FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 8220 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 8220 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 8220 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri V.V.Pai for the petitioner Shri P.I.Khemani AGP for Respondents 1 to 3. Shri Vijay Patil for intervenor. CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; A.P.DESHPANDE,J. A.P.DESHPANDE,J. A.P.DESHPANDE,J. DTAED: DTAED: DTAED: 9TH MARCH, 2007 9TH MARCH, 2007 9TH MARCH, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The order impugned in this petition is only a draft/proposed order issued by the authority under section 18(2) of the Co-operative Societies Act. The present petitioner, under the scheme of section 18 can put forth the objections, and the authority is obliged to consider the same and pass the final order. As the proposed order is challenged the petition is pre-mature. Hence it is summarily dismissed. 2. Needless to mention that it shall be open for the petitioner to raise all possible objections to the proposed order before the authority concerned. 2. The learned counsel for he petitioner at this stage expresses apprehension that the authority may not grant hearing to the petitioner before passing the final order. The Dy. Registrar-respondent no.1 is present in the court and he fairly states that before passing final order he would hear the petitioner. 3. In the result, the writ petition is dismissed. C.A. for intervention is allowed. ...