1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 54. CA/1028/2009 In FAST/26100/2008 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. V.D.Rakh, AGP for the applicant. Mr. S.P.Deshmukh, Adv., for respondent. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:1-2-2010 P.C.:- 1. Heard. There is delay of 980 days in causing to file appeal by the State. The application does not demonstrate any eventuality, inhibiting the appellant State in prosecuting the matter to prefer appeal. Incidentally, with the assistance of learned A.G.P., I have gone through the order under challenge. Before the learned Judge, there was sale instance in identically placed matter in LAR No.216/2000 Exh.34. The learned Judge has appreciated the same, including potentiality, fertility and utility of the land under acquisition. The enhancement is 2 not too disproportionate to invite any attention. Application for condonation of delay dismissed. No costs. Consequently, appeal is dismissed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE agp/1028-09ca