IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21080 of 2009 Bhusan Mahto, Son of Late Ram Mahto, Resident of village- Jeanbigha, P.S.-Shekhpura, District-Shekhpura. ………….Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar. ………..Respondents. ----------- 2/ 25.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though petitioner has been shown among one who forced the informant to come to the house where marriage was solemnized. According to the learned counsel, marriage was an arrange marriage. Due to insufficiency of gift or dowry this case lodged, making false allegation and petitioner is apprehending his arrest while wife and husband are residing together. In my view, allegation made above does not justify petitioner’s refusal of bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nawada, in connection with Kashichak P.S. Case No. 6/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. Sanjeet/ (Mandhata Singh, J.)