2.wp.1515-10 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.1515 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra and another. ..Petitioners. Versus Ms.Madhuri Diwakar Landge. ..Respondent. ... Mr.V.P. Malvankar, AGP, for the Petitioners - State. Mr.N.V. Bandiwadekar, Advocate for the Respondent. ... CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 25, 2010. P.C. 1. By this Petition, the petitioners - State challenges the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai allowing the Original Application filed by the respondent. The respondent was provisionally selected for the post of Senior Clerk, but, her selection was canceled because she did not submit domicile certificate along with her application. The MAT held that there is no dispute that the respondent was domicile of Maharashtra because she was born in Bombay. The School Leaving certificate which was, admittedly, 2.wp.1515-10 2 produced by the respondent along with her application, specifically mentions that the place of birth of the respondent is Bombay. The domicile certificate which was subsequently submitted also certifies that she is domicile in Maharashtra by birth because she was born in Bombay. In our opinion, as there was material available along with the application form itself, establishing that the respondent is domicile in Maharashtra, there could be no dispute about her domicile in Maharashtra and, therefore, in our opinion, the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal was justified in making the order that it had made. Petition is rejected. (D.K. DESHMUKH,J.) (A.R. JOSHI, J.)