IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 6095 of 2011 Date of decision : 06.04.2011 Raghbir Singh ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) The main grievance emanating from the record is that although, the petitioner moved an application (Annexure P-8) for reinstatement on the post of Sarpanch, on the basis of inquiry report of A.D.C., Ludhiana, but the same has not yet been decided by the Director, Department of Rural and Development Panchayat, Punjab (respondent No.2). After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, going through the record, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2, to decide the application (Annexure P-8) of the petitioner and to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. April 06, 2011 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) naresh.k Judge