IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11562 of 2008 KARN KUMAR SINGH, S/O Shri Pancha Nand Singh, resident of village and Post Madrauni, P.s. Gopalpur, District- Bhagalpur ……. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur 3.The District Superintendent of Education, Bhagalpur 4.The Block Development Officer Rangra Chauk, District- Bhagalpur 5.The Block Education Extension Officer, Block Rangra Chauk, District- Bhagalpur 6.The Region Education Officer, Navgachiya, Bhagalpur 7.The Head Master, Primary School, Madrauni, District- Bhagalpur 8.The Headmaster, Rajkiye Madhya Vidayalay, Madrauni, Bhagalpur 9.Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Madrauni, Bhagalpur 10.The Gram Panchayat Sewak, Gram Panchayat Raj, Madrauni Block Rangra Chauk, District- Bhagalpur 11.Smt.Sushila Devi, D/O Late Shivnath Singh, Village & Post Madrauni, P.s. Gopalpur, District- Bhagalpur …………… Respondents ----------- 3. 09/09/2010 Learned counsels agree that the Appellate Authorities constituted by the State Government under Rule 18 of the Bihar Panchayat Prarambhik Shikshak (Niyojan Avam Seva Sart) Niyamvali, 2006 (as amended by Amendment Act, 2008) are now functional and hence an efficacious alternative forums is available to the petitioner and others for consideration of all their grievances in respect of their employment. In the circumstances, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner(s) to file an appropriate 2 appeal/application before the concerned Appellate Authority, if not already filed, for redressal of his/her/their grievances. In case such an appeal is filed by the petitioner(s) within one month, the Appellate Authority shall consider the same and all documents enclosed therewith, including orders of this Court in identical matters, if produced, and other relevant records and make all endeavours to dispose of the same on merits in reference to the original records after hearing the parties concerned by a speaking order, preferably within the time prescribed under the Rules for the purpose, by condoning the delay, if any. No order of any authority, passed earlier in terms of Rule 18, as it stood prior to amendment, or any order passed by any authority of the Government at the District level shall be treated as impediment in consideration of the matter judiciously on merits in terms of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner(s). Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)