IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1362 of 2007 RAM IQBAL SINGH, S/O LATE KAPILDEO SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-GOTPA, P.O.-GOTPA, P.S.-AGRER, DISTRICT- ROHTAS. ………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. UNION OF INDIA. 2. MR. A.S. TRIPURE, THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 3. COL. R.K. RANA, THE MILITARY SECRETARY, ARMY HEAD QUARTER, CARE OF 56 ARMY POST OFFICE, WITHIN THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. 4. COL. N.S. CHOUHAN, THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, RECORDS OFFICE, SECUNDERABAD (A.P.)-500021. 5. BRIG. V.K. MOHAN, THE SENIOR RECORD OFFICER, ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING RECORDS OFFICE, SECUNDERABAD (A.P.)-500021. 6. COL. DINESH LOKHANDEY, OFFICER COMMANDING, 6003 (I) ARMED WORKSHOP, C/O 56 A.P.O. 7. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 8. SRI M.M. JHA, THE SECRETARY, EDUCATION (SECONDARY, PRIMARY AND ADULT EDUCATION) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 9. SRI BASANT KUMAR, THE SECRETARY, BIHAR SANSKRIT SHIKSHA BOARD, PATNA. ………………OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 4 20.05.2009 From the show cause filed in the case, it appears that the orders have been passed by the concerned authorities in compliance to the directions of this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner challenges the correctness of the said order. Since that involves consideration of the order on the merits, the same can not be gone into in a contempt proceeding. The petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the said order in an appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. - 2 - So far as contempt application is concerned, the same is dismissed. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)