IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 4TH DECEMBER 2009 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 34428 of 2009(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- NISHA FEBIN PAUL, ARIKKAL HOUSE,MEKKADU (P.O.),KARIYAD. BY ADV. SRI.LIJU. M.P RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY,FISHERIES-REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT,MINISTER'S OFFICE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, LABOUR & EXCISE DEPARTMENT,MINISTER'S OFFICE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER,COMMERCIAL TAXES, PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING,VIKAS BHAVAN (P.O.), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-33. 4. THE EMPLOYMENT OFFICER, REGIONAL PROFESSIONAL & EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE,ERNAKULAM-16. 5. THE EMPLOYMENT OFFICER, TOWN EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE,CHALAKKUDY. 6. THE GDSSPM (POSTAL DEPARTMENT), MEKKAD (P.O.),MEKKAD,KARIYADU-683 589. ADV. SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.S.G OF INDI FOR R6 GOVT.PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 34428 OF 2009 (W) ===================== Dated this the 4th day of December, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner registered her name with the 4th respondent Employment Exchange, which was later transferred to the 5th respondent. It is stated that pursuant to a requisition made for sponsoring candidates for appointment to the post of System Supervisors on a temporary basis in the office of the 3rd respondent, candidates including the petitioner were sponsored by the 4th respondent. Even according to the learned Government Pleader, there were 150 posts and 1041 candidates were sponsored. 2. In pursuance to the above, along with others, petitioner was also issued Ext.P3 memo requiring her to appear for interview on 3/7/09. Her complaint is that she received Ext.P3 memo only on 24/7/09 and this submission of the petitioner is seen to be fully supported by Ext.P4, a communication issued by the 6th respondent to the 3rd respondent. Complaining of this, petitioner also made representations to the authorities, but however, there has not been any response. It is in these WPC 34428/09 :2 : circumstances, the writ petition has been filed praying to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner for the post of System Supervisor in pursuance to Ext.P3. 3. The case was adjourned for the learned Government Pleader to obtain instructions, and on instructions she submits that out of 150 posts, 120 have already been filled up. It is stated that it was after appointments were made that the petitioner approached the authorities complaining of having received Ext.P3 belatedly. It is also submitted that in order to fill up the remaining posts, the 3rd respondent has sent yet another requisition to the 5th respondent and that candidates have not been sponsored so far. 4. Now that appointments have already been made to 120 posts, it may not be proper for this Court to make any order which may have an impact on the appointments made. Having regard to the fact that further vacancies have also been notified to the 5th respondent for sponsoring candidates, if the 5th respondent sponsors the petitioner also, that should redress the grievance of the petitioner. This is all the more so for the reason that though sponsored on an earlier occasion, petitioner could not WPC 34428/09 :3 : appear for reasons which are not attributable to her. 5. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 5th respondent to sponsor the claim of the petitioner also as and when he sponsors candidates in response to the requisition that is already made by the 3rd respondent for filling up the post of System Supervisors. Petitioner to produce a copy of this judgment before the 5th respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp