IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 7TH APRIL 2009 / 17TH CHAITHRA 1931 AS.No. 694 of 1998(C) --------------------- OS.659/1992 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,KOZHIKODE .................... APPELLANT(S)/SUPPLEMENTAL PLAINTIFF: -------------- KIZHAKKE VENGOT RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, SREE NILAYAM, KOLLAM, P.O.KOYILANDY. BY ADV. SRI.R.K.MURALEEDHARAN RESPONDENT(S)/DEFENDANTS 2 TO 9: --------------- 1. K.V.AMBUJAKSHI AMMA, PARANNUR, CHERUPALAM, VIA.NANMANDA, MAYYANKANDIYIL HOUSE. (*)[2. K.V.BALAMANI, “ROHINI”, PARANNUR AMSOM, DESOM, PARANNUR P.O., VIA.NAIRKKUNI. 3. V.K.B.SANDEEPAN, -O- 4. VALIYARAMBATH KARUNAKARA KURUP, -DO- 5. K.V.BALACHANDRAN, “VYSAKHI”, ERAVANNUR P.O., VIA.NARIKKUNI. 6. K.V.VIJAYAN, MAYYANKANDI HOUSE, P.O.PONNUR, CHERUPALAM, VIA.NANMANDA. 7. K.V.AJITHA, THAZHAPOYIL HOUSE, P.O.ERAVANNUR, VIA.NARIKKUNI. 8. ALYANKANDI NARAYANANKUTTY NAIR, SOUTH MALABAR GRAMEEN BANK, P.O.NARIKKUNI.] (*)RESPONDENTS 2 TO 8 ARE DELETED FROM THE ARRAY OF PARTIES IN THE APPEAL VIDE ORDER DATED 7.4.2009 ON IA NO.1432/2009. ADV. SRI.G.UNNIKRISHNON FOR R1 TO R3 & R5 TO R7 SRI.K.SANEESH KUMAR THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 7.4.2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- A.S.No.694 of 1998 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of April, 2009. JUDGMENT Heard counsel. 2. As per order dated 7.4.2009 in I.A.No.1432 of 2009 respondent Nos.2 to 8 stand deleted from the array of parties in the appeal. 3. Appellant and respondent No.1 filed I.A.No.1431 of 2009 under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure reporting settlement of the dispute between them outside the court and requesting that a decree may be passed in terms of the joint statement, in modification of the judgment and decree under challenge. 4. The compromise entered between the appellant and respondent No.1 is accepted. It is recorded. Resultantly, judgment and decree under challenge are set aside and a decree is passed in terms of the compromise. The compromise petition shall form part of the decree. 2 C.M.P.No.2668 of 2000 will stand dismissed. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, Judge. cks 3 Thomas P.Joseph, J. A.S.No.694 of 1998 JUDGMENT 7th April, 2009.