IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.26277 OF 2009 JITENDRA RAI, SON OF DHANESHWAR RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PAIGA SHEKHAPURA, P.S. AMNOUR, DISTRICT SARAN VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 30.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under sections 394 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It is said that petitioner and another accused intercepted the informant and took away Rs.400/- from his pocket. From Annexure-2 it appears that Rs.400/- was recovered and seized from the pocket of Bhola Rai. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no recovery from the pocket of petitioner. Petitioner is in judicial custody since 01.02.2009. Neither the order of the court below nor the case diary mentions any criminal antecedent of petitioner. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this application is allowed. Let petitioner (Jitendra Rai) be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial - 2 - Magistrate, Saran, Chapra in Bheldi P.S. Case No.11 of 2009 with conditions as laid down in sub-section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)