IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28927 of 2008 RAM UDAY SINGH, SON OF CHANDRA KETU SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PURAB SARAI, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT MUNGER. ---- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. HIMANSHU PRASAD SINGH, ADVOCATE-CUM-WORKING MEMBER, LAWYER ASSOCIATION, MUNGER, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PURAB SARAI, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT MUNGER. ---- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2 21.6.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of cognizance as well as the order passed by the Revisional Court dated 10.12.2007. The grounds raised by the petitioner is that while differing with the final report submitted by the police, the Chief Judicial Magistrate ought to have given reasons for passing the order of cognizance. The materials in the case diary have been perused by the Revisional Court and no case was made out. In the circumstances, I see no reason to interfere with the impugned orders at this stage. This application is dismissed. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)