CR No.68/2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.68/2011 Date of Decision : 7.1.2011. Union of India ..........Petitioner v Sukhpal Kaur and others ..........Respondents. Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Ms.Sharmila Sharma,Advocate for the petitioner Jaswant Singh,J.(Oral). This order will dispose of 26* Civil Revisions bearing No. C.R. No.68 of 2011 to 93 of 2011, as common questions of facts and law are involved in these petitions. For the sake of convenience, facts are being taken from CR No.68/20111. Briefly noticed the facts of the present case are land of the respondents alongwith others was acquired by Government of India vide notifications dated 8.6.1979 and 26.10.1979 issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act,1894 (for short the Act). The Land Acquisition Collector pronounced the award on 30.3.1981 and the awarded compensation was paid to the respondents. Thereafter they filed reference under section 18 of the Act and compensation was further enhanced by the learned Additional District Judge vide award dated 29.4.1986. Still dis-satisfied, the respondents as well as petitioner-UOI filed Regular First Appeals in this Court and vide order CR No.68/2011 2 dated 21.5.1987 the compensation was further enhanced. Still further respondents as well as UOI filed LPAs which were disposed of vide order dated 30.1.1989 on the basis of decision of this Court in RFA No.440 of 1986. Petitioner-UOI filed Special Leave Petition against the order dated 30.1.1989 which was allowed and benefit of Section 23 (1A) was set aside. The respondents/decree holders filed execution petitions and to satisfy the same the petitioner-UOI had deposited the entire decretal amount. It appears that after the decision of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Gurpreet Singh v. Union of India, 2008(2) RCR (Civil) 207, permitting interest on solatium being part of compensation, in case the same was allowed by the Reference Court or the Appellate Court, fresh applications by the respondents/decree holders alongwith calculation sheets in terms of judgment of Hon'ble the Surpeme Court in Gurpreet Singh's case (supra) were filed in the execution proceedings. As per calculation sheets attached with the execution petitions, the decree holders claimed interest on solatium in terms of judgment in Gurpreet Singh's case supra. The Executing Court after taking into consideration the calculation sheet directed the petitioner- judgment debtor to pay an amount of Rs.22,771/- to the decree holders whose land was acquired way back in the year 1979. Aggrieved against the same, UOI/judgment debotor has filed the present revision petition. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the calculation sheet, on the basis of which an amount of Rs.22,771/- CR No.68/2011 3 has been found due towards Judgment Debtor-UOI is not in accordance with the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Gurpreet Singh's case (supra). After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I find no merit in this submission of the learned counsel. This Court in identical matters in respect of other co-land owners having been granted similar relief in petitions bearing CR No.6040/2009 (Union of India v. Mukhtiar Singh and others decided on 19.1.2010) and CR No.4949/2010 (Union of India and another v. Jagbeant Singh decided on 17.8.2010) has already considered the similar plea raised on behalf of the petitioner and found that there is no legal infirmity in the impugned order. In my opinion, the calculation sheets submitted by the respondents, which are part of the paper book, and the amount found due is in conformity with the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Gurpreet Singh's case (supra) and no fault can be found with the same. No material has been placed on record to show how the calculation sheets are incorrect. Dismissed. A copy of this order be placed on the files of connected Civil Revisions. 7.1.2011 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge *1. C.R. No.68 of 2011 Union of India v. Sukhpal Kaur and others 2. C.R. No.69 of 2011 Union of India v. Jaswant Singh and others CR No.68/2011 4 3. C.R. No.70 of 2011 Union of India v. Bachhna Singh and another 4. C.R. No.71 of 2011 Union of India v. Darshan Singh and others 5. C.R. No.72 of 2011 Union of India v. Sadhu Singh and others 6. C.R. No.73 of 2011 Union of India v. Jaswant Singh and others 7. C.R. No.74 of 2011 Union of India v. Jaswant Singh and others 8. C.R. No.75 of 2011 Union of India v. Tarsem Lal and others 9. C.R. No.76 of 2011 Union of India v. Lal Singh 10. C.R. No.77 of 2011 Union of India v. Darshan Kumar and another 11. C.R. No.78 of 2011 Union of India v. Bara Singh and others 12. C.R. No.79 of 2011 Union of India v. Joginder Singh 13. C.R. No.80 of 2011 Union of India v. Choto and others 14. C.R. No.81 of 2011 Union of India v. Nachhattar Singh and others 15. C.R. No.82 of 2011 Union of India v. Cahtin Kaur and others 16. C.R. No.83 of 2011 Union of India v. Angrej Singh and another 17. C.R. No.84 of 2011 Union of India v. Amardeep Singh 18. C.R. No.85 of 2011 Union of India v. Binder Singh CR No.68/2011 5 19. C.R. No.86 of 2011 Union of India v. Ranjir Kaur and another 20. C.R. No.87 of 2011 Union of India v. Mukhtiar Singh and others 21. C.R. No.88 of 2011 Union of India v. Jaswinder Singh and another 22. C.R. No.89 of 2011 Union of India v. Ganda Singh and another 23. C.R. No.90 of 2011 Union of India v. Chand Singh and others 24. C.R. No.91 of 2011 Union of India v. Nahar Singh 25. C.R. No.92 of 2011 Union of India v. Janga Singh and others 26. C.R. No.93 of 2011 Union of India v. Surjit Kaur and others