i/ @ \/ w \0" $m€ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIseARH AT BILAsPUR (c.6.) w.P.’ s No. 7 $77.3’ /2011 / PETITIONER : Sm’r. Mam’m Mishra & Mamfa Tripafhi, W/o Shri Suresh Mishr‘a, Aged about 44 year's, Lecfurer‘, 'Governmenf Higher Secondary School Baimanagoi, Bilha Disf’r. Bilaspur' (C.G.) ,3 VER$U5 Sfafe of Chhaf‘risgar‘h Through Secre’rar'y, School Education Depari’men’r D.Kc5. Bhawan, Raipur' (6.6.) RESPONDENTS : 2. / Districf Education Officer Bilaspur' (6.6.) 3. ('Che Principle Governmenf Higher Secondary School, Baimanagoi, Dis’r‘r. Bilaspur (C.G.) V, 4. Joinf Direcfor, Treasury Accounf & Pension Bilaspur Dis’rt Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSUTUTION OF INDIA The pefifioner named above mosf respecffully begs To submit as under:- IEVV" i a; a HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER W.P.(S).NO. 7545/2011 Shri K.S‘Pawar, counsel far the petitioner. Shri A.V‘Shridhar, P.L. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTTON OF INDIA ORDER (13.12.2011) Grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that though s he is entitled to receive two advance increments pursuant to passing of BEd course, the same has not been granted to her. Counsel for the petitioner submits that his case is squarely covered with number of decisions passed by this Court inciuding the one in the matter of Asha Saxena Vs. State of M.P. & Others, 2009 (III) MPJR (SC) 59 (Annexure P/ 5); He submitsithat in View of this judgment besides many others, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation before respondent No.3, raising all his grievances. Counsel for the petitioner also craves for a direction to the competent authority to decide the said representation as expeditiousiy as possible. Counsel for the State also assures that representation if any made by the petitioner, shall be decided in accordance With law, as early as possible. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. However, if the petitioner makes a representation within one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the competent authority shall decide the same within a further period of two months from the date of its receipt in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. ’ m~ Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge PETXTIONER Smt. Mamta Mishra VCI‘SUS RESPONDENTs Stam of Chhattisgarh 85 Others