HiGH COURT OF CHHATTtSGARH: B1LASPUR Writ Petition (0 No. 2615 of 2007 Petitioner Plaintiff Smt. Kusum Bai Gupta, aged about 55 years, wife of Shri Jagdish Prasad Gupta, Occupation Business, resident of Kududand, Nagar, Tahsil and District Bilaspur, CG. Respondents Defendants 'll ^;. Versus 1) Smt. Dukaia Bai, aged about 80 years, wife of Late ShyamSal Gupta, resident Qf Viliage Pipartarai, Tahsil Kota, Dist. Bilaspur, CG. 2) Smt. Ambika Bai, aged about 60 years, wife of DurgaPrasad Gupta, Housewife, resident of Kila Ward, Juha Bitaspur, Nagar, Tahsii and Districi Bilaspur,CG. 3) Vinod Kumar Gupta, aged about 38 years, son of Late Laxmi Prasad Gupta, Occupation Businessman. 4) Rajesh Kumar Gupta, aged about 36 years, son of Late Laxm i Prasad Gupta, occupation Businessman, Both respondents no. 3 and 4 residents of Mungeli Road, Kudadand Nagar, Tahsii and District BI!aspur,CG. 5) Shatrughan Prasad Gupta, aged about 48 years, son of Late Shyamia! Gupta, Occupation Businessman, resident of Krishna Nagar Ward. Juna Bilaspur, Nagar, Tahsii and District Bilaspur, CG. 6) Smt. Nirmala Bai, aged about 48 years, wife of Krishna Kumar Gupta, resident of ^". <• -. •^s^ -2- Krishna Nagar Ward, Juna laspur, Nagar, Tahsil and DistrictBiiaspur,CG. 7) Jagdish Prasad Gupta, aged about 57 years, son of Rambharos Gupta, Caste Hindu, resident of through Jagdish Kirana Store, Main Road.Kududand, Nagar, Tahsil and District Bilaspur, CG. 8) Stateof Chhattisgarh, Through Colleetor, Biiaspur, CG. (Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India) SB: Hon'bie Shri Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Shri H.B. Agrawai, Sr. Advocate with Shri Pankaj Agrawal, counselfor the petitioner. Ku. Dipali Pandey, Panel La^vyer for respondent No-8/State. ORA1- ORDER (Passedon 30th Apri!, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take reeourse to aiternative remedy that may be avaiiabie to him, to which learned counsel appearing for respondent No.S/State has noobjection. s 2. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty. No order as to costs. - Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Raju