IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.11964 of 2011 Sunita Kumari D/o late Rama Ram, permanent resident of C/O Baidyanath Singh Chandrabanshi, Village-Karpa,Post-Chandaut Dogra,P.S.-Amba, District-Aurangabad, at present residing at C/O Smt.Kiran Kumari(Teacher),Sri Sanjay Kumar(in front of house of Jaso Devi),post & P.S.-Navinagar, District-Aurangabad. Versus 1.The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad. 4 The District Education Officer, Aurnagabad. 5.The Block Development Officer, Navinagar, Aurangabad. 6.The Block Education Officer, Navinagar, Aurangabad. 7. The Pramukh, Navinagar Block, Aurangabad. Respondents ……………. 2 27.07.2011 Heard Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh, learned Additional Advocate General No.7 for the official respondents. Prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the concerned respondents to implement the order dated 31.3.2011 passed by the learned District Teachers Appointment Appellate Tribunal, Aurangabad in Appeal No. 109/2011 and other analogous cases by which there is a direction to make appointment on the post of Block Teachers for second phase of teachers appointment of the year 2008 in Navinagar Block from the merit list prepared by the Selection Committee after counseling. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even though the order has been passed on 31.3.2011 but till date 2 the concerned respondents have not acted upon the same resulting in prejudice being caused to her in as much as her appointment is being held up for no valid or justifiable reason. After hearing the parties this Court directs the concerned respondents to ensure that the order dated 31.3.2011 passed by the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Tribunal, Aurangabad in Appeal No. 109/2011 is implemented and taken to its logical conclusion forthwith and in any case within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order upon the concerned respondent. This Court would like to briefly indicate the reason for passing this said order, which is as it appears from the pleadings, that the said order has not been challenged by any one and has thus attained finality. Further this Court would like to clarify that the said order would be implemented unless there is some legal lacuna and bonafide hindrance for implementing the same. But this would not mean that the authority concerned would sit as an appellate authority on the said order and try to go into its merit. With the above directions, the writ petition stands allowed. Sudha ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)