IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Arbitration Petition No. 20 of 2007 M/s Goel Motors ……. Petitioner Versus Manjul Awasthi and another ……. Respondents …….. Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manoj Sah, Mr. Rajeev Singh & Seema Sirohi, Advocates for the respondents. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the respondents that Mr. Manjul Awasthi, Sole Arbitrator – respondent no. 1 herein has passed the Arbitral Award on 17.10.2008 rendering this petition infructuous. Mr. H.M. Bhatia, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that because of the aforesaid statement coming form the learned counsel for the respondents about passing of the Arbitral Award by respondent no. 1, this petition, now, has become infructuous and seeks the leave of this Court to withdraw the same with liberty to the petitioner to avail of all remedies available to it including the remedy of challenging the aforesaid Arbitral Award in appropriate proceedings. Prayer allowed. The petitioner is given the liberty as prayed for. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 16.12.2008 A