1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 4500/2006 (Mota Ram & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 10/10/2006 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. D.L.Mothsra for the petitioners. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the bail application filed on behalf of petitioner No.1 Mota Ram who alleged to have inflicted injury by sharp edged weapon on the skull. The bail application filed on behalf of petitioner No.1 Mota Ram is therefore, dismissed as not pressed. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties and the fact that no injury has been caused by the present petitioners No. 2 to 5 on any vital part of the injured, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Chhotu Ram S/o Sultan, Hanuman S/o Jeeta Ram, Jagdish S/o Jeeta Ram and Lal Chand S/o Jeeta Ram be released on bail in FIR No.444/06 P.S. Nohar, district Hanumangarh, provided each of them executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their 2 appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP