IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 18TH OCTOBER 2010 / 26TH ASWINA 1932 OP STAT.No. 256 of 2010(O) -------------------------- MVARP.310/2009 of S.T.A.TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM .................... PETITIONER:- -------------------- SHAHUL HAMMED, S/O.BEERAN, VADAKETHIL HOUSE, PALACHIRAMAD P.O., VIA KOTTAKKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM - 676505. 2. SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM - 676505. 3. STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM - 682016. BY SR.G.P.SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH THIS OP (STA) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ---------------------------- O.P.(STA)No.256 of 2010 ---------------------------- Dated 18th October, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is an existing stage carriage operator operating on the route Thrissur - Kozhikode with stage carriage bearing registration No. KL 10S 1008. The petitioner has submitted an application for variation of permit before the second respondent. However, the first respondent has rejected the said request. Thereupon, the said order was taken up in revision before the third respondent as MVARP.No.310 of 2009. The grievance of the petitioner is that on account of the delay on the part of the second respondent to make available the required documents before the third respondent, the consideration of the revision petition is being delayed. It is further submitted that the third respondent has already issued directions to the second respondent to produce the required documents. However, the second respondent is not making available such documents. It is in the said circumstances that this original petition has been filed. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader. 3. The learned Government Pleader submits that all the required documents for the purpose of appropriate consideration of OP(STA)No.256/2010 2 MVARP.No.310 of 2009 will be produced before the third respondent within a period of two weeks. This is recorded. Accordingly, this original petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to produce all the required documents and details for the purpose of deciding MVARP.No.310 of 2009 before the third respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS