!fiGl.F nF»u £0 (S> IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) N0. U gg OF 2011 PETITIONERS .^'^- .*•*' pX<^ n^-^".^ <l<y'^ ..-••",*'*\.^ ^-;,./-'^ RESPONDENTS 1] 2] 3] Parmanand Jaiswal S/o Shri Balaram Jaiswal, Aged about 35 years, presently working as Pump Operator. Smt. Sarla Yadav W/o Shri Surendra Kumar Yadav, Aged about 37 years, Presently working as Assistant Grade-III. Both are Daily wages employees, working in the Nagar Panchayat Bhatgaon, District Raipur (C.G.). VERSUS The State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). The Under Secretaiy, Department of Urban Administration and Development, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). The Nagar Panchayat Bhatgaon, Through Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Bhatgaon, District Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF INDLA PARTICULAR OF THE PETITIONERS:- As given above in the cause title. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS:- As given above in the cause title. PARTICULARS OF THE CAUSE/ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETITION IS BEING MADE:- The instant writ petition is directed against the letter/ notice dated 23.09.2010 (Annexure P/l), issued by respondent no. 2, whereby the respondent no. 3 vide ashok ^.-i .. .;!:.!,j i. HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1188 OF 2011 ParmahandJaiswal&Another Versus , Respondents 'he StateofChhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the ConstitutionoT India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AgnihotrU. Present:- Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate forthe petitioners. ShriY.S.Thakur, Dy. Advocate General forthe State. ORDER fORAU (Passed on 4th dayofMarch, 2011) -; 1. At the very outset, learned counselappearing for the parties jomtly and fairly submit that the issue invoived inlhe present petition as well as 'm Dhaniram & Others v. State of Chh^ sgarti & Others, which was considered and dec:ded by this Court on 20.01.2011, are identical. Thereafter, the said issue was re- considered in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others2, by this Court on 10.02.2011. Thus, the instant petition is squarely covered by the orders passed by this Court in Dhaniram & Others and Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others2. 2. in view ofthe submission made by learned counsei appearing for the parties, this petition is disposed of in terms of, the orders passed in Dhaniram & Others and Virendra Das Manikpuri & Other^. Sd7- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge . ' W.P.(S) Nchv6798 of2010, decided on 20.1.2011 2W.P.(S) No. 7450 of 2010 , decided on 10.2.2011 ^ffWR