1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 498/2010 in SECOND APPEAL NO. 8/2000 (SMT. SHAKUNTALA W/O GANPATRAO RAMGIRKAR AND OTHERS VS. SHRI CHANDRABHAN RINDHE AND OTHERS ) ..................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... Mr R R Srivastava, Adv. for appellants/applicants Mr Rohit Sharma Adv.h/for Anand Parchure,Adv.for respondents CORAM : A.P. BHANGALE, J. DATED : June 22, 2010. 1. Learned counsel for appearing on behalf of respondents contended that the respondents are mostly senior citizens and could not take steps for restoration of the earlier Civil Application No. 8106/2004 which was dismissed for non- appearance. According to respondents, one senior Advocate Mr C.P.Sen was representing the present Respondents; but he could not appear and the application was dismissed for want of prosecution. Per contra, learned counsel for appellant dismissed this statement and contended that by order dated 31.7.2007, the prayer was rejected after it was restored pursuant to the order dated 23.7.2007. 2. Be that as it may; since some of the respondents are senior citizens, considering the nature of dispute, the Civil Application is allowed to the extent that the Second 2 Appeal shall appear for hearing from the category of ‘senior citizens’. Formal date of hearing is fixed on 23 rd July,2010 . JUDGE sahare