IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1619 of 2008 SMT. NISHA Versus DR. RAJNI KANT RAJNISH ----------- 10 05.08.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Neelam Kumari Sinha v. Shree Prashant Kumar(2010(3) PLJR 632) neither civil revision nor miscellaneous appeal would be maintainable against the impugned order. However, as per the observation in the aforesaid decision of the Full Bench of this Court, it is submitted that the petitioner be permitted to convert this civil revision into a writ application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India upon fulfilment of requisite conditions. Permission is accorded Let the petitioner convert this civil revision into a writ application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India within two weeks, failing which it shall stand rejected as not maintainable without further reference to a Bench. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)