-^ l^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHATTISGARH) CiVILREVLSJQNNQ.7-^ /2006 PETITIONER/D^FENDANT <.k / RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF 1 ./..}-!t^--"" ...-^•^ <^^! >^y .DEFENDANT No. 1&2 Naresh Baid, Aged about 39 years • S/o Bhawar Lal Baid, R/o Sadarbazar, Rajnandgaon, Tah. & Dsst. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS Gomtibai, W/o Banwari Lal Sharma Aged about 35 years, R/o Mahukhurd, P.0. Mahukala, Gangpur City, (Rajasthan) Through the Power of Attorney holder Banwari Lal Sharma, S/o Kanhaiya Lal Sharma, R/o Mahukhurd, P.0. Mahukala Dist. Sawai Madhopur, Gangpur City (Rajasthan) 2. Jagdish Prasad Sharma S/o Dhansalsl Sharma Aged about 55 years R/o Bharkapara, Dist. Rajnandgaon, (C.G.) 3. Baisakhin Bai Sahu, W/o Dashruram Sahu, Aged about 98 years, R/o Hiramoti Line, Rajnandgaon, Tah. & Dist. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) REVISION PETITION UNDER SECTION 115 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908 XI-HC-78 «41*1^1 sb^lcb 75^ r^WW^, t$Tf1^ll<S, (ctdl^^< _c.^Ro^/^ ^rra? ^ 200 o ^l^^cb (^1 3TT^T^rf^ThF cW3TT^T$h^|cb Gopal ?^TTW^cTW^T 12-6-200S Mr Ravindra Agrawal, iearn^d counsel for the app!icant. The instant revlsion is dire^ passed in M.J.C.No.19/2004 by !ea| Learn-ed counse! .for the apj:| was earljer questioned by the def^| was registered as Civii Revision ^ by this Court at the motion stage lt| view of the above order, he does H(| The instant revlsion is dismN ^ted against the order dated 6-3-2006 (•ned Districtjudge, Rajnandgaon. ;|iicant submits that the impugned order ^ndant Jagdish Prasad Sharma, which |o.57/2006 and the sarne was rejected it|se!f vide order dated 27-4-2006, and in M Dress the. instant revision.. tsed as not pressed. Gbi^F<n41Ti ^i^QiT^'te^'<Ri«i< ^3Tf^T3T1^T Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^