IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2009 / 3RD ASHADHA 1931 WP(C).No. 16732 of 2009(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.C.RADHAKRISHNAN, HEALTH SUPERVISOR, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, MELADY, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.P.RADHAKRISHNAN (1) SRI.MADHU RADHAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOYILANDY POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE. 2. PRAMEELA C.V., JUNIOR PUBLIC HEALTH NURSE, MAYLADY P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.A. SALIM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 16732 of 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 24th June, 2009 J U D G M E N T Raman, J. The grievance of the petitioner is that on the historical background of the dispute between the petitioner and the second respondent and being influenced on political considerations, false case is being registered against the petitioner and further Ext.P7 complaint filed by the petitioner before the State Commission for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes is compelled to be withdrawn. This is the sum and substance of the grievance raised in the writ petition alleging police harassment. 2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that on a complaint being forwarded to the Kerala State Women's Commission, a case is registered against W.P.(C) No.16722/2009 2 the petitioner. Therefore, it is open to the petitioner to avail remedies, if the case now registered is alleged to be false. 3. As regards Ext.P7 is concerned, being an application made before the State Commission, merits or otherwise of the complaint made in Ext.P7 will be considered and disposed of by that Commission. As at present, there is no evidence of any compulsion to withdraw the complaint made by the petitioner. Even otherwise, if there is any such case for the petitioner, he can even represent the matter before the same Commission, where the matter is pending. The writ petition is closed with the above observations. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN , JUDGE. nj.