1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR ORDER S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3473/2009 Kamlesh Mehta vs. State of Rajasthan Dated : 21.08.2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH BHAGWATI Mr. Madhav Mitra, for the petitioner. Mr. Vijay Yadav, for the complainant. Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor for the State. This order governs the disposal of bail application filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. by Mr. Madhav Mitra Advocate on behalf of the applicant Kamlesh Mehta pertaining to F.I.R. No. 35/2009 of police station Mahila Police Station, Ajmer in the offences under Sections 498-A and 406 of IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant as also the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has canvassed that he is being falsely implicated and is in no way connected with the commission of the offence of the instant case. He is innocent, hence, he may be granted indulgence of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant as also learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State have opposed the bail petition. 5. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and perused the relevant material available on record, I am of the firm view that 2 it is a fit case wherein petitioner can be granted anticipatory bail and the bail petition is ordered to be allowed. 6. Therefore, the SHO/I.O. Of the Police Station Mahila Police Station, Ajmer is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Kamlesh Mehta S/o. Sh. Jasraj Mehta in FIR No. 35/2009 registered in the offences under Sections 498-A and 406 of IPC, he shall enlarge him on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.500/- with a surety bond in the like amount, to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required: (ii)He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii)He shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (iv)He will not commit any offence during the period of bail. (MAHESH BHAGWATI), J. Mak/- s-34