>'" ^- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W.P. (S) No.6750/2007 Sevak Ram. Dhruv, aged about 60 years, S/o. Shri Bhagoli Dhiuv, R/o. ViUage- TheBd, Post - Lachhanpur Palari, District- Raipur(C.G.) 2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Water Resources Department, Maatralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) Sub Divisional Ofiicer, Sub Division. No. 6, Water Mao.agein.ent, Sub Division No. 6, Baloda Bazar, District- Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITIQN UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearaace: Shri Suiiil Otwaru, Counsel for the petitioaer. Shii Ajay Ehtivedi, Paael Lawyer for tlie State/ i^spondents. (13.11.; SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heaixl. Leamed counsel for the petitioner subiuits tliat a permanent Gaag-inaii is to be retired at the age of 62 years in accordaace wifh the Chha.tiisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam 1967 read wifh Fundamental Rules, 56. He also subinits fhat the poiat raised has been decided by this Court in batch ofmatters i.e. W.P. No. 108/2005 and inauy oUier connected niatters on 04.01.2007, reported in 2007 (2) C.G.L.J. 39 /Gotrinri & Others vs. State of C.G. cmd others) and this niatter is squarely covered by fhat decision, which may be disposed ofon the same tenns, Leamed counsel for fhe State fatrly agrees fhat this inatter is covered by the said decision. However, he subinits that ui soine niatters fhe State has filed writ appeals. W.P.(S)No.6750/2007 Unless som.e initerim. oider is passed, merely on accouiit of filuig of the writ appeal, hearmg of ftiis writ petition caanot be kept in abeyance, when the matter is squarely covered by fhe said judgment. In fhe result, this petition is allowed. It is disposed of ia terms of the order dated 04.01.2007 passed in W.P. No. 108/2005 aad other comiected matters. No order as to cost. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge amita