'^ Petitioner Respondents HIGH ©OURTOF CHHATTtSGAIW: BIIASPUR Writ Petition No. 2313 of 2084 Dr. Satish CharKlra Suri, S/o. Late S.L Suri, Aged about 62 yeare, R/o. R-6, Vinofaa Nagar, Bitaspur (CG). Versus 1) Ac<X)untant Qenerat of Chhatttsgarh, Raipur. 2) Director, Veterinary Services, Chhattisgarh, Rafpur(CX3). (Writ Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitutlon of Indial SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satlsh K. Agnlhotrl, J. Preseiirt:Shri AmitVerma, "cwreel for the~pet1%Ter Shri Ajay Baraik, Advocate appeare on behalf ofShri S.K. Beriwat, Standing oounsel for Union of India. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on this 1st day of August, 2008) With consent of tearned counse! appearing for the parties, the inatter is heard finalty. 2) This case pertains to grievance of non-grant of retiral dues. 3) This Court, in the matter of W.P.No.4642^4 (Baijns^h Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & ottiers) and other connected matters, dir»3ted Itie Commlttee to Gonslder the matter of retrial dues as the dispirted qiaestton df fia<^s were involved. The Commrttee was constttuted by the State Govemment, pwsuant to the order dated 19-06-2006 passed in W.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bat Chandrakar Vs. State Govemment of Chhattisgarh and others), and order elated 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattlsgarh and otheps Vs. Baijnath Mandat and another). Thus, this petftton is squarely c<wered fay the judgment and order dated 31st January, 2008 paesed m WP.No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mardal (supra) ) as submttted by learnedcounsel a^^iring for the parties. .-^ 4) This petition is a€XX)rdingtydisposed of in the same terms fce., the office off the Adwcate General is directed to send ttie caseto the Committ^, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy' of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and offlcers conwrn^i within a Turther period of 15 days. The Committeeshall oonsider and pass ©rder, in accordance with law, after affordingproper o|^)ortunity of hearing to tie (^tittoner. The petitioner and the ofRcers concerned may ftle additional docunrents, if necessary. Theentire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, be compieted within a period of foir mortte from the date tf recetpt af a copyofthisorder. 5) The petitioner ^all su^ty one complete sefc of the f^tition to the State counsel as well as counsel for Union of India for transferring ttie same to ttie Committee. . 6} In case of grievance with regard to non-payr^ent of pensionery dt^s, it ta not necessary to ftle a writ petition before thts Court directty. The representation/appUcatfon can be moved before the Penston Cwnmtttee as stated abova The Pension Commtttee shatt not refuse to entertain tie representatton/aj^lication, Sf sofiled directty. Qov« Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge