IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.759 of 2011 PRASHANT SAHNI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 12/01/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Renewing the prayer for bail in a prosecution under Sections-395, 397 of Indian Penal Code in context of the previous order of rejection with regard to those who are alleged to have identified the petitioner in the Test Identification Parade it is submitted that they did not identify him in the dock during trial. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand)along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.-2, Muzaffarpur in Pear P.S. Case No.-70/2008 (Sessions Trial No.-592/09). KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)