c^ (fo\ INTHEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPNO._28^S'/2003- ^ PETITIONER ^^y RESPONDENTS 1. Duchand Dewangan, aged about 41 years, son of Late^Deen Dayal D.ewangan, resident of Subhash Chowk, Patan, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, through: The Chief Engineer, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. The Superintending Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board, Distt. Durg (Cbhattisgarh). .-:'teS 3. The .- Assistant Engineer, Chhattisgarh State EleGtricity Board,Patan, Distt. Durg(CG) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 3i1^5[^rt \<W^ •a{\^ ^^tiq?^^^ :\. 's^'^WvW, fs-iSww, faiaray anigr 'qgTSK IIICTI aiiicti""""'""""'"""""" " " ^I, 2803, fa*<il£T""'"""'""""""""""" Sf^S ¥8HW^f^a diich when 12.09.2003 l-1eard ShriP.P. Sithu.coun^ellfor By this writ petition under India, -the petitioner Seeks to 4^ 11.07.3003, The petitioner is workin9 a^ Distribution Centre. Paton. Vide) Transferred from Pafan To Durg, the present place of posting. Thi tfaat he is a low pdidyemployee and} distance particuktrly^^at <a stage Patdn. Bein9 a louu paid employee ij family from Patan tp burg andhet|i and financial loss; Iri the to mcuntain his •fwnily. Howin9 heard I +he learned] petitioner is allowed to make a difficulties ond grievonces thsrei4 todayto re3pbndentMo.2and in tu) representation in objective manner). order. wi-thih a period of thirty representatibn ond pass oppropt-i^te cjrcumiittmces dcjys 'tllltfl'B-i Hl*tin['81®^At^K ^3lii<PT3i]^[ thepetitioner. Article 226 of the Constitution of ;hallen9e his transfer order dated Additional Line Man and posted at the impugned order, he has been is said to be 32 kms. awoy from s main grievance of^the petitioner is hehas been Iwuisferred to 32 kms. his fiv®childreri are studying dt will be difficult for him to shift his filj be put to unnecessary hardssment !, it will be very difficult for him counsef for the ^ petitioner; the uled representation meritionin9 atl his within a peribd of ten days from 'n respondent N6.2 shatl consider" the dhd decide the same with a reasoned from the date of receipt of the order; lookijig to the facts dnd -[1fi^^^3^^ ~^i a • sn XI-HC-22 sii^rqa l<-fi<* S!^S ?h*ttet) •ylitf 5oma '35°? •<ll'!(iwal; ai'nl'y'is,' R«vill«y sn^r 'q^? ___....^.:SS^^Sj HIICTI thliqi 200^ fN^T' ipresenjhation circumstances. Till the represen|'ation beallowed to continye in the prese(nt place With the above observationl In vjew of this orde^ No.8493/2003 stand disposed of. Parties are entitled for cerlffied copy of thisorder. <til<<!<'f1"l'< H14<'iI4'fetfl <Rl<sl< ^siPan aii^i is decided the.petitioner should it place of posting. the petitionis disposed of finally. , M.(W.)P.No.2591/2003 and I.A. Sd/- L-C. Bhaduo Judge '^ /I [^^fis^ "\