IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17901 of 2009 DR.MUKESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02 09.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 16.3.2009 dismissing him from service on grounds of his conviction in a criminal case. The order impugned is based on a judgment of the Supreme Court in 1995 (3) SCC 377 (DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION (ADMINISTRATION), MADRAS VERSUS S. NAGOOR MEERA) equivalent to A.I.R. 1995 (SC) 1364 (DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION (ADMINISTRATION), MADRAS VERSUS S. NAGOOR MEERA). This Court finds no infirmity in the impugned order, in view of the discussions contained in paragraph-9 of the judgment report in the A.I.R. version. Needless to state that, if circumstances so warrant after the disposal of the appeal the petitioner shall be entitled to be considered appropriately in accordance with law 2 notwithstanding Annexure-1. The writ application is dismissed. P.K. (Navin Sinha, J.)