Patna High Court CWJC No.64 of 2010 (5) dt.18-10-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.64 of 2010 ====================================================== Radha Devi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinesh Kr.Sahay Mr. Arvind Kr.Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp15) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA) 5 18-10-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the application with regard to the aforesaid Pramila Devi. There is no occasion for the Court to consider the claims of the petitioner in contest with said Pramila Devi. Shri Dinu Kumar, advocate for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has been working as a daily wager since 1982, but has not been regularized alleging that persons appointed after her have been so done. Learned counsel for the State disputes that the petitioner was working part time and not on daily wage. Whether the petitioner was working as a daily wager or part timer is hardly relevant as both cannot have a claim for Patna High Court CWJC No.64 of 2010 (5) dt.18-10-2011 regularization by induction in service directly. If what the petitioner claims be correct, whether she be a daily wager or part timer and her services are being utilized in that capacity since 1982, that itself may be more than sufficient indication of the need for regular personnel. The respondent State cannot resort to any subterfuge in such circumstances by continuing such ad hoc arrangement since long years since 1982 as alleged. Let the respondents consider the desirability of creating and/or filling up such regular vacancy if it exists in accordance with law within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Considering long years for which the petitioner has been working, the respondents are prudently expected to consider issues of age relaxation and weightage for past work experience as a matter of policy. The writ application is disposed. Krishna Chandra Jha/- (Navin Sinha, J)