IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40133 of 2008 ---- Veena Prasad wife of Raghubansh Prasad Verma, Circile Officer-cum-Block Development Officer, Bahadurpur, District Darbahnga …. Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar. …. Opposite Party. ----------- 2 29.09.2008 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused for the offence under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation in the first information report is to the effect that the money under the scheme Indira Awas Yojna was remitted by this petitioner to the concerned post office of Laheriasarai and the same was withdrawn by the officials at the Panchayat level and the money was allegedly not disbursed to the beneficiaries. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation against the petitioner with regard to withdrawal of money from the post office or disbursement. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case in course of investigation on the allegation that petitioner being the Circle Officer/ Block Development Officer ought to have verified the list of beneficiaries. - 2 - Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State is not in position to refute the above submissions. Having considered the submissions, as noticed, and in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, namely, Veena Prasad be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with BahadurPur Police Station Case No. 99 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under section subject to the condition as laid down under section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)