IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2011 / 20TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26946 of 2011(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHAJILAL KUMARI S., COOK, PRE-METRIC HOSTEL, NJARANEELI, ELANCHIYAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF SCHEDULED TRIBES, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.R.RENJITH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 26946 of 2011(P) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION REGARDING PASSING TEST ISSUED BY KPSC. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE GRADATION LIST OF LAST GRADE SERVANT. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 22-4-2009. EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE SUSPENSION ORDER DATED 15-11-2010. EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 5-1-2010. EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25-6-2011. EXHIBIT P7: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 2-7-2011. EXHIBIT P8: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 1-9-2011 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P9: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE ab K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ----------------------------------- W.P(c)No. 26946 of 2011 --------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner, who is working as Cook in the Pre-metric Hostel, Njaraneeli, complains that she has not been considered for the next promotion as Attender. According to the petitioner, she was included in the gradation list of qualified Last Grade Servants for such promotion as evident from Ext.P2. However, overlooking her seniority, her juniors have already been promoted. In the meanwhile, she had been suspended on the ground that she was absent from duty when there was an inspection. She was subsequently reinstated. The petitioner has submitted Ext.P8 representation before the first respondent setting out her grievances. She complains that no orders have been passed thereon till date. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. Since Ext.P8 is pending before the first respondent, it is sufficient that this Writ Petition is disposed of directing consideration of the same. W.P(c)No. 26946 of 2011 2 4. This Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the grievance of the petitioner set out in Ext.P8 representation in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. sd/- K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE /True copy/ P.A.to Judge ln