THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.1092 OF 2010 19th January, 2011. Between: K.DARGAIAH AND ANOTHER .. APPELLANTS AND THE COLLECTOR (CIVIL SUPPLIES) WARANGAL AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.1092 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) Appellants/petitioners have challenged the notification dated 10.11.2008 inviting applications for the vacant Fair Price Shop dealers but in essence their grievance is against the reduction of number of cards which is a consequence of bifurcation of Fair Price Shop but fact of the matter is that bifurcation is not questioned at all by the appellants-writ petitioners, notwithstanding the fact that bifurcation was notified to the public. Suffice it to say that in absence of any challenge to the bifurcation impugned notification inviting applications for Fair Price Shop dealers cannot be interfered with. For another reason also interference is not possible because the main ground of challenge is sought to be founded on failure of the respondents to put the appellants/writ petitioners on notice before directing bifurcation, a contention rightly turned down by the learned single Judge by relying upon the judgment of the Apex Court in DISTRICT COLLECTOR v. B.SURESH[1] mandate whereof does not make issuance of notice mandatory. Dismissed. (VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR,J) (NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ) 19th January, 2011. Nagesh babu THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.1092 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (PER THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU) 19th January, 2011. [1] 2000(1) ALD 9 (SC)