IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 5TH JUNE 2008 / 15TH JYAISHTA 1930 LA.App..No. 955 of 2007() ------------------------- LAR.61/1996 of PRL.SUB COURT, KOZHIKODE .................... APPELLANT: RESPONDENT: ---------------------- THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, L.A., N.H.NO.I, KOZHIKODE. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANTH BALAJI RESPONDENTS: CLAIMANTS & RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------ ABOOBACKER, MULLOLI HOUSE, ERANHIKKAL P.O., KOZHIKODE TALUK. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: LAA 955/2007 ORDER ON I.A.2344/2007 IN L.AA.955/2007 DISMISSED 5.6.2008 SD/- PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L.A.A.No.955 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 5th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT Even though the learned Government Pleader has addressed me strenuously, I am not inclined to admit this appeal. It is seen that the reference court relied on Ext.A2 judgment in L.A.R. No. 63/99. The Commissioner had reported to the court that the property in Ext.A2 judgment originally formed part and parcel of the property which is the subject matter of L.A.R. No. 62/96, which is one of the three cases covered by the impugned common judgment. The Commissioner's report was to the effect that the property in Ext.A2 and these properties were similarly situated. The Registry reports that Ext.A2 judgment has attained finality in the sense that no appeal has been preferred against Ext.A2. Learned Government Pleader also fairly conceded that though the impugned common judgment pertains to three cases, appeal has been preferred only against the present case. For both these reasons, there is no justification for entertaining this appeal. Appeal will stand dismissed in limine. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE sv.