THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32762 of 2010 Date:08.02.2011 Between: Kathi Mutyalu and others ..... Petitioners AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by the Divisional Forest Officer, West Godavari District and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri D. Srinivas Counsel for Respondent No.1:Assistant Government Pleader for Forests Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3: Smt. Jyothi Eswar Gogineni, standing counsel for APEPDCL The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition filed for a mandamus to set aside the letter dated 01.11.2010 of respondent No.1 is wholly misconceived. The impugned proceedings are in the nature of a letter addressed by the Divisional Forest Officer, West Godavari to the Superintendent Engineer, A.P.E.P.D.C.L., wherein he has asserted that the land in question is included in the forest block and that the electricity supply to the same is disconnected. The petitioners, who claim to have made an application for release of power supply, have questioned this letter on the ground that respondent No.2 acting upon the said letter is not releasing the power supply. Curiously, no relief against respondent No.2 for release of power supply has been claimed in the writ petition. As the impugned proceedings do not determine the rights of the petitioners, I do not find any reason to entertain this writ petition filed questioning its legality. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh writ petition claiming appropriate relief. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.41625 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 08th February, 2011 GHN