IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.368 of 2010 SURESH PRASAD YADAV,SON OF LATE NANDU YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BISFI DIH, P.S. BISFI DISTRICT MADHUBANI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, DARBHANGA 5. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, DARBHANGA. 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADHUBANI. 7. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BENIPATTI, MADHUBANI. 8. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, BISFI POLICE STATION, MADHUBANI 9. THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER, BISFI POLICE STATION, MADHUBANI. ----------- 2 03.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Advocate General No.4 for the state. The prayer of the petitioner is that the charge sheeted accused persons of Bisfi P.S Case No. 170/07 registered for the offence under Section 302, 201/34 Of the Indian Penal Code are not being arrested. Mr. J.P. Karn learned Additional Advocate General No. 4 appearing for the State submits that the appropriate steps ought to have been taken in the court below as provided under the different provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. This writ application is accordingly dismissed. Amrendra/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)