IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14846 of 2010 HARI GURO SON OF LATE GANESHI GURO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.5.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 2, 9, 27, 31, 39, 50 and 51 of the Wild Life Protection Act. Considering that the petitioner is named in the first information report on the basis of confessional statement of the co- accused, who was found in possession of leopard skin, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious nature of the offence. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )