IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION Nos. 5296 of 1984 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 2938 of 1985 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 2926 of 1985 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI Sd/- and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- GUJARAT STATE TEXTILE CORPN. Versus UNION OF INDIA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: NANAVATI ASSOCIATES for Petitioner. MR JT TRIVEDI for Official Liquidator. MR DARSHAN M PARIKH. : MR AC GANDHI. : Advocates MR HJ JANI., AGP.for State. : for respective MR ASIM PANDYA. : Respondents. MR SHALIN MEHTA : MR KM PARIKH : NANAVATI & NANAVATI. : -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI and MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 07/02/2002 COMMON JUDGEMENT (Per : CHIEF JUSTICE MR DM DHARMADHIKARI) Learned Counsel appearing for Official Liquidator representing Gujarat State Textile Corporation states that in the present circumstances, he would not press these petitions if the Corporation is allowed to canvass their rights and contentions in pending First Appeals i.e. First Appeal No.1912 of 1983 and First Appeal No. 197 of 1984 and/or Execution Applications. On request, all these petitions are accordingly disposed of as not pressed, with a liberty to the parties to canvass their arguments and without prejudice to their rights and contentions in pending First Appeals and/or Execution Applications. So far as the request regarding quantification of the fees of the lawyer representing the Official Liquidator is concerned, we leave it to the Official Liquidator to decide. Rule is discharged. There shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- (D.M.Dharmadhikar, C.J.) Sd/- (D.A.Mehta, J) m.m.bhatt