,.\^0^:5^ ^^.^ ^^••"•^>1"" %E^8l£BEKSN ^^ \^ ^r ^••"" ^^> ^ ^ / BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ( CHHATTISGARH ) W.P,(S)No. rb^0 /2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS yi <^ Jagdish Ram Sahu, aged about 35 years, S/o Topsingh Sahu, R/o Nawapara (Araarpur) P.0. Ramhepur, Tahsil Pandariya, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through-Its Secretary Panchayt & Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Executive Officer^\ ••<•• ^- Janpad Panchayat PandaPiya, ^ Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) / *' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •^: ^ '.^ ^ l^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATfISGARH Al'BILASFUR rs PETITIQNER RE8PONDENT8 WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3810 of2010 Jagdish Ram Sahu. VER8US State ofChhattisgarh & Anofher. WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS'mUHON OF INDIA SB: Hon»bleShri Satish K. Aemhotri, J. Present: Ms. Sofia Khajn, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govenmient Advocate for the State/ respondcnt No. 1. Shii B.P.Banjare, Advocate appearing on behatfof Smt. Hamida Siddique, Advocate for tfie petitioner. ORDER(ORAL) (Passed on 21st day of Febmary, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearmg for tiae petitioner, on mstructions, seeks permission of fhis Court to withdraw this petition wifh liberty to file arepresentation before the respondent authorities. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for ofher side have no objection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn witb the aforestated observations, ifso advised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^ Amit