’gg HIGH CGERT Q}? CHHA‘E‘TISGARH AT "BILASPUR WRIT 1’E’l‘l'i‘ION No ’?743 of 2004 PETI’I‘IGNER ; Virench‘a Kumar Paithak S/o Late Sim S‘Nfathak, Aged abaut 46 years, R/O {)arripara; Ambikapur (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENFS : 1. State 0f Chhaitisgarh, ’l‘hmugja Secrgtm'y Dwamnmt of Transpeii, D.K.S. Bilawan, . Raipur (CIR) State Transport Authoriiy Raimn‘ (CG) . Ani1 Duggai Bus Operator Kharsia Road, Ambikapxsr (CG‘) 4. Regiona1 ’I'ransport Authority Bilaspur {c.G.) WRIT PEm‘KyN UNDER AR'i‘ICLE 226 OF THE CGN STrmriwN 01: 1ND‘iA SB: Haii’bEe Shri SatiSh K. Agiiikatri, J. W5) Present: Shri 'Vivek Vanna. Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shaehmlk Thakur, Pane} uiwyer fer the State/respenéents 1, ’2 and 4” Shri BRGuptm Advocate for the respondent No. 3. ORAL URI)E§(' {Passed onmEéa§ day of Agglst, 2098) Leamed couglsel appearing for the petitioner submits, that the permit (iated 23.6.2003 granted by the State 'I‘ransport Authorityt Rajpur for a period of five years has come to an end. Thereaiter, a fresh permit. has also been this hae become inituctuous. grante&. Thus, petition 2. Learned counsel appearing for the getitioner, on instructions, seeks pennission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to chailenge the new ,permit, if a new cause of action arises. Leameci counsel appearing for the other side have no objeotion. 3. Aocordingly, the petition is dismissed as ‘tvithdrawn with the above statecl iibeity. No order asto costs. 4. Consequemly, M(W)P No. 2420/2004, aiso stands dismissed. / i 1 Sd/— ‘ Satish K. Agnihotri Arm ‘ i Judge