IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 1ST FEBRUARY 2011 / 12TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 12724 of 2005(M) --------------------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------------- 1. PRASAD KUMAR M.P, PCK 6344, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 2. ALBY P.M, PCK 6335, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 3. MANOJ KUMAR V.S, PCK 6336, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 4. SHAIJU P.R, PCK 6338, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 5. SAJI.K.KURAIAKOSE, PCK 6339, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 6. ANIL KUMAR P.R, PCK 6340, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 7. VIJAYAKUMAR N.K, PCK 6342, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 8. BRAHMADAS P.M, PCK 6344, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 9. SAJI KUMAR .I, PCK 6345, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 10. SREENIVAS .C.C, PCK 6347, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 11. MANOJ KUMAR .D, PCK 6348, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 12. JOSEPH ANTONY, PCK 6349, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 13. MANOJ .K, PCK 6351, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. W.P.(C). NO.12724/2005-M: 14. BIJUMON .K.M, PCK 6352, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 15. MAMMACHAN K.K, PCK 6353, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 16. REJIMON K.K, PCK 6354, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 17. MANOJ KUMAR C.S, PCK 6355, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 18. PRADEEP KUMAR K.V, PCK 6356, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 19. GOPAKUMAR, PCK 6357, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 20. SUNIL KUMAR P.G, PCK 6359, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 21. DENCY MON JOSEPH, PCK -6360, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. 22. PONNAPPAN P.K, PCK 6361, DISTRICT ARMED RESERVES, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.K.SUNIL. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECERETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOTTAYAM. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. V.T.K. MOHANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.12724/2005-M ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 1st day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous in the light of the Judgments in similar cases wherein the orders were upheld. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE