IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10183 of 2007 Raghunath, Son of Late Bhola Prasad Sharma, Resident of Village – Mauja Malikana, Police Station- Sariya, District – Muzaffarpur. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 4. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 5. The District Education Officer, Sitamarhi. 6. The Treasury Officer, Sitamarhi. ----------- 5 07.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. Learned counsel for State Sri Madhukar Mishra, learned AC to GA No. 9 submits that during the pendency of the writ petition all the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed. On 5.7.2011 when the case was called out none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. On the said date on behalf of the respondent/Accountant General, Bihar, Patna specific submission was made that during the pendency of the writ petition pension, gratuity and commuted value of pension had already been authorised. In view of the fact that almost all the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed there is no need to further keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of. However, it is made clear that if still any claim which has been made in the writ petition is pending the petitioner would be at liberty to approach this court again. With above observation and direction the writ petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)