ifa Bnnd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURB AT BILASPUR(C.G.» WRIT PETITION N0. l C?i:> fc/2Q05 PETITIONERS ..-•""rf\ < P&--P; ^ y n'pa-^^'?' ^I.0.w^6'""' T? W c" RAJ KUMAR SIDAR, S/0. LATE SHRI GHASIA RAM SIDAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, CONSTABLE N0. 515, PRESENTLY POSTED AT P.S. BHANSI, DISTRICT SOUTH BASTAR DANTEWADA (C.G.) c/ SHIRAD RAM PAIKRA, S/0. SHRI SADHU RAM PAIKRA, AGED .ABOUT 34 YEARS, CONSTABLE •NO. 08, PRESENTLY POSTED AT R.S. BHANSI, DISTRICT DANTEWADA SOUTH BASTAR (C.G) KAUSHAL PRASAD PAIKRA, S/0. SHRI LAKHAN LAL PAIKRA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, CONSTABLE N0. 112, PRESENTLY POSTED AS P.S. BHANSI, DISTRICT SOUTH BASTAR DANTEWADA (C.G.) VIJAY KUMAR TIWARI, S/0. BANSHI LAL TIWARI, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, CONSTABLE N0. 642, PRESENTLY POSTED AT P.S. KUAKONDA, DISTRICT DANTEWADA (C.G.j GAMBHIR RAM JURRI, S/0. LATE SHRI MANRAKHAN RAM JURRI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, HEAD CONSTABLE N0. 292, PRESENTLY POOTED AT P.S. JAGARGUNDA, DISTRICT SOUTH BASTAR DANTEWADA (C.G.) DIKENDRATIWARI, S/0. KHORBAHRA PRASAD TWARI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, CONSTABLE N0. 522, PRESENTLY POSTED AT P.S. JAGARGUNDA, DANTEWADA, DISTRICT DANTEWADA (C.G.) RBSPONDENTS VERSUS 1. THE STATE OP CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPAKTMENT OF HOME, MANTRAIAYA, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH). iK.I.I 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HQ., RAIPUR (CHHATnSGARH) 3. THE ASSISTANT INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMINISTRATION), POLICE HQ., RAIPUR (CHHATTISGARH). 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT DANTEWADA, (CHHATnSGARH.) WRIT PEnTION UNDER ARTICLB 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE HATURE OP MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI. PROinBITIOll AHD FOR OTHER SUITABLE WlittT OR WRITS, ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRK;TION OR DIRECTIONS, The petitioners, above named, most humbly and respectfully —suhinitsas under :- XI-HC-22 iil!i' 3^ •<ii<<iti'i), s'Tflu'is, Ricii'Hy Sfl^l^iach , \jo f ^ <n? fc/ o^ *li*ini sn*iicn ••••••••••••••••••••• g^ 200 fd^ •"••••• .STI^T^iT .^..-,^..^.,.^,^,^ ^ailii'fi'^f .:.<»i. «? •^ ^\.v»)^^' , iil:A|l(]4utt»uu.| ,'!'ft 24.6.2005 Snit. Reenia Dubey, CQUI^ Shri G. K. Beriwal, Dep| State. Heard. t Learaed counsel for\t|he petitioner submAts that identical orders have been p^ after traasfer order.no relievias ia W.P.No. 4709/2004 (Krishi] others) vide order dated 1^.1.2005 has flirected the respondents to l^lieve the petitipner within 15 days froin the date pf the production of fhe co|py of the order. In view of the foregoiag, to coinply wifh the transfer ijirder by issuing appropi-iate order for relieviag fhe petitioni^r wifhin a period of 15 days iroin the date bfreceipt ofcopy|ofthis order, the petition stands disposed With fhe above directionj of finaUy. 'til'ilFrl'ifl'-f 1 iiinT ff tetzl <Ri«iT ^3|1^tTST[^T sel for the petitioner. q^ uty Advocate General for the .ssed in several cases where order was passed. This Court a Muiari Mishra Vs. State & fhe respondents are directed Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge