1 wp 9525.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9525 OF 2011 Hanmant Bhuja Sarje .. Petitioner Versus Aminsaheb Dadansaheb Kabade .. Respondent Shri M. L. Dharashive, Advocate for the Petitioner. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 12TH DECEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : . Heard Shri Dharashive, the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel submits that by way of amendment application the plaintiff has deleted 4R land. According to the learned counsel the plaintiff obtained an order of temporary injunction and thereafter has sold the suit property and deleted it. The name of the purchaser is also not been given. The learned counsel further submits that even boundaries are corrected by way of amendment. 2. By deleting 4R land, the plaintiff has abandoned his claim 2 wp 9525.11 in respect of said part of the land. Once the said 4R land is deleted as a suit property, then naturally the order of injunction in respect of said 4R land also not remained in force as it is. The same was pursuant to an order of temporary injunction. No prejudice would be caused to the present petitioner. 3. In the light of above, no case for interference is made out in the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. As such, the writ petition is dismissed, however, with no order as to costs. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Dec. 11