IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGAIIH, AT BASP Writ E'etition g3) No. zgof 2G38 Bijay Chandra Bay, S/o Shri Ram Lal Bay, aged about 5O years, working as Training Officer GTade-H ITI Dondilohra, Distt. Duyg {CG}. VER$US R LS ONDENTS Z 1. State of Chhattisgarh, ’Ehrough itS Sacretaxy Man Power and Planning Department, DKS Bhawam Raipur (CG), Directoy, Employmant and iraining, Wamen Polytachnic Campus, Byran Bazar, Raipur (CG). (WRIT PETITION INDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITI WON OF INDIA) B: Htm‘ble Mr. Swish. K. A 'hat L‘ Present : Sh1i PS. Koshy with Shxi Vinod Deshmukh, Advocates for the Shi'i Alok Bakhshi, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents. a} “a go petitioner. ORAL GRDER (Passetl on 18m day 0f June, 2%8) ‘Nith the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing fmaliy. 1. Learned. counsel appearing for me petitioner submits that the petitioner was‘ initiail‘J aPPointed as Junior lustitletor ‘Nelder\z on the PaY scale . of Rs. 740f— for the period of 89 days on adhoe basis, by order dated 02.04.1987, and joined at I.T.I. Gidain, Distt. Bastar on 14.04.1987. _( {- Thereafter, the petitioner continuously worked tillr2’5.01.1991 i.e. the date of his regulaiization on the same post. On 25.01.1991 the petitioner was appointed on regular pay scale of Rs. 1400—404440-50- 2340/— on the post of Junior Instructor/Assn. Training OEicer. After completion of two years of probation period, the services of the petitioner was t'egulaiized. 7 The similarly situated employees have appioaehed the State Administrative Tiibunal (for short 'SAT') in Original Application No. i l y H ILUR S ri. .a , ' g6 JI‘ 1979 of 1991 (Satish Kumar Maradloi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anather) pyaying for similar relief as sought for in this petition. Learned counsel appeaxing foz' the petitiooer submits that this case may also be disposed of in the same tenns and condition. . Shri Alok Bakhshi, Ieamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that file case of the petitiooer would be considered in the light of the order of the SAT as aforestated, aher verifying the facts of the GaSe. . In View of the foregoiiig and categorical statement made by the learned counsel appeaiiiig for the State, this petition is allowed in the same tenns i.e., if the Committee finds him suitable for the post in all respects, he shall be regularized on the post held by him and shall also pay him salaiy on regular scale. He shall be entitled to salary for the dates on break in service. His seniority shall be counted from the date of his initial appointment. 5 Sd/- i i Satish K. Agnihotri l l . Judge “54#,