IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 25694 of 2011(J) ------------------------ PETITIONER : --------------------- M.A. SYEDKUTTY, S/O. ABDUL RAHIMAN, AGED 53, KARITHALAPARAMBU, C.O. UMMER ROAD, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI SRI.BENHUR JOSEPH MANAYANI SRI.JEEVAN MATHEW MANAYANI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. COCHIN CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION COMPLEX, ERNAKULAM - 682 011. 2. COCHIN CORPORATION COUNCIL, REP. BY ITS MAYOR, CORPORATION COMPLEX, ERNAKULAM - 682 011. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TO LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.V.JOSHI, SC, R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. E.K. ABDUL KHADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 25694 of 2011(J) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 8.9.2010 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 24.1.2011. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. 3586 OF 2011 DATED 3.2.2011. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 29.6.2011. EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 7.7.2011. EXT.P6 : COPY OF THE PETITION WITH THE SIGNATURES OF LOCAL DIGNITARIES DATED 8.7.2011. EXT.P7 : COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 8.9.2010. EXT.P8 : COPY OF THE AGENDA DATED 10.10.2011 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................. W.P.(C).NO.25694 OF 2011 ............................................. Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2011. JUDGMENT The grievance of the petitioner is in respect of the inaction on the part of the respondent Corporation in giving effect to Ext.P4 order passed by the first respondent, pursuant to a direction given by this Court as per the judgment in W.P.(C).No.3586/2011. 2. The respondent Corporation has filed a counter affidavit pointing out the facts and figures and also as to the action taken pursuant to Ext.P4. 3. When the matter is taken up for further consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a copy of the resolution/order passed by the Corporation pursuant to Ext.P4 has already been handed over and that the petitioner would like to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to pursue the matter further by pursuing other appropriate remedy. In the said circumstances, permission is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. cl