IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13690 of 2011 Ramdeo Singh Versus Rajendra Singh & Ors ---------------------------------- 02. 24.08.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. This application under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been filed against the order dated 02.06.2011 passed by Munsif Ist Court, Hajipur, Vaishali in Title Suit No.41 of 2005 whereby the learned Court below allowed the application filed by the plaintiff-respondent praying for comparing the disputed signature and L.T.I. of Panchu Singh on the disputed sale deed dated 20.01.1973 and directed that Panchu Singh, the respondent No.2 shall give his sample signature in the Court and L.T.I. so that it may be sent for comparison to the expert. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the learned Court below should not have allowed the application and alternatively submitted that even if it is allowed then the same shall be compared with another sale deed executed by Panchu Singh on 28.07.1982. Admittedly, the signature and L.T.I. of respondent No.2 appearing on the sale deed of the year 1973 is disputed by the plaintiff-respondent. - 2 - The said Panchu Singh is respondent No.2, therefore, the learned Court below considering this fact directed that Panchu Singh shall give his signature and L.T.I. which shall be sent to expert for comparison. In my opinion, the order passed of the Court below is within the bounds of its authority and, therefore, in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)