IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 14 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.11.2010 State of Haryana .. Petitioner v. Sunil Kumar and another .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana for the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Walia, Advocate for the respondents. ... Rajesh Bindal J. In the present petition filed by the State, the challenge is to the order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jind, whereby in a revision filed by the respondents against the order framing charge, the same was set aside. The proceedings arise out of a matrimonial dispute. The parties had indulged themselves in other litigation as well. During the pendency of the aforesaid petition, in COCP No. 2062 of 2009 –Sunil Devi @ Babli v. Sunil Kumar, decided by a separate order passed today, the parties settled their dispute and in terms thereof, the entire litigation between them was disposed of as compromised. Criminal Misc. No. M-48887 of 2007 filed by the wife against the husband and his father discharging them in the criminal case was also dismissed as withdrawn. Considering the aforesaid facts where the entire litigation between the parties which arose out of a matrimonial dispute stood settled, I do not find any reason to continue with the present petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. ( Rajesh Bindal ) Judge 16.11.2010 mk