p?^ el".' i^^^'SW ;^l';?'l':i"|.2.^"^:s""""" <)^-^ C{F\€^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR Writ Petition(S) No. ^0?> /2008 Petitioner / Narendra Kumar Sharraa aged about 46 years, Shri B.L. Sharma,R/o Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation, Janjgir (C.G.) Permanent Address, C-5/ 16, Mahananda Nagar, UjjainfM.P.) Versus Respondents ^<,.<^ ^w!^,.^^!r ^ ../^-'^ - ^'/s^r fy/' ^^-7\^ Union Of India through Secretary, Personnel and Training Department New Delhi, State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Food and Civil Supplies and consuraer Protection Department D. K.S. Bhawan Raipur , . Sta.teofMadhyaPradesh,State of : Chhattisgarh through Secretary Food and Civil Supplies and cohsumer Pro tection Department, Vallabh Bhavan, Bhopal. M.P. The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation, Sector,-!, C/28, Devendra Nagar,Raipur The MaaagingDirector,Madhya Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation, Prayavaran Bhavan Block No. 1, 3 rd Floor, BhopalM.P. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA \ 5. )Maf HIGH eOUB'EQE GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETmQNfSV No.69G8Qf2008 PETmQNER : Narendra Kuinar Shamia. VERSUS: ::::'::. :';'; .: . .^ RESPONDENTS : Union aflndia& O&ers. WRTT PETmONU]SrDER:AR31CI^226©FTHECONSTirUTIONQFINDIA SB: Honyble Shri SatishK. Asniliotri.J. Present: S&riParagKQtedia>A4vocatefbFthepeti^ • SMKayufShakeel;Ariw)eatefQrtfaer®spN Slm P.K.Bhatfairi; Panet-I^iwyer ^the^^^S^ No.2. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava.AdYQcatefOTtherespondentNb. 3^^ Shrt SameeTBehar,^dyocateinrtherespQhdeiitN6. 4. ORDERfQRAD (Passed on 21st day of April, 2010) Leamed coimsel appearmg for the petitioner submifs thaf pursuant to the order dated 25.01.2007 (AtmexureP/4)passed by the GQVemment of India, Ministry af Home Affairs, the services of llie petitioner was allocatedtotheStateofMatfflyaPradesh.DespitetheQrderpassed^^^b^ the G<wenmieHtofIndta,as;prQvided^^^^ Pradesh Reorgamsatica Ax^, 2QG0?^F s/^^ 2000'), as Ihe Centi^ Govemment is empQwered t6 pass an urder of^allocation between fhe State of Madh^Pradesh and State of Chhattis^rh, on creation ofState crf ehhattisgarh pursuaut t&the pr^sicms o£tte^ 0, the petitioflBr has notteeu relieved by tfae respondent No. 4 to M.P. Stata Ciyil Supplies CoiporatiQti. Shri Sameer Behar, leamed eounsel appeanngfbrthe respoudentNo. subnuts that in view ofthe pendency ofa^ departtnental enquiry against the petitioner, the petitioner eould not be reli^ed finm his [^sttojoin jy 4. at Madhya Pradestl State Givil Supplies Coqioratum Lumted;^pursuatit tothe allocation order. • Shri Kotecha further submits that one similarly situated person namely M.P.Malviya, against whom a departtnerital ehquiry pending, has been relieved to joiri at Madhya Pradesh State Givil Supplies Corporation Ltd, pursuant fo fhe order of aUocation passed l^ ithe Gentral Govemment,on 05.04.2008 (AnnexureP/8). . Ohce the allocationorderhasbeehp^sed,lheTeisnottunginlawwhich authorizes one Corporatibri to withhold the seryices ofan employee who llasbeenallocated tooitherState. ; The contentiori of leai-ned eounsel appearmg for tfae respondent No. 4 is wifhout any basis. If a departmental eriquiry is pending, that may continue even ifthe^ietitioner is alloeated to OF posted iii tiie State of Madhya Pradesh. That cannot come m the way of executioin oftfae allQcati(mpf1heservicespfthepetitiQnei,Fur^ bythe Ck)vemmentdfIadia,dated!i23^1500^(Amiexu P^ Accordmgly, the respQndeiit No; •4; is direoted to relieve the petitioner fQrthv^toJomhisnewplaeeofpc^ng.Itismade^^^ departmental enquiry is pending agamst the pefitioner, fhe samesmay confmue iCTespective ofthe fact wheAerthe petitioneris worlu^ Ae Chhattisgarh State Civit Supplies Gorporation Ltd. or the Madhya Pradesh State Civil ISupplies CQrporatioa Ltd. Consequently,the writ petitionis allowed. No orderasto eosts.^r' 3.^5e^ l.;i»,...s.i8i>ta6