IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3184 of 2008 PARMOD KUMAR VERMA SON OF SRI RAJENDRA PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAI MANNER, P.O. SONMAI, P.S. DHANARUA, DISTRICT PATNA, PRESENTLY RESIDES AT THE HOUSE OF SRI RAMDEO PRASAD, POST MASTER, MOHALLA – SANT NAGAR PARWALPUR, P.O. AND P.S. PARWALPUR, DISTRICT NALANDA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI ANUPAM KUMAR THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NALANDA AT BIHAR SHARIF. 3. SRI MONAL KUMAR THE NAZARAT DEPUTY COLLECTOR ESTABLISHMENT NALANDA AT BIHAR SHARIF. ----------- 02. 13.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The allegation of the petitioner is of non- compliance of the order dated 26.11.2002 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 9978 of 2002 as contained in Annexure- 1, whereby this court while disposing of the writ application, directed the parties to prepare the panel for selection on merits every year with further observations/directions that pursuant to fresh advertisement, in case the petitioner applies for his selection and the vacancy occurs, his case should be considered for appointment following the direction of this court passed in C.W.J.C. No. 222 of 1995 as referred in the order of this court as contained in Annexure- 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner did apply pursuant to the advertisement 2 which was issued in the year 2003. However, since no action was being taken, the petitioner filed another writ application vide C.W.J.C. No. 12417 of 2006 which was disposed of by order dated 27.08.2007 directing the authorities to proceed and choose to abandon the selection process then they must assign reasons for abandoning the selection process. Even this direction was not followed and as such, petitioner filed the contempt application vide M.J.C. No. 33 of 2008 which was disposed of by order dated 16.04.2008 considering the memo no. 498 dated 31st of March 2008. Learned counsel for the State submits that in view of the aforesaid orders of this court as contained in Annexures - 16 and 6, the present contempt application for the alleged violation of the order dated 26.11.2002 does not survive. Considering the rival submission of the parties and in view of the direction of this court as contained in Annexure- 1 read with the order dated 27.08.2007 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 12417 of 2007 as also coupled with the order dated 16.04.2008 vide M.J.C. No. 33 of 2008, I do not find any merit in this Contempt application, the same is accordingly dismissed. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)