IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 1ST MARCH 2007 / 10TH PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 6776 of 2007(F) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. RONEY MATHEW, S/O.MATHEW, AGED 49 YEARS, THAKIDIYAL HOUSE, PALAI P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. W.P.SREEDHARAN NAIR, NADUVILAMADAM, PULIYANNOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. TOM THOMAS, NEYIKAMPARAMBIL, MARYLAND P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. PALA CO-OPERATIVE URBAN SOCIETY LTD., NO.1017, PALAI P.O., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. PALAI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN SOCIETY LTD., NO.K.1017, COMMITTEE, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. 3. THE SECRETARY, CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, (GENERAL) TRIVANDRUM. 5. JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM. BY G.P. SHRI.SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================================= W.P.(C).No.6776 of 2007 ================================== Dated this the 1st day of March, 2007 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioners in this writ petition is that respondents 1 and 2 against whom Section 65 enquiry under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act is under way, are convening an illegal meeting of the committee to enrol new members in the society. The petitioners have filed Ext.P3 representation before the 5th respondent against such move of respondents 1 and 2. The petitioners seek a direction to the 5th respondent to consider and pass appropiate orders in accordance with law on Ext.P3, as expeditiously as possible. 2. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, as disclosed in the writ petition, I direct the 5th respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 in accordance with law, w.p.c.6776/07 2 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. I also make it clear that any action taken by respondents 1 and 2 in the alleged meeting would be subject to the result of the orders to be passed by the 5th respondent on Ext.P3. The 5th respondent shall also afford an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as respondents 1 and 2 and others who may be affected by any orders to be passed on Ext.P3. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge.