1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 1687 OF 2010 Jitendra Surendra Sharma .. APPLICANT. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra .. RESPONDENT ... Shri A.D. Kasliwal, Advocate for applicant. Shri D.V. Tele, Addl. Public Prosecutor, for respondent. CORAM :- S.V. GANGAPURWALA VACATION JUDGE. DATE : 26th MAY, 2010. PER COURT: Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent. The complaint is lodged against the applicant Under Section 407,420 r.w. 34 of Indian Penal Code on the ground that the applicant is owner of the vehicle in which goods were loaded and thereafter, goods were missing from the said truck. 2. No actual acts are attributed to the present applicant except that he is the owner of 2 the vehicle concern, and the said acts can be attributed to the Driver. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor states that the said driver is absconding. 3. The custodial interrogation of the present applicant would not be necessary. 4. In the light of above, in the event of arrest of the applicant, he be released on bail in connection with Crime No. 18/10 registered with MIDC Ahmednagar Police Station, Dist. Ahmednagar Under Section 407,420 r.w. 34 of Indian Penal Code, on executing Personal Bond of Rs. 25,000/- and one surety of like amount. The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation, shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence, and he shall report the concern Police Station as and when summoned by the Police. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] VACATION JUDGE SDM* 1687.10Cri.