THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition Nos.32002 and 32007 of 2011 Dated 05th December, 2011 Between: Smt.P.Ramanamma …Petitioner (W.P.No.32002 of 2011) And Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, rep.by its Executive Officer, Tirupathi, Chittoor District and another …Respondents (W.P.No.32002 of 2011) Counsel for the petitioner: Sri V.Eswaraiah Chowdary Counsel for respondents: Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: W.P.No.32002 of 2011 is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, order or orders declaring the action of the respondents herein are trying to dispossess the petitioner from her business leased premises admeasuring an area of 15 x 20’ covered by zinc sheet shed erected by the petitioner near Sri Japali Anjaneyaswamy Temple, Papavinasam road, Tirumala which is exclusively belongs to Sri Swamy Hathiramji Matt, Tirupathi even without any prior notice issued to the petitioner herein as wholly arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction and void and violated the principles of natural justice and aﬀected the petitioner’s rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents herein not to interfere in the petitioner’s leased business premise in the space of 15 x 20’ situated near Sri Japali Anjaneya Swamy Temple, Papavinasam Road, Tirumala which was allotted by Sri Hathiramji Mutt, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.” W.P.No.32007 of 2011 is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “…to issue a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, order or orders declaring the action of the respondents herein are trying to dispossess the petitioner from the business leased premises in shop No.3 admeasuring an area of 15 x 20’ covered by zinc sheet shed erected by the petitioner near Arch Gate Sri Venugopalaswamy Temple, Tirumala which is exclusively belongs to Sri Swamy Hathiramji Matt, Tirupati and Tirumala even without any prior notice issued to the petitioner as wholly arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction and void and violated the principles of natural justice and aﬀected the petitioner’s rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents herein not to interfere in petitioner’s leased business premises in shop No.3 which was allotted by Sri Hathiramji Mutt, Tirupathi situated near Arch Gate, Sri Venugopalaswamy Temple, Tirumala, Chittoor District.” After arguing the case, Sri V.Eswaraiah Chowdary, learned counsel for the petitioners, while candidly admitting that his clients should not have ﬁled these writ petitions in the face of the orders, dated 16.11.2011, in W.P.Nos.30310 and 30311 of 2011, which were permitted to be unconditionally withdrawn, oﬀered apology for ﬁling these writ petitions and sought permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petitions without any right to the petitioners to initiate fresh round of litigation either before this Court or before any other Court. This request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petitions are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petitions, the interlocutory applications are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 05th December, 2011 VGB