IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No. 1323-C of 2006 and RSA No. 628 of 2006 Date of Decision: 04.11. 2008 Mehnga Ram ...... Appellant Versus Jagir Chand and another ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Deepak Arora, Advocate for the appellant. **** Ajay Tewari, J. CM No. 1323-C of 2006 For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 201 days in refiling the appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of. RSA No. 628 of 2006 The plaintiff-appellant had filed a suit for declaration and injunction on the basis of ownership. Both the Courts below found against the plaintiff on the ground of possession as well as ownership. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to show to me that the findings of fact are so perverse as to be said to be not arising from the evidence. RSA No. 628 of 2006 -2- No other point has been urged. Accordingly this appeal is dismissed, however,with no order as to costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE November 04, 2008 sunita