IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.75215-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: MARCH 2, 2007 Satpal ...PETITIONER VERSUS State of Haryana ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. P.P.Chahar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Mor, Sr.DAG, Haryana. Mr.N.S.Shekhawat, Advocate, for the complainant. ... Petitioner Satpal apprehending his arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No.297 dated 15.5.2006 registered under Sections 403/406/420/467/468/120-B/34 IPC at Police Station Civil Lines, Rohtak, District Rohtak, has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail. While issuing notice of motion on November 30, 2006, the arrest of the petitioner was stayed subject to his joining the investigation. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR. Counsel for the petitioner contends that in the aforesaid FIR, it was alleged that co-accused Virender Singh had obtained loan from the complainant falsely and purchased the vehicle on hire purchase agreement. It was alleged that after obtaining possession of the vehicle, he did not produce the same for registration with the authorities and sold the vehicle. Counsel contends that the petitioner was only a guarantor to the said loan and he has been falsely implicated. He has nothing to do with the sale of the said vehicle. Counsel for the petitioner further contends that in terms of the interim order dated January 29, 2007, the petitioner has joined the Crl.Misc.No.75215-M of 2006 -2- investigation. This fact has not been disputed by the State counsel and he further states that the petitioner is no more required for further investigation. In view of the above, the interim order dated November 30, 2006 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions. Disposed of accordingly. March 2, 2007 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE