- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.260 OF 2005 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.150 OF 2002 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1095 OF 1994 Shri.Gorakha Narayan Shelke ..Applicant Vs. M/s.C.R.T.Manufacturing Ind.Ltd., ..Respondents ... Mr.Neel Helekar for Applicant Mr.A.D.Patwardhan for Respondent ... CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 13,2005 DATE : DECEMBER 13,2005 DATE : DECEMBER 13,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and Respondent. After some arguments, the learned counsel for the Respondent-employer states that Applicant could not be paid full wages in view of the settlement arrived at between the employer and employee as the Settlement indicates that the payment of wages would be strictly on the basis of productivity and also that the Applicant has to ensure 100% output and efficiency in five skills. - 2 - The learned counsel for the Respondent-employer states that from 19.12.2005 onwards, the Applicant will be provided with adequate training so as to enable him to achieve 100% output efficiency in five skills to pay wages at par with others. The learned counsel for the Respondent-employer also assures that every month the Applicant will be informed of the efficiency percentage so as to enable the Applicant to achieve 100% efficiency at the earliest. The learned Counsel for the Applicant assures that the Applicant will acquire the said efficiency within 90 days from 19.12.2005 on which date, the training will start. 2. Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]