S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3277/2006 Date : 01.08.2006 HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. M.K. Garg for the applicant. Mr. V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. The only contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that case under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act has wrongly been lodged against the applicant as the applicant is having licence to sale the drug. According to learned counsel, while he was going on motorcycle having Dizapam tablets etc were found in his possession. He has placed on record licence of the applicant. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. I have considered the submissions made before me and perused the material available on record. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant Madan Lal son of Arjun Das shall be released on bail in FIR No.179/2006 P.S. Lalgarh, District Sri Ganganagar, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vijayant