IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.20347 of 2010 Nirmal Kanta Khurana Vs. State of Haryana & another Present: Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The claim of the petitioner is that her late husband was entitled to pay at par with his juniors. It is further averred that some of the persons, who were junior to the late husband of the petitioner, have been granted this pay scale at par with some juniors, who were drawing more pay. For the same cause, the petitioner had filed representations (Annexures P-2 and P-3), which are still pending. Without going into the merits of the claim, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representations filed by the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. November 16, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE