IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 13 OF 2010 MRS. ANGELINA FERNANDES AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus MR. PETER BARRETO AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Shivan Dessai, Advocate for the petitioners. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 18th January, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr. Dessai, learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2. By this petition, the petitioners challenge the order dated 20th April, 2010 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Canacona dismissing the objections raised by the Judgment Debtor. By the impugned order, the learned Judge has rejected the following objections taken by the petitioners : (i) That order passed on application for temporary injunction sought to be executed cannot be termed as a 'decree' and (ii) That since the evidence of the plaintiffs was closed by this Court for non payment of costs imposed, the JD's are discharged from liability of payment of costs. 3. Having heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and having perused the record, I am of the considered opinion that no case has been made out by the petitioners for exercise of revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 of C.P.C. In my opinion, the findings given by the Executing Court, cannot be said to be patently illegal or without jurisdiction warranting interference by this Court in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. No jurisdictional error is committed by the Executing Court while passing the impugned order. Hence, the application is dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA