ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2299 OF OF MOTION NO. 2299 OF OF MOTION NO. 2299 OF 2007 2007 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL MEMO (L) NO. 507 OF 2007 MEMO (L) NO. 507 OF 2007 MEMO (L) NO. 507 OF 2007 IN IN IN COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY PETITION NO. 777 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 777 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 777 OF 2006 IN IN IN COMPANY COMPANY COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 1044 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 1044 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 1044 OF 2006 Sakshi Ideal Investments and trading Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant. Vs. Kotak Mahindra Capital Co. Ltd. ...Respondent. Mr. A.A.Mirza for the appellant. Mr. Sandeep Parikh with Mr. Prashant Beri i/by M/s. BERI & Co. for respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2007 : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2007 : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the Notice of Motion and affidavit in support thereof. By this Notice of Motion, the appellant is seeking condonation of 70 days delay in filing the above appeal. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay in filing the above appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). ( 2 ) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)