IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3288 OF 2011 Between : Veereli Pulla Reddy ... PETITIONER A N D Anumula Kothuraiah Setty …RESPONDENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3288 OF 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order and decree, dated 06.05.2011, in I.A.No.108 of 2011 in O.S.No.63 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Dhone, whereunder and whereby, the application filed under Order XVI Rule 7 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’) to summon the Village Revenue Officer for production of No.3 Adangal and to give evidence in respect of survey No.112 of Kolumulapalli Village on payment of batta, was dismissed on the ground that the petitioner has not followed the procedure for obtaining the certified copy of No.3 Adangal from the concerned authorities. 2. The petitioner herein filed O.S.No.63 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Dhone, for declaration of title and consequential injunction against the respondent herein. Pending suit, the petitioner filed the above Interlocutory Application under Order XVI Rule 7 read with Section 151 CPC to summon the Village Revenue Officer for production of No.3 Adangal. After hearing both sides, the Court below dismissed the said application. 3. A procedure is prescribed for obtaining the certified copies. If revenue officials refused to give certified copy of No.3 Adangal, then the petitioner can as well request the Court to issue summons to the concerned officials for production of No.3 Adangal and to give evidence regarding that document. The petitioner has not followed the procedure contemplated under Rule 129 (3) of the Civil Rules of Practice for obtaining the certified copy of No.3 Adangal. Therefore, the Court below rightly dismissed the same and that order needs no interference by this Court. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs, _______________ K.C.BHANU, J DECEMBER 13, 2011. YVL