1 wp-934-2011 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 934 OF 2011 Mrs. Anita Vishnu Khande ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondent Mr.P.B.Kakade for petitioner. Dr.F.R. Shaikh, APP for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D.SALVI, JJ. June 13, 2011. P.C. 1. We have heard Mr.Kakade, the learned counsel for the petitioner. We also perused a copy of the complaint purportedly lodged by the petitioner with Deonar Police Station on 5/6/2010. Dr. Shaikh, learned APP on instructions states that pursuant to her complaint the petitioner’s statement came to be recorded on 17/7/2010. We are also informed that 2 wp-934-2011 the petitioner is an accused in C.R.No.244 of 2010 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323 and 326 of IPC with the said Police Station. Another C.R. i.e. C.R.No.18 of 2011 has also been registered against her in which she was arrested and subsequently released on bail. She is shown to be absconding in C.R.No.244 of 2010. 2. Dr. Shaikh has placed before us the investigation papers and on perusal of the same, it cannot be said that the police have not taken cognizance of the petitioner’s complaint and on the other hand after the statement of the petitioner was recorded, the statements of Mrs. Khatija Firoz Khan and Firoz Mohammad Idris Khan have also been recorded. 3. Hence there is no case made out for issuing directions as prayed for. The petition is rejected. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)