1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1054/2009 (Sakharam Bhojaji Nadhe VERSUS Additional Collector, Akola & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.D. Chopde, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : APRIL 17, 2009. Heard Shri Chopde, the learned counsel for the petitioner. By this petition, the petitioner impugns the order passed by the Tahsildar Akola on 30.09.2008 under Section 49 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 as also the order passed by the Additional Collector, Akola on 28.11.2008 dismissing the revision application filed by the petitioner. Both the authorities have concurrently held that the respondent no.3 was the owner of the property in question and there was absolutely nothing on record to show that there was written or 2 oral consent of the respondent no.3 permitting the petitioner to lay the underground pipeline from his field. Both the parties considered the report of the Tahsildar, which he had prepared after visiting the spot in the presence of both the parties and also the report of the Circle Officer, which was called by the Tahsildar. The authorities rightly observed that there was no provision in Section 49 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code to regularize the illegal installation of the pipeline in another person's land. The orders passed by both the authorities are just and proper. The petition is devoid of merit and the same is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE