. . ww 1o “Lab. t 3 Ea wQD om wwwv§w mwwg imbr L y Q wwQ. wwuocp.“ o a Er a ..n wHnEmv Wm Umwmwd! BPunvQ g.,5 .3. wwwmnwowwmn 23m E. m4 oo‘ymwHWEnPOJ o“ O OmhnL03mywPxNFLQ5okup $m Own,WSAN .Eisa‘g EIQIEEKII‘ as mww CSQO NWQH wauwwn 1H ,fvoa O XI~HC-22 WT!”W w@ma§g Légw 23— 12-2005 None for the petitioner, ”Shri. éanbir Singh Marhas, learned counsel for ’the rcspondents. Whsn the matter was called appeared for the petitioner and E ThEreafter, the matter was ag 2673005, none appeared 1 lepresentation was made dn b S.P,C, The matter is called for 1 . any representation made on behz Accordingly, the ' petition pfosecution. Priya ‘for healing on 21.6.2005, none LRC. was directed to be issued. ain called up for hearing, on or the petitioner e nor any :half of the petitioner, despite . maxing, none appeaied-nor was Llf of the petitioner. is dismissed for want of. Sdl— SATISH K. AGMHOTRI Judge [@éfaa