IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34253 of 2008 NIRAJ RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 11.11.2008 Heard Sri Hare Krishan Prasad, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case is under Section 366A IPC and relates to the alleged enticement to young girls from their house. One of the girls Chunni Kumar appears making the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C and clearly implicating the petitioner with all fours. The contention is that in her statement before police under Section 161 Cr.P.C she had not made the statement like one she made before the Magistrate and rather stated that she had herself gone out and married the petitioner. The court is not inclined to act upon the statement of the girl under Section 161 Cr.P.C and has no option but to place reliance upon her statement recorded by a Magistrate and considering that I am not inclined to direct the release of the petitioner on bail. Petition is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )