@ /w rr w “1” C g ‘(Xax’hg W IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W. P. S No. [2006 : f 1. ‘Ashok Kumar Kant, S/o Shri Ram Lal Kant, aged about 37 Years Assistant Teacher , Govt. Girls Hr.S.School , Bilha Block , Bilha. Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Firat Singh Kanwar, S/o‘ Shri Samme Singh Kanwar ‘ aged aboui 36 Years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School — Tiket (Pendri) ,Block— (C.G.) PETITIONERS Pathriya, Distt. Bilaspur VERSUS : / 1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary Department of Education D.K.S. Bhawan Raipvr r we» Director ,Public Instruction ‘,Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur RESPONDENTS District Education Officer, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT WRITS DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. The petitioner above named most respectfuliy submits as under:— PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. As mentioned in the cause title. m a XI—HC—78 @ EW,WW,W ‘ W.‘.f:.<~$2..§.%%9 mm GE 200 Q WW(W) mmm wmm WW§W®F§R mmwm %3T%mm%w 11.1 2.2006 Shri A.S. Rajput, Iearned cou nse! for the petitioners. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Iearned P. L. for the State/respondents. By this petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of india, the petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to pay the increments and seniority on the basis of the date of their initiai appointment in the light of the decision rendered by the learned State Administrative Tribunai, Jabalpur in Original Appiication No. 1452/1998 (Harish Chandra Singh and others Vs. State of MP. and others) dated 31 .1 .2000 2. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioners placed on record copy of the order dated 3rd October 2006 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. 5473/2006 (Rake Kumar Sharma and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and other) and in Writ Petition (S) No. 5474/2006 (Jai Nath Bajpai Vs. Sta e of Ch‘hattisgarh and others) and submits that the petitioners are simi arly situated, therefore, the simiiar order may be passed. 3. The case of the petitioners is that they were appointed as Assistant Teachers in the Schooi E ucation Department on probation for a period of two years with the ti d saiary. However, iater on, after completion of two years’ probation, he petitioner was regularized but, they were not given the regular pa scale from the date of their initial appointment. Other similarly situ ted teachers moved the State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur for regular pay-scale, wherein learned Tribunal vide order dated 1.1 .2000 allowed the same. The petitioners made several repres ntations to accord the same s XI-HC—78 WW,W,W trrlm'rm A“[Z‘KHSZ . .6. 79.0.. .111 2006 mww WWW matmm WW%‘WW éqwm treatment as they were also simila have not paid any heed. Thus, this g rly situated, but, the respondents )etition. Wm (Wis) @ 4. Learned Icounsel for the peti ‘ioners submits that the petitioners ‘2 may be ailowed to make a represe tation to respondent No.1 to give similar treatment to the petitioner and same pay-scaie which has been sanctioned to other similariy ituated teachers on account of the order of the'State Administrative ribunal dated 31.1.2000, to which learned counsel for the respondent IState has no objection. 5. Having heard iearned couns lfor the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of th case, in the opinion of this Court, the Iimited prayer made by learned ounsel for the petitioners appears ’ to be reasonable. Therefore, the etitioners are allowed to make a ‘ representation within a period of weeks from today to respondent No.1, raising all their grievances a d, in turn, respondent No.1 shall decide the said representation in a objective manner within a period of 30 days from the date of rec ipt of such representation, after v considering all the points raised y the petitioners and taking into (v account the order dated 31.1.20 0 passed by the learned State Administrative Tribunal in Original pplication No. 1452/1 998. 6. The writ petition is accordin ly disposed of with the aforesaid ' direction. No order as to costs. MW’ 7. Certified copy as per rules. Sdl- i Dhirendra Mishra Judge W ' P.T.O.