IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16783 of 2009 RANJEET SINGH son of late Mahendra Prasad Singh------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 6. 21.7.2010 Heard Learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner was executive agent of three schemes attributed for misappropriating its amount. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that either he completed the work to the extent money was advanced to him or deposited the same. A report from the concerned B.D.O. is there on record goes to show that none of the work was completed in Scheme no.1. Work was done for the advance money later balance amount is deposited but petitioner’s prayer was turned down in the year 2004 and since then there was no response on his behalf. Otherwise a liberal view was possible which now can be taken into consideration in regular side only. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below and pray for regular bail which shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this rejection order. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh,J )