$0” W” W" .3‘<\"\"' x9 _ ga- 6¢w‘\‘x...w‘\& W. P. (S) No....§. .§..2006 ,067/ mgh g&m@ In the Hon’ble High Court of Chhattisgarh, GD $4\”&¢VVW Bilaspur. . 4w Petitioner - Lokendra Nath Hirwani, / S/o Late Shri Subanshlal Hirwam', Age— 57 years, Address — P.W.D. Sub-Divisibn, Gunderdehj, Division Balod, District- Durg . Versus Respondents The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through a Secretary, Public Works Department? D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Writ Petition Under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution Of India for the issuance of WRIT in the nature of MANDAMUS certiorari, Prohibition and for other suitable writ or writs, order J or orders, direction or directions. 1 : 1 t \f' W HIGH COURT OF CHHATTBGARH AT BILASFUR WP. No. 5005 of 2006 Petitioner Lokendra Nath Himani Versus Respondent V The State Govt. of Chhath'sgarh SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J $hri Ajay Shrivastava. Advocate for the petitioner. V, V. s. Munhy, Deputy Advocate General with Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt. Advocate fer the respondentslstate. 0 R D E R ( Passed on this 9‘“ day of March. 2007) The following order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. The petitioner while working as Sub Engineer in Public Works Department at Durg Division was transferred to Baiod Division. within the same district, on the same terms and conditions vide impugned order dated 30.6.2006 and 7.7.2006 (Annexure Pl1 and P/2). Thereafter. vide impugned order dated 7.9.2006 (Annexure PI5) the petitioner was transferred to Jashpur. 2. This Court vide interim order dated 13.9.2006 stayed the impugned transfer order, in respect of the petitioner. By virtue of the interim order the petitioner is working at the original place of posting. 3. Learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the respondents/State produced a copy of the order dated 7.3.2007, whereby the impugned transfer order dated 7.9.2006‘(Annexure P/5) has been canceiled. Copy of the order is taken on record. 4. in view of the fact that the impugned transfer order dated 7.9.2006 has been cancelled, nothing survives in this matter. 5. In view of the above, this petition stands dismmd. having become infructuous. No order as to costs. Sd/- i i Satish K. Agnihotr Jude Thakur i g \