IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20658 of 2011 Tinku Shrivastava Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 18.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 18.3.2011 in a case registered under section 392 of the IPC against unknown persons. It appears from perusal of the impugned order that in course of investigation some witnesses claimed to have identified the petitioner in the alleged crime but in para 8 of this petition it has specifically been pleaded that when the petitioner was put on test identification parade, informant could not succeed to identify him. Although learned Addl. Public Prosecutor submits that petitioner has some criminal antecedent but considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Tinku Shrivastava, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champran in Pipra P.S. Case no. 91/2010. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)