IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 1908 of 2007 Date of Decision: 14.11. 2008 Balkar Ram ...... Appellant Versus Shangar Singh ...... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the appellant. **** Ajay Tewari, J. This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below with regard to the disputed portion GBEF. Both the Courts have held that the plaintiff-appellant has not been able to prove that this area was under his possession and that he was forcibly dispossessed by the respondents during the pendency of the suit. There is no documentary evidence on the file which may evidence this fact. Learned counsel has not been able to persuade me that this finding of fact is perverse or can not be held to arise from the evidence on the record of this case. Consequently I hold that the questions of law proposed do not arise in this appeal and dismiss the same. No costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE November 14, 2008 sunita