HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, DHARWPD BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF RARNPTAKA AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE iU DAY OP MARCH 201 I CONCILL\TORS PRESENT: HOMBLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B. \DI AND SRI B.S. KAMATE. MEMBER Lok Adalat No.272/2011 BETWEEN: M AHABOO BSAB, S 0 PELRSAB BISALAH ALl I u DODDAMANI, \GED ABOL’T 31 ‘E’\R 0CC: BUSINESS AND R/O, KARUR VILLAGE, RANEBENNUR, TO. AND 01ST. LIAVERI APPELLANT (BY SRI. MAHESH. WODE•YAR, ALVOCATE) AND: 1, BEERESH lvi, PUJAR. \GL JJOP UE( p R/O. HA.LAGERI ROAD, GANESH SAW MILL, EBEN\R Lim AZR (OWNER OF THE V.EHICLE) ( \‘“c, is : z SUJATHA COMPLEX, P13. .ROAD, HUBLI, REPRESEJ$T11.D BY ITS DIX Si0 PAL 7I ANAG ER (BY SRI. P. H. PAWAR, ADVOCATE• FOR 172, Ri SERVED) M1% HEEl) I S 1 ‘Sjlj flF M\ iCI. AGAI?S1 rut-: .JL’nGMENr SD WS RD D-\TEI) 22.1)1 .2O0 PASSED IN IVC NO 244. 2002 ON TIlE FIEF 01’ THE CI1L JUDGE 1 SR ON) ND ADI)L MAC 1’. RAI%EBE?t 1 NLR PARRY %Li OWING TIlE (‘I AIM PETITION FOR coMPENS rio’s AND Si’ k KING ENHNCFMEN1 OF C’OMPENS4TION TillS APPEAL tOMINO ON FOR COT%CILIATION BEFORE LOK T)L S k1’TFR I3FING RE! ERRLD VIOL ORDER D%fLD its 04 .011, flEE POT.LOVdNCr (‘C)NCILIVI’TON ORDER IS PASSED C 0NCILIAION ORDER Both sides are present After negotiation, the parties have arnved at a settlement A joint memo is filed in this regard 2 The second respondent submits that. he is aueeable to pa3 ?l .00 000/ m lumpium i e. over and abovc the amount awaided Lw the MACT. being thc full and final settlement of the claim of the appellant 3 Both thc. parties have sigwd thc consent meir n. ‘1-c cni cspordin shal ‘q’’ nçecd ir ‘art belorc the MAcf ith’n a pe”nd r.t six ceIc 1 n,rr r 1 v .iate of uc’c.ipt sf op’ I this ‘n-cl’ In ..‘sc rf detaulL thc mint h€l1 air u’ Sasltt’).J p *I1’1t 1 oSiti.. C, 4fr