IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.372 of 2009 NANDU SAH S/O LATE NAKCHHED SAH, R/O VILLAGE-KANANA, P.O. KAURIHAR, P.S.RAXAUL, DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN. -APPELLANT Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR, MOTIHARI, EAST CHAMPARAN. 3. THE LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR-CUM- SUBDIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAXAUL, EAST CHAMPARAN. 4. SMT. UMARAWATI DEVI, WIFE OF MUNILAL SAH. 5. SRI MUNILAL SAH, S/O RAM SWARUP SAH. 6. SHAMBHU PRASAD,S/O LATE SHEO NATH SAH. 7. OM PRAKASH PRASAD, S/O LATE SHEO NATH SAH. 8. SUSHIL PRASAD, S/O LATE SHEO NATH SAH. All R/O VILLAGE KANANA, P.O. KAURIHAR, P.S. RAXAUL, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMAPRAN. -RESPONDENTS 2 15.04.2009 Appellant approached this Court for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 25.4.2007 passed by respondent no.3 in Ceiling Case no. 04 of 2006-07. He has also a case that his application for addition of Harihar Sah as a party to the proceeding was also rejected. We are of the view that statutory appeal under Section 30 of the Act should be filed. In the circumstances, we dismiss the appeal in view of alternative remedy available to the writ petitioner 2 and not for the reason stated by the learned single Judge. Since the matter was pending before this Court if the writ petitioner files an appeal before the Appellate Authority within one month from today the appeal shall be considered on merit with notice to all concerned parties interested to the decision in the impugned judgment. The appeal shall not be dismissed on the question of limitation. The appeal is disposed of, as above. (J.B. Koshy,CJ.) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) AAhmad