IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.26259 of 2010 GUDDU SINGH YADAV @ NITESH SINGH YADAV, son of Gaya Nand Singh Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 23.09.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleged that on account of previous anguish, the accused persons namely this petitioner, his father Gayanand Singh and Sintu Singh killed the informant’s son Dheeraj Kumar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no eye witness of the occurrence. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused Gayanand Prasad and Sintu Singh have alreadybeen granted bail. Petitioner is in custody since 27.08.2007. Learned counsel for the informant submits that earlier wife of this petitioner was killed and Dheeraj Kumar stated the aforesaid facts to the in-laws of Guddu Singh and on account of this fact they have killed the deceased. Having regard to the facts of the case and also taking into consideration that petitioner has remained in custody for more than three years, petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five 2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Raniganj P.S. case no. 205 of 2007 (S.T. No. 604 of 2009), with the condition that he will not physically absent for two consecutive dates at stretch, till all the non-official witnesses are examined. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)