1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 154/2011 (Joya @ Juhi w/o Mohd. Yasin Siddique and others vs.State of Maharashtra and others ) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr. Upadhyay, Advocate for petitioner Mr A.S.Sonare, APP for respondents 1 and 2 Mr A.S.Tiwari, Adv.for intervenor/complainant . CORAM : A.P.BHANGALE, J. DATED : 21st November, 2011. Heard. On 11th August, 2011, while passing the order this Court had kept the Application pending only with a view to note if there is any problem which may be brought to the notice of this Court regarding cohabitation between the petitioner nos.1 and 2. Learned Advocates representing the parties state that there is no problem whatsoever between the petitioner nos.1 and 2 and they are happily residing together and leading their marital life. Hence, there is no need to keep the Application pending. Application is disposed of. Learned Advocate for the respondents have no objection under the circumstances to quash the proceedings arising out of Crime No. 14/2011 for offence punishable under sections 363, 366 read with section 34 IPC. The criminal proceeding lodged at the instance of respondent no.3- Shri Pradip Chouhan is therefore, 2 quashed and set aside. Application is allowed accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE sahare