IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 694 OF 2009 SMT. DEODITA REBELLO AND ANR. ... Petitioner Versus SMT. VICENTINA FERNANDES AND ANR. ... Respondent Mr. D. J. Pangam, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri V. P. Thali, Advocate for respondents. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 13th October, 2010 P.C. Mr. Thali, learned Counsel for respondents submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the application for injunction dated 2nd January, 2009 filed by the respondents since second application for injunction at the instance of a party is not maintainable. Mr. Thali, therefore, submits that consequently, both the orders passed by the Trial Court as well as the Lower Appellate Court be set aside. Mr. Thali further submits that respondents may be granted liberty to avail of appropriate proceeding as may be available in law against the petitioners. 2. Mr. Pangam, learned Counsel for the petitioners, has no objection. 3. Since the second application for injunction filed by the respondents was not maintainable, in the peculiar circumstances of the case, the respondents are permitted to withdraw the application dated 2nd January, 2009 filed by the respondents seeking injunction against the petitioners. Consequently, the order dated 21st August, 2009 passed by Civil Judge, Junior Division, Margao in Regular Civil Suit No.6/2008/E and judgment and order dated 29th September, 2009 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, South Goa, Margao in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal no.44/2009 are quashed and set aside. Liberty to the respondents to avail of appropriate proceedings against the petitioners as may be available in law. 4. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA