..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2253 OF 2008 1. Shri Balaram Shantaram Gaikar, 2. Tanaji Rambhaji Gaikwar, & 3. Shri Sudam Janu Gaikar. ..Applicants. Versus Versus Versus State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Mr.P.L.Sapkale, Adv. for the applicants. Mrs.Priti Walimbe, Adv. for orig.complainant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 1st September, 2008. DATED : 1st September, 2008. DATED : 1st September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard both sides. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in C.R.No.I-79 of 2008 of Kalyan Taluka Police Station. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. The learned Advocate for the applicant states that when the applicants had preferred an application for bail before the Sessions Court, at that time the investigation was going on and the charge-sheet was not filed. The learned Advocate for the applicant states now the charge-sheet has been filed, hence he seeks leave to withdraw this application with liberty to file a fresh application for bail before the Sessions Court in ..(2).. view of the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed. Liberty as prayed is granted. On such application being preferred before the Sessions Court, the learned Sessions Judge to consider the same afresh and dispose it of on merits. 4. With the above observation, Criminal Application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed and is disposed of as such. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)