THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos. 2891 OF 2005 AND 23098 OF 2006 DATED: 11-2-2008 WRIT PETITION No. 2891 OF 2005 Between: P. Nageswara Rao ……………Petitioner And The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad and two others ……………Respondents WRIT PETITION No. 23098 OF 2006 Between: P. Nageswara Rao ……………Petitioner And The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad and three others ……………Respondents ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy, J) On the incorrect representation made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Writ Petition No. 2891 of 2005 is pending before the Division Bench and Writ Petition No. 23098 of 2008 is to be heard along with same, the matters are posted before the Division Bench. On the previous date, as the counsel for the petitioner was not present, we directed the matter to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, neither the learned counsel for the petitioner is present nor there is any representation, which shows that the counsel is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the writ petitions are dismissed in default. A. GOPAL REDDY, J NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J Dated: 11-02-2008 ks