;/ /^ 1/'~J^. c. ^\od igS'Q;^&-iL u^'i^-^^?ii t IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREAT BILASPUR WRITPETITION N0. ^4-3 72006 PETITIONER: Vs RESPONDENTS: ^^y/ /37T^$yy -><.-/-l^-'L..-'" ^ ./^^ .<•>. \,1' ^ A.K. Dubey, Son of Late Shri S.R. Dubey, aged 52 years, resident of Bodhghat Colony, Jagdalpur (C.G.j. i^l. State of Chhattisgarh Through; the Secretary, Department of Panchayat 8s Rural Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. 4S?^ •?'^' ^.^^- /.' f r:z t'<> l \.: 1A ^n V--'<•..'•••. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Jagdalpur. 3. The Director, Department of School Education, Raipur. ~-<. WRIT PETITION UNDER^ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC.OR _ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. BS: KB M"s" RI R.''': -F XI-HC-22 'TEEI ^|t<<lc1*l, dTfly'lto, ^TII'M'^ 3D^i ^n R'li.1* 3D^I ^RN'TTffPT h- ty wqcfr <fiiirai _^^ 7/<.€ 'M lt>- ISR^ET' afi^i ^(giw^ft^ 2-Z. Shri B.P. Sharma, counsel for tfl Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. G.A, .for Heard. yy tne [nstant petrtion, tne petil thesewices ofthe Supervisors inciudir|gthepetitionersurpiusandabsorption of •their services with the Depanment of F]anchayat & Sociai Weifare as Teacher in the Department of Schooi Education. Counsel for the petitioner sut|mits that in similar^case.beanng 'vV.P, No.3929/03 invoiving the same questic|n orders have been passed by this Court to make a'deiaiied representation rais| ten aays ana on sucn representation t\ respondents snall decide the same on sany as possiDle preTeraDiy wrtnin si^ representation. it is maae clear tnat iT may avaii tne remedy availaDle under u\ representation is a'ecicjea'. he petitioner is direoted to be of posting tiii the representation is decicjed; v'v'ith the aforesaid observationsi Consequentiy, M.Vv'.F. No.419/2 uertmed copy as per rules. ^1^41 T1 'RR^f ^ 'f^St <ptt^,l< ^sTptnsn^i e petitioner. ioner has chaiienged the ora'er declaring on ^s/l u;,i:uu4. Me prays tnat similar of Learned counsei ror the State dt In wew OT tne suDmissions mat parties, witnout expressing any opjniorj of this Court, ends of justice wiii be ser)/ed ir a directian is given: to tne petitioner 'aers may De passea in tnis case'aiso. ies not dispute the above faci. 3e..Dy learnea counsel appeanng ror tne on the merits ofthe csse, in ihe opinion ng nts gnevances Derore tne oompetent authority of the Tesponaents alongwith ^ copy of the petition and this order within ]iejng fiied the competent authorit-y of tne its own merits in accordance with faw as weeKs from tne date of recsipt of the any gnevance still remains, tne petitioner e law. ~" - At this stage, iearned oounsel fcjr the petitioner submfts that the petitioner has not been relieved so far. H^ prays for interim protection tili the allowed to continue on the present piace ihis peiition stands disposed of. 006 aiso stands disposed of. Sd/- /- Fakhruddin ^ ^fe^ Judge fh