I IN ThE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS ThE 7th DAY OF MARCH, 2011 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V. JAGANNATHAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6065/2010 BETWEEN: Uppala Doddi Hulugappa Sb. Sunakkappa Aged 26 years, 0cc: Teacher R/o. Tekkalakote, Siraguppa Taluk Bellary District. PETITIONER (By Sri. 0. M. Bhat, Adv. for Phaniraj Kashyap, Adv.) AND: The State of Karnataka by Tekkatakote Police represented by The State Public Prosecutor Bangalore. ... RESPONDENT (By Sri. Anand K. Navalgimath, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 438 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN ThE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CR.NO.79/10 OF THEKKALAKOTE P.S., BELLARY DIST., WHICHIS REOD., FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 323, 504, 302 R/W 34 OF IPC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Heard both sides in respect of anticipatory bail sought by the petitioner, who is accused No.1 in the case which is registered in Crime No.79/2010 in respect of the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 307, 323, 504, 302 R/w Section 34 of IPC. 2. Having regard to the nature of prosecution’s allegation, this petitioner is said to have kicked on the deceased and also kicked on the stomach of the deceased and the post-mortem report indicating that death was due to injuries on abdomen and spleen, in my view it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. Though submission made is that other accused have been granted bail by the trial Court, this petitioner, therefore can move the trial Court for regular bail. 3. For the above reasons, anticipatory bail petition is rejected. If the petitioner seeks regular bail, the trial court may consider his application at the earliest. Sd/ JUDGE gab/