GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL R. APPLICATION NO. 408 OF 2002 R. APPLICATION NO. 408 OF 2002 R. APPLICATION NO. 408 OF 2002 Dattatraya Maruti Jagtap ...Petitioner versus Arun Ramchandra Riswadkar & anr. ...Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri U.R. Agandsurve for the petitioner- absent. Shri R.S.Khadapkar APP for State. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 20TH JUNE, 2005 20TH JUNE, 2005 20TH JUNE, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This Revision Application is directed against the order of acquittal passed by the learned trial Judge. The trial Judge has properly appreciated the evidence on record and reached the conclusion of finding the accused not guilty of the offence with which they were charged. There is nothing on record to infer that the order of acquittal is either illegal or perverse. Hence no interference is called for. Application is dismissed.