IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14878 of 2010 1. KAMESHWAR CHAUDHARY 2. Angad Chaudhary 3. Awadhesh Chaudhary Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2/ 13.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that allegation levelled against the petitioners is false and the outcome of pressurizing tactics. Petitioner no.1’s father was murdered. Informant and his main witness are accused and petitioners no. 2 and 3 are witnesses of that case. After the investigation, final form was submitted even ignoring the material collected against prosecution, cognizance is taken and petitioners are apprehending their arrest which never can be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Kuchhila P.S. Case No. 17 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bhabua (Kaimur) subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)