CWP No. 1213 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 1213 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: July 28, 2010 Dr. Vipan Kumar .........PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab and others ......RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. DAG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing order dated 19.11.2009 (Annexure P-10) issued by respondent no. 2 i.e. Director, Medical Education and Research, Punjab, Chandigarh. 2. Gist of Annexure P-10, the impugned order, is that representation made by the petitioner has been dismissed. Resultantly, it has been decided by the respondent that the petitioner could not be given appointment as Lecturer/Senior Lecturer as in the application submitted by the petitioner, there is no mention of the fact that the petitioner had experience as Senior Resident in concerned speciality. The petitioner had been serving as a PCMS Doctor and had applied for selection as Lecturer/Senior Lecturer from amongst in-service candidates in the subject CWP No. 1213 of 2010 2 of Physiology having passed Post Graduate course and being eligible and suitable for appointment to the said post. 3. Short reply has been filed in Court wherefrom it transpires that vide Annexure R-1, the petitioner has been appointed as Lecturer in Department of Physiology. 4. On issuance of Annexure R-1 in the contention of learned counsel for the respondent-State, the matter has been rendered infructuous. 5. Disposed of as infructuous on the statement of learned counsel for the respondent. 28.07.2010 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE