IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 16140 of 2009 Date of Decision: 22.10.2009. Anil Kumar --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Ram Pal Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) The petitioner is aggrieved of the communication dated 27.8.2009, whereby it has been communicated that on re-checking it has been found that all the answers of the petitioner have been found duly marked and the total marks are also correct. It has been further communicated that there is no mistake. The only ground on which the petitioner has filed this petition for again re-checking is that earlier petitioner had secured 80% marks and now he has been awarded less marks. This cannot be a ground for re-checking again and again. The request of the petitioner for re-checking has already been accepted and the outcome communicated to the petitioner. In the above circumstances, second re-checking is not permissible. Otherwise also, there is no allegation of malafide against any particular person or authority. In this view of the matter, I feel there is no scope for interference. Petition dismissed. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 22.10.2009 lucky