IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.116 of 2009 1. Amrendra Kumar Singh 2. Munna Singh 3. Avinash Kumar Singh 4. Dhiraj Kumar Singh 5. Santosh Kumar Rai 6. Sanjit Kumar ………………………….. Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 4. 08.11.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. This writ petition was filed on 5.1.2009 after serving two copies in the office of the Advocate General. No counter affidavit has been filed till date. A supplementary affidavit is filed today on behalf of petitioners 3 & 6. A submission is made from para 2 of the same that petitioners 1, 2 & 4 have been appointed during pendency of the writ petition and therefore are no more interested in pursuing the writ petition. It is next submitted with reference to Sri Santosh Kumar as petitioner no. 3 is a typographical error and it may be corrected to read as petitioner no. 5. Lave is sought to withdraw this application on behalf of petitioners 3 & 6 to pursue departmental remedies in view of certain orders of this Court in LPA No. 831 of 2009. The Court makes no observation with regard to the same. This writ application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with regard to petitioners 3 and 6. Accepting the submission made by them on oath with regard to rest of the petitioners when matters have been pursued on behalf of petitioners 3 and 6 by a Counsel other than those representing all of them originally, the application is disposed as infructuous with regard to the other petitioners at the risk and cost of petitioners 3 and 6. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)