AB 2747/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. SARMA Heard Ms. R. Devi, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. B.S. Si nha, learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State of Assam. By this application the petitioner namely Jaminul Hoque has prayed for the pri vilege of pre-arrest bail. in connection with Barpeta P.S. Case No. 572/2011. u/ s. 366/376/372/34 IPC The allegation, made against the petitioner, is that, the petitioner, on being i nstigated by others forcefully took away the minor daughter of the informant and committed rape on her as a result of which she become pregnant. The victim girl was produced before the medical officer and the medical officer, who examined h er on 17.06.2011 opined that she was pregnant at the relevant time and her age w as in between 14 to 15 years. The said age was determined after radiological exa mination. The victim girl also, in her statement recorded u/s. 161 Cr.P.C., sta ted that she was forcefully taken to the house of the petitioner wherein, she l ived as husband and wife. She further stated that, after staying for a few days, the petitioner left her and that the members of the family of the petitioner co mpelled her to take shelter in her parents house. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for both the parties and also conside ring the materials, so far collected by the I.O., I do not think it to be a fit case for extending privilege of pre-arrest bail. Hence, the prayer for interim b ail is rejected. The interim order dated 23.09.2011 shall stand vacated.. The bail application is disposed of. Return the C.D.