1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI. APPLICATION NO.1035 OF 2008. ( NAZAR HAIDAR MOHD. ALI HAIDARI Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR,J. DATED : APRIL 04, 2008. 1. Heard Shri D.C.Chahande, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri D.B.Patel, learned A.P.P. for the respondent/ State. 2. Interim order was passed on 24.03.2008. 3. Reply of the learned A.P.P. shows that there are statements of three witnesses to show that some amounts were obtained from them by the applicant for getting loan sanctioned to them from Parmatma Ek Sevak Bank. It is also mentioned in the reply that the applicant promised one Rajesh Bhure to give him employment in the Bank and on this pretext amount was accepted. 2 4. Ex-facie there is no reason for the witnesses to make fake statements against the applicant. Parmatma Ek Sevak Bank does not seem to have lodged any report. 5. In these circumstances, as the applicant contends that he has been falsely implicated, interim anticipatory bail, granted on 24.03.2008, is hereby confirmed, subject to earlier conditions, besides the condition that the applicant shall furnish security to the extent of Rs.One Lac for the refund of these amounts to the witnesses/ complainants, after trial. 6. The application is disposed of accordingly. 7. It is made clear that this order is without prejudice to all the defences which the applicant can raise. 8. Hamdast granted. JUDGE RR.