IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST APRIL 2009 / 11TH CHAITHRA 1931 RP.No. 346 of 2009(H) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.6511/2009 Dated 27/02/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER: --------------------------------------------- P.T. HUSSAIN, S/O. ABDU HAJI, AGED 40 YEARS, PALLIYALITHODI HOUSE, KALIKAVU, MALAPPURAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,MALAPPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ R.P.No.346 OF 2009 IN W.P.(C) NO. 6511 OF 2009 (H) ===================== Dated this the 1st day of April, 2009 O R D E R The modification sought is that since the power to consider belated application for renewal has been delegated to the respondent, the direction to consider Ext.P2 should be to the respondent and not the RTA. 2. If as stated, there has been a delegation as contended by the counsel for the petitioner in terms of Rule 133 of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Rules, it is directed that it will be open to the respondent himself to consider the application. With the above clarification, the review petition is disposed of. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp