IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1002 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- BIPINCHANDRA CHHAGANLAL LAHARU Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 1002 of 1995 MR HARIN P RAVAL for Petitioner No. 1 GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 1-5 DS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for Respondent No. 2-5 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL Date of decision: 24/10/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.H.P.Raval, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, states that the petition has become infructuous since the cause is not surviving and, therefore, he is not pressing the matter as it has become infructuous. Disposed of as not pressed and as having become infructuous. Rule discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated. 24-10-2002 (Jayant Patel, J.) vinod