IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY C IVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 66 OF 2009 Rakhmaji Kondiba Wankar, since deceased through his heirs and legal representatives: Kalawati Rakhmaji Wankar & Ors. ... Appellants (Orig.Defendants) Versus Venkatesh Ranjana Goski, since deceased through his heirs and legal representatives: 1. Chandrabhaga Venkatesh Goski & Ors. ... Respondents (Org. Plaintiffs) Ms. Pallavi Dabholkar, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. T.D.Deshmukh,Advocate, for the respondents. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 20th July, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Admit the Appeal on the following substantial questions of law :- 1. Whether the suit is barred by the limitation ? 2. Whether the Courts below exercised the discretion to pass the decree for specific performance in favour of the plaintiffs/ respondents overlooking the fact that due to lapse of 24 years without any fault on the part of the appellants/defendants,the prices of the immovable property have increased manifold and the decree may cause irreparable loss to the defendants/appellants ? (J.H.BHATIA,J.)