1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.604 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.833 OF 2011 Vikas S. Shetty ...Appellant. v. B.M.C. ...Respondents. Mr. A.B.Shukla i/by Mr. B.B.Shukla ,advs. For the Appellant. Ms K.K.Soran, adv. For the Respondent/BMC. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : JULY 5, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the record. Appeal is preferred against the refusal of ad-interim relief pending the notice of motion against the impugned notice under Section 488 of the Municipal Corporation Act. It appears that the Municipal Corporation has not filed any reply to the said notice. The plaintiff/appellant claims to have purchased the property from a builder, therefore, in my opinion, the appeal and the application may be disposed off with the following directions: Respondent/Municipal Corporation shall file reply and/or written statement before the trial Court within four weeks and the trial Court shall thereafter hear and dispose off the notice of motion within six 2 weeks. Till then the parties shall maintain status-quo. 2 Appeal and the application stand disposed off accordingly. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)