1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA/9808/2008 In FAST/17506/2008 AND CA/1096/2008 IN FAST 25844/2008. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 10 th July, 2009. 1) Heard Mrs.RR Mane, AGP for State and Mr.RC Patil, Counsel for Respondent No.1. 2) The State seeks to condone delay of 424 days in causing to file appeal, whereby the State desires to challenge the Award dated 12.4.2007 passed by learned Joint CJSD, Dhule in LAR No.50/2001. Reading paragraph 4 of the application explaining the grounds by itself is not sufficient to condone the delay. The delay is not properly explained, the application for condonation of delay dismissed. The appeal also dismissed. 3) The claimant has challenged the 2 Judgment and Order dated 12.4.2006 in LAR No.50/2001, indicating that the enhancement made by the learned Reference Court is inadequate. 4) Already by separate order the application moved by the State for condonation of delay is dismissed. 5) In the appeal moved by the claimant, there is delay of 513 days. The delay is not properly explained. It is difficult to digest that the applicant/claimant had no money to spend the amount which was required for the purposes of expenses in filing the appeal. This may not be a sufficient ground to seek condonation of delay. The application dismissed. No costs. Necessary court fees be refunded to the respective appellants. ( K.U.CHANDIWAL ) JUDGE bdv/ca9808.08