IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 12TH JUNE 2009 / 22ND JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 15595 of 2009(T) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- I.K. SHEKARAN, ETHIKKAD HOUSE, LAW COLLEGE ROAD, THRISSUR-03. BY ADV. MR.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THRISSUR CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, THRISSUR CORPORATION, 3. TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, THRISSUR CORPORATION. 4. MARY THOMAS, KULANGARA HOUSE, AYANTHOLE, THRISSUR. R1 -R3 BY ADVS. K.B.MOHANDAS,SC,THRISSUR CORPORATION R1- R3 BY MR.LELLULAL T.G.THUNDATHIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.15595 of 2009-T = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 12th day of June, 2009. JUDGMENT 1.Notice to fourth respondent is dispensed with preserving her right to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for respondents 1 to 3. 3.The petitioner states that it was on the basis of his complaint that action was taken against a construction being carried out by the fourth respondent. Thereafter, the fourth respondent has presented an application for regularization of the construction. The petitioner seeks an opportunity of being heard in relation to that application. WP(C)15595/2009 -: 2 :- Without prejudice to the contentions of the fourth respondent, it is ordered that the petitioner and the fourth respondent will be heard before a final decision is taken on the fourth respondent's application for regularization. All other issues are left open. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/170609