1 73 cp.98.10 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 98 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders None for the parties. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 12 th December, 2011. P.C. . None appears for the Petitioner. 2 The breach alleged in this petition is of the order dated 25 th August, 2009 passed by this Division Bench of this Court in a writ petition. The relevant part of the said order reads thus: “1. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the opportunity of hearing is not being offered by the Collector. In support of the contention he has filed affidavit of one Smt. Seema Abhijit Shinde, advocate who appeared on behalf of the Petitioner before the Collector. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that as on today the order has not been passed by the Collector. If the order is not passed by the Collector as of now, the 2 73 cp.98.10 Collector shall hear all concerned parties and shall thereafter pass orders on merits and in accordance with law.” 3 There is an order passed by the Collector on 27 th/30 th January, 2010. Going by the averments made in the petition, at highest, the case of the Petitioner is that the said order is illegal and improper. The remedy of the Petitioner is to challenge the said order in accordance with law. As there is substantial compliance made by the Collector with the order of the Division Bench of this Court, no case is made out for initiating action under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Hence, the contempt petition is disposed of. [ A.S.OKA, J ]