THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 24891 OF 2007 O R D E R: The petitioner was granted permission by the Grampanchayat, Husnabad on 26.4.2007, to construct a Rice Mill. On the strength of the permission, the petitioner started construction and was proceeding with the same. The Sarpanch of the village issued notice, dated 7.11.2007, directing the petitioner to stop construction, with a threat that the mill would be seized. Petitioner challenges the same. He contends that the mill is being constructed, strictly in accordance with the sanctioned plan, and there is no basis for the impugned notice. The contesting respondents ﬁled counter aﬃdavit, stating that the petitioner started construction, on a diﬀerent location, and that the functioning of the mill is causing sound and air pollution. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2 and learned counsel for respondents 3 to 23. It is not in dispute that the petitioner was accorded permission on 26.4.2007, to construct a Rice Mill. If any condition stipulated in the permission, is not complied with, or if the construction was being undertaken, in deviation of the sanctioned plan, it was always open to the Grampanchayat, to indicate the same and to take appropriate action. The impugned notice is as vague as it could be. The basis appears to be the objection raised by the neighbours. That hardly constitutes any basis. Though it was mentioned that the construction was made, contrary to the sanctioned plan, no details are furnished. Further, if at all respondents 3 to 23 are aggrieved by the permission accorded to the petitioner, they have to avail the remedies under the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act. While admitting the writ petition, this court directed that respondents 1 and 2 shall not interfere with the construction, as long as it is made in accordance with the sanctioned plan. It was also indicated that, in case, any deviations are noticed, the Grampanchayat may issue notice, pointing out the same. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, the writ petition is allowed, and the impugned notice is set aside. It is, however, made clear that it shall be open to the Grampanchayat to take action, in case, the construction was made in deviation of the sanctioned plan, and for the respondents 3 to 23, to work out their remedies, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ 12th November 2008 PAN