1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 157 OF 2011 (Santosh @ Bunty Rampal Sahu vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri R. Ahmad, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri D.B. Yengal, APP for the respondents. ….. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. APRIL 20, 2011. Heard Shri Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Yengal, APP for the respondents. We have perused the petition and prayer of the petitioner. On going through the petition, we find that it is too vague. No relevant Act or Rules have been mentioned in the petition. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the owner of the Sonu Cycle Stores is a necessary party. Looking to the above facts, we are not inclined to entertain the petition. Liberty is given to the petitioner to prefer a fresh petition adding appropriate party and stating therein relevant Act and Rules. Petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.