IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI ANIL R. DAVE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.1281 of 2009 Between: V.C. Thomas and another. ...Appellants And Union of India, Represented by Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi and others. ...Respondents Counsel for the appellants : Sri A. Ramalingeswara Rao Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2 : None Counsel for respondent Nos.3 to 5 : Asst. Govt. Pleader for Home Counsel for respondent No.6 : None The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT: (per Sri Anil R. Dave, C.J.) 1) This appeal is filed against an order passed in Writ Petition No.19480 of 2007, dated 7th August, 2009. 2) The appellants – original petitioners are aggrieved at the way in which investigation in the case of death of Ms. Sophy Thomas had taken place. 3) After hearing the concerned Advocates, the learned Single Judge came to the conclusion that due efforts were made by the investigating agency and the petition had been finally disposed of. 4) It is pertinent to note that the appellants herein, who are the parents of the deceased, are not the original informants and that the FIR was filed by a room-mate and on that report investigation had been commenced. 5) It is also pertinent to note that though the case had been filed as “un-detectable”, in pursuance of an interim order passed by this Court, further investigation has been started by reopening the case and at present, the investigating agency is investigating it further. 6) At the time of hearing of this appeal, the learned Advocate appearing for the appellants, after perusal of the case diary, has submitted that he would like to make some suggestions to the investigating officer. 7) Looking to the peculiar facts of the case, we are sure that if any suggestion is made by the learned Advocate appearing for the appellants to the investigating officer, he shall consider the same. 8) The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home has assured this Court that due efforts shall be made by the investigating officer to make all efforts to see that the person who has committed the offence could be detected. 9) If by chance, it is not possible to the investigating agency to come to any further conclusion and if final report is submitted to the learned Magistrate, it would be open to the appellants to file their objections. 10) With the above observations, the appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs. ANIL R. DAVE, C.J. 10th November, 2009 C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J. ARS