FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATIONNO.133 OF 2010 (Fatah Masjid Trust & ors. Vs. Maharashtra State Board of Wakfs & ors.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Shri A.M. Pathan, Advocate holding for Shri G.D. Shaikh, Advocate for petitioners Shri Y.B. Khan, Advocate for R.No.1 & 2 Shri J.H. Deshmukh, Advocate for R.Nos.3 & 4 ... CORAM: K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 6th December, 2010 1. Heard. Directions issued below Exhibit 13 in Application No.56/2010, dated 12.8.2010 are questioned. On perusal of the order, it is explicit that the learned Presiding Officer consciously, considering the rivalry between the groups, has desired to carry modifications/ repairs/ construction to the property of the Dargah under the supervision of the Wakf Officer. I do not see any illegality in such directions as it was to save the property to avoid the ongoing feud between the rival groups. Civil Revision Application lacks merits, dismissed. No costs. (K.U. CHANDIWAL) JUDGE fmp/cra133.10