1 S.B.Civil Contempt Petition No.67/2006 M/s. Jain Bandhu Sneh Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. M.G. Goswami. Date : 20.7.2006 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Anjay Kothari, for the petitioner. Mr. NM Lodha, for the respondent. - - - - - After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner at length, learned counsel for the respondent/contemner, who already yesterday informed that the notice issued by respondent under Section 29 of State Financial Corporation Act may be ignored as they had no intention to act upon that notice, stated in the Court that the notice may be deemed to have been withdrawn by their oral statement in the Court. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this contempt petition. However, it is made clear that in future such eventuality should not come again. It is also relevant to mention here that learned counsel for the respondent has tendered unconditional apology on behalf of the contemner. Therefore also, there is no reason to continue these contempt proceedings. It may also be relevant to mention here that much has been said about merits and demerits of the main petition but this Court is not taking note of these contentions 2 which both learned counsel for the parties may put at the time the main petition is heard. In view of the above, this contempt petition is dismissed as not pressed. Contempt notices are discharged. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya