IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.1879 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision: 15.02.2011 Murti Devi …..Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ……Respondents CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon’ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr.P.R.Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) CM No.2310 of 2011 Application allowed, document annexed with it is taken on record. CWP No.1879 of 2011 By filing this writ petition, challenge has been laid to the notifications, issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short, the Act) on 18.12.2008 and 17.12.2009, respectively. It is primary contention of the petitioner that except the land falling in Khasra No.207//251 min, in which the petitioner has raised her residential house, rest of her land, was not subject matter of notification, issued under Section 4 of the Act. It is further contention of the petitioner that without notifying the land, the authorities are trying to take its possession. If that is so, this writ petition is not a proper remedy. The petitioner may avail any other remedy, as per law. Civil Writ Petition No.1879 of 2011(O&M) Faced with the situation, counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this writ petition to avail any other remedy, as per law. Ordered accordingly. (Jasbir Singh) Judge 15.02.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) gk Judge 2