HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.19702 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.09.2011 **** Sandeep Kaur . . . . Petitioner VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. KPS Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG Punjab **** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The petitioner seeks her appointment on the post of DPE (Education Service Provider). Her merit admittedly is 61.40% whereas according to the respondents, the merit of the last selected candidate in female general category is 64.543%. The petitioner still insists that candidates lower in merit have been given appointment. (2). Having regard to the said plea taken by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of, at this stage, with a direction to the respondents to verify and if any candidate in female general category below merit point 61.40% has been given appointment, to consider the claim of the petitioner for her appointment to the subject post within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (3). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. CWP No.19702 of 2009.doc - 2 – 13.09.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge 2