IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40783 of 2007 1. BHAIRO RAI 2. Baiju Rai 3. Ram Ekbal Rai 4. Manoj Rai 5. Shambhu Rai 6. Shiv Kumar Rai 7. Kishori Rai 8. Bachchu Rai … … Petitioners Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. Bhikhainia Devi … Opp. Parties ----------- 4. 5.2.2010 This petition appears filed under a wrong provision of law. The petitioners seek a direction for further enquiry on account of framing of charge for the wrong offence. There is specific provision under Section 398 of the Cr. P.C. It is well known that provision of Section 482 of the Cr. P.C. could not be utilized to bypass a specific jurisdiction created under the Cr. P.C. This petition is dismissed as not maintainable under Section 482 Cr. P.C. If the petitioners still have any reason to assail the impugned order, they may file an appropriate petition. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)