IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35076 of 2009 VINAY KUMAR DUTTA son of Vimal Ram resident of Village RBI Colony, Danapur PS Danapur Dist. Patna at present resident of Village Nasariganj PS Danapur Dist. Patna Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR . Opposite party ----------- 2 19.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case under sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the complainant was the owner of the gas agency under the women category quota. She went in to partnership with one Sanjay Yadav who invested large amount of money in the said business. After investing the amount he applied for dealership on the ground that she has violated the terms of the licence/agreement. In retaliation in order to retain her agency, she filed a case of theft against this petitioner. The Erstwhile Manager alleged that he had stolen all the registers and documents. It is submitted that the case of theft has been filed in order to save herself for filing show cause before the authority concerned. Be that as it may, the petitioner ( Vinay Kumar Datta) is directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today in connection with Phulwari P.S. case no. 609 of 2005 on furnishing bail bond of rupees ten thousand with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. shahid (Sheema Ali Khan,J)