THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO C.M.S.A.No. 6 of 2003 DATE: 20-06-2011 Between: Smt.K.Jana Bai .. Appellant And Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Rep. by its Commissioner, Tankbund, Hyderabad. .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO C.M.S.A.No. 6 of 2003 JUDGMENT: The appeal is filed against the order in M.A.No. 101 of 2001 on the file of the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, whereunder, when the enhancement of tax was questioned, the learned Judge has given directions to fix the monthly rental value @ Rs.3/- per square feet instead of Rs.8/-, that was proposed by the Corporation with effect from 01.04.2001. Evidently, the premises is located in Gowliguda. Many amenities were also provided by the respondent-Municipal Corporation. There are also owners in the rental premises. There is nothing on record to show that the order of the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad is arbitrary when a reasonable direction was given for fixing the market value at Rs.3/- per square feet of the carpet area and that too from 01.04.2001. In fact, before the lower Court or before this Court nothing to be shown as to how the fixation of the rental value, as directed by the learned Chief Judge, is not tenable. Evidently, the plinth area of the building is said to be 711 square feet and earlier the tax being paid was Rs.438/-. There is no basis to consider the request of the appellant for fixing of the market value @ Rs.1/- per square feet. I do not find any infirmity in the order of the lower Court and there are no grounds to vary the market value and the appeal deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO, J 20-06-2011 MR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO C.M.S.A.No. 6 of 2003 DATE: 20-06-2011 MR