THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Crl.R.C.No.944 of 2004 Date: 27.01.2011 Between: Nallu Parashu Ramulu … Petitioner AND Nallu Prameela and 4 others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Crl.R.C.No.944 of 2004 ORDER: The petitioner is the husband of the first respondent. The respondents 2 to 4 are their children. When the maintenance granted in favour of the respondents 1 to 4 at Rs.300/- per month per head was enhanced to Rs.1,000/- per month per head, through orders dated 21.05.2004 passed in Crl.M.P.No.5119 of 2002 in M.C.No.3 of 1999 by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Suryapet, the husband laid the present revision impugning the same. While Sri E. Srinivas, learned counsel is representing the husband, there is no representation for the respondents 1 to 4. The award of maintenance at Rs.1,000/- so far as the first respondent-wife is concerned, in view of the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Suryapet, the same deserves to be confirmed. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the respondents 2 to 4 have become majors and the second respondent, in fact, was already married to. He produced copies of the birth certificates of respondents 2 to 4. The respondent No.2 was born on 03.04.1987, respondent No.3 was born on 01.04.1989 and respondent No.4 was born on 31.08.1992 according to the school records. The respondents 2 to 4 thus are majors according to the school records. They definitely are not entitled to maintenance u/s.125 or 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 3. The Criminal Revision Case is allowed so far as the award of maintenance by the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Suryapet against the respondents 2 to 4 is concerned. The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed so far as award of maintenance in favour of the first respondent is concerned. The order of maintenance by the learned Magistrate against the respondents 2 to 4 is set aside. _______________ K.G. SHANKAR, J Date: 27.01.2011 Isn