[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.491 OF 2007 Shri.Shivaji Mahadeo Arekar ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.Vijay Killedar Advocate for Applicant Mr.Rajesh More A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : APRIL 11, 2007 DATE : APRIL 11, 2007 DATE : APRIL 11, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.36 of 2006 of Shirol Police Station. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. The learned A.P.P. states that the evidence of all the witnesses has been recorded, so also, the statement of the accused under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. has been recorded and now the case is kept only for arguments before the trial Court. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant bail [-2-] to the applicant at this stage. Application is rejected. However, liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application for bail if the trial is not been concluded by 30.4.2007. 4. Application is disposed of. [ Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.]