IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30026 of 2008 1.TARNI YADAV, son of Late Luchho Yadav 2.RAVI YADAV @ RAVI KR. YADAV, Son of Tarni Yadav Both resident of Village Karela, P.S. Nathnagar, District Bhagalpur --------Petitioners Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 12.11.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Nathnagar P.S. Case No.112/2005 for the alleged offences registered under sections 386, 387, 364 and 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that although the petitioners are the named accused, but no specific allegation has been made against them. It is further submitted that there are series of land disputes between the parties for which a civil suit is pending. As such, the petitioners have been falsely implicated. The learned APP appearing on behalf of the State on going through the case diary submits that during investigation the victim boy has categorically stated the involvement of these petitioners along with the other co-accused, namely Vinay Yadav. It is further submitted that even during statement under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the name of the petitioners has been repeated. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I 2 am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. The application is, accordingly, rejected. However, on surrender, in case an application for bail is filed in the court below, the same would be considered on its own merits in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the present order. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)