IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20222 of 2009 1. SHEO SHANKAR SHUKLA, son of Chabinath Shukla 2. Chhabinath Shukla, son of late Satyanarayan Shukla Both residents of village-Sonabo, P.S.-Chainpur, District-Kaimur at Bhabua--- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners purchased a tractor and it was given on rent to ply by the complainant for Rs.5,000/- per month which was to be deposited in the loan account of the petitioners. But he did not comply and on query filed this case along with earlier cases with false allegations. There is not a cheet of paper regarding sale of the tractor rather the allegation made by the complainant, in my view also, is the sufficient material to constitute another offence. In any case, petitioners arrest cannot be justified. I agree with the submission. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Kaimur at Bhabua, in connection with Complaint Case no.378 of 2008 (Tr. no.2328 of 2008) , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )