CLCON No. 260 of 2009 Hon’ble B.S.Verma,J Heard Sri Anant Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner. This contempt petition has been filed for flouting the order dated 24.4.2009 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 1577 of 2008 (M/S), Smt. Sadqa Begam Vs. State of Uttarakhand and another wherein direction was made to the District Magistrate to determine the actual status of the petitioner in the disputed property who will also make an inquiry and find out as to whether the original lease holder or the heirs of the original lease holder are also interested for conversion of the property into free hold in their name as they would have first right in the property. After perusal of the record, the learned District Magistrate came to the conclusion that the name of the husband of the petitioner Sri Haji Abdul Rahman was recorded as tenant in the register of Municipality but on the basis of the Nazul Policy 2005 enforced by Uttarakhand Government under which Smt. Sadqa Begam has applied, there is no mentioning of allotting the free hold land in favour of the tenant. Therefore, the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner cannot be accepted for the simple reason since the District Magistrate has examined the record and came to the conclusion that the husband of the petitioner was a tenant and was not entitled for the free hold land on the basis of the Nazul Policy, 2005. If the petitioner is aggrieved, he may assail the order before the appropriate forum. With the said observation, the contempt petition is dismissed summarily. Notices issued against the respondent are discharged. (B.S. Verma,J) RMY 3.11.2009