IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11892 of 2009 1. SHATRUGHAN SAO @ SHATRUGHAN SAH, son of late Sundar Sah 2. Fulena Sao @ Fulena Sah, son of late Ram Khelawan Sah-------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners that production of the country made pistol by the informant in Mufassil(Singhoul) P.S. case no.203 of 2007 can never be taken for petitioners possession due to their being witnesses also. So basing the same rejection of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is not justified. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Begusarai Muffasil (Singhoul) P.S. case no.38 of 2009, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )