IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 5643 of 2011. Decided on: 20.7.2011. __________________________________________________________ Bhuvnesh Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 4. ___________________________________________________________ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral). The petitioner is PTA appointed teacher. No doubt going by the orders passed by the competent authority, he is eligible to be appointed. But, it appears that there is no vacancy since the vacancy has been filled up by the 6th respondent, who is a regular teacher. However, in case the petitioner is in a position to point out any vacancy where the 6th respondent is willing to work, the 2nd respondent shall shift the 6th respondent to that vacancy and the petitioner shall be re-engaged forthwith in the resultant vacancy. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. (Justice V.K. Sharma) July 20, 2011. Judge. (cr/virender)