IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40729 of 2009 RAMESH RAI @ RAMESHWAR RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 8.1.2010. Heard. The petitioner was on police bail as such this petition for anticipatory bail is not maintainable and is dismissed. It is too well known to be pointed out that once a person is on bail, either granted by the police or by a court, no order, ex-parte in nature so as to cancelling the bond of an accused is to be passed. Besides, if the court is inclined to take a view different from the police in the matters of granting bail, then it shall have to act as per the recognized and established principles on cancellation and that too when it is served notice upon the accused that it desired to re-hear him on allowing him to continue on bail. I believe that the court below shall stick to the stated set principles and act accordingly as and when the petitioner surrenders in the court below, i.e., C.J.M., Muzaffarpur in connection with Hathauri P.S.Case No.03 of 2005 and pray for regular bail. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )