IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1713 of 2010 KUMARJEET SINGH @ KUMAR JEE Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 19.01.2011 Heard both sides. The petitioner who has been declared juvenile in conflict with law, prays for grant of bail. His prayer for bail stood rejected by learned J.J.Board against which an appeal being Cr. Appeal No.74 of 2010 was also considered and rejected. The petitioner is charged under section 25(1-B)A/26/35 of the Arms Act. Allegation is that he was found possessed of one country-made loaded pistol. It is submitted that petitioner is in custody/remand home since 12.04.2010. The father of the petitioner has filed affidavit in support of the present application paragraph 7 of which reads as under: “That , the petitioner is languishing in remand home since 12.04.2010 without any fault and the father of the petitioner undertakes that he will not be the associates of any other known criminals and the father of the petitioner also undertakes that his son shall not accompany with bad elements of the localities are being released on bail.” A report from the concerned Probation Officer was called for which is placed at Flag A. Perused the said report. On a consideration of materials available on record 2 and after going through the averments made in the revision application as well as the contents of the report submitted by the Probation Officer, this Court is inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Consequently, the two orders passed by learned two courts below are quashed and set aside. The petitioner, abovenamed is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Munger in G.R. No.600A of 2010 arising out of Munger Kotwali P.S. Case no.128 of 2010 subject to the condition that (1) one of the bailors shall be father of the petitioner.(2) As disclosed in the revision application, the father shall monitor the conduct of the petitioner.(3) It shall also be the duty of the father of the petitioner to produce him before the court concerned as and when required. (4) During the subsistence of the present order if the petitioner is found involved in any other criminal case, the same shall be treated as breach of conditions of bail entailing cancellation of the same. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )