THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No:1202 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner filed W.P.No.12236 of 2008 questioning the proceedings dated 6.03.2007 issued by the second respondent in relation to disciplinary proceedings. The writ petition was allowed through order, dated 19.06.2008. It was directed that the petitioner shall be entitled for continuity of service, but without back wages. A minor penalty of stoppage of one increment for a period of one year without cumulative effect was imposed. This Contempt case is filed alleging that the benefits, as directed by this Court in the writ petition, were not extended to her. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. It is no doubt true that there was some delay on the part of the respondents in giving effect to the orders of this Court. Today, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents placed before this Court a copy of the order dated 19.02.2009 through which the concerned benefits were extended to the petitioner. Hence the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ (L. Narasimha Reddy, J.) 5th October, 2009 Js.