IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34875 of 2011 Manish Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar 3. 09.11.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 387 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that from mobile the informant received extortion call when Rs. 50,000/- was demanded. Subsequently, alleged mobile was recovered from one Om Prakash. The name of the petitioner sprang up on the statement of Om Prakash. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that father of this petitioner was witness no.1 of seizure of mobile which was recovered from Om Prakash as gets reflected from the seizure list as contained in Annexure-2 and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Moreover, from accusation levelled no case under Section 387 of the I.P.C. is made out. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on 2 bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case No. 32 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Begusarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)