:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19Th DAY OF DECEMBER 2011 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. L. MANJUNATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJULU WRIT APPEAL No.642012011 1GM-PCI BETWEEN: SRIDAR NARAYAN PA’fl’AR AGE: 37 YRS, 0CC: BUSINESS. R/0. NILAGAG1 2. DR. SMTLEELA W/O. SRIDAR PA’fl’AR AGE: 42 YRS, 0CC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER, RIO. RAICHUR .APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SHIVASAI M PATIL, ADV.,) AND: I. NIL RESPONDENT THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED U/S.4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT. 1961. PRAYING TO: A. SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE LOWER COURT i.e. FAMILY COURT, BELGAUM IN M.C.NO.134/2010. 02/02/2011 WHICH IS MARKED AS ANNEXURE-D. B. SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P.NO.626 16/2011 ON 16/09/2011, ANN EN UP E E. C. ALLOW THE PETITION SILED BY THE \PPELLNTS HEREIN LNDER St C LION 13H) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT BE..FORE GE b MFI LOL RI BE I GA V 1 4 2010 \‘ HR H Is V P L L ANNENURE-A. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, K.L.MANJUNATH, J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The appellants herein being aggrieved by the dismissal of the divorce petition filed under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 in MC No. 134/2010, had filed the Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, without filing an appeal as required under the Family Courts Act. The swci \Vrjt Petition is dismissed, Against which the present appeal is filed. 2. Learned counsel for the apnellants submit that the appelia.r..ts may be permitted to wit.hdraw the appeal as well as the Writ Petition with liberty to tile Ni FA EanL siPs /pg uoTIdd ti us su psswsp [Bdd13 iJ J4J S! 1!1 4!PiOJ3V oLo/1roN )JAJ Ut psud pio jo ussiwsip qi