l,,.^ IN THE HIGILC^URT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGAftHl ^ CONTEMPT PETITIONNo. /°^ /20Q5 PBTITIONER 1 j 1L.: RESPONDENTS ,/Mahesh Kumar Netam aged about 32 years, S/o Shri Shyam Lal Netam,R/o Post Modipara, Tahsil Khairagarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon VERSUS 1.0 Shri R.P. Bagai, Secretary, ~\ Ministry of Home, .Raipur v--^ .>y ..••• ^'•' ,ax-'^ »:.•• ^^5->" ?*'~.^9~v'" ^'.^ /^•fc^ 2.^ Shri N.M. Ekka, Under Secretary, Hnistry of Home, Raipur 3. Shri O.P. Rathore, Director General of Police, Raipur 4. Vivekanand Sinha, Superintendent of Police Rajnandgoan. SM^ COSTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTION 12 AND 15 OF COWTEMPT OF COURT ACT READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF COMSTITITTIQ1LOF INDIA -•—•——*—»AjiSfj-/<-*/» ^TlCT <1inrn«r.-tf .i i,.d..! i.i;..|.;-j|i|:.. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR: CHHATTISGARH Single Bench Hon'bte Shri H.L. Dattu, CJ. Contempt Petition No.1040F 2005 Petitioner Mahesh Kumar Netam Vs. Resoondents Shri R.P. Bagai and Others. Present: Shri Roshan Dubey, counsei for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (Passedon 28th February, 2007) The only direction issued by this Court is as under : " The petitioner is allowed to make a representation to respondent No.2 within 15 days from today raising all his grievances, and in turn, respondent No.2 is directed to decide the representation in an objective manner within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the same after considering the points raised by the petitioner in accordance with law." (2) Learned counsel for the respondents submit that they have considered the representation filed by the petitioner and decided the same in accordance withlaw. The assertion made by the respondents is not disputed by leamed counsel for the petitioner. (3) Since substantial compliance of the orders and directions issued bythis Court has already been done, further action need not be taken by me. Accordingly, the contempt petition is rejected. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- •" Chief Justice