1 1. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6525/2009 Ravindra Singh Makkar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6545/2009 Suman Godara Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 3. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6546/2009 Jagjit Kaur Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 4. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6547/2009 Rajbala Saharan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 5. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6548/2009 Manju Bhardwaj Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 6. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6558/2009 Shakila Rani Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 7. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6559/2009 Mool Singh Charan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 8. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6560/2009 Manju Bala Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 9. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6561/2009 Vikaram Dev Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 10. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6511/2009 Jai Pal Bishnoi Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 11. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6513/2009 Laxman Singh Sisodia Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 12. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6514/2009 Pratap Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 13. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6515/2009 Smt. Anjana Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 14. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6532/2009 Bhawani Singh Shekhawat Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 15. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6533/2009 Rohitas Dhaka Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER: 10.7.2009 2 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. S/Sh. Rakesh Arora, Mahaveer Bishnoi, KS Yadav and RS Choudhary for the petitioner(s). <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s). Several orders were passed in identical fact and situation and one of the order was passed in SBCWP No.4550/2009-Raj Bala Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., on 6.5.2009. In those matters, the contention of the petitioner(s) was that while making appointment to the post of Teacher Grade-III, the respondents have not adhered the preference desired by his/her/their for his/her/their posting. It was also contended that the person(s) who stood at lower pedestal than petitioner(s) were employed at the place of their choice but the same treatment was not extended to the petitioner(s). This Court observed that though the posting as per preference cannot be claimed as a right, however, the same being asked by the respondents themselves in the application form, it is expected from them to adhere the same as far as possible. In view of the above reasons, the writ petitions were disposed of by this Court directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner(s) claiming posting as per preference given by the candidate(s). 3 Following the decision referred above, it is ordered that petitioner(s) may submit the representation to the concerned authority within a period of one month from today. The authority concerned now may consider the representation of the petitioner (s) seeking his/her/their posting as per preference given by the petitioner(s) and the State Government will be free to take into account the delay while considering the petitioner's representation and if the petitioner(s) yet can be given relief then also the petitioner(s) may be given relief and may pass appropriate order. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/- 4 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.____/2009 DATE OF ORDER: 10.7.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. S/Sh. Rakesh Arora, Mahaveer Bishnoi, KS Yadav and RS Choudhary for the petitioner(s). <><><> This writ petition is disposed of (See separate judgment in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6525/2009-Ravindra Singh Makkar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided today i.e., 10.7.2009. By order Court master Court NO.5.