I...No.14 ofl¢/ 2003 pr RTJP " IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM ORDER SHEET CRIMINAI.REVISION P. `,_ . . _4idf~ ^^^- S,N. STATE OF SIICKIM Versus Petitioner/Appellant Respondent Serial No. of Order 23.6.20 Order witb Signature Present : Mr. A. K. Upadhyaya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N. 8. Khatiwada, Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr. J.B. Pradhan, Addl.Public Prosecutor for the State. Heard Mr. A. K. Upadhyaya, leaned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N. 8. Khatiwada, learned Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr. J. 8. Pradhan, Addl.Public Prosecutor for the State. This Cout requires the case diary for just determination of the real points and controversy between the parties, for which the learned Public Prosecutor shall produce it before this Court and the matter is fixed day-after- tomorrow, i.e. on 25th June, 2003 for necessary order. N,rdow IE,I (N.S Actin manisfiETh) ief Justice 23.06.2003 *. Gvi . ,.p, .I. EL= Order with Signature a, Present : Mr. A. K. Upadhyaya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N. 8. Khatiwada, Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr. J.B. Pradhan, Addl.Public Prosecutor for the State. Heard Mr. A. K. Upadhyaya, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N. 8. Khatiwada, learned Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr. J. 8. Pradhan, Addl.Public Prosecutor for the State. The learned Public Prosecutor has produced the related case diary. I have perused it. Upon hearing Mr. A. K. Upadhyaya, learned Counsel at some length, Mr. Upadhyaya in his usual frankness submitted that he desires to withdraw this petition. In view of it, the case is closed on withdrawal. The case diary is returned to the learned Public Prosecutor. C.M.A.No.23#003. In view of the order passed today in Criminal Revision No.14/2003, this misc.application is closed and accordingly it is disposed of. 1=-.-.-_ 25.06.2003 Office -#e as to action (if any) taken on Order