IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Criminal Misc. No. M-46485 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision:25.04.2008 Subhash .....Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. Satish Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Navneet Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sanjeev Sheokand, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5. **** RAJESH BINDAL J. Prayer in the present petition is for cancellation of bail granted to respondents No.2 to 5 by learned Additional Sessions Judge vide orders dated 29.6.2006 and 12.10.2006. The primary contention raised by learned counsel for the petitioner in support of the prayer was that after getting the concession of bail, the private respondents were not allowing the trial to make any progress. They were absenting themselves from the trial with an object to frustrate early disposal thereof and the witnesses were also being threatened. Learned counsel for the State submits that the entire prosecution evidence has already been completed and now the case is fixed for defence evidence on 10.5.2008. In view of the above development, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. April 25, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE