Civil Revision No. 6687 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6687 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 03.11.2011 State Bank of India ...Petitioner Versus Ms. Amandeep Chopra ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) Challenge is to the order dated 25.07.2011 passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn) Jalandhar vide which the evidence of the petitioner has been closed by observing that despite several opportunities, plaintiff/petitioner has failed to conclude his evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner/plaintiff could not produce the evidence despite best efforts and could not call Sh. Parveen Mittal, the then Branch Manager, who had been posted to Corporate Office Bombay who had sanctioned the loan. He has further stated that it has transpired that Sh. Satish Kumar, who is posted SMECC, Jalandhar had executed the loan documents can also depose on behalf of the bank. Learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff has further submitted that the case is now fixed for 09.11.2011 for the respondent's evidence and he may kindly be granted one opportunity to lead the evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff has submitted that due to unavoidable circumstances, he could not produce Mr. Satish Kumar, SMECC, Civil Revision No. 6687 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Jalandhar as a witness at that time. In view of the above, order dated 25.07.2011 passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn) Jalandhar is set aside. Plaintiff is granted one opportunity to produce Sh. Satish Kumar as witness. Accordingly, civil revision is allowed with costs of ` 5,000/-. November 03, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) G.Arora JUDGE