IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 22N[) DAY AUGUST, 2011 PRESENT THE HON’E.LE MR. JUSTICE VC. SABHAHIT AND THE HON’BLE MRJUSTICE B. MANOHAR OO6 BETWEEN: 1. SMT NACAMM A W/O SRI HUCHANNAVARA HANUMANTHAPPA ACED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 2. SRI K NACARAJ 5/0 SRI HUCHANNAVARA HANUMANTHAFFA ACED ABOUT 30 YEAR S. 3. K RAJ SHEKAR 5/0 SRI HUCHANNAVARA HANUMANTH AFPA ACED ABOUT 28 YEARS. ALL ARE ACRICU LTURISTS, R/O. MADIRE VILLAGE, BELLARY TALUK AND DISTRiCT5S3 101. APPELLANTS (BY SRLSWYADRAMI. SRI. H. KANTHARAJA AND K.RLiNCARAJU, ADVOCATES ABSENT) A.ND: SMT CAN T CAMIvIA S 0 uATE Ri RAMANACOUDA MAJOR -2- 2. SRI YERRISWAMY 5/0 LATE SRI RAMANAGOUDA, MAJOR. 3. SRI SANNA YERREGOUDA 5/0 LATE SRI RAMANAGOUDA, MAJOR. 4. SRI M MALLIKARJUNAGOUDA 8/0 LATE SRI RAMANAGOUDA, MAJOR. 5. SRI M JADEGOUDA S/0 LATE SRI RAMANAGOUDA, MAJOR. 6. SRI M VENKANAGOUDA S/O LATE SRI RAMANAGOUDA, MAJOR. ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS, R/O. MADIRE VILLAGE, BELLARY TALUK AND DISTRICT-583 101. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.GODE NAGARAJ AND SRI. L.R.ALAGWAD, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 TO R-6) THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15/07/2006 PASSED IN O.S.NO.292/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) BELLARY, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, V.O.SABHAHIT.J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The matter was called out. Counsel for the appellant is ab sent. No representation inade. Counsel for respondents 1 to 6 is present. Even the paper book is not filed. H enee, the appeal is dismissed for nonproseeution. JUDGE Sd/ JUDGE kmv