IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 431 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 555 OF 2007 SHRI. PRAKASH S. RAIKAR AND 6 ORS., ... Applicants Versus GOA SHIPYARD LIMITED AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. V. A. Lawande, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Sudesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for the respondent no.1. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 6th July, 2009 P.C. The petitioners are already in employment and as such we do not find any urgency in the matter. However, it is informed that some colleagues of the petitioner had raised industrial dispute and they have been given some pay revision by the Industrial Court which has been challenged before the Single Judge of this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner has made attempts to distinguish the case of the petitioner from those claimants. Without going into the merits of the controversy, we permit the petitioner to move appropriate application without prejudice to the rights in this petition, if they are willing to have the benefits as conferred by the Industrial Court. If such application is moved, the respondent has a right to oppose the same. Application is accordingly disposed of. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. lh/.