- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO.92 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO.92 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO.92 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant vs. Mohd. Shakil Sagir Khan and others ...Respondents Mr.U.V.Nikam,A.P.P. for the Applicant CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 19,2006. : OCTOBER 19,2006. : OCTOBER 19,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned A.P.P. for the Applicant-State. The challenge in this Application is to the order dated 30th December 2003 by which the learned Magistrate granted bail in favour of the Respondents. 2. After having heard the learned A.P.P., I find that there is no merit in the Application. The Respondents are arrested on 29th November 2003 in connection with the offences registered against them under section 498-A, 406 and 376 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Magistrate has observed in the order that the entire investigation appears to have been completed. After considering the material collected during the investigation, the learned Magistrate has passed the order granting bail. The said order is operating for last two years and ten months. There is no allegation that the Respondents have committed breach of conditions imposed by the impugned order. 3. Application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE