Page No. - 1 « ”: 1 wm 3mm ' @ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.(S) No. awfy/zo I 0 K.K. SHUKLA S/o LATE SHRI PREMLAL SHUKIA, AGED ABOUT 80 YRS. RETIRED DEPUTY REGISTRAR, PT. RAVISHANKAR SHUKIA UNIVERSITY, RAIPUR (C.G.) RESIDENT OF 131, ANAND NAGAR, RAIPUR (C.G.) PETITIONER VERSUS i) STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, D.K. S.BHAWAN AIPUR (C.G.) COMMISSIONER, HIGHER EDUCATION EPARTMENT STATE OF CHHATTISGARH .K.S.BHAWAN, RAIPUR (C.G.) HE SECRETAR T Y INANCE AND PLANNING F DEPARTMENT OF ’ TATE OF CHHATTISGARH THE REGISTRAR, PT. RAVISHANKAR SHUK‘LA UNIVERSITY, RAIPUR (C.G.) Ch 6% @ / R D D S EW,WE,W / 31mm (Wu) Mwf‘am’ wmm mmm WEW wm $3W3TI€¥I SB: Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mahan Shrivastava, J. 1.7.2010 Shri L.C. Dash, counsel br the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents No. 1 to 3, on advance copy. Heard. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, a pensioner, who retired in the year 1990, ventilating hls grievance, on the ground that though the State of Chhattis rh has implemented recommendations of Brahma Swaroop C0mm1 tee vxde its Circular dated 7.7.2007 (Annexure P—2) and has alsorr vised D.A. of pensioners w.e.f. 1.9.2007 vide its Circular dated 31.8.2 07 (Annexure P—3), benefit of the same has not been extended to the 3etitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that the aforesaid benefits ur der the two Circulars are applicable to the petitioner, who retired as Dy. Registrar of Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur. It is further submitted '.hat petitioner had made representation to the Commissioner, Higher Education, Chhattisgarh, but, so far, the same has not been decided in spite of communication dated 1 1.12.2007 (Annexure P-5). As the representation of the petitioner is said to be pending before respondent No.2/ Commissioner, Higher Education and till date Wm ;..§i200 amm gm) WWW 3911mm Wmm (—v‘Z’ no decision has been taken on interest of justice to direct Education to take appropriat< petitioner and pass necessary ( wwwuiwm / *mm _ the same, it would be expedient in the respondent No.2/Commissioer, Higher = decision on the representation of the )rders thereon. petitioner submits that the petitioner der these circumstances, a time bound :spondent No.2 to take decision in the ' Learned counsel for the has retired long back and un direction may be issued to rt matter. Taking into considerati respondent No.2 / Commissioer the matter. within a period of E of this order. It is made clear that th is Court has not expressed any Opinion with regard to the merits of the case. With the aforesaid direc tion, the petition stands finally disposed off. A copy of this order be Registry. m7 l v i Praveen 3n the submission, it is directed rthat , Higher Education shall take decision in months from the date of receipt of copy sent to respondents No. 1 8&2 from the Sd/- i Manindra Mohan Shrivastiaiyggé Judge m min gamma, rewrite —-F§/I4‘7—’2/2mo —1.oo,ooo. \. \