IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 27TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 5TH ASWINA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 6089 of 2010() ---------------------------------------- LPC.124/2006 of CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, KASARAGOD CRIME NO.710/2005 OF KASARAGOD POLICE STATION. .................... PETITIONER/4TH ACCUSED: ----------------------------------------- SAJNAS PARIS, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.MOHAMMED ALI, KADAVATHU HOUSE, CHEMNAD, KASARGOD. BY ADV. SRI.S.JIJI RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------- THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KASARAGOD POLICE STATION, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR.C.S. HRITHWIK. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/09/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: rs. V.RAMKUMAR, J. ---------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.6089 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of September, 2010 ORDER The petitioner, who is accused No.4 in Crime No.710 of 2005 of Kasaragod Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148 & 324 read with Section 149 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Consequent on the non-appearance of the petitioner before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kasaragod in L.P.C.No.124 of 2006, non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. 3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same day on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of Bail Appln.No.6089/2010 : 2 : non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner and also after considering the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non-appearance. With the above observation this application is disposed of. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj