IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31177 of 2008 GAJENDRA SHAHI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 20/8/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In this renewed prayer for anticipatory bail under Sections- 420 and 120B of I.P.C., learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail was granted earlier subject to deposit of the amount in question. For reasons of his failure to deposit the amount, the petitioner has remained in custody since 10.9.2006 for one and a half years more from the date that the conditional bail was granted which he could not avail. Considering that the allegations are of financial embezzlement only and the period of custody undergone, let the petitioner Gajendra Shahi be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Muzzafarpur in Complaint Case No.3102/04 (T.R. No.754/06). KC ( Navin Sinha,J )