'IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ]C.G’[ WRIT PETITION Non???" 2004 ',.-' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 l227 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CEERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ,PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OF DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERES: PETITIONER Kailash Paik S/ o Shri Damodar paik aged about 35 years, Up—Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Padigacn, tahsil and District— Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattlsgarh Through M Secretary Panchyat Department M q are" :7/(Ar\ $°‘ ‘o‘\ $ .\$ / D K S Bhawan Ralpur {C G } 2. The director of the Panchyat department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) $ we‘ " I‘ ;« zi/ogjmmzi A Shri RS. Patel counsel'for ihe petitioner. §hn Sanlav H€arcL v Couneel for the petitioner S Agrawal Guvt, Advocam for thé State. ubmits that th€ patitioner hag filed the revision under Section 91 of the Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, E393, before the Director of the Panohavat in the month. of June, 2004 which waS regismred as Pancha-Jat ReViSion N0.3l-Af 89/ 2003-2GO4 and for the ’Iast three month; the 1‘6Vision is pCnding and thc Director of the Panchayat has n at decided the same, Having heard the learned counsel for the, parties and having ances of the caee and having regaKl is pending before the Director of regard to the facts and circums‘; to tha fact that the revieion Palichavat for the last more eiection of the Panchayat is months and the next election pending, respondent No.2 is. d months, With ihe aforesaid directio 1n View of m1 ee months when {he term ox the WA emg to exmre m 1mm are due and the rev1S1on 1s stlll ‘ ected to decide the revision filed bV the petitioner as early as possi 1e preferably Within period of two this writ petition ie dispoeed o£ M‘W.P. No. 2375/ ’2004 l . this: order. l.A.No'.5956] 2004 stand diepose i of. Parties are entitled for certified copy of this order. Sdl- LQBHADOQ a Judge anti ’ * '[WW m