IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7296 of 2010 CHANDRA SEKHAR PRASAD SINGH S/O SRI RAM UDGAR SINGH R/O VILL.- GARH BARUARI, P.O.- GARH BARUARI, P.S.- SUPAUL, DISTT.- SUPAUL ………… Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. A.I.G. OF POLICE (PERSONNEL), BIHAR, PATNA 4. D.I.G. OF POLICE, TIRHUT RANGE, MUZAFFARPUR 5. THE THEN S.P., SHEOHAR CUM CHAIRMAN OF CONSTABLE SELECTION COMMITTEE, TIRHUT RANGE, BOARD-1, MUZAFFARPUR 6. THE S.P., MUZAFFARPUR CUM MEMBER, CONSTABLE SELECTION COMMITTEE, TIRHUT RANGE, BOARD-1, MUZAFFARPUR 7. THE DEPUTY S.P., HQR, MUZAFFARPUR CUM MEMBER, C.S.C., TIRHUT RANGE, MUZAFFARPUR 8. THE DISTRICT COMMANDANT, HQR, MUZAFFARPUR CUM MEMBER, C.S.C., TIRHUT RANGE, BOARD-1, MUZAFFARPUR 9. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, MUZAFFARPUR 10. THE THEN S.P., VAISHALI CUM CHAIRMAN, CONSTABLE SELECTION COMMITTEE, BOARD-2, TIRHUT RANGE, MUZAFFARPUR ………… Respondents ----------- 2. 27/01/2011 Petitioner’s claim is for consideration of his case for appointment as Constable against Advertisement No.1 of 1998. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the writ application of the petitioner filed in 1999 along with one another candidate was withdrawn by mistake in terms of Annexure-6 as the case of other petitioner of the case was considered subsequently by the respondents. Since the writ application of the petitioner stood withdrawn, though mistakenly, remedy of the petitioner was by 2 way of review application and not by way of a fresh writ that too preferred after five years of withdrawal of the said writ application. The present writ application is dismissed. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)