IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4636 of 2005 Ratan Kumar Kedia Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 3 21.07.2011 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However learned counsel for the State is present. By filing this writ application the petitioner seeks renewal of his license from 2000 to 2005. Learned counsel for the State submits that a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State and a categorical statement has been made in paragraph no. 4 that the Arms License 2/81-82 in Form – IXB of the petitioner has been renewed for the year 1999 to 2006 by the order dated 14.12.2005 passed by the District Magistrate, Gopalganj. Thereafter it has also been renewed up to 2009. No rejoinder by the petitioner has been filed to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State, though it appears that a copy of the counter affidavit has been served upon learned counsel for the petitioner on 28.2.2009. It appears that the grievance of the 2 petitioner has already been redressed and he has lost interest of the case as the license of the arms stands renewed up to 2009 itself. Accordingly, this writ application is disposed of. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)