IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31654 of 2011 Sevak Sah @ Ram Sevak Sah, son of late Palat Sah Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 23.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 26.7.2010 since there was an allegation against him of having thrown acid on the Informant and such an injury was found on his person by the Doctor. The prayer for bail has been renewed on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 18.1.2010 and there is no sufficient progress in trial. The impugned order shows that in fact, three witnesses have been examined and five more are left to be examined for which non-bailable warrants have been issued. Considering the same, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The Trial Court (IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Samastipur) is directed to send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for production of the witnesses along with a copy of this order in connection with Sessions Trial No. 154 of 2010 arising out of Mohiddin Nagar (M. Nagar) P.S. Case No. 17 of 2009, to the Superintendent of Police, Samastipur, and 2 the Superintendent of Police, Samastipur, is directed to ensure production of the witnesses on the date so fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further delay in the trial. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)