1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6861 of 2011 Decided on: 23.8.2011 Sikander Singh ....Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General for respondent No. 1. Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is essentially aggrieved by Annexure P-10, the order of termination passed by the fifth respondent College. In the nature of the order, we propose to pass, it is not necessary for us to go into the merits of the case. The petitioner has statutory remedy before the Arbitration Tribunal. In the event of the petitioner approaching the Tribunal, the matter will be considered by the Tribunal expeditiously, and in any case, within the time fixed in the Ordinance. 2 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. A copy of this judgment, duly authenticated by the Court Master, be supplied to the parties. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. August 23, 2011 (Justice Surinder Singh), (cm/hl) Judge.