:^ iS^^^^S^S^^^^^^SSSi^^^S^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT^B-A^UR WRIT PETITION {C} NO...&S..13.../2006 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Anil Du^al, S/o Shri B.P.Duggal,. aged about 40 years, R/o Kharsiya Road, Ambikapur, Di§tt.- Sarguja, C.G. VERSUS 'v' 1 Regional Transport Authority,, ^EDrco% ^hhatti8garhatRaipur-^ ^^•lr 2 Secretary, Regional Transport ^l'to A. 0. •tuf'>" "' Authority, Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 tiiHcirsbw^ 3^'x(wifi<i, »xfl<i<i<o, («icii<a^< ..yAfe.)...^.l?/0^^ 200 sn^r'ra^T ('i?l'd8"<?r) SH^T ?)T f^IRi (RTati^rgiiiRi I" 1.^ f^ B^ITWfll^TSn^T 24.11.2006 A^lvocate forthe petitroner. Governrhent Advocate for ttie State. Shri Anshul Shrivastava, Shri Sushil Dubey, Heard. The petitioner has respondent No.1 be directed to for grant of regular stage camag< Kotadot via Kattiaolia.Kelhari, The petitioner applied for| 18.10.2006, but respondent No\ appiication. The prayer made by respondent No.1 may be direct^ petitioner in accordance with Advocate for the State has no obj^ Having heard learned the facts and circumstances of th]e consider the application of the carriage permit on the above rout^ of two months from the date of With the direcUon aforesaic), Consequently, M.(W.)P. stand disposed of. Certified copy ofthis order |is per rule. Wlfe^T WRTT fffec^ rf^RTC ^ari^iTsn^r preferr^d thiswrit petition with a prayer that cij>nsider the appticaUon ofthe petitioner permit on the route Manendragarh to Jar^akpur and return. regular permit on the said route on j1 is not considering the petitioner's f learhed counsel for the petitioner is that ?d to consider the application of the |law, to which leamed Government ^ction. coun|sel for the parties and having regard to h|e case, respondent No.1 is directed to Ipetitioner for grant of regular stage in accordance with law wittiin a period recjeipt of copy of this order. j, the petition stands disposed of. to.4761/06 & I.A. No.11106/06 also P.T.O.