ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2800 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.2800 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO.2800 OF 2005 IN IN IN FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.1171 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.1171 OF 2005 APPEAL NO.1171 OF 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.P.S.Dani i/by Mr. A.P.Kulkarni for the Applicant. Mr.Bhutekar i/by Mr.U.P.Warunjikar for Respondent No.1. Mr.A.M.Kulkarni for Respondent Nos. 2 and 5. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 24th June, 2008 : 24th June, 2008 : 24th June, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Considering the dispute raised and as the First Appeal is admitted and further in view of the averments made, this Court has already granted the order of status-quo which has been in force since 30/08/2005 and even otherwise in the interest of justice, it is desirable that the application as prayed need to be ( 2 ) granted i.e. restraining the defendants from creating any third party right, title and interest over the possession of the suit property pending the decision of the first Appeal. 2. The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), with liberty. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]