1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.W.NO.2566 of 2011 in WRIT PETITION NO. 776 of 2008. (Dr. (Mrs.) Mrunalini Kishor Chiddarwar..vs..Medical Council of India & ors.) =-=-==-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. S.V.Purohit, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. Bhangde, Adv. for respondent no.1. Mr.P.C.Marpakwear, Adv. for R.2 and 3. C ORAM : D.D.Sinha AND A.P.Bhangale, JJ. DATED : 16/11/2011. Civil application No.2566 of 2011 is moved by the respondent nos.2 and 3 – Management for dismissal of the petition. The learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the writ petition is directed against the order dated 26.4.2007 issued by respondent no.1 whereby respondent nos.2 and 3 were informed that the petitioners do not fulfill the eligibility criteria and therefore, unfit to be appointed as a Lecturer in Bio Chemistry subject. It is contended that, at the time of admission of the writ petition, the court had granted interim relief and therefore, the petitioners continued to serve as a Lecturer till the date of their resignations i.e. 30.4.2009 and 31.12.2010 respectively. It is contended that the Management has paid the salary to the 2 petitioners since the petitioners have performed their duty as a Lecturer for all these years. Mr.Bhangde, learned counsel for respondent no.1 has submitted that since the petitioners were not eligible to be appointed as a Lecturer in the concerned subject, this issue needs to be decided. Be that as it may, since the petitioners have already been resigned from the post and have been paid salary for the work discharged by them as a Lecturer till the date of their retirement, we do not propose to keep the present petition pending. In the circumstances, it is for the respondent – Management to consider these aspects and act accordingly. Since the petitioners have resigned from the post with effect from 30.4.2009 and 31.12.2010, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petition pending. Hence, writ petition is disposed of. Civil application is also disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE. chute