1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 966 of 2008 RAM SINGH V/S KESHRI SINGH Mr. VK SHARMA, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 24.10.2008 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE SHRI KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The appellant filed a revision against the order of the Debt Relief Court under section 17 of the Rajasthan Relief of Agricultural Indebtedness Act, 1957, which was dismissed. That order was challenged in writ petition, which too has been dismissed by holding, that no ground is made out for interference in concurrent findings of the courts below. That order is sought to be challenged before us by way of appeal. A look at section 17 shows, that thereunder a revision lies on the following grounds:- “(a) that the order is contrary to law; (b) that the court has exercised a 2 jurisdiction not vested in it by law or has failed to exercise a jurisdiction vested in it by law; (c) that the installments fixed under Sub-section (3) of section 11 are inequitable.” Suffice it to say, that even from a look at the order of the revisional court, it is clear that the order of the Debt Relief Court was not challenged on any of these grounds. The learned counsel for the appellant was pointedly asked, as to under which clause of section 17, the ground was raised before the learned revisional court and the learned counsel fairly admitted, that none of the grounds, as contemplated under section 17, was raised. In that view of the matter, we do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( KISHAN SWAROOP CHAUDHARI ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /m.asif/