IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2011 / 11TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 14745 of 2011(P) ---------------------------------------- TA. NOS.150/2009 TO 158/2009 OF KERALA SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- K.P. VARGHESE, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.K.V. PETER, MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S.WELGATE VIDEO PVT. LTD., WELGATE GARDEN, KURAVANKONAM, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.D.SAJEEV, SMT.LIGEY ANTONY. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER (COMMERCIAL TAXES), PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE KERALA SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM, 689 013 REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 3. THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (IB), COMMERCIAL TAXES, PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER MR.C.K. GOVINDAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs C.K.ABDUL REHIM,J. ------------------------------- WP(C).NO. 14745 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT Challenge in this writ petition is against Ext.P6 order issued by the 2nd respondent appellate Tribunal. It is noticed that as per the statute, a revision will be maintainable against the said order before this court. Therefore the challenge raised in this writ petition could not be entertained. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to rights of the petitioner to challenge Ext.P6 in a validly constituted tax revision case. C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE pmn/ WP(C) 2