1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 600 of 2010 [Anil Shriram Deshmukh Vs. State of Mah.] With Criminal Application No. 637 of 2010 [Sandeep Santosh Kute Vs. State of Mah.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Criminal Application No. 600/2010 : Mr. V.M. Deshpande, Adv., for the Applicant. Mr. V.A. Thakre, APP for respondent. ----- Criminal Application No. 637/2010 : Mr. V.M. Deshpande, Adv., for the Applicant. Mr. V.A. Thakre, APP for respondent. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 30th April, 2010. 1. These are two applications for bail. 2. The applicants have been named as accused persons in Crime No. 92/2009 for offences punishable under Sections 364, 302 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code registered with Police Station, Dongaon, Distt. Buldana. 3. Heard learned Adv. Mr. V.M. Deshpande for the applicants and learned APP Mr. V.A. Thakre for the respondent. 2 4. Perused the charge-sheet and documents annexed thereto. 5. The applicants claim that they have no role in the commission of offence. 6. The applicant – Anil Deshmukh in Cri. Appln. No. 600 of 2010 claims that he runs a Pan Kiosk, and his role, as alleged, is that he has communicated the demand of amount. 7. It is seen from record that what is said to be the version of this applicant is that he knew that the amount was to be recovered; failing which the person kidnapped was to be killed. 8. It is, therefore, clear that Applicant - Anil Deshmukh cannot be said to be barely named to receive money without his knowing the parties for which amount was accepted. 9. In the result, the applicant – Anil Deshmukh has no case. 10. In so far as bail application, namely Criminal Application No. 637 of 2010, of Applicant - Sandeep Santosh Kute is concerned, the imputations against him are of the act of kidnapping. 11. It is nowhere emerging that the applicant – Sandeep was unaware of the facts for which Dinkar Arjun Karhale was being kidnapped. 3 12. In these premises, at this stage, this Court finds that there is ample material on record against both applicants about their involvement in the offence. 13. In the result, both applications have no merit, and are rejected. Judge |Hedau|