IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. ORDER S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1864/2008 Smt. Shankuntla Sharma & Anr. Vs. Smt. Lalita Sharma & Anr. 16.5.2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Miss Sunita Khatri } Shri Harsh Saini }, on behalf of Shri A.K.Gupta, for the appellants. Heard learned counsel for the appellants. Perused the impugned order dated 30.5.2002.The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that in respect of the same property, another suit No.322/2000 was filed in which already there is an order of temporary injunction dated 2.5.2002 and therefore the present application is barred under Section 11 CPC. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant. It has been mentioned in the impugned order itself that there is an order of injunction in the earlier suit, however the two suits are different and it is admitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the two suits have not been clubbed together nor ordered to be taken by the same court. It is also admitted that the matters are still pending and therefore it is not a case where earlier suit was heard and finally decided. The order of temporary injunction is only in respect of alienation of the property during the pendency of the suit. In that view of the matter there is no merit in this misc. appeal. The misc. appeal is accordingly dismissed summarily. Since the suit is pending since the year 2000. Learned trial court is directed to take steps with co-operation of the learned counsel and the parties to expedite the hearing of the suit. The appeal as well as the stay application are accordingly dismissed summarily. (DALIP SINGH),J. Ramchandrkhatri,PS