IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.15963 of 2011 BETWEEN Nara Harikrishna. ... PETITIONER AND The District Collector, Anantapur District and two others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. M. PRASADA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: Petitioner has not even presented the document for registration but seeks a Mandamus that the third respondent be directed to receive the document and register the same. 2. The prayer, in my view, is totally misconceived, as the petitioner must present a document first before the Sub-Registrar and thereafter the Registrar has to act as per the law declared by this Court in G. NARSAIAH v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH[1]. If the Registrar seeks to return the document on any objection outside the Registration Act, the petitioner has his remedies available. The writ petition is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J July 13, 2011 Note: Furnish C.C. of the order by 15.07.2011 (B/o) DSK [1] AIR 2011 AP 101