IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19820 of 2011 Sandip Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. ----------- 03/- 27/07/2011 Heard Mr. Dhananjay Kumar learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Mr. Lalan Kumar learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is named accused in this complaint case being husband of the complainant with some allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. besides having sweet relationship with another. During course of argument, it is submitted from the Bar that the couple, who were blessed with three children still intends to resume and continue their marital life. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on the event of filing an application before the court below stating such intention or filing of a compromise petition stating intentions of both sides, the court below shall permit the parties to go and reside with each other and have watch over their conduct for a reasonable period and only after being satisfied by their conduct pass appropriate order in accordance with law, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, petitioner, namely, Sandip Paswan, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, (West) Muzaffarpur, in connection with Complaint Case No. 447 of 2010, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with 2 additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)