1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10501 OF 2009 M/s. Tulip Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. ... Petitioner Vs. Pune Municipal Corporation & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. A.V.Anturkar with Mr. Sugandh B.Deshmukh,Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr. A.P.Kulkarni, Advocate, for respnodent Nos. 1 & 2. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 15th December, 2009. P.C. 1. It is not necessary to set out facts in detail. On behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2, the learned Counsel makes a statement that they will send a reminder to respondent No.3 in respect of whom the petitioner has made allegations of illegal construction and thereafter within three weeks they will take a decision after hearing the respondent No.3 and the petitioner, if required. The statement made on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 is accepted. The respondent Nos. 1 and 2, after considering the controversy, to decide and take action according to law and not later than four weeks from today. 2 With the above observations, the petition is disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)