IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18041 of 2008 BADRI NARAYAN YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 16.09.2008 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the informant, who files Vakalatnama. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offence under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been implicated in this case falsely for which he had filed an informatory petition also. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State, on perusal of the case diary, submits that the allegation against this petitioner is direct and specific and besides the allegation in the first information report, in course of investigation the informant was examined under 164 Cr.P.C. in which she has reiterated the allegations. Considering the nature of allegation levelled against this petitioner and its seriousness, I am not inclined to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail. His prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)