IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10934 of 2011 DUDHNATH NUT . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 15.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 6.11.2010 in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case No. 88 of 2010 registered under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is named in dacoity case and the informant has claimed to have seen the petitioner while petitioner was standing out side the house of the informant at the time of alleged occurrence. But contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that prior to the alleged occurrence informant had fought Panchayat election against the petitioner and in the said Panchayat election, informant was defeated at the hands of the petitioner and that is the reason of false implication of the petitioner in the alleged occurrence. It is also contended by him that petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent, and more so, nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and 2 circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Chapra in S. Tr. No. 125 of 2011 arising out of above stated Doriganj P.S. Case No. 88 of 2010. Devendra/ ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)