:.,.)tWIMB .snKitws.we'.! -78 'dwi T«ioin<4, t»-^l'(i<i<»,Rnitiy *ll*iril fPW —•--•----••-—•—• ^200 3IT^9T CR!p (>jc|(j's|<i) 3II^?7<BTR'li4> asiTsn^sTspire gRirw;vif^s an^sT W.Pt PETITIONER R.K. B^jraag, S/o ShriSoaa Raxa Bajraug, aged about <i8 years, R/p WRD Colony Rudri, Distt. Dhamt^ri (CG) Versds RESPONDENTS 1 State Water Raipur Addl. ! Water Raipur R.S. Water Machir Distt.1 df hide 83: HON. SHKi DHIRENDRA IMISHRA, J 18-11-2008 Oovt Shri P.S. Koshy, counscl Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. 2/State. Shri B.D. Guru, counsel]for respondent No.3. Heard on adniission. Beiag ^grieved by the whereby the petitioner, who CADA Sub-division, Rudri, and posted as Assistant Eng^neer ct)|«fri41-liiinT^' fec8 •(lu]t^;i'< ^ aif^H SII^CT No.5804/2008 Chhatdsgarh, through the Secretaiy, pesoiirces Department, D.K.S. Bhawaa, |(CG) iecretary, Govenunent of Chhattisgarh, [Resources Departnient, D.K.S.Bhavyan, |(CG) ^jendra, Sub Engiaeer, Of&ce of S.D.0. pesources Departaient (E & M), Light |eiy, Nalkup & Gate Sub Division, Durg, ;(CG) •Op.rg WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICt.B 226 OF THB CONSTITUTSON OF INDIA for the petitk^ner. svt. Advocate for the respondent No. 1 & t)rder ofAnnexure P-1 dated 1.10.2008, was posted as Sub-divisional Oificer, D|istrict- Dhamtari, has been traasferred g^neer (Design) in the office of Executive '-78 ^SS^^fW^f, t»TTl'<i<i<»,Rni'ny *iiini ?ew OT^?TOTR-<i* aW 311^91shfi* 3(1^91 VRIfi (^c|(j6|<£i) W^ 200 S^ITW^felSIT^ST 2 :placi^l: camitia coliusel Enguieer, Water Resources D|i peutioner has filed the iastan) Grievance of fhe petitiit been passed in order to acco^a substaative post of Sub-En^i char^e of Sub-division rei Leamed couiisel for ttle the respondent No.3 as Sub\ 1.0i5 of the SS.P.P.W.B. division shaU be in charge ol the prescribed account exsswjfi I have heard leamed By fhe impugned orderj ofher officers offhe Water Re; Froin perusal of fhe impugne^ who is posted as Sub-divisicji has been transferred as Assi4i of Executi.ve Engineer at Rudiji !t is setfied law that Court should ordiaarily no| jurisdiction of the State ia fh{ the Coastitution of India malafide or fhat ttie semce aufhorities, who issued fhd auftiority to pass such oiders| Majttaal, -divisictnal unlebs <pi«fn41iiiinV^fls'd •<Rflt^;]'< ^aif^rsn^ST spartment, Riidri, District Dhaintad, the petition. bner is fhat above order of trausfer has i]miiodate the respondent No.3, who holds ^iaeer and who has been posted as in- i^ig tlie petitioner. petitioner subinits that the posting of >|-divisional Officer is contraiy to CIause wbich clearly provides fhat a Sub- an Assistant Engineer, who 1a.as cleared itiation. for the petitioner. apart froin fhe petitioner, as inaay as 25 (ource Departuient have been tran.sferred. P order, it is observed fhat fhe petitioner, Ofl&cer in CADA Sub-division, Rudri (taat Engineer (Design) in the sanie office tijansfer is an ex^ency of service and the )): interfere ia exercise of discretionary ifc inatters of transfer under Articlc 226 of fhe Court finds fhat either the oider is ^ules prohibit such transfer, or fhat fhe tcaasfer orders, were not coiapetent K' fratftuirrftiians^^ ^"T •^ll^llri^, lynl'd'is, Rwitiy *11*1C91 WV ^200 3II^?T (R?P (^clijcl^) an^sT'prR'd* ?raT3II^9T**li<b ?^IT8R ^lf^T 3TI^ST Thus, having regard to appears to be no ground for jiirisdiction under Article 2; <ni«[»<IliiiinT^rfsx3'(lult^lt ^aif^Tan^?! been transferred as Asstetaat fhe above setfled principle of law, fhere uiterference by this Court in exercise of ?6 of the Gonstitution of India in fhe iinpugned transfer order of ti|ie petitiouer, whereby the petitioner has Engiaeer (Designj within fhe same ofBce of Executive Engiueer on fhe ^diiuiustrative ground. Accordingly, fhe petiti^n is disinissed at fhe adinission^tage_ itself. Dhu-endraMishra Judge