IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2009 / 10TH ASHADHA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 173 of 2006() ---------------------------- OP.1330/2003 of FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLA .................... PETITIONER(S): APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS. -------------------------------------- 1. GEEVARGHESE GEORGE,THENGUVILAYIL VEEDU, THOTTAM MUKKU, THENGAMAM MURI, PALLICKAL VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. 2. T.DANIEL, THURUTHEL VEEDU, KURAMPALA MURI, KURAMPALA VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. 3. ANNAMMA GEORGE, THOTTAM MUKKU, THENGUVILAYIL VEEDU, THENGAMAM MURI, PALLICKAL VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.SATHISH NINAN RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS. ---------------------------------------- 1. BINDUMOL, PADIPPURA VEEDU, ANUKALICKAL KIZHAKKUM MURI, EZHAMKULAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. 2. JOSE T.G., -DO--DO. ADV. SRI.SEBASTIAN PHILIP FOR R1 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/07/2009, ALONG WITH MA NO. 214 OF 2007 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARIRANI, JJ. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mat.Appeal Nos.173 of 2006 and 214 of 2007 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of July 2009 J U D G M E N T BASANT,J These appeals are preferred by the appellants against orders passed by the Family Court. Under the impugned orders, appellants were directed to pay amounts to the respondents. When these appeals came up for hearing, it is reported that the parties have settled their disputes and both appeals can be disposed of in terms of the compromise petition filed in Mat.Appeal Nos.214/07 as I.A.No.1736 of 2009. We have perused the said compromise petition. It is duly signed by the contestants and is counter signed by their respective counsel. The learned counsel assert before court that this joint compromise petition can be accepted and the appeals can be disposed of in terms of the said joint compromise petition. 2. We are satisfied that the request of the parties can be accepted and these appeals can be allowed. Mat.Appeal Nos.173/06 & 214/07 2 3. In the result, a) Mat.Appeal Nos.173/06 and 214/07 are allowed in part. b) The impugned orders are modified and appellate decrees are passed in terms of the joint compromise petition in I.A.No.1736/2009. The joint compromise petition shall be annexed to the appellate decrees in both cases. c) The order of attachment shall stand lifted to facilitate execution of the documents in terms of the compromise petition. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARIRANI, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge Mat.Appeal Nos.173/06 & 214/07 3 Dated this the 23rd day of June 2009 O R D E R BASANT,J The learned counsel for both sides submit that the disputes have been settled and submits that if a week's time is granted, settlement can be reported. Call on 30/6/2009. Mat.Appeal Nos.173/06 & 214/07 4 R.BASANT & M.C.HARIRANI, JJ. .No. of 200 ORDER/JUDGMENT 18/06/2009