1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Appln. No. 6015 OF 2007 Shrikrushna Tejmal Chandak v. Presiding Officer, Indl. Court & anr. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders Mr.A.P.Tathod Advocate for the Applicants. Mr.Suresh Dhole Advocate for Respondent no.2. .... CORAM: A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 27 th AUGUST, 2007. This application has been filed by the applicants claiming that the amount deposited by the petitioner in this Court is liable to be paid to them. Mr.Tathod, learned counsel, submits that the Secretary of the Union is not ready to receive the said amount. In view of this, Mr.Tathod submits that the five applicants who were entitled to the said amount be allowed to withdraw the same. Mr.Dhole, learned counsel, does not dispute this statement. In view of this, civil application is allowed in 2 terms of prayer clause (i) and (ii). Mr.Tathod further requests that five Demand Drafts in the name of the five applicants to this application are required to be prepared for making over the payment to them and that these applicants would bear the expenses of Demand Draft commission. Civil application disposed of. JUDGE /TA/