IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4180 of 1996 1. Rajesh Kumar S/o Sri Radha Krishna Prasad Village- P.O.-Manpur, District-Sitamarhi 2. Pramod Kumar S/o Sri Satyanarayan Prasad, Village- Jawahar Chaock, District-Sitamarhi 3. Rishi Kumar Son of Sri Yogendra Thakur village P.O. Manik Chowk, Runnisaidpur, Dist.-Sitamarhi 4. Ajit Kumar Son of Sri Vasisth narayan Khirhar, Village- Amghatta, Dumra Dist.-Sitamarhi 5. Vinod Kumar Jha son of Sri Ajit Lal Jha, village- Shantinagar, Dumra, Dist.-Sitamarhi. 6. Sanjay Kumar Sinha son of late Vindbasani Prasad Village-Nanpur, district-Sitamarhi 7. Ram Bhagat Paswan son of Yogi Paswan, Village- Sihbahini, Sonbarsa 8. Rambabu Singh son of Sri Sakal Deo Singh, Village- Bhavdepur, District-Sitamarhi. 9. Khursidh Anwar Son of late kamrujama, village- Bhagwatipur, Admghatta, Dumra, District. 10. Mahesh Kumar son of Sri Laxmi Kant Prasad, village- Aajamgarh, P.O.-Lagama, Dumra, Dist. 11. Pankaj Kumar son of Nageshwar Pd. Singh, Villlage- Vishwanathpur, Dumra, District-Sitamarhi 12. Gobind Kumar Jha son of Late Rajendra Jha village- Madhopur, P.O.-Bathnaha District-Sitimarhi 13. Krishan Nandan Singh son of late Jhulan Prasad Singh village-Rebasi, P.O.-Rebasi, Riga, Dist. –Sitamarhi 14. Arun Kumar Gupta son of Sri Vishnu Deo Prasad Gupta village-Banouli, P.O.-Sursand, District-Sitamarhi 15. Ratneshwar Pd. Son of Sri Ragh Krishna Prasad at & P.O. Nanpur District-Sitamarhi 16. Suresh Thakur son of Ram Swarth Thakur of village- Sautiniya, P.O.-Parihar, Dist.-Sitamarhi. 17. Abhay Kumar Bhardwaz son of Dujendra Pd. Singh, Village-Morsand, P.O.-Runnisaidpur, Dist.-Sitamarhi. Versus 1. The Chief G.M., (Sales) B.C.C.L., Koyala Bhawan, Koyala Nagar, Dhanbad. 2. The Secretary and Commissioner, Food, Civil Supply & Commerce Deptt. Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The State of Bihar. ---------------------------------- 5. 18.10.2011 Nobody appears for the petitioners when the case is called out. Learned counsel appearing for the 2 respondent no. 1 is present. Yesterday also when the case was called out nobody had appeared for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 had submitted that the case has become infructuous since a policy relating to slack coal had under gone a lot of change. In view of the aforesaid accepting the contention of the learned counsel for respondent no. 1 the case is disposed off as having become infructuous. Anand Kr. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)