CAW/2698/2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2698 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7865 OF 2006 Baban Ramchandra Kokare ... Applicant V/s. Borosil Glass Works Ltd., Mumbai ... Respondent Mr. S.S. Pathak for the Applicant. Mr. Piyush Shah for the Respondent. CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATE : 20 TH DECEMBER, 2010. P.C. : 1. The Civil Application has been filed for modification of the order passed by this Court while granting interim relief to the petitioner i.e. the respondent in the present Civil Application. The workman, i.e. the applicant herein, has stated that the factory premises in which the applicant was working have been sold to a Builder by the respondent herein and, therefore, he apprehends that in case he succeeds in the Petition, he would not be able to recover the amount. 2. Mr. Shah appearing for the respondent herein opposes the Civil Application by contending that a similar application for deposit of the back-wages was made CAW/2698/2010 2 by the workman when the Petition was admitted, which was refused. He submits that there are no changed circumstances because the Company is still functioning. 3. In my view, it would be necessary to protect the workman in view of the fact that the factory premises have been sold recently. Accordingly, the respondent herein, i.e. the original petitioner, shall deposit the amount mentioned in Clause (iii) of the operative part of the Award dated 30th June, 2006 passed by the Labour Court, Mumbai in Reference (IDA) No.333 of 1999. The amount shall be deposited in this Court within a period of six weeks from today. 4. Mr. Shah, the learned Advocate for the respondent herein, i.e. the original petitioner, states that if the Gratuity or any other legal dues which remained to be paid when the services of the workman were terminated will be paid to him within six weeks from today. 5. The Civil Application is disposed of.