IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.779 of 2010 SANJAY KUMAR YADAV @ LADDU YADAV SON OF MISHRI YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 11.5.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 364A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the first information report and later on a speculation was raised against the petitioner that he could be involved. When co-accused Shivendu Yadav was arrested, on whose statement the victim was recovered from his father-in-law, he stated that the petitioner was also involved in the occurrence. When phone calls were traced, it was found that the petitioner was in communication with the other co-accused persons involved in the present occurrence. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious nature of the offence. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )