IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15560 of 2010 DIP KUMAR VERMA, son of Late Phulena Prasad, resident of Mohalla-Nirala Nagar, P.O.,P.S. & District Siwan. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Principal Scretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna. 3. Jai Prakash University, Chapra, through its Registrar, District-Chapra. 4. The Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, District-Chapra. 5. The Vice-Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, District-Saran at Chapra. 6. Baba Saheb Bheem Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, through it Registrar, District Muzaffarpur. 7. The Vice-Chancellor, Baba Saheb Bheem Rao Ambedkar Bihar University,District Muzaffarpur. 8. The Registrar, Baba Saheb Bheem Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 17.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent-University as also the State. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of compound interest at the rate of 12.5% and merger of 50% dearness relief in his basic pension. Learned counsel for the respondent-Universities submits that both the aforesaid matters are sub judice before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that with regard to the merger of 50% dearness relief in the basic - 2 - pension, the petitioner proposes to represent his grievances in the light of the Government Resolution No.2245 dated 16th of July, 2010, as contained in Annexure 5, before the Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra (respondent no.4), with a copy to the Registrar, Bheem Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur (respondent no.8). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of his grievances as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. In case the representation of the petitioner is accepted, the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)