FAO No.3369 of 2001 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.3369 of 2001 Date of Decision. 29.09.2010 National Insurance Company Ltd., Faridabad having its Regional Office in SCO No.337-40, Sector 35, Chandigarh through its duly constituted attorney ......Appellant Versus Shreya @ Sareeya minor daughter of Shri Surender Kumar Yadav and others ......Respondents 2. FAO No.3370 of 2001 National Insurance Company Ltd., Faridabad having its Regional Office in SCO No.337-40, Sector 35, Chandigarh through its duly constituted attorney ......Appellant Versus Smt. Anita Yadav w/o Surender Kumar Yadav and others ......Respondents 3. FAO No.3371 of 2001 National Insurance Company Ltd., Faridabad having its Regional Office in SCO No.337-40, Sector 35, Chandigarh through its duly constituted attorney ......Appellant Versus Surender Kumar Yadav (S.K. Yadav) s/o Shri Roshan Lal Yadav and others ......Respondents Present: Mr. Neeraj Khanna, Advocate for Mr. Ravinder Arora, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondents. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- FAO No.3369 of 2001 -2- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is by the insurance company on the issue of negligence and quantum. There had been no permission taken under Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The appeal is not maintainable in terms of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Nicolletta Rohtagi and others 2002 ACJ 1950. The point has also been specifically addressed by a Division Bench of this Court in National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Balbir Kaur and others 2000 AIR (Pb) 210. 2. The appeals are not maintainable and they are are dismissed accordingly. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 29, 2010 Pankaj*