IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.582 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:27.01.2011. Yash Pal Suri ...Petitioner Versus Sh. Ashwani Kumar and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Paramjit Singh Jammu, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 06.01.2011 whereby an application filed by the respondent for fixing the mense profit during the pendency of the stay granted by the Appellate Authority, has been allowed. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the learned Rent Controller has erred in assessing the mense profit @ `6,000/- per month, although the demised premises is let out @ `150/- per month. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record with his assistance. The mense profit claimed by the respondent was to the tune of `15,000/- per month of the demised premises which is a house consisting of two rooms, kitchen, bathroom and latrine, situated in Sector 15-A, Chandigarh, but the learned Rent Controller has fixed the market rent with respect of the demised premises only to the tune of `6,000/- per month which, to my mind, is not excessive keeping in view the rate of rent prevailing of the demised premises in Sector 15-A, Chandigarh. Hence, the present revision petition is hereby dismissed in limine, however, without any order as to costs. January 27, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE