COCP No. 1940 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 1940 of 2010 Date of decision:- 30.11.2010 Sukhcharan Singh ......petitioner vs. Sh. Sukhchain Singh Gill ......respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: - Mr. Ramanjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S. S. Sahu, AAG, Punjab HEMANT GUPTA, J (ORAL) Petitioner filed a petition before this Court for directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, Bathinda to decide the representation dated 10.6.2010 (Annexure P-2) in accordance with law. Vide the said representation, the petitioner has made the grievance in respect of the theft at his house which was not being investigated by the police authorities. In an affidavit dated 23.11.2010 filed on behalf of respondent, it has been pointed out that FIR No. 43 dated 6.4.2010 was registered for an offences under Section 380 and 457 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Maur on the basis of the statement of Charanjeet Singh. The detailed facts have been given in respect of the allegations of the petitioner. It is pointed out that after recording of the statement of the petitioner, the police started investigation in case FIR No. 43 dated 6.4.2010 but did not find any clue regarding the thieves. It is stated that the investigation is still pending and on COCP No. 1940 of 2010 -2- completion of investigation a report shall be submitted to the Court and if aggrieved by such report, the petitioner can file his objections against the said report filed by the police. In view of the said fact, no further orders are called for in the present contempt petition. The present petition is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 30.11.2010 preeti