IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.8690 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 17, 2011. Manmohan Singh and others .....Petitioners versus The State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.M.S.Lobana, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.J.S.Puri, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.J.S.Puri, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners who are working in the Department of Horticulture, Government of Punjab, as Inspectors, seek a mandamus to grant them the revised pay scales w.e.f. 1.1.1986 instead of 1.1.1991 with arrears and all the consequential benefits in view of the Government orders dated 9.7.2008 issued on 10.7.2008 (Annexure P-3/A). CWP No.8690 of 2011 [2] During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by a decision dated 2.5.2010 rendered by this Court in a CWP No.13615 of 2009 (Dr.Yadvinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another) (Annexure P-4). The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the afore-stated decision of this Court in Dr.Yadvinder Singh's case (supra). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 17, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE