IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 29TH BHADRA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 2981 of 2011() ------------------------- (CRIME NO.205/11 OF CHELAKKARA POLICE STATION, TRICHUR DISTRICT) ---------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED --------------------------------- BADUSHA, S/O. CHEKKUTTY, KUNDUPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHELAKKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ANIL RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------------------ 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHELAKKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 586. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHELAKKARA 680 586. 3. STATE, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 31. 4. ARUN KUMAR, S/O. BALAKRISHNAN, PANDARATHIL HOUSE, VADAKKUMURI DESOM, THONOORKORA VILLAGE, CHELAKKARA. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.JAISURYA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.MC.No. 2981 of 2011() -------------------------------------- APPENDIX --------------- PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ---------------------------------- ANNEXURE 1. COPY F THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE 1(A). COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF ANNEXURE I. ANNEXURE II. COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMAITION REPORT ANNEXURE II(A). COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF ANNEXURE II. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL ------------------------------------ / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. -------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.2981 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of September 2011 O R D E R Two crimes were registered against the petitioner as Crime Nos.200/11 and 205/11 of Chelakkara Police Station. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the investigation is now being conducted by the CBCID, Economic Offences. The contention that the allegations in both the complaints are alike and so both crimes should be clubbed together is not something to be done by this Court at this stage. The cause of action so far as one complaint may be different and evidence to be collected in that case also may be different from the other case. 2. The other contention raised by the petitioner is that he was in remand in connection with Crime No.200/11 for one day and so he should not be remanded in Crime No.205/11 also. Detention in one crime cannot be a ground Crl.M.C. No.2981 of 2011 -: 2 :- to avoid being arrested or detained in another crime. 3. The offences alleged are under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. With regard to the request for bail, the remedy of the petitioner is to move the appropriate court for that purpose. No further direction is to be made in this case. Petitioner can raise all available contentions before the learned Magistrate. This Crl.M.C. is disposed of with the above obervations. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt