IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15038 of 2009 SUNIL SHARMA Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 05.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is nephew of the informant. There is litigation in between the parties from earlier and petitioner has been alleged for using (blowing) hasua on scrotum of the informant. Injury, if any, is reserved that is followed by reason of the parties. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Kotwa P.S. Case No. 106 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Motihari, District-East Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)