Dixit 1 WP-7697-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7697 OF 2011 Anand Yahwantrao Manjramkar ... Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents Mr. Sudhir C. Halli for the Petitioner. Mr. S.K. Shinde, Addl. G.P., with Ms. S.S. Bhende, AGP, for Respondent No.1. Mr. R.A. Rodrigues for Respondent No.2. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATE : 23 RD NOVEMBER, 2011. P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Halli, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. The Petitioner was holding the post of Director of Physical Education and Sports / Assistant Professor with Pansare Senior College, Arzapur, Taluka Bilauli, District Nanded. He has already retired on reaching the age of superannuation and he impugns the G.R. dated 5th March, 2011, by which the retirement age of the College and University Teachers has been enhanced to 62 years on certain conditions. Dixit 2 WP-7697-11 3. As per Mr. Shinde, the learned A.G.P. appearing for the Respondent No.1-State of Maharashtra, the impugned G.R. is not applicable to the Petitioner and the Government of Maharashtra is considering as to whether the Lecturers in Physical Education should be given the benefit of enhanced retirement age. Mr. Shinde also states that the Government’s final decision is likely to be declared within a period of four weeks. 4. In case the Government of Maharashtra decides to make the impugned G.R. applicable to the College and University Teachers in Physical Education, our order dated 30th September, 2011 in Writ Petition No.2093 of 2011, along with connected matters, would hold the field and, in any case, we have been assured by Mr. Shinde that a fresh Government Resolution by following the said order is likely to be published by the State Government today. 5. Hence, stand over for five weeks. 6. This Writ Petition be transferred to the Aurangabad Bench of this Court forthwith. [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.] [B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.]