IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42777 of 2008 MANTU CHOUDHARI @ PRAMOD CHOUDHARI, son of Late Ram Prawesh Choudhari, resident of village Pharidpur, P.S. Daniyama, District Patna ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite party ----------- 03/ 18.2.2009 Present is the case of train dacoity. Antecedent of the petitioner is not clean, as he has been remanded in the present case from another case of train dacoity. Superintendent of Police, Rail, Patna has stated in his letter dated 13.11.2008 that prosecution witnesses are located in the district of Patna, Jehanabad, Begusarai and Nalanda and desires one year time to conclude the trial. In the circumstances, at this stage, I am not inclined to admit the petitioner to the privilege of bail. This application is, accordingly, rejected. However, the Superintendent of Police, Rail, Patna and the Officer-in-charge, Bakhtiyarpur (Fathuah) Rail Police Station are directed to produce the witnesses and the trial court is directed to conclude the trial within one year as indicated in letter dated 13.11.2008. Let this order be communicated to the trial court (A.D.J. III, Barh), the Superintendent of Police, Rail, Patna and the Officer-in-charge, Bakhtiyarpur (Fathuah) Rail Police Station in connection with S.T. No. 1111 of 2007, arising out of Bakhtiyarpur (Fathuah) P.S. Case No. 13 of 2006 by the office of this Court through fax. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.) 2