IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 6904 of 2008 Between: Dhude Peddintlamma @ Dodde Peddintlamma W/o.Rama Rao R/o.Makkinavarigudem village, T.Narasapuram Mandal, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The STate of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Revenue Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, West Godavari District at Eluru. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Eluru, West Godavari District. 4 The Tahsildar, T.Narasapuram Mandal, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in insisting the Petitioner to vacate from the lands of Petitioner of Ac. 0.62 Cents, Ac. 1.90 Cents and Ac. 3.40 Cents respectively covered by Sy.Nos. 454/2, 455/1 and 454/3 of Makkinavarigudem Village as cited in and pursuant to notice dated 25.1.2008 issued by the 4th respondent as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, violative of the provisions of A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 and the rules framed there under and offends articles 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of Ind i aand consequently direct the Respondents not to dispossess the Petitioner from the lands of Petitioner and pass such other orders or order. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 6904 of 2008 Order: Responding to the notice dated 25.01.2008, issued by the 4th respondent, namely the Tahsildar, T. Narasapuram Mandal, West Godavari District, in Form-2, under Rule 3 of the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Rules, 2007, the petitioner states that she submitted her explanation on 26.02.2008 and it is her grievance that without considering her explanation and without passing any final orders thereon, the respondents are trying to evict her from the lands in question. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: The 4th respondent, namely the Tahsildar, T. Narasapuram Mandal, West Godavari District, is directed to consider the explanation submitted by the petitioner pursuant to the show cause notice and pass final orders thereon in accordance with law, if not already passed. Till then, the respondents are directed not to evict the petitioner from the lands in question. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 31.03.2008 Ksr/Nsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KURR}