gwzmwarxw gf Will”lIlIHHlHHllllllllltl IN THE HIGH COURT OF MHYA PRADESH lA’I‘ JABALPUR MISC. ’PE-TITION NO.. 2‘ OF ‘ ‘ 1994 ' PETITIO NER z National calliery Workers! FederatiGn through its enra ecretary 311 Gaa Prasad Shama, s/ Shri (mv. Gapai-Sharma, ged 62 years’ 5”“‘7, 3k] ‘g KL€xV£yj rent o , sErict side f , m Sarguja, M.P. Vs. 1. UniGn of nia tgh th Mni Off 6 Sha lh . Coa Inda Limit tough its chaian, Nai Subk sh oac’», Calcutta. hr rm 10 e§j 3 outh Eastern olfields Limited. . S C‘a v ‘ through s C.M.D. Seepat Rod, Bilaspur. w RE$PO NOE N‘I‘S : Id hmu e v / 3ecretary, istry 031, stri Bhavan. New Dei. 2 l i ed I; ECPIIQN ND RTICLES 2/22 OF THE NSTIC‘N OF IA. FOR ISSUE OF PPRPRIATE WRIT CERTIORARI, MAM§MU PRHIBIQN E'E‘. ETC. FG FRHTER APR§PRIATE P DIRECT Ii": NS . 5 1' Gel S :1 y o L nm a ; wma f a R v it a P‘P UER A 257 $TITU W AO OF S{ OTE C AND R U N HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 229 of 1994 : Nationai Colliery Workers Federation. PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Union of India & Others. PETITEON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA $3: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ‘ Present: None for the petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Advocate for the respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on ()5 day of October, 2010) 1. The matter is called for hearing. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuing the matter. 2. In View of the above, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/— l SATISH K. AGNEHOTRI t t Judge t‘/\ .. ”7/ ' t \ \