IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M 28070 of 2010 Date of decision: 6.12.2010 Harvinder @ Bindu ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.PS Jammu, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Amandeep Singh, AAG, Haryana *** Ram Chand Gupta, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed by Harvinder @ Bindu under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 800 dated 6.12.2005 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC at Police Station City Sirsa, District Sirsa. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that accused-petitioner absented on one date of hearing on 13.7.2010 and however, he surrendered on the next date of hearing i.e. 27.8.2010 on his own and since then he has been continuing in custody. Further contends that earlier he had absented on 23.11.2006 and at that time he had surrendered just after one week on 29.11.2006 and he was released on bail by learned trial Court and thereafter, he had been continuously appearing before the learned trial Court for the last four years. Further contends that the trial is CRM No.M 28070 of 2010 -2- not likely to be concluded in near future as part evidence has been recorded so far. These facts have not been disputed by learned counsel for the State. Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant petition for regular bail filed on behalf of petitioner Harvinder @ Bindu is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Sirsa. December 6, 2010 (RAM CHAND GUPTA) gsv JUDGE