^V^L- Sing?®Bsneh IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (Sl No. ^, OF 2011. PETITIONER .^w^ 1^.^^^ *^>/;'J--?' ^^y ^~.Mty ^y^ ^••'^' :-•' Smt. Nirmala Baghel, W/o. late Shri Man Bahal Ram Baghel, aged about 30 years, ••R/o. Village Hingajhar, Post Kodagaon, Tahsil Charama, District Kanker (C.G.) ^•^ VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G. 2. Assistant Conimissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Kanker, Distf. Kanker (C. G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Charama, Distt. Kanker (C. G.) 4. Treasuiy Officer, "•*.: Treasury Account and Pehsion, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C. G.) ..V-^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA sn^r^if^w Tman^iaTtfe •i 3'ST "41-41d'4, 0ti1y'is, [slOI'M^ .u.^.....n.^..!. a^T^ •q5RT (^f^^r) ^niw^fCTan^i SB s Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mr. Somkant Verma, coi Ms. Siinita Jain, Panel on advance copy. Heard on admission. Leamed counsel appeaj deceased- Man Bahal Ram B entitled to benefit of two ad\ havtag passed B.T.I. exaniing own cost. It is submitted tha petition is no longer res inte ^decided by the Hon'ble Su]: Saxena. vs. State ofM.P. &^ It is further submitted similar view in its ordei W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Le further dra.ws attention of thi passed in Writ Appeal No. 124 judgnaent ol' the Supreme C (suprat and fhe order uassed 1: '*iifff4l4 im?if'? fe^ <r"]fe;ii ^3iRn3?i^?r insel for the petitioner. La\wer for the State/resDondents, •iiig for the petitioner submits that aghel, husbaiid of the petitioneriAs (ance increments on account of he {tion before his appointment at. his =(t the issue tnvolved in the present ^ra and the same has been finaUy le Court in fhe case of <prs., 2009 Su]^rem that this Court has also taken a dated 06-02-2009 passed in amed coiinsel for the petitioner ^5 Court to order dated 29-04-2010 of 2009, wherem relymg upon fhe ourt in the case of Asha. Sasena iy this Court ia another Writ Appeal ^^'-^•'"^ssip'ri, '•sassa&tEi 'Ltet.. 'vy .'": ''^^y' XI-HG—'i ^ST "ifl^ld^, »Ttl<4J|(o, fqOI'My ?n^?r TPRT (^cif^<tT) SIRg W R;'ii+ WTan^ignNf \- » Praveea No.87/2009, directions have case for grant of two advanc^ 21-09-1974 issued by the verific9.tion of the facts pleade^ ibeen issued for consideration of the tacrements as per circular dated. |State of Madhya Pradesh, after fi in fhe petition. Learned coT-msel for fh) deceased- Man Bahal Ram would also be considered on increDients as per circular dal of CODV of this order. 'c:b!'4[<rl4l''i 'qW^ff ^f f^st Tf^T'^.K' CP^sifmsn^i respondents submits ftiat. case ol' pagheL husband of the petitioner saiae Unes. ttie In view of the stateiijient made 'ahove, this petition is finally disposed of with a dir^ction to fhe respondent autborities to consider aad decide fhe claim of deceased- Man Bahal Ram. Baghel, husband of fhe pefitioner for grant of twro advance ed 21-09-1974 issued bv the State .of Madhya Pradesh, after verjfication of the facts pleaded in ttie petition, within a period of th^ee months from the date of receipt Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge .i