mi.^^ \ G^/ €TO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH <^ WRIT PETITION ( <^NO. £^OF2007 PETITIONER: ^ .^""""" cy° ^ \' ^' .^5 ^^ RE^ONDENTS : Suresh Dagla, S/o Shankar Lal Dagla, Aged about 34 years, R/o Priyadarshini Nagar, Bilaspur (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 2. Collector, Bilaspur (CG). 3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Kota, District Bilaspur (CG). Al^-I 4. Sarvan Gond, S^ Pumsottam, R/o I'^^^W^f" Uslapur, Sakri, Sub Division Kota, District Bilaspur (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA d XI-HC-78 ^-a=| +11*1^1 ffl*ll<»l ;3sn3TRw, STft^m^, ^rrey ;..w..^..^:.t{)^ 2007 3^l^l Ma<h (^sli^c<<^T) W^T^Tf^tW T rWW^Tsti^ich A ^cTTW^N^n^T 22.01.2007 Shri B.D.Guru, counsel for Shri Vinay Harit, Dy. A.G, f<j Heard. This petition is directed before the Sub Divisional Officer fche respondent under Section Revenue Code. It is contended tha| Scheduled Tribe and therefore n4 of the Code could be initiated agai| WT^rf ^* tel<ft ^T^K ^3Tf^T3:n^T ihe petitioner. :>r the State. against the proceedings pending •fr^spondents. PIowever; applicatio^ (Revenue), Kota at the instance of 170-A of the Chhattisgarh Land [fc the petitioner is also a member of proceedings under Section 170-A ast him and learned Sub Divisional Officer could not have taken co^nizaiice on the application of the \\ of the petitioner of Annexure P-6 was not considered and the petitijoner has been directed to file reply to the original application preferr^d by the respondent. I have heard counsel for th I have perused the applia Section 170-A of the Code prefer of the - allegations .macle in the petitioner to contest the claiin oi raising the obnections which he h| there is no jurisdictional erroj] Divisional Officer which calls f(| ^ petitioner. |ttion a.nd the order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer. The tribLin|al has r'egistered proceedings under ['ed by. the respondent on the basis [said application. It is open to the |the claimant before the tribunal by |is raised in the present petition and committed by the learned Sub )r interference in the instant writ petition under Article 227 of t3^j.e Constitution of India, With the aforesaid observatk^n, the petitioi|i is disposed of. ; ' Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.