IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1814 of 2010 Bharat Prasad, son of late Mahanth Sah, resident of Village-Saria Ward No.4 Yadopur Road, at, P.O. & P.S. Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj ---- Respondent no.5 --- Appellant. Versus 1. Yogendra Pandit, son of late Gokhula Pandit, resident of Village- Banjari Paragna Kuari Gopalganj, P.O. and P.S. Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj, --- Writ petitioner/Respondent. 2. The State of Bihar. 3. District Magistrate, Gopalganj. 4. Civil S.D. O., Gopalganj Sadar, District- Gopalganj. 5. Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj --- Respondents- Respondents. ------------- 3. 12.1.2011 In spite of repeated calls, no one appears for the appellant. Learned counsel for the State is present. Both interlocutory applications in the limitation matter and stay matter have been listed for consideration. The instant appeal has been preferred against the order dated 14.5.2010, passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 8263 of 2010, whereby the learned Sub-Ordinate Judge-I, Gopalganj has been directed to dispose of the petition filed by respondent no.5 under Order XIV Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Code within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The learned Single Judge further directed the learned court below to proceed to dispose of Eviction Suit No.2 of 2008 preferably 2 within a period of nine months from the date of disposal of the petition under Order XIV Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Code. We do not find any infirmity in the impugned order as this Court had merely directed for disposal of the petition as well as the suit expeditiously. Besides this, there is also delay of 129 days in filing the instant memo of appeal. The grounds mentioned in the limitation petition are not convincing. As such both the limitation matter as well as appeal are rejected. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar,J. ) ( S. P. Singh, J.)