'-. Singie Bench Smt. Meena Dubey aged about 40 yeare, W/o Shri S.S. Dubey Assistant Teaoher, Govt. IVIiddle School, Torwa, Distt. Bliaspur (C.G.) Vs. ' State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) The Director, Publto Instruct'ion Department, Raipur (C.G.) Disiriot Education Officer, Bilaspur District Biiaspur (C.G.) Shri Ramakant Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri An/ind Dybey, Pane! Lawyer for the State. Indu The question of taw invoived herein as to whether the petitioner is ent'.tted to regular pay scale vv.e.f. the date of initial appointment or frorn the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointiy submit that the facts and question of law involved in the prssent writ petition are the same to that of in W.P.(S) No. 5191 of 2006 (Har Prasad Kurre & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others), vi/hich v/as aliowed vlde order dated 03.10.2006. 3. !n view of the above-state submissions made by iearned counsei for the parties, the writ petition Is aliowed in the same terms. No order as to Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge