IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39508 of 2010 1. SHAHNAZ BEGUM. 2. Md. Sayeed. ……..Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Torture for demand of dowry is the allegation but petitioner’s son is Mohamadan, while complainant is Hindu may be in relation to any extent, but never legal marriage in absence of which no offence under Section 498A of the I.P.C. may constitute even for refusal for anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners are allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 15 of 2010 above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. Bhardwaj (Mandhata Singh, J.)