1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 192 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5054 OF 2003 (DECIDED) (Satyanarayan Swaroopnarayan Khandelwal .v. Chandrakalabai Ramsahay Khandelwal and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri Amit R. Chutake, Advocate h/f Shri S.N. Bhattad, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Sanchi Y. Jaiswal, Advocate h/f Shri Anjan De, Advocate for the respondent Nos.12 and 13(A) to 13(C). CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. 21ST JULY, 2010. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. By this Letters Patent Appeal, the appellant has impugned the order dated 20.03.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 5054 of 2003. In the writ petition, the appellant had challenged the order passed by the trial Court dated 09.12.2003 by which an application (Exh.262) filed by the respondent Nos.12 and 13 for impleading them in the suit was allowed. Respondent Nos.12 and 13 filed the application, claiming that they have purchased the property from the other respondents/defendants during pendency of the suit. In view thereof, the learned Single Judge, after considering the submissions urged by the learned Counsel for the parties and for the reasons recorded in paragraphs 8 to 11, held that they are necessary and proper parties in the suit and dismissed the writ petition. Having regard to overall facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any error in the orders passed by the learned Single Judge so also by the trial Court allowing respondent Nos.12 and 13 to be impleaded as party-defendants in the suit finding 2 them as necessary and proper parties. No case for interference in the appeal is made out. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE *rrg.