LE H COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH ‘ AT BILAsPUR (c G ) ‘3! ( w.P... ‘(QNog 233} .[2009 / Baikunth Bihari Pradhan S/o. Ishwa‘r Pradhan, aged about- 40 years; ‘ Director, Block Pithroa,“ Districtf Central Co-operative Bank, Raipur", R/o. Vill§ge Jadamuda, Post- Arangi5, Police S;tation’- Basna, Tahsil & District-£Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS PIITION ET ER l ‘ 1./State. of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Co; operative Socuetles, D K S Bhawan Raipur (C G ) ‘ _ Z.’ The Registrar, Co-operative Societies Raipur (C G ) / 3. The Deputy Registrar Co operatlv Soc1etles Raipur (C G ) The Chief Executive Officer, Jlla H . Sahakarl Kendrlya Bank Maryadit Raipur (C G) _ 5 ,. Yogesh Chandrakar, President Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryaditi Raipur(CG) Budharu Ram Sahu, Bank » Representative, Vrih Krishi Shakha Sahakari Samiti Maryadit— Kodebod Branch- Maraud, Distt- Dhamtari. , RS ESPONDENT ’— 7‘.” Prabhat Rao, Director ’Jiia Sahakari Kendriya Bank \ Maryadit, Raipur (C.G.) Triiochan Patel Director j‘ila r 8. Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Raipur(CG) i Praveen Chandrakar Directo Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Marya , Raipur (C G ) l ! { I ‘ ! 1 BEFORE THE HON'B HIG 5 / r it ‘ r WRI'T.P'ETITI0N u‘NDER‘ARTI-clE 226¥0F THE , 'CbNs’“1"I‘1'U“T'IO'N OF INDIA ‘1 ep 2 06 2009 (Annexure P/2) whereby, on the ‘aSIS of r (96 2009 wherem 1t has been pnma facze observedithat the petmo 4 10 ner v _ uh aj appens to be the brother ofH etttloner took place on 11 04 2008 Even otherwt oubtful asto whether electlon can be quash d or set asi d de ethod The nottce dated 02062009 and 12 06 2009 are netth m er» umtlve nor prejudlcral to the mterest of the: etmoner It 1s su ' 'p n ‘ uectlon to the petrtloner to appear 1n pers and file response to t d he I, 1 lamt and the enquiry report ofthe directors i , ‘ i ‘ T as ~ he petmoner has approached thrs Court on 17 06 2009 Thematter w ' ' ‘p s . p I O sel n perusal of the report and the submlssm made by learned coun for the pames 1t 1s ev1dent that the notxce 1s neither an order nor 1t rt ou. Shn LPra'dhan, learned counsel for the etitioner submlts that the 1mpugned nouce 1s an outcome of an enquuy wh1ch has been conducted ex arte m absence ofthe petitioner t y r forward Ins case the petltloner would notlbe prejudice enquny rep01t The petltmnet 1s at 11be1ty to quesnon the vahdz l egahty ofthe report as well as the complamt made by the person on t bas1s of whlch the enquuy was conducted.QAt thls stage 1t does not ‘ ppear to be proper to mterfere w1th the show cause notice. However, iberty 1s reserved to the petrtroner to file proper response to the netr l c mse all hrs glevances and as dlrected, may appear before the Chle r f xecutrve Officer D1stnct Cooperatlve Central Bank Ralpur on‘the pproprlate date The Clnef Executrve Olfrcer shall consrder the ease of the petltroner as put forward by him before passmg an order. rth the aforesar observatron and directlon, the wnt petrtren 1s :W d , _ d1sposed of '- " “ V tlshK Agmhot zw o , i ‘ Be that as 11 may, smce no act10n has been aken on the basis of enqun eport and the Impug1ed notxce has been Sd/- I. c d ty l he a E a i a rl j :;_