Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP-T No.3294 of 2008. (OA No.1102/2006) Dated of Decision: June 26, 2009. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rumal Singh. ……… Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and another. …….. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. R.M.Bisht, Deputy Advocate General with Mr.Rajesh Mandhotra, Dy. Advocate General, for respondent No.1 to 3. Respondent No.4 ex parte. Deepak Gupta,J (oral) : The petitioner by means of this petition has challenged the order, whereby he was transferred from Bharmour to Churah on 27.3.2006. In fact, he was relieved from Bharmour on 28.3.2006, but after he filed the petition, both the orders were stayed by the erstwhile H.P. State Administrative Tribunal on 10th April, 2006. As per the averments made in the petition, the petitioner had already served at - 2 - Bharmour since 1996 onwards and prior to filing of the petition, the petitioner was posted at Bharmour for more than nine years. He has spent more than 12 years at Bharmour. No employee has a vested right to be posted at one station for such a long period of time. Therefore, the writ petition is rejected. The stay order is vacated. (Deepak Gupta) Judge (Surinder Singh) Judge June 26, 2009. (Pds)