IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 13514 of 2005 Between: 1 Smt. D. Vijaya W/o. Sri D. Gopal Reddy R/o. H.No.3-9-57/A, Sharadnagar Ramanthapur R.R.District Hyderabad. 2 Sri J .Raju S/. Late J.N.K.Krishna Murthy R/o. 7-1-1062, Shankar Veedhi Secunderabad ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector Hyderabad. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer Secunderabad Division. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer Shaikpet Mandal Banjara Hills Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MR. MOHD. ABID ALI FOR MR.V.RAJAGOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ASSIGNMENT The Court made the following : ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition itself is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. Heard Sri Mohd. Abid Ali, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignments). This writ petition is filed for a writ of Certiorari to quash proceedings, dated 18.06.2005 issued by respondent No.1 whereby the application of the petitioner for regularisation of 202 sq.yards of open area in T.S.No.1/1A/1, Block ‘B’, Ward No.10 of Krishnanagar, Shaikpet Village, Hyderabad District was rejected. At the hearing, Sri Mohd.Abid Ali, learned counsel representing the petitioners submitted that recently, the State Government issued G.O.Ms.No.166, dated 16.02.2008 providing for regularisation of unauthorized occupation of the Government land subject to the conditions contained therein and that the petitioners made an application for regularisation in pursuance of the said G.O. He, therefore, submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of with the direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the application made by the petitioners. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignments) submitted that he has no objection for such a direction being given. Having regard to the facts noted above, the writ petition is disposed of without giving any finding on the claim of the petitioners for regularisation. Respondent No.1 is directed to consider and dispose of the application, if any, made by the petitioners for regularisation of possession of the land in question in terms of G.O.Ms.No.166, dated 16.02.2008, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, interim order, dated 24.06.2005 is vacated, WPMP.No.17152 of 2005 is dismissed and WVMP.No.2158 of 2005 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NARAGJUNA REDDY, J 19th June, 2008. kvni