IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23946 of 2010 RAMCHANDRA SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the owner of the Saw Mill is apprehending his arrest in a police case registered under Sections 353, 337, 352, 504/34 of the I.P.C. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the same informant lodged the case against the petitioner being Forest Case No. 04 of 2010 on 26.03.2010 for running Saw Mill without license. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that when the petitioner was granted bail in the earlier case, the present case has been lodged by the same informant in which no injury has been caused to any one. Considering the nature of allegation and the fact that the earlier case has been lodged by the same informant in which the petitioner was granted bail then the present case has been lodged by the same informant, let the petitioner, Ramchandra Sharma be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender 2 before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 33 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Sherghatti at Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)