IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 1ST FEBRUARY 2010 / 12TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 3224 of 2010(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- YOHANNAN S/O.PAULOSE, AGED 55 YEARS, SHINY NIVAS, ANDOOR PO CHERUVALLOOR, UMMANNOOR, KOTTARAKARA. BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. UMMANNOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, UMMANNOOR,KOTTARAKARA. 2. THE MEDICAL OFFICE, P.H.CENTRE UMMANNOOR, KOTTARAKARA. 3. SHAJI S/O.DANIEL @ DHAMODARAN, PALLITHAZHATHIL VEEDU CHERUVALLOOR, UNDOOR PO, UMMANNOOR ,KOTTARAKARA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).3224/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 1st day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT 1. The prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Exts.P1 and P2 where he makes allegations against a construction allegedly made by the 3rd respondent. According to him, despite having made the aforesaid representations, Panchayat is not taking any action. 2. If as stated a complaint has been received, it is upto the 1st respondent to take necessary action. But such action shall only be with notice to the 3rd respondent. Therefore without expressing anything on the merits of the allegations made by the petitioner and leaving it open to the 1st respondent to do the needful in the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to deal with Ext.P1 and P2 with notice to the 3rd respondent. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs