^^) ln the Honble Hiflh Court of Chhattishaarh at Bilaspyr (C.G.) W.P.(S)No. J3'^^ 200^- Petitioner ...........;.....-Smt. UshO.Chinoriya 'l^;- ,^^y'/ w^^^~ ^:'^-" .,.'"".,ts^>- i-yy :^/" . \y--' ( Before Marriage Ku. Usha Lal) Aged51 years W/o Shri Sheo Kumar Chinoriya, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Titurdeeh No.-1, District, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS Respondent... ^_. J<The State Government of Chhattishgarh, ro;^ Through the Secretary, Education Department ^-\v] ,-C'^.\^ \^' D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) ^\^ -L.--.-'.~.'^''~"""17 >> ^2-The District Education Officer, Durg (C.G) t>-o <^nt petition under artictes 226 of the Constitution of India. mW COURT OF CT1HATTIS6ARH AT BILAS^R SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PETTnON (S.) N0. 735 OF 2007 Petitioner Respondents yersus Smt. Usha Chinoriya The State Sovernment of Chhattisgarh and another Present : Mr. Somkant Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Satish Supta, Dy. 6ovt. Advocate for the StaTe/respondenTs. Oft&ER (Passed on 7th Day of February, 2007) t. Learned counse} appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law invohi'ed in the present writ petition we squarely covered by the decision of +his Court- in the coa of in the case of Yashwaivt Kumw BhaiwtlwaJ vs. Mwiieipal Cwpwatiwv. C>wy w^ wwthe^. 2. Tn sub%quent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 {Styesh KWWP Veiwa'ss. Ttie Sterte Sovt. of Clihaff-iyarii and enethe^ oind other connected matters. decided by this Court on 15-12-2006, pursliant to -the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and the pro^>ectus of Diploma in Education Examination. it was clarified that the nomenclature of 1+ie Basic Troining Institute, i.e., B.T.I. .rBVSK.S'SSMK aa • ^B • Th^ur has been changed ond renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordmgly, •Hie O.Ed. Certificate holders are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (5.) No.4130 of 2005 ^&yesh KUHW Vmwa vs. The Sfate Sovt. of Chhattisgw^ and arwthet) (Supra). For the aforementioned reasons, the writpetition is disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court- in the matter of Yadiwwt Kumar BharadwaJ^Suyo^, a.ibject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner has ucquired O.Ed. Certificate at his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and furHier whether he has been paid two advonce increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Ags Judge 1 2006QDWJR-C696 na