IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 55 OF 2010 SHRI LUIS FRANCO DE SOUZA ... Petitioner Versus SHRI GOVIND XETE COULECAR ALIAS GURUDAS KAULEKAR ... Respondent Shri A. D. Bhobe, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri J. P. Mulgaonkar, Advocate for the Respondent, absent. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 30th July, 2010 P.C.:- Heard Shri A. D. Bhobe, learned Counsel on behalf of the Petitioner. The Petitioner herein is Judgment Debtor in Execution Application No.29/2007/B. By virtue of the decree passed, the Judgment Debtor was required to construct rear steps, shed, wash basin and a chamber in a property which according to the learned Counsel was a common property. The objections taken by the Judgment Debtor have been dealt with by the learned executing Court in para 10 which reads as follows:- "The contention of ld. advocate V. Bhivshet for the judgment debtor that it is the common property and therefore the judgment debtor cannot execute the decree; the Panchayat has not granted the license or that there is a well near the proposed construction of wash basin, soak pit, pipes etc. cannot be entertained in the present execution application as the court cannot go beyond the decree. Once the decree is passed, it is the duty and obligation of the court to assist the decree holder in execution and enforcement of the same by taking recourse to all the powers conferred by law". In case the Judgment Debtor requires time to obtain permissions, etc. he is always free to apply for the same to the concerned authorities as rightly observed by the learned executing Court. The decree is in force and it is obligatory for the trial Court to execute it. I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition in extraordinary jurisdiction. The petition is dismissed. In case the Petitioner/Judgment Debtor requires any extension of time he may approach the executing Court. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.