. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-19080 of 2010 (O & M) Date of Decision: 05.07.2011. Om Parkash ……Petitioner Versus Smt. Rita Rani and another …...Respondents Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Luthra, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Rampal Verma, Advocate for Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for U.T. Chandigarh. L.N. MITTAL, J (ORAL) This petition was received through post. Petitioner-Om Prakash has made this petition under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for filing complaint against both the respondents. However, notice was issued to respondent No.1 only, who has filed her reply. Notice was also issued to standing counsel, U. T. Chandigarh, who has also put in appearance. After moving of the instant petition, petitioner made statements dated 30.09.2010 before Judicial Magistrate, Chandigarh in FIR No.26 dated 20.02.2009 of Police Station, Sector 19, Chandigarh inter alia undertaking to withdraw all legal proceedings instituted by him against respondent No.1. In view of the aforesaid, the instant petition is disposed of as infructuous. (L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE 05.07.2011. A.kaundal