IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI FRIDAY, THE 6TH MAY 2011 / 16TH VAISAKHA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 226 of 2011(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SABEER, S/O ABDUL HAMEED, AGED 25 YEARS, SABEENA MANZIL, PAZHUVILA, MUKKOM ROAD, PALLICKAL P.O. BY ADV. SRI.R.GOPAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KILIMANOOR POLICE STATION, KILIMANOOR P.O., PIN-695604. 2. THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALLICKAL POLICE STATION, PALLICKAL P.O., PIN-695604. 3. RAMLA BEEVI, SHIMA MANZIL, PAZHUVILA P.O., PIN-695604. 4. SHINA, SHIMA MANZIL, PAZHUVILA P.O., PIN-695604. MR.BENNY GERVACIS, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. ---------------------------------- WP (Crl.) No.226 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 6th day of May, 2011 J U D G M E N T Antony Dominic, J. This petition has been filed stating that the petitioner is in deep love with Ms.Shaija A.R., daughter of the 3rd respondent and the younger sister of the 4th respondent. It is alleged that when the marriage between the petitioner and the aforesaid Ms.Shaija was proposed, the same was opposed by the party respondents and that in order to prevent Ms.Shaija from getting married to the petitioner, she was being kept under wrongful confinement by the party respondents. 2. When the matter was came up for admission, this Court by order dated 03/05/2011 directed respondents 3 & 4 to produce the alleged detenue. Accordingly, today, when the matter was taken up, the detenue was produced, and we asked her as to whether she is under wrongful confinement as alleged by the petitioner. In answer, in categorical terms, she has told us that she is not under WP(Crl.) No.226/2011 -2- any wrongful confinement of anybody and that on her own wish she is residing with her mother. Now that such categorical statement has been made by the detenue before this Court, we find no substance in the allegation on the basis of which this Writ Petition has been filed. Therefore, this Writ Petition has only to be dismissed and we do so. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) (P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE) jg