1 caf30 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.30 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.635 OF 1998 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.Rahul Walvekar for the Applicant Mr.M.S.Oberoi i/b Mr.V.V.Sanglikar for respondent CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : MARCH 4,2011 P.C.: 1 Heard Advocate for the applicant. The application is opposed by the advocate for the respondent. Appeal filed by the applicant has been dismissed for non prosecution on the ground of failure to comply with the conditional order dated 8th February 2002. It is stated that the applicant was not aware of the fact that the conditional order was not complied with. Reasons have been assigned as to why the conditional order could not be complied with. Hence, a case is made out for 2 caf30 restoration. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c) subject to compliance with the order dated 8th February 2002 within eight weeks from today. If compliance is not made within stipulated time, order of dismissal will stand. JUDGE