IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M. No. M-32393 of 2008 Date of decision : 3.3.2009. ... Joseph Eldridge and another ................ Petitioners vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Ajit Atri, Advocate for the petitioners. Sh. P.K. Khindria, Standing Counsel for U.T., Chandigarh. Sh. Ravi Sharma, Advocate for the complainant ... K.C. Puri, J. (Oral) This is a petition for quashing on the basis of compromise. Report of the trial Court has been received, in which it is mentioned that volunteer compromise has been arrived at between the parties. On the last date of hearing, it was pointed out by the Standing Counsel for U.T., Chandigarh that Ravinder Singh s/o Late Nachhater Singh r/o # 730/B, Phase 11, Mohali, was also one of the complainant, who made similar allegations. Affidavit of Ravinder Singh, identified by Sh. Ravi Sharma, Advocate, has been placed on the file, in which it is mentioned that he has also compromised with the petitioners. Crl.M. No. M-32393 of 2008 -2- At this juncture, Standing counsel for U.T., Chandigarh has stated at the Bar that he has no objection to the acceptance of compromise. In view of the above circumstances, and in view of authority reported as Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, FIR No. 211 dated 8.6.2006 under Sections 406/420/120-B IPC and Section 24 of the Immigration Act, registered at Police Station Sector 34, Chandigarh, stands quashed. Further proceedings, in pursuant to that FIR also stand quashed. ( K.C. Puri ) 3.3.2009. Judge chug