1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4388 /2010 (Mr.Manohar Shankarrao Nehul vs. Swargiya Manikrao Anwane Shikshan Sanstha and others ) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : D.D.SINHA & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ DATED : 31st March, 2011. Heard Mr. Mardikar, Adv.h/for Mr Rajnish Vyas, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr Pande, Adv.h/for Mr H A Deshpande, for respondents 1 and 2 and Mr Anand Fulzele, learned AGP for respondents 4 and 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner who was working as a Peon in Lokmanya Matimand Niwasi Vidyalaya, was terminated from service in the year 2004. Against the order of termination, an appeal was preferred bearing No.14/2005 before the Divisional Social Welfare Officer. However in view of the policy then existed, the Divisional Social Welfare officer did not entertain the appeal since the petitioner was not an approved employee of the school concerned. Mr Fulzele, learned AGP on instructions, has made a statement that now it is decided by the State that 2 the appeals preferred by all employees-whether approved or not, shall be entertained by the Appellate Authority and, therefore, the appeal of the petitioner will be entertained and appropriate decision according to law will be taken. The learned AGP is permitted to file the communication in this regard, on record. In view of the statement made by learned AGP the cause of action in the present petition comes to an end. Writ Petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE sahare