BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Sixth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.12822 of 2011 1.KALARANI 2.CHELLAPANDI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE UTHAPPANAICKANUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT CR NO. NOT KNOWN/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. A. RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b) and 506(i) IPC and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) appearing for the State. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the de-facto complainant, no case has been registered against the petitioners, only petition enquiry is pending. 4.Considering the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. However, I am inclined to give a direction to the respondent not to harass the petitioners under the guise of petition enquiry. The respondent is directed to follow the dictum laid down in D.K.Basu Vs. Stat of West Bengal reported in AIR(1997) SC 610. 5.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. sd/- 26/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UTHAPPANAICKANUR POLICE STATION MADURAI DISTRICT 2.THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate SR.No.33159 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12822 of 2011 Date :26/09/2011 TR : 28.09.2011: 1P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/