1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR L.P.A. NO. 21/11 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1671 OF 2008. Shri Sai Shikshan Sanstha, Washim .vs. Sachin Prakash Paralkar & another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. Amol Deshpande, Advocate for appellant, CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 31, 2011. This appeal is preferred against the judgment of the learned Single Judge refusing to interfere with the order of the School Tribunal. The School Tribunal has held that the appellant society obtained a fake resignation from the respondent no.1 at the time of his entry into service and, therefore, there was no resignation. The other defence of the appellant seems to have been that respondent’s services were terminated on account of unauthorised absence in spite of communication by certain letters, about which there are serious doubts since they have been said to have been sent 2 by U.P.C. The learned Single Judge has refused to interfere with the findings of fact. We see no reason to interfere with the judgment of the learned Single Judge. Firstly, we see no reason why it was necessary for the appellant to resort to the termination of services of respondent no.1 if the resignation was genuine. Further, the findings regarding the non-communication of the letters said to have been sent by U.P.C. are pure findings of fact which are based on evidence. Hence, there is no reason to interfere with those findings of fact. Hence, the L.P.A. is rejected. Judge Judge J.