IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.370 of 2010 MANISHAKE KUMAR RAO @ CHHOTU RAO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 22.02.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioner is that the allegation was against unknown under Sections 279 and 304A of the Penal Code to which Sections 302 and 394 have been added. The allegations are specific of a road accident. The impugned order of rejection from the case diary notices nothing with regard to the scientific investigation done in the nature of the allegation of road accident. Learned Counsel for the State is unable to show any aspect on this line from the case diary. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM West Champaran (Bettiah) in Lauria PS Case No. 97 of 2009. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)