IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16552 of 2003 RAM SWARUP PRASAD SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR For the petitioner: Shri Anjani Kumar,Advocate For the State: Shri Yogendra Kumar Singh,A.P.P. ----------- 5. 3.9.2010 After having heard learned counsel for the parties and after having perused the materials placed on record which includes statements of the witnesses recorded in an enquiry held under Section 202 Cr. P.C., this could not be said for sure that that very part of the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hillsa which speaks of the requirement of sanction is erroneous and appears reflecting a bad view taken by the Additional Sessions Judge. The earlier part of the same order dated 13.5. 2003 passed in Cr. Revision No. 46 of 2000 which considers the malicious intent for filing a false complaint, for reasons as indicated in that order, could not be said to be bad and in that view, setting aside of the summoning order appears properly passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. The petition appears of no merit. It is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)