IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 7TH MARCH 2008 / 17TH PHALGUNA 1929 W.P(C).No. 6199 of 2008(K) --------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- M/S. ELIZABETH CONDUCTORS, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, PAPPANAMCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, KUNJUMOL CHERIAN. BY ADV. SRI.VPK. PANICKER RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECREARY, VYDHYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,VYDHYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, TC & M, VYDHYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.P. THAJUDHEEN, SC FOR KSFE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/03/2008, ALONG WITH WPC NO.6221 OF 2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) Nos. 6199 & 6221OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 7th March, 2008 J U D G M E N T In these writ petitions, the challenge is against Ext. P11 by which the purchase orders issued were allegedly amended by the respondents unilaterally. It is seen that this was done despite Ext. P9 judgment which required the respondents to consider, hear and decide on Ext. P8 claim raised by the petitioners. Be that as it may, aggrieved by Ext. P11 petitioners have filed Ext. P12 representation seeking reconsideration of the matter and the learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the representations so made by them are pending consideration of the 3rd respondent. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3. Having regard to the submissions made by both sides, these writ petitions are disposed of directing that the 3rd respondent shall take into account and consider Ext. P12 representations. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 3 months of production of a copy of this judgment. W.P.(C) Nos.6199 & 6221 OF 2008 - 2 - Needless to say that while considering Ext. P12, the 3rd respondent shall not be guided by Ext. P11 order. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-