IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27475 of 2008 MD. IRSHAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.08.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the petition. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offences under Section 7of the E.C. Act. It is submitted that the alleged seizure was not made from the shop of the petitioner who runs the same as Public Distribution System. It is further submitted that the seizure made by the police who was A.S.I. he was not authorized to do so as would be apparent from the governmental notification as contained in annexure-3 Having considered the submissions as noted above, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, namely, Md. Irshad be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M, Katihar in connection with Manihari P.S. Case No. 63 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J) 2