1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI.APPLICATION NO.2474 OF 2007 (RAMRAO SAMPAT AMBHORE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTH.) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri S.R.Narnaware, Advocate for the Applicant. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 10, 2008. 1. Though respondents No.4 and 5 are not served, it is not necessary to wait for their service. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.P.P. for respondents No.1 and 2. 3. Considering the nature of allegations, namely that applicant's son had attempted to dash the complainant and his wife with his motor cycle in a dispute which arose on the question of applicant's vacating his official quarter, arrest of the applicant for the purpose of investigation may not be necessary should the investigation eventually disclose non- 2 involvement of the applicant in which case police will file appropriate final report. If applicant's involvement is detected and chargesheet is filed the applicant would still be at liberty to examine material tendered against him and seek appropriate relief before the appropriate forum. 4. The application is, therefore, disposed of with the direction that the applicant need not be arrested for the purpose of this investigation. JUDGE RR.