^- v^:.^ ^y C^f^l^ In the Hon'ble Hish Court of Judicature of Chhattissarh at Bilasnur (C.G.} , W.P.NO. S?>g-Lf )2006 C?/ Petitioner ^r Moolchaad, aged 50 years, / (> .^(^..••' Son ofShri Shantram Sahu, ')*^/;'i'i?. ••..•• Asstt- Teacher, Govt. Primary School, ^^./ K^°,^ .'••"'C3.':\'° ^,.-<<^\v- cyT ^" ^..-••'' A<P' i?ResBondents /^' Tahsil & District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS -1. The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department Mmistty, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ,/"-.- ^ 1° o^> ^' District Education OfKcer, Durg. ^t u' »>• 3. Block Education Officer,^' District Diu-g (C.G.) C^Writ Petition Under Articles 226/227 of The Constitution Of India for the issuance of WRIT in the natiire ofMANDAMUS certiorari, Prohibition and for other suitable writ or writs, order or ordersi direction or directions. The petitioner most respectfully fumishes the particulaTS offhe writ petifion as under: - r HI6H COURT OF CHHATTTS6ARH AT BILASPUR W^ P.(s)No. 5084 of 2006 Petitioner AAoolchand Versus •s The State Government of Chhattisgarh &others Singte Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocnte for the Petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. ©ovt.Advocate for the respondents/State. OR&ER ^^ (18th September, 2006) 1. Learned counset cppearing for the petitioner submits that white wor-king as Assistant Teacher, the petitioner has gone on training to improve his qudifications on his own expenses and acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificate in the year 1992 from the Board of Higher Secondary Education, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal. 2. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two adyonce increments in view of the decision of •riiis Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporntion, Durg and another {2006 Q3) MPJR-CS 96}. TTiis Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharoduvaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and anol+ier (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B.T.I. Examination Certificate on his own expenses, are coyered by the circubr dated 24.12,98 (Annexure P/2) issued by the State SoverniTient of Madhya Pradesh 3, Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the facts and question of hw involved 'm the present case are squarely covered by decision of this Court .in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharsdwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, Durg ond another (Supra), to which learned counse! appearing for the respondents fairiy concedes and agrees with the averment made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 4. Accordingty, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yoishwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supro), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificate on his own expenses or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. AgnSiotn Jud&e Thakur