In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M- 30449 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: October 05, 2011 Sunil Mittal ---Petitioner versus Sate of Haryana ---Respondent Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH *** Present: Mr.Neeraj Gaur, Advocate, for the petitioner *** Gurdev Singh, J. It is the submission of the counsel for the petitioner himself that the offence for which the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail, is bailable. Therefore, this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not maintainable and is dismissed as such. (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE October 05, 2011 PARAMJIT