IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16181 of 2011 Siya Ram Mahto Versus Ramanand Mahto ----------- 02. 22.09.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned Court below by the impugned order dated 23.05.2011 passed in title suit no.255 of 1986 refused to recall the order dated 02.11.2010 at the instance of the petitioner. It appears that on 02.11.2010, the amendment application filed by the plaintiff-respondent was dismissed as not pressed. This petitioner filed the application and insisted the Court that the said order be recalled and the amendment application be disposed of after hearing the parties. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below assigned the reasons for not allowing the application filed by the petitioner. Therefore, I find no reason to interfere with the impugned order in supervisory jurisdiction. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. Saurabh ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)