IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 58 OF 2005 MR. ANTONIO FERDINO VARELA, ST. ....Appellant ESTEVAM, ILHAS GOA. Versus MRS. THERESA MARIA ANGELA VARELA, ....Respondent ST. ESTEVAM, ILHAS GOA. Mr. Rohit Bras De Sa, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. M. B. D'Costa, Senior Advocate with Mr. J. Abreu Lobo, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 31st March, 2006 P.C. Heard Mr. Rohit D'Sa, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr. M.B. D'Costa, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent. By this appeal, the appellant who is the plaintiff in the Matrimonial Petition No.40/03/B, challenges the order dated 16th September, 2005 by which maintenance of Rs.4,000/- per month has been granted in favour of the minor son of the plaintiff and the defendant. The grievance of Mr. D'Sa, learned Counsel for the appellant is that by the impugned order maintenance has been granted even in favour of the respondent. He fairly submitted that the appellant has no objection if the amount of Rs.4,000/- per month by way of maintenance is granted in favour of the minor son. In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the appellant, it is clarified that the maintenance awarded by the trial Court is to the minor son and not to the respondent. In view of this position, nothing survives in this appeal. The appellant shall deposit the entire amount due as on date, if not deposited so far, within a period of three weeks from today in the trial Court. The appeal stands disposed of in aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ssm.