IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52955 of 2008 SONU @ ARVIND KUMAR S/O SRI PRAHLAD SAH, R/O MOHALLA- NEEMAGHAT,P.S.- KHAJEKALLAN, DISTRICT- PATNA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 27/03/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. The informant has alleged that her son was called and he was companied by Pramod, Subodh and the petitioner. Later on he was shot dead at the behest of Krishna by this petitioner and two others Pramod and Subodh. Submission is that now trial of another accused has begun and in that case the informant has been examined as witness and she has not named the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner produced the copy of the depositions of the witnesses of that case and from the deposition it appears that the petitioner has been attributed primary role in the killing. Prayer for bail of similarly situated accused Subodh has been refused thrice by this Court. Considering the allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected in connection with Khajekallan P.S. Case No. 72 of 2005. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)