IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 6505 of 1999 Between: G.Durgaiah, S/o. Yellaiah, O/o. A.A.O., E.R.O(Rural), A.P.Transco, Karimnagar. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The A.P. Transco .Ltd., rep.by it's Director (Member-Secretary), Vidyutsoudha, Kairatabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintending Engineer. A.P.Transco. Ltd., Karimnagar. 3 S.Mallaiah, A.P.Transco. Ltd., O/o. ERO, Rural, Karimnagar. 4 B.Yadi Reddy, A.P.Transco. Ltd., O/o. ERO, Peddapally, Karimnagar. 5 M.Papa Rao, A.P.Transco. Ltd., O/o. ERO, Metpally, Karimnagar. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction especially on in the nature of a Writ of Certiorai to call for the records relating to and connected with the Memo.No. SE.OP.KNR,ESST.DNo.890/99 dt.17-3- 1999 and Memo.No. SE.OP.KNR,ESTT.D.No.891/99 dt.17.3.1999 of the 2nd respondent and quash or set aside the order or reversion of the petitioner and consequential order of promotion of Respondent 3 to 5 with all consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.KISHORE RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: P.R.BALARAMI REDDY(SC FOR AP TRANSCO) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 6505 OF 1999 ORDER: Since none appeared for the petitioner on 26.3.2008, the writ petition was directed to be posted “for dismissal”. Today though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither is the counsel for the petitioner present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as costs. _______________________________ Date: 09.04.2008 RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J MRKR To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{MSKM}