CWP(T) No. 6031 of 2008 09.11.2010 Present: Mr. H. K. Paul, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents/State. Undisputedly petitioner was only appointed as a Dental Attendant. Undoubtedly he does not fulfill the eligibility criteria laid down for appointment to the post of Dental Hygienist. Though seriously disputed but assuming hypothetically that he may have been discharging duties of a Dental Hygienist for some time, that fact alone would not give him a right of appointment as a Dental Hygienist or entitle him for wages equivalent to that of a Dental Hygienist. No legally enforceable right of the petitioner stands violated. Consequently present petition without any merits is dismissed. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. November 9, 2010 (PK)