® @ Single Bench IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. S Hgog/ /2011 PETITIONER Dilip Kumar Baiga S/o Rameshwar Prasad Baiga aged about 25 years, Cast Baiga Working as Shiksha Karmi Grade — 3 Primary School Pandri V R/o village Podi Tah- Sipat Dist. Bilaspur C.G. VERSUSE f RESPONDENTS . State of Chhatishgarh through :- The Secretary Department of Panchayat & Rural Development , Mantralay, D.K.S. , Bhawan , Raipur C.G. 2. The Cast Scrutiny Committee , Pandit Ravishankar Vishvavidyalaya Parisar Raipur , Distt. Raipur C.G. . The ChiefExecutive Officer , Janpad Panchayat Marwahi , Distt. Bilaspur C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER SECTION 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / \K 'HC 78 3a WW, Emn‘sg, 1m c ( “W“W....(A2/2élyx9.s..H¥f/QFL 200 m W (WKH) r W3? WW 1i W Tm Wimma $Wm B : Hon’ble Shri Manindra M han Shrivastava 11-08-2011 Shri Amit Kumar, couns l for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Shridhar, Pan i Lawyer forthe State. The grievance of the etitioner as stated in the petition is that the respondent authorities are re uiring the petitioner to produce reievant caste certificate duly verified by the High Levei Caste Scrutiny Committee but so far enquiry before the Com ittee is not complete and the matter is still pending. He further submits hat the Committee has required the petitioner to submit various documents and whatever information and documents are in possession of the petition r, have already been submitted. He further submits that for one reason r the other, the matter is still pending before the Committee without final d cision and the petitioner is apprehending that the department may take disc plinary action against him or may terminate for want of duly verified caste ce ficate. The learned State co nsel submitted that as the matter of caste scrutiny of the petitioner is p nding before the Committee, the same will be decided according to law an the petitioner be directed to furnish all the documents including those documents which are demanded by the Committee from the petitioner From the pleadings an documents which are recorded, it is apparent that the enquiry with regard t the caste status of the petitioner is pending before the State Level Caste ‘crutiny Committee and certain documents are J. S J. 3a WW, Emu—qt, W “mmwwwwp ADvw/VW? gt 200 31W m (WKH) r mam ammm mm Ufa 31m ,_ Q, WWW a: 'mne'?f sifaw v§ 31m! FM’ IIW‘ demanded from the petition r and the petitioner submits that whatever documents are available, hav been submitted. Be that as it may, th committee is required to decide the matter ‘within a reasonable time. T e petitioner shall place before the Committee all the information and doc ments which are in his possession within a period *of month from today. The department shall not take any coercive steps against the petitioner n account of non-submission of verified caste scrutiny certificate for further eriod of six months. With the aforesaid directions, the petition is nnaliy disposed off. Deapli Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge