IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No.13253 of 2009 Date of decision: 27.8.2009 M/s Surinder Chadha. -----Petitioner Vs. Union of India. -----Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. V.D. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. --- ORDER: 1. This petition seeks quashing of Tender Notice dated 4.8.2009, Annexure P-10 termination of work allotted to the petitioner. 2. Case of the petitioner is that cleanliness work at the Railways Station was allotted to the petitioner for one year on 24.3.2009. Respondent made an allegation that the work of the petitioner was not satisfactory and a Show Cause Notice dated 25.5.2009, Annexure P-2, was issued. Thereafter, on 29.7.2009 representative of the petitioner was asked to stop the work, which was followed by Show Cause Notice dated 3.8.2009, Annexure P- 5, followed by Short Term Tender Notice dated 4.8.2009, Annexure P-10. Thereafter, vide notice dated 17.8.2009, Annexure P-7, one week notice was given to the petitioner to CWP No.13253 of 2009 terminate the contract, on failure to make good the progress in work. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the work of the petitioner was satisfactory as it has been submitted in reply, Annexure P-8, dated 18.8.2009, but without considering the stand of the petitioner, the respondent is proceeding to award fresh contract. 4. We are of the view that question whether the work performed by the petitioner was satisfactory or was not in terms of the contract and whether the petitioner or the respondent has committed breach of contract, is a matter which cannot be adjudicated at forum of writ jurisdiction. 5. The petition is dismissed, without prejudice to any other remedy of the petitioner in accordance with law. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE August 27, 2009 ( DAYA CHAUDHARY ) ashwani JUDGE 2