IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 29TH MAGHA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 125 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.27966/2009 Dated 06/10/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER --------------- K.K.,SREEDHARAN, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.KOCHUKOCHU,RETIRED ELECTRICITY WORKER,K.S.E.B, GENERATION DIVISION, KALLARKUTTY,IDUKKI DISTRICT (RESIDING AT KANJIRAMKUNNEL,MILLUMPADY, AMBALAPADY.P.O, IDUKKI-686 562). BY ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.MATHEW SUNNY RESPONDENT(S): 2ND RESPONDENT ----------------------------- MR.JOHNSON C.PETER KALLADA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,(FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER),PRESENTLY WORKING AS THE CHIEF ENGINEER(H.R.M),KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,VYDYUTHI BHAVAN,PATTOM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI. ASOK M.CHERIYAN, STANDING COUNSEL, KSEB THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- Cont. Case (C) NO. 125 OF 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT This Court, as per judgment dated 6.10.2009 in W.P.(C) No. 27966 of 2009, had directed the second respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 representation therein within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. This Contempt Case is filed alleging that the direction contained in the said judgment has not been complied with. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for the Kerala State Electricity Board has made available a copy of the communication No. Estt.GI-II/WP (C) No.27966/09 dated 7.1.2010, which would reveal that an order has been passed in compliance with the direction contained in the judgment dated 6.10.2009 in W.P.(C) No.27966 of 2009. In the light of the above communication, the Contempt Case is Cont. Case (C) 125/2010 2 closed. However, the petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the order dated 7.1.2010, if so advised. (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) sp/ Cont. Case (C) 125/2010 3 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. Cont. Case (C) NO. 125/2010 JUDGMENT 18th February, 2010