IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-30902 of 2009 Date of Decision: February 10, 2010 Kala Masih & Others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. A.S. Manaise, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent No.1. Mr. Harjot S. Mann, Advocate, for respondent No.2. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) It transpires that appeal against conviction is pending adjudication. Vide Order dated 9.12.2009, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurdaspur was asked to record the statements of the parties in regard to the compromise. Report dated 15.12.2009 has been received from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, alongwith statements of the parties recorded by Crl. Misc. No. M-30902 of 2009 [2] that Court. As per the report, the parties have stated that they have effected a compromise. Let report of Chief Judicial Magistrate and the statements be forwarded to the appellate Court viz. the Court of Sessions, Gurdaspur, dealing with Criminal Appeal No.60 of 2.9.2008 `State vs. Kala Masih & Others’, to enable the appellate Court to take into account the factum of compromise and take decision accordingly. The petition is accordingly disposed of. (AJAI LAMBA) February 10, 2010 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?