1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7316 OF 2009 1) Gitanjali Digambar Tikore, R/o- At Post-Sawargaon, Tq-Mukhed, Dist-Nanded, 2) Tejaswini Sainath Jorgulwar, R/o- At Post-Mukhed, Tq-Mukhed, Dist-Nanded, 3) Bhagyashri Shivaji Shinde, R/o-Mukhed, Tq-Mukhed, Dist-Nanded, 4) Pratibha Balasaheb Kumthekar, R/o- Mukhed, Tq-Mukhed, Dist-Nanded, 5) Dhondiba Dattatraya Jamjal, R/o- At Post-Sawargaon, Tq-Mukhed, Dist-Nanded, 6) Varsha Shivaji Musande R/o- At Post-Sawargaon, Tq-Mukhed, Dist-Nanded. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Secondary and Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others. ...RESPONDENTS. 2 ... Shri.E.S. Murge Advocate for Petitioners. Smt.R.K. Laddha, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Shri.V.R. Sonwalkar Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.U. CHANDWAL, JJ. DATE : 5TH DECEMBER, 2009. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners. 2. We have verified answer-sheets of all the Petitioners. The performance of the Petitioners' in H.S.C. examination of March, 2009 was cancelled and they were debarred to appear in the next examination of October, 2009. 3. After verification of the answer-sheets with the other answer sheets, we direct that the Board may recheck/verify the answer sheets of Petitioner No.1 - Gitanjali Digambar Tikore and Petitioner No.3 - Bhagyashri Shivaji Shinde, by appointing an independent moderator than the one who had earlier 3 examined the answer sheets. The Board, thereafter shall pass appropriate orders, after examining the answer sheets afresh on its own merits and communicate the same to the Petitioners. The Board shall complete this exercise within four weeks from today. The Petition to the extent of the Petitioner No.1 and Petitioner No.3 is disposed of. 3. In case of the remaining Petitioners, we have verified their answer sheets. We do not find that the case is made out by these Petitioners for interference by this Court in exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction. The Petition, therefore, in respect of these Petitioners i.e. Petitioner Nos. 2, 4, 5 and 6 is dismissed. [K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] asb/DEC09/wp7316.09