HC-78 ;3^T ;:ZTTSIT?5?T, tPT^1<-l'll<o, Rrtl'dy^ —. ^^^°^S1Q. *ii*i<?»ia?TT^ 3TT^$T q^P ((jcli^<sl«^) ^l 2066 3TT^^T<PTf^Trcp cT^T3TF^$T(CTtcp FN ^cfT^R :?rf^?f 3TT^$T pE'n'noNER Smt. Joshi, Durg(C(|}) ^' Vii|nla Sharma, aged 44 years, Wife of G.S. )uperintendent, Bal Sanrakchhan Griha, RESPONDBNTS 1. 2. 3. 4. Director d Director d (MP) Writ Petttion under Artidl cpi^Icl>41Ti +ii+ic^T^'f^ucl ^<FJI^-CII< ?l>3rf^T31T^?T ersus State Gov|ernment of Chhattisgarh, Through | the Secretary, Mahila Bal Vikas Departmelnt, Ministry, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) f Mahila and Bal Vikas, Raipur (CO) >f Mahila Bal Vikas Sanchalanaya, Bhopal Zila Kaiy^kram Adhikari, Mahila Evam Bal Vikas, Durg (CG) s 226 ofthe €^>nstitutionoflndia 8.B. Hontble Shri Dhirendra Btlshra, J. 25.11.2008 Mr. Somkant Verma, coiijnisel for fhe petitioner. Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Dy AG ^ith Ms.Sunita Jam, PL for the State. This petidon is directe^ a^amst the order of Aunexure P/l, whereby a sum of Rs. 1,34,405/|- has been ordered to be recovered £rom salaiy of fhe petitioner on mojafhly iastaUment of Rs,2,000/- on tiie basis ofalleged overpayment to| the petitioner, Learaed counsel for fhe betitioner submits that fhe above order has been passed wifhout aay ^how cause notice to fhe petittoner aud wifhout affordmg aaiy opportun|ity ofhearing to her. He fiirfh.er subimts that he is not pressiag fhis pe^ition at this stage, however, he may be penmtted to ffle a fresh repr^sentation before the respondent No.4 against the above recovery, wh^o may be furfher directed to decide the same wifhin a spect&ed period|aad m the meanwhile, fhe recovery, as contemplated by fhe impugned|order, inay be stayed. ^^^<^;1 ^3wT;:qTOTc!RfT, u>-al^<l<»,Iqrtl^^ *1Hrtl a?Tf^? ' 'c ^' '" • """ ^F^ 200^, 3TT^?T q^zp (^clljd^) OT^^Tc^Tf^TTcp c^IT3Tr^$T^^tcp ^INNN" ^/ Leamed counsel for fhe S files a representation for redres^ considered and decided by the r weeks froni fhe date of rcceipt oj In view of above subiaissi fhe uistaat petition is disposed representation before fhe grievances wifhm a period c representation being made, the by the respondent No.4 wifhin i date ofrcceipt of representationj contemplated by fhe impugne^ reprcsentation is decided by fhe cp|'qfo<nr1 +1l+1C^Y^'f^l<l ^FJI^<II< ^arf^r sn^sT |ate subndts that ia case fhe petitioner ^al of her gnevaaces, the saaie shaU be espondent No.4 wifhin a period offour representation, lons of leamed counsel for fhe pardes, [ofwifh Uberty to fhe petitioner to fUe a res|pondent No,4 for rcdressal of her ^f one week from today. On siich Isame shaU be considered aad decided ^ fiirther period of four weeks from fhe It is further directed that recoveiy, as |1 order, shatl remabi stayed tiU the |respondent No.4. — - Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge