<^\o' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. N0. '3SSS /2003 ^ PETITIONER NON-APPLICANT Smt. Prabha Mishra, aged55 years W/o. Sampatti Kumar Mishra R/o.Maitri Nagar, P.S.Purani Basti District Raipur (C.G.) RBSPQNDENT APPLICANT ,^^^' r^":- ^ VERSUS Sampatti Kumar Mishra Aged about 62 years, S/o Pyarelel Mishra, Agriculturist, R/oVillage Basana, P.S. Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 ^H^T'SFT f^;n?F3TI§¥T $^+ilcr> 'yf^a s%< -~v" ^oEf^nqRpi.'Ntwre,;^^ 3nif?r ^^R WHOlt 5b^l<si» __..^ ICD ..^n...<z.^j° •tg^^T' STT^T'^ff^R 30-9-2004 T Shri C.R. ^ahu,counse!for| The petitioner has prefer| 227 of the Constitution of Indial chHi<rl^ilT1 4w<ytf "^ fe^'^R^R '^5rf^m;3T1^T the petitioner. \ ^ed this writ petition under Artlcie being aqgrieved by the order dated 20th September 2003 passed b^ the 3r'd Additionaj Sessions Judge (F.T.C.) Bemetara, wtiereby the appiication c-f the petitioner under Section 24 of the'Hindu 'Marria^ rejected'. and parties. haye ' evidence. Notice of:this petjtion .wo^ i^sued to-respondent When the process server reached the hou^e of respondent.one daughtsr of respondent was present and she v|?as informed about the matter, then je Act for interim maintenance has / . ; ^een directed to produce. their own. respondent's daughter informe^ Iddrinath, and no representation h( I have heard learned counsel Learned counsei for the pe|" this petition oniy to the ©xtent cancer patient is.not abie to ,QO 't| buf the trial Court is insis^ing for t Haying • heard. count reaard to the facts 'and cjrcumsta| is not abie to undertake the jourr^ey to reach.the ;Court to give her that respo.ndent has gone • to as been made. for the petitloner. |titioner argued that he is pressing |i-hat the petitioner herein being a |o the Court dnd give her evJdence, hat. sei for the petitioner and having ^ices of'the case^if^the petitioner ^ XI-HC-22 ^TT^T^T R'tich 3:niF?r ^iftn Y- 7 Barve t ^,^ 'TSr^TRRTO, ^W\Q^W^^ 3TT^T '"^^ VW^WW^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 200 'i^sr' 3H^T ^RTT^R'g^T -z- evidence, in that case, if the petiti^ner triai- Court for recordlng- her eyid^ the.reievant documents of treatm4 •tria! Court is directed to consider) and pass appropriate order in acco| evidence of the. petitloner on cqmmi^ With.the airection aforesaid:J Consequentiy, M.WP. No.;324EI/2003 chl<ll<rt<llt TTT^if ^ fe^ <l?ai^l< ir 3?rf;<w 3?n^?r fiies an: appiication. before'the ^nce on commission supported by Int regarding her i!!ness, then the the appiication of the, petitioner ^dance with 1aw f6r. recording the ision. , . • •: th.e petition ;stands disposed of. aiso ^tands disposed of. Parties are entitled for certified copy of 'this or'der, Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ['T^ ^Rst^