IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-34733 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: November 17, 2011 Daljeet Singh & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed on the premise that the petitioners, on account of love affair, got married. Respondent Nos.5 to 9, who are the parents/relatives of petitioner No.2, are not accepting the marriage and therefore are threatening the petitioners. 2. Notice of motion. 3. At this stage, Mr. Jashan Jit Singh Uppal, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.5 to 9. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. 4. Respondent No.5, Sahib Singh and respondent No.6, Crl. Misc. No. M-34733 of 2011 [2] Gurmit Kaur, parents of petitioner No.2 are present in Court and have been allowed to talk to their daughter Baljit Kaur. Baljit Kaur (petitioner No.2), however, insists that she wants to go with Daljeet Singh (petitioner No.1), whom she claims to be her husband. 5. In the face of above circumstances, learned counsel for private respondents, on instructions from the private respondents, states that no harm would be caused to the petitioners. 6. In view of the above, no further directions are required to be issued. 7. In case the petitioners feel threatened, they would be at liberty to approach the Inchage of concerned police station, who shall ensure protection of life and liberty of the petitioners. 8. Mr. Jashan Jit Singh Uppal, Advocate, has pointed out that the petitioners have forged and fabricated certain documents and in particular, the signatures of Sahib Singh and Gurmit Singh. 9. If that be so, the said two respondents (Nos.5 and 6) would be at liberty to approach the police authorities to lodge a criminal case. In case commission of cognizable offence is made out, the Court trusts that appropriate action, as required by law, would be initiated. 10. The petition is accordingly disposed of. (AJAI LAMBA) November 17, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?