SI^^LE H C p f-^ 2-'^ EN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRrTPETmONfS)No^9^ Of 2006 PET1TIQNER ..^f' .^4^ .^y/ ,u\,;'\-\>?' / ^^'v .^A^ ! 'ry tr--*' : ' Sukha Chand Patel, aged about 58 years, ^,, ;., .„ '^ .,, ' JP" S/o Late Shri Maimu Ram Patel, .^ >&"' A' ^?' ^ ^^ RESPONDENTS Assistant Grade III, Office of Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Raigarh, R/oRambhata, Tah. &Dstt.-Ra.igarh(C.G.) VERSUS 1. The State of Chhattisgarll, Through : The Secretary, Public Works DepartiTient, Mantralay,, D.K.S.Bhawm,RaiFiur(CG) 2. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division Raigarh, Tahsil aad District - Raigarh (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INDLA ^ .^^ .^ ,\\ ^ 7 ^^',o-^ ^A^ ^ ^^•' Sgs%(!(gg|@<#®sss«!s^^ HI6H COURT OF JUMCATURE CHHATTIS6ARH: BILASPUR Sirgle Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. (s) No. 4899 of 2006 Petitioner : Sukha Chand Patel Versus Respondents : The State of Chhattisgarh & onother t- <.< Shri Rakesh Anthony, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil t)ubey, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents. OR t)ER (Passed on 8th of September, 2006) 1. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged iegaiity of -ttie transfer order dated 6.7.2006 (Annexure P-1), whereby he has been transferred from Raigarh Division to Ambikapur Circle. 2. The main grievance of the petitioner is that he is working as Assistant Srade-m and the seniority of Assistant ©rade-III employees are being maintained circle wise and in support, a gradation list hos been enclosed as Annexure P-2, which has not been denied by learned Sovernment Advocate for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if the order impugned is allowed to be executed, then the seniority of the petitioner shali be affected, therefore, the petitioner may be allowed to make a detailed representation to respondent No.l and in turn, the respondents be directed to decide the same in accordonce with law. 4. 1-laving heard learned counsel for the parties and having regard to •the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, •the petitioner is allowed to make a detailed representation raising all his grievances to respondent No. 1 within 10 days from today along with <x copy of this petition & annexures. On such representation being filed the respondent No. 1 shall decide •the same within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the said representation in accordance with law after considering all the points raised by the petitioner. 5. In the meomtime, till the decision of the representation the effect and operdtion of the impugned order dated 6.7.2006 (Annexure P-1) in respect of the petitioner shall remain stayed. With the direction aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P. No. 3791/06 also stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. s^^ow judge Bablu