1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.1878 OF 2005 Phonographic Performance Ltd. ...Plaintiff. vs. Provogue (India) Ltd. ...Defendant. --- Mr.S.S.Purohit i/b. Medialexicon, for Plaintiff. Mr.R.P.Pandey i/b. Santosh B.G.& Associates, for Defendant. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 11th December,2006.. P.C.:- 1. The learned Counsel appearing for defendant places on record licence granted by the plaintiff in favour of the defendant for the period from 1.9.2006 upto 31.8.2007. It is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The learned Counsel appearing for defendant states that if the defendant wants to use the place for 2 playing the sound recording for the future period that is the period after 31.8.2007, the defendant will apply for licence with the plaintiff and will play the sound recording only after obtaining appropriate licence from the plaintiff. The statement is accepted. 2. In view of this statement and the document at “X”, the suit becomes infructuous and is disposed of as such. Refund of Court fees as per rules. ---