1 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER 1. S.B.CIVIL MISC. APEAL NO.1913/2003. Union of India & Another. VERSUS Satya Narain Sharma. 2. S.B.CIVIL MISC. APEAL NO.1969/2003. Union of India & Another. VERSUS Satya Narain Sharma. 21.04.2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mrs.Anjoo Shukla, for the appellants. Mr.R.K.Mathur, for the respondent. ***** Heard learned counsel for the parties. In these two appeals the appellants have challenged the award passed by the Arbitrator in both the cases on a common ground that the learned District Judge had no jurisdiction to appoint the Arbitrator. The learned District Judge after considering the facts of the case found that it was not in dispute that the appellants had challenged the order of appointment of the Arbitrator in the writ petition before this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India on the ground that under the provisions of the Act of 1995, the District Judge has no jurisdiction to appoint the Arbitrator. The learned Single Judge of this court dismissed the writ petition and the Division Bench also dismissed the appeal against the decision of the learned Single Judge. The learned District 2 Judge taking into account the above fact has dismissed the said objection. I am of the view that in view of the earlier judgment, inter party on this question, given by this court rejecting the same, sitting singly this court cannot re-examine the aforesaid contention which has been rejected by the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench of this Court. Thus, both the appeals fail and the stay applications also stand dismissed. The applications dated 18.05.2004 and 17.03.2005 also stand disposed of. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.