The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.23210 of 2010 Date: 21-09-2010 Between: Nalubolu Prabhakar Reddy ..... Petitioner AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh and 3 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.R.Thimma Reddy Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue The Court made the following: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to direct the respondents to re-open the case of the petitioner for the purpose of proper classification of the lands and deletion of certain lands owned by the petitioner’s mother. I have heard Sri R.Thimma Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue representing the respondents. The petitioner’s mother and father owned and possessed lands admeasuring Ac.40-57 cents and Ac.35.61 cents respectively in Inamadugu Village of Kovvur Mandal, Nellore District. Declarations were filed in the names of the petitioner’s father and mother under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (for short ‘the Act’). By order, dated 08-11-1976, respondent No.4- Land Reforms Tribunal, Nellore, determined the ceiling limits of the declarants and passed a final order of determination. Feeling aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner filed appeal bearing A.C.No.125 of 1977 before respondent No.3- Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal, Nellore. The said appeal was dismissed by respondent No.3, by its order, dated 09-05-1979, thereby confirming the order of respondent No.4. The present Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner stating that as certain mistakes were committed by both the Primary and Appellate Tribunals, the case deserves to be reopened for re-determination of the land. At the hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner is unable to point out any provision of law, under which an order for re-determination can be made, when the orders of the primary as well as the appellate authorities have attained finality. The petitioner has even failed to avail the revisional remedy under the provisions of the Act. Further more, the petitioner has slept over for a period of more than thirty years and suddenly filed the present Writ Petition. Apart from the relief claimed by the petitioner not being supported by any statutory provision, the Writ Petition suffers from uncondonable laches. For the above-mentioned reasons, the Writ Petition is dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.29614 of 2010, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 21st September, 2010 lur