IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9049 of 2011 ARUN KUMAR YADAV @ ARUN KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 21.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. Two vehicles were intercepted by the informant and other officials and 208 kg. Ganja were recovered from the aforesaid two vehicles. The petitioner was found sitting in the one vehicle and in course of investigation, it came to light that he was driving one of the aforesaid vehicles from which allegedly Ganja had been recovered. Although learned counsel for the petitioner tries to convince me that the petitioner was not aware about the contraband which had been taken by another person in the vehicle of the petitioner but I am not at all convinced with his submission. It is further contended by him that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent and he is languishing in jail custody since long. Taking into consideration the above-said facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, I do not feel it proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Madhwapur P.S. Case No. 31 of 2010 stands rejected at least, at this stage. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after nine months from the date of receipt of the order if the trial of the petitioner 2 is not concluded within the said period. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)