IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 7540/2008 Decided on:2.12.2010 _____________________________________________ Jugendra Singh. …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and another. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that notification dated 7.7.2000, Annexure A-1, till date has not been implemented. This fact is not disputed by the learned Deputy Advocate General. 2. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to implement notification dated 7.7.2000 with all the consequential benefits, within a 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? no 2 period of two months, from the date of production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 2.12.2010 *awasthi*