1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Writ Petition No.8087 Of 2009. Sow Sangita Nitin Waghe ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra And Others. ... Respondents. -------- Shri. V.V. Ingale, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. A.V. Gondhalekar, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent No.1. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL, JJ. DATE: 1st DECEMBER 2009 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The petitioner is transferred from Latur to Parbhani by an order dated 4th August 2009. The petitioner submits that the transfer is a mid term transfer as the petitioner has served for only two years at Latur. This petition was filed on 15-9-2009. 2 3) The petitioner has alternate efficacious remedies for redressal of her grievances about mid term transfer. In exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution India we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The petitioner may file a representation to the competent authorities. If such a representation is filed we direct the concerned authorities to pass appropriate orders on the same on its own merits. 4) The writ petition is disposed of. (K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.8087.09