IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51880 of 2008 BINOD YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 14/01/2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected earlier on 16.10.2008 in Cr. Misc. No.30447/08 noticing the allegations of causing burn injuries with cigarette butts confirmed by the medical report. The aspect of compromise was also appropriately noticed when the regular bail was to be considered by the court below on its own merits, without being prejudiced by the order of rejection. Renewing the prayer for anticipatory bail, reliance is placed on an order of this Court in Cr. Misc. No.35179/08 granting anticipatory bail to certain other co-accused. In the latter order, it does not appear that the attention of the Court was drawn to the nature of the injury report noticed by this Court in Cr. Misc. No.30447/08. The application is rejected. Nonetheless, the fact remains that co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail. As such, any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall have to be 2 considered in that light, without being prejudiced by the present order. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)