IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 25987 of 1996 Between: B.A.Rama Rao, S/o Subba Rayudu, SKBR College, Amalapuram, E.G.District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 Indian Audit & Accounts Department, Rep by its Accounts & General, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 4 SKBR College, Rep by its Special Officer, Amalapuram, E.G.District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or direction especially one in the nature of Mandamus: i. declare that classification made in G.O.Ms.No.2 Education (CE-III) dt.5.1.94 granting pension to those retired on completion of 60 years as per 1961 A.P.Libralised pension Rules when the persons are continued beyond 58 years are granted 1980 A.P.Revised pension Rules is illegal, arbitrary and unjust: ii. to declare that the petitioner is entitled to be paid the pension and pensionary benefits on the basis of service put in by him and the last pay drawn in the scale of as per 1980 A.P.Revised Pension Rules; iii. declare that the petitioner is entitled to be paid the difference of pay in scale of Rs.3700-5700 from 6.5.88 to 5.5.90 with all the increments; iv. compel the respondents to pay pension to the petitioner on the basis of last pay drawn in the scale of Rs.3700-5700 as per the 1980 A.P.Revised Pension Rules and grant all pensionary benefits; v. compel the respondents to pay the difference of pay in the scale of Rs.3700-5700 from 6.5.88 to 5.5.90 with increments and interest of 18% per annum; vi. to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms.G.Swathi Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER Due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. _________ 17-04-2008 rkk ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 Indian Audit & Accounts Department, Rep by its Accounts & General, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 4 SKBR College, Rep by its Special Officer, Amalapuram, E.G.District. 5. 2CD copies