IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5036 of 2010 Between: Sri Sarvasiddhi Uma Maheswararao ..... PETITIONER AND Neduri Meenakshi and 2 others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5036 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is the 2nd defendant in the suit O.S.220/2007 on the file of the VI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. The said suit was filed by the 1st respondent herein for permanent injunction and during course of evidence of the plaintiff, she got marked Exs.A3 to A5 through PW 2. At the time of marking the documents Exs.A3 to A5 through PW 2, the 2nd defendant did not took any objection, but on the next day he has suspected that the plaintiff might have played fraud in collusion with PW 2 in marking Xerox copies of Exs.A3 to A5 as if they are true and original documents. Therefore, he filed an application in I.A.1148/2010 under Or.18 Rule-17 CPC to recall PW 2-Mandal Revenue Officer along with original registers of Exs.A3 to A5. The Court below dismissed the said application on the ground that it is open for the petitioner/2nd defendnat to obtain the certified copies of the revenue records and establish his plea of fraud. Instead of taking any steps to get the certified copies of documents, the petitioner/2nd defendant has resorted to question the impugned order. I do not see any infirmity legal or otherwise to interfere with the impugned order. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 12.11.2010 Dsr Note: Furnish copy on 15.11.2010 B/o Dsr