THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. No. 3875 of 2010 O r d e r: This C.R.P. is directed against the order dated 13.07.2010, passed by the VII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, in the application in I.A. No. 1322 of 2009 in O.S. No. 165 of 2005, directing the petitioner to pay thee entire arrears of rent from January, 2005 till that day on or before 02.08.2010 failing which his defence will be struck off, and further continue to pay the agreed rent at the rate of Rs.11,000/- per month regularly on or before 5the of every month. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner-tenant and the learned counsel for the respondent-landlord and perused the order under revision. As can be seen from the order under revision, the petitioner is said to have filed written statement on 16.06.2005 admitting the tenancy and his liability to pay the rent at the rate of Rs.11,000/- per month from January, 2005 onwards and that his liability to pay the arrears of rent as on the date of filing written statement was Rs.5,94,000/-. However, the petitioner on the ground that the respondent did not furnish the particulars of his bank account did not pay the same. As the petitioner did not deposit the admitted rent, the respondent filed the present application seeking to strike off the defence of the petitioner. The Court below, considering the fact that the petitioner in spite of filing written statement admitting his liability, as far back as on 16.06.2005, failed to pay the arrears of rent even though more than four years had lapsed from the date of filing thee written statement, felt it appropriate to direct the petitioner to pay the arrears of rent from January, 2005 till that day on or before 02.08.2010 else his defence would be stuck off, and continue to pay the monthly rent on or before 5th of every month, and no interference is called for therewith by this Court, particularly, when the same is a just and equitable order, passed to protect the interest of the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner did not dispute the justification of the order under revision, but prayed that the petitioner be granted instalments to pay the admitted arrears of rent. This request of the petitioner cannot be considered by this Court, and it is for the Court, which passed the order, to consider. However, the petitioner is at liberty to make his request for payment of the admitted rents in intalments before the Court below. Accordingly, the C.R.P. is disposed of. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 26th November, 2010 KSR