1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 358 OF 2009 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 413 OF 2008 Sou. Sushila Rangarao Kadam .. Applicant. V/s. Shri Kushappa Vithu Sapata (Deceased) through legal heirs .. Respondents. --- Mr.A.M.Adagule h/for R.P.Walvekar for the Applicant None for the Respondents. --- CORAM: K. K. TATED, J. DATE : 03RD FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C. 1. The present civil application is preferred by the original appellant/plaintiff for recalling the order dated 12th January, 2009 by which civil revision application came to be dismissed against the unserved respondents. 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant states that the applicant being an old lady, it remained on her part to find out immediately the correct address of the respondent no.1 For the reasons stated in para-6 of the civil 2 application, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads as under : (a) that the order dated 12.01.2009 be kindly recall/ set aside and the Revision be kindly restored against the respondent no.1 and further fresh notice be kindly issued to respondent no.1 on the address mentioned in para 5 hereinabove. 3. Civil application is disposed of accordingly. (K. K. TATED,J.) -----