^- ^r E3~sr INTHE HIGH COURT OP CHMAmSGAftH BILASPUR WRIT PETTnON fServIcel N0. 3 3 f 3 pp 2 PETXTXONER ; ^4^' .^x^?^/ ^'..--a^:.'-"' >'>•' -^' ^".^ i><i-v'^ .oc'"'. '^'a''.^-' i?"- RESPONDENTS : Dhanna Singh Gautam, S/0 Late Shri Ajab Singh Gautam, aged about 55 years, Occupation- Service, Posted as- Peon at Government Middle Schoot, Devarbeej, Vikas Khand Berla District- Durg, (C.G.). VERSUS (J.) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) (2) Collector, Durg, District- Durg, (C.G.) (3) District Education Officer, Bennetara, District- Durg, (C.G.) (4) District Education Officer, Durg, District- Dur&, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSmTUTION OF INDIA. €^ y vtv w ^ns: ?m ss^i g^ 'TE^ •<11*IIM*1, »ti1'M'IS, fs«'1l<-iy,< ^....LJi,.£:.to.^......^).^. SB : HOWBLE SHRI JUSTICiE PRITINKER DIWAKBR qirafepfi^ 'wrcti'? fsIA <fa'yi< ^ 29.07.a009 Sbri Awadh Tripafhi, c^iuisel for the petition.er. SUri Y^hwant Singh Tjhakur, Dy. A.G. for tte State. Challenge in the pres^nt petition is to fhe order dated 30.6.2009 (Aitnexure P/1) p^ssed by respondent No.3 by which fhe petitioner who is workjng aa Peon ia thc Govt. Higher Sccondaiy Schoo], Devarbeej^, Block Berla has been transferred at fhe option to the OfiBce of pistrict Education Officer Dui^. Contention of counse seitiorily of CIass FV enip] department is being niain woidd be adverselv affected. 1 for fhe pctitioner is that fhe oyees ia fhe Distnct Education toiaed dlstrict wise and if the petitioner is compeUed to pr(x;eed on bis transfer, his seiuorily Hc furfher submits fhat Bemetara Education dtetrict and Dui^; pducation district are different and therefore the petitioner cou|d not have been traasferred froin one district to anofher distn<}t. He also subiuits fhat no OD.C has petitioner and the petitioner has been posted in place of fhe^ already made a representatio| Contention of couns^l petitioner m.ake a fhe saiae wouM be decided itl represenqitio a vide Annescure P/3. for fhc State is fhat let the tion to fhe respondent No. 3 aad accordance with law. Rh XI-HG—78 TSE[ "4|<4|d'4, »n1^iis, [s«'fl-Lllf< .....A^.:fc.C;S7...%fl1.^......^ s^iflW( ^lfel 3"^I petpii Counsel for fhe representation. However he sul| is decided, the petitioner may Accordiagty, the petition ^ the petitioner to niake a reprei days froni fhe date ofreceipt woiild be decided by the of fhree weeks fsosa. thc dafl iinpugned order shalt not be g] would be aUowed to perform. postmg oflthe aufhokities hte VPS^FVR 'qTCi^ff'? fS^t <Fi|fc;l< ^sifgiian^r ^tioner ^rees to makc a |inits fhat tiU Iiis representation ^ given some protective ordcr. |s disposed ofwitfa a direction to tentetion wifhin a pcriod of ten copy of this order, fhe same coucenued within a period ^ of its receipt. Tffl &en fhe Fven effect to and the petitioner duties iu fhe present place of Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge