1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5661/2008. Manoj Kumar Jaiswal. VERSUS State of Rajasthan & Others. 08.07.2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.S.S.Rathore, for the petitioner. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner had applied for a composite license in respect of vending of liquor. However, the District Excise Officer vide Annexure-3 has only allowed his application in respect of the country liquor. It is contended that the petitioner even submitted a representation and a notice for demand of justice to the Commissioner but no action has been taken whereon. So far as the grievance of the petitioner is concerned, in case the petitioner is aggrieved by any part of the order (Annexure- 3), the petitioner has a right of preferring an appeal before the Commissioner. The petitioner 2 is now at liberty to prefer an appeal. In view of the fact that the petitioner had submitted the representation (Annexure-4) and the notice to the Commissioner (Annexure-5), the petitioner would be entitled to seek condonation of delay in accordance with law in filing the appeal. Subject to the above, this writ petition stands disposed of. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.