CLCON No. 9 of 2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Heard Sri U.S. Bakhuni, Advocate for the petitioner and perused the record. By way of this contempt petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, the petitioner has prayed to punish the respondent for violating the order dated 05.09.2008 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 98 (M/S) of 2006, Smt. Khimuli Devi Vs Mohan Singh Karayat & another. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent – Mohan Singh Karayat is not complying the order dated 05.09.2008 whereby this Court has directed the respondent to pay a sum of Rs. 800/- per month regularly to the petitioner along with arrear within a period of three months, but he did not comply the same, as yet. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner at great length as well as perusing the judgment and order passed by this Court, I am of the view that at this stage, there is no need to summon the respondent under the Contempt of Court Act. It is clear from the perusal of the impugned judgment and order that this Court has granted the liberty to the petitioner to proceed against the respondent by way of execution, if he would not comply the order passed by this Court. I do not find any contempt of Court at this stage. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as going through the impugned order, I do not find any ground to summon the respondent to show cause. I do not find any contempt of court in this case. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed in-limine. (B.C.K., J.) 09.01.2009 ASWAL