^ 1 ^?- S("8toBwt<* IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR rc.G.^ W.P.fS) N0. ^2-3° 72010 PETITIONER : ..-•' ^. •>y €^y ' ^cy'^' ^r' RESPONDENTS Raja Ram Yadav aged about 53 years, S/o- Panjalal, Permanent mate (Gangman), posted at Sub Division Pamgarh, Public Wprks Department District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) R/o- village- Sheorinarayan, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Public Works, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Sub- Division Pamgarh, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. VERSUS 1. 2. ^ HIGH COUR:] OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON (S) No. 2230 of2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Atsnih®tai,J. Present: Shri KS.Khare, Advocate fbr the petttumer. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Dy. A.O for fhe State/re^)0t»4ents, i ORDERrORAD^.,,- ...——...-.... ^K^ - (Passed on 06UI day dfMay, ^OIQ) , , 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on mstructions, submits that the petitioner does not warrt to corrtest this pelition oiiiiierite atthis stage. However, he praysthatlfae respondent authorities may be direeted to consider and decide the pending representatiandated 25/06/2009 (Annexure P/5) as expeditiously as possible. 2. Shri V,V.8.Moorthy^ leamed counsel appearmg for Ifae State/ respondents submits that in the event, the rqM-eseartation, as aforestated, is pendmg consideratioii, the same shall be coiisidered aiad decided in accordance wilh law, on its own merit and perspective, wftfain a p^iod 'A- ofeight weeks from fhe date ofreceipt ofa copy oflNs oi^ 1» 3. In view ofthe above, accordmg to leamed coiuisel appearmg for tfae petitioner, nothing ssundves for adjudication in tius petitkMt at tfais^|age. 4, Accordingly, fhe writ petition is disposed of. Ashok Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge PETmONER : |RajaRamYadav VERSUS :..^:.;.1....^^ RESPQNDENTS StateQfaihMtisgarhftaHotfi^^^^^