IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2010 / 11TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 37859 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- S.SREEJA, W/O.RAJAGOPALAN.K., H.S.A.(MALAYALAM), NAROKAVU HIGH SCHOOL, NAROKAVU P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.DEVIDAS.U.K RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT (ANNEXE), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE MANAGER, NAROKAVU HIGH SCHOOL, NAROKAVU P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY G.P. SRI. P.NANDAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= W.P.(C) No. 37859 of 2009 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= Dated this the 1st day of January, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioner is working as H.S.A. (Malayalam) in the 3rd respondent school from 9-1-2007 in a leave vacancy. The 3rd respondent Manager of the school had filed necessary proceedings for approval of the appointment from 9-1-2007, but the concerned District Educational Officer rejected the same, which hence was subjected to challenge by the 3rd respondent, by filing an appeal before the Deputy Director of Education, Malappuram, though did not turn to be fruitful. Met with the said circumstances, the 3rd respondent preferred a revision petition before the 2nd respondent and after considering the facts and figures, the revision petition was allowed in part, as per Ext.P1 order, whereby the appointment of the petitioner was approved with effect from 2-6-2008 to 13-3-2012. Aggrieved by the said order, to the extent approval has been rejected with effect from 9-1-2007, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 revision petition before the 1st respondent. It is stated that the revision petition is numbered as file 6263/E1/09/G.Edn. The prayer is only to direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 within a reasonable time. W.P.(C) No. 37859/09 2 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents as well. 3. After considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the 1st respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 revision petition, in accordance with law, of course after giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. mn