IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Review (T) No. 19 of 2008. Decided on: 29th October, 2010. Inder Sain. ….Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and Others. .…Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Ms. Salochana Kaundal, Advocate vice Mr. O.P. Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): There is no error apparent on the face of record. Moreover, the petitioner had already attained the age of superannuation. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 29, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?