1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.48 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3049 OF 2006 Amritlalwadi SRA Co-op.Hsg.Soc.Ltd. ..Petitioner. V/s. Shri Baijnath Ramdeo Jaiswar & Ors. ..Respondents. And Shri Ganesh Dhobhighat Seva Sangh. ..Applicants. Mr.S.A.Abhyankar for petitioner. Mr.L.J.Pandey for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms.Jyoti Chavan for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. Mr.Prashant Kulkarni in support of CHS. Mr.G.D.Utangale for S.R.A. Mr.D.A.Nalawade, G.P. & Ms.A.Calcuttawala, AGP. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : FEBRUARY 29, 2008. DATE : FEBRUARY 29, 2008. DATE : FEBRUARY 29, 2008. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. The only grievance of the Applicants is that the right and interest of the members of the Seva Sangh, which is a registered Association should not be affected in any manner. There is no difficulty in straightaway answering this grievance. 2. In the Writ Petition brought before this 2 Court, the only issue that will be answered is whether the property in question should be declared as slum area, as is the stand taken by the Petitioners in both the Writ Petitions for setting aside the Order passed by the Appellate Authority which in turn has overturned the notification declaring the subject land as a slum area. No other issue is relevant in the said two Petitions pending before this Court. Thus understood, there is no reason for impleadment of the Applicant Association in the two Petitions, while making it clear that all other contentions available to the Applicants will have to be pursued before the appropriate authority, which will be decided on its own merits. All questions in that behalf are left open. 4. Chamber Summons disposed off on the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)