1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 3115 OF 2009 (Kailash Bhiwaram Borkar .v. State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri V.N. Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Fulzele, AGP for respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4. Shri A.B. Patil, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 27TH JULY, 2010. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. In this writ petition, the petitioner has made the following prayers :- (i) to quash and set aside the impugned approval orders dt. 31/12/07 at Annexure VI & VII issued by the Respondent No.4, E.O. (Secondary) Z.P. Gondia; (ii) to direct the Respondent No.2, management to send the proposal of approval of the Petitioner to the Respondent No.3 and 4 within 15 days from order of this Hon'ble Court and the Respondent No.3 and 4 be further directed to grant approval to the appointment of the Petitioner as a lecturer in Junior College w.e.f. 08/07/2000 to 07/07/2003 and as an Asstt. Teacher w.e.f. 08/07/2003 onwards; (iii) to direct the Respondent No.2 management to pay all the arrears of salary w.e.f. 08/07/2000 to 31/12/08 amounting to Rs. 9,07,064/- within a period of one month from the date of order of this Hon'ble court along with interest @ 12% per annum; (iv) to direct the Respondent No.2 management to appoint the Petitioner over the post of Head Master being Senior most teacher in reserve category of S.C. As per roaster working in the society and to send his proposal as an Head Master for approval to the Respondent No.4, E.O. (Secondary) Z.P. Gondia; (v) to direct the Respondent No.2, management to pay differential amount of salary between the pay scale 2 of Head Master and Asstt. Teacher within one month from the date of order of this Hon'ble Court.” There is no dispute that the petitioner has filed appeal under Section 9 of MEPS Act before the School Tribunal challenging his termination. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner was terminated on 31.12.2008. In view thereof, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition since, in our opinion, none of the reliefs can be granted at this stage. In the circumstances, we dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in the event the appeal before the School Tribunal is allowed. All contentions of the parties are kept open. The School Tribunal shall endeavour to dispose of the petitioner's appeal as expeditiously as possible and preferably within eight months from the date of receipt of this order. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.