IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.22397 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: December 02, 2011 Surinder Kumar …..Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.R.K. Arora, Advocate for the petitioner .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the span of last five months transfer of the petitioner has been effected three times. At present he is working at Gurdaspur. According to learned counsel, petitioner has already filed a representation (Annexure P-3) regarding his grievance about frequent transfers effected. However, no decision has been taken thereon. Notice of motion. On the asking of the court, Mr.B.S.Chahal, DAG, Punjab, who is present in court, accepts notice. Learned State counsel submits that he has no objection in case a direction is issued by this court for taking a decision on the representation (Annexure P-3) submitted by the petitioner. Under the circumstances, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned authority to take a decision on representation (Annexure P-3) keeping in view facts and circumstances of the case and the policy framed by the Government. Needful be done within a period of two months. December 02, 2011 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE