1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition NO. 4200/2010 Bindeshariprasad G. Gupta Vs. Rupesh B. Vairagade Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. Deshpande , Adv. for the petitioner. CORAM: B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 30TH AUGUST, 2010. Heard Advocate Deshpande for the petitioner. The application seeking leave to amend written statement after cross-examination of the plaintiff has been rejected by the trial Court. The only reason is given is inadvertence. After hearing Advocate Dehspande, I do not find any jurisdictional error or perversity warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. With liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order after civil suit is finally decided if the circumstances so warrants, present writ petition is disposed of. JUDGE Ambulkar.