IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 23RD DECEMBER 2010 / 2ND POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 38482 of 2010(I) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.V.SIVADASAN, POOREZHATHI, KODAMTHURUTHU, CHERTHALA. BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.-695001 2. THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, MUTHIATHODE.P.O., CHERTHALA, PIN-688 533. 3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R.), TALUK OFFICE, CHERTHALA.P.O.-685533 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KODAMTHURUTHU, KODAMTHURUTHU.P.O., CHERTHALA.-685533 ADV. SRI.SATHISH NINAN FOR R1,2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 38482 of 2010 I ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner had availed a loan from the second respondent in the year 2004 for a diary unit. Default was committed and it was while so, that Ext.P1 Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Release Scheme, 2008 was introduced. Petitioner claimed the benefit of the Scheme and by Ext.P2 dated 10-09-2008, partial waiver was allowed. Subsequently, the Bank got Revenue Recovery proceedings initiated for realising its dues and Ext.P3 notice was issued on 15-03- 2009. Subsequently, petitioner submitted Ext.P4 representation dated 03-06-2010 claiming that under Ext.P1 Scheme, he was entitled to get total waiver of his liability and there was no response. Now, he has been issued Ext.P5 from the Village Officer, requiring him to discharge the liability due to the Bank. It is at this stage, this writ petition is filed, challenging Exts.P2, P3 and P5. W.P.(C) No.38482/10 : 2 : 2. From the facts noticed above, it cannot be seen that the cause of action which made the petitioner to file this writ petition is his claim for waiver of his liability, which stands rejected by Ext.P2 dated 10-09-2008. Therefore, if at all petitioner was aggrieved, on receipt of Ext.P2, he should have approached this Court, which was not done. If that be so, the writ petition filed at this distance of time is highly belated and, therefore, I am not inclined to entertain the same. Writ petition fails and it is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks