IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3019 of 2009 1. KADAM ALI 2. HAROON RASHID, BOTH SONS OF LATE RUSTAM ALI 3. MD. YASIN, SON OF LAT LIYAKAT ALI 4. MD. DADRUDDIN, SON OF LAT SARAFAT ALI, ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE – CHARGHARIA, P. O. – JHALA, P.S. – TERAGACH, DISTRICT – KISHANGANJ. ................. PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR, KISHANGANG. 3. CIRCLE OFFICER, TERHAGHAT, P.S. – TERAHAGHAT, DISTRICT – KISHANGANJ. 4. SAHIRUDDIN, SON OF MABOOD BAKSH 5. KALIMUDDIN, SON OF MABOOD BAKSH 6. KALU BAKSH, SON OF MABOOD BAKSH 7. KHENUDDIN, SON OF DEWAN 8. IFTESAR ALI, SON OF RUSTAM ALI ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHARGHARIA, P.O. – JHALA, P.S. TERAGACH, DISTT. – KISHANGANJ. .......................... RESPONDENTS ----------- 2. 17.3.2009 After having heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State, this court is not inclined to entertain the present writ application at this stage because the petitioners, who have statutory remedy against the impugned decision. The writ application stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioners that they can invoke the jurisdiction of appeal if so advised. If limitation comes into play, they have freedom to file limitation petition and explain the delay, which if found cogent by the appellate - 2 - authority will consider condoning the same and the matter will be decided thereafter. DKS/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)