IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 6257 of 2011 with CWP Nos.6258, 6259 and 6260 of 2011. Decided on: 04.08.2011. _____________________________________________________ 1. CWP No.6257 of 2011. Vinod Kumar Sharma. Versus State of H.P. and Others. 2. CWP No.6258 of 2011. Prem Swaroop Versus State of H.P. and Others. 3. CWP No.6259 of 2011. Khem Chand. Versus State of H.P. and Others. 4. CWP No.6260 of 2011. Vijay Kumar. Versus State of H.P. and Others. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. For the petitioner : Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): The petitioners are teachers appointed on PTA basis. They are aggrieved since the private respondents have been appointed in their place on regular basis. According to the petitioners, the private respondents can be accommodated without - 2 - any disturbance to them, in the nearby schools, where there are vacancies. The petitioners may obtain the willingness of the private respondents and produce the same before the second respondent, in which case, the second respondent will take steps to accommodate the private respondents in the vacancies as pointed out by the petitioners, if available and in the resultant vacancies in case the petitioners are otherwise eligible and entitled, they may be engaged as PTA teachers, till they are replaced by the regular recruitees. The needful be done in three weeks. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. August 04, 2011. (sck/hl).