IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17292 of 2010 1. KUNDAN KUMAR S/O LATE JAI PRAKASH MANDAL R/O VILL.- SIMARIA RUCHDEO, P.S.- FALKA, DISTT.- KATIHAR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT (PRIMARY EDUCATION) GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, KATIHAR 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, KATIHAR 5. THE DISTRICT TEACHERS APPOINTMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KATIHAR 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BLOCK FALKA, DISTT.- KATIHAR 7. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ SHABDA BLOCK AND P.S.- FALKA, DISTT.- KATIHAR 8. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ SHABDA, UNDER BLOCK AND P.S.- FALKA, DISTT.- KATIHAR ----------- 02. 12.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Annexure-7 is under challenge, which is order dated 13.7.2010 passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Katihar. Petitioner is aggrieved because his claim for appointment as Shiksha Mitra has been dismissed by the appellate authority both on the ground that post does not exist after 2006 as well as the appellate authority did not find any merit in the allegations made. Irrespective of the findings the fact stands that in absence of the post in question after 1.7.2006, no direction for appointment even otherwise can be given in favour of the petitioner. 2 Writ has no merit as the order does not suffer from any infirmity. It is dismissed. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)