IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.171 of 2009 1. Md. Muzaffar Ali. 2. Md. Asgar Ali, both S/o Abdul Slam, R/o Village-Pothia Ghat, P.S. Mansahi, Distt. Katihar. --------- Plaitiffs-Appellants Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Executive Engineer R.E.O., Katihar. 3. B.D.O. Katihar Anchal, Katihar. ------ Defendants/Respondents ----------- 3 27.4.2009 Heard counsel for the appellants. In the opinion of this Court, the dispute in the suit is squarely covered with regard to the plot no. 3395. The findings of the court below while considering the prayer of injunction of the plaintiffs/appellants is that such construction of bridge is being made on plot no. 3359. In that view of the matter, this Court is not impressed with the alternative submission made by the learned counsel for the appellants that the concrete bridge and approaching road was being constructed in which the plot no. 3395 was used and the State of Bihar and authorities have tried to usurp the plot no. 3395. This Court has perused the injunction petition and it does not find a word mentioned there about it. In that view of the matter, 2 this Court would find no reason to interfere with the impugned order refusing to grant injunction. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed but it will be open for the plaintiffs/appellants to protect their plot no. 3395 if need be even by filing another application for injunction. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)