IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20936 of 2009 KAMLESH BHUIYAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 10.08.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 392 of the Penal Code. It is contended that F.I.R. is lodged against unknown. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that apart from the fact that he is required in other case also there is nothing against him on record. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State, on the contrary opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner was put on T.I.P. and was identified by as many as two persons i.e. informant and his son. Having regard to the said fact, this court finds no merit in the application. Prayer for bail is, accordingly, dismissed. However, if the trial of the case is not taken up within one and half year from today, petitioner shall have liberty to renew prayer for bail. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)