IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No.1422 of 2006 Date of Decision:- 21.1.2008 Charanjit Singh ....Petitioner(s) through Ms.Deipa Dubey, Advocate vs. Paramjit Singh and others ....Respondent(s) through Mr.Jagmohan Ghuman, Advocate for No.1. Mr.G.S.Cheema, Sr.DAG, Punjab. *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) This contempt petition has been filed alleging inter alia, that despite the order dated 23.2.2006 passed by this Court in Crl.Misc.No.10061-M of 2006 whereby operation of an order passed under Section 146(1) Cr.P.C. was stayed, the respondents have deliberately and willfully violated the said interim order. Show cause notice was issued and in response thereto, respondents No.1,2 and 3 have filed their respective reply/affidavits. As per the averments made therein, no further action was taken pursuant to the Calendra under Section 145 Cr.P.C. after the ad interim order was passed by this Court. In other words, according to the official respondents, the said interim order has been given full effect by them. C.O.C.P. No.1422 of 2006 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, contends that the private respondents No.4 to 7 have been making attempts to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land and/or to destroy his crops. As regard to those allegations, the official respondents have contended that upon enquiry, no substance has been found in the same. Be that as it may, in view of the fact that this Court has issued certain interim directions in favour of the petitioner which are still operative, the official respondents are obligated to ensure that no one including the private respondents is allowed to disobey those directions. Disposed of. Rule discharged. January 21, 2008 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE