IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 24805 of 2002 BETWEEN: Mallika Highway Service Centre, Nagole Village, Saroornagar, Rep. By its Propreitor K. Satyanarayana, S/o. Kutumba Rao, R/o. 9-131/1, Bapuji Nagar, Nacharam Post, Hyderabad and four others. ... PETITIONER AND The State Level Coordinator, M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, 130-1, Sebastian Street, Secunderabad and three others. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondent no.4 in harassing, interfering and disturbing our peaceful possession and enjoyment of our residential portions i.e. at the House plots allotted to us in S.No.120 situated at Theegalaguttapally Village, Revenue Village of Arepally, Karimnagar Mandal and Karimnagar District and further directing the respondent No. 4 to not to harass, not to interfere and not to disturb our peaceful possession and enjoyment of the residential portions i.e. at the house site plots allotted to us in S.No.120 of Theegalaguttapally Village, Revenue Village of Arepally, Karimnagar Mandal and District and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.B.VIJAYSEN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.THOOMSRINIVAS SC FOR HPCL MR. O. MANOHAR REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous and there survives no cause for adjudication. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J August 11, 2008 DSK