^')-IS^- IN THE HIGH COURTOFCHHArTISGAIlH ATs BILASPUR ^^ S-A. No. ^-7^ .I^@^%1"1 'j^y^'' OF 2009 Suit valuedRS. 600.00 F.A. valued RS. 600.00 S.A. valued RS. 600.00 Court fee affixed RS. i36.00 Court feeaffixed RS. 136.00 Court fee affixed RS. 136.00 APPELLANTS: .^ ^-, Wl Roop Chaad sonofDalganjan Braliman (dead) through the legal represeiitatives - Jitendra Kumar Paiidey aged 28 years, son 6f Shri Roop Chand, 2. Smt. Sarojini Devi aged 55 years wife oflate Shri Roop Chand, 3. Asha Lata Pandey aged 21 years daughter 6f Shri Roop Chand, All are residents of village Charidaniyapara, Ghampa road, Janjgir, tahsil Janjgir; district Jaiijgir-Chatnpa (G.G.) 4. Rekha Dubey aged 30 years, daughter of Shri Roop Chand Pandey, resident ofSakti, tahsil Sakti, district Janjgir-Champa, 5. Ratna Tiwari aged 34 years, daughter of Shri Roop Chand Pandey, resident of village Khisora, tahsil Nawagarh, district Janjgir-Champa, 6. Durga Tiwari aged 31 years, daughter of Shri RoQp Chand, resident pf village Amora, tahsil Nawagarh, distnGt Jaajgir- Champa(C.G.) (Aimellants/Defendants) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. Gore Lal aged 63 years, son ofRam Sahay Dubey, 2. Badra Bai aged 61 years, wife ofGore Lal, Both are residents of village Nariyara, at present Budhwari Bazar, Nehru Nagar, Korba, district K9rba (C.G.) tPlaintiffe/Resoorfdents) 3. State of Chhattisgarh through the District CoUeetor, JanJgir-Champa (C.G.) fDefendant No. 2/ReSDOUdentt SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OFTHE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1908- ^•^^^^ *<I*ICTI n»*ii<i» ~3"osr ^ii^Kn^, ^Til^^Ko, [®i<ni<H^< „..£..&.,.. "^200^ ^?r ^^F (yl^^) ^i^i^T'ft^te ^CT 31T^T $FqN5> .u- rs<^ -<L].. Sahu I^HW^f?^ 3^T^T S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. A^arwal 15.06.2009 None appears for the appella^its. Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Panel ^avvyer for the State. The matter i.s called for hetiring twice. On both occasions, none appears nor any represents^ion is made on behalf of the appellants. The appellants may not In view of the above, the prosecution. ^RfeN^ w^ff "^ fe^ <F3i'^.K ^ ^^ ^T^T be interested in the matter. iiatter is dismissed for want of Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge ^iy^-} ^k ^«<?i^<M-1K*IM—FS/95—11 /2008—1,00,000.