IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13015 of 2009 LAKHINDRA RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 04.03.2011 The petitioner has challenged the order of cognizance dated 08.11.2008, whereby on the basis of charge sheet submitted by the police after investigation, cognizance has been taken under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504/34 and of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his argument to the effect that the Word “Sangyan” has been written upon the dotted line. The aforesaid practice of the learned Court below cannot be approved, as apparently, it appears that the word “Sangyan” has been written in different handwriting on the dotted line. Let this finding of the Court be communicated to the concerned S.D.J.M. Since the order of cognizance has been passed on the basis of material available on record during investigation. I see no reason to interfere with the order. However, the petitioner is at liberty to raise all his contentions at the time of framing of charges if 2 the charges have already not been framed. With the liberty above, this application is disposed off. Bhardwaj/- ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)