s s a si '^s .^ ^^•.'..^ i ^ INTHECOURTQFJ^ON'BLEHIGHCOURTOF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR(C.G.) PETITIONER WRIT PETITION N0 ."J.6^..12006 /: Ghasiya S/oLSte Lsite Shri Kariya, Aged about 5j year working as Gangman Department of P.W.D.R/o Gurdihari, Tah. Sarangarh Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) RESPONDENTS .4^%; ^^" '•" x.%' fl..^" ^ ,^y i/y FCSVED-COP'" '.^^i fsi^c 'CLE toA.G.N^SPUB VERSUS : / 1. State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 3. Superintending Engineer, PublicWorks Department, Bilaspur Division, Distt.Bilaspur(C.G.) 4. Executive Engineer, j PublicWorksDepartment, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AWRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. ORANYOTHER DIRECTION OR ORDERTP DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER ¥ M-HC-22 T;q -4Wi<vt<<, aylyis, tci"iwi< 3?reOT 1c?3rq? ..^...l:.^.;.767^'0 0^" 11*101! gR^iat.""""""""" '"""""/'(f^ 200 ••;:-"^^r" 3D^T^iT h-\\'b SII^I wite^rfi^ ^- :8-2-2006 Shri Sameer Behar, counsel foilthe Shri Satish Gupta, Dy, Govt. ACJVO( Application for urgent hearing i; Heard. The petitioner has filed thi^ Constitution of India on the ground th|at his services have notAeen regulari2e4 Annexure P-2 and Circulars AnnexiJ dated 3-9-2002. !t is pointed out thai 'tl^ffl'ill ^ITClf '31ST?t <Fa«K ^;3iS^n3ii*?[ petitioner. )cate for the State. ai.'owed. petition under Articles 226/227 of the even after compieting 25 years of servics, Counsel forthe petitioner subnjits that the petifioner is sen/ing as Gangman since more than 25 years, He has fil^dcopy.of Service Book. He submits thatthe petitioner is entitled to be regularizec( under the Gangmen's Service Rules, 1996 )re P-3 dated 9-4-2003 and Annexure P-4 ( representations as per Annexure P-6 were made CQltectively and the same is pefljding.It is also pointed out that some persons have been reguiarized. Learnecl State counsel pointed petitioner is pendjng and.the same wi! (jsutthatthe representation submitted bythe Ibe considered and decided. Having considered and withoutj case, in the opinion of this Court, for direction is given to the petitioner to his grievahces before the respondentl of the petition and this order, withi representation being fiied, the compeij the same on its own merits in within three months from the date of made clear tbat if any grievance avaiiable under the law. With the aforesaid observationsl Certified copy as per rules. th® expressing any opinion on the merits of the present, ends of justice will be served if a rjiake a detailed representation afresh raising |no. 2 - Engineer-in-Chief along with a copy jn three weeks from today, and on such compei^nt authority of the respondents shall decide accord^ince with law as early as possible .preferably i|eceipt/ production of the representation. tt is the petitioner may avail the remedy, rertiains, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [•qi^^gil