HIGH 03URT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BBJikSPUR W.P.(S)No.684ofM05 Petitioner Smt fttofibai. t^fe <rf late Shri Bhaiyaram Patanwar, aged about 45 years, resident of village BUakula, Post - Khamaria, Tahsil and Distrtet Bllaspur (M.P.) (ncwG.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Madhya PrsKfesh (Now Chhattisgarh) throi^h: Secretaiy, Schoo! EducaBon Department, Vallabh Bhavan. Bhopal. 2. Deputy Director of EdwsSon, School EducaUon Deparbnent, Compoyte BuikKng, C^wstte Cottedorate, Bitaspur (MF^ 3. District Education Officer, School Education Departnient, Tahail and district- Bilaspur. 4. Shri T. D. Nawani, Btodc Educadon Offlcer, Btock-Pandarta, distrtea Bilaspur. APPLIGATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE ABMJNlSTRATft^TRIBUNALSACT. 1S85 SB: Hon'bis Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Shri Gautam Khe&apsf, Advoc^e for Ihe petffioner. Mss Deepali Pandey. Panel Lawyer for the respondents. ORDER (Passed on tNs 23"' day of April,2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the peWoner submUs ttiat the pefflioner has been denied the famBy penston and other payments of E.P.F., G.l.S. etc., vwthoutany reason, on ttieground that the deceased-emptt^ee has not menfioned her name as nominee. 2. Leamed counset appearing for the pefitioner, on hisfrucfions. submits that the petition»is ready to produce all the documents. which woukl go to ^tablish that she is fegally wedded wife of Late fiw 4 *- t<' j ! Shri Bhayaram Krtanwar. Leamed counsel (urther submNs that the peBb'ona-mayalsoobtainsuccessionGerttficatetothat^fect 3. The petifioner is granted liberty to produce all the doeuments wthin a period of Siree monttis (rom today. Thereirfter, ttie respondents/auflioriti^ may be dirwted to consider the case of the petitioner on the basis of the documente, produced by her and release retiral benefits, as stated above, wjthin a period of three vreeks, thersafter. 4. In view of the abovestated submission, made by teamed counsel for 8ie petftioner, this petition stands dlsposed of. No order as to coste. Thakur u