IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 417 OF 2006 SHRI PRADEEP KHAUNTEE, PORVORIM ....Petitioner GOA. Versus SHRI LADU GAONKAR AND ANR., ....Respondents Mr. S.M. Walwaikar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. Coram:- DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 9th October, 2006 P.C.:- Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondent no.2. Perused the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of the respondent no.2. Over and above, the learned Counsel for the respondent no.2 states that the requisite inspection of the documents as well as copies of the documents will be given by tomorrow. In view of the statement, the learned Counsel for the petitioner is not pressing for the same. Hence, this petition is allowed to be withdrawn. DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.