HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WritPetitionCONo. 6877 of2007 PETITIONER : Abdul Gaiii Memon S/o Adam Bhai, aged about 33 years R/o Nunera (Pali), District Korba (CO). VERSUS IRESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Dqiartment of Transport, Mantralaya, DK8 Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Regional Transport Authority, Raipur, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya Raipur (CG). 3. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, BUaspur(CG). 4. Laldivindrer Pal Singh S/o Late S. Sugeet Singh aged about 40 years, R/o Kusmunda District Korba(CG). (WMT PETTHON UNDER ARTfCLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDU) (SB: Hon'Ue Mr. Satish K. Agniho<ri, J.) Present : ShriS.K. Bajpai, Advocate for tfae petitiouer. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt Advocate for the State. ORALORDER (1) (2) (3) (4) >Bi (Passed on thls 19'" ofNovember, 2007) By tfais petition, the petitioner seefcs to challenge the order dated 01.10.2007 (Anuexure P/l), passed by the Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur, whereby, tfae regular bus pemiit granted in favour of the petitioner irom PaU to Korba and vice-versa, vide memo No. 3025/B/07, was cancelled. There is a statutory appeal provided under the provisions of The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to apin-oach the State Transport Appellate Tribunal against flie order passed by the Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur. The petitioner has bye-passed the statutory appeal provided under provisions oflaw and direcUy approached this court by way ofthis writ petition, seeking quashing ofthe order passed by the Regional Transport Autfaority, Bilaspur. There is no extra-ordinary circumstanees which necessitates interference by this Court direetly under Article 226 ofthe Constitiitionoflndia. The petitioner has failedto take recourse to statatory appeal provided under provisions ofThe Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. ^i (6) Saiin Thus, this petition is not mamtainable and is accordingly dismissed on the ground of availability of altemative statirtory remedy under the provisions oflaw. No order asto costs. However, tfie petitioner is at liberty to take recourse to altemative statutory remedy that may be available to him under the provisions of law. ~~ ~ Sd/- Saash K.Agnihotri ^. /