IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.685 of 2009 MANOJ KUMAR & ANR Versus HARISH LAL GOYEN & ORS ----------- 2. 30/04/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This revision application has been filed by the defendant petitioners against order dated 18.3.2009 passed by learned Sub-Judge-I, Gaya in Title Suit No.221 of 2003. By the said order, learned court below has rejected the petition of the defendant filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejecting the plaint. This Court has gone through the order of the learned court below. Since the question raised by the defendant with regard to the suit being barred under any law was not very clearly considered by learned court below in its order, this court has considered the pleadings made in the plaint also which has been annexed as Annexure-1. From the pleadings made in the plaint, prima facie it does not appear that the relief sought for by the plaintiff is barred by any law. In that view of the matter, this Court does not consider it a fit and proper case for - 2 - interference under the revisional jurisdiction and therefore, this revision application is dismissed. However, learned court below shall frame specific issues as have been raised by the defendants in their written statement for its consideration. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)