IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3069 of 2009 1. SHASHI BHUSHAN PANDEY 2. RAM PRAVESH PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.3.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the informant and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the land dispute was there prevailing in between the parties and the petitioner no.1 has been shown one of the accused who caught the deceased. Thereafter firing was shot but when there is several round of firing then no question arises for catching the deceased by anyone while petitioner no.2 has also been shown as one of the accused who shot firing but that did not hit any one. Though prayer for bail is vehemently opposed on behalf of the informant on the point that it was a planned act of accused persons but at the same time enmity is there, chance of false implication is there but without considering the same at this stage, finding the above named two petitioners not assailants of the deceased and their remaining in custody since 26.8.2008 and 29.8.2008 respectively, let them be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. II, Buxar in Dhansoin P.S. case no. 35 of 2008. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI