In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 7239 of 2009 (O&M) Sureshpuri Sadiq Chela Baldevpuri and others ... Petitioners vs State of Haryana and others .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Amarjit Markan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, for respondents no. 1 to 4. Dr. Anmol Rattan Singh Sidhu, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nandan Jindal, Advocate, for respondent no. 5. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the orders of the court below rejecting the prayer of the petitioners for interim stay in a suit filed by them. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the only grouse in the present petition is regarding withdrawal of Rs. 19.50 lacs lying deposited in a bank under the control of receiver. His apprehension is that respondent no. 5, who has been appointed as Mahant and whose appointment is under challenge before the civil court in a suit filed by the petitioners, may withdraw the amount and misappropriate the same. He submitted that in case any money is required by respondent no. 5 for any religious purpose, he should take the necessary permission from the court below. Learned counsel for respondent no. 5 submitted that respondent no. 5 does not have any objection to the proposal made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from Roshan Lal, Naib Tehsildar, Narwana, submitted that the amount lying deposited in the bank is Rs. 14.81 lacs and not 19.50 lacs. Considering the aforesaid fair stand of the parties, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that in case respondent no. 5 needs any money for any religious purpose, he will take necessary permission from the court concerned to withdraw the amount lying deposited in the bank. The impugned order passed by the learned court below is modified to the extent mentioned above. 11.3.2010 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge