)^-z$7 /- IN THE HIGH COURT OF TUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. •S'S'2£> OF 2010 PETITIONER: ^^" ^y ^^yy 'SS:>'Sy ..-'' ^' -s^ /•' "DIDWANIYA EXIM PRIVATE 'LIMITED", having its Registered office at Station Road, Raipur - 492001 (C.G.) acting through its Director, SHRI ASHISH S/0 SFTARAM DIDWANryA, Resident of Samta Colony, Raipur - 492001 (C.G.) ^^- 0;;'- RESPONDENTS: VERSUS f^ 1. UNION OE INDIA, acting through its Secretan/. MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, Gibvw^o^ ^- SwAiji.,, New Delhi (India) 2. DIRECTOR (RAIL MOVEMENT), Railway Board, Kolkata, West Bengal. 3. CHIEF OPERATION MANAGER (COM), East Coast Railw^ay, Bhubaneswar, Odisha. ^ 4. SENIOR DF^ISIONAL OPERATION MANAGER (Sr. DOM), East Coast Railway, Khurda Road, Odisha. r' 5. CHIEF FRIEGHT TRANSPORT -MANAGER (CFTM), East Coast Railway, Bhubaneswar, Odisha. ^?^^z?^S^'^.--'S^^'^'?^2i-E£T^?357^^3S?^!?5.^y-l^^'^UU^;.=KT ;!i;B?{qi)^ 1111%^®!!^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ 's WRnLFETrHOTLUNDERARTICLE^26PFTHE CONSTJTUTION OF INDIA^^QR ISSUAN£E QF APPROPRIATE WRITAVRITS, D!RECT!QNS,^RDERS ^TC^BL THE^ATURE OE MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY. QTHER SUITABLE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE HIGH^QURT^RCHHATTISGARMATBIIASPUR l!!'i PETmQNER WRITRETITIONrcaNd. 5539 6f 2010 DidwaniyaExlm PrivateLfmited VENSUS ' Union of India & Others. RESPONDENTS : WRITPETlTIQNUNDER»RTICLE226QI::Tt-IECONSTITUTIOhR)FINDIA ; SB:11on'bteShn^ishK.^nihb(Bi,J. Present: Shri Njkhil Agrawat, AGlvoeate for tfte petitioner. Ms. FouziaMirza.AssiStantSolieltorQeneralfortheUniopof India, : .' ^' :, :1:' '.',-::-, ,.:^,'' •,'.:. •:':' :-:,' ••:;.''^:.; <: •.:;::^^; • :.ORDER.(OR^):..,,.? :......,../^^^ (Passedon 25th day of September, 2Q10) t. Bythis petition, the petitioner, seeksadirection to the respondents to act inaceQrdancewiththeagreemententered.wlththepetitiener forsupplyingthebalanceofrakesofeoalagainsttetteFofjndent/ Annexure "D" (Annexure P-3 & P-4). Purther, not to sypply the balance rakesofcoal againsttheletterofindenyAnnexuFe''D'';i 2. Annexure P-3- is the sale document Spot E-Auction id^ed 27.01.2010,whieh was issuedbyCoat Sale CompanyofMahahadi Coal Fields Limited, Kolkata, to the Djrector (Rail Movement) Railway Board E. Rly House 17, Netaji SuBhas Road, t^)ll<ata. AnnexureP-4appearstobealetter,againissuectbythepetitiQner at Kolkata. Both the docymentsare not executed JB Raipur.T^ petitjonerclaimsareliefonthebasisthatShriAshish.Direetorof the petitioner, is a resident of Raipyr. Needless to fflention that all . the respondents are sjtuated out side the territorial jurisdiction flf the State of Chhattisgarh. ashok 4. 2 ^ On perusal ofthe averments and hearing tearned counsel for the petitioner, it is indisputable that cause of action, wholly or impart, does not arise within the jurisdictton of this High Court. It appears that two-three letter Annexure P-12, P-13 & P-14 were sent recently in the month of September, 2010 to create a cause of action. The entire agreement and the transaction had taken place out side the temtoriai jurisdiction of the State of Chhattisgarh, Thus, this petition is not maintainable for want of cause of aetion, as the cause of action, cannot be created on the basis of restdence of the petitioneror few letters, which have recently been issued. , Thus, the petition is dismissed, as not maintainable, ynder the provisions of Article 226 of the Constitution of India. ^^^ Isa^^A^