1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 61 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 51 OF 2008 Fehmida Abubakar Varakaya, .. Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. Vincent X. D Silva for the Applicant. ’ Ms. S.M. Dandekar, AGP., for respondent / State. CORAM : J. N. PATEL & SMT. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ DATE : 28TH JULY, 2009 P.C. : Heard. 2. This review petition is filed solely on the ground that dismissal of the petition has resulted in forfeiture of the rights of the petitioner for rehabilitation as per the policy of the State Government. 2 3. It is contended that Annexure E on the other hand “ ” confers such right on the petitioner as the petitioner claims to be in use and occupation of the unauthorised structure prior to the cut-off date. 4. We would like to make it clear that the petitioner has misconstrued our order. This Court while dismissing the petition has not foreclosed the right vested in the petitioner for resettlement as per the policy of the State Government and in accordance with the provisions of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971. If the petitioner is entitled for such resettlement, the petitioner can very well approach the competent authority in the matter. 5. With the aforesaid observations, we do not find any error apparent on the face of the record to review our order. The review petition stands dismissed with no order as to costs. ( J. N. PATEL, J) (SMT. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J)