THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.697 OF 2010 DATED:29-01-2011. Between G.Bheemasekhar … Petitioner-Plaintiff And K.Eswaraiah …Respondent-Defendant THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.697 OF 2010 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order, dated 06-10-2009 in I.A.No.189 of 2009 in O.S. No. Nil of 2009 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Uravakonda, whereunder and whereby the application filed under Section 151 CPC to condone the delay of 384 days in representing the plaint into the Court was dismissed. 2. As seen from the record, it is clear that the plaint was returned on 09-06-2008 for complying certain objections duly giving seven days time to represent the plaint, but the same was not represented within the time. There was a delay of 384 days in representing the same. The reason given by the counsel for the plaintiff was that the bundle was mixed up with other file and therefore, it could not be traced so as to represent the same before the Court. The affidavit filed in support of the application by the counsel for the party would clearly indicate that there are some laches on the part of the counsel in not representing the plaint. Such laches cannot be shown to be wanton or willful. Even assuming for a moment that there are laches on the part of the counsel, the same is not attributable to the party and the party cannot be suffered for the laches, if any, committed by the counsel. Therefore, trial Court ought to have condoned the delay of 384 days in representing the plaint. Hence, the revision has to be allowed. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed setting aside the order, dated 06-10-2009 in I.A.No.189 of 2009 in O.S. No. Nil of 2009 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Uravakonda. No order as to costs. -------------------- K.C.BHANU, J DATED: 29-01-2011 Hsd