IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 711 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 438 OF 2009 GOA GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION THROUGH GENERAL SECRETARY GANESH CHODANKAR ... Applicant Versus SHRI. KASHINATH SHETYE AND 18 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Nigel Da Costa Frias,Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Ryan Menezes, Advocate for the original writ petitioners/ respondent Nos. 1 to 9. Mr.S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. Sapna Mordekar,Additional Government Advocate for the respondent No.10,11. Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate for the respondent No.19. Coram:- S.B. DESHMUKH & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 17th September, 2009 P.C. We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant, Advocate appearing for the original writ petitioners and Advocate General Mr. Kantak. After hearing the matter, the learned Advocate for the original writ petitioners, has no objection. The learned Advocate General Mr. Kantak, submits that if the applicant is permitted to be intervened as an intervenor, he has no objection. However, he should not be permitted to file affidavit because in that circumstances, the respondents in original writ petition, may not have an opportunity to meet the allegations and or facts alleged against the respondents. The Counsel appearing for the applicant / intervenor submits that if necessary, intervenor may file separate writ petition. In this view of the matter, the civil application is allowed. The applicant/ intervenor is permitted to intervene in the writ petition, however, shall not file any affidavit. The petitioners to implead the present applicant as an intervenor in the original writ petition. Advocate for the petitioners, makes a statement that a copy of the petition would be served to the Advocate appearing for the intervenor. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. U. D. SALVI, J. SMA