IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.322 of 2011 MADAN SINGH @ SIPPU SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 01.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is husband of the deceased and there is allegation that he alongwith his other family members used to torture the deceased on account of non-fulfillment of illegal demand and, subsequently, they committed the murder of the deceased and disposed of her dead body. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the instant case has been lodged by the uncle of the deceased and when in course of investigation, the statement of mother of the deceased was recorded by the I.O., the mother of the deceased has nowhere stated about the above-said illegal demand rather she very clearly accepted that she had got information about the death of her daughter on telephone and at that time, it was informed to her that her daughter died of abdominal pain. Furthermore, learned counsel for the petitioner refers Paragraph-32 of the case diary and submits that before death, the deceased was got treated by a local doctor whose statement has been recorded by the I.O. at the above-said paragraph of the case diary. On the otherhand, learned counsel for the state opposes the prayer submitting 2 that all the ingredients of section-304B of the Indian Penal Code are present in this case, so petitioner does not deserve the privilege of bail. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Madan Singh @ Sippu Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 324 of 2009 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)