HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1344 of 2011 Order: The petitioner is defendant No.4 in the suit in O.S. No. 7 of 2003. This revision petition is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 24.1.2011 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubabad in the said suit. The 1st respondent is the plaintiff and she filed the suit for injunction simpicitor. It is stated that during the pendency of the said suit, a compromise memo was filed on behalf of plaintiffs and defendants 1 to 3 and the Court below while recording the said compromise, adjourned the matter for filing the written statement of other defendants. It is the grievance of the petitioner that as he is claiming purchase from defendant No.2, the Court below ought not to have recorded the compromise. In this case, it is to be noticed that the petitioner also filed another suit in O.S. No. 888 of 2010 before the learned Senior Civil Judge, Thorrur for specific performance with regard to the suit schedule property. In any event, O.S. No. 7 of 2003 is filed for injunction simplicitor and if any compromise memo is filed by plaintiffs and defendants 1 to 3 in the said suit, it will not bind the petitioner herein, who is defendant No.4. In that view of the matter, I do not find any illegality in the impugned order warranting interference of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The revision petition is devoid of merits and it is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY,J Date: 29th October, 2011 pnb