IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11389 of 2010 CHUNNU YADAV, SON OF LATE RAM SURAT YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was implicated in the present case on account of an alleged recovery of a motorcycle but the seizure witnesses examined as PW-1 and PW-2 during trial, do not support the same. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 18.8.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri B.P. Singh, Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-III, Buxar, in Sessions Trial No. 254 of 2009 arising out of Koransarai P.S. Case No. 8 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. - 2 - (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. It has been submitted that the petitioner presently is an accused in only one other case besides the present one, which fact will be verified by the Magistrate before releasing the petitioner from jail custody. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)