IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21441 of 2010 PAPPU SAO & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.07.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 419 and 379 of the I.P.C. In view of the fact that vide order dated 03.02.2010, the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1, Barh, observed that the grounds taken by the petitioners are good grounds for grant of regular bail. Hence, directed the petitioners to surrender within four weeks and the learned court below was directed to dispose off the bail application of the petitioners at earliest without being prejudiced by the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1,Barh. Thereafter, the petitioners filed another Misc. Petition No. 01 of 2010, Barh, to extend the date of surrender since petitioners were suffering from some ailment. 2 Vide order dated 22.05.2010, the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1,Barh, rejected the prayer of the petitioners. Without expressing any opinion of the merits of the case, let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioners in view of the observations made by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1,Barh, vide order dated 03.02.2010 if the petitioners surrender within six weeks from today, the learned court below may consider to dispose off the regular bail application on the same day. With this observation, the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners is disposed off. Let the order be transmitted through Fax to the learned court below at the cost of the petitioners. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)