1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.256 OF 2009 Sou Sangita N. Bajare ...Petitioner v/s The Sarpanch, Village Panchayat Ravalas, Tal.Niphad, District Nashik and ors. ...Respondents Mr R.N. Gite for Petitioner. Ms S.S. Bhende, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr U.R. Mankapure for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND K.K. TATED JJ. DATE : 24TH NOVEMBER 2009. 2 P.C. :- 1] By this petition, the petitioner makes grievance against the resolution dated 30th November 2006. By that resolution, the petitioner has been removed from the office of the President of the Committee of the Village Panchayat by name Bharat Nirman Panipurvatha Yojana and in her place, some other member has been nominated as President. It is clear from the resolution that the petitioner continues to be a member of the Sub-Committee. The learned counsel appearing for petitioner submits that her removal is under section 49 of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act 1958. Perusal of section 49 of the said Act shows that it does not provide any tenure of the constituted Committee, the petitioner continues to be the member of the Sub-Committee. All that is done by the resolution is that she is substituted by other member as President. The learned counsel appearing for petitioner relies on the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in writ petition No.4773 of 2007 dated 14th February 2008 3 (Vijaysingh N. Rajput v/s State of Maharashtra and others). In our view, this is not a matter to be interfered with by High Court in its extraordinary jurisdiction under the Constitution of India. Petition is therefore frivolous and is rejected. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. ( JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH ) ( JUSTICE K.K. TATED )