WP(C) 2255/2011 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H BARUAH Heard Mr. K.K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner who has been empo wered by the petitioner to appear on his behalf in this petition as well as Mrs. U. Gogoi, learned senior standing counsel, Water Resources. As agreed to by the learned counsel of both the parties, this writ petit ion is taken up for disposal at the motion stage. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has been provided with 3 (thr ee) work orders for supply of galvanised wire netting sheet made of 8 SWG wire 1 52 mm square of quantity @ Rs. 307/- per sheet by the Addl.Chief Engineer (L.A.Z .), Water Resources Deptt., Ghy-3. Pursuant to the work order he supplied the af oresaid quantity and submitted the bill (3 in numbers) for Rs. 10,36,125/- (rupe es ten lakhs thirty six thousand one hundred twenty five) only in all but despit e submission of the bills the appropriate authority has not paid the amount as i ndicated in the bills despite his approach to the concerned authority. It is submitted at the bar that such payment of the contractors bill and manner and method to be dealt with in such case has been rendered by a full be nch of this court in W.A. No. 484 of 2008 (Tamsher Ali and Ors. -Vs- State of As sam and Ors.) and similar other 194 Writ Petitions dated 29.9.2008 and the issue involved in the instant case is covered by the aforesaid decision. In view of the facts involved and the decision rendered by this court in W.A. No. 484 of 2008, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that t he petitioner as well as the respondents shall be bound by the laws and directio ns as laid in the case (supra) by the full bench of this court and the responden ts authority shall deal with the grievance of the petitioner as per direction re ferred to and pay the amount to the petitioner to which he is entitled. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.