IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.2943 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 05, 2011. Ramandeep Kaur .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Ms.Sonia G.Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners seek quashing of the Advertisement dated 13.1.2010 (Annexure P-2) to the effect it considers only those candidates eligible for the posts of English Masters/Mistresses who have English as an electric subject in graduation. During the course of hearing learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by this Court vide order dated 11.8.2011 passed in CWP No.4379 of 2008 (Sukhpal Rani versus State of Punjab and another). CWP No.2943 of 2010 [2] The writ petition is accordingly allowed in terms of the afore- stated decision of this Court in Sukhpal Rani's case (supra). Dasti. September 05, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE