: il.3r-:?ji?^a (i^^^A^ ".^ COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BlLASFUR WRIT PETITION No. 2055 of200] PETITIONER : Smt. R. Tulsi Naidu W/o Shri R.S.Naidu, aeed 47 vears. R;o Kundum Badi, Karbala- Distt. Bi!aspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State Bank of Indore, Throueh Regional Manager, Regional Office, P^aipur. 2. Branch Manager, State Bank oflndore, Sirgitti Branch, Bilaspur (C.G.) 'ETITION UNDER ASJICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTIONAL LAW <M? T^TT^T A \-/r' ii^ii^i^. i3&S3.i T>,";sent: Sliri T.K.Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. <tB (Passed on 29m dav of Julv, 2009) tieard. 1. In this petition, the Detitioner seeks a lunited reliefthat the petitioner has nfft heard aa'l.'thing after tlie letter dated 24 Mav, 1 999 ifAmexure P;'6) of the respondents whereby tlie petitioner was infonne.d that the letter ofthe petitioner dated 28 April, 1999 was under mvestigation and he would bs aavisea in tne maner soon. 2. Without gome into the merits ofthe case, it is expected that ifrespondeat- Baxik has laken decisiosi, and not intimated the petitioner, the saiiie shal] be doae wi^ua a period oftwo weeks from today. Ifno decision has been taksn in that cass also, it is hoped that the decision shall be taksa at the earliest and the result shall be coiiaiiunicated thereon imniediately to the peimoner. 3. .WithtKe aforesaid directioiis, this petition is disposed of. However, iftlie respondents have any grievance against this order, they are at liberty to file an application &r review/modificatioa ofthia order. ,—_____ _ Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge