^--^i— "> B1GPO®THB CHHATnSSARH STAT1SI a&IPUR (CHIIATTISG^^ ^ SJ^r- ^-QkfirL | <^A/^-! ^ ?<^^1 ./ a r-£-^^^"f HA/PUR^ O. A. S?0. y2-oo2 i>0^/'^)Li \'1 ',!•'-• AppLICANT Sbivaaray^i patie S/o Sfaivdayal patl® Peoa^ offxce of tfae ®x@eufcive1toLgixie©r, Public ^orfcs Bepart(B@it, S®T(JNIBMAN MANDJa/, Biiaspur (C^G^) permaaent Resideat of Vill. Bbarkoai, P.G,NARBA.DA, Tafasxl aad Bistrxct Raipar (C.G.) V B R S U. & RESPQNB1B2TTSs 1 • Tfae Sabate'^T: Qfaba1;tisgarfa,^^?®*azT pablic torks Departm^ifc, Govt^ of Cbhattis^rh^ Saebivaiaya, Raipur (Clafaattisgarh) 2^ Tiie Saperxat idiHg ^agineer, public ^orks Dqpartm^ii^ S@tu NiriBaa M^ndai^ laxpur (Otihattisgarb) 3. Ttie ®xeoativ© ISagxaeery Putolic ifoxtes Depar-fcmenfc, Setu Nirmaa Maad^i Biiaspur (Cfabattis^.rb) !4.'- ,'~t:- i -3- 4EPLXCATI,QN U/S 19 QP TH^ STATS AEMINISTSATIV®T18XBm_^ ACT. 1985, ir' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.4599 OF 2005 Petitioner Shivnarayan Patle versus Respondents The State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : None appears for the parties. ^ ORDER (Passed on 7ul ofSeptember, 2006) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions- iione appears nor any representation is made on behalfof the petitioner. S.P.C. was issued. None was present earlier also. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sadsh K. Agnihotri Judge Gopal