1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2301 OF 2010 Rajendra Popatrao Pagar APPLICANT VERSUS Sanjay Yashwant Gunjal RESPONDENT Mr.Gandhi, learned Special Prosecutor for applicant. Mrs.V.A.Shinde, learned APP for State Mr.R.N.Dhorde, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and 3 WITH CRIMIANL APPLICATION NO.1785 OF 2010 Udaykumar Keruji Gunjal APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS Mr.D.S.Bharuka h/f. Mr.P.S.Bhandari, learned counsel for applicant. Mrs.V.A.Shinde, learned APP for State Mr.R.N.Dhorde, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and 3 CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J. DATE : 09/07/2010 PER COURT : 1. By the present applications, the respective parties have approached this Court to fix the early date of hearing in Cri.Revision 2 No.134/2006 and W.P.No.310/2006. The revision is preferred by the State while the writ petition is preferred by the original complainant. Record discloses that the criminal revision as well as the writ petition are arises out of the order of discharge passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner in Sessions Case No.8/2000, which arises out of CR No.73/1990. Considering the length and duration, when the CR was lodged and the case was numbered, it is necessary that these applications to be allowed for early hearing. Hence, applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause A, B and D. Cri.Rev.No.134/2006 and W.P.No.310/2006 are fixed for final hearing on 06/08/2010. Within meantime, Office to call for the record and proceeding in Sessions Case No.8/2000 from the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, Dist. Ahmednagar, if already not called. Applications stand disposed of accordingly. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/JULY 2010/cri.appl.2301-10