^ IN THE HIGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR [CHHATTISGARH1 f^i OF 2006 M.A. N( DIvlsion Besieft ^ APPELLANT INSURER Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. ^ through its Branch Manager, Branch Office, District - Raigarh [C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS CLAIMANT & HRIVER f OWNER RIVAL CLAIMANTS 1. Setram S/o Budharam Paikra, ^aged about 30 years, Kanwar by caste, R/o Village- Beskimuda, Tehsil- Gharghada, Dist.Raigarh [C.G.] 2. Minor Ku. Anju D/o Setram, aged about 2 years, Kanwar by caste, R/o Village- Beskimuda, Tehsil- Gharghada, Dist.Raigarh [C.G.] (through natural guardian father Setram S/o Budharam Paikra) 3, Kanhiyalal Sharma S/o Banwari ^ial Sharma R/o Village - Kotba, Tehsil - Pathalgaon, Dist. Jaspur Nagar (CG) 4. Manjeet Singh Bhatia S/o M.M. ^ Bhatia R/o Devendra Nagar, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 5. Shekhar Prasad S/o Shri Pawan ^Shai Kanwar by caste, aged 55 years, occupation-Farming, Village Chandagarh (Bhaisguda), Tehsil - Pathalgaon, Dist. Jaspur Nagar (CG) >. KaushaliyaW/o Shekhar Prasad ^Kanwar, aged 52 years, occupation - House Wife Village Chandagarh (Bhaisguda), Tehsil - Pathalgaon, Dist. Jaspur Nagar (CG) APPEAL U/SNt73 OF MOTOR JVEHICLES ACT AGAINST TBB AWARD/ORDER DATED 07^3-2006 PASSED BY THE3RD UPPER MOJ'ORACCIDBNT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL. DIST. RAIGARH PRECJDBD BY SHRI M.D.JAGDLLA. IN MACT [CLAIM1 CASE N0^6/2002. ^' Appeal v^aed_atKs._2^22^000^ Court Fee affixed Rs^lS^ The appellant respectfully begs to submit as under: XI-HC-78 Hi*«^T^*n^ 3^'^WTT^T, y>T{i'Mlt(o, Ri^i'yy< •mw^l^^-V5^-wi;20o6 @ 3T1^T q^T('{c|i^d<^T) 3TT^T ^T f^Tf^F ?TSTT3TT^T$h*4i<=t) Roshan/- ^ ^ ^RTTW ^rfN'W^?T 12.9.2006 Sliri Ghaashyam Patel, Advocate for flie appellant, Four weeks' tinie is granted to leanied counsel for the appeUaat to cure the defects as poiated out by the office, failhig which. fhe appeal shall staiid dismissed without fui-flier reference to fhe Bench, - <=hl^f^l41T1 HIH^tT^>tel^t<Rl^l< ^3Tf^T3TT^T Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. XI-HC-78 ^l^dl sb^lcb ^^^Trai^PT, ^Tfl^4l<o, fsicrtl^y ••"•A^RL--1^ 200^ m<\cc^^^^' 311^1 <4^cb (li^3^^) ^TT^T^rf^ri^ (T^T3TT^T$h+4i<=b ^<TT^R:^?T3TT^T cM^ld41Ti ^i^ciT^:telc^'<Ri<^i< ^3Tf^1T3TT^T 02-11-2006: This M.A(PR) No. 1359/2006 is treated as dismissed for non- compliance of peremptory order dated 12/09/2006, (For details note sheet part may kindly be seen.) Counsel be informed accordingly. Sd/- A.R.(J)