IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Review Application No. 881 of 2011 in Writ Petition No. 2262 (M/S) of 2011 Surjeet Singh S/o Late Sri Gyan Singh -Petitioner Versus Smt. Savita Bhargava W/o Late Sri Purshottam Bhargava and two others -Respondents Mr. N.S. Negi, Advocate for review petitioner. Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate for respondents. [Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. (Oral)] Heard Mr. N.S. Negi, Advocate for review petitioner and Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate for respondents. By means of review application the petitioner has prayed for recalling the order dated 19-10-2011 passed by this court in W.P. No. 2262(M/S) of 2011, Surjeet Singh Vs. Smt. Savita Bhargava and others and the matter be heard on merit. The ground taken in the review application is that the petitioner was not made party in the release application and his brother was made party. According to petitioner himself he preferred the revision against the release order that was dismissed. If in the release application his brother was a party, he might have been residing with his father and as per definition of ‘tenant’ in section 3(a) of U.P. Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, on the tenant’s death his heirs normally resided with him in the building at the time of his death, shall be deemed ‘tenant’. Further more brother of review petitioner against whom release application was moved has not preferred the writ petition and never moved impleadment application before the writ court. No good ground is made out to review the order passed by this court. The review application is dismissed. ISB (B.S. Verma, J.) 30-11-2011