Cm? gza rm?” (D IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. yy’z?/20 1 1 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under:— 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As mentioned above in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: As mentioned above in the cause title. WM ? PETITIONER: ‘ Ashok Kumar Kant S/o Shri Ram Lal Kant aged about 49 W ears, Upper Division Teacher, m5 Mal ‘Q‘zz‘i \“Q :‘6sé‘xg aaw Bilha, District — Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) r/ 2. District Education Officer, District Bilaspur (C.G.) V H 3‘ Block Education Officer, ‘ Block Bilha District Bilaspur (C.G.) Joint Director, Treasury, accounts, pension, Bilaspur District—Biiaspur (C.G.) :25” HIGI-i COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON’BLE SHR} JUSTICE PRlTlNKER DIWAKER W.P.!S§ N0. 4722! 201 1 PETITIOKER Ashok Kumar Kain Versus RESPONDENTS State of (1G. 8r, Othms WRXT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 225(227 OF THE CONgTiTUTxON OF a‘ INDIA Aggearance: ‘ Shli Ashwini Shukla, counsc1 for the pefitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, P.L. for the State. om oRnER (18.03.2011; Counsel for the patitioner submitS That thc petiticnar is sntitkd t0 benefit of two advanw incrsments on account of he having yassad B3111. cxamination in ths year 199 1 before his appointment at his own cost. It is submitted that the issue invoived, in the present petition is no longer res integra and me same. has been finally decided by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Asha Saxena Vs. State of M.P. & crs. 2009 umMPJR (so) 59. It is further submitted that this Court hasaloo taken a similar View in its order dated 6.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S} No. 6257} 2008. Counsel for the petitioners further submits that the order dated 2§.4.2010 passed in Writ Apyeal NO. 124/2009, wherein relying upon the. judgment of the Supreme Court in the case. of Asha Saxena (supra) and the order passed by this Cour“: m another Writ Appeal No. 87/2009, diiections have been issued for consideration of the case for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21.9. 1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after Verification of the facts pleaded in the petition. £6 Counsel for the State submits that case of fhe peh‘tioner wauld also be considered on the same lines. In View of above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21.9.1974 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after vexihcation of the facts pleaded in the petition within a period of four months from today. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. / ”M Sdl- Pritinker Diwaker Judge