IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 17092 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: 27.07.2011 Nisha Gupta ..........Petitioner Versus Managing Committee, S.D. High School & Ors. ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Ramesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.S. Sethi, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for respondents No.3 to 5. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. In view of the objection raised by learned counsel for respondents no.1 and 2 that remedy of appeal is there as provided under Section 2 Sub clause 4 of the Punjab Aided Schools (Security of Service) Act, 1969, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail the remedy of appeal. He also prays for condonation of delay as the period of filing appeal is thirty days. Dismissed as withdrawn with the said liberty. As far as limitation period is concerned, the petitioner is at liberty to take grounds by way of moving an application for condonation of delay. The appellate authority is also directed to consider the prayer of the petitioner sympathetically keeping in view the remedy availed before this Court under wrong presumption. July 27, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE Note:-Whether this case is to be referred to the Reporter .......Yes/No