IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 496 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 496 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 496 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2135 OF 2006 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2135 OF 2006 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2135 OF 2006 Ajay Suresh Mohite ...Applicant Ajay Suresh Mohite ...Applicant Ajay Suresh Mohite ...Applicant Vs. Vs. Vs. The Stateof Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents The Stateof Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents The Stateof Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.N.N.Gawankar, Advocate for Applicant Mr.N.N.Gawankar, Advocate for Applicant Mr.N.N.Gawankar, Advocate for Applicant Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, A.P.P for Respondents Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, A.P.P for Respondents Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, A.P.P for Respondents CORAM: SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE & CORAM: SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE & CORAM: SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE & SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATE : 15TH DECEMBER, 2006. DATE : 15TH DECEMBER, 2006. DATE : 15TH DECEMBER, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an application for modification of the 1. This is an application for modification of the 1. This is an application for modification of the condition imposed by the Deputy Inspector General of condition imposed by the Deputy Inspector General of condition imposed by the Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Central Region,Harsul, Aurangabad. As per our Prisons, Central Region,Harsul, Aurangabad. As per our Prisons, Central Region,Harsul, Aurangabad. As per our order dated 22nd November, 2006 we had ordered that the order dated 22nd November, 2006 we had ordered that the order dated 22nd November, 2006 we had ordered that the Petitioner be released on furlough on usual terms and Petitioner be released on furlough on usual terms and Petitioner be released on furlough on usual terms and conditions and the surety of Mr.Mahendra Jamuna Prasad conditions and the surety of Mr.Mahendra Jamuna Prasad conditions and the surety of Mr.Mahendra Jamuna Prasad should be accepted. However, in the release order the should be accepted. However, in the release order the should be accepted. However, in the release order the Petitioner had to furnish a Bond of Rs.50,000/- for which Petitioner had to furnish a Bond of Rs.50,000/- for which Petitioner had to furnish a Bond of Rs.50,000/- for which has no objection, but he has objection about the condition has no objection, but he has objection about the condition has no objection, but he has objection about the condition as to furnishing Bond of Rs.1,00,000/-. We do not find as as to furnishing Bond of Rs.1,00,000/-. We do not find as as to furnishing Bond of Rs.1,00,000/-. We do not find as to why such amount is fixed, we therefore, reduce the to why such amount is fixed, we therefore, reduce the to why such amount is fixed, we therefore, reduce the amount to Rs.15000/-. amount to Rs.15000/-. amount to Rs.15000/-. 2. The Application stand disposed of accordingly. 2. The Application stand disposed of accordingly. 2. The Application stand disposed of accordingly. 3. All parties to act on the copy of this order. 3. All parties to act on the copy of this order. 3. All parties to act on the copy of this order. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (SHRI D.G. DESHPANDE, J.)