~T HC-22 '3^ -!4Wlcl<4, ©Tilwie.fqwi'tf^ irapn aiiith SW^ "qg^? .-^©A,.^^ Iq^^T" SII^TW K-»*s^v aifw 311^1 TOIRR^lfTO PETITiONER: RESPQN_DENTS Son Exei Disti -V Stat Ssa iVlini Exei Distl (Writ Petition under Article Sinaie Bench : Hon'bi Karti(< NarayanSoni, S/o Shri Panna Lal Age about 51 years, Office of lutive Engineer, P.W.D. Mahasamund, jct Mahasamund (CG) (rsus- Govt. 1-12. Shri Somkant Verma, counsel Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocat) Heard. This is the 2 round No.3921/2008 was disposed ofwith| to decide representation of the p|i thereafter representation of the pe1| Annexure-P/1 dated 20-10-2008 wl1i the petitioner has been rejected. Learned counsei for the petj been transferred from Mahasamur^i policy of the State and this aspje concerned authorities while decidini ^l^<rt<ft*l 'RPI^f tf 'fe^t <F>1^1< i?3?P<TO 311^1 of Chhattisgarh, under Pubiic Work Department try, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) rtar/ utive Engineer, P.W.D. Mahasamund, Mahasamund (CG) 26 of the Constitution of India) Shri Dhirendra Mishra, J. for thepetitioner. fe for the State/respondents. !itigation. Eariier Writ Petjtion(S) a direction tothe concerned authorities etitioner within a period of 2 weeks, itioner has been decided vide order of sreby representation against transfer of ioner submitted that the petitioner has to Balod in contravention of transfer ict has not been considered by the representation. ti.^sr!Ss, i iVKSSt's°s% S ./ /XI-H.C-22 !^.J "••^f^/ ""•enesa8'3'' 'S^I •^WIcf'i), SfllwiG. («(<11'My 3TI^?T 'W3K *<I*<CTI ai*ii(»> —•-—--—--^ ^gg fN^g' sn^r^r I<;1 dfl^l sta*iicit ^lfsa Barve sn^iWtiiwnfsg ^ (:bt<:fF<n<Hn *imv^ ^fs^ '^R?TC i; 3iPa*T aii^r After hearing counsel for |:he petitioner and after perusing the impugned order of Annexure-P/)! whereby representation has been rejected, it is:observed that the sarfie has been rejected after application of mind by assigning reasons. So far |as submission of !earned counse! for the petitioner that the transfer order fs in violation of the transfer policy is concerned, the transfer policy ofttle State Government does not have any sfatutory force and it is only guidelii In viewof the aboye, the pet hes for efFecting transfers; tion is dismissed. ^f^ ^syi { [^^g?r