nl/ u H HGwFOURT 03 MA‘?RA‘DESH7AT JABALPUR ’g y”; w m TE IG ? I5HYA h: J: I /‘ I”IHIIIIIIIHHHHHHHIHIM M. P.NO.mE, 199i4, <23 7“ 1 Kw PETETIONERS : 1. Chheai L/al1‘S/o Madho PraSaé Gupta aged S3 ye“ars,,occupation cultivation, *r/o Bangiyaparg Sarangarh distric‘t Raigarh (M.{P.)” f 2. Ram Eas Sultania S/o Ram Narayan , K‘ Sultania, occupatién business, r/o‘ .: J1 Hatri Bazar (hawk, Sarangarh district Raigarh (M.P.) ‘4 3. Madhavprasad Kesarwani S/o Vishamber 1 Kesarwani, occupation cultivation r/o ‘ Gandhi Marg Ward No. 5, Sarangarh district Raigarh (M.P.)‘ Ve rsus RESPONDENTS 1. State of Madhya Pradesh through the i} Secretary meal Self Government y w: Vallabh Bhawanr BHOPAL (M2P.) 2. The Municipal Council Sarangarh {“3 through its Chief Municipal Officer, . \ tahSil Sarangarh district Raigarh (MP) 3. The Qaxmnx Director Nagar Prashasak (M P.) BHOPAL. x v w». i «i v PETI'HON UNDER ARIICEEér‘' 225/227 oF THE CONSTITUTIQN oF INDIA FOR A WRIT m THE»~NATUWRE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARI ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE FURTHER DIRECTIONSy HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1 133 OF 1994 PETITIONERS Chhedi Lal & Others Versus RESPONDENTS State of Madhya Pradesh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon‘ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J, Present :— None for the petitioners. Shri Arun Sao. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 27th day of July, 201 1) 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor is any representation made on behah‘ of the petitioners. The petitioners may not be interested in pursuing the matter In view of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution, Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioners fo rthwith. "a: * ‘Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sl “i