1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 81 OF 2010 IN ‘TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 749 OF 2006 Prakash Gopal Paranjape. ..Petitioner. Mr. R.V.Govilkar for the petitioner. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 30.7.2010. PC : 1 This is a chamber summons taken out by the original petitioner for restoration of the petition. It is seen that since the office objections were not removed, the petition came to be dismissed. Subsequently, Judge’s order was taken out and the same came to be allowed on 8.5.2009. The Judge’s order mentions that office objection should be removed within 8-weeks failing which petition was to stand disposed off automatically. It is the case of the petitioner that office objection could not be removed because intimation of delivery was received on 5.10.2009 and 15.10.2009 and these intimations were received by the Advocate for the petitioner in pursuance of the complaint made. Thereafter, this chamber summons has been taken out on 26.3.2010. That, there after Judge’s order No.60/2010 was taken but that was disposed off with liberty to take out substantive application. The present chamber summons is therefore filed. Taking into 2 consideration the aforesaid facts, in the interest of justice, chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to payment of costs of Rs.2000/- which will be paid to the Legal Aid Committee, High Court Bombay within a period of 3- weeks from today. Chamber summons is disposed off. (R.S. MOHITE,J.)