1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO. 1745 OF 2007 Ramnath S/o Yadavrao Pathade .... PETITIONER V E R S U S Namdeorao Sonerao Khedkar & Others. .... RESPONDENTS Mr. N.K.Kakade , Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. R.K.Ladda, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. ............................ CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE: 07/09/2010 ORAL ORDER : 1. The appellant assails the order of the 3rd Additional District Judge, Ahmednagar in Trust Application No. 1 of 1992, wherein the Additional District Judge, Ahmednagar rejected the application filed by the present appellant against the scheme framed U/s 50-A of the Bombay Public Trust Act. 2. Mr. Kakade, the learned counsel for the appellant contended that the appellant was the sole trustee and he was managing the Trust efficiently and properly and there was no need to frame the scheme for the said Trust. According to him, it is only the appellant, who is managing the said Trust. 2 The respondents are not interested in managing the affairs of the Trust and they are only interested in the property of the Trust. 3. The Courts below have considered the aspect that it would not be beneficial to keep the trust in the hands of one person. It is also found that the present appellant had obtained loan on the trust property. All the villagers are taking part and celebrating the religious festivals. The Assistant Charity Commissioner and the Additional District Judge had found that it would not be beneficial for one person to manage the whole Turst and as such it was observed by the Additional District Judge that framing of the scheme is in the interest of the Trust. 4. In the light of above, no substantial question of law arises. As such, the First Appeal is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 5. In view of dismissal of First Appeal, Civil Application does not survives and as such disposed off. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] knp/ FA 1745.2007