IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41528 of 2010 1. RAMBRIKSHA RAI 2. RAMAKANT RAI ------------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. There was talk to sell certain area of plots but by co-accused Sakaldeo Rai for petitioners’ land also. Petitioner no.2 is alleged for receiving Rs. 5,00,000/- which he is denying and an F.I.R. vide Gardanibagh P.S. Case No. 88/10 is also lodged for the same. Receipt if bears no signature of petitioner no.2 no case is made out, if that bears signature of petitioner no.2, the matter is serious fixing criminal liability but without ascertaining the reality refusal of anticipatory bail is not justified. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail till observation of the court below basing expert’s opinion about bearing of receipt signature of petitioner no.2, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 2 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in Complaint Case No. 1655©/08, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)