IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16187 of 2009 M/S KISHORE ENTERPRISES Versus UCO BANK & ORS ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Mukundji , Advocate For the Bank: Mrs. Nilu Agrawal, Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate ----------- 2 25.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents Bank. Steps have been taken against the petitioner under SARFAESI Act and notice under section 13(2) of the Act came to be issued against him for the outstanding dues amounting to over Rs. 19 lakhs which was C.C. Account with the respondents Bank. Learned counsel for the petitioner has annexed certain cutting of newspaper report to show that the camps have been organized by the Bank to settle such dispute by offering certain relief to the borrowers. So far the petitioner is concerned he has not even permitted to make offer or participate in such camp being organized by the Bank. There is nothing on record to show that the petitioner is seriously interested in settling the issue by offering concrete commitment to liquidate his dues which have been worked out by the Bank, may be with concession if it is available within the parameter of the policy in existence. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that more camps are going to be organized by the Bank by tomorrow or day after tomorrow. If the petitioner would like to participate in the - 2 - camp with a firm commitment for settlement on the issue he may do so and the commitment will have to be tested by the Bank. Thereafter the Bank may pass order on the commitment given by the petitioner as per the scheme. This writ application stands disposed of with the above liberty to the petitioner. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)