F.A.O.NO. 1083 OF 2009(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH F.A.O.NO. 1083 OF 2009(O&M) Date of decision:30th August, 2010 Smt. Shashi Bala and others .......Appellants Versus Victor alias Ballu and others ........Respondents BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr. J.S.Saneta, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?Yes/No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No K.Kannan, J.(Oral) The only issue in the appeal is as regards the deduction allowed in the case where there were four dependants or more. The Tribunal had provided for 1/3rd deduction and the plea made is that the deduction must have been 1/4th . Both sides agree that if 1/4th deduction were to be provided for the amount of compensation that would have become payable was Rs. 4,65,000/- and not Rs. 4,11,000/- as determined by the Tribunal. Having regard to the limited scope of appeal, the case is disposed of with a modification that instead of Rs. 4,11,000/- F.A.O.NO. 1083 OF 2009(O&M) 2 as awarded by the Tribunal there shall be awarded Rs. 4,65,000/-. The distribution of the sum shall be in the same proportion and in the same manner as provided by the Tribunal and other directions including the interest contained in the award shall continue. The appeal is disposed of as such. [K.KANNAN] JUDGE 30th August, 2010 Shivani Kaushik