THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P. No. 2217 of 2006 ORDER: Aggrieved against the order dated 30-01-2005 passed in IA No. 1731/05 in AS No.466/04 on the file of III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, the present civil revision petition was filed. The revision petitioner filed IA No.1731/2005 in AS No.466/2004 under Order 3 Rule 4 read with section 151 CPC to revoke the vakalat of Mr D Hanumantha Rao, Advocate and to permit him to engage a new counsel or A Krishna, Advocate. After contest, the said petition was dismissed by the court below. Therefore, questioning the said order, the present civil revision petition is filed. When the matter is called, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner Mr R Achuthanand represented that the order impugned herein itself has been worked out and a separate counsel was appointed for the present petitioner before the lower Appellate Court. He also represented that the Appeal Suit before the lower appellate Court was also with-drawn by the present petitioner, who is the appellant therein, and therefore no further orders need be passed in this matter. Recording the said submission, this civil revision petition is dismissed as has become infructuous. No costs. ____________ 23-3-2010 Kvrk THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No. 2217 of 2006 23-03-2010