!,-'• ""'< .F.l^" IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WR1T PETITION N0^51J° OF 2005 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS ^^' '%."•'" ytf- /y:^ aTri-,:^, /^"<^'!-l^e»""^ N^"'>'ts'i;^l ,tT C7'. V ^ ^P- ^ v^—.^^ ^?^?^ '"-^as-asss / ...<-"^' -j s^" sJL< ^w ^o VERSUS ^1) ^.'^t^y'' f~y~, ..' ^Js^"' '::l":^vl" G. l^ s^- ^2) ^3) -4) /5} 6) ^7) CfflTRAKANT SHARMA, S/o. Krishna kumar Sharma Age About 27 Years, R/o Gram - Majar-katta, Post - Thana - Gariyaband, Distt: Raipur(C.G.) STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, Through the Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur. THE DIRECTOR, Lok Shikshan, Sanchanalay, D. K. S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). THE COLLECTOR, Raipur (C.G.). Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mishan, Distt: Raipur (C.G.) District Project Coordinator, Rajiv Gandhi Shksha Mishan, Distt: Raipur(C.G.) Vikaskhand Strot Khand Samanvayak, Rajiv Gandhi, Shiksha Mishan, Block Office Chhura, Garyaband, Distt: Raipur(C.G.) C. I. R. D. Chhattisgarh Institute for Research and Development, Through Project Manager, MIG -30, Sector -3, Disndayal Upadhaya Nagar, Dagania, Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA EFi: '""y ^l /^ ^SEf "41<<ifl<4, (?xi1y'](o, t^TRTy i^f ^r^-T sn •i^w 'Bfcasaieei -12-200S wzfeqn ••ffq^ffir fe'zt ti3n?TC ^SilTO 311^1 Pt Cf Siiri Sum! Sahu, Couiisel for the {^tmoner. Siiri Saiideep L'hibev', Govt Advo4'ite, tw the Appiicfftion LA. No. 9523/2005 fijir urgent hearing is allowed, Heard on I.A No. 9524/2005 tb4 exemption fi-om tiling typed copy o ntten nocuments. Tlie appiicaiion is allowed. The petitioner is exenipted from riimg typed ^inv ofhand UTitteii documents. Leanied counsei tbr me oetitiontr aeement Service Aeencv and oursiiant Shifcsha Mission and resnondent no. 7. dlited 23-2-2005 Aimexiire P-1 for coati |e contract. period, .he faas now been| Amesi.ire P-5 dated 31-8-2005 alone w.itl Leanieii counsel for the State sutt s^proacbed r.o this Coiirt and fae has not si At this sta.ge, counsel fbr the pej •ifctitioner mav be dven a.n onooffiinj.tv ti a.ad 5 and thev mav decidc the sa.me. Hamiig considersd Mid wjthout e' i.se, in the opinioii ofthis Court eads siibmits fhat the resoondent no, 7 is a to an agreemem betiveea Raj'eev Gandhi fjie petitioner was issued a.ppomtment. order j-act period. He fiirt'her submitted that after repatriated to respondent no. 7 a.s per :]i 15 otb.er eniployees. ut^niitted that the pctitioner has straiglihvay inniitT.ed any rep 'itioner siibmitted that for the nresent the ) tjle reoresentation betbre resnondents no. ^•pressmg any opinion on rhe merite ofthe of iustice will be .served if a direction is jven to tne petitioner to make a detjijiled represent'ition raismg his grievanees ^Atorefneuompetent aufhority ofthe resfciondents along with a. copy ofthe netition "s-' Gi.PK 'P—12/2000—SO'OOO. ,.4I ni;']^^:';i[: ii.i! 75T •<11<-IK:1'i<,^fll*l;16, f "\^"JEV SsS r" and tMs order, witlim 1 5 dayg from today, and on suefa representauon bemg fiied, the competent. authority ofthe respvndents shalUdeeide the same on its owa merits m accordance with law a.s eariy a.s possible prefcrably within hvo mQirths from the i date of receipt of flie representaticp. It is ma.de ciear that if a.Dy gri.evance gT.ill remains, the petitioaer may ava.il*jhe|remedy available under the ]aw. With the aforesaid observa.tio^, this petition srands disposed of. Coiiseouentlv. M.W.P.No.4510/2005 also sf.ancls disoosed of. Certified copy a,s per mles. Sd/_ Fakhruddin Judge ^ -\ >