Chandka :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.516 OF 2007 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.516 OF 2007 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.516 OF 2007 Shekhar Babaji Nalawde ..Applicant versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondents Ms. S. A. Mudbidri for the Applicant. Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for the Respondents - State. CORAM : V. C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V. C. DAGA, J. CORAM : V. C. DAGA, J. DATE : 11TH OCTOBER, 2007 DATE : 11TH OCTOBER, 2007 DATE : 11TH OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the Respondents - State. 2. This Revision is directed against the Order dated 14.8.2007 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg at Oros in Sessions Case No. 5 of 2004, whereby the application seeking pardon came to be rejected after recording the finding of fact that the pardoning is not genuine and the same is submitted with an ulterior motive. Apart from this, it is clear from the Order that this application has Chandka :2: been moved when half of the evidence in the trial has already been recorded by the trial court. 3. Under these circumstances, no case is made out to interfere with the order impugned herein. There is no perversity in the order of the trial court. The view taken by the trial court is proper, no interference is called for. In the result, the application is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE