IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4687 of 2006 BRAHMANAND RAYSON OF LATE JAGESHWAR RAY RESIDENT OF JANKINAGAR, DISTRICT PURNEA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROGUH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR WELFARE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, PURNEA. 5. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, BARHARA KOTHI, PURNEA 6. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PURNEA. ----------- 2 29/10/2010 Even according to the assertion made in the writ application work was not being taken from the petitioner from the year 1994 even on daily wage basis. Why the petitioner chose to approach this Court in the year 2006 is not duly explained. A delayed application of the kind cannot be entertained or given indulgence to. Even otherwise the claim or right of the petitioner for appointment or regularization on the basis of having worked as daily wager is not tenable in view of some of the recent decisions including the Constitution Bench judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. There is no merit in this writ application. It is - 2 - dismissed even otherwise besides on the ground of laches and delay. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)