IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC(T) No.: 318 of 2008. Decided on: 22.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Anjali Thakur. … Petitioner. Versus P. Mitra and others. …Respondents/Contemnors. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Surender Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents/ Contemnors : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. None for respondent No.4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. Surender Thakur, Advocate appearing vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 22, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?