IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33225 of 2011 Rehana Khatoon Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 28.09.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Section 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was not named in the First Information Report. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in 161 Cr. P.C. statement the victim has stated that she went in the company of Md. Salamat @ Budhan since her family members wanted her to marry somewhere else and when she was recovered the family members assaulted her. The medical report as contained in Annexure- 3 reflects the assault injury on the person of victim girl. The name of petitioner sprang up on 06.07.2011 in the statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. of the victim when she named the petitioner as instigator on whose instigation the victim went in the company of Md. Salamat but she admitted that Md. Salamat did not establish any physical 2 relationship with her which is corroborated by the medical evidence as contained in Annexure-4. Considering inconsistency in the statement of the victim, the petitioner being lady not named in the F.I.R., and also the fact that thrust of accusation is against Md. Salamat, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No. 170 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. West Champaran, Bettiah, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)