^ P. R. MO..f*»<I«"«*>"'*«yy%"*B»*«"*"<"MMa3 ^^^^^ dated. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH Mli^KJ %-y L] LJ '^' fi^i W. P.(Sl. N0. /2006 PETITIONER RESPONDENT h^\^° ^ ^ ^ y^ ^v^y.^ ^ ^ ^^' Raja Ram Sahu S/o Shri Seva Ram Sahu Age about 45 years, Village- Dubha, Post-DharampuraTehsil - Kawardha Distt. - Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Educational Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Drictt.-Raipur(C.G.) 2. District Education Officer Kawardha, District-Kabirdham (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Kawardha Block Office - Kawardha Disstt.-Kabirdham (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA B—---- XI-HC-78 3n^T^irR-ii+ (TOT 3D^T sPTW *TiNcn affli^i 3ST' •^l^lcl-M, ^i{l<H'l<o, faldiyy.i .:_. ./A..T...^.Q.f. 7n^\ WI 200-^ 3:n^?T'ra^7 (ll?^G"s'iT) ?R(TW Bfersii^r 30.8.2006 couralel tHat Mr. Somkant Verma, Mr. Sotish Supta, Deputy advancecopy. Heard. The case of the petition^r and as per the Instruction datep Assistcnt Teachers who hwe their own expenses crfter- 22-10^ The petitioner possed ths B.Ed. and copy of the mwk sheet to has not been given the benefit, granted two advance increment^ Court. Having heard learned andcircumstances pf the case, the case, the petitioner is allowe^i a copy of this petition and its No.2 within a period of 15 dfliys| directed to examine the case ofl made by the petltioner in this respondent No.2 reoches to the been granted benefit of Iwo also covered fop grant of tiwo for the petitioner. povt. Advocate for the State/respondents, on p^esed °hl<<?CI<l1-f IIIHClT tf fetfl' <Rl<^K ^isff^iTsn^T \r 'is that he is working as Assistont Teocher 24-12-98 issued by the Stort-e of M.P., the 8.T.1., B.Ed. and M.Ed. examinotion on \&A <n*e entitled for- two advance increments. ^xamination on his own cost in the year 1994 effect is Annexure P-4, but the petitioner ifihereos, similarly situated persons have been under the orders of the Tribunol and this cour^sel for the porties, havin9 regard to the facts N)ithout expressing any opinion on the merit of to make a detailed representation along with raising all his grievonces to respondent from todcy and in tum, respondent No.2 is the petitioner in the light of the averments wi^it petition and in the t-epresentation also. If 4onclusion that simitarly situated persons hcwe ad^ance incpements ond the petitioner's case is ad<temce increments on the basis of 6overnment's P.T.O. annlexures wtit ^^•:E3TO^^^'M^%^ Xl-HC-78 HI*IWI a»*rra» TS^'^IPTRPT, ^i'dly'iio, R)di'My< ..^^^^oy^ 200^ &^5 3TT^?T4acb (yI^qST) w^rwf^iN; cRT ai1^T SiITO 1» Soma Brarw HficT wter 2-. order, then respondent No.2 4' petitioner within a period of accordance with law. With the directions aforlssaid Porties a'e entitled for 4 »hi<ifyi41-i•<i4fi)'ir'tecA<Ri'Ki< ^;3lf^IT3n^T halt poss order on the representation of the 3 months from the date of its receipt, in ssaid, the petition stands disposed of. ertified copy of this wdier. y^ P.T.O. r