IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42534 of 2010 DEVENDRA KUMAR, SON OF RAJENDRA YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHAKDAHWA, P.S.- ANDER, DISTRICT-SIWAN. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.01.2011 Heard Sri A.B. Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ashok Kumar, learned Additional Public prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, who is in custody in Siwan Muffassil P.S. Case no. 230 of 2010 for the offence under Sections 420 & 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code., has prayed for grant of bail. The informant, in the present case has alleged that on the pretext to install a Tower of Aircel he was persuaded by one Baban Kumar Yadav to come to Patna at Aircel office and if he provides 25 feet of land for installing the Tower and also money for security, he will be getting a handsome monthly rent. Thereafter, the informant came to Patna and allegation against the petitioner is that he introduced himself as an officer of the company and Rs. 75,000/- was paid to accused Vishal Kumar and Rs. 30,000/- was given to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in jail since 26.8.2010 and co –accused namely Vishal Kumar, having serious allegation than the petitioner, has already been extended the privilege of bail 2 by this court on 5.1.2011 vide Cr. Misc. no.2891 of 2010. In view of the fact that co-accused having similar allegation has been extended the privilege of bail, there is no reason to deny the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Siwan in connection with Siwan Muffassil P.S. Case No. 230 of 2010. Amit ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)