IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.33874-M of 2009 Date of Decision:10.8.2010 Harbans Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. H.S. Sangha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Vakeel Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of order dated 5.11.2009 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Bathinda, whereby respondent No.2 was allowed to go abroad subject to her reporting to the concerned Court on or before 31.3.2010. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from HC Satpal Singh states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as respondent No.2 has already gone abroad. However, it is pointed out that she did not report as directed vide order dated 5.11.2009. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. However, in case, respondent No.2 has not complied with the order dated 5.11.2009, the trial Court may proceed against her in accordance with law. 10.8.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE