THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.28565 of 2011 Dated 03rd December, 2011 Between: Rizwana Begum …Petitioner And The District Collector, Mahaboobnagar District and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: --- Counsel for respondents: AGP for Land Acquisition The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the compensation to the petitioner for the land acquired to an extent of 488 sq.yards situated at Jadcherla, Mahaboobnagar District and not taking any action by the 2nd respondent in pursuance of the letter issued by the 3rd respondent dated 18.05.2007 as highhanded and arbitrary action, contrary to well established principles of law, and as such liable to be set aside in the interest of justice by ordering to pay the compensation with interest from 18.05.2007 forthwith.” On 10.11.2011, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the case was adjourned after noting that the counter aﬃdavit has been ﬁled. Today, when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing her cause in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.35273 of 2011 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 03rd December, 2011 VGB