IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 2ND AUGUST 2011 / 11TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 20960 of 2011(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- ANUJ R., S/O. N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, ABHIRAMAM, DERA-72, PALKULANGARA, TC 29/751(1), PETTAH P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 024. BY ADV. SMT.SREEDEVI KYLASANATH SMT.SHALEENA RAJAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CUSAT P.O., COCHIN-682 020. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, CUSAT P.O., COCHIN-682 020. ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,COCHI U FOR R1-2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.20960/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: True copy of petitioner's course completion certificate from Srarabhai Institute of Science and Technology. Ext.P1(a): true copy of 3rd semester examination result on the subject Electrical Technology published by the 1st respondent. EXT.P2: True copy of petitioner's application for revaluation of the paper Electrical Technology. Ext.P2(a): True copy of petitioner's application for scrutiny of the paper Electrical Technology. EXT.P3: True copy of the chalan receipt showing the remittance of revaluation fee of Ext.P2 of petitioner. Ext.P3(a): True copy of the chalan receipt showing the remittance of scrutiny fee of Ext.P2(a) of the petitioner. EXT.P4: True copy of the judgment dated 18.8.2010 in WP(C). 26047/2010. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 20960 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 3rd Semester examination was declared, he had failed in one paper viz., Electrical Technology. He applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp