IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 28TH JULY 2011 / 6TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 158 of 2011(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. GOPIKA M.G., AGED 25, W/O.ABHILASH HARILAL, KOUSTHUBHAM, (51/1260), LAL LANE, ESTATE P.O., PAPPANAMKODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-19. 2. TREESA BIVERA, AGED 63, KOUSTHUBHAM, (51/1260), LAL LANE, ESTATE P.O., PAPPANAMKODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-19. BY ADV. SRI.E.NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CITY, VAZHUTHACAD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEMAM POLICE STATION, NEMAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695020. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEMEM POLICE STATION, NEMAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695020. 4. REKHA NIRMAL, C/O.SHARIKA MOHANDAS (HER SISTER), AMBADI NIVAS, MAHATHMA ROAD, THIRUVALLAKKAVU, CHERPPU P.O., THRISSUR-680561. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.C.M.KAMMAPPU R4 BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM SRI.DIPU.R SMT.MERCIAMMA MATHEW SRI.K.S.HARIDAS SRI.V.RENJITH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN WP(CRL).158/11 PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1:THE MARRIAGE AND FAMILY PHOTOS OF THE DETENUE AND THE FIRST PETITIONER. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAITN DATED 31.8.10 SUBMITTED BY THE FIRST PETITIONER BEFORE the SECOND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAITN DATED 19.3.11 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF the RECEIPT ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT EVIDENCING RECEIPT OF EXHIBIT P3 COMPLAINT. /TRUE COPY/ THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ----------------------------------- W.P(Crl.).No.158 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 28th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. This writ petition seeking directions in the nature of Habeas Corpus is essentially a product of controversies in relation to the lives of the petitioners and the 4th respondent. We are told by the learned Government Pleader that the issue was also subject to an open discussion in which the parties were involved. This was telecasted through a particular channel. We also see that efforts for mediation through the Kerala Mediation Centre has failed. There is nothing either on record or by indications on submissions to proceed further with this case. We do not find it necessary to retain this matter any further. This case is accordingly closed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN, Judge. kkb.28/7.