IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.18601 OF 2009 DATE OF DECISION: JANUARY 19 ,2011 Santosh Kumari .....Petitioner VERSUS Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board, Panchkula & others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. R. S. Dadwal, Advocate for Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jagdeep Singh, Advocate, for the respondents. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner's services have been regularised in the year 2002 with effect from 1996. The petitioner earlier was dismissed from service and was reinstated pursuant to the award passed by the Labour Court. The payment has been made to the petitioner for the period he remained out of service, as per the award passed by the Labour Court. After regularisation, the petitioner has now made a claim for grant of arrears from the date he has been regularised to the date of regularisation in the year 2002. The petitioner has been allowed notional benefits. The petitioner would be entitled to the payment only CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.18601 OF 2009 :{ 2 }: from the date he is regularised. For the period, he had remained out of service, the petitioner is entitled to receive payment as per the Labour Court award. Merely because he has been regularised with effect from back date would not mean that he would be eligible for payment for arrears for the entire period. Notional benefits have already been given, to which the petitioner was entitled to. I do not see any justification in the claim made by the petitioner. There is no merit in the writ petition. The same is accordingly dismissed. January 19,2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE