IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBUASPUR W.P. (227) No.: 7^/^/2010 PETITIONER NON-APPLICANT 1) Shravan Agrawal, S/o Shri Madan Lal Agrawal, Aged about 53 years, R/o Belgahana, Tahsil Kota, Thana Kota, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS APPLICANTS ^.*ya.-';...„,2°,'tf.) ^v^^ \lp.-' ..ASi.&..••• VERSUS ; 1) Madan Lal Agrawal, S/o LateShri Jai Lal Agrawal, Aged about 81 years 2) Smt. Triveni Devi Agrawal, W/o Shri Madan Lal Agrawal, Aged about 70 years Both R/o Belgahana, Tahsil Kota, Thana Kota, District - Bilgspur (C.G.), Current Address - Shrikant Verma Marg, Sai Parisar, D-Block-203, House No., District Bilaspur (C.G.) PETITION UNDERARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •^w irft HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGASH AT BHASPUR S.B: Hmi'Ue SlniPl'ashanf Kiumar Mshra WritPtetitiunaS2?yNo.7S't&2010 PETITIONER RESPQNDENTS Shravan Agrawal Madan LalAp'awaI and anofter Aiwearance: Shri Harsh Wm-dhan, eounsel for the petitioner. WIUT»»Tn'IG^I%m^Al CI^227WTHE GONSTlTUriON£W1N1»A ORALORDER (16.12.2010) The inyugned order graBting tBtCTnn mainteianee has been passed by Ae leamed Fainily Court in exereise of poweis under section 125 ef Cr.P.C., directing tfae petttionerto grant iaterim maiirtaiaaee @ Rs.3000/- per mcuAtohis mo11ier,iesp<MidentNo.2. (2) Thennpug^^orteisnotainteiloNitcryordet^butisaa^ orderdecidmgtherightsoftteparti^atmtenmst^eandis the revisional jurisdictioa undersection 19 (4) ofthe Fdnaly C<wrts Act, 1984. (3) fa view of availability of altemative remedy, this court is aot inclined to entetain tins petiti<m, it &ils and is hCTeby ^isnussed as aot maintainable. (4) The cerdfied copy of Ifae ia^gned <xrfw be ^ the petiti<mer on stq»plyingxwox copy ofthe same sad&bertyis reserved iri &VOUT offlie peritKmerto file aduly constitutedwvtsion uiriea-sectiofl 1$ (4) oflfae FamUy Courts Act, 1984. Sd//- PrashantKumarMishra Judge