IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17265 of 2011 1. Umesh Mahto son of Lachhaman Mahto 2. Lachhaman Mahto son of Bajnath Mahto, All resident of village Nunaura, P.S. Belsand, Distt. Sitamarhi …. Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 3.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Belsand P.S. Case No.39 of 2010 for the offences under Sections 341, 324 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Both the petitioners are named accused in this case with allegation of stabbing the informant from behind along with co-accused. Specific allegation of damaging throat of the informant by dagger. Specific allegation is only against non- petitioner and in fact no injury was caused to the informant. This is why till date no injury report could be obtained by Inspecting Agency. Learned Additional P.P., who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary upto paragraph 48 dated 30.7.2011 failed to refute such submissions. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the - 2 - satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Belsand in connection with Belsand P.S. Case No.39 of 2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J. )