••^^^^'•/^:^^ffi;£ K^i IN THE HON'BLB HIGH fcOURt OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR REVIEW PETmON N0.5^3 72010 ^BBi ^^^^: PETITIONER ltt?^-/ RESPONDENT *^".^e--" Q»V*--"' VBRSUS Benudhar Pradhan, S/o Late Shri Mohanlal Pradhan, aged about £6years, resident of "Saryeshwari Sadan" B-130, Rajkishore Nagar, Phase II, Bilaspur [C.G.] The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary General Administration Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur District Raipur[C.G.] REVIEW PETITION UNDER RULE 140 F91 OF THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH RULES2007 HIQMCOuRT OFCHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR DiVlSIONBENCH: HON'BLE MR. I.WI.QUDDUSI & HON'BLE MR. PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, JJ. REVIEW PETiTIOM N0.53/2010 (Reyjew Retition under Rule 140 (9)ofthe Hiah Court of Chhattisciarh Rules, PETiTIONER Vs 90071 Benudhar Pradhan- The State of C.G. & others ORAL ORDER (IN CHAMBER) (Passed on 23rd June, 2010) ~i. This review petltion js consldered in Chamber in view of the provisions of sub- ruie (2) of Rule 90 of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007. 2. ilie petiboner seeKs review or the order dated 12.U4.2U1U passed by is Court in W.A. No.58/2010 djsmissing the writ appeal nled against the ora'er dated 18.1.201 U passea' by the ieamed Singie judge in W.u. <s) No.y-sGlM. 3. sne scope ot interrerence in review peSition is weii settled. iiie parameters are pi-escribed jn Order 47 CPC. The petitjoner can pray for review on account of mistake or error apparent on the face of record. Mistake or error apparent signrnes an error which is evident per se rrom the record ot the case and does not require a'etalted examination, scrutiny and elucidation either of the facts or the legai position. if an error is not self-evident and detection thereof requires iong debate and process of reasoning, it cannot be treated as an error apparsnt on the face ofthe record for the purpose ofOrder 47 Rule 1 4. Perused the grounds taken by the petitioner in the pstition for revie-iv. 5. Ths order under review has been passed after eiaborateiy considenng ine • argumeHts advanced by the respective parties and in view of the above settled position of law, no ground tor review is avaiiabie to the petiBoner against the id order. s. The petition is without any substance, the same desen/es to be and is riere&y dismissed. SA'- I.M.Quddusi Judge Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge [ « Ift.fc ^ii'?^'-; Rj 1 K31- .*l —.