IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 23057 of 2003 Between: Sabbella Sathi Reddy s/o Saheb Reddy r/o Komaripalem Biccavolu Mandal E.G.Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Principal Secretary PR& RD Department. The Govt. Of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer Anaparti Mandal E.G. Dist. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Rajahmundry Division E.G. Dist. Rajahmundry 4 Collector & Dist. Magistrate East Godavari Dist. Kakinada .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T.V.S.PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for a Writ of Mandamus or other writ, order or direction with the following substantive relief:- “to declare the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the impugned notiﬁcation G.O.Rt.No.1391, PR & RD (PTS.III) Dept. dated 23.09.2003 to acquire the land to an extent of Ac.0.29 cents in Sy.No.371/1B situated at Anaparthy Village, Kothuru Sivar, Anaparthy Mandal of East Godavari District, as illegal, arbitrary, malaﬁde and violative of the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act and consequently direct the respondents to drop further proceedings including dispossession of the petitioner from the said land, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem ﬁt and proper in the circumstances of the case.” At the hearing, Sri T.V.S.Prabhakara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, placed before this Court letter, dated 21.11.2007, addressed by the Tahsildar, Anaparthi, to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajahmundry, wherein it is stated that the petitioner is willing to relinquish the land to an extent of Ac. 0.10 cents in Sy.No.371/1B of Kothuru, H/o.Anaparthi village, as against the land to an extent of 0.29 cents, which was proposed to be acquired from the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that in view of the acceptance of the said proposal of the petitioner by the respondents, no further orders need be passed in this writ petition. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.28922 of 2003 is disposed of as infructuous. _______________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 24.10.2008 v v