IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32497 of 2008 1.KEDAR YADAV Son of Raju Yadav 2.Raju Yadav Son of late Anup Yadav All are resident of Village-Bhelaba-Mahanpur P.S. – Sone District – Jamui Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 384 of the Indian Penal Code The specific allegation is against the petitioners that they are involved in the alleged crime alongwith other co- accused. Learned counsel for the State submits that there is specific allegation against these petitioners that they alongwith other co-accused committed the alleged offence. Petitioner no. 1 pulled out the dragger and other co-accused snatched the money on the order of petitioner no. 2 Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly the same is rejected. Jagdish (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)