cran5563.11 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5563 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 669 OF 2011 Rajesh Babulal Kurlibans ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondents ..... Mr. S.J. Salgare, advocate for the applicant Mr. V.D. Godbharle, APP for respondent ..... CORAM : S. B. DESHMUKH AND A.M. THIPSAY, JJ. DATED : 20TH DECEMBER, 2011 P. C. :- 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Notice to respondent. Learned APP takes notice. 2 Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. 3 By this application, the applicant seeks condonation of around cran5563.11 -2- 47 days delay occurred in filing the criminal appeal. The appeal filed by the applicant is against the conviction recorded by the learned trial court for the offence punishable under section 302 of I.P.C. The applicant, undisputedly, is directed to suffer life imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.500/- with default stipulation. We have seen the other punishment imposed upon the present applicant under Section 452 of I.P.C. and conviction imposed upon him. 4 Undisputedly, the present applicant is in jail. We are inclined to allow the application seeking condonation of delay of 47 days. The application is allowed, for the reasons stated in paras 2 and 3 of the application. The delay caused in filing the appeal, to the extent of 47 days, stands condoned. The application is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause A and B and disposed of. 5 Rule made absolute in the above terms. ( A. M. THIPSAY, J.) (S. B. DESHMUKH, J.) rlj/