8Ssg£!"'<Si \3^./ &si^S^^'' w \d-oq '<)l«lrt<j,y-rfl'H^ld, f2|ril^y'< ^^^^....^...W.M^^^200 3Ti^?T traq? (^fg^) siitOTwR'fi* aaiTan^sTWiTO ?TBTW^fttT3]A?r W.P. (S Petitioner Dbs about Ram Aged Grade-1 Divisioi Bhotfaal Dham.tAri 111 Respondeats Versus 1. State Throug|h Depart^nent Raipur| 2. The Depart(nent Raipur 3. The Departtnent 4. The Ex No.2, (CG) Writ Petitxon under Article S.B. Hon'ble Shri DUrendra Mishra. J 28.11.2008 Mr. B.P. Rao, counsel for| Mrs. Siuita Ghai, Paael V Heard. IPiqlcxSll lltwV^' f^><3 •(Rll't^K ^aif^Hsn^ST .6662 ^f 2008 Sahu, S/o Shri BisaU Ram. Sahu, 59 years, Employed as Assistant III, O/o Executive Eugiaeer, MRP, Dani No.2, Rudri, Residiag at : Village (BaUyari) T&hsil and District if Chhattisgarh, The Secretary, Water Resources D.K.S. Bbawan, Mantralaya, -492001 (CG) ingineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Sfliawa Bbawan, Civil Lines, 492001 (CG) ^hief Engiaeer, Water Resources nent, Mahanadi Project, Raipur (CG) scutive Eugineer, M.R.P. Dam Division ^Vater Resources Departanent, Rudri, 26/227 oftheCoasUtuUon oflndla fhe petitioncr. iwyer for fhe Statc. r ^^•ssi^ ^'^^.-r^t, 9 -w^^ '^Si^^ ^r^ T«i«i«<i,y-ifl'H^id, Rrii<Hy<< *fl41«l^TT^ 3TI^5T qa^ (ijcjfjd^) ^200 an^STtRi R'li'tb aaiT3II^?[fb*licb ^ ?RlTOT^rit(T3nt?l -2- <hl<l[ri41^ *<14dT^'fei<3 <R|+(I< ^sri^iTsn^sT With fhe consent of ^eamed counsel appeanng for the parties, petition is heard fii Leamed counsel appes|ring for the petitioner subiaits that for the present the petition|er may be given an opportunity of filing the detailed representaftion before the competent authority, to which leamed counsel objection. Havlng considered an<3\ the merits of fhe case, in appearing for the State has no wifhout expressmg any opinion on ;fae opinion of this Court, ends of justice will be served if lib^rty is granted to ttie petitioner to make a detailed representat competent aufhority of fhe j and on such representation of fhe respondents may de^ ion raising his grievances before the espondents along with a copy of fhe petition and this order, withfin a period of one month fi-om today accordance wifh law, as e^irty as possible preferably withiii a period of three monfhs representation. With the aibresaid obs being filed, fhe competent authority [;ide the same on its own merits, in from the date of receipt of fhe a'vation, flie petition is disposed of. Judge 1 ^1 sni;* III1 IIJtiB'