1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.952 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.486 OF 2009 Pemraj S/o.Hemraj Pokharna and another APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, and others RESPONDENTS Smt.S.S.Jadhav, learned counsel for applicants. Mr.B.J.Sonwane, learned APP for respondent State. Mr.Parag Barde, learned counsel for respondent no.3 to 6 (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 05/03/2010 PER COURT : 1. Today, learned counsel for applicants and learned counsel for added respondents have filed joint criminal application before this Court to allow the amendment carried out in Cri.W.P. 486/2009 on 10/02/2010 and those respondents to be shown as added in the judgment in order dated 29/01/2010. Registry to register this criminal application and to number it. 2. Upon hearing the parties, it is a fact that on 29/01/2010, 2 application of intervention bearing Cri.Appl.No.4005/2009 was allowed and the petitioners were directed to add the intervenors as respondents in the petition. The amendment to be carried out within the course of day and by dictating judgment in the open court, the writ petition was disposed of. It appears that the amendment was not carried out within the course of that day, but was carried out on 10/02/2010, which is a mere technicality, which require to be cured. Learned counsel for respondents consented to allow the criminal application. In the premise, criminal application to which Registry to give number allowed in the following manner : O R D E R 1. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause A & B and stands disposed of. 2. Registry to issue the writ accordingly to the applicants after carrying out necessary correction in the title of original writ petition and subsequent corrections in the title of the order dated 29/01/2010. 3. Application stands disposed of accordingly. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/MAR 2010/cri.appl.952-10