IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2008 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1930 CRP.No. 197 of 2008 ---------------------------- LAR.1357/1988 OF III ADDL.SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM. .................... REVN. PETITIONER/ IST RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------------------------- SMT.MAGGIE ABRAHAM, W/O.JACOB, AGED 47, MATHIRAPPALLY VEEDU, EDAYAKUNNAM SOUTH, CHITTOOR, ERNAKULAM-27, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER A.A. ABRAHAM @ THAMPI, S/O. LATE KUNJAVARA KOCHAVARA, AANJIPARAMBIL, CHELLATH HOUSE, KATHRUKADAVU, COCHIN - 682 017. BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR. RESPONDENTS/APPLICANT AND 2ND RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, INTEGRATED FISHERIES PROJECT, FORE SHORE ROAD, ERNAKULAM. R1. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. R. BINDU. R2. BY ADV. SRI. MOHAN C. MENON. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/03/2008, ALONG WITH C.R.P NO. 209/2008 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.KRISHNAN, J. -------------------------- C.R.P. Nos. 197, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 223,224, 225, 226, 227, 228 & 229 OF 2008 --------------------- Dated this the 25th day of March, 2008 ORDER All these civil revision petitions are preferred against the order of the Land Acquisition court in Sec.144 proceedings. It is submitted that execution first appeals are filed in connected cases. It appears that the proper remedy is to file execution first appeal and not civil revision petitions. Therefore all these civil revision petitions are closed as not maintainable with liberty to the revision petitioners herein to file execution first appeals before this court. 2. In order to enable the revision petitioners to file execution first appeals, the registry is directed to return the copy of the orders produced in these cases. It has also to be stated that these civil revision petitions were preferred under the mistaken impression that it can be filed here and if any delay is occasioned, that may have to be considered sympathetically. The civil revision petitions are disposed of as closed in view of the above discussion. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE vps