FARAD CONTINUTION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Contempt petn No. 380 of 2005 -------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office Court or Judge’s Order Memorandum of Coram appearence,Court’s Orders & Directions and Registrar’s Order --------------------------------------------------- Mr.D.J.Bhange for petitioner Mr N P Deshpande for respondent nos 2,3, and 4 CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM; A.M.KHANWILKAR J. DATED l3.4.2006 DATED l3.4.2006 DATED l3.4.2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The grievance in this petition is that inspite of the order passed by the division bench of this court on l6.2.2005 the respondent no. 2 Standing Committee has still not decided the appeal which was required to be disposed of not later than 3l.3.2005. The affidavit of Mr.R.K.Wagh Dy Chief Executive Officer has been filed before this court in the present proceedings. It is clearly mentioned that the appeal preferred by the petitioner before the Standing Committee (dated l8.l.2002) was disposed of as back as on 23.l0.2003, though the order came to be passed by this court on l6.2.2005. It is obvious that the respondent no.2 was not represented before this court when the order dated l6.2.2005 came to be passed. As the appeal already stands disposed of, the direction given in para 2 of the order also stands complied with. No case for contempt is made out. Hence petition is dismissed. Notice issued to the respondent stands discharged. . It is made clear that the dismissal of this petition or any observations made herein will not influence the proceedings challenging the decision of the Standing Committee dismissing the appeal of the petitioner. That will be considered on its on merits in accordance with law.