IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 6TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 15TH KARTHIKA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1232 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.22121/2009 Dated 27/08/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. ABDUL RAZAK, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.IBRAHIM, OLIYIL HOUSE, THRIKKAKARA P.O., KIZHAKKEKARA ROAD, COCHIN-682 021. 2. A.H.RASHEED, S/O.HASSAN, AGED 52 YEARS, ARAKKAPARAMBIL KUZHIVALIPADI, VYSALIPADI ROAD, EDATHALA P.O., ALUVA-683 561. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM, SENIOR ADVOCATE SMT.C.K.SHERIN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- K.M.THOMAS, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.MATHAI, SECRETARY, THRIKKAKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT THRIKKAKARA, KAKKANAD, RESIDING AT OTTAKKAL PUTHENPURAYIL, PERUMBADAVOM P.O., ELANJI DESOM, ELANJI VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- Cont. Case(C).No.1232 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioners are parties to Annexure VI judgment, whereby, all the matters dealt with as per that judgment and the parties thereto stood relegated to the Ombudsman for Local Self Government Institutions. Following that, the learned Ombudsman has taken different steps and has also issued orders. Now, the plea of the petitioners is that even violating the direction of the learned Ombudsman, the panchayat has put certain other persons in possession. This is a matter which the petitioners can raise before the learned Ombudsman. It does not result in a situation where this Court should initiate action under the Contempt of Courts Act. This case is, hence, closed without prejudice to the petitioners seeking relief from the learned Ombudsman. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.11/11.