1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. O R D E R Smt. Salma & ors. Versus Ram Niwas & ors. S.B. Civil Misc. Application No.94/2004 in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.96/1996 ... Date of Order: February 02, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.R. PANWAR Mr. Ravi Bhansali, for the applicant-appellants. Mr. L.D. Khatri, for the non-applicant/respondents. BY THE COURT: By an application being IA 141/2006 under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, the applicant-appellants seek to inplead the New India Assurance Company Limited as a party-respondent. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC is allowed and the New India Assurance Company is impleaded as a party respondent. Amended cause title has already been filed, which may be placed at the appropriate place in the file. Mr. L.D. Khatri, appears for the newly added 2 respondent the New India Assurance Company Limited, the service is, therefore, complete. By the instant application under Section 152 read with Section 151 CPC, the applicant-appellants submits that there is an arithmetical error regarding computation of the amount of compensation in the judgment dated 8-4-2003 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.96/1996. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellants submits that while passing the judgment dated 8-4-2003, this Court came to the conclusion that the annual contribution of the deceased towards his dependents was Rs.12,000/- per annum and applied the multiplier of 18 years purchase factor and the amount of total dependency comes to Rs.2,16,000/- , whereas the amount of RS.1,80,000/- has been awarded as compensation as against 18 years dependency and adding to that amount the loss of love and affection to applicant-appellant No.2 to 7 @ Rs.5000/- each, which comes to Rs.30,000/-, the total amount of compensation comes to Rs.2,46,000/- and further adding thereto the loss of consortium of Rs.15,000/- to applicant-appellant No.1 Smt. Salama, the total amount of compensation comes to Rs.2,61,000/-, whereas the total compensation of Rs.2,25,000/- has been awarded by this Court. On careful perusal of the judgment dated 8-4-2003, which is under review, it appears that there is arithmetical 3 mistake so far as awarded the compensation towards loss of dependency of the applicant-appellants for 18 years, i.e. Rs. 12,000 x 18 = 2,16,000/-. In this view of the matter, the review application deserves to be allowed and in the judgment dated 8-4-2003 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.96/1996, in place of total compensation towards lthe dependency @ Rs.12,000/- per annum for 18 years deserves to be substituted by Rs. 2,16,000/- in place of Rs.1,80,000/- and in place of total compensation, the amount of Rs.2,61,000/- in place of Rs.2,25,000/- deserves to be substituted. With these modification, the review petition stands disposed of. (H.R. PANWAR), J. mcs