IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 6083 of 2008 Between: M/s.Jaya Lakshmi Automotives Private Limited, a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Naspur House 3-6-436/37/38, Himayath nagar, Hyderabad-28 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra pradesh, rep.by its Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, secretariat Hyderabad 2 The District Collector, Hyderabad District Nampally Hyderabad 3 The Tahasildar, Tirumalagiri Mandal Tirumalagiri, Hyderabad District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in seeking the alienate the land in SY.No.82/P and 157/1 of Thokatta and Bowenpally vilages in favour of third parties pending consideration of the petitoners representations for regularization in its favour as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of ARticle 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of thepetitioner for regularization in its favour and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No. 6083 of 2008 Order: The petitioner claims to have occupied the land in Survey Nos. 82/P and 157/1 of Thokatta and Bowenpally villages, long back and is in possession and enjoyment of the same. The petitioner states that it made representation dated 17.03.2008 to respondent No.2, namely the District Collector, Hyderabad, requesting him to regularize the land in its possession in terms of G.O. Ms. No.515 and G.O. Ms. No. 166, dated 16.02.2008, issued by respondent No.1-Government, but no action thereon had been taken. It is the grievance of the petitioner that pending disposal of its representation, the respondents are seeking to allot/alienate the land in its occupation and possession in favour of third parties. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and both of them agreed for disposal of the writ petition with the following directions: Respondent No.2, namely the District Collector, Hyderabad, is directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 17.03.2008 of the petitioner, in the light of G.O. Ms. No. 515 and G.O. Ms. No.166, dated 16.02.2008, and any other relevant G.Os., issued by respondent No.1-Government, and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously. Till final orders are passed on the representation of the petitioner, the respondents are directed not to allot/alienate the land claimed by the petitioner for regularization in favour of any third parties. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ___________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Date: 25.03.2008 Note: Issue CC today (B/O) Ksr/Nsr ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}