1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR MISC.C.A.NO.1121 OF 2009 IN C.A.O.NO.880 OF 2009 IN M.C.A.NO. 7775/2009 IN REJ.S.A.NO.186 OF 2006. Snt.Shantabai Ramnath Gurnule and ors. ..vs.. Shashikala Madhaorao Bhaskarwar =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- C ORAM : C.L.PANGARKAR, J. DATED : 12th October, 2009. Heard Mr.B.N.Mohta, learned counsel for the appellants. The applicants have filed an appeal. There were certain objections in the said appeal raised by the office. They were not removed hence the appeal was dismissed. Thereafter the restoration application i.e. M.C.A. was filed. That also was dismissed for default. Hence, these two applications have been filed for restoration of the said M.C.A. along with condonation of delay. Learned counsel for the appellants states that 2 due to inadvertence he could not remain present and therefore the objections could not be removed. Considering the contentions raised, both the applications are allowed. JUDGE. Chute