IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 10548 of 2001 Between: Tenali Fishermen Cooperative Rep By Its President Dasari Muralli Mohan Rao R/o Tenali. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Tenali Municipality Rep By Its Commissioner Tenali. 2 Station House Officer 2 Town PS, Tenali. 3 Dy. Supdt. of Police Tenali. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a Writ order or order more especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent-2 in not giving protection to the petitioner society herein in implementing the orders in IA No.2241/2000 in OS No.364/2000 dt.25.4.2001 on the file of the principal Junior Civil Judge, Tenali as illegal, arbitrary capricious and violation of principles of natural justice and consquently direct the respondent-2 to give protection to the society by restricting the 1st Respondent in any way in erferring with the peaceful possession and enjoyment and catching of fish by the petitioner society in Ithanagar Cheruvu Ithanagar Tenali in implementing the order passed in IA No.2241/2000 in OS No.364/2000 dt.25.4.2001 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tenali and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: MR.E.SAMBASIVA PRATAP Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3: G.P. FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: None appears. The matter relates to fishing rights of the petitioner- Society during the lease period of three years said to have been granted in 2000-01 and that there was an injunction in favour of the petitioner-society by the lower Court directing the first respondent-municipality to lease out the disputed tanks to the petitioner-society, if there are no other societies entitling to take the lease hold rights. In view of the lapse of time, I am of the opinion that the cause of this writ petition does not survive and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:09.04.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RAGHU}