WP(C) 4600/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A C UPADHYAY Heard Mr. P Talukdar, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P N Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, Assam. The petitioner claims to have been working as an Honorary Teacher since 03.09.2004 in Phutuki Phulbari Missing L.P.School In respect of Honorary Teacher , there, in force, an office memorandum, dated 21.01.2004, where under the State Government has clarified that while making appointment of regular teachers or w hile regularizing the services of Honorary Teachers, the State Government would give them preference in the form of relaxation of age for the purpose of taking the benefit of their experience. The petitioner, therefore, claims that being an Honorary Teacher, he too is covered by the office memorandum, aforesaid. Mr. Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, has pointed out that there is no cause of action for the petitioner to attempt to invoke High Court’s extraordina ry jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Be that as it may, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to t he respondents that as and when selection for appointment of Teachers, on regula r basis, is resorted to by the Government and if the petitioner offers his candi dature for selection and appointment, the petitioner shall be given the benefit of, and be treated to be covered by, the office memorandum, dated 21.01.2004, af orementioned provided that the petitioner is found to be an Honorary Teacher as mentioned in the office memorandum, dated 21.01.2004 and if he is other wise eli gible for such selection and appointment. No costs. Ordered accordingly.