l^^ ..^\^ ^'"'l.-^.^-,^*t' c. ^ ,(G^ ' -' ^^.^""^'^^'-^ ^?1^>"" y^°" IN THE HlGhLCOURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.No.lf^/2005 Petitioner 'l.>- Respondents ^i^. '"c^l°fk'v Dhanuk Lal Dhruv, S/o Brijlal Dhruv, Aged about 51 years, R/o Viltage - Mopka, Tahsil &District-Bilaspur(CG) Versys 1) State of Chhattisgarh - Through the Revenue Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) ,CQ^^ /2) The Collector Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur 1. ^~^y ^!!r:.^' (CG). / 3) The Additional Cottector Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (CG). / 4) Shri P.C.Prasad, Additional Collector Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (CG) / 5) The Sub-Divisional Officer Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur(CG). Wm^ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTtON OF INDIA XI-HC-78 vdx^t ^qiqirtq, tp-al^-'Ko, Rom^ -=—W-P 4'705 TPTc^T ^TT^ .-*...•...........^..............."^g^ 2005- 3n^$Tq^?(^crf5^) 3TI^$T<Rf^:rt^P cTSn3TT^$T^mc?3 ^^IT^R^rftn 3TT^$T 5.10.2005 W.P.No.4709/2005 Shri P.Diwakar, Srj the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh, State/respondents. At the very outset, learn^ that there is an alternative impugned order passed by the the matter, he prays for filean appeal before the appelta^ This prayer made by allowed. The petition is permitt©d| petitioner to file a duly consj authority prescribed under the At this stage, iearned the impugned order was passe^ may not be within limitation. If the appeal is not free to file an application for cr>i^[c^^vi +is+icoT^'fe^ ^f^i^-CK ^^ri^? 311^^7 Advocal-e withShri P,RPatankar, counsel for <&overnment Advocate for the ^d counsel for the petitioner submits rer^edy for filing an appeal agarnst the ^dditional Coilector. In this view of withdr|swal of this petition with a liberty to \e authority. le^xmed counse! for the petitioner is |to be withdrawn with a liberty to the tituted appeal before the appellate Ifexw. co|jnsel for the petitioner submits that on 27.42005, therefbre, the appeal witl|in limitation, the petitioner shal! be c^ndonation of delay under Section 5 of '3Z XI-HC-78 \dx^( -qi^lrtq/U>-al<<-f<l<o, Rlrtl^H^ *1l*IWl ^TTT^ 3TT^§Tq^(^g6T^) wi^oo OT^^TcRTf^lt^ ?CT3n^$T3RT^ ^zuz^ ^ ^^ ^maR^rf^Tsn^^T — '2— the Limitation Act and if such authorit/ shall consider and dis^ law with a view to determine the Consequsntly, M.W.P.No.^ stand disposed of. 4)|^[<^<i)r1+1!^C^T^I^^xRj1^-C!^ ^3?f^?3i?^^T in application is filed, the appeilate ose of the same in accordance with nerits of the case. i813/2005 and I.A.No.8421/2005 Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge