:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.537 OF 2007 IN F.A.NO.505 OF 1995 Tarabai M. Mujawar and ors. ..Applicants. Vs. Raghunath Shankar Kelkar. ..Respondent. Mr. Vineet B. Naik for the Applicants. Respondent in person. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 11th June,2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This application is filed in the year 2007 in an appeal which is pending since 1995. This application is filed under the provisions of Section 20 Rule-5 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The applicants seek leave of the Court to file additional documents as under. 1. Copy of order passed in W.P.No.7771/1981. 2. Copy of C.M.P.No.2200/1982 in W.P.No.7771/1981. 3. Copy of order dated 7.5.1982, 5.5.1983 and 29.10.1987 said to have been passed in various writ petitions. 2. On behalf of the applicants, the learned counsel states that the application is being pressed under Order :2: 41 Rule 27 (aa) of the C.P.C. In the alternative, it is also contended that the court should consider the application under Order 41 Rule 27(b). In my view, since the documents sought to be produced pertain to court orders and since submissions were made that these documents would have a bearing and would be relevant for deciding the first appeal, all though there appears to be no due diligence on the part of the appellants and though application is filed at belated stage, I am inclined to allow the civil application in order to refer to the contents of the various orders passed by the Apex Court. Civil Application is therefore allowed. The documents annexed to the civil application will form a part of evidence and will be dealt with in my judgment and order. Civil Application stands disposed off. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)