IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13318 of 2009 Between: 1 Tayaba Fatima, W/o. Mirza Rayees-UI-Hussan Afandi, R/o. Kaber Towers, Block B, Flat No.4, Malakpet, Hyderabad. 2 Razia Fatima, W/o. syed Hasan Shahid, R/o. 22-3-400, Mandi Miralam, Hyderabad. 3 Mir Dilawar Ali Khan, S/o. Late Mir Syed Ali kHan, R/o. H.No.17-3-190/a/1 Hussaini Bagh, Talabkatta, Hyderabad. 4 Hussaini Begum W/o. Syed Mohd. Hasham, R/o. H.No.22-1-143, Karli Khaber, Hyderabad. 5 Sakeena Begum W/o. Syed Iftekhar Ali Jafeery R/o. H.No.17-3-190, Hussain Bagh, Talabkatta, Hyderabad. 6 Sogra Begum W/o. Mohd. Ali Bakhari, R/o. H.No.17-3-190, Hussain Bagh, Talabkatta, Hyderabad. 7 Salma Begum, W/o. Mir Jawad Ali Khan, R/o. H.No.17-3-190, Hussain Bagh, Talabkatta, Hyderabad. 8 Kaneeze-E-Sayyada, W/o. Mir Hyder Ali Khan Razvi, R/o. H.No.17-3-190, Hussain Bagh, Talabkatta, Hyderabad. 9 Mir Ghulam Hyder Khan, S/o. Late Mir Mohd Taqi Khan, R/o. H.No.17-3-190, Hussain Bagh, Talabkatta, Hyderabad. 10 Mir Akber Ali Khan, S/o. Late Mir Mohd Taqi Khan, R/o. H.No.17-3-190, Hussain Bagh, Talabkatta, Hyderabad. 11 Kaneeq -E-Zahera W/o. Mir Mehdi Hussain Khan, R/o. H.No.17-3-190, Hussain Bagh, Talabkatta, Hyderabad. 12 No. 1 to 11 are rep by thier G.P.A.Holders (1) Sri Nomula Somashekar, S/o. Late N.Saidulu, R/o. H.No. 4*35, Gandhinagar, Parvathpur Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, R.R.District.(2) Sri Mir Dilawar Ali Khan, S/o. Late Mir Syed Ali Khan, aged 42, Oc: Busi., R/o. H.No.17-3- 190/A/1, Hussaini Bagh, Talabkatta, Hyderabad ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioenr of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Gochibowli, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Bet Basheerabad, R.R.District. 3 The Station House Officer, Uppal, at Uppal, RR.Distrtict. 4 Bekkaram Eshwar, S/o. B.Rajaiah, R/o. Peerzadiuga Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, R.R.District. 5 B.Ram Dass Goud, S/o. Late B.Laxmaiah, R/o. Parvathapuram Village, R.R.District. 6 D.Ragupathi Goud, S/o. Narsaiah, R/o. Parvathapuram Village, R.R.District. 7 Dubbaga Venkatesh Goud, S/o. Yadaiah, R/o. Parvathapuram Village, R.R.District. 8 Dubbaga Balraj Goud, S/o. D.Mallaiah, R/o Parvathapuram Village, R.R.District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.VIJAY B.PAROPAKARI Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3:AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in acting on representations, dated 26.08.2008, 11.12.2008 and 14.03.2009 of the petitioners, and the action of respondent No.3 in bringing force on the petitioners to compromise in the disputes pertaining to lands in Survey Nos.26, 27, 28, 29 and 17 of Parvathapuram Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, by summoning their General Power of Attorney holders, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. A perusal of the averments contained in the affidavit shows that disputes persist between the petitioners on the one side and respondent Nos.4 to 8 on the other. In connection with those disputes, complaints and counter complaints were given by the rival parties to respondent No.3. The petitioners questioned the inaction of the said respondent in acting on those complaints and also his attempt to force the petitioners and their General Power of Attorney holders to enter into a compromise in the civil disputes with respondent Nos.4 to 8. In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.3, it is inter alia stated that the complaints given by the petitioners were registered as Crime Nos.66 to 71 of 2009 for the offences punishable under Sections 506, 323 and 290 IPC and the complaints given by respondent No.5 were registered as Crime Nos.62 to 65 of 2009. It is further stated that the charge sheets in both the cases were filed and they were taken on file by the II Class Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad as S.T.C.Nos.36 and 37 of 2009 respectively and the same are pending. As regards his alleged inaction in taking action on the representations of the petitioners, the answering respondent stated that as the contents of the said representations disclose that the disputes were purely of civil nature, he could not take any further action. Respondent No.3 specifically denied his interference in the civil disputes and summoning the General Power of Attorney holders of the petitioners to the police station and forcing them to enter into a compromise. Having regard to the averments contained in the counter-affidavit, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail their remedy in the event respondent No.3 interferes in civil disputes in future. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.17313 of 2009 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 20th JULY, 2009. kvni