^ COURT OPCHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. (SS No. 6960 of 2007 PBTITIONER Hem.charaa Chaadi'a, S/o Shri Nauld Ram Chandi-a, aged about 44 years, Assistaat Teacher Govemineut Boys Priinary School Risda, Disti-ict Koiba (C.G.) Versus 1 State of Cllhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, School Education Departcaeat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipm- (C.G.) 2 The Director, PubMc Instruction Departuient, Raipur(C.G.) 3. Assistaitt ComTinssioner, Tribal & Welfare Department, Korba (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Korba, District Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION Appearauce: Shri K.S. Pawar, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Paxiel Lawyer for fhe State on advaace copy. (22.11.2007$ SUNIL KUMAR 8INHA, <J Heard. . Leamed counsel for fhe petitioner subinits that fhe issue iavolved ia fhe case is as to whefher fhe petitioner is entitied to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date oftaitial appoiatmeut or froni fhe date of coinpletion of probation period. He subniits fhatthe issue iuvolved bereia was considered by fhe Madhya Pradesh State Admiaistrative Tribunal, Jabalpur ia O.A. No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 otfaers Vs. State of M.P. and ofhers'), ^- wherein, it was held that the sinularly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. fh.e date of uiitial appointment. The matter was taken up to fhe Hon'ble Supreme Court iu Special Leave Petition (Civfl) No.6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'ble Suprenie Court upholding the decision of the Tribiuial to the effect fhat fhe Teachers/Assistaat Teachers are entiUed to regular pay scale froiu the date of initial appointm.ent. 'Shyna W;P.(S>No. 6960 of2007 Leamed counsel for the petitioner furfher suhiuits fhat this Cqurt, while considertng the same issue ia Ram Kumar Sahu and ofhers Vs. State Govt. ,of Clihattisgarh aad another (W.P.(S) No.813 of 2007) by order dated 12.2.2007, has granted regular pay scalew.e.f. fhe date ofitutial appointinent. Learaed counsel for fhe parties jointly subiuits fliat fhis case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court ia the case of Ram Kumar Sahu and £motlier(supra). In view offhat, fhis petition is aUowed in the saine tenas. However, this oider shafl besubject to all veritications made by fhe State regarding facts pleaded ia the petition. s^^ft «,n1ftlv*'3ttA6e • "D ^