1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Letters Patent Appeal No. 310 of 2007 In WP No. 957 of 1995 The Divisional Controller v. C.M. Jaiswal -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Ku Shweta Wankhede, Adv for appellant Shri B.M. Khan, Adv for respondent Coram : S.A. Bobde and P.D. Kode, JJ Dated : 21st April 2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This is an appeal against the judgment of the learned single Judge refusing to interfere with the finding of the Labour Court. Respondent was charged with re-issue of tickets by making erasions while performing duties as conductor on a bus being plied on Balapur- Akola road. A charge-sheet was issued and after completing enquiry, respondent was dismissed from service. 2. Respondent challenged his termination before the Labour Court. . The Labour Court held that the findings of enquiry officer were perverse and punishment of termination was shockingly disproportionate. The Labour Court ordered 2 reinstatement of respondent in service with 50% back-wages. The learned single Judge refused to interfere in writ petition on the ground that findings of facts have been reached properly by the Labour Court and moreover, the learned single Judge observed that an amount of Rs. 40.80 was recovered from the respondent. If indeed, the respondent had re-issued fifteen tickets of Rs. 1.20 and twenty tickets of Rs. 3/-, the amount found with him would have been more than Rs. 40.80. 3. In our view, the learned single Judge has not committed any error of law in refusing to interfere. Accordingly, Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. Judge. Judge. hsj