IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.291 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.291 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.291 OF 2006 IN IN IN REVIEW REVIEW REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.60 OF 2006 PETITION (L) NO.60 OF 2006 PETITION (L) NO.60 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.194 OF 2006 PETITION NO.194 OF 2006 PETITION NO.194 OF 2006 Union of India & Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.M.I.Sethna with Mr.A.M.Sethna for the Petitioners. Mr.Anil Wani with Mr.Mehul Shah i/b.ANS Law & Associaites for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR J.P.DEVADHAR J.P.DEVADHAR JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 23RD NOVEMBER, 2006 : 23RD NOVEMBER, 2006 : 23RD NOVEMBER, 2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion the Petitioner-Union of India is seeking condonation of 41 days delay. Perused the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Petitioner. In view thereof, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)