IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.834 of 2008 BISHWA NATH RAI , SON OF SHRI SITARAM RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAHARDIARA, P.O. AND P.S. SONPUR, DISTT. SARAN 2. BINDA RAI, SON OF SHRI SABHAPATI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAHARDIARA, P.O. & P.S. SONPUR,DISTT. SARAN 3. RAJDEO RAI, SON OF SHRI R.N. RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SAMACHAK, P.O. HARAULI, DISTT. VAISHALI 4. RAM BINOD PRASAD RAI, SON OF SHRI RAJDEO RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAHARDIARA, P.O. & P.S. SONPUR, DISTRICT- SARAN 5. KRISHNA RAI, SON OF SRI RAM LAGAN RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PAHLEZA BARAK, NAYA TOLA, P.O. & P.S. SONPUR,DISTRICT-SARAN…….. ……… PETITIONERS. VERSUS 1 THE UNION OF INDIA 2 SHRI R.S. BHATNAGAR, THE G.M. E.C. RAILWAY,HAZIPUR 3 SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, THE D.R.M. E.C. RAILWAY, SONPUR 4 SJRO R.K. RAJAK, THE D.R.M. (P), E.C. RAILWAY, SONEPUR………………………………..OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 3 24-2-2010 Naresh Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the Railway. While dismissing the writ petition filed by the petitioners this Court had observed that if so advised the petitioners may file representation before the authorities for consideration of their case. It appears from the show cause that the representation has been rejected. In these circumstances, we are not persuaded to entertain this contempt petition. It is, therefore, dismissed. ( Shiva Kirti Singh,J) ( J.N. Singh, J)