IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2392 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: October 20, 2011 Baljit Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sukhvinder Singh Nara, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. The petitioner has been convicted for commission of offence under Sections 279, 338 IPC and sentenced to undergo six months and one year rigorous imprisonment, respectively. 2. Notice of motion has been issued qua quantum of sentence only. 3. In the incident, on 11.10.2005 at about 11.15 AM, one Haryana Roadways Bus being driven by the petitioner Criminal Revision No.2392 of 2011 [2] came from bus stand, Kaithal. The bus was being driven in a rash and negligent manner. The petitioner-accused turned the bus at the round about rashly. Constable Rajinder Singh, who was on duty, gave a signal to the bus driver to stop the bus. The petitioner, however, did not stop the bus and rather, hit the bus in the right leg of the constable, due to which, foot of the constable had to be amputated. 4. It therefore transpires that the petitioner was driving so negligently and rashly in the city that he did not even care for the police official on duty on a crossing. In my considered opinion, the sentence awarded is commensurate with the offending action of the petitioner. 5. No ground for interference in revisional jurisdiction is made out. 6. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) October 20, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?