IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17584 of 2011 RAM BALAK MALAKAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 27.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with G.P. Case No. 02 of 2007 in which cognizance has been taken under Section 376/511 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that the petitioner tried to remove the clothes of the informant and made attempt to establish forceful physical relationship with the informant. It appears that complaint was filed on 23.06.2007 when the cognizance was taken on 08.03.2011. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that one Bhulo Devi filed the complaint against the present complainant in which the petitioner was made Panch and the complaint case no. 1504 of 2007 was also filed by this petitioner against the present complainant. It appears that though the 2 two complaints dated 28.06.2007 and 27.06.2007 filed by Bhulo Devi and the petitioner were subsequent to complaint filed by the present complainant as the present complaint was field on 23.07.2007. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no offence under Section 376/511 of the I.P.C. is made out. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day keeping in view the delayed taking of cognizance and litigated relationship with the parties if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned S. D. J. M., Purnea, in connection with G.P. Case No. 02 of 2007 at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)