IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12296 of 2008 GUDDU @ SUBODH SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 9.5.2008 Learned Advocate of the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph-11 of the bail application with regard to the date of custody of the petitioner. Petitioner Guddu @ Subodh Singh is an accused in a case instituted under Sections 395 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Advocate of the petitioner submitted that the name of the petitioner figured in the confessional statement of co-accused who was arrested at the spot while running away after committing dacoity along with other dacoits. Learned Advocate submitted that in spite of the fact that his name was disclosed by his co-associates, but after his arrest, he was never produced before the witnesses or the informant for identification. He further submitted that no looted article was recovered from his possession. Considering the submissions made, the petitioner Guddu @ Subodh Singh is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Akbarpur P.S. Case No. 69 of 2004. S.Ali (Syed Md. Mahfooz Alam, J.)