IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-6187 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 18, 2011 Raj Kumar @ Raju ….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. H.P.S. Aulakh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is a petition seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 59, dated 23.03.2008, under Sections 148/149 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Sadar, Gohana, District Sonepat. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, makes statement that out of 24 prosecution witnesses, 21 have already been examined and Crl. Misc. No.M-6187 of 2011 now date fixed before the Trial Court is 25.04.2011, therefore, there is no inordinate delay in the trial. On the statement of Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition, at this stage with request to direct the learned Trial Court to expedite the trial since petitioner is in judicial custody for the last about three years. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage. However, learned Trial Court is requested to expedite the trial. Learned Trial Court is further requested not to grant unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. April 18, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2