IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1933 Con.Case(C).No. 1078 of 2011(S) ------------------------------- (ARISING OUT OF JUDGMENT IN WPC.20449/10 DT.7.1.11.) PETITIONER/4TH RESPONDENT IN WPC: ------------------------------------------- E.GEORGE PAUL, AGED 39, S/O.E.V.PAUL, H.S.A HINDI, UNDER SUSPENSION, RM HSS ALOOR, RESIDING AT EDAPPILLY HOUSE, DEEPTHI BHAVAN, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.PAULSON THOMAS RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER & 3RD RESPONDENT IN WPC: ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1. JULINE JOSEPH.K, AGED ABOUT 39, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MANAGER AND HEADMISTRESS, R.M.HSS ALOOR, PIN-680 120. 2. K.LALITHA, AGED ABOUT 50, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, IRINJALAKUDA NOW WORKING AS PROJECT OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DPI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. JACOB, AGED ABOUT 50, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, IRINJALAKKUDA, 680 121. BY SR.GOVT.PLEADER SHRI M.A.FAYAZ FOR R2 & R3 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN COC.1078/11 PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE-I: COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC.20449/10 DT.7.1.11. ANNEXURE-II: COPY OF NOTICE DT.2.5.11. TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE dsn T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------------- Contempt Case(C)No.1078 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2011 J U D G M E N T Alleging non-compliance of the directions issued in Annexure-I judgment, this Contempt of Court Case has been filed. When the matter was posted on 21.10.2011, the learned Government Pleader submitted that enquiry against the petitioner is already over and report is already submitted by the District Educational Officer. It was also submitted that steps for disbursing the subsistence allowance for certain periods have also been taken. 2. Today the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the subsistence allowance has been disbursed upto July, 2011 and for the remaining months, they are yet to be paid. The learned Government Pleader submitted that the delay had occurred because of the non-submission of non-employment certificate for the said period. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the same has been submitted already. COC.1078/11 -2- The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the disciplinary proceedings have not been finalised so far by the Manager. Even though no specific direction as regards the finalisation of the disciplinary proceedings is discernible from the judgment, the Manager will have to complete the same expeditiously. The subsistence allowance will be paid from time to time. The Contempt of Court Case is closed accordingly. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn