THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12505 of 2006 Dated 01st July, 2010 Between: Pyboina Ravindra Kumar. …Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police, Eluru and others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri B. Somasekhar Counsel for respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Home The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “..to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in keeping constant surveillance and making domiciliary visits at nights and infringing my personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with personal liberties and pass such other order..” At the hearing, Sri B. Somasekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.15538 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 01st July, 2010 GHN