IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Interim Relief Application No.3721 of 2010 In Writ Petition No. 747of 2010 (M/S) Swati Kalra and others. ……Petitioners. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ….Respondents. Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Addl. C.S.C. for the State-respondents. Dated: -18-05-2010 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to decide the applications of the petitioners pending in the office of respondent No.4. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State- respondents has submitted that if the order is passed to decide the applications, he has no objection. The prayer is innocuous. The respondent no. 4 i.e. Tehsildar, Tehsil Nainital is directed to decide the applications of the petitioners, preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of the production of the certified copy of this order. With the said direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma, J.) 18-05-2010 MK