1 Cri.Appln.No.2212/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2212 OF 2011 Medikonda Sheshu Kumar s/o Prabhakar Rao = APPLICANT VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra = RESPONDENTS Mr.SJ Salunke, Advocate for Applicant; Mr.NR Shaikh, APP for State ----- CORAM : A.H.JOSHI & A.R.JOSHI,JJ. DATE : 7th October, 2011. PER COURT: 1) Heard. 2) We find that the word `instigation' which is considered to be an essential ingredient to constitute an offence of abetment, does not, in so many or accurate words, appear in the FIR in question, which is sought to be quashed by the applicant. 3) At this stage, we cannot measure or gauge the contents of the FIR with the precision of a vernier caliper. In this view of the 2 Cri.Appln.No.2212/2011 matter, we decline to entertain the Criminal Application. 4) The applicant's remedy, to agitate the grievance, when charge sheet is filed, shall not remain unaffected. 5) With these observations, the criminal application is disposed of. (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.H.JOSHI,J.) bdv/