IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 1ST MARCH 2010 / 10TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 2294 of 2010(J) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. RADHAMANI, W/O. SURENDRAN, KIZHAKKEPURACKAL HOUSE, KAVANNUR,MALAPPURAM. 2. SRI.KUNHALAN, VETTEKODE HOUSE, P.O. PUNNACKAL, THIRUVAMBADY. BY ADV. MR.K.A.SALIL NARAYANAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESETNED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, K.S.E.B.KUNNAMANGALAM. 3. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, THIRUVMABADY. 4. SRI.SUDHAKARAN, THONIPARA HOUSE, PUNNACKAL P.O., THIRUVAMBADY. 5. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, COLLECTORATE, KOZHIKODE. R1 TO R3 BY ADV. MR.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. BIJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J --------------------------- W.P(C) No.2294 of 2010-J ---------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of March, 2010. J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is constrained to approach this Court by filing the present Writ Petition because of the fact that the objection raised by the petitioner with regard to the drawing of the electric line was finally heard by the fifth respondent and the matter was posted on 27.1.2010 for pronouncing the orders, despite which the orders are still to be passed or communicated to the petitioners. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be satisfied if the petitioners are given one weeks’ time to take further steps, if the order to be passed by the fifth respondent goes against the petitioner. 3. In the above facts and circumstances, this Court does not find it necessary to issue notice to the fourth respondent for the time being. Accordingly, the fifth respondent is directed to finalise the proceedings pursuant to Ext.P2 notice by pronouncing the orders and communicating the same to the petitioner. This shall be W.P(C) No.2294 of 2010-J 2 done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is also made clear that the implementation of the said order to be passed by the fifth respondent shall be kept in abeyance for a further period of ten days, if against the petitioner, so as to enable the petitioner to pursue further remedy in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE //True Copy// P.A to Judge ab