IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9044 of 2008 AJIT KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 13.5.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected taking into account that the alleged kidnapped boy had not yet been traced. By order dated 24.3.2008 a report regarding stage of trial was called for which has been received. From the report it appears that four prosecution witnesses have been examined. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that deliberately the trial is being delayed and after framing of charge, only four witnesses have been examined. From the impugned order it appears that the alleged victim boy has not yet been recovered. I see no reason to differ with the earlier order rejecting the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is again rejected. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J. )