In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … C.W.P. No. 19357 of 2011 Date of decision: 5.12.2011 Harvinder Singh and others ..Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.M.Kumar Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Narain Raina Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Addl.A.G.Punjab for the respondents. .. 1. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? M.M.Kumar,J. 1. Mr. Akshay Bhan, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous at this stage. As and when further cause of action would arise, the same shall be availed by the petitioners. The aforesaid statement has been made in view of the fact that on the last date of hearing, learned Addl. A.G. Punjab has pointed out that fresh notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, the “Act”)has been issued in the English Daily 'Hindustan Times' and Punjabi Daily 'Rozana Ajit' Jalandhar on 9.11.2011 and the further notification under Section 6 read with Section 17 of the Act was also to be issued. 2. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE December 5,2011 (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) nk JUDGE