ash 1 cp-255.11 . FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.255 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri A.A. Gatne i/by Shri Sugandh Deshmukh for the Petitioner. Shri G.S. Hegde i/by M/s.G.S. Hegde & Associates for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 21ST DECEMBER, 2011 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the first Respondent. Affidavit of one Phand Kamlakar Bhagwan, an officer of the first Respondent is taken on record which shows that in terms of the order of the Division Bench, the order dated 22nd July, 2011 has been passed by the first Respondent. There is a gross delay in passing the order. It appears that the order has been passed after filing of the Contempt Petition. 2. Though belatedly, there has been a compliance ash 2 cp-255.11 with the order of this Court. In any case, in view of the assertions in the affidavit, it cannot be said that there is any wilful default on the part of the Contemnors. 3. Now the remedy of the Petitioner is to challenge the order dated 22nd July, 2011 if he is aggrieved by the same. It is obvious that while disposing of this Contempt Petition, the issue regarding illegality of the said order is not decided and the said issue is always open to be agitated in the appropriate proceedings. 4. Subject to what is observed above, the Petition is disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J)