IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15098 of 2010 ALAM SARBAR, S/o Gulam Sarbar. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 06.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution case is that the petitioner killed his ex-wife since there was a case under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code pending against him instituted in the year 1996. The counsel for the petitioner submits that in fact the deceased had instituted a case against the in-laws for an offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code in 1996 that had ended in acquittal and therefore there was no reason that the petitioner would shoot down his ex-wife with whom he had no connection now. The further submission is that it could be a good reason for falsely implicating the petitioner. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the 2 like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Morkhahi P.S. Case No. 44 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)