1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4293 OF 2001 WRIT PETITION NO. 4293 OF 2001 WRIT PETITION NO. 4293 OF 2001 Harad Rekha Balkrishna and Ors. ... Petitioners Versus State of Mah. and Ors. ... Respondents Ms. Kirti Kokil i/by R.N. Sanghvi for Petitioners. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, A.G.P. for R. No. 1. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DATED : JANUARY 27, 2006 DATED : JANUARY 27, 2006 DATED : JANUARY 27, 2006 P.C. . On 19.1.2006 when the matter was called out, the learned counsel sought time. Time was granted. Today when the matter is called out, further time is sought. Considering the relief sought for in the petition, application for adjournment rejected. Petitioners were admitted in the D.Ed. college not recognised by N.C.T.E. The college Respondent No. 3 admitted 100 students. It appears that N.C.T.E. thereafter granted permission for 50 students. The petitioners were not amongst them. By the present petition, they pray that the examination be held 2 for them for D. Ed. examination. . The Petition was filed in the year 2001. We are now in the year 2006. The relief as prayed for now cannot be granted. If the Petitioners seek any relief against Respondent No. 3, it will be open for them to pursue that independently and the disposal of this petition will not stand in their way. With above observations, Petition rejected. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.)