1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR SPL. APPL. WRIT No. 25 of 2010 SMT. ZAREENA PRAVEEN V/S LRS. MUSTAK AHMED & ORS Mr. CP SONI, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 15.2.2010 HON'BLE SHRI A M SAPRE,J. HON'BLE SHRI DINESH MAHESHWARI,J. ORDER ---------- This is a writ appeal under Rule 134 of the Rajasthan High Court Rules. It is filed by the appellant, against the order, dated 26.10.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court whereby the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition and in consequence upheld the order dt. 7.9.2009 of the learned trial court which had rejected the application of plaintiff under O. 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and on perusal of the record of this case, we find no case to interfere in such orders in our appellate jurisdiction at this stage. In our opinion, the remedy of the appellant lie in challenging the order of trial Court, if occasion so arises against the final judgment and decree that will be rendered in the suit out of which this writ appeal arises. It may be 2 that such occasion may arise or may not. If however, occasion so arises then in such event, the remedy to challenge is always available to the appellant. Since, interim orders do not decide the rights of the parties and hence, no interference is called for in the intermediary period at this stage. It is with this liberty, we decline to interfere and dismiss the writ appeal in limine. A copy of this order be sent to concern trial court by the Registry forthwith for information and record. ( DINESH MAHESHWARI ),J. ( A M SAPRE ),J. /Sushil/