IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1856 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- ABDULKADAR JANMAHAMMAD Versus SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MRS KETTY A MEHTA for Petitioner MR BP TANNA,Sr. Adv. with MR NIKHIL KARIEL for Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 21/12/1999 ORAL JUDGEMENT Though if it would have been necessary for me to decide the matter on merits, I have my own reservation whether the orders could have been maintained but looking to the fact that for one reason or the other, the interim relief continues in favour of the petitioner and the matter pertains where the Corporation has ordered for demolition of four storeyed building, it is in the larger interest of the parties, that this petition may be disposed of in the terms that the learned trial court may dispose of the suit itself finally which is of the year 1991 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of writ of this order. Compliance of this order has to be reported to this court. Rule and civil revision application stand disposed of accordingly. Liberty is granted to the respondent for revival of this civil revision application in case the suit is not decided within four months. *********** zgs/-