BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Seventeenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14622 of 2011 ARIVALAGAN ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TIRUNELVELI IN CRIME NO. 68 OF 2009 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.DEENADHAYALAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the accused and he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 465, 468, 471 and 420 of I.P.C. in Crime No.68 of 2009 on the file of the respondent police. 2.Heard Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner has not committed any offence of forgery, since somebody gave the name of the petitioner and other particulars to get the community certificate and he has no intention to forge the community certificate. He would further submit that the petitioner has got permanent root and he is ready to abide by any condition likely to be imposed by this Court and he will not abscond and he is ready to co-operate with the investigation. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the forged certificate has been produced by the petitioner for the selection of post of Grama Seva Mail Man(Post Man) and further it was found that the seal and signature found in the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ community certificate were forged one and therefore, the offence committed by the petitioner is a serious one and if for any reason this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, suitable stringent conditions may be imposed by this Court. 5.Considering the submissions made by both sides, I could see that the criminality as regards the forged certificate has to be considered during the investigation and the petitioner has got permanent root in the society, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but with stringent conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 7.THe petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 17/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TIRUNELVELI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TIRUNELVELI +1. CC to M/S. S.DEENADHAYALAN Advocate SR.No.40077 rl/6c – 22.11.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14622 of 2011 Date :17/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/