/s S.B. (ServiceMatter) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) \^-\ WRIT PETITIONfSl N0^l /2011. PETITIONER: ^^..Vi ^;..:;^ ^•^^r ,<9- ••-^At Respondents Udraj, son of Dhani Ram, aged about 36 years, Waterman, Pahadi Korwa, Ashram Tirang, Block Batouli, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Coininissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Sarguja,, ^/Chhattisgarh. 4. Collecto^r, Sarguja, District Sarguja, phhattisgarh. S. Block Education Officer, Block Batouli, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA y *si*ins «»HI^» ^^T r*lt^ld^, ^til-H^Ko', [®tdiyl|,< ^..£^..311Lt./.u....•^200 ^TT^?T 'l^W ('T^f3®r^T) ^TT^T'SPT ^TRF '^TSH ^TT^T sn^ict) ^KII^ -tif^a 3TT^T w |SB ; Hon»bleShri Manindm 22.6.2011 Shri C.J. K. Rao with petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Pane copy. Leamed coiinsel for fhe relating to claim of contracj employees came up for consid| No.2004/11 and bat.ch of pet3| of the petitioners, this Courlj case in those cases. He subml covered by the aforcsaid orde4 On the ofher hand, that the representation of fh( due verification^ After gomg through th| W.P. (S) No.2004/11, itisap|) is squarely covered by tli^ petitioner is also entitled to fj^ Accordiugly, it is direct^ representation before tlie co4<: cnKif^^'T 'HFi^ff ^* fe^ <f^^{< ^ 3tfW^T?^[ ;ohan Shrivastava, J.] |hri Akshay Yadav counsel for ftie Law5'rer for fhe State, on advance petitioner submits that tlie issue lual payment to Cook and other iration before this Court in W.P. (S) tions and after examining tlie claim had directed consideration of the its that the case of the petitioncr is leatned counsel for the State submits petitioner would be decided after order dated 15.4.2011 passed in ap|>arent fhat tb.e case of the petit.ioner aforesaid order. Therefore, the same direct.ion in tlie case. d fliat if the pet-itloner makes fresh ;em.ed aufhority, claiming payuient 4. K^ rr %^s: '%@^' XI-HG—78 -3%r ^l|<||<>1<q, ^)Tli'(-|<t^, fsK'll'Hy HWWi WfVWK •^200 ^TT TRRT (^f^c^T) ^S^ ^T |<<1|ch cT^T 3ll<^^j %)^|ch ^nw^rf^3:n^T <?)i^i<n<fl<i 'Hprof "^f fe^ ^f^5R ^^ffipT^TT^T ffe Praveen of minimum wages applicab Chhattisgarh Civil Service (< the same shall be disposed le to a contract employee under the Sontract Appointment) Rules, 2004, of in accordance witili law, within a period of eight weeks f^om. fhe date of submission of representation^ In the event|of any adverse order^ the petitioner would be at liberty to file wr4 petition afresh. With the aforesaid dtrd of. ction, the petition is fmally disposed Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge