IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 24TH MAY 2011 / 3RD JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 13729 of 2011(M) ----------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- DINESAN, S/O ACHUTHAN, MANCHERY VEEDU, NANNAMMUKKU P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.BINDU GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM-676001. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THIROOR, MALAPPURAM-676101. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHANGARAMKULAM POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676102. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J -------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.13729 OF 2011 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of May 2011 JUDGMENT The vehicle bearing No.KL 08 N 2849 belonging to the petitioner was seized on 23-11-2010 by the 3rd respondent under the relevant provisions of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, which culminated in Ext.P1 order dated 22-02-2011 passed by the 2nd respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite filing the statutory Revision Petition as borne by Ext.P2 before the 1st respondent, the same is still to be considered and disposed of, which hence is sought to be interfered by filing this Writ Petition. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits on instruction that, the idea of the petitioner is wrong and misconceived and that the Revision Petition was heard and final orders were passed on 04- 05-2011 and that the outcome has already been communicated to the petitioner by the learned counsel appearing for the concerned authority. 3. In the light of the above submissions, nothing further remains to be considered in the Writ Petition and the same is closed accordingly. vdv P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE