F RPI (y ./-- ^ IN THE COURT OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION N0.8D.^./2006 PETITIONER ^•'\A« ....ft^^tmaram S/o Shri Sadhuram , Aged about f^'f^.!' ..^ yearworking as Gangmanbepartment 7 ?..-l"^f-!p2".••••"'" of P-w-D.R/o Pachpedi, Tah. Sarangarh y^€-ff..y Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ^-^y^ RESPONDENTS ^f^ •T-~ ^?\ VERSUS ' 1.3tate of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) ^2. Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) / 3. Superintending Engineer, PublicWorksDepartment, BilaspurDivision, Distt.Bilaspur(C.G.) 4. Executive Engineer, PublicWorks Department, Dist. Raigarh(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AWRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. ORANYOTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER X1-HC.22 7^ ':qTrii?Tq, dTtiy'1'i, [««niyy, 3(T^?T XT^? ...'^:f..,g53L/.S..6 WvWW^ " "~ """J"""V^ fq^g' 3VKWI f^ns; 3fKy WqWHfel g'1 •<^ K^ '^ 3d^i ^<neiT'I(B?T 1-3-2006 Shri Sameer Sehar, counsel fi Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Application to- urgent hearing Heard. qi!<l[cl^1"1 HlH(TlT ^ f^^l ^f^+^R. '^STPm 311^1 t>rthe petitioner. Advocate for the State. lisallowed. The petitiorer has filed t()is petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of Indie on the ground his servi&es have nct been rsgulariz^d. Counssi fortee petitioner sutj since more than 25 '/ears. He has f dated 3-9-2002. tt s pointed out tll made collectively a-d the same is p^ have been regi :hat even after completing 25 years of service, mits that the petitioner is serving as Gangman ted copy 6f Service Book. He submits that the petitioner is entitlec to be regulariz^d under the Gangmen's Service Rules, 1996 Annexure P-2 and Circulars Annekure P-3 dated* 9-4-2003 and Annexure P-4 at representations as per Annexure P-6 v;ere snding. It is also pointed out that some persons uisrted. Learned Stas counsel pointe^ petitioner is pendinsand the same Vitl Having consriered and withcjut case, in the opinion of this Coyrt, fo| direction is giyen tc the petitioner tcj his grievances befo-e the responde( or the petition an: this order, wj representation beins filed, the comfletent the same on its ow merits in accotdance within three months from the date made clear that ff any grievance available under the aw. With the afo^said observati Certified};op_i as per rules. df out that the representation submitted by the li be considered and decided. expres^ing any opinion on the merits of the the present, ehds ofjustice wi!! be served il a make a detailed representation afresh raising jit no" 2 - Engineer-iri-Chief aiong with s copy jthin three weeks from today, and cn such authority of-the respondents shalt decide with law as early as possible preferably receipt/ produetion of the representation. It is ijemains, the petitioner may avail the remedy, io(is, this petition stands disposed of. Sdf- Fakhruddin Judge ;TN. i 1( o •-.j 1