: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.861 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1032 OF 2008 Sunder Corporation ..Appellants. Vs. Dr.Adithi nee Sushma Sunil Tawade ..Respondent. Mr.N.V.Walawalkar, Senior Counsel i/b.M/s.R.M.G. Law Associates for the Appellants. Mr.H.S.S.Murthy for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 11TH DECEMBER, 2008 DATED : 11TH DECEMBER, 2008 DATED : 11TH DECEMBER, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : Admit. Heard finally. 2. I see no reason to interfere with the ad-interim order at this stage. The Notice of Motion is yet to be heard. 3. It is however made clear that the Respondent shall not claim any equities on the basis of what may be done upto the stage of the hearing of the Notice of Motion. 4. It is further clarified that the refusal of ad-interim order shall not entitle the Respondent to : 2 : carry out any activities which are otherwise not permissible in law looking to the nature of the premises or otherwise. 5. It is further clarified that in the event of the society being formed, the refusal of the ad-interim orders shall not be a ground for prohibiting the society to resist the enforcement of the undertaking executed by the Respondents. 6. All contentions of the parties are kept open. ***