THE HIGH COURT OF KARNAT(A AT BGALORE DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE 1998 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V.K.SINGHAL WRIT PETITION NOS. 4779 to 4781 OF 1994 BETWEEN: W. P.No. 4779/94 1. Sri D,Venkatesh, Proprietor, M/s Shakti Treads, 292/13, Peenya Industrial Estate, Bangalore—58. aged about 39 years. s/o Sri IC.B.D. Panth. ..Petitioner. W. P,NO, 4780/94 2. Sri D.Venkatesh, Proprietor, M/s Shakti Treads, 292/13, Peenya Industrial Estate, Bangalore-58. aged about 39 years, S/o Sri K.B.D.Panth. .,Petitioner. W. P. No.4781/94 3. Sri D.Venketesh, proprietor, M/s Shakti Treads, 292/13, Peenya Industrial Estate, Bangalore58, aged about 39 years, Sb Sri K.B,D,Panth, ,.Petitioner, (By N/s Ramabhadran, Advs.) . . .2 —2— AND: 1. The Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, District Circle—Vt, Bangal ore. 2 The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, (Adminstration), City Division-Il, Bangalore. . .Respondents. (Common in all petitione) (By Smt. S.Sujatha, HCGP) Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 of the Contitutjn of India with an affidavit praying to quash the order dt.24.12.93 passed by the R—2 vide Annex-J K and L etc., Writ Petition is coming on for Orders this day, the Coirt made the followings ORDER The Petitioner has challenged the order of Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes in the proceeding under Section 21 of K.S.T.Act, 1957. The appeal / —3- The appeal lies to the Tribunalhere are, certain factual matters are also as according to the petitioner the evidence was produces, but according to the respondent it was not produced. It will be proper in the facts and circdmstances of this case, an appeal is filed within six weeks from today. If the appeal is filed within the aforesaid period, objection of limitation would not be taken. Petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of appeal. Sd/-JUDGE. LC r.by; I çc c.by; / flIom