CRP 450/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Khalek, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has sought to invoke the jurisdiction under Article 227 o f the Constitution of India in challenging the order dated 11.10.2010 passed by the learned Executing Court in Title Execution Case No.20/2003, whereby and wher eunder the application filed by the petitioner under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been rejected. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that sinc e the decree drawn by the Registry of this Court pursuant to the judgment and or der dated 23.07.2002 passed in Second Appeal No.187/1996 does not mention about the recovery of khas possession, the learned Court below has committed illegalit y in proceeding with the execution proceeding wherein the decree holder has pray ed for recovery of khas possession. It appears from the judgment and order dated 23.07.2002 passed by this C ourt in Second Appeal No.187/1996 that the suit of the respondent was for recove ry of khas possession apart from declaration of right, title, interest and for p ermanent injunction. The suit of the plaintiff though initially was dismissed by the learned Court below, this Court in the aforesaid Second Appeal decreed the suit of the plaintiff. Accordingly the decree was drawn stating that the suit of the plaintiff is decreed with cost in terms of the judgment passed. The suit of the plaintiff/respondent being for recovery of khas possessi on also, the learned Court below has not committed any illegality in rejecting t he application under Section 152 CPC filed by the judgment-debtor/petitioner. Th e decree passed by this Court has to be executed. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the present revision pe tition to invoke the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and hence the same is dismissed.