IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 632 of 2010 Decided on: February 26, 2011. Ved Parkash. ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the petitioner: Mr. H.K. Paul, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. A.G. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayers:- “(i) Respondents may kindly be directed by issuing appropriate writ, order or direction and a writ in the nature of mandamus to grant work charged status to the Petitioner soon after completion of eight years of daily wage service or from any other subsequent date to which the Petitioner may be found to be entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interests of justice; (ii) The Respondents may kindly be directed to grant all consequential benefits and arrears of salary, seniority etc.” 2. The petitioner claims work charge status on completion of eight years of continuous service as daily waged Beldar. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 2735 of 2010, Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and others. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of 2 four months from the date of production of copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment referred to above. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. February 26, 2011. ( Justice V.K. Ahuja ), (karan/vs) Judge.