1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Court Receiver’s Report No.109 of 2010 . in Suit No. 3130 of 2002 Harkisondas Motilal Shah .. Plaintiff v/s. Shantilal Jagjivandas Shah & Others ..Defendants Mr.S.V.Doijode i/b. Doijode & Associates for the Plaintiff. Sushila Paekh i/b. M/s. Shukla & Shukla for the Defendants Mr.K.K.Jadhav Advocate for bidder Shri G.G.Ketkar, 1st Asst. to Court Receiver. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 6th July, 2010 P.C. : 1. Mr.Jadhav, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Kampani, who was one of the bidders, upon instructions states that Mr. Kampani is not interested in going ahead with the bid. Mr.Nikhil M. Shah is giving fresh offer of Rs.31,000/-. According to the Office of the Court Receiver, the monthly maintenance and bills raised by the society are required to be borne by the person who is to be appointed as agent of the Court Receiver. According to the Court Receiver’s 2 Office, this term was made known to the bidders before bidding. On hearing this condition, Mr. Nikhil Shah who is the present in the Court states that he is not agreeable for this term and condition and he is prepared to pay only Rs.31,000/- being the bid amount. Since Mr. Nikhil Shah, the bidder is not prepared to pay the monthly maintenance, the bidding on behalf of Mr. Nikhil Shah can’t be accepted. Court Receiver’s Report is closed. 2. Court Receiver to put up proper papers for seeking Orders in the matter. Demand Draft tendered by Mr. Kampani, which is presently in the custody of the Court Receiver be returned to Mr. Kampani forthwith. Same shall be the order so far as demand draft deposited by Mr. N.M.Shah. The Court Receiver need not wait for the written orders in regard to the return of the demand draft. He can do it without production of the order. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]