5m. DiViSiéiV' EEiiCH : PETH‘IOENR REgPONDENTs Government in changing g Kabirdham, has flied the in raspondents. The only submissio made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the Chang in the name of the Distn'ct has been effecteri by the State withou there being any express authority with - the respondents. After going thmugh ‘2 1-0 1—2008 Snn Rajeev Shn‘vastav , counsel for the petitionér. Shri MP3. Bhatia, P ei Lawyér for the Staml respomients The petitioner bein of Chhattisgarh, through Principal Generai retary, D rtmentj Mantraiaya, “KS. e a Co lector, Kawardha (OGJ rieved by the decision of the State e name of the District Kawardha as petition for suitable direction to the t e averments made in the petition and after hearing learned couns l for the parties, we are satisfied that Krishna Mishra, S/o. .Shri Asharfi Lal ra, aged $6 years, Oceupéfion Advocate, Village & l’ost Chaeheii‘t, Tahsil 85 District— Administration Rhavan , s g 1 h 31mm (W) W m 200 Wm mwm mwiffsér 3imm interference by this Court. Accordingly, the petition ix Sdl- Dhirendra Mishra ‘ Judge " is dismised. // Sdl— T.P. ‘Sha’iima Judgi‘e" mam $3M WW, W’ ‘ F5/59— 2/2007 —30,oou. them is no public intarest imJoived‘ in this petition which warrants m $ s