1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 57 of 2011 Smt Ayesha and anr v. The WCL and anr -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr A.M. Quazi, Advocate for petitioners Mr A.S. Mehadia, Adv for respondents Coram: B. P. Dharmadhikari & A. P. Bhangale, JJ Dated: 16th August 2011 1. Petitioner no.1-widow claims employment on compassionate ground for petitioner no. 2 on the ground that petitioner no. 2 is her adopted son. Mr A.S. Mehadia, learned counsel for respondents points out that in Mohamedan Law, there is no concept of adoption. He further submits that in PS-3 Form submitted that deceased employee under the provisions of the Coal Mines Provident Fund Act, he had declared that he had two sons. In LTC claim also, the deceased employee had mentioned the name of one of the two sons in the year 1997. 2. It is obvious that there are disputed facts involved which cannot be resolved satisfactorily in the writ jurisdiction. At this stage, Mr Quazi submits that petitioner no. 2 is giving up claim for grant of compassionate employment. It is urged that as mentioned in affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of respondents, 2 petitioner no.1 should be paid honorarium. Mr A.S. Mehadia states that if petitioner no.1 makes compliance with necessary formalities as stated in the affidavit, honorarium will be paid to her. 3. In view of the statements made by respective counsel, petitioner no. 1 shall contact the office of concerned respondent at the earliest and after due compliance, respondents shall take suitable decision about payment of honorarium to petitioner no. 1 within a period of six weeks thereafter. With these directions, writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Judge Judge joshi