@m3*@ @@m% (AC J57 ’f z? IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICA TURE AT BILASPUR w.P. (g) No. §€L [2008 PETITIONER: Jagmohan Manikpuri D/O Shri Kashiram Aged about 45 years R/o village — Jondi Block— ££agnw c/v‘"‘ Dist-V Raigar VERSUS (1), Gram Panchayat , Jondi ,Through Sarpanch Tikam Sahu Gram Panchayat, Jondi Block Abhanpur ,District—Raipur ( CG.) RESPONDENTS: r Additional Collector, Raipur {C.G.) 4e) Sub-Divisional Officer Raipur, District- Raipur ( C.G.) (4) Naib Tahsildar , Navapara Tahsil — Abhanpur , Dist — Raipur (C.G.) IIVRIT PETITION U/A 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN QF INDIA Z’”/y z J; 1. )-,//r,‘ WW,WW,W W3.- Miss Deepali Pandey, cou sel for the petitioner. Heard. This writ petition has b en filed chaiienging the order dated 15.1.2008 passed by the Addi onai Coiiectcr, Raipur in the appellate jurisdiction. The petitioner is enti led to move revision before the Board of but he has directly moved the instant Revenue against the said ord , e petition before this Court for\inv king the extraordinary jurisdiction of the Court. Therefore, in the first’\instance, the petitioner ought to have approached the Board of Rev nue in revisional jurisdiction, as such, \ alternative efficacious remedy is available to the petitioner, accordingly, he should first approach the Board f Revenue. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 7 days’ time be granted to the petitioner to file a revision before the Board of Revenue against the said order and till t en the petitioner should not be removed from service. The prayer made by lear ed counsel for the petitioner is just, fair & reasonable. The petitioner is all wed to move Board of Revenue. Therefore, the responde ts should not pass any order for 7 days from today regarding removal o the petitioner herein. / Consequently, the petitio’ is disposed of. sdl' L.C.B‘\a"“° 3a¢$e / MPQQiWEGi W V“. F‘L 2008 am m (WW) i mwW w mmw-H mafia am mam ‘ 13‘6m % aifau haw