IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1120 of 2009 Between: 1 G.Ramachandaiah S/o.Ramaiah R/o. M. Kotha Palli, Mydukur, Kadapa District. 2 C. Krishnaiah S/o. C. Pedda Chennaiah R/o. Sitaramanjaneyapuram, Nandyal Road, Kydukur, Kadapa District. 3 M. Naga Sankar Reddy S/o. M. Nagi Reddy R/o. H.No. 2/74, Karanam Street, Mydukur, Kadapa District. 4 M. Ayyavaru S/o.M. Pedda Ayyavarappa R/o. Cherla Palli, Onipenta (PO) Mydukur, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioner and Director Agriculature Marketing , Government of A.P. Hyderabad. 2 Agriculture Marketing Committee Mydukur, Kadapa District, Rep. by its Secretary 3 Bharat Security Services, 7-518-2, NGO Colony, Kadapa, Rep. by its Managing Director. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MR. J.LAXMINARAYANA FOR MR.L.J.VEERA REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioners herein pray that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 1st respondent in dispensing with the services of the petitioners as security guards in the 2nd respondent marketing committee in Memo No. D.AS (1)9190/2008 dt. 1-1-2009 without any notice and without any allegation on the ground that the petitioners were involved in the surprise check conducted by ACB officials as illegal, unjust arbitrary highhanded, against principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the Memo No. D.S(1)9190/2008 dt. 1-1-2008 issued by the 1st respondent and also the consequential proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Roc No. 176/2008 dt. 7-1-2009.” Sri J.Laxminarayana, learned counsel representing S r i L.J.Veera Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the writ petition in terms of letter, dated 01.04.2009 filed in the Registry. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.1408 of 2009 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 2nd APRIL, 2009. Note: issue c.c. in two (2) days. kvni