IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1431 of 2009. Date of decision: 21.5.2010. Bhushan Kumar ….. Petitioner Vs. State of H.P. and others …. Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi,Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.K. Sharma, Addl. Advocate General with Mrs. Shubh Mahajan, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. Kuldip Singh, J (Oral) The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the grievance of the petitioner in the petition is that in pursuance of order dated 24.9.2008 Annexure P-4 the service of the petitioner was terminated vide order dated 27.10.2008 Annexure P-5. It has been submitted that the question raised by the petitioner in the petition is covered by judgment dated 18.3.2010 passed by the Division Bench in CWP No. 1133 of 2009 alongwith connected matters. The order passed by the Division Bench on 18.3.2010 is as follows:- “ The issue raised in these writ petitions pertains to the selection and appointment of teachers by the Parents Teacher Association. Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes The learned counsel appearing on both sides point that the Director, Higher Education, Himachal Pradesh has issued a communication dated 24th September, 2009 and the case requires fresh consideration in the light of the said communication. The relevant portion of the communication of the Director, Higher Education, Himachal Pradesh reads as follows:- Refer to letter No. EDN-Kha(7)3706-1 dated 3.9.2009 from the Principal Secretary (Education) to the Govt. of Himachal Pradesh to this directorate and copy endorsed to you and others vide which the Government has asked to move an application immediate before the Chairman of the concerned enquiry committee in view of the decision of CWP No. 525/2009 titled as Ravinder Singh vs. State and CWP No. 2632/2009 titled as Koyal Kumar Vs. State wherein the Hon’ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh while setting aside the orders of the committee has directed that Committee after giving adequate opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the other respondents can look into the matter and decide whether the appointment of the petitioner was valid or not. The committee while deciding the issue will keep into consideration the observation of the Hon’ble High Court made in CWPs. The copy of the judgement/orders passed by the Hon’ble High Court in CWP No. 2632/2009 titled as Koyal Kumar Vs. State is also being sent to all the Deputy Directors. Therefore, you are directed to comply with the directions of the Government and take action in the matter accordingly.” In view of the above clarification issued by the Director of Higher Education, Himachal Pradesh, the impugned orders are liable to be set aside. Ordered accordingly. However, we make it clear that it will be open to the Enquiry Committee to consider the matters afresh in the light of the instruction referred to above. The needful, if required, shall be done within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment by either side. It is also made clear that in the cases of those teachers who are working in the schools, in case they have not been paid their due wages, the same shall be paid and the State shall ensure that the required grant-in-aid is given to the Schools, as per the Rules forthwith.” 2. The learned Addl. Advocate General has not denied the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner that grievance raised by the petitioner in the present petition is covered by the order dated 18.3.2010, rather he has submitted that the question raised by the petitioner is covered by order dated 18.3.2010. In these circumstances, the petition is allowed on the terms indicated above in order dated 18.3.2010 in CWP No. 1133 of 2009. Let a copy of order dated 18.3.2010 passed in CWP No. 1133 of 2009 be placed on record. The petition stands disposed of. CMP No. 2630 of 2009 3. Infructuous in view of disposal of the main petition. May 21, 2010(sks) ( Kuldip Singh ) Judge.