WP 4110/10 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4110/2010 _______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Shri Sudhir L. Nandode, Advocate for petitioner. Shri A.B. Madke, Advocate for respondent no.1 (absent). Shri S.K. Tambe, AGP for respondent no.2. CORAM: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Date: 19.01.2011 Learned counsel for petitioner does not press this writ petition and seeks liberty to petitioner to file civil suit for appropriate relief as observed in para 8 of the impugned order dated 31.3.2010. He submits that petitioner will file civil suit within a period of six weeks from today. Till then, he submits that respondent no.2 be directed not to disburse WP 4110/10 2 the amount of compensation in favour of respondent no.1. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for petitioner so also the impugned order and the nature of controversy involved in this writ petition, I am satisfied that this petition can be conveniently disposed of by the following order. Petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed. Respondent no.2 or any other officer on his behalf is directed not to disburse any amount of enhanced compensation for a period of six weeks from today in favour of respondent no.1. It is open to petitioner to obtain appropriate interim order in the suit that he proposes to file. If petitioner files application for interim order / protection, same may be considered on merits in accordance with law. It is made clear that interim protection granted by this order for a period of six weeks is not granted on merits, but granted only to enable the petitioner to file suit and WP 4110/10 3 application for interim order. With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. (D.B. Bhosale, J.) Dt/- 19.01.2011 ndk/c191112