IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9093 of 2009 Between: 1 T. Laxminarsimha Reddy S/o. Ramakrishna Reddy R/o. H.No.12-135, Bollaram Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District. 2 T. Govind Reddy S/o. Ramakrishna Reddy R/o. H.No.12-135, Bollaram Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District. 3 K. Srinivasa Reddy S/o. Raji Reddy R/o. H.No.1-167, Bollaram Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District. 4 K. Jaihind Reddy S/o. Raji Reddy R/o. H.No.1-167, Bollaram Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District. 5 K. Ashok Reddy S/o. Raghava Reddy R/o. H.No.12-157, Bollaram Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District. 6 T. Ranga Reddy S/o. T. Gunda Reddy R/o. H.No.12-173, Bollaram Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District. 7 P. Balvanth Reddy S/o. P. Laxma Reddy R/o. H.No.12-137, Bollaram Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District. 8 K. Raji Reddy S/o. Veera Reddy R/o. H.No.12-168, Bollaram Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District. 9 K. Hari Krishna Reddy S/o. Veera Reddy R/o. H.No.12-168, Bollaram Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its District Collector, Medak District at Sangareddy. 2 The Tahsildar, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent in not affecting mutation and issuing pattadar pass-book and title deed in respect of land in Sy.No.217 admeasuring Ac.8-36 Gts corresponding to old survey No.116 of Bollarum Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Medak District, as bad, illegal, opposed to law and faling to exercise the powers vested in him with a consequential direction to second respondent to issue pattadar pass-book and title deed by mutating the petitioners names in the revenue records. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.N.MANOHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: The petitioners filed applications, dated 16.05.2008 in Form 1-A prescribed under Rule 5(1)(b) of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Rules, 1989, before the Tahsildar, Jinnaram Mandal, the second respondent herein, with a request to implement their supplementary sethwars. Their grievance is that no action has been taken thereon. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. A perusal of the applications submitted by the petitioners discloses that they are incomplete and defective. Even the survey numbers are not mentioned properly and the extent was not at all mentioned. The form chosen by the petitioners does not suit the purpose. It is difficult to expect that the second respondent, to take any action on the basis of such defective applications. Even now, the petitioners can submit applications in proper form duly indicating the nature of relief. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioners to submit proper applications in terms of the relevant provisions of law. As and when such applications are made, the second respondent shall take necessary steps within two (2) months thereafter. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J 29th APRIL, 2009. kvni