CLCON No.254 of 2011 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Shri Ganesh Kandpal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Dinesh Gahtori, learned Standing Counsel for the State/ respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This Court vide order dated 18.04.2011, directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for her appointment on the post of Shiksha Mitra/ Shiksha Bandhu, if she is otherwise eligible to be appointed as such, in pursuance of the letter dated 06.10.2010. The respondents have filed the affidavit of compliance in which they have annexed the order-dated 09.08.2011, by which the case of the petitioner was considered and was rejected. Since the respondent no.1 has passed an order rejecting the claim of the petitioner, the present contempt petition has rendered infructuous and is dismissed. Contempt notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that liberty may be given to the petitioner for challenging the order passed by the respondent no.1. No such liberty can be granted in the contempt petition. It is always open for the petitioner to challenge the same before the appropriate forum. ( V.K. Bist , J.) Arpan 14.11.2011