IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. L.P.A. No.706 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.5.2011 Shakti Chawla & others. -----Appellants. Vs. The Hindu Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd. & others. -----Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. D.V. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harit Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1. --- 1. Whether the reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest or not? ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, ACJ 1. This appeal has been preferred against order of learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition of the appellants to quash the sale process resorted to by the respondent-Bank for recovering its dues. L.P.A. No.706 of 2010 2. According to the appellants, the property which has been sold belongs to them and is not subject to any charge of the Bank. 3. Learned Single Judge observed that the matter was already subject matter of suit and the issues raised in the writ petition could be gone into therein. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. In view of the fact that the title dispute about the property in dispute is pending adjudication before the Civil Court, learned Single Judge was justified in relegating the appellants to the said remedy. 6. We, thus, do not find any ground to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE May 27, 2011 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) ashwani JUDGE 2