IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 25TH SEPTEMBER 2009 / 3RD ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 13411 of 2009(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SUBAIDA.M, PERINTHOTTATHIL HOUSE, PAZHOOR P.O., MAVOOR, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE PROFESSOR AND HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT, TELECOBALT THERAPY UNIT, MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, KOZHIKODE. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA HEALTH RESEARCH AND WELFARE SOCIETY, (KHRWS)GENERAL HOSPITAL CAMPUS, RED CROSS ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, TALUK HEAD QUARTERS HOSPITAL, TALIPARAMBA. 4. SHEEBA K.V., PAY WARD CLEANER, (DAILY WAGES), TALUK HEAD QUARTERS HOSPITAL, TALIPARAMBA. ADV. SRI.M.AJAY,SC,KERALA HEALTH RESEARCH&WE FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/09/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).13411/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 25th day of September, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner was engaged as Cleaner in the Medical College Hospital, Kozhikode, by the 2nd respondent for intermittent periods. She had approached this Court at a point of time when her engagement was not continued. It seems that in the meanwhile, an allegation was also raised as regards the conduct of the petitioner when she was functioning as a Cleaner for allegedly having demanded bribe from a patient who came to the hospital. Pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court, in W.P.(C). 24230/2008, the petitioner was engaged as a Cleaner for 179 days as evidenced by Ext.P4. The said period also ended on 10.4.2009. She has not been engaged thereafter. Hence the writ petition. 2. A detailed counter affidavit has been filed by the 2nd respondent. Reference has been inter alia made to the complaint received against the petitioner involving an allegation of demanding and taking a bribe as well. It is W.P.(C).13411/09 2 upto the 2nd respondent to decide whether the services of the petitioner can be availed of, on a provisional basis. 3. I have perused the averments in the writ petition, counter affidavit and the reply affidavit filed by the petitioner. I heard learned counsel on both sides. 4. If the petitioner files a representation before the 2nd respondent, both expressing her willingness to be engaged as Cleaner and also requesting a posting in that regard, 2nd respondent shall consider and take a decision thereon as per administrative exigencies and the requirements found in the hospital. Writ petition is disposed of as above. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs