IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.16715 OF 2010 RAJ KUMAR YADAV @ MANTU YADAV, SON OF BHUNESHWAR YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHIRAIYAN TANR, P.S. RAM PORS, IN THE DISTRICT OF GAYA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 20.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under Sections 384, 385, 323, 379, 504 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, charge sheet has been submitted under Section 452 of the I.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except Section 452 of the I.P.C., all sections are bailable and in fact, the petitioner had purchased a piece of land from the informant and paid consideration of Rs.10,00,000/- to the informant through cheque. He submits that therefore, there is no substance in the allegation that petitioner and others put pressure upon the informant to get further land registered to him forcibly for which they had trespassed the house of the informant. Considering the above submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the application is disposed of with a direction to - 2 - petitioner (Raj Kumar Yadav @ Mantu Yadav) to surrender before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya within one month from today and upon his so surrendering, the court below shall allow him on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to its satisfaction in connection with M.M.C.H. P.S. Case No.29 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. B.T (J. N. Singh, J.)