IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1372 of 2009 Sunar Paswan, son of Late Dhanai Paswan, resident of village- Rahuwa, P.S.-Bihra, District- Saharsa. ….Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Fudan Mistri, son of Musharu Mistri, resident of village- Rahuwa, P.S.-Bihra, District- Saharsa. ……Opposite Party ----------- 2. 21.09.2011 The informant-petitioner has preferred this revision application against the judgment and order dated 30.06.2009 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge- cum-Special Judge, Saharsa in G.R. No.810/02 arising out of Bihra P.S. Case No.59/02 by which the accused opposite party no.2 has been acquitted. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 2.10.2002 at about 2.00 P.M., informant-petitioner reached at Bhagwati Ashthan, Rahua with his wife Rambati Paswan Ward Member for participating in a general meeting convened by Mukhiya. Mukhiya of Murli Basantpur Panchayat Fudan Mistri asked Rambati Paswan to sign on a register. But, she refused and did not sign on the same. The supporters of Mukhiya started shouting and abusing, as a result of which uproarious scene was created in the general meeting and the people started fleeing away. 2 The informant also proceeded towards north and when reached near house of Jago Mahto, Fudan Mistri and his sons Binod Mistri and Chandi Mistri restrained him and all started beating him. Binod Mistri assaulted on the head of the informant with Farsa and as a result of which informant received injury and fell down. Villagers Munmum @ Jitendra Kumar, Kuldeep Pandey brought the informant to Sadar Hospital, Saharsa for treatment. The cause of incident is that they were not agreeing with the proposal of Mukhiya. It is further alleged by the informant that Mukhiya and his people beat others also as a result of which Ram Prakash Choudhary, husband of Rajo Devi Ward Member also received injury. On the basis of aforesaid written report of the informant, Bihra P.S. Case No.59/02 was lodged against three named accused persons namely, Fudan Mistri, Bino Mistri and Chandi Mistri. After investigation, charge-sheet was submitted against all the accused persons. Cognizance was taken. After trial, the accused Bino Mistri @ Binod Mistri has been convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. for one year under Section 341 of the I.P.C. and R.I. for two years under Section 324 of the I.P.C. and accused Chandi Mistri has been 3 convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. for one year under Section 341 I.P.C. and R.I. for one year under Section 323 I.P.C. The accused Fudan Mistri has been acquitted from the charges. Heard Mr. Shiv Shankar Sharma, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Ravindra Kumar, the learned counsel for the State. It appears from the impugned judgment that the learned trial court has carefully considered the evidence on record and has found that there is a long standing political enmity between the informant and the accused person. No convincing evidence has been found against the accused Fudan Mistri for conviction and he has been acquitted from the charges. I do not find any illegality and impropriety in the impugned order. In the result, this revision application is dismissed. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)