IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13813 of 2010 Mohinder J Singh Vs. Christian Medical College, Ludhiana Society (Regd.) Ludhiana & others Present: Mr.Arun Jindal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The services of the petitioner were terminated. He accordingly sought a reference of the dispute for adjudication by the Labour Court. The matter was accordingly referred to the Labour Court by the Government. One of the objection raised by the respondent-Management was that the petitioner is not a workman. Labour Court upheld this objection and in this regard made reference to the relevant law and the facts, which were established on record. It was noticed by the Labour Court that the post held by the petitioner fell in group A administration. It is also admitted by the petitioner that number of workmen were working under him and he was recording their confidential reports and assessing their work. He was also asking for explanation of various workmen as directed by the Management. In view of this evidence and material on record, it was found by the Labour Court that the nature of work assigned to the petitioner was not that of a workman, but is that of supervisory nature and accordingly it was found that reference made to the Labour Court was not maintainable. Nothing substantial could be pointed out to find fault with the observations and findings recorded by the Labour Court. Accordingly, no case for interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction is made out. The counsel at this stage prays that the petitioner may be Civil Writ Petition No.13813 of 2010 : 2 : given liberty to have his alternative remedy. In case the petitioner has any remedy under law, he need not seek permission or liberty from the court. The writ petition is dismissed. August 05, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE