IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 347 of 2011 Prem Dutt, Head Constable No. 460 ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Maninder Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the State. RANJIT SINGH J. The petitioner had initially approached this Court not mainly against the order of his transfer but with the grievance that he was not being promoted. Notice was issued and reply has been filed. The reason for not granting promotion, apparently, is that the range of the petitioner has now been changed on bifurcation of earlier range Gurgaon. In order to succeed, the petitioner would have to challenge the said order whereby his range is changed, in case, it is not permissible under law or otherwise on any other ground. It appears that this aspect of the issue is not under challenge in the writ petition. Counsel seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition to file a fresh one to raise wholesome challenge. Dismissed as withdraw as prayed for. September 09, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE