IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2009 / 20TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 28683 of 2009(E) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------------- 1. K.C.REGI, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, IIV UP SCHOOL, MALIPPURAM, RESIDING AT KALLIPARAMBIL, KARUTHEDOM, MALIPPURAM P.O, 682 511. 2. A.S.MARY SINDHU, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, IIV UP SCHOOL, MALIPPURAM, RESIDING AT ATTIPPETTY HOUSE, PUTHUVYPPU, 682508. BY ADVS.MR.P.SREEKUMAR MR.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) MR.P.S.SIDHAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VYPIN. 4. THE MANAGER, IIV UP SCHOOL, MALIPPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.MUHAMOOD T.T THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.28683 OF 2009 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of October, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioners herein are working as UPSAs in the 4th respondent's school. They have got continuous service from 02.06.2004. Prior to their continuous service, they had rendered temporary service in the school against leave vacancies and all those services other than their appointment to the leave vacancies that arose on 04.08.2003 to 28.11.2003 were approved. 2. Exhibit P3 is the communication rejecting the approval in favour of the 1st petitioner and Exhibit P3(a) is the communication in favour of the 2nd petitioner. The rejection of approval was in respect of Exhibits P1 and P2 appointments. 3. The Manager took up the matter in appeal before the 2nd respondent. It was rejected as per Exhibits P4 and P5. The petitioners were not aware about the rejection of appeals. Finally, they have filed revision petitions as per Exhibits P6 and W.P.(C) No.28683/2009 2 P7. The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 1st respondent to take a decision on Exhibits P6 and P7. Heard the learned Government Pleader also. There will be a direction to the 1st respondent to take a decision on Exhibits P6 and P7 along with revision petition if any filed by the Manager, after hearing the petitioner and the Manager, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp