w R =-; i^i a^^ ^ (^ a "& ^ii ; c^ <- so •'"<, IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. fS) No._/200S? PETITIONER y \^:'''',^ .^y^ ^•^y ..•••'" " '^'scv / .•••"'"M''^'''" /••r^.'-Y',-!1' /^\Yy ^^' ^ ^".^•" ss^" *- : Ku.Urmila Sav 5?/o. Shri Harishchandra Sav Aged about 32 years Post-Assistant Teacher R/o. Village -Dharamjaigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh (C.G ) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Block-Dharamjaigarh District-Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A ^226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS HISH COURT OF CHHATTES6ARH /»TW-ASPUft W. P. (5)No. 954 of 2007 Petitioner ; Ku. Urmila Sav Versus Respondents 5*crte of Chhatt-isgarh A owther .'-J^ Sir^le Bench: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satfeh K. ^gnihotri. Mr. Anil Mourya, Adyocute for -the RetM-ioner. Ms. &infta Jain. Ponel Lawyer for •the State/redpondents. OR&ER O'nssed on -this 20th t>ay of Februory, 2(X)7) 1. Lefsved counsel appearing for -the petitioner submits •that the petitioner is woricing cus Assistont Teacher m the ©ovemmentPrimary School faHOB-para, DhanMnjaigart), District-Raigarh. The petitioner has obtained B.T.I. Ex<nnination certificate in the year 1995, on his own expenses. 2. Leamed counsel cppeciring for the petitioner submits •that the question inwlwd, herein asto whether ttie teadier, who obtahed B.T.I. Examination Cerl'ificate on his own oqwnses, is entitfed to two odvance increments. 3. According to teomed counsel for Ihe petitioner, ihe petitioner is entitted to two advance increments in view of the decision of -this Court- h the case of yashwant Kumar Bhanidwqj Vs. Mumcipal Corporation, burg and another {2006 (EI) AAPJR-C6 96}. This Court in -riie ctsse of ya^hwaant Kumar HianidwBy Vs. Mimicyol Corporation, -^ Durg and cmother (Supra), came to the conckision that -the teachers, who hal obtained B. Ed. /B.T.L Examination Certificate on their own expenses, are covered by the circulnr dated 24.12.98 issued by the State Sovemment of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Leamed counset for the petitioner furl+ier submits that Ihe facts cnd question of kw involwd in the present case are squarely covered by decision of this Court- in the case of yashwant Kunar Wiaradwaj Vs. Municipal Corporution, Durg and another (Supra), to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents fairly concedes and agrees with the averment made by teamed counsel cppearing for the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is alloued in tenns of the order passed in the case of yash«»ant Kumar Blwrudtiwy Vs. Municipal Corpor'ation. Ourg and anuther (Supra), subject to verifjcutiM) of the fact as to whe-ttier the petitioner has acquired B.T.I. Exammation *' CertificatB on his own expenses as perihe circulou-sdated 24.12.1998 & 1.3.1999 cnd furt+ier urfiether he has been paid Iwo advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Subhash Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge