1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4969/2008 Ram Lal Deegwal Versus State of Rajasthan and others DATE OF ORDER --- MAY 18, 2009 PRESENT HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PREM SHANKER ASOPA Mr.Lokesh Sharma, for the petitioner BY THE COURT (1) Heard learned counsel for the parties. (2) This Court has recorded the following order on 24.4.2009: “Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been exonerated thrice and the Disciplinary Authority has disagreed with the report of the Enquiry Officer. Now again the Disciplinary Authority has disagreed with the finding of the Enquiry Officer which clearly amounts to harassment. Counsel for the State wants some time to further study the matter and make his submissions on the aforesaid issue. List on 28.4.2009.” (3) Thereafter, time was granted to the respondentS on 28.4.2009 but no specific affidavit has been filed. (4) I have gone through record of the writ 2 petition and further considered the submission of counsel for the parties. (5) I am of the view that once the petitioner has been exonerated thrice, there appears to be no justification to enquire into the same matter again for the fourth time by holding de novo enquiry. (6) In view of the above, the enquiry report is accepted and the respondents are directed to act accordingly. (7) The writ petition is disposed of as indicated above. (Prem Shanker Asopa) J. Gopal