H«3HGOURTOFCHHATTISGARHATB!LASFt)R WritPsti{!onifSVNo.S57of2008 Petittoner Smt. Amrika @ Ambika Bai Markam D/o Late Bagauram Jagat, aged about 52 years, Superintendent, Kanya Ashram Pali,PosfPali,Distt.Kort»aC.Gj Versus Respondents 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Dlrector, Publte InsEruetion Deparbnent, Raipur (C.G.) 3. DisfaictEducationQfficer,KQrha(C.G^ 4; Block EducaSon OfRcer, Pali, DisU. Korba(C.S.) 5. Assistaht Commissioner, Tribal Welfare DeRarttnentDistiict-Korba(G.G.) WRiTPETITOIN UNDERARTICLE2260F THE CONSTn'UTIONORiNDIA Singls Bench : Hon'bfeMr. Satish K. Agnihotn, J. Shri K. S, Pawar, Advocate for the petiiioner, Shri A. S. Kachwaha, Deputy Advocate Gsnera! for the respondsnte. Tftal(i.irl 3. ^fr 4. ORALORDER (Passed on Ihis 1 day of February, 2008) Ths petitioner was appoinfed initially, on a fixed pay of Rs. 100/-. The pefitioner wras ffiereafEer, granted reguiar pay ?eale on comptetion of the probation period. ' The question of law involved herein is, asto whether the petitioner is entifled to reguiar pay scaie w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from thedateofcomptetionofprobationperiod. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, as well as teamec) counss! appearing for Ihe respondents/State, jointly submit that {he faets and question of law, invoived in the present writ petition, are the same asto 8iatGftnW.P. )No.597e/2a»(SUshi!T!wari&others^.StateGcsrt. of Chhattisgarh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11 .2006. tn view of Hie above-stated submissions made by learned counssl appearingfortheparfies.ttewritpeWonisalkwedinthesametermSi.e. peUtioner is entitled for regular p^ scale w.e.f. the date ^yi|H||a| appointment, subject to verificatton of the facte. N6 order asto GOSteSiSllI Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge