IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 21ST JANUARY 2008 / 1ST MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 245 of 2008(D) ------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------ C.ANIL KUMAR, PROVISIONAL CONDUCTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KASARAGOD DEPOT, KASARAGOD. BY ADV. SRI.K.SHRIHARI RAO SMT.N.SHOBHA RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, TRIVANDRUM. BY SRI.K.PRABHAKARAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ======================= W.P.(C) No. 245 of 2008(D) ======================= Dated this the 21st day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner who is stated to have been working as a provisional conductor in the 2nd respondent Corporation from 1999 onwards, claims to regularisation in service as in the case of certain other similarly placed provisional conductors. Raising this claim, petitioner has filed Ext.P3 representation before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the same. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader and the standing counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there would be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as 2nd respondent. However, I make it clear that I have not W.P.(C) No. 245/2008/D -2- considered the claim of the petitioner on merits and it would be for the 1st respondent to decide the question on the basis of the law prevailing on the subject. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE jp