IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 775 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA ============================================================== ============================================================== BHAILALBHAI RAGHABHAI BARIA - Petitioner(s) Versus SHAILESHBHAI RAMANBHAI SHAH &7 - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : MR AR MAJMUDARfor Petitioner No(s).: 1. MR SK BUKHARI for Respondent No(s).: 1. RULE SERVED for Respondent No(s).: 2,5,7. RULE UNSERVED for Respondent No(s).: 3,4. SERVED BY AFFIX.-(R) for Respondent No(s).: 6. 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 of any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ============================================================== CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA Date : 21/06/2005 ORAL JUDGMENT When the matter was called out none remained present for the Petitioner nor any mention is made as to whether the petitioner is interested in serving the unserved respondents. The petition therefore stands dismissed for default and also for not serving the unserved respondents. Rule is discharged. Interim relief granted earlier shall stand vacated. (A.M.Kapadia,J) Jayanti*