IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2009 / 28TH ASWINA 1931 CRP.No. 1880 of 2003() -------------------------------- IA. 1561/98 IN OS.256/1998 of MUNSIFF COURT, VAIKOM .................... PETITIONERS 1ST & 2ND DEFENDANT. ----------------------------------------------------- 1. GOPI. S/O.KESAVAN, PATHIL VEETTIL, AKKARAPPADOM KARA, VADAKKE MURI VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK. 2. LEELA, W/O.KESAVAN, PATHIL VEETTIL, AKKARAPADOM KARA, VADAKKE MURI VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK. BY ADV. MR.P.RADHAKRISHNAN MR.MADHU RADHAKRISHNAN MR.K.S.ANIL KUMAR (VAIKOM) 1ST RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF-2ND RESPONDENT/3RD DEFENDANT-3RD RESPONDENT/4TH DEFENDANT-4TH RESPONDENT/5TH DEFENDANT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. JAYARAM, S/O.RAJAN, RESIDING AT AKKARAPADOM LASKHAM VEETTIL, AKKARAPADOM KARA, VADAKKE MURI VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK. 2. SASI, S/O.KESAVAN PATHIL VEETTIL, AKKARAPADOM KARA, VADAKKE MURI VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK. 3. VIJAYAN, S/O.SANKUNNI, RANDU KANDATHIL, AKKARAPADOM KARA, VADAKKE MURI VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK. 4. MANOHARAN, S/O.SANKUNNI, RANDU KANDATHIL, AKKARAPADOM KARA, VADAKKE MURI VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK. R1 BY ADV. MR.JAMES MATHEW KADAVAN. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- C.R.P.NO.1880 OF 2003 () ----------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of October, 2009 O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the revision has become infructuous. Hence, the revision is dismissed as infructuous. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE prp