w K3 £4 £2 £k 0 3‘ 0 ‘ 0 J t_ . o t p i m •; KD c £2 0 p 0 C tic 1 £7 * p, c £1 0 ‘0 P p £4 KD C p ‘I ‘0 C ) (1 ‘1 Kf F K U . S C’ IS c IC I IS r C C k. Cs C C £7 11 I tIC’ % CS ci C a Li ti ‘i C fr :L I,- I ; , IL 4 o C I C I- 1’ S £7 U x CE E (5) , p 2 r 3, Kurn. S ,Vanitha, aged asout IU years, D/o late Shiv 0 , 1. despondent No.2 & 3 are minors, repnsented by ndir mother auG guarai Smt. Kanyakunari 1st respondent. 4. Stat. Jaa-ki Bai, agea. about o years, 14/o iace Shiv. 5 1ngh, represtnted oy A Holder Sri. J.Gopal ingh, All are resiaing at No.i, Heaoalgudd 55 lli, L 1 ,L iag,ar,San 6 alore56GO3G, 5, Sri .Mariyappa, 3/0 Tppanna, major, Driver vehicle io,AXA-6187, residentof onnappanaa1li, zettalair post, Dvenahalli taluk, Bangal’n istrict, 6. .h.Pitambaraswamy, major, resident of Sonnavpanabli, 3etalsoor post, beflahall taluk, Hangaicre uist, . . . 3 ae 7. The New india Maurance company, i4To,47, 2nd floor, zaar street, Ye shwanthapura, Bangalore-22, Representeo. by its Manager. . ..Bespondents, (By Sri.S,Chamarsja tie dy .AaV,, for Içspts,) sri. .Muniswamappa, +/o late Sri, krappa, major, Resicing at, Sonnappanahalli, Bangalore Norti T Bangqjore s)istrict. , .Appellant. (By 5i, St.i.3adashjvappa, 411v,, for Appit.) a 1, i. ,Nar yona &iagk’ Fh€r’s name not anown to the Petitioner, &ajor, Residing near Nagnatheswara iemple atreet, Chintamani fown, Kgiar District. ,., 4 04-p 2. kariyeppa, J/o Thiça na of Vhzcle No.AXL-7J2? r/o SomappanahaiJi, a.ttaggsoor nost, Devrwhaili tat, Banglon Dist. 3. a.K.Pitb,,raswaay, flajor, rIo i,onnapp.,.,haui, Bettalasoor post, DgvenahaUi tap,Jc, Bqgnlofl District. 4. the New Itnia assurance Co., No.47, n floor, ôoLat Street, Yesbanthapura, ôUtty0 -fl. (* 0 spondsnts 2 to 4 us the judd in the trial Court.). ... ftespon*ate. 3y an. haaarstJa £,‘Ay fray. for Respts.) as. 0W -0’ e5s - Regular First kppeais against the •/ Judgment a deane passed by the LA.t. ib Jo. I Bañgalore City in %Jo. 1147 & U4f85 on his file dated 23jeleB9. This appeal acting on for hearingihis day, the court delivered the fcllovings I UDG3 IT The Appellant under his signature along with the signature of his j4veoate filed a memo for being permitted to idthdrw the appeg as ording to the appellant, the matter between the c1aia,ts and the Jndgant S debtcr has been settled aud the award has been satisfied and as such, the appeal does not survive for consideration. In view of this statement of the appellant oont$ned in the mao, the two appeals i.e. appeal Jo. 36W 1989 mid .. .6 ‘I 6- p 1 NC o6d/19 are hereby dis used as hving bee witt r yr. Jt( C A Righ( BanaJoze-.ooo ogi