C.W.P. No. 9445 of 2006 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 9445 of 2006 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.12.2009 Gurnam Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus Punjab State Electricity Board and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present: - Mr. H.K. Brinda, Advocate, for Mr. Dharam Pal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** VINOD K. SHARMA, J (ORAL) CM No. 15115 of 2009 Allowed as prayed for. CWP No. 9445 of 2006 The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court, to challenge the order passed by the respondents ordering recovery on account of the fact that benefits were granted wrongly. The order has been challenged by the petitioners, on the plea, that no fraud or mis-representation is attributed to the petitioners in getting the benefits, wrongly granted to the petitioners, therefore, no recovery can be effected in view of decision of the Hon'ble Full Bench in Budh Ram and others Vs. State of Haryana and others, 2009(2) Law Herald 1617. C.W.P. No. 9445 of 2006 (O&M) -2- Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has not been able to controvert this stand of the petitioners. The matter being squarely covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court in Budh Ram and others Vs. State of Haryana and others(supra), the writ petition is allowed, and the impugned orders of recovery are set aside. No costs. (Vinod K. Sharma) Judge December 02, 2009 R.S.