CS No.3 of 2006. 29.04.2009 Present: Mr.K.D. Sood, Advocate for the plaintiff. Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for defendants No.1 and 5. Mr.Sanjeev Sood, Advocate, for defendant No.4. OMP No. 18 of 2006. Infructuous, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties separately placed on the record of the case. OMP No.19 of 2006. Infructuous, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties separately placed on the record of the case. OMP No.28 of 2006. Infructuous, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties separately placed on the record of the case. OMP No.357 of 2006. Infructuous, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties accepting by both Shri C.K. Baljee and Ms.Manju N.Shah as legal representatives of deceased Shri C.Baljee. OMP No.117 of 2007. Infructuous, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties separately placed on the record of the case. OMP No.126 of 2007. Infructuous, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties separately placed on the record of the case. OMP No.157 of 2009. This application has been filed jointly by both the plaintiff and the defendants in this suit under the provisons of Order 23 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying that the suit be decreed in terms of the compromise as arrived at CS No.3 of 2006. (2) between them and as detailed in with the application and exhibited as Ex.C-1 which has been signed by the plaintiff, Shri C.K. Baljee for and on his behalf and on behalf of defendant No.4, Mrs.Manju N.Shah. The defendant Smt.Renu Baljee has signed this compromise on her behalf and as attorney of her daughters defendants No.2 and 3. The powers of attorney of Mrs.Manju N.Shah, Ex.C-2, Mrs.Sunita Lamba and Mrs.Namita Gandhi Ex.C-3 have also been placed on the record of the case authorizing Shri C.K. Baljee and Mrs.Renu Baljee to represent them in the suit. Statements of Shri Hari Krishan Sharma, the attorney of the plaintiff Shri C.K. Baljee, and Mrs.Renu Baljee have been recorded separately. Let a decree in terms of Ex.C-1 be passed. Parties have undertaken to be bound by the decree so passed. This application is disposed of. CS No.19 of 2006. The suit has been compromised between the parties in terms of Ex.C-1. Let a decree in terms of the compromise Ex.C-1 be passed. The parties to this suit have accepted the compromise Ex.C-1 and have undertaken to be bound by its terms and the decree so passed. Court fee be refunded to the plaintiff in accordance with law. This Suit is disposed of. All interim orders are vacated. April 29, 2009 (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.