IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20586 of 2010 MITHILESH DAS . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 17/06/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The defence of the petitioner in a police case under Sections- 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act is of false implication to urge that at best what has been recovered is an empty cartridge and one live cartridge only from the house behind his back. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhubani in connection with Bisfi P.S. Case No.290 of 2009 bearing G.R. No.3109/09 subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)