THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 7047 of 2007 Dated: 01.11.2007 Between: Jyasta China Satyanarayana … Petitioner AND The Government of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary to the Revenue (L.A.) Dept., Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad, & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana Counsel for the respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 7047 of 2007 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “… … Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to deposit the entire compensation of amount payable to the petitioner pursuant to judgment dated 20.08.1999 in Appeal No.529 of 1992 on the file of this Hon’ble Court, to the credit of E.P.No.135 of 1990 in O.P.No.53 of 1987 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Kovvur and pass such other orders or order as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” Today the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition handed over a copy of the affidavit filed by Smt. N. Seetha Mahalakshmi, Revenue Divisional Officer, Jangareddygudem, West Godavari District, in which she has undertaken as under: “It is further submitted that when the writ petition came up for hearing on 29.10.2007 and this Hon’ble Court directed the respondents in the writ petition either to deposit the amount or give an undertaking with reference to depositing of the decretal charges in the above E.P. In due obedience to the orders of the Hon’ble High Court I am hereby giving an undertaking to deposit the decretal charges in the Court below in EP.No.135/1990 in O.P.No.53/1987 in WP.No.7047 of 2007 within six weeks from 29.10.2007 and file the receipt in the Hon’ble High Court.” The affidavit is taken on record. In view of the undertaking given by the Revenue Divisional Officer, the writ petition is closed. The petitioner is given liberty to seek revival of the writ petition and also to initiate action in the event of violation of the above-reproduced undertaking. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition as closed, WPMP.No.8966 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 01.11.2007 ES