1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. CONTEMPT PETITION NO.48 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2557 OF 2004 Jayraj Chhotelal Arya. ...Petitioner. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Gr. Bombay. ...Respondents. ....... Mr.Amit Sheth for the Petitioner. Mr. S.S.. Pakale with Ms. T.H. Puranik for the Respondents. ...... CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. September 14, 2009. P.C.: Counsel appearing on behalf of the Municipal Corporation has placed on the record a communication dated 10th September 2009 addressed by the Assistant Engineer (Building and Factory) H/W Ward to the Petitioner. Counsel states that in the eighth condition of the conditions which have been set out, the period of sixty days may be construed as sixty days from the date of this order. Ordered accordingly. In view of the letter addressed by the Municipal Corporation, it has been stated on behalf of the Petitioner by Counsel that the grievance of the Petitioner has been satisfactorily met. In 2 the circumstances, it is not expedient in the interests of justice to pursue the recourse of the contempt jurisdiction of this Court. The Contempt Petition is disposed of. The letter of the Municipal Corporation is taken on record. ....