IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19962 of 2011 1. Srikant Mishra Son Of Late Late Rajdeo Mishra Resident Of Village-Mahnakulli, P.S.-Chan[Atiya, District-West Champaran. 2. Manoj Mishra @ Manoj Kumar Mishra Son Of Late Rajdeo Mishra Resident Of Village-Mahnakulli, P.S.-Chan[Atiya, District-West Champaran. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate, West Champaran At Bettiah. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran. 4. The Deputy Collector Land Reform, Bettiah, West Champaran. 5. The Circle Officer, Chanpatiya, West Champaran At Bettiah. 6. The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Bettiah, West Champaran. 7. Ashesar Pandey Son Of Late Dhani Pandey 8. Daroga Pandey Son Of Late Dhani Pandey 9. Dilip Pandey Son Of Daroga Pandey 10. Akhilesh Pandey Son Of Daroga Pandey 11. Shakti Pandey Son Of Late Bijli Pandey 12. Jai Prakash Pandey Son Of Late Bijli Pandey 13. Nanhe Pandey Son Of Late Bijili Pandey 14. Santosh Pandey Son Of Late Bijili Pandey 15. Rupesh Kumar Pandey S/O Shakti Pandey, all residents of Village-Mahnakulli, P.S.-Chanpatiya, District-West Champaran. ---------------------------------- 2 16.12.2011. In the instant application, the petitioners pray for taking the Encroachment case no. 3 of 2009-10 to its logical conclusion. The petitioners submit that report of Anchal amin would show that respondent nos. 7 to 15 have made encroachment over the land bearing Khata no. 293, Khesra no. 603 measuring about 10 dhurs in Mauza Mahanakulli under Thana no. 63 situated on the eastern side of Bettiah-Chanpatia main road. The petitioners submit that the Circle officer, Chanpatia ought to have disposed of encroachment case in terms 2 of reports of Anchal amin contained in annexure 5/1. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State, I direct the Circle officer, Chanpatia to dispose of the aforesaid land encroachment case within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after hearing private respondent nos. 7 to 15 as well as the petitioner. This court has confined its order to the issue relating to encroachment only, and in respect of other grievances, it would be open for the petitioners to make prayer before the appropriate authority. The writ petition stands disposed of. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)