IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.20598 of 2010 RAMDHYAN RAI . Versus THE CHAIRMAN BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS. ----------- 2. 18.03.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the Respondent Board. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a representation before Respondent no. 2 alleging a defective electric meter recording incorrect reading. Exhorbitant bills have been raised. The meter requires replacement which may be done. He only desires the Assistant Electrical Engineer (Respondent no. 2) to consider his representation. This matter has been listed under the heading ‘For Orders’ at the request of the petitioner that he did not wish to press the writ application on merit but desired a limited direction for disposal of his representation only. There has been therefore no occasion for the Court to go into merits of the claim and/or on which the representation may be founded. That is a matter which remains in the exclusive domain of the respondents to be considered by them in their wisdom in accordance with law. Nothing in this order shall be deemed or construed as any observation, opinion and/or direction of the Court on the merits of the matter. Let the representation of the petitioner be disposed off in the aforesaid manner preferably within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)