CR No.6087of 2009 - 1 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.6087 of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 30.10.2009 **** Kuljinder Singh . . . . Petitioner VS. V.K. Duggal . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Salil Bali, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. D.R. Bansal, Advocate for the respondent **** SURYA KANT J.(ORAL) (1). This revision petitioner is preferred by the tenant who has been ordered to be evicted from the demised premises comprising residential house No.924, Phase-VII, SAS Nagar, Mohali, by the Rent Controller, SAS Nagar, Mohali vide order dated 24.12.2008 and which has been further upheld by the Appellate Authority, SAS Nagar, Mohali vide its judgement dated 09.09.2009. (2). The respondent-landlord is on Caveat. (3). During the course of hearing, the parties have entered into a compromise, in terms whereof the petitioner-tenant has made a Statement on Oath to the effect that he does not want to press this revision petition on merits and shall vacate the demised premises on or before 31st May, 2010. He has undertaken to pay the arrears of rent by 30th CR No.6087of 2009 - 2 - November, 2009 and that he shall continue to pay the future rents on or before 10th day of every calendar month. The petitioner-tenant has also agreed not to pursue the criminal case got registered against the landlord on account of misunderstanding between the parties. (4). Similarly, the respondent-landlord has agreed to withdraw two complaints filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as soon as the possession of the demised premises is handed over to him on or before the expiry of the agreed period. The respondent-landlord has further agreed to make an appropriate statement for compounding of the criminal complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, in which the brother of the petitioner-tenant has already been convicted, besides withdrawing the criminal revision also filed by him for enhancement of sentence. (5). In this view of the matter, this revision petition is disposed of in the above noticed agreed terms. Suffice it to say that in case the petitioner-tenant fails to honour the undertaking given by him before this Court, the respondent-landlord shall be entitled to take possession of the demised premises by seeking police help besides taking other legal action like contempt proceedings. (6). Disposed of. (7). Dasti. (SURYA KANT) CR No.6087of 2009 - 3 - JUDGE 30.10.2009 vishal shonkar