WP(C) 371/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA The matter relates to selection and appointment to the post of J unior Inspector/Auditor of Co-operative Societies. According to the petitioner, he did very well in the selection and was expecting his selection with eventual appointment. The respondents have filed their counter affidavit denying the c laim of the petitioner. In the additional affidavit filed on 5.9.2011, it has be en stated that the advertisement was published in the local dailies to fill up 4 5 numbers of posts of Junior Inspector/Auditor. Written test was held on 21.11.2 010 in the different districts of Assam. Out of 40924 applicants, 19127 number o f candidates appeared in the written test. Thereafter, the successful candidates were called for viva-voce test applying the ratio 1:4. The last candidate, who had been called for the viva-voce test had secured 56 marks. On the other hand, the petitioner had secured only 28 marks. Thus, the petitioner could not call fo r the viva-voce test. I have heard Mr. A. Maleque, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned State Counsel. In view of the above fact situation, no relief can be granted to the petitioner and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.