IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2009 / 15TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 36231 of 2008(L) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- P.T. JOSE, AGED 58, S/O.THOMA, PONPARAMBIL HOUSE, WADAKKANCHERRY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR), SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN. RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE WADAKKANCHERRY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, P.O. WADAKKANCHERRY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SECRETARY, WADAKKANCHERRY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, WADAKKANCHERRY.P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. R1 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.J. MOHAMMED ANZAR, R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.36231/2008-L: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED TO P.V. THOMAS DTD. 25/03/53. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED TO P.V. THOMAS DTD. 02/02/52. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED TO P.V. THOMAS DTD. 18/12/76. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED TO P.V. THOMA DTD. 22/05/78. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE CONSUMER METER CARD DTD. 25/03/50 IN THE NAME OF P.V. THOMA. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE ELECTRICITY BILL IN THE NAME OF P.V. THOMA DTD. 15/01/62. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE BUILDING TAX RECEIPT DTD. 20/01/78. EXT.P.8: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE R.2. DTD. 18/12/07 IN THE NAME OF THE FATHER OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P.9: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.2. DTD. 03/11/2008. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. prv. S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ----------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 36231 OF 2008 (L) -------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by threat of dispossession from certain buildings, which the petitioner claims belong to him and the Panchayath claims belong to them. The learned standing counsel for the Panchayath submits that the Panchayath has no intention to forcibly evict the petitioner and that they would not be dispossessed except in accordance with due process of law. This is recorded and the writ petition is closed. The contentions of the parties are left open to be agitated, if necessary again. Sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE skr // True copy // P.A. to Judge.