( 1 ) S.A. No. 676/2009 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. SECOND APPEAL NO. 676 OF 2009 (Sow. Savita w/o. Sudhir Yermalkar & others Vs. Vishwanath s/o. Rangrao Shirsalle & others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................. Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. S.S. Choudhari, Advocate, for respondent nos.2 and 3. Mr. R.B. Deshmukh, Advocate, for respondent no.5 (Absent). Appeal abated as against respondent no.6 vide court's order dated 2-5-2009. Appeal dismissed as against respondent no.7 vide court's order dated 2-5-2009. .............................................................................. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 26TH MARCH 2010 1. Heard. 2. The appellant, subsequent purchaser of the property, feels aggrieved ( 2 ) S.A. No. 676/2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders by the decree of partition between his vendor and brother, confirmed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 92/2003 by the learned Additional District Judge, Nilanga, 3. It was in the first appellate court, the appellant approached against the decree and sought share in the property of his vendor, however, since there was no legal frame to such exercise, the first appellate court negated contentions of appellant. 4. On analyzing the judgment under challenge, I find, there is no error apparent on the part of both the courts. The status of the appellant being stranger to the family, a subsequent purchaser, he naturally will have independent recourse to adopt. ( 3 ) S.A. No. 676/2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders 5. I find no merit in the Second Appeal and it is accordingly dismissed. The order under challenge, however, is stayed till 26th July 2010. ( K.U. CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bgp/sa676