IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18338 of 2010 HARI YADAV son of late Ram Dayal Yadav, resident of village Tarengna, Police Station Bihta, District Patna, … …Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … OPPOSITE PARTY For the Petitioner: Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr.Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ----------- 3 30.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is in custody and seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under sections 304(B), 120(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioner’s prayer for bail had earlier been rejected on 27.10.2009 vide annexure 1. Learned counsel submits that this is a case of false implication of the petitioner, inasmuch as the dead body of the deceased was recovered by the police after 4-5 days of the occurrence and in fact, the petitioner had informed his in-laws regarding missing of his wife. Learned counsel for the State submits that the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail after consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case was rejected by this Court on 27.10.2009. Since the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail 2 was rejected after consideration of the merit of the case on 27.10.2009 and no fresh ground for consideration could be shown by the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge him on bail. This application is, accordingly, rejected. However, since the concerned Police Station case was registered in the year 2004 itself and the petitioner is stated to be in custody since 16.11.2008 coupled with the fact that the case has already been committed to the court of Sessions for trial as per the report at Flag ‘X’, it is expected from the trial court to make all possible efforts for concluding the trial at the earliest. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)