/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THE RD DAY OF APRIL 1998 BEFORE THE ‘LE MR • JUSTICE H N. NARAYAN I /1 CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: Srnt, Bhagirathj Mahabaleshwar Naik 1 aged 50 years 0 resident of Makheri Karwar TO, North KaLnataka Diat, • (By Sri,V.PKujkarnj, Adv, for tr 0 ) v/s I,Sri,Vasant Mahibaleshwar Ka at, C/c M S .Kamat, M B, 12 Hon I Boa d Colony, Bayna, Vasco, Sos, 2 New India insurance Comparv Bayria, Vasco, • • — ‘i I ** * Civil Revio o Pctjtjon is tiled U/ 15 of CPC against t1e ze dt:27,3, 998, passed in NO:86/92, on the f1e of the Df St, Judge & Member MACT, Karwar • € • • This Civil Revision Petition coming on for hearing this day, the Court made the following:— ORDER The MACT, Karwar has allowed the claim petition in part tiled by the petitioner on account of the of her husband in a motor accident, A total compensation of Rs,1,41,300/— has been awarded by the MACT. Further, a sum of Rs,7O,000/— has been directed to deposit in the name of the first peti.tioner with pennission to wlthdraw interest that accnaes on the said deposIt. She has thereafter made an application before the Tribunal pleading for release of the said am nt for pert orniing the marriage ci he. r first daughter, the. 2nd petitioner, T:he marriage is fixed on 9,4,1998. The tribunal has rejected ti.is application as unreasonable. But to my wind, the order of the MACT is not justifiable, havig regard to the special request ma by the petitioner,. . ,,3. ,, —3— to release the amount, Fet*tioner has produced the wecGnq cara of her daughter to show that she is performing tne marriage of ncr daughter and that the amount is reguired for genuine necessity and shC is not squandering the money for any other pirpose. in view of the above, the revision is allowed. The Tribunal is directed to release tne amount. Sd/ JUtX3E, YB)!, tI.y R.BY. C BY An’tr1t Wafrp , 4 LI h Curt ef F a ,eo un e Y I *1 %a