1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Second Bail Application No. 9113/2010 Tursi Ram Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 2.11.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Anil Jain- for the petitioner Mr Laxman Meena, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charges have been framed thus in view of the liberty granted while dismissing the first bail application, petitioner has moved this bail application. It is stated that though allegations against petitioner were for causing injury by an iron rod but a 'lathi' was recovered. In the medical report the injury is said to be dangerous to life. Looking to the aforesaid so also age of the petitioner, who is 65 years old and the dispute is between family members, petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. 2 Accordingly, bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Tursi Ram may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 279/2010 registered at Police Station – Nihalganj, Dholpur for offence under Section/s 341, 323, 379, 325 and 307 IPC provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma