AB 1947/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. MERUNO Heard Mr. S. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioners and also Mr. B.S . Sinha, learned Addl. P.P., Assam. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the parties, this Court has also perused the relevant case diary produced by the learned Addl. P.P. and the learned Addl. P. has drawn the attention of this Court to the statements rec orded therein, which this Court presumes to be true statements therein. The peti tioners have been shown as accused No. 2 and accused No. 4 in the FIR and the ac cused No. 1 and accused No. 3 had approached this Court in Bail Application No. 968/11 and this Court by an order dated 20.6.11 granted bail to the accused No. 1 and Accused No. 3. I have perused the said order dated 20.6.11 and as per statements recorded in th e CD and the report of Investigating Agency that the house of the informant was completely gutted by fire, however, there is no eye witness to pin-point that th e two petitioners were the persons involved in the burning of the house and vide order dated 20.6.11 the other two co-accused have been enlarged on bail. Considering the facts and nature of the case, this Court is bound to dir ect that the accused persons namely Shajahan Ali and Miss Monowara Begum @ Khatu n be enlarged on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Kalgachia P.S. Case No. 94/11 corresponding to GR Case No. 1117/11 registered under Sectio ns 436/34 IPC by executing a bond of ‘15000/- each and a surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. In this view of the matter, this bail application stands allowed and disposed.