IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI THURSDAY, THE 29TH OCTOBER 2009 / 7TH KARTHIKA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 38 of 2003(F) ---------------------------- OP.68/2001 of FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM .................... PETITIONER: APPELLANT/PETITIONER ----------------------------------- PARAMBAN NARAYANAN, S/O.LATE ITTAYATHAN, AGED 31 YEARS, THEKKUMPURATH VEEDU, PALLIKKAL AMSOM, TIRURANGADI TALUK, PALLIKKAL P.O. BY ADV. SRI.P.S.SREEDHARAN PILLAI RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT ------------------------- RAJANI, D/O.POOKKODAN UNNIKUTTY, AGED 21 YEARS, PALAPARAMBIL VEEDU, VILAYIL PARAPPUR, P.O.VILAYIL, ERNAD TALUK. THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C. HARI RANI,JJ ============================== C.M.application No. 317 of 2003 in Mat Appeal No. 38 OF 2003 ============================ DATED THIS THE 29th DAY OF October 2009 ORDER/JUDGMENT Basant,J. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the mater has been settled between the parties and a memo has been filed by him. In these circumstances, the appellant/petitioner does not want to press the application for condonation of delay or the appeal. Request accepted. The application for condonation of delay is dismissed as not pressed. Consequently, the appeal shall also stands rejected as barred by limitation. R. BASANT, JUDGE M.C. HARI RANI,JUDGE ks. WPC. 2