1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1413 OF 2011 (M/s. R.K. Enterprises vs. General Manager, Contract Management Cell and another) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : MARCH 24, 2011 Heard Shri Purohit, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Mehadia, learned Counsel for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is in respect of the representation made by the petitioner to the respondents in view of Clause 5.7 of the general terms and conditions of the agreement executed between petitioner and respondent Western Coalfields Ltd. Shri Purohit, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner has written a letter dated 23/26.6.2010 to the respondent Western Coalfields Ltd. for re-appropriation of quantity and 2 the respondent Western Coalfields Ltd. vide communication dated 30/31.12.2010 informed the petitioner that whatever decision is taken, will be communicated to the petitioner. However, since no communication has been received by the petitioner from the respondent Western Coalfields Ltd., the petitioner is praying that respondent Western Coalfields Ltd. may be directed to communicate the decision in this regard. So far as challenge to subsequent floating of tender raised by the petitioner is concerned, we are not inclined to show indulgence. However, since communication dated 30/31.12.2010 itself demonstrates that the decision would be communicated to the petitioner, we expect the respondent Western Coalfields Ltd. to communicate decision in respect of application of the petitioner for re-appropriation of quantity, within a period of two weeks from today. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE khj 3