IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.910 of 2008 Sunil Kumar Jha, son of Sri Basudeo Prasad Jha, resident of Village- Nayagaon, P.O.:- Basudeopur, P.S.:- Kotwali, District- Munger. …….Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director (Research & Training) Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Education Officer, Munger at Munger Distt.-Munger. 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Munger,Distt.-Munger. 6. The Sub-Divisional Education Officer, Munger, Distt.:-Munger. ……Respondents. ----------- 2. 01. 09. 2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Respondents-State. The case of the petitioner is that he was wrongly not included in the selection list for appointment of Nagar Madhyamik Shikshak in the district of Munger, although candidates with lesser marks were included in the list. In the supplementary affidavit it is stated that when the petitioner made inquiries he was informed that due to his training certificate issued Oxford College of Education, Calcutta, which was not taken as recognized Institute by the State Government, his name was not included in the list. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that said Institute has been recognized and accepted by the concerned respondents and they have appointed candidates having the said certificate from the said Institution. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that 2 the petitioner has filed a representation before the Sub-Divisional Education Officer, Munger in this regard to consider the same in accordance with law. In the circumstance, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the Respondent-Sub-Divisional Education Officer, Munger to consider the representation (copy of which annexed as Annexure-9) and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner shall be at liberty to produce additional materials before respondent for consideration of his claim. m.p. ( J. N. Singh, J.)