m P.(S) No. 1438 of Ctevkumari Sharma, E)/o. Siri Rajkumar Siarma, cge about 38 years, Working as Assistant Teacher, 6ovt. Primary School - Andhari Itochar, Distt.- Korba (C.©.) Versus 1. £.. State of Chhattisgarh Through The 5ecretary bepartment of School Education &.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (C.©.) The District Education Offscer, Distt. - Bilaspur (c.e.) 3. Assistant Commissioner, Triba! We!fare Department Korba (C.6.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block-Korba, totala Katghora Disn.-Kor'ba (C.©.) SB; Hon'bSe Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present; Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for the petitloner. AAr. Vinay Pandey, Panel Lawyer- for respondents/State. (.',- OR D ER (Passed on this 13th bay of March, 2007) 1. The petitioner was appointed vide order dated 09.01.1989 (Annexure P/l) as Assistant Teacher on fixed poy scale of Rs.300/-. After completion of one year probation, he was granted regular pay scale. 2. Learned counsel oppearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether, the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initinl appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & others), wherein it wcis held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initiaf appointment. The matter was taken-up to the Hon'bte Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Sjpreme Court upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular poy scate from date of initial appointment. 4. Learned counsel oppearing for the petitioner further submits that this Court, wrfiile considering the sarKe issue in Sjshil Tiwari & others Vs. State (5ovt. of Chhattisgarh & others (W.P. (5) No. 5976 of 2006) by order dated 7-11-2006, has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial oppointment. _. ~ --- r '^ 5. L^arned counsel appearing for,the parties jointty submit that this cxs.sa \s squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Sushit Tiwari i& others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & others (Supra). 6. In view of that this petition is allovwd in the same terms. No order 'i^s^osh as to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge