IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 10TH OCTOBER 2011 / 18TH ASWINA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 799 of 2011(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.30826/2010 Dated 10/12/2010 .................... PETITIONER: IST PETITIONER & POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER OF 2 TO IN WRIT PETITION NO. 30826/2010 M.V.RAMADASAN, S/O.PARUKUTTIAMMA, CHERAKKATTUKUNNATHUKALAM, KARAKKURISSI P.O. BY ADV. SRI.K.ANAND RESPONDENT(S): 6TH RESPONDENT - JOY THOMAS (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), TAHSILDAR, OTTAPPALAM TALUK. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT M.J.RAJASHREE THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MM Con.Case(C).No. 799 of 2011(S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 10-12-2011 IN WP(C) NO.30826/2010 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT ANNEXURE B COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE FOREST DIVISIONAL OFFICER NO:T-7454/2010 (OA 782/75 & 783/75 DATED NIL ANNEXURE C COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE FOREST DIVISIONAL OFFICER NO:T-7454/2010 (OA 782/75 & 783/75 DATED NIL ANNEXURE D COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE FOREST DIVISIONAL OFFICER NO:A10 A-555/76 & 556/76 DATED NIL ANNEXURE E COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE FOREST DIVISIONAL OFFICER NO:A1O A -555/76 & 556/76 DATED NIL ANNEXURE F COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT DATED 02-07-2011 RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE MM ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... C.O.C.799/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 10th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT Petitioner submits that though the land, which was the subject matter of W.P.(C).30826/2010, was restored to him, pursuant to the directions contained in Annexure-A judgment, tax in respect of the land is not accepted by the respondents. It is alleging that the said conduct amounts to willful disobedience of the judgment, this C.O.C has been filed. 2. Learned Government Pleader, who has obtained instructions, submits that on 17.8.2011, the additional Tahsildar, Ottappalam, has informed the office of the learned Advocate General that instructions have already been issued to the Village Officer on 1.8.2011 to accept tax in respect of the property. Now that the said instructions have been issued, it is clarified that it will be open to the petitioner to appear before the Village Officer and pay tax in respect of the property covered by the judgment. C.O.C is closed accordingly. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs