IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36976 of 2009 1. PHULLO YADAV S/O THAKO YADAV R/OVILL SONEPUR, P.S.ROSERA, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR 2. CHANDRA SHEKHAR YADAV S/O THAKO YADAV R/OVILL SONEPUR, P.S.ROSERA, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR 3. RUDAL YADAV S/O SURAJ YADAV R/OVILL SONEPUR, P.S.ROSERA, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 18.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The defence of the petitioners in a Police case under Sections 307 and other provisions of the Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Explosive Substance Act is of a land dispute and a fight with regard to toddy drinking, with a case and counter case. It is fairly acknowledged that bombs were also lobed during the occurrence which is alleged against the petitioner also. This Court considers the same as sufficient justification to deny them the privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioners shall be considered on its own merits, without being prejudiced by the present order. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)