IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.1455 of 2011 Date of Decision : February 03, 2011. M/s J.T.G. Alloys Private Limited .....Petitioner versus Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.J.R.Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr.Anil Shukla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Vikas Chatrath, Advocate, for the caveator-respondent Nos.2 to 4. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-Industry has been served with a notice dated 15th October, 2010 (Annexure P-6) highlighting that on account of the electric meter installed in the factory premises having been tampered with, the petitioner is liable to deposit the compensation of Rs.4,33,24,039/-. The petitioner-Industry has submitted its objections to the afore-stated provisional assessment vide representation dated 25th October, 2010 (Annexure P-16). It is stated that those objections have not been decided so far. C.W.P.No .1455 of 2011 2 Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4, who are on caveat, states that the objections will be disposed of within a period of one month. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim. Meanwhile, if the petitioner deposits the demanded compensation without prejudice to its right, the electricity connection be restored. Dasti. February 03, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE