"y"' c^ BEFORE THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR. wp [S] yo.vh\~^../20io Petitioners: i ^0-:"^' ^-%.^- .^^s^sy?- '•S- 9<eA" Respondents: Smt. Neera Bai Yadav w/o Late Iswhar Dayal Yadav Aged about 45 yers, R/o Irrigatfon Colony, Jhunsekelar PO, Kharsia-(Tah.) Raigarh Dist. CG State Versus -" l.StateofC.G. Through: Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt.ofCG DKS Bhawan, Raipur. CG State. 2. Chief Engineer, Water Resources Deptt, Hasdeo Banko Project, Bilaspur, CG State. / 3. Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Minitnata Hasdeo Project, Kharsia, Raigarh Dist, CG State WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OP THE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITSFS] ORDERfSI DIRECTION(S1 ETC. •^.''Ws^.T... i ii?;:i3^!S^£?-^ '''<^Sl:£-:si-^:Si.- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASFUR WMT PETinQN (S) No. 3475 of2010 PETITIONER : Smt. Neera Bai Yadav. RESPONDENTS VERSUS : State ofC.G. & 2 Othei-s. WRIT PE'I'mON UN'DER AR'rKXE226.QF THECONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA 2. Preseiit: Sliri K.F,-.Nair, Advoeate for the petitioner. Stei P.K.Bfaaduri, Panei Lavn'er forthe Stats/responden.ts. 08DER (ORAL) (Passed on O Is1 dav of Februan-, 2011") Leamed counsel aopearing for the oetitioner submits that the petrtioner was appointed on daily wages basis on compassionate .ai-ound. However, m the communication dated 04.08.2004 (Atinexure P/6), it was clarified that if the compassionate appomtftient exceeds 10% oftbe vacancies, tlie appomtment on dai!v wages mav be considered for regulaiization. Sliri Bhaduri, leamed counsel appeariiig for the State/respondents submits that if a representation is made by the petitiocer, the sa.me shall be considered in accordance wrth the various executive instnictioas issued bv the State Govemmenl iii resuect of tlie grievance involved .n this case. SlTri Nau', learned counsel appearmg lor the petitioner submifs that ia vie.w ofthe above submission made by leanied couasei for tlie State/respondents, tlie petitioner does not waiit to press this petition on meitcs. However, the petrtioner mav be Dennitted to make a represeutation to the respondent authorities with a direciion to Ihe State/respondents to considei' the saine, as aiorestated. It is ordered accordmglv. Consequentiy, the writ petition is disposed of' with the aforestated ooservation and direction. ____-—~ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge