FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directios and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 3 CA/8413/2011 ,In FA/1594/2011 GANPAT AMBAJI MOHOLKAR VERSUS YUVRAJ LAXMAN KUMBHAR AND ORS ... Advocate for applicant : Mr. C.J. Sabnis Advocate for Respondents 1 to 3 & 6 : Mr. R.K. Ashtekar ... CORAM : A. V. POTDAR, J. Dated: November 23, 2011 ... PER COURT :- 1. By present civil application, plaintiff / appellant whose suit for specific performance of contract, in the alternate for refund of earnest money, was partly allowed by the lower court, has prayed for grant of relief of injunction directing the defendants not to alienate the suit property during pendency of the appeal. 2. Section 52(C) of the Transfer of Property Act is very clear on the point of transaction during pendency of the proceeding before the Civil Court. In the light of this, in case there is any alienation of the suit property during pendnecy of the proceeding, the person who will acquire the property during pendency of this appeal will be binding by the judgment and decree passed in the first appeal. In the FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directios and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS light of this, prayer in the civil application stands rejected. Civil application stands disposed of accordingly. ( A. V. POTDAR, J. ) ... dyb