1 CA4312/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4312 OF 2011 Anil @ Dhondu s/o Babulal Bawiskar & two Ors. Applicants V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra Respondent Shri S.S. Kulkarni, Advocate for the applicants Shri B.V. Wagh, APP for the respondent / State CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 16th November, 2011 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Advocates for both sides. 2. The three applicants apprehend their arrest in connection with Crime No. 117 of 2011, registered with Bhadgaon Police Station, District Jalgaon. 3. The incident is of 23rd August, 2011. A perusal of the record goes to show that the present applicants alongwith Raviraj, Manoj and Vilas entered the field of the complainant duly armed with wooden rod and sticks and inflicted the same upon persons who were present there and in all three persons are reported to have been suffered injuries, viz; Vasant, Rekha and Ramesh. 4. The prosecution has recorded statements of as many as 3 to 4 persons, who have narrated the incident in the context of F.I.R. According to 2 CA4312/2011 the present applicants, the victims were prohibited from entering in the field by an order passed by the Civil Court and they violated the said order. According to the applicants, they have been falsely implicated in the present case. As on today, I am required to give weightage to the statements which are recorded and those statements clearly attribute the specific role to the three applicants, from which it is clear that these three applicants during the course of alleged incident used wooden rod, sticks which were carried by them and inflicted the same and caused injuries to the complainant and others. In my view, this is not a case where the applicants can be granted anticipatory bail. Their custodial interrogation of the applicants is necessary. In view of above, the application stands rejected. ( R.Y. GANOO, J. ) SRM/ca/4312/11/16/11/11