1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.404 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2209 OF 2010 (Suresh s/o Balwantrao Patil vs. President/Secretary, Datta Prasadik Mandal and others) WITH LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.405 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2210 OF 2010 (Kiran s/o Ukandrao Patil vs. President/Secretary, Datta Prasadik Mandal and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A.Z. Jibhakate, Advocate for appellants. Smt. R.D. Raskar, Advocate for respondent no.1. Shri A.S. Fulzele, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.4. --------- CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND P.B.VARALE, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 13, 2010 Heard learned Counsel for the parties. These two appeals are directed against the common order dated 18/6/2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition Nos. 2209/2010 and 2210/2010 by which the writ petitions were allowed partly and the matter was remanded to the School Tribunal and while doing so, the learned Single Judge has made the following 2 observations : “Matters, therefore, need to be sent back to School Tribunal. The Management is free to file Resolution dated 10/5/2005 and the order issued to Shri Bhagat in 1999 with other relevant documents to show its compliance with the policy decision in the matter taken by the State Government in the then Government Resolution dated 10/5/2005. The objections of Shri Jibhkate in this respect are kept open and the School Tribunal shall consider the same in accordance with law. The impugned judgment is set aside only to that extent to facilitate consideration of documents being filed by petitioners. It is informed to this Court that during pendency of the appeal before the School Tribunal, the petitioners were restrained from making any appointment in response to the advertisement issued. That interim order will continue further till the School Tribunal decides the appeal finally. The proceedings in the said appeal are expedited and the School Tribunal, Amravati shall attempt to decide the appeal as early as possible and in any case by 31 st October 2010. Rule made absolute accordingly. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. ” We have also perused the reasons recorded by the learned Single Judge in the earlier part of the order dated 18/6/2010 and we do not find 3 any reason to interfere with the order impugned in the appeals. In the circumstances, these appeals are dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj