IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1249 of 2007 SHYAM NARAYAN SINHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 16.9.2008. This contempt application has been filed alleging contempt of the order dated 20.6.2006 passed by this Court, quashing the order of punishment dated 19.10.2004. A show cause has been filed in which it has been stated that the order of punishment has been withdrawn in view of the order passed by this Court in C. W. J. No. 1579 of 2005 dated 20.6.2006. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although there is no order giving direction to the respondents to pay the consequential benefits to the petitioner but quashing of the order of punishment would naturally mean that the petitioner would be entitled to be paid monetary benefits which would accrue to him, as a result of revocation of the order of punishment. The petitioner should bring this fact to the notice of the authorities who should take appropriate step for payment of the legal dues of the petitioner within a period of six months. The contempt application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)