SCA/15/1999 1/2 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 15 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI ============================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ============================================================== KANTABEN P SAGAR & 3 - Petitioner(s) Versus N J DAVE & 5 - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance : NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 3. MR SIRAJ GORI AGP for Respondent(s) : 1 - 2. MR YN RAVANI for Respondent(s) : 3 - 6. RULE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent(s) : 7, ================================================================== CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI Date : 06/12/2005 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned AGP Shri Gori rightly points out that considering the nature of prayer made, with passage of SCA/15/1999 2/2 JUDGMENT time the issues have become infructuous. Though the petitioners have been duly served with the notice of engaging another advocate issued by this Court, no one has appeared for the petitioners. Hence, the petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. (Akil Kureshi, J.) smita/