^w' c.^ s>°^ ^' IN THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRIT PETITION (0 N0. OF 2007 PETITIONERS APPLICANTS ^/ ^^^ ^•-•^w ....•<.<^v" 1^--"" b^--"" ^° </ .^~A7^ *oy . ^\ * ^ -s<~' ^' ^y^" ^ ^- 'Q'' ^^^v'' ^ .<^ Mahesh Kumar Agrawal Son of Late Harchand Rai, aged about 54 years, Resident of Indu Chowk, Bilaspur, Jarhabhata, Bilaspur (C.G.). Ishwar Lal Son of Late Harchand Rai, aged about 56 years, .^Sc^s^c^x\\ Kharsiya, DistrictfKharsiygXC.G.). -°p:L^^,-) Smt. Shakuntala Wife of Shri Sitaram, aged about 57 years, Resident of Bilha, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.). Smt. Radhabai Wife of Shri Narsingh Lal, aged about 55 years, Resident of Sambalpur, Tahsil and District Sambalpur (Orissa). Smt. Kusumbai Wife of Shri Naresh Kumar, aged about 49 years, Resident of Raigarh, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.). Smt. Premlata Wife of Shri Santosh Kumar, aged about 46 years, Resident of Sambalpur, Tahsil and District Sambalpur, (Orissa). ^ .' 31 :Ki N :/,t ^j '•.'13 238^^? ^^^f l8S. T ^ 8, RESPONDENTS PLAINTIFF 1. ol^ DEFENDANTS e^ u^- Smt.^Lata Wife of Shri Govind Ram, aged about 43 years, Resident of Kharsiya, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.). Shri Purushottam Lal Son of Late Harchand Rai, aged about 51 years, Resident of Kharsiya, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.). The petitioner No.2 to .-8^? appearing through their power of attorney holder Mahesh Kumar i.e. petitioner No.l. VERSUS Mukesh Kumar, aged about 48 years Son of Ramdayal Chouksey, Resident of Tikrapara, Near Jalamandir Mandir, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.). fLll^- 2. Vijay Kumar Gandhi, aged about 46 years; 3. Rajkumar Gandhi, aged about 48 Cjp years; 4. Ashok Kumar Gandhi, aged about 52 years; The defendant No.2 to 5 of father Shri Darshanlal Gandhi, Resident of Dayalband, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.). 5. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Kvr ~3 r "4i4|id'4i, yiil'M'li<°, isi<'i]'Hli< W.PCc-) /*J^ ^ <fP<<1! t»»NI<n ••^2007 sn^i TRT (iqtaiyT) sn^ivi Ww .1 wiTan^igiiiw Shri Ankit Singhal, counsel f4 Shri Sanjoy K. Agrawal. Advo) Shri Singhal, learned counse submits that with the passage of infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is infructuous. No order asto costs. Consequently, pendmg applical r the petitioners. Mte for the respondent No.l. appearing for the petitioners I'ime this petition has become dismissed as hwinq become ions, stand disposed of. Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge ^ <*i<ifi'i<i)-< ^w^S ti fe^t <fatsi< 1; 3ifii»TSII^I l^nw^CT sii^i S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. A. 21. 07.2009 •^#i gawsRi (ra-!i<?>ra—ls/95—11/zooa—i ,00,000.