1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR : J U D G M E N T : S.B. Civil Revision Petition No.173/2009. (Suraj Vs. Sunita) DATE OF JUDGMENT : May 18, 2009. P R E S E N T HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS ____________________________________ Mr. Shyam Ladrecha for the petitioner. BY THE COURT : In this revision petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 01.05.2009 passed by the District Judge, Bikaner in Civil Misc. Case No.127/2009, whereby, the application filed by the respondent under Order 9 Rule 7, C.P.C. has been allowed by the trial Court. Respondent filed divorce petition before the District Judge, Bikaner, in which, ex parte order was made on 06.03.2009 because, as per the observation made in the order- sheet, nobody was present on that date on behalf of the respondent. Thereafter, an application was moved under Order 9 Rule 7, C.P.C. by respondent Sunita, wife of the petitioner for setting aside the ex parte order. Learned trial Court, after considering the reasons mentioned in the application, allowed 2 the same setting aside the ex parte order dated 06.03.2009. Having perused the order, I am of the opinion that the learned trial Court has not committed any error while allowing the application for setting aside the ex parte order made on 06.03.2009 vide impugned order dated 01.05.2009. In this view of the matter, no case is made out for interference. This revision petition is, therefore, accordingly dismissed. (Gopal Krishan Vyas) J. Ojha, a.