1> o c^' ^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASP^R WRIT PBTITION N0. ~1~^^ / 2003 PBTITIONERS: ^ .^ ..^^••"" .•••'^cy'^z^99 .^s^' -• ^^ ^ eS>v ^ RESPONDENTS: 3. Saligrain Bhardwaj, S/o Shri Pyarelal Bhardwaj, aged about 58 years, R/o Gram BiUia, Distt. Bilaspw (C.G.) Shri Horilal Aiiant s/o Shri Sampat Lal Anant, aged about 54 years, r/ o PaU, Distt. Korba(C.G.] Ku, Saraswati Shrivastava, D/o Shri B.P. Shrivastava, aged about 55 years, R/o RewaDistt. Rewa(M.P.) VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh/ through Secretary, Department of Health aad FamUy Welfare, DKS Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.) C.G. State Pharmacy Coiincil, through its Registrar, Nooraai Chowk, Raja Talab, Ist Floor, Ayurvedic Hospital,^gaipur (C.G.) WRIT PBTITIONUNDER ARTICLBS 226. L. 270FTHE CONSTITUTIONQF / -H(.'-22 an^T'^i 'f^ri?F3ni¥T st)^iict) <if^a ^w T- A^ •\J -^SF ^(NH<LI, ^Tll-H4^. f^^l^y 31 ^IH<yll 5b^l<=b 3nif?T 'tR'^ ^.f>:..a.^.&../.(^,^ 200 •fN^^r' ^ff^r ^RTrw^rf^f [SB : Hon'ble Shri Maaindr^ 15.4.2011 Shri Raliul Tamaskar, (t Shri Suryaknat Mj State;/respondent No. 1 Sliri V.R.Tiwari, couns^l for respondent No.2. Heard. A Umited grievance rai^ is that the petifioners had aj^plied Ucence before the newly Chjhattisgarh and, though, application of considered and renewed, n<| application of the petitioners.1 Though, this petition w has been liled by the consideration, the nature petitioners through this petl1 served iF a direction is issuec cases of tiie petitioners an applications. Accordingly, responden is directed to take decision <=hl^id^'1 'Hm^ff'? ft^ iPsi^K '^3TP<R3?n^T Mohan Shrivastava, J.1 :ounsel for fhe petitioners. shra, Panel Lawyer for tlie ed by the petitioners m fhis petition tbr renewal of tlieir pharmacy State Pharmacy Coiincil similarly situated persons has been > orders have been passed on flie }as admitted on 7.5.2003, no retum r^spondents. However, takmg into of grievance ventilated by fhe |ion, the interest ofjustice woi.Ud be to respondent No.2 to consider fhe |d pass necessar^^ orders on their L N0.2/C.G. State Pharmacy CouncU )n petitioners' application aiid pass [^tfe-a ^ I-HC-22 ^TT^T^r 'f^wsn^T 5t)+iict»«^a Praveen n^-^ ^ocT ^(|<4id<LI. ^Ti1<i<i<o. fa<ni^y SIT^T 'q^T^ ^i^^i 'g^q^"——"••*•"••———"""""^^ 200 fcj^<^r* W^T'^nw^rftn -z appropriate orders withm a receipt of copy of this order. In case grievance is noi petitipners to take recourse available to tliem under the 1< With the aforesaid o1 disposed of. c»iNl<rt€i1i^i*i<yiT'? f^<^l <F3i^i< ^3^TpcR3?IT^T t)eriod of 3 months trom the date of [ redressed, it would be open for fhe to appropriate remedy as may be ILW. ^servations, ttie petition is tinally Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [Trt^ tfe^