IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.3306 of 1991 (O&M) Date of Decision:06.05.2009 Manjit Singh .......Petitioner Versus Capt. Kartar Singh ....Respondent Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Divanshu Jain, Advocate for Mr. Arun Palli, Sr. Advocate for the respondent. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. There is no representation for the petitioner either through Counsel or in person. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent as well as the landlord are present in Court. It is represented by learned counsel for the respondent that the tenant has actually surrendered possession of the property to the landlord and nothing survives for consideration in civil revision. The civil revision petition is dismissed based on the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent. There shall be, however, no direction as to costs. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE May 06, 2009 Pankaj*