IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 9852 of 2009 Between: Pothula Nagendra, S/o. Daduluri, Pamidi Village and Mandal, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The Deputy Chief Traffice Managerr, (Enquiry Officer), APSRTC, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 2. The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing notice to attend for enquiry in connection with the charge sheet dt. 16-8-2007 without awaiting for the judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 15/2009 on the file of the I Addl. Sessions Judge, Anantapur as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of Natural justice and in violation of Art. 14 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to proceed with enquiry until adjudication Criminal Appeal No. 15/2009 on the file of the I Addl. Sessions Judge, Anantapur in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.D.GOWD Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.W.V.S.RAJESWARI The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.9852 of 2009 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner Sri S. D. Goud submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication any further and seeks its dismissal. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous, at the stage of admission. No costs. -------------------------------- Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J mrk 23rd June 2009 ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD}