IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13969 of 2010 PRASAD RAI S/O LATE NIRSU RAI R/O VILL & P.O.TURKI, P.S.KURHANI, DISTT-MUZAFFARPUR …PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COLLECTOR MUZAFFARPUR 2. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION MUZAFFARPUR 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION MUZAFFARPUR 4. THE CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, KURHANI, DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR 5. THE ANCHAL ADHKARI KURHANI, DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR 6. PRMOD PD. YADAV, EX MUKHIYA S/O LATE PURAN MAHTO R/O VILL & P.O.TURKI, P.S.KURHANI,DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR 7. RAJ NANDAN RAI S/O LATE BHUJANGA RAI R/O VILL & P.O.TURKI, P.S.KURHANI,DISTT-MUZAFFARPUR …RESPONDENTS For the petitioner :Mr. Bhubneshar Prasad For respondents 6 & 7 :Mr. Shyasm Sunder Pandey ----------- 05. 18.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the private respondents and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 07.02.2008, passed by the respondent-Joint Director of Consolidation, Muzaffarpur in Rev. Case No. 189/1995, whereby the order passed by respondent no.4 in Case No. 77/87 was interfered with and set aside. The dispute pertains to 04 decimals of lands appertaining to old khata no.656, old khesra no.983 corresponding to new khata no.1207, new khesra no.1515, thana no.163, situated in village Turki in the district of Muzaffarpur. Admittedly, it appears from the impugned order 2 that there is a suit being Title Suit No. 44/96 passed between the petitioner and the private respondents. Learned counsel for the private respondents informs the Court that civil revision application preferred earlier by the respondents has been disposed of and said suit has now been taken up for disposal. Considering that aspect of the matter, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. Needless to observe that right title and interest in respect of the land(s) in question between the parties shall abide by the final adjudication to be made in the pending suit. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )