1 CRA 363-09 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.363 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.93 OF 2010 Smt. Manibai Hirji Shah & ors ..Applicants V/s. Shahrukh K. Irani & ors ..Respondents Smt.Sushma Singh i/b.M/s.G.H.Shukla & Co., Advocate, for the Applicants Shahrukh K. Irani, Respondent-in-person, present CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 4TH AUGUST, 2010 P.C. . After hearing the learned Counsel for the Applicants and Respondent-in-person for some time, the learned Counsel for the Applicants on instructions from her client states that she seeks to withdraw the Revision and requests that Applicants be given two years time to vacate the premises, since the shop in the premises is the only source of income to her and her family consists of 24 members. The Respondent-landlord, who is present in person and argued the matter states 2 CRA 363-09 that he may maximum concede three months period. Considering the difficulties the Applicants may be given sufficient time for execution of the decree. The decree may not be put to execution for a period of one year i. e. 1st August, 2011 with an understanding that no extension of time would be sought or granted, on the Applicants' furnishing usual undertaking within a period of three weeks and continuing to pay compensation which has been ordered on the Civil Application. If there is any default, the landlord would be at liberty to put the decree to execution. On 31st July, 2011, the Applicants shall hand over possession to the landlord. 2. Civil Revision Application is allowed to be withdrawn. Civil Revision Application is disposed as withdrawn. 3. In view of disposal of the Civil Revision Application, Civil Application No.93 3 CRA 363-09 of 2010 does not survive and the same is disposed of. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)