¥•• /• •^•K^ i3'it IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT PETITIONERS: BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.^o^/ 2011 1. Shiv Kumar, S/o Su^h^Eam Aged about 28 years, R/o posted at ,; Prathmik Shala- Bagdoli, Nagar Panchayat Sitapur, Tah. - Sitapur, /Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) 2. Sanjay Kumar Gupta, S/o Late Devkisun Gupta, R/o Posted at Prathmik Shala - Bamlaya, Sitapur , Distt-Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ,.•'•- A L.J^A '^s^y ,,->^<9S j7^,^r/ ^M^y / 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chattisgarh 2. The Co.llector, Sarguja Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) ^ 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat- Sarguja, Distt. Sarguja Chhattisgarh. ^' 4. ChiefExecutive Officer Janpad Panchayat Sitapur, Distt. Sarguja, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THjBPETITIONER As mentioned above in the cause title 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS As mentioned above in the cause title v HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.2077 OF 2011 PETITIONERS Shiv Kumar & Another RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticles 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Shashank Thakur, counsel for the petitioners. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyerforthe State. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on this 20th day ofApril, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were duly appointed on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-111 by the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Sitapur, byorders dated 21-12-2007 & 30-11-2007 (Annexure P/1). Thereafter, the petitioners continued on tne post. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners have not been paid salary for the work performed by them. 2. Be that as it may, without going into the merit of the case asto whether the petitioners continued on the post, the Collector, Sarguja, is directed to look into the matter and ensure that if the petitioners were on employment and the work was taken by the authorities, they must be paid salary for the work performed by them. Needful may be done within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge