(,g (xv/k IN THE HIGH COURT OF CiiHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ( C G ) , — 2é§£> f wRI'r PETITxoN No. OF 2003 Anil Kumar Gawande, Sm: o£ Pundlik Raa Gawande. aged abaut 42 years warkirg a3 A.S.I. g“ ( Matsr Transport Department ) 4’ Range a Felice Motar workshop, Bilaspur, Police Line, Bilaspur ( C G )o 1. Union af India, thraugh the Secretary, Department ces and Pensien, of Pe rsanm l/Fublic Grievan- Third Flaar, is]: Nayak Ehawan, Khan Market, New Delhi» RESFONDENTS The Advisory Committae ( Pre$ided «Var by Shri Inh Ccmtituted Under Sectian 71 of the MoP. R¢arganisati¢n Act, 2000, Department of General Administraticn, Vallabh Ehawan. Bhopal. ‘ MoPo ’. state ‘f Ma&wa Pradesh, through : The Se¢mtary, Department ef Heme Affairs Vallabh Bhawan, Bh’pil ( MtPc ). state ef Chhattisgarh threugh z The Secretary, Department o£ Hame Affairs, Mantralaya, DoK.s. Buildirg Riipur ( CoGo ,c x’ (’ / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226(21’1 OF m CONSTI'IUTION '* OF INDIA 2/- a M HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH AT BILASPUR single geach: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihetri. Writ P€titi011 NO. 260,3 of2003 Petiticmsr Anil Kumsu' Gawande Vsrsu$ R€sp0nd€nt3 UniQn of India & others Shri Rajndra Tripafhi, Acivocate for fhe pefitionar. Shri S. K. Bm‘iwal, Standing counSel for Respondent No‘ 1‘ 3111i Sachin Shgh Rajlaut for Rsspmident N0. 2 85 3 Shri Pankaj Shn'vastava, Panel lawyer for the respondent No. 4. ORAL ORDER ( 8th Februay, 2006) The follmvmg order of the Court was passed by $atish K Agilmtri J 1) Learned caunsel appearing fer the petitioner submits that the petitioner was werkhg as ASJ. in the Range Police Motor Workshop, Bilaspur, The petitioner is permanent resident of the district in me State of Madhya Pradesh. The petitioner has been allocated to the State of Chhattisgarh and he wants his reallocation to the State. of Madhya Pradesh. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that the petitioner be granted liberty to make a representation to the respondents for redressal of his gn'evances. Learned cmmsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to the said submission. og In View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of finally, with E3 libei‘ty to the petitioner to make an appropriate repreeentation to the respondents/authonties concerned, Within a period of two Weeks from today, and the respondentsjauthorities are dinected to consider and decide the same in an objective manner, in accordance With law Within a penod of eiaht weeks fiom the date of ieceipt of the representation 1f any ~{A /./3 Certified copy, as per Rules. // sdf_ ‘\“x Satlsh K 1 g omx t Judge ’I‘hakur f