IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL TUESDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2011 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 28403 of 2011(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SMT.RADHAMONY AMMA, ANU BHAVAN, KAIPUZHA MURI, KULANADA VILLAGE, KOZHENCHERRY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.HARIKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA-686 503. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA-686 503. 3. THE PRINCIPAL SUB INSPECTOR, PANDALAM-686 510. 4. VALSALA DEVI, W/O.RAGHAVAN PILLAI, SARITHA BHAVAN, KAIPPUZHA, KULANADA, PANDALAM-686 510. 5. RAGHAVAN PILLAI, SARITHA BHAVAN, KAIPPUZHA, KULANADA, PANDALAM-686 510. 6. HARISH KUMAR, S/O.RAGHAVAN PILLAI, SARITHA BHAVAN, KAIPPUZHA, KULANADA, PANDALAM-686 510. ADV. SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS FOR R4 TO 6 SR.G.P.SRI. M.K. ABOOBACKER FOR R1 TO R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1- A TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.2528/1991 OF PANDALAM S.R.O. EXHIBIT P2- A TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM INJUCTION ORDER DT. 19.9.2008 IN IA 2090/2008 IN O.S.NO.437/08 OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA. EXHIBIT P3- A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT.3.10.2009. EXHIBIT P4- TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DT.26.4.2010. EXHIBIT P5- TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 18.5.2009. EXHIBIT P6- TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT.12.7.2010 IN WP(C) NO. 21613/2010. EXHIBIT P7- A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DT.25.7.2010. EXHIBIT P8- A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT.17.1.2011 ISSUED BY DIST.COLLECTOR, PTA. EXHIBIT P9- A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DT.10.3.2011. EXHIBIT P10- A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 3.4.2011 BEFORE PANDALAM POLICE. EXHIBIT P11- A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.318/2011 OF PANDALAM POLICE STATION. EXHIBIT P12- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT.7.10.2011 SUBMITTED BEFORE RESPONDENT 1. EXHIBIT P13- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT.7.10.2011 SUBMITTED BEFORE RESPONDENTS 3. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE CL PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & K. HARILAL,JJ. .................................................................... W.P.(C).NO.28403 OF 2011 ................................................................... Dated this the 6th day of December, 2011. JUDGMENT Pius C. Kuriakose, J. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks further time. According to us, the interim order which we have issued on 31.10.2011 grants to the petitioner all possible reliefs. The contesting party respondents also cannot have any legitimate grievance against that interim order. We dispose of this writ petition confirming the above interim order and relegating the parties to seek other reliefs in appropriate civil proceedings. We make it clear that civil dispute between the parties will be settled by a competent civil court. Criminal case will be decided by competent criminal court. Statutory proceedings will be decided by the statutory authorities, who are in seizin of the matter in accordance with law. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. K.HARILAL,JUDGE. cl