1 wp.3663.92 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3663 OF 1992 A.V.Dhakshikar and others. ... Petitioners Versus K.S.Sane Chairman of Board of Administrators Laxmi Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Limited and another. ... Respondents ----- Mr. M.G.Patil i/b Mr.N.N.Bhadrashete for the Petitioners. ----- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 18 th August, 2011. P.C. 1 Called out for final hearing. 2 The Petitioners are the disputants who have filed a dispute under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”). The dispute is filed for declaration that the Petitioners and other persons, whose names are appearing in Exhibit – J are entitled to cast their votes and to exercise all the powers of the members. In the said dispute, an application for 2 wp.3663.92 interim relief was made by the Petitioners on which by the order dated 31 st July, 1992, ad-interim injunction was granted in favour of the Petitioners. The order granting ad-interim injunction was challenged by the Society and certain Respondents by preferring an appeal. By the impugned order, the learned Member of the Co-operative Appellate Court allowed the appeal by setting aside the order dated 31 st July, 1992 and directed the Co-operative Court to decide the application for injunction within a time bound schedule. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners pointed out that during the pendency of this petition, the application at Exhibit – 5 has been decided and even the appeal against the order passed on the application at Exhibit – 5 has been decided. This writ petition arises out of an ad-interim order passed on the Application at Exhibit – 5. 3 In view of the subsequent events, the present petition does not survive and the same is disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. 3 wp.3663.92 4 It is made clear that all the contentions of the parties in the pending dispute are kept open and the Co-operative Court will decide the main dispute without being influenced by the tentative findings recorded in the impugned order. [ A.S.OKA, J ]