7.wp-8878-11.doc jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8878 OF 2011 A.I.Kapadi and Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (CIDCO) and Ors. ..Respondents Mr. M.M.Vashi along with Ms. Priyanka Vegad for Petitioners Mr. G.S.Hegde i/b M/s. G.S.Hegde and Associates for Respondent No. 1. Mr. A.A.Garge for Respondent No. 2 Mr. Sandip Ghogre for Respondent No. 3 CORAM : S.A.BOBDE AND SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J J. DATE : DECEMBER 14, 2011. P.C.: 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. 2. Petitioners are persons who have obtained permission for redevelopment of building No. F/4 at Navi Mumbai. Apparently, after building has been pulled down, the CIDCO 1 7.wp-8878-11.doc has denied No Objection Certificate on the ground that the petitioners have not complied with some Regulations. Be that as it may, parties agree that the matter be disposed of in the same terms as Writ Petition No. 4770 of 2003 decided on 18.9.2003. Accordingly, we pass the following order: 3. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that without raising other contentions and larger issues, the petitioners are willing to make an application to CIDCO, Respondent No.1 herein. He further states that petitioners will make such application within two days from today. 4. If it is so, CIDCO, Respondent No.1 herein, will consider the said application and decide the same in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within eight weeks from the receipt of such application. 5. The learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 – Corporation states that if the application will be granted and No Objection Certificate is issued by CIDCO-Respondent No. 2, plans will be considered by the Municipal Corporation and the Corporation will take an appropriate decision thereon, within a period of eight weeks thereafter. 6. The Respondent No. 2-CIDCO shall hear the Respondent No. 3 and pass a reasoned order. 7. Rule disposed of in above terms and petition is accordingly 2 7.wp-8878-11.doc disposed of, without observing anything on merits. No Costs. 8. Parties be given authenticated copies of this order. [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ S.A.BOBDE, J. ] 3