IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12447 of 2005 DEEN DAYAL PRASAD, son of Sri Dev Chandra Singh, resident of Village and Post Office –Dindir, P S – Haspura, District – Aurangabad, at present posted as Assistant in District Revenue Section at Aurangabad. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through its Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Collector cum District Magistrate, Aurangabad. 3. The Additional Collector, Aurangabad. 4. The Establishment Deputy Collector, Aurangabad. 5. The District Establishment Promotion Committee. ----------- 03. 27.9.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the fact that the basic relief which he was seeking has already been granted by the respondents. Supporting notifications has also been produced by the counsel for the State in this regard. Though it is not part and parcel of the relief of the main writ application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the given circumstance he ought to be paid salary for the period he was dismissed till he was reinstated as his appeal was allowed by the Divisional Commissioner. Let the petitioner move the competent authority in this regard with such claim, who shall be obliged to take a decision and communicate the same to the petitioner within a reasonable time. The writ application otherwise has become infructuous. It is dismissed as such. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)