1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.02.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1817 of 2011 R.Devi ... Petitioner Vs. State Represented by 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District. In Cr.No.395 of 2010 ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to transfer the investigation in Cr.No.395 of 2010 dated 04.08.2010 pending on the file of the 2nd respondent to some other agencies. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram For Respondent : Mr.L.Murugan, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER This petition has been filed seeking to transfer the investigation in Cr.No.395 of 2010 dated 04.08.2010 pending on the file of the 2nd respondent to some other agencies. 2. Heard Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Mr.L.Murugan, learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondents. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is the sister of the deceased woman Geetha and the said deceased was married to one Narayanan, five years ago, he died in a suspicious manner on 03.08.2010. He would further submit that the case has been registered by the second respondent police in Crime No.395 of 2010 under Section 174 Cr.P.C. and thereafter it has been altered into one under Section 306 Cr.P.C. It is also submit that there is no progress in the investigation and it is still pending without any improvement and no charge sheet has been filed so far. He would therefore request the Court that the investigation may be transferred from the file of the second respondent to any other competent and independent investigating agency like CBCID and suitable direction may be issued for transfer as well as completion of investigation. 4. Learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) would submit in his argument that after the registration of this case in Crime No.395 of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2010, witnesses have been examined and the investigation is on progress and there is no lacking in the investigation. He would further submit in his argument that the investigation would be seriously conducted and in a short time, the charge sheet will be filed. 5. Considering the submission made by both parties, this Court could see that the case has been registered against the husband of the deceased woman and the investigation is offing. According to the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) the investigation will be over within a short span of time and the charge sheet will be filed. 6. In view of the submission made by learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), I do not find any infirmity or malafide on the part of the second respondent in conducting the investigation. However, the second respondent is directed to continue the investigation and examine all the witnesses required for establishing case of the complainant if prima facie case available and to file charge sheet within a span of three months time. The first respondent is directed to supervise the said investigation and issue suitable direction then and there for the expeditious completion of the investigation. 7. With the aforesaid direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Vsm SR : 09.03.2011 : 2p/4c Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1817 of 2011 14.02.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/