IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42063 of 2009 1. KAMLESH CHAUHAN 2. DHANRAJ CHAUHAN ---------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 25.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that a duly registered sale deed has been challenged by making false allegation that informant’s husband was taken by petitioners and forced to execute the deed after providing wine or some intoxicating substance which in no case can be taken for refusal of anticipatory bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in Itarhi P.S.Case No. 57 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)