1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1496 of 2009 Shivkripa Builders & Development ...Petitioner v/s. Slum Rehabilitation Authority & 4 ors. ...Respondents Shri Y.S. Jahagirdar a/w. V.M. Parshurami & A.S.Gaikwad for the petitioner. Shri D.A.Nalawade, GP for SRA. Atul Rajdhyaksha a/w. C.N. Gole for respondent no.3. CORAM:- SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED:- September 01, 2009. P.C. There is no dispute to the effect that Slum Rehabilitation Authority had issued show-cause notice to the Petitioner which is at page-92 of the paper-book to which Petitioner has already submitted a reply. Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submitted that in terms of Section 13 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 the Chief Executive Officer has no jurisdiction to pass an order in regard to change or otherwise of the developer engaged by the Society. It is also contended that because of the Court order, the work would not be carried out by the Petitioner. 2. We see no reason as to why this cannot be brought to the notice of the authority which has issued the show-cause notice. The authority should 2 consider both the aspects pointed out by the Petitioner and pass appropriate order expeditiously. 3. If the order passed is adverse to the Petitioner, the same will not be implemented for a period of two weeks from the date of service thereof. Petition is disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE A.M.KHANWILKAR, J