IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 10947 of 2009 Between: 1 R.Dayanand Yadav, S/o. Komaraiah, R/o. H.No. 17-1-420, Shankeshwar Bazar, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 2 R.Komaraiah, S/o. Late Venktswamy, R/o. H.No. 17-1-420, Shankeshwar Bazar, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 3 R.Nirupa Rani, W/o. Komaraiah, R/o. H.No. 17-1-420, Shankeshwar Bazar, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 4 Saritha, W/o. Mahender, R/o. H.No. 17-1-420, Shankeshwar Bazar, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 5 Navitha, W/o. M.Mahender, R/o. H.No. 17-1-420, Shankeshwar Bazar, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 6 T.Swathi, W/o. T.Mallesh, R/o. H.No. 7-3-797/1, Brahmanadi, Yakuthpura, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The State of A.P., Central Crime Station, P.S., Hyderabad, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 2 Smt. R.Shalini, W/o. R.Dayanand Yadav, R/o. H.No. 18-5-890, Near Kotta Masisamma Temple, Laldarwaza, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto quash the proceedings in cr.No. 67/2009 on the file of the W.P.S.Central Crime Station, DD.Hyderabad The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.GANGA RAMI REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER PSR, J. Crl.P.No. 10947 of 2009 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. The de facto complainant/second respondent is present. The de facto complainant produced Identity card bearing FNS 351093 issued by the Election Commission of India, in proof of her identity. She reports that she is living along with her husband, first petitioner herein, as the matter is settled out of the court. 3. In the circumstances, as it is represented by the spouses that they are living together, the proceedings pending against the petitioners herein in Cr.No.67 of 2009 on the file of the W.P.S., Central Crime Station, D.D., Hyderabad are hereby quashed. The petition is accordingly allowed. 4. However, in case of any harassment in future, the de facto complainant/the second respondent herein is at liberty to file a fresh complaint. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. December 29, 2009. *BVS