WRIT PETITION No. ”9 or 2$ BETWEW T’ K 1. Smt'. Uma Rawat Wiéow of Late shri Ramesh Kumar Rawat. aged about 41 years, occupatlon house hold lady, resident o£ Project Colony H—4, Narayanpur District Bastar (cm'rTIseARG) ‘ ‘ 2. Umesh Kumar Rawat son of Late shri Ramesh Kumar ‘ ¥ Rawat, aged about 21 years, occupation student ,/ V&% ££t§B.A. Narayanpur Ist Years. Dlstrlct resldent Bastar of (CG). Project Colony H—4. igw’ . PETITIQNERS AND ~— The state of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Department of Tribal Welfare Mantralay. D.K,s.Building, Raipur (CG). The Director . Tribal Welfare. Raipur, Tensil and District Raipur (co). The £sistant Director, Tribal Welfare , Jagdalpur District Easter. The Collector. Jagdalpur District Bastar (CG). The Block Education officer, Nazayanpur, District Easter (CG) . RES PONDENTS x/ ETITION UNDER ARTICLES 225 227 Olav/THE 7..__ ITUTION or INDIA f’ 1. Particulars of the Petitioners As stated in the cause title above. 2. ' Particulars of the Respondents As stated'in the cause title above / / fé T p . Xi-Hc-22 i WW wéw mi, Constitution of Iudia, commanding reSpondents to gratuity to petitioner ho.1 appointment to petitioner 110‘2 1t is stated that one Ram petitioner no. 1 and father of pet respondents and he died on 1E submitted that after death c received the gratuity and representations, her case has further submitted that petitic deceaeed employee applied appointment, but the authoriti ‘ Having thns considered t the Case, material on record a the payment of pension, gr: compassionate appointment to \ \ ‘, x W‘m macaw?” ~ .I!\,.;HI°Q V. 311W mm 11%?! 17.03.2003 Shri Awadh Tripathi, Cou hsel for the Petitioner. State by Shri Ranbir S' gh, Government Advocate 011 advance capy. By thiS writ petition tiled under ArtiCle 226/227 of the the p ‘tioners pray for a direction ake payment of pension and d providing Compassionate H‘) it is directed that the petition \ , itioner no.2 was working with :. 1.2001 while inrservice. It is f her husband she has not pension and in spite of not yet been decided. It is iner no.2 who is son of th fori grant of compensate es have not issued, any order. he facts and circumstances of nd since the matter reiates to ituity and further providing the son of deceased employee, 3rs shall make representation \ \t \ WNFW 4st} Kumar Rawat, husband of e re-na‘srImm “mega - . _ £ ‘ afreshfbe¥ore the concerned authoritiesalong With a copy of . this = petition Within two week being filed, the same shall be considered and decided after hearing the petitioners, Withir representation: The representations shall pass a i d the 1 preferably within a month thei‘eafter. In case the petitioners fetal that the orders passed 1: against them, they will have 1i This petition observation aforesaid. C.C. as per rules. payments’if found due s and on such representation L two months from the date of while deciding the ‘eason% orders thereof and shall be made expeditiously is dispo Jert to file afresh. Sdl— Fakhruddin Judge y the authorities are adverse y Eed of with the direction/