AO No.53/2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, ACJ. This appeal, under Section 30 of Workmen’s Compensation Act has been preferred by the appellants- claimants against the judgment and order dated 03.02.2009 passed by Commissioner Workmen Compensation, Tehri Garhwal at New Tehri in WCC Case No. 4/2007, Smt. Beenu Devi and others vs. Shri Rajesh Prasad and another. Heard Sri Vinay Kumar, learned counsel for the appellants and perused the record. The learned Commissioner vide judgment and award dated 23.7.2008 awarded a sum of Rs.4,30,560/- and directed to deposit the award money within a period of one month and in case of default the claimants shall be entitled to get interest at the prevalent rate. Thereafter, claimants moved an application before the Commissioner on 26.11.2008 that opposite party did not deposit the awarded amount within the stipulated period, therefore, interest at the prevalent rate be awarded against the opposite party. The opposite party filed objection against the aforesaid application before learned Commissioner and showed its bonafide that delay has not been committed deliberately by it in depositing the awarded amount and the learned Commissioner accepted the plea of the insurance company and rejected the application of the claimants, demanding interest on the awarded amount. I am satisfied with the reasons recorded by the learned Commissioner in its order dated 03.02.2009 holding that deliberate delay was not there on the part of insurance company in depositing the awarded amount and has rightly rejected the application of the claimants for awarding interest in their favour. Appeal lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed in limine. (B.C.K., ACJ) 03.03.2009 SP