IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH: HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No.17883 OF 2011 BETWEEN: Majeed Ahmad Baig S/o. Gulam Ahmad Baig …. Petitioner AND The Deputy Inspector General, CISF, South Zone, Chennai and another …. Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No.17883 OF 2011 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in not forwarding the representation, dated 18-06-2011, of the petitioner to the 1st respondent to retain him in the present station for further period of 9 months as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to continue him in the present station i.e. CISF Unit, BHEL, Ramachandrapuram, Hyderabad. 2. The brief facts that are necessary for disposal of the present writ petition may be stated as follows: The petitioner is working as Constable (GD), Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) Unit, BHEL, Hyderabad i.e. under the control of the 2nd respondent since 25-11-2008. The 2nd respondent initiated disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner and imposed penalty vide final order, dated 09-03-2010, against which the petitioner filed W.P. No.12801 of 2011 and the same is pending. While so, the petitioner was informed by the Inspector (Execution) that the 2nd respondent is taking steps to transfer the petitioner to a far away place. Hence, the petitioner made a representation to the 1st respondent through the 2nd respondent requesting to withhold the transfer for a period of 9 months. But, the 2nd respondent is not forwarding the same to the 1st respondent. Hence, the present writ petition. 3. Heard. 4. The transfer order of the petitioner has not been effected so far. Therefore, the question of forwarding the representation of the petitioner by the 2nd respondent to the 1st respondent does not arise. 5. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner to make a representation when the transfer order is effected, and thereafter the 2nd respondent shall forward the same to the 1st respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________ K.C. BHANU, J June 28, 2011. KTL