1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6290 OF 2009 Waman s/o Eknath Parekar Age 51 years, Occu.Service as Clerk in Nanded Waghala Municipal Corporation, R/o Nanded, Taluka and District Nanded .. PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The Nanded Waghala Municipal Corporation, through its Commissioner 2. The Divisional Commissioner on behalf of the B.C.Cell Department, in Commissioner’s Office at Aurangabad 3. The Director of Municipal Administration, Maharashtra State, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032 .. RESPONDENTS Shri P.V.Mandlik, Senior Advocate holding for Shri Amol Gandhi, Advocate for petitioner Shri M.V.Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.1 Shri V.B.Ghatge, Assistant Govt.Pleader for respondents 2 & 3 CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ DATE : 30th September 2009 ORAL JUDGMENT [ PER P.V.HARDAS , J ] 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2 2. Though by this petition, the petitioner has prayed for various reliefs, Shri P.V.Mandlik, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner states on instructions that the petitioner restricts the scope of this petition insofar as relief by directing respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 22.8.2009 and reserves the liberty of filing appropriate proceedings in respect of the other reliefs in the event the representation is decided adverse to the interest of the petitioner. We accordingly permit the petitioner to withdraw this petition in respect of the other reliefs and grant the liberty as prayed for. 3. We have heard Shri P.V.Mandlik, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, Shri M.V.Deshpande, learned Counsel on behalf of respondent No.1 and learned Assistant Government Pleader Shri Ghatge for respondents 2 and 3. 4. Since the representation of the petitioner is pending, we are inclined to allow this petition by directing the respondents to decide the said representation. Accordingly, we allow this petition and direct the respondents to decide the represenation of the petitioner dated 22.8.2009 annexed to the petition as Exhibit- A within four months from today and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. 3 5. Rule is thus made absolute on the above terms with no orders as to costs. ( A.V.POTDAR ) ( P.V.HARDAS ) JUDGE JUDGE vvr/6290.09wp 4