1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.08.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.P.S.JANARTHANA RAJA and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN Habeas Corpus Petition(MD)No.634 of 2011 G.Chandramohan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.State represented by The Sub Inpector of Police, Vilakuthun Police Station, Madurai, Madurai District. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District. 3.Prabaharan .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents herein to produce the body and person of the petitioner's daughter C.Vijayalakshmi, aged 22, before this Court and set her at liberty. For petitioner : Mr.S.Subaharan For respondents : Mr.C.Ramesh, Addl.Public Prosecutor for R1 & R2 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by ARUNA JAGADEESAN, J.) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondents 1 and 2 herein to produce his daughter by name Vijayalakshmi, aged 22 years, before this Court and set her at liberty. 2.The petitioner is the father of the detenue-Vijayalakshmi, aged about 22 years. According to the petitioner, the detenue was working in Tamil Nadu Food Corporation Private Limited, Keelamasi Vethi, Madurai; on 25.07.2011, as usual, his daughter went to her office at 9.00 a.m.; normally she will be returning at 6.00 p.m., but on that day, she did not return. Therefore, the petitioner made enquiries and came to know that that his daughter-Vijayalakshmi was forcibly abducted by the third respondent. Hence, the petitioner gave a complaint to the first and second respondent-Police to trace out his daughter. Since no sincere efforts were taken by the police, he has approached this Court by way of filing the present Habeas Corpus Petition with the prayer as already stated supra. 3.Today, the detenue-Vijayalakshmi appeared before us. When we enquired, she stated that she is not under the illegal confinement of any one, much less the third respondent. Further, she stated that she had friendship with the third respondent and went to his house and that now https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 she has returned to her parents' place. She also categorically stated that she has no connection whatsoever with the third respondent and that she is now willing to go along with the petitioner/her father. 4.The detenue-Vijayalakshmi is a major. Further, she is not under the illegal confinement of any one much less the third respondent. She has also expressed her willingness to go along with the petitioner/her father. Therefore, recording the statement made by the detenue, the Habeas Corpus Petition is closed, as nothing further remains to be considered. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (crl.side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Sub Inpector of Police, Vilakuthun Police Station, Madurai, Madurai District. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KM PJ : 25/08/2011 : 2P/4C HCP(MD)No.634 of 2011 12.08.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/