( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2887 OF 2010 Smt. Jebunnisabi Latifbeg Mirza and another. PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. S.S. Patil, advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. for the respondents. ..... [CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ.] [DATE : 7th April, 2010] PER COURT : 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioner are claiming appointment on compassionate ground. According to us, the petitioners have adequate remedy of filing appropriate application before the Administrative Tribunal at Aurangabad. In fact, learned A.G.P. has raised categorical objection in this behalf. In that light of the matter, we dismiss the petition relegating ( 2 ) the petitioners to avail the remedy available in law. In the event the question of limitation arises, the Tribunal shall take into consideration the period of pendency of this petition from 24th February, 2010 till today. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA ] [ P.V. HARDAS ] JUDGE JUDGE NPJ/wp2887-10