M c y-s' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.l Petitioners Writ Petition (Sl No. ^^ S Q/2009 //< y / /^y /' A/ ^' }W: ^mlss^ . T^ ~^^, v^^ 1. Smt. Sarita Archana Wilson, W/o Pradeep Wilson, C/o Shri Praveen Raj Robert, aged about 47 years, R/o Master line, Dak Bungalow Ward, Dhamtari, Distt.- Dhamtari, (C.G.) 2. Ku. Nanda Rangari, D/o Shri B. Rangari, Aged about 43 years, R/o Old Pension Bada, Qtr. No. C/12, Raipur, Distt.-Raipur, (C.G.) 3. Smt. Nirmala, W/o Shri Dhananjay Kumar, Aged about 33 years, R/o Qtr. No. 92-A, H.S.C.L., Ruwabandha, P.0.- Civic Centre, Distt.-Durg, (C.G.) 4. Smt. Sadhana Sahu, W/o Shiv Kumar Sahu, Aged about 31 years, Teacher, Post Officer Ward, Ama Talab Road, Dhamtari, Distt.-Dhamtari, (C.G.) /-^ © 5. Smt. Snigdha Sinha, W/o Ajay Sinha, Aged about 30 years, R/o Near Hospital, Kalyan Ashram Road, Jashpur Nagar, Distt.-Jashpur, (C.G.) "\.. Respondents Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Its Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ^' 2. Chhattisgarh Nursing Counsel, Through : Its Registrar, Old Nurses Hostel, Near D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) c^^" 3. Indian Nursing Counsel, Combined Council Buildings, Kotla Road, Temple Lane, NewDelhi- 110002. 4. Registrar, Madhya Pradesh Bhoj Open University, Red Cross Building, Shivaji Nagar, P.B.NO.-87, Bhopal-462011, M.P. w 5. Smt. Rita Sandhya Naik, W/o Shri A.K.Naik, Aged about 40 years, Presently residing at Govt. B.Sc. Nursing College, Tikrapara, Raipur, (C.G.). ^"-•inaid^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THB NATRURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION(S) OR ORDER(S) /-"^ d^^. i HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRJlPETITiONj(SJJsig^80-Of:-2009 PETITIONERS Smt. Sarita Archana Wii^on & Others RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others ^y^t^ ^. h^NN^ (Writ Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitutton of india) Single Bench : Hon*bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Ashok Patii, Advocate for ihe petitioners. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORD£B(QBAy (Passed on this 4th dayof March, 2011) 1< Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that since the respondent No.2 has already communicat^jl to the petitioners to conssder their cases for registratlon, the petitloners do not want to press this petition at this stage, However, If a cause of actJon arises thereafter, the petitioners may be permitted to approach this Court. St is ordered, as prayed for. Accordingly, the writ petition is dfemissed as wfthdrawn with the above-stated observation. , Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Arun