-: 1 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1616 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO. 3246 OF 1996 Leelavati Mondas Mehta & Anr. ..Plaintiffs. Versus Carrier Aircon Ltd & Ors. ..Defendants. And Damyanti D. Vora & Anr. ..Respondents. Ms. Purnima Bhatai for the plaintiff. Mr. N. Lohire i/b M/s. Udeshi & Co., for defendant no.1. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : February 23, 2010. P. C. : 1. This chamber summons is taken out by plaintiff no.2 for brining the legal heirs of the deceased plaintiff no.1 on record. Chamber summons is not opposed by defendant no.1. Other defendants though served, none appears on their behalf. In that view of the matter chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (d). The plaintiff shall carry out necessary amendment within the period of two weeks from today and thereafter within the period of two weeks shall serve the amended copy of plaint on all concerned. (R.V. MORE, J.) -: 2 :- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 3246 OF 1996 Leelavati Mondas Mehta & Anr. ..Plaintiffs. Versus Carrier Aircon Ltd & Ors. ..Defendants. Ms. Purnima Bhatai for the plaintiff. Mr. N. Lohire i/b M/s. Udeshi & Co., for defendant no.1. Coram : R. V. MORE, J. Date : February 23, 2010. P. C. : 1. Learned counsel for defendant no.1 seeks permission to file written statement. The suit is filed in the year 1996. It is stated that defendant no.1 came to know about the present suit only when chamber summons no. 1616 of 2007 was served upon them in the month of July 2008. The plaintiff has not disputed this contention. In that view of the matter, defendant no.1 is granted permission to file written statement in the suit. Defendant no.1 shall file its written statement within the period of one week from today. (R.V. MORE, J.)