IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2244 of 2008 RADHA RAMAN PANDEY . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 18.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 1.11.2007 by which his order of regularization dated 30.11.2006 in the capacity of Pump Operator has been set aside and he has been reverted to his status of daily wager. The short submission is that once the petitioner was regularized from his original appointment on Daily wages in 1985, he acquired the status of a permanent employee. If he was to be reverted a procedure was required to be followed by giving him a show cause notice and consideration of the same. There could not be any ex parte reversion. Counsel for the State is unable to satisfy the Court from the counter affidavit and its enclosures that any show cause notice was issued to the petitioner prior to his reversion. Any order that may have been passed in context of certain others in pursuance of any direction of this Court shall not automatically apply to the petitioner as the case of 2 the petitioner has to be decided on its own facts. The order of reversion dated 1.11.2007 is accordingly set aside. The respondents are at liberty to issue a show cause notice to the petitioner and then proceed to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The writ application stands allowed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)