IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 28TH JUNE 2011 / 7TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 17159 of 2011(T) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ LATHA RAMAKRISHNAN, W/O.SAJI KURUP, AGED 35 YEARS, VYSAKH, SREYAS NAGAR, PALACE ROAD, SOUTH CHALAKUDY. BY ADVS. SRI.C.HARIKUMAR, SRI.RAJU RADHAKRISHNAN. RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. RASHTRIYA SANSKRIT SANSTHAN, DEEMED UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, 56-57 INSTITUTIONAL AREA, JANAKPURI, NEW DELHI-110 058. 2. PRINCIPAL, RASHTRIYA SANSKRIT SANSTHAN, DEEMED UNIVERSITY, GURUVAYUR CAMPUS, PURANATTUKARA, THRISSUR-680 551. BY ADV. SRI.N.M.MADHU,SC,RASHTRIYA SANKRIT SD UTY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/06/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.17159/2011 T APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE ORDER OF APPOINTMENT OF THE PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 16/07/2010. P2: COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF TERMINATION DTD. 20/05/2011. P3: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD.27/4/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: R1(A): COPY OF THE INTIMATION DTD. 29/04/2011. R1(B): COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE INTIMATION DTD.29/4/2011. /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.17159 OF 2011-T --------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner who was engaged by the 2nd respondent on contract basis to work as Part Time Teacher is aggrieved by the non-extension of the service till 30th of June, 2011. It is prayed that this Court may direct the 2nd respondent to implement Exhibit P3 communication from the 1st respondent. 2. A statement has been filed on behalf of the 2nd respondent by the Standing Counsel wherein it is pointed out that the Deputy Registrar of the Sansthan upon instructions from the higher authorities issued an order dated 29.4.2011 which would read that the service of the contract/Guest Lecturers appointed for the academic year 2010-11 shall be terminated on 20.5.2011 and Exhibit R1(a) is the copy of the said proceedings. Accordingly it is submitted that the petitioner already stands terminated and that she being a contract appointee, no further right can be claimed by the petitioner for continuance. Evidently, the appointee under a contract cannot bargain for continuance and regularisation. W.P.(C)No.17159/11 -2- 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner then prayed that the respondents may be directed to issue an experience certificate. If an application is duly submitted, the same will be issued by the respondents in terms of the relevant rules without delay. The Writ Petition is dismissed with the above observation. Sd/-(T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn