@ € HEGH COURT OF CHEATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETXTEON (S) No. 3479 0f2008 PETYTIONER : Drip Singh Padmakar S/o Late Shri Raja Ram Padmakar, aged about 50 years, Assistant Gi'ade I}, 6/0 Deputy Dhector, Veterinary Services, District Dantewada (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the ecretary, Department of Veterinary Services, Mantraiaya DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2. Director, Directorate of Veterinary Services, Near Guru Tej Bahadur Park, GE. Road, Raipur (0G) 3. Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, District Dantewada (C,G.) 4. Treasury 0%cer, Treasury and Accounts, District Dantewada (CG) WR FT ?FT?WON 'I FNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’hie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. ?resent: Shri Rakesh Anthony Advo'eate for the yetitioner Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Govenmient Advocate for the State/ respondents, QRAL ORDER (Passed on 07m day 0f July, ZOGS) With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finaily. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merit at this stage, excerpt that the petitioner be permitted to make a representation to the authorities concerned, which may be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merit, to which learned counse} appearing for the State/ respondents has no obj ectioni, It is ordered accordingly. The respondent-authorities are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with iaw on its own merit, as expeditiously as possibie. in View ofthe above, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. . I. 3d]- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge jf“zilr S