IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3946 of 2006 1. Sheo Pujan Singh 2. Shyam Bihari Singh 3. Shiv Bachan Singh 4. Shiv Lochan Singh, petitioner nos. 1 to 4 are sons of Late Bibhuti Singh 5. Khichadu Singh son of Sheo Bachan Singh 6. Indradeo Singh Son of Late Kuer Singh 7. Ram Nagina Singh son of Sri Indradeo Singh 8. Sri Bhagwan Singh son of Sri Indradeo Singh 9. Ram Bilash Singh, Sons of Sri Indradeo Singh 10. Markandey Singh Son of Late Mangal Singh 11. Rajbansh Singh son of Markandey Singh 12. Dayashankar Singh @ Daya Singh Son of Markandey Singh, All residents of village Labedahan, P.O. Deohalia, P.S. Ramgarh, District Kaimur (Bhabhua) … …..Defendants… Respondents .. Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Collector Kaimur (Bhabhua) 3. Ghurahu Sah Son of Late Barhu Sah, R/o village Masarhi, P.S. Ramgarh, P.O. Deohalia, , District Kaimur (Bhabhua) … Plaintiff ….. Appellants…….. Respondents For the Petitioners :M/s Mahesh Prasad & Rewati Kant Raman, Advocates For the State :Mr. M. Nath Roy, A.C. to S.C. 25 02/ 25.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 21.11.2005, passed by the Additional District and Sessions judge, F.T.C. V, Bhabhua, Kaimur in Misc. Appeal No. 26 of 2001, whereunder order dated 12.10.2001 passed by the Munsif, Bhabhua refusing the prayer of the plaintiff for - 2 - grant of injunction has been set aside granting injunction in favour of the plaintiff. The appellate court relying on the orders of the Revenue Authorities has passed the interim injunction order in favour of the plaintiff. 3. Learned counsel for the defendant-petitioners submitted that during the pendency of this writ petition, petitioners have been dispossessed from the lands in question in the light of the notice dated 13.4.2006, Annexure-5 to I.A. No. 3472 of 2006. It is further submitted that injunction order having been passed relying on the orders of the revenue authorities ignoring the provisions of Section 4A of the Consolidation Act, the same is fit to be set aside. 4. I regret not to accept such submission in view of the fact that court below having considered the case of the parties found prima facie case and balance of convenience in favour of the plaintiff and granted injunction. The suit having been filed in the year 2001 about 10 years have passed. In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to direct the trial court to proceed with the title suit and dispose of the same at the earliest in any case within six months from - 3 - the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order taking into account the provisions of the Consolidation and other Act(s). The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)