1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR J U D G M E N T S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.608 of 2010. The Managing Committee, Khandelwal Vaishya Mahila Vishwavidyalya VERSUS The Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Jaipur City, Jaipur & Others Date of Judgment :::: 18th January, 2010. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh Mr. Dharmendra Jain, Counsel for the Petitioner *** By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner- society runs a non-government educational institution and for this purpose received aid at the relevant time to the extent of 90% i.e. the period for which the petitioner has been held liable to pay the emoluments in accordance with the directions issued by the learned Tribunal. The prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that a direction by way of mandamus may be issued to the State to compensate the petitioner by paying the amount deposited by the petitioner in accordance with the 2 judgment of the learned Tribunal to the extent of 90%. In the facts and circumstances, since the prayer relates to a direction in the nature thereof, which may be allowed or issued under the writ of mandamus and since, the present writ petition being in the nature of certiorari against the order passed by the learned Civil Court in the execution proceedings, such a direction cannot be issued in the present writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw this petition and file an appropriate petition for the said relief before this Court. The liberty, as prayed for is allowed. This petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. The Registry is directed to return the origional documents, filed by the petitioner, after retaining the Photostat copies of the same on record. (Dalip Singh), J. Ashok/