HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G.S. SINGHVI Writ Petition No.16859 of 1995 Between: Smt.G. Savitramma … Petitioner And Union of India, rep. by its Secretary, Telecommunications, New Delhi And three others. … Respondents :: ORDER:: Counsel for Petitioner : Sri M.V. Suresh Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Sri A. Rajasekhar Reddy, Asst. Solicitor General of India. Counsel for Respondents 2 to 4 : Smt.T. Balajayasri, Standing Counsel for BSNL December 14, 2005 In this petition, the petitioner has essentially challenged bill dated 1-12-1992 raised by the Telecommunications Department. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that his client has already paid 50% of the amount specified in the bill and that the remaining amount will be paid within a period of four weeks. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel, it is not necessary to adjudicate on the legality of the impugned bill or the petitioner’s claim for grant of rebate and the writ petition is liable to be disposed of as infructuous. Ordered accordingly. G.S. SINGHVI, CJ December 14, 2005 svs