IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 14713 of 2010 Date of Decision: 18.8.2010. Rambir Singh --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. Ajit Sihag, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. R.S. Kundu, Addl. A.G., Haryana has been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner is working as a Clerk. It is stated that respondents invited applications for filling up the posts of Assistant Project Officers and the petitioner applied in response to the invitation for his deputation as the Assistant Project Officer. The respondents also called for the service record of the petitioner vide Annexure P-3. His service record was forwarded vide communication dated 28.6.2007 (Annexure P-4). Petitioner was asked to join, however, petitioner was not permitted to join. It is stated that a number of posts of Assistant Project Officers are lying vacant. Petitioner made representation (Annexure P-9) which has not been considered till date. CWP. No. 14713 of 2010 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, referred to above. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take decision on the representation made by the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 18.8.2010. lucky