IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2011 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 495 of 2011(S) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- MANI BALAN, AGED 41, W/O BALAKRISHNAN, KUNNUMPURATHU VEEDU, KUMBAZHA P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA DIST. BY ADV. SRI.V.SETHUNATH. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689 645. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM, PIN-691 001. 4. ANANDU @ APPU, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O SAJI, KALIYILAZHAKATHU VEEDU, ALANCHERY, P.O, ANCHAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT. PIN-691 306. 5. VIPIN, S/O GEORGE, NEAR ANCHAL MISSION HOSPITAL, COLLEGE JUNCTION, ANCHAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT. PIN-691 306. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. RAMPRASAD UNNI, ADV. SRI. SYAM J. SAM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(CRL.).NO.495/2011-S: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT:- EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE F.I.R. & F.I.S. AND COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO. 869/2011 OF PATHANAMTHITTA POLICE STATION. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ----------------------------------- W.P(Crl.).No.495 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,J. 1.The alleged detenue is present. The petitioner is her mother. We interacted with the alleged detenue, the petitioner, the 4th respondent, as also his father. 2.The alleged detenue tells us that she desires to marry the 4th respondent, though he is not now of marriageable age. We record this submission. She also says that she will go with her mother and would aspire to marry the 4th respondent in due course. 3.We find that the alleged detenue is well oriented. She is clear in her views. We record that she is now going with her mother. We leave the parties to take decisions on their own. WPCR.495/11 2 We do so having regard to the fact that the alleged detenue has stated that she desires to marry the 4th respondent in the long run. Obviously, being a person who is a major, she cannot be given in marriage by the parents without her consent. Subject to this, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR, Judge. kkb.2/11.