IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 20494 of 2008 Between: M.Jayanna S/o. Sundaram, E.No.250094 O/O The Depot Manager Secunderabad,R/o. Hyderabad ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Executive Director(Hyd Zone) A.P.S.R.T.C MGBS Hyderabad 2 The Deputy Chief Personal Manager A.P.S.R.T.C Hyderabad Zone 3 The Depot Manager A.P.S.R.T.C Picket Depot,Secunderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to call for the records from the Respondents herein connection with impugned proceedings No.E1/255(5)/07/HZ dt 18-7-2008 and issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the impugned proceedings No.E1/255(5)/07/HZ dt 18-07-2008 of the 2nd respondent herein can-celling transfer orders vide proceedings No.E1/255 (5)/07/HZ dt 28-9-2007 as arbitrary,illegal,unjust,contrary to law without application of mind and also in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently by setting aside the same direct the respondent herein to give eﬀect to transferred order in proceedings No.E1/255(5)/07/HZ dt 28-9-2007 transfering from 3rd respondent herein to zonal work shop Uppal transfer on request and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.SRIDHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: K.MADHAVA REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.20494 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled questioning the impugned proceedings dated 18.7.2008 issued by second respondent canceling the orders passed in proceedings dated 28.9.2007, as arbitrary and illegal. It appears, petitioner is working as Senior Assistant (Personnel) in APSRTC, Picket Depot, Secunderabad. While that being so, he was transferred to Zonal Work Shop at Uppal through proceedings dated 28.9.2007. Before the said proceedings could be given eﬀect to, petitioner was issued with a charge sheet and was also suspended from service. However, against the order of suspension, he ﬁled W.P.No.2004 of 2008 before this Court and this Court allowed the said writ petition by order dated 19.3.2008 setting aside the order of suspension. Thereafter, the impugned proceedings dated 18.7.2008 had been passed canceling the orders dated 28.9.2007 transferring the petitioner from Picket Depot, Secunderabad to Zonal Work Shop, Uppal. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is filed. The learned counsel appearing for respondents Mr.K.Madhav Reddy placed before the Court the letter dated 23.9.2008 purported to have been addressed to the Senior Law Oﬃcer, APSRTC, Bus Bhavan, Hyderabad and stated that though the orders dated 28.9.2007 are cancelled vide proceedings dated 18.7.2008, the case of the petitioner would be considered after conclusion of disciplinary proceedings initiated against him. In view of the same, the respondents are directed to pass appropriate orders as soon as disciplinary proceedings are concluded as to transferring the petitioner from Picket Depot, Secunderabad to Zonal Workshop at Uppal. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ____________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 26.9.2008 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.20494 of 2008 26.9.2008