BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eleventh day of January Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM CRL OP(MD) No.346 of 2011 GANESAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.3 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADAYAM POLICE STATION, IN CR.NO. 171/2010, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.V.KATHIRVELU ASSOCIATES Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.RAJENDRAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 506(ii) and 420 IPC in Crime No. 171 of 2010, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The Court heard the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent State. 3. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the case primarily is of the first accused having collected a sum of Rs. 7,15,000/- from the defacto complainant promising him employment in a Cooperative Society. The learned Senior Counsel would submit that the first accused was the Secretary in the Cooperative Society. In the present case, the allegation is that when the said sum was handed over to the first accused , the accused 2 to 4 were present. The learned Senior Counsel would submit that an earlier complaint had been forwarded by the defacto complainant to the respondent on 27.08.2010 and such complaint spoke only about the first and second accused. Urging the above, he would seek the relief of anticipatory bail. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission of the learned Government Advocate, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate , Ambasamudram, and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for the purpose of interrogation. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 11/01/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AMBASAMUDRAM 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 3 SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.V.KATHIRVELU ASSOCIATES Advocate SR.No.1277 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.346 of 2011 Date :11/01/2011 PAM 12.01.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/