IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 11TH MARCH 2010 / 20TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 6613 of 2010(B) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.A.MOHAMMED, S/O.AHAMMED, ARAKKAVEETTIL HOUSE, VADANAPPALLY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.ANILKUMAR (KALLESSERIL) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, V.I.P.ROAD, KALOOR, COCHIN - 682 017. 2. P.M.MOHAMMED SHERIEF, S/O.MOHAMMED, PUTHIYAVEETTIL, VADANAPPALLY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT (SECRETARY, VADANAPPALLY THEKKEY JAMA-ATH MAHAL COMMITTEE, VADANAPPALLY P.O.) 3. P.K.MUHAMMED HANEEFA, PETRON, VADANAPPALLY THEKKE JAMA-ATH MAHAL COMMITTEE, VADANAPPALLY P.O. THRISSUR DISTRICT 4. K.K.MUHAMMED HANEEFA HAJI, COMMITTEE MEMBER, VADANAPPALLY THEKKE JAMA-ATH MAHAL COMMITTEE, VADANAPPALLY P.O THRISSUR DISTRICT 5. R.E.ABDUL NAZAR, COMMITTEE MEMBER, VADANAPPALLY THEKKE JAMA-ATH MAHAL COMMITTEE, VADANAPPALLY P.O THRISSUR DISTRICT 6. P.A.MUHAMMED, COMMITTEE MEMBER, VADANAPPALLY THEKKE JAMA-ATH MAHAL COMMITTEE, VADANAPPALLY P.O THRISSUR DISTRICT 7. P.K.HAMEEDALI, COMMITTEE MEMBER, VADANAPPALLY THEKKE JAMA-ATH MAHAL COMMITTEE, VADANAPPALLY P.O THRISSUR DISTRICT 8. N.K.ABOOBACKER HAJI, COMMITTEE MEMBER, VADANAPPALLY THEKKE JAMA-ATH MAHAL COMMITTEE, VADANAPPALLY P.O THRISSUR DISTRICT 9. A.T.ABOOBACKER HAJI, S/O.ABDUL MAJEED, THEPPARAMBIL HOUSE, VADANAPPALLY P.O THRISSUR DISTRICT ADV. SRI.M.M.SAIDU MUHAMMED,SC,WAKF BOARD FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.6613 of 2010 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 11th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the member of Vadanappally Thekke Jama- ath Mahal and is a beneficiary of the said Wakf which is a registered Wakf before the Kerala State Wakf Board. 2. The 9th respondent is administrating the same for the past 35 years by way of succession from the predecessors of his family. The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the first respondent to take up the administration or to appoint a Mutawalli in the office at the earliest under Section 63 of the Wakf Act 1995. Various averments have been made in the writ petition to justify the said plea and reference has been made to the earlier proceedings also. Ext.P4 is the application submitted by the petitioner before the Wakf Board under Section 63 of the Wakf Act. Ext.P2 is the judgment of this Court in C.R.P.1036/2005 wherein already a direction has been issued to the Wakf Board to finalise the proceedings within a specified time. 3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Wakf Board submitted that within six months time a final decision can be taken after hearing all the affected parties. W.P.(C)No.6613 of 2010 2 4. There will be a direction to the first respondent to take an appropriate decision on Ext.P4 after hearing the petitioner and respondents 2 to 9 and any other parties within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not considered anything on the merits of the matter or the entertainability of the petition. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE skj