'^0 ...^.••-:-£::£^' ^^shfcfi0-- !N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHArTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P, No. 5 8 /2006 PETrTIQNER ^5^^^. .<?^'s ^rte^. ^i'* • _ ~A VfSf, ^,, ^, ^-"s^ •% a^L.... ~\^- ff c" '^ 4-. ^fl 11 '(^' ^i^y'" | ^.^,.-:^'/ ^^i^y RESPONDENTS ^D. Ravishankar, aged about 37 years, son ot' Shri D.V.S. Murti, working as S.D.0. (Police) Konta, Distt. South Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS ^l. State of Chhattisgarh, through - the SccTctaiy, Dcpartnicnt of Home AfFairs, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) The Director General of Police, ^ < F?* Head Quarter, Raipur (C.G.) /3. The Superintendent of Police, Dantewada, District South Bastar Chhattisgarh. WRI1L ^ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITimON_OF_INDIA FOg_ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/ CERTIORARI, ETC. OR DLRECTION / ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. n V- XI-HC-22 -yss ^qpnOTf, WlwT?, 'tora^ SII^T^T femyaii^T wRNi"gf5g 4^ •'•-^ te >a. .03- + _.Uz£..^/°i..... fs^w'g^w"'"'"'" ' aniffTRilwaf?? 9-1-200S ^rafeFilT.maf-9 fe3> •'f5R?R ^7 aifigir au^r Shri V.K. Panctey, Adv. for tjie petitioner. Shri S.S. Rajput, P.L. forth^State. Heard. The petitioner is an officer ^fVne rank of Dy. Superintendent of Police ar he was postea' at South Bastar. By response has been given and stiil dated 14-11-2005 passed by this order dated 3-8-2005 is stili in force Counsel for the petitioner N0.3639C005 and No.4656/2005, order dated 3-9-2005, he has been transferre as Dy. Superintendent of Poiice, ^cmomic Office Wing, Raipur, but he has ni been reiieved. He submits that he ^rote lettere dated 13-1 0-2005, 7-11-200; 18-10-2005 and 19-10-2005 which have beeri fiied as Annexure P-2 but n he has not been relieved. He further relied 01 the order dated 10-8-20uo passed i() W.P. No. 3639/2005 Annexure P-3 and Orde ;ourt in W.P. No. 4656/2005. He submiis tha points out that in simitar matters i.e. W.P. »rtaindirections have been Issued. He prays for similar order in the instant petitiofi. State oounsei is not in a pos On perusal of the record, transfer of the petitioner has been |tion to dispute.' jt is noted that the order dated 3-9-2005 for tassed and the same has not been varied or canceited, yetthe petitioner has not^aeen relieved, . Unger the cireumstances anc^ in view of the aforesaict ordere passed by this Court, a direction is issued to the c^mpetent authority to relieve the petitioner as earty as possible prererabiy withjn a period bf 15 da^ from the date of production/receipt of the copy of this| ora'er before the competent authority; With the aforesaid observatitjn, the pefition stands djsRosetLaL Certified copy as per rules. Sdf- Fakhruddin Judge [4^ya^ t^.