1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4936 OF 2009 (Govindlal Balkrushna Shelke & Ors. vs. Gopalrao Zapraji Bobde) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JANUARY 28, 2010. Heard Shri Jetha, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Malode, learned counsel for the respondent is not present. Shri Jetha, learned counsel informs that on 21.01.2010, Shri Malode was not present and, therefore, the matter was required to be adjourned. The short grievance made by Shri Jetha is, the order dated 29.01.2009 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO) reversing the order of Tahsildar in favour of the petitioner is unreasoned one. The Tahsildar has allowed the application of present petitioner and directed removal of obstruction in his use of cart way. That order was assailed in the appeal and SDO has in the impugned order mentioned facts and arguments till para 7. Para 7 thereof reads “in view of the material above, I, W.S. Nikose, SDO, Morshi, pass the following order” and then operative order has been delivered. Thus, there are no reasons recorded. 2 The said order is, therefore, quashed and set aside. The matter is restored back to the file of SDO, Morshi, for taking fresh decision in accordance with law as early as possible and in any case by 31st March 2010. The petitioner shall appear before the SDO on 17.02.2010 and abide by his further directions in the matter. During the pendency of appeal before the SDO, the parties shall maintain status quo as on today. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.