1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.597 OF 2009 (Shri Baburao s/o Marotrao Kukde and another vs. District Election Officer and others) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 11, 2009 Heard Shri Tidke, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and Shri Madkholkar, learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 4. Shri Tidke, learned Counsel for the petitioners, states that respondent nos. 3 and 4 have incurred disqualification and, therefore, could not have been part of the composition of the Market Committee, which is constituted pursuant to election of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee. It is submitted that the petitioners want to invoke remedy provided under Rule 41(3) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1967 in this regard. 2 In the circumstances, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. It is always open for the parties to invoke such remedies, which are provided and permissible in law. JUDGE JUDGE khj