IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 28444 of 2007 Between: Ch. Venkata Subba Raju, S/o Krishna Murthy, Hindu R/o D.No.48-10-41 Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam-16. ..... PETITIONER AND 1The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam. 2The Station House Officer, Bhimili Police Station, Visakhapatnam Dist. 3Gandham Indira W/o Pavan Kumar, Hindu, R/o 54-12-33/5, HB Colony, Krishna College, Visakhapatnam. 4Gandham Rama Rao S/o Dayananda Roy, Hindu R/o 54-12-33/5, HB Colony Krishna College, Visakhapatnam. 5Gurram Rajasekhar S/o Not known R/o Flat No.217 Sector-2, D.No.1-56-22, M.V.P.Colony, Visakhapatnam. 6Gandioboyina Seetharam S/o Appala Swami R/o Rajalingampet. 7Yelepu Naga Surya Appa Rao S/o Krishna R/o D.No.54-12-7/3, H.B.Colony Yelepuvari Thota, Visakhapatnam. 8A.V.Seshagiri Rao S/o Not known Document Writer D.L.No.2/95, R.L.No.101/58, Bheemunipatnam. 9N.Venkata Rao Sub.Registrar. Sub Registrar Office, Bheemunipatnam. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ ofr Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not conducting investigation in crime No.180/2007 on the file of the 2nd respondent duly apprehending the accused in the said case and in not filing the final report as required under Sec.173 of Cr.P.C. as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct necessary investigation duly apprehending the accused and submit final report to the concerned court forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.CHIDAMBARAM Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: Sri Ch. Krupavanth, Advocate representing Sri K. Chidambaram, the learned counsel for the petitioner, wants to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. GODA RAGHURAM, J Date: 19.6.2008 cvm