WA 292/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.SAIKIA (Amitava Roy, J) Heard Mr Banerjee, learned senior counsel for the appellant and Mr Deka, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, Govt. of Assam. The pleaded case of the appellant/ writ petitioner is that he was appoin ted on 16.11.94 as an Assistant Teacher in Hakama MN ME School, Bilasipara on ad -hoc basis initially for a period of three months or until selected by the Advis ory Board, Bilasipara. It is his case that his aforementioned appointment was ap proved by the Advisory Board. Thereafter, he has continued in service to the sat isfaction of all concerned. However, as his services have not been regularized, he approached this Court with WP(C) No. 1155/2009 which has since been rejected by the judgment and order appealed against. In course of the hearing, the learned senior counsel for the appellant, on an assessment of the fact situation and the law involved, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the appeal and advise the appellant to pursue his remedi es otherwise available in law. Mr Deka, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department has not offered any comment on the aforestated prayer made on behalf of the appellant. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on a consideration of the contextual facts, we permit the withdrawal of the appeal. It is made clear that we have not dealt with either the issues involved or the findings recorded in the impugned judgment and order on merit. It would be open for the appellant, if so advised, to file an appropriat e representation before the concerned departmental/ State authority seeking redr ess. If that is done, it is expected that the said authority would do the needfu l having regard to the factual background, however, strictly in accordance with law. The appeal stands disposed with the above observation.