IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2915 of 2009 SARJUG PRASAD SINGH, son of Late Ramdhani Singh, resident of Village Asarhi, P.S. Hilsa, Distt. Nalanda. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Block Development Officer, Dulhin Bazar, P.S. Dulhin Bazar, Distt. Patna. 3. Deputy Development Commissioner, Patna. 4. District Magistrate, Patna. 5. District General Provident Fund Officer, Patna. 6. Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 7. Finance Commissioner, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- 9. 18.3.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of January, 2002 as Village Level Worker (V.L.W.) from the Community Development Block, Dulhin Bazar, Patna, although some of the pensionary dues have been settled and paid, but still the arrears of pension on account of revision as also the leave salary on the revised pay scale and the arrears on account of his promotion have yet to be settled. Separate counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent-State as also the Accountant General. It is submitted that on perusal of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Accountant General, it would appear that although the order for revision of pension/family pension has been issued as per the authorization contained in No. Pen- 01/PEN050210010118/352544P1 dated 9th February, 2010, as 2 contained in Annexure A to the said counter affidavit, but the arrears of pension have not been indicated therein. The learned counsel appearing for the Accountant General submits that the arrears of pension shall be paid either by the Bank or the Treasury, for which the petitioner may approach the said authority as per the rate indicated in the said authorization (Annexure A). Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that for redressal of his aforesaid grievances, the petitioner proposes to place all his grievances by way of representation before the District Magistrate, Patna (respondent no.4). In case such a representation is filed stating the aforesaid three grievances distinctly as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the aforesaid grievances, including with regard to the lesser amount of leave salary, shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. Upon consideration if the representation of the petitioner finds favour, further necessary orders shall be issued simultaneously so that the petitioner may be paid the admitted dues with statutory interest, if any, without delay. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that so far as letter no.Pen-1-1540 dated 16th of February, 2010 as contained in Annexure B/1 to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Accountant General is concerned, the petitioner proposes to assail the 3 same in accordance with law as the same is not correct. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)