IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21553 of 2011 Sharfuddin Mansoori son of Late Shamsuddin, Resident of Mohalla Mogalpura (Suleman Ganj), Police Station Sasaram Town, District Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through its Secretary, Department of Pariwahan. 2. The Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Sultan Palace (Pariwahan Bhawan), Birchand Patel Road, Patna. 3. The Chief Accounts Officer, B.S.R.T. Corporation, Sultan Palace/Pariwahan Bhawan, Birchand Patel Road, Patna. 4. The Divisional Manager, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Bankipur, Patna Division, Patna. 5. The Divisional Accounts Officer, B.S.R.T. Corporation, Bankipur, Patna Division, Patna. 6. The Depo Superintendent, B.S.R.T. Corporation, Arrah, District Bhojpur, Bihar. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2. 5.12.2011. Heard Mr. Md. Ataul Haque, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ranjan Kumar Dubey, learned A.C. to G.P.23 appearing on behalf of respondent no.1/State and Shri Jaynendra Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 to 6/Bihar State Road Transport Corporation. The petitioner, who retired on 31.7.2009 as Assistant from Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, has prayed for directing the respondents to pay all his retiral dues. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, for the claim mentioned in the writ petition, the 2 petitioner has also approached the authority concerned. However, till date, neither any decision has been taken on his representation nor retiral dues have been paid. With the consent of parties, the writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2/Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation within a period of six weeks from today in respect of claim made in the present writ petition. If such representation is filed, respondent no.2 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no.2 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.2 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. 3 With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)