IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.915 of 2010 MUNNILAL CHAUDHARY D/O BUJHAWAN CHAUDHARY OF VILLAGE BAKHARI TOLA, NONIMAL, P.S. RAJEPUR, DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN, PRESENT ADDRESS VILLAGE KASBA MEHSI, P.S. (RESPONDENT IN THE COURT BELOW) ….. APPELLANT Versus 1. SMT. KUSUMI DEVI WIFE OF LATE VISHWANATH CHAUDHARY, D/O RAMCHANDRA CHAUDHARY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BAKHARI TOLA, NONIMAL, P.O. NONIMAL, P.S. RAJEPUR, DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN, AT PRESENT ADDRESS OF KASBA, MEHSI, DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN (APPELLANT IN THE COURT BELOW) 2. PUNAM KUMARI MINOR DAUGHTER OF LATE VISHWANATH CHAUDHARY OF VILLAGE KASBA MEHSI, P.O. AND P.S. MEHSI, DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN 3. SUPERINTENDENT R.M.S.U. DIVISION MUZAFFARPUR RAILWAY MAIL SERVICE DIVISION MUZAFFARPUR, P.S. MUZAFFARPUR, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR (RESPONDENTS IN THE COURT BELOW) …. RESPONDENTS ----------- 3. 6.12.2010 The appellant is aggrieved by the order/judgment dated 27.3.2010 passed by the Additional District Judge, F.T.C.4th, East Champaran, Motihari in Certificate case No.17 of 1998 granting succession certificate to respondent no.2 i.e. Punam Kumari. The appellant is also aggrieved by the observations made in the judgment whereby he has decided the question finally. In my view all the other extraneous observations can be ignored since there is no doubt that the respondent no.2 is the class I heir of the deceased. In view of such, this appeal is dismissed. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )