[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4507 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4507 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4507 OF 2006 M/s Carona Ltd. ..Applicant V/s State of Maharashtra And anr. ..Respondents. Mr. A. H. Ponda, Senior Advocate for Mr. P. P. Pathani, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.D.P. Adsule, A.P.P. for the State. Mrs. Rohini A. Wagh for respondent No.2. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 22ND JANUARY, 2007. DATE : 22ND JANUARY, 2007. DATE : 22ND JANUARY, 2007. P.C. . Heard Mr. A.H. Ponda, learned Senior Counsel for the applicant and Mrs. Rohini Wagh, learned Counsel for respondent No.2. After arguments at some length, the learned Counsel for both the parties concedes that the procedure suggested by the leaned Special Metropolitan Magistrate in the order dated 8/12/2006 on the application dated 4/12/2006, filed in Criminal Case No. 4420/S/02 is most appropriate and it will curtail the examination and cross-examination, as well as save [2] lot of time, not only of the parties but also of Court and therefore, in all 95 matters, which are pending in the Court, same procedure may be adopted. With consent, this application may be disposed off. 2. In view of the above, the application stands disposed off. The learned Magistrate is hereby directed to follow the procedure prescribed by him in his order dated 8th December, 2006, on the application dated 4th December, 2006, in all 95 matters with further, direction that hearing in these matters shall be taken up day today and no adjournment may be granted on the request of the accused, unless in view of any particular circumstance, it is absolutely necessary. The accused shall be allowed to led the defence evidence in the said matter in spite of the order passed on 15/1/2007. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) [3]