CWP(T) No.359 of 2008. 08.03.2010 Present: Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Additional Advocate General for the respondent. The disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner for disobedience of Government orders. Inquiry was held against the petitioner. The Inquiry Officer submitted his report to the Disciplinary Authority. The copy of the inquiry report was furnished to the petitioner. She made a representation against the same. The Disciplinary Authority vide order dated 14th June, 2006 has imposed a penalty of reduction to a lower stage in the time scale of pay for a period of 5 years without cumulative effect. A bare perusal of the order imposing the penalty reveals that the same is not a speaking order. The petitioner has preferred an appeal against the imposition of penalty order dated 14th June, 2006. Same has also been rejected by a non-speaking order on 15th December, 2006. It is well settled that any order which has civil and evil consequences must be speaking order. Consequently, the writ petition is allowed. Impugned Annexure A-4, dated 14th June, 2006 and Annexure A-6, dated 15th December, 2006 are quashed and set aside. The Disciplinary Authority is directed to pass fresh order after taking into consideration the representation made by the petitioner against the inquiry report. He shall pass a speaking order within a period of four weeks from the receipt of certified copy of the judgment. No costs. Copy dasti. (Rajiv Sharma), J. March 8, 2010. (sck).