IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.3028 of 1988 (O&M) Date of decision:25.08.2011 Ram Kumar, Sub-Inspector, A/89 (now Inspector), AEC, Police Station, Pipli, District Kurukshetra. ...Petitioner versus The State of Haryana, through the Secretary to Government of Haryana, Department of Home, Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh, and others. ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Satbir Singh Goripuria, DAG, Haryana. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No. 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? No. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? No. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) There is no representation for the petitioner when the matter is called. Counsel for the respondent is present and ready. The writ petition is dismissed for default for non-prosecution. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE 25.08.2011 sanjeev