<?!!"?'5 E' F<mi.»n?B ^ill^ul-t IJtNVN BEFORE THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OFJUDICATURE AT BILASPURrc.G.^ IN THE MATTER OF W.P. (Ll N0 n, 2-03, /2010 J- PRAKASH LAHEJA __S/0 .. SHRI. S^afeof/'fr^?-1"^'' RAMESH LAL LAHEJA^FLAT.NO DF- 1, SANJAY APARTMENTS, VYAPAR VIHAR, BILASPUR. PROPRIETOR M/S KWALITY TILES, SECOTR-A, SIRGITTI INDUSTRIAL AREA ,BILASPUR [C.G]. VERSUS 1. THE EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, MINISTRY OF LABOUR, GOVT. OF INDIA) THROUGH THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, REGIONAL OFFICE, RAIPUR (C.G.) 2. RECOVERY OFFICER AND REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND .COMMISSIONER, RAIPUR [C.G]. PETITIONER w^-{v RESPONDENTS /RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT/ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED ^~sr •<<i<<i<n<i, siTilyis, isidiyij,-!. _^...^.£(U..^5...:2>9^.3^o, sn^i ^i Kfi'ti 3^1 'q^T (•jcl(3««»4) so °. non uie ann ivianinura wiona 05-07-2010 ynri v'inoa uesrimUKn, coun; snri r-'faueep oaxena, couns r-'euiiorier nas approacneu i notice dated 20/05/2010 'whereby cause as 10 wny ne snouiu noi D$ ceniTicaie issueci DV sumonsyQ 01 aiong vviin inieresi payaoie unu^i r'una ana iviisceiianeous rTovisiong Learneu counsei for tne p^li accoruance 'wiin law anQ appropriai i aKiny inio cons'ueraiion m\ peiiiion nas pee'n TI!€'Q siusinsi ine ^ lo linyjry uispose OH aie yeuLiun piaj qiraferi^ •wigf4-fs^ TfsReK ^silmsn^i n snrivasii^veE, ^s. ei for the peutloner. JS- ^. - -. . |ei Tor responaenis on aavance copy. |iis Court ssssiiiny valldlty o'f show causs the petitloner has be^ti required to show ; comiTiiuea in ppi^un sn ine exe^ju^yn ys ncer in in©maiier OT fecovery OT afresrs secnori / u OT ine crnpioyees' '-roviaeni ftci, 'i yo.si. iiuotier suDrTii?is<3 ?nai an tnejf insiiiuiior! ai'e sess inan ^u ana inereTore ine not covered and outsiue the purv'ew of 'nurnQsr OT empioyees wofKiny esiaoiisnmeni OT ine peiiuoner is opCEczuon oi ine MCL 01 E£?OZ. Learneu counsei ror responja'enis suurnrts inai ine peiiiioner nas ueen given a snovv eause notice anu iT tipe io BppjicaDiiiTy ors cyiisin Tsciuai s^ sno'w cause noiice 'wniCn 'vyouiQ D^ inie Reiiiioner nas arsv oojecuon "wiin regara pect, me peiiuoner may susrnii or repiy 10 i duiy considered by the inquiry officer in e oraers wouiu 'oe passea. s suufTiissions rnaoe ariu inai ine preseni >novv cause nouce, rt 'w'ouia ue aupropriaie sln^ the aforosalu subrfilss'oi'is on feco?u. Sdi- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge I'lU'fll <bftiTgi?irR!T, .sai-ITiprR —FS/147—2/2010—1,00,000. ^ ^\^