^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) FIRST APPEAL N0. \11 OF 2011 ^' APPELLANT 'Defendant y/ ^^y^^ Darima, Tahsil ^<y>^ sa^uja (C-G-) ^Dharam Sai, S/o late Bihari Ram, aged about 50 years, Caste Koier, R/o Village Sohga, Police Station Ambikapur, District ^???^ ^•^ " RESPONDENT Plaintiff VERSUS Rampyare Ram Kushwaha, S/o late Pancham Ram, aged about 66 years, Occupation Retired Teacher and Agriculture, Caste Koier, R/o Village Karji, Police Station Darima, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) FIRST APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.1908 ^s^ 1 1 ^sy"^ g V^4^^ ^ HE^H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FIR^T APPBAL iPRi N0. 1391 OF 2011 ;~ i ^ \77 (lt APPELLANT/ : Dliai-aiu Sai Defendsuit RE^PONDENTS/ PLAINTIFF Versus Raiiipyai'e Raiii Kuslivvaiia FZRST AFFBAL U/S 96 OF THE CGDE OF CIViL PROCEDURE, 1908 Sinede Bench: Hon?bie Shri G. MinhaiuddmA J. Fresenfc; None for the appeUaiit. GRAL ORDER (Passed on 03rd day ofAugust, 2011) List is ueing revised. Case called out twice. 2. No one is present to press tliis appeal. 3. In view of tiie above, I have no other option except to dismlss this appeal in tlie absence of aiiy one for tiie appellant. 4. Therefore, tlie appeal is dlsmlssed for iion- prosecution. | 1 SdA G. Minhajuddin j Judge Kvr