,. !f WK^M^ dT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE 1-IIGM COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 4-'717 72004 PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^^ 2- ^^ ^y^ ^C. DAS, son of Late M .5. Das, aged about 41 years, oceupation - Service, posted, as Constable, R.P.F. S.E.C.R., Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Union of Ihdia through : the SecFetary, Ministry of Railway, New Delhi. The Chief Securify Commissioner, R.P.F. .Soufh Eastern Central Railway, Bilaspur(Chhattisgarh) , ^ ^•° 3. The Divisional Security Commissioner, R.P.F. South Eastern Central ,. Railway, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE c226 .R/W ARTICLE 227' OF THE CONSTITU-TL0N OF INDIA FQR ISSUANGSB OF V»RIT!•aN THE "Ni'VTURE or ERT'IORA^MANDAMUS..PRQI-IIBFFI©NAND.Gffit-lBR^StJITABLEWRITOR UTS. OR.DBR OR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIREGTIQNS: 'S^^i^dAi,.^ M...:.^Msi. 03-01-2005 Shri SiishflDubey, SlmVinayHarit, AppBcation for urgent heanng i^ Heard. Slni Dubey, leamed counsel| petitioner is serving in Railway control' of regiondent Nb.3/IMvisicina^ sufenuts diat flie wifeof flie petitionCT] woridlig as an Assistaiit TeaGher, Bilaspur. He also SulMiutslliafwde flle attachment of the petitioner has Outpost Pen<ha. He also subnut^ rqtresaitation (Aimexure-P/5) befor^ same is pendmg eonsideration. It is (Annexure-P/4) and clause-iv flle Clause-ivof11iePoKeyisreleva}it Ja4pad calder i "^WKereone«t^K anddKeotitarlidoH^\ The 'Railway servai^ station/pJace in ffie territorial Jurisdiction\ his/her spouse 'fatts. ^ froni the Railway serv^nt cf l.he spouse 'for fu^ ppsting af-the raitwe^ may.te^orwarSedti^ ~~\ sympatheSc CQnsideration. ^Pd.o^'! ^n^K'ii'^f ^^:1[Ri'^R ^-iffipisn^f^.^ -^ eounselfor.lfaeiwtitixaiet. ^ Standmg cou^sel fi)r fha Railways. gentlifianng i^aflowed. for flie petitioner subimts fhat flie Prottction Force as Constable (Bider Ihe [ Seeurity Coamussioner, He further Inaniely Stitt. Madhu Hemfata^Das, is Primaiy School, Sitgitti, District datedy2-t0-2004 (Aanesure-P/1) |>eeri wifhdrawn arid he send back to fliat the petitioitfit has submitted the respondent authorities but flie ^jontended Ifaat accoriing to the policy petitu|iner camlot be transfetred^ andquotedbelow: ; spouses:is;ttTaihvff serwait ^asatKserwce: •s^o^ ^te ,^os<ed ^d( ife fSfalway/Divisiqn./PU m whose' the place/stdte cf fiostmg af^ it is natpossfble, if a reqUest toiheGontrolling Authority v/her pcisting at the place af servant is received, fhesame: the cvncerr^ auffifft'i^ joi- Gi^J—FS/350—12, •^-- 3'^;:3t!3iRra,'-'STrt^iTg;,^ ^f^l^-t^ Gcwri ? •V ^i^lt;i*(1l i4k^d? ^f'fesl' :rf;3R^Tt , i? SlfiiH CT^I ' i; :" Having ebflsidered and witlicjut expressing aiy Qpnrion on Ae merite of^lfae cme, jirllie opuuon. of fius < dnBct^^@vento te Competent a^ffiority of fhe respondente to deeide Ae representation (Aimexure^5) siriMi4tted by'lfte petitionffl; oniits own merits in accordance withlaw. ; ^ Eeanled GOunsd fer Ifac petiljioner subnutsAat 1he petifioner has aot heeareIu^d^He'pi^that^peSti^nermaytedtowedto Ih view of^ statenK^ma^ byle;Bt c0imselforffie:petitioner,it is directed fhat ifthe petitionerllas contmue 131 .Sis'teptesa'Ss^sja, w petitioner Uas alTeai^f1)eenrelieved, to rejojnatlhe eaiiier place pfprotmj Witfa tfae aforesaid observatioj |not been reKeved IK! may; b^aUowed to Idecided; fl is made dear Ifaat if ffie l^his order'wffl not entide the petit^^ flns petition stands<faposed^o£ Partiesareeatitledccatifiedcd |ourt, ends ofjustice wiBi beservedifa Consequefltty,M.W.P.No.50p8/2004also8tand8disposedof. pyofthisorderasperrules. sd/- Fakhrudeiin Judge GijPR.I—FS/350—12aoOO—50.000. ^.^-