HIGH COURT O CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 4613 of2004 : Khemaram Mehar S/o Shn' Goram Mchar Aged about 33 years Caste Mehar (Schedule Caste) R/o Village Nishda, Gram Panchayat Nishda, Block Arang, District Raipur (CG). : l, State Election Commission Through the Commissioner, Rair (CG). 2. The Appellate Authon'ty cum Sub Disional ‘ Officer (Revenue), Raipur (CG) (under the provision of Rule 12 (5) of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Nirvachan Niyam, 1995). 3. The Assistant egistration Omcer cum \ ahsilar, Arang, Tahsil Arang District Raipur (CG). 4. Toshram Sahu S/o Shri Kejauram Sahu, aged about 45 years, R/o village Nishda, Gram Panchayat Nishda, Block Arang, District Raipur e (CG) 5. Sanjay Vasnik S/o Shri Shivji Vasnik, Aged about 41 years Gram Panchayat Nishda, block Arang, District Raipur (CG). (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITION OF INDIA) ’ gg'’ Present S (SB: Honble Mr. Satish K. éhotrg J.) : Shn' Rakesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. hri Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent No.1to3. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. (Passed on 22“ day of September, 2008) The petitioner has filed this petition impugning the order ted 02.112004 (Annexure P/i ), passed b the Sub Divisional icer (Revenue) in Appwl No. 268/B/121; whereby, the Assistant Election Registration Omcer (Panchayat Nirvachan) was directed to make necessary amendments as the name of the petitioner was deleted from the voter list. F PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS pu iv R Td TU ORAL ORDER ~ “ da y Oh :w This Court, by order dated 23.12.2004, passed an interim relief staying the operation and implementation of the impugned order dated 02,1 1.2004. Subsequently thereon, proper election was held in the month of January, 2005. There was no challenge to the election. Thus, the impugned order dated 02.11.2004 has become infruetuous with the passage oftime. If any grievance still survives, the petitioner can make a representation for inclusion of his name in the voter list. In view of the subsequent development, it would be a futile exercise to adjudicate upon the issue which has become academic as on facts the petition has become infiuctuous. Thus, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infruetuous. No order as to costs. Sci/- Salish K. Agnihotn' Judge i5; ,.