:1: :1: :1: srp. HIGH HIGH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION ST. NO. 11011 OF 2006. IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 7025 OF 1998. PETITION NO. 7025 OF 1998. PETITION NO. 7025 OF 1998. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1115 OF 2007. Sursingh J. Jadhavrao. Petitioner. Versus. Vinay K. Panse & others. ..Respondents. --- Aditya Khandeparkar & Pankaj Sutar i/b M/s. Khaitan & Jaykar for the Petitioners. R. S. Kate for the respondent no.1. V. S. Gokhale AGP for the Respondent -State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & D.G.KARNIK, D.G.KARNIK, D.G.KARNIK, JJ JJ JJ. DATE DATE DATE : JUNE 20, 2007. : JUNE 20, 2007. : JUNE 20, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. Delay is condoned. 2. So far as the review application is concerned, we find that the petitioner’s surplus land has been taken in possession in the year 1973 and thereafter it has been distributed in the year 1973. On the day the possession is taken the land vests in the Government, and the day one the petition is filed or the present review petition is filed there was/is no locus for the petitioner to make a grievance in respect of that. Even we do not find any substantial question of law involved in the review. Review petition is hereby rejected. (D.G.KARNIK,J.) (D.G.KARNIK,J.) (D.G.KARNIK,J.) (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J.) J.) J.)