IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11175 of 2011 Braj Mohan Singh, S/o Late Ram Dutt Singh, R/O Village Navdiha, P.S. Sonepur (Pahleja Ghat), District Saran (Chapra). ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, through Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Deputy General of Police, Saharsa Range, Sahara. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Saharsa. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Head Quarter, Saharsa. 5. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 6. The Director Provident Fund, Patna. 7. The District Provident Fund Officer, Saharsa. 8. The District Treasury Officer, Saharsa. ... ... Respondents. ----------- 2. 14.7.2011. Heard Shri Girdhar Gopal Tiwary, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Shashi Shekhar, learned A.C. to S.C.9, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 4 and 6 to 8/State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.5/Accountant General. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 30.9.2009 from the post of Sub Inspector of Police, District Police Headquarter, Saharsa, has made a prayer for directing the respondents to pay all his retiral dues. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after retirement only amount under the head of Group Insurance was paid. Except the amount of 2 Group Insurance, nothing has been paid in respect of his retiral dues. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to statement made in paragraph-8 of the writ petition whereby it has been empathetically stated that no departmental proceeding was pending against the petitioner. In view of the statement made in paragraph-8 of the writ petition as well as the fact that petitioner retired on 30.9.2009, there is no reason for denying payment of retiral dues to the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition stands allowed with a direction to the respondents, particularly respondent no.3 to take all steps so that sanction in respect of Pension, Gratuity, Commuted value of pension etc. must be sent to the Accountant General within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. After receipt of the sanction from the State authority, court expects that respondent no.5/Accountant General will issue authorization within four weeks from the 3 date of receipt of such sanction. So far as payment of amount of Provident Fund is concerned, respondent nos.6 and 7 are directed to take all steps for payment of the amount of G.P.F. to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order with admissible statutory interest. It is made clear that this order will be applicable provided there is no departmental proceeding or any criminal case against the petitioner. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)