(Spl.-H.C.A.S.,C.D.,78-e) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 248 OF 2003 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 259 PF 2003 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Note, Office Memoranda of Quorum, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s Orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri J. F. Mello, advocate for the applicants. Shri J. Godinho, advocate for the respondents. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE : 23rd January, 2004 P.C.: This application has been filed to stay the operation of the Judgment and Decree of the IInd Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Margao in Special Civil Suit No.341/92/II. The Appeal having been admitted, the applicants now seek stay of the operation of the impugned order. Before the Appellate Court, the respondents had undertaken not to cut the five coconut trees which were in dispute and that they would not plant any new seeds in the disputed portion, nor would they make any construction - 2 - in the disputed portion of the property. This undertaking was given on 24th April, 2001, and was in operation till the appeal was returned on 29th March, 2003. Shri Godinho, learned advocate for the respondents states that the respondents will not take any steps to cut the five coconut trees which are in dispute and status quo as of today will remain. In view of the statement made by Shri Godinho, which is accepted, the Miscellaneous Civil Application is disposed of. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. mc.