IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10912 of 2008 MITHILESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 27/08/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. A boy was kidnapped. Amount of ransom of rupees twenty lacs was not paid then he was killed by unknown criminals. Initially the case was registered under section 364 of the Indian Penal Code and later on section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added. Submission is that the petitioner has not been connected with the offence during entire investigation. His name has come on the basis of confessional statement of Chotelal Yadav who was earlier named by Shamsher Alam. The mobile which was used for ransom belong to Harendar Pratap Yadav and not of the petitioner. Further submission is that Chhotelal Yadav has been granted bail by this court on 19.5.2008 in Cr. Misc. No. 17670 of 2008 and Harendar Yadav has also been admitted to bail vide order dated 6.2.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4118 of 2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Mithilesh Kumar is directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Ashok Raj, J. M. Ist Class, East Champran at Motihari in connection with Muffasil (Motihari) P.S. Case No. 203 of 2006. avin. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)