wwL E’M% @€ ,a a? \ W7’f" > >S.B. 1Service Matterl 1N THE H'IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ‘ (CHHATTISGARH) " WRIT PETITION (S) No.12.“ 3’ (201 1. /1 Flora Tigga, wife of Late Maishi ’I‘igga, ged about 63 years, Retired head Master Govt. Primary School, Kerakachar, Tahsil Patthalgaon, Disu'ict Jashpur, Chhatu'sgarh. V€TSUS , 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Edupation Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. / 2. District Education Officer, JashpuT, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. ,3. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasur and Pension, Jashpur, District Jashpur, C.G. Respondents we M ex” _ ’\ bk‘vw‘w aw v" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE M CONSTITUTION OF INDIA a PETITIONER: y HIGH COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1245 OF 2011 ¢€ PETITIONER Flora Tigga Versus RESPONDENTS Sbte of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition unde! Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Bench z Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri C.J.K. Rao, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushi! Dubey, Government Advocate for the State. this 1 day of March, 201 1) Heard iearned counsel for the parties. (Passed on 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to beneii of two advance increments on account of having‘ passed B.T.l. examination on 10~07—1 969 before her appointment on 15-09-1 980 at her own cost. It is submitted that the issue involved in the prent tition is no longer res integra, as the same has been finally settled by the Supreme Court in Ashe Sexena v. State oft/LP, a. 0m}. 3. lt is furter submitted that this Court has also tan a similar view its order dated 6-2-2009 passed in WP. (S) No.6257 of 2008. Learned counsel further submits that the order dated 29-4-2010 passed in WNo.124 of 2009 wherein relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Ashe Sexene (supra) and the order passed by this Court in another W.A.No.87 of 2009, directions have been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two advance increments as per the circular dated 21-9-1 974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verification of the facts pleaded in the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the case of the petitioner would also be considered on the same lines. 5. in view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per the circular dated 21—9-1 974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after verification of me facts pleaded in the petition within a period of 8 weeks from today. Sd/— SATISH It ANGNIHORI Judge 1 2009 (m) MPJR (so) 59 V,./-. ORDER ORAL 4 t es pe h ke in A.