IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13383 of 2011 Most.Usha Devi & Ors Versus Kanhai Lal Paswan & Ors ---------------------------------- 03. 06.09.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the plaintiff- petitioner against the order dated 07.07.2011 passed by Munsif, Danapur in Title Suit No.11 of 1997 whereby the learned Court below permitted the defendants-respondents to mark some documents as exhibit and permitted him to examine formal witnesses only. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below found that although the case was fixed for hearing the documents filed by the respondent could not be marked as exhibit in the case and the documents are necessary for proper adjudication of the case and, therefore, allowed the application granting cost of Rs.100/- payable by the respondent to the petitioner. In such view of matter, it cannot be said that order passed by the Court below is not within the bounds of its authority. I, therefore, find no merit in this writ application and accordingly, it is dismissed. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)