(D IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AE BILASPUR (C.G.) mp. No.@é§1 /2oo3 PETITIONER G.S. Dhurve aged about 44 years S/o late Hulkar Slngh Dhurve VBlock Development Officer/ Area Organlser ;/ /Tribal block, Dondi, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ' l. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Department of Tribal Welfare Schedule Castes and Minority Welfare D.K.S. Bhavan, Mantralaya Raipur (C.G.) Collector (Tribal Development) Durg (Chhattisgarh) Chief Executiv Officer District Panchayat Durg (Chhattisgarh) Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development Department Durg (Chattisgarh) Project Officer Integrated Tribal Development Project Dondi Lohara District Durg (Chhattisgarh) Chief Executive Oficer Janpad Panchayat ndi District Durg (hattisgarh) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS AND FURTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS l. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: - / e h f DO Ch XI—HC-22 19I03i2004 Shri Jitendra Pali, cc Shri S. Gupta, State/ respondents. The petitioner has 1; unsel for the petitioner. Deputy Govt. Advocate for the referred this writ petition under Article 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned order dated 04107/2001 no. 2 / Collector. The case of the petit Development O$cen Tn'b: Durg and Vide impugned o: he has been transferred 01 Katekalyan, District Dante The main grievance which he' has been transi regani, r petitioner has respondents no. 1 and 2, ‘1 been decided. Therefore, I allowed to make a further1 he be directed to decide thc State] respondents has no n Having heard learne legard to the facts and circ allowed to make a det grievances to respondent :Annexure P/S) passed by respondent ioner is that he was working as Block 11 Development Block, Dondi, District ‘der dated 04/ 07/ 200 1 (Annexure P/ 5) 1 the post of Incharge Block Odicer to wada. of the petitioner is that the post on In this erred, is not his cadre post. made several representations to )ut so far his representations have not Le submits that the petin'oner may be epresentation to respondent no. 1 and : same to which learned counsel for the )bjection. d counsel for the parties and having umstances of the cas‘e, the petitioner is ailed representation raising all his no.1 within ten days and in turn mspondents no. 1 shall dt of thirty days hm thev considcn'ng all thc gn'cva objcctive manner by passi] law. With the aforesaid d of. Consequently, I.A.No. 1 1945/2003 also St Cem‘iied copy as per 1nd disposed of. :cide the representation within a period iate of mceipt of the mpresentation nces raised-by thc petitioner in an 1g a masoned order in accordance with irections the peh‘tion stands disposed M.W.P.NO, 755/2003 and Sdl- L.c.BHAD°° Judge Rules. {wéfas