Cézw#r— IN THE HIGH COURT OF‘ CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( s ) No. 7%70f 2010 PETITIONER: K Raghunath Jaiwante S/o Shri Kishan Lal, aged about 52 years, occupation service, Assistant Block Education Officer, Block Dondi, District Durg (CG). Versus The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). ‘ The Commissioner, Public Instructions Raipur, (CG). The Collector, Durg, District Durg (CG). 4. (“District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg (CG) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Durg, District Durg (CG). RESPONDENTS: 1 Chhattisgarh, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE N CONSTITUTION OF INDIA I J HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 7237 of2010 Raghunath Jaiwante. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shn‘ S.K.Thomas, Advocate for the petitioner. Shn' Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 26 day ofJu1y, 201 1) Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that the petitioner has already continued at the original place of posting ’ for more almost one year on account of interim order granted by this Court on 13.01.2011. The State/respondents may be granted liberty to‘pass appropriate orders keeping in view public interest and administrative exigency. Shri Thomas further submits that the State/respondents shall not insist upon compliance ofthe impugled order dated 15.07.2010 (Annexure P/l) in respect ofthe petitioner. At this stage, when no effect could be given to the impugned order dated 15.07.2010 (Annexure P/l) on account of the interim order dated 13.01.2011, thus, it is not necessary to go into legality and validity of e aforestated impugned order. In View of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. 1i Sci/- ‘ ‘ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge r J .