5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR / 200^ V'n^\ .W.P.NO.51,^' / 2006 Q.|SS|ji<JUBsii»U Petitioner : Vijay Prasad Sahu, Aged about 32 years S/o Late Shri Mohar .- Sai Sahu, R/o Village - Bhatgaon, TehsU & Thana- Bilaigarh,Dist: Raipur-fC.G.). Respondents Versus -:1. ^^^ 'i.^"^^1'"" ...-••"" ^L" ...-••"" •••••"..^y\R^--"" :?>?^'' ^',&••••" Q0-''ocp ^ <WL*!!SH ^ff^^s 3. 4. 5. .-ri':slw'' usal->.. <!SS;ss:"S3(SiA. /s^i?^y%.. /y ^'^^'"''^^^ '% ?:• :^. .'"^^x ':'St^y^ t^,^ ? cr$a*^y "SiiS.a--„«£•.'•" State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Dist ; Raipur- The Director, Education Deptt, Raipur, Dist: Raipur (C.G.). The District Education Officer, Raipur-(C.G.) The Principle Govemment Middle School Salaunikala, Dist : Raipur-(C.G.) Block Education OfBcer, Bilaigarh, Dist: Raipur-fC.G.) State of Madhya Pradesh Through-Secretary Deptt, Vallabh Bhawan,Bhopal- (M.P.) Union of India Through - The Chief Secretary Department of Personal & Training & Public Grievajices (State Reorganiza.tion Cell) Shastri Marg, New Delhi M o 1-^ to WRIT PETITION U/A 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF- INDIA •^>^^c-aUh£j3etidoner. XI-HC-22 + 'yst •^l<41d'il, eTiiy'is. (°i<nit)^< ^WW ^KffWi^.Wf.^Z^ TV • ^••- ---j'--^^ .43 sn^r^ii R-li.'tl 311^1 wiRT'Hfiti <f y 311^1 TRITSRBfel 23-1-2006 Petitmner bv Shri Pawan Ke, Shri S.S. Rajput, Dy. Govt. j Ku. Shamula Siughai, Staaij With coiisent, heard finally.] This case relates to coiupa^ death of aa einployee serviag in tlj Leamed counsel for the pe| of tbe eniployee has occurred on| earlier, It is ftufher submitted No. 1322/2002 mvolviag the samf 't.KiIfi^'l-i 'cniRjT 4 -fsist <fa(rii< ^sifi^nsn^i ^hai-wani, Advocate. Mv. for the State. liag Coiiasel for the Urdon of India. isionate appouitinent consequent upon the eState. . titioner categoricaUy stated that, ftie deafh 19-5-2000 .i.e. after fliat in "batch of 1-11-1997 and not cases bearing W.P. ^ question orders have been passed by this Court on 20/12/2005. He pray^ that simUar orders inaybe passed in this case also. Leamed counsel for the S|tate does uot dispute fhe above fact and states that fhe State of Ghhatdsbarh has taken a decision to consider the cases of dependants of those ei(iployees who died on or after 1/11/1997 strictly in accordarice wifh fhe Ipolicy prevalent at fhat time. He however subxnits that four nionths tiaie fof issuiag necessaiy oiders inay be given. In view of fhe submissions|inade by leamed counsel appeanng for fhe parties, without expressiiig aay opiuion of fhis Court, ends ofju the State of Chhatfisgarh acad i decide the case of fhe petitioner fhe tiine of death of fhe eniployef lopinion on fhe uierits of the case, ia the ^tice will be served if a dircction is giveu to he aufhorities conceraed to consider aad ia accordance with the policy prevalent at concemed. If fhe petitioner found eUgible, appoiataient orders wfll be issu^d as early as possible pi^ferably wifhin 4 inonths froin the date of produi petitioner is also directed to rend niade clear fhat if any grievance reiaedv available under fhe law Court. Witii the aforesaid observai Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counse| order to fhe respondents for coi The Itis ;tion/receipt of a copy of fhis order. erdue co-operation to fhe aufhorities. stfll idnains, fhe petitioiier inay avail the includuig flliag of fhe petition before this ions, this petition sitaads disposed of. who witl be obHged to colniiiunicate fhe )liance. Sdf- pakhruddin Judge [Tft^'^R^£T