IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI MONDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2009 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(Crl.).No. 328 of 2009(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- D.BABU, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.DAMODARAN, KARTHIKA VILLA, MAROOR P.O., ELAMANNOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. K.SHAJ SRI.L.RAJ MOHAN SRI.SAJJU.S RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADOOR. 4. SUB INSPECTOR, ENATHU POLICE STATION. 5. RAJESH KUMAR, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI, PUTHENVEETTILPARAMBIL, LACKOOR, MALLASSERY P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA. 6. RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI, PUTHENVEETTILPARAMBIL, LACKOOR, MALLASSERY P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA. BY G.P. SMT. SMITHA SUKUMARAN. ADV. SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS FOR R6 SRI.ROSHEN.D.ALEXANDER FOR R6 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT & M.C. HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(Cri) No. 328 of 2009-S ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of December, 2009 JUDGMENT Basant,J. This judgment must be read in continuation of our earlier orders resting with the order dated 1/10/09. 2. Today, when the case is called, the learned counsel for the petitioner represents the petitioner. The alleged detenue and the 5th respondent are present. Both counsel submit that with the blessings of the parents of the alleged detenue and the parents of the 5th respondent, the marriage between the alleged detenue and the 5th respondent has been solemnized in accordance with the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act and the marriage has been registered with the Secretary (Local Registrar of Hindu Marriages), Pramandom Grama Panchayat, on 29/11/09. The same has been registered as W.P.(Cri) No. 328 of 2009 -: 2 :- Sl.No.66/09 dated 1/12/09. In these circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no further directions are necessary in this writ petition and this writ petition can now be dismissed as unnecessary. 3. Request accepted. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed as unnecessary now. Sd/- R. BASANT (Judge) Sd/- M.C. HARI RANI (Judge) Nan/ //True Copy// P.S. to Judge