IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20333 of 1999 Between: 1 Pota Raju Ravi Kishore S/o. Krishna Mohan Rao R/o. Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2 K.Subba Rao S/o. Pothuraju R/o. Pinapadu, Tenali, Guntur 3 K.Ratnaraju S/o. Sunder Rao R/o. Vella Chintala Gudem, Gopalapuram, West Godavari District 4 Gandham Rambabu S/o. G.Subba Rao R/o. Kommugudem West Godavari District. 5 Manduri Gopala Rao S/o. Kasi Vishwanatham R/o. 18th Ward, Pathuru Tadepalligudam, W.G.District. 6 Y.Ramana S/o. Nagulappa Yeguru Kommarapalli Mandanapalli Chittoor District ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Zonal Manager, Indian Bank, Zonal Officer, Liberty Plaza Basheerbagh, Hyderabad 2 Regional Manager, Indian Bank, Regional Officer, Labbipet, Vijayawada, 3 Regional Manager, Indian Bank, Subbiramireddy Complex, Dhaba Gardens, Vishkhapatnam 4 Regional Manager, Indian Bank, Regional Officer, P.V.N.Complex, Seshapuram Street, Chittoor .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or writ particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ declaring (i) the action of the respondents in not regularising the services of the petitioners as illegal and arbitrary; (ii) direct the respondents to empanel the petitioner for the post of Sub-staﬀ; (iii) to consider the case of the petitioners for regularisation in the category of Sub-staﬀ in the respondent Bank in accordance with the rules and guidelines of the respondent- Bank. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.G.VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the respondents: MR. P. SURESH This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.20333 of 1999 ORDER: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-bank that the subject matter of this writ petition is covered to be disposed of in terms of the judgment of this Court, dated 16.02.1998, rendered in W.P.No.18998 of 1997 and batch. In view of the same, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment. Oﬃce to annex a copy of the judgment, dated 16.02.1998, in W.P.No.18998 of 1997 and batch, while dispatching the copy of this order. _________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY 27th August, 2008 IBL