: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LDG.) NO.584 OF 2009 M/s.Boolani Engineering Corpn.& Anr. ....Petitioners V/s. The Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply And Transport ....Respondent Mr.Harish Pandya with Mr.Naresh S.Fadia for the Petitioners. Mr.H. Toor i/b M.V. Kini & Co. for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 30TH MARCH, 2009. P.C. : 1. Firstly, the Writ Petition raises various disputed questions of fact. It is not possible in this Writ Petition to deal with the detailed arithmetics of various bills and the alleged payments against them. The same have been considered in the impugned orders. The impugned orders have been passed after considering the relevant facts. There is nothing that indicates that the same has not been based on the relevant material. Even as regards the alleged payment of Rs.3,52,979/-, there is no clear correlation qua the earlier bill for a period of 17.3.1997 to 2.3.2001 in the sum of Rs.5,23,093=32 ps. 2. In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed. : 2 : 3. The Petitioner is at liberty to deposit the amounts as claimed without prejudice to his rights and contentions in order to avail of the electricity connection urgently. The same, if deposited, shall entitle the Petitioner to reconnection but will not prejudice the Petitioner’s right to claim a refund thereof. In view of what is stated above, the dismissal of this Writ Petition will obviously not prejudice the Petitioner’s case on merits.