IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44320 of 2008 DHIRAJ KUMAR SINGH @ MUNCHUN, Son of Ram Sringar Singh @ Ram Chandra Singh, Resident of Village- Barchaila, Police Station- Tankuppa, District- Gaya :---- Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR:------Opposite Party ----------- For the Petitioner :Mr. Ramashish, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwari, A.P.P. ==== 2. 27.11.2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 394, 395 and 397 of the Penal Code and Sections 3,4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act. He has been arrested in this case on the basis of confession recorded by the co-accused, whereafter he is also said to have made an extra judicial confession. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the extra judicial confession of the co-accused as also of the petitioner cannot be taken as a legal evidence. He may be right, but considering the antecedent of the petitioner, at this stage, I am not inclined to release him on bail when he is in jail custody since 14.08.2008. His prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected with liberty to renew prayer for bail in July, 2008. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)