IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3197 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO --------------------------------------------------------- CADILA WORKERS' UNION Versus STATE OF GUJARAT --------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: M/S NJ MEHTA ASSO. for Petitioner No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner No. 1 Mr.R.V.Desai, Assistant GOVERNMENT PLEADER, for Respondent No. 1 MR KS NANAVATI for Respondent No. 2-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 04/09/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.Shalin Metha, learned Advocate for the petitioner states that the Union has settled their dispute with the Management. Mr.Mehta therafter also further submitted that since the life of the so-called settlement is also over, the petition has practically become infructuous and, therefore, nothing further is required to be done in this matter in view of the settlement between the Union and the Management. He, therefore, wants to withdraw this petition. He also further submits that in case of difficulty, the petitioner may be allowed to apply for revival of the petition. Permission to withdraw the petition is granted. This petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to revive the petition in case of difficulty. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. 4th September, 2001 ( P.B. Majmudar, J. ) **** (apj)