Civil Revision No.1428 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1428 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.08.2010 Navdeep Singh Arora and another .....Petitioner Versus Manoj Kumar ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA Present:- Mr. G.C. Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Vinay Kashyap, Advocate, for the respondent. **** VINOD K.SHARMA, J. (ORAL) The petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to challenge the order dated 10.2.2010 passed by the learned trial Court, vide which the evidence of the petitioners was ordered to be closed by passing the following order: - “No PW is present. Adjournment sought. Perusal of the file shows that sufficient opportunities including last opportunity granted to the petitioner to conclude its evidence, however, he has failed to conclude the same. As such finding no justification in adjourning the case for the same purpose, the evidence of the petitioner is closed by court order. Now, the case is adjourned to 6.3.2010 for RWs.” Learned counsel for the petitioners does not contest the case on merits and prays that in the interest of justice, the petitioners be Civil Revision No.1428 of 2010 -2- granted one last opportunity to conclude their entire evidence, subject to payment of costs. In view of the stand taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court feels that it would be in the interest of justice if the petitioners are granted one last opportunity to conclude their entire evidence at their own risk and responsibility on the date to be fixed by the learned trial Court. “Ordered accordingly.” However, this shall be subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) as costs. Disposed off. (Vinod K. Sharma) Judge August 13, 2010 R.S.