IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6326 of 2010. Decided on: October 7, 2010. Harveena Devi ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P & ors. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Neeraj K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K.Bawa, AG, with Mr. R.M. Bisht, Dy. AG, for respondents No. 1 to 3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved since his appointment as P.E.T. made by the PTA has been terminated on account of posting of the 4th respondent. It is submitted that the 4th respondent is a para teacher. It is also submitted that there are other vacant posts available to accommodate the 4th respondent, whereas the petitioner cannot be accommodated anywhere else since he is PTA appointed Physical Education Teacher. 2. Therefore, there will be a direction to the second respondent to examine the matter and in case there are vacant posts available to accommodate the 4th respondent, the petitioner shall not be disturbed. The necessary orders in this regard shall be passed within a week from the receipt of the copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition before the second respondent. However, it is clarified that such continuance of the petitioner, if required and in the event of any vacancy available, shall be permitted only in case the petitioner fulfills the required qualification. 2 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice October 7, 2010. ( Justice Rajiv Sharma ), (karan) Judge.