-! Wi.WS Sali Ram Chaurasia S/o Shri Chaitu Ram, aged about-53 years, Head \\..^ry_ Master in the Government Girls ^••^Kp^ ^..y>"^.\€''...-^" Middle School, Surangpani Block- •'^J, ...->*'V •^.V'' "—"— -——--, Pathalgaon Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) ^^sy f'w i^ ^J^ <65F'A//"' il®"' c? S... -.^ ' » ' ^,^"".' VERSUS 1. Cs t;( C( 2. Shri G.S. Dhananjay S/o not known to the petitioner, aged about- 50 years, rhe then Comnussioner, Tribal Development, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.j * Shri M. S. Paraste S/o not known to the petitioner, aged about- 47 years, present Commissioner, Tribai Development, Raipur Distt. Raipur (f^ n \ -^J.I k<Tk1 i &. J ^f^.a f^/ »7: irif J^'&.^y' T] if"ai3>Tfe-^1 -^^ lUi s a. _..ftgite Y '"sy''^ '%^S4 XI-HC—78 3II^?I ^I Wl'h ^T^T 3TT^?T^tn^ HWW tb*<TcR 's^ ^n^Kn^, ®flly<Ko,fsidiy^ ^.....C^.^....C^..Kj^^i 3^V TT^7 (•^qf^SI^El) ^tiTWHfsa sn^n T8B : Hon'ble Stei MRntedira lllolMin Shirlvasta'ra, J.1 12.7.2011 None for fhe petitloner e Stui Pawan Kesfaarwani This contempt petitton Iijas been ffled by fhe petidoner aUeging willful disobedience offhe ord^r dated 5dl Februaiy, 2010 passed in W.P. (S) No. 7391/09. It has Leamed counsel for d averments made ia fhe reply, petitioner were requisititttied was consiuned to fhat proce petitioner has toeen flnally fhe respondents and fhere wa|! Court and as soon as relevaii' <^i<i[<n4t'f 'Rm^ff ^T "f^t -(.Fil^R ^3ifaiiaiit5i en in the secoiul round. couiKel for (he respondents, been atteged fhat (hough this Court had directed fhe respondentsj- aufhority to decide ttie petitioner's appeal wifhiu a period of 8 wejeks forna the date of recelpt of copy of fhe order, tfae appeal te m>t be|ng decided. fhe respondents, referring to tfae (tated ffaat after the OEder offhe Court was received, fhe relevant ntcords pertamu^ to fhe case of (he from different offices and some time ss, but, uManatefy fhe appeal erf fhe lecided vide order dated 18.2.2011. Learaed counsel for fhe res|poiidents submite fhat the dday in decidmg fhe appeal was bec4use of reasoiK beyond fhe eontrol of no intention to flout the aEder of the records were reoeived, fbe appeal of the petitionerwas considered and finally decided. .f XI-HC—78 sn^i^cf^fRr '?T8n 3TT^?T ^itlltft Praweea ~5^ ~^fWW<i, 8>tl)y'l(o, fqtliyy *11HCtr (hllcb "Wt 200 ST^T'q'HT ('^??^5!^'"!) TWW^fCTan^i -z- Leamed cozuMel for resppndents bave prayed for which was caused iu complyin pifi respbndents submtts ttiat fbe |uneonditional apology for the delay ib wifh the order ofthe ©ourt. Takuig into coiisidei^.ti^n counsel for Che respondenjts averments made ia fhe repfy| delay taas been caused in comt)! mclmed to proceed farfher ia (he submissions made by tearned taMng into coiisideration the land the Gircunistanoes in wbich fhe )tying fhe order ofthe Court, I am not ^he matter agaiiMt the respoiidente. , The rule is (herefore disi flnalfy disposed of. <ftl^^ri HMCll'^f fcl<ll <F>1<^K ^TsiRnsn^i 'taarged and (he petition te accordingty 8d/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge \^^wv mK^::