IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.11398 of 2009 Date of Decision: March 15, 2011 Kuldip Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. J.S. Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sukhvinder Singh Nara, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. S.S. Dinarpur, Advocate, for respondent No.4. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, quashing Order dated 12.11.2007 (Annexure P-3) passed by the District Collector, Yamuna Nagar; Order dated 31.3.2008 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala Cantt.; and Order dated CWP No.11398 of 2009 [2] 23.12.2008 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Financial Commissioner, Haryana. 2. The choice of appointing Lambardar between petitioner Kuldip Singh and respondent No.4, Satparkash was to be made by the District Collector, Yamunanagar. Respondent No.4 has been appointed as Lambardar in view of recommendations by the authorities and Resolution passed by the Gram Panchayat. The Commissioner and Financial Commissioner upheld the order passed by the Collector in appellate and revisional jurisdiction. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has more land and is more educated than respondent No.4. 4. I have considered the contentions of learned counsel. 5. The District Collector appointed respondent No.4 as Lambardar. No disability in the claim of respondent No.4 has been shown even by learned counsel for the petitioner. In such circumstances, the appointment of respondent No.4 as Lambardar is not required to be interfered with in judicial review, in extraordinary writ jurisdiction as no perversity in orders passed by the authorities has been shown. 6. The petition is dismissed. CWP No.11398 of 2009 [3] (AJAI LAMBA) March 15, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?