1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5053 OF 2009 Ashokrao s/o Raosaheb Deshmukh ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others. ... Respondents. -------- Smt. M.A. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri.S.K. Tambe, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATE: 24th NOVEMBER 2009 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has sold 10 acres of land for establishment of Sub Market Committee at Ghatnandur. After formation of Parali Taluka, the Ghatnandur Sub Market Committee is not 2 functioning. The petitioner seeks revival of the same. 3) It is for the Government or the main Market Committee to take appropriate decision for establishment of sub Market Committees in view of the provisions of the A.P.M.C. Act. In exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, we do not find that writ could be issued for creation of Sub Market Committee. 4) It is informed that the petitioner has filed a writ petition challenging the auction of the said land over which the Ghatnandur Sub Market Committee was being run. 5) The writ petition is disposed of. (K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.5053.09