IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 7471 of 2010 & connected matters. Decided on: February 21, 2011. 1. CWP No. 7471 of 2010 Tilak Raj versus State of H.P. & anr. 2. CWP No. 8920 of 2010 . Pawna Kumar versus State of H.P. & anr. 3. CWP No. 8921 of 2010 Jagat Paul versus State of H.P. & anr. 4. CWP No 8922 of 2010 Sukh Dev Pathak versus State of H.P. & anr. 5. CWP No. 8933 of 2010 Pyare Lal versus State of H.P. & anr. 6. CWP No. 280 of 2011 Prithi Singh versus State of H.P. & anr. 7. CWP No. 282 of 2011 Kali Dass versus State of H.P. & anr. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioners: Ms. Archna Dutt, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim the benefit of ad hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and increments. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA 36 of 2010, Sita Ram versus State.. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondents concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from 2 the date of the production of copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition(s) and the copy of the judgment referred to above. 2. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. February 21, 2011. ( Justice Sanjay Karol ), (karan/vs) Judge.