Crl. Misc. No. M- 4254 of 2009 Bidhi Chand vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr.Ashwani Talwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sidharth Sarup, AAG, Haryana. **** The following order was passed by this Court on 13.2.2009:- “Notice of motion for 21.4.2009. In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be admitted to interim bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. However, he shall join the investigation as and when called and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.” Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted the parties were related to each other. Civil litigation was also pending between the parties. On the date of alleged agreement to sell a relinquishment deed was executed by Daya Ram in favour of complainant Som Nath. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Ramesh Kumar, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation and is not required for further investigation. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the order granting interim bail dated 13.2.2009 is made absolute. (SABINA) JUDGE April 21, 2009 anita