1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 849 of 2011 Kamal Singh S/o Late Murari Lal R/o House no. 22, Sector 13 Basundhara, Police Station Indira Puram Ghaziabad …..…Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Principal Secretary Department of Home, Civil Secretariat, Dehradun 2. Inspector, Crime Branch Central Investigating Department, Meerut Circle, Meerut Uttar Pradesh 3. Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation (UPFC) 76, Rajpur Road, through its Regional Manager ……….Respondents Ms. Menka Tripathi, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A., present for the State. Mr. Naresh Pant, Advocate, present for the respondent no. 3 Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2. By means of this petition moved under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.P.C.) the petitioner has sought quashing of the proceedings of criminal case no. 1585 of 2008, C.B.C.I.D. vs. Indra Lal Khatri & 2 others, relating to offences punishable under 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C., pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun. 3. Respondent no. 3 U.P. Finance Corporation (for short U.P.F.C.) is a creditor. Learned counsel for respondent no. 2 states before this Court that though the criminal proceedings were set in motion on the request of U.P.F.C., but since the amount of loan has been repaid to U.P.F.C., and matter has been settled, as such, U.P.F.C. is no more interested to prosecute the petitioner. 4. However, the offences are not compoundable, nor any application for plea bargaining under Chapter XXIA of Cr.P.C., was moved by the accused before the trial court. 5. In the above circumstances, this Court is not inclined to quash the proceedings, and the petition is disposed of summarily with the observation that if the accused makes any application for plea bargaining before the trial court, the court may proceed in the light of provisions contained in Chapter XXIA (section 3 265A to 265L) of Cr.P.C., to do complete justice between the parties as matter has already been settled between the accused and U.P.F.C. (complainant). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Parul 16.09.2011