IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH I AT BILASPUR $m§§m yam“ ‘ w.P. No £6 § /2005 : /MUKUND, S/o Rainu, Caste Bhatra, aged about 44 years, R/o Village Baniya GanV, Tah. & Distt. Bastar Jagdalpur (C.G.) VERSUS Petitioner WRIT /1 . Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bastar, Jagdalpur (C.G.) Ashok Singh, S/o Hardev Singh, aged about 43 years Caste - Khayatri, R/o Pahurbal, Tah. & Distt. Bastar, Jagdalpur (C.G.) Respondents @ PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 70F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. , XI—HCv—78 m zoo mam?- ash? mum Wmm EFTaUvj WW Wm éFWW Heard ShrS L5 ”msh; cm. Mir-2a, Pam" Lawyer “Fm“ respond The mam grievance 9f Th cm apgea} before ‘hhe respor 36—32-2002 passed by fhe Nani séme ias‘r Wm years! bu? respd fher‘efora, a d§rec7ion be gWew ' as eariy w pcsséwé. Hav§ng ward 3eamec§ cou ‘x‘a ”the fcwfs am} cércums'mm éirec‘x‘ed 1'0 decide fhe appeal! as Whh “fhe dérecTicH a‘x‘west‘ aariy as possibk. Consaquewiyi 3A. No.37? .Dcxr'ries are emh‘kd 35w ca msei far Tgne pafifiongr and $mT. Fouiia ém‘ No.5“ a pe%éfionzr is 'fha"; ‘ihe pefi‘rio‘nar fiied den? No} agc&§n§*§‘ "ma order dm‘ed b Tehgiwary ami fhe appaa] is pencE'mg mden‘r No.1 is m‘r decidimg The appeal, o rasqpwdari? Moi fa decidé The appeal} iqsei 1 Tor r ;,J18 pari‘ias am‘ havirig regard es cf Tha Gaga, resmndem No.1 i5 aid, ‘Tha periféom smnds $§$posad of. fl200§ (1230 sfamés digposed cf. r?i‘f$ad mp‘y o; .mg order. Sdl- L.C. Bhad°° £+§‘ // Judge mm (Wu)