CAO. 202-11 - 1 - VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION No. 202 OF 2011 IN REVIEW PETITION (St.) 13430 OF 2011 Kailas Laxman Shedge ...Applicant Vs. Vasant Laxman Shedge ...Respondent *** None for the Applicant. Mr. Nitin V. Gangal, for the Respondent. *** CORAM: V. M. KANADE J. DATE : JUNE 29, 2011 P.C. . None appears on behalf of the applicant. On the last date also neither the applicant nor his counsel was present. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent has invited my attention to the affidavit-in-reply. It is submitted that the applicant has filed the Second Appeal and this Second Appeal was also dismissed by an order dated 4th February, 2011. Thereafter execution proceedings were taken out by the respondent and the an application in the said proceeding was filed by the CAO. 202-11 - 2 - applicant herein, seeking adjournment on the ground that Special Leave Petition was preferred by him in the Apex Court against the order passed by this Court in the Second Appeal. Thereafter, another application was filed in which it is stated that Letters Patent Appeal is being filed by the applicant before the Division Bench of this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent that frivolous applications are filed for taking the dates in the executing court. It appears that applicant herein is not keen in pursuing the present application for condonation of delay caused in filing the review application. Civil Application is therefore, dismissed. Consequently, the Review Application does not survive for consideration which is, accordingly, disposed of. [ V. M. KANADE J.]