t,- rs .'.EBB HI&H GOVSZ os- JOBICASUBB AS BISASPOasC.S.. MISGBI,I«AHB©XJSAriBAE HO .''-/ &3 0-S 2003 BISGBIiIiASEG'US ATaeSAIi UHDBB SEeaiGB 5*0., •» ' ' • •' ._ ._-._._.__.-. ___ '.. . _ ..__. VO-BSSSSiGOSSSaSSSJSa SB'£y923 eXIan't Hoa-Atpplioan.-t; 5 iiSlW»8 ^jD.i'bei India Ins-aranee Company Iitd, ;& Semplex,jeo'we2' House, Q-»S»BDad,.EowerHou.se, Bhilai, Bistrie-t Ihirg Vs, ^ >3^ ^y.. <^%^/^ \y^^..-'" .^y' Henau^-' Euaar Bimal]i:ar»S/o» Jaga'tram Hiiiaalkar^ - Bombay Harke*,,; Ealpur B.egMa.ilawaB Sabu S/o a»E«Sahu.} &/o S/252, 2eli.para,aaipu3' .EToB-Aipplioaats 1-&2 1'. . ~ ! ; .y^ Vijey Euaar Sabu S/o Eala Sam Sahu @ Babulal Sabn.»aged25years, Oocupa'tioia.—Briver, B/o <Bhllai, Dis-fcript Burg — Al>^"~fc Glaxa ia appeal Sor oaaoella'tion of Award, valued a-t to.3,12,350/- Slxxed Coayt fe e, a£f±x.e&Hs.15/ir (Hote; She awaraed aBioun't has been - deposA-tea and,»'fche eerta.fiqa'te 'o -fe?~*l-*»<Jt-J i& thia regard^will tic filei sb&sSA^% ~~~ :., ^r3"T'S~ i8=sisiss,L.issS^£:f^£if jfl" „ . 's" -•MLJDt-hJTO XI-HC-78 *ii*i«ia?Ti^ gwIT«i<iirt*i,t»-a1<«<is,Rrtitiyx .'h'?....^.;..1^.0:. ^ gn^sT q3<R (lcifg^5) aii^?T9?rR't aanan^raimm subbu ^RITW^lfStT3II^?I DIVISION BENCH HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV 0(JPTA, GJ < HON'BLE SHRI RMilGNATh CHANWIAKAR. J. 26.02.2010. Shri Sanjay S. Agrawa)! Shri Puntt Ruparel, leajrned counsel for respmident HoS.. approprierte appllcation for brinlng the legal representall Nirmalkar,the appeal ftsetf totheBench. Sd/- Chief Justice <Dl<lI»<hliiinTtfls'd tfuitsit ^ 3lRl*l SD^ST , l^imed counsel forthe appetent. Shri Sanjay S. AgrEM|/al, leamed coureel fer the appellant prays for and is granted f^irther time of so< weete for flling an brhTging ttre tegal rqiFe»ntati»esof respondent No.1 Hemant Kutnar Nirmalkaron recerd. On the appetlanfs fail^re to file an appropriate application for l|/es of respondent No.1 HemartKumar ^hall stand dismfesed wittiout reference Sd/- R.N.Chandrakar Judge