1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.215/2007. M/s.Goyal Seeds & Others. VERSUS Ram Prakash Goyal. 29.04.2008. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.Shailesh Prakash Sharma, for petitioners. Mr.Mahesh Sharma, for the respondent. ***** Heard learned counsel for the parties. By the impugned order dated 28.09.2007 passed by the learned trial court, the learned trial court has dismissed the application filed by the defendant-petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. Having gone through the impugned order, I find that the learned trial court has taken note of the plea which has been raised by the defendant-petitioner in the said application which pertains to the earlier compromise between the parties in the criminal case lodged against the petitioner by the plaintiff- respondent. It is not in dispute that the grounds which have been raised in the application under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. do not fall within the ambit of any of the clauses of Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. In that view of the matter, apart from the reasons which have been given by the leanred trial court, I am not inclined to interfere 2 with the impugned order and consequently, this revision petition is dismissed. However, the plea which has been raised by the defendant-petitioner may be raised by the petitioner during the trial in suit, if so advised. Consequently, this petition is dismissed. The interim order stands vacated. The stay application also stands dismissed. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.