HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO Civil Revision Petition No.1493 of 2006 Date: 19-8-2011 Between K.Seetha Ramaiah … Petitioner/Plaintiff and M.Ramulu and another … Respondents/Defendants HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO Civil Revision Petition No.1493 of 2006 Order: The civil revision petition is filed aggrieved by the order dated 06-02-2006 made in I.A.No.89 of 2006 in O.S.No.1447 of 2004 on the file of the VI Additional Senior Civil Judge (Fast Track Court), Medchal, Ranga Reddy district. 2. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No.1447 of 2004. The suit was filed by one K.Venugopal Rao, General Power of Attorney Holder of K.Sitharamaiah. The GPA Holder filed the application I.A.No.89 of 2006 on behalf of K.Sitharamaiah for return of the documents marked as Exs.A-1 to A-3 and the trial Court ordered for return of the documents to the original owner on substituting the certified copies. Being aggrieved, the present civil revision petition is filed. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that originally the suit was filed by the GPA Holder on behalf of K.Sitharamaiah and during the course of enquiry, Exs.A-1 to A-3 were marked on his behalf, and the suit was disposed of and subsequently, the GPA Holder filed the application I.A.No.89 of 2006 for return of the said documents, whereas the trial Court ordered for return of the said documents to the original owner i.e. K.Sitharamaiah. 4. As seen from the record, one K.Venugopal Rao, GPA Holder of K.Sitharamaiah, filed the suit on behalf of K.Sitharamaiah. The trial Court allowed the GPA Holder to file the suit on behalf of K.Sitharamaiah. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner draws the attention of this Court to the General Power of Attorney, dated 25-10-2004, wherein at serial No.13 it is recited that the GPA Holder is authorized to file, withdraw and obtain any documents either from the court or from the Government offices, Revenue authorities and Sub Registrars’ offices etc. 6. When the trial Court allowed the GPA Holder to file the suit on behalf of K.Sitharamaiah and the said suit was disposed of, the GPA Holder, who filed the suit on behalf of K.Sitharamaiah, is entitled to receive all the documents as he filed the documents during the course of trial. Therefore, ordering to return Exs.A-1 to A-3 to the original owner, in my view, is not sustainable as the GPA Holder is entitled to take return of the documents in view of the permission granted to him for filing the suit on behalf of K.Sitharamaiah. 7. Accordingly, the impugned order is modified ordering to return Exs.A-1 to A-3 to the GPA Holder K.Venugopal Rao, on substituting certified copies, and on his due identification by the advocate concerned. 8. With the above modification, the civil revision petition is allowed. No costs. ___________________ K.S.APPA RAO, J. 19th August, 2011. Ak HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO Civil Revision Petition No.1493 of 2006 19th August, 2011. (Ak)