SSBS wx Sd/- 'T-r-s-W HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BtLASPUR W.P.(S) NQ. 246 of 2008 Pelitioner Vsrsus sspondsnts 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Jai Singh Ohurve, S/o Late Shri Bhoi Dhurve, aged about 58 and haif years, occupation service, posted as Town Inspector, Ka^hora, District Korba (CG). The Stste of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, (Wantraiay, D.K.5. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). The Direcfor General of Polics, ChhatUsgarh, Pollce Headquarters, Raipur(CG). The Superintendent of Potice, Korba (CG). City Superintendent of Poiice, Korba Sub Qvisionat Officer (Police) Ka^hora, DistrictKorba(CG). Shri Lalj! ShuMa, inspecter, Rakshit Kendra Korba (CG). WRIT PBTITIOK UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SS: Hon'blc Mr, Justicc Satteh K. A J Shri Sh.ailendra Shuklo, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri U. N. S. Deo, Govt. Advocate for tiie respondents No. 1 to 5. Shri Mateen Siddque, Advocate for fhe respondent No.6. ORAL ORDER ( Passed on this 17th riay ofMarch, 2008) 1. The petitioner, who is Town Inspector, Police Station, Katghora, District - KoAa, has impugued order dated 1.1.2008 (Aiuiexure P/1), whereby he was trausferred to Resei-ved Ceater, Korba. 2. Shri S^laitel^dra. Dubey, leanied couasel appearing for fhe petitioner subiuits fhat the postiag of fhe petitioner at fhe particular post is regulated as per fhe circular dated 9.2.2007 issue^by the Home Department, Govemment of Chliattisgarh, wherein it is dearly provided fhat the muiiiaum. period for the japim SmyjA m psjmba SB '..touaSpo a.ftrtB.i^siuimpB sq^ ssptAcud ^[leap (^/d amxamrv) gOOS'I'I V!3VBV -ispio pangndim sqj, -3 .•8t(RUMni pap.iooaj aq jieqs qoiqM .foTEa&xs 3.'fl?Ej}STmmpB uy y 'W '(8} '&) '(3) :(P) ;(o5 '(q) ;N -'aoiin •j.uanbasuoo sjeaA oaq jo anus^ Tanuiiumi aip jo Andxa srp ajojsq ^eod 8Tq iiioij. paMajsTre.4 jo psAomai aq .fem h) uoi^oas-qns TCI o^ P3LU3JM JSOTgO SOB t(j)UOT^33S-qn8 Ul gurcpAre SutpuB^sq^M^O},; (^) •SJBS-'C OSK^jo ajniiaj. Ttm.Tmuim B a.vev^ ~ffB^s 1.0UJ.S1Q 33tl0d V JO sSjBqOTtl '30T[Od JO -j.U3pU3^TtU3dng ^OU^SIQ B 8B JO 'UOTfKtg 33T^Od T3 JO 32jBT(o-Tti-j:33igo SB pa^sod uoigo aoTiOa (l) -saonp sagod uo sasaigo saaad BSS^SS jo ss^go jo aiinnsj, -^^ -:j3pim SB spBM ^,OOS '^3V 3^& y> 1?l aoii.oag -oiajaio. papuaddB Kj.aaitmoop pire s&mpBgid aq} paspjad 'ssi^iBd WQ. joj 8auB3ddB i[3sunoo psureai pjB3T[ 3Awq i •^ •SuitUATH pap.TOaai '&iiaSixs SA^e.TtsiuroipB Tiodn insnbasuoo paonps-i aq .fem uor^s aoiiod jo s&teqoui jaosg.o TJB JGJ paxg sjea.'C oas^ loj. aiTiHa^. TOmmuim 31^ pire 38TtB[o g^uetsqeuou B 51: 2.00S '^OV 3IR Jo l7l tioi^oag jo (i) (g) uop.oae-qns ^BTp ^iniqns ppiOA 's.Tjnoo jsd '9'oy ^uspnodea 3Tp joj SauesddB psunoo p3iLtB3[ 'anbppis ns-sfevi uqg pus 30^1: •o^[ s^uapuodsM sf^ 10} SnueaddB aiBooApy 'V-°Q paiuBsi 'OSQ •g •tj •fi UTIS •g '^V 3T&, ^oqs joj) 400S 'V^V ^Vfid qjBgsroBiiqo aiR jo ^ uoij.oag jo (ij (gj aoi^oas-qns jo aoreiAOjd sa^ japTm. QBJ ^ou saop jauoiiitad sip jo asBo sqj. 'snqj, •.iCoua&xs aAT^E-qsimmpB aip aiBoipai 1011 ssop japj.o isjsuar). 310. ^eq}. Sj.imqns jsxojn} SH •s.neaS. OM(. aq ppioM jo^osdsui UAOJ,JO Siipsod ^^"-:y':9^^Sll^ ^^MitJS^^I T^.^i;^.^:^;^ y sub-section (2) 0 ofSection 14 ofthe Act, 2007. The same reads as uader:- ' f^ ^ VS^J 3? Pt^gra^ * Pt^sra? u? w 4c{!"tf?i :3TT.?fcr RRT 4 •^itft^ WtgraS ^ aiTOc; ^ ^fl 9TFIT TRIH -iiir ^icRTcft WTOH ^ gfRT ^ES^ w wi ^ sig^te ? tBT^i-tiTiron/apraq TR teR P'PRPT ^ ^fe ^ Pi"lRlRiiri W.IHinW ^ifi^ gqrir -^ gH^l^.fiiHIT SIRiT t " 6. Shri Sliailendra Dubey, furttier relies oa a CBTCular dated 17.12.1996 (Annexure P/13) that the employees belonging to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Categories be posted on rcsponsible post aiid they should not be frequently traasferred. The contention of the petitioner is without aay basis. The present case is not related to posting a&d assigning responsibittty to S.C. and S.T. categoiy police officer but it is a case where looking to admiiustractive exigency fhe transfer snd posting order is passed. 7. !t is weU setfled principte of law that transfer is an incidence of service and it is for the employer to decsde as to where a particular of&cer/employee be posted keeping ui view public interest as weU as aditiiaistratiye exigen.cy. Th.is Court has Umited jurisdictioa to interfere ia tiie trausfer matfer and this Court can interfere only m. the cases of proved inala fide, non-competeace of authority passing the transfer order aad traasfer order not being in. conformity wifh fhe rdles aud regulations. None of the ahove grounds are avaiiabte to the petitioner. 8, In view of the foregoing, this petition is dismissed. No order as to costs, -— -— Thakur Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge