IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10876 of 2010 DEEPAK KUMAR @ SONU S/O Pradip Kumar, R/O Vill. Sikandrapur (Anupam Campus), P.S. Town, Distt. Muzaffarpur ……………………….Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR………………………….Opp. Party ----------- 3. 25.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 10.12.2009 in a case registered under Sections 25(1-B) A, 26/35 of the Arms Act. It is alleged that from the petitioner’s shop arms and ammunitions as well as jewellary were recovered. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the arms were recovered from a bag which was kept there by one Santosh and from F.I.R. itself it appears that on the basis of the statement of the petitioner, Santosh was arrested and subsequently on the statement of Santosh other arms were also recovered. It is further submitted that on the basis of the recovery two cases were lodged one the present one and other under Section 395 I.P.C. and apart from that there is no other case pending against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the state however submits that there is recovery of the arms from the shop of the petitioner. Considering the period of custody and the criminal 2 antecedent of the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail in connection with Brahmpura P.S. Case No. 166 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. Learned Trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if he fails to appear on three consecutive dates before the trial court or he gets involved in any such case or cases. Praveen (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)