W.P.(C) No. 12378 of 2011 07.01.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. A.K. Mishra learned Addl. Govt. Adv ocate for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioner has approached this Co urt claiming for payment of differential revised scale arrear from 1.1.1996 to 30.09.2002 by d eclaring Clause-10 of the Govt. Resolution dated 20.03.2003 under Annexure-2 to be illegal arb itrary and violative of Rule-9 of the Recruitment Rules 1974. Mr. A.K. Mishra learned Addl. Govt. Advocate raised preliminary objection with regard to maintainability of the writ petition on different counts namely the petitioners claim revi sed differential arrear w.e.f. 1.1.1996 to 30.09.2002 by filing the present writ petition in t he year 2011 after lapse of eight years therefore the claim is grossly barred by limitation an d suffers from delay and latches and it is urged that if the petitioners challenge the vires o f the provisions contained in Clause-10 of the Govt. Resolution dated 20.03.2003 under Annexur e-2 as illegal arbitrary and violative of Rule-9 of the Recruitment Rules 1974 then this Court cannot adjudicate this application and the petitioner has to approach the appropriate Bench w here the vires of the provision has to be considered. In that view of the matter let this matter along with W.P.(C) No. 15302, 15303, 15304, 15306 of 2011 and W.P.(C) No. 4476, 4474, 4476, 4477, 4478, 4479, 4480 & 4481 of 2015 be plac ed before the Honble the Chief Justice for consideration. ... Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J.