1 APPA.439-2011 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 439 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APEAL NO. 685 OF 2010 Mansoor Ali Khan Ahmed Khan & Anr. ...Applicants. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent. ----- Mr. M.M. Khokhawala, for the Applicants. Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State. ---- CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D. SALVI, JJ. JUNE 21, 2011. P.C. 1. We have heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant who prays for being released on bail during the pendency of Criminal Appeal No. 685 of 2010. 2. We have perused the oral depositions of PW-2 Jilani Vasi Haidu Mirza as well as the medical evidence. The prosecution examined in all sixteen witnesses and it’s case is based on the circumstantial evidence. The extra judicial confession made by accused no.1 to PW-2 has been relied upon by the Sessions Court in support of its order of conviction. 2 APPA.439-2011 3. We have given anxious consideration to the arguments advanced before us and we are satisfied that no case has been made out to suspend the order of sentence under Section 389 of Cr. P.C. 4. Hence, Criminal Application is rejected. (U.D. SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)