^ 0/ u' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.AfONO. ll^ /2010 APPELLANT \v- ,.^. ^-"". ......^:^! >(U %w^ y^" :^y-^' RESPONDENTS 7. Lalu Ram, S/o.Jaikaran, Aged about 55 years, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o. Village Parsapara, P.S. & Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS Ganesiya, Wd/o. Late Premsay, Aged about 30 years, Occupation-Housewife. Resam, D/o. Late Premsay, Aged about 15'years. Susma, D/o. Late Premsay, Aged about 13 years. Ku. Rita, D/o. Late Premsay, Aged about 6 years. Respondent No.2 to 4 are minor through the guardian mother respondent No.l. All R/o. Village Nakhana, P.S. Ramanujnagar, District Surguja (CLAIMANTS) Raju, S/o. Udalsay, Aged about 25 years, Occupation-Driver, R/o. Village Tivragudi, P.S. Ramanujnagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). (DRIVER) Dayal Singh, S/o. Ramsay, Aged about 55 years, R/o. Village Jhanshi, P.S. & Tahsil- Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). (OWNER) Branch Manager, Through State Bank of India, Branch- Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G). s 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Smt. Laxmaniya, W/o. Pancham. Tikam Singh, S/o.Ramdhan. Premsay, S/o.Veef. Narendra Singh, S/o. Late Rohit. Vijay Singh, S/o. Late Rohit. Sanjay Singh, S/o. Late Rohit. Ravindra Singh, S/o. Late Rohit. Smt. Laxmi Devi, Wd/o.Late Rohit. Smt. Nanki Purushottam. Devi, Wd/o. 17. Respondents No. 8 to 16 all are R/o. Village Jhanshi, P.S. 85 Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). Tajuddin @ Gudda, S/o. Late Samsuddin, Aged about 30 years, R/o. Village Manpur, P.S. & Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). MISC. APPEAL U/S. 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 y\ COURT GF AT MESC._APPBA1'_(CL_K0^18S_0?_20_10 ^.1-F,PSLLANT Lalu Ram. RBSPOHDBNTS Gaiiesiya aiid otiiers. APPEAL UHDSR SECTIGN 173 GF THE MGTOR VBHICLBiB ACT. 1988 Divisioa Beach: Hoa'ble Shri I.M. Quddusi._& Hoa'ble SSi?i G. Miahafuddisx, JJ. Presesit: P^one for the appeUaiit. ORAL_QRDER fPassed on 31st day ofOctober, 20111 List 1s beiiig revised, Case called out twice. 2. No one is present to press fliis appeal. However,' Sliri Suriaraj KIiaa, leanied counsel for respoB.deiits No. 1 to 4 aiicl Sliri P.R. Pataiikai^ leaiiied cotuisel for respondent No.7 ai'e present 3. In view of the above, we liave no other option except to disiiilss tliis appeal iu flie abseuce ofaay oxie for the appeliant. 4. Tlxerefbre, the appeal Is dismissed fbr noa-proBecutioD.. Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge K^