IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.186 of 2009 RAGHU NANDAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 8.9.2009 The petitioner apprehends dispossession from property at the behest on respondent nos. 6 to 13. Enclosed to the writ application is a report of the District Magistrate, Nalanda addressed to the Commissioner, Patna Division in response to the representation of the petitioner. The petitioner seems to be aggrieved by the action of the agnates in respect of any property. The report of the District Magistrate referred to above dated 26.9.2007 states that the matter relates to a dispute of title which could be settled only by a competent Civil Court. In the writ application there are no allegations of any acts of the State or its authorities in excess of the law interfering with the rights of enjoying of the petitioner with his property. This Court finds no reason to pass any positive order in the matter in view of the fact stated in the letter of the District Magistrate dated 26.9.2007. The petitioner may have his remedies before the competent Civil Court. The writ application is dismissed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)