IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 9042 of 2008. Decided on 8th December, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Rakesh Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. R.P. Singh & Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate Generals. Respondent No. 4 is exparte. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner has already made a representation for the redressal of his grievance on 16th July, 1998. Thereafter, the Director of Education, H.P. has also issued directions to the District Education Officer, District Mandi to look into the representation made by the petitioner on 19th January, 2001. 2. Mr. G.R. Palsra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that till date the District Education Officer, District Mandi has not passed any order despite the directions issued by the Director of Education. 3. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Education Officer, Mandi to decide the representation made by the petitioner on 16th July, 1998 in view of Annexure P-C, dated 19th January, 2001 by a speaking order, 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 08, 2010. (bhupender) - 3 - `