3%‘2GLF §3a ”mnw ‘1‘“ < Q(95G ..... lN THE 9P??GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NOé1% OF 2011 PETITIONER /Mukesh Shormo, S/o Shri G.P.Sharm0, aged about 44 years, presently working as Nefra Sahayak, Eye Department District Hospital Durg and r/o Qtr‘No. HG-4, Panch Building, Durg District Durg (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS > l§tate of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Health& Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. /Director Health Services, Directorate of Health Service Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Collector District Durg (Chhattisgarh) 4. Chief Medical & Health Officer District Hospital, Durg, District Durg (Chhaftisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI: MANDAMUSL PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS: xxe ‘ ‘ « 2; HIGH COURT OF CHHA'TTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 6278 0f2011 Mukesh Shanna, VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhamsgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CON S'HTU'I'ION OF INDIA SB: Hon’He Shri Satish K. Agnihntri, J. Present: Shri Rahim Obwam': Advocate for the petitioner Shri Arum Saw, Govermneut Advocate for the State/respondents ORDER (ORAI J (Passed on 20m day ofOctober, 20 1 1) 1. Learned counsel aypearing for the petitioner: on instructions. seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition on the gound thai, the petitioner wants to make a. representation to the respondent authorities in the light of several orders nassed in the identical matters. by this Court. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no obj ection. 3. It is ordered accordingly. 4, Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated observation. Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNIHORI Judge