IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44461 of 2009 BINDESHWAR PRASAD @ BINDEY, Son of late Yamuna Mahto Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.12.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304B, 120B/201 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is the father in law and the motive for the occurrence is that the husband of the deceased was having an illicit relationship with one Priti Kumari and therefore, wanted to remove her from the scene, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 17.8.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nawada in connection with Kashichak P.S.case No. 20/2009, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner, and (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays 2 the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Spd/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)