:^h^^^. ^. y::' ^^!n-Q -p .1°^' IN THE HONBLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (Q No. ^lf^b /2011 Petitioner : Versus Respondents /'-.1. ^2. ^o. '•^.^•A ^ a^- ^sw^ ^^........- .......Y-i-W. .4. Ketka Ram S/o Bidur Sai, Aged about 50 years, R/o Munda Para, Tahsil - Pattalgaon, Distt. Jashpur-(C.G.) State ofChhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Jashpur-(C.G.) The Sub Divisional Offlcer (Revenue), Pattalgaon, Distt. Jashpur-(C.G.) The Tahsildar, Pattalgaon, Disttl Jashpur-(C.G-) 1. WRIT PETITION UNDER ART!CLE226_QFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HTOH COIJPT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BITASPUR WRTT PETITION (0 No. 6490 of2011 PETITIONER RESPOND_ENT8 Ketka Ra,m. VRR8IJS State ofChliattisgarh & Others. WRIT PElTfION LJNDER ARIICLE 226 OF THE CONSlTIVnON OF INDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Agnihotn, J. l:&resent: SliriD.K.Vishwakarma.Advocatefbrthepetitiorsen Slui P.K.Bhaduri, Patie! Lawyei' fortlie State/respondetrts. O R D E R (Passed on 03ra day ofNovember, 2011) 1. By this petitioiL the petitioner seete a direct.ion to the respondent No» 4 to demarcate the land owiied aad possessed by the petitioner afad his family members, as per the revenue record, 2. Sbri Vishwa.kamia, leamed coiiiisel appearmg fbr the petitioner submits that despite the letter dated 09.06.2009 (Amiexiire P/4) of ihe Joint Coilecton Jashpur, a-ddressed to the Tahsildar, Patthalga.on, the Tahsildar has not act.ed iipon tlie application ofthe petitioner dated 07.01.2009 fbr demarcation ofthe land and the petitioner is m difficulty a..s on a.ccoimt of delay Caused by the respondent aiitliorities, the petit.ioner is not in a. position t.o obtam possession ofthe land m dispute. 3. Shri. Bhaduri, leamed Panel La.wyer a.ppea.rmg for the Sta.te/ respondents sixbmits that it. a.ppea.rs that the a.pplication of the p^titioner has iiot been considered and .decided wit.hm the reasonable time causing inconvenience and difficiilty to the petitioner, 4, Having considered the issiie from all a-ngles, t.his Coiirt is ofthe opmion that the Colleetor Jashpiir and Tahsildar, Pattfaalga.on, may be direct.ed to look into tlie dispirte, a.8 afbrestMed, a.nd pass a.ppropriate order m a.ccorda.nce with law, osi its own merits, a.s early a.s possible, preferably within a period oftliree weeks from the date ofreeeipt ofa coov ofthis order. 5, It is ordered accordmgly-. 6. Conseqiiently, the writ petition is disposed of No order ast.o. costs. Sd/- . SatishK.AgmhoW Judge