IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.3015 of 2009 Date of Decision:- 31.03.2010 Bikkar Singh ....Petitioner(s) vs. Union of India and others ....Respondent(s) *** CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH *** Present:- Mr.Arvind Mittal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Anjali Kukar, Advocate, for the respondents. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedy of preferring a revision as provided under Rule 29 of the Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955. He further states that the period spent while pursuing the remedy of writ petition, may not be taken into consideration by the Court while deciding the application for condonation of delay in filing the revision. The present writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to avail the remedy of revision under Rule 29 of the Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955. The period spent while pursuing the remedy of writ petition, shall not be taken into consideration while deciding the application for condonation of delay in filing the revision. It is clarified that no opinion on the question of delay has been C.W.P.No.3015 of 2009 -2- expressed by this Court and it would be open to the petitioner to file an appropriate application for condonation of delay by putting-forth the reasons whichever is available to him in the said application. March 31, 2010 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) poonam JUDGE