HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24426 of 2010 Date 01.10.2010 Between: Syed Shah Mohammed Hussaini and others. ..... PETITIONER AND The Government of A.P., rep. By its District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdika pul, Hyderabad and others. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri Nazir Ahmed Khan Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24426 of 2010 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside the Memo No.B/575/2010 dated 03.07.2010 issued by respondent No.3. I have heard Sri Nazir Ahmed Khan, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and perused the record. By the impugned memo, respondent No.3 has informed the counsel for the petitioners that though the names of Khaja Begum, Syed Shamahammed Hussain, Mahamood Hussain, Anwar Hussain, Wahillula Hussain, Rawoof Hussain, Saber Hussain, Akbar Hussain and Naseerunissa were partly recorded as pattadars in respect of Sy.Nos.301, 367, 368, 369, 371, 548 and 549 of Mangalpally Village, their names are not recorded in possession columns and, therefore, their request for issuance of pattadar pass books and title deeds cannot be considered. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the rejection order passed by respondent No.3 is contrary to the provisions of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (for short ‘the Act’) and the rules made thereunder. Learned Counsel has, however, not disputed that the impugned order of rejection is amenable to a statutory appeal under Section 5(5) of the Act. Ordinarily, this Court does not entertain the Writ Petitions filed bypassing the alternative remedy of appeal. In my opinion, as the petitioner has an efficacious remedy of appeal available, the Writ Petition cannot be entertained. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to file an appeal before respondent No.2. If such an appeal is filed, this Court has no reason to doubt that the appellate authority will dispose of the same, after giving notice to all the necessary parties, expeditiously. As a sequel to dismissal of the main petition, WPMP.No.31266 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:01.10.2010 usd