IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.940 of 2005 In (CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE 10577/2000) Anand Mohan Tripathi, son of late Bansidhar Tiwari, resident of village- Fazalganj, P.S.- Sasaram, District- Rohtas ….. Petitioner/Appellant Versus 01. The Bihar State Electricity Board through its Chairman, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna 02. The Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna 03. The Joint Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna 04. The Member (Transmission), Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna 05. The Director of Accounts, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna ….. Respondents/Respondents For the Appellant:- Mr. Rabindra Pd. Singh, Advocate For the Respondent:- Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Advocate. ---------------------------------- 07. 25.11.2011 The present Appeal is filed against the order dated 28.6.2005 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 10577 of 2000 which is filed against the order of punishment, whereby the petitioner’s pension has been reduced by 10 %. A contention was sought to be raised before learned Single Judge as well as before us that the appellant would not be responsible for the delay in enhancing the load and it is some other officer who is responsible. It is also contended that the appellant has sought some documents so that he can file reply to the show cause but the same 2 are not provided to him. The learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the fixing of responsibility on an Officer depends on different facts of each case. In the present case as the Enquiry Officer gone into that question and found the appellant responsible, we cannot set aside the enquiry report on the ground that there is no material with regard to the perversity of the enquiry. We are not inclined to set aside the enquiry report and final order passed by the disciplinary authority. Accordingly, the Appeal stands dismissed. P.K. (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Vikash Jain, J.)