1 WP.3050-2010 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3050 OF 2010 Shivkaran Maleram Mistry ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. ----- Mr. O.P. Pandey i/b M/s Pandey & Co., for the Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, APP for the State-Respondent 1 to 5. Mr. Sandeep Dhuri i/b Mr. A.S. Chavan, for Respondent No.6. ---- CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D. SALVI, JJ. JUNE 21, 2011. P.C.: 1 Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Respondent No.6. Mr. Gadkari, the learned APP appears for the State (Respondent Nos. 1 to 5). 2 Respondent No.6 is the son of the Petitioner and therefore, this court by the earlier order dated 23.12.2010 referred the parties for mediation so as to explore the possibility of settlement. 2 WP.3050-2010 3 Mr. Pandey, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner now informs us that the mediation proceedings could not bring about any settlement, and mainly because Respondent No.6 did not participate. The record shows that as per the order dated 26.10.2010, the Petition stands dismissed against Respondent No.6. 5 Mr. Gadkari, the learned APP, on instructions, states that if the Petitioner approaches the Andheri Police Station tomorrow i.e. on 22.6.2011 between 3.00 p.m. and 5.00 p.m., his statement will be recorded by the Police Station and it will be acted upon as required under the Code of Criminal Procedure. 6 The Petition is disposed off accordingly. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)