IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 10925 of 2011-C & connected matters. Decided on: December 12, 2011. 1. CWP No. 10925 of 2011-C. Jaswant Kaur, W/O Sh. Ram Singh Saini R/O Vill. Arniala (L), P.O.-Kotla Kalan, Distt. Una, H.P. ……Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary (Education), to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-171 002. 2. Director of Elementary Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla- 171003. 3. Deputy Director of Elementary Education, Distt. Una, H.P. …….Respondents. 2. CWP No. 10959 of 2011-F. Manju Sharma, W/O Sh. Ashwani Kumar Sharma R/O Near DAV School, Tehsil Dehra and Distt. Kangra, H.P. Presently Working as lecturer in Chemistry at G.S.S.S. Dhaliara, Kangra, H.P. ……Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary (Education), to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-171 002. 2. Director of Higher Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla- 171003. …….Respondents. 3. CWP No. 10960 of 2011-F. Ranjana Dingley, D/O Sh. Satpal Kapahi R/O, C/O Kapahi Niwas, Khjanchi Mohalla, Kotwali Bazar, Dharamsala, Distt. Kangra, H.P. Presently working as lecturer in English at DIET, Kangra at Dharamsala, H.P. ……Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Himachal Pradesh through Secretary (Education), 2 to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-171 002. 2. Director of Higher Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla- 171003. …….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Adarsh K. Vashishta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010, Ravi Kumar versus State of H.P. & anr. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondents concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment, referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of production of copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition(s) and the copy of the judgment, referred to above. 2. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 12th December, 2011. (Justice Dev Darshan Sud), (vs) Judge.