IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REVISION No.606 of 2008 RAHUL KUMAR PAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 03.07.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 395 of the Penal Code registered in connection with snatching of a motorcycle. He is named in the First Information Report along with others. It is submitted on his behalf that others after being declared as juvenile were admitted to the privilege of bail by the court below itself. Petitioner has also been declared juvenile under order dated 9.12.2007 but his prayer for bail was refused. Let the court below verify the fact that others named in the First Information Report and declared juvenile by the Juvenile Justice Board have been released on bail and if that is correct and there is nothing to distinguish the case of the petitioner with those who have been released on bail, petitioner, namely, Rahul Kumar Pal also be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Gayghat, Patna in connection with J.J.B. Case No. 294 of 2007. Both the order dated 23.4.2008 passed by Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Patna in J.J.B. Case No. 294 of 2007, arising out of Khagaul P.S.Case No. 92 of 2007 as also the appellate order dated 12.5.2008 passed by Sessions Judge, Patna in Criminal Appeal No. 137 of 2008 are, accordingly, set aside. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.) - 2 -