THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO :22505 of 2009 DATED: 21-10-2009 Between: ATA-UR-RAHMAN. ..... PETITIONER And The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad & 4 others. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: Complaining that the police are interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and one Kum.Radhika Kuashal and directing the petitioner to appear before the police station every day and also issuing notice on 13-10-2009 for production of the original documents and the vendors etc., petitioner approached this Court and filed the present Writ Petition. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents. 3. On instructions, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the said Radhika filed a complaint on 12-10-2009 and on the basis of the same, a case in Cr.No.601 of 2009 was registered against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 447 and 427 IPC. During the course of investigation, as it was required, the official respondents issued a notice directing the petitioner to produce the original sale deeds along with the link documents and also to produce the vendors within a period of seven days. Definitely, the said action can be said to be exceeding the jurisdiction. From the above facts, it is apparent that there is a civil dispute between the petitioner and the said Radhika. If she has given a private complaint, the police are justified in registering the same as a case in Cr.No.601 of 2009 for the offences punishable under Sections 447 and 427 IPC, but under the guise of the registration of the crime and investigation they cannot cross their limits and direct the petitioner to produce the sale deeds etc., The only scope is as to whether the petitioner has trespassed into the lands belonging to the said complainant or not. For that purpose, they cannot direct the petitioner to produce the original sale deeds and the original vendors etc., Hence, this Court has no hesitation to come to the conclusion that the said action is unexpected. Accordingly, respondents are directed to confine themselves to the investigation of Cr.No.601 of 2009 with regard to the offences for which the said crime has been registered. 4. Accordingly, Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ T.GOPALAKRISHNA,J 21st October, 2009. Note: Issue operative portion of the order by wire at party’s costs. B/o Tsy