IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16107 of 2009 ARVIND KUMAR SINGH @ BITU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 7.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the case torture allegedly caused due to non-fulfilment of demand made by in-laws including this petitioner to transfer ancestral property of the complainant’s parents in favour of this petitioner. The demand is denied with assertion that only vague allegation is made about the torture but attempt of this Court as well as of the Sessions Judge could not finalise whatever may be the reason but it is said on behalf of the complainant that the petitioner was not agreeing to keep her with him as he has solemnised another marriage in Noida. Admittedly the wife is living with her parents and petitioner is suspected even for having another wife or his having illicit relation with another girl that is - 2 - a kind of torture in which petitioner’s bail that also anticipatory is not justified. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI