THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.14936 of 2007 Dated: 16-07-2007 Between: Voruganti Ravinder Reddy. ..... PETITIONER AND The District Collector, Karimnagar, and others. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.14936 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioner is allegedly ex-serviceman, who was assigned land admeasuring Acs.5.11 in survey No.556 situated at Nustulapur Village, Thimmapur Mandal, Karimnagar District, vide patta C.No.B/146/93 dated 28.02.1993. Third respondent initiated action for resumption of the land for public purpose. Accordingly notice No.B/590/2007 dated 30.05.2007 was issued to the petitioner calling upon him to show-cause as to why the assignment should not be cancelled and the land be resumed for public purpose. The petitioner then submitted explanation on 21.06.2007. He alleges that the enquiry is still pending and that third respondent has not so far passed any orders. In the meanwhile third respondent is allegedly making attempts to dispossess the petitioner. Hence, instant writ petition is filed, inter alia, seeking a direction to the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner pending enquiry before third respondent. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignment), this Court is convinced that the writ petition is filed on mere apprehension. Admittedly after receiving notice dated 30.05.2007, the petitioner submitted explanation on 21.06.2007. If the petitioner’s contention that in spite of the fact that the enquiry is pending, third respondent is trying to evict him is correct, third respondent would not have issued any notice. Issue of notice pursuant to which the petitioner submitted explanation itself would belie any such contention. The petitioner may approach third respondent and request to pass appropriate orders immediately. The writ petition is misconceived and the same is accordingly dismissed. ___________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 16th July, 2007 ghn