THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1830 of 2004 ORDER: The lands of the petitioners were acquired by the Government for a public purpose and an award was passed by the Land Acquisition Officer. Not being satisfied with that, they sought for a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. Reference was made to the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram and the same was taken up as L.O.P.No.17 of 1987. Through its order, dated 27.02.1999, the trial Court enhanced the market value from Rs.4,000/- to Rs.15,000/- per acre. A.S.No.1638 of 2001 was filed before this Court by the Government, against the decree passed by the trial Court in L.O.P.No.17 of 1987. The appeal was dismissed on 02.07.2001. The petitioners filed an interlocutory application under Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 C.P.C. with a prayer to review the order, dated 27.02.2009. Their grievance was that the trial Court did not allow interest on the additional market value and solatium on the enhanced market value. Reliance was placed upon a judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sunder Vs. Union of India[1]. The trial Court dismissed the interlocutory application, through order, dated 19.11.2003. The same is challenged in this revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition. It is not in dispute that the order, dated 27.02.1999, in the L.O.P. has become the subject matter of A.S.No.1638 of 2001 and this Court dismissed the appeal on 02.07.2001. The result is that the order passed by the trial Court merged in the judgment rendered by this Court in the appeal. Therefore, the trial Court ceases to have any jurisdiction to review the order passed by it in the L.O.P. Hence, no exception can be taken to the order under revision. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:24.08.2009 kdl [1] 2001 (5) ALT 51 (SC)