The Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy Writ Petition No.1581 of 2010 Order: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition appearing for respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 and Smt.Kalpana Ekbote, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.3- Corporation. With their consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the stage of admission. In this Writ Petition, the petitioners are questioning the action of respondent No.2 in issuing revised notice No.B/818/2008, dated 16-01-2010, directing them to handover their mulgies bearing Municipal H.Nos.6-3-790/B/2, 6-3-790/B/B, 6-3- 790/B/3 and 6-3-790/B/4 admeasuring 24.4 square yards, 24.04 square yards, 27.77 square yards and 25.40 square yards respectively situated at Ameerpet, Hyderbaad, and referring the matter to the civil Court under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (for short ‘the Act’), as being illegal and arbitrary. In the affidavit, filed in support of the Writ Petition, it is stated that respondent No.2 issued Form-3 Notice, dated 14-08-2008, under Section 5-A of the Act and thereafter, Form No.7 notice, dated 10-12-2008, under Sections 9 (3) and 10 of the Act stating that the abovesaid lands along with the lands of some others are required for public purpose and seeking to acquire the same. In the said notices, the different extents of lands occupied by the petitioners were mentioned as 32-16 square yards, 25-17 square yards, 24-02 square yards and 25-66 square yards. Subsequently revised notice, dated 16-01-2010, was issued under Section 12 (2) of the Act stating that award has been passed for the land admeasuring 107-01 square yards, which includes the lands of all the four petitioners. Aggrieved by the same, petitioners filed this Writ Petition. It is submitted by learned Counsel for the petitioners that in the earlier notices issued to the petitioners, different extents of lands occupied by them were mentioned, but the revised notice of award under Section 12 (2) of the Act, was passed for the entire extent of land admeasuring 107.01 square yards in favour of not only the petitioners but also the occupants of the first floor and terrace and as such, the extents earlier mentioned were not tallying with the total extent mentioned in the revised notice. It is not in dispute that all the mulgies under the occupation of the petitioners are situated in the same building and the revised notice of award has been passed for the entire extent of 107.01 square yards. On instructions, it is submitted by Smt.Kalpana Ekbote, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent-Corporation, that in view of the further claims having made by the owners in occupation of the first and the second floors of the very same building after passing of the award, the matter is referred to the civil Court. In view of the rival claims, the matter has already been referred to the Civil Court. Even if there arises any dispute interse among the petitioners with regard to apportionment of the compensation, they can agitate their claims before the Civil Court itself. Mere non-mentioning of the different extents of their lands in the revised notice itself is not a ground to entertain this Writ Petition. As no other question arises and as the matter is already referred to civil Court, I do not find any merit in this Writ Petition so as to admit the same. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed at the stage of admission. However, it is open to the petitioners to file their claim petitions before the competent civil Court for award of compensation to their lands along with the structures raised thereon. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ R.Subhash Reddy, J Dated 1st February, 2010 lur