^^)\^1^ IN 8EB MABBZA %&D^H A3M BC^'EBAZEVS TgCBTO^L AT JABfeLPUB "•_..l.-"' -- • ~ ••"-" ' >©.A.M). i ^^ @F 199^- -- -•- -"• -:- -'- BBTUESN —•—-——-~~ "^' ^CyL.Shid^st&^ @/o Ma^adeo Lal gbri^sti61^'®.»aged ^ y^rs afc preseat P@sfeed &s ib aaiasiia?r, Bai^rh'SBtegi.i, p,©, and Bistriet i^igarh regLdeafc of gbiyaa sfced Qaii Kotz® Road, BBi^rh, A%LIG&HT A N © 1» sta fce of Ma dbya B-adesh, throagla De|i&rtmeQt ©fReye©Bi©,^aiiabfe-^aawaB< Bhopai (M^, 2. Gonaaisstoner L&nd Beeords, Gw&Mor (MI5» 3< eemmissioaer (Beveaae) Miaspar Divlsion, Miaspar HB^PQMDBNTS ^EIAILS ©FAI>PLIGA%ilI, s '^* HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (S) No. 1044 of2005 APPLICANT RESPONDENTS C.L.Shi'ivastava. VERSUS State ofMadhva Pradesh & Others. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ACT, 1985 SB: Hon'ble Shil Satish K. Agniliotri, J. Present: None for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel La^yer forthe State/respondents. ORDER (QRAL) (Passed on 27th day ofOctober, 2009) ^w The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalfofthe petitioner. Tlie petitioner may not be interested iii pursuing the matter. In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. Registry is directed to send a copy ofthis order to tlie petitioner, fbrthwith. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aimt