IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 25TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 3RD ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 23959 of 2004(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ KALLARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.582, KALLARA SOUTH P.O., REP. BY ITS SECRETARY IN CHARGE C.A. MINIMOL. BY ADV. SRI.A.M.SHAFFIQUE SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR SMT.PRIYA MANJOORAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOTTAYAM. 2. KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DY. TAHSILDAR, (R.R.) TALUK OFFICE, VAIKOM. 4. VALSALA KUMAR, PUTHUVALPARAMBI, KALLARA SOUTH P.O. BY ADV. SRI.P.BABU KUMAR ADV. SHRI.NANDAKUMAR, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) No. 23959 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 : COPY OF ORDER DATED 03/06/2003 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P2 : COPY OF MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 03/10/2003. P3 : COPY OF DELAY CONDONATION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER ON 03/10/2003. P4 : COPY OF PETITIONER FOR STAY FILED BY THE PETITIOENR DATED 15/10/2003. P5 : COPY OF PETITION TO RESTORE THE APPEAL DATED 31/10/2004 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P6 : COPY OF OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 21/10/2003 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P7 : COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 23/07/2004 SERVED ON THE PETITIONER ON 03/08/2004. P8 : COPY OF NOTICE DATED 23/07/2004 SERVED on the petitioner ON 03/08/2004. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS R4A : COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY JOINT REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, KOTTAYAM DATED 03/12/2003. ANNEXURE I : COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 26/11/2004. // TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE. jg V.GIRI, J. ----------------------------------- WP(C) No. 23959 of 2004 ------------------------- Dated, this the 25th day of September, 2007 J U D G M E N T When the writ petition came up for orders, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the 4th respondent that the amount which was earlier deposited by the 4th respondent with the petitioner-Society has been returned with appropriate rate of interest. In the circumstances, no further issue survives in the writ petition and the writ petition is dismissed, leaving the contentions of the petitioner open. (V.GIRI, JUDGE.) jg