IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN THURSDAY, THE 14TH OCTOBER 2010 / 22ND ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 29869 of 2010(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.R.SEEMA, U.P.S.A., P.M.U.P.SCHOOL, SOUTH PARAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE OFFICER, THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (GENERAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY G.P.SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------ W.P.(C).No.29869 OF 2010 ------------------------------ Dated this the 14 th day of October, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner was appointed as UPSA in P.M.U.P School, South Paravoor, Ernakulam District for the period from 1.4.2005 to 31.3.2006 in a leave vacancy, when Sumitha P.Sreedhar took leave without allowance for that period. The Assistant Educational Officer rejected the proposal for approval of the appointment of the petitioner on the ground that the leave applied for by Sunitha P.Sreedhar was not sanctioned by the Government. The Manager challenged the order passed by the Assistant Educational officer, in appeal before the Director of Public Instruction. The appeal was dismissed as per Ext.P4 order dated 17.12.2007. Challenging Ext.P4 order, the petitioner has filed Ext.P5 revision dated 29 th September, 2010 before the Government. The revision was filed after the filing of the Writ Petition. W.P.(C).No.29869 OF 2010 2 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for the time being, it is sufficient, if a direction is issued to 3 rd respondent to dispose of Ext.P5 revision expeditiously, leaving open the contentions of the petitioner. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as follows: a) The third respondent shall dispose of Ext.P5 revision dated 29 th September,2010 as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment and after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, the Manager and any other affected party. W.P.(C).No.29869 OF 2010 3 b) The petitioner shall produce a copy of the Writ Petition and certified copy of the judgment before the third respondent. K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE. cms