IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 397 OF 2007 FILM MAKERS THROUGH PRESIDENT PROF. MILIND MHADGUT ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. D. P. Bhise, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. G. Bhonsule, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Coram:- R. S. MOHITE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 28th August, 2007 P. C.:- Heard Mr. D. P. Bhise, the learned Counsel on behalf of the Petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, the learned Advocate General has placed in our hands the Orders dated 16-8-2007 reconstituting a "Screening Committee" and a "Finance Committee" in terms of Rule 3(K) and 3(l) of the Goa Scheme of Financial Assistance for Films. The said Orders be placed on record. In view of the said Orders the petition does not survive in terms of prayers (a) and (b) of the petition. The learned Advocate General states that a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- were paid to Respondent No.3 as an award pursuant to the decision of the House(Goa Legislative Assembly) and it has nothing to do with grants given under the said Scheme i.e. the Goa Scheme of Financial Assistance for Films, 2006. We also find that the said award was given to Respondent No.3 pursuant to Resolution dated 26-8-2005 and the Petitioner has approached this Court after two years. In the light of the statement of the learned Advocate General, which we accept, we propose not to interfere with the said award in our extraordinary jurisdiction. Petition rejected. R. S. MOHITE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.