1 84.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.84 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2578 OF 2010 Abdul Latif Ibrahim Mahaldar ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.R.D.Suryawanshi for Applicant. Mr.A.S.Gadkari, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.Rakesh Bhatkar for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- FEBRUARY 21, 2011. P.C. 1. Although explanation offered in the application is unacceptable, however, in the interest of justice, as the litigant should not suffer for the mistake of the Advocate, this Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), on condition that the Advocate on record shall pay cost quantified at Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand) to the High Court Legal Services Committee within one week from today, failing which, the earlier order passed on 21st January, 2011 in Writ Petition shall stand revived. 2 84.11 2. Subject to above, Writ Petition be listed on 9 th March, 2011 . (A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)