WPCRL No. 920 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, A.C.J. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for the respondent No.3. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Rajendra Singh, the learned counsel on behalf of respondent No.3 today in court is taken on record. The petitioners as well as the parents of the petitioner No.1 have appeared in person in Court. By the order of the Court, they were directed to hold a meeting in the Chamber of the Registrar (Judicial). After the meeting, the parents have stated that they have no quarrel with the fact that her daughter is living with the petitioner No.2 and further submitted that her daughter is major. The father of the petitioner No.1 further submitted that even though the petitioners have got married and their marriage has been registered, nonetheless, they want to conduct a function according to Hindu rituals and customs. In the light of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to ensure that the petitioners are not harassed by respondent No.3 in relation to their living together. (U.C. Dhyani, J.) (Tarun Agarwala, A.C.J.) 19.10.2011 Shiv