IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.55484 of 2007 RAGHUNANDAN SINGH @ RAGHUNANDAN PRASAD SINGH & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 2/5/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a police case under Sections-364/34 of I.P.C. The daughter of petitioner No.1 was married to the son of the informant. Their marriage having fallen foul, a prosecution under Section 498A of I.P.C. was instituted in which cognizance has been taken against the informant and others. It is submitted that in this background when the husband of the informant has allegedly gone missing, with which the petitioners have no concern, they have been falsely implicated. Counsel for the State, from the materials in the case diary, did not point out anything with regard to the involvement of the petitioners in the husband of the informant going missing except suspicion. The petitioner No.2 is the son of petitioner No.1 while petitioner No.3 is a relative of petitioner No.1. In the entirety of the facts and circumstances let the petitioners Raghunandan Singh @ Raghunandan Prasad Singh, Sunil Singh and Subash Singh Surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail during the period of investigation till submission of charge sheet upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the - 2 - satisfaction of C.J.M., Saran at Chapra in Issuapur P.S. Case No.59/07, subject to the conditions laid down under Section- 438(2) of Cr.P.C. In the event that charge sheet is submitted against them, they shall be required to surrender and seek regular bail. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )