IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.83 OF 2005 Sushma Suhas Badgujar. ...Applicant. Vs. Suhas Madhav Badgujar. ...Respondent. ..... Mr.Shekhaar Jagtap for the Applicant. Mr.S.D.Patil the the Respondent. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. December 20, 2005. P.C. : When this application came up for hearing before the Court, parties agreed to explore the possibility of a settlement by referring the matrimonial dispute between them to mediation. Accordingly, Mr.S.J.Railkar, Learned Advocate practicing before this Court was appointed as a mediator by consent. The Learned mediator has used his endeavours to ensure that the matter is settled and the Court has been informed that the parties have settled the dispute. Consent Terms signed by the parties and their respective Advocates are taken on record and marked "X". There shall be an order in terms thereof. Both parties are present before the Court. The Learned Advocates desire that the Court should record the agreement between the parties that while the applicant shall be entitled to the custody of a child, the Respondent would be given access on two alternate Saturdays during the course of every month with prior intimation to the Applicant from 9 a.m. till 6 p.m. The Respondent has agreed to take access in the Pimpri-Chinchwad area wherein the applicant resides and the child shall be picked up from the residence of the applicant and delivered back to her on the same day at the stipulated time. Parties have also agreed that a list of movables belonging to the applicant which has been tendered before the Court and marked "X-1" shall be returned by the Respondent to the Applicant within a period of two weeks from today. There shall be an order accordingly. Since the dispute between the parties is settled in these terms, the application is disposed of. In the event that any modification of the terms of access is necessitated, it would be open to the parties to apply before the competent Court. ......