6 w%” (5 IN THE HxGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILA§E§§§CHHATTISGARH) w.P.No.”l5 47gggg / FETITIONER : Manohar Jew‘ani Age 35 years /S'on Jetbani of Late R/o Dr. Ganesh wiwal Ram Das Nagar Amardip Talkies Road Raipur (C.G.) Raipur (C. G.) ’1 //’ wRxT PEEITION UNDER ARTIgdEs 22(AND ;2_z__0F THE CONSTITUTION {L OF INDIA FOR TH§_ ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS:‘ CERTIORARI AND/0R 01mm (S), AND/0R DIREcrggms) IN gig NATURE OF WRITS. ,V_,.,1r_.~,_,_._. Q V ‘ VERSUS §§5PONDENTS 3 1) State of. chhattisgarh; ,L‘ w Through— Secretray Health / and family welfare Department ‘ wé' “.W‘w a 1/ DaK.S. Bhawan, Raipur (cpGo) 1w w' _ 2) Nagar Palika Nigam; Through- 11 ..... Commissioner Malviya Road m Respondents WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTWUTION OF INDIA IGH CGURT OF GHHATTISGARH AT BILASPU WRIT PETITION NO 764 OF 2004 Manohar Jethani Versus ’ We Of Chham'égarh & Mame! (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihon’i, J.) Present :- Shri Y.C.Sharma. Advocate for the paitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Pane! Lawyer for the State/respondent No.1. Shri M.L.Sakat, Advocate for the respondent No.2. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 10‘“ day of August. 2010) 1. In the instant petition filed on 20/2/2004, petitioner seeks a difmtion to the respondent Corporation to provide proper facilities by shifting and removing the garbage Ieft in front of his house. What is the present status, it is not known to the petitioner. This is not for the..Court,vin a petition tiled like this, to decide and make direction to the Corporation to implement its functions properly. 2. However, having regard to the time space, if the problem still subsists, the petitioner may make a representation to the respondent authorities for doing the needful. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No omlerasto costs. l l Sd/— l Sau‘sh K. Agnihotri Judge ashok H R