IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11573 of 2004 Sitaram Chaudhary son of Ram Ratan Chaudhary, resident of village and P.O. Sahasram, Police Station and Anchal Biraul, Munsif at present Benipur, sub Registry Bahera, District Darbhanga… …….Plaintiff/ Respondent no. /Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar ……Respondent Ist Set., 2. Ghanshyam Chaudhary, 3. Radheshyam Chaudhary, Both sons of late Ramasharay Chaudhary, resident of village and P.O. Sahasram, Pargana Ahilwar, Police Station and Anchal Biraul, District Darbhanga… …..Defendants no. 2 and 4 / Appellants Respondents IInd set. 4. Most Jashiya Devi wife of late Ramshray Chaudhary, 5. Ram Kumar Chaudhary, 6. Krishna Kumar Chaudhary, 7. Chandra Kumar Chaudhary, No. 4, 5, 6 are sons of late Ramashray Chaudhary, 8 . Deewakar Chaudhary, 9. Sudhakar Chaudhary, Minor sons of Ghanshyam Chaudhary, both under the Guardianship of natural guardian father, 10. Prabhakar Chaudhary, 11. Bucchi Babu Chaudhary, Minor sons of Radhe Shyam Chaudhary, both under the natural guardianship father, 12. Vivek Chaudhary, 13. Shailesh Chaudhary, Minors sons of Krishna Kumar Chaudhary, both under the guardianship of natural guardian father, 14. Tinku Chaudhary, minor son of Ram Kumar Chaudhary, Under the guardianship of natural guardian father. Respondents 2nd party Defendants …Ist Party 15. Khokhai Chaudhary son of late Thakko Chaudhary, 16. Ram Ratan Chaudhary, 17. Ram Jatan Chaudhary, 2 Both sons of Khokhai Chaudhary 18. Gobind Chaudhary, 19. Sanatan Chaudhary, Both sons of Ram Jatan Chaudhary, 20. Arun Chaudhary minor son of Sanatan Chaudhary, 21. Pappu Chaudhary under the guardianship of their father as natural guardian, 22. Kanhaiya Chaudhary son of Ram Ratan Chaudhary, All residents of village and P.O. Sahasram, Pragana Ahilwar, Police Station and Anchal Biraul, District Darbhanga…. Defendants / Respondents Respondents… IInd Set. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Manojeshwar Pd. Sinha, Mr. Madhukar Pandey, Advocates For the State : Mr. Bhupindra Narain Sinha, Advocate ………………. 8 30.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent no.2. No one appears on behalf of the other respondents. At the time of hearing of this case, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer only for a direction to the concerned court for expeditors disposal of the Partition Suit No. 6 of 1998 which is pending in the court of Munsif, Biraul at Benipur. Learned counsel for respondent no.2 does not have any objection to the prayer of the petitioner. As a result, this application is disposed of with a direction to the concerned court to dispose of the 3 aforesaid Partition Suit No. 6 of 1998 expeditiously, if possible after day to day hearing without granting adjournment unless it is warranted in the interest of justice, preferably within nine months. Sanjay-II ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)