THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S. APPA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 33622 OF 2010 O R D E R: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) This Writ Petition is directed against the order passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No. 773 of 2009, dated 28.01.2009. The 1st respondent herein filed the above O.A. seeking directions to the respondents therein to consider his case for promotion to the post of Head Master Grade II in Kurnool District by declaring the action of the respondents as illegal and arbitrary. The Tribunal while admitting the O.A., through the order dated 28.01.2009, directed the petitioners herein to permit the applicant-1st respondent to participate in the process of ensuing promotions, counselling for the post of Head Master Grade-II, but however, the promotion order need not be issued. Hence, the petitioners filed the Writ Petition. Learned Special Advocate General submits that there are several eligible School Assistants who belong to Kurnool District and consideration of the claim of the 1st respondent herein, who was allotted to Prakasam District, for promotion in Kurnool District would adversely affect the claims and conditions of service of other eligible teachers in Kurnool District. We are not inclined to express any opinion on the entitlement or otherwise of the 1st respondent for being promoted to the cadre of Head Master Grade II. The impugned order passed by the Tribunal to the effect that the promotion order need not be issued will not come in the way of the candidates if they are selected for the post of Head Master II. The only case of the petitioners is that if the claim of the 1st respondent for promotion in Kurnool District is considered, it will affect adversely the claims of other eligible teachers. We are of the opinion that the impugned order will not come in the way of the aspiring candidates for promotion. However, if any vacate stay petition is filed, the Tribunal may consider and dispose of the same, if for any reasons there is a likelihood of delay in disposal of the O.A. With the aforesaid observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. ---------------------- (V. ESWARAIAH,J) ---------------------------- (K.S. APPA RAO, J) 1st November 2011 ksld