IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.397 of 2010(O&M) Date of decision: 21.1.2010 Angrejo Devi and others ......Petitioner(s) Versus Narender Singh and others ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Praveen Hans, Advocate for the petitioners. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) This is defendants' revision petition challenging the impugned order whereby plaintiff-respondents No.1 to 3 have been allowed to file a suit as indigent persons. Challenging the aforesaid order, learned counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that the aforesaid respondents are persons of sufficient means and in fact members of joint Hindu family coparcenary property and own property as per their own contentions raised in the suit and thus, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. I have perused the impugned order. In fact after scrutinizing the application of the respondents a report with regard to financial status of respondents No.1 to 3 was sought from the District Collector which is admitted on record of the case and according to that report, respondents No.1 to 3 do not own and possess any land in their parental village. Even otherwise, the Court below has noticed that ad valorem Court fee which is computable can be ordered to be paid at the time of grant of decree and no prejudice is going to be caused to the petitioners. It is well settled that the question of payment of necessary Court fee is primarily between the Court and the plaintiffs. CR No.397 of 2010(O&M) -2- For the aforesaid reasons, I am not inclined to invoke my jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in this petition. Disposed of. January 21, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE