1 AO 728/10 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 728 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. R.S. Datar for the appelant. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 22ND NOVEMBER 2010 P.C. : 1. The appellant claims to be a co-owner of the property and respondent nos.1 to 4 are the other co-owners. In a suit for declaration regarding ownership, the appellant claimed an injunction restraining the respondents from transferring their share in the property. Assuming the plaintiff’s case to be true, on the plaintiff’s own showing the respondents are co- sharers in the property, as such they cannot be restrained from selling transferring, alienating 2 AO 728/10 or dealing with their share in the suit property. Consequently, the learned trial judge was right in rejecting the application. There is no merit in the appeal which is hereby dismissed. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)