1\-* *ji3;;l (•' HK3HCOURT OF CHH*TTISeAI»1AT BILASPUR Singte Bench : Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J Cr. M.P. No. ^48008 PETITIONER Raju Khan S/o Shri Gani Khan, agaj about 40 years, r/o Champa, Poltee StaBon Champa.Distrtet Janjgir Champa (CG). RESPONDENTS Versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Threugh District M^tetrate," Kstrict Jaryglr Champa, (Chhattisgarh) 2. TheSub DivisionalMagistrate.Chanpa, District, Janjgir Charopa (CG) 3. The Superintendent of Polfce, Di^rict Janjgir Champa (CG) 4. The Station House OTRcer, Distrtct Janjgir Champa (CG) Mr. Shailendra Soni counsel fw the pedUoner. Mr. SanajivAgrawal PLfortheresponderibState. !BI PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CR.P.C. ORALORDER (Passedon 27.6.2008) This peBBon is directed again^ the order pasaed ty Sub Dwisional Magistrate in criminal Case No. 1-W/2007 dtreiaingfor initiatun of proceedings uneter section 110 of the Codeof erimlrat Preeedure. 2. The order is chaltenged on the ground that the leamed Sub Dh/istonal Magistrate has not passed Uie order to hfe subjecUve satisfactton and it is just a cyelostyted order. No case t»s bean registered against th®peUttoner after 20SS2 and he is not invohwd in wy offsncs. 3. Heard eoui»elforthe parties and perused the ordar imptgnecfc 4. It is argued on behalf of the peUtfoner ttart prima facie ttiere ie no ground for iniBaUng the proceedings under ^^Uon 110^ of ttte Cr.P.C. againstthepetiltoner. TheorderpassedundersecBon111 oftheCr.P.C. ili^t^.t^i^it f EtEgs —T—..-.*"BBMI?'S1 -^. fc-^' ^' "^^y '^ is a cyclo^yled order and it has been passed without subjeetive satisfectton ofthe Sub Dhrisional Magishate. 5. On the rther hand, ttie erdw impugned is supported on behalf of the respondents/State. 6. In thepresent case, the petNior»rhas n<rt filed any reply befere the trial Court. The order impugned is tn prescribed fonn but the ingredients of the <rffence are to the ssrtisfactton of ttie leamed Magistrate. It appears from the copy of the documente filed wi bebalf ct the petitioner that so many criminal cases are regirtered and pending against ttie petitioner and the leamed Magistrate has direeted for initiaBon of the proceedings against the petWoner in the Ught of secSon 110 (g) ofthe Code ofCnminal Procedure. 7. Thus 1 do not find any ground fbr kiterferencft in ttie order impugned in exereise of ttie inherent jurisdteAron of this Court. Accordingly, the peBUon belng wthout siAslanee te^ Uabla to be dismissed and it Is herety dismissad at the admission stage itself. Sd/- T. P. Sharma Judge "^i