IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1433 of 2007 JAGARNATH YADAV @ JAGARNATH JADO, SON OF BANSH ROPAN YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-RAHATHUA, P.S. BRAHRAMPUR, DISTRICT-BUXAR ------- PETITIONER Versus (1) THE STATE OF BIHAR (2) BIDEHI YADAV, SON OF LATE BHUTI YADAV (3) SYAMA YADAV, SON OF MANGARU YADAV (4) SHEO MANGAL YADAV, SON OF BANKA YADAV (5) LALLU YADAV, SON OF BILAS YADAV (6) AKLU YADAV, SON OF BILAS YADAV ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-RAHATHUA, P.S. BRAHMPUR, DISTRICT-BUXAR. ------- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ******* FOR THE PETITIONER- MR. JAGDISH PRASAD NO.1, ADVOCATE MR. VIRENDRA KUMAR, ADVOCATE MR. ASHOK KUMAR VERMA, ADVOCATE FOR THE STATE- MR. LALA KAILASH BIHARI PRASAD ----------------- 02/ 20-10-2008 Heard. This revision by the informant has been preferred against judgment of acquittal recorded by the trial court. After hearing the learned counsel I do not find any perversity in the judgment. The trial court by a well discussed judgment has acquitted the accused persons. No interference is required. This revision is accordingly dismissed. S.Sb/- (M. Saran, J.)