MC 3064/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.UPADHYAY Heard Ms. B. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the appellant-applicants. Non e appears on behalf of the respondents despite proper service of notice. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 filed by the appellant-applicants seeking condonation of delay of 32 days in preferring the c onnected second appeal. Perused the application. Learned counsel for the appellant-applicants stated that the reasons for delay h ave been explained in para-4 of the present application. On careful perusal of the application, I find that sufficient reason has been sh own for condoning the delay. Accordingly, accepting the reasons mentioned in th e application, the delay of 32 days in filing the connected second appeal is her eby condoned. Misc. application accordingly stands disposed of.