IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 22ND AUGUST 2011 / 31ST SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 22738 of 2011(N) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): PARTY IN PERSON ------------------------------------------------ N. KRISHNA PRASAD, TC 29/97, M.K.K NAIR ROAD, PETTAH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.N.KRISHNA PRASAD (PARTY-IN-PERSON) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE CHIEF SECRETARY OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY (HOME), OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -1. 3. THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI -1. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. VIJU ABRAHAM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL OATH OF OFFICE OF MINISTERS AND FORGED OATH OF OFFICE OF THE STATE OF KERALA. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE CASE STATUS OF THE CASES RELATED TO OATH OF OFFICE. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN RP NO.708/03 (S)AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP 9552/2002 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF KERALA ON SANCTION PETITION NO.4/2005. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY THE ORDER OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN C.M.APPLN.NO.6092/2005 IN RP 708/03 IN OP 9552/02(S). EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF PETITION DATED 5.8.11 ADDRESSED TO THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY (HOME) GOVERNMENT OF KERALA. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL [ True copy ] P.S. to Judge. ul/- ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 22738 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of August , 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he has filed SLP(Civil) 7000/06 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and that he apprehends that during the period of his journey to the Apex Court and back and also during his stay in Delhi in connection with the said case, the people who are likely to be affected by the said litigation are likely to cause harm to his life. Therefore he made Ext.P6 application to the 2nd respondent with the following prayers. “In the circumstances narrated in the pre-paras and taking into account my own apprehensions and advice of my friends and well wishers, I beseech the Government of Kerala to secure my life, especially during the period of my journey to the Supreme Court of India and back and also my stay at Delhi in W.P.(C) No. 22738 OF 2011 :2 : connection with the about said case, expected to be listed for hearing shortly by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.” 2. It is seeking a direction to the respondents to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 this writ petition has been filed. 3. As already seen the prayer in this petition is to provide him protection. He has neither made any allegations that anybody has threatened him nor has implicated the persons who are causing threat to life. Further in the representations he has not disclosed any details such as the date of journey to the Supreme Court and the number of days he intends to stay in Delhi etc. In such circumstances, on account of lack of pleadings and materials substantiating the prayers, this court is unable to direct the respondents to take action on Ext.P6 submitted by the petitioner. Therefore there is no merit in this writ petition and hence it is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-