IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33186 of 2010 RAJ KUMAR MEHTAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 02.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is husband of the informant and his marriage has taken place in the year, 2004 but subsequently, he used to torture the informant and solemnized the second marriage with another girl. Though the stand of petitioner is that he wants to keep the informant with full honour and dignity but it appears to me that after solemnization of the second marriage, there is no chance of reconciliation. But in spite of that, I am directing the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura to take up the matter of reconciliation and if the informant expresses her wishes to lead her conjugal life with petitioner, in that event, the petitioner (Raj Kumar Mehtar) shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 38 of 2010 to the satisfaction of court below (Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura) u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court below within 30 days from the date 2 of receipt of the order before the concerned court, the learned court below shall enlarge him on provisional bail in the manner as stated above for the period of two months and also issue notices to the informant fixing a date for reconciliation and if proceeding of reconciliation is not concluded in positive manner, then the learned court below shall stop the proceeding of the reconciliation and remand the petitioner in the instant case. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)