1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 156 OF 2010 IN CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO. 10049 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5553 OF 2009 Gorakhnath S/o Somnath Punde .. Applicant Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO. 10049 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5553 OF 2009 Gorakhnath S/o Somnath Punde .. Applicant Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri V. M. Humbe, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri S. K. Kadam, A.G.P. for the Respondents No. 1 to 3. Shri P. S. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4. CORAM : A. P. DESHPANDE & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 08TH JANUARY, 2010. 2 ORAL ORDER [ PER A. P. DESHPANDE, J. ] : 1. The writ petition came to be dismissed by an order dated 15th January, 2009 on account of absence of the counsel for the petitioner. In the application it is stated that the advocate did not receive the cause list on the relevant date and hence could not remain present. For the reasons stated in the application the delay is condoned. The impugned order dismissing the petition in default is set aside. The writ petition is restored to file. Both the civil applications are allowed and disposed of. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ A. P. DESHPANDE, J.] bsb/Jan. 2010