IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.524 of 2009 1. JAYADA KHATOON WIFE OF ANSARUL HAQUE, D/O- LATE MOZIM RAHMAN, R/O- VILLAGE- CHANDSI PATTI, P.S.- SUPAUL, DISTRICT- SUPAUL. 2. JAHANGIR ALAM MINOR SON OF ANSARUL HAQUE. 3. SAMAR JAHAN MINOR DAUGHTER OF ANSARUL HAQUE 4. JAVED HUSSAIN MINOR SON OF ANSARUL HAQUE 5. ROSHAN JAHAN MINOR DAUGHTER OF ANSARUL HAQUE SL NOS. 2 TO 5 ARE UNDER THE NATURAL GUARDIANSHIP OF THEIR MOTHER ZAYIDA KHATOON (PETITIONER NO. 1) ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE- CHANDSI PATTI, P.S.- SUPAUL, DISTRICT- SUPAUL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ANSARUL HAQUE S/O- LATE MD. KHALIL HAQUE, R/O- CHANDSI PATTI, P.S.- SUPAUL, DISTRICT- SUPAUL For the petitioners : Mr. Bidhanesh Misra, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ----------- 2 09.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Applicant-wife is aggrieved by the quantum of maintenance granted under the impugned order passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Saharsa in Misc. Case no.6 of 1999. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the salary of the husband has been revised in view of the acceptance of the report of the Pay Revision Committee. This Court finds from paragraph 8 that the following observations have been made by learned Principal Judge in paragraph no. 8 of the order impugned: “….. The quantum of maintenance would be revisable on increment in pay after each pay commission………” If that is the position, the petitioner has already been 2 granted adequate relief in the impugned order. The application is accordingly disposed of. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )