1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR C.A.W. NO. 1593/10 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 919 OF 2010. M/s. B.B. Lanjewar & another .vs. Collector, State Excise Department, Chandrapur Applicant: Durga Mahila Bachat Gayt. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. A. Parchure, Advocate for applicant, Mr. S.G. Joshi, Advocate for petitioners, Mr. T.R. Kankale, A.G.P. for respondent, CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED : JULY 19, 2010. Application for intervention is allowed to be withdrawn. C.A.W. NO. 1923 OF 2010 : Heard. We do not consider it appropriate to reject this application only on the ground that the impugned order is under Section 142(1) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, particularly when the action was originally taken on the complaint of the applicant. Hence, the C.A. stands allowed. 2 The learned Counsel for the petitioners reserves liberty to take appropriate proceedings in respect of the action of the applicant of preventing the shop from being opened. Judge Judge J.