q ‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Coram: Hon’ ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra, & i Hon’ ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar, JJ Writ Petition (S) No. 114 of 2011 Petitioners ‘1. Purnoram, son of Govardhan Ram, aged about 50 years, residence of Judawain, Post Behrakhar, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Devnish Xalxo, son of Samuel Xalxo, aged about 47 years residence of vHlage Kurumdodha Post Ranpur, Tahsil Baglcha District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh fog; 3. Radhelal Shah ‘son of Beneshwar t aged about 45 years, residence of <L, 'Pandripani, Tahsil Bagicha, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Tankeshwar Ram Yadav, son of Sudro Ram, aged about 47 years, residence of Ranikombo, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur, Chhatisgarh. 5. Pitambar Yadav, son of Shkru Yadav, aged about 47 years, residence of Jumikela,‘ Tahsil Kansabei, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. Vs. e y p 1) State of Chhattisgarh through th Secretar, Deartment of Panchayat Respondents ad Soii Wl B, n ca efare, D.K.S, hawan anraa, aip (CG). Mtlay Rur Se f Ma radesh, through th S, eartment of Schoo Eduti, alla Bhawan, Bhopal MP t f hsgarh through th Sr eartment of Schoo u a lyan Smgh Bhawan u ar ni o di ough the Secretary tmt uman Resource eoet, stri Bhawan, New elh. Dcto, Dpartm d irer eent of Panchayat an oa ear, tate of Chhattisgarh Scil Wlfe S , Raipu, tisgrh r Chhata tat o dhya P e ecretary Dp l , caon Vbh (). Sate o Chatti e ecretay, Dp l Edcation Du Ka Ralpr Chhattisgh Uon f ina thr , Deparen of H s Devlpmn Sha Di (Writ eition uner cl 6 f the onstituion of ndia) Pt d Adie 22 o Ct I Present: Shri C.J.K. Rao, counsei for the petitioners. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Govt. Advocate for the State. Shri Raghavendra Pradhan, counsel for respondent No.4. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 12—1 -201 1) Per Dhirendra Mi’shra, J. 1. By this writ petition, the petitioners have impugned the constitutionai vaiidity of the provisions of Chhattisgarh Panchayat Samvida Shala - Shikshak (Empioyment and Condition of Contract) Ruies, 2005 on the :5“ \ ' ground that they are violative of the petitioners fundamental rights. ' K 2s Learned co‘unsei appearing for the petitioners submits that the constitutionai validity of the aforesaid provisions came for consideration before this Court in Writ Petition No. 1893 of 2005 and other connected writ petitions and the same. have been disposed of by this court vide order dated 11—8-2010. Thus, the instant petition may also be disposed of in similar terms. > . 3. I. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the State submits that he has no objectiOn if the instant petition is disposed of in t. ' terms of the order dated 11-8-2010 passed by this court in Writ Petition No. 1893 of 2005 (Shaskiya Aupcharikettar Shikshak Sangh Chhattisgarh and others vs. State of CG and others). l... , 3:1 4. in view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of in the terms of the decfsion in the matter of Shaskiya Aupcharikettar Shikshak Sangh, Chhattisgarh and others vs. State of CG and others. We further direct the State Government to take a decision in the matter as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of copy of this. WA L _ I order before the respondent No.1. t wwww ...'.'........... fl . l V i Sd/_ - ’l r Sd/. Dhirendra Mlshl‘a l Rangnath Chandrakar Judge i Judge Raju ,