IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND TEN CONTEMPT CASE Nos.174 & 175 of 2010 Between: CC 174 of 2010: E.Sattaiah CC 175 of 2010: Bukka Basheer. … Petitioners And Sri Dana Kishore, IAS, District Collector, Ranga Reddy District and others. (Both the cases) … Respondents (Both the cases) Counsel for the petitioners: Sri D.Rama Krishna for Sri M.Ratna Reddy. Counsel for the respondents: GP for Revenue. This Court made the following: COMMON ORDER:- These two Contempt Cases are filed alleging willful disobedience of order, dated 30-10-2008, in Writ Petition No.11334 of 2002 and batch. By the said order, this Court directed proper survey of Jennawada and Kollur villages to be conducted to know as to the actual survey numbers in which the petitioners have been allotted the lands by respondent No.3 and the revenue villages in which the said survey numbers were included during the survey and settlement operations. Alleging willful violation of the directions given by this Court, the petitioners filed the present Contempt Cases. Respondents 2 and 4 filed separate counter- affidavits. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the said two respondents have taken conflicting stands regarding the availability of land. He also submitted that on the basis of the purported survey report, no orders have been passed by the respondents. Having heard the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and having regard to the stand taken by the respondents that the land is not available, I am of the view that it cannot be said that the respondents are guilty of violating the orders of this Court. However, to enable the petitioners to question the stand of the respondents on the availability of land, the respondents are bound to pass appropriate orders and communicate the same to the petitioners. Accordingly, both the Contempt Cases are closed with the direction to respondent No.1-District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, to pass appropriate orders on the basis of the survey reports and communicate the same to the petitioners within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioners are entitled to question the said orders, if they feel aggrieved by the same, by availing appropriate remedies. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:06-4-2010 MNR