IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO. 971 OF 1991. APPEAL NO. 971 OF 1991. APPEAL NO. 971 OF 1991. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 23rd MARCH, 2006. : 23rd MARCH, 2006. : 23rd MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. None appears for the Appellant. The First Appeal is already dismissed as against Respondent No.3 by order dated 17th January 1995. The report of the Bailiff dated 11th February 1992 shows that the notice on Respondent No.2 is served by affixing with remark "gone out". For long time no steps are taken by the Advocate for the Appellant by supplying postal stamps. As a result the notice to Respondent No.2 remained unserved for such a long time. Respondent No.1 is a formal party. In view of this position, the Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Judge. Judge. Judge.