IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT THURSDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2007 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1929 RP.No. 1188 of 2007(P) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.17994/2007 Dated 31/07/2007 .................... : REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP: ---------------------------------------------------- M.D. THOMAS, S/O. LATE MR.DEVASIA, AGED 55 YEARS, MULLOORAKAM HOUSE, NADACKAL P.O., ERATTUPETTA. BY ADV. SRI.RAJU K.MATHEWS SRI.P.B.ASOKAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU, IDUKKI, THODUPUZHA. 3. MATHEW MANTHARA, ADVOCATE, KOZHUVANAL P.O., MEENACHIL TALUK. 4. JOE MATHEW, PUTHENPEDIKAYIL (H), ELAMKADU, KOOTIKAL, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 5. S. ASOKAN, ADVOCATE, THODUPUZHA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.RAVINDRA BABU THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT, J ------------------------------------ R.P.No.1188 of 2007 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of December, 2007 O R D E R The prayer in this petition is to review the judgment in Writ Petition No.17994 of 2007. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner in detail. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the observations in para.10 of the judgment are incorrect and therefore need to be reviewed. I find absolutely no error apparent on the face of the record in the observations in para.10 or elsewhere which justifies or warrants the invocation of the powers for review. 2. This Review petition is accordingly dismissed. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) rtr/- 2