1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 6 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2862 OF 1998 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10 OF 2010 Samata Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha, & Ors. .. Appellants. vs. Janrao Mahtarba Bhikaji & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar for the appellants. Mr. R.M. Patane, AGP., for Respondent/State. Mr. Mihir Desai for respondent no.1. CORAM : J. N. PATEL, ACTING C.J. & B.R. GAVAI, JJ. DATE : 15TH JANUARY, 2010 P.C. : By the present appeal the appellants challenge the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court 18.10.2007 vide which the petition filed by the resondent no. 1 herein came to 2 be allowed. 2. The respondent no. 1 herein being aggrieved by his termination approached the learned School Tribunal. The learned School Tribunal has allowed the appeal by granting reinstatement but without back wages. Being aggrieved by non-grant of back wages, the respondent no. 1 herein preferred a writ petition which came to be allowed. 3. A perusal of the order passed by the learned Single Judge shows that though an interim relief was granted by the School Tribunal on 18.12.1995 the present appellants had not permitted the respondent no.1 herein to continue in service. In this factual background, the learned Single Judge has found that the writ petitioner was entitled to back wages at least from the date on which the interim order was passed by the learned School Tribunal and as such has granted back wages. 4. We do not find any error or illegality in the order passed by the learned Single Judge. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. 3 5. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, the civil application does not survive. The same also stands dismissed. ( J. N. PATEL, ACTING C. J.) ( B.R. GAVAI, J.)