IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 619 OF 2006 SHRI. DHARMA FATI SHIDDEKAR ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 35 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Mahesh Sonak, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, AG with Ms. L. Kamat Dharwadkar, AGA for the Respondents. Coram:- S.A.BOBDE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 26th March, 2007 ORAL JUDGMENT Rule, returnable early. 2. Heard. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has been selected for appointment, however, no appointment order is issued to him as yet. In the circumstances, the respondents are directed to issue a formal appointment order forthwith. The petitioner shall be appointed subject to medical clearance. 4. In view of this direction, nothing survives in the Petition. Rule disposed of accordingly. S.A.BOBDE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. arp/*