- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Appeal No.297 of 2007 In Notice of Motion No.4249 of 2006 In Suit No.347 of 2001 Vivek Krishnarao Kandivalikar & Anr. .. Appellants Vs. Vinda Pradeep Kirtikar & Ors. .. Respondents -- Shri Hetal Thakore i/b M/s.Thakore Jariwala & Associates for the appellants. Shri Chirag Balsara i/b Haresh Mehta & Co. for the respondent No.1. Shri Sandesh Deshpande for the respondent Nos.2 to 4. -- CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & D.G.KARNIK, JJ DATED : 27TH APRIL, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. Undisputedly, the impugned order is an ad-interim order and the notice of motion is still pending for disposal before the Learned Single Judge. Needless to say that all the observations made in the impugned order are only for the purpose of disposal of the application for ad-interim reliefs and shall not - 2 - influence the Learned Single Judge while deciding the Notice of Motion No.4249 of 2006 on merits. Liberty to the parties to move for expeditious disposal of the said motion. 2. With the above observations, no further interference is called for in the impugned order, the appeal is disposed of. (R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J) ( D.G.KARNIK, J)