1 Cri.Appln.No.1621/2011 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1621/2011 ( Nitin Ganesh Sable Vs. The State of Maharashtra ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. RR Imale Adv. for Applicant/s; Mr. VH Dighe, APP for State. *** CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 28 th April, 2011. 1) Heard finally. 2) The accused/applicant allegedly on 20th March, 2011, on a trivial issue of the complainant’s properly fixing or setting an antenna of TV, the accused/applicant, threw a stone. Being asked and questioned, the accused/applicant, with a razor in his hand, brutally assaulted the complainant, for which the matter was reported to the police on 21st March, 2011. 3) The learned counsel submits, even if the order of the learned Sessions Judge informs of 30-35 stitches suffered by the complainant, he was discharged on the very next day, as could be seen, being so referred in the FIR. The affairs are dated 20th March, 2011. The accused in custody since then, no criminal record. Learned Counsel agrees that the accused/applicant will not reside within the jurisdiction of MIDC CIDCO police action. Hence order. 2 Cri.Appln.No.1621/2011 4) The accused/applicant – Nitin Ganesh Sable, be released in Crime No.I-52/2011 for an offence under Section 307 of IPC on his furnishing PR bond and a surety in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand). The accused/applicant, after his release, shall not live within the jurisdiction of MIDC CIDCO police station Aurangabad till filing of charge sheet. However, the accused/applicant shall attend the Investigator whenever so commanded, for that purpose, the restriction is relaxed. 5) The accused/applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected. 6) The accused/applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7) Application allowed as above. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/