SSK/928 1 Wpl. 587.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.587 OF 2011 Mrs. Krishna Satish Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mrs. Krishna Satish Singh, petitioner in person. Ms. A. N. Helekar, AGP for respondent no.1. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & RANJIT MORE, JJ. DATED : 21st JUNE, 2011. P.C.: Prayer (b) of the petition is as under : “(b) A writ of mandamus or certiorari or other appropriate order and direction be issued for to re-open/re-store case and within three weeks dispose of matter as per direction of theorder dated 20/09/2010 passed by Hon’ble High Court and obey Hon’ble High Court’s order and only President and General Secretary of said Association, Federation of Western India Cine Employee will strictly appear before the Labour Commissioner Office/Trade Union with heavy cost and no unauthorized person who is not member shall appear and report the findings within time to Hon’ble Court.” SSK/928 2 Wpl. 587.11 2. Affidavit has been filed by Shri Rajesh Bhaosing Ade, Deputy Registrar of Trade Union. Paragraph 8 thereof reads as under: “8. I say that the petitioner has filed various litigations and keeps on approaching and writing letters to this office. I say that the petitioner was informed by the letter dated 20-12-2010 that the order dt. 20-09-2010 was already complied with and it will not be proper to take any action pursuant to the letter dt. 15.11.2010. I say that the Petitioner again made a request by her letter dt. 6-5-2011 referring to her application dt. 15-11-2010 making a grievance about unqualified Committee of Respondent No. 3. I say that in view to give fullest opportunity to Petitioner, this Office decided to once again hold hearing in respect of grievances of Petitioner. I say that the hearing was according fixed on 15-6-2010. I say that notice was sent to the petitioner at her address by Regd. Post A/D on 13-6-2011 for the hearing of 15-6-2011 and she was also informed on her cell phone. I say that the Petitioner always insists that she should be intimated about dates only on her cell phone. I say that the letter sent by Regd. Post A/D. was returned by the Postal department on 17-6-2011 with the remarks “Left”. I crave leave of this Hon’ble Court to refer to reply upon the said unserved letter and remark as and when necessary. I further say that submit that the petitioner remained present for hearing on 15-6-2011 and now the matter has been adjourned to 1-7-2011 for hearing with the direction to respondent no.3 to produce membership register.” SSK/928 3 Wpl. 587.11 3. In view of the above averment, in our opinion, the petitioner’s grievance is redressed. The case is re-opened and the hearing is to take place on 1st July, 2011. In the circumstances, without going into the rival contentions, we dispose of the petition by passing the following order: 1. The petitioner shall remain present before the Deputy Registrar, Trade Union on 1st July, 2011 and the Deputy Registrar, Trade Union shall dispose of the matter expeditiously, and in any case, within a period of four weeks from 1st July, 2011. 4. The petition is disposed of in the aforestated terms. (RANJIT MORE, J.) (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)