1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.486 OF 2009 1. Pemraj S/o.Hemraj Pokharna, Age-50 years, Occu-Agriculturist and Business, R/o.Kapad-Bazar, Ahmednagar, Tq. And Dist. Ahmednagar 2. Prakash S/o.Sukhlal Badera, Age-47 years, Occu-Agriculturist and Business, R/o.Dal Mandai, Ahmednagar PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra 2. Raubai W/o.Hari Hapse, Age-72 years, Occu-Nil, R/o.Khalewadi, Bhingar, Ahmednagar RESPONDENTS Smt.S.S.Jadhav, learned counsel for petitioners. Mr.B.J.Sonwane, learned APP for respondent State. Mr.V.A.Jadhav, learned counsel for respondent no.2 (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 29/01/2010 ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner followed by the submissions of learned APP, and counsel for respondent no.2. It 2 appears that rule was issued in this writ petition alongwith other writ petitions vide order dated 30/06/2009 and further investigation is stayed pending in Bhingar Camp Police Station of Ahmednagar, based on CR No.9/2009. 2. During the course of submissions across the bar, my attention is drawn towards the allegation against these petitioners in FIR that these applicants were the General Power of Attorney Holders of respondent no.2 and the respondent no.2 has no complaint against present petitioners as per the facts disclosed in the complaint. The role played by the present applicants as they have consented to the execution of the deeds which were executed by the person, who later on holding the Power of Attorney of respondent no.2. Respondent no. 2 has entered into compromise with other family members with the said Power of Attorney Holder Shaikh Matin, writ petitioner in Cri.W.P.No.355/2009, like with the other persons to whom with the said Power of Attorney Holder has entered into different transactions. Even though there is dispute about these transactions, it appears that the original landlady, the 2nd respondent has no grievance about these transactions at the earlier stage and now she has also settled this dispute with those persons which is of a civil nature. By way of separate order passed in Cri.W.P. No.355/2009, the FIR in respect of Shaikh Matin was quashed and set aside. In the premise, the FIR bearing CR No. 9/2009, registered in Bhingar Camp Police Station of Ahmednagar is quashed and set aside in respect of these petitioners. 3 3. Rule is thus made absolute by quashing the FIR in respect of these petitioners. Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/JAN 2010/cri.w.p.486-09