IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15477 of 2009 1. ANUJ KUMAR UPADHAYAY @ RAMANUJ UPADHAYAY 2. Mira Devi 3. Kamla Pathak 4. Bhushan Pathak 5. Daya Shankar Pathak 6. Sheo Prakash Pathak @ Chhotelal Pathak Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 05.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners no.1 and 2 have been alleged for taking the complainant for medical treatment but got executed a deed in favour of petitioner no.2 who is none else but niece of the complainant. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners no. 3 to 6 have not been made any allegation, while after complaint case, Title Suit was also filed by the complainant making a different story, rather going to registry office for execution of the Power of Attorney and three deeds simultaneously executed there. However, their grievances will be subsided only by the Civil Court, even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 1481 of 2007, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Bhabhua subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)