-« HIGH COURT OF GHHAniSGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (Ct No. 4302 of2008 Petitioner Smt. Devanti Devi Wife of Late Chandra Bha! Rai, aged abput 39 years, resident of Katkona, Tahsit Baikunthpur, District Koriya (CG) Present Address C/o. Suresh Singh, Sushant Niketan, Post S.E.C. L P.S. Sarkanda, Rajeev Bihar Raj KishoreNagar, Bilajpur (CG). -M I ^.^. Responcients Versus 1. South Eastern Coaffieids Limited. fcrough the Chairman-cum-Managing Director,Seepat Road, Biiaspur (CG). 2. The Chief General Manager, S.E.C.L., Baikunthpur, District Koriya (GG). 3. The Sub Area Manager, S.E.C.L. katkona Cotltery, District Koriya (CG). 4. The Deputy Personnel Manager, S.E.C.L. Office of General Manager, Baikunthpur, District Koriya (CG). (Writ Petition under Articte 226 of the ConsUtution of India) SB: Hon'ble Mr. SaUsh K. Agnihotri, J. Prssent: Shri DevendraSjngh.counselforthepeljtioner. Shri H.B.Agrawal, Sr. Advocate witti Ms. Rinki Tamrakar, counsel for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passedon this 7th dayofAugust, 2008 With the consent of leamed counset appearing for the parties, the matter is heard finally. 2) Leamed counselappearing for the petitioner submtts that the husband <rf the petitioner nameiy Chandra Bhal Rai, who was a contractor working with the respondents - South Eastern Coalflelds Limited, dted on 11-8-2003 ieaving behind his wife (petitioner) andchitdrwi. Theaecounts of the husband of the petitioner with respondents coyld not be settled as he died sudderilyon 11-8-2003. On instroctions of the respondent authortties, the patitioner had BeiS; "50 obteined a succession certificate from the Court of Civil Judge, Class-1, Baikunthpur, District Koriya (Annexure P/2) and thereafter she made a representation to the respondent authorities on 27-2-2007 (Annexure P/3) annexing copy 6f the succession certificate. The same has not been decided as on date. The petitioner is in greatfinancial crisis. </ 3) Shri H.B. Agrawal, leamed Sr. Advocate with Ms. Rinki Tamrakar, appearing for the respondentesubmitsthatin the facts ofthecase,it is proper that the pstition may be disposed of with obser/ation that ttie pending representation bedecided, jnaccordancewithiawonitsownmerite,aseartyas possible, preferably withina period offourweeks from the date of receipt of a copyofthjsorder. 4) In view of the foregoing, leamed counset appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing survivesin thismatter. 5) The petition is accordingly disposed of with a directton to the respondents to decide the representation as stated above, !n accordance with law on its own merits, as early as possibfe, preferably within a period of feur wreeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge ...l!t-,l ^._ji: .i.d;"-"^-