IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 2989 of 2008 Between: Soghra College of Teacher Education Chithapally(V&M) Devarakonda,Nalgonda Dist Rep.by its Correspondent & Sectretary Sri M.A Khaeel S/o.M.A Khadar R/o.Miryalagonda Nalgonda Dist ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt.Of A.P rep.by its Secretariat Buildings,Hyd 2 The Commissioner & Director of School Education Govt.Of A.P,Saifabad,Hyd 3 The A.p.State Council of Higher Education, Rep.by its Opp.Mahavir Hospital Masab Tank Hyd 4 Osmania University,Tarnaka Hyderabad Rep.by its Registrar .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the impugned proceedings vide Lr.No.APSCHE/CETS/EDCET-06/MGt /2006-07/OU-344 dt.02-08-2007 as illegal, arbitrary violative of Article 14,21 of the constitution of India and in gross violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.A.K.MYNUDDIN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER This writ petition has been filed by Soghra College of Teacher Education with a prayer to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the A.P. State Council of Higher Education-3rd respondent in issuing the proceedings vide Lr.No.APSCHE/CETS/EDCET- 06/Mgt.Quota/2006-07/OU-344 dated 2.8.2007 as arbitrary and illegal. Under Lr.No.APSCHE/CETS/EDCET-06/Mgt.Quota/2006- 07/OU-344 dated 2.8.2007, the A.P. State Council of Higher Education-3rd respondent while approving the admission of 14 candidates pointed out certain deficiencies in the admission of six candidates under 20% management quota. Both the learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by a Judgment dated 24.06.2008 of Division Bench of this Court in WA No.56 of 2008 (Hazarat Ameeruddin College of Education Giddalur Vs.The Government of A.P. and three others) wherein G.O.Rt.No.295, dated 30.04.2008 fell for consideration and the benefit of the said G.O. is extended to the admissions made by the institutions under 20% management quota also. The issue involved in this writ petition is also with regard to admission of the students under 20% management quota. In view of Judgment of Division Bench of this Court, the benefit of GO RT No.295 dated 30.4.2008 is also to be extended to the students admitted by the petitioner- College under 20% management quota. Accordingly, under the said GO certain amount of penalty is required to be paid for approval of admission of the candidates. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of and the petitioner is directed to pay the penalty as per G.O.RT.No.295, dated 30.4.2008 and on such penalty, the 4th respondent-University has to declare the results of students of the petitioner-College. No costs. __________ 08-07-2008 rkk