IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12946 of 2008 Guddu Singh Jha & Ors Versus State Of Bihar & Anr ----------- For the Petitioner---- Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur Mr. Amit Kumar For the State---- Dashrath Mehta For the OP.----- Bipin Bihari Singh Upendra Kumar 6 05.09.2011 This .application, under Section 482 Cr. P.C, is directed to quash the order dated 5.12.07 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge F.T.C –III Darbhanga in Criminal Revision NO. 356 of 2007 allowing the Criminal Revision petition filed by OP No. 2 against the order dated 21.8.2007 of Complaint Case No.667 of 2007.issuing the summons against accused petitioners finding prima facie case only for offence under Section 127,323,341 and 380 I.P.C on inquiry Under Section 204 Cr.P.C The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the learned Sessions Judge through the impugned order has not directed for re-inquiry in the Complaint case arriving to finding that the case under Section 3 S.C S.T ( P.D.A) Act is made out but ordered for proceeding further in accordance with law which is illegal. The impugned order goes to show that the learned Sessions Judge F.T.C –III Darbahanga, on hearing the parties, going through the record arrived at finding that witnesses have consistently stated supporting the allegation for offence under Section 3 S.C S.T ( P.D.A) Act . Accordingly ordered that the copy of order be transmitted to the lower court along with record for proceeding further in accordance with law. 2 This direction clearly indicates that the direction is for further inquiry in the compliant case as such no illegality appears in the impugned order. In the result this application is stands dismissed. Namita ( Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)