IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32522 of 2007 MOTIUR RAHMAN, SON OF ABDUL HAKIM ANSARI, RESIDENTOF MOHALLA-SHEOGANJ(DEHRI), P.O. & P.S. DEHRI, DISTRICT-ROHTAS……………………………………….PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. RAFIK AHMAD, SON OF MD. ISHAK, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LAGURAV, P.S. MAHUA, DISTRICT-VAISHALI. …………………………………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Mohan Murari, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhayay, A.P.P. For O.P. No.2. : Mr. Surajdeo Yadav, Advocate. ------------ 3. 10.11.2008. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned counsel for O.P. No.2 and the learned A.P.P. for the State. After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw this application so that he may raise all these issues at the time of framing of charge. It goes without saying that whatever submissions have been raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner happen to be his defence and such matters cannot be looked into in a proceeding under Section 482 Cr.P.C. However, if such matters are raised in the court below, the learned court below will give due consideration to the matters and pass orders in accordance with law. With the aforesaid liberty and observations, this application is dismissed as withdrawn. P.S. (Abhijit Sinha,J)