IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 494 of 2011 Reserved on: 25.2.2011 Date of decision: 03.03.2011. ------------------------------------------------- The Executive Engineer. Petitioners. Versus Manohar Lal. Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, J. For the petitioners: Mr. R.K.Bawa, A.G.with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.Advocate General. For the respondent: None. Per V.K.Ahuja,J. This Civil Writ Petition under Article 226/227 has been filed by the State against the award of the learned Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala in reference No. 48 of 2006, dated 20.07.2010. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. In so far as the order passed by the learned Tribunal is concerned, since there is no order for payment of back-wages, the order can be said to be correct, since the finding based on violation of Sections 25-G and 25-H are based on evidence available on record. There arises no question of reappraisal of evidence under Article 227 2 of the Constitution of India. The view of the Tribunal is reasonable. However, in so far as the order passed regarding continuity in service and seniority from his termination is concerned, the said order does not call for any interference by this Court since denying him continuity in service and seniority from the date of his termination will cause prejudice to the respondent and as such the same order calls for no interference by this Court. There is no merit in the writ petition filed by the petitioner and the same is dismissed accordingly. No notice was issued to the respondent since no order prejudicial to his interest is being proposed to be passed by this Court. 3. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice 3rd March, 2011 ( Justice V.K. Ahuja ) (krt) Judge 3