IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 8149 of 2010 Date of Decision: 15.12.2010 Subhash and another .... Petitioners Versus Ram Niwas and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Ram Avtar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that DWs shall be cross-examined on the documents proposed to be filed in additional evidence. He further states that in view of Order 13 Rule 1 (3) CPC, petitioners-plaintiffs are entitled to cross-examine DWs on the documents sought to be filed in additional evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to take all the legal remedies which are available under the law. (ALOK SINGH) 15.12.2010 JUDGE reena