THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1507 of 2011 ORDER: 1 This Contempt Case is filed alleging that the respondents have violated the directions issued by this Court in W.P.No.9993 of 2010 dated 28.04.2010. 2 Petitioner was a driver in the respondent Corporation on contract basis. When an order of termination was passed vide office order No.T1/1(13)/2008-MTPL, dated 01.04.2008 he approached this Court and filed W.P.No.9993 of 2010. This court, while disposing of the said Writ Petition on 28.04.2010, set aside the order of termination with a direction to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service as a Driver on contract basis and with a further direction to extend all the benefits which are extended to the contract drivers, to the petitioner. 3 When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents has produced a copy of the order, dated 01.12.2011. Under the aforesaid order, the petitioner was reinstated into service as Driver Grade-II with probationary rights. 4 Though there was some delay on the part of the respondents, in view of the issuing of order dated 01.12.2011 in Proceedings No.E2/255 (6)/11-KR.I, reinstating the petitioner as Driver Grade II with probationary rights, I do not find any reason to proceed against the respondents under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. It is needless to observe that consequent upon the reinstatement of the petitioner into service, I am sure that the respondents will determine and pay the other benefits to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. 5 Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. No costs. -------------------------- R.Subhash Reddy, J. 19.12.2011 Kvsn