IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.17185 of 2007 Date of Decision : January 27, 2011. Rajesh Kumar .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Gurcharan Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Manoj Bajaj, Addl.AG, Punjab for respondent Nos.1 & 2 Me.Balwinder Singh, Advocate, for respondent Nos.3 to 5. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 31.1.2002 (Annexure P-1/A) passed by respondent No.4, order dated 10.6.2004 (Annexure P-3) passed by respondent No.3 and the order dated 22.8.2006 (Annexures P-5) passed by respondent No.2, whereby the MIG Flat No.2687-C, Sector-70, S.A.S.Nagar Mohali, was ordered to be resumed and his appeal and revision against the resumption order were also dismissed. The main controversy pertains to the non-payment of the installments by the petitioner who had also disputed the statement of accounts prepared by the respondents. The record reveals that pursuant to C.W.P.No .17185 of 2007 2 the interim orders passed by this Court from time to time, the petitioner has made certain payments and as per the last statement of accounts placed on record by the respondents, he is liable to pay Rs.8,04,213/- as on 30.11.2009. Thereafter, the petitioner was further directed to pay Rs.2,60,000/- vide order dated 18.11.2010 which he has admittedly deposited with the respondents. Two more installments have already been deposited by the petitioner. The petitioner was allowed to reconcile the statement of account with the assistance of his Chartered Accountant and after undertaking this exercise, he is satisfied by the demand raised by the respondents. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the balance amount though in installments. He is willing to pay the due amount of Rs.6,97,792/- within a period of three months. Ordered accordingly. It is directed that the petitioner shall be at liberty to deposit the balance seven installments on or before the due dates. Subject to his depositing the above-said balance amount, the resumption order as well as the consequential appellate and revisional orders are quashed. Dasti. January 27, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE