:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2996 OF 2003 IN SUIT NO. 3608 OF 1994 Ketan B. Parikh and anr. ...Plaintiffs. vs. The Federal Bank Ltd ...Defendants. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2997 OF 2003 IN SUIT NO. 3607 OF 1994 Hiten B. Parikh and anr. ...Plaintiffs. vs. The Federal Bank Ltd ...Defendants. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2998 OF 2003 IN SUIT NO. 3609 OF 1994 Saryu J. Parikh and anr. ...Plaintiffs. vs. The Federal Bank Ltd ...Defendants. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2995 OF 2003 IN SUIT NO. 3606 OF 1994 :2: :2: :2: Jitendra Chimanlal Parikh &anr. ...Plaintiffs. vs. The Federal Bank Ltd ...Defendants. S.H. Jagtiani i/by. Desai and Diwanji for the plaintiffs. for the plaintiffs. for the plaintiffs. None for the defendants None for the defendants None for the defendants CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2006. DATE : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2006. DATE : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. The present four motions are for setting aside the ex-parte decree dated 8.9.2003. The ground taken is that the name of the advocate was not shown on board. However today also none appears in support of the motion for setting aside the ex-parte decree. Todays board shows the name of the advocate for the defendant. :3: :3: :3: Inspite of the name being shown he is not present to argue the present notice of Motion. It indicates that the defendants are not diligent in prosecuting the suit. Thus all motions are dismissed for default. No order as to costs. *********