1 S.B. Criminal Misc. II Bail Application No.4801/2006 Date : 06.11.2006 HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. Pradeep Shah for the applicant. Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. This is second bail application. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that allegation of demand of dowry appears to be not supported by the statements of the relatives of the deceased. In this connection, he has invited my attention to the statements of father PW 1 Ramprasad and uncle PW3 Raju. Learned counsel has also invited my attention particularly to the cross- examination of above witnesses and submits that the applicant may be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 2 Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case and taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case and the statements of the witnesses recorded in the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that applicant Manoj S/o Ramesh alias Dhuri Lal shall be released on bail in FIR No. 49/2006 P.S. Mahila Thana, Udaipur, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vij