»a. Appellant : 1. Ajay Pandey, S/o. Dr. Ramnarayan Pandcy, L1G 256, Padmanabhpur Durg (C.G.) 2. Ramnaxayan Pandey, S/o. K.S.Pandey, L1G 256, Padmanabhpur, Dm‘g (C.G.). ’ ’ERSUS Respondents : 1 U.Tamaiyya, S/o. Shri V. Ramaswamy, aged 44 years, msident of Khursipar Zone 2, Gayatri Mandir ke pass, Bhjlai, Distu’ct Durg (CG) 12.04.2007 Dr. Sanjit Shanna, counsel for‘thc appellant. The appellant h pmfeued this appeal against the impugned award dated 2 ”I ofJanuary 2004 passed by learned 8th Additional Motor Acc ent Claims Tribunal (FTC), Durg in Claim Case No. 45/2002 whexeby the award of Rs. 11,846]— has been passed in fav of the xespondents/claimants. The matter is listed, on default for non Eing of receipt of the awaxded amount as er Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act. Even after three y of himg of this appeal the appellant has failed to furnish recei t. Therefore this appeal is dismissed for non Eing of receipt t aids the mandatory deposit under Section 173 of the Motor ehicles Act.’ ' v Sd/— DHmENDRA ,MlSl‘m Judge (diew) a e o A