IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45046 of 2008 RAMESH TIWARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05 01.02.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Sections 386 and 302 of the Penal Code. Although petitioner is not named in the F.I.R, but, in course of investigation, his named appeared as one of the accuseds involved in the case. It does appear from the bail application as well as the impugned order, that the petitioner carries criminal antecedent. Looking to the text and texture of the allegations and the materials available on record, this Court is not inclined to admit him to anticipatory bail. Prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected. Needless to observe that in the event if the petitioner surrender before the Court below and apply for regular bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit uninfluenced by the present order passed by this Court in the present proceeding. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)