(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 2123 OF 2011 Shrikant s/o. Vitthal Patil, Age : 55 years, Occupation : Agriculture, .. Petitioner R/o. Jamner Datt Chaitnya Nagar, (Original defendant Jamner, Dist. : Jalgaon. no.1) versus Hemantkumar s/o. Vitthal Patil, .. Respondents Age : 32 years, (No.1 - Original Occupation : Agriculture, plaintiff & R/o. Jamner Datt Chaitnya Nagar, No.2 - Original Jamner, Dist. : Jalgaon, defendant no.2) and another. ....................... Mr. S.P. Tiwari, Advocate, holding for Mr. N.L. Choudhari, Advocate, for the petitioner. ........................ CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 2ND MAY 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. Heard Adv. Mr. S.P. Tiwari, holding for Adv. Mr. N.L. Choudhari, for the petitioner. (2) 2. Adv. Mr. S.P. Tiwari seeks adjournment. However, already this court has given adjournments on four occasions. Hence, request for adjournment is rejected. 3. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 20-12-2010, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jamner, below Exhibit 16 in Regular Civil Suit No. 99/2009. 4. The trial court has rejected the application under Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC, after noticing that there was no exceptional case or ground made out. 5. I have perused the impugned order. The relevant aspects are looked into and consideration by trial court does not show any jurisdictional error. 6. In the result, the petition is dismissed. No costs. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp2123