IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER MONDAY, THE 10TH DECEMBER 2007 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 205 of 1999() ----------------------------- SC.147/1996 of II ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, KOLLAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER: PW2 --------------------------------- SALIM, S/O.MUHAMMADKUTTY KOCHUKUNNATHU VEEDU, KULAPPADAM NEDUMBANA CHERRY, NEDUMBANA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.V.N.ACHUTHA KURUP (SR.) SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR RESPONDENTS: ACCUSED NOS. 1 TO 5, 7 & 8 AND COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. KAREEM, S/O.KOYAKUNJU MELATHIL VEEDU NEDUMPANA CHERRY (NOW RESIDING PALLIVADAKKATHIL VEEDU NEDUMPANA VILLAGE. 2. JAHAMKIR @ JAHAN, S/O.NOOR MOHAMMED PARAVILA VEEDU, MUTTAKKAVU CHERRY KULAPPADAM, NEDUMPARA VILLAGE. 3. NIZAMUDEEN @ NIZAM, S/O.SHAMSUDEEN THADAVILA PADINJATTATHIL NEDUMPANA VILLAGE. 4. NAZEER, S/O.YOOSUF KUNJU ASARITHODIYIL VEEDU, KHADI JUNCTION MUTTAKKAVU CHERRY, NEDUMPANA VILLAGE. 5. ANWAR BABU @ ANWAR, S/O.ABDUL RAHIM SALIM NIVAS, NEAR KHADI JUNCTION NEDUMPANA CHERRY, NEDUMPANA VILLAGE. 6. RAHIM, S/O.HASSANARU KUNJU VADAKKANTAZHIKATHU PUTHEN VEEDU NEAR KUZHIMATHIKKAD SCHOOL PAZHANGOLAM CHERRY, NEDUMPANA VILLAGE. CRRP205/99 7. NAJEEM, S/O.ABOOBAKER KUTTY PARAVILA VEEDU, KULAPPADAOM NEDUMPANA VILLAGE. 8. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.M.NAZAR SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: A.K.BASHEER, J. --------------------------------------------- Crl.R.P.No.205 of 1999 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of December, 2007 ORDER The revision petitioner who was examined as PW2 in SC No.147/96 on the file of the Second Additional Sessions Court, Kollam had preferred this revision petition challenging the adequacy of sentence imposed on respondents 1 to 7 who were arraigned as accused Nos.1 to 5, 7 and 8 in the above case. According to the petitioner, he had also sustained injuries in the incident which culminated in the above case. 2. When this revision petition came up for consideration today, it is brought to my notice that the appeal preferred by the accused against the order of conviction and sentence as Crl.A.No.882/98 had already been heard and disposed of by this court vide judgment dated 19th September, 2007. The learned counsel submits that in view of the above intervening development this revision petition is not pressed. Therefore, the R.P. is dismissed as not pressed. A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE csl