IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-16918 of 2011 Date of Decision: 30.05.2011 Karamjit Singh Bumrah ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Ranjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C read with Article 21 of the Constitution of India to protect life and liberty by issuing directions to respondent No.2 to conduct inquiry and take action against respondents No.5 to 7 and others who with the help of respondents No.3 and 4 had forcibly entered into the shop of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that respondents No.5 to 7 have violated the agreement (Annexure P-5) and have entered into the shop of the petitioner. It is, therefore, obvious that the dispute, if at all, is a breach of contract. No criminal offence is made out. Dismissed accordingly. However, in case, the petitioner still have any grievance or any criminal offence is made out, he is at liberty to file a criminal complaint or to avail of an alternative remedy in accordance with law. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 30.05.2011 JUDGE gurpreet