1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 151 OF 2007 NANOO PREMCHANDARAN .. PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. RESPONDENTS Mr. V. S. Rajguru for petitioner Mr. A. S. Pai,APP CORAM:-SMT. RANJANA DESAI & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED:-20/2/2007 P.C. . Mr. S. B. Deshmukh, PI, Powai Police Station is present in the court. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn our attention to medical papers from Dr. L. H. Hiranandani Hospital dated 28/4/05. The papers disclose that the petitioner was treated in Dr. L. H. Hiranandani Hospital on 28/4/05. There was a contuse lacerated wound. Suturing was done. The medical papers state ’2 sutures’ taken. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner was hit by 6th respondent with a cricket 2 bat and the petitioner’s son was given a blow with a bat on the forehead. It was pointed out to us that the bleeding injury on the forehead is mentioned in the medical papers. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that despite this, Powai Police Station has not registered F.I.R. though the petitioner had on the day of assault approached the police station. 4. The learned APP states that in connection with this incident N.C. complaint is registered. However, since the medical papers were not produced no offence was registered. On instructions from Mr. S. B. Deshmukh, PI she states that the police will register an offence. 5. In view of this statement it is not necessary to entertain this petition. The petition is disposed of. 6. We, however, make it clear that on the merits of the case, we have not expressed any opinion. JUDGE. JUDGE.