1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4218 OF 2010 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 181 OF 2009 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATED : 23.09.2010 1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the applicant, learned Counsel appearing for revision petitioner and learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.1. This application is filed for seeking direction to the revision petitioner who is respondent No. 6 in this Civil Application to implead the applicant herein as respondent No. 6 to the proceedings in C.R.A. No. 181 of 2009. 2. Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner has no objection to grant this Civil Application. However, counsel appearing for respondent No.1 submits that it is dispute between the revision petitioner - bank and only 2 respondent No.1 and applicant is not necessary party to the proceeding. 3. Perused contents of the application, more particularly para 5 of the Civil Application. Even the statement is made in para 5 that the applicant participated in the auction proceedings along with several others. The applicants offered Rs. 15,57,000/- which was more than upset price. The applicant being the highest bidder, his bid was accepted. It is not in dispute that the dispute is about the same property which the applicant has purchased in the auction. In this view of the matter, I feel it proper that the applicant should be party respondent in the revision petition. Hence, the application is allowed. The revision petitioner to take necessary steps to implead the applicant as added respondent in Civil Revision Application. The Civil Application is disposed of. [S.S. SHINDE,J.] snk/2010/SEP10/ca4218.10