IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ~ (c.G.) givision Bench .No a?! [2005 Laxmania Wd/o. Shivnarayan CN LAIMATS : 1 . ” Aged 32 years Ku. Jagmania D/o. Late Shivnarayan aged about 19 years Shiv Pratap S/oLate Shivnarayan Aged about 18 years Minor Sachin Pratap Singh S/o late Shivnarayan aged about 15 years, Minor Jaisingh S/o Late Shivnarayan, aged‘about 12 years Minor Ku. Babli D/o Late Shivnarayan, aged about 8 Years,> No.4 to 6 are Minors Through Natural Guardian Mother Laxmania Appellant no. A11 R/o. Village Devnagar, P.S. 85 Tahsil Surajpur, District Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS ' 'Dashrath Prasad @ Chhotelal ' Gupta, S/o. Rameshwar Prasad Aged 45 years, Occupation Business, (Vehicle Owner) R/o. Vill. Devnagar, P.S. 85 Tahsil ' Surajpur Distt. Sarguja (C.G. ) \c» 4> \ : RESPONDENTS Owner an l(; 451 M.A APPELLANTS I 1 é? ® (2) Driver KI; 2. Ritupal'S/o Motiram Yadav / Aged about 3O years, Occupation Dfiver, R/o Village P.S. Ramanujnagar, Narayanpur, Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Sarguja (c.G.) The Oriental Insurence Co.Ltd. (/(V Through Branch Office Banaraé Manendragarh RO ad, ( Chowk) , Ambikapur , Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) Rs.23;4o,ooO/- ‘,/ Rs. 15/— Rs. 2“,5/9,600/- Claims before the Tribunal Court fee paid Awarded amount Same in the present appeal. MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL U/ g73 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE Aer, 1988 M 4 A—AQL LOK ADALA‘T Chhattisgarh High Court Campus, Bi‘aspu Mn- 441 Case No. of .3 am? ; WLMoy/wa 5 0913“ AppeHant/s Versus (”Respondent/s W M Q (WW’GWLA $c? am , ; fHQc/{W Appellantw‘LthJ by Shri 0 N‘ fAWAI/L‘ 5 “W4 Advocate Respondent w.th / by SW14 f K_ Jada/a MbwA/m £30, gawa, WW geld ME» AM}: mca/w, \ AWARD ’ (Passedon O¥rxo~2aroa ) 9/: ner 4w MdLlcW JM cg WQMCMM uv.{/ (A LQLLQJ W ‘ WMaM I” Lugii fw/ I“ MAW b ‘1 . (II - Sumi Kumar Sinha Judge aria: itijsrme Mimi Ktmiar Sanka Member tor Adaiat High Court of Chifattisgarh BitASPUR Parties file a compromise petition The term are just. We hereby \:\ :1. record the compromise and pass an award In 1 terms of compromise and order that appeiiant—/ respondent shall pay respondent / appellantya sum of Rs £092! MA M’Wby way of compensation tOgaha—wWst C} Wu“ anew”. fw... 7 (£4: ’- [A7 , MWM" QAéw/Lai aim W Amine/fab \v\’2’ao z «tame-er » mtg Adan? Htah Courtof Pbnattisoarh BiLASPUf—t r s 3 }