/_‘ F3‘R. i3 Wrii §3etiiion g$§ No. W49 of 2368 (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of ihe Ccnstim’ticn cf mdia) SB: Hon’b!e Mr. Sah‘sh K. gnihotri, J. Dr. Sanjee’t Sharma, counsei for the petéiioner. Shri Nok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate f9! the State. Present: $RAL 9RDER {Passed an 17-3-2058} With consent of $eamed counsei aspean'ng fer bath the parties, the matter is heard fmaiiy. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petittuner submits that the petitioner was posted as Pam/art in Patwari Haika No.22. Gadapei, Taheti enc Distt. Bantewaea. The petitioner has been transferred to Baster, Dist. Qeetar, vtde orderdated 25-6~2007 (Annexure Pit). 3) Learned ccunset appearing for the eetitioner as weii as for the tatelrespondents . .iointi submitthatthe facts and q uestten of iawmvoived tnthe petition are the same to that of Writ Petition (S) 5526 of 2%? Framed Kumar 3mm Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others} whicewas deposed of by order Peiitioner Sum: Kumar Kashyap, 1’0. 3hr: S‘m‘os Kashyap; abaut aged abaut 34 years} accupatinn, Service, posted as §’atwari, 3i Haika Gadapa; Tahsé’t — Dantewada, Disa‘ Bastar Dantewada (CG). ‘ Versus Resgondems The State of - Chhattisgarh) through :‘ne Smretary, Department of Rex/ewe, DKS‘ Bhawan, Raigur (CG; The Coilector, Damewada, Gigi Damewada (CG). Sub Giviss'onai Qfricer, (R$\/enue}, Baniewad‘a, Digit. Dani‘swada (CG). Tahsitdar, f £0 daied 144-2908. Laamed comma further gasbmits ihaf fhig petitisn may be disposed of in the same terma 4) m View cf the above-stated submission made hy learned ceunsei appearing for the games, i?wr£€ pettian is dispcsed cf in me tsame ‘teyms La, *he respondents are direc€ed to make smtabSe arramgement within a pericd Df faur weeks far reiéeving and anowing the pefiticner to join his new piace 0f pcs’réng, L L subject to verification of me facts” NO crder astc costs, M“ A 7":Vrf Sdl— I , L O, I W Satish K. Agmhmm Raju Judge‘ 7 x