vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.400 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.400 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.400 OF 2007 Kundan Hotchand Thadani ... Petitioner V/s. Dr.Sonali A. Bhanushali & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.L.H. Patil for Petitioner Mr.A.G. Pandit for Respondent No.1 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J MHATRE, J MHATRE, J. DATED: OCTOBER 13, 2008 OCTOBER 13, 2008 OCTOBER 13, 2008 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The petition challenges the concurrent orders passed by both the Cooperative Court and the Appellate Court. The dispute which was filed by the petitioner against Respondent No.1 alleged that Respondent No.1 was in occupation of the suit premises as either a licencee or a trespasser. The petitioner therefore, contended that Respondent No.1 should be evicted from the premises. 2. Both the Courts below have in my opinion rightly held that the Cooperative Court does not have jurisdiction over the matters relating to the cause of action mentioned in the dispute. The petitioner was claiming the premises as a legal heir of the original member of the society who had inducted Respondent No.1 : 2 : as a licencee. It is in these circumstances that both the Courts have dismissed the dispute application filed by the petitioner. 3. Petition rejected.