IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1727 of 2007 Decided on: 9.5.2011 DAV Managing Committee and another …Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. . None for respondents No. 3 and 4. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : It is not in dispute that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No. 1819/2008, decided on 6.6.2008, whereby the letter dated 6.8.2002 was struck down. It is also not in dispute that the Letters Patent Appeals No. 17, 23, 4 and 5 of 2009 were also preferred against the above said judgment. The LPAs have been dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court on 7.7.2010. 2. Consequently, the writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to release the grant-in-aid in terms of Himachal Pradesh Non-Government Affiliated Colleges Grant-in-Aid Rules, 1994, if not released, within a period of two months from today and the fixation of pay and grant of grades shall also be approved, as 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- ordered by the Division Bench of this Court while dismissing the LPA on 7.7.2010. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge May 9, 2011 (K. Attri)