IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.954 of 2009 SMT.RAM KUMARI DEVI WIFE OF LAXMAN SAO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-PAREO, P.S. BIHTA, DISTRICT-PATNA, PLAINTIFF NO.1 IN THE COURT BELOW. -PETITIONER Versus 1. SMT. MANORMA DEVI WIFE OF GAURI SAO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-PAREO, P.S.BIHTA, DISTRICT-PATNA, DEFENDANT IN THE COURT BELOW. 2. LAXMAN SAO, SON OF LATE MATHURA SAO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-PAREO, P.S.BIHTA, DISTT.PATNA, PLAINTIFF NO.2 IN THE COURT BELOW. -OPP.PARTY _____ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Sinha 3 02.02.2010 AAhmad/ After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that in view of the provisions as contained in Section 19of the Family Court Act, 1984 this Civil Revision may not be maintainable. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Civil Revision to avail any other remedy which may be available to the petitioner under law. In that view of the matter, this Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) 2