1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 907 of 2004 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and A.B.Chaudhari, JJ. DATE : March 5, 2007. Heard Mr. Anand Parchure, Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Fulzele, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Present Writ Petition is filed seeking quashing of the order dt. 22.5.2003 passed by the respondent no.2 as well as for issuing direction to the respondent no.1 to consider the application of the petitioner once again for allotment of land as per policy of the Government. Mr. Fulzele, learned Assistant Government Pleader, after obtaining instructions from the competent Authority, makes a statement that fresh proposal of the petitioner for allotment of land is already forwarded by the Collector to the State Government, which shall take decision within a reasonable period, on its own merits 2 accordingly to law and procedure applicable in this regard. In view of the above referred statement, the cause of action involved in the present petition does not survive. The Writ Petition is disposed of as 'infructuous'. However, it is made clear that the State Government has to take decision strictly according to law and policy without being influenced by our order, one way or the other. JUDGE JUDGE ssj