IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26070 of 2000 Between: Tummaluru Vanajakshamma & others. … Petitioners AND The Land Acquisition Officer/ Revenue Divisional Officer/Sub Collector, Rajampet, Cuddapah District, & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : None Counsel for respondents 1to3&7: AGP for Land Acquisition This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26070 of 2000 ORDER:- This writ petition is ﬁled for a writ of Mandamus to direct respondent Nos.1 to 7 to initiate acquisition proceedings under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, ‘the Act’) in respect of the lands admeasuring Ac.1.41 cents in Sy.No.374/1, Ac.0.36 cents in Sy.Nos.369/2 and 373/3, Ac.1.41 cents in Sy.No.374/1, Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.337, Ac.0.12 cents in Sy.No.298 and Ac.0.15 cents in Sy.No.299 of Mannuru Village, Rajampet Mandal, Cuddapah district. At the hearing, there is no representation for the petitioners. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, on instructions, submitted that subsequent to the ﬁling of this writ petition, land acquisition proceedings were initiated and Award No.20 of 2002 was passed on 21.11.2002 in respect of the abovementioned lands, except the land in Sy.No.298. She says that in respect of the said land in Sy.No.298, withdrawal proposals were made. In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. If award has not been passed without any valid reason in respect of Sy.No.298, the petitioners are given liberty to make a separate claim in respect of the said survey number. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 05.09.2008 ES