BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twelfth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15923 of 2011 1 F.ABISHEIK 2 ILIYAS @ MOHAMED RIYASDEEN 3 MUTHAVALLI BASHEER AHAMED 4 MOHAMED RABEEK 5 ARABU ALI 6 JALAL @ JALALDEEN 7 ABBAS 8 UMAR ALI .. PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1,2,3,4,5,6,8 & 10 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VEDASANDUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT IN CR.NO. 357 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.MUTHALRAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- There is no representation for the petitioners. Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2.On careful perusal of the record and the submissions of the Additional Public Prosecutor, I could see that the petitioners were already granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.13139 of 2011 on 29.09.2011 and the petitioners could not furnish the sureties within the time as stipulated by this Court, since they are stated to be living in various places. The fact remains that the petitioners were granted anticipatory bail already and they did not avail the said anticipatory bail. Now, they are seeking for anticipatory bail for the second time by stating the reason that they could not furnish the sureties. 3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with the following conditions: 4.i)Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasanthur, Dindigul District, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions ii)that the petitioners shall appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. iii)The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. iv)The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. Sd/- 12/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VEDASANTHUR 2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEDASANDUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. S.MUTHALRAJ Advocate SR.No.43316 ssk/14.12.2011 /5c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15923 of 2011 Date :12/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/