IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 511 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 30 OF 2006 IDEAL EDUCATION TRUST,REP.BY ITS TRUSTEES,CARANZALEM GOA. ... Applicant Versus MR. VISRAM S.P. NACHINOLCAR AND 7 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. P. Talaulikar holding for Mr. Siddharth Kalshawkar,Advocate for the applicant. Mr. R.G. Ramani, Advocate for respondents No. 1 To 4 & 8 & Lrs Of respondent No. 7. Ms. P. Joshi, Advocate for the respondent No.5. Coram:- R. S. MOHITE, J. Date:- 27th September, 2007 P.C. This is an application for bringing the heirs of deceased respondent No.6 on record. The L.R's are served but have not filed appearance. Mr. Ramani appearing for some of the respondents brings to my notice that in fact respondent No.6 had expired prior to the passing of the judgment and decree which is the subject matter of the appeal. Effect of this will be considered when the first appeal will be argued for admission. Hence, for the reasons which are mentioned in the application M.C. A. is allowed in terms of prayer. I am also informed by that the respondent No.7 also expired and M.C.A.601/2006 is pending pending. List M.C.A. 601/2006 on Thursday i.e.04.10.2007. R. S. MOHITE, J. SMA