IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3573/2010. Devi Ram @ Devendra. VERSUS Smt.Shakuntala (since deceased) through LRs & Ors. 26.03.2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Shishu Pal Singh, for the petitioner. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order by which the application submitted by the respondent No.11 for being impleaded as party under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. has been allowed. Undisputedly, the respondent No.11 is the purchaser of the property and successor-in-interest of the petitioner Devi Ram. The suit is one for partition between Devi Ram and other sharers-the respondent No.1 to 10. Whatever rights were there in the property of Devi Ram, as per the transfer now vest with Mukut Behari. In the facts and circumstances, I do not find any jurisdictional error having been committed by the learned court below in the impugned order. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.