IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24999 of 2011 Ramsurat Paswan, son of late Ramrup Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3. 22.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that some incriminating articles were recovered from the house of the petitioner after the dacoity, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, since the recovery is made almost after three months of the occurrence, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge if his case is not bifurcated. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)