^;^ HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ. Writ PetitioiLNo. 37880F 2006 PETITIONER Vs. Abdul Wahid, son of Abdul Majid, aged about 48 years, resident of Nehru Bhavan Road, Supela Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS 1. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 Secretary, R.T.A., Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. M/s Taxi Owner United Transport Company, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Regional Transport Authority, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Present: Shri B.K. Rawat, learned counsel forthe petitioner. Shri Vinay Harit, learned Dy. A.G. for the State and its authdrity. Shri Ajay Shrivastava, leamed counsel for respondent No.3. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 10thAugust, 2006) The two temporary permits granted by the second respondent to the petitioner have been set aside by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, the first respondent herein, on the ground that the routes in question are not formulated. That finding has been assailed in this writ petition by contending that in fact the routes are formulated. There is no necessity to appreciate the above factual contention and record any finding, because, no effective relief could be granted to the petitioner, at this distance of time. 1 say this, because, the temporary permits granted to the petitioner in ordinary course would have come to an end on 31.07.2006. The term of the permits spent itself long back. This writ petition has become infructuous and it is accordingly djsmissed. However, the contention of the petitioner that the routes in question are formulated is left open to be agitated before the Authorities under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, in an appropriate case. No costs— Sd/- ChiefJustice ^Ul^K^f--^»»!^S55SE!5^i£essi ^ssgSiaSfSSSiSSSS^^SSSSSSS^!SS3SS