WP(C) 6438/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. E. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. P. Chakraborty, learned SC, Education Department. Considering the nature of the or der I propose to pass, no notice need be issued to the respondent Nos. 4 and 5. According to the petitioner, he has been serving in the school called Ar zod Ali Memorial M.E. Madrassa, Hailakandi from 03.04.2007 on the basis of the a ppointment order issued by the Managing Committee of the school. However, in the same paragraph in the writ petition, his date of appointment is shown as 03.04. 2011. Thus, his date of appointment is not known. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has been deprived of financia l assistant as has been provided by the Govt. as per the policy decision. In thi s connection, he made Annexure-5 representation dated 14.07.2011 addressed to th e Deputy Commissioner, Hailakandi. The writ petition is disposed of providing that the Deputy Commissioner may dispose of the said representation taking note all the attending facts and c ircumstances and in accordance with law. It is made clear that no adverse orders shall be passed against any teacher other than the petitioner without affording the opportunity of being heard.