wp641-11.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.641 OF 2011 Prashant B. Shahane .. Petitioner versus The Malad Sahakari Bank Ltd & Ors .. Respondents Mr.Devrat Dhanhar i/by Ms.Riddhi Shah for the petitioner. None for the respondents. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 20th JUNE 2011. P.C.: 1] The petitioner challenges execution notice dated 9th August 2010. Petitioner claims to be aggrieved by this notice. However, the notice itself indicates that the Recovery Officer is proceeding under Rule 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961. This rule provides for a complete remedy if anybody is aggrieved by the attachment levied during the course of execution of recovery certificate issued under section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. wp641-11.doc 2 2] Even if the petitioner has challenged the Recovery Certificate under section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, then all the more, the petitioner has to abide by section 154 of the same as that section provides for a revision to the Registrar. 3] Writ petition is not the remedy of the petitioner and it is totally misconceived. He has alternate and equally efficacious remedy of approaching the authorities and particularly under Rule 107 of the MCS Act. For all these reasons this petition is misconceived and is dismissed. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)