1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.88 OF 2009 IN L.P.A.NO.172 OF 2007 AND W.P.NO.344 OF 2006 (D). Sumitra Motiram Gedam ..vs.. Mahesh Karasgaonkar and others. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- C ORAM : C.L.PANGARKAR, J. DATED : 12th November, 2009. Heard Mr.A.Shelat, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.Gaikee, learned counsel for the respondents. Read the affidavit filed by respondent no.1. In paragraph no.4 of the said affidavit, respondent no.1 has specifically mentioned that the entire amount of non-salary grant available in the account of Management has been paid to the petitioner. It is further mentioned that as and when non-salary grant is available, the amount payable to the petitioner shall be paid. In view of this, nothing survives in the petition. The Contempt proceedings are, therefore, dropped 2 with liberty to the petitioner to approach this court if the amount as undertaken is not paid within a reasonable time. JUDGE. Chute