IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45732 of 2009 ADHIK SAH @ ANIL SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.1.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that parties are neighbours having land dispute and act alleged does not constitute an offence under sections 376/511 IPC which also is on co-accused Shyam Sah and rest of allegations are not justifying refusal of anticipatory bail. In view of facts and circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in Saharsa Sadar P. S. Case No. 538/2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)