IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2009 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 28625 of 2009(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. ALEYAMMA JOHN, AGED 64 YEARS, W/O.LATE CHANDY JOHN, RESIDING AT VATTAKUNNEL, PULICKAL, ERAYILKADAVU, KOTTAYAM. 2. ICY JOHNY, AGED 30 YEARS, D/O.CHANDY JOHN, RESIDING AT VATTAKUNNEL, PULICKAL, ERAYILKADAVU, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.M.J.THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KOTTAYAM MUNICIPALITY, KOTTAYAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, KOTTAYAM MUNICIPALITY, KOTTAYAM ADV. SRI.SIBY MATHEW FOR R1 & 2 SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU FOR R1 & 2 SRI.B.PREMNATH (E) FOR R1 & 2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.28625 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of October, 2009 JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Ext.P2. Learned counsel for the municipality states that being a statutory matter, Ext.P2 could be treated as a provisional order to which the petitioner can object and that the petitioner will be heard in relation to the matter and final decision taken in accordance with law. Let a statutory decision be taken stating reasons, so that, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, she can carry the matter to the competent statutory authority for consideration. The impugned Ext.P2 shall not be enforced as if it is an order but shall be treated as a notice. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.28/10.