THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.814 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner filed W.P.No.17235 of 2008 complaining that some of his retirements benefits, particularly, gratuity was withheld without any basis. The writ petition was disposed of on 08.08.2008, leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the respondents narrating his grievance. The respondents, in turn, were directed to pass appropriate orders as and when such representation is made. The petitioner states that though he made a representation, dated 20.12.2008, no action has been taken thereon. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. This contempt case was filed on 25.06.2009. The petitioner was under the impression that the respondents did not take any steps on his representation, dated 20.12.2008. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents has placed before this Court, a copy of the proceedings, dated 23.03.2009, through which the representation was considered. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the said communication, he has to work out his remedies separately. Hence, the contempt case is closed. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:21.08.2009 kdl