{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.394 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4134 OF 2005 Manik s/o Natha Kathote Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.417 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3511 OF 2005 Nathrao s/o Annasaheb Salunke Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.418 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5319 OF 2005 Shantavan s/o Sayaji Ubale Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.432 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1403 OF 2005 Madan s/o Manikrao Pawar Petitioner {2} Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.433 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1428 OF 2006 Ambadas s/o Baburao Shinde Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.S.R.Pande, advocate for the petitioners. Mr.V.H.Dighe, A.G.P. for respondents. CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 08th December, 2011 PER COURT: Heard Mr.Pande, learned Counsel for the petitioners. Learned A.G.P. Makes a statement that orders are passed in respective Revisions by the learned Minister in respect of claims of the respective petitioners. Consequently, compliance being made, the Contempt Petitions are disposed of. K.U.CHANDIWAL JUDGE adb/cp39411