IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38311 of 2007 1. REENA KUMARI @ RAJA 2. RANI KUMARI 3. RAVI KUMAR JAISWAL @ PAPPU 4. RANA KUMAR, ALL THE DAUGHTER AND SONS OF MADAN GOPAL JAISWAL, RESIDENT OF ROOPGANJ RAHAT ROAD OLD WARD NO.8 P.S. TOWN(CHAPRA) DISTRICT CHAPRA …PETITIONERS Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. ABHA DEVI D/O LAXMI NARAYAN JAISWAL RESIDENT OF GOVINDPUR, P.S. FATUHA DISTRCIT PATNA. …OPPOSITEP PARTIES For the Petitioners : Mr. Sunil Kr. Pathak For O.P. : Mr.Chitragupta Prasad For the State : Mr.R.S.Chaudhary, APP ----------- 03. 12.08.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioners. Petitioners have challenged the order dated 02.03.2006 passed by learned SDJM, Patna City by which the trial court rejected the application of the accuseds filed under section 239 Cr.P.C. seeking discharge. Learned SDJM as well as the learned Addl. Sessions Judge have found that there is more than sufficient evidence justifying the order. Learned revisional court while rejecting their application, found as under in paragraph 5. “5. From perusal of statement of witnesses and documents referred above I find that there are sufficient material on record to show that the informant was tortured and harassed in connection with demand of dowry by all accused persons. These evidences, if remain unrebutted may warrant conviction and accordingly I find that there are sufficient material on record to frame charge u/s 498A/34 2 IPC and the order of learned S.D.J.M. Patnacity is just and proper.” In my view, orders passed by both the courts below cannot be said to be patently illegal justifying any interference. There is no merit in this application which is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )