IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10391 of 2011 Jitendra Kumar Sharma Versus Smt.Mamta Sharma & Anr ----------- 02. 05.07.2011. Heard the learned counsel, Sri Ambika Bhagat appearing on behalf of the petitioner. This writ application is directed against the order dated 29.03.2011 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamui in Matrimonial Case No.44 of 2009 whereby the learned Court below directed the petitioner to pay Rs.1500/- per month as maintenance to the respondent and also to pay Rs.5000/- per month as litigation cost. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the learned Court below has wrongly without assessing the income of petitioner directed to pay Rs.2000/- including litigation cost per month to the respondent. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below has considered the evidences adduced on behalf of the petitioner himself and came to the conclusion that the petitioner runs a furniture shop in Jamui market and then passed the order. In view of the above fact that the order passed is based on evidence, I do not find any illegality in the impugned order. Accordingly, it cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction. Accordingly this writ application is dismissed. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.) 2