FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WP/8854/2010 MAMATA V/S STATE ... Shri Sachin S.Panale, Advocate for petitioner Shri K.G.Patil, AGP for respondents 1 and 3 and Shri A.B.Girase, Advocate for respondent 2. ... 1. Heard learned counsel for respective parties. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent University to reassess the answer sheet of the petitioner. Shri Girase, learned Advocate for respondent makes a categoric statement that in accordance with the rules of respondent No.2 University, answer sheet of the petitioner was sent to another University for re- evaluation and that in the said re-evaluation, though the marks of the petitioner have been found to have been increased, she has failed to get the qualifying marks for passing. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for interference 3. Writ Petition stands rejected. No order as to costs. (R.M.BORDE, J.) (B.R.GAVAI, J.) Dt.10.12.2010 akl