IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINTIAL Criminal With Petition No. 106 of 2009 Mahendra Nath Pandey & another. ……….. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …………. Respondents Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for respondent no.4. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for respondent no.4. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that as per instruction of the Investigation Officer, chargesheet has been field against both the petitioners before the circle officer concerned and the same is likely to be submitted before the court concerned in the near future, as such the petition has become infructuous. Mr. T.A. learned counsel for respondent no.4 has also filed a copy of the chargesheet alongwith his counter affidavit corroborating the aforesaid fact. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 26.02.2009 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 26.03.2009 V.K.