(1) WP 3206.2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3206 OF 2011 Bhartiya Banjara Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Khel Tanda, Tq. Lohara, Dist. Osmanabad PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. N.P. Patil Jamalpurkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. ..... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 22ND AUGUST, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. The petitioner impugns the communication dated 17.03.2011, vide which the permission granted in favour of the petitioner to run Balak Ashram has been withdrawn/cancelled. 2. Perusal of the paperbook would reveal that prior to taking such an action, a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner. The reply filed by the petitioner was considered by the authority before passing the impugned order. As such it cannot be said that there has been any procedural irregularity (2) WP 3206.2011 in passing the impugned order. While exercising the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, this Court is concerned with the decision making process but not the ultimate decision. Reliance can be made to the observations of the Apex Court in Tata Cellular Vs. Union of India 1994 (6) S.C.C. 651. 3. Since we do not find any error in the decision making process, no case has been made for interference. Petition stands dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- [M. T. JOSHI,J.] [B. R. GAVAI,J.] arp/