IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16350 of 2009 PRAMOD CHAUDHARY @ PRAMOD KUMAR, son of Ganesh Chaudhary, resident of village-Sarahi, P.S.-Sarahi, District-Saharsa----- --------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Ragni Devi, wife of Sri Pramod Chaudhary, d/o late Banaras Chaudhary, Vill- Shivdaspur, P.S.-Katra, District-Muzaffarpur----------------------Opp. Parties. ----------- 2. 15.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is husband of the complainant alleged along with other family members for demand of motor-cycle as dowry and causing cruelty due to its non-fulfilment which is followed by marrying another girl. Marriage with another girl was denied and for the rest of the allegations it is said that having similar allegations bail to the rest of the family members including distant relations have been allowed by this Court. But I do not find that husband is on the same footing with the rest of the family members. Husband is husband and solely responsible for the affairs (grievances) of the wife. In the case alleged demand is followed by cruelty and marrying another girl. So, I find it not a fit case for anticipatory bail. Prayer of the petitioner is rejected. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )