IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRIMINAL MISC.-M NO.30275 OF 2011 DATE OF DECISION: DECEMBER 05, 2011 Jagdev Kumar .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Anil Kumar Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Counsel says that only 12 witnesses have been examined out of total 21 to be examined by the prosecution. Further says that he will not press this petition at this stage but would pray for some direction to expedite the trial. Since this Court is not very well acquainted with pendency before the Trial Court, it would not be appropriate to issue such direction for expediting the trial. However, the Trial Court is expected to decide the cases with urgency and there is no need to issue any direction to conclude the trial in some time bound period. Dismissed. December 05, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE