IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 12TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 23RD MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 4640 of 2009(B) ------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- K.BHASKARAN , S/O.KRISHNAN, KILIVAYIL HOUSE, IRINGALLOOR P.O, VENGARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY MR.SAJU J.VALLYARA, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. MRS.VASANTHA, LAKSHMI SADAN, VILAKKAD, IRITTY P.O, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY MR. P.N. SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.4640 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 12th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner submits that the 2nd respondent has applied for revision of timings. On coming to know of the same, according to the petitioner, he has filed Ext.P1 objection before the 1st respondent. It is stated that the timing conference is schedule to be held on 20/02/2009, and what the petitioner seeks is a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P1 objection also. 2. Having regard to the above limited nature of the relief that is sought for, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P1 objection also, as and when the request of revision of timings made by the 2nd respondent is taken up for consideration. 3. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg