C.W.P NO. 16218 OF 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P NO. 16218 OF 2008 DECIDED ON : 10.03.2009 Ranjit Singh Gill and another ...Petitioners versus HUDA and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT Present : Mr. Puneet Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. R. S. Madan, Advocate, for HUDA. SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL) The petitioners are aggrieved at the decisions dated 05.04.2006 and 18.10.2006 taken by the Screening Committee of HUDA, whereby their claim for allotment of a plot under the Oustees quota, has been rejected on the ground that they are seeking allotment of a two kanals plot which is impermissible under the Policy. The petitioners' grievance is that they ought to have been allotted the plot of a smaller size as permissible under the Policy. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, respondents No.1 t 3 have filed their reply-affidavit. C.W.P NO. 16218 OF 2008 -2- It appears that there is no serious dispute regarding the eligibility of the petitioners for allotment of a plot under the Oustees Policy. The respondents, however, have not considered the petitioners' claim on the plea that they have not approached the authorities after 2006. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of relief sought by the petitioners and the stand taken by the respondents, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the respondents within a period of two weeks after the receipt of certified copy of this order and on receipt thereof, the respondents shall consider the petitioner's claim for allotment of the plot under the Oustees Policy, as early as possible, but not later than three months from the date of receipt of the representation. Disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti on payment of usual charges. MARCH 10, 2009 (SURYA KANT) shalini JUDGE