WPCRL No. 399 of 2011 with CLMA No. 5123 of 2011 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Shri Chetan Joshi, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Shri G.S. Sandhu, G.A., present for the respondent no. 1 and 2. Heard. By means of this petition moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought quashing of the First Information Report dated 18.05.2011, registered as FIR No. 80 of 2011, relating to offences punishable under section 498A, 323 IPC, and one punishable under section ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, P.S. Ramnagar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it is abuse of process of law on the part of the respondent no. 3 to implicate the petitioner in the case. It is pointed out that the petitioner is brother-in-law (NANDOI) of the complainant who lives separately from Satish Garwal (husband of the respondent no. 3.). It is further submitted that no specific role has been assigned to the petitioner. Admit the petition. Learned counsel for the State prays for, and is allowed six weeks' time to file the counter affidavit. Issue notice to respondent no. 3 Bhawana Garwal who may also file her counter affidavit within a period of six weeks. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties, as an interim measure, it is directed that petitioner Bhuwan Chandra Sati shall not be arrested in connection with aforesaid crime, during investigation provided that he co-operates with the investigating agency. List after six weeks. (Interim relief application no. 5123 of 2011, stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Parul 25.05.2011