IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 190 of 2007 Date of decision: 3.6.2008 Roshan Lal and Others. Petitioners. Versus Parma Nand. Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioners: Mr. Romesh Verma, Advocate. For the respondent No.1: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. Deepak Gupta, J. (oral) This petition is directed against the order dated 31st July, 2007 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Court No.2, Una, whereby she has directed that respondent No.1 (Roshan Lal, i.e. petitioner No.1 in the present petition) be sent to civil imprisonment. Though the petition has been filed by Roshan Lal and Smt. Roshni Devi, it is apparent only the petitioner Roshan Lal was aggrieved by the said order. Shri Romesh Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. states that he has instruction to state that Roshan Lal has expired. Keeping in view the fact that Roshan Lal, who was the only aggrieved party has expired, the petition does not survive, hence dismissed. The execution proceeding shall now proceed in accordance with law. 3rd June, 2008 (Deepak Gupta), J. ™