1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 41 OF 2009 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.631 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO,3531 OF 2003 Chaudhary Abdul Majid Shahadat. ...Petitioner. Vs. Aftab Ahmed Mohd. Rafi Qazi & Anr. ...Respondents .... Ms.Manjiri Shah with Ms.P. Mhatre, Ms.J. Ghag i/b. Thakore Jariwala & Aso. for the Petitioner. Mr.Sanjiv A. Sawant for Respondent No.1. ...... CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. July 27, 2009. P.C.: At the hearing of the Contempt Petition, the Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioner fairly states on the basis of the material that is placed on record that there is inadequate material before the Court for the Court to deduce that there has been a breach of the order dated 9th January 2009 of the Division Bench not to create any third party interests or transfer or dispose of the premises without the leave of the Court. In these circumstances, the Contempt Petition is not pressed. The Learned Advocate, however, 2 states that in the event that the Petitioner comes out with better material or particulars, the Petitioner reserves the right to move this Court in appropriate proceedings. In these circumstances, the Contempt Petition is disposed of. .....