@ HIGH ccum‘ m: cHHAWiseAéi-i: EM§PUR wm Petmgn is; No. 3447 $2093 Petitioner Jeevan La§ Yadav, S/o. 8m Amar singh Vadav, aged about 61, Assistant Teacher, Ngvin Primary SchQOJ, Kharsia, weak—Kharsfa, District Raigarh (CG). Versus Resmndents 1) Siate of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Schod The Secretary! Genera} Admmisfration Department; D.K.S. Bhawan, Rapur (CG) Raigarh {CG} Education Department} D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2) ’3) Assisfan‘t Commissi'ener, Raigarh, Distmt 4) Bfock Educaticn Omcer, Kharsia, DistrEct Raigarh (CG) {Writ Petiiion under Articxe 226/227 of the Constitution of india) SB: Hon’bie Mr. $atésh K. Agnihotri, J; Present. \' Shri’ Shri BL. MRS. Dembra, Bhatia, Gev’i counseiferthe Advocate pet'rtioner. far the 8tate @W§L éRaER ‘ (Passed on 4*” day ofduiy, 2008) With consent of both the parties, thevmai‘ter is heard f1na£iy. . 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is eniitied i0 second Kramonnaii as per circuiar dated 2442006 read with 17-3-1999HQ-44999 (Annexure P12) after compietion of 24 years of sen/ice. Learned counsei further submits that the issue invoived in the present petition has aiready been considered and decideo by this Court in the matter of RS. Verma Vs. State of Chhaitisgarh and others (WPNoZEDS/2002) by judgment and order dated 293-2006. Learned counsei iuriher submits ihai the petitioner may be granted iiberiy to make a representation to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon’bie Supreme Court in the matter of State of Tripura and others Vs. KK. Roy (2004 SCVW‘i} and the ; . order passed in RS. Verma (supra), to which teamed oounsei appearing for the respondentsistate has no objection. “ 2) Accordingiy, iiberty sought for by the petitioner is granted to make a representation before the concerned authorities. 3) in View of the above, the petition is disposed of with the a / ,_ Sdl‘ gnmmr" i Satish K. A Raju Judge 77 , w