In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A No. 347 of 1987 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.9.2008. Brahami Devi and others ..... Appellants vs State of Punjab and others ... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: None for the appellants. Mr. B. B. S. Teji, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. None for the private respondents. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present appeal is to the award of the learned court below whereby in proceedings under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the 1894 Act'), the claim made by the appellants for apportionment of compensation was dismissed. The facts as disclosed in the award of the court below are that vide notification dated 14.12.1982, issued under Section 4 of the 1894 Act, the State of Punjab, acquired the land situated in the revenue estate of Village Hardo Hariput, Tehsil and District Ropar, for construction of Sutlej Yamuna Link Canala. The Land Acquisition Collector pronounced his award on 7.9.1983. Subsequently, on reference under Section 30 of the Act, the learned court below vide award dated 3.10.1986 while disposing the claim of the parties on merits opined that the respondents herein have been shown as co-sharer in the revenue records pertaining to the acquired land. The Collector was directed to prepare the fresh Fard Bachat containing their names, share and amount of compensation payable to them. However, there is no stay of the impugned award meaning thereby that the direction contained in the impugned award must have been carried out. The appeal pertains to the year 1987 and the acquisition pertaining to the year 1982. However, no one has appeared for the appellant. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 19.9.2008 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge