IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30625 of 2008 NARESH MISTRI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.8.2008 Heard. The case is under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The allegation is that the petitioner, who is husband of the complainant, was married to her 15 years back and was demanding Rs.10,000/- from her. The Court’s attention was drawn to one line of the statement in the petition of complaint so as to highlighting as to what could be the social and other conditions of the family that it could not be better than that of a labourer. The family could meet its end only when the petitioner was working or labouring for it. Regard being had to the years since marriage and status of the family and in that light considering the allegation, I direct that the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.1,000/- ( one thousand) only without any surety to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Nawada, in connection with complaint case no. 579 of 2004. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )