F Jfs ^z HIGIICOUKTOFCMHA't'TISGARHi&TBUJ^PUR PETTnOKER RESPONDENTS W.P.(Sino.e803of2QOT Jogestiwar Vadav S/®Shrl Bliilctiaii Y^ayagedabout45.^ajs,R^oBadi Koni, BiFkona. M^ra, Bilaspur (C.Q.) Versus.""": -. ,::'. ; ''': ';.; 1... 1> State df Ctlliattisgarh ThTciugh.:- Secretaiy; Department bf PubIiG Works, Dau. Katvaii;Sulgh Bhawan, :''Raipur:(C,G,) '.:; •' ,; . ••. •: ;; v 2. 15ngmeer-u^GlMri^ ft^ Department Raipur (C.G.) 3. ExeGutiwe Engiaeer,^^^^P^ 'Wor'ks, Departirieut Pa.tflia^acat, Jashptir 1(C.G.).-',: •.."•. •'•-,:.-:::/:::.;1: WRIT PEmTIQK BBn^BRA.R'I'ICM; 326 OP THB ••^'^'eOBSTI'FOiraOKieRlNDIA/ '::: .•:':':',; • :':? Preseace: . •, '; ;. ..;:.:' ^ . :. • • ;, Shri S.P. Kale, counselfbrthepetitioner. B4s. Suiuta Jaui, Panel I^awver, for the State on ailwaiice copy- ..'1 .'..•. ...::. :-• ;. 1: ; \ . -•:. • .: • •• ORAX-ORDER. ! . .: :: 1. ','\ :'. !/ (IT.ll.iZOOT) SUWIt KUMAR SIMHA. J. Heanl finalty wifh the consent of the piarties. Leanaed counsel fcr fhe petitioner submzts that ftle petitioiier wasappoinAedpriorto 31.13.1988 and afpresent, he is worlang as a daily wages emplp}^ im Puhljc Wdrtes Department (PWI^ at J'atthalgaon; f?e a^ sul'inuts fhat fhe petitioiier has filed fhis petition pra^ng 1ar a.rel^^^^ the judgmfint ahd onier passed bythfi Suprei^ case of Secretary, State of^Kaji'natate arui Ofhers ^. Um^e^ (3) and Ofhers aDd. Mineral Exploi'atjon Corporatioa Etnployees' IJnionVs. Miiieral Exploratfon GotporaHoiz LiiniteS & The Sllpreine Gourt in the ease of Secretaiy, Stete of Karnatakaand Others (supi^, in para53 BasheM ss iii^ <n53. ....... Tl^t^estionofTRgylarization pFthe services of siich emplojrees Inay Uave to Ue Gonsidered pn meiits in thje 1ight 6f fhe prmGiptes settteil by fhis Court in Ihe casesabosereferredtdaridTa'fhfilighl^^c^ In tttat conteXt, the Union of Irulia, tUe State K;r 2». -»-= W.P.(S)No. 6803 uf2007 GoVeminents aad their ihstnunentalifies shoiitd take steps to regularize as a one-tutie nieasure, the services of sucli UTegularly appointed, who liave worked for ten years or more in d^uty sarK^ned posts but not under cover pf orders of the courts or of tribunals arid should ftlrther ensure fhat regular iBcniitinents are undertateen^to those vacant sancttonGd ppsts fhat require to be filled up, in cases •CT;here teuiporaiy emLployees or daily wagers are bei.ng now employed. The process niust. be set in niotipn within SHC ittontlis fi-otd t.his date. We also clariQr tihat regylarization, if any already •made, but notsub 'judice, need. not be reopened based pn this judgment, but thel'e shduld be no furfher bypassing pf &C constitutiorial requireinent aad regularizuig ormakingpemianent, fhose not duty appointed as perthe constitutional scheine." Haviag faeard leamed counsel for ttie parties, having regard to tiie facts and circuinstanGes of tlie case and wittout expressuig any opituon on •mertts ofthecase, the request raade by learned counscl for tJae petitioner is allowed, which appears to be just, fair and reasonabte. Therefbre, fhe petitioner is allowed to xnake a detailed Tepresentation, raising aU his grievanc«s annexiag a eopy of the writ petition and its annfixures te the conceni^ aufhfirity wit^ii a weeks froiu today and tfae coiieenied aut.tiorily is directed to decide the representation at the earliest, in an objective inaaner, pn its own xnerits, in accQidalice witli law, However, th.is shall be subject to werification of docuinentsreganling appouitme.nt df the petitioner prior to 31.12.1988, which he llas claiined in luswrit petition. Sd/- SuailKumarSinha Judge vatti