IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.43 of 2009 MD. SABIR & ORS Versus MD. ILLIYAS & ANR ----------- 2. 16.1.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners. It is really unfortunate that somehow there has been an impression that when a court makes certain observation and/or passes an inconvenient order that by itself would become a valid ground for transfer of the case. In the present case only because the court had awarded a cost of Rs.500/- against the petitioner, an application came to be filed by the petitioner before the District Judge, Aurangabad seeking transfer of two appeals by a reason that the petitioner had lost faith in the court and was suspicious about getting justice from the court because O.P.No.2 and his lawyer were always seen visiting the chamber of the Presiding Officer. Such vague allegation in fact has been rightly not found worth examination much less fit to be acted upon by the District Judge while rejecting the prayer for transfer of the case. It becomes clear 2 from the reading of Annexure 1, the application seeking transfer, that it was aimed only to demoralize the court and that is how a wholly frivolous and malafide application seeking transfer of two pending appeals was filed. Rejection of such prayer by the District Judge was perfectly justified and would require no interference of this Court. That being so, this Civil Revision Application is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/