IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3331 of 2009 1. PARSURAM KUMAR SON OF SRI INDRADEO SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KARPI DAKSHINWARI MATHIA, POST AND POLICE STATION KARPI, DISTRICT ARWAL. 2. SEEMA KUMARI, WIFE OF SRI BINDESHWARI PRASAD MANDAL, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JONHA, POLICE STATION KARPI, DISTRICT ARWAL. 3. UPENDRA PRASAD, SON OF LATE MANDIP SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DASHRATH BIGHA, POST AND POLICE STATION KARPI, DISTRICT ARWAL. 4. UMA KUMAR, SON OF SURESH YADAV. 5. YOGENDRA KUMAR, SON OF MANDIP SINGH, BOTH R/O VILLAGE DASHARATH BIGHA, P.S. KARPI, DISTRICT ARWAL. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SRI ANAND SHANKAR, THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PATNA. 3. SRI NAIYAR HUSNAIN KHAN, THE CHAIRMAN, SELECTION COMMITTEE CUM SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, JEHANABAD. 4. SRI J.S. GAINGBAR, THE CHAIRMAN, SELECTION COMMITTEE CUM SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BHAGALPUR. 5. SRI GANESH PRASAD, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, JEHANABAD. 6. SRI BACHU SINGH MINNA, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BHAGALPUR. For the petitioner : Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State : M/s Pushkar Narain Shahi, AAG-14, Sanjeet Kumar Singh, AC to AAG-14. ----------- 07. 23.03.2011 Opposite party nos.3 and 5 have filed second supplementary, supplementary show cause respectively, which is taken on record. In compliance of the orders of this Court dated 8.7.2009 passed in C.W.J.C. No.7633 of 2009, the Chairman of the Selection Committee constituted for appointment of Constable at Bhagalpur passed order dated 20.2.2011, which is contained in Annexures-C, D to the supplementary show cause filed by opposite party no.6. Similarly the Chairman of the Selection Committee constituted for appointment of Constables at Jehanabad passed order dated 1.2.2011, Annexure-E to 2 the second supplementary show cause filed by opposite party no.3. The discrepancy noticed by this Court under order dated 9.3.2011 passed in the instant case also appears to have been explained by the Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad, opposite party no.5 in the show cause filed today by placing reliance on the vacancy chart of the Homeguard and None-Homeguard category contained in Annexures- B5 and A5. The contempt application is, accordingly, disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to challenge the orders dated 1.2.2011 and 20.2.2011 referred to above. Rajesh/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)