IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 7th Day of July, 2010 Crl. Bail Application No. 638 of 2010 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Sachin S/O Seesh Ram R/O Village Lathardeva Sheikh P.S.Jhabreda Tehsil Roorkee District Haridwar ………….Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand. ………….Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 76 of 2009, Under Section: 304B I.P.C Police Station: Jhabreda District: Haridwar Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate, Holding Brief of Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate, with Mr. M.A.Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State. Applicant Sachin, who is in jail in connection with Case Crime No. 76 of 2009, relating to offence punishable Under Section 304B I.P.C., Police Station Jhabreda, District Haridwar has sought his release on bail. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for applicant submitted that appellant is husband of the deceased. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that there is no mention in the First Information Report what was the demand of dowry, by whom it was made, and when it was made. It is further pointed out that the marriage of the applicant with deceased was solemnized in the year 2002, and seven years have passed. It is further submitted that on behalf of the applicant that the post mortem report does not disclose any antemortem injury on the body of the deceased. It is mentioned in the Post Mortem Report that cause of death could not be ascertained. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view, that the applicant deserves bail. Bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Sachin be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt. 07.07.2010 NP