IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-11780 of 2010 Date of Decision: 23.04.2010 M/s Hari Om Yarns Pvt. Ltd. ....Petitioner Versus Rohit Verma ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Manuj Nagrath, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for seeking direction to the trial Court to decide the complaint case under the provisions of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act read with Section 420 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the prosecution evidence was closed on 11.11.2009. Thereafter, the complainant absented himself on 14.11.2009. He finally appeared before the Court on 29.01.2010. The matter is being adjourned for defence evidence from time to time. However, the time was granted at least five times but on each occasion, no defence witness was present. It is stated that the matter is still being adjourned. The complaint is of dated 09.01.2006. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court that the trial be expedited and the complaint shall be decided within six months from the next date of hearing. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 23.04.2010 JUDGE gurpreet