IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Civil Revision No. 41 of 2006 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary Department of Home affairs, Dehradun 2. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Dehradun 3. The Principal Secretary Department of Revenue State of Uttaranchal Dehradun … Revisionist Vs 1. Civil Judge (Senior Devision), Dehradun 2. Smt. Shanti Devi W/o Late Hari Singh R/o Hanuman Chowk, Dehradun 3. Ranjeet Singh S/o Sri Late Hari Singh R/o Hanuman Chowk, Dehradun … Respondents Sri R.C. Arya, learned counsel for the State Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. This revision has been preferred by the State under Section 115 of C.P.C. against the judgment and order dted 28.11.2005 passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun in Civil Suit No. 514 of 2004 whereby the application No. 45C para No. moved by third party under order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. for their impleadment in the suit has been allowed. 2. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the impugned judgment and order passed by the court below. 3. The finding recorded by the court below in allowing the application 45C which was filed for impleadment of Smt. Shanti Devi and Ranjeet Singh as party in the suit is absolutely justified as the trial court has recorded the categorical finding that the earlier suit which was filed by the applicants for eviction was decreed and whatever the decree would be passed in present suit will certainly affect the right of the applicants therefore, they are necessary parties to be impleaded as a party in the suit. 5. I do not find any illegality, impropriety in the impugned order passed by the court below. The revision lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. 6. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed in-limine. 7. However, the trial court is directed to dispose of the suit without any unreasonable delay. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) 30.10.2006 ASWAL