1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Civil Review (s) No. 46, 48, 50, 51 & 56 of 2007 Decided on: 26th March, 2008 1. Civil Review No. 46 of 2007 Union of India vs Het Ram and another 2. Civil Review No. 48 of 2007 Union of India vs Roop Lal 3. Civil Review No. 50 of 2007 Union of India vs Geeta Ram and another 4. Civil Review No. 51 of 2007 Union of India vs. Mehar Chand 5. Civil Review No. 56 of 2007 Union of India vs. Dhanpat Nehartoo and others Coram: The Hon’ble Mr Justice Deepak Gupta, J. The Hon’ble Mr Justice Surinder Singh,J. Whether approved for reporting ?1No. For the Petitioner: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Asstt. Solicitor General of India. For the Respondent: 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? Yes. 2 Deepak Gupta,J. (Oral) CMPs M) No.687,689,692,688 and 1043 of 2007 Keeping in view the averments, made in the application(s), the same are allowed and the delay in filing the review petition(s) is condoned. The applications are disposed of. Civil Review(s) No.46, 48, 50, 51 and 56 of 2007. By means of these review petitions the petitioner-Union of India has sought review of the judgment dated 11th April, 2007, delivered by this court in CWP No. 572 of 2000. The main ground for seeking review of the judgment is that despite due diligence, letter dated 15th July, 1987 could not be brought to the notice of this court. According to the review petitioner, in terms of the said letter Extra Departmental Employees (EDAs) were not entitled to any increment prior to 1996 and therefore they are not entitled to the increment on account of sterilization. This letter was neither placed before the learned Central Administrative Tribunal nor before us. No reasons have been given as to why this letter was not produced, except making bald statement that despite due diligence it could not be produced. The learned Central Administrative Tribunal had decided the matter against Union of India. It was the Union of India, which had 3 approached us that writ of certiorari be issued to quash the order of the learned Central Administrative Tribunal. Neither before the learned Central Administrative Tribunal nor before us the aforesaid letter was placed. There is no error apparent on the face of the record, hence the review petitions are dismissed. CMPs No.702, 701, 700, 698 and 709 of 2007 No order in view of the dismissal of the main review petitions. The applications are disposed of. (Deepak Gupta),J. March 26, 2008 (Surinder Singh),J. (D)