Page ^Qi ^ C-f^'fs'o l^- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. TSO. ^t ^O /2006 PETITIONER ^. ./• ^x ^y./ -^M^ t'<-*/L\..-" ...•••"..•^ -•''^'-^'^ w ^' ^: Ram Kumar Ram, S/o Shri Ghurbigan Rarti; aged about 47 years,0ccupatio"ii : Service ( y22££jyxisian-EeacIiet:)-' Incharge Principal, Higher Secondaiy School, Ramchandrapur, Tribal Development Block & Tahsil - Pal, District - Surguja, (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS XP^ ^fs^ : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, .., Scheduled Tribe and Scheduled Caste Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). \c<-?^lf^^ ^&^^ff '^&SSS^" /I. The Collector Surguja Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) /3. Assistant Commissioner,Tribal Development, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) / 4. The Block Education Officer, . Tribal Development Block & Tahsil - Pal, District- Surguja, (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE \WRIT, DIRECTION. ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER Bn <tii->iFci41-f wicff ff fscft rfSrezrc ^srf^q-an^T Mr. Bhupendra Singh, couns^l for the petitioner. Mr. &.K. Beriwal, Depirty A^vocate Senerot for the State/respondents, on advance copy. Hea'd both the coursel. By this writ petition under ^ rticle 226/227ef the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who i3 Upper &ivi3(on Teocher working os In-chu*ge Principal, Higher- Secondary School, Ramcht^ndraput-, has challenged his trcnsfer order dated 7-7-2006 (Annexure P-1) pjssed by respondent No.2; whereby he has been transferred from Higher S^condtry School, Rfflnchandraptff* to Block; 3^'.<)i<iiit<<, ®Tf)ti'ts,Rditiy< aii^i<<att) (y<I^si^<r) 3n^?r%rR-<i«b (ffn'srR^Tstiii'h g^grw dfer a'n^r 30-8-2006 WadrafTKga". &rievance of the petitione] petitioner was tronsferred to (Sam sutanits that the petitioner moy which learned counsel appearing foi^ Having heard learned counsi to make a detailed representation r 'is that he is wor'king as Upper &ivision Teacher, whereas, he has been s^own cs Assistant Teacher. Moreover, the Aondrapur only in the month of September, 2005 from Bhaiycrthcn and now, ijithin a period of ten months, he has egdn been transferred. Therefore, on ttiese two ^ounts, learned counsel for the petitioner" be oltowed to moke o representation to respondent No.2 and respondent I^Jo.2 to be directed to decjde the same to the Starte/respondents has no objection. ^l for the pa'ties ond havirg regard to the facts and circumstances of the ca^e, the pr-ayer made by learned cou»Kelfor the petitioner is just, fair and rea4»n<d>le. Therefore, •the petittoner is allowed 'aisin9 oft his grievances, annexin9 a copy of this writ petition and its onnexiy^s to respondent No.2 within 10 days from P.T.O. XI-HC-78 »TI<<yrT<itl*1|ct» TSf^W^Pf, a-rfl^'is, fsiciiyy ..'^.p:'^^0/ ?R; 3Ti^?TIra%'(^srfg^sr) sn^r^rR.iicb (raT3n^Tsh1 gTarai Hfsff sn^r ^prfrpft^ wraY ff te^t rfSrt^ ^3Tf^IT3T1^T Soma <^ today ond !n tum, respondent N0.1 the petitioner within a period of considering the objections raised accordance with law. In the petitioner- is decided, the petiti))ner r-elieved. With the directions Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.; is directed to decide the representation of PO days from the date of its receipt, after by the petitioner in on objective manner, in tfiean time, till the representation of the diall not be retieved, if alr-eady not afores4id s^id, the petition stands disposed of. 3&18/2006 and I./t.No.8178/2(X36 also stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for cerf'ified copy of this order. Sd/- ^C.Bbadoo jud&e ^[^f '^'v^ P.T.O.