SiJN;^1 ^ ilK^pf^jM- ^ 'E ^ ^ ^^ i^ l.ri ^'k/- ^'! ® c ^^^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W. P. (S) No. 7g> / "^ PETmONERS ^./ ^/y/ .^M/"" ^•^y v>' ^^'^ ^'./:K.. '<f;"^' ,G<. ^^o^ ^'^f^ c^ ^- 1. Beniram Tandon, S/o. Shri Darash Ram Tandon, aged about 48 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School - Sumedha, Block - Katghora, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) 2. Govind Prasad Soni, S/o. Shri Ishwar Prasad Soni, aged about 46 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle Schoot - Sumedha Block - Katghora, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT'S ., 1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary Department of Education D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) , 2. District Education Officer, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) 3. Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department Distt- Korba(C.G.) ,4. Block Education Officer, Block - Katghora, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS. DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. -'r HI6H COURT OF CHHATHS6ARH AT BIL^SPUR W P.rS) No. 78 of 2007 Petitioners : Beniram Tondon and another Verajs Respondents : State of Chhattis9arh and olhers W. P.rSVNo. 79 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Usha Kaushal (Now Bhanu) Versus Re^aondents : State of Chhaftisgarh and olfiers W. ?.(S) No. 81 of 2007 Petitioner : Oevnath Pat Versus fte^ondents : State of ChhatKs9arh and others W. P.rS) No. 82 of 2007 Petitioner : Di9ediwar Lal fiopanti Verais Respondents : State of Chhatt'iS9arh and others SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present: Mr. A.S. Rajput, counsel for 1+ie petitioner(s). AAr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/re^tondents. ORDER (Passed on this 16th day of January, 2007) TTie following order of the Court js possed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners as w»ll as for 1+ie State/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petitions are similar to that of in W. P. No. 1463/2006 (Aeman Jain vs. The State Government of Chhatt-isgarii A another), wdiich was "5^) disposed of vide order dated 10.11.2006. They further submit that the question of bw involved is also +he same. 2. In view of the above stated submissions made by leamed counsel for the parties 1+iese writ petitions are disposed of terms of the order dated 10.11.2006 passed by this Court in 1463/2006 (Aeman Jain vs. The State Sovernment of Chhattisgarh & another), No order as to costs. Subhash Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge m^