IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO: 10298 of 2005 Between: K. Damodar Reddy, S/o. Soma Reddy, R/o. Kukunurpally Village, Kondapak Mandal, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Union of India, Rep. by its Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Loknayak Bhavan,(Hyderabad FF Cell), New Delhi. 2. The Government of A.P., rep. by its Joint Secretary to Govt. Revenue (FF) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the Circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed therewith, the Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not re-considering the case of the petitioner for granting pension under Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, by taking into consideration, Lr.No.8-165/FF/II/A2/94-1 dated 8-1-1999 of the 2nd respondent as arbitrary, illegal, and for extraneous considerations and contrary to the Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, and to issue a consequential direction to the 1st respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for granting pension under Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension Scheme with effect from the date of his application forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. K.ANANDA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: MR. PONNAM ASHOK GOUD The Court made the following ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Deputy Secretary, Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Loknayak Bhavan,(Hyderabad FF Cell), New Delhi. 2. The Joint Secretary to Govt. Revenue (FF) Department The Government of A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 One CC to MR. K.ANANDA RAO Advocate [OPUC] 4 Two CCs to MR. PONNAM ASHOK GOUD(ASST SOLICITOR GEN), High Court Of A.P. Hyd. [OUT] 5. Two CD Copies. HIGH COURT CVR,J DATED: 24-11-2010 ORDER WP.NO: 10298 OF 2005 DISMISS HIGH COURT DATED: WP.NO: