IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.73 of 2007 --------- Masawar Hussain, son of Abdul Satar, Resident of village – Uzara Nrainpur, Police station – Uchakagon, District – Gopalganj ……….. Petitioner - Appellant Versus 1. The United India Insurance Company Limited through the Regional Manager Chanakya Commerical complex Near R. Block, Patna. 2. The Senior Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Divisional Office, Sureksha Bhawan, Akharaghat Road, Muzaffarpur 3. The Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Divisional Office, Sureksha Bhawan, Akharaghat Road, Muzaffarpur, Pin 842001 4. Sanjiv Agrawal son of Sri Ram Prasad Bhoj Agrawal Director of M/s Shrachi Securities Ltd, 1-15, India Exchange Place Extension Kolkata – 700073 …….. Respondents – Respondents. ----------- For the appellant: Mr. Udit Narayan Singh, Advocate Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate Mrs. Poonam Kumari, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate -------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ---------- Dated, the 21st October, 2008. We heard Mr. Udit Narayan Singh, counsel for the appellant. 2. Single Judge has considered all the three contentions raised by the petitioner before him in right perspective justifying no - 2 - interference by us. 3. It is pertinent to notice that the Single Judge observed that if the petitioner had paid entire hire charges and the final consideration for transfer, the vehicle would have been his and he would have been entitled to the insurance claim as well but that was not done and the vehicle remained to be the property of the financer and the compensation received from insurance is also to enure to the benefit of the financer. 4. We concur with the view of the Single Judge. Letters Patent Appeal does not deserve to be admitted. It is dismissed in limine. R.M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J. Anil/