1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4253/2008. Smt.Chand Kumari. VERSUS Civil Judge (JD), Bundi and Others. 06.04.2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Ashwani Chobisa, for the petitioner. ***** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner filed a suit for permanent mandatory injunction seeking a direction that his application for the grant of mining lease for sandstone dated 10.07.1981 be ordered to be decided by the authorities. The aforesaid judgment and decree are Annexure-3 on record. It is not in dispute that vide order Annexure-6 dated 06.11.2007 the application submitted by the petitioner dated 10.07.1981 has been dismissed by the Additional Director (Mines). The order (Annexure-6) has been challenged by the petitioner before the Deputy Secretary (Mines), State of Rajasthan and the appeal submitted by the petitioner was dismissed by the State Government. Against the dismissal of the appeal as well as the order of rejection of the application, the petitioner has filed a writ petition before this court which is said to be pending. 2 The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner had submitted an execution application for execution of the decree (Annexure-3) before the learned executing court seeking a direction against the respondents for deciding his application in accordance with law. It is submitted that the application which was decided by the order dated 06.11.2007 has not been decided in accordance with law and, therefore, the decree has not been complied with. I am of the view that in the facts and circumstances of the present case, since the matter is already pending before this court in the writ petition filed by the petitioner against the order of rejection dated 06.11.2007 and the order dismissing his appeal by the State Government, the remedy for the petitioner lies in the writ jurisdiction in which he has challenged the aforesaid orders of rejection and the dismissal of the appeal. Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed summarily as having no force. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.