1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.08.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.JYOTHIMANI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.(MD).No.8710 of 2011 Jeyaraj : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Principal Secretary cum Land Administrative Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District. 3.The President, Thadikarankonam, Kanyakumari District. 4.The Block Development Officer, Boothapandi, Thovalai Taluk, Kanyakumari District. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 06.07.2011 and consequently to direct the second respondent to implement the direction given by the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.l;o2/30365/2009, dated 03.02.2011. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Nandakumar For Respondents : Mr.K.Mahendran Special Government Pleader O R D E R [Order of the Court was made BY P.JYOTHIMANI, J] Mr.K.Mahendran, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. In respect of the grant of gift of 20 cents of lands in Thadikarankonam Panchayat by one Mr.Padmanabapillai for the purpose of laying road, it appears that steps have not been taken as it is seen in the communication dated 03.02.2011 issued by the first respondent directing the second respondent - District Collector to look into the matter and remove the encroachment. The grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of the order passed by the first respondent, the second respondent has not taken any action, and the Writ Petition is for a direction against the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 06.07.2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. Considering the above said facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that pursuant to the gift said to have been given, further action has been taken as per the communication of the first respondent, we are of the view that the second respondent must act as per the communication of the first respondent dated 03.02.2011. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of with a direction against the second respondent to act as per the direction issued by the first respondent dated 03.02.2011 and file a report to the first respondent within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(C.S) To 1.The Principal Secretary cum Land Administrative Commissioner, Chepauk, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District. 3.The President, Thadikarankonam, Kanyakumari District. 4.The Block Development Officer, Boothapandi, Thovalai Taluk, Kanyakumari District. +1. CC to the Special Government Pleader, SR.No. 26398 NB ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD).No.8710 of 2011 04.08.2011 TR : 07.09.2011: 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/