1 CRA-256-09.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATINO NO. 256 OF 2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION 237 OF 200 with CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 238 OF 2009 Smt. Chhaya Ravindra Gaud ... Appellant (Orig. accused) vs. Shri Praharshan Umakant Bhavsar & Anr. Respondents Mr. M.B.Shirsat Advocate, for the appellant Mr. I.A. Shaikh,Advocate for the respondent No.1. Mr. P.S.Hingorani, APP, for the respondent No.2. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 18th March, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The applicant had issued a cheque of Rs.50,000/- towards balance payment of the contract money for the work done by the complainant with the contractor. The cheque was dishonoured and inspite of statutory notice, payment was not made. The trial Court, after hearig the parties, convicted and sentenced her under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to pay fine of Rs. 70,000/- and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. Out of 2 CRA-256-09.sxw the find amount, a sum of Rs.60,000/- was directed to be paid to the complainant as compensation. Appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed by the Sessions Court. Against that, this Revision Application is filed. 3. The learned Counsel for the appellant-accused makes a statement that whole of the fine amount has already been deposited as per the order of the trial Court. 4. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not see any reason to interfere in the said orders. 5. Therefore, the Revision Application stands dismissed. 6. As the Revision Application is dismissed, Criminal Application Nos. 237/2009 and 238/2009 do not survive and stand disposed of accordingly. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)