wp3979-11.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3979 OF 2011 Pandu Murlidhar Bulhe .. Petitioner Versus Dnyaneshwar Kisan Bulhe deceased through Lrs. .. Respondents Mr.Rameshwar Gite for petitioner Mr.Sachin Chavan for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 Mr.S.N.Bhosale, AGP for respondent Nos. 4 and 5 CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 13th July 2011. P.C.: 1] After hearing Mr.Gite at some length and perusing with his assistance the concurrent impugned orders, I am of the opinion that no interference is necessary therewith and these orders in no way affect the final outcome of the pending proceedings before the civil court. If the case of the petitioner is that there was no road in existence then that issue can be examined by civil court on the basis of oral and documentary evidence placed before it. It is not as if the impugned orders wp3979-11.doc 2 and any observations therein would continue to bind civil court. In such circumstances and finding that on the basis of the materials produced the authorities have concurrently held that their jurisdiction under the Mamlatdar Court's Act had to be exercised, there is no reason to interfere with this conclusion. Petition dismissed. No costs. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)