IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13597 of 2009 Between: Gaddam Pochaiah S/o. Venkataiah R/o. 1-1-100/4, Mahalaxmi Nagar, Jagitial, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh Through Station House Officer, Medipally Police Station Medipalli, Karimnagar District. 2 Ashaiah, Sub Inspecotr of Police, Medipally Police Station Medipalli, Karimnagar District. 3 Rachamalla Devaiah S/o. Rajan Govindaram Vilage, Medipalli Mandal, Karimnagar District. 4 Byra Gangarajan S/o. Yerraiah R/o. Govindaram Vilage, Medipalli Mandal, Karimnagar District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.GIRI KRISHNA Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2:AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that at the instance of respondent Nos.3 and 4, respondent No.2 has been interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner. Heard Sri P.Girikrishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2. The petitioner, who was sitting in his brother’s telephone booth, came into acquaintance with one Tummala Shankar, who acted as a broker for sending people to gulf countries. According to the petitioner, respondent Nos.3 and 4, who were evidently cheated by the said Shankar after collecting money with the promise to send them abroad, approached respondent No.2 with a complaint against the said Shankar and that respondent No.2 has been forcing the petitioner to disclose the whereabouts of the said Shankar. The petitioner claims that he has nothing to do with the said Shankar and respondent No.2 cannot violate his privacy and interfere in his life and personal liberty. In the counter-affidavit filed by him, respondent No.2 inter alia denied the allegations made by the petitioner. He stated that he never called the petitioner and harassed him at any point of time. He further stated that as of now, no complaint whatsoever was received from either respondent Nos.3 and 4 or the petitioner. The stand taken by respondent No.2 in the counter-affidavit is placed on record and the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail his remedy in accordance with law in the event respondent No.2 interferes with his life and personal liberty in future. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP.No.17709 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 20th JULY, 2009. kvni