HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HON'BLE SKR! SUNSL KUMAR SSNHA, J. Appellants Petltloners Writ Appeal No.408 of 2010 1 Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Karamchari Sangh, A Trade Union registered under the provisions of the Trade Union Act, 1926, having its registration of Trade Unlon, ChhaStisgarh, Raipur, Through its State President Tansen Chandrawanshi, S/o Late Chobees Ram Chandrawanshi, aged 5Z years, R/o H.No.711, Nagar Nigam 'Colony, Maharana Pratap Chowk, Bilaspur (CG) 2 Naresh Kumar Shrivastava, S/o Mahesh Prasad Shrivastava, aged about 37 years, R/o Mishra Building, Kailash Nagar, Dantewada, Chhattisaarh Chhattisgarh State Corporation Civil Suppiies having its registered office at Bal Ashram Parisar, Kachhari Chowk, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, through its Managing Director Writ Aooeal under Section 2 (1) of the Chhattisaarh Hiflh Coyrt (Appeal to Division Bench) Act. 2006 Present : Dr NK Shukla, senior counsei with Ms A Sen Gupta, counsel for the appeliants. Shri NKVyas, counsel forthe respondent. (14th Dscembsr, 2S1S) ""fSf3ysv~, -? -^^ 2 ^t^ The foilowing judgment of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. As the so!e respondent in this appeai now is represented, the default pointed out by the Registry does not survive. 2) Learned counsel for the parties are heard on iA No.1/2010, an apptication for condonationof the delay in filing the writ appeai. 3) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the grounds taken in the application, we are satisfied that the appeilants have succeeded in showing sufficient cause for the delay in filing the writ appeai. , 4) IA No. 1/2010, therefore, is aliowed and the delay of three days in fiiing the writ appeal is hereby condoned. 5) Learned counsel for the parties are heard on admission. 6) The appellants have fiied this writ appeal against the interim order dated 20.07.2010 passed in WP(S) No.1759/2010, whereby learned single Judge has disposed of the application for interim relief in the foilowing terms : " !n the aforestated facts and circumstances of the case, it Is ordered that the process of selection may ao on, but while scrutinizing the application forms, the age criteria provided in the rules of 2005 as amended vide order dated 15-04-2008 (Annexure P-4) shali-be kept into consideration. Accordingly, IA No.2 stands disposed of." 7) During the course of hearing, Shri NK Vyas, iearned counsel for the respondent pointed out that the recruitment process is :~J'7^-^~^.:.. "T.SS^S.^'t'^'^";'-. subbu alreadv over and the same was in accordance with the above quoted observations of the learned single Judge. 8) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, we do not find any infirmity in the impugned order dated 20.07.2010 which may warrant interference in this intra Court appeal. 9) We, however, deem it necessary to direct that the writ petition itself be listed for final hearing in the week commencing 10 January, 2011. 10) With the above direction, the writ appeal stands disposed of. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinfaa Judge <a ^•S177?^'^;"' ' ^';?3^^7--f,-~^^:~^'•'^^?''^•""^""^'