: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.386 OF 2005 Jagdish M.Joshi ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents Sarvashri Shirish Gupte, Senior Counsel i/b Ganesh Gole for Petitioner. Sarvashri G.Vahanvati, Solicitor General with A.M.Chimalkar for the C.B.I. CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKER & , P.V.KAKADE, JJ. DATE : 16th MARCH, 2005. P.C. 1. The learned Solicitor General states that the Respondents do not intend to execute the Warrant issued at this stage, as the Petitioner has appeared before the Respondents and is also co-operating in the matter of investigation. He has also made it clear that though at the moment there is no need of the accused being arrested, in future if the investigation discloses involvement and necessity of his arrest the appropriate steps in that regard will be taken. In view of the said statement, which we accept, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner craves leave to withdraw the Petition. The : 2 : Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on any of the issues sought in the petition. (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) (P.V.Kakade,J.)