© c J'\°-o uw '§ il t^-' ^a;^ £^....^'^X. HIQtt COUR WRITPKHTIOS NQ.^ %S PETmQNER: ^^^ I'^'^'^L..^' Prakash Chsavd Verma,S/o Qailu Smgh Versaa, a^d'.ahoBt'46years; resiidenec; of vills^e and Post Saja, District Biirg, hattisgarh ^'M^ ..-•••'^(^.^ "•"^^^' "•^ ^ Respondsats /l. State Secretary SchQol Educafi.on Department Miaistry D.KJ CfahatttSRarh. ,OK' 2. BB-eetorof SehoolEdHcation QSeey^ O.K.S.Bfaawan,Raigw, Cfchattis^rb. 3- The- Bistfict Qffieer, Thro'-agh ^ Block DevetapHient E2dacatian Ofiteer, / WRrr PETITION UNDER A8TICLE 226/227 QI<1 TffE ;ONSTITUTieS Qip F&R &P WKT IH THE NATURE QF MANDAMUS. CE&TIQRASI, PROHIBmQN ANB'PQRTHEOTH^ SiMIIAR'W%TQR'WKTS..€>RE®B05 XI-HC-22 sn^Tqir R-fi'd 3T1^5T aiiiqigfer ./'\ Baive '^ '^' MI*IWTJ»>*irai 3^ '<<wicl'4, WTn'M'ls, Rldiuy 311^1 M?)ch .\^..f... **•• + *Vt »ttA-* * +^k ^»s*;*'»Av 200 R*< ail^-!! B'KllWtlfttf 2-7- Heard Shri O.P. Sahu. couns Govt. Advooate, for the State/respon<] The case of the petitioner since 18-10-85 and as perthe Instrut M.P. ttie Assistant Teachers examination on their own expenses] increments and order of Governmenl B.T.1. examination on his own oost ir| is Annexure-P/5, but the petitioner similariy situated persons have beer| orders ofthe Tribunal and t'nis Courtl Having heard learned coun: and oircumstances of the case, withi| case, the petitioner is atlowed to maf<i of this petition raising ali his grievanj days from today and in turn, the petitioner in the light of aveFmerjt in the representation also. If resp| similarly situated persons have t|s increments and the petitioner's increments on the basis of period of3 months from today, in ac^ With the direction aforesaid, Partles are entitled for certifi^d ma«e responpent ca^e Goverrlment's t>i<<I<i<fl-t *ii*iciT^'fei<il <Rf'tdi< ^iSrf^Tan^T tel for the petitioner and Shri Sumesh Bajaj, |lents, on advance copy. ^ that he is working as Assistant Teacher |;tions dated 24-12-98 issued by the State of (> have passed B.T.1., B.Ed. and M.Ed. lafter 22-10-64 are entitled for two advance is Annexure-P/1. The petitioner passed his the year 1994 and a certlficate to that effect has not been given the benefit whereas, granted h"o advance increments under the Ivide Annexure-P/6. ^] for the parties, having regard to the facts )ut expressing any opinion ofthe merit ofthe a detailed representation along 'A'ith copy j;es to respondent No.3 within a period of 15 No.3 is directed'to examine the ease of |ts made by the petitioner in this pet'tion and )ndent No.3 reaches to the conclusio'n that een granted the benefit of two advance e is also covered for grant of two advance order, then to pass orders within a sordance with !aw. :he petition stands disposed of. copy of this order. Sdf- ..C. Bf'SCiBO Judge (<<^y^r)