IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETIITON NO. 2272 OF 2007 CRIMINAL WRIT PETIITON NO. 2272 OF 2007 CRIMINAL WRIT PETIITON NO. 2272 OF 2007 alongwith alongwith alongwith WRIT PETIITON NO.2273 OF 2007 WRIT PETIITON NO.2273 OF 2007 WRIT PETIITON NO.2273 OF 2007 Mukku Tirupati Reddy .... Petitioner versus Mukesh Umedlal Gandhi & anr....... Respondent. Mr. A.Z.Mookhtiar for the petitioner Mr. V.M.Vaghela for Respondent no.1. Mr. P.A. Pol APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 13TH DECEMBER, 2007 DATED; 13TH DECEMBER, 2007 DATED; 13TH DECEMBER, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The Writ Petitioners are the original accused against whom a complaint has been filed by the respondent no.1 under section 138 of N.I.Act. The case is pending on the file of 8th Jt. Judicial Magistrate First Class at Thane. The parties to the writ petitions have settled the dispute out of Court. Under the settlement the respondent complaint has been paid the amount by the applicant/accused. The Minutes of the Order are placed on record with a prayer to compound the offence by having recourse to section 147 of N.I.Act, which is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. Both the learned advocates appearing for respective parties urged for disposal of the writ petitions in terms of Minutes of Order. Writ Petitions are disposed of in terms of Minutes of Order. ....