R.A No.26 CII of 2006(O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.M No.9048 CII of 2008 and R.A No.26 CII of 2006 in I.T.A No. 32 of 2001 Date of decision : September 01, 2008 Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak ...... Appellant through Mr.Munish Jolly, Advocate v. Sh. Sunil Kumar Goel, ...... Respondent through Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J C.M.No.9048 CII of 2006 For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 60 days in filing the Review Application is condoned. C.M stands disposed of. R.A No.26 CII of 2006 This is an application for reviewing the order dated 19.1.2005 whereby this Court had set aside the non-speaking order dated 2.1.1998 passed by the Tribunal and remanded the case back to it for a fresh adjudication. The only ground which has been urged before us, is that certain points were not brought to the notice of this Court at the time of hearing of R.A No.26 CII of 2006(O&M) ::2:: the appeal. In our opinion, this is not a sufficient ground for reviewing the order, the parameters of which are based on an error apparent on the face of the record. Consequently, the review application is dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE ( ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ) JUDGE September 01, 2008 'kk'