IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38356 of 2010 PANKAJ SINGH SON OF RAM AYODHYA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.11.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence u/ss.304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that initially the informant alleged that his daughter had been killed by her in-laws for ends of dowry, but thereafter he filed a petition that she had died accidentally and there was no demand for dowry. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 22.7.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-4th, Danapur in Dulhin Bazar P.S. case No.74 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he 2 fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The Magistrate concerned is directed to expedite the commitment of the case and the trial court, in seisin of the case, will also ensure early recording the statement of the witnesses in view of the likely out come of the trial. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )