IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25736 of 2010 DINESH KEWAT S/O LATE SHARDA KEWAT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201/34of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the First Information Report on the basis of having been last seen with the deceased and there is no eye-witness to the murder. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran, in connection with Semra P.S. case no. 5/2010, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor 2 will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The Magistrate concerned is directed to check the case diary and confirmed that there is no eye-witness to the occurrence. Fahad. (Anjana Prakash, J)