1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.75 OF 2003 IN SUIT NO.190 OF 1997 Anil Jagdish Verma. ...Petitioner vs. 1.Mrs.Archana Anil More and others. ...Respondents --- Ms.Suman Jain, for Petitioner. None for Respondent no.2. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 16th April,2007 P.C.:- 1. A Show cause notice against the respondent 2 nos.1 and 3 has, admittedly, been already discharged by the Court. Now remains only respondent no.2. As per the bailiff's report dated 13.4.2007 the whereabouts of respondent no.2 are also not known and therefore, he could not be served. The learned Counsel appearing for petitioner states that the respondent no.2 is a brother of the petitioner and the petitioner also is not aware about his whereabouts. In this view of the matter therefore, in my opinion, no useful purpose will be served by keeping this contempt petition pending. Hence, it is disposed of. ---