IN THE HIGH COURT 0F SIKKIM oRDEFa SHEET Review Petition ........... No. 8 of 2004 (Arising out of Disposed RSR No.1/04) •RA8I[m Versus DIKIIjA BHtJI`IA (SUBBA . Petilloner / Appellant F}espondent Order with Signature Office Note as to action (if any) takerun ordeF 12-2004 rsr/ 9-3-2005 Heard Mr. a. Sharma. learned counsel for the petitioner. Admit the pe`t`itlon. Call for the records. I.et usua&1 notlcebe issued upon the respondent which 1g made retul.nable on 9-3-2005 for which.the petitioner requires to 1=ake steps for service o.f notice soon the respondent within three days . List it on 9-3-2005 for further orde N, (N. Sun Chief CiJ-r ::::(:::8?) The matter is ripe for hearing. Heard ltr. 8. S.harma, learned counsel for th pe€itioner and }tr. A. Moulik, learned couns for the respondent. As prayed for by t.lie learned couns for t.he parties, the matter be listed on- L`d 11-4-20.05 for hearing. (N.S amani Singh) Chief duE,tlce (Actin '`------`i--,-:.:'-:-:`::ii itfuuL#in##frLdo::I I Lq-,OtHg=J,. fu=#bk,_%# S, i ty.iissti& ,i ial Date Order with Signature Office"sto ' ' of of action(ifa-ny) ler Order takenon Order •12 1-4-200-5-2005rsr/ \' 1 As prayed for by M. 8. Shama,- 1eamed counsel for the petitioner; the matter be listed for hearing on 24-5-2005. \ r\. • ` QT..Sirrj mani.Singh).-~ Chief Justice(ActinQ[\ .__ --i- -- - i`,i i= ++I •' =J¥:i As prayed for by m=. N.a. Sherpa, ``+ r r` .' learned counsel `o-n behalf of }tr. `A. Moulik, learned senior courisel, this case be listed on 24-6-2005. The,prayer for adjournment is _ -\---= - -i----- I--1-.-- --_i -.-----_ - - • not obi.ected by ltr. 8. Sharlna. learned counse •,, appearing for the petitioner. ^ \ - .N-I, . (N. Surj ,ani Singh) Chief rug ice (Actina)•\``+ - • L |r____ I <1`+ dr Serial No. of Order Order with Signature Office Note as to action (if any) taken on Order 5.2 6.2 ' -6-ZOO -a-200 It is submlttea at the bar by the learned senior counsels for the parties that the parties may make an attempt to settle th dispute and their differences amicably outsi of the Court for which they need some time which according to me t.he request. 1s reagona Accordingly, this case be listed on 1-8-2005 for necessary order. \`, (N.sNur#+ffi Chief ani¥gh) I-CalAit±nql Mss Rita Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought for some tine so as to enable the parties to have amicable settlemerfu Leaned counsel has also contended that concerned Panchayat ```. had called the parties for amicable settlement. Heard M. A. Moulik, learned serior :c;unsel assisted`b.v M. N.G. Slielpa, leaned counsel `froriifettr`espondent. Be that as it may,. the matter be <listed on 23-9-2005 for necessary order. A A I,E N 0V. Surj Chief Justi e(Acting) 1e® :r. . , SerialNo.of Date`of Order with Signature .`~`offie`eN|a..`to .act-ion`(if'.'y) Order Order takenonorder , 7.2I -9-20057-9-2005 Upon liearing tlie learned counsel for the 0. \- I 8.I1 partiesa.tsomQ}engtli,inpresence;ftheirrespective clients,. the parties Prayed for some tine so as to •-Ienablethemto settle the matter amicably outside the Court. hiVIievy.of it, the matter be listed. on 27-9-2005 for necessary orders. \\ N` ' . ` . dr.'suijam isingh) Chief'Justie (Actiri.g)Asprayedforbytheleanedcounsel for tlie parties, the matter be listed on 29-9-2005 for\\ necessary orders. ~` c Or.Surja ani singh) Chief Just e(Acting) / / SerialNo.6f u£:te Order with Signature Office Note as toaction(ifany) Order Order taken on Order 9,10. II11.I 9.9.05gr30.9.0.11.20 Place this matter before any other a Bench withouc me `(J\lstice N.S. Singh) tcmorrcmr after rising of the` Division Ben (N.:,.ft¥, Chief Justice (Actg. ) As prayed for by Mr. B.C. Sharma, learLped counsel for the review applicant, th&£ case is adjourned to 8.11.2005 as according to him there is a chance of an. amicable settlement between the parties.`a.-+,i. (Binod. Kuinar Roy) Chj:.ef-' Jils..tice5HeardMr.a.Sh.ar.rna,learnedsenior counsel assisted by Miss Rit.a Sharma, aearn ccmnsel f6r the review applicant and Mr. A Moulik. Iearnec] senior counsel assisted by Mr. N. G. Sherpa. learned coun-sel for the respondent . As prayed for by the learned ccunsel for the parties. this matter be listed tomorrow so that they map avail of some tim to work out amicable sectlement,if possibl(A..Subba) - Serial Date Order with Signature OfficeNoifiasto- No. of of action (if`any). Order Order taken on Order 12.~II73.I .11.200---.-5.II.2005 Heard Mr. a. Sharma, learned senior - I -o`Ipi;Er-aT5=i-sEa-d -bHi-s=||=t-a Sha €ma. learn_e counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. Moulik learned semi.Qr ccmns?1 assisted by Mr. N. G. Sherpa; 'learned counsel for the respondent. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing fc)r the parties that.both parties have come to an amicable settlement and about 15 days time will be required for finalising the ner=essary dc)ciiments. As prayed for by the parties. list this matter fc)r orders on 25.11.2005.(e e\.P|, Sufoba-) EirHeardMr.a.Sharma,learnedsenior counsel assisted by Miss Rita Sharma, learned counsel for the review petitioner an-d Mr. N. G. Sherpa,learned co.uns6I assist`ed by Miss Kesang Diki Bhutia, learned counsel for the respondent. Parties submit that the deed of compromise has • -beerrfinalized and parties-are~onlyTequiredio put their signa.tures, fo.r which q few d`ays time is prayed for. As prayed for by the parties, list this matter for orders on 29.11.2005. ( A. P.'Subba ) J- I 25.11.2005 u Serial Date Order with Signature Office Note as to No. of of action (if any) Order Order taken on Order 74. 29.I I.2005 c,tL CJLfl- Heard Mr. a. Sharma, learned senior counsel assisted by Miss Rita Sharma, learned counsel for the review petitioner and Mr. A. Moulik, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. N. G. Sherpa, learned counsel and Miss Kesang Diki Bhutia, learned counsel for the respondent. lt is submitted by the parties that the matter has been amicably settled, and in support thereof, they have filed a joint petition of compromise. The compromise petition has been duly signed by them and the brothers and sisters of the petitioner. Accordingly, as prayed for by the parties, the deed of compromise is taken on record and marked as `x' for identification. C|, D] C€1 F>9 L / Since the matter is settled, this Revision Petition •::"`.:.`i!;,:..,::--.I...-:.:::..`:.I-..c,`-f`,.;-(` stands disposed of as withdrawn. The parties shall be at liberty to take follow-up action in terms of the deed of compromise. / As prayed for, the judgment passed in Regular Second Appeal No.1 of 2004 dated 22.11.2004 by the concerned Bench of this Court, and the decree drawn up in terms of the judgment, shall stand merged with this order. Pronounced. ( in Subba ) J- 29. ' '.2005