^P^cr^^ S'NGL£B£WCH '^^- IN THE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0..^^r^..../2010 PETITIONER ^^ ^>-/"'.^/^^>"" ^^^ ( ^)^ ^y ^^;'/' ^ ^^ RESPONDENTS ,-'^wis^^ /y^""^^ 's^ .,. f ^M..MM^^ 1 B s: Daltan Prasad Banjare Son of late Jhadu Ram Banjare, aged about 32 years, at present working as a Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, Govt. Higher Secondary School Jamgaon (M), Block Patan, District Durg, R/o Village Bhathagaon, Post Batang, Tahsil Patan, District Durg VERSUS A. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through -the Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 3. District Education Officer, Durg, DistrictDurg (C.G.) 4. The Collector, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Patan, District - Durg WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA. t i I. [ XI-HC—78 ^n^r^T'f^NT ^^T W^T $h^ich WSfdT^RT^ B~^r ^ii^Kn^, ^Ti1^4Ko', i^cni^^< ^....^..Q1^.:.U^..^^ .<. ^n^T '^{'oF (^3^?) IT?HW ^if^T ^TI^T SB: Hon'ble SSirl Maniadra MoBiaa Shrivastava, J 6.8.2010 Mr. R,S.Patel, counselfojr Mr. Viaod Tekain, Paael Ljawyer Heard. The petitiouer has filed ward of Head Master, who appUcation for compassionate apponitaient on the post of St submitted that he is entitled accordiiig to fh.e poUcy, Leamed State counsel petitioner may be given aa representation before fhe cocaLpt be considered on its own inerits, IJIllS died lllik <3n Haviag considered aiid ments of fhe case, ni fhe opini^r served, if a direction is given representation raisiiig his griev^ authority along wifh a copy of weeks froin today, aad on competent respondent aufhorit^ merits, ia accordaace wifh law, cb8^id41Ti 'W^ff ^ ft^ 'd^?R i73t^[ 'STI^T r fhe petitioner, for tlie State, on advaace copy. petition on the ground that he is whUe ia ser^ice. He nioved aii apponitinent aad he has been given Iksha Kanni Grade III, The petitioner D be appoiated as Assistaat Teacher iubmitted tiiat for the present, tlie opportunity of filmg the detaUed tent respondent aufhority, which may in. accordaiice witih. law, 1 jifhout expresstag any opiaion on tlie of tiiis Court, ends ofjustice w1U be |to fhe petitioner to inake a detailed ^aces before fhe coiapeteut respondent pie petition aiid this order, within. si?c luch representation bemg filed, the shall decide fhe same on its own is early as possible, preferably withia a -I- .^^-^ f^\ £^^^ ^ ^ f ^-•"XI-HC—78 w^i ^T Rviich "^qr -3-n^r sfi^ic^ Praveen ^«TT^l<4l<r)Al, yTi1<-i<i<o, f®t<rll<!-fy NS*l<ffl- ^HT^l •^200 3T1^T1[?^^' (li°<t^<^l) ^c?TW^ft<T 3T^T -z' period of four monfhs from fhe aay grievan.ee stiU remains, f available under fhe law, [late of receipt of the representation. If |ie petitioner may avail tlie remedy Witli tbe aforesaid observ^tion, this petition stands disposed off. Certified copy as per niles ^F?ft?Rt;T ^m^ff ^* 'fet3t 'd^i^K '^'3ti^7 ^n^i Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^