IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5059 of 2009 MAHIMA KUMARI, DAUGHTER OF LATE NEELAM SINHA, RESIDING AT C/O SHRI AMAR KUMAR SHARMA, MOHALLA – VIKAS NAGAR, SHARLEY DIPU GARHA, P.S. – HAZARIBAGH, DISTRICT - HAZARIBAGH Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION) HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, LAKHISARAI 6. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, LAKHISARAI-CUM-MUNGER. 7. THE PRINCIPAL, PRIMARY TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, LAKHISARAI. 8. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, LAKHISARAI. 9. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 7. 10.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of retiral dues of her mother. Interlocutory application No. 4527 of 2009 has been filed on behalf of one Bharti Sinha stating with regard to claims over the retiral dues, copy of which has been served to the other side. Having considered the interlocutory application and the submission of the parties, the interlocutory application is allowed and the said Bharti Sinha is allowed to intervene in the matter. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner as also the counsel appearing for the intervener submits that on perusal of the Annexure- 7, relating to the group insurance, it would appear that all the four daughters of the deceased employee including the petitioner and the intervener have been nominated to receive the proceeds of the insurance to the extent of ¼ th share. Learned counsel further submits that so far the payment of the proceeds of the provident fund dues is concerned the payment should be made as per the nomination of the deceased employee. Learned counsel for the State submits that so far as the retiral dues covered under the nomination is concerned, the same shall be considered without delay. However, so far other claims are concerned, in case petitioner represents the department, the same also be considered separately. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of all the pending claims, the petitioner proposes to file two separate representations; one for claims relating to group insurance and the other for G.P.F. amount as per the nomination and other claims with regard to the settlement of the other outstanding claims within a period of four weeks from today. In 3 case such representations are filed, the same shall be considered in accordance with law without delay expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the admitted dues on account of the group insurance and G.P.F. could be settled without delay. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)