CRLR No. 88 of 2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By way of this revision, the revisionist/State of Uttarakhand has prayed for setting aside the order dated 06.02.2009 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Revision No. 23 of 2009, Bhagwan Singh & others Vs State of Uttarakhand & another in First Information Report No. 238 of 2008, under Sections 379, 411 of I.P.C. as well as Section 26 of the Forest Act. Brief facts of the case are that the learned Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar allowed the revision and dismissed the order dated 19.12.2008 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Khatima whereby, the Judicial Magistrate rejected the release application of the respondents. Learned Sessions Judge directed the tractor in question be released in favour of the respondents vide impugned order. Feeling aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the State of Uttarakhand preferred this revision before this Court. Heard Sri B.S. Parihar, learned Brief Holder for the State/revisionist and perused the record. After having heard learned counsel for the revisionist and perusing the record, I do not find any ground to interfere in the impugned order passed by the revsional court. The learned Sessions Judge has recorded the finding that the tractor in question is registered in the co-ownership of Bhagwan Singh, Prem Singh and Bishan Singh – the respondents and in case, the tractor is not released in favour of the respondents, it is kept standing at the police station, then defects may occur to it and the respondents shall also not be able to perform their agricultural work. I do not find any illegality, impropriety, incorrectness in the impugned order passed by the court below. The revision lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed in-limine. The stay order, if any, stands vacated. (B.C.K., J.) 20.10.2009 ASWAL