:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1228 OF 2006 Ketan K. Tirodkar ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Ms. Pallavi Ashar for petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, APP for State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B.H. B.H. B.H. MARLAPALLE, J. MARLAPALLE, J. MARLAPALLE, J. Dated: Dated: Dated: August August August 09, 2007. 09, 2007. 09, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This petition has been filed by the complainant in MCOC Special Case No. 4 of 2003 and subsequently impleaded as accused no.1 in MCOC Case No. 11 of 2004, challenging the order dated 7/6/2004 passed by the Special Court in MCOC Special Case No. 11 of 2004. . However, after the impugned order dated 7/6/2004 was passed, the Special Court passed an order on 6/12/2004 and issued an order of process against the original accused no.1 and so far as original accused no.2 is concerned, the Special Court has stated that if the evidence that comes before it during the trial of these two cases makes out a case :2: against the said accused no.2, the provisions of Section 319 of Cr.P.C. could be invoked so as to add her in the array of accused. . Hence, for the reasons stated in the judgment rendered today in Criminal Writ Petition No. 2564 of 2004, this petition fails at the threshold and the same is hereby rejected summarily. (B.H. (B.H. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.) Marlapalle,J.) Marlapalle,J.)