IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 6TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 25722 of 2011(M) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ NEEMA MERLIN RODRIGUES, D/O.DR.THOMAS XAVIER RODRIGUES, RODRIGUES HOUSE, ST.PAUL'S STREET, KURICHIRA P.O., THRISSUR. BY ADVS. SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K., SRI.LIJU. M.P. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 635, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 635. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/09/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.25722/2011 M APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL ADMISSION LETTER ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. P2: COPY OF THE EXAMINATION RESULTS OF THE 6TH SEMESTER OF THE PETITIONER. P3: COPY OF PAPER PUBLICATION (MALAYALA MANORAMA) DTD. 18/09/2011. P4: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. P5: COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED ON REMITTING NECESSARY FEES FOR THE PURPOSE. P6: COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPTS, ISSUEDON SENDING EXT.P4 AND EXT.P5. P7: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD. 22/09/2011 SENT TO THE ADMISSION OFFICER OF VELLORE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, VELLORE. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).25722/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 28th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioner applied for revaluation of the failed subject in the 6th semester B.Tech Examination vide Ext.P4 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. 4.Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs