1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.16 OF 2010 In WRIT PETITION NO.259 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13 OF 2010 In LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.16 OF 2010 In WRIT PETITION NO.259 OF 2008 M/s.Technocraft Industries (India) Ltd. : Appellant (Orig. Respondent) V/s. Shri Pandurang Vaniyar : Respondent (Orig. Petitioner) .... Mr.A.V. Bukhari with Mr.A.K.Jalisatgi for the appellant. None present for the respondent. .... CORAM : J.N.PATEL, ACTING C.J. & B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : JANUARY 21, 2010. P.C.: By this Letters Patent Appeal, the appellant challenged the order passed by the learned single Judge dated 23.11.2009 allowing the petition filed by the respondent-workman. While allowing the petition filed by the respondent-workman, the learned single Judge found that the Labour 2 Court had erred in observing that the list of witnesses was not produced when, as a matter of fact, the list of witnesses was produced on 5.8.2007. The learned single Judge found that in the interest of justice, full opportunity to lead evidence was necessary to be given. No error of law is found in the impugned order warranting interference by invoking the appellate jurisdiction. Letters Patent Appeal is, therefore, dismissed. 2. In view of the dismissal of the Letters Patent Appeal, the Civil Application does not survive and the same stands dismissed. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE B. R. GAVAI, J.