WP(C) 4931/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The petitioner who offered her candidature for the post of contract teacher in S ocial Science in the Mugdi Milon Higher Secondary School as per the criterion sp ecified in the Government Notification dated 10.6.2010, challenges the evaluatio n of candidature by contending that although the petitioner is a major graduate in Philosophy, she has been treated as a simple graduate in the Selection Proces s (Annexure-VI) and the additional 20 bonus marks she is entitled to under Clau se 13 of the Government Notification dated 10.6.2010 (Annexure-IV) has been deni ed to her. It is contended by Mr. D. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the peti tioner that had this 20 bonus marks been added to the total marks i.e. 243.80 sh own against the petitioner, she would have secured 263.80 marks and in that even t her grand total amongst all the candidates would have been the highest and she would have secured the appointment instead of respondent No.6 Kamal Ch. Das, wh o has now been appointed as a teacher in Social Science in Mugdi Milon Higher Se condary School. Mr. M.R. Pathak, learned departmental counsel points that that the selec tion is made by the school authorities as per the Government Notification dated 10.6.2010 and for contractual appointment of the teachers under the Scheme to S trengthen and improve the quality of secondary education in the State of Assam , the departmental educational authorities has no role in the process of selectio n. Mr. Sharma, learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that sin ce the appointments are to be made only for 11 months, the representation before the Deputy Commissioner, Nalbari filed by the petitioner against the grievances raised, may be ordered to be disposed of. Mr. H.K. Barman, learned Government Advocate appearing for the Deputy Co mmissioner, Nalbari (respondent No.2) submits that he has no objection to consid eration of the petitioner’s representation by the respondent No.2. In view of above and considering the nature of the order that is intende d to be passed, this petition is disposed of at this stage by directing that the petitioner’s representation dated 19.8.2010 pending before the Deputy Commissio ner, Nalbari be disposed of on merit within 3 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Court’s order. The petitioner is permitted to furnish a copy of the writ petition conta ining the representation dated 19.8.2010 (Annexure VIII) along with this Court’s order to enable the Deputy Commissioner, Nalbari to consider and pass order on the representation. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.