IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL SECOND APPEAL No. 27 of 2004 KARANMAL V/S KUNWAR LAL Mr. MANISH SHISODIA, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. CS KOTWANI, for the respondent Date of Order : 3.10.2006 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the impugned judgment. The finding recorded by the learned courts below about the defendant having failed to establish himself to be sole owner of the chowk and to be entitled to place his belongings in the chowk; rather on special occasion he was permitted to use the chowk, are all pure finding of fact, and are not satisfactorily shown to have been vitiated on any of the grounds available under Section 100 C.P.C. The appeal thus does not involve any substantial question of law. The same is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /rm/