IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41548 of 2010 MADHAV JHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 13.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Rs.11,77,780/- is withdrawn by In-charge, Head Master from the Joint Account of Kumari Sadhana with him, is the allegation of Kumari Sadhana. She never signed any cheque. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that matter relates with misappropriation of the money either by the In-charge, Head Master or by Kumari Sadhana and him. In case, signature is genuine both are responsible for the same, if not genuine then liability goes to In-charge, Head Master but in both the cases as submitted proper care was taken by the Bank Officials and signature is yet to be compared by Forensic Department. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Saur Bazar P.S. Case No. 164 of 2010 above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saharsa subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)