1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. C.A. No. 200/2010 in CAZ No. 762/2009 in LPA St. No. 17432/2009 in WRIT PETITION NO. 3103/2009 (D) ( The Model Mills, Nagpur and another .vs. Shri Raja Ram Madankar) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Ms. Seema D. Shirnath, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. S.A. Kalbande, Advocate for Respondent. .......... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & P.D. KODE, JJ. DATED : APRIL 29, 2010 Heard. Initially the statement was made on behalf of the appellants that the amount has been deposited. When it was pointed out that the said amount as stated has not been deposited, the learned counsel for the appellants stated that earlier statement which was recorded by the Court on 11.1.2010 was with reference to amount directed to be deposited by the Supreme Court. Hence the statement was overlooked and the appellants were given time of four weeks from 25.3.2010 to deposit the amount. Even though time of four weeks has expired on or before 22.4.2010, the learned counsel for the respondent points out that the amount has not been deposited yet. The learned counsel for the appellants states 2 that the amount of cheque has been drawn but the same is at Hinganghat. We find it difficult to accept the explanation given by the appellants. This is a clear case of non-compliance of the statement made to the Court. Hence the interim stay is vacated. JUDGE JUDGE halwai