IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No. 3382 of 2008 Date of decision : September 21, 2010 Raj Kumar and another ....Appellants versus Gurbachan Singh and another ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. CM Munjal, Advocate, for the appellants Mr. PPS Duggal, Advocate, for respondent no. 1 Respondent no. 2 ex parte. Appellant no. 1 and respondent no. 1 also in person. L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) With the intervention of the Court, appellants and respondent no. 1 have effected compromise. Joint statement regarding compromise has been recorded separately and is reproduced herein-under:- “Stated that the parties have effected compromise with the intervention of the Court in terms of section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure. According to compromise, defendant respondent no. 1 shall within two months pay Rs 10,000/- by way of bank draft to plaintiff-appellant no. 1 or in case of refusal by plaintiff-appellant no. 1, by deposit in the trial court, to compensate appellants towards cost of litigation. Respondent no. 1 also tenders unconditional apology to the appellants. Consequently, claim of the plaintiff-appellants stands fully satisfied. In view thereof, the appeal may be Regular Second Appeal No. 3382 of 2008 -2- disposed of accordingly. However, if the amount of Rs 10,000/- is not paid within two months as stipulated, appellants shall have a right to recover Rs 25,000/- from respondent no. 1. Court fee paid in the instant appeal be refunded to the appellants in view of section 16 of the Court Fees Act. The appeal be decided accordingly.” The case has, thus, been lawfully compromised. In view of compromise, the instant second appeal is disposed of in terms of the above statement. Court fee paid on the instant appeal is ordered to be refunded to the appellants. ( L.N. Mittal ) September 21, 2010 Judge 'dalbir'