IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8491 of 2009 CHANDESHWAR MAHTO, SON OF LATE RAM YES MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MAHMUD, POLICE STATION AHIYAPUR, DISTRICT – MUZAFFARPUR. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 10.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. The offence alleged is under Sections 304(B) 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that petitioner is father-in-law who is in custody since 26.06.2003 as stated in paragraph- 7 of the petition. It is further submitted that a report was called for, regarding status of the case, from perusal of which it appears that three defence witnesses have already been examined and statement of accused persons under Section 313 Cr.P.C. was recorded on 07.12.2006. After hearing argument, the case fixed for judgment on 29.09.2008, but the judgment could not be passed on that date because the I.O. and the Doctor were not examined. Summons has already been issued on I.O. vide report of the trial court submitted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur by letter dated 20th of May 2009 (Flag – “F”). Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10.000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the 2 like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in Sessions Trial No. 290 of 2004 in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 149 of 2001. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)