1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR W.P.NO.5602 of 2009 The Exe.Eng. And anr. ..vs.. Ganshyam K.Dahare Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JUNE 16, 2010. Heard Mr.Sonare, learned AGP for the petitioners and Mr.S.V.Bhutada, learned counsel for the respondent. Learned AGP Sonare contends that the Labour Court has found that the respondent was working under Employment Guarantee Scheme (EGS) and as Mustering Assistant, the respondent was not a workman and Labour Court has no jurisdiction to grant any relief, as E.G.S. activity is not an industry. According to him, the impugned judgment is without jurisdiction. Advocate Bhutada argues that the impugned judgment is delivered on 12/12/2007 and it has been maintained by the Industrial Court in revision on 3/7/2008. The writ petition has been filed challenging these concurrent orders on 20th of November, 2009. He further argues that in any case the Labour Court has only directed the Government to follow the Circular and has not granted relief of reinstatement and back wages to the respondent. I perused the papers. Labour court has only 2 directed the Government to abide by Circular dated 3/2/2007. It has not given any positive relief to the respondent. In this view of the matter, no prejudice is caused to the petitioner. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. No costs. JUDGE chute