IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 4036 of 2011 Date of decision: 28.7.2011 Baldev Singh … Petitioner versus Mukand Singh … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. J.S.Bhandohal, Advocate, for the petitioner ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit for damages of Rs.10 lacs for causing harassment and mental agony on account of filing false complaints against him to the Vigilance Bureau Department by defendant Mukand Singh. He is aggrieved with order dated 28.3.2011 passed by the Civil Judge(Sr .Division), Fatehgarh Sahib, by dint of which his evidence has been closed by order of the Court. Hence, this revision. Heard. The suit is of the year 2005. Plaintiff tendered evidence of the witnesses in the year 2006-07. Thereafter, he and the witnesses never put themselves for cross-examination. The impugned order indicates that 13 effective opportunities had already been granted to the plaintiff for the said purpose including two last and final opportunities. The act and conduct of the present petitioner indicates of complete callousness. It amounts to dragging the defendant into litigation. There is no infirmity in the impugned order. No interference is called for. The revision petition is dismissed. July 28, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE