IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23905 of 2010 MUNNA MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----- 06. 23.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Informant’s brother came to Sitamarhi to purchase a tractor stayed in night, but was killed, his dead body recovered in the morning. Allegation is about coming to purchase a Nokia mobile in evening, deceased along with this petitioner disappeared and thereafter only deceased was killed. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no eye witness of the case and statement of Uday Sharma is only there that deceased was last seen with this petitioner while suspicion is there on Uday Sharma, Santosh Jha and Shambhu Jha that they were accompanying the deceased from his village, might have killed for the money kept with the deceased. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No.484 of 2009, G.R. No.2107 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.) 2