1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 103 OF 2008 Santosh A. Pathak. ... ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents. Ms. Renu Singh i/by Mr. N.M. Pendari for the Petitioner. Ms. A. S. Pai, Addl.P.P. for Respondent for the State. CORAM: BILAL NAZKI and S. A. BOBDE, JJ. DATED : 24TH MARCH, 2008. P. C.: Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is that although the complaint disclosing the offence is filed no action is taken. It is the case of the learned Counsel for the petitioner that now case has been registered by the police and it is being investigated. The petitioner is, however, aggrieved that the case is registered only against some of the accused and some have been left out. We do not wish to comment on this aspect as the investigation is still going on. If the petitioner feels he is aggrieved even after completion of investigation, he 2 may approach the Magistrate or any other lawful authority for redressal of his grievance. 2. With this observation, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (BILAL NAZKI, J.) Sd/- (S. A. BOBDE, J.)