IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 35 OF 2010 SHRI RAGHU C. GOMES ... Petitioner Versus PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, THE MAMLATDAR OF TISWADI TALUKA AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Pravin U. Naik,Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Susan Linhares,Additional Government Advocate for R.1 & R.2 Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 6th October, 2010 P.C: Heard Mr. Naik learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Linhares, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent nos.1 and 2. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the judgment and order dated 17/11/2009 passed by the Goa State Information Commissioner challenging the action of respondent no.1 in not providing information as sought by the petitioner. Perusal of the impugned judgment discloses that respondent no.1 could not provide copies of the records of the case which was disposed of in the year 1978 inspite of best efforts made by him, since he could not locate the file. In this factual background, I am of the considered opinion that the impugned order cannot be faulted. No jurisdictional error has been committed while passing the impugned order. Hence, the petition stands dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-