•-'. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SinaleBench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanthotri.J. Writ Petition (S.) No.3353 of 2008 Petitioner Versus Umesh Kumar Bahidar, age about 48 years, ^stt, TeacherTS/o Shri Nimai Charan Bahidar,Govt. Middle School Robertson, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt. Raipur (C.G^ District Education OfRcer, Distt. Raigarh((;.GJ WritPetitionunderArtiGle226oftheGonstitutionoflndia ResDondefite; Present: Shri Somkanf Verma.counset for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Depufy Govemment Advocate for the State/respendents. ORALORDER (Passed on thls1d dayofJuly, 2008) f?.. " •' " •'.• " . •."•'..••..,' '• : •'".'••'.- ••••..- With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is heard finally. (2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submife that the petitioner was appointed as Deputy Teacher on a fbced pay of Rs.150/- in the year 1982. After completion of probation perioy, the petitioner was granted regular pay-scate. He further submits that the issue invotved in the case isas to whether the pefitioner is entitled to regular pay-scale with effect from the dateof initial appointment or after completion of probation period. Leamed counsel ftirther submits ttiat the issue involved in this case is squarely covered by a decision of the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur passed in Original Applicatlon No.2745/1989 (Madwkant Yadu and56 oftera vs. Gtopal jy- Stete <rf M.P. and athers), wherein it was held that similariy sifaiated teachersare entitled to regular pay-scale with effect from the date <rf iniUal appointment. (3) The matter was taken-up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court upholding the decision ofttie Tribunal in Madhukant Yadu and SBothets vs. Stateof M.P. andothws (supra). (4) tn view of the above submissions made by Feamed counsel appearing for the parties, the writpetjUon is dlsposed of in the same terms, i.e., the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation; if so advised, to consider his case, if he stands on the same footings, as per the order dated 24-08-1992 passed by the Madhya Pradesh State Administratwe Tribunal, Jabalpur in Original Application No.2745/1989 (Madhukani Yadu and otftersvs. Stateof M.P. and ottwrs) (supra) and subsequently confirmed by the orderdated 03-01-1994 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (CMI) No.6892/1993and grant relief accordingly. (5) In view of the foregoing, the petiUon is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge . ...t