IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2011 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32492 of 2011(J) ------------------------ PETITIONER : -------------------- SANTHOSH. P. CHACKO, PALLITHAZHE VEETTIL, ANICADU WEST, KOTTAYAM TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN SRI.R.REJI SMT.THARA THAMBAN SRI.B.BIPIN SMT.REVATHY P.NAIR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM, PIN-686 002. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM, PIN-686 002. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KOTTAYAM TALUK, PIN-686 001. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ANICADU VILLAGE KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN-686 001. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 32492 of 2011(J) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE SALE DEED DATED 5.4.2010. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE SALE DEED DATED 24.4.1996 NUMBER 774. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF SALE DEED NO. 653 DATED 3.4.1996. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SENT BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 25.10.2011. EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION SENT BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD AND 4TH RESPONDENTS DATED 27/11/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 32492 of 2011 J ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 7th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ According to the petitioner, on the strength of Ext.P1 title deed, he made an application to the fourth respondent for mutation of the property. Orders were not passed. Therefore, he made complaints to the third respondent also. In spite of all these, there has not been any progress and that led the petitioner to file this writ petition. 2. In the light of the aforesaid allegations, I direct that, if the application made by the petitioner has been received by the fourth respondent and is pending, orders thereon shall be passed. This, the fourth respondent shall do, at any rate, within four weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/07/12