IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17555 of 2011 Rajeev Ranjan Rai @ Pappu Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3 01.07.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Though, there is accusation of demand of dowry and torture but it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. The offer of the petitioner is being accepted by learned counsel for the complainant. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the complainant that the petitioner has also filed a divorce case. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner will withdraw the divorce case. Considering the aforesaid stand of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for six months, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hajipur, Vaishali in connection with C.R. Case No. 697/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. It is agreed between the parties that the petitioner and the complainant will appear before the learned court below on 1st of August, 2011 when the petitioner will take the complainant to her matrimonial house to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour. Learned court below will confirm the provisional anticipatory bail of the petitioner on substantial restoration of the matrimonial harmony or the complainant deliberately refuses to reside with the petitioner. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)