BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT ORGANISED BY THE HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE PRESENT : SHRI. S.VENKITA SUBRAMANIA IYER (SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) AND SHRI. K.J.THOMAS STANLEY (RETIRED ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE) TUESDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2008 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1930 SA.No. 219 of 2000(A) --------------------- AS.106/1992 of ADDL.SUB COURT,N. PARAVUR OS.57/1983 of MUNSIFF'S COURT, N. PARAVUR .................... APPELLANT/1ST RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: --------------------------------------------------------------------- SREEMATHY, D/O. KEEZHOTHY THUNDIPADATHU VELAYUDHAN, NANTHIATTU KUNNAM MURI, PARAVOOR PAKUTHY, PARAVOOR TALUK BY ADV. SHRI. P. VISWANATHAN RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT & ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 3/ RESPONDENT NO:2 TO 7/DEFENDANTS 1 & 2: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. KARTHIKEYAN, S/O. VELAYUDAN, KEEZHOTHU THUNDIPADATHU VEETIL, NANTHIATTUKUNNAM MURI PARAVOOR PAKUTHY, PARAVOOR TALUK *2. GOPALAN, S/O. KEEZHOTHU THUNDIPADATHU KRISHNAN NANTHIATTUKUNNAM, -DO- 3. RATHNAMMA, W/O. GOPALAN, KEEZHOTHY THUNDIPADATHU VEETTIL NANTHIATTUKUNNAM MURI, PARAVOOR PAKUTHY PARAVOOR TALUK 4. GEETHA, D/O. GOPALAN, -DO- 5. SATHEESAN, S/O. GOPALAN, -DO- 6. ANI, S/O. GOPALAN, -DO- 7. SUNI, S/O. GOPALAN, -DO- *RESPONDENTS 2 TO 7 ARE DELETED VIDE AWARD DT. 8.4.2008 R1 BY ADV. SRI.B.RAMACHANDRAN SRI.L.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN SRI.K.VIJAYACHANDRA MENON R3 TO 7 BY ADV. SRI. A. GOPI THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR DETERMINATION AT LOK ADALAT ALONG WITH WPC NO. 787 OF 2005 AND THE PARTIES HAVING SETTLED THE MATTER, THE FOLLOWING AWARD IS PASSED IN TERMS OF SETTLEMENT ORDER ON C.M.P.NOS: 606/00 & 1762/00 IN S.A. 219/2000 CLOSED: 8/4/2008 SD/- SHRI. S.VENKITA SUBRAMANIA IYER SENIOR ADVOCATE SD/- SHRI. K.J.THOMAS STANLEY RETIRED ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE jj SHRI. S. VENKITA SUBRAMANIA IYER (SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA) AND SHRI. K.J.THOMAS STANLEY (RETIRED ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE) ------------------------------------------------------------- S.A. NO.219/2000 & W.P(C)NO: 787 OF 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th April, 2008. A W A R D Learned counsel for the appellant in S.A.219/00 as well as petitioner in W.P(C) 787/05 is present. The appellant in the second appeal who is same as the petitioner in the writ petition is also present. The first defendant in the suit who is the first respondent in the second appeal and who is the fourth respondent in the writ petition also is present. Learned counsel for the first defendant/first respondent in the second appeal and the fourth respondent in the writ petition is also present. The subject matter of the dispute in the second appeal and writ petition are settled amicably between the parties and the terms of settlement are embodied in a separate terms of settlement and are appended hereto. The sketch referred to in the terms of settlement which was Ext.C3 in the trial court is also appended S.A.219/00 & W.P(C) 787/05 -2- to the terms of settlement and both are treated as component facts. The settlement arrived at as per the terms of settlement is recorded. The award is to be passed accordingly. The parties agree that the second respondent and legal representatives of second respondent are deleted. Second appeal and writ petition are settled as above. SHRI. S.VENKITA SUBRAMANIA IYER SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA SHRI. K.J.THOMAS STANLEY RETIRED ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE jj