o&yiiimNOO H^VDSII« HH3 l:-is'"8»:! ivssaa -Q-e i c-^ \} T"^: ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PmTIHKBR DIWAKER & Suresh Kiunar Saau StateofC.G. & Ofhers WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COSSTITUTIQN OF INDIA Appearance: Shri Rakesh Anffaonyj eounsel for fhe petitioner. Shri Yashwaiit Singh Thakur, Dy. A.G. wifh Shri Shashanls: Thakur, P.L. for the State. ORALORDER (15.07.2009) ChaUenge in the present petition is to the order dated 29.06.2009 (Annexure P/1) passed by fhe respondent No.l by which the petitioner who is workuig as Assistant Vetermary Field Officer, Mobile Unit has been traiisferred froin. fhe office of Depuly'Director, Vertiaaiy Services, Dur^ to Vetermary Hospital, Ulba, District Raipur. Coatentiou of couasel fdr the petitioner is fhat in his preseut piace of postuig he caiue on his own request because the petiuoner has some personal difficulty. Further it has been contended that fhe order impugned has been issued contoaiy to tlie traasfer policy of fhe Goveminent. Coiuisel for fhe State contends fhat let the petittioner niake a represeutation to the icspondent No. 1 aiid the same would be decided ia accordaace with law. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner agrees tol aiake a representation. However he subinits fhat tfll his; t3€ representation is decided, the petitioaer niay be given soiae protective order. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to fhe petitioner to inake a representation wifhia a period of tea days froni the date of copy of receipt of this order and fhe same would.be decid.ed by the authorities withiii a further period of fbree weeks froin ftie date of its receipt. It is directed that till then the petitioner shaU not be relieved from the present place of posting, if not already retieved. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge