IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.404 of 2008 RAM BABOO RAI Versus REKHA DEVI ----------- 2 15.09.2008 After some arguments, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Counsel for the petitioner, however, has pointed out that when the divorce case was filed by the petitioner in the year, 2007, the petitioner could not have been subjected to an order for payment for maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act from the year, 2002 because at best, the such order can be passed from the date of institution of the case and not before that. Counsel infact seems to be correct that the date 21.5.2002 in the impugned order appears to be typographical error in as much as the divorce case itself is of the year, 2007 in which the wife, opposite party had filed an application claiming maintenance on 21st of May, 2007 under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act only 21.05.2007. That being so, the Court below is directed to correct that part of the typographical error. With the aforementioned observation and direction this application stands dismissed as withdrawn. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)