1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Criminal Writ Petition No. 50 of 2009 [Ku. Rina U. Gedam Vs. State of Mah. & another] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. Amol Mardikar, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Fulzele, APP for respondents. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND R.C. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 06th March, 2009. 1. Heard learned Adv. Mr. Amol Mardikar for the petitioner and learned APP Mr. Fulzele for the respondents. 2. We wanted to verify whether the Superintendent of Police has looked into the complaint or not. We, therefore, directed by our order dated 10th February, 2009, as follows:- “3. Respondent No.2 is directed to file an affidavit, as to whether he has seen the complaint submitted by the petitioner, a copy whereof is at page 26-A to the petition, what directions he has given thereon, who is the officer supervising the investigation and that he would apply mind to the case and give proper directions.” 3. In response, the Superintendent of Police has filed an affidavit, and averred in paragraph 13 thereof as to action taken by him on the application submitted to him. The narrations in said para did not appear to us to 2 be adequate and satisfying and, therefore, we had called learned APP to produce for our perusal original of complaint referred to therein. 4. It is seen that the complaint was punctually attended to, as is seen from a bare look thereon as to date of receipt, its being forwarded to and received by Sub-Divisional Police Officer for further enquiry. 5. It is demonstrated through the affidavit that the Sub-Divisional Police Officer has conducted an enquiry and supervised the invest8igation. This apart, it is brought to our notice that the charge-sheet has been filed. 6. Learned Adv. Mr. Mardikar states that the petitioner is not satisfied with what the police has done so far, as no action is taken against Dr. Poonam Belokar. 7. We are of the view that if the complainant is not satisfied with the investigation, nothing precludes the complainant from pursuing the matter by way of filing a private complaint. 8. With above observations, we dispose of the petition. Judge Judge |Hedau| 3