IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.935 of 2011 ENAMUL HAQUE, SON OF MD. SERAJUL HAQUE Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 23.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 23.08.2010 in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 99 of 2010 registered under Sections 304(B) and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no case under Section 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code is made out because there is not even a whisper regarding the demand of dowry. It is pointed out by him that the deceased was second wife of the petitioner and, as a matter of fact, she committed suicide. It is also pointed out by him that the deceased was immediately taken to Sadar Hospital where in course of her treatment, she died. To fortify his contention, he drew my attention towards Paragraph 21 of the case diary in which it has specifically been mentioned by the Investigating Officer that when he visited the place of occurrence, he found a broken killi. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the deceased was taken off the room after breaking the door and that is why broken killi was found on the place of occurrence. Although, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer but considering the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with above stated Koilwar P.S. Case No. 99 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)