IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 2811 of 2007 Date of Decision: October 05, 2010 Atma Ram . …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Sushil Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana, for respondent No.1. Mr. Rameshwar Malik, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 16.11.2006 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Guhla, as well as, order dated 29.03.2007 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Kaithal, whereby C.R. No.2811 of 2007 application moved by the defendant-petitioner herein under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC was dismissed. Learned counsels, appearing on behalf of the parties, fairly stated that present petition be decided with their consent in the following terms:- 1. Impugned orders dated 16.11.2006 passed by learned Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Guhla, and order dated 29.03.2007 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Kaithal stand set aside. 2. Application moved by the defendant – petitioner herein under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C. stands allowed and ex-parte decree dated 23.02.2004 is set aside and civil suit No.56 of 2000 is restored to its original number. 3. Trial Court shall decide the suit as early as possible, preferably within six months from the date of certified copy of this order is placed before the Trial Court. 4. Petitioner shall pay Rs.5.000/- as costs to the respondents herein. 5. Parties shall appear before the learned Trial Court on 28th October, 2010 for further orders. Petition shall stand disposed of with the consent of the parties in the aforesaid terms. October 05, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2 C.R. No.2811 of 2007 3