IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14875 of 2010 1. RAJA RAM @ RAJA RAM PANDIT 2. Rajoo @ Rajoo Mahto Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 13.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that allegation levelled in the F.I.R. does not constitute any offence under Section 366 of the I.P.C., as it was the relation between the informant’s wife and Santosh and leaving matrimonial house. Petitioners are said associates of Santosh. Statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr. P.C. appears as given in her defence about voluntarily leaving the matrimonial house. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Dalsingsarai P.S. Case No. 149 of 2008, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Samastipur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)