IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. M-37098 of 2011 Date of decision: 19.12.2011 Raju alias Raj Singh ..Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. **** AJAY TEWARI, J.(ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R. No. 92 dated 13.5.2011 registered under Section 302 IPC and Sections 25/54/59 of Arms Act, at Police Station Chandhut, District Palwal. On 12.12.2011 the following contention was noticed:- "Learned counsel has argued that the allegation against the petitioner is that he along wih two other persons supplied a country made pistol to an intermediary who further sold it to the main accused who shot his sister-in-law. The petitioner has no connection either with the intermediary or Mehar Chand or with the main accused". Learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana on instructions from A.S.I. Satbir Singh has accepted the chain of transactions involving the pistol but states that there is no evidence that the petitioner has no connection with the other accused persons. In this view of the matter, without going into the merits of the CRM No. M-37098 of 2011 -2- case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner appear before the Investigating Officer on 26.12.2011 between 10.00 AM to 4.00 PM and on any other date on which his presence is required by the Investigating Officer. The Investigating Officer shall release him on bail to his satisfaction subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (AJAY TEWARI) December 19, 2011 JUDGE Poonam(II)