IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2010 / 20TH JYAISTHA 1932 FAO.No. 185 of 2009() --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 02/03/2009 IN IA 153/09 IN OS.6/2009 of SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR .................... APPELLANT/IST RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF ------------------------------------------------------ TONY, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.POULOSE, PEREPPADAN HOUSE, PULLAZHI DESOM, PULLAZHI VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.N.K.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONER/2ND RESPONDENT/DEFENDANTS --------------------------------------------------- 1. U AND M INVESTMENT, ERUMATHALA KARA, ALUVA EAST VILLAGE, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, BOBAN JOSEPH, S/O.JOSEPH, MALIYEKKAL HOUSE, ERUMATHALA KARA. 2. RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O.NARAYANA PILLAI, KAVISSERY HOUSE, AIMURI KARA, KOOVAPPADY VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. ADV. SRI.C.HARIKUMAR FOR R1 THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- F.A.O.No.185 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. The plaintiff in a suit for money appeals against an order passed on a claim petition filed by a third party before the court below. The appealing plaintiff had not filed any objections to the claim petition. We are also shown the copy of judgment dated 27.3.2010 whereby the plaint itself stands rejected for non-payment of balance court fee. In this view of the matter, we do not find any merit to entertain this FAO. The same is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, Judge. kkb.11/06.