IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 1491 of 2011 Suresh Pal Singh ...Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and another …Respondents. Present : Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. Lok, Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. The petitioner, who is a government employee, has been terminated from service after the disciplinary proceedings. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 15.10.2011 by which his services have been terminated. In view of the Division Bench judgment of this Court, namely, Bhuvan Chandra Pandey and others Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others reported in 2006 (2) U.D., 439, the matter first go to the State Public Services Tribunal where entire facts have to be reapprised. Therefore, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy as the petitioners have an equal efficacious remedy to file a claim petition before the State Public Services Tribunal, which is presently functioning at Dehradun in the State of Uttarakhand. 3. The writ petition is therefore dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. 4. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 8.11.2011 Kuldeep