THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY C.C. No.1089 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner filed W.P.No.14301 of 2008 before this Court complaining that the respondents in the writ petition are forcibly evicting it from an extent of Ac.0.05 cents of land in Sy.No.313/5, adjacent to chariot of the Temple at Kanipakam. After hearing the parties, the writ petition was disposed of on 06.09.2008, with certain directions. The directions are to the effect that a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- to be deposited before the possession is taken, inmates of the shops be permitted to take away belongings and after possession is taken, and further steps in the form of providing alternative site or extending monetary benefits shall be extended in accordance with the prescribed procedure. The petitioners state that though a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- is deposited by the respondents, as directed by this Court, the relief as to providing alternative site or monetary compensation was not extended. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the respondents and the learned Government Pleader for Endowments. The directions issued by this Court comprise of different steps. It is not in dispute that the respondents deposited an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- as directed by this Court and that the premises has been vacated by the petitioners. What remains to be done is, the determination of the nature of compensation to be extended to the displaced persons, whether in the form of alternative land or monetary compensation. It is brought to the notice of this Court that some other persons have filed O.S.No.681 of 2008 in the Court of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Chittoor, claiming relief vis-à-vis the land taken over by the respondents. In that view of the matter, the respondents cannot be expected to finalise the matter. Therefore, the contempt case is closed. It is directed that extension of further relief provided in the order in writ petition to the persons, who are held to be entitled, in the decree that may be passed in O.S.No.681 of 2008, would depend upon the out come of the said suit. ______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J Date: 10.08.2009 sj