IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.9623 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 05, 2011. Karan Singh .....Petitioner versus Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Gurgaon and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Ashish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner was employed as a Mali-cum-Helper on 1.1.1987 with the respondent-department and his services were allegedly terminated w.e.f. 13.9.1987. Since no compensation was paid to the petitioner, he alleged that it is a case of illegal retrenchment and raised an industrial dispute in the year 2000 which has been answered by the Labour Court Gurgaon against him, holding that it was not a case of retrenchment, rather the petitioner abandoned the job. Such an inference has been drawn on account of the inordinate delay in raising the dispute. There appears to be some substance in the conclusion drawn by the Labour Court as ordinarily the petitioner would not have awaited for such a long period to CWP No.9623 of 2011 [2] agitate his alleged retrenchment. No case to interfere with the impugned order based upoon a simple finding of fact, is called for by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction. Dismissed. August 05, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE