( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION USJ SECOND APPEAL NO.699 OF 2002 SECOND APPEAL NO.699 OF 2002 SECOND APPEAL NO.699 OF 2002 Sandeep Anand Pathare ..Appellant V/s. Ramkrishna Balwant Raut & Ors. ..Respondents ...... Ms.Gauri Godse for the appellant Mr.C.G. Gavnekar for respondent Nos.2,3 and 4. Ms.M.M. Deshmukh, AGP for respondent Nos.6A to 6C ...... CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 16th April, 2009 DATED : 16th April, 2009 DATED : 16th April, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The appellant herein has filed Civil Application (ST.) No.9644 of 2009 for deletion of respondent No.1 and respondent No.5 as they have expired. That application has been granted few minutes back. Office to number the Civil Application for statistical purpose. ( 2 ) 2. The learned advocate appearing on behalf of respondent as well as learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.2,3 and 4 have jointly tendered the consent terms in this Second Appeal being consent terms dated 8th April, 2009, which are duly signed by the appellant, advocate for appellant, respondent Nos.3 and 4 and advocate for respondent Nos.2,3 and 4. The respondent Nos.6,7 and 8 are government authorities who are really not concerned with the settlement between the parties. Consent terms dated 8th April, 2009 are taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. 3. Both the learned advocates i.e. learned advocate Mr.Gavnekar and Ms.Gauri Godse pray for decree in terms of consent terms. In view of the request by counsels, there shall be a decree in terms of consent terms with no order as to costs. Accordingly, Regular Civil Suit No.109 of 1985 stands dismissed with no order as to costs. Second Appeal is disposed of in above terms. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)