IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.66 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.845 OF 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.A.V.Chatuphale for the applicant. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, A.P.P for the State. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. : A.S.OKA, J. : A.S.OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 13th March 2009. : 13th March 2009. : 13th March 2009. P.C.: . The first application made by the applicant was not pressed. In the order passed on the said application, the statement of the advocate for the applicant was recorded that if hearing of the appeal is expedited and applicant is permitted to file private paperbook, he would not press the prayer for bail at that stage. Hearing of the appeal was expedited with liberty to the applicant to file a private paperbook. The office remark shows that till today private paperbook is not filed. The applicant can always file a private paperbook so that the appeal can be placed for hearing. 2. Hence, the prayer for bail is not (2) considered at this stage. Application is rejected. If the appeal is not heard within a reasonable time, it will be open for the applicant to apply for bail which will be considered on its merits. (A.S.Oka, J)