AB 4043/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. MUSAHARY Heard Mr. R. Islam, learned counsel for the accused petitioners. Also heard Mr. B.S. Sinha, learned Additional P.P., Assam, who has produced the case diary, as called for, in connection with Golakganj P.S. Case No. 534/2011 registered u/s 366(A)/34 IPC. On perusal of the case diary it is found that the accused petiti oner No. 1 and the petitioner No. 2 are father and maternal uncle of the boy wh o has allegedly eloped the victim girl. On reading the case diary, I do not find any role played by the present accused petitioners in committing the alleged of fence u/s 366(A) IPC. In view of the above, it is directed that the accused petitioners, namely , Shri Monindra Barman and Mriganka Mohan Roy @ Mrinal Kanti Roy @ Kani Roy, who are apprehending arrest in connection with the aforesaid case, shall be allowed to go on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- each with one local su rety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority and on conditions prescribed under Section 438(2) CrPC. Further they are directed to appear before the I/O concerned within a period of 10 (ten) days from today for the purpose of investigation and recording their statement in accordance with l aw. Bail application stands disposed of.