C.W.P. No. 21313 of 2011 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 21313 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: 17.11.2011 Binder ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mrs. Sushma Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. The claim of the petitioner in the present petition is for quashing of selection of respondent No.4, who has been appointed on the post of Sewadar, whereas, the petitioner, who is working with the present Department for the last more than two and a half years, has not been considered. It is the argument of learned counsel for the petitioner that although the order has not been passed and inspite of submission of legal notice, orally the petitioner has been told that the petitioner being over aged has not been considered for selection. Learned counsel also submits that since the petitioner belongs to Scheduled Caste category, he is entitled for relaxation of the age for a period of five years, in view of the advertisement and the petitioner cannot be said to be over age. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case directions are issued to decide the legal notice (Annexure P-3) served upon the respondents. C.W.P. No. 21313 of 2011 (2) In view of the limited prayer of the petitioner and without commenting anything on the merits of the case at this stage, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the legal notice and pass necessary order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of the order. Disposed of accordingly. November 17, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE