IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.17930 -M of 2008 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 1, 2011 SUBHASH JAIN & ORS. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Sandeep Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. DR Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 The petition on behalf of petitioner No.1 was withdrawn to enable the said petitioner; namely, Subhash Jain, to file a separate petition. 2 In regard to petitioners No.2 and 3, learned counsel for the petitioners contends that let the petition be dismissed as withdrawn to enable the said petitioners to take all the pleas taken in this petition before the trial Court, at appropriate stage of trial. 3 It has also been pleaded that Aruna Jain (petitioner No.3) is a widow and 70 years of age. She is the only lady in the house who is taking care of the children of Anu Jain (respondent No.2). Criminal Misc. No.17930 -M of 2008 (O&M) 2 4 Considering the above, the petition qua petitioners No.2 and 3 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 5 It is further directed that personal appearance of petitioner No.3-Aruna Jain before the trial Court shall remain exempt on the following conditions:- i) she shall be represented by a counsel before the trial court; ii)she shall not dispute her identity as accused; iii)she shall have no objection if the evidence is recorded in her absence; iv)she shall come present before the trial court as and when required; and v)she shall comply with any other condition(s) that may be imposed by the trial court. August 1, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?