IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2098 of 1996 MOHAMMAD HABIBI AHMAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 8. 1.9.2008. No body appears on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 14.12.1995 and 4.2.1996 because he has been placed in the cadre of steno-typist. The petitioner is seeking his inclusion in the cadre of clerk after bifurcation of cadre on 1.4.1981. He is claiming that he was appointed on the post of clerk, although he was appointed as Steno- cum-typist. A counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent no.6 has been filed in which it has been stated that the petitioner has not been included in the gradation list of clerk as he was never appointed on the post of clerk. Merely, on the ground that he was allowed to work as a clerk, he is not entitled and could not be entitled to be treated as a clerk. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has been paid his salary as a steno –cum-typist, and as such, his claim is without basis. Considering the facts aforesaid, this writ application is dismissed. U.K. (Sheema Ali Khan,J)