..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.916 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3753 OF 2006 1.Deepak Jhunjhunwala, & 2.Suresh Jhunjhunwala. ...Applicants. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra. ...Respondent. .... Mr.R.G.Merchant, Adv. for Applicants. Mr.Rajesh More, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 18th April, 2007. DATED : 18th April, 2007. DATED : 18th April, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. The applicants have made two prayers in this application. The first prayer is for waiver of the condition of depositing the sum of Rs.5,00,000/- with the BMC; and the second prayer is for relaxation of condition of attendance of the applicants before the office of Economics Offences Wing Unit - III, Mumbai. 3. The learned APP, on instructions states ..(2).. that as far as prayer for relaxation of attendance is concerned, there is no objection to the said condition being relaxed. Hence, I am inclined to modify the said condition. Instead of the applicants reporting to Economic Offences Wing, Unit-III, Mumbai once in a fortnight, the applicants shall report as and when required by the Economic Offences Wing, Unit-III, till conclusion of the trial. 4. As far as the first prayer of waiver of condition of depositing Rs.5,00,000/- with the BMC is concerned, it is seen that the amount is to be deposited with the BMC. However, BMC is not a party to the present application. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant the said prayer in the present application. However, liberty is granted to the applicants to prefer a separate application for waiver of the said condition after adding BMC as party respondent. 5. Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)