IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1224 of 2008 ABHINAV MALLICK Versus THE STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS ----------- 3 08.05.2009 This application has been filed with a prayer for issuance of direction to the private respondent nos. 3 to 6 who are the officials of the State Bank of India for returning some documents which the petitioner had submitted before them for the purpose of taking loan but neither the loan was sanctioned nor the documents were returned to him. A further prayer is also for directing the respondent no.2, Superintendent of Police, Supaul for making enquiry into the matter. In the application the nature and number of documents which were filed before the respondent nos. 3 to 6 have not been disclosed at all. Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, A.C. to G.A.7 and Mr. Anshuman Singh, learned counsel for the private respondent nos. 3 to 6 submitted that the petitioner had approached the Bank for some loan. Loan was not sanctioned because on the same property the original documents had already been filed before another Bank i.e. Pubjab National Bank for the purpose of taking loan by the petitioner. It was further submitted that regarding the matter an F.I.R. No.66 of 2009 dated 28th March 2009 u/s 166, 385/34 I.P.C and 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act has already been lodged by the petitioner under which investigation is already going on. Thus, when the matter is already being investigated under an F.I.R filed by the petitioner 2 for the same purpose and the details of documents are not disclosed in the writ application, this application appears to be misconceived, hence, it is dismissed as such. Jay/ ( C. M. Prasad. J. )