‘ _, z!/° .\ MM- APpLIC‘ATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE § TRIBUNAL \CT l 98 5 X BEFOR’E 'L‘H“ EON'BLE D'L‘ATV N) T. \Tlb ‘IQEH‘IV‘ m CHLTATT%SGA3§ CNAL EVCh AT mlpxm, CHLTATT%SGA3§ Qwrgginal Aggg ication Woo «m Suwit Lam Dewangan, Son of Late Peghnath ”Dewangan, Assistant ‘l‘e chez, Kgea R4 fears, Posted: at Govt. Primary School, HaSSLIa, Block Kasdol, District Rainur (Chhattisgarh) _2_\pg§.icant Versus (1) State of Chha tisgarh; Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantra]. aya , D .K.S .Bhawan , Raipur (C.G.) (2) Directoz, Public Iastructions, C.G. 13ension Bade, Raipur. {3) District «Jducatlon OftLc r, District Raimr (C.G.> ° .IQIBJACLE2LtScntS HI COU FCHHATTIS A i SPUR W.P.(S) No.3773 o€2005 Petitioner Surit Ram Dewangan Versus Respondenke State of Chhattisgarh & others SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice satish K. Agnihotri, J . oRnER ( Passed on this 9’“ day of March, 2007) The following order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. . The petitioner while working as Assistant Teacher in Primary 5chool. Hassua‘ Block - Kasdol. District — Raipur was transferred to Middie Schdol. Raiadeori. on the same terms and conditions vide impugned order dated 6.8.2001 (Annexure N1). . The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Raipur vide interim order dated 12.9.2001 directed to maintain status quo in regard to the position of the petitioner as it was prevailing on 10.9.2001. By virtue of the interim order the petitioner is working at the original place of poating. . Be that as it may. with the passage of time this petition has become infructuous as period of transfer isnot applicable forever. At this point of time there is no question to examine the validity of the transfer order. However, the respondents are at liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in view the public interest and administrative exigency, without insisting on compliance of the impugned transfer order. . lt is well settled principle of law that transfer is an incident of service and it is for the employer to decide as to where a particular officer/employee be posted. keeping in view public interest as well as administrative exigency. This Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interfere only in the case of proved malande, non-competence of authoritypassing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the rules and regulations. . In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. ‘A Sd/- g Satish K. Agnihotri Thakur "i Judge Shri Anupam Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. V. V. S. Murthy, Deputy Advocate General with Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondentsIState.