MC 1555/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY Heard Mr. D. Goswami, learned counsel appearing for the applicant (respondent No .5). Also heard Mr. B.C. Das, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the responden t (writ petitioner). This application is filed for recall of the interim order dated 21.12.2009 passe d by this Court, whereby as an interim measure, it was directed that if no order has been passed for placement for the bullet-proof vehicles, the same shall not be passed in the mean time. Mr. Goswami while moving the stay vacating application refers to an order passed by this Court on 4.5.2010 in Misc. Case 1097/2010, which is a connected case fo r the same procurement process of bullet proof vehicles and contends that this C ourt has already vacated the interim order passed on 21.12.2009 in that case, af ter holding that Court should not come in the way of procuring the bullet proof vehicles or implementation of the decision of the purchase committee. The learned counsel appearing for the O.P. (writ petitioner) was also the counse l in the said proceeding where interim order was vacated on 4.5.2010 and was rep resenting the very same party. Having regard to the stay vacating order passed on 4.5.2010, I am inclined to pa ss a similar order in this case on the same reasons. Accordingly the interim order passed by this Court on 21.12.2009 stands recalled . Misc. Case stands allowed accordingly.