^ HIGH COURT QF CHHATnSOARH ; BILASPUR Petitioner ^-,1 Versus Respondents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Writ Petition No. 4440 of 2006 Smt. Pummasi, W/o Sri Thakur Siugh, 22 years, R/o Vill. Raintirth, The. Surajpur, Distt. Saiyija. State of Chliattisgarh, Through The Secretaiy, Woinen & CIuld DevelopMent Deptt. D.K.S.Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G.) The CoUector, Anibikapur, Distfc Sai^uja. The Rrogramine/ Project Of&cer, Woinen & Cluld Development Project, Ramaauj Nagar, Distt. Sarguja. The Chief Bxecutive OflBcer, J^apad Panchayat, Raiuanuj Nagar, Distt. Saiyija. Sm.t. Santru Bai, W/o Jagnarayan, R/o Hanumangarh, The. Suiajpur, Diistt Saiguja. (Writ Petition imder Ardcle 226/227 ofthe Constitution ofladia) (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri J.) Shri PrafuU Bharat, Advocate for tfae petitioner. Shri A. S. Kachwaha, Deputy Advocate Oeneral for fhe respondents No. lto3and5. Shri Ravindra Agarwal, Advocate for the respondent No.4. OR D E R ( Passed on this 25dl Day of Maroh, 2009) 1. Leamed counsel appeariug for the petitioner, on iastructions, submits that ia the light offhe order offhis Court in Sxnt. Raai Bal Vs. State of Cbhattisigaih & Ors.1, the petitioner may be permitted to wifhdraw fhis case with Uberly to take recourse to aay other altemative foruin fhat may be available uader provisions oflaw. 2. Leamed counsel appearmg for the respondents have ao objection to the above subiirission made by learaed counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3, In view of fhe -foregoiag, tbis petition is dismissed as wifhdrawn with the above-stated Uberty. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Thalmr | JudgC I{2008 (m)MPJR-CQ 14} ff