IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 19TH MAGHA 1932 RP.No. 1132 of 2010() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WA.1720/2010 Dated 11/10/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT/2ND RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------------- THE CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIOER, NEW DELHI. BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE SMT.T.N.GIRIJA, SC,EPF ORGANISATION RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/RESONDENT ------------------------------------------------ 1. FEDERAL BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, ALUVA-683 101,REP.BY ITS ASST.GENERAL MANAGER SRI.C.V.JOHN. 2. SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, THRISSUR 680 001,REP.BY ITS ASST.GENERAL MANAGER SRI.T.M.SUNNY. 3. CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, THRISSUR 680 020, REP.BY ITS ASST.GENERAL MANAGER SRI.A.RAJMOHAN. 4. NEDUNGADI BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, KOZHIKODE 673 001, REP.BY ITS ASST.GENERAL MANAGER SRI.K.DAMODARAN. 5. DHANALAKSHMI BANK LIMITED, CENTRAL OFFICE, THRISSUR 680 001, REP.BY ITS ASST.GENERAL MANAGER SRI.M.P.S.SHARMA. 6. LORD KRISHNA BANK LIMITED, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, KOCHI 682 017, REP.BY ITS ASST.GENERAL MANAGER SRI.PRAKASH C.CHANDY. R.P.NO.1132/2010 7. BIJU.P.L, DRIVER CUM PEON,CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE,THRISSUR 680 020. 8. MINI C.V,TYPIST CUM CLERK,CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE,THRISSUR 680 020. 9. N.C.JOSHY,SUSTAFF,DHANALAKSHMI BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, THRISSUR 680 001. 10. T.V.VAIDYANATHAN,DHANALAKSHMI BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, THRISSUR 680 001. 11. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA,REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,MINISTRY OF LABOUR, SRAM MANTHRALAYA, NEW DELHI. MR.SAJI VARGHESE, ASG THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ---------------------------------- R.P.No.1132 of 2010 in WA No.1720 of 2010 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 8th day of February, 2011 O R D E R Ramachandran Nair, J. This Review Petition is filed challenging the merit of the decision taken. Since we have declined to condone delay, the Writ Appeal got dismissed not on merits but on account of order declined to condone delay. If the petitioner has a case on merits, it is for the petitioner to file review petition against the judgment of the learned Single Judge. This Review Petition is dismissed with the above observation. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) (K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE) jg