HiGi-i COURT OF CHiiATTi$GARH A? BILA$i9UR DW§S1§N EENQ‘E 96mm §-i0?\§‘ELE $HR1 R13J§EV GUW’A. C.J. & HQN’BLE $HR! 5UNEL KUMAR SEN%“§A, J. WFEWQ N6.1é?2 O‘x‘ 2%? BE. Qweshi. Aged abaut 5.9 years, 8X0 Late Shri ’Nizamuddm Qures‘ni. Former Mini3ter and MLA. fmm Bhiiai Censtituency, R10 Bungaiow No.6 32 €unga¥<3wa 3héiai Nagar, Tehsi! & Disirict Dwg (03} Vemus §’e§§iioo Mme: Ariseiee 226/22? 63% ehe Coast§€u¢t§on o? imiia Pfeseni : Shri NK Agrawai §eamed Beauty Advccate Genera for respondent NGJ/Stata $hri Panka} Agrawal; {earned counsei f0: respondents NQ2 & 3. $EWT§GNER Br. N‘K‘ ‘Shukm. learned $enior Ccunse! with Ms. $en Guma. ieamed counsa} far the peziiéaner. Shri SK Eeriwa§, ieameci S?anaiing Counsei for resmndent No.4. QR£§ER g2“ Sememmrg 2%3 ) RE$§3QNE£§W3 1. iate of Chhatiisgfai'h Through ISecretary, Dopaomem of Local $eif Government/Urban Adminisira’tion, D‘Ks Bhawan, Eantyaiaya, Raipur (CE) 2. Municipai Corporatbn Bhi$ai Through The Muo§c§pa§ Sommssxoner 3. Vidya¥atan Bhasin. Aged abooi not kmown, Sfo Late Chunoi§a§ Ehasin, Mayor, Municipei Comoration, BhigaiJ 4. Union of indie Through Secretary. Human & Resources Depaomen‘i, New De§hi. The foilowing order of the Court was passed by Rageev Gupta, CJ. ; Petitioner — Bi). Qureshi has filed Ems writ peimon siy5ed as ‘Pubiic mierest Liiigation’ for ihe foliowing reliefs: L 1’0 kmdiy cali for ‘che recordo of “the case from the respondems ii. To kind§y issue a wréi‘. of cortioran‘ for quashmeni‘ of the impugneo resolution no.14 daied W/QIZGGB of the reepondent no.2 ano aH consequeni action themon in a bk? to Change me name of Rajiv Gandhi Sporis Compiex as Pa'ndit Din Eayai Upadhyaya Sports Comgaiex by me reepondents 1, 2 n- and 3. iii. To kindiy issue necessary mandamue or direcaiion to the respondent no.1 and 2 not to induige 5n oeeking to change ihe name of the aforesaid Rajiv Gandhi Sports Comptex toany other name on any other potitioai or other coneto‘eratton whatever in the oame of discharging any such obiigattons pursuant to the eiection to coveteo pobtio offices. iv. To kénoiy make any other order that may be deemod fit and just in the facts and orroumstanoes of the case inoiudin‘g awarding or” the coete to the petitioner.” 24 The petittoner has described himseit‘ in the writ petition as Former Minister and’ MLA. from Ehiiai Constituency. 3. Dr‘ MK. Shukta, iearned Senior Counsei for the petitioner informed us that the petitioner won the eieotion on the ticket of indien Nationai Congress. i i i 4. The rei'sefs soughi by ihe petitioner in the writ peiition féied as ‘Pubik: interesi Liiigation’ when exarmhed ’m ihe politicai background of the §e€§iéonen we are satisfied that the writ petit’mn med by the pei§i§0ner does not desarve to be entertained as ‘Pubiic imemst Htigation’ as the reliefs saugint by the petiimner are no't gomg to affect the pubiic a? large ’in any manner. 5. in this View 0f ihe matter, we denline to entertain the writ petitien as ‘Pubiic interest Litigation’. 6. The writ petition; therefore, faiie andis hereby dismissed. Sd/— 5‘“— Chief Justice i Sunil Kumar Sinha i v Judge