IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CRMPM No.452 of 2007 Decided on: July 5, 2007 State of H.P. ......Petitioner. VERSUS Dinesh Kumar ......Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Chaudhary, Additional Advocate General. For the Respondent : Nemo. ___________________________________________________________ Surjit Singh, Judge (Oral) Respondent was sent up for trial for using unfair means at an examination held by the Board of School Education. According to the prosecution allegation, he was spotted while doing copying and when it was sought to seize his answer-book, he allegedly ran away with that answer-book. 2. Prosecution examined four witnesses, who were supervising the examination. None of them stated that the respondent was found copying the answers to the questions. Therefore, no fault can be found with the order of acquittal passed by the trial Court. Hence, leave to appeal is declined. Application is dismissed. July 5, 2007(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J. Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?