CWP No.8683 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8683 of 2010 Date of decision: 13.09.2011 Balwant Kaur ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Alok Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jaswinder Singh, DAG, Punjab. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of present writ petition land has been allotted to the petitioner by the State Government, however, State Government has charged in excess, which State Government is liable to refund. He further states that mutation has not been made in favour of the petitioner pursuant to the allotment in favour of the petitioner and no rasta has been provided to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly stated that since land has been allotted to the petitioner, therefore, present petition has been rendered infructuous, it may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to move appropriate representation to the State Government to refund the excess amount and to get the mutation done pursuant to the allotment in favour of the petitioner and provide rasta. He states that if no action is taken by the respondents on the CWP No.8683 of 2010 -2- representation, petitioner shall be at liberty to file fresh writ petition for redressal of his grievances. Dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. Representation if moved shall be decided by the respondents within 30 days. (Alok Singh) Judge September 13, 2011 R.S.