IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.748 OF 2006 Mohamed Noman Suleman...Petitioner Vs. The Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Ors.........Respondents Mr. Shashi K. Pandey for the Petitioner Mr. K. Thakkar i/b. Utangale & Co., for Respondent No.1. Mr. Pradeep Jadhav, AGP for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4. Mr. H.S. Anand, for Respondent Nos. 6 and 7. Mrs. S. Ajit Kumar for Respondent No.5. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA JJ V. MOHTA JJ V. MOHTA JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 17th April,2006 : 17th April,2006 : 17th April,2006 P.C.: . The grievance of the petitioner is that though his name was included in the Annexure 2 he has neither been given transit accommodation nor permanent accommodation. On behalf of Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 their learned Counsel points out that vide order dated 27th July, 2004 and 31st March, 2004 the inclusion of the petitioner’s name at Annexure 2 was cancelled. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has not been heard. Whatever be the position, it will be open to the petitioner to prefer an Appeal before the Competent Forum. With the above observation petition is disposed of. (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)