IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6999 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision 04.03.2011 Meenakshi ...... Petitioner VERSUS Vijay Kumar ...... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.Vishal Sharma, Advocate, for Ms.G.K.Mann, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Vikas Bahl, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J: Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 12.10.2010, passed by the District Judge, Nawanshahar, allowing the application moved by the respondent, for recording the voice of petitioner for comparison by Voice Expert. Learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions of respondent Vijay Kumar, has stated at bar that he has no objection for setting aside the impugned order as there is already sufficient evidence on the file to prove the plea set by the respondent. In the wake of aforesaid statement, this petition is accepted and the impugned order is set aside. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 04.03.2011 mamta-II