1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2894 OF 2010 Laxmi Daulat Jagtap and others. -: VERSUS :- Vice Chancellor, Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krushi Vidyapeeth and another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : OCTOBER 06, 2010. Heard Shri S.D. Chopde, learned Counsel for petitioners and Shri A.A. Kathane, learned Counsel for respondents. Petitioners before this Court claim to be working on daily wages with respondents since last 20-25 years. They filed ULP Complaint challenging an advertisement issued by the respondents to fill in about 250 Class-IV post and also sought interim relief to restrain the respondents-employer from recruiting fresh persons. That relief has been rejected by the Industrial Court. Shri Chopde, learned counsel contends that in view of the long service, availability of work and the provisions of Model Standing Orders, the petitioners need to be given necessary protection and interim relief. He is placing reliance upon the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court 2 reported at (2009) 8 SCC 556 (M.S.R.T.C. .vrs. Castribe Rajya Parivahan Karmachari Sanghtana). Shri Kathane, learned Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 has invited attention to the consideration of earlier challenge by me in Writ Petition Nos. 623 and 624 of 2010 on 23.03.2010. With the assistance of both the learned counsel, I have perused the papers. It appears that the challenge in Writ Petition Nos. 623 and 624 of 2010 was identical. This Court has for reasons recoded, found it not proper to interfere and employees were given liberty to move the Industrial Court for expeditious disposal. In view of these orders, I am not inclined to interfere in the present petition also. The liberty as given to petitioners in Writ Petition Nos. 623 and 624 of 2010 is also extended to present petitioners. The learned Member of Industrial Court is directed to decide ULP Complaint No.121/2009 along with ULP Complaint Nos. 3,4, and 5 of 2010 at the earliest. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. JUDGE Rgd.