IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 1191 of 2006 Between: N. Venkateswarlu S/o. Narayana, (Operations) Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy Circle South, A.P. Central Power Distribution Company Ltd., and working on deputation in office of Divisional Engineer (O) Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District, ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P. Central Power Distribution Company Ltd., Rep. by Divisional Engineer (Operations), Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District, 2 The Assistant Divisional Engineer, (Operations) Shamshabad, Shamshabad, Ranga Reddy District, 3 Housing Development Finance Corporation, Kothapet Branch, Chitanyapuri, Ranga Reddy District, .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 1st Respondent in not paying the (1) Salary due and payable for the month September, 2005 and onwards (2) Subsistence allowance due and payable for the period 22-11-2004 to 17-3-2005 (3) Salary from 1-9- 2004 to 25-9-2004 and 26-7-2004 to 31-7-2004, as arbitrary, malafide and illegal, and consequently direct the 1st Respondent (1) to pay the salary of the petitioner from the month September, 2005 and onwards and continue to pay every month regularly as per entitlement (2) to pay the subsistence allowance due and payable to the petitioner for the period 22-11-2004 to 17-3-2005 (3) to pay the salary of the petitioner for the periods 1-9-2004 to 25-9-2004 and 26-7-2004 to 31-7-2004 and to pass such other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.S.K.V.RAMANAMURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.: P.R.BALARAMI REDDY(SC FOR AP TRANSCO) The Court made the following : ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner states that an enquiry is pending against the petitioner. Therefore, any orders passed in this writ petition may not have any relevance, unless the enquiry itself is completed. Therefore, the writ petition is closed and the rights of the petitioner will be subject to result of the enquiry. The subsistence allowance due to the petitioner shall be paid to him, as per his entitlement, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. __________ 17-09-2008 rkk