1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.886 of 2010 IN STAMP NUMBER (APPLN.) NO.2998 OF 2010 AND STAMP NUMBER (APPLN.) NO.2998 OF 2010 in SECOND APPEAL NO.31/2001 SHRI SUBHASH S. S. KENKRE AND ORS., … APPLICANTS Versus SHRI KASHINATH MATU SAUNTO & ORS. …. RESPONDENT Ms. A. Pereira, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. A. Kansar, Advocate for respondent nos.1,2a,2b,3,4. Coram: A. P. Lavande, J. Date: 17th June, 2011. P.C: Heard Mr. Pereira, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Kansar, learned counsel for the respondent nos.1,2a,2b,3 and 4. Mr. Kansar states that he will file vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.1(a)within a period of two weeks. The statement is accepted. The legal representatives of respondent no.2(b)are permitted to be brought on record vide order passed in M.C.A. no.206/2011. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in bringing Legal representatives of respondent no.1 on record is condoned and the abatement qua respondent no.1(deceased) is set aside and the legal representative of respondent no.1 is permitted to be brought on record. Amendment to the cause title to be carried out within a period of two weeks. The applications stands disposed of. A. P. Lavande, J. Ap/-