GPN-J-332-ARHCB-8_94-13,10,500-ALA4. SPL.H.C.A.S.C.D. 79e. FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 282 OF 2002 WRIT PETITION NO. 282 OF 2002 WRIT PETITION NO. 282 OF 2002 Sou.Kalavati D. Bobade ...Petitioner versus Dattatraya Bapu Bobade & anr. ...Respondent. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada Court‘s or Judge‘s orders or directions and Orders. Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Surol S.Shah for the petitioner Shri Vijay Killedar for Respondent no.1. Shri A.M.Shringarpure APP for State CORAM; CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. V.G. PALSHIKAR, J. DTAED; DTAED; DTAED; 20TH JUNE, 2005 20TH JUNE, 2005 20TH JUNE, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge in allowing the revision application and modifying the order of maintenance made by the learned Magistrate under section 125 of Cr.P.C. The reasons given by the learned Judge for so interfering are neither illegal nor perverse. The petitioner had adequate remedy under the Act of 1956 to claim higher maintenance than permissible under 125 Cr.P.C. In that view of the matter, I see no reason to interfere. Hence petition is dismissed. ....