-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.466 OF 2000 Shri.Sitaram Laxman Divekar and Ors. ..Appellants Vs. Shri.Ramchandra Bhikaji Chandorkar and Ors. ..Respondents .... Ms.Gauri Godse for Appellants Mr.Sandesh D.Patil for Respondents 1 to 4 .... CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. DATE : MARCH 31,2005 DATE : MARCH 31,2005 DATE : MARCH 31,2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned counsel for the respective parties state that during the pendency of this appeal, they have arrived at a compromise and the same has been reduced in writing in terms of the consent terms. The consent terms have been duly signed by the respective parties and their advocates and they are present in the Court and state that they have been read over the consent terms and they understood the same. They declared that consent terms have been reduced into writing as per the willingness. They further state that the consent terms would be binding upon them. -2- 2. The learned counsel therefore pray for disposal of the Second Appeal in terms of the consent terms. 3. Prayer granted. Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms which are marked as ‘X’ for identification. 4. Decree be drawn in terms of the consent terms. Civil Applications Nos.5312 of 2000 and 559 of 2005 do not survive and the same are disposed of. [ B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. ]