IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2008 / 2ND MAGHA 1929 W.P(C).No. 638 of 2008(A) ------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- ING VYSYA BANK LTD., KESHEMA BUILDING, M.G.ROAD, RAVIPURAM, ERNAKULAM, REP. BY ITS MANAGER, RAMESH, S/O.VASUDEVAN, AGED 34 YEARS. BY ADV. SRI.P.FAZIL RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, TIRUR. (ADDL. REGISTERING AUTHORITY). 2. MAMMADU PANTHAKKAN, S/O.MOIDEENKUTTY, PANTHAKKAN HOUSE, P.O.EDARIKODE, MALAPPURAM DIST. 3. K.HAMSA, S/O.MOHAMMED HAJI, KUTTANKAVIL HOUSE, P.O.KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM DIST. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SRI. I.V. PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 638 OF 2008 A ===================== Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he filed an application on 4/10/2007 to the 1st respondent for issue of a fresh RC in respect of a Toyota Innova vehicle bearing registration No. KL10 W/4334. Petitioner also submits that earlier when the borrower had filed WP(C) 30948/07, that writ petition was disposed of by this court directing that in case an application is made by the petitioner herein, who was the 3rd respondent in that case, notice shall be given to the borrower and the matter shall be decided by the 1st respondent. It is submitted that in terms of the directions in the said judgment, the application made by the petitioner on 4/10/2007 was heard by the 1st respondent on different occasions with notice to the 3rd respondent, but final order has not been passed. It is in this background the writ petition has been filed. WPC 638/08 :2 : 2. If as a matter of fact the 1st respondent has received the application and heard the affected parties, there is absolutely no justification for the delay in passing final orders on the application to the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that if the 1st respondent has complied with the direction for hearing as contained in Ext.P2 judgment, final orders shall be passed on the application dated 4/10/2007. This shall be done by the 1st respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within three weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp