IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19707 of 2011 Surendra Prasad Singh S/O Late Bhagawati Pd. Singh R/O Village- P.O.- Punpun, P.S.- Punpun, District- Patna ….. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Settlement Officer, Patna 3. The Assistant Settlement Officer, Danapur 4. Kamata Prasad Singh S/O Late Nand Kumar Singh R/O Village- Jalalpur, P.S.- Danapur, Distt.- Patna 5. Kameshwar Prasad Singh S/O Late Nand Kumar Singh R/O Village- Jalalpur, P.S.- Danapur, Distt.- Patna 6. Tapeshwar Pd. Singh S/O Late Gajraj Pd. R/O Village- Jalalpur, P.S.- Danapur, Distt.- Patna …… Respondents For the Petitioner : Mr. Shankar Kishore Shahi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhashkar Shankar, AC to GP 16 2 22.11.2011 After some argument, in view of the fact that the impugned order has been passed by the concerned Revenue Officer in a revision filed by the petitioner under the provision of Section 108 of the Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) against an order passed under Section 106 of the Act and also in view of the fact that there is a provision of appeal under Section 109A of the Act against any order passed by the Revenue Officer under Section 105 to 108 of the Act (both inclusive), learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ 2 application to prefer statutory appeal before the concerned authority Learned counsel appearing for the State does not have any objection. In above view of the matter, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioner. However, if there is any statutory period of limitation and if the petitioner files appeal along with an application for condonation of delay, the same should be considered by the authority concerned in accordance with law. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)