THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.7992 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioner claims to be the owner of premises bearing Nos.21-2-443 and 21-2-444 of Gulzar House, Hyderabad. His grievance is that the respondents have demarcated part of the area for the purpose of widening the road. The petitioner complains that no proceedings were initiated either under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’) or the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and that attempts are being made to takeover the property without paying the compensation. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent. The premises owned by the petitioner abut a road, which is identified for widening. He is under the impression that the respondents have not initiated any proceedings under the relevant provisions of law for acquiring the affected property. The learned Standing Counsel has placed before this Court, copies of notifications published under Sections 4(1) and 6 of the Act on 02.09.2008 and 22.09.2008 respectively. Eleven items were proposed for acquisition and the property owned by the petitioner is shown at item No.9. The petitioner has to put forward his objections in the said proceedings. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to participate in the proceedings initiated under the Act vis-à-vis the property and pursue his remedies. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:29.12.2009 kdl