- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2272 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.2272 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.2272 OF 2005 Vinod Uttam Kamble ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Vinod Uttam Kamble for the Applicant Ms S.D.Shinde,A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 24,2005. : JUNE 24,2005. : JUNE 24,2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Counsel appearing for the parties. This application for bail is made by the Applicant who is facing prosecution for offences punishable under Sections 302,307,326 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code along with two other co-accused. 2. Charge sheet has been filed after completion of the investigation. A specific role has been ascribed to the Applicant by two Eye Witnesses. The allegation against the Applicant is that he assaulted deceased Raju with a sword. The P.M.Notes shows serious injuries on the person of the deceased. The cause of death mentioned in the P.M.Notes is haemorrhagic shock due to head injury. There is a recovery of sword at the instance of the Applicant. There is material to show the complicity of the Applicant in an offence of a very serious and grave nature. 3. Considering the material on record, I find no reason to - 2 - take a different view from the learned Additional Sessions Judge. Hence, Application is rejected. The learned Additional Sessions Judge will dispose of the trial as expeditiously as possible keeping in mind the fact that the Applicant is in custody for last more than two years. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE