Cr.Appln./1862/2011 & Anr 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1862 OF 2011 1.Raibhan Bhausaheb Korde, Age 56 years, Occ. Agriculture and Government Service, 2.Prayagabai @ Gayabai Raibhan Korde, Age 50 Years, Occupation Household, 3.Jagannath Bhausaheb Korde Age 52 years, Occ. Agriculture, 4.Radhakrishana @ Radhakisan Bhausaheb Korde, Age 52 years, Occupation Agriculture, 5.Babasaheb @ Dnyaneshwar Raibhan Korde, Age 30 years, Occupation Agriculture, 6.Jagnath/Jaideep @ Nana Raibhan Korde, Age 26 years, Occupation Agriculture, 7.Ravindra Janardhan Waghmare Age 25 years, Occ.Agriculture, All residents of Khedale Kajali, Tq.Newasa, Dist. Ahmednagar ..Applicants VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra 2. The Superintendent of Police, Ahmednagar 3.Ambadas Madhav Korde Age 56 years, Occ.Agriculture, r/o Khedle Kajali, Taluka Newasa, Dist. Ahmednagar. ..Respondents akl Cr.Appln./1862/2011 & Anr 2 ... Shri K.N.Lokhande, Advocate for applicants Shri N.B.Patil, APP for respondents 1 & 2 and Shri S.T.Veer, Advocate for respondent 3. ... WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2067 OF 2011 1. Ambadas Madhav Korde, Age 65 years, Occ.Agriculture, R/o Khedle Kajali, Tq.Newasa, Dist. Ahmednagar. 2.Bharat Ambadas Korde Age 38 years, Occ.Agriculture, R/o Khedle Kajali, Tq.Newasa, Dist. Ahmednagar. 3.Ravindra Ambadas Korde Age 34 years, Occ.Agriculture, R/o Khedle Kajali, Tq.Newasa, Dist. Ahmednagar. 4.Asaram Raybhan Dhage Age 45 years, Occ.Agriculture, R/o Khedle Kajali, Tq.Newasa, Dist. Ahmednagar. ..Applicants VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra Through Newasa Police Station, Tq. Newasa, Dist.Ahmednagar. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Ahmednagar 3.Raibhan Bhausaheb Korde, Age 56 years, Occ.Service, R/o Khedle Kajali, Tq.Newasa, Dist. Ahmednagar. ..Respondents ... Shri S.T.Veer, Advocate for applicants Shri N.B.Patil, APP for respondents 1 & 2 and Shri K.N.Lokhande, Advocate for respondent 3. ... akl Cr.Appln./1862/2011 & Anr 3 CORAM : A. H. JOSHI & A. R. JOSHI, JJ. Dated: October 07, 2011 ORAL JUDGMENT:(Per A.H.Joshi,J.):- 1. Parties, represented by Advocates, are present. 2. Heard respective Advocates. 3. Rule. 4. By consent, Rule made returnable forthwith 5. In both the cases, the parties, which are adversary to one another, have filed affidavits stating that they are inter se related and they do not wish to continue with the controversy and dispute. They have shown their desire for withdrawing the complaints filed by them against each others. 6. Parties, who are present in the Court are identified by respective Advocates. 7. We, therefore, make Rule absolute in both the akl Cr.Appln./1862/2011 & Anr 4 applications, as follows:- (a) The first information report bearing No.I-23 of 2011, dated 2.2.2011 registered by respondent No.3 in Criminal Application No. 1862 of 2011 against the applicants in the said application, with Newasa Police Station, Newasa, District Ahmednagar, stands quashed and set aside. Consequently, R.T.C.No.155 of 2011 pending before the Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Newasa, District Ahmednagar also stands quashed and set aside. (b) The first information report bearing No. I-24/2011, dated 2.2.2011, registered by respondent No.3 in Criminal Application No. 2067 of 2011, against the applicants in the said application, with Newasa Police Station, Newasa, District Ahmednagar stands quashed and set aside. Consequently, R.T.C.No.236 of 2011 pending before the Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Newasa, District Ahmednagar also stands quashed and set aside. (c) Bail bonds of the accused, in both the cases, stand cancelled. ( A. R. JOSHI, J. ) ( A. H. JOSHI, J. ) ... akl