"'& l-f^ @ IN THEHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURB AT BILASPUR (C.G.) Sqa_y- M.C.C.NO. 5o .QF2e?iftT fljvlsion (Arising out of orieinal First Appeal (M| No. 8 /2008) AN APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF F.A. (M| N0. 8/2008 - "SMT. SANTOSHI JAISWAL VS. RAKESH JAISWAL", DISMISSED IN DEFAULTOND6/10/2010 BY HON'BLE SHRI QUDDUSI, J. AND SHRI AGRAWAL^J, APPLICANT ^s^^.<\-; (S'-t"' .<y"; ^6 0^-- o^ N^NLAPPLICANT (RESPONDBNT) Smt. SantoshiJaiswal,'>^tfijSstf<BS^13'mswa< .^ 3) •W/o Padman Dansena, Aged about 24 years, Caste Kalar, R/o Village ^. Boir Dadar, Raigarh, Tahsil and ..^.••••"' District Raigarh (CG.). \ VERSUS 'Rakesh Jaiswal, S/o Ganesh, Jaiswal, aged about 25 years, Unemployed, Caste Kalar, R/o Village Kosir, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG). The applicant submit as under : - t^)- 2. HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BJLASPUR M. C. C. No. 50 of 2011 Applicant Smt. Santoshi Jaiswal Versus Respondent RakeshJaiswal DB: Hon'ble Shri I. M. Quddusi & Hon'ble Shri N. K. Agartval, JJ APPL!CATIQNFOR_SESTORAT!QNOFF.A. (M) . 8/2008 Shri Manoj Jaiswal, Advocate for the applicant. O R D ER (orall (Passed on this 24th day of Februaiy, 2011) Per I. M. Quddusi, J. The applicant has filed this applif-ation for restoration of the F.A.(M) No. 8/2008 (Smt. Santoshi Jaiswal Vs. Rakesh Jaiswal), which was dismissed for want of prosecution by orderdated6.IO.2010. As per the office report the application is barred by 27 days. The applicant has filed I.A.No.l for condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant for condonation of delay as well as for restoration of the case. Therefore the application for condonation of delay (I.A.No.l) and application for restoration (M.C.C. No. 50 of 2011) are allowed. F.A.(M) No. 8/2008 may be restored to the original file and the same may be listed for hearing. Thakur Sd/- I.M.Quddusi Jrfdge Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge