IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5144 of 2009 Ram Kumar Pandey, Son of Late Thakur Pandey, resident of Village- Suryapura, Post office and Police Station- Suryapura, District- Rohtas………………………………………………………….Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bikramganj, District-Rohtas. 3. The Officer-in-charge, Suryapura, Police Station, District-Rohtas. 4. Ganesh Tiwari, Son of Late Radha Bihari Tiwari, resident of Village- Surapura, Post Office and Police Station-Suryapura, District- Rohtas…………………………………………………….Respondents. 2. 06.09.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The present writ application has been filed for a direction to the respondent authorities not to interfere with the right, title, interest and possession of land detail descriptions of which have been given in paragraph no. 4 of the writ application. The counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no.2 reflects that interfere was made in pursuance to an order passed in Case No. 752(M) of 2007 by the Sub Divisional Officer, Bikramganj, in exercise of power under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that order 2 passed in 144 Cr. P.C. proceeding has been challenged in Criminal Revision. In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to interfere. Accordingly, the writ application is disposed off. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)