CWP No. 9105 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 9105 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: May 04, 2011 Jeet Singh .........PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab and others ........ RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA Present: Mr. S.S. Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. G.S. Attariwala, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. D.D. Bansal, Advocate, for respondents no. 2 to 6. AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL) 1. In this petition, prayer is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing order Annexure P-4 dated 15.06.2007 passed by Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Talwandi Sabo, Annexure P-2 dated 18.03.2009 passed by Commissioner, Faridkot Division, Faridkot and order Annexure P-1 dated 08.04.2010 passed by Financial Commissioner (Appeals-I), Punjab. The issue relates to sanction of mutation. 2. The facts need not even be mentioned in so much as it is the admitted fact that respondents no. 2 to 6 filed Civil Suit No. 82 on 12.04.2007 wherein, relevant issues for decision of this Court read as under:- “1A. Whether Ram Rakha Singh had executed a Will dated 13.10.2003 in favor of defendants No. 1 and 2? OPP-1. CWP No. 9105 of 2010 2 2. Whether Will dated 13.10.2003 is forged and fabricated document? OPP.” 3. The two issues have been decided in favour of the plaintiffs (private respondents in this writ petition) while holding that suspicious circumstances surrounding the Will could not be dispelled by the beneficiaries under the Will. 4. The impugned orders have been passed in context of sanction of mutation in accordance with provisions in the Will dated 13.10.2003. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners has not been able to dispute the law that revenue entries have to be made in accordance with decision rendered by a Civil Court having competent jurisdiction. 6. In view of the decision in regard to the Will, as mentioned above, no interference in extra ordinary writ jurisdiction is called for. 7. Petition dismissed. 04.05.2011 (AJAI LAMBA) shivani JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?