CWP No. 14165 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 14165 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: August 11, 2010 Smt. Naresh Rani .........PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab and others ......RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. S.K. Aneja, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner is entitled to appointment to the post of Teaching Fellow as she has been awarded 64.101 merit marks. The last candidate selected for the post of Teaching Fellow, General Category has secured 62.569 merit marks. The experience certificates of the petitioner have been disregarded and the merit marks of the petitioner have been brought down to 61.601. Learned counsel contends that since no reason was coming forth in document Annexure P-11, the petitioner served a legal notice, placed on record as Annexure P-8 dated 07.09.2009. No response thereto, however, has been received till date. 2. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner is entitled to know as to under what circumstances the qualification and experience of the petitioner has been ignored, the petitioner having competed. 3. I find a prima facie case in favour of the petitioner so as to entitle CWP No. 14165 of 2010 2 her to a response to legal notice Annexure P-8. 4. This petition is disposed of with directions to the respondents to take a decision on legal notice Annexure P-8 within a period of 2 months of receipt of certified copy of the order. The order needs to be a speaking and reasoned order, which would be conveyed to the petitioner. 11.08.2010 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE 1. To be referred to the reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?