Petltioner Respondents HIQH COURT OF CHMATnSOARH! BILASPUR Wrtt PetiUon(Sl Na. SSQof 2008 T.R. Sahu, Age.about 42 years, Assistant . Teacher, S/o. Shri Bodhi Ram-Sahu, Govt. Primary Sehool, Naitiarpur, Blook - Narharpur, Distt-Kanker (CG). Versus 1) State of Chhatti^arh through Under Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. . Bhaw'ari, Raipur (CG), 2) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal WeHare Department, Distt. Kanker (03). 3) Block Education Offlcer, Narharpur, Distt Kanker(CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) ' SB: Hon'bte Mr. SaUsh K. Agnlhotri, J. Present-Shri S.K. Vemna, counse! for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORALORDER (Passedon Ist February, 2008) \ Learned counsel appearing for the petjtioner submits that hedoes not vant to pressthis matteron merit, except that the representetion of fhe petitioner afready fited on 15-1-2008 (Annexure P/4) before th® respondent No.2, be considered and deoided, in accordance with law as expedftiously as possibts, to whtoh learned counsel appearing for the respondertts/State has no objection. 2) Aocordingiy, the writ petition is dispesed of with a diredion to the r^ponderrt No.2 to conslder and dlsposeof the representation dated 15-1-2CX)8 (AnnexureP/4) filed by the petitioner, in aGcordance with law, as expedMously g®possible, pisterably within a perlod of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Raju Sd/- SadshK.Agnihotri j Judge