IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P No.15858 of 1993 (O&M) Date of Decision:16.9.2011 Phool Kumar .... Petitioner Versus The Haryana State Electricity Board and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. R.K. Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vijay Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) Through the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking employment in the respondent-Electricity Board (HPGCL) in terms of the respondents' policy to employ one member of the family whose land has been acquired for construction of the Thermal Power Plant at Panipat (Haryana). Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents states that the respondents shall consider the case of the petitioner in terms of the respondents' existing policy. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the present petition as comprehensive representation and decide the same in terms of the policy applicable to the petitioner within two months from today. 16.9.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE