IN TH E H IGH COURT OF UTTARANCH AL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1389 (S/ S) of 2004 Ramesh Das S/ o Late Sri Galthu Das, R/ o G – 2, Roshnabad Collectorate Quarter, District – Haridwar Uttaranchal. … Petitioner Versus District Magistrate, District – Haridwar. … Respondent Sri Nandan Arya, Manoj Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel for the State. H on ’ble M.M. Gh ild iya l, J . Heard Sri Nandan Arya, Manoj Mohan learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State. Learned counsel for both the parties are agreed that the writ petition may be decided at admission stage itself. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner, who is working Ahalmad (Clerk) in Special Land Acquisition Office, Roshanabad, District – Haridwar, has challenged the order dated 18.11.2004 dated by District Magistrate, Haridwar by which he has been put under suspension on the ground of carelessness and dereliction in the Government duties. The suspension order shows that Tehsildar, Haridwar has been appointed as Inquiry Officer. The petitioner has submitted that he has yet not received the chargesheet. Respondent is directed to issue chargesheet to the petitioner within a period of ten days from the date of production of certified copy of this order and thereafter, the Inquiry Officer shall conclude the inquiry within four weeks. The petitioner is directed to cooperate with the Inquiry. Final order shall be passed and communicated to the petitioner latest by 30 th January 2005. In case the above exercise is not completed within prescribed period, the suspension order shall stand ineffective automatically. With this direction the writ petition is finally disposed of. (M.M. Gh ild iya l, J .) December 2, 2004: S.K.Sharma