IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Application No. 401 of 2008 Pehal Singh Rathi …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and another …… Respondents …….. Mr. T.A.Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S.Sandhu, Government Advocate for the State. Hon’ble V.K. GUPTA, C. J. Mr. T.A.Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S.Sandhu, Government Advocate for the State. 2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate, I am fully convinced that no interference by this Court in exercise of the jurisdiction U/s 482 Cr.P.C. is warranted. 3. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (V. K. Gupta, C. J.) 25.06.2008 A