IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.32498 OF 2011 1.MD. JASHIM @ MD. JASIM ALAM, S/O NAIMUL. 2.NOOR HODA @ NURUL HODA, S/O MD. JASIR, BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE BARA TOLE, POLICE STATION SAHARGHAT, DISTRICT MADHUBANI. …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR. ………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES. ---------- 02/ 24.10.2011 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with the offences punishable under Section 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504/34 I.P.C and other allied offences of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no specific allegation of over act against the petitioners and they are only said to have been armed with gandasa whereas others including Manzoor Alam, who is said to have given gandasa blow on the head of the informant and one Md. Manzar Alam had been granted anticipatory bail by an order dated 15.10.2011, passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 32500 of 2011. He further submits that the petitioner has 2 got no criminal antecedent (paragraph no. 15) and the whole occurrence has been blown out of the portion on account of serious land dispute between the parties. Considering the aforesaid aspect, this Court would direct petitioners namely Md. Jashim @ Md. Jasim Alam and Noor Hoda @ Nurul Hoda to surrender within a period of four weeks from today and if they do so, they would be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties each of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Saharghat P. S case No. 41 of 2011 subject to the conditions laid down under Section- 438 (2) Cr. P.C and also subject to the following three conditions:- (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioners will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and their absence even for a single day would automatically entail the 3 consequences of cancellation of their bail. (iii) The petitioners, in case, are now made accused in any other criminal case, that would itself lead to cancellation of their bail. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)