IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-32830 of 2010 Date of Decision: 07.01.2011 Rajesh Kumar Kansal .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. R.S. Rai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, DAG Punjab for the respondent – State 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that petitioner and deceased were got married about 11 years before and out of their wedlock 2 children i.e. one daughter and one son are residing with the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further argued that even if cruel behaviour will not amount to abetment and instigation as defined under Section 107 IPC, hence, no offence under Section 306 IPC is said to be made against accused for the alleged suicide of his wife. Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that petitioner must be released on bail on furnishing personal bond and one surety to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Petition stands allowed accordingly. (ALOK SINGH) 07.01.2011 JUDGE reena