1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 987 of 2011 Mr. Anand Raaghunath Tambe & Another ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Ms.Latika Navlekar a/w. Hemant Jangam for Petitioners. Mr.Dedia APP for State Mr. Sushant Narkar for Respondent No.2 CORAM:- R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED:- 14th JULY, 2011. P.C. 1. The respondent no.2 had filed FIR with Navghar Police Station, Mumbai, namely F.I.R. 114 of 2010 against petitioners under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code. 2. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent no.2 states before this Court that petitioner on one hand and the respondent no. 2 on the other have settled the dispute between them and that is how 2 the petitioner and the respondent would like that the matter be quashed and and that the F.I.R be quashed. 3. I have perused the text of the F.I.R as well as the grounds on which the F.I.R. is sought to be quashed. In my view it would be proper to quash the F.I.R. rather than call upon the parties to go on with criminal case when the dispute between the parties is settled. 4. Learned Counsel for the respondent no.2 in presence of his client has reaffirmed his client’s desire before this Court today to put an end to the matter. In view of the above, following order is passed to dispose of the petition. ORDER i) Petition is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (d). ii) Bail bonds of both the petitioners are cancelled. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) 3