: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.642 OF 1996 Mr. R. J. Sethna ... Petitioner Vs. Mr. Rajendra B. Mehta & Ors. ... Respondents Ms. Asha Bhambwani for the petitioner. Mr. R.A. Thorat for respondent 1. Mr. Prakash Shah i/b M/s. D.S.K. Legal for the applicant in Civil applications. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 3RD FEBRUARY, 2005. 3RD FEBRUARY, 2005. 3RD FEBRUARY, 2005. P.C.:- 1. The learned counsel for the parties state that the dispute involved in this application is amicably settled by the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the Constituted Attorney of the petitioner states that since respondents 2B and 2C are formal parties, their names may be deleted. Accordingly, the names of respondents 2B and 2C are allowed to be deleted. 2. Consent terms duly signed by the Constituted Attorney of the petitioner - Mr. Anand T. Advilkar, Constituted Attorney of respondent 1 - Mr. Asht R. Mehta and the Company Secretary of respondent 3 - Dinesh Shah and also signed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the : 2 : learned counsel for respondent 1 and the learned counsel for respondent 3 are taken on record and marked ‘X’. 3. Order in terms of the consent the terms. Civil Revision Application is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. 4. Constituted Attorney of the petitioner - Mr. Anand T. Advilkar, Constituted Attorney of respondent 1 - Mr. Asht R. Mehta and the Company Secretary of respondent 3 Dinesh Shah are present in the court. 5. By consent of the parties, all the connected civil applications are allowed and disposed of as such. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)