^ ,rf stns»«Bencf IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER fApplicant) P.R, NS.^». tnseiitod hyShri .6.^ J^^.1 RESPONDENTS fNon-Applicantl Cr. M. P. N0. 2,^ /2011 Smt. Nausi Begum @ Nausin Begum W/o Mohd. Jahid, aged about- 26yeaf-S7-R/o Talapars^W.; Police Station- Civil Line, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS 1.... State of Chhattisgarh Through- the Station-In charge, Police Station- Civil Line, Distt.- Bilaspur(C.G.). 2 Fatima Begum W/o Suhel, aged about-55 years, R/o Talapara, Police Station- Civil Line, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.). PETITION UNDER SECTION 48yOF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1973 <ntWITth*<lt*> ~y"f "11^1Id•t^®-ffl•U11<a, fa<11-H y . <^^'['^.1^1 :y s^ 3n^n Tra^ ('^ig?^*') ^ i. an^ii ^it ft-fi* 'S^t 'Stl^ a>Wt> v •V' ^ \ Tumane TOITW^lfl?B3II^I SB: Hon'bleShri Manindra Mohan Shrlvastava. J. 15-12-2011 ShriArvind Sinha, counsel for the | ShriRakesh Jha, Deputy Govt. Heard. This petition under Section482 petitioner aggrieved by order dated 02|-i Court, whereby order dated 15-12-20101 pet'rtioner's application for interim custodyl Learned counsel for the petitioifer applied for interim custody of the artj belonging to the petitioner and were investigation, no other person has claim^d rejecting the petitioner's application igno| from the house of Fatima, who was Mothet'- On the other hand.leamed Statel still under investigation and at this process of identification is not complete by the petitioner, could not establish that petitioner. In that view of the matter, 1 am passed by the Court below. The petitior move application, afterthe investigatlon is| Accordingly, the petition is dismiss) bet'tioner. staab aitd c"''=CTH?~ ""^lSWV % sifg'^-..;-?? : ,- Advocate for the State. ^f the Cr.P.C. has been filed by the r05-2011 passed by the Revisional passed by the Magistrate rejecting |of article, has been confirmed. submits that the petitioner had |cles stating that thearticles were Istolen. It is submitted that during articles and the Court below while t'ed that the property was recovered thet'-in-law ofthe petitioner. [counsel submitted that the matter is tag^, the Court below have found that the receipts, which were submitted 1 the recovered articles belong to the nt>t inclined to interfere with the order [er, however, would be at liberty to lcomplete and charge sheet is filed. sfed. Sd/- ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge aw<fl<i^A<tii;"ii<w,; ira—FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000.