IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 1506 of 2008 DATE OF DECISION: November 6, 2008 Piyush …Petitioner Versus Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd. …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. In the instant petition the petitioner has prayed that direction be issued to the respondent to issue him allotment letter with regard to plot applied by his mother. The respondent is a private construction company and the case was adjourned directing the petitioner to point out as to how the writ petition was maintainable against a private company. The petitioner has time and again sought adjournments. This is fifth request for adjournment by stating that talks of compromise are in progress. If that be so then there is no reason to keep this petition pending, especially when notice of motion C.W.P. No. 1506 of 2008 has not been issued. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition as pre- mature at this stage. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file a fresh petition or to avail any other remedy in accordance with law, if such a necessity arise at a later stage. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JORA SINGH) November 6, 2008 JUDGE Pkapoor 2