IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1600 of 2011 1. Bhuneshwar Bind @ Bodhu Bind, son of Late Badho Bind. 2. Rakesh Bind, son of Late Nandlal Bind. 3. Chhotkun Bind, Son of Late Nandlal Bind. 4. Suresh Bind, Son of Late Badho Bind. 5. Teju Bind, son of Suresh Bind. All are residents of Village-Mokar, Police Station and District-Jehanabad………………………………………………………………..Petitioners. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…………………………………………….……..Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 11.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 341, 323, 308/504 of the I.P.C. There is specific allegation against petitioner no.2 and petitioner no.5 to have assaulted the brother of the informant. Hence, their anticipatory bail application is rejected. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner no.3 has already been arrested. Hence his application has become infructous. Considering the fact that there is no specific allegation against petitioner nos. 1 and 4, let petitioner no. 1, Bhuneshwar Bind @ Bodhu Bind and petitioner no. 4, Suresh Bind, be released on bail in - 2 - the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 497 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. So far as petitioner nos. 2 and 5 are concerned, let the learned court below consider their regular bail application when petitioners surrender and pray for regular bail without being prejudiced the order of the court keeping in mind that both sides are co-villagers and they have fought for petty dispute. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)