^ s c^ 'sr^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (C) N0. gc^0) /2010 ^ Ram Dev Gupta S/o Late Shri Mahendra Lal Gupta, aged about ^..••' ...•• 59 years, R/o 68/1, Arya Nagar, 3-° Garden, Durg Tahsil 85 Dista-ict Durg (C.G.) PETITIONER ^° ^•%^^ ^'^y ^-"'L/^>>y >••' ,;:* RESPONDENTS VERSUS 'l) Y' State of Chhattisgarh :Through The Secretary, Administration Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2) The Collector Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 3) The Tahsildar Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER_ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The_@etitioner_ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (C) No. 6049 of2010 PETITIONER : RamDevGupta. RESPOMDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WMT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIQNOF INDIA 1. Present: Sliri Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. i'hii N.N.Roy, Pane! Lawyer for the State/respondents. (Passsd on 22nd day of Octobei-, 2010) By this petition, the petitioner, who is an ex-amiy men, seeks a direction to the respondents to allot laad in his favo.ur. Amit 2. Tlie ideiitical issue came up fbr consideration before this Court in Chandrabhaii Bhatia v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others^, Vily.ch was disposed of by graiiting liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to fhe respondent autliorities. Iii the case on hand, representation has ali'eady been made on 06.08.2008 (Aimexure P/5), but till date, according to the petitioner, nothing has happened. 3. Accordmgly, the Collector, Durg, is directed to examine the application, as aforestated, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period ofthree months from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. ^.4. With the afbresaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. ~\ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge s "^M ES 3M W.P.(C)No. 5061 of 2008. decidedon 12.09.2009