THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29066 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a mandamus to declare the action of respondents 1 to 4 in interfering/dispossessing the petitioners from the land admeasuring Acs.4.61 cents, Acs.3.10 cents, Acs.2.82 cents, Ac.0.30 cents, Acs.3.10 cents in Survey Nos.518-1, 520-1, 567.3A, 419-A2 and 548AB respectively, situated at Kammuru Village, Kuderu Mandal, Anantapur District, as illegal and arbitrary. It is the case of the petitioners that the fifth respondent has submitted a representation to the second respondent – District Collector, Anantapur, stating that the petitioners are in illegal possession of the land belongs to him and that based on such representation, the second respondent has addressed a letter to the fourth respondent – Station House Officer, Kuderu Police Station, to conduct enquiry thereon and pursuant thereto, the fourth respondent directed them to produce title deeds with regard to the land in question. This Court while issuing notice before admission on 31.12.2009, directed respondents 1 to 4 not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the fifth respondent without following due process of law. Although no counter-affidavit is filed, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home produced a letter, dated 18.01.2010 addressed by the fourth respondent to the Government Pleader for Home, and stated that the police officials have neither interfered with the land in question nor taken any steps to dispossess the petitioners from the land covered by Survey Nos.518-1, 520-1, 567-3A, 419-A2 and 548AB situated at Kammuru Village, Kuderu Mandal, Anantapur District. Even from a perusal of the representation submitted by the fifth respondent, it is clear that the dispute relates to private property. In view of the same, if the fifth respondent is having any grievance with regard to claim, title or possession of the land in question, it is open to him to approach appropriate forum or Court of law for redressal of his relief, but on the basis of the representation filed by him, no interference can be made by respondents 1 to 4 with regard to the possession of the petitioners over the land in question. In that view of the matter, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners over the land covered by the above-mentioned survey numbers. Subject to the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. However, it is made clear that this order will not preclude the fifth respondent to approach competent forum or Court of law for redressal of his grievance. No order as to costs. ______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 6th JULY, 2010. kvni