IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10744 of 2009 PANCHU SAH @ PANCHU SAO Son of Ram Dev Sah, Resident of village-Gangmaniyari, P.S. Sakra, District Muzaffarpur Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 18.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under Sections 304 B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is the husband. It is stated that the trial has commenced in this case and five witnesses have already been examined. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that witnesses examined in the trial, have not supported the prosecution version. However, since the trial has already commenced and a number of witnesses have been examined, this Court is not inclined to allow this petition and order for grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Let the trial be expedited and the trial court shall make all endeavours to complete the trial within three months. In case, for no fault of the defence the trial is lingered on account of non-production of witnesses by the prosecution, petitioner will be at liberty to make a prayer for bail before 2 the learned Court below. This application is disposed of thus. Bibhash (J.N. Singh, J.)