(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 11554 OF 2010 Uttam Lalsing (Vanjari) Jadhav. .. Petitioner (Original defendant no.1) versus Gariba Dhirsingh Jadhav (Vanjari), and 2 others. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. S.I. Nandode, Advocate, for the petitioner. ........................ CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 5TH JANUARY 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. Perused the impugned order passed below Exhibit 6 and the judgment delivered in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 12/2009. (2) 2. The findings recorded are concurrent and against the petitioner / defendant. 3. Mr. S.I. Nandode, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner / defendant, states that after filing of petition, the defendant got knowledge of some orders passed by the revenue authorities and those orders have material bearing on controversy. He states that an application for amendment of written statement has been accordingly moved before the trial court. 4. If the petitioner has got any other material with him, to show that the view reached by the courts, concurrently, could not have been taken, it is open to the petitioner to proceed in accordance with law, in the matter. 5. Subject to liberty, if any, present Writ Petition is disposed of, as I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity with the impugned orders. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp11554