.» ^ ...s^ss^ ^s^C^- IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASP'UR w-p-No-—l2006 PETITIONER :- Brij BhukhanS/oShriPawanSai, agedabout 40 years, S.E.C.L. Einployee, R/o village and Post Pandavapara Colliery, Disfrict Korea [C.G.] VERSUS RESPONDENTS -s^-,_.' "©[(OSfSE f -^ (1) Union of India, Through- The Principal Secretary of Minista-y of Coal, New Delhi. yi,UtE»^--,_ ^-^oral o( in Chief General Manager, South Eastern Coal fields Limited [SECL] Seepat Road, Bilaspur [C.G.]. ^",(3) Chief General Manager SECL, Baikunthpur, District Korea [C.G.]. (4) Sub Area Manager, SECL Jhilmili.Sub '•-' Area- Pandavapara Colliery, District Korea [C.G.]. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 /227 OF CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA XI-HC-22 STI^!^;! 'fei'paTS?! a>*J,i'=t> ^lfttt 'V^ -^WWti, WfllwflS, »^.^P;^y/ot, WW'iTWW si^iwnwafei 24,4,2006 Shri J'.K. Shdstri, AdyQ<|at€for Kie petitioner. Shri -5.K. Ber'wa!, 5r. •WfeqN tIilRlf •^feiZt ^; srfSgq. 311^1 Psme! Counse! takes notice on bshaif of respondent ^4o.i. Or. N.i(. Shukia, Si*. ^dvoco^s wift Shri Sunii Mera, Advocate directed to toike notice on beh^tlf of re^ondents No.2 +o 4. Heard. j • , The peTiTioner's case i^ Thsr he was cypointed on 22.6.2995 as Piece Rated Wortor (Loacler') |at -i+ie I'atc of fts.88.93 paise per doiy with 5pecia! Pi?ce feited aliowanes ]of Rs.4.24 paise. The petitioner was given wages at the is>t>ovs wite upto pl.OS.1998 and thereoftcr hw eategory hos oeen chemged from Piece Satdft Worker' to Time Rflted Worker from ihe montfi of Fsbruory, 1998. '?1i|e grievancs of 1fse petil-ioner is That aftsr •ttsa dionge of his ca*egory t|ie re^ondsnts are no* providina him •riie benefit of pay protection, wh^reos, as per- circular dated 17.2.1995 he is en+'+ted for Ihe samB and in t(iis Fegord, the pstj+ioner has made severai ppe^ntations to +he resporjdents but they are not paying any heea'+o the sarne. 1 Lcarned eounae| for the pe+itioner submitted +hat as per provisions of Section 33 of] tiie Industrial Disputes Aet alterndtive remedy is a'/ailable t" the pe^'tioner. but he prayed that the petitiongr may b®directeci to wake o<|e1ailed representation befor®respondent I • ,' [^^^ XI-HC-22 sn^i^"1 R;n?3ii^?i. 5tiH ^{Iia ftoshon/- 's^ ^mRpr, •a~atwT®,l^diyy ?nt?I'5«ITW^Hl5tI z- bk No.3 and in tum respondent J' representation in accordance wi-rti| Haying heord !samed coun^.1 the facts and tircumstances of for the petitioner cppecrs to the petitioner is aliowed -to resp'ondent Noi3 within ten day-s is directed to decide the with iaw within a period of three representatjon. Wi+h the cit'reetion aforesajd, LerTtTied copy as per ruies-j repres^n'i'ation '*iiid4i-f tipRn''? fwt <r-si^i< ^; •srfigit 3ilt?t [io.3 may b& directed to decicle the iaw. for the parties and having rsgard to Mie cass, the request made by counsel just, fair ond ressoncbte, •ttierefore, make a detaiied representation to from todny and in turn respondent No.3 :n+ation of The petitioner inaccordance mpnths from the date of receipt of the , the petition stands etisppsed of. L.C. Bhadoo Judge