^ HIOH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPOR w n 'f* sn AaQA/^nn? WV«a •JT«/i •l^^'a =T^<Uil=5'? Af^F^jF • PETITIONiBR Vs. RBSPOKDENTS Ravi Shaukar Agrawal, Son of Sfari Rajendra Kumar Agrawal, aged 23 years, resident of Aminpara, F'uraai Basti, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Pandit Ravi Shaaker Shulda Umversity, Through ifs Vice Chaacellor, G.E.Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) WEUT PBTITION UNDERARTICLE 226 PF THB COHSTITUTIOK QFramA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Safcish K. A©»iliobri,J.) Shri H.B.Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, couasel for fhe petitiouer. Shri Jitendia Pali, counsel for fhe respoiKlent. ^' 2. Q_R,D_BR (Passed oa this 11th S.sj ofOctotser, 2007} Leamed counsel appcatiag for the respoadent/Uiuversity submits fhat in fhe 3rd proviso of Sub-clause 2 of Clause 26 of Ordmance No.6 of the Uruversity, the petitioner ^ pemaitted to apply for revaluation ia two papers only. Accordingly, if fhe petitioner makes au appUcation for revaluation ia any two subjects/papers, the same wiU be allowed. In view of fhe foregoiag, learaed counsel for the petitioner, submits that nofhing survives in the petition. 3. Accordiagly, the petition is disposed of. f^^ Sa^^Ce ^/