IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 24TH AUGUST 2009 / 2ND BHADRA 1931 RP.No. 739 of 2009 -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.24619/2008 Dated 09/07/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: --------------------------------------------------- SMT.SANKARI AMMA, W/O.LATE RAGHAVAN PILLAI, EXGS-148592 F, RESIDING AT PAYICHATHU KIZHKATHIL HOUSE, THAMALLACKAL PO, ALAPPUZHA DIST. BY ADV. SRI.R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: --------------------------------------------- 1. THE UNION OF INDIA REP.BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ROAD AND TRANSPORT AND HIGH WAYS, BRDB,B WING 4TH FLOOR, KASHMIR HOUSE, DHQ PO, NEW DELHI-110011. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, BORDER ROADS, SEEMA SADAK BHAWAN RING ROAD, DELHI CANTT, NEW DELHI-110010. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER PROJECT, BEACON, C/O.56APO 4. THE COMMANDER COMMANDING, HQ 760 BRTF C/O.56 APO, 5. THE OFFICER COMMANDING CARE 53 RCC (GREF) (354 ROAD, MAINT PLATOON(GREF) CARE C/O.56 APO) 6. THE CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS (PENSIONS) ALLAHABAD 7. THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, HARIPAD, ALAPPUZHA DIST. BY P.R.LESLIE STEPHEN, C.G.C. R7 BY ADV.SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN, S.C. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: app/- P.N. RAVINDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P. No.739 of 2009. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 24th day of August, 2009 J U D G M E N T Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Central Government Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. In the light of the fact that recipients of compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act,1923 are not entitled to payment of liberalised family pension except in cases when the liberalised family pension is higher than the benefits admissible under the Workmen's Compensation Act, I am of the opinion that petitioner cannot simultaneously claim payment of compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act together with interest thereon and liberalised family pension. I therefore find no grounds to entertain this review petition. The review petition is accordingly dismissed. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. app/-