IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 23RD JULY 2009 / 1ST SRAVANA 1931 RP.No. 685 of 2009(T) ------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.6000/2009 Dated 19/03/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION ----------------------------------------------------- T.J.IVANHOE (LOAN NO,TS XII2/APLY)KULLUMALA PO, VIA.MAVELIKKARA ALAPPUZHA DIST. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS ------------------------------------------------ 1. THE KERALA STATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR SC & ST LTD REP.BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER(A KERALA GOVT.UNDERTAKING) REGIONAL OFFICE NEAR NSS COLLEGE, PANDALAM PO, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST.PIN:689 501. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,, KERALA STATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR SC & ST LTD, HEAD OFFICE, THRISSUR. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SC&ST DEVELOPMENT (E) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 4. THE TAHSILDAR(RR), MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DIST. 5. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THAZHAKKARA VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DIST. R.P.NO.685/09 6. PS.THOMAS, S/O. T.D.SAMUAL, KALATHIL THAZHEKKARA, (VIA) MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DIST. R1 & R2 BY SHRI M.K. CHANDRAMOHAN DAS R3 TO R5 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI K.B. RAMANAND. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- R.P.NO.685 OF 2009 IN W.P.C. NO. 6000 OF 2009 T -------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd July, 2009 ORDER On the basis of the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking to pay off the amount in instalments, the Writ Petition was disposed of permitting the petitioner to pay off the amount in instalments and also directing that the second respondent will serve a Statement on the petitioner showing the exact amount of instalments to be paid. In the Review Petition, it is stated, inter alia, that the Statement was not given. A Statement has been filed on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 wherein it is stated that the petitioner was supplied with a detailed Statement of Accounts by registered post on 13.5.2009 with acknowledgment due. Whatever that be, I feel that no ground is made out for reviewing the Judgment. Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge WPC 2