(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. Criminal Revision Application No. 175 of 2010 Rajaram s/o. Karbhari Malode, Age : 28 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Lamangaon, .. Applicant Taluka : Khultabad, (Original District : Aurangabad. respondent) versus Sow. Savita w/o. Rajaram Malode, Age : 24 years, Occupation : Household, R/o. C/o. Ramrao Malhari Gaikwad, .. Respondent 1-16-465, Dhimbar Galli, (Original Begumpura, Aurangabad. petitioner) .......................... Mr. Rahul Joshi, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Bhushan B. Kulkarni, Advocate, for the respondent. .......................... CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATE : 7TH SEPTEMBER 2010 (2) COURT'S ORDER : 1. The learned Advocate appearing for the revision applicant states that his client is now posted at Ranchi, which is a peace zone. He further states that his client is ready and willing to take the respondent / wife at Ranchi for cohabitation. 2. This, certainly, is a welcome change in the fact situation of the case. In view of this changed circumstance, the applicant has ample opportunity to get the impugned order suitably varied. This revision application, therefore, does not survive. 3. The revision application is, therefore, dismissed with liberty to the revision applicant to move an application under Section 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. ( A.V. NIRGUDE ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/kra175