C.W.P. No. 20772 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 20772 of 2011 Date of Decision:- 09.11.2011 Kalawati Verma .....Petitioner Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and others .....Respondents CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present:- Ms. Vandana Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioner. **** SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J(Oral). The petitioner has filed the instant petition for quashing the demand notice (Annexure P-55) vide which the petitioner has been asked to deposit a sum of Rs. 2,06,667/- upto 2009, as extension fee. Undisputedly the possession was given to the petitioner on 26.11.1991 but inspite of that the petitioner failed to get the sanction of the building plan by 30.6.2007. Due to non-construction of building on the said plot at one point of time the plot was also resumed but later on resumption order was set aside by this Court vide order dated 19.5.2009 (Annexure P- 50). While passing the said order it was specifically ordered by this Court that the said order have no bearing on the issue of extension fee which is pending consideration before the State Commission. Since, the petitioner has not constructed the building for a long time as per the HUDA Rules, the petitioner is liable to pay the extension fee. As such, we do not find any ground to interfere in the impugned order on the ground that the petitioner C.W.P. No. 20772 of 2011 2 is not liable to pay the extension fee. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved about the calculation of the amount of extension fee, it will be open for the petitioner to approach the concerned authorities for the same. Dismissed. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE 09.11.2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) reema JUDGE