1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Second Bail App. No. 4257/2007 (Vinod Kumar alias Titu vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : September 03, 2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.R.S.Chouhan, for the petitioner. Mr.Vishal Raj Mehta, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the challan papers. The first bail application came to be dismissed when the matter was at the investigation stage. However, after investigation, the police has filed the challan. I have carefully gone through the challan papers as also the injury report. A single injury measuring ¾” x ½” by blunt object on right upper occipital region has been suffered by injured. There is no repetition of injury. Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 2 Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Vinod Kumar alias Titu s/o Banwari be released on bail in FIR No.109/2007, P.S. Bhirani, Distt. Hanumangarh provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/ -