IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 30004 of 2010(A) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- VIGNESEHAN D, AGED 26 S/O.M.DEVADAS NAYAK, R/AT GUDDEKERI, HOSEBETTU VILLAGE, MANJESHWAR, KASARAGOD. BY ADV. SMT.R.PADMAKUMARI RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. MANJESHWAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH REP BY ITS SECRETARY, P.O.MANJERSHWAR, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 2. M.SOMASHEKHARA, S/O.LATE NARAYANA, RESIDING AT NEAR SUB REGISTRAR'S OFFICE P.O.MANJERSHWAR,MANJERSHWAR, KASARAGOD PIN 671 323. R1 BY ADV. SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ WP(C).No. 30004/2010(A) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 14/07/2009 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT BY THE FATHER OF THE PETITIONER. P2: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 31/10/2009 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT BY THE FATHER OF THE PETITONER. P3: COPY OF THE REMINDER LETTER DATED 23/12/2009. P4: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT DATED 05/05/2010. P5: COPY OF THE INFORMATION OBTAINED TO THE PETITIONER DATED 03/06/2010. P6: COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 19/06/2010. P7: COPY OF THE REPLY NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 10/07/2010. P8: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 13/09/2010. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE svs/ T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 30004 of 2010-A - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of November, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioner seeks for a direction to the first respondent Panchayat to take a decision on Ext.P8 complaint submitted as early as o n 13.9.2010. The objection raised by the petitioner is with regard to the construction of a building by the second respondent in R.S. No.34/14 of Hosabettu Village which lies north of the petitioner's property. 2. Even though notice has been served in the writ petition, the respondents have not filed any counter affidavit. Ext.P8 is admittedly pending. 3. Therefore, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders Ext.P8 with notice to the petitioner and the second respondent, and after hearing them, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/