CLCON No. 6 of 2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. (Misc. Application No. 1984/2009) Sri Anoop Kumar Verma, Advocate holding brief of Sri C.D. Bahuguna, Advocate for the petitioners. Sri N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for respondent. Heard learned Standing Counsel on Misc. Application and perused the affidavit filed in support thereto. I find sufficient ground to condone the delay in filing the affidavit of compliance. Accordingly, Misc. Application is allowed. Affidavit of compliance be taken on record. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners for summoning the respondent and punishing him for committing willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court dated 11.02.2008, in writ petition no. 5945 (S/S) of 2001. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. The relevant portion of the impugned order passed by this Court reads as follows: “All the prayers fall within the domain of the executive action by the State. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to make fresh representation before the State Government, who shall decide the representation of the petitioners with the reasoned order within two months from the date of production of certified cop of this order.” Respondent has filed affidavit of compliance and in paragraph-6 of the same, it has been stated that impugned order passed by this Court has been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioners has not objected to the averments made in the affidavit of compliance. Under the aforesaid circumstances, I do not find any justification to continue the contempt petition against respondent furthermore. Accordingly, contempt petition is dismissed. Notice issued against the respondent is hereby discharged. Dated: 20-3-2009 (B.C.K., J.) SP