IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15628 of 2009 ANIL PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 22.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under sections 363 and 366/34 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire allegation against the petitioner is absolutely false and frivolous and from the statement of the alleged victim under the provision of section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure it is quite apparent that even according to her claim she went along with the petitioner and after three days she was dropped by him near her house without any objection being raised by her. He also submits that from the said statement, it is quite apparent that the alleged victim had gone with the petitioner as per her own will for being employed somewhere by the petitioner. He also states that there is no allegation of any threat to life or any other offence against the petitioner. He also avers that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, but he is in custody since 23.12.2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. Accordingly, let the sole petitioner, namely, Anil Paswan be enlarged on bail on executing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees 2 ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Samastipur ( Town ) P.S. Case No. 595 of 2008. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )