IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45615 of 2007 SITA RAM SINGH & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5 19.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.P.P. for the State. There is no cogent explanation coming from the counsel for the petitioners as to why they have chosen to move this court for anticipatory bail after more than 5 years for institution of the case. In absence of any explanation, this court is not inclined to exercise its power under section 438 and extended the benefit to the petitioners. They have liberty to take recourse to law as may be advised. The anticipatory bail application is dismissed. Rajeev/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)