I:r- ^•G^/ !'r ' ..-— % >•" EN THEJUGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRETPETmON^S)NO. i/K^l.i /2009 Slns Dev Kmnar Yadav, S/o- Shri Fagu Ram Yadav, Aged about 54 years, Presently working as Upper Division Teacher, ...-• In Govt. Middle School-Laxmangarh, ,,^J ..-•'Block-Udaipur, Distt. Surguja, ^^^p<<slbattis8alh. ^5^ PETITIONER -fi/' ^H^, ^•ft\ twk 2. 3. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Deptt. ofTribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Collector (Tribal Development), Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Ainbikapur, Distt-Surguja, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE^IATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARi ETC. -HC—78 7S[ '^I^IO^, ^ftWT?, I^TRTy .1^.^...^...^.^. sn^r '^VK (~^t^^) 31i^T''^I^:TRT ^T<ff STT^T'^'TT^ TBHW fltei 3:n^i 31.8,2009 • -Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, coi.jnsel for the petitioner. Shri Vivek Sharma, P.L. for t|-ie State. Challenge in the present 30,6.2009 passed by the responder^ No.3 bywhich the petitioner who is working as Upper Dimsion Teachj Higher Secondary Schooi, Laxin^ Middie School, Guturma, Block Sit^ Contention of the counsei ibi] transfen-ed on the ground that the his transfer whereas no such petitioner. On the other hand, counsel ance witn iaw. petitioner make a representation b^fore the respondent No.3 and the same wouid be considered in accorc To this proposition of the petitioner showed his agreeraent. protection tii' the representation o ithl'!4S<-l'!il-t lTm?ff ^ 'fe'St tFfl^K ^isjRnaii^i petition is to the order dated ir has been transfen'ed from Govt. ngarh, Biock udaipur to Oovt. pur, distt. Surguja, the petitioner is that he has been petitioner has made a request for :quest was ever made by the !for the State submits that let the State counsel, counsel for the Ijlbwever, he prays for an interim f the petitioner is decided by the authorities concemed. Accordingly the petition is d|soosed of with a direction that ii the petitioner makes a reoresentalilon to the authorities concemed within a period of ten days from ijhe date of receipt of copy of the 1 order, the authorities concemed phall decide the saiae within a 1 further period of three weeks from the date of its receipt. Tili then the order impugned shall be kept in atjeyance so far as it reiates to the petiaoner. —-——• 1 sd/. Pritinker Diwaker Judge