ssp 1 WP(L) 2568 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2568 OF 2011 Ruztomjee’s Ozone CHS Ltd. .....Petitioner versus Brihan Mumbai Mahanagarpalika and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.Ashish Kamath with Ms.Nidhi Singh i/by Indian Law Alliance, for the petitioner. Ms.P.A.Purandare, for the respondent-Corporation. Mr.T.V.Dahibawkar, for respondent No.4. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE: 30 th NOVEMBER, 2011 P.C. 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that since he has already filed an appeal under Section 47 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, he would like to prefer stay application before the appellate authority. In order to enable the petitioner to file stay application, we direct the respondent-Corporation to maintain status quo prevailing as on today for a period of two weeks. It is clarified that we have not expressed any opinion on merits and it is for the appellate authority to consider this aspect in accordance with law. ssp 2 WP(L) 2568 of 2011 2. Subject to what has been stated above, the writ petition is disposed of. ( MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)