IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.756 of 2009 1.JAI PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SURENDER PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAHARUAN, P.O. GARKHA, DISTRICT- CHAPRA(SARAN). 2.SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SHREE RAMDEV SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DUMARIA, P.O. GARKHA, DISTRICT- CHAPRA(SARAN). 3.JAMAL NASIR SON OF VAKIL ANSARI, RESIDEN OF VILLAGE-BEDWALIA, P.O- GARKHA, DISTRICT- CHAPRA(SARAN). …………APPELLANTS. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 2.SANTOSH KUMAR, S/O SHRI LAXMI NARAYAN SINGH, R/O VILLAGE, DUMARIA, P.O.- GARKHA, P.S. BHELDI, DISTRICT- SARAN. (PETITIONER/RESPONDENT). 3.THE DIRECTOR PRIMARY EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA.(RESPONDENT NO. 2). 4.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SARAN, CHAPRA. (RESPONDENT NO. 3). 5.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SARAN, CHAPRA.(RESPONDENT NO. 4). 6.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, AMNOUR, DISTRICT-SARAN.(RESPONDENT NO. 5). 7.THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, AMNOUR, DISTRICT-SARAN. (RESPONDENT NO. 6). 8.THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, RAIPURA, P.S.-BHELDI, DISTRICT-SARAN.(RESPONDENT NO. 7). 9.THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, RAIPURA, P.S.-BHELDI, DISTRICT- SARAN.(RESPONDENT NO. 8). …………RESPONDENTS. with LPA No.758 of 2009 1.JAI PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SURENDER PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAHARUAN, P.O. GARKHA, DISTRICT- CHAPRA(SARAN). 2.SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SHREE RAMDEV SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DUMARIA, P.O. GARKHA, DISTRICT- CHAPRA(SARAN). 3.JAMAL NASIR SON OF VAKIL ANSARI, RESIDEN OF VILLAGE-BEDWALIA, P.O- GARKHA, DISTRICT- CHAPRA(SARAN). …………APPELLANTS. Versus 2 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 2.RAGNI KUMARI, W/O SUJIT SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-SARAIBAKSH, P.O.- GARKHA, P.S.- BHELDI,DISTRICT- SARAN. (PETITIONER/RESPONDENT). 3.THE SECRETARY PRIMARY EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA.(RESPONDENT NO. 2). 4.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SARAN, CHAPRA. (RESPONDENT NO. 3). 5.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SARAN, CHAPRA.(RESPONDENT NO. 4). 6.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, AMNOUR, DISTRICT-SARAN.(RESPONDENT NO. 5). 7.THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, AMNOUR, DISTRICT-SARAN. (RESPONDENT NO. 6). 8.THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, RAIPURA, P.S.-BHELDI, DISTRICT-SARAN.(RESPONDENT NO. 7). 9.THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, RAIPURA, P.S.-BHELDI, DISTRICT- SARAN.(RESPONDENT NO. 8). …………RESPONDENTS. with LPA No.774 of 2009 1.JAI PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SURENDER PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAHARUAN, P.O. GARKHA, DISTRICT- CHAPRA(SARAN). 2.SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SHREE RAMDEV SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DUMARIA, P.O. GARKHA, DISTRICT- CHAPRA(SARAN). 3.JAMAL NASIR SON OF VAKIL ANSARI, RESIDEN OF VILLAGE-BEDWALIA, P.O- GARKHA, DISTRICT- CHAPRA(SARAN). …………APPELLANTS. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA. 2.PUSHPA KUMARI, W/O TARKESHWAR SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-SARAIBAKSH, P.O.- GARKHA, P.S.- BHELDI,DISTRICT- SARAN. (PETITIONER). 3.THE DIRECTOR PRIMARY EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA.(RESPONDENT NO. 2). 4.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SARAN, CHAPRA. (RESPONDENT NO. 3). 5.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SARAN, CHAPRA.(RESPONDENT NO. 4). 6.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, AMNOUR, DISTRICT-SARAN.(RESPONDENT NO. 5). 3 7.THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, AMNOUR, DISTRICT-SARAN. (RESPONDENT NO. 6). 8.THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, RAIPURA, P.S.-BHELDI, DISTRICT-SARAN.(RESPONDENT NO. 7). 9.THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, RAIPURA, P.S.-BHELDI, DISTRICT- SARAN.(RESPONDENT NO. 8). ……………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 07/ 11.01.2011 Counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw these appeals informing this Court that the issues raised in these appeals are now pending before the District Teachers Appellate Tribunal. Counsel for the State is present and has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. That being so, these appeals are permitted to be withdrawn in order to enable the appellants to pursue their remedy before the aforesaid Tribunal who will dispose of the matter in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Ranjan (T. Meena Kumari,J) (Mihir Kumar Jha,J)