IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 31210 of 2011(A) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. SUSEELAN, S/O. RAGHAVAN NAIR, AGED 37, MAZHUVANNOOR VILLAGE, MANGATTUPUTHANARAMBU HOUSE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, NELLAD KARA, NELLAD P.O.-686 721. 2. KUTTAPPAN, S/O. RAMAN KUNJI, AGED 58, MELAPPILLY HOUSE, MAZHUVANNOOR VILLAGE, MAZHUVANOOR P.O., PIN-686 689. BY ADVS. SRI.G.KRISHNAKUMAR, SMT.PRIYA SHENOY (KOCHI), SRI.TITTO THOMAS, SRI.K.A.ANI JOSEPH. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM-682 030. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA-686 661. 3. THANKAMANI, D/O. KESHAVAN NAIR, MANGATT HOUSE, NELLAD KARA, MAZHUVANNOOR VILLAGE, PIN-686 689. R1 & R2 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.31210/2011 A APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DTD.24.5.11 OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF COMMISSION REPORT DTD.NIL IN IA NO.1201/2011 IN OS NO.122/11 FILED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD.25.7.2011. EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DTD.18.8.11 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DTD.17.10.11 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.14.11.2011 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT BY PETITIONERS. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 31210 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 23th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Proceedings under Act 28 of 2008 were initiated against the petitioners and Ext.P5 is the show cause notice issued by the first respondent. On receipt of show cause notice they have filed Ext.P6 reply. Further proceedings are not finalized so far. It is in these circumstances this writ petition is filed. 2. Since the proceedings under Act 28 of 2008 have been initiated and as the first respondent is the statutory authority to deal with the same, I dispose of the writ petition directing the first respondent to consider the case against the petitioners in the light of Ext.P6 reply. This shall be done by the first respondent with notice to the parties and orders shall be passed within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-