: 1 : FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.507 OF 2008 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.566 OF 2006 IN L.C.SUIT NO.2969 OF 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s . orders or directions and . Registrar’s orders . -------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Anil Singh i/b Mr.D.R. Shah for the Applicant. Ms.Sudha Sreedharan for Respondent No.1. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 6TH OCTOBER, 2008. P.C. : 1. Prima-facie, it does appear that the notice put up by the Appellant pursuant to the liberty granted in paragraph 4 of the order dated 16.2.2008 is contrary to the order, as far as the second part thereof is concerned. 2. Paragraph 4 of the order reads thus :- : 2 : "Both the parties shall be at liberty to put up notice board on the Nalla clearly indicating that the ownership of the land of the Nalla is in dispute in Suit No.2969 of 2004 pending before the City Civil Court, Mumbai." 3. The second part of the impugned notice reads thus :- "By order of the Hon’ble High Court at Bombay in A.O. No.566 of 2006 Laxmi Industrial Estate Builders & Developers has been directed to deposit in the Hon’ble City Civil Court at Bombay an amount of Rs.50.00 lakhs pending the hearing and final disposal of above suit." 4. An application for speaking to the minutes of the said order was taken out by the Appellant. No orders were passed thereon. : 3 : 5. The Appellant is at liberty to rectify the notice as per this order within six weeks from today. Failing the same, the Respondent is at liberty to file an appropriate application for the alleged violation of the order. In the present Civil Application, no orders can be passed regarding compliance with the order dated 16.2.2008. . The Civil Application is accordingly disposed of.