IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 16278 of 2004 Between: S.Haseena Bee, W/o.Moulali Saheb, R/o.Aluvala Village, Gonagandla Mandal, Kurnool Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Joint Collector, kurnool Dist. 2 The Revenue Divisional officer, Adoni Division, Kurnool Dist. 3 The M.R.O., Gonagandla Mandal, Alavala, Kurnool Dist. 4 K.Venkatramudu, Gonagandla Mandal, Alavala Village, Kurnool Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate writ or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 to 3 in not allotting the essential commodities to the petitioner as highly illegal and arbitrary and consequentially direct the 3rd respondent to supply the essential commodities to the petitioner for a period of 3 months as per the orders of the 2nd respondent forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.T.M.K.CHAITANYA Counsel for Respondents 1 to 3: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES Counsel for Respondent No.4: The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _______________ 07-12-2004 kdl To 1 The Joint Collector, kurnool Dist. 2 The Revenue Divisional officer, Adoni Division, Kurnool Dist. 3 The M.R.O., Gonagandla Mandal, Alavala, Kurnool Dist. 4 Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Civil Supplies, High Court Buildings, A.P., Hyderabad, (OUT). 5 Two C.D. Copies.