1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR W.P.No.913 of 2008 (Jairajsingh s/o. Shri Pralhadsingh Gahalod .vs. The Zilla Parishad, Nagpur and anr.) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha and Mrs. Vasanti A. Naik, JJ. DATE : 11.03.2008. Heard Mr. Nilesh Adbe, Adv. for the Petitioner and Mr.G.G.Mishra, Adv. for the Respondents. Counsel for the respondents states that since the petitioner failed to submit requisite documents along with his caste claim, therefore, his caste claim could not be referred to the Caste Scrutiny Committee. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that, on the earlier occasion, jurisdiction of this Court was invoked by the petitioner by filing Writ Petition, which was disposed of by this Court with a direction to the employer of the petitioner to forward the caste certificate of the petitioner along with the requisite documents to the Caste Scrutiny Committee; but, in spite of that, almost for a period of twelve months, the petitioner could not submit documents and therefore, the petitioner is reverted. However, the caste claim of the petitioner is referred to the Caste Scrutiny Committee at a later point 2 of time. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, the action taken by the respondents at this stage cannot be said to be unfounded. However, the counsel for the respondents states that if the caste claim of the petitioner is invalidated, appropriate steps according to law shall be taken. In the above circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE ssj