IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 14584 of 2009 Between: Mrs. Fazalunnisa Begum W/o.Sri Alhaj Ali Ahmed, r/o. Somajiguda, Hyderabad, Presently R/o. 10210, Silver Bell Terrace Rock Villae, Marina Land USA-20850 Rep.by her GPA Holder Mr.Khadeer Mohd.Khan S/o.Late Ahmed Khan, 70 yrs, Business, C/o.507, Mahaveer House Basheer Bazar, Hyderabad-500 029 .... PETITIONER AND The Commissioner and Special Officer Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Behind Tank Bund, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus calling for the records in respect of Permit No. 111/44 dt.20-7-2006 in File No. 833/CSC/TP-5/2005 issued by the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Hyderabad and District the Respondent Corporation to extend the period and sanction by atleast another two years, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR.K.PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent: SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 14584 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petitiion is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondent-Commissioner & Special Officer, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad in not considering the request of the petitioner for extension of the building permission dated 20.7.2006 granted to her, vide Permit No.111/44 of 2006 by two more years. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitoner as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-Corporation. The material on record shows that the petitioner made an application before the respondent herein requesting to extend the permit for another two years and the same was received in the office of the respondent on 02.7.2009. In the circumstances, the respondent is bound to consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In the circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to the entitlement of the petitioner for the extension of the permit as sought by her, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 2.7.2009 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, there shall be a direction to the respondent not to interfere with the construction work in progress, as per the permit No.111/44 of 2006, provided the same is in accordance with the sanction plan. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. _____________ G.ROHINI, J 22nd July 2009 RAR THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 14584 of 2009 DATED : 22-07-2009