1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.201 OF 2009 (Daulat s/o Bapurao Punvatkar vs. Gram Panchayat, Ranala and others) ___________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : FEBRUARY 5, 2009 Heard Shri Radke, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Sambre, learned Government Pleader for the respondent Authorities. The grievance of the petitioner is in respect of non-implementation of direction issued by the Block Development Officer to the Sarpanch/Secretary of Gram Panchayat, Ranala, dated 13.6.2008, which is annexed as Annexure “C” to the petition. It is contended that petitioner was terminated from the post of Clerk. The petitioner filed an appeal against the said order, which was allowed by the concerned Authority and by communication dated 13.6.2008, addressed to the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, petitioner was asked to be reinstated in his original post. 2 Shri Radke, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that since Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat has not implemented the said order, petitioner has filed the present petition for necessary directions. In the circumstances, we direct the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat to implement the order dated 13.6.2008 issued by the Block Development Officer, if it is in force and there is no other legal impediment in doing so. With these observations and directions, the petition is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE khj