^^8^;:^ ^."^:3^""" 1 ^ »•<» P<BS;"....---"""" r^ (• A^-"'"" IN THE HI6H COURT O^JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.;^^ of 2009 PETITIONER RESPON&ENTS vs Jawahar Lal Sisodia, son of Shri Anar Singh Sisodia, aged 36 years, Occupation-Service, Posted as Sub-Inspector at Police Chowki Chendra, P.5. Jhilmili, Surajpur, District Surguja (C6) 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Ministry of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. 2. The D:i.-yector Seneral of A-^ Police, Chhattisgarh, P'c.Uc-e. K&a-ff) <S\t«-a+ey ^^ Raipur.Qc-,^.) 3 Th'e Superintendent of Poli'^e^, Police^ [)istrict-Sur<yp.yy (c • <sr) Ps"'§>' WRIT PETITION UN&ER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA + -HC—78 sm^ ^i fi(-<i* 'cTt?T 3T1^ fl>H)ch r iu '3^ "4i<4ici<i, ®Tily'is,Isifii'yy ^.J^:.£.-....C^)..'2^^%/... tTOwa?*iw"'"'~"""""'""""'"/ SiI^I '^^Fl ('^li^^tT) 1 TOnw^ifc! 3ii^i Is.^S^'FSkS'?^'? W C&SJOV .'!J¥T<,S?Tl¥^.:E?. 03.07.2009 Shri Indrasen Sahu, counstl for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, P.Lj Chailenge in the present p^ (Annexure'P/1) passed by the Di|i-ector General of Police, Raipur by which the petitioner has been tiiansferred from District Surguja to District Narayanpur. Contention of counsel lor tbe petitioner is that he has already remained in the naxalite affected ^ovemment, he cannot be again i] a Ufe fhreat for him and this factl poiice authorities but yet the petit! Learned counsel for the g permitted to withdraw the pre, representation to the resoondent' and related documents. He furth! issued to the respondents for ^ stipulated time frame. x^ccordingly, the 'petition i^ aforesaid Uberty. In the eyentuaii cfti^l?fifri Ttn^ff "^ "fe^ <F*i'^T< 7J?l¥^T^/'^r-a "ntT^icyAi?" for the State. • tition is to the order dated 4.6.2009 area and as per the oolicv of the sosted in the said area. T'he further contention is that when he was otisted in the naxalite area there was is also within the Ktiowledee of the ioner has been transferred. ictitioner submits thai he may be ^ent petition with Ubertv to file ^ along with the copy of this order ;r submitg that a direction mav be ieciding, his representation within dismissed as withdrawn with the ty of the petitioners making such representation within ten days i'rAm the date of receipt. ol this order, the saiTie would be decided by ttje authorities within a period of 15 days from the date of its receiDt] circumstances of the case incl after considering all the lacts and uding ail the grievances of the petitioner. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge v