1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4716/2007 (Ram Narayan Dayama Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.) Date of Order : : 08.08.2007 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. KRISHAN KUMAR ACHARYA, J. Mr.I.R.Choudhary, for the petitioner. BY THE COURT:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was suspended by Disciplinary Authority vide order dated 21.10.2005 without any reason. He was informed about the reason of suspension after 13 months of suspension period vide memorandum dated 29.11.2006. It is further stated that petitioner has been allowed only 50% subsistence allowance whereas he is entitled for 75% subsistence allowance. He has already submitted various representations before the respondents but still no order has been passed. Learned counsel for the 2 petitioner states that petitioner has also challenged the suspension order in this writ petition. I have considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the material placed on record. Looking to all the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition can be disposed of by directing the petitioner to make a fresh detailed representation to the respondents ventilating his grievances. In this view of the matter, the petitioner is directed to submit a fresh detailed representation before the concerned authority for enhancement of the subsistence allowance and other reliefs, who shall decide the same positively within a period of one month therefrom as per rule. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (KRISHAN KUMAR ACHARYA), J. NK