^' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUOIGATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. !"l®3 OF 2005 PETITIONER vs RESPONDENTS, —% ^.^. '^^' ..••'' .<3;s .*• ^^ ^.M"y J^^y •** *. •*1y *'*' /' ..*' ..<v " *** <-r^ R.S. Tiwari, son of Shri Tikaram Tiwari, aged about 46 years, Oecupation AG- III, Tehsili Offiee, Navagarh, District Janjgir 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. ^2. The Collector, Janjgir. ^S. Shri Onkar Yadu,Presently posted as Deputy Collector, Dhamtari. WRLT PETITIONUWDEIR ARl'I®I,E^!^6>%2a'7ai@!%l®HE; CONSTl'TUTlONOt^NiaS; 1-J....-^- la XI-HC-78 ^^Fti?i^STftwre,sf^irag<; ,. . /A/lf. 7' *llMCtl gi'ITRF • •><^.i...'. A-A .... . y^^ 2< s- 3!KS!>|toi<shJ(^c|!^«|i^r) 3n^T^rf^N> aW3<i^)*Ki+ waTW.Hfiirsn^r .^-" ^' .A' x' SiwSl Wlfel^TllTOffft'teStRRSre ^srf^Tan^T 15.3.2005 Shri Ajit Singh,counsel for -^he petitioner; Heqrd on admission. I Learned • counsel for the p^titioner Submits that in a domestic enquiry, held against the petition4r, the petitioner was punished with the order dated t3.12.2004(Annej<ure P-1). He furthersybmits thot though the order is appellable under the provisions of AA.P.Civil Services ( Ctassification, Control petitioner has not filedany appeal 'cnd Appeals) Rules 196&; but the befopetheappelldteauthority. He seeks permission to wil)hdraw this petition witha liberty' to file appeal before the competentijtuthority. Since an alternative remed^ is available to the petitioner, there is no impediment in granting per^nissionof witfidrdwcl of the petition on the dbove terms, The prayer is allowed. The petition is ctismissed as withdriMwn with a liber'tY to 1+ie petitioner to file dn appeal be-flore the oppropriate authority urider the pr'ovisions of aforesaid Rules of 1966. The petition js finally disp<jsed of. ~&df- s.«a1SS SittVta ^r^. •B •S :;': W w }• 1 ^t^ Si'faa M i:li ssas SM Mil B8