^811BI^^^I^^I ^^^^^^^^^i;'^-i:^^^^^^f^ y::'@:rSJNi;ffiKBgtl1'' '.'fc-ii'ti'uS:^"^ •• IN THE C^[S3o2— COURT OF C'HHATriSGASa AT BILASPCR WJP.(s)No. ...^^.....Jl ^Onksar Lal Socboir S/6 Shii Jageshar Ram SGmlioa- aged aboiB 40 yesss, EEIHWNER : Se&ool Twndifeod, Block Dongargcre Distt. Rapiandgacai (C.G.) VERSUS BESPONDENTS: 1. State of Chhattisgarii Through Secretaiy Departmeht of Educafion Mantraiaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur ^ ^°' ^ ^i. Disteiet Education Officer, Chhuria, Disfrict RaJHandgaoa (C.G.) d^'plEU ' ^^. V^ ^3?\ BIock Education Officer Block — ,.<3" , Clihima DislTiet - Rajnaiidgaon WMT PETITION U/A 226/27f0F TECE CONSTmmON OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRTTS IN THE NATUfiE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI ANB FOR OTHER SCTTABLE WRITS AND DIRECHONS The above named petitioiier most humbly and respectfatly begs to sabmitas under:- HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AX BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON-BLE MR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PETmON (S.l NO. 464 OF 2007 Petitioner versys Kesoondents Hemroi Kumbhkar State of Chhattisgarh cnd others WRIT PETmON (S.) N0. 465 OF 2007 Ptetitioner versus Rewondents Siddharth Chaure State of Chhattisgarh ond o'thers Petitioner WRTT PETTTION IS.) N0. 466 OF 2007 Ponch Ram Sohu versus Resoondents : State of Chhtrttisgarh ond others WRTT PFTTTION tS.) N0. 467 OF 2007 Petitioner Reaondents versus Monhamn Lol Pi'theuru State of Chhatt'isgarh ond o'thers WRTT PETHION (S.) N0. 468 OF Z007 Petitioner versus ResBondents Yaggaya Dattu Baghel State of Chhatl-isgarh and o-thers WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 469 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents verais Shiki Khaperday State of Chherttisgarh and others WRTT PETITION (S.yNO. 470 OF 2007 %> pt,? Petitioner Kespondents yerais Radhey Kishun Patel State of Chhott-isgarh and others WRTT PETmON (S.) N0. 471 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents versus MBngonLal State of Chhatt'isgarh ond o-thers WRTT PETITION (S.) N0. 472 OF 20)7 Petitioner Respondents yerais Dhal Singh Sonwani Stnte of Chharttisgarh cnd olhers WRTT PETTTION 15.) N0. 473 OF 2007 Petitioner ResBondBntS yersus Onkar Lal Sonboir Storte of Chhattisgarh ond others WRTT PETCTION (S.t N0. 474_OF_2007 Petitioner : Shiv Kumar Sharma versus Resoondents : State of Chhattisgarh and o'thers WRTT PETTTION fS.t N0. 478 OF 2007 Petitioner ; Rajendra Kumar Sa9ar versus Resbondents : State of Chhatl-isgarh and others WWT PETmON (5.1 N0. 476 OF 2Q01 PetH-roner ; Makhanbl Thakur versus Respondents : State of Chharnisgarh and o-thers WRFT PETTTKMM fS.) h».477 OF 2007 Petitioner yerajs Resoonctents Fool Chand Komleriiwur State of Chhattisgarh ond others WRIT PETTTION (5.1 N0. 478 OF 2007 Petitioner yersys Respondents Rajendroi Kumar Dewongon Slate of Chhatt'isgarh and olhers And WRTT PFnTION (5.1 N0. 479 OF 2007 Petitioner Responcksnts yersys Jcycnt Kumar Shendey State of Chhattisgarh ond others Present : Mr. R.K. Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sushil bubey, Sovemment Adwcate for the State/respondents. OftDER (Passed on 24th Ocy of Jamwy, 2007) 1. Learned counsel oppearmg for -the petitioners as well as leamed Sovemment Advocate appearing for the State/respondents jointly submit +hat -the facts and question of law involved in the present batch of writ petitions ure sqiwrely covered by •the decision of this Court' m the case of yoshwwvt Kuwew Bheiradwaj vs. Ihlrie^al CmyMV/Hon. ^»yend anethw^. 2. In subsequent cases. i.e., Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (.ffofwsli Kumw Vwwam. Thf Stats ffwf. af Chhattisyuii anrf anvthw) ond o-ther connected mort-ters, decided by -this ^] Court- on 15-12-2006, puraiant to Ihe memo dcrted 28-1-1995, isajed by the Secretary. Bonrd of Secondar/ Education, Bhopal ond the prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination. it was ctarified that the nomenclature of -the Basic Troining Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed ond iwKimed as Diploma in EAication. i.e., D.Ed. Accordmgly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 (jSaf»dift/mar Vermaw. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh widcnolfiei) (Supra). 3. For Ihe aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are di^iosed of in terms of the decision of •this Court in the matter of Yadiwcvit Kimar fifran»<A*e[/(Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whe-ther the petitioners hnve acquired B.T.I./O.Ed. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 ond 1-3-1999 flnd further whe-rtier -they have been paid -two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 4. A copy of •this order be pkiced on the record of •the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006ai)A JR<696 Thakur