IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 11th day of May, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 501 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Ajay Chaudhary .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party Arising out of Crime No. 68/2010, U/s 406, 506 IPC, PS Laksar, District Haridwar. May 11, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. KS Verma, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant argued that there is no direct evidence collected by the prosecution to connect the applicant with the alleged crime. He further argued that the accused applicant has got no previous criminal history, who is in jail since last one month. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Ajay Chaudhary be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of JM, Laksar. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 11.5.2010 PRABODH