1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13 OF 2010 Smt.Priya Manishkumarji Karnavat ..Appellant V/s. Shri Manishkumarji Anilkumarji ..Respondent Karnavat & ors Mr.Prathamesh Bhargude, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.Neel M. Pungaliya, Advocate, for the Respondents CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 25TH JUNE, 2010 P.C. . This is an Application for transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No.62 of 2009 pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Palghar to the family Court at Pune. Notice was issued to the Respondents, who are represented by Advocate Neel M. Pungaliya. I have heard both the learned Counsel for the parties. Though the learned Counsel for the Respondents has strong objection since the Respondents would have to appear before the Court at Pune in proceedings initiated by the 2 Applicant under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. H.M.P.No.62 of 2009 pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Palghar is transferred to the family Court at Pune. The learned Counsel for the Respondents submits that the Respondents could be harassed by being required to attend Court at Pune on different dates since he would have been required to attend even the Court at Palghar by leaving his native place, his apprehension could be set at rest by directing that the family Court at Pune and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pune shall ensure that the proceedings before them between the parties are heard preferably on the same date in the morning and afternoon session so as to minimise convenience to the parties. 2. Miscellaneous Civil Application is allowed in above terms. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.) 3