IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-10108 of 2008. Date of decision: 9.12.2011. Kuldeep & others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Rakesh Bakshi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Satyavir Singh Yadav, DAG, Haryana. NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL) By filing this petition, quashing of First Information Report No.190 dated July 4th, 2000 under Sections 406, 498-A/120-B read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code Police Station City Yamuna Nagar, District Yamuna Nagar, is sought. By order dated September 24th, 2009 Jora Singh. J. directed the parties to appear before the trial Court and the trial Court was directed to record their statements. In compliance with the same, Usha Rani-respondent No.2 appeared before the trial Court and her statement was recorded by the trial Court. The trial Court has sent the report that compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that a decree of divorce under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act has already been granted in favror of the parties. Usha Rani has remarried. Having regard to the fact that all matrimonial differences have been resolved, this Court is of opinion that no useful purpose would be served by allowing the criminal proceedings to continue against the petitioner. In view of the above, the petition is accepted, FIR No. No.190 dated July 4th, 2000 under Sections 406, 498-A/120-B read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code Police Station City Yamuna Nagar, District Yamuna Nagar and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed. 9.12.2011 (NAWAB SINGH) SN JUDGE