^ 1 .^' ¥ OF • " PETETION N0. ^641 OF 2004 Saheblal, about 30 years, S/o Kapil Nath, at present working as a Sanvida Shikshak, R/o village Katoud, Tahsii Shlvrinarayan, Distt« Janjgir-Champa Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the CoStector, Janjgir-Champa, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (CG). (Revisionaj Authority) 2. Sub Divlsional Offjcer (Revenue), Janjgjr. DistS. Janjair-Champa (CG). (Appeliate Authority) 3. Hari Shankar Kashyap, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat, Kataud, Tahsit Shlvrinarayan, Dlstt. Janjglr-Champa (CG). 4. Heeraiman Mahilange, agecl about 29 years, S/o ChSieduram, R/o village IVSisda, Tahsil Shivrinarayan, Dlstt. Janjgir- Champa (CG). (Writ petition under Article 227 ofthe Constitutlon of India) Singie Bench: Hon'ble K. Agiiihotri, J. : Shri Vishnu Koshta, counsel for the petltloner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. Srnt. Shastri, oounsel for the respondent No.4 ORAL (Passed on this 8th day of September, Belng aggrieved by the selection of the petitioner QS a contract Teacher (Grade-111) for acacjemr; session 2003-04. the respondent No.4 preferrecl an appeal chailengjng the and validifry of the said selectjon of the petitioner. Since the oniy for one acadernic. session 2003-04. accordjng to learnecl counseS for the petitioner, sumves In thls and the has infryctuous. 2) Accordingly, the writ petition is dlsmissed as having become jnfructuous. 3) Consequentiy, pending appEications, if any, stand of. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge