IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2312 of 2008 Date of decision:24.02.2009. M/s Vijay Kumar Mahesh Kumar Const. co. ...Petitioner Versus Punjab Water Supply & Sewerage Board and others ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. P.S.Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. (ORAL) None has entered appearance to resist the petition. It is apparent from the impugned order that the Arbitrator declined to proceed with the arbitration by observing that the reference was time- barred. Clauses 25(i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) indicate the relevant dates with effect from which the limitation is to be calculated. The Arbitrator did not notice whether the Clauses aforementioned had been complied with or not. In the light thereof, the petition is disposed with a direction to the Arbitrator to pass an order afresh in terms of the arbitration Clauses 25(i), (ii), (iii) and (iv). This exercise shall be concluded within one month from today. February 24, 2009 (S.D.Anand) vinod Judge