In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. R.S.A.No. 82 of 2007 (O&M) Decided on January 16,2007. Smt.Bimla and another ---- Appellants vs. Smt. Sheela --- Respondent. Present: Mr.Ramesh Sharma,Advocate, for the appellants Pritam Pal,J: (Oral) This appeal by defendants/ appellants, is directed against judgments and decrees dated April 29,2003 and July 25,2006 passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division) and Addl.District Judge, Gurdaspur, respectively, whereby a suit for mandatory injunction filed by respondent/plaintiff was decreed and appeal filed by appellants/defendants, was dismissed. Both the Courts below have given a concurrent finding that the respondent/plaintiff had become owner of the house vide sale deed Ex.P-1, in the year 1999, whereas the appellants/defendants also claimed to be owners of the house on the basis of a draft sale deed Ex.D2. Both the Courts below are in unison while holding that the sale deed in favour of the respondent/plaintiff is a genuine one as the same has been got executed and registered at the instance of one Sahib Singh, an authorised officer of the Government of Punjab, whereas the sale deed Ex. D2, alleged to have been drafted, is not genuine as the same was R.S.A.No.82 of 2007 (O&M) -2- not signed by any authorized officer of the Government of Punjab. In this view of the matter, I find no perversity or any illegality in the findings arrived at by both the Courts below. Besides that, learned counsel for the appellants has also not been able to make out any substantial question of law for consideration in this appeal. Hence, this Regular Second Appeal is hereby dismissed in limine. January 16,2007 (Pritam Pal) RR Judge