CWP No. 1861 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No. 8731 of 2009 and CWP No. 1861 of 2009 Date of Decision: August 28, 2009 Satinder Latka ...... Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.V.B.Aggarwal, Advocate for the applicant-appellant. Mr.Deepak Jindal, AAG, Haryana. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. CM No. 8731 of 2009 For the reasons recorded,this application is allowed and the writ petition is restored to its original number. CWP No. 1861 of 2009 On 5.2.2009 when the matter had come up for motion hearing,notice of motion was issued only on the ground that learned counsel had argued that there was no reason for issuing corrigendum and that no amendment had been carried out in the rules prior to the issuance of the advertisement. In the written statement it has been mentioned that by notification dated 6.11.2008 the Haryana Health Department Pharmacists CWP No. 1861 of 2009 2 (Group-C) Service Rules, 1998 were amended. It is thus clear that on the date when the original advertisement viz. 10.1.2009 was issued amendment had already been made. In view of the fact that notice of motion was issued only on this limited ground and this ground has been found to be incorrect, writ petition is dismissed. No costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE August 28, 2009 sunita