IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 2499 of 2009 Between: 1 Gurrapu Bapu S/o. Bheemalingu R/o. Gadderagadi, Kyathanpalli GP, Mandamarri Mandal, Adilabad Dist. 2 Gurrapu Madunaiah S/o. Bheemalingu R/o. Gadderagadi, Kyathanpalli GP, Mandamarri Mandal, Adilabad Dist. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Sub Inspector of Police Rama Krishnapur, P.S. Adilabad Dist. 2 Puskuri Vara Prasad Rao S/o. Venkat Narsinga Rao R/o. Hazipur Village, Mancherial Mandal, Adilabad Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring action of the 1st respondent interfering with civil disputes, when O.S.No. 1077 of 2005 is pending between the petitioners and the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, intentional, malafide and contrary to the law of the land and consequently direct the 1st respondent no to interfere in property civil disputes in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.K.V.BHANU PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioners aggrieved by the action of the 1st respondent – Sub Inspector of Police, Ramakrishnapur P.S. Adilabad District in interfering with the civil disputes between them and the 2nd respondent even during the pendency of suit O.S.No.1077 of 2005 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Luxxettipet. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Home and at their request the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. Pursuant to the notice issued by this Court on 11.2.2009, the 1st respondent has filed a detailed counter affidavit inter alia denying the allegations leveled against him and stated that he never sent any constable to the residence or lands of the petitioners nor threatened them to vacate the subject land. It is also stated that he never interfered with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. In view of the above counter averments, no further orders are required in the writ petition and recording the above averments, the writ petition is closed. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.18.2.2009 msv