hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL SIDE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 669 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 163 OF 2007 Manubhai P. Vashi ... Petitioner Versus Registrar General, High Court & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Satish Narwade i/by M.P. Vashi & Associates for Petitioner. Mr. Vineet Naik with Mr. V.S. Kapse for R. No. 1. Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleader for State. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 18, 2010 P.C. We are informed that the Bombay High Court Process Fees Rules 2006 which are framed pursuant to the provisions of the Bombay Court Fees Act,. 1959 have been stayed and not been operated at the principal seat at Mumbai and Benches at Aurangabad and Nagpur. It is pointed out that as such the same should also be made applicable to the courts subordinate to this court. On behalf of Respondent No. 1 the learned counsel fairly concedes that that order should also apply to the subordinate courts. In the light of that order dated 5.3.2007 will also be applicable to all courts subordinate to this court. Motion disposed of accordingly. Writ Petition to be placed on board along with W.P. No. 1928 of 2007 and other petitions. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)