:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4890 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 4890 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO. 4890 OF 2007 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 2264 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 2264 OF 2007 APPEAL NO. 2264 OF 2007 .......................................................... Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearance, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and orders Registrar’s orders .......................................................... Mr. Madhav Jamdar for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 01ST OCTOBER, 2007 : 01ST OCTOBER, 2007 : 01ST OCTOBER, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . Considering the averments made and specifically in view of the order passed by this Court whereby the action initiated was quashed and set aside referring to the land in question, in the present matter also, the suit is decreed partly. The Trial Court has, in fact, granted protection in so far as the part of the land in question. :2: 2. Taking all this into account, pending the decision of the Appeal, parties to maintain status-quo. 3. In view of this, Application is disposed of accordingly. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.)