^ HtGHCOURT^FCHMATTISGARHArSIEftSRI.lff WritPet!ti6h(cSN0.2S[)061;2007 "ift Petitioner Versus ResDondents Mohammad Safiqe S/o. l.at&Phw> KRalifa,agedab6ut62years,Rto. Wterd No. 11, Villagefc-fePest^ffice Ramanujganj, Distt.Surguja ff?.G.) :1. TheStateofChtlatlisgarlT, Through: Secretary, UrbanAdministrabonand DeVelopmentDeRartraent.D.K.S. Bhawan.Raipur (C.GJ 2. ChjefMun!cipalOfficer,Nagar Panctayat, Ramanujganj, Distt. Surguja<G.Gj 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Ramanujganj, Distt.Surguja(C.G.) 4. Tahsildar.Ramanujganj.Distt.Surguja (C.G.) 5. Nazpol Aclhilari, Ramanujgan}; Surguja(C.Gj WRn'PETITIONUNDERARTICLE 226^227 OF THE 03NSTITUTION OF . ' : INDIA SB : Hon'bleJusticeShriSatishK.Aanihotri Present:Mr.SanjayPatel,counsefforthepetitioner. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel lawyer forthe respondents No. 1,3, 4 and5/State. ORDER : / :: ;., ; 1 \ ^ (Passedonthis 2^hday ofApril, 2007) 1. Leamed counse^ appeanng for the peUtioner does not want^o press ottier points, except that the ©hiefMunlcipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Ramanujganj, District Surguja be directed to consider and (teGjde his representationdated 7^4.2007 ^nnffiaifeP/S^befoFepa^ingtheorder ofdemolitioh; ,\ 2. This prayer is justand proper. Thus, in the interest ofjustice, this petition is disposed of wtth the direetion to the Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Ramanujganj, DistrictSurguja/respondent No. 2 to consider his pending representation (supra), in accordance with law, expedltiously, as early as possible. No steps to demolish the property in dispute be taken, till the final disposal of thesaid representation. Sd/- \ SatisliK.Agnihotri Judge e -o :\ 'is; f