IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.453 OF 2009 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.453 OF 2009 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.453 OF 2009 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.9683 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO.9683 OF 2003 WRIT PETITION NO.9683 OF 2003 Adivasi Shikshan Sanstha through its Secretary Mr. Devram Munde..............Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtara & Ors.Respondents Shri A.A. Garge for the Petitioner. Shri Mandar Limaye, for Respondent No.2. Shri S.K. Chincholikar, AGP for Respondent State. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO CORAM : F.I. REBELLO CORAM : F.I. REBELLO J. J. J. DATED : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2009 DATED : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2009 DATED : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The petition was disposed of by order dated 2nd April, 2004 upholding the order of the School Tribunal. 2. The parties have now filed an Application wherein they pray to modify the order dated 2nd April, 2004 in terms of the consent terms at Exhibit "A" to the Application, which has been signed by the Secretary on behalf of the Applicant and also by Respondent No.2. The said consent terms are taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. 3. The relief as prayed for really cannot be granted. However, as the parties have arrived at settlement and as the Respondent No.2 has been reinstated there is no difficulty in accepting the consent terms whereby the Respondent No.2 has given up the claim for back wages. 4. In the light of the above the parties agree that the order of the School Tribunal has been complied with in terms of the consent terms filed before this Court and accepted by this Court. The Respondent No.2 gives up the right to back wages. 5. With the above observations Civil Application disposed of. (F.I.REBELLO, J) F.I.REBELLO, J) F.I.REBELLO, J)