IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40983 of 2010 AJAY SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR WITH Cr.Misc.No. 41866 of 2010 BHIM SHARMA VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5 26.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Ransom alleged was demanded that was to be paid and place was located at Jehanabad in west to Ambedkar Chowk, from there both the petitioners were apprehended on Motorcycle. Submission is that money is not recovered from possession of petitioner Ajay Sharma and he had gone there for realisatioin of Rs. 1100/- for irrigating the field of Bhim Sharma. Occasion to realize the money near Ambedkar Chowk at Jehanabad is not believable when the case of Bhim Sharma is that money recovered from him was for supply of labourer to the contractor contradicts each other, the nature of the offence does not justify bail to the petitioners even considering their remaining in custody since 2.9.2010 and 3.9.2010. 2 Hence, prayer for bail on behalf of petitioners is rejected. However, trial is directed to be expedited. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)