ii •"%.. ^-I y / /\^ •ff "^w!<A ^.^s^ Petitloner Wrlt of 2011 Ritesh Sharma A.ged 23 Years S/'o Lafe Madaniai Casfs Bramhsn R/o vlilage Shelrona.rays.n; Tahsti Nawagarh; District-Janjgir-Chsmpa Versus 1. Hariprasad Aged 61 Years S/'o Bangaii @ Shlvdatt 2. Urna Bal Aged 55 Years W/o Late KamaE kant .' 3. Chandrashekhar Aged 25 Ysars S/o Late Kamal kant 4. Rsjnish Sharma Aged 58 Years W/o iate MadsnSal 5. Ravlkant Aged 30 Years S/o late MadanSal 6. RaResh Kumar Aged 28 Years S/o Sate Madaniai 7. Rekha Aged 32 Years S/o late iVladaniai ASE Caste Bramhan RJ'G yillage Shejronarayan; Tahsjt Nawagarh, Dtstrict Janjglr Champa (C.G.) (Writ Petition under Articie 227 ofthe Constjtution of jndia), Ivlr.SumJt Singh, counsei for tne petjtiongr. (S8: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Stiarma, J.) (29-7-2011) 1. 3y this petitiOR under Artlcle 227 ofthe Constltutlon of indla the petitloner has chalienged the isaaiity and propristy of the order 25.1.2011 (Annexure P/1) by the Clvjl Judge Class-il, Nawagarh In Civil Suit N0.15A/08, whereby Civll Judge Ciass-ii has aliowed the appJlca.tlon t1ied on behalf of respondent No.3 under Order 9 Ru!e 7 of the Code of Civl! Frocedure. 2. I have heard Searnsd counsei for. the petitioner, perused the order impugned and othsr 'documents fiied on behatf of the petitioner. r~n -2.- ^ 3. I do not find any ilisgallty in the order impugned vvarrantlng interference in exerclse of supervlsory jurisdlctlon. Consequently, the writ petition is dlsmissed summerily. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^1 / r