^^ ?^y IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT » BILASPUR W.P. (C) N0. OF 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Vijay Kumar Sidar, aged about 45 years, S/o Shri Navratan Sihgh Sidar, Occupation - Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Kachanda, Tahsil Jaijaipur, District Janjgir-Cham.pa (C.G.). VERSUS l'. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development, D.K.S. Bhavan ^VIantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Joint Director, Scheduled Tribe Research and Training Institute, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Nagar, Sector-4, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE, CQNSTITUnQN^FJNDIA FOR ISSUANCE^ OF_WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS^)RDER_QR ^IRECTION IN THE LIKE NATURE. ^^<s':< ,.,':2r<s%. /Cl-i.\ |^S2a!|| \^y^ i ] t iyi'icK "iS.'Si •s^j^—'i COURTOF CHHATTiSGARH : BiLASPUR ^V?^:; i 'r^TZ. i i ; iv^jM (U) •NO, OUy^. ^a ^U a 1 \^^-^^^- 4^'^ ^y^-,/^^ €^'^.-•-.1^1 vi'sv i^umsr s'3o; Versus Stete of Chhattisgarh & Anoiher CWrit Petitio'n under Article 22S ot the Constilution of India) Sir;aSe Bench : Hon &!e Shri Satish K. Asiiihcitii, J. Present:- Shri Rahu! Birtharev, Advocate for the peiiiioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Pane! Lawver for the State. OgDEE (Pssssd on this 14In dav of October, 2011) The oetitioner ssets for foliowlna relief: "10.1. That, t'ne Hon'bSe Court msv kind!'/ be pieased to issue an approoriate writ, order or direction includina writ in the nature of mandamus, thsreov commanmng the respondenls to pass oraeL' judginent on the svaluation of Ihe evidences submmed ror researeh, on the appiicalio" of the petiiioner for inciusion of Sawar, S^wara, Ssunra, SQnw^s Saura, SQhra {^TFT<, ^q^T, ^f^T, ^7^T. ^,*,<i, ^^tT; in the list of Scheduie Tribe of the Stale of Chhattisg3rh at Sr. No.41 within ceriain flxed ?sm3 sim^i @T Tfis ssrussi'- 2. Learned counss! sppearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner !s seeking evaluaiion of the evidences submitted for researoh and thereafter, passins the order ior exctusive of Sawar, Sav/ara, Ssunra, Ssnwra, Saura; S^hfQ (t^, ^^}, ^?T. ^CT?T. ^m^i. ?>6^T) in th8 llst Gf Scheduie Tribe of the Slate of Chhsttisciarh at Sr. No.41 . 3. K aooears that the Detitioner has aDDroached eariier to the Stafe Government seekina consideration for inciuding the above stated caste in the list of Schedute Tribes at Sr. No.41 i" the State of Chhattisgarh. The Ststs Government bv communication dated 03.08.2011 (Annexure P-41. infonned ihe oetitioner Ihat the recorrimendation was made to the Centrsi Government by a lelter dated 2S.04.2008, which was reiected by memo dated 2S.OS.2010, sassed bv the SViinistn, of Tribal Affairs, ^y^, ^. ftB-ffiS-. 1 ^^•^^"^•^- Sovernment of india. Thereafter, the petitioner wss aga'n informed on 23.03.2011 to the above effect. Ths Detiibner seete a further direction to anaivze the documents subsTiitted bv the petltioner, and theresiter, maxe a recommendaiionj uass the ordsr to include the above stated oastes in tne list of the Scheduie Tribes at Sr. No.41 aionawiih the Ssnwara, Saura. Savara in THS 11SI OT iSCHSQUIS 3 HDS in inS ^ISiS OT l»/nn3UISCi3s?1. "he reauest of the oetitioner has aireadv been considersd eariier and iheresfier, the same was forwarded to the Cenfra! Government also for considerstion, whioh nad been rejecied. Thus, the instant oetltion seeking Ihe same direction again is not maintainable and no such ^Tr-^>^~»£~^f\rl^ /~^/^T^ ^V-/^; ^!"1'£^^ T^~\-*~l 4-'ni 4'^^-^ s-ri/^ts ^^rti'^^ r"^ r^ v^4- '^n'^ •''^^"l»^fci'-^c^i-'^liST' j^^*^ ^^'SC'1/^ 'h'-^ 'm ^^ uu^^iiyii Uei^ Ut; ^:csteUs?y ^^j U^fci °iwIUVtei;3iHi;Slii, sU i yL>Ua ;^3Utii :.i;y iJCiSiK ^S i-UCT psu^'orasr, v^iiicn 'sSu s^rss'CaV QSSH consiasrsc sn'o rsjsciso 'ov THS comDetenl authoritv i.e. the Centra! Govemment. vyT;? ••^£5?i'nri'n ;R i'^fim ^&s?_ ^n^ is nsr^nv cusmi?^?s£j Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge