IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3441 of 2010 Date of Decision: August 16, 2010 Satpal. …Petitioner Versus Rajiv Kumar and others. …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH. 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Naresh Prabhakar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that present petition be dismissed as withdrawn. However, direction be issued to the learned Rent Controller to decide the question of tenant-landlord relationship between the parties and also to decide as to whether the petitioner was inducted as tenant by Jagat Ram rightly or not and the learned Rent Controller also to decide the validity of the payment made by the petitioner to Sh. Jagat Ram. C.R. No. 3441 of 2010 Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that any observation made by the learned Rent Controller in the impugned order shall not prejudice the learned Rent Controller at the time of finally deciding the case. The learned Rent Controller is expected to decide the question of tenant- landlord relationship between the parties in view of the fact that the petitioner is denying the relationship. The learned Rent Controller shall also decide as to whether the petitioner was inducted as tenant in the disputed premises by Sh. Jagat Ram and the petitioner has paid rent to Sh. Jagat Ram who has inducted the petitioner as tenant. The learned Rent Controller shall also decide as to whether Smt. Shiv Devi was the original owner of the property who has sold the property to the respondents as per the case set up by the respondent. Disposed of accordingly. August 16, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2