In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CR No.3885 of 2007 Date of decision:17.08.2007. Punjab Financial Corporation ... Petitioner. Versus M/s. Mehra Cio-Chem (Punjab) Limited .... Respondent. Present: Mr.VM Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. -- PERMOD KOHLI, J.( Oral): This revision is directed against the order dated 25.7.2007, Annexure P-3, whereby the learned trial Court has permitted the plaintiff- respondent to prove a document i.e. Resolution dated 17.01.1997 by way of evidence. It has been recorded by the learned trial Court that the document was already on record but due to some inadvertence or negligence on the part of the counsel, the same could not be exhibited. The trial Court has also opined that the document is relevant for the just and proper adjudication of the controversy involved in the suit and allowed the respondent to prove the document. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at length. I am of the opinion that the learned trial Court has exercised its judicial jurisdiction. Such an order is not required to be interfered with by this Court, particularly when the Court has formulated an opinion that -2- the document/evidence is necessary for the just and proper adjudication of the controversy involved in the case. I do not find any merit in this revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs. (Permod Kohli) Judge August 17, 2007. BLS