IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.20874 -M of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 4, 2011 DARSHAN SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS MUKHTIAR KAUR .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. VK Shukla, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Roopak Bansal, Advocate, for respondent. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 Order dated 12.3.2004 (Annexure P-1) was passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Baghapurana, whereby, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 133, Code of Criminal Procedure, 4 feet high boundary wall from a public street was directed to be removed. 2 The petitioner filed a revision against the said order after nearly two years, which has been dismissed in view of delay, vide order dated 18.5.2010 (Annexure P-3), passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Moga. 3 Learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that the wall was demolished on 9.6.2004 and, therefore, no purpose in law would be served by hearing the petitioner on merits by the revisional court. Criminal Misc. No.20874 -M of 2010 (O&M) 2 4 The factum of demolition of the wall/removal of nuisance has not been disputed. 5 In view of the above and also because there is no plausible explanation coming forth for filing the revision after nearly two years, I find that the petition is bereft of merit and is, therefore, dismissed. August 4, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?