1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6431 of 2011 alongwith CWP Nos. 6529 & 6530 of 2011. Decided on: 17.8.2011 1. CWP No. 6431 of 2011. Devi Ram Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP No. 6529 of 2011. Devi Singh Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 3. CWP No. 6530 of 2011. Prem Dass Vs. State of H.P. & ors. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Surender Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. L.N. Sharma, Advocate in CWP No. 6431 of 2011. : Mr. Surender Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate in CWP Nos. 6529 & 6530 of 2011. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim the benefit of ad-hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of pension and 2 increments. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State of H.P. As prayed for, it is open for the petitioners to bring this fact to the notice of the respondents, who shall examine the same. Therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment, referred to above and take appropriate action, within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment, alongwith their representation(s) and a copy of the writ petition(s) as well as a copy of the judgment, referred to above, by the petitioner concerned. 2. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 17, 2011 (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.