WP(C) 3590/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B K SHARMA Heard Mr. P Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R C hakraborty, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the Tender Notice dated 20.05.2010 by which, tenders have been invited for settlement of G arjuli Weekly Market for the period of 01.07.2009 to 30.06.2010. Although the Te nder Notice was issued on 20.05.2010, the petitioner has approached this Court a fter more than one month from the said date and that too at a time when in respo nse to the said Tender Notice, the last date of date of which was 21.06.2010, te nders must have been opened. The only ground urged towards assailing the said Te nder Notice is that the representation made by the petitioner for extension of t he terms of the weekly market has not been disposed of. Be it stated here that t he petitioner is the sitting lessee, whose term will expire on 30.06.2010. The r epresentation is dated 20.05.2010 (Annexure-E) and the only ground urged for ext ension of the settlement period is the alleged frequent bandh calls given by var ious organisations. I am afraid such a ground cannot be a ground for extension o f settlement period, more so, when a fresh tender process has already been initi ated and is at the verge of finalisation. In view of the above, no interference is call for with the impugned Tend er Notice dated 20.05.2010 and accordingly, no relief can be granted to the peti tioner. Writ petition is dismissed.