C.R.No.6083 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.6083 of 2009 Date of Decision : 22.10.2009 Roop Singh & other ...Petitioners Versus Gurdeep Singh ...Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned trial Court on 24.9.2009 impleading the Gram Panchayat as defendant No.2 in the suit for injunction filed by the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that the plaintiffs have not sought any relief against the Gram Panchayat, therefore, Gram Panchayat is not a necessary party. In fact, defendant is the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat and it is his interest to encroach upon the property adjoining to the property in possession of the plaintiffs and, therefore, to divert the attention of the Court, he has sought the impleadment of Gram Panchayat, as the defendant. The petitioners have attached jamabandi for the year 2004-05 as Annexure P-3 with the present petition. According to the jamabandi, entry in the column of ownership records Muafi Takiya under Nagar Panchayat. It, prima facie, shows that the Panchayat has the interest over the suit property being owner described in the revenue record. In view of the said fact, I do not find any patent illegality or C.R.No.6083 of 2009 2 irregularity in the order passed by the learned trial Court, which may warrant interference by this Court in the present revision petition. Dismissed. 22.10.2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE