IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 1932 of 1997 Between: N.Jagadeeswara Rao, S/o. Latchanna "Sri Kanaka Mahalakshmi Metal Industries", R/o. Huda Colony, No.124, Balaga ,Srikakulam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1The Dist.Collector, Srikakulam Dist. 2The General Manger, Dist.Industrial Centre, Srikakulam. 3The Dist.Medical and Health Officer, Srikakulam Dist. 4The Dist.Panchayat Officer, Srikakulam Dist. 5The Gram Panchayat,Ragolu, rep.by it's Special Officer, Srikakulam Mandal and Dist. 6The Environment Engineer, A.P.Pollution Control Board, Regional Officer, Siddarthanagar Tank Bund Road, Vizianagaram-3. 7A.Raja Sekhar, R/o.Ragolu, Srikakulam -532 484. 8N.Gopal Krishna , C/o. M/s. Gopalakrishna Tiles, R/.o. Ragolu., Srikakulam Dist -532 484 9The Mandal Revenue Officer, Srikakulam Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ ,order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 6 and 9 not to take any further steps to cancel the licence of the petitioner granted to run his industry in the name and style of "Sri Kanaka Mahalaxmi Metal Industry at Ragolu of Srikakulam Dist., Declaring that the proceedings of the 5th respondent dt.13.4.1995 directing the petitioner to close his industry and the notice dt.29-10-1996 issued by the 9th respondent directing the petitioner to attend for the enquiry U/sec 133 of Cr.PC are all arbitrary ,improper ,contrary to law,violative of the fundamental rights and principles of natural justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.RAMALINGA SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FAMI.WELFARE The Court made the following : ORDER: Ms. Sita Devi, Advocate, representing Sri D.Ramalinga swamy, counsel for the petitioner, states that the writ petition became infructuous. Accordingly the writ petition is hereby dismissed as infructuous. No costs. --------------------- 21-12-2004 Stp To 1The Dist.Collector, Srikakulam Dist. 2The General Maanger, Dist.Industrial Centre, Srikakulam. 3The Dist.Medical and Health Officer, Srikakulam Dist. 4The Dist.Panchayat Officer, Srikakulam Dist. 5 The Special Officer, Gram Panchayat,Ragolu, Srikakulam Mandal and Dist. 6The Envioronment Engineer, A.P.Pollution Control Board, Regional Officer, Siddarthanagar Tank Bund Road, Vizianagaram-3. 7.The Mandal Revenue Officer, Srikakulam Dist. 8. 2CCs to G.P. for Medical Head and Family Welfare,A.P.High Court Buildings,Hyd.(OUT). 9.2CD copies