IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2197 of 2000 SANTOSH CHANDRA JHA Versus RAJESH KUMAR SINGH & ANR with Cr.Misc. No.4212 of 2000 MANOJ KUMAR SARAF Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR with Cr.Misc. No.4187 of 2000 MANOJ KUMAR SARAF Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 5. 29.6.2010. Heard. The three petitions arise out of one Complaint Petition No.782(C)of 1999. The three petitioners in the three petitions have been summoned to stand their trial under Sections 406, 420 and 120B of the IPC and 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act with some other accused persons. I have gone through the complaint petition and I find nothing except that they are named in the complaint petition. There is no act or role assigned to any of the three petitioners. As regards the whole allegations of cheating, defrauding or issuing cheques which could bounce later on while sent for collecting the amount to a bank, the roles are definitely assigned to accused persons other than the three petitioners and keeping that in mind the prosecution of the three petitioners through the above complaint petition and the above order of 2 summoning appears a complete abuse of process of the court. The three petitions succeed as against the three petitioners and is hereby allowed by the summoning order as regards the three petitioners. Stay granted earlier is vacated. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)