IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 22331 of 2008 Between: 1 Immadi Shobha Rani @ Shobha Rani W/o. Sri Mahender R/o. Veldanda Village, Mandal Narmetta, District Warangal. 2 Chiluveru Lingamu S/o. Agaiah R/o. Tharigoppula-1 Village, Narmetta Mandal, District Warangal. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Narmetta Mandal, Narmetta, Warangal District. 2 Revenue Divisional Officer, Jangaon, Warangal District, A.P. 3 Kompally Ramesh S/o. Mysaiah R/o. Machupahad (V) and Mandal Narmetta, Warangal District. 4 Mudavath Sampath, S/o. Anjya R/o. Tharigoppula- 2 Village, Mandal Narmetta, Warangal District. 5 Boragoni Prabhakar, S/o. Kakaiah R/o. Solipuram (V), Mandal Narmetta, Warangal District. 6 Byragoni Uma Rani W/o. Venu R/o. Hanmanthpur (V), Mandal Narmetta, Warangal District. 7 Byragoni Surender S/o. Bnalaraju R/o. Ammapuram (V), Mandal Narmetta, Warangal District. 8 Bukya Dev Naik, S/o. Manktya R/o. Village Bottallaparre, Mandal Narmetta, Warangal District. 9 Korre Sreenu S/o. Chandru R/o. Village Abdul Nagaram, Mandal Narmetta, Warangal District. 10 Maloth Rukkamma W/o. Hari Chandru R/o. Narmetta-2, Mandal Narmetta, Warangal District. 11 Nagapuri Padma W/o. Bhasker R/o. Ankushapur, Mandal Narmetta, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or order or direction preferably in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned notices dated 27-09-2008 bearing Rc.Nos.1510/2008, 1512/2008, convening the meeting of the Mandal Praja Parishad of Narmetta Mandal, District Warangal at Jangaon, by the 2nd respondent in respect of Proposed No Conﬁdence Motion against the petitioners, on 15-10-2008 as null and void by setting aside the same and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MANIK RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following Order: Petitioners 1 and 2 are the President and Vice- President respectively of Narmetta Mandal Parishad. Respondents 3 to 11 have initiated steps to move a motion of no conﬁdence against the petitioners. They delivered a notice dated 20-09-2008 to the second respondent together with a proposed motion of no conﬁdence. After veriﬁcation of the record, the second respondent issued notices in Form-V proposing to convene the meeting of the Mandal Parisahd on 15-10-2008 to take up the motions of no conﬁdence against the petitioners. The said proceedings are challenged. The petitioners contend that in the motion of no conﬁdence, baseless and defamatory allegations are made against the ﬁrst petitioner and the same is politically motivated. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that respondents 3 to 11 have misused the process of law and are aiming at defaming the petitioners. He submits that respondents 1 and 2 ought to have examined the matter before issuing notice in Form-V. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Sri G.Elisha, learned standing counsel for the first respondent. The grounds on which this Court can interfere with the steps for moving a motion of no conﬁdence against elected representatives are very limited. It is only when any procedural defect is noticed, this Court would interfere, that too, by issuing necessary directions for rectiﬁcation of the same. In the instant case, the petitioners are not able to point out the procedural defects in the respective notices. Their grievance is mostly about the content of the proposed resolution. Neither this Court nor any authority can compel the persons who intend to move the motion of no conﬁdence to modify the allegations or the basis. In case, the petitioners are of the view that the allegations made against them are baseless, it shall always be open to them to take appropriate steps in accordance with law. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:14-10-2008 usd To 1 The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Narmetta Mandal, Narmetta, Warangal District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Jangaon, Warangal District, A.P. 3 Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT). 4 Two CD copies.