IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 2ND NOVEMBER 2009 / 11TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 30315 of 2009(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- KULATHUPUZHA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.1867, KULATHUPUZHA, KOLLAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI. K.SIJU SRI.S.SUDHEESHKAR SRI.PRATHEESH.P RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CO-OPERATIVE ARBITRATION COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SMT. S.BEENA, D/O.SUHARA BEEVI PLAVILA VEEDU, KAITHACODE PO,KULATHUPUZHA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. SR.GOVT. PLEADER K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.30315 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a society. They adopted a resolution to fill up four vacancies in the category of Peon, Salesman and Night Watchman. They scheduled a written examination and interview on 3.1.2009. The 2nd respondent, who is a casual employee in the society filed ARC No.1/2009, in which, on 2.1.2009, the Arbitration Court passed Ext.P3 ex parte interim order. Therefore, the petitioner appeared before the Arbitration Court and sought vacating the interim order. The matter was heard. But no orders have been passed. The petitioner, therefore, seeks a direction to the Arbitration Court to dispose of I.A.No.1/2009 on merits. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. In so far as Ext.P3 is only an ex parte order, the Arbitration Court had a duty to pass final orders in the I.A. after hearing both sides. Accordingly, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to pass final orders in the I.A as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE 2 ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge