IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2163 OF 2009 Nitin V. Patil & Anr. ..Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Mukesh v. Aiya for the Petitioner Mr. Anjali Helekar AGP for the Respondents CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE: 12th November , 2009 P.C. : Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that against the impugned order dated 21st October 2009 passed by Deputy Controller of Rationing, E/Region (Second Respondent), a Revision would lie before the State Government under clause 30 of the Maharashtra Food Grain Rationing (Second) Regulation 1966. In view of the availability of an alternate remedy by way of Revision, it would not be appropriate to entertain a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Petition shall stand dismissed on this ground. In order to enable the Petitioner to avail of the remedy in Revision and to apply for the grant of interim relief, the provisions contained in clause 4 of the impugned order dated 21st October 2009 shall not be enforced for a period of four weeks from today. (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J)