Crl. Misc. No. M-20026 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH * * * * * Crl. Misc. No. M-20026 of 2009 Date of decision : October 29, 2009 * * * * * Narender Bhardwaj and others ............Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ...........Respondents * * * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH * * * * * Present: Mr. N.K Sood, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Girotra, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Satyender Bhadana, Advocate for respondent no.2. * * * * * JORA SINGH, J. Narender Bhardwaj and others filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of FIR No.155 dated 8.8.2005 registered under Sections 498-A, 406, 506 IPC at Police Station Sector 31, Faridabad on the basis of compromise. Notice of motion was issued to the respondents. Respondent no.1 filed reply to the effect that after investigation, final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C was submitted in Crl. Misc. No. M-20026 of 2009 2 the Court. Respondent no.2 appeared through counsel. Counsel for respondent no.2 stated that respondent no.2-complainant was married with Narender Bhardwaj but due to temperamental differences, parties had decided to dissolve marriage by way of mutual consent. Petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was instituted and the same was accepted. Annexure P-2 is the copy of the joint statement of the parties. Annexure P-3 is the copy of the judgment dated 19.7.2008. Counsel for the petitioners says that this is a case of matrimonial dispute amongst the parties. Respondent no.2 was married with petitioner no.1. But, due to temperamental differences, respondent no.2 and petitioner no.1 failed to adjust and decided to dissolve marriage by way of mutual consent. Petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was instituted. Statement of respondent no.2 and petitioner no.1 was recorded. Ultimately petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was accepted. Minor son, Harshit alias Ajay is to remain in the custody of Anita. State counsel and counsel for the complainant stated that in view of the compromise, he has no objection if the aforesaid FIR is quashed. Anita had married with petitioner no.1. But due to certain temperamental differences, there was a family dispute. Dispute was settled. Petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was instituted. Ultimately, after recording the statements of husband Crl. Misc. No. M-20026 of 2009 3 and wife, petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was accepted. Annexure P-3 is the copy of the judgment. In view of the compromise, no reason to direct the petitioner to face trial. After compromise, parties are to reside peacefully and there is no chance of further litigation. In view of all discussed above as per compromise amongst the parties, present petition is accepted. FIR No.155 dated 8.8.2005 is quashed. October 29, 2009 ( JORA SINGH ) ritu JUDGE