IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 551 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 05/03/2009 in WP NO : 4505 OF 2009 on the file of the High Court.) Between: P.Achiyamma W/o.Vegalayya R/o.Jayanthi Agraharam Village Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Sub-Registrar, Bheemunipatnam Visakhaptnam District 2 The District Collector, Visakhaptnam Visakhaptnam District 3 State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government Revenue Department, SEcretariat Saifabad, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.D.V.SITARAMAMURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO :551 of 2009 ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 5/3/2009 of the learned single Judge made in Writ Petition No. 4505 of 2009. The appellant is the writ petitioner. She filed the aforementioned writ petition before the learned single Judge challenging the notification dated 20.6.2003 issued by the 3rd respondent in so far as it relates to the land in an extent of Acs. 3.00 situated in Survey No. 70 of Kothavalasa Village, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam. The learned single Judge, by the order impugned in this appeal, disposed of the said writ petition directing that it shall be open to the appellant to approach the 2nd respondent with a representation seeking deletion of the said land from the purview of the said notification and on such application being filed, the 2nd respondent was directed to take necessary steps within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order. Aggrieved, the appellant filed the present appeal. Admittedly, the learned single Judge on noticing the fact that the vendor of the appellant was granted patta under Section 11-A of the Estates Abolition Act over an extent of Acs. 5.70 cents of land situated in Survey No.70 of Kothavalasa Village, passed the impugned order directing the appellant to approach the 2nd respondent with necessary application and on such application being filed, the 2nd respondent was directed to take necessary steps within the time stipulated therein. No exception can be found with the said order of the learned single Judge. The writ appeal is devoid of any merit and it is accordingly dismissed. However, the time granted to the 2nd respondent for taking steps on the application that would be filed by the appellant, as directed by the learned single Judge, is extended by twelve more weeks. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ___________________ T.MEENA KUMARI,J Date: 15th June, 2009 _________________ SANJAY KUMAR,J pnb