: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.24 OF 2005 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.500 OF 1989 Shri Raosaheb Anand Shinde .. ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra .. ..Respondent Mr.P.L.Naik for petitioner Mr.A.R.PATIL, AGP for respondent CORAM : P.V.KAKADE, J. DATE : 16TH DECEMBER,2005 P.C.: 1. Heard both sides. 2. Rule, rule made returnable forthwith by consent. 3. On perusal of the record it is seen that the judgment and order passed by this Court on 22nd September, 2005 in Second Appeal No.500 of 1989 is sought to be reviewed on various aspect, however, after hearing the learned counsel for the Petitioner I am satisfied that there is no error apparent revolved from the record nor there is any other ground to review the : 2 : judgment, especially when all the factual and legal aspects are taken into account, which are seen to be proper and correct. Under the circumstances and without further elaboration, I record the finding that the review petition is devoid of any merits and stands dismissed.