IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.548 of 2011 1. Nisha Kumari wife of Sri Pravendra Kumar Jha, resident of village- Salempur, P.S. Musrigharari in the district of Samastipur 2. Satya Jyoti Kumar, son of Sri Satish Chandra Ray, resident of village- Salempur, P.S. Musrigharari in the district of Samastipur ……… Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The Member, District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Samastipur 3. The Joint Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4. The Director, Primary Edication, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 5. The District Magistrate, Samastipur 6. The District Superintendent of Education, Samastipur 7. The Block Development Officer, Sarai Ranjan, District- Samastipur 8. The Block Education Extension Officer, Sarai Ranjan, District-Samastipur 9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Barbatta, Block- Sarai Ranjan, District-Samastipur 10. Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Barbatta, Block Sarai Ranjan, District-Samastipur 11. The Headmaster, Upgraded Middle School, Milki Suapakar, P.S. Musrigharari, Block-Sarai Ranjan, District-Samastipur 12. The Headmaster, Primary School, Salempur Barbatta, , P.S. Musrigharari, Block-Sarai Ranjan, District- Samastipur 13. Ashwini Kumar Ray, son of Aditya Kumar Ray, at present posted as Panchayat Shikshak in Upgraded Middle School, Salempur Barbatta, P.S. Musrigharari, Block Sarai Ranjan, District- Samastipur 14. Ratnamala Kumari, D/o Late Birbal Mahto, at present posted as Panchayat Shikshak in Upgraded Middle School, Milki Suapakar, P.S. Musrigharari, Block Sarai Ranjan, District- Samastipur ----------- 2 2. 26.7.2011 Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ application so that the petitioners may pursue the matter before the authorities themselves in the light of any directives that may have been issued in regard to cases like that of the petitioners and keeping in view the fact that the petitioners have worked for nearly two years and vacancies are available. The writ application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. S.Pandey ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)