IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8158 of 2010 AKHILESH KUMAR @ AKHILESH SAHNI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.04.2010 Heard Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Patahi P.S.Case No.64/09 dated 2.08.2009 registered under Sections 366 (A), 120 (B) and 153 (A) of the I.P.C. According to the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have kidnapped one Rinku Kumari, minor daughter of the informant for the purpose of marriage. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged victim girl Rinku Kumari is major and she has voluntarily married with the petitioner. In support of that, he refers to certificates of the marriage vide Annexure 2 and 2/1 issued by the Marriage Officer, Patna. It is further submitted that statement of the victim girl Rinku Kumari was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. on 10.02.2010 wherein leaned Magistrate has assessed her age to be 22 years, though the victim claimed to be aged about 21 years. The report of 2 Medical Board vide Annexure-4 also shows that she was assessed to be aged about 18-19 years. In the aforesaid background, let the petitioner abovenamed, in the event of arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks from today be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M, Sikarahana, District-Motihari in connection with Patahi P.S.Case No.64/09 subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. V.K. Pandey (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)