IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.47 of 2010 1. VIJAY KUMAR S/O SRI BHOLA PRASAD YADAV R/O VILL.- GIRIPATTI GRAMPANCHAYAT, P.O. & P.S. RAGHOPUR, DISTT.- SUPAUL Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DIRECTOR PRIMARY EDUCATION BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KOSHI DIVISION SAHARSA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SUPAUL 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SUPAUL 6. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER BIRPUR, SUPAUL 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, RAGHOPUR SUPAUL 8. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER CUM BLOCK RESOURCE CENTRAL CO-ORDINATOR, RAGHOPUR, DISTT.- SUPAUL 9. THE PRAKHAND PRAMUKH RAGHOPUR, SUPAUL 10. THE SECRETARY OF GRAM PANCHAYAT RAGHOPUR, SUPAUL 11. THE MUKHIYA GRAM PANCHAYAT RAGHOPUR, SUPAUL 12. MANOJ KUMAR MANOHAR S/O SRI SUBHALAL YADAV R/O GIRI PATTI, GRAM PANCHAYAT, P.O & P.S.- RAGHOPUR, DISTT.- SUPAUL ----------- 3 1.9.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner. The review application has been filed against the order dated 8.1.2010 passed in CWJC No. 13438 of 2009 on the ground that impugned order has been passed without considering the relevant guidelines for appointment of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra. The review petitioner’s case is that since he was holding the degree of B.A. (Hons.) , so the presumption will be that he obtained higher percentage of the marks and the marks of the writ petitioner who was simply a Graduate cannot be treated of equal percentage as the petitioner. I find that on perusal of the marks obtained by 2 the petitioner duly supported by the counter affidavit of the State that both petitioner and Vijay Kumar (Review petitioner) have equal percentage of marks. In that circumstance, as per guidelines weightage was given to such candidates. On consideration of the materials on record, I find that no new facts can be considered for reviewing the order passed in the writ application. The guidelines was duly considered and considering everything the order was passed. I do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed in the writ application. It is dismissed. Akumar ( Mridula Mishra, J.)