IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 391 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3566 OF 2009. Hina Samrr Poddar ..... ..... ...Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra ..... ..... ...Respondent. Mr.Rajesh Singh, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, APP for the Respondent. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 6th August, 2009. PC: By the present application the complainant is seeking intervention with a view to address the Court in Criminal Application No.3566 of 2009 where in a prayer for anticipatory bail is made. Having regard to the nature of dispute application is allowed. Intervention permitted. Application is disposed of. 6.8.2009. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3566 OF 2009 Sameer Jagdish Poddar ..... ..... ...Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra ..... ..... ...Respondent. Mr.Rajesh Singh, Adv. for the applicant. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, APP for the Respondent. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 6th August, 2009. PC: The applicant is apprehending arrest in CR No.2203/09 for the offence punishable under sections 498A, 406, 504, 506, 323, 341 read with section 34 of IPC registered with Powai police station. The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail. The applicant was married to one Heena in the year 2007. The marriage happened to be love marriage performed according to Hindu Vedic rites. The complainant is the wife. According to the complainant after her marriage she was treated cruelly by the husband and her in laws on account of failure on the part of wife and her parents to meet the demands of the applicant. Offence came to be registered against the present applicant and his parents. Barring the applicant others have been granted anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that interim bail was granted by the Sessions Court and during that period applicant has attended the police station and his statement also came to be recorded. Submission is that during the pendency of anticipatory bail application before the Sessions court and thereafter the investigation has proceeded. The applicant has also throughout cooperated in investigation. It is also pointed out that no recovery is to be made from the applicant as 2 whatever articles were claimed to be belonging to the complainant have been seized under panchnama. Learned counsel for the applicant has also shown his readiness and willingness to cooperate in the investigation by submitting that the applicant would continue to attend the police station for a period of one week daily in between 7.00 to 9.00 p.m. and would also surrender before the appropriate court within a period of one week. A limited request is made to grant a week’s time to surrender before the Court. Having regard to the totality of facts and circumstances learned APP does not oppose grant of seven days time to surrender. Accepting the statement made by learned counsel I record that the applicant shall surrender before the court within seven days from today. 2. The applicant shall attend Powai police station between 7.00 p.m. To 9.00 p.m. And cooperate in the investigation for a period of one week. Learned APP on instructions from the IO makes a statement that the applicant will not be arrested for one week. Application stands disposed of. 3