IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1292 of 2006 KARU SAO & ANR Versus KEDAR TAMOLI & ORS ----------- 2 25.7.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. This Court having perused the plaint and the amendment sought in the plaint by an application filed in the month of February, 2004 is satisfied that on account of the proposed amendment neither the nature of suit is going to be changed nor any prejudice would be caused to the defendants who have filed written statement in the year, 2002. The impugned order passed by the Court below infact is a cryptic order and discloses no reason for reaching to its conclusion as to how pr4oposed amendment in the plaint would change the nature of the suit. Accordingly this Court would allow this civil revision application and would set aside the impugned order by allowing the amendment sought to be made by the plaintiffs. However keeping in view that the suit is of the year 1996 and defendants have been put to some sort of harassment on account of the amendment being allowed at a belated stage, this Court would award a cost of Rs. 3,500/- to be paid by the petitioners to the defendant opposite parties in this period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)