IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 6060 of 2008 Between: 1 V.M. Mahesh S/o. Late V.H. Madhav Rao Rep. by his Power of Atttorney V.M. Mukesh S/o. Late V.H. Madhav Rao, aged 42 yrs, R/o. H.No. 75/A, Doveton Bazar, Bolarum, Secunderabad. 2 V.M. Sailesh S/o. Late V.H. Madhav Rao Rep. by his Power of Atttorney V.M. Mukesh S/o. Late V.H. Madhav Rao, aged 42 yrs, R/o. H.No. 75/A, Doveton Bazar, Bolarum, Secunderabad. 3 V.M. Dinesh S/o. Late V.H. Madhav Rao Rep. by his Power of Atttorney V.M. Mukesh S/o. Late V.H. Madhav Rao, aged 42 yrs, R/o. H.No. 75/A, Doveton Bazar, Bolarum, Secunderabad. 4 S. Mahita W/o. Late S. Sai Kumar D/o. Late V.H. Madhav Rao, Rep. by his Power of Atttorney V.M. Mukesh S/o. Late V.H. Madhav Rao, aged 42 yrs, R/o. H.No. 75/A, Doveton Bazar, Bolarum, Secunderabad. 5 Jayanthi W/o. Venkatesh D/o. Late V.H. Madhav Rao Rep. by his Power of Atttorney V.M. Mukesh S/o. Late V.H. Madhav Rao, aged 42 yrs, R/o. H.No. 75/A, Doveton Bazar, Bolarum, Secunderabad. 6 V.M. Mithila D/o. Late V.H. Madhav Rao Rep. by his Power of Atttorney V.M. Mukesh S/o. Late V.H. Madhav Rao, aged 42 yrs, R/o. H.No. 75/A, Doveton Bazar, Bolarum, Secunderabad. 7 V.M. Kumuda W/o. Late V.H. Madhav Rao Rep. by his Power of Atttorney V.M. Mukesh S/o. Late V.H. Madhav Rao, aged 42 yrs, R/o. H.No. 75/A, Doveton Bazar, Bolarum, Secunderabad. 8 V.H. Keshav Rao S/o. Late V. Hanumantha Rao Rep. by his Power of Atttorney V.M. Mukesh S/o. Late V.H. Madhav Rao, aged 42 yrs, R/o. H.No. 75/A, Doveton Bazar, Bolarum, Secunderabad. 9 V.M. Mukesh S/o. Late V.H. Madhav Rao ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Director, Survey And Land Records, A.P. Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Secunderabad Division, Secunderabad. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Tirumalgiri Mandal Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents herein to take appropriate action on the representation dt. 9-10-2006 (Received by the Respondents 1,3 & 4 on 16-10-2006 and Respondent No. 2 on 17-10-2006) wherein the petitioners herein requested the respondents to arrange for survey of the land in Survey No. 59/2 (old) Corresponding to new Survey No. 119 of Macha Bolarum Village, Tirumalgiri Mandal, Hyderabad Distric Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.V.SESHA SAI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioners are seeking a direction to the respondents to take action on the representation dated 9.10.2006 made by the petitioners seeking to survey the land in survey No.59/2 (old) corresponding to new survey No.119 of Macha Bolarum Village, Tirumalgiri Mandal, Hyderabad District. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and at their request the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. It is the case of the petitioners that their great grandfather owned an extent of 3800 square yards of land in old survey No.59/2 of Macha Bolarrum Village of Tirumalgiri Mandal, Hydeabad and after his death the petitioners herein inherited the said property. It is stated that the extent of the old survey No.59/2 was shown as Ac.4.00 as per khasrapahani and the said survey number now corresponds to new survey No.119 and only Ac.3.07 guntas is shown in the said survey number and since the land belonging to them is not shown in the new survey number, the petitioners made several representations to the respondents to rectify the mistake and to arrange for survey of the land, in vein. While the matters stood thus, the Revenue Divisional Officer vide Memo dated 26.12.2006 gave an endorsement that the petitioners should approach the Mandal Revenue Officer, Tirumalgiri Mandal. Thereafter, it is stated that the petitioners approached the Mandal Revenue Officer several times but no action has been taken on their representations dated 9.10.2006 and 17.10.2006. Hence this writ petition. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for the respondents, submits that since the petitioners have already made representations to the authorities, necessary directions may be issued to them to consider and dispose of the representations of the petitioners. In view of the above, without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to take necessary action on the representation dated 9.10.2006 of the petitioners to arrange for the survey of the land in S.No.59/2 (old) corresponding to new S.No.119 of Macha Bolarum Village, Tirumalgiri Mandal, Hyderabad District, as expeditiously as possible. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.24.3.2008 msv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Director, Survey And Land Records, A.P. Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Secunderabad Division, Secunderabad. 4 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Tirumalgiri Mandal Secunderabad. 5. 2CCs to Govt.Pleader for Revenue, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad 6. 2CD copies