AB 3435/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Mr. S. Sarkar, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State-respond ent. Perused the Case Diary. By this application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioners, namely (1) Mst. Saleha Begum and (2)Sri Bakul Sarma, have prayed for pre-arrest bail, in co nnection with Kamalpur P.S. Case No.252/2011, under Section 366(A) IPC. Learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners, has submitted that the petitione r No.1 is the mother of the boy, who has taken the victim girl and the petitione r No.2 is an independent party, who is known to the family of the petitioner No. 1. From the record, it appears that, the son of the petitioner No.1, had forcefully taken away the minor daughter of the informant and married her after converting her to ’Islam’. Having heard the learned counsel for both the parties and considering the materi als collected by the Investigating Officer, I find no sufficient reason, requiri ng custodial interrogation of the petitioners. Accordingly, it is directed that, in the event of arrest of the petitioners afor esaid, in connection with the above mentioned case, they shall be released on ba il of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand)only each, with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, subject to the condition that, the petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer, on or befo re 05.12.2011 and on such other dates as may be so required by the Investigating Officer. It is further provided that the petitioners shall not interfere with t he investigation in any manner. The A.B. Application is disposed of.