1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1598 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO.1598 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO.1598 OF 2004 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.954 OF 2004 FROM ORDER NO.954 OF 2004 FROM ORDER NO.954 OF 2004 S.R.V.Medical Devices Pvt.Ltd. & Ors. ...Applicants Vs. Shantaram Gopal Kanade & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.Tulzapurkar i/b Crawford Bayley for the Applicants. Mr.Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for Respondent No.1 CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: JANUARY 11, 2005. JANUARY 11, 2005. JANUARY 11, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Rule. The learned Counsel for Respondent No.1 waives service. Shri Tulzapurkar, learned Counsel for the Applicants states that Respondent Nos.2 and 3 have been served with the notice. 2. This application is for condonation of delay of 59 days in preferring the Appeal. The application is strongly opposed by the learned Counsel for Respondent No.1. 3. After having perused the application and after hearing the parties, I am satisfied that sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Accordingly, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). 4. Place the Appeal for admission on Tuesday i.e. 18th January 2005. Judge. Judge. Judge.