s ?@1 'B^^co III i-a®S@; (S BKffi ISIi € .u;;m»II ^a- li^i: ';i€i ws' jj — ^tf^^ Sisssea K^%^st^l m :'\^^ ^j 3) No application for condonation of the delay in fiting the petition under Section378 (3)0f Cr.P.C. was filed alongwith the petition. : • ; ) ,, ' :' ;" •, ;- • l'~ :: •• : .•; 4) In fact, no such application has been filed till date though a period of more than 5 years lias elapsed Sijnce filing of the petition under Section 378(3)0f C ^.C. on 28-02-2005. 5)lnthisviewcrfthematter,wedonotfindanyjustificationin the prayer of learned Addjtional Advocate Generat for grant of more time in that behalf. 6) The above prayer of learned Additional Advocate General, therefore, fe rejected. 7) As the petitioner/ State has failed in showing any cause, much less sufficient causefbr the delay in filing the petition under Sectron 378 (3) of Cr.P.C., we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the petition as barred by time. 8) The petition filed by the petitiOner/Stale under Sectjon ^78(3)ofCr.P.C.,therefore,isdismissedas't)me-barred'. Sd/- ChiefJustice subbu Sd/- R.N.Chandrakar Judge i /•