.[1]. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.710 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2466 OF 1999 Intereast Capital Ltd., ...Petitioner. Versus Reserve Bank of India and 3 Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr.A.S.Doctor i/b M/s. Kanga & Co. Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs.Madhuri Gaikwad, i/b. T.C.Kaushik for Respondent No.3-Union of India .... CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 21, 2006. DECEMBER 21, 2006. DECEMBER 21, 2006. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned counsel for Respondent No.3-Union of India. The other respondents have been duly served. However, none appears. The learned counsel for the Petitioner undertakes to file affidavit of service within a period of one week from today. 2. By this Notice of Motion, the petitioner is seeking recall of our order dated 29th November, 2006 whereby the above Petition was dismissed in .[2]. default. 3. Perused the affidavit in support of the Motion. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Motion, sufficient cause is made out. There is no negligence, omission or inaction on the part of the petitioner in prosecuting the above matter. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 4. Place the above Petition on board for final hearing on 22nd January, 2007. [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]