IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ( S ) No |^0 Of 2010 PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS: ^ -%•' Deo Narayan Patel S/o Shri Dev Kumar Patel, aged about 66 years, Retired Executive Engineer (Gen), C.S.E.B., R/o ViUage Sapos, Via Chandrpur, Tahsil Dayira, District Jahjgir Champa (C^r). Versus 1. Chhattisgeirh State Electricity Board , through its Secretary , C.S.E.B., having its office at Dajiganiya, Raipur (CG). 2. The Managing Director, CSPHCL^Raipur (CG). ^OJ^W^^A 3. Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board, A body constituted under the provisions of Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, having its office at Shakti Bhawan, Rampur , Jabalpur (MP). 4. The Additional Secretary, M.P. State Electricity Board, Shakti Bhawan, Rampur, Jabalpur (MP). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA —78 3T?^T "^T'f^NT TT8H 3TT^?T sb^i<^ Ui ^sa> Deepti ^^f <^NKy1'Z{, ytQ'H^Ko, f®tdl^l|,< . ^<P.^)^.\o2f|2^^ *11*1CTI ^ifl^ y -^200 ^^\ TPRT (^??35f^) ^rmw^fe? a^r SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Sl 07-04-2010 Shri Kamal Kishore Patel, counsj Heard. This petition has been filed b^ inaction on the part of respondents fs| representation dated 5/01/2010 (Anne^ including pension and retiral benefits. Learned counsel for the communication dated 4/09/09 (Annex^ upon reonganization, Chhattisgarh responsible for payment of pension the petitioner had approached the Hy order was passed on 5/07f2007 issi| Considering the facte and circt| respondent No.2, the Managing D\\ representation has been addressed| petitioner's representation. This from the date of receipt of a copy ofthi| take recourse to remedy available t4 remains unredressed. With the aforesaid observation, i^l for the petitioner. the petitioner aggrieved on account of |o.1 and 2 in not considering petitioner's jure P-2) in the matter of various benefits peti^ioner State anU issi|ing exerdise <+)1^4lTi 'm^lf ^* test Tf^$R ^3tRFT3TT^T rivastava.J. draws attention of this Court to |re A-1) wherein it has been stated that Electricity Board has been made other benefits .of the petitioner. Eartier, |h Court of Madhya Pradesh wherein an direction to pass necessary orders. Imstances of the case, it is directed that t-ector, CSPHCL, Raipur to whom the shall consider and take decision on |ise should be completed within 3 months order. It witl be open for the petitioner to him under law. in case, his grievance :he petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge