IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 14TH JANUARY 2011 / 24TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 321 of 2011(M) ------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. T.A.ANWAR, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O.ALI, THANIKKAPPILLI HOUSE, MAMBRA, ERAYAMKUDY PO, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. T.I.ASHRAF, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.T.A.IBRAHIM,THURUTHUIPPURAM, MAMBRA, ERAYAMKUDY PO, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. T.I.MOHAMMEDALI, AGED 62 YEARS, S/O.T.A.IBRAHIM,THURUTHUIPPURAM, MAMBRA, ERAYAMKUDY PO, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. T.K.ABDUL KAREEM, AGED 44 YEARS S/O.T.A.IBRAHIM,THURUTHUIPPURAM, MAMBRA, ERAYAMKUDY PO, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. C.I.NASEER, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.C.K.IBRAHIM, CHANDRATHIL HOUSE, MAMBRA, ERAYAMKUDY PO, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 6. C.I.NASAR, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.C.K.IBRAHIM,CHANDRATHIL HOUSE, MAMBRA, ERAYAMKUDY PO, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.KHALID SRI.T.P.SAJID RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. MAMABRA MUHIYIDHEEN PALLY JUMA ATH COMMITTEE, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY K.K.MOHAMMED SHEREEF,MAMBRA, ERAYAMKKUDY PO, THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 304. 2. MAMABRA MUHIYIDHEEN PALLY JUMA ATH COMMITTEE, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT V.A.ABDUL KAREEM, VENCHANAPILLY MAMBRA, ERAYAMKKUDY PO,THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 304. 3. KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ERNAKULAM-17 SC SRI. A.A. ABULHASSAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.321 OF 2011(M) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners herein are the petitioners in O.P.No.80/2010 on the file of the 3rd respondent. The matter pertains to the election that was held and the disciplinary action that was initiated against the petitioners. In this writ petition, what is sought for by the petitioners is to direct the 3rd respondent to expedite the proceedings and that in the meanwhile to stay their suspension from the Committee. 2. Standing counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent has obtained instructions in the matter and submits that pleadings in the matter have been completed and that the 3rd respondent is making endeavors to find out an amicable settlement to the dispute. It is stated that in that process the 3rd respondent is directed the parties to appear and that on the last two occasions though the parties did not appear, counsel on their behalf were present. It is stated that the matter is now posted on 25.1.2011 for appearance of the parties. According to the standing counsel the matter does not settle as expected, the Board will proceed WPC.No. 321/2011 :2 : with the matter. 3. Now that the Board has already initiated steps in the matter I do not think it is necessary for this court to issue any further directions. Therefore, I direct that if the parties appear before the Board on 25.1.2011, the Board shall take efforts to find out an amicable settlement of the dispute and if the Board is not succeeding in its endeavor, the Board shall proceed with the matter in accordance with law. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners contended that pending consideration of the matter, suspension of the petitioners shall be stayed. If they have such a prayer, it will be open to the petitioners to move the Board for appropriate relief. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. 321/2011 :3 :