In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-24032 of 2008 (O&M) Pritam Kaur and others ..... Petitioners vs State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Abhishek Chautala, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Rajesh Bindal J. The petitioners are seeking restrain against the private respondents for not harassing them by calling at the police station. Petitioner no. 1 is the mother of respondent no. 7 on whose complaint the petitioners were being summoned. It was stated that civil litigation between the parties was already pending and RSA No. 3659 of 2007 filed by petitioner no. 1 was admitted on 5.11.2007 and stay of execution of the impugned decree has been granted. Inspite of that still on the complaint filed by respondent no. 7 who is respondent in the aforesaid regular second appeal, the petitioners were called in the police station and were being harassed. In the reply filed by the official respondents, it is admitted that enquiry into the complaint filed by respondent no. 7 was made and ultimately finding that the dispute between the parties is civil in nature for which the litigation is already pending, the complaint was filed. Considering the aforesaid facts, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as such. 13.7.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge