IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 20 OF 2011 MRS. GORETTI MARIA D'MELLO ALIAS G. D'MELLO ... Appellant Versus MR. AVINASH D'MELO AND 5 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. A. D. Bhobe, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. R. G. Ramani, Advocate for the Respondent nos. 2 and 3. Mr. M. Salkar, Government Advocate for Respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6. Coram:- F. M. REIS, J. Date:- 22nd September, 2011 ORAL ORDER Heard Shri A. D. Bhobe, learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant, Shri R. G. Ramani, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Shri Salkar, learned Government Advocate for the Respondent nos.4, 5 and 6. 2. After hearing the matter for sometime and considering the submissions of the learned Counsel, I find that there is no reason to interfere in the discretion exercised by the learned Judge in granting the injunction in favour of the Respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3. The learned Judge on the basis of the material on record has come to prima facie conclusions that the said Respondents are entitled for the temporary injunction. The learned Counsel for the Appellants was unable to point out any infirmity in such findings of the learned Judge. The Respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6 have also not challenged the impugned Judgment. Considering the controversy involved in the suit, it would be appropriate, in the interest of justice, if the suit pending before the learned Adhoc District Judge-2, FTC-II, South Goa, Margao, is disposed of expeditiously. 3. In view of the above, the Appeal stands dismissed with no orders as to costs. The learned Adhoc District Judge-2, FTC-II, South Goa, Margao, is directed to dispose of the Civil Suit No. 36 of 2010 as expeditiously as possible in any event preferably on or before 30.06.2012. F. M. REIS, J. arp/*