IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH F.A.O. No. 1857 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.1.2011. Parveen Kumar ....Appellant Versus Mrs. Alka ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. K.S. Dhanora, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate for the respondent. RAJESH BINDAL J Challenge in the present appeal is to the order passed by the learned District Judge, Family Court, Hisar, declining the prayer made by the appellant for custody of the minor child born out of the wedlock. It has been noticed by the learned Court below, in the impugned order that after the marriage of the parties was solemnised on February 3, 2005, a son was born on October 31, 2005. The marriage was dissolved by way of mutual consent on July 25, 2007. It has been specifically understood between the parties by way of compromise deed that the custody of the child will remain with the mother. At the time of motion hearing, learned counsel for the appellant restricted the prayer in the appeal only to the extent of visiting rights. Once the appellant at the time of grant of divorce by way of mutual consent had agreed that the custody of the child will remain with the mother and he did not claim for any visiting rights, no further litigation on that account can be entertained. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 10.1.2011. JUDGE Reema