/ (L^-~ \^S) ?IM?!li S BESSi'-U! IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR (C.6.) W.P. (S) NoA^ /2011 ^ PETITIONER \^^- -". w*l'</' y'" ^··''^·y'^>-·"- ^.T* Naveen Kumar Lenjhare, S/o Late Shri Gayalal Lenjhare, aged about 31 years, R/o Ward No. 16, Bakhtawarchal, Tulsipur, Rajnand- gaon, Distt.- Rajnandgaon (C.6.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS ^ i. State of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary &epartment of Cooperative Society, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (.C.&.) .€' 2. Sub Re9istrar, Cooperative Society, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTECLES 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA ^e'ai^\ S S!-.-i-S'a!-. Ei 1M j Petltioner VERSUS Naveen Kumar Lenlhare State of Chhattlsaarh ancj another "jaeArs?" Shri A.K. Pati!, counse! for the peEitioner. ann AV. Sndhar, PL tor the State. (02.Q8.2011) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the purpose of filing thls petition would be se.rved if a direction is issued to the respondent No.2 to decide the pending case of the petit'oner relating to his appointment on compassionate ground. He further submits th.at the father of the petitioner namely Late Shri Gayalal Lenjhare was working as Cooperative Inspector posted at Durg, who died on 14.05.2005 while in sep/ice. According to the petitioner, his application seekjng compassionate appointment is pending before respondent No.2 which was fi!ed on 18.07.2005. 2. Learned counsel for the State has no objection if the pending application of the petitioner is decided by the competent authoritv in accordance with law, if not declded alreadv. the ;ided 3. The petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the pending application of petitioner for CQmpassjonate appointment if not atready in accordance with law. 4. it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned wouid be at liberty to decide the same strict!'/ in accordance wlth !aw. Sd/- : Pritinker Diwaker ^ Judge