HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.4129 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.03.2011 **** Paramjit Kaur & Ors. . . . . Petitioners VS. State of Punjab & Ors. . . . . Respondents **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG Punjab Mr. Sudhir Pruthi, Advocate for respondent No.3 ***** SURYA KANT J. (ORAL) (1). The only question that arises for consideration in this case is as to whether the petitioner constructed the disputed house before the coming into force of the Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995 or thereafter? (2). This Court in somewhat similar matter in CWP No.13007 of 2010 titled as Sanjay Aggarwal v. State of Punjab directed the respondents to re-determine the controversy as per the guidelines framed therein. (3). The writ petition is disposed in same terms and with similar directions. However, status quo shall continue to operate till the matter is decided afresh as per the directions in Sanjay Aggarwal’s case (supra). (4). Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 14.03.2011 vishal shonkar (S u r y a K a n t) Judge