1 D.B. PAROLE PETITION NO. 7539/2010 Prahlad Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order : 26.11.2010 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI Mr.Bhagat Dadhich for the petitioner Mr.K.R.Bishnoi, P.P. ***** The petitioner Prahlad Ram son of Ganesh Ram, at present lodged in Central Jail at Jodhpur, was convicted for the offence under Section 302 IPC and was sentenced, inter alia, to life imprisonment by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Nagaur by the judgment and order dated 07.04.2004. Until 11.08.2010, the petitioner has served the sentence of 8 years 2 months and 11 days including jail remissions. The petitioner applied for and was granted regular parole for a period of 20 days from 06.05.2008 to 25.05.2008. The subsequent prayer of the petitioner for grant of next parole for a period of 30 days was, however, declined on 15.10.2009 by the District Parole Committee, Nagaur particularly in view of the adverse report received from the Superintendent of Police, Nagaur (Annex.R/1) wherein it was, inter alia, pointed out that his behaviour and conduct during the earlier 20 days’ parole was not satisfactory and he rather attempted to charge upon the wife of the victim and 2 thereafter, regular surveillance was required to be put upon him. The petitioner has forwarded this letter petition from jail with the submissions that no case was registered against him for any such alleged act of charging upon or assault any person and no such incident took place. The petitioner has also submitted that he belongs to a poor family and is having old aged parents. While considering this petition, it was noticed on 27.08.2010 that petitioner’s brother Kishna Ram @ Kishan Gopal had been a co- accused who too has been convicted and his parole petition bearing No.7538/2010 was allowed by a separate order of even date. It was, therefore, considered proper to keep the present parole petition of the petitioner Prahlad Ram pending until his brother Kishna Ram remains on parole. It is now pointed out that the said brother of the present petitioner did avail of 30 days’ parole from 19.10.2010 to 17.11.2010; and did surrender on 17.11.2010. Nothing has been placed on record to indicate if there had been any questionable conduct of said brother of the petitioner during parole. In the totality of facts and circumstances, we consider it proper to extend the benefit of second parole of 30 days to the petitioner but while imposing conditions that it shall be required of him to behave properly and not to give any cause of complaint during such period of parole; and while also giving a liberty to the 3 respondents to seek revocation of parole being granted herein if there be any questionable conduct of the petitioner during such period of parole. In view of the above, this parole petition is allowed in the manner that the respondents are directed to release the petitioner on parole for 30 days on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each. The stipulations aforesaid that the petitioner shall behave properly during parole and that the respondents shall be entitled to seek revocation of parole on any report of questionable conduct shall be distinctly stated in the personal bond to be furnished by the petitioner. A certified copy of this order be forwarded to the petitioner. (KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI ), J. (DINESH MAHESHWARI), J. mk