IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 15TH MAGHA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1834 of 2008(S) ------------------------------- (Against the judgment dated 18.7.2008 in W.P(C)No. 3263/2006) PETITIONER: --------------- PHILOMINA JOSEPH, AGED 60 YEARS, W/O.LATE V.A.KURIAKOSE, VARICKAPLAKAL HOUSE, CHOTTANIKKARA (P.O), ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. RESPONDENT: --------------- SMT.JESSY JOSEPH, (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.A.J.VARGESE THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ---------------------------------------------- Cont. Case (Civil) No.1834 of 2008-S --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th February, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner alleges that the respondent wilfully and deliberately violated the directions contained in the judgment dated 18.7.2008. Hence the Contempt Case is filed. The learned Government Pleader submitted that seeking review of the judgment, the respondent had filed a review petition. The review petition was dismissed in December 2008. On account of the pendency of the review petition, there occurred delay in complying with the directions. After the dismissal of the review petition, non-liability certificate was issued to the Sub Treasury Officer, Tripunithura on 2.1.2009, in favour of the petitioner, as per letter No.D1/24164/02 dated 2.1.2009 and thus the directions in the judgment have been complied with. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not received any intimation regarding the issue of non-liability certificate. He sought for ten days' time to get instructions from the petitioner. I do not think that it is necessary to keep the Contempt Case pending. Recording the submissions made by the Government Pleader, the Contempt Case is closed. If the petitioner finds that the submission made by the Government Pleader is not correct, she would be free to file a memo in this Contempt Case to revive the same. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE Cont. Case (Civil) No.1834 of 2008-S 2 ab Cont. Case (Civil) No.1834 of 2008-S 3 Cont. Case (Civil) No.1834 of 2008-S 4 Cont. Case (Civil) No.1834 of 2008-S 5