1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1005 OF 2009 Bhagvat Shankar Vedpathak ..PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENT Mr Sachin C. Havelikar, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr S.V. Kurundkar, A.P.P. for the respondent. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND R.K. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 16th December, 2009 PER COURT : Learned A.P.P. Shri S.V. Kurundkar states on instructions from the Investigating Officer who is present in Court that Pralhad Eknath Zagde who had not been arraigned as an accused though his name was disclosed in the investigation papers, has now been arrested as an accused in the said crime. On the basis of the aforesaid statement Mr Sachin Havelikar, learned Counsel for the petitioner states on instructions that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to take such appropriate steps as are available to the petitioner in law in the event it is noticed that the investigation is not conducted on proper lines. Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. ( R.K. DESHPANDE, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) amj/criwp1005.09A