IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9283 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 24, 2011. Kulwinder Nath and others .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Pawan Kumar Goklaney, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.J.S.Puri, Additional AG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.J.S.Puri, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners seek a mandamus to grant them the pay revision w.e.f. 1.11.1971 and subsequent further revisions of their pay in the revised pay scale(s) in terms of the decision dated 24th March, 2009 passed by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.2208 of 1989, Lekh Raj Khera and others versus State of Punjab and another. They also rely C.W.P.No .9283 of 2011 2 upon an order dated 3rd February, 2010 passed by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.1788 of 2010 (Sewa Singh and others versus State of Punjab and others) whereby the benefit of decision in Lekh Raj Khera's case (supra) was extended to other similarly situated employees subject to, however, the order which could be passed in LPA/SLPs and was made binding upon the parties even if no separate appeal was to be filed in that case. The present writ petition is also accordingly disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in Sewa Singh and others' case (supra). Dasti. May 24, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE