IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20028 of 2011 Bharat Mahto Son Of Late Kishun Mahto Of Village Jhikatia, P.S. Navi Nagar, District-Aurangabad… … … Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India Through Secretary Energy Department, Govt. Of India, New Delhi, 2. Chairman, National Thermal Power Corporation, New Delhi, 3. Chief Executive Officer, N.T.P.C. Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, 4. Bhartiya Rail Bijali Company Ltd. Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Dalmia Nagar Rohtas, 5. The General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur, District Vaishali, 6. Deputy General Manager, B.R.B.C.L. Rohtas, 7. District Magistrate, Aurangabad, 8. District Land Acquisition Officer, Aurangabad, 9. Sri Radha Shyam Prasad, Asst. Engineer, B.L.B.C.L. Dalmia Nagar, Rohtas, … … Respondents For the Petitioner: Ms. Alka Verma, Advocate For the State: Mr. Krishna Chandra, AC to AG ---------------------------------- 2 24.11.2011 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application enabling the petitioner to move before the appropriate authority for redressal of his grievances. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioner. It is made clear that if such an application is 2 filed by the petitioner before the appropriate forum it is expected from the concerned authority to consider the same in accordance with law. It is also made clear that if any notification is made under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 or any Act for the purpose of acquisition of the land of the petitioner, then this order would not come in the way of the petitioner in moving before the appropriate forum in response thereto also under the statutory provisions. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)