IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33506 of 2008 PRAMOD DAS @ PRAMOD KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 14.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is accused in a case registered for the offence under sections 498A, 323, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the allegation of marrying the complainant is absolutely false . In fact no marriage ever took place with her as such she is not wife of the petitioner. It is further submitted that if it is true, there ought to have been some materials like photograph etc but the same is not there. It is further submitted that prior to filing of this complaint the petitioner had already filed an informatory petition apprehending his arrest. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that nature and manner of the alleged crime, the petitioner is not entitled for anticipatory bail. Considering the nature of the allegation, I am not inclined to allow this application. Accordingly, the same is rejected. shahid (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)