hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 756 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 756 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 756 OF 2006 Anil Pandurang Chimanpandey ... Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Smt. T.M. Koparkar for the Appellant. Ms. R.M. Gadhavi, A.P.P. for State. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATED: OCTOBER 20, 2008 DATED: OCTOBER 20, 2008 DATED: OCTOBER 20, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . There are two prayers sought in the present application. The first is that he may be treated as juvenile in conflict with law. He relies on the birth certificate issued by the Education Department, Karnataka State showing his date of birth as 1.6.1987. In response to the said certificate, an affidavit has been filed by Police Sub Inspector in which he has set out that he visited the concerned High School to make enquiry in order to verify the genuineness of the certificate. On enquiry with the school, he has been informed that the appellant was never admitted in the said school and neither was the certificate issued by them. Considering the above, in our opinion, prayer Clause (a) as prayed for can not be granted. . In so far as prayer Clause (b), it is prayed therein that during the pendency of consideration of the said application his sentence be stayed. As the prayer clause (a) itself cannot be granted, prayer Clause (b) also cannot be granted. Hence, application rejected. (A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.) (A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.) (A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)