:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 495 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 495 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 495 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 1313 OF 2005 APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 1313 OF 2005 APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 1313 OF 2005 Praful Vora ..Appellant versus Akashdeep Joshi & Ors . ..Respondents Mr. S. Wassooden for the Appellant. Mr. P. Sakseria i/b. M/s. Purohit & Co. for the Respondents. CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & S. J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. S. J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. S. J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 13TH APRIL, 2006 DATE : 13TH APRIL, 2006 DATE : 13TH APRIL, 2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : . Heard learned counsel for the Appellant and the Respondents. Perused the Affidavit in Support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence and want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Notice of Motion disposed of accordingly. (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ) :2: (S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.) (S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.) (S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.)