IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No.8829-M of 2011 Date of Order: 4.5.2011 Tarun Guglani and others .....Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. Salil Bali, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gazi Mohd. DAG, Punjab for respondent Nos.1 & 3. Mr. Man Mohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana for respondent Nos.2 & 4. Mr. R.S. Bhatia, Advocate for respondent No.5-wife. JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) Petitioner No.1-husband, who is about to secure a job on his MBA qualification, petitioner Nos.2 & 3-aged parents-in-law and petitioner No.4-unmarried sister-in-law (a qualified MBA) of respondent No.5-wife Aranyaa Guglani apprehending their arrest in a case to be lodged at the instance of respondent No.5-wife at either Ambala or in Punjab have approached this court under Section 482 Cr.P.C read with Section 438 Cr.P.C for grant of pre-arrest bail or in alternative seven days prior notice before their arrest. It is stated that petitioner No.1-Tarun Guglani and respondent No.5-Aranyaa Guglani on account of their mutual love for each other had got married on 22.1.2011 in a simple ceremony after the parents of the girl had very reluctantly acceded to the same. Soon thereafter, Aranyaa on account of her not being able to adjust with the family of her husband used to pick up quarrels and refused to stay in her matrimonial home. She is stated to have gone back to her parental home and is residing there presently. In view of the inclination from the side of the petitioners to salvage the marriage, this Court had issued notice of motion on 23.3.2011 while staying the arrest and directed the parties to be present in Court on the next date of hearing. In pursuance of the same, all the parties are present today in court. After interaction with the parties, it is crystal clear that there is no scope for salvaging the marriage since the wife-respondent No.5 Aranayaa is categoric in her stand to part ways from her husband. She states that till date no complaint has been filed from their side against the petitioners. Both the learned state counsel appearing for Punjab and Haryana respectively also state that till date, no complaint is pending against the petitioners in any of the police stations in Punjab or Haryana. Learned counsel for respondent No.5-wife on instructions from respondent No.5-Aranayaa, states that no complaint has been filed against the petitioners from the side of wife before any forum. In view of statements made by learned state counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.5-Aranyaa (wife), learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the petition at this stage. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage. May 04, 2011 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE