1 Ash IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3320 OF 2009 Sou. Alpana Appasaheb Pawar. .. Petitioner Vs Shri Vijay Yallappa Shinde & Anr. .. Respondents -- Shri Ashutosh M. Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Shri Umesh R. Mankapure for the Respondents. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 29TH APRIL 2010 P.C: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner - 1st Defendant. By the order impugned, the application made by the Respondents – Plaintiffs for amendment of the plaint has been allowed. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submitted that the application for amendment is not simply under Rule 17 of Order VI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 but it is an application for impleading the parties. He, therefore, submitted that such amendment could not have been permitted at this stage. 2. Perusal of the application at Exhibit – 93 shows that there is 2 no prayer made for adding parties. The Respondents want to add an averment at the end of Paragraph 2 of the Plaint stating that the heirs of Smt. Nankibai Dhanrajmal Pujari have appointed the 2nd Defendant as their Constituted Attorney. The other amendment sought is for deletion of the words “15 persons” by substituting the same by the words “23 persons”. 3. No interference is called for in writ jurisdiction with the order impugned by which the amendment has been allowed. If the additional written statement is not filed till today, the same be filed within four weeks from the date on which the writ of this Court is received by the Trial Court. (A.S.OKA, J)