IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40255 of 2009 1. JAIL SINGH 2. RADHA MOHAN SINGH 3. NAGENDRA SINGH 4. CHENDESHWAR SINGH 5. ANIRUDH KUER 6. DHUP KUER 7. BHULAN KUER 8. DURGA KUER 9. RAJBABU KUER 10.KRISHNAWATI DEVI @ KRISHNAWATI DEVI 11.SMT. DHARAMSHILA KUER 12. MUNCHUN KUER 13. RANI KUMARI 14. PAREKHAN SINGH ----------------PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 18.3.2010 After having heard learned counsel for the parties, by order dated 10.12.2009 petitioner nos.10, 11, 12 and 13 were allowed anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court. For petitioner nos. 1 to 9 and 14, case diary was called for in this case. Heard learned counsel for the parties. I find much substance in the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners that after submission of final form rather recommendation for prosecution under sections 182 and 211 Cr.P.C. writ jurisdiction was approached for proper investigation that was allowed also that should be naturally allowed if fact is suppressed in name of having no 2 knowledge that is matter of consideration of the parties that what action can be taken against the informant but in any case petitioners’ arrest treating the direction of the Court as reinvestigation is not justified. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, petitioner nos. 1 to 9 and 14 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul in Ramgarhwa P.S. Case No. 82 of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)