IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13503 of 2011 Sayed Mafooz Alam, S/O Late Sayed Nasir Alam, R/O Bodh Gaya Bazar, P.O. & P.S.- Bodh Gaya, Distt.- Gaya. . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Urban Development and Housing, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. Nagar Panchayat, Bodh Gaya through its Executive Officer, Bodh Gaya. 3. Nagar Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Bodh Gaya. . . . . . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 29.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has established two hotels adjacent to each other in the name of Hotel Tokyo and Hotel Thai International. The petitioner has challenged the notice dated 21.07.2011 (annexure-5), whereby he has been directed to demolish the unauthorized structure within 15 days, failing which the authorities would demolish the same and recovered its cost from the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that the notice does not specify the violation committed by the petitioner. I too find from the perusal of the notice that nature of violation is not clear. The authorities would issue a supplementary notice specifying the nature of violation. Example: Whether some floor has been constructed without sanction of map or whether there is deviation against the law. Such supplementary notice should be served on the petitioner preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner would be entitled to give a detail cause putting his case before the authority concerned within further period of three weeks. Thereafter the authorities would dispose of the matter in 2 accordance with law. Till the decision of the authority neither demolition nor construction/addition in the plot would take place. It will be open for the petitioner to present his case either through himself or through the counsel. This application stands disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)