1 crap123.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 123 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant VERSUS Pandit Kashinath Kavathe ...Respondent ..... Shri S.G.Nandedkar, A.P.P. for the applicant Shri Santosh N. Patne, advocate for the respondent sole. ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 1 st April, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Heard Shri S.G.Nandedkar, A.P.P. for the applicant and Shri Santosh N. Patne, learned counsel for the respondent. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant/State seeking leave to file appeal, challenging the judgment and order of acquittal, dated 19.9.2009, rendered by the learned Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, in Criminal Appeal No. 66 of 2007, thereby reversing the judgment and order of conviction, passed by the Trial Court on 5.7.2007, convicting and sentencing the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 279 2 crap123.10 and 304-A of the Indian Penal Code, allowing the said appeal and apparently there are contrary judgments of the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court with each other and the Trial Court convicted and sentenced the respondent as afore said; whereas the First Appellate Court acquitted him as mentioned here in above. 3 After perusal of the R. and P. and the judgments of the Trial Court as well as the First Appellate Court, present application is required to be allowed.. 4 Hence, present application is allowed and leave to file appeal is granted. 5 Admit. 4 Shri Santosh N.Patne, learned counsel waives service of notice for the respondent after admission. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap123.10