IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 22859 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 14.10.2011 Rakesh Kumar @ Vicky ...Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. A.K. Khunger, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Bajwa, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. …… RAJESH BINDAL, J. The only allegation against the petitioner in the present FIR is that 3 Kgs and 100 Grams of opium was recovered from his possession. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought to argue that in the re- port of Chemical Examiner, morphine contents in the alleged recovery are found to be 2.8% and the same being non-commercial, the petitioner is enti- tled to bail. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State placed reliance upon the judgment of this Court in Criminal Misc.-M No. 35827 of 2010- Amarjit Singh alias Goldy Vs. State of Punjab and another decided on 26.05.2011 and in Criminal Misc.-M No. 5037 of 2011-Dharminder Singh Vs. State of Haryana decided on 29.07.2011 and submitted that argument raised by learned counsel for the petitioner is totally mis-conceived, as the entire quantity recovered is to be considered and not exact content of mor- phine. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions noticed above, I do not find this to be a fit case for grant of bail to the petitioner at this stage. Dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 14.10.2011 sharmila