IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 196 of 2011 Date of decision: 11.10.2011 M/s Jyoti Automobiles …Petitioner. Versus Santosh Kumari & another …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. N.K. Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) The petitioner, by means of this petition, has challenged the order dated 05.02.2011, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. III, Una, whereby the application filed by the petitioner praying that the respondents-landlord be directed to install electric meter, to repair the shop and to place two shutters in the shop premises has been rejected. 2. The case of the petitioner is that a portion of the premises, which were rented out to him, were acquired by the State of Himachal Pradesh for widening of the road and during the process of widening, the front shutters of the shop etc. have been 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? -: 2 :- demolished and the electricity connection has also been cut. Therefore, he has prayed that the landlord be directed to install electric meter, to repair the shop and to place two shutters in the shop premises. 3. In my view, such relief cannot be granted by way of interim relief. Whether such relief can be granted finally is a matter to be considered by the learned trial Court by going into the merits of the case, but the learned trial Court was justified in holding that no such relief can be granted by way of interim directions. 4. Therefore, I find no merit in the petition, which is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. (Deepak Gupta) Judge October 11, 2011 (rajni)