^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) M.A. N0. n6fc)/2003 APPELLANT /CLAIKIANT / wmwMmsh Rajesh Mishra, aged about 32 yrs., S/o Ram Sevak, R/o Chantidih, Ramayan Chowk, Bilaspur (C.G.) !?• Nin: ^ 1 IESPONDENTS (NON-APPLICANTS) ^w ^.S^.. l^y "^' <-' G 2- '\ <>' VBRSUS 1. Mohammad Yasin alias Suruhin Chamar Khan (Truck Driver) S/o Abdul Hamid, R/b Pratapgarh, Thana : Pratapgarh (Uttar Pradesh) ^ 2. Gulani Sirvar (Owner ofTnuck), S/o Gulam Rasul, R/o Khushi, Satna, R.K. City Kotwali, Satna (M.P.) / 3. Azharul Khan (Bus Driver), S/oYushufR/o Pratapgarh, Thana Kawai, Hanuman, Pratapgarh (Uttar Pradesh) - Present Address- Ali Ahamad Transport, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Ali Ahamad Transport, Bilaspur, /f' Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Insurance Company, United India Insurance, Company Branch, New Bazar Naini, (Allahabad) [Uttar Pradesh] MISS. APPBAL U/S 173 OF THE MOTORVEHICLE ACT. Claim in appeal value Rs. 2,45,000/- Court Feesaffixed Rs. 15/- vs' IB.: ^ t. 8^ ?: s Being aggrieved by the-impugned award dated 30.10.2003 passed in claim case No. 9)^000 by Shri F.L. Unjan ^•th Additional Motor Accident Claims tribunal, Bilaspur (C.G.) the appellant preferred this memo of appeal on the following fact and grounds amongst others. Ki. R XI-HC-22 sn^rqir R-fi<+3n^T sbt|[<!hdf?(T sadma ^IB^ifS'i T5T -i<l'i||]n<), ®TTl'H'16,RlMIUy 3T1^7T ^ qsTch HI*1MTSh11*^PftA--^".^^ 200$ Ri'b^ """""""""" 311^1 g'WIWHfgcT 16.01.2007 None for the appellant. None for respondents Nc^ Shri Shanshyam Patel, co Once the case has been but for want of appearance on over. Now, the co.se has been the appellant, hence the appea! 'hi<iFci41-t >iiH?iTffte<^l'<Ri«i< ^sri^iTsn^r ^. 1 & 2. pnsel for respondent No.3. 4alled out during the course of the day, behalf of the appettant, it was passed ^alled out again, but npne appears for (s dismissed for want of appearance. Sd/- V.K. Shrivastava Judge (<^y^)