IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10993 of 2011 1. RAVINDRA NATH PANDEY S/O LATE DUDHNATH PANDEY. 2. SATYA NARAYAN SINGH S/O MUKHLAL SINGH. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 420, 406 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioners being rice mill owner is that the complainant supplied 139 bags of paddy on 16.12.2008 though the part payment was made, but the balance amount of Rs. 94,912.50/- were not made but for the grievance of December, 2007 the complaint has been filed on 18.03.2010. Considering the nature of accusation and delayed lodging of the complaint, let the above named, petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Complaint Case No. 190 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Nitesh/Safik (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)