IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6073 of 2010 MUNNA @ MUNNA MIAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 15.4.2011 For completing the cross-examination of the Investigating Officer and thereafter for further completing the remaining proceedings in Sessions Trial No. 714 of 2008, the trial court has sought extension of the period fixed by this Court for concluding the trial by six months. It appears from the report at Flag ‘A’ that several letters have been written by the court for production of the Investigating Officer. It has been repeatedly held by this Court that writing letters is never appreciated by this Court and it is its duty to draw up an order, send a copy thereof to the concerned Superintendent of Police and in case of non- compliance issue show cause to him for making a reference to this Court for initiating a contempt action. This Court does not understand as to how the courts are writing letter instead of issuing show cause for non-compliance of the orders. Let the Superintendent of Police, Motihari, be directed to ensure appearance of S.I. Kamakhya Narain Singh who was examined in part in Sessions Trial No. 714 of 2008 within a fortnight of the receipt of the present order with a report to this Court about the compliance of the order whereafter the court below shall ensure disposal of the above noted Sessions Trial in three months time with a report to this Court. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)