SBCWP No.5252/2007 Dr. Madhu Singhal & Anr. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. 1 SBCWP No.5252/2007 Dr. Madhu Singhal & Anr. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : - 12.1.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.MC Bhoot,for the petitioners. Mr. RK Thanvi ] Mr. SG Ojha ], for the respondents. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. The injunction was granted by the first appellate court vide order dated 18th April, 2007, which virtually is the injunction to maintain the status-quo as the trial court granted injunction that the respondent (before the first appellate court) should not interfere with the appellant's (before the first appellate court) possession. Looking to the total facts of the case, this Court is of the view that the said order may not be interfered while exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and direction may be issued to the trial court to decide the suit expeditiously preferably within a period of SBCWP No.5252/2007 Dr. Madhu Singhal & Anr. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. 2 six months as according to learned counsel for the appellant, the suit is for grant of relief of injunction, which can be decided by the trial court with the cooperation of both the parties. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the trial court to decide the suit expeditiously preferably within six months and both the parties shall cooperate the trial court in deciding the matter. Copy of this order be sent to the trial court. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-