^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIIASRJRj'C.G.) C. R. No. W /2003 PETITIONERS: /CLAIMANTS € sP/ 9Y.4' ^ ./yy ^/ <^/ RESTONOENTS NON-APPLICANTS y" / ^l) Smt. Sagabai KhanddwaS W/o. Samariiram Khandehvat, Aged aboufc 35 year. / 2) Sant<^h Kumar S/o. SaffBruram KhandeSwa! Aged about 14 Year. 3) Ku. Shanti bai D/o. Saniariiram Khasidetwa! Aged atout 11 -year. 4) Harishchsndra S/o. SatTiamram Khanddv^ai Aged about 8 year 5) Ku. Kanti D/o. Samaruram Khanddwai A»3edabout 5 year 6) Janakram S,/o. Satnamram Khandelwaf ^ed atout 3 year 7) Vlshal Kumar S/o. Samaruram Khanddwal Aged aboufc 1 ^esr, petitioners No. 2 to 7 are RepresentBJ by tegat guardlan rne^her Sagabal VERSL6 1) Rajjak Bhal S/o. Serubhai Mudia R/o. Raipur-Gujrat Rosd Unes, Tatibandh Ralpur 2) Ahmad Bhai Juma Bliai Sawanj R/o. Rajpur Gujrat Road Unos: Tattbandh, Ralpw 3) The Mew Ind?a Insurance Co. Ltd. Kutchhferi Chowk, Jaii Road, Raipur (C.G.) Clvsl ReYlsion Under Section 115 of the Co(fe of Cs'vil Pr-ocedure *sp«iww*n^» T^T ';:^rai^R, ^ftwrs, *[®joij^^< . ^.R, ^o. ^^1 ^...^........;.».......-:...........,r....;.^..^200^ ^T^?^^K (^i^<^?) 3^1'^T^rr^ wff^fli^'^iN' Kvr ^aw?^N%!^r Shri Shri Aditya Khare, counsel N Learned counseS wlth the passage.oftlme thls revisll Accord!ng!y, the revjsion i^ jnfructuous. No order asto ^FTqta'^^Tq^f T|* fe^ ^N^R ^T ^tRfH 3T!^T SJ|)H >r the appjlcants. for the that has become infructuous. as has Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge