1 sast-40892.01 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL ST. NO.40892 OF 2001 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri S.G. Karandikar for the Appellants. ­­ CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 1ST DECEMBER, 2011 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Appellants. The challenge in the Second Appeal preferred by the original Defendant Nos.1 to 3 is to the concurrent decrees passed by the Courts below by which the Original Plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 and the fourth Defendants have been declared as the owners and possessors of the suit property. There are concurrent findings of fact recorded by both the Courts below on the basis of the orders passed by the authorities under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The Trial Court as well as the Appellate Court upheld the claim of title of the Plaintiffs and the fourth Defendant. 2 sast-40892.01 In view of the concurrent findings of fact, no interference is called for. No substantial question of law arises. The Second Appeal is dismissed. (A.S.OKA, J)