'^ ?. IN THE HiGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHPLdxTHSGARH AT BILASpUR W.P.NQ. l~l4S / 2004 / Petitioner Versus /^ Respondents ^^^.—^^., ^^ ^ro^%. ^'^ 1 "^^.-Ati i.MW^ Y-. ^ %:'!^"-^^.^ •v^n^c^^ 'h u- ^>'" ^^ Preni Chajid Psjiigrahi S/o Late PaTmsjiajid Pejiigraiii Aged aboiit 27 yea-rs, R/oVillage Asna, Tehsil Jagdalpur, Dist: Bastar-(C.G.) ^Y 1. State of Chhattisgaj-h Through : The Secretsjy Forest Depa-rtaient Mantralaya, Raipur-(C.Ge) ^.^•'^^'- .^y ^y iy: ^,.-y ^^••" <»^<%K 2 - ^ The Principal Chief Consewator of Forest (Administration), Raipur-(C-G-) 3. The Conservator of Forest ^ Jagdsipur Circle, Jagda-lpur-(C.G,) ,^^%' ^ y^s.^ ^econ Bijapur, 4. The Diyisional Forest Offic^r, West Bas-tar < (General Forest Division) JBI f^ t>U.7 Dist: Bijapur-(C-G.) ' p^ The Collector \0 ^x WRIT PETITION U/A Dmt: Bijapur-(C.G.) ./ 227 OFTHE CONSTITtJTION OF INDIA r— 1<S^^ —78 T^T ^ll^ld4, ^Tl1^l4l<o, [®l<rtl^^< ^W^ST ^^B^i / ••^^200 ^T^T1T?^ (^Gii^^) ?• ,/^1^l'^ifete' i^m 3?T^i - IK^ l^il^R: ^if^ 3:II^¥1 SB: Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinkeri 08.08.2009: Shri Prafulla Bharat, coun^ Shri Sumesh Bajaj GA for t| el for the petitioner. ie respondent/State. Grievance of the petitionerj Panigrahi was an employee of tt|i on 6.9.1997 while working a^ Department. After the death of h| compassionate appointment and the Forest Conservator Jagdalpur| there was no vacancy in the Wesf: ifthe petitioner is wHling to join ir his consent to this effect. In repl^ petitioner did give his consent place but he could not get the apj was to be finalized, re-organisatio| Contention of the State petitioner is not covered with th| therefore he is not entitled At this stage, counsel for th| to withdraw this petitionwith lib^ respondent No.3. He prays for ^TOfeT^h 'HR^I ^ ft^ <psi<^E< iR-stf^TS^ Diwaker. is that his father late Parmanand le State Government and he died an Accountant in the Forest js father petitioner had applied for ^pn 15.7.1999 he was informed by |that his case was kept pending as Circle. He was also informed that some other place. he could give to the letter dated 15.7.1999 the |n 14.9.1999 to join in any other )ointment because when the case ofthe State took place. tounsel is that the case of the i|s policy of the Government and appointment. petitioner submits that he wants ^rty to make a representat^on to direction to respondent No.3 for for corrjpassionate ^ fUSiSS^S :SS£^ ^•^^^_^ I:gICA-78 x ^^y ^r^T^T'^te WTi^rr^T^^w ^Nr- ^N^. ^ 'S'ST T^i<4i<n^, ^Til<4^i<o, f«<di'y^< N1^<y(t ^sNI^ "W^200 ^i^r ^^ (yit^^) '^iTW ^fi^ 3^¥T -2-- giving sympathetic consideratj^ the same expeditiously as the| absence of compassionate appt)intment Accordingiy, the petitiotji liberty as aforesaid. If the petiti4)her period of three weeks from the| respondent No.3 is expected accordancewith law. ^8^F<rt<41t< 'RT^ff ^* 'fe^°iF^^K '^3ff?R3T[^ir ^n to his representation and decide petitioner is facing hardship in the |)intment. is dismissed as withdrawn with makes a representation within a |date of receipt of copy ofthis order, [o decide the same expeditiously in Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge