IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 4813 of 2008 Between: Mr.B.Mallesh S/o.Venkaiah R/o.7-95 Srinagar Village, Maheswaram Mandal Ranga Reddy District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Proh & ExciseSuperintendent, Hyderabad, Govt of AP at Nampally, Hyderabad 2 The Commissioner of Proh & Excise, Govt of AP at Nampally, Hyderabad 3 The Director of Proh & Excise, Government of AP at Nampally, Hyderabad 4 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad, Govt of AP at Basheerbagh ,Hyderabad 5 The Proh & Excise Inspector , SHO, Ameerpet Govt of AP., Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the notice in Cr.No.B1/772/2006/ESH dated 28.2.2008 of the 1st respondent as without jurisdiction contrary to alw, violation of principles of natural justice illegal, an arbitrary, and set aside the same and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.AMARNATH GOUD THODUPUNURI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 4813 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: The cause in the writ petition no longer survives. The writ petition is filed by the licensee of Sri Sri Pedamma Wines challenging the order of the first respondent dated 28-02-2008 directing the petitioner to shift his business to alternative premises as the present licensed premises is causing nuisance and obstruction to the V.I.P. convoys. This Court granted an interim suspension of the impugned order on 07-03-2008. The period of license was over by 30-06- 2008. It is stated by the learned Government Pleader for Excise that the petitioner is not a licensee for the current year commencing from 01-07-2008 as he was unsuccessful at the auction. In the light of the above developments, no adjudication is required in this writ petition. It is accordingly dismissed as ‘infructuous’. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 02-07-2008 Pvks/*