IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 1704 of 2007 (O&M) Date of decision : November 10, 2009 Smt. Savita Appellant Versus Dharmender Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Present : Mr. Jitender Nara, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Surinder Saini, Advocate for the respondent NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is an appeal against order dated 27.9.2006 passed by Addl. District Judge, Panipat. While dismissing the petition visitation rights were granted to the appellant – wife. She was entitled to visit and give gifts to the child on his birthday and on Sundays/holidays and also during summer and winter vacations during day time or such period and at the house of the respondent or some other place or house of some common relative as may be mutually agreed upon between both the parties. Learned counsel for the appellant while challenging the impugned order states that the appellant will be satisfied if the child is allowed to stay with the appellant – mother for 10 days during the summer vacations and 4 days during the winter vacations in a given year besides the visitation rights already granted by Addl. District Judge, Panipat vide order dated 27.9.2006. Learned counsel for the respondent on instructions from respondent – father states that he has no objection to the grant of prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant. FAO No. 1704 of 2007 2 In pursuance to the order dated 21.10.2009 passed by this Court, the parties alongwith minor child are present in the Court and after talking with parties and child, it is noticed that the respondent has no objection if the child meets her mother periodically or to stay with her during the summer and winter vacations. Even otherwise for the welfare of the child and his interest, the prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant is fair. Accordingly, the present appeal is disposed off on the statements made by learned counsel for the parties with a direction that the appellant will be allowed to take the minor child for first 10 days during the summer vacations and for first 4 days during the winter vacations. Besides the same, the appellant shall continue to have the visitation rights in the same terms as ordered by the Addl. District Judge, Panipat vide order dated 27.9.2006. Disposed off in the above terms. A copy of the order be given dasti under the signatures of Reader of this Court. (Nirmaljit Kaur) 10.11.2009 Judge reena