IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3167 of 2010 ***** 1. MUKESH PASWAN S/O SHRI SINGHESHWAR PRASAD R/O VILL.- HAPLAGANJ, P.S.- MUFFASIL KATIHAR, DISTT.- KATIHAR. …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS DEPTT. GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE COMMISSIONER PURNEA DIVISION, PURNEA 3. COLLECTOR KATIHAR 4. ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR KATIHAR 5. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER KATIHAR 6. CIRCLE OFFICER KATIHAR SADAR, DISTT.- KATIHAR 7. OFFICER INCHARGE (S.H.O. ) P.S.- KATIHAR TOWN, DISTT.- KATIHAR. …. …. Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. H.S. Himkar, Advocate Mr. A. Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Assistant Counsel to Government Pleader-II ------------ 2. 3.3.2010. Heard Mr. H.S.Himkar along with Mr. A.Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State. The only grievance in this public interest petition that though the orders pertaining to removal of encroachment have been passed by the statutory authorities as per law, yet the same are not being given effect to. Having heard the learned counsel for the - 2 - parties, we are only inclined to observe, if the orders have attained finality and there is no interdiction by any forum the same shall be given effect to as orders are not to remain paper tigers but have to have the roaring effect. With the aforesaid observation the writ petition stands disposed of. Needless to emphasise the said ‘roaring effect’, in its interpretation, it would encapsulate ‘action in promptitude’. Pawan/ (Dipak Misra, CJ) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J)