IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIDNARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISIDICTION ORIDNARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISIDICTION ORIDNARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISIDICTION SUIT NO.1380 OF 1979 B.R.Mehta .. Plaintiff Vs. Joseph Mathi ... Defendant Mr.Vipul Shukla for the plaintiff Defendant present in person CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 9TH AUGUST, 2005 DATE : 9TH AUGUST, 2005 DATE : 9TH AUGUST, 2005 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . No records and proceedings are available in the record department. Both the plaintiff and the defendant and the learned counsel for the plaintiff have tendered consent minutes of order dt.9.8.05. The same are taken on record and marked ’X’ for identification. Suit is decreed in terms of the said consent minutes of decree on admission. Refund of court fee as per rules. Defendant who is appearing in person states that he does not wish to engage an advocate as he is settling the suit.