IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 900 of 2008 Anil Kumar Kansal and another ........ Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ....... Respondents Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No. 4. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No. 4. 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the leaned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case submitted the chargesheet against the petitioners before the Circle Officer concerned and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit chargesheet before the court concerned in the near future. This face has been made in para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 12.11.2008 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 17.04.2009 Shiv