BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Ninth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. TAMILVANAN CRL OP(MD) No.15751 of 2011 CASE MANI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.9 Vs STATE: INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANAMADURAI ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DT. (CR.NO.9/2011) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.KANNAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner / A9, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 2. The petitioner / A9 apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498(A), 494 and 506(ii) I.P.C., and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and 4 of Tamil Nadu Protection of Women Harassment Act r/w 109 of IPC, in Crime No.9 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police, has come forward with the application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail. 3. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits the petitioner has been falsely implicated and she has nothing to do with the alleged offence and there is no bad antecedents against the petitioner. 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent has not disputed the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioner. The petitoiner / A9, being a woman accused, cannot be prosecuted under the protection of Women Harassment Act. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioner, I find it just and reasonable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on the following conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of her arrest, on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District Munsif-Cum-Judicial magistrate, Manamadurai and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shallstand dismissed. sd/- 09/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAMADURAI 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SIVAGANGAI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANAMADURAI ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DT +1. CC to M/S. V.KANNAN Advocate SR.No.43207 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15751 of 2011 Date :09/12/2011 SMA/16.12.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/