CAW/3035/2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3035 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5056 OF 2008 Rajkumar Hari Gadgil & Anr. ... Applicants V/s. Vadgaon Saraf Vyapari Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Mydt., Kolhapur & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Amit Borkar for the Applicants. Mr. P.D. Dalvi for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE : 20 TH DECEMBER, 2010. P.C. : 1. The Civil Application has been filed for clarification of the order dated 7th October, 2008. By this order, I had observed as follows in paragraph No.5 : “5. In my opinion, once the amount has been admittedly reduced to Rs.16,50,000/­, the petitioners will have to deposit Rs. 16,50,000/­ and not Rs.20,00,000/­. In any event, Rs.7 lacs have already been deposited with the respondent. The petitioner shall deposit the balance amount payable under Rule 107(14) within four weeks from today. If such deposit is made within the stipulated period, the revision shall be entertained on merits.” CAW/3035/2010 2 2. A dispute has arisen whether the petitioner, i.e. the applicant herein, is required to deposit the balance amount payable under Rule 107(14) besides the amount of Rs.9,50,000/­. 3. After hearing the parties for some time, in my view, it is obvious that the sentence “The petitioner shall deposit the balance amount payable under Rule 107(14) within four weeks from today.” has wrongly been inserted and it should read as “the petitioner shall deposit the balance amount payable as aforesaid within four weeks from today.” 4. The Civil Application is disposed of.