1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No.7528 of 2009 In W.P.No.438 of 2008. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ 1. Heard counsel. 2. The petition was dismissed in default as none appeared for the petitioners on 4.3.2009 when the petition was called out for hearing. Counsel would submit that the advocate concerned could not work out the matter due to inadvertence. He would submit that the delay is caused in filing of the application because Administrator was appointed to look after affairs of the Bank but lateron in January 2009 elections had taken place and thereafter the new Board of Directors came in the office. He submits that subsequently, the Legal Department noticed dismissal of the petition and thereafter appointed the counsel. Considering the explanation stated in paras 5 and 6 of the application, the delay deserves to be condoned. Hence, the delay is condoned and the petition is restored to its original position. 3. S.O. to 12.3.2010. (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) Dt.23.02.2010. asp/office/Ca7528.09