IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND NINE ONLY WRIT PETITION No.23027 of 2006 Between: Smt.P.Susanna Supriya. … Petitioner And The Police Commissioner, Hyderabad City Police, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad and two others. . … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: None Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Home for R.1 and R.2. None for respondent No.3. This Court made the following: ORDER:- At the interlocutory stage, this Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner questioned the inaction of respondent No.2 in arresting respondent No.3 in connection with Crime No.689 of 2006 of Chilakalaguda Police Station. In the separate counter-affidavits filed by respondent Nos.2 and 3 it is, inter alia, stated that the Police arrested respondent No.3 on 13-11-2006 and produced him before XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad on 14-11-2006 in connection with Crime No.689 of2006; and that, therefore, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. No reply affidavit is filed by the petitioner controverting these averments. In view of arrest of respondent No.3, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.29332 of 2006 is dismissed as infructuous. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:22-6-2009 MNR