’?;:i:::;: bQ gig THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.S.No. My? OFzem H WRIT PETITION UNDER ' ARTICLE 22$ (3F THE} (ImNSiTlTUTION OF INDIA ”WTE’V‘IQNERS L/ Bharat BhuShan Mishra S/O Latv Jagannath Mishra, aged abouta‘H (years, 2. Bhuvneshar Mishra S/o Laic Jagannath Mishra, ag€d about48 years, 3. ' Bisheshwar Mishra S/o Lam Jagannath Mishra, aged aboutv46 years A11 resident of Chhote Atarmuda Raigarh, Tahsil 8a Digtt. Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. Stat€ of Chhattisgar‘h through Sécretary, Schcol Ecmcalima Department , DK‘§ b’ “Lavan, Raipu‘y (C.G.) w” Accountant General , Raipur (0G,) w Block Education Officer. Biiaigarh, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.}‘ , ” ()5? HIGH COU RT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N066? OF 2011 Bharat Bhushan Mishra & Others Petitionem Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Qenstitution of lndia) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri M.K. Sinha, Advocate for tife petitioners. Shri Y.S. Thakur,- Deputy Advocate Generai fer the State. ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 4‘ day or February, 201 1) at Learneg counsel appearing for thepetitioners submits that the case, being payment of retirai benefits matter, may be referred to the pension committee. Shri Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State agrees with the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Submits that the request of the petitioner is genuine and proper and the same order may be passed. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Barfnath Mandel v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to‘co‘nsider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19052006 passed in WP. No. 1961!2006 (Smt. Keja Bei Chandrakar v, State Govemment and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M:C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh & Others v. Baijnath Manda! and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 313‘ of January, 2008 passed in WP. No. 4642/2004 Bag‘nath Mandel (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e. the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Comrhittee shaii issue notice to the petitioner and the officers concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shail' consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitionerf The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additionai documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, inciuding payment of retirai dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioners shall supply extra copy of the petition to the learned counsel appearing for the respondents for forwarding the same to the Committee. W n Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Arun