IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 3626 of 1991 Bombay Labour Union & Ors. .. Petitioners. V/s. Security Guards Board for Bombay and Thane District and others .. Respondents. Ms. Amita Borkar i/b. Ms. Neeta Karnik for the Petitioners. Ms. M.H. Lund with Ms. Lata Desai for the Respondent No. 1. CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 14.09.2004. DATED : 14.09.2004. DATED : 14.09.2004. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned counsel for the Respondent No. 1. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that inspite of repeated attempts, there are no instructions from the Petitioner Union. Under these circumstances, rule stands discharged for want of instructions. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)