IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2010 / 30TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 1488 of 2010(I) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------- MARY, AGED 65 YEARS, D/O.AINIKKAL KANNATH KUNJUVARKEY, KONNAKUZHI DESOM, PARIYARAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. MR.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR, SMT.P.A.ANITHA. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. CICILY, W/O.AINIKKAL KANNATH VARGHESE, EDAYATTUR DESOM, ALATHUR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. 4. NOBLE, S/O.AINIKKAL KANNATH VARGHESE, AINIKKAL KANNATH,EDAYATTHUR, ALATHUR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. 5. PINKIL, S/O.AINIKKAL KANNATH VARGHESE& CICILY, EDAYATTHUR, ALATHUR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. 6. TWINKLE, S/O.AINIKKAL KANNATH VARGHESE & CICILY, EDAYATTHUR, ALATHUR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPRUAM TALUK. 7. TOBLE, S/O.AINIKKAL KANNATH VARGHESE & CICILY, EDAYATTHUR, ALATHUR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER MR. R. LAKSHMI NARAYAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/01/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. P.R.RAMAN & P.S.GOPINATHAN, JJ. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= W.P.(C) No. 1488of 2010 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= Dated this the 20th day of January, 2010 JUDGMENT Raman, J. Petitioner, aged 65 years, has filed this writ petition seeking police protection from the party respondents. 2. According to the averments made in the writ petition, despite the decree in favour of the petitioner, as evidenced by Ext.P1, the party respondents are causing obstruction to the peaceful living of the petitioner in the old building which exists in the property. 3. Admittedly, she filed an Execution Petition, pursuant to the decree, and Ext.P2 order was passed by the court below. There is a clear finding in paragraph 8 of Ext.P2 that no cogent evidence was adduced to prove obstruction with respect to residence in 10/273 the old building. 4. In view of the above finding, if the petitioner is aggrieved, her remedy is to take up the matter either by W.P.(C) No. 1488/2010 2 way of an appeal or revision, as provided under law. We cannot enter a different finding from what entered into by the civil court in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Constrained with the above circumstance, we dismiss the writ petition. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE. mn.