IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 14476 of 1993 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- LALLUBHAI M. PATEL THRO' HIS HEIRS Versus DY COLLECTOR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MA KHARADI for Petitioners Mr A.G.Uraizee, AGP, for M/S PURNANAND & CO for Respondents. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT Date of decision: 15/04/96 ORAL JUDGEMENT The petitioner has questioned the judgment and order passed by the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal on 24.4.92 in Revision Application No.TEN.B.S.166/88 whereby the revision preferred before the Tribunal came to be allowed and the case is remanded to the Mamlatdar and ALT (Ceiling), Navsari for properly considering the holding of the applicant-petitioner, by filing this petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. 2. After having examined the facts and circumstances and hearing the learned counsel appearing for the parties, this Court is not inclined to entertain special, extraordinary, plenary, equitable writ jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution against the impugned order of remand. Therefore, this petition is required to be rejected. Accordingly, it is rejected. Rule discharged. Interim relief shall stand vacated. ........