IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.34473-M of 2009 Date of Decision:25.2.2010 Krishan Kumar .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Sunil Toni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of direction to respondent No.1 to arrest respondents No.2 and 3 in case FIR No.171 dated 6.9.2009 under Sections 307/452/34 IPC, 25/27/54/59 of Arms Act. Reply has been filed by way of affidavit of Amarjeet Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Mansa on behalf of respondent No.1 stating therein that after thorough inquiry, it was found that the case is false and in this regard a case diary No.09 dated 28.10.2009 was recorded and it was also found by SHO City Mansa vide case diary dated 4.1.2010 that a false case was registered by the petitioner and no offence is made out under Section 307/452/34 IPC. Gurpiyar Singh and Makhan Singh were also found innocent. Rather, during investigation, offence under Section 336 IPC and 25-27 of Arms Act was made out against the complainant Krishan Kumar son of BudhRam resident of Mansa. In this regard a DDR No.19 dated 5.1.2010 was lodged at Police Station City Crl. M. No.34473-M of 2009 -2- Mansa. DSP Sh. Amarjit Singh Sub Division, Mansa also verified the case and found that the case has been falsely registered by the complainant vide case diary No.17 dated 7.1.2010. It is further stated that two applications dated 6.10.2009 and 10.9.2009 were moved by Krishan Kumar-petitioner before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Mansa. For the enquiry of these applications, notice under Section 160 of Cr.P.C was issued to the petitioner to join the enquiries but he has not come forwarded for the same. In view of the written statement filed by the State, no further action is required and the present petition is accordingly dismissed. 25.2.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE