{1} D.B. CW (Parole) No. 8036/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. Civil Writ Petition(Parole) No. 8036/2010 Mohd. Nisaruddin Versus State of Rajasthan. DATE OF ORDER: 09.08.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENA V. GOMBER By Post. Mr. Rajendra Yadav, Government Advocate, for the State. Heard learned Government Advocate. Convict-petitioner has preferred this parole writ petition by post wherein it is contended that he has been convicted vide judgment dated 28.02.2004 by Designated Court, Ajmer under the Provisions of The Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987(hereinafter referred to as 'TADA'). Learned Government Advocate referred a circular of the State Government dated 29.04.2000 written to Director and Inspector General of Prisons, Rajasthan, Jaipur for not taking any action in respect of parole {2} D.B. CW (Parole) No. 8036/2010 applications of the convicts who have been convicted under the provisions of TADA. The said circular was challenged before this Court in the case of Jameel Ahmed Vs State of Rajasthan & Others, reported in 2007 (5) Western Law cases, Page No. 722 and validity of the said circular was upheld by this Court observing that in national interest, the benefit of parole can be denied to prisoners convicted under TADA. In view of above, we are not inclined to allow this parole writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. A copy of this order may be sent to convict-petitioner for information. (MEENA V. GOMBER),J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. Manoj Item No.13.