s^ Petitioner Responttents HISH COURT W CHHAmSGARH: BILASPUR Writ PeflUon (Sl No. TOBOof 2B08 Sohendra Kumar Tikariha aged 60years Son of Bholaram Tikariha, Lecturer Oovt.Hjgher Secondary School, Borai District Durg (C.G.) Versus 1) State Gwemment of Chhattisgarh, Through the Seorstary, Sohool Educatien Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(CG). 2) District Eduation Offlcer, Duig (C.G.) (Writ Pstltion under Article226 of the Cwstitution of India) SB: Hon'bte Mr. SaUsh K. ^nlhotri, J. Present: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel fbr the (^itioner. Shri Y.S.Thatwr, Dy. Advooate General for the State. ORALOROER (Passed on 17*' day of Aprtl, 200^ Wlth consent of both the parttes, the (natter is heard flnalty. 1) tjeamed ea.insel appearir^ fior the petltlonersiA»nitsthtf the petitloi»r is entitled to seoond Kramonn^i as per oircutar dated 17-3-1999/19-4-199S (Annexure P/1A) after comptetion of 24 yeare of seM'ce. Leamai counset furfher submits that the issue involved In the present petitksn has already been considered and deefcled bythis Court in R.S. Verma Vs. StatsofGhhatUsaartt ancl ottiws'* by Juc^ment and order dated 29-8-20M. Leamedcounsel further submits that the petitioner may begranted Ifbertytomakea representatlontoconsicterthecaseofthe petitioner in the ijght ofthe judgment passed bythe 1-lon'yeSupFemeCffljrt in Stata «rfTripunande eRtVs.K.K. Roy2ancl the onter paesed i" R.8. \itan'a (supm), to wliich leamed counsel appearing for the resporKluits^tate has no ol^ection. 2) Accordingly, liberty sought for by the petitkaner Is granted to make a representation before the conoemed authorities. 3) In view of the above, the petitlui ts diqaos®!of with the aforesafd liberty. Sd/- ; SatishK.Agnihotri Judge 1W.P.No.2aKflOCe 22004SCW1