^ CT ^)/3r<^/ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (S) NO^/^-' 2011 PETITIONERS 'Y ^•'^^(' (^-A.^.S^/ ^w .<5< ^ <fr / .- ^' RESPONDENTS 1. Lekharam Sahu, S/o. Late Udaylal Sahu Age 57 years, Presently posted as Revenue Inspector, at Tahsil Office District-Rajanandgaon (CG) 2. Tikamlal Shrivastava, S/o. late Dashrath Lal Shrivastava, Age 57 years, Presently working as Revenue Inspector at Land Record Branch, District-Rajanandgaon (CG) 3. Vichar Das Sahu, S/o. Shri Bunudas Sahu, Age 58 years, Presently working as Revenue Inspector at Nazul Branch, District-Rajanandgaon (CG) l/-' 4. Chintamani Mishra, S/o. Shri Jagdish Prasad Mishra, Age 55 years, Presently working as Revenue Inspector at Diversion Branch, District-Rajanandgaon (CG) 5. Yusuf Khan, S/o. Late Sakur Khsai, Age 57 years, Presently working as Revenue Inspector at Tahsil Office, District-Rajanandgaon (CG) Versus ^"' State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) The Director (Land Records), Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner, O/o. the Commissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, District-Rajnandgaon (CG) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COIJRT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BIT.A8PTJR WRTT PETmON (-8) No. 5150 of2011 Lekharam Sahu & Othere. VRRSIJS State ofCtihattissaA & O&ers. RESPONDENTS A.^3lL WRIT PEimON TJNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTm.mON OF WD1A SB: Hon'MeShri Satish K. Agnih»tri,.T, Shri Shashank Thakur. Advocate fwthe netitioners. ihri V.V.S. Moorihy, Deputy Advouale General for the State/respoadents. Shri S.P. Navratna, Dy. Conanissioner (R), Bilaspur, is pressiil. QRDER (ORAD (Passed on 06a day ofSeptember, 201 1) 1. At the verv outset. Shri Moorthv. teamed counsel appeariag for die State/respondeKts, on instnictions, submits that the order dated 18.08.2011 (Aimexiu-e P/l) iropugned herein, has not beenpRssedby a competsnt anthority in accordance with Rule 20, Part IL of the Madhya Pradesb/Chhattisgaili Land Record ManuaL thus, the same is unsustainable in law and shall not be given effect to. 2. In view of the above submission made by leamed State counsel, according to teamed coiuisel for the petitioners, notlring siirvives for adjudicafion at this stoee. 3. Accordmgly, the impugned order dated 18.08.2011 (Anaexure P/l) is quashed. However, liberty is reserved to the State/responderts to pass aonropriate order, if so advised. in accordaace with law. in admmistrative erigency and in piiblic iaterest. 4. The writ petition is allowed. No order asto coste. ...^.^^Qw ". jud&e