1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO 3112/2009 (Vitthal Vs. State) with CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3230 OF 2009 (Rajkumar Vs. State) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. B.R.Kedar and Mr. U.B. Bilolikar, Counsel, for the respective applicants. Mr. D.R.Korde, APP, for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 15/9/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr. Bilolikar, Counsel, for applicant/complainant in CA No.3230/2009. complainant desires to assist learned A.P.P. I do not see any reason not to allow the application as it will be resolving the controversy on merits. Application (No. 3230/2009) allowed. 2. The accused/applicants are seeking pre-arrest bail in 2 terms of Section 438 Cr.P.C. in Crime No.50/2009, registered for an offense under Section 326 and various other Sections of IPC, including of rioting at Mukramabad Police Station. The other accused involved are already subjected to arrest. 3. Accused nos. 1, 2 and 3 herein are named in the FIR with specific roles, however, I find that accused no.3 is a distant relative of other accused, resides at Aurad, away from the place of incident. Though Counsel submits that he was not present at the place of incident, however, two witnesses implicate him. Considering his age to be 42 years and he being engaged in agricultural activities, without any other criminal antecedents and the role attributed to him, it is only the accused/applicant no.3 Sangram deserves pre-arrest bail. The other two accused applicant no.1 Vitthal and applicant no.2 Shivraj are attributed with specific roles and deadly weapons 3 are to be recovered. The medical certificate shows grievous injury. ORDER (a) Application by applicant no.1 Vithal and applicant no.2 Shivraj is rejected. b) In the event of arrest of accused/applicant no.3 Sangram s/o Madhavrao Sundale, he be released on furnishing P.R. bond and surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rs.fifteen thousand),till chargesheet. c) The accused applicant No.3 Sangram shall attend the investigator on every Sunday between 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. till filing of chargesheet. He will not influence the witnesses/the injured. Application disposed of with above directions. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/3112-09craplgr