IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40393 of 2009 ROUSHAN PRAVEEN, W/O Md. Juman, R/O Ward No.18, Supaul, P.S. & District Supaul -----Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.12.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged against the petitioner, who is apprehending her arrest in a police case, is under sections 323 and 376/34 of the Penal Code. It is submitted that the specific allegation is against co-accused, who happens to be the son of the petitioner. The allegation against the petitioner is that she requested the guardian of the complainant to allow her to teach her daughter in her house. The learned APP appearing for the State is not in a position to refute the above submission. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of her arrest or surrender in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No.210/08 within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail 2 bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)