THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH W.P.No. 14470 of 2007 ORAL ORDER: (per T. Meena Kumari, J) The Writ Petition is filed seeking to quash the orders passed by the learned A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad passed in O.A.No.747 of 2006 dated 7.6.2007. Brief facts of the case are: Petitioner herein is the applicant and the Respondents herein are the Respondents before the tribunal. For the purpose of convenience, the parties as arrayed before the tribunal are referred to hereinafter. Applicant has filed O.A.No. 747 of 2006 before the learned A.P. Administrative Tribunal seeking to quash the proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent in Proc. Rc.No. P5/452/2006, dated 1.2.2006. After hearing the parties, the learned tribunal has passed a common judgment in this O.A. along with O.A.No.743 of 2006 and Batch dated 7.6.2007 in brief as follows: “The issue involved in this batch of O.As. has already been decided in O.A.No.717 of 2006 dated 4.5.2007. Following the same, these O.As. are also dismissed in terms of the orders contained in O.A.No. 717 of 2006, dated 4.5.2007. VMAs are allowed and the C.As. are closed accordingly.” Heard both sides. We have perused the records. In view of the fact that a controversy arises in this Writ Petition, the petitioner has already been absorbed in Panchayat Raj Department and according to the learned Government Pleader the said absorption orders are kept in abeyance, the petitioner is given liberty to make appropriate representation to the respondents to consider his case and the petitioner shall be given liberty to make appropriate representation to the respondents to consider his case. Under these circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of and the petitioner is given liberty to make appropriate representation to the respondents to consider his case within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and as and when such representation is made, the same should be considered by the respondents in accordance with the rules within a period of four weeks thereafter. Till such time, the petitioner shall be continued. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. __________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J ________________ G. CHANDRAIAH, J 10.7.2007 CHV