x IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.l M.A.fC I No ^7 , 2007 B'iHOIft Risasal I'"'£scf^ ^i^iIG^ i£>*S'^^i APPELLANTS Claimants :1. H.N. Soni, aged 54 years Son of Babulal Soni 2. RESPQKDENTS ft 3. Smt. Mamta Soni, aged about 48 years, wife of H.N. Soni, Both resident of village- Pendra, Tahsil Pendraroad, District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS Dilip Kumar, aged about 33 years Son of Shankar, Caste-Gond, Resident of Village-Ranigaon, P.S. Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Shashank Gadhkari, aged about 42 years, Son of K.V. Gadhkari, Resident of Archana Vihar, A.F. 8, NehruNagar, Bilaspur, P.S. Civil Line, Bilaspur (C.G.) United National Insurance Company Limited Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Claim before the Tribunal Awarded amount Rs.43,21,500/- Rs.03,93,500/- 's..- Valuation of the present appeal Rs.02,00,000/- f'^•^:^'^^-^'- 3 ••-t- MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL U/S 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT. 1988 SH^! ?!T R'fi'n W WWI Sllfl'B f") <1THCII »*n<h 75E( "4l'4l?f-4, afllwis, faoi'My ^jft C^O. 2j,9/0^~ ^^.....;....^.....^...........................:...^ 200 sn^r'f^i (I'lfaiy') ?tail<tt< ^^d 011^1 Shri Gautam. Kheta'ap^ Shri Subhash Yadav, J Shri. Dashrath Gupta, None appears for fhe i Heard ou adnussion. 1. This is clamiants' compensation award Claims Tribunal, 'Pe: 12-2006inClaim.Cg 2. As agaiiist fhe aiaoi] Tribunal has.awardi the deceased Vikas died in m.0tor accid^ Rs. 3,93,500/- as q fhe rate of 6% per i tiU its pa}rment, for t Shri Gautam. Kh6, appellants would: has rightly been app +t^d'ifl*1 ^Wdf^ff^>t<it •llf^t^K iTSifiCTSII^T 1, Adv. for the appeUaiit. ^dv. for therespondeiit no. 2. Adv, for the respondent No. 3. ;spoiide3it No. 1. appeal seekuig enhancement of ed by the Additional Motor Accident idra^Road vide its award dated 27- se No. 14/2006. ^ |mt ofRs. 43,21,500/- daim.'ed, the ^d to tfae claimants, fhe parents of |Kumar Sai'af, aged 25 years, who }nt dated 2-11-2004, a total .sum of |3mpensation along wiQi mte'rest at ^nnuin from the date of application Us death. ' f |rapal, learned counsel for fhe si|ibmit tiiat although the multiplier |ied by tlie leai'ned Tribunal,but tlie mU'Ql ijslil ^"11<M AW-IK'IM—FS/95—11 /2008—1,00,000. 311^1 ^il ft-ti^' WIT Sf^ flt*liq) ^ 'ysr "4l<4ld'il, eTily'is, f°«ni'y'j,< QI^JLO- -2-^. W»1CTI tb11<ti W( 200 ai^Ri ''ra^F ('^3^?) tWIIW^fttIaili*! incoine of fhe decei Rs. 50,000/- per ruruiing a jeweler}- therefore at least Rsl been assessed as ind ised has wrongly been assessed as uinum whereas the deceased was ihop and was owner of a liiini bus, 70,000/- per annum ought to have :om.e of fhe deceased. 4. Per contra, Shri S Gupta, learned \Jl 'espectjve No. 2 and 3 respectjvc of the deceased hl: Tribuiial and fhe cojii Tribunal is on highe^ 5. Leamed Tribunal adduced by fhe clali^ the fact that neifi jeweleiy shop was income were filed an| the clamiarits that payee, in fact asses^ liigher side at Rs. 51 no fault can fom' 'nl<<ii-l4)'i t|l*<cif 'il fc^t <r<n«,ii ^aiRiHSii^i Ij.bhash Yadav and Shri Dashrath coutisel appearing for the respondents 3ectjvely, would submit that the iiicome ja.s rightly been assessed by flie tpensation awarded by tlie leamed side. . • • after considermg tJie evidence tiants in detail and after consideruis lier registrafion^certificate ,of ,the ffled nor documents relattng to )d also considering flie aclmission of |the deceased was not income tax sed fhe income of flie deceased on ip,000/- per annuia aad, therefore, ld in tlie assessment of the tocome ^fi aitifl-'KMi is;""<*i CTa-iR?[ra—FS/95—11/2008 —i,oo,ooo. cr iSSS-h >4 dll^tl Vf it;-1i+ OTt 311^51 a>*<m 'S'S? -t{WW<i, 8)Tll+illS, f°«11'M'l,< ^(»jo.^97^9- ^^.._................................—.....^200 SII^T •qg^' (yif^i^) by the Tribunal andl compensation, awari 6. No other ground has for the appeUant opinion of fhis substance, is liabli summarily at admis; 7. No order as to costs. C4>urt 'hl*)ifl<fl-l HIMfffi'ii'fe1^ <.l»it<cK ^sjfmaii^r consequently, 111 assessment of the led to the appetlai^ts. been raised by fhe leamed counsel aiid therefore, in fhe considered t, the appeal betng devoid of to be and is herebv dismissed aon stage itsplf. • Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge »IIU<0<1<ilsft4 'ii;"ll<-MI VSlWaei—TS/95— I1/20B8—1,00,000.