IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M 36509 of 2010 Date of decision: 3.1.2011 Surinder ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Narinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Amandeep Singh, AAG, Haryana Mr.NS Shekhawat, Advocate for the complainant. *** Ram Chand Gupta, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed by petitioner Surinder under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 212 dated 26.11.2010 registered under Sections 323, 452, 506 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act at Police Station Bilaspur, District Gurgaon. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. This Court while issuing notice of motion on 14.12.2010 passed the following order:- “Contends that even from the averments in the FIR, no offence under Section 452 IPC is made out. Further contends that a simple verbal altercation has been exaggerated to give the shape of a midnight attack. It is also contended that though there are allegations that injuries were caused to complainant and Kalu and however, none of them was medico CRM No.M 36509 of 2010 -2- legally examined and hence, it is contended that it is a case of no injury. Notice of motion for 3.1.2011. However, petitioner is directed to join the investigation and in case he is arrested, he shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has already joined the investigation pursuant to said order dated 14.12.2010. It has also been stated by learned counsel for the State that the petitioner has joined the investigation and that he is no more required for any custodial interrogation. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail petition filed on behalf of petitioner Surinder is accepted and order dated 14.12.2010 granting interim bail in favour of the petitioner is, hereby, made absolute subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. January 03, 2011 (RAM CHAND GUPTA) gsv JUDGE