ec‘rion 397/401 of fhe Cr.P.C.) (Criminal revision under- 19-6—2007 Shri V.C. Of‘miwar and Shri applicant ‘ Shri Akhii Mishra, Pam! Lav Heard. This revision has been 19-2—2001 passed by The Sessioris Sessiims Trial No.312/2000 wi‘ Sechom 376 of ‘rhe Indian Pane accused/applicant Brief facis necessary for i 1e disposai of ihis criminai revision are “iha‘r ‘ihe prosecui‘rix gave a coripiaim‘ To :Phe Member of Legisia‘i’ive Safish Gupi'a, counsei for The Iyer for i‘he STai'e/respondem. areferred againa? ihe order a‘afed Judge, Ambikapur, Dis‘hnicf Surguja, if: ereby ‘rhe charge punishabie under i Code has been framed againsi' ihe \ raw; a» (fgw W W 3‘ gra’m 200 ‘ W W (W) WWW aen WWm WWW WW EEmRH%am&w %u‘ W ~ Agplicam t Suban Ram, S/o Late Gamhar Ram, aged cu? 45 year's, R/o village Banai, Poiice Tafion Sifapur, Disfric‘r Surguja (CG). ‘ J amus- Respondem' Ta‘re of ChhaTTisgarh, Th rough Pohce Tafior: Sifapur, DisTricf Surgujc (C6). “gag CY- km ”a? vi 20m 3mm (W) XI-HC 78 mm,ea‘lw,%mgt QY~ Kw. i m‘ mm (W) £3“ WWW ammm mmm Wmawfz‘am %ai&mé~n%sr Sessions Judge framed ‘rhe cha 19-2-200i. Shri O?Taiwar, Eeamed c whim? ‘i‘he rmi'a‘er was repor‘red c Lggisla’i'ive Assembiy, as such, Vi I have per-used f'ne com ska has cafegoricaiiy smfed i‘im ?o§ice S‘m‘rion Sifapur, bu? prosecufrix has ca‘fegorkmiiy asked he? Thm‘ he wouid inciu ‘r’ojana mad war-fed abus§ng hzr if she wiH disclose fhis ‘x‘hirag ‘ g2??ing 10cm undar Indira Aim prosecufr'ix mme!y Senma?i §n ounsel for ‘l‘he accused/app!ican‘r, argued f‘mr one year "r§qa1' ‘i'eo To ‘H‘Ie Member a“? a case was made out 31am? made by 'rhe prosecufr-ix in which x? on 27-3—1999 she iodged The report m wofhmg was éone by fhe Poiice. The sfa'l'ed in her s‘m‘femen? fha'r accused 1e her name in J{he lis'i' of Indira Awas sexuaiiy md he eke “:‘h reafened her ‘i’ha? 'o anyone i‘hea he would no? heip her én 1s Yojana. The younger s§s‘i’er of The aer‘ sfa‘i'emen‘r uader $ec‘?ion 161 of fhe Code ef Criminai Procedura has . in vaew of 'l‘he above' I um of The considered opinion fha'r prime facie offence under Sewion 376 of The Indian Penal Code was made out agains‘r fhe accused/appiicahf. comemed, The? can be exami proceediwgs Le. s‘ra'i'emeh'l' of p for fhe defence esc. A? ‘i’his sfcge, 'i'he Cour? is required To look info fhe "g2 for commissim of The said effence on suppom‘ed #he above fact As far as delay and ofher aspeel's are wed by The Trial Cour? a? The *rime of rosecu‘lrix, cross-examination ‘oy coLmsel 20-4-2001 sfands vacafed. Record of fhe friai Cour? be sen? back 'io ‘ihe Sessions Judge for Scu- : LLC. BHADOO / Judge / expedifious Trial. f XIaHC—78 W WCxRwWr v W 200, V W W (W) : $$$ mmm Wm$m ‘5‘ mamriai cvaHable on record, as prima fade offence ‘is made ou‘r, men The Cour? is required fo frame fhe charge. The maferia! avaihbie on record ‘sqfisfied i'he above TeS‘i‘. Therefore, I om of The consider-ed opmion fha? the frioi Cour? hos no? commi‘ri‘ed any iilegoM‘y in fram'mg The charge for i commission of offence punisi'obie under sea-ion 376 of fhe I.P.C. The r revision being devoid of merit, is iiobie 'ro be dismissed and if is hereby V? dismissed. Consequenfiy, stay gran-fed by 'rhis Cour? vide order/ dated