IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 118 of 2011 Mr. Neeraj Kumar Gupta & another. ………. Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. ..………. Respondents Mr. Mangal Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Ms. Anjali Bhargava, Addl. Standing Counsel (Central Govt.) for respondent No. 4. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. BARIN GHOSH, C. J. (Oral) Withdrawal Application No. 11545 of 2011; There was no just reason on the part of the counsel for respondent No. 8 to refuse to accept a copy of the present Application. By the Application, petitioners seek permission to withdraw the writ petition. 2. We allow the Application and, thereby, dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn. It shall be deemed that the defect, as pointed out by the Registry, stands removed. (U.C. Dhyani, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C. J.) 15.11.2011 15.11.2011 G