IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2011 / 15TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 213 of 2011(B) ------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------- G.KUTTAPPAN, NALANTHA HOUSE, NANTHENCODE, KOWDIAR P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695003. BY ADV. SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PWD ROADS AND BRIDGES, PUBLIC OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN-695001. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, PWD ROADS AND BRIDGES, SOUTH CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.N SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No.213 of 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 5th January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is a P.W.D Contractor. He was awarded the work of "Improvements to Peyad Vilappilsala Malayam Road". It is stated that, however, due to hospitalisation he could not execute the work and he wants to be relieved of the contract. With the said prayer, he made Ext.P2 representation to the 2nd respondent. In this writ petition, petitioner seeks a direction to consider Ext.P2 representation. 2. If as stated by the petitioner such a representation made by him is pending before the 2nd respondent, it is directed that the 2nd respondent shall consider the same and pass orders thereon. This shall be done, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner and it is entirely up to the 2nd respondent to decide on the request made. W.P (C) No.213 of 2011 2 3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma W.P (C) No.213 of 2011 3