IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2009 / 1ST MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 2204 of 2009(K) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- DIPNA JOSHY, THYPARAMBIL HOUSE, ELAMAKKARA, EDAPPALLY SOUTH, COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.B.PREMOD RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL SECTION, MALIPPURAM VYPPIN. ADDL. R2 IMPLEADED. 2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL SECTION, VYPIN. ADDL. R2 IS SUO MOTU IMPLEADED VIDE JUDGMENT IN W.P.C.2204/2009 DATED 21.1.2009. BY SC SRI. P.P. THAJUDEEN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No. 2204 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel. 2. Petitioner challenges Ext.P6. Learned Standing Counsel points out that Ext.P6 can be treated as provisional bill and the petitioner can file objection against the same. 3. The Assistant Engineer, Kerala State Electricity Board, Electrical Section, Vypin is impleaded as additional second respondent. Standing Counsel appears for the additional respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as follows: If the petitioner files objection before the additional second respondent within ten days from today, the additional second respondent will consider the objection and take a decision on the same in accordance with law with opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Till such time as a decision is taken, there will be no disconnection pursuant to Ext.P6. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) sb