IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 6910 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : 07.05.2009 Shakuntla Sharma and another .... PETITIONERS Versus The State of Haryana and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. Chander Mohan Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioners. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) The petitioners have filed this petition for issuing direction to respondent No.2 to adjust them in other Govt. aided schools as per Rule 59 (3) of the Haryana School Education Rules, 2003, or in the alternate, to give them voluntary retirement with all the retiral benefits. Concededly, before approaching this Court, the petitioners have not made any representation to the authorities. In view of this conceded fact, counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file representation before respondent No.2. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If any representation, as stated by counsel for the petitioners, the concerned CWP No. 6910 of 2009 -2- authority is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of the representation. May 07, 2009 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE