IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2215 of 2011 NANDU PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 323,341, 354,504/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 3(1) (X) (XI) of the S.C./S.T.(Prevention of Atrocities)Act. It is alleged against the petitioner to tease the daughter of the informant and on protest, assault was made and the informant was abused by calling her caste’s name. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the occurrence is of 04.09.2010 whereas an F.I.R. was lodged on 29.09.2010. Though the petitioner’s side lodged the case on 16.09.2010 itself as contained in Annexure-2. Unexplained delay of twenty five days in lodging the case and the case lodged by the petitioner’s side prior in time do not inspire confidence with regard to accusation of petitioner, let the petitioner - 2 - above named be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with S.C./S.T. P.S. Case No. 37 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P. C. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)