IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINTIAL Writ Petition No. 628 of 2003 (M/B) Rameshwar Prasad and another ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Uttaranchal and others ……….Respondents Mr. Manish Dalakoti, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 1. None for respondents 2 and 3. Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble M. M. Ghildiyal J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Manish Dalakoti, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for the respondents no. 1. None for respondents 2 and 3. 2. Mr. Manish Dalakoti, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition, now, has become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 29.03.2006 29.03.2006 A