IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19572 of 2011 1. Sabir Khan Son Of Late Abdul Rahim Khan Resident Of Village : Pakhnaha, P.S. & Block : Bairiya, District : West Champaran Versus 1. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary (Food) , Bihar At Patna 2. The Collector, West Champaran At Bettiah 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Bettiah, West Champaran 4. The District Supply Officer, West Champaran At Bettiah 5. The Sub Divisional Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran 6. The Block Development Officer, Bairiya, West Champaran 2 25.11.2011 The petitioner prays for quashing the order dated 20.9.2011 contained in memo no.1030 and 1031 issued by the Block Development Officer, Bairiya, West Champaran whereby he has been directed to refund the value of undistributed rice which was allotted to him under SGRY scheme at APL rate. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern the instant writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection, as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would deposit 20% of the value of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within six 2 KHAN weeks from today. The petitioner should also file a representation raising his grievance before the Block Development Officer, Bairiya, West Champaran within four weeks from today which would be disposed of by the authority concerned within further ten weeks. In the meanwhile, no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner. (S.P.Singh,J)