THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Contempt Case No.1911 of 2010 Dated 18th April, 2011 Between: Sri A.C.Punita and others …Petitioners And Sri K.Upender Reddy …Respondent Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Y.N.Vivekananda, AGP For the learned Advocate General Counsel for respondent: Sri Ashok Reddy Kanatala The Court made the following: ORDER: This contempt case is filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order, dated 14.12.2010, in W.P.No.22822 of 2010. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the writ petition. The petitioner filed the above noted writ petition assailing the action of the respondents in interfering with its alleged possession of property admeasuring 3000 sq.yards, bearing Municipal Nos.8-2- 272/54/A, 8-2-272/57/1, 8-2-272/57/2 and 8-2-272/57/3, Road No.3, Banajara Hills, Hyderabad. After hearing both the parties, this Court by a detailed judgment allowed the writ petition with certain findings and directions. However, until a decision as directed by this Court was taken by the respondents, the parties were directed to maintain status quo. The respondents filed the present contempt case inter alia alleging that the petitioner violated the said direction by removing the board erected by them prior to the filing of the writ petition and also removed the lock and seal of the gate. In the counter affidavit filed by the petitioner (respondent in the contempt case), the said allegations were denied. He has averred that he has neither removed the board nor the lock and seal of the gate. He has also stated that he has not tried to change the nature of the land by dumping construction material as alleged by the respondents. He further asserted that ground position as on 19.09.2010 when the interim order was passed by this Court and also on 14.12.2010 when the final orders were passed is being continued till now. He has also stated that he has no intention of violating the status quo order passed by this Court till a decision as directed by this Court is taken by the respondents. Having regard to the above averments contained in the counter affidavit, I am of the opinion that the respondents failed to make out any case of wilful violation of the order of this Court by the petitioner. The contempt case is accordingly dismissed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 18th April, 2011 VGB