1 1401.11-ao IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1401 OF 2011 Mr.Dhananjay Ramanna Shetty. ... Appellant . V/s. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and another. ... Respondents. P.M.Pradhan i/b. D.V.Sutar for the appellant. K.K.Soran for respondent No.1. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATED : 21st December 2011. P.C. : The Counsel appearing for appellant on instructions states that the appellant would tender proposal for regularization of construction along with all necessary documents to the Executive Engineer, Building Proposal, Kandivali within period of three weeks from today. In the event of tendering of such a proposal the same shall be considered by the Executive Engineer in accordance with provisions of law and rules and regulations within period of six weeks from the date of receipt of writ of this order. If such a proposal is tendered, no adverse action shall be taken until the same is decided and, in the event of any decision rendered by the Executive Engineer happens to be adverse to the interest of the appellants, no further adverse action shall 2 1401.11-ao be taken for a period of two weeks therefrom to enable the appellant to approach the appropriate authority. 2. It is needless to mention that appellant shall have liberty to approach appropriate authority, in the event of refusal of the proposal by the competent authority. 3. With these directions, Appeal from Order stand disposed of. The Counsel appearing for appellant on instructions states that suit pending before the City Civil Court shall be withdrawn. 4. In view of disposal of Appeal from Order, nothing survives for consideration in the civil application and the same is disposed of. (R.M.BORDE, J.)