IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 17TH JANUARY 2011 / 27TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 18 of 2011(B) ----------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SUNITHA K.R., UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, G.H.S.S., PANAMKUDY, KARANI P.O., MEENANGADI VIA, WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. 2. THE DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, WAYANAD DISTRICT. 4. HEADMISTRESS, G.H.S.S., PANAMKUDY, KARANI P.O., MEENANGADI VIA, WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.18 Of 2011-B ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 17th DAY OF JANUARY, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Exhibit P6 seniority list published by the Director of Higher Secondary Education. She is working as Upper Primary School Assistant(Chemistry), in the GHSS, Panamkudy, Wayanad. The petitioner has raised various contentions in the Writ Petition against excluding the petitioner from the final seniority list allegedly for the reason that her probation consequent to inter district transfer has not been declared. According to the petitioner, the probation was declared with effect from 1.12.2003 as per Exhibit P1 order. It is pointed out that even though these aspects were pointed out to the 2nd respondent by Exhibit P5 representation along with Exhibit P1 order, the same were not considered while issuing the final seniority list. Complaining about the same, the petitioner has already approached the Government by filing Exhibit P7 under Rule 27B of the KS & SSR. There will be a direction to the 1st respondent to take a decision on Exhibit P7, after hearing the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of receipt W.P.(C)No.18/11 -2- of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of the Writ Petition along with a copy of this judgment for compliance. It is made clear that any appointment made pursuant to the final seniority list Exhibit P6 will be subject to the result of Exhibit P7 appeal filed by the petitioner. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-( T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn True copy P.A.to Judge