IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2011 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 27180 of 2011(V) --------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- KALIYATH MOHAMMED HAJI, AGED 71 YEARS S/O.KUNHALI, KALIYATH HOUSE, VELIANCODE PAZHANHI, VELIANCODE PANCHAYATH, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.MOHAMMED RAVUF RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUMPADAPPA-679 576. 2. KUTTIPPURATHEL BABU, S/O.KUTTAN, VELIANCODE, PAZHANHI, VELIANCODE PANCHAYATH PONNANI TALUK-679 579. 3. KUTTIPURATHEL THILAKAN, S/O.KUTTAN, DO. DO. -679 579. 4. KURUNGATTU SUNIL KUMAR, S/O.CHANGARU, DO. DO.-679 579. 5. CHEERAMBADATHEL SHIBU, S/O.KRISHNANKUTTY, DO. DO.-679 579. R1 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. M.K. ABOOBACKER R2 TO R5 BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 27180 of 2011(V) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL PRESCRIPTION. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL ACK.CARD. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JJ. ------------------------------- WP(C).NO. 27180 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose ,J. Party respondents 2 to 5 who are coconut pluckers seek time to file counter affidavit. Sri. K.K.Mohammed Ravuf learned counsel for the petitioner opposes granting further adjournment. He is justified in his objection. We notice that sufficiently long time was granted to the party respondents to file counter affidavit. Averments in the writ petition stands proved as against the party respondents by non traverse. We dispose of the writ petition directing the first respondent to grant effective and meaningful protection to the petitioner and all members of his family such as wife and children and others from threats from the part of party respondents and also for plucking coconut from his properties by engaging pluckers of his choice. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE pmn/ WP(C).27961/2011 2