IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO.,^^2^2004 ^- PETITIONER .6' ^/ ''x'^C-' .•"rtc-y ^ ••>*' w^ csf'^y /s^&" ^ >"' ;u. ..^ f ..<•' .<^?> <Ny RESPONDENTS E^- s^^i S-Ss;%3E .-;ff.!^ ISsiieiK^S'3? Chandrahas Sahu S/o Shri Bodhan Singh Sahu, aged about 47 yeara, Assistant teacher posted at Govt. Middle School Belardona, Block- Magarlod, Tahsil-Kurud, Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.) Resident of Village-Bharda^ Post - Magarlod, Tehsil-Kurud & Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Education Departnient D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The District Education officer Dhamatari, Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.) 3. The Block Education officer Dhamatari, Dist Dhamatari (CG.) 4. Khemlal Nagwanshi, Assistant teacher posted at primaiy school Kamaipur, Block-Magrlod, Tahsil- Kurud, Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CEERTIORARI, MANDAMUS .PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WMT OR WMTS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERES: ^A p. ^ XI-HC-22 311^1 q? h-u* an^T st)*ii<ft ^ifiti .--' T«?-(<l<<l<"t<<, afll^'i®,fs«'ii'yy 3TT^?T 'V^K h/i^A(o<-2^3g'/S^°' •T'^1 2t) Hwnf (bllch fq^T' an^i ^sirattto 26-8-2004 On a mention being made, this ca^e is taken up. Petitioner/sbyShri g. g. PCL&^. ftdvow^. Stafe by Shri V.V.S. Murthy, I^y. Advocate General, with Shri Satish Gupta, D)'.G.A, and SKri Akhil .Agrawal and Ship Sandeep Dubey, Panel Lavvyers. Heard. ~ ' - The matter relates to transfer oft}}e petitioner from the respective place. Counsel for the petitioner/s subm| effected illegally in contravention of law ^nd policy State counsel opposed it. State counsel submitted that thd without seni'ina notice tor aemand ot' iust opinior. on' the merits of the case. in the his/lier grievances and grounds before th respondents along with a copy of the peti ^iN?pft;T iinaf ^'fe'zt Tf^re?re ^; 3iP<n sn^r tted that the transter ofthe petitioner/s has been petitioner/s has straightway filed the petition jce and represemation. Having heard and considered t(ie rivai con'entions, withoui expressing any opimon ofthis Coiirt, ends c'juu'.icf v.'ili be served il a direction is given to the petisioner.'s to make detailed representaticn rsisir^ ^ State Govemment'competent authoniy of' the (ion and this order, within 10 da'.'s. arid on such liuiient'eompetent authonty 01 the rsspondents. .•rpitserri.aLion ocuig iiiea; me .5iaic aovc.j under the law, shall consider and decide the same on its own ments in accordaaca wrth law as early as possible preferably wrd-iir| of the represeniation. If any contraventjion of policy or guidelines is brought to the notice. the same be considered on its ovvTikTierits. Counsel for the petitioneps prays an}' grievance of the petitioner's remaini available under the law. It is open to the p iaw. 'A'ith the aforesaid obsen'ations, tljiis petition stands di.sposed oi'. Consequently M.W.P., ii any\ alsc six weeks from the date of receipt'piuducuon that after the decision of the reDresentaiion if 1. he/she mav be allov/ed EO avail the resnedv Istitioner to avail the remedv availabii under the stands disposed of CertiFied copy as per rules. Copy to State counsel for compliahce. Sd(- Fakhruddin judge &i|A.illiiU.: it.,*Mi ,iir-nttii(»1]Uli|i[1