c^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH „, ^"o-^ei^ CONTEMPT RR^^SN N0. 'Q^ \ /2010 PETITIONER y..v» ••te.--" ^ SW* \^- ^^ ^*- ':",'}^ ?fS^ ^A., .»'>• P.S. SHRIVASTAVA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/0. LATE SHRI NOHARI LAL SHRIVASTAVA, PRESENTLY POSTED AS SENIOR AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BLOCK PANDARIYA, DISTRICT KAWARDHA (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : B.L. AGRAWAL, SECRETARY, GOVT. OF CHHATTISGARH, DEPTT. OF AGRICULTURE, DKS BHAWAN, MANTRALAYA, RAIPUR, CHHATTISGARH P.R. KRIDATYA, DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF AGRICULTURE, RAIPUR, CHHATTISGARH P.S. TIWARI, DEPUTT SECRETARY, GOVT. OF CHHATTISGARH, DEPTT. OFAGRICULTURE, DKS BHAWAN, MANTRALAYA, RAIPUR, CHHATTISGARH R.L. DHURANDHAR, DEPUTt' DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, DURG, CHHATTISGARH V-- CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 3S^'Wf3FlW wn.Effl^rgiiiR; Tumane -ysi ^TqR:R, '^xrnw?, T^irey G^ •C^ssCc')i^ '^ rirtd 201 ^) •BigTCR'aitd .3T^!ff .-_.-.- L SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan 20-10.M11 Shri N. K. Chatterji, counsel foi Shri Sushil Dubey, counsel for Heard. Learned counsel for the partie^ jointly submitted that the order of the Court passed earlier on 26-10-20p9 has been complied with. A pemsal of order dated 03-Q9-2011 shows that after the order was passed by this Court on 26-1p-20(B, an order was passaj on 17-02-2010, by which, oonsidering r^presentations of the petitioner, the order of promotion dated 01-10-2^08 and modifled promotbn orcler dated 31-01-2009 was cancellai. L|ater on, the petitioner filed a writ petitton, in which, an order was pass^d on 23-08-2011, and finally, order dated 03-09-2011 has b^n passed]in compliance of the order passed by this Court. Taking into consideration th^t in compliance of order dated 26-10-2009, an order was passed 0)1 17-02-2010, l am not inclined to proceed further in the matter. In view of above considerati^n, 1 am not inclined to proceal against the respondent No.3. who notice, in these proceedings. Rule is flherefore discharged. Accordingly, the petition is fina!iy_dB@roed off. ^T<i5?13ih WT^ '? fSW 'ifsf^K ^ stRTi ai^t Shrivastava. .1. the petitioner. respondents No.1, 2 & 4. pid not appear despite service of Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge wis-Si!i ^fti g5?TCRr, wrmTira—VS/140—2/2011—1,50,000. [A^