IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 340 OF 2010(O&M) in CWP No. 715 of 1986. DATE OF DECISION: November 25, 2010. Parties Name Shanti Devi and others ...PETITIONERS. VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih PRESENT: H.K.Aurora, Advocate, for the petitioners-applicants. JASBIR SINGH, J. (oral) Order. CM No. 16637 of 2010. This application has been filed under Order 22 Rule 4 read with Section 151 CPC for bringing on record legal representatives of Smt. Shanti Devi, petitioner No. 1. Application is supported by an affidavit. In view of reasoning given in the application, it is allowed and the persons, mentioned in para No. 4 of the application, are allowed to be brought on record as legal representatives of deceased Smt. Shanti Devi, petitioner No. 1 for the purpose of this case and subject to all just exceptions. RA No. 340 of 2010: This application has been filed with a prayer to review order dated September 7, 2010, through an Advocate, who was not the counsel at the time of passing the impugned order. On this score alone, this application can be dismissed. Be that as it may, it is grievance of the counsel for the applicants that in the affidavit, filed by the Deputy Commissioner, it was wrongly stated that the beneficiaries have constructed houses over the land, which was subject matter of acquisition. In the order passed, it is specifically stated that the Gram Panchayat land is not suitable to use it for the residential purpose. If that is so, the petitioners' claim that their land be released and the Gram Panchayat land be acquired cannot be accepted. No case is made out for interference. Dismissed. ( JASBIR SINGH ) JUDGE (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) JUDGE November 25, 2010. DKC