1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 220 OF 2010 (Punjabrao N. Ronghe vs. Ulhas Ramesh Malani & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. APRIL 21, 2010. Heard Shri Sohoni, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Mundra, learned counsel for respondent No. 1. The matter was earlier heard and required to be adjourned as there was no service on Respondent No. 2. Now that Respondent No. 2 is served but he is not present. The subsequent events in the matter show that according to Respondent No.1, the petitioner has forcibly dispossessed him and his application for restoration of possession is also rejected by the trial Court. It is pointed out to this Court that after the appeal was dismissed, Respondent No. 1 has filed another application for restoration of possession and it is pending. In this situation, I find that interest of justice can be met with by directing the petitioner to deposit with trial Court every month, the sum of Rs.1,500/- as 2 rent. The said amount shall not be allowed to be withdrawn by anybody till Civil Court decides the suit. The proceedings in Regular Civil Suit No. 255 of 2008 are expedited and trial Court is directed to decide the same as early as possible and in any case by 31st December 2010. With these directions, Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.