IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 12076 of 2008. Decided on: 3rd June, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Prem Lal. …Petitioner. -Versus- Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): It is not disputed that the present lis is covered by the instructions issued by the respondent-Corporation dated 03.02.2009 and the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP(T) No. 2882 of 2008, titled Darshan Singh Versus H.R.T.C.. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner strictly in view of instructions and the judgment cited hereinabove, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge June 03, 2011. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. - 2 - - 3 - `