1 cra644 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.644 OF 2011 Usha Surreshchandra Bhatta & Ors. ...Applicants vs. Sonal Bhimsingh Krishna Roopnarayan Singh ...Respondent Mr.P.M.Shah and D.S.Jain for the applicants None for the respondents CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : NOVEMBER 23, 2011 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the revision applicant. By the impugned order, application made by the applicants-original plaintiffs for appointment of Court Commissioner for local investigation has been rejected. 2 Obviously, the revision application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 is not maintainable against the impugned order. Even if the revision application is converted into a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the same will come up before this Court. Hence, I have heard the learned counsel for the applicants on merits. 3 The impugned order is purely interlocutory in nature. Moreover, at any stage of the proceedings, if the Trial Court is of the view that the 2 cra644 appointment of the Court Commissioner is necessary, the Trial Court can exercise power under Order XVI of the said Code notwithstanding the impugned order. 4 Subject to what is observed above, the Revision Application is rejected. JUDGE