IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 11TH OCTOBER 2011 / 19TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 14662 of 2010(G) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------- ANOOP K.A.AGED 30(THIRTY)YEARS, S/O.ABDUL REHMAN,PROPRIETOR, M/S.KUNNATHUNAD AGENCIS,V.P VII/8J & BK,P.P.ROAD,VENGOLA P.O., PERUMBAVOOR,KUNNATHUNAD TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.B.JAYASANKAR SRI.K.SREESAKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PERUMBAVOOR. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, STATION HOUSE OFFICER,PERUMBAVOOR POLICE STATION, PERUMBAVOOR. 4. ALPHIN, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.KUNJU MUHAMMED, MANOOPARAMBIL HOUSE, VENGOLA PERUMBAVOOR. 5. SHAJI,AGED 38,S/O.KITTU,KOLLAMAVAKUDI, VENGOLA,PERUMBAVOOR, R1 TO R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS R4 & R5 BY ADVS. SRI.C.S.AJITH PRAKASH SRI.T.D.SALIM SRI.PAUL C THOMAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/10/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JJJ WP(C).No. 14662 of 2010(G) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.3.2010 IN WPC NO:6439/2010 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT P2: COPY OF THE FIR NO:348 DATED 7.4.10 OF PERUMBAVOOR POLICE STATION P3: COPY OF THE PRIVATE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PERUMBAVOOR P4: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 1.5.2010 FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT P5: COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO:313467 DATED 1.5.2010 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT EVIDENCING RECEIPT OF EXHIBIT P4 COMPLAINT RESPONDANTS'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE JJJ PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.14662 OF 2010 ------------------------ Dated this the 11th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. The petitioner in this writ petition under Article 226 seeks protection for his life and 'property'. This court considering the averments in the writ petition and the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner on 11/5/2010, issued an interim order directing the 3rd respondent to give adequate protection to the life of the petitioner. The above order is even now in currency. 2. Respondents 4 and 5 on entering appearance have filed a detailed counter affidavit. The issue seriously raised in the counter affidavit is that those respondents have registered workers who were entitled to be engaged in the area where the petitioner conducts business and that the three workers presently engaged by the petitioner got registration not on the basis of any due enquiries held. 3. According to us, the question as to whether the workers WPC.No.14662/2010 2 engaged by the petitioner got registered in accordance with law and the further question as to whether the scheme is implemented in the area in question need not be considered in this writ petition where direction is sought only in respect of the life of the petitioner. We leave other questions raised by the party respondents through their counter affidavit open to be decided in other cases (if not already decided). We confirm the interim order dated 11/5/2010 and dispose of this writ petition. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE. dpk