IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.17589 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 28, 2010. Surat Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Veneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the respondent- authorities to hold an inquiry against respondent No.5 who is alleged to have detained the petitioner illegally by refusing to accept the bail bonds in a case under Sections 107/151 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has already made a self-explanatory complaint dated 30.10.2009 (Annexure P-9) before the respondent-authorities but no action appears to have been taken thereupon so far. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, however, without expressing any views on the allegations made, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & C.W.P.No .17589 of 2010 2 3 to take cognizance of the complaint made by the petitioner and redress his grievance by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, preferably within a period of three months, from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. September 28, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE