IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2009 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1931 CRP.No. 333 of 2009() --------------------- I.A.NO.3705/07 IN OS.1115/1996 of PRL.M.C.,IRINJALAKUDA .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER/1ST DEFENDANT: --------------------------------------------- VARGHESE, AGED 45 YERS, S/O. CHATTYATH MOODA DEVASSY, KUZHIKATTUSSERY DESOM, THAZHEKAD VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT AND PETITIONERS 2 AND 3/PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS 2 AND 3: ----------------------------------------- 1. DHARMAPRIYA KURISES (P) LTD., IRINJALAKUDA VILLAGE DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, IRINJALAKUDA P.O. THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. RAMAKRISHNAN,S/O. ALANGADAN CHATHAN, IRINJALAKUDA VILLAGE DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. 3. VARGHESE, S/O. KANNAPARAMBIL KOCHAPPAN, IRINJALAKUDA VILLAGE DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. ADV. SRI.T.N.MANOJ FOR R1 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER IN I.A.NO.1326/09 IN C.R.P.333/2009 DISMISSED. 14.12.2009 S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- C.R.P.NO.333 OF 2009 () ----------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of December, 2009 O R D E R Revision is directed against an order passed by the learned Principal Munsiff, Irinjalakkuda, dismissing an application moved by the petitioners/defendants in O.S.No.1115 of 1996 seeking correction of the decree and judgment passed in the suit for limiting the interest at 6% per annum for the principal sum in the place of 12% interest per annum awarded by the court. The above application was moved under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The learned Munsiff, after hearing both sides and considering the relevant materials found no merit in that application and it was dismissed. Perusing the impugned order with reference to the submissions made by the counsel on both sides, I find there is no scope for any interference as the order passed by the learned Musniff is proper, valid and correct. Revision CRP.333/09 2 lacks merit and it is dismissed. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE prp