1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9163/2007 Murari Lal Versus The Assistant Engineer, Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Others Date of Order :: 11th August, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. Bharat Saini for the petitioner BY THE COURT: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The plaintiff-petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction alongwith an application for temporary injunction which was dismissed by the trial court vide order dated 12th May, 2006. Being aggrieved with the same, the petitioner filed an appeal but without success. Now he has filed this writ petition being aggrieved with the aforesaid two orders. 3. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and the reasons assigned by both the courts below for rejecting the application for temporary injunction and after considering the same, I 2 find that both the courts below have recorded a concurrent finding in respect of prima-facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury in favour of the defendants and against the plaintiff / petitioner. The said finding cannot be interfered with by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK