AB 3351/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Biswas, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Sinha, lear ned PP, Assam. The applicants, namely (i) Md. Harunar Rashid; (2) Mrs. Farida Begum; (3 ) Sayed Ali @ Md. Saydur Rahman and (4) Mrs. Merina Begum, are seeking the privi lege of pre-arrest bail under Section 438 Cr. P.C. apprehending arrest in connec tion with CR Case No.1908/2011 registered under Sections 498(A)/ 120(B)/307/34 I PC. I have perused the case diary, as produced by Mr. Sinha, learned PP. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the materials available in the case diary, I am of the view that the privilege of p re-arrest bail, keeping in view the interest of the investigation, cannot be gra nted to the applicant No.1, Md. Harunar Rashid. However, the privilege of pre - arrest bail is granted to the applicant Nos.2, 3 and 4, namely Mrs. Farida Begum ; Sayed Ali @ Md. Saydur Rahman and Mrs. Merina Begum and hence the order of int erim bail passed on 28th October, 2011 in respect of those 3 (three) applicants is made absolute with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. (ii) They shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promi se to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against them so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office r. (iii) They shall not leave the district of Morigaon without the written permissi on of the learned CJM, Morigaon. The bail application is accordingly disposed of.