IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1669 of 2006. APPLICATION NO. 1669 of 2006. APPLICATION NO. 1669 of 2006. WITH WITH WITH CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1670 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 1670 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 1670 OF 2005 IN IN IN SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO. 898 OF 2005. APPEAL NO. 898 OF 2005. APPEAL NO. 898 OF 2005. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Sandeep Marne for the Applicant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 29th October, 2007. : 29th October, 2007. : 29th October, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate for the Applicant. Office noting shows that the proposed legal representatives of the 2nd Respondent has been duly served with the private notice and an affidavit of service to that effect has been filed. Hence case is made out for condonation of delay and for setting aside the abatement. 2. Hence Civil Application No.1690 of 2006 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Civil Application Nos.1670 of 2006 is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within a period of six weeks. Judge. Judge. Judge.