m K-: HEGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : MILASPUR SJNGLEBENCH:HON'BLESHR1S.R.NAYAK,CJ. WritPetitionNo. 530 OF 2002. PETITiONER Tukaram, I 1 S43.ShriPremSin^h,50years,R/G. i; The. C^ongarsarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.O.) Vs. RESPONDENTS 1. Steteof Chhattisgjarh, | ThrQugh|:TheSe^retary, P^nchayat&Soc^lWeEfareDeptt., Rajpur (Chhattisg^rh) | 2. TheAdditionaJ CQjlector, T Rajnandgaon, (C.^5.) j 3. TheSubiDivisionalOfficerCum Compet^nent Aut^iority, Dongargarh, Distt, Rajnandgao'n, (Chhattisgarh). 4. Thje Chief ExecutiVe Olffjcer Jahpad Panchayajli Dohgai^arh, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G|.). -tl" i... Present: Shri Prafijl! Bharat, learned oounsei fc|tthe petitioner. Shn Uttersh Verma, leamedj Dy. G.A.j for the ^tate. ^••—•<-.«.—.»•»«. i. ies^me impugned ORALORDER (Passed on 26fh Jun©2006) At the time 6f hearing, It transpired that agatp^t t^< order, the petitioner had preferred a revision to the Aacijti6nal Cotlector, Rajnandgaon and the said revision was|disrhjssed. jlfth^ petitioner is aggrieved by the order made in the revislon, he shoulcj take appropriate steps to assaii the correctness of the same. The{order jmpugned in this writ petition has merged wlth the order made in the revlisior^. Jn that view ii ofthe matter, the v/rit petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Sd/- Chief Justice