IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2991 of 2010 ASHOK BELDAR S/O CHANDER BELDAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 30.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under sections 328, 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Even though in the First Information Report the allegation is that the in laws of the deceased killed her for demand of dowry but from the First Information Report itself it appears that the deceased had been removed to the hospital before her death. However, after investigation charge sheet was submitted under Section 328 and 302/34 of Indian Penal Code and, therefore, it would not be a case of presumption against the accused persons. In view of such, let the petitioner, who is in custody since 25.5.2008, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Chandauti, P.S. case 2 no. 77/2008, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)