THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.S. APPA RAO A.S. Nos. 1640 and 2739 of 2001 and A.S. Nos. 1030 and 1764 of 2004 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per NVR,J) Against the common orders dated 30.10.2000 passed in L.A.O.P. No. 7 of 1996 and batch, the Land Acquisition Officer and Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), Port Development, Kakinada, filed the appeals in A.S. Nos. 1640 and 2739 of 2001, while the claimants filed A.S. Nos. 1030 and 1764 of 2004. The appeals in A.S. Nos. 1640 and 2739 of 2001 relate to O.P. Nos. 7 and 14 of 1996, and the appeals in A.S. Nos. 1030 and 1764 of 2004 relate to O.P. Nos. 11 and 7 of 1996. Today, when the matters are taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Appeals as well as the learned counsel appearing for the claimants submitted that a batch of appeals being A.S. No. 1602 of 2001 and batch, filed against the orders of the reference Court passed in similar O.Ps., arising out of the same acquisition proceedings, were already dismissed by this Court, by common judgment dated 29.12.2006, confirming the fixation of market value at Rs. 1,00,000/- per acre, and following the same, the appeal being A.S. No. 2743 of 2001 filed by the Land Acquisition Officer, against the order in O.P. No. 11 of 1996, which is under challenge in the present A.S. No. 1030 of 2004 filed by the claimant, was also dismissed on 16.03.2007. In the circumstances, we see no reason to interfere with the orders under appeal, either enhancing or reducing the compensation awarded by the reference Court. Therefore, the appeals are liable to be dismissed. The appeals are accordingly dismissed for the reasons recorded in the judgment dated 29.12.2006 passed in A.S. No. 1602 of 2001 and batch, a copy of which shall be annexed while communicating this order. No costs. __________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA ___________________ JUSTICE K.S. APPA RAO 4th July, 2011 IBL