IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 336 of 2010 Decided on: 20.12.2010 Smt. Shido Begum …Petitioners Versus P. Mitra and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. No For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. None for respondent No. 3. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Mr. P. M. Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General has filed reply on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2 in the Court. The same is permitted to be taken on record. It has come in the reply that in case the petitioner submits a fresh application for demarcation/correction in the revenue record, the same shall be considered within a reasonable period. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for demarcation/correction in the revenue record with all the supporting documents, within a period of three weeks from today. Thereafter, the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No -2- respondents shall carry out demarcation and in consequence thereto necessary corrections shall be carried out in the revenue records. The entire process shall be completed within a period of three months from today. Notices are discharged. No costs. Copy dasti on usual terms. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge December 20, 2010 (K. Attri)