IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33468 of 2010 ROHIT KUMAR JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.09.10. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 19.06.2010 in a case registered under Section 414 of the I.P.C. and Sections 25(1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. It is alleged that from possession of petitioner four live cartridges, one old mobile and one Maruti Car was recovered. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the alleged recovered Maruti Car has been purchased by the petitioner and the matter is under registration before the Transport authority. The impugned order reflects that the petitioner is involved in two other cases. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Saharsa in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case 2 No. 62 of 2010. One of the bailors will be either father or mother of the petitioner. The learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner gets involved in similar nature of offence. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)