IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M. No. 6162-CII of 2009 and C.M. No. 15818-CII of 2009 and FAO No. 1266 of 2009 Date of decision:- 20.11.2009. Jugraj Singh ...Petitioner Versus Harbans Singh @ Kaka and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present:- Mr. Arun Luthra, Advocate for Ms. Amandeep Sibia, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner. Mr. Pardeep Goel, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance Company. RAKESH KUMAR GARG J. C.M. No.25818-CII of 2009 Reply filed to the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act on behalf of respondent No.3-United India Insurance Company Ltd. has taken on record. Civil Miscellaneous application is disposed of. C.M. No.6162-CII of 2009 This is claimant's appeal seeking enhancement of compensation. Alongwith this appeal an application has been filed for condonation of delay for 824 days. The only explanation submitted for condoning the delay is that the appellant was ill advised by his counsel. However, learned counsel was unable to cite any law in support of his argument. In view of the aforesaid I do not find any sufficient reason to condone the delay. Hence, the application for condoning the delay is rejected. FAO NO.1266 of 2009 Since the application for condonation of delay has been rejected, this appeal is dismissed being time barred. November 20, 2009 ( Rakesh Kumar Garg ) vj Judge