IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 22033 of 1998 Between: Mr. R.R. Naidu S/o T.D.E. Naidu R/o Mumbai ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chairman, ONGC, Jeevan Bharathi Towers-II 124, Cannaught Circus, New Delhi-01 2 Group General Manager (C) ONGC Krishna-Godavari Project, Rajahmundry 3 The Member Personnel, ONGC, Jeevan Bharathi Towers-II 124, Cannaught Circus, New Delhi-110001 .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or order more especially one in the nature of writ of certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings No.29/168/62/Est./Tech/DBG dt: 15-12-1997 (Ex-I) and to quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and consequuently declare the petitioner is entitled to all such consequential benifits, such as arrears of pay and allowances, expenditure incurred for travelling, boarding and lodging, local expenses, for defending criminal case which ended in acquittal, pecuniary loss sustained due to non-promotion, non fixation of pay, stagnancy E-211 contribution of CPF to gether with promotion increment, fixation of pay, drilling allowances, bonus, prsuant to reinstatement into service on 28-4-1993 as Executive Engineer (Drilling) as the petitioner was acquitted by the Hon'ble High Court of Gowhati dt: 20-5-1992 and consequently declare that non-following of the report of the Committee dt: 24-10-1992 and the findings of General Manager (P&A) ONGC dt: 10-9- 1993 as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and voilative of principles of natural justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.KAKARAVENKATA RAO The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMA MOHANA RAO W.P.No. 22033 OF 1998 ORDER: In spite of posting the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, none appears on behalf of the petitioner. In fact, the matter has been adjourned on 24-1-2008 and 26-2-2008 also. Since the petitioner is not prosecuting this writ petition as is evident, the writ petition stands dismissed, but, however, without costs. ________________________________ Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao 24th March, 2008. KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMA MOHANA RAO W.P.No. 22033 OF 1998 24th March, 2008.