IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-23061 of 2009 (O&M) Subhash Rani .. Petitioner vs State of Punjab and another .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Jaideep Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. K. S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Jasjeet Singh, Advocate, for respondent no. 2. Rajesh Bindal, J. Prayer in the petition is for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent no. 2 by the learned Sessions Judge, Rupnagar in FIR No. 87 dated 17.5.2009 registered under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC, at Police Station City Rupnagar. The proceedings in the present case arise out of a matrimonial dispute. Respondent no. 2 is the husband of the petitioner. It is not in dispute that after the grant of pre-arrest bail, respondent no. 2 joined the investigation and thereafter even challan has also been presented. Both the parties are educated, as the petitioner is a teacher whereas respondent no. 2 is employed as clerk in the BSNL. One of the grounds raised for cancellation of bail is that recovery of dowry articles is to be effected. In my opinion, this cannot be a valid ground for seeking cancellation of bail. It is a matter of trial, as to how much dowry was given and in whose custody the same is. Considering the aforesaid facts, I do not find this to be a fit case for cancellation of bail. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. 20.7.2011 (Rajesh Bindal ) vs Judge