IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1128 of 2010 PRADEEP KUMAR, S/O- ANIL PRASAD, R/O- VILLAGE GANPAT BIGHA, P.S.- HILSA, DISTRICT- NALANDA UNDER THE GUARDIANSHIP OF FATHER ANIL PRASAD. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ansarul Haque, APP. ----------- 3 20.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is juvenile in conflict with law and facing charge/accusation punishable under diverse sections of Indian Penal Code including Sections 302 and 201 IPC. An F.I.R. was lodged against unknown. In course of investigation, certain incriminating materials were collected against the petitioner leading to filing of charge-sheet. It is contended that the petitioner is in Remand Home since 18.2.2010. The father of the petitioner has affirmed the present affidavit filed along with the application and has taken upon himself responsibility to ensure that the petitioner, if released on bail, will be taken full care of by him. A report from the concerned District Probation Officer was called for which is placed at Flag-A. The Probation Officer having made detail verifications about the petitioner and his family did not find any criminal history or activities against the petitioner. It is seen therefrom that the father of the petitioner is earning his livelihood by private tuition and is ready and wiling to ensure that the petitioner does not fall in the 2 company of bad elements. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and after considering the materials on record including the impugned order and the report at Flag-A, this Court is persuaded to direct release of the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Juvenile Justice Board, Biharsharif at Nalanda in connection with Juvenile Justice Board Case No. 34 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors shall be father of the petitioner. (ii) It shall be the duty of the father to monitor conduct of his son and to produce him before the Court as and when directed therefor. In case of default in such production, the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (iii) During the subsistency of the present privilege of bail, if it is found that the petitioner is found involved in any other criminal case, the same shall be treated as a breach of condition of bail entailing cancellation. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J)