1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 6226/2010 Pappu Ram Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 13.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Kapil Gupta - for the petitioner Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits petitioner was at the age of 10 years when land was originally sold by his mother to Buddhilal and he was not knowing about sale of the land in question thus, bona fidely, sold the land to others. Hence, petitioner may be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. He submits that land in question was sold to Buddhilal in the year 1983 and petitioner was knowing this fact. Bona fide of the petitioner would have come out if he had returned the money to the complainant, however, no such conduct exists thus petitioner is not entitled for grant of bail. 2 After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, bail application is dismissed. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma