IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 854 of 2011 Date of decision: 13.5.2011 Rajinder … Petitioner versus Union of India and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. R.A.Sheoran, Advocate, for the petitioner ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner is aggrieved with order dated 20.2.2010 passed by the Additional District Judge, Hisar, by virtue of which his execution petition claiming arrears of the compensation awarded of his acquired land, has been dismissed for want of evidence. Counsel for the petitioner contends that with the intervention of the Court, petitioner was awarded enhanced compensation amount for which he could not lead evidence and as such, he seeks one more opportunity for the said purpose. Heard. Rules and procedure are hand-maid of justice and are meant for enhancing the same and not to scuttle it. Keeping in view the fact that the dispute between the parties is required to be disposed of on merits and not on the basis of technicalities, the present revision petition is allowed and the order under challenge is set aside. The executing Court is directed to afford an opportunity to the petitioner to conclude his evidence. C.R. No. 854 of 2011 -2- Keeping in view the circumstances mentioned above, this revision is being disposed of without issuing any notice to the opposite party. If the respondents are summoned to contest this litigation, they will have to incur huge expenses to defend this case besides causing unnecessary burden to the public exchequer. However, liberty is granted to the respondents that if they feel dissatisfied with this order, they may move an application to recall the same. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. May 13, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE