IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.8207 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 17.12.2010 Gurcharan Singh Pannu ....Petitioner Versus Harveer Kaur and another ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Navdeep Monga, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. There is no legal infirmity in the impugned order. The prayer of the petitioner for being impleaded as a party in a suit filed by respondent No.1 has been declined. The petitioner has been unable to show any interest in the proceedings. He obviously was in the knowledge of the proceedings as he is son-in-law of one of the contesting parties. Besides, it is a settled proposition of law that the plaintiff is the dominus litus and has every right to choose the person as respondent against whom he wishes to proceed. If the petitioner has any independent cause of action against the plaintiff- respondent, he may file a separate suit, if so advised. No ground to interfere. Dismissed. 17.12.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss