CRM-M No.35074 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. CRM-M No.35074 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.01.2011 Deepa ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondents. Coram:- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh 1.Whether reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgement ? 2. To be referred to reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Hooda, Addl. AG, Haryana for the State. ... Alok Singh, J (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that as per prosecution story, Islam was driving truck carrying cows for slaughtering purpose and on the Naka, S.I. Signaled to stop the truck, however, instead of obeying the signal, Islam tried to take police party under the vehicle with intent to kill them. He further argued that petitioner's name has figured on the disclosure statement of Islam, who has stated in his statement that the petitioner was also present in the truck. CRM-M No.35074 of 2010 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner further argued that the disclosure statement made before the police implicating the accused, is a weak type of evidence in view of Section 25 of the Evidence Act. Learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana on the instructions of Mr. Radhey Sham, ASI, has argued that since the petitioner was present in the same truck, which was being driven by Islam, co- accused, who instead of stopping the truck, tried to take the police party under the truck, the petitioner is not entitled to any bail and has been rightly found involved in the offence under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC. Without commenting on the merit of the case, present petition is allowed with the direction that the petitioner be released on bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. ( Alok Singh ) Judge 21.01.2011 sk.