IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.765 of 2010 BIPIN KUMAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 07.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that on perusal of the allegations made in the first information report it would appear that the allegation against the petitioner in sum and substance is to the effect that the amount under the Indira Awas Yojna was spent in one block only and that too without making proper verification of the persons who were entitled to receive such benefits and also without complying the government instructions. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the allegation does not discloses any element affixing criminal liability on the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State submits that matter with regard to fixing the criminal liability against the petitioner may come in course of investigation. Considering the rival submissions of the parties, let the investigation of the Haweli Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 164 of 2010 be completed expeditiously without unnecessary delay. Till submission of the report by the police after completion of investigation, let no coercive step be taken against the petitioner in connection with the above case. In course of investigation, the petitioner shall co-operate the investigating agency as and when required. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)