THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.52 of 2008 Dated 19th July, 2011 Between: Kalamata Ganapathi Naidu …Petitioner And The Tahsildar, Mandal Revenue Office, Veeraghattam, Srikakulam District and 2 others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri B.M.Patro Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP for Irrigation & CAD Counsel for respondent No.5: Sri B.K.Ramesh Babu Counsel for respondent Nos.3 & 4: ----- The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly, a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to proceed with the election to the T.C.No.4 of Veeraghattam water Users Association by preparing new voters list including the name of the petitioner after considering the genuine objections / claim of the petitioner.” Sri B.M.Patro, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WVMP.No.2056 of 2008 in/& WPMP.No.53 of 2008 are disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Dated 19th July, 2011 lur