IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Revision No. 497 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:- 27.09.2011 Anju ....Petitioner Vs. Sonu and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present:- Mr. H.P.S. Raja, Advocate, for Mr. K.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana, for respondent No.2-State. ***** A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) The judgment of acquittal dated 22.09.2010 passed by the Sessions Judge, Kaithal, acquitting the accused of the charges framed against him under Sections 342, 506 and 376 IPC, has been challenged by the complainant/victim by way of this revision petition. The State has not filed any appeal. Even otherwise, as per proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C., a victim has a right to file appeal against the judgment of acquittal. Therefore, this revision petition being not maintainable, is hereby dismissed. (A.N.JINDAL) 27.09.2011 JUDGE ajp