IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40652 of 2009 Ramakant Singh son of late Basudeo Singh R/o Village Rajwahi, P.S. Yadavpur, Dist. Gopalganj ………..Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar Ramji Prasad Gupta son of late Indrasan Prasad Byashjee Prasad Gupta @ Byash Prasad Gupta Son of late Indrasan Prasad both are R/o village Hariharpur, P.S. Yadavpur, Dist. Gopalganj…O.Ps. -------------------- For the petitioner: Mr. Harendra Pd. Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Matbloob Rab, A.P.P. ----------- 3 08.12.2011 The informant petitioner has preferred this application under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code against the order dated 21.11.2008 passed by the learned S.D.J.M, in Gopalganj (Yadavpur) P.S. Case No. 381 of 2000, Trial No. 3455 of 2008 by which bail has been granted to the petitioner O.P. nos. 2 and 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after grant of bail the petitioner has moved the learned Sessions Judge for cancellation of bail vide Case No. Cr. Misc. No. 147 of 2008 which has also been rejected. Thereafter the accused have become emboldened and they are tampering with the evidence and they are tampering the witnesses. Learned counsel for the State submits that bail was granted to O.P. no.2 and 3 vide order dated 21 November 2008 more than three years have passed. If the petitioner has grievance, he may move the learned trial court. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State and on perusal of the impugned order passed by the 2 learned S.D.J.M, as well as of the learned Sessions Judge, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The petitioner is at liberty to raise his grievance before the trial court. This petition stands disposed of. M.Rahman (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J)