Cri. W. P. 38/2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 38 OF 2011 Dhairyasheel s/o. Madhavrao Ghatge ....Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent. Ms. R.P. Gour, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. D. V. Tele, APP for respondents. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & T. V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATED : 24th March, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned counsel for both parties. 2. By this application, the petitioner prays for directions to respondents to release him on parole, who filed an application with the authorities on 11.10.2010 which was received by them on 15.10.2010 with request to release him on parole. The said request was rejected on the basis of the material placed before the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad. One of the reasons for refusing the request of petitioner was that in past while he was released on parole, he overstayed the release period by 210 days and 60 days respectively and thereafter surrendered. The petitioner was released on furlough earlier, but he surrendered 89 days late after expiry of furlough. Cri. W. P. 38/2011 2 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s mother is not well. Though the petitioner’s brother is there to look after her, the petitioner’s presence is required. 4. From the material placed before us, we find that the petitioner’s application was filed before five months. The impugned order is reasoned one. We do not find any error or perversity. In exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction we are not inclined to interfere. The petition is dismissed. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] [ NARESH H. PATIL, J.] ssc/criwp38.11