-^ (^ ^~ IN THE fflGH COURT OF JIJDICATVRE AT BILASPUR:C.G. W.P.no. 37 /200A / PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS : Balla Ram Pal, aged 35 yrs., s/o Sm-i Pannulal Pal, a labourer, Arang, r/o Sheetala para, Arang, tahsil Arang, dist. Raipur, C.G. V E RS U S. 1. StateofChhattisgarh,throughSecretary to the Ministry of Home Affairs, D.K.Singh Bhawan Secretariat, Raipur,C.G. >•' ^ «-^^-^ / ^'^.'^ 2- The Supermtendent ofPolice, Raipur,C.G. ^'. .^*J^**^ 3- The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Raipur, C.G. .. .^ °>9^ •^^ o^-'' ^ 4. The Station House Ofncer, Police Station Arang,dist. Raipur, C.G. '^1.^. ofThe Constitution oflndia: XI-HC-22 37T^T'^T f<rli?h 3T1^T $t»*iict»^f^a ^ ^ ~?^ ^141d4^ *<1*1<!(11 $b^|ch 3T^r xpra? ^.....iM.^^Ck^........;.^ 200 fci^^ar' 3^TT^T'^n^R'^ffn 18.06.2004 Shri Bhisnia Kingar, counsfc Shri Saadeep Dubey, Pane| AppMcatiou for zirgent heartng, ifaxiy, is allowed, Heard, This order shali also g6ver|) Nos.36/2004, 37/2004 &38/^ nature, fhe disposal offhe Writ Petition |004, as the same are of siniilar The petitioner has preferr^d 226/ 227 of the Constitution 4 prosecution under Section 110 No.2/ 02 ancl on accotint of the Leamed counsel for tli^ petitioner is workiug as Haaial a subBiitted that the petitioner is activities for fhe welfare of the also subiaitted tliat 'as fhe petil(ioner trade union, fhe respondehts in. few cases aad the petitioner few cases but siibseauently, he F^Pft^ TTTO^f"^ fe^ <f^t^l< ^ ^Tf^FT 3TT^T 11 for tlie petitioner. Law^?rer for the State. a|le fhis writ petition under Article l>f India being aggrieved by his |)f Cr.P.C. arisuig out of a Istgasa peged police harassinent, petitioner subinitted tb.at the Anaaj Maadi,Araiig. It is ftirther also participafmg in trade unioii llamals aad other persons. It is is an active member of tlie ha^e falsely iaiplicated the petitioner |^as also arrested l3v fhe potkte ui Iwas releasecl on bail. He further ' [^^Rs^ h XI-HC-22 3?TT^T'5FT f<'l1<=b 3Tlt?T $ft*4ich ^f^a ~sr: \, ^. 'ysr ^Trqj^, ^Ti1^i<o/ fa 3^?T X[5ra? .^Ji^.......^ : Hi*«!rii^q^*———————••—"••——^p^ 200 fsR^ar' 3?TT^T^cff^T'HftcT -z.+' subinitted that fhe petitioner wa| from the Distdct Raipzir, Learn^ proceedings agaiast the petitio|i accordaiice wifh law ultimately,| favour of the petitioner for want o^ Learaed counsel for tii4 rcsppndents xaay be directed iio| proceed again.st .fhe petitioner ia 4 process oflaw. also prosecuted for exteminent i|sd coiinsel subraits fhat, as fhe o|o.er has not beeii initiated in. the said case was decided ni aay adverse evidence. petitioner subxaits fhat fhe I: fo arrest, prosecute, harass or |my xaaiiner without foUowiiig dzie Shri Dubey, Panel Lawyer| pending against the petitioner bzl conteirtiou has been filed, pendiiig agaiast hun. Under these circumLStances it would be appropriate to direct petitioners aiid if they waat to agaiast tliem.^ it shozild be done GM^t<n<i1ri ^itH<rff'? fs^ <rai<^i< '^^T^m^n^T Retura on behalf offhe res^ondents has liot been filed. subiaits fhat few cases arc still t no dociinient ia szipport of the Leamed counsel for fhe p^titioner submits fhat no case is fhis Cozirt is of the opiiiion fhat 1pie respondents not to harass the initiate aay enquny/px'oceediag strictly ia accordaiice wifh fhe law, [^^sl^ XI-HC-22 3?n^T^T ^i<=h 3T1^T sft^iicti <if^a ^ f^^»t.^ ¥^ ^ + ^ST '^qt^ri^, ^^^ WWrTT 9b^licb 3^^r TRW ..^..(>.....^Sj..<p..w. "W^ 200 I^^T' So far as fhe atleged v coucemed, tlie petitioners, if so a^ Rights Coiamiission for rederesss petitions are filed before fhe look mto fhie matter and after he fhe matter would decide fhe sasiie With the aforesaid dlre petitlon stands disposed of. A copy of this prder be 37/2004 & 38/2004 also. Certified copy as per Rul| CoxiliLlnission, <=hl^f<yl<fll 'HTR^f ^ f^<<^ <Fai^l< ^" ^rf^TH ^n^r Jiolation of Humaa Rights are l^vised, may approach fhe Hzinian. 1 of their grievaaces aad if such i, the C-ommission would ^nrig all the concemed parties in. iii accordaace wifh law. :>tions and observations, this placed in W.P. Nos. 36/2004, :s, Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^^f^ •'^