1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.2440/2008. Samadhan Laxman Shekokar ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra and another. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, office Memoranda of Coram Court's or Judge's appearances, Court's orders or directions order and Registrar's order. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= CORAM: D.D.SINHA and C.L.PANGARKAR,JJ. DATE : 20th June, 2008. 1. Heard Mr.S.J.Kadu, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In the present writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is in respect of communication dated 9/1/2008, whereby the petitioner was informed that as per his date of birth, the petitioner shall be completing the age of 58 years on 30th June, 2008 and shall stand retired from service with effect from the said date. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the date of birth which is relied by the authority is incorrect date of birth and therefore, 2 the petitioner has requested the authority for correcting the same. In the present case, it is not in dispute that the petitioner was appointed in the year 1977 and for the first time approach the authorities for correcting the date of birth at the flag-end of his career. We have already observed in other matter that even if there is no time prescribed, it is always reasonable time within which the candidate concerned needs to apply for correcting the date of birth, otherwise this will create difficult situation if the candidates are permitted to move the authorities at any point of time during their life time. Hence, no case is made out for indulgence. The writ petition is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE. chute