RSA No.465 of 2010 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.465 of 2010 (O&M). Decided on: April 19, 2011. Baldev Singh. .. Appellant VERSUS Bal Kishan and others. .. Respondents * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporter? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? * * * PRESENT Mr.Pritam Saini, Advocate, for the appellant. M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Suit of the plaintiff-respondent for recovery has been decreed on the basis of Bahi entries. Counsel for the appellant has submitted that EX.P10 contains overwriting making the Bahi entry inadmissible. I have heard the counsel for the appellant and seen . . . 1 RSA No.465 of 2010 (O&M) the photocopy of Bahi entry EX.P10. The said entry has been considered by both the Courts below which arrived at the conclusion that there is no cutting in the figure ` 4,00,50/-. In view of current finding of fact determining the liability of the defendant-appellant on the basis of Bahi entries, no ground is made out for interference in the second appeal. No substantial question of law is involved. Dismissed. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE April 19, 2011. rka . . . 2