IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 19TH DECEMBER 2008 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 WP(C).No. 32905 of 2008(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RAJAN, AGED 46, S/O.GOPALAN, MAROTTIKKAL HOUSE,P.O.THRITHALLOOR WEST, VATANAPPILLY AMSOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT SRI.RANJIT BABU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR ,COLLECTORATE, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR. 2. VATANAPPILLY GRAMA PANCHAYATH VATANAPPILLY ,THRISSUR ,REP.BY THE SECRETARY. 3. THE SECRETARY VATANAPPILLY GRAMA PANCHAYATH THRISSUR . 4. ARAVINDAKSHAN,KANNAMPRAMBIL HOUSE P.O.,THRITHALLOOR WEST, VATANAPPILLY AMSOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.N.RAGHURAJ FOR R2,3 SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY FOR R2,3 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. M.R. SABU. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: W.P.C.NO. 32905/2008 -------------------------------------------------------------------- EXT. P1TRUE COPY OF PLAN. EXT.P2 BUILDING PERMIT DT. 21-8-2008. EXT.P3 ORDER PASSED BY R1. EXT.P4 REVISED PLAN OF THE BUILDING. EXT.P5 STOP MEMO DT. 24-10-2008 [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE. S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 32905 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 19th December, 2008. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is the owner of a building in which he intends to construct a family temple. Originally, the plan was approved and a building permit was issued to the petitioner. But the petitioner submits that to satisfy 'Vasthu Rules', the petitioner was forced to make some minor alterations in the plan. On account of the alterations made, a stop memo was issued to the petitioner. The petitioner is stated to have submitted Ext. P6 representation in the matter before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P6. 2. Counsel for the Panchayat submits that he may be given some time to ascertain whether Ext. P6 has been received by the Panchayat. I do not think that for that purpose the disposal of this writ petition should wait, if appropriate safeguards are made in this judgment. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P6, if the same has been received and is pending, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/