CWP-8777/2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. SB CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.8777/2010 Ghanshyam Lal Pandey Versus State of Rajasthan & ors. DATE OF ORDER : 14/07/2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI *** Mr.Sanjay Sharma, for petitioner. The petitioner, who attained the age of superannuation in October, 2008, was granted re-employment on certain terms and conditions by the respondents vide order dated 25/09/2008. Counsel submits that under the policy of rationalization, one regular teacher has been posted as Lecturer (Hindi) vide order Anx. 3 dt. 20/06/2010 only to oust the petitioner from the post which he was holding. The submission made is without substance for the reason that the petitioner has already attained the age of superannuation and was granted re-employment on certain terms and conditions which also stipulate that he will be allowed to continue for two years which otherwise does not mean that he has a right to continue upto the period of two years from the date of re-employment and if the authority has taken decision to post a regular teacher, the petitioner can not have any grievance and even otherwise, no right, conferred under Rules or any guidelines can be said to have been CWP-8777/2010 2 infringed. This Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. Raghu/p.2/ 8777-CW-2010-final.doc