IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI TUESDAY, THE 12TH OCTOBER 2010 / 20TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 30935 of 2010(N) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- REMYA.M.K. W/O. SALEESH, SREEBHADRALAYAM, KALAVAMCODE.P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA, NOW RESIDING AT MAHESH BHAVAN, MUDAVOOR MUVATTUPUZHA ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN SMT.R.S.SREEVIDYA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688001. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHERTHALA POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. PIN-688001. 3. RAJU, S/O. KARUNAKARAN, PUTHENPURAYIL VEEDU, KALAVAMCODE.P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688A506. 4. KANNAN, S/O. KARUNAKARAN, PUTHENPURAYIL VEEDU, KALAVAMCODE.P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688506. ADV. SRI.V.K.PEERMOHAMED KHAN FOR R3 & 4 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPIN DAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN WPC NO.26354 OF 2010 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY ISSUED BY THE KVM HOSPITAL, CHERTHALA. EXT.P2: A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 28/9/2010. // True Copy// PA to Judge K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. * * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.C.No.30935 of 2010 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of October 2010 J U D G M E N T K.M.JOSEPH,J The petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following relief: i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or diection compelling and commanding the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to give adequate and effective police protection to the life of the petitioner and her husband from the respondent Nos.3 and 4 and their henchmen. 2. Briefly put, the case of the petitioner is as follows: The petitioner's husband was an inmate in the Santhigiri Madom. He gave up his ascetic life and returned to homely life by marrying the petitioner. The party respondents 3 and 4 were the kudikidappukars in the property of the petitioner's father-in- law who gave ten cents to them as kudikidappu. Now the petitioner is having only 7.28 Ares of land. Respondents 3 and 4 were threatening the petitioner for selling the property. As the petitioner and her husband refused, they assaulted the petitioner and her husband. He underwent treatment. Respondents 3 and 4 continuing to threaten the petitioner and her husband. W.P.C.No.30935 of 2010 2 3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for respondents 3 and 4. Adv.Sri.V.K.Peer Mohammed Khan, the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent submits that he will enter appearance for the 4th respondent also, who is the brother of the 3rd respondent. He submits that petitioner's husband assaulted the 3rd respondent and a crime has also been registered. But he submits that respondents 3 and 4 have no intention to threaten the petitioner, as alleged. 4. We record the said submission and direct that in case the petitioner brings any threat from respondents 3 and 4 to the notice of the 2nd respondent, the 2nd respondent will look into it and if the threat is found to be genuine, the 2nd respondent will afford protection to the life of the petitioner and her husband from respondents 3 and 4. 5. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge W.P.C.No.30935 of 2010 3 W.P.C.No.30935 of 2010 4 W.P.C.No.30935 of 2010 5 K.M.JOSEPH & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. .No. of 200 ORDER/JUDGMENT 30/082010