1 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1525 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri A.M. Kulkarni for the Petitioners. ­­ CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 4TH MARCH, 2010 P.C.: . On the basis of an application made by the Petitioners, a Court Commissioner was appointed. An application was made by the Petitioners raising objection to the report of the Court Commissioner and praying for a direction to do the commission work afresh. By the impugned order, the same has been rejected. 2. After having heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners, I find that no case for interference is made out in this Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Petitioners can always raise 2 an objection to the Court Commissioner’s report. Merely because one of the parties is not satisfied with the report of the Court Commissioner, there is no warrant for directing the Court Commissioner to re­do the commission work. Subject to what is observed above, the Writ Petition is rejected. (A.S.OKA, J)