C.W.P. No. 9097 of 2010 [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 9097 of 2010 Date of Decision: July 29,2011 Rajbir Kaur ............................................ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ................... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Ranjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Kavita Arora, AAG, Punjab, for respondents No. 1 to 5. Ms. Naiya Gill, Advocate for respondent No.6. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) The instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India challenges the selection and appointment of respondent No. 6 as Anganwari worker and further issuance of direction to appoint the petitioner as Anganwari worker. C.W.P. No. 9097 of 2010 [ 2 ] It has remained undisputed that the claim made by the petitioner in the instant writ petition has already been sought by another candidate before another Bench of this Court in CWP No. 4799 of 2009 titled as Sukhdev Kaur vs. State of Punjab and others. The aforesaid petition was dismissed by placing reliance on the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in State of Karnataka and others vs. Ameerbi and others reported as 2007(1) SCC 681. Therefore, for the parity of reasoning, this petition is also dismissed in terms of the judgment dated 30.05.2001 rendered in CWP No. 4799 of 2009. 29.7.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE