Criminal Misc.-M No. 24109 of 2011 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 24109 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 12.10.2011 Baljeet ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Diwan S. Adlakha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Chahal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. …. RAJESH BINDAL, J. While issuing notice of motion on 10.08.2011, following contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner were noticed:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner and daughter of the complainant solemnised the marriage against the wishes of the family members. Her date of birth is 10.12.1992. She was major on the date when the marriage was solemnised. The wife of the petitioner is presently living in her matrimonial home. In the FIR, the date of birth of the wife of the petitioner was shown as 10.12.1993, which in fact, is 10.12.1992, as was informed by the complainant to the wife of the petitioner.” Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Fateh Singh, submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation. He further Criminal Misc.-M No. 24109 of 2011 2 submitted that the daughter of the complainant has got her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. stating that she wants to live with the petitioner, with whom she got married against wishes of her family members. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made above, interim bail granted to the petitioner on 10.08.2011, is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 12.10.2011 sharmila