IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 15TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 26TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 2112 of 2010(Q) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- MURALEEDHARAN, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN UNNI, MURALEEBHAVANAM, CHARAMANGALAM, MAITHRA MARKET.P.O, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY MR.MURALEEDHARAN (PARTY-IN-PERSON) RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. SAJIKUMAR, S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, THEKKE VILLAYADATH VEEDU, KANJIKUZHI PANCHAYATH, WARD NO.13, MAYITHRA.P.O, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. NARAYANANKUTTY, S.I OF POLICE, MARARIKULAM POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 3. PRASANNAN, HC 2867, MARARIKULAM POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 4. HAIRUNNISA, DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA. 5. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALLEPPEY. 6. THE BANK MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, N.S.S.UNION BUILDING, CHERTHALA, PIN-688524, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 7. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, GOVT.OF INDIA, KERALA BRANCH, KOCHI-17. 8. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R5 & R8 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.I.V.PRAMOD R7 BY ADV.MR.M.V.S.NAMBOOTHIRY,SC, C.B.I. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/02/2010, THE COURT ON 15/02/2010 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.BHAVADASAN, J. --------------------------------------- WP(C) No.2112 of 2010-Q --------------------------------------- Dated 15th February 2010 Judgment This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief : “(a) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, commanding the 7th respondent to conduct an investigation into the mysterious roles of respondents 1 to 4 in implicating the petitioner in Crime No.255/04 of Mararikulam Police Station.” 2. The petitioner, who is an employee of the Travancore Devaswom Board, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Court, Alappuzha in Crime No.255/04 of Mararikulam Police Station and sentenced to suffer 3 years of imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-. 3. The case of the petitioner in this petition is that the above said case was a cooked up one and he was falsely implicated. The matter relates to a motor accident, which is said to have been taken place on 17.02.2003. WPC 2112/10 2 Several facts are narrated in this Petition, which are not relevant for the present purpose. 4. Suffice to say that the grievance of the petitioner is that respondents 1 to 4 foisted a false case against him and also fabricated documents for the said purpose. According to him, the crime was registered with ulterior motives. The petitioner has produced Ext.P4 wound certificate. Several allegations are made against the Police Officers and others, with regard to the offence for which he was prosecuted and found guilty. 5. If the petitioner had any grievance regarding the case against him in which he was prosecuted, he ought to have raised it at that point of time. After having been found guilty and suffered the sentence, now, it is not possible to entertain such claims made by the petitioner. So, the Writ Petition is devoid of any merit and it is accordingly dismissed. P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sta WPC 2112/10 3 WPC 2112/10 4