$5§§§3LE BEMQ§§ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.227.No. 0‘3 0w OF 2010 PETITIONERS 1. {Ganesh Kumar Jagatramka S/o Shri APPLICANTS 2. v Akhilesh Kumar S/o Shri Ganesh Kumar Jagatramka, aged about 38 Banwarilal , aged about 65 years / years Both R/0 Village—Taraimal, Up—Tahsil— Tamnar, Distt. Rajgarh (C.G.). VERSUS f/ . RESPONDENTS 1. Dukalu Behra S/o not known, R/o NON—APPLICANTS village—Taraimal, Up—Tahsil— Tamnar, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). K 2. Nayab Tahsildar, Tamnar, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). 3. Tahsildar, Tamnar, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). 4. {Sub Divisional Officer (R), Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 5. Collector, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ' WRIT PETITION UNDER ‘ ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W,WI WE W 7.5.2010 Shri M.K. Sinha, couns Shri Sanjeev Kuma State/respondm’lts No. 2 to 5. WWW 1 for the petitioners; Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for the aring, this Court had granted time to ndents No. 2 to 5 to seek instructions ar with regard to compliance of order On the last date of h learned counsel for the resp from respondent No.3/Tah’s dated 25. 1 1.2009 passed in W.P.(227) No.6903 of 2009. Learned counsel for the respondents No. 2 to 5 submits that istructions have been received till date. At this stage, learned caunsel for the petitioner submits that as d, respondent No.3/Tahsildar, Tamnar, ndue advantage and not concluding the no time limit has been fixe District- Raigarh is taking u proceedings. Taking into considerat petition is finally disposed ( District—Raigarh/ respondent compliance of the order d W.P.(227) No.6903 of 2009 Within a period of 3 months from the date \ .on the circumstances of the case, this )ff with direction to Tahsildar, Tamnar, No.3 to conclude proceedings in ated 25th November, 2009 passed in §;A)"I 5d J- Manmdra Mohan shruvastava judge q though letter was issued, no i. of receipt of copy of this order. i