S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION (S) No. 1854 E'CD<^W ¥- Tej Ram Venna S/o Shri Kripa Ram Verma, aged about 27 years, resident ofVillage Padakidih, Block and Tahsil Simga, District Raipur (CG) VERSVS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, D.K.S. ihawan, Raipur (CG) 2. The Additioaal Collector, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur (CG) 3. The Sub Divisional Officer '^ J). 4. Gram Panchayat Padkidih, Block and Tahsil Simga, District Raipur (CG), through its Sarpanch, Ciram . Panchayat Padkidih, Block and Tahsil Simga, District Raipur (CG) 5. Secretary, Gram Panchayat Padkidih, Block and Tahsil Simga, District Raipur (CG). 6. Sewa Ram Dhruv S/o Anup Singh Dhruv, resident ofVillage Padkidih, yoclc and Tahsil Simga, District Raioyr rC.G.l) i^*j.l ^V-/..^-^;^; ' Smt. Renu Kochar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 to 3. (Passed on 29U1 ofMarch, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner questions the validity and legality of the resolution dated 16.01.2007 (Annexure P/l) whereunder, accordmg to the learned counsel, the respondent no. 6, Sewa Ram Dfaruv has been selected for appointment on the post of Panchayat Karmi in Gram Panchayat Padkidih, Block and Tahsil Simga, District Raipur, without formal appointment order to aive effect to the resolution. 2. The resolution can not be given effect to before passing the order of appointment in favour of any person. Accordingly, the resolution does not confer any right on the person who has been selected by the resolution before any final appointment order is passed. This Court, in the matter of Bhola Ram Verma Vs. State of PhlTitt-iscTarh *• Otllpra WP TsTrt 1777/7nft7 f1"p.ir!R/1 nn 7t Y./liIitXitij^tXiii i^r \^iii\^i3^ W .1 . A^^J. ^j /A/A/WJ* U^/^/IU^^* i^ll ^^ March, 2007 has held as under: "It is trite that the resolution or a decision in a meeting is not the order which can be given effect to. There should be a proper order pursuant to the resolution for appoiatment to the post ofPanchayat Karmi. The Panchavat & Rural Developmeat rd ^- Department, Govemment of Chhattisgarh, vide its circulsr I^o. c^^iir^ /u't{i. /^i-yij^]^ /'2QQS /23Q iqiicp 16.03.2006 has clarified that after resolution of Gram Panchayat and Gram Sabha to appoint Panchayat Kamii, the Sarpaach has to pass an appropriate appointment order for appointment ofPanchayat Karmi. It is further stated that in case ofremoval from the post ofPanchayat Kanni also, after resolution of Gram Sabha, the order of removal is to be passed by the Gram Panchayat. Thus, it is clear that no appointment can be given without issuing proper appointment order." 3. Thu.s, ihis petition is premature as no final order giving effect to the resolution has been passed. 4. This petition is accordingly dismissed, summarily.No order as to costs. 5. Consequently, I.A. No. 1, application for grant of interim relie^ stands disposed of. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aliut