IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 17275 of 2001 Between: P. Narasimulu, s/o. Narasimulu, R/o. Indalwai, Dichpalli Mandal, Nizamabad District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Co-operative Tribunal at Hyderabad represented by its Secretary, Chandravihar, M.J. Road, Hyderabad. 2 Divisional Cooperative Officer, Nizamabad, Nizamabad Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of CERTIORARI calling for the records from the Cooperative Tribunal at Hyderabad, the 1st respondent herein pertaining to the order dated 16-7-2001 in I.A.No. 919/2000 in C.T.A.No.502/1996 and quash the same and restore the C.T.A.No.502/1996 on file and dispose off the same on merits by giving an opportunity of hearing to both the parties and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.L.V.RANGACHARY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: This Writ Petition has been listed today ‘for withdrawal’ on the letter filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the Registry requesting to list the writ petition for ‘withdrawal’ on the ground that the petitioner has instructed him to withdraw the writ petition. When the writ Petition is taken up, the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition on the ground that the matter is settled out of court. Permission is accorded. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ___________________ 4th April, 2008 GODA RAGHURAM, J vtv