1 D.B.Criminal Revision Petition No.1280/2009. Ram Prasad. VERSUS Smt.Maya Devi and Another. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER D.B.Criminal Revision Petition No.1280/2009. Ram Prasad. VERSUS Smt.Maya Devi and Another. 19.05.2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHUVENDRA S.RATHORE Mr.Rajveer Singh, for the petitioner. Mr.G.S.Fauzdar, Public Prosecutor. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the judgment of the learned trial court. We find that the learned trial court has clearly held that the allegation with regard to the accused Maya Devi of having caused injuries to Ramesh Devi and Barfi Devi are not proved. Moveover, there is no corroboration of ocular evidence with regard to Maya Devi having inflicted injuries with hands and fists as there is no injury found on the person of the injured, as per the medical evidence. The learned trial court has also taken into consideration the fact that Maya Devi in fact snatched axe from the hands of Subey Singh who was about to strike and inflict injuries with the said axe. 2 D.B.Criminal Revision Petition No.1280/2009. Ram Prasad. VERSUS Smt.Maya Devi and Another. In the facts and circumstances, therefore, the view which has been taken by the learned trial court as against Maya Devi who has been acquitted by the learned trial court cannot be said to be perverse. In the facts and circumstances, we find no reason to interfere with the judgment of the learned trial court so far as the accused Maya Devi is concerned. Consequently, this revision petition stands dismissed. (RAGHUVENDRA S.RATHORE),J. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.