1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 4542 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 2.8.2010. *** Jagjit Singh Layalpuri & Ors. .. Appellants VS. M/s Unitop Apartments & Builders Ltd. .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR, Present:- Mr. Sumeet Mahajan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocate & Mr. Amit Kohar, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Pardeep Diwan, Advocate and Mr. Vikram Bali, Advocate for the caveator-respondent. ARVIND KUMAR, J. Notice to the caveator-respondent. Mr. Diwan and Mr. Vikram Bali, Advocates accept notice. Heard. There were arbitration proceedings between respondent Unitop Apartments and Builders Ltd and the appellants, wherein Jagjit Singh appellant and others filed a counter claim. The learned arbitrator vide award dated 13.1.2010 dismissed the application of M/s Unitop Apartments and Builders and so as the counter claim. Aggrieved with the said order, M/s Unitop Apartments and Builders Ltd. filed the objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. An application under Section 9 of the Act ibid was also filed seeking a restraint order to the non- applicants from damaging or demolishing or causing any loss to the building existing on the land measuring 14 kanals 3 marlas, which was the subject matter of the arbitration proceedings and also for providing order interim measure for protection of the building thereon. The Court vide order dated 18.3.2010 allowed the application and the non-applicants were 2 restrained from demolishing or damaging or changing the nature of the building described in the head note of the application, till the final decision of the objection application filed under Section 34 of the Act. Hence, this appeal. Any order passed by this Court may prejudice the case of the parties in the pending objection petition. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that expeditious disposal of the pending objections be directed. In view of this, the instant appeal is disposed of with a direction to the Court below to decide the pending objections petition, in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the receipt of certified copy of this order. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE August 2,2010 Jiten