IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.1266 of 2010 1. KAILASH DUBEY, S/O LATE CHHABI NATH DUBEY 2. URMILA DEVI, W/O KAILASH DUBEY Versus STATE OF BIHAR **** /2/ 28.01.2010 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted under Sections 304B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. It has been submitted that the petitioners are parents-in-law of the deceased and even though Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code has been mentioned in the first information report, but, it would not be a case under Section 304B since the marriage had been performed in the year 1997, i.e., about more than twelve years ago and apart from suspicion there is no cogent material against the petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, who are in custody since 24.11.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Chand P.S. Case No. 15 of 2009 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua, on the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of each of the petitioners who will give an affidavit 2 giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and (ii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he/they fail(s) to do so on two given dates and delay(s) the trial in any manner then his/their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)