-UTP^ <S3 2-S>J2- Oo^7 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. (Sl PR No. 5500/2007 PETITIONER RESPONDEMTS 2 3. 5. Muktavaa Das Bhard, aged about 39 years, S/o Budliaru Ram. Bhard, Shikhsa Kanni Class-III, R/o ViUage Arasnara, Durg (C.G.) Versus State ofChhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Paachayat aad Rural Developiuent Department D.K. Bhawau, Raipur (C.G.) District Panchayat, Through Chief Executi.ve Officer Distt. Paachayat Durg, District Durg (C.G.) Distt. Education Officer, District Durg (C.G.) Jaapad Pauchayat Durg Througli C.F.0. Janpad Paachayat Dui^, Distnct Dm^ (C.G.) Block Education Of&cer, Block Durg, District Durg (C.G.) •^- 6^»y WRIT PBTITIOILUNDBR ARTICLE 2260FTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 . Appearaace: Shri D.R. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Shri Anup Majuindar, Counsel for fhe petitioner, Shri Ajay Ehnvedi, Panel Lawyer for theState. ORAL ORDBR (19.09.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J Heard. Learaed counsel for fhe petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition on the ground that a representatioa has been filed befoie fhe concemed authorily. The prayer is allowed. The petition is dismissed, as withdrawn. Sdl- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge