IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 14TH JANUARY 2010 / 24TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 31849 of 2009(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- ASHOK L.R., S/O.RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI, MELATHILVEEDU, T.C.64/9(1), AZHANKAL JUNCTION, KARUMAM P.O., (VIA) KARAMANA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 002. BY ADV. SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY BUILDINGS, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, KERALA UTY. FOR R1-3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/01/2010, ALONG WITH WPC NO. 32546 OF 2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C)Nos.32546 & 31849 of 2009 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 14th day of January, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioners in the writ petitions were B.Tech students of SCT College of Engineering, Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner in W.P.(C).No.31849 was assigned 27 marks in the paper Computer Communication for the 8th semester and the petitioner in W.P.(C). No.32546 of 2009 was also assigned only 27 marks. 2. They approached this court for revaluing the answer papers and this court by interim order dated 25/11/2009 directed the Vice Chancellor to look into the matter and take appropriate decision after ascertaining the views of the Chairman of the Board of Studies of the Faculty of Engineering, Kerala University. 3. The report by the Registrar of the University after revaluation has been presented before this court along with a memo by the learned standing counsel for the University. It shows that the petitioners have been assigned 50 and 47 marks respectively after revaluation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that appropriate direction may be issued to reissue the marks list and to effect change in the web site of the University and to issue a provisional certificate to the petitioners after recording the results in the relevant records maintained by the University. W.P.(C)Nos.32546 & 31849 of 2009 2 4. The writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents to re-declare the results of the petitioners after accepting the report showing the marks mentioned in para 3 above. The follow up action will be taken within a period of 2 weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. The petitioners will be issued with fresh mark lists and fresh provisional certificates reflecting the revalued marks as mentioned above. The same will be recorded in the registers of University and the web site of the University. No costs. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE Skj.