IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.932 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision: 24.05.2011 Ranpat …..Appellant versus State of Haryana and others ……Respondents CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr.Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) This appeal has been filed against an order dated 8.4.2011, vide which, CWP No.6315 of 2011, filed by the appellant, was dismissed by the learned Single Judge. Dispute herein is with regard to providing a passage to the land owned by respondent Nos.3 and 4. The private respondents filed an application under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 (in short, the Act), wherein it was stated that they are the owners of land falling in Khasra No.100//17, 18, 23, 24, 105//4, 7/1 and to their parcel of land, no passage was provided at the time of consolidation proceedings. That application was heard by the Commissioner, exercising the powers of Director under the Act and virtually on concession given by the appellant, the order was passed and two karam passage was provided to the land of the private respondents through the land owned by the appellants in khasra No.100//22 and an equal amount of land was given to the appellant from adjoining land owned by the private LPA No.932 of 2011(O&M) respondents in khasra No.100/3. If that is so, no loss has been caused to the appellants. Before the learned Single Judge, it was not urged that the concession was not given before the officer below. No case is made out for interference. Dismissed. (Jasbir Singh) Judge 24.05.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) gk Judge 2