1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 5237/2009 Sudam R. Tulshikar -: versus :- Division Forest Officer and another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : APRIL 5, 2010. Shri A.N. Vastani, learned counsel for petitioner points out that though Industrial Court vacated interim relief granted by the labour Court, petitioner is getting work and respondent is continuing him in service. He further states that before Labour Court in main ULP Complaint, petitioner has already filed examination-in-chief. According to him in this situation, as the petitioner is working continuously since 1.1.1990, status quo as on today needs to be continued and proceedings in ULPA Complaint should be expedited. Shri S.R. Deshpande, learned counsel for respondents, states that the complaint can be expedited, but no interim relief can be ordered. He states that if respondent need the services of petitioner, the work will be provided to him during the pendency of the complaint. I have perused the xerox copy of the document produced by the learned counsel for petitioner and petition itself contains a statement that petitioner was getting work 2 on the date of filing of the petition before this Court and xerox of the document shows that even today he is being provided with work inspite of adverse orders of Industrial Court in the matter. The facts there show that the respondents presently need his work. If the respondents need his service they shall provide and continue to provide work to him during the pendency of the complaint. The proceedings in ULP Complaint are expedited and the Labour Court at Gondia is directed to decide the matter as early as possible and in any case by 15.06.2010. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of with these directions. No cost. JUDGE Rgd.