WPCRL No. 118 of 2010 With Stay App. No. 783 / 10 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. M.K. Ray, Advocate present for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate for the State present for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mrs. Prabha Naithani, Advocate present for respondent No. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought quashing of the first information report No. 21 of 2010, relating to offences punishable under Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, and one punishable under Section 406 of I.P.C., police station Gadarpur, District Udham Singh Nagar. Briefly stated, it is alleged in the first information report that the settled marriage between the petitioner No. 1 Gaurav Kumar and daughter of the complainant / respondent No. 3 could not materialized due to the non- fulfillment of demand of dowry, after the ring ceremony. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties, and after going through the papers on record, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the investigation in the matter. The writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that if the petitioners surrender before the court concerned, their bail application if moved, shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (Stay Application No. 783 of 2010 also stands dismissed). (P.C. P., J.) 19.02.2010 HN