IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8359 of 1998 Krishna Deo Sharma, son of Mahabir Thakur, resident of village Astha Karjamma, P.S. Tharthari, District Nalanda … Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Health Family Welfare and Medical Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna 2. The Joint Secretary, Health Family Welfare and Medical Education, Govt. of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna 3. The Deputy Secretary, Health Family Welfare and Medical Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna 4. The Civil Surgeon cum Chief Medical Officer, Patna 5. The Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Mokama … Respondents ---------------------------------- 9. 23.8.2011 The petitioner’s challenge to the impugned order dated 4.9.1998 reverting him to his original post of Dresser from the post of Block Extension Educator has hardly any merit. There can be no flaw either on fact or in law in the decision of reversion of the petitioner in view of the specific stand of the respondents that the post of Block Extension Educator was not the promotional post of Dresser on which the petitioner was originally appointed. The concept which was relied by the learned counsel for the petitioner for justifying such a promotion of a Dresser being a Class IV post and therefore filling up of 25% of Class III posts of Block Extension Educator by promotion in absence of any Rule or Circular cannot be accepted. The government circular for promotion from Class IV post of Peon to 25% Class III post of Clerk dated 11.2.1985 being confined only to a specific cadre and that too by way of appointment on Class III post cannot be made applicable in a case like present one where the petitioner admittedly was appointed on the post of Dresser, a non technical 2 post. There can be no promotion from a non technical post as has also been held by a division bench of this Court in cases of employees of Health Department. Reference in this connection may be made to the case of Arvind Kumar Yadav Vs. State of Bihar and others reported in 2005(3) PLJR 642. That being so, this application is wholly misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/