IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.907 of 2009 MD. MASOOD @ MASOOD, son of Md. Iliyas, resident of village-Sir Sayeed Colony, P.S.Araria, District-Araria. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.2.2009 Heard Sri Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case has been registered under different Sections of the Explosive Substance Act and the alleged recovery from the pant pocket of the petitioner is of a substance which could be measuring 3”x 2 ½”x1”. It was contended that if it could be really an explosive material and the petitioner could be possessing it for any other purposes or intent as are spoken of by the three provisions of the concerned act then it is not supposed that the same could be carried in the pant pocket of the petitioner. The further contention is that it is a case of false implication on the allegation of heightened recovery of a substance which ultimately could not be an explosive substance. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.5,000/-(five thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in Araria P.S.Case No.485 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )