IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.2997 of 2009(O&M) Decided on : 12.10.2009 State of Punjab ... Appellant versus Ranjit Singh ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Nawab Singh, Addl. AG, Punjab for the appellant. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) In pursuance to order dated 12.08.2009, learned State counsel states that the total interest of Rs.17,272/- had been quantified by the Finance Deptt. The dispute is only with regard to rate of interest. Learned counsel states that in stead of 12% interest, interest should have been awarded @ 9% . If this difference is quantified, the total amount involved in the case, would be about Rs.4,000/-. Learned counsel further argued that the present is not a case which would be covered under Section 102 of CPC. In my opinion, even if that is so, the trifling amount of Rs.4,000/- odd would not justify interference by this Court under Section 100 of CPC. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed. No costs. October 12, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE