IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5372 of 2010 AMIT KUMAR SAH, SON OF LATE AMLA SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BISHUNPURA P.O. SHEKHPURA P.,S. BASANTPUR DISTRICT SIWAN. Versus 1. GENERAL MANAGER UTTAR BIHAR KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK HEAD OFFICE, KALAMBAGH CHOCK, MUZAFFARPUR-840001. 2. THE CHAIRMAN UTTAR BIHAR KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK HEAD OFFICE, KALAMBAGH CHOCK, MUZAFFARPUR 3. THE GENERAL MANAGER (PERSONNEL) VAISHALI KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK H.O., KALAMBAGH CHOWK, MUZAFFARPUR 4. THE BRANCH MANAGER UTTAR BIHAR KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK H.O., KALAMBAGH, MUZAFFARPUR For the Petitioner : M/s Surendra Kishore Thakur, Ajay Kr. Sinha, Advocates. For the Bank : Mr. Prabhakar Jha, Advocate. ----------- 02. 02.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Uttar Bihar Regional Rural Bank(hereinafter referred to as the Bank). 2. Petitioner is the son of late Amla Sah, who was an employee of the Bank and while serving as such he left for heavenly abode on 23.1.2003, whereafter petitioner is said to have applied for compassionate appointment vide representation dated 28.1.2003 Annexure-2 series addressed to the Chairman of the Bank, Head Office, Muzaffarpur. He is also said to have filed another representation through his mother Subhawati Devi dated 18.10.2006, Annexure-4 as reminder to the Bank to consider his case for compassionate appointment but when the two representation were not considered, this writ application has been filed on 29.3.2010. 3. Counsel for the Bank has opposed the prayer. He states that on the date of death of the father of the petitioner the Bank was not in existence, as such, the representation dated 28.1.2003, - 2 - 18.10.2006, Annexures-2 series and 4 could not have been filed and the writ application annexing the copy of those representation have been filed only to mislead this Court. 4. Without going into the question whether the petitioner is attempting to mislead this Court I dispose of the writ application with direction to the Bank to consider the two representation dated 28.1.2003 and 18.10.2003 Annexures-2 series and 4 in accordance with law, as early as possible, in any case within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. It is made clear that direction to dispose of the representation has been issued without considering the case of the petitioner on merit. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)