IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2008 / 28TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 18137 of 2008(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- M.K.KESAVAN, S/O.KRISHNAN, MARAKATH HOUSE, PO.PERAKAM, VIA., CHAVAKKAD THRISSUR DISTRICT-680506 BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR 2. SHRI.T.D.JOSE, S/O.DEVASSY THEKKEKARA HOUSE, CHITTILAPPILLY, THRISSUR BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN FOR R2 GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.18137/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: PHOTOCOPY OF PROCEEDINGS NO.C8/1117/2003/TSR DATED 20.6.2007 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: PHOTOCOPY OF COMMON ORDER DATED 18.1.2008 RENDERED by the STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM IN MVARP NOS.275 AND 277 OF 2007. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 18137 OF 2008 H ==================== Dated this the 19th day of August, 2008 J U D G M E N T Ext.P1 is the timing settled in favour of the 2nd respondent which was challenged by the petitioner before the STAT by filing MVARP No.275/07. That revision, along with MVARP No.277/07, was disposed of by Ext.P2 order allowing the revision petitions and remanding the matter to the Secretary, RTA with a direction to resettle the timings of the 2nd respondent after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned. It is complaining of delay in implementing directions in Ext.P2 order, this writ petition is filed. 2. Since Ext.P2 has become final, I see no justification for the delay in implementing the same. 3. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the Secretary, RTA shall settle the timings as directed in Ext.P2 common order passed by the STAT. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp