1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 19 OF 2010 Ketan Jayendra Dadia & ors ........appellants versus Yogita Ketan Dadia ........Respondent. Mr. Ravindra Parekh i/b Ravindra Parekh & Co. adv. for the appellants. Mr. Mohan Shetty adv. for the Respondent. CORAM: A.P. DESHPANDE AND SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATED : 6th May, 2010. P.C.: 1. During pendency of this appeal parties have resolved the dispute amicably by entering into settlement. The consent terms duly signed by the parties and their advocates are placed on record. Parties are present in the court. They admit the consent terms to be true and correct. Consent terms are taken on record and marked as `X’ for identification. The learned counsel for the respective parties make a joint request for disposal of the appeal in consent terms. Hence appeal stands disposed of in consent terms. The order passed by the Family court dated 7 th May 2009 in Application No. 201/08 in Petition No. A-1436/2004 is quashed and set aside. The consent terms shall substitute the order passed 2 by the Family Court dated 7-5-2009. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. C.C. Expedited. (A.P.DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J.)