srk 1 pil-220-10.sxw THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.220 OF 2010 Rajendra Madhukar More ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents Mr.P.R. Arjunwadkar for the petitioner. Mr.Sandeep Dere for respondent No.9. Mr. V.D. Patil, Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 7. CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. Friday, January 7, 2011 P.C. In this petition purporting to be PIL, the petitioner, residing at Palghar, District Thane challenges the Government notification dated 17th August, 2010 establishing new RTO office at Borivali upon bifurcation of existing office of RTO, Mumbai (West) and new office of RTO at Vasai upon bifurcation of office of RTO, Thane and establishing a new office of the RTO at Panvel. 2. It is contended that instead of establishing new offices at Borivali, Vasai and Panvel which are at closer distances, RTO office is required to be opened at Palghar. 3. If the petitioner and other residents are of the view that new RTO office is required at Palghar, it is open to the petitioner and others to make a srk 2 pil-220-10.sxw representation to the State Government in this behalf. However, that cannot be a ground for entertaining this petition for challenging the Government notification dated 17th August, 2010. 4, In case the petitioner or other residents of Palghar make a representation for establishing a new RTO office at Palghar, the State Government will consider the same in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. CHIEF JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.