Rai Chand vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. S.B.Cri.Misc. Petition No.1975/2007 Date of Order : 28.10.09 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RATHORE Mr.N.L.Joshi for the petitioner/s. Mr.A.R.Nikub , Public Prosecutor. The petitioner has preferred this cri.misc. petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 11.09.07 passed by the District & Sessions Judghe , Churu in cri. Rev.No.38/02 by which he affirmed the order dated 05.04.02 passed by the Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Churu in cri.Misc. Case No.09/2001 under section 145 and 146 Cr.P.C. by which he rejected the prayer of the petitioner to implead him in the said proceedings . The brief facts of the case are that respondent No.2 filed an application under section 145 (1) and 146 Cr.P.C. on 26.05.01 in the court of Sub-Divisionl Magistrate, Churu, and the same was allowed by the SDO, Churu vide order dated 05.04.02. The application filed by Rai Chand and Mayank Kumar for impleadment as a party has been rejected by the SDO, Churu and the order passed by the SDO, Churu has been assailed by the petitioner before the revision court and the same was dismissed and the order dated 05.04.02 was upheld. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the order dated 05.04.02, upheld by the Revisional court and same was not challenged, thus attained finality and further submits that one of the petitioner who was applicant in the matter has preferred criminal revision petition before this court and the same was registered as SB Cri. Revision Pet.No.297/2007 and the same was dismissed as having become infructuous. Having considered the submissions made by the leaned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for respondent and upon perusal of the order passed by the SDO, Churu and the order of the revisional court, this court finds no merit in the case , thus no interference whatsoever is required while exercising extra ordinary jurisdiction under section 482 Cr.P.C. Consequently this cri.mic. petition fails being devoid of merit and the same is hereby dismissed. (K.S.RATHORE) , J. l.george