,SiNGLEBF H c^-^-^Ys^ m COURT OF /- ^6^ /2005 'etition uader Article 326/237 oftlieConstitution oflndial /^ ^y/ .^^^^ Po^^"// A^!^ ^y^ .^yy <^y/ ' ^'^' ^ Brahma N and Deshlahar, aged about 42 years, S/o Shri Girdharilal Deshlahara, at present worldng as a Asstt. Teacher, Pnmanr Schoql Otebandh, Tah-sil Gunderdefai, Distt. Durg, C.G. ^ i «•A ^.^ /i; 3tate ofC.bha.ttisga.rh, througli the Seeretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bnawan, Raipur .iC.G.i ;: • : . ' ./•^ y/ /^/--"^- .:-;. .. ... . _ _. - • • /^7^~ Y'2} CoUBctorDurg, Dl5tt,Durg,G.G, y • ' •:. . : • o- y ^3} DistrictEducation.Officer, Durg, C.G. ^4) Block EduGatio&Officer,uuiid.erdehl, Distt.BurgjC.G. <^5) Head Master Prua.aty School Otetia.n.dti Gunjdfirdfihi, Distt. Durg, C.G. AR3 l^;:^26^aTOF sskTia .gTs¥ t'-Sfitffc 'sstf»r^8"ejFVfft-tf»T'® -* •* <. OLa.l-BA^ULn.'ea-B.^» ^?Jfc <-Aa."^?-. aJ^t%-A^-SU'A»ni-*-A'^ » As stated in. fae cause title afcova. XI-HC-78 d-OTt^<i^iwr;B^Fgy^i^ tPicCTWW^ "•"•:^-:i•^•6-0-6 •. .s—, 3H^9rqgi^f^^^i an^CT^TftsiTO aairaii^sranri'iF WttW^fttTsn^CT v: 'M.!<rd4)-1 *lt*fdl"^fe><II •<jiawdK ^art^tr^?; 26/09/2005 Shri Vishnu Koshta, leai|ned counsel for the petitioner. Shri. Bhaskar Pyasi, Pan^l Lawyer for fhe State. Heanl. presenfly workuig as Assistaat Teacher has challenged his ti^nsfer order dated 31/S/ 2005, The grounds of chaUenge are fhat{the traasfer has been effected in the ban period and same is aga^ust fhe poUcy framed'by the State GoveFaiiient The chUdren fof the petitioner are school goiug Isfer in mid-session would effect their the petitioner subtmts that at fhe -, fhere is no Hlgh School. Therefore, on fhese gn3unds, the order o|f transfer be quashed. On the veiy joutset, lea|-ned coitnsel for the petitioner niakes )resent, fhis petition inay be disposed ofwitha liberty tct the petttiotier to file a detailed represeiitatton to ffie conceraed authority and fhe coricemed authonty inay also be directed fo dispose of his represenlation wifhin fhe stipulated period granted by this Court^ This luuited prayer |tnade by learaed couaisel for the petitioner is notopposed by l.earaed counsel for fhe State. The prayer is allowed. It is hereby directed tyatlfso advised, the petitioner may file a detaHed represeirtation faisuig atl his grievaDces before thc coiupetent authoiily alongw^fh certified copy offhis order withia a XI-HC-78 ^5 SJt'q'-'qKtKwiwiHl'd^^l^Cwiiy ^m^iiwfw "•••——••— • •.................. 31'I^?T<RW^^igEFS) aii^nwTft-il* ?rar3irt»id>*fi<ti sH' ^ ^RiTWdRd SIltCT period of 1 inonth fi-oin today fhe coinpeteat authorily sh^U possible preferably wifhin a| filuig/receipt of the aforesaid With the above obsert disposedofat tfais stage. C.C. as per rules. and if such a represeiitation is filed, dispose of fhe same as early as period of one inonfh froin date of tiepresentation.. ; ration.s, fhis petition staads finally Sd/- Sunil KumarSinha Judge ;i%<pi^1w<R1ri ^imwT^Ft^^xf^^p^ ^stf^iaii^n