IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7236 of 2010 MANOJ RAUT, S/O Rajendra Raut, resident of Village- Ghogharaha, P.S. Sahiyara, District-Sitamarhi -- Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 09-03-2010 Heard Mr. Pramod Kumar , learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Sahiyara P.S. Case No.96 of 2009 for offences under Sections 395/397 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner while pressing the bail petition submits that in the F.I.R. though some persons were named as accused, petitioner’s name does not figure. However during the subsequent statement of the informant, the petitioner’s name has been figured as one of the dacoits and on this very ground the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a case of false implication. While opposing the prayer for bail, learned State Counsel submits that it is not only the informant who has named this petitioner as one of the accused, but other family members have also named this petitioner. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, I - 2 - am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J)