IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23368 of 2009 ARSHE ALAM @ ARSHE AZAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 14.09.2009 Heard both sides. Looking to the allegation, this court is not persuaded to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. True it is that prosecution and the accused are related to each other, but, considering the materials available on record, this court does not find it to be a good case for extension of privilege of anticipatory bail. Let petitioner, who is said to be the’ Bhagina’ of the injured, surrender and pray for regular bail before the court below which shall be considered and disposed of on its own merit uninfluenced by the present order passed by this court in the present proceeding. The application is, accordingly, disposed of. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)