IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2010 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1932 RP.No. 291 of 2010(O) ------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 01.02.2010 IN W.P.(C) NO. 3287 of 2010 REVIEW PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT IN WRIT PETITION:- -------------------------------------------------------------- THANKAMANI AMMA,D/O.SIVARAMA PILLAI, ARUPURAVILAKATHU VEEDU, ARAYALLOOR,T.C.8/1432, THIRUMALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. MR. D.KISHORE RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONERS IN THE WRIT PETITION:- ------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SATHYABHAMA AMMA.K, MOHANA VILASOM, VADAKKUM BHAGOM, KAZHAKUTTOM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SYAMA DEVI,D/O.SATHYABHAMA AMMA, MOHANA VILASOM,VADAKKUM BHAGOM,KAZHAKUTTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. GOPAKUMAR,S/O.SATHYABHAMA AMMA, MOHANA VILASOM,VADAKKUM BHAGOM,KAZHAKKUTTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. SREEKUMAR,S/O.SATHYABHAMA AMMA, MOHANA VILASOM,VADAKKUM BHAGOM,KAZHAKKUTTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR , J. -------------------------------------------------- R.P. No. 291 of 2010 in W.P.(C) No. 3287 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of March, 2010. ORDER Heard both sides. 2. The last sentence in paragraph 3 of the judgment dated 01.02.2010 in the above writ petition which reads “But at the same time prima facie there seems to be some injustice in allotting the entire shares to the plaintiff from one property alone because going by Ext.P1 preliminary decree the plaintiff has only 1/6 share over plaint schedule item Nos. 2 to 4 and 1/12 shares over the plaint schedule item No.1” shall stand deleted. Likewise, direction No.3 in the operative portion of the judgment shall also stand deleted. This revision is disposed of as above. Dated this the 24th day of March, 2010. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv