SBCWP 1287/2008. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. O R D E R Surajmal and ors. Versus Madanlal and ors. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1287/2008. Date of Order : 13/02/2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri R.P. Vijay for the petitioners. ****** BY THE COURT:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Thise writ petition has been filed against the order dated 5/1/2008 whereby application of the petitioners for their impleadment in the suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent No.1 has been rejected by the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that petitioners are residents of village Jugrajpura in which fair price shop has been allotted to the plaintiff and the order directing the respondent to maintain status-quo has been passed by the trial court against the defendants. It is argued that the action was initiated against the plaintiff-respondent by the department on the complaint of the petitioners and therefore they are necessary party. SBCWP 1287/2008. 2 On perusal of the impugned-order, I find that the contest is between the plaintiff on one hand and the defendant District Supply Officer Sikar, Enforcement Inspector Shrimadhopur, Sub- Divisional Officer Shrimadhopur and District Collector Sikar, on the other, who are already party to the suit. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not satisfy the court as to how they can be considered necessary party. In the course of arguments, it is contended that since the government functionaries are in collussion with the plaintiff, the petitioners are liable to be impleaded as defendants in the suit. No such material has been produced on record to substantiate this argument. In my considered view, the petitioners cannot be said to be necessary party to the suit. The writ petition being devoid of merit is dismissed in limine. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil