IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 21229 of 1994 Between: 1 A.Kesava Reddy, S/o. obi Reddy, R/o. Veerapallipet, Hamlet of Patnam, Kadiri (M), Ananthapur Dist. 2 A.Salamma, W/o. Obi Reddy, R/o. Veerapallipet, Hamlet of Patnam, Kadiri (M), Ananthapur Dist. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Joint Collector, Ananthapur Dist, Ananthapur. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Penukonda, Ananthapur Dist. 3 The Mandal Refenue Officer, Kadiri, Ananthapur Dist. 4 Vadde Tamutaka Venkatanna, S/o. Sathyanna, R/o. Veerepailipeta (V), hamlet of Patnam, Kadiri (M), Ananthapur Dist. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring that the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Rc.No.A47283/94 dt.6-8-94 relating to the assignment of lands in Sy.Nos.18-5 and 18-6 of Village Veerepallipet, hamlet of Patnam, Kadiri (M), Ananthapur Dist, are arbitrary and illegal and direct the respondents to act in accordance with law and not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in respect of the said lands. For the Petitioner: MR.V.VENKATARAMANA , Advocate. For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: G.P FOR REVENUE. For the Respondent No.4: None: The Court made the following order: The petitioners filed this writ petition aggrieved against the proceedings, dated 6.8.1994, which is only an interlocutory one, pending the substantial revision on the file of the District Collector, Ananthapur. This Court has already granted interim directions in W.P.M.P.No.26318 of 1994, dated 02.12.1994. Having regard to the same, it is not necessary to go into the merits of the case, especially when the substantial revision is pending. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. It shall be open to the respondent No.1 to dispose of the main revision on merits after giving notice and opportunity to the petitioners, if not already disposed of. However, it is needless to mention that the interim orders granted by this Court shall remain in force till disposal of the revision. No costs. ___________ 1st July, 2004 sj Copy to: 1. The Joint Collector, Ananthapur District, Ananthapur. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Penukonda, Ananthapur District. 3. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kadiri, Ananthapur District. 4. Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court Building, Hyderabad. (OUT) 5. Two C.D. copies.