;=^^''AJ^;4^^-^^^s^w^L.^ \^' •spi»asms9 aip jad sy siNstONOdsaraam.do swnaouavTZ •app asnea aip jad sy ®NOUliad3DHJ. SO SHVTfUUHVd •I VIffiS dO JsEOIXflUlSNOO ^^^BTdO LW9tt SIX.LW VS.WSa NOlUXSd -^- '<l'r:lislri i;i![t1ij ^/ ^ ; .A~'l; •1^' ..' "^ i •'•;\1-:' '• ''' i " li '•• •-. • v\ .-^,'fT ^ ''"'^!SS0?''' ^ '"^, ^LC\ •jnds8[fg '^isusAian sepiseig) tunQ 'joiiaoireqo aoy^ sqj. qSno.ny, 'AII&»AIU{I sqiisBqo .•r<9 •Ot^ •i.-6T .•i-:e^ ^.^'"'^A seapwsv) nmo g ,, (•q^!.^ ^•s.^ •0^ ' ^ •jndsBiig ...'^^y[^--/"" 'a8s{{OQ guuasuigug '{Gdraaud ^?^."-; zl"^' S aqj, qSnojiy, 'jndsBpg '(liamiusAoS .t~^^ Aq snomouopiv paraioap) a8a{{03 Suuaauigag aipjo luomaSBirej^ aqj, ^ -mdiBg 'guiBBBfj .RModne^ PIIE uopBonpg iBoioqaaj. 'AiEtWoag aVL q8noJIU. 'iIJreSstUBqijQ jo atKtg l snsaaA •jndsB(ig 'iuo^ 'sndiueo sSsno^ Suuaamgug 9-3 o/^[ 'indsBjig (iBsuiuuaAoo Xq snouioaoiny p3JB{38Q ) a8a{(03 guijasuigug 'SuuaguiSng (Boiireqoap^ m jspea^ 'sieaA ^g psSB'qgOTg qsireq.reH "qs W^ o/S 'PS •S -0 'W iSaNOUUad :siNaaNOdsaa TOOZ/ g 9T'r •ONNOULUadXiaM WldSnia JLTHHVOSIJJLVHHa dO AHI103 H9IH 3H1 N1 y i0 aJ ./-3 XI-HC-22 -a^9 •^iqi?i<<, 9Tfl'y<is, facti'yy f /a •SWOT^I 3JI^^ a^WHfgg ^ tl..S.....12&&/.2K.Ql^ TaitIT^ ~ ~"v - ' sn^i'?taiW(if??f 24.8.2001 : Mr.Utterash Vejrma for the pBtitloner. Dr.N.K.Shukla has been The impugned ojrder of transfer^issued by the Additional Secretary,Hlgher| of the Governor of theStat) counsel for the petltioner been approved by the Chief j Two main objections are tal<| the learned counsel for thel transfer is in violatj.on of All india Counc.i.l for Technl <^i^i<n4l'i- Uftcfl "4 f^T^' Tf^SR ^sifetTsn^l ^.earned Dy.AG for the State. Technical Edycation in the name a. It is sufcmitted by the bhat the order of transfer has "tinister of theState of Chhattisgarh sn. Firstly it 1s submitted by petitioner thst ths order of norms and standards set by l.cal Edudat.Lon in as much as in the present order of tratisfer student-teacher ratio has been violated. Secondly.it ]ts also contended that certain whlt{Sher has bsen ussd to ejr'ase some Words -Ln the impugned /L-r- ocder of transfer, Accordinfef to learned counsel for the 1 .^ . c^^<^-' •»use of wtil^ner has "added some suspicion in the raind o£ the petition^r as regards bonafiae of the order of transfer. It may be stat at Engi-neering College.Bila this order the petitioner Jagdalpur Engiaeerlng >d that the petitionar has served i^pur for more than 20 years. By h^s been directed to join at Learned couhsel for the Colle^e. -p®fe±fc-i®aeE—npw sta-fees—.litthfe Bar—thattho »?rit pst-Ltioner [T<^ ^fe^ »«• Sff^;^ f?;it'e'37lt?T an:iwgfei • »&«• STi^l'^IRR'ait^ 3iN?PflTW:l?ff if fe3t ^TFaR '^'31^^ <RT^I has some health problem view of the health probl< from Bilaspur to Jagdalptir ^lso. It is submitted that in ^m he should not be transferred petitioner as well as Dr| sone Isngth and on perui I aniof the view that thi of transfer issued in si author-ltY* It is npt th< he is in any way advers< regards his service con< and allowances et-c. Pet^ and in fact the transfi No malafide can be impul present ease. I an inc| After heari^ig learned counsel for the for interference t>y thit Accordin^ly.the petitio|r I.N.K.shukla.learned Dy.A.G. at |al of the prder of transf^L ^-. order impngned is a simple order rvice exigency by the comp.;<;ent aase of the wri.t petitloner that ly affeated by the transfer as ition, including the status, pay bl^! tioaer holds a transfdrabl^post r is simply an incldent of service. ed to the order of transfer in the ined to say that there is no room aourt with the order of transfer. t 1s rejected. Sd/- ChiefJustice