@w F WNW Q? / Q§1W IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR a» W. P.’(Cf1) No. QC)” OF 2011. PETITIoNER : Ganga Ram Sahu, / aged about 44 years, S/o. Shri Dileshvvar Sahu, Caste Kharra, R/o. Village Kudumkela, Tahsil Gharghoda, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDEMS /";1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secr¢tary, DepanM‘ent of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G.) 2. Superintendent of Police, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Police Station, Gharghoda, Through : Officer Incharge, P. S. Gharghoda, District Raigarh, (C.G.) / 4. Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.), Gharghoda, District Raigarh, (C.G.) ‘ V, /~5. Gopranjan Sahu, S/o. Shri Nirakar Sahu, aged about 48 years, Caste Kharra, R/o. Village Kudumkela, Tahsil Gharghoda, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 34:5 W” mm??? $w gg’g/Oy m mam, whim WW W®EH Wmmw $a1fiaqm Daepli SE : Hon’bke Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 03-02-2011 Shri PMShriwas, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the $tatel‘ respondent Noj to 4, on advance copy. The gnevance of the petitioner as set out in this petition is that though the petitioner has submitted a reoort in the police station aiieging that respondent. No.5 is causing air tiution, no action has been taken by respondent No.2, 3 and 4. Learned counsei for the petitioner however could not point out whether allegations ade in the report in the police station constitute any cognizabie offence u der any law for the time being in force. if according to the petitioner, he alleged act on the part of respondent No.5 warrants an action to be tak n, it would be open for the petitioner to approach the competent authority u der the relevant ciause, in these circumstances, no di ection can be issued to the respondents, considering the allegations which ha e been leveled in this petition. With the aforesaid observatio s, the petition is finatiy disposed off. , Sdl— Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge