Crl. Revision No-M-9108 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc-No. M-9108 of 2011 Date of Decision: 07 November,2011 Gaurav .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI Present: :-Mr. R.S. Rai, Senior Advocate with Gautam Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG Haryana. Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate for complainant. M.M.S.BEDI, J. The petitioner along with Sunil is alleged to have fired upon Bhavi Chand and Kunj Bihari. Counsel for the complainant has intervened and opposed the application of bail along with learned counsel for the State. On asking of Court it has been informed that seven witnesses have already been examined and remaining witnesses would be examined within a period of two months. Counsel for the petitioner sumits that injured witnesses have already been examined and Bhavi Chand remained in hospital from 27th October, 2010 till 4th November,2010 on account of injury which was not grivous in nature. Taking into consideration the totality of all the circumstaces and believing that petitioner has been in custody with effect from 29th Crl. Revision No-M-9108 of 2011 2 October, 2010, it has been assured by counsel for the complainant as well as counsel for State that within a period of two months all the formal witnesses would be examined. Without expression of any opinion on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with observations that petitioner will be released on bail by the trial Court after expiry of two months in case the trial is not concluded by said date. Petition stands disposed of. 7.11.2011 (M.M.S. BEDI) aarti JUDGE