HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.6060 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioners are A-6 to A-8 in crime No.85 of 2008 of Penumur P.S. registered for the offences under Sections 366-A and 323 IPC. The accusation made against the petitioners is that they along with the other accused kidnapped P.Ramya, aged 16 years, daughter of the de facto complainant for the purpose of marriage with Subba Reddy, A-1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent- State. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that A-3 to A-5 have been granted anticipatory bail and the case of the petitioners stands on the same footing as that of A-3 to A-5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the petition on the ground that specific accusations have been made against the petitioners, therefore, the accused do not deserve for granting anticipatory bail. The crime is of the year 2008. Police completed the investigation and filed the charge sheet. The petitioners approached the I Additional Sessions Judge, Chittoor, for grant of anticipatory bail. Their application ended in dismissal on 24-04-2009. Undisputedly, the police completed the investigation and filed charge sheet on 12-05- 2009. The committal Court has taken the charge sheet on file as P.R.C.No.40 of 2009 on the file of the IV Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chittoor. N.B.Ws. must have been pending execution. At this distance of time, I am of the view that the petitioners do not deserve for grant of anticipatory bail. However, they are at liberty to surrender themselves before the committal Court and move an application for seeking regular bail. In which event, the Court may consider the bail application as expeditiously as possible, preferably on the same day, keeping in view of the fact that some of the other accused being on bail. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. ________________ August 18, 2009 KVR