IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7506 of 2009 SANJEEV KUMAR SON OF ISHWARI PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA NARAINGARH, P.S. RAMPUR, DISTRICT GAYA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 09-06-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under sections 392 and 411 of the Penal Code registered in regard to the robbery committed in a train compartment against four unknown accused persons. Petitioner has been implicated in this case as from his custody mobile which was subject matter of the robbery was recovered. It is submitted that from the statement made in paragraph 124 of the case diary it would appear that robbed mobile, which was found in possession of the petitioner, was purchased by him from one Dhannu Kumar who also accepted the fact that he sold the same to the petitioner. Besides the present case the petitioner is not accused in any other case. Let the court below verify the aforesaid submission and if found correct then the petitioner, namely, Sanjeev Kumar, be admitted to the privilege of bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5000/- ( Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Gaya Rail P.S. Case No. 183 of 2008. BTiwary/ ( V. N. Sinha, J )