IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.M-123 of 2008 Date of decision:14.01.2009. Vikram ...Appellant. Versus Munesh ...Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. R.N.Kush, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Bahadur Singh, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. (ORAL) The appellant – husband and also the respondent – wife are present in person. They are identified by their learned respective counsel. They reiterate the terms and conditions of the compromise which were noticed in the order dated 30.10.2008 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court (T.P.S.Mann, J.). The respondent – wife assures that she would render all possible cooperation in case a plea for withdrawal of criminal case under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC is filed before the learned Trial Court and that she would also withdraw the petition filed by her under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. The parents of the appellant have also filed a plea for quashment of the criminal case under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC. She further assures that she, as a complainant, would concede the grant thereof when the matter comes up before the concerned Bench of this Court. She further wants the release of the dowry articles which are in the custody of the Court. In response thereto, learned counsel for the appellant informs that the appellant shall not oppose the release of those articles on sapurdari. The orders in the relevant behalf (in the context of the prosecution under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC and also for the release of dowry articles) have to be passed by the concerned Courts in accordance with law. In the light of the fact that the parties have come to terms, the appeal filed by the appellant shall stand allowed. The marriage between the parties shall stand dissolved. Disposed of accordingly. January 14, 2009 S.D.Anand) vinod Judge