1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 4526/2007 (Keharram Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 14/09/2007 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Rakesh Arora for the petitioner. Mr. V.R.Mehta, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and challan papers. I have carefully gone through the statements of witnesses recorded by the trial court. Most of the witnesses stated that the deceased married to the petitioner in “Anta-Santa” as the petitioner's sister Dariya married to the brother of the deceased. Most of the witnesses stated that Dariya used to go to her parents house frequently, whereas the deceased was not allowed to go to her parents' house. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, without commenting on the merit of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Keharram S/o Surtaram be released on bail in CR No. 115/07 P.S. Sanchore, district Jalore, 2 provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP