The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.25559 of 2011 Date: 13.09.2011 Between: 1.M.Vikram Kumar and another ..... Petitioners AND 1.The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) rep. through its Commissioner, B.R.K.Bhavan, Hyderabad and 2 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri S.Lakshma Reddy Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Dr.Y.Padmavathy The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed on an apprehension that despite the judgment and decree, dated 24-04-2008, in O.S.No.699 of 2007, on the file of the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, the respondents have been threatening to dismantle the room existing in stilt portion meant for parking. In support of their plea that they have secured a judgment and decree referred to above, the petitioners have filed a copy thereof. A perusal of the said judgment and decree shows that the suit was decreed granting perpetual injunction in favour of the petitioners restraining Serilingampally Municipality, which has now got merged in the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (for short ‘GHMC’), its officials and sub- ordinates, from interfering with the petitioners’ possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule room without following due process of law. In this Writ Petition, the petitioners alleged that despite the said judgment and decree, the respondents are trying to demolish the structures without taking recourse to the provisions of the GHMC Act, 1955. In my opinion, as the petitioners’ interests are already secured by way of judgment and decree, dated 24-04-2008, in O.S.No.699 of 2007, on the file of the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, if the respondents have been acting contrary thereto, the appropriate remedy for them is to initiate proceedings for execution of the said judgment and decree in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1905. In view of availability of an effective alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, without going into the merits of the case and with liberty to the petitioners to seek enforcement of the judgment and decree, dated 24-04-2008, in O.S.No.699 of 2007, on the file of the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.31492 of 2011, filed by the petitioners for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 13th September, 2011 Note: CC in three days. (B/o) LUR