IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14234 of 2011 Ajit Ram, S/O Ram Bilash Ram, R/O Vill.- Rajajan, P..S- Mohiuddinnagar, Dsitt.- Samastipur. . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Deputy Development Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, Samastipur. 3. The Block Development Officer, Mohiuddinnagar, Samastipur. . . . . . Respondents. ----------- 2/ 02.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is a P.D.S. Dealer under Mohiuddinnagar Block in the district of Samastipur. The petitioner was allotted certain rice under SGRY Scheme and Food for Work Scheme. The petitioner disputes the quantity of rice and the quantity for which necessary permits have been issued. According to the petitioner, the remaining rice is only 22.25 quintals and according to the respondents the remaining rice is 284.52 quintals, as contained in notice dated 06.08.2011 (Annexure-1). This Court for the present is not going into the dispute regarding the correctness of either the petitioner’s version or the version of the respondents. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct that no coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner, if he deposits 30% of 22.25 quintals of rice or the value of rice at the rate of Rs.10.00 per Kg. within six weeks from today. The petitioner would file a representation in respect of his case before the authority concerned within six weeks, who would dispose of the same within a further period of 10 weeks. It is for the authority to decide that how much quantity 2 of rice was allotted to the petitioner and how much quantity of rice has remained undistributed with him. This application stands disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)