IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45066 of 2008 Chandradeo Singh, Son of late Sadafal Singh, Resident of Village Tendua Bijulia, PS Barun, District Aurangabad --- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Suresh Singh, Son of late Rajaram Singh. 3. Anil Singh, Son of Suresh Singh, All are resident of Village Khaira, PS Barun, District Aurangabad. 4. Jagdeo Singh, Son of late Bansropan Singh, Resident of Village Mallu Khaira, PS Barun, District Aurangabad. ---- Opposite Parties For the petitioner : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Dashrath Mehta, A.P.P. ----------- 2 3.8.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This application has been filed against the order dated 10.9.2008 by which the Court has confirmed the order passed in Trial No. 2314 of 2007 dated 20.6.2007. The petitioner before this Court is the complainant who alleges that on the day of marriage of his son, he realized that the bride has been changed and the girl was lame and unable to move. The Court below has considered the complaint petition and S.A. and come to the conclusion that the petitioner was not able to show that the settlement of marriage was made with some other girl. On the other hand, it has been noted by the Court below that the son of the complainant has been sent to jail in a case filed by the daughter-in-law alleging that there was a demand of dowry and, therefore, she has been ill-treated by the husband and his family members. It is also noted that the petitioner had not taken any step to get the marriage annulled. This Court comes to the conclusion that besides what has 2 been noted above, it may be clarified that knowing very well that the daughter-in-law would take steps by filing a case against the petitioner under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, this complaint case was instituted earlier. In the facts aforesaid, I find no grounds to interfere with the order impugned. This application is dismissed. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)