HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (Q No. 6344 of2006 RESPONDENTS PETITIONERS : 1. Moolchand Sahu, S/o Shri Beniprasad Sahu, aged about 33 years, R/o village MohanA-i, Tehsil Mungeli District Bilaspur, Cfahattisgarh. 2. Tiunesh Kumar Hirwani S/o Shri Yashwant Lal Hirwani, aged about 20 years, R/o village Surdung (Bhilai), Tehsil [< Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS 1. Pt. Sundar Lal Sharma (Dpen) University Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Through the Vice Chancellor, Near Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Garden, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2. The Registrar, Pt. Sundar Lal Sharma (Open) University Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Near Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Garden, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Higher Education, DKS Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (CG). (WRIT PETITION U'NDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONS'nTU'nON OF WDIA) (SB: Hon'Me Mr. Satish K. AenUiotri, J.) Present : Shii Hemant Kesam'ani, Advocate for the petitioners. Smt. Indira Tripathi, Advocate forthe respondent No. 1 & 2. Shri Vivek Sharma, Panel Lawyer tbr the State/respondent No. 3. ORALORDER (Passed on 19 dayofNovemher, 20Q8) With fhe consent oftlie parties, the matter is taken up for hearing finally. 1. The petitionei-s impugn the letter dated 29.06.2006 (Aanexure P/3), whereby, the admission ofthe petitioners to B.Sc. (Bio) course was cancelied. 2. Leamed counsel appearmg for fhe petitioners submits that the petitioners have claimed admissionto B.Sc (Bio) course onthe basis ofMadhyama (Visharad) Certificate, obtained from Hindi Sahitya Sammelaii, Allahabad. ^ I Ylw^^ '^C^?Eiy Sahu Leamed counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 & 2 submits that the admission of petitioners to B.Sc. (Bio) course was rejected on the ground that no certificate was produced that the petitioners have obtained 10+2 course certificate in Biology. The petitioners have submitted certificate ofMadhyama (Visharad), which is equal to B.A. course, and the minimum qualification for admission to B.Sc. (Bio) course is 10+2 or equivalent qualification in Biology. Therefore, admission ofthe petitioners in B.Sc. (Bio) was cancelled for want ofrequisite qualification. I have heard leamed counsel appearing fbr the parties, perused the pleadings and documents appended thereto. 5. The petitioners have stated 12 Madhyama (Visharad) in Ifaeir applications. On perusal ofthe chart, with reeard to recognition ofdegrees conducted by various institute, Madhyama (Visharad) is equal to B.A. course. Therefore, applications of the petitioners are misleading and confasmg. Thus, the impugned letter dated 29.06.2006 (Amiexure P/3) is just, proper aiid needs no mterterence. 6. This petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to eosts. • SdA SatishK.Agnihotri Judge