S.B. (ServiceMattert IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITIONfS) N0^02^1 /2Q11. PETITIONER: DevNarayan Sahu, son of Sonau Ram Sahu, aged about 51 years, working as Upper Division Teacher, Kumarjhar, Block Kasdole, Education District Baloda Bazar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. versus Resoondents A^fe^ ^<3€3^" >'i'^--^. ^^^y '^yy ^<^' ...••••" 1. ^Sf&te ofChhattisgarh, Through Secretary Education Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. District Education Officer, District Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh. 3. Block Mucation Officer, Kasdole, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Joint Du-ector, Accounts, Treasury and Pension, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PAKTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: 3. As inentionedin the Cause titfe. -"'' PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS; As inentioned in the Cause title. ^ PARTICULARS OF THE CAUSE/ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETITION IS MABE/ SUBJECT MATTBRINB^F. ).. ^ ^ XI-HC—78 sn^i w K-IM ^8n sn^r s*>*iiqi ^ST '^ww'f, 'avi\wfs, hvfwy, ^...M.f..^....l.c>.^.<?J.}.l 'qwir^nra?" ' '" -: - •'•'"'^ 200 sn^T'q^r (lic<t^«(<1Er) TOIRRflfeTSIT^I |SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra 16.6.2011 Shri K. P. Sahu, counse State/respondents, on advan<| CPf^[d*l1l +11+1CT1' ^^^ <R>t^.l< °S siRn sn^r Mohan Shrivastava. J.1 for the uetitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakixr, pty. Advocate General for fhe :e copy. Heard on adniission. Leamed counsel appea the petitioner is entitled to b 1-ing tbr fhe petitioner submits fhat bnefit of tivo advance increiaents on JWUER fSC) 59. It is turther submitted account of he having pas^ed B.T.I examination hefore his appointment at his own co^t. It is submitted fhat the issue involved m fhe present petlt^on is no longer res integra and the same has been finally decidejd by fhe Hon'ble Supreme Court in fhe case of Asha. Saxena v^. State of M.P. 80 Ors.. 2009 fhat ttiis Court has also taken a stmilar view in its orde|r dated 06-02-2009 passed in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. ^eamed counsel for the petitioner further draws attention of t9is Court to order dated 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal No. 12^ of 2009, wherein relying upon fhe judgnient of fhe Supreme (pourt in fhe CSLSC ot Asha Sasrena (supra) and fhe order passed No.87/2009, directions have |by this Court in anofher Writ Appeal been issued for consideratlon of the 1- :_1_tiBlii ^A. fi' y^-y "^•sa3^ XI-HC—78 '3^ •<<l<ll<yl<<, ®fl1'M<l6,fa|dl-LllJ,< 5£. HWW <h*<l<sb WI. 200 3^V 1RRT ('yfj'l^'T) 3n^r ^r R-fi* cW 3TI^T spllf^ Praffeen. TOIIW ^lftff 311^1 -& case for grant of two advance verification ofthe facts pleaded Leamed counsel for fhel the petitioner would also be coijisidered on fhe saine lines ^>l<lf<f<ftl 'RTR^Jf '^f fs^ 'ifpil-^K. ^ 3tRTH 3TT^?r increments as per ctrcular dated 21-09-1974 issued by the $tate of Madhya Pradesh, after in fhe petition. respondents submits (hat case of In view of fhe statem finally disposed ofi'wlfh a dire< to consider and decide the cla4n ofthe petitioner for graat oftwo advance mcreinents as per cirfsular dated 21-09-1974 issued by the State of Madhya Prades pleaded in fhe petition, within date ofreceipt ofcopy offhis 01 jh, after verification of the facts |a period of three monfhs from fhe ;nt made above, this petition is |;ti.on to the respondent aufhoritles •der. ^»^swi"ft"" ?AatAn^a e^' A: '•\..-