IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9146 of 2011 SURENDRA RAWAT @ SURENDRA KUMAR RAWAT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 31.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the uncle of the bridegroom is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 420, 406, 500/34 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It appears that for the marriage of nephew of this petitioner initially Rs. 45,000/- was taken from the complainant and subsequently, one lakh rupees was also demanded. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was working in the Assam Riffle, hence he could not appear earlier. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, namely Surendra Rawat @ Surendra Kumar Rawat in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Complaint Case No. 220 C of 2007 , subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petitioner has given an undertaking that he will co-operate during the trial. Anand Kr. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)