c^ s<^ :R BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P(C) No. \6's% /2010 PETITIONERS /' , / ..' Av/ .^y ^\:4:^py' ^,/¥V 1. Suresh Sharma S/o. Puran, aged about- 60 years, 2. Naim S/o. Babban, aged about- 58 years, 3. Nasim S/o. Amruddin, aged about- 45 years 4. Fazal S/o. Rehman, aged about- 40 years 5. Islam S/o. Babban, aged about- 41 years, All R/o. Village Koiritola, Ward No. 13, Ramanujganj, District- Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1 The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : the Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. The Collector, Surguja at Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.) 3.'' The S.D.0. Ramanujganj, District Surguja (C.G.) 4. 5: The Tahsildar, Ramanujganj, District Surguja (C.G.) Commandant, 12th Battalion, Ramanujganj, District Surguja (C.G.) / 6.' Superintendent of Police, Police District Balrampur, District Surguja (C.G.) 7. Nagar Panchayat Ramanujganj, through- President, at post Ramanujgnaj, District- Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER^ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT KI.ASPUR Smate Bench: Hon'bie Shri Jusfee PrashantKunSar Bflishra Writ Pefition (Cl No. 1S3S t PETiTfONERS RESPQNDENTS Versus Suresh Shama and ofcere. The Stete of Chhaffisgarti and ottieis. Shri A.K. Prasad, counse! for e petitsonera. Miss Sangeeta Mishra, Pane! Lawyer for the State. WRIT PETiTION UNOER ARTiCLE 228 W THE CONSTITUTSON OF iNDIA (07.10.2010) The cH-aitenge in ttils v/rit petition is to ths ordsr Ainexure P/1 by ttie Coitector, Surguja, by which the subject has to tfis 12th Batelisn Chhatfisgarh Amied PoSics Force, Ramanujgani under Pa?t iV, No.2, 5 of Revenue Book Clrcuiar. (2) The petitioners cSalrned to be in possessfon of ttie some of the (and. however th®iand being Govemfnent !and, the pefitionera have no iocus to chaHenge transfer of the iand from one departmsnt of ttie Govemment to the other department or organlzation. (3) The petiSioriere, if they so desires may prefer a representation before the State Govemment which shai! bs in accordance Saw. (4) Accordingiy, the writ dismissed. Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge