IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 26TH JULY 2010 / 4TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 8911 of 2010(L) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M/S.GEO FOUNDATIONS AND STRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED 6TH FLOOR, ALPHA PLAZA, VALLON ROAD, KADAVANTHARA, KOCHI-682 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, PRAPHULLA KUMAR. BY ADV. SRI.K.L.VARGHESE, SENIOR ADVOCATE SMT.SANTHA VARGHESE SRI.LIJU.V.STEPHEN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, JALA BHAVAN, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (JICA PROJECT), KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 033. 3. THE TEAM LEADER, M/S.TEC CONSORTIUM, CORDIAL CENTRE, KANJIRAMPARA, MARUTHANKUZHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.BABU VARGHESE, SC, KWA FOR R1-2 SRI.M.C.CHERIAN FOR R3 SRI.M.A.THOMAS KUTTY FOR R3 SMT.SARAMMA CHERIAN FOR R3 SMT.ASHA CHERIAN FOR R3 SRI.P.M.SANEER FOR R3 SRI. M. DINESH, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/07/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W.P(C) No. 8911 of 2010 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 26th day of July, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed a memo to the following effect: “1. I am the counsel appearing for the petitioner in the above case and I am conversant with the facts of the case. 2. The above writ petition was filed seeking for direction to the 2nd respondent to make immediate payment of the bill amounts due. After ordering notice, the parties have come to a compromise for settlement of dues out of court. Accordingly, the bill amount as agreed has already been released and Security Deposit has been agreed to be released on withdrawing the writ petition. 3. In the circumstances, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to grant leave for withdrawing the writ petition without prejudice to petitioner's right, if any, to move the court again, if needed.” 2. I have heard both sides. The writ petition is allowed as withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek remedies in respect of security deposit, if not paid. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [TRUE COPY] P.S TO JUDGE.