THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2597 OF 2010 DT.30.07.2010 Between: Ginjupalli Jaya Lakshmi ………………Petitioner Vs. Kandula Krishna Kumari ……………..Respondent O R D E R: The petitioner/defendant filed this revision petition seeking to assail the correctness of the order dated 27.04.2010 passed in I.A.No.196 of 2010 in O.S.No.405 of 2009 on the file of V Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur. The court below dismissed the said application filed by the petitioner under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, read with Section 151 of C.P.C., wherein it was sought to send the documents to the Government Handwriting Expert for comparison, to establish the fact that the petitioner/defendant did not execute Exs.A-1 and A-2 and also to find out that they are tampered documents. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. There is no representation on behalf of the respondent. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the material placed before this court, it is seen that trial in the suit has not yet been completed. The petitioner has to establish prima facie case as set forth in the pleadings, without which, she cannot make any exercise under Section 45 of the Act and on an earlier occasion, this court already expressed the said view in a similar matter of this nature. Hence, I am of the view that the trial court has rightly dismissed the application filed by the petitioner. I see no merit in the revision petition. The revision petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________ B.PRAKASH RAO J., Dt.30.07.2010 tjs