S 1 ‘4 I I I I ‘I S ) P —2— 4, SrI, H,S, Praveen Kumar, maor 4 5, sri, u.s, Rajesh, major, All ar• sons of late Shivarudrappa, All residents of No, 285, Coma Iyengar i.oad, Vis weswarapuram., B angalora—4, ,, Respondents H,R,R,P, to €jth TJ/ sg(i) of the KR8 Act against tnaorcar uated 17,1,1998 psssea n hAl No, of fl97 on toe iie of the XI AldI, Judpe, Court of Small causes, B angalo.re, This H,R,i,P, coming on for admission this day, the Court made the following: ORDER Petitioner filed an apniication under Sac, 19 of the rarnara Rent Control Act seeking to denosit the monthly rents, This 4 4.1 This application was read S t.ed ty the Ian lord and the learned Judne rejected the annlication on the ground that the tenant has not croduced any material to show that th.e landlcrd refused to. p.ay the rents. i am in agreement with the findings of t.he learned Judge as it is well known that one of the re—requisites for deoositing the rents under Sec.i9t% is that th.e tenant must atteapt h pay the rents cC tne ianciorc either cy Money Order or as is provided under the Rent Control Act, It is only on his refusal to acce 1 t, he is entitled to make an anolication, ground. Rejected. Sd!— Judcsa Ms Rdf3y: LdL_ C,By: Agetqtnt Registrar ‘Tifl Court of Rarastaka - Sanga1oreso aol \ a