(*-^'( ^^— ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH1 WRIT PETITIONfS) N0r3<^?^ /2010. .^A ^xv<\^% ^•'•<.^^^' ^^>t" • PETITIONER: ..-<^-\^ ^:^ ^K--" ^ ^'\.^ ^"" Kaushal Kuniar Ohdar, son of Late Shankar Ram Ohdar, aged about 52 years, working as Deputy Ranger (Range Assistant) Duldula Circle, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Forest Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. , 2. Divisional Forest Officer, Jashpur Forest Division, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. ,3. Collector, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.3822 OF 2010 PETITIONER Kaushal Kumar Ohdar ^^- RESPQNDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Harish Khuntiya, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER(ORAU (Passed on this 9th day of February, 2011) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the relief sought for in this petition has already been satisfied, thus this petition has become infructuous, to which learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gowri