IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17359 of 2009 AMITESH BISHWAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 01.09.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 120(B), 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code on the strength of complaint lodged by the complainant. Allegation as per complaint is that the petitioner became one of the two witnesses of the sale-deed allegedly executed by the wife of the complainant, in favour of Krishna Nand Kumar. It is contended that Krishna Nand Kumar is related to the complainant. Petitioner herein is the grand-son of the complainant. It is contended that co-accused Ganesh Rai who also signed as a witness to the execution of the sale-deed has been granted anticipatory bail under order dated 1.12.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40521 of 2008. Learned counsel submits that the complainant has also filed a Title Suit in order to get rid of the same. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is persuaded to extend the petitioner 2 same privilege. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/ communication of a copy of this order in the court below, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Lalbahadur, J.M. Ist Class, Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 36 of 2008, Trial No. 3960 of 2008 subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. P.K. (K.K. Mandal, J.)