IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CM No. 14391-CII of 2011 and C.R. No. 3530 of 2011 Date of decision: 1.6.2011 Jarnail Singh … Petitioner versus Gurjant Singh ... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. S.S.Salar, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: CM No. 14391-CII of 2011 : C.M. is allowed. Written statement is taken on record. C.R. No. 3530 of 2011: The present petitioner is the defendant in the suit for recovery titled Gurjant Singh v. Jarnail Singh. He is aggrieved with order dated 12.5.2011 passed by the Additional Civil Judge(Sr.Division), Gidderabaha, by dint of which his application for sending the disputed pronote and receipt to the Director, Government Printing Press, Nasik, for ascertaining the age of revenue stamps affixed and the signatures thereon, has been dismissed. Heard. A perusal of the written statement filed by the petitioner indicates that he denied his signatures on the revenue stamps affixed on the pronote and receipt dated 5.1.2003. It is not his plea in the written statement that his signatures were obtained by the plaintiff prior to the execution of pronote and receipt dated 5.1.2003. In back-drop of the said plea taken by him in the written statement, the learned trial Court has rightly dismissed his C.R. No. 3530 of 2011 -2- application. There is no infirmity in the impugned order. The revision petition stands dismissed. June 01, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE