IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE FRIDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2008 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 10731 of 2008(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ PRASANNA.K., 1071 A, SATELLITE TOWNSHIP KAKKANAD WEST P.O., KOCHI-30. BY ADV. SRI.V.G.ARUN SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THRIKKAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KAKKANAD, COCHIN 682030, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY (SPECIAL GRADE). 2. MALATHI PODUVAL, 1072A, SATELLITE TOWN SHIP, KAKKANAD WEST, KOCHI-30. BY ADV. SRI.LAL K.JOSEPH SRI.A.A.ZIYAD RAHMAN SMT.SHEENA SAMUEL SRI.V.R.REKESH SRI.SIBY MATHEW SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, J. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W.P.(C).No.10731/2008-C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 11th day of April, 2008 J U D G M E N T I do not propose to go into the merits of the grounds raised. But, obviously, Ext.P6 order revoking building permit, which had been granted to the petitioner, has been passed without notice to the writ petitioner. Under Rule 16 of the K.M.B.Rules it is obligatory that the powers should be invoked only with notice to the permit holder. 2. In the above circumstances, I direct the parties to consider Ext.P6 as a show cause notice and permit the petitioner to file objections to Ext.P6 within ten days from today. If the petitioner files objections within the time limit, the Secretary will issue notice to the petitioner, the second respondent and the third respondent, hear all of them and take a decision as to whether the permit is liable to be cancelled. Fresh decision as directed above shall be taken at the earliest and at any rate, within three weeks of the petitioner filing objections. The writ petition is dispose of as above. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, Judge ms