BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Second day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9133 of 2011 S.KARTHIKEYAN ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.8 Vs THE STATE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CITY CRIME BRANCH, THENI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.30 OF 2011) ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.A.OMPRAKASH Advocate For Respondent :Mr.A.RAMAR,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner filed this petition seeking for anticipatory bail for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 465, 468, 471, 419 and 420 IPC, in Crime No.30 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner apprehends arrest in Crime No.30 of 2011 registered under Sections 465, 468, 471, 419 and 420 IPC, and stating that on 02.05.2011, totally there are eight accused, produced the bogus sureties to the Court for releasing the accused persons from jail. Only on the basis of confession given by A7, the petitioner is arrayed as A8. Hence, the petitioner apprehends arrest and seeks for anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.SIde) would submit that the case has been registered on 02.05.2011 against seven persons and on the basis of confession statement given by A7, the petitioner was implicated and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4.Considering the rival submissions made by either side and also perused on records, it is clear that the complaint has been given on 02.05.2011, against the seven persons that they are arranging bogus sureties for releasing accused person from jail. After receipt of confession statement given by A7, the petitioner is arrayed as A8 and hence I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, I direct the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner to surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate -cum- District Munsif at Andipatti and file a petition for bail and in the event of filing such an application, the learned Judicial Magistrate -cum- District Munsif, Andipatti is directed to dispose of the petition for bail as expeditiously as possible. With the above direction, this petition is disposed. of. sd/- 02/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CUM DISTRICT MUNSIF AT ANDIPATTI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THENI DSITRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CITY CRIME BRANCH, THENI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. T.A.OMPRAKASH Advocate SR.No.25707 rl/6c – 4.8.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9133 of 2011 Date :02/08/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/