IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 29TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 18188 of 2007(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ T.UNNIKRISHNAN, SPECIAL EXTENSION OFFICER, TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, CHALAKKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.J.MATHEW RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, S.C/S.T/ DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CONVENER D.P.C. (LOWER) & THE DIRECTOR, SCHEDULED TRIBES DEVELOMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. NANDAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 18188 of 2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27.5.04 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXT.P2- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 6.10.05 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P2(a)- TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE SENIORITY LIST. EXT.P3- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.EST.E1.18852/05 DATED 23.2.06 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P4- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.E1-6790/06(1) DATED 13.11.06 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P5- TRUE COPY OF THE SELECT LIST APPROVED BY THE DPC PUBLISHED IN THE KERALA GAZATTE DATED 27.3.07 EXT.P6- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.E1.4127/05 DATED 28.3.07 EXT.P7- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.E1.4455/07 DATED 7.4.07 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P8- TRUE COPY OF THE SPECIAL RULES FOR THE KERALA SCHEDUELD TRIBES DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DATED 15.5.93 EXT.P9- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 30.4.07 (TRUE COPY) P.A TO JUDGE V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).18188/2007 -------------------- Dated this the 18th day of February, 2008 JUDGMENT Though several contentions have been urged in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage he only prays for a direction to the D.P.C to consider Ext.P9 taking note of Ext.P10 order. After having heard learned counsel on both sides, writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider Ext.P9 taking note of Ext.P10 also, before D.P.C next convenes. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs