IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH: HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FIRST (1ST) DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN Present: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.1159 of 2010 Between: Koyalkar Laxman … Petitioner And: The Government of A.P., rep. by its District Collector, Khammam & another … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.1159 of 2010 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the impugned order dated 25.11.2009 in CMA No.8 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kothagudem, wherein the said appeal filed by the respondents herein was disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible. 2. Heard both sides. Perused the record. 3. As seen from the impugned order, the said order was passed based on the consent of both sides. Hence, there cannot be any grievance for either of the parties over the said order and on that ground itself, the CRP is not maintainable. 4. However, it is stated that in the connected CRP No.799 of 2010, this Court by order dated 29.11.2010 gave liberty to the petitioner therein to move the lower appellate Court, if according to him the consent is wrongly recorded. In the said order, it was further directed that the trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of the suit expeditiously, preferably before the summer vacation, 2011. As the present CRP is also arising under similar circumstances and pertaining to the same issue that fall for consideration, it is considered that similar order can be passed in the present CRP also. 5. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is disposed of directing the trial Court to dispose of the suit expeditiously, preferably before summer vacation, 2011. At the same time, the petitioner is also granted liberty to move lower appellate Court as stated above. No order as to costs. ____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J Date: 01.02.2011 bss