IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2647 of 2009 Gani Rai . Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors . ----------- 2. 08.07.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the two orders both dated 20.6.2007 bearing no. 548 / 549 affecting the time bound promotions granted to him earlier and directing recovery. Originally the two orders were passed without any notice to show cause having adverse civil financial consequences for the petitioner. The counter affidavit at Para 9 states that on 15.6.2009 show cause notice has been issued to the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner acknowledges the same, and submits that the reply has been filed, notwithstanding which no final orders have been passed. Once the respondents acknowledge that the impugned orders dated 20.67.2007 were without opportunity to show cause, naturally the operation of the two impugned orders has to remain stayed till such time that the cause shown by the petitioner is not considered and disposed by a reasoned and speaking order. The Court orders accordingly. Keeping in mind that the petitioner has superannuated on 30.4.2009 let the matter be decided in the aforesaid manner within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The counter affidavit in Para 7 acknowledges that the petitioner has a right to be considered for grant of first and second ACP also. The Court directs the respondents to decide that issue within the same time period. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)