W Steel Authorlty of Indla Llmlte ‘Bhllai 5teel Plant Bhllal, Dlstrlct Durg, k represented by Executive Dri‘ectar (Flnance) IN THE HmH Baum OF JUQICATURE AT BILAspuH h).P.N0. \5 g af 2001‘ $etitioner ~Versus - Additiunal "Cammissioner, Cammarcial Tax, Raipur. Assistant Ccmmissioner , Carnmarcial Tax g Burg. Appellate Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxg Durg. 3tate 0f ChhattlSgarh (as Sucgassor of‘ State of‘ Madhya Pradesh) through Secretary Vanija Kar Vibhag, Raipur RespondentS. URIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 UF TH E CDNSTITU TIDN UF INDIA. 7 d XLHC-ll 37:1 :‘IRUW, ‘¥§?i W i ha H‘E Wm wv:.e:.&9...2$.$.%s)&ooo mm m zoo W z mm i _ mmfiw;m Wiw‘im WWW aiamané‘a 01.01.2004 Shri Ashish Shrivastm‘ra with Miss. Rupal Singh, counsel for thc pcu'tioncr. Shri Gautam Bhaduri, Deputy Advocate General far the State. This order shall alsqy dispcse of W.P.No.2521/2000, 153/2001, 155/2001 and 156/2001, as tha matter is identical. Petitioners have med these writ petitions against the order dated 08.3.2001 pass ‘ by the Additional Commissioner in Revision challenging the levy of entry tax @ 10% on Slow Silica Lime Stones and Hi 1 Silica Lime stones and other questions upheld in t revision by the Additional Commissioner. It is submi ed that on representations made by the petitioners, the Sta Government has agreed to settle l the dispute outside the co and on such settlement it was decided to reduce the rate o entry tax from 10%to 6% subject to the condition that petitio ers Withdraw the ‘ 3t petitions. Accordingly, learned c unsel for the petitioners want to withdraw these writ petitio s and pray that the matter be remitted back to the Additional Commissioner for reconsideration of other isues. The applications for the 1 purpose have also been filed “L; MS W31 {lite W h ‘ u XI-HC— 22 snrl Bhadurl, learned Deputy Advocate General submits that if the settlement has been arrived at there is no objection to the prayer made by the petitioners regarding withdrawal. y In view of the above, the matter is remitted back to the Additional Commissioner for reconsideration of other issues. If i isuch a. settlement is arrived at between the parties, the ¥Additionnl Commissioner shall proceed with the matter and , pass the order after hearing he petitioners in accordance with ‘law. The petitioners are allowed to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh in case ‘ y cause of action still survives. Accordingly these writ titions are disposed of. A photocopy of this o er be placed in W.P.No. 153/2001, W. P. 155/2001 and W.P.15 /2001. C.C. as per rules. Fakhruddin Judge J k wt .vr ‘\ {We W