/ Z^T^ / - IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS) N0. ^<<36 /2010 PETCTCONER ^vf. »^%, ^:y '">••••"" RESPONbENTS Shiv Prasad Singh, S/o Shri Murlidhar Singh, aged about 55 years, Forestor, Range Assistant, Puri Range Office, Charama, Forest Division, Kanker (Territorial), Distt. Kanker (C.6.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through :- The Secretary, Forest Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.6.) The Conservator of Forest, Kanker Circle, bistt. Kanker (c.e.) The Divisional Forest Officer, Kanker Division, Distt. Kanker (c.e.) Ranger, ^ange Officer, Charama, Forest Division, Kanker, bisst. Kanker (C.6.) Haldhar Thakur, Forestor, Range Charama, Forest Division, a. i*^.^-.sya:<:^3«MiaaLr Kanker, bistt. Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETCTION UNbER ARTCCLE 226 OF THE CONSTCTUTEON OF INblA. HIOH COURT QFCHHATTISG^ym A^ PETITIONER WRJT PETmON (8)No. 4506 of2010 Shiv Brasad Sto^h. 'g RESPONDENTS VERBUB State ofCMiatrisgarh& Others. 3NSlTimiQN OF INCTA SBs Hon'Me Shri SatfshK. Aeirihotei,J. Present: Shri A.S.MaJputy Advoeate for the petiticmer. Shri Shashasik Th^ur, Panel Lawyer forlfa®State/re^oadcait No. 1 to 4. OKyKR(OKAi^ (Passed on 27" day ofJuno, 2011) 1. Leamed aximel appearing far fhe State^espoade^rt No. 1 to 4 submits fhat Ifae petiticmer has already coatinued at fhe arigifial place ofpostiag for almost 10 monte OQ account ofmterim order granted by this Court 13.08.2010. 'Ibe 8tate/resp<»identN@. 1 to 4 may be granted liberty to pass appropriate orders keepitig m view public mt^est aiid admmistrative ^xigejEiey. Stei tlhakur fufther submite fhat the State/respondent No. 1 to 4 sfaalt tsot iiigtrt upcm ccmpliance of fhe ixnpugned order dated smd 15,07.%)10 (Amiexure P/5) in respectoftiiepetitioner. 2. At fhis stage. when no eftect could be given to tiie impiigne^l wder d^ed 15.07.^)10 (Armexure P/5) on account offhe teterim ©rder dated 13.08.201Q, thus, itis not necessary to go iato legality and validity oflhe afbrestated impugned onlers. 3. In view ofthe above, acco^dmg to leamed coiinsel ajyearmg for the petitioner, notNng suwives m fhis p@titi<m ft)r adjudtcatio». 4. Accordmgly, Ifae petition stands disposed of No ardter asto a>sts. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Anut