IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 5749 of 2009(K) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- ALAPPUZHA KIZHAKKE MUSLIM JAMA-ATH MASTHAN PALLY, REGISTRATION NO.KWB.B1 3489/RA, KALLUPALAM, ALAPPUZHA-688011, REP. BY IRS GENERAL SECRETARY, SHAJI KOYA, 42 YEARS, S/O. JANAB P.M.KOYA R/AT. SHAHABAS MANZIL, VELLAKKINAR WARD,ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.H.B.SHENOY SRI.B.ASHOK SHENOY SRI.THOMAS P.MAKIL SMT.LAKSHMI B.SHENOY SRI.ABU MATHEW SRI.SOBHAN GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, V.I.P.ROAD, 2. ALAPPUZHA TOWN MUSLIM JAMA-ATH MASJID NOOR AND DARAS REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SYED HUSSAIN KOYA THANGAL, AGED 57 YEARS, SON OF K.SYED ABDUL RAHIMAN TANGAL RESIDING AT SADATH MANZIL, KOTTAMKULANGARA WARD, ALAPPUZHA 688006 3. SYED HUSSAIN KOYA THNGAL AGED 57 YEARS, SON OF K. SYED ABDUL RAHIMAN THANGAL, SADATH MANZIL, OTTAMKULANGARA WARD, ALAPPUZHA-688 006. SC SRI. K.M. SAIDU MOHAMMED THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No.5749 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of February, 2009. JUDGMENT Grievance of the petitioner is mainly that orders are not passed by the first respondent on Ext.P3, an application made by them under Section 36 of the Wakf Act for registration of a Wakf. Petitioner submits that on account of delay in passing orders on Ext.P3, they filed Exts. P4 and P6 which also did not evoke any result. 2. Heard the counsel for the first respondent. According to him there are objections and therefore only after necessary enquiry can orders be passed on Ext.P3. Taking into account the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 after due enquiry. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 7 months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/