CWP(T) No. 6766/2008 (OA 2368/2000) 21.04.2010 Present: Dr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents. During the pendency of the present petition the petitioner’s services have been regularised w.e.f. 1.4.1998. The petitioner who was initially employed as a daily wage helper is in fact seeking wages of Clerk-cum-typist. That the petitioner has discharged his services as Clerk is seriously disputed by the respondent/State. The disputed question of fact cannot be gone into in this petition. It is open for the petitioner to take recourse to such remedy as is available to him in accordance with law. Hence no further orders can be passed and the petition is disposed of as such. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. April 21, 2010 (PK)