IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.865 of 2010 1. DINA NATH PRASAD S/O LATE SHEO BACHAN R/O MOHALLA- SHASTRI NAGAR, P.O. & P.S.- SIWAN, DISTT.- SIWAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY, LAW DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, SIWAN (ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY), SIWAN 3. THE REGISTRAR, SIWAN CIVIL COURT 4. THE IST MUNSIF (ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY), SIWAN ----------- 2. 30.08.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 to 4. The petitioner was placed under suspension firstly on 29.5.2007 which was subsequently revoked on 29.8.2007. He was again suspended on 12.6.2008 revoked on 31.7.2008. He has been denied salary for the period of suspension. The submission that no departmental proceedings were held does not appeal to the Court as on both occasions he admitted the grounds on which the suspension were based. Be that as it may, para 12 and 13 of the counter affidavit states that if the petitioner were to apply for conversion of the period of absence to authorized leave and for payment of salary the respondents may consider the same in accordance with law. No further orders are required at this stage except to dispose off the writ application in those terms with a liberty to the petitioner to file a representation which is expected to be disposed by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)