HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 3281 OF 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the Order dated 8.06.2011 passed in I.A.No. 3372 of 2010 in O.S.No. 578 of 2010 by the II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Petitioner herein is the defendant and respondents herein are the plaintiffs in the suit viz., O.S.No. 578 of 2010. Suit was filed for eviction of the defendant, recovery of arrears of rent and for mesne profits. Plaintiffs also filed I.A under Order 15-A read with Section 151 CPC, to direct the respondent to pay admitted monthly rents for the lease property every month at the rate of Rs. 1,75,000/- from the date of the petition till the disposal of the suit. The Court below disposed of the I.A with the following directions: “a) Respondent is directed to pay rent at Rs. 1,75,000/- p.m from the calender month of October 2010 to till date, within one month i.e., on or before 8-7-2011 and he is also directed to continue such deposit every month on or before 8th of succeeding month either by way of depositing the same into the account of the petitioners in which the respondent was depositing prior to the filing the suit or by way of depositing the same into Court to the credit of the present case; (b) In default whereof, the petitioners/plaintiffs are at liberty to move appropriate application in terms of Order 15-A CPC; (c) The dispute with regard to refixation of quantum of rent and entitlement of respondent/defendant for adjustment of excess amount, if any, paid will be decided in suit while deciding the entitlement of petitioners/plaintiffs for pre-suit arrears of rent.” Under Order 15-A CPC, the respondents- plaintiffs have right to seek arrears of rent. Hence, the Court below very elaborately dealt with the issue and rightly disposed of the I.A as stated above. Hence, I see no reasons to interfere with the order passed by the Court below and the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J DATE: 23.09.2011 KA