IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR 1CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION No. Q2;§> /2001 M/s. Sunbright Marketing Pvt. Ltd., a company incor— porated under the provisions of Indian Companies Act, 956, through Shri S.S. Gupta, S/o. Shri Vallabh Gupta, aged about 47 years, Authorised Attorney’of the Company, R/o. 1§9, civil Linee, Raipur (Chh.) PR ETITIONR V E R S U S State of Chhattisgarh, Through Principal Secretary Commercial Tax Department, (Excise), Govt. of Chhatigarh, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chh.) Commissioner of Excise Chhattisgarh, Reipur, (Chh.) Collector, Raipur (Chh.) M/s. Sandeep Traders c/a m xfmmz 3m - team W gamut WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226(227 OF THE CONSTI- EITUIION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF HRIT, ORDER, DIRECTIoN we \ ’ .XI~HC-‘22 , High Cou %f Chhattisgarh {K m W aéaaa % $3$& ww$a% (.2.§ circumstances narra 4 K in the petition and on perusal of th' decuments. the View that‘pe it tc be‘an forfeiture of the deposited by Respon- I am not ‘ inclined to entertai this petition. Learned counsel for petltloner submits that s;nce a large Ia t I am of ~ ner cannot be said son/party fer non of Rs.2.75 crores Xlt N004 a OF money is involved, it will be 1n the in crest of public‘that such petltion is ex Mined by the court. 1n other woros, the le d counsel for petlt loner makes a prayer that 'his petition may be treated o3 Publicxlo / erest Litigatiosm m/ the petltioner has e locustandi to approach this court in the nature of Public Interest the petitioner was Litigation, inasmucn as, a successful bidder Accordiegly, t.is’writ petition is rejected. However, if, e would arrant interference by this court in Public Inturest Litigatlon, the party A_ advised and if circumstances DLE/ GRPRI—FS/4—4/99—20.000 . c¢5' Jr >9] ]€ In this View of‘the matter, I am teat er vo:«sof the View that w apprepssgags i r s s a .~ Sm