: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.305 OF 2008 Sonabai Anadrao Jadhav ... Appellant V/s. Laxman Sadhu (sic.Sahadu) Jadhav & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.Amit Sale for Appellant Mr.A.M. Kulkarni for Respondent Nos.1A to 1D, 3, 4 Mr.P.D. Dalvi for Resp. No.2 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: MARCH 18, 2010 P.C.: 1. The appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order passed in Regular Civil Appeal No.66 of 2001. The main controversy between the parties is whether the appellant Sonabai was in fact married to Anandrao Jadhav at any point of time. The only documents that she has relied on are the mutation entries, the bank accounts and the voters’ list to establish her case that she was married to Anandrao. No witnesses have been examined to prove whether she was in fact married to Anandrao. In my view, the appellate Court has committed no error by discarding these documents. Assuming the name of the appellant does appear on the documents, these documents, cannot by any stretch of imagination prove the marriage between the two. 2. No substantial question of law is involved in the present Appeal and hence, the appeal is dismissed.