IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3572 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 19.11.2009. Sushma Devi .....Petitioner versus Ajit Singh and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Ms.Monisha Lamba, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr.Suman Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.3. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved at the order dated 23.5.2009 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fatehabad, whereby a part of the amount of compensation awarded to her by the Tribunal, has been kept in FDRs for a period of three years and she has been permitted to withdraw the monthly interest on the amount so deposited, as against the encashment of the FDRs. The petitioner submits that she requires the entire amount for the repair and renovation of her house. It is stated during the course of hearing that more than two years and two months have already passed and C.R. No.3572 of 2009 (O&M) 2 only a few months are left in the maturity of the FDRs. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order. Considering all the attending circumstances, the revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh application before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fatehabad, alongwith some proof/certificate from the Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat etc. in support of her plea that her house requires immediate repair or renovations. If such an application is moved alongwith the satisfactory material to substantiate the plea, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fatehabad shall consider the same sympathetically and dispose of in accordance with law. Disposed of. Dasti. 19-11-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE