CRP 29/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.KATAKEY Heard Mr SP Roy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr PK Kalita, l earned counsel for the respondents. The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in Title Suit No.498/2007, by th e present petition have challenged the order dated 22nd October 2009 passed by l earned Civil Judge No.3, Kamrup in Misc Appeal No.11/2008 filed by the present r espondents/who are the defendants in the suit. By the impugned order dated 22nd October 2009 passed in the aforesaid ap peal, the order dated 10th April 2008 passed by learned Munsiff No.1, Kamrup in Misc(J) Case No.559/2007 arising out of aforesaid suit, granting an order of inj unction restraining the respondents herein from raising further construction ove r the suit land till the right, title & interest of the respective sides are asc ertained in the trial, has been stayed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the said suit has been filed for declaration of right, title and interest in respect of the suit land, which is under illegal occupation by the present respondents/defendants, and tak ing advantage of their possession they are raising construction over the suit la nd and, therefore, learned trial Court had rightly passed an order of injunction , which ought not to have been interfered by learned appellate Court in the appe al. Learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, submits that no construction was raised after filing of the suit and the construction of buildin g has been completed even before filing of the suit and the respondents are not taking any steps for raising any other construction over the suit land. It is fu rther submitted that the suit is now fixed for examination of defendants’ witnes s, and is nearing its completion. Since the respondents have stated that they are not interested in raisin g any construction over the suit land and the petitioners are praying for an ord er of injunction restraining the respondents from raising any construction, with out going into the legality of the order impugned, the parties are directed to m aintain status quo as on today till disposal of the suit. Learned Munsiff shall make an endeavour to decide the suit, as expeditiously as possible. The revision petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.