IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA THURSDAY, THE 19TH JUNE 2008 / 29TH JYAISHTA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 3755 of 2008(R) ----------------------------------------- (CRIME NO.8/2008 IN CHELANNUR EXCISE RANGE) .................... ACCUSED/ACCUSED: ------------------------------ RAGHAVAN, S/O.THEYYATHIRA, RESIDING AT POOLAKKAL MEETHAI, PAVANDOOR, NADUVALLOOR AMSOM, EENTHAD DESOM, KAKKUR VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN SRI.V.R.JAIKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT AND STATE: ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 2. EXCISE INSPECTOR, CHELANNUR EXCISE RANGE, CHELANNUR. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.HEMA, J. ------------------------------------------- B.A.No.3755 of 2008 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of June, 2008 ORDER This petition is for anticipatory bail. 2. According to the prosecution, certain materials used for the manufacture of liquor were found in the property belonging to the petitioner. 30 litres of wash were seized from the property. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was implicated only by a statement given by another accused in another sessions case. Petitioner is totally innocent of the allegations made. The article was not recovered from the property belonging to the petitioner and petitioner has absolutely no connection with the articles seized. 4. Learned public prosecutor submitted that the property stands in the name of the petitioner himself and that the attesting witnesses have also made statements that the materials were kept on the property by the petitioner itself. 5. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail. The petition is dismissed. K.HEMA, JUDGE csl