IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2011 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32004 of 2011(A) ---------------------------------------- CRIME NO.719/2011 OF KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION. .................. PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- PREMA JOHNSON, AGED 48 YEARS, W/O.JOHNSON, THANIKKAL HOUSE, PATHANGADI, MANGAD, THALAPPILLY THALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THRISSUR- 680 001. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR COLLECTORATE, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR- 680 001. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT- 680 503. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.JASMINE. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/12/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 32004 of 2011(A) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE JFCM COURT, KUNNAMKULAM. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CRIME NO. 701/2011 OF KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE BAIL APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 02/09/2011 IN BA NO.6677/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.32004 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2011 Order Heard both sides. The third respondent is present in court. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that now the third respondent has understood as to the necessity of the entries in the registers/account books and the receipts which were stated to have been seized, getting examined by an expert to find out whether the allegation of forgery is true. The learned Public Prosecutor further submits that it will be done properly and investigation will be conducted properly. If the investigation is not conducted properly and not completed within six months from today, the petitioner can approach this court again. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. srd 2 3