IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.4933/2008 Decided on:4.8.2010 _____________________________________________ Kamal Netar. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner is seeking taking over of his service by the respondent-State. It has come in the reply that it is a case of up- gradation of the existing school and not taking over of any institution. Consequently, no direction can be issued to the respondent-State to take over the services of the petitioner. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 4.8.2010*awasthi* 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?