^ •('> ^^...^.c^ .^°-'"l'u<^-r1,l.1-- ^!Sf-a ^••••••" BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P (S) No. (!^<^ of 2010 PETITIONER 7 Devnarayan Pal, S/o Late ^Shri Baraturam, aged about 51 ^ears, Upper Division Tescher, Government Girls Middle School. Karhibhadar, Blocls?Balod, Distrjci- Durg (C.G.) ^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^:; :1.^Sfate of Chhattisgarh, Through : ths ^ Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, F^aipur (C.G.) 2. ^Drstrict Education Officer, DUTR, DistrictDurg(C.G.) S^BIock Education Officer, Balod, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Biock- 1 r'^ ^s. \ IS ^ '^.•^.'.^•^ft-'^: & "W^" ~'| A. /j^ I-HC—78 sv^i w R'fi'*. ?fSH 3?T^T sb^icb d-°=i •<<i<ii<iti, ^Til'M'is, R<<?fi'yli< _........^.e.^^.: .:.!°^t€?, ..^...,.......»^...*..-.-.....-..^^QQ sii^i'tRw ('^rfg^tt) ICTW ^ifta OT^I SB : HON'BLE MR. JU8TICE PflSITINKER DIWAKBR Shri Gautaia Khetrapal, c Shri Suinesh Bajaj, G.A. f<|>r fhe State. Grievaiice of the petitioB{ petitioner has joined his servii): Teacher (Atuiexure P/ 1) howeve ofjoiiung has beea showa as 7,^ showing of uicorrect date of services are Ekely to silffer seri^iis consequences aad therefore at fhis stage, he inay be perBJutted to wifhdraw tiie present petition aiid direction niav be isj needful. He submits fhat fhe |peti.tioner has already made a *i<<I<n*iti TFR^f ^f 1^'^ <f^f^i< ^? sifiiH sii^r )iinsel for the petitioner. ;r in fhis petition is that fhe •es on 23.7.1980 as Assistanl , ia the sen/ice record, his da.tc .1982 (Annexure P/3). Counsel for the petitionfjr subniits fhat on accoiuit of joiniag of the petitioner, his ued to fhe resp. N0.2 to do the representation on 25.10.2010 t(ji fhe resp. No.3 but fhe saine is penduig. State coiuisel subniits tijiat he has no objection if the representation of the peti.tio4er is beiag decided by fhe coinpetent aufh.ority. He howev^r subiuits fhat let the petitioner laake a fi-esh representation detjalmg his claim. to fhe resp. No.2 aEter supplying the copy of tb^ same to ttie respondent N0.3 aad in tura his reoresentatit>n would be decided bv the coinpetent autliority expeditiou^ly. Accordiagly, the petitionejr is persiitted to withdraw this petition wifh liberty to inake ja fresh representation. IN fb.e pwpTihialiiy nfmnWng f^py suchll^picsentation bv ttie petitioner Jf '<f^i-HC-78 •'fess?^^ ~?:sr "^itKf^, (SiTil'y'ie, fsldi'y^i £7..^4...N».^.c^,^ sn^T'1!^? ('i°it3««t*?) 3)1^1 'aff Ri-< 'tTsfr sn^TsRTn^ TOIIW^ltosiI^T to the resp. No. 2 wifhia a peric of receipt of copv of fhis order. authority concemed within a It is raade clear that fbis opinion on nierits of ffcie casel would be at liberty to decide accordauce wifh law considenu^ |d of fhree weeks &om the date t^ie saiiie sha]l be decided by the fuxjther period oftwo inonfhs. Court has not expressed any and the authori.tv con.cemed the representation strictly in. aU ftie aspect ofthe case. <!ni<lf^(*n'! TnTT?ff ^T 1^^' tf^'i't^R ^3fRtH3II^T[ Sd/- PritinkerD^akar Judge