IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 184 of 2009 Sher Mohammad @ Sheru S/o Abdul Rashid ........ Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ........ Respondents Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. 2. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; document filed by the parties; and perusal of the case diary, I do not find that the petitioner is entitled to get the reliefs claimed in the writ petition. 3. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. 4. I am refraining from commenting on the merits of the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioner’s case at the trial, which is yet to start. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 10.04.2009 Shiv