IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14517 of 2010 CHANDRABALI PRASAD SINGH SON OF LATE RAGHUNANDAN PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE HASANPUR, POLICE STATION TEGHRA, DISTRICT – BEGUSARAI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, DEPARTMENT OF WATE RESOURCES, AURANGABAD. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NORTH KOEL BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION, MANDAL AURANGABAD. 6. THE TREASURY OFFICER, AURANGABAD. 7. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, AURANGABAD. 8. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. ----------- 02. 01.09.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, Accountant General and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of December 2009 as Junior Engineer from the office of Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Aurangabad, no retiral dues of any nature has been paid to the petitioner including the pension of the petitioner has also not been fixed till date. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent State submits that the claims of the petitioner shall be 2 considered without delay as per law. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file separate representations one before the respondent no. 5 and another before the respondent no. 7 with regard to the claim for provident funds dues. In view of the above, in case such representations stating details of unpaid claims are filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representations in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)