IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1795 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: September 9, 2009. Sanjeev Kumar ...Petitioner(s) v. Shri Rakesh Aggarwal, IPS ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: None for the petitioner. Shri M.C. Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent. ORDER Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The grievance of the petitioner in this case is that despite directions, SSP, Kapurthala failed to look into the representation dated 23.6.2008 of the petitioner. In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court, reply by way of affidavit of Shri Rakesh Aggarwal, SSP, Kapurthala has been filed wherein it has been submitted that on the representation of the petitioner, an inquiry was marked to the SP (Hq), Kapurthala and thereafter FIR No.152 dated 30.10.2008 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471,120-B IPC was registered at PS Subanpur. It is further submitted in this reply that the accused in the said FIR were to be arrested after investigation. However, later on the DIG, Jalandhar Range vide order dated 5.12.2008 marked the inquiry in the said FIR out of District Kapurthala, i.e., to SSP, Hoshiarpur and to get the same inquired into from the officer of rank of SP and the said inquiry is being conducted by Shri Sushil Kumar, SP(D), Hoshiarpur. In view of the aforesaid submissions made by the respondent, I am of the view that the respondent has not disobeyed the directions passed by this Court. No merit. Dismissed. Rule discharged. September 9, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge