WP(C) 3231/2007 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Barbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. Goswami, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4. Also heard Mrs. V.L. Sinha, learned State counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.3 and 5 . The petitioners by the present petition has challenged the Bakijai proce eding being Bakijai Case No.06/2005 initiated at the instance of the respondent Housing Board and also the notice dated 23.05.2007 issued by the Certificate Off icer asking the petitioners to show-cause as to why the warrant to attachment of movable property should not be issued. The petitioners are yet to submit the show-cause reply. The petitioners though appeared before the Certificate Officer and obtained time for filing the show-cause, they instead of filing the show-cause have approached this Court cha llenging the notice. In view of the above, the relief claimed in the writ petition filed by t he petitioners could not be granted. The petitioners may, if so advised, file th e show-cause pursuant to the notices issued and if they are still aggrieved by t he order that may be passed, they may prefer appeal before the Appellate Authori ty as provided under Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act, 1913. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No cost.