Cr.MMO No.104 of 2007 28.5.2008. Present: Mr.N.K. Gupta, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.R.S. Jamalta, counsel for respondent No.1. The petitioner has filed the present petition against the order summoning him by the trial Court, vide impugned order, dated 4.12.2004, vide which the petitioner has been summoned under Section 494 read with Section 109 IPC. The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the marriage certificate to show that accused No.2 before the learned trial Court, who is alleged to be his daughter, is married to another person and not to accused No.1, the husband of respondent/complainant. This marriage certificate is required to be proved before the learned trial Court and only by considering this marriage certificate, this Court cannot hold that the present proceedings deserve to be quashed. The petitioner is required to take all such pleas before the learned trial Court and prove the marriage certificate, if he deems it necessary, during the trial of the case. No case is made out that the petitioner has been summoned without there being any prima facie case and no case is made out for quashing of the proceedings pending before the learned trial Court. In view of the above, there is no merit in the petition filed by the petitioner, which is dismissed accordingly. The parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court on the date fixed, i.e. 14.7.2008. May 28, 2008. (V.K. Ahuja), (TILAK) Judge.