RSA No.2327 of 2004 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.2327 of 2004 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.01.2010 Rameshwar Dass ..Appellant Vs. Gulab Singh ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA Present: Mr.B.R.Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr.Sanjay Mittal, Advocate, for the respondent. Vinod K.Sharma, J, (Oral This regular second appeal was admitted by this court on 28.8.2008 on the following substantial question of law:- “ Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the first appellate court was right in holding that the agreement Exhibit P-1 was valid even though the said agreement admittedly contained a number of mistakes in regard to nature of land, the share to be sold and the delivery of possession etc.?” RSA No.2327 of 2004 2 Learned counsel for the appellant has now placed on record a compromise entered into between the parties, which is taken on record as Ex.A. It is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent that a sum of Rs.3 lacs (Rupees three lacs only) in satisfaction of his claim has been received by him and the agreement of sale stands cancelled. Respondent has also agreed that he has no concern whatsoever, with the land in question, now. His claim stands satisfied with receipt of Rs.3 lacs. In view of the compromise entered into between the parties, the decree for specific performance has become inexecutable. Learned counsel for the appellant, therefore, does not wish to press this appeal, in view of the fact that agreement to sell has become inoperative, thereby rendering the decree passed by the learned courts inexecutable. Appeal dismissed as not pressed. (Vinod K.Sharma) 12.01.2010 Judge rp