^fi^i^; IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS.1 N0. ^fiS^ /2010 PETITIONER: "° A°h ~<€^^ y.^^ ^^y -•?<• .s- ..i<s° VERSUS ^i" RESPONDENTS >^~^ \. ^..~,^.^:, ^? ^ ^^¥?-a S^ &" I •^•"^^^1 •SSSfc.t 2. 3. 4.' 5.- 6. Bhojram. Verma S/o Shri Siya Ram Verma, Aged about 53 years, Occupation Peon, in the office of Senior Agriculture Development Office, Bhathapara, District Raipur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary Agriculture Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Director Agriculture Chhattisgarh Raipur Joint Director Agriculture Raipur (C.G. ) Deputy Director Agriculture Raipur (C.G. ) Shri Chadhottari Ram Sahu aged about 57 years, Occupation' Assistant Grade -III, Office of Dy. Director Agriculture Development Office, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Smt Padma Pawar, aged about 54 years, Occupation Assistant Grade -III, in the ofGce of Dy. Director Agriculture Development OfEce, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) . SAHU >SVOCATE -~r - WW^I fc WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA W*R1TaiW^i 'S^ "L||<<|<'1'4, ®ti1'H''i<o,fsiciiyy ^..\^e..^>. ...€w^^ 3TI^?TTRW (li°lf^»<S1ET) sn^i w R'li'* ^TT 3TT^T sn*rie?» t^nw ^ft? w^r ^iraf?raftrf iTTO?rf "£ffsT^ ^^^$R ^7 3Tfg*T 3T!^?T SB : HON'BI.E MR. JUSTICEPRITINKSR DIWAKER ^2.10.2010 Shri C.R.Sahu, counsel tortt\ Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, P.Lj Grievance of the petitioner presently he is working as peon in ^ entitled for his promotion to the pos| Contention of the counsel ft placed persons have aiready been ^iven the benefit of promotion but the petitioner has been denied tt\ submits that at this stage the withdraw this petition and directio| pending representation of the peti|tioner dated 23.11.06 (Annexure P/6). State counsel submits that e oetitioner. for the State. in the present pefition is that he Agriculture department and is :ofAG-UI. ir the petitioner is that similarly e same for no fault of his. He petitioner may be permifted to l may be issued for deciding the iet the petitioner make a fresh representation to the resp. No.3 an<( the same would be decided after considering ali the facts and circurr^stances ofthecase, in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petitioner | is permitted to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid Uberty. ^n the eventuality of making fresh representation by the petitioner to |the resp. N0.3 within a period of three weeks from the date of recfeipt of copy of this order, it is expected from the respondent expeditiously as possible preferabl; months from the date of its r^ceipt. It is made clear that this Coi|irt has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authotity concemed would be at liberty to decide the saroe strictly in accorc^ance with law, K0.3 to decide the same as [r witUn a further period of four Sd/- . .._ pritinker0^akar Jud&e iM.