1 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1029 OF 2011 Dattu Khandu Shinde .Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.A.P.Mundargi, Sr.Counsel with Mr.Abhishek Yende, for the Applicant Smt.S.V.Sonawane, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 19TH DECEMBER, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. This is an application for anticipatory bail by a person, who apprehends arrest in connection with C.R.No.361 of 2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Karmala Police Station, District Solapur and who is alleged to have raped 22 years married woman, who had been deserted by her husband, on 4th January, 2011 promising her that he would look after her for the whole life. Thereafter, from 9th January, 2 2011 to 30th April, 2011 her cousin is supposed to have raped her leading to pregnancy. A complaint that the victim was missing given on 3rd January, 2011 which was closed after recording statements of witnesses on 25th January, 2011. The statement of victim recorded on 8th January, 2011 shows that because she had some minor quarrel with her parents she had left her house for house of aunt Hirabai Londhe at Pune. It is not clear as to how if she had left for Pune on 3rd January, 2011, the applicant could visit her parents' house on 4th January, 2011 and commit rape upon her. In view of this, application is allowed. In the event of arrest, applicant be released on bail on his furnishing P.R.Bond of ` 25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of ` 25,000/- on the following conditions. (i) The applicant shall report at the Karmala Police Station, District Solapur on 23rd December, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. and thereafter, as and when required by the investigating officer. 3 (ii) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. (iii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iv) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in AIR 2011 (SC) 312(Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State of Maharashtra And Ors.). 2. Criminal Application is disposed of. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)