IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTISEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN. P R E S E N T THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA * * * WRIT PETITION Nos. 25149, 25192, 25193, 25201, 25202 & 25203 of 2007 Between: WP.No.25149 of 2007 Nallamothu Ram Babu … Petitioner V/s The Asst.Comissioner, Endowments Department, Khammam & Ors. …Respondents WP.No.25192 of 2007 Nakirikanti Bhaskar … Petitioner V/s. The Asst.Comissioner, Endowments Department, Khammam & Ors. …Respondents WP.No.25193 of 2007 Gandham Satyanarayana … Petitioner V/s. The Asst.Comissioner, Endowments Department, Khammam & Ors. …Respondents WP.No.25201 of 2007 Tula Surya Kumari … Petitioner V/s. The Asst.Comissioner, Endowments Department, Khammam & Ors. …Respondents WP.No.25202 of 2007 Kondumuri Parvathi … Petitioner V/s. The Asst.Comissioner, Endowments Department, Khammam & Ors. …Respondents WP.No.25203 of 2007 Nallamothu Keshamma … Petitioner V/s. The Asst.Comissioner, Endowments Department, Khammam & Ors. …Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner in all the above writ petitions … SRI PALIVELA SATYARAJA BABU Counsel for the Respondents … GP for Endowments Sri Ch.Satiksh Kumar Caveator for R2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA * * * WRIT PETITION Nos. 25149, 25192, 25193, 25201, 25202 & 25203 of 2007 COMMON ORDER: These batch of matters are coming up before this Court ‘for admission’ today. 2. The Assistant Govt.Pleader for Endowments takes notice on behalf of Respondents 1, 3 and 4. Sri Ch.Satish Kumar, the learned counsel takes notice on behalf of Respondent No.2. Sri Satish Kumar, the learned counsel placed certain proceedings before this Court and would submit that suppressing all these facts the writ petitioners have approached this court praying for appropriate reliefs and the writ petitions are liable to be dismissed. 3. On the contrary, Sri Palivela Satyaraja Babu submits that as against the orders in OA.Nos. 80, 82, 83, 84, 85 and 86 of 2006, dated 19-6-2007, the petitioners filed RP.Nos.35, 36, 37, 38, 39 and 40 of 2007 before the fourth respondent and the fourth respondent had issued notice to the respondents 1 to 3 and posted the matter on 01-12-2007. It is further stated that in the meanwhile, if the petitioners are thrown out of the respective premises, the petitioners would be put to heavy loss. 4. This Court is not inclined to express any opinion in-as- much-as it is stated that RP.Nos. 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 and 40 of 2007 are pending before the fourth respondent. Let the fourth respondent dispose of the RP.Nos. 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 and 40 of 2007 on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and till then statusquo should be maintained. 5. With the above direction, the writ petitions are accordingly disposed of at the stage of admission. No costs. JUSTICE P . S . NARAYANA . 27/11/2007. Furnish CC of the order Tomorrow. B/O. IsL.