BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16434 of 2011 1. V.R. THULASIRAMAN 2. POTTI A.NAGARAJAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANTI-LAND GRABING CELL, RAMANATHAPURAM, RAMNAD DISTRICT. IN CR.NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.VELMURUGAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 120(b), 406, 467, 468 and 420 I.P.C. in Crime No. Not known of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that only petition enquiry is pending against the petitioners on the basis of the complaint preferred by one Harikrishnan. 3. However, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners were frequently called for interrogation by the respondent police and as such they are having apprehension of arrest. 4. It is seen that only petition enquiry is pending against the petitioners on the basis of the complaint preferred by one Harikrishnan. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are having apprehension of arrest as they have been called for interrogation by the respondent police frequently, this Court is constrained to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram on their executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, RAMANATHAPURAM. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANTI-LAND GRABING CELL, RAMANATHAPURAM , RAMNAD DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. R.VELMURUGAN Advocate SR.No.44441 SR : 20.12.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16434 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/