•!»• IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION ^(3 O OF 2011 PETITIONER [Accusedl 'liQ' P.R. Ns. presefltetl!w»ri, t^M^- RESPONDENT [Complainanfl steiS Smt. Rekha Singh, W/o Shri Vijay Singh, aged about 43 years, R/o MIG-1/57, P.S.: Sector-6, District-Durg VERSUS Varendra Nath Mukharjee, S/o Shri D.N. Mukharjee, aged about 40 years, R/o Qtr. No.2/A, Road No.NPA Zone-3, Sector-11, Khursipar, P.S.-Chhawni, District- Durg CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODEOF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE KIGH CQURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPOS • i.m'nri'isr.s? sjro .rrTo'pr^B6 oorT'i PETJTIQNBR RESPOKDENT CR.M.P.iIO. 320/2011 Smt. Rekha Singh versus Varendra Nath Mukherjee -^; Smt. Pouzia Mirza, couns^ for the petitioner. PETITIOK DNDER SECTION 482 OF THB CRIMiNAL PROCBDl?g^CODB The oresent oetition filed under Section 482 Cr.p.C. is directed against the impugned order dated 7.5.2011 passed by the RevisionaJ Court in Cr.Rev. No. 21/2011 affirming the order of the ieamed Judicial Magistrate .First Class, Durg dated 11.1.11 whereby the appiication as fi'ied by the petitioner under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. was rejected. Contention of Smt. Mirza, counsel for the petitioner ss that by mistake certain relevant questions could not be put So the comoiainant and therefore one opportunity ought to have been granted by the Courts be!ow for the re-cross examination of the witnesses. Prom the dccuments as fiSed by the petitioner it is apparent that the corapSainant was cross-exaiTiinsd et iength by the petitioner. Leamed MaRistrate and the revisiorial Court have considered ail the aspects of ths case and considerinK the orowsions cf Secticn 31.1 of the Cr.P.C. ; t'ind no illegaHty in the order impugned. The revision is iiable to be dismissed and the sams is accordingiy dismissed at the motion stage itself. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge E,/