IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9646 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.04.2011 Naveen ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Present petition is filed seeking regular bail in case FIR No.335 dated 26.6.2009 under Sections 148/149/307/120-B IPC and Sections25/54/59 of the Arms Act, Police Station City Sonepat, Distt. Sonepat. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that initially challan was filed against two accused, who are already on bail and petitioner has been summoned to face trial under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel further states that petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed before the learned trial Court. Learned counsel further states that since other two accused have already been enlarged on bail, hence, petitioner is entitled for bail. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, states that it is correct that other two co-accused are on bail. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct that petitioner be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. (Alok Singh) Judge April 18, 2011 R.S.