IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. App. No. 340 of 2009 Naveen Sharma & others. .……… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand & another. .……… Respondents Mr. Sharad Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Harish Pujari, Addl. Government Advocate for respondent No. 1. Ms. Mamta Joshi, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. The parties have compromised the matter. Compounding Application No. 515 of 2009 has also been filed, which is supported by the individual, separate affidavits of the petitioner and respondent No. 2, which I have perused. The petitioner as well as respondent No. 2 are also present in person in the Court. I have talked to respondent No. 2 and she has confirmed about the compromise. Based on the aforesaid, Compounding Application No. 515 of 2009 is allowed. The offences are compounded with the resultant consequence that Criminal Misc. Application No. 340 of 2009 is allowed and the proceedings are quashed with all the consequences. (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 19.05.2009 G