IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.19843 of 2009 MITHILESH CHOUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 10.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The informant stated that Jaglal Chaudhary and his brother Mahavir Chaudhary and two persons came to his house with 8 to 10 unknown persons. The informant further states that Jaglal Chaudhary had filed Complaint Case No. 124 of 2006 in which he was advocate. The aforesaid Jaglal Chaudhary, Sarjug Chaudhary enquired from him as to how accused persons of the aforesaid case got bail. Thereafter, on the order of Jaglal Chaudhary this petitioner assaulted the informant with Chura which hit over his eyes. It is alleged that Jaglal Chaudhary and Sarjug Chaudhary snatched his chain and wrist watch. Learned counsel further submits that Jaglal Chaudhary has been granted bail and all the injuries are simple in nature. Petitioner is in custody since four months. In view of the nature of allegation, I am not 2 inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after four months. kundan (S. P. Singh, J.)