g IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmsGARH AT ‘ BILAsPUR (c.6.) w.P. (s) No. 1 €73 ’? /2o1o. PETITIONER ,w *’qi§m\ . k \ amgiW-W} 1 Narhar Prasad Rafhor‘e, Aged abouf 51 years, S/o Shri Meghnafh Ra’rhor‘e, Uer Division Teacher, Dis‘rr'ic‘r Insfitui'ion of Educa‘rion and Training Korba Dis‘rricf- Korba (6.6.) VERSUS Sfa’re of Chha’rTisgar‘h . Through Secrefary, School Educa‘rion Deparfmen‘r D.K.S. Bhawan, Raiur (6.6.) 2. Direc‘ror, Public Insfruci’ions Raisari‘ae.) i Disfricf Educa‘rion Officer Korba‘ (C.G.) Block Educa’rion Oficer f .2TiKarba, Dis’rricT- Korba (C.G.) ,5 The Principal, Dis‘rric‘r Ins’rifufion EsPONDENTs : 1. R a of Education & Training ( DIET) Korba (C.6.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA { /' pp p g H§GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH I BILASPUR WRIT PETiTiON {S} NO. 7837 OF 2910 PeiitEoner Narhar Prasad Rathore Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others (\M’it Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shfi Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri K.S.Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panei Lawyer for the State] respondents. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 14‘“ day of January, 2m 1,) The petitioner was initially appointed on a fixed pay of Rs.150/-. After completion of the probation period, the petitioner wae granted regular pay scale. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the case is asto Whether. the petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale wet. the date of initial appointment or after completion of probation period. r a 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu yfidré6moifhers Vs. State of MP. & others), ‘Wherein it was held that the similarly situated teachers were entitied. to reguiar pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6892/93., The said petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court uphoiding the [decision of the Tribunal to the effect that the Teachers/ Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale from date of initial appointment. .\ \Li Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also submits that this court, whiie considering the same issue in Amar Sai Ram & others v. State of Chhaifiisgerh & others NVP. (S) No.4725/2OD6} by order dated 01 .092006, allowed the petitioner to make a representation within a period of ten days, raising aii their grievances Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation raising all the grievances and in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law and the aforestated decisions, on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, subgect tc verification of the facts. in View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of. No order esto costs. Sd/— ‘ vSatish K. Agnihotri’ Judge l ashok