IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 28TH JUNE 2010 / 7TH ASHADHA 1932 RP.No. 529 of 2010(O) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.35335/2009 Dated 18/03/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): --------------------------------------- 1. R.KRISHNANKUTTY NAIR, S/O.RAMAN NAIR, NELLAMPURATH HOUSE, KUPPADI VILLAGE, NOOLPUZHA POST, SULTHAN BATHERY TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRICT. 2. GIRISH BABU, S/O.R.KRISHNANKUTTY NAIR, NELLAMPURATH HOUSE, KUPPADI VILLAGE, NOOLPUZHA POST, SULTHAN BATHERY TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.C.GOVINDA SWAMY RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- K.G.PADMANABHAN, S/O.GOPALA PILLA, PURAMANA HOUSE, NOOLPUZHA POST, KALLOOR VILLAGE, SULTHAN BATHERY TALUK, WAYANAD. BY ADV. SRI. E.G.GORDEN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P.BHAVADASAN, J. ---------------------------------------------------- RP No.529/10 in WP(C) No.35335/09 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated 28th June 2010 Order When this Review Petition was taken up for hearing on 23.06.2010, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Therefore, an order was dictated in the open court, dismissing the RP. Thereafter, the learned counsel for the petitioners represented before this Court on the very same day that he could not reach the Court in time and the matter may be re-posted to another date. Accordingly, the case was posted today. But, today also, there is no representation either by the petitioners or their counsel. 2. On going through the Review Petition, the relief prayed for, is for a re-hearing of the Writ Petition. It is impermissible in law. The RP is without merits and it is accordingly dismissed. P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sta 2 3