IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14971 of 2009 1. JYOTISH VERMA, son of Panna Lal Verma 2. Panna Lal Verma, son of Nand Lal Verma 3. Lal Muni Devi, wife of Panna Lal Verma All residents of villager-Dabni, P.S.-Banshdih, District-Ballia(U.P.)------------ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Rinki Devi, wife of Jyotish Verma, village-Dabni, P.S.-Banshdih, District- Ballia and at present residence of Sarimpur Golambar, P.S.-Buxar, 2nd, District-Buxar--------------------------------------------------------Opp. Parties. ----------- 2. 30.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners I find that a contradictory allegation has been leveled by the complainant against her husband and harassed the family members. Husband has been shown impotent, even then demand is shown to be made. Divorce case has also been filed where potency has been challenged by the petitioners i.e. not so much relevant but in any case allegations discussed above does not entitle petitioners arrest. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case no.684 (C ) of 2005, 1565 Tr. of 2007, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sudhakar Singh, S.D.J.M., Buxar, Distt.-Buxar , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )