IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7294 of 2009 1. Kunti Devi, wife of Late Kesho Sah, 2. Laddu Sah, son of Late Kesho Sah, 3. Manjeet Singh, son of Late Kesho Sah, all of village Karup, PS Sheosagar, district Rohtas. 4. Sukhu Sah @ Satyanarayan Sah, son of Rogi Sah, resident of village Mahuli, Ps Kargahar, district Rohtas – petitioners. Vs. 1. The State of Bihar, 2. Satyanarayan Sah, son of Late Jagarnath Sah, village Karup, PS Sheosagar, district Rohtas – opp. parties. 2 16.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This application has been filed for quashing the order, dated 24.11.2008 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sasaram in Complaint Case No. 61©/2008. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the witnesses are minor and as such the court ought not to have recorded their evidence. In the order sheet it has been mentioned that the court has ensured that the witnesses were capable of understanding the questions put to them and given their evidence. In the circumstances I do not think that there is any merit in the issues raised on behalf of the petitioners. This application is dismissed. haque (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)