1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5442 OF 2008 (G.B. Tilakraj Narayanswami Naidu vs. The Nagpur Municipal Corporation and others) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 14, 2009 Heard Shri Kulkarni, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Mishra, learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2. Shri Kulkarni, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that petitioner has already submitted representation/complaint dated 28.7.2008 to the Assistant Commissioner, Mangalwadi Zone, Nagpur against the unauthorised construction alleged to have been carried out by the respondent nos. 3 and 4. However, till this date, no decision has been taken by the Assistant Commissioner and, therefore, petitioner has filed the present petition. Shri Mishra, learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2, for want of instructions is unable to assist this Court. However, the learned 2 Counsel states that if the above referred representation/complaint has not been decided by the competent Authority, same would be decided in accordance with law after giving hearing to the petitioner as well as respondent nos. 3 and 4 at the earliest. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, cause of action no more survives. The petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE khj