IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-33664 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: November 17, 2010 Vijay @ Rajesh and others …..Petitioners versus Narender Kumar and another .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the petitioner s .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) After arguing at some length, Mr. Kotla, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to petitioners to raise all their pleas before the trial court at an appropriate stage. Learned counsel, however, submits that petitioners are residents of village Seharmalkpur while the trial is pending in the court at Panipat. He therefore, prays that personal appearance of the petitioners may be exempted except on the dates it is necessary. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in case an application is moved before the trial court for exemption from personal appearance of the petitioners, the same shall be considered by the trial court in accordance with law. The trial court may exempt Crl.Misc.No.M-33664 of 2010 - 2 - the personal appearance of the petitioners on such terms and conditions as it deems necessary. The petitioners may be allowed to appear through their counsel except on the dates when their presence before the trial court is absolutely necessary. November 17, 2010 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE