.r.v^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition N0. o? ^fr^"/2004 PETITIONER 4^-^$ ^^^'- .^^^' ^y^ ^:'\: ..c» ^v~' RESPONDENTS t?y. w^^ •^- • Raj Kumar Rajpoot,aged 28 Yrs S/o. Late Chhedilal singh Rajpoot R/o Vill. Budhwara, Post Mohgaon Tahsil Sajaa, Distt. Durg (C.G.) y VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 3. StateofM.P. Through Secretory Education Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) 4. Union of India through the Secretary Department of Personal, Public Grievance, and personnel, Third Hoor, Loknayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New-Delhi. WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER FORM OR DIRECTION OR ORDEJl AS TO THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. / HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH ; BILASPUR SINGLE BBNCH : HON'BLE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION N0. 2875_OF 2004 Petitioner Respondents versus Raj Kuraar Rajpoot State of Clihattisgarh aiid ofliers Pfesent : Shri Sudhir Verma, coiinsel for fbe petitioner, Snit Anju Ahuja, Depuly Govemixieut Advocate for the State. Shn S.K. Beriwal, coiuisel for fhe respondent No.4. ORAL ORDBR (26th April, 2006) 1. The petitioner's father Shri Chhedilal Smgh Rajpoot died on 3.12.1999 m haraess while workiag as Head Master m Primary School, at Basin, Distdct Durg; The petitioner raade aa appUcation for corapassionate appoiatment on 30.6.2000, but tUl date, his appUcation for coinpassionate appouitnient has not been decided. 2, The Goverament of Chhattisgarh, by its circiilar dated 2-2- 2006, has directed aU fhe departinents to consider cases of aU the eUgible dependaiit-legal heii' of fhe eniployees, who died ia haraess between 1-11-1997 to 31-10-2000 for conipassionate appouitment. 3, Accordnigly, the Goveniment of Chhattisgarh is directed to consider the case of fhe petitioner as per its own circular dated 2-2-2006 aad also in view of fhe oider dated 20-12-2005 passed by tliis Coiirt m Writ Petition No. 1322/2002 aiid other^ ^ l^ 4. connected niatters on its own nierit, ia accordaace wifli law, on siich representation beuig filed by fhe petitioner. For the reasons stated above, the writ petition staiids disposed of No onler as to costs, Certrfied copy as per niles. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge