IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 5717 of 2008 Decided on: 30.07.2010 Anil Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner. : Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate. For the respondents No. 1 to 3 : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondent No. 4 & 5. : None. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : The petitioner has assailed appointment of respondents No. 4 and 5 as Constable Driver. The petitioner has secured 48 marks and respondents No. 4 and 5 secured 64 and 49 marks, respectively. Since, repondents No. 4 and 5 are found suitable by the Selection Committee, this Court will not sit in appeal on the recommendations made by the Selection Committee. At this stage, no relief can be granted in favour of the petitioner. 2. In light of above, the petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge July 30, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?