1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.863 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2984 OF 2010 The Thane Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. .. Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2978 OF 2008 Abhyudaya Co-op.Bank Ltd. .. Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10332 OF 2010 AND CIVIL APPLICTION NO.365 OF 2011 IN W.P.NO.10332 OF 2010 The Saraswat Co-op.Bank Ltd. .. Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Bharat Vaishnawa i/by M/s.Bharat Vaishnawa & Co.for the applicant in C.A.No.863 of 2011. Mr.Bhupesh Samant for the petitioner in W.P.Nos.2984 of 2010 & 10332 of 2010. Mr.V.C.Ghosalkar for petitioner in W.P.No.2978 of 2008 and for Respondent No.5 in C.A.No.863 of 2011. Mr.N.R.Prajapati for Respondent No.3 -Union of India in W.P.No.2978 of 2008. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. 2 DATE: 18th November, 2011. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By the Civil Application No.863 of 2011, it is prayed that the order dated 15.02.2011 may be recalled so as to restore the order dated 25.01.2011. The only ground pressed into service is that the order dated 15.02.2011 was passed without hearing the applicant/original Respondent No.4 in the writ petition. 2. Even if we were to accept the explanation given by the applicant in the application, as good justification for remaining absent on 15.02.2011, it may not be possible for us to now turn reverse the situation and restore the order dated 25.01.2011. That is because, consequent to order dated 15.02.2011, which in turn explains and clarifies the order dated 25.01.2011, the State Government has already formulated the policy and has notified the same vide Notification dated 10.03.2011. Further, the order dated 15.02.2011 is only in the nature of clarification of the order dated 25.01.2011. 3. Considering the fact that the applicant has not chosen to challenge the notification which is essentially founded on the directions 3 contained in the order dated 25.01.2011, we fail to understand as to how the relief claimed in the matter can take the applicant any further. If the applicant has any grievance regarding the validity or correctness of the above notification, he is free to pursue that remedy as per law. 4. Hence, Civil Application No.863 of 2011 is disposed of. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)