1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 3482/2007 (Sheikh Razique Sheikh Hatam & ors. Vs. Zilla Parishad, Akola & anr.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM :D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 20, 2008. Heard Mr. Palshikar for the petitioners, and Ms. Gaiki for respondents. The counsel for the petitioners states that the cause of action involved in the present writ petition is identical to one involved in Writ Petition No. 5172/2006 which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 21/11/2006 on the basis of the statement made by Zilla Parishad particularly in para 2 of the affidavit dated 16/11/2006 filed in the said writ petition and, therefore, the present writ petition may be disposed of accordingly. Counsel for the respondents does not dispute the factual aspect of the matter. Considered the contentions 2 canvassed by the respective counsel. This Court, vide order dated 21/11/2006, disposed of Writ Petition No. 5172/2006 by observing thus- “Heard Shri Palshikar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Gaikee, learned counsel for the respondents. In view of statement made by respondent nos.1 and 2 in para (2) of the affidavit dated 16/11/2006, grievance of the petitioners does not survive. The petition is disposed of accordingly. However, we expect the respondents to take a decision at the earliest.” Since it is not in dispute that the cause of action involved in the present writ petition is similar to one involved in Writ Petition No. 5172/2006, we dispose of the present writ petition in view of the above referred order and expect the respondents to take a decision at the earliest. JUDGE JUDGE RMP