"^? p'" i€^ .^.. \^-^ ......°"^' ^^.^s.^\ L?^"a:'^y^'^ .....••••^^••^^-"-- v^^!^ 4 ^y 'A^6'.A..-" IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No.^Q^/2005 Petitioner Respondents ^> M^^ / R.R.Pekra, S/o Boya Ram, Aged about 40 years, R/o Ward No.17, Masjid Mohalla, Forest Colony, Manendragarh, District - Koria (CG) Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh - Through the Secretary, Forest Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2) The Special Secretary, Forest Department, State of Chhattisgarh, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA y XI-HC-78 TFT^T^TT^ ^•pq •^qiqicXI, tP-ai1<1<ICo, RlrtWy< L^-^^r ^[^2- oo 3TT^?T^TR^ ^Taffan^ST^lTO 31T^?T q^l? (^c|i^6|<^) ^200 g^RVT^R ^rf^T 3TT^5T 29.11.2005 Shri P. Diwakar, Se Shakeel, counsel for the petil Shri Paakaj Shrivaj respondents/ State. Leaaied counsel for petitioner, who is workuig a^ cpi<ifo<n^ +ii<ic)T^'I^^ ^Ri^;i<< ^3Tf^T3n^5T bior Advocate with Shri Kasif ^oner. f tava, Paael lawyer for fbie Forest Division, Maaendra|garh, Distt.- Korea has beeu traasferred to Raage Of&^er, Kudai'garh, Soufh. Sm'guja Forest Division. The petitioner has filed fhis petition chatlenguig the inipugned tr^ flie ground fhat fhe unpugn^ during the baii period as p^r traasfer policy clated 25.5.2005 aud 7.6.2005. The traa^ traasfers of the einployees, trausfer order has been pass] order dated 17.11.2005 wa; froni one place to other pl^ transfer order/ it appears ftj the petitioner subinits titiat the Raage Officer at Maiiendragarh, kasfer order dated 17.11.2005 on :d taraiisfer order has been passed fer poUcy provides for ban ia except in those cases where fhe ed ni co-ordiaation wifh fhe Chief Mmister m admmistrative ejxigency. The impugned traasfer > passed, taraDLsferrixig 49 officers .ce. On perusal of the impugned iat ftie order has been passed in XI-HC-78 TR^T^TT^ vsT^i ^qiqic»«,^d^ns, tomg^ tv-tP-^o' S'^^'2- 3Tr^?Tq?T^icb ^TT 3TR5TjRFlfl^ -A<1L 3IT^?T q^cp (^c|i^<s|<^) ^200 ^ ?^TT^;Hl^T3TT^^T —2_ co-ordmation wifh. the Chief ^ <-bl^Ic6<n^^i+ic)T:^fe^?| <<Rl^|<< ^^rf^rw^^T tlinister, as a copy offhe traasfer order has been endorsed to |the Office of the Chief Mmister. There is no ofher ground lipse malafide exercise of powers, itions, or uiconipetence of the violation of statutory re^ of&cer m passiag ftie impugn^d traasfer order. Learaed counsel for fh|e petitioner furftier submits fhat the impugned traiisfer order at Kudargarh, Soufh. Sui^u; traasfer order ia fhe case of ^aa nof be given effect to because |a Forest Division, one Shri R.K. Paadey is already posted an|l has been working. There is no ui co-ordiaation wifh fhe contention is conceraed, it | -\ 3hri R. K. Paadey. The contention oflearaed counsel challengijig fhe itnpugned traiisfer order is not sustamable, as it has bejen passed m acconlaace wifh law, Dhief Mmister. So far as latter Ls for fhe State Goveniraent to see that the impugned traasfer| order passed by the respondents are given effect to ioiinediat^ly. In view of the fore However, Uberty is graat< representation to fhe con<^ ^omg, fhe petition is dismissed. ^d to the petitioner to make a leraed auftiorities to consider his 33 case keepiag m view, e^ucation of the chUdren of fhe XI-HC-78 \5wi T<<iqic)<i, t?Ti1<<i<i<?, Rom^x t^<(P- ^je-r ^8^ 34 <TFIc5T^*n^ 3TT^?T q^P (lclij6l<£l) Wt200 ^ W^^TWRTlJcb ^TTW^^TSCTW ..^ 6c^ A^il ?^TT^;Hf^T3TT^9T r- 3^- petitioner for retaiamg at April, 2006 to facUitate com^ if so advised. No order as to Certified copy, as per I] tbe cpi<<Irt<i1Ti <ii*ioT^ffe<-cl ^f^it^i^ ^3T(^T311^5T present place of postmg, till letion of his children's education, 'osts. iules. Sd/- SadshK.Agnihotri Judge ^ ^ €7