{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3034 OF 2009 Kachru Maroti Medhang PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr.U.B.Bondar, Advocate for petitioner Mr.K.B.Chaudhari, Addl.G.P. for respondent State ....... [CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. and A.V.POTDAR, J.] DATE : 14th July 2009 PER COURT: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petition is directed against order of the Scrutiny Committee dated 12.01.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that one document, namely a document produced at Exhibit-B was not considered by the Scrutiny Committee. We were taken through the order of the Scrutiny Committee. On the last but one page of the order, there is reference to this document and this document has been appreciated by the scrutiny committee and the same is rejected on the ground that the document is of recent origin. No fault can be {2} found with the appreciation of evidence done by the Scrutiny Committee. In this view of the matter, no case is made out by the petitioner to interfere with the impugned order. Writ petition is dismissed. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [V.C.DAGA, J.] drp/wp3034-09