IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24985 of 2008 1. SRI RAM MAHTO 2. RAM BALAK MAHTO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 26.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a Police case under Sections 302, 201 of the Penal Code. The deceased is stated to be the wife of petitioner no. 1 and petitioner no. 2 is the brother-in-law. Earlier the Chaukidar is stated to have lodged an F.I.R. of a suspicious death by poison. The parties are stated to be married 20 years ago. Subsequently the Chaukidar said that the F.I.R. was based purely on hearsay. Learned counsel for the State from the case diary submits that the petitioner no. 1 was the Compounder. The Doctor was suspected to have illicit relation with the wife of petitioner no. 1 leading to the suspicion of poison. However, it is fairly conceded that there is no material in support of the suspicion of illicit relationship. Given the nature of investigation carried out by the Police, let the petitioners, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Pupri, Sitamarhi in Nonpur P.S. case 2 No. 82 of 2004, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)