CRM NO. M-649 OF 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM NO. M-649 OF 2011 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 13.12.2011 Manju Verma ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. Jasbir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Padam Kant Dwiwedi, Advocate, for respondents No.4 to 18. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) Vide order dated 26.05.2011, it was observed by this Court as under :- “ Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that as per statement of father of the petitioner, her daughter Manju Verma is not in need of the security and no protection is required. Vide order dated 4.5.2011, petitioner was directed to remain present in Court today but inspite of that she has not come present. CRM NO. M-649 OF 2011 (O&M) -2- Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner undertakes to produce the petitioner on the next date of hearing. Adjourned to 19.7.2011. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner does not appear in the Court on the next date of hearing, it will be presumed that she is not interested in protection.” Thereafter, the case was adjourned to 19.7.2011 and 14.11.2011 and on both the dates, the petitioner was not produced. Learned counsel for the petitioner has showed his inability to produce the petitioner. So, in view of the order dated 26.05.2011, it is presumed that petitioner has no apprehension and as such, the present petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. DECEMBER 13, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE