IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21785 of 2010 1. RAM BRIKSHA YADAV @ RAM BRIKSH YADAV S/O LATE RAGHO YADAV 2. SANTOSH YADAV @ SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV S/O RAM BRIKSHA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioners are in custody since 10.04.2010 and the submission is that it is a case of civil dispute between the parties, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.K.Tiwari the learned J.M., Ist Class, Gaya, in connection with Tr. No. 794/09 arising out of complaint Case No. 1165/08, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish 2 information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuses, (iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays and trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )