IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10995 of 2007 Between: 1 Y. Bayya Reddy, S/o. Siddareddy, R/o. 163, bhavani Nagar, Thirupathi, Chittoor District. 2 P. Venkateshwarlu, S/o. Ramaiah, Tirupathi Co-Operative Bank Ltd., R/o. 6-1-1-1C4, MCR Colony, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Registrar/Commissioner of Coopertive Socities, Gruhakalpa Complex, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 The Chairman/Person Incharge Committee, Thirupathi Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Thirupathi, Chitoor District. 3 The District Collector/Election Authority, Chittoor District. 4 The Joint Registrar/District Co-Operative Officer, Thirupathi, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction moreparticuarlly one in the natureof writ of mandamus declaring the inactionof the respondent No.2 in not considering the representation dt. 12.04.2007 of the 1st petitioner heein for inclusion of his name in the Eligible Voters list submitted by the 2nd respondent to the third respondent for conducting elections to the 2nd respondent bank in spite of theorders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No.3740/2007 dt. 09.04.2007 and issuing theproceedings in Rc.No.46/02-B, Dt. 20.05.2007 notifying the election schedule to the 2nd respondent Bank as arbitrary,illegal and set aside the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to accept the diﬀerence of share capital from all the members of the society and include them in the eligible list of voters of the 2nd respondent bank and pass suchother order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.ANDAPALLI SANJEEV KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10995 of 2007 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. _________ 11.09.2008 JSU ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JGK} THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10995 of 2007 Date: 11.09.2008 JSU