1 W.P. 6955.2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6955 OF 2011 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders ................................ CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 17/12/2011. Mr. C.R.Thorat , Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. R.P.Phatake, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for State. ..................... PER COURT : 1. Vide the present Writ Petition, the petitioner impugns the entry of encumberance over his property pursuant to the order passed by the Tahsildar. 2. Mr. R.P. Phatake, the learned Assistant Govt., pleader submits that RRC is already issued against the petitioner in the year 2003 itself. The said order is appelable. The same is not challenged. 3. Mr. Thorat, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the same is behind the back of the petitioner. The 2 W.P. 6955.2011 petitioner was never given any notice of the alleged proceedings. 4. If the RRC is issued, then the petitioner has remedy of challenging the same in Appeal and raise all the contentions therein, so also can challenge the entry of encumberance by filing Appeal. 5. In view of the alternate remedy available, I am not inclined to entertain the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy against the RRC issued as contended by the learned Assistant Govt. Pleader and the entry of encumberance. All points are kept open. The authority shall consider the time spent in prosecuting the present Writ Petition. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ] KNP/W.P. 6955.2011