Lsp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3169 of 2001 Jai Hind Co-operative Bank Ltd. ...Petitioner V/s. Mr.H.B.Yadav & 19 others ...Respondents Mr.P.K.Rele, Senior Advocate with Mr.Piyush Shah for the Petitioner Mr.T.R.Yadav for the Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 3231 of 2001 PETITION NO. 3231 of 2001 PETITION NO. 3231 of 2001 WITH CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2721 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.2721 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.2721 OF 2007 Mr.H.B.Yadav & ors. ...Petitioner V/s. Jai Hind Co-op. Bank Ltd. & ors. ...Respondents Mr.T.R.Yadav for the Petitioner Mr.P.K.Rele, Senior Advocate with Mr.Piyush Shah for the Respondents CORAM CORAM CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. DATED DATED DATED : 8th January, 2008 : 8th January, 2008 : 8th January, 2008 P.C. Heard Mr.Rele, the Learned Senior Counsel with Mr.Piyush Shah for the Petitioner Bank in Writ Petition No. 3169/2001 and Mr.Yadav,the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.3231/2001. Both these petitions challenge the Judgement and Order dated 27-4-2001 rendered by the Learned Member of the 2 Industrial Court in Complaint(ULP) No. 157/1998. 2. Civil Application No.2721/2007 has been filed in Writ Petition No. 3231/2001 by the employees praying for directions to the Respondent Bank to pay the arrears of wages for the period from 1-1-1998 to 31-3-2001. In the said application affidavit in reply has been filed by Shri V.V.Samant, Manager of the Bank and in the said affidavit it has been stated that all the employees concerned in the Civil Applications as well as in the Writ Petitions have accepted the benefits arising out of the notice dated 31-1-1998 as well as 24-5-2002 and an agreement has been entered between the Bank and the employees for settlement of their dispute which are subject matters of these petitions. Mr.Rele, the Learned Senior Counsel, therefore, prayed for disposal of these petitions by way of the settlement entered into between the parties during the intervening period. 3. Mr.Yadav, the Learned Counsel for the employees had stated on instructions that consequent to the settlement between the parties, the arrears have been received by the employees concerned and by the said settlement, all the disputes which are subject matter of these petitions have been settled. He, therefore, has no objection for disposal of the petitions in view of the settlement between the parties. 3 4. Hence, the Petitions are disposed in terms of the settlement signed between the parties. Rule discharged with no order as to costs. 5. Civil Application is disposed off. [B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.] [B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.] [B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.]