- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.69 OF 2007 IN CRI.APPEAL NO. 442 OF 2006 Shankarlal Gupta and Ors. ..Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mr.Ganesh Gole Advocate for Applicants Mrs.A.S.Pai APP for State ... CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : JULY 20, 2007 DATE : JULY 20, 2007 DATE : JULY 20, 2007 P.C. [PER SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] : P.C. [PER SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] : P.C. [PER SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] : 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant has been convicted under Section 302 of IPC. The role attributed to the applicant is that he has assaulted deceased with knife. There are four eye witnesses who implicate the applicant i.e. P.W.2 Suresh Foujdar Yadav, P.W.3 - 2 - Laltaprasad Sukhram Yadav, P.W.4 Changez Jamal Multani and P.W.17 Sahebraj Foujdar Yadav. Looking to this fact, we do not think that this is a fit case to grant bail. 3. Application is rejected. Hearing expedited. [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]