1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 4669/2009. ( Namdeo K. Banbale -: versus :- Dinkar K. Banbale Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 06, 2009. Heard Shri V.S. Kukday, learned Counsel for petitioner / defendant. The Trial Court has permitted plaintiff to amend the plaint to incorporate challenge to registered partition deed dated 16.07.1985. Plaintiff has stated that she got its knowledge lateron. Learned counsel for petitioner states that plaint itself show that she was aware of the partition and that partition is referred in the order of Tahsildar, passed in mutation proceedings. Perusal of impugned order reveals that, the dispute is in relation to registered Will dated 09.12.1987 and it also appears that there was un-registered partition dated 27.05.1982. In the circumstances, reference in plaint is not necessarily to registered partition. Shri Kukday, learned counsel has argued that the respondent/plaintiff is signatory to the registered partition deed. The merits of the challenge cannot be gone into at this 2 stage, and such challenge can be raised by the petitioner at appropriate stage. As such, no case is made out warranting any interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is therefore, dismissed. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.