IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16907 of 2011 Krishna Sao @ Krishna Kumar Versus Pritam Devi ---------------------------------- 3. 29.09.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 7.4.2011 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna in Matrimonial Case No. 155 of 2009 whereby the learned Court below directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 1500/- per month as maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act and lump sum Rs.2000/- as litigation expenses. The only grievance of the petitioner is that he has no such income. From perusal of the impugned order it appears that the learned court below found that the petitioner is running Chat shop at Patiyala. According to the respondent the income of the petitioner is Rs.8000/-. So far this fact is concerned, learned court below observed that no doubt it was denied by the petitioner but he himself did not disclose what is the income from that shop. Considering these facts and circumstances of the case the learned court below directed the petitioner to pay the amount as stated above. I find no jurisdictional error in the impugned order. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)