IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2009 / 26TH PHALGUNA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 272 of 2009(S) ------------------------------------------- ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.34020/2008 Dated 09/12/2008 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------- SRI.P.RAMESH, S/O.SRI.PADMANABHAN, 21, SHANTHI COLONY, CHENNAI, NOW RESIDING AT NO.32, SAKTHI NAGAR, RAMAMURTHY AVENUE, PORUR, CHENNAI-600116. BY ADV. SRI.E.P.GOVINDAN RESPONDENT/IST RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------ SRI.RAJAN PAPPI, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE INTELLIGENCE INSPECTOR,SQUAD NO.VIII, COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN. THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------------------ Cont. Case (Civil) No.272 of 2009-S ---------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 17th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T The complaint in the writ petition is that Annexure- I judgment is not complied with. Annexure-II is the notice issued under Section 47 (8) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Annexure-III is another communication. It is stated that the petitioner has failed to comply with the court order as well as to prove identity and to produce documents in connection with the ownership of chassis. Hence the notice is issued. 2. I had directed the Government Pleader to get instruction as to whether the judgment is complied with in so far as there was a direction to hear the petitioner. The learned Government Pleader submits that actually the petitioner has not been heard. According to the learned Government Pleader, the petitioner sought time for production of documents. He further submits that, if the petitioner or his representative can be present on 25th March, 2009 at 11 A.M. before the respondent, the respondent will hear him and COC. No.272/2009 -2- take a decision as was directed in the judgment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that necessary arrangements will be made for the presence of the petitioner. Recording the above submission, the contempt case is closed for the present. (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE. MS