0510crn2609.09.odt 1/3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2609 OF 2009 IN REVISION APPLICATION NO. - OF 2008 CHANDRASHEKHAR M. GHODMARE VS. NANDKISHOR V. RAGIT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. AR Patil, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. SA Radke, Adv. with Mr. RS Nagpur, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM:- R. Y. GANOO, J. DATED :- 05TH OCT., 2009. 1. There is delay of about 205 days in filing the revision application. The application, if read, goes to indicate that the applicant was not vigilant with reference to the actual fact of filing the revision for substantially long time and it is only when the warrant was issued by the trial Court for arrest, the applicant realised that the revision has not been filed and hence he filed the revision application belatedly. In my view the delay can be condoned by putting the applicant to terms as regards payment of costs and in my view, costs of Rs. 5,000/- (rupees five thousand only) would meet the 0510crn2609.09.odt 2/3 ends of justice. 2. Upon depositing in this Court a sum of Rs. 5,000/- by way of costs on or before 09/11/2009, the delay in filing the revision application shall stand condoned. If the costs of Rs. 5,000/- are deposited in this Court on or before 09/11/2009, the delay shall stand condoned and office to number the revision application and put it for admission. If the costs are so deposited, the same be paid over to the respondent. 3. If the costs are not deposited, the application for condonation of delay shall stand dismissed without further orders from the Court. 4. Learned Advocate for the applicant states that the applicant has filed separate application for bail as he has already surrendered. 5. Office to call for the said application and the learned Advocate mention it for appropriate orders. JUDGE 0510crn2609.09.odt 3/3 wwl