IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.328 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7973 OF 2009 M/s. Milaaya Embroidery Pvt.Ltd. ... Appellant Versus State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents Mr. Sushil Mahadeshwar i/by Ms. Ranjana Todankar for the appellant. Mr. VP. Malwankar, `A' Panel Counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Naresh Ashok Daraj, Asstt. Director, Industrial Safety & Health present. CORAM : ANIL R. DAVE, C. J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 5TH MARCH, 2010 P.C. The grievance made in this appeal is with regard to the order passed by the learned Single Judge by virtue of which the learned Single Judge has confirmed an order of refusal to grant exemption to the appellant under the provisions of Rule 70(9)(o) of the Maharashtra Factories Rules, 1963. 2. Upon hearing the learned Advocates, the learned Single Judge came to the conclusion that there was no justification for granting any exemption to the appellant-petitioner under the afore-stated provision. 3. We have heard the learned advocates and have also called for the record. Upon perusal of the record, we have found that at the time of inspection of the premises in question, 71 persons were found working in a small area of about 2400 square feet and there was only one exit to the factory premises. In these circumstances, respondent No.2 had rejected the application made by the appellant praying for the exemption. 4. We do not see any reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge because we are satisfied that the premises in question had been inspected and no case was made out for grant of exemption as prayed for and, therefore, the application was rejected. 5. There is no substance in the appeal and the same is dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.