IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 11265/2008 Decided on:23.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Manohar Lal. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Nemo For the Respondents: Mr. Ansul Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. No.1. Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he has put in ten years continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year. As per the contents of the reply filed by respondent No.2, the applicant will be regularized as per his turn strictly in accordance with the seniority. 2. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the case of 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 the petitioner as per the norms adopted by it since he has completed 10 years continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 23.12.2010 *awasthi*