IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN THURSDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2008 / 23RD PHALGUNA 1929 WP(Crl.).No. 30 OF 2008(S) PETITIONER: ASWATHY R.V., RESIDING AT ASWATHY, PULIMOOTTUNADA, MUDAVOORPARA, VEDIVACHANKOVIL P.O.,BALARAMAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.L.MOHANAN SMT.LIGEY ANTONY RESPONDENTS: 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL). 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,NEYYATTINKARA 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEYYATTINKARA. 4. R. SIVANANDAN, RESIDING AT REMANIVILASOM, VALIYAVILAKOM, NEAR RAMAPURAM DEVI TEMPLE, ARALULMMOODU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. REAMANI, RESIDING AT -DO-- DO-. 6. JAYESHKUMAR S.R., RESIDING AT -DO- -DO-. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.M. KAMMAPPU SRI.C.K.MOHANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE DATED 29.8.2006. EXT.P2 COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF THE CHILD DATED 20.6.2007 EXT.P3 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL. // TRUE COPY // P.S. TO JUDGE. KNC/- P.R. RAMAN & V. K. MOHANAN, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(CRL) NO. 30 OF 2008 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 2008. J U D G M E N T Raman, J. Petitioner alleges that she is married to one Jayakumar, who is the son of respondents 4 and 5 and brother of 6th Respondent. According to her, after marriage, she was taken to her husband's paternal house and she was there till 5.4.2007. Now her husband is found missing and she alleges that he is under the illegal custody of Respondents 4 to 6. 2. A counter affidavit is filed by Respondents 4 to 6 denying the allegations. As per the averments made in the counter affidavit, petitioner left her marital home on 5.4.2007 for delivery and thereafter she refused to come back and her relationship with her husband Jayakumar became strained. 3. At any rate, it is now revealed that the petitioner's husband has gone abroad. If so, leaving open the right of the petitioner to take such other remedies as are available to her under law and also to approach this court later in case occasion arises, this writ petition is closed. P.R. RAMAN, (JUDGE) V. K. MOHANAN, (JUDGE) knc/-