1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.11.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN W.P.(MD)No.8196 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 Muthulakshmi Ammal ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Tahsildar, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District. 2.The Taluk Surveyor, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District. 3.T.Vijayakumar ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the land in Survey No.88/2B measuring about 1.54.00 hectares comprised in Patta No.3011 in consideration of the application of the petitioner, dated 26.07.2010. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai For R-1 and R-2: Mr.M.Alagathevan Special Govt. Pleader For R-3 : Mr.M.Saravanan *** O R D E R The petitioner has come up with the above writ petition seeking a Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the land. 2. Heard Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr.M.Alagathevan, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.M.Saravanan, learned counsel for the third respondent. 3. The only prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition is to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the land covered by patta No.3011. The respondents 1 and 2 have filed a counter affidavit. In paragraph No.4 of the counter affidavit, the respondents 1 and 2 have stated as follows: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 "It is submitted that on 26.08.2011 the land in Survey No.88/2B was measured by the Taluk Deputy Surveyor in the presence of one Mr.Sundar who is the son of the petitioner. He accepted the action taken in his mother's petition and gave his consent over it. As the request of the petitioner is conceded the Honourable Court may kindly ordered to be closed this writ petition." 4.However, the learned counsel for the third respondent submitted that any action taken by the respondents 1 and 2 should not prejudice the rights of the third respondent. But the fact remains that the prayer of the petitioner stands satisfied. It does not mean I am adjudicating the rights of the parties. Therefore, since the prayer of the petitioner stands satisfied, the writ petition is closed. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Regsitrar(AE) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Tahsildar, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District. 2.The Taluk Surveyor, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District. +One Cc to Mr.S.Palanivelayutham, Advocate, SR.No.39026 pm rl/4 c- 29.11.2011 W.P.(MD)No.8196 of 2011 16.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/