IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.64783-M of 2006 Date of decision: 14th January, 2009 Taro Bai and others … Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Mehardeep Singh, Assistant Advocate General Punjab for the State. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition, to raise all arguments before the trial Court. Counsel further submits that this Court, vide order dated 19th October, 2006 had exempted the personal appearance of Taro Bai and Reshma, subject to their filing an application before the trial Court. Counsel states that personal appearance of all the three accused has been exempted before the trial Court. In view of this, personal appearance of the petitioners, before the trial Court, is exempted, subject to their filing an undertaking that they shall cause their appearance as and when required by the trial Court. They shall also file an undertaking that the evidence, if any, recorded in their absence but in the presence of their counsel, shall be binding upon them. The trial Court may incorporate any other conditions in the undertaking to be submitted by the accused. As prayed, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty aforesaid. [KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE January 14, 2009 rps