IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 10081 of 1991 H.C. Yashpal Singh ...Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others ...Respondents Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the State. RANJIT SINGH J. The prayer made in the writ petition is to direct the respondents to detail the petitioner for Intermediate School Course, which was to commence w.e.f. 01.07.1991. The ground was that respondents No. 6 to 8, who were junior to the petitioner, had passed the said course, which was commenced on 01.11.1991. While admitting the writ petition, this was ordered to be heard alongwith CWP No. 6373 of 1991. Interim direction was also issued directing the respondents to depute the petitioner to Intermediate School Course henceforth provisionally. This arrangement was subject to the decision of the writ petition. Civil Writ Petition No. 6373 of 1991 was taken up for hearing on 09.05.1994 and was disposed of as having become infructuous because the claim of the petitioner for being deputed on the course stood fully satisfied. The operative part of the order passed in CWP No. 6373 of 1991 as under:- “ The petitioners who are working as Head Constables approached this Court with a prayer that they be deputed for the Intermediate School Course, which Civil Writ Petition No. 10081 of 1991 -2- was to commence on May 1, 1991. By an interim direction, the Motion Bench directed the respondents to depute the petitioners for the course. It is admitted that all of them were deputed for the Course have completed it. As a result, the claim of the petitioners so far as this prayer is concerned is fully satisfied. Learned counsel for the parties are further agreed that the claims of the petitioners for further promotion etc. should be considered in order of their seniority and according to law. The writ petitions are accordingly disposed of with the direction that the claims of the petitioners for further promotion etc. shall be considered accordingly to the Rules in order of their seniority. There will be no order as to costs.” Since this writ petition was ordered to be heard alongwith CWP No. 6373 of 1991 and is identically placed, this writ petition also disposed of in the same terms as per the order passed in CWP No. 6373 of 1991. Ordered accordingly. September 09, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE