1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR C.A.W.No.117/2010 IN W.P.NO.1895/2009 Hiralal Vithobaji Deshpande -: versus :- Anand Gas Services C.A.W.No.115/2010 IN W.P.NO.1826/2009 Sudhir Dhanvijay -: versus :- Anand Gas Services C.A.W.No.114/2010 IN W.P.NO.1827/2009 Natthuji Gund -: versus :- Anand Gas Services C.A.W.No.116/2010 IN W.P.NO.2063/2009 Bandu K.Rangari -: versus :- Anand Gas Services C.A.W.No.113/2010 IN W.P.NO.2066/2009 Kewal B. Tirpude -: versus :- Anand Gas Services Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : MARCH 15, 2010. Petitioners/employee have filed these applications for directions to respondent to restore their work as full time employee [8 hours] and to pay them minimum wages accordingly. Respondent has filed reply contending that petitioners wee working on commission basis as per availability of work. Shri Kakani, learned counsel is striving to point out that in reference proceeding there was no specific stand in this respect and petitioners have deposed about their full time working hours and salary for that full time work. He points out that before Labour Court the employer undertook 2 to reinstate the employees and because of that undertaking in High Court the order of reinstatement has been passed. Shri Bhandarkar, learned counsel points out that in reference proceeding the labour Court has found order of termination to be legal and valid, that there is no finding about full time work load or payment therefor and the alleged pursis for providing work to petitioner was filed by the then counsel without any express instructions from the respondent. According to him as the reference is answered in negative, such an interim relief cannot be granted. After hearing the respective counsel I find that certain disputed question arise for determination in the matter, the same cannot be gone into conveniently in writ jurisdiction for the first time. Petitioners are at liberty to make their grievance before appropriate forum in appropriate jurisdiction and in accordance with the law so that the grievance and disputed questions can be resolved there. Hence subject to that liberty to the petitioners, the Civil Applications are disposed of. No cost. JUDGE Rgd.