IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2198 of 2011 PINTU KUMAR @ CHHOTU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 195 of 2010 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307,308, 286,379 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. There is general allegation against all the accused persons to have assaulted the victim. Though there is specific allegation against Tiju Yadav and Raj Kumar. It is also submitted that the occurrence took place on 02.04.2010 whereas the First Information Report was lodged on 05.04.2010. Learned counsel for the informant submits that there is allegation against all the accused persons to have assaulted and the informant succumbed to injury. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the learned court below consider - 2 - the regular bail application of the petitioner without being prejudiced by the order of this court if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)