1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1155 OF 2009 M/s. Triofab India Pvt. Ltd. .... Appellants Vs. Mrs. Veena Sunil Kumar Jha & Anr. .... Respondents Shri Rahul S. Singh for the Appellants. None for the Respondents. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JUNE 15, 2010 P.C: This appeal is directed against an order passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane rejecting the appellants/plaintiffs application at Exhibit-5 in Special Civil Suit No.827 of 2007. The appellants had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with respondent NO.1, the owner of the properties whereby three properties were to be purchased by the appellants. Out of these three properties, one is admittedly already sold to M/s. Royal Air Con Pvt. Limited even before the plaintiffs filed the suit. The learned counsel for the appellants points out 2 that this is not an admitted fact and even the property sold to M/s. Royal Air Con Pvt. Limited was sold after the suit was filed. The appellants have in fact filed Civil Suit No.662 of 2008 in respect of the transfer to M/s. Royal Air Con Pvt. Limited. Be that as it may, since the learned counsel for the appellants states that none of the properties have been transferred before the suit was filed, the appellants are duly protected by Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act and it does not need any additional protection by any order of this Court or by the Civil Court. All transfers which are effected during the pendency of the suit do not bind the plaintiffs and if eventually the decree is put to execution, the person claiming through the defendants also cannot resist such claim. Therefore, it cannot be said that any irreparable loss would be caused to the appellants, warranting issuance of an injunction. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)