IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.889 of 2011 Narmadeshwar Sharma . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. . ----------- 3. 13.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Counsel for the State produces an account payee cheque drawn in the name of the petitioner for a sum of Rs. 11,967/- drawn on the Punjab National Bank bearing No. 197719 dated 4.7.2011 which is handed over to the counsel for the petitioner during the course of the proceedings. Counsel for the petitioner however submits that it is no payment in accordance with Annexure-5 to the writ application and that no interest has been paid. There was no direction for payment of any specified amount. The order stated that the petitioner should be paid his legitimate dues. Keeping in mind the quantum of the amount paid, the Court in its contempt jurisdiction does not consider the present a matter serious enough to proceed on the aspect of interest in the contempt jurisdiction. If the petitioner represents and ask for details of the quantum on basis of which amount 2 mentioned in the cheque has been found payable, the Court directs the respondents to make the same available to the petitioner without delay so that the petitioner is able to seek remedies before an appropriate forum with regard to any further grievances that he may have. The application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)