(£3 IN THE HIGICOUR’I‘ OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ggmo. MU, /2oa2 PETITIONERS 1)Ku. Vinita Agrawal D/o Jagdish Prasad Agrawal, Aged about 38 years; 2)Ku. Sunita Agrawal D/o Jagdish Prasad Agrawal, Ageé about 34 years: 3)Tarkeshwar Agrawal S/o Jagdish Prasad Agrawal, Aged about 45 years; 4)Gyaneshwar Agrawal, S/o Jagdish Agrawal, Aged about 44 years, All residents of village Devkar, Tehsil Saja. Distt. Durg (CG). RE S13ONDE§IT S 1)Smt. Padmavati W/o Late Shri Narsigh Prasad R/o Village Devkar,Teh.Saja, gristt. Durg (CG) .. Aged about 76 years, 2) State of Chhattisgarh Through the isecretary, Raipur (CG) . 3)Additional Collector, Bemetarfrrxbistt. Burg (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF EHa. CONSTZETUTION OF IN‘DIA Revenue Department, DKs Bhawan, WW WW 24/07/2002. _ Shri P. Diwakar, Advocafe with Shri Sandee Yadav for the p petiu'onexs. Shn’ Ranbir Singh, GA f0 the rcspoudcnts/ Stats. Having heard learned co sel, the Comt is not inclined to entertain this writ petition as ‘ its opinion the subject matter of dispute needs to‘be adjudicated upon by the common law forum. \ It is contended that as e petitioners had purchased some land &om respondent no.1 for valuable consideration, the authorities are not justined in interfering with the possession in the garb of pendency of the ceiling proceedings. Admittedly, the said proceedings are pending against the respondent no. 1 and-the petitioners had purchased the [and without obtaining permission from the Competent Authority. Thus, many factual aspects are also involved in this case which in the opinion of this Court are to be adjudicated upon by the cominon law forum. The petition stands disposed of accordingéy.‘ Certihed copy as per rules. J Sd/- P.C~Naik J? Judge /