IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.612 of 2009 ***** Ranjan Kumar @ Kranti @ Judge, son of Rajendra Paswan, resident of village- Anand Bazar Turhatoli, P.S. Danapur, District-Patna. …. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar …. …. Opposite party ----------- 4. 6.7.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The very narration in the F.I.R. shows that a well planned conspiracy has been hatched and executed by the extremists when four constables of S.A.P. along with an A.S.I. were gunned down, which led to the filing of the present case. it is stated by learned counsel representing the petitioner that the petitioner has been taken in custody on the basis of confessional statement and there is no material as such by virtue of which he is not entitled to be enlarged on bail. Learned A.P.P. representing the State, however, submits that even if the confessional statement aspect is not taken into consideration but it has come during investigation that the petitioner’s participation was very much there in the crime and the petitioner has given a detailed narration as to how the plan was made and executed, which is corroborated by further investigation into the incident. Looking at the serious crime which was committed by the outlawed members of an organisation, the petitioner does not deserve any leniency in the matter and he cannot be given the benefit of doubt at this stage. His prayer for bail, therefore, stands rejected. In the matter of this kind the respondent State authorities would be well advised to expedite - 2 - trial of the case. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)