1 lpa 19-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 19 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2561 OF 2010 Ms.Shalaka Shekhar Soman ...Appellant vs. Sameer Sadanand Gadgil & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.R.V. Govilkar for the Appellant. Mr.M.N. Jain for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND U.D. SALVI, JJ. APRIL 29, 2011 P.C :- 1 Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2 This appeal is directed against the Order dated 13th December, 2010 passed in Writ Petition No. 2561/2010 whereby the learned Single Judge has rejected the writ petition at the stage of admission. Writ petition was directed against the 2 lpa 19-2011 order passed by the Co-operative Court and confirmed by the Revisional Court by which the petitioner s application for referring the disputed signature to the Handwriting Expert has been rejected. The application was filed on the basis of the order passed by the Court on 27th August, 2009 in Writ Petition No.4434/2009. 3 We have perused the said order. From perusal of the order, it is clear that this Court left it to the Co-operative Court to compare the signature and record its opinion about genuineness of the disputed signature at the stage of final judgment. It was further observed that if the Court finds any difficulty to express its opinion about genuineness of the disputed signature, that shall not preclude the Court from referring the disputed signature to the Handwriting Expert. Keeping that order in view and for the reasons recorded by the learned Single Judge, we find absolutely no merit in the appeal. 3 lpa 19-2011 4 Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Consequently, Civil Application No.55/2011 also stands disposed of. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (D.B. BHOSALE, J.)