IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6068 of 2011 RAVINDRA PASWAN, S/O SRI SATYANARAYAN PASWAN, R/O LAHLADPUR CHOWKI, P.S.-RANITALAB (KANPA), DISTT.-PATNA. …………….Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……….Opposite Party ----------- 02 21.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for quashing the order dated 20th February, 2010, passed in Ranitalab P.S. Case No. 115 of 2009 taking cognizance for the offences under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that as a matter of fact during investigation that no cogent material has been collected against the petitioner warranting taking of the cognizance. It is further submitted that on perusal of the order passed in Criminal Revision No. 52 of 2010, it would appear that the seized article was released in favour of the person from whose possession the articles were released. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on the other hand submits that these matters which have been raised in this 2 application would invite consideration in the court below. Considering the rival submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for quashing the order dated 20th February, 2010. However, it will be open for the petitioner to agitate all his grievances available to him in law before the court below at the appropriate stage. The application stands disposed off. Safik (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)