IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14136 of 2007 MD. NAUSHAD NADAF & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR AND ANOTHER ----------- 3. 11.9.2008. Heard the leaned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned counsel for O.P. No.2 and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners have prayed for the quashing of the entire criminal proceeding arising out of Complaint Case No.861 of 2006. The sole ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioners in support of his submission is that they have been falsely implicated in this case inasmuch the petitioner no.1, Md. Naushad Nadaf was never married to O.P. No.2, Azima Khatoon. The submission advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners happens to be dealing with a purely disputed question of fact which cannot be looked into by this Court in exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as the powers thereunder are strictly limited. There is another aspect of the matter. During the pendency of this application cognizance has already been taken under Sections 498-A and 379 I.P.C. against the petitioners. Once cognizance has been taken after holding an inquiry under Section 202 Cr.P.C., it is too late in the day to pray for the quashing of the complaint petition. The present application being misconceived is hereby dismissed. P.S. (Abhijit Sinha,J)