IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 489 of 2010 (S/S) Telu Ram … Petitioner Versus State of Uttaranchal and others …Respondents Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Birendra Singh Adhikari, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.C. Tiwari, the learned brief Holder for the State/respondents. The petitioner contends that as per the Government Order dated 10th September 1999, a Lekhpal cannot be transferred unless a minimum three years has elapsed. It is contended that the respondents issued an order for preparation of a list of those Lekhpals, who had worked for more than four years in a particular place and, based on that, a list was prepared in which the petitioner’s name was found and, on that basis, the petitioner has been transferred to an another area but within the same district by the impugned order. The petitioner contends that he has only worked at the place for only one and a half years and the inclusion of his name is incorrect. In this regard, the petitioner has made a representation before the authority concerned which is pending consideration. Consideration the facts and circumstances that has been brought on record, I direct the authorities concerned to decide the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order within a week from the date of the production of a certified copy of this order. In view of the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Virendra 29.06.2010