-,,.. '^<^ t^-.-va-k jti.pt^./1.-..-. PAGE- / BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGAKH AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P. No. -^^ /2011 Petitioner Accused (In iail) ^i^ ^:^^"""" y^s^ I-' Johan Ram Netam, aged about 45 years, son of Shri Sundar Ram Gond occupation - Agriculturist, R/o. Vill. Mugwal, P.S. Korar, Distt. North Bastar, Kanker (C.G.) (As per order Dt. 05.07.11) Johan Ram Upendi, son of Shri Chait Ram Upendi, occupation - Agriculturist, R/o. Vill. Mugwal, P.S. Korar, Distt. North Bastar, Kanker (C.G.) (As ner arrest / court surrender memp and final report) (P-2) VERSUS NON-APPLICANT State of Chhattisgarh, through the District Magistrate, North Bastar, Kanker (C.G.) ^' PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 QF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE.JL973_^-^ Ri "?WT ^^Sff SBt^iq* "<- ^il-H'fl<ntlj)<< ^SUH^4, 3'ST -*{WW<i, 'g^FIS, f^dl'y1!,'!. ^.^^^/'^ 3TI^?[Tra?T (yit^axi^) ^tiIRK ^iftiT 311^1 S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Pnkshant Kumar Mishra 24.11.2011. Shri Nitesh Pant, counsel Shri S.R.J. Jaiswal, Panel Heard on application for on 19/10/2011 in M.Cr.C. No. 295& whereas in fact his real name is ^Pih'¥ift*T*i)*i<nT ^f fsl^l <l^t^I< i?3TRm3]lSSI ftN- the appellant. llawverfortheState. c<|ffrection in the order passed by this Court iof2011. Learned counsel woutd ^ubmit that applicant No. 1 in the said M.Cr.C. was described as Joh^n Ram Netan S/o Sundar Ram Gond ohan Ram Upencfl S/o Chait Ram Upendi of village Mugwal, P.S. - Kor^r, District North Bastar, Kanker (C.G.) therefore name ofapplicant No.1 Ueserves to be corrected. Annexure P/2 is the bail reji on 05/07/2Q.11 after which previoi(s In the cause title of the bail drc 05/07Q011 also name of applica(it Synder Ram Gond and the same| of 2011. Thus, it appears that J< had never preferred anv bail before this Court and present i^ praver for correction is reiected. Leamed counsel would b|e iSection 439 of Cr.P.C. before th< jection order passed bythe Sessions Court M.Cr.C. was preferred before this Court. i|rcter dedded by the Sessions Court on is mentioned as Johan Ram Netam S/o Idescription was typed in M.Cr.C. No. 2952 >han Ram Upendi S/o Chait Ram Upendi applteation eHher before the Sessions Court or not a case of mis-description, therefore at liberty to move an application under Sessions Court on behalf of Johan Ram -FS/140—2/2011—1,50,000. t- -^ '^^ 3rcf '^•ITilRI^, •S ^, ^^^1.2^1.. W^T -q^T (lyt^q^;) an^iwfrrw (WT SII^I *li<* T^IIW ^f^t •BI^I — Ci-.- Ucendi S/o Chait Ram Upendi and| High Court giving correct descriptioiji Accordinalv, Cr.M.P. stands ^Pif?T£JT'f'^^ ^ ft^t ^RSR: ^afRiHsntsi thereafter, if occasion arises, before the Uismissed. Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge -!-