IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12765 of 2009 MADAN MOHAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- With CWJC No.12788 of 2009 JOTISH CHANDRA & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- With CWJC No.12854 of 2009 JAI PRAKASH KANTH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- With CWJC No.12871 of 2009 PROF.DR.RIYASAT HUSSAIN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 18.9.2009 Since in all these writ applications, the grievances of the petitioners is against the same University, with consent of the parties, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondent-University as also the State. It is submitted that the grievances of the petitioners are with regard to the payment of retiral dues. After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners submit that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as raised in these writ applications, the petitioners propose to file separate representation before the respondent-Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga. In case such representations are filed stating the details of their claims distinctly and separately as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of 2 such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the above respondent shall consider the grievances of the petitioners as raised in their representations and dispose of the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representations, so that the grievances of the petitioners with regard to the payment of the retiral dues with statutory interest could be settled without delay. All these writ applications stand disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)