IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No.1437 of 2006 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.07.2009 Shree Satnam Dharam Education Society (registered) Panipat and another .......Petitioners Versus Vijay Aggarwal and others ......Respondents Present: Mr. Arun Palli, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sunil Garg, Advocate and Mr. Divanshu Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. In view of the disposal of the civil revisions, in the manner agreed to between the parties, there is no necessity to take up and pass any orders in the contempt petition. 2. Dismissed as having become infructuous. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE July 07, 2009 Pankaj*