‘ GH AT BELASPUR H$GH CGUFET aF C2HHATTE$ {Hm Mr. Juwce wi‘gmker Biwaker) WET FEWFHON {223’} No. 3?1§ 6f 29a8 R Mr. Arag Dayai Shrivasmva. caunsel for the petététzners. M. Rajeev Shrivastava with Mr. Akhtar Hussain, counsel for responnient No.1. Mr. Vaibhav Govardhan, counsei far responciant No.2. ’ 227 OF THE CONST§TUT!GN IA R (08.94.2Q09) Chalienge in is writ petition s to the order dated 22.12.2a07 ‘ \{Annexure-P—‘U passed by the Civii oudge Ctass 2i, Bilaspur by which the amendment applioation filed by the poritioner under Order 6 Rule 17' reaq , with Section 151 of the Cocie of Civil Procedure has been dismissed. Vide a m r WRIT PETITmN UNDER ARWCLE OF WD O R D E th i K »\ \ PE‘HTmwER5 1. Khiyaia Bas {dew} Through LRs : Sefem’iants _ ' a. Smt. Heera Bai, aged 72 yeam b. Sachchagand Bajaj, agauE 50 yrs. c. Kishan Cham Bajaj, aged 40 ws. d. Snanjay Bajaj. aged? 33 yrs. no. a wEfe and b to d are sfo Shri Khay&% gas. rfo Sineihi Coiany Bi1a5pur C.G. 2, Smt. $hakuntala Devi, wio Shri Om Prakash Agrawal, r!o Near Sai Mandir Vaishali Nagar Choack, Talapara BE!aspur{C.G.) 3. Ratiram, aged 85 yrs, slo Shri Bodhawa, rio : Gram- Sendari, Tah - Bilaspur, Distt— Bitaspur {c.G.) VERSaUS RE$PDNDENTS 1. Sadhram, aged 52 yrs, sio Shri Jaitram, F’Eaimiffs rlo : Garam- $endari, Di$€t : Biiaspur {C.G.} 2. State of CG, Through : The Couector Biiaspur (C.G.) order dated $522008 (AnneXure P-2) the review ap “cation filed by the petitioners hes also been rejected. 2.‘ Heard; counsel for’the parties and perused the material i available on record. 3. Admitted position is that even the issues have not been framed by l the Court; below and the amendment soujght for by the petitioners/defendants in the written Statement will not cause any prejudice to the plaintiff because if the plaintiffWants to make any amendment in the piaint he would be entitled to do so in accordance with iaw. 4. in View of above, the petition is allowed. The amendment sought for by the petitioners/defendants in the written statement is ailowed subject to payment of cost of Rs. 500 to the plaintiff. Petitioners/defendants would be entitled to make consequential amenment. d d/~ rwaker ' e ' i l r Z S Pritinker s Judg