IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.7283 of 2000 Between: Shayam Ajmera S/o.A.Bheelaya Naik R/o. Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND The Principal of University College of Law, O.U Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent herein in canceling the admission of the petitioner in I-year LL.B Course as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional being opposed to Art 46 of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.SIMHADRI (Not present) Counsel for the Respondent: MR.K.RAMAKANTH REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: Questioning the action of the respondent in canceling the admission of the petitioner in the I-year LL.B. Course during 1999-2000 on the ground of delay in submitting Transfer Certificate, the present writ petition is filed. As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner in the morning, the matter was directed to be called at 2.15 PM. Even at 2.15 PM also when the matter is called none appears for the petitioner nor is there any representation made on his behalf. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that by lapse of time the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. _______________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 14.06.2005 Nsr ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Principal of University College of Law, O.U Hyderabad. 2 Two CD copies