IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28432 of 2008 DIMPAL OJHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11.8.2008. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. F.I.R. has been instituted under Sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code. So far petitioner is concerned stolen iron bell has not been recovered from his possession. It is alleged that Sunil Kumar who was found in possession of the iron bell has disclosed the name of petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the iron bell was not stolen and the entire prosecution case is false. Sunil Kumar has disclosed the petitioner’s name but there was no recovery from the possession of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid fact prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. The petitioner namelyDimpal Ojha is directed to surrender before the C.J.M Bhojpur Arra within four weeks from today and on his so surrendering he shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M.Bhojpur Arra in connection with Jagdishpur P.S.Case no 243 of 2006 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)