1 spb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 01 OF 2009 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 19 OF 2009 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 929 OF 2008 Smt. Ganga Kishin Matai .. Petitioner. V/s. Mrs. Lina Rahul Parekh (nee Matai) .. Respondent. --- Mr. Dinyar D. Madon, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pradeep Bakhur and Mr. Ranjit i/by M/s. Ranjit & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Zal Andhyarujina, Mr. Jariwala and Ms. Jyoti Ghag i/by M/s. Thakore Jariwala & Associates for the Respondent. --- CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATED : 16TH JULY, 2009 P.C. : In view of the Consent Terms that have been arrived at between the parties in Misc. Petition No. 13 of 2009 in Test. Petition No. 929 of 2008, this Contempt Petition is not 2 pressed. Since the dispute has been amicably resolved it would be expedient in the interest of justice not to pursue the exercise of the Contempt Jurisdiction. The Contempt Petition is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed. (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) .....