nivlsson IN THE HI6H COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. WRIT APPEAL N0. 2.00 /2010 APPELLANT Petitioner' ^ ^•- •Q'<; ..'**' ...» ^\v..... ^•-<^ ........r-%$;-" .<^*"'^...\-"6 ..g-6" Vs RESPONDENTS ..3,S!issfi"%?*'i'1» .yf^&!^^h Ste^y^ 1 z^ ^ :^"^w. 4^ ffSf^y '^WWWff^'' Smt. Madhu Jaiswal, W/o Shri S.D. Jaiswal, aged 50 years, Occupation- Service, Working as afh.CK F Assistant Grade-II, <-Executive Engineer, Water Resource Division, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 1. State of M.P. (Now C.6.) through the Secretary, Department of Water and Resources, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) '2. Executive Engineer, water Resources Division No.l, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.6.) S.Collector, Korea, District- Korea, Baikuntpur (C.6.) WRIT APPEAL UNbER SECTION 2 OF THE ^" CHHATTISGARH HI6H COURT (APPEAL TO bIVISION BENCH) ACT. 2006 ..—CLo-L '•:i:TS% ""^ i ^^ y' COUBCT OF CHHATnSGARH. BILASPOR DB: HOM'BLB IJM. qVDSWW te HOH'BLB M.K. AORAWAL, JJ 'WStrrASVEKL No.aOO OF 2010 Smt. MadhuJaiswal Va. State oS Madhya Pradesh & others | WRIT ATOBAL U»ED@l SEeTION a(1)0P THB CHHATTISGARH mGH COimTtAPPEAL TQ DIVlSTOM BEatCHI ACT. M06 APPBARANCE: Mr. Siinil Tripathi, counsel for fhe AppdUaat. Mr. M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy -Qovt.Advocrte far (he State/ respondeats on advance copy. ORALQRDER (02.07.20iq Per LM. QUDDirai 1. Heard finally wifh fhe coasent of counscl for botli tfae parties. 2. This writ appeal has been filed against fhe impugned order dated 10.03.2010 passed by fhe leamed singte Jiidge ia W.P (S). No.3306/2005. 3. In fact, fhe writ appellaat fited aa Oaagmal AppUeation before the erstwhile M.P. Stete Admfflisteative Tribunal bcia^ ^ O.A.No.527/2000 agaiast fhe uapugncd onler ofpostmg aiid absorption. of thc petitioaer ia Revenuc Department passed by the CoUector on 24.6.2000 transferring her sendces fiaom water resources departtuent It was aDeged fhat 110 option vras taken finm. the appeUant be&ie her postMig/absorption ia the revenue departmtent whUe transferrfng her semces fiTom. the water resoiuces departiaent Aay how, the positioa which was existing as on 03.07.2000 that is before thc \ y'^"^."''%. '% '% 'f;'^^'", % ^ s- s .y s 6. -z- Reox^auteatton of the State of M.P., was directed to be maintaiaed by order of Administcatiwe Tribunrf dated 04.7.2000. However, after abolitton of ttie State Admiaisteative Tribunal (SAT), the pendiiig OAs were transferred to the High Court aad registered as Writ Petitions. In fhe Instant case, fhe O.A. was converted jato W.P(S).No.3306/ 2005. The leamed siagle Judge vide order dated 10.03.M10 disposmg of the writ petitfon directed that the impi.igaed oirfer dt24.6.2000 passed by thc CoBect&r shan not be gtven e.fifect meaaiss ttiereby that fhe iateriin oxder passed by the Trtbimal was teept coutinuiag aad it was also Bnentfoned tiiat it would be opea for the respoadent autboritfes to tAe decision witli regard to fhe postiag/absorption of the petitioner accordmg to the admitusteatiwe exigency aad ia case the petltioner feels ajgricved, it wffl be opea &r her to approach fhe Court We also feel that after establishmcnt of ibe State of Chliattisgarh aad after lapse of 10 years, iitany developiuents aaust have taken place. The writ appcBant is CQntinuing in tiie departxaent ofwater TCSOUK^S ty way of interun oasder. Thcrefore, a firesh decistoa m the inatter of appellant is reqtmcd to be taten. However, ifit is aeeessaiy to teaasfer fhe semces of fh»writ appellant to the se»^ue department, the refcvant rutes iacludu^; &e Fimdamental Rute 14-B sfaatl be foBowed or if it js iiot tecpiircd at all, appropriate ordecs shaffl be passed by fhe Gfiveiaaaaent AccoiiUitgly, fhe writ appeal stands disposed <rfatAe xaotion stage itsdf. 1 .--— Sd/- I.M.Q^ddusi i N-RAgrawal '•"'ae" i ^-. judge ^xc