IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 12183 of 2008 Between: 1 P. Narasimha Reddy S/o Malla Reddy 2 P. Baghavan Reddy S/o Malla Reddy (Both the petitioners R/o Korapalli, Village, Jammikunta Mandal, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Jammikunta Mandal, Karimnagar District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karimnagar, karimnagar District. 3 Village Assistant, Korapalli Village, Jammikunta Mandal, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one inthe nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not incorporating the petitioners' names in the Revenue Records as per Section 5 of A.P. rights in Pattadar Pass Book 1971 is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently directthe respondents to incorporate the petitioenrs' names in the Revenue Records by duly following the process as contemplated under Section5 of A.P. Rights in Pattadar Pass book 1971 and pass such further other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.G.RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 12183 of 2008 Order: The petitioners claim to have assigned the lands in question by the then Tahsildar, Huzurabad in the year 1966, and since then they have been in possession and enjoyment of the same. It is their case that till 1996 their names were reflected in the revenue records, and when their names are not being shown in the revenue records since 1996, they made several representations, the latest of which is dated 04.09.2007, requesting the respondents to incorporate their names in the revenue records, but till date no action thereon had been taken. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: The respondents are directed to consider and dispose of the application dated 04.09.2007, said to have been made by the petitioners for correction of entries in the revenue records, and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 13.06.2008 Nsr