IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1568 of 2011 Sudarshan Ram Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 2 27.6.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner wants inclusion of his name in the panel which has been prepared for appointment of class IV post. From perusal of annexure-4 it is evident that petitioner had lodged a grievance or complaint with the Chief Minister of Bihar and the matter was ordered to be enquired into. The authority of the district administration in their order have indicated that maximum age for appointment for S.C and S.T. candidate is 40 years of age, whereas the petitioner on the date of consideration was 43 years 7 months and 19 days old. Communication of this order has not satisfied the petitioner because he has mentioned names of certain persons who are more than 40 years of age and have been appointed. To that extent he pleads discrimination. How much of the assertion in the writ is valid can be best verified by the district administration. If the allegation made, according to petitioner, is correct then the case of the petitioner requires consideration. But if the allegation is make belief then the petitioner would be told of the actual status on this count of discrimination. This writ application is disposed of with a direction upon the Deputy Collector, Nazarat at Buxar to do the needful within the time frame of three months from the date of - 2 - production or communication of the copy of this order. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)