1 mgj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Notice of Motion No.210 of 2007 with Chamber Summons No. 951 of 2009 in Suit No.105 of 1992 Dhirendra Singh Gohel ..Plaintiff vs. Sonia Shivendrasingh Gohel & ors. ..Defendnats Ms.Trupti Daphtary i/b Hariani and Co. for plaintiff Ms.U.M.Jhaveri with Mr.Mahendra Rathod for defendant no.1 CORAM: K.K.TATED J 9th July,2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the parties. 2 The present chamber summons no.951 of 2009 is preferred by the original plaintiff for deleting the names of defendant nos. 4 and 6 who expired on 12th June, 2007 2 and 1st December, 2008 respectively. The learned Counsel appearing for defendant no.1 has no objection to allow the chamber summons. In paragraph 4 of the affidavit in support to the chamber summons the plaintiffs have stated that the Advocate for defendant nos. 1 and 2 by his letter dated 11th February 2009 informed them the dates of demise of defendant nos. 4 and 6 and, therefore, there is a delay in preferring the present chamber summons. 3 Considering the averments made in the affidavit in support of the chamber summons, chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c) which read as under. (a) That the name of the deceased Defendant no.4 and 6 be deleted from the title of the present suit no.105 of 1992; (b) that the plaintiffs be permitted to carry out such consequential changes/amendments in the plaint and proceedings as per the Schedule I hereto annexed; (c) That the plaintiff be permitted 3 to carry out consequential amendments in the title of Notice of Motion No. 210 of 2007 4 Chamber Summons is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. 5 Notice of Motion no.210 pf 2007 is adjourned by four weeks. (K.K.TATED J.)