IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.703 of 2010 YOGENDRA PRASAD SAH, S/O LATE RAWAT SAH, R/O VILLAGE-KARJAIN, P.O. & P.S.-KARJAIN, DISTRICT-SUPAUL. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.THE COLLECTOR CUM CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT ESTABLISHMENT (APPOINTMENT) COMMITTEE, SUPAUL. 3. COMMISSIONER,KOSHI DIVISION,SAHARSA. ----------- 2. 18.04.2011. Mr. Prabhu Narain Singh for the appellant, and Mr Amar Nath Deo, learned Standing Counsel 26, are present. The petitioner of C.W.J.C.No. 132 of 2004 has preferred this appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature at Patna, and raises a grievance with respect to the order dated 12.3.2010, whereby the writ petition has been dismissed. We have perused the materials on record and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. The concerned authorities had published a panel for appointment of daily wagers on 12.8.2000. The panel was modified on 12.8.2002, and the appellant found himself at serial no. 100. He did not get appointment leading to the writ petition. It appears that no person below the rank of the appellant in the merit list was appointed. 2 Thus no case of discrimination and arbitrariness is made out. Therefore, we are agree with the order of the learned Single judge. There is no merit in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed. (S.K.Katriar,J). Shashi (S.P.Singh,J).