1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 6841/2010 Devendra Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 11.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Vijay Singh -for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor IO present in person BY THE COURT: I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a case for the offence under sections 382 and 342 IPC. The petitioner may be granted benefit of anticipatory bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. He submits that that there are previous cases against the petitioner. Hence, he may not be granted bail. 2 After taking into consideration rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, but looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, bail application is dismissed. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma