[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.339 OF 2008 WITH REVN.APPLN.NO.447 OF 2002 Shabirali Mazharali Khan ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents ... Mr.Niranjan Mundargi advocate for applicant Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh A.P.P. for the State Mr.M.A.Saiyd Adv. for Respondent no.2 ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant-original accused, the learned advocate for the respondent-original complainant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The applicant and respondent-original complainant are present in Court. 2. By judgment and order dated 16.8.2008, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 30th Court, Kurla, Mumbai convicted the applicant under Section 420 of IPC in CC No.2275/P/1990. The appeal preferred by [-2-] the applicant came to be dismissed by the learned Sessions Judge, hence, this revision. 3. During the pendency of the revision application, the parties have amicably settled the dispute. Respondent no.2-original complainant has filed an affidavit wherein it is stated that the dispute has been amicably resolved and in view of the settlement, the complainant has no objection if the offence is compounded and the applicant is acquitted thereunder. In view of the above facts and the affidavit, permission is granted to compound the offence and the applicant is acquitted thereunder. Bail bonds of the applicant shall stand cancelled. 4. Application and Revision Application are disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]