IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2010 / 12TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 16998 of 2010(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. USHA RAJAN, AGED 55, W/O. LATE RAJAN, PUNARHAN HOUSE, HOSPITAL ROAD, TRIPUNITHURA. 2. NISHA RAJAN, AGED 29, D/O. LATE RAJAN, PUNARHAN HOUSE, HOSPITAL ROAD, TRIPUNITHURA. 3. NIKESH RAJAN, AGED 25, D/O LATE RAJAN, PUNARHAN HOUSE, HOSPITAL ROAD, TRIPUNITHURA. 4. NIMISHA RAJAN, AGED 21, D/O LATE RAJAN, PUNARHAN HOUSE, HOSPITAL ROAD, TRIPUNITHURA. BY ADV. SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICER, KANAYANNUR. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MARADU. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.16998 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners claim to be owners in possession of 11.467 cents of land in Sy.No.1150/1 and 2 of Nadama Village. In respect of the same, there was a suit as O.S.No.1455/1996 before the Additional Munsiff's Court, Ernakulam. The petitioners claim that the said suit has been decreed in favour of the petitioners and the same has become final. The petitioners filed Ext.P7 application before the 3rd respondent for mutation of the property in their name. The petitioners seek a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P7 and pass orders thereon expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P7, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners. It would be open to the 3rd respondent to hear other persons also, if he is of opinion that any other persons require to be heard. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2