IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4589 of 2010 MANISH GUPTA sonof Pramod Gupta, resident of village Madhaul, Police Station Maniyari, District Muzaffapur… ..Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ….. OPPOSITE PARTY For the Petitioner Mr. K.N. Diwakar, Advocate For the State: Mr. Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, A.P.P. ----------- 2 22.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner had not been named in the first information report. The petitioner has been made accused on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused and also on the basis of that he was found to have talked to some other accused on mobile phone. It is further submitted that there is no recovery of any incriminating article from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is stated to be in jail custody since 25.11.2008. So far other case is concerned, it has been stated that the petitioner had been granted bail in Maniari Police Station Case No. 29 of 2008 by a Bench of this Court. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of 2 the case, the abovenamed petitioner, Manish Gupta, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri T. Yadav, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Muzaffarpur in Maniari Police Station Case No. 37 of 2008/Tr. No. 3915 of 2009 with further condition that one of the bailors must be one of the parents of the petitioner. Further, if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases, then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)