1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5425 OF 2009 (Narayan s/o Kisandas Nerkar) WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6296 of 2009 (Bharat Prahakar Shimpi and others vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr. R.L.Kute, Advocate, and Mr. A.G.Talhar, Advocate, for the respective petitioners. Mr. R.P.Phatke, Additional Government Pleader, for respondent State. Mr. Gangakhedkar, Adv., h/f Mr. M.S.Deshmukh, Adv., for respondent no.6. Mr.A.G.Talhar, Adv.,for respondent no.7 in WP No.5425/2009. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE :13th NOVEMBER, 2009. 1. We have heard all the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. We direct respondent no.1 to decide the revision applications after hearing necessary parties, within two months from the date of receipt of this order, on its own 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders merits, along with the intervention applications filed by any of the parties. 3. The petitioners undertake to remove objections in the revision petitions, if not already removed. Both the petitions are disposed of. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [NARESH H.PATIL, J.] agp/wp5425-09gr