A' ^•^ C(- |(^+l ^(a+18^^ e^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIIASHJR (CHHmSGARH) WRIT fETITTON S0.'2-l'tf6 OF 2002 PETITIONER Bbagwat Prasad Sahu,son of Shrl Ram Kishun Sahu, aged about 45 years, resident of Village an<3 Post- Bheri Kslan, Tehsil and District- VE R SU S RESFONDENTS ^.o' .»»« .A.^::%^ ^^^vf'"'- %;vty' Jl-'' o.3 '&'- 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, througb Its Secretary,Departnent of Health and Pamlly Welfare,Mantralay. D.K.S.Bulldlng, Raipur, (CG) 2. The State of Madhya Pradesh, throagh Its Secretary,Department of Health and Family Wel.fare,Mantralay, Vallabh Bbawan,Bhopal, (M.P.) 3. The M.P.Board of Ayurvedic and Unani System of Medicine and Naturopathy, Bhopal(MP),tbrough tbe Reglstrar, Shyamla Hillas.Bhopal(MP). 4. 'Ehhattisgarh Board of Ayaryedlc an<3 Unani systen of Medlci.ne and Naturo- pathy. Raipur^througb Its Reglstrar, Raipur (CG) . 3 WRrr PETITION UHDER__ARTICLE_ 266/227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF IDDIA. ^\ - R XI-HC-22 7^ 'fs'tm^, ©TilwiG,ftwwy *11*ICTI %tffcti .f....y.Q.-....2-..l.!i6/2-^°2- "M 3It^(% K-ii* Sfl^g ?h'*fic^^fiQ tas !ig:3!sis*iB pj] ^RT^T ^«tt^•^E?(T .8/02/2003 Shri Prasbant Mishra, couns Shri Railbir Sin.gh, GA for fh( Heard. |1 for fhe petitioner- Since a conrmon question is |avolved on tiie prayer of fhe leamed couns( aad is being disposed of at fhe adnjission stag' In view of the limited natunf |avolved hi this writ petition, •l for ttie paities, it is heard tuae of hearing, which is for a dtre^ to consider the question of regi^ accordaacc ivith ffac rulcs, ^ovem.tD.g thc ficld, no uscful pui~p^ this \vrit petition penduig, whicl( counsel for the parties, is being d[ stage. According to ftie petitione^ Visharad an.d Avuryed Ratna quayication Snrnmplnn^ Prayag - ABahabad a^id on fhe basis thereof, he had approached respondeiit No.4 for issuaiice of a foiia so as crtwfo^ln Hm^i^ Te^ ifa-^i-t, ^sff^ptati^r {; of the prayer xnade at the Stion to the respondent No.4 i^tration of fhe petitioner in r^gulations and guidelincs |>sc wffl. bc servcd ia. kccpins on the prayer of leanied sposed of at tlie adiniasion , he has acqiiired Vaidya from. Hindi Sabih'a [-HC-22 SD^T^ 1<-< S^S sh+li=h ^T?d [y,.,yi^C^ 8 t.^;--—" Ts? ^iraRTT, a'al'y'is, ialcll'yy ^ Hm?ir «i*<i<* sn^t TCIRR ^iftir — 2-- to enable him to apply for regista No.4 did not issue aav form. wil been able to get himself registei flierewith, the petitioner is before In supportofhis claim. for on a decision of ttie M.P. High (Sekhar Jain -Vs- State of M.P.) ui W.P.No.558/2001 (ZehiruUa K|b.au & another - Vs - State of Chhattisgarh & otliers), copies w{ ^•>Tii^*<1'1 'W^. ^^^ff^^\{ i? arfitiii aii^r ition, but fhe said respondent li the i^sult that he lias not as Phann&cist. Aggrieved this Court. . retiance is ulacect Court m M.P. No.287/1990 and Chliattisgarh High Court hereof are annexed as P/ 1 & P/8 to tbe writ petition. In rebuljtal, the State has reUed on fae judgnicnt of tfac Suprcinc Co^rt in fhc casc of Statc of Raiasthaii - Vs - Lata Arun Hoivever, in. view of fhe linuted n^.ture of ftie prayer niade, it is not necessary to go iato fh.e meril Accordingly, in view of th| beaiing, fhe \vrit petition is 41SPOSe(:l °^ ^>y du'ectuig the the respondent No.4 to issue/appro^riate form to petitioaer, so as to enable hiTn to apply for registi^.tion. It is inade clear that fhe issuance of a forrn under the dit'ection of a Court is not to be 2002 A.I.R. S.C.W. 2966. ofthe case, prayer ruade at fhe tune of XI-HC-22 sn^i^ii Pt-li'* SfS^l ?t)*i •Mfifl teS^SSSSf' ...:-Ki8!N"- ^-?';~ 'S^ -<ii<<iin<f, afll'M'is, 'fadlti^'t w^ 2lR NWCff aiMltt) 2— (<<*<'?' construed as a direction requim^i registration to the petitioner. will have to be decided on iiieilits accordaiice with the rules, ioveming the field aiid iti cas conclusion fhat under the guidelmes fhe petitioner is no order shaU not preclude theiu fi to that effect. In view of the above, M.\ rclcfand I.A.No. 6931/2002 for of. Cerdfied copy as per inle^ cb't^I^fi'T <Lll*1f1i "^ FS<<;I <Pl+$K i; sipgi? sii^i the said resportdeiit to graiit he question of his registration by flie respondent No.4 in regulations aad guidelines the autliorities come to the |said rules, regulations and entitled for registration, tliis •om passing appropriate orders l/.P.No. 1210/2002 for mterim urgcnt hcaring staiid disposcd Sdf- P.C NAIK Judge