1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.10636 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 Seventh Day Adventists School, Tenkasi, represented by its Principal M.Sundar Singh, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2. Mr.Thirupathi, The Inspector of Police, Tenkasi Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 3. A.Mookandi 4. A.Murugesan ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus forbearing the second respondent from performing illegal kattapanchayat and interfering into civil dispute subjudiced in O.S.No.481 of 2011 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi by running a parallel court. For Petitioner ... Mr.M.Murali For Respondents ... Mr.TR.Janarthanam Additional Government Pleader for R.1 and R.2 ... Dispensed with for R.3 and R.4 ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus to forbear the second respondent from performing illegal kattapanchayat and interfering into civil dispute subjudiced in O.S.No.481 of 2011 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi by running a parallel court. 2. Heard Mr.M.Murali, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.TR.Janarthanam, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. 3. In view of the order that is to be passed, notice to the respondents 3 and 4 is dispensed with. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 5. The writ petition has been filed for a mandamus to forbear the second respondent from indulging in kattapanchayat and interfering with civil dispute between the parties. According to the petitioner, the third respondent is the complainant. 6. The learned Additional Government Pleader, on instructions, states that the third respondent/complainant has withdrawn the complaint and the said issue was settled through the civil Court. 7. In such view of the matter, there is no scope for further enquiry in the matter, as the cause of action for filing this writ petition does not survive. 8. Recording the stand taken by the learned Additional Government Pleader, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2. Mr.Thirupathi, The Inspector of Police, Tenkasi Police Station, Tirunelveli District. +1cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No.32224 ss1 GH : 28.09.2011 : 2p/4c W.P.(MD)No.10636 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 19.09.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/