1 Cri-A-364-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 364 OF 2011 Sunil Chawla ... Applicant vs. Paul McGlade & Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani, Senior Counsel, i/b. Mr. Rahul Moghe,Advocate for the applicant Mr.Archit Jayakar i/b. Khaitan & Jayakar,Advocates for the respondent No.1. Ms. U.V.Kejriwal, APP, for the respondent No.2. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 25th April, 2011. P.C. 1. The applicant and respondent No.1, who is the original complainant are present in Court with their respective Counsel. 2. The offence was registered under Section 406 of IPC on the complaint of the respondent No.1. The parties made a statement that they have already filed the consent terms Exhibit "C" before the Special Court, Civil Judge, Goa and therefore the complainant/respondent No.1 has no objection to quash the proceedings. 2 Cri-A-364-11.sxw 3. In view of the consent terms, this Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) & (e) and stands disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)