1 (SA517.2010 CAS 1357.10) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.517 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1357 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.517 OF 2010 Sandeep Dinkar Kadam and Others .... Appellants. v/s Shankar Manohar Kulkarni and others .... Respondents. Mr. R.A. Thorat with Mr. P.J. Thorat for the appellants. Mr. V.S. Talkute for Respondent No.1 to 3. CORAM: V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : 15th June, 2011 P.C.:- 1. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellants and the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of 2 (SA517.2010 CAS 1357.10) Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 submits that parties have settled the dispute. The learned Counsel for the Appellants submits that Respondent No.4 (deceased) and his legal representatives 4A to 4D are not the contesting Respondents. He submits that he may be permitted to delete the said Respondent Nos. 4 & 4A to 4D as party Respondents. 2. Leave is granted to delete Respondent No.4 and his legal representatives 4A to 4D at the risk of the appellants. 3. Parties have filed the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “X” for the purpose of identification. Appellants and Respondents are present in Court. The Consent terms are signed by Appellant Nos. 1 to 3 and Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and by their respective advocates. Decree is accordingly passed in terms of the Consent Terms. Undertaking given by the parties is accepted. 3 (SA517.2010 CAS 1357.10) 3. Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. Civil Application No.1357 of 2010 does not survive and it is accordingly disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)