Jll'::'^ ::<? ClaimanS H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR Sinale Bench : Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J, Miscelianeous ADpeal ( C 1 No.1065 of 2007 Nirmal Kumar Gond S/o Seetaram Gond, aged about 35 years, by caste Gond, r/o Viliage-KaudiyaRara, Thana- Pithoura, Tahsil & DistrictMahasamund versus Respbhderits ^ . S. Paivinder Singh Maan S/o Tehal Singh Maan, R/o iS.E. Road, Tatibandh, Raipur, Tah^il & District Raipur(C.G.) J (Owner of the Vehicle No.CG-04-G- 5786) - ' United India !nsurance Company LJniited, Regional Office, Jai! Road, Raipur,DistrictRaipur(C.G.) (Insurer of the Vehicle NO.CG-04.G- 5786) Memorandum of apoeal urider Section 173 of the Motor VehicSes Act. Present : Shri Sunil Sahu, counsei for the appeiiant. ORALORDER (Passed on 14'" September, 2007) Heard. (2) Beingaggrieved bythe impugned^warddated 26-07-2007 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mahasamund (henceforth 'the MACT') in Claim Case No. 126/2006, whsrebya sum of Rs.12,S38/- has ^ • • .; -^' been awarded towards compensation in an injury case, the appellant/claimant has preferred this appea! for enhancement of the •\ •• -•'.•. '•' . :••' ". .'-'.;•'..'. • "•••; • .'• " :• compensatipCT. • . ^ •' - , 2- (3) A perusal of the impugned award shows that the appellant/claimant did not adduce medica! evidence to prove grievous injury to the left shoulder. X-Ray reportwas aiso not filed to prove the fact of any grievous injury sustained by the appellant/claimant. Certificate -of permanent dlsability suffered by the appelianVclaimant was also not filed. The treatins doctor wasalso notexamined. .(4) In this view of the matter, no interferenee is calied for in the impugned award passed by the MACT. (5) ln the result, this appeal being devoid of mei-it is dtsmissed at the stage of admission. Sd/- DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge