1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR LETTERS PATENT AQPPEAL NO: 277/2006 (Ku. Pushpa Akarte vs. Shri Sai Seva Shikshan Mandal, Ramtek and others) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders. .................................................................................................................................................................. Mr. P.C.Marpakwar, Adv. for appellant; Mr. C.S. Kaptan Adv.for R-1 and 2 Smt. Jog, AGP for R-3 and 4 CORAM: A.P.LAVANDE & R.V.MORE, JJ. DATED: 31 st July, 2007 . *** 1. Heard respective Counsel. 2. By this Letters Patent Appeal, appellant takes exception to the order dated 11th September 2006 passed by learned single Judge dismissing Writ Petition No.3591/2004 filed by the appellant/petitioner, challenging the order passed by School Tribunal dismissing appeal filed against the order of termination, issued by Respondent No.1. 3. The School Tribunal as well as learned single Judge have concurrently held that the petitioner was appointed 2 on year-to-year basis as a substitute teacher in place of Shri A.P.Meshram and since the termination of said Shri Meshram was set aside by the School Tribunal and he was reinstated the services of petitioner were terminated. There is absolutely no perversity in the finding recorded by the School Tribunal which has been upheld by learned single Judge. We, therefore, find no perversity in the said finding given by the School Tribunal as well as learned single Judge to warrant interference in appeal. Hence LPA is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE sahare