S.B. Civil writ petition No. 760/2007 Dr. Rajendra Singh vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order dated 15.2.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.SS Jodha, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Bhati, Asst to AAG. <><><> Learned counsel for the respondent submits that relief has been granted by the respondents to the petitioner vide order 17.3.2007 (Annex.R/4). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this order has been passed in view of the fact of pendency of this writ petition and the order passed in SBCWP No.760/2007 dated 12.2.2007. It will be worthwhile to mention here that by order dated 12.2.2007, the respondents were directed to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of annual grade increment keeping in view that such increment has given to the similarly situated persons. It is clear from the said order dated 12.2.2007 that respondents were directed to consider the case of the petitioner and has not been directed to grant relief. It appears that in pursuance of the order dated 12.2.2007, the respondents themselves have considered the case of the petitioner and found that the petitioner is entitled to the benefit and the same has been conveyed vide order dated 17.3.2007 (Annex.R/4) and order dated 21.3.2007 (Annex.R/4A). Since the respondents themselves have found that the petitioner is entitled to the relief and granted the relief, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous on account of awarding the relief to the petitioner by the respondents. In view of the above, the writ petition of the petitioner is dismissed as having become infructuous. [PRAKASH TATIA], J. cpgoyal/-