- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.2449 OF 2000 NO.2449 OF 2000 NO.2449 OF 2000. Bank of India. ..Plaintiffs. vs. Olympic Express & Ors. ..Defendants. .... None for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendants. .... CORAM CORAM CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 15TH JANUARY 2009 : 15TH JANUARY 2009 : 15TH JANUARY 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . On 10th September 2007, this suit had appeared before the Prothonotary and Senior Master for directions when the plaintiffs and their Advocates were absent. Since the defendants were also absent thought served, the suit was transferred to the list of "Undefended Suits". 2. On 12th January 2009, the learned Advocate appearing for the plaintiffs sought a day’s time and the matter was adjourned to 13th January 2009. On 13th January 2009, the suit came up under the caption "Undefended Suits for Ex-parte Decree", when, the plaintiffs and their Advocates were absent. The suit was, therefore adjourned to 15th January 2009 for dismissal. - 2 - 3. Today, the matter is shown under the caption "For dismissal", however, the plaintiffs and their Advocate are again absent. 4. In view thereof, it is clear that the plaintiffs are not interested in prosecuting the suit any further. The suit is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.] J.] J.]