IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.10 of 2003 PANCHANAN SINGH son of Shri Sheo Paras Singh, Red. Of village- Jagta, P.S. Chandi, Dist. Bhojpur…. Petitioner. Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Director, Secondary Education Bihar, Patna. 3. The Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Education Officer, Bhojpur. 5. The Headmaster, High School, Jagta, Bhojpur… … Respondents. ----------- 3. 02.07.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. In the opinion of this Court, there is no apparent error on the face of record so as to give any prospect for considering the prayer of review of the petitioner. From the order dated 22.8.2002, it would be absolutely clear that the appointment of the petitioner was rank illegal appointment without following the prescribed procedure and statutory rules. This Court, therefore, had rightly come to the conclusion that such appointment was in teeth of Articles 14 and 16 was void ab initio. Much water has flown down in the river Ganges since the order dated 22.8.2002 sought to be reviewed had been passed inasmuch as this aspect has now been settled by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka & ors. 2 Vs. Uma Devi (3) Ors., reported in 2006(4) SCC 1 and also in the case of State of Bihar vs. Upendra Narayan Singh and Ors., reported in 2009(5) SCC 65 and Md. Ashif & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors, reported in 2010 (2) PLJR 156(SC). In fact, all these aspects in a similar case has also been decided by this court Yesterday by an order dated 1.7.2010 in CWJC No. 11930 of 2002 (Kumari Sheela Singh & Ors vs. State of Bihar & Ors.). That being so, this court does not find any merit in this review application and the same is hereby dismissed. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)