THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2649 OF 2007 ORDER: The petitioner filed this revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 {“CPC” for brevity}, inter alia, seeking to assail the correctness of the order dated 05.05.2007 in E.P.No.20 of 2005 in O.S.No.139 of 1998 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Addanki, in allowing the application filed under Order XXI Rule 11 (2) CPC, seeking to issue notice to the judgment debtor, enquire his means and send him to civil prison for realization of decree amount. After contest, the Court below came to conclusion that in spite of possessing sufficient means, the petitioner is avoiding to discharge the liability and hence, issued warrant for arrest. Hence, the revision. While admitting the revision on 28.06.2007, this Court granted interim stay subject to the condition that the petitioner deposits half of the EP amount within four {4} weeks from that day and further, the time granted earlier was extended on 20.09.2007 up to 01.10.2007. Now, it is represented that the said amount has already been paid. Be that as it may, having regard to the fact that the finding as to possessing sufficient means and failure on the part of the petitioner to discharge the liability, being finding of fact, it does not call for any interference. Hence, I do not find any merits in the revision. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. However, the petitioner is permitted to deposit the entire amount under the E.P., including the balance, within a period of three {3} months from today. On such deposit, the respondent shall withdraw the same, without furnishing any security. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) 26th August 2010 RRB