1 CHS.457/2009 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 457 OF 2009 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 26 OF 2009 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2926 OF 2009 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 26 OF 2009 Mohammed Arif Akbar Hussain Khatri ..Plaintiff. Vs. M/s A.R. Enterprises & Ors. . ..Defendants. ---- None for the Plaintiff. Mr. R.U. Singh, for the Defendant. --- CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 27 th AUGUST, 2010 P.C. Heard Shri Singh, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Defendants in support of this Chamber Summons. 2] Perused the Chamber Summons and affidavit in support thereof. Plaintiff and his Advocate are absent despite service. There is no affidavit in reply as well. 3] On perusal of the affidavit in support, it is clear that sufficient cause is shown for the delay in filing Vakalatnama. Delay, therefore, 2 CHS.457/2009 deserves to be condoned. The Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Registry to accept the Vakaltnama of the Advocate for the Defendants on record. Since the plaintiff and his Advocate are absent, there shall be no order as to costs. 4] As far as Notice of Motion No.2926 of 2009, since none appears when the matter was called out, place this motion for Dismissal on 2.9.2010. [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.]