IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2010 / 21ST SRAVANA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 4804 of 2010() ------------------------------------------ CRIME NO.405/2005 OF CHATHNNOOR POLICE STATION. ........ PETITIONER/ACCUSED A-3 ------------------------------------------ SANTHOSH S/O. GOPI, CHALIL PUTHEN VEEDU, THAZHAM SOUTH CHERRI, MEENADU VILLAGE, CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.ANIL KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT --------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss V. RAMKUMAR, J. ....................... B.A. No.4804 of 2010 ............................... Dated this the 12th day of August 2010 ORDER Petitioner who is the third accused in Crime No. 405/2005 of Chathannoor Police Station for offences punishable under Sections143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 326 & 308 read with Section 149 of I.P.C seeks his enlargement on bail. The occurrence took place on 17/08/2005. The petitioner was arrested on 19/07/2010. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative conduct of the parties, the nature of the legal injury sustained and the other facts and circumstances of the case, if the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE vdv