IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 17TH JANUARY 2008 / 27TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 2117 of 2008(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- MRS. DEEPA RAJESH, AGED 25 YEARS, W/O. NAIK RAJESH, M.R. OF 203 ENGINEER REGIMENT, MEEDATHILKUDIYIL HOUSE, ANCHUKUNNU P.O., MANANTHAVADY TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.JOSE SMT.TESSY JOSE RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, NEW DELHI. 2. THE COMMANDING OFFICER, GAG BRANCH OFFICER, NORTHERN COMMAND, HEAD QUARTERS, KUPWARA P.O., SREE NAGAR, JAMMU & KASHMIR. 3. PROVOST MARSHAL, INTEGRATED HEAD QUARTERS OF MD (ARMY), 421-A, B WING SENA BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110 011. BY ADV. SMT.D.P.RENU,ACGSC, THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 2117 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 17th January, 2008 J U D G M E N T Having perused the averments in the writ petition and the nature of the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner, I am of the view that the entire cause of action as alleged in the writ petition has arise outside the jurisdiction of this Court. All the respondents have their normal place of office outside the State. In my view, this Court does not have jurisdiction to entertain this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It is upto the petitioner to move the appropriate Court. In the circumstances, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to do so, the writ petition is dismissed. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) ma K.THANKAPPAN,J CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999 ORDER 25th May, 2007