BE8C» a^ i-^— IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. -^ ?6 OF 2010 PETITIONER \° .^l ^ <0SX" .^y RESPONDENTS /' PYARELAL KURRE Aged about 59 years, s/o late shri Khelan Ram Kurre, Working as Assistant Grade- 3, Nagar Panchyat Pandaria, R/o Pandaria, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Urban Administration and Development Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). / 2. Under Secretary, Urban Administration and Development Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). / 3. Collector and President District Town Development Agency Kabirdham (C.G.) , 4. President NagarPanchyat Pandaria District-Kabirdham (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH ATBILASPU WRIT PETmON (S) No. 5676 of2010 PETITIONER : Pyarelal Kurre. RESPONDENTS VERSUS. State ofChliattisgaA & Others. ~\- -v' WRIT PETITION UNDER AR11CLE 226 OF THE CONSTITm'ION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Slui Satish K. AsmhoM, J, Present: Sliri .^jshok Swamakar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Govenmient Advocate for the State. PRDER(ORAL) (Passed on 12tt day ofMay, 2011) I. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents subniits that the petitioner has already continued at the originaiplace ofpostmg for more tha?i eight months on account ofmterim order granted by this Court 01.10.2010. The State/respoiidents may be gi'anted liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in view public interest and admmistrative exigency. Shri Dvvivedi farther submits that the State/respondeiits shall not insist upon compliance ofthe impugned order dated 21,09.2010 (Aimexure P/5) m respect ofthe petitioner/ 2. At this stage, when 210 effect could be given to the impugiied order dated 21.09.2010 (Aimexiire P/5) on account ofthe interim order dated 01.10.2010, thus, it is not necessary to go into legality and validity ofthe aforestated impugned orders. 3, Iii view ofthe above, accordmg to leamed counsel appearmg for the petitioner, iiothiiig sundves in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of No order asto costs. 5. Interim relief gi'anted 01101.10.2010 is vacated. Sd/- . . SatisbK.Agnihotn Judge