IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.826 of 2010 1. SAVITRI DEVI, wife of Harendra Nath Rai @ Banga Rai @ Hirendra Nath Rai. 2. Harendra Nath Rai @ Banga @ Hirendra Nath Rai, son of Late Kailash Rai. 3. Ranjish Rai @ Ranjit Rai, son of late Kailash Rai, 4. Pankaj Kumar Rai @ Pankaj Rai, son of Hirendra Nath @ Harendra Nath Rai @ Banga Rai. 5. Kumkum Devi, wife of Pankaj Rai. 6. Nutan Kumari, daughter of Harendra Nath Rai @ Hirendra Nath Rai @ Banga Rai. All resident of village – Sagra, Police Station – Rajpur, District – Buxar, presently residing at Obera Sector – 9, House of Ram Bahan Mistri, Quarter No. 242, Obera, Police Station – Obera, Chaupam, District – Sonebhadra, (U.P.). -------------------- Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------------ Opposite Party. ------- 05. 30.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. The case is instituted on the basis of complaint case no. 90C/2009, petitioners are named accused being in-laws of the complainant carry allegation of demand of dowry, torture in various ways mental or physical. However, during the course of argument, it is stated that relationship between the parties are going to be normalised and in the similar application filed by the husband pending in another Bench of this court. Some settlement to this effect appears to have arrived at and it is expected that the couple shall rejoin their company and continue their marital life. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender within four weeks from receipt of the copy of this order, petitioners, namely, (1) Savitri Devi, (2) Harendra Nath Rai @ banga Rai @ Hirendra Nath Rai, (3) - 2 - Ranjish Rai @ Ranjit Rai, (4) Pankaj Kumar Rai @ Pankaj Rai, (5) Kumkum Devi and (6) Nutan Kumari, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in connection with Rajpur P.S. Case No. 101 of 2009 arising out of Complaint Case No. 90(C) of 2009, Subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. So far as petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 4 being senior male members of the family they are to avail this privilege with additional condition to attend to court at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, on failure on two consecutive dates, privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)