IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14718 of 2008 Between: Gundumogula Govinda Appa rao @ chinna S/o Late Burayya Vallurupalli, Pentapadu Mandal, West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, West Godavari District, Eluru 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Eluru Division, West Godavari District Eluru., 3 The Tahsasildar, Pentapadu mandal, Pentapadu, West Godavari District Eluru 4 The Grampanchayath, rep by its Sarpanch, Vallurupalli panchayath, Vallurupalli Village, Pentapadu mandal, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents No. 1 to 3 in issuing the enjoyment certificates to the Vallurupalli Villagers from the poramboku Lands adjacent to the water tank inthe village without following the required procedure under the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 is arbitrary, illegal and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents No. 1 to 3 to cancel the said issuance of the enjoyment certificates to the beneficiaries of the Vallurupalli Village and pass such othr order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.KODANDARAMA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.M.PRABHAKAR RAO The Court made the following : ] ORDER: (Per Anil R. Dave, CJ) This is a public interest litigation wherein it has been alleged that some persons are likely to be granted enjoyment certificates in respect of the Poramboke land adjacent to water tank. The petitioner, in fact, has not impleaded the persons in respect of whom the enjoyment certificates are to be granted, in this petition. In the circumstances, for want of proper parties, the petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition along with relevant material. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 10th July, 2008. __________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J GRR