IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A.F. NO.2072 OF 2010 AND C.A.F. NO.2073 OF 2010 AND C.A.F. NO.2074 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1153 OF 2007 (V.I.D.C. LOWER WARDHA PROJECT...VS.. NATTHUJI NARAYAN SONTAKKE & OTH.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. A.V.Palshikar, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Tushar Darda, Advocate for Respondents No.1(a) to 1(d). Mrs. Bharti Maldhure, A.G.P. for Respondents No.2 & 3. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 09, 2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Though the learned counsel for legal representatives of respondent No.1 opposes the prayer made in the civil application, for the reasons stated in the civil applications No.2072/2010 and 2073/2010 the delay in filing the application for bringing legal representatives on record is condoned and the abatement is set aside. All the three civil applications are allowed and disposed of. Necessary amendment should be carried out within a period of two weeks. JUDGE RR.