IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40636 of 2009 RAJESH BIND @ BAM BIND Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 2/12/2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner with reference to the condition No. (a) in the order dated 9.10.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 34812 of 2009 would submit that the court below has interpreted the concept of close family member by confining it father, mother, brother or sister, but as the petitioner’s brother, father, mother and sister are already accused, the petitioner has not been released on bail. He, however, would submit that the petitioner is ready to furnish the surety of his own brother-in-law (Bahnoi). Considering the peculiar feature of this case, his Court would clarify that the order dated 9.10.2009 to also mean that the petitioner could be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of his own bahnoi (brother-in-law) who is of course close family member. Let this order be sent by fax at the cost deposited by the petitioner. Abhay Kumar (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)