S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6019/2007 Mathiyalagan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :: 25.09.2007 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Bharat Shrimali, for the petitioner/s. Mr. B.L. Tiwari, Dy. Govt. Advocate. .... This petition for writ is preferred seeking a direction for respondents not to interfere with petitioner's business at the towns of Balotara and Pachpadra in Dist. Barmer. It is alleged that only for the reason of being permanent resident of Tamilnadu, the respondents are harassing the petitioner and are not permitting him to undertake his business. Sh. B.L. Tiwari, Dy. Govt. Advocate has stated that the allegations made are not well founded and as a matter of fact the petitioner was subjected to certain inquiries by the Administration as a precautionary measure. Be that as it may, I consider it appropriate to dispose of this petition for writ with a direction to respondent No.2, 5 and 6 to ensure that no unwarranted interference be made in business of the petitioner if that is within the parameters of law and the petitioner is not found involved in any illegal activity. It shall be open for the respondents to ensure maintenance of law and order and for that purpose it is expected from the petitioner to co-operate with the respondents. (GOVIND MATHUR ),J. jgoyal