T BEFORETHE HON'BL^HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.(S)No.^<5r6 Qf 2011 PETITIONER ^' Nerus Kujur, S/o. Late E. Kujur, aged about 43 years, working as Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Versus RESPONDENTS :1) State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Co- operative • Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan, G.E. Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), ^ :2) The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Chhattisgarh Krishak Nagar, Labhabdi, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE^226^ OFLTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^:^5 ^^^ ^^^ ^ ?'/ s^ 3~sr ^I^IM'M, ©•fll'M'i'o,'{sT^n'^fy ..^AA±.l.^..:..s..l^til 3^'q3^(l<S)i^<!<«l) WtIIW ^lf?a 3iI^I SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava. J. respohdent imp^sed Therefdre 16-06-2011 Shri H.B. Agrawal, Senicjr counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel| advance copy. 'his petition has been fi| dated 25/4/11 passed by cumulative effect has been imp|: On petitioners own preferred against the order of Governor or' the State. order of penaity at this stage, v|i the matter and the appeal is Learned senior counsei of imposition of penalty and considered for promotion to th^ the Departmental Promotion ver^ soon. The apprehension of th^ would be the effect of the ordel by the Departmentat authority. Nevertheless, a '^Flfe^FT 'TR^ff ^f 'feT^ <f^^l< ^; affiCT StRST Counsel along with Ms. Meera Jaiswal, Lawyer for the State/respondents on |ed by the petitioner aggrieved by order No.1, by which the penalty without on the petitioner. shojwing, a departmental appeal has been l^enalty before theappeilate authority i.e. i, 1 am not inclined to interfere with the ^hen the appeilate authority is seized of pefiding consideration. |aised an apprehension that on aceount Ipendency of appeal, he may not be next higher post of Deputy Registrar in C(j>mmittee, which is iikeiy to be convened i^ petitioner is not well-founded. What of penaity is a matter for consideration Promcjtion Committee and the appointing Rovernment servant is entitled for Ual-iWIM—FS/140—2/201 1—1,50,000. -i- •»^ •^ t. ''»*.--,i <tl ei'^sy -z^ -s^ ^iiAiiyAi,. eiilyis, t^iray Lopc^ •^D'^^ir DeepH 'renwHfe'Bi^'B ^ avaiiable to him under the lawi him or if he is found unfit for pr^motion ^RN^rat3 'WRff 4 IscS <(<iit«(i< ^sffiptan^i consldsration of nis case by t|he Uepanmeniai i-'romotlon Committee, even in a case, where he has ^uffered an order of penalty. Accordingiy, the petiti^n is finally disposed off, however, resen/ing liberty to the petition^r to take recourse to remedy as may be in case, the appeal is decided against ,^nSbnv^ava ^aniBdra!Se