1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 3100 of 2009 Indubai v. State of Maharashtra -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr C.U. Hadole, Adv for applicant Mr A. Parihar, APP for State Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 15th September 2009 1. Applicant is seeking bail in Crime No. 13/09 registered with Police Station, Rahimpur, District Amravati under Sections 307, 302, 201, 498A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State. 2. In her dying declaration, deceased Ujwala has stated that she had quarrel with her husband and applicant and her husband’s brother infused quarrel and applicant said that she (Ujwala) has to be burnt and not to be kept at home. She then poured kerosene on her person and threw lighted match-stick on her person and thus, set her on fire. 3. Learned counsel for applicant that story put up in dying declaration is unbelievable inasmuch as applicant is aged about 60 years and deceased was a young girl. 2 5. Defence taken up by applicant that she being of 60 years age, could not have done such type of act and that dying declaration is written at the instance of Ujwala’s relatives may come in aid of applicant on merits of trial. At this stage, there is incriminating material collected by prosecution against applicant. Application for bail is, therefore, rejected. Learned counsel for applicant that applicant would cooperate with expeditious disposal of trial. If that be so, learned trial Court shall dispose of sessions case on merit as early as possible and preferably within three months. Judge. hsj