IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29544 of 2010 JAI RAM RAI, S/o. late Ram Bhajan Rai, Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 11.10.2010 The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Ujiarpur P.S.Case No. 106 of 2009 under Section 379/34 Heard. The deceased was registered against three unknown criminals with the allegation that while the informant had parked his motorcycle and gone away for urinating, three unknown criminals sat on the motorcycle, started it, and escaped with the motorcycle with a bag containing mobile phone. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. is against the unknown. Further submission is that the petitioner’s complicity is alleged on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused Chintu Kumar who named the petitioner as one of the associates. It is submitted that Chintu Kumar was put on T.I.P. but he was not identified by the informant. Learned counsel emphasized that 2 there is no other material against the petitioner. Learned Addl.P.P. does not point out any other material against the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, let the petitioner Jai Ram Rai be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dalsinghsarai in connection with Ujiarpur P.S. Case No. 106 of 2009, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Mkr. (C.M. Prasad, J.)