1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.9787/2008 (Rajendra Singh Versus The State of Rajasthan) Date of Order :: 16th January, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GUMAN SINGH By post Mr. B.K. Sharma, Deputy Government Counsel for the State of Rajasthan Admit. 2. At the request of learned counsel for the State, the case was heard finally and is being disposed of. 3. The petitioner in this writ petition has prayed that earlier he was granted first and second parole and his conduct during that period was satisfactory and after expiry of 11 months, he again applied for third parole, but for the reasons best known to the respondents, his application was not forwarded for consideration. Subsequently he moved another application and contended that although an order has been passed for his release on third parole and he has also furnished the bail bonds, but even after expiry of one and a half month, his release order has not been issued by 2 the office of District Collector, Sikar. He has, therefore, prayed that he be released on third parole and a suitable order be passed for necessary enquiry against the defaulting officer. 4. A notice to show-cause was given and in response thereof the respondents have filed their written-reply to the writ petition, wherein they have admitted that District Parole Advisory Committee has decided to release the petitioner on third parole of 40 days vide order dated 10th June, 2008 and he was informed accordingly. It has further been mentioned that as and when the petitioner will furnish the bail bonds to the competent authority, he will be released on third parole. 5. We have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the State and also the contents of both the applications filed by the petitioner. It appears that petitioner was eligible for release on third parole of 40 days and his application has also been accepted and an order has been passed by the competent authority to release him on parole of 40 days. As per contents of application of the petitioner, he has already furnished the bail bonds, whereas the respondents submitted that 3 as and when he will furnish the bail bonds before the competent authority, the petitioner will be released immediately. 6. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the further controversy, we think it fit and proper to direct the respondents to release the petitioner on third parole of 40 days on his furnishing bail bonds before the Superintendent of the concerned Jail itself. 7. Consequently, the writ petition is allowed. It is directed that petitioner be released on third parole of 40 days immediately on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction to the Superintendent of the concerned Jail. It will be open for the Superintendent of the concerned Jail to impose any other reasonable condition according to Rules. 8. A copy of this order may be sent to the Superintendent of the concerned Jail and also to the convict-petitioner. (GUMAN SINGH), J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK