1 CRA 1068/2010 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 1068 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. S.S. Shah for the applicant. Mr. Girish R. Agarwal for the respondent no.1. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 14TH FEBRUARY 2011 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. In a suit for eviction filed by the respondent no.1 landlord, a decree for eviction has been passed on the ground of bonafide requirement. The decision has been confirmed by the appellate Bench. The respondent no.1 landlord has a family of 6 members and they are living in only one room. As such, the finding of bonafide requirement is an imminently possible finding of fact and requires 2 CRA 1068/2010 no interference. 3. On 11th January 2011 when this matter came up before me, the notice was directed to be issued to the respondents only limited to the extent of time to be granted to the revision applicant for vacating the suit premises. After having heard the counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the requirement of the respondent no.1 is dire, I grant 6 months’ time to the petitioner to vacate the suit premises. Accordingly while dismissing the revision application, the applicant is granted 6 months’ time from today, i.e. upto 13th August 2011, for vacating the suit premises subject to the applicant filing an undertaking of herself and all her family members in this Court in usual format within 4 weeks. In the event, the undertaking is not filed within 4 weeks, the decree can be executed forthwith. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)