1 'l V COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR \v PETmONERS WRIT PETmON (S} No. 207 of2009 1. Shiv Nath Kallo Age about 40 year, Astt. Teacher S/o Late Shri Dhani Rain Kallo, Janpad Primary Schoo! Uttainar Block Bhanupratappur, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) 2. Paras Kumar Usaindi Age about 42 years, Astt. Teacher S/o Shri Sanku Ram Usaindi Govt. 'Primary School Kuapani, Block Bhanupratappur, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) 3. Bhagiram Koshariya Age about 45 years, Astt. Teacher S/o Shri Sukalu Ram Koshariya, Gwvt. Primar^' School Bhardail Block - Bhanupratappur, Distt.Kanker(C.G.) 4. Praveen Pandey, Age about 43 years, Astt. Teacher S/o Shri R.K.Sharma Govt. Primary School Dewari (Balaji) BIock Nai-harpur, Distt. Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raiour Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissoiner, Public Instmction Directoral, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Distt. Education Officer, Kanker, Distt. Kanker(C.G.) 4. Shri K.P.Khare Upper Division Teacher, Middle School Govmdpur, Annpuma Para Distt. Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Sateh K. Aenlhotri, J. /ft Present: Shi-i Somkant Vemia, Advocate for the petitioners. Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer forthe State/respondents 1 to 3. RESPONDENTS i!ts\ . .^?. •? i 'jg. -X -o 3. (Passed on 29ln day of April, 2009) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instmctions, submits that the petitioners do not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage. However, he prays that fhe respondent-aufhorities may be directed to eonsider and decide his pending representations, as expeditiously as possible. Leamed counsel appearine for the State/respondents submits that in the event, the representations dated 28.07.2008, 01.11.2008 and 06.11.200t (Annexure P/7 colly.), are pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent authorites in accordance with law, on its own merit, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a periodofsixweeksfromthe dateofreceiptofacopyofthisorder. In view of the above, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives for adjudication. 4. Accordmgly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Anu^