IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24312 of 2010 1. MAKSUD ALAM 2. Jalina Khatoon Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 04.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Co-accused, Md. Rahman, father of this petitioner having similar allegation tried and acquitted. Certified copy of the Judgment and statement of witnesses are furnished by the petitioner. It appears that deviating from the statement under Section 161 of the Cr. P.C., witnesses turned hostile. Petitioners are husband and mother-in-law having allegation of demand and torture. Petitioner remained all along out of custody able to tamper the witnesses otherwise ligature mark is found on the neck of the deceased with specific allegation by the witnesses. So, I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)