IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15780 of 2008 1. MD.YUSUF, SON OF LATE MD. MOOSA 2. MD. SADIQUE 3. MD. SHAHID 4. MD. CHAND 5. MD. TARA, 2 TO 5 ARE SONS OF MD. YUSUF ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HASANPUR OSTI, P.S. MAHUA, DISTRICT VAISHALI 6. MD. SHAKIL, SON OF MD. TAYYAB 7. MD. TAYYAB, SON OF NOT KNOWN BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RASOOLPUR, TURKI, P.S. BHAGWANPUR, DISTRICT VAISHALI. --- PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. TASNEEM BANO, WIFE OF MD. MANSOOR AHMAD, MOHALLA NEW COLONY, P.S. DIGHA, DISTRICT PATNA. --- OPPOSITE PARTIES ----------- 2 31.3.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the parties are closely related to each other and the dispute has arisen due to misunderstanding and land dispute. The allegations of theft are ornamental in nature and unbelievable. All these aspects will be considered at the time of framing of charge or at the appropriate stage in this case. This application is dismissed with the aforesaid observation. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)