HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 2976 OF 2010 Saturday, the Twenty Seventh day of August, Two Thousand and Eleven Between Kanneganti Jhansi Petitioners AND Shakeela Begum Respondent ORDER: Heard. The Petitioner suffered a decree of eviction in O.S.514/2005 dated 01.12.2008 on the file of the 1st Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Tenali. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed A.S.83/2008 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tenali. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent/landlord is intended to run a beauty clinic in the suit schedule property which is not suitable, and therefore, whether the said premises is suitable for beauty clinic or not, an Advocate-Commissioner is required to be appointed for receiving the additional evidence, and for noting down the physical features of the shop. I am of the opinion that the said I.A filed by the petitioner is beyond the scope, and she cannot dictate terms to the landlord, as the landlord is at liberty to utilize the schedule premises for any purpose as per her wish and desire. The suit was filed for eviction of the petitioner herein and the same was decreed. It is for the lower appellate Court to decide as to whether the judgment and decree of the trial Court is legal or not. The application filed by the petitioner herein is nothing to do with the issue for resolving the controversy. The lower Appellate Court rightly dismissed the said application. I do not see any infirmity, legal or otherwise, to interfere with the impugned order. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ Justice V.Eswaraiah August 27, 2011 MAS