-2- PETITIONER fe^Sy^^ ^Ayodhya Prasad Yadav S/o Goverdhan Pra^ad Yadav, aged about 26 yesrs, S./0 Lovmiurha, Tah. Jashpur, P.S.H. Sanna, Dist-t. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS ^'_^ RESPOHDENTS^ , -3.:l*i,^S'tat-e of Chhattisgarh -.<»" ^J.-vTJ'tol '^'^'^3^ Through The Ghief Secretary -..•••''"'.n-i'-tl-''''''^ ' School Education Departmen *'" ....!,'^'-f ';<r,".^ • ' I.u!''"! Raipur (C.G.5 2. Ghief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Manora Distt.'Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Sarpancti, Gram Panchayat- Gidha Janpad Panchaya't< Manora Dis-tt. Jashpur (G.G.) WRIT PSTITION UNDER ARTIGLE 2267227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. K ;: !';;!a;tSfai»ii»itit. as-asie. €\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2007 of 2001 Petitioner: Ayodhya Prasad Yadav Versus Respondents: State of Chliattisgarh & others Single Bench: Hon^le Mr. Justice Satish K. AgBihotri. Shri. Viaay Paudey, Advocate for the petitiouer. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Paael lawyer for the Respondent No. 1. Shri DeepaJi Gupta, Advocate for fhe Respondent No.2. Shn Raghavendra Venna, Advocate for fhe Respondent No,3. ORAL ORDER ( 14A Februaiy, 2006) The foUowiag order offhe Court was passed by Satish K. Agnlhotri, J. 1. The petitioner was selected for traming as Shiksha Kanni vide order dated 18.2.1997 (Aunexure P/1) for iindergoing the trainiag Hi Basic Traiaing Institute, Jashpurtlgar, District- Raigarh. Thereafter fhe petitioner was appointed as Shiksha Karmi by Gram Panchayat Geedha, Block - Manoia, District- Raigarh vide order dated 1.3,1997 by the Respondcnt No.3. The petitioner was reinoved froin service on 30.6.1999. 2. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, leamed Panel lawyer appearing for fhe Respondent No. 1, per contra, subiuits fhat fhere is a provision of statutor5r appeal against the order of Sarpanch as per Clause 5.1.6 of the education guarantee scheme, nnder Rajiv Gandlii Shiksha Mission, 3. In view ofthe fact that fhere is a provision offhe statutoiy appeal, this petition is disnussed with Uberty granted to thfi petitioiier to| file an appropriate proceediags before fhe appropriate autthority inj 6^- accordaace with law. In the event the appropriate proceeduig is initiated within a period of two weeks froni today, fhe question of licnitation wffl not come in the way of fhe petitioner and the appropriate authority will decide the appropriate proceeding ivithin a period of six weeks froia the date of fiUng of the appeal/iepresentation, ifaay. 4. In view of the foregoing, the petition is disinissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- Sadsh K. Agnlhotri Judge Thakiir