IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL. A.O. No. 338/2007 Smt. Bhagwati Devi … Appellant. Versus United India Insurance Company and others .. Respondents. Mr. S.K. Chaudhary, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Prabhat Pandey, learned counsel for the United India Ins. Co./respondent No.1. WITH A.O. No. 447/2007 United India Insurance Company ….. Appellant. Versus Smt. Mamta and others ….. Respondents. Mr. Prabhat Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned counsel for claimant/respondents. WITH A.O. No. 492/2007 Smt. Mamta and another … Appellants. Versus United India Insurance Company and others .. Respondents. Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. Prabhat Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No.1. ULok Adalat:Dated: 8-11-2008 UHon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J.U The matters were put up before the Lok Adalat. The claimants as well as the United India Insurance Company have settled the claim before the Lok Adalat as per compromise deed, attached with the order. According to the compromise deed the United India Insurance Company has agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 3,67,000/- along with interest @ 7% per annum from the date of petition, instead of the award amount, in the settlement of claim of the claimants. The amount already paid shall be adjusted. The claimants have accepted the aforesaid amount. -2- Therefore, the appeals are disposed of in terms of compromise attached with this order. The compromise deed shall form part of the decree. The amount of compensation (including the statutory amount), if any, deposited before this Court, shall be remitted to the Tribunal concerned. Let a copy of this order be placed in the files of A.O. No. 447/2007 and A.O. No. 492/2007. (B.C. Kandpal, J.) ISB