IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22533 of 2010 NAND KISHORE RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 23.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Offence under Section 379 of the I.P.C. and other non-bailable offence may be ornamental but this petitioner is alleged for abusing in name of informant’s caste, Dusad to humiliate him. If the same was given to reply on frustration not to sell toddy at particular place can be taken in regular side otherwise anticipatory bail is not maintainable. The same is dismissed. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is rejected. However, petitioner is directed to surrender before the Court below and pray for regular bail which shall be decided on its own merit without being prejudiced by the rejection order on the same day. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)