IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE NO.16867 OF 2007. 1.PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH, S/O SUKHDEO PRASAD SINGH. 2.ANIRUDH KUMAR SINGH, S/O SUKHDEO PRASAD SINGH. BOTH RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE DEFARA, P.O VISHANPUR ARAR,P.S MURLIGANG, DISTRICT MADHEPURA. …………………PETITIONERS. VERSUS 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, VIKASH BHAWAN, PATNA. 3.THE SECRETARY CUM COMMISSIONER, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4.THE DIRECTOR OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 5.THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, SAHARSA. 6.THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER,MADHEPURA. 7.THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, SUPAUL. 8.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION,SAHARSA. 9.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION,MADHEPURA. 10.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION,SUPAUL. 11.THE B.E.E.O, GUALPURA, DISTRICT MADHEPURA. 12.THE B.E.E.O, GHAITARH, DISTRICT MADHEPURA. 13.THE B.E.E.O, KAHARA, DISTRICT SAHARSA. 14.THE B.E.E.O, BAKHATIYARPUR, DISTRICT SAHARSA. 15.THE B.E.E.O, SAUR BAZAAR, DISTRICT SAHARSA. 16.THE BHARTIYA SHIKSHA PARISHAD UTTAR PRADESH, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, BHARAT BHAWAN, NATIYARI CHINHAT, FAIZABAD ROAD, LUCKNOW. ………………………RESPONDENTS. ----------------- 2 02/ 22.12.2011 No one appears for the petitioners. Counsel for the respondents is present and would point out the prayer of the petitioner in this writ application for recognizing the degree of Bharatiya Shiksha Parishad, Lucknow is wholly misconceived, inasmuch as, the said institute is not recognized by N.C.T.E. That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)