1 APPLN5594&5595.sxw vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5594 OF 2009. The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant -versus Kalpesh harshad Mehta .. Respondent. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5595 OF 2009. The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant -versus Ghanshyam S Goswami .. Respondent. Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for the Applicant State in both the matters. Mrs. M.K. Kocharekar, for respondent in Application No.5594 of 2009 Mr. Girish Kulkarni, for respondent in Application No.5595 of 2009.... CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 20th September, 2010 P.C. 1. The State seeks cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondents in both the matters. The worst that can be said is that the respondents are Directors of Pramukh Builders and these two applicants had paid Rs,3,00,000/- to one Ulhas Paralkar who claimed title on the basis of a will which was forged. Probate granted by this Court on 28.l0.2008 in favour of Ulhas Paralkar was 2 APPLN5594&5595.sxw cancelled by the order of this Court dated l7th April,2009 after finding that the will was forged. Presuming that the respondent had paid Rs.3,00,000/- for getting the will probated for the purpose of purchasing property. Since the probate has been cancelled, it is not clear how custodial interrogation of the respondents would be necessary. The applications are, therefore, rejected. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)