IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 27473 of 2007 Between: P.Bheeshmudu S/o.Venkateswarlu R/o.Plot No.60, At Madinaguda village Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.District Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Dy.Commissioner , Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Serilingampally N Zone, Circle-II Chandanagar, R.R.District, Hyderabad 2 Zonal Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation West Zone, Serilingampally, Municipal Area R.R.District, Hyderabad 3 Asst.City Planner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, West zone, Serilingampally , Municipal Area R.R.District Hyderabad 4 The Secretary to the Government of Andhra pradesh dept of Municipal Administration, Secretariat, Hyderabad 5 R.K.Mandal S/o.Not known Plot No.93, part, Sy.No.204/2, Dynamic officers colony, Madeenaguda, Serilingampally Mandal R.R.District, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1to 3 in sending his squade on 6.12.2007 to demolish the temporary shelter in plot No.93/C, admeasuring 54.sq.yards at Dynamic officers colony, Madeenaguda village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.District and ilegal,interfere with the possession of petitioner and threatening the petitioner to demolish the said temporary shelter immediately without any notice to the petitioner and without following any due process of law is illegal, improper and violation of fundamental rights of the petitioner consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 not to demolish the temporary shelter i,e room of the petitioner in plot No.93/C admeasuring 54. sq.yards at Dynamic colony, Madeenaguda vilalge, Serilingampally, Mandal, R.R.District Hyderabad without any notice and without following the due process of law Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.N.SAIDA RAO Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE Counsel for Respondent No.4: Government Pleader for Municipal Administration The Court made the following : ORDER: Sri Kamalakar Rao representing Sri N. Saida Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. R. SUBHASH REDDY, J 01-05-2009 ks/ktl