IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39832 of 2009 1. Bhuar Quaraishi. 2. Shad Quraishi. Both sons of Kalam Quraishi, residents of Mohalla- Shad Jalal Pir, P.S. Sasaram(T), District- Rohtas......................................................................Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR......................................Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 23.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 307 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and ¾ of the Explosive Substance Act. Taking into consideration the fact that on account of a petty dispute the occurrence has taken place between agnates and the grievous injury was caused by petitioner no.1 but on seeing the facts of the case, no offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is made out, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody for about seven months, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge(F.T.C. 4), Rohtas in connection with Sasaram(T) P.S. Case No. 125 of 2009 arising out of Sessions Trial No. 189 of 2009 subject to the conditions (i)that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how 2 he is related with the petitioners, and (ii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. U.K. (Anjana Prakash,J)