IN T-HE KON'BLE MI6H COURT OF CHHATTrSGARH AT BILASPUR REVIEW PETITtON N0. W OF 2011 REVIEW PETITION UNbEROROER 47 RULE l.^O&E OF CIVIL PROCE&URE. 1908 Petitioner Applicant/Husband ^ Chaman Singh Rajput, S/o Yavan Singh Rajput, dged about 27 years, Occupation - L.I.C. Agent, R/o Ramnagar', Supela, Bhilai, Tahsil and District Durg (C.6.) Respondent Non- Applicant/Wife ^Smt. Shraddha © Lokeshwari Rajput W/o Shri Chaman Singh Rajput, aged about 26 years, Occupation - Teacher, posted at Village Bidduri, Block Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon (C.S.) R/o Village Kosmi, Tahsil Daundilohara, District Durg (C.6.) COURT FEE AFFIXEDRS. 15/- ^ Chaman Sinqh Rajpu' Smt. Shraddha @ Lokeshwari Raiput ,A" 1. By way of instant review petition the petitioner has prayed for review of the judgment dated 29.11.2011 passed by this Court in F.A. (M) No.45/2011. 2. It is weil settted principles of law that the mistake or error apparent signifies anerror which is evident ,oer se from the record of the case and does not require detailed examination, scrutiny and elycidation either of the facts or the legal position. If an error is not self-evident and detection thereof requires long debate ond process of reasoning, it cannot be treated as an error flpparent on the face of the record for the purpose of Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. 3. Perused the grounds taken by the applicant in the petition for review. 4. The judgment under review has been passed ofter hear'ing both the parties at iength and in view of the above settled position of law, no good ground for review is available to the applicont against the impugned review petition is without any substance, the ) is hereby dismissed. —— - Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge Accordingly, the same deserves-to be Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Judge Roshan/-