WP(C) 6439/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANIMA HAZARIKA Heard Mr. SC Biswas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. BJ Ghosh, learned State counsel. Considering the grievance raised and as agreed to by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at the motio n stage itself. Aggrieved by the inaction of the authority in not disposing the represen tation submitted by the petitioner, the instant writ petition has been filed wit h a prayer for a direction to respondent No.3 to dispose of the representations dated 12.10.2010 and 13.10.2010 so submitted by the petitioner. The petitioner’s case in brief is that the petitioner is the elected Pre sident of Gotabari Khapati Gaon Panchayat and is discharging her duties as such till date. The petitioner’s Gaon Panchayat is under Fekamari Development Block, which has been sanctioned an amount of Rs.2,43,653/- as first and second install ment under the TFC scheme for the year 2007-2008 in the name of Gotabari Khapati Gaon Panchayat vide common sanction order dated 08.03.2010 issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Dhubri Zilla Parishad. But even after 6(six) months from the date of its sanction the petitioner’s Gaon Panchayat did not receive the aforesa id sanctioned amount. The petitioner, therefore, submitted representation on 12. 10.2010 before the Deputy Commissioner, Dhubri informing about the non-receipt o f the aforesaid sanctioned amount by the Gaon Panchayat and prayed for a directi on for releasing the fund at an early date. The petitioner made another represen tation on 13.10.2010 before the Deputy Commissioner, Dhubri praying for causing an enquiry into the matter and till the finding of the enquiry, not to allow res pondent No.6 to leave the post of Secretary Gotabari Khapati Gaon Panchayat. But till date, no action has been taken to dispose of her representation. Finding n o other alternative, the petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to the respondent authority to dispose of the representations submitted by the pet itioner within a time frame. To the limited prayer so made by the petitioner, Mr. Ghosh, learned Stat e counsel has raised no objection. Considering the matter in its entirety and in view of the limited prayer so made by the petitioner, the respondent No. 3 i.e., the Deputy Commissioner, Dhubri is directed to dispose of the representations so submitted by the petitio ner within a period of 15(fifteen) days from the date of receipt of the certifie d copy of this order. The petitioner is also at liberty to submit fresh represen tation(s) along with a copy of the writ petition with the annexures appended the reto. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.