IN THE HIGH COURT OS- JUDIC&TURB ; AT JABALPOR 6& W.P.NO. •3'Sy6 /1996 PETITIONER ?S^ri $y Humaalal Baghel, aged about 21 years, S/o Shri Sant Kumar Baghel, resident of village Khamtarai, Teb- Itondilohara, District - DURG. ,, -Versus- RESPONDEH'fS ^ • Collector (Panchayat). DURG, 2. Graia Panchayat, Khamtarai, Teh- Dondilohara, District - DURG. ^ 3. Chief Executive Officer, Jaapad Panchayat, Dondilohara, Dist.rict - DURG; 4. Ku.Neeliraa Deshmukh, D/o Vijay- Kzimar DeshmiiKh. Student,Govt. College, Dondilohara.Distt.DURG PETCTIOH UiSEDER ARTICLE 226 CONSTITUTIOK_OP ETOIA (in tbe prescribed E'ORM) o HICTiCOURT QP JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hoa'ble Shri Satish K. Agaihotri, J. W. P. No. 3690 OF 1996 Petitioner : Human Lal Baghel Versus Respondeats : Collector, Durg & others. ^;'l;SlS';!s;'!;S*ife' Fsri: ^•''''-^.^i^s-^S.' Shri Aiul Kuinar Pasdey, counsel for the petitioner. Smt Anju Ahuja, Deputy Governiaent Advocate for the respondents No.l and 2. Miss Siuuta Jain, counsel for the respondent No.3. ORAL ORDER (12th June, 2006) Leamed counsel for the petitioner on instruction, submits fhat the relief sought for in fhis petitioa, has already been granted, by the conceraed respondents and as such, this petition has becoine infructuous. Leamed counsel appearing for the .respondents have no objection. Accordingly, the petition is disinissed , having becouie infl-uctuous. Satish K.AgnihoW '.e c^' ITSZ ^