1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.743 OF 1999. Amrut Ambadas Bhadarge and another ... Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents. ... Mr.S.D.Kaldate, advocate for the petitioners. Mrs.R.K.Ladda, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for the State. ... CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 06.08.2010. ORAL ORDER (Per S.V.Gangapurwala,J.) 1. The petitioners impugn the Circular dated 8.7.1999, issued by the Government of Maharashtra and the letter dated 8.12.1998 issued 2 by the Divisional Commissioner, so also the Circular dated 18.12.1998 issued by the Government of Maharashtra. 2. The petitioners claim that the said Circular issued by the State Government, has resulted in stopping the development work and providing amenities to the residents. The Circulars lay down the steps that are required to be undertaken by the Municipal Council for generation of the funds and to curtail the expenses. 3. The same is the policy decision of the State. This Court would not interfere with the policy decision of the State unless the said policy is arbitrary or unreasonable. Perusal of the said circulars shows that the said directions are in public interest. We do not find the said policy to be irrational or arbitrary. 4. In light of the above, the Writ 3 Petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (B.R.GAVAI,J.) asp/office/wp74399