IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11387 of 2011 Sheo Bachan Singh, Son of Late Barelal Chaudhary, Resident of Mohalla Mahabir Asthan Kuraich, Ward No.6, At, Post Office & Police Station Sasaram, District Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Principal Secretary-Cum- Commissioner to Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director in Chief, Health Services, Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua. 4. The Civil Surgeon-Cum-C.M.O., Kaimur at Bhabhua. 5. The Additional Chief Medical Officer, Kaimur at Bhabhua. 6. The Medical Officer-In-Charge, Primary Health Centre, Kudara, at, Post Office and Police Station Kudara, District Rohtas. 7. The Post Master General, Bihar, Patna. 8. The Sub Post Master, Police Station Kudara Sakari (Kudara), District Rohtas. 9. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondents. ----------- 2. 18.7.2011. Heard Shri Diwakar Prasad Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Pankaj Kumar Singh, learned A.C. to A.A.G.13, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 8 and Shri L.P.K. Rajgrihar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.9/Accountant General. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 28.2.2008 as Pharmacist from Primary Health Centre, Kudara, District Kaimur, has prayed for directing the respondents to revise his pension in view of Government Resolution No.S-F-27/PKO- 2 137/2008, 819 dated 23.9.2009 with effect from 1.1.2006. The petitioner has further prayed for interest on arrear of difference of pension after revision. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents, on the plea of non availability of Service Book, are delaying the matter and petitioner has been deprived to get benefit of revision of his pension. On instruction learned counsel for the State informs the court that respondent no.6/Medical Officer-In-Charge, Primary Health Centre, Kudara has assured that within four weeks a duplicate Service Book will be prepared and thereafter, revision of pension in the light of Government Resolution shall be done. In view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, there is no need to further keep the matter pending. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent nos.4 and 6 to take all steps for issuance of sanction order after revising pension of the petitioner in the light of Government Resolution No.819 dated 3 23.9.2009 with effect from 1.1.2006 and also issue sanction order for arrear of difference of pension. Sanction orders are required to be issued within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Court expects that after receipt of the sanction order from the State authority, the Accountant General/respondent no.9 shall issue authorization within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of sanction order from the State authority. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)