W.P. No. 987 of 2004 (M/B) Hon. V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J. Hon. Irshad Hussain, J. Heard Mr. A.K. Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. B.P. Nautiyal, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 and Mr. D.K. Sharma, learned Government Advocate for the State. Learned public prosecutor makes a statement that the Investigating Officer does not intend to arrest the petitioner in the afore- mentioned offence registered by him, at least for the present. In that view, the writ petition has become infructuous. However, ultimately if the Investigating Officer decides to arrest the petitioner, then, 7 days’ notice shall be given to the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. (IH, J.) (VSS, C.J.) 11.10.2004 11.10.2004 G