^.^^^^ ^. ^ • COURT OF : %^^®>. WRjTPETiTIONNQ._432&OF2Q04 2. 3. M/s Sarvamang!a Construction Company, through Proprietor Rajkumar Agrawa!, S/o ChotelaS AgrawaS, R/o 106, T.P. Nagar, Korba, Tahsll and Dlstnct Korba (Chhattisgarh). Versus State of Chh^ttisQarh, through Secretary. Department of Transport, DX-S. Bhawars, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). Regionaj Transport Officer, Raipur (Chhattlsgas-h). Reglonaj Manager, S.E.C.L., Korba and Gevra' Area, Dlstrict Korba (Chhattlsgarh). (Writ petition uncier Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AgnihoSri, J. : Shri N.L. Sonl, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panei Lawyer for the State/ respondents NoJ & 2. Dr. N.K. Shukia, Sr. Advocate with S'nri A.K. Yadav. counsei for respondent No.3. ORAL GRDER (Passed on this 4th day of September, 2008) L.earned counsel appearing for the siibmlts that In view of the and order 6 Juiy, 2006 by this Court in the of Kumar vs. of Chhattisgarh & Others (>tA?',.p.No.944/2006) and in other connected wnt petltions nothing sun/ives in this petjtioner and the has become infructuous, to which iearned coi/insel for the respondents have no objectlon. 2) AccordingSy, the writ petition js dismissed as havjng become jnfructuous» 3) Consequentiy, interim order passed eariier stands discharged and the pending applications, If any, aiso stand cjlsposed of. Sd/- Govyrj Satish K. Agnihotri Judge