1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13608 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 29523 OF 2010 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. DATED : 26.11.2010 1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 114 days in filing the Second Appeal. Heard Shri Solshe, learned Counsel for the applicant and Shri D.K. Kulkarni, learned Counsel for respondent No.1. 2. Shri Kulkarni resists the application on the ground that no sufficient cause has been stated. The grounds stated are false. The applicant is intentionally avoiding to specify dates and particulars. In absence of the same this application cannot be considered. 3. The Second Appeal involved rights of the applicant in an immovable 2 property. The applicant has stated that he could not get knowledge of the impugned judgment and decree and it was only in the month of May, 2010, he tried to contact the advocate, but he was out of station. The delay was caused as initially the advocate was not available and subsequently after the certified copies were handed over to the applicant in third week of September, 2010, the applicant could file the appeal. 4. The expression sufficient cause has to be liberally construed. The delay is not inordinate. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned. The Civil Application is allowed. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J.] snk/2010/NOV10/ca13608.10