IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29452 of 2011(F) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- P.N.BINU,AGED 41 YEARS,W/O.P.P.RAJENDRAN PLAVINAKUZHIYIL,VETTOOR PO,PATHANAMTHITTA (HSA HINDI TEACHER,DBHS, VAMANAPURAM). BY ADVS. SRI. K.SHAJ SRI.SAJJU.S RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD SCHOOLS, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER (SECRETARY), PIN – 695 003. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ATTINGAL – 695 014. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MAVELIKKARA – 690 102. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANJIRAPPALLY - 686 018. 5. G.ABHAYAN, L.G.HINDI TEACHER, DEVASWOM BOARD HIGH SCHOOL,VAMANAPURAM- 670 911. 6. P.G.RAJANI,LG HINDI TEACHER, DEVASWOM BOAD HIGH SCHOOL,KANGAZHA- 670 911. BY SRI. M.A. FAYAZ, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.29452/2011 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER No.ROC 3706/EDN.DATED 31/01/2011 OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 26/7/2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT. EXT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 21/8/2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // P.A. to Judge. smp T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.29452 OF 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of November, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as H.S.A Hindi Teacher in the Devaswom Board High School, Vamanapuram managed by the 1st respondent. The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 1st respondent to take steps for regularising the service of the petitioner with effect from 15.07.2010 and also take steps for disbursing the salary and arrears from the said date. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the 2nd respondent may be directed to consider the grievance raised in Ext.P2 representation. It is upto the 2nd respondent to consider her grievance as raised in Ext.P2. This Court at this stage is not therefore considering the matter on merits. There will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the prayer made by the petitioner in Ext.P2 in accordance with W.P.(C) No.29452/2011 2 the Rules and pass appropriate orders, after hearing the petitioner and the Management, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp