U1: :N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTtseARH AT EILASPUR {WW JURisDICTrON] WRIT PETmoN 2Wgj 2003 iN THE MATTER QF.’ —_ Aim ku!-shreshtha Aged about 34 years S/O Sri Krishna Gapai Kuishreshtha Rio 2W6 South T.T. Nagar Bhopal. {Madhya Pradessh} PETETleNER i4} COMMiSSiONER Treasury and Accounts Govt. Of Madhya Pradesh Bhopai.{Madhya Pradesh} v . ‘WRET PETiTl0N UNDER ART!CLE 2261'22? OF THE. i CGNSTiTUTiQN NATURE OF MANDAMUS, 9F ENEIA FGR PROHiBlTIQN, ESSUANCE CERTIORARI OF A WRIT ETC iN THE OR i' r ANY OTHER DiRECTiON OR ORDER TO DO JU$TICE EN THE i i: ‘riXTTER g/ ’ M. / a. VERsUS {1} Llnion Of India RE$PONDENT Through weretary Department of Persona§ & Training 3 rd Flcor Lok Nayak Bhawan Khan Market / a, g“: New new V /. g“: \v?r'?§\\$’9 [2} State 0f Chhattisgarh Thraugh secretary Department Of Finance 3&3 ahawan, Raipur. iahnattisgam; 7A?” ‘..-~"%‘\(\ %x‘9‘%»<i§' 6%.. écx§§' \ ,. m . . k$ Kai Q“; 9' ”96" , “w‘ ” {3} State 0f Madhya Prade3h ‘1 Through Secretary Finance Department Vaiiabh Bhawan Bhopal. [Madhya Pradesh} b“ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Writ Petition No. 2783 of 2003 Petitioner Atu], Kulshreshtha VErsus Raspondents Union of India 8:» others Shn' Sunil Otwani, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri S. K. Beriwal, Standing counsel for Respondent No. 1, Shri Sachin Singh Rajput for Respondents No, 3 and 4. Shri Pankaj Shxivastava, Panel lawyer for respondent No. 2. I ORAL ORDER ( 8th February; 2006) The following order of the Couit was passed by Satish K. Agihotri, J. i 1. Learned counsel appealing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is a member of the Subordinate Accounts Services in the Finance Department, is a permanent resident of District- Bhopal in the State of Madhya Pradesh, The petitioner has been allocated to the State of Chhattisgarh and ' he wants his 'reallocan'on to the State of Madhya Pradesh. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that the petitioner be granted liberty to make a representation to the respondents for redressal of his grievances. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to the said submission. In View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of finally, with liberty to the petitioner to make an appropriate representation to the respondents/authorities concerned, Within a period ‘of two weeks from today, and the respondents! authorities are directed to consider and decide the same, in an objective. manner, in i accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, ifany, O[ \ i Certined copy, as per Rules. 1 V . Sd/u ., _ _ \ \ Satish K.Agnihotri c t.__ Judge “ x; ’ ‘ Thakur M /«‘ t Jr