IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 15725 of 2008 Between: K.Annapurnamma, W/o. Venkatadri Naidu, R/o. Venkatagiri Village & Mandal, Nellore district. ..... PETITIONER AND The Special Deputy collector(Land Acquisition), Telugu Ganga Project, Rapur at Nellore, Nellore district. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or direction declaring the action of the respondent in not acquiring the land an extent of Ac.2.03 in S.No.113 situated at Sidda Gunta Village, Balayapalli Mandal Nellore District, and not paying the compensation Under the provision of Land Acquisition act, as illegal and arbitray and consequently direct the respondent to acquire the land an extent of Ac.2.03 in S.No.113 situated at Sidda Gunta Village, Balayapalli Mandal and pay the compensation Under the Provisions of Land Acquisition Act, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 15725 of 2008 O R D E R: The petitioner claims to be the owner and possessor of Ac.9.37 cents situated in 113 of Siddagunta village, Balayapalli Mandal, Nellore District. It is stated that the Telugu Ganga channel was laid through the land of the petitioner to an extent of Ac.2.03 cents by acquiring only that part of the land. Consequently, the petitioner is deprived of making use of the rest of the land. In the circumstances, she made a representation dated 19-11-2007 requesting the respondents to acquire the remaining land situated in Sy.No.113 also and pay the appropriate compensation to her under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act,1894. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in considering her request, the present writ petition is filed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, since the representation made by the petitioner dated 19-11-2007 is pending before the respondents, without expressing any opinion on merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner vide her representation dated 19-11-2007 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 22-07-2008 KLP