THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR DATED: 26-05-2010 WRIT PETITION No. 11817 OF 2010 Between: Union of India, rep., by the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Central Board of Direct Taxes, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001 and two others ..... PETITIONERS AND L.V. Prasad. G and another .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 11817 OF 2010 ORDER: (per Sri B. Seshasayana Reddy, J) This writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 19-05-2010 passed in M.A No. 267 of 2010 in O.A No. 270 of 2010 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. Heard Sri S.R. Ashok, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners and perused the material brought on record. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the order passed by the Tribunal is ex-facie illegal and, therefore, it is liable to be set aside. As seen from the order impugned in the writ petition, the OA itself stands posted to 01-06-2010 for final hearing. The relevant portion of the impugned order reads as hereunder: “Learned counsel for the applicant filed rejoinder to the main reply and also the additional reply after serving a copy on the other side counsel. Thus, the matter has ripe up for final hearing. When the matter has ripe up for final hearing, when the learned counsel for the applicant it not agreeing for modification of the interim order stating that his claim is not restricting to one sensitive post for the applicant and in such circumstances instead of hearing the MA, both side advocates are directed to get ready for hearing of the main OA immediately after re-opening of the Court. Learned Counsel for the respondents also relied upon the interim order of this Tribunal in OA.410/2010 dated 27.04.2010 reserving one post to the applicants therein and as such he sought similar relief is to be granted in this OA. Admittedly in OA.410/2010 pleadings have not at all complete, whereas in the instant case the matter has ripe up for final hearing and as such taking up the MA at this stage is not desirable and as such the extension of similar relief in OA.410/2010 dated 27.04.2010 is not at all applicable at the stage. Call on 01.06.2010 for final hearing without any further adjournment. Interim order is extended till then.” Since the main OA itself is coming up for final hearing on 01-06- 2010, we deem it not appropriate to entertain the writ petition. We hope and trust that the Tribunal will take up the matter on 01-06-2010 for final hearing. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed at the admission stage. B. SESHASAYANA REDDY, J B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J 26-05-2010 ks