HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAIéH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5012 of2008 PETITIONERS : 1. Sukhveer Singh Malhotra, S/o Shri D.S.Malhotra, aged about 39 years, House No. 23/146, Manglam Vihar, Kosabadi, Korba. 2. Tulsiram Mahish, S/o Bhogdev Prasad Mahish, aged — 39 years, P.O. Taprda, Tah. & Distt. Raigarh. 3. Ramkumar Patel S/o Shri Tarachand Panel age 33 yeaxs,P.O. Bhedvan, Tah. Sarangaxh, Distt. Raigarh. ‘ 4. Devkumar Choudhary S/o Shti ‘Chaturbhuj Choudhary, aged 36 years P0. Bammkela, Tah. Sarangarh, Dlstt Ralgarh 5. Durgesh Kumar Bhm S/o Shn N Bhoi aged 39 years Torva Patel Para Bllaspur . Saheb Ram Choudhary S/o Shn Govmd Ram Choudhary, aged 49 years, Kumhari Past Him Tah Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh‘ 7. Sanjay Kumar Pate1 S10 Shni Baburam ?ate1, aged 36 years, Vill. Tayang, Post Jaimura Tah - Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh. 8. Suresh Kama: Xalxo, S/o Shri Junus Xaixe, aged 38 years behind Rambhénta Church, Raigarh 9. Rookchand Ram Bhagat, S/o Shrl Budhram Bhagat, aged 46 years, Vill—Slkana Post Nanalbod, Tah Bageecha Dlstt Jashpumagar 10. Rohit Kumar Patel Slo Shri Vijay Shankar Patel, aged 33 years, Vill. Post —- Gobar Siha, Tah. Smngarh, Distt. Raigarh. 11.Jaimashih Kujur S/o Shri siril Kujur ageé 44 years, Darbari Toli Jashpumagar, Distt. Jashpumag‘ar. 12. Pradeep Kumar Shanna son of Shri Parasram Shanna, aged about 45 years, resident of Near Teiephone Exchange, Beladula Road, Raigarh (CG) 13.Praveen Kumar Shanna Son of Shri Loknath Shanna, aged about 43 years, resident of Village Fest Netnagar, Tehsil & Distn'ct Raigarh (CG) 14.Ramji Lal Patel S/o Shri Jaijairam Patei, aged 30 years, V111 & Post Bar Block Aramkela, Tab Sarangarh Drstt Ralgarh 13 Haseena Begam o/o Shekh Rahman (Meera) aged 42 years,Near Meera Datar Ind1ramgar Raigarh ~ 16 Qmt Girija Shadang', W/o BKPrahraj, aged 48 years, Seth1 Nagar Smdlu Colony Near Pole Factory, Rmgarh 17 Jagdev Fukl S/o Rupsar Tukl aged 45 years, V111 uam Para, Post Ludeg Tah Patthalgaon, Last: Jashyur. 18. S.D.Yadav, s/o Shn’ Vrndavan. Yadav, aged 46 years, Ashirwad Bhavan, Mansarovar Nagar, Chhote Atarguda, Ralgarh 19 Smt Matllda Baarla C/o Shn Bholaram Sao aged 49 years Near smvganga Tallues Kunkun, Tah & Post Kunkurl, Dlstt Jashpurnagar 20.Surendra Kumar Fukl Slo B.R.Tirki, aged 35 years, ‘ P.O. Bageecha, Distt. Jashpumagar.‘ 21.Shivnath Ram Bhagat S/o Shri Pavloos Ram Bhagat: aged 45 years, vill. Sikaria, Post Narial Dand, Dim. Raigarh. 22.Smt. Kalista Kujur W/o Balram Bhagat, aged 43 years Dampara, Patthalgaon, Tah. Patthalgaon, D1stt Jashpur 23 Kanhmya Lal Chandra S/o Jugul Ram Chandra, aged 51 years, Uttarchakradhar Nagar, Near Lokmany Tilak School, Raigarh (C.G.) 24.Niranjan Lal Sidar, S/o Shri Dhobai Lal Sidaly aged 32 years, vill. Kapartunga, Post Ayalipali,Tah. Sarangarh, Dislt. Raigarh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS :1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Cooperative, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2. The Regxstrar Cooperatwe Soc1et1es Chhattisgarh, Ralpur 3. The Conector cum OElcial Liquidator District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, .Raigarh. 7, District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Raigarh. District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Raipur, through its Chief Executive Oliicer Raipur t District Cooperatlve Central Bank Limited, Durg, through Its Chief Executive Oificer Durg District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Bilaspur, through its ChiefExecutive Otticer, Bilaspur, District Cooperative Central Bank Limited. Rajnandgaon, through its Chief Executive Ofiicer, Rajnandgaon. District Cooperative Central Bank Limited, Jagdalpur through its Chief Executive OiTicer Jagdalpur 10. Chhattrsgar Rajva Shahkari Bank Maryadrt (Apex Bank) through its Chief Executive Omcer Indira Gandhi Commercial Complex, Pandri, Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 O i a F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Present: SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondents 1 to 3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 10m day of September, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that despite the order dated 22.02.2007 (Annexure P111) wherein it is clearly directed that the employees who have not completed 50 years of age may be considered for rehabilitation, the subsequent order dated 22.12.2006 (Annexure P/lO) contines to only certain class of employees. The same does not cover all the employees. 0n perusal of the order dated 22.02.2007 (Annexure P/ll), it appears that the intention is‘very clear that all the employees whohave not attained the age of 50 years, deserve consideration for rehabilitation. Ifthere is any ambiguity in the subsequent order, it should be clarified by the Registrar, Co—operative Societies. The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, i.e. the respondent N0. 3 will further ensure that the order dated 22nd February, 2007 is complied with in its letter and spirit within the prescribed period as mentioned in the order itself. In view of the foregoing, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing remains for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Amit Sdl- l .Satish K. Agnihotri Judge