:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.482 OF 1994 Suresh Namdev Nimbalkar ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents ... Mr.A.S. Gadkari, for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 7th September 1993 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 5th April 1994. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have come to an end. :2: 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :3: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.802 OF 1994 Suryakant @ Chingya Baburao Kajale...Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents ... Mr. Jaydeep N. Pawar, for the Petitioner. Mr.A.S. Gadkari, for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 7th August 1993 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 21st July 1994. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have come to an end. :4: 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1302 OF 1994 Arun Mhalar Rankhambe ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents ... Mr. S.C. Halli, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 10th January 1994 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 29th January 1994. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have come to an end. :6: 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :7: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.19 OF 1997 Naresh Krishna Parab ... Petitioner versus A.C.P.,Kurla Divn. and ors. ... Respondents ... Mr. P.J. Shinde, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 16th December 1996 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 5th February 1997. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have come to an end. :8: 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :9: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.9 OF 1997 Manish Charudatta Naidu ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents ... Mr. Deepak Girme, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 16th December 1996 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 5th February 1997. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have come to an end. :10: 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :11: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.31 OF 1997 Nilesh Madhukar Shinde ... Petitioner versus Ramrao Pawar and another ... Respondents ... Mr. R.S. Chitnis, for the Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 30th December 1996 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 17th January 1997. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have come to an end. :12: 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :13: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.48 OF 1997 Gopinath Maruti Gaikwad ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr. A.S. Rao, for the Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 30th December 1996 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 17th January 1997. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have come to an end. :14: 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :15: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.50 OF 1997 Santosh Dattaram Patil ... Petitioner versus B.K.Singh, D.C.P.,Thane & anr. ... Respondents ... Mr. R.S. Chitnis, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 25th October 1996 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 16th January 1997. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have come to an end. :16: 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :17: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.107 OF 1997 Dholya Shankar Hussaini Gaikwad ... Petitioner versus R.S.Khaire, D.C.P.,Thane & anr. ... Respondents ... Mr. Subhash Jha, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 4th October 1996 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 31st January 1997. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have come to an end. :18: 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :19: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.132 OF 1997 Yusuf Ismail Nadaf ... Petitioner versus Asstt.Police Supdt. Karad Division, Karad and others ... Respondents ... Mr. Jaydeep N. Pawar, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 29th March 1996 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 31st January 1997. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have :20: come to an end. 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :21: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.144 OF 1997 Sanjay Haribhau Tarekar ... Petitioner versus Asstt.Police Supdt. Panvel Division, Panvel and others ... Respondents ... Mr. Prashant Badole, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 30th November 1996 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 7th May 1997. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have :22: come to an end. 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :23: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.145 OF 1997 Hemant Hari Patil ... Petitioner versus Asstt.Police Supdt. Panvel Division, Panvel and others ... Respondents ... Mr. Prashant Badole, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 30th November 1996 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 7th May 1997. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have :24: come to an end. 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :25: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.146 OF 1997 Arun Hari Patil ... Petitioner versus Asstt.Police Supdt. Panvel Division, Panvel and others ... Respondents ... Mr. Prashant Badole, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 30th November 1996 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 7th May 1997. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have :26: come to an end. 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :27: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.147 OF 1997 Jayant Sakharam Bhoir ... Petitioner versus Asstt.Police Supdt. Panvel Division, Panvel and others ... Respondents ... Mr. Prashant Badole, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 30th November 1996 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 7th May 1997. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have :28: come to an end. 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :29: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1237 OF 1997 Rajendra @ Sikandar Chokha Suryawanshi ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. ... Respondents ... Mr. Deepak Girme, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 29th August 1997 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 9th December 1997. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued :30: must have come to an end. 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :31: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1276 OF 1997 Laxman Shankar Mane ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr. Deepak Girme, for the Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 29th August 1997 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 16th December 1997. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have come to an end. :32: 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :33: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.23 OF 1998 Chandrakant @ Chandya Devendra Nayak (Naik) ... Petitioner versus Shri Bipin Kumar Singh, D.C.P., Zone-I, Thane & anr. ... Respondents ... Mr. M.S. Mohite, for the Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 26th May 1997 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 29th January 1998. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for :34: which the externment order was issued must have come to an end. 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :35: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1767 OF 1998 Prakash Baburao Bhosale ... Petitioner versus The Deputy Commissioner of Police & anr ... Respondents ... Mr. G.H. Keluskar, for the Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 3rd July 1998 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 30th December 1998. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have :36: come to an end. 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :37: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.21 OF 1999 Nitin @ Bapu Kanhu Kharat ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and ors... Respondents ... Mr. Deepak Girme, for the Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 22nd December 1997 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 5th February 1999. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have come to an end. :38: 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :39: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.616 OF 1999 Vidyadhar Sitaram Malkar ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr. A.S.Khandeparkar, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 30th December 1997 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 5th August 1999. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have come to an end. :40: 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :41: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.683 OF 1999 Rajesh @ Raju Samsing Kandare ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr. A.S.Khandeparkar, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 18th October 1998 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 13th July 1999. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued must have come to an end. :42: 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :43: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1712 OF 1999 Mrs.Nazma Mohmedalli Siddique ... Petitioner versus The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone VIII, Kherwadi & anr. ... Respondents ... Mr. M. Unnikrishnan, for the Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 15th December 1998 by the competent authority against the Petitioner. The Petitioner has suffered externment period partly. This Court, while entertaining the present petition, granted interim relief on 17th December 1999. Due to efflux of time, the purpose for which the externment order was issued :44: must have come to an end. 2. Hence, this petition is disposed of with direction that the remaining period of externment shall not be enforced against the Petitioner. All other questions are left open. This course is adopted in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baby Naaz v. Union of India, reported in 1990 (Supp) S.C.C., 163 (II). 3. Ordered accordingly. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.) :45: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.417 OF 2000 Suresh sing Gayasingh Thakur ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & anr. ...Respondents ... Mr. M.P.Mishra, for the Petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, A.P.P., for the Respondents. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 16th March 2005 P.C.: . This petition takes exception to the externment order passed on 2nd September