-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF OF OF MOTION NO.1031 OF 2004 MOTION NO.1031 OF 2004 MOTION NO.1031 OF 2004 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.1012 OF 2004 NO.1012 OF 2004 NO.1012 OF 2004 Smt Meena G. Shukla and anr. ... Plaintiffs v/s Sandeep D. Mahatre ... Defendant Mr P.S. Shah for Plaintiffs. Mr H.R. Pawar for Defendant. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 20TH DECEMBER 2004. -2- P.C. :- 1. This is a notice of motion taken out by the plaintiffs. Heard learned counsel for the plaintiffs and the defendant. Perused the orders dated 6th April 2004 and the order dated 18th August 2004 passed by this Court. The plaintiffs have not filed any reply. The defendant did not comply with the order dated 6th April 2004, therefore by order dated 18th August 2004, ad-interim order in terms of prayer clause (b) was granted. The defendant, though appearing, had chosen to file no affidavit in reply and the learned counsel for defendant cannot say anything more except that the defendant and the plaintiffs were carrying on negotiations. In views of the conduct of the defendant and the record, in my opinion, it would be appropriate to confirm the ad-interim order dated 18th August 2004. It is accordingly so ordered. Notice of motion is disposed off. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Personal Secretary of this Court as true copy. . Certified copy expedited.