IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH JANUARY 2010 / 7TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 1429 of 2010(C) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- K.VIJAYAKUMAR, THANIMA, MANIKKAPURAM, PUTHUKULANGARA, NEDUMANGAD. BY ADV. SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN SMT.MINI GANGADHARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, OFFICE OF THE TECHNICAL EDUCATION, PADMAVILASOM ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. S.AJAYAKUMAR, PRINCIPAL, COLLEGE OF FINE ARTS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.1429/2010-C ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 27th day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner herein is a member of the Parents- Teachers Association of the College of Fine Arts, Thiruvananthapuram. Ext.P1 is the true copy of the bye-law of the P.T.A. 2. Aggrieved by certain alleged illegal actions by the second respondent-Principal, the petitioner raised objections in the P.T.A meeting. He also filed a representation as per Ext.P3 before the Director of Technical Education. Petitioner seeks for a direction to the Director of Technical Education to conduct due enquiry in regard to the allegations made in Ext.P3. 3. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submitted that the first respondent-Director of Technical Education is already seized of the matter and a proper enquiry will be conducted in regard to the allegations made in Ext.P3. 4. Therefore, there will be a direction to the first respondent to conduct the enquiry with notice to all interested parties including the petitioner and the second respondent and complete the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. W.P.(C). No.1429/2010 -:2:- The petitioner will produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of the Judgment before the first respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms