L i BFVOQE THE HON'QLE 3TATE ADI‘JINIS’I%ATIVT" TRIBUN§I §£NCH RRI kUD ‘ Fm Fewsilai}, i ' O.A .No. I 20 1 I‘a‘.’_ r .J wiJ ”Wm 7nbunal. i Q§;V$)Egw @} : RAt UP AP§L1CANTS : 1. Krishna Kumar Vérma,aged 40 years, 3/0 shri Manrakhanlal, Asstt. Teacher, F3dd1e $chocl BANBARAD 2. Dhaniram Sinha, aged 41 years, s/o Rameshwar Erasad ginha, Asstt.‘T%acher, Frimary Schoal MIR MUNDA . 3. Bhuneshwarlal Kbsre, aged 38 years, 3/0 Kartik Ram Kosre, A5$tt.Teacher, PRIMARY SCHCCL AHERI’. Sewak Ram Janghel, aged 37 years, 5/¢ Mangloo Ram Janghel Asstt Teacher, “PR IMARY SCHOOL BANE AR: D Jageshwar Frasad Khutail,aged 38 yeays, S/o Hemrai Khutail, Asstt. Teacher, RIMARY SCHOGL PAHANDA. RAJENDRA KUMAR kasE, Aged 33 ears, 3/0_Khedu Ram Rose, Asstt. Teacher, ' PRIMARY SCHOOL, JARWAI. J1wan lal Thakur. aged 40 years, S/o umed 3ingh Thékur, ASStt, Teacher, ~PRIMARY SCHQQL, DADAR. COntd . . .2 / , y § NON—APE. IC ANTS: 3mt. Chandra Kumar Dewanqan,aged 45 year$, D/O Shri R&m'Dewanqan, Asstt.Teacher HQIMARY SCHQCL AHI WARA Surendra Kumar 5harma, aged 39 years, 5/0 Late Gajadhar ?rasad, Asstt‘Teacherl MIDIL E SCHOCL MEDESARA . 10. Baldev Frasad Verma,aged 44 years, 5/0 Rupoo Ram Verma, Asstt. Teacher MIDDLE SCHOOL AHIWAIQA. Agahan Das Jangde,aged 39 yéarS, 5/0 NainSingh Jangde, Asstt.Teacher PRIMARY SCHDOL D0oMAR . Devendra Kumar Dhruwe, aged 39 years, §/Q H.L. Dhruwe, &s$tt. Teacher, PRIMARY SCHOCL BIR EBHAT . VER SUS . 1. state Govt.9f Chhattisgarh Through the $ecretary, SSchool Education Department, Secretariate (Old D.K. Hospital); Raipur. Commissi6ngr, schocl Education Department. State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur. DiStrict Education Officar. Burg. contd...3 Q; APPLICATION U/S 19 OF THE ADMINI$TRATIVB TRIBUNAL ACT 1985 7T+ AO mmmw‘a SB: Eon’ble $hri Maninéra Mohan Shrivastava, J. £8.32010 Shzi V.KV Chakravarty, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitionem. Shri Chandresh Stata/ raspondents. warned ccunsel for the pvti’rioners submits that the ptti‘gioners fixed pay-scala on probation Afier tha petitiongrs wart: grantéd reguiar pay-scale. Leanled comma}. furthér submits that the iSsus involwd 'm ifionerS are entitléd to regular pay— scale with eifect from the d ie of mitial appointment or after compietion of probation period“ The issue involved liere 1 was considered by {he Madhya Praciesh State Ariministrafive Tri unal, Jabalpur (for short ‘the SAT”) iii 0.4%,. No. 2745!89 gMadhu Lawyer for The Shriv astava, Panel were. appointed initialiy on a completion of probation period, the case is as to whether the Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of s held that the similarly situateo. pay—scaie wef the date of initiai erl up to the Sopreme Court. The appeal was dismisseci by the Su reme Court, upholding the decision of the SAT to the eii‘ect that the Te chers/ Assistant Teachers are entitled i to regular pay-scale from date o initial appointment. k M.P. & others}, wherein it teachers are emitleri to regu appointment. The matter was t a l " ’Z/ W?W 1°€Q°rm $Wm 4 In View of the above subm:.ssions, the writ petition is disposed of in tbs Same tsrms i.e., the peti ioners are granted h'berty to make a reprasentation, if so advised, to considér their case on its own merit 311d in its perspective. If the p 'oners stand on the same footings as per order passed by the SAT in Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequently confirmed by the S preme Court in Special leave Petition {Civil} No.6892/93 by order da ed 3.1.1994, the petitioners may be entitled to same relief accordingi . Sinha e ' V