IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 5683 of 2007(B) ------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. MANOJ P.JOHN, THALAPPALLIL KURISUMUTTIL, CROSS JUNCTION, THIRUVALLA. 2. ALEYAMMA ABRAHAM (CO-OBLIGANT), THALAPPALLIL KURISUMUTTIL, CROSS JUNCTION, THIRUVALLA. 3. ALEYAMMA JOHN, KALEECKALPADICAKL PUTHENPEEDIKA, ANGADICKAL SOUTH, P.O.CHENGANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORAITON, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, BRANCH OFFICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY SRI.V.B.UNNIRAJ, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 5683 OF 2007 B ==================== Dated this the 26th day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T In this writ petition, the petitioners are attempting to get their liability to the KFC liquidated by availing of the benefit of One Time Settlement Scheme. The contention now raised by the KFC is mainly that petitioners have not made a concrete proposal so far and that the offers that were made earlier were not acceptable to them. To this, the petitioners offer that a concrete proposal will be made by the petitioners in order to avail of the benefit of the present OTS scheme which is in vogue and that they will make such an offer within one week from today. 2. Taking into account the submission made by both sides, I direct that if the petitioners are so advised, they may make an offer as stated above to the 2nd respondent, at any rate, within one week from today. If such an offer is received from the petitioners for availing of the benefit of OTS scheme, the same WPC 5683/07 :2 : shall be considered by the respondents and a decision shall be taken. 3. It is directed that if the petitioners make an offer as stated above, until final orders are passed in the offer so made, the interim order passed by this court dated 1/3/07 will remain in force. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp