I N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAiTIsGARH AT BILAéPUR (cg), WRIT PETITION No. 5 €gcb /2oos Sarita Halwai D/b Shri Laxmichand Halwai aged about 3O years, Shiksha Karmi Grade— 3 Boys Primary School Mmwuhl TahsH Marwahl Dustnct Brlaspm (C G ) VERSU§ PETITIONER MK RESPONDENTS E ,1. State- bf Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Mantralaya, D.K.S. Raipur (C.G.). janpad I [Eil‘mwms Panchayat Marwahl, Through' The Chief Executive Officer Marwahl Dlstnct Bllaspur (CG) The Additional Coilector, Pendra Road, District Biiaspur (C.G.). The District 'Education Officer. Education‘District Biiaspur (C.G.). The Ziia Panchayat Biiaqpm Through The Chief Executive Officer (C.G.) Zlla Panchayat Biiaspw WRIT PETITIoN UNDER ARTICLE 2&6/227 OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WR CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS OF THE CONSTITUIION IT IN THE NATURE OF ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. . ETC. AND - FOR APPRQERIATE Arun HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR WRW PETITION NO. 5388 of 2005 Petiiioner Sarita Haiwai Versus i, Respondent - state of Chhawsgarh 8: others ' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (sB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihoui, J.) Present- Shri‘ Adityai Kumary Advocate with Shri P.P. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. > Shri M.P.S.’ Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) i i (Passed on 7‘“ Day of Aprii, 2610) 1. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this petitioner has already been granted, by the respondents and as such nothing survives for adjudication and this petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State does not controvert the above submission. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become ‘l ' .7 Sd/- saash K. Agnilwtri a Judge infructuous.