of 1999 Between: 1 K.Seshagiri Rao S/o Surya Prakash Rao, Hyd., 2 Mohd. Fasihuddin S/o M.A. Rahman, Hyd., ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Govt of A.P., rep by its Prl Secreary, Panchayat Raj & Rule Devp Dept., Secretariat, Hyd., 2 The Govt of A.P., rep by its Prl Secrearyto GAD (Services), Secretariat, Hyd., 3 The Govt of A.P., rep by its Prl Secreary to Irrigation & CAD., A.P., Secretariat, Hyd., 4 K.M.V. SUBBA RAO Assit Executive Engineer, Office of the Chief Engineer, Irragation, Erramanzil, Hyd., 5 J.Srinivas, Assist Executive Engineer Office of the Chief Engineer Wing , Irragation, Erramanzil, Hyd., 6 R.Dayanand, Assist Executive Engineer Office of the Chief Engineer Wing , Irragation, Erramanzil, Hyd., 7 The A.P., Admn Tribunal, Rep by its Registrar, Pureni Haveli, Hyd., .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari, by calling for the records relating to and connected with judgment in OA. No.4951/96 and batch, dt 3-9-96 and quash or set aside the same in so far as the petitioners are concerned, as erroneous and unsustainable and consequently direct the State Govt in the Panchat Raj, Rural Devp and relief (Estt.II) Dept to give effect G.O.MS.290, DT 10-7-96 to accord the benefits to the petitioners that flow from the above G.O. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI Counsel for the Respondent No.: G.P. FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following : ORDER: (Per Sri V.Eswaraiah, J.) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by virtue of the interim order passed by this Court, no further orders are required to be passed as the petitioners have already retired from service. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. __________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. ____________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J. 18.6.2009 kpr