IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3519 of 2010 CHITRANJAN SINGH, S/o Uma Shankar Singh. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 09.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 25 (1-B) A, 30 and 35 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted that seven persons were found to be occupants of a Bolero Jeep in which three rifles and one gun apart from some cartridges relating to the some fire arms were recovered. None of the occupants were licence holder even though all the arms were licensed and the licenses were recovered from Bolero Jeep itself. The petitioner is said to be one of the occupants of the Bolero Jeep and there is only one other case of the year 2005 pending against the petitioner also under the provisions of Arms Act. In view of the submission that the arms recovered were licensed and co-accused similarly placed have been released on bail by this Court, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since - 2 - 06.11.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur in connection with Barahara P.S. Case No. 269 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. - 3 - The Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail will verify the fact that the petitioner is accused in one other case i.e. Ara Mufasil P.S. Case No. 66 of 2005 for the offences under Sections 25 (1- B) A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)