IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF NOVEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P. No.23955 of 2011 Between: N.M.Zeelan … Petitioner And The Regional manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Anantapur Region, Anantapur and another. … Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P. No.23955 of 2011 ORDER: Questioning the impugned order dated 03.01.2009, wherein the 2nd respondent, Depot Manager, terminated the contract engagement of the petitioner, filed the present writ petition. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as contract Driver on 18.06.2008 by the duly constituted selection committee and posted to the 2nd respondent’s depot. While so, he was absent from duties from 30.11.2008 onwards due to viral fever and ill health and the same was intimated to the duty controller. While he was under treatment, the 2nd respondent issued the impugned order dated 03.01.2009. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondents have issued the impugned termination order dated 03.01.2009 without issuing any notice or without conducting any enquiry. Therefore, the same is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice. He also submitted that in similar circumstances, this Court passed the order on 23.06.2011 in W.P. No.339 of 2011 directing the respondents therein to reinstate the petitioner therein into service forthwith. Therefore, the petitioner herein is also entitled to similar relief granted in the said writ petition. On the other hand, the learned standing counsel for the respondents Corporation would submit that the petitioner did not evince any interest in performing his duties. The petitioner was terminated from service on the ground of irregular and bad attendance maintained by him. The petitioner absented from duties just after few months of his contract appointment. Therefore, the impugned order is legal and sustainable. But, however, she does not dispute the order passed in similar case by this Court in W.P. No. 339 of 2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondents. Admittedly, the petitioner appointment is on contractual basis and he absented from attending duties from 30.11.2008 onwards and therefore, the respondents have terminated the services of the petitioner, which is challenged in the present writ petition. This Court in W.P. No.339 of 2011, while allowing the same, observed as under: “This Court took the view that the very terms of the contract indicate the Service Regulations issued by the Corporation applied to such employees also and in a batch of writ petitions, the orders of termination passed by the Corporation, without issuing show cause notice and without conducting domestic enquiry, were set aside. Hence, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. The petitioner shall be reinstated into service forthwith, but he shall not be entitled to the back wages. It shall be open to the respondents to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner in accordance with law, if they still feel that the same is necessary. There shall be no order as to costs.” From a perusal of the impugned order dated 03.01.2009, it is clear that the services of the petitioner was terminated on the ground of irregular attendance and no notice was issued and no enquiry was conducted before passing the impugned order. Therefore, as this writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed in W.P. No.339 of 2001, following the said order, this writ petition is disposed of as under: The impugned order dated 03.01.2009 is set aside and consequently directed the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service forthwith but without back wages. It is open for the respondents to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner, in accordance with law, if they still feel that the same is necessary. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH Date: 09.11.2011 LSK