IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2547 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 2547 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 2547 OF 2005 Dhirajlal Maneklal Mehta and others. ... Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra & others. ... Respondents. Ashutosh Gavnekar i/b. B.R.Vishwakarma for the petitioners. Milind More, AGP for respondent No.1. A.K.Savla for respondent No.2. CORAL: CORAL: CORAL: F.I.REBELLO AND ANOOP MOHTA. JJ. F.I.REBELLO AND ANOOP MOHTA. JJ. F.I.REBELLO AND ANOOP MOHTA. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : : : 17th November 2006. 17th November 2006. 17th November 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : ---- ---- ---- . Neither the Corporation nor the State has been served. 2. The only grievance of the petitioners is that the representation made by the petitioner on 18th June 2003 is still undecided. If it is so, it is open for the petitioners to make further representation to the Commissioner inviting his attention to the representation dated 18th June 2003. In that event, if the representation dated 18th June 2003 is not decided, the Commissioner or any competent authority shall decide the same within two weeks from the date of receipt of further representation of the petitioners. 3. With the above observations, petition stands disposed of. (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP MOHTA, J.) MOHTA, J.) MOHTA, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, (F.I.REBELLO, J.) J.) J.)