BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fourth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.S.KARNAN CRL OP(MD) No.13470 of 2011 1 JAFFER @ S.JAFFER ALI [A1] 2 SHEIK BAREETH [A3] 3 MUSTAFA [A4] 4 ILIYAS @ MOHAMED RIYASDEEN [A5] 5 SHIEK @ M.J.SHEIK BAREETH [A8] 6 F.ABISHIEK [A9] 7 MOHIDEEN [A10] 8 ALLAUDEEN [A11] 9 SHEIK @ R.SHEIK BAREETH [A12] 10 YASAR ARAFAT [A13] .PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs STATE REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VEDASANDUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. CR.NO. 360 OF 2008 ... RESPONDENTS) / COMPLAINANT(S) For Petitioner : M/S. S.MUTHAL RAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294 (b), 336, 353, 332 and 506(ii) I.P.C. in C.C.No.53 of 2010 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur, Dindigul District. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners apprehend arrest on the ground of issuance of Non-Bailable Warrant. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that due to their illness, they were not able to appear before the trial Court on the date of hearing and as such, Non-Bailable Warrant was issued against the petitioners herein. The learned counsel for the petitioners further submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would oppose the move for anticipatory bail, since non-bailable warrant was issued against the petitioners. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the non- bailable warrant was issued against the petitioners, this Court is of the view that anticipatory bail could be granted to the petitioners with certain conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur, Dindigul District. on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned on all hearings. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 04/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VEDASANDUR. 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VEDASANDUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DIST 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. S.MUTHAL RAJ Advocate SR.No.34801. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13470 of 2011 Date :04/10/2011 2P/6C RPB : 07.10.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/