IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14871 of 2009 DINESH SINGH @ BIDYANAND Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 16.6.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under Sections 468, 477 and 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named as an accused in the F.I.R. and the allegation is that on secret information the informant, who is Officer-Incharge of Rupaspur Police Station, went to the place of occurrence and saw two persons fleeing away from the Scorpio vehicle, who were apprehended and they were named as accused in the F.I.R. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that the name of the petitioner was taken by the said co-accused alleging that the petitioner was coming to purchase the said vehicle. Learned counsel for the petitioner also avers that neither the petitioner was named as accused in the case nor cognizance was taken against him. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further states that even according to the prosecution case, neither the petitioner was ever in possession of the said vehicle nor he had any concern with it and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. In case 2 of surrender/arrest within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in the court below, petitioner, namely, Dinesh Singh @ Bidyanand shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Danapur in connection with Rupaspur P.S.case No.104 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Narendra/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )