IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 759/2009 [Mohd. Adil s/o Mohd Salak ..vs.. state] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR, J. DATE : 6 th APRIL , 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.759/2009 Heard Shri Bezalwar,Advocate for the applicant. For the reasons stated in the application, filing of the C.C. dispensed with, for the present. Same be filed within a period of two weeks. Application stands disposed of. 0000 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.759/2009: Heard Shri Bezalwar, Advocate for applicant and Shri Sonare, A.P.P. for state. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 of Cr.P.C. Allegations against the applicant are that he along with other accused including main accused had been to the Bar and Restaurant of complainant and there, offence under section 395 of I.P.C. was committed. Learned Sessions Judge, while rejecting the anticipatory bail of the accused has observed that “accused along with other accused had come to the restaurant and threatened the complainant with knife and robbed the amount of rupees five thousand and caused the damage to the restaurant property. The four accused on similar allegations have been already arrested by police and some of them have been released on bail.” : In these circumstances of the case, the anticipatory bail can not be granted. Application stands disposed of. Liberty to apply for bail. JUDGE SMP