HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W. P. No. 12341 of 2009 Monday the 3rd day of August, 2009 Between: G.Ravinder Reddy .. Petitioner And The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Rep. By its Deputy Commissioner, Hyd. and two others .. Respondents O R D E R:- The main grievance of the petitioner is that even though he made a representation dated 17.06.2009 requesting the 1st and 2nd respondents to take action against the 3rd respondent, who, without leaving any set backs, is making construction of the building, in gross violation of the Hyderabad Revised Building Rules, 2006, but they have neither passed any orders on his representation nor initiated any action against the 3rd respondent. Hence, the present writ petition is filed seeking appropriate directions. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material placed on record. On 25.06.2009, when the matter was taken up for admission, the learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 sought time to get instructions. Today, when the matter is called, he reported no instructions. Hence, this Court, without keeping the matter pending, feels it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the following directions: “Respondent No.1-Corporation and respondent No.2 – Zonal Commissioner are directed to consider the representation dated 17.06.2009 said to have been filed by the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders thereon, in accordance with law, expeditiously, after issuing notice to the 3rd respondent, and initiate action in accordance with the decision to be taken. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 3rd August, 2009 Note: Furnish copy in one week B/o bcj