"i'7 l~t.y .,/- . //F/^^ • IN THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.V WRIT PETITION fSINO. <"/° OF200$7 PETITIONER <\<fe-^-" ..'-/}'%•'/"...-•• y:^s^'' .-••••"^^\.^>";"' ""^^1"" <>^'" ^ ^.- SP°-" RESPONDENTS Dilchand Chauhan Son of Shri Amlipoti Chauhan, aged about 40 years, Presently posted at Govt. Primary School Chhuipali, Block Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.). VERSUS ^ State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). ' 2. The District Education Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.). / . • ' ' /3. The Block Education Officer, Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI.- MANDAMUS ETC. , AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS. DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. 1^^,A ^ HI6H COURT OF OWATTISeAW AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HQ BLE MR. SAT1SH K, AQMIHOTRI^J, WRTT PETTTEON (s) N0. S070F 2007 Petjtjen^r Respondents ver&is PremkilChauhan State of Chhatl'isgarh and others WRrr PETTTION (s) NO sio OF 2007 Petitioner ftespondents versus DilchdBid Oiauhan State of Chhatt'isgarh and others WRTT PETmON ls} N0. S19 OF 2007 Petitjoner versus Resoondents Surendro Kumar Bishal Stateof Chhatl'isgarh and otiiers WRIT PETmON ts) N0. S21 OF 2007 Petitioner Kegaondents versus Ramtal Sahu State of Chhattisgarf) and others WRTT pETrrroN fsyNO,_522 <y 2007 PetitiorKr versus Reqiondents Topsingh Patel State of Chhatfisgarh and others And WRIT pFnnoN fa) NO. 523 OFZOOI Petitioner versus Resoondents Bhonupratap Sickir State of Chhatt-isgarh and others Present : Mr. P.P. Sahu, counsel for the petitkmers, Mr. Sati^i 6upta, t)y. ftoyt. Mvocate for tire State/ respondents. ^^ ORDER (Passed on this 25th day of Jonuary, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petttionersas well as for the State/reSpondents jointly submit that the factsand question of law involyed in the present writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court m -the case of yashwafif Kwiar Bharadweyis. Mwiiepal Corporation, t>wy and armthw/^. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court- in the matter of yashwant/&/mar BhcuwdwaJ^Supra}. subject to verificatjon of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired B.T.I. Certificates at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 cnd further whether they have been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record in connec'ted writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 2006C[I)MPJR-C696