<^> IN THE HIGH CQURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) W.P. No?^35/2001 PETITIONERS ;. ^ .../y ^^y'. ^'&' x-y ^ ^<" ^ SMT. MALA DUBEY, D/o. LATE SHRI DANI RAM SHARMA, W/o. Dr. T.N. DUBEY SMT. HEM KUMARI SHARMA, W/o. LATE SHRI DANI RAM SHARMA, BOTH1AND2 R/o.VILLAGE- ADBHAR, TAH. - SAKTI, DISTT. - JANJGIR - CHAMPA (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. PRABHAT S/o. NOT KNOWN 2. CHANDRABHAN S/o. NOT KNOWN 3. GOVIND S/o.NOT KNOWN 4. BHAGAWAT S/o. NOT KNOWN 5. CHEDI DUBEY S/o. NOT KNOWN 6. RATNA D/o.NOT KNOWN 7. GUDDA S/o. NOT KNOWN 8. NANKI S/o. NOT KNOWN 9. LALA MASTER S/o. NOT KNOWN RESPONDENT No. 1 TO 9ARE R/o.VILLAGE - ADABHAR, TAH. - SAKTI, DISTT. JANJGIR-CHAMPA (C.G.) Q> 10.' STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH COLLECTORJANJGIR -CHAMPA. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^SA&^^ ..^"i HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILA8PUR WRFT PETmON No. 2539 of2001 PETITIONER : Smt. Mala Dubey & another. VERSU8 RESPONDENTS : Prabhat & Others. :S2IT TmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB:Hon'bleShnSatishK.Affiuhotn,J, Present: Shri Raiesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer fbr the State/respondeirt No. 10. I ORDER fORAL) (Passed on 27th day of July, 2010) A>- ' 1. Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner, on instmctions, seeks pemiission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to appropriate fomm that may be available to the petitioner, under the provisions oflaw. 2. Leamed counsel apptearing for other side has no objection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. . ^ 4. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed' as withdrawn with the afbrestated liberty, ifso advised. I Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit