Crl. Writ Petition No.834 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Writ Petition No.834 of 2010 Date of Decision : 27th July, 2011 Narayan .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, Amicus Curiae for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. * * * * L.N.MITTAL, J. (ORAL) Application sent by post by Narayan to Hon'ble the Chief Justice of this Court has been registered as instant criminal writ petition and listed on judicial side. It is alleged in the application that petitioner's wife Birmati and sons Sonu and Raju had been illegally detained by Ramjit Singh Panwar, his brother and one Naresh, since 05.04.2010 onwards. On the preceding date of hearing, Birmati and Sonu alleged detenues, came present in person in the Court and stated that the alleged third detenue Raju was also in the village but could not appear in Court being indisposed. Today Sonu alleged detenue is present in person and states that his mother Birmati and brother Raju are at their house. Fresh status report filed today in Court by State counsel is taken on record. Heard. Crl. Writ Petition No.834 of 2010 -2- Perusal of the reply dated 11.05.2011 filed by the State reveals that the petitioner has grossly abused the process of this Court. The petitioner does not reside at the address given in the application and rather had sold the said house 10-15 years ago. The petitioner is also proclaimed offender in FIR No.146 dated 12.08.2008 under Section 420 IPC of Police Station Bhupani, District Faridabad. The petitioner is also wanted as accused in a police case of Delhi and is absconding. It is also mentioned in the reply that Birmati herself appeared before Commissioner of Police, Faridabad on 10.05.2010 and made application Annexure R-1 and thereupon FIR has since been registered. Petitioner's wife Birmati had not been abducted by anybody. In view of the aforesaid, no further order or direction is required in the instant criminal writ petition, which is accordingly dismissed. ( L. N. MITTAL ) JUDGE 27th July, 2011 'raj'