IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46308 of 2009 PINKU YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 8.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Prayer for regular bail is sought on the ground of informant’s not identifying the petitioner, appears tampering of witness. The trial is expected to be concluded in the month of February, 2010. So on the ground of absence of evidence, I am not going to give any relief to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected. However, if trial is not concluded till March, 2010, petitioner will have option to renew the same but at the conclusion of trial (S.T. no.255 of 2009), the trial court, that is, Additional Sessions Judge II, Katihar shall ascertain if the informant has given false statement (evidence), a prosecution case be lodged for the same. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)