IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.9886 of 2007 Date of decision: 6.7.2007 Sumit Patial. -----Petitioner Vs. Punjab State Education Baord and another. -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. Manohar Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. ----- ORDER: This petition seeks a direction for production of answer- sheets of the petitioner with a view to order re-evaluation and also to enable the petitioner to see the same. Case of the petitioner is that he is a brilliant student and passed matriculation examination after obtaining 72% marks. He obtained 62.2% marks in 10+1 in the year 2004. He appeared for 10+2 examination in March 2005, but found that he secured marks which were less than his expectation. He applied for re-checking, but the result remained the same. He submitted a representation on 13.7.2005, but finding no response, he continued to represent till 20.09.2006. Finally, he filed the present petition on 5.7.2007. CWP. No.9886 of 2007 We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the petition. Neither in the petition nor otherwise, any rule permitting re-evaluation has been shown. Re-evaluation cannot be sought merely because candidate finds that marks awarded are not upto his expectation. In the present case, the writ petition itself has been filed two years after declaration of the result. Mere pendency of repeated representations, alleged to have been made, cannot be a ground for filing this petition after a gross delay. We do not find any merit in this petition, the same is dismissed. ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ) JUDGE July 06, 2007 ( AJAI LAMBA ) ashwani JUDGE 2