1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.379 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.422 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO.598 OF 2010 Mohammad Nasimuddin @ Bihari Applicant versus State of Maharashtra and others Respondents Ms.Leela Malu i/by Leela D. Malu & Associates for applicant. Mr.Rajesh More, APP for State. CORAM : R.V.MORE, J. DATE : 16th November 2011 PC : 1. Present application is taken out for restoration of Criminal Application No.422 of 2010 which came to be dismissed on 15th July 2011 as conditional order dated 1st July 2011 was not complied with. By the said order, the applicant was granted two weeks time to remove office objections. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has given explanation in paragraphs 2 and 3 as to why the objections could not be removed within the stipulated period. I find that the explanation is satisfactory. Learned counsel for the applicant also makes a statement that the office objections will be removed within a period of two weeks from today. 2 3. In view of the statement made and for the reasons explained in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the application, the criminal application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Criminal Application No.422 of 2010 is restored to its file. (R.V.MORE, J.)