IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 20TH DECEMBER 2011 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 34049 of 2011(E) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER/ WRIT PETITIONER ------------------------------------------------ SRUTHI.A. D/O. RAMESHBABU.T.G., 'SHACK', SREEKRISHNA APARTMENTS, C.N. PURAM.P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678005. BY ADV. SRI.KRISHNA PRASAD. S RESPONDENTS ---------------------- 1. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATINS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENZHIPALAM, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O., PIN-673635. 2. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENHIPALAM CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O., PIN-673635. BY ADV. SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC FOR UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: dlk WP(C).No. 34049 of 2011(E) -------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXT.P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE MARK CARD ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BEARING REGISTRATION NO. 293881 DATED 4-6-2008. EXT.P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BEARING REGISTER NO. 6194294 DATED 12-5-2010. EXT.P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE MARK SHEET OF THE PETITIONER BEARING REGISTER NO. NSAKECSO57 WHICH IS UNDATED. EXT.P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE MARK SHEET OF THE PETITIONER FOR THE INTERNAL EXAMINATION BEARING REGISTER NO. NSAKECSO57 WHICH IS UNDATED. EXT.P5 A TRUE COPY OF REVALUATION APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 12-12-2011. EXT.P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE CHALLAN RECEIPT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DATED 12-12-2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. dlk ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 34049 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner, submits that she appeared for B.Tech 1 and 2 regular and part time examination and failed in two papers. She submitted Ext. P2 application for revaluation and filed this writ petition seeking an order for expeditious revaluation and declaration of her results. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within eight weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the respondents for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Kp/-