StNSI.E BENCH INTHEHIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR W. P. (SINo. o OF 2010. PETITIONER .&^^^^ ^^s^s^-9""9 Gautam Chand Sahu, S/o. Shri Ram Lal Sahu, aged about 51 years, Occupation Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Sakra, District Dhamtari (C. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS r. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through :'The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G. ^;: ^^w!^. I^JY .»^ 3. BlockEducation Officer, Nagn, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) Trtfl^Uyy fWeev •— 4. ^Treasury Accoiint and pension Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari (C. G.: WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CPNSTITUTION QF INDIA The petitioner begs to submit as under:- 1 PARTICULARSOFTHEPEmTIONER: As giveh in the above cause title. •fif, PETITIONER HlGi-1 GOURTOFCHHAmSGARH : BILASPUR WRrr pETmoN(S)N^ SautamGhandSahu RESPONDENTS Vereus iStat&GOvt.ofChhattisgarh & Others ^rtPeBiGfflyndeFArticle226oftheC6ns ytionoftWia) ;Single Bench: Hon'bte Shri Satish K, /^nihotri, J. Present ^ ShriSomkantVenna.Adyoeateforthepe'titipners. ShriP.K.Bha(luri,PanelLawyerfortheStat8. Gowri OF(OER(ORAU : • . :: :: ': :'' :.: " .:- :• 1 (Pa^ed^onthis;)681d:ay;of tay, 2010) 1) By this peffion, the petitioner seete a directjon to the responderiis to pay two advanee increments^ ^ examination,onhisownexpenses,befbreenteiingintpservice. 2) l^arned counsel appearing fer the petitjoner sutimils that the i^ue involved in the present case fe noilonger resmf^fa ^the samei has been considered and decidetf by the Supreme Court in AstiaSaxena v. StateofM.P.&Ors.1/^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ' : ': ' , • 3) Leanwd counsel further submits that^^^ instant petition is sqyaraly ooveriad t>y Ihe decisions (supra). Thus, the petifoner may be permjtted to make a represientation to decide his case in Uw light 6f aforestated decisions,subjecfloverific;ationofthefacts. 4) Learned eoynsel appearing for 1h& State siibmte that in the event, the petitioner makes a repr^entation, the same wiil be coriadered and decicied) in aumrdance.v^h lawand in thelight (rf the.decislon of the Supreme Court in A$fta Saxena (supr^, vfithm a period of^^a^ from <he date of receipt ofthe repriesentetioh. 5) ln view of forggoing, acCOrding'tp the tearned counsef appeanng fbrthe petitt0ner,noithing^survive&inthispetitionforacijudteation. 6) AccoFdingly,thewrit petttion isdispdsed of. Sat^5£ ).-2009(tii),MFyR.(SC)59 1