IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 17TH JUNE 2008 / 27TH JYAISHTA 1930 WP(C).No. 17001 of 2008(Y) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SHEEJA THOMAS, THAKADIYELPARAMBIL, CHANNANIKKAD, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.V.MANOJ KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.17001/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT DT. 26.7.2004. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 17001 OF 2008 Y =================== Dated this the 17th day of June, 2008 J U D G M E N T Non implementation of Ext.P1 common judgment rendered by the STAT in so far as it concerns the petitioner is complained of in this writ petition. Petitioner submits that though MVAA 603/03 was filed by her and that the same was also allowed by extension of the route upto Cherthala, the permit has not been issued so far. 2. Learned Government Pleader on the other hand submits that about 51 permits have been ordered to be granted by Ext.P1 and that in view of the large number of permits involved, there occurred some delay and it will be expeditiously implemented. 3. Fact remains that Ext.P1 judgment was issued as early as on 26th of July, 2004 and almost 4 years have already passed. In view of this, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the respondents shall implement Ext.P1 in so far as the petitioner is concerned, on an expeditious basis, at any rate within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp