IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.310 of 2009 1. JALESHWAR MAJHI 2. BALESHWAR MAJHI BOTH SONS OF LATE YADU MAJHI, RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE- MUSARAM CHHAPRA, P.S. – DURODA, DISTRICT SIWAN ----- DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS. Versus 1. KAMAL MAJHI 2. DHANPAT MAJHI 3. SWAMI NATH MAJHI 4. SHANKAR MAJHI ALL 1 TO 4 ARE SONS OF LATE DHINABAN MAJHI 5. MADAN MAJHI SON OF LATE ANANT MAJHI 6. KALIA DEVI DAUGHTER OF LATE ANANT MAJHI 7. BHIM MAJHI @ BHIKHAM MAJHI SON OF LATE DASA MAJHI ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MUSARAM CHHAPRA, P.S. DURODA, DISTRICT SIWAN. ------- PLAINTIFFS-OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 2. 26/2/2009 Heard Mr. Ambuj Nayan Choubey, learned counsel for the petitioners. The defendants-petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 10.12.2008 passed by the learned Munsif 2nd, Siwan, in Title Suit No. 34 of 1992 whereby he has allowed certain amendments in plaint. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after passing of several years of the filing of the suit, amendment petition has been filed by the plaintiffs for amendment in plaint to the extent as described in its petition which has been brought on record by this Civil Revision as Annexure-2. The trial court having considered the rival submissions has come to the conclusion that the amendments are necessary in the interest of justice and has allowed the same, however, on - 2 - imposition of cost of Rs. 700/-. I do not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order dated 10.12.2008. As a result this Civil Revision application is dismissed. S.Ali (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)