THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19727 of 2009 ORDER: An extent of Acs.2.55 cents of land in Survey No.113 of Parawada Village of Visakhapatnam District was notified for acquisition to establish a Pharma City. Initially, a notification was issued under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioners filed W.P.No.24430 of 2004 complaining that their claims for compensation are not being considered. The writ petition was disposed of on 29.12.2004 with certain directions. It appears that the notification, dated 27.05.2004, lapsed on account of the failure of the respondents to pass the award. A fresh notification was issued on 20.02.2007. This writ petition is filed by the petitioners stating that though they made claims for compensation, there is no response. It appears that there are rival claims between the petitioners on the one hand and respondent Nos. 3 to 6 on the other for compensation. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition and the learned Counsel for respondent Nos.3 to 6. The record discloses that ever since the proceedings were initiated for acquiring the land, the claims were made by various individuals. The petitioners on their part approached this Court by filing W.P.No.24430 of 2004. The writ petition was disposed of directing that the claims of the petitioners shall be considered. At the subsequent stage of proceedings also, the conflict of claims persisted. It is brought to the notice of this Court that an award was passed on 09.09.2009 and the matter was referred to the civil Court under Section 30 of the Act. The compensation is also said to have been deposited in the civil Court on 05.01.2010. Now, it is for the petitioners and respondent Nos. 3 to 6 to substantiate their claims before the civil Court. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioners, respondent Nos.3 to 6 and others, who are interested in the land, to substantiate their claims before the civil Court. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:26.04.2010 kdl