IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23306 of 2010 SANJAY KUMAR SAH @ SANJAY SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 387 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that some unknown persons demanded ransom from the shop of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that his name sprang up on confession of co-accused. It is further submitted that from perusal of the F.I.R. itself, it appears that only demand was made, hence no case under Section 387 of the Indian Penal Code is made out and at best on the basis of allegation a case under Section 385 is made out. Considering the aforesaid submission, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, regular bail of the petitioner may be considered by the Court below considering the fact that only allegation of demand of ransom has been levelled in the F.I.R. 2 Let the order be transmitted through FAX to the Court of Miss. Akansha Kashap, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Bhagalpur in connection with Bhagalpur Kotwali P.S. Case No. 176 of 2008, at the cost of the petitioner. Anand Kr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)