IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 1022 of 2009 Between: M/s. Chandrika Crop Enterprises, rep. by its Proprietor N. Vinay Srinivas, S/o. N.K.C. Sekhar Rao R/o. H.No.1-1-565, Flat No.308, Raghavendra Apartments, Bakaram Gandhi Nagar, Hyderabad-500 020, Factory at Plot No.3, Block No.12/1, Autonagar, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND The Commissioner & Director of Agriculture, Opp: L.B. Stadium Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, A.P. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in interfering with the manufacturing and sale of the petitioner's Bio-Products like Hicure, Humic Acid, Sharp and Sword, which contains Amino Acid and Sea-weed extract, by issuing Memo No.PP.II(1)2085/2005, dated 21.01.2006, Letter No.PP.II(1)2085/2005, dated 21.01.2006 as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and without jurisdiction and further direct the respondents not to interfere with in any manner in the manufacture, sale and distribution of petitioner's Bio-Products including from the licensed premises of the dealers/stockists under the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the Fertilizers Control (Order) Act.1985 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.V.BHASKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR AGRICULTURE The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel on either side fairly conceded that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by a judgment of this Court in W.P.No.8207 of 2006 and batch dated 25- 04-2006. Therefore, this writ petition is also disposed of in terms of the above judgment. No costs. ________________ 28th January, 2009 SKM