003 IN THE HON'BLEHIGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION Nojn^2006 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ., Dr. Prafulla Sharma S/o Late Shri B.L. Sharma, aged about 46 years, presently working and poSted at Medical Officer, 8th Battalion (I.R.) District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS -c 1. State of Chhattisgatrh through it's Secretary, Department of Health & Family Welfare, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) » ,/ y-'i. The Director, Health Services, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur(C.G.) ,' 3. The Under Secretary, Department of Health & Family Welfare, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur(C.G.) ^ 4. The Superintendent of Police, Police Training School Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) '^-. •• WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICJ-E226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER HIGMCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J WRIT PETITION N0.1174 OF 2006 Petitioner Dr. Prafulia Sharma Versus ' Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others Present :- ShriSameerBehar,counselforthepetitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (Passed on 25tn Mareh, 20QS) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Medical Officer. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the name of the petitioner has been omitted in the gradation list of Medical OfRcers dated 1-4-2005. The petitioner has made representation dated 26-2-2004 to respondent No.2, thereafter the petitioner has made one more representation on 8-12-2005 to respondent No.2 and the representation was also made to respondent No.1 on 17-5-2005. Despite severai representations, the petitioner could not get any response form the concerned Officers. The name of the petitioner has wrongiy not been mentioned in the gradation list dated 1-4-2005. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner confines his submission for considering the representaiions already made by the petitioner on 26-2-2004, S-12-20CB & 17-5-2005 (Annexure-P/3 collectiveh/). Learned counsei appearing for the respondents has no objection. In view of the above, the respondents No.1 & 2 are directed to consider and decide the above stated representations of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. IT any grievance survives, the petitioner is at liberiy to file appropriate petition/application. tn view of the foregoing, the petitioh stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Consequently, M.fW.).P.No.913/2006 also stands disposed of. GOWR! Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge -—^.