BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. TAMILVANAN CRL OP(MD) No.14447 of 2011 1 CHELLADURAI, 2 V.C.M.MANIMARAN, 3 SATHESHKUMAR 4 CHINNAMANI, 5 SUBRAMANI, 6 PERIYASAMY, 7 SELVAM, 8 THIRUMOORTHY, 9 MAHARAJAN, 10 BALAMURUGAN, 11 DHANAPAL, 12 VASAGAM, 13 MANIMARAN, 14 LEEMA, 15 MEENA, 16 NAGALAKSHMI 17 CHITTUPILLAI, ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 9, 11 TO 13, 15 TO 19 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VILAMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. IN CR.NO.177/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.SURESH KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDI, Addl.Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused as well as the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent. 2.The petitioners, who are arrayed as an accused facing charges for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 448, 427, 294(b), 324, 336, 354, 506(ii) and 379(N.P) I.P.C. in Crime No.177 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police, have come forward with this application, seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the accused persons trespassed into the de-facto complainant's house and attacked the de-facto complainant, as a result of which, a case has been registered against them and hence, he prays for anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Public Prosecutor (criminal side) appearing for the respondent submits that he has not disputed the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners. He further submits that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioners and I find it just and reasonable to grant anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakkottai, Dindigul District and each of them executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners No.1 to 13 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders and the petitioners No.14 to 17 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. Sd/- 08/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NILAKKOTTAI 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VILAMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. R.SURESH KUMAR Advocate SR.No.38358 ssk/11.11.2011 /5c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14447 of 2011 Date :08/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/