1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10897 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6669 OF 2008 Balkrishna s/o Madhavrao Dhopeshwarkar ... APPLICANT VERSUS Deogiri Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. & ors. . ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri R.K. Hingole, Advocate holding for Shri S.P. Deshmukh, Advocate for the applicant Shri R.H. Bhanuse, Advocate holding for Shri S.V. Gangapurwala, Advocate for R.Nos.3, 4, 8 to 19 ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATED : 25th November, 2009. ORAL ORDER : 1. Perused. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The applicant (original petitioner) has preferred the present application, requesting to re-issue notice of Writ Petition No.6669/2008 upon respondent No.5 on the fresh address given in paragraph No.3 of the present application. 2 3. It is pointed out that the earlier notice sent to respondent No.5 was returned unserved with the remark that she is not residing on the given address. Hence, petitioner made efforts and searched the address of respondent No.5 which is mentioned in paragraph No.3 of the present application and hence, requested that the notice be re-issued on the respondent No.5 on the said fresh address. 4. Considering the averments in the application, present application is required to be allowed in the interest of justice and same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) thereof and registry is directed to re-issue notice of Writ Petition No.6669/2008 upon respondent No.5 on the fresh address given in paragraph No.3 of the present application. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) fmp/ca10897.09