HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH1 BILASPUR‘ Writ Petition (227) No.3552 of 2010 PETITIONERSI: (Non—appiicants No. & ) 3% 1. Gopal Agrawal. S/o Late Shri Kartik Shyam Agrawal, Girdhar Agrawal S/o Late Shri ~Kar1ik Shyam Agrawal, i Both R/o Village Than Khamhariya,. Distt. Durg (CG.) Versus 1. Madan Lal Agrwal, S/o Kishanchand Agrawal R/o Village Than Khamhariya, Distt. DUrg (CG.) Applicant RESPONDENTSI: (Applicant & applicants No.3 to 5 nOn- Govind Agrawal, S/o Late K‘artik Shyam graWaI, R/oBaIaji Rice Mill, »Nawagafh Road, Berrietara, Distt. Durg (CG.)’ Non—applicant Ghanshyam Agrawal, S/o Late Kartik‘ Shyam AgrawaL R/o Shyam Rice Trading Company, Nawagarh. Road, Bemetara, Distt. Durg (CG.) > Non-appiicant 3 tate of Chhattisgarh, Through the Coilector, Distt. Durg (CG.) Non-applicant 4 {Writ petition under Article 227 of the_Constitution of India Pt resen: Mr. 'Sanjay Shyam Agrawal, counsei for the petitioners. Mr. Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondent N014. Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. T 4 ORAL‘ ORDER (27-7-201 0) 1. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the orders impugned dated '30-9-2008 & 29-12-2009 passed by the Board of ’ Revenue in Revision Revenue Case 2N0.RN/O5/R/A-6I364I2007“ 8v evenue Review Case No.RN/05/R/A-6/81/2006, respectively; the Order dated 30-‘11-2005 passed by the Additional Tahsildar, Khamhariya in Revenue Case No.12A—6 year 2004-05 and the order dated 8-3-2007 v 1 2 ) A " S } x .P. Sharma, J ‘ , R passed e Additional oto Bemtara i evisio C N.3- 7 /05-06. . y the orders impugned passed by the Board of Revenue the Board of WW Revenue has restored the order dated 30—11-2005 passed by the dditionalTahSIldar which reads as follows — mawmmwawmmaWW’ .ammaétvmhAa‘mwwmmmmwaQ ammmwzbel The Additional Tahsildar has not denied the claim of any party and has r ' rovided opportunity of hearing to the parties relating to their claim. The 5 Board of Revenue has rightly reversed the order of the Additional V Collector Bemetara and has restored the order passed by the Additional Tahsuldar l do not find any Illegality In the orders passed by the Board of Revenue Consequently, the petition is liable to be dismissed and it is . hereby dismissed in limine No order as to costs Sd/— ‘ T.P.Sharma } a Judge . l.A.1 sand od of. by th Cllecr, e n Rn ase o9/A 6 B A . p No. ts dispse