^l ^ jla Bend e<r IN THS HIGH COURT O? JUDZCATURE; ^T BZL^SPUR (CG) WRI'i? PETZTZON N0. /^/ ©1?2005 BgTWBE^r 1» Gokul jpm som^ aged about 50 years^ son of Magru l^m SDm^ afc present work.ing as a Assista.nt rEBaoh©r^Primary School KapaspaM Narhazpur District Kanle©r (03). 2» Hlra singh NQt-am ^ag©dabout 45 years S/b Titeran I^m ' tam|; at presen'te-^o.x^ing as a'Assistant. l^acner, Primary School Sh^ntera^Narharpur Distrlct Kanker (QQ)o l0> .....-•;1V(^< a-^ ^.^•:'""v^3^' 5?'fi:;'>-^ ^•^t-'"*l^-r; "rs'f^.<-^OV PBri3:TlONBRS o ft H-© 'y^ 1» 3he State of Gihtettisgarh^ Through the Secretary B^artmen-t of rcri.bal f^lfare^ ©•K»S»ghawan^ i pur (03) ^ 2»; .The DixBatDr^' Sribal Wslfare itepartmen'fc^ Chhattlsgarh^ Eaipar <i ^ ^ssistenfe QOCTnissioner/ Tribal TAjBlfare SBpartm^t^: mnker Dis-fcric't Kanlcer (co)o ^ ^:'^ ^y(r--4»L cpllectorr KSnlcer," E&strict Kank©r (CG). y<^^ ^—-^--^—^- -^^ • ^ ©istrictB3ucation Officer^ Kanker, lAstrict I&nker. , 6. Bist.riGt E3dueation Officer, Bhamtari^ Dis.trie-t Ehamtari. 7, Bloak Eduaation ©fficer,Nagri Distriet ©naratari (CG). !®SPON©ENTS- WRIT PE'Z'ITION UNDSR ARTZCLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTZTUIION . ©pZNDIA 5'OR ZS3UMTCE OF ^ WRIrP IN THS N.ATURE O? MANDM^US PSOHIBZIION^ eSS'23:ORAR2 ETC ©RANY Ol'HBR DIRECTIQN OR ORDER TO FK) JUSSZCE EVT TI-®MATTER XI-HC—78 'S^ ^N)^|^, y(ii-H<i<c, I®idra(|,< ^.M»'K^Y/^^ ^is*i^l %,*jjcb " 7 •^200 Sn^T1E^^ (<^^^) ^H^f 1°R7 "f^RN? "cT^T 3?!^T ^F^NF ^^. •^ 'x' <7— ^WR^Nsn^ 25-01-2005 Shri Vishnu Koshta, tearned Heard. The petitioner being aggri< respondents in not relieving the 26-08-2003 as per Annexure P-1, hs Learned oounsel for the pet| Annexure P-1, the petitioner madej reiieving to the place where he has| considered as yet. i have heard the counsel for| Since the order of annexurei not been complied with by the res{ would be just and proper to direct tj' of annexure P-1 and reiieve the p| date of production of copy ofthisor^ Ordered accordingiy. With the observations madNabove In view'of this order M.WjF disposed of. ob^?<rt4l^ ^w<rii ^T fet^ {i^i^K ^s^T^n^r ^ounse! for the petitioner. aved by the inaction on the part of the letitioner in compliance of the order dated isfiiedthispetition. . tioner submits that after issuance of order of a representatidn to the respondents for his been transferred but the same has. not been the petitioner on admission. P-1 issuedtothe petitioner 0^26.8.2003 has ?ondents till date,! am of the opinion that it ie respondents to comply with the said order rtitioner within a period of 15 days from the ier before them. the petition is disposed of. P.No. 48/2005and I.A.No. 153/2005 stand Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge