IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1505 of 2009 SHAMBHU PRASAD,son of Shri Gaya Lal,village- Laund,P.S.-Sirdala,Dist.-Nawada,Co-ordinator of Bhrashtachar Mukti Morcha,Sirdala,Dist.- Nawada. Versus 1. THE STATE BIHAR 2. Director General of Police,Bihar,Patna 3. Inspector General of Police(Police Mukhalaya)Bihar,Patna. 4. Deputy Inspector General of Police,Magadh Range,Gaya 5. Superintendent of Police, Nawada 6. Deputy Superintendent of Police,Rajauli 7. Officer-in-charge, Sirdala 8. Officer-in-charge, Rajauli 9. A.S.I., Rajauli 10. Mamta Devi @ Meena Devi,wife of late Baliram Paswan,village-Kamrua,Halmokam- Rajauli,P.S.-Rajauli,Dist.-Nawada. 11. Sujju Singh,s/o Ram Awtar Singh,village- Banan Toli,P.S.-Rajauli,Dist.-Nawada. ----------- 02/ 14-09-2009 Earlier also Criminal Revision No.230 of 2009 was filed against order dated 20.12.2008, by which cognizance of offence has been taken under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes(Prevention of Atrocities)Act. Submission was made that the case was filed by a fake lady described herself as Mamta Devi wife of late Baliram Paswan,Village-Rajauli, P.S.-Rajauli, District-Nawada. Final report was suggested to be perused in corroboration of the submission. In the final report Mamta Devi was described as Mamta Devi @ Meena Devi. Notice was issued. Mamta Devi appeared also. A submission was made on her behalf that no case was filed by her in the name of Mamta Devi. So, it was found by the Bench hearing revision No.230 of 2009 that a 2 further investigation was needed and for that specific order was made that police should make further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Criminal Procedure and submit a report within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before the learned court below and with such observation revision petition stood disposed of. Now the prayer is made as to second revision is tenable if in first one no order was passed on merit but that is not applicable to this case as final order was passed and some direction had been given, which was needed at the moment. If police has not submitted its report, it is the matter of contempt but not for second revision. Accordingly, this revision application is dismissed as not maintainable. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )