1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3235 OF 2009 Waman S/o Mariba Hatangale ... Petitioner. Versus The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad Parbhani & Others. ... Respondents. -------- With Writ Petition No.3236 Of 2009 Kashinath s/o Gyandeo Thombre ... Petitioner. Versus The Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad, Parbhani And Others. ... Respondents. -------- Shri. A.S. Shelke, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri. R.T. Nagargoje, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 2. -------- CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & K.U. CHANDIWAL,JJ. DATE: 16th DECEMBER 2009 2 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no sooner the petitioners got exemption from appearance in the Departmental Examination the same exemption has to be considered in respect of placing them in the seniority list. In other words, the counsel submits that the petitioners will have to be shown senior to the other employees who got exemption in later point of time than the petitioners. 3) The learned counsel appearing for the Zilla Parishad submits that the seniority list is one and the same and it cannot be tinkered with even if the petitioners get exemption from appearance and passing the Departmental extermination. It was further submitted that getting exemption by the petitioners would not change their place in the basic seniority list maintained by the Department. 3 4) Prima facie we are not convinced with the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they should be shown senior to the persons who were exempted in later point of time than the petitioners for the purpose of absorption. 5) In exercise of extra ordinary writ jurisdiction no interference called for. The Writ Petitions are disposed of. (K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ wp.3235.09