^^7^/- Sin^ (? IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE: CHHA'TTISQARH AT BILASEUS w.p. &NO, 4 4-6 '9—/2006 Penaoner ^> ..-••'/^•••' .. p}o<^p'.^ ^?^y> ..tS^ .••".'.i'. ^1'" .^:"^'^^-- ^-"^•^<?<p"' ,;'-<A^:'-' Manoj Dewangan / y/o ynn jawanar Lai uewangan, Aged about 38 years, K/o Tarbahar Near Water 'l'anK, BUaspur-jC.G.) >^y^.-y >^--/" ^ Kespondents Versus -,—^t - •s'€~J '".j .,.;'" ./-s < .<• '^ \v^ State of Chhattisgarh' Through Tlie Secretary Department of Higher Education, D.K.S.Bhawan, Rapur, Dist: Raipiu--(C.G.) The Commissioner / Tribunai Welfare Department of ChJ-iatusgarb Govemraent Raipur The Commissioner,. PubUc Instruction Raipiir Division, Raipiir-(C.O.j WRIT PBTITION U/'A 226 / 227 OF THE CONST[TUTION OF INDLA -^ sr^ -S"^;Vi'J ws/ XI-HC-78 *fTH?fTSh*1|t»l 3^'^ffqRra', aiTflu'is, Rfliyy ^-:^.:^w/.ff..c.. :PR; 200 gn^?T wv> (li?^q<<iT) sn^rw R-fi+ (p[T3.nq?Tst>Hi<ti \_ TOITWHfSffsn^T bdsis 28-8-2006 Mr. Viprassn Agrawal, couns^ Mr. Sumesh Bqjqj, Sovt. advance cooy. Heard both the counsel. By this writ petition under the petitioner hcs sou9ht for a increments .and seniority on the +he light of the decision render^d Jcboipur in O.A.Mo.1452/1998 (H<| M.P. Aothers) dated 31-1-2000. The ease of the petitioner School Education Department on salary. However, later on af+er cofnj was regularized but he is not being situated teachers moved the regular pcy scole, wherein the lea^i allowed thesame. The petitioner treatment as he is also similariy si]t-u not paid any heed, therefore, he is Learned counsel for the cllowed to make a representation to the petitioner and the same pay) simiicrly situated teachers on for ths petitioner. ^dvocote for the State/respondents, on 4rticle 226/227 of the Constitution of India, dirsction to the respondents to psy the ^sis of the date of his initial appointment in by the State Administr'ative Tribunal, l^rish Chandra Singh & others vs. State of Stcfre mbde accoi^it ^iPlfepfrT tITfMt'ff IWt rf^RZTC ^srf^rsn^T pr|abat s that he was appolnted as Teacher in the 1-ion for a period of two years with fixed ipletion of two years tenure the petitioner ^iven the regular poy scale. Other similarly Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur for •ned Tribunsl vide o.-der dated 31-1-2000 several representations to accord some |t-uated Teacher, but the respondents have ^orced to file this writ petition. submits that the petitioner may be respondent No.l to 9ive similw tr-eatment scaie which has been sanctioned to other of the order of I s State Administrative pe1|itioner t<t P.T.O. XI-HC-78 +11+1^11 Sb<1|tb 3ST ^lillc.l^, ®Tn+1'16,Rfdl+iy ^j.F>,4-^< ^n; 200^ 3T(^?T4ach (^ij,^^) sn^T^irR-fieb daiT sn^r sPTRi c- c Soma y^ /s ^ STHTW flf?(T sn^r 2--1 dase sotne Tribunoi dated 31-1-2000, to whicH respondents has no objection. Ha'in9 heard learned couns41 facts and circumstances of the counse! for the petitioner dppears the petitioner is ailowed to make a period of two weeks from toda^ responderit No.l shail decide the 30 days from the date of its receij^t, the petitioner and taking into accou^it tearned State Administrative Tribuitial pstitionsr stands on the same footi^ then he be aiso sanctioned the samej With the direction aforesaidl Consequently, I.A.No.8098/^006 Parties are entitled for certil cbiilci'fl-f wrat' ff fs^S <Ri<-i;i< ^; sif^ir sn^r earned counsel appearing for the State/ for the parties and having re9ard to the ;, the iimited prayer made by learned \o be just, fair and reasonable. Therefore, •epresentation to respondent No.l within a rsising all his 9rievances and in turn, in an objective manner within a period of •, after considerin9 a!l the points raised by the order dated 31-1-2000 passed by the in O.A.No.1452/1998, and if the present cs the petitioners in O.A.No.1452/1998, pcy scale cnd seniority. the petition stands disposed of. also stands disposed of. ^ied copy of this order. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo P.T.O.