IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH JANUARY 2009 / 8TH MAGHA 1930 RP.No. 49 of 2009 ------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.829/2005 Dated 17/10/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------------------------------- FR. LUKOSE, KUNNATHOOR, THE MANAGER M.A.M. HJIGH SCHOOL, KORATTY, PIN 680 308, THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN SRI.MATHEW B. KURIAN SRI.K.T.THOMAS RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT & RESPONDENTS 2-4: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A.I. JOSE, SON OF ITTICHAN,H.S.A. (RETD) ARAKKALAN HOUSE, MAMBRA, KARUKUTTY P.O., ERNAKULAM DIST. PIN 683 576. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, IRINJALAKUDA. 3. THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVT. GENERAL EDUCATION DEPT., GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 BY ADV.SRI.K.A.SHAMSUDEEN R2 TO R4 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/01/2009 ALONG WITH R.P.NO.119 OF 2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.Koshy, Ag.C.J. & K.P.Balachandran, J. ------------------------------------------ R.P.Nos. 49 and 119 of 2009 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 28th day of January, 2009 ORDER J.B.Koshy, Ag.C.J. Both the review petitions arise from a common judgment. The review petitions are filed stating that there was apparent error in the judgment. All the contentions raised by the review petitioner were considered. We see no apparent error in the judgment. Review petitioner was not able to point out any apparent or patent error in the judgment. It is also submitted that the cost imposed is very high. Only Rs.10000/- was ordered as cost. A retired teacher in 2002 had to approach several times before this Court for getting justice. It is true that the Manager was made as respondent only in W.A.No.829 of 2005. We have ordered cost on the respondent Manager in a common judgment after exhaustively hearing his counsel. We are of the view that no grounds are made out for reviewing the judgment. Review petitions are dismissed. J.B.Koshy (Ag. Chief Justice) K.P.Balachandran (Judge) vns