IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (L) NO.811 OF 2007 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.225 OF 2007 Motibhai Kacharabhai Patel & Ors. ..... Appellants V/s. Seemaben @ Shamuben Shankarbhai Patel & Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.Rajiv Narulla i/b M/s.Jhangiani Narulla & Associates for the Appellant. Mr.A.M.Vernekar, for the Respondents. CORAM : SRI R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & SRI P.B.MAJMUDAR, JJ. DATED : JUNE 26, 2008. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. By consent, admit. 3. Since the proceedings sought to be initiated under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, is still pending for disposal, the parties agree that the period of six weeks specified in the impugned order should be read as 'period beyond the disposal of the proceedings under Section 11/6 of the said Act. The impugned order by consent is accordingly modified and the appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on any points sought to be raised in the matter and all the issues are kept open. Meanwhile, it is clarified by the learned Advocate for the respondent that in view of the expiry of initial period of licence, the same has already been renewed. ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.) ( R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.)