IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M NO.28030 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.10.2011 Satnarain and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present:- Mr.Jai Vir Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Manmohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. ---- Ajay Tewari, J.(Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.100 dated 22.04.2011 registered under Sections 452/307 IPC and 25/25 (54)/59 of Arms Act at Police Station Kanina, Mahendergarh. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that no attribution was made with regard to the petitioners in the FIR. However, on instructions from ASI Inder Rai Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General stated that the FIR was lodged by the daughter- in-law of the injured-Chandu Lal and when the injured regained consciousness in the hospital, he specifically, named the petitioners, Satnarain who had lifted the blanket from injured's mouth and Mahesh as as the person who was standing outside with running motor cycle so as to help the main assailant to escape. In view of these allegations, I find no reason to differ with the view taken by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Narnaul and consequently, dismissed this petition. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE 18.10.2011 sonika