Writ Petition No. 3769 (MS) of 2001 (Old No. 11439/96) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Mr. Ahrar Baig, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Gopal Narain & Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Brief of holders for respondent no. 1 to 6 and Mr. V.D. Bisen, learned counsel of the respondent no. 9. The case has wrongly been transferred as the same has already been decided vide order dated 3.4.1996. (P.C. Verma, J.) 29-7-2008 Writ Petition No. 3769 (MS) of 2001 Hon’ble S.R. Singh, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order annexed as Annexure -6 to the writ petition passed by the Tehsildar Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar. The impugned order purports to have been passed pursuant to a direction issued by the District Magistrate for providing pohce force with a view to enabling Sri Vinod kumar Sharma to get the orops in question harvested. Having heard counsel for the petitioners, I am of the view that in the absence of the order of the District Magistrate it would not be possible to ascertain the exact nature of the order impugned in the writ petition. It may be observed that U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act need with rules 54 A, 55 and 56 of the U.P. consolidation of Holdings Rules 1954 provides for delivery of physical possession order The chabs allotted to a briware hosders with or without starding crops in accordance with the Rules. I am, therefore, not inclivod to entertain this petition for quashing if the impugned order. Suffice it to say that the petitioner may file on petitioner before the Distt. Magistrate by Director of Consolidation for the redressal of their grievances. In case any application is moved on behalf of the petitioners, the District Magistrate/District Deputy Director of Consolidation shall look into the grievance of the petitioner pass appropriate order. There application with a period of one month it will be open to the District Magistrate / District Deputy Director of Consolidation to pass such interim order as may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstance of the case. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Let a copy of this order made available to the counsel for the petitioner on payment of usual charges during the Course of day. (S.R. Singh, J.) 3.4.96