In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CR No. 5240 of 2010 Decided on Sept 09,2010. Sarita --Petitioner vs. Municipal Council, Rewari through its President and others -- Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.N.S.Sekhawat,Advocate,for the petitioner Rakesh Kumar Jain, J,(Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 14.6.2010, passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) ,Rewari by which an application filed by the plaintiff/petitioner to lead evidence in rebuttal has been dismissed. Shorn of unnecessary details, the plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from demolishing their structure without authority of law. In the said suit, issues were framed on 23.4.2008 in which besides other issues, issue No.1 was to the effect that “whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of injunction as prayed for”? OPP. The other issues were to be proved by the defendants. After closure of the evidence by both the parties, the present application was filed by the petitioner/plaintiff to lead evidence in rebuttal. CR No.5240 of 2010 -2- It is well settled by a Division Bench of this Court that evidence in rebuttal cannot be led by the plaintiff on an issue which is to be proved by him. Therefore, the present application per-se is not maintainable. The plaintiff, if so, advised, may seek his remedy by filing an application for additional evidence. With this observation, this revision petition stands disposed of. Sept 09,2010 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge