IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 660 of 2008 (M/S) Saiyed Ahmad Son of Sri Nathu, Resident of village Imlikhera Dharampur, Pargana Bhagwanpur, Tehsil-Roorkee, District Haridwar. …… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand through Secretary Department of Revenue, Civil Secretariat, Dehradun and 2 others. … Respondents. Sri Pawan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri K.P. Upadhyay, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 to 3-State Date April 17, 2008. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard. This writ petition has been filed for issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to proceed with the consolidation operation upon the land in question of the petitioner according to map CH-5, which was distributed on 13-1-1989 in favour of the petitioner situated in Gata No. 415 village Imlikhera Dharampur Pargana Bhagwanpur, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. The contention of the petitioner is that the land is not being used for agricultural purpose and is Abadi on spot. The petitioner did not disclose in the writ petition whether he had filed objection under Section 9 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act before the Consolidation Officer or not. The only recourse was to file objection before the Consolidation Officer that the land in question may be kept out of 2 consolidation proceedings. In writ jurisdiction, no such order can be passed. In the circumstances of the case, the writ petition is devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed outright at the threshold. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. All pending applications stand disposed of. ( B.S.Verma, J. ) RCP 3 4