1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1991/2009. Saint Kabit Buwasaheb Ashram and another -: versus :- Manikrao Raghuji Kawdase and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : APRIL 27, 2010. Heard Shri P. Gode, learned counsel for petitioners. An affidavit allegedly procured from office of Advocate was sought to be ushered in evidence after the appellants/applicants completed final arguments and matter was fixed for argument of other side. The other side did not advance those arguments and filed an application to take that document on record. Adhoc District Judge-2, Nagpur who is considering the said proceedings under Bombay Public Trust Act has found that the application moved was vague and does not give necessary particulars. It also noticed the conduct of respondents and therefore has rejected the application. In this situation, I do not find anything wrong. There is no jurisdictional error or perversity. The petitioner 2 can assail that order after the proceedings are finally decided by the Adhoc District Judge-2, Nagpur. Hence, with that liberty to present petitioners, Writ Petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.