IN THE HIGHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. _^J_[0_/2007 PETITONER : "Jitendra Dubey Son of Late Shri Nand ^ ...• )\ Kumar Dufaey, aged about 39 years, ..•••'/ -V ^^y.. ^y^~.^ ..^L.^\ .-••"" ..-^^••^' ,^^'y c-^" ^"' <<6°<1...--'" Assistant Grade-li Resident ofChhuikhadan, Tahsil and District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) ^'^- RESPONDENTS ^ ,^7^ ^ ,<?p^~ ^\\A^ Ov /7\'-^v ^C^ ,fo ^~\ ^ rry»^' >%^<-°' ¥- -Versus- 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. District Education OfRcer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh). 3. Block Education OfRcer, Chhuikhadan, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh). 4. Shri N.D. Devdas, Assistant Grade-11, Office of Block Education Officer, Chhuria, Tahsil and District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLE WRIT. ORDER OR DIRECTION TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. ^' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BiLASPUR Single Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pritinker Dhwaker PETITIONER Writ Petition (S) No. 6110 of2007 Jitendra Dubev Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisaarh & others. Shri Saniav K. Aarawal. counse! for the oetitioner. Shri Atvind Dubg'y', Panci La'wy'Qr for thc Stats. WRiTPETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTSTUTSON OF SNDIA OR_DER (06.07.2009) With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finallv. Chailenae in the instant writ petition is to the order dated 21.9.2007 fAnnexure P-2) passed bv the State Government wherebv the petitioner was transferred from the post of Asstt. Grade II in the office ofthe Block Education Officer, Chhuikhadan to Govt- Hia.h School, Buchatola, Biock Chhuriva, Distt. Rainandaaon, in vioiation of the transfer DoSicv This Court entertainina the arievance of the petitioner had aranted stav in his favour vide order dated 29.10-2007. In view of the fact that this petitlon was fifed on 3.10.2007 and stav was also aranted in favour of the petjtjoner, the transfer order; so far as it retates to the petitioner is hereby quashed. However, the State Government would be at liberty to pass an order ifthe administrative exiaencv so warrant With the above observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Pritmker Diwaker Judge