:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITION NO.36 OF 2008 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.36 OF 2008 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.36 OF 2008 M/s. Om Sai Developers ...Petitioner. v. Mr.D.R.Patil & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.N.V.Walawalkar, Sr.Counsel a/w Shri Shriram S. Redij , advs. for the Petitioner/Appellant. Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni, adv. for the Respondent No.2. Mr.Sakhare Sr. Counsel a/w H.Toor i/by S.K.Legal Associates, advs. for the Respondent No.4. Shri V.A.Thorat, Sr.Counsel a/w Shri Vipin Kamdi, advs. for the Respondent No.3 (Society). Shri S.N.Gawde, AGP for the State. WITH WITH WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.71 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.71 OF 2008 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.71 OF 2008 WITH WITH WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.84 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.84 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.84 OF 2008 M/s. Om Sai Developers ...Appellant. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.N.V.Walawalkar Sr. Counsel for the Appellant. Mr.S.N.Gawde, AGP for the Respondent No.1. Shri A.Y.Sakhare Sr.Counsel i/by M/s. S.K.Legal Associates for the Respondent No.4. Shri J.G.Reddy, adv. for the Respondent No.2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 5th February, 2008. DATE: 5th February, 2008. DATE: 5th February, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. After marathon arguments by the learned senior counsel for all the parties, the learned senior counsel :2: agreed that the appeal as well as the Special Civil Suit No.2145 of 2005 pending before the City Civil Court, Mumbai may be disposed off with consent. Therefore, the appeal stands disposed off with the following directions: i. The order passed on 10th March, 2005 by the Slum Rehabilitation Authorities is hereby set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Slum Rehabilitation Authority for hearing the parties again and to pass the reasoned order as to whether termination of the plaintiff as a developer was prima-facie valid, as per the directions given by the Division Bench earlier. The Slum Rehabilitation Authority shall decide the matter within four weeks from this day. Parties will appear before the Slum Rehabilitation Authority on 11th February, 2008. Parties shall be at liberty to file written notes of the arguments also in addition to the oral arguments, if they so desire. Till the decision of the SRA, the order passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai on 10th January, 2008 shall continue to be in force. Parties shall co-operate SRA in early decision. ii. The plaintiff shall appear before the trial Court and withdraw the suit. In view of the disposal of the appeal, civil application does not survive and stands disposed off accordingly. All the contentions of the parties are kept open and may be taken into :3: consideration by the SRA. 2. In view of the above, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner does not press the contempt petition and accordingly it stands disposed off. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)