W % rit Petition (S) N0. 2.?35 of26 . Smt. Madhu Bala Singh, W/o Shli Amn Kumar Sing'h‘ aged about 50 years. working as Upper Division Clerlg Asstt. Grade 2, 1T1, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (CG). , 2. Smt. Rohini Sahu, W/o Shri Anuroop Sahu, aged about 41 years, working as Upper Division Clerk, Asstt. Grade 2, ITI, Durg, Distt. Durg (CG). . Smt. Puna Sahu, W/o Shri Kamleshwar Singh Sahu, aged about 47 years, working as Upper Division Clerk Assn. Grade '2. 1T1 Bhilaii Distt. Durg (CG). Smt. M. Sudha Pallai, W/o Shri M. Babu Pallai, aged about 45 years. working as Upper Division Clerk Asstt. Grade 2, ITI BllilaigDistt. Durg (CG). PETITIONERS ’ VERSYR RESPQNDENTS f 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Man Power and Planning Department. DKS Bhawan. Raipur (CG). 2. Director, Employmeni and training, Women Polytechnic Campus, Byran Bazar, Raipur (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) ($3: Hon‘hle Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) I’resent : Slni P.S. Koshy with Slni Vinod Deshmukh, Advocates for the petitioners. Shri Alok Bakhshi, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 18m day ofJime,‘2&08) With the consent of the panties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. l. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were initially appointed as Lower Division Clerks on the pay scale of Rs. 515-10-575-15-800/— for the period of six months on adhoc basis against the sanCtioned vacant posts, by order dated 01.02.1985, 27.01.1986 and 05.10.1984 (respondent No. 3 & 4) respectively, and ?f‘e\ posted-at diEerent I.T.ls. The services of the petitioners were continued . "T\ with amficial break 0f two 0y three days in service and worked continuously till the date of their regularization. The similarly situated employees have approached the State Administrative Tribunal (for shert 'SAT') in Origiixal Application No. 1979 of 1991 (Satish Kumai' Mandloi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and another) praying for similar relief as sought for in this petition. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this ease may also be disposed of in the same tenns and condition. 3. Shri Alok Bakhshi, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that the case of the petitioners would be considered in the light of the order of the SAT as aforestated, alter verifying the facts of the caSS. 4. In View of the foregoing and categorical statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the State, this petition is allowed in the same terms i.e., if the Committee finds them suitable for the post in all respects, they shall be regularized on the post held by them and shall also pay them salary on regular scale. They shall be entitled to salary for the dates on break in service. Their seniority shall be counted from the dates oftheir initial appointments. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri 1 ‘ Judge to Sahu