N..€...N.9. 3’35 W $H1$ msimmia’aa) WW&%€IW mafVmmaI $E ma. I. o7 09 2005 Mr‘ v‘nod Deshmukh, Ieamed c MrPankaj Shrivastava,‘ lear ed Panel Lawyer for _the State of Chhathsgarh Learned counse‘ for the petm ner submits that the petmoner orrgrnatly‘ belongs to Madhya Pradesh State R ad Transport Corporation Bhopal On ’drssolutron of M P State Road T nsport Corporation the Chhattisgarh InfrastructureDevelopment Corpora , by order dated 04.04.2003 (Annexure P4) directed the petitioner to join th Office of the Transport Commissioner, Raipur as constable, ’ till further o ere. Subsequently, by order dated 20.06.2003 (Annexure R3), it was st ted that salary ofthe petitioner would be drawn from the Regional Transport ce, Raipur.‘ The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction against respondents to take petitioner on duty on the post of constable and take rota ion duty from the petitioner. - There is no material to prove that the petitioner has been either removed or discontinued from the services. Order dated 20.06.2003 / Annexure P-3 clearly provides that th a salary of the petitioner would be drawn from the Regional Transport omce, Re ipur. I I The petitioner prays for a direction to the respondents: to decide his representations (Annexure P74 & P-5) expeditiously. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to consider and decide the tepresentations filed by the petitionei, if any are pending, or made within a period of one week, expeditiously, preterably within a period of three months. Consequently, LA. 7056 of 2005 ,for urgent hearing meow Sd/- _.Satish K. Agniiwtri ‘ Judge ounsel for the petitioner. in View of the foregoing, the peition stands disposed of. disposed. Sarma Eswrrsr2oos - 29.000 2?’ 3 tr n i t