BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF «CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR C.G. WRIT PETITIOMC) w’3S [zoos Petitioner - K. B. Lal shrivastava & Son (HUF) ' Karta- ShriVKB. Lal Shrivastava Aged 67 years, Slo Late Shri Brij Mohan Lal Shrivastava, Address- G-4, Adarsh Nagar Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State Govt. of Chhattisg-arh Through-the Secretary, Mining Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bh’awan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. ‘ Coilector (Mining Section) Durg (C.G.) Dis“ r \Du'Vg-‘_ , ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF P HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH2AT BILASPUR (}s/ WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 3595 of 2009 K‘B.La1 Shrivastava & Son (HUF) Karta - Shri K.B.La1 Sfn‘ivastava Aged 67 years, S/o Late Shri Brij Mohan Lal Shrivastava, Address ~ G—4, Adarsh Nagar, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESI’ONDENTS : 1. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through — the Secretary, Mining Department Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector (Mining Section) Durg (C.G.) Distt. Durg. . PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ~ Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sac, Government Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER gORAL) (Passed on 20 day of July, 2009) \ _- Present: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage, however, the respondents may be directed to consider and decide the pending application dated _17'h August, 2006 (Annexure P/3) in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. 2. Shri Sao, learned counsel appearing for‘the State/respondents submits that the pending application, as aforestated, shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from / the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 3. In View of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of. i i!,,, . ‘ 5d]- l Satish K. Agnihotri, ‘ Judge