Stnc'P Rr'n'ch ^^ S.B. (Service Matter) IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH1 WRrr PETITION(S) N0.5^725" /2011. PETITIONERS: \ .^// ~\vivW , M~ Al <l7/C^ /\' -^' <^~ ; •^- <5. ,<c\ ^^ Respondents ^ 1. Nainsukh Kispotta, son of Shri Lachhu Kispotta, aged about 44 years, residence of village Koma, Post Kastura, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Remish Ekka, son of Shri Sthefan Ekka, aged about 42 years, residence of viUage Jhamjharia, Post Bangurkela, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Ramdhani Sai, son of Shri Doman Sai, aged about 35 years, residence of village Koma, Post Bangurkela, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Anandiyus Tirkey, son of Shri Alvish Tirkey, aged about 39 years, residence of village Vipatpur, Post Bangurkela, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. S.Niman Jyoti Khessh, son of Shri Anand Kuxnar Khessh, aged about 29 years, residence of village Vipatpur, Post Bangurkela, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. :•]'. ^-;iS?S^b£S&^i5>3^-y'351ii-.fS^^^y^fcBiesy;^Sii=^ S^' .w1s-^i^ JrH;Hr € 2- ^ 3. Director, Public Instructions, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhatdsgarh. 5. Assistant Comraissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 6. Collector, Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. /7. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Vipatpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITIQNUNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOFLINDIA WSSiS :i^:^ts^ll HLGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR (Hon. IVIr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) W.P.(S)No. 5725 of 2011 Petitioner Nainsukh Kispotta and others VERSUS Res@ondents State of Chhattisgarh and others Present: Rao, counsel ?" ?a Shri CJK. petitioners. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. A.G for the State. for the O RD E R (26.09.2011) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner and similarly placed persons is under consideration with the State Government and this fact is evident from theletter dated 29.01.2008 (Annexure P-5) and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition, at this stage with llberty to file fresh representation and to pursue the same. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection if the petitioner withdraws this petition. 3. Petltioner is granted permission to withdrawthis petition with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn^. '^^^cs ^^^ Pnva