IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18908 of 2010 KALI SINGH, S/O Late Lakhan Singh, resident of Colony No.1, Durgasthan, Katihar, District-Katihar.....................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR.........................................Opposite Party. ----------- 3. 05.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case for the offence under Sections 39, 40, 43,48A, 49(A)(B) and 51 of the Wild Life (protection)Act,1972. It is alleged that five tortoises were recovered from Rohan Singh and Rohan Singh in his statement gave the petitioner’s name. It is submitted that though Rohan Singh is brother of the petitioner but there is dispute going on between the petitioner and Rohan Singh and due to that dispute he has named the petitioner moreover Rohan Singh was earlier involved in similar type of case in Case No. CII 57 of 2006 as mentioned in paragraph no. 9 of the petition and this petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Though the case is of the year 2006 but the cognizance has been taken on 20.02.2010. Considering the fact that no recovery was made from the petitioner and his name 2 sprang up in the statement of the arrested accused, let the petitioner, Kali Singh, be released on bail on his surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Case No. C II 125 of 2006 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Katihar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)