y Clf/50% 1N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P5No. ‘ ‘ 6C? mow (3.3.) PETITIONER /Smt. Anita Shrivas W/o Shri Rajendra Shrivas, aged about 36 years, R/o Maharshi School Road Mangla, Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhattisgarh , ’/ Through Secretary , Education Department , D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) Director of public Instruction , Pensionbada Raipur (C.G.) Mf WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226OF THE M COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA W] ‘ £1 HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH AT BILASPUR W‘ P. (5) No. 1160 of 200/ Pefifioner : Smt. Anifu atrivas Versus Responden'l's : State of Chha'H'isgurh & moiher Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Jus'rioe Sa‘l'ish K. Agniho'fri. Mr. Kumaresh Tiwar'i, Advcate for the pe‘lifioner. Sm'r Anju Ahuju, Dapu'l'y Govemmenf Advocuw far fh Sfafe/responden‘rs. (Pn‘ed on fs 8*" Dy of February, 2007) Learned counsei appearing for *he pefH’ioner album's fha‘r the pefi'rioner is workin as Asisfmf Teacher. The pefi'rioner obfuined B. E. Excmina‘rion cer'rifice on 20.12.1996, on his own expenses. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the question involved, rein osto whether e teacher wh obtained B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own ewenses is entitled to two advance increments. According to learned counl for the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in View of he deciion of this Cout in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharodwo Vs. uncipal Corporation, Durg and no {2006 (H) MPJR—C6 96}. This Cout in the caee of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, burg and another (Supra), came to th conclusion that th teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. /B.I. Examination Certificte on their own .T a o . e OR D E R sq hi 2 a g s d af he th , o se t s r i Mi ather r e e @ expenses, are covered by fhe circular dafed 24.12.98 issued by fhz Sfafe Governmen'r of Madhya Pmdash. 4. Learned counsel for the pe'rifioner further submiw 1'ho1' fhe facts and question of law involved in The presem case are squarely covered by decision of fhis Court in fhe case of Vashwam' Kumor Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation. burg and another (Supra), +0 which learned counsel appearing for the responden'rs fairly concedes and agrees wi'rh 1he avermen'f made by learned counsel appearing for The pe'l'i'rioner. 5. Accordingly, The writ pefifion is allowedin ferms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 d: 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. ~ l Sd/— l l L w i Satish K.Agnihotri t Judge Subhash l