IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 5TH MARCH 2010 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 7179 of 2010(V) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- VELAYUDHAN PILLAI, KADACKAL HOUSE, SOORANADU, PANTHRANDU MURI, PAVUMBA P.O. KARUNAGAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SECRETARY, SOORANADU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, SOORANADU, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 2. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, KOLLAM. 3. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, KOLLAM. 4. NOORUDEEN KUNJU, NIZAR BHAVANAM, KADACKAL KIZHAKKATHIL, SOORANADU, PANTHRANDU MURI, PAVUMBA P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY. SC FOR PCB SRI. M.K. CHANDRAMOHAN DAS GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.K. DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.7179 OF 2010 (V) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner complains that the 4th respondent is operating a brick manufacturing unit close to his property without obtaining licence. It is stated that complaining of this he has filed Ext.P3 before the first respondent and that no action is taken on Ext.P3. 2. If as stated by the petitioner Ext.P3 has been received and is pending before the first respondent, it is directed that the first respondent shall deal with Ext.P3 with notice to the 4th respondent. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of this writ Petition. It is made clear that this court has not pronounced anything on the merits of the case and it is entirely for the first respondent to deal with the matter. Writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :