IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5708 of 2007 Date of decision:28.01.2009. Kirandeep Singh ...Petitioner Versus Dayawati @ Dayawanti ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. A.S.Syan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. G.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner informs that as per his instructions, the petitioner was forcibly dispossessed from Shop No.15-A during the pendency of this revision petition and inspite of the stay order granted by this Court on 13.11.2007. In the light thereof, the plea for interim restraint order is rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the respondent disputes the contention on the above facts. The parties are relegated to the learned Trial Court which shall record a finding of fact about whether the petitioner came to be forcibly dispossessed during the pendency of the present revision petition or not. The exercise shall be concluded within one month with effect from the date on which date the matter shall be listed before the learned Trial Court. If the learned Trial Court finds that the petitioner had actually been forcibly dispossessed, an order on the point of restoration shall obviously follow. Both the parties through their learned counsel are directed to appear before the learned Trial Court on 11.02.2009. January 28, 2009 (S.D.Anand) vinod Judge