5° HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH, BILASPUR W.P. (Sl No. 7065 of 2007 PETITIONERS s- RESPONDESNTS 1. Smt. Pushga Singh, Aged 46 years, w/o Shri Anaad. Batiadur Siiigh, LeGturer M.L.B.G.H.S, Rajnandgaon, Distaict Rajnaadgaon(CG) 2. Smt. Padma Khobragada, aged 45 years w/o Shri Gajendra Khopragade, UTD, M.L.B.G.H.S., Rajnaadgaon, District Rajnanadgaon(CG) 3. Smt. Reniika Namdeo, aged 43 years, w/o Shri Mafaesh Namdeo, Lectm-er, M.L.B.G.H.S., Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon(CG) 4. Siat. Moncy Varghese, aged 39 years, w/o Shri Anand Varghese, UDT, M.L.B.G.H.S. Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon(CG) 5. Sint. Ruktaaiu Venna, aged 45 years, w/o Shri B.L. Verma, UDT, M.L.B.G^.H.S. Rajnaadgaoa, District RajnaD.dgaon(CG) 6. Smt. Usha Mislira, aged 47 years, w/o Shri Kasbi Ram Mishra,UDT, M.L.B.G.H.S. Rajnaadgaon, District Rajnaadgaon(CG) 7. Smt. Kiraa Bhatt, a^ed 50 years, w/o Shri C.P. Bhatt, Pruicipal, M.L.B.G.H.S. Rajnaadgaon, District Rajnaadgaon(CG) 8. Sm.t. Saadhya Ku-aa (Masih.) Minz, aged 45 years, w/o Shri L. Minz, Lecturer M.L.B.G.H.S. Rajnaadgaon, District RajnaadgaQn(CG) Versus 1 The State Govenunent of Ghhatdsgarh, Through tfae Secretaiy, School Educatidn ^ Departaient, DKS Bhawan, ^ R£upur(GO) 2 Dlsttict Education Officer, Rajnandgaon(CG) WMTPETITIONUNDERABTICLE^26_OFTHECONSTITUTION OF INNA W.P.(S)No.7065/2007 3\ sunita Appearance: Shri Soinkant Verma, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Paael Lawyer for fhe State on advance copy. . • ORALORDBR (28.11.2007) SUNILKUMARSINHA.J Heard ou adniission. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioners subinits fhat fhe petitioners have passed B.Ed. examination on their own expenses, fherefore, they are entifled to receive two advaace iticrements according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. Healso subiuits that in inaiiy identical laatters, fhe petitions have been allowed ia ferms of the order passed in the case of Ycishwant Kuniar BharaiSwaj Vs. MuniCTpaI CoriMrcCtton, Durfi anci mwtherJ2006SS MPJK-CG 96}. He submits fhat the case of fhe petitiiouers is squarely covered by the said judgment, This legal posiuon is not disputed by the learaed counsel for fhe State. However, he subinits fhat the order inay be passed tn terms of fhe said judgiHent, but it shaU be subjected to verification regarding petitioners' such quaiification. Accordiagly, this writ petition is allowed in tenas of fhe oider passed ia case of Yashwanl Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Munidpal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to verification ofthe facts as to whefher the petitioners had acquired B.Ed. Examination Certificates on tlieir own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 aud furfher whethertheyhave been paid two advaace increm.eBts or not. The petition staitds finaUy disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sunil KumarSinha Judge ia sa •a us ^:.'