' G^ IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR WRTT PETTTCON (S) N0. ^)/?72009 ^' i PETn-EONER RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. ..^ ^•^ ^0"'' i^- ^y.. '^•••"" ^ '^' <<z><" 2. 3. Smt. Ravindar Bagga, aged qbput 51 years, wife of Shri Harvindar Pal Singh Bagga, "Head Mistress", ^Govt. Primary School - Sahaspur, Block - Sarangarh, Tahsil- Sarangarh, Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) The State of Chhattisgarh, Through- The Secretary, bepartment of School Education, Mantralaya, bau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, District - Raigarh (C.G.) The Block Education Officer, Block- Sarangarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) WRTT PETmON U/A - 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTCON OF_INMA 3?I^T ^? ?<-iJ<sh ^CT3?^?i^'grisF 'S'S^ '<1|*j|<'1^, •®tTi.(-t*Ko,(«K'11-y*l< ^^.......^:.£.^..^ni_ NIN^I *Nt<!b'""""'"v"""'"""""""""'""""'"/^ 200^ ^?i xpRT(l^i^^r) ^^rrw^Ff^33E?^r ~SB : HON'BLBSHRI JJJSTlCB_?^TmK^THW^eEK 04.09.2009 Shri Roop Naik, counsel fc Shri Vivek Sharma, P.L. fc Conterition of the counse: identical mattei]s have been deci|ied by this Court involving the same issue anci he 'has flled copy 813/2007 (Ram Kumar Sahu 65 He conliendCLfeat as the case stage he may be permitted to \ make representation before competent authority be direc statement before this Court as the petitioner makes a represer] the same shall be decided strictlj Accordingly, the petition | liberty as aforesaid. If the petil concerned respondent within a receipt of copy of this order^ the | a further period of four months It is made clear that thj ^i<<{ci<ii'? ^i*i<A ^ 'fe^ '<r»{^i< ^>3tRR3:?T^r |r the petitioner. ir the Stafce, for the petitioner is that number of |3f one such order as W.P.(S) No. ^Others Vs. State of C.G. 8s another). [>f the petitioner is identical, at this 7ithdraw this petition with liberty to |he competent authority and the ;ted to decide the representation expeditiously. State counsel contends tl|.at at this stage he cannot make any to whether case of the petitioner is identical fco the case as aforem^-itioned. However, he submits that if ^tation to the concerned respondent,- ^ in accordance with law. !is dismissed as withdra-wn with the ioner makes a representation to the beriod of one month from the date of jsame is expected to' be decided within rom the date of its receipt. 'y) Court has not commented on the merits of the case and the authdrities concerned are free to decide the representation of the petitioner ^trictly in accordance with law. Sd/- pritinker Diwaker judge