1 Cri-A-362-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 362 OF 2011 Shri Ravi Rajan @ R.R.Pandayan ... Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents Mr. S.J.Shelke,Advocate, for the applicant Mr.D.R.More, APP, for the respondent No.1 - State. Mr. Rajesh Shirke, Advocate, for the respondent No.2. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 29th April, 2011. P.C. 1. Mentioned, not on board. Taken on board at the request of the parties. 2. The complaint, being Misc. Application No.151/Misc/2011, was registered in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, 52nd Court, Kurla, Mumbai, on the complaint lodged by respondent No.2 - Sudhakar Shetty and the learned Magistrate has directed investigation under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. The petitioner/accused and the respondent No.2/complainant have filed the consent terms marked "X" for identification to show that they have amicably settled all the disputes and, therefore, the proceedings in the said case may be quashed. 2 Cri-A-362-11.sxw 3. In view of the above consent terms, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) and the above referred case is hereby quashed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)