BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eleventh day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14604 of 2011 C.PONNUSAMY ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs 1 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, C.C.I.W.C.I.D, DINDIGUL DISTRICT STATE REP.BY, 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C.C.I.W.C.I.D, DINDIGUL UNIT, DINDIGUL CR NO.NO KNOWN ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDI, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.not known, on the file of the respondent police, for offences under Sections 406, 408, 420, 477-A, 467, 471 and 120(b) IPC. He has come forward with this petition seeking Anticipatory Bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, the petitioner is the second accused in the case. He is the Secretary of Kampliampatti Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society. The first accused is the Assistant Secretary and the third accused is a clerk in the society. It is alleged that in the enquiry conducted under Section 81 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, he turned out that more than 4,57,365/- was misappropriated. Based on the said report, now a case has been registered against all the three accused. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that owning the responsibility, accused Nos.1 and 3 have repaid the entire amount. However, insofar as the petitioner is concerned, he is not at all connected with the alleged embezzlement. 4. I have considered the above submissions. A perusal of the First Information Report would go to show that these transactions are borne out by records and all the records have been seized by the authorities concerned and the amount has also been recovered. In such view of the matter, I am of the considered view that granting of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner would not hamper the further investigation. In the result, the Criminal Original Petition is ordered and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.3, Madurai, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 AM without fail for a period of four weeks. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. Sd/- 11/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III MADURAI 2 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CCIWCID, DINDIGUL DT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C.C.I.W.C.I.D, DINDIGUL UNIT, DINDIGUL 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. VEERA KATHIRAVAN Advocate SR.No.39154 ssk/12.11.2011 /6c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14604 of 2011 Date :11/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/