IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH MAY 2009 / 6TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 14434 of 2009(Y) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. M.P.PAUL, AGED 44, S/O.PAULOSE, MANJOORAN HOUSE, KUDAPUZHA, EAST CHALAKKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. SASIKALA, AGED 36, W/O PAUL, MANJOORAN HOUSE, KUDAPUZHA, EAST CHALAKKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.ABDUL RASHEED SRI.K.A.SHAMSUDEEN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PADINJARE CHALAKKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KIZHAKKE CHALAKKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY GP SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/05/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- W.P.(C).14434/2009 -------------------- Dated this the 27th day of May, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioners who claim to be in joint possession of 2 acres 12.25 cents of property in survey Nos.388, 389, 390/1, 390/4 of West Chalakkudy Village, sought for a permission from the competent authority under the Land Utilization Order for removing certain mud from the property to see that the same is used as a fish pond. Under Ext.P8, permission was granted by the RDO subject to three conditions which included a restriction on removing clay and mud from the property and taking it out of the property itself. Petitioner sought for variation of the conditions and the RDO called for a report from the Village Officer as evidenced by Ext.P10. Writ petition has been filed alleging delay in orders being passed on Ext.P9 whereby the petitioners have sought for variation of the conditions. 2. I heard learned Government Pleader also.In W.P.(C).14434/2009 2 the result, writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to pass orders on Ext.P9 in the light of Ext.P10, within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. While passing orders on Ext.P9, RDO shall also take into account the fact that the petitioners have been prevented from acting on Ext.P8 and suitably extend the validity of the permit. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs