(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 103 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 103 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 103 OF 2004 Vidyamandir Vairag ...Petitioner Versus Shri. Laxmanraoji Dhobale & Ors ...Respondents ..... Mr. S.D. Thokade, counsel for Petitioner Mr. A.H. Palekar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 15TH APRIL, 2005 DATED: 15TH APRIL, 2005 DATED: 15TH APRIL, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. On seeing the original file submitted by the learned A.G.P. it is clear that the parties had appeared and the Government has taken the decision on or about 24.2.2004. Hence, there is no case made out to take cognizance of contempt as noted in the earlier order dated 22.2.2005. The petitioner may have any other appropriate remedy. 2. The contempt petition is therefore rejected. *****