1 H IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. C.A. No. 1266 of 2009 In FA (St) No. 4901 of 2009 VIDC v. Nirmala and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr A.B. Patil, Adv for applicant Mr K.S. Narwade, Adv for R-1 to 3 Mr D.M. Kale, AGP for R-4 & 5 Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 21.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the applicant. There is delay of 100 days caused in filing First Appeal. Learned AGP has no objection to condone the delay while learned counsel for respondents no. 1 to 3 leaves it to the discretion of the Court. On perusal of the application, it appears that delay is neither intentional nor deliberate. For the reasons stated in the application, delay condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs. 250/- to be paid to the High Court Legal Services, Sub-committee at Nagpur within two weeks from today. Application disposed of. Judge. Hsj 2