1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2602/2009 Usha R.Pardeshi & Ors. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents Mr.Rajendra Sorankar for petitioner Ms.Kejriwal,APP for State Mr.N.V.Sawant,for Res.3 CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI, & SMT.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE : 27th JANUARY, 2010 . P.C. . The petitioners seek quashing of F.I.R.no. 123/2009 registered at Navghar Police Station , Mulund. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length. We have perused the F.I.R.. In the F.I.R. ,the complainant has interalia given the details of illtreatment meted out to her by the petitioners. According to the complainant , the second petitioner married her on 25/10/2007. Thereafter he has not come to India. According to the petitioner the second petitioner has married some woman in U.S.A. . The complainant’s case is that the second petitioner married her for money. Offences under section 498-A ,406 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code are alleged against the petitioners. 2 2] Having perused the F.I.R. it is not possible for us to come to the conclusion that this case falls in any of the categories laid down by the Supreme Court in State of Haryana & Ors.Vs.Ch.Bhajan Lal & Others,AIR 1992,SC,604 . Besides,the chargesheet is also filed. Hence the complaint cannot be quashed. 3] Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed several complaints with the Commissioner of Police, New Bombay about the alleged harassment by the concerned police officers. He says that the Commissioner of New Bombay has not looked into the complaints. 4] We expect the Commissioner of Police, New Bombay to look into the complaints filed by the petitioners in accordance with law. The petition is dismissed. (Smt.Ranjana Desai,J.) (Smt.Mridula Bhatkar,J.) 3