IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 20897 of 2005 BETWEEN: Ravi Kumar Sanghi, S/o. Amarnath, R/o.21-6-49, Ghansi Bazar, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 2 The S.H.O., P.S., Charminar, Hyderabad. 3 Suraj Bhan Sharma, S/o. Jagdish Pershad Sharma, R/o.21-6-49, Ghansi Bazar, Hyderabad. 4 Radha Shyam Sharma, S/o. Jagdish Pershad Sharma, R/o.21-6-49, Ghansi Bazar, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to pass an order or orders one in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the inaction of the respondent no.2 for calling for the petitioner into the police station and harassing the petitioner on the investigation of the respondent No. 3 and 4 without any reason when the matter is subjudiced before the Civil Court in O.S.No.3275/99 before the XIX Junior civil Judge, City Civil court, Hyderabad and the Rent control Proceedings in R.C.No.145/2000 before the III Addl. Rent Controller, Hyderabad in respect of land bearing No.21-6-49 admeasuring 190sq.yards situated at Ghansi Bazar, Hyderabad and further not to threatened the petitioner to withdraw the criminal case in C.C.No.31/2004 before the II M.M. Court, Nampally, Hyderabad and declare the same as totally illegal, arbitrary against the principle of natural justice pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SREEDHAR KAMLEKAR Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: Petitioner submits that in respect of the civil disputes between him and the unofficial respondents, the official respondents are threatening him at the instance of the unofficial respondents. 2. Counter has been filed stating that the police never interfered with the civil disputes of the petitioner and they never attempted to settle the civil proceedings or threatened the petitioner to withdraw the criminal case in C.C.No.31 of 2004. It is stated that all the allegations of the petitioner are incorrect and untrue. In fact, no case has been registered against the petitioner on the file of the Charminar Police Station; therefore, the question of calling the petitioner to the police station and harassing him does not arise. 3. In view of the categorical denial of the allegations stating that the police never harassed the petitioner and never interfered with the civil disputes in O.S.No.3275 of 1999, I am of the opinion that no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J May 1, 2008 DSK