IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39356 of 2009 SUNNY THAKUR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 4. 5.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The allegations are serious under Sections 302 and 34 of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act against four unknown. The informant is not an eye witness but made statements on hearsay without disclosing the name of the informer. The eye witness refused to make any disclosures. The impugned order of rejection discloses that investigation in such a serious offence has been done on basis of confessional statement of the petitioner only, wholly inadmissible in evidence. The confession also has not been discussed if he was the assailant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in connection with Fatwah P.S. Case No. 134/2009. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)