1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1 44/2009 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Shri S.S. Jadhavar, Advocate for appellants. Shri J.V. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.1 Shri U.N. Shete, Advocate for respondent no.2. ........................... [CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J ] DATE : 02ND FEBRUARY, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Heard the learned counsel. 2 The refusal of injunction below Ex.5 in Special civil suit No.336/2009 recorded by learned II Joint Civil Judge (Senior Division), Aurangabad is questioned by the original plaintiff / appellant. 3 The factual matrix about the purchase of the property laying its plots executing power of attorney by plaintiff 2 in favour of other co-owners and dealing by those persons based on the power of attorney in respect of several plots is not in controversy. The plaintiff asserts that power of attorney is terminated, still there are suspected and apprehended negotiations entered by the respondents /defendants, which may be the root cause for further litigation on behalf of such a purchaser. 4 Though the submissions are rosy in it’s nature but difficult to act upon as the very velocity therein is diminished in terms of section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. The proper procedure under the said Act can be translated by the plaintiff with competent authorities of registration to register the lis. No merit. Appeal from order dismissed. No cost. Civil application also disposed of. [ K.U. CHANDIWAL, J ] tskao144.09