1 cri.contempt pet.5-11 mgn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.5 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2915 OF 2010 Mr.Chandrakant Kondiba Bhagat ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr. Kenny Desai i/b. Mr. A. M. Saraogi, for the petitioner. Dr. F.R.Shaikh, APP for the State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & A.M. THIPSAY, JJ. DATED: 28th April, 2011 P.C. Heard Ms.Desai holding for Mr. Saraogi, the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Prayer clause (a) of the petition reads as under:- (a) that it be declared that the Respondent had willfully disobeyed the orders passed by this Hon’ble Court being the order dated 13th October, 2010 passed in Writ Petition No.2915 of 2010 by failing to 2 cri.contempt pet.5-11 look into and take cognizance and/or enquire into complaint of the Petitioner being the complaint dated 9th June, 2010.” We have noted that the respondent has not been named in as much as the Officer who is alleged to have disobeyed the order passed on 13th October, 2010 in Writ Petition No.2915 of 2010 has not been named as respondent. Secondly, if the order passed in Writ Petition No.2915 of 2010 has not been implemented, there may be a case for initiating Contempt Proceedings on civil side i.e. Civil Contempt within the meaning of Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. 2. Hence this Petition is disposed with liberty as is available in law. (A.M. THIPSAY, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)