IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17597 of 2011 GUDDU KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2, 27.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 408/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner and his brother Raju Kumar who is not petitioner before this court is that they took two auto rickshaws of the informant for earning their livelihood but subsequently they refused to give rent amount by saying that they have purchased the same. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the auto rickshaws were purchased by the petitioner’s father from the informant after payment of consideration amount of Rs. 1,60,000/- but transfer was not made by the informant for which the complaint case no. 1090 of 2010 was filed by father of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts, let 2 the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 488 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)