1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO. 2548 OF 2009 Shri Yakub Chandrakant Poll .. Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. J.M.Puranik, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. K.V.Saste, APP, for the Respondent. CORAM : D. B. BHOSALE, J. DATE : 03/07/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No. I-241 of 2008 of Ambarnath Police Station. The crime has been registered against the applicant and three others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under section 302 read with 34 of IPC. 3. I perused the statement of the complainant-Bhausaheb T 2 Randive. He has given detailed description as to what happened in the night when the alleged incident of murder took place in the house of the applicant. The applicant is the husband of the deceased and it appears that he was suspecting her character and on that account, with the help of other three accused, he allegedly killed her. The deceased died due to asphyxia due to strangulation. Sari, which was used for strangulation, has been recovered at the instance of the present applicant. Having considered the nature of allegations against the applicant, I am not inclined to enlarge him on bail. Hence, the application is rejected. Trial is expedited. While passing this order, I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. (D. B. Bhosale, J.) 3