IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32342 of 2009 MUKESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 03/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is neither named in the F.I.R. nor put on T.I.P. It is stated that he was named by one co-accused Raj Kumar Singh on the basis of which he was arrested and he is in jail since 13.2.2009. It is stated that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and a co-accused under similar circumstances who was also named by said Raj Kumar Singh in his confessional statement, has been allowed bail by this Court by order dated 27.8.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. Case No. 23265 of 2009. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this application is allowed. Let petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, in connection with Railway Raxaul P.S. Case No. 5 of 2009 with conditions as laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the 2 petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. S.Ali (J.N. Singh, J.)