IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4022 of 2010 Yunus Ali Shaukat Ali and others. - Vs. - Mohd. Harun Mohd. Yasin ................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... Mr. Anjan De, Adv. for petitioner. Mr.D.L.Dharmadhikari,Adv. for Respondent . CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 25th NOVEMBER, 2010. In a suit for specific performance of contract bearing Special Civil Suit no. 77/2002 filed on the basis of the two agreements dated 8.8.1996 and 6.3.1999, an application Exh. 92 was filed by the defendant no. 1 seeking permission to take photographs of documents i.e. agreement and supplementary agreement Exh. 49 and 50 filed by the plaintiff and to verify the signature of defendant no. 1 from handwriting expert. This application has been rejected by the trial court on 23rd June, 2010 by holding that when the signature of the defendant no. 1 is not in dispute, it is not necessary to seek opinion of expert as contemplated by section 45 of the Evidence Act. This is the order which is subject matter of challenge in this petition. The order impugned in this petition being of an interlocutory nature, I am not inclined to entertain the present petition. The same is hereby dismissed. It is, however, made clear that in the event if the decision goes against the applicant then it will be open for the applicant to challenge the findings recorded in the order impugned in appropriate proceedings. JUDGE Hirekhan