HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.6202 OF 2010 ORDER: This criminal petition is filed by the petitioners, under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking to quash all further proceedings in Crl.R.P.No.45 of 2010 on the file of the I Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, passed an order dated 08.09.2009 in M.C.No.2 of 2009 restraining the petitioners and respondents herein from entering into the schedule property pending further orders. Subsequently, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate holding that the petitioners are entitled to possession over the schedule property and the title and possession under Section 145(6) Cr.P.C was also decided in their favour with regard to the said property by the IV Addl. District Judge, Visakhapatnam, in O.S.No.30 of 2003, disposed of M.C.No.2 of 2009 on 05.06.2010 ordering that the petitioners be put in possession of the schedule property. As against the said order, the respondents herein preferred Crl.R.P.No.45 of 2010 before the I Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, and the learned Sessions Judge ordered suspension of execution of the order dated 05.06.2010 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate till disposal of the revision petition in Crl.M.P.No.148 of 2010 on 03.08.2010. Being aggrieved thereby, the petitioners filed this criminal petition. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the impugned order is passed in the nature of final order and there is no scope to vacate the said order. He further submitted that without giving any opportunity to the petitioners to put forth their case, the learned Sessions Judge passed the impugned order. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that if it is the grievance of the petitioners, the learned Sessions Judge may be directed to dispose of the revision petition. This Court perused the impugned order. The learned Sessions Judge, instead of granting interim order, passed the impugned order in the nature of final order. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the criminal petition can be disposed of with a direction to the Sessions Judge to decide the criminal revision petition at the earliest. Accordingly, the criminal petition is disposed of directing the I Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, to dispose of Crl.R.P.No.45 of 2010 within a period of one (1) month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The counsel appearing for both parties herein also are directed to conclude their arguments on the date fixed by the learned Sessions Judge. __________________ RAJA ELANGO, J 16th August, 2010 CBS HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.6202 of 2010 (Disposed of ) 16th August, 2010 CBS