1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2625 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3668 OF 2006. ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Nitin Sambre, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. Bharti Dangre, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1, 2, 5 and 6. Mr. P.V.Thakre, Advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM : A.H.JOSHI AND R.C.CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : APRIL 17, 2007. 1. Perused application and judgment. 2. We find that following portion appearing at page 29 in paragraph 28 in the judgment be deleted : “(2) A person belonging to a caste or tribe which is notified for that state is entitled to the benefits wholly in that State and not the State where he/ she migrates.” Instead following portion be inserted : “(2) If a caste or tribe is notified as a caste or tribe in both the States, it does not necessarily mean that the migrant is entitled to the rights, privileges and benefits admissible to a member of the Scheduled Caste or tribe of the migrant State.” 3. Date “16.08.1950” in second line in paragraph 15 and fourth line from bottom in paragraph 26 be substituted by “10.08.1950”. 4. In view of above, the Civil Application is disposed of. JUDGE. JUDGE. RR.