IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.10801 of 2011 Date of Decision : June 03, 2011. Bachcha Lal Singh .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Gagneshwar Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner has been transferred from Ferozepur to Patiala vide order dated 29.3..2011 (Annexure P-1) which is being challenged on the ground that he has been transferred when less then 1½ year is left for his retirement, which is contrary to the guidelines issued by the State Government. I am of the considered view that the transfer is an incidence of service and the policy/guidelines relied upon by the petitioner do not confer any legal right, the violation of which may call for interference by a Writ Court. However, without interfering with the impugned order, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's request sympathetically and as per CWP No.10801 of 2011 [2] the Government Policy, within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Dasti. June 03, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE