IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 2576 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:- 03.10.2011 Nirmal Kumar ...Appellant Versus Kuljit Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Dr. Surya Prakash, Advocate for the appellant. RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) Challenge is to the judgment dated 22.08.2008 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mansa and judgment dated 10.09.2009 passed by the Additional District Judge, Mansa whereby suit for recovery of ` 2,15,600/- has been decreed. The execution of pronote and receipt in dispute has been proved by the plaintiff by examining PW1, PW2 Maghar Singh and PW3 Kishan Singh. PW1 Kuldeep Singh in his affidavit Ex. PW1/A has stated that the pronote has been executed by the defendant. The finger prints and hand writing expert DW2 VB Bhatnanagar has been examined and both the Courts have held that since he does not have any degree, diploma or certificate of any recognized university relating to the field of Forensic Science, therefore, it cannot be held that the pronote bears material addition or alteration. No substantial question of law arises for consideration in this appeal by this Court. Accordingly, R.S.A is dismissed. October 03, 2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) G.Arora JUDGE