StNGtE t^ Asr^l & IN TH®HI©HeC i^jQE':@HHATTI§@ARHAT BII.ASEHK WRn'E'ETITIQNfSINO. K OP 2010 PETmONER: .^y .^S€^ 'f^yi6:' // Baghat Rara Raj, ;Aged About- i55 Yeats, S/o- Late Sfari Gaja Lal, QiCcupatiQn- . Service- Head^^^M ^hQot, [ Block-Luiidra, [ Ainbikapur, • IDistt- Surgujafp.G.) 1 VERSUS ii'llliffi'l'm?: ,,.^5€^'':'^ ,:^€:v :^RESPiNEi@S@:&.':::StateE^ ':::^:^l::^;;'(''I'^ugh,' •JE)eparfment'',' :;Qf'g'.SfiliOQl JI'EdyGation.,-:.:, :-'.^s^/O.K.'S.; Elfaa.wan, Raipur(C.(i.) ^; Director, ] Directorate! of ^.<:^ok . Shijksh^,^.';Ra|EgjT.ir ;:^.^). ?' ^3. I^triGtEduca^ ^•.;^-^;;,aa^%a^:r,7,: .^,i';^^ '::?!':'i!;:;':'-;'^l:;';t^^ 4i:iliijii •'•4Sl]Sst '?•!'] lli';M: -ilffil III ^1}:II' :>iiti''!: '5:5T'<ii<ild<i, yTily'is, f^cll'y^ ..V:..(B..w.,(MB:....6s^Z^ a^?TTI^? (yil^i'i'?) sni^i^iil^fw ^t^ 5fT1^T !b*ii^i TOiiw^ftaan^i <.' »_:HON'BLE MR. JUSTECE PRITlNKERDIWAKER 15._11.2010 Shri Vinay pandey, counsel fc( Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. forti( aftdr Grievance of the petitioner in service record, his date of joining h^s whereas he has iomed his services submitted that on 8.2.2010, the Dj District Education Officer to examint pass necessary order but till date no| Counsel for the petitioner SL serye if direction is issued to t'1'1 representation within the tiine fram^. State counsel submits that representation to the resp. N0.3 aft^r resp. No. 2 and the same would pcssible. Accordingly, the petition is dj petitioner to make a fresh represent^t: ;iving a copy of the same to resp. Np from the date ot receipt of copy respondent No.3 will decide the s4; preferably within a period of three nli The respondent No.2 is also directecj order. It is made ciear that this Coij on merits of the case atid the autho) to decide the same strictiy in accord^ Ithe present petition is that in his ts been mentioned as' 19.10.1984 bn 6.3.1979. It has been further \f. Director has also directed the fc the case of the petitioner and to thing has been done. fcmits that ends of iustice would le reso. N0.3 for deciding his ctt|<l[?f41l +1H<rff ^F ?^V\ <Fai^l< ^affirasn^T ~ the petitioner. .e State/respondents. let the petitioner make a fresh giwng a copy of the same to the be decided as expeditiousiy as N)3 sposed of with a direction to the ition to the respondent No.3 after i.2 within a period of one month of this order and in tum the me as expeditiously a.s possibie onths from the date of its receipt. to ensure the compliance .of this rt has not expressed any opinion ity concemed would be at liberty ince with iaw; Sd/- Pritmker Diwakar Judge