IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.38247 -M of 2010 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : AUGUST 24, 2011 HARDEEP SINGH ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. DPS Randhawa, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. DD Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) 1 This petition has been filed under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for quashing of FIR No.85 dated 10.4.2009 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Division No.5, Civil Lines, Ludhiana City (Annexure P-1). 2 Learned counsel for the respondent-State has pointed out that the charges were framed against the petitioner on 5.12.2010. The factum of framing of charges has not been brought out in the petition. The order framing charges and the charge-sheet have not been challenged. 3 I find that the petitioner had sworn an affidavit in support of pleadings in the petition on 22.12.2010. Considering Criminal Misc. No.38247 -M of 2010 (O&M) 2 the nature of issue, it was relevant for the petitioner to have mentioned the factum of framing of charges. The order framing charges and the charge-sheet have not been challenged. 4 In view of the above, the petition in the present form cannot be entertained. 5 The petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to take all the grounds taken in this petition before the trial court, during the course of trial. August 24, 2011 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?