1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. 1366/2008 Kushab Ramchandra Parelwar vs. State of Maharashtra ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : A.P.LAVANDE, J DATE : 05.05.2008 Heard Mr. R.S.Kurekar, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the applicant has taken exception to the order dated 15.3.2008 passed by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal Case No. 7/95 by which the application for discharge of the applicant has been rejected by the trial Court. 3. Mr. Mandpe, learned A.P.P. brought to my notice that the applicant had earlier filed an application for discharge before the trial court and against the rejection of the application the applicant had filed Criminal Revision Application No. 216/04 which was also dismissed by this court by order dated 6.10.2006. According to Mr. Mandpe, the applicant in the present application has not disclosed about the earlier applications filed before the trial court and the orders passed thereon. 4. Mr. Kurekar, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant had not given instructions to him 2` regarding the earlier orders passed by the trial court as well as by this court. 5. The present application is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the application, the applicant has not disclosed that he had filed similar application before the trial court and as against the rejection of the application he has filed revision in this court which was also dismissed. The litigant who approaches this court invoking Section 482 of the code of Criminal Procedure must disclose the earlier orders passed in the same subject matter. Having not disclosed this fact the applicant is guilty of suppression of facts. Moreover, I do not find any case on merits to interfere at this stage . 6. For the reasons stated above, the application is dismissed with costs of Rs. 1500/- in favour of the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur to be paid by the applicant within a period of six weeks. Judge patle 3`