HiGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BiLASPUR Writ Petition (Si No. 2902 of 2007 Petitioners 9 Respondents 3. Versus 1. 2. 3. IVIohan La! Chauhan S/o Shri Baratu Ram Chauhan, aged about39 years, Working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary Sohool Ssrsipail, block GhsrgiiOds, Dlst. Ralgarh (C.G.) Malikram Nayak S/o Shri Puranjan Prasad Nayak, aged about 38 years, Working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Pordi, Block Gharghoda, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) Gunnidhi Dubey S/o Shri Muchkund Dubey, aged about 39 years, Working as Assistant Teacher, Govt. H.S. School Bhupdevpur, Block Kharsia, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) State of Chhattisgam Through the Seoretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.5 Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raigam, Tahsil and District (C.G.) Collector, Raigarh, Tahsil and District- Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTiCLE 22S OF THE CONSTiTUTION Hon'ble Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Fvir. Santosh K. Ti'/i'ari, Advooate for the petitioners. IVIr. Vinay Pandey, Panel lawyerforthe respondents/State. n B/- (Passed on this 9 day of May, 2007$ 1. The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitionere are entitled to regular pay soale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law invoived in the present writ petition are the same to that of in W.P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others Vs. State Qovernment of Chhattisgarh and others), whioh was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. 3. In view ofthe above submissions made by learned oounsel appearing for the parties, the vi/rit petit'on is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge