IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.4540 of 2010 TENI @ SUNIL SINGH, S/O KEDAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR **** /4/ 04.03.2010 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioner was refused bail on 27.10.2009 on the ground of wrong statement having been made in the petition that he had no criminal antecedents. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail annexing Annexure 7, which is a bail order of the petitioner passed in Cr. Misc. No. 29008 of 2009. From the perusal of the order it appears that the petitioner was released on bail on condition that he would give an affidavit that he is not an accused in any other case. Since I am the person who has passed the order I know fully that the conditions must have been imposed on account of the submission that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case. In effect this means that the petitioner has repeatedly been trying to deceive the Court about his antecedents which I do not view very fairly. Under the circumstances, I am not inclined to review my earlier order. 3. The prayer for bail is rejected. 4. Let this order be communicated to the Additional District Judge, II, Patna, who is in seisin of Session's 2 Trial No. 536 of 2009 arising out of Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 415 of 2008, at the cost of the Court, that in case he has not released the petitioner on bail already he should refrain from doing so. In case he has passed a positive order, notices should be issued to the petitioner immediately for cancellation of bail on account of having given a wrong statement before the Court. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)