1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER SB Civil Writ Petition No. 16055/2009 Smt Manju Devi Sharma Vs The State of Rajasthan & ors 24.11.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Amit Singh Shekhawat - for the petitioner Mr Lokesh Atrey – for resp No.6 & 8 Mr KN Gupta – for resp No.3 and 4 Mr Jaideep Singh for Mr Akhil Simlote – for resp No.2 BY THE COURT: With the consent of learned counsel for parties, matter has been heard finally at the stage when matter is listed on two applications. The main ground to challenge action of the State authorities is in regard to grant of permission to erect mobile towers etc. This court passed interim order on 17.12.2009 which is reproduced hereasunder - “Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Issue notice to the respondents. In the meanwhile, status quo as exists 2 today shall be maintained. It is made clear that respondents will be at liberty to grant a fresh permission to the respondent No.6 after any decision taken by the State Government for the said purpose.” All the learned counsel appearing for respective parties state that now the Government has framed policy and, accordingly, erection of mobile tower has to be governed by the said policy. Looking to the aforesaid and with the agreement of learned counsel for parties, respondent-Municipal Council, Sikar is directed to look into the matter and if erection of mobile tower is permissible under the policy then it may be permitted otherwise not. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition is disposed of so as two applications. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma