MC 4055/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C. UPADHYAY Heard Ms. M. Medhi, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears on behalf o f the respondents. Seen the report of the Registry. It appears that service of notice upon the respondent Nos.1 and 3 has been duly effected. On perusal of the report it further appears that neither A/D card nor unserved n otice in respect of respondent No.2 has been received as yet. Accordingly, in terms of the provision of Order V, Rule 9(5) of the CPC, service of notice upon respondent No.2 is hereby deemed to be effected. This is an application, filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, seeking con donation of delay of 8 days in filing the connected revision petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the delay has been explain ed in para 3 of the petition. On careful consideration of the grounds for delay and accepting the reasons the delay of 8 days in preferring the connected revision petition is hereby condoned . Misc. application stands disposed of.