CWP No. 3443 of 2011 06.09.2011 Present: Mr. Nimish Gupta, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General, for the respondents. The petitioner got enrolled himself as a physically handicapped person with Special Employment Exchange for person with disability. In 2008, the petitioner received a interview letter from respondent No. 1 for the post of Assistant Librarian and his name was sponsored by Sub Employment Exchange Officer, Nalagarh. The petitioner appeared in the interview on 19.12.2008 as per Annexure P-2. The result of the interview was not declared and when he enquired, he learnt that the interviews were cancelled and fresh date for interview will be intimated. In 2009, the respondents again advertised for the vacancies and respondent No. 3 sponsored the names of eligible candidates. However, the name of the petitioner was not sponsored by the respondents. 2. The plea taken by the respondents in their reply is that only once the name is sponsored for the post and as such, it was not sponsored for the second date. 3. However, the case of the petitioner is that once the interviews were cancelled, his name should have been sponsored next time also. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner at the bar that one person, namely, Sanjay Kumar son of Shri Hari Ram was sponsored second time for the post of Assistant Librarian and similar treatment should be meted out to the petitioner, whose name should have been sponsored again by the …2… Employment Exchange. The petition is allowed to this extent that the petitioner is permitted to file a representation before respondent No. 2 alongwith a copy of the writ petition, copy of the order passed today by this Court as well as fresh representation setting out his grievances in this regard in detail. The same shall be filed within two weeks from today and respondent No. 2 shall consider this representation and in case, he is satisfied, he shall pass appropriate orders for sponsoring the name of the petitioner, as was done to similarly situated persons. The same shall be decided by respondent No. 2 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation. 4. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Copy Dasti. September 06, 2011 ( V.K. Ahuja ), J. (BSS)