:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2124 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 2124 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 2124 OF 2006 United Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. ...Petitioner. V/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others. ... Respondents. Mr. G.V. Murty with J.R. Vakil for the Petitioner. Mr. D.. Mehta with Smt. A.R. Joshi for the B.M.C. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J. : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J. : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J. 16TH 16TH 16TH OCTOBER, 2006. OCTOBER, 2006. OCTOBER, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. At the hearing of the Petition, Counsel appearing on behalf of the Municipal Corporation has made a statement that the notice dated 14th July 2006 (Exhibit B) shall be withdrawn and that in the event, the Municipal Corporation seeks to alter the road line prescribed under the sanctioned revised development plan, steps shall be taken to do so strictly in accordance with law. The notice dated 14th July 2006 was sought to be challenged before the Court and the reliefs sought in prayer clauses (a) and (b) are directed against the validity of that notice. 2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Petition in view :2: of the statement made on behalf of the Municipal Corporation. The statement made on behalf of the Municipal Corporation is accepted. 3. In the circumstances, the Petition is disposed of as withdrawn at the request of the Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. -----