^'^ ^' Tv^ "41'i)l<y>i|, ®Tfl'M'IC,JsKrtiyy •WR-IT 9-affSR .ld,.£.. >...^^^ •V^ 200(; 3n^?r T|°W ( aii^r^rft^T?- Wn 3!A";^-<HT ^giWdfOT <RI^T PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS: -Vetsus- 'chl^Td^h 'RFf^f '^.1^t^ •d<l^l< ^ 3TRPT ^TI^f Chhattisgarh State Etectricity Board, P.0. Sunder Nagar, Danganiya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), through its Secretary. Union of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi - 110001, through its Secretary Also at: Central Revenue Building, Civi! Lines, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Union of India, Ministry of Finance, Centrai Board of Direct Taxes, North Block, NewDelhi-110001 Also at: Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Chief Commissioner of In- come Tax, Raipur. The Assistant Commissioner of In-come Tax, Circle 1 (2), Raipur. (Writ petjtion under Articie 226 rejad with Article 227 ofthe Constitution of India) -A- Division Bench: - Hon'ble Shri L.C. Bhadoo & Hon'ble Shri Sunil Kumar Sinha. JJ. 29.1-2008:- Shri P.S. Koshy, counsel forthe petitioner. Shri B.K. Rawat, Central Govt. Counsel for the respondents. Heard. Learned counsei for the respondents submitted that in this writ petition the petitioner has sought reliefs that respondent No.2 be directed to issue appropriate orders/directions under Section 119 (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to respondents No.3 & 4, further respondents No.3 & 4 be directed to accept the income tax returns filed by the petitioner and respondent No.2 be directed to issue appropriate orders under Section 119 (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. He further submitted that as far as relief sought in para-J (iv) of this petition is concerned, this relief has already been inciuded in another writ pefition bearing W.P.fONo.5723/2007, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel also submitted that directions sought for have already been issued by the Board and the Chief Commissioner. Therefore, in this matter, nothing sun/ives. In view of the above, we are of the view that since directions have already been issued by the concerned authority, nothing suroives in this writ petition. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Ban/e Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Juage Sdf- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge