IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15604 of 2009 MOST.PHULWASIA DEVI Versus PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION with CWJC No.15605 of 2009 RAJMATI DEVI Versus PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. with CWJC No.15606 of 2009 VINOD KUMAR MANJHI Versus PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. ----------- 2. 17.11.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the respondent-Municipal Corporation and the State as also the learned counsel appearing for Life Insurance Corporation in C.W.J.C. Nos. 15605 and 15606 of 2009. The grievance of the petitioners is with regard to the payment of their retiral dues and other dues as highlighted in the respective writ applications. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Municipal Corporation submits that in case the petitioners file fresh representation separately stating the details of their claims distinctly, the same shall be considered as per law. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in the respective writ applications, the petitioners propose to file fresh representation separately before the respondent- Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. In case such representations are filed stating the details of their claims separately as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if 2 any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the above respondent shall consider the grievances of the petitioners as raised in their representations and dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations, so that the admitted dues could be paid to the petitioners with statutory interest, if any, without further delay. These writ applications stand disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)