IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2011 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28691 of 2011(J) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ T.K.MANOHARAN, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.KOCHU KELAN, VELIYIL HOUSE, PATHIRAPPALLY P.O., ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SIVAJI RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LOCAL SELF DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN-695 001 2. MARARIKULAM SOUTH GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KATTOOR P.O., KALAVOOR, ALAPPUZHA-688 546, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 3. THE EXE.ENGINEER, PWD ROADS DIVISION, COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA.PIN-688 001 4. THE DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA.PIN-680 001 5. K.P.ASOKAN, S/O.VASU, CHEMPAZHANTHIYIL, CHETTIKAD, PATHIRAPPALLY P.O., ALAPPUZHA-699 521. R1, R3 & R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MUHAMMED SHAH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/10/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.28691/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1- TRUE COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL ORDER NO.C4-909/08 DATED 5.11.2009 TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P1(A)- TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 5.11.2009 TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2- TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 10.2.2010 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3- TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 22.7.2010. EXHIBIT P4- TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT AND SKETCH DATED 21.2.2011 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P5- TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT ON 10.10.2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 28691 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of October, 2011 J U D G M E N T Ext.P5 is an appeal filed by the petitioner before the 4th respondent challenging Ext.P4 report. In this writ petition what is sought for by the petitioner is an expeditious disposal of Ext.P5. Taking note of the case of the petitioner and also regarding the pendency of Ext.P5 before the 4th respondent, without expressing anything on the merits of the contentions raised, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5. This shall be done by the 4th respondent with notice to the petitioner and the 5th respondent and as expeditiously as possible at any rate within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-