IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M CRM No. M 834 of 2010 Date of decision: 13.01.2010 Mohan Lal ........ petitioner Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Amrik Singh Kalra, Advocate for the petitioner -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) It is apparent from the order dated 09.11.2009 passed by the trial Court that the petitioner absented himself on a number of occasions and remained absent from the year 2007 till he was declared as proclaimed offender on 05.02.2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the trial proceedings have been going on since long and, therefore, the petitioner has absented himself on account of the reasons beyond his control. Without going into the merit of the matter, in case, the petitioner surrenders on or before the next date of hearing before the trial Court, his regular bail application shall be decided by the trial Court on the same day. Disposed of accordingly. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge January 13, 2010 mohan