IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.5164 of 2011 Arya Pratinidhi Sabha Haryana, Rohtak Vs. State of Haryana & others Present: Mr.Puneet Bali, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The present petitioner had earlier filed Civil Writ Petition No.12321 of 2010, which was dismissed on 15.7.2010, by passing the following order:- “The directions sought in the writ petition are that the petitioner-society should not be directed to hold elections. I am afraid that the writ would not be maintainable for such a plea. I am, thus, not inclined to interfere in exercise of extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction.” I am still of the view that writ petition would not be maintainable for issuing direction not to hold the elections. The said order was challenged in LPA, which has been disposed of by observing that the managing committee of the school, which is presently being run by an administrator is coming to an end in 2011 and the period would be over by 31.3.2011. The court had accordingly not adjudicated the issues involved and has closed the LPA. For me, no occasion would arise to have a change of view. The prayer made in the present writ petition is accordingly declined. The writ petition is dismissed. March 22, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE