- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CONTINUATION SHEET. CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.818 OF 2002 APPLICATION NO.818 OF 2002 APPLICATION NO.818 OF 2002 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1043 FROM ORDER NO.1043 FROM ORDER NO.1043 OF 2001 OF 2001 OF 2001 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : FEBRUARY 4, 2005. : FEBRUARY 4, 2005. : FEBRUARY 4, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . By order dated 29th October 2001 the learned Trial Judge was directed to dispose of the Notice of Motion within three months from the date of receipt of writ of the order. This application is made by the original Plaintiff for extension of time fixed by this Court. This Court has given direction to the learned Judge to dispose of the Notice of Motion within stipulated period. As the direction is given to the learned Trial Judge, it is for the learned Judge to seek extension of time. The application at the instance of the Appellant in the proceeding is not maintainable. Application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE