Civil Revision No.6237 of 2010 -: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6237 of 2010 Date of decision: October 08, 2010. A.K. Malhotra ...Petitioner(s) v. Mrs. Ruby Singh & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Shri Rajneesh , Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Shri H.S. Grewal, Advocate, for the respondents. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia , J. (Oral): On 27.9.2010, this Court had passed the following order:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the tenant had deposited the provisional rent before the Rent Controller, Chandigarh for the period form 1.4.2002 to 30.4.2006 at the rate of Rs.2,500/- per month. He has referred to the finding recorded by the Rent Controller qua issue No.2, wherein it was stated that the rent has been paid upto May 2005 and the tenant is not in arrears of rent. He further contends that the petitioner has paid a sum of Rs.1,36,000/- in excess towards rent and the same is liable to be adjusted. He further contends that he will not contest the mesne profits, as determined by the Appellate Authority, Chandigarh, but only prays that the amount, so paid in excess, be adjusted. Issue notice of motion for 8.10.2010. Process dasti. In the meantime, deposit of the mesne profits, as determined by the Appellate Authority, be kept in abeyance.” Civil Revision No.6237 of 2010 -: 2 :- Counsel for the respondents has very fairly stated that as to whether a sum of Rs.1,36,000/- is paid in excess or not, may be determined by the Appellate Authority during the course of arguments. He further states that the Appellate Authority be directed to decide the appeal within a stipulated period. The offer made by counsel for the respondents is very fair. Therefore, the Appellate Authority is directed to also decide as to whether a sum of Rs.1,36,000/- was paid in excess towards rent or not, and whether the same is liable to be adjusted or not. The Appellate Authority shall decide the appeal within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The petition stands disposed of. [Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] October 08, 2010. Judge kadyan