IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 2371 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 2371 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 2371 OF 2007 Kirshnat Maruti Dhanwade .... Petitioner versus Rangrao Dashrath Sarnaik & ors....... Respondent. None for the petitioner Mr.P.D.Dalvi for respondents 1 to 4. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 07TH AUGUST, 2007 DATED; 07TH AUGUST, 2007 DATED; 07TH AUGUST, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner was absent yesterday and hence the matter was kept today. Today as well the counsel was absent. Heard the learned counsel for the respondent. 2. An application was moved for transfer of the appeal, A.O.No.214/05 from Pune Bench to Mumbai. The application was moved mainly on the ground that other connected appeals were transferred to the Bench at Mumbai. The impugned order reveals that all those appeals were transferred as the respondent therein had given consent. In addition to the said ground allegations are also made against the Presiding Officer. The President of Maharashtra State Co-operative Appellate Court has addressed the issue raised in the transfer application and on consideration of the same in proper prospective, has rejected the application. Aggrieved thereby the present writ petition has been filed. 3. Perused the impugned order rejecting the transfer application. The same does not call for any interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Hence writ petition is summarily dismissed. ....