1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2090/1999 Bharatkumar Krishnakumar Jamadar ..versus.. Ram Prakash Lala and others =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-== Shri C.A.Joshi, counsel for petitioner. Shri A.A.Nail, counsel h/f Shri Sunil Manohar, counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. C ORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 13th JULY, 2010. Heard. 2) The landlord feeling aggrieved by the order of the appellate authority is in this Court. However, considering the rental agreement between the landlord and tenant, which indeed provided by clause 13(3), permitting the tenant to sublet the premises. It was indeed a permission. The tenant has allowed the canteen to be run. The petitioner therefore allowed the subletting. 3) Taking this aspect into consideration, I find the agreement between the landlord and tenant negated the contention of the landlord. Writ petition lacks merit. Dismissed. No costs. (K.U.Chandiwal) JUDGE. Rvjalit