IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 455 of 2009 (S/S) Padam Dutt Bahuguna & others. ……Petitioners Versus State and others …….Respondents Mr. Rahul Consul, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, Brief Holder for respondents No. 1 to 5. Dated:-21-09-2010 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 26.05.2008, passed by respondent No. 1, denying the petitioners the benefit of the selection grade. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that petitioners have an alternative remedy to approach the Tribunal concerned in view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Bhuwan Chand Pandey Vs. State of Uttarakhand, reported in U.D. 2006 (2) Pg. 439. In view of the above, the petitioners have an alternative remedy before the Public Service Tribunal. Therefore, the writ petition is relegated to the tribunal concerned for redressal of the petitioners’ grievance. The Registry of this Court is directed to send the record of the case to the Tribunal concerned. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of finally. (B.S.Verma, J.) 21-09-2010 S