+.-.`-., ¥/® Serial No. of Order 73 2003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM ORDER SHEET REGulj\R sBcONIj AprmA|. prmunm rmTI SITA RASAILY ersus Order with Signature .No. 3 of to/ 2003 Petitioner/Ap|)e]lant Respondent Present Mr Anmoleprasad andMr T. B Thapa, Advocates for the appellant. c.M.ADDi.NO.29re003 Heard on the application for condonation of delay Delay is condoned subject to objection R.S.A.No.3#003 Heard on admission. Substantial question put in by the appellant is "Whether the finding that the sale deed dated 261179 marked exhibit PI was sufficiently proved by the plaintiff and whether its admission into evidence in the suit was vitiated due to a misreading and misappreciation of the law relating to the proof and admission into evidence of the same?' After hearing the learned Counsel for the appellant and perusing the judgment 6f the trial court and also of the first appellate court, both of whom have decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff-respondent against the appellant and the other three persons who were impleaded defendant Nos.2 to 4 and, more particularly, paragraph 35 of the judgment of the trial court which mentions that on 16 4.1982 the power of attorney executed in favour of the appellant was presented before the Registrar which was confirmed by the seller that the proposedd Office Note as to action (if any) taken on order ~ ~ +