—— 1 ^ In the Honble Hish Court of Chhattishsarh at Bilaspur (C.G W.P.No ..............^70............. 200^' 'L\sh^ Petitioner .....i...../p..............,./?...yb-^Tooman®iTaramt>^ged52years 5 '> ^'^l/" ' Son ofBhanjansingh, Patwari, P C No.18. .l..-^'?^-^"'" Village Suwarbod, Tahsil Dondilpham__. ^ ^ Village District Durg(C.G.) Versus Respondents ........................../. 1. State Govemment of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, R evenue Department Ministry, ^^Y\ D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ ' ,\ \ ^^ 2. The Sub Divisional Officer, -^^ Balod, District Durg (C.G.) ^ Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndia. -3^ ^TFT^zr, ^t^^ 'i^imy ^^.f:......^o./.^0.^...r. ^l 1 -H fe^t if^eR ^ Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel f< Shri Akhil Agrawal, P.L.for the S The petitioner has preferred transfer order of Annexure P/1 by wh at serial No. 14 on the above order ha- District-Dantewada. tfris Learned counsel for the petiti^n petitioner who is a Patwari are gov^r Manual and as per Clause-7 of th4 subjected to transfer from one Patwai}i concerned Sub-divisional Officer or division by the order of Collector transfer of Patwari from one District counsel submits that for maintaining the tahsil and it cannot be from one wiil adversely affect the seniority of submits that that ends ofjustice will bi to make a detailed representation bej grievances raised in this petition with a| the stipulated time. 1 have heard learned counsel fo Considering the submissionsj opinion on the merits ofthecase, 1 ar|i will be served if a direotion is giverj >r the petitioner. ate/respondents. petition as he is aggrieved by the |ch the petitioner whose name appears been transferred from District-Durg to ler submits that the services of the /^rned by Part-1 M.P. Lands Records above Manual, the Patwari can be circle to another Patwari circle by the rom one sub-division to another sub- c^ncerned and there is no provision of |o another District. Therefore, learned seniority list transfer is made within District to another District as the same petitioner. Learned counsel further sen/ed if the petitioner is given liberty |fore the State Government raising his jdirection to dispose of the same within tlie tlie the respective parties. made and without expressing any of the opinion that the ends ofjustice to the petitioner to make a detailed GRPPJ-—FS/350--12/2000—50,000. m IN? ^ 'r j ^£r•^T7Tf^R, ^Tft?T-r^, •^nTfy K^s' representation raising his grievance^ respondents along with the copy of and on such representation beingj respondents shall decide the same as early as possible preferably within receipt ofthe representation. thls 0| Learned counsel for the petitiojner been relieved and therefore, he mayj placeofposting. till the representation is decided. It disposed of. •^pfe^-HR^f^ ftt^ T^^ ^ before the competent authority of petition and this order within 15 days made the competent authority of its own merits in accordance with law period of two months from the date of submits that the petitioner has not be allowed to continue in the present It is directed that if the petiti^ner has not been relieved and other person has not joined in his ptace, th4 petitioner may be allowed to continue s made clear that if the petitioner has already been relieved or other pers<j>n has already joined in place of the petitioner, then this order will not enti|le the petitioner to rejoin at the earlier place ofposting. With the above observations, th^ petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P.No.67^005 and I.A.No.197/2005 stand Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge GRPRJ—-FSS50-. -.. 12/2000—50,000. \^.^