IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37819 of 2008 MAHENDRA CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 8.12.2008 It is unfortunate that prayer for bail in such cases have been dismissed merely for the reasons that charges have been framed in three cases. The Court has gone hoarse in pointing out to the Judges nanning the subordinate courts, that section of offences, special nature of enactment, or such matter as of taking cognizance and framing of charges could not have any relevance in the matter of granting bail to the accused of offence. I could advice the Judges specially of F.T.C-III, Jehanabad, to desist from such judicial practice and not to be afraid of passing orders appropriately required to be passed in the facts and circumstances of the case. Let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing personal recognition bond of Rs.500/-(Five hundred) without any surety to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C.,IIIrd, Jehanabad, in connection with S.Tr. no.708/2006/223/2006 arising out of Jehanabad P.S. case no.92 of 2004. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )