IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT TUESDAY, THE 15TH JANUARY 2008 / 25TH POUSHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 1730 of 2007(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.178/2007 Dated 08/06/2007 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP -------------------------------------------- SUBAIDA V.M., W/O.SHAMSUDEEN, AGED 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT MATHILAKATHUVEETTIL, THIRUNELLOOR P.O., POOVATHOOR, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO RESPONDENTS: 3RD RESPONDENT IN WPC ---------------------------------- T.CHANDRAN, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER), SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.1.08 , THE COURT ON 15/01/2008 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Cont. Case (C) No. 1730 OF 2007 S ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 15th day of January, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner alleges that the respondent has committed contempt in willfully not complying with the judgment dated 8.6.07 in W.P.(C) No.178/07. The learned Public Prosecutor points out that the order has been complied with in substance though there has been an omission to give notice to the petitioner of such compliance. 2. Having considered all the relevant circumstances, I am satisfied that it is not necessary to proceed in contempt against the respondent herein, the order having been substantially complied with. This contempt case is, in these circumstances, closed as unnecessary. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) aks