IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 863 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 304 OF 2002 MR. VITHAL RAMCHANDRA MALIYAR ... Applicant Versus VINOD KRISHNA VARIK AND ORS., ... Respondents Ms. A. Pereira, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S. Chopdekar, Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- S.B. DESHMUKH, J. Date:- 20th January, 2011 P.C.:- Heard learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties. It is a case of a death of the sole appellant and present is the application for condonation of around one year and 10 months' delay occurred in filing the application for setting aside the abatement of the appeal and for bringing the legal representatives of the deceased appellant on record. 2. After hearing the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties, I am of the view that this application can be considered favourably. According to the legal representatives of the deceased appellant whose names have been shown in paragraph 2 (a) to 2(d), they were not aware of the pendency of the appeal in this Court. They claim that they are the legal representatives of the deceased appellant. After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, I am of the view that this application can be allowed, condoning the delay of one year and 10 months, setting aside the abatement and bringing the legal representatives of the appellant on record. 3. The civil application, accordingly, is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (c) and disposed of. Necessary amendment to the cause title of the appeal to be carried out within two weeks. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. ssm.