WP(C) 5817/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. K. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. B .K. Sharma, learned SC, SWD. The petitioner has called in question the selection of the respondent No. 5 as A nganwadi Worker in Raha Block L.P. School Anganwadi centre on the ground of she being not a local resident of the said centre. Mr. Sharma, learned SC, SWD has p roduced the field verification report of the District Social Welfare Officer, Na gaon, Assam. As per the said report, the said officer has visited the place and found that both the respondent No. 5 and the petitioner are resident of the area in which the Anganwadi centre is located. On physical verification it was also found that the selection of the respondent No. 5 was made in accordance with the procedure. Above being the position on finding of fact, this court exercising the writ juri sdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot make any further roving enquiry. If the respondent No. 5 is a local resident of the Anganwadi Cen tre and secured better merit position over the petitioner, there is no question of setting aside the order. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed.