IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.583 of 2008 NAVEEN YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 5.8.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is in custody in Thakurganj P.S. Case No.,65 of 2008 under sections 452,307,450,511 and 120 of the I.P.C. and section 302 of I.P.C. was added later on. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is contradiction in the instant F.I.R. lodged by one Munna Gupta @ Sheo Prakash Gupta. Learned counsel submits that in the F.I.R. it has been alleged that on14.4.2008 at 1.30 P.M. this petitioner entered into the house of Asha Devi, wife of Late Jai Prakash Gupta and sprinkled kerosene oil on her body and set her on fire. She was crying to save her life. After sometime the petitioner alongwith the driver of Marshal vehicle, namely Sunil Kumar came with the vehicle and took away Asha Devi on the pretext of providing treatment despite objection raised by the informant and others. Learned counsel submits that if the accusations wwould have been true, the petitioner would not have been allowed to take victim Asha Devi for treatment . The aforesaid Munna Gupta has also lodged an F.I.R. dated 18.5.2000 against his brother, Jai Prakash Gupta and his wife, Asha Devi,.As such it it becomes suspicious as to how Munna Gupta has lodged the instant case for injujries on person of Asha Devi. Learned counsel submits that it is petitioner who has got Asha Devi treated as would appear from documents contained in - 2 - Annexure-3 series . Learned counsel submits that taking advantage of the same the informant, Munna Gupta has implicated the petitioner in the instant case. Learned counsel for the State submits that from Annexure-2 it would appear that the informant is having enmity with Jay Prakash Gupta and his wife. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the police is not investigating the case in proper manner and is acting in collusion with the real culprits to protect them and to implicate the petitioner. Iit would be open to the petitioner to file representation before the superior police officials for their consideration. With the aforesaid observation this writ application is disposed of. AnilKsinha ( S.P.Singh,J.)