1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION k WRIT PETITION NO.4302 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr. Vaibhav A.Sugdare for the petitioner. Mr. V.D. Patil, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr. Sagar Kamble i/b Mr. P.G. Lad for respondent no.4. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 30/11/2011. PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. The principal prayer in the writ petition reads thus: “Kindly issue Writ of Certiorari and or any other appropriate Writ in the like nature thereby quash and set aside Clause 7 of impugned Circular dated 5.11.2009 issued by Respondent no.1 (Annexure ‘I’)”. 2 Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in a group Writ Petitions being Writ Petition Nos. 2136 of 2011 and 14 other Petitions, similar challenge was made by the Petitioners and Aurangabad Bench of this Court vide judgment and order dated 25th August, 2011 allowed the Petitions holding that condition no.7 in Government Circular dated 5th November, 2009 is unreasonable and, therefore, struck it of. In view thereof, learned counsel for the Petitioner does not press this Writ Petition and seeks liberty to the Petitioner to make representation to Respondent no.4 - MHADA for seeking appointment order pursuant to her selection as Junior Engineer (Diploma Holder) inviting attention of the concerned authority to the aforementioned judgment passed in a group of 15 writ petitions. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. At this stage Mr. Patil, learned 3 Government Pleader submits that the State proposes to carry the judgment passed in the aforementioned group of 15 writ petitions to the Supreme Court. In view thereof, if the Petitioner’s appointment is made, it would be subject to the orders that will be passed by the Supreme Court in the Special Leave Petitions that the State Government proposes to file. ( K.K. TATED, J) (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)