IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.3007 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.05.2011 Satish Kumar . . .Petitioner Versus Satish Kumar and another . . . Respondents ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.H.S. Bhullar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Sandeep Khunger, Advocate for the cateators/respondents. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the revision petition on merits. Hence, revision is dismissed on merits. However, he prays for one year time to vacate the demised premises as he is occupying it for the last 60 years. On the contrary, learned counsel for the caveators/respondents has submitted that tenant can be granted six months time for the purpose of vacating the demised premises. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I find it appropriate to grant nine months time to the petitioner to vacate the demised premise. Petitioner is directed to handover the vacant possession to the landlord on or before 05.02.2012 subject to filing of an undertaking to the Rent Controller within a month from today and also clearing all the arrears of rent, if any due. The petitioner shall also keep on paying the rent of the ensuing months. It is made clear that in case of any violation of the undertaking, the petitioner shall be liable under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MAY 06, 2011 JUDGE Vivek