IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 6839 of 2007. Date of Decision: 27th January, 2009. Adish Gupta ...Petitioner through Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority & Anr. Respondents through Mr. R.S.Longia, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) The petitioner impugns the demand notice dated 18th April, 2007 [Annexure P-12] whereby some additional payments have been demanded from him for Plot No. 52, Sector 55, Gurgaon. Notice of motion was issued and in response thereto, a counter-affidavit and rejoinder thereto have been filed. During the course of hearing, it transpires that the controversy now stands confined to an amount of Rs.60,567/- [Rs.27,588/- towards principal amount and Rs.32,979/- towards interest] which the respondents are demanding on account of alleged enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Whereas, the petitioner contends that since the compensation amount has been reduced by the High Court in Regular First Appeals and that reduction is not reflected in the aforementioned demanded amount, learned counsel for the HUDA submits that the aforementioned additional demand is based upon the reduced compensation determined by the High Court. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and as agreed to between them, this petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall intimate at least one week in advance to the Chief Accounts Officer, HUDA at Panchkula to arrange a meeting in which the Accounts Officer/In-charge of the office of Estate Officer, HUDA, Gurgaon may also participate. The details/statement of account pertaining to the aforementioned enhanced amount shall be furnished to the petitioner and in case he is satisfied that the demand for the additional amount is based upon the reduced rate of compensation, he may deposit the same within a period of one month from the date of the meeting. However, in case, on re- calculation, it is found that the petitioner has made any excess payment, the same shall also be refunded to him within a period of one month. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from today Disposed of. Dasti. January 27, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE