IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7918 of 2006 Between: 1 K. Annapoornamma, W/o. Subba Raju, Akividu Mandal, W.G.District. 2 Edarapalli Sakuntala, W/o. Ramabhadra Raju, Akividu Mandal, W.G.District. 3 G. Viswanatha Raju, S/o. Venkatarama Raju, Dharmapuram Agraharam Village, Akividu Mandal, W.G.District. 4 G. Subba Raju, S/o. Venkatarama Raju, Akividu Mandal, W.G.District. 5 R. Janakamma, W/o. Late Narasimha Raju, Akividu Mandal, W.G.District. 6 Indukuri Jhansirani, W/o. Satish Raju, Akividu Mandal, W.G.District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Divisional Forest Officer, Eluru, W.G.District. 2 The District Collector, Eluru, W.G.District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Akividu Mandal, Akividu, W.G.District. 4 Nallamalai Foundation (Regd.No. 402/95), 1, Old Block, Samrat Complex, Saifabad, Hyderabad R4 is impleaded as per court order dt. 28-4-2006 in WPMP 11566 of 2006 .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue writ of mandamus, declaring that the pisciculture in the six ﬁsh tanks of the petitioners admeasuring an extent of Ac.49-31 cents in s.Nos. 234, 235-1, 236-4, 260-10, 196/2, 229/6, 232/1, 233/ 245/3, 192/4, 193/1, 193/2, 193/3, 193/4, 236-2, 261-1A and 227 of Dharmapuram Agraharam Village, Akividu Mandal, W.G.District is not contrary to the G.O.ms.No.120 dt. 04.10.1999 ( Environment, Forest, Science and Technology) and not contrary to the provisions of the Wild Life Prohibition Act, 1972 and declaring the action of the respondents in threatening to demolish the ﬁsh tanks of the petitioenrs is without jurisdiction, highly arbitrary, unjust, violative of principles of natural justice violativeof Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.RAMACHANDRA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR FORESTS The Court made the following : ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous. Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. __________ 06-08-2008 rkk