IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32396 of 2011 Jimadar Das, S/o Baleshwar Das Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 25.10.2011 The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail as he apprehends his arrest in Mahnar P.S. Case No. 109 of 2011 for the offence alleged under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been alleged in the First Information Report that on 23.06.2011 the informant after closing his sweets shop found his splendor plus motor cycle bearing no BR31F0427 is missing and accordingly filed the instant First Information Report naming three persons including the petitioner therein. It further transpires that with the help of some local persons he was able to catch Rajesh Kumar, one of the co-accused. It appears that thereafter Rajesh Kumar has given a confessional statement naming the present petitioner as the person who has allegedly committed the offence of theft of the motor cycle. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has been falsely implicated in this case and in fact he has not been committed theft as alleged. He further states that the co-accused namely Rajesh Kumar and Digvijay Singh has both been granted bail by this court and as such similar benefit should be granted to this petitioner as well. Considering the fact that Rajesh Kumar has named the present petitioner as the person responsible for the theft, this court is not inclined to accept the bail prayer of the petitioner at this stage, and as such this bail petition stands rejected. Considering that the petitioner is in custody since 25.06.2011, he will be at liberty to renew his prayer for regular bail after three months before the court below, which will be considered on its own merits. Fahad. ( Vikash Jain, J. )