Petitioner CB VJ €?‘\m$ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 5R8 $ing§a 3&n‘éii KATTAMRAM PRASHAD , S/o Shri Kattam Malla, aged about 26 years, Shikasha Karmi class 3rd Primary School Mishiguda, Block Konta District South Bastar Dantewara [C.G.) Versus The State of Chhattisgarh, Through: — The Secretary, Chhattisgarh S. C. 8a S.T. Development Department, Mantralaya D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, South Bastar, Dantcwara Dist‘ South Bastar, Dantewara (C.G.) The District Education Officer, South Bastar Dantcwara, Dist. South Bastar Dantewara, (C.G.) The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Dantewara , Dist. South Bastar, Dantewara (C.G.) The Block Education Officer Konta, South Bastar, Dantewara Dist. South Bastar, Dantewara (C.G.) W.P. (S) NO. / 2009 . The Chief Execujcive Officer Konta, Janpad Panchayat Konta, Dist. South Bastar, Dantewara (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE QE/6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF‘ INDIA FORIISSUAVNCE OF WRITE IN NATURE OF AMUSI CERTIORARI ,PROHABITAION, etc. AND / OR FOR ORDER AND / OR DIECTION / DIRECTIONS IN NATURE OF WRIT. 6 (an iEvQ‘ 9% RESPONDENTS . WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHEATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5583 of2009 Kanamram Prashad. VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh & Others. w SB: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. A nihotri‘ J. Present: Shri Vijay Krishna Rao Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 25 day of Septembex; 2009) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, on instructions: submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage and prays that the respondent authorities may be directed to consider and decide his representation dated 04m June, 2009 (Amiexure P/5) pending before the respondent No. 2, as early as possible. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that in the event, the representation, as stated above is pending consideration, the same shailibe considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits, Within a period of four weeks form the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 'In View of the above, according to iearned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of. IV ,V V Sd/' ‘ i’ i 1", V- Satish.K.Agnihotri ‘ i I J Judge “Amt nu-A‘K I