-L ^' BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.1 W.P.No. f3 B 3S OF 2004 Petitioner : Mahendra Kumar Sahu, S/o. Late Shri Roopcharan Sahu, aged about 41 years, Assistanf teacher—^Govt. Middle School, ^'~ Temri, (Nawagarh) .? Resident of Village Chicholi, Post Office- Temri, Police , Station House, Nandghat, Tah. Nawagarh, Distt. Durg (C.G.). ..***' ^sy^ ^••^"T^^C,...^""' ^••••^c^z^'-""r ^s^"^ <6^*" 1 e^-"~ A- Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Principal Secretary, School Education, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Distt. Education Officer, Bemetara (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTIUTION OF INDIA w XI-HC—78 t(W<*IT »*ll<b 3^ "'41<<l<n<<, ®fll'M'l<o,fqMI'U^t (^f ZS-T^ • Ttcl?'"""""""""" """"""""•""'""""^200 3n^T'(RW (•jq(^<l<tt[) SfS^I 'ERT !t;Hi+ '^! STi^T ytvw^ s^--^ liLX TOITOT'Hftn OT^I 25-11-2004 tltie Shri Ashok Venna, counse.| Shri V.Y.S.-Murttiy, Dy. Shrivastava, Govt. Advocate for AppUcation for urgent hearjng Heard; Learaed counsel for-fhe, relates to traasfer of ttie petitio|ner. petitioner has been traasferred Teiari, Nawagarh to Goverainent| vide order dated 31-7-2004 (Ajtmea aaiae shown atS.No. 13 in the subniits that out of 2 10 studenl Goveniin.ent Middle Scliool, Texn|ri petitioner. He also submits thal be givea an. oppQrtunity of fi1in; fhe com.petent aiithority of ti|ie considered on its own nierits in a| Having considered aud wif]iout nierits offhe case, ia fhe opiiuou|pf served if a direction is given to| representation raising his grieva4ces of the respondents aloug wifh a withia 15 days, aud on suc] coiapetent aufhority offtie for ffi.e petitioner. fYdvocate General with Shri Viaod State. jng is allowed. xnlr '+l^^rat7! *fi*4^iTT? f6l<l <^i^iT ^SlfOT 311^1 l)etitioner silbinits that flie niatter He further subniits that the froia Govenumenlj Middle School, Prixuary School, Tendubhata, Saja ^jtLD.exuTe-P/1) aad the petitioner's laforesaid trausfer order. He also t^ only two teachers are working ia. i|ri, Nawagarh including fhe present for ftie present the petitioner inay the detailed representation before respondents, which shall be ;cordaace with law. expressing any opiaion on the titus Court, ends ofjustice will be the peti.tion.er to Eaake a detailed before fhe coiupetent authority ;opy offh.e petition aud fhis order, ^i represeatation being filed, the shaU. decide the sauie on its respo^ldents ^•s^r'. --t- »11*IC(T9W(^ 3';er:"4i<<i<t<i, OTil'H'is, fqiti^y ..^L..2S.^i•^1.200 Sil^T'T^^ ( yii^'Ki'?) SII^T^ilR-li* ^<ff 3T^T ff>ii^ Gowri owmuciity ui—feiccoraaiiGC withia tavo nionfh.s frora fhe date ( Leanied counsel for fhe pe has not been reUeved. He prays contuiue. It is directed that if the pe ofher person has not joined in p3 inav be aUowed to contiaue tiU inade cleai' that if the petitioner person has already joiued ia .pla not en.title fhe petitioner to rejoin ; Wifh tlie aforesaid observal o£ . ', . . : ' • . Conseqiienfly M.W.P.No.422 tttat '*l'I|[l'f<il'1 W^< ^ fe<3t ^fsR^R ^Taifgnan^i LW as eatiy us pQ^Slble prefeiubly >f receipt of fhe representation. itioner subnuts th.at the petidoner the petitioner m.ay be aUowed to Slllll^ "®i::^^^ Ititioner has not been relieved and ^ce of fhe petitioner, the petitioner fjie representation. is decided. It is th.as ah-eady been relieved or ofher ;e of the petitioner, fhis order wiU ^.t the earlier place ofposting. jions, fhis petition stands disuosed 1^4/2004 also stands disp6sed of. -l^— Sd/- | ActingChiefJustice J^ -. .-L^-:C. :^<\ Gt-J>RJ—FS/7e—5/200(-50,000.