jpc aba408-11.sxw 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 408 OF 2011 Rashmi Suresh Chavan ... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondents Ms. Anjali Patil, for the applicant Smt. A.A. Mane, APP for the State CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 24th June, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. I have gone through the papers of investigation. It is clear that the first informant had dealings with the co-accused- Harshada Chavan. It is stated before me that the applicant who is sister of the said Harshada Chavan was present at the time, when some money was paid by the first informant to Harshada Chavan. This assertion, by itself, is not sufficient to show the involvement of the applicant in the alleged offence. The said co-accused, however, has been arrested and released on bail in due course. Considering all these aspects, an interim order of anticipatory bail was passed in favour of the applicant on 16th June, 2011. In the circumstances, the same should be confirmed. jpc aba408-11.sxw 2 3. The interim order of Anticipatory Bail, passed on 16th June, 2011, is confirmed and the Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of in terms of the said order. (A.M. THIPSAY, J.)