IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.13808 of 2011 Date of Decision.02.08.2011 Sukerdeen son of Sadeek Mohammad, resident of village Bahartgarh, Tehsil and District Patiala and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab through its Home Secretary, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Punjab, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he will be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-5), which the petitioners have moved to the 2nd respondent, is duly considered and appropriate action is taken in the light of representation given. 2. It is hereby directed that the 2nd respondent-Punjab Wakf Board shall consider the representation and take appropriate action in the light of facts stated and after verifying whether there exists any encroachment in the property or not. The decision shall be taken within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 3. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 02, 2011 Pankaj*