Hm; wum :3? CHHAmsmRH: mmSPUR mawetmoa gm mo 44w of 2&8 ?eiiti¢ner 3K. Kut‘nara {Shawn in imcuqned orcfer) KR. Kwhara aged 52 years: Sen of Shri Ramadhin Kmhara; Sub Engineer; Water Resaurces Department. Sub Divisicn No.1‘ Admabad, Baiod) Distt. Burg, CG, Vetsus Respondents tate Gavemment of Chhaftisgarh, thmugh the Secretary; Water Resources Department Ministry, D.K.S, Bhawarw, Raipur (CG). (Writ Petmsn under Artéme 226 cf the Ccnstikuircm of hdia} $3: Hon’bie Mr. Sak§$h K. Agnihairi, J. #resent: $hr§ Ssmkant Verma, csunse! far the petitisnsr. shri Arum 8&0, Gov“: Advacate with Smt. 8m§ta Ghai, Panef Lawyer for the Stat 0am. oRoER ragged w; this 13*“ day at Augugti 2:393) With me consent of reamed counsei appearing for the names, the petition is r heard fineriy: 2) Learned counsei aepearmg for the petitioner submits that the petitroner does not want to press this petition on merits, at this stage. However, the peiiiioner may be permiited to make a representation before the oonoemed aurhortties within a period of three days and the same may be directed to be considered and decided, inaooordance with raw, within the prescribed time. 3) Shri Aron Sao, teamed Govt. Advocate appearing tor the $tate submits that if the representation ie made, the same strait be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with iaw, on its own merits, within a period of two Weeks from the date of receipt oi the representation. 4} Shri Sao further submits that no coercive steps shaii be taken against the l, petitioner, tiiithe disposaiot‘the representation. 5) i hope and trust that the State Goverrirneht shaii examine the representation o‘oieotiveiv in accordance with iaw and guideiines, issued by the Government tii we to time 6) in View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed ct, No order as to costs Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Raiu. e ‘