IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE SECOND APPEAL NO.198 OF 2007 Kisan Vitthal Kakad and others .. Appellants v/s. Smt. Sonubai Vitthal Kakad .. Respondent Mr. S.M. Gorwadkar for the appellants. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 10TH JULY, 2007 P.C. Heard counsel for the appellants. 2. Whether the custom permitted divorce or not is essentially a question of fact and not purely a question of law. That argument, therefore, will be of no avail nor would raise any substantial question of law for consideration. Even the issue regarding admissibility of document exhibit 58 has been considered by two courts below, which again is the matter of appreciation of evidence. 3, There is no reason, therefore, to interfere in exercise of the second appeal. No substantial question of law arises for consideration. Dismissed. (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)