^ le* 11:11 HIGHCOUR-FOFCHHATnSGftRHATBil.ASPUR Writ Retitic»(slNo.3848 of2005 ApDlicant \/ersus ResDondents :1. ^Dwarta grseacl ©hiandraa»nofShrj JagdisltPrasaclGII'randrai^eS&yeais, ^AssUt^rieaeheT,?|:^ect at PrimarySchod KatalttsQntKhtlrcl.BlQck Dabhara, Distfiet Jarygir, Cttlirttisgarh. SK Throygh°-S relarys, SGhopl EclueaBon Department, Mantra|a^i,DiK^.tBhawan,Raipur Chhattjsgai-h. 2. Direcfor, PubljglHsbucttonGhhatti^arh, PenSionBada,f^ipur(CHhatti^arh). 3. DisttictEducaUogf'^fflcer, Dish-ictJanjg6eF;CKampa, Chhattisgarh. , Hon'bleSlMiSaUstjK.IAcmihotei.J. Present: j h!||i^u^m^bey,Adv^ |^gSuni<a^jW,t%iheKlan^F^r^ire||s^fle(ri^State. ORDER r:,.:')l ' 1: ' ^ • : .I ^ t^a^^cmV^i4m^ay^<^ 1.^ Th& petition^r, while working as Assfetant! Teacher at Rrimary School, l^^ns Khurd, was tran^n^ to^ hkiktakala on the same terras and Kiinditiohs vtele impugnecl transferorclerclated10.9.2001(A/t). 2. The Madhyaj Pradesh State ^^inistra^ Tribunal, Bench at Raipur, vide jnterim onferielaj^cj^g.2Q04,|tUnect^ t6 r^ status quo in regard to fhe position ®fttie prtitionMias M@S ^prewatlingcin 22^9^001.. Byrvirtye<^ithe irtterihi orater, ttie petiUoner isrc<^nuingaMhe't>ngmiali|yacei?fpc^ing. i :3.:;:.Be 'tliat^asijjt imay,.::wJSii^isj^s^agi||!0|; M^.^S^S^SS&iS^SSM^ bMom®infm2K^i^,;^|;>e^|ffi)<;a|sU^^iis Atithis pbint oftin't&tierejltsgioEciBi^in^^saniUiefc fcis RiOfe [<SvaSS ^^ ;-.t'i!!l.:::!! gi.'i.;!;! sf& i*rf i, Iffi^l ^M^.^V ;KisiBy!rtHCT's:>teffiit.iiaati8saiaa;iaa!aaiBiiia! :w^ ^.?,; sn (,?• the transteorder.Ho< ve^t|ref^|MrKlentsare^UKB^ appropriate oreters keeplng ih view the publie Interest and acteninistrative exigency. without insteting on eomplianee of the impugned?tiSSisferorclCT. 4. It is s l| setUed pnnciple <rf law"t^ transfer is an ineideme of service and jtfe fcr Uie emptoyerto deckle as to wh@re a |MrUcular ^"\.-i '..:'y. ^,~::';; ...1:^''' ^.::.:-'/; .r.''^ officer/employee be posted keepilig in view^ public intereSt as;well as administeathre exigency. This Court has limited junsiellctfoh to interfere with the iTansfBr matter and this Court can entertain judiciat review pnly in flie case of proved malafide; non- compet^ce of auttority passing the transfer ca-der and teansfer ordernotbeinginconformitywiththeFulwandregulatio^^ 5. In viewof^e above.thispetitionstarafe^isppsedo^ tocoSts. .' • ! ' . ' •. •:^:.,' : '.' Sd/- Sadsh K. Agnihotri ^ \ Judge Itjjl^^iy^^^^iiiaBii