IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.427 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision:27.01.2009 Sarabjit Kaur .............. Petitioner Vs. Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal and another .............Respondents Present: Ms. Anita Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? -.- K.KANNAN, J. (ORAL) 1. The petition filed for seeking DNA test of the plaintiff and the two daughters of the defendant was dismissed by the Court below and the applicant before the trial Court is revision petitioner before this Court. 2. The suit had been filed for recovery of possession of the property by the plaintiff from the hands of the defendant where the defendant has raised the contention that she had been kept as mistress of the plaintiff and the house itself had been purchased, by way of gift, for her benefit and for the benefit of children that were born through the plaintiff. The proof of birth of the children that may have been born to the defendant is alien to the scope of suit that is filed for recovery of possession on the basis of title. The evidence which the defendant was trying to secure would also be equally irrelevant for the issue relating to title to immoveable property or entitlement of the plaintiff to secure possession. The dismissal accords with what is legally appropriate and calls for no intervention in revision petition. 3. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 27, 2009 Pankaj*