HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.24465 of 2011 Date: September 06, 2011 Between: 1. Muppidi Radha Krishna & another … Petitioners and 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad & 3 others. … Respondents * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.24465 of 2011 O R D E R: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Home. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners/tenants points out the only grievance of the petitioners that the respondent police are interfering with the possession of the land admeasuring Ac.8.59 cents in Survey Nos.290/2/A, 290/2/B, 261/2, 261/3, 261/4, 261/5 and 260/1 situated at Chinna Brahmadevam village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, and that in order to protect their possession, they have filed A.T.C. No.2 of 2010 on the file of the Special Officer for Tenancy Cases, Peddapuram, and obtained interim injunction. The allegations in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition state that police personnel of the respondent police station are harassing the petitioners compelling them to vacate the premises at the instance of M.L.A, who is supporting the owners. 3. Respondent No.4 has filed a counter-affidavit stating that one Lanka Bobby filed a complaint on 04.7.2011 stating that the petitioners and one M. Satyanarayana trespassed into the land, on an extent of Ac.8.59 cents, situated at Chinna Brahmadevam village, Peddapuram Mandal, by abusing in the name of his caste and threatened with dire consequences and that a case in Crime No.262 of 2011 was registered. Paragraph 11 of the said counter- affidavit categorically shows that respondent No.4 is not interfering with the civil disputes of the petitioners. It is also stated that except receiving complaint from the petitioners and others, the respondent police did not interfere with the civil disputes of the petitioners at any point of time. 4. In view of the said categorical statement in the counter- affidavit, no further orders are required in this matter. 5. Recording the above specific stand of the fourth respondent, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ____________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J Date: September 06, 2011. BSB