Cr.Revision 90 of 2003. 19.4.2010 Present: Mr. G.R.Palsra, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl. AG, with Mr. R.P.Singh, Asstt. AG, for respondent. Heard. In Dalbir Singh v. State of Haryana, (2000) 5 SCC 82, the Supreme Court has categorically held that no benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act can be given to an accused convicted for offences under Sections 279, 304-A and 338 of the Indian Penal Code. This judgment has been subsequently followed by this Court in State of H.P. v. Girdhari Lal, 2007 Cri. L.J. 4347. In these circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of probation under the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act. Bail bonds furnished by the petitioner are forfeited. The learned Sessions Judge, Mandi is directed to execute the sentence imposed on the petitioner. April 19, 2010(PC). (Dev Darshan Sud), J.