1 ra230.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION NO. 230 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7962 OF 2010 Satindra S/o Chandrrao Gopwad ..PETITIONER -VERSUS- State of Maharashtra and others ..RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. S.B. Gastgar, advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, advocate for respondents ..... (CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, JJ) DATED : 14th March, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard Advocate Mr. S.B. Gastgar for petitioner. Writ Petition no. 7962 of 2010 is dismissed by this Court on 6th September, 2010 after holding that Government Resolution dated 19th October, 2007 categorically states that in respect of subsequent vacancies there will be a fresh selection process and waiting list can not be utilised. In the face of this observations, now by this Review Petition the prayer is to quash and set aside that part of Government Resolution. Learned Counsel urges that later part of this Government resolution dated 19.10.2007 particularly paragraph no.9 which states that subsequent vacancies should not be filled in from the candidates on waiting list and those are to be filled in by a fresh selection process. According to it enlisted candidates can not be recommended and new selection process is to be followed for subsequent vacancies. 2 ra230.10 2. This Court has correctly considered the controversy. Relevant clause shows that waiting list only operates when the appointed candidates does not report or then his appointment is found to be contrary to Rules or is found unfit because of invalidity of caste claim or for any other reason. Here the selected candidate did join, worked and then resigned. 3. Challenge is thus misconceived and insufficient for Review. No case is made out warranting review. Application rejected. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE JUDGE gas/ra230.10