1 ABA-722-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 722 OF 2011 1. Mr. Vijay Shankar Tawade ) 2. Mr. Bharti Suresh Pawar ).. Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mrs. Seema Shankar Tawade .. Respondent No.2. (Orig. complainant) Mr. E.B. Dixit i/b. P.R. Yadav, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Y.S.Shinde,APP for the respondent No.1 – State. Ms. Nayana Pardeshi, Advocate fr respondent No.2. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 27th September, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. On 29.8.2011, the learned Counsel for the applicants had made a statement that the applicants are willing to deposit 1/3rd share of the complainant/respondent No.2 in the sale proceeds and in the alternative, they are also willing to get the sale deed to the extent of the share of the complainant cancelled. The learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 makes a statement that the complainant is not agreeable to accept any of the two offers. According to her, 2 ABA-722-11.sxw the forged power of attorney was created and somebody impersonated her and put signature for her. The applicant No.1 is brother and applicant No.2 is sister of the complainant. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances, the custodial interrogation of the applicants does not appear to be necessary for investigation of the case. 3. In view of the above, the ad-interim anticipatory bail granted on 29.8.2011 is hereby made absolute Application stands disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)