IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.635 of 2010 Date of decision: 7th July, 2010 Mohd. Nazir … Petitioner Versus Mohd. Saleem and others … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Rajeev Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Jain, Advocate for the respondents. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) On 15th October, 2008, vide order (Annexure P-2), issues were re-casted and counsel for the plaintiff made a statement that he will lead no evidence in affirmative on the re-casted issues and the evidence already led be taken into consideration. Similarly, counsel for the defendant also made a statement that he will also not lead any other evidence on the re-casted issues and the evidence already led be read by the Court. The order (Annexure P-2) was passed on 15th October, 2008. Six months thereafter, an application was filed without withdrawing the statement recorded in order (Annexure P-2) praying that permission may be granted to the petitioner-defendant to examine the handwriting expert to impeach the testimony of the handwriting expert examined by the plaintiff before the issues were re-casted and statements were made by counsel for the parties. Civil Revision No.635 of 2010 Once, taking the entire gamut of case into consideration, counsel for the defendant had made a statement and slept over the same for a period of six months, it is too late in the day to say that the defendant may be permitted to examine the handwriting expert. No infirmity is discernible from the impugned order (Annexure P-1). Hence, no interference is warranted in the present revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE July 7, 2010 rps 2