RIGH €OURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAsPUR W‘ P45! No, 3491 of 2008 SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salish K. Agnihofri, J Sin-i Pnwnn Kesharwani, Advocate for me pemioner. Shri Yashwnm Smgh Thakur, Depu‘ly Advocate General for ihe raponden'l's. L GRAL ORDER (Passed m this 7*“ Day of July, 2mg) 1. With fhe cansen'f af learned cannsel appearing for fhe par‘iies, +he mum:- is heard finally. 2. Learned counsel nppzaring for 1he pei-ii'ioner submits: “thin-i fha pe+i+ioner was apphln‘iad as Assls+an+ Teacher. Vida ordzr do'led 23.2.1995, an probn‘h'an for a periad of 'l'hrez years, on fixed pay cf Rs. 500/vpm. Affzr comple'l‘lan of pmbal'ian period, fhe pe'fifionar was gran'l'zd regular pay scale. He further submits fhn‘r ‘l'he Seqie invalved in fhe case is as-l'u whel'her +he pefi+iener is en'H'Hed fa regular pay scale wef. +he dn'l'e cf ini‘l’lal appainimen'l or nffer comple'l'lon cf proba'l'inn x\. ' d. i i Pe‘h‘fianer Saheh La! Nayak 5/a Baddu Ram kbyak, about ‘36 years, Werking as - Assisfam Teacher, 6mm Junior Primary Tadapum, Black - Pifhom, Disi'ritf- Mahasamund (C.6.) Qaspandenfs 1. Sfafe of Chha‘rl’isgurh, Through - l D.K.S. Secretary, School Education bepurmenf, 2. The Bhnwun, Raipu'r, bls‘rm Raipur (6.6.). Disfricf Educn'finn Officer, Mahnsamund, bisrh: Mah asamund- (CE). 3. Thz Dimcfnr 4. Public Insl'mcfion, Rnipur {CI&) The Block Educa'rior: Officer, Pifhom, Disn: The issue involved, herein was considzrcd by 1412 Madhya Pmdesh 51'a‘l‘2 AdminiS'l'm‘rive Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. Na. 2745/89 (Madhuknn‘r Vadu and 56 o+hers Vs‘ 5+a+e of MP. & o'fhars), wherein if was hzid 'i'ha‘i' 'I’hz simiiariy sifuafed hackers are enfH'ied +n regular pay emie wef. 'rhe da-I'e af inifiai appoin‘fment The mn'H'er was faken‘up 'ka 1h: Hon'ble 5upreme Court The appeal was dismiesed by the Hon‘ble Supreme Cour+ upholding 'H1e decisinn of +he Tribunal +0 fhe effect fha‘r fhe Teachers/Assisnmf Teachers are arm-fled +0 regular pay scale from 'i'he da‘I'e of ini‘l’ial appoin‘l'menf. 4. In view af ‘Hae above sfafe submissions made by learned couri$l for fhe par-lies, 'H'ie wrif pe'ti'I-ion is disposed of in ‘rhe some +erms i.e., fhe pe'ii'l’ioner is gran‘i'ed liber‘l‘y +o make a represen‘fa‘i'ion, if so advised, 1'0 consider his case' if he stands on flue some foo'lings, as per ‘the order dafed 24.8.1992 passed by fhe Mndhya Pmdesl'i Smfe Adminisi‘ro'i'ive Tribunal; Jabalpur, in O.A.No. 2745 of 89 (Madhukon'l' Yodu) (supra) and suhsequen'l'ly confirmed by 'l'he order da'i'ed 3.1.1.994 passed by fhe Hon‘ble Supreme Couri’ in Special l enve Pe‘l'ifion (Civil) No. 6892/93 and gran‘i' relief accordingly 5. In View of 'l‘he foregoing, fhe petition is disposed of. No order asfo ccS'i’S. sw- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur ijfvj’nr, .