IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.22575 of 1995 Between: 1 M/s Satyanarayana Traders, Unit Sitarama Rice Mill, Rep by its Partner U. Panduranga Rao, S/o Krishna Murthy, R/o Dosapadu Village, Krishna Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The AP State Electricity Board, rep by its Secretary, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintending Engineer, (Assessments), APSEB, PWD, Grounds, Vijayawada. 3 The Asst.Divisional Engineer, Operation, APSEB, Gudivada. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus by declaring that the proceedings in Lr.No.ADE/O/GDV ASO F Docket D.No.1178/95, dt.5.10.95 of the 3rd respondent as illegal and unenforceable and by directing the respondents to restore the supply of electricity to the petitioners mill bearing service connection No.83, Dosapadu forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT.K.SESHARAJYAM Counsel for the Respondents: (SC FOR A.P.TRANSCO) The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner represents that the cause in this writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become ‘infructuous’. No costs. _________________ (N.V. RAMANA, J) Date: 05.10.2004 Nsr To 1 The Secretary, AP State Electricity Board, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintending Engineer, (Assessments), APSEB, PWD, Grounds, Vijayawada. 3 The Asst.Divisional Engineer, Operation, APSEB, Gudivada. 4 Two CD copies.