1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF OF OF MOTION NO.740 OF 2004 MOTION NO.740 OF 2004 MOTION NO.740 OF 2004 IN IN IN INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX TAX TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2118 of 2004 APPEAL (L) NO.2118 of 2004 APPEAL (L) NO.2118 of 2004 The The The Commissioner of Commissioner of Commissioner of Income Income Income Tax 4 Tax 4 Tax 4 ...... Applicant Applicant Applicant vs vs vs M/s M/s M/s Meghraj Stock Broking Pvt.Ltd .. Respondent Meghraj Stock Broking Pvt.Ltd .. Respondent Meghraj Stock Broking Pvt.Ltd .. Respondent Mr.R.Asokan, Mr.R.Asokan, Mr.R.Asokan, APP for Applicant APP for Applicant APP for Applicant None None None for Respondent for Respondent for Respondent CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, V.C.DAGA, V.C.DAGA, JJ JJ JJ DATE DATE DATE : : : 5th June, 2007 5th June, 2007 5th June, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1.1.1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. NOne Heard learned counsel for the appellant. NOne Heard learned counsel for the appellant. NOne appeared appeared appeared for the respondent though served. By this for the respondent though served. By this for the respondent though served. By this Notice Notice Notice of motion the appellant is seeking of motion the appellant is seeking of motion the appellant is seeking condonation condonation condonation of delay in filing the above appeal. of delay in filing the above appeal. of delay in filing the above appeal. Perused Perused Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit in the Notice of Motion and the affidavit in the Notice of Motion and the affidavit in support support support thereof. For the reasons stated therein thereof. For the reasons stated therein thereof. For the reasons stated therein sufficient sufficient sufficient cause is made out for condoning the cause is made out for condoning the cause is made out for condoning the delay delay delay in in in filing the above appeal. There is no case filing the above appeal. There is no case filing the above appeal. There is no case for for for inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part part part of the applicant. of the applicant. of the applicant. 2.2.2. Hence, Notice of motion is made absolute in Hence, Notice of motion is made absolute in Hence, Notice of motion is made absolute in terms terms terms of prayer clause (a). of prayer clause (a). of prayer clause (a). (V.C.Daga, (V.C.Daga, (V.C.Daga, J) J) J) (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J) J) J)