IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.675 of 2009 Smt.Khatiza Begum Versus Md.Isha Miyan & Ors ---------------------------------- 05. 14.12.2011 Mr. Sumit Kumar Jha, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that by the impugned order the prayer of the plaintiff/petitioner for amendment in the plaint has rejected and as such the same is interlocutory in nature. In view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010(2) PLJR 954, he has made a prayer for converting this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India The prayer is allowed. The petitioner is granted four weeks time to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, failing which this revision application shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. Nitesh ( V. Nath, J.)