IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.1631 of 2009 ***** Ambo @Ambho @ Amrendra Yadav, son of Late Mathuri Yadav, resident of village- Jagatpur, Police Station-Parbatta (Naugachia), District-Bhagalpur. …. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar …. …. Opposite party ----------- 5. 2.7.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there are certain contradiction, which had emerged during investigation in the various statements which have been made by the witnesses and that is good enough to give the petitioner benefit of grant of bail. Learned A.P.P. states that the petitioner is one of the persons named in the F.I.R., who is supposed to have fired along with other two persons. The postmortem report reflects three bullet injuries which caused death of the victim. The so-called contradictions are too minor in nature to take away focus and the evidence which has come against the petitioner at this stage. Looking at the fact that the petitioner is one of the assailants and an accused in the serious offence of murder of a young person, the petitioner does not deserve any leniency. The petition is dismissed. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)