( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4446 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.4446 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.4446 OF 2004 Rajendra Dinkar Chavan .. Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.Uday Warunjikar for the Petitioner. Mrs.S.S.Bhende, AGP for the Respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I.REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I.REBELLO, & S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. S.P.KUKDAY, JJ. DATE : 01.04.2005. DATE : 01.04.2005. DATE : 01.04.2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that he had filed various documents before the previous Committee and the subsequent Committee did not considered the documents filed before the previous Committee and consequently, the impugned order is liable to be set aside on that count alone. 3. We had passed an order on 11.3.2005 directing the Respondents to produce the file. Today, when the matter is called out, on behalf of the Respondents, the learned AGP makes a statement that the impugned order can be set aside and the matter can be remanded back for reconsideration. In the light of that, the following order:- ( 2 ) Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Matter is referred back to the Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Pune, to reconsider the case of the petitioner by considering all the documents filed including the 53 documents placed before the previous Committee by calling for the records, and to hear the petitioner and thereafter pass appropriate orders in terms of the law. 4. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (S.P.KUKDAY, J.) (S.P.KUKDAY, J.) (S.P.KUKDAY, J.)