IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21909 of 2010 PAPPU PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.6.2010 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with S.T. No. 484 of 2010 arising from Barhara P.S. Case No. 77 of 2009 for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently Sections 328 and 120B was added to the set of charges. Learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to the statement of allegation as set out in the FIR submits that the petitioner is neither named therein nor any allegation has been set out against him. Learned counsel further submits that the informant himself has mentioned that his mother-in-law informed him that Co-accused Gajju Paswan has administered ‘Rogar’ mixed water to his son Mithun Rishideo and Budhan Rishideo, stating it to be toddy. Learned counsel thus submits that in absence of any allegation against the petitioner, he has been wrongfully involved in the present proceeding merely on suspicion, the basis of a threatening said to have been given by him some time back. 2 Taking into consideration the circumstances and submissions of learned counsel, let the petitioner, namely, Pappu Paswan be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.- 6, Purnea , in connection with S.T. No.484/2010 (arising out of Barhara P.S. Case No. 77/2009), subject to the condition that the petitioner would ensure his representation in the trial on each and every date fixed and upon failure on his part to ensure his representation in the Court on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the Court below would confer liberty to the Court concerned, to initiate proceeding for cancellation of his bail bonds and for taking him into custody. Anand Kr. ( Jyoti Saran, J.)