1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA NO.383/2011 IN WP NO.9154/2010 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.VB Patil, Adv. for applicant/intervenor; Mr.PM Shah, Sr.Counsel h/for Mr. Sandeep Deshmukh, Adv. for Respondent. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL,J. DATE : 14 th November, 2011. 1) Heard Mr.Patil and Mr. Shah for the respective parties. 2) The applicant/intervenor – Suryakant Patil desires to be impleaded him as a party in the proceedings and allow him to intervene in the matter. 3) On going through the record, I find, intervention of applicant – Suryakant is not warranted as the controversy is revolving between the writ petitioner and the State and other competent authorities, including Municipal Corporation, Jalgaon. 4) Consequently, Civil Application for intervention is rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE 2 bdv/