1 APP142/09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.142 OF 2009 M/s Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. ...Applicants v/s Dhobighat Compound Rahiwasi Seva Sangh and anr. ...Respondents WITH ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.143 OF 2009 M/s Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. ...Applicants v/s Om Dattaji Nagar Rahiwasi Seva Sangh and anr. ...Respondents Mr Rohit Kapadia, Sr. Counsel with Mr Virag Tulzapurkar, Sr. Counsel, Mr Rajeev Kumar, Mr 2 APP142/09 Bhaven Manek and Ms P. Shriti i/b M/s Wadia Ghandy and Co. for Applicants. Mr S.U. Kamdar, Sr. Counsel i/b Mr S.G. Surana for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.759 OF 2009 M/s Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. ...Petitioners v/s Dhobighat Compound Rahiwasi Seva Sangh and anr. ...Respondents WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.410 OF 2010 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.759 OF 2009 M/s Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. ...Petitioners v/s 3 APP142/09 Dhobighat Rahivasi Seva Sangh and anr. ...Respondents And M/s Om Omega Shelters ...Applicants WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.761 OF 2009 M/s Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd. ...Petitioners v/s Om Dattaji Nagar Rahivasi Seva Sangh and anr. ...Respondents Mr Rohit Kapadia, Sr. Counsel with Mr Virag Tulzapurkar, Sr. Counsel, Rajeev Kumar, Mr Bhaven Manek and Ms Pallavi Shriti i/b M/s Wadia Ghandy and Co. for Petitioners. Mr S.U. Kamdar, Sr. Counsel i/b Mr S.G. Surana for Respondent No.1. Mr A.Y. Bookwala, Sr. Counsel i/b Mr S.G. Surana for Respondent No.2. 4 APP142/09 Mr D.H. Mehta i/b Mr Umashankar Upadhyay for Applicants in Chamber Summons No.410 of 2010. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 18TH MARCH 2011. P.C. :- 1] All the four applications/petitions are permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to institute appropriate proceedings. The learned counsel appearing for Om Omega Shelters and Shivganesh Sahakari Grihanirman Sanstha and Shivsainath Sahakari Grihanirman Sanstha state that though the Societies have entered into agreements with Om Omega Shelters, nothing further is likely to be done by any of the parties at least for a period of two weeks from today because the parties have been referred to Slum Rehabilitation Authority and the proceedings before the said Authority have been adjourned for a period of two weeks. Statement is accepted. In view of this statement, there is no question of making any interim order in favour of the petitioners. If the petitioners want any 5 APP142/09 interim order, the petitioners will have to move either the Slum Rehabilitation Authority or adopt their remedy immediately. In view of this order, chamber summons No.410 of 2010 in arbitration petition No.759 of 2009 does not survive and the same is disposed off. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary of this Court. Certified copy expedited. ( JUSTICE D.K. DESHMUKH )