,Mec? i / tiul IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0'^~^^-s/2005 PETITIONER ' -r»y -o jf ^.A^'/ r^y/ ^C//M/ ./^ ^•"^v RESPONDENTS Lucy Moitra, Aged about 55 years, W/o. Late Shyama Kant Moitra, R/o. G-5 B.T.I. Colony, Shankamagar, Raipur, Lecturer Directorate of Public Instruction PIET) Shankamagar, Raipur (C.G). VERSUS ./'4. StateofChhattisgarh, 'Nu-ough the Secretary, Education 85 Training Insdtute, Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan Raipur (C.G.j. /^2. Director, State Educational Research & Training Council (Rajya Saishik Anusandhan or Prashikshan Parisad) Raipur (C.G.) 3. Principal, District Education & Trafcning Institute, Shankamagar, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ORDER/DIRECTIONS IN NATUREOF WRIT OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR LIKE NATURE ,-A '•-„? 1 .4, PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER The petitioner is a citizen of India, holds a degree in y ','>> <""'."5>'" .^ c-.^ - A^M.A. English with Bachelor of Education. The petitioner w ©'' at present is posted under respondentno.3. She is XI-HC-78 fli+icitt^n^ \} l^^i<<|)rt«,tml<i*l<»;Reil"M^ .tA!..P.-...$.^.f.^... <-^200S~ sii^Tg'rR-fi* a8|T3lA?tri>tfi<t> 3n^?Tq5TEp{'iflrfg?%) i.2 W.P.N0.521S/2005 Shri Koshore Bhaduri, Shri Akhil Agrawal,Panel Heard. The grievanee of the ps have been made in the service 2005-2006. The submission of learr these entries are without ony the authorities concerned. For the present, learn^ that this pe+ition may be dispo^ filea detailed representation I) competent authori+y may be the stipulated period granted 4 This limited prayer, ma4 is riot opposed by the State coj The prayer is allowed. If so advised, the petiti raising ail his gr-ieyances re) service book before the concet coljnsel tpjifCTtil'1 *ii*<»Y^flsi3•((ui-«;i>i ^Slf^tTSn^OT for the petitioner. Lgwyer for the State. ttitioner is that some adverse entries records of the petitioner for the year ed counsel for the petitioner is that )asis and haye been malafidely made by d counse] for the petitioner submits ^ed.of with liberty to the petitioner to efore the competent authority and the irected to dispose of the same within •y this Cour't. e by learned counsel for the petitioner insel. mer may fi!e a detaiied representation, |arding adverse entries mode in the •ned authority alongwith acopy of this '!? XI-HC-78 '3cc|T-qiqiWt|,t»tTl<9<is;fartray< TPi^F^TT^ 3n^9Tq?R>(<jc|?j6|^) ^200 ai^?T®iRrii<b a'aiT3I1^?T*1i<h inp /• '^ •o €^ B^ITSR^lfel 3Ilt?T order and copy of writ petitii and if.such a reoresenti •r:?l->'<'lji'S^^f;5--'-\\ " '-r; -- ^hall-'con.sider ea.ch and every dispose of tde same as early a; eight weeks from the date representation. With the above firidlly disposed of .at th is stage Consequently, AA.W.P.No for urgent hearing stands disp^ Certified copy as per rul n within a period of one month from ^ition is filed, the concemed authority oint raised by the petitioner and shall possible preferably within a period pf of filing/receipt of the aforesaid observ^itions/directions, this petitJQn stands 'OKito'fli liinV^'Js'^l'fRl'l-gl't ^>3l)^T3II^?T ^ 4218/2005 and I.A.No. 9078/2Q05 jsedof. ^s; 1 Sd/- SunilKumarSinha Judge