1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.11.2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN W.P.(MD)No. 12491 of 2011 B.Jayalakshmi ...Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner, Madurai City Corporation, Anna Maligai,Madurai -22, Madurai District. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated on 6.9.2011 within a stipulated period as may be fixed by this Court and pass any other appropriate orders which may deem fit and proper in the nature and circumstances of the case. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sundar For Respondent : Mr.Ravi Sankar Standing Counsel for Madurai Corporation O R D E R The short prayer of the petitioner in this Writ Petition is only to direct the respondent to consider her representation dated 6.9.2011 for the sanction of building plan submitted by her. 2. Heard Mr.R.Sundar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.M.Ravi Sankar, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent. 3. The petitioner purchased a plot of land in Survey No. 121/2, Madakkulam Village, Madurai South Taluk, measuring an extent of 2280 square feet in a Sale Deed dated 17.9.2007. She also purchased another plot in the same Survey number, of an extent of 3,960 square feet, under another Sale Deed dated 13.3.2008. Thereafter, she applied to the respondent for the sanction of the building plan. She also made a representation dated 6.9.2011. Since, the representation did not meet with any response and the building plan was not sanctioned, the petitioner has come up with the above Writ Petition. 4. Today, the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation produced a letter dated 4.11.2011, informing the petitioner that the building plan sanction application has been rejected on the ground that the land is located in an area reserved for public purposes. The copy of the communication of the respondent is handed over in Court to the counsel for the petitioner. Therefore, now the petitioner has to work out his remedy against the communication dated 4.11.2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. Since the only prayer of the petitioner in this Writ Petition stands satisfied with the issue of the communication dated 4.11.2011, nothing more survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition. Hence, it is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his remedies against the communication dated 4.11.2011. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AS) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To, The Commissioner,Madurai City Corporation, Anna Maligai,Madurai -22, Madurai District. +1cc to Mr.R.Sundar, Advocate, Sr.No.38609 ses ssk/14.11.2011 /3c -2p/- W.P.(MD)No.12491 of 2011 9.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/