^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR WRIT PETITION N0.c;)^^ \1998 UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Ashok Kumar Dewangan, S/o Shri Hagaru Das Dewangan, Aged about 37 years/ R/o Village Belargaon/ Tahsil - NAGARI District :DHAMTARI (MP) Contractor/Agent M/s. Anand Traders, Charama, Manufacturer of 51 No. Bidis -VERSUS- ' State of Madhya Pradesh, Department of Labour/ Through it's Secretary, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan/ BHOPAL (MP) <^ 2. The Assistant Labour Commissioner < and Competent Authority under the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, Raipur Division, RAIPUR (MP) 3. The District Magistrate & Collec-cor, RAIPUR (MP) ...PETITIONER 'r ^- The Naib Tahsildar, Tahsil - NAGARI District : miAMTARI ...RESPONDENTS -/ <f PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION ETC. AND FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER/DIRECTION XI-HC-78 *iiHrtia»1Tr^ \jwit^1qiC)^tPTi1'<1<l<o, l^rtl'd1^ .^.f..S?.?/hi..c%.... 3TT^$T<l5TR<licp ^TTOT^^Tw+licp 3fl^$t q^cp (X3^t3^) W1200 ST^TTW^^ 3TT^$T couh^el fhr agcyn s.y.^uus? Shri A<S* Seharwar; Shri Sunii Otwani, P.L. The main grievctnce rai| that the a show cause/demd Labour (Prohibition & Regu| 15.5.1997 askinq the petition®) compensation for empioyin^ Kamleshwari. Thereafter, the; pfititioner firm/ wherea^ pstitioner in the esTablishmert h@orin9 th©petitioner. In th<^ the Court of ieamed Chief fiied repiy to the showcau^; caus^ notic^s have been issul personai hearing to the eff{ notice^ are iiable to be qua^het In similar matters i,e.| between Amolchand Jain Vs. Jabalpur held that ^demand^ heanng to the person affect^d ordc^ <pi<<Io<ni ^ii+icoT^S f^L<£l^RI^-CK ^3Tf^T3TT^$T for the petitioner, the State. ^ed by the petitioner ih thb petition b (id notjce under Section 17 of the Child |ation) Act, 1986 has been issued on .^-firm to deposit a sum of Rs,20,OOOA as one child labour namely Kumarj ^imilar notice was sent on 27*5*1997 to / no child labour was engag&d by the tt and the same has been issued without meantime, a challan has abo been filed in Jludicial Magistrate, Raipur. The petitioner notices and stated that impugned show i^d without affording any opportunity of ^cted person and on this ground aione ;H. WP. No.4809/97 ond W.P. No.927/97 ^tate 1+ie High Court of Madhya Pradesh, rassed withouf affordfng opportunffy of is unsustamabfe /n law and quashsd the XI-HC-78 \jw|<-qi<L||rtq,tPTl1<<-l<l<?, Roi^iy »IPfC?T9»m^ CT^^TcCTR^lich wn^^Tawra? ^)-)kc^J ,-. .^.^ ^ 3TT^?T^Sf) (ijc|Ij6|<^) WL200 ?^TTW ^Tfi?T W^$T -2 nnexMro It te adrnitted position rai^ed without affordlng op{: therefore, same is liabie To show cause notice^ (Ar Howeve-r, it wouid be open petitioner afresh, considei| thereGfte-r, pass the order in appear before the competenl thereafter the competent hearing the petitiQnfir1 pas5 1+i< With the dir^ction stands di^posed of, Certifted copy as per cpi«Io41<i^i+ioT^'fe^ ^RI^-CIK ^3lf^T3n$^T ^hat in the pre^^nt case demand has been >p{?ortunity of hearing to 1+s@ petitioner/ |3e set aside. Accordingiy, the impugned A-l & A-2) are hereby qua^hed. l-o -rtie competent authority to hear the The contention of petitioner ond ^ccordance with bw. The petitioner shai} authorit/ on 14 November, 2005 and <|iuthority shail fix the date and after ord&r in accordcmce with iaw. <^nd observation aforesajd, the petition rulles. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge