IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9683 of 2009 Kalika Prasad, S/o Late Sheo Dhari Sah, R/o Village Jude-Bharashra, P.S. Bihiya, District Bhojpur……………………………………………………………..…..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Principal Secretary, Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 4. District Magistrate, Buxar, District Buxar. 5. District Education Officer, Buxar, District- Buxar 6. District Superintendent of Education, Buxar, District-Buxar. 7. Block Development Officer, Rajpur Block, District -Buxar 8. Block Education Extension Officer-cum- Secretary, Prakhand Sikshak Niyojan Samiti, Rajpur, District Buxar. 9. Panchayat Sachiv, Rajpur Panchayat under Rajpur Block in the District of Buxar. 10. Secretary, District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Buxar. 11. The Bihar School Examination Board through its Secretary, Sinha Library Road, Patna…………………………………………………………………...Respondents ----------- 3 20.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. By order dated 20.03.2009 passed by the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Buxar as contained in Annexure-7, appeal of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that the name of the Institution was not mentioned in the C.D. to show that the Institution from which appellant claimed to have completed teachers training course and passed teachers’ training examination, was recognized at the relevant 2 time. It is mentioned in the order that the appellant had not produced any proof that the Institution was recognized at that time. The appellant-petitioner has filed this writ application challenging the said order. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the certificate of teachers training was issued to the appellant-petitioner by the Bihar School Examination Board itself in which the name of the Institution is mentioned. Hence it could well be presumed that the Institution was recognized at that time. In addition to that, petitioner has also produced a notification of the Government dated 21.11. 2006 as contained in Annexure-5 wherein the Institution has been shown as recognized for sessions 1980-81 to 1985-86 and 1986-87 to 1993- 94. Petitioner claimed that he had completed his teachers training course from the said Institution in sessions 1982-83 and had passed the examination in 1991. If this document is accepted to be correct, obviously petitioner had completed teachers’ training course from the Institution during which period the Institution was recognized. However, it is admitted that the 3 Government letter dated 21.11.2006 was not produced before the appellate authority. In the circumstances, this Court feels it appropriate that the Appellate Authority should consider the matter afresh in the light of the said letter of the Government bearing no.1290 dated 21.11.2006. The order of the Appellate Authority dated 20.03.2009 is, therefore, quashed. The matter is remitted back to the Appellate Authority to consider the said Government letter and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law positively within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application is allowed with the aforesaid observations and directions. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)