... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.913 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.913 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.913 OF 2007 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri N.N.Bhadrashete for the Petitioner. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 12, 2007. DATE : FEBRUARY 12, 2007. DATE : FEBRUARY 12, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. By this Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner who is one of the Defendants has challenged the order dated 08th January, 2007 by which an Application for amendment of the plaint has been allowed. Considering the nature of the impugned order, the same can be always subjected to challenge in an Appeal which may be preferred by the Petitioner against the decree passed in the suit if the said decree is adverse to the Petitioner. It is obvious that the Petitioner will be entitled to file additional written statement to the amended plaint. Subject to what is stated above, Writ Petition is rejected. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE