IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.818 of 2011 Ram Autar Prasad Versus Union of India & Ors ---------------------------------- . 28.09.2011 This contempt application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner in view of the order passed on 13.08.2011. While disposing of the contempt application, this court may observe that so far as the Land Acquisition Officer’s observation that Raju Mahto, Suryadeo Mahto and Gandhi Mahto cannot be heard in the matter as they are not parties in the writ application seems to be unwarranted. They have filed a petition claiming to be land holder, which should be heard, so that nothing be left for further litigation. In any case, if the aforesaid persons may file a separate application, then notice would be required to be sent to Ram Awatar and others so that the matter can be decided. This contempt application is disposed with the aforesaid observation. Ravi/- (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)