IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31856 of 2009 CHINTU NUT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 09/09/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody since 20.9.2008 in a police case registered against 8 to 10 unknown under Section- 395 of I.P.C. The submission is that nothing has been recovered from his possession nor was he apprehended on the spot. The impugned order of rejection refers to two paragraphs of the case diary for his “complicity”, but refuses to disclose the materials of complicity. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Sikarpur P.S. Case No.58/2008. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)