0P“ m THE HIGH COURT OF G‘IHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR wm Pewion Nu}? 73mm PETITIONER Bhushan Patel, 5/0 $m‘ Hulasram @ Gledi Patel, aged about 19 yams, ( .n R/o Kota Dabxi, PS. Chanpa, Districb Ianjgir Cha§¥pa (CG). - Vexsus— 1. State of Chhattisgaxh, mugh semmy, Depmmmt of a Home, Manhalaya, D. K. S. Bhawan, Sham Ctmwk, Raipur (CG). 2. Collector/District Mag'slrate, Ianjgirwa, District— MgirMm (CG) 3. Supaintmdent 0f Police, Ianjgir (haw, Dismct- Ianjgir Cwpa (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226$ 227 OF, THE CONSTIWTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF ‘ MANDAMUS PROHIBITION CERTIORARI ETCDR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. RESPONDBN‘IS ). {K: . HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 273 of 2003 PETITIONER : Bhushan Patel. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others’ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri H.S.Ahluwalia, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 28t day of September, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that with the passage of time, this petition has become v infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side does not controvert the above submission. 3. In View of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotn‘ Judge