IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 25548 of 1998 Between: Annapureddy Yedukondalu, S/o. Venkatappaiah, Satana Palli , Guntur. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P.Electricity Board, Rep.by its Chairman A.P.S.E.B., Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent Engineer, (Operation) A.P.S.E.B., Guntur Circle, Guntur. 3 The Asst. Engineer (Operation) Sattenapalli Section A.P.S.E.B., Sattenapalli, Guntur Dist. 4 The Municipal Commissioner, Rep.by its Commissioner, Sattenapalli Municipality, Sattenapalli, Guntur Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or Writs More in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 3 in not providing electricity to our street and failure to give domestic service Connections to our residential Houses even after Collecting the necessary and require amount from 4th Respondent as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and cannot be justified in the eye of law and Consequently direct the respondents to give extension of service wire and provide street lights and domestic service connections to the inmates of our locality in Ward No. 8 of Sattenapalli Municipality, Sattenapally, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CH.SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: MR.K.N.JWALA The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) The learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the petition has become infructuous. In the circumstances, the petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous with no order as to costs. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 17th June, 2009 ks