1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7997 OF 2010 Dadasaheb s/o Dagu Dale .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & another .. RESPONDENTS Mr. Vivek Dhage, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.B. Patil, AGP for the State. ===== CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 18 th NOVEMBER, 2010 PER COURT : 1 The limited grievance made in the petition is that though the petitioner has made representation to respondent no. 2 for considering him to be permitted as a librarian, the same is not yet decided by respondent no. 2. 2 We dispose of the petition with direction to respondent no. 2 to 2 decide the proposal of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today, in accordance with law. ( K.K. TATED ) ( B. R. GAVAI ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb/office/wp7997.10.odt.