1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1015/2007 (Jugal Kishore Vs. R.P.S.C. Ajmer.) Date of Order : 27/02/2007 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr. J.K.Mishra, for the petitioner. BY THE COURT:- By the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to consider his candidature for appointment in pursuance of advertisement issued in the year 1988-1989. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that one Suresh Chandra Vyas has been given appointment in compliance of the order of this Court dated 7.2.1995 passed in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 3331/89 “Suresh Chandra Vyas Vs. R.P.S.C.”. Earlier, the petitioner, aggrieved by the non- 2 consideration of his case and denial of appointment on the post of Head-master in Secondary School in pursuance of the advertisement No. 1/88-89 issued by the respondent RPSC, preferred a writ petition being S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 1617/96 after a period of about seven years from the date of advertisement. The writ petition came to be dismissed on 18.9.97, against which the petitioner filed a Special Appeal being D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 292/99 which too came to be dismissed by judgment dated 23.5.2001. Thereafter, against the judgment dated 23.5.2001, the petitioner preferred a special leave to appeal being Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 006602/01 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The said special leave to appeal came to be dismissed by Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 28.9.2001. Now the petitioner, by the instant writ petition, seeks to re-agitate the matter which has attained finality on dismissal of the SLP by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. In my view, it is not a fit case warranting interference in the writ jurisdiction. The writ petition has no force and it is therefore dismissed. No order as to costs. (H.R.PANWAR),J. rp