1 mp t IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1261 of 2009 Mohammed Ausaral Israil Haque .. Applicant versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ... Mr.Harshada Bhadbhade for the applicant. Mr.S.R. Shinde APP for the respondent. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 23rd April 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. Previous bail application filed by the applicant before this court bearing Criminal Application no.477 of 2008 was rejected by me by an order dated 12th March 2008. In my view, no change of circumstance has occurred for considering fresh bail. 2 3. Learned counsel for the applicant, however, invited my attention to the order passed by the Sessions Judge below Exhibit-9 in Sessions Case no.82 of 2007. He submitted that before the Sessions Court the prosecution contended that there were some typographical errors in the panchnama and sought to correct those mistakes by an amendment. That application was rejected by the Sessions Judge. He submitted that that errors in the panchnamma were not typographical errors but they show the weaknesses in the case of the prosecution and therefore the applicant is entitled to a bail. What were the mistakes in the panchnama and what were sought to be corrected is not stated in the present bail application. If according to the applicant the said errors show that prosecution case is so weak that applicant cannot be connected to the crime or would be entitled to a benefit of doubt it is open for him to apply to the Sessions Court for bail on that ground. If such an application is made the Sessions Court shall consider it on its own merits without being influenced by any of the observations made in this order. 4. In the circumstances, the bail application is rejected. 3 (D.G. KARNIK, J)