IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.497 OF 2004 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.1404 OF SUMMARY SUIT NO.1404 OF SUMMARY SUIT NO.1404 OF 2004 Kantilal Narsi Gala .. Plaintiff versus Bherumal P.Jain .. Defendant ... Mr.A.H.Yadav for Plaintiff. Mr. T,.Goradia for Defendant. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 23rd March 2005. DATED : 23rd March 2005. DATED : 23rd March 2005. P.C:- P.C:- P.C:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Summons is not in Form No.11 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. Even otherwise I find that the defences raised raises triable issues. Hence, the defendant is granted unconditional leave to defend the suit. Suit shall stand transferred to the list of commercial causes. Defendant to file the written statement within one month. D.G.KARNIK, J