1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 7274/2010 Javed Kureshi Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 11.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Sudhir Jain -for the petitioner Mr Laxman Meena - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has not been named by the Conductor yet he is being apprehended for arrest. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be granted benefit of anticipatory bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. He submits that petitioner is also involved in the occurrence as against Babu (petitioner's nickname) allegations exist in the FIR. Hence, he may not be granted bail under section 438 CrPC. 2 After taking into consideration rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect the outcome of the trial, but looking to the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, bail application is dismissed. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma