6^ HI©HCOURT OF CHHATTIS^RH AT BILASPUR Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice S.R^Nayak, Chief Justice PETETIONER RE5PON&ENT5 Writ Petitlon NQ.3533/2005 Ku. Priyanka Sinha, D/o RXSinha a^ed about 14 years, R/o- 27 Kholi, Bitaspur, District Biiaspur (C.6.) Through naturai guardian (father) R.K^Sinha, S/o ^N.Sinha, aged about 48 years, R/o 27 Khoii, Biiaspur, Oist. Biiaspur (C.G.) Versus 1, State of Chhattisgarh, Through the 5ecretary, Department of Education, D.K-S.Bhawan, ftaipur (C.^.) 2. C.S.Board of Secondary Education, Through the Secretary/ Pension Bada, Raipur, District Raipur (C.&) 3. The District Education Officer, Bifaspur, District Bitaspur (C.e.) 4. The Princjpai, St Francis Higher Secondary School, Ameri Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.&,) Shri Parag Kotecha, Counse! for the petitioner. Shri Utkarsh Verma/Dy< 6A. for the State/respondents No.l &3. Shri J,K.5upta, counsel for the respondent No.2. Shri Neeraj Choubey, Counsel for the respondent No,4. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 24.2.2006) This writ petition isljable to be dismlssed in limine for the simple reason that the reJief sought in 1+iis writ petition is essentialiy o>9<a»nstth& 4 respondent-private schooS moria9em®ntand not a9asnst any public authority. Though in paragraphs 7.1,7.2, and 7.3 a direction is sou9ht ayainst 3 respondent-Tne Distriet Edueation Officer aSso, tl^e petriiori&r has not trae&dl the. obi^ation of the 3r'cl respondent to comply wlth those directions. Th& 3 re^ondent is an educationai -a- ^- ^b authority of the Department of Education of the Stste of Chhattisgarh* Admitted!y, the petitioner studied in CoIoneFs Academy and completed her eighth chss education. She spught &drttiss:t0n to th& 4th respondent's school which \s QiQam a privat® schoot. In order to reguhrize her admission into ninth standard in the 4+ respond&nt's school, the Principal of the 4+ respondent's schoot a notlce to the petitioner's father directing that slnce the petitioner eighth examination through the Central Board of Secondary Education (C.B*S,E.), she is requlred to get the transfer certificate and mark-sheet countersigned by the C,B.S,& The r'&ised by the 4th respondent's schooS, admittedly, is not yet compiied ' by the petitio.ner, The directions. are sought against the No3 &4 to and regubrize the adrnission into the 4 respondent's sehool on th& ground that ac;cordin9 to the of Ccjoners Schoo!, counter signature from the C.B.S.E on the transfer certificate and mark-sheet is not necessar/, It is 'strange indeed* The oplnion of th©management -of Colonel's. Academy School wouid not bihd the 4+ respondent's schooi. B®that &s it moy, the demo>nd mo^de. by the 4th r&spondent's schoot to get the transfer certificate and mark-sheet counter" by the C,B,S.& cou!d not be condemned as soinething perverse particularly/ because, the petitioner admitted!y studied in the CobneS's Academy and passed eighth standard examination and that school is affiSiated to C.B.S.E. Th©obligation of th©3rd respondent or any other State Authorl^ In the Education Department to approve the, admtSsion of the petitioner into 4 respondent's school is not out with reference to any law or statutory rujes. The State of Chhattisgarh, Educationa! Authorities of the State of Chhattisgarh, C.G. of Education District Education Officer are as party-respondents.. .None of have 3> ^>- ^f ^^ any action the petitioner nor.any directlon be issued to respondents No.i to 3 to perform any obtigation. 2. Jhc is No Sd/- Chief Justice >--