THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 102 OF 2010 Dated 7th July, 2010 Between: Golvi V.V.Ganapati Naidu and another …Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Secretary and two others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri A.Ravi Shankar Counsel for respondents 1 and 2: AGP for Home Counsel for respondent No.3: Sri G.Vidyasagar The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the panel sent by the District Judge Srikakulam to the District Collector, Srikakulam for appointment of Assistant Government Pleader to the Court of the Junior Civil Judge Narasannapeta, Srikakulam Dist by changing the panel of the Advocates as recommended by the concerned Court as illegal and arbitrary and consequently set aside the same.” At the hearing, Sri A.Ravi Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP No.108 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 7th July, 2010 vrn