IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5002 of 2007 Rajdeo Sah, son of late Gulab Sah. Resident of Village & P.O.- Gahiri, P.S. & Anchal- Nautan, District- West Champaran. .... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Collector, Bettiah, West Champaran. 3. The Additional Collector, Bettiah, West Champaran. 4.The Anchaladhikari, Nautan, West Champaran. 5. Nathuni Paswan, son of late Bhabhichhan Paswan. 6. Chhote Lal Paswan, son of Sumeshwar Paswan. Serial nos.5 and 6 are residing in village & P.O.- Gahiri, P.S. & Anchal- Nautan, District- West Champaran. .... Respondents. ----------- 03- 27.1.2009 Heard Mr. Ram Suhawan Singh for the petitioner, and Mr. Ritesh Kumar, learned assistant counsel to Additional Advocate General No.1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 5.3.2007 (Annexure-1), passed by the learned Additional Collector, West Champaran, Bettiah, in Settlement Appeal Case No.53 of 2005-06 (Nathuni Paswan & others Vs. Rajdeo Sah and others), whereby the appeal preferred by respondent nos.5 and 6 in a representative capacity has been allowed, and the order of the learned L.R.D.C., Bettiah has been set aside. 2 2. The petitioner had filed an application before the learned L.R.D.C., Bettiah, for correction of revenue records. The same was allowed by order dated 27.5.2004 (Annexure-3), passed by the learned D.C.L.R., Bettiah, in Case No.9 of 2004-05. Respondent nos.5 and 6 seeking to represent the villagers preferred appeal which has been allowed by the impugned order, and the order of the learned L.R.D.C. has been set aside. The learned appellate authority has in substance held that the petitioner is trying to set up title with respect to Government lands. In other words, it has been held that the petitioner has set up a false case and the lands in question are in the nature of Ghairmazarua Aam lands. It appears to me that the impugned order cannot be faulted. The writ petition is dismissed. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/