< HIGH CGURT OF CiiHATTI8GAR'i-i AT BELAgPUR W.P4S) N0. 193/2008 PETITIONER Smt. Suman Shukla, W/o. Shn‘ Kamksh Shulda, Aged about 42 years, Pf o. Head Master, Working a$ 'Govt. Girls Higher Secondary School, Sarkanda, ' Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur (CG) Versus RESPONDENTS 1. State Govt. of (CG) Through Secrctary, Educational Department, DKS Bhawan, Distt. Raipur (CG) 2. District Education Officer, Bilaepn", Distt-J Bilaspur (CG) 3. Block Education Officer, Biiha, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) WREIT PE’HTIGN UNDER ARTICLE 225 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INEIA ISB: Hon’ble Mr. $atish K. égihotri, J4 Shn' Amit Kumar Shanna, counsel for the peu'tioner. Shri S.K.Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State. GRAL 0RD'ER (Passed on this 11th &ay of January 2008) 1. Learned counsel appealing for the petitioner as well as for the Siate] respondents joilitly submit that the fact and question of law involved in the present writ pem‘tion ale the same to that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Burg and another {2006 (ll) MEIR-CG 96}, which has been disposed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Dutg and another (Supra), subject to verincation of ‘the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B. Ed./B.T.I Examination Certjiicate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24. 12. 19§8 and 01.03. 1999 and further Whethar he has 'beml paid two adVaIlCC incrsments or not. No orcicr as to costs. Sd/- Satish KQAgnihotri, 1 Judge Suguna w