^^-iV-''' ..-•' £^^L^ '^wy C^f 3-~Q (2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO^673 /2006 PETITIONER ~'^tvs"9 RESPONDENTS ^ •^ \pl-<^ <•„ Gunbhooshan Sahu. S/oShriShripatiSahu Age about 39 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Ghinara, Block - Kartala, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh / Through: Secretary, Tribal Welfare and Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 AssistantCommissioner,. Tnbal Welfare Department, I.T.I. Korba (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer^ I.T.I. Korba (C.G.) 4. BlockEducationOfficer , Block Office Kartala, Teh. - Kartala, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) 5. Joint Director (Funds and Accounts)^ Nutan Chowk, Sarkanda, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Petitioner most humbly submit as under:- ^\ ^^^ o^Q2.€^or' I . @ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTES6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.raNo. 5635 of 2006 Petitioner : Ate^anerth Yadav Versus Respondents : 5tate 6ovt. of ChhatMsgorh A awther W. P.(S)No. 5636 of 2006 Petitioner : Styadhcr Praaid Sohu Versus Respondents : State 6ovt. of CWiatKagarh A ano'ther W.P.(SlNo.S637ofZ006 Petitioner : Raniaahanltar fiupta Versus Rcspondents : Stateeovt.ofChhattiagflrhAono'ther W.P.fS)No.56Mof2006 Petitionw : Tceknm Lal Sinha Versus Reapondents : Stetefiovt.ofChhattiagnrhAano'lhcr W.P.ffflMo. 5639 of 2006 Petitioner : Smt.SunitaPnl Versus Responden'fts : State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh A ano'lhw W.P.(a»<io.5640ofZ006 Petitknier Mohboob Khan Qunrishi Verais Respondents : Statiefiovt.ofCWNrttiagarhAano'ther W.P.rftNo.S641of2006 PtetMioner : Smt. JageaNNfi Bhagel Wersus Regpondents : StntBSwt.ofChhattisgarhAanolher W. P.faNo. 5642 of 2006 Petitioner : Tulendro Kunwr Tniuri Veraus Reapondents : Stoite 6ovt. of Chhattiagnrh A ano-ther W. P. (S) No. S643 of 2006 Ptetitioner : Rainaytw yadma Wenus Respondents : Stut»eovt.ofChhatti<garhAano1her Pktrtioner Reapondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Rcspondents Petitioner Respondents Ptrtitioner Reapondwits Petitioner Respondents Petitioner Reapondents Petitioner Respondents W.P.fSlNo.B644<>f2006 ; Anujtem Snhu Veraus : StuteSovt.ofChhattisgnrhAono'thcr W. P.fSiNo. 5646 of 2006 Rdjuxira Kumar 6uptn Versus : Statefiovt.ofChhattisgarhAanolhcr W. P.faNo. 5647 of 2006 : SharadTiNiari Versus : State Sovt. of Chhattisgnrh A ono-ther W. P.fSiNo. 5648 of 2006 : MnhendraPruandShukki Versus : Stateftwt.ofChhtrttisgarhAciwthw W. P.fS^No. 5673 of 2006 fiunbheoahan Sahu Versus State 6wt. of Chhattjsgnrh & anothw W. P.faNo. 5674 of 2006 : Smt. Jayu Tiwari Veraus : Statc 6ovt. of Chha*ti39<rh Aanothcr W. P.fSlNo. 5675 of 2006 : Tuka Rnm Chanab'ukar Versus State 6ovt. of Chhattiagarh A arwther W. P.faNo. 5676 of 2006 : ftameah Kuniar Vernw Verais : State 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh &anolher And W.P.faNo.5677ofa)06 Versus Ohunaay Patel Stetc 6wt. uf Chhattiagarh Aawther Singto Bmch: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satiah K. Agnitwtri. Shri Ajay 5hrivustava, Advocate for the Petitionws. Snt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. 6ovt. Adwcote for Ihe reapondents/State. OROER (26tl'0ctober,2006) 1. L<eBned counsel appearing for Ihe petitioners aubrorts •that while uiorking cs Asaistent TeachcraA^pper Owiaion TcaehersAjeclurers, the petitioners hew gone on trainin9 to improve their qualifications on •thcir own eayuoes <»idacquinsd B. EdyB.TJ Examination Certifkate. The present w'ft petitiuns, being WJ».(S) Nos. 5635/2006, 5636/2006, 5637/2006. 5638/2006. 8639/2006. 5640/2006, 564V2006. 5642/2006. 5643/2006, 5644/2006. 5646/2006, 5647/Z006, 5648/2006, 5673/2006,5674/2006. 5675/2006. 5676/2006 and 5677/2006 invalve amilor facts and common (piestion »ftaw. Thus, 1hese petitiona are bein9 dispased of by Ihis common order. 3. According to leamed counsel for Ihe petitioners. Ihe petitiuners ore entitted to •hN»advnnee increments in view of the dedsion of Ihis Court m Ihe caae of yaahtinrit IGumar Gharodwgy Vs. Municipal Corporwtion, Durg and uwther {2006 CCE) MPJR-C6 96}. TTiis Court in Ihe aae of yoahtKnt Kunur Bharodwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and cno-ther 4 (Siyru), came to 1he conclusion Ihat Ihe teoGhcrs. fho hud obtawied B.Ed./B.TJ. Examinution CBrtificute on his WHH expenses, are covered by Ihe drcuhir dertcd 24.1258 isaued by 1he Stute Swemment of Madhyu Pradeah. 4. Lnirned counsel for •the petitwnera furthcr aAmils -that •Ihe facts and question af luw inwlved in 'th* present CBSBS erc squunsly cwered by decision of this Court h Ihe caae of yoahwunt Kunwr Bharadwuy Vs. Murricipal Corponriion, Dur9 and ano'ther (5upra), to which leamed couwel dppcuring for •the respondwrts •fairly conoedes and a9nses nri'th 'riw o»iermcnt made by leamed counsel oppearmg for Ihe petitionws. 5. Accordingly, Ihe writ petrtions are orflmied in terms of Ite order passed in •the cnse of yaahwant Kunwr KwadwKy Vs. <Aunicipal Corponrtion, tSurg ond anolher (Supra). aAjtct tn werifkation of -the fact as to Nhether thc petrtionera haws acquired B. 6d7B.TJ. Examinutwn Cu'tificate on •their oon ,expendM or not. No order as to costs. 6. A copy of •this ordw be placul on record of olher conneeted Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge