IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5658 of 2010 1. SHYAM SUNDAR JHA S/O LATE RAJDEO JHA R/O VILL.- KAKNA, P.S.- PANDAUL, DISTT.- MADHUBANI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. VICE CHANCELLOR, KAMESHWAR SINGH SANSKRIT UNIVERSITY KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA 3. REGISTRAR, KAMESHWAR SINGH SANSKRIT UNIVERSITY, KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA 4. SECRETARY, KAMESHWAR SINGH SANSKRIT UNIVERSITY, KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA 5. COMMISSIONER, HIGHER EDUCATION GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, BIHAR, PATNA 6. SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA 7. SECRETARY RAJESHWAR THAKUR SANSKRIT COLLEGE GODDHIYARI, RAGHOPUR, DARBHANGA ----------- 2 05/01/2011 A batch of writ applications filed as far back as in 1991 till 1995 all came to be clubbed together, heard together as well as decided together by virtue of a common order dated 25.06.2003 which is annexure-6 to the writ application. In all these writ applications a common prayer was that based on the Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of Braj Kishore Singh Vs. State of Bihar reported in 1997(1) PLJR, 509 as well as the so called staffing pattern on the recommendations made by various Universities, State was to sanction the posts and regularize the services of - 2 - the employees. Particular direction was issued to complete the exercise within a time frame and that direction was carried out by the State vide notification dated 05.06.2006 contained in annexure-7. Some of the employees who were petitioners before the High Court came to be regularized. Petitioner now claims that he too is one of those persons who is working since 1982 and deserves to be regularized. This Court has difficulty in giving any direction at this stage because entire exercise at the behest of the High Court has been completed in 2006 in view of the decision rendered in 2003. There is no indication as to why petitioner chose not to join other persons or approach the High Court within a reasonable time frame for seeking same kind of relief. Such a belated writ application after all exercises having already been completed is difficult to be entertained and no direction at this stage can now be issued to consider the case of the petitioner after so many years when initial exercise for regularisation of those employees who figured in the rolls had already been carried out and their services - 3 - regularized which would be evident from the notification contained in annexure-7. This Court cannot pass any direction now at this stage. This writ application is thus dismissed. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)