IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9777 of 2008 Amrendra Kumar Singh, son of Shri Indrajeet Prasad Singh, resident of village & P.O. Mukrera, Police Station Revilganj, District Saran (Chapra), at present posted and working as a Panchayat Teacher in Govt. Primary School Charwa, Anchal Ekma-2, District Saran (Chapra)……………………………..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra. 5. The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Establishment Committee, Saran at Chapra. 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Saran at Chapra. 7. The Block Development Officer, Ekma, District Saran. 8. The Block Education Extension Officer, Ekma-2, District Saran. 9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Nawada, Block- Ekma, District Saran. 10. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Nawada, Block Ekma, District Saran. 11. The Headmaster-cum-Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Govt. Primary School Charwa, Anchal Ekma-2, District Saran…………………………………………Respondents ----------- 2 29.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now in the light of the judgment of this Court in the case of Ranjeet Kumar Versus The State of Bihar reported in 2007 (3)PLJR 746 and subsequent decision of the Government contained in Memo No.3335 dated 2 9.9.2008, petitioner has to be treated as validly appointed Panchayat Teacher. He submits that though petitioner has continued in service but his salary has not been paid in view of the earlier decision of the Government dated 30.04.2007. In the circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will file a representation before the concerned authority enclosing a copy of the said judgment and the said policy decision for release of arrears of salary and payment of current salary. In the circumstances, without going into merit of the claim of the petitioner, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation within one month from today. If such a representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered by the authority concerned and appropriate orders shall be passed preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of the representation. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)