1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13577 OF 2010 WITH REVIEW PETITION ST. NO.25380 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2803 OF 2007 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri. Pradeep Deshmukh, Advocate h/f Shri. S.G. Bhalerao, Advocate for applicant. Shri. V.D. Rakh, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 22ND OCTOBER, 2010 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Shri. Pradeep Deshmukh, the learned Counsel submits that on the subject property, three hundred years old temple is situated. After receiving notices 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders from the authorities, the appeal under Section 24 of the Bombay Highway Act, 1955 was filed. Pending the appeal, the authorities will have to stay further proceedings. In spite of the said provision, the authorities have proceeded to demolish the temple. 3. We have considered the grounds raised to review an order dated 13-04-2010 passed by Division Bench of this Court (Coram : Naresh H. Patil & N.D. Deshpande, JJ.). 4. We do not find any satisfactory or justifiable ground to entertain this review petition. In respect of temple structure, the applicants have already approached the Collector. The application for condonation of delay and Review Application are dismissed. 3 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders 5. It is clarified that the dismissal of the Review Application shall not affect the merits of the appeal, in case filed before the Collector. sd/- sd/- [K.K. TATED,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] sut/OCT10/ca-13577.10