IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24359 of 2010 Birbal Sahani, S/o Rudal Sahani, R/o village Godhiya, P.S. Sikarganj (Chiraiya), District East Champaran…………………………………..………..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Bhagat Sahani @ Bagat Sahani, S/o late Sukhlal Sahani 3. Rawan Sahani, s/o Bhagat Sahani. 4. Pravesh Sahani, s/o Raja Sahani, All are resident of village Godhiya, P.S. Sikarganj (Chiraiya) District East Champaran, Motihari…………….Opposite parties. 4 10.11.2010 Heard the parties. The present petition has been filed for cancellation of bail granted to O.P. no.2 to 4 by an order dated 5.4.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 1458 of 2010 (Annexure-2). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after grant of bail, O.P. nos. 2 to 4 had threatened the petitioner and as such he had filed a petition before the police informing about such threat, but he has fairly conceded that neither any action was taken nor any report has been submitted by the police supporting the allegation levelled by the petitioner in the aforesaid petition. It is well settled that considerations for grant of bail and cancellation of the same are altogether different. There are different yardsticks for cancellation of bail granted to an accused, as has been laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Aslam Baba Lal Desai V State of Maharashtra AIR 1993 SC, 1. The petitioner does not satisfy the conditions laid down by the Supreme Court for cancellation of bail. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances and in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court, there is not merit in the present petition. It is accordingly dismissed. M.Rahman ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J )