THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO Second Appeal No.428 of 1996 JUDGMENT: This second appeal is at the instance of defendant No.1 in the suit. As could be seen from the cause title, this Court as long back as on 27.09.2000 itself dismissed the second appeal for default as against respondent Nos.2 and 3, who are plaintiff Nos.2 and 3. In view of the fact that the suit is one for declaration and injunction and since the second appeal was dismissed against the deceased plaintiffs, namely, respondent Nos.2 and 3, there cannot be any fresh decree contra to their interests. Further, it is borne out from the record that the first respondent also died and in spite of granting sufficient time, no steps have been taken so far to bring on record his legal representatives. Hence, the second appeal stands dismissed as against the first respondent also. No costs. _____________________ B.PRAKASH RAO, J Dt.05.08.2010 VGB