1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.2144 OF 2005 Smt.Vasanti Hanumant Padale. ...Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mr. V. A. Sugdare for the Petitioner. Mr. P. M. Patil, AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr. S. B. Deshmukh for Respondent No.2. ..... CORAM : A.P. SHAH AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. June 27, 2005. P.C.: This petition is based on a purchase notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The notice is annexed at Exhibit 'D' to the petition. If we peruse the notice, it is clearly seen that it is not a notice in terms of Section 127. The notice merely says that the Respondents should release the property within six months from the date of the receipt of the notice. Surely this notice cannot be regarded as a purchase notice contemplated by Section 127. Petition is, therefore dismissed. However, it is made clear that this order shall not preclude the Petitioner from giving a fresh notice under Section 127. 2