IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 1307 of 2009 Date of Decision: February 11 , 2009 Vishav Kumar Sharma ...... Petitioner Versus State Bank of Patiala and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. After arguing for sometime learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw this writ petition and states that he will move an appropriate application for grant of pension and provident fund and that the respondent-bank be directed to consider the same as per law within a specified time frame. I find this request to be genuine. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn while reserving the liberty to the petitioner to agitate his application for pension/provident fund before the respondent-bank. In case the said application is moved within within a period of four weeks from today the respondent-bank shall pass a speaking order thereon within a period of three months thereafter CWP No. 1307 of 2009 -2- and, in case the petitioner is found entitled to any amounts would also release the same within a period of one month subsequently. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE February 11 , 2009 sunita