IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17898 of 2010 SHYAM SUNDAR YADAV SON OF LATE JHAKKAR YADAV R/O VILL BARWA PARSAUNI P.S. INARWA ANCHAL MAINATAND, DIST. WEST CHAMPARAN. --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR, WEST CHAMPARAN, BETTIAH 3. THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, WEST CHAMPARAN, BETTIAH 4. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS, NARKATIAGANJ, WEST CHAMPARAN 5. THE ANCHAL ADHIKARI MAINATAND ANCHAL WEST CHAMPARAN 6. CHHOTELAL YADAV 7. SAHEB YADAV ( BOTH SONS OF LATE JHAKKAR YADAV, R/O VILL-BARWA, PARSAUNI, P.S. INARWA, ANCHAL MAINATAND, DIST WEST CHAMPARAN. --- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 03 18.03.2011 Heard counsel for the petitioner, respondent nos. 6 and 7, and the State. Petitioner is aggrieved by the appellate order dated 12.10.2007 passed in Jamabandi Correction case no. 30 of 2007-08 (Chhotelal Yadav vs. Saheb Yadav & Anr.) Annexure- 1, as also the revisional order dated 24.09.2010 passed in Mutation revision no. 192 of 2009-10 (Annexure-1/1). Petitioner and respondent nos. 6 and 7 are full brothers. There seems to be a dispute over partition of the family property/land. It appears from the revisional order 24.09.2010, that a suit being Title (Partition) suit no.87 of 2006 is pending between the parties. Learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner and respondent nos. 6 and 7 have also accepted about pendency of the suit between the parties. It further appears that in the revisional order, it has been observed that since there is already a 2 suit pending between the parties and as such no order is required to be passed. In other words, order relating to mutation passed in favour of respondent nos. 6 and 7 shall abide by the final result of the suit. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court while declining to interfere with the impugned order disposes of the present application observing that any finding on the issue of partition/title made in the impugned orders (Annexures 1 and 1/1) shall not prejudice the case of the parties in the pending suit. The impugned order shall abide by the final result of the Title suit which is said to be pending between the parties. Sym/ ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)