IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1358 of 2008 BHARAT BHUSHAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 20.07.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner who is the informant (P.W.6), assails the impugned order, passed by learned trial court in 410/05/46/06, whereby O.P.Nos.2 to 6 were tried and acquitted. The submission of the petitioner is that the evidence was not properly evaluated by trial court. This court finds that learned trial court considered the evidence in great detail. Some of the witnesses have stated about certain role played by O.P.No.2 herein in the occurrence, whereas some of them have contradicted the same. According to them, co-accused Rameshwar Singh exhorted whereafter co-accused Jitendra Singh fired upon the victim causing his death. By the impugned order, co-accused Jitendra Singh has been convicted under section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for life. It further appears from the records that co-accused Rameshwar Singh is facing another trial relating to the present case. Counsel for the petitioner has not been able to show any patent illegality meriting interference with the impugned order. The application is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )