IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.55 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.10.2011 Master Ravpreet Singh ....Petitioner Versus Darbara Singh ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Harish Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. H.S. Dhillon, Advocate, for the respondent. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly stated that application seeking maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. is still pending before the learned Magistrate, therefore, learned trial Court be directed to decide the application itself at its own merit without being prejudiced from any observation or finding made by learned Additional Sessions Judge while deciding the question of interim maintenance during the pendency of the maintenance application. He seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. However, learned Court below is directed to decide the maintenance application at its own merit in accordance with law without being prejudiced from any observation or finding recorded by learned Additional Sessions Judge while deciding the question of interim maintenance. Case shall be decided by learned trial Court preferably within three months from the date certified copy of this order is placed before learned trial Court. (Alok Singh) Judge October 04, 2011 R.S.