+ 32. r 33. + * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.,P.(C) 8490/2009 A.B. MITTRA Petitioner Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Adv. versus NDMC Respondent Through: Ms. Madhu Tewatia with Ms. Sidhi Arora, Advocates for NDMC. W.P.(C) 8491/2009 A.B. MITTRA & AN R. Petitioner Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Adv. versus NDMC Respondent Through: Ms. Madhu Tewatia with Ms. Sidhi Arora, Advocates for NDMC. 35. + W.P.(C) 8496/2009 DEV RANJAN MITIRA Petitioner Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Adv. versus Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified S I,'! 36. + NDMC . Respondent Through: Ms. Madhu Tewatia with Ms. Sidhi Arora, Advocates for NDMC. W.P.(C) 8497/2009 INDRANEEL MITTRA Petitioner Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Adv. versus NDMC Respondent Through: Ms. Madhu Tew.atia with Ms. Sidhi Arora, Advocates for NDMC. 37. + 1 38. + W.P.(C) 8498/2009 DEV RANJAN MITIRA Petitioner Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Adv. versus NDMC Respondent Through: Ms. Madhu Tewatia with Ms. Sidhi Arora, Advocates for NDMC. W.P.(C) 8499/2009 (3 A.B. MITIRA & ANR. . Petitioner Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Adv. versus NDMC Respondent Through: Ms. Madhu Tewatia with Ms. Sidhi Arora, Advocates for NDMC. .39. I + W.P.(C) 8500/2009 A.B. MITTRA & AN R. Petitioner Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Adv. versus NDMC Respondent • Through: Ms. Madhu Tewatia with Ms. Sidhi Arora, Advocates for NDMC. .4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA ORDER % . 24.04.2009 1. The question involved in the present writ petitions relate to vacancy remission during the period 3rd September, 2006 to 31 s' March, 2007 and the alleged arrears. The petitioner alleges that he has written repeated letters but the respondent has not replied/responded but has sent a provisional attachment notice, which is impugned in the writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent, who appears on I advance notice, states that no punitive action will be taken for a period of ten days and the present writ petition will be treated as a representation made by the petitioner. She further states that if required the petitioner will be heard and an appropriate order will be passed within a period of ten days from today. 3. The petitioner will appear before the Director (Taxes) on 29st April, 2009 at 2.30 p.m. and if required, further hearing can be given to the petitioner. In case the petitioner is aggrieved by any order, he will be at liberty to take remedial action as per law. The writ petition and all pending applications are disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties under signature of the Court Master. SANJIV KHANNA, J. APRIL 24, 2009 apK 0