1 crap461.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 461 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 460 OF 2010 Kavita w/o Vishwambhar Wadve ...Applicant VERSUS Rameshwar s/o Namdeo Wadve & anr. ...Respondents ..... Shri N.L.Jadhav, advocate for applicant Shri A.D.Sugdare, advocate for respondent no.1 Respondent no. 2 abated as per Court’s order, dt. 20.4.11 ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 6 th June, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Heard Shri N.L.Jadhav, advocate for applicant and Shri A.D.Sugdare, advocate for respondent no.1. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 36 days caused in filing the accompanying 2 crap461.10 Criminal Application seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 3.10.2009, passed by the learned 11 th Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Aurangabad, in R.C.C. No. 1234 of 2007. 3 For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and it further appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying application is not willful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 Hence, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 36 days caused in filing the accompanying application seeking leave to file appeal stands condoned and present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap461.10