IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 80 OF 2006 SHRI JEROMIO FRANSCISCO RODRIGUES AND 3 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. D. P. Bhise, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S. Bandodkar, Additional Government Advocate for the respondents nos. 1 and 2. Coram:- S.B. DESHMUKH & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 14th December, 2010 P.C. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties. 2. It is stated that respondent no. 3 expired during the pendency of this Writ Petition. Advocate for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the petition with a liberty to the petitioner no. 1 to file appropriate representation to the respondents. 3. Petitioner is allowed to withdraw the petition with a liberty to the petitioner no.1 to make appropriate representation to the respondent. Such representation if made by the petitioner no.1, the same shall be considered by respondents in accordance with provision of law. 4. Writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of petitioner no.1 to file appropriate representation to the respondents. Consequently on such representation, the respondents shall decide the said representation in accordance with law. 5. Rule is discharged in no order as to costs. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. F. M. REIS, J. vn