Crl. Misc. No. M-1299 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-1299 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 03.06.2011 Tannu and another ......Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Sh. Guninder S. Brar, A.A.G., Punjab for respondent No. 1-State Mr. G.S. Rawat, Advocate for respondent No. 2 **** RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.57 dated 21.08.2010 under Sections 324, of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'the Code') and under Sections 326 IPC (added later on), registered at Police Station Jalandhar Cantt (Annexure P-1) and all the subsequent proceeding arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise/affidavit. Brief facts of the case are that the above FIR was registered Crl. Misc. No. M-1299 of 2011 (O&M) -2- at the instance of respondent No. 2. As per FIR, on 20.08.2010, complainant along with his family members were standing on the road then Tanu and Ganjoo encircled the complainant and Ganjoo caught hold of the complainant from his shirt near his neck from his front side and Tanu who was holding a dagger in his hand, gave a blow on chest, which hit him on his left side of the chest and then Tanu again gave second blow which hit him on his right side waist. The complainant raised rolla 'mar ditta' mar ditta' and on hearing the same, the relatives came out and on seeing, the assailants ran away from the spot along with their weapons. In the above background, FIR was registered against the petitioners. During the pendency of the investigation, the parties have compromised the matter by sitting together. The complainant has further stated that he do no want to further proceed with the case and has no objection if the above said FIR is quashed against the petitioners. The compromise has been effected without any pressure. In compliance of the order dated 17.01.2011, the parties were directed to appear before the trial Court for recording of their statements. Report of Chief Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jalandhar has been received in this regard. As per report, the statements of the parties have been recorded. As per the statement of the complainant, Crl. Misc. No. M-1299 of 2011 (O&M) -3- the complainant has stated that no compromise has been effected and the accused party are threatening him to effect the compromise in the present case. In view of the above factual position, the present petition is dismissed. (RITU BAHRI) JUDGE June 03, 2011 G.Arora