IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC NO.888 OF 2009 SURYADEO SAH VERSUS 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR 3. IGP, MUNGER RANGE 4. DIG, MUNGER 5. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,, JAMUI 6. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,, JAMUI 7. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, JAMUI 8. DDC, JAMUI 9. SDO, LAXMIPUR 10. BDO, LAXMIPUR 11. SHO, LAXMIPUR. ----------- 2 22.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has come to this Court for quashing F.I.R. of Laxmipur Police Station case no. 150 of 2008 lodged against him without holding proper enquiry and verifying the matter resulting into his arrest. Learned counsel for the State submits that though the FIR discloses allegations against the petitioner, but as the charge sheet has not been submitted, he may represent to the IO of the case. In the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with observation to the petitioner to represent to the IO who would look into the matter in accordance with law. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)