IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO: 7715 of 2005 Between: K.Obulappa, S/o.Venkatappa R/o.Kudair Village and Mandal, Anantapur District. .... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ananthapur Division, Anantapur District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer Kudair Mandal, Ananthapur District. 3 The Station House Officer, Kudair Police Station, Ananthapur District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not taking steps pursuant to the petitioners representation dt.7.3.2005 and in not removing the obstructions put up over the Vagu Poramboke Land in Sy.No.507 of Kudair Village and Mandal, Ananthapur District as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioners representation dt.7.3.2005 and take appropriate steps thereon to remove the obstructions put up over the Vagu Poramboke Land and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.ROY REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE The Court, at the stage of admission, made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the alleged inaction on the part of the respondents in considering the representation made by the petitioner on 07.03.2005 complaining about the obstructions created by some third parties for the flow of water in a channel which is situated in S.No.507 adjacent to the land of the petitioner in S.No.508 of Kudair village and Mandal, Anantapur District. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents, without expressing any opinion as to the correctness of the allegations made by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 07.03.2005 and to take necessary action in accordance with law after affording due opportunity to the persons concerned to rebut the allegations made by the petitioner. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. No costs. ____________ 07.04.2005 sh To 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ananthapur Division, Anantapur District. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer Kudair Mandal, Ananthapur District. 3 The Station House Officer, Kudair Police Station, Ananthapur District. 4 2 CCs to G.P for Revenue, High Court Bldgs, Hyd. (OUT) 5 2 CD copies.