IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID MONDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2009 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 RP.No. 1139 of 2009(M) ---------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER: APPELLANTS -------------------------------------------------- 1. V.M.STALIN, SUBHA VIHAR, MANNARA WARD, MARARITHOTTATHU BUNGLOW, POTHENKODU, ANDOORKONAM VILLAGE. 2. REVEENDRANATHA KURUKKAL, LALITHA NIVAS, MANNARA WARD, DO- DESHAM AND VILLAGE, 3. RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR MADHUSOODHANAN NAIR KIZHAKKE VILAKATHU VEEDU, DO-O- 4. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR MANIKUTTAN NAIR, POTHAMKOTTU VEEDU DO-DO- 5. PARAMESWARN NAIR, P.T.MADHAVAN, KIZHAKKEVILAKAM, KAROOR. 6. CHELLAPPAN PILLAI HARIKUMAR, KRISHNA BHAVANAM, -DO- -DO- 7. CHELLAPAN PILLAI RAJENDRAN NAIR, KRISHNA BHAVAN, -DO- -DO- 8. KRISHNAPILLAI VIJAYAN NAIR, PUTHEN VEEDU, CHETTICHIRA, -DO- -DO-. 9. KUTTAN PILLAI VIKRAMAN NAIR, VANDANAM, -DO- -DO-. 10. SUKUMARA PILLAI VISHAMBARAN NAIR, AKKARAVILA VEEDU, -DO- -DO-. 11. KRISHNA PILLAI APPUKUTTAN NAIR, THETTICHIRA PUTHEN VEEDU, -DO- -DO-. 12. VASUDEVAN PILLAI SOMAN NAIR, STHUTHI VIHAR, -DO- -DO-. 13. SANKAR PILLAI PARAMESWARAN NAIR, ANJANA BHAVAN, -DO- -DO-. 14. MADHAVAN PILLAI KRISHNAN NAIR, KIZHANGOTTU VILAKATHU VEEDU, -DO- -DO-. 15. PARAMESWARAN PILLAI SADHASIVAN NAIR, THENAKKATHUVILAKATHU VEEDU, -DO- -DO-. 16. SASIKUMARAN NAIR, VADAKKEKUNNUVILA VEEDU, -DO- -DO-. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS ------------------------------------------------------ 1. SREE PANIMOLA DEVI TEMPLE, ANDOORKONAM. 2. MADHAVAN PILLAI GOPALAN NAIR, EDAKKATTUKONATHU VEEDU, EDATHARA MURI, ANDOORKONAM VILLAGE, (PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD COMMITTEE). 3. CHELLAPPAN PILLAI SUKUMARA PILLAI (SECRETARY),USHA, KEEZHAIKONAM, VENJARAMOODU NILANADU VILLAGE, FROM MOOZHIBHAGAOM, EDATHRA MURI, ANDOORKONAK VILLAGE. 4. PADMANABHA PILLAIRKONAM VILLAGE. 5. MADHAVAN PILLAI MANIKANTAN NAIR (JOINT SECRETARY), KARIKKALATHUKONATHU VEEDU, -DO- -DO-. 6. AYYAPPAN PILLAI RAVENDRAN NAIR, ERMANGALATHU VEEDU, -DO- -DO-. 7. JANARDHANAN PILLAI PRABHAKARAN NAIR, TERMANGALATHU VEEDU, -DO- -DO-. 8. CHELLAPPAN PILLAI GOPIMOHANAN NAIR, JANAKI MANDIRAM, -DO- -DO-. 9. RAGHAVAN PILLAI SIVANKUTTY NAIR, LEKSHMI NILAYAM FROM KIZHAKKEMANALVATTOM VEEDU, -DO- -DO-. 10. CHELLAPPAN PILLAI VELAYUDHAN NAIR, KODUPOOJA VEEDU, -DO- -DO-. 11. PARAMESWARAN PILLAI BHASKARA PILLAI, NANKARTHALA VEEDU, -DO- -DO-. 12. M.AYYAPPAN NAIR, MANGALATHU VEEDU, -DO- -DO-. 13. KRISHNAN KUTTY NAIR, ROHINI BHAWAN, PANIMOOLA, ANDOORKONAM P.O. 14. R.SUKUMARAN NAIR, LEKSHMI NIVAS, PANIMOOLA, ANDOORKONAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 15. G.KRISHNANKUTTY NAIR, MURALEEPURAM PANIMOOLA, ANDOORKONAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 16. VELAYUDHAN PILLAI PEETHAMBARAN NAIR, KIZHAKKEKONATHU VEEDU, -DO- -DO- 17. GOPALA PILLAI MAHESWARAN NAIR, PUTHUSSERIVILA VEEDU, -DO- -DO-. 18. MADHAVAN GOPI, KUNNUVILA VEEDU, -DO- -DO-. 19. VELAYUDHAN SOMAN NAIR, PALPUNCHIVILA VEEDU, -DO- -DO-. 20. KRISHNA PILLAI RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, TWINCE LAND, -DO- -DO-. 21. BHUVANA CHANDRAN PILLAI, MUTTATHIL VEEDU, PANIMOOLA, MANNARA WARD, ANDOORKONAM VILLAGE. 22. RAMAN PILLAI KESAVAN NAIR, SREE NILAYAM, KAROOR, EDATHARA MURI, ANDOORKONAM VILLAGE. 23. KRISHNA PILLAI VELAYUDHAN PILLAI, KAROOR KADA, -DO- -DO-. 24. GANGADHARAN PILLAI CHANDRAN NAIR, DHANYA BHAWAN, -DO- -DO-. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ---------------------------------------- R.P.No.1139 of 2009 in A.S. No. 627 of 2000 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of December, 2009 ORDER By judgment dated 23.10.2009 this Court set aside the judgment and decree under appeal and remanded the case for denovo consideration. As an interim arrangement, this Court also ordered that the state of affairs as of now shall continue till the disposal of the suit after remand and that the persons who are in charge of the administration and management of the temple are at liberty to utilise the income including the interest accrued on fixed deposits for meeting the expenses in connection with the administration of the temple. The present review petition is filed by the review petitioners who are appellants 3 to 4, 6 to 10, 13 to 17, 20 to 22 and 25 in the appeal .The review petitioners are seeking a clarification to the judgment of this Court, regarding the operation of accounts and also regarding the persons who are in charge of administration and management of the temple. No doubt what is referred in the last paragraph of this Court's judgment is that the Committee in management of the temple can administer the day to day affairs of the temple by spending amounts necessary and that if further sum is required for any developmental purposes or the like purposes the Manging Committee or authorised administrators can withdraw the interest -2- accrued on fixed deposits. This Court has not issued any direction to withdraw the fixed deposit amounts for any other purpose. If the review petitioners have any grievance about the manner in which the income of the temple is utilised they can prefer necessary petitions before the court below for appropriate reliefs. With the above observation, the review petition is dismissed. (HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE) es. HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. --------------------------- R.P.No.1139 of 2009 in A.S. No. 627 of 2000 ---------------------------- order 7th December, 2009