IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44502 of 2009 MATIUR RAHMAN @ MD. MOTIUR RAHMAN Versus 1. The STATE OF BIHAR 2. Bibi Sabnam Ara ------ 6/ 29.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Alleged torture is for demand of money is denied. Initiative was there by this Court even to reconcile the differences if was only for payment of money did not resolve and according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, if it had been due for payment that would have come to an end but differences are otherwise for matrimonial cause and none is more responsible. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 75 of 2008 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saharsa subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)