1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI. REVISION APPLICATION NO. 107 OF 2008 (NARU MANI RUSKI TANDI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. DY.SP. ACB, YAVATMAL) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Anjan De, Advocate for applicant. Shri D.B.Patel, A.P.P. for Respondent. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : JANUARY 21, 2009. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor informs that the sanctioning authority has again come to the conclusion that there is no case for grant of sanction. Such letter dated 6th January, 2009, by Director General of Police Shri A.N.Roy has been made available for my perusal, which the learned A.P.P. places on record. It is not for the Special Judge to decide whether the sanction ought to be granted or not. Whether refusal of sanction was justified or not is for a different forum to decide. If there is no sanction, there is no warrant for the Spl. Judge to proceed with the matter. The application is, therefore, disposed of. JUDGE RR.