1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2952 OF 2009 Subhashchandra Pandey and Ors. ...Applicants. v. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondents. Mr.Anilkumar Patil, adv. For the Applicant. Ms.S.V.Gajare, APP For the Respondent/State. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : JUNE 24, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 This application was filed to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.I-56/09 registered at Shil Dayghar police station, Thane under different provisions of the I.P.C. on a report lodged by one Swami Rao Mallinath Chendke, who is the respondent no.2 before this Court. The learned counsel also informs that petitioner no.1 Subhash has also filed cross report with the police. The learned APP on instructions from the I.O. makes a statement that after investigation chargesheet has been filed against the opposite party. However, investigation in this case could not be completed in view of the ad-interim stay to the investigation as per the order dated 2nd September, 2009. The learned APP makes a statement that if the stay is vacated police may complete the 2 investigation and charge-sheet may be filed within one month if necessary before the Magistrate. She also makes a statement that out of 15 accused persons, 11 are already arrested and released on bail. The learned counsel for the applicants makes a statement that some amicable settlement has already taken place between the parties to some extent. In view of the above circumstances, application stands disposed off with the following directions: i Ad-interim stay dated 2nd September, 2009 is vacated. Police may complete the investigation and if sufficient material is found against the accused, they may file charge-sheet. They will give 3 days prior intimation to the accused persons before filing the chargesheet so that remaining four accused persons may appear before the Magistrate, if necessary. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)