IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43122 of 2008 TUNNI SINGH @ SUJIT KUMAR SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21.11.2008 Heard Learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under sections 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. From perusal of the F.I.R., it is apparent that the case was divided into two parts. The petitioner has been named by co-accused apprehended along with two kidnapped victims. The defence is that the petitioner has been acquitted in the trial for kidnapping. The Court has perused the order of acquittal including the deposition of the two victims. The Court refrains from any observations. The present is not a fit case for grant of privilege of anticipatory. The application is dismissed. The aspect of acquittal in the kidnapping case is a matter to be more appropriately considered in an application for regular bail without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. pkj (Navin Sinha, J)