IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22-10-2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.CHOCKALINGAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN H.C.P.No.1966 of 2010 P.Kannammal .. Petitioner vs 1.The Sub Inspector of Police Mettur Police Station Mettur Salem District 2.Selvi 3.P.Ramesh .. Respondents Habeas corpus petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of habeas corpus directing the first respondent to cause the production of the body of the petitioner's brother V.Arumugham S/o. Veeran before this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Parveen For Respondents : Mr.Babu Muthu Meeran Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.CHOCKALINGAM, J.) Invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court, one Mrs.P.Kannammal has brought forth this petition alleging that her elder brother aged 52, was found missing from 10.9.2010; that a complaint was given to the first respondent on 16.9.2010; and that a case was registered for man missing in Crime No.316/2010; but they have not yet secured him. 2.In response to the above, it is contended by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the enquiry revealed that she is the younger sister of the detenu; that she is 48 and he is 52; that he has already got married; that the second respondent is his wife; that the third respondent is the son of the detenu; that originally, he filed HMOP No.25 of 2004 for divorce, and the same was also ordered in his favour; that apart from that, the second respondent filed a maintenance case seeking maintenance from her husband, the detenu, and the same is also pending; that under the circumstances, on the complaint given by the petitioner, a case has been registered, and now the investigation is pending. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.After looking into the averments made and also the submissions made on either side, it would be quite evident that there was a strained relationship in the matrimony, and the detenu was missing. The second respondent has also filed a maintenance case against the divorced husband. In such circumstances, this Court is of the considered opinion that instead of keeping the petition pending, it would be fit and proper to issue a direction to the first respondent police to investigate the case proper, secure him and produce before the concerned Court. Accordingly, a direction is issued, and this petition is disposed of. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar nsv To: 1.The Sub Inspector of Police Mettur Police Station Mettur Salem District 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. 1 cc To Mr.A.Parveen, Advocate, SR.76047 H.C.P.No.1966 of 2010 tam(co) pmk.28.10.2010. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/