o.'' c^ SINGLEBEWCrt IN THE HON'BLE HI&H COURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR PETCTIONER WRIT PETCTION (S) N0.^.l/.../2010 Smt. Urmila Sidar, wife of Shri Mangal Singh Sidar, aged about 46 years, (U.T.b.), R/o. village Bulaki, Via Kondatarai, District Raigarh, at present working in 6ovt. Pre- Middle School, Ruchida, Block Pusour, District Raigarh (C.6.), VERSUS RESPONDENTS /^" 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Education Depart- ment, &.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.), Y^..^l-^gi.--"' 2. District Educatin Officer, Raigarh, ^ X'S-fy District Raigarh (C.e.), ^....•^\)? ..•"";»»"'\1?-'' /•"' ..A'- ..^ ^.f"' .-•"' 3. ' Block Education Officer, Pusour, District Raigar-h (C.G.) WRIT PETETCON UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE COUNSTETUTEON OF INDIA 3 i -»'<*^-«-'-l-liji -jitJ-1-l-k-lftn I+ ^a^">_M»t<~lj''SM' ^ XI-HG—78 ^ST •<ii'4i(rt<t, eitil^'is, fsidiyy -P- C^ ^- G.oilf k ~{f% 200 sn^T 'T^£K('^3^?) 311^1'Wfii-fi'* ^ff STT^T sh*l ^IIWHft? Sf^W ' A •A •V* Shri. S.S.Patel, coun.sel for Sint, Smita Ghai, P.L. for ti Counsel for ftie petitioner entitled to benefit of two advaaci haviag passed D.Ed. exainiaatioii own cost. It is sufciajtted tliat th4 petition. is no longer res integra decided bv the HonTale Suprem.! (he petitioner. State. ^iubuuts tha.t the petitioner is increinents on account of he after her appoiri.tm.ent at aer issue involved ttl the present had the sam.e has been fiiiaily Court ia ftie case of Asha {SCS 59. It is farfher submitted tha| sinular view ia its order dated 6| 6257/ 2008. Counsel for the peti1| order dated 29..4.2010 passed i| wherein relying upon fhe judgiae^ case ofAsha Saxeaa (supra) Emd| ia another Writ Appea] No. S^ issued for consideration of the iacreiuents as per circular dated] of Madhya Pradesh, after verifica) petition. subifaits Counsel for the State subi would also be considered on fhe i <M<i[<n*4lt 'RTO^fT ^f f^l Tf^T^H ^afRnsn^r t this Coiirt has also taken a ^2.2009 passed in W.P.fS) No. ioner further subiuits fbat the ^1 Writ Appeal N0. 124/2009, it oftheSupisiue Coiirt ia the Iftie order passed by ttus Court /2009. directions have been 'ase for grant of two advance 21.9.1974 issued bv the State ttoa offh.e lacts pleaded m the tliat case of the petitioner ame Unes. XI-HC—78 z6 l^ *11*<<^1 ^iW^ ~3^T •<ll<<!d'4, ®tll'y'|ia,fqolK-l^ J. (? CS>') O^- £aH 1 (, •"V^200 3^i '^^' ('Yii'i'5'^) TCiiwflfeisn^i In view of above, the pe1 direction to fhe respondent aufhorfl petitioner for graat of two advan< dated 21.9.1974 issued by ftie Sfate verification of the facts pleaded in eight weeks from today. |tion is disposed of wifh a Ities to decide the clami offhe [e increinents as per circular of Madhya Pradesh after |±iepetition wifhin. a period of ct)N[(Ti4)vrf^^ ^ fi^ <rjT^f< ^? aifgii 3iit?i Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge