s P.R.Na..-»....—~.~-^'~j"m'^" Presented by Shri...i?^"^—^"— t^, .^^^W^ oM)T •Q- "<• asaa -"' •riir" sa& iei"f V 'il « W THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRITPETITION.NO. ^K&7 OF 2004 3 BETWEEN Ram Kripal -Devdas s/o Shri D.R.DeV&s aged about 30 years,presently posted and working as Assistant Teacher, posted at Primary School Bami (attached with Primary School Baniya (Sankul Ranvirpur), resident of Village Koylari,District Kabirdham (C.G.) PETITIONER AND 1 - The State of Chhattisgarh, -s:^ Through the Secretary Department of School '?y^ducation,Mantralay D.K.S. Building, Raipur -iC.G.) 2-;The Director, Public Instmction,Chhattisgarh,Raipur.Teshil ^y/and District Raipur (CG.) -•••e'^^ 3- The Collector,Kabirdham (C.G.) 4- The District Education Kabirdham, (CG). 5- The Block Education Officer,Salhe Lohara,District Kabirdham 6- Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat,Salhe Lohara,District Kabirdham (CG). RESPONDENTS WKIT PETITION UN0ER ARTICLE 226/2.27 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA o" t'iB]»niWf'IUW'i^'"f"IjiiWtiliWWtR XI-HC-22 STl^r^iT fewsn^r 3)TlW(rf5(T s^ '<<i<iici^, s'rfhpre, Rcii+iy *<|t|WI ffMfffl^mWo^o/, H^ 200 f^% 311^1^-dlWff^ 15.7.2005 Sint. Renu Kocher, Shri Pankai Shrivas No. 1 to 5. None for the Respoi|ident No.6. Heard. CYdvocateforthe petitioner. ^tava, Advocate for the respondents Constitution The petitioner has| 226/227 ofthe dated 13.8.2004 passed whereby he has beea plac|( The petitioner was ^ III vile order dated 24.St. School, Bami The servic( vide order dated 13.8.2004 for ffae pctitioner submite] (5) (a) of Rule 9 of (Classi&cation, Control Saj Rules 1966') provides tt^at staad revoked on expuy| date of order of suspensi^) «bl<lfc1^1.)tllldl'fffe^ <^WK ^)3rf^TF3TI^T filed this petition under Article of India chaUenging fhe order by fhe Respondent No.3 CoUector, :d under suspension. ippointed as Shiksha Kanni Grade- 1998 aad was posted at Pmnaiy •s of the petitioner was suspended (Aanexure P/l). Leamed couxisel that fhe second proviso of sub-rule fhe Chhatdsgarh CivU Services Appeal) Rules 1966 (for short 'the 'fhe order of suspension shaU of the period of 90 days frois. the >n, in case fhe copy ofchaiges and ('f&^f^) ^ sifyfs r'aiTRT QE Ging^TTISiSARH^EmiICATUREAT^ XI-HC-22 STI^TECT fei^siT^r gitiR;Hf?tr i'il;!. " |Sl 3^ '^WM*1, Vl-^WW, [«fc11<iy HTHpTTStllTTfl 311^1 Mslfl FOS^O^ f^b^ ail^l ^•WlWtrf^T --2 otfaer documents referred |to iu sub-rule 2(a) are not issued to such Govenuaent serv^at', and as provided ia sub-rufe Ritles 1966 copy of the articles of imputetions of nusconduct and a wit|iesses have not yet beea provided 2(a) of Rule 9 of the chai^es, the statenient of| list of documents and to the petitioner. In fhe present case| expired on 12.11.2004 suspension order i.e. 13.f has not been seived wifh fitoin documents as required. ^c staads revoked, Leamed coiinsel forl no payment of subsistenc^ petitioner tffl date. Notices were issuedl despite notice, no reply ha^ In view of fhe fact fhe 90 days no chai^e-41 +i''<f<-i'ifl-f t<iti(-fTfffgiA<Ri.L<i< ^3lRTO-3I]^T the prescribed period of 90 days fhe date of issuance of the .2004. Adinittedly, the petitioner aay chai^e sheet and ofher scordingly, the suspension order the petitioner further subniits that aUowaace has been inade to the to the respondents on 25.2.2005, been filed by them. fliat diuiag suspension period for theet aud other docuiaeuts were (-^y^) l!<SI ;'':! XI-HC-22 Sn^T^iT f?;TR?3:n^T gii)iq;gf?Tr *&-.-•{?:• ff..^tv^' ...fc <1' ^ .)-• 'Sv! ri)|<<|rt<|, giTflu'ld, )slc)iyi|< 311^1 Msjtft ^oe-f-fo^ Hl 1-19(T ShHtcti f^% an^rg^rrwBfer issued to the petitioner t4e revoked'as provided in S^ib 1966. Shri Paakaj the respondents/State Respondent No.6 to expla In view of fhe foreg respondents are directe4 petitioner for fhe month fi-om the date ShrivAstava suspenjsion However, there shall be n(i Consequentty, M(\|V) 8289/2004, 8290/2004 ajnd '+iwtfi-'fl-i *iiticiTffte^; ^T3I^IT3TI^T suspension stands automaticaUy tf -rule 5 (a) of Riile 9 of fhe Riiles stava, leamed counsel appearing subnuts fhat fhis is for the ia>n. St>ing the petition is aUowed and the to make paymeiit of salaiy to the period witfaia a period of one 4f receipt of copy of ttus order. order as to costs. P No. 4459/2004, I.A. No. 1346/3005 staad disposed of. Sd/- Satisti K. Agnibotn Judge (<ft^y^)