C.R. No.1814 of 2004 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No.1814 of 2004 (O&M) Date of Decision:05.05.2009 Gurmeet Singh and another .......Petitioners Versus M/s Walia Brothers etc. ....Respondents Present: None for the petitioners. Ms. Rachna Arora, Advocate for Mr. Amar Vivek, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. There is no representation for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. The revision is against an order granting leave to defend for a tenant in a petition filed by the landlord for eviction under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that the trial was also taken up on the basis of issues raised in the statement filed by the tenant and the matter now stands before the Rent Controller after arguments in the case for judgment after 09.05.2009. Having regard to the progress of the trial on the basis of the statement of learned counsel for the respondent, there shall be no need for entering into the C.R. No.1814 of 2004 (O&M) -2- dispute whether the leave should have been granted or not. 3. Civil revision petition is dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE May 05, 2009 Pankaj*