IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13949 of 2008 Smt.Ranju Kumari, wife of Ravi Shankar @ Mehta, Resident of Village Harsinhapur Lautan, Post Muraul, Via Dholi, P.S. Sakra, District Muzaffarpur…………………………..……Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. 3. The Block Development Officer, Dholi, Muraul, Muzaffarpur. 4. The Child Development Project Officer, Dholi, Muraul, Muzaffarpur. 5. The District Program Officer, Muzaffarpur. 6. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Harsingpur Lautan, District Muzaffarpur. 7. The Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Harsingpur Lautan, District Muzaffarpur. 8. Smt. Ranjana Kumari wife of Rajiv Ranjan, Resident of Village Harsingpur Lautan, Post Muraul, Via Dholi, P.S. Sakra, District Muzaffarpur ……………………………….………………..Respondents ----------- 2 11.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is aggrieved by the entire selection process as well as appointment of respondent no.8 as Anganwari Sevika. From Annexure-8 it appears that the petitioner has already moved the Collector raising her grievance. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that till now the Collector has not decided the same. 2 In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the Collector, Muzaffarpur to decide the grievance raised by the petitioner through her appeal / representation dated 20.05.2008 after hearing the parties in accordance with law by a reasoned order preferably within the time frame fixed under the guidelines for disposal of appeal/representation by the petitioner. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)