IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 761 OF 2011 M/S. SUDARSHAN DRY DOCKS THROUGH MR. RUDRESH NAIK., ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. V. R. Tamba, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. P. Talaulikar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE & U. V. BAKRE, JJ. Date:- 15th December, 2011 P.C.:- Heard Mr. Tamba, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kantak, learned Advocate General for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has been issued show cause notices dated 9th July, 2010 and 5th August, 2011 by respondent No.2. According to Mr. Tamba, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner has replied to the said show cause notices. The same are not on record. However, this position has not been disputed on behalf of the respondents. 3. The grievance made by the petitioner in the petition is that inspite of showing cause to both the said notices, no decision has yet been taken by the respondent No.2. 4. In view of the above, we direct respondent No.2 to take appropriate decision in respect of the two show cause notices dated 9th July, 2010 and 5th August, 2011, after considering the replies filed by the petitioner and convey the decision thereon to the petitioner within a period of 8 weeks from today. 5. Mr. Tamba states that a personal hearing be given to the petitioner before taking any decision on the said show cause notices, to which the learned Advocate General has no objection. Accordingly, respondent No.2 to give personal hearing to the petitioner in respect of the two show cause notices. The writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. A. P. LAVANDE, J. U. V. BAKRE, J. ssm.