IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 827 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 827 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 827 OF 2009 1. Tatyaso Dada Bhokare, 2. Sagar Tatyaso Bhokare, 3. Santosh Tatyaso Bhokare, 4. Gopal Tatyaso Bhokare, 5. Raghu Dada Bhokare, 6. Annaso Nana Bhokare, 7. Popat Anna Bhokare, 8. Suresh Anna Mangave, 9. Sukumar Parisa Kinikar, 10. Rohit @ Balu Balaso Chandoba, 11. Rajkumar @ Rajendra Balu Narandekar, 12. Amrut Pradeep Patil, 13. Vishal Devappa Magdum ...Applicants (Orig.Accused) vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.A.P. Mundargi, Sr.Counsel i/b. Mr.P.D. Dalvi for the Applicants. Mr.D.P. Adsule, APP for the State. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 856 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 856 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 856 OF 2009 1. Bashir Mashum Fakir, 2. Yakub Mashum Fakir, 3. Shabbir Mashum Fakir, 4. Ashpak Yakub Fakir, 5. Imityaj Maulla Mujawar, 6. Manullasha Mohomad Fakir, 7. Mujamil Shabbir Fakir, 8. Sameer alias Hasan Jaffarsha Fakir, 9. Akbar Maqbul Fakir. ...Applicants vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Kedar J. Patil for the Applicants. Mr.S.R. Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 25, 2009 DATED : FEBRUARY 25, 2009 DATED : FEBRUARY 25, 2009 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Heard Counsel for the applicants. 2. These are two applications wherein two cross-complaints have been filed, one by the applicants in Criminal Application No.827/2009 and other by the applicants in Criminal Application No.856/009. In both complaints, allegations have been made against each other for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149 read with 326 of the IPC. 3. Counsel for the applicants in both the case submits that the parties have now settled the disputes among themselves. It is submitted that therefore, the both the applications may be allowed and the applicants may be released on bail. 4. Taking into consideration the fact that two cross-complaints have been filed and that there was sudden fight between the two groups, continued detention of the applicants in both the applications, in my view, - 3 - is not necessary. 5. Both the applications are allowed. The applicants in both these applications be released on bail in the sum of Rs.5000/- each with one or two sureties in the like amount for the aforesaid offence registered vide, C.R.No.9/2009 against the applicants in Criminal Application No.827/2009 and C.R.No.8/2009 against the applicants in Criminal Application No.856/2009, at Jaysingpur Police Station, Kolhapur. They shall report to the concerned police station as and when called. Consent Terms are taken on record. 6. The applications are disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)