IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4277 of 2010 1. SATRAJEET SINGH SON OF SATYADEO SINGH 2. SHAMBHU SINGH SON OF JOKHU SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.4880 of 2010 1. NAGINA YADAV SON OF MAGARU YADAV 2. SATAN PATEL SON OF YOGENDRA PATEL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.2.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the first information report the informant has stated that three days after her husband left his house Md. Attaullah and Md. Ishlam came and told her that her husband had been done to death by seven named and 3 to 4 unnamed persons in which the petitioners were also named. However, the informant gave statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., wherein even though she states that these two witnesses came and told her that her husband had been killed but no names had been disclosed by them. There is no explanation as to why these alleged witnesses who had seen the occurrence did not make any report anywhere about the matter. Under the circumstances, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to - 2 - the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate (Railway), Bettiah, West Champaran in Sugauli (Bettiah) Rail P.S.case No.49 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and (ii) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )