@ MitzyaL IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 1 WPsNo. H$"?‘ /200& (3.8.) ETITIONER A” {2:13. Kaushik, S/o shri DR. Kaushik, aged about 46 years, R/o Padav Para, Kota, Bilaspur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretary , Education Department , D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Director of public Instruction Pensionbada Raipur (C.G.) a \ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22%OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA p @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR w. P. (s) No. 1157 of 200/ Pe'fi'l'ioner : B.P. Knushik Versus Respondents Sfm of Chha‘rfisgarh é another Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sa‘rish K. Agnihotri. Mr. Kumnresh Tiwari, Advocate for The pefifioner. Smf. Anju Ahuju, Depu'ry Govemmenf Advocate for *he Sfafe/respondenfs. O R D E R (Passed on fhis 28’” Day of February, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for 'rhe pe'ri‘l'ioner wbmifs 1ha+ 'I'he pefi‘rioner is working as Assisfan'f Teacher. The pefifioner obfained B. Ed. Examinafian cer'fifica'l'e in *h‘e year 1992, on his own expenses. learned counsel appearing for The pe1’i'rioner submi'l’s fha‘r fhe ques‘l'ion involved, herein as‘i’o whether fhe feacher, who obi'ained B. Ed. Examina'l'ion Cerfificafe on his own expenses is enfifled +o iwo advance increments. According 1'o learned counsel for fhe pefi'iioner, fhe pefifioner is enfifled fo mo advance incremen-rs in view of fhe decision of fhis Cour-1' in The case of Yashwarri Kumor Bharadwoj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and ano‘i’her- {2006 (H) MPJR-CG 96}. This Cour'i in ihe case of Yashwan'i Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and anoiher (Supra), came 'l'o fhe conclusion 'l'hai’ 1he feachers, who had obfained B. Ed. /B.T.I. Examination Cerfifica‘le on 1heir own. @ expenses, are covered by the circular dn'l’ed 24.12.98 issued by fhe Sfufe Govemmenf of Madhya Pmdesh. Learned counsel foi' fhe pe‘tifioner furfher submifs +ha'r ‘rhe fac‘l's and question of law involved in 1he presen'l’ case are squarely covered by decision of 'rhis Cour? in fhe case of Yashwan‘l' Kumar Bharodwm‘ Vs. Municipal Corporadon, burg and anal-her (Supra), +0 which learned counsel appearing for the responden‘ls fairly concedes and agrees wi'rh ihe avermenf made by learned counsel appearing for ‘l'he petitioner. Accordingly, 'l'he wri‘r petition is allowed in Terms of The order passed in me case of Yashwanf Kumar Bharadwa‘i Vs. Municipal Corporation. burg and anaflier (Supra), subject fo verificafion of 'rhe fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 6i 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. t Satish K.Agnihoti‘i I Judge Sd/— 5ubhash —