1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6710/2009 M/s.Balaji Minerals Versus Union of India and others Date of order ::: May 29,2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PREM SHANKER ASOPA Mr.S.M.Mehta, Sr.Advocate with Mr.R.S.Mehta, for the petitioner Mr.Dinesh Yadav, Addl. AG BY THE COURT (1) Issue notice to the respondents. (2) Mr.Dinesh Yadav, Addl.AG is directed to accept the notices. (3) With the consent of counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being finally disposed of at admission stage. (4) By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the orders dated 13.4.2009, 19.5.2009/22.5.2009 whereby report was sought from the Assistant Conservator of Forests with regard to compliance of the order of the Supreme Court dated 8.4.2005 and in the endorsement, it has been stated that all the mining leases renewed after 16.12.2002 shall be closed within a period of three days. (5) Counsel for the petitioner submits that the 2 State Government is acting contrary to the order dated 8.4.2005 while passing the orders dated 19.5.2009/22.5.2009. Counsel further submits that there is no other order issued in respect of the renewal of the mining lease after 8.4.2005. (6) Counsel for the State submits that renewal is not permitted in the forest area as per the order dated 8.4.2005 and otherwise also, there may be subsequent order of the Supreme Court. (7) I have gone through record of the writ petition and further considered rival submission of counsel for the parties. (8) In my view, the matter requires re- consideration, therefore, the respondents are directed to reconsider the entire issue in the light of the Supreme Court order dated 8.4.2005 and other order of the Supreme Court, if any, and further pass speaking order within a period of fifteen days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. (9) The writ petition is disposed of. (PREM SHANKER ASOPA) J. Gopal