IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15101 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 24, 2010. Davinder Singh Gill @ Happy .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.G.S.Kaura, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the daughter of respondent No.6, which is said to have culminated into a decree of divorce also, has further led to allegations that the petitioner is being harassed by respondent Nos.6 & 7 through the police authorities. In this regard, the petitioner has already made a representation to the higher police authorities including the Director General of Police, Punjab, on 2.7.2010 (Annexure P-3) but there appears to be no response to the same. Since the matter involves several disputed questions of facts which cannot be gone into by this Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction and no opinion on the merits of the allegations so levelled need be expressed at this stage, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition C.W.P.No .15101 of 2010 2 with a direction to respondent Nos.3 & 4 to deal with the petitioner's aforesaid complaint and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 24, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE