IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SUNDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 11413 of 2009 Between: M/s. Great India Mining (P) Ltd. represented by G.Deepak Reddy 8-2-703/6/A or 63, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-34. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Mines, Industries and Commerce Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Mines and Geology, BRKR Building, 8th floor, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 3 The Deputy Director of Mines and Geology, Kalyan nagar, Uppal, Hyderabad. 4 The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Nallakunta, Hyderabad- 44. 5 The Secretary, Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board, Paryavaran Bhawan, A-III, Industrial Estate, Sanath Nagar, Hyderabad. 6 The Deputy Chief Controller of Explosives, Department of Explosives, Kendriya Sadan, 1st Floor, Sultan Bazar, Koti, Hyderabad. 7 The Controller of Explosives, Department of Explosives, Chennai. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in demanding the Petitioner to pay the Dead Rent and Security deposit in vide Lr.No.2750/S/2007, dated 31.3.2009 for a Lease granted for Stone and Metal in over extent of Ac.30.0 in Sy.No.146, Yacharam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District for a period of 10 years, before getting the clearances from all the Government Departments concerned, as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and contrary to the Mines and Mineral Act, 1957 and AP Minor Mineral Concession Rules and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.DONTULARAVINDER Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY The Court made the following : O R D E R:- The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded, and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J 12th June, 2009 bcj