IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 13TH JUNE 2008 / 23RD JYAISHTA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 584 of 2008(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.1632/2007 Dated 26/09/2007 .................... PETITIONER:PETITIONER: ---------------------------------------- ELSY JOHN, AGED 49 YEALRS, W/O.LATE. N.K/TS C.GEORGE JOHN, NO.2571022, CHAKKUNGAL HOUSE, 15/285, UDAYAMPEROOR, 682 307. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAVISANKAR RESPONDENT:2ND RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------------------------- T.C.JOSHI, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRINCIPAL CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS (PENSION), ALLAHABAD. BY THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2/- ...2...... CON.CASE(C)NO.584/2008 S J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents have complied with the judgment. Submission is recorded. In the circumstances, I do not think it is necessary to proceed under the contempt of courts act. Accordingly, the contempt of court case is closed. 13/06/2008 Sd/- V.Giri, Judge /True Copy/ P.A.to Judge V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- Cont. Case No.584 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 2nd June, 2008 O R D E R Learned counsel represented for the Assistant Solicitor General of India prays that the matter may be posted on 13.6.2008 to enable her to report whether the respondent has complied with the directions contained in the judgment. I reminded the counsel on the fact that the Judgment -Annexure A is dated 26.9.2007. Two months time was granted from the date of receipt of the copy of judgment to the respondents to pass orders in terms of the judgment. Extension was later granted at the instance of respondents. Contempt Case was instituted on 4.4.2008 pointing out that judgment ought to have been implemented on or before 12.3.2008. On 7.4.2008, the case was posted on 11.4.2008 as per the request of the counsel for the respondent. Apparently, the matter was not taken up and it was then taken on 23.5.2008 and the following order was passed. Cont. Case No.584 of 2008 2 “Standing counsel for the respondent seeks further time to get instructions. Instructions will be positively obtained by 9.6.2008 as to whether the direction contained in Annexure A has been complied with. If not, the reasons for the delay in the compliance of the same shall be ascertained. Post on 9.6.2008. The case comes up today. Even on this date, compliance as such the directions contained in the judgment have not been reported. The case is posted on 13.6.2008 referring to the request made by the counsel for the respondent. Hand over. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) ma Cont. Case No.584 of 2008 2 Cont. Case No.584 of 2008 2