r— HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DB: Hon'ble Shri Sunil Kumar Sinha & Hon'ble Shri Radhe Shvam Sharma. JJ. WritADpealNo.405/2011 AppeSSant Petitloner Vs. Smt. Rakmani Devi Divakar, W/o. Shri Kartik Ram Divakar, aged about 37 years, R/o. Village Kumhari, Block Lohara, District Kabirdham (CG) Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Collector, District Kabirdham 2. Block Education Officer Biock Lohara, District Kabirdham (CG) 3. Sarpanch Village Panchayat Bachedi, Block Lohara Distt. l^birdham (CG) Present: Mr. Ram Kumar Tiwari, counsel for the appeilant. Mr. Ajit Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondents 1 & 2, on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (15.09.2011.) Heard on t.A. No.1, an application for condonation ofdelay in filing the writ appeal. 2. On due consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the grounds taken in the application, we are satisfied that the appellant has shown sufficient cause for not filing the appeal in time and the delay in filing the appeal deserves to be condoned. 3. The application is allowed and the delay in filing the writ appeal is hereby condoned. ^K^ ^ W.A. No.405/2011 4. Also heard on admission. 5. The appellant/petitioner has filed this appeal against the order dated 19th March, 2010 passed inW.P.(S) No.3980/2007 by learned Single Judge of this Court. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant/petitioner mainly on the ground that only on the basis of recommendation of Gram Panchayat on its resolutipn dated 23.1.99, the appellant/petitioner does not acquire any indefeasible right to be appointed on the post of Anudeshika. The learned Single Judge also observed in para 3 of the order that reason for not giving the appointment was that the appellant/petitioner was not residing regulariy in village Kohari and she was living with her husband, who was posted as Assistant Teacher far away from the territorial limit of Gram Panchayat, Bachedi. Even other wise, the resolution of the Gram Panchayat was passed in the year 1999. 6. In view of all these, we find no illegality in the order passed by the learned Single Judge. The writ appeal is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- R.S. Sharma Judge Bini