IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6312 of 2007 Date of decision : December 07, 2007 Shakuntla alias Kunta ....Petitioner versus Amar Singh and another ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pritam Pal Present : Mr. B.R.Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner Pritam Pal,J. (Oral) Petitioner has brought this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside order dated 1.12.2007 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Hisar, whereby the application of the petitioner for adducing the evidence in rebuttal or in the alternative to produce additional evidence was dismissed with costs of Rs 1000/-. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and going through the impugned order it is apparent that petitioner, who is plaintiff before the trial court, wants to adduce evidence in rebuttal or in the alternative additional evidence on the issue, the onus of which was upon her (plaintiff/petitioner) which is not permissible under the law. I find no illegality or impropriety in the impugned order. Dismissed in limine. ( Pritam Pal ) December 07, 2007 Judge 'dalbir'