Civil Revision No. 3711 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3711 of 2011 Date of Decision: 29.7.2011 *** Tripta Kaur .. Petitioner Vs. Gurdeep Sachdeva .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present:- Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The petitioner-wife is being sued by the respondent-husband in a petition for dissolution of marriage. She filed an application for summoning of certain witnesses along with record, which has been dismissed by the learned Court below by dint of impugned order dated 16.4.2011, leading to the institution of the present revision petition. Heard. It is apparent from the perusal of the impugned order that the evidence and record sought to be summoned by the petitioner was found beyond her pleadings taken in the written statement, apart from having no mention whatsoever in her own evidence, about her treatment, the record of which was sought to be produced by her. She, admittedly, never supplied the names of the witnesses now sought to be summoned in the list of witnesses supplied by her. As evident from the impugned order, even she did not disclose the purpose of summoning of aforesaid witnesses. The petitioner wants to produce on record her sonography and record of examination, which ought to have been in her possession and it has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not having Civil Revision No. 3711 of 2011 2 any such record with her. In this view of the matter, the learned trial Court rightly dismissed her application. Dismissed. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE July 29, 2011 Jiten