1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 82 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.530 OF 2005 Union of India & Others ...Petitioners Versus P.L.Mukhija ...Respondent Mr. Ravi Shetty a/w. H.V.Mehta & N.D.Sharma i/b. Dr.T..C.Kaushik for Petitioners. Mr. M.I.Sethna, Sr. Advocate a/w. J.B.Mishra for Respondent CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED:- 20th JULY, 2011. P.C. 1. By this motion, the respondent prays for directions against the writ petitioners to pay/release all the post retirement benefits, including gratuity, commutation of pension etc to the respondent with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of super annuation till realisation and for further direction to regularize her pension. 2. As the writ petition has been dismissed, it necessarily follows that 2 decision of the tribunal has been upheld. The consequences flowing from the said decision will have to be given effect to by the petitioners. 3. If there are any further issues, the respondent is free to pursue such other remedy as may be permissible in law. 4. Needless to observe that the order of the Tribunal will have to be implemented by the department (of the petitioners), within a reasonable time. 5. Motion disposed of accordingly. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)