IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.7066 of 2001 Between: 1 G.radhika Poonam W/o. A.V.Srisailam C/o. G.Narayana, Atkarpet, Sadashivpet, Medak District. 2 A.V.Srisailam S/o. late Venkataiah C/o. G.Narayana, Atkarpet, Sadashivpet, Medak District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Superintendent of Police, Medak District, Medak. 2 The Inspector of Police, Sadashivpet, Medak District. 3 The Inspector of Police, Bollaram Police Station, Bollaram, R.R.District. 4 P.N.Chandrasekhar S/o.P.Narasimha R/o.H.No.248/B, Convent Lane, Doveton Bazar, Bollaram. 5 P.N.Srinivas S/o.P.Narsimha R/o.H.No.248/B, Convent Lane, Doveton Bazar, Bollaram. 6 P.N.Narender S/o.P.Narsimha R/o.H.No.248/B, Convent Lane, Doveton Bazar, Bollaram. 7 G.B.Bhoomaiah S/oBalaiah R/o.H.No.248/B, Convent Lane, Doveton Bazar, Bollaram. 8 G.B.Meera W/o.Bhoomaiah R/o.H.No.248/B, Convent Lane, Doveton Bazar, Bollaram. 9 G.B.Arvind Kiran Kumar S/o.Bhoomaiah R/o.H.No.248/B, Convent Lane, Doveton Bazar, Bollaram. 10 G.Sharadha W/o.Eswaraiah R/o.H.No.248/B, Convent Lane, Doveton Bazar, Bollaram. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus of any other appropriate writ or order or direction in the nature of a writ declaring the action of the respondents in depriving us of our life and liberty and freedom of movement as illegal and violative of Art. 19(1) (d),(e) and Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 herein to provide security for our live. Counsel for the Petitioner:MISS.M.KIRANMAYEE Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.7066 of 2001 ORDER: Petitioners seek to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in depriving their life, liberty and freedom of movement as illegal and arbitrary. This court while admitting the writ petition on 16-04-2001, granted interim direction to the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners in discharge of their official and professional duties, pending disposal of the writ petition. In view of the interim order passed on 16-04-2001, no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition. However, without there being any case registered against the petitioners, the question of interfering with the petitioners’ life and liberty does not arise. If there is any complaint filed against the petitioners, it is always open for the respondents to register a case against the petitioners and take appropriate action in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 02-04-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MADHURI}