CWP No. 23067 of 2010 and other connected cases 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 23.12.2010 CWP No. 23067 of 2010 Rita Roy ….. PETITIONER VERSUS Divisional Commissioner and others ….. RESPONDENTS CWP No. 23068 of 2010 Rita Roy ….. PETITIONER VERSUS Divisional Commissioner and others ….. RESPONDENTS CWP No. 23070 of 2010 Bharat Lal Maurya ….. PETITIONER VERSUS Divisional Commissioner and others ….. RESPONDENTS' CWP No. 23084 of 2010 Bharat Lal Maurya ….. PETITIONER VERSUS Divisional Commissioner and others ….. RESPONDENTS CWP No. 23092 of 2010 M/s S.S. Enterprises (P) Ltd. ….. PETITIONER VERSUS Divisional Commissioner and others ….. RESPONDENTS CWP No. 23067 of 2010 and other connected cases 2 CWP No. 23170 of 2010 Rita Roy ….. PETITIONER VERSUS Divisional Commissioner and others ….. RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: Mr. Jai Vir Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral) This order will dispose of six writ petitions i.e. CWP No. 23067 of 2010 titled as Rita Roy vs. Divisional Commissioner and others, CWP No. 23068 of 2010 titled as Rita Roy vs. Divisional Commissioner and others, CWP No. 23070 of 2010 titled as Bharat Lal Maurya vs. Divisional Commissioner and others, CWP No. 23084 of 2010 titled as Bharat Lal Maurya vs. Divisional Commissioner and others, CWP No. 23092 of 2010 titled as M/s S.S. Enterprises (P) Ltd. vs. Divisional Commissioner and others and CWP No. 23170 of 2010 titled as Rita Roy vs. Divisional Commissioner and others. Counsel for the petitioner submits that identical matters i.e. CWP No. 22962 of 2010 titled as Bharat Lal Maurya vs. Divisional Commissioner and others, CWP No. 23015 of 2010 titled as Bharat Lal Maurya vs. Divisional Commissioner and others and CWP No. 23028 of 2010 titled as M/s S.S.Enterprises (P) Ltd. vs. Divisional Commissioner and others, came up for hearing before this Court on 22.12.2010 when this Court was pleased to dispose them of with a CWP No. 23067 of 2010 and other connected cases 3 direction to the petitioner to deposit 50% of the demanded amount, as per Annexure P-5 and thereafter, the appeal of the petitioner shall be entertained. A further direction has been issued that the petitioner shall give a surety that in case the appeal of the petitioner is dismissed by the Appellate Authority, the petitioner shall deposit the remaining amount along with simple interest, as per the Act. In view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner, these petitions are disposed of in the same terms as CWP No. 22962 of 2010 titled as Bharat Lal Maurya vs. Divisional Commissioner and others, CWP No. 23015 of 2010 titled as Bharat Lal Maurya vs. Divisional Commissioner and others and CWP No. 23028 of 2010 titled as M/s S.S.Enterprises (P) Ltd. vs. Divisional Commissioner and others, decided on 22.12.2010. ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) JUDGE December 23, 2010 pj CWP No. 23067 of 2010 and other connected cases 4