HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 4213 OF 2011 ORDER: This revision is ﬁled against the order dated 22.11.2010 passed in I.A.No.486 of 2010 in I.A.No. 210 of 2010 in O.S.No. 493 of 2002 by the XIII Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC), City Civil Courts, Secunderabad. Petitioner herein is the second defendant in the suit viz., O.S.No. 493 of 2002. Pending suit, plaintiﬀs ﬁled I.A.No. 210/2009 for passing ﬁnal decree in that second defendant was set exparte on 16.2.2010. Hence he filed a petition viz., 486 of 2010 under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone delay of 232 days in ﬁling application to set aside exparte order passed in IA.No. 210 of 2009. The Court below dismissed the application holding that the delay was not properly explained except stating that the petitioner is old aged and suﬀering from ailments, no evidence is let in to prove the same. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the court below ought to have appreciated the fact that the petitioner could not attend the court on 16.2.2010 to participate in proceedings of I.A.NO. 210 of 2009 only because he could not trace out the summons he received to know exact day of hearing. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for respondents submits that the order passed is quite reasonable and there are no ground to interfere with order passed. Heard the learned counsel appearing for both sides and also perused the material made available on record. As seen from the record, I.A.No.486 of 2011 was ﬁled to condone the delay of 232 days in ﬁling the application to set aside exparte order passed in I.A.No. 210 of 2009. Further, when the petitioner is having knowledge of the proceedings why such delay is caused is also not explained properly. Therefore, the court below dismissed the application observing that except stating that petitioner is old aged and suﬀering from ailments, no evidence is let in to prove the same. Hence, I see no reasons to interfere with the order passed by the court below and the revision is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J DATE: 18th November 2011 KA