1 (Appa 915 of 2010 in cri. Appeal 1202 of 2007) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 915 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1202 OF 2007 Mrs. Meeta Malik ...Applicant Vs. Lalit Jain and Anr. …Respondents ----- Ms. Vidhya Mangavde for Applicant Mrs. M.R.Tidake-APP for the State ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED:26TH NOVEMBER, 2010 P.C. 1. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant submits that in the impugned order, it is incorrectly mentioned that on 23rd March, 2010, neither Appellant nor his counsel was present. 2 In support of the said submission she has annexed the board of 23.2.2010. The Roznama indicates that in fact on 23rd March, 2010, the following order was passed: “None for the Appellant. Mrs. M.R. Tidake -APP for the State. To be placed for final hearing on 2 (Appa 915 of 2010 in cri. Appeal 1202 of 2007) 14.6.2010”. 3. The learned counsel for the Applicant tendered the apology for not examining the record before mentioning the statement on oath. 4. Explanation is accepted. For the reasons stated in paragraph 7, the order dated 14th June, 2010 is recalled. Criminal Appeal is restored to the file. 5. Criminal Application for restoration is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE J.)