1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 397 OF 2008 (Surendra s/o Shalikram Ardak vs. Zilla Parishad, Amravati and others) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : APRIL 21, 2008 Heard Shri Deshpande, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Kale, learned Counsel for the respondents. The petition is directed against the order of transfer dated 31.5.2007 whereby petitioner, who was working as Assistant Teacher in the School run by Panchayat Samiti, Achalpur came to be transferred to one of the Schools run by Panchayat Samiti, Chikhaldara at village Chakdari. Shri Deshpande, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that name of the village where petitioner is transferred, has not been correctly reflected in the impugned order of transfer. 2 The learned Counsel for the respondents does not dispute this aspect and states that petitioner was transferred by the impugned order of transfer to the School located at village Bagdari, which comes under Panchayat Samiti, Chikhaldara. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, it is evident that respondents did not mention correct name of village where petitioner was transferred and for the first time, correction in this regard is effected now and, therefore, in the interest of justice, we direct the respondents to give effect to the impugned order of transfer dated 31.5.2007 only after present academic session is over, if they so desire. Needless to mention that petitioner is entitled to get salary for the work factually discharged by him as an Assistant Teacher. With these directions and observations, the petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE khj