IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2009 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 25490 of 2009(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.T.SHIBU, S/O. THOMANKUTTY, ATTOKKARAN HOUSE, KANAKAMALA P.O. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. MOHAMMED HASHIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: W.P.C. NO. 25490/2009 EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF REGULAR PERMIT. EXT.P2 REGISTRATION PARTICULARS OF THE STAGE CARRIAGE. EXT.P3 NOTICE DT. 22-6-2004. EXT.P4 REPLY DT. 1-7-2004. EXT.P5 REPLACEMENT APPLICATION DT. 26-8-2009. EXT.P6 ORDER DT. 25-8-2009. [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE. S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 25490 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 27th October, 2009. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a stage carriage operator. Since his original vehicle has outlived its utility by passage of time, the petitioner submitted Ext. P5 application for replacement of the vehicle. The petitioner's grievance is that the same is not being considered by the respondent. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also who submits that Ext. P5 can be considered expeditiously. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to consider and pass orders ons Ext. P5 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/