IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16513 of 2008 1.SAROJ SINGH 2.LALITA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 8.7.2008 Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Barun P.S.case No.94 of 2007 registered under Section 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and pray for grant of anticipatory bail. Mr.Dhruv Narain, Senior Advocate, appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that no role at all has been attributed to so far as petitioner no.2 is concerned in causing the death of the deceased. Mr.Choudhary, Additional Public Prosecutor, appears on behalf of the State. According to the prosecution, it is petitioner no.1, who has caused the death of the deceased. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to accede to the prayer of petitioner no.1 Saroj Singh. However, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no.2 Lalita Devi is allowed and I direct that the petitioner No.2, abovenamed, in the event of her arrest/surrender within four weeks be released on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Barun P.S.case No.94 of 2007, 2 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, before releasing petitioner no.2, the learned Magistrate shall ensure that petitioner no.1 has surrendered in the case. (Chandramauli Kr.Prasad,J.) Narendra/