G‘LE BEN IN THE HIGH COURT OF CI-E-IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR. Contempt Petition No. LS} /2005 M.H.Wase s/o M.M.Wase, aged about 59 years, Lecturer, DIET, Pendra, District Bilaspur, C.G. u.a f ‘iyETrrIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1.Alck shukla. Secretary u Schoo Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. 2 . G. S. Dhananjay, Director . Lok shikshan Sanchalanalaya, Chhattisgarh , Raiur . 3.Yogesh Shukla, District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, C.G. CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF‘. THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. i ( ; x ”Jwr , l p / ég HIGH CGURT OF JUD!CATURE AT ABILSPUR ; CHHATTISHGARH SWGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHRI i-LLDATTU, Cd. Cantempt Petiéion Ne. 55 9f 2005 1 V ¥ This Court by its order dated 27.04.2004 had disposed of W.P. No. 1095 of 2004 and directed the petitioner to make appropriate representation to the respondents and further directed the respondents to consider and decide the representation in accordance with law as eariy as possible, preferably within two'months from the date of receipt of the representation, by passing a reasoned order. Aiieging that the respondents have not considered the representation of the petitioner and have not passed reasoned order, the petitioner is before me in this petition tiled under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Court Act 1971 read with Articie 215 of the Constitution of india, inter aiia, seeking the relief of initiating contempt proceedings against the respondents and punish them for wiiifut and deliberate disobediense of the orders and directions issued by this Court. / I PETiTlQNER: NLH. Was‘e 1 V ¥ Vs‘ RESPGNDENTS: Aiok Shukia 8: another. Present : , Shri A.K. Prasad, counsel for the petitioner. Shri V.R. Tiwari, counsel for respondent No. ORAL ORDER (Passed __{__._ on 1s March, 2007) The respondents are served and they have entered their appearance through learned counseL The contesting respondent has filed counter affidavit before this court stating that the respondents have constdered the representation of the petitioner and passed appropriate orders. Since the respondents have complied with the orders and directions issued by this Court, the question of initiating contempt proceedings does not arise. Therefore, the petition is rejected. However, itberty is given to the petitioner to question the correctness or otherwise of the order passed by the respondents on the representation fiied by the petitioner before the appropriate forum. Ordered accordingly.