MCC No. 417 of 2010 CLMA No. 4254 of 2010 In CLCON No. 126 of 2004 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Anoop Verma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. C.D. Bahuguna, for the applicants. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. B.D. Kandpal, Advocate for respondent No.3. Delay condonation application is allowed. Delay in filing restoration application is condoned. The case was dismissed for want of prosecution on 26/06/2008. Restoration application has been filed by the applicants. Cause shown is sufficient. The restoration application is allowed. The order dated 26/06/2008 is recalled and the petition is restored to its original number. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Pursuant to the direction of the writ court dated 10/11/2003 as modified by the order of the writ court dated 20th November, 2003, the respondents have considered the representation of the applicants and by an order dated 7th September, 2007, found that the applicants could not be regularized. In view of the aforesaid, substantive compliance of the order of the writ court has been made by the opposite parties. Notices are discharged and the contempt application is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 29.06.2010 Shiv