( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 4 OF 2009 Baliram Bhivajirao Patil .. Appellant Versus Shivajirao Bhaurao Patil .. Respondent Ms. Meera Biradar, Advocate for the appellant. Shri V.G. Sakolkar, Advocate for sole respondent. CORAM : P.R. BORKAR,J. DATED : 07.09.2009 P.C. :- 1. Heard Adv. Ms. Meera Biradar for the appellant and Adv. Shri V.G. Sakolkar for sole respondent. This appeal from order is directed against the order to refuse grant ad- interim injunction, on application Exh.8, in Regular Civil Appeal No. 43 of 2008. Regular Civil Appeal No. 43 of 2008 was filed against judgment and decree passed in Regular Civil Suit No. 541 of 1992. The learned advocate for the respondent Shri Sakolkar has produced copy of application Exh.8, as it stands today. It is taken on record and marked ( 2 ) “X”. He points out that by order dated 06.08.2009, in view of pursis dated 06.08.2009 (Exh.29), application Exh.8 is finally disposed of. Therefore, this Appeal From Order does not survive. 2. Both the parties seek directions that the District Court may be directed to decide Regular Civil Appeal No. 43 of 2008 expeditiously. 3. In the result, this Appeal From Order is disposed of as infructuous and the District Court is directed to decide the appeal as early as possible. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2009/SEP09/ao4.09