HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5095 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioner challenges the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in according permission in favour of the respondents 3 to 6 for construction of a building known as Bhagyalaxmi Commercial Complex in premises bearing No.21-2-121 to 130, 131, 131/1 to 6, Gulzar House, Hyderabad. He contends that challenging the permission accorded to the respondents 3 to 6 and some others, he filed O.S. No.5011 of 1992 in the Court of the II Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad for various reliefs and that the suit has been decreed on 17-12-2005. One of the reliefs is said to be directions to the respondents 1 and 2 to demolish the construction so made. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents 1 and 2 have not taken any steps so far. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned counsel for the respondents 3 to 6. 3. The petitioner had approached the Civil Court by filing O.S No.5011 of 1992, claiming the reliefs of declaration that the permission accorded for construction of the building is untenable and a mandatory injunction be issued to respondents 1 and 2 to demolish the building so constructed. The suit was decreed on 17-12-2005. It is brought to the notice of this Court that A.S. No.112 of 2007 was filed against the decree before the Court of the III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and the operation of the decree was stayed. The Municipal Corporation is also said to have filed an independent appeal. In addition to that the petitioner has already filed E.P. No.223 of 2006. In this background, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. 4. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J March 17, 2011. KTL