IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.22355 of 2003 Between: Sayeedunnisa Begum, S/o. Late Mohd. Maslehuddin R/o. CIB No. 145, Special 'C' Class M.C.H. No. 2-4- 334, Amberpet, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Vice Chairman, A.P. Housing Board Hyderabad rep by its Gruha Kalpa Nampally Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent, A.P. Housing Borad, Hyderabad Gruha Kalpa Nampally Road, Hyd. 3 The Executive Engineer Housing South Division A.P. Housing Board, Hyderabad. Gruhakalpa, Hyderabad. 4 Syed Mohsin Makki S/o.Syed Ahmed Makki R4 is impleaded as per court order dt. 7-7-2005 in WPMP 26925 of 2005 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ order or direction specially one in the nature writ of Mandamus, declaring the in auction of the respondents not make transfer the house C.I.B. 145/C Special MCH No.2-4-334, Amberpet, Hyderabad is illegal, improper, unjust arbitrary it is violation of the under Article 14 to 21 of the constitution of India consequently direct the respondents to transfer the house in the name of petitioner and grant such other relief or reliefs as the Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.T.GHORI Counsel for the Respondents: MR.D.RANGANATHA KUMAR The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.22355 of 2003 ORDER: When this matter came up on 19.09.2008, there was no representation for the petitioner, and the learned Counsel for the petitioner was absent. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Today the matter is appearing under the said caption. In spite of the same, learned Counsel for the petitioner is absent and there is no representation on his behalf. The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for default/non-prosecution. No costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 24.09.2008 vs To 1 The Vice Chairman, A.P. Housing Board Hyderabad rep by its Gruha Kalpa Nampally Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent, A.P. Housing Borad, Hyderabad Gruha Kalpa Nampally Road, Hyd. 3 The Executive Engineer Housing South Division A.P. Housing Board, Hyderabad. Gruhakalpa, Hyderabad. 4 2CCs to 5 2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TSL}