IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3243 of 2010. Decided on: June 16, 2010. Raksha Devi ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Y.W.Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) Though, the petitioner has challenged Annexure P-5 (proceedings), it appears that the apprehension of the petitioner is that the Inquiry Officer may not take into consideration Annexure P-2 (guidelines), issued by the Directorate of Elementary Education, in the matter of rationalization. We make it clear that while conducting the inquiry as per Annexure P-5, Annexure P-2 and any other relevant instruction in the matter will be taken duly note of by the Inquiry authority. It is also made clear that in case the petitioner has not been paid salary for the period she has actually worked, the same shall be paid within a month. 2. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice June 16, 2010. ( Justice Kuldip Singh ), (karan) Judge. 2