HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLIATION NO. 2862 OF 2008 IN REVIEW PETITION st NO. 26362 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION st NO. 26362 OF 2008 REVIEW PETITION st NO. 26362 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2801 of 2007 Rajesh S. Patil & Others. ..Petitioners. Versus. S. M. Kambale & Others. ..Respondents. --- Mr. P. K. Dhakepalkar, Sr.counsel with Mr. P. P. Kulkarni for applicant. Mr. C. D. Mehta i/b M/s. Dhruv Liladhar & Co., for respondent nos. 1, 2, 3 & 5. Mr. V. P. Malavankar, AGP for respondent no. 4 & 9. Mr. A. M. Kulkarni for respondent no.8 CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & D.G.KARNIK, JJ. D.G.KARNIK, JJ. D.G.KARNIK, JJ. DATE: February 13, 2009. DATE: February 13, 2009. DATE: February 13, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Perused the order passed by the Hon’ble the Supreme Court in S.L.P. No. 22659 of 2007. In paragraph no.2 of the said order the Apex Court has observed thus: "It is also made clear that the Society and the original writ petitioners would not raise the plea of locus and limitation in such Review petition to be filed." 2. In view of these observations, we are satisfied that the delay in the matter needs to be condoned. Accordingly the delay is condoned and civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Office is directed to number the review petition. (D.G.KARNIK, J.) (D.G.KARNIK, J.) (D.G.KARNIK, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)