spb/- 1 cra247-07.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 247 OF 2007 Mukhatar Varisali Shaikh ... Applicant/Petitioner. V/s. Varisali Valimohammed Shaikh & Ors. ... Respondents. --- Mr. S.s. Kulkarni for the Applicant. Mr. V.S.Gokhale the Respondent nos. 2 and 3. ----- CORAM : D. G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 24th JANUARY, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. 2 Respondent no.1 has died long ago. Despite repeated opportunities given to the revision applicant, he has not taken any steps qua respondent no.1. Hence, by reason of a self operative order dated 17th June, 2008, the Revision Application against respondent no.1 was dismissed. The civil application no. 157 of 2008 taken out subsequently was also dismissed. 3 The revision applicant had filed the suit against the respondents for a declaration that the revision applicant be declared as a tenant so spb/- 2 cra247-07.sxw inducted by the respondent no.1 in the suit premises. Since the suit was dismissed and in view of the death of the respondent no.1, no declaration can now be granted to the effect that the petitioner is a tenant of the respondent no.1 in view of dismissal of the C.R.A. against him. 4 Consequently, the entire revision application stands dismissed. [D.G. KARNIK, J.]