..^ c ^•i^^ IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATUERE AT BILASPUR fC.G.l W.P. fS 1 N0. 2-t8^S /2006 ^ ./• PETmONER -'^^ ^•••^.^'o.y .^-•''A'^^"1' •.w iA»" y ..'• : / Smt. Chandramani Vasnik W/o- Dharmendra Vasnik, aged about 39 years, Occupation- Assistant Teacher, R/o- Irrigation Colony, Navagarh, District-Durg (C.G.) ^y VERSUS ^ &-•" RESPONDENTS ^l. ^ 2. 3. 4. State ofChhattisgarh, ThroughtheSecretary, Departmgnt of Education, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). The Collector, District- Durg (C.G.) The Deputy Collector, District- Durg (C.G.) The Prindpal/ ' Primary School Navagarh, Bemetara, District-Durg (C.G.) % .^- y- ,Vyt/b^WRTT PETniONUNDER AICTIGLE 226/227 OFTHE ^' —~—^: ' : • ~—~ —~ CONSTnvnONOFINDIA. S;^gc|^|<|i|wq^!t?^sH^&l%lw|^ *<wdF|Kmm^> iJ^^^'0.-' ,^'n^^,fc,,,,__ .._«^ . ^ •;.K.^.„.„.....t. M. .trf..i^^g^^^j^^ W^IP'qlRp'^fyg) aiI^?iqiTR«li*~' ;raT3II^?T<b*l ^ o s^iftR^ifta ari^r Smt. C] Vasnik, Assisfar] Navagar t. Stateofd Through ! DKS Bhaj The Collel The The Pri Beinetar^ 2. 3. 4. Depijti: S.B Hon'ble ShriiDhIrendra SIlstara, J 14.11.2008 ! Smt. Somsukla Sarkar, cii ShriY.S. Thakur, Dv. AG This petitionl is directed a 7.7.2006 whereby the petitione has been traiisferred from Pr: Primai'y School, Raaitarai, Shri YS Thakur, learned virtue of mterim order passed b traiisfer of AEinexure P/1, so fa been givea effect t& and.therefc petitioner has becoiae redundc tiine. In these circumstances, *;r;<i'i<if»»41'i*)|tfdl'^rl«'<l'<Ki'K;i'r i|53l1^H3IliFST •°'-" landraiaani Vasniki W/o Dharmendra agcd about 39 I years, occupation t Teacher, R/o Irrigation Colony, h, District Durg {CGf hhattisgarh, j thc Sccrctaiy, Dcpartincnt of Education, yan, Raipur (CG) ; ;tor, Distnct Durg (CG) ty Collector, DistrictjDurg (CG) ncipal, Primary .School Navagarh, , District Durg (CG) , . , lunsel for the petitioner. for thc Statc. ; gainst the order of Annexure P/1 dated r, who is serving as'Assistant Teacher, man' School, Nava^arh, Bemetara to Douiidilohara. Dy AG for the State submits that by y tliis Court on 12.9.2006, the order of ^ Q.S it relates to the petitioner, has not |'re, the impugiied tFansfer order of the \iit aiid me^uagless with the lapse of ^hey have no objection tf the petition is yTq^iqlt.^t^^iQ^ysii^iy ^^ /<./^. £/<3 iNPic^^m^ ^— •••••••••••••" •:K-7-%^'" ;anifT;t^i'ip|qfgsj^) 3ii^CTg>tR-fi<i» aangiftCTarRtip; c. '^1?.^ :^ •A, ^ & ^\ ^ aUowed with liberly to the S( matter of transfer of the petitio^ IH View of above subniissl ;;:.,,,.^^;^ ., _ instant.pfitjtion is;aUowed anc| P/l, so far as it relates to thc| State ShaSl be at liberty to p| adnuiustrative exieenov in. the il ;<pljstw<Ili fiinl"^f (s'<l''(RfK;l'<! ^? srf^T sn^sr ;! ate to pass appropriate orders in the ler under the admintstradve exigency. ion of learxied counsel for the State, the hupugiied transfer; order of Aiinexure petitioner, is set aside. However, the iss appropriate orders in the event of aatter of transfer of i2ie pedtioner. Sd/- i Dhirendra Mishra Judge