^ 2 1 Ashok Kuiuar Khaperdy, Age about 37 yeare, U.D.T. S/o Shri Ghanshyam Khaperdy Middle School, Kuinlllee Block - Loliandiguda Distt.- Bastar (C.G.) 2 Narendra Kumar Dewangaa Age aboiit 37 years, Head Master S/o Shri N.R. Dewaagaa Prunaiy School Parapur Block - Lohaadiguda Distt.- Bastai' f^ /~1 C/.U-. 3 Chaitaa Ram Kashyap Age about 36 years, Astt. Teacher S/o SIiri Lakhaiiu Rain Kashyap Pi-imar}' School Negh-asa Block - Lohaiidiguda Distt.- Bastar (C.G.) 4 Niraajaa Das Age about 42 years, Astt. Teacber S/o Late Shri Natiibhushaa Das Middle Scliool Kothiyaguda Block - Lajihaad^uda Distt.- Bastar (C.G.) 5 Sint. Nisha Awashfhi Age about 47 years, Astt. Teacber Vi//o Shri Preni Shankar Awashthi Primar)' School Pariyaguda Block - Lohandiguda Distt. Bastar(C.G.) 6 Virendra Kuiaar Kashyap Age about 36 years, Astt. Teacher S/o Shri Maaglu Raxa Kasliyap Piisiaiy School, Gadhiya Block - Lohandiguda Distt. - Bastai-(C.G.) 7 Bali Ram Mouiy Age about 36 years, Astt. Teacher S/o Shri Rupdhai- Mouiy Priiaaiy School, Chaikiguda Block Lohaiidiguda Distt. - Bastar (C.G.) 8 Siat. Saroj Mandavi Age about years, Astt. Teacher W/o Satrughan Lal Maadavi Prim.ary School Patel - Pandaripani Block - Jagdalpur, Distt. - Bastar (C.G.) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretaiv Tribal Welfare Department fe Education Depaitmeat D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt. - Raipur(C.G.) Astt. Coinra.issiou.er Officer Tribal Welfare Department Distt. - Bastar sr^ r~*- \ (^.U.j Distt. Education Officer Jagdalpur, Distt. - Bastsu' (C.G.5 •/:s^ffs'^^yfy;S^5^ W.P.CS) No;5695/2007 ^ 'i^^ *'.,:; 4 Block Education Officer Jagdalpur/ Lohaadiguda Distt. Bastar (C.G.) 5 Treasury, Accouiits & Pension Distt. - Bastar (C.G.) Shri Ajay Shrivaatava, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Pauel Lawyer for the State on advauce copy. Heard on adiaission. Leanied coiinsel for tiae petitioners subniits that fhe petitioners Iiave passed D.Ed. examxnation on fheir own expenses, therefore, tliey are entitled to receive tR7o advance iiicrenients accordiag to circulars dated 24.12.1998 aitd 01.03.1999. He also subniits that in m.aay identical niatters, fh.e petitions Iiave been aUowed iii terrus of the order passed ia ;ca rlS(<ai=' .^/ ^-/ C"I.\^<1^ £ ;;. He subniits tliat the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the said Judgiaent. Tbis legal position is not disputed by tlie leamed coiinsel for the State. However, he submits fhat fhe order Biay be passed ui teniis of the said judgiaent, but it shaU be subjected to vei-iilcation regardiag petitioners' such qiiali&cation. Accordiagly, tliis writ petition is aUowed ia terms of tlie order passed in. case of Yashwant KuTnar Bharadwaj Vs. Munidpal CoTporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification of fhe facts as to whefher the petitioners had acquired D.Ed. Examiaation Certi&cates on thetr own. expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999 and fijrther (^ whether they have been paid tevo advauce uicreiaents or not. The petition stands fmally disppsed of. No order as to costs. vam Sd/- Synii Kumar Sinha Judge "'"v^