Criminal Misc. No.M-19475 of 2008 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-19475 of 2008 Date of decision : 1.9.2008 Med Ram .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. H.S.Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.M.Mor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State. S. D. ANAND, J. The parole plea of the petitioner-prisoner was declined by the competent authority by observing that the provisions of Section 32 of the N.D.P.S. Act bar it and also because the petitioner has not become eligible for his release on parole in view of instructions contained in Memo No. 38/10/94/1JJ (ii) dated 15.3.1999 The plea raised thereby is that it is only on the petitioner-prisoner's earning his first good conduct remission that he would become entitled to his release on parole. Insofar as the first resistance is concerned, it was negatived by judgment of a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Writ No. 1157 of 2006 (Sukhwinder Singh @ Titto Vs. State of Punjab) decided on 10.8.2007. Insofar as the other part of the averment is concerned, the competent authority is directed to dispose of the agriculture Criminal Misc. No.M-19475 of 2008 -2- **** parole plea of the petitioner afresh, within a period of one month from today. This order does not, in any manner, suggest any relaxation on point of eligibility of the petitioner-prisoner which may be adjudged on the touch stone of the instructions/rules in the relevant behalf. Disposed of accordingly. September 01, 2008 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE