wwwwmwi wmww‘wwmwwu E9 wwwwywmwgg WW u mw% QWMMww@w.wwmwz g? ww§wwq www; Mmw harwZmM‘Mm ll‘iln \ / f, // K // mgaawags Mmwkhwwmw “WWW m%%% Qmgw wmwmZm§nw®ow mmmbmwww,“ mm wwmam awawwn wwwmaw X€m+mm v E mmw§aw mam§wm§u Hawhmm” mm xmmwmw Mmwwmw QWJM tpgmawgg wwqhzyaw LE. 3 w \‘ xr‘ x. h/mwwmEmm J. x . $m§ u mqmaa Eu Gwwmwmmmimnwr mgmmmwww Uwaammwww agom gwyi§qw Wu. wwm Wwmwnwwwmv wawg AUQQ A? Wgaggw Qgmdr‘mw Qwmwmnm ww.Qwmwmmmmmmg Wmwmg a§w QmMmnM mQgwmmowQWWDmwgamma” 1W$dmBam§om AG. Mm. v x M y I‘EJ EwwwmQ . M2®ww m \ \ wmwn. mmg~ Zmbgwwo maO gw @ HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAT’I‘ISGARH: BILA3PUR single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. No. .832 of 2005 Petitioner : Ram Sahay Namdeo Versus Respondent : State of Chhattisgarh 8r. others Shri Suni] Sahu, A('ivncafe fm‘ the Fetih'oner. and 3. Shri Satish Gupfa, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the resgmndents No. 1 Shri Raghvemdm Pradhan’ Advocate for the mspondent No.2. ORDER. (6th Seytember, 2006) 1. The petitinner has filed this petition seeking a direction against the responfiant No.2 to make outstanding amount of Rs. 50,000]- towalds 'GVPF. with interest at the rate of 180A). ? The resliondenf No.2 has filed its reply. In the reply if has heen made dear that the petitioner has Withdrawn amounts severe] times and after having reconciled an amount of Rs. 26,205l- towards G.P,F‘. amount up to the ‘date of retiiement i.e. 30.1 1.2001 is moverable from the petitioner with penal interest til] its recovery. 3. Re that as it may, in View of the disputeri questions of facts the petitioner is directed to contact the respondent N02 on a given date and the respondent No.2 in turn is directed to reconcile the account in presence of the petitioner and pass apnropriate order, in accordance with law. 4. With the above ohservations, this petition stands disposed of. No _\ *‘v sw— ESatish K. Agm'hotri? Judge order as to costs. Thakur _\5