IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.28924 of 2010 Between: C. Sridhar Reddy & others. ..... Petitioners AND Government of A.P., rep., by Collector, Chittoor District & others. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri J. Prabhakar Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.28924 of 2010 ORDER: In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioners is that respondent No.2 has not been disposing of their application for staying the operation of order dated 01.09.2007 of respondent No.3, whereby he has resumed the assigned lands admeasuring Ac.1.83 cents in Sy.No.126/4 of Durgasamudram Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Chittoor District. Sri J. Prabhakar, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that in view of certain reasons, which are not in the control of the petitioners, they could not file an appeal immediately against the order of respondent No.3 resuming the land. But, however, such an appeal was filed along with stay application with condonation of delay of 389 days in filing the appeal. He has submitted that respondent No.2 has not been disposing of the stay application and there is a threat of dispossession following the order of resumption passed by respondent No.3. In the light of the above submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 to dispose of the applications for condonation of delay and stay, if not already done within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.36859 of 2010 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ____________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 22.11.2010 ES