IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.206 of 2008 Alok Kumar, son of Bhagya Narayan Prasad, resident of village, P.O. and P.S.- Motipur, district- Muzaffarpur. ..... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, West, Muzaffarpur. 3. Sri Lal Babu Singh, Circle Officer, Motipur, district- Muzaffarpur. 4. Sri Sita Ram Roy, Son of Sukha Roy, resident of village- Sudha Damber, Motipur, Block, Motipur, district- Muzaffarpur. ..... Respondents. ----- 02- 18.3.2009 Heard Mr. Ramadhar Singh for the petitioner, and learned assistant counsel to Mr. Satyadeo Kumar, learned Standing Counsel No.12. By order dated 12.12.2006 (Annexure-1), passed by respondent no.2, he remitted the matter back to the concerned Anchal Adhikari for local inspection and for orders in accordance with law. The operative portion of the order is reproduced hereinbelow: “fuEu U;k;ky; n~okjk vfHkys[k [kksydj vke lwpuk fuxZr fd;k x;k gS rFkk gYdk deZpkjh ,oa vapy fujh{kd ds izfrosnu ij ukekUrj.k fd;k x;k gS fdUrq LFky fujh{k.k ugha fd;k x;k gS@ vr% vapy vf/kdkjh dks funsZ’k fn;k tkrk gS fd Lo;a nksuks i{kksa dks lwfpr dj LFky fujh{k.k dj fof/k lEer dkjZokbZ djsa@” The petitioner raises a grievance before this Court that the Anchal Adhikari is not acting in the matter, is not conducting 2 the local inspection, let alone the question of passing the final order. 2. The materials on record do not indicate that the petitioner made any attempt to move the learned Anchal Adhikari to dispose of the matter as per the order of respondent no.2 expeditiously. The petitioner has instead rushed to this Court without any justification. It is a frivolous writ petition and is accordingly dismissed. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/