IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THIS THE 29th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2009 W.P.No.26182 of 2009 Between: Mohd. Gulam Jeelani ... PETITIONER(S) and The Commissioner, Nirmal Municipality, Adilabad District. …RESPONDENT(S) THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.26182 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition is filed assailing the notice dated 19.11.2009 through which the petitioner was required to stop the construction. The petitioner was accorded permission on 23.06.2007 enabling him to construct a new building in the place of old one in premises bearing no.7-3-189 (Old No.7-3-29/52), Johranagar Colony, Nirmal, Adilabad District. On a complaint received from the Principal Judicial First Class Magistrate, Nirmal, alleging that the petitioner is encroaching into the land belonging to the Court, the Municipality issued the impugned notice. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporation for respondent. The necessity for this Court to deal with the validity and legality of the impugned notice is obviated on account of a subsequent development. During pendency of this writ petition, the municipality has inspected the site and on finding that the petitioner has deviated from the sanctioned plan and encroached into public roads, it passed an order on 27.11.2009 cancelling the permission. The petitioner filed W.P.No.27021 of 2009 assailing the said order. In that view of the matter, this writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J 29th December 2009 CVRK