IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8250 of 2009 DR.SATISH PRASAD SON OF LATE RAM TRIVENI PRASAD, RESIDENT OF BHABHUA, P.S. BHABHUA, DISTRICT KAIMUR. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 08-05-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner containing the F.I.R. and the charge-sheet in Barachati P.S. Case No. 168 of 2008 from which it appears that the alleged victim lady, namely, Urmila Devi is also accused in a case under section 302 of the I.P.C. Let the supplementary affidavit be kept on record. The petitioner is accused in a case under sections 376/ 342 of the Indian Penal Code on the information given by the informant Rajendra Prasad Sah, A.S.I., Civil Lines P.S. stating that in the night of 30th November/ 1st December, 2008 the petitioner was apprehended with Urmila Devi. Urmila Devi told that she had shared the bed along with the petitioner. At that time media persons were also present. Submission is that Urmila Devi is in a habit of filing case and entire cases were managed by her. She has also filed a case under section 376 of the I.P.C. against - 2 - Madan Singh. In that case she has claimed her age as 40 year. That case was investigated and the police found the allegation to be false. Urmila Devi is herself an accused in a case under section 302 of the I.P.C.,as stated above. In that case charge sheet has been submitted against her. She was medically examined on next date in the present case but no sign of sexual intercourse was found upon her. At best she is a consenting party. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Gaya in Civil Line P.S. Case No. 323 of 2008. ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J ) BTiwary/