IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU THURSDAY, THE 15TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 26TH MAGHA 1928 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 833 of 1998 ----------------------------- CRA.15/1995 of SESSIONS COURT, KOZHIKOE CC.393/1992 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, PERAMBRA .................... REVN. PETITIONER: ------------------ EAKKOTT MOIDU, AGED 43 YEARS, P.O. PALERI TOWN,VIA.KUTTIADI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.VATHSALAN SRI.P.M.SAJI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1.C.P.SIVADASAN, S/O. KANARAN CHETTIAR, CHATHOTH PARAMBIL HOUSE, P.O. PERAMBRA, KOYILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. HE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R1BY ADV. SRI.K.A.SALIL NARAYANAN R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTORMR.AMJAD ALI THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-2-2007 , THE COURT on the SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON CRL.M.P.NO. 4219 OF 1998 IN CRL.R.P.NO. 833 OF 1998 DISMISSED. 15-2-2007 SD/-K.R.UDAYABHANU, JUDGE TRUE COPY P.S.TO JUDGE K.R. UDAYABHANU, J. CRL.R.P.NO.833 of 1998 DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2007 ORDER The revision petitioner stands convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. On a consideration of the evidence adduced in the matter and on the concurrent findings of the courts below, I find there is no ground to interfere. The Crl.revision petition is dismissed. K.R.UDAYABHANU, JUDGE ks.