AHONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:1169 OF 2010 Dated: 19.3.2010 Between: 1. P. Vijay Kumar and another. ..Petitioners And P. Bharadwaj. .. Respondent. This Court made the following HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:1169 OF 2010 ORDER: The present revision petition is directed as against the order dated 14.12.2009 in I.A.No.879 of 2009 in O.S.No.3999 of 2008 passed by the learned II Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The petitioners herein are the defendants and the respondent is the plaintiff before the Court below. The petitioners-defendants filed the above application under Order 13 Rule 8 CPC r/w Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act to send the document viz., Gift Settlement deed dated 20.7.1984 to the office of the Sub-Registrar concerned i.e., Ashoknagar/Chikkadpally, for evaluation. The Court below having observed that the Court had already verified stamp duty and penalty and permitted to receive the document and if the petitioners have any grievance against the orders dated 17.8.2009, they ought to have preferred a revision, but cannot file the petition, dismissed the application. Feeling aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition has been preferred. Heard the learned Counsel and perused the material available on record. On a perusal of the material on record, it is apparent that during the course of examination of P.W.1, the petitioners-defendants objected to mark the document in question and after hearing the objections on either side, on 17.8.2009, the Court below ordered that the document can be marked for collateral purpose. Subsequently, on 31.8.2009, the document in question was marked. If the defendants feel aggrieved, they ought to have challenged the order, dated 17.8.2009. But the approach of the petitioners-defendants by way of the above application again, after the document was marked, is unsustainable. In this view of the matter, I have no hesitation to hold that the order of the Court below does not suffer from any illegality or irregularity warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari Date: 19th March, 2010 Nn. HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENAKUMARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No:1169 OF 2010 19.03.2010