: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4159 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent a/w WRIT PETITION NO.4156 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent a/w WRIT PETITION NO.4148 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent a/w WRIT PETITION NO.4154 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent a/w WRIT PETITION NO.4139 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent : 2 : a/w WRIT PETITION NO.4143 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent a/w WRIT PETITION NO.4158 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent a/w WRIT PETITION NO.4144 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent a/w WRIT PETITION NO.4152 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent a/w WRIT PETITION NO.4149 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent AND : 3 : WRIT PETITION NO.4142 OF 1992 Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation ... Petitioner V/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ltd. ... Respondent Mr.P.K. Dhakephalkar i/b S.R. Ganbavale for Petitioner Mr.Milind Sathe a/w S.M. Gorwadkar and Mr.H.N. Vakil for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 11th AUGUST, 2009 P.C.: 1. These writ petitions challenge the ratabale value assessed by the Municipal Corporation in respect of the respondent’s premises. The facts in the present cases are similar to the facts in Writ Petition No.4136 of 1992. For the reasons stated in the decision in Writ Petition No.4136 of 1992, delivered today, these writ petitions are also allowed. 2. Rule made absolute accordingly. No costs.