1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 735 OF 2005 Sambhaji s/o Dhuraji Garje ... Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others ... Respondents. ----- Shri. S.M. Vibhute, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri. S.K. Tambe, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondents nos.1,3 and 4. Shri. S.M. Zarkar, Advocate holding for Shri. H.K. Munde, for respondent No.2. ------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE: 17th JUNE 2009 PER COURT : 1) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been reinstated by the management. 2 2) In the light of the statement made by the learned counsel, we do not find at this stage any case to interfere in the matter in exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In case, in future, the petitioner has any grievances he may resort to appropriate remedies. 3) The writ petition is dismissed. (N.D. DESHPANDE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.735.05