IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2286 of 2004 DR.NARENDRA NATH MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Najmul Hoda, Advocate For the opposite party no.2: Mr. Shivendra Kishore, Advocate --- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice And Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal --- Dated, the 22nd July, 2008 On 5th February, 2004 the following order came to be passed: “However, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner there is some discrepancy in the calculation and as such, as prayed, this matter is finally concluded with the liberty to the petitioner to represent before the authority concerned with full details and supporting document, rule etc., which shall be considered and disposed of by a reasoned order.” 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the representation made by him, the concerned authority of Magadh University has not passed reasoned order. 3. From the supplementary show cause filed on behalf of opposite party nos. 3 to 6, it transpires that the entire lawful dues have been paid. 4. Surely, in the backdrop of this situation, it cannot 2 be said that respondents are guilty of willful disobedience of the order of this court. 5. Moreover, it appears from the order dated 5th February, 2004 that regarding few other grievance of the petitioner the matter is pending in this court. 6. Be that as it may, we are satisfied that no further action in this contempt petition needs to be taken. However, if there is any grievance of the petitioner with regard to any error in calculation or unpaid amount, we grant liberty to the petitioner to bring this aspect to the notice of the concerned authorities. We further observe that in that situation, the concerned authority would objectively consider the petitioner’s grievance. 7. MJC stands disposed of. R. M. Lodha, CJ. Kishore K. Mandal, J. Neyaz/-