(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 3564 OF 2008 Khan Sofiya Munir Khan, Age : 29 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. C/o. Office of Talat Urdu Primary School, Gangapur, Taluka : Gangapur, District : Aurangabad. .. Petitioner. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 2. The Director of Education (Primary), Maharashtra State, Pune, Central Building, Pune Station, Pune. 3. The Deputy Director of Education, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad. 4. The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. 5. The Superintendent, Pay Unit (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, Taluka & District : Aurangabad. (2) 6. Talat Shikshan Mandal, Aurangabad, Through its Secretary, Smt. Khan Qutubunnisa, Age : 54 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. C/o. Talat Shikshan Mandal, Kabadipura, Aurangabad, Taluka & District : Aurangabad. 7. Talat Urdu Prathmik Shala, Gangapur, Through its Head Mistress, Gangapur, Taluka : Gangapur, District : Aurangabad. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. D.J. Choudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. D.R. Korde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr. S.V. Shinde, Advocate, for respondent nos.4 and 5. Mr. R.J. Godbole, Advocate, for respondent nos.6 and 7. ........................ CORAM : A.P. DESHPANDE & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY 2010 (3) COURT'S ORDER : 1. By the present Writ Petition, the petitioner, who is working as an Assistant Teacher, has claimed arrears of salary / honorarium for the period commencing from 1st July 2002 to 30th June 2005, as Shikshan Sevak, at the rate of Rs. 3000/- per month. The petitioner has also claimed salary with effect from 1st July 2005 to 30th April 2008 and onwards, as Assistant Teacher, in the pay scale of Rs. 4500-7000. 2. The parties to the dispute, who is petitioner, on the one hand, and the school management, who is respondent nos.6 and 7, on the other hand, have entered into compromise and resolved the dispute fully and completely. The compromise terms duly signed by the petitioner, the respondent nos.6 and 7, and their Advocates is placed on record and a joint prayer is made for disposal of the petition in terms of compromise. The terms of compromise are taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. 3. The petitioner, so also, the Secretary of the Society and the Head Master are present in the court. They admit the consent terms to be true and correct. 4. In that view of the matter, we dispose of the Writ (4) Petition in consent terms titled as "Terms of Compromise". 5. In view of the terms of compromise, we permit the petitioner to withdraw the amount of Rs. 99,960/-, deposited by the respondent nos.6 and 7 in this court, as on 7th January 2010. ( N.D. DESHPANDE ) ( A.P. DESHPANDE ) JUDGE JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp3564