IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.304 of 2010 BABBAN RAJAK @ BABBAN RAM RAJAK Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3 25.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent no. 6 deserves to be prosecuted for assaulting and abusing the petitioner and his family members. The petitioner accordingly informed the respondent no.4, however no F.I.R. is registered and proceeded. Learned counsel for the State submits that writ proceeding is not the appropriate forum and the petitioner ought to have taken the appropriate recourse of law as provided under the Code of Criminal Procedure. Considering the submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to interfere into the matter. However, it will be open for the petitioner to take the appropriate recourse of law as provided under the Code of Criminal Procedure for redressal of his grievances as raised in this writ application. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)