Civil Writ Petition No. 15560 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 15560 of 2011 Date of Decision: 26.8. 2011 Jai Singh Saini Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others. ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA Present: Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti Jain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana for respondent no.1. Mr. Anish Batis, Advocate for respondents no. 2 and 3. RAJIVE BHALLA, J. ( ORAL) The prayer in this petition is for setting aside order dated 5.5.2006, whereby the petitioner's application for allotment of a plot as an oustee quota was rejected. Counsel for the petitioner submits that entire land belonging to the petitioner was acquired in two separate acquisitions. Land measuring 14K-12M was acquired for Sector 13, Sonepat, in 1993 , whereas land measuring 12K-15M was acquired for Sector 2, Sonepat in 2003. The respondents have rejected the petitioner's application for allotment of a plot as an oustee on the ground that less than 75% of his land has been acquired. Counsel for the Haryana Urban Development Authority (for short “HUDA”) submits that the petitioner has applied for allotment of a plot under the 1993 acquisition and not under the 2003 acquisition. The petitioner's claim for allotment was rightly rejected Civil Writ Petition No. 15560 of 2011 2 as in the year 1993, less than 75% of his land was acquired. It is further submitted that if the petitioner has any right, flowing from the 2003 acquisition, his application will be considered as and when it is filed. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner prays that as applications for allotment of plots, relating to the 2003 acquisition, have not been invited, liberty may be granted to the petitioner to file an application for allotment of a plot as and when plots are offered for allotment . In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application, for allotment of plot under the oustee quota before the Estate Officer-I, HUDA, Sonepat, along with the requisite fee. The application, so filed, shall be considered and decided as and when applications relating to the acquisition of land in the year 2003 are invited from oustees. While considering the petitioner's entitlement, the Estate Officer, HUDA, Sonepat, shall keep in mind that his entire land has been acquired. 26.8.2011 ( RAJIVE BHALLA ) VK JUDGE