IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16981 of 2009 BABITA KUMARI @ MRS.BABITA KUMARI, W/O SRI BIRENDRA PRASAD SINGH, R/O DEORIA (HAKIM SINGH TOLA), P.O. AND P.S.-DEORIA, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. ………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUZAFFARPUR. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MUZAFFARPUR, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BLOCK- PAROO, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. 5. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, PAROO, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. 6. THE HEAD MASTER, GIRLS MIDDLE SCHOOL, DEORIA, P.S.-DEORIA, BLOCK-PAROO, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR. 7. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, DEORIA EAST, P.S.-PAROO, DISTRICT-MUZAFFARPUR. …………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3 30.08.2010 In this writ application petitioner has challenged the order passed by the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur on the ground that after the 2006 Rules came into force, the District Magistrate has no power to pass any orders in the matter of Panchayt Sikshak. The challenge was precisely on the ground of lack of jurisdiction with the District Magistrate under the Rules. Learned counsels informs this Court that some parties had moved the Appellate Authority constituted under the Rules which has passed final orders. In the circumstances, the writ 2 application has lost its utility and, therefore, the same is disposed of as infructuous. The petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the order of the Appellate Authority, if so advised, in an appropriate proceeding. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)