IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 4008 of 2010. Decided on: 15.07.2010. __________________________________________________________ Kulwant Singh. … Petitioner. Versus H.R.T.C. and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. For the Petitioner : Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): This writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “(i) That writ in the nature of certiorari may kindly be issued against the respondents by quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 12.12.2005, Annexure P-3 and the dismissal of the appeal of the petitioner dated 30.10.2007, Annexure P-4. (ii) That writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued by directing the respondents to re-engage the petitioner against the post of TMPA with all consequential benefits. (iii) That the respondents may be directed to decide the appeal of the petitioner with a speaking order and petitioner may be heard personally while deciding his representation/appeal.” 2. Having heard learned counsel on both the sides, we find that the Appellate Authority has not adverted to the contentions taken by the petitioner while passing the order in appeal. Therefore, we set aside - 2 - the appeal-order, Annexure P-4. There will be a direction to the Appellate Authority to pass fresh orders in the matter adverting to all the contentions taken by the petitioner. This shall be done within a period of three weeks on production of copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner. In case the petitioner wants opportunity for hearing, the same shall also be granted. 3. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. July 15, 2010. (sck/awasthi).