IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7841 of 2010 1. Savitri Devi W/O Late Saryug Sao R/O Pachana Road, Sansar Pokhar, P.O.+P.S. And Distt.- Lakhisarai. Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board, Through The Chairman, Bihar, Patna 2. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electricity Board, Lakhisarai 3. The S.D.O. Electricity Board, Lakhisarai 4. The Junior Engineer, Electricity Board, Lakhisarai. ----------------------- 2. 19.10.2011. Heard Mr. Dharmendra Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Bihar State Electricity Board and its functionaries. The petitioner apprehending disconnection of his electricity by the respondent authorities of the Board has filed this writ petition. The facts of the matter is that on the delay being caused by the respondent Board in providing electrical connection, the petitioner moved before the District Consumer Forum, Lakhisarai constituted under the Consumers Protection Regulation Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and the rules framed thereunder, giving rise to Consumer Case No.47 of 1999 and which was disposed of by order dated 18.4.2000 directing the respondent Board to provide 2 connection and which had already been provided to the petitioner on 4.4.2000, i.e. during the pendency of the proceedings. An order of payment of cost of Rs.10,000/- was appealed by the respondent Board giving rise to Appeal No.387 of 2000 which is pending consideration before the State Consumer Commission, Bihar, Patna. On alleged disturbance being created by the respondent Board, a second case was filed by the petitioner before the District Consumer Forum, Lakhisarai bearing Consumer Case No.4 of 2007 and in which a cost of Rs.5000/- was awarded against the Board. Copy of the order dated 22.2.2008 is Annexure-2 to the writ petition. The said order is also subject matter of an appeal and pending before the State Consumer Commission, Bihar, Patna. The present writ petition has been filed apprehending disconnection of the electric lines by the respondent Board. No papers have been annexed in the writ petition giving rise to any such apprehension. The writ petition being misconceived, it is accordingly dismissed. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)