IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7282 of 2011 SAKET KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 22.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 287,304 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was working as supervisor in Gaya Loco Washing pit. The petitioner on the alleged date of occurrence went at the working place alongwith labourers for washing and cleaning the compartments. The machine used to run by the diesel generator set but this petitioner was using the electric line for running the machine for which the labourers denied to do so. On persuasion of this petitioner, one of the labourers went for washing the compartment then he was electrocuted. He was admitted in hospital but subsequently he died. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that it is at best a case of negligence as the petitioner 2 has no intention to kill the victim. Prima- facie considering the accusations, this court is of the view that the accusation under Section 304 is doubtful. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with G.R.P. Gaya Case No. 176 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Railway Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)