IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8779 of 2011 PUKARI YADAV @ RAM PUKAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.03.2011 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 342, 504, 353/34 of the I.P.C. and 3(i)(x) of the S.C. & S.T. (P.O.A.) Act. It is alleged against the petitioner that he alongwith others came to the office of the informant and forcibly wanted to implement their own plan which was not included in yearly work plan of the panchayat and the petitioner also abused the informant. It is submitted learned counsel for the petitioner that it is not mentioned in the F.I.R. that in the office of the informant other persons were also present. Hence, the occurrence cannot be treated to have taken place public view. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner namely Pukari Yadav @ Ram Pukar Yadav, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with Sikandra (Chandradip) P.S. Case No.394 of 2009. Ibrar/- ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)