IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2008 / 11TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 19873 of 2008(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- GANGADHARAN, S/O.KRISHNANKUTTY, NADUPPOKKIL HOUSE, ELAMKULAM, KUNNAKAVU P.O., PERINTHALMANNA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.R.KRISHNAKUMAR (CHERTHALA) RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. ELAMKULAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, P.O.KUNNAKAVU, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SECRETARY, ELAMKULAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, P.O.KUNNAKAVU. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, MALAPPURAM. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. RELIANCE TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE LTD A & P ARCADE, SAHODARAN AYYAPPAN ROAD, KADAVANTHARA, KOCHI REP. BY ITS MANAGER. BY SRI.B.H.MANSOOR, SC FOR R1 SRI.V.G.ARUN, SC FOR R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 19873 OF 2008 N ==================== Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2008 J U D G M E N T The case of the petitioner is that by Ext.P2 resolution Panchayat has declined the request of the 5th respondent for a permit to install a tower. According to the petitioner, inspite of Ext.P2, the 5th respondent is proceeding to install a telecommunication tower. First of all, if there is no permit as contended by the petitioner and despite that the 5th respondent is installing such a tower, it is for the petitioner to approach the Civil Court and obtain an order of injunction against the 5th respondent. There is absolutely no extraordinary situation warranting the filing of writ petition and that too against a private party. Apart from that, as at present, it is only based on his apprehension, this writ petition has been filed. Therefore, as at present, I see no justification for entertaining this writ petition. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp