1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1846 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra through Police Inspector Mohadi Police Station, Dhule .. Applicant ( Orig.Complainant) Versus Kashinath Bhimsha Kote .. Respondent Mr.N.R.Shaikh, A.P.P. for applicant-State Mr.Manoj Shinde, Advocate holding for Mr.N.P.Patil Jamalpurkar, Advocate for respondent-sole CORAM : P.V. HARDAS, J. DATE : 23rd September 2010 PER COURT : 1. This is an application challenging the order passed by the Ist Ad- hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule dated 24.5.2006, in Criminal Application No.222 of 2006 directing the release of the applicant on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.52 of 2006. 2. It appears that an offence came to be registered under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code against the respondent herein. The respondent herein had filed the aforesaid criminal application seeking his release on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest. The trial Court at paragraph 3 has concluded that there was no evidence in respect of direct involvement of the respondent herein in the said crime. For the reasons which are ascribed at paragraph 3 of the order, trial Court directed the release. 2 3. I have heard learned Assistant Public Prosecutor Mr.Shaikh and with whose assistance I have perused the findings recorded by the trial Court. I do not find any case being made out by the applicant for interference in the order passed by the trial Court. Moreover, practically for 4 ½ years have elapsed since the passing of the order granting anticipatory bail to the respondent. In that light of the matter, there being no merit in the application, the application is summarily dismissed. ( P.V. HARDAS, J.) (vvr/1846.06criappln)