-X ^- 1 CA£ INTHE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH C^ AT BILASPUR F.A.M. No. ll('9> Hajra / 2010 (D.B.l ABPELLANT fON-APPLICANT ,.l^ ^^-^\ ^> .....•••;:;;"...:-^^'' ^<^^^"J\^' ^•L^^^^'' ^•s^ VERSUS REJS^ONDENT A^PLICANT ?nit. Animika Daughter of Shri B.N. Mandal, aged about 30 years, at present R/o N.M.D.C. Majhganwa, P.S.- ^t>^- Mandla, TahsilPanna. £M.P,3 'Abhimanu Hajra, S/o Late Shri Prashant Hajra, R/o Near Jhanda Chowk, Behind ICE Factory Khushalpur, P.S.- Purani Basti Tahsil and Distt. Raipur (C.G.) , i^o APPEAL UNDER SECTIONT9 OF THE FAMILY COURT R/W 28 OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT. ^ — ^ IS i >' ^ ^. ATOcdant H!aijCQUI^OB<9^ biyiSIONBENCH: HON'BLE MR. I.M.OU&&USI & HON'BLE MR.6ULAM MINHAJU&DIN. JJ. , F.A. (M)No. 148/2010 Smt. AnimJko Hajra Vs RcjBxwtents Abhimanu Mkxjra Prctent: Mr. H.V, Stornia, Advocate for the appedant ^r. P.K. Saxena, Advocate for the respondCTit, OR&ER fOrttl) (16th Jun®,2011) I.M. Ouddusj. J; 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the appelkxnt has ^ibmitt'cd 1+iat shce the responctent has filed an appeal agoinst the decree dated 5.8.20C passed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act in Civil Case No.4-A/2008, the oppellant does not want to press -riijs appeal at this stage and wants to wil+idraw the same. 3. In view of -riie above submiasion, the instant cppeal is djsmissed as withdrawn, Sd/- Sd/- t G.Minhajuddin I.M.Quddusi I Judge Judge -^