HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH A ILASPUR Single Bench : Ho‘ ’ le Sh' il‘ o sh h J. Qg‘miggl §§1§§iog No, 28g 9f ZOOS Heard on admission. ‘2. The petitioner No.1 - Smt. Rukmani is aggrieved by the order dated 27.01 .2006 passed in M.J.C. No. 8812005 by the Family Court, Korba whereby while rejecting the prayer of the petitioner No.1 - Smt. Rukmani for grant of maintenance, a sum of Rs.500/- was awarded to the petitioner No.2, minor child. aged 7 months. of the respondent. 3. ‘ Learned counsel for the petitioners did not dispute that the petitioner No.1 .—;Smt. Rukmani is not the iegally married wife of the respondent. ,4. L In this View of the matter, in view of the decision of this Court in Criminal Revision No.264 of 2006 on 05‘“ May, 2009 (Ramkumar v. Smt. Agglicams , 1. Smt. Rukmani @ Suniia. Wlo Murari Agrawal, Aged about 22 yeais. 2. Yash Kumar Agrawal, S/o Murari Agrawal, Aged about 7 months, throagh natural guardian — applicant No.1. V s Both are R/o Laxmanban Tank, Near ~ ' Kali Temple, Korba, Tahsil & Dist Korba (C.G.) ‘ Venus Murari Agrawal, S/o late Ramnlwas Agrawal, aged about 24 years. R/o Lalghat, Balco Nagar, P.S.Balco. CR Tahsil & Distt. Korba (C.G.) l ACT, 1984 Present : YCO RT§ i Ms. Sunita Jain, counsel for the applicant. ORAL OR R (Passed on1 June,2009) SI @ Meena Sahu), order of rejection of the prayer of the peutioner No.1 cannot be faulted with. So far as the grant of maintenance of award of Rs.500!- to the minor child is concemed. i am of the considered opinion that in view of the order passed by this Court in Criminai Revision No. 417 of 2006 on 18‘“ March, 2009 (Murari Agrawal vs. Smt. Rukhamani @ Sunita), no interference is called for in exercise of revisionaljurisdiction. 5. This Criminal Revision being devoid of merit is dismissed at the stage i i Sdl- l Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh ‘“ Judge of admission. 3