IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16777 of 2011 Date of decision: 26.09.2011 Ram Saran and others ....Petitioners Versus Financial Commissioner, Haryana, and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate, for the petitioners. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that petitioners have remedy to file civil suit challenging the entries made in the khasra girdawari in view of Section 45 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act. He further states that petitioners be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file civil suit with the observation that civil suit shall be decided at its own merit in accordance with law without being prejudiced from any observation, finding order decision in summary proceeding of correction of the record. Present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If civil suit is filed, same shall be decided at its own merit in accordance with law without being prejudiced from any observation,finding or decision in the summary proceeding of correction of record. (Alok Singh) Judge September 26, 2011 R.S.