(V ‘ HEGH COURT U: CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W'I‘it Patitioa (S) N0. 6E9 0f200j_ EBE’I‘ETEQNER Dr. Smt. Ananda Gupta, aged about 36 years, W/o Shi‘i Sardar Kumar Gupta, r/o Ward N0. i N Road, Manendragarh, Bisti. 3urguja. VERSIE . State of M.P. through ihe Secretaiy, Depanment, “Valiabh Bhawan, Bhopal. Add ew Sabjee Mandi RESPONDENlb Higher Education itional Director HI Higher Etiucation Depamnem, Satpura Bhwan, Bhopal. 3. The Principai, Govt. Vivekazmad Degree Coiiege p;- Maneudragarh, MP. (WRIT PETIIEON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION w_ (SB: Han’bie Mr. Satish K. A ‘ Otri. J.) OF INDIA) Pre§ent : Mm Sushobhi’i Sim: 1, Advocate for the petitioner. Paiiei Shri Y.S. Lawyer Thaktir, for the Deputy State. Advocate Geiterai with Smt. Smita Ghai, ORA i. {mime {Eagseti en 19m day ofMat'ch, 2&99) }’\V\ Witt} the cement ot‘the paities, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. l. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is identical to the case ofDr. Smt. Sarojbaia ‘Shyag Bishnoi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & ()thers (WP. further submits that the present petition may also be disposed ofin the same terms as passed iii the matter ofDr. Sint. Sarojbala Shyag Bislmoi (Supra). Shri Tliakur, learned Depttty Advocate General, appearing for the State, submits that he has no objection it the same order is passed in the present No. 4099/2003}. Leamed counsel 5)x petition aiso. 3. Accordingy, the petition is r disposed of in the sanie terms i.e. having \ consie'iered . and Without expressing any opinion on merits ot‘tlie case, in the p Opinion oi‘this court, e-ricis ofjustice wi11 be sewed if a iiirection is given to the petiiimer to make a deiaiiad representatiori raising his grievances before $he compe‘teni authority/respomient N0. 2 along Wiih a copy ofthe petition and this order, Within a month, and on such represen‘iation being fEEed, the cempetent authority/respOilelent \Io 2 shaH decide {he same on its own merits, in accoriiance with law, as early as possible preferabiy Within three months from ihe date ofreceipt of the representation. It is made clear that if any grievance still subsists the petitiorier may avail the remedy avaiiabie umei A .+‘the , law. No order asto costs. \/ Consequently, pending appiicat‘ions, if any, standdisposed of. h. k Sd/-‘ Satish K. Agniiaosr: ‘Judge