,^w .i^"^^^^^^^^^^?^!^^^^^^^^ M c IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR:^^g|K|— WRIT PETmON T Cri. 1 N0. ^y\/2006 ,' :: . : ; "JSiS PETITIONER RESPONDENTS / >^- ^^....<;^-5 ..^::^-"^.---' ^•"^^r'"'" ....•••"" ••"^••<^--"'" iAi;"". r.-:'"~ '' ^:>''~ ..y""" ^ Jaleshwari Bai Chandrakar wife of late Bhojram Chandrakar, aged about 22 years, resident of vUlage - Agri, P.S. Thankharmia, Tahsil- Saja, District Durg [C.G.], Presently residing at village- Amchok, out post- Dadhi, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg [C.G.]. VERSUS 1] State of Chhattisgarh, through - Superintendent of Police, District - -•2] Jeevan Chandrakar, S/o Sadaram Chandrakar, aged about 49 years, 3] Maidul Mishra, S/o Bisahu Prasad Mishra, aged about 30 years. /4] Thakur Ram, S/o Jeevan Chandrakar, aged about 20 years. 5] Anjani Bai W/o Jeevan Chandrakar, aged about 40 years, No. 2 to 5 are resident of viUage Agrikhurd, P.S. Thankharmia, Tahsil- Saja, District Durg [C.G.]. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^' -O^i 8' <^.i^ cy ^\0^^ <2>« .^ XI-HC-22 3tl^T?iT tewan^T iitiiroflfer i»iiro padma ^^ 3^ '<ll<<lfl<l, OTlltl'ls, Rlcfiyy *11*<WI SBIItft 311^1 ^?)ch,y ^ 7 {\ ^Jp Cc^)b- W-----—WI;ZOflQ,' R<)«A a:n^T?¥Biwflfer 11.12.2006 counlsel Shri Praveen Das, ShM Sanjoy S Ay<»ia\\ State. None for others. Heard. Bhojram Chandrakar (s was registered by thePolice have been prosecuted for case was committed to the respondents no.2 &3 is in have been examined by the been filed stating that statement of eyewitness namj and Sushila, who were aware direct respondent No.l to inv4 When trial is in vogue^, material for just decision of ^l 311 of the Cr.P.C. to Therefore, in such circumstarji With the orforesaid dismissed. durirjg sumnlon circumstartces <*i''ilcf41-f iiidTfftecfl'<Ri^<;i< S|?3rf^T 311^1 for the petitioner. Sovernment Advocate for respondent No.l / (ince deceased) was killed on 11.10.2005. Crime and after investi9ation; respondents No.2 & 3 corjiniitting offence of murder. Undisputedly, the |Court of Sessions and Sessions Trial cgainst v^gue. burirg the trial, a number of witnesses p^osecution. At this juncture, this petition has tiie investigation, Police did not record the i^ly Punaram Mishra and other- witnesses Urmila of all the circumstances, and with a prayer to !nv4stigate the matter in proper manner. j, and trial Court finds evidence of any person |he case, the Court is empowered under Sectioo the person and to record his evidence. i, no further investi9ation is called for. observation, Writ Petition 6734/2006 is Sd/- ('ftt^r)