AB 1592/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Ms. A.Bujarbaruah, learned counsel appearing for the accused-petitioners a s well as Mr. K.Munir, learned Addl. P.P.Assam. The case diary has been produced. The accused/petitioner No.2, is the br other of the main accused person i.e. the accused/petitioner No.1 and the accuse d/petitioner No.3 is the wife of the accused/petitioner No.2. In my considered view, these two accused/petitioners are entitled to pre -arrest bail. Accordingly, it is directed that the accused/petitioners, namely, Sri Sanjay Kalita and Smti. Sewali Kalita in the event of their arrest in conne ction with Rangia P.S.Case No. 188/11 U/s 366(A)/341 IPC, they shall be releas ed on bail of Rs. 15,000/- with one local surety each of the like amount to t he satisfaction of the arresting authority. The accused/petitioner No.1, Sri Hitesh Kalita is the main accused/perso n. It is stated that the victim girl is in the custody of the parents of the acc used/petitioner No.1 with intention to give the victim girl in marriage to the accused/petitioner No.1. The learned counsel appearing for the accused/petitioners submits that t here is love affairs between the accused/petitioner No.1 and the victim girl, wh o is now 18 years in age. In view of the above, it is directed that the accused/petitioner No.1, shall appear before the I.O. concerned within a period of 20 days from today. D uring this period of 20 days, the accused/petitioner No.1, Sri. Hitesh Kalita in the event of his arrest in connection with Rangia P.S.Case No. 188/11 U/s 36 6(A)/341 IPC shall be enlarged on bail of Rs. 20,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority in connection wi th the aforesaid case. The bail application is allowed and disposed of