IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2010 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 37140 of 2010(N) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. GOPI, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.KUMARAN, VAKKATT, WARD NO.3, KUMBALANGHI PANCHAYATH, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. SANTHOSH, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.RAJU, VALIYAPARAMBIL, WARD NO.3, KUMBALANGHI PANCHAYATH, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.ASHIK K.MOHAMMED ALI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI, KOCHI-682501. 2. KUMBALANGHI GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KUMBALANGHI REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-682506. 3. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, REGIONAL OFFICE, GANDHI NAGAR, KOCHI-682020, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER. 4. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682011. 5. SENSON, S/O.ANTONY, ATTIPETTI VEETTIL, WARD NO.3, KUMBALANGHI PANCHAYATH, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, 682506. R1 & R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH KUMAR R3 BY ADV. SRI. M.K. CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SC FOR PCB. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 37140 of 2010 N ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 14th day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioners state that making allegations of pollution against the fifth respondent, they have filed a complaint before respondents 2 and 3. It is alleging that the complaint is not acted upon, this writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, complaints have been received by respondents 2 and 3, necessarily it is for them to take action on the complaints. Therefore, I direct that on the production of a copy of this judgment, if any complaint has been received from the petitioners, respondents 2 and 3 shall enquire into the same with notice to the fifth respondent and take appropriate action in the matter. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the allegations raised. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks