1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.404 OF 2010 Rajaram Yashwant Asolkar & Ors. .. Petitioners versus Dhondi Arjuna Magdum (since deceased) by legal representatives & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Tejpal S. Ingale for the petitioners. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 25th January 2010. P.C: . Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. By the impugned order dated 22nd September 2009, an application at Exhibit 76 has been allowed by the executing Court. The application at Exhibit 76 was made for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased decree-holder No.2. The only contention of the petitioners was that estate of the deceased decree-holder is represented. 2. No fault can be found with the impugned order by which the legal representatives of decree-holder No.2 have been brought on record. No interference can be made in writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Writ petition is accordingly rejected. (A.S.OKA,J)