IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.805 OF 1987 Kamrudin Khan & Anr. .. Plaintiffs. V/s. M/s.Hindustan Petroleum .. Defendants Corpn. Ltd., & Anr. None for plaintiffs. Mr.M.P.Lashkari i/b. Mulla & Mulla for defendant No.1. CORAM : Dr.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. DATED : 23rd November, 2006. P.C. On the last occasion, the attention of the Court was drawn to the fact that the learned Advocate who has filed his Vakalatnama has expired. The Registry was directed to issue a notice to the plaintiffs in order to enable them to make alternate arrangements. The registry has now placed its report and stated that the notice that was transmitted by the registry has been returned with the remark that plaintiff No.1 does not stay at the given address and the address of the second plaintiff was incomplete for service. The plaintiffs ought to have been diligent in prosecuting the proceedings and to keep track of the suit. The Court, in these circumstances, constrained to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution. (Dr.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)