IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Commercial Tax Revision No.36 of 2009 M/s Tyagi Gur Khandsari Udhyog ....Revisionist Versus The Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Dehradun ...Respondent Mr. Pulak Raj Mullick, Advocate present for the revisionist. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel present for the respondent. Coram: Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Prafulla C. Pant, J. (Oral) Heard learned counsel for the parties. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the impugned order dated 5th June, 2009 passed by Commercial Tax Tribunal, Uttarakhand, Dehradun (assessment year 1992-93 Provincial), we do not find any question of law involved in this revision. Even the questions suggested in the memorandum of revision are related to the factual aspect. The Tribunal and authorities below have applied their mind and given concurrent finding while passing the order impugned. 2 In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, this revision is dismissed summarily. (Stay Application No.8198 of 2009 stands rejected). (V.K.Bist, J.) (P.C. Pant, J.) 18.09.2009 Arti 3