FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1477 OF 2011 ( Maharashtra State Electircty Distribution Co. Ltd. Vs. Pralhad Narayan Sonwane & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Godsay S.M., Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Patil S.S., Advocate for respondent No. 1. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 1st March, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Shri. Godsay states that in accordance with the Work of License Rules 2006, the petitioner has already approached to District Magistrate and hence, the petition should be kept pending till the District Magistrate passes further appropriate orders. 2. I have heard Advocate Shri. Patil, who appears for respondent No. 1/original plaintiff. 3. The District Magistrate is duty bound to pass orders at the earliest and the petitioner need not be kept pending for that purpose. 4. As District Magistrate is not party before this Court no direction as such is being issued to him, but with the expectation that the proceedings will be decided as early as possible and in any case within eight weeks from today, Writ petition is disposed of. [ B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. ] ssc/wp1477.11