INSLE BEI-ICH^^ ^riyo IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G) W.P. fSI N0._Sc'j /2007 ^ , ^y^--" ,.-•' Cy''7./ ^Sy ^•' A~ jsl' ^ RESPONDENTS PETITIONER : ^ Lekhan Ram Bhudip Aged about 42 Years, S/o. Shri Pyare Lal Bhudip Assistant Teacher, Aadim Jati Kalyan Vibhag Kanya Aashram Ghotia Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) 3. DistrictEducationOfficer Durg District Durg (C.G.) A. The Collector Tribal Welfare Department Durg (C.G-.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA L HI^ COUKT OF CHHATTtSSARH AT BILASPUR W. P.fSl No. 301 of 2007 Petitioner Versus Lekhan Ram Bhudip State of Chhattisgarh & others SB: Hon'b!e Mr. Justice Satish K. Agmhotri, J Present: Mr. B.L. bembm, counsel for the petitioner. Miss Sunita Jain, Paie! lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on this 22nd E>ay of January, 2007) 1. Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner as well as learned Panei lawyer appearing for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petition is similar to that of in W. P.(5) No. 6883/2006 (Mehatt-ar Ram Sdhu Vs. State of Chhaftisgarh & others), which was disposed of vide order dated 12 Oecember, 2006 (Annexure P/2). TTiey further aibmit that the question of law involved is also the same. 2. In view of the above-stated submissions made by leamed counse! for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 12th December, 2006 passed by 1+>is Couri- in W. P. (5) No. 6883/2006 (Mehanar Ram Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others). No order as to costs. Subhash Sdf- Satish K. Agnihoti Judge