^ QU IN THE HON'BLE 1-116M COURT OF CHHATTCSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) N0. ^^ /2011 PETTTIONER ^ ^.}J- ^^"^Q.^ '^.>w^ ....-••'" ^S^4Y^ *^""" RESPONbENTS I. 2. Radhey Shaym Jangade (Johar), S/o Late Shr-i Basani Rdm Johdr, aged about 58 years, Headmaster, ©ovt. Middle School (Tribal Welfare Department) Sirli, Block-Pali, Distt.- Korba (G.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. -Raipur (C.6.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Korba Distt.-Korba (C.6.) 3. Block Education Officer, Pali, Distt.-Korba (C.6.) WRnLPETETEON UNDER ARTECLE 226 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF IN&IA PARTICULARSOF THE PETITCONER (5):- As per the cause title. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENT (5):- As per the cause title. flc. c;^<^^ ^i ^w^ i:[-;Tin-^E <(:ITS[1[T ^T T^; ?l!;i":::H^TW^Ni- B^. n 'S^ -^ww't\, ®Til<i<i<»,(s(diy^< ^pC&)w5 .^.s^//11 sn^T Tra^r ('^3^?) ^<IRR ^tel 311^1 SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrjvastavait.J. Q9-08-20'I1 learitied appcjinteca ri!l9 tite snri Anii Singn Kaiput, Shri Praveen Das, Depuiy) With the consent of iearili nnaiiy. ine petitioner was Rs.100-150/- in theyear 1976. ne was grantea reguiar pay scai i-earned counsei appear in the case is as to whether, tit effect from the date of initial app^ 1 ne issue involvea nereiti Administrative Tribunal, JabalpL|! others v. State of m.P. & teachers are enntied to reguia^ apfointment. The matter was Leave Petitlon (Civii) No.6892/ap Suoreme Court. uphoiding thel i eacners/Assistant leacners ai|< ininai apDointment. Leameacounsei appean! whiie considering the same Chhattisgarh & 0 iers iW.P.(^ ailowed.the petrtioners to make 4 coilinse as Assistant ieacner on a Tixea ^fter successfuliy compieting tne probation period, oth^rs) tfti<4ifl41l 'ITTC^ff ^T 'f^St' <f^^R ^sifiiiisnt^T ror tne petitioner. Government Aavocate ror me counsei TOI' tne paraes, for the petitioner submits that the issue invoived tije petitloner is entftiea to regular pay scate with ^intment or after compietion of probatlon period. was considered by the Madhya Pradesh State |r in O.A.No.2745/89 {Madhukant Yadvi and 56 i^rs), wherein, it was heid that the simiiariy situated pav scate with effect from frie date of initial t^ken up to the Hon'bie Supreme Court in speciai The said petition was dismlssed by tpe Mon'bie decision of the Tribunai to the effect that the (e entitlea to reguiar pay scaie rrom tne date OT t9 for the Detitioner tsue in Amar Sai p) No.472 suomits that tnis Court, & Oowrs v. State of by order dated 01/08/2006, representation within a period of ten days, raising ;a-:,ic- •STt;'? SiT TIF' is<sep^ 'S^ r<11<<IW<4, E?illyiS, fqclKHy t0p<s)^ -Wfy/ " sn^i ''ra^ (l^^^) ^wwateisii^i ^- thle ail their grievances and in turn, th me represeniation in an oDjecwe of receipt ofthe representation. Accoramgly, the petrtioner ait his grievance, in the tight of me| and in turn, me concernea any, in accordance with law, on from the date of receiDt of the reprl 'n view of tne toregoing, thii concemea (nanner wmin a resooiliaent (s grantea iioerty to maKe representation raising laforesaid judgment and cireuiar dated 27/12/08, is directed to declde tne representation, if |ts own meriB, witnin a penoa OT tnree monms •0sentation, sublect to veriflcaiion of ine Tacis. oraer as to costs. ct>i<<^^i tTw^iy ^f 'fe11^' •rf«^i< ^ atRpT aii^i was airected t period of 30 days from Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge