^\M^^.^"". ii:iil^®i! ^es^lES'S^N--"" ,'dateit. INTHEHIGHCOURTOFCHHATT'ISGARHAfBlLASPURfG.G.^ '':^:'l:';;.:i:' '^ UNDER ARTICLE 226 ORTHE CONSTTTUTION OF INb ®^ ^, ^PETmONER: , • •.Virendra Singh Tkhakur, ^ s/o?^Awacl^ .: ?:Thakur;,: aged:, abpyf t.6t ^years,;;i;oeffl.iR3t:i^ ;, service, Rrincipalv GQvt., ^HjgHe^Seeoilda^ ^School, Bhanbeda, Distric;.?HNQi'tli:y,^Ba§taR ;,K:Kanker:<G.G.^.'l!:^'.y;^'^;:;'^ Versus. •' ,;;: :/.••.'. :.':::..",.^Yl::;^!;^^^^^^^ ^istate of 'Chhattisgarh,Hhix)ug 'Sg(:reatg:ry^ ' Department.of'Schedyle .GasCe^arid^hediuleii Tribe Developmenf^DX.S.Bhawan^Rai[NRilyB .Deputy Secretary, •Departrrienti;iE!f|;Schecl!jlgp .Gaste ahd Schedule Tribe'Dewelopm§hfeil2i(<SSii; /.Bhawan,\Raipur :; ' •::,:,:::^'l'::^rt^:';;:^^^ Gommissioner'.Tribal^l.^ ^;Chhaffisgarh.!Government,^iRURg^ai|s^^ RESPQNDENTS: >^1. Y 2. /3. ^4.:/;r''AssistanC^Qmmi^iQnei',^21^BaB;BCTel^iieFiii wai Ncirth Basta|-,?Kankeri<e.G) in MK»1COJRTOF CHHATnsaWH AT BILASR^ W.P. No.49Wrf2005 Pefittoner VifendraSlr^hThalair Versus Respondents StateofChhalfe^uti&otheis SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. AgnUiotri, J ShriAlolcBatehi, Adyocate forthe pefifioner. Miss E3eepali Pand^, Panel Lawyer for the re^ondents/State. ORDeR (Passed on Ws 2^tl <tey of Felwuaiy, 2007) The followingorelerof Bie Court is fassed by SatfehK Agnlhotri, J. 1. The peafoner wtfiBe troridr^ as Prindpal In Govt Ngher Secondfuy School, Bhanbeda, District- North Bastar, Kanksr was transferred to Basantala, EM^rict - Jashpur on the same terms artd GCTidllteis WSe impugned transfsr ordsr dated 6.9.2005 (Annexure P/1). 2. This Court vide interim order dat«t7.10.208 dlra^ed ttiat the ^fed and operafion ofthe impt^ned orcter steB remaln stayed W the nead dateofhearing. 3. Be that as it may, wtth tiiepassage ofttne Ihis peWon has beceme infructuous as period of transfer is nc*appBcabteft ver. Atthis peint of time ttiere is no qyesflwi to examlne the \aHdlly of the tran^r order, However, the responttents are at Bberty to pass af^KH>rhte orders lceepfrig fh vjewthe piABc interest andadminl^ritfv®fa^jwcv. without inslsting on eomptiance of tto ImjiMgned transfer wdw. 4. (t is well settted principfe of law that transfer fs an fnddent ofservfee and it is for the employer to decide ss to where a parUwlar (rfficer/emptoyee be posted keeplng in srfew pubBc interertas WeU < admintstrative eidgency. This Court has limited juristfic8<m to interfere in e transfer matter anetthte Court can interfereonty in tt»case of proved malafide, non-competence of ayttwrity (asslng ttie taUBfer , order and fransfer order not belng in confiarmity wiBi the rutes and regulations. 5. In view of tfis above. this petifion stands disposed of. No mder as to coste. Sd/- / • > i satIsh^Agniiibtri ^ 1:1 N""N4*!! Byma1