IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29661 of 2010 GHANSHYAM YADAV & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 01.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the state assisted by the informant. Admittedly, one F.I.R. named accused, namely, Ajay Yadav @ Bhulla has been grated privilege of bail by this court vide order dated 08.11.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 24940 of 2010 and the case of petitioners, namely, Pramod Yadav, Chandan @ Chain Yadav , Mantu Yadav and Bhola Yadav stands on similar footing to that of co- accused, Ajay Yadav @ Bhulla. So far as case of petitioner No. 1, Ghanshyam yadav is concerned, admittedly, his name has been figured in the statement of witness, Jitendra Kumar which is evident from perusal of para-40 of the case diary. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, prayer for bail of the petitioner, Ghanshyam Yadav stands rejected. However, he may renew his prayer for bail after six months. So far rest petitioners, namely, Pramod Yadav, Chandan @ Chain Yadav , Mantu Yadav and Bhola Yadav are concerned, they are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with 2 two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 335 of 2009 to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh. The condition imposed upon accused, Ajay Yadav @ Bhulla Yadav vide order dated 18.11.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 24940 of 2010 shall apply to the above said petitioners. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)