IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 586 OF 2008 SHRI. DILIP D. DHUMASKAR ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA BY ITS SECRETARY (LAW) AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Agnelo F. Diniz, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Govt. Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. A. Kamat, Addl. Govt. Advocate for respondent No.2. Coram:- P. B. MAJMUDAR & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 30th March, 2009 P.C. The only prayer in this petition is in connection with deciding the representation of the petitioner. The High Court has already decided the representation of the petitioner in its administrative side and that decision has been upheld by the State. In view of the the decision of the State upholding the decision of the High Court, the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition, with a view to challenge the decision taken by the High Court on the representation of the petitioner. Permission granted. Petition stands disposed off as withdrawn, subject to liberty to challenge the decision of the High Court on its Administrative side with other ancillary reliefs. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. U. D. SALVI, J. ssm.