IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2008 / 3RD SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 34157 of 2004(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- SABETH @ ELIZABETH GEORGE, W/O.GEROGE, VETTATH PARAMBIL HOUSE, KODAKARA P.O. MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATS, THRISSUR. 4. THE KODAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, KODAKARA. 5. THE SECRETARY, KODAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH. BY ADV. SRI.T.N.MANOJ FOR R5 GOVT. PLEADER SRI. NOBLE MATHEW. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: vkm W.P.(C)No. 34157/04 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 28.2.2003 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER AND OTHER SHOP KEEPERS BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT PANCHAYAT. EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTION NO. 143 DATED 26.3.2003 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 12.2.2004 OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT SENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 1.3.2004 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT SENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 10.2.2004 SENT BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONERS. EXHIBIT P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT.) NO. 3477/04/LSGD DATED THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, 4.10.2004 OF THE LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT (J) DEPARTMENT. EXHIBIT P7 : TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 30.10.2004 OF THE KODAKARA PANCHAYATH. EXHIBIT P8 : TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE MINUTES BOOK. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. vkm KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.34157 of 2004 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 25th July, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner approached this court with certain grievances regarding Exts.P6 and P7 notices. In view of the intervening developments, in case the petitioner has still any grievance left, she may approach the 4th respondent, in which case the grievance will be duly considered by the said respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.34157 of 2004 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 25th July, 2008.