: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.787 OF 2009 Ganpat Anandrao Pawar ... Applicant V/s. Vincent Salu Gomes ... Respondent Mr.Khan Javed Akhtar for Applicant Mr.V.E. Pereira for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: DECEMBER 17, 2009 P.C.: 1. The applicant has challenged the order of the Small Causes Court as well as the appellate Court which had decreed the suit for eviction on the ground of bonafide requirement of the premises. The suit had been filed for eviction of the applicant u/s 16 (1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The plaintiff therein had contended that he required the place bonafide for use of his family consisting of himself, his wife, three daughters and a son who were all majors. 2. Both the trial Court as well as appellate Court have held that the plaintiff had proved his need for the premises and have therefore decreed the suit. In my opinion, there is no need to disturb the concurrent findings of facts recorded by the both the Courts below. 3. Civil revision application dismissed.