IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH AUGUST 2010 / 19TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 23288 of 2010(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. JOLLY C.G.S/O. K.M.GEORGE,AGED 63, CHAKKEDATH, PANCODE KARA, AIKARANAD VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. SUNNY C.G. S/O.K.M.GEORGE, AGED 62, CHAKKEDATH, PANCODE KARA, AIKARANAD VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. SOMAN C.G. S/O. K.M.GEORGE, AGED 61, CHAKKEDATH, PANCODE KARA, AIKARANAD VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK,ERNAKULAM DIST. 4. CAPT.DR.GEORGE SELVARAJ ALIAS DR.SELVARAJ, S/O.K.M.GEORGE, AGED 57 YEARS, CHAKKEDATH, PANCODE KARA, ALIKARANAD VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DIST. 5. SUNIL C.G. S/O.K.M.GEORGE AGED 47, CHAKKEDATH, PANCODE KARA, AIKARANAD VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. SHAJI C.S. S/O. DECEASED SAJU C.G., AGED 24 YEARS, CHAKKEDATH, PANCODE KARA, AIKARANAD VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MRS.GIGI SUNIL. BY ADV. SRI.SAJI MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE TAHSILDAR, KUNNATHUADU TALUK OFFICE PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, KUNNATHUNADU, TALUK OFFICE, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK OFFICE, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DIST. 4. THE VILLAGE OFIER, AIKKARANADU NORTH VILLAGE OFFICE, KADAYIRIPPU, PANCODE P.O. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 23288 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 10th day of August, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioners' grievance in this writ petition is that their application for mutation in respect of properties devolved by succession on them is not being considered by the 1st respondent. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that no application for mutation has been received in the office of the 1st respondent. He further submits that if an application is received, it will be attended to and an order in accordance with the Transfer of Registry Rules, would be passed. In view of the said submission, counsel for the petitioners submits that the said submission may be recorded and the writ petition may be closed. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.