f" """"•"" 6^.^< BEFORE THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURfC.G.) CONTEMPT CASE fCIVIL) N0. fQ^ 72010 APPLICANT ^PETITIONER ^ ^n^, ,. ..-.-,^" ^.-- ^ ^•^ 1^W^t>ft^>fiW a^ ladgraj^mgh^ s/bi.^-sm^fty^^r ft^y sv^w^ Aged about - 25 years, C/o - Kawardha Bada, Civil Lines, Raipur (CG) vs. f^s.- ^ NON-APPLICANTS CONTEMNORS 1. Shri Girdhari Lal, S/o - Late Shri Bhimsen, Aged about - 54 years, R/o - Girdhari Park, Raipur 2. Shri O.P. Choudhary, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (CG) 3. Shri Vinod Dewangan, Zone Incharge No. 4, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (CG) ^•-•" CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF WDIA ^-±-..—.^M: HC-22 y an^T^i ^Jcb 3T(§^i WH\^ '^lfirT •^sr'^[PTRT^, ^nl^^Ko, f®l<rtt^^< ^S:..L^&^^ 'HTq^l 9h^icb •i^^T' ^s^r-^rr^ Tri^T ^Nd^-l'RTH^f ^ 'fe^t <^^i< '^•^rf^TR^^T SB : Hon^ble Shri Manindra 19.01.2011 VIohan Shrivastava, J. Shri Goutam Bhaduri, ci Heard. ^unsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the Court, vide order dated 23.3.2| had permitted the renovation that the renovation of the reduQtion of the width of} constructed building in violat| encroached upon the width of| petitioner submits that though this |009 passed in W.P. No.4112/2004, t:o be made subject to the condition |shops should not result in the |the road, respondent No.l has lon of the said order and has also Ithe road. He further submits that even though representatioi|ls have been made to the Commissioner of the Coi|-poration/respondent No.2 and concerned officer, in-charge o]T Zone No.-4/respondent No.3, no action has been taken on the ij-epresentations of the petitioner by the concerned officer. Earlier this Court had ^ranted the petitioner time to file documents. It appears that tl|iere is no spot inspection report. Therefore, this contempt petitic|n is finally disposed ofwith liberty to revive the sanie after inspectjion report on the representation of the petitioner and if eventuality) arises. I'nA ^^ HC-22 ^TI^T^T r<vii<=h ^^\ 9b^ich <ii$a Praveen T m ^^[ ^i^iid^, "^•d1yjl<o. ^cni^^ IT^T TR'^ ^l^dl 5h^|ch "^ 200 fNt^' ^fT^T^RTrw^ftn cM^fo^lt 'RW^tf ^ 'fe^t <f^^l< ^T 3TPOT 'STT^T This Court had passe^ an order dated 23.3.2009. If the petitioner has made repres^ntation to the Commissioner and officers of the Corporation, ^t is their duly to verify by making appropriate spot inspection ^vhether the order of the Court has been violated or not. A copy of this order sh^ll be placed by the petitioner before the Commissioner of Muijiicipal Corporation, Raipur. The Commissioner, Municipal Cofporation, shall carry or cause to be carried out proper spot insp, and the person who has raisej As stated above, the p^ contempt petition, if eventualj ^ction after notice to the petitioner y construction. [titioner shall be at liberty to revive |ty arises. - Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge .[^ ^^. r^i\.^