1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 53 OF 1997 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri. B.A. Darak, Advocate for petitioners. Shri. V.D. Rakh, A.G.P. for State respondents. Shri. M.V. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.4. .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 6TH OCTOBER, 2010 1. The petitioners claim that the post of Stadium Manager shall be treated as technical post, whereas the plea of respondent No.5, according to Counsel is that, it shall be treated as non technical post. The learned Counsel Shri. B.A. Darak, and Shri. M.V. Deshpande, fairly submits that the petitioners and respondent No.5, all have retired from their services. 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders 2. In the light of the issue raised and submissions advanced by the learned Counsel, we find that in view of retirement of the parties, issue has became academic. Shri. B.A. Darak, learned Counsel submits that the said issue be kept open so that at appropriate stage, any other aggrieved party can raise such an issue. 3. In case, any other employee is aggrieved, he may pursue remedy as permissible in law. 4. In the light of statement made, the petition is disposed of. Rule discharged. [K.K. TATED,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] sut/OCT10/wp53.97