IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 24TH JULY 2008 / 2ND SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 22373 of 2008(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ VASANTHAKUMARI.K, KOLENCHERY HOUSE, VENGANELLORE.P.O, CHELAKKARA, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER SRI.FIROZ K.ROBIN SRI.JOSE. V.V. SRI.ROY JOSEPH SMT.M.S.SOUJATH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT (RD) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY, CHELAKKARA GRAMA PANCAHYATH, CHELAKKARA, THRISSUR. 3. MANIKANDAN.C, CHERALANGHAT HOUSE, VENGANELLOORE.P.O, THRISSUR. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) 22373 of 2008 -------------------------------------------------------- Dated: JULY 24, 2008 JUDGMENT In this writ petition, the complaint of the petitioner appears to be that the 3rd respondent is making a construction, trespassing into a portion of the petitioner's property. 2. Though the petitioner has raised several contentions, I do not think it necessary that this Court should entertain such a challenge in a proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Be that as it may, it is seen that the petitioner has already approached the 2nd respondent Panchayat by filing Exts.P1 and P3 representations. 3. If, as stated by the petitioner, Exts.P1 and P3 representations have been received, it is for the 2nd respondent to take up and pass orders on them, with notice to the 3rd respondent also. This shall be done as WP(C) 22373/08 2 expeditiously as possible, and at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 4. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE mt/-