IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25546 of 2008 GAUTAM KUMAR & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 31.7.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioners, the State as well as the counsel appearing for the complainant. Petitioner no.1 Gautam Kumar is present in court. He is adamant not to continue his relationship with the complainant as husband and wife. His case is that he was forced to marry. On the other hand the complainant submits that at the time of marriage he was not under stress. Now he has changed his attitude. Considering this fact I find that the petitioner no.1 Gautam Kumar is completely under the influence of his family members specially mother and father. Considering this fact that the Gautam Kumar is a student and he has to continue his studies, his prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. He is directed to surrender before the S.D.J.M.Nawada within four weeks from today and on his so surrendering he shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M.Nawada in connection with Complaint case no.661 of 2007 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. So far petitioner no.2 Uday Prasad Singh and 3. Sunaina Devi are concerned their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. In case the petitioners deposits necessary costs, the order dated 18.7.2008 as well as the order passed today should be faxed to - 2 - the court concerned. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)