Criminal Misc. No. M-15612 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-15612 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.7.2011 Parminder Kaur .. Petitioner v. State of Punjab .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. K. K. Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Abhishek Chautala, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. ... Rajesh Bindal J. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner had placed on record affidavit of the complainant stating that the matter in dispute has been compromised. The FIR was got registered on account of money transaction, which was primarily a civil dispute. The money has been returned to the complainant. Time was granted to learned counsel for the State to verify the factum of compromise. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from Head Constable Sarabjit Singh, stated that though the factum of compromise has been ascertained but the statement of the complainant is yet to be recorded to that effect. Considering the aforesaid facts, in my opinion, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. He is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on 28.7.2011 at 10.0 AM. In case of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. He shall appear before Criminal Misc. No. M-15612 of 2011 [2] the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investigation. He shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 14.7.2011 mk