1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.259 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3890 OF 2010 1) Chandrakant s/o Bhagwan Bagde, R/o­Balamtakali, Tq­Shevgaon, Dist­Ahmednagar and others. ...APPELLANTS. VERSUS 1) Pramod s/o Vishnupant Bedre, R/o­Balamtakli, Tq­Shevgaon, Dist­Ahmednagar, At present R/o­ Amalner (Bhandyache), Tq­Patoda, Dist­Beed, and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.Y.V. Kakade Advocate for Appellants. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2010. 2 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Appellants. 2. The Appellants challenge the order of learned Single Judge dated 11th August, 2010 passed in Writ Petition No.3890 of 2010. The counsel submits that in support of their case, good evidence was produced, inspite of the same, the Court negatived the contentions raised by the Appellants. 3. We have perused the order of the trial Court as well as the Order passed by the learned Single Judge. We have also gone through the mutation entries. At this stage, it is not necessary to enter into the question of fact as Suit is pending before the trial Court. The learned Single Judge expedited the hearing of the Suit before the trial Court filed by the Appellants with directions to simultaneously try the Suit filed by the Respondents. 3 4. We do not find any glaring error or apparent mistake on the face of record to interfere the impugned Orders. The Appeal is merit­less and deserves to be dismissed. The Letters Patent Appeal is accordingly dismissed. [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/SEPT10/lpa259.10