c^cs) i20yo<5 1H 'rHE .MADHTA. pK&D,i3E,gI,.?3 4DEIMlSTE»rI';£;_iaIo '?Hl3CIPlI,-BgHO'lTiT-j£BlZ;?UHTS7F7T'.- wa:r, 2&o^ O.A.NO. DSTI Pa&SaD ri.IU.T,&S2B ABOOT 51 XSAKS,&^) SIiHI.aAli'Ba.IE KaM •rA.D,il7,00 -iU'sPTjap ^OPEMIOH u,l?SK KiiSOUECSS SUB DITCSION Pi.LI, DISTT; BIIi.i3PUE (I'l,?.) . OS- 1995 .i.Pj-LIO.i.-?? -Versus- 1)STAIB O? MiBHZS. rnADESH; TEHOV&Hi SEOK;3?;,.R?, aTSri KiSOUHCES B^PAMHENT, KS.LLS.3H BHAa3,BHOpAL(K.P.) 8)OHIE,F BHQINESR, 'iaTES RESOUSaSS-DSPiHTMiaNI H&SDSTC ^.ft&ffKK,,3ItiSyVB., DISTT; BI.LASCTE(M.P.5 . 8}SUB DIVISIOML OPFIGSU, HAT3H RBSOCTECES SUB SI7ISIOS P&I,I, DISTT: ^BILASPURtM.P.). ,RESrOi.lD@TS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.1205/2005 PETITIONER Devi Prasad Yadav RESPONDENTS Versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aanihotri. J. Present: - None for the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 12th day of November, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. (2) In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner forthwith.