SinfiS® '^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUgE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P.No^_Gj ^ OF 2011 PETITIONER COMPLAINANT ^••--^h'k:^ ».risdNSh(i.'^"^" ^w "Y^^.....^ RESPONDENTS Krishnakant Mishra, S/o. Shri Ramji Mishra, aged about 30 years, R/o. Badroudi, Police Station Maewahi, District BUaspur (C.G.) : 1) State of Chhattisgarh through District Magistrate, Bilaspur ACCUSED APPLICANTS :2) Station House Officer Police Station Marwahi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) (NON-APPLICANTS 1 AND 2) :3) Gendlal, S/o. Raindas @ Ramlal, aged about 45 years, :4) Bhimsen S/o. Ramdas aged about 60 years, :5) Pappu S/o. BhLmsen :6) Shanker S/o. Bhimsen All R/o. Badroudi, Police Station Marwahi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) \^- PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Jfciito. •^sr ^!^i<rit), 'g^riTpTe, t^diyLj,< . (5-.m,?..(v-.6<:TL</-W( aii^^'^ttspit^ wian^iWtiNi Tumane L. 31^1 •TO«?i'(Tjcl^^'i,') WdTWgfeisi^i %NwN ^FTC# ^i fs^n '??ST^I<' ^e 'sfiTi sn^y SB: Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohah Shrivastava. <1. 21-10-2011 Shri Surya Kant Mishra, cour Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, Par] Heard. This petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner assailing correctn^ss and valKlity of order dated (iat Sessions Judge, Pendra Road, The order has been assailed on the 16-06-2011 passed by the Additio( Bilaspur in Bail Petition No. 84/2011.1 ground that the order granting- bait i^ erroneous.as it has been wrongly held that the resporrients No.3 to ^ lodged against.the petitioner. It is] granted bail without due considerafl were charged of serious offences. h] specific allegation to that effect was Court below has granted bail on the the case basedon record. Accordingly, the petition is mi il for the petitjaaer. id Lawyer for the State. are falsely implicated due to report also submitted that the Court has bn of the fact that the respondents le further submits that the Court has wrongly assumed that the modesty.bfa ladywas outraged, even though ^p> not made. In view of the submission mdde above, 1 am of the view that the basisof prima facie consideration of feconceived and is dismissed. Sd/- ManindraMohanShri Judge ivastava wwt'w^fa >ii("iiri<i, iraw?ira—ys/i40—2/2011—i,50,000.