IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17409 of 2011 SHASHI SHEKHAR DIXIT SON OF RAMASHRAY DIXIT, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAM DHANAV, P.S. BANIYAPUR, DISTRICT-SARAN. ….PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …….OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 02. 14.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused for offences punishable under Sections 363, 369, 368, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the husband of the complainant, namely, Pankaj Kumar Dixit executed and got registered sale deed with respect to his land in favour of the petitioner on payment of the consideration money mentioned in the deed. He further submits that in the year 2007 itself the complainant claiming to be the wife of Pankaj Kumar Dixit filed Title Suit No. 84 of 2007 for declaration of the aforesaid sale deed executed by Pankaj Kumar Dixit as illegal and fraudulent on the ground that the said vendor has mentally retarded and the petitioner got the sale deed executed by force and hence no title passed to the petitioner. He further argued that after about three years of the filing of the said suit the complainant had filed the instant complaint petition on 05.03.2010 for the said offences. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said Pankaj Kumar Dixit is a Government servant and there is no question of his being 2 mentally retarded rather the entire allegation against the petitioner is absolutely false and frivolous and has been leveled only to take that land which has already been legally transferred to the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender of the petitioner, namely, Shashi Shekhar Dixit within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order in the court below, he shall be admitted to bail on executing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000.00 (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran in connection with Baniyapur P.S. Case No. 34 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Devendra/ ( S.N. Hussain, J.)