HI^H COURT OF CHHATTISeARH. BILASPUR f5ina!e Bench: Hon'bSe Mr. Justice Dh'rendra Mishray W.P.Cc) No.6959/2009 (Pstition under Article 22& of th®Constitution of India) Petjtiorser Vs Respondents Tandon Das, ^on of Shri Latei Das, aqed about 40 ycars, OccupQtion-Pernianent Kotv^cr at Village Kharora, R/o Village Khorora, Tahsii and District AAahasamund (CG) 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Throuqh the Secretar/, &epcirtn<erst of Revenue, &KS Bhawon, Mantraiaya, Raipur (C6) 2. CoiSector, Mohasamund, Djstrlct Mdiasamund (ce) 3, Sub &jvisionGS Offlcer (Rev), Mahasamund, District AAahasamund (C6) 4. TahslSdar, MGhasos'nund, &lstrict Mahasamund (CG) Present: Mr. Ami Mourya. Advocate nakur, Panei Lawyer Mr.S For the Dctitioner. For the respondents. ORAL ORDER (Pssssd on 30th NQ"emb®r,2009) L The petitsoner has fiied the instant petition and prayed ror direction to the respondent authorities to arant Bhuimswami riaht in respect of the lands recorded in Jama Bandi (Annexure P-l) In favour of the petitioner\ 2. Learned counsei for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is persmanent Kotwar of ViJiage Kharora, Tahsii & District Mahasamund. He became permanent Kotwar after 1tie death of his father Latel Das in the year 1985, He has aJready applied for conferrd of Bhumiswami riahts over the service land ailotted to the Kotwar of the said viiiage before the respondent No.3Ba5,D,0. (R), however, the said appiication has not decided tili date. He further submits that the petitioner is not pressing this petjtion at this stage on merits, however, he rrsay be permitted to file fresh representation for the reijef which he has cialmed in this petition before the respondent No.3, who, in turn, may be directed to decide the representatson in accordance with iaw. 3. Mr. Thakur. learned Panel Lawyer for the State submits Itiat if the petitioner fiies fresh representation along with necessary documents Page2 for redressd of his arievances, raised in this petition, before respondent No.3, the same shaii be considered and decided by the respondent No*3 in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks. 4. In view of the submjssions made by tearned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of with direction to the petitioner to fife fresh representation before respondent No,3 within ten days from today, abng with relevant documents and certified copy of this order, for redressal of his grievanees raised in this petition. On such representation being made, respondent No.3 is directed to decide the m accordance with Jaw within a period of eiaht weeks from the date of r-eceipt of representation. Cer3tifled copy as per rules, Dhirendra Mishra Judge