IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELALTE SIDE SECOND APPEAL NO.1413 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1998 OF 2005 Rukmini Pandurang Kini. ...Appellant. Vs. Devrao Pandurang Patil & Anr. ...Respondents. .... Mr.Rajiv L. Patil for the Appellant. ..... CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. December 2, 2005. P.C.: The First Appellate Court has noted that factually the suit property is no longer in existence and had collapsed. In the circumstances, (i) the licence in favour of the Appellant-Plaintiff stood terminated upon the property ceasing to be in existence; and (ii) the Appellant admitted in the evidence that she was not in possession of the property. In the circumstances, the First Appellate Court was not in error in interfering with the order of the Trial Court and in dismissing the suit. There is no substantial question of law. The Second Appeal is dismissed. In view of the dismissal of the Second Appeal, the Civil Application does not survive and is accordingly disposed of. ....