IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 1947 of 1990 Date of Decision : 30.11.2010 Krishan Kumar & others .......... Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana & others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present : None for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Dalal, Advocate for respondent No.3 **** RITU BAHRI, J. (ORAL) The petitioners had prayed for regularisation of their services. Mr. S.S. Dalal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.3 has made a statement that the services of the petitioners have been regularised by the bank. The learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the factual position. Nothing survives in the writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. 30.11.2010 (RITU BAHRI) 'sp' JUDGE