IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. M-27249 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.11.2011. Savitri Devi & others ….Petitioners Versus State of Haryana …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Received by order. Mr. Satyavir Singh Yadav, DAG, Haryana. NAWAB SINGH, J (ORAL) A complaint made by Savitri wife of Ram Swarup and others, residents of Subhash Nagar, Jind before Hon’ble the Chief Justice was received by post and was ordered to be listed on judicial side. 2. The complainants have alleged that Police Officials of Police Post Civil Lines, Jind entered their house at midnight (the date of occur- rence is not mentioned) and gave beatings to their minor children and other family members. 3. Notice of the complaint was directed to the State. 4. State has filed reply stating that enquiry was conducted by Om Singh, Deputy Superintendent of Police (Headquarter) Jind and the complaint was found to be false. Not only that, son of the petitioner is in- volved in more than seven heinous criminal cases and FIRs registered against him are as under: - 1. “FIR No.290 dated 29.5.2007 under Section 61 of the Excise Act, Police Station City Jind, 2. FIR No.637 dated 29.11.2007 under Sections 384 and 387 IPC, Police Station City Jind. 3. FIR No.646 dated 6.12.2007 under Sections 399 and 402 IPC, Police Station City, Jind. 4. FIR No.649 dated 6.12.2007 under Sections 356 and 379 IPC, Police Station City, Jind. 5. FIR No.20 dated 7.1.2010 under Sections 392 and 394 IPC, Po- lice Station City, Jind. Criminal Misc. No. M-27249 of 2011 -2- 6. FIR No.222 dated 28.3.2010 under Sections 201 & 302 IPC, Po- lice Station City, Jind. 7. FIR No.472 dated 19.7.2011 under Section 379 IPC, Police Sta- tion City, Jind. 5. Learned State counsel has stated that the present complaint was filed by the petitioners to make a defence in favour of her son, who is facing trial in the above noted heinous case. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no direction is required to be issued. 7. Disposed of accordingly. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 21.11.2011 Ishwar