IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30336 of 2008 AMRESH PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 25.9.2008 Heard. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. of a case under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and inspite of being in custody since 24.6.2006, he was not put on T.I.P. Learned Judge presiding over F.T.C.-III, Jehanabad, who had heard the petition for bail and dismissed the same, appears more concerned about the frequency on which the offences are committed. Courts cannot refuse prayer for bail on mere frequency of the happening of the incidents in the society, it has always to consider the concrete fact of the case which could be present in the commission of the offence. That being not the case of the case in hand, let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing personal recognition bond of Rs.500/-(Five hundred only) without any surety to the satisfaction of Sri Syed Ahmad, Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-III, Jehanabad, in S. Tr. No.638 of 2006/188 of 2006 arising out of Parasbigha P.S. case no.41 of 2005. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )