1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6554 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 335 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | CORAM : P. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 15 th JULY, 2010. 1 Heard Adv. Shri C.R. Deshpande for the applicants. None present for the respondents. 2 Advocate for the applicants states that same trust was sought to be registered by two persons. Present appellant Devdan Manga Patil wants the trust to be registered as “Christie Mandal Nandurbar” whereas original defendant Fatesingh R. Valvi sought to register the trust as “Nandurbar Christie Mandali, Nandurbar”. After considering the applications, application for 2 registration by present appellant was dismissed whereas the application by Fatesingh was allowed. As against said order, appeal was filed to the Jt. Charity Commissioner and then application to the District Court under section 72 of the Bombay Public Trust Act was filed. In the meantime, Fatesingh had died and Mr. Jems Raisa Panjabi continued on his behalf to represent “Nandurbar Christie Mandali, Nandurbar”. Now it is revealed that even Mr. James Panjabi has expired and therefore this application for bringing “Nandurbar Christie Mandali, Nandurbar” through its President. In the facts and circumstances of the case, application is allowed as per prayer clause ‘B’. ( P. R. BORKAR, J.) dyb / office / ca6554.10.odt