IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 3132 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 3132 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 3132 OF 2007 Nashik Municipal Corporation.... Petitioner versus Vijay Madhukar Bhagare...... Respondent. Ms. Deepa Metwankar & M.L.Patil for the petitioner Shri Rupesh Bobade for respondent. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 23RD APRIL, 2007 DATED; 23RD APRIL, 2007 DATED; 23RD APRIL, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ petition is identical with the one which has been decided by this court by an order dated 4-4-2007 being W.P.No.5240 of 2007. Hence I pass the same order. 2. The present respondent no.1 filed a ULP complaint before the Industrial Court, Nashik and prayed for regularisation in service. 54 similarly situated workers had claimed the same relief by filing writ petition in this Court vide W.P. No.6260/2000 and this court had disposed of the writ petition by directing the Corporation to forward the proposal for regularisation of said 54 employees and the State Government as well was directed to consider the said proposal within given time frame. I am informed that the State Government has sanctioned creation of the said posts with a view to grant regularisation to the said 54 workmen. The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record the Government Resolution dated 14-5-2002 which relates to creation of posts of wiremen and helpers who were employed in the electrical division of the Corporation. The said government Resolution is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Following the course adopted by the High Court, the Industrial Court as well has passed an order on similar lines directing the Corporation to forward the proposal to the State Government with a view to ensure regularisation of service of the complaint, as 54 similarly situated employees are already granted regularisation in service pursuant to the order passed by the High Court and consequential decision taken by the State Government. As the case of the respondent is at par with the 54 employees who have filed writ petition, respondent herein is entitled to parity. Perused the order passed by the Industrial Court. Same does not call for any interference. Hence writ petition is summarily dismissed. ...