IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1599 of 2011 1. MD. ARIF 2. MD. MOJAHID Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 19.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 363, 366A and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner no.2 is of enticing away the daughter of the informant and subsequently, agreed to marry. It is alleged against the petitioner no.1 that he also assured for marriage, but subsequently, marriage was not finalized between the victim girl and Md. Mojahid. Though, the victim girl in 164 Cr.P.C. statement has admitted about her going in the company of the petitioner no.2 of her own, but since, the victim girl is minor, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to petitioner no.2. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail of the petitioner no.2 keeping in mind that 2 victim of her own went in the company of petitioner no.2 and her age was recorded by the informant himself as 17 years and dispose of the regular bail application of the petitioner no. 2 preferably on the same day, if the petitioner no.2 surrenders within a period of four weeks. So far as petitioner no.1 is concerned, since the thrust of accusation is against the petitioner no.2, let the above named petitioner no.1, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Gwalpara P.S. Case No. 19/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)