IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28874 of 2009 PRAMOD KUMAR SHARMA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 28.08.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under diverse Sections of the Penal Code including Section 364 of the Penal Code and later Section 302 of the Penal was added. Allegation as per F.I.R. is that 07 years old grand son of the informant was taken away by the petitioner and some other accused persons named in the F.I.R. The dead body of the boy was subsequently recovered. It appears from the impugned order that the petitioner was arrested and he made inculpatory statement setting out in detail the manner in which the boy was done to death by throttling and consigned his dead body in a well. It appears subsequently the dead body of the boy fished out from a well. This court finds from the impugned order that the witnesses in course of investigation, supported the factum of occurrence as also the fact that the petitioner was seen carrying the victim just prior to the occurrence. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that because of family dispute he has been implicated in this case. It is next contended that he is agnate. It appears that petitioner is in custody since 17.06.2008. 2 Having regard to the allegations and the materials collected in support thereof, this court is not inclined to admit him to bail. Prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected. This court, however, takes into consideration the submission and the fact that petitioner is in custody since 17.06.2008, grants liberty to the petitioner to renew prayer for bail if the trial itself is not taken up within 08 months from the date of receipt/communication of a copy of this order in the court below. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)