IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42403 of 2008 Urmila Versus State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3 1.8.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is alleged for taking away answer sheet (copy) handing over question paper. Defence is that it was mistake only as it was for invigilator to see that answer sheet is not handed over rather question paper is handed over to him and further in no way it was to favour this petitioner nor she was to be benefited any way rather at once punished for the same as result went against her that was further followed by debarring her for next year examination. The defence placed by petitioner needs evidence (corroboration), areas are different on the point of result of an act and criminal courts are concerned with crime if committed and at the stage of framing of charge taking away of copy (movable property) with dishonest intention has rightly been concluded. Thus, I find no error in the order dated 5.7.2008 passed by learned Magistrate in G.R. Case no. 2518 of 2005 on the petition 2 under section 239 Cr.P.C. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)