IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THIS THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.184 OF 2010 Between: 1. Seelam George S/o. Nadipo Venkatanna 2. Seelam Ramudu S/o. George …. Petitioners AND The State of A.P., Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad, through S.H.O., Oravakal Mandal, Kurnool District, …. Respondent HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.184 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioners Seelam George and Seelam Ramudu, against the judgment dated 01-02-2010 in Criminal Appeal No.192 of 2009 passed by the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kurnool. 2. Heard. 3. The de facto complainant Seelam Chinna Rangaswamy and the petitioners are present and on being questioned, the de facto complainant reports that the matter has been compromised between them out of Court, as such, they may be permitted to compound the offence and consequently acquit the petitioners closing the complaint. 4. The de facto complainant produced his original Household Card in proof of his identity, which contains his photograph, and it shows his father’s name as Venkata, date of birth as 10-06-1958 residential address as House No.3-9, Sakunala Street, Sakunala Colony, Sakunala Village, Orvakal Mandal, Kurnool District. Thus, there is no dispute about the identity of the de facto complainant. Petitioners are identified by their counsel. 5. In the circumstances particularly in view of the fact that the parties have amicably settled the matter between them out of Court, they can be permitted to compound the offence and the petitioners can be acquitted of the offence. 6. Accordingly, the parties are permitted to compound the offence and Criminal R.C.M.P.(SR) No.10623 of 2010 is allowed compounding the offence between the parties. 7. As a sequel, the Criminal Revision Case is also allowed setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioners by both the Courts below and they are acquitted of the offence under Section 324 IPC. The fine amount, if any, paid by the petitioners shall be returned to them. ___________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J April 15, 2010. KTL