IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2011 / 29TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19074 of 2011(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. SWALIHA, AGED 24, W/O.MUHAMMED ROSHAN, MANAKULANGARA HOUSE, MULAKKUZHA P.O., CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-689505. 2. RAZEENA BEEVI M.S., AGED 49, D/O.SULAIMAN M.K., MANAKULANGARA HOUSE, MULAKKUZHA P.O., CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-689505. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.IBRAHIM SMT.K.P.AMBIKA SRI.UDAYAKUMAR SREEDHARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695001 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHENGANNUR POLICE STATION.689122 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARANMULA.689533 4. ARAVINDAKSHAN NAIR, AISHWARYA, KOTTA P.O., KARAKKAD, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.689504 ADV. SRI.N.ASHOK KUMAR FOR R-4 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.V.SABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.19074/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE DATED 19/11/2010. EXT.2: COPY OF THE LETTER ADDRESSED TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT SENT BY REGISTERED POST BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWARON TO BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC DATED 2/7/2011. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT REPORTED IN AIR 2006 SC 2522 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: EXT.R4(A): COPY OF FIR IN CIME NO.528/11 OF ARANMULA POLICE STATION DATED 11/7/2011. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No.19074 OF 2011 ------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Sri.P.K.Ibrahim learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to the interim order, which was passed by this court on 14/7/2011, the 2nd respondent conducted an enquiry and on the basis of his findings in the enquiry, afforded adequate protection for the lives of the petitioners. 2. Heard Sri.N.Ashok Kumar learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent also. There is no serious objection from anybody else in the matter of continuing the interim order. Under the above circumstances, the interim order dated 14/7/2011 is made absolute. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE dpk