1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.271 OF 2006 IN CRI.APPEAL NO.187 OF 2006 Raju Nandalal Gupta, .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr S.D.suryawanshi, for the applicant. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 13th JUNE, 2006 DATED : 13th JUNE, 2006 DATED : 13th JUNE, 2006 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr Suryawanshi, learned counsel for the applicant, states that he is not getting any instructions from his client and the instructing advocate and that they are not responding his letter and, therefore he could not prepare a compilation of the notes of evidence. He is also not in a position to state whether the applicant, after his conviction vide order dated 30.1.2006, has surrendered or not. 3. By way of last chance to the applicant to file a compilation of the notes of evidence, stand over for two weeks. In the meantime, the applicant shall surrender, if not surrendered already, and file proof of his surrender before the adjourned date of hearing. 2 2 2 If the applicant fails to comply with this order before the adjourned date of hearing, his application and the appeal shall stand dismissed for nonprosecution without further reference to the Court. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)