IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8266 of 2009 SUSHIL KUMAR @ SUSHIL SAH son of Moti Sah, @ Moti Lal Sah, resident of village-Barhari, P.S.-Kargahar (Barhari), Dist.-Rohtas at Sasaram. Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.10947 of 2009 PRADIP SAH son of Semji Sah, resident of village- Barhari, P.S.-Kargahar, Dist.-Rohtas at Sasaram Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.16489 of 2009 AJAY SAH son of late Lakhan Sah, resident of village- Badahari, P.S.-Kargahar, Dist.-Rohtas at Sasaram Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 23.7.2009 All the above three applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order because they have arisen out of one occurrence. The petitioners are accused of a case which has been registered for the offence under sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code on 13.12.2006. Subsequently after a week section 412 of the Indian Penal Code has been added. Allegation is of looting of sugar from the truck. Submission is that the petitioners are not named in the first information report and have not been put on T.I.Parade in spite of the fact that they are in custody since January 2009. They have no direct complicity. Their names have come on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. The petitioners are allegedly purchased the looted sugar. The petitioners have denied that they have purchased sugar knowing that it was looted article. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the - 2 - above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned court, Rohtas at Sasarm in connection with Sheosagar P.S.Case No.181 of 2008. Md.S. (Shyam Kishore Sharma,J.)