IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 383 of 2006 (S/B) Rajendra Singh Bisht. .……… Petitioner Versus Joint Director of Education & others. .………. Respondents. Mr. Gopal Narain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 4. Mr. C.K. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for respondent No. 3 states, that no process of selection in furtherance of the advertisement dated 05.05.2006 has been held till date. He further states, that as and when a fresh process of selection is to be conducted, the posts in question will be re-advertised. In view of the above, we are satisfied, that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. The same is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 15.06.2010 15.06.2010 G