IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39975 of 2010 JAI KUMAR YADAV, S/o Sri Mishri Lal Yadav, R/o Village – Gopalpur, P.S. – Singheshwar, District - Madhepura Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 09.03.2011 Heard Sri Anirudh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.M.P. Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, husband of the deceased and is in custody in Singheshwar P.S. Case No. 93 of 2009 registered for the offence under Sections 304B & 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner, that death had occurred due to abdominal pain and deceased was carrying at the time of death. It was further submitted that the parents of the deceased were also informed, and as such, the petitioner deserves to be released on bail. Sri A.M.P. Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for bail. It was submitted that in this case there is specific allegation of demand of dowry and due to non- fulfillment of the same the daughter of informant was done 2 to death and dead body was also disposed of without waiting for arrival of the parents of the deceased. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail stands rejected. The petitioner is in custody since 25.4.2010. Keeping in view the period of custody, the Court below is directed to take all steps, so that, case may come to its logical end without unnecessary delay. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)