1 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.503 OF 2006 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1045 OF 2005 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.37 OF 2005 IN CASE NO.1990-K-528 Arvind Jeram Kotecha. ...Appellant. Vs. Prabhudas Damodar Kotecha. ...Respondent. --- Mr.Virag Tulzapurkar, Sr. Advocate with Mr.K.G.Munshi i/b. Mr.A.R.Vaidya, for Appellant. Mr.P.R.Zaiwala, Sr.Advocate i/b. Mr.J.J.Thakkar, for Respondent. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & V.R.KINGAONKAR,JJ. DATED: 30th MARCH, 2010 P.C.: 1. On a motion made by the learned Counsel appearing for Respondent, chamber summons no.1045 of 2005 is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to 2 take out a fresh chamber summons claiming the same reliefs. As a result of withdrawal of the chamber summons, the order passed by the learned Single Judge on that chamber summons which is impugned in the appeal does not survive, rendering this appeal infructuous. The appeal is, therefore, disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.) (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) ...