1512cwp638.11. 1` IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No. 638/2011 Laxman Ganpat Salam vs. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. Miss. Archana Ramteke, Adv. (appointed) for petitioner. Mr. T.A.Mirza, APP for respondents. CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & P.B.VARALE,JJ DATE : 15.12.2011 This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner, who is serving his sentence in jail is praying for issuance of a writ that the sentences awarded to the petitioner under sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code be made concurrent. It appears that the petitioner came to be convicted for the aforesaid offences by the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal in Sessions Trial No. 44/2003 ( 19/2006). It further appears on the basis of the affidavit-in-reply filed by the respondents that no orders were passed in respect of making the sentences concurrent by the trial court. It also appears that the petitioner has not filed any appeal. 1512cwp638.11. 2` Entertaining a writ petition directing that the sentences should run concurrently would amount to reviewing the judgment of the Sessions Court, which has now attained finality. The aforesaid exercise cannot be carried out in exercise of writ jurisdiction of this court. In that light of the matter, therefore, this petition is dismissed. However, we quantify the fees payable to the learned counsel appointed for the petitioner at Rs. 1500/-. JUDGE JUDGE patle