IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1955 of 2010 SHIV RAM SON OF LATE CHARITRA, R/0- YARPUR AMBEDKAR COLONY, P.S. GARDANIBAGH, DISTRICT - PATNA Versus 1. COMMISSIONER CUM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDH MARG, PATNA. 2. EXECUTIVE OFFICER NUTUN RAJDHANI ANCHAL PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PATNA. ----------- 02. 04.02.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the respondent – corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of March 2009 as Safai Mazdoor from the officer of respondent – Corporation, retiral dues of the petitioner have not been settled as highlighted in the writ application, despite representations filed by the petitioner as contained in Annexures 2 and 3 till date. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his claims, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 1. In such view of the matter, in case such representation giving specific claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider each of the claims raised by 2 the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and admitted dues along with statutory interest could also be paid to the petitioner. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)