IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 11259 of 2008 Between: A.C. Konda Reddy S/o. Chinna Subbi Reddy R/o. Lekkalavaripalli Village, Mydukur Mandal, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State Election Commission rep. by its Commissioner, Andhra Pradesh, Secunderabad, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector-cum-District Election Authority (Gram Panchayat), Kadapa. 3 The District Panchayat Officer-cum-Additional District Election Authority (Gram Panchayat), Kadapa, Kadapa District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in proposing to issue election notification in the 1st week of June 2008 to Ganjikunta Gram Panchayat in Mydukur Mandal of Kadapa District even without rectifying the anomalies as illegal, unjust, arbitrary and against Section 7 of the A.P. Panchayatraj Act 1994 and consequently direct the respondents to hold the Gram Panchayat elections to Ganjikunta Gram Panchayat in Mydukur Mandal of Kadapa District in the regular Gram Panchayat elections to be held in the year 2011 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.L.J.VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 11259 of 2008 O R D E R: This writ petition was filed on 26-05-2008 seeking a declaration that the alleged action of the respondents in proposing to issue election notification to Ganjikunta Grampanchayat in Mydukur Mandal of Kadapa Distrit is illegal and arbitrary. However, when this matter is taken up today, it is brought to my notice by the learned Government Pleader that subsequently election notification was issued on 02-06-2008. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Having regard to the fact that the election notification has already been issued, interference by this Court is not warranted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, this shall not preclude the petitioner to work out the appropriate remedy as available under law, in case he is aggrieved by the out come of the elections. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI,J Date: 10-06-2008 KLP