1 S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1/2009. Hukam Chand. VS Kamlesh Kumar & Anr. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1/2009. Hukam Chand. VERSUS Kamlesh Kumar and Another. 11.05.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.R.K.Agarwal, for the petitioner. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned judgment dated 16.09.2008 by which the suit filed by the petitioner-plaintiff under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act has been dismissed. While it is true that the learned trial court has decided the issue No.1 of title, which is not required to be seen in the suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act but the fact remains that the issue No.2 for prior possession of the plaintiff and the fact of his being dispossessed from the date alleged has not been proved by the plaintiff before the learned trial court and accordingly, the learned trial court on the basis of the finding on issue No.2 against the plaintiff- petitioners has dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiffs. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the learned trial court has not appreciated the findings in the correct manner and there is perversity in the judgment of the learned trial court. 2 S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1/2009. Hukam Chand. VS Kamlesh Kumar & Anr. I am of the view that in the revisional jurisdiction, this court cannot re-appreciate the finding of fact with regard to the issue No.2 regarding dispossession. Be that as it may, the plaintiff is not remediless and the plaintiff has a remedy of filing regular suit based upon title. In view of the above, the revision petition is accordingly dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.