IN 1111 IIIOIICOL RI 01 KARNAI4KA (‘IRCL II RI NCII 41 I)II4RWAI) I)’IID tills liii 17’ I)AYOI 0C10h31R2011 BI’FORt Jill’ I 10N131 I’ MR.. Jt’S I Id ANANI) BYRARI I)I)Y CRIMINAl PE 1 IIION No.10922 2011 Ø1’IWI Lt%: Ganapati S o.Krishna Bhat Age: 603ears. 0cc: Rid. I eacher. R a I laladipura. At Pt: Sankolli. I q: 1Ionnaan. 1)1st: t ‘ttarakannada. PF [11 ION! R (13> Shri PatH M.1L Adocate.) ASI): Banurao S o.Shiiarao Bilaki Age; 70 >ears. 0cc: Rtd. teacher. R 0.2 Main. 2 Cross. Mruthunjaya ‘Jagar. Ranebennur. 1)1st: Haieri. ...RISPONDI Ni I his Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of’ the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking that the proceedings initiated b> the 11 AddI. .JMI C Court. Ranebennur. in P.C.No. 134 2010 (C .C .%o.663 2011) be quashed. b> aIlm ing thi’, petition. I his petition coming on for ddmlssion this da>. the Court made the fo11oi’ing. I ORI)ER 1 he learned counsel I or the petitioner contends that. Ii t lie im ined order the Court oI laeistrale has Pu led to take cogni/anee before issuing summons. ihis contention is ine\plicahle. Since liom a perusal of the impugned order. the Court has taken cogn iiance. I he mere lad that an express declaration that the (otirt is tak i ne lu/ande ma not he lbrthcoin me. I 1o e er, Irom the tenor ol the order it is apparent that the Court has taken coeni/ance. Iherelore. there is no ground made out Pr interfrence. I he petition is retected. JUDGE \lrk -