1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.659/2010 Muhammad Salim Muhammad Iqbal & Ors. Petitioners Vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce Respondent Mr.H.S.Venegaonkar for the petitioner Ms.P.H.Kantharia,APP for State Mr.Anant Narayan for Respondent Bank CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI, & SMT.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE : 26th FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C. . The appropriate remedy for the petitioner is to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal under section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,2002 .Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal within a period of one week. Needless to say if an application is filed, Debts Recovery Tribunal will pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law . We make it clear that we have not considered the merits of the case. 2] Learned counsel for the first respondent says that without prejudice to the first respondent’s rights and contentions 2 the first respondent shall not take any further steps for a period of 10 days from today. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner shall not create any third party interest in the concerned property during the said period. These statements are accepted. We make it clear that no further time will be granted by the Court. Appropriate orders may be obtained by the petitioner from the Debts Recovery Tribunal . We again make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The Debts Recovery Tribunal shall consider any application made by the petitioner independently . 3] Petition is disposed of. (Smt.Ranjana Desai,J.) (Smt.Mridula Bhatkar,J.)