G) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATXBILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION(S)No a §% */2o11 VERSUS/#1 RESONDENTS . ‘ / Rajuram Yadav ,_ S/o. - :Bhuna‘urarn Yadav aged about 46 “years,‘ _R/o.- Village Khands-aral P'O ‘ Khandsara Tahsul Bemetara District Durg . (C_G)_f :K‘eoha‘ri Iial S/o. SUgandas 'Kaushal aged about 45 years Vill’age‘ Hemabandh » P.O. Khandsara, VTahSIl Bemetara,‘, Districf Dujrg (co) .‘Ba‘éan‘t Kumaf. Joshi 'S/o. ’Sukaluram aged about (45 years Vlllage Patharra P.O. :_ "/Jevra, TahSIIVBemetara, District Durg (c.G.) ' State of Chhatti/Sgarh‘, through Secreta ry, Education ‘Depairtm‘eh‘txMinstry), D.K{s.f ' ‘ Bha-wa'n, ,G.E. Road; Raipur', (CG) . 'Deputy Director ' of 'Publicr $ ‘ Instruction Educatuon Departmentr'YPost Offlce *— Pension Bada ArVInd Nagar ‘ Ward Ralpur (C G) v€%24 PETITIONERS -/1._ P ¥ @ E 226‘QFjn-i ‘L E ; 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I'TISGARH AT BILASPUR I WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 2458 0f2011 ‘PETH‘IONERS Rajuram Yadav & Others. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh & Another. RESPONDENTS RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF T INDIA ; I 3 SB: Hen’ble Shri'Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Prwnt: Shri Alok Nigam, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) ‘ (Passed on 09m day of May, 2011) Learned counsel \appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition. f 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no obj ection. ‘ 3. . Itis ordered accordingly. Consequently, the 'writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/ Satish K. Agnihotri W e @f‘ v I ,