1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2102 OF 2005 Ivan Cardinal Dias ... Petitioenr Versus The Stte of Maharashtra and Ors.... Respondents Mr. Clifford Martis for Petitoiner. Mr. P.G. Sawant, A.G.P. for R. Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: NOVEMBER 27, 2006 DATED: NOVEMBER 27, 2006 DATED: NOVEMBER 27, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Rule. Heard forthwith. . It is the case of the Petitioner that the Slum Tribunal for Greater Mumbai in Appeal No.39 of 2003 decided on 9.1.2004 has set aside the order dated 21.7.2001 of the Additional Collector (ENC) and the competent authority. It remanded the matter to the said authority. Though the order is dated 9.1.2004 and inspite of the repeated reminders, the same has not been disposed of till date. . Considering the above, we direct Respondent No. 1 after hearing the Petitioner and other parties who are involved, to dispose of the same not later than eight weeks from today. . This exercise to be done in the event the order 2 is not passed. If the order has already been passed, then the same be communicated to the Petitioners within four weeks from today. . Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)