IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 24346 of 2009 Date of decision: 31.03.2010 Ajit Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. N S Kandhola, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Abhishek Chautala, AAG, Punjab for the respondent - State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Mr. Abhishek Chautala, AAG, Punjab prays for an adjournment on the ground that the Investigating Officer is not present. The same prayer was made on the last of hearing i.e. 16.02.2010. As such, no further adjournment can be granted. In any case, in the order dated 08.12.2009, it was noted that the petitioner has joined the investigation but was required for further investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the order dated 08.12.2009 has since been complied with. In view of the above, the order dated 08.10.2009 passed by this Court is made absolute. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 31.03.2010 mohan