IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 18TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 27TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 33826 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ HABNA JOSE, W/O. DR. P. ARUN RAPHEL, KUNDUKULANGARA PARAMBAN HOUSE, CHIYYARAM P.O., THRISSUR 680 026. BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, EDAPPALLY P.O., ERNAKULAM. 3. THE CORPORATE MANAGER, CMS CORPORATE MANAGEMENT, CMS HSS, ROUND WEST, THRISSUR 680 001. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.A.J.VARGHESE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 33826 OF 2008 (B) ==================== Dated this the 18th day of November, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that seeking approval of her service as HSST for the period from 30/7/05 to 30/6/06, Ext.P2 proposal has been made by the 3rd respondent to the 1st respondent. It is stated that orders has not been passed by the 1st respondent and therefore, the 3rd respondent has submitted Ext.P3 reminder as well. It is stated that Ext.P3 also did not evoke any response and therefore the petitioner herself has made Exts. P4 and P7 representations to the 2nd and 3rd respondents. Despite these representations, as response is not forthcoming, the writ petition has been filed for appropriate reliefs. 2. As already noticed, Ext.P2 is the proposal made to the 1st respondent and the complaint is that order has not been passed. If Ext.P2 and the representations referred to above have been received by the 1st respondent, it is for the 1st respondent to consider the same. Learned Government Pleader submits that it is presently the 2nd respondent, who is the competent authority. If that be so, it will be open to the 1st respondent to transmit the proposal to the 2nd respondent, for his consideration. WPC 33826/08 :2 : 3. I direct that the 1st respondent shall take decision on Ext.P2, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 4. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp