IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.3666 of 2009 Between: Samba Nageswar Rao. ..... Petitioner AND 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P.Secretariat, Hyderabad and 6 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.A.Samir Kumar Reddy Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 5: Asst. Government Pleader for Home Counsel for Respondent Nos.6 and 7:---- Order: In this Writ Petition, the petitioner’s grievance is that respondent No.4, at the behest of respondent Nos.6 and 7, has been frequently calling him to the Police Station and harassing him. On instructions, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5 submitted that the petitioner has made a complaint against respondent Nos.6 and 7, in respect of a dispute over immoveable property; that on making GD entry, respondent No.4 started making enquiries in order to find out whether respondent Nos.6 and 7 have committed any offence and that the petitioner was being summoned to the Police Station only to elicit information, in this regard, from him. She further submitted that no Crime has been registered against the petitioner and that the petitioner himself is not willing to co-operate with the Police to investigate into the complaint filed by him and that the Police will not insist on his presence any further and interfere with his personal liberty. This statement of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is placed on record and the Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.4785 of 2010, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 2nd March, 2010 lur