'^v;LVX';L'^;'^^'l:.^^^A^^Ui _^'ff^-^.^,,., ^^p^ ] m Tmfssm cajm> op ^DIC^TURK AT JABAJ-RJR CM.X^ • IT ^gTITI®igK3. <3^t/£/ ©F2©©©* MtIT JlETmCN ®MDE&AHTlSi£226/227 OF Tm C©NSTITm% ?ilN©M* •<; ~ ' " "". •-••:- ^.. .—— ^ ^etiti©Qer sss Doaaaia Stegh BhaMdari, s©iaof Shrt Tfeamaraia Bhaa^arl, aged abo^it 3g years, ©ccupatioiii Ass istaiat Vetnary Fiel d ©fficer, Bt3rg> Besldeat ef l.tmasi<gih, flstt^ Durg, (N»P»). ( Y e r s us ) Sespoadeirts tss l) ladra ©an^iKrisfal^ ^ishwavidhlay&^ througM tt^ aegis-trar Krasfeak Nagaa; ialpyr (i&f>») • ^ 2) Dean,. ...I 11.. - ... ....-;..;....... ._, College ofjVe^e^ary Scie@ce a^el A^iaal &s^aa^ary, Aa^ora, ©IsferjLct INrg, (M»M)* * » • » i • ' .: •. '•^ l'K'^li?pyNS^^^^^^^^^^^^ Tn^ XI-HC—78 3?i^T ^T ^rN? 1!^JT W^T^lN' ~5~^ '^WWi, %9xll<>-l4!<o, [^idl'y^ C^.^P^ ^?TOW^5?W""""""""""""""""""""T"7"""ff^200D ^l^T'^T^R' (^I^^?) l^^?WH^T^T^ th<rt 20-2-2004 Shri Prashant Jayaswal, Shri B. 0.6uru. couisel for Heard bolh thecounsel. The petitioner has preferre|il dated 24th May, 2000 passed by| rejected the representation of the The petitioner's case is appointed as Veterinary Field setected for Bachelor of (B.V.S.C. <& A.H.) as a departmentalj He appeared in the First Year subjects. Similarly. he again payers but he could pass in two appeared in four* subjects and pass two subjects, namely Animal eachsubject. As per the notification respondents, the petitioner was no^ he had fdled in all subjects of fir^l consecutive acodemic years. appecr^d pap^rs OQOl^ <^i^?<vi4ii "w^ff ^ f^ft ^^ii ^ 3tf^[3TT^T coui^el fop the petitioner. tliie respondents. this petition being aggrieved by the order reqaondent No.2 whereby respondent No.2 tetitioner vide Annexure P/7. he is <» degree holder of B.SC. and wos Aisistant. On 30.12.1996 the petitioner was Veterir|ary Science and Anitnai Husbandty Course 1 candidat®and joined the course on 8.1.1997. exaitiination in Jonuory. 1997, but fdled in all the in the yeor 1998 and could not pass in four pa(4rs. Therefore. in the yeor 1999 the petitioner passed two subjects. however, he could not ^reeding and 6enetics oniy by three marks in dt. 4.11.1997 (Annexure P/3) issued by the altowed to continue in the academic course as fir^t year ond thereafter, in four subjects in two T XI-HC—78 -s?P??'fT ^P-IT^ T^ ^!<4i<ri^, 'g^ftWK, f^<rtl-(-!^< ^......^..s....^.^f...^^ ^TI^T'^R^T (^i^q^?) ^^r^ifN^" ^T^ii^r^^N' l^i^^ftna^? Thle maximljm The main grievan<«ot The conducted by 1+ie various Vetetinary guidelines isaied by the Veterin4ry under the Veterinary Coundl of Education begree Course - B,V.S.<p, ftegulation alt the Universities ar^ for evaluation and examination. is granting 5 grace marks in as the case may be) whereas thej granting simitar relief to their petitioner secured three marks of allowing grace marks as is bein^ appjied by the University of pe^ondent have been dectared passed. As v^i same principle for allowing grace University, therefore <n view of allowed to make a detailed tum they be directed to considerj passing a reasoned and approprjiate respoodents hasno objection. te^s 4><^?d^1'1 ^l^dT "^ fe^ Tt^5R ^^tRR^n^T p^titioner is that all the examinations are Science Universities under the Coundt of India from time to time Ijndia (Minimum Standards of Veterinary i.4:. & A. H.) ftegulations, 1993. Under this supposed to foltow the similar patt-em Jawaharlal Nehru University, Jabalpur of two ajibjects (J^eory and Practical University of respondents 1 A 2 is not ^tudents. As Jn the thircl attempt the in each two subjects if same principle followfed by the Jabalpur University is ^ondents 1 & 2, the petitioner ought to p^spondents 1 & 2 are not following the ^narks as is being done by the Jabalpur above situation 1+ie petitioner moy be to re^ondents 1 and 2 ond in the representation of the petitioner by order, to vriiich counsel for the tlie repre^entation f cu>)' XI-HC—78 3Tl^i^I^?N' ^fm 3?[^? ^FHT^- Thakur ;^\ ~-y/.:s 'n^? .1~'' ^^ ^TPTI^FT, 'g'^PT^, ^^1i^^< tJ .^ '^ro^rr^ww•-•••-•"—••••A---w-"'r"^"^-^ 200o ^T!^T TR^ ( y<t^q^) '^^T^T^rft^3^? -s-i '^TErf^HThT 'HTR^ff ^* 'feT^t <f^<^l< ^atRw^n^r Having heard leamed cot|insel for the parties and having regard to the facts and drcuihstances o'Fjthe case'.the petitioner is aljowed to make a detailed representation wit^iin a period 'of 10 days from today to re^ondents 1 A 2, and in tum as possible, but not tater thanj representation, with a reasone<| the petitioner. With the above directi<j will decidte the representation as early 30 days from the date of receipt of the order considering all the points raised by ns and observations, -riie petition stands disposed of. In view of this order, I.4No&5143/2002 and 5786/2002 also stcnd disposed of. Cert'ified copy as per njlels. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ••^