IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. M-8165 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: August 12, 2011 Hans Raj ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr.B.S.Guliani, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.J.S.Bhullar, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab for respondent – State. Mr.B.S.Jaswal, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) The petitioners by filing this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, have sought quashing of First Information Report (for short 'FIR) No.153 dated November 10th, 2008 (Annexure P1), registered under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') at Police Station Sardulgarh, District Mansa. By order dated May 19th, 2011, Daya Chaudhary, J. directed the parties to appear before the trial Court and the trial Court was directed to record the statements of the parties. In compliance with the same, Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sardulgarh recorded the statements of the parties, whereby, they stated that they have compromised the matter. Compromise-deed (Annexure P2) has also been placed on record. Indeed, the dispute between the parties was of personal nature. In view of this, there should not be any impediment in allowing the parties to compromise the matter. Support to this view can be had from the authority 'Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab' 2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) 429, wherein, Hon'ble Supreme Court has ruled that in such type of cases, where the dispute is of personal nature, Court should ordinarily, accept the compromise. In view of above, petition is accepted. Consequently, FIR No.153 dated November 10th, 2008 (Annexure P1), registered under Section 420 IPC at Police Station Sardulgarh, District Mansa and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed. August 12, 2011 ( NAWAB SINGH ) gian JUDGE