WP(C) 4006/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE UB SAHA The instant application is filed by the petitioners, 3 in nos. namely, Baharul I slam, Samsul Bari Choudhury and Mohbubur Rahman for quashing the notification da ted 6th July, 2010 (Annexure-D to the writ petition) by which the Government of Assam, through its Principal Secretary, FCS and CA constituted certain committee s for various blocks including the blocks namely, Ramkrishna Nagar Dev. Block, P atherkandi Dev. Block and South Karimganj Dev. Block for selecting the beneficia ries under the scheme namely, Mukhya Mantrir Anna Surakhya Yojana, 2010 of Karim ganj District. Heard Mr. T Deuri, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mrs. VL Singh, learned GA for the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 who raised the question of maintainabi lity of the instant writ petition on the ground that the present petitioners hav e no right to continue as a member of the Selection Committee on the basis of th e notification dated 1st July, 2010 (Annexure-B to the writ petition) for select ing beneficiaries from the Ramkrishna Nagar Dev. Block, Patherkandi Dev. Block a nd South Karimganj Dev. Block respectively as it is the government who will deci de who should be in the committee for selecting the beneficiaries under the afor esaid scheme. In response to the aforesaid submission of the learned GA, Mr. Deuri would conte nd that the impugned notification has been issued, canceling the earlier notific ation by which the petitioners were nominated as Members of the Selection Commit tee, at the behest of various circle of people who are interested to oust the pr esent petitioners from the Selection Committee. In the view of the above submission of the learned counsel for the parties as we ll as considering the nature of the prayer made in the writ petition, this Court is of the considered opinion that the present petitioners have no right to cont inue as Members of the Selection Committee for selecting the beneficiaries for t he scheme namely, Mukhya Mantrir Anna Surakhya Yojana, 2010 for the Karimganj Di strict as the selection of the Members of the Selection Committee is with the St ate Government, if otherwise, not prohibited by any particular statute. When a c ommittee is constituted by the Government for implementing its scheme, it is alw ays open to the government to reconstitute the same considering various factors, if they so desire and particularly when the authority who constituted the selec tion committee receives certain allegations. This Court of also of the opinion that in the instant case the petitioners are n either elected nor selected by an elected body like the Panchayat, rather they a re nominated. Therefore, they have no right to continue as a Member of the Selec tion Committee and when they have no right they also cannot ask for canceling th e constitution of Selection Committee by the appropriate authority. This Court is of the further opinion that this is not a fit case where even a n otice has to be issued as the instant writ petition is devoid of merit. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed.