IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13453 of 2009 MEENA DEVI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22.5.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of this application. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under sections 363 and 366A of the Penal Code lodged by one Mamta Kumari. It is alleged by the informant that one Sumit Kumar and his associate Babloo forcibly took her daughter away for the purpose of marrying and murdering her. It is further alleged that in this occurrence the entire family members of the petitioner were involved including his mother, her three children, three uncles namely Sita Ram Sah, Debu Sah and Madan Sah and both daughter of Sita Ram Sah, his wife and daughter-in-law. It is further alleged that the informant also received call on MobileNo.09905633413 on which she heard cry of her daughter. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the F.I.R. there is specific allegation against Sumit Kumar and Babloo of having forcibly taken the victim and thereafter there is an allegation that all the family members including the petitioner, her husband, her son and daughter and three uncles were involved in the conspiracy. He further submits that no one has seen the petitioner abducting the victim and the alleged Mobile number does not belong 2 KHAN to her. He further submits that the petitioner being a lady is in custody since 15.7.2008. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the petitioner has master minded the whole case and the prosecution side is receiving threatening every now and then. In case the informant is getting threatening, she can lodge a case or Sanha, as the case may be. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Meena Devi is directed to be released on bail in connection with S.T.No.1399 of 2007 arising out of Kadam Kuan P.S. Case No.167 of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge XI, Patna. (S.P.Singh,J)