1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2261/2008 (A.P.M.C. Malkapur vs. Sudhir Madhukar Kumre and others) CORAM : B.P.Dhamadhikari, J. DATE : 2 nd DECEMBER, 2008 Heard Advocate Shri P.C.Madkholkar, for the petitioner. Advocate Madkholkar states that the order impugned is ad-interim and was to operate till filing of reply. He states that he is representing a new body which has been elected and because of some dispute, the old body has taken a stand favourable to respondent. He, therefore, states that the petitioner should be permitted to file appropriate fresh written statement before the Labour Court. Advocate Shri S.V.Manohar, who appears for Respondent Nos. 1 to 16 in the matter has no objection to filing of such written statement by the petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent No.17 states that steps in accordance with law may be permitted to be taken. In the circumstances, the petitioners are permitted to file appropriate written statement raising necessary defence before the Labour Court. With this liberty, writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn as sought for by Advocate Madkholkar for the petitioner. JUDGE Rvjalit