IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22311 of 2010 UMESH PRASAD …… Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ….. Opp. Party ----------- 2. 02.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Alleging false implication under Section 25(1-B)A, 26/35 of the Arms Act, it is submitted that the F.I.R. alleges recovery of a country made rifle recovered from his possession, when the seizure list says that the weapon was recovered from the wheat field of one Mahesh Prasad. Let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Hilsa (Nalanda) in connection with Hilsa P.S. case No. 93 of 2010. S.S. (Navin Sinha, J.)