IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 23RD FEBRUARY 2007 / 4TH PHALGUNA 1928 RP.No. 469 of 2003 ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN CRP.2934/2001 Dated 22/02/2002 AA.546/1997 of APPELLATE AUTHORITY, LAND REFORMS, KANNUR (IA.122 /1997) .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/REVISION PETITIONERS ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. KOTTOOR MADATHIL VASUDEVAN NAMBISSAN, S/O. CHERIYA VISHNU NAMBISSAN, ALAPPADAMBA AMSOM DESOM P.O., ALAPPADAMBA 2. CHEPPAYI KOTTOR MADATHIL NARAYANAN, NAMBISSAN S/O. LATE DAMODARAN NAMBISSAN, ALAPPADAMBA AMSOM DESOM, P.O.ALAPPADAMBA (THROUGH POER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER KOTTOR MADATHIL VASUDEVAN NAMBISSAN) BY ADV. SRI.T.A.RAMADASAN SRI.A.K.ALEX RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS --------------------------------------------------- 1. ABDULLA KUNHI, S/O. MAMMAD OTTATHAI, VADAKKUMBAD PO.KARIVELLUR, TALIPARAMBA TALUK. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY CHIEF SECRETRY, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.V.T.K.MOHANAN SRI.M.SASINDRAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/02/2007 ALONG WITH R.P.622 OF 2003, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE.FOLLOWING: K.P.BALACHANDRAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.NO.469 OF 2003 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of February 2007 ORDER The petitioners are the revision petitioners in C.R.P.2934/01 filed against the order of the Land Reforms Appellate Authority, Kannur in A.A.546/97 dismissing the said appeal consequent on dismissal of the delay condonation petition I.A.122/97. This court after considering the matter on merits disposed of the C.R.P. vide order dated 22.2.2002. The case of the petitioners is that they could not produce the death certificate of Cheriya Vishnu Nambisan, the father of the first petitioner and that could be traced out only later that the said certificate would show that summons had actually not been served on to him in S.M.proceeding in 7488/75 which if established the appellate authority itself would have condoned the delay. The death certificate was not produced even before this court till the CRP was disposed of vide order dated 20.2.2002. Bringing in new matters and urging matters not urged at the time of disposal of the CRP is not a ground to allow the review petition. This review petition in the circumstances is devoid of merit and is dismissed. K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JUDGE jes K.P.BALACHANDRAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P.NO.469 OF 2003 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ORDER Dated 23rd February 2007