vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3746 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.3746 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.3746 OF 2008 Mull Hanif Amir ... Petitioner V/s. The Chairman, Gram Vikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.S.V. Pitre for Petitioner Mr.Dilip Bodake for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J MHATRE, J MHATRE, J. DATED: SEPTEMBER 11, 2008 SEPTEMBER 11, 2008 SEPTEMBER 11, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the School Tribunal, Kolhapur region, Kolhapur dismissing his appeal. The contention raised is that the services of the petitioner have been illegally terminated as no cogent reasons were assigned by Respondent Nos.1 and 2 while terminating the services. It is also contended that the Tribunal has erroneously held that the appointment of the petitioner was not valid. The Tribunal has considered all these factors and in my view, has rightly concluded that there is no merit in the case of the petitioner. The Tribunal has found that the appointment order which was produced by the petitioner was not a genuine document and has, therefore, discarded the same. The Tribunal has held : 2 : since there was no valid appointment, the termination of service cannot be faulted. The Tribunal has also considered the fact that in any event, the petitioner had worked merely for 8 months and 4 days and, therefore, the petitioner did not deserve any relief. 2. The petition is rejected as there are no errors of law apparent on the face of the record. The order of the Tribunal is not perverse and, therefore, it is not required to be interfered with under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. Petition rejected.