IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 11TH JULY 2008 / 20TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 25804 of 2007(V) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- V.EBRAHIM, CONVENOR, KELLUR DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, KELLUR POST, 5TH MILE, MANATHAWADY TALUK, WAYANAD. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN SRI.GIREESH KUMAR.G. RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE PANAMARAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PANAMARAM, WAYANAD. 2. PRESIDENT, PANAMARAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PANAMARAM, WAYANAD. 3. BIJU.T. NAIR, PROJECT MANAGER, M/S.HAYISON ESSAR CELLULAR LIMITED, ERNAKULAM NORTH, KOCHI- 682 018. 4. C.MAMMOTTY, CHAKKARA HOUSE, P.O.KELLUR, MANANTHAWADY TALUK, WAYANAD. 5. ABDUL NAZAR, CHAKKARA HOUSE, P.O.KELLUR, MANANTHAWADY TALUK, WAYANAD. 6. ABDULLA, CHAKKARA HOUSE, P.O.KELLUR, MANANTHAWADY TALUK, WAYANAD. ADV. SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY FOR R1 SRI.P.SATHISAN SRI.R.RAMADAS FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.25804/2007 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMTITED BY CHEMBAN MAMMOOTTY DT. 30.7.07. EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE PANAMARAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH DT. 17.8.07. EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DT. 18.8.07. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS EXT.R3(a):- BUILDING PERMIT OBTAINED FROM GRAMA PANCHAYATH DT. 28.5.07. EXT.R3(b):- STRUCTURAL STABILITY CEIRTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE tss KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.25804 of 2007 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner approached this court praying for a direction to respondents 3 to 6 to stop the alleged illegal construction of the mobile communication tower. It is submitted that in view of the decision of this court in Reliance Infocom Ltd. v. Chemmanchery Grama Panchayat, 2006 (4) KLT 695 the petitioner cannot have any grievance. In view of the intervening developments in case the petitioner has still any grievance left, he may approach the first respondent in which case the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent with notice to the petitioner and respondents 3 to 6 and appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken expeditiously. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) ahg. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------- W.P(C).No. 25804 of 2007 ----------------------------------- JUDGMENT 11th July, 2008