IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1766 of 2008 Date of Decision: March 05, 2009 Jai Singh … Petitioner Versus Kishori and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present : Mr. S.R. Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Bairagi, Advocate, for respondent No.1 Mr. Vikram Punia, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 3, 6, 7 and 8. S.D. Anand, J. Though it is apparent from the record that the petitioner – plaintiffs did avail of a number of opportunities (before their evidence came to be closed under the orders of this Court), it cannot be ignored from consideration that the documents indicated in the impugned order as `a to k’ and Aks Sajra are part of the revenue record and further that the judgment and decree in Civil Suit No. 148 dated 30.11.1960 would also not require any formal C.R. No. 1766 of 2008 proof. The same is, however, not true of `list of owners’ and `Local Commissioner Report’ which require formal proof thereof. The reception of that evidence would enable the Court to factually dispose of the controversy. In the light of the facts noticed above, the petition shall stand allowed. The impugned order shall stand set aside. The petitioner shall be entitled to tender into evidence the copies of jamabandies entered at point `a to k’ in the impugned order, along with Aks Sajra and copies of the judgment and decree in Civil Suit No. 138 dated 30.11.1960. The petitioner shall not be entitled to ender into evidence `list of witnesses’ and `Local Commissioner report’. The allowance of the petition shall be subject to the payment of Rs.10,000/- as costs. March 05, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2