IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20102 of 2009 ANUP THAKUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR THRU.VIG. ----------- 3 12/08/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the Vigilance. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under sections 7, 13(2) read with sections 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. A raiding party was organized after receiving the information that this petitioner and Sudhakar Pandey were demanding bribe. The raiding party of the Vigilance caught Sudhakar Pandey with Rs. 15,000/- of bribe money whereas the petitioner was apprehended with Rs. 8,000/- of bribe money. Submission is that Sudhakar Pandey is on bail. Learned counsel for the Vigilance submits that Sudhakar Pandey has been admitted to bail on account of technical reasons. The fact remains that the person from whom more money was recovered is on bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Anup Thakur is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount 2 each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Vigilance-1, Patna in connection with Special Case No. 06 of 2009 arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No. 13 of 2009 with condition that one of the bailors shall be a public servant. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)