1 WP 9075.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 9075 OF 2011 (Dayanand Shikshan Sanstha Chincholi Limbaji through the President VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. V.V. Bhavthankar, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. K.G. Patil, A.G.P. for the respondent-State ... CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 01.12.2011 P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. We do not understand as to what prejudice is being caused to the management by the impugned order, so as to invoke the extra- ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The post on which the respondent no.3 is appointed is a post recognized for grant-in-aid and as such, the salary would be paid by respondent no.2 and not by the petitioner. 2 WP 9075.2011 3. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain the Petition. Rejected. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]