IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2369 OF 1999 Indian United Mills No.3/4, Unit, National Textile Compound (MN) Ltd. .... Petitioner V/s. Draupadi Sahadeo Mali & Ors. .....Respondents Mr.Jeetendra Ranawat i/b Banatwala & Co., for the Petitioner. Mr.T.R.Yadav i/b S.Z.Choudhary, for respondent No.1. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 30th AUGUST, 2008. P.C. 1. The learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner has paid the amount to the respondent No.1 and therefore, the petition has became infructous. The learned Advocate for the petitioner crave leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. 2. However, it is required to be noted that by an order dated 20-08- 1999, this Court while admitting the petition, granted stay in favour of the petitioner on depositing 50% amount in question and the respondent was permitted to withdraw the said amount. However, the learned Advocates appearing for the petitioner as well as respondents are not in a position to state that whether any such amount was deposited or whether it is withdrawn by the respondent. 3. In view of the statement of the learned Advocate for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of as having become infructous. Rule discharged. Interim relief granted earlier stands vacated. ( J.P.DEVADHAR, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )