IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2010 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1932 WP(C).No. 15950 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- T.M.JAYADEVI, W/O.K.SURENDRAN, DEPUTY SECRETARY (RETD.), 'SARIGA' MUHAMMA.P.O, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SMT.C.K.SHERIN SRI.A.D.SHAJAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY SECRETARY TO GOVT. LOCAL SELF DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION MUNICIPAL DIRECTORATE OFFICE, VIKAS BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, MUNICIPAL DIRECTORATE, VIKAS BHAVAN.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COCHIN, ERNAKULAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.ANTONY MUKATH SRI.S.RAMESH BABU, SC FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 15950 OF 2010 (P) ===================== Dated this the 25th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner retired from the service of the 4th respondent as a Deputy Secretary on attaining the age of superannuation, on 30/11/2008. According to the petitioner, she is entitled to get an amount of Rs.2,96,375/- towards Provident Fund. It is stated that on account of certain mistakes in the records, she was sanctioned only Rs.1,41,990/-. It is stated that the mistake has to be corrected and she should be paid the entire amount due. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, she has already filed representations to the 3rd respondent seeking correction in the records and for disbursement of the admissible amount. It is stated that these representations are also not considered. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, her application for correction of the alleged mistakes in the PF records have been received and are pending before the 3rd respondent, it is directed that the 3rd respondent shall consider those representations and pass appropriate orders in the matter. This shall be done by the WPC No. 15950/10 :2 : 3rd respondent at any rate within 3 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. 3. Petitioner may produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 3rd respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp