1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR W.P.5195 of 2008 (Purushottam Patil ..V/s.. Madhukarrao Umrerkar +2) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. M.I. Dhatrak, counsel for petitioner. Mr. P.A. Abhyankar, counsel for respondent no.1 and 2. CORAM:- A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED:- 11 th AUGUST, 2009. 1. Both the Courts below have concurrently held that petitioner is not entitled for grant of injunction against the erection of tower for mobile connectivity for mobile phones. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner the waves are harmful to the human body. 2. Per contra, Mr. Abhyankar, learned counsel for the contesting respondent, submits that the judgment of the Kerala High Court is otherwise. 3. Heard learned Advocates for the rival parties. The issue involved in the suit being is of urgent nature it is necessary to make workable arrangement in the interest of petitioner. In the result I make the following order. a. Writ Petition is disposed of. 2 b. Trial Court is directed to expedite the Regular Suit No.21 of 2008 and decide the same in any case within 6 months from today. c. parties to co-operate. d. No orders as to costs. JUDGE nvt.