IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3203 OF 2004 Dilip Ramchandra Suryavanshi ..Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ---- Mr.A.K.Prajapati for the applicant. Mrs.P.H.Kantharia, Addl.Public Prosecutor for the Respondent/State. ---- Coram : R.M.LODHA & R.S.MOHITE,JJ Date : 11.02.2005. PC . The applicant has been convicted of the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay vide Judgment dated 11.03.2004. Aggrieved thereby, the applicant has preferred appeal. However, the said appeal suffers from delay and therefore, by this application the applicant prays that delay in filing the appeal be condoned. 2. For the reasons stated in paragraph-8 of the application, we are satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause in filing the appeal in time. 3. As a matter of fact, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has no objection if the application is granted. 4. Consequently, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 5. Criminal Application stands disposed of. (R.M.LODHA,J) (R.S.MOHITE,J) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.912 OF 2004 Dilip Ramchandra Suryavanshi ..Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ---- Mr.A.K.Prajapati for the applicant. Mrs.P.H.Kantharia, Addl.Public Prosecutor for the Respondent/State. ---- Coram : R.M.LODHA & R.S.MOHITE,JJ Date : 11.02.2005. PC . By a separate order passed by us today in Criminal Application No.3203/2004, we have condoned the delay in filing the Appeal. 2. Appeal is admitted. 3. Reminder be sent to the concerned Court for transmitting Record & proceedings. (R.M.LODHA,J) (R.S.MOHITE,J)