IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-30690 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision:03.12.2009. Dharam Pal Chabbra ...Petitioner Versus State of U.T., Chandigarh and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Karan Vir Nanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate, for U.T., Chandigarh. Mr. Jasbir Singh Mor, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. Crl. Misc. No.61550 of 2009 On consensual basis, the Crl. Misc. application shall stand allowed. The necessary correction is ordered to be made at the appropriate places by the Registry. Crl. Misc. No.M-30690 of 2009 The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioner and respondent No.2 have compounded the offences and have placed on record documented compromise, which may be read as Annexure P-2. A draft for Rs.1 lac has been handed over by the petitioner today in the Court to the respondent No.2. Petitioner and respondent No.2 are present in the Court and are identified by their respective counsel. They own up the compounding. They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statement is also recorded separately. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.252 dated 31.10.2002, under Sections 406, 409, 420 IPC, P.S. Sector 26, U.T. Chandigarh (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. December 03, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE