HON’BLE SHRI G.S.SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.258 OF 2007 Between: Y.Jyothi . . .Appellant AND C.Rami Reddy and others . . .Respondents :: JUDGMENT :: Counsel for the appellant : Shri K.Srinivas Counsel for the respondent Nos.2 to 4: Government Pleader for Civil Supplies 26th March, 2007 PER G.S.SINGHVI, CJ This appeal is directed against order dated 21.12.2006 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.25570 of 2006 whereby he directed Joint Collector, Anantapur to decide the appeal preferred by the writ petitioner (respondent No.1 herein) against suspension of his authorization as fair price shop dealer with a further direction that interim order dated 8-12-2006 passed earlier shall continue. Shri K. Srinivas, learned counsel for the appellant argued that during the pendency of the appeal preferred by respondent No.1, the learned Single Judge could not have stayed the suspension of respondent No.1 and thereby allowed him to work as fair price shop dealer. Learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies stated that the appeal preferred by respondent No.1 is scheduled to be taken up by the Joint Collector on 31.03.2007 and that the appeal will be finally disposed of on or before 07.04.2007. In view of the statement of the learned Government Pleader, we do not consider it necessary to adjudicate the plea raised by the appellant on merits and dispose of the appeal with the direction that if the appellant feels aggrieved by the final order of the Joint Collector, then she shall be free to avail appropriate legal remedy. As a sequel to disposal of the main appeal as infructuous, W.A.M.P.No.483 of 2007 filed by the appellant for interim relief is also disposed of as infructuous. G.S.SINGHVI, CJ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 26.03.2007 kvni