RSA No.2685 of 2009 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.2685 of 2009 Date of Decision: 20-07-2009 Jai Bhagwan ......Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Ms. Preeti Khanna, Advocate, for the appellant. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral). The plaintiff is second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, whereby the suit of the plaintiff claiming regularisation of his services on the post of Beldar with effect from 1.4.1993 when the services of his juniors were regularised, was dismissed. Both the Courts have dismissed the suit of the plaintiff relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka and others v. Uma Devi and others, 2006(4) SCC page 1, holding that the plaintiff was engaged on daily wage basis and as a stop gap arrangement and was appointed in violation of the Rules and Regulations, hence, his services cannot be regularised. Since the findings recorded by the Courts below are in tune RSA No.2685 of 2009 (2) with the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Uma Devi's case (supra) later reiterated recently in Official Liquidator v. Dayanand, (2008) 10 SCC page 1. I do not find any patent illegality or material irregularity in the findings recorded or that the findings recorded give rise to any substantial question of law in the present second appeal. Hence, the present appeal is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 20-07-2009 ds