IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 3505 of 2010-D. Decided on: 24.10.2011. ___________________________________________ Ram Krishan. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. L.N. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.4. None for respondent No.5. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): It is not in dispute that the final seniority list has been drawn in December, 2010. Once the final seniority list has been drawn, the same is required to be given effect to. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-State to take consequential steps to give effect to the final seniority list drawn in December, 2010, within a period of three months from today. It is made clear that in the eventuality of the final seniority list being given effect to, all the consequential benefits shall be granted to the petitioner. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 24, 2011. (sck).