IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.F.A. No. 1998 of 2010 (O&M) Bhim Singh and others .... Appellants vs. State of Haryana and others .... Respondents Coram : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL, J The landowners have filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts are that vide notification dated 11.12.1995, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, `the Act'), State of Haryana acquired land situated in villages Jaliawas, Suthana, Suthani, Asalwas, Jalalpur, Chirhara and Rudh, Tehsil Bawal, District Rewari for development as Industrial Growth Centre at Bawal. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, `the Collector') vide award dated 15.9.1997, assessed the compensation of acquired land @ ` 1,25,000/- per acre for Chahi and ` 6,00,000/- per acre upto depth of two acres on both sides of highway along with statutory benefits. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the land owners filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below assessed the market value of the acquired land @ ` 8,00,000/- per acre for the land upto the depth of 500 yards on both sides of National Highway No. 8 and ` 6,00,000/- per acre for the remaining land. It is this award which is impugned by the landowners by filing the present appeal. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the issues raised in the present appeal are squarely covered by judgment of this court in RFA No. 3541 of 2006 – Nand Ram and others vs State of Haryana and others , decided on 14.9.2010. Aforesaid fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the State. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of in terms of aforesaid judgment. 7.1.2011. (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge