1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eleventh day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms. Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.10420 of 2011 1 KANDHASAMY NADAR, S/O.DHANUSKODI NADAR 2 SURENDRAN 3 PALANISAMY NADAR 4 PALANI NADAR 5 SIVAMURUGAN NADAR 6 RAMAR NADAR 7 KANDHASAMY NADAR, S/O.ARUMUGA NADAR 8 MAYAKRISHNAN NADAR 9 MUNIASAMY NADAR 10 RAJARATHINAM NADAR ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 - 10 Vs THE STATE, REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUCHULI POLICE STATION THIRUCHULI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT CR.NO.NOT KNOWN/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. N.SATHISH BABU Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323, 385, 506(i) and 120(b) I.P.C., and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are arrayed as A1 to A10, due to temple dispute, the alleged occurrence has taken place and no one sustained injured in the alleged occurrence and the investigation is considerably over and they apprehend fro arrest and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) would submit that the case has been registered in Crime No.141 of 2011 for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) r/w. 120(b) I.P.C., and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the alleged occurrence has been taken place on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 30.06.2010 and a case has been registered against them for the offences under Sections 147, 294(b), 323, 385, 506(i) and 120(b) I.P.C., and the investigation is considerably over, I am inclined to grant anticipatpry bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously. 5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 11/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKOTTAI. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUCHULI POLICE STATION THIRUCHULI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. + 1 CC to M/S. N.SATHISH BABU Advocate SR.No.27391 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10420 of 2011 Date :11/08/2011 RJ/16.8.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/