Arbp338.09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 338 OF 2009 Pravinkumar K. Mehta & Anr. ...Petitioners. Vs. Kamla Laldmare Developers & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. M.M. Vashi i/by M/s. M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Petitioners. Mr. Pranjal Dave for Respondent No.2. Mr. Ryan D’zouza i/by Jose George for Respondent No.1. Ms. Pooja Parekh i/by Shiralkar & Co. for the Applicants. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 12th JANUARY, 2010. P.C.- 1 In Section 9 Petition of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Arbitration Act), the parties have arrived at settlement and accordingly signed the consent terms dated 12/01/2010. It is also counter signed by the respective advocates. It is taken on record and marked 'X'. There is no dispute about the signature, identification and authorization of any kind. The statement is made that the consent terms are well within the frame work of law and the record. 2 There are no other third persons or parties involved and/or will be affected by this consent terms. Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 and Respondent Arbp338.09 2 Nos. 1 and 2 are present in the Court. 3 Respondent No.3 is a son of Respondent No.2. He has no objection of any kind. 4 The parties have accepted the undertaking as per clause 1. It is, therefore, accepted. 5 The Petition is, accordingly, disposed of in view of this consent terms with in order as to costs. 6 Ad-interim relief also stand disposed of. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)