1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1286 OF 2002 Latifsha Ibrahimsha Patel & Ors. .... Applicants. V/s. Nadirsha Ismailsha Patel & Anr. .... Respondents ..... Mr.S.V.Marwadi, Advocate, for the applicants. Ms.Ameeta Kuttikrishnan i/by Ms.S.D.Khot for respondent no.1. Mrs.A.A.Mane, APP for State. ..... CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR, J. DATE : 22ND SEPTEMBER, 2009. P.C. 1. Mr.S.V.Marwadi, learned advocate for the applicants and Ms.Amita Kuttikrishnan h/f Ms.Khot, advocate for the respondent states that the applicants may avail alternate remedy of going before the revisional court and the delay condonation application will not be objected on behalf of the respondent no.1. 2. What appears from the application and the relevant contention is that copy of the police report and also the schedule appended with the original complaint is not placed on record. 2 Considering these deficiencies, it is difficult to prima facie proceed to decide the merits and moreover, Mr.Marwadi states that there were talks of settlement between the parties. 3. In view of above consession and the submission, the application is dismissed with liberty to file seek the alternate remedy as sought and the revisional court may consider the application for condonation of delay since the time spent in this Court deserves exclusion and moreover, the statement of the learned advocate for the respondent no.1. deserves to be taken into account. The revision application may be decided on its own merits and expeditiously, if so, filed within a reasonable time. (V.R.KINGAONKAR, J.)