1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5280 OF 2009 (Mahadeorao B. Bundele vs. Divisional Commissioner, Amravati & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DECEMBER 17, 2009. Heard Shri Deshmukh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Fulzele, learned AGP for respondents No. 1 & 2 and Shri J.B. Gandhi, learned counsel for respondent No.3. The impugned order dated 06.11.2009 permits Respondent No.3 to file on record documents in respect of meeting dated 25.02.2008. As the matter is made time bound, though no formal notice was issued and a copy of writ petition was served only on Respondent No.3 on last occasion, the matter is taken up for final hearing. It needs to be pointed out that as per earlier judgment of this Court dated 02.07.2009 in Writ Petition No. 2382 of 2009, the proceedings before the Commissioner are expedited. Because of reference in High Court judgment to a meeting dated 25.02.2008 in impugned order, Respondent No.1 has granted permission to produce documents in respect of meeting dated 25.02.2008. 2 With the assistance of respective counsel, I have perused said order as also the application on which that order has been passed. The perusal of application at Annexure – G at page 65 shows that it nowhere contains date 25.02.2008. Para 2 of said application mentions meeting dated 24.02.2008 and then in para 4 subsequent meeting dated 26.02.2008. In the list of documents accompanying it, it contains 10 documents, again there is no proceeding of meeting dated 25.02.2008. It is, therefore, apparent that the impugned order dated 06.11.2009 shows total non application of mind to the application. The order, therefore, cannot be sustained. The learned counsel for respondent No.3 has stated that Respondent No.3 should be given liberty to move appropriate application before Respondent No.1 in the matter. Respondent No.3 is always at liberty to move appropriate application. If such an application is moved, the same shall be considered by Respondent No. 1 on its own merit after giving appropriate opportunity to the parties appearing before it. The matter is already made time bound and parties shall cooperate with Respondent No.1 in getting it decided accordingly. Writ Petition is thus allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Copy of this order be furnished to the parties. JUDGE *GS.