IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE: BILAL NAZKI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 2805 & 3214 OF 2004 C.R.P. No. 2805 of 2004 (Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to revise the Order dated: 26-02-2003 and made in C.M.A. No. 6 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad preferred against the order of the Court of the XIX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad passed in I.A. No. 1446 of 2002 in O.S. No. 6981 dated: 02-01-2003) Between: Syed Ibrahim Quadri, S/o. Late Syed Ghouse Quadri, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 18-4-280/B/42/18, Khajanagar, Khaja Pahadi, Old Tadbund, Hyderabad. …..Petitioner in both the C.R.P. Nos. 2805 & 3214 of 2004 AND 1. Kamran Mirza, S/o. A. Samad. 2. Nariman Mirza, S/o. A. Samad. 3. Nausherwan Mirza, S/o. A. Samad. 4. Humayun Sakibai, W/o. Jabbar Mirza, D/o. A. Samad. (All are R/o. D. No. 6-3-577/2, Grace Villa, Khairatabad, Hyderabad) ……..Respondents in both the C.R.P. Nos. 2805 & 3214 of 2004 C.R.P. No. 3214 of 2004 (Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to revise the Order dated: 23-04-2003 and made in C.M.A. No. 298 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad preferred against the order of the Court of the XIX Junior Civil Judge, Hyderabad passed in I.A. No. 347 of 2003 in O.S. No. 6981 of 2002 dated: 29-03-2003) These petitions coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petitions and memo of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. C. Pandu Ranga Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner in both the C.R.P Nos. 2805 & 3214 of 2004 and of Mr. V. Venkata Ramana, Advocate for the Respondents both the C.R.P Nos. 2805 & 3214 of 2004, the Court observed that a suggestion was put to the learned counsel for the parties for appointment of a Commissioner to inspect the site as to who is amongst the parties in possession of the disputed land as on today and the learned counsel for the parties have no objection for appointment of a commissioner for that purpose; ..2.. Whereas this Hon`ble Court on this day i.e. 13-08-2004 appointed Mr. A. Ramanarayana, Advocate who is present in the Court for visiting the site in presence of the parties or their representatives and report to this Court s to who is in actual possession of the property in dispute; Therefore you namely; Mr. A. Ramanarayana, Advocate, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. are hereby appointed as Advocate Commissioner and you are directed to inspect the site in presence of the parties or their representatives as to who is amongst the parties in possession of the disputed land as on today and report to this Court as to who is in actual possession of the property in dispute. You are informed that your fee for this purpose is fixed at Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only), which shall be shared by both the parties equally and shall be paid directly to you. You are further directed to visit the said site on 15th August 2004 at 2.30. P.M and you need not give any notice to the parties or to their counsel as the parties are informed of this date through their counsel in the open court. You are directed to submit your report in this Court within a week after inspection. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 1. A. Ramanarayana, Advocate, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (BY SPECIAL MESSENGER with copies of petitions and memo of grounds and the material if any) 2. One spare copy. Ksv HIGH COURT Ksv Date of drafting: 17-08-2004 BNJ DATE: 13-08-2004 NOTE: LIST AFTER ONE WEEK ORDER C.R.P. No. 2805 & 3214 OF 2004 APPOINTMENT OF ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER