m TIARH UR THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATSG AT BILASP \ () a W § /20 0 . PnNO. §0 ] $ awr Prasad Arawa S/o f5 D13tnct agatram Agrawal Age ut 0 years R/o Amblkau oad, ‘ attagao asliipur, (C.G i ER-SUS 21. ‘PEN‘ e tate ofCG Throuh rh ecretary of Deartment f orgst D.K.S. Bhawan, RalpLI ! vion iisi " D ( ) istrlct Ralgarh C G .Sb Forest u D1V1swnal Officer Sb d jgh u 1V1s1on Dharamalar istrict Raigarh (C G g p o F } (CG) f a1ama1 L/Mah gl J d \ab 5 pr _ R , Pln, J .) _ - IV s :SONDTR Th S g c Diisal Dvon Forest Of CL Dhjgar D ) °' GH COURT OF CHHATTIbGR ’ LASPU ‘I AH BJR RIT PETITION (C) NO 5080 OF 2010‘ - PFTITIONER ‘ MahaVIr Prasad Agrawal Versus ‘ ESPONDENTS i ‘ The State of C G & 0thér‘s3- ‘ gHmn under Article 226/227 of the (‘onctitutlon of India) ‘ R ; ‘P (W' ' ngle Bench Hon ble’Shn SatISh K Agmhotrl J S s Renu Kochar Advocate for the petition hrl P K Bhadurl Panel Lawyer :e te Sta 010 2). V irection to the espondents to release the vehlcle (Bolero Pick up) beanng OA1822549 (for shmt “the men ng vehu‘le: ) an s'Tth’at‘ m ’pemio‘ner isth ‘ g w; ‘- vo nzf‘ ' ‘ r rélea e "f the offendmg vehl e o V“ “x\ M er .‘ S ‘or d ’ - . r v"m ‘ ' ., _ I N d _ . ..... ‘ i e . ‘j i ms Court m Cr-M’P" /No~:609 $2009 (De } dhari IPra$ad"Gu.pt t a_ co ‘oa‘ded ih veicl I reistration No CG 14 ZC 0258 which is seized m g g a fs h ffd vehicle The same dret offence was loaded In te oenm c as ut the authorltles Without appreCIaing t said exlanio offendin vehicle Ms Koch rfurther submitsa he offending vehicle was not seized i hereafter the petitioner filed an application under ectio te Code of Criminal Procedure before Court o icil\iM‘aistrat?F-irtrCass, aigar-, ic a ected‘by order dated 19/0/0, roun orac jdidtlnrTgt h io a titn rsicohereaain's-, te petti preferred peio bg f 2010 W n w lib y tte nder he to avail statutor remedy available to the peiionr u t lawt w of the said order the petitioner ile an a bfe iViinal Forest Oficer rease of‘t‘he'offending veicle o DSo f for el h n sdna tg‘ up§urma The Competent Authority Without appreCiain of e it th case in its letter and spir rejected the application of the peiioner in i v, arlitrary manner. supportofh : f Hgh Cr ahya Sa o lirtPf sand V S ) h s i tate of Chhattusgarh & Others te eann ‘ x l a p vehicle lso exlained by the driver of he offending b t he patn g tht ft ea n a ores ar. T Sn 57 of h eth f l ' seized the “t l ein W P (C) No 2125 o t y /2010 his Court b order dated 06/05 I: ‘W p of by a‘s disosed i ithdraw ith erty ln Vie fd pplication {eor th p Dty e Cometent Authority cum epu i i t d ts herfacts an Circumsance legal an tt an i plaiced reliance upon they decisionro i out ofrMd ‘;adesh e /7 tte f f- \ VPr ‘rendered in Dvi Sing i ‘ () % N 3i l : , 2009 1i i\JPIR S al l he i b fat w Judagesl' Dha 'h Whh Ws ‘ réj 4201 o e gd ik or l i 3 l d gi ln er y Its‘ thé’tfth‘'offending yehic,|’eis?liki|y t_ i 1 ‘ é ’é o;be deteriorated, f i f h pts have heard learned counsel appearmq or te arie p thto. he f Competent Authonty~cum Deputy visi fficer by order dated 14/06/2010 observec at the eitione i s the habituai offender and Invoived in various ores oences ' i a f h e nd by recording all the facts and Circumstances o te cas 1 f, l f ‘ rejected the application of the petitioner for reease o fending vehicle on supurdnama Thel i r reasoned order which does not warrantlinterference of thi erusied the pleadings and the documents appended ere r r Foest r O th ptr i : i ft ff r t/Tbl modified by the superior Courriuna l ore dated 14/06/2010 assed by the Competent Authority— 'd p ut DiViSional Forest Ocer is no uner chaenge i » t The oer hs bec fi et his etition rd a ome nal till it is either s On this ‘c ismissed oun also the petition deserves to be d n the result the w t petition being beret o meri is liable t ‘l f f t o; e ise t sw— i I Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i T Dional ;f mpugned oder is: :a s ; i epy ffi t d ll n ”ag tlf