IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2407 of 2010 Between: M/s.Anand Agros Limited, rep. by its Managing Director Suri Babu ... PETITIONER/JUDGMENT DEBTOR A N D M/s.Amutha Traders, rep. by its Proprietor R. Amutha ... RESPONDENT/DECREE HOLDER ORDER: This revision has been directed against the order dated 10-03-2010 passed in E.P.No.24 of 2008 in O.S.No.101 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Bhongiri, whereby and whereunder the learned Senior Civil Judge advanced E.P.No.24 of 2008 and ordered for attachment of movable properties of judgment debtor. 2. Notice before admission came to be ordered on 27-07-2010. Despite notice being served on the respondent, none appears on its behalf. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner- judgment debtor and perused the material brought on record. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed E.A.No.27 of 2010 under Section 22 (1) of the Sick Industrial Companies Act seeking stay of all further proceedings and despite the pendency of the said application, the Executing Court without putting on notice to the petitioner-judgment debtor who had already entered appearance, advanced E.P. from 19-03-2010 to 10-03-2010 and proceeded to issue fresh attachment order under Order 21 Rule 43 of the Code of Civil Procedure and therefore, the order impugned in the revision is liable to be set aside. 5. Learned counsel also placed on record the copy of E.A.No.27 of 2010 filed by the petitioner-judgment debtor. The relief sought for in E.A.No.27 of 2010 reads as hereunder: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit the petitioner herein prays to this Hon’ble Court to stay all further proceedings in the E.P. in view of the case 11 of 2008 before the BIFR and pass such other or further order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 6. The principal grievance of the petitioner is that he was not put on notice when E.P. was advanced from 19-03-2010 to 10-03- 2010 despite his filing application in E.A.No.27 of 2010 in E.P.No.24 of 2008 seeking stay of all proceedings. 7. In that view of the matter, this revision is disposed of keeping the order dated 10-03-2010 passed in E.P.No.24 of 2008 in abeyance pending E.A.No.27 of 2010. The order dated 10-03- 2010 passed in E.P.No.24 of 2008 shall stand revived after disposal of E.A.No.27 of 2010. ___________________________ B. SESHASAYANA REDDY, J September 24, 2010. PN THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2407 of 2010 September 24, 2010