1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 1434 of 2008 [S.S. Lambkane Vs. Edn. Officer [Second.], ZP, Bhandara & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. Shashikant Borkar, Advocate for the petitioner. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 31st March,2008. 1. Heard. 2. Petitioner is challenging the Judgment and order passed by the School Tribunal dismissing the petitioner's appeal. 3. Admittedly, the petitioner had served only two years. Petitioner's equation that serving for a complete duration of two years is equal to serving for probation and, in turn, is equal to confirmation in service is a far fetched legal fiction. 4. Confirmation is an act which has to follow in express manner after completion of two years where the Management has to record 2 satisfaction of service to continue the employee. This being absent in the present case, the petitioner's challenge is without any foundation. 5. The Judgment and Order of the School Tribunal is well reasoned. It does not suffer from any error as to law or jurisdiction. 6. In the circumstances, no interference is called for. Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. Judge |Hedau|