IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27015 of 2010 RAM DAYAL SAH, S/o Late Viro Sah, R/o Village – Lakhmaniya, P.S. – Balia, District - Begusarai. Versus STATE OF BIHAR. ----------- 3 04.03.2011 Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The petitioner who is the husband of deceased and in custody in Balia P.S. Case No. 189 of 2008 for the offence under Sections 304B, 201 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code has prayed for grant of bail. Sri Thakur submits that during investigation it has come that petitioner himself had telephonically informed the parents and family members of the deceased regarding the death. It was further submitted that the deceased was 4th wife of the petitioner. According to Sri Thakur, death had occurred at the time of delivery and thereafter dead body was cremated at a particular cremation place and as such Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code may not be applicable in the present case. Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, learned Additional Public Prosecutor while opposing the bail submits that it has come during investigation that despite the fact that parents of deceased had asked the petitioner to keep the dead body, in haste dead body was disposed of. In view of the facts and circumstances, I am not 2 inclined to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Petition for bail stands rejected. Praful /- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)