75 Il Il 4 1 4e CWP NO13975 of2007 etc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISIONe2009 1CWP No13975 of2007 084M9 Gurdev Singh ePetitioner 0 VERSUS C Stateof Punjab Others e e e CWP No19283 of2006 08Ml C I UjagarSingh eeePetitioner Z VERSUS StateofPunjab 8 Others V 0 e e 1 3CWP No11213 of2004 08M9 e Darshan Kumar eeePetitioner C 1 t VERSUS a2 StateofPunjab r Others Z ee 1 4CWP N001870of200408LM1 Il Lakha Singh eeePetitioner 1 1 1 VERSUS 11 t Stateof Punjab Si Others C 5CWP No19279 of 2007 982M1 1 Harnek SingIO Others VERSUS Stateot Punjab 82Others ee 6eCWP N03208 of2009 gurdialSinghSi Others VERSUS Stateof Punjab 8 Others e e 44 Batra Amit 2014.03.05 15: 11 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 9 76 0 144 1 1 CWP NOe13975of2007 etce 2 1 CORAM HONBLE MRJUSTICE PERMOD KOHLJ 1 W PRESENT MrBR SharmaMrlS Shanna MrGS Bal V1CJindal Walia Advocates 1 P for thepetitioner t m r MrBChahal DAG Punjab 0 C PermodKohli Je 1 C5 1 Z Sinceall thesepetitionsinvolvecommon questlonsoflaw and facts 2 the same are disposedofbythis common order The petitionersare seekingthe retiral I pensiOIl 08 thepetitioners were working as with QO theStateGovernment on wage basis Theywere appointed v Z on various datesindicatedin the writ petitionsTheywere placedin regular pay scale theyhave more than 20 years of service as watchmenThe main gnevance of the petitioners is that 1 the petitioners are not being grantedthe pensionarybenefits whereas similariysituatedpersonshave beengrantedthe benefitson the C strength of vanous passedbythis Courtin the of Baldev cases Singhvse State of Punjab CWP decided Oll Rakha Singh vse State of Punjaband others CWP Noo778012004 decided on 2720059and DangalSingh Stateof Punjab VSe and OrSe CWP No15544 of 2007 decided on 17 1 Similar matters are pendingin this Court In some of such cases thc State Govemmenthad Batra Amit 2014.03.05 15: 11 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 77 0 1 1 CWP NO3975 of2007 etc 3 earlier released the pensionary pensionbut later withdrew the same In a similar matter 1 CWP No683 112009learned counsel for the State had producedon record Memo Noe7 dated 172009 whereby the StateGovemmenthastaken a decision to implement thejudgment ofthis Court inview ofdismissalofthe SLP filed bythe State Govemmentbefore the Honble Supreme Court The sum and substanceof 0 thisCircularis to the judgment of the court In this view of the 0 I matter the petitioners in all the aforesaidpetitionsare entitled to the C9 benefits on the same analogy as in cases referredto here above Z r Disposed of accordingly r 1 A copy ofthis order beplacedon record on eachconcernedOle I Olj IlO 1 PERMOD KOHL0 mv JUDGE Z 1 702009 Ll MFK Dff t 52 Pe 1771 7 5 v J Batra Amit 2014.03.05 15: 11 TRUE SCANNED COPY OF ORIGNAL PHHC CHANDIGARH JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document