1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3550 OF 1991 Aram Nagar Tenants Welfare Association. ...Petitioner. vs. 1. State of Maharashtra and others. ...Respondents. --- Mr.M.M.Vashi, for Petitioner. Mr.Ravi Kadam, Advocate General with Mr.G.W.Mattos, for Respondent nos.1 & 2. Mr.Y.S.Jahagirdar, Sr. Advocate i/b. Ms.Rutuja Ambekar, for Respondent nos.3 to 12. Mr.C.M.Lokesh, for Interveners present. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATED: 29th September,2009 P.C.:- 1. A request is made by the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner to withdraw the petition. The learned Counsel states that the Executive committee of 2 the petitioner-Society has passed a resolution for withdrawal of this petition because there is a tripartite agreement reached between the Petitioner- Society, the MHADA  Respondent no.2 and the Developer. The request for withdrawal of the petition is opposed by the Interveners who claim to be the members of General Body of the Society. According to them, they are taking steps to get the Resolution of the Executive Committee cancelled either by the Competent Court of Law or by the General Body, and for that they seek two weeks time. 2. Taking overall view of the matter, considering that as admittedly there is a resolution of the Executive Committee passed for withdrawal of the petition, we cannot force the petitioner to continue with the petition. In our opinion, the following order would meet the ends of justice:- The petition is permitted to be withdrawn. However, the interveners are granted liberty to move this Court either in this petition or by a fresh petition, in case either the Resolution of the 3 Executive Committee for withdrawal of the petition, is set aside by the Competent Court of law or that Resolution is withdrawn by a Resolution of the General body in accordance with law. 3. Considering that the members of the General Body of the Society proposes to move for setting aside the resolution of the Executive Committee, the learned Counsel appearing for MHADA stated before us that no fresh steps pursuant to tripartite agreement referred to above, will be taken for a period of four weeks from today. The statement is accepted. Petition disposed of. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (R.G.KETKAR, J.)