Versus Respondents 1. HI6HCOURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5487 of 2007 Petitioner Smt. Shyamlata Yadav, W/o Manoj Kumar Yadav, Aged about 26 years, R/o Village Badki Mahari, Block <& P.5.- Balrampur, Tehsil- Pal, Oistt: Sarguja-(C.6.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, bepartment of Panchayat and Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.6.) 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Sar9uja (Ambikapur) Distt.Sarguja-(C.G.) 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Balrampur, Distt : Sarguja-(C.6.) 4. Ku. Sukkanti, D/o Lirkan Sai,R/o Village Badki Mahari (Dumarki), Block <& P.S. Balrampur, Tehsil -Pal, Dist-t-. Sarguja-(C.&.) WRIT PETTTOIN UNbER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTEON OF INblA Sin9le Bench : Hon'bleMr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. ^. Shpi A. N. Pandey, Advocatefor the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy (Sovt. Advocate for the respQndent No.l. None for the resp&ndents No. 2 and 3. Shri Amrito &as, Advocate for the respondent No.4. ORALQRbER (Passed on this 18th day of June, 2008) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 20.7.2007(Annexure P/l), passed by the respondent No.2,whereby the respondent No.4 has been appointed on the post of Gram Rojgar Sahayak in village Panchayat Badki Mahdr'i, Bolrampur District Sarguja (Ambikapur). The application of the petitioner was assaassisa ^•as»ss»" y- Thakur (^) rejected on the ground that the mark sheets submitted by the petitioner were doubtful. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that without verification of the mark sheets the candidature of the petitioner has been rejected, though the petitioner has obtained more marks in Class l2th/Intermediate examination than the respondent No.4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that the competent authority may consider the original certificates/mark-sheets and after examining the same may pass appropriate order, in accordance with law. Learned counsel appedring for the respondents have no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. In view of the above stated submissions, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the concerned authority/respondent No.3 is directed to verify the certificates/mark-sheets produced by the petitioner, on the basis of the original certificates. The concerned authority may also examine whether the certificates/mark-sheets have been issued by the recognized institutions, on the basis of the government circulars/statutory provisions and pass appropriate order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the event it is found that the certificates/mark-sheets obtajned by the petitioner are proper and have been issued by the duly recognized institutions, the petitioner would be entitled to the appropriate relief, as having obtained more marks. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with the above-stated direction.No order asto costs. , ._ Sd/- Sati.sh K.Agailiotri Judge