^ as; (-'-> °^ BEFCRE THE MADKi:a PEAEESH AEMIKISmATIVE IRIBUEffl, JBP, O.A.Ko cre'iLR' of 1992 , to.l^Wo. ^^^O^ <applicsnt; Vijsy Kumer Shrivastsvs. soo. of Iste Shri B.L.Shrivasteva, saed sbout 38 yeers, resident of. 0-18 iSnupam Kaciar, Raipur, Dlstt. R&: K.P. Vs espondentss (1) The stBte of Msdhya Prei3esh throuoh the Secret sry, Commerciel T£X Department^ Govemment o£ M.P», Bhopel, M.p. CommissiQner of Seles Tsx, Madhya Praflesh, Indore, K.P, (3) 3hri N.P.S'nsrma, Assistant CoR'missioner of Seles Tax, Heedquarters, Indore, K.P. (4) Shri Ashok Kumar B?gga, Sales Tax Officer, &-.Talicr -Circle-1, Gwalior, M.P» (5) Shrl ftbhey Kumar Psndey, &satt. Commxssloner of Sales Tax Sagsif Distt. Sagar, K.p» (6) Shri A.K.Shukle, Sel.es Tex Officer, Indore Circle-7, Indore< M.P. Shri R.K.Trivedl, Seles Tsx Officer, Safcna, Dl.stt.3etns,H. (8) Shri Abdul Rehim Qureshi, Sales TBX Officer, Bilas'pur Cj.rcle-2 Bilsspur, M.P. —^ ttt o a> O" 1-ii 3' S- t£ P. & Q a s o i~J h^ o' i^ ta (B S>. 91. V t-< hj ]-'• W. t» S h3 5 11 s @s ro rt '0 <+ l-d. ^! ^f ^ •lK,(^a» €S y HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Wnt Petition (Sl No. 654 of 2005 lyr't Petittoner Vijay Ktunar Shrivastava Versus Respondents The State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chbattisgarh) & ofhers (Application U/S 19 offhe Admirustiativc Tribunals Act, 1985) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agirihotri J.) Noue for fbe petitioner. • Ms Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. O RD E R (oraU ( Passed on tbis 14& day ofSeptember, 2009) The niatter is catled for hearuag twice. On both the occasions aoue appears nor any representation is laade on behalf of thc petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested ia prosecutu^ fhe matter. !. In view of fhe foregoing, fhe petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Thakur