IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA C.R.P No.5892 of 2010 Between: Pendurthi Venkata Rao, S/o Narayana. ..... PETITIONER AND Thumpati Venkata Lakshmi, W/o Subba Rao and another. .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA C.R.P No.5892 of 2010 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order of the learned II-Additional District Judge, West Godavari, Eluru, dated 08.11.2010 dismissing I.A.No.199 of 2010 in A.S.No.120 of 2010 filed by the appellant-defendant, who is the petitioner herein, under Order 41 Rule 5 read with Section 94 (e) of C.P.C. seeking Suspension/Stay of operation of the decree and judgment dated 20.02.2010 passed by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Chintalapudi in O.S.No.135 of 2008. Learned Counsel for the petitioner-defendant submits that the suit filed by the respondents-plaintiffs for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with their exercise of right of path way shown in plaint schedule plan “AB, CD, EF & GH”, was decreed and against the said judgment the petitioner-defendant filed A.S.No.120 of 2010 before the lower appellate Court and the same is pending. She further submits that during the pendency of the suit, the trial Court directed both the parties to maintain status- quo with regard to the existence of alleged paint schedule passage. She further submits that this Court, on 24.12.2010, while issuing notice before admission, directed the parties to maintain status-quo existing on that day with regard to the plaint schedule passage. She further submits that the lower appellate Court may be directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner-defendant expeditiously. Learned Counsel for the respondents-plaintiffs submits that plaintiffs have no objection if the order of Status-quo is ordered to be maintained. In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case, the parties are directed to maintain Status-quo existing as on today with regard to the plaint schedule passage. However, the learned II-Additional District Judge, West Godavari, Eluru is directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner-defendant expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ______________________ ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J 23.12.2011 Gsn