IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 29TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 8TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 35596 of 2010(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. T.M.MUHAMMED KUNJU, S/O.MANCHIKHAN RAWTHER, AGED 79 YEARS, RESIDING AT THAZHATHEDATHU, P.O.KANGAZHA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. M.K.ASSIS, S/O.KASSIM RAWTHER, AGED 45 YEARS, MAZHAVANCHERIL HOUSE, P.O.KANJIRAPPARA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA SRI.T.V.VIJAYARAJAN SRI.M.SAJJAD SRI.V.K.GOPALAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686001. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANJIRAPALLY, P.O.PONKUNNAM-686506, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 5. THE MANAGER, KANGAZHA MUSLIM HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, P.O.KANGAZHA-686541, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. GOVT. PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.35596 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 29th day of November, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners are members of the Kangazha Muslim Puthur Pally Jama-Ath. That Jama-Ath is running an aided school by name “Kangazha Muslim Higher Secondary School, Kottayam”. Petitioners' grievance in this writ petition is that an unrecognized school is being conducted in the premises, where their aided school is functioning, which is against the policy of the Government. Pointing out this alleged illegality, the petitioners have filed Ext.P7 representation before the 3rd respondent. For the present, the petitioners would be satisfied with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P7 expeditiously. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In the nature of the order I propose to pass, I do not think it necessary to issue notice to the 5th respondent. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the 5th respondent. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2