HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1900 of 2011 ORDER: Aggrieved by the order, dated 11.04.2011, passed by the Judge, Additional Family Court, Hyderabad, in I.A.No.668 of 2010 in O.P.No.1164 of 2009, whereunder and whereby the petitioner herein was directed to deposit a sum of Rs.9,000/- per month towards the maintenance of the second respondent, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. The facts of the case necessary for disposal of the Civil Revision Petition may be stated as hereunder: - The petitioner herein and the first respondent are the husband and wife. The second respondent is their daughter. As some disputes arose between them, the said O.P. was filed by the first petitioner herein seeking to dissolve their marriage. Pending consideration of the same, the respondents herein filed the said I.A., praying the Court to direct the first petitioner herein to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month to each of the respondents 1 and 2 herein towards maintenance. The Court below, having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, declined to grant maintenance to the wife-first respondent herein and granted a sum of Rs.9,000/- per month to the second respondent herein. Challenging the same, the husband approached this Court and filed the present Civil Revision Petition. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the relevant records. The petitioner is the husband of the first respondent and father of the second respondent. Admittedly, the second petitioner is a minor and is pursuing her studies. In which case, it is the bounden duty of the petitioner, being the father of the second respondent, to maintain her and bear her medical, educational and other expenses. It is the case of the respondents herein that the petitioner herein owns immovable properties and gets substantial income from it, apart from getting the income by running Cable T.V. Connections. The Court below appreciated the facts and circumstances of the case rightly and directed the petitioner herein to pay maintenance to the second respondent here, who is his daughter. In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order under revision, which is well-reasoned one. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________________ JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED​ 17th July 2011 DR