Civil Revision No.2245 of 2009(O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.2245 of 2009(O&M) Decided on : January 21, 2011 Sanjay Kaushik ... Petitioner VERSUS Ranjit Singh Chhajalwandi and another ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.G.S.Dhindsa, Advocate for Mr.S.S.Toor, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.B.S.Sewak, Advocate for respondent No.1. A.N.JINDAL, J.- Assailed in this petition is the order dated 21.2.2009, vide which the evidence of the plaintiff – petitioner was closed by order. Heard. On perusal of the impugned order, it transpires that the petitioner had made a categoric statement on 24.2.2007, wherein, he had given an undertaking to conclude the entire evidence on the next date, failing which his evidence would be treated as closed. However, even thereafter, the petitioner was given number of opportunities i.e, on 2.6.2007, 11.10.2007, 18.2.2008, 2.5.2008, 11.9.2008, 15.11.2008 and 8.1.2009, but he failed to conclude the evidence. It was only thereafter that the Trial Civil Revision No.2245 of 2009(O&M) [ 2 ] Court vide the impugned order had to close the evidence by order. In the circumstances, there is no justification to grant any further opportunity to the petitioner to lead his evidence. No merit. Dismissed. January 21, 2011 ( A.N.JINDAL ) `gian' JUDGE