IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THIS THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1681 of 2009 Between: G. Prameela W/o. G. Shiva Prasad …. Petitioner AND Dinesh Reddy, Managing Director, APSRTC, Musheerabad, Hyderabad and another …. Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1681 of 2009 JUDGMENT: The petitioner was employed as a Conductor in the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation. She was compulsorily retired from the service through order dated 12-03-2008 on medical grounds. She filed Writ Petition No.8696 of 2008 alleging that she was not provided alternative employment. 2. The writ petition was allowed on 21-04-2008 directing the respondents to provide alternative employment to the petitioner in terms of Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995. 3. This Contempt Case is filed alleging that the respondents have not provided alternative employment to the petitioner. The respondents stated that an order dated 11-06-2008 was passed providing alternative employment to the petitioner, but she did not turn up inspite of repeated letters. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has taken away the file from him. 5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents, at some length, this Court passed an order dated 17-12-2009 directing the petitioner to appear before the respondents on 22-12-2009. It is stated that the petitioner did not turn up and on the other hand, submitted a letter dated 03-12-2009 stating that she is suffering from cancer and that she would report after she recovers from the illness. 7. If that is the matter, it cannot be said that there was any contempt on the part of the respondents. 8. Hence, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J August 04, 2010. KTL