IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15649 of 2008 MAKHAN SAHNI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 9.5.2008 Heard. This is a second attempt by filing anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner. His earlier anticipatory bail petition was disposed of on 1.2.2007 vide Cr.Misc. No.1016 of 2007. Learned counsel submits that petitioner no.1 is the father-in – law and petitioner no.2 is minor brother of the husband of the deceased. Learned counsel submits that since then the trial proceeded against the accused persons who appeared and were acquitted of the charge under section 304B/34 of the I.P.C. In my view the petitioner ought to have surrendered and faced trial alongwith the accused persons. This Court as such is not inclined to interfere with the earlier order not granting anticipatory bail of the petitioner. In the circumstances the petitioners, Makhan Sahni and Shankar Sahni, should surernder before the court below within four weeks from today and pray for regular bail which shall be considered on its own merit preferably on the same day without being prejudiced by this order. Anil Kr. Sinha (S. P. Singh, J.)