IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. APP (DB) No.57 of 2011 NIRMAL KUMAR RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 21.04.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the appellant and learned Counsel for the State and learned Counsel for O.P. No. 2. The appellant has come against the judgment dated 25.08.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court IV, Kishanganj in Sessions Trial No. 1007 of 2008 whereby this respondent no. 2 was acquitted and another person was convicted. Learned Counsel for the appellant is aggrieved that the court has not proceeded with the evidence which was available on the record, so the order of acquittal has been passed. It appears from the submissions that the respondent no. 2 was charged under Section 302/120B of the Indian Penal Code. From the judgment, it appears that no evidence of 2 conspiracy has been brought on record. So, the court has passed the reasoned order. The judgment is correct and needs no interference. The appeal has no merit and it is accordingly dismissed. kksinha/- (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) (Gopal Prasad, J.)