1 1135.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1135 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.222 OF 2009 Shri Sanjay Chhabu Solse ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.R.S.Kate i/b Mr.Suresh Sabrad for Applicant. Dr.F.R.Shaikh, A.P.P. for State. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATED:- OCTOBER 20, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the Applicant. Considering the fact that the evidence of PW 1 is found to be reliable by the Trial Court and with which finding, prima facie, we are in agreement with, there is evidence to indicate complicity of the Applicant in the commission of alleged offence. The PW 1 is one of the injured eye-witness. 2. In the circumstances, no case for bail is made out. Application is rejected. However, the Office shall process the Appeal under caption 2 1135.10.sxw `convicts in jail’ as per its turn. It will be open to the Applicant to file private paper-book if he intends to get the Appeal processed earlier. (P.D.KODE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)