IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.306 of 2011 MURARI RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 18.05.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioner is declared juvenile in conflict with law. Earlier he had approached this Court for bail in Cr. Rev. no. 635 of 2010 which was considered and rejected by order dated 06.07.2010 (Annexure-1). The allegation attributed to the petitioner can be seen from the said order. This Court, considering his period of lodgment in the remand home had granted liberty to renew prayer for bail after 07 months if the trial, in the meanwhile, is not concluded by examining all prosecution witnesses. Petitioner has now renewed his prayer for bail. A status report was called for from the concerned Court which is placed at Flag-A. It appears therefrom that charges were framed on 05.05.2010 under Sections 376, 302/34 of the Penal Code and four prosecution witnesses have thereafter been examined. Steps are afoot to examine rest of the prosecution witnesses. Considering the submissions of the parties and on perusal of the materials on record, this Court, while declining the prayer for bail, disposes of this application by the following order:- Let the Court below complete examination of remaining prosecution witnesses within 04 months from the date of receipt/ 2 production of a copy of this order, failing which the trial Court shall release the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Juvenile Justice Board, Sitamarhi, in connection with G.R.No. 579 of 2009/Tr. No. 556 of 2010, arising out of Riga P.S. case no. 38 of 2009, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors should be the own/close family member of the petitioner. (ii) It shall be the duty of the said bailor to produce him before the Court in person as and when directed therefor. In case of default in such appearance, the trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Court below through Fax at the cost to be deposited by the petitioner. Sym (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)