IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 23RD FEBRUARY 2010 / 4TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 5311 of 2010(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER : ------------------- V.V.SANTHOSH, VALIYA VEETTIL HOUSE, PAYYANAKKAL, P.O. KALLAYI, KOZHIKODE-3. BY ADV. MR.P.CHANDRASEKHAR RESPONDENTS : ---------------------- 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOZHIKODE. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER,KOZHIKODE. 4. M.PRAMEERAN, S/O. SAMIKUTTY, MANNAMBALATH HOUSE, PANNIYANKARA, KALLAYI. P.O., KOZHIKODE-3. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JVT T. R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No. 5311 of 2010 --------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of February 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner herein had raised a complaint against the 4th respondent with regard to the irregularities in the conduct of ration shop No.139. The petitioner is a ration card holder under the very same ARD. The city Rationing Officer, South, Kozhikode temporarily suspended the license of the 4th respondent and attached ARD No.139 to ARD No.72 as per Ext.P2 order. The District Collector in an appeal restored the same for a period of three months on a temporary basis, and the said order has been produced as Ext.P4. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has filed a revision petition before the Commissioner as per Ext.P5 along with a stay petition. 2. The 4th respondent had approached this court earlier by filing W.P.(C) No. 4186 of 2010 to implement Ext.P4 and W.P.(C) No. 5311 of 2010 -2- this Court disposed of the matter recording the statement of the respondents that steps are being completed to implement the same. 3. In that view of the matter there will be a direction to the 1st respondent to take a decision on Ext.P5 revision petition after hearing the petitioner and the 4th respondent within a period of two months. 4. It is clarified that the implementation of Ext.P4 will be subject to final orders to be passed in Ext.P5 revision petition. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. T. R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE Jvt