IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 24TH OCTOBER 2011 / 2ND KARTHIKA 1933 RP.No. 779 of 2011() ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC. 27277/2011 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. ......... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER -------------------------------------------------------- U.A.RAFEEQUE, S/O. U.H.AHAMMED, ASIYAS COTTAGE, IST SIGNAL ROAD, UDAYAVAR, MANJESHWAR P.O., KASARAGOD. BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------ 1. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KASARAGOD-671 121. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE, PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, MUSEUM JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KASARAGOD-671 121. 4. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASARAGOD-671 121. BY SR.GOVT. PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASHREE THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... R.P.779/2011 in W.P.(C).27277/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 24th day of October, 2011 ORDER In the writ petition, the prayer (c). was for a direction to respondents 1 and 4 to grant the petitioner a temporary licence considering Ext.P9 application made by him. However, while disposing of the writ petition directing reconsideration of the appeal filed by the petitioner, the aforesaid prayer was not considered. To that extent, there is an error in the judgment. 2. Therefore, the Review Petition is disposed of directing that on the production of a copy of this order, the fourth respondent will consider Ext.P9 application made by the petitioner for a temporary licence. 3. Petitioner to produce a copy of this order before the fourth respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs