IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18419 of 1994 Between: G. Gopala Rao, S/o G.V.S. Chalapathi Rao R/o 231, Siripuaram Colony, Malakpet, Hyderabad-36 ..... PETITIONER AND 1.Govt. of A.P.,rep. by Chief Secretary General Admn. Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad 2.Govt. of A.P.,rep. by Secretary Municipal Admn. & Urban Development (TC) Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad 3.Special Officer, Municipal Corpn. of Hyderabad Tank Bund, M.C.H. Complex, Hyderabad 4.Commissioner, Municipal Corpn. of Hyderabad Tank Bund, M.C.H. Complex, Hyderabad 5.The District Collector, Hyderabad 6.Superintending Engineer, Public Heallth Dept. (dismissed) 7.The Addl. Director, Municipal Admn. Dept., Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS (Writ Petition is dismissed as against R6 default vide Court order dt.7-12-1999) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ i) declaring the Sec.212 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act 20/89 as illegal and ultra vires of the Constitution of India ii) declare G.O.Ms.No.439 Municipal Administration and Urban Dev. (TC) M.A. dt: 19-10-90 as illegal and arbitrary iii) declare notifications issued in file No.2363/CTS/F3/91-92 dt: 17-1-93 or other dates in Feb, 98 issued in respect of various wards of the municipal Corporation of Hyderabad as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.L.NARASAIAH (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 7: G.P. for Municipal Admn., and Urban Dev., Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4: MR.K.N.JWALA, SC FOR MCH Counsel for the Respondent No.5: G.P. FOR REVENUE. The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: (PER BN, J) Nobody appears although the case appears under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-appearance and non-prosecution. No costs. -------------------------------- (Bilal Nazki, J) 30TH August, 2004 -------------------------------- (S.Ananda Reddy, J) LUR Copy to: 1. The Chief Secretary Govt. of A.P., General Admn. Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The Secretary , Govt. of A.P., Municipal Admn. & Urban Development (TC) Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad 3.The Special Officer, Municipal Corpn. of Hyderabad Tank Bund, M.C.H. Complex, Hyderabad 4.The Commissioner, Municipal Corpn. of Hyderabad Tank Bund, M.C.H. Complex, Hyderabad 5.The District Collector, Hyderabad 6.The Superintending Engineer, Public Heallth Dept. (dismissed) 7.The Addl. Director, Municipal Admn. Dept., Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad. 8.Two CCs to the G.P. for Municipal Admn., and Urban Dev., High Court Buildings, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 9.Two CD copies.