"'Wssaaaaa ^ ^ BBFOBE SHB M.P. STA2S ffiMIinSIBJtSITC TEIBWAI. fS'. JABALFOP. (MP), H roi 5t O.A. ApaiGAHES E^POimBICS OF 1997 1 • lyarelal son of Siari Eb-anesbBar Srasad Hisbad, aged a'bo'u-t % years, Helper ia (EM), Irrigation ^ Bepar'fciiai't, Raa.p'ur- (HP'). S. Bholanath. SliuKLa son pf Shri Baachhor SbuKLa, aged abou'fc 36 yeaxs, Workiag as Helper (ESt?) IrAga'tion Bepar'fctasn-tj aaipnr (MP). -?SBSl 1. S-tate of H.P. -tlarongb the Secrs-taiy, Wa-ter ResotD'css Bepartmen'b, Tallabh Bbawan, SHOPAli 2. Saperlntendiag &igineer, B& M Bivision, trrigst.iw Departmea'fc, Bai-pur (MP). 3. Tbe Exeen1a.ve aigiaeer (B & H), Ligh-t MacM-nary Bivision, W.R.B., Baipiir (HP). ,1S •III: su; Sp! N( Ds ! an .. bc ^. 197 n^ A@,IGAIIOH T3SSSS3. SISOEIOH 19 OF THS ADl'IIBISI'BJiIIVE IBIBIIIIAI'S ACS'jl9_85.. ^IK'S Hlfel) BBTAIIS 0V THE APCT.IGffl'IOH. ira •l' ;rv^ t^t /"~^.. /'H? 1. Petitioners Respondents liR! OF iATTti iiLAi Writ Petition No. 1567 of 2005 Pyarelal Nishad, (E&M), 2. of Shri Bhuneshwar Prasad aged about 39 years, Helper In Irrigatlon Department, Raipur sholanath Shukla, son of Shri Banchhor Shui!a,aged about 36 years, working as Helper (E&M) irrigation Department, Raipur (MP). State of M.P. through the Secretarv, Water Resourees Department, Vailabh Bhawan, Bhopai. Superintending Enginser, E&M Division, irrigation Department, Raipur (MP), 'he Exscutive Engineer (E&M), Light Machiner/ Divislon, W.R.D., Raipur (MP). SB: Hon'bie Mr. Satish K. Aanihotri, J. Present: Mr. Prakash Tiwari, Advocate forthe petitioners. Mr. Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel Lawy'er for the respondents No. 2 ' and 3/State. (Passed.on this 19 dayofMarch 2009) Learned counsei appearing for the petitlonsrs submits that the petltioners do not want to contest this matter on merit at this stage. However; the petitioners may be granted iiberty to fiie a representation to the respondent authorities. 2) Mr. Shrivastava, iearned Panei Lawyer appearing for the respondents No. 2 and 3/State fairiy submits that if a representation is made fo th® respondent authorities, the same shail be considered and declded, in accordance with 'Iaw on its own merit. 3) In visw of foregoing, according fo tearned counse! appearing for the pefitioners, nothing sun/ives for adjudication in this petition. 4) Accordlngiy, this petition stands disposed of. Consequentiy, i.A.No.2 also stands disposed of. i—- f , j. _. : SdA , . .- Satish K. Agniilotri