bsb IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 6535 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 6535 OF 2007 PETITION NO. 6535 OF 2007 Bajirao S. Khajanwadkar & ors. ... Petitioners V/s Kasam Farid Saiyad & ors. ... Respondents Mr. Ambar Joshi for the petitioners. Mr. A.H.Gokhale with Madhukar Haromwar for respondent Nos. 2 to 6. Mr. S.K.Talsania for the respondent No.7. Mr. K.S.Bapat for Mr.a.H.Fatangare for the Resp.No.10. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 12TH SEPT., 2007. 12TH SEPT., 2007. 12TH SEPT., 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C.: 1. The petition challenges the order passed by the Industrial Court allowing the application of the Maharashtra Samarth Kamgar Sanghatana to be impleaded as a party respondent in Complaint (ULP) No. 19 of 2007. The Industrial Court has allowed the application and has directed that the Sanghatana be impleaded as respondent No.10. One of the prayers in the application was that after the Sanghatana is impleaded as a party, the complaint itself would be withdrawn by an agreement with 2 the Sanghatana. Although this specific prayer has not been granted, the application has been allowed. 2. The apprehension of the petitioners that the Sanghatana would withdraw the complaint, can be put at rest as the respondents cannot, in any case, be permitted to withdraw the complaint filed by the petitioners. 3. Petition rejected. .....