IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** R.F.A.No.795 of 2004 Date of Decision: October 30 , 2008 State of Haryana .....Appellant v. Dalip Singh .....Respondent Coram:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. H.S.Hooda, Advocate General, Haryana with Mr. S.S.Goripuria, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate for the respondent RAJESH BINDAL J. In view of the detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of today passed in RFA No.789 of 2004 titled State of Haryana v. Smt. Chirya the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE October 30, 2008 paramjit IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** R.F.A.No.795 of 2004 Date of Decision: 26.3.2009 State of Haryana .....Appellant v. Dalip Singh .....Respondent Coram:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. H.S.Hooda, Advocate General, Haryana with Mr. S.S.Goripuria, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate for the respondent RAJESH BINDAL J. In view of the detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of today passed in RFA No.789 of 2004 titled State of Haryana v. Smt. Chirya the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 26.3.2009 Reema In RFA No. 795 of 2004 Present:- None. The main case was decided on 30.10.2008. Registry has put up the file with the note that though in the order sheet of this petition cross- objection No. 131-CI of 2004 was shown but the same was not filed in this case and in fact cross objection No. 131-CI of 2004 was filed in RFA No. 796 of 2004 which was rightly shown in that case. It is further noted that the parties name in the order sheet of the present petition were shown as State of Haryana Vs. Amrati instead of State of Haryana Vs. Dalip Singh. In view of the above, the order dated 30.10.2008 passed in the present petition is recalled and a fresh corrected order has been passed in today's date. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 26.3.2009 reema