IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 23RD AUGUST 2007 / 1ST BHADRA 1929 RP.No. 811 of 2007(C) ------------------------ (AGAINST THE ORDER DTD. 6.8.07 IN WPC.20602/2007) .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------- 1. DIRECTOR (MIS) AND STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CHIEF ENGINEER (CORPORATE PLG) & APPELLATE AUTHORITY, RIT ACT, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. G.KRISHNAN, 'ASHIANA', PADUVAPURAM, ERNAKULAM. 2. STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, PUNNAN ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-39, REP. CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER. BY ADV. SRI.M.AJAY, SC, STATE INFORMATION COMMN SMT.DAISY A.PHILIPOSE THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ R.P.NO.811 of 2007 in WP(C) NO. 20602 of 2007 - ------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of August, 2007 O R D E R The petitioners in this review petition seek review of my order dated 6.8.2007 on the ground that a review petition has been filed by the petitioners before the State Information Commission, Thiruvananthapuram, which is pending which fact was omitted to be brought to the notice of this Court at the time of passing order dated 6.8.2007. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for the Board could not satisfy me that such a review petition is maintainable before the Commission. Further, the impugned order has been passed after hearing the counsel for the petitioners in the review petition. The petitioners also submit that since counter affidavit has already been filed, the matter may be heard finally. RP NO. 811 of 2007 :-2-: 3. I do not think that these are reasons for review of my order. If the petitioners are aggrieved by that order, their remedy lies in filing an appeal. Therefore, I do not find any merit in the review petition and the same is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, Judge Mbs/ RP NO. 811 of 2007 :-3-: S.SIRI JAGAN, J ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) NO. OF 2001 ------------------------------------ J U D G M E N T RP NO. 811 of 2007 :-4-: DATED: -08-2007