IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30238 of 2011 Anil Kumar Modi Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- For the petitioner : Mr. Vinay Mistry, Adv. For the State : Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP ****** 02. 30.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. B-III-19/11 for offences under sections 16 (1)A of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1955, for reasons of violation of Section 2(ix)(j) and (k) of PFA Act read with Rule 32(b)(2) (iv) and Rule 32A and 37A of the PFA Rules, 1955, is named accused in this case with allegation of dealing with misbranded Zest Syrup. Submission is that he is whole-seller purchased the articles from manufacturer who may be liable for any irregularities. Invoice etc. has also been filed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, in connection with Complaint Case No. B-III-19/11, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)