IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5823 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 5823 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 5823 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 655 OF 2005 APPEAL NO. 655 OF 2005 APPEAL NO. 655 OF 2005 Mr.Thakursingh Ajitsingh Kalyani. ] .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra. ] .. Respondent Mr.Jayesh B. Kocheta for the applicant. Mr.S.S. Pednekar, A.P.P., for the respondent-State. CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 03RD OCTOBER, 2005 P.C. : 1. Learned counsel for the applicant states that this application for bail was filed on the ground that the wife of the applicant is to undergo the operation. The wife has already undergone the operation. Learned counsel submits that, therefore, this application has become infructuous. Hence application is disposed of as infructuous. [SMT.RANJANA [SMT.RANJANA [SMT.RANJANA P. DESAI, J.] P. DESAI, J.] P. DESAI, J.] : 2 : [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]