IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD SEPTEMBER 2008 / 12TH BHADRA 1930 MFA.No. 795 of 2000() --------------------- OPHMA.28/1996 of ADDL.SUB COURT, ALAPPUZHA .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ----------- VIJAYAKUMAR, KALATHIL, PONNAD P.O., ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1.INDIRA DEVI, D/O. NARAYANAN, MARANTEPARAMBIL, AMBALAPPUZHA P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 2.THAMPI, S/O. NARAYANAN, MARANTEPARAMBIL, AMBALAPPUZHA P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 3.SARASAMMA, D/O. NARAYANAN, MARANTEPARAMBIL, AMBALAPPUZHA P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 4.THANKAMANI, D/O. NARAYANAN, MARANTEPARAMBIL, AMBALAPPUZHA P.O., ALAPPUZHA. 5.HARIDAS, S/O. NARAYANAN, MANIMANDIRAM, KOMANA, AMBALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA (DT.) BY ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKETESH FOR R1 TO 5 THIS MISC. FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER IN C.M.P. NO.4446 OF 2000 IN M.F.A. NO. 795 OF 2000. DISMISSED 3.9.2008 Sd/-(KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) Sd/-(HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE) KURIAN JOSEPH & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ. ---------------------------------------------------------------- M.F.A.NO.795 OF 2000 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of September, 2008 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. This is an appeal filed against the judgment and decree in O.P. (H.M.A.) No.28 of 1996 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Alappuzha. The appellant is the petitioner and the first respondent is the first respondent in that Original Petition. The Original Petition was filed for a declaration that the marriage between the parties is null and void. The suit was decreed and hence the appeal. 2. During the pendency of the appeal, the parties appeared before us. It is seen that the parties have decided to settle the disputes out of Court and accordingly in terms of the ancillary reliefs like return of money, ornaments etc., today the appellant Sri. Vijayakumar has handed over the entire belongings to the first respondent who has duly acknowledged the same. Therefore, nothing survives in this appeal. M.F.A. NO. 795/2000 2 The appeal is closed making it clear that there will be no further claim by the first respondent in respect of the marriage with the appellant. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) (HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE) sp/ M.F.A. NO. 795/2000 3 KURIAN JOSEPH & HAURN-UL-RASHID, JJ. M.F.A.NO. 795/2000 JUDGMENT 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2008