IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1297 of 2008 RUNTI DEVI & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.5.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No.125 of 2006 registered under sections 307, 323 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that on perusal of the allegations made in the First Information Report, it would appear that the allegations are omnibus and moreover, the allegation of firing is not attributed to these petitioners. It is further submitted that, as a matter of fact, the present case was lodged in retaliation of refusal of prayer for injunction in Title Partition Suit no.8 of 2004 between the parties. Notwithstanding the above, it is further submitted that the parties have amicably settled their disputes as would appear from the petition filed before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in the said criminal case vide Annexure 2 to the petition. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners deserve to be granted anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, and on perusal of the allegations made in the First Information Report as 2 well as the averments made in the petition as also the materials brought on the record, it is directed that petitioner no.1 Runti Devi, Petitioner no.2 Kaushal Singh and petitioner no.3 Satya Narain Singh, in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No.125 of 2006 within a period of three weeks, be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)