1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Second day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.10890 of 2011 1 A.THAVASI @ KUMAR 2 T.ANANTH ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 & 3 Vs THE STATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOODANKULAM POLICE STATION, TIRUENVELI DISTRICT. CR.NO.128 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. D.VENKATESH Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, additional Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 3 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b) & 506(ii) IPC r/w Section 3 of the TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.128 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners were charged under Sections 147, 148, 294(b) & 506(ii) IPC r/w Section 3 of the TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.128 of 2011 and this Court has already granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.9570 of 2011 on condition that they have to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/-. He further submits that the other accused namely A2 is not cooperating with these accused in depositing the said amount as ordered by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD)NO.9570 of 2011 dated 29.07.2011 and also the concerned learned Judicial Magistrate is insisting that he would enlarged the petitioners on anticipatory bail only if the other accused is paid and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side). 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and as per the version of the learned Counsel for the petitioners, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail on condition that each of the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.17,000/- to the credit of Crime No.128 of 2011 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor and on receipt of the same, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 Magistrate concerned and each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 22/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VALLIYOOR. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOODANKULAM POLICE STATION, TIRUENVELI DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. D.VENKATESH Advocate SR. No.28424 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10890 of 2011 Date :22/08/2011 RJ/24.8.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/