IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21037 of 2010 SHANKAR SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 2.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission in a Police case under Sections 25(1-b)A and 35 of the Arms Act is of custody since 12.1.2010 for alleged recovery of a loaded country made weapon. The co-accused apprehended without arms have been released on bail. The supplementary affidavit filed today states that the petitioner had antecedent under Sections 392, 394 and lesser provisions of the Penal Code. Considering the submission of approximately six months in custody, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Siwan Town P.S. Case No. 5/2010. The bail bonds must contain the photographs and proof of residence of the sureties which shall be verified through the local police before acceptance. Both the bailors must be his mother and father respectively. 2 The petitioner is directed to be properly represented on each date during trial including his personal appearance on the dates the trial Court so directs. In case of default the Court shall be at liberty to deal with him appropriately so that the trial be facilitated. If the official witnesses do not respond to summons, the Court is directed to initiate summary proceeding against them under Section 350 of the Cr.P.C. and conclude it at the earliest. Since the witnesses appear to be primarily official, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it within six months when the place of posting of the police officers is now easily available in each judgeship forwarded by this Court, as furnished by the Police department. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)