IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.24502 of 2008 Between: M.Rama Kameshwari ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Registrar, Osmania University, Hyderabad. 2. The Director, Institute of Genetics and Hospital for Genetics Diseases, Osmania University, Begumpet, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the order issued by the Deputy Registrar vide impugned letter No.3508/117/89/Estt. Dated 16.8.2005 and set aside the letter dated 16.8.2005 as arbitrary, illegal, unwarranted and violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and direct the respondents to pay annual grade increments, arrears of salary pertaining to the alleged period of absence from 1.3.1989 to 3.11.1998 (about 8 years) with all other consequential beneﬁts. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MODALAVALASA KRISHNA RAO The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.24502 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled seeking a Mandamus declaring the action of the Deputy Registrar vide impugned letter dated 16.8.2005 as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to pay annual grade increments, arrears of salary pertaining to the period from 1.3.1989 to 3.11.1998 with all consequential benefits. It appears, a detailed enquiry was conducted petitioner was on leave for about six months and after conducting a detailed enquiry, she was removed from service. Aggrieved thereby, she ﬁled a writ petition before this Court and this Court while setting aside the termination order, directed reinstatement of the petitioner into service and as of now, she is working. However, petitioner made a representation to the respondents for grant of leave salary, annual grade increments for the period from 1.3.1989 to 3.11.1998. The said representation was disposed of by the respondents vide order dated 16.8.2005 stating that the petitioner is not entitled for the said beneﬁts during EOL period and on the principle ‘no work no pay’ as she has not performed any duty during that period. There is no necessity of going into further details. It appears, aggrieved by the said order dated 16.8.2005, petitioner already ﬁled appeal before the ﬁrst respondent on 26.11.2005 and the same is pending. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on merits, the ﬁrst respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal purported to have been ﬁled by the petitioner on 26.11.2005 questioning the order dated 16.8.2005 and pass appropriate orders, as per law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 7.11.2008 DA THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No24502 of 2008 7.11.2008