THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY C.R.P. No.4760 of 2007 Date of Order: 26-11-2010 Between: Namburu Peda Narasimha Rao ..Petitioner and Chandu Venkateswaralu ..Respondent The Court made the following Order: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY C.R.P.No.4760 of 2007 Oral order: This revision under Article 227 of the Constitution by the defendant in the suit is directed to revise the order of the Junior Civil Judge, Nadigama in dismissing I.A.No.257 of 2007 in O.S.No.313 of 2002 filed to appoint the advocate commissioner to visit the plaint schedule land and take the measurements of the same with the help of Field Measurement Book and registered documents. According to the petitioner/defendant, disputed plaint schedule property is in R.S.No.462/18 whereas his land is R.S.No.462/17 and they are not village sites. The Advocate Commissioner appointed earlier measured the property of the plaintiff and the defendant with reference to the village Field Measurement Book and registered documents. The Commissioner submitted that he did not execute the work; therefore, a fresh commission is to be appointed to measure the plaint schedule property with the help of Field Measurement Book of Kanchikacherla village. Admittedly, the respondent/plaintiff earlier filed I.A.No.1 of 2007 to reopen the suit and he also filed I.A.No.2 of 2007 for appointment of advocate commissioner to measure the property of the plaintiff, which includes the plaint schedule property. I.A.No.1 of 2007 was dismissed on 13-02-2007 and consequently I.A.No.2 of 2007 was also dismissed for the reasons given in I.A.No.1/2007. On dismissal of the said I.As., the present I.A. has been filed by the defendant for the very same purpose. The learned Junior Civil Judge dismissed the I.A. stating that having the defendant kept quiet since 2002 filed the present petition when the matter has been coming up for arguments only to drag on the matter. In view of the same, no illegality is discernable to the order passed by the lower court warranting interference. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J. 26-11-2010 Murthy