IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 24TH JULY 2009 / 2ND SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 18015 of 2009(V) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- CHRISTILDA BABY, W/O. RAJAMANI, MELIRUMBIL PUTHENVEEDU, IRUMBIL, NEYYATTINKARA. BY ADV. MR.T.RAVIKUMAR. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER, (KUDUMBASREE) & THE ASSISTANT, DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER. GENERAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. K.R. DEEPA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/07/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.18015 of 2009-V = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 24th day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner's complaint is that Ext.P4 is not being considered and Ext.P7 has been issued stating that the matter is pending before the High Court, however that, Ext.P6 would disclose that this Court had disposed of WP(C).1772/2009 with a direction to the Collector to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1 in that case. I am sure that the plea of the petitioner is quite misplaced because Ext.P7 is issued on 24.2.2009 while Ext.P6 judgment is issued by this Court only on the next day, 25.2.2009. Obviously, Ext.P7 is not issued after the District Collector could have had information about Ext.P6 judgment. In the aforesaid circumstances, the District Collector is directed to take a final decision in the matter in relation to Ext.P4 file at the WP(C)18015/09 -: 2 :- earliest, at any rate, within an outer limit of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/250709