1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 4474 OF 2007 (Smt. Rahatbee Shaikh Ahmed Khan .v. Smt. Kalpana Shripad Pathak) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri N.A. Lapalikar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.M. Ghare, Advocate for the respondent No.2. CORAM : R.V. MORE, J. 03RD JUNE, 2008. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. By the impugned order, the application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff seeking her re-examination for exhibiting the documents which were marked as Articles `C', `D' and `E' came to be rejected. The trial Court rejected the petitioner's application by making observation that evidenciary value of the above said documents can be considered at the time of final hearing, though the documents are marked as Articles. In view of the above observation of the trial Court, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of my jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition is dismissed. JUDGE