HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT B1LASPUR WRIT PETITION (8) No. 2063 of2009 PETITIONERS : 1. Puniram Namdeo 8/0 Stiri Nankiram Namdeo, Aged about 48 years, R/o village Anioda^ Tahsil Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2. Sundar Siiigli Sidai' S/o Cha^idati Sm^li, aged about 49 ycws. village Karrapali- Tahsil Sdkti, Distt. Jarygir-Champa (C.G.) 3. Irilochan Prasad Rathore S/o Shri Khamman Prasad, Aged 45 years, R/o village Saragaon, Talisil Baniliiiidyi, Distt. Janjgir-Chanipa (C.G.) 4. Premsingh Jagat 8/0 Shri ShyamsundCT, Aged about 50 years, R/o village Paterapali Khurd, Tahsil Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) \rERSUS RESPONDENT8 : 1. State of Chhattisgarb, tiirough Secretaiy, School Education Departiiieat Raipar (C.G.) 2. Deputy Director Sohool Educaticm FNistrict Janjgir- Ctiaiiipa. 3. Collector, District Jajnjgir-Champa (C.G<) 4. District Education Officar, Dis^tl. - Jaiijgir-Cliaiiipa (C.G.) WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmjHON QF ESTDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AsnUiotri, J. Present: Sliri Ashok Dubey, Advocate for fhe petitioii^rs. Shri M.P.8,Bhatia, Dy, Govt. Advocate forthe State/respondents. ORALORDER 2. 3. Amit (Passed on 20U1 day of April, 2009) Leamed coumel appearing tbr the petttioners, on instmotions, submits that the petitioners do not want to contest the petition on merits, however, the petitioners may be ^anted libtrty to make a rqpresentation m light ofthejudgment and order dated 7 September, 2006 passed in W.P.(S) No. 1588/2005 (Murli Prasad Kashyap and others v. State of M.P. & Others) (Annexure P/2) read with circular dated 09.06.2008 (Annexure P/3) for consideration befbre tfae concemed authorities. It is ordered. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as vsdthdravm with the above stated liberty. ——-~~~"~ Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge