1 wp193310 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1933 OF 2010 Anthony Vaz ...Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. S.L. Prabhu for the Petitioner Mr. J.P. Yagnik, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE: 25TH NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C.:- This petition for quashing of C.R. No. 5 of 2010 is filed on the assumption that the petitioner is one of the named accused in the said case. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, states that the petitioner has not been named as accused in the said case, but has been asked to attend police station for recording of the statement as witness, and witness summons has been issued to him. If it is so, the question of quashing the F.I.R. at the instance of the petitioner does 2 wp193310 not arise. This petition is, therefore, misconceived. The petitioner, through counsel, undertakes to extend full co-operation to the Investigating Officer for taking the investigation forward and to its logical end. That undertaking is accepted. Petition is disposed of accordingly. A.P. BHANGALE, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.