c^ $^^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAKH AT BILASPUR W. P. {S$ /2010 Petitioners 1. .3. ^^> -^y ^^/"y' ^'^ ..-•"'' '•\.-y > /'"' ^J^ ^ 4: Versus Respondents 1. Ku. Vorsha Tikeriya now Smt. Varsha Verma, D/o Shri Sohendra Kumar, Aged about 35 years. Ku. Neelam Shrivastava now Smt. Neelam Verma D/o Shri K.K.Shrivastava, Aged about 34 years. Ku. Manju Banchor D/o Shri Jayant Banchor now Smt. Manju, Aged about 34 years. Smt. Sayatri Deshmukh D/o Shri bev Singh, Aged about 34 years. Loman Rana S/o Ishwar Lai Rana, Aged about 36 years. All petitioriers ore Shiksha Karmi Srade-I now regular teacher and posted at Higher Secondary School, Hirri, Block-&amdha, &istt.Durg-(C.6.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary Education, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur- (c.e.) The Secretary, Panchayat D.K.S. Bhawan, Sachivalaya, Raipur-(C.6.) Distt. Education Officer, Bemetra, Distt. &urg-(C.6.) Chief Executive Officer, Bemetra, Distt. Durg-(C.6.) WRIT PETITCON UN&_ER_ARTICLES 226_O^THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT/WRITS, ORDER/ORbERS, DIREeTTQN/DIRECTIONS, ETC. HIGH COURT < CHHATNSQARH AT BILASPUR f'aT TO SiTUdt -T?TCtTLT< W.P.tS) NO. 6697/2010 c 5:1 Versas Ku. Varsha Tikeriya & Others State 'of C. G. & Qlters '••WRITPEatnQN^img@Kj»iW^^^^B%|imEE^^NSTN^ '^'Qi'RSasm^^ss:':'-%:,'.:::.^.-:^';,:; .' - / ;• Shri Sautosh Yadu, counsel fpr the petitioners. Slu-t Praveeri Das, Dy.G.A. for the State. OR^aa (22.11.2010) , Grievance of the pefitioners ia this petition is fhat initially they were apEqinted as CoatractTeacher Grade 1,11 & III and ttieregfteras Shiksha Karmi Grade I, II & III but they are not being permitted to appear for ttfe post of Head Master on flie ground fhat tKey do nof have the experience ofseveHyears as Shiksha Karmi. 2. Couasel for flie respondGnts/State sybjuits that now fhe sovemnient has taken a declsiou to permit all those Shiksha Rai'mis who have ttte experience of seven years either on fbe post of Contract Teacher oron ftie post of Shiksha Karmi and tlierefore, there remains nofhing in fhe present petition. He has shown ttie letter dated 19.11.201Q issued by fhe Director, Pubfic Instructiohs, Raipur addressed to the AdvoGate General. Copy of fhe said letter has been given to ShriYadu atso and he is satisfied wifh the saine. Couriselfor the petitioners subinits fhaf fhe examination for fhe pbst of liead masfer is schedufed for 28.11.2010 & 29.11.2010 and as tbe petitibners apprefaend fhat tti.ey iiiay not be pennitted to appear in the ssane, a direction may be issued to the e(Hnpetent authoiity to permit them to appear ip. ihfi said exainiaation. 1 4Ji;s.].u- fiimimTsr 3. State couuasel subiaits fhat the apprehensioa of fhe petitioners is premature and tfthey have duly filled ui the application fonns, the authority concerued would act pursuaat to the decisioa taken by the State Govemment vide letter dated 19.11,2010. 4. In fhe facts aad cucuinstaiices ofthecase, as nofhiag surviyes ia the petition, it is disposed of witli a direction to fhe competent aufhority to permit the petitioaers to appear ia the exatniaation to be held on 28.11.2010 S» 29.11.2010 forthe post of Head Master pursuant to the decision taken by ttie State GoverDjnent subject to the ven&cation of fhe faet tiiat the petitioners have fiUed ia tlieir fomis aad fhe same have been duly accepted by fbe authority concemed. If the grievanee of fhe petitioners stiU survives, they would be at Uberty to approach fhis Coiirt. Sd/- X Pritinker Diwakar r , jud®e /