1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 34. WP/4604/2009 ( SAMPAT S/O. BHAU YEOLE AND ANR. V/S BHASKAR S/O. RAMA GUNJAL AND ORS.) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. N.C.Garud, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. V.B.Anjanwatikar, Adv., for respondent nos. 1 to 4. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:15/10/2010 1. Heard Mr. N.C.Garud, learned counsel, extensively. The learned Sub Divisional Officer, while negating contentions of the petitioners, for an access has basically harped on non compliance of procedure of a plaint requiring affidavit or verification. The learned Sub Divisional Officer has also observed about the influence being exerted by the local Member of Legislative Assembly. Mr.Garud, learned Counsel, is allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the learned Tehsildar by presenting an appropriate petition 2 under the Statute as is permitted. For such exercise, the observation of the learned Sub Divisional Officer, subject of challenge, will not come in the way of the said Court. Learned Tehsildar will decide any presentation of the petitioner on its own merits by giving opportunity to the concerned. Writ Petition allowed to be withdrawn. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/4604-09wp