y-: ^SKGl.f ' ^PK irVl^t^.^ . S^'^..^^'^ ^/is7<®°2-/ © IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT^ILASPUR CHHATTISCARH W.P. (S) No. ^a'i'a /_2006 PETITIONER \^^.- '.••" .^••"> ..••" •Qg;>" s' ^•'••^' .-^•.'.^ ^-" Smt. Mridula Jofar, W/o. Shri Anupam Kumar Jofar, aged about 41 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Narhardev Hr. Sec. School- Kanker, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS State ofChhattisgarh & Others Through- The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G-) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Distt. - Kanker (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUiTABLE DIRECTION ETC TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER, Za^-A XI-HC-78 +lt*I<»tt Sh*(l<*> ^<nwgf?(r3ii^T . Anil Singh Rajput, COL iss Sunita Jain, Pone! !u ^'^lr, 4-1 matter- is heard finally and disp passed separateiy. ^ g^ •<<i<<ici<<, axflu'Ko, . U},f.W^i>^^^^; 200^ 311^1 weh (yt^siqfl) •he consent of lear^ied counsel for the parties, the Order dictated inopen £]ourt in W.P. (s) No. 7096/2006, i»>l<<I<1<fl-l H11dTfffetA<R]*<l< ^sri^iTsn^T insel for the petitioners. «yerfor the respondents/Stcte. sed of. Sd/- Satish K. A^uhotri Judge P.T.O. :^ HIW^OyRTOFj;HHATT!S6ARHATBII.ASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. -46NIHOTRI. J_, W. P. (s) No. 7096 of Z006 Petitioner Awadhesh Kumar Pandey versus Respondents 5tate of Chhattisgarh and others W P fa.) N0. 7097 of 2006 Petitioner Smt. Radheswari Patel versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh and others W P (s.) N0. 7098 of 2006 Petitioner Smt. Mridula Jofar versus ReSDoncfents State of Chhatfisgarh and others W P (s.) N0. 7099 of 2006 Petitioner Akhiiesh Kumar Singh versus ftespondents State of ChhattiS9arti and others a Petitioner Respondents W P fa.) N0. 7100 of 2006 Risabh Kumar Jain versus State of Chhattisgarh ond others 9 Petitioner Resgpndents W P fa.l N0. 7101 of 2006 Smt. Anjali Mehra versus State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner Respondents W P (s.) N0. 7102 of 2006 ©opal&ewan9an yersus State of Chhattisgarh and others Petitioner Respondents And W P (s.) N0. 7103 of 2006 Nakul Singh Netam versus State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Anil Singh Rajput, counsel for the petitioners Miss Sunita Jain, Panel lawyer for the State/respondents. "^^^, i^^a^ OR &ER •>th yassed on this 20Tn day of becember, 2006) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for- the petitioners as also for the State/respondents jointly submit -Hiat the facts and question of law involved in -the present writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Ytishwant Kwnar Bharadwaj vs. Mwiicipal Corporation, Durg and anothei^. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Ya^iwant Kumar fi^o/W(/tfq/(Supra), subjsct to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioners have acquired S.Ed./B.T.I. Certifica-tes at their own expenses as per the circulors dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and fur-rtier whetiier -they have been paid two advonce increments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on •fhe record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K.Agmlitotri Judge 1 2006(T[)MPJft-C696 Scbh