1 C.W.P. No. 5984 of 1990 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH --- Civil Writ Petition No. 5984 of 1990 Date of Decision: March 10, 2010 S.K. Sharma --- Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --- Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL *** PRESENT: None for the petitioner. Mr. Ashwani Markenday, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. Ravinder Hooda, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate for Mr. C.B.Goel, Advocate for respondent No.4. --- AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 10.4.1990 (Annexure P-15), passed by the Financial Commissioner and Secretary to Government of Haryana, Local Government Department, Chandigarh, (respondent No.1.) and order dated 2 C.W.P. No. 5984 of 1990 20.4.1990 (Annexure P-16) passed by the Chief Administrator, Faridabad Complex Administration, Faridabad (respondent No.2). Learned counsel for respondent No.2 states that all benefits as claimed by the petitioner in the petition have already been given to him and the present petition has been, therefore, rendered infructuous and deserves to be disposed of as such. In view of the aforesaid categorical stand of Mr. Ravinder Hooda, learned counsel for respondent No.2, this writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. Since no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, it shall, however, be open to him to make an application for revival of the writ petition in case it is shown that something survives in the petition or the statement of Mr. Ravinder Hooda, learned counsel for respondent No.2 made in the Court today, is found to be incorrect. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) March 10, 2010 JUDGE *RKMALIK*