IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46180 of 2008 1. MANOJ PRASAD 2. Ranjeet Kumar Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 16.12.2008 Heard Mr. Nawal Kishore Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned A.P.P. The case is under section 396 of the Indian Penal Code and the informant is the officer-in-charge of the Tehta Out Post under Makhdumpur Police Station. He stated that he was informed by the officer-in-charge of the Paliganj police station that the F.I.R. named accused persons were arrested in Paliganj P.S. case no.139 of 2007 and in that confession they confessed to have hijacked the truck and to have killed the cleaner and the driver of the vehicle. The contention is that except the confessional statement, there is no material in the case diary and, as such, learned Judge dismissed the prayer and has not recorded any such material. His further contention is that it is a false and fabricated case because the police has attempted to create a material so as to justifying its action and to create also an eye-wash against its action of not properly investigating hijacking of the vehicle and murder of its driver and cleaner. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, let two petitioners named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R. K. Pandey, J.M., Ist Class, Jehanabad, in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. case - 2 - no.191 of 2007. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )