ll^ ^.f^WS W' ••- ;i-^. ] j l|g^ ^ I 1 'kt-.. '*•£'"'''/"•' 1 i'^f-'{" sy IDi-5-ilS PETITIONERS COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PET1TION N0.1044 OF 2003 1. Madia. S/o Late Shobhanath, aged about 70 years. 2. Sarju, S/o Late Bhikhram, aged about 70 years. 3. Sahnibai, W/o Late Ghasiram, aged about 70 years. 4. Bhilau, Slo LaSs Shobhoram, aged about 65 years. 5. Ramu, S/o Late Magantu, aged about 60 years. 6. Ram Prasad, S/o Late Ramnath, aged about60years. 7. Samaru, S/o Late Satau, aged about 60 years. 8. Budhu, S/o Late Ghasia, aged about years. 9. Somaru, S/o Thakurram, aged about 60 M^ss^s^- T?t^;/^ i^iis!S.i^ ?^?| 10. Mohan, S/o Late Tatuk, aged about 60 years. 11. Dev Kunwar, Wto Mangau, aged about 60 years. 12. Sumrit, D/o La$e Chamra, aged about 55 years. 13. Zalsingh, S/o Late Gadaram, aged about 55 vears. 14. Hiralai, S/o Bhudhu, aged about 55 years. 15. Barat, S/o Late Janaka, aged about years. 16. Mangat, S/o Late Bathu, aged about 55 vears. 17. Parwati, W/o Dhurau, aged about 55 yeare. 18. Machhan, S;'o Late Masu, aged about 50 years. 19. Shyamlal, S/o Ramlal, aged about 50 veara. —^J w Thakur RESPONDENTS 20. Stey Singh, S/o Late Mathu, aged about 50 years. 21. Fattey Singh, S/o Pahar Singh, aged about 50 years. 22. Kausalya, W/o Late Rambharosa, aged aboutSOyears. 23. Nirasan, W/o Late Premlal, aged about 40 years. 24. Manglu Ram, S/o LaSe Ramji, aged about 35years. 25. Dashrath, S/o Late Lakhma, aged about 75 years. 26. Manglu, Sto Late Sudhi, aged about 70 All residents of "Johan Nala" (Forest viliage), Tahsil Nagri, District Dhamtari (Chhafflsgarh). Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Raipur 2. The Department of Forest, through the Secretary, Secretariat, Raipur (CG). 3. The Department of Irrigation, through the Secretary, Secretariat, Raipur (CG). ' (Writ petition under Articie 226 & 227 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'bIeShri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 'resent:- None for the pstitioners. Shri Arvind Dubey. Pane! Lawyer for fte State. (Passed on this 3'" day of February, The matter is called for hearing tw-ice. On both occasions, none appears nor is any representation made on behaff of Uie petitioners. The petitioners may not be interested in the matter. 2) In view of the above, the petition is dismissed for want of prosscution. 3) Consequently, M.(W.).P.No.913/2003 stands disposed of. - - Sd/- SatisKK iotn Judge