• VSs Bsa ^ ^^1 A 5 1»•: iti!"a,sft cp r<^,9_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. <>N Of2007 PEZITIONER ^SMT. SANTOSH DUBEY , aged •/^r° about 49 yearsW/o ShriAnup ^'^p' Kumar Dubey, Assistant Grade - 2, ^'"^P ..•• ^/° Jolnt Director , Veterinar ;^i ^ c' /-<_-—*.- ^- . -t 1 T^ • . ^, ^y- /^:^' /y^ -'' z/ Veterinaiy Services , Jagdalpur District Bastar (CG). VERSUS RESPO_NDENTS : l.The ^ through fj- ^ ^ y^ ^ ^0' <^ ^'f\<-° ^ f^iy.—.^i/ft^ yAy _ ...„., .'"'(^ PW &PARyA Y^- State of Chhattisgarh, the Secretaiy, Departraent ofVeterinary Senrices , Mantralay - D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipiir (CG). '2. Director , Directorate ofVeterinary Services , Near Guru Tej Bahadur Park, G.E. Road, Raipur (CGj. 3. Joint Director, Veterinary Services, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG). 4. Collector, Bastar District at Jagdalpur (CG). 5. Treasury Officer, District Treasury, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG).. / • WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA /' r. ytfa.s9»eaiti».^s».»»!».i^ysi-..H^^ i\ HI6H COURT OF CHHATraS6ARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 775 of 2007 Petitioner Smt. Santosh Dubey Versus Respondents The State of ChhattisgcB-h & others Single Bench; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Present; Mr. S. K. Thomas, Advocats for the oetitioner. Mr. Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State/respondents. ORD ER (Passed on 8th Day of February, 2007) The followin9 order of the Court was passed by Satish K. ^nihotri, J. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Lower Division Clerk (Assistant Srade-III) on ad hoc basis by order dated 16.5.84 (P/l) by the Principal, Veterincry Field Assistant Trainina Centre, Ja9dalpur. The petitioner continued as ad hoc Lower Division Clerk (Assistcmt Srade-III) till he was re9ul<ir'ized in service on 18.1.88 (P/2). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to grant of annual increments in view of Circular No. C/3-5/93/3/0ne dated 12.5.1993 (P/4) issued bv the Sovernment of Madhya Pradesh. Seneral Administrative Department. In view of the said circuiar, the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to make a representation before the concemed authorities for grant of annual increments, to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State has no objection. 3. In the event a representation is made, the respondents authorities moy consider the same, in accordance u»ith lcm, on its own merit, within a period of eight weeks from the receiDt of reDresentation, if any. 4. The petition stands accordin9ly disposed of with the above stated liberty. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per rules. ^- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ^v^ 'w^ ^i ' ~