C.R.R. No.2070 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.R. No.2070 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision 18.01.2011 Rukseena …Petitioner Versus Mohammad Tahir and another …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI -.- Present: Ms. Bhupinder Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Salim Ahmed, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. Shalini Attri, D.A.G., Haryana. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed against the judgment and order dated 18.5.2010 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Nuh allowing the revision petition of respondent No.1 and giving him superdari of the motor-cycle. C.R.R. No.2070 of 2010 (O&M) -2- The learned Additional Sessions Judge has noticed that the motor-cycle was purchased on 22.4.2009 while the marriage took place on 01.05.2009 and all the documents were also on the name of the respondent No.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that proximity on the point of time shows that the motor-cycle must have been given by way of dowry. In my opinion, no such assumption can be made merely because of this factor of proximity of time. In the circumstances, it cannot be said that the conclusion drawn by the learned Additional Sessions Judge is so palpably perverse or erroneous so as to justify interference in the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Consequently, the revision petition is dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) January 18, 2011 JUDGE ashish