THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.25514 of 2010 Dated: 08.11.2010 Between: Gudala Nageswara Rao and others. .. Petitioners. And The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District at Kakinada, and others. .. Respondents. ORDER: It is the grievance of the petitioners that the 4th respondent is not registering a case on the complaints lodged by the 1st petitioner on 15.03.2010, 29.05.2010 and 28.06.2010, complaining about the missing of his son namely G.Srikanth, and harassing them by calling them to the police station in connection with Crime No.149 of 2010 of P.S. Ravulapalem, East Godavari District, to which they are no way concerned, and insisting them for production of the said Srikanth. The 3rd respondent filed a detailed counter-affidavit, stating that basing on the complaint lodged by one Ms.Shaik Vamsi Bain, a case in Crime No.149 of 2010 on the file of Ravulapalem Police Station was registered against one Srikanth, the son of petitioners 1 and 2 herein, and the same is pending. It is also stated that as the said Srikanth is absconding, they enquired with the petitioners about the clues of Srikanth, if any, available with them, and instead of co-operating with the investigating agency, the petitioners filed the present writ petition with a view to save Srikanth. It is further stated that none of the complaints alleged to have been submitted by the petitioners are received by them, however, on the basis of a complaint dated 02.11.2010, a case in Crime No.230 of 2010 on the file of Ravulapalem Police Station was registered on the same day under the Head ‘Man Missing’, in which investigation is pending, and that they assured that investigation in both the cases will be completed as expeditiously as possible and appropriate reports will be filed before the concerned Courts at the earliest. The allegations made by the petitioners as to summoning them to the police station more than ten times and making them to sit in the police station till evening and abusing them are denied. In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the 3rd respondent, no further orders need be passed in the present writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly closed, placing on record the stand taken by the 3rd respondent referred above. No order as to costs. ___________ N.V. RAMANA 08.11.2010 v v