IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 15TH MAGHA 1932 RCRev..No. 252 of 2008() ------------------------ RCA.1/2007 O F RENT CONTROL APPELLATE authority , PARAVUR RCP.7/1997 of MUNSIFF COURT, PARAVUR (EA.40/2005,EP.3/1999) .................... REVISION PETITIONER (APPELLANT/PETITIONER) -------------------------------------------------------------- RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O.KRISHNAN, CHERUPARAMBIL HOUSE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, MARADU VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT PARAVUR VILLAGE, PERUVARAM KARA. BY ADV. SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY SRI.V.V.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.A.JOSEPH GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT ------------------------------------- SUKUMARAN, S/O.MADHAVAN, VALIAPARAMBIL, MANAKKODAM MURI, CHENDAMANGALAM VILLAGE. ADV. SRI.LIJU.V.STEPHEN FOR R1 THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------ R.C.R.No. 252 OF 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of February, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner seeks time for getting instruction from the party. We are not inclined to grant time. The revision petition will stand dismissed as abated as against the legal representatives of sole respondent. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE dpk