1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA Criminal Original Petition(MD) No.8298 of 2011 S.Jeyaraman .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Inspector of Police, CBCID., Tirunelveli, Tirunelvlei District. 3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. 4.The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. .. Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to transfer the investigation in Crime No.108 of 2011 pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Thoothukudi to the second respondent viz., CBCID, Tirunelveli or the third respondent viz., District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi. For Petitioner :Mr.C.Mayil Vahana Rajendran For Respondents:Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Govt.Advocate(Crl.Side) O R D E R The petitioner approaches this Court with a prayer to transfer the investigation in Crime No.108 of 2011 pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Thoothukudi to the second respondent viz., CBCID, Tirunelveli or the third respondent viz., District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, the case in Crime No.108 of 2011 for the alleged offences under Sections 419,420,465,468,471 and 474 IPC has been registered on 26.03.2011, but so far, the petitioner was not examined by the Investigating Agency and that the respondent has not shown any interest to conduct the case. Hence, the petitioner filed this petition to transfer the investigation in Crime No.108 of 2011 pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Thoothukudi to the second respondent viz., CBCID, Tirunelveli or the third respondent viz., District Crime Branch, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Thoothukudi. 3.Heard the learned Government Advocate(Criminal Side) for the respondents. 4.The main grievance of the petitioner is that the fourth respondent has not shown any interest to investigate the matter and file charge sheet. The occurrence has taken place on 26.03.2011. It is not fit case to transfer the case to the second respondent/The Inspector of Police, CBCID, Tirunelveli or the the third respondent viz., District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi. However, I am inclined to direct the fourth respondent to investigate the matter as expeditiously as possible. I am also giving the direction to the first respondent to take personal attention for investigating the matter under his supervision and the fourth respondent is directed to investigate the matter as expeditiously as possible. 4.With the above direction, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (P&A) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Inspector of Police, CBCID., Tirunelveli, Tirunelvlei District. 3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. 4.The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. 5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. gsr : GH : 22.07.2011 : 2p/6c Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8298 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/