r^ - f o^> IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) No. ^^6 /2007 PETITIONER .^€ ^M^ ^:^\^f-" (^ R.ajkumar Chandrakar S/o. Chheduram Chandrakar f^~ Aged about ^5 years, Assistant Teacher, Shashkiya Purva Madhyamik Shala Jhitharatola, Block- Ghuriya, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ ^yz y^ fr- ^^^-^ '*Z....»."r-^'fe'k. '"•S-SS^.V!^^" ll :1. , State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary ifl- Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Districf Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer Block - Ghuriya District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS AT BI1A8FU] ION'BLE M:R. SATIS] Raikumar Chandrakar t. Versus Respondents State ofChhattisgarh & Others. Present: Shri Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate for the petitioner. Miss Deepaii Pandey, Panel Lawyer for me State/respondents. (Passed on 9B1 ofMarch, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing fbr the petitioner submits tfaat tjie -oetrtioner is workins as Assistant Teacher, The oetitioser i B.Ed, Examination certificate on 09.09.1993. on his own expenses. 2, Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the auestion involved. herein asto whether the teacher. who obtained l.Ed. ExamiDation certificate on his own exoeases. is entitied to two advance increments, 3. According to learned counse! for tJie petitioner, the petitioner is entitied to two advance incremsnts in view ofthe decision ofthis Court in the case of S'haradwaj Vs. dcipai Corporation, Diirg and another {2006 (II) MPJR- -2- (^) CG 96}. This Court ia the case ofYasbwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), ca.me to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Certificate on their owa exoenses. are covered bv the circular dated 24.12.98 issued by the State Govemmeat of Madhva Pradesh. 4. Leamed counsel for the petitioner farther submits fhat the facts and question of law involved in the present case are squarely covered bv dscision of this Court in the case of another (SuDra'). to whieh leamed counse} aooearine for tbe \~ "~sr---^v resoondents fairlv concedes and aarees with the avenxsect made by 'lsaraed counsel appearing for the petrtioner- 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the ordsr .4-1 oassed m tb.e case ot ar Btiai (Siipra.), subject to ventication of the tact as to w.t'ether tlie petrtioner has .^^A.s. B.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12,1998 & 1 .3.1999 and fi.srther whether he has n oaid two adva.Ece increments or not. No order as to costs. Amit Sd/- SatishK.Agnihutri Judge