wywva, PETFFIQNERS 1 Tejnarayan ! Panciey, S/o:; Shri Tangeshwar, aged .abqut 45 years, Occupatlon SeneralStore 2 Sanjay S/o Shri Ravindra Vishwas, aged about 37 years, Occupation Readymade Garment 3 Vishal S/o Shri Rarasrarri,,aged about 25 . years,; Occupation Readymade.Garmerit : 4 QOTprakash S/o Shri Ghasiram jQgi, aged about 42, Occupation. Manihari Gerteral Store 5 Mohd. Dilwar, S/o ShEi.Md.: Kaiser, ag^d abQut 32 ;yeara, Occupation readymade Garment ;|S/o Shrip Teejram Deyapv . ag|d,ahoufi,:4§f,yeal's,:^ :QecypatioH ireadymatie-Garment. j , 7:^;Bho(3psingh,i S?or, :;,;lShri; -; - Narayansingh Papihar,,... ,aged'p abouf ;27 i years; OccupatiDn readymade Garment , i •• ^ . :: 8 Sandeep •Ghaterji',"S/G-',Shri^ Shyampad,, aged aboyt40'yea!re,j Occupation: readymade^Garment ^ 9 Mahesh Rgm, S/p; .TekFam?. • Devangan,^agsd,ab'out|45;years,?. OeeypatiQniCSenerall';StQreli ;.1|.^ i. j;,: 10 GoUFishankaf, S/o Rajaratn., Nishad, agec) about 40 years;,;| Oceupation Chanamurra. • 11 Amif- Ram Jagwani,, S/a Bfiagat | •Ram, aged aboiit ^35 : Oecupation readymade Qarmlent 12 ishwar •Lal^'iCpuhan,. .S/Or Ram, agee) | :aboyt ;i:42,; Qectipation readymade©armeiit .•/-r' III :1jl. m^ ^'s\': •U!E .1 :> •;. ^IF?-"^.^^"" /i;- .g.KSt bf2010 13 Narmada Prasad, S/o Ayodhya Prasacl, aged about 65 years, Occupation General Store • .14 Suresh . Kumar, S/o Late Ghanshyamdas Rqhda, j^ed about 32 years, Occupation Tea Statl ;::: : : •' '' ;::' ' 1! ^. 15 Vinay Kumar Indoliya, S/o; Shri Paras Ram Indolia, aged abbut 34 years, Occupation' readymade Garment i . 16 Vinod Kumar Indoliya, S/o Shri Paras Ram Indolia, aged afeout 34 years, Oceupation readymade Garment. l i ^ i 17 Rohit, S/o Birhal Devangan, iaged about49years,OccupationScrap Shop:'. ' I,. :•; ; ••^ • 1S Santosh, S/o Shn Ghasirarn Deyangan, aged aboyt 40 years, Ocjeupation Geheral Stpt'e | sl9^(3trja,t.Si'o:L.axminarayari,^a9ed abouf 40 years, Qccupatjjon readymadeGarment Surendra. S/Q Teejram Devangan, aged bpufc 35 years, Oceupationreadymades,©arment, All; are Wo, Sanjay^ Conpplex, Raigarh, Tahsii "& Distriet Raigarh 1 The Municipa! i CQrporation, | Raigarh - ; • ;\: : • :'T:, , :i;:': .,. : District Raigarh, ttiroygh' : its :1; Commjssioner. •it::.^ 'y. 2 Th& Collector, Raigarh, Ristrict.,y . . Raigarh : ; . , .-:.; LE226QFTHE i CONSI i!:! M'rs.MameedagiEidique.iGoynsel.ftirthepetitisnei^ '. B.D. Guru, Gounsei forrespcindentNp.jl.,; Smita ©hai,' Pane! lawyer forMih^ Collector, ••..;;(•?!; .1'-ti. 'lii :";$?li ;?;a Iffll llffi' ^gt:S$BB 'MMIis yi;'?-,:)tiii VSKSX9SiSS[' T- il; aiB:NiQiiBMiiBittii& IL The petitioners are ihe small slibp keepers, who are running their shops" jn Raigarh. According to the petitioners, they are running theirshops in Sanjay Complex, Raigarh. The petitioners have filed this petitibn on apprehension of theiF forceful dispossession for the fotiQWing rellefs: "10.1 That the Hon'ble Court be pleased to command the respondent by issuing a writ ofmandamusto provide ahd aliotthe of the petitioner in the Sanjay 1.2 10.3 • Or - : : :\ • f^lternativeiy, the respondents be directed notto evict tfte peti'tioners untessa^better alternative arrangemenf is provided to them in any other market/plaee. , That the respondent may be djrectgd to allot the shopstothepetitioners.anaother exjsting vegetable vendors of' Sanjay Complex, Raigarh,^ after its Pakka construction on a r63sonat:i!e subsidized rate.,:;, 1,: • / : . • : .:',;::' Any appropriate writ, directiott or i order mayalsokindly&epassedinfavouriofthie petitioner,;'which this Hon'ble | ,©Qyrt deems fit in the cireumstanees o^ the cause^ •-.; " ' .' '• - '.'.:!.:.]: aM.I3.(GlNo.439of2Q10 ftfter issuance of notice by this Court, the return has I been byrespondent No.1- Municipa! Gorporation.iPara2&3 ofthe returnreadsas under: ' 2. It is submitted that flre instant writ petition has -been frled by the petilioners/vendors by placing misconceived and ineQrrect facts. The answgrihg respondent herewith submits a copy ofthe lay out pian for Sanjay Complex as ANNEXURE - R/1. Fromthe said lay out it can.be seen that the petitioners are operating their respective business in the area markedwith red ink shades and the answering respondent is notat all disturbing them and presently there is no proposal for evicting the present petitioners from the area marked with red ink shades in the lay out of Sanjay Complex. 3. It is submitted that if the area/premises in which the petitioners are operating their respective business for their livelihood i.e. area marked with red ink shades, is required in future by the answering respondent for any purpose, the petitioners wiil be rehabilitated properly by allotting them proper place and they wili not be disturbed in any manner from earning their liveiihood. Hence, the instant writ petition deservesto be dismissed." ~ In light of the contentsof para 2 & 3 of the return, it Is clear that presently, the Corporation is not at all disturbing the petitioners and there is no proposal for evicting the petitioners from the area marked with red ink shades in t'ne lay oyt fiied by the respondent. •'S.-5 :':1.::;-, , r.P.(GlNQ.439oT2010 . B.D. Guru, learned counsel for respondent No.1 aisosubmitsliketheabove.^ . In yiew of the above factual. scenario and the categorical statementmade byttie Corporatior!, Ijdbnot cleem it necessary t6 p@ss any order in ttieipreseht writ petitjon^at thisstag&. ! v • : • , - The writ petitidn, therefore, is disposed of at. this stage. : . : , .:./ • :; . ,.,. - -' 'y. • , However, the petitioners shal 1 be at Jiberty to approaeh thisCourt,asandwhensuchanexigencyiarisesin;future. Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge ^, i.fc=s