IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. W.J.C. No.831 of 2010 NIRMALA DEVI. Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ----------- 2. 9.2.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though the charge sheet has been submitted in connection with Jogbani P.S. Case No.80 of 2003 under sections 498A and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, but the chargesheeted accused are not being arrested. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State in which it is stated that despite the efforts made by the police, Arun Kumar Mandal (respondent no.8) is not being arrested. It has further been stated that on inquiry it was learnt that respondent no.8 has become a “Satsangi”and left his village ten years back. Considering the rival submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter. However, it will be open for the petitioner to take appropriate steps as permissible under the Code of Criminal Procedure. The writ application stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)