1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4160/2010 Ladu Ram vs Subodh Kumar & Anr. Date of Order: 12.5.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Sanjay Nahar, for the petitioner. Mr. Suresh Shrimali, for the respondents. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner-tenant is aggrieved against the eviction order passed by the Rent Tribunal, Bhilwara in case no.46/2003 dated 5.9.2006 as well against dismissal of his appeal by the Rent Appellate Tribunal dated 10.4.2010. The two authorities carefully considered the evidence of the parties and, thereafter, found the case of the landlord – respondent genuine case for grant of decree on the ground of personal bonafide necessity as well as on the ground of sub-letting. There is no error of fact and law and, therefore, I do not find any reason to interfere in the above orders. Hence, the writ petition deserves to be dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to evict the suit premises on various grounds and prayed that in identical facts and circumstances for same landlord, this court granted time to vacate the premises upto 30.4.2011. I considered the submission of learned counsel for the 2 petitioner. Looking to the facts of the case, this Court is of the view that the petitioner be granted time upto 30.04.2011 to vacate the premises in question. Therefore, it is ordered that in case, the petitioner furnishes a written undertaking before the trial court within a period of one month from today that he shall hand over the vacant possession to the respondent/landlady by or before 30.04.2011 and shall not part with the possession or sublet the premises in question during this period and shall pay all the arrears of rent and decreetal amount, if due, within a period of two months from today and shall also deposit the rent month by month by 15th day of each succeeding month of his tenancy, in the bank account of the respondent/landlord, particulars of which be supplied to the petitioner, the decree under challenge shall not be executed till 1.05.2011. In case of non-compliance of this order or default in payment of rent mentioned above, the respondent will be free to execute the decree forthwith without obtaining any order from this Court. With the aforesaid concession, this writ petition is dismissed. [PRAKASH TATIA],J. cpgoyal/-