IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10545 of 2009 SATISH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 9.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner is one of the accused who have been alleged to have fired at the deceased killing him which led to institution of the case known as Mufassil P.S. Case no. 251 of 2004 under sections 364, 302, 307 and other substantive offence of the Indian penal Code. From the record it appears that the petitioner has been evading law and after much efforts of the police petitioner has finally been able to be remanded in this case. From perusal of the order passed by the court of Additional Sessions Judge, FTC IV, Munger it has come that the trial of this petitioner has been delayed because he has been an absconder and it is fact that the trial is going on and three witnesses have already been examined. Learned counsel for the informant also informs the Court that there are many serious cases pending against the petitioner and if the petitioner is enlarged on bail he again shall abscond and will jeopardize the trial of the case. All other accused of this case have been tried separately and appropriate orders have come to be passed in their cases including conviction. Taking the entirety of the allegations, submissions made at the bar on behalf of the informant and the impugned - 2 - order, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioner’s trial should be expedited. In the above circumstances he does not deserve bail in the matter. The prayer for bail is rejected. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)