IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 3118 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.5.2009 Surinder Kumar alias Surinder Singh ....Petitioner Versus Brij Pal and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. S.K. Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL J **** The challenge in the present petition is to the orders passed by learned Courts below whereby the application filed by the petitioner for interim relief in a suit for permanent injunction was dismissed. The petitioner filed suit claiming that he is owner in possession of his house and for ingress and outgress thereof he was using the area which was lying open in front thereof. Except that there was no passage for him to approach the street. Prayer for interim injunction was dismissed by both the Courts below considering the definite stand of the respondent-Gram Panchayat that it was merely making pucca floor on this courtyard and no construction was being raised. Once that is so, there was no question of any apprehension of the petitioner that his ingress and outgress through open courtyard in front of his house is being disturbed. Admittedly the petitioner is not owner of the open courtyard. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed. (RAJESH BINDAL) 27.5.2009 JUDGE Reema