IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2011 / 30TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1672 of 2011(H) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- VISHNUDEV K.V., STANDARD X, H.S.KAKKAZHAM, AMBALAPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, REP. BY HIS FATHER, K.K.VASUDEV, CHIRAYIL VEEDU, NEERKUNNAM, VANDANAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-688004. BY ADV. SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR SMT.BHAVANA VELAYUDHAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ALAPPUZHA-688001. 3. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA-680001. 4. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 1672 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 20th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T In the Alappuzha Revenue District Level competition, petitioner participated in Ottanthullal and was given 2nd prize with A Grade. Appeal filed was rejected and that led the petitioner to file this writ petition. 2. The submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is mainly that the stage was uneven, and that, despite wide spread complaints, the defect was not rectified. Even if it is assumed that there is any substance in what the petitioner complains, fact remains that all the participants have performed on the same stage. If that be so, all of them would have suffered the same dissadvantage, and therefore, no prejudice special to the petitioner could have been caused warranting intervention of this Court. Therefore, I am not persuaded to interfere in the matter. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp