IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1474 of 2005 MOSSTT. SAHODARI MEHTARANI WIFE OF LATE JAGDISH DOME ALIAS JAGDISH HARI, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA BHIKANPUR POLICE LINE, P.S. KOTWALI (ISHAKCHAK), DISTRICT BHAGALPUR – PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHAGALPUR. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BHAGALPUR. --- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2/ 09-05-2011 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the present writ petition. However, I have heard Mr. Bibhakar Tiwari, learned A.C. to Standing Counsel no. 21, appearing on behalf of the respondents. Learned State counsel by placing reliance on the averments made in the counter affidavit filed separately on behalf of respondent District Magistrate, as also on behalf of respondent Superintendent of Police, submits that apprehension raised in the present proceeding on behalf of the petitioner is completely misconceived. It is also submitted that Harizan Thana has already been constructed over a piece of land, bearing plot no. 247, without demolishing any hut of the petitioner or any other persons, belonging to her community. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances and particularly in view of the averments made in the counter- affidavit, filed on behalf of respondent no. 2 and 3, writ petition has to fail. It is, accordingly, dismissed. However, 2 if the petitioner has any valid grievance with respect to the land in question claimed by her, then she will be at liberty to raise her grievance before respondent District Magistrate within a period of four weeks from today, which may be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. BTiwary/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)