fi? F8?""'"*a s'Siu ' Se^ Lu.S'•„• su.l^'6 c ,s IN THE HQN'BLE MIGH COLtRTOF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPURfC.G.y WFUTPETFnONfSyNO.i<I/-SoF2007fS.B.) PETmONERS ./^ ./^ <^^ ^•^~^ ^^/ APARNA MALVIYA •^- RESPONDENTS ^i. Smt. Shakeela Begum, aged about25 years, Wife ofShri Akeet Ahmed, Aanganbadi Assistant (Sahayika), Resident of Phoolpadarpara Ward NQ.9, <3eedam, District South Bastar Dantewada CC.G.); 2. Smt. Shanna Begum, aged about 29 y^ars/ Wife of Shri Liyakat, Aanganbadi Assistant CSahayika), Resident of Dewanganpara Ward No.9, Geedam, District South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.). 3. Smt. Fareeda Begum,aged about 32 years, Wife of Shri Naushad, Aanganbadi Assistant (Sahiayjka), Resident of P.W.D. Para, Ward No.7, Geedam, District South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State ofChhattisgarh,Through: The Secretary, Department of Women and Child Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. BRawan,, Raipur(C.G^!). r^:'"!>'t3i3S3q''iBI^S^i'~':,-7J"£1;i"3 T'^'-^* •:-^^^'.^^^•IL^^&"S<J a--^i'"SSaSaaiBEWa< 'y ^? ,2. The Collector, Dantewada, District South Bastar(C.G.). - ^ 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Dantewada, District South Bastar (C.G.). f,4. The District Programme Officer, Woman and Child Development Dantewada, District South Bastar (C.G.). ^5. The Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat Geedam, District South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.). WRFT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 225 OFTHECONSTrTUTION QFINDIA ^ HI6H€OURTOFCHHATT[S6ARH^T«n.ASPUR W.P.(s)No.818of 2007 Petitioners Smt. Shakeela Begum ond others Vepsus Respondents : Sterteof Chhattisgarh Aothers Singte Bench: 1-lon'bleAAr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Shrl P.K.C. Tlwari, Senlor Advocate wi1+l Shri Avinash K. Mishra, Advocffte forthe Petitioner. Shri AjayDwivedi,Panel lonwyer for the respondents/State. ORDER yassed on thisl2ttl day of February, 2007) The following order of the Court' was passed by Satish X. AgnihoW, J. 1. Laamed counssl appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners wepe appointed as Awiganwadi V.wyokarhss (Workers) by the J'anpad Panchoyat by -riie order dated 22.5.2006 (AnnexureP/2). Therenfter, the petitioners had undergone required tniining for aperiod of one month. After having completed the required training, the petitioners have been dppointed as Aanganwadi Karydkartas (Workers). 2. By the order dated 10.1.2007 (AnnexureP/l),therespondentNo. 2 cancelled the selection of Aangonwadi KaryakartaS (Workers) in several centres i.e. Ndka Para. bewangan Para, P.W.D. Parn. Phoolpadar Para, Against the said order, the petitioners have filed this petition without availing aitemative remedy of statutory appeal to the Director, "•S,X ^ Panehayat undep the provisions of Rule 3 ^of the Madhya Prsadesh PanchayatS(AppealandRevision)Ryles, 1995. 3/ Lecrned coun^! eppefln'ing for the petitioners seeks permissionof this C^urt' to wil+iclraw this petitiQn with liberty to file the statutory appeal ^ before the concemed authority. It is ordered otccordingly. Delay, if any. ? occurred in pursuing this niatter mdy not be tatten into account while entert'aining the appeal pf the petitioners, 4. 7he writ petition is accordingly disposed of summarilY. No order as •i'o' costs. Certified copy^os {aer rutes. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotrl Judge ^alBttlHSB'teiwnffimSgS^i^S&^