® APPLICANT: NON-APPLICANT; HI6H COURT OF CHHATTESeARH, BZLASPUR Crimlnal Mlsc. Petltion No.92 of 2009 - U^ha Bai, W/o Shri ©oreial Satnami, aged about 30 year^, R/o Viiiage Daukapa, P.S Jarhagaon/ Tahsil Mungeli, Distt. Bilaspur (C.&.) Versus State of Chhatt'isgarh; Through Poiice Station Lalpur, Tahsi! AAurige!'!, Distt, Biiaspur(C.&.) (AppiicaTion under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for modification of the order dated 9-2-2009} Present: Mr. AA.K- Sinha, counsel for the appiicant. Mr. P*R. Patankar, Pane! Lawyer for the State. SinQle Bench: Hon'bk Mr. T,P. Sharma. J ORAL ORDER (24-2-2009) 1. This petition is for modification of the order dated 9-2-2009 passed by this Court in Misc. Criminai Case (A) No.765/2008. 2. I have heard iearned counse! for the parties and perused the petition. 3. Learned counsel for the appiicant submits that the present applicant is iiable for offence punishGble under Sections 323 & 342 of the I.P.C., but due to typographicai & clerical mistake, instead of Section 342 of the I.P,C, Section 232 of the IP.C. has been recorded in para 3 of the order dated 9-2-2009 passed by this Court in Misc. Criminal Case (A) NoJ65/2008, Learned counsei further s'ubmits that it requires modification* 4. On the other hand, ieamed counsei appearing on behalf of the State submits that he has no objection. 5. The petition is allowed, Section 232 of the LP,C, mentioned in para 3 of the order dated 9-2-2009 passed by this Court 'm AAisc. Criminai Case (A) No.765/2008 be read QS Section 342 of the I.P.C. 6. Copy of this order be sent to the Court' beiow. 7. Certified copytoday. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge