^ \-' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. B(LASPUR Criminai Revision No.723/2011 SB: HON'BLE SHRI SUNiL KUMAR SINHA. J. APPUCANT RESPONDENT Puthoot Kanoongo, s/o Ravi Kishore, aged about 26 years, R/o village Saraipali, Police Station, Saraipali, District Mahasamund (CG) Versus •c State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Police Station Saraipali, District Mahasamund (CG) CRIMINAL REVISION UNDER SECTION 397/401 CR.P.C. Appearancer Shri Manoj Paranjape and Shri Vikram Dlxit, Advocates for the applicant. •-' Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer forthe State. •<> ORAL ORDER (14.12.2011) Sunil Kumar S'mha, J. Heard on admission. The applicant is an aceused in ST No.60/2011, pending in the Court of 2" Additional Sessions Judge, Mahasamund (CG). He is aggrieved by the order dated 14.11.2011, whereby, charges have beentframed under Sections 341 and 307 IPC and Sections 25 and 27oftheArmsAct. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that in the faets and circumstances of the case, an offence under Section 307 IPC would "Y .-,/ c.y •-<>. ^^0^^^ fi l^) CRR 723/2011 :v not be made out as the victim received injuries on the left elbow and finger of right hand, therefore, the charges may be suitably altered. On perusal of the FIR lodged by the victim, it would appear that the applicant came on the way of the victim with a knife and attacked over his neck by the knife, on which, the victim received injuries on elbow and finger while resisting the above attempt made by the applicant to cause injury over the neck of the victim by the knife. !t also comes in the FIR that the applicant attempted thelife of the victim by attacking over him by the knife, which was resisted by the victim. In the above facts and circumstances, 1 do not find any infirmity in the order dated 14.11.2011, whereby, along with the other charges, the learned A.S.J. has framed the charge under Section 307 IPC also. The-revision, therefore, fails and Is accordingly djsmjssed. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge m^'