IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWPIL No. 11/2006 with CWP No. 446 of 2006 and CWPIL No. 5 of 2006. Date of decision:18.3.2010 1. CWPIL No. 11/2006 Court on its own motion ….Petitioner Versus State of HP & ors. ….Respondents. For the Petitioner: Mr. B.C. Negi, Amicus Curiae. For the Respondents 1,2 & 5: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. For the Respondents 3,8,15 & 17. Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate For the Respondents 6 & 7 Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate. For the Respondent No.10 Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent No.11 Mr. N.K. Sood, Advocate. For the Respondent No.20 Mr. Atul Jhingan, Advocate. 2. CWP No. 446/2006 Parents Association, Sy. Mary’s High School ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP & others ..Respondents. For the Petitioner: Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent No.1 Mr. R.K.Bawa, AG with J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. For the Respondents 3 & 4 Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate. 3. CWPIL No. 5/2006 Court on its own motion ...Petitioner Versus State of HP & ors ...Respondents. For the Petitioner For the respondents Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B,Misra, Judge. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral) These writ petitions pertain to various issues concerning the conduct of affairs in the private and un-aided schools in the State. Some are affiliated to CBSE Board, some are affiliated to ICSE and some are affiliated with H.P. Board of School Education. In view of the intervening developments, this court at this juncture, need not go into various aspects pertaining to the administration of the schools. Apparently, such aspects are covered by the statutes framed by the respective bodies. In case, any of the students, teachers, parents have any grievance with regard to the violation of any of the provisions governing conduct of the schools, it is certainly open to them to approach the authorities concerned, who will get an opportunity to look into the same and take appropriate corrective measures. We also make it clear that the authorities concerned should apply their mind in the light of the decision of the Apex Court in Modern School Vs. Union of India & ors (2004) 5 SCC 583 and frame proper guidelines, if not already framed, with regard to the maintenance of accounts. The needful shall be done within a period of three months from the date of production of the copy of this judgment. Writ petitions are disposed of as above. . (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 18, 2010(s/sl) ( Justice R.B. Misra ), Judge