:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. SUIT NO. 3241 OF 2003 SUIT NO. 3241 OF 2003 SUIT NO. 3241 OF 2003 VIRENDRA J. MISHRA .....Plffs. Plffs. Plffs. vs. MANOJ S. MISHRA AND ORS. .....Defnds. Defnds. Defnds. Anil Agarwal for the plaintiffs. Kamal Khatta i/by. RMG Law Associates for defendant no.1. Y.R. Shah for defendant no. 2A to 2D. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 22nd February, 2006. P.C. :. 1. The parties have filed consent terms duly signed by the parties and their advocates. Consent taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. There shall be order in terms of the consent terms. Suit disposed off in terms of the consent terms. Undertaking accepted. Both the parties have tendered three power of atttorneys. The same are taken on record. 2. In view of the disposal ofthe suit itself, :2: Notice of Motion No. 3044 of 2003 does not survive. The same is dismissed as infructious. Refund of court fees,if any, as per rules. sd/- **********