- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.250 OF 2005 IN W.P.NO. 3683 OF 2005 Shri.Krishna Gopal Hatpale ..Appellant Vs. Eicher Demm (a Unit of Eicher Motors Ltd.) and Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Y.M.Pendse counsel for Appellant Mr.P.M.Palshikar for Respondents ... CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 29,2005 DATE : NOVEMBER 29,2005 DATE : NOVEMBER 29,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and learned counsel for Respondent. By this Appeal, the Appellant has challenged the interlocutory order granted by the learned Single Judge. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, we are not inclined to interfere with the same. However, in the larger interest of justice, we direct the Industrial Court to expeditiously dispose of the (ULP) complaint as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from today. Letters Patent Appeal accordingly - 2 - stands disposed of. 2. Issuance of certified copy is expedited. [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]