IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Delay Condonation Application No.2091/2008 IN Defective First Appeal No.02 of 2008 Smt. Nirmal Kaur ………….. Petitioner Versus S.Mahendra Singh Lahoria ………… Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Dated: April 22, 2008 None is present for the appellant. Report of the stamp reporter shows that there are several defects in this appeal as neither the certified copy of the judgment (challenged in the present appeal) is filed with the memorandum of appeal nor the bench copy is filed and nor the age of the deponent is shown in the affidavit. There is also deficiency in the court fee paid by the appellant. The note/order sheet shows that since January, 2008, the appellant was given several opportunities to remove the defects but he failed to remove the same. In the above circumstances, the memorandum of appeal is rejected. The appeal stands dismissed. (Delay Condonation Application No.2091/08 also stands dismissed in default of the applicant/appellant). (Dharam Veer, J.) (Prafulla C.Pant, J.) 22.04.2008 Rajeev Dang