IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX INCOME TAX INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1747 OF 2007 APPEAL (L) NO.1747 OF 2007 APPEAL (L) NO.1747 OF 2007 The CIT .. Appellant Vs. Shankarlal Kejriwal .. Respondent Mr.D.K.Kamwal for the Appellant. Mr.P.R.Toprani for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 25th September, 2008 DATE : 25th September, 2008 DATE : 25th September, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The learned Counsel for both the parties categorically state that the question of law raised in this Appeal is squarely covered by the Division Bench order of this Court passed in the case of CIT CIT CIT V/s.Walfort Shares and Stock Brokers Private Limited - V/s.Walfort Shares and Stock Brokers Private Limited - V/s.Walfort Shares and Stock Brokers Private Limited - ITXA 18 of 2006 dated 8.8.2008, ITXA 18 of 2006 dated 8.8.2008, ITXA 18 of 2006 dated 8.8.2008, against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee. In view thereof, the Appeal stands dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)