IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 23118 of 2006 Between: Syed Moulali, S/o. Imam Saheb, O/o. A.P.S.W. Residential School/Junior College, Nallawagu, Kalhare Mandal, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Secretary, A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational- Society, Hyderabad. 2 The Principal, A.P.S.W.Residential School/College, Nallawagu, Kalhare Mandal, Medak District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the petitioner is eligible and entitle to continuing the service as a Residential Teacher (Hindi) from 11.6.2006 with all consequential benefits, by holding the action of the respondents in not permitting him to join duty as Residential Teacher (Hindi) in the 2nd respondent school as per the renewal orders dt. 11.6.2006 is highly illegal and arbitrary, discriminatory and opposed to the all principals of equity, just is and fair play. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.INDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following ORDER: The petitioner was appointed on contractual basis as a residential teacher (Hindi) in the year 2001. His contract was being renewed year after year up to 2006. His name was also included in the list of contract teachers for Zone-VI. The grievance of the petitioner is that when he reported to duty at the institution, namely A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institution, Nallawagu, the Principal did not permit him to join, alleging that the certificates produced by him are not genuine. This writ petition is filed with a prayer to direct the respondents herein to permit the petitioner to join the second respondent institution. The respondents filed a counter-affidavit stating that discreet enquiries conducted as to the genuinity of the certificates relied upon by the petitioner disclosed that they were not genuine and in that view of the matter, the petitioner was not permitted to join. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. It is a matter of record that the petitioner was selected as contract teacher in the year 2001 and though the contract was for a period of one year, it was renewed year after year. The name of the petitioner was also included in the list of contract teachers in the year 2006. The respondents came to know that the certificates relied upon by the petitioner are not genuine. In addition to that, letters said to have been addressed by Hindi Prachar Sabha were also found to be not genuine. It was in this background that this Court directed the Examination Secretary of Hindi Prachar Sabha to appear before this Court and explain the matter. The Examination Secretary, by name G.R.Narasimha Rao, in whose name the letters as to genuinity of certificates were issued, had appeared before this Court on 15.02.2007. He stated that neither the certificates produced by the petitioner nor the letters said to have been addressed from Hindi Prachar Sabha stating that the certificates relied upon by the petitioner are true; are genuine. With this, the controversy stands resolved and it is established that the petitioner does not hold the requisite qualifications. Therefore, the respondents cannot be compelled to permit the petitioner to join the duty. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 15.07.2008. kdl ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JGK}