FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3202 OF 200 PETITION NO. 3202 OF 200 PETITION NO. 3202 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Y.S.Jahagirdar sr.Adv. with S.S.Patwardhan & P.C.Chavan for petitioner. Shri C.R.Sonawane AGP for Respdts. 1/2. Shri Amit Borkar for Respdt.3/4. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.G.PALSHIKAR & V.M.KANADE, V.M.KANADE, V.M.KANADE, JJ. JJ. JJ. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 30TH JUNE,2006 30TH JUNE,2006 30TH JUNE,2006. P.C. 1. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Caste Scrutiny Committee basically on the ground that some of the documents having parental value have been completely ignored by the committee. We have considered the submission, the impugned order and the documents on which reliance is placed by the committee. The Caste Scrutiny Committee is an independent tribunal to decide the validity of a caste certificate, who has gone into the validity of the caste certificate by exmaining the documents which were used for obtaining the caste certificate by the petitioner. From the impugned order it cannot be said that it is based on no evidence. There is cogent evidence available to support the findings given by the committee. In such circumstances, it is not necessary to interfere with the findings given by the tribunal. Hence petition dismissed. However the interim order granted earlier will continue for a period of two weeks from today. ...