Y m im m mg mGH (lbw or; Jxcamm JABAPu 6 M;c P WRIT PETITIQN NO‘ ' q?€€' OF 199 mp. state Raaa Transpart %zperatiam ... pwmxa om. / u Varsus t- M.F. ranspeart warkars Feéaratiam aip!3r 5s @thars / {u o . RE SE3ONDE W3. mm pza‘rxTmN vmER ¢mwxm zza/za? w mg, giwsrwim OF 22mm wk LWxm A mm m Tm! M'wm‘ a? cmTmRARI; 3&mmus; Wm.“ . 2m) ALsa rm Issvm; Ngmgémv atm‘rmns partieulara ea£tm yatgtgsmn : ' Eu . Stata Raé§ Transpart C¢m¢aratiam Thr‘ ugh its Eivisiwl Maaager, i iaaiwur Divisiam RAIPUR. yartmu a; s” @f t_he’_ Rig-,pgngg gigs g 1— M‘P. Transpeurt Wgrker‘a Fad eratw‘an, Threw?! 1t< Div imml Prevsiée’g Raipui‘ {IvL-b): Awahesh Pratap Singh. making Agent, MpPiscR~T¢cu: Raipur DEFQt Nwav 1k Raipur (my) ‘. ; x The FreSiairzg O§ficere Labour Churn RAIPUR. / « Tim Member image: 4 . §t§t» Tnriustrial Cam; C L Bem§3 gt. Raip‘ér (M?) . "w Part1¢u1ar§ 9f the Onassrs gai nst which tm titmm 1a mania : / R a i S m 'Q% HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Pe1ition No. 4766 of 1996 Petitioner M. P. State Road Transport Corporation Versus Rospondent M. P. Transport Workers Federation Raipur 6r. others Single Bench : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Apihotri. None for the petitioner. None for the respondent. ORAL ORDER (14th dupe, 2006) The following order of the Court was passed by Satish K. Agihotri, J. 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. On both the occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. 2. In View of the above, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. i SdA ,,/ SATISH K. AGNIHO‘I‘RI Judge