IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1361 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1294 OF 2007. Riyaz Ahmed Sadiq Jumma ..... ...... ......Applicant. V/s Maharashtra State Electricity Board & Ors. ......Respondents. Mr.S.K.Shinde i/by Mr.Sagar V. Kasar, Adv. For the applicant. Mr.Y.M.Nakhwa, APP For the respondent. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 18/12/07 PC: Heard. The applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under section 135(1)(c) of the Electricity Act and sentenced to suffer RI for one year, pay fine of Rs.3000/- and in default to suffer RI for two months. The applicant is also convicted under section 138 of the Electricity Act to suffer RI for one year and pay fine of Rs.2000/-, in default to suffer RI for one month. The substantive sentences are to run concurrently. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that during the trial the applicant was released on bail and has not mis used the same. The sentence is of one year and the appeal is most unlikely to be heard within a period of one year. Learned counsel further states that the fine amount has been deposited in the Court below. Hence I direct that the applicant be 1 released on bail on the same terms and conditions on which he was released on bail during the trial on executing fresh bail bonds. Application stands disposed of. 18.12.07 2