: 1 : chs-1495-10=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1495 OF 2010 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3337 OF 1997 IN SUIT NO. 3668 OF 1997 Sorab K. Modi .. Plaintiff v/s. Bank of Baroda & Ors. .. Defendants ......... Mr. Sorab K. Modi plaintiff in person Ms. Prachi Mhatre i/b M.S. Bodhanwala for defendant nos. 1 to 7 ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J DATE : 22nd AUGUST, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard plaintiff in person. Perused schedule which is annexed to the chamber summons. A perusal of the said schedule goes to show that paragraph nos. 1 to 6 are to be added in the plaint. However, at appropriate place where, they are to be added is not specifically mentioned in the schedule. : 2 : chs-1495-10=.sxw 2. On enquiry with the plaintiff as to whether he would like to amend the prayer clause, he answered in the affirmative. However, the schedule is not specific about it as to which prayer clause is to be newly added. Hence, it would be proper to take out the proper chamber summons with the appropriate prayers. On hearing this, plaintiff applied for withdrawal of this chamber summons with liberty to take out fresh chamber summons for the reliefs similar to the reliefs asked in the present chamber summons. 3. Chamber summons is allowed to be withdrawn. Liberty as prayed for is granted. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)