IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.139 of 2011 VISHWANATH PRASAD YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 19.04.2011 Heard the learned counsels for the parties. The grievance of the petitioner is that although the petitioner is the rightful owner of the property in question, however his neighbour at all point creates problem to the extent of assaulting the petitioner for which the petitioner has lodged the first information report vide Patna Sadar Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 25 of 2011 for the alleged offence under sections 307 and other allied sections of the Penal Code. It is submitted that the investigation of the aforesaid police case is still pending. It is further submitted that the petitioner has also filed a representation before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna as contained in Annexure-3/1. Considering the submissions of the parties, it is expedient in the interest of justice that the investigation of the aforesaid police case be completed at the earliest. It is accordingly directed that let the investigation of the aforesaid police case be completed expeditiously without unnecessary delay and upon completion of the investigation police report be submitted forthwith. However, in case the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the investigation of the case, it will be open for him to bring it to the notice of the respondent no.5, who shall look into the matter, if need be, in accordance with law. The writ application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)