';< IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHA'mSGARH WRIT PETITION No. /c4'-</2006 PETITIONER ^ ,<>- ^^ ^s^ ^l"'>''•-' ..-•"^••' ^y'..--" ^•^•:"'...••••'" ^ ^SiPO'NDENTS f> .^ l^l" .^ A ^ .^. /I. ^ ^y ^ /3. o^^i^ %.o Smt. Hemanti Ekka W/o Shri Iliyas aged about 27 years, R/o - Village Lekhapal, Block- Manpur, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Manpur Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Head Master, Vaikalpik (Unnayan) Primary School, Retegaon, Manpur Distt. Rajnandgaon PETITION UNDER A11T1CLE 2J26/227 OF 'rHE_CCtHS'OTUTION OF INDIA ~3^ "^i^K't'i, ®t(i^<lio,TsK'ti'yy , ^ . U3.f.^.. *<i*ini {*»HIC»» 3(I^?t'lR5S' (1^f3^E() sii^t ^i R-ii* TOIT SffI^I sli«4 ig^l^R: W?t( sn^ii SB: Kon. Mr.Justice Pritinkfer Diwaker Shri Anup Majumd^ Shri Yashwant Sirj SmithaGhaiPLfor) Shri Amrito Das coijnse! I- counsel for the petitioner. ^h Thakur Dy. AG and Smt. |he respondents No. 1 and 3. for respondent No.2. artd Case of the petitioner is as instructor in Panchayat Subsequentiy, after up-gradati4n Ji under Sarva Shiksha Abhiy^ pay scate of contract petitioner was terminated 22.2.2006 and it is the said tet- challenge in this petition. teachfer frdm Contention of the couns^l filing of the, present petition, th^ videorder dated 29.6.2006 ps now the limited relief of the pef salary for the period 22.2.2006 ^f^^f 'RPTOf ^ 'fec^ •ri^J^'K i;3jlOT3ii^r jthat initiatly she was appointed Rural Welfare Department. ^n, she was appointed as Guru ^n scheme and was given the Grade III. Thereafter, the service vide order dated ^mination order which is under for the petitioner is that after ^ petitioner has been reinstated ^ssed by respondent No.2 and ^itioner is in respect of grant of to 29.6.2006. 5^S& 1 ~^J/ '^s- ^ss^s.y- XI-HC—78 an^il^lftti^ ^T ^n^T sR^F "V •s- '3'ST "MnK'i'q, a\fty'l]<o, isl^l-y^ *1(*(flTSh*f|tt» •WI..200 an^i tra^ (1pf3^p) Counsel for the petrtioni very iow paid employee circumstances she is workind that the respondents have g<] scheme and the salary for the) her by them. Lastiy, he submi| a suitable representation to direction for deciding the sarfie payment of satary for the submission of the counsel fcjr respondents, have no objecti^n. Accordingly, the the representation, if any, period of three weeks from accordance with taw. respor(dent qirafepfri•WRS 4-fstA xtegK ^sfRwati^r ^r submits that the petitioner is a and under the compeiling as Guru Ji. He further submits <t>t sufficient fund under the said jaforesaid period can be given to i^ that the petitioner would make [respondent No.2 and seeks a sympathetically and to make ^forementioned period. To this the petitioner, counset for the No.2 is directed to decide r(iade by the petitioner within a |:he date of its receipt strictly in The petition is thus disp(3sed of in the afore-stated terms. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge