HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO. 17312 OF 2006 DATED: 23.8.2006 Between: Mir Shabbir Ali … Petitioner and The A.P. State Wakf Board and another … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO.17312 OF 2006 ORAL ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abdul Nazeeb Khan, learned Standing Counsel for the A.P. Wakf Board. The petitioner and the 2nd respondent are claimants for the Muthawalliship of Ashoor Khana Asthane Asghari, Jam Bagh, Hyderabad. Earlier, the 1st respondent issued a memo dated 8.8.2006, calling upon the petitioner and other addressees to attend the 1st respondent’s office “for discussion of the case”. The learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent states that the aforesaid expression of the 1st respondent denotes that the 1st respondent wanted to afford hearing to the rival claimants to submit their claims and that a decision would be taken on considering the claims. The petitioner apprehends that the 2nd respondent’s claims for Muthawalliship would be considered without considering the petitioner’s claims. Learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent states that the apprehension of the petitioner has no basis as the 1st respondent undertakes to cause an enquiry into the rival claims whereat the claims of both the petitioner, the 2nd respondent and any other claimants would also be considered. In view of the submission made by the learned standing counsel on behalf of the 1st respondent, the petitioner’s grievance does not subsist for adjudication. Recording the submission, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. No order as to costs. ------------------------------ GODA RAGHURAM, J Date: 23.8.2006 CVM