IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18198 of 2011 SANTOSH GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 13.6.2011 After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, who is the husband of the complainant of Complaint Case no. 1975 C of 2008 and after considering the submission, what the court desires is to direct the S.D.J.M., Patna, who is trying the aforesaid complaint case, to call the complainant and the present petitioner into his chambers by drawing up an order to the above effect and showing the same to the counsel of both the parties. The petitioner must appear on the date fixed by the court below, which shall impress upon the parties the wisdom of joining each other so as to lead a happy matrimonial life and, in case the lady appears agreeable to joining the petitioner without putting forth any unreasonable conditions or she simply refuses to join the petitioner in his house for no sound reasons, then in that case, the S.D.J.M., Patna himself shall admit the petitioner to bail on execution of a bond to his own satisfaction. If the petitioner appears putting forth conditions for taking back the lady or appears disregarding the direction of this court as also of the lower court to join the reconciliation process as presently ordered, then in that case, there could not be any order for bail in his favour. It may be a case in which the court below may take a couple of dates or more than those dates reaching in striking settlement 2 between the parties. For that much period, the petitioner shall not be arrested or remanded to custody. With the aforesaid observation/direction, this application stands disposed of. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)