IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46431 of 2008 DHARMDEO SAHANI, son of Bharat Sahani, Resident of village Sundrapur Malahitola, P.S. Kesariya, District East Champaran ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ….Opposite party ----------- For the Petitioner :Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Advocate For the State :Mr. R.B. Roy Raman, A.P.P. 02/ 15.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner was made accused in a case, which was initially registered for the offence under Sections 365, 363 of the Indian Penal Code, but when ransom call was received, then even Section 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code was added. Petitioner has been implicated in this case at the instance of Dinesh Rai, who was arrested with mobile, wherefrom ransom call was made. Later, Dinesh Rai even implicated petitioner in his inculpatory statement. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to admit the petitioner to the privilege of bail. This application is, accordingly, rejected. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)