IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.160 of 2010 Mrs. Reena Mahrol, wife of Late Suresh Kumar, Ex-L.T.O.P. No. 153069 K, resident of Village-Ghegha Bamba Market, House No.4, P.O. & P.S.- muradnagar, District- Gaziabad (U.P.) presently residing at C/o Sri Moti Lal Ram, resident of Mohalla- Deegha, behind Alpana Cinema Hall, P.O.-Deegha, District- Patna ...........................................................................Petitioner. Versus 1. The Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Government of India, New Delhi. 2. The Chief of Naval Staff, Naval Headquarters, South Block, New Delhi. 3. The Commodore, Bureau of Sailors (S.S.O. Pension), Cheetah Camp Mankhurd, Mumbai-400088. 4. The State of Bihar through the Director, Directorate of Ex-Service Men Welfare, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. ..........................Respondents. ----------- 2. 07. 01. 2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Respondent-Union of India. The grievance of the petitioner is that authorities have not considered the representation of the petitioner with regard to claim for family pension upon death of her husband who was working as Ex-L.T.O.P. No. 153069 K. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Union of India submits that in case petitioner files a representation stating details of her claim, the same shall be considered as per law without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of her grievances as highlighted in the writ application, petitioner proposes to file a fresh represent before Respondent No. 3 with a copy to Respondent No.4. In case, such representation is filed along with relevant documents in support of her claim as also certified copy of the 2 present order within a period of six weeks from today, Respondent No. 3 shall consider and dispose of her claims in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that grievance of the petitioner could be settled without delay. However, in case, representation filed by the petitioner is not acceptable, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. With the above observations/directions, the writ application stands disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)