IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7731 of 2009 1. MANOJ KUMAR, SON OF LATE BIDYASAGAR PRASAD, R/V AND P.S. TELHARA, DISTRICT NALANDA. 2. PRAFUL CHANDRA SINGH, SON OF SRI RAM SHARAN PRASAD SINGH, R/V AND P.S. BELCHHI, DISTRICT PATNA. 3. JITENDRA KUMAR, SON OF LATE SURYABANSH PRASAD, R/V GORIYA BIGHA, P.O. KOSHIYAWAN, DISTRICT NALANDA. 4. UDAY KUMAR SON OF JAGESHWAR PRASAD, R/V UGAN BIGHA, P.O. KABA, P.S. HILSA, DISTRICT NALANDA. 5. PRAKASH CHANDRA RAJAK SON OF SRI MANGAN LAL RAJAK, R/V RAHILPUR, P.O. MATIYARI, P.S. JOKIHAT,DISTRICT ARARIA------PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMNET OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF. 5. BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, BAILEY ROAD, PATNA--------RESPONDENTS. For the Petitioners : M/S Ajay Kumar Thakur, D. N. Singh, Imteyaz Ahmad, Advocates For the State : AC to GP-XIV, Advocate. For the B.P.S.C. : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate. ----------- 02. 09.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners are the Assistants-cum-Clerks. They were appointed against the Advertisement No.01/98 issued by the Bihar Public Service Commission. They have filed this writ application for a direction to the State respondents to consider their case for grant of revised pay scale of Rs. 4000-6000/-, as according to them other similarly situate persons had approached this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 13577 of 2006 for similar relief, which was allowed under order dated 17.12.2007, against which the State respondents preferred L.P.A. No. 522 of 2008, which was also dismissed under order dated 29.9.2008. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that their case is also covered by the aforesaid two orders dated 17.12.2007 and - 2 - 29.9.2008. 4. Let the District Magistrate, Nalanda consider the representation of the petitioners in the light of the aforesaid two orders dated 17.12.2007 and 29.9.2008 and pass appropriate reasoned order in accordance with law as early as possible in any case within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. In the event, representation is allowed, it goes without saying that petitioners be allowed the consequential benefit. 5. This writ application is accordingly disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J)