^ .s'^ "s IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) \N.P.No.S3fs, A2006 Petitioner Shri Ram Joshi S/o Shri Kartikeshwar Prasad Joshi, -v.^-. ^ ^"^;^'' .,. Aged about 57 years, R/o Naya Mandi .^'~ ..•••' Para JaarialDur Rastar ICC,) .<?^^^""" ^•^r^v'y ^•".^ ?'.e? RigSpondents '^ Para, Jagdalpur, Bastar (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh - Through the Secretary, Revenue Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) <^2. The Collector, Dantewada, Bastar 3. Shri Ghansyam Dewangan, Patwari, ^ Halka No.17, Potepani, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 XI-HC-22 sn^rw 1N^3^!T ShHltlflfer *<11WI Stlll^ d-u) .<<i<iici^, ©Tdu'is,fi|cfiy^< 311^1 Msltft g^.^.^.^^.9^1^ Rl'b^ 3lA.il 6«IIWflf?(T 12.7-2( Shri P. Diwakar, Sr. Adli/ocate with Shri Adi! Mii the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, !peputy Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondents No.1 and 2, on ac|vance copy. Heard both the counsel. 5y this writ petition, t| propriety of the order dated| petitioner has been transf^ Rajnandgaon. The case of the petiti Dantewada District, due to d 28-2-96 and thereafter death disturbed, therefore, he made Department vide Annexure-P; Sastar, as only 3 years are ! Considering the case of the transferring the petitioner fij expenses. However, he has b|; Lsarned counsei for instance the seniority of Pah<4 therefore, he cannot be transf^ a request for Bastar and he \ r't* settie iS^n in his home town, b| Therefore, learned counsel fij aiiowed to maks a representa| «t)i<ifcl41-lll*ldTfffei<il <Rt+<;K ^Slf^ITST^T j, Advocate for le petitioner has questioned legality and 23-6-2006 (Annexuire-P/5) whereby the rred from the District: Dantewada to |5ner is that he is worklng as Patwari in ^ath of the petitioner's daughter-in-law on .' |;f his son on 11-6-2005, the petitioner fet representation to the Secretary, Revenue p for transfemng him to his home District ^ft in attaining the age of superannuation. jsetitioner, even the Collector, Bastar also made a proposal to the Rev^nue Commissioner vide Annexure-P/4 for om Dantewada to Bastar on his own sen transferred to Rajnandgaon. :he petitioner submltted that in the first iri is being maintained at the distriet levei, rred ouf of the district. The petitioner made ,'as ready to forgo his seniority in order to A he has been transferred to Rajnandgaon. rther submitted that the petitioner may be ion to respondent No.1 and he be directed (^^fe^) XI-HC-22 3^?Z(PTRCT, Srfte1!?, fa<rtl«y Bap/e l^ . •A3 //y/ 3TT^?T MS|<t) ItTIT^II Sh*11«t> W^ 200 Rl'txd an^TW R-fi+sn^r *Ki+ ^Rd dhW^^ KIKcTl'ff feiA <Rl<^K ^i?l1^T3n^T to decide the same to which is^imed counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 has no objection. Having heard learned co|jnsel for the parties, having regard to the facts and cii'cumstances.of the|case, vi/ithout expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, prayer ma|de by learned counsel for the petitioner is just, fair and reasonable, therej detaiied representation along wil within a periodoftVi/o weeks frc ;ore, the petitioner is allowed to make a :h copy of this petition to respondent No.1 im today raising all his grievances and in turn, respondent No.1 is directec) to decide representation ofthe petitioner within a period of 2 months irdpn the date of receipt of representation, considering ali the points raised |by the petitioner, in an objective manner, in accordance with iaw. 1 However, as the pefition^r has been transferred out of the district, therefore, it is directed that effecft and operation of the impugned order in respect of the petitioner shall [remain stayed ti!!, the decision of the representation. | With the direction aforesaiji, the petition stands disposed of. Consequentiy, M.(W.)P. |No.2608/2006 and I.A. No.6677/2006 stand disposed of. Parties areentitted forcert|fiedcopyofthisorder. . - Sd<- ; L.C. Bi'sciao i Judge (^y^)