/ s HK3H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl N0.5755 OF 2007 PETITIONER/ DEFENDANT N0.1 RESPONDENTS/ PLAINTIFFS Shri Bhuvanlal Dheemar, S/o Shri Dayaram Dheemar, aged about 66 years, R/o Gam Padklpan, Tahsil & Dlstt. Mahasamund (CG). Versus 1 a. Leeladhar, S/o Shri Bhuwineshwar, aged about 26 years. 1 b. ChitraleWia, D/o Bhuvaneshvrar, aged about 21 years. 1 c. Ku. Kalyani, D/o Bhuwineshwsir, aged about 12 yeara. 1d. Ku. Nandini, Dto BhuTOneshMar, afled about 10 years. 1 e. Maniklal, S/o Bhuvaneshwar. aged about 8 years. 1 f. Ku. Madhu, D/o Bhuwineshwar, aged about 6 years. 1 g. Ku. Geeta. D/o Bhuvaneshwar, aged about 4 yeara. 1 h. Smt. Pachawati, Widow of Shri Bhuvaneshwar, mother & natural guardian of respondents No.1 c to 1 g beign minors, R/o Belsonda, Tah. & Didrict Mahasamund (CG). 2. Smt. Kaushalya, W/o Gendlal Uieemar. aged about 51 yeare, R/o Kumharpara, Mahasamund, Tehsil and District Mahasamund (CG). 3. Smt. Sushila, W/o Kejuram Dheemar, aged about 48 years, R/o Borsi, Tehsil Rajim, EMstrict Dhamtari, CG. 4. Smt. Chandrika toi, vridow of Uttar Kumar Dheemar, aged about 41 years, R/o Achhola, Near Tumgaon, Tehsil and District Mahasamund (CG). 5. Smt. Shanta Bai, W/o Dayalu Dheemar, agsd about 38 yeare, R/o village Sivni, Near Nara, Tehsll and Dlstrict Raipur (CG). 6. Smt. Shakuntala Bai, W/o Narayan Dheemar, aged about 35 years, R/o village Pacharipaar, Kurud, Tehsll Kurud, Djstrid Dhamtari (CG). ^ ^ 'i St £•A ^ RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTS 7. Smt. Saraswati, W/o KshaKk Cfe^mar, aged about 32 years, R/o village Hatda, near Maath Kharora, Tehsil and Dfetrict Raipur (CG). 8. Smt. Mungeshiya Bai, widow of Dayaram Dheemar, aged about 50 yeare, R/o Belsonda, Dlstrict Mahasamund (CG). 9. LataBai, D/o DayarainDheemar, aged about 21 years, R/o Beteonda, District Mahasamund (CG). 10. Bheekhamlal, S/o Dayaram [Mwemar, aged about 19 years, R/o Belsonda, District Mahasamund (CG). 11. State of Chhattisgarh, throi^lh C^ladior, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (CG). (Writpetition under ArBcle 227 of the ConsUtuUon of India) Single Bench: Hon'bte ShnSatish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Saurabh Sharma, counset for the petBioner. Shri Awadh TripaUii. counsel fbr the r^pondents No. 1 to 7. Shri Arvind Dubey.Panel Lawyerforthe Stato. ORDER (Passed on this 27'"day ofJanuary,200S) IA.No.5 This is an applicationfiled bythe respondents No.1 to 7 for yrgent hearingofthecase. 2) Shri Tripathi, team^d counsel appQ8ring jon behalf of the respondente No.1 to 7 submils thatthe mainsuit i.e. civil suit No.7-A/2(X)3 pendingin the Court of 3rd Civil Judge Class-1, Mahasamund, has already been disposed of on 30-4-2008. Thus, the writ peUtiQnchallenging the interim orders dated 21-9-2006 & 20-7-2(X)7 has become infructuous. 3) In view of the above submission made by learned counsel aniearing for the respondents No.1 to 7, according to leamed counsel appsaring for the petitfoner nothing remains In this petition for adjydication. 4) Accordingly, thewrit petition stands disposed of. 5) Consequently,allthependingappBcatiQnsslan(jdj,sposedof. Govwi Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge