1 406 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.406 OF 2010 Smt.Malini Shivaji Hotkar .. Applicant Vs. Shri Parmeshwar Gundiba Kotakdhond & ors ..Respondents Mr.B.G.Saraf with Mr.Sunil Kumar Rathod for Applicant None for State-Respondent Ms.Malini Shivaji Hotkar present in person CORAM : N.D.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : January 18, 2011 P.C. 1. This is a Revision application filed by the applicant who is wife of the complainant and mother of the victim (deceased). It is the State's prosecution and Sessions case No.146 of 2007 has been registered against the accused and they are being tried for the offences under sections. 306, 34 of IPC. The evidence is part heard. The main grievance of the applicant is that certain documents during the course of the recording of evidence has not been considered and taken on record out of the bunch before the trial court with the permission of the prosecution. In short, the present Revision application is filed against the 2 406 order of rejection of certain documents which is impugned at page nos. 22 to 27. The applicant is present in person and is represented by her counsel Mr.Sunil Kumar Rathod. 2. Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar Rathod. None appeared for the State. After hearing the submissions of the learned counsel of the applicant for sometime, he agreed that rejection of the order passed in respect of some of the documents is an interlocutory order dated 6.7.2010 and therefore, the present Revision Application on instructions is allowed to be withdrawn. 3. The applicant is a widow of the complainant and is willing to cooperate with the trial and to assist the prosecution for its expeditious disposal. In that view of the matter Revision Application is allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs. N.D.DESHPANDE, J