IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 355 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 355 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 355 OF 2008 Smt. Vimalaben Babulal Mehta ] .. Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra ] .. Respondent Mr. V.M. Thorat for the petitioner. Ms. Geeta Shastri, AGP, for the respondent. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATED: 18TH JUNE, 2008 P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The orders under section 8(4) of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 have been passed in 1981 and thereafter declaration under section 10(3) has also been effected on 10th November, 2005 and the possession has been taken on 17th November, 2005. Under these circumstances, a belated application under section 34 has been made for revision. Basically, the Revision Application can be entertained within a reasonable period and not at an abnormal period as in the present case. : 2 : 3. On taking possession of the land, the land vests in the Government and thereafter issues which are tried to be raised by the petitioner cannot be considered. These are belated proceedings. The delay and latches have not been properly explained. We, therefore, refrain ourselves from entertaining the Writ Petition and it is, accordingly, rejected. Sd/- Sd/- [A.A. [A.A. [A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.] KUMBHAKONI, J.] KUMBHAKONI, J.] [S.B. [S.B. [S.B. MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.]