CRR No.1193 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRR No.1193 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.01.2011 Gurmel Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Tarsem Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Addl. A.G., Punjab for the State. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the petitioner is not known as Leela Singh. He further argued that name of the petitioner is Gurmel Singh son of Jeet Singh. He also stated that petitioner shall appear before the trial Court and shall apprise the trial Court that he is not Leela Singh. CRR No.1193 of 2010 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this petition be dismissed as not pressed and time be granted to the petitioner to appear before the trial Court. Dismissed as not pressed. However, the petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on 20.1.2011. The petitioner shall be at liberty to raise all the pleas available to him under the law, at the appropriate stage before the trial Court. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 10.01.2011 sk.