IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 9TH OCTOBER 2007 / 17TH ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 29854 of 2007(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ MRS. N.VIMALAKUMARI, W/O. N.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, AGED 53 YEARS, LECTURER SELECTION GRADE, MAHARAJAS COLLEGE, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.N.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. K.K.T.M. COLLEGE, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.520, K.K.T.M. GOVT. COLLEGE, KODUNGALLUR, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT. 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KODUNGALLOOR. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(c).No.29854 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 9th day of October, 2007 JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this court seeking a direction to the second respondent to dispose of Ext.P1. Ext.P1 is the arbitration case filed by the petitioner. Complaint of the petitioner is that the case is pending for a long period of time. It is stated that the case was posted on various dates and that during the last one year there is no posting also. It is further stated that the petitioner and her counsel several times contacted the second respondent and enquired about posting of the case. I feel that since it is a case of the year 2005, even without notice to the first respondent, the writ petition can be disposed. I heard learned Government Pleader also. The writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and take a decision on Ext.P1 with full opportunity to the parties within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) sv.