1 rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 856 OF 2010 Surekha Nana Wayle & Ors. ..Petitioners Versus The Hon'ble Minister, Revenue & Forest, State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Nitin Mulye for the Petitioners. Mr. R. M. Patne, A.G.P. For Respondent No.2. Mr. R. A. Thorat for Respondent No.3. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : JULY 7, 2010. P.C.: Heard Mr. Mulye and Mr. Thorat, the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. 2. This Petition pertains to recording of mutation entry. It is now settled position of law that mutation entry does not create or extinguish right of the party and the same is recorded only for fiscal purposes. The parties are always at liberty to 2 approach the Civil Court to get their dispute adjudicated. A reference can be made to the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Balwant Singh & Another V/s. Daulat Singh reported in 1997(7) SCC 137 . 3. In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to entertain the petition and interfere with the impugned order in writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. (R. V. MORE, J.)