**1** IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8846/2009 Popatlal Bharmal Shah and others. ....Petitioners -VERSUS- Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and others. .....Respondents ........... Mr.Navin Parekh, Advocate i/b Ms.Helel Patel, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr.Y.P.Gandhi, Advocate for the Respondents Nos.3, 4-A, 10, 11 and 12. Mr.M.D.Pokale, Advocate for the Respondents Nos.5-A to 9. ........... CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : 14th October, 2009. P.C. : 1 Not on board. Taken on board. 2 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3 By the impugned order, in purported exercise of powers under Rule-11 of Order-VII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the Trial Court has rejected the plaint. In view of Section 2(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 a remedy of preferring an appeal is available to the Petitioner. Hence, Writ Petition is not entertained and the same is rejected by keeping the remedy open. 4 If any interim or ad-interim order granted by the Trial Court **2** is operating till today, the same will continue to operate for a period of two weeks from today to enable the Petitioner to file appropriate proceedings. [A.S. OKA, J.] kps