'^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISi AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P. N0. » /20101 APPLICANTS s^^ s."-; ^fr-•""'».<i^ ^^^--">'^^ ....-^'^!...--" ).\--" t<^r,..--"" "t^AS ^ A5 ^- \^ -?°' VERSUS RESPONDENT Rama, Wd/o- Late Pawari Patel, Aged About-32 years, R/o- Nawapara, Thasil- Dabhara, Distt. Janjgir- Champa(C.G.) Isha (Minor), D/o- Late Pawan Patel, Aged About-7 years, i Tishu(Minor), S/o- Late Pawan Patel, Aged About-3 years, Applicant No. 2 and 3 Through Mother Rama, Wd/o- Late Pawan Patel, R/o- NawapSra, Thasil- Dabhara, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Vishnu Agrawal, S/o- Roopchand Agrawal, Aged About- 43 years, R/o- Shakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) r HiG'ri COURT OF CMHATTiSGARH AT SsLASPUR Cr.iW.P.Mo.729of2S10 ApDsscants 1. Rama, Wd/o-Lais Pawan Paisi, Aged About-32 years, R/o-Nawspara, Tahsii-Dabhara, Distt.Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2. isha (Minor), D/o-Late Pawan Patei, Agsd About-7 years, 3. Tishu (hflinor), S/o-Late Pawan Patsi, Aged About-3 years, Appiicant No.2 and 3 Through iviother Rama, Wd/o-Late Pawan Pate!, R/c- Nawapara, Tahsii-Dabhara, Distt.Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Respondent Versus Vishnu Agrawai, S/o-Roopchand Agrawa!. Aged AbouS-43 years. R/o- Shakti, Distt.Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) (Petition under Sectson 482 ofthe Cr.P.C.) (SB: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) Mr.Vinay Pandey, counsel ftsr the appiicants. Mr.Ankit Singhai, counsei for th®respondsnt. ORDER{ORAL) (Passed on 19s" April, 2011) 1. Heard on i.A.Nos.1 and 2 for taking additionai dkscumente on record. 2, On due consideration, i.A.Nos.'S and 2 ara aiiowed. Documents ar®taken on record. 3. By this pstftion under Ssction 482 of ths Cr.P.C., tte appiicants have chaiienged iegaiity and propriety of the order dated 8.4.2010 passed by the Addit'sonai Sessions Judge, Sakti, Sessions Division Janjgir-Channps in Crimina! Revision No.28/2010. 4. Learnsd counsei for the appiicants substantiaity argued that without providing an opportunsty of hearing to ths partiss on the ground not mertioning sn Section 7 of the Negotiable Instrumsnts Act, 1W1, ths revisiona! Court has aitowad ths revision and dismsssed ihe complaint. /\u aSpnp BaijBqsyi ~/PS ^ - S,i,OZ'S'S uo ynoo ieuojsiASj eqi sjoieq }usssjd o} pspajip SJE seiyed •tise^e .ispuo eqi ssed [ieqs UOSSIASJ 341 ui us^ei punoiB si|} uo ssiyEd ©41 oi 6uuesq p Ajiunpoddo [jn^ BuipiAOjd leys ynoo ieuoisiAsj eyi •spise ias Aqajaq ss peuBndiui jepio pue PSMO!]B si uoiiij.ed sq} 'A]}U8nbasuoo •^ •linoo [euoisiAej sqi ejo^eq p9|y uojsiAsj ©4}uo ssi^ed eq^ 0} Suueeq 10 Aiiuniioddo UE spiAojd o? jsusq sq p|no/A li 'psuSnduui jspjo ei(} ui IUSLULUOO jsijyn, }noi)jyv\ -9 •seiyed SLiip^jBLisq uo paiy siuaiunoop jsq}o ,o ssidos pue psuSnduii jspjo sij? pssmsd SAeq j •c -7-