IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2358 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:01.06.2011. D.C.Jain ...Petitioner Versus Lt. Col. Baldev Arora (Retd.) ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. N.C.Kinra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anand Chhibbar, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. The tenant is in revision against order of the Courts below by which he has been ordered to vacate the demised premises on the ground of personal necessity. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the landlord is an old man of 84 years and is unable to start an industrial unit in the demised premises. In this regard, the Courts below have held that the landlord is not required himself to be physically indulged in operating an industrial unit which can be run with the engagement of the person of his choice, therefore, I am not convinced that merely because of the fact that he is an old man, the landlord cannot raise requirement of the demised premises for his personal necessity. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the present revision petition and as such, the same is hereby dismissed, however, without any order as to costs. June 01, 2011. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE