EN TE§E~§E€§E§ QQURT OF CHHATTE$§§ARE§ AT BELASPUR mm? wwrmm' is» 1m olafx a? wm %s§m§% {13mm ?E’FE"EE€ Vii; “<‘i Udho Prasad Sharma, S/o Late Shri Samaran Prasad Sharma, aged about 57 years, Manager (under suspension), Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation, District Office Raipur‘ R/o Quarter No.645, Deen Daya] Upadhayay Nagar, Raipur (CG). Versus RESPt‘QNBEN’E‘§ : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection, D.K.S, Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, (CG). 2. Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation, through its Managing Director, Raipur (CG). 3. Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation, Raipur (CG). . . E’E‘ETEQN UNDER ARTECLE 22§ CE” mg§£L CDNSTETDTIDw @Ea" EEJ$EA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARE AT BILASPUR WRH‘ PETITION {S} No. 2U91 Qf‘zCIli) PETETIONER : Uciim Prasad Shanna. \I’ERS US RE$FONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT i>ETITION UNDER ARTXCLE 226 OF 1H}: CON S'HTUHON GF fNDIA SB: Han’bk Shri Satish K. Agéhatrig J. Preseni: Shri B.D.Guru, Advocate far ths petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhach1ri Fanei La‘vwer for iha: Siam/’rgspondant N0. 1. Sin‘iShashmk Thakur. Advoca‘xe for the respondent N0. 2 and 3. GREEK ('QRAL‘) {Pegged on 03"3 day 0f May. 2010) Leamsd counsel appearing for the pemioner. on instmction whmits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage. However, the petitiomr may be peimitted to make a i'epresentation'to the respondent authorities which may be decided in aceoréance with law as early as possible. 2. $h1‘i Thakui', learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 and 3 submits tnat if a representation is made, the same shalt be considered and decided in‘accordance with law on its own merits and perspective, as exneditiousiv as possible, preferabiy Within a period of four weeks from the date ofreceipt of the representation alongwith a copy ofthis order. 3. In View of the above. according to teamed counsel appearing tor the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit