IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11484 of 2011 MD. NAUSAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the Complainant. Petitioner is husband of the complainant and admittedly, marriage of the petitioner had taken place in the year 1999 and the complaint case was filed in the year 2009. Between the aforesaid period, the complainant gave birth to two children. Although a stand has been taken on behalf of the petitioner that he has already divorced the complainant but the learned counsels appearing for the parties submit that a chance of reconciliation may be taken. In the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner, namely, Md Nausad is directed to be released on provisional bail for a period of three months in connection with Complaint Case No. 1160 C of 2009 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria. The Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria shall issue notice to the complainant as well as petitioner fixing a date for reconciliation after release of the petitioner from the judicial custody and furthermore, the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria shall take all possible steps to resolve the dispute of the parties and if he succeeds in his attempt, the provisional bail granted by this court - 2 - would be confirmed by the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria itself and if he fails in his attempt on account of rigid approach of the petitioner, the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria shall not extend the period of provisional bail granted by this court. It is needless to say that if reconciliation is failed on account of rigid approach of the complainant, the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria shall confirm the provisional bail granted by this court. Shahid ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)