1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3674 OF 2009 IN SUMMMARY SUIT NO.2110 OF 1996 Mrs. Prabha P. Shenai ..... Plaintiff. V/s M Ramchandra Raju ..... Defendant. Mr. Prakash R. Shenai, C.A for the Plaintiff in person. Ms. Poonam Mital, i/b M. Rao for the Defendant. CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY, 2010 P.C: 1. Heard the Constituted Attorney of the Plaintiff in person. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Defendant applies for time to file a reply. However, the Defendant was given sufficient time to file the reply. Hence, no further time can be granted. 2. Perused the affidavit-in-support. The Plaintiff has made out a case for grant of relief prayed in the Notice of Motion. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). So far as prayer clauses (c) to (e) are concerned, liberty is granted to the Plaintiff to file appropriate application in the event of breach of this order 2 by the Defendant. 3. At this stage, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Defendant seeks stay of this order. Request is rejected. Certified copy is expedited. (V.M. KANADE, J.) acd/bdp 3