L>^^^ .^•Sf^W]--- ^^^- S'Wf.F $Bffl ^ ?^v". ^-'•'^ ^•'•' ^f l^T^— IN THE HON?BLE HIGH COURT'OF CBHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR W. P. S. N0. 3^^ OF 2011 PETITIOHER . : Shiv Kumar Thakur S/o late Shri Dashrath Thakur, aged about-34 years, R/o Bairagpara, Pandariya, Distt. Kablrdham (C.G.). ^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS /l. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Forest Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). ^2. Divisional Forest Officer, Kawardha Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) ^3. Collector, Kabirdham Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) WRI_T ,_PETITEPN __ UNDER __ ARTICLE 226 OF CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner respectfuliy begs to submit as under:- i; / HIGH COUKT OF CHHATriSG^aiJ^T BILASF®R 8B : HOlTBl^iaaR. JUS'It^ByRITINKBR mWAKBR W.P.CSl.NO. 3827/2011 PBTITIONBR RBSPONDBMTs versus Shiv KumarThakiir Stete of Clihattisgarb & Others Shri Saatosh Bharat, couiiael for fhe petitipaer. Shri Praveen Das, Dy. G.A. for fhe State. 5m!T^PIMTTIONJ?SDBRARTICS^2260FiraSB^^ OFINmA ORDBR (18.07.2011) Counsel for the petitioner submits that ends ofjustice woirid be served if the petitioner is permitted to file representation in fhe li^it of the circular dated 5,3.08 passed by fhe State Goveroiixexit aad ia tum. the said representation be decided in accordaace with law. State counsel submits that fhe petitioner haa atready lost his case ia the Labour Court aiid as such he caixnot claiai for fhe same» Be fhat as it xaay, ia fhe eventuaHty of fflmg any representatioUy fhe saine xnay be decided by fhe co3iipetent aixfhority ia accordance wifh law, It is mLade clear tliat fhis Court has not exprcssed aay opinion oii merits offhe case aad fhe authorily concenied would be at liberly to decide the same ia accordance wifh law, Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge