IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7517 of 2010 1. JANARDAN YADAV SON OF LATE KANAKARI YADAV 2. SITA DEVI WIFE OF JANARDAN YADAV, BOTH RESIDENT OF NARAPATTI BISHTIRIA, P.S. RANIGANJ, DISTRICT ARARIA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioners : Mrs. Kumari Ritambhara, Adv. For the State : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, A.P.C. For the informant : Mr. Ajit Ranjan Kumar, Advocate. ------ 2/ 18.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the Informant and the learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case instituted under sections 376, 314, 315, 316 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. According to the F.I.R. co-accused Dilip Yadav, by giving false assurance of marriage, developed illicit relationship with the informant and that illicit relationship continued for about six months, as a result of which the informant became pregnant. When the informant pressurized for solemnization of marriage then these two petitioners, who are parents of the aforesaid co-accused Dilip Yadav, are said to have administered some medicines as a result of which there was miscarriage. In view of the aforesaid serious nature of allegation, this Court is not persuaded to accede to prayer made on behalf of the petitioners for grant of bail. The - 2 - prayer for bail is hereby rejected. However, if the petitioners surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and make a prayer for bail, then the court below shall consider the same on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J ) BTiwary/