The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.24470 of 2010 Date: 01-10-2010 Between: K.Chandraiah and another ..... Petitioners AND The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and 3 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Mr.P.Venugopala Rao Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue Order: Order, dated 27-04-2007, passed by respondent No.2, refusing the petitioner’s request to amend the entries in the record of rights in respect of Ac.10-08 guntas of land comprised in Survey No.51 of Chendippa Village, which was the subject matter of OS.No.17 of 1989, on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Vikarabad, and Order, dated 16-11-2009, passed by respondent No.1, confirming the said order by dismissing the petitioners’ appeal, are assailed in the present Writ Petition. At the hearing, Sri P.Venugopala Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioners, has not disputed that the orders, impugned in this Writ Petition, are amenable to revisional jurisdiction of the Collector under Section 9 of the Andhra Pradesh Record of Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (for short ‘the Act’), and that his clients have not availed the said remedy. In my opinion, when there is an efficacious statutory remedy of revision available to the petitioners, they ought to have availed the same instead of invoking this Court’s jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Ordinarily, this Court does not entertain the Writ Petitions, filed bypassing the effective alternative remedy. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed, without going into the merits of the case, with liberty to the petitioners to avail the above-mentioned remedy. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.31326 of 2010, filed by the petitioners for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 1st October, 2010 lur