IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 31ST MARCH 2008 / 11TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 10801 of 2008(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- P.K.BABU, PANUKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, ERIYODE P.O, KODUNGALLUR. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT: --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/03/2008, ALONG WITH WPC NOS. 10802, 10803 & 10804/08, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NOs. 10801, 10802, 10803 & 10804 OF 2008 J ========================= Dated this the 31st day of March, 2008 J U D G M E N T In these writ petitions, petitioners claim that they have been granted permits subject to settlement of timings. 2. In WP(C) No.10801/08, Ext.P1 is the proceedings of RTA and in WP(C) No.10802/2008, Ext.P1 is the judgment of the STAT directing grant of permit. Similarly in WP(C) 10803/2008, Ext.P2 is the proceedings of the RTA and in WP(C) No.10804/2008, Ext.P1 is the proceedings fo the RTA. It is complaining of delay in implementing the aforesaid orders, these wit petitions have been filed. 3. If as stated by the petitioners, the aforesaid grants by the RTA and the STAT have become final, it is only appropriate that the respondent convenes a timing conference and settle the timings and thereafter issue the permit. WPC 10801, 10802, 10803 & 10804/08 :2 : 4. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing that the aforesaid process shall be completed by the respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp