' — ‘' 17/ ggmgkg §am¥a : wtkmnar Agrawal, Sfo Rosychand Agawai, Aged about §g years, Oocupaiion -— Bism Rio Sada: Bazar, Raigar, Tah & Distt. — Raigarh (C. G.) : Shri PsiVate Shiv Ltd, Shakti Chakradharpm‘, SYael Tah RESPONDENTS w & mm ‘Raigarh(C.G.). Through .J‘‘A ‘ ihe Mimi, Chai sfo Jay1a1 Shri Wax, Kgdar Nath aged . W . M m about 44 years, 13erxrment Address ~— 1m EQmj aiya Dhanbad (Jlwxlmd) Presentiy Rasidahg — Nam, itwari Bazat, dat Baa, Rsigrbv Tah. & Distt. Ragarh (C.G.) Shri Sushii Kmnar, Sfo Shn' Wtthuram Agrawa}, aged abeut 36 years, ccuation — 3Jsimss, Rz’Q Sada: Bazar, Raigarh Tah. 81, Disit. Raigarh (CG) State Of Chhanisgar hrough The CoElector Raigarh, Hm Raigarh (CG) ‘ WEISCELLANEGUS AFFEAL UNDER ORDER 43 w” RULE 1L'\%)F Y QRC 1%? §% EIGIi CQIJRE 6F JEEE€A§§EE A? EEAS?E§E M A N9. i l0F 2003 APPELLANT w h VERSUS . M k Sa . Op h T 311wm (W) mam§wm $at%qané&1 mmmanw SB. Hon’ble Shri Justice N.K. Aqarwai t 17.2.2Q19 Shrj Sanjeev Banjare, Advocate for appellant. Shri SRJ Jaiswal, Ad ate fer respandent No‘ 1. Shri Sameer Behar, P 1e? Lawyer for State. Learned counsel appe ring fer appeuant submits that with i has become infruotuaue. the passage of time this ap p Accordingiy, the appe l is dismissed as having became infructuous. No order asto s. appiioations, stand disposed of. M(C)P No. 1 980/03 aiso stan s disposed of. Consequently, pendi c t séi‘ / i /_/,7 r Aga‘“a\ Sahu L7 ; N_ ‘(u gudge /’// G v n 31m ewe .. .......i.%’$.i9\ ............. «a 2002 . Qg