hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7397 OF 2009 Ms. Amruta More ... Petitioner Versus The State of Mah. And Ors. ... Respondents Mr. N.N. Kandekar for the Petitioner. Mr. S.N. Patil, A.G.P. For R.Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. R.A. Malandkar for R.No. 5. Mr. R.V. Govilkar for R. No. 6. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & K.K. TATED JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 11, 2009 P.C. It is the case of the Petitioners that his father has been issued caste validity certificate and his caste claim is pending before the committee since 2006. The Petitioner has been admitted against the reserved seat. The Petitioner as a S.T. Candidate is entitled to free seat. By communication of 4.11.2009 the Petitioner has been called upon by the college to pay fees as per existing rules. The grievance of the Petitioner is that the because his caste claim has not been considered, her has been called upon to pay the fees which otherwise not payable by the Petitioner. Notice waived on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. For the order to be passed, notice on Respondent No. 5 and 6 dispensed with. Considering the controversy, Respondent No. 3 is directed to consider and dispose of the Petitioner’s pending caste claim within eight weeks from today. In the meantime, Respondent No. 5 is directed not to demand fees from the Petitioner. In the event the Petitioner’s claim is rejected, then the Petitioners will be bound to pay the fees. With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (K.K. TATED, J.) (F,I. REBELLO,J.)