K:^ rt-^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTCSGARH AT BILASPUR rc.6.) M. C. C. No. ^^h of 2011 s APPLICANT/ Petitioner/Plaintiff ..^•n^^' ^9!^' pB^0-: p^^--- Q^ ,^<fe ^^^.::..^-Cl ^-^"\\-v' Smt. Chitkunwar Jaiswal, aged about 55 years, wife of Shri Jiwanlal Jaiswal, Occupation-Assistant Teacher, 6overnment Girls Middte School, Adabhar R/o Village and Post Adabhar, Tahsil-Sakti, bistrict- Bilaspur (now District-Janjgir-Champa) (C.G.) VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS/ :1. Respondents/befendants 2. Yashwant Lal, aged about 55 years, S/o Madan Mohan Gupta, incharge Headmaster, 6overnment ^irls Middle School, Adabhar Dau Ram, aged about 60 years, S/o Andher Ram, by caste-Kahra Ram Lal, aged about 57 years, S/o Kushal, by caste-Kahra Tijram, aged about 90 years, S/o Jagdeo by caste-Gond Chinta Ram, aged about 56 years, S/o Tekmari Jaiswal Nityanand, aged about 54 years, S/o Tekman Jaiswal Lalan Prasad, aged about 51 years, S/o Tekman Jaiswal, Smt. Ketkunwar, aged about 76 years, widow of Tekman Jaiswal A II above R/o Village <& Post-Adabhar, Tahsil-Sakti, bistrict-Bilaspur (Now District-JanJ9ir-Champa) (C.G.) 9. Smt. Sahodara Bai, aged about 41 years, b/o Tekman and wife of Tilak Ram by caste Jaiswal, R/o Village Kosam Nara (Kotara Road), Tahsil and District-Raigarh (M.P.) (now C.G.) 10. S.P. Tiwari Assistant bistrict Inspector of Schools, East Malkharoda at and Post Malkharoda, Tahsil-Sakti, District-Bilaspur (M.P.) (now bistrict-Janjgir-Champa (C.6.)) 11. Block Education Officer, Malkharoda at & Post Malkharoda, Tahsil-Sakti, bistrict-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 12. Joint Director, bepartment of Education at and Post Bilaspur, bistrict-Bilaspur (C.6.) 13. The State of M.P., through the Collector, Bilaspur (M.P.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF FIRST APPEAL N0. 467 OF 1997 XI-HC—78 3T1^T ^T f^'li<=b TT8TT W^T 9?iHi<^ ^ -^ l^ ^ z^ *il*1CTI «)*1S^ ^^T ^i^i^^.^ ^t^pTs;, l^rray: ^c.ri^S^0'^200 ^^\ 1T5W (^3^^) '^riW^tcT 31^1 cf)i^<i1i ^i^KnT^ft^^f^K ir'^rf^H'sn^i SB: HON. SHRI H.K. AGAR^AL. J. 24.11.2011 Shri H.S.Patel, counsel for|fche applicant. Heard on M.C.C. for restor^tion of F.A.No.467/ 1997, dismissed for want of prosecution on 19.10.52011. On due consideration, I| am satisfied that the applicant succeeded in explaining his non| the matter carne up for heai'ing oj Accordingly/ M.C.C. ^ dismissed for want of prosecutic] original number. -appearance before this Court when n 19.10,2011. allowed and F.A.No.467/1997, ?n on 19.10.2011, is restored to its Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge