•/. :-fuk- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO. G.3X3. /2006 US~!9 B; aE'Mfai WiaLt StWul PETITIONER ^ '^ '&aW' &...-"<^"^ , >^-!-^'\/sy--v"'\ ...^ss^-^' •"^^^---"" ^•::^c^i^ ^^yy-i'''" RESPONDENTS T.S.Chaturvedi, S/o. Shiv Prasad Chaturvedi, aged about 50 years^-R/0. Sonakhan, Tah. (Kasdol) Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department ofForest, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Mantralaya, Raipur ( C.G.) 2. The Principal Chief . Conservator of Forest, Jail Road, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Conservator of Forest, ^ JaH Road, Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Divisional Forest OfiBcer, ^ Forest Range, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 3^ •^wlci<<, aiTflti'iio, isiciiwy 311^1 >4^eh iirayn'awN?'' ''••—'•"—• •^q- 200^ 3:n^r?iT R-fi+sn^r ^ it>Nlt>« 3)1^1 ^•wiw'Rfer *iiify'i(l.( »iiiidTfffei<!l <,R|<<K 'R'S^T-W^T '^l'. 11-7-2 Mr. Anand Kumar Tiwari, cour|sel for the petitioner. Mr. Sumesh 6<yaj, 6ovt. ^dvocate fof the StQte/respondents, on advance copy. Heard both the counsei. 8y this writ petitton under Af-ticie 226 of the Constitution of India, the pstitroner has cholienged his tranfffl been transferred froni Sonakhan, er order dated 3-7-2006 whereby he has Forest Range: Raipur, District! Raipur to West Pandariya, Forest Kange: Ki^wardha, District! Kabirdhaw. The main ground for chaiierige js thnt as pej- ctause 2 sub-clause (2) of the transfer poiicy dated 26-5-2006 (Annexur^ necessit/, it shouid be minimum in i| P-2), transfef' should be made oniy in umbsr' and that an empioyee who has not compieted three yews of ser-vic^ at one piace should not nor'rnally be tt'ansferi'ed, whsreas, the petition^ months in the present place of posti] Learnsd couns&i for the pets] r has completed ori'ty about one yeor nine V- Moner submits that the petitioner may be aliowed to make a representation tiji respondent No.l and respondent No.l be dir-ected to dacide the same to whij respondents hcs no objection. Havin9 hsard learned counse facts and circumstsnces of the cose\ the case, ths prayer made by learn«j just, fair and r-easombie. Thei'e-f^ detoiied "epresentation to responde] :h iearned Sovt. Advocate for the State/ for the parties and having regard to the without expressing cny opinion on i-Berit of d counsel for the petitioner appears to be ore, tha petitioner- is aiiowed to make ei nt No.l annexing a copy of the instant writ (tftty^) XI-HC-22 'sst -!<I<{KI<I, aTfly'is, Isicfiyy _6l:)^S3>?~&/ *iiHnisn*<i<»i""""""""""""^P( Ri^ sn^TW R-ii+sn^r ^3 Sh*< (I tfc. Soma ^ ^^// <1 ^ A w^fti gwiw;8fer arU petition within 10 doys from todoy representstion of the pstitioner wit^in in an objective manner, in cccordance| With the direction aforesoid, Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.257| Parties ars entitled for certified in turn, respondent No.l sheil decide the jin one month from the date of its receipt, w'th law. I'he petition stands disposed of. J6/2006 also stands disposed of. copy of this order. ':ni<iFCT<n-i iitif]T^'te^<Ri'wi< ^g1^IT3n^?T Sd<- L.C. Bhsdso Judge (•fl^y^)