IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35441 of 2010 MD.GUDDU @ TAKLA GUDDU @ MONU son of Late Md.Izhar, resident of Mohalla-Kasai Tola, P.S.- Sultanganj, Dist.-Patna Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 27.1.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Sultganganj P.S. Case No.14 of 2010 for the offences under sections 399, 402 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in jail custody since 7.2.2010 and there is no material to suggest that any stolen article was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. However, subsequently it was alleged that one Sonata watch was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It was also submitted that, at the time of arrest, from the possession of the petitioner one loaded pistol was recovered for which a separate case was instituted. Accordingly, it has been prayed to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State opposed the prayer for bail. It was submitted that the petitioner is accused in numbers of cases committing robbery and other serious offences. It is evident that besides the present case, he was accused in altogether four serious offences. Keeping in view the criminal antecedent of the 2 petitioner, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail stands rejected. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)