IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37277 of 2010 ANIL KUMAR S/O SRI SHEO BAHAL PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 29.10.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Considering that the petitioner remained absconding for about 8 years even though his anticipatory bail was rejected way back in 2005, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. However, the petitioner will be liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for purposes of commitment or framing of charge and in case it is done so, the prayer for bail shall not be considered. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )