IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10767 of 2005 ANIL YADAV @ ANIL KR.YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 4 30.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of the finding recorded by the enquiry officer, the disciplinary authority have taken a mild view of the matter and passed the order of withholding of salary from the period 20.3.2000 to 28.10.2004 when admittedly the petitioner was absent for 1682 days. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his absence was totally beyond his control because he was falsely implicated in a case in which he ultimately came to be acquitted. This is no defence for the petitioner as he ought to have informed the authority about the development. Even otherwise the petitioner has got very mild punishment. This writ application has no merit and it is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)