IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 398 of 2008 Smt. Nirmala Devi and others ............... Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ............... Respondents Mr.Manoj Shah, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr.Manoj Shah, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners has now become infructuous as the present petitioners have not been chargesheeted, Since after completion of the investigation of the case, no prima facie case is made out against the petitioners and a final report is likely to be submitted before the court concerned in the near future. This fact has been indicated in Para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 23.05.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the final report before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 18.12.2008 V.K.