23 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1027/2009. Surendra Mewara Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :: 17th April 2009. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. Rajesh Joshi, for the petitioner. .... BY THE COURT: Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the material placed on record, this writ petition could only be dismissed as premature. The petitioner suggests that certain recovery proceedings are going to be adopted by the respondents but has only placed on record a communication dated 20.08.2008 (Annex.5) whereby the Excise Inspector has sought information of movable and immovable properties of the petitioner from the Patwari concerned. The petitioner has failed to state and place on record if any specific recovery proceedings under the Land Revenue Act have been adopted against him. In this view of the matter, the writ petition as constituted could only be considered to be premature and the same is rejected as such. It is, of course, without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to take resort to appropriate remedies in accordance with law. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. /Mohan/