IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1231 of 2010 M/S K.K. PRINTING WORKS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR with MJC No.1232 of 2010 M/S NISHA PRAKASHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR with MJC No.1233 of 2010 SANJAY KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR with MJC No.1234 of 2010 M/S PATIL BROTHERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR with MJC No.1235 of 2010 M/S SOMAR PRAKASHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR with MJC No.1236 of 2010 M/S NORTH EAST PUBLICATION Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR with MJC No.1237 of 2010 M/S DEVENDRA PRAKASHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3 28-07-2010 M.J.C. No. 1231 of 2010, 1232 of 2010, 1233 of 2010, 1234 of 2010, 1235 of 2010, 1236 of 2010 and 2 1237 of 2010 taken up together. Issues are common. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he had been given 90% of the payment. Counsel for the State submits that 10% of the payment had been deducted on account of low quality supply. Having heard the counsel for the parties, this Court observes that if the petitioner has any grievance, he may represent to the authority concerned. These contempt applications are dismissed with aforesaid observation. S.P. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)