IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.17430 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 27, 2010. Manoj Kumar Dua .....Petitioner versus Unionof India and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner applied for allotment of LPG distributorship at Pehowa, District Kurukshetra, which has been finally allotted to respondent No.5 by the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited. The petitioner filed a complaint against the above-stated allotment on various grounds which was turned town by the respondent-Corporation vide a self- speaking order dated 9.8.2010, conveyed vide memo dated 25.8.2010 (Annexure P-37), which also highlights as to how the 5th respondent was found more meritorious than the petitioner and other candidates. The petitioner now asserts that as per the information obtained by him under the Right to Information Act, respondent No.5 allegedly did not work in the General Hospital, Karnal w.e.f. 9.8.2007 to 23.8.2007 and the C.W.P.No .17430 of 2010 2 experience certificate relied upon by her for the aforesaid period or the declaration given by way of her affidavit, are factually incorrect. Since in his earlier complaint, this plea was not taken by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to submit another complaint alongwith the necessary documents in support of his allegations, which shall be considered and disposed of by the respondent-Corporation in accordance with law and its policy, as early as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Dasti. September 27, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE