BEFORE THE H_Q&'§LE aIQH QQQRT QF QHHAI !;§§ARH AT BILA§EUR WRTPE ON s .%“\Q zom PETITIQNER : Bharat Singh, aged about 47 years, S/o. Shrl Jawahar Lal Slngh, Occupation: Service, posted as Constable (Excise), O/o. Excise Officer, Korea (Baikunthpur), District Korea, Chhattisgarh VER$L§ ow “91 fwnmp‘f .%.§m§5 W ing (we) f5 ' e... w” *‘ twK‘ RESPONDENTS: /1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, ,, Department of Commerciai Tax (Excise), Mantraiaya, Raipur (CG) The Under Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Commercial Tax (Excise), DKS Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (CG) 3. The Excise Commissioner, Raipur, Chhattisgarh /4. The Collector, Korea (Baiku‘nthpur) Chhattisgarh /5. The District Excise Officer, District Korea (Balkunthpur) Chhattisgarh WR__I_T UNDER ARTI E 226 OF THE CON T T TION OF INDIA FOR I§§ AN E F APPROPRIAT T IN THE NATURE OF MANQAMUS CERTIORARI R Y OTHE h‘g_ *lxw WRITIWRITS OR 0RDER£ORDERS OR QIBEgTION OR DIRECTIONS QF TNE LIKE . :,~._WEIhesnetitimnaE.gtatnu-lc_tw / .r % it; . ’ . . ’M h ,r V ' / HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.3416 OF 2010 (Writ Petition under AItiCIe 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 19‘“ day orJanuary, 201 1) Heard Iearned counsel for the patties. Learner} counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though the order of transfer dated 28-6~2010 (Annexure — P/1) shows that the petitioner has been transferred from Koria to Raipur on his own will and expenses, but the petitioner has ne\;er made any 3. Interim order with regard to status quo as obtained on 12-7-2010 was granted by this Court. The respondent authorities have failed to file return till date in contradiction of the statement of the petitioner that he has not made any application for transfer on his 4. At this stage, Iearned counsel appearing for the State submits that the State may be granted liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in view public interest and administrative exigency. Shri Bhaduri, learned Panel Lawyer further submits that the State shall not insist upon compliance of the impugned order dated 28-6-2010 (Annexure P/1). 5. ln view of the above, according to Iearned counsei appearing for the petitioner nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. A Nx- application for such transfer. OWn eXpenSeS. Gowri S / V Satish V K-Agnj d/~ . ,i fr Jlldge hat“ / PETlTlONER Bharat Singh RESPONDENTS Versus