IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8153 of 2006 Between: B.Ramanjaneyulu ..... PETITIONER AND The Revenue Divisional Officer, Penukonda, Ananthapur District. and another. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.RAJANIKANTH JWALA Counsel for the Respondenta: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RS} HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.8153 of 2006 & W.P.M.P.No.10419 of 2006 ORDER: When W.P.M.P.No.10419 of 2006 is posted for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. Ordinarily, the interim application alone would have been dismissed in default, but the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration because the writ petition is filed questioning the suspension of the petitioner’s authorization pending enquiry and that by order dated 29-08-2006, respondent No.1 cancelled the authorization of the petitioner after enquiry. The learned Assistant Government Pleader passed on a copy of the said order to the Court. Having perused the said order, I am satisfied that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. As a sequel to dismissal of writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.10419 of 2006 is dismissed as infructuous. _______________________ Date: 08-06-2009 C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J KVR