1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2522 OF 2009 Pappu @ Rajendra Guruprasad Jaiswal Versus The State of Maharashtra and another. *** Ms. Monika G. Purnapatre, Advocate for the Applicants. Mrs. B. R. Khekale, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** 1. Heard. Perused papers and report. Several persons are implicated by the deceased through his so called death note dated 21st June, 2009. Two accused were put under custody and released while the present accused applicant Pappu @ Rajendra has sought pre- arrest bail. 2. The record of the deceased indicate that he was virtually bankrupt and had several vices to his credit, though called himself to be a teacher. The deceased was habitual to drinks and probably in that melee the implication of present applicant Pappu @ Rajendra is surfaced. Custodial interrogation at this stage is not warranted. Accused hails from Navapur and shall make himself available to the investigator. Hence, order. 3. In the event of arrest of the accused applicant 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. Pappu @ Rajendra Guruprasad Jaiswal in Crime NO. 68 of 2009, he be released on his furnishing P.R.Bond and surety in the sum of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees ten thousand only]. 4. The accused applicant shall attend the concerned police on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m. to 03.00 p.m. for six months. 5. He shall not pressurise the witnesses particularly legal representative of the deceased. 6. Application allowed in above terms. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:10/08/2009. ans/2522