Civil Revision No. 5116 of 2009 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5116 of 2009 Date of Decision: 8.9.2009 Mohinder Singh ......Petitioner Versus Oriental Bank of Commerce .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Shri J.S. Suneta, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (Oral). The learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (for short `the Tribunal') vide order dated 14.8.2007, awarded a sum of Rs.70,000/- on account of damage to the truck, in a motor vehicular accident. The said amount was deposited in a Fixed Deposit. Subsequently, the petitioner has been permitted to withdraw a sum of Rs.25,000/- each on two occasions. Now, the petitioner has sought to withdraw the balance amount of Rs.29,947/-, which has been declined by the learned Tribunal vide order dated 27.3.2009, impugned in the present revision petition. Since the amount of compensation is on account of damage to the truck, it is not understandable as to how the same is not being paid to the petitioner. It is only in case of the compensation payable to the minors and Civil Revision No. 5116 of 2009 (2) the persons belonging to the weaker sections of the Society, the Courts are to watch the interests of such persons by ordering deposit of the compensation in the Fixed Deposit. Consequently, the impugned order passed by the learned Tribunal is set aside. The Tribunal is directed to release the balance amount of Rs.29,947/- to the petitioner. Allowed in the above terms. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 08-09-2009 ds