IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.5551 of 2010 VIJAY YADAV, son of Shiv Shanker Yadav Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 22.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 25(1-b) a /26 /35 of the Arms Act. As per the F.I.R., the informant recovered one country made loaded gun and some live cartridges from his house and on enquiry, the same transpired to be that of one, Hari Nandan Yadav and this petitioner. Learned counsel submits that recovery was neither made from his conscious possession nor from his house. He further submits that there was partition in the family and in support of the same, learned counsel produced a separate rent receipts issued in respect of certain land within Wazirganj Anchal. He further submits that petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent. The grounds mentioned by the petitioner would be relevant for regular bail. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, if he surrenders before the court below (Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Wazirganj P.S. case no. 55 of 2009) within six weeks from today and seeks for regular bail, the same would be disposed of preferably on the same day without being prejudiced by this order. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)