... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.908 OF 2001 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.10348 OF 2001 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Balasaheb Deshmukh i/by Uday Warunjikar for the Applicant. Shri C.G. Patil for the Respondent Nos.7 to 10. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : JULY 24, 2006. : JULY 24, 2006. : JULY 24, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate appearing for the Applicant, Advocate appearing for the Respondent Nos.7 to 10. Unaffirmed copy of reply of the Respondent Nos.7 to 10 is taken on record and the same will be treated as reply to the Application. 2. Application is strongly opposed by the learned Advocate appearing for the Respondent Nos.7 to 10. Considering the averments made in the Application, sufficient cause is made out. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE