IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.558 of 2008 RITESH KUMAR @ SACHIN KUMAR Versus MUNI DEVI ----------- 2. 18.9.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. This Court would not find any error in the impugned order granting Rs. 2000/- per month by way of monthly maintenance to the wife opposite party. It has come on record that the petitioner has agricultural property as also his father is a retired military person. In that view of the matter, this Court would find no merit in the plea of paucity of income as is being now sought to develop before this Court while assailing the impugned order. That being so, this application being wholly misconceived is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/