IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 6425 OF 2010 [Shri Kailas Ramvilas Rathi VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors.] Mr. A.G. Talhar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. N.H. Borade, AGP for the respondent-State Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders P.C.:- 1. Heard counsel. The mutation entry was subjected to challenge by filing Revision Application after about 38 years and therefore, the learned Additional Divisional Commissioner, Nasik declined to grant relief. The petitioner is guilty of laches and delay in seeking such reliefs. Therefore, it is difficult to find fault with the discretion used by the revisional authority. Petition is therefore dismissed. The petitioner is at liberty, however, to seek any other remedy like filing of suit or proceedings for the rectification of the consolidation scheme. Sd/- DT. : 22.07.2010 [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp