HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR M. P. No. 2960 [1992 PETITIONERS Phal Sabji Aaloo ‘Pyaj Thok Vikreta .Sangh, 23‘ Shastri ‘Bajar, Raipur, through its SecrEtaIy ,Shri Leelaram Dhulga aged about 45 years, son of Teerath Das, R/o Shastri Bajar, Raipur (CG). Vs. REsPONDEN'rs 1. Krishi Upaj Mandi samiti, Raipur, through its Secretary. 2. The State of Madhya Pradesh, through Secretary Agriculture Department Ballab Bhawan, Bhopal. INDIA PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226(227 OE THE CONSTITUTION ' OF Aggearance: None for the petitioner. Mr. Gautam Bhaduri, counsel for respondent no: 1. Mr. Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate, fer respondentno.2. ORAL ORDER m L KUMAR SINHA J This matter was received on transfer from High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur. Earlier, SPCs‘were issued \to the parties. When no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner after issuance of the SPC, this Court directed for issuance of notice to the. petitioner from the Court side for a date to be fixed by the office. In compliance of the earlier order, notice was issued to the petitioner and service SUNI (10.03.2010) v has been effected on it. Even after the service of notice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. When there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even after service of Court notice, this court is left with no other way except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, M.P.No.2960/1992 is dismissed for want of prosecution. ‘nm Sdl- i {Sunil Kumar Sinhaif Judge .j