IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.5764 of 2011 Date of Decision : April 08, 2011. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. .....Petitioner versus The Commissioner, Patiala Division and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sukhbir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-Corporation seeks quashing of the order dated 25.7.2006 passed by the Chief Electrical Inspector, Punjab, which has been further upheld by the Appellate Authority vide its order dated 27.9.2007. The authorities below have upheld the assessment order passed by the petitioner-Corporation but have restricted its claim for recovery for a period of six months only in the light of the statutory mandate contained in Section 26 (6) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910. For the reasons already assigned by this Court in CWP No.2651 of 2009 (Ramesh Chander Kaila versus Punjab State Electricity Board and others), decided on 21.2.2011, there appears to be no ambiguity in the orders passed by the Authorities below. C.W.P.No .5764 of 2011 2 The reliance placed by the petitioner on Regulation 73.4.2.7 of the Punjab State Electricity Supply Regulations, cannot be gone into at this stage as no such plea has been taken by the petitioner before the Appellate Authority. Dismissed. April 08, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE