IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42349 of 2008 RAVI PRAKASH SINGH @ CHUNNU SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 11.12.2008 Heard Sri Madheshwar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case is under Section 379 relating to theft of the motorcycle. The rejection order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge(F.T.C.3), Ara indicates as if the petitioner confessed about the selling of the theft property to one Mantu Kumar and accordingly Mantu Kumar was found riding around the motorcycle. The learned A.P.P. has read out to me some parts of the case diary which has been referred by the learned Judge in his rejection order and I find that there was no such material as indicated by the learned Judge. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Ara in Buxar Rail P.S.Case No.4 of 2008. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )