IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA CONTEMPT CASE No.1390 of 2011 In W.P.No.8177 of 2006 Between: K.Sudhakar ..... PETITIONER AND K.Narayana Reddy and another .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA CONTEMPT CASE No.1390 of 2011 In W.P.No.8177 of 2006 ORDER: The petitioner has filed the present contempt case, wherein it has been averred that the respondents herein have flouted the orders dated 02.09.2010 passed by this Court in W.P.8177/2006, vide which, directions were given to the respondents for reinstatement of the petitioner with continuity of service but without any backwages and other attendant benefits. Heard the learned counsel for both parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 2nd respondent issued orders dated 03.02.2011 directing reinstatement of the petitioner. He further submits that although the petitioner was taken back into service and posted at Uadayagiri Depot on 04.03.2011, but his pay has not been re-fixed and he has not been paid any arrears till date. The operative portion of the order dated 02.09.2010 passed in W.P.No.8177/2006 is as follows: “The order of removal of the petitioner from service is set aside. Petitioner is entitled for reinstatement with continuity of service but without any backwages and other attendant benefits.” A perusal of the aforementioned order shows that the petitioner was held entitled to be reinstated with continuity of service but without any backwages and other attendant benefits. As far as taking back of the petitioner in service is concerned, he has already been taken back in service. As far as other benefits are concerned, the petitioner is not held entitled for any other benefits except continuity of service. Despite that, the learned counsel for the respondents stated that as far as fixation of pay of the petitioner is concerned, the same is under process and the fixation form has been audited and is ready for implementation in the salary bill for the month of November 2011. The other aspect with regard to payment of arrears to the petitioner from the date of his reinstatement into service is concerned, the learned counsel for the respondents stated that the calculation of arrears would take place after the audit is over and the same would be implemented in the salary bill of December 2011. In view of the above, I am of the considered opinion that not only the respondents fully complied with the orders passed by this Court on 02.09.2010, but also the petitioner was given much more what he was given vide orders dated 03.02.2011. In view of the above, no case for contempt has been made out against the respondents. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed. ______________________ ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA,J Dated: 15.12.2011 Dsr