Q^ IN THE JfOJVBLf HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR W.P. f c) No. 3^ /20I2 »-'" PETITIONBR ^?^ ^y .^.-^•^ ...-"'.ts^' k..>" ^••"^~ ...-••" <ey>' ^^ RBSPOND^NTS Shatrughan Das S/0 Mandas Aged about 68 years Occupation Kotwar R/0 Villag^ Jhanjh Tahsil Aarang DiSPS, Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS <' (1) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary , Department of Revenue Mantralaya,D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur ( C.G.) (2) Collctor, Raipur Dist-Raipur (C.G.) ^h^ (3) Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Raipur Dist RaipurfC.G.) (4)chief Executive Officer v fVS' [^("TT'- €) New Raipur Development Authority Telibandha Jedhi Vila Near Natioanl Garage Ring Road Raipur Dist Raipur ( C.G.) (5) Nazul Officer Capitdl Area Development Authority Raipur ( Chhattisgarh ) WKJT PETITION UNPER ARTICLB 2^6/227 OF THS CONSTITUTtON OF iftDIA i/',3a. 'i t ^^s^. K ^y^ ii '"^^' ] S wve../A- %y ^' / HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRTT PET1TION (C) No. 3649 of2011 Shatroghan Das. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Othws. WMT PETmON UMDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA 8B: Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Aemhotri. J. Present: 81m Atul Paiidey, Advoeate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General forthe State/ respondent No. lto3. Shri SumeA Baj^, Advocate for flie respondent No. 4. ORDE2RCORAL) (Passed on 12th day ofJuly,2011) Leamed counsel appearing for Ihe petftioner submits that the respondents may be direeted to consider aad decide the representation ofthe petitioner for aUoitment ofaltemative land in conapliance ofthe directions ofthe Adarsh Rehabilitati<m poliiy of the Chhattisgarii State, 2007 and Ifaereafter, acquire Ihe land g-anted to the petitioner, as service land. Shri Pandey further subniits titat in an identical matter i.e. Kotwar Association ofChattisgarh v. State ofChhattisgarh & Others^, this Court has disposed of the petifion of Ifae Kotwar Associatan by giving fhe members an opportunity to file individual applications/ representations witfa a direction to consider and decide the same in accordance wdtn law and in aceordance with the provisions ofthe Adarsh Rehabilitation policy of Ifae Chhattisgarh State, 2007. Thus, this petition may also be disposed ofinthe same tenns. '• W.P.(p) No. 7524/2009, decided on 12.01.2ui0 ^ 3. Leamed counsel appearing for other side do not controvert the above submission and submit that they have no objeetion if the petition is disposed of in tenns of Ifae order passed in Kotwar Association ofChhattisgarh (supra) 4. In view of fhe above suhmissions made bv leamed coinisel appearing for Ifae parties, this petition is disposed ofin tenns ofthe order passed in Kotwar Association ofChhattisgarh (supra) i.e. fhe petitioner may file a fresh application befare fhe appropriate autiiority ia accordance with law for graut of patta/allotment of land and tfsuch application is filed, it shall be disposed efby the concemed autiiority in accordance witfi Ihe revenue laws and also keeping in mind the provisions ofthe Adarsh Rehabilitation poliey ofthe CMattisgarh State, 2007. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit