1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.7484/2010 Deepak Vs. State Date of order : 4/8/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Anil Upman for the petitioner. Shri Amit Punia, P.P. for the State. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner was not even named in the FIR and that in fact it was a small dispute of accident of vehicle, which has been blown out of proportion when the accused refused to satisfy the demand of the complainant for paying compensation for damage of the vehicle. No person sustained injury. On consideration of this fact, this Court was persuaded to grant bail under Section 439 to co-accused Ram Gopal, Nasrulla and Tasleem, whereas anticipatory bail was granted to co- accused Azad. Petitioner is in jail for last one year. Trial of the case will take long. There is no previous case against the petitioner. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application, but was not in a position to dispute the correctness of the 2 factual contents and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Deepak S/o Devilal shall be released on bail in F.I.R. No.346/2008, P.S. Bhawanimandi, Distt. Jhalawar for offence u/s.147, 307, 427 and 120B of IPC on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/