^1. c^'\(fol' IN THE HIQH COURT OF JUDICATUKE CHHATT.I SGARH AT BILASPUR. •(.' u-> P /Vo z'^.se '&.y /°3 APPLICANT VERSUS RESPONBENCS. -/'^^^ ^y^ ^-""' t ^. .'I ^.^^ ? ^^ ,1"'..'^ . f* !SSS ^y ^ ^"i 'w ^^ y «^"" '^' /" *•• .. . ^ ^\ i^'^~W3\ ^ .yi f5s's-^-w/wy: 'w. n •\ ^ "' ^ /.-?' ^^ 'li.) :^?'f .re?- H.X.s.Uekay S/o H.N.s.Uekay 'aged 40 yrs. Working as Depot Manager, M.P.S.R.T.C. Ghhattisgarh Infra Structure Development Gorpora- tion Baloda Bgzar, Tahsil Baloda Bazar» Bistrict Raipur -C.S. 1. Chhattisgarh Infra^Strueture* Development Corporation, Raipur. 2. Managing Direetor, C.I.D.C.Ralpur C.S. 3. Divisional Manager*C.I.D.C. (I-IPSR'IC) Raipur (c.G.). 4. Di.vi sional Aecount Officer, C.I.D.C.dlPSRTC) Raipur C.G. 5. Madhya Pradesh Road Transport Corporation, Bhopal M.P. 6. Maaaging Direetor, M.P.S.R.T.C.Bhopal (M.p.) 7. Div-Lsional Kanager, M.P.S.R.T.C.Bhopal (M.P.) 8. Divisional Aecount Officer. MPSRTC Bhopal (M.P.) 9. Divigional Mgnager* MPRTC Jabalpur. 10. Blvisional Account Officer, M.P.R.T.C. JabalpurM.P. 11. Divisional Manager» M.P.R.T.C. Rewa. 12. Divisional Account Officer, M.P.R.T.C. fiewa. 13. Nodel Officer» Head of Department, Govt.of Chhattisgarti Raipur C.G. • • A.B • •s>s?-« ''vs-Htani ^ r /' ;'•' . State of Chhattisgarh, Chief Seeretary» Secretarieate* Raipur p.6. / WRIT^EIITIPN_UNDER_AR3'ICLES_22§^'.S^D 227 QE^ftiS CONSTIIUIIPN_ACT. _p <»v^.-l -^ ii ^ ~ i~ VS 4* -* /->tt^l /^ lf?4 1 :IF^O w s?^ L3-</ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRTT PETmON No. 2386 of2003 : H.K.S.Uekay. VERSUS : Chhattisgarii InfrastructBre Corporation & Others. Developinent WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF IBE CONSTmjT^ QF mpiA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aenihotri. J. Present None forthe petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Govemment Advooate fortfae State ORALORDER (Passed on 19" day of March, 2010) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalfofthe petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. In view of tiie above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Consequently, M(W)P No. 2194/2003, is also dismissed. Sd/- Satish K; Aguihotri Judge Asnt