IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC(T) No. 156 of 2008 Decided on: 01.10.2010 Mr. Sanjeev Thakur, …Petitioner Versus Nand Lal Thakur. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner. : None. For the respondent : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P.Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for the respondent. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Since the petitioner has been re-engaged on the same terms and conditions w.e.f. 5.9.2001, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge October 1, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?