- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION CRIMINAL REVISION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.602 OF 2008, APPLICATION NO.602 OF 2008, APPLICATION NO.602 OF 2008, CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.603 OF 2008 REVISION APPLICATION NO.603 OF 2008 REVISION APPLICATION NO.603 OF 2008 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. None for the applicant Ms M.H.Mhatre A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 20,2009 : APRIL 20,2009 : APRIL 20,2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. None for the applicant. The applicant is the original complainant in a complaint filed under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,1881. The learned Magistrate convicted the respondent accused. In an appeal preferred by the accused, the Sessions Court has passed an order of acquittal. Hence, the present revision application is not maintainable as other statutory remedy is available to the applicant. 2. Revision application is accordingly dismissed. However, it will be open for the applicant to adopt statutory remedy notwithstanding the dismissal of the revision application. - 2 - JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE