IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12188 of 2009 SUBODH KUMAR @ SUBODHAN RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 12.08.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 467, 468, 471, 474, 414, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Looking to the F.I.R., it is but apparent that the petitioner was found sitting in the vehicle as driver. F.I.R. discloses involvement of co-accused Praveen Kumar @ Guddu in the racket of purchase and sale of stolen vehicles. Learned counsel submits that he was employed by aforesaid Praveen Kumar @ Guddu and was simply driving the vehicle. It is contended that in course of investigation also it has come that the petitioner was sitting in the vehicle as a driver employed by the main accused i.e. Praveen Kumar @ Guddu. It is contended that he is in jail custody since 16.11.2008 and has absolutely no criminal antecedent as has been also found and recorded in para 104 of the case diary. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be 2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 351 of 2008, subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be the own/close family members of the petitioner. P.K. (K.K. Mandal, J.)