Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr. MP(M) No.716 of 2008. Dated of Decision: July 17, 2008. Pawan Kumar. …..… Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. ………. Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. J.S. Guleria, Law Officer. Surinder Singh, J (oral): Pursuant to the last order, the petitioner was granted interim bail and had joined the investigation of this case only on 16.7.2008. During the interrogation, Rubber stamp in the name of B.P.E.O. Dharampur, has been taken into possession. In this case as such his custodial interrogation is not required. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest from the police, in FIR No.196/2008 dated 5.7.2008, registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code, in Police Station Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. Now it is ordered that in the event of his arrest, he be enlarged on bail subject to his furnishing the bail bonds to the tune of 2 Rs.20,000/- with one surety to the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. This bail shall be subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall make himself available for the purpose of interrogation in this case and shall also join the investigation as and when directed; and (b) The petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence and terrorize any of the prosecution witness in any manner, who is acquainted with the facts and circumstances of this case. The petitioner shall not commit the breach of any of the conditions aforesaid in any manner. If he does so, the liberty of bail shall be cancelled. Application stands disposed of. July 17, 2008. (Surinder Singh) (Pds) Judge.