8mm 3mm @ IN THE HmH coukT OF CHHATTIseARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. /2oos /" PETITIONER: / Narmada Prasad Mishra, son of LaTe R.P. Mishra, aged abquf 54 years, residem‘ of 28/471; Shriram Nagar, Phase~II, Raipur. / CF-(aég, Vs RS: / 1. STa‘fz of, Chha‘rfisgarh Through; The Secre‘rar‘y, Minisfry of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. .The CollecTor, Raipur. .The DisTricT Educa'rion Officer, Raipur'. /4. Shri Pankaj Nirmalkar, Corporafor, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Ward, Municipal Raipur‘ & Présidenf of Janbhagidari & Vikas Sami'ri, Fundhar‘, Raipur'. ‘ / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. Corporation, ESPONDENT XI-HC-78 311%“ mm matqi%?fan%¥r &:31%113n%¥r 30-8-2006 Mr. 8P. Sharma. counsel far ’rhe pe‘mioner. L e Mr. Vinny Pandey, Panel r for 1'he SfaTe/respondents No.1 'ro 3, on advance copy. Heard bo1'h The counsel. By The insiam- writ ifion under Articles 226 & 227 of 1’he Cons‘ri‘ru‘rion of India, The pefi‘ti ner has challenged his Transfer order dafed 14-8-2006 (Annexure P-1), wher by he has been Transferred from Govt Middle Schoal. Fundhar, Raipur 1'0 Go . Higher Secondary School, Rohansi, Block: Polari, Disfric‘r: Roipur. The c‘ase of the pefifio r is fho‘r he is holding The posT of Head MasTer, GovT. Middle School, F ndhar. The peTiTianer while discharging his duTies as Head MasTer, has b en aTToched wiTh The ConTinuous EducaTion ‘5aTaT 5hiksha Abhiyan' and has furTher been aTTached wiTh The DisTricT LIT racy CommiTTee Office, Raipur as ProjecT Officer Copy of The order o This effecT is Annexure P—4. IT is The apprehensmn of The peTITioner ThaT he has become VicTIm of The dispuTe beTween Two agencies of The STaTe as a resulT of which he has been Transferred by The Impugned ord r which Is mala flde and arbITrory. In The circumsTonces, le ned counsel for The peTiTioner submiTs ThaT The peTiTioner may be allowed To make a represenTaTion To respondenT No.1 and respondenT No.1 be direcTed T decide The some To which learned counsel appearing for The 5TaTe/r'espond nTs No.1 To 3 has no abjecTion. Programme of The STaTe known P.T.O. 'r Xl—HC—78 @ WWW WWW ~—Q_ wawf'kam WWffwm $31fa‘trwléw Soma ~\ r Having heard learned counsel for 1he parfies, having regard To fhe fads and circumsfanoes of The case (ind wifhou‘l' expressing any opinion an meri‘r of fhe case, The prayer made by lewned counsel for The peTiTioner is jusT, fair and reasonable. represenTaTion raising all his gr evances, annexing a copy of This wriT peTiTion and iTs annexures To respondenp' No.1 wiThin 10 days from Today and in Turn, decide The represenTaTion of The peTiTioner The daTe of its receipT, afTer considering The objecTions raised by The peTiTioner in an objecTive manner, in accordance wiTh law. peTiTioner is allowed To make a deToiled Therefore, fhe respondenT No.1 is diree’red To wiThin a period of 3O days from WiTh The direcTion afore: ConsequenTly, M.(W.)P.Nc ParTies are enTiTled for c said, The peTiTion sTands disposed of. 3554/2006 also sTands disposed of. erTified copy of This order. l Sdl— L.C. Bhadoo Judge P.T.O. wP(§).‘J.§.?7: . .. In 200g WW(W)