1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICMTURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 4344 of 2008 Satish v. The State of Maharashtra and ors ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr R.N. Badhe, Advocate for petitioner. Coram : D.D. Sinha and A.P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 20th January 2009 Heard Mr R.N. Badhe, learned counsel for the petitioner. Petitioner is challenging advertisement dated 4.9.2008 issued by respondent no. 3 for filling up posts of Compounder. Grievance of the petitioner is in respect of qualification mentioned in the advertisement which is D.Pharm. for the said post. It is contended that the said qualification is inconsistent with the recruitment rules and, therefore, the advertisement is bad in law. Learned counsel for the petitioner was unable to show us relevant recruitment rules in this regard. In absence thereof, it is difficult for us to appreciate contention canvassed by learned counsel for petitioner. Consequently, no 2 case is made out for showing indulgence. Petition dismissed. Judge. Judge. hsj