IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35557 of 2008 SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL PRASAD, S/O BHARAT PRASAD, R/O VILLAGE- CHHITAULI TOLA CHAKLAPAR, P.S. GOREYAKOTHI, DISTRICT- SIWAN. -PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. – OPP.PARTY 2 18.11.2008 The first information report informed the Police that an unknown person hired the Bolero car from the son of the informant and neither the vehicle returned nor his son returned. It was suspected that the son of the informant has been killed with a view to steal the vehicle. The name of the petitioner has featured in course of investigation. The son of the informant has died. The vehicle has also been retreated. Although the name of the petitioner has featured from the statements allegedly given by a person arrested in connection with the crime, it would not be appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner in as much as the investigation is at its initial stage. The observations, as above, shall not be taken into account if in future petitioner applies for grant of regular bail. (Barin Ghosh, J.) AAhmad