IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14992 of 2009 1. BRAHMDEO YADAV 2. Mukesh Yadav 3. Anil Yadav 4. Tuntun Yadav Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 01.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is a land dispute in between the parties as purchaser from different sharers and for that only making super added allegation of theft, petitioners have been made accused, even then they are apprehending their arrest. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 149 of 2008, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jamui subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)