1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.1981 of NO.1981 of NO.1981 of 1985 Universal Cables Ltd .. Plaintiff versus Reliable Roadways .. Defendant Mr.D.B.Parab i/b Gor.Foz.for Plaintiff None for Defendant CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED DATED DATED : 12th August, 2005. : 12th August, 2005. : 12th August, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff. None present for the defendants. The defendants has not filed the written statement for nearly 20 years. Hence, the averments made in the plaint are deemed to be admitted. 2. The suit is for recovery of money. The suit of the plaintiff is decreed under Order 8 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure in terms of the prayer clause. 2 D.G.KARNIK, J