'3v^ ^WW-{, W^\W' , Rfiiy^< ^mvii *NI* WI. 200 sn^ xraw (4«i(-j»i({Er) aii^r ^r'RaN; ?1I s^y sh*iro TOlIWdtelsffI^l SINGLE BENCH; HClNiBLb JUSUUIs DHIRENDrotmiSHRA PETITtONERS (DeTendants Vs RESPONDENTS (Plaintiffs) w 1. R^imanand Chandrakar, Aged about 76 ^ars, By Caste-Kurmi W/o Late Ubhairam Cbandrakar. 2. Bilhari Lal Oiandrakar, Age-53 yeare, S/o i()ri Ramnand Chandrakar, By Caste-Kurmi. 3. R^ikesh Kumar Chandrakar, Age-45 yeare, jo Shri Ramanand Chandrakar, By Caste- Kdrmi. 4. Chandrashekhar Chandrakar, Age-35 yeare, Shri Ramnand Chandrakar, By Caste- Kdrmi. Allth are Mani 1.1 2. 3. 4. 5. l=hl<lfci<fll ^l+lcTl '£f^<cQ <F>1^R ^? aifgir 3D^r IC1 No.1873 of 2007 above are by Profession Cultivator, and Vo Kurni-Para, Purani Basti, Near Ram ir, Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund (CG) Siv Kumar Chandrakar, S/o Late Ubhairam Chandrakar, Age-59 yeara, By Caste-Kunni, By Profession-Rett. Semi- Govt. Employee, R/o Janta Colony, Q. No.849, Tilak Nagar, Raipur Distt. Raipur (CG) Smt. Dulari Bai Chandrakar, W/o Late Batdou Chandrakar Age- 05 Years, By Caste-Kurmi. Sanjay Kumar Chandrakar, S/o Late Baldou Chandrakar Age- 46 Years, By Caste-Kunni. Tarun Kumar Chandrakar, S/o t-ate Baldou Chandrakar Ags- 43 Yeare, By Caste-Kurmi. Prakash Kumar Chandralrar, S/o Late Baldou Chandrakar P>ge- 46 Yeara, By Caste-Kurmi. All the above 2 to 05 are by Profession- Cultivator, and are R/o Village-Hikksha, Post-Khatti, Tahsil & P.S. Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) T^s^Wv^l, ^Tfl'M'is, Riwi^fy MWdl *NI=b W, 200 311^1 ?iT R-f(i* OTI sr^v **<i+ sn^?r xraq? ('^fgg5w) ^iiw ^ifer 3ii^i —Z--1- 6. cbl^Id41*1 •tTffiflf Tf,'f^1^ <F>t^$i< ^siRwan^r 7. 07.04.2008 Mr. J.A. Lohani, Advocate Mr. B.D. Guru, Advocates Mr. Shashank Thakur, P.1 Heard. The petitioner aggrieved pshan Lal Chandrakar, Age- 64 Years 3/o Late Ubhairam Chandrakar, By Caste-Kurmi, By Profession-Cultivator, P/o Kurni-Para, Purani Basti, Near Ram tandir, Mahasamund, Distt. lahasamund (CG) 'he State of Chhattisgarh, Through the ;ollector, Mahasamund, District ihasamdun (C.G.) for the petitioners. forthe respondent No.1 to 6. [.. for respondent No.7. by the order of Annexure P-1 dated 27.1.2007 has filed this writ petition on thje ground that the court below by the impugned order did not frame the issues fl js disposed of with a direction tc^ proposed above and thereafterfjroceed with the matter. Certified copy as per rul^. 'oposed by the defendants vide his application of Annexure P-4. Learned advocates app^aring on behalf of the parti^ fairiy submit that this petition may be disposed of ^fter framing the additional issues as under- • Whether the suit| property is self-acquired property of defendant hto.1 to 5? • Whether Rewra ^ai, daughter of deceased Baldau is a necessary party? In view of (he agreed projiosal of the parties to the suit, the instant petition the court belwv to frame the additional issues as Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge ^