IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2389 of 2011 MANTOSH KUMAR @ BABAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 19.04.2011 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302/34, 120B of the I.P.C. and Sections 25(1-b)(a) 27 of the Arms Act. The accusation in the F.I.R. is against the petitioner and others to have surrounded the victim and caused fire arm injury. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in 164 Cr.P.C. statement the informant has not named this petitioner, that can be a good ground for consideration of regular bail. Let learned Court below consider regular bail application of the petitioner keeping in view that in 164 Cr.P.C. statement the informant has not named this petitioner. With the observations made above, the application stands disposed off in connection with Chowk P.S. Case No. 96 of 2010. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)