(1) agk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8317 OF 2010 Mrs.Krishna Satish Singh .. Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & Anr .. Respondents Mrs.Krishna Singh, petitioner in person. Ms.S.S.Bhende, A.G.P for respondent No.1. CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATE : 7th December 2010. P.C.: . The grievance of the petitioner appearing in person is regarding non-disposal of the matter by the Consumer Redressal Dispute Commission, Mumbai, Maharashtra. The petitioner has filed an appeal bearing No.163 of 2008 before the Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Mumbai. The Commission has adjourned the matter to 13th December 2010 awaiting the decision of the Supreme Court on the issue as to whether advocates are covered (2) under the Act. It is submitted by the party appearing in person that since Apex Court has not granted further stay of proceedings, the Commission shall proceed with the matter. 2 In our view, it is not necessary for the Commission to indefinitely adjourn the matter as appeal can be disposed of on its own merits. The aggrieved party can thereafter may take the matter before the higher forum. In case the proceedings before the Commission has not been stayed by the Supreme Court, the Commission shall proceed with the pending appeal and dispose of the same expeditiously. Subject to what is stated above, petition is disposed of accordingly. (Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, J) (P.B.Majmudar, J)