IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9348 of 2009 Date of Decision : October 20, 2011. Lyallpur Khalsa College .....Petitioner versus Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Amrit Paul, Advocate for the respondents. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-College impugns the action of Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, demanding fine and payments of the dues/fee on account of excess admissions of students made during the academic year 2006-2007. It appears that in the year 2009 when the writ petition was filed, the University-authorities asked the petitioner-college to deposit the due amount, failing which the students were not to be permitted to appear in the annual examinations. This Court, therefore, vide order dated 24.6.2009 while observing that the administrative feuding should not affect the interest of the students, directed the University not to with-hold the CWP No.9348 of 2009 [2] result of the students, subject to the petitioner-college furnishing a bank guarantee to the extent of Rs.2 lac. The petitioner college complied with that order and furnished the bank guarantee of Rs.2 lac. Meanwhile, it appears that the petitioner-college has approached the University- authorities highlighting the mitigating circumstances and/or to persuade them to take a lenient view in the matter. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that some favourable decision is likely to be taken by the University-authorities. In this situation of the matter and without expressing any views on the merits of the issues involved, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondent-University to re- consider the matter, if a representation to this effect has been made by the petitioner-College, taking a sympathetic view in accordance with its regulations/policies and pass an appropriate speaking order as early as possible but not later than three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Till the decision is taken by the University-authorities, the petitioner shall get the bank guarantee revalidated. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. October 20, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE