IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.213 of 2007 SABHAPATI RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 2.9.2008 This revision application has been filed against the order of acquittal dated 18.12.2006 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Siwan in Sessions Trial No. 199 of 2006. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the impugned order. On perusal of the impugned order it appears that six witnesses were examined in course of trial and all six witnesses turned hostile and did not support the prosecution story. Other accused persons have also been acquitted in different trial on 18.10.2001. Only submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no process was actually served upon the informant, as a result of which he did not turn up for evidence. Considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and also perused the impugned judgment. Having regard to the facts and circumstances I find no illegality or impropriety in the impugned order which warrants interference under revisional jurisdiction at the instance of the private party. This revision application is accordingly dismissed. B.Jha (Ghanshyam Prasad)