‘N IF I XII I RN lIT Tl34Ms Md OMIt) His it a L)4Y1 ILl) 1 ‘3h.F J4 lk iIoVBL’ MR it SlTt t A.s E\ t T (i )PAL tO’ADA MISC hI INEOL s I k Al PEA Nc) 2q63 I Nil i BE1WEEZ.. B L BALkKlucH2A. s/fl B. LAKKEGCfliDA. ICiE o7PRS AMBEDKAR CIRCLE. BET UR TOWN, BFLUR Bl’IUR ALUK P11% - 3 15 14 (H rl.PI ,-iDV) Fj 4N1, nT MA i3oW, ) 1 41 %KhC ft 1% 1 TB ‘- ior ri CHOOI 1F 1 51 LS’%(.A (_I. e.i; • “i’, r p ! .‘ ii . -I Mc P ‘I S M.FANo2963/ 11 3, NINGEGOWDA. S/0 B. LAKKEGOWDA, AGE: 50 YE•ARS, lAUD IGERE ROAD, BELCR TOWN. BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT PIN. 573 115, 4. B.L. BILL 5/0 LAKKEGOWDA, A:CE: 64 YEARS. 5. B,L. THIMMAMMA, W/O NINGAPPA, AGE: 70 YEARS. 6. B.L. DHARMEGOWDA, 5/0 LATE B . LAKKEGOWDA, AGE: 55 YEARS. RESPONDENTS 4 TO 6 ARE R/ 0 RANAKADASA STREET, BELUR TOWN, BELUR ‘IALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT. PIN— 573 115. B U W/O ICH. SANNEGOWDA, AGE: 60 YEARS. R/O RATN•AGIRJ ROAD. KEMPANAFIALLI. CHIKIvIAGALUK TOWN, CHIIKAMAGALUR TALUK, PIN -577 101 ‘a YASHODHA, W/O MULLEGOWDA, AGE: 52 YEARS.. R/O. NEHRU NAGAR, BEL..UR TOW N. BELUJR — 573 115. MEANo2963/i I 9. ELL. BHANUMATE.I, 5/0 MARIGGEDA, AGE . •: 47 YERS, R/O SUSHASHNAGAR, iC4DUR TOWN. IKADUR TALOK. cH’CK\fl\GALG’? Or-i RIG’ PIN — 577 548. 10. SI. GOPAL. S/0 LATE B. LAKKEOOWDA, AGE•: 45 YEARS, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, TOWN PLANNING DEPARTME..NT, MooaA, MYSORE CITY, MYSORE DISTRCT PIN— 570 001. 5.5. MANJtJNAT5 S/O BILLEOOWDA, AGE: 32 YEARS;, GUNIKERE STREET. BELUR TOWN. HASSAN DISTRICT PLN— 573 115. 12. AKRAMSHERIFF, S/O ANWARPASHA, AGE: 42 YEARS, R/O PURIBHA47I STREET, BELUR; TOWN. RASSAN r)ISTPTrT PIN - fl’; I to. (Ply Sri. N.R. IPAIPI & .ASSOC1ATES, Advocate Icr C / R 1) COPY MFANo2963/i.i. 4 This IV! PA •.Dcd U / Order 4.3 Rule 1 of CPC against the Juogncent arid Decree cit 0701 20 11 assed in U.S. No. 1 5/2000 00 toe TOCO the Seroor CivtI Jo rtne & MAOT. Belor. This MsceHaneous Burst Appeal is comm on for Orders on the ibis bar, the Court made the toilowina ORDER Sri. B.S Prasad. learned Counsel apoearmg Jor the appellant. sobntits th.at the appeal may he rc.turned for re presentation hefore the District Court at Hassan, whic.i.c has the pecuniary jorisdicdon in the matter. Office has raised oijeetion with regard to the appeiia.nt having not fbrni.shed the correct valuation. In view of the suhmissicn made by the learned counsel, the office objection. is opheld. Let the appeal papers be returned to the appellant t or preseuttan.on before t.hr. ,jurisdict.ional District Court The COPY tYD OLUt.. (Sigh Court of (On ha Ba iokeThj* OOt /1. jL .5? ) MFAJSoOY63/ii 5 appellant to obtain t,he papers within one week and rcapresent thesarne before the iurisdie.tional Court wit.hir[ one week from JR date of obtaining of the return of the papers. Sd/ - JUDGE T Br: EL R Ej: CBv:t(