THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.22019 of 2009 DATED: 24.02.2010 Between: Gurajala Adinarayana Swamy. .. Petitioner. And The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by the District Collector, Visakhapatnam District, and others. .. Respondents. ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the proceedings dated 11.07.2008 issued by the 4th respondent-Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam Rural at Chingdillei, and consequential proceedings dated 14.08.2008 issued by the 2nd respondent-Joint Collector, Visakhapatnam. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, it is brought to the notice of this Court that against the consequential proceedings dated 14.08.2008 issued by the 2nd respondent, which is under challenge herein, one G.Gopi Krishna, who is the son of the petitioner’s brother, has already filed a writ petition in W.P.No.13233 of 2009 before this Court. In the said writ petition, it was represented for the petitioner therein that by the time the impugned order therein was received by the petitioner therein, the representation filed before the Tahsildar was disposed of on 09.08.2008, and therefore, the question of again approaching the Tahsildar, as was directed in the impugned order therein, does not arise. However, this Court, in the said writ petition, having observed that against the order dated 09.08.2008, statutory remedy of appeal is available before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, disposed of the writ petition, by an order dated 12.11.2009, keeping it open to the petitioner therein to file an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, against the order dated 09.08.2008, if so aggrieved, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, and on such filing of the appeal, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, was directed to entertain the same without raising any objection as to limitation and dispose of the same, uninfluenced by any of the observations made in the order dated 14.08.2008, in accordance with law. Pursuant thereto, the said G.Gopi Krishna is stated to have already filed an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, and the same is pending. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on merits, the petitioner is directed to get himself impleaded, by filing a petition, in the appeal purported to have been filed by the said G.Gopi Krishna before the 3rd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, against the order dated 09.08.2008 passed by the 4th respondent- Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam (Rural), and on filing such implead petition, the 3rd respondent shall implead the petitioner as party to the appeal proceedings, and dispose of the appeal in accordance with law, after hearing both parties. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 24.02.2010 Note: Issue CC in three days B/o v v