[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 359 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 359 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 359 OF 2007 Mr. Pravin Patil ..Applicant. V/s State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Smt. Taja Katdare Advocate h/f Miss. Alpa Javeri, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Y.S. Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2007. DATE : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2007. DATE : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2007. P.C. . The applicant, who is an employee of Adhunik Grihanirman Vittiya Corporation Ltd. seeks anticipatory in 4 Crime numbers referred in para 10A of the application. According to him, due to simultaneous request by the depositors for refund of their investment, the company could not meet the demands and therefore, several crimes came to be registered at different police stations. The Managing Director, Directors and many other employees are already granted either bail or anticipatory bail. The present applicant seeks anticipatory bail on executing P.R. bond only in view of the similar directions given by the Division [2] Bench in Criminal Writ Petition No. 399/2006 on 21st March, 2006. To this, learned APP has no objection. The applicant also contends that several other offences are likely to be registered at different places as mentioned in para 10(b) and he seeks 72 hours prior notice before arrest. Mr. Shinde,learned APP makes a statement that in view of the stay granted by the Supreme Court to registration of cases under MPID Act, now no more cases are being registered and therefore, this direction may not be required. 2. In view of the above facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest of applicant in Crime Nos 62/2006 registered at Guhagar, Crime No. 23/2006 registered at Ratnagiri, Crime No. 09/2006 registered at Kudal and 15/2006 at Mahad Police Stations, the applicant shall be released on executing P.R. bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with conditions that he shall make himself available to the police as and when required for the purpose of investigation and shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) (J.H. BHATIA, J.) [3]