"\ .y 'te^' •i£: r! PETIiaONER •^./^ iiW^ IN THE HIaGH e@ylffi?@eaiymi!e^TU»EAt CMHAaTlSGARU ::''.:®iH MiRUK::''".- :^':.:'/ ^ •i".^::.::.1' ' V»RtTI>Era'ia@NNO.?&So/2004 r^ WERSUS <8^P. Sahy,^geslja|bout- 4t ^rs., S/^ §BH PtR. ^ahu,'. -::: '•^•pilesienfl^^ working as Syb- Engiiieer,;^ ;;,R|o;;' :—^ .BIia^clgrRleiga,^^,,, ,^:' Taip^ara, :j;:l::.:^?jielgsH-; .ktin^kari, : ;;,:;:r^.;|i|>|r||||-; Jashfiyi-, CtiKa^isil^FUi.: i REiSBONBEN^^.;.5:' State.of.':,' :;. ':::'-'l .:,l:; tMiattigarh,'riaefU^|BN Secretaty,;Ii)epart|[iSM|cJ)?l !!ii. Put»lie:'W<»ks,^^j(|s^EBmeg(|(jg;, ClihdaisgarU,:I|^S|E Maatralaya,RaiBB!c,; €Khattisgad. : GOIteetor, .;;^.i^j|Ejj|j; ,3ashpuij,-G(ittatJt|i|||.j :SuB-Diyi:siQiri|l-CTfl!(|i|i|f 7Depa^rtijrie!ntj|a§l|H|il|;j|^i VS/OFks^i^uB||E>Jii}ja||ji" fKu; kuin,:]3|i||ji|t|||;||-': JasKpi.tf,1 c:H|)at!sgi|^i. Slljpenntencleriti 'Ene|ineeei|^j|;l:]i,:'li [^Rartjme;n|..^|^,|: QfJFjuMicWoFfcs,;! BilagRur,DisNi<j:tS ;:i Biiaspur, eNlT^lttiyEicfi. s! WTOTl J1^lE>NlEM<iBiliiiil© :3SHa@BIBItBaBBB13!l;!E3B:IBfl''!' aBgWSfiMKloa^; si^ I'SRs (:;•;•• •p:;'f .{.-...-U.—J-- ^L-:?^ ^^.T^WS<?% '®^RpTS;^^lj*t^< ....4^^CNo'...N.afiif.i %r'??i^(1 a which .hib' 31/01/2005 Shri Saajay K. Agiawal, Shri Viaod Shrivastava, Heard on I.A. No. aUowed. . The petitioner has order of AnnexuTe P-1 by suspen.sioa for not joining iti Leamed couiisel for the| was traiisferred vide order d^ work ia his earUer place of aad he has been placed ia sus relieved froni Kuilkuri to ia earlier place of postiag tfll l^ leaye on niedlcal grounds. Leanied eouiLsel for fhe has been put in suspensioir Annexure P-1 on the ground of posting at Bilaspur. He detailed representation dated the respondent No. 1/State ofC| R.W.D., biit thei same has n^ counsel ,for llie respoiulent | a^grieved by fhe order of departiiiental appeal as pi<|: c^unsel for tbe petitioner. O.A. forthe State. for urgent hearing. It is 993f/2004 prefenj-ed pcjstia| Bilasijiur q<i<ila<lliownfii ^ '^^R ^aflNailSw^ ^—,; fhis instant petition against the the petitioaer has been put ia transferred place of posting. I petitioner submits that though he l^ted 08/09/2004, he contmued to pc|stmg i.e. Kunkuri tiU 19/10/2004 t>ension on the pretext fhat he was is^iur. However, he contuiued to work l^/10/2004 and thereafter he was on petitloner further subinits that he fc^r non-coilipliauce of the order vide tljiat Ite did not join. in his new place filrflier subinits fhat he has m.ade ^3/12/2004 vMe Aanexure P-16 to ,G. through the Secretaiy, Deptt. Of bt been decided tUl date. ILeamed Isiibinits that if the petitusiiier is p^nsion, he ought to have prefeiTect a suspqnsion vided uiider Rule 23 o,f Gi: PRJ—PS/35D—12/2000—50.000. C.G. •-T VAl ]:t ?.B;; ^ i^ ^3^^1^M^:'^tePTg,,'{NTITE3T .:.^ki)S^...Shs^1 a^'S?^ C'pis^) (CIassi&cation Gontrol and A^ deserves to be deserves to altemative reinedy is availaTlle However, leanied respondents have gone fhrou; appUcable to the petitioner order bf suspension. Iiithe li| the;represeiTtation subinitted inay be treated as appeal audl a reasonable period. Wifh this dtrectioa, this * r Consequently, I.A. No. disposed of. Certified copy as per codasel wNch lidht ^P?^JN TmHf "^f ts^ ^F^TC ^ajfipTsn^r . ,; kpeal ) Rules, 1966 aad the petition be disinissed ou fhe grouiid that for the petitioner and the ^h mle 23 (3) of C.G. Service Rules provides for appeal agamst fhe of the above altemative provisioh 3y the petitioner vide Aruiexure P-16 the saoie inay be disposed ofwithiu petitiou. stands disposed of. 9937/2004 aad 9938/2004 stand rules Sd/- i Dhirendra Mishra Judge Gi. PRJ—FS/350-^12/2000—50.000.