sSiSsRiB P RF In the Honble High Court of Chhattishearh at Bilaspur (C. G.) 13 W.P. No.....................i.^i?............... 2006 Petitioner Respondent ... Smt. Dr. Vandana Bhele, aged 36 years Wife of Hitendra Chauhan, Primary Health Center, Nandkattfu_ Block Nikum District DurgTC.G.) Versus ... 1. The State Govemment of Chhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, Health & Family Welfare Deptt. Ministry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Mukhya Chikitsa & Swastha Adhikaq Durg. / Writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance ofwrit in the nature ofmandamus certiorari, prohibition and for other suitable writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions. _T^ Xi-HC-22 Ta '^PTRfq, '^ftWTB, RtWI'My IfPKtl Shliqi_.^^.:..J.??le^ SlI^F^iI h-\iv 3nS?i ^?TT<^^T?a i*llicl''i1'l HWcfl^fest thiK^lt ' ^s aipgii sn^n .,-e'-. 4-1-2006 Shri R.S.Shrivastava, couns^l for the petitioner. Shri Vivek Sharma, Ponel La^uyer for the State. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner has been transferred petitioner submits that the from Primary Health Center, Ncndkatt+ii, Block Nikum, &istri4t burg to Community Health Center, Dongargarh, bistrict Raj^iandgabn (Annexure-P/1). He also submits that during the ban trouisferred that too without coo Iperiod the petitioner has been ^•dination ond prior approval bf the Chief Minister. Learned coun^el appearing for the petitioner submits that for the presentend^of justice will beserved if a direction js giveh to- the responc^ent authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner. The prayer is not opposedb)| the other side. Having considered and witt^out expressing anyopinion on The merits of the case the pet detailed representation raising tioner is directed to make a her grievances before the competent authority of responde^nts alongwith q copy of the petition and tliisorder within g pe^-iod of 15 days from today and on such representation being filei?, the competent authority of ['Tft^ ^R^ XI-HC-22 sii^r^iT ft-ti'* sn^t ?h^ic»i^fi^t c:1 <.. %t ©owri •3^'^rai?p(,"s^Ire, 'fatfiuy tUe as ddte griev<|nce the respondents shall decide accordonce with law as early period of two months from the It is made clear that if any may avail the remedy avoulable und^ Learned counsel for the p| the petitioner has not yet reli'4' interim relief. • . In view of the above, it is & not relieved she may be fl^l representation is decjded. It is has already been relieved, thijs petitioner to rejoin at the earlier |^1 With the aforesaid disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.).P.No.^ Certified copy as per rules. ^il^I^n ^FFI^f ^ f^3t Tf^T^IT ^ ariigir an^r same on its own merits in ^ possible preferobly within <t of receipt of representation. still remains, the petitionep fer the law. fetitioner submits thait till date ^ved. He prays for grcnt of directed that if the petitioner is llowed to continue till the njade clear thot if the petitiooer thiis order will not entitle the •lier ^lace of posting. obs^rvations, this petition stands |9/06 also stands disposed 6f. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge