IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7783 of 2011 ARBIND KUMAR @ ARBIND KUMAR MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 23.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in custody since 12.08.2010 in a case registered under Sections 406 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that one Avinash Kumar hired the jeep of the informant but on way this petitioner dislodged the driver and took the jeep. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner's complicity surfaced on the statement of the driver, Mithilesh who is resident of the neighbouring village of the petitioner. It is further submitted that Mithilesh was not the regular driver, moreover the name of the petitioner also surfaced on the basis of statement of one Sunil who has been granted bail by learned 2 court below itself. It is further submitted that other accused Sudhir has been granted bail by this Court. A statement has been made in the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Moreover, the recovery has been made from Garage of Sudhir Kumar who has been granted bail. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Barh in connection with S.T. No. 1877 of 2010 (arising out of Barh P.S. Case No. 222 of 2010). Safik ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)