IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2011 / 22ND ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 13761 of 2006(L) ----------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- S.I.RANI, PRINCE NIVAS, ATTUKAL, PANAYAKUTTOM P.O., NEDUMANGADU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.D.KISHORE RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DEEPA.R.S., SARASWATHY BHAVAN, PLAVARA, PACHA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE MANAGER, SREE KRISHNA VILASAM HIGH SCHOOL, NANNIYODE, PACHA P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 13761 of 2006(L) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 24.3.2006 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 24.3.2006 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT OF EXHIBIT P2 BY 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 IN I.A. NO. 1553/11 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3(a) IN I.A. NO. 1553/11 : COPY OF POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 13761 of 2006-L - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of July, 2011. JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the appointment of the third respondent. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was appointed as H.S.A. (Natural Science) in S.K.V. High School from 8.6.1999 against a retirement vacancy. This appointment was not approved due to reduction of one division. Next year he was reappointed on 26.7.2000 which was approved by the District Educational Officer. During the next year, the petitioner's appointment was not approved on account of the claim put forth by the third respondent. Later, third respondent's claim was accepted and challenge against the same by the petitioner, was rejected finally by this Court in O.P.Nos.21623/2000 and 25843/2003. The third respondent's writ petition was allowed. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has filed a representation alleging the manner by which the third respondent acquired the qualification required for promotion, before the Director of Public Instruction as per Ext.P2. Apart from filing the same, wpc 13761/2006 2 he has also filed another one and a copy of the same is produced as Ext.P3 along with I.A. No.1553/2011. It is prayed that the Director of Public Instruction may be directed to take an appropriate decision in the matter. 3. I am not expressing anything on the merits of the matter. There will be a direction to the second respondent to take a decision on Exts.P2 and P3 after hearing the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/