ca0% ?‘’ BEFORE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF ' CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C G ) WP(C)Ngh7\ k k /2010 Ud i V Smt Chltrarekha Kurre W/o Shnimen Kurra Aged ab0u%_:years 14! R/O v Vlllage Rahya Gram Panchayat Rahya Block & Tahs11~Mastur1 Dlstrlct Bllaspur (C G) PETITIONER :— VERSUS EPONDENTS :- / 1.Smt. Papita Bhargav W/oShri Bhagwa Charan Bhargav aged abogt 34 years R/o Village Raliya,Gram Panchayat Raliya, Block & Tahsil—Masturi District—Bilaspur (C’G.). x 2.Krishna Bai lahare W/o Ramadhar Lahare ; (u 3. Chameli Bai KurTe W/o Kaval Prasad Kurerre ‘ /4. Chhedin Bai Patre W/o Rajkumar Patre ; ’5. Poonam Sande'W/o Ramesh Sande ; 6. Meenav Lahare W/o Hirendra ‘Lahare ; x7. Yasoda W/o Baldev; 8. Rupa Bai Banjare W/o Mahesh Banjare; x 9. Rev-ati bai Tomar W/o Dilip Tomar ; /10. Saraswati bai Patre W/o Dasarath Patre ; / / 11. Returning Officer (Panchayat ) Village Raliya,Gram 'Panchayat Raliya,Block & Tahsll—Masturi- District-Bilaspur (C.G.). r - 12. Authorized Cffwer (Panchayat) Booth No.1 18 Village Raliya,Gram Panchayat 'Raliya,Blocl< & Tahsil-Masturi District— Bilaspur (C.G.). ' § _ . RS n / / g 3. Authorized Offlcer (Panchayat )Booth No.1 19 Village Raliya,Gram Panchayat Raliya,Block & Tahsil-Masturi District— Bilaspur (C.G.). (I 14‘ Authorized Offlcer (Panchayat )Booth No.1 19(A) Village Raliya,Gram Panchayat Raliya,Block & Tahsil— Masturi District- Bilaspur (CG). /l 5‘ Gram Panchayat Raliya,Thr0ugh the secretary. Gram Panchayat Raliya Block & Tahsil—Masturi District- Bilaspur (C.G.). / l6. Sub—Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bilaspur ,District Bilaspur (C.G.). Writ Petition Under Article 226/227 0f the Constitution of India l. Particulars 0f the Petitioner :— @ W m HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION 1C1 NO.6474 OF 2010 PETITIONER Smt. Chitrarekha Kurre Versus RESPONDENTS Smt. Papita Bhargav & Others (Writ Petition under Atticle 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Suresh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Prateek Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL! (Passed on this 19‘ day of November, 2010) 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of thisCourt to withdraw this petition. 2)’ No objection from other side. 3) It is ordered, as prayed for. 4) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn./""i i Sdl— . Satish K. Agnihom v Judge ,/ ’iSowri