IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22357 of 2009 1. INDRADEO YADAV 2. MISHRI YADAV 3. BHUSAN YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 18.11.2009 Heard counsel for the parties.. Petitioner nos. 2 and 3 now require consideration for grant of bail in view of the order dated 20.8.2009. It appears that the present petitioners were armed with rod and Garansa. The allegation is that a host of the accused persons including the petitioners surrounded the deceased and assaulted indiscriminately which ultimately caused his death after 18 days. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is counter version also in the shape of Ariari p.s.case no.151 of 2008 (Anneure-2). The present deceased as well as the informant are accuseds. It is next contended that these petitioners are in custody since 07.01.2009. It is further submitted that admittedly there is land dispute between the parties and proceeding under section 144 Cr.PC was pending. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and the informant opposed the prayer. It is submitted that co-accused Shugul Yadav has already been refused bail by this Court. It is next contended that the post-mortem report does indicate as many as three injuries caused by hard and blunt substance on the head of the deceased. - 2 - Considering the materials available on record, this Court, for the present, is not inclined to admit the petitioners to bail. Their prayer for bail is accordingly rejected. However, looking to the broad aspects of the matter, this Court grants the petitioners liberty to renew their prayer for bail after seven months. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )