1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 1956/2010 (State of Maharashtra through PSO PS City Kotwali, Amravati, .vs. Sheikh Salim Sheikh Farid ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. S.S. Doifode, APP for Applicant. Mr. P.Z. Mirza, Advocate for Respondent. .......... CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATED : APRIL 08, 2011 Heard. The prosecution has sought cancellation of the bail granted upon an application preferred by the respondent by an order dated 12.11.2010 in connection with Crime No.325/2010 registered with Police Station City Kotwali, Amravati for offences under Sections 395, 397, 412, 414, 120-B and 342 of IPC, sections 3/25 and 4/25 of the Arms Act and sections 3(1)(ii) , (2) (4) (5) of MCOC Act. The cancellation of the bail is sought primarily on the ground that the material available against the respondent being not taken into consideration while acceding with the prayer for bail made. The careful perusal of the reasoning given in paragraph no.8 reveals that the learned Sessions Judge has taken into consideration the material then available 2 against the respondent. The learned APP was not able to pin-point any other material other than the material referred in the said paragraph. Having regard to the same and having regard to the reasons given for granting of bail, it is difficult to accept that view taken by the learned Sessions is not a probable view considering the case of the prosecution against the applicant on the basis of the ratio given in the decision in the case of Ranjitsingh Brahmajeetsingh Sharma .vs. State of Maharashtra and another reported in 2005 ALL MR (Cri) 1538 (SC). In view of the same, no case is made out for cancellation of the bail. The application stands rejected. JUDGE halwai