1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU WP(MD)No.1766 of 2011 and MP(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 C.Rajendran :Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Director of School Examination, Chepauk, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Pudukkottai. 3.The Block Development Officer, Thiruvarankulam Panchayat Union, Thiruvarankulam, Pudukkottai District. 4.The Panchayat President, Kuppakudi Panchayat, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. :Respondents Prayer:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pursuant to the impugned order of the 3rd respondent dated 14.06.2005 in Na.Ka.No.5256/97/D3 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Arockiasamy For Respondents : Mr.TS.Md.Mohideen, AGP for R1 and R2 ORDER The petitioner is a Panchayat Assistant in Kuppakudi Panchayat, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukottai District. In this Writ petition, the petitioner has come forward to challenge an order of suspension dated 14.06.2005. The suspension order was made on the ground that the 2nd respondent / District Collector has given a direction to suspend the petitioner as he has submitted bogus educational certificate. 2.Notice of motion was ordered on 15.02.2011. Even though the petitioner sought for an interim order, no interim order has been granted. 3.The third respondent / Block Development Officer has filed a counter affidavit dated 11.03.2011 together with a supporting documents relating to the bogus certificate produced by the petitioner. In paragraph No.8 of the counter affidavit, it was averred as follows: "8. .....it is submitted that prior to 14.11.1980, the petitioner had worked as ex village officer. Consequent on the abolition of the post Village Officer, the petitioner was appointed as Panchayat Assistant, Kuppakudi as per G.L.No.962 Panchayat https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Development (E7) Department dated 28.11.1990 and joined duty on 01.01.1991. At the time of joining duty as Panchayat Assistant, the educational qualification of the petitioner was (S.S.L.C.failed). The petitioner preferred application to the District Collector that he has passed S.S.L.C.during March 1996 and requested appointment as Village Administrative Officer. The original Educational Qualification certificate was sent to the first respondent for verification. The first respondent in his Rc.No.31510/V2-2/2004 dated 10.03.2005 has intimated that the S.S.L.C.Pass certificate produced by the petitioner in bogus one. Since the petitioner had produced bogus certificate and tried to cheat the Government, the 2nd respondent issued direction in Rc.No.V1/5887/05 dated 03.05.2005 to initiate disciplinary action against the petitioner and as well as the Police complaint. The third respondent in his Rc.No.T3/5256/97 dated 06.05.2005 issued show cause notice to the petitioner calling for his explanation. The petitioner has not any reply to the show cause notice, issued by the third respondent. Hence, the petitioner was placed under suspension by the 3rd respondent in his Rc.No.5256/97-T3 dated 14.06.2005." 4.In the light of the above, there is no case made out to interfere with the order of suspension. Hence, the Writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected M.Ps.are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The Director of School Examination, Chepauk, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Pudukkottai. 3.The Block Development Officer, Thiruvarankulam Panchayat Union, Thiruvarankulam, Pudukkottai District. 4.The Panchayat President, Kuppakudi Panchayat, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. +1CC to The Special Government Pleader. SR.No.40373. +1CC to Mr.Pala.Ramasamy, Advocate. SR.No.40092. Nbj RP/07.12.2011/2P/7C. W.P.(MD)No.1766 of 2011 16.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/