IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2010 / 8TH MAGHA 1931 RP.No. 32 of 2010(T) -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.16997/2009 Dated 24/08/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): RESPONDENTS IN W.P.(C): ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN, 18, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, SHAHID JEET SINGH MARG, NEW DELHI-16, THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN, IIT CAMPUS, CHENNAI REGION, CHENNAI-36. BY ADV. M/S.IYER & IYER, SC.KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA, MR.V.V.ASOKAN. RESPONDENT(S): PETITIONERS IN W.P.(C): ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1. KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA NON-TEACHING STAFF ASSOCIATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY- C.S.PREM,S/O.LATE C.G.STEPHEN,LOWER DIVISON CLERK, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA NO.2, COCHIN-682 004, RESIDING AT CHIRAMEL HOUSE, THOPPUMPADY, KOCHI-682 005. 2. K.L.JOSEY, S/O.LONAPPAN, LAB ATTENDANT, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA NO.2, COCHIN-682 004 AND TREASURER, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA NON-TEACHING STAFF ASSOCIATION, RESIDING AT KUTTASSERY HOUSE, ATTATHARA PADOM, PALLURUTHY, COCHIN-682 006. BY ADV. MR. T.C.GOVINDASWAMY THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- R.P.No.32 OF 2010 IN W.P.(C) No.16997 OF 2009 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of January, 2010. O R D E R This review petition is filed by the respondents 1 and 2 in the writ petition. It is averred in the review petition that an association which is having a minimum of 35% of total number of category employees alone gets recognition as per the regulations of the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan. It is in that ground, the review petitioners seek for modification of the directions issued by this Court. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners submitted that the fact that the 1st petitioner association is a recognized one, as mentioned in paragraph 1 of the writ petition, is not even disputed in the review petition. It is clarified that the directions issued by this Court to circulate Exhibit P2 among the officers of the KVS and to upload the same on the website will be implemented provided the 1st petitioner association is having recognition. Learned counsel R.P. No.32/2010 2 appearing for the writ petitioners submitted that the time provided by this Court in the impugned judgment is already over and a limited period will have to be fixed now in the light of the expiry of the period. Appropriate action will be taken within a period of three weeks from today. This review petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp