IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39601 of 2010 SADANAND SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 02. 24.11.2010 On the submission of final form disclosing the commission of the offence under Sections 127 and 130 of the Representation of People’s Act read with Section 188 of the I.P.C., after completion of the investigation of Kharik P.S. Case No. 55 of 2009, the order of summoning was passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Naugachia on 12.11.2009. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of cognizance and summoning aforesaid. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has attempted to take the Court through some of the documents which have been annexed to the present petition and attempted to impress upon the Court that summoning of the petitioner was an abuse of the process of the Court. But after considering the Annexures, especially Annexure-2, the Court finds that there was a prima facie case that the petitioner had allegedly 2 established or had started running the office of a particular political party six days prior to the date from which it was duly permitted to be done by Annexure 2. It clearly appears a case in which the court ought to have passed the summoning order and considering that, the petition is dismissed. Saurabh ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)