Civil Writ Petition No. 16625 of 2009 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Writ Petition No. 16625 of 2009 Date of Decision: 4.11.2009 Parkash and Others …Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana and Others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) The land of the petitioner was acquired for public purpose of development and utilization of land for the alignment of Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Project for Gurgaon. Counsel for the petitioners, relying upon judgment (Annexure P1) and order passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court (Annexure P2), has submitted that acquisition has become final and the possession of the land of petitioner has been taken by the respondents. Counsel further states that petitioners are Harijans and, therefore, under the Oustee Policy (Annexures P4 and P5) issued by the respondents, they are entitled to the allotment of plots being oustees. On the observation made that petitioners have made no request to the concerned Authorities, counsel for the petitioners has submitted that a representation to this effect was submitted to the Civil Writ Petition No. 16625 of 2009 2 concerned respondents but copy of representation has not been annexed with the present petition. Issue notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Sunil Nehra, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2. Copy of petition has been supplied to Mr. Nehra. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that he will file a detailed representation to all the respondents and he will be satisfied in case respondents are directed to consider the claim and representation of the petitioners for allotment of plot is decided. According to counsel petitioners are oustees and are covered under the policy issued by the respondents from time to time. In these facts and circumstances of the case, it is ordered that in case petitioners submit their representation to the respondents along with certified copy of this order within three weeks from today, the same shall be decided by the respondents within six weeks, by passing a speaking order. With the observations made above, the present writ petition is disposed of. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge November 4, 2009 “DK”