IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 757 of 2007 (Dr. Sunita Shriniwas Hirlekar .vs. The Chairman, Jupiter Ayurvedik College, Nagpur & anr.) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, JJ. DATE : November, 19, 2007. Heard Mr. B.M.Kharkate, Adv. for the Petitioner, Mr.R.S.Parsodkar, Adv. for the Respondent No.1 and Mrs. Khade, Adv. for the Respondent No.2. In the present Writ Petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to supply to him documents mentioned in the prayer clause (1) of the petition. Mr. Parsodkar, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 states that out of the documents mentioned in prayer clause (1) of the petition, the respondent no.1 has supplied some documents i.e. Service Book, Experience Certificate for whole tenure and Salary Certificate/Slip. It is contended that these are the only documents which were in the possession of the respondent no.1 and those are already supplied to the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the respondent nos. 1 and 2 may be asked to supply copies of documents other than those mentioned in prayer clause (1) and supplied by the respondent no.1 and if those documents are in their custody. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, the Writ Petition is disposed of. We expect the respondent nos. 1 and 2 to supply the documents other than those already supplied to the petitioner by the respondent no.1 provided those documents are in the custody of either respondent no.1 or 2 and there is no other legal impediment in doing so. JUDGE JUDGE ssj