SSK/58 1 cp.473.10. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.473 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3036 OF 2010 Shashikant Shivaputrappa Chhapre ....Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. D. W. Bhosale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A. I. Patel, AGP for respondents. CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 25th MARCH, 2011. P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGP for the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that in terms of Order dated 30th April, 2010 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.3036 of 2010, the respondents have not considered the petitioner’s representation. 3. On behalf of respondents, affidavit of one Seema Yeshwant Ukarde, Deputy Secretary to the Government, School Education and SSK/58 2 cp.473.10. Sports Department, Mantralaya is filed. In para 5 of the said affidavit, a statement is made that the petitioner’s representation is considered and decision is taken by the Government by its Order dated 15th November, 2010 and petitioner is also informed accordingly. A copy of the decision is annexed at Exhibit “I” to the affidavit in reply. 4. In the above circumstances, the petitioner’s grievance no more survives. The petitioner is always at liberty to challenge the above said decision, if the same is adverse against his interest. With the above observations, the petition is disposed of. (RANJIT MORE, J.)