WP(C) 199/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Ms.K.D.Sarma learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner. Al so heard Mr.B.Pathak learned counsel appears for respondent. The petitioner was inducted as a Constable in the CRPF organisation and was terminated from service at the stage of training. According to Mr.Pathak, th e petitioner was suffering from Tuberculosis and was unable to continue with the rigours of the training. Consequently the termination order was issued on 11.12 .09(Annexure-5) under Rule 5 (1) of the Central Civil Services(Temporary Servi ce) Rules,1965, by giving one month notice to the trainee. Mr.Sarma learned counsel submits that the petitioner has since attained fitness and therefore he should be subjected to a fresh medical test, to deter mine his current fitness standard. Mr Pathak does not oppose the prayer for a fresh medical examination si nce the petitioner is continuing in the organisation, on the strength of the Co urt’s interim order passed on 11.1.01. Considering the nature of the case, I am of the view that the respond ents should be directed to conduct a fresh medical examination of the petitione r, to determine his fitness. Depending upon the outcome of the medical test, c onsequential decision may then be taken by the CRPF authorities. With the above direction, this case is disposed of. The interim order will operate until the fresh decision is taken by the C.R.P.F. authorities.