IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19404 of 2009 AYODHEYA THAKUR @ RAM AYODHEYA THAKUR Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 10.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though petitioner has been named in the F.I.R., as assailant who shot firing which hit the victim also but only a simple injury was found by the Doctor. In course of investigation, allegation about firing was disbelieved by witnesses, rather charge-sheet submitted against co-accused Chandeshwar Rai only. Informant party was making every attempt to take possession over the petitioner’s land and to make otherwise pressure, petitioner has been involved in the case and he is apprehending his arrest. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 156 of 2001, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)