IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49787 of 2008 FIROZ MIAN @ S.M.FIROZ ALAM, S/o Sayed Ali Abu Nasar Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 04.03.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that it is a love affair in between Arif and the informant’s daughter either she eloped or kidnapped by Arif earlier also. In the earlier case, petitioner was a pairvikar of Arif, which has been made reason for involving him with false allegation, it is clear from the further statement of the informant recorded by the I.O. In the present case also, he did not succeed to have sexual intercourse with the victim and he remained in custody since 29.07.2008. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Sanjay Kumar Jha, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Begusarai in connection with Barauni P.S. Case no. 64 of 2005. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)