IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30766 of 2009 1. MADHU @ MADHUSUDAN YADAV 2. SUMANTI DEVI ---------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 6.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The deceased died in his Sasural after his admission to Dr. Rahman’s clinic. Allegation is about poisoning. Submission is about having very cordial relation of wife and husband. Petitioner no.2 is wife of the deceased and petitioner no.1 is her brother but post mortem report is not speaking about death due to ailment or any accident. Viscera report is preserved. I am not going to doubt the prosecution case on the ground of non-examination of lady who informed about the deceased lying unconscious in a cattle house of accused and his (deceased’s) inability to disclose anything to his parents or his family members. Hence prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, after submission of charge sheet, on receipt of viscera report, poisoning if is not detected, petitioner’s prayer for bail shall be considered at the stage of charge. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)