IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23145 of 2009 SOHAN RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 4.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is alleged to have taken away the Cycle of the informant. According to the learned counsel, difference was there between the parties for Panchayat election and that also has been resolved now, which is apparent from Annexure-2, the petition filed by both the parties. Even then the petitioner is apprehending his arrest. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest/surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Raghopur(Rustampur O.P)P.S.Case No.134/2004, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2)Cr.P.C. SKBOSE (Mandhata Singh)