IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 6TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 25723 of 2011(M) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- THOMAS, S/O.DEVASIA, NADUVATHETTU HOUSE, ELAPPALLY P.O., THODUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.S.K.MURALEEDHARA KAIMAL RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI CIVIL STATION, PAINAVU P.O. 2. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, THODUPUZHA-685 584. 3. SUPERINTENDENT, OFFICE OF THE RE-SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, THODUPUZHA-685 584. 4. ARAKKULAM FARMER'S SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. IN SHORT ASCO BANK, ARAKKULAM, THODUPUZHA. R1 TO R3 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/09/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.25723/2011 M APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.553/76 DTD. 20/02/1976 OF SRO, KARIKODE PURCHASED BY LATE DEVASIA NADUVATHETTU. P2: COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO.371/94 DTD. 1/03/94 OF SRO, KARIKODE. P3: COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DTD. 18/12/2003. P4: COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.552/1976 DTD.20/02/1976. P5: COPY OF THE PETITION DEED NO.948/1981 DTD. 5/03/1981. P6: COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD. 20/03/1992. P7: COPY OF THE RECEIPT DTD. 1/03/1995 ISSUED FROM THE ELAPPALLY VILLAGE OFFICE. P8: COPY OF THE REPLY DTD. 5/07/2011 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P9: COPY OF THE REPLY DTD. 10/08/2011 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P10: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD. 13/09/2011 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT WITH A/D. P10: COPY OF THE REQUEST DTD. 16/02/2011 FOR PLACING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................................................... W.P.(C).25723/2011 .............................................. Dated this the 28th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT The prayer sought in the writ petition is for a direction to the second respondent to take action on Ext.P10 application wherein the petitioner is seeking fixation of boundary between the properties covered by Exts.P2 and P3 on the one side and Ext.P6 on the other. Having regard to the case of the petitioner regarding the pendency of the application, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and take action on Ext.P10 with notice to the affected parties. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs