CWP No.2726 of 2008. 19.12.2008. Present: Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. The petitioner has been transferred though the petitioner would be retiring on 31st January, 2010. We have perused the writ petition and heard the learned counsel for the parties. We find that the petitioner has given choice of his station as well, so as he can have his pre retirement efforts to settle down finally after retirement. It has been further contended that the children of the petitioner are studying in Class 11th and 12th and unfortunately his wife has left for heavenly abode. In case on the above grounds if we show interference and issue directions granting relief to the petitioner, we are afraid that we would entering into the domain of the Executive. Normally, this Court does not show interference unless there is a peculiar circumstance of the case. Therefore, the interest of justice will suffice if the petitioner makes a representation to the authority concerned within a period of three days along with a certified copy of this order. In case the representation is made, the same shall be considered and disposed of within a period of ten days thereafter. Till the disposal of the representation, no coercive method be used against the petitioner. With these observations and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of and so also the pending application. (Jagdish Bhalla), C.J. 19th December, 2008. (Kuldip Singh), J. (tr)