IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1712 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: December 14, 2009. Rakesh Kumar & Ors. ...Petitioner(s) v. D.K. Goyal & anr. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri Peeush Gagneja, Advocate, for the petitioners. Shri Rupinder Khosla, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Shri M.C. Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.2. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): Reply on behalf of respondent No.1 has been filed. Along with this reply, a speaking order has been filed wherein it has been admitted that a sum of Rs.13,59,767/- with interest is required to be deposited in the GPF accounts of the petitioners. Shri Rupinder Khosla, on instructions from respondent No.1 who is present in court, has further stated that the aforesaid amount has been deposited in the name of the petitioners. In view thereof, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Rule discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival of this contempt petition if the stand taken by the respondents in their reply is found to be false. December 14, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge