IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37464 of 2010 CHANDAN SAO @ CHANDRA KUMAR SAO SON OF INDRADEO SAO,R/O VILLAGE- LADU, P.S.- BARACHATTI (MOHANPUR), DISTRICT- GAYA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 18/03/2011 Heard Mr. Kumar Dhirendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner is sole named accused of the case registered under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant’s wife was mother of three children. The informant went outside for earning his livelihood. His wife developed intimacy with the petitioner and was eloped. Subsequently it was alleged that she was burnt. She was admitted to hospital but she died. Submission is that the case was lodged on account of confusion and when the informant knew the truth then he filed a petition saying about the innocence of the petitioner. The informant himself is not the witness of the occurrence. The entire allegations are on the basis of conjectures. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten 2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M./concerned Court, Sherghati (Gaya) in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 140 of 2010. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) avin