IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 28.09.2010 C.R.No.6281 of 2010 (O&M) Mohinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus Manjit Kaur ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present : Mr. R.S.Sahota, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. B.R.Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral) Challenge in the present revision petition is to an order passed by the learned Executing Court on 15.06.2010, whereby objections to the execution of the decree on the ground that the same is null & void and without jurisdiction, were dismissed. The plaintiff-respondents filed a suit for recovery for damages on account of death of Mohinder Singh at the hands of the present petitioner. The said suit filed on 11.02.1992 was decreed on 06.11.2002. No appeal was filed against the judgment and decree dated 06.11.2002. However, in execution, an objection was raised that the said judgment and decree is null & void and passed without jurisdiction. Learned Executing Court has found that it cold not be pointed out that how the judgment and decree dated 06.11.2002 is null & void, premature or not executable. The only argument raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner before this Court is that the grant of interest at the rate of 12% is C.R.No.6281 of 2010 (O&M) contrary to the provisions of Section 34 of the CPC and, therefore, that part of the decree is not executable. I do not find any merit in the argument raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Once the decree has been permitted to attain finality, it is not open to the judgment-debtor to object to the grant of rate of interest in execution. The Executing Court cannot travel beyond the terms of the decree. Consequently, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the learned Executing Court, which may warrant any interference by this Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction. Dismissed. 28.09.2010 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE 2