1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2788/2009. (Vishwanathrao s/o Narayan Surkute Vs. The State of Mah.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.JV Deshpande, Adv. for applicant; Mr.DR Korde, APP for State. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL,J. DATE : 16 th October 2009. 1. Heard learned Counsel. 2. The accused/applicant enjoyed bail during trial, however, after the judgment in Criminal Appeal No.12/2005 recorded by Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli dated 21.7.2009, the accused is in custody for offence under Section 394 r/w 34 of IPC. 3. In the scenario, in which the accused/applicant is placed, and when the record prima facie indicate that the seizure panchanama is not coherently proved as the panch has given distorted version, the accused/applicant deserves to be released on bail as under - 4. Execution of sentence is suspended. The accused/applicant be released on the same terms of bail, on which he was 2 initially released by Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli with fresh bond. Bail to be given before the Additional Sessions Judge at Hingoli. 5. Criminal Application disposed of in the aforesaid terms. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/cran2788.09