IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2432 OF 2007 Mrs.Merele Gracias & Ors....... ......... Petitioners V/s Shriram Ramaddin Yadav & Ors... ......... Respondents. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Office Notes, Office ) Court's or Judge's Orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances ) Court's orders or directions and ) Registrar's orders. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- Mr.R.D.Suryawanshi, Adv. for the petitioners. CORAM: A.P. DESHPANDE, J. 4.6.2007 PC: By the present petition the petitioners question the correctness of an order passed by the trial Court dated 22.3.2007whichin turn allows the application moved by one M/s.Pareira Enterprises (third party) filed under Order 1 Rule X of Code of Civil Procedure seeking its impledment in the suit. As the trial Court has found that the 1 presence of the applicant before the trial Court was necessary for complete and effective adjudication of all the issues it has allowed the application and permitted the impledment. As in the facts and circumstances of the case the trial Court has found the presence of respondent (applicant before the trial Court) necessary, it has allowed the application. Perused the impugned order. Same does not suffer from any patent illegality warranting interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. Hence writ petition is summarily dismissed. 4.6.07. 2