IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12857 of 2010 ARJUN RAI Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 07.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. There is enmity in between the parties. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., nor in the further statement and named after a week of the incident in the statement under Section 164 of the Cr. P.C. but not, as an assailant rather member of the mob. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Alipur P.S. Case No. 16 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gaya subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)