IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2010 / 17TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 17595 of 2010(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- VIJAYALAKSHMI SUSHIL, MARATT HOUSE, KOORKKANCHERRY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR SMT.N.N.PRASEEDA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE KERALA STATE FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHALACHITHRA KALA BHAVAN, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR FOR R1 SRI.A.ABDUL KHARIM FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PETITIONER'S EXTS: EXT.P1:- COPY OF AGREEMENT DTD.8.2.2001 EXECUTED BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENT EXT.P2:- COPY OF LETTER DTD.16.2.2001 ISSUED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR OF RESPONDENT CORPORATION EXT.P3:- COPY OF NOC ISSUED BY HUDCO DTD.2.9.2002. EXT.P4:- COPY OF LETTER DTD.29.9.2009 ISSUED BY HUDCO TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P5:- COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD.17.12.2008 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. EXT.P6:- COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD.15.9.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXTS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.17595 OF 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of July, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner purchased two shop rooms in a commercial complex built by the first respondent Kerala State Film Development Corporation at Thrissur. Although the petitioner paid full purchase price, sale deeds have not yet been executed in favour of the petitioner in respect of shop rooms. It is under the above circumstances the petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs: “(i) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondent Corporation to execute the sale deeds in respect of the shop rooms covered by Exhibits P1 and P2 in favour of the petitioner or her nominee without any delay”. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the delay is only procedural and the respondent would require some more time to complete the procedure. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondent to execute the sale deeds in favour W.P.(c)No.17595/10 2 of the petitioner in respect of the two shop rooms purchased by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd W.P.(c)No.17595/10 3