:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.412 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.412 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.412 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L)NO.56 OF 2006 (L)NO.56 OF 2006 (L)NO.56 OF 2006 IN IN IN NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3892 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO.3892 OF 2005 OF MOTION NO.3892 OF 2005 IN IN IN ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.338 OF 2001 PETITION NO.338 OF 2001 PETITION NO.338 OF 2001 Ali-Hussain Kanchwala & Anr. ..Appellants Vs. Pratap K.Thakkar/Sejpal & Another ..Respondents Vs. Rajendra D.Shah & Ors. ..Respondents Ms.Sunita Maurya i/b.S.B.Amin for the Appellants. None for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. V.MOHTA,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 : 19TH NOVEMBER,2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellants. None appears for the Respondents though served. The learned Counsel for the Appellants tendered an affidavit-of-service dated 6th November,2006, the same is taken on record. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 21 days delay in filing the above Appeal. Perused the Notice of Motion and affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay in filing the above Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellants. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) V.MOHTA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)