IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1. L.P.A. No. 1759 of 2010 Date of Decision : February 14, 2011 Mohan Lal ….Appellant Versus The Presiding Officer Labour Court and another …. Respondents 2. L.P.A. No. 1760 of 2010 Sudhir Kumar ….Appellant Versus The Presiding Officer Labour Court and another …. Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN Present : Mr. Deepak Sonak, Advocate for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? M.M. KUMAR, J. This order shall dispose of L.P.A. Nos.1759 of 2010 and 1760 of 2010 filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent for setting aside the order dated 8.4.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge and award dated 30.4.2008 passed by learned Labour Court while dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant-petitioner. There are categorical findings recorded by the learned Labour Court and affirmed by the learned Single Judge that the L.P.A. Nos. 1759 & 1760 of 2010 -2- petitioner-appellant was retrenched by the respondent when he was declared surplus. He was offered retrenchment compensation, which he refused to accept. Thereafter, a registered letter,alongwith the payment, was sent but the same was also received back undelivered. The findings goes to the extent that when the work became available with the respondent, letters were sent to the petitioner-appellant at his residential address calling upon him to rejoin the duty but of no avail. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant, we are of the considered view that no interference of this Court is called for in the order dated 8.4.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge. Therefore, we dismiss these appeals. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case. ( M.M. KUMAR ) JUDGE ( T.P.S. MANN ) February 14, 2011 JUDGE satish