IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 25056 of 2008 Between: Smt.B.Krishna Veni C/o.Smt. B.Rukmini Bai presently residing at 6-1-110/10/B, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh represented by Principal Secretary, Revenue, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad. Chief Commissioner, Land Administration, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 District Collector, Hyderabad. 4 The Special Officer cum Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling & Regulation Act, 1976, Nampally,Hyderabad. 5 The District Educational Officer, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents in not considering Petitioners application dated 16.2.2006 under G.O.Ms.No.455 dated 29.7.2002 is arbitrary, illegal, capricious, high handed, unjust, unsustainable, violate the fundamental rights guaranteed to petitioner under Articles 14, 21 and the guarantee under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India apart from being in violation of the principles of natural justice and fair play and consequently direct the respondents to hand over peaceful physical possession and enjoyment of the land of an extent of about 260 sq. yards together with a residential house constructed therein bearing No. 6-1-119 (Plot No.5), situate at Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad to the petitioner herein forthwith and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.T.S.ANAND Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO.25056 OF 2008 ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition with a view to file a fresh and comprehensive writ petition challenging the order of rejection of the petitioner’s application, for regularization of holding of urban land under, G.O.Ms.No.455 dated 29-07- 2002, dated.22-02-2007. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted as such. No costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 8th JUNE 2009 *TSNR