IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37171 of 2010 SIKANDRA MISHRA @ SIKANDAR MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 04/ 25.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned P.P. for the State. Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that matter has already been compromised between the parties and the statement of the complainant has already been recorded in the court of learned Principal Judge, Family court, Gopalganj. So, in the aforesaid circumstances, provisional bail of the petitioner be confirmed. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that he has no information about the above stated compromise. Since the petitioner has furnished certified copy of compromise petition dated 4.1.2011 filed in the court of Sri D.N.Bhardwaj, Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj as well as certified copy of deposition of the complainant recorded in Matrimonial case no.207/2010 in the court of the learned Principal Judge, Family court, Gopalganj, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 8.10.2010 by this court is hereby confirmed. However, Sri D.N. Bhardwaj, Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj should verify the genuiness of the compromise and if it is found that no compromise petition has been filed on behalf of the complainant then in that event, bail granted to the petitioner may be cancelled by the court below itself. - 2 - Let a copy of this order be sent to the court of Sri D.N.Bhardwaj, Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Complaint case no.1446/2007. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)