IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29385 of 2008 ANIL SINGH @ SANTOSH @ CHINTOO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 5.8.2008 Heard. The allegation is that the petitioner committed robbery along with other accused persons with passersby on a particular road. When the persons of the surrounding areas challenge the petitioner and his companions they first fired shots to frighten the people but finding them concentrating upon the criminals the petitioner and his companions ascended the walls and went up the roof of a hotel. The police surrounded the hotel and after scaling the building, captured the petitioner and others. The contention is that the petitioner has wrongly been roped in the case and was not arrested at the spot and that the recovery of anything is false and fabricated and that the petitioner was arrested from his house. The further contention is that for the offences under Section 392 IPC a separate case has been registered and the present case relates only to the firing made by the petitioner and others or - 2 - as also for recovery of the cartridge from the petitioner. The court does not find any compelling reason to accept the contention that the petitioner was falsely implicated, the police did not have any grudge to implicate innocent persons in the manner as contended. Considering that the offence of the nature as alleged has become rampant and it is a hell of time for innocent ladies and passersby to travel through the street of Patna, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Petition is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )