In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CWP No. 4098 of 2006 Date of decision:1.5.2008 Poonam and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Rajinder Goyal,Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.M.L.Saggar, Addl.A.G.Haryana and Mr.Ashish Kapoor, Addl.A.G.Haryana. **** JUDGMENT M.M.KUMAR, J. The prayer made by the petitioners is that the notifications dated 11.11.2002 (Annexure P-2) and 7.11.2003 (Annexure P-3), which are under Sections 4 and 6 respectively of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity 'the Act') and Award dated 31.10.2005 (Annexure P-4) be set aside. It is not disputed that the petitioners have not filed objections under Section 5-A of the Act. The cases of such nature are not covered by the State policy dated 26.10.2007, which provide for release of land in certain cases. However, once objections under Section 5-A of the Act have not been filed then it is presumed that the petitioners have nothing to offer against the acquisition of land or provide justification for not acquiring the land. Therefore, the matter CWP No. 4098 of 2006 -2- is not covered by the policy as pointed out by the Director, Urban Estate, Haryana in his report dated 5.4.2008 (Annexure R-1), which has been given on the directions issued by this Court on 27.2.2008. Accordingly, the writ petition is without any merits and the same is dismissed. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE (SABINA) May 01, 2008 JUDGE anita