^SSi. "^ H!GH COURT OF JUDICATURB CHHATTiSGARH : B!LASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SATiSH K. AGNSHOTRI, J, Gendram Kurre, Son of Pratap Singh Kurre, Aged about 43 years, Assistant 'eacher, Govt. Primary School, Parsadakaia, Slock Shakti, District Janjgir-Champa (C.'G.) Vfe :NT6 State of Chhailisgarh, Through the Secretar/, Educatlon Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) The Biock Education OfRcer, Shakti, Distt. Janjgir - Champa (C.G .) •^s-^ar^t 3 Shri A.N. Shukla, counsel forthe petitloner Ms. Deepaii Pandey, Panei Lav.ry'er for the State/respondents. (Passed on O3'u Aprii, 2007) 1. Lssrned counsel aDDearina for ths petitioner as weil as for the State/respondents jointiy submit that the fact and question of Saw involved in ths present writ petition are the same to that in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipai Corporation, Durg and another {200S (!1) IViPJR-CG 95), which has bsen disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Learned counssl appearing for the respondents does not confrovertthe said submission. 2. 'n subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Pstitton (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The Stats Govt. of Chhattisgarh and anothsr) and o'iher connected matters, decided by this Court on -s- 15.12.2008, pursuant to the memo dated 28.01.1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopai and the prospectus of Dipioma in Education Examination, it was ciarified Shat the nomenciature of the Basic Training 'nstitute, i.e. B.T.I. has been chanaed and renarned as DiDloma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordinaly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma Vs. The State ofGovt. of Chhattisgarh and another)(Supra). (3) Accordingly, the writ petition is aliowed in terms of the order passed In the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipai Corporation; Durg and another (Supra), subject to verlflcation of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired D.Ed. Examination Certiflcate on his own expenses as per the cirou'ars dafed 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether he has besn paid tivo advance increments or not. No order as to costs. ^' Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge 1