-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. 1. WRIT PETITION NO.3444 OF 2006 2. WRIT PETITION NO.3445 OF 2006 Shri Sampat Shivram Sanas, .. Petitioner Vs Shri Mahadev Shankar Jagdale, and ors Respondents Mr K.V.Saste, for the petitioner. Mr Pradeep Shingate, i/b Mr Dilip Bodke, for the respondents. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 25.09.2006 DATE : 25.09.2006 DATE : 25.09.2006 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. These petitions are directed against the concurrent findings recorded by the courts below and, in view thereof, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order in writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Mr Saste, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly stated that I need not record reasons for dismissing the petitions and the petitioner would be satisfied if directions are given to the trial Court to dispose of the suits within timeframe uninfluenced by the observations made in the impugned order. In the circumstances, I pass the following order. (i) These writ petitions are dismissed on merits. The trial Court shall decide the suits as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period -2- of one year from the date of receipt of this order on merits in accordance with law and without being influenced by the observations made in the impugned order. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.)