sn^t ^B R!'!I* 'nwsn^'a^iw *t!*(Wt ((»<*»% •dv^ '^WW'ef, W^WI'c, r^v^Wy^ ^..^J.£l°i^ 3II^?ItRgi'(^etl^*^) ^raf^^-T^n^if^ i^st i^^.a ^sffitqsn^i PETITIOJIER Sun S/o. Pani Tahi Versus tant Kumar Singh, aged about 27 years, Kesari Nandan Singh, R/o. Gram ;hayat Sendur, Post Office Sendur, ^il Paul, District Surguja (CG) RESPONDENTS 1. Sjtate of Chhattisgarh, through filp »- 7. ;cretaiy, Panchayat 85 Gramin Vikas ^4ibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District ^aipur(CG) Cfhief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, ^urguja, District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) Cfhief Executive Officer, Janpad FJanchayat, Balrampur, Block ^alrampur, Tahsil Ramanujganj, District jurguja (CG) C{ollector, Surguja, District Surguja Ahattisgarh) (^ram Panchayat, Sendur, through: its |arpanch nainely Rarachandra, aged (bout 40 years, S/o. unknown, R/o tram Panchayat, Sendur, Block ialrampur, Distt. Surguja (CG) Shyamnath, Up-Sarpanch, Gram ^anchayat Sendur, Block Balrampur, listrict Surguja (CG) Singh, Secretaiy, Gram 'anchayat, Sendur, Block Balrampur, )istrict Surguja (CG) WRIT PETITI&N UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE COiNSTITUTION OF INDIA SBLHON. SHRI DHIRgNDRA MISHRA, J 21-01-2009 Shri Manoj Shri Y.S. Thakur Para4jpe, Advocate, for the petitioner. Dy. Advocate General for_the_State^ '"^flS^'^'sSSS^^s'^^s-i. /K^1 '%,. 'fss^'^ •^:f~SS^^. A-tf^- 'S^ ^w^, ynl'y'is, [qcii'tiy 3ni?ivt R;-<!+ ^SH w^T s?>*ii«^ <; i?\ 3n^r-R?r(ipi5a^) TOnWHfeian^; _2_ /-! ^Nn^'r'qitiCT' •if^%t <Faf-^R ^•rifOTsn^r This petition is Annexure P-2 dated 12 Shiksha Karmi Grade- jdirected against the transfer order of 12.2007, whereby the petitioner, who is gli and posted in Primaiy School Sendur (Kotwaridanda) Block-^alrampur, has been transferred on the same post to Janpad Executive Officer, Janp^ Learned counsel of interim order datedj Learned counsel interim order, the impij and the same has becoj lapse of time. In these 'anchayat, Odgi at the option of Chief .d Panchayat-Odgi. 'or the petitioner submits that by virtue 15-3-2007 passed by this Court, the impugned order ofAnn^xure P-2 has not been given effectto till date. For the State submits that in view of the [igned order has not been given effect to [ne redundant and raeaningless with the bircumstances, they have no objection if the petition is allowec^ with the liberty to the State to pass appropriate orders in the matter of transfer/posting of the petitioner in the event qf administrative exigency. In view of the abijive submission of learned counsel for the State, the instant pet|tion is allowed and impugned order of Annexure P-2 in relati^n to the petitioner is set aside. However, the State shall be at ^iberty .to pass appropriate order in the event of administr^tive exigency in the matter of transfer/posdng of thelpetitioner. Sd/- Dhirednra Mishra Judge