1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7765 OF 2006 Suhas Chimaji Vite ..Petitioner Vs. Chief Executive Officer Pune Zilla Parishad, Pune & Ors. ..Respondents Mr.Mahindra Patil for the petitioner CORAM : A.P.DESHPANDE, J CORAM : A.P.DESHPANDE, J CORAM : A.P.DESHPANDE, J DATED : 29TH NOVEMBER, 2006 DATED : 29TH NOVEMBER, 2006 DATED : 29TH NOVEMBER, 2006 P.C.: 1. The petitioner who is a primary school teacher in Zilla Parishad came to be suspended on 27.3.06 in contemplation of departmental enquiry on the charges of mis conduct. As the enquiry was not completed in a short period of time, the order of suspension was revoked and the petitioner was reinstated in service on 16.6.06. However, instead of retaining the petitioner at the earlier place, he came to be transferred to Velha Taluka by an order dt.23.6.06. The petitioner challenged this order of transfer by filing a dispute in the court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune so also moved 2 an application for temporary injunction. The trial court dismissed the application for temporary injunction on he ground that the enquiry was pending against the petitioner and the appellate court dismissed the Misc.Civil Appeal filed by the petitioner. 2. Perused the orders. I do not find anything wrong in effecting transfer of the petitioner to a nearby place as the departmental enquiry is pending at the place where the petitioner was working earlier. The order of the first appellate court reveal that the departmental enquiry is at concluding stage. 3. In this view of the matter, no interference is called for. However, it is made clear that after the departmental enquiry is over, it shall be open for he petitioner to move the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad by representation, to post the petitioner and his wife at one place. Writ Petition is summarily dismissed. 3 ( SHRI A.P.DESHPANDE, J ) ( SHRI A.P.DESHPANDE, J ) ( SHRI A.P.DESHPANDE, J )