IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14885 of 2006 Smt.Kamini Sharma W/O Late Prof. Basudeo Sharma, resident of Mohalla- Ghhakar Maidan Road, P.S. Kaji Mohammadpur, District- Muzaffarpur ---------------------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Secretary-cum- Commissioner, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. The Director, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Vice-Chancellor, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur 4. The Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur 5. The Finance Officer, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur --------------------- Respondents. ----------- 12 03-05-2011 Heard Sri Prabhu Nath Rai, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Iqbal Asif Neyazi, learned A.C. to Govt. Pleader No.4 and Sri Rajendra Kumar Giri, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent nos.3 to 5/ B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. The present writ petition was filed with a prayer to direct the Respondents to make payment of arrear of pension of the husband of the petitioner, for fixation of family pension and arrear of difference of family pension. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that for the relief sought for in the present writ petition, the petitioner had filed representation before the competent authority. However, till date no decision has been taken. The writ petition was filed in the year 2006. It was jointly submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file afresh detailed representation before the Respondent no.3/ B.R.A. Bihar 2 University, Muzaffarpur. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Respondent no.3/ Vice-Chancellor, B.R.A.Bihar University, Muzaffarpur within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, Respondent no.3 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If Respondent no.3 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is also required to pass order for clearing the dues of the petitioner within the aforesaid time. In case of refusal, Respondent no.3 is required to pass speaking order within three months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)