1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR . MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.547 OF 2011 (FOR REVIEW) IN WRIT PETITION NO.4089 OF 2010 (D) MAHATMA MATYAYA VYAWASAY SAHAKARI SANSTHA VS ASSITANT FISHERIES COMMISSIONER, WARDHA AND 2 OTHERS. ______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri P. D. Meghe Advocate for the applicant. Coram : A.H. JOSHI AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. Date : 4th AUGUST 2011. 1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. P. D. Meghe for the applicant. 2. According to the learned Advocate for applicant, this Court has rendered the judgment under review in disregard of the policy decision contained in Annexure-1 to the writ petition which is Government resolution dated 15-10-2001. 3. Perused the record and impugned order. 4. It is seen from the order sought to be reviewed that this Court has dealt with the aspect of eliminating the petitioner from the field of consideration while passing the order dated 15-3-2011 and in view of the categorization of the petitioner in category 'D' because of its irregularities, due to 2 which it was eliminated from the field of consideration over the Respondent NO.3. 5. The petitioner does not in any manner take exception to the said elimination, yet argues that the allotment should have been done by auction. 6. In any situation, the order passed by this Court suffers from an error manifest on record. 7. Therefore, there are no grounds made out by the petitioner for review. 8. Misc. Civil Application for review does not warrant any interference and is rejected. Judge Judge |mule|