5 u- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH CGURT OF WHATTLSGAK^ AT BILASPUR_(C.6.) W.P. fS) N0. rl>r3>'5~^~ /2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^.^vsy ,..-",^ .^y.^ ^y..--"" ^ »• '/ Ramchandra Sewaiya, Aged about 53 years, S/o Shri Shyamratan Sew/anya, Lecturer, Minimata High School Karesara, Block Saja , Distt. Durg (C.S.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department &.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 2. The Director Public Instructions Raipur (C.G.) District Education officer Durg, Distt. Durg (C.6.) 4. Joint Director, Treasury, accounts, pension, Raipur (C.6.) ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^ '7=T -^ww^, 'an\ww, (^rtiyy ^......'A?..£&2...u£.:..s.?';£li^ 3iI^T'q?W(' an^l'?;! W '^8TT Sn^T'gTRN? ./• wnw ^rffg aii^i sB^: Hon'bie Shri Manindra Iv'iohan SMrivastava. J 29-08-2011 ortier ame Shri KS.Pawar, counseiTorthepeil Shri Sus'nii Dubey, Government Heard on admission. Learned counsei appeanng Tor tr] entitled to grant or regular pay scaie trorp circulare dated 13/01/2009 ana' 5/01/201 the State Government and in view of Administrath/e Tribunat, Jabaipur in OJ others v. State ofM.F. & olhers), whicti the same, was dismissed by the Supr^i petitioner submits that the respondents petitioner. On the other hand, iearned counf petitioner olaims benetit or Ureuiars dati ought to hs.ve first approached the Taking into consideration the into consideration that orders have been granted iiberty to approach respondent a'ated 13/01/09and &'1/2011. itthe petitioner stands on the iViadhukant Yadu (Supra) and subseqi)i Speciai Leave Petition (Civii) N'o.6892/^; relier. vVShthe aforesaid obsen/ations, We 4i^l^T^l "^FRTf ^f 1^3t 'lpjf^.t't. ^73iRPT3II^r Itioner. Adt/ocate fort'ne State on advanoe copy. {e petitioner submits that the petitioner is the initiai date of appointment in view of (colieotively as Annexure P/2), issued by passsd by the Madhya Pradesh State .^.No.2745/89 {Madhukant 'radu and 56 iater on attained finality, as S.L.P. against Court aiso. Learned counsel for the be direcfed to consider tne case of the responttents subrnissions rtay iei for the respondents submits that if the ^d 13/01/2009 and 5/1/2011, the petitioner sponpents, claiming such benefit. made by the parties and atso taking passed in number or cases, tne petitioner is a4horities, claiming benefit based on circulars sam^ Tootings as per order passed by tne SAT in |ently confirmed by the Suprerne Court in P, the petitioner may be entitled to same e petition stands finally disposed ofr. Sd/- ' ManindraMohanShrivastava^ Judge