IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 39 of 2009 Vijay Sehrawat ………. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ………. Respondents Mr. Sandeep Tandon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, G.A. for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Sandeep Tandon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, G.A. for the State. 2. Learned G.A. for the State submits before this Court that it has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit filed in Crl. W.P. 991/2008 that the police has completed the investigation and after completion of investigation the police has found that there is a prima-facie case against the present petitioner as such the police has submitted the chargesheet before the Circle Officer concerned. It was further submitted that in view of above the writ petition filed by petitioner seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him has, now, become infructuous. As such, the police is likely to submit the chargesheet before the competent court in the near future. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. However, interim order dated 20.01.2009 shall remain operative till the final report is filed before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated 25.02.2009 LSR