•<S rs ? " "'••'^.; . s rsE"^?;??^ iiEE'iUi-S: BE.SSj^ G) ^^^°2- (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0, £20/2007 PETnTONER Gore LalSahu S/o Shri Sita Ram Sahu -^ •'. "~^y ^\%?p/- (ff^'^'yy-' Ageabout41 years, Lo.Div.Teacher, ''\^'"" Govt. PrimarySchool, Dongaribhata, Block - Kartala, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) <-^-" VERSUS RESPQNDENTS .-3- ^P^A ^> \Q<,y K^y ^'9> 6 State Government ofChhattisgarh Through:- Secretary, Tribal & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) District Education Officer Distt. - Korba (C.G.) Block Education Officer Block - Kartala, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) WRiT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE226 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDJA HI6H COURT <y CHHATTISSARH AT BILASPUR '. P. fS) No. 620 of 2007 Petitioner Versus Gore Lal Sahu State Sovemment of Chhatt-isgarii and ofhers SB: Hon'bfe Mr. Justice Satish K. Ayiihotri. J Mr. AJay Shriyastavts, Advocate for the petitioiwr. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the re^ondents/State. ORDER (Passsd on lstelay February, 2007) The foitowing order of the Court is passed by Satish K. t. J. 1. Leumed counse! appearin9 for the petitioner as wel! as ieamed Pone! Lawyer appearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts of the ffr-esen* case. is similar to that of in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. State Sovt. of Chhattisgar+i & o-riisrs), which was ailowed vid®order dated 7th November, 2006.. They further aibmit that the question of law mvolved is a!so 1+se same. Bablu 2. In view of the above stated aibmissions made by learned counsef for Ihe parties, the writ petition is attowed in terms of the order dsted 74h Novsmber, 2006 passed by +his Court in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge