SSK/917 1 apl 956.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 956 OF 2011 Ajay Ganesh Ubale ....Applicant Versus Ms. Shobhana Bhartia & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Vijay Hiremath, advocate for the applicant. Mr. Shirish Gupte, Sr. Advcoate with Mr. Amey Nabar and Mr. Ameya Deosthale, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. S. V. Gajare, APP for the State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 28th NOVEMBER, 2011. P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The petitioner by this application challenges Order dated 1st August, 2011 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate whereby his application at Exhibit “P-13” came to be rejected. By the said application, the applicant’s prayed for cancellation of exemption granted to all the respondents. According to the applicant, the exemption should be cancelled as the respondents-accused did not comply with Order dated 21st February, 2011 passed by this High Court in Criminal Application no.3520 of 2010, inasmuch as, neither the respondents nor their advocate remained present on 5th May, 2011. According to the respondents, on 30th March, SSK/917 2 apl 956.11 2011, the complaint was adjourned to 5th May, 2011 at 2.45 p.m. for recording further evidence, however, the matter was called out in the morning session, and therefore, nobody was present. Record shows that the respondents’ advocate was present on 5th May, 2011, though not at 11.00 a.m.. The applicant filed the application for cancellation of exemption after one and half month from 5th May, 2011. The Magistrate rightly refused to grant the prayer of the complainant. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to interfere in the aforesaid revision in the jurisdiction of this Court conferred under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The criminal revision application is, accordingly, dismissed. (RANJIT MORE, J.)