THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.1829 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.178 of 2010 in the Court of III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad against the respondents for a relief in the form of a direction to them to pay a sum of Rs.50,00,000/- as compensation, in respect of a contract that existed between them. The petitioner also filed I.A.No.1329 of 2010 for temporary injunction. The trial Court initially ordered urgent notice on 07.04.20210 and a fresh notice was directed on 15.04.2010. Complaining that the respondents are trying to remove the material in the meanwhile, the petitioner approached this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. While admitting the revision, this Court passed an order of interim injunction on 27.04.2010. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. There is no denial of the fact that there existed a contract between the petitioner and the respondents. The question as to whether the respondents are liable to pay any amount or that the petitioner holds lien on the material needs to be considered after the respondent files counter affidavit or if necessary, in the suit itself. If in the meanwhile, the respondents take up the material or causes obstruction for the construction, serous damage will occur to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents undertakes that his client would not take away the material nor would interfere with the construction until the trial Court disposes of the I.A. on merits. Therefore, the civil revision petition is disposed of directing that there shall be ad interim injunction in favour of the petitioner until further orders. The trial Court shall hear the I.A. in detail and pass appropriate orders after the respondent files counter affidavit. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 11.08.2010 JSU THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.1829 of 2010 Date: 11.08.2010 JSU