IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.195 of 2008 SATISH KUMAR CHAUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the Appellant : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate ----------- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ----------- Dated, the 26th August, 2008. The appellant is the unsuccessful petitioner. He prays for scrutiny of answer-sheets for the examination held in the year 1995, the results of which were published in the year 1996. 2. The Single Judge dismissed the writ petition by observing thus: - “Rule 10 provides that any candidate aggrieved by his examination results may apply for scrutiny within 60 days in the prescribed manner by depositing the fee prescribed. It is not in controversy that no such application was ever preferred by the petitioner. He has instituted the present writ application in the year 2000 directly.” 3. For what has been observed by the Single Judge, it cannot be said that the writ petition has been wrongly dismissed. 4. L.P.A. does not deserve to be admitted. It is dismissed in limine. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J Pawan/-