IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2446 of 2009 SUNITA KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 20.2.2009 Surendra/ Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. This Court having perused the impugned order would not find any error therein for a simple reason that the scheme itself envisages appointment of Anganwari Sevika for a particular category of person. The petitioner admittedly was not the resident of Ward No.38 but was somehow appointed as Anganwari Sevika in that Ward. Such appointment, therefore, being void ab initio and in the teeth of the guidelines issued by the Government, if same has been cancelled after giving opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and by a reasoned order, the same cannot be interfered by this Court exercising power of Article 226 of the Constitution of India. There is no error in the impugned order and accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.)