IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16931 of 2010 BINOD BHINDWAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 16.07.2010 Petitioner is languishing in jail since 10.12.2009 in a case registered under Section 386 of the I.P.C. It is alleged against the petitioner that he demanded ransom on phone. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he is named in the F.I.R. but from the pleadings made in the petition, it is apparent that the police out of the malice has falsely implicated the petitioner and also issued detention orders earlier which were quashed by the High Court, considering these aspects, petitioner has been granted bail in another case vide Cr. Misc. No. 21563 of 2010. Certified copy of the order has been produced in Court, let it be kept on record. Let the petitioner namely Binod Bhindwar be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Birpur, Supaul in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 60 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. 2 The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on the date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled (v) In view of the antecedents of the petitioner, petitioner is directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Supaul, within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next 9 months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in this period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court 3 concerned. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)