:-.fal ^laLt: uL.a-ti.! IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.Cr.t WRIT PETITION N0. !3)^/2006 PETITIONER ^^^s3^ <3Si^:> ^ ^c^ rf^''' .^** >'';' w- RESPONDENTS ^^ ^^^^ <y^, ^\ ^ $<^ /' Dr. B.L. G-upta, S/o. Shri R.D. Gupta, Aged about 43 years, Veteririaiy Assistant Surgeon, I/c. Centa-al Semen Station, Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Tbrough its Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture (Veterinaiy), Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /I. Director, Veterinary Services Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 3. Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITrON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITimON QF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE^QF^WRIT^nLTHE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIOSUURI^ REtOHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SOTTABLE WRIT OR WMTS, ORDER OR ORDERS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. XI-HC-22 aTI^C^T •f^li373Il^i WIWafffB -3S( ^fSSEvR, W3K{SVS, ^nWV. ^'^^^y^^^ ••^'•^ 200' ., ' . T- <RI^I wnw: ^IB?I W.P.No.1313/2t)06.13U/20Q6A1315/2006 3-4-200e Shri Manindra Shriw wim4h •sT(w:ff"ii fea xte?iT •^T 3lfiiOT •3!I^[ stava, Sr. Advocate with Shri Ashish Shrivastava, counsei for the p^titioners. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate fbr the State. By this common order W.P.No.1313/2006, 1314/2006 & 1315/2006 shall be disposed of. Heard. The petitioners were Sppointed as Members of the Technical Committee vide order dated 2"? fecial scheme for distribution of animals to various animals under the sp^( the weaker sections of the ^ociety by the State of Chhattisgarh. The petitioners' job was to checkut) the medical fitness and matters related to the health of the animals. it W.P.No.1314/2006) submittec) Annexure-P/9 & Dr. B.L. < submitted his representation contended that while issuing! -1-2005for vaccination and examination of is contended that distribution job was not done by the petitioners and th^t was done by the other officials under the supervisipn ofJoint Director/" Djeputy Director. Shri Shrivastava, leaijned senior counsei appearing for the petitioners, contended that ti^e suspension order was passed on the ground that the petiiioners h^d eoramitted iilegalityand irregularity in distribution, but that was not tite job of the petitioners and the suspension order is wholiy arbjtrary. LeE|rned counsel contended that.Dr. S.K.S. Gaharwar (petitionerin W.P.l*i|o.1313/2006) submitted his representgtion on 8-2-2006 as per Anne^ure-P/9, Dr. D.K. Patel (petitioner in his representation on 8-2-2006 as per jiupta (petitioner in W.P.No.1315/2006) [on 20-2-2006 as per Annexure-P/9. It is notice by this Court on 27-3-2006 the XI-HC-22 311^1 ^I • •f?;frsnt^ Gowri ^ y <*' ^' ^e[ •;q;2iRTq, »fl"iHlts,teTOTy w^\^ ^^^w^ "B^ 20° an^I^CTWdfei ' -z- respondents were directed to meantime it was also directed to decide the representation of the petitioners. it is pointed out representation has been decid' On the other hand, Shri (hat neither the reply has been fiied nor ^d by the respondent authorities. Dubey, leamed counselappearing for the merits of the case, in the opi served ifa direction is given t within a period of five days competent authority and on ^fElfe^I-TOTOf •3 fe'Zt t)W?T( , ^ ^m sn^i submit the reply by 3-4-2006 and in the State,contended that ifthe r^presentationssubmitted by the petitioners are not decided the same will t(e deeided within-.a period often days. Having considered an<} without expressing any opinion on the |iion of this Court, ends ofjustiee will be the petitioners to make statutory appeals ]from the date of th'is order before the such statutory appeai being filed, the competent authorjty shall d?cide the same on its own merits in accordance with iaw as early a|s possiblepreferablywithina period often days from the date of receipt 4f statutory appeal. It is made ciear that if any grievance stiii remains, the] petitioners may avail the remedy available underthelaw. With the aforesaid obs^rvations and directions the writ petitions No.1313/2006,1314/2006 & 1^15/20Q6 stand disposed of. Consequentiy, pending ^pplications, if any^ aiso stand djsposed of. Copy of this order be [^laced on the r.ecord of writ petitioris No. 1313/2006,1314/2006 & 131542006. Certified copy as per rui^s. CopytoStatecounsei. | Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [•qra'sfe^