Cf E’s,W7” $§$§GLE mm: IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIL‘ASPUR ?57é 1. Smt. Gulab Ekka, W/o Poulus Ekka, aged about of village Bartori, Village Panchayat- Keradih, Tahsil- Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 2. Smt. Champa Bai, W/o Raja Ram, aged about 31 years,l R/o village — Katribahla, Village _ Panchayat— Kurkunga, Tahsil— Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 'Smt. Binaka Xaxa, W/o Anil Xaxa, aged about 29 W.P.(S) NO. / 2009 30 years, Resident / 3. years, Resident of Village ’ Pokhratoli, Panchayat— ' Thethetangan, Tahsil- Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur w (C.G.) 4. Smt. Kalostika Tigga, W/o Prakash Tigga, aged about 32 years R/o Village Uraonpara, Village Village ' Panchayat~ v Kharijhariya, Tahsil— Kunkuri, Distt. PETITIONERS .ashpur (C.G.) J RESPONDENTS VERSUS : 1. K State of Chhattisga'rh" , Through :- The Secretary, Panchayat ' and Rural Development, Department, D.K.S. BhaWan, Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Jashpur Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) Chief Executive v Officer, Janpad, Panchayat, Kunkuri, Distt. -'Jashpur (C.G.) Project Officer, Woman and Child Development Department Kunkuri,, 'Dis‘tt. Jashpur (C.G.) Smt. Sumitra Bai, W/o Late Amamath, aged about ‘34 years, R/o B'artori, Tahsil- Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) Smt. Manisha Kindo, W/o Sanjay Kindo, aged about 24‘ years, R/o Pokhratoli, Tahsil- Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) Smt. Prema Toppo, W/o Shri Agastus Toppo, aged about 36 years, R/o Village — Shrinagar Khari ‘Jhariya, Tahsil- Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) Smt. Lalita Kujur, W/o Edward Kujur, aged about 29 years, R/o Village — Bartofi, Tahsil- Kurikuri, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) Smt. Monica Minj, W/o Shri Jeevan Kishore Kujur, aged about 23 years, R/o village — Bahla (Kurkunga), Tahsil— Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE \ ONSTITUTION OF INDIA. C W _,GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition {S 2 No. 75 1 6 of 2009 Versus Petitioners Smt. Gulab Ekka & others Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & others (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotn' J.) Shn‘ N. K. Chattetjee, Advocate for the petitioners. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. - Shri C. Jayant K. Rae, Advocate and Shn' Harish Khuntiya, Advocate for Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Shri N. N. the Caveator. 0 R D E R (mu ( Passed on this 7th day ofmum, 2010 ) Heard. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State submits that the State of Chhattisgarh, Women and Child Development Department, Raipur has issued instructions on 2.4.2008 in regard to appointment of Anganwadi Karyakaita, Anganbadi Sahayika and Mini Anganbadi Karyakaita. Clause 11 ofthe above instructions provides for appeal. Sub clause (Ka) of Clause ll ofthe instructions reads as under: " 11. 6mm :— mmm/Wete‘ttngdaanumdanne / In View of the above, learned counsef appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to take recourse to the alternative forum, in accordance with law. Learned counsel appealing for the respondents/State has no objection. 1n View of the foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the above-stated liberty, if so advised. Thakur g