PETITIONER RESPONDENT WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER : As stated above. @ x¢f§1§ie Eenc?i W IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHI-IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. NO.4G45 /2004 /Rajesh Chhedavi , S/o. R.S. Chhedavi , aged about 21 years, R/o. Adarsh nagar Behind Police Line Kawardha, Tahsil- Kawardha, Dist. Kawardha, Chhattisgarh r VERSUS 3/1”. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Depaitment of GAD D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) . Secretary Land Record , (C.G.) Deputy Collector Kabirdham Collector (Land Records ) Kabirdham Pitamber S/o Dashrath Mandavi R/o Village Sari Post Udiya Kurd Tah Kawardha Dist. Kahirdham . Ramesh Kumar S/o Kishan Dhruve, Govt. Post Metric Aadivasi Block Chhatrawas 3 Kawardha Dist. Kabirdham . Nanku Ram S/o Bir Singh Maravi ,/" (Baiga) R/o Village Damgarh Post Kukdur Tah y. Pandariya Dist. Kabirdham HIUrI COURT OF QHHATHSGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 4649 of 2004 PETTHONER : Rajesh Chhedavi. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIIPETI’HON UNDER AR l 1CLE 226J227 OF TEE CONSTITUI‘ION OF INDIA W SB: Hml’bie Shri Satish K. A nihotri J. Present: Smt. Renu Kochar, Advocate for ihe petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the Stam (Passed W;L 2010) 1. The petitioner questions the legality and vaiidity of the order 08.11.2004 (Annexure P/l) on the gound that the less qualified persons have been appointed iguoring the claim ofthe petitioner on the post Patwati. O 2. The impugned order was passed on 8/9.11.2004 (Annexure P/l). petitioner has preferred this writ petition on 27. 1 1 .2004. The matter hsted for hearing on 10.02.2005. None appeared in the first round, thereaiter, in the second round also, none appeared on behalf of petitioner. However. the matter was adjourned. Thereaiter, the petitioner has not taken any steps tiH date. Now this petition has become infructuous on a siinpie ground that the candidates appointed NoYember, 2004 must have completed their training and after that they musthave been appointed at various places and further must have been confirmed on their respective posts aiter completion of probation period. Thus, at this stage, for want of default on the part of the petitioner, the appointment of other candidates cannot be set aside on any other ground, whatsoever. i e 3. Accordingly, the petition having become inti'uctuous, is dismissed. Consequentiy, M(W)P No. /// $12M“ saw