1 S.B.CIVIL REVIEW PETITION NO.27/2007 IN S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3210/2002 (Smt.Fariya Vs. State of Raj.& Anr.) Date of Order : : 18/09/2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr.P.R.Singh, for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Ladrecha, Government Counsel. BY the instant review petition, the petitioner submits that petitioner filed a writ petition being S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3210/2002 stating therein that the petitioner passed Adib from Jamiya Urdu Aligarh University. However, in the judgment rendered by this Court dated 11th August, 2005 in the writ petition, qualification of the petitioner has been mentioned as Abid Mahir whereas the petitioner qualified only with Adib and expression Mahir has been mentioned in the order. The petitioner had not passed Adib Mahir but only passed Abid and to this extent the petitioner seeks review of the order dated 11th August, 2005. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Carefully gone through the order dated 11th August, 2005 as also the writ petition. In para 3 of the writ petition, the petitioner pleaded that the petitioner passed Adib from Jamiya 2 Urdu Aligarh. He has annexed Annexure-2 though in Urdu but Hindi version has also been placed on record showing the qualification of Adib. It is not the case of the petitioner in whole of the writ petition that the petitioner acquired the qualification of Adib Mahir and the case of the petitioner is that she acquired qualification of Adib. As per Annexure-5 Adib is said to be equivalent to High School whereas Adib Mahir equivalent to intermediate. Be that as it may, since it was the case of the petitioner that she acquired qualification of Adib only and the expression Mahir has wrongly been mentioned in order dated 11th August, 2005, therefore, in my view, it would be proper to clarify that in the order dated 11th August, 2005 passed in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3210/2002 wherever the word “Mahir” expression appears stands deleted. It is made clear that in the writ petition decided by this Court on 11th August, 2005, the qualification which the petitioner is possessing is only Abid. The review petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. NK