1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5248/2003 (Neelam Kumari vs. State of Rajasthan & Four Ors.) Date of Order :: 25.04.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.K.R. Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr.V.K. Mathur, for U.O.I. Mr.B.L. Bhati, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is claiming compensation against the post office for not delivering his application form to the Education Department which is sent by her for the purpose of recruitment. The disputed question of fact with regard to fixing the responsibility against a particular person is involve in this petition, therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition while exercising power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, the petitioner is at liberty to seek any remedy provided under the law. It is also made clear that at the time of seeking such remedy the question of limitation will not come in her way. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS),J. A.K. Chouhan/-