1 caf3617-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION rpa CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3617 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 532 OF 2001 Sukhdeo M. Patole .. Applicant V/s. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai .. Respondents .... Ms. Aparna Murlidharan i/b. Mr. P. G. Lad for the applicant. Mr. Vinod Mahadik for Respondent-BMC. .... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : JANUARY 21, 2011. P.C. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents opposes the prayer for condonation of delay and restoration. The Appeal was dismissed in default as the Advocate for the appellant could not remain present. Reasons have been set out in the civil application for absence of the advocate as also for delay in filing the application. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents on instructions states that the suit structure is in existence. 2 caf3617-10 2. Hence, a case is made out for restoration of the Appeal as well as restoration of the interim relief operating during the pendency of the Appeal. Accordingly, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). It is clarified that the interim relief granted earlier is also restored. JUDGE