1 wp.2625.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2625 OF 2010 Vishnu Ramchandra Adlinge ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... None for Petitioner. Mr.D.P.Adsule, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND U.D.SALVI, JJ. DATED:- SEPTEMBER 16, 2010. P.C. 1. Considering the fact that the trial for offence punishable under Sections 394, 395 and 396 of the Indian Penal Code has already ended in conviction of the Petitioner and which order of conviction and sentence has been upheld by this Court, it is not possible to reopen the said proceedings. The said decision having allowed to become final, the grievance made in the Petition cannot be countenanced. Petitioner is free to take recourse to such other remedy as may be advised to assail the decision of this Court in dismissing the Appeal preferred by him. 2. Petition disposed of accordingly. 2 wp.2625.10.sxw 3. Copy of this order be forwarded to the Petitioner who is in jail. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)