..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.154 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.154 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.154 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATIN NO.155 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATIN NO.155 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATIN NO.155 OF 2006 WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.139 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.139 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.139 OF 2006 Subhash Fransis Desouza ...Applicant/ Appellant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. . . . Mr.B.A.Aloor and Jahagirdar, Advocate for the Applicant-Appellant. Smt.V.R.Bhosale, APP, for the State. . . . CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED : MARCH 31, 2006. DATED : MARCH 31, 2006. DATED : MARCH 31, 2006. P.C.: . This is an application for condonation of delay. There is delay of 12 days in filing the appeal. The accused is in jail. He is convicted for life imprisonment. Delay is satisfactorily explained. In the circumstances, the delay is condoned. Application is disposed of. . Heard. Appeal No.139 of 2006 is admitted. . As far as bail application is concerned, S.O. two week. (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) ..(2).. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)