IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 1ST FEBRUARY 2010 / 12TH MAGHA 1931 Crl.MC.No. 2552 of 2008(D) -------------------------------------- (CMP.NO.449/2008 OF THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, KOLLAM, CRIME NO.42/2008 OF KOLLAM WEST POLICE STATION) PETITIONER/ ACCUSED: ----------------------------------- SUBERKUTTY, RAHIYA MANZIL, VENGAYIL MURI, MINAGAPPALLY VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY ADVS. MR.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF, MR.R. KRISHNAKUMAR. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLAM WEST POLICE STATION, KOLLAM (CRIME NO.42/2008) REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 2. RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI, LEKSHMI NILAYAM, THEVALLY PO., KOLLAM. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. NAZAR.S.U, R2 BY ADVS. MR. LEGY ABRAHAM, MR.C.N. SIVANKUTTY. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/02/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. P.BHAVADASAN, J. --------------------------- Crl.M.C No.2552 OF 2008 -------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of February 2010 ----------------------------------------------------- ORDER This is a petition filed under under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking to have Annexure A1 complaint quashed. 2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.42/2008 of Kollam West Police Station for having committed offences punishable under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code. 3. In the light of the order that is proposed, it is unnecessary to go into the details of the case. Private complaint was sent for investigation under Section 456(3) Cr.P.C. Police registered a case after investigation. A refer report was filed. It is submitted that the defacto-complainant had filed a protest complaint. Petitioner says that this petition would be closed with liberty to challenge protest complaint. Reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge the protest complaint, this petition is closed. Sd/- P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE //TRUE COPY// vdv P.A TO JUDGE