IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1191 of 2002 1.Bachchu Rai Son of Ram Chandra Rai 2.Narayan Rai Son of Late Muneshwar Rai 3.Mohan Rai So of Jai Kishun Rai 4.Lekha Rai Son of Late Sukhan Rai 5.Suresh Rai Son of Late Baldev Rai 6.Sone Lal Rai Son of Late Shravan Rai, all residents of Village Sherpur Shankardas, P.S. & Anchal Patepur, District- Vaishali ----- Petitioners. Versus 1.The State of Bihar 2.The Additional Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur 3.The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Mahua Vaishali 4.Anchal Adhikari, Patepur, Vaishali 5.Panchu Rai Son of Late Preman Rai 6.Budhan Rai Son of Late Ram Autar Rai 7.Phuljharia Devi W/O Late Shobhit Rai 8.Jagdish Rai Son of late Shobhit Rai 9.Sanjay Rai Son of Late Shobhit Rai 10.Chulhai Rai Son of Late Ram Dutt Rai, all residents of Village Sherpur Shankar Das P.S. & Anchal Patepur, District- Vaishali ---- Respondents. --------- 3. 24.10.2008 None appears on behalf of the petitioners. Heard Mr. Suraj Kant Mishra for respondent nos. 5 to 10. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. It arises out of mutation proceedings with respect to Kheshra no.1126, appertaining to Khata No. 291 covering an area of 0.68 decimals. Respondent nos. 5 to 10 herein filed an application for mutation of the land in question before the learned Anchal Adhikari, Patepur, who disposed of the same by his order dated 18.7.2000 (Annexure-1), passed in Batbara(Jamabandi ) Case No. 553 of 2000-2001, whereby he 2 ordered for mutation of the lands in favour of respondent nos. 5 to 10 herein. Aggrieved by the order, the present petitioners filed an appeal which was allowed by order dated 24.7.2001 (Annexure-2), passed by the learned L.R.D.C., Mahua District- Vaishali, in Case No. 8 of 2000-2001(Mohan Roy & ors.V. Panchu Roy and others), whereby the appeal was allowed and the order of the learned first authority was set aside. Aggrieved by the appellate order, the present respondents preferred revision application which has been allowed by the order dated 22.12.2001(Annexure-3), in Mutation Case No. 2 of 2001-2002 (Panchu Roy and ors.V. Mohan Roy and ors.), passed by the learned Additional Collector, Vaishali, whereby the appellate order has been set aside, and that of the first authority has been restored. It appears that the learned revisional authority has found that the land in question is Gair Mazurua Aam land and belongs to the State of Bihar. In fact, Title Suit No. 452 of 2000 is currently pending for adjudication. In that view of the matter, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The matter shall be decided by the Civil Court. It goes without saying that the findings recorded in the mutation case including the present writ petition, if any, shall remain confined to the limited purpose of the mutation proceedings. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar , J.)