IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31600 of 2008 PARMANAND DAS @ PARMANAND CHAUPAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR For the Petitioner:- Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate For the State:- Mr. J. S.P. Singh A.P.P. ----------- 3 18.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case has been registered under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation as per the First Information Report against the petitioner is that he has taken Rs. 1,15,000/- as advance, but his work has been assessed as only Rs. 1,07,385/- and as such he has not completed the work of Rs. 7,615/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is apparent from the First Information Report itself that substantial work has been done and petitioner is being falsely implicated in this case. Even if the allegations are taken to be correct then only work of Rs.7,615/- is merely pending. Learned counsel for the State submits that work of Rs. 7,615 has not been done by the petitioner. Therefore, he has been made accused. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the submissions made on behalf of the parties, I direct the petitioner 2 namely, Parmanand Das @ Parmanand Chaupal, to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 150 of 2002. P.K. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)