IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (C-482) No. 851 of 2011 Smt. Sarita Sharma W/o Shri Adesh Sharma R/o Sarandarwala, Ranipokhri District Dehradun ………………..petitioner Versus Sri Vinod Singh Rawat S/o Late Ram Chander Singh Rawat R/o Village Bishangarh, P.S. Ranipokhri, District Dehradun …..............Opposite party Shri Amish Tiwari, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. (2) By means of this petition, moved under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 24.05.2011, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Rishikesh, in Criminal Revision No. 198 of 2010, 2 Smt. Sarita Sharma vs. State of Uttarakhand, whereby said court has affirmed the order dated 16.09.2010, passed by Additional Judicial Magistrate, Rishikesh, in Criminal Complaint Case No. 555 of 2010. (3) Brief facts of the case are that, the petitioner Smt. Sarita Sharma, who is a complainant got lodged First Information Report relating to offences punishable under section 420, 467, 471, 452, 323, 504, 506 and 120B of I.P.C., against respondent Vinod Singh Rawat, and three others, after obtaining orders under section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. After investigation, no offence is said to have been made out against the accused including the respondent, and final report was submitted by the Investigating Officer. A protest petition was filed by the petitioner against the final report which was treated as criminal complaint, and statements of the complainant under section 200 and that of witness under section 202 of Cr.P.C., were recorded. The Magistrate after hearing the petitioner (complainant) 3 dismissed the criminal complaint under section 203 of Cr.P.C. The revisional court before whom the order of the Magistrate was challenged, agreed with the view taken by the trial court, and dismissed the revision. (4) Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, and after going through the impugned orders and others papers on record, this court finds that the dispute between the parties is purely of civil nature which relates to the property. I agree with the learned Magistrate, and the learned revisional court that there is no sufficient evidence to summon the respondent Vinod Singh Rawat, to face the trial in respect of offences punishable under section 420, 467, 471, 504 and 506 of I.P.C. (5) Therefore, the petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C., is dismissed summarily. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt.16.09.2011 N.P 4