IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- FAO No. 1778 of 2009 Date of Decision:- 23.4.2009. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. .... Appellant. Versus Ved Parkash and others .... Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. Present:- Mr. Ravinder Arora, Advocate, for the Appellant. Hemant Gupta, J (Oral). Present appeal is directed against the award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, awarding compensation of Rs.51,000 on account of permanent and temporary disability, pain, agony and sufferings etc. Learned counsel for the appellant has raised an argument that in proceedings under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, compensation on account of death and permanent disability alone can be granted. Whereas, the respondent has suffered temporary disability which does not fall within the scope of Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Therefore, the award is not maintainable. The argument raised by learned counsel for the appellant is factually not tenable. The Tribunal has considered the statement of PW-6 Dr. Rajesh Rohilla, who has deposed that the claimant was having permanent disability to the extent of 10% and temporary disability to the extent of 10%. FAO No. 1778 of 2009 -2- Thus, it is evident from the statement of Dr. Rajesh Rohilla that the respondent has suffered permanent disability as well. The argument raised by learned counsel for the appellant is factually not available. Consequently, I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the award rendered by the Tribunal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. April 23, 2009 (Hemant Gupta) tripti Judge