IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14686 of 2005 1. GOPAL SINGH 2. RAGHAV SINGH 3. MOSTT. LAGANI DEVI ALL HEIRS OF DECEASED SOLE PETITIONER RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHOPATPUR, P.S. JAMO BAZAR, DISTRICT SIWAN Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DIRECTOR HUMAN RESOURCES GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DIRECTOR PRIMARY EDUCATION GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT ACCOUNT OFFICER, SIWAN. 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SIWAN. 6. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, SIWAN. 7. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, SIWAN. ----------- 05. 19.07.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, State as also the Accountant General The claim of the petitioner is that upon the retirement of his father as Assistant Teacher on 31st of December 1984 and later on died on 23.04.1993, the GPF amount and some other retiral dues have remained to be settled which has not been paid despite representation filed by the mother of the petitioner who was the original writ petitioner in this case. Learned Assistant counsel to Standing counsel no. 10, appearing for the State submits that the 2 necessary detailed have not been stated in the writ petitioner as also in the representation in order to examine the claims of the petitioner. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file representations before the respondent nos. 5 and 6. In such view of the matter, in case such representations stating details of unpaid claims are filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondents shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)