IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 30TH MARCH 2010 / 9TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 7150 of 2010(P) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.THULASEEDHARAN, HEAD VEHICLE SUPERVISOR,KSRTC., KATTAKKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.ANILKUMAR SMT.A.ARSHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REP.BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC, THIRUVANATHAPURAM AND OTHERS. 2. DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, K.S.R.T.C.,KATTAKKADA,THRIVANDRUM., 3. KERALA TRANSPORT WORKERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED.T-133,THAMPANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN,SC KSTW CO.OP SOCIET FOR R3 SC SRI.NANDAGOPALA NAMBIAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).7150/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 30th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court complaining that although he has discharged his entire liability due to the 3rd respondent Society, attachment over his salary is still continuing. From the counter affidavit filed by the 3rd respondent it would appear that their total liability has been discharged and an amount of Rs.4,642/- paid in excess has since been refunded to the petitioner. It is therefore submitted by the Society that the petitioner has no outstanding liability to be discharged to the Society. 2. The other surviving grievance which the petitioner has, is that although the KSRTC made recovery in time, there was delay in remitting the recovered amount to the Society as a result of which the petitioner had to pay excess amount to the Society. This averment has been dealt with in paragraph 3 of the counter affidavit filed by the 3rd respondent where it is stated that the W.P.(C).7150/10 2 KSRTC's default is not at all reflected in interest account of the petitioner since KSRTC was regular in the remittance of the recovered instalments in the subsequent months. Recording the submission thus made by the 3rd respondent in the counter affidavit, the writ petition is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs