IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1829 of 2010 SHREE 108 RADHA KRISHNAJEE MAHARAJ MARTIMAN BIRAJMAN AT HATI ASTHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 08.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved and seeks allotment of additional units in the land ceiling case. The impugned order records that since the final publication had been made under Section 15(1) of the Land Ceiling Act, the only recourse available to the petitioner is so advised was under Section 45(B) of the Act by making an application for reopening the case. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, if so advised purpose to proposes his remedies in accordance with the observations contained in the order dated 13.11.2006, in Ceiling Appeal Case No. 15 of 2002-03. What the petitioner proposes to do is for him to decide and not for the Court to make any observation. The application is disposed off in the aforesaid terms. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)