IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No 162 of 1996 AND CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 211 OF 1996 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? No J 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? No 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? No 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? No -------------------------------------------------------------- CHANDRAKANT AMBALAL THAKKAR Versus KALIDAS HIRALAL PANCHAL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: In Cri.Revn.Application No. 162 of 1996 MR JR SHAH for Petitioner MR YS LAKHANI for Respondent No. 1 UNSERVED for Respondent No. 2 SERVED for Respondent No. 3 Mr K.P. Rawal, A.P.P. for Respondent No. 4 In Cri.Revn.Application No. 211 of 1996 Mr Y.S. Lakhani, for the petitioner. Mr K.P. Rawal, A.P.P. for the respondent No. 1 Mr J.R. Shah, advocate for the respondent No. 4 Served for respondent No. 3 Unserved for respondent No. 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE Date of decision: 29/08/96 ORAL JUDGEMENT With consent of the concerned advocates and APP Mr K.P. Rawal, the above referred two Criminal Revision Applications are taken up for final hearing. Parties to the said applications have resolved their disputes and have amicably settled the matter as per the consent terms dated 29th August, 1996. A copy of the said consent terms is placed on record in Criminal Revision Application No. 162 of 1996. In pursuance of the said terms, amount has been paid to the concerned persons. Parties to the litigations are present in the Court and they have been identified by the learned advocate Mr Y.S. Lakhani. 2. In view of the consent terms, the impugned order will have to be quashed and set aside so that the muddamal-truck bearing registration No. GJ-7T-9972 be handed over to Shri Chandrakant Ambalal Thakkar, petitioner in Criminal Revision Application No. 162 of 1996. 3. The Revision Applications are thus disposed of as allowed. It is directed that the Investigating Officer of Khanpur Police State, District Panch Mahals will hand over possession of the truck in question to Shri Chandrakant Ambalal Thakkar. 4. Rule is made absolute. ****** ssm./