THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.200 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION LODGING NO.1488 OFi 2006 PETITION LODGING NO.1488 OFi 2006 PETITION LODGING NO.1488 OFi 2006 Rev.Fe.joseph Pereira & Ors..Petitioners Vs. Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Ors..Respondents And Mauli Bandarpakhadi Griha Nirman Sanstha (Proposed) ...Applicants WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.201 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION LODGING NO.1488 OF 2006 PETITION LODGING NO.1488 OF 2006 PETITION LODGING NO.1488 OF 2006 Rev.Fe.joseph Pereira & Ors..Petitioners Vs. The Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Ors..Respondents And M/s.Universal Development Corporation ..Applicant Mr.L.M. Acharya, for the Petitioner Mr. R.M.Sawant, Govt. Pleader for Respondent Nos. 3 to 7. Mr. S.G. Surana, for Applicant. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE: 2nd August, 2006 P.C. . By these Chamber Summonses the Applicants seek to be added as Respondents to the Petition. Applicant in Chamber Summons No.200 of 2006 is the society which has been granted Annexure II. Applicant in Chamber Summons NO.201 of 2006 is the Developer appointed by the Applicant in Chamber Summons No.200 of 2006. Considering that, they will be vitally interested in the petition. In the light of that both the Chamber Summonses are allowed. The petitioners are directed to add the Applicants as respondents in the Writ Petition. 2. It is made clear that we have not dealt with the merits of the matter. That will be considered at the time of final hearing. . With the above observations both the Chamber Summonses disposed of. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J). J). J).