{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.133 OF 2011 Ratan s/o Babulal Ingle & others Appellants Versus The Brijwadi Managing Committee Kabrasthan, through Fatrushah s/o Ishaqshah & another Respondents Mr. P.R.Katneshwarkar, advocate for appellants. Mr. Mr.M.A. Momin, advocate holding for for respondent no.1. Mr.M.B.W. Khan, advocate for respondent no.2. CORAM : S.S.SHINDE, J. DATE : 19 th September, 2011 PER COURT: Heard learned Counsel for the Revision Applicant for some time. Learned Counsel for the Revision Applicant has no objection to dispose of this Civil Revision Application if the Wakf Tribunal is directed to dispose of Wakf Suit No.96/2008 within three months from today. Learned Counsel for respective respondents submit that there is huge pendency before the Wakf Tribunal and, therefore, the suit may be directed to be decided within six months. Without entering into merits of the matter, ends of {2} justice would meet if the Maharashtra State Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad, is directed to decide Wakf Suit No.96/2008 within four months from the receipt of the order passed by this Court. Accordingly, the Maharashtra State Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad, is directed to dispose of Wakf Suit No.96/2008 within four months from the receipt of order passed by this Court. It is needless to mention that till the suit is disposed of, the interim order dated 16.08.2010, passed by the Presiding Officer, Maharashtra State Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad, shall remain in operation. Civil Revision Application is disposed of accordingly. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter and this order is passed on the concession given by the learned Counsel for respective parties. It is needless to mention that parties to the suit may not ask for unnecessary adjournments unless there is extraordinary circumstance and cooperate the Tribunal in disposal of Wakf Suit No.96/2008. S.S.SHINDE JUDGE adb/cra133.11