1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17/06/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN Writ Petition (MD) No.4150 of 2011 K.Shanthi W/o.Nagasundaram 182D Bharathi nagar Pattinamkathan Ramnad Taluk Ramnad District. ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board College Road Chennai – 600 006. 2.The Director, Department of School Education, Chennai. 3.The District Employment Officer, District Employment Office, Ramanathapuram ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to issue appointment order to the petitioner for the post of 'Sewing Teacher' pursuant to selection vide proceedings of 1st respondent in Rc.No.1581/A4/2009 dated 22.10.2010 and to grant such further relief. For petitioner ...Mr.C.Kasirajan For Respondents ...Mr.B.Pugalendhi Spl.Govt. Pleader O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. By consent, the Writ petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition for a mandamus directing the respondents to issue appointment order to the petitioner for the post of 'Sewing Teacher' pursuant to selection vide proceedings of 1st respondent in Rc.No.1581/A4/2009 dated 22.10.2010 and to grant such further relief. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that her name has been sponsored by the third respondent for the post of Sewing Teacher on the basis of the seniority of registration with the first respondent. The first respondent called her to produce all the original certificates and she did so. The first respondent by his proceeding dated 22.10.2010 has informed her that she has been provisionally selected for the post of Sewing Teacher. She has also attended the counselling conducted by the second respondent on 02.12.2010 and she has been informed that her result has been withheld. It https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 has been informed that the first respondent has sought for certain particulars, such as month, date and year of registration with the third respondent. She has been further assured that as and when the first respondent gets the relevant particulars from the third respondent, appointment order will be issued. However, the third respondent has not furnished any particulars and the first respondent has withheld her appointment order. The petitioner, therefore, has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition. 5. Considering the above facts and circumstances, I am of the considered view that when the first respondent has sought some information about the petitioner with the third respondent, the third respondent is expected to furnish all the particulars to the first respondent. Since the third respondent has not furnished the particulars, perhaps, the first respondent has not given any appointment order to the petitioner. Hence, it would be suffice to direct the third respondent to furnish all the particulars, which has been sought for by the first respondent about the petitioner, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the same, the first respondent is directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment and pass suitable orders within a period of one month thereafter. The Writ Petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(LA) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1.The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board College Road Chennai – 600 006. 2.The Director, Department of School Education, Chennai. 3.The District Employment Officer, District Employment Office, Ramanathapuram RR W.P.(MD) No.4150 of 2011 17.06.2011 TR : 24.06.2011 : 2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/