1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1747 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4770 OF 1996 Pandarinath Laxman Chandare & Ors. .. Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. And Rajubai Muralidhar Sukhija & Ors. .. Applicants. Mr.Deepak Thakre with Mr.Suresh Dubey for the applicants. Mr.A.H.Palekar for the petitioner in writ petition. Mr.S.D.Rayrikar A.G.P. for respondent no.1 - State. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 7TH AUGUST, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this civil application, the applicants have prayed for an order against the petitioners not to develop, construct on the suit property and/or sell, transfer or alienate the same, pending hearing and final disposal of the writ petition. The writ petition was admitted and the interim relief was also granted on 7.2.1997. It is still pending for final hearing. The applicants apprehend that the petitioners may either develop or create third party rights in the suit property. Mr.Palekar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that to the best of his information the petitioners do not intend to do so. Keeping that 2 in view and considering that the interim relief, that was granted at the stage of admission, in my opinion, the ends of justice would be met if the parties are directed to maintain status quo till disposal of the writ petition. Order accordingly. Liberty to the parties to apply. Civil application is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)