IN THE HIGH CQURT ’F JUDICATURE AT MLASPUR WRIT E’ETITION NG. "£\l@ OF 2005 PETITIONER: // Vishnu Prasad, aged about 55 ycar$, son of Lats Jhalosai, resident of Catsgory-III, Kumda Mines. SECL. Vishrampur Region, District Koriya (Chhattisgarh). VS . South Eastern Coalfields Ltd” through the Chairman cum Managing Director Seepat Road, Bila‘spur (Chhattisgarh). z 2. Th6 ChiEf GcnEral Managcr, Scuth Eastarn Coalfields Ltd . , Vishrampur Region, D istric t Koriya (Chhattisgarh). , ’3. Thé Personnel Manager, South Eastern Coalfields RESPONDENTS wnm pE'nTmN UNDER ARTIcLE 22’? as gage}; THE 0 _ * ONSTITIITION oF mom FoR xsgmaJwE OF AN PPROPRIATE VVRIT IE THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS { CERTIORARI ETCOR DIRECTIOINHS! l ORDERISI IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. Ltd., Vishrampur Region, District‘ Koriva (Chhattisgarh). x wArg‘w/mg W§wiai mzoo maw m R) , 1mm $11175 ’u 3'? ‘a-néerawm" ' amm$ramias H " .‘mmwma 2 V»mmm#f3‘ém $W 311%21 ‘K but the result of the said comhiittee’ has not been communicated to him so far. , in tile‘facts and circnm stances of the case, in the opinion of this Court, the ends ofjustica would be sawed if a direction wculd be issued to the respondents to communicate the decision of the age deteimination committee 10 the petitioner. V‘I‘t is directed that if the case of the petitioner has been examined by the age determin ation committee, as per the direction of this Court, the concerned authority [shall communicate the decision of the committee to the petitioner within a peliod of 15 clays from the date of tiling of a certified copy of this order before the said authority. ’It is also directed that if the earlierorder passed by this Court has not been complied with so far, then the committee shall comply with the aforesaid order and then only the decision shall be communicattd to the petitioner but in that case, the said communication will he sent to him within a pen'od of 1 month from the date of tiling ofcertified copy of this order. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands finally disposed of. Neédles to say that the \ \ 5v“ C SP/FS/2005.2o,ooo // 1 .m'.1>.«.No§I20 .ws mm I maimRmi . decision of the age determination committee shall follow‘its own course for deciding the case of the petitioner regardingihis seivice benefits. i Sunil Kumar Sinh“ " Sdl— Judge g