IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR / 2009 w< M.C.C. No. 4'fi Q/ TCT- ARISING OUT FROM ORDER DATED 14 5/2009 PASSED BY HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI PRITINKAR DIWAKAR IN W.P fSI NO^S6S992005 APPLICANTS fPetitioners in W.P.fSI No. 1059/20051 y Panna Lal Sahu S/o Amrit Lal Sahu, aged about 47 years. t^^ :£S-V'' ^2, <,Avi ....^}s^: ....-•^ I-^JK ^S^S^^ ^v A." ^^ ^ 6. 7.- 8. •^ <9- 10, Hori Lal Sharma S/o Komal Prasad Sharma, aged about 48 years. Anil Kumar Sahu s/o Parau Ram Sahu, aged about 40 years. Bheekham LaL Ratre S/o shri Jhadoo Ram Ratre, aged about 46 years. Sonau Ram Sahu S^o Manbodhi Ram Sahu, aged about 53 years. Atama Ram Gaikwad S/o Mehtar Ram, aged about 42 years. Pokhan Lal Sahu S/o Shri Vishnu Ram Sahu, aged about 45 years. Manrakhan Lal Sahu S/o Shri Lallu Ram Sahu, aged.about 45 years. Panna Lal Soni S/o Shri Ram Lal Soni, aged about 40 years. Ramesh Kumar Sahu S/o Kanhaiya Lal Sahu, aged about 41 years. 11. 12. 13. 14, Nankushia Sahu S/o Sobnath Sahu, aged about 39 years. Sant Ram Thakur S/o Shri Ramnath Sahu, aged about 42 years. Dinesh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Gopinath Sahu, aged about 43 years. Onkar Sinha S/o Shri Dhru Kumar Sinha aged about 38 years. All residents of C/o Giteshwar Singh Yadu S/o Shri S.K. Yadu, Civil Lines, Gariyaband, District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS \^\^ ^^ '^^T^W ly State of Madhya Pradesh (Now C.G.) Through - Secretary, Department of Forests, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Chief Conservator of Forests, Department of Forest, Raipur, (C.G.) 3. Conservator of Forests, Forest Circle, Raipur (C.G.). 4. Divisional Forest Officer, F f~ South Forest Division, Raipur Circle, Raipur (C.G.) ,5. Rakesh Tiwari S/o Vidya Dhar Tiwari, aged about 28 years. 6. Maniram Markam S/o Rohit Das Markam, aged about 32 years. 7. Nand Kishor Som S/o Shri Ramji Thakur, aged about 31 years. Nos. 5 to 7 all residents of C/o Giteshwar Singh Yadu S/o Shri S.K. Yadu, Civil Lines, Gariyaband, District Raipur (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P.S No. 1095/2005 T aii^i qn R-fi'* "^I 3ll^9t^*li^n wwn atNiw '3"^ "Ml'illd^, S>Ti1'Mil<o, [»<Wiyi< __.......U..C...£.....G&....^ ,^6 5 an^T'^v (.'iy^vf) TOiiw^iftffsn^ SB : y68'BLE MR. JUSTICB Pttt 05.10.2009 Shri Sanieev Kumar Sahu, Shri Vaibhay Goverdhan, P| Heard on I.A. No. 01, whi4 ofdeiay'in fiUng the appiication. This is not opoosed by the Accordingly, I.A. 2'io. 01 is] appeal is condoned. Also heard on the awiici 1095/2005 which has been disij 14.5.2009. Counsel for the State has ni For the reasons mentione allowed. Accordingiy, M.C.C. No. 40 1095/2005 isrestored to its origir •^nRpiN•qn^ff'iifeA ^faK5R ^sJfiPTSII^i ounsel for the aDplicaRts. j. for the Sta.te. 1 is an aopucauon tor conaonation ounsei for the State. ailowed and the deiay in filing the ion for restoration of W.P.fSj No. .issed for want of orosecution on objection. in the appiication, the same is /2009 is aiiowed and W.P. (Sl No. a.1 numoer. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge mgOTSl°fCTga"iiri«tw-ii's'ii^—ra/»s —11/2008—i,oo,ooo.