1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9558 OF 2009 Sandeep Harischandra Mahamunkar .. Petitioner. Vs. Sanjana Sandeep Mahamunkar .. Respondent. Mr.K.K.Pandey for the petitioner. Mr.Parineet Suratkar i/b SSP Legal for the respondent. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE, J. DATED : 23RD NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has impugned the order dated 30.9.2009 by which the respondent’s application for interim maintenance has been granted by the Family Court and the petitioner is directed to pay interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.2,000/- per month to the respondent-wife. I have perused the impugned order and other material placed before the court. It appears that the petitioner is working as electrical contractor which fact has not denied by the petitioner either before the family court or before this court. His monthly income is held to be Rs.10,000/- per month by the family court. I do not find any error of law warranting interference in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence the writ is dismissed. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)