IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 899 of 2008 (M/S) Kamran Firoz. ..…….. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. ……….. Respondents Mr. M. Ali and Mr. R.K. Dwivedi, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Brief Holder for respondents Nos. 1 & 2. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. After arguing for a while, Mr. M. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a revision petition before a competent authority against the impugned order. Prayer allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. If the revision petition has, in the meantime, become time- bared, it will be open to the petitioner to apply for condonation of the delay on the ground of pendency of this writ petition in this Court. This Court does wish to observe that pendency of this writ petition in this Court shall be construed as a good enough ground warranting condonation of the delay. (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 03.06.2008 G