IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH MARCH 2007 / 23RD PHALGUNA 1928 WP(C).No. 31624 of 2003(M) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ MAHILA KUMARI, HEAD CLERK, JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, KARUNAGAPPALLY,(UNDER SUSPENSION), RESIDING AT "SREE VISAKH, MULAMKADAKAM, THIRUMULLAVARAM P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.SREEDHARAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, VIGILANCE(A) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, KOLLAM UNIT, KOLLAM. 4. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MANOJKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 31624/2003 M APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE FIR NO. VC. 8/2002 OF THE VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU PENDING BEFORE THE COURT OF ENQUIRY COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL JUDGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM EXT.P2. COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE HOME SECRETATRY, GOVT. OF KERALA. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE GO RT NO. 236/2002/VIG. DT. 24/10/2002. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THEPASS BOOK ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER'S HUSBAND FROM THE SBI, KOLLAM BR. EXT.P5. COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P6. COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN OP NO. 35088/2002 DT. 13/12/2002 OF THIS COURT. EXT.P7. COPY OF THE ORDER NO. P002/RR/C 23530003 DT. 7/3/2003 OF THE AG (A&E), KERALA. EXT.P8. COPY OF THE ORDER NO. P.02/RR/G/23530003 DT. 7/3/2003 OF THE AG, (A&E), KERALA. True copy tga KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.31624 of 2003 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 14th March, 2007. J U D G M E N T Petitioner is aggrieved since pensionary benefits are not granted. Apparently the reason is the pendency of a vigilance case. In case the vigilance enquiry has not been concluded, there will be a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to conclude the same within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. Subject to the outcome of the enquiry, steps shall be taken to settle the benefits due to the petitioner within another one month. The writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- O.P.No. of 2002 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 14th March, 2007.