‘ua-.. —_———_——.— mp .No. £16i OF 201. m THE gggxj‘ggggg OF CHHzmT/Qggga AT BILAgggg,_ u———.—...— 1. Amriksingh, ‘ S/Ot éhri Gulzar Sinqhg aged about ye ars ,, L. berg x , K , PET IT IONERS 2. Akbal Singh, 8/0. Gulzar §-ingh, aged about years, Both R/o. Geedam Road. Jagaalpur, Distt. Basrar. 3. Nemiehaxm Jain. s/o Roopchana Jain,Geedam District Dantewada “4' , iabout 1 Mist ate o£wchhattisgarh 1 through z The secretary; ForESt Department . Mantralaya. Raipur(c .G . RESPONDENTS 2. The Adal. chief ConserVator Forest, (Production) Bhopal. se The ConserVator of Forest J aga'alpur circle ’ Jagdalpur(c .G.) 4° The D.F§0, Bijapur, Distt. Dantewadar (C.G.) f, 2f, WRIT PETETxoN UNDER- ARTECLE 226 s: 227 OF ng "CONST lTUTmN OF mum. Det ails of petition / Erticulars OE petitioneg : As per cause tiiile. contd..‘2¢. 0 \ : 1 ‘ XI—HC-22 wl‘mww 02.07.2002 . Shri Prafulla Bharat,‘ leanled cOunsel for the petitioner. ‘ smi Sanjay K. Agn’awal, leamed Dy.Advocate-Genera1 for the sgte. Having heard learned counsel, the Court is not mclined to» its opinion, the rehedy lies before a ' ehtertain this Writ Pe1ition, as in common law forum. The petitioger hah entered? i4l‘to a conuacewith the D.F.0. Bijapur l for hansportaiion of Bamboo. Ad 'ttedly, the payment was to be made»¢’ l on the basis of per metric tones of boo transported. According to the petiiioner, since the cimumferen of Bamboo to be hanspormd was loss of transportation charges for carriage ofbaniboo, due to which e has sustained huge loss. The period 0f contxact is ov, and in substance, the clm'm of the petin’oner is for damages su§erexi by him. Themfom, as obselved, the i appropriate mmedy for the petitioner is to appmach a common law forum or to go for-(Arbitrat'on if the contract so provides. 2 With this observation, the petmon stands disposed of. I increased, it resulted in causin Sdl- P.C-Naik Judge / % s/ i , WW Wss‘r‘sa