IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 5358 of 2011. Decided on: 5th August, 2011. Surinder Kumar …Petitioner. Vs. The Secretary (IPH) and others. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner : Ms.Suman Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr.Ankush Dass Sood, Addl.A.G. & Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: (i) Writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued to respondent No.2 and respondent No.4 to regularize the service of the petitioner as Fitter since 1996. (ii) The respondents may be directed to release all the monetary benefits to the petitioner since the date of his regularization. 2. It is seen that the petitioner has submitted representation annexure P-5 before the Engineer-in-Chief. There will be a direction to the second respondent/competent authority to look into Annexure P-5 and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law. In case the petitioner requests for an opportunity of hearing, the same shall also be granted. Needful, as above, shall be done within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. 2 2. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice August 5, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tilak) Judge.