IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2148 of 2006 AJIT KUMAR @ MUNNA,SON OF LATE RAM CHANDRA PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA SALIMPUR AT AND P.S. BARH, DISTT. PATNA. --------- PETITIONER. Versu 1. MAHESH PRASAD GUPTA 2. SURESH PRASAD. 3. DIN BANDHU PRASAD GUPTA 4. DINA NATH PRASAD GUPTA 5. SHANKAR PRASAD GUPTA, ALL SON OF LATE LAXMI PRASAD. 6. SAVITRI DEVI, WIDOW OF LATE LAXMI PRASAD. 7. SMT. SARVATI DEVI, DAUGHTER OF LATE LAXMI PRASAD AND WIFE OF SRI PARMESHWAR PRASAD GUPTA, ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE WAZIRGANJ, P.S. WAZIRGANG, DISTT. GAYA. ----- PLAINTIFFS. 8. PREM CHAND PRASAD GUPTA. 9. SURENDRA PRASAD GUPTA, BOTH SONS OF LATE DWARIKA SAO. 10. SMT. RAM SAKHI DEVI, WIFE OF LATE DWARIKA SAO. 11. NIRMALA KUMARI, DAUGHTER OF LATE DWARIKA PRASAD AND WIFE OF SRI RAM CHANDRA PRASAD GUPTA. 12. MEENA DEVI, DAUGHTER OF LATE DWARIKA PRASAD AND WIFE OF SRI RAMESH PRASAD GUPTA, ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.S. MAHNAR, DISTT. – VAISHALI ----- PROFORMA DEFENDANTS. 13. ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA, SON OF LATE RAM CHANDRA PRASAD. 14. SMT. DHARMSHEELA DEVI, WIDOW OF LATE RAM CHANDRA PRASAD. 15. ANIL KUMAR, SON OF LATE RAM CHANDRA PRASAD, RESIDENTS OF MOHALLA – SALIMPUR, AT & P.S. BARH, DISTT. PATNA ------- DEFENDANT NOS. 1 TO 3. ----OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Alok Kumar Sinha, No. 1, Adv. For the opposite parties : Mr. Parth Sarthy, Advocate. ------- 3. 4/2/2009 Mr. Alok Kumar Sinha No. 1 appears on behalf of the petitioner. Opposite party No. 1 is represented by Mr. Parth Sarthy, Advocate. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit itself has finally been disposed of on 2.2.2009 and thus, the Civil Revision application has become infructuous. - 2 - As a result this Civil Revision application is dismissed as having become infructuous. S.Ali (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)