IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 10664 of 2009 Date of decision: March 01, 2012 Shanti Suman .. Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Alok Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shubhra Singh, DAG, Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. Siddharath Batra, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3. Hemant Gupta, J The petitioner is claiming an alternative plot in lieu of plot No.2552-P, Sector 57, Gurgaon. Earlier the said plot was allotted to one Pinki Bhatia vide letter of allotment dated 2.2.2005, but subsequently, it was re-allotted to Munish Sharma. Subsequently, it was allotted to the petitioner vide letter of allotment dated 15.9.2005. The petitioner was allotted plot No.2257, Sector 57, Gurgaon as the possession of the said plot could not be delivered. The petitioner has dispued the allotment of the said plot claiming that it is not comparable to the plot allotted to her earlier. In the written statement, it has been pointed out that the petitioner has been allotted plot No.2257-P in lieu of the plot allotted earlier and that the said plot is also a preferential plot. Keeping in view the assertion of the respondents in the written statement, learned counsel for the petitioner accepts the said plot and does not press the present writ petition. Disposed of accordingly. (Hemant Gupta) Judge March 01, 2012 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge