IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.: 3954 of 2010-D. Decided on: 14.11.2011. ___________________________________________ Subhash Chand. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, Judge, (Oral): Mr. Ajay Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present lis is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Prakam Singh Pathania Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, CWP-T No.2890 of 2008, decided on 24.06.2011. 2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner strictly as per the principles laid down in the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - judgment cited hereinabove, within a period of four weeks from today. In case the petitioner’s grievance is redressed, he will be entitled to all the consequential benefits. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 14, 2011. (sck).