Int. Rel. App. No. 3106 of 2004 In W.P. No. 1955 of 2003 (S/S) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Mr. S.S. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the controversy raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court dated 23.10.2003 passed in writ petition No. 1236 of 2003 (S/S), which is contained in Annexure 7 to this writ petition. Learned Sanding counsel for the State does not dispute this submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed in terms of the judgment dated 23.10.2003 passed in writ petition No. 1236 of 2003 (S/S). Petitioner’s seniority shall also be decided in accordance with the directions given in the said judgment dated 23.10.2003, which is contained in Annexure 7 to this writ petition. Sd/- Dt. 21.06.2004 G