IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELALTE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 811 OF 2005 Mumtaz Ahmed Abdul Salam Shaikh. ...Appellant. Vs. Sabila Mumtaz Ahmed Shaikh. ...Respondent. .... Mr.E. R. Naik for the Appellant. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. November 14, 2005. P.C.: Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant states that despite several requests made by the Learned Advocate of the Appellant, including a letter dated 10th October 2005 and a telegram dated 4th November 2005, the Appellant has not furnished a copy of the Judgment and Order appealed against until date. This appeal was adjourned earlier on 19th September 2005 and 10th October 2005. The last of the aforesaid orders of this Court, notes that an adjournment is sought in order to enable the Appellant to place a copy of the impugned order on the record. In view of the aforesaid circumstances and in view of the statement which has been made by Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant, a conditional order is required to be passed. The Appellant shall, within a period of one week from today, place a copy of the reasoned order of the Trial Court, which is impugned in these proceedings, on the record, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. In the event that a copy of the reasoned order is placed on the record, on or before 21st November 2005, the Registry shall then list the Appeal from Order for admission on 22nd November 2005. .......