IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31183 of 2010 RADHE @ RADHESHYAM MANDAL @ RADHE MANDAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Informant’s Bolero was hired by one Ajay Yadav. Thereafter that disappeared. It is suspected that both driver and Khalasi were killed and Bolero was stolen. Admittedly none is named but petitioner’s name appeared in the statement of two of the witnesses that they remained in night in a house and holding the Bolero in morning left for some destination. Those witnesses three in number are examined under section 164 Cr.P.C. betraying from their statement even expressing their ignorance about persons named by them under section 161 Cr.P.C. goes to show that the Police later favoured accused persons and they were tampering by this petitioner and others named by them otherwise there was no occasion for getting their evidence recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioner is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)