THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 5214 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order-dated 22.9.2008 passed in E.P.No. 17 of 2008 in OS.No. 85 of 2002 on the file of Senior Civil Jduge at Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. Petitioner herein is the judgment debtor, who suffered money decree on the basis of a promissory note. That order has become final and to recover and realise the amount, decree holder-respondent herein filed EP No. 17 of 2008 contending that the judgment debtor has sufficient means but he is avoiding to pay the decreetal amount. That EP was allowed directing the Judgment Debtor to pay Execution Petition amount of Rs. 2,07,466/- by 14.11.2008, failing which, to arrest him and send him to the civil prison for realization of the amount, according to law. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the Court below has committed an error as in a money decree instead of granting some instalments to pay the amount, it has straight away directed the judgment debtor to pay the amount of Rs. 2,07,466/- by 14.11.2008 failing which, to arrest him and send him to civil prison, which is unwarranted and it affects the personal liberty of a citizen under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondent contended that though on 23.10.2009 this Court granted time to deposit half of the decreetal amount, the petitioner has not complied with the said order till today therefore, the trial court rightly directed to arrest him and send him to civil prison. Heard the learned counsel appearing for both sides and also perused the entire material made available on record. Taking into account the gravity of the situation, the petitioner is directed to clear off the entire decreetal amount within a period of four months from today, failing which the order passed by the trial court dated 22.9.2008 shall automatically stand operative. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J DATE: 24.09.2010 KA