THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.341 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner claims to be Welfare Union of SC, ST, BC and Minorities, and Sri K.Rajender, is said to be its President. This writ petition is filed stating inter alia that the members of the petitioner- union are in possession and enjoyment of 4,082 acres of land in different villages, of Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy, Nalgonda, Medak and Mahaboobnagar Distrticts, which, at one point of time were part of Salar Jung Estate. It is stated that the lands referred to above were held by late Yousuf Ali Salar Jung-III, and certain others as Jagir, crown grants, and Arazi Makta, and that all the properties were released in the year 1954 by the Jagir Administrator. It is also stated that the heirs of Salar Jung-III sold the parts of land to the ancestors of the members of the petitioner, about five decades ago, and that the members are in peaceful possession of their respective extents. Their grievance is that the respondents are trying to dispossess the members of the petitioner, without assigning any reasons. With these allegations, the petitioner prays for a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess its members from the land, without following the procedure prescribed by law, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. The writ petition is not maintainable, for more reasons than one: Firstly, there are several disputed questions of fact, relating to the rights of vast extents of land, spread over five or six districts. The nature of the identity of the petitioner is not clear. It is not even mentioned, whether it is registered, at all. Secondly, the lands are said to have been purchased in bits, by the ancestors of the petitioner. The purchasers or their legal representatives have to protect the rights by approaching the Civil Court, in case, they face any threat from any officials, or private individuals. Thirdly, a relief of this nature cannot be granted, particularly when huge extent of land, of thousands acre, is involved. The writ petition is not clear, as to the nature of relief against the respective respondents. It is bad, not only for joinder of cause of action, but also lack of particulars, vis-à- vis the individual members. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.25-01-2010. KO