IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.858 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.858 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.858 OF 2008 Delavar Singh Negi ..Petitioner. V/s. Smt.Sita Sadguru Nadkarni ..Respondent. Mr.P.G.Lad for petitioner. CORAM : J.P.DEVADHAR, J. CORAM : J.P.DEVADHAR, J. CORAM : J.P.DEVADHAR, J. DATED : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATED : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2008. DATED : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard. 2. This petition is filed against the order dated 19th June, 2006 and order dated 20/10/2007 whereby the learned Judge of the Small Causes Court at Bombay as well as the Appellate Court of the Small Causes Court at Bombay have restrained the petitioner from forcibly dispossessing or taking possession of the premises from the respondent. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the claim of the respondent is based on forged documents and both the Courts below ought not to have granted injunction based on the photographs furnished - = : 2 : = - by the respondent. 4. The decision of the Courts below is based on some material on record and the said orders cannot be said to be perverse or contrary to law. Without going into the merits of the case, in my view, it would be just and proper to direct the lower Court to dispose of the Suit without being influenced by this order as well as the orders impugned in this petition. Accordingly, the trial Court is directed to dispose of R.A.D. Suit No.85 of 2006 as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 4 months from today. 5. Petition is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)