IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 1907 of 2010 Date of decision: 04.03.2010 Harjinder singh alias Pappu and others ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. R P Dhir, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab for the respondent- State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab pointed out that on the date in question, petitioner No. 1 was not working at the Petrol Pump but he had access to the same on account of the fact that he is son of petitioner No. 2, who was working as Chowkidar at the Petrol Pump. As per the allegations in the FIR, petitioner No. 1 was found to be selling petrol in the village therefore, petitioner No. 1 is not entitled to the concession of anticipatory bail. However, petitioner No. 2 is 72 years of age, while no allegation has been levelled against petitioner No. 3 Accordingly, the order dated 21.01.2010 passed by this Court is made absolute qua petitioners No. 1 and 2 only. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge March 04, 2010 mohan