IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 4939 of 2008. Decided on: 10.11.2010. __________________________________________________________ Vijay Atri. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. None for respondent No.4. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. P.M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General fairly submits that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment dated 15.9.2010 rendered by this Court in Amarjit Kaur versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, CWP(T) No.5156 of 2008. 2. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner strictly as per the principles laid down by this Court in the judgment cited hereinabove, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - judgment. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 10, 2010. (sck).