i- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTlSGARH AT BILASF'UR WRIT PETiTION ( G- l N0.^''°^ OF 2011 ^ PEntIONER: A RESPONDENTg: VerSus / Bhaninati, D/o Bhola Vishwan^th, W/o Lalit Kumar Uike, sugeSS. abbut 31 years, R/o Bijabhata, Block Donga.rgaon, Tahsil Dongargaoh, District RajnandgaOn (CG). State df Ghhattisgarh, Through the SeGretary, DepaTtrHent of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Development, DKS BUawan, Mantral^ya, Raipur (CG). Secretary, Department of Health 8s FamilyWelfare, DKS Bhawang Marttralaya, Rsiipur ;(cG).;:..r,,:; ,,,,••; Commis§ibner, Depsirtment of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Developmeht, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Caitlpus, Raipur (CG). Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Rajnandgaon, Dist. Rajnahdgaori (CG). Tahsildar; Dongargaon, Dist. Rajnandgaon (CG). WRIT PETlTrON Ufir]EiE^ARTieLE2260FTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner, above named, most humbly and respeGtfuUy beg to submits as under: - ^ Arun HIGH GOURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : 81LASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 2383 OF 201 1. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Bhanmati Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others OA/rit Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution Qtlndia) Singie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate for the pefifioner. Shri Sushi! Dubey, Government Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAU (Psssed on this 4 day of May, 2011) 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to fhe respondent authorities to verifv caste certificate. 2. On perusal of the record, it appears that the petltioner has preferred eariier writ petition beingW.P.(S)No.1956/2011 (Bhanmati v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) praying for the same relief, as soughtfor bythe petitioner in this petition. The earlier petition was dismissed as withdrawn by order dated 11/04/2011 without granting Siberty to fiie a fresh petition on the same cause of action. 3. Thus, this petition is dismissed, as not maintainable. Sdf- Sa|tish K. Agnihotri Judge