IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.50042 of 2008 1. SRI RAM YADAV 2. AMIT YADAV @ AMIT KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 18.12.2008 Leave is sought to withdraw the application in so far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned. The application is dismissed as infructuous with regard to him. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and for the informant. . Petitioner no. 2 apprehends arrest in a Police case under Sections 307 and other provisions of the Penal Code. The submission is of a case and counter case. The allegations of assault have caused simply injury by hard blunt substance in a fracas at a telephone booth. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the counter case was found to be false. Be that as it may, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of injuries, let petitioner no. 2 , abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bhojpur at Ara in Behea P.S. case No.30 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)