f} G ssngie IN THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARH ATBILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No;H 9 01 Of 2011 PETITIONER: .-<"L s^ ^y ^^ "' /"^' .•••''. ./••"' ^ Ramawatar Gupta, S/o Late Bhuwan lal Gupta, Aged about 51 years, Head Master, Posted at Govt. Advanced Primary School, Charpara Pandhi, Block Masturi, District Bilaspur, ^. VERSUS -'?' .' •'y .y' ^* RESPONDENTS: 1)' The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. ' Bhawan, raipur (C.G.). 2) The Director, Directorate of Public Instructions, Raipiir (C.G.) 3)''The Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4)--"The District Educafion. Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). 5)" The Block Education Officer, Block Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ .7 ..^-^^^ ^ ^IK^S^ ^ Gowri HIGHCOURTOF C H HATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.4901 OF 2011 PETITIONER Ramawatar Gupta Versus RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Shailendra Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 26th day of August, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge, the legality and. validity of the order dated 15-7-2011 (Annexure - P/1) passed by the respondent No.3 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Primary School, Charpara Pandhi Block Masturi to Primary School, Darsagar, Kupabandha. 3. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner has been transferred to Primary Schoot, Darsagar, Kupabandha. Learned counsel further submits that Darsagar & Kupabandha are two different places and the same also relate to two different Janpad Panchayats. 4. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing for the State very fairly submits that if there is any error in the impugned transfer order, necessary corrections will be made and the corrected order will be passed. He further submits that if the effect has not been given to the impugned transfer order, the same shall not be given effect to, till the fresh order is passed. 5. In view of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 6.- Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- SATBH K. ANGNMOM 1 Judge ?