IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14352 of 2004 Between: 1 Harijana Mathangi Anjinappa, S/o. M. Erikalappa, R/o. 7/216, Harijanwada, Gooty, Anantapur District. 2 Harijana Mathangi Anjanamma @ Ramanjanamma, D/o. Anjinappa, R/o. 7/216, Harijanwada, Gooty, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Joint Collector, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Gooty Mandal, Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, order or direction, declaring the section of the Respondents in seeking to evict the petitioners from the lands bearing Sy.No. 742-2 and 743-3 Acrs 4.59 cents and 4.45 cents situated at Gooty, Anantapur District as otherwise than in due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary without jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice by directing the 1st Respondents herein to consider the Review petitions of the petitioners and grant regular pattas to them. For the Petitioner: MR.R.RAMANJANEYULU, Advocate For the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court at the stage of admission made the following : ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue.. In spite of granting time, the petitioners failed to produce the orders passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur. Suffice it to say against the said orders, the petitioners filed a revision petition before the Joint Collector, Anantapur on 6-1-2003 and the same is pending. Having regard to the fact that third respondent dismissed the application for grant of pattas in favour of the petitioner, which was confirmed by Revenue Divisional Officer, against which, the petitioners preferred a revision, interest of justice will be met if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the revision filed by the petitioners against the orders passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur in D.Dis.No.D2/1900/98 dt. 31-10- 2002 within a time frame. Accordingly, the first respondent is hereby directed to dispose of the revision said to have been filed by the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order and communicate the result thereof to the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. ______________ A.GOPAL REDDY,J Dt. 25-10-2004 kmr To 1 The Joint Collector, Anantapur, Anantapur District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Gooty Mandal, Anantapur District. 4. 2CCs to the Govt., Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad(OUT) 5 2CD copies