RFA No. 3181 of 1998 (1) In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh RFA No. 3181 of 1998 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.10.2010 Raj Bahadur Nagar ..... Appellant vs State of Haryana and another ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Shailendra Jain, Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Mr. Kul Bhushan Sharma and Mr. C. L. Sharma, Advocates, for the appellants. Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. This order will dispose of following appeals as the same arise out of common acquisition:- RFA No. 3181 of 1998, RFA No. 2218 of 2000, RFA No. 2388 of 2007, RFA No. 2902 of 2008, RFA No. 3958 of 2009, RFA No. 2420 and 2421 of 2010. The land owners are in appeal before this Court against the award of the learned court below passed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, `the Act') seeking further enhancement in compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the State of Haryana vide notification dated 7.9.1992 issued under Section 4 of the Act, acquired the land situated in revenue estate of Village Mewla Maharajpur, Tehsil and District Faridabad, for the development and utilisation thereof as residential, commercial and institutional Sectors 44 and 47 at Faridabad. The Land Acquisition Collector vide his award dated 8.2.1995 assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ` 1,96,800/- per acre. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the landowners filed objections. On references under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below, determined the market value of the acquired land at different rates i.e. @ ` 90/-, ` 325/- and ` 238/- per square yard, vide different awards. These awards are impugned in the present set of appeals. RFA No. 3181 of 1998 (2) Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the claim of the appellants in the present set of appeals is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in RFA No. 4438 of 2008– State of Haryana and another vs Sailak Ram and others, decided on 1.9.2009, whereby compensation payable to the landowners for the acquired land was determined at ` 280/- per square yard. Learned counsel for the State did not dispute the fact that the claim in the present appeal is squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment. Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in Sailak Ram's case (supra), the appeals are disposed of in the same terms. 12.10.2010 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge