IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal I Bail Application No.834 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE 1. Deepali Gaeein 2. Naveen Gaeen ……….Applicants (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party ________________________________________________________ Arising out of FIR No.84 of 2010, U/s 304-B IPC & 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, PS Sitarganj, Distt. US Nagar Dated: September 9, 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. MK Ray, Advocate for the applicants and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the applicants argued that applicants are the sister in law (JETHANI) and brother in law (JETH) of the victim Deepmala and they were living separately from the victim and her husband and even no specific role has been assigned to them. Further co-accused Suchita Gaeen and Mukund Gaeen have been granted bail by this Court on 11.8.10 and 12.8.10 respectively and the applicants also deserve bail on the basis of parity. After considering all the facts and circumstances, perusing the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicants deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicants be released on bail on each of their executing personal bonds and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, US Nagar. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) September 9, 2010 Rajeev Dang