THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY C.R.P.No.3324 of 2011 30th September, 2011 Betwen :- Bandi Narasimha Reddy .. petitioner And Smt.Bandi Lakshmi Prasanthi @ Reddy Prasanthi .. Respondent THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY C.R.P.No.3324 of 2011 ORDER:- This revision has been directed against the order dated 2-8-2011 passed in FCOP No.11 of 2011 on the file of the Family Court, Kadapa, whereby and whereunder, the learned Judge of the Family Court directed the parties to produce certificate from the Psychologist. The petitioner and the respondent are husband and wife. They filed FCOP No.11 of 2011 under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act for divorce. They got married on 9-10-2008 at TTD Kalyana Mandapam, Kadapa according to the Hindu Rites and Customs. They lived together for 2 ½ months at Kodur and Banglore. Subsequently some differences arose between them and they lived separately. They presented the petitioner under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on 25-2-2011 seeking divorce by mutual consent. Para 4 of the petition presented by them before the Family Court needs to be noted and it is thus:- “Cause of action for the petition arose on 9-10-2008 at TTD Kalyana Mandapam, Kadapa, when the marriage of the petitioners was performed, also arose after two and half months of the marriage where the petitioners lived at Kodur and Banglore and thereupon when they began to live separately, and when the mediation for their reconciliation failed, when they have been living separately, from December, 2008, since the marriage of the petitioners was performed at TTD Kalyana Mandapam, at Kadapa, which is within the territorial jurisdiction of the Hon’ble Court.” The learned Judge of the Family Court on 2-8-2011 advised both the parties for reconciliation and directed them to produce Psychologist report on 13-2-2012. The said order is assailed in this revision. Notice before admission came to be ordered on 16-8-2011. Respondent entered appearance through a Counsel. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it is not the case of the petitioners that either of them is suffering from any psychological problems and in which case directing the parties to produce Psychologist report is unwarranted.. It is a case of incompatability between the parties and thereby they full apart and indeed they have been residing separately from December, 2008. In the given facts and circumstances, directing the parties to produce Certificate from the Psychologist is wholly unwarranted. In that view of the matter, the order passed by the learned Judge of the Family Court, Kadapa, directing the parties to produce Psychologist Report is hereby set aside. Both the parties are directed to appear before the learned Judge of the Family Court, Kadapa on 24-10-2011 to take further proceedings. As the minimum period prescribed of six months from the date of presentation of the petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act has been expired, the learned Judge of the Family Court, Kadapa, may consider the relief sought for by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. No order as to costs. ________________________ B.Seshasayana Reddy, J 30th September, 2011 Note:- Issue order copy within one week (B/o.smr)