THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3150 of 2009 ORDER: The second petitioner is the wife of the first petitioner. They own an extent of Acs.13.35 cents and Acs.6.25 cents of land in survey No.366/1 of Chinnatekuru Village, Kalluru Mandal, Kurnool District. The total extent of survey number is said to be Acs.26.96 cents, and one Smt.Hazeera Bee and Huzura Bee are said to be the owners of balance of Acs.7.36 cents of land. It is stated that the extent owned by the petitioners was acquired by the Government for Irrigation Project. The petitioners submitted an application to respondents 2 and 3, with a request to survey the land and fix the boundaries. It is stated that no action has been taken on the application. Hence, the petitioners filed W.P.No.24280 of 2007. The writ petition was closed, on 24.06.2008, on a representation made by the respondents that a survey was conducted on 17.05.2007. The petitioners submitted a copy of the report and preferred an appeal before the first respondent. Obviously, on the directions issued by the first respondent, the second respondent carried out the survey, for the second time, on 21.08.2007. The report thereof was furnished to the petitioners. Their grievance is that sub- division of this survey number was not effected to the extent of their lands and that the map and sketch of survey conducted on 21.08.2007 was not furnished to them. They seek a direction to the respondents to fix the survey stones, and furnish a copy of the map. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. The petitioners are not the owners of the land in the entire survey No.366/1, which measures Acs.29.26 cents. Further, a part of their land was acquired by the Government. Obviously, with a view to obtain certain information about the remaining part of their land, the petitioners made an effort to get the land surveyed. Not being satisfied with the survey that was conducted on 17.05.2007, they carried the matter in appeal, and in pursuance of the direction therein, survey was conducted for the second time by the second respondent on 21.08.2007. The grievance of the petitioners is two-fold, viz., that the respondents did not sub-divide the survey number, and that the copy of the sketch of survey conducted on 21.08.2007, was not furnished. So far as the first part of the grievance of the petitioners is concerned, it can not at all fit into the application filed for survey of the land. A survey at the instance of the owner of the land can be made only as per the existing survey numbers or sub-divisions. The survey number cannot be sub-divided through this process. Therefore, no relief can be granted to the petitioners, in this regard. As regards the grievance of the petitioners about the non-furnishing of the copy of sketch, the respondents cannot deny the same to the petitioners. Furnishing of a sketch, prepared during the course of survey, which is conducted at the instance of the petitioners, would certainly be of immense help to them to know various aspects pertaining to their land. The sketch is not a classified document. On the other hand, it is the result of survey conducted at the instance of the petitioners. At a time when a citizen can seek information even about a thing, which is of no concern to him, the request made by the petitioners for furnishing of the sketch, cannot be said to be un-related. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondents 2 and 3 to furnish the sketch prepared during the course of survey conducted on 21.08.2007, to the petitioners. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J. Dated:18.02.2009 GJ