IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 3RD FEBRUARY 2009 / 14TH MAGHA 1930 CRP.No. 64 of 2009 ------------------------------- EP.391/2003 IN LAR.113/1991 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,THRISSUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER: ORUMANAYOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ORUMANAYOOR P.O., THRISSUR, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, ORUMANAYOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ORUMANAYOOR P.O., THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA RESPONDENTS: 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR. 2. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) GENERAL THRISSUR, CHAMBUKKAVU. 3. K.T. MUHAMMED UNNI, KARUPPALVEETTIL, THEKKETHIL HOUSE, ORUMANAYOOR AMSOM DESOM, P.O. ORUMANAYOOR. 4. RAISYA, W/O. K.T. MUHAMMED UNNI, KARUPPAM VETTIL, THEKKETHIL HOUSE, ORUMANAYOOR AMSOM, ORUMANAYOOR P.O., THRISSUR. THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.P. Balachandran, J. -------------------------- C.R.P.No.64 of 2009 -------------------------- ORDER The revision petitioner is Orumanayoor Grama Panchayat, who was not a party in L.A.R.No.113/91 or in E.P.No.391/03 on the file of the Sub Court, Thrissur and this revision petition has been filed by them with leave to get themselves impleaded in the said LAR on the execution side to assail the order passed by the court below on E.P.No.391/03, fixing the amount due to the claimant/decree holder, which, according to the petitioner, is much in excess of the amount due under the decree. 2. Leave was granted to the petitioner to file this revision petition. Petitioner is allowed to be got impleaded in the execution proceedings in E.P. No.319/03 in L.A.R.No.113/91 for the limited purpose of canvassing the correctness or otherwise of the amount claimed by the decree holder as per the award in the LAR, as the petitioner was the requisitioning authority and any amount payable CRP 64/09 2 under the EP will have to be satisfied by them. 3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the State had preferred a revision against the order sought to be impugned in this revision petition as C.R.P.No.669/08 and as per the order passed by this Court therein on 4.12.2008, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted back to the court below to fix the exact amount, if any, due to the decree holder. In the circumstances, petitioner may approach the execution court to get themselves impleaded in the execution proceedings as per the direction of this Court in this revision petition and may advance their contentions to the correctness of the claim. This revision petition is, thus, disposed of. 3rd February, 2009 (K.P.Balachandran, Judge) tkv