THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1198 OF 2001 ORDER: 1 The petitioner herein filed a private complaint against the first respondent who is arrayed as accused in the said complaint alleging an offence punishable under section 138 of N.I. Act. The learned IV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad took the same into cognizance as C.C.No.901 of 1999. During the course of trial, the petitioner himself was examined as P.W.1 and he got marked Exs.P.1 to P.14. On behalf of the accused D.Ws.1 to 6 were examined and Exs.D.1 to D.9 were marked. The learned Magistrate taking the entire evidence into consideration came to the conclusion that the accused is guilty of the said offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act, but, however, taking a lenient view, sentenced the accused to pay a fie of Rs.5,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of three months. As against the said judgment dated 17.08.2001, the complainant approached this court and filed the present revision. 2 This revision was admitted by this court on 22.02.2002. As the notices sent by the registry are not served on the first respondent / accused, this court directed the counsel for the petitioner to furnish the correct address of the first respondent and posted the matter to 09.12.2009 by order dated 11.11.2009. In the said order, this court also observed that if the counsel for the petitioner fails to furnish the correct address of the first respondent, this revision stands dismissed against the first respondent. The office endorsement is to the effect that the said conditional order has not been complied with. 3 Hence this revision against the first respondent is already dismissed and it remains only against the second respondent i.e. the State against which no relief can be granted because it is an offence punishable under section 138 of N.I. Act. 4 Accordingly, this revision is dismissed. --------------- 08.07.2010 Kvsn