IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17782 of 2011 1. Dr. Surendra Narayan S/O Late Natho Singh. 2. Dr. Birju Prasad Singh S/O Shri Satyendra Prasad Singh. 3. Surendra Nath Singh S/O Late Bhagwan Singh 4. Shri Narayan Mishra S/O Late Ram Kumar Mishra 5. Rama Shankar Pandey S/O Late Baliram Pandey. 6. Rameshwar Choubey S/O Late Ram Bihari Choubey All residents of Road No. 1 'B' Shivpuri (Behind A.N. College, Patna) Police Station-Shastri Nagar, Town and District-Patna. ….. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary to the Government, Department Of Urban Development and Town Planning, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Patna Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Patna. 4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. 5. The Superintendent of Police (City), Patna. 6. The Officer-In-Charge, Shastrinagar Police Station, Patna. 7. Shri Bachha Mishra S/O Late Saryug Mishra Resident of Road No. 1 'B' Shivpuri (Behind A.N. College, Patna) Police Station-Shastri Nagar, Town and District-Patna. 8. Shri Ratish Prasad Singh S/O Late Raghunandan Prasad Singh, At present residing at Road No. 1 'B' Shivpuri, Police Station-Shastri Nagar, Town and District-Patna. …. Respondents ----------- 02 17.10.2011 The relief sought for in this writ petition which is in the form of a Public Interest Litigation is with regard to removal of the bottleneck of Road No.1B, Shivpuri behind A.N. College, in the town of Patna in order to bring uniformity of width in the entire road no.1B Shivpuri and/or to widen the road as per norms of town planning or at least to the extent that it may allow free flow of traffic and to have easy access of vehicles in emergency like Fire Tenders, Ambulance, Police Vehicles etc. and to construct sewerage, drains and other civil amenities to which every citizen is entitled. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has further stated that the Patna Regional Development 2 Authority(PRDA), now dissolved, has failed in its duty to widen the road even after putting mark on the boundary walls of the residents, but failed to execute the same for the reasons best known to the Corporation authorities. It has further been stated before us that a number of representations right from 18.11.1996, 13.2.1997, 20.2.2008, 19.10.2008. 2.2.2010, and 12.1.2011, vide Annexure 3, 4, 6, 7, 9 and 10 respectively have been filed and the same are remained unanswered till today by the respondent authorities. Having heard the other side, we are of the opinion that it would suffice if a direction is issued to the Respondent no.2 to consider the representations of the petitioners, if not already considered, in accordance with law as early as possible. With the above observation the writ petition stand disposed of. Chandran (T.Meena Kumari, J.) (Vikash Jain, J.)