IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40963 of 2011 Md. Imran Alam @ Md. Emran Alam son of Md. Taiyab Alam Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 07.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case registered for offence under Sections 498-A, 307 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. It is stated that initially the complaint petition was filed in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj on 05.04.2010 which was referred to the Police for institution of First Information Report and investigation. According to the complaint, the informant was driven out of her matrimonial home on 01.04.2010 but the complaint in question was filed on 05.04.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that admittedly the complainant was married to the petitioner more than four years ago. There is no truth behind the allegation of subjecting the complainant for non- fulfillment of demand of dowry. The present case has been instituted mainly due to incompatibility in nature of 2 the parties. Be that as it may, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt / communication of the order be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj, in connection with Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 41 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the code of Criminal Procedure. Saif/- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)