IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2356 of 2008 ARJUN THAKUR . Versus THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BO . ----------- 02. 13.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.P. Jaisawal learned counsel for the respondent – Board. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing the writ application, the retiral dues of the petitioner have been paid, except gratuity. Learned counsel for the respondent – Board submits that the gratuity has also been paid as per Cheque No. 912972 dated 20.04.2009. In view of the statement made above, learned counsel for the petitioner is not pressing the writ application and the same is accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)