IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.51 of 2011 Chanda Devi Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 2. 18.10.2011 Heard Shri Yarshraj Bardhan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant who seeks Special leave of this Court to appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 10.6.2011 passed by Shri Amit Kumar Pandey, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Saran at Chapra in Complaint Case No. 3194 of 2009( Tr. No. 802 of 2011). Without going to the factual details of the case and confining myself to the evidence of the complainant, (P.W. 4) whose evidence has been discussed in detail by the learned Magistrate, what I find is that really the lady was not tortured so as to giving a cause to file the complaint petition. It appears admitted by her during her cross-examination that her husband Pintu Singh had filed a case against her parents and her parents had forced her to file the present false case. This could have been sufficient for acquitting the accused. But, there are other circumstances appearing from the evidence of P.W. 4, the complainant which indicate that the case was really filed for putting pressure on her husband so as to walking out of the wedlock with which the lady was tied to. She admitted in her evidence that she did not want to go to her matrimonial house and it was her personal decision that she could get herself married to another person. This is the line of 2 evidence from which any inference especially that of putting criminal pressure may naturally be drawn. It is true that the learned Magistrate has not marshalled the facts properly, may be on account of inexperience, but ultimate result which he had chosen to deliver to the parties appears reasonable as a result of which it may not be said to be a perverse judgment as a result of which I find good reasons to refuse the prayer of the applicant. The application seeking special Leave is hereby dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)