IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27291 of 2009 URMILA DEVI,w/o Sri Jitendra Pandey,R/o village-Beguda,P.S.-Sonhan,Dist.-Kaimur at Bhabhua. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 04-09-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner along with the deceased’s husband and other family members have been alleged for killing the deceased while submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that marriage was near about ten years ago. It was the deceased who insisted her husband for partition and that took place in the family but that was not the end of her grievance, rather she remained quarreling with her husband. Something might have happened and the deceased committed suicide. So, charge sheet has been submitted against the husband for the offence under Section 306 I.P.C. and pending against this petitioner and others. Differences between the two brothers – deceased’s husband and petitioner’s husband are apparent from the FIR lodged by the petitioner’s husband for the act committed by the deceased’s father and others. Above discussed circumstance, in my opinion also, do not justify refusal of petitioner’s anticipatory bail. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in Bhabua (Sonhan) P.S.Case No.241 of 2008, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, 2 Kaimur at Bhabua, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub- section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )