IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1338 of 2009 1. PAPPU KUMAR @ PAPPU YADAV 2. BANCHUR CHAUDHARY @ SHARWAN CHAUDHARY BOTH RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE PACHAMBA, P.S. MUFFASIL, DISTRICT GAYA ----------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 1.9.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners have been shown member of mob, having Lathi in their possession. Taking the similar allegation several co-accused, Uday Choudhary, Suresh Choudhary, Binda Choudhary, Bijay Choudhary and Umesh Choudhary of Cr.Misc.No. 15553 of 2009 and Sringar Singh @ Singar Singh of Cr.Misc.No. 17404 of 2009 have been allowed bail by different Benches of this Court, even then petitioners’ prayer for bail has been refused by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as by the Sessions Judge which in my view also is not proper. Thus the petitioners are entitled for the relief sought on their behalf for bail. Accordingly, this revision application is allowed and the judgment and order dated 2.5.2009 passed in Cr.Appeal no. 59 of 2009 by - 2 - Sessions Judge, Gaya affirming the order dated 27.2.2008 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Magadh Division, Gaya in G.R.NO. 2930/08/JUV.915(G)08 (Moffasil P.S.case no. 232/08) is set aside. Let the above named two petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Magadh Division, Gaya in G.R.No. 2930/08/JUV. 915(G)08 (Moffasil P.S.Case no. 232/08). It is made clear that one of the bailers shall be own relative of the petitioners who will undertake to keep the petitioners under his observation and shall produce them whenever is ordered by the Juvenile Justice Board. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI