IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.438 of 2009 UPENDRA PRASAD SINGH S/O LATE RAGHUNANDAN PRASAD SINGH ---PETITIONER Versus 1. RINA KUMARI W/O UPENDRA PRASAD SINGH 2. SONU @ MRIGENDRA PATEL --- OPP. PARTIES. ----------- 04 02.11.2010 Petitioner is the husband. He is aggrieved by order dated 20.10.2008 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nalanda at Biharsarif in Maintenance case no. 15(M) of 1993 whereby on a consideration of the materials brought on record by the parties it has been found that the petitioner has refused to maintain his wife and son. Having found so learned trial Court has directed for payment of maintenance at the rate of Rs. 500/- (Five hundred) each to the applicant/wife and his son. While assailing the judgment impugned, it is contended that the wife/applicant did not reside with the petitioner for a single day. It is next contended that she was living an adulterous life. It is found from paragraph no.7 of the impugned judgment that a compromise was arrived at between the parties whereafter she was allowed to come back to the matrimonial home and thereafter again she was forced to leave the matrimonial house. In view of the aforesaid facts recorded by learned trial Court as also considering the meager quantum of maintenance granted by learned Court below, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order. The application is dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)