CWP(T) No.3896 of 2008 21.04.2011 Present:- Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Dy.A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. D. K. Khanna, Advocate, for respondent No. 3 Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate, for respondent No. 4 Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate, for respondents No. 5 & 8 Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No. 9 Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent No. 9 filed by Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, Advocate is taken on record. 2. Petitioners and private respondents were present in the Court yesterday. Learned counsel for the private parties made serious efforts in endeavouring to resolve the dispute amicably. The efforts made are highly appreciable. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance of the petitioners as made out in the petition can be left to the Government to be decided in accordance with law. They have no intention of disturbing the private respondents who have been serving for more than over a decade and, as such, do not challenge their appointment. They only want their claim for appointment to the post in question to be considered. 4. Respondent-State shall consider the petitioners’ contentions and claims and take a decision thereupon, in accordance with law. Before taking such decision, the State shall, if necessary, afford opportunity of hearing/representation to the concerned party. Respondent No.1, in consultation with respondent No.3 shall do the needful within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid directions, present petition stands disposed of. Copy dasti. April 21, 2011 ( Sanjay Karol ) (rana) Judge.