hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICUATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.18 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 21 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 23 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 24 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 26 OF 2010 IN PIL NO.259 OF 2009. -----------------------------l--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda l of Coram, appearances, Court’s l Orders or directions and l Registrar’s orders. l Court’s or Judges’ Order --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Mr. Uday Warunjikar with Mr. Nitesh Bhutekar and Mr.Rahul More for the petitioners. Mr. R.M. Kadam, Advocate General, with Mr.S.R.Nargolkar, Asst. Govt. Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr.S.R.Ganbavale for respondent No.3. Mr.Subodh Dharmadhikari, Senior Advocate, with Mr.S.Garud i/b. Khaitan & Jayakar for the applicants in C.A. Nos.18/2010 to 21/2010 & 25/2010. Mr.V.R.Dhond i/b. Mr.Aditya Mithe for the applicants in C.A.No. 22/2010. Mr.P.S.Dani i/b. Mr.Nikhil Chaudhary for the applicants in C.A.No. 24/2010. CORAM : F. I. REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : MARCH 10, 2010 P.C. The matter was on board to consider Civil Application No. 19/2000 taken out by 12 applicants to be added as parties and for vacating the order dated 6th January, 2010 and for vacating the interim relief. Considering the controversy, we had asked the learned counsel appearing for the parties whether the matter could be heard finally. All counsel present agreed that hearing the interim applications itself would take some time. The parties agreed for final hearing of the petition. The application for intervention allowed. The interveners are permitted to address the Court. (J.H. BHATIA,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)