IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.8525 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 13, 2011. Raksha Devi .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.J.S.Lalli, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.J.S.Puri, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.J.S.Puri, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioner who is working as Pharmacist in the Community Health Centre, Model Town, Patiala, seeks quashing of the order dated 9.12.2010 (Annexure P-1) whereby her pay has been re-fixed after withdrawing the 18/24 years proficiency step up(s). During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by a decision dated 31.3.2010 rendered by this Court in Civil Writ Petition CWP No.8525 of 2011 [2] No.18754 of 2007 (Amarjit Singh versus State of Punjab and others). The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the afore-stated decision of this Court in Amarjit Singh's case (supra). Dasti. May 13, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE