IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14258 of 2009 MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA @ MANOJ KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 5.5.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. For the agency of Tata Indicom, a draft of rupees three lacs was handed over by the complainant but even then he could not be provided agency. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that though he negotiated the company officials for providing the agency and in that continuation it has come that the draft was handed over to the company officials and it is further said that it was deposited in the account of the company. It is the statement of complainant himself so, if any liability can be fixed that upon the company officials and not upon the petitioner, basing which his arrest cannot be justified. I agree with the submission. Accordingly prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or - 2 - surrender within one month from today in Complaint Case No. C-771 of 2007, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI