Civil Revision No.399 of 2009(O & M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.399 of 2009(O & M) Date of decision:27.01.2009 Munvar @ Munwwar Hussain .............. Petitioner Vs. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gurgaon and others .............Respondents Present: Mr. Vipul Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? -.- K.KANNAN, J. (ORAL) 1. The revision petition is against the dismissal of the petition seeking for withdrawal of the amount held in Bank deposit that represented the amount awarded in a Motor Accidents Claims case. 2. It was pointed out that the original Award passed by the MACT contained reference to deposit 75% of the amount in a nationalised bank and the 25% was permitted to be received in cash. No time was specified for the duration of the fixed deposit. The application was moved for withdrawal of 75% of the amount, which had been directed to be put in deposit but that was also dismissed stating that earlier there had been a direction for deposit. 3. The direction for deposit could not be for an indefinite period of time. The impugned order makes reference to the fact that on earlier occasion in 2007, a similar request was made and the Court had dismissed the same. A ground had been made out subsequently that the petitioners were requiring the amount for carrying on a business. 4. For the reasons stated in the petition for conducting a business, Civil Revision No.399 of 2009(O & M) -2- the petitioner is permitted to withdraw as claimed. Civil revision petition is allowed in above terms. ( K. KANNAN ) JUDGE 27.01.2009 A. KAUNDAL