IHL HIGH COURT OF KARNA 4K CIRCLII BINC”H 41 DHARWAD 1 4 LI IRJ 611 1 K T ! HE HON BLE MR JUSTICE AR%VflD K MAT C CCC No.2262/2011 :2: complying the order dated 12/03/20 10 passed in W.P No.61378-383/2010, vide Annexure-A, so far as complainant is concerned. eectm act This 6coming on for orders this day, N.Kumar, j, v.da aiamba made the following: ORDER Complainant has preferred this contempt petition complaining of disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.61378-383/2010 dated 12.03.2010. In para 3 of the said order, it is observed as under: 3. If the petitioners’ case is squarely covered by the order of this court, the benefit be extended to the petitioners.” 2. It is not in dispute that after the said order was passed, the case of the complainant has been considered by the authorities and rejected by an endorsement, which is stated to have been issued after the service of notice in this petition. Grievance of the complainant is that the endorsement is illegal; his case is squarely covered by the earlier orders of this Court and he is entitled to the benefit of payment of gratuity arrears. I NI N II ( Ni ‘ IC 1) ii 1 )( T CC It