IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 29 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 29 OF 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 29 OF 2005 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.586 OF 2001 WRIT PETITION NO.586 OF 2001 WRIT PETITION NO.586 OF 2001 C.K. Mehra & Ors. ...Petitioners V/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Ors. ...Respondents Ms.Nanavati i/b. D.H. Nanavati for Petitioners. CORAM : A.S. AGUIAR, J. CORAM : A.S. AGUIAR, J. CORAM : A.S. AGUIAR, J. DATED : MARCH 18, 2005. DATED : MARCH 18, 2005. DATED : MARCH 18, 2005. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. Learned Advocate for the petitioners contends that there is contempt of this Court’s order dated 27th August, 2003 (Coram : Khandeparkar, J.) directing the respondent no.4 herein i.e. respondent no.3 in Writ Petition No.586 of 2002 wherein the said order is passed, to hear the petitioners and dispose of the application for fixation of the amount of repair cess within four weeks from the date of the order and within outer limit of twelve weeks. 2. Learned Advocate for the petitioners points out that the petitioners have been heard on 6th, 10th and - 2 - 19th January, however, thereafter no order has been passed by respondent no.4. 3. In the circumstance, respondent no.4 is directed to dispose of the said application, if not disposed of, pending before him within two weeks from today. Learned Advocate for the petitioners does not press the petition against respondent no.1. Petition against respondent no.1 to stand dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. With the above order, petition to stand disposed of with no order as to costs. (A.S. Aguiar, J.) (A.S. Aguiar, J.) (A.S. Aguiar, J.)