o?xw > S§§§§LE QENW IN THE HIGH COURT OF BILASPUR AT CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION (s1 No. £%5é OF 2010 / PETITIONE : Narayan Prasad Mishra, R S/ o. late Shri Janmejay Mishra, aged about 48 years, Occupation ‘ Govt. Service (Peon), in the office of Govt. High School Salkhiya, Block Lailunga, Distt. Rajgarh (c. G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D. K. S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Rajpur (c. G.) 2) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal 'Welfare Department Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C. G.) Principal, Govt. High School Salkhiya, ' Block Lailunga, Distt. Raigarh (co) 4‘) Murlidhar Sharma, S/o. Keshav Prasad Sharma, Assistant Grade—III, Govt. High School Bijana, Block Tamnar, Raigarh Distt. Raigarh (C,G.) ” By this petition, the i direction to grant, benefit benefits. It is submitied that the a Contingency Paid Empioy from 22-12-1987, tater on, Daiiy Wage employee, appoi Estabiishment. Eariier, the pi Court claiming reguiarization passed directing the res representation. in compiianc Assistant Commissioner, Tri 20-05-2008 holding that as r petitioner wouid be considers View of the appropriate dir regard to filling-up the ba kiog post. Finaiiy, vide order dated 10.01 .2009 (Annexure P-3), he petitioner has been granted regular appointment on the post of Peon. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as espondents No. 4 and 5 who were ietitioner has prayed for issuance of 3f promotion with ail consequentiai petitioner, who was initially working as ee/Daiiy Wage Employee with effect after completion of three years as a ited as an employee of Work charged atitioner had filed a petition before this and promotion, wherein an order was pondent authorities to decide his e of order passed by this Court, the oal Deveiopment passed an order on o vacancies are avaiiable, case of the 5d on availability of vacancy as also in tions by the State Government with Wmw‘9@¢\h5g5é£ 200 mm (my) m awm ammm mm afsa anew 5.3: HON’BLE JUSTICE NR PRETgNKER DIWAKER 03-10-2910:- Shri Ajay Kumar Barik, counse! farthe petitioner. - Shri Vaibhav Goverdhe n, PL for the State. Heard on admission v VXI—HC—78 mm m 200 amm- (Wu) aé$6H& $ wmm WWW WW WW *1/ a; aim 311w appointed after 31.12.2988 Le. after the appointment of the petitioner as Daily Wage empioyee, have been regularized/promoted on the post of Peon, therefore, the petitioner is aiso entitled for the same benef . From the averments made n the petition and the grievance raised in the representattons, it s found that the petitioner has claimed promotion to the post of ssistant Grade-Iii. However, the date on which, respondents No. and 5 were regularly appointed as Peon, has not been disclosed n the petition. From a perusal of order dated 20.05.2008, it is cl ar that ail these persons were granted regular appointment prior to the petitioners. The petitioner has made representation on 26.4 2010 claiming promotion on the ground that persons appointed aft r him, were regularized and then promoted. Taking into consideration th nature of grievance involved in ‘ this petition, it would be open f r the respondent authorities to consider the grievance of the titioner and take appropriate decision on the same, in accordan e with law. With the aforesaid direction, he petition is tinaliy disposed of. Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge i e