IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33943 of 2008 RAJESH KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 5.9.2008 Heard. The case is under Sections 392 and 411 of the IPC and relates to snatching of the motorcycle of the informant at gun point by some criminals. The petitioner is not named in it nor he has been put on test identification parade but the fact of the matter is that the theft property, i.e., the motorcycle was recovered from the house of the petitioner as a result of the confession of a co- accused pointing the place and its being kept. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the informant and the present petitioner are the businessmen and there was some rivalry between the two and that could be the reason that in spite of finding a motorcycle on the road, the police created the document showing the same was recovered from the house of the petitioner. The court was anxious to know whether the petitioner captured the motorcycle towards the realization of his amount but the learned counsel was fairly denying it and placed his defence as indicated above, but was again fair in submitting that the document showing the recovery does indicate that it was from the house of the petitioner. The learned counsel has not been able in pointing out the reason to this court as to why the police could be acting so far as to creating a false and fictitious document. Petition is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )