- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2304 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.2304 OF 2007 APPLICATION NO.2304 OF 2007 Mahakaushal Agrotech Ltd. ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Ms Reshma Mishra with Mr.Dharmendra Rohra for the applicant Mr.Subhash Jha i/b M/s.Law Global for Respondent No.2 Mr.Y.S.Shinde A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 27,2008 : AUGUST 27,2008 : AUGUST 27,2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned counsel for the second Respondent (Security and Exchange Board of India) on written instructions of his client states that the second Respondent is agreeable for compounding offence subject to payment of Rs.50,000/- towards compounding charges and Rs.75,000/- towards legal charges to the second Respondent for settlement of the case. He states that accordingly a reply to the compounding application will be filed before the learned Magistrate on the next date i.e. 16th October 2008. 2. The statment made by the leraned counsel for the second respondent on instructions of the second Respondnet is accepted. In view of this statemet, nothing survives in this application and the same is disposed of. - 2 - JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE