^^••^ "?»<.'.^r c^ • s-'^Gr IN THE mGHCOC^TOF CHHATHSGARH AT BO-ASPUR W.S.NO^'^^ /•2SO(»(S.S.) SCTviceMsaBer ^ ffiimONER ^.y-""... ...^^ ^-"^y^^" ^'^ -^-y" .t<r'' / Shaaeadra Tandmi, S/o. Shri Chyal Prasad Tandutt Occi^ion- Patwari^ Aged al»ut 33 years WoTsfflo&es Dist.BiIaspur.C.G. VKtSUS RESTONDENTS : ^ 1. StateofChhattisgaA Throu^iSecretaay Dqitt. ofRevaiue, Mmttalay D.K.S. Bhawaa, Raipur(C.G.) / 2. Additionrf commissioBer Tbtaa^b- CtMntaissioner Laiul tecordChhattisgaA RaqHar (C.G.) / 3. CoUector Bilaspur Kst. Btlaqna- (C.G.) 4. S.D.O. Bflaspwr (C.G.) WRIT reiTHON UNDER AR11CLE 226^227 W TOE -co»ifiiamtrEa'ftUffi_BfflMA- XI-HC-78 3n^r^rR-ii+ cIW3n^?TshK v^ <iSToi Roshan/- *11*1WI Sft*4|ch 3:S?'<11<<1<-|4|, BTflu'IS, fs|rtl<Hy< ^.\4P..^A^.. ^ 200 3T(^?T 'raW (^d(^^iT) ?TcfRK Tif^r sn^r 25.7^006 Heard Mrs. Renu Kochar, Miss Deepali Pandey, Panel| By the instant petition, the| 30.6.2006 (Annexure P-1) wheretjy Bilaspur to Patwarl Halka No. 19. The main grievance ofthe| month of February, 2006 vide Gadwat, District Bilaspur to Patwari) that order could be imptemented wi( order dated 15.2.2006 (Annexure PatwariHalkaNo.19. In the circumstances, learn^d petitioner may be allowed to make and in tum, respondent No.1 be dir^c law, to wliich learned counsel for th^ Having lieard learned ooun^t facts and circumstances of the cas^, of the case, the petitioner is allowecj his grievances to respondent No.1 this petitlon and in tum, respondent] of tlie petitioner within a period d/1 representation after considering al| accordance with law, till then the elTei 30.6.2006 (Annexure P-1) in respec^ With the directton aforesaid, Consequently, M.(W.)P. No,| Certified copy as per rules. 'hl'siffl'fl'f 1|t«']Tffte^l'<Fi]+dl< ^sri^rsn^r Acjvocate for the petitioner. pawyer for the State. petitioner has questioned the order dated he has been transferred from Gadwat, [petitioner is that prior to this order, in the Ann^xure P-2 the petitioner was transferred from [Halka No. 20, Lingadih, Bilaspur and before thout making modification or alteration in the P-2) the petltioner has been transferred to counsel for the petitioner submlts that the ^ detailed representation to respondent No.1 dirfected to decide the same in accordance with State has no objection. i^el for the parties and having regard to the without expressing any opinion on the merit to make a detailed representation raising all ^ithin ten days from today along with copy of INo.1 is directed to decide the representation 1/f 30 days from the date of receipt of the the grievances raised by the petitioner in elfect & operation of the impugned order dated of the petitioner shall remain stayed. the petition stands disposed of. 12853/06 also stands disposed of' - S .:. t_.C. Bi'®ff80 Judgt: P.T.O.