IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 161 OF 2004 SMT. MARIA ANTONETA OPHELIA ....Appellants ALMEIDA AND ANR., Versus SHRI DAMODAR R.PAWASKAR AND 5 ....Respondents ORS., Shri R.M. Shinkre, advocate for the appellants. Coram:- R. M. LODHA, J. Date:- 25th August, 2005 P.C. Heard Mr. Shinkre, learned counsel for the appellants. The Appeal Court concluded that the plaintiffs have not been able to prove that the defendants illegally constructed the suit structure in the month of April, 1979. Though the finding of the Appeal Court is that of reversal, the Appeal Court has considered the oral and the documentary evidence led by the parties and then reached the said finding. The finding is concluded on facts. No substantial question of law arises. The Appeal is dismissed in limine. R. M. LODHA, J.