IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST, TWO THOUSAND AND NINE CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3475 OF 2009 Between: Annem Satyanarayana Reddy … Petitioner/Appellant And: Ambati Venkata Siva Reddy ….. Respondent. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3475 OF 2009 ORDER: The matter is coming up for admission. Sri B.S. Reddy, learned counsel lodged a caveat on behalf of the respondent. Sri Veera Reddy, learned counsel, representing for the petitioner, had taken the Court to the grounds of the revision and also pointed out the findings recorded by the appellate court and several improbabilities in relation to the Revenue records in particular. The learned counsel for the petitioner also would maintain that in the facts and circumstances, it would be just and proper to maintain status-quo obtaining as on today with a further direction to dispose of the suit itself at an early date. To the contrary, Sri B.S. Reddy, learned counsel, representing the respondent, would maintain that in the light of the concrete convincing reasons, recorded both in the initial court and also in the appellate court, this is not a fit matter to be entertained. The learned counsel also would maintain that in the event of interim order being passed by this Court, the respondent would be put to serious loss. Heard both sides. The Civil Revision Petition is filed by the Revision Petitioner being aggrieved by an order dated 2.2.2009 passed in C.M.A.No.13/2007 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Kurnool at Nandyal confirming the orders dated 30.10.2007 passed in IA No.1261 of 2007 in O.S.No.432 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal. The Court of first instance, after recording the evidence produced by both parties, marked Ex.A-1 to A-13 and Ex.B-1 to B-5 and ultimately came to the conclusion that the petitioner is not in possession of the plaint schedule property and the respondent had made out the prima facie case and the balance of the convenience is also in favour of the respondent and accordingly dismissed the IA No.1261 of 2007 in OS No.432 of 2007 with costs. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed C.M.A.No.13 of 2007 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Kurnool at Nandyal. Before the appellate court, Ex.A-14, true copy of Village Account No.3 Adangal/Pahani for Fasali 1417, is marked on behalf of the appellant and Ex.B-6 Pattadar pass book issued by the Mandal Revenue Officer, Gadivemula, Ex.B-7 Title deed book issued by Mandal Revenue Officer, Gadivemula, B-8 Village Account No.3 Adangal/Pahani for the Fasali 1417 had been marked on behalf of the respondent. The appellate court, after recording the reasons, came to the conclusion that the Civil Miscellaneous Application is devoid of merits and the same is to be dismissed and accordingly the C.M.A No.13 of 2007 is dismissed without costs. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition had been preferred before this Court. When an application for temporary injunction is being disposed, certain observations would be made. It is needless to say that those observations would be made for the purpose of disposal of such application. Be that as it may, this Court had given much consideration to the reasons had been recorded by the Court of first instance and also the appellate Court. In the light of the convincing reasons recorded, this Court is of the opinion that this is not a fit matter to be entertained under the Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly the Civil Revision Petition shall stand dismissed. But however, in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances, let the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal, make an endeavor to dispose of the main suit itself in OS No.432 of 2007, at the earliest point of time, preferably, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed subject to the above direction. No order as to costs. ___________________ Date:20.08.2009 P.S.NARAYANA,J Gk. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3475 OF 2009 ORDER: Date:20.08.2009 Gk.