c •[ . 1^^ 1; m THB HON'BLB HaOH COX7RT OP CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPURfC.G.l Writ Petttion (S»Wo. 3>^°/2011 ^TITIONER RESPONDBNTS ^w^ .^%? ^>.---'v\'y /••^^y ^y/" ^ Ouha Ra»Venna S/o Late Srawan Lal Veraia , aged about 62 years^ Occupation, retired Iteie keeper R/o Village Soram, Post DarbarMokhali, Thana Utai Tahsil Patan , District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ^ 1. State of Chhattiisgarh Through - The Secretary Depgfflment of Water Resoiirces, O.K.S. Bhawan, Rmpur (C.6.) , 2. Chief En^neer, Water Resources, Mahanadi, Oodawfflri Kachar Raipur , Distt. RMpur (C.O.) ^ 3. Sub Divisional Officer , Tandida Water resources division 4, Dmtt. Diirg (C.G^ 4. Joint Director' Departeient of lyeasure, Account & Pension , Pension Bada, Raipi.ir (C.G.) g t^ 1 Is 1 te ^ ^ HIGH COURT Oy CHHATTISGA H AT BILA8PUR SB : HON*BLB MR. JU8TICB PRITBIKBR MWAKBR PBTITIQNSR RESPONDENTa W.P.fSt.NO. 3840/3011 Quha Ram Verma versus State of Chhattisgarh & Othera Shri Ashok Patily counsel for the petitioner. Shri Praveen Das, Dy, G.A. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDBRARTICLB 286 C^TMB CONSTXTVTION OT. INDIA ORDBR (18.07.2011) This petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved on aocount of non-inclusion of the period of service as dally wage^ for the purposes of grant of benefit of gratuity and pension. At the outsety counsel for the petitioxwr submits that during tfoe pendency of thie petition, the Govemment has now issued Circular datai 2nd March 2005, by which the Govemmenf has taken decision to inciude certain period of service. He submits that the petitioner's case is covered by the new circular. Similarly, learaed counsel for the petitioner aiso submits that another circular dated 2.4,05 has been issued for grant of benefita of gratuity in respect of those cases of employeea appointed prior to 31.12.1988. In this view of the matter, respondents may consider the claim of the petitioner in the light of aforesaid two circulars dated 2^ Maroh 2005 and 2&d April 2003. Petitioner may submit fresh repreaentation along with the aforesaid frwo circular^ and copy of this petition bsfore the resp. No.2* On 8uch representation being made, within a period of one month from today? resp. No.2 shall take decision in the matter within a period of three months thereafter, With the aforesaid dlrection^ the petitlon is finally diaposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not expreesed any opiraon on merits of the case and the authority concem.ed would be at liberty to decide the same in accordance with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge