IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN MONDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2009 / 8TH ASHADHA 1931 RP.No. 512 of 2009(E) ------------------------------ (INTERIM ORDER DATED 27/02/2009 IN W.P.(C).NO.2988/2009) .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/ R1 TO 3 IN W.P.(C): -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, THIRUVALLA. BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN. RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & R4 TO 7 IN W.P.(C): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SUJA PHILIP, U.P.S.A., ST.THOMAS H.S.S. ERAVIPEROOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2. THE MANAGER, ST.JOHN'S L.P.S., ERAVIPEROOR. 3. SMT.LEENA PHILIP, LPSA, ST.JOHN'S LPS, ERAVIPEROOR. 4. SMT.SOBY GEORGE, W/O.THOMAS GEORGE, OLLASSERIMANNIL, PURAMATTOM P.O., THIRUVALLA. 5. JALAJAKUMARI.G., NAKKAKAMALAYIL HOUSE, PUTHENPURAYIL. OTHARA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. R1 BY ADV. MR. P.C. SASIDHARAN. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/06/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= R.P. No. 512/2009 in W.P.(C) No. 2988/2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this the 29th day of June, 2009 O R D E R The learned Government Pleader submits that without prejudice the review petitioners' right to contest the writ petition on all available grounds, the review petitioners have implemented the order passed by this Court on 27-2-2009 by paying salary and allowances to the petitioners and the party respondents in W.P.(C) No.2988 of 2009. In the light of the said submission, I am of the opinion that this review petition can be closed reserving liberty with the review petitioners to contest the writ petition on the merits. In the result, the review petition is closed reserving liberty with the review petitioners to contest the writ petition on all available grounds. It is clarified that payment of salary and allowances to the writ petitioners and the party respondents therein will be subject to further orders to be passed in the writ petition. P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. mn.