IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31000 of 2008 BECHU RAVIDAS, Son of Jamuna Ravidas, Resident of Village- Garhi, P.S.- Khaira, District- Jamui :------ Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR:-----Opposite Party. ----------- For the petitioner :Mr. Prakash Mahto, Advocate. For the Opposite Party :Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwari, A.P.P. ====== 4. 19.12.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 392 and 411 of the Penal Code and is named in the First Information Report in connection with snatching of a motorcycle. He has been named by those who were near the place of occurrence at the time of occurrence. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that informant has claimed in the First Information Report that he can identify the culprit but the petitioner was never put on Test Identification Parade. Aforesaid submission cannot be taken into account at this stage. This application is, accordingly, rejected, however, considering the fact that petitioner’s antecedent is absolutely clean it is directed that his trial (Khaira P.S.Case No. 56 of 2006) be expedited and concluded at the earliest, in any case within six months from today, otherwise petitioner will have the liberty to renew his prayer for bail. Let this order be communicated to the court below (Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui) through fax by the office of this Court for ensuring completion of the trial within the time indicated in this order and the court below must submit the report after conclusion of the trial. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)