IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR JUDGMENT RANJEET SINGH GOYAR VS. STATE OF RAJ. AND ANR. SB Criminal Revision Pet. No. 1373 OF 2008 under Section 397 read with section 401 Cr.P.C. against the order dated June 17, 2008 of Addl. Sessions No.2 Ajmer in criminal appeal No. 285 of 2007 dismissing the appeal against the judgment dated September21, 2007 passed by Judicial Magistrate No.1 Ajmer in Criminal case No. 407 of 2006 whereby the accused was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for six months and fine of Rs. 50,000/- Date of Order : November 10, 2008 PRESENT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Mr. Rohit Tiwari for the petitioner. Ms. Girish Khandelwal for the complainant. Mr. D.D.Sharma PP for the State BY THE COURT : The petitioner has filed this revision petition against the judgment dated June 17, 2008 whereby his appeal against the judgment of conviction dated September 21, 2007 of Judicial Magistrate No.1 Ajmer was dismissed. The Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused Ranjeet Singh for the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for six months and fine of Rs. 50,000/-. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has paid a sum of Rs. 50,000/- to the complainant and a compromise to this effect has also been filed before this Court. The petitioner has remained in custody for a period of more than 4 and half months. The learned counsel submits that ends of justice would be met in case the petitioner is sentenced to the period already undergone by him. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. I am satisfied that the judgment of conviction of the courts below are not perverse and there is no infirmity or illegality in the same. The petitioner has already paid the fine of Rs. 50,000/- to the complainant and a compromise has also been filed in this respect before this court. The petitioner has remained in custody for more than 4 and half months and ends of justice would be met in case the petitioner is sentenced to the period already undergone by him. The petitioner shall be released forthwith for the period already undergone by him in case he is not required to be detained in any other case. 3. The revision petition is disposed of as per the directions given above. The petitioner shall be released forthwith in case is he is not required to be detained in any other case. The criminal miscellaneous petition for suspension of sentence stands disposed, as the main petition has been disposed of. (Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J. OPPareek/