IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18617 of 2009 SRI BRAJ NANDAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 8.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Respondents have filed counter affidavit. They have brought on record a communication to show that the prayer for grant of subsidy was rejected by the concerned competent authority way back in the year, 1993 itself. If no subsidy was granted where is the occasion to credit this amount into the account of the petitioner to work out the outstanding dues and loan. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has absolutely no communication or knowledge about the rejection or non-grant of subsidy. Lack of knowledge of the above fact does not create a right in favour of the petitioner because the credit of the amount of subsidy is dependent upon the grant of subsidy. Non- grant of subsidy goes to the root of the matter. No relief can be granted in the present writ application. If he can assail the rejection of the subsidy claim he may do so, provided the law permits. This writ application is dismissed with the above liberty. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)