1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 11410 of 2011-A Decided on: 27.12.2011 Charan Dass, S/o Sh. Harnama, R/o Pekhubela, Tehsil & Distt. Una, H.P. ....Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India through Secretary (Human Resource Development) Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 2. State of Himachal Pradesh through Collector, Una, Distt. Una, H.P. 3. The Collector-cum-Tehsildar, Una, District Una, H.P. 4. The Principal, Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Pekhubela, Tehsil & Distt. Una, H.P. ....Respondents Civil Writ Petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Himmat Negi, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India, for respondent No. 1. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General for respondents No. 2 & 3. 2 Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayers: “a) To demarcate the land of the petitioner as is requested by him and said request still pending with respondent No. 3. Directions may be given to give demarcation after giving notice to respondents No. 1, 2 & 4; b) Further directions may be issued to respondent No. 3 to submit said demarcation report alonwith his reply for perusal of this Hon'ble Court; c) That respondents No. 1, 2 & 4 may very kindly be directed either to acquire the land of the petitioner in accordance with law as is under the building and premises of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Pekhubela, Tehsil & Distt. Una, H.P., or to vacate the same immediately;” 2. According to the petitioner, the matter is now pending before the third respondent. There will be a direction to the third respondent to take final decision in the matter after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the fourth respondent. The needful action shall be done within a period of two months from the date of production of a copy of this 3 judgment alognwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner before the third respondent. 3. The writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. December 27, 2011 (Justice Dev Darshan Sud), (ms/hl) Judge.