1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO:1/2008 (Ashok s/o Punjabrao Dahikar and Others v. State of Maharashtra and others ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders. .................................................................................................................................................................. CORAM: D.D.SINH A & SMT. V.A .NAIK , JJ. DATED: 22nd February, 2008. *** Heard Mr. A.S.Chandurkar, learned counsel for petitioners; Mr. N.S.Khubalkar, learned AGP for Respondents 1,3,4 and 5 and Shri Anjan De, for Respondent no.2. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in the instant petition, petitioners are seeking mainly two directions, firstly, the respondent No. 2- Market Committee be directed not to take a major policy and financial decision till the elections of the Board of Directors of the APMC are held and, secondly, against the Respondent No. 2 APMC not to open the tender for pre-qualification bid for construction work to be undertaken for APMC. 2 3. Mr. De, learned counsel for APMC has made a statement that till the elections of the Board of Directors of the APMC are held, the APMC will not take any major policy and financial decision. Mr. De, further, contended that tenders which were received along with other offers received for construction work, are forwarded to the Director of Marketing - Respondent No. 3, who is the Competent Authority to take decision about allotment of work according to the procedure applicable in this regard. 4. Learned AGP states that if the Respondent No. 3 has received the above referred documents i.e. Tender and others offers and if respondent no.3 has not taken any decision till this date, appropriate decision according to law and procedure including the guidelines applicable in this regard, shall be taken at the earliest. 5. In the backdrop of above-referred facts, no specific orders at this stage are necessary and the cause of action also comes to an end. Consequently the Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE sahare