1 CAA No.567/09 Mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.567 of 2009 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.467 of 2009 Bank of Baroda Employees Co-op.Hsg.Soc.Ltd... Applicant versus Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai ... Respondent ... Mr. D.S.Sakhalkar a/w Ms.Savina Bangera i/b Anil Mishra for the applicant. Mr.Anil Singh with Ms.K.K.Soraan for BMC respondent CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 22nd November 2010 P.C. 1. In my view, prima facie case for stay is made out. After acquisition of the property, the respondent has already taken possession of the acquired portion. The possession receipt dated 16 April 1991 (Exhibit- D to the appeal memo) shows that possession was taken. The further notice issued on 14 January 2009 (Exhibit H to the appeal memo) is vague. It does not mention about the previous possession receipt. It does not even give appropriate description of the allegedly offending structure. Hence, respondent is restrained from taking action in pursuance of the impugned notice dated 14 January 2009 till the disposal of the appeal. Civil Application is disposed of. (D.G.KARNIK, J)