IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION No: 10587 of 2009 Between: 1 Syed Yadullah S/o. Syed Asadullah R/o. H.No.1-6-806, Pathan Basti, Mushirabad, Hyderabad. 2 Syed Banu, W/o. Syed Yadullah R/o. H.No.1-6-806, Pathan Basti, Mushirabad, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Special Officer Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Circle No.9, MCH Parking Complex, Abids, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner of Police, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. (Andhra Pradesh) 4 The Station House Officer, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. (Andhra Pradesh) 5 Mohd. Wajid S/o. Not known R/o. M.No.1-6-175/1, Naseem Gulshan, Patan Basthi Diara, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction and more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that inaction of respondents 1 to 4 by not initiating an enquiry and taking action against Respondent No.5 as illegal, against law and by issuing directions to Respondent 1 to 5 to consider the representation dated 7.5.2009 by initiating action against the respondent No.5 as per law in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.R.A.ACHUTHANAND Counsel for the Respondent No.: R.RAMACHANDRA REDDY,SC FOR MCH 1,2,4&6 The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION No: 10587 of 2009 ORDER: Heard Sri R.A.Achuthanand, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 & 2, and the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent nos.3 & 4, and at their request the writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. This writ petition is filed questioning the inaction on the part of respondents 1 to 4 in initiating an enquiry on the representation dated 07.05.2009 submitted by them complaining about the illegal occupation of public street by respondent no.5 and in taking action against him. Having regard to the nature of the complaint expressed by the petitioners, there is no need to go into the merits of the case and it is suffice if the respondent nos.1 to 4 are directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 07.05.2009 submitted by the petitioners and take action in accordance with law. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent nos.1 to 4 to consider and dispose of the representation dated 07.05.2009 submitted by the petitioners and take action in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. -------------- 28.05.2009 CVRK