IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20295 of 2010 KAUSHLENDRA SINGH @ GANDHI SON OF SRI SHIVDHAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 2.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the accused persons assaulted the informant and others in course of snatching a bag containing Rs.50,000/- and succeeded in doing so. The submission is that in fact the hotel owner filed a complaint against the prosecution, which is dated 25.3.2010 and in fact the entire case is cooked up. However, from the narrative of the first information report it appears that the informant had alleged at the earliest instance that the hotel owner was also involved in the transaction. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case will not be bifurcated for purposes of bail. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )