: 1 : cwp-2641-11=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2641 OF 2011 Rakesh Walmikrao Nyaharkar .. Petitioner v/s. Sau. Kranti Rakesh Nyaharkar .. Respondent ......... Mr. P.L. Bhujbal for the petitioner ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 19th APRIL, 2011 P.C. : 1. The petitioner has filed petition under Hindu Marriage Act for divorce being Hindu Marriage Petition No.403 of 2010 in the District Court at Nashik. During the pendency of this petition, the respondent filed an application dated 5th August, 2010 for interim maintenance seeking maintenance for herself and one son and one daughter. That application was decided by learned 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nashik and by order dated 15th October, 2010 the learned Judge has directed the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- to the respondent- wife, Rs.3,000/- to son Mayur and Rs.2,000/- to daughter Purva by way : 2 : cwp-2641-11=.sxw of interim maintenance from the date of filing of the said application till disposal of the main petition. 2. This order dated 15th October, 2010 is challenged by the petitioner-husband. I have perused the order. The record clearly shows that the petitioner is earning a sum of Rs.20,000/- and odd every month by working in Public Works Department of the Government of Maharashtra. The learned Judge has fixed the needs of the wife and the two children at a nominal amount of Rs.5,000/-, Rs.3,000/- and Rs. 2,000/- respectively. I see no reason to interfere in the impugned order. It was submitted by learned Counsel for the petitioner that during the pendency of the main petition and before the order dated 15th October, 2010 he had paid substantial amount to the respondent. He submitted that some adjustment in payment of arrears of maintenance may be made in regard to the amount which was paid before the order dated 15th October, 2010. So far as this submission is concerned, I am not inclined to accept the submission made by learned Counsel for the petitioner. As regards the liability of the petitioner to pay maintenance is concerned, if the respondent had filed an application for interim maintenance and if the petitioner has paid certain amount to the respondent on his own, surely, at this stage there is no question of going into the accounts and making adjustment. : 3 : cwp-2641-11=.sxw 3. In my view, this is not a case where this Court should interfere in the impugned order in writ jurisdiction of this Court. Hence, following order is passed to dispose of the petition at the stage of admission. ORDER (i) The petition is rejected at the stage of admission with no order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)