CRP 221/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Md. Aslam, learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel submits on instructions that inspite of best efforts, the pr esent whereabouts of the opposite party is not known. On an earlier occasion, no tice of the instant petition having been sent to the opposite party by registere d post with A/D had returned unserved with the remark addressee left the statio n . The present challenge is against the order dated 28.5.2007 whereby the learned c ourt below had accepted the written statement filed on behalf of the opposite pa rty in Title Suit(D) 10/2004 instituted by the petitioner for dissolution of mar riage between the parties. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and on a consideration of t he pleaded facts as well as the reasons recorded in the impugned order, this Cou rt finds no ground in exercise of its power under Article 227 of the Constitutio n of India to interfere therewith. The petition is rejected. The petitioner would appear before the learned trial c ourt on 12.9.11 whereafter it would proceed with the suit in accordance with law after due notice to the opposite party. The petition is closed. No costs.