IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.297 OF 2006 IN APPEAL (LDG.) NO.34 OF 2006 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.229 OF 1993 IN AWARD NO.77 OF 1993 M/s.Michigan Engineers Pvt. Ltd. ....Applicant V/s. Municipal Corpn. of Gr. Bombay ....Respondents Mr.Bagla i/b M/s.Bagla Dandekar & Co. for the Applicant. Mr.Zaikwad for the Respondents. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 18TH MARCH, 2006. P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and the Respondents. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bona-fide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)