IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 29TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 7TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 25904 of 2011(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. FREEDA ELIZABETH ZACHARIAH, AGED 21 YEARS, D/O. ZACHARIAH P.S., PUTHUPPALLI KUNNEL HOUSE, MANGANAM P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 018. 2. SANGEETHA M., AGED 21 YEARS, D/O.MADHAVAN, "POURNAMI", CHAMUNDI PARAMBA, MALAPARAMBA P.O., CALICUT-673 009. 3. VARNA S., AGED 21 YEARS, D/O. SASIDHARAN M., CHERUVALLATHIL HOUSE, FAROOK COLLEGE P.O., CALICUT-673 632. BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-673 635. 2. THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-673 635. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC. FOR CALICUT UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MM WP(C)NO.25904/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1st PETITIONER ON 1-9-2011, REFERRED TO IN THE WRIT PETITION. P1(a) COPY CHALAN RECEIPT NOS.ZE-110901/01/87212 AND ZE-110901/01/87214 DATED ISSUED TO THE 1st PETITIONER TOWARDS REMITTANCE OF APPLICATION FEE. P2 COPY APPLICATION FOR RE-VALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2nd PETITIONER ON 1-9-2011, REFERRED TO IN THE WRIT PETITION P2(a) COPY CHALAN RECEIPT NO.ZE-110901/01/87206 DATED ISSUED TO THE 2nd PETITIONER TOWARDS REMITTANCE OF APPLICATION FEE. P3 COPY APPLICATION FORRE-VALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3rd PETITIONER ON 1-9-2011, REFERRED TO IN THE WRIT PETITION P3(a) COPY CHALAN RECEIPT NO.ZE-110901/01/87207 DATD ISSUED TO THE 3rd PETITIONER TOWARDS REMITTANCE OF APPLICATION FEE RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE MM ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).25904/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 29th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT 1.Petitioners applied for revaluation of the failed answer scripts in the 8th semester B.Tech (Computer Science) Examination vide Exts.P1, P2 & P3 and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation process. 2.I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3.Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4.Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs