mgjka {36“m 5" [ W ’3 m £04., IN THE HON‘*BLE HIGH wURT OF GIHATI‘IWARI-I AT BILA5PUR ’éf wan PETITION No; r7357 Hoes 3.3. / ggrx'rmma z— / Bishat Ram sahu son cf Kartikram 3am, aged abeut 52 years, dismissed Forest Gnard, resident of 'Gariya- band, Post Gariyaband, District Dhamtari (C.G.). VERSUS The State of chhattisgarh Through ~ $ecretary, Deparunent o£ Ecrest D.K.S’ ahavan, Raipur (CoGo). The Divisional Forest efficer, Raipur East Forest Division Raipur (C.G.). The Rang off ieerCEorest) Ga riyaband region; Gariyaband ( C.G. ) WRIT PETITION UND/ER ARgmaE 22/6/‘/227 0f THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIR g v , . XI—HC—78 MW,W,W . M;¢ NO ’795 2&05 tam-(arm 200 ‘.f ‘ WW(W) ‘ ' mmm WWW 15.a3.2095 'mmawm \ agwm Shri M.K. Bhaduri, gour Shri Sanjay S. Agrawz advance copy. Heard on admiSSion. This petition ‘ has bee: passed by I‘éspondent N0. 2 on —xf 'the ‘Very outset; lean that under Rule 23 0f the MP Contrbl and Appeai) Rules, 12 the petitioner has no‘i avaik permission Vto Withdraw this y before the appropriate authorit} Since alternatiVe remed' no impedimem in granting p61 on above telm. V ‘ Accordingly, the pemis petitioner to f11e an appeai bet} ed as Withdrawn with liberty to the The petition is dismiss tsel for the petitioner. LL Govt. Advocate for the State on i filed against the order of dismissal [4.2.2005 (AimexureLP/s). ted counsel for the, petitioner submits ((3.62) Civii Services (Classification, *66: there'is a provision of appeal but 'd the aforesaid remedy He seeks etition with liberty to file an appeal 'unde'r the aforesaid Rule. V is available to the'petitioner, there is mission for‘withclrawal of the petition non is granted. provisions ofthe aforesaid Rule >re the appropriate authority under the ‘Si Sdl- r—J‘i‘ Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge