IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.1914 OF 2009 PETITION NO.1914 OF 2009 PETITION NO.1914 OF 2009 Shree Sankeshwar Premises Co-op. Society Ltd ..Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors ..Respondents. Mr Satyajeet Mirajkar, i/b Gabriel Pillai, Advocate for the Petitioners. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 06.02. 2009. 06.02. 2009. 06.02. 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. Perused petition. 2. This petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order dated 20th October, 2008, passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai Division, Mumbai confirming the order passed by the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies C-Ward, Mumbai whereby the application for membership moved by the Respondent No.6 is allowed. 3. Having seen the reasons recorded in the impugned order and the concurrent findings recorded by both Authorities below, no fault can be found with the view taken. There was no reason for the Petitioners-Society to reject an application for membership moved by the Respondent No.6-Applicant, which was in accordance with the rules and bye-laws of the Petitioners-Society. The resolution rejecting application is not on record. After having gone through the dispute and the material available on record, it is not difficult to infer that rejection of the application for membership of the Petitioners-Society was not in accordance with the provisions of the Law. 4. In the above view of the matter, no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. Petition is, therefore, dismissed in limini. No order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, (V.C.DAGA, J.) J.) J.)