IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1931 LA.App..No. 1292 of 2007(C) -------------------------------- LAR.24/1994 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR ADDL.LA UNIT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT/RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------- 1. FATHIMA BEEGUM, SHINE TPWVH NO.381, KARIMBAM P.O., TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DIST. 2. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TRIDA. ADV. SRI.BABU CHERUKARA FOR R1 SRI.P.SUKUMARAN NAIR FOR R1 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/11/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ L. A. A. No.1292 of 2007 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J Having gone through the impugned judgment, we are of the view that the learned Subordinate Judge was justified in placing reliance on Ext.A3 judgment. It is now brought to our notice that Ext.A3 judgment has attained finality in the sense that L.A.A.308/07 preferred by the Government against Ext.A3 was dismissed. We also notice that the property is in Vanchiyoor village and was situated in a very important area of Thiruvananthapuram Corporation. For all these reasons, we are not inclined to entertain L. A. A. No.1292 of 2007 -2- this appeal. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE K. SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE kns/-