63W IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURI‘ OE CHHATTISGARH AT BIL PUR (C.G. ,// WRIT PETITION NUMBER ‘ A‘Egg 2003./ EETITIONER : D;11p shukla son of Mr. Ambika Prasad Shukla aged about 31 years’ Resument of é’ Bipaspur . District. Bilaspur (C.G.) Behind Telephone Exchange Telipa’ra; VERSUS RESPONDENTS r 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : Its Chief Secretrary D.K.S. Bhawan. Mantraiaya Raipur C.G. Secretray. Public Work Department D.K.S. Bhawano Mantralaya Raipur Chhattisgarh. Sup tintendent Engineer. Public work Department. Bilaspur Mandel Bilaspur (C.G.) Col 1 ector Bil aspur District Chhattisgarh. Executive Engineer, Public work Department .Bilaspur, Division Number-2, Bilaspur (C.G.) Union of India Through Its Secretrary of Ministry of Labour Dictorate. General of employment and Training .New Delhi. :‘ ' contd....2... ”‘~\\ WRIT PETITION UNDER AREICLES 226WAND 2é7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS‘ANDZOR; CERIIONARIZAND (0R PROHIBITION AND z OR OI‘HER APPROPRIATE 0RDE§¢0RDERS. x XI-HC~22 h 1 -7-2003 5hri Suresh Pandey, counsi Shri Ranbir Singh, 60w. respcnden'rs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Shri V.V.S. Mur‘fhy, Add behalf of fhe responden‘l‘ No.6 / t Heard 5hri Suresh Pandey The pemioner- by fhis peti Consfifufion of India has soug ' mandamus be issued To fhe respo ems and in favour of fhe pefifioner‘ for regularizing fhe pefifioneran fhe 051‘ of Draff man Civil in fhe Pubiic Works l Departmenf of Bilaspur by relaxi’ fhe nafure of mandamus be issue( pefi'fioner' Thaf all The benefifs of pos‘r of Draff man Civil w.e.f. 2 pefi'iioner. :l for The pefi‘rioner. AdvocaTe Takes noTice on behalf of The Tional STanding Counsel Takes noTice on lnion of India. on fhe quesfion of admission. Tion filed under ArTicles 226 / 227 of The T relief ThaT a wriT in The naTure of V ‘ I have heard The learned cc The learned counsel for The peiifioner submiffed That vide Annexure— P/2 The pefii‘ioner- was appoinfed iunsel for The pari‘ies. g maximum age limiT and furTher a wriT in l To The respondenTs and in favour of The GovernmenT servanT as prescribed for The i 4-1996 be direcTed To be paid To The as an apprenTice drafT man‘in The Public XI-HC-22 Works Departmenf OT Bilaspur as a trainee for a period of 3 year's under The Trainee Acf§1996Jand as per The cer‘fificafe Anneuxre—PM given by fhe Sub Divisional Officer, Biinspur, ihe services of fhe peti‘riener were found To be good and fhe same were appreciated by fhe said lef‘rer and now vide Annexure-P/5 The Superin‘rendenf the pe‘ri‘rianer which is illegal, since The pe‘iiiioner was appoini'ed vide Annexure—P/Z, an 29-3-1996, Therefore, his services musf be regularized by fhe If we look inio The order Annexure-P/Z, a perusal of which reveals iha‘i‘i'he pefii'ioner was appointed Engineer, Bilaspur Maidal, Bilaspur, has refused 1-0 give fhe appointment f0 respondents. as a frainee appreni'ice draff man civil from fhe date he takes over the wlork for a period of one year and he was sti en/das per the order of the Central entitled for Rs. 610/- per month as Labour Ministry dated 26m June 1 / 9 On a perusal of Annexure—P/B it appears that the petitioner had op reached the respondents for giving him regular appointment and on that th respondent / Superintendent Engineer, Bilaspur Mandal, Bilaspur hw infer ed him, as per Annexure-P/5, that the petitioner was appointed for a perio of one year for training as a draft man civil apprentice and since a ban h been imposed vide wen dated 30*” August 1994 by the Finance Depor ent of the State of% and moreover there is ho vacancy in the Departm nt only 3 Assistants Draft Man's posts are lying vacant which are exclusive reserved for the S.T. candidates; , L1I§W /\ i— \ XLHC-22 mg