IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.: 6204/2008 Decided on: 29.06.2010 ______________________________________________________ Naresh Kumar ..…..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others. ….…. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Lokender Pal Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Deputy Advocate General. Deepak Gupta, J (oral) By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed that the order Annexure “A” whereby penalty of stoppage of two increments has been imposed upon him, be quashed with all consequential benefits. The main ground raised by the petitioner is that a copy of the inquiry report was not supplied to him before passing final order and as such the final order is invalid. Mr. Lokender Pal Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner states that in fact, the petitioner had also filed an appeal against the said order which according to him, is still pending. 2. This case is coming before this Court after 11 years and, therefore, I do not want to go into the merits of the case. The interest of justice will be served in case the respondents are …2… directed to supply a copy of inquiry report to the petitioner within four weeks from today. Thereafter, the petitioner within four weeks, thereafter may file supplementary grounds of appeal before the Appellate Authority if so advised. The Appellate Authority shall within eight weeks thereafter decide the appeal of the petitioner after taking into consideration all the grounds raised by the petitioner. 2. The petition is disposed of on the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs. . (Deepak Gupta) Judge June 29, 2010 “BRB”