^ ^I s^^ ( 0Z^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) W.P.fSl No.....t^.../2009 PETITIONER: / Smt. Saroj Dewangan Aged about 33 Years W/o Shri Thaneshwar Prasad Dewangan R/o Ward No.8, Dewangan Mohalla Champa, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: ...J' /1 A^. ^s/ y .^ ^- /l. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Panchayat and Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2. Collector Janjgir-Champa(C.G) ^ 3.. Chief Executive Officer Zila- Panchayat, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) /4. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Bamdihdih^ District- Janjgir-Champa / 5. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Sakti, District- Janjgir-Champa ® 6. Chief Municipality Officer Nagar Palika, Champa District- Janjgir-Champa 7. General Administration Committee Janpad Panchayat, Bamnihdih, District- Janjgir- Champa -f- PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS: H IGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BiLASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl No. 719 OF 2009 Petitioner Respondents Versus Smt. Saroj Dewangan State of Chhattisgarh & Others Present:- Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State/ respondents No.1 & 2. Shri Vinay Harit, Senior Advocate with Shri S.K. Mishra, Advocate for the respondent No.4. Shrl Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate for the respondent No.5 & 6. WRIT PETITION (S) No. 505 OF 2009 Petitioner Respondents Versus Smt. Satyabhama Jaiswal State of Chhattisgarh & Others Present:- Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate for the petjtioner. Shri Sushi! Dubey, Government Advocate for the State/ respondents No.1 & 2. Shri Vinay Harit, Senior Advocate with Shri S.K. Mjshra, Advocate for the respondent No.4. Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate for the respondent No.6. WRIT PETITION (Sl No. 508 OF 2009 Petitipner Respondents Versus Smt. Vimla Lahre State of Chhattisgarh & Others Present:- Shri Mateen Sjddiqui, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State/ respondents No.1 & 2. Shri Vinay Harit, Senior Advocate with Shri S.K. Mishra, Advocate for the respondent No.4. Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate for the respondent No.5 & 6. \6 WRIT PETITION (Sl No. 717 OF 2009 Petitioner Respondents Versus Smt. Mithlesh Pandey State of Chhattisgarh & Others Present:- Shri Mateen Siddiquj, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sushil Dubey, Government Advocate for the State/ respondents No.1 & 2. Shri Vinay Harit, Senior Advocate with Shri S.K. Mishra, Advocate for the respondent No.4. Shri Akhiiesh Kumar, Advocate for the respondent No.5. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) ORDER (ORAU (Passed on 25th day ofJanuary, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not want to press this petition on merit. However, the petitioners may be granted liberty to make representation to the competent authority, raising their grievances, to consider their cases, in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side have no objection. 3. Accordingly, the writ petit'ions are disposed of. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to flte a representation before the competent authority, raising their grievances, which may be considered by the respondent authorities, in accordance with law. 4. Further., if representations are pending consideration with regard to payment of saiary, the same shall be considered, in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. In view of foregoing, the petitions stand disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ashok