SiNGLE BENCH (1) G-6r \<^^ IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P. (Sl N0. ^A^ of2009 PETITIONER A<Q^. ^:.^,1'^...--- ^°^2^ /••'' ..•-',^^ L.-''' Murari Lal Raikwar, aged about 57 years, S/o Late Shri Basant Lal Raikwar, Upper Division Teacher, R/o Indira Ward, Behind Sikh Gurudwara, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) ^ ,-;y^-'' ^ sy:.. ^^•••>" VERSUS ^^v' RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director, Lok Shikshan, Chhattisgarh Pension Bada, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) 5. The Collector Cum District Election Officer, Bastar, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ ^^ [_.„. HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR • .^/ ^;. WR1T PETITION (S) N0.3840 OF 2009 PETiTIONER RESPONDENTS Murari LaS Raikwar Versus State 6f Chhattisgarh.& Others QA/rit Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitutlon of tndia)' Single Bench : Hon'bie Shjfl Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Kunaj Das, counsel forthepetitioner. Shri N.N. Roy, Paqel, Lawyer for the State. 1) 2) 3) Gowri ORDER'CORAU' (Passed on this 24th day of February, 2010) 'With the consent of tearned oounseS appearing for the parties, the petitlon is heard finaily. The petitioner has filed this petition chailenging the order dated 30-6-2009. By vit-tue of'the interim order .dated .27-7-2009 passed by this Court, the petitioner is contJnuing at'lhe o.riginal piace of postlng. No ; effect could : be given'; to. the impugned order dated 30-6-2009, due to the interim order dated 27-7-2009. • ,, • . Be that as it msy\ witli.the passage of time this petition has become infructuous; as the period of transfer is notappjicable forever. At this point of time; it Is not necessaiy to examirte the. ieaaiity and vaildity of the irnpugned order. However, the respondent authorities are at liberty to appropriate orders keeping'in vlew the pubiic interest and adminlstrative exigency, without insisting on compliance of the impugned'order. In view of foregoing, the writ petition is'disposed of. No order astocosts. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge