IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5090 of 2006 RAMESH PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 3.11.2010 Petitioner was appointed on the post of a constable since his height was indicated to be 177 cm. When he went for training and was re-measured his height was turned down to 172.5 cm. Appointment was obtained by misrepresentation or manipulation in the record for whatever consideration and reasons. Since it is not the case of the petitioner that any person less than 177 cm came to be appointed along with him, his pleading now that in the second list there are some people who have been appointed with the height of 171 cm has no meaning because his removal was with regard to the recruitment made along with the rest of the other eligible candidates. Since the petitioner was only recruited and a trainee, therefore, no departmental proceeding as such was required to be held in view of the glaring fact which emerges on re-measurement. Writ has no merit. It is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)