IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2008 / 3RD SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 21637 of 2008(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SAJI MATHEW, AGED 30, S/O. K. SAMUEL, ALIN VILAYIL PUTHEN VEEDU, THEKKEKARA.P.O, MAVELIKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.VINCENT JOSEPH RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REP. BY VICE CHANCELLOR. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SYNDICATE, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REP. BY THE VICE CHANCELLOR. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, KERALA UTY. FOR R1 TO 3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.21637 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner seeks ‘re-ascertainment’ of marks of one paper of his LLM examination. The very fact that he has used the word ‘re-ascertainment' shows that there is no rule infact for revaluing the answer paper. It is settled law that for post- graduate courses, no revaluation of answer papers is permitted for the very reason that the papers are valued by two examiners in the first instance itself. Therefore, I do not think that in the absence of any rule to enable the petitioner to get his answer paper revalued, he can get any relief in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd