IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32841 of 2010 SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV SON OF RAMADHAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 22.12.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence u/ss.364, 379/34, 302, 201 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. By an order dated 15.3.2010 vide Cr.Misc.No.3211 of 2010 the petitioner was refused bail but with a direction to the trial court to expedite the trial. The report of the trial court reveals that despite effective steps no witness is turning up to depose while the petitioner is languishing in jail since 6.10.2008 and the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is in custody since 6.10.2008, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional District and Sessions Judge 14, Patna in Sessions Trial No.2614 of 2008, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be Ram Babu Yadav, the uncle of the petitioner and the other bailor shall be local since the petitioner belongs to Saran district. The bailor will undertake 2 to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )