IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.24 of 2010 SURENDRA PRASAD SINGH, son of Late Mokhtar Singh, resident of village- Bangra, P.S. Masrak, Prakhand- Goa, P.O. Dumarsan, District- Saran …Plaintiff/Appellant Versus 1. BRIJ MOHAN SINGH @ BRAJ MOHAN son of Late Biswanath Singh, 2. Umesh Kumar Singh, son of Late Biswanath Singh, Both resident of village- Bangra, P.S.- Masrak, P.O.- Dumarsan Bangra, District- Saran 3. Saraswati Devi, wife of Lal Saheb Singh, resident of village- Nachap, P.S.- Manjhi, P.O.-Nachap, Via-Ekma, District- Saran 4. Vishundeo Narayan Singh, son of Late Daroga Singh, 5. Ramashanker Singh, son of late Radha Singh, 6. Nagendra Singh son of Late Radha Singh All resident of village-Bangra, P.S.-Masrak, P.O.-Dumarsan Bangra, District- Saran 7. Anandi Devi wife of Pampam Singh, daughter of Late Mokhtar Singh, resident of village- Harpur Karah, P.O.-Harpur, P.S. Baniyapur, District- Saran 8. Mira Devi, wife of Braj Mohan Singh, resident of village- Bangra, P.S.-Masrak, P.O. Dumarsan Bangra, District- Saran, 9. Kamlawati Devi wife of Upendra Nath Singh, resident of village- Bangra, P.S.- Masrak, P.O. Dumarsan Bangra, District- Saran 10. Mostt. Sharda Kuar, wife of Late Ram Pravesh Singh, resident of village- Bangra, P.S.-Masrak, P.O. Dumarsan Bangra, District- Saran & 11. Anju Devi wife of Bhim Singh, resident of village- Bangra, P.S.-Masrak, P.O. Dumarsan Bangra, District- Saran …Defendants/ Respondents ----------- For the appellant : Sri Subhas Prasad Singh, Advocate Respondent nos. 1 & 8: Sri Arun Kumar Singh No.5, Advocate Respondent nos. 2 to 7: Sri Dilip Kumar, Advocate. ------------ 3/ 25.02.2011 Heard the parties. The appellant is aggrieved with the order dated 18.11.2009 passed by the Sub-Judge 9th, Chapra, in Title Suit No.445 of 2007, by which he has refused injunction sought by the appellant. On going through the order impugned and the documents filed herein, I am of the view that in the facts of the case 2 status quo should be maintained till the disposal of the suit. The Sub-Judge 9th, Chpara, is, however, directed to conclude the proceedings within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Both the parties are in agreement that they shall not seek any unnecessary adjournments which would delay the disposal of the suit. With the aforesaid observation/ direction, this appeal is disposed of. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)