IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN FRIDAY, THE 15TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 26TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 5581 of 2008(M) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------- P.A.VASUDEVAN, AGED 48, S/O.P.G.ANANTHAN NAIK, RESIDING AT POZHAMANGALATH HOUSE, KOVILVATTOM ROAD, EARNAKULAM.682035. BY ADV. SRI.PAUL K.VARGHESE RESPONDENTS: ------------ 1. COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, TRICHUR-1, REPRESENTED ;BY ITS SECRETARY, COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD, DEVASWOM BOARD BUILDINGS, TRICHUR-1. 2. DEVASWOM OFFICER, ERNAKULAM SIVA TEMPLE, ERNAKULAM. 3. ERNAKULAM KSHETHRA KSHEMA SAMITHY, ERNAKULAM SIVA TEMPLE, ERNAKULAM REPRSENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ERNAKULAM KSHETHRA KSHEMA SAMITHY, DEVASWOM BUILDINGS, ERNAKULAM SIVA TEMPLE, KOCHI-11. 4. K.K.RAMACHANDRAN, S/O.MADHAVY WARRIASSIAN, PRESIDENT, ERNAKULAM KSHETHRA KSHEMA SAMITHY, ERNAKULAM SIVA TAMPLE, KOCHI-11 NOW RESIDING AT KRIPA, WAQRRIAM ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-16. R1 BY SRI K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP, SC FOR CDB. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMAN & V. K. MOHANAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) NO. 5581 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2008. J U D G M E N T Raman, J. The grievance of the petitioner is that the complaint preferred by him before Respondents 1 to 3 as evidenced by Ext.P3 has not been considered so far. Ext.P3 is dated 28.10.2007. 2. Learned standing counsel Sri. Kurup appearing for the Board submits that Ext.P3 complaint will be considered and disposed of in accordance with law, after hearing all the parties, expeditiously. 3. In the circumstances, we direct the Board to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 complaint preferred by the petitioner herein expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from today, after hearing all the parties. We make it clear that we are not expressing any opinion on the merits of the contentions raised in the writ petition and it is for the Board to consider the same and pass orders as deem fit and appropriate. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Issue urgent copy. P.R. RAMAN, (JUDGE) V. K. MOHANAN, (JUDGE) knc/-