IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1374 of 2010 ANIL KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.4.2010 Heard Mr. Bashishtha Narayan Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Dinesh Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 309 of 2009 dated 14.12.2009 registered under sections 420, 467, 468, 272, 273 of the Indian penal Code and 47 (a) Excise Act. According to the prosecution case though petitioner is a licensee but huge quantity of spurious and poisonous country made liquor details of which have been given in the FIR as also in the seizure list, have been seized from the go-down as also from the Ist floor of the residential house of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that go-down in question from where seizures have been made do not belong to the petitioner. Even the residential building, alleged to be in possession of the petitioner, does not belong to him and it belong to some another Anil Kumar. Taking into consideration the recovery of huge quantity of spurious and poisonous country made liquor from the go-down and residential building allegedly belonging to the petitioner, this court is not inclined to accede to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail. The prayer is rejected. The petitioner must surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If such a petition is filed, then the same may be disposed of on its own merit - 2 - without being prejudiced by the present order. (Birendra Prasad Vedrma, J) M.Rahman