IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 10967 of 2008. Decided on: 21 st December, 2010. Tilak Raj. …Petitioner. -Versus- The State of H. P. and Others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________________ __ For the petitioner. : Mr. Lokender Paul Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Case of the petitioner, in a nut-shell, is that though he was initially appointed as Beldar, however, he had been discharging the duties of Bill Distributor. The fact of the matter is that the petitioner has been regularized as Beldar without taking into consideration the services discharged by the petitioner as Bill Distributor. 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to seek option of the petitioner whether he would like to be regularized as Beldar or Bill Distributor. While taking a decision, the respondents shall also take into consideration the notification dated 09.12.2005. The needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 21, 2010. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. (bhupender)