IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 7TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 16TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 21330 of 2008(L) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- P.P.SHIBU, S/O.K.V.NARAYANAN, EDATTUMMAL HOUSE, THRIKKARIPUR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE ASST.REGISTRAR (GENERAL) , CO.OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KANHANGAD, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 2. THE THRIKARIPUR FARMERS SERVICE CO.OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, THRIKARIPUR POST, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.VIJAYAMOHANAN R2 BY ADV. SRI.ALAN PAPALI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Rs/ THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.21330 of 2008-L = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 7th day of November, 2008. JUDGMENT 1.Service complete. 2.The petitioner states that he had been engaged as a salesman by the second respondent for quite a long time and that he is entitled to be regularized. He, therefore, seeks a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P2 representation filed by the petitioner seeking such an order. The second respondent has appeared and it is stated by the learned counsel appearing for that establishment, which is a co-operative society, that the petitioner was only a helper to the salesman and he had also competed in the selection to the post of salesman and failed and therefore was not appointed as salesman. It is also pointed out that there is no provision to WP(C)21330/08 -: 2 :- regularize such hands. Under such circumstances, I do not deem it necessary for this Court to direct the first respondent to consider any representation when there is really no power to direct the second respondent to regularize the service of the petitioner. Recording that the petitioner will continue to be engaged on provisional basis if and when required and without prejudice to the right of the writ petitioner to contest for any appointment in the service of the second respondent as and when notified, this writ petition is closed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/141108