i“§§@§“§ G§E§F§C§ OF GEE ”-52% SCAQE'é fl? E§LA§PUR m wmN EEN8¥§ QQRM‘E: Hgw’ELE SEQ ??&J§=§‘J @QP'Whu, 62¢ HGN EkE SH& Sgwéi. KJ‘MgxR $ENH£§§ w fw ri (mf‘fg £32m 2m§lf un“ .wina I ‘un g “ETEEgRE‘Q ‘E. Ravmch‘a ‘33s SK} late ‘K Ru, agad ahem 3! yeah. hldem‘m Mumvxyai Csrpomtio; Faiga m RIO Jute Mm, Lab V Unbn Stme’é, Pslgem Dmrict Mgam {11%.} 2 J§§ "fhefhwaf, 55/0 we §~§am “n Ti“x&f§“iwar aged abaut 38 ‘mwas Councgog of Mam M3. i0, Wut‘mipa! arparatmn, Rgigarh, R/s Theihwarpgra, Raigarh, Disirict — Raégarh, (CG) ‘gggsaég ’1. State of Ch‘nattiagarh, mmugh the Sacreiary, Eepavtmani cf Nagriv‘a M; av h} K‘? Bhawagy Mammiay, Ra pun Dash'wt Rakpur, (QG) 2. Tha CQEec‘tor, Raigarh, Disifict w Ra§garh, (0G,) 3‘ Mn cg§9g§ “arpma‘tmn, .nmumi C mrm$smnr=xr Mummpai umparsv‘mn, Kuigarh, Di m ~- Raigarh, (0(3) 4a Maiyaa Mmkfpa§ Cm?- Raigarh, D mat ~— Ra g3 h 5. Ta’ame'x‘ wing :meja, 850 K$har agh‘ Tmeja, aged abom 47 ism’ss Fiji) 529$ Cress Camplex, Raiggri ‘ ”Dismct -— Raigai'h. {$3.} N/ \73 Shr§ MK Ags‘awai, ieamsed Depuiy Advocaie Genera! fer respondents Na. 1' 8: 2. Shré HB. Agrawai, Earned Samar Ccumei mm Ms. Rmm Tamrakar, teamed counsei for re3p0ndants Ne. 3 & 4. None for rewonden’c N05 QRaER (23m Maw-y, 2M; Thea foEiswing mder of ”ma Ceur": wais paaxged by RasjQe$ £4mgzaié&g {LL laeamed counsg! far he pariées am beam. 2. ‘é'he peiiiianers have 'fiied aims wri": peiitien fix” the foibwing “333E Thai, this HGn’bQe Ccuri’ mew kindQy be pieased t0 issue a WE in $he naiure sf MANSAMU3 dkecied the Respandgnt M33 and 4 to immediatgly initiate ihe raceyery proceeding against me rewondeni NQ5 and recnvered the excegs amoum 0f Rs.46,‘40,2§8f— fmm the respcndent No.5. 10.2. Thai, the respandent HQ? mav 5333 be dimmed to‘take appmpriata acnan agaénet me mspendgnts N0. 3 and 4 regarding the €Xce$s payment r9 regpendem N05 in grace ef payment 6f R3.34,&D,0G0l- paid a Sum of RS.80;QQ,268/— Wiihaut sanctioned the payment of . e.8QQU,2€8/~. m3 Any other relief, which may be euiiabie in the fecis and circumeiances of the case, may aisa be grantee." ’¥ The petitioners are aiieging thai excess eaymeni wee made by reepenciente No. 3 8} 4 te respendent M15. é in the sounter affideiri’r filed on ‘eenaif 23f reeeonciente- i: 9‘ ques%§an$ 15mg, \‘90 §t £8 appagm éhat thg mafi’er ényolves diwuted‘ of fmt whEch cannat be resaived in the wyft pmeeeding$ under Art§cla 226 0f the Constitution of mdia. Tha wrii petiiion, wtherefere, is §iabie i0 be dismiSEed and £3 hweby dismissed with me fiberty t0 ihe pe%3%§onem i0 avaii i‘he other remed§e$ which may be avaimbig m ”mam”, undgr relayant garcvisafam af (aw. 5‘ x. Himmi rJ. ’a”. ‘ rg‘. Sd/- jfSunil Kumar Sinha r Judge