IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 13096 of 2009 Between: Polepeddi Atchanna Cheruvu Rep. by is Managing Trustree, Polepeddi Venkata, Panduranga Vittal, S/o. Late Sri Rama Murthy, Aged 52 Years, R/o. Kollur Village and Mandal, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Guntur District, Guntur. 3 Tahsildar, Kolluru Mandal Revenue Office, Kolluru, Guntur District. 4 The Gram Panchayat, Kolluru, Rep. by its Executive Officer, Kolluru, Guntur District. 5 The Revenue Inspector, Kolluru Mandal, Kollur, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the impugned action of the Respondents 3 to 5 under the administrative control of Respondents 1 and 2 in obstructing the petitioner from development and maintenance of the petitioner tank popularly known as Polepeddi Atchanna Cheruvu, situated in Sy.No. 724 of an extent of Ac. 16.90 cents, approximately 2 Kms. away from kollur on the road from Kollur to Chinnapuliveru, for the welfare of the general public without any authority and without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice etc and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the activities of the petitioner and grant such other relief or relief Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K.V.R.Krishna Sharma Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5: Government Pleader for Revenue Counsel for Respondent No.4: Sri M. Prabhakar Rao The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) The learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. 2. Permission is accorded. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to costs. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 2nd July, 2009 ks