IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13793 of 2011 Jai Chand Yadav, S/O-Sri Naresh Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04 24.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named in the first information report and it is specific case of the prosecution that petitioner and first information report named accused Pappu Yadav along with one unknown person opened fire on the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in course of investigation, the informant has implicated several other persons in his further statement and almost all the aforesaid persons have already been granted privilege of bail. It is also submitted by him that according to prosecution case, three persons opened fire but post- mortem report reveals that only two gun-shot injuries on the person of the deceased was found. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, nature of allegation as well as criminal antecedent of the petitioner, I do not feel it proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 1079 of 2010 arising out of Barhara (Raghubansh Nagar) P.S. Case No. 133 of 2009 is, hereby, rejected. However, learned trial court is directed to conclude the trial of the petitioner within nine months from the date of receipt of this order and if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within the 2 above stated period, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. Let this order be communicated to the concerned court through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)