COCP No. 1517of 2009 1 In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … COCP No. 1517of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: October 15, 2009 Krishna Grover .. Petitioner Versus Subhash Yadav, S.P. ..Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Ms. Anju Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ashok Jindal, Addl.A.G.Haryana for the respondent. .. Rakesh Kumar Garg,J(Oral) In response to the show cause notice issued by this court, reply by way of an affidavit of Shri Subhash Yadav, IPS Superintendent of Police, Sirsa has been filed wherein it has been stated as under:- “That the matter was ordered to be inquired through D.S.P. City, Sirsa within stipulated period. Inquiry in this regard was conducted by the D.S.P. City Sirsa. During the inquiry, statements of both the parties were recorded by D.S.P. The complainant and her companions narrated the facts regarding quarrel with the opposite party Kamlesh Rani. Kamlesh Rani and her companions opposed the version of Krishna Grover-complainant. The inquiry was conducted by the officials of A.D.C. Office as well as Mini Secretariat and it came to light that there was some quarrel between Krishna Grover and Kamlesh Rani in connection with indulgence of Ration Depot Holders but the other facts of the complainant regarding tried to throw out from the building to the complainant was found to be false. It is relevant to mention here COCP No. 1517of 2009 2 that with regards to the quarrel between the complainant and Kamlesh Rani, a Rapat No. 8 dated 12.5.2009 was recorded and the same was sent to the court of Executive Magistrate, Sirsa for information and necessary action in the matter. In this manner, no cognizable offence was committed to be fond. D.S.P. City Sirsa sent his report to this office vide his memo. No. 227-R/DSP dated 24.6.2009, which was accordingly finalized. In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the respondent, I am not inclined to proceed further in this petition. Rule discharged. However, the respondent is directed to supply a copy of the inquiry report to the petitioner within two weeks from today. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the aforesaid inquiry report in accordance with law. October 15, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE