-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2675 OF 2009 Nandkumar Digambar Dhule and others ... Petitioners versus Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation and others ... Respondents Mr. N.R. Bubna for the petitioners. Mr. A.S. Rao for respondent Nos.1 to 4. Mr. V.S. Gokhale, A.G.P., for respondent No.5. Ms. Pratibha Borade, instructed by Mr. M.S. Kumthekar, for respondent Nos. 6 & 7. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATE: JUNE 07, 2010. P.C. By way of this petition, the petitioners, who are elected Councillors of Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation, have challenged the resolution passed by the State Government dated 14th January, 2009 as well as resolution Nos. 77 and 94 passed in the meetings dated 16th January, 2009 and 28th January, 2009 of General Body of the first Respondent. By the impugned resolutions, the Standing Committee was re-constituted in the light of the judgement of a Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 2564 of 2007. The said decision of the Division Bench was referred to the Full Bench and the Full Bench of this Court has upheld the view taken by the Division Bench. The said decision of the Full Bench is reported in 2010 (3) ALL MR 280. -2- 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners has frankly submitted that the decision of the Full Bench is against the present petitioners. He also further submitted that even otherwise the tenure of the Standing Committee is over and now a new Standing Committee has been constituted. In view of the aforesaid decision, the prayer made by the petitioners in this petition now cannot be granted. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he has challenged the legality of the meeting in which resolution Nos. 77 and 94 were passed by the General Body by which the Standing Committee was constituted by including respondent Nos. 6 and 7. However, since now the term of the Standing Committee is already over, the issue raised in this petition has become academic. The learned counsel for the petitioners is also not in a position to state that any cause of action still subsists. In view of the above, this petition has become infructuous and is disposed of as such. Notice discharged. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. R.M. SAVANT, J.