IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16153 of 2007 CHANDRAWATI DEVI, W/O SHRI BIRENDRA PRASAD SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-SARAYA, P.O. AND P.S.-GOH, DISTRICT-AURANGABAD. ……………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. BIHAR HINDU RELIGIOUS TRUST BOARD, VIDYAPATI MARG, PATNA THROUGH THE ADMINISTRATOR-CUM-SPECIAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 3. THE ADMINISTRATOR-CUM-EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BIHAR HINDU RELIGIOUS TRUST BOARD, VIDYAPATI MARG, PATNA. 4. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, GOH, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD. 5. SRI RAJENDRA SINGH, S/O LATE SURYADEO SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-SARAIYA (GOH), P.S.-GOH, DISTRICT-AURANGABAD. 6. SRI DHANANJAY SINGH, S/O SRI CHANDESHWAR SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-SARAIYA (GOH), P.S.-GOH, DISTRICT-AURANGABAD. 7. SRI RAM KRIPAL SINGH, S/O LATE RAM SANEHI SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-SARAIYA (GOH), P.S.-GOH, DISTRICT-AURANGABAD. 8. DR. SACHIDANAND SINGH, S/O LATE RAMESHWAR PRASAD SINGH. 9. SRI RAM SHEKHAR SINGH, S/O LATE RAMNANDAN SINGH. 10.SRI CHANDRA DIP SINGH, S/O LATE AWADH SINGH. 11.RAM ISHWAR SINGH, S/O LATE SHIVNANDAN SINGH. 12.JITENDRA YADAV, S/O SHRI BACHU YADAV. 13.LAKHAN RAM, S/O LATE RAMPATI RAM. 14.GOPAL RAVIDAS, S/O LATE KARIMAN DAS. ALL RESIDENTS FROM 8 TO 14 OF VILLAGE-SARAIYA (GOH), P.O. AND P.S.-GOH, DISTRICT-AURANGABAD. ……………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 7 21.07.2010 Learned counsel for the Board informs this Court that the Board under the Bihar Hindu Religious Trust Act is functioning and is already holding an enquiry under Section 28 of the Act to determine the nature of the trust. He also informs that the parties 2 have already appeared before the Board and are participating in the enquiry. In the circumstances, this Court does not find it expedient to keep the writ application pending. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of with a direction to the Board to complete the enquiry and pass orders as expeditiously as possible, but not later than six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. For six months the interim order dated 18.12.2007 passed by this Court shall continue. It is also made clear that the Board will not be swayed away with the earlier notification dated 22.11.2007 and this notification shall be subject to the final decision by the Board. When the case was taken up on 18.12.2007, learned counsel for the Board had informed the Court that the said notification dated 22.11.2007 was in the process of withdrawal by the Board itself. In view of this submission, the Board may consider passing orders in respect of the notification preferably within one month pending final enquiry in the matter. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)