AS 53/1999 1 / 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Present: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. Friday,the 9 th day of April 2021/19 th Chaithra, 1943 IA No.1/2021 IN IA No. 1126/2011 IN AS No.53/1999 OS No.25/1996 of the SUB COURT, VADAKARA PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT IN AS: 1. THAYULLATHIL DEVI, D/O MADHAVAN, AGED 75 YEARS, KARINJATTIL, KATAMERI AMSOM, DESOM, VATAKARA. RESPONDENTS/ APPELLANTS IN AS: 1 EENGATATHIL JANU, W/O KUNHIRAMAN, AGED 75 YEARS, THAYULLATHIL, AYANCHERY AMSOM, DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK. 2 KUNHIKANDIYIL DAMODARAN, S/O MADHAVAN, AGED 66 YEARS, MANDARATHOOR AMSOM, DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK. € Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to permit the petitioners to substitute Annexure A plan produced in I.A.No. 1126/2011 with Annexure A1 plan produced herewith and the decree may be corrected accordingly. This application coming on for orders upon perusing the application and the affidavit filed in support of and this court's judgment dated 11.04.2011 and upon hearing the arguments of SRI. R. PARTHASARATHY, Advocate for the petitioner/respondent in AS and of M/S PRABHA R. MENON, KODOTH PUSHPARAJAN, & M.KRISHNAKUMAR, Advocates for the respondents/appellants in AS, the court passed the following For information purpose only A.HARIPRASAD & ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., JJ. ------------------------------------- I.A No.1 of 2021 in I.A No.1126 of 2011 in A.S No.53 of 1999 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 9 th day of April, 2021 O R D E R A.Hariprasad, J, Heard both sides. 2. Prayer in the application reads as follows : “ For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit it is prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to substitute Annexure A plan produced in I.A No.1126/2011 with Annexure A1 plan produced herewith and the decree may be corrected accordingly. ” 3. This Court as per judgment and decree dated 11-04-2011 recorded the compromise and the appeal was allowed in terms of the compromise. For information purpose only I.A No.1 of 2021 in I.A No.1126 of 2011 2 in A.S No.53 of 1999 4. Learned counsel on both sides submits that there is an inadvertent mistake crept in the plan attached to the compromise petition. Now, they have produced a correct plan as Annexure A1 attached to this petition. After hearing the learned counsel on both sides, we are of the view that Annexure A1 plan shall be substituted in the place of the original plan attached to the decree. And the decree is modified to that extent. A.HARIPRASAD, JUDGE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., JUDGE amk For information purpose only I.A No.1 of 2021 in I.A No.1126 of 2011 3 in A.S No.53 of 1999 A.HARIPRASAD & ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., JJ. I.A No.1 of 2021 in I.A No.1126 of 2011 in A.S No.53 of 1999 Dated this the 9 th day of April, 2021 ORDER /true copy/ Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR For information purpose only