IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.15879 OF 2001 Between: L. Ramulu. - - - Petitioner. AND 1. The Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar, Rep. by its Presiding Officer. 2. Senior Manager (Works) A.P.S.R.T.C. Regional Work Shop, Karimnagar District. - - - Respondents. The Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.15879 OF 2001 JUDGMENT: The Petitioner, who alleges that he worked as Khalasi from 24-05-1987, the appointment however is claimed to be only oral and so also the alleged termination dated 15-04-1990, the petitioner therefore approached to the Industrial Tribunal, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar, by I.D. No.22 of 1994 claiming that since he has worked for 240 days continuously, he is entitled for regularization. In view of the specific stand of the petitioner that the appointment as well as the termination is oral, the petitioner laid evidence of himself and another co-worker and also contended that similarly situated other employees have been regularized and the petitioner alone is left out. The Industrial Tribunal examined the matter and after considering the evidence on behalf of the 2nd respondents management, MW.1, on the basis of the record, the Tribunal came to the conclusion that there is no record of the petitioner having worked as casual labourer and in any case, there is no record of the petitioner having worked continuously for 240 days. The oral evidence being not sufficient, the Industrial Tribunal dismissed the petitioner’s case. The said Award dated 03-07-1997 is questioned in this Writ Petitioner in the year 2001. Apart from the deficiencies noticed in impugned award, I do not find any material, even now, on the part of the petitioner, to substantiate that the petitioner worked continuously for 240 days to claim entitlement for the service regularization etc., The award of the Tribunal which is based on the evidence produced before it is not shown to suffer from any perversity of reasoning and under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, factual questions cannot be enquired into. Impugned award therefore does not warrant any interference. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J. Dt.09-12-2010. DSH