... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT CONTEMPT CONTEMPT PETITION NO.14 OF 2000 PETITION NO.14 OF 2000 PETITION NO.14 OF 2000 Dr. Rohit J. Sheth & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Shri P.M. Pradhan for the Petitioners. Shri R.S.Khadapkar i/ by Shri R.G. Ketkar for the Respondent No.2. Shri N.V.Bandiwadekar for the Respondent Nos.4 and 5. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : MARCH 20, 2007. : MARCH 20, 2007. : MARCH 20, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. Shri Bandiwadekar appearing for the Respondent No.5 has placed on record the communication made to him on 17th March, 2007 by Shri Shahu Chatrapati Shikshan Sanstha. In the said letter it is stated that now the Petitioner No.2 is no longer the in-charge principal and as per the directions of this Court, a selection committee was constituted and as per the report of the selection committee one Dr. S.D.Patil has been appointed as the Principal and his appointment has been duly approved by the university. A copy of the order of appointment of Dr.S.D.Patil is annexed to the letter. The said letter is taken on record and marked "X" for ... 2 ... identification. 2. Considering the said subsequent event and considering the nature of the contempt alleged, I am of the view that no case is made out for taking action against the Respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Accordingly, notice issued to the Respondents is discharged. Contempt Petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE