CWP(T) No. 6929 of 2008 02.11.2010 Present: Mr. O. P. Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. K. R. Kashyap, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No. 1 and 2. While serving as Inspector in the police force of the State, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner. It is not in dispute that penalty of censure was imposed upon the petitioner vide order dated 3.4.1999 (Annexure A-5). Appeal preferred by him also stood rejected by the appellate authority in terms of order dated 1.11.1999 (Annexure A-6). 2. It is the petitioner’s grievance that for the next higher post i.e. Deputy Superintendent of Police he was not considered by the D.P.C. held in the year 1999. As such petitioner was wrongly superseded and persons (private respondents) who were junior to him were promoted as Dy. S.P. 3. Record perused and returned. 4. From the record it is evident that petitioner’s name was recommended for promotion by the appropriate authority. The same was also considered by the D.P.C. not once but twice. Petitioner was found not fit to be promoted to the post in question. His name was considered in the meeting of the D.P.C. held on 9.7.1999 and 15.5.2000. -2- 5. Consequently the contentions raised by the petitioner are not borne out from the record. 6. Having perused the material on record it is quite evident that no legally enforceable right of the petitioner stands violated. Present petition without any merit is dismissed. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. November 2, 2010 (PK)