IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.23647 of 2011 Date of Decision : December 20, 2011. The Mahalaxmi Cooperative Transport Society Ltd. .....Petitioner versus The State Transport Controller, Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.R.S.Kundu, Additional AG, Haryana. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.R.S.Kundu, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. The solitary grievance of the petitioner is that the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Haryana, which is headed by an officer in the rank of District & Sessions Judge, has passed an order dated 28.3.2011 (Annexure P-1) granting one additional permit to the petitioner-Society to operate on route No.10 in District Yamuna Nagar. However, the said order CWP No.23647 of 2011 [2] is not being implemented by the respondents. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the reasons assigned by a Division Bench of this Court in its order dated July 28, 2006 passed in CWP No.11468 of 2006 (Highway Bus Service Regd., Patiala versus State Transport Commissioner, Punjab and another) this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to implement the order dated 28.3.2011 (Annexure P-1) passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Haryana, provided that there is no legal impediment in implementation thereof and/or the same has attained finality. The needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Dasti. December 20, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE