1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.255 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.618 OF 1997 Smt.Pariksha Dattatraya Vartak .. Appellant Vs. Barve Education Society and Ors. .. Respondents Mrs.Anita Agarwal for the appellant Ms.Kavita Yadav i/b M/s.V.S.Pardkar for respondent no.1 and 2 Mr.S.D.Rairikar, A.G.P. for respondent no.3 CORAM : J. N. Patel, Acting C.J., B.R.Gavai, J. DATE : February 05, 2010 P.C. : 1. The appellant challenges the order dt.08.03.07 passed by the learned single Judge of this court thereby dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant and confirming the order passed by the learned School Tribunal. 2. It is the contention of the appellant that the appellant was appointed on a clear and permanent vacancy. It is further the contention that the workload would show that the appointment was on a permanent basis. It is therefore, submitted that the learned School Tribunal so also the learned 2 single Judge has erred in dismissing the appeal of the petitioner. 3. On perusal of the impugned order of the Tribunal, we find that the learned School Tribunal after examining the various appointment orders issued in favour of the appellant has confirmed the finding of the fact recorded by the learned School Tribunal that the appointment was purely on temporary basis and that was against the leave vacancy. It also found that various appointment orders were made to the petitioner for short duration. 4. The learned single Judge has found that the finding of the learned School Tribunal that the appellant was not appointed on a permanent basis but against a leave vacancy on a temporary basis needs no interference. 5. We do not find any error has been committed by the learned single Judge to warrant interference. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) (B.R.GAVAI, J)