1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION LODGING NO. 727 OF 2009 Shakuntala Sakharam Karde & ors. : Petitioners. Versus State of Maharashtra & ors. : Respondents. Mr. Y E Mooman with Manisha B Gawade for the Petitioners. Mr. A Y Bookwala a/w Mr.Snehal Shah i/by Y R Shah for the Respondent No.4. Mr.G W Mattos, AGP, for the State. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & R.M.SAVANT, JJ DATED : APRIL 23, 2009 P.C. 1. Affidavit in Reply is filed on behalf of the Respondent No.4 to which decision dated 03/03/2009 taken by the Executive Engineer is annexed. The said decision has been communicated to the counsel for the Petitioners. However, the learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that this cannot be said to be a decision in connection with the bogus tenancy. 2 2. In our view, so far as the question of bogus tenancy is concerned, the Petitioners cannot be said to be affected in any manner as ultimately the Petitioners are getting area to which they are entitled in the newly constructed building. The Petitioners may now shift at the newly allotted premises. If there is any deficiency of any nature, the Petitioners can ask Respondent No.4 to rectify the same. It is made clear that if the Petitioners have any grievance against Respondent No.4 regarding some individual agreement, if any, of any nature, the Petitioners can approach appropriate civil forum in this behalf. 3. Considering the aforesaid facts, we see no reason to entertain with this petition any further as newly constructed premises are already ready for occupation and the Petitioners can occupy the same without further delay. Subject to whatever stated above, the above Writ Petition is disposed of. Notice is accordingly discharged. [R.M.SAVANT,J] [P.B.MAJMUDAR,J] 3