IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14661 of 2010 QUAYAM KHAN @ MD. KAIM KHAN, S/o Late Rauf Khan. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.15846 of 2010 1. MD. RAGEEB KHAN @ MD. RAGHIB KHAN. 2. Md. Kadir Khan. Both are sons of Quayum Khan. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 23.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 379, 504, 384 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. In the First Information Report even though there is an allegation that the accused persons extorted money from the son of the informant but during investigation the same has not been found true and therefore charge-sheet was submitted only under Sections 364 and 511 IPC. Considering the same, let the petitioners, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Mahesh Khut P.S. Case No. 141 of 2009 2 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)