T—E ^1 IN THE mGH COUBT OF JUDICATURE. AT-BILASPURfC.G.) WWTPETITIONNQ^ 4'!3^- OF 2004 BETWEEN PETITIONER \e -c..1 ^ K^y ...••" ,<y,... <^w RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. M. L. KHAPARDE AGED-44YEARS, SON OF SHRI R. B. KHAPARDE SUB-ENGINEER (SUSPENDED) AT-O/o RURAL ENGDSTEERING SERVICE, DFVISION, RUDRI DISTRICT - DHAMTARI (C.G.) R/0 RAMPUR WARD, DHAMTARI DISTRICT- DHAMTARI (C.G.) STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH- THE SECRETARY PANCHAYAT & RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MANTRALAY, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR. 2^ THE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER CHHATTISGARH BEHIND LAW UNIVERSFTY, RAIPUR 3. CHffiFEXECUTrVEOFFICER, ZILA PANCHAYAT, DHAMTARI DISTRICT- DHAMTARI (C.G.) 4. EXECUTFVE ENGINEER, RURALENGINEERING SERVICES, DFVISION, RUDRI DISTMCT- DHAMTARI (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE- 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WMT W THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. SCTTABLE DKECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS 's^^^ss^ l^^^il^l ^^Ssi&vf^ '^•'SWi •>:lr HIGH COWKTW JUDICATURB caiHATTBBGARH: BBLABPOR 8iai^Ben<A: Hpn'I^SlMA^^ishK.Agn^^ W. P. N<>.4734o;r3Q04 Petitioner Respondents M. L. Khaparde Versus Stete bfC.G. &0thers lc^.A•A Shn MaiieesUiSllarma, <»unsel^thepetUioner. Sriit. Anju Alii^ Dcputy Gcweraui^^ &r ttie Stffte." : : -': . " -,; :.: ;:.--: ; : i • . ; - ' ;': OiRALGSaXEXt (5ttMay,2006» 1. I.A. No. 4559/2QW, appUcatk>n for withdrawal of the petition. 2. tt is stated fhat the grievances of the petitioner raised in fhis petition do not survive. Henc& this applieation is ordcred as px-ayed for, to whieh leamed counsel for the respoudcnts llas uo objectkni. ' 3. Consequenffy, the writ .petition stends dismissed ^ withdrawn. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri { Judge >