HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR <52 W. P. No. 3275 of 2003 Petitioners 1. Ghasiram S/o Late Dokri, R/Q Village-Jharna, RJ. Circle-Tamnar. Tah. Gharghoda. 'Distt. Raigarh (C.G) 2. Bhojram S/o Sukul, R/o Village; Milupara, Tah. Gharghoda, ’Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Minister Das S/o Masat Das, R/o Village-Tamnar, Tah. Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Dasrath S/o Sodhan. R/o vill.~ Dhourabhatha, Tah. Gharghoda. Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) M” 5. Bhagatram S/o §ukhau Rio Village-Urba, Tah. Gharghoda. Disft. Raigarh'(C.G.) 6. Burhu S/o Samaru, Rio Village- Pata, Tah. Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. The Siate of Chhattisgarh, Through-The Collector, District — Raigarh (C.G.) Naib Tahsildar, Sub-Tahsil— Tamnar, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IQDIA SB: Hon'ble Justice Satish K. Agnihotriv Shri Ashok Das Vaishnav, Advocate with Shri Sameer Sahu, Advocates for the petitioners. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the respondents. r W: o R D E R I (Passed on this 18‘” day of June, 2007) 1. The case of the petitioners is that they are in possession of the lands, which were in possession of their predecessors. The possessions of the lands in question have been uninterrupted and continuous. The petitioners are presently working as Kotwar. The petitioners claim Bhoomiswami rights over the lands which have been granted by the competent authority to their predecessors. prior ' to 1950. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submts that the facts and question of law involved in this petition, as well as the relief sought. are similar to that of in W. P. No. 341 of 2002 (Fatte Singh and others Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others), which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 22"“ February, 2007, in the following terms:- “ln the resolt. this petition is disposed of with tl'i‘égdirection that the competent authority shall consider the case of the petitioners for grant of Bhoomiswami right, in accordance with law after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the‘concerned parties, within a period of three months from the date of receipt-of a copy of this order." 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State does not dispute the above fact. 4. ln view of the above, this petition stands disposed of in terms of the order dated 22.2.2007, passed by this Court in W. P. No. 341 of 2002 (Fatte Singh and others Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others). No order as to costs. l Thakur Sd/‘ _ . i K. Agmmm i .\ \ ,‘\ Satish Judge i. a i