IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 32506 of 2009 Date of decision: 30.03.2010 Harjit Kaur and another ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. K C Gupta, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the respondent - State Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 2 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Petitioner No. 1 is the mother-in-law, who has since died, whereas, petitioner No. 2 is the unmarried sister-in-law of the complainant. Mr. K C Gupta, Sr. DAG, Haryana states that petitioner No. 2 has since joined the investigation. In view of the above, the order dated 18.11.2009 passed by this Court is made absolute. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 30.03.2010 mohan