IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11488 of 2008 AMIT KUMAR, son of Shri Parma Yadav, resident of Village-Belhari, P.S. Doriganj, District- Saran(Chapra)……. ……..Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar Patna, 2. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, 3. The Director Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, 4. The District Magistrate, Saran(Chapra), 5. The Commissioner, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Saran, 7. The Block Development Officer, Sadar Block, Saran, 8. The Block Education Extention Officer Sadar Block, Saran, 9. Shri Heman Rai, S/o Purbi Balua, Post Kaus Diara, P.S. Gultenganj. The Mukhia Gram Panchayat Raj Musepur, Saran, 10. Prithivi Nath Yadav S/o Raghunath Pd. Yadav, resident of Village-Sonbarsa Ke Tola, P.S. Manjhi, Saran. The Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Musepur, Saran, 11. The Head Master, Primary School Pipra Tola, Musepur, Saran….. …..Respondents. …………… For the Petitioner: Mr. Gyan Prakash, Advocate. For respondent No.9: Mr. Devendra Nr. Singh, Advocate. For respondent No.10: Mr.Binod Murari Mishra,Advocate. For respondent No.11: Mr. Abhay Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State: : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, AC to SC-VIII. ……………….. 2 8 22.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, for the State and respondent No.9, 10 and 11. It is a common ground that now the Appellate Authority constituted by the State Government under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Sart) Niyamvali, 2006 (as amended by Amendment Act, 2008) is functional and, thus, there is efficacious alternative forum available to the petitioner for consideration of redressal of his grievance. In view of the submissions made above and availability of the efficacious alternative forum for consideration of matters relating to the dispute in question, this writ application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate application before the concerned Appellate Authority. In case, such an application is filed by the petitioner within one month, the Appellate Authority will consider the same alongwith the documents annexed therewith on its own merit in accordance with law and after hearing the parties concerned will pass a speaking order, preferably, within the time prescribed under the Rules for the said purpose. Sanjay-II ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)