THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.30422 of 2010 ORDER The petitioner is working as Head Constable in Central Industrial Security Force. He was imposed the punishment of compulsory retirement from service with full pension and gratuity through order, dated 29.03.2010, by the second respondent. The petitioner filed appeal before the first respondent. The appeal was rejected through order, dated 30.07.2010. The same is challenged in this writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Standing Counsel for the Central Government. On being inflicted the punishment of compulsory retirement, the petitioner availed the remedy of appeal under Section 9(1) of the Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968 (for short ‘the Act’). The first respondent rejected the appeal. Though the petitioner challenged the order of compulsory retirement, as confirmed in the appeal on several grounds, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition at this stage. The reason is that under Section 9(2A) of the Act, a further remedy of revision is available to the petitioner to the Director General. The petitioner can avail that remedy. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to avail the remedy under Section 9(2A) of the Act. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J Date:08.12.2010 sj