THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CRP No.66 of 2010 Between Kosaraju Vijayalakshmi and another And Paritala Koteswara Rao and others THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CRP No.66 of 2010 Oral Order : This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order in rejecting the memo filed by the revision petitioners (defendants ) to club the suits O.S.Nos.83 of 2002 and 82 of 2002 pending before the trial Court. It is seen from the record that the trial was separately conducted in both the suits and that the petitioners on earlier occasion did not made any request to club the suits till the date of posting the matter for arguments. The revision petitioners in O.S.No.83 of 2002 also filed I.A.No.1063 of 2008 seeking to reopen the matter and to adduce the evidence. The trial Court, on evidence, allowed the I.A. on costs of Rs.500/- and directed the petitioners to complete the evidence on or before 21-10-2008. The petitioners paid the costs of Rs.500/- on 15- 10-2008, and they did not adduce the evidence. Thus, the fact remains is that though opportunity was given to the petitioners, they did not adduce any evidence and the I.A. was dismissed ultimately and the same was confirmed by this Court in CRP No.3476 of 2009 dated 15-10-2009. Since the present memo was filed at the stage of arguments, the matter being old identified matter the trial Court declined to club the suits. This being the discretionary order passed by the trial Court, I do not see any illegality, irregularity or error of jurisdiction in the impugned order. The Civil Revision Petition fails and is dismissed. However, the trial Court shall dispose of the matter expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. _______________ GM, J Kk 29-1-2010 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CRP No.66 of 2010 29-1-2010