IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17815 of 2009 1. ARCHANA KUMARI W/O KRIPANIDHI KAMAL R/O VILL.- GHOSWARI, P.S.- BAKHTIYARPUR, DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION PATNA 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER BAKHTIYARPUR, DISTT.- PATNA 6. THE AREA EDUCATION OFFICER BARH, DISTT.- PATNA 7. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT GHOSWARI P.S.- BAKHTIYARPUR, DISTT.- PATNA 8. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ GHOSWARI P.S.- BAKHTIYARPUR, DISTT.- PATNA 9. THE HEADMASTER, MADHYA VIDAYALAYA GHOSWARI, P.S.- BAKHTIYARPUR, DISTT.- PATNA ----------- 02/ 16.04.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. Petitioner has come before this Court with a prayer to quash the order contained in Memo No. 1483 dated 30.10.2009 passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Patna. Prayer is also for quashing of order dated 5.5.2005 contained in letter no. 5 issued by Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Ghoswari, whereby the petitioner had been terminated from the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra. Another order which the petitioner has challenged and prayed for its quashing is letter no.4277 dated 11.6.2007 issued by the District Superintendent of - 2 - Education, Patna. The earlier order passed by the Mukhiya and the D.S.E. was challenged by the petitioner by filing C.W.J.C. No. 14891 of 2007 and the petitioner was directed to file appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal has finally passed an order dated 30.10.2009 contained in Memo No. 1483. On perusal of the impugned order passed by the Appellate Tribunal, it transpires that the petitioner’s initial appointment was made on the basis of forged certificate of matriculation. The certificate, which was produced at the time of her initial appointment, was in fact of some other candidate. The tribunal enquired this matter. The report, which has been submitted by Bihar School Examination Board revealed that actual marks obtained by the petitioner was lower than the marks, on the basis of which she got her appointment. In this circumstance, I do not find that petitioner has any case for challenging the order of termination. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)