1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICAUTRE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 695 OF 2004 SUMMONS NO. 695 OF 2004 SUMMONS NO. 695 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO. 391 OF 1982 Pankaj Anantrai Bhuva and Ors. ... Plaintiffs Versus M/s. Rajkumar Shivchandray and Sons Pvt. Ltd. ... Defendants Mr. R.M. Tiwari for Plaintiff. Mr. M. Dadhich for Defendants. Mr. S.H. Patel for Applicants. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. : A.M. KHANWILKAR,J. DATED DATED DATED : JUNE 13, 2005 : JUNE 13, 2005 : JUNE 13, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. . It is fairly accepted by the counsel for the applicant that similar prayer made at the instance of another Director has been considered and rejected by the single Judge of this Court . Against that decision, the matter was carried in appeal before the Division Bench. The Apex Court has confirmed that finding. The counsel for the applicant however submits that the matter is being taken up in appeal before the Apex Court and this matter may be adjourned for some time. I see no substance in this submission. However, this application is disposed of with liberty to the applicant to get this application revived after giving notice to the concerned parties, in the 2 event the Supreme Court answers the issue which would support the stand of the applicant herein. Chamber summons disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (A.M. (A.M. (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.) KHANWILKAR,J.) KHANWILKAR,J.)