IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-9687 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 5,2011 Sudesh Kumari ....................................................... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ........................................ Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. K.D.S.Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner contends that a complaint had been made by her to the Deputy Commissioner, Jalandhar, regarding misbehaviour of Shital Singh, Vocational Teacher. It is also stated in the complaint that due to fear and terror, she is not going to the school because of which her family is suffering financial loss. A representation (Annexure P-2) in this regard has also been made to the D.P.I. (Sr. Sec.) (Pb.), Chandigarh. This criminal miscellaneous is disposed of by giving a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Jalandhar, (respondent No.2) to look into the complaint and pass appropriate orders expeditiously. 5.4.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE