IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14131 of 2011 1. Sonamati Devi, wife of Anirudh Thakur @ Anrudh Thakur. 2. Anrudh Thakur @ Anirudh Thakur, son of Late Fagu Thakur. 3. Akhilesh Kumar, son of Anirudh Thakur @ Anrudh Thakur. All residents of village- Dhira Bigha, P.S. Makhdumpur, O.P. Tehta, District- Jehanabad…………………………………………………………………...Petitioners. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Guriya Devi, wife of Akhilesh Kumar, D/O resident of village- Dhira Bigha, P.S. Makhdumpur, P.O. Tehta, District- Jehanabad, Parental Address at present village- Orail, P.S. Wazirganj, District-Gaya…………………………………………Opposite parties. ----------- 2. 03.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the parents of the husband and the husband are apprehending their arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the D. P. Act. The petitioner no.3, husband is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioner no.3 has not performed second marriage. Considering the aforesaid stand, let the petitioner no. 3 above named, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for six months and petitioner nos. 1 and 2 2 above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 254 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned court below will issue notice to the complainant and on her appearance the petitioner no.3 will take back the complainant to her matrimonial home to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour. The provisional bail of the petitioner no.3 will be confirmed by the learned court below on substantial restoration of matrimonial harmony or the complainant refuses to reside with the petitioner no.3. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)