IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7917 of 2010 VINOD KUMAR SINGH, S/O LATE RAMADHAR SINGH, R/O VILLAGE & P.S.- NONSARI, P.S.-NOKHA,DISTRICT- ROHTAS. Versus 1. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (S/S) CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE HYDERABAD. 2. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE CHENNAI. 3. THE COMMANDANT 19 BN, CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE, ROULKELA ORISSA. 4. COMPANY COMMANDER 19 BN. C.R.P.F. LATHIKATA, ORISSA. 5. THE S.H.O. P.S. NODHA, DISTRICT-ROHTAS (SASARAM) BIHAR. ----------- 02. 18.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Union of India. Against the order dated 19.2.2010, Annexure-1 passed by the DIGP, CRPF, AVADI, Chennai, Tamilnadu petitioner has remedy of revision before the I.G.P. in terms of Rule-29 of the CRPF Rules, 1955. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of with direction to the petitioner to avail the remedy by filing revision before the concerned I.G.P. who should not only condone the delay in filing the same but also consider the same in accordance with law, as early as possible, in any case within six months from the date of receipt of the revision application before him provided the revision is filed within one month from today. Rajesh/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)