HON’BLE SHRI G.S. SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT PETITION No.16133 OF 2006 Between: G.Chandrasekhar Yadav and another ……Petitioners And The Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise, Govt., of A.P., Hyderabad and two others ……Respondents :: ORDER :: Counsel for the Petitioners : Shri G.Madhusudan Reddy Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2: Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise Counsel for Respondent No.3 : Sri B.Narasimha Sharma Dated: 04-09-2006 Per G.S. SINGHVI, CJ In this petition, the petitioners have prayed for restraining respondent Nos.1 and 2 from granting licence to respondent No.3 to operate bar from a location in violation of the provisions contained in Rule 6 of the Andhra Pradesh Excise (Grant of License of Selling by Bar and Conditions of Licence) Rules, 2005 (for short, ‘the 2005 Rules’). Learned Government Pleader, on the basis of instructions given to her by the departmental authorities, made a statement that no bar will be allowed to operate in violation of the prohibitive parameters laid down in Rule 6 of the 2005 Rules. In view of the statement of the learned Government Pleader, we do not consider it necessary to pass any order on the merits of the petitioners’ grievance and dispose of the writ petition as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the main petition as infructuous, WPMP No.20126 of 2006 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is also disposed of as infructuous. G.S.SINGHVI, CJ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 04-09-2006 ks