IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 29TH JANUARY 2010 / 9TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 2914 of 2010(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MAXIE JOHN,S/O.LATE P.C.JOHN,AGED 5 0 YRS., H.1/1114, 'SKY VIEW BUILDINGS' KUNNUMPURAM, KOCHI-682001. BY ADV. SRI.SAJAN MANNALI RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CORPORATION OF KOCHI, ERNAKULAM, REPT.BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SERETARY, CORPORATION OF KOCHI, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE HEALTH OFFICER, CORPORATION OF KOCHI OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION OF KOCHI,ERNAKULAM. 4. P.N.HARRIS, S/O.LATE NOORDIN, H.NO.6/164,STAR JUNCTION, MATTANCHERRY. KOCHI - 2. MR.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS, SC FOR CORPORATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.2914 of 2010 (L) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 29th day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner submits that building No.1/1107A of Corporation of Cochin belongs to him. According to the petitioner, in respect of the aforesaid building, the 4th respondent is attempting to obtain a licence. It is stated that the 4th respondent is nor a lessee or a tenant and that therefore he is not entitled to obtain the licence or even to make an application in this behalf. 2. The apprehension of the petitioner is that if an application for licence is made by the 4th respondent there is every possibility of considering the said application without issuing notice to him. Pointing out the above, the petitioner made Exts.P4 & P6 representations before the 2nd respondent and seeks a direction in this writ petition for its consideration before any order is passed on the application to be made by the 4th respondent. 3. In the circumstances as pointed out, I see no reason to decline an order for consideration of the representations referred to above. WP(C) No.2914/2010 -2- 4. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 2nd respondent that in the event any application is received from the 4th respondent, before final order is passed on such application, Exts.P4 & P6 representations should also be taken into account, and orders shall be passed only with notice to the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg