In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-8816 of 2009 (O&M) Gurbans Singh @ Gurbaksh Singh ..... Petitioner vs State of Punjab and another ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present Mr. AS Kalra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anter Singh Brar, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent no. 1. Mr. JBS Gill, Advocate, for respondent no. 2. Rajesh Bindal J. At the very outset learned counsel for the State pointed out that the petitioner has filed regular bail application before the court below which is pending, after notice to the State, for 1.10.2009. Considering the aforesaid fact, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. Before permitting the petitioner to withdraw the present petition I deem it appropriate to record about the conduct of the petitioner who has filed bail petition before this court and also before the court below. It has mentioned that no such or similar petition has earlier been filed in this Court or in the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Nothing specifically has been mentioned about the pendency of any bail application before the court below. The fact as to whether the petitioner had mentioned the factum of pendency of the present petition for regular bail before this court or not in the application for bail before the court below or there is concealment of fact shall be considered by the court below at the time of consideration of the prayer for bail. Dismissed as withdrawn. 24.9.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge