IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 6559 of 2008. Decided on: 6th September, 2010. Sudesh Kumar Sharma. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Petitioner is seeking directions to the respondents for counting of adhoc service followed by regularization for the purpose of pensionary benefits and increments. This question is covered by two judgments rendered by this Court in Paras Ram Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, CWP(T) No. 7712 of 2008 and Sita Ram Versus State of Himachal Pradesh, L.P.A. No. 36 of 2010, decided on 15th July, 2010. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for counting of adhoc service followed by regularization for the purpose of pensionary benefits and increments. However, as far as the relief with regard to higher pay scale is concerned, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the second respondent within a period of three 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. weeks from today. Thereafter, the same shall be decided by the second respondent in accordance with law by passing a speaking order within a further period of six weeks after the production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge 6th September, 2010. (bhupender)