BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Fourth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.10459 of 2011 K.REVATHI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED 2 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARAVAYAL POLICE STATION, DEVAKOTTAI TALUK CIRCLE, ( CRIME NO.116 OF 2011 ) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.VIJAYASHANTHI Advocate For Respondent : MR. A. RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as A2 and she was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.07.2011 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 306 IPC, in Crime No. 116 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2. The petitioner is the wife of the deceased who is the second accused. The first accused is her father. It is stated that the petitioner was in her parents house and the first accused demanded three lakhs from the parents of deceased to send her daughter to the matrimonial house. Hence, he committed suicide. 3. Mrs. S. Vijayashanthi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the deceased was suffering from behavioural abnormality which could be evident from MRI Scan report, that due to depression he committed suicide, that in FIR lodged by the mother of the deceased there is nothing mentioned about the alleged demand of three lakhs, that the petitioner is having 2 ½ years old female child which is with the mother of the petitioner and that the presence of the petitioner is very much essential for the child. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor records objections stating https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ that the investigation is pending and that the suicide note written by the deceased would show that there was a demand of three lakhs from the petitioner side. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, that the petitioner is in custody from 28.07.2011, that she is a lady and she has to look after the tender child and that if the petitioner is released on bail there may not be any possibility in tampering the witnesses, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her executing a bond for a sum of RS. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Devakottai, and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. sd/- 24/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DEVAKOTTAI 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARAVAYAL POLICE STATION, DEVAKOTTAI TALUK CIRCLE, 5 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL PRISON, FOR WOMEN, TRICHY. 1. CC to M/S. S.VIJAYASHANTHI Advocate SR.No.28813: DM::2011:AUGUST:24:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10459 of 2011 Date :24/08/2011 2P:7c:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/