1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4468 OF 1994 Sharadkumar S/o Shahurao Bowar .... PETITIONER V E R S U S State of Maharashtra & Oths. .... RESPONDENTS Mrs. S.D.Tambat, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.G.Patil, Assistant Govt. Pleader for State. Mr. U.B.Bondar, Advocate for respondent no. 5. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE: 22/07/2010 ORAL ORDER : 1. The learned Assistant Govt. Pleader points out to us that the petitioner has retired in the year 1974, whereas the petitioner is claiming benefits on the basis of the Rules, which came to be framed in the year 1983. The petitioner would be governed by the conditions of service, which were existing either at the time of his appointment or at the time of superannuation and not by the Rules which have come into effect subsequently. 2. In that view of the matter, no merit is found in the petition. The petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. 2 3. In view of dismissal of Writ Petition, nothing survives in the Civil Application. As such, Civil Application is disposed off. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA ] [ B.R. GAVAI ] JUDGE JUDGE knp/WP 4468.94