IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 26TH JUNE 2007 / 5TH ASHADHA 1929 WP(C).No. 10220 of 2007(N) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- KRISHNA PILLAI, S/O. LATE PADMANABHA PILLAI, PADMA BUILDING, VATTAPARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.MANOJ R. NAIR. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, NEDUMANGAD. 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY), NEDUMANGAD. 3. D.RAJESHWARI, W/O. RAVEENDRAN NAIR, VIPOORNAM, EURRA NO.BO., ELANJIMOODU, EDAPPAZHANJI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. THAJUDEEN, SC, KSEB, ADV. SRI.M.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/06/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.10220/2007: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 34 OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY ACT. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY ACT DTD. 01/12/2005. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE REQUEST ADDRESSED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE R.1, WITH COPY TO THE R.2. DTD. 07/02/2007. //TRUE COPY// prv. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... W.P.(C) No.10220 of 2007 .................................................................... Dated this the 26th day of June, 2007. JUDGMENT Since the purchaser of the property namely, third respondent, has agreed to clear the balance arrears, W.P. is closed granting facility to the third respondent to settle the dispute by paying balance arrears with 50% of the interest and without requirement of paying any collection charges, if payment is made before 31.7.2007. However, if payment is not made, waiver of 50% interest and collection charges granted will stand cancelled and second respondent will proceed for recovery of entire amount from third respondent. The amount to be paid by third respondent is after setting off payment already made by the petitioner. The third respondent will pay the amount paid by the petitioner to him. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms