IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13049 of 2008 BASUDEO PRASAD @ BASUDEO PRASAD YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 08.05.2008 Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Nawada Muffasil P.S. Case No. 63 of 2007 registered under sections 420/468/471 and 120B of Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that on perusal of the allegations levelled in the first information report; it would appear that the allegation is to the effect that the petitioner, who is the Panchatyat Sachiv, in conspiracy with the Mukhiya of the Gram Panchayat committed the alleged offence. It is submitted that the allegations levelled against this petitioner and the mukhiya are absolutely incorrect and no criminal liability can be fastened upon this petitioner for which due explanations were submitted by the Mukhiya before the District Magistrate. It is further submitted that the Mukhiya of the said Gram Panchayat namely Direndra Kumarhas been allowed anticipatory bail vide order dated 11.09.2007 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32946 of 2007. As such, this petitioner deserves to be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. Having considered the submissions and on perusal of the allegations levelled in the first information report as also taking into consideration the materials brought on record, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, Basudeo Prasad @ Basudeo Prasad Yadaqv be released 2 on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Nawada Muffasil P.S.Case No. 63 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)