IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.712 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:31.01.2011 Bal Krishan Sharma . . .Petitioner Versus Maghar Ram and others . . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Vijay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against order passed by the Rent Controller, Ludhiana dated 05.1.2011 by which evidence of the petitioner/tenant has been ordered to be closed. It is alleged by learned counsel for the petitioner that on 02.09.2009, evidence of the landlord was closed thereafter, the petitioner was leading evidence, which has been ordered to be closed by the impugned order. He submits that if one more opportunity is granted, he would complete his entire evidence, at his own risk and responsibility, subject to payment of costs. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, revision petition is allowed and order dated 05.01.2011 is hereby set aside. Petitioner is granted one last opportunity to lead his entire evidence, at his own risk and responsibility, subject to payment of `5000/- as costs. It is made clear that if the cost is not paid to the landlord by way of draft then the present revision petition shall be deemed to be dismissed. January 31, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vivek JUDGE