( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2587 OF 2010 Sou. Kalinda w/o Kisanrao Khole PETITIONER VERSUS Ram s/o Dattatraya More and another. RESPONDENTS .... Mr. M.B. Sandanshiv, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. C.V. Dharurkar, advocate for the respondent No. 1. Mr. D.R. Korade, AGP for the respondent No.2. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 29th June, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By consent, the petition is being disposed of in following terms : (i) The impugned order is set aside. (ii) The four (4) plots i.e. plot Nos. 11 to 15 shall be comprehensively measured by the T.I.L.R., appointed by the trial Court by commencing the measurement from northern side i.e. at the end of plot No. 11. The boundaries of each plot shall be demarcated by the Court Commissioner. (iii) The parties shall equally bear the expenditure ( 2 ) required for comprehensive measurement. If the petitioner will not pay the half share for the comprehensive measurement, the respondent No. 1 shall pay the same initially and the same will be recoverable from the petitioner. The petition is accordingly disposed of. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/wp2587-10