1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2365 OF 2005 Laxmanrao Vanaprati ... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2407 OF 2005 Prema Laxmanrao Vanaprati ... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. A.C. Singh with Mr. D.R. Shah for Petitioner. Mr. A. Sayyad, A.G.P. for Respondents. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: OCTOBER 07, 2006 DATED: OCTOBER 07, 2006 DATED: OCTOBER 07, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . We have considered the order dated 19.3.2005. The authority after considering the evidence on record has come to the conclusion that the suit structure is only one structure and not two separate premises premises and eligible for only one alternate pitch of size 10 feet x 15 feet. It is purely a finding of fact. Nothing has been pointed out to us to show that the said finding is perverse or contrary to the record. In the light of that no interference is called for. Petition dismissed. All interim orders stands vacated. 2 (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)