1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 1039 of 2011 Wasudeo v. State of Maharashtra and anr -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr P.P. Kotwal, Advocate for petitioner Coram: D.D. Sinha and A. P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 28th February 2011 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Grievance of the petitioner is in respect of interview process initiated by the respondents in the month of September 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though the petitioner was otherwise qualified, was not called for interview. 2. In the instant case, it is not in dispute that the concerned interviews were scheduled in the month of September 2010 and the interview process is over. In that view of the matter, there is no case made out for showing indulgence. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE joshi 2