IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 1434 of 1999 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 4.8.1999 In WP No. 5276 of 1999 on the file of the High Court.) Between: The Superintendent of Police, Mahabubnagar District and another ..... APPELLANTS AND Basu Bheemaiah and another .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. N. Narasimha Rao . The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN W.A.NO. 1434 OF 1999 ORDER: (Per Smt. T. Meena Kumari, J) Heard learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the appellants and the learned counsel for the writ petitioners/respondents. This writ appeal is filed against the order dated 4.8.1999 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in WP No. 5276 of 1999 which was filed questioning the action of the appellants/respondents in continuing the dossier sheets (rowdy sheets) against the writ petitioners. The rowdy sheets were opened against the writ petitioners in the year 1992 and renewed from time to time upto 1999. This renewal was made by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gadwal by making an endorsement on the letters written by the Sub-Inspector of police-appellant/2nd respondent. The learned Single Judge, after going through the relevant records, observed that the Deputy Superintendent of Police had simply endorsed on the letters addressed by the appellant-2nd respondent and mechanically renewed the rowdy sheets against the writ petitioners without recording reasons and without application of mind. The learned Single Judge accordingly directed that the rowdy sheets shall not be retained. We have gone through the record and we do not find any ground to interfere with the order of the learned single Judge, as it does not suffer from any infirmity. The period of rowdy sheets had already expired. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J _________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J Dt.10.6.2008 KR ........REGISTRAR To 1. 2.2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WA { }