IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23652 of 2010 SUNIL RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 30.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner is husband of the deceased and admittedly, his marriage has taken place with deceased in the year 2006 but deceased died in mysterious circumstances in the year 2009. Furthermore, during the course of investigation, it came to light that relation of the petitioner with deceased was not cordial and furthermore, decomposed dead body was recovered in course of investigation and I.O. has found sign of removing evidence from the place of the occurrence which is evident from perusal of paragraph 4 of the case diary. Since the petitioner is said to be uxoricide and there is sufficient materials against him on the case diary, I do not feel it proper to release him on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail, in connection with Rosera P.S. Case no 39/2009, is rejected. Moreover, petitioner is languishing in jail since 17.12.2009. Therefore, the concerned court is directed to expedite the trial of petitioner, and if the trial of petitioner is not concluded within nine months, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before this court. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)