0? Wk mgm ench j , I1V TH HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ! E WRIT PETITION {S} NO 3?g:’LOF 2009 ‘ PETITIONER 1 Dr. P.C. Jam S/o Late Shrl M.C. Jaiin‘, aged about 63 years Retlred Pr1nc1pa1 CMD College, [Bllaspur R/o Jaln‘ Mand1r Marg, Krantl Nagar, j { ' I ‘ B11aspur(CG) Versus / State of Chhattlsgarh Thro The Secretaxy Department of Hlgher Educatlon D KS Bulldlng, Mantralaya RaJpur (CG) ' 'r“ 2.’ The Comm1ss1oner Deptt of ' Hlgher Educatlon Govt Selence College Premlses Ralpur (Chhattlsgarh) RESgONDENTs‘: ‘ t _ 1. ,3 . (Director Department of H1gher Educatlon State of Chhatt1sgarh Ra1pur (CG) 4. The Pr1n01pal C M D College ‘ B1laspur (Chhattlsgarh) t f" 5. Chaurman Managmg Commlttee C M D College Bllaspur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE K CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I 1 N-..€%..La)....:51an /11=L 200 W am W (Wu) WWW WW @W $aifmm $.a HGWWLE $9E-3Q? JEJ$TICE ?E’TTLN?ER DlwaKER 24.Q7§2§Q§ Shz‘i B.D‘Gum. cams-$1 fer the pedtécmer. Shri Yashwant Singh Thak 1r, Dy‘ AG, with MS. Sunita Jain, PL. for the State, Cantention of the counsei far the petitioner is that the petitionar, who waS working as F ‘incipal in CtMD. Coilege, Bilaspur has retirad after saving abéut 3E years. He submits that though the petitioner is entitled for 1eave enc ashment of 240 days but the same has not been given to him despite his several representations According to Counsel for :"1e petitioner his case is squarely covered with the judgment of t1 e Hon’ble Apex Cour in State of Rmjasthan Vs. Samsor Higher aecondmy SchooE, Lachhmangarh &- Otherw (2005 (10} $CC 346} end therefore, in the light of the said judgment, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to fiie representation to respondent No.2. it is further submitted that direction may be issued to respondent NOQ for deciding th representation of the petitioner expeditiousiy. Learned counsel for the State has no objection if any such representation is being made by tie petitioner to respondent No.2 and the same is being decided in acco L‘dance with lawi He further submits that the representation so made i Youid he decided in accordance Wit} law . Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the iiberty as aforesaid. ln t 1e eventuaiity of the petitioner’s making such representation within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt ' of the copy of this order, the sai‘ie is expected to be decided by\the respondent No.2 within a further 3eriod of two month . Sd/— ‘ " ‘ Pritink‘er’B‘iwaker Judge / i