IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2010 / 21ST SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 22591 of 2010(Y) ----------------------------------- -- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- K.C.HAMZA, KARATTUCHALI HOUSE, P.O.OZHUKUR, MORAYUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.PREMNATH (E) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ SECRETARY, R.T.A., MALAPPURAM, PIN-673 592. BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.K.S.MUHAMMED HASHIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ----------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.22591 of 2010 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of August, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner had applied for the grant of a regular permit to conduct services on the route Puthiyodathparamba - Edavannapara - Mukkam (via) Mundumkuzhi, Edavannapara, Keezhuparamba, Kuniyil, Thrikkalayur, Cheruvadi, Kodiyathur, Karasseri and Junction as an ordinary service. The application submitted by the petitioner was considered by the Regional Transport Authority at its meeting held on 24/6/2010 and the regular permit was granted for a period of five years. However, the same has been granted subject to settlement of timings. Pursuant to the grant, evidenced herein by Ext.P1, the petitioner produced the current records of his vehicle and also complied with all the other necessary formalities for the issue of the permit to him. However, the petitioner complains that the timings in respect of his service have not been settled and the permit has not been issued to him till date. 2. Notice in the writ petition has been served on the wpc No.22591/2010 2 respondents. The learned Senior Government Pleader Mr.Muhammed Hashim assures that a timing conference would be held and the timings of the petitioner's service could be settled without further delay. 3. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to settle the timings of the petitioner by convening a timing conference, after considering the proposal submitted by the petitioner and to issue the permit to him, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. K.SURENDRA MOHAN, Judge css/