/ ZN THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATraSGARH WRTT PETmON No. 2Sl<S C>~OF 2002/ PETmONER Versus Dr. Smt. Kumudjni Kerketta (Mjnj), aged about 42 years, W/o Mr. Vivlan Mjnj, working as Assistant Surgeon, District Hospitai, Jashpurnagar, Distrjct Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) RESPONDENTS ^^ 1. Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Personnet, Public Grievances and Pension/ Mantralaya, Personnel & Training, New DelhS. 2. State of Madhya Pradesh through the Secretary, Department of Public Health and Famjly Welfare, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) 3. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Public Health and Family Weifare, D.K.S.Butlding, Mantrataya, Raipur (Chhattisaarh) 4. Chief Medical and Heaith Officer, Jashpurnagar, district Jashpur (Chhattlsgarh) 5. Director, Heaith Services, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) WRTTPETTTION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE coNSTrrunoN OF INDIA -aS . £;£ - £3aS XI-HC-22 ^nit^T^ f^ii<»»<w^w ^^II^^TO^ To? v<{ww€{,^^wi^, Ri<ni«y «311^9T ^flRTi? , w. ^.''^^^IV^' NINdl a»N<ch"" ' *' "^^"^H^ 200 'f^-iVk^ f^Rsr^ar' <HJ<i?fi CWIW t<(^a 28/4/2003 Parties as beforc. Order passed, signed Since common orders order bc placed in thc record ar|d dated. It^ve been passed, a copy of this l)f all the connected mattei s and cause title ol' meino ot' petiti(jns ,may be annexed albiig with the copy of thls order in each}case. A.R. (J)_to do the^needful. w^<?«fl-iwrof^fe^^pgR ^T3lPOT3H^T —-_—.-._A,_,, __ Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ^w^^^ •^^•/. •J': ^:^'^^^^':^.^.{ ^'v- XI4IC.22 ^ ^W ^l<tK?T^ ^tflwt^ ftlCttKy 3?I^?T 1CRW ,,^ '^-400 \'y.1^.-' .:-.:;'-'-'"-^ -^^^^•"•^ -WWffflCTfy^' w fao^ :11^?";:^;. r^-' .;"^':^>-'p '•"•"4 -;; . "mm • • ^"T. w4w^<iw#^?kl4i&rt^w iFinftn^v ;;^^^p :tii ^-;',.'; ^^c '••^^ r; (28-4-2QQp) \ been filed by the petitioners •^•,^^ Itates under thef M.P. Statc This batch of petitions ha^ ^n. A ••:.. ^•.^.-.v' ••"<i pursuant to thc crcation1 of ^ .{ • .IteorgantpriOQ Aci 2oqo^ The d^putes^TejLa^wtljieaJlocatlon 's •"?j' •1'' - ^w'^y''i''}i''^^/'' \;': boveiiunent. It i$ contended ^' i i of the employees of (he State that uilder tlie pi-ovisions ofthej or at the behest of tiie Centi'^l Goveniment, G^ptions were •?; Act and policy^r^ined by and fii. uivited. It is submitted tliat G^al allocadon has been maclc aiid aggileved bv- tlie saine th before thi^ Court claiming relie / 2. Leai'ned coimsel for all th that in Uie present batch of pei ;se peiitions have been filed s mentioned therein. i^ petitioners stated at the Baj' litions, none of the petitioners is in jiKiiciaJ sei-vice or in ine ^ervicc of Vidhan Sabha. Tl-iev all are cniplo\ce?. of tlie dcpaj said ctepaiTmenTS. Ii js aiso ST^ ar morio]-i hea.i'ing aiici rl-iey ai'e) [Itmenis other thgn thc abovc bed Tliai some cases are llsred being heai'cl analogously with [^^fert 1 •/^•^^^^:' XI-HC.22 (SS. 'y^ ^ww^ ^^wi^, ^wy 3n^?T '<T5ra? HI^^I gKTHqT<<'''"'WWWMMM<^M<^ ^)F^ 200 "—"•-ftrey'—r~"*""" w^srw ft-ll^ «>^^ h^<^: A .^' ^KU^K tt<X»f consent of the parties firiolly, ^ ' . ..; .:' aiid the acknowledgemeilts ha?) 3. Shri. Mizrtliy submitted filcd thc rctum iii W.P. No. 2^ same be adgpted in aU com| opposed and allowed. 4. Sliri Smijay . K. Agra^ *wfci<a<i *u*<*ff<p(*<fl <R<*<K |as copi^s have been suppliecl e been obtained Iiat Central Govemment has [53/2002 and prayed that thc ected cases, which was not submitted tliat State has filed (^ No.2215/02 (Dr. R.K. Tiwaii vs vs. Unioii of India) and No:24i vs. Unioi^ of India). He furth^r submitted that t-he saiiie be adopted in otlier cases also, allowed. \al, Dy. Advocate General, letailed rctum in Writ Petitions State), No. 2547/02 (Bliimrao ^7/02 (Sliiya Sliai-aii Sliaj-iua which was not opposed and During llie course ofai'gL|ments, counsel for some oftlie pctiiionci^ siil-;ii'iiitcd that tlie wa\~ oe i.akeii/fileci/Tagged. havc tlled tlic synopsi^. Tlicv [^^fel^ XI-HC.22 3 y5r ^i<4w^, <9xilwi<o, fti^wy sn^ ^f^K N<»wij^Rin^* ^ W"^'M'M w^g^ -2fl0 -—• fa^K"*"•"""*•"—~~~"' W^IIBI •-^-^^^T" ^NI^B ^IOWX ^ftd 6. Coiinsel for, t.he petitioT] cases, tlieir sp0iA$<es are j '<liW(dp!l<(WNJ[1^ft^\(^r« i?3|pOTatA<T |ers pointed oiit ,t.har in some ^•orking in the Govt./Semi Govemment departments of; bccn allocated to another Stat<| I,>ne State whereas thev havc and in that vicw pf tlie uiatter, they pray tliat ttiey should;3a|ive beeri allocate^ to the same State where tJ^eir spouses arf reorganizadon of the State, in ui sepai'aie State, has re| scpai'ation causiiig di5tLU<baii<| partiiig compaiiv of cliildrcii a| working. It is submitted that h""" ^ [so far as they have been posted ^dted m automatic judicial c m dicu- faiuily lifc, cspcciallv id pai'eiits. IL is subiiiiLted lliai while deolding the allocation D|iatter, ttiis aspect has not been considered in proper prosp; reconsider tl^ie sauie, Their ca^ bctive and tliere is iieecl TO es should also be considered. It is cojitcndcd tJ-iat po^ting of serving spoiises in tJic 1 w^ ^rporatc offices, organizarioii^ Coi'i^oraiion, LocaJ bodie^, Q ;u-ici InsiiiuDons is aJso a claj5S of spouses who clesen^e ilie saiiie consideration. '}*he^' coiitenctecl that thev aj'e sei-ving m {^^fe^ (% Ss^m^ 'iS'^^' XI-HC.22 •^^'^^^>^^te^--- 4 'CTS? ^il^W^, ^<flw«e, ?K?tW^< an^T ^rar NWWV^K^ "M 296 ftre^sr a8^(iwiw<ft?r ^.±-..:- ^ ^ese dcpartniftnrs liecansft thejOovt. jobs were i^ot availahle ^wrf8ptor?tWEi<l|toA ^W^H ^alftnah^i le IJtiotthein, They also contende<| that in case they are not €dlocat«l.lnthe same State, it nj ;:.::^-^"^/, not only manpowcr but jnay al [av result in criininal wasCe of b create econouiic criscs aiicl r: affect the oadonal growih. jTMeir cases may also be ''" 1 , • '' considered. ' 8. It is submitted that durm j ';;A-i- persons have retired or nearing ycai- i.c. upto 31Et.Octobcr, 20 tlie interveiiing.peripd some '.'^.'?' '^ [iie age ofretirement, say this D3. Thcv submit tliat tlicir <;ascs mav bc coiisidcred so tliat tlierc 1s 110 diHicultx iii apportionment of retiral benefll^ at tiie earliest aj-id may settle tli Their cases ma\ aJso be coiisidej |? and they may get the -saiiie ^mselves in their home town. ]{ i-s fiirttici 5ubmittccl b\ rhar t^esides rt-ie cases or'spouse] finaJ ailocanon neecis ti 'ed. ^y lie cotinscl for thc petitionci^ ^, iliere are orher cases wliere 1'ther consicleration ancl {^^xw^ JP-HC-22 <M') "3^f •<4<<4K1<<, ^Tll^^, ft(Cl(i<^< 3TT^?T ^3W <»*#niVW ——^^ ^^ tegir sB^ir^r frwo ^^<i ff»*<w» o«^ittdi^t ^*ft<i heconsider^rion ^nd r^regories 1^<e m^n^^ge of p^rties ^fi^?* )ption, mutual cases, bonafidil residence, non-caUing of l^ption etc. Wliich have been me^tioned by the pefitioners in yjticir i-cspcctlvc pctiUons. LO. 11,1s coni^nded Uiai Uiere,|ire-some persons who have ^een mamed in benveen as their! nd has taken place after die a^ ^here ai'e few cases of this categ<| bQn^idcrccl. II 1. Il is poiiiicd OUL Lliai emplo^ yiocar.ion. IV is submitted that nj [inder t]ie provisions of scheme ^ iLliocalioiis have been consideil |)ctilionci<^ hQvc bccn rcjectcd/n^ marriage was earlier settlecl pouued day i.e. 1-11-2000. ^rv. Theii' cases mav aJso Ix^ ees Iiave applied for mutiiaJ .utual allocatlon is possil^le nd the few cases of miiliial ed \vhereas cases of t.1 ic >t properlv considcred, ll is 'iirtlici siil^mittrd tl-iat thc miitu^il adju^tmciit i5 pcrmi<)5il;lc ind ma\' oe coi^sidered aiid esp^ciallv in ihose cases wliere lie j^ersons a])\)[\ iiig for muTual ^ JlocaTion cto not clistiii-b ^y {^^f^ XI-HC-22 6 "5^ ^ww^, ^rSiwi^, P«riwy 3ff^?r ^(^K WWF(T'3R^l9?****w*'w'Mwm'^':w'MW'^T^ 200 Rljb<iyi' M; W^T^A t^tt^ ^«SW ^ww ^t<iw< w^^i ^ seniority or otheT'wise ^ffectin there are^other categories of. the State excheqiier. Tr is rh^r ijnployees Uke change of option after ms|i|iage. "^ftigil."' r"-""^^ 12. It is contended t&at place^of theljE|^9ifce. T^y op||d given another State and unde] be given the place of their reconsider in accordance with tlicy may bc givcn thc placc of] 13. Duruig diclalioii, iL is f Maiiindya Shrivastava, P. Diw] Shrivastava, Awadh Tripathl Hai^ieeda Siddique that in thej theni wherc t.hc employces bccausc of thc compclliiig circji 14. IT mav be noied ihai m^r heai'ct on earlier clates. How(f\ *w(w8-i w*if<i fe^ <r<(^i< ^,3^R3SB^ff certaJmL^persons have not been given opl^djfor a;panlculaTrState bui are the policy tticy are entitled t.o choice. Their cases niay be |the policy and if it is possible, Ithcu' choicc. also submiLtcd bv S/Slu-i ^ar, Prashant Mishra, Rajeev Sandeep Dnbey ancl Smt. lf batch, there ai'e sonie cases of have chaiiged thcir o])tioris mstaiiccs mcntioncd thcrcin. .v of these maiT.ers have been er, detailecl ai'gumenrs ^'erc:' [^^fe^ XI-HC-22 ^^r ^l^td^ ^xtl^Ko, f<«rt{^y 3H^?T TC^R? 1TOW95W3F *" ^^w-*w—-—^^ ^g^ T~-""lN^r~~"—" M7;) 3B^T^T fe^^ »>*ff<l»^SS^Q ^KK^ ttt^<l advanceri on 23-4-2003 biit coi ^ ' ', of the Cour^^and it was stated the State of Cfahattisgarh Shri Advocate Gcncral of the State ]1d nor be condiided ri11 T-ising Itfiat the Advocate General of Ravindra Shrivastava aiid the M.P. Shri V.K.Tankha would address Qil.,;] ^IS- Qf^^fieu' rp^peciive States. Shri Murihy, . r leai'ned eounsel for the Union defuiite insti'uctioris/from the D(rector (S.R.) concemed on die qucstions raised especiaUtv re^arding cbnsideration of the werc dii'cctcd to bc listcd for rcprc^cntadoiis aiid thc niattci| lieaiiiig 011 24-4-2003, Llicrefoil been lis^ed accordingly. ArgL^ extentio. 15. Shri Ravuidra Shrivast^v^ r.1xc Statc 6f CI^hat.tisgarl^ aiic| Advocatc Gciicral of tlic State ofl rhe cillocauon under ihe i^rovlsid ACT 20^)G) is concernecl, rlie po\^ 4»KrfW&'<'W^S 'it'fe^A <Rnt^H ^aiPwaB^r India was given time to seek , baLcli of Lliese cases liavc nients have l^een heard at , leai'ned Advocate General oj' ' Shri V.K. Tanklia. lcaj'iK-^i M,P. ^ubmicrccl thar 50 fai a: ts ofrhe M.F. Reorgajilsarion er is vestecl with The ('enTrnl [^^fm ,-L.. XI-HC-22 ^n^r^r ^i<t» 'l^ttt^. ••.^^^^^<;^^..^^^ •.. -..•-•: '•.:'..-:;:- •:;K^%?%^li^^^^'-^.^:'':;.-.^;^". ..'<:-^-^^^.^.-^. ^1.'-.;.<-:-'.• • • •,.;;;..;-.. '^^..:.-:...^..,.:^:,.,^,^.-_ • ^E? ^i<4w<<, ^Tftww, ft9roy f ^ & sn^r ^w.;. .„,.•.;:'' ':;;:'VS^K; ^ ^:: ^^ ^dwir th*wfc R<*<ya ^fl^^l ^WWK Trf^ "^ ••20®.-.--..-—^-..ii,^^^.. •.-.^^-^ -^..^111^:- <i>t<t(<i4li Ciovt. and J:he role of the re| aid aiid assist tlie Central' information. It is submitted do so as and whcn rcquii] dlrected bf this Court. ^^tpa*ioli^i 16. So tar as provisions r€|latlng sectksns 68, 69, 70, 71^ below:- ipftctive'St^tR govftmments is to Govt. and provide the requisite hat thev have done so and would :d bv thc Ccntral Oovt. or as to services are concemed, ? ~ id 72 are relevs(nt;,ahd quoted ^,-^ :;^^^ "68. Provisions rclatiiib to scrviccs in Madliv-a rradcsli and Chhattisgarh-(l) [Every person who immediately beforc tlie appouitc(L4^y i» servuig ui coiuiecLioii witli the affaii-s ofthe exist^ng State ofMadhya Praesh shall, on and from that dav |3rovisionally contiiiue to se]-ve ui connection with the jaffalrs of the State of Madh\ a Pradesh unless he is order of tlie Ceiitral •Q in coiinect.ion \vith ChhaTTisgaj'n: Providcd that iio dire| sectioii at'ter rtie expii] dav. (2) As soon a.s ma\-j Cenrrai GOVT. Shall.1 deteniiine U-ie succesj referr^cl to in sub-sed scrvict: aiid tlie dat reqiiired, by general or specia) tovcnuneni to serve provisioiiall\ the affairs of the State of ;Uoii sl^all be issued undcr this [\ of oiie vear trom the appointecl be Lifter the appoiiited day, tlie b^ general or special orcier. ^or State to wliich eveiy person ion H) sl-iall be finally allotte.cl Ibr \\-}[h effeci from wliich sucli [^^fe^ ('^4.; XI-HC-22 ^n^rw ftWF ^s 9 ^r^ ^wm^, yrOwi^, flRTOy 3Tr^r "qsra? •nNniWElftl?"""""""""""""*"' "^p^ 200 —•ftre^r" ll^ <HI^^I ^<B^< W^d ft( *«4wfl^HiwT <f ft«4ifti4^< It (3) Every,person whc^ provisions qf sub-sectioij is fmally allotted under rli^ (2) to a successor State sliall, if he is not already servi4g tllerein be made available for seiving in the successor^tate from such date as may be agreed upon between th^ Governnients concerned or in default of such agreeme4t, as may be detemimed l^y Tt-ie Central Ooverninent. I 69.Provisions relating tfc other services-(l) Nothing ui ihis s^ction or section 6^ after tlie appointed dayj > shaU be deemed to afl'ecT on or the operation of the provisions of Chapter I of Part XW <j>f the Constitution in relation to deteruiination of the c< nditions of service of persons immediately betbre the i persoii dceiued to liav^ sei-vmg iii coiiiiection \fitli the affau's of tlie Union or anv State : Provided that the coiditions of seivice ap}3licable ^ppointed day in the case ot any beeii allocated to tlie State ol Madhya Pradesh or to l|he State of Chhattisgarh under Section 68 shall. iiot |3e vaiied to liis disadvaiitage except with the previou^ of the Cenfaral Goveniment. [2] Ali sei-vices prior to fhe appointed day renderect Dv a person- (a) if he is deen^ed to have been allocated to ai^y State under section 68| sha]l be deemed to have Iwei-i rendcrcd in conncctioiihvith the affairs ofthat Statc, (b) if he is deemed t.o Ii^ve been ailocated to the liiiioi] iii connecnon \vM~\ | Tl'ie' aclmmlst.rarion oi' rlic Cl-iliattisgai-l^ sliall bc cjeeined to have been rendercd ii~i coiinecrioii with rlic ^ft^irs ofrhe Union, foi thc i^urposcs ofthe service. i.3) The provlslons of tSeciion 68, shall noi relatioi^ lo meml)ers of^nv All India Sei'vTice. ~7<). Provisions as ro (lontinuai-ice ot' ofticers In saiiK.' ]X)st:- (1) Eveiy pcrso^ vvho. immediately bcibrc ll-ir ule-> regulating iiis conditioii-s of a1^p}^' iii @'; t<i»«irt "/ • •'.^.^l^.^i^" XI-HC-22 w^yw ftli^ Wl^ i^w^a 10 75? -<41<4W<<, ^rft^KS, ftl<!11«y 3n^?T T^w NINCTI <(pqj-2p'—"*-—"—-——'—-""t'^p^ ^g^ ftns^CT' «*wnwwww ftl appointed day is holdingj post or Dffice in conne< existing State of Madhya that dav falls withln anv continue to hold the successor State, and shal] day, to havc been duly tlie Govemraent of, or in^ that guccessor State : Provided that nbthing in prevent a competent appointed day, from passj aiiy order affectiiig the office. 71. AdvisoiT Committees- 11 |or discharging diities of an\ Idon with tlie afTairs of tfie pradesh m any area wliich on lof the. successor States shall ^uaie post or office ui that be deemed, on and from that apjwuited to the post or office by otlier appropriate autliority aifV tbis Section shall be deemed to al-ithority, on and from the |ng in relation to such person 'ontmuaiice in such post or by order establish one or Llic purpose of assistiiig it iii (a) the dischm'ge of aiiy of aiid (b) the ensuring of fair ali| per^ons afTected by t.he ^ proper consideration of such persons. 72. Powci of Central Guver Ceiitral Goven^mei^t may, gi-j Goveniinei^T ol'Macll^'a Prad^ of Chliat.tisgarh as iiiay d|3p^ purpose ot' giving ^t'frcT tn t^ Pait ancl t]~ic Staie Crovciliu directions." <Ki«4(iwirir4ft<«fliftit^R ^VpWVSpK lie Centi'al Goveraiment may, utore Advison7 Committees tbr rcgai'd to- Ls fmictions mider this Pai't; equitable treatoaient to aU rovisions of this Part anct the uiv representations madc by [mciit to pive dircction^- Tlie such directions to the State ?h ajicl rhe Srate Govenimeni u' t.o il to bc necessai'\ for {he ^ Toregoing provisions of ttiis it-.iit sliall comply with siicli I^^rt ..:^^%-?il^w'^ XI-HC-22 an^rw (^nl5> ^t^^n ^a 11 -3'^ ^l^ld^l, ^^«4i<fi, fa<nwy 3ff^?T 'VT^ NI^ICTI -gyq^—————mM*"WM**^'"^i^ 200 ,•••«••—•»••»*•—••—»<^—»< •••••••»••—•«•• ou^i ^wiw\\ TM^U 17. It is siihmittjRrl hy Shn M bifi-ircation of the State ot guidelines were franied sepai and R/5. Statc of Chliattisj 1/11/2000. The Govemment coi-ilerred under Section 71 o{' the M.P. Keorganization Act; 2000 coiistituted a. committ^s by order dated Jaiiuaiy 1, 2001 mider Chainiiansliip ol mcmbcrs, wliicli is popLdarly i is fLU'tlier subuiilled lliaL u [,62,46 t /employees of 9 t dep; provisional aJlocations were n allocat-ioii, cert^jii najines co Ceiit.ral Govei'nii'iciit dcc.idecl allocation li^t, covcriiiig al] informin^ inein of Their i^roj: oTher siircessor Stare aiici inv] wrfwa-i wrir-iifc^ <R(^K ^ ^iPa^t <^i^<l iirthy that thftre was process of M.P., tlierefore, the policy ate vide Aiinexures-R/1, R/2 ^ai'h carac iiito cxistcncc 011 of India in exerclse of powers Sliri N.B. Lohani with other hovvii as Lohaiii Coiiimittcc. It aLtcrs of allocatioii of aboui irtmenr.s were dealt with. First 4ade. Tn tl-ie said provisional |_ild not find place. Then the Ito introduce Q t.cntarive fina} pei 50iincl aj.id tcnt^^iYcl^ bsecl ailocauon r.o one or ilic [ing representations trom rhem {^i^fe^ 7. :'^.i's';-.^^^ XI-HC-22 w^^ (^ll^l ^t<§<! S(»*<1<»>Kl^a 12 ^a? ^1<41<?1^ ^xtl^4!^ {<<^IWy 3H^T XR(q? IIN^B 'ViJ^^^^^^^ ^^^ y^ >••••——^••—••—»•»•••••<••»»•• ?W f«u^<w^a ^Rftl against. t.he same. Therpfore, the representations before These representations wer< dcpai-tiiicnt and thcy wcrc conslderaiipn and 4014 rep the claiiiis of about 467S Govei'nuienr considered tll i 8692 aggneved personnel nia<le |the State Advisdry Committee. exainuied bv the conccrned Ifonvardcd to tlic committcc foj rcscntations were accepted ancl ? were rejectecl. The Ccntral [e request of State Advisory rcprcscnt<ition5 wcrc rcccr CliliaiLisgai'Ii, iu lieu of M. Ceiit-raJ Governmeiil.. Il is ^ Covcrnincnt ha^ donc its bd ilicic i-s no jjrciiidicc again^t. 18. S i iri M \Anh\ , appeoi'ir 5latcd ajul ^ul^inittcd th ^i^dwft^ "wwB4 flrtS <fatsr« ^?3lpTO^^ff C^mmittee aiid decided to a|locate 219 excess optees, whose [cd to thc 5iiccc»sor Statc of ). as rccoiumciidcd bv tlie saicl .iiitted that in additlon to at^ove committee. It is further subl 219 excess optees, 43 additicjnal cases were consiclered 1)\ tlie Iso subinilt.ed that llie Ceiil.ral st under ihc ci]*cuinstai]c«;s aud uiv {jcr^on. ^ for the IJnion of !ndia f<iirl\ if thc rciji'c.5Ci^lat.ioii<5 cu <- [^^{^ XI-HC-22 sn^rw ftii^ ^<^<i ww 13 T^ ^TWRT^, ^T{l«4i<s, T<<^i«y iiT) 3ff^?T ^T^ WNWI <bH|€|» '•(H, 200 R<*<w ^Wft twii^i\ niftn siihmit.ted ciiily siipported hyl petitions and annexm'es filed,' consider tlie saiiie afresh. It wlzich lias bccn fraracd is aft^ representations will. be decl(| provisions of law aiid the polici^ ttie 19. It is conrended ihat f4lr and equimble treatmeni envisages a declsion, which |s fair aiid equitable to all. Reliance has been placed on a| decision of the Hon^le Apex Court in the case of State of Mlaliai'ashtra vs. ChandrakarM, re]^orted;'iii AIR 1981 SC T 990. 20. Il ib ijcrtiiicnt tu jiulc Reorgaiiizarion ACI 2<J(.":) casis ensl^riiied iirider The snid Act equital^le treatment to all pers< ol' Parl V71II ancl tlie prc I'cprc.^ciitalioii^ uiadc bv :5Licli } wqferi^^pffif 4 ftcA xftn?^ ifr ^ip<i4 on^<i dociiments and copy nf rhe Central GoveiTunent would s submitted that the Policv r duc cunsidcratioii aiid tlic •<S in accordance wlih ihe s tranied. tlliat Scctiuii 71 uf tlic M.P. dul^' oi] Ceiiii'aJ Govenimeni Wliat is eiisiirecl is t'ai]' r^iKl |ns affected by the provisions ^er consideration of ^xi)\ Cl^Oll. It i^ fol' tllC CciitiaJ [^»^rt •-^ 1-4 XI-HC-22 3?y^r^RT ftii^ <aflit<n »>*<i^»tifta p'"11"^^. TO? •<(1<41<>1^, ^Tfl^<l<S, f<<diy^< 3TI^T 1RRR Niini gpq^"—•——•••—•———••—•—^p^ ^O fd*<ff' ^w<i fwiw w^a ft? ^»i<rfCT<fii^wvS 4 fc^t <n^t^i< i»a<<w^v GoveiTimftnt. To ensiire fair ^nd eqiiitahle treatment to a11 persons afiected by tlie releva|iit provisions of the part VIII of the M.P. Reorgaiiization consideration of aiiy rcpreserj Under the tacts aiid clrcunisl Act 2000 and the proper tations inadc by such pcr^on^. canCes xhis courr would llke ro "r ot' C-entr^ G obsei've that power nierely by layuig down cr| coiitinues till entire proces| doubts rcsolvcd aiid all rcprc^ 21. Having thus considered| 1 the case ai~id in view of the s| un bclialfof thc pai'tic^, iii tl'| lusnce \vill !)e scrvccl ll' ail l^etlTioners, ti'iose \yV\o d represenmrion raising rheir g| C'tovernment is not exhausted teria. for flnal altotment but ^ is completed, all problems, ciitations coiisidcrcd. the facts and circuinstaiices of Latcnients niade bv the counscl c opinion of tlii^ Court, ciid-s of oppo]'MiniT\' is glven ro T]-K ^sii'p, ro make a (-let^il^-d "ievai-ices along \vith documenis (.)('J(° on G]' before. 10Tn ^1Q^ 2()CJ(3 t<^ t-he Cei-iLrol Governme.})! addic^^cc] lo thc Oovcniii |eiit or Iiidia, Dcpailiudit ui' {^^srt XI-HC-22 15 ^^ -<<t^«vi^, t9T{i^<i<s, 9<dW;i< ^%'^^£- •© 3TI^?T 'qira? NTNCH WTHKd "^ 200 'ftpR^ar" sn^crw ftpri?w ^?<<^ IIH^I ^m'iv\ ^II^?M Personal and Trainiiig, Min| Grievancfss aiid Pensions, Lokh^iyak New DeUii ^(State Reorganizati^ rcprcscntation dLdy sp.pportcd seFV^<miAi^pnceTned|Depai^a^^ obtalning tlie acknowledgemeilt foi-wai'd tlie saiae ^to the Gentral Govei-nnient with their commente aiid thc requisite uifo| witliin 30 days, iii ordcr to enab. dccidc the represeniation. ItJs seek sLicli' further mformation ti'om the State Govemments aad on si-ich requisition beii Goveniment; tl~ie St^t.e Governti expeditiousl\\ On such a repr^ Ccntral Govcrnuicnt ^hall con^i oa^I^- as posslbie 13^eJe^abl^· on Dassing appropriare orcle.rs. vaSwSnw^^fpfl Tftn?R '^T^tPW istiy of Personal, Public Bhawan, Khan Market, n Cell). Sanie copy of the by all docuincnte bc also oft)0l3ittie^?;atesafter and boUi tlie' States to 'mation and coniplete details tlic Osiitral Govei'iuaient to )peii to tlic Central Govt. lo g made from the Centra] lents will supplv" Uie saiiie scnlation beii'ig made, rjic :lei and decidc -t.hc ^ainc a^ r before 31!-'t Julv, 20U3 b\- [^i^fia^ XI-HC-22 ^aw ftii^^i^ FN<aN^» 16 ^r^r ^wid^, ^T{)^II<?, hw«y 3n^?T tl5RF Nd^l <bNici»* "^ 200 .r^. "ftPB^* i»l«H^I'0 TUI^I^'^11 nir' f^N^^ W^BT ^ty< 22. 8o far as t.he cases ofrflvised options are conceiTied, rhe petitioners ofthpse cases ar<t this faGt^ui fhe represenfatio ;^»?-^^—^. '.'^?.. dccidcd by thc Ccntral Qovt. Gleaii&that ,ii^j: ;:%?^ ~~^^^' on l/y/200f|to receive Govermnent 6n their r^res^atations. directed.to specificsdly mention |i. Their representations shall be ks directcd abovc, It is also made wlll remaln on dunr ^^t^ ttie decision of the Central 23. Cotmsel for the petitio^ interinis orders passed by lers^submitted mat pursuaiit to :his CoLirt, they have not been relieved and they are contmjuing. This statement is made at the Bor by the coi.insel f()r the petitioners and tliis is rccordcd. CoLmscl for thc StdLte SLiljmitted fhat thcv could noi venlV abour the incllviclual cjases ai-icl rlie srareiiiei^i iiiacle ai tlTP'Bar mav be recorded. It' foLuid tliar the petitioners they may be giveii liberty a}^plicatioii for modification. in some cases or r1i^ other, it is lave made incorrect statement, to make a mentioii b\ filiiig Thc 5tatcmciit5 ai'c rccoixlcd ajiul (^^ftrt XI-HC-22 fc-U^> <WI§<1 •a 17 ^/ "3^ ^i<«d^^xfl^^^ f«<n(«y sn^r 'vsfSR NINC^I <toNi€bM-^^'M ^^^"'"^gr^ ^we T^fti^qw' ^tKW ^«wi^4ift<i wqferikWffJT <1ft*4<Ru#< ^« a*i8B%<r the liherty i^llgt^en to thfr S^ate, as.prayed. Relying on the statements^imade, it is direc|^ed that if the persons are not relieved thev shall n0tl>e,i'eli^ved. In'the circumstances, it is relieyed^th^shall.ru^t^l^ 'T%pf'.:fT^I%^^lll dh-cctcd fhaf till thei^ljdecy ^;%-^ ^yg^:"' i^^". Govemmeat^^petlQilgers still coiitmuingyisl:ial|j|)e alL who have been relieved^re ^ '•-» [ioi-i is givcn by thc Ccntral to> have not been relieved and iwed to continue. So far tliose oncemed, they should mention tliis fact in their representlition and it is for tlie Central GovciTinicnt te pass suc|i ordcr which tlic Ccntral GovcnmieiiL dcems lit. II is tiiade clcaj- Uial Llie dccisioii 011 t-he rei^resentation would be fc-ommunicated to the concernecl departments, who after rece the employees concenied. Tl [ving it would communicate it To y |.e directioiis ai'e beuig issued to the respectivc dcpart.ment.sj vso that t.hc decision tAkcii is scrvcd on thc petitioncrs. 2^. In rhe oplnion of ihls <l)oun, 111s in rhe inieresr of rlie empiovees as well as the r spective Governments that tlic (^^firt / XI-HC-22 »B^rw i«n<ws^i 5b^fl^» h1^—. . -,:^;..^.^-^^^^-^.^ .-... -^^^^^^^i!^^^.^^, ,.., 18 (STf: T5? ^i^id^ ^Tli^'Ko, faw^y " >; 3n^?T 1I?(q? _ -^^lW^I^':^:::^:^^^''^':^^ 200 '•—^yyy——' %^i?iiawijBft^f ^>f<rfCT<fi<l orders are iTTiplem^nte^, al^ ^,. ' ^••%':"i persons starfwbrking, so thafe bations .are finalized and rlie entire raatter is fuialteed at tlie earlieait an<r the resp^tive p^onnel should devote time in '^''fiiiss^~'~'-'':~:'fi u^,S^ S^^ /:i .1 ' • pcrforming tfccir dir|||s;instea -. .'^^' •k i of Utigatiiig. •;'^i|^i|^|%^^g^^^ , ^.,^...... •,-,,..i,.:. .• ,^.; •,:..:, ^ - 25. It isnSa<iil|^aEi£hQ^|^i the mattcr on broad consensus lirrived at bctwccrn. thc partics and has not esq)r^sed<mw opitilc^ merins or otherwise of the case andlit is left fbf coi^idemtion crf the (^ntral Governm.ent. -< 26. With these observations /. fmallv. ' 27. Conscqucntly, M.W.P.s OI'. these petitions are disposed of Qb I.A.^, if anv, ^taiid di^po^rd assistaiice rendered by couj 28.-- Before parting, this C|)Tirt appreciates rhe valuable , Acivoc^ isel for the petitioners, Slii'i Ravindra Shrivastava liis collcagucs, aiid Shri VJv. ie Geiieral of State of C.G m-icl taiika, Advocatc Qciicral ofM.P. (^Wsr^ :iSWSSiiSsi' K^K^ ^.,^M ^»l&; XI-HC-22 an^^Ri w l^^- f^«»ti. •^ (^ ^p? m^ 19 ^o^ -<4i<(i<n<<, ^^1«4(<o, fa^wy 3n^r LO P J^^-6 c^ Nl*<^< (bHlcii ^ 200 ...4-— fa<»<i€|< ^«Aiw.^ift<i and his colleagues, Shri V «' Counsel for Union of Indid, arriving broad consensus in. Ccrtificd copy to thic mcorporation df tlie ^&^- Copy to Stsite" counsel o Union of India free of costl Goveniiiients for compliaiice. ^ctitioncrs/thcir icounscl aftci ainendm^nt,etc. if dtrected eai'lier. '^oth theiStaAesf& counsel for |br forwarding it to respecuve »iqfa<n-<WKff <l|R(«a<ftW< ^<dpTO<WhT V.S. Murthy, Addl. Standing ) L-of whora assisted the Court in i matter Uke this. /" Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^^fe^