THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1476 OF 2011 01.07.2011 Between: Ponnada Venkata Haribabu …Petitioner AND Rambha Swarajya Lakshmi And others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1476 OF 2011 ORDER: The second defendant in O.S.No.44 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the V Additional District Judge, Rajahmundry is the petitioner in this civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India. The revision is filed against Order dated 30.03.2011 passed by the Court below refusing to receive Memorandum of Partition List dated 25.01.1985 as evidence for want of proper stamp duty and registration. The suit was filed by the first respondent for partition against the petitioner and respondents 2 to 6. The defendants are opposing the suit inter alia on the ground that there was an oral partition of the plaint schedule properties and that the same was reduced to writing on 25.01.1985. During the trial, when the defendants sought to mark the alleged partition list, on an objection raised by the plaintiff’s counsel the Court below did not admit the document in evidence for want of registration. While coming to such a conclusion, the Court below has given cogent and convincing reasons and also recorded a finding that the document in question does not evidence an earlier partition and therefore, it is inadmissible evidence for want of registration. The reasoning for sustaining objection is sound and in accordance with law and the civil revision petition is misconceived. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 01.07.2011 Pln