IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47799 of 2008 BIKARAM CHAUDHARY@ BIKRAM CHAUDHARY … … Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … … Opp. Party For the petitioner: Shri Sanjeev Kr-1 For the State:Shri Dashrath Mehta, APP ----------- 2. 4.12.2008 Heard. The case is under Sections 364 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. A lady Indu Devi, wife of Balairam Chaudhary, developed relationship with the petitioner. The bond was so deep that the lady abandoned her husband and started living with the petitioner. The relationship was not liked by the father of Baliram Chaudhary or the father-in-law of the lady. It is true that the father-in-law was abducted and killed by this petitioner. Baliram chaudhary was also alleged to be abducted and killed and the circumstance or the complicity is that the lady again started living with this petitioner. Having gone through rejection order I find that there is absolutely no material indicating that it could be the petitioner who could have committed the 2 offence. Whatever is recorded is merely suspicion on account of the circumstance due to the lady’s company. Let the petitioner Bikaram Chaudhary alias Bikram Chaudhary be released on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran,Bettiah, in Bettiah Mufassil( Manuwapool) P.S.Casde No. 55 of 2008. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)