IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellanious No.35795 of 2008 ============================================= 1. Nagendra Rai . 2. Surendra Rai. Both resident of village- Lachhu Chappar, P.S. Chanpatia, Distt- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party 2 14-07-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the evidence of the five witnesses did not disclose the parentage address of either Surendra Rai or Nagendra Rai yet the learned Additional Public Prosecutor filed an application for issuance of summons giving the parentage address of these two persons. It would be apparent that the parentage and address of these two persons, who have been summoned under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. has been taken by the Additional Public Prosecutor from the case diary which discloses the name of these two persons along with the name of their parents and address. I, therefore, find no ground to interfere in the order impugned. This application is dismissed. Md. Ibrarul/- ( Sheema Ali Khan, J)