IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7559 of 2009 Monohar Yadav, son of Late Ram Bahadur Yadav, resident Of Village-Sohta, Police Station-Chhatapur, District-Supaul. ……….Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ………………………………Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 13. 10. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is submitted that a Special Case No. 5 of 2008, arising out of Chhatarpur P.S. Case No. 35 of 2008 (G.R. No. 281/08) under Sections 15/18 of the N.D.P.S. Act is continuing in the court of Shri R. K. Sanyal, Sessions Judge, Saharsa. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the land in question was given to co-accused Mahendra Yadav for cultivation and as such petitioner is not aware for alleged plantation of opium. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State submits in view of the fact that trial is continuing and the nature of the allegation, the petitioner does not deserve to be enlarged on bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to allow the bail application of the petitioner. Hence his prayer for bail is hereby rejected. However, trial court is directed to expedite the hearing of the trial. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)