•^- ^ BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTCS^RH AT BILASPUR rcHHAmsGARH) Ojvision BencB Review Petition 6glNo. 3^ of 2011 fb.B.') RETITIONER c j^w^. ^^^ sw-"-^'"^.,,-"-" •'• .^»°^'l ^'" RESPONbENTS VERSUS 1. 2. 3. The New India Insurance Company Limited, through Divisional Manager, bivisional Manager, Divisional Office, Bhilai, Parakh Bhawan, Station Road, Durg (Issued Office) District Durg (C.G.) Radhelat S/o Latkhor Ram Sahu, aged about 45 years, Smt. Shailendri Bai, W/o Radhelal Sahu, aged about 40 years, Both are R/o Village Kusumkasa, Tahsil Balod. District Durg (C.G.) Girwar Singh S/o Sundarlal, aged about 27 years, resident of village Kusumkasa. Tahsil Balod, bistrict burg (C.G.) ^ ^; REVIEW PETITEON UNbER SECTION 114 OF C.P.C. ^ ^^f ^T R^Jcb wrr^it^T^qN' ^ST ^iqi(rt<4, y>-a1^^<o, [®!dt<U^< -_..^.P....Ho.:...3S'J.M!/. 'm^?r^5iN?"''^v^""''^":"^J-/"t::::-'"""<^2oo ^II^T ^S^K ( ^sli^^f) ^T R^F?T3^ DIVISION BENCH HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEVGUP1 & HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH 29.04.2011 Shri Raj Awasthi, learned Shri Dharmesh Shriva respondents No. 1 and 2. Learned counsel for th^ parties are heard on I.A. No.01/2011, an application for| filing the review petition. On due consideration, petitioner/ Insurance Compan^ sufficient cause forthe delay in IA No.01/2011, thereforel filing the review petition is herebjy condoned. Learned counsel for the FJarties are heardon the review petition. The petitioner/ Insurance] the order dated 07.12.2010, pa^! The sole ground pressedj Insurance Company for seekir|ig review of the order dated 07.12.2010 is that though tl^e Insurance Company was exonerated by the Tribunal ^010—1,00,000. ^H?<!1<ill 'HR^ ^T fe^ iRn'^K ^3?fWW^T A, C.J., CHANDRAKAR. J. ^ounsel for the petitioner. tava, learned counsel for condonation of the delay in we are satisfied that the has succeeded in showing ling the review petition. is allowed and the delay in |Company is seeking review of IsedinMANo. 150/2005. into service by the petitioner/ ^ide impugned award dated '.-cy^' fA^ . i K.3^ ^^v^s^- ^l^F ^T R$HIJ<^ 'WT ^i^T sh^S^ nimmj \r W^W %»3|8?$ '7^ ^I^Krl^, ^xll-f-I^Ko, f®l<ni<-)^<' ......&^.|?.....3.t(/.zou........... @ •^200 -2-- ^^!^^K (^3®^) ^CTW^^I^I^T 06.11.2004, in the order passe o?is^m<fl<i 1ro^ff ^ ft^t <n»i^i< '^3TRP?^TS^F B in the appeal the Insurance Company was directed to depf)sit the enhanced amount of compensation along with interesjt. On due consideration, th^ the order dated 07.12.2010 pa^sed in M.A. No. 150/2005 is hereby recalled and M.A. No.| original number for rehearing on| review petition is allowed and t 150/2005 is restored to its merits. Post M.A. No. 150/2005 Jfor rehearing in the month of July,2011. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge 5TRI^r ^^ g^TT^T, .^-rhFIk —FS/T47—2/201 O —1,00,000<