1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.675 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.865 OF 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.675 OF 2010 Laxman Singh Uday Singh Parmar .... Appellant Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay .... Respondent WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.676 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.866 OF 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.676 OF 2010 Ramji Shivachal Sharma .... Appellant Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay .... Respondent APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.681 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.871 OF 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.681 OF 2010 Ramcharan R.K. Yadav .... Appellant Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay .... Respondent 2 AND APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.683 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.873 OF 2010 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.683 OF 2010 Smt. Urmiladevi R. Sharma .... Appellant Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay .... Respondent Shri R.R. Tiwari for the Appellant. Ms K.K. Soraan for the Respondent. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: JULY 06, 2010 P.C: 1. These appeals are directed against the orders passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court refusing to grant ad-interim relief to the appellant. These orders were passed on 7-4-2010 whereby the learned Judge observed that the assessments on which the plaintiff rely, according to the Corporation, did not pertain to the premises in question. Obviously this is a matter which has to be gone into after reply of the Corporation is filed and the parties are heard. There is no error on the part of the learned Judge in refusing the ad- 3 interim relief. 2. Reliance by the learned counsel for the appellant on a judgment of this Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Bhagwan Sakharam Salaskar, reported in AIR 1974 Bombay 272 is misplaced. There can be no doubt that Court can grant ad-interim or ex parte interlocutory injunction, but it does not mean that Court must grant ad-interim relief while entertaining a notice of motion. 3. In view of this, all the appeals are disposed of. The learned Judge would endeavour to dispose of the notices of motion as early as possible and preferably within 15 days. The learned counsel for the appellant states that the matters are fixed on 11-8-2010. On that day the learned Judge shall hear the matters and decide the same. The Corporation to file its reply before that date. If the Corporation does not file the reply, the Corporation suffers. 4. In view of disposal of the appeals, the civil applications taken out in the respective appeals also stand disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)