IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINTIAL Criminal With Petition No. 223 of 2009 1. Smt. Savita Bisht w/o Umesh Bisht 2. Smt. Bhuwaneshwari Bisht W/o Puran Bisht ……….. Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …………. Respondents Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for the State. On due consideration of the submission of the learned counsel for the partiers; perusal of the contents of the FIR; perusal of the allegations the petitioners; perusal of the documents filed by parties; and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that it is not a fit case for grant of the reliefs sought by the petitions in the writ petition. I am refraining form commenting on the merits of the case lest may adversely affect the case of the petitioners at the trial, which is yet to start. The writ petition, therefore, is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. Stay application stands disposed of accordingly. However, keeping in view of the facts that two persons, who were arrested by the police, have been released on bail; the present petitioners are ladies; and in view of section 437 Cr. P.C., it is directed that if the petitioners surrender before the court concerned or they are arrested by the police and thereafter if their bail application are filed, their bail applications will be disposed of expeditiously, without waste of time. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) Dated: 02.04.2009 LSR