1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 213 OF 2011 (Harshal @ Bunty Haridas Gedam vs. The Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mrs. Archana Nair, Advocate (appointed) for the petitioner. Shri D.B. Yengal, APP for the respondents. ….. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. APRIL 08, 2011. Heard Mrs. Nair, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Yengal, learned APP for the respondents. The petitioner had preferred the application for parole on the ground of illness of his mother. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the application was preferred in the month of May 2010, till today the said application has not been decided by the concerned authority. She also pointed out that the Police report in relation to application for parole are favourable. The said favourable reports are annexed to the petition. Looking to the fact that the application for parole is pending since long, the concerned authorities are directed to dispose of the said application within a 2 period of three weeks from today. Petition is disposed of with the above directions. The learned APP undertakes to communicate this order to the concerned authorities. The advocate appointed for the petitioner be paid fees as per rules. Office to communicate this order to the petitioner, who is a convict in Central Prison, Nagpur. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.