CD ^r, ^ .r^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR C.G.) W.P.NO. \\^A /2001 PETITIONERS ^&^ J'1''^^'^ ^^^•^^.-•"" ^;^$^' ^^T. ..."••" '6^ '" ': 1. K.D.Saggar, s/o Hansraj Saggar High School road, Takhatpur, Bilaspsur (CG). 2. R.N.L.Devangan, S/o Shri R.S. Devangan, Block Office Road, Takhatpur, Bilaspur [CG] ..' 3. Arjun Singh Thakur, S/o Battu Singh Thakur^ Umaria P.0. Beeja, Tah-Takhatpur, Bilaspur [CG] 4. F.R.Srivas, S/o B.P.Srivas, Pathakpara,Takhatpur, Bilaspur[CCT] 5. R.K.Tiwari, S/o Shri G.P.Tiwari, Guptapara., Takhatpur3ilaspur [CG] 6. W.Bennett S/o Late E Bannett Qld Mission Compound, Block Office Road, Takhatpur., Bilaspur[CG] 7. Smt. Vimla Devi Shukla, Widow ofLate K.L.Shukla, Takhatpur, Bilaspur [CG]. 8. Smt. Vimla Mishra, Widow of Late R.K.Mishra, R/o Post Belsari, viaTakhatpur, Bilaspur [CG] Ve rs u s s^'^^.-.w.^^^s^^ / RESPONDENTS - 2. State ofChhatisgarh through Secretary, Education Department., Govemment of Chhatisgarh, Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Jhamaklal Motilal Pandey Higher Secondary School Taldiatpur, Distt: Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, Bilaspur (Chhatisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE vr 226/227 OF CONSTIUTUTION OF INDIA r^"" XI-HC-22 '^Sf'^TPTRPT, ^xll^^Ko, fa<ni<iy ^TT^T^T r<rii<=h ^^ ^^ict) ^f^a E^-S"-: WR^IT^^Ich f^^T" ^TI^T'^YT^T'^T 06-08-2 Shri Shailendra Shukla, Couns^ Sliri Viiiod Shrivastava, Govl. Application for urgent hearing Heard. Leamed counsel for the petitio) non-payment of the pension to the pe| case of the petitioners is similar to 01 599 (CA. Bhakhare Vs. State ofMat Leamed counsel for the Stat petitioners may make the detailed authority ofthe respondents, which sh accordance with law. Havmg coiisidered and withoul ofthe case, in the opinion ofthisCoi direction is given to the petitioners raising their grievances before tlie coi along with a copy ofthe petition and such representation being filed, the c< shall decide the same on its own meri with law as early as possible preferai: i^ ofreceipt ofthe representation and th^ chl^id<41r1 TOTRTf ^ 'fe^t <F?i^i< '^srf^Fra^T for the petitioners. Ldvocate^ for the State. allowed. lers submits that the matter relates to itioners. He further submits that the le, which is reported in 1987 MPLJ rAya Pradesh & Others). submits that for the present the t*epresentation before the competent dl be considered on its own merits in |expressing any opitiion on the merits \rt, ends ofjustice will be served if a to make the detailed representation |apetent authority of the respondents, ^his order, within one month, and on ^petent authority ofthe respondents, [s by a reasoned order in accordance |y within three months from the date lamount, iffbund legally due, bepaid [Tf^-§[fi^ XI-HC-22 3TI^T^T f<rli<=h 3TI^T 5^^ich ^f^a ^ •^oET ^II^IH^, ^Tll^^Ko, fa<ytl^1< 3TI^T xra^ 'Wq^IT'gTTlN?'**'*****'*'"***'*****^ ** ^T^ 20° 'IN^ST' 3^T^mW^Tf^T 2^ chl^l(d<lflTl W^ ^ fest <^i<^i< '^37f^H37T^T to the petitioners. It is made clear ^at if any grievance still remams, the petitioners may avail the remedy availjable under4he law. Withthe aforesaidobservation^, this petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per pjles. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^l