.6% ^ssj^s SK B1»»fr. •» t,. : > • .• " '. Ito., ^2-, FdtheB's Sa.me /- ^PP^L^OF^PSISQNER^/ -A—.-G- Kfame r«*(TW S3S-—,„-——. aeslddice ^••:^CT:^!W^T °WiT.-~WF-^i-^ "^y^^~ A9e -5-3-....-..sentsnced to __^3@Ta2..^dUais9-..^.... _^6_'.8^_9I< S.T.1to. l'y-6, on, under Sectl.on SJi2-.._3^t_(^y^^^T^^^^^S -SSTM^T^ It is explained to the prlsonec that if he sta'tesor Mishes to fce represented by a 1 egal practitlcosr the ^pellata Ccurt td.il not procesd vith the base for geven days unless the legal practitioner appeacs. If tbe legal practltoicner dces nct appear with the seven ddys he may be hedria at all If the prisoner states-thdt the does nct wish to be r^rsSoHtgij tey legdl prdctioner the c&urt n'lciy proceed at once wj.th ths case and will not be ofcliged tc jivs <a heaci.ng tp dny lega.1 proct- • Itionec who shculd appear. . 1. .te of. applladtion for copy cf judgemsnt ; /<l 12. 2. Ddt s of which copy rsceivefl —^. | 0 3. Date on •whieh ^ipelisent ;.-' "' 1° 4. tihether the prlsoner wlshea tse-fce V--^^ represented or nct "' ^yes^feTr-' _^. Q.. -S£^__- ..„ ^..^- fb._ji2___Na.me __~:^TViT" ~^7^~_ -Sj0 C?-/<<s?^_ Contlnued in ic.__sA.I^ _ 7es "ic>ir Jail - >=1 ^Dst ed' _iLll^L? Fc.rwarded to the CHIEi? JUD1CIAL MA3 3ST RAT E _^ tcgether with a ccpy of judgsnent or order p'a.^ed-in'-&he case fcr ravcur of tEdnsmIssion to''ths prop^as;^ppUate Qsurt. Superinte-a'^W^entral/Qi stt./ 'ViStff ^ihV,'!' Ddt e c;£ recsj.pt ln C.J.M's Offies. S-^^.jS-lO'S>4- Dat e of receipt of record of acccmpany. Memc- S>£. AppedjL of the .appelliate Cfcurt. A.\>-tO-i.j.4— 3^/11 . Dated 5.A)1Q'9^ ,, Forwarded tu the H,''^-l-!C*, Se-<i4tfcW( -rtLfck A_- "'3 3;%- 'Sfr-i<- •• ^ V-. sw^sia"e'.- A1 ' A't^ ^ l.o VA fl^ .;i.,^^^ ,y- ':'"^VVr^G-^ Magistrate '2^ ^j S\- )b '^ V^ ^ ^l°t>V<''l±ll vwfsw 1 W.^'w^A- Da'e'e'of recelpt o£ *terpelll4t«.6 Ccurtt tf^jt~'~^'~ ~' V"s, »»'"( f: ^.*. —.'r^.^. • •- .^'- • • .^-fy~¥ ^. •& '.. :.—•' •Xl-HC-22 ^^':qi'41f<<i, g^ETTg, 3:nt?i'w f?;iN'3TlS?I 'w^N?'^f^T e?« .&?A^.SS(^^ sii^r ?RIWH{N Division Bench: - Hon'bte Mr. L.C. Bhadoo and Hon'bte Mr. Dhirendra Mishra. JJ. 6-2-2006 Mr. ShaHendra Dubey, counsef Mr. U.N.S. Deo, ^lditional Pi|ibtic Panel L.awyerforfrie StaWrespontiertt. Orai judgment dictated on DaJ(. olfte Pw I..C. Bhadoo. J: - By thia appeal under Section | Mohan has quesBoned the legaltty sentence dated 26-8-1994 passed Jagdaipur, in Se^ions Trial No.1^/$4, Judge after holding acc.used/appellar(t Tsiamj offance under Secfon 302 of imprisonment for tife. tt^ ned< as a result of which Somaru wibiessed by Tefami Kondi (CTV-2) -. / f chi^iyi^'t BH^ ^ 1^^ ^' ^siPgiisn^! fortheappeltant. Proseeutor with Mr. I.P.S. Bhatia. 374 (2) ofthe Cr.P.C. appsllant Telaml' judgraent of convicfion and sxdor of by the 3rt AddtUonal Sessions Judge, I, whereby iearned AddiConai Se^ions t Tsiamj Mohan guitty fer commission of I.P.C., sentenced Wm to undergo Case of the prosecution, in tjrief, is that on 19-1-1994 at about 8-9 p.m. in tte night, when dei^sed S]omaru asked accused/appeilant Telami Mohan and other accused Telami Bfidhramthat why ttiey are not provkiihg food to hissister Telanri Kondi and n(aintaining her properiy, ttatenr^edtte accused personsand both oftheni s^rted beaSng Somaru with fists & kicks. They took him kmards the free, ac^used Telam! Budhram Idcted Wm and accused/appeUaht Telami Mohan aft^r catehing hold of e neck.twisted the ^ ^ Ibecame unconscious. The crime w^s Kunjami Lakhmi (PW-3). they Wed to intefvene,'s^Sainaru became unee|nseious thertfore they took Nm to the [^^fiOT XS-HC-22 ?^ •~i<l'llld'il, »Til*f'is,fefRty Sisff 'fewsn^r WTWHft^T iAttiBi.ah. (sy'.A^^Sft^ <flit5i?w^t'HiTO ~^+. residencs, they calted Kunjami Joga Somaru died. On 20th January, 1994,1 in Police Stetion: BhansL The occurrence and after giving notice Panchnama of the body of Somaru mortem to Primary Health Cerire, eondycted post-mortem and prepare^l inve^igafing officer prepared site ptenj (pW-1), and in ftie night at about 3 a.m. [Kunjaml Jogs iodged V\e repon Ex.P-1 inv^sfigating officer teft for the scene (rf ^x.P-2 to the Panchas, preparsd the ]Ex.P-3. Th®body was s*nt ft>r post- ^acheli, wher®Dr. G.R. Urrao (PW-6) the post-mortem repoit Ex.P-7. The |<rf 8ie place <rf occurrence Ex.P-5. ASer invesSgaCng, cftarge sh^et Magistrate, DantCTada, who in tum| Judge, Jagdaipur, from vrfiere, received the case on transferfor trial. eajmed • The prosecutioh in' order to persons eaamined Scc wtoesses. rscorded under Secflon 313 of th^ prosecution evidence, pteaded implicated in a faise erime. innoclewe Leamed Additionai Sessions A.G.I?. and counsel for the accus^d accused/appeflant Telaftii Mohan as whereasacquitted accused Teiami Bu^lhram We have heard learned counse The homteidal cteafiiofSomaru v •• / qiNwni iiimSv •WS <R!*^K ^•SlPOT 311^1 wras fileti in Sie Court of Judteiat eommitted the case to Ihe Sesslons 3rd Ackiftionai Se^tons Juctee ^stoblish charge against the aecused S^itements of1he accused perwris 'weve CrP.C. in which thsy denied the and stated Siat they have been (udge, aitor hearing "ttie argumsnts of persons convictsd and sentwfted Imentioned in para 1 of this judgment, forthe partes. is not in dispute. [^•^fe^ Xi-HC-22 SIR^f^T 1??iiai'an^T grtjN^ifiti a.ilis i;B^!!8: 's^ -^wwi, wAwis, 'feirey ®> ..&?....Ass^2_^ ><i><"ll W!ll<!»! Leamed counsel for flie argued ttiat there u@s no intenfloti deafli of Somaru. When Somaru other accused thatwhy ttiey are nc4 Tetemi Kondi properiy, that sudden, in a sudden quarrel, the with fists & kicte as a resutt of does nottrave! beybnd Section 304 part-1! accjused/appdlant Mr. Dubey, atttie outeet, of the accused/appellant to cause the ^tarted asking the accused/appdlartf and providing food and maintaining his sistBr ttie accused persons and all of a |aceused pereor®attackea the deceeeeil whteh Somaru died, ttierefore, the offence t-1iofShel.P.C. enraied On Vhe other hand, Mr. Deo s|upported e judgment (rfthe triai Court. As far as the invohrement o< concerned, Telami Kondi (PW-2) TelamiM<rfian and his brotfter-in.laW the residence, when she vras The accused persons carne and So.maru enquired from the accussdl to her, they stafted quarreiiing and|the Kunjami Lakhmi (PW-3) has G.R. Urrao (RW-6) has sterted in h|! of neck injury, there was a flScture! 1 & 2 cervical vertebra and ligam^nt eviderfce In view of this ocular tte accused/appeliant in 8ie crime t concemed, Teianii Kondi (BW-2) qii<i!rt4l-< iiprat''? fs^S <r»]t{i< ii' Sifigtf 3iT^l ttre appellant in ttie crime in question is has stated in her evidence that accused Telami Budhram attacked hte bnAer at to l^khmi, Somaru was at residence, ^tarted quarFelIing witti Somaru. When p?reons,whythey are not providing food attacked Somaru wifri fists and tegs. the above evidence <rf PW-2. Dr. |s ewdencs that SomaN diedon account in e spinal rtiord, multipte frachires in t-L was fbund fractured. laW talki(ig ndlttiey corrottorated jce and medtaal evidoTce, invoh/ement of 1 quesUon Is established. fl!) As far as the nature of crin^e commiUKi by theacciKedSappellant is has cleariy stated ihat inrtien dee^sed Somaru, (leyferOttser, asted ttte accjused Uiat wrtiy they are not providing food •a»>- [Tit^ ^Rsi^ 1 XI-HC-22 tiG.; 1?;n?'a;IRSl ^RWHffg Soma y^'^nqR^, ®TiiyITs,Mcii A.:S..5^/2^ sii^il^nwgfer ^ to her, ttiat enraged Ihe accused arjd he started assaufti'ng Somaru w !eg and flsts. circumlstanc^ FrSn flie above facts, ft is n<S assaufted <he deceased wtth jntenttoh inferred from the facis and accused twisted the neck <rf the kno'flrfedge that by twisUng the nec( Somaru. Therefofe, offenceagainst beyondSection 304 Part-11 ofthe !.P.<j;. instead flrtre<rf, In the result. the appeal allowed. Convtetion and sentence Secljon 302 of the I.P.C. afe sst asr Secfion302oftheI.P^;., Part-11 of the l.P.C. and sentencedl accuseci is in custody since20-1. leamed Addffional Pubik; Prosecutot already served out the sentence. He| inanyothercase. Parties aro entitled fer certified Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge wfejh iTOTCff-B fe%t xfw?re i? established that the accused/appeilant to cause his d^th. Further, it can be that the manner in which fte deceased, e accused had defintte , he may likely to cause the death of ttae accused/appeilant does mst trave! pa^ty succeeds and fte same is partly ^®rdedto ttie accused/appeilant under ijje and he is acquittod of charge under ^recS, he is convteted under Section 304 ID uhdergo R.l, for. tsn yeara. The i^94, whteh has not been disputed by I', thCTefore, e accused/appeliant has |beset at liberty forttiwiUi, if not required )»pytrf this orcter. Sd/-/ DhirendraMishra Judge [^^Rrt st>-