IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30975 of 2010 1. MAHANAND MANDAL 2. DEVANAND MANDAL BOTH SONS OF SAINI MANDAL 3. DIPU MANDAL @ DIPAK KR. MANDAL SON OF MAHANAND MANDAL, ALL RESIDENT OF CHAKLA NIRMALI, WARD NO. 6, P.S. & DISTRICT- SUPUAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 11.10.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The allegation is that the petitioner snatched the wrist watch of the informant while he was returning from tuition and abused him by his caste name. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to certain differences between the children while taking their tuition. It is further submitted that the allegation of abusing by calling the caste name is not attracting the alleged offence under the SC/ST Act. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 97 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)