IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35544 of 2008 1. RAVINDRA RAI 2. SUNIL RAI 3. HARE RAM RAI @ HARE RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 19.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a complaint case under Sections 323, 392 of the Penal Code. Learned counsel submits from the allegations that the assault is only with fists and slaps. In fact, the controversy relates to a dispute with regard to the proceedings of a meeting of preparation of list of APL and BPL. Learned counsel for the complainant urges that the allegations are of demand for extortion. Be that as it may considering from the allegations the parties appear to be well known to each other and the complainant has not been divested of the land and agricultural rights in any manner. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, abovenamed surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Bikramganj in Complaint case No. 452 of 2007. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)