IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6517 of 2011 SANTOSH SINGH . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 3. 20.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional public prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and it appears that he has been made accused in this case on the basis of this fact that one looted mobile set has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner but stand on behalf of the petitioner is that IMEI number of recovered mobile is quite different to the IMEI number of looted mobile. Considering the above stated facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati in connection with Sherghati(Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 171/2010. Nitesh ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)