$-6-9 *< IN THE HIGH COURT + w.P.(c) 7757l2OO8 uol & oRs. Through: VCTSUS S.K.SINGHAL & ANR. Through: w.P.(c) 9066/2009 uol & oRs. Through: versus SHRI DEOKI NANDAN Through: w.P.(c) 108s9/2009 uol & oRs. Through: versus HARIOM SHARMA Through: w.P.(c) L284412009 UNION OF INDIA AND Through: VCTSUS S K TRIVEDI OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Petitioners Mr.R.V.SInha, Mr.R.N.Singh and Mr.A.S.Si ngh, Advocates M r.s. K.G upta, o;":::Po.ndents M r. R.V.si nha, r', ;. *l,iltllifr T^o Mr.A.S.Si ngh, Advocates ..... ResPondent Mr.S.K.GuPta, Advocate, ..... Petitioners Mr.R.V.S|nha, Mr'R.N'Singh and M r.A.S.Singh, Advocates ..... ResPondent Mr,J.P.Sharma, Advocate. ..... ResPondent page I of 3 ORS Mr.S.M.Arif, Advocate' Through: None. W.P.(C) 7757/08, 9066/09, 10859/09 and 12844/09 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified @ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOOL CHAND GARG ORDER o/o 15.09.2010 1. After some arguments learned counsels for the petitioners concede that due to the deficiency in the pleadings before the Tribunal by way of response to the original Application filed by the respondents the case sought to be projected in the writ petition before us has not been projected before the Tribunal' 2. Counsels state that under the circumstances, leave be granted to the petitioners to withdraw the writ petitions with right reserved to file an appropriate application seeking review before the Tribunal' 3. LibertY granted as Prayed for. 4. Needless to state, while seeking review there would obviously be a delay and for which we find that the petitioners are entitled to file applications seeking delay to be condoned. 5. while considering the applications seeking delay to be condoned in seeking review, the Tribunal would be conscious of the fact that the above captioned writ petitions have remained pending in this Court as under:- (i) wP(c) No.7757 t2008 has remained pending since 3.11.2008. (ii) wP(c) No.9066 l2OO9 has remained pending since 18.5.2009. (iii) WP(C) No.1085 912009 has remained pending since 11.08.2009. W.P.(C) 7757/08, 9066/09, 10859/09 and 12844/09 page 2 of3 J (iv) wP(C) No.1284 4l2OOg has remained pending since 30,10.2009. 6. All of them have been withdrawn today. The Tribunal will take cognizance of the fact that till today it remained undetected that the contention sought to be urged in the writ petitions were not placed for consideration before the Tribunal' 7. Noting that the directions issued by the Tribunal for reinstatement have been stayed by this court, we extend the staygrantedforanotherperiodof45daysfromtoday. 8. We have extended the stay to enable the petitioners to file application seeking review before the Tribunal' Needless to state, it would be for the petitioners to seek further stay from the Tribunal pending disposal of the Review Application' 9. No costs. 10. DASTI. 1498 775 .6614/09 i WP l 6 CM No. 9in 9/09 an CM tto.f:O+OIO+ in WP(C) fZg++lOg Dismissed as infructuous. - t - rr:-l-Qsf (( PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. SEPTEMBER 15, 201-0 dk GARG, J. W.P.(C) 7757/08, 9066/09, 10859/09 and 12844/09 page 3 of 3