Wmhx}<?wg‘\g‘%,\ ......W ‘ 2003 e Shri Dhirendra Mishra. J. Singie Bench: Hon’b 3-2-2009:- Shri Arun Shukla, counsei for the petitioner. r for the State/respondents No.1 and 2. Smt. Meera Jaiswai, couneei or respondent No.3. Shri MK. Sinha, counsel for spondent No.4. Hea rd. This petition is directed ag inst the order of Annexure-Pl’i. dated 7‘“ January, 2003 whereby appointme tof the petitioner as contract teacher vide ordervof Annexure-PB dated 7-1 1—2 02 has been canceiied’i Miss Sunita Jain, Panei La mm (gigagu) WWW , mm mafsam WW1¥wm awfmm PE?§T§GNER: Smt. $umati Devi, Wife of Ramesh aged about 27 yeafs, Resident of Chhitbishrampur; Tehsii Balrampur, District Sarguja (GG) RESPONDENTS: The State of Chhatiisgarh, through $ecretary, Depaitment Panchayat and Rural Development, Mantraiay, D.K.S. Bui§ding, Raipur. 2. The Sub Divisionai Officer (Revenue) Prescribed Authority, -Ramanu§ganj, District Sarguja (CG) Ku. Maiti Khes, Dlo Junas Kheé, resident of Vinage Chhitv§shramnpur, Bairampur, Sarguja (CG) The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat! Chhitvishrampur, Wm m zoo mm (my) WWW “if Fmm pemsai of the ordei' ebserved that the appointment v therefore, the instant petition for become infructuous with the iapsl‘ having become infructuous. Consequentiy, a“ the pendin‘ @ W31 mmm ammm WW WWR %aifirqm of appointment of Annexure-PI3, it iS Ias for academic session 2032—03 and; the {eliefs ciaimed by the pet§tioner has 2 of time. it is accordingiy dismissed as i g ahpiicatiohs aiso etand dispose/doV/i/ / // / ea ww"sew v \ j@ i