IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4132 OF 2009 Mohan Pandurang Ainkar Laxman Janu Ainkar . ..... ..... ...Applicants V/s The State of Maharashtra ..... ..... ..Respondent. Mr.Ashok Kumar R. Yadav, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, APP for the Respondent. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 11th Sept., 2009. PC: The present applicant is apprehending arrest in CR No.35/09 registered with Nerul police station for the commission of offence under sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 326, 323, 324, 506 read with section 34 of IPC. This application has been moved for anticipatory bail. Prior to the filing of the present application the applicant had moved Sessions Judge with similar application seeking anticipatory bail. The said application came to be rejected vide order dated 27.7.09. The said order is not placed on record. However after lapse of sometime yet another application came to be moved before the Sessions Judge. Perusal of the order dated 26.8.09 reveals that the application moved by the present applicant for grant of anticipatory bail vide Application No.530/09 was also rejected on 27.7.09. The applicant has been absconding is an observation made in the said order. 2. Perusal of FIR reveals that specific overtact is attributed to the present applicant. So far as the present applicant No.1-Mohan Pandurang Ainkar is concerned it is alleged that the applicant No.1 was armed with sword and he has assaulted Rohidas on his face twice resulting in a grievous hurt. In so far as applicant No.2-Laxman Janu Ainkar is concerned it is stated in FIR that he also assaulted one Ramdas with sword on his head and forehead. In that view of the matter in my opinion this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail moreso, when the applicants are stated to be absconding. In the result application stands rejected. 11.9.2009.