IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS FRIDAY, THE 28TH MAY 2010 / 7TH JYAISHTA 1932 WP(C).No. 15931 of 2010(N) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. GIRIJA KUMARI, D/O. ANANDAN PILLAI, CHARUVILA VEEDU, VELAMANNOOR.P.O, KALLUVATHUKKAL, KOLLAM. 2. GEETHA, D/O. ANANDAN PILLAI, THIRUVONAM, -DO- BY ADV. SRI.G.BHAGAVAT SINGH RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. S.I OF POLICE, PARIPPADY POLICE STATION, PARIPPALLY.P.O, KOLLAM. 2. RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI, S/O. BHASKARAN PILLAI, VADAKKUMKARA VEEDU, VELAMANNOOR.P.O, KALLUVATHUKKAL, KOLLAM. 3. RAJENDRAN PILLAI, S/O. GOPALA PILLAI, R.S. NILAYAM, VELAMANNOOR.P.O, KALLUVATHUKKAL, KOLLAM. G.P., SHRI. C.M.NAZER FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 15931 of 2010 N - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of May, 2010 JUDGMENT Joseph, J. The petitioners have approached this Court complaining about harassment at the hands of the first respondent. 2. Briefly the case of the petitioners is as follows. The petitioners are defendants 1 and 2 in O.S. No. 146 of 2009 instituted by respondents 2 and 3 for injunction and to fix the boundary of 'F' schedule pathway. But the court below declined to pass any interim order. Thereafter, on receipt of notice, the petitioners appeared before the court and filed objections. The court also deputed Survey Commission and the Commissioner and the Surveyor visited the place, measured out the properties, prepared a plan and produced the same before the court below. It is after considering the entire documents that the court below W.P.(C).No. 15931 of 2010 2 declined to pass any order on the application for injunction. Thereafter the petitioners have started construction of the compound wall. It is alleged that the first respondent prevented them from constructing the compound wall. 3. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that on a petition received from petitioners all that the first respondent police officer done is to tell the petitioner to abide by the decision of the civil court. Going by the averments, the civil court has declined to pass any orders. The police officer cannot interfere in the civil disputes. There is no case that any crime has been registered. In such circumstances we direct that the first respondent shall not interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondents 2 and 3. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (K. M. JOSEPH) Judge (M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS) tm Judge