R.S.A No.919 of 2009 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A No.919 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision : November 26, 2009 Anant Ram, ...... Appellant (s) v. Lal Chand and others, ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the appellant. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This appeal has been filed against concurrent judgments of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the appellant for mandatory injunction directing the respondents to hand over to him possession of the house in dispute. The following questions have been proposed :- “ i) Whether once it is held that the appellant is legal owner of the suit land, then possession should have been delivered to him ? ii) Whether if any document which creates right over R.S.A No.919 of 2009 (O&M) ::2:: the property for the first time requires registration ? iii) Whether the ownership right over the property can be relinquished by way of unregistered document and person can be dispossessed on that basis ?” Both the Courts below have concurrently found on fact that though the house in dispute was possessed by the appellant, yet it was given by him to respondents No.4 and 5 (his wife and son) in lieu of maintenance in proceedings under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C, and that he had also made a statement in this regard in an earlier suit. Counsel for the appellant has not been able to persuade me that these findings are not based on evidence. In these circumstances, the questions proposed do not arise. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. As the main appeal has since been dismissed, all the pending civil miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 26, 2009. JUDGE `kk'