IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32467 of 2008 BALWANT SAHNI @ BALWAN SAHNI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 27.8.2008 Heard. The allegation against the petitioner is that he fired a shot in the back of the deceased whereas the other accused fired shot in his temple. Both shots are alleged to be fired by unconventional arms, i.e., country made weapon. The contention has been framed on the description of the wound no.1 found by the doctor who did the post mortem examination and described the wound on the back as the wound of exit and that on the left side of the chest that of entry. The Court reserves its opinion on the merit of the allegation and arguments in the light of the fact that the allegation does not indicate that it was a regular rifled weapon and the projectile was a regularly manufactured bullet. It could be a fact to be tried by the court below. Going by the allegation and the injuries, it does not appear a case for granting bail. The petition is dismissed. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )