ff- 0^.^."""""' 1 ^-^s^^' p.tSt"'if''Ay" " _.....•••••" P(es *^l'*i'\l.<?S....--"""""" i......i-A;--" IN THE HIGH COURT OF TUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER WRIT PETITION NQ. S€r1i /2006 , Jitendra Kumar Sang, S/o Late Shri Sadhuram Sang, Aged about 25 years, R/o. Village Lalutola, Post - Chichola, Tahsil and Dish'ict - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS -/ v^^'c/ .^ .^1 f.c^D-cor /'-'a'"" .\ .lofc CL^ G.^^8t)y» 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Education Department (School), D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Union of India, Through - The Secretary, Personal, Public Grievance and Pension Minish'y, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi 3. The State of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretary - Education Department Valabh Bha^van, Bhopal (C.G.) 4. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, CoIIectorate, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICiES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (1) PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: (2) Palrticulars of the petitioner are same as above in the cause title. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: Farticulars of the respondents are same as above in the cause title. 1 XI-HC-22 T3 •^ll<41d4, aTli'M'ls, 'f^TRTy siit?i^r /^ai?7 sn^r y i<i*i<fra)iicff .f^t. •f5- 3»^^ojo "WI. 2 3Ti^?iTOnw^ifei 20-1-2006 Petjtioner byShri Kunal, Advc Shri Vivek Sharma, Panel for Shri V.S. Tiwari, Advocate counsel forthe Union of tndia. Heard. This case relates to comi upon thfe death 6f an emp!oyee servi Learned eounsel tor the pe' death of the employee occurred on not earlier.It is further submitted N6.1322/2002 involving the same qi this Court on 20/12/2005. He prays this case also. Learned counsel for the Stafe states that the State of Chhattisgarh cases of dependants of those emplc strictly in accordance with the poiic' submits that four months time for given: In view of the submissions for the parties, without expressing al in the opinion of this Court, ends of| given to the State of Chhattisgarl| consider and decide the case of t| policy prevalent at the time of deat( petitioner found eligible, appointmi possible preferably on or. before 31( directed to render due co-operatior| that if any grievance still remains, availabte under the law including fili^ With the aforesaidobservatiot Certjfied copy as per rules. Copy to the State counsel, the order to the i-espondents for corrj] '^Flferih ifftRK 4 fB^t TfSR ^srf^sn^r ^R?R ttie State Qf Chhattisgarh. ij)pears on behalf of Shri B. Kinger, ^ssionate appointment consequent ^g inthe State. ptioner categorically stated that the 126-8-1999 i.e. after 1-11-1997 and |iat in batch of cases bearing W.P. lestion, orders have been passed by Ithatsimilar orders may be passed in does not dispute the above fact and |has taken a decision to consider the lyees who died on or after 1/11/1997 prevalent at that time. He however issuing necessary orders may be jnade by learned cbunsel appearing nyopinion on the merits ofthe case, justicewill be served if a direction is and the authorities concerned to )e petitioner in accordance with the ofthe employee concerned. Ifthe nt orders will be issued as early as May, 2006. The petitioner is also to the authorities. It is made clear the petitioner may avail the remedy ig ofthe petition before thisCourt. is, this petition stands disposed of., vho will be obiiged to communicate >liance. Sd'- Fakhruddir Judge