IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2011 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1932 SA.No. 167 of 2000(C) --------------------- AS.1/1998 of DISTRICT COURT, LAKSHADWEEP OS.18/1992 of MUNSIFF COURT, AMINI .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENTS IN THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT/ DEFENDANTS IN SUIT ----------------------- 1. SHAIK, S/O.MELACHETTA KASMI KILTAN, U.T. OF LAKSHADWEEP. 2. KOYAHASSAN, S/O.KALKULAM ABDULKADER IN -DO - -DO- BY ADV. SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS --------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MELACHETTA MOHAMMEDKOYA S/O.AHAMMEDKOYA HAJI, KILTAN U.T. OF LAKSHADWEEP. 2. MELACHETTA MOHAMMED HUSSAIN S/O.AHAMMEDKOYA HAJI, IN -DO- -DO- ADV. SRI.P.V.MOHANAN THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. --------------------------------- S.A.No.167 of 2000 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of March, 2011 JUDGMENT It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants that the disputes between the parties have been settled before the Adalath. A compromise petition was filed before the Adalath. However, it is submitted that no award has been passed by the Adalath. In view of the compromise between the parties, the Second Appeal is closed. If it turns out that the matter is not finally settled, the appellants would be entitled to file a memo to that effect within a period of three months, in which case the Second Appeal shall stand restored. K.T.SANKARAN JUDGE csl