IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29083 of 2010 NIRANJAN RAI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 366, 376 and 120(B) of the I.P.C. The complainant has admitted in paragraph no. 1 of the complaint that she is married lady but in paragraph no. 2 of the complaint it is alleged that on 17.10.2009 the physical relationship was established by petitioner no.1 forcibly on promise of marrying the complainant. It is submitted that occurrence has taken place on 17.10.2009 and the complaint was filed on 07.11.2009. The complaint petition does not contain any medical report. Petitioner no. 2 is the father of petitioner no. 1. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have certain enmity with the complainant which resulted into filing of the present complaint. Considering the nature of allegation 2 and unexplained delay in lodging of the complaint, let the petitioners, Niranjan Rai and Kamla Prasad Rai, be released on bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Azamnagar P.S. Case No. 58 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Katihar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)