1 28 D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL NO.110/2007. [BHAG SINGH & ANR.vS STATE OF RAJ. & ORS.] DATED : 01.03.2007 HON'BLE MR. RAJESH BALIA, J. HON'BLE MR. CHATRA RAM JAT, J. Mr.H.S.Sidhu for the appellant. ***** Heard learned counsel for the appellant. We find no merit in this appeal. The appeal is directed against the allowing of application for impleading the respondent No.4 as a party to the writ petition filed by the petitioner at whose instance the proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner. The petitioner grievance is that respondent No.4 cannot be considered to be necessary party. Even if the respondent No.4 is considered to be necessary party his interest in the lis is apparent and his being a proper party cannot be doubted. In that view of the matter, the substance of the order of allowing respondent No.4 to be impleaded as party does not call for interference. The appeal is therefore dismissed in limine. [CHATRA RAM JAT]J. [RAJESH BALIA], J. mamta