IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.442 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: August 28, 2009. Ram Gopal ...Petitioner(s) v. Mittar Sain Malhotra & Anr. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri Sajjan Singh Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Shri Rajinder Goyal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ORDER Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): Respondent No.2 is present in Court. Shri Rajinder Goyal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 has placed on record a receipt issued by Shri Ram Gopal – petitioner receiving an amount of Rs.4,28,212/-, which is taken on record. Counsel for respondent No.2 states that the entire consequential benefits of the petitioner have been paid. However, learned counsel for the petitioner disputes this fact and states that some amount on account of HRA and CCA is yet to be paid. Be that as it may, I am not inclined to proceed further in the matter. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to make a representation to the respondents within one month from today and if any such representation is made by the petitioner, the same shall be disposed of by the respondents in accordance with law within three months thereafter. It is needless to say that if any amount is found due, the same shall be paid to the petitioner within one month thereafter and in case the representation of the petitioner is rejected, he shall be communicated the orders. Rule discharged. August 28, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge