IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18866 of 2011 1. Arun Kumar Chaudhary, S/O Late Suraj Narayan Chaudhary 2. Ugendra Prasad Chaudhary, S/O Bishundeo Chaudhary 3. Jeevan Kumar Suman, S/O Arun Kumar Chaudhary All residents of Village-Durgapur, P.S.-Bhawanipur, District-Purnia. 4. Sachida Nand Yadav, S/O Late Vishwanath Chaudhary, resident of Village & P.S.-Bhawanipur, Distt.-Purnia. . . . . Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary Mines, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Mines Inspector cum Competent Officer, Purnia. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Purnia. 5. Dilip Kr. Thakur, S/o Karndev Thakur, village- Bishunpur, District- Purnia. . . . . . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 3/ 09.12.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make Dilip Kumar Thakur as respondent no.5. The petitioners submit that one Chandradeo Chaudhary and others executed an agreement of sale of land of village Kukrown, P.S. Dhamdaha, District Purnia, on which they are running brick kiln. Pursuant to the agreement for sale, the petitioners started brick kilns after due license from the competent authority. The petitioners submit that Chandradeo Chaudhary died and his son in violation of earlier agreement for sale, executed by his father sold his land by registered sale deed in favour of one Raju Mandal and Dilip Kumar Thakur. The petitioners submit that aforesaid Dilip Kumar Thakur gave information of purchase of land to Mines Inspector-cum- competent authority, Purnia. The petitioners on the other hand 2 filed two title suits bearing T.S. No. 28 of 2011 and T.S. No.29 of 2011. The petitioners filed a petition under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 in the aforesaid title suits and the trial court granted status quo till appearance of the defendants. The petitioners submit that in the meanwhile Mines Inspector – cum – competent authority restrained them from transacting business in brick kiln, as Dilip Kumar Thakur had filed a writ application in this Court. The petitioners submit that Dilip Ku,mar Thakur has not filed any writ application, as per the information rendered by office of the High Court. In my view, the petitioners should file representations within three weeks from today before the Mines Inspector-cum-competent authority, who after hearing Dilip Kumar Thakur and Raju Mandal would pass appropriate order in the matter within a further period of three weeks. In case, the representation is not disposed of within time specified, the operation of impugned order passed by the Mines Inspector- cum-Competent Authority would remain stayed. This application stands disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)