IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12333 of 2010 Amit Kumar @ Amit Sah, S/o Rajendra Sah, resident of Village- Islampur Bazar, P.S. Islampur, District-Patna. ……Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ……………………….Opposite Party. For the petitioner :- Mr. Daya Shankar Prasad, Advocate. For the State :- Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh-1,A.P.P. ----------- 2. 10. 05. 2010. Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution for offences under Sections 379/511 of the Indian Penal Code, one Bablu @ Rajib Kumar was allegedly found attempting to commit theft of a Maruti Car. However, he was apprehended on the spot. The aforesaid apprehended accused is alleged to have disclosed the name of the petitioner also as his accomplice. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a student having a bright career and he has been named by co- accused only, which has got no evidentiary value. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case by the Police. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and has pointed out that some other criminal cases are also pending against the petitioner. In that view of the matter, prayer for anticipatory bail made on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. He must surrender in the court below in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 62/2009 within a period of four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised, which shall be disposed of on its own merit without being 2 prejudiced by the present order and also by taking into consideration the other materials, which petitioner may bring on record for the purpose of grant of regular bail. m.p. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)