mr' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTJSGARH AT BILASPUR yA,No.34/2007 M Singte Bench: ' Hon'bie Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshnnukh, J. t^, AppeSiant Defendant Respondent Pialntiff Shyam Sunder Agrawal, Son of Late Kesarimal Agarwal, aged about 60 years, Occupatlon- Business, resident of Purana Sadar Bazar, Kedar Gaii, 'District Raigarh (C.G.) Versvs Govlnd Kumar Mishra, son of Shri Damrudhar Mishra, aged about 46 years ,Occupation-Sen/ice, presentiy posted as Additionai District Judge, Korba Permanent resident of Kevtapara, Raigarh. Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 (ri of Civii Procedure Code.1908 Present:- None for the appeliant. (Passedont 8th Ju!y, 2007) No one appears for the appeiiant when the matter is cailed at 4 P.M. Earlier also when the matter was cailed, no one had appeared on behalf of the appeiiant. (2) The appeilant is aggrieved by an order dated 11-05-2007 passed by the District Judge, Raigarh in Civii Suit No.t-A/2007 whereby whi!e aliowing an appiication under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 of C.P.C. filed by the respondenVpiaJntiff, the Court beiow has oniy directed the appellant/defenyant not to aiienate the suit property. or create third party interest thereon till disposal of sult. 2, , ^ (3) On the iast date, !earned counsel for the appeliant was specifjcally asked as to whether the appeilant/defendant has any inclination to dispose of the suit property. Time was sought tii! today for making submission. (4) However, no one appears for the appeiiant. So far as the directions issued by the iower Court is concerned, no such infirmlty or iiiegaiity as wouid warrant any interference in thls appeal is seen. (5) in the resuit, this appeai being devoid of merit is dismissed at the admission stage. (6) in view of above, I.A.No.01 for stay also stands dismissed. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge