IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3537 of 2010 1. NARESH YADAV 2. KUTAI YADAV 3. BIJAY YADAV 4. JEETAN YADAV @ JATEEN YADAV @ JATESH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 01.02.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners while pressing this application seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse section including section 307, submits that the allegation is of brick-batting by the present petitioners causing injuries to the father of the informant. It is next contended that a case has also been lodged by the petitioners’ side relating to the same occurrence in which as many as three persons received injuries. It is further submitted that the injury sustained by the father of the informant was found to be simple and superficial. Learned counsel also highlighted the fact that the parties are agnates and living side by side. Learned APP on going through the materials on record, submits that there appears to be a free fight(brick-batting) between both sides. Be that as it may, having regard to the fact that the injury sustained by the father of the informant is simple, this Court is persuaded to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to these petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners abovenamed, in the event of arrest/surrender within four - 2 - weeks from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10, 000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Bhagalpur in connection with Kahalgaon (Shivnarayanpur) P.S. Case No. 349/09, subject to the condition as laid under section 438 Cr.P.C. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )