IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 1947 of 2011. Decided on: April 5, 2011. Vikas Pathania Versus State of H.P. & others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl.AG and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG for respondents No. 1 to 3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is a teacher appointed on PTA basis. He is aggrieved since the fourth respondent has been appointed in his place on regular basis. According to the petitioner, the fourth respondent can be accommodated, without any disturbance to him, in the nearby school, where there is a vacancy. The petitioner may obtain the willingness of the fourth respondent and produce the same before the second respondent, in which case, the second respondent will take steps to accommodate the fourth respondent in the vacancy as pointed out by the petitioner, if available and in the resultant vacancy in case the petitioner is otherwise eligible and entitled, he may be engaged as PTA teacher, till he is replaced by a regular recruitee. The needful action in this regard shall be taken within a period of two weeks from the date of production of copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition, by the petitioner before the second respondent. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. April 5, 2011. ( Justice Sanjay Karol ), (karan/vs) Judge. 2