W r. BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH 3“ , AT BILASPUR $ *Wwgmx CASE No££z§§z%" APPgLLANT /Oommissioner of Income Tax, Raipur VERSUS ‘\ mig RESPONDENT /Shri Balkrishna Agrawal, ; 24- Dungaji Colony, Raipur. ” I ‘ V 1 . V ' E ! APPEAL Uls. 260‘AI OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 DIVIslon Bench - LY ‘ Pnr’k‘a ”m "‘ 'rendra M. .ra & Hon ble bhn R.N. bnandr‘lkar, JJ 02!9.9/2009 Shri S. Rajeshwara Fvtao, counsel for the appenant. The matter is Hsted oih-defau!t. z"-4/ ‘ Learned coun$el for the appellant nrays for and is granted four week’s time to remove :he default. lt le madevclear that if the default is not removed within the / stimulated period. the anneal shall be liable to be dismissed Without any further reference to the Bench. SdL a l DEERENEWU\B£EEH%A '.... Judge Sdl- - . RN Chandrakar l ‘ g . Judge