IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 4TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 13TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 26790 of 2008(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ KUREIN P.J. S/O.JOSEPH, AGED 62 YEARS, PULINTHANATHU HOUSE MANJAKKAD, CHERUPUZHA, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND DEPUTY COLLECTOR, (GENERAL) KANNUR DISTRICT. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER K.S.E.B,ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION VELLOOR, KANDOTH P.O.,KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. P.MOHANDAS PUNNAMMOOTTIL HOUSE,MANJAKKAD CHERUPUZHA, KANNUR DISTRICT. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI BIJOY CHANDRAN R2 BY SC SRI P.P.THAJUDEEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) 26790 of 2008 -------------------------------------------------------- Dated: SEPTEMBER 4, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that on an application filed by the 3rd respondent for electricity connection, when the petitioner offered obstruction to the drawal of the line, 2nd respondent moved the 1st respondent praying for removing the obstruction. It is stated that he was issued Ext.P2 notice and that though he appeared before the 1st respondent, he could not file his written submissions. Subsequently he filed Ext.P3, his written objection, and according to him, he has not heard anything further in the matter. Petitioner now apprehends that the 1st respondent will pass orders on the application made by the 2nd respondent ignoring Ext.P3 objection for the reason that it was filed belatedly. 2. If, as stated by the petitioner, final orders have not been passed so far, it is only fair that the petitioner's WP(C) 26790/2008 2 written objection is also taken note of while orders are passed. 3. Therefore I dispose of this writ petition directing that, if final order has not so far been passed, the 1st respondent shall pass final orders on the application filed by the 2nd respondent for removing the obstruction, taking note of Ext.P3 objection, if it is received and is pending. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-