IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT FRIDAY, THE 27TH JUNE 2008 / 6TH ASHADHA 1930 Crl.MC.No. 2086 of 2008() ------------------------- CC.321/2006 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, PAYYANNUR CRIME NO.14 OF 2006 OF PAYYANNUR POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONER: ACCUSED ------------------- 1. K.RAVEENDRAN, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, KRISHNA NIVAS, KOLATHINKAL, KARADUKKA P.O, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 2. KRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 68 YEARS, S/O.CHINDAN, KRISHNA NIVAS, KOLATHINKAL, KARADUKKA P.O, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 3. K.AMMALU AMMA, AGED 62 YEARS, W/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, KRISHNA NIVAS, KOLATHINKAL, KARADUKKA P.O, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 4. K.NEELAKANDAN, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, NEAR JAI MATHA SCHOOL, ULUYATHADUKKA, P.O MANDHOOR. 5. VARIJAKSHAN, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, 'CHAITHANYA', SANTHI NAGAR, P.O. KARADUKKA, KASARAGOD. 6. VIJAYA NIRMALA.K, AGED 42 YEARS, W/O.DAMODHARAN, 'MIDHUNAM;, SANTHI NAGAR, P.O. KARADUKKA, KASARAGOD. 7. K.SHYLAJA, W/O.VINOD KUMAR, 'JYOTHISH', PARAVANADUKKAM, P.O.KARADUKKA, KASARAGOD. 8. SUDHAKSHI.K, AGED 32 YEARS, W/O.GOPINATH, 'ANJANA', P.O., PERUMBALA, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.R.PADMAKUMARI RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. DEEPA.K.V, AGED 22 YEARS, D/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN, "SREEPALAM", NEAR KISAN GROUND, VELLUR AMSOM, ANNUR, P.O. VELLUR, KANNUR. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.GIKKU JACOB SMT.R.DYANA FOR R2 THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT, J ------------------------------------ Crl.M.C. No.2086 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of June, 2008 ORDER The 2nd respondent is present before the Court. Investigating Officer has appeared before the Court as directed. The Investigating Officer reports that the 2nd respondent asserts that the matter has not been settled. The 2nd respondent was called before the Court. The 2nd respondent in reply to a specific query by the Court gives an unambiguous answer that she has not settled the disputes with the petitioners. 2. I accept the statement of the 2nd respondent that she has not settled the disputes. This Crl.M.C cannot, in these circumstances, be entertained favourably. 3. This Crl.M.C is, in these circumstances, dismissed. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) rtr/-