LN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURlt^ CIVIL REVISION N0. J ?' OF 2008 APPLICANT : NON-APPLICANT N0.2 -.-.^-^' •^-"-^"' ^..--•^ 'x^ ^ i.y RESPONDENTS NON-APPLICANT N0.3 NON-APPLICANT N0.3 Rambati, aged about 60 yeas By caste Panika, Widow of Late Bhaiyalal, Resident of Village Medhuka, Police Station Gaurella, Tahsil Pendraroad, District Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS Terasiya Bai, aged about 45 years Wife ofJiyalal, D/o Late Bhaiyalal, Resident of Village Medhuka, Police Station Gaurella, Tahsil Pendraroad, District Bilaspur (C.G.). Sona Bai, aged about 65 years Caste Panika, Wife of Sukhram, Resident of Village Shikarpur, Police Station Bhalumada, Tahsil Kotma, District Anuppur, (M.P.). 3. Aam Janta <-" CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE^ODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE,1908 L.-....--————-^—: I?b TmcOT^TT^ V^TWI ^i«10)^1, yal<<i<i<a, Rlril^^ ..C.fk.....^-.. STI^^TOTR^ich ?CT3TT^5Tfp+licp 3TT^9T q^q»(tjcll^d^) ^20^ '^-. ^ ^cTT^R^TfiBcTCT^^T S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. 03.2.2010 Shri CD Sharma, Advo^ate for the appticant. Heard on admission. The instant revision i^ 14.01.2008, passed by Adcfitional District Bilaspur, in Misc. Civ| whereunder the appeal prejferred dismissed affirming the ord^ Civil Judge Class-1, Pendraro^d The brief facts of the preferred an application for ^ herseif to be daughter of th^ deposited with the State Bar^ the account of deceased. The trial court, on appr| ptaced, passed the order certificate in favour of appeij cpi<iIw<Tlrt +ii*icl)T^'l^^l \f^t^i<< ^?3lKl^l3TI^'5T Aaarwal s directed. against the order dated District Judge, Pendraroad, Appeal No. 11 -A/07, whereby and by the applicant has been r dated 23.11.2007 passed by the in Succession Case No. 09/06. ;ase are that, the respondent No. 1 rant of succession certificate stating deceased Bhaiyalal for the amount k of India, Branch at Pendraroad in sciation of evidence ied and material and directed to grant succession ant as well, as respondents holding them equally entitle for the a|nount. The appeal preferred by the appellant was also dismissed|bythe Firjfet Appellate Court. |isei appearing for the applicant and Ipugned passed by both the courts Having heard the cousl having perused the order in| betow, 1 do not find any subst^nce in the instant revision. ^. y \jiw|^iqi«q,tPTil^l^Ka, R«W^<< HTO^T^^iT^ W120 W^^TcpTR^icb cT^TT3TT^$Tw+li<P ../ Sahu 3TT^?T q5R»(^cl^el^) ?;!RTTW ^rftPT 3H^5T it is trite iaw that unll without jurisdiction or the fi| court should not interfere with] cpi^io<ni *ii+ioT^'fc^ <<Ri^$i^ ^3lKt^3H^9T ^ss the order is patently illegal or [idings recorded are perverse, this |concurrent finding arrived at by both the courts below in exercise ^ its revisional jurisdiction. It is also trite law that the grant of suc{;ession certificate only gives right to collect the amount, but the p^irty aggrieved is always free to file a Civi! Suit to claim his/her sharle or to claim his/her title. In view of foregoin^ substance is liable to be andl costs. , the revisions being devoid of is hereby dismissed. No order asto Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge % y