IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-5709 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 01.11.2010 Ali Mohammad and another ..Petitioners versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. V.K. Bali, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikas Malik, A.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Ajay Singla, Advocate for Mr. Kul Bhushan Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral) At the very outset, learned State Counsel has submitted that since the charges have already been framed in this case by the trial Court, so, the present petition for quashing the FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in Minakshi Bala v. Sudhir Sharma 1994(3) RCR Criminal 123. 2. Faced with the situation, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioner to raise all the points involved in the instant petition at the time of challenging the order of framing charge before the Sessions Judge along with application of condonation of delay or at any subsequent stage in the trial Court. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Mehinder Singh Sullar) November 01, 2010 Judge naresh.k