:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1662 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 334 OF 1995 Smt. Shalini Ramchandra Bargaje ..Applicant Vs. Mrs. Malini alias Usha Malojirao Sali ..Respondent Mr. Prathamesh Bhaigude h/f Mr. Sugandha Deshmukh for applicant. Mr. Vinod Jadhav for respondent. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. Date : March 21, 2007. Date : March 21, 2007. Date : March 21, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard. Second Appeal No. 334 of 1995 was dismissed in default and, therefore, this application for its restoration. . The office note states that the restoration application is filed belatedly after about 76 days and it is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that when the board was published on 6/7/2006 for the week commencing from 6/7/06 to 7/7/06, the name of the applicant’s advocate was not shown. Be that as it may, the delay caused deserves :2: to be condoned subject to payment of costs. . Hence the delay of 76 days is hereby condoned on payment of costs quantified at Rs.500/- and to be remitted to the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority within one week. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)