[IGH COIJRT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILAJSPUR WWT PETITION (S) No. 3304 ot'2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Age about 40 Sliri Slu'iraiii School Hasda-2 1. Mukesh Kumar Baiuode year, U.D. Teacher S/o Bansode Govt. Hr. Sec. Distt.-Raipur("C.G.) 2. Smt. Geeta Laliare Age about 40 yeai', U.D. Teacher H/o Shri Iswar Prasad Lahare Govt. Giri's H.S.S. Simga Distt. - Raipur (C.O.) 3. Jaylal Gendare Age about 37 years, U.D. Teacher S/o Shri Sarjoo Gendare Govt. H.S. School Maiidliar Distt. - Raipur 9C.G.) 4. Smt. Sarojani Tigga Aged about 38 year, Head Master Wo Shri Patrick Tigga Govt. Bovs Middle School Mandir Hasoud Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) 5. Smt. Chetna Singh Aged about 38 year, U.D. Teacher H/'o. Sliri A.K.Singh Pmicipal Govt. H.S.School Sankara (Patan) Distt. Durg(C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Tribal Welfare Department & Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) 2. IMstrict Education OflBcer Raipur/Durg (C.G.) 3. Principal Govt. Hr. Sec. School Sankara (Pataii) District - Durg (C.G.) WRTT PETfHON UNDER ARTICLE.226 OF THE CONSTITUT10N OF INDIA Sinele Bench : Hon'ble Justice Shri Satish K. Aenihotri. Present: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate tor the petitionera. Sliri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer fortSie State/respondeiits. ORDER (Passed on 15°'day ofJune,.2007) 1. The auestion of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioners are errtitled to regular pay scate w.e.fthe date ofinitial appointment or from the date ofcompletion ofprobation pei-iod. 2. Leamed counsel appearins for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in fhe present writ petition are the same as to that ofin W.P. No. 1463/2006 (Aeman Jain Vs. The State Goverament ofChhattisgarh & another), which was allowed vide order dated 10.11.2006. 3. In view ofthe above-stated submissions made bv leamed counsel for fhe parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same tenns. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aiait