^o HIOH COURT OF CHHATTISaARH, BIUSPUR Wj>.(StNo. 684Qof2Q07 PBTITIONBR8 1 Naval Kumar Oouraha S/o SIui Narayan Prasad Gouraha agc about 42 years, R/o Workmg as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Pnmaiy School, Chaudipara Khokhra, Janjgir- Champa, Block Navagarh, Dlstt- Janjgir-Champa (C,G.) 2 Pavan Singh Chandel S/o SIui Gopi Singh, scged about 36 yeara Working as Assistaat Teacher, Govt Primary School Janpat Primaty School Banari, Block Nav^arh, Distt- Jaajgir-Champa (C.G.) 3 Rajendra Sharma S/0 Shri Kapoorcliaad Shanna, aged about 36 yeara, Workiag as Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primaiy School Suighul, Block Navagarh Distt- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4 Gliuruva Ram Karsha S/o Shri Khedu Ram Karslia, aged about 38 years Workiag as Assistaat Teaoher, Govt Medial School Putpiira, Block Navagarh, Distt- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) S Kush Ram Chandra S/o Shri Trilochan Prasad Chaadra, aged about 38 yeara, Working as Assistaat Teacher Govt Primary School Dharsbjva, Block Nasfaysafb, Distt- Jaajgir-Chainpa (C.<x.) Versus 1 State Govfc of (C.G.) & Through Secretary Educatioiial Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt- Raipur (C.G.) 2 District Education Officer Jaajgjr- Champa (C.G.) 3 Block Educatioii. Officer Navagarh, Distt- Jaajgir-Champa (C.G.) (Writ Petitioa uader Artlde 226 of tbe Constitution ofIinllat RESPONDENTS Appearance: Shri Amit Kuinar Staarma, couascl for the petitioaers. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer, for the State on advance copy. W.P.(S).No.6849 of2007 ORALORDBR (SD V<ttti (17.11.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on admlssion. Learued counsel for fhe petitioners subimts that petitioner No.l has passed B.Ed. exaaunation on. lus own expenses aad petitioners No, 2, 3, 4 &5 have passed B.T.t. exauunation on their own expenses, fhere&re, Ihey are entitied to receive Iwo advaace iacreiaents according to cipculars dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999. He also submits fhat in many identical matters, the petitions have been allowed iu terms of the order passed ia the case of Ydshwmd; Kumiar BhwrwSwe^. 7s. Jffitnictodl Corponttton. JDuw <uid another fSWQ6 SS SSPJK-CG 96?. Hesubmits that fhe case of the petitioiKrs' is squarely covered by fhe said Judgment. This legal position is uot disputed by the fcaracd coiuisel for the State. However, he submits fhat thc order may lie passed iu terms of fhe said judgment, but it shaU be subjccted to verification regarding petitioners' such qualification. Accordiagty, this writ petition is aUowed ia terms of thc order passed ia case of Yashwant Kunwr Wwradwa] Vs. SSurucipal Corporation, Durg and arwiher (Supra) subject to verification of the facts as to whefher the petltioners had acquired B.Ed./B.T.I. Bxamination Certi&cates on fheir own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and fiufher whefher fhey have been paid two axlvance iacrenaents or not. The petition staads GnaSy disposed of. No oriar as to costs. Sd/- . SsnilKumarSinlia Judge ^-