HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR W.P.(227) No. 6049 of 2009 PETITIONER Defendant RESPONDENTS Plaintiff Lucky Soni (Minor) S/o Shri Rswati Lal Soni, aged about 10 years Through Father Rewati Lal Soni S/o Shri Ramji Soni R/o Village- Rahod, Tah.— Pamgarh, DiStrict Janjgir- Champa ‘ (Chhattisgarh) Versus Ramayan Das S/o late Shri Fauda Panika Aged about not known R/o Village— Rahod, Tah.- Pamgarh, District Janjgir—Champa (Chhattisgarh) State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, District Janjgir-Champa (0G,) (Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India) Appearance : Mr. Rakesh Dubey, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Suryakant Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.2 on advance copy. ORDER (23. 10.2009) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard. Being aggrieved with last part of the order dated 23.9.2009, passed in Civil Suit No. 7A/2007 by the Civil Judge, Class—II, Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa (C,G.), the defendant has filed this writ petition. By the said part of the order, an application under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. filed by the plaintiff has been allowed and plaintiff hasbeen permitted to incorporate the relief in the plaint relating to perfection of title by way of adverse possession. A perusal of the order would show that the trial Court has given opportunity to the defendant to file consequential amendment. The defendant has full liberty to raise'his grievance against the said relief claimed by the plaintiff in the plaint. The trial Court has also observed in the order that after filing of the consequential \/ l W.P.(227) No. 6049 of 2009 3‘ I 5 A /‘-\ r any additional issuéir‘equired \ - amendment, it shall 100k as to whethe to be framed. On due consideration of the submission of the learned counsel ason to interfere with the order for the petitioner, I do not find any re passed The by the petition trial Court. has no merit. The same is liable to be dismissed accordingly dismissed at the motion stage itself. /,,_»a ,/yaw/El- S sw t and is val“ / w