IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9129 of 2010 1. HIRA MUNI DEVI @ HIRA MUNI KUMARI W/O SRI GANESH CHOUDHARY R/O VILL.- MANIBARI, P.S.- DINARA, DISTT.- ROHTAS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DISTT.- ROHTAS AT SASARAM 3. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER DISTT.- ROHTAS AT SASARAM 4. C.D.P.O., P.S.- DINARA DISTT.- ROHTAS AT SASARAM ----------- 02. 29.04.2011 It appears that against the order of the District Programme Officer, as contained in Annexure-3, cancelling her engagement, petitioner has already filed her representation before the Collector as contained in Annexure-5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no orders have been passed by the Collector on the said representation till now. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with direction to the Collector to consider the representation of the petitioner, issue notice to the parties, get any inquiry held, if necessary, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law preferably with a period of three months from the date of 2 receipt/production of a copy of this order. Devendra/ ( J.N. Singh, J)