@ CF/aaZ/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (6 No...5§5i?~2006 PETITIONER : Ashok Kumar Shandilya S/o I Shri Ramadhar ’ Shandilya, aged about 26 years, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Madanpur, Janpad-Panchyat Pali, District-Korba (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary Panchyat & Rural Development Department D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Collector Korba Dist. Korba (C.G.) The Sub-Divisional Officer (R) Katghora Tahsil—Pali Dist. KOrba (C.G.) Tahsildar Pali Tahsil Pali Dist. Korba (C.G.) Prabhu Ram Yadav Secretary Gram Panchyat Madanpur, Dist. Korba (C.G.) Hemlal Up—Sarpanch Gram Panchyat Madanpur, Janpad RanchyatePali Dist. Korba (C.G.) Ramdulare Kanwar, Panch of Ward No.7. Babulal, Panch of ward No.8 Santram Kanwar, Panch ‘of ward No.3 :lO) Sumit kunwar, Panch of ward No.1. :11) Smt. Spana Devi, Panch of ward No.6. /:l2) Smt. Dhankunwar, Panch of ward No.2. ,r:l3) Ganesh Singh Kanwar, Panch \ of ward No.l6. 1/:14) Mohan Das, Panch of ward No.l8. ,:l5) Hinchha Ram Panch of ward No.11. ,:l6) Sawant Singh, Panch of ward No.10. ,«:17) Kumari Laxmi Raj, Panch of ward No. 12. (:18) Smt. Sushila Bai, Panch of ward No.20. “ : , S ® :19) Lambodar Das, Panch of ward No.l7, the (petitioner No.6 to 19 all resident of Gram Panchyat ' Madanpur, Janpad Panchyat Pali Dist . Korba (C . G . ) 226/227 OF THE COUNSTITUTION .OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF' CEERTIORARI, r MNDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS , DIRECTION OR ‘ DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERES: WRIT PETITION UNDER VARTICLE XI-HC-78 'EW, Wang,W $2 o {A} 'P‘ .7.?~...-. 117i zooé WWW(W) WWW WW§WW éswm mmm - T116: brief facts; are tha a proceeding under sub-Section (1) of'Section. 4O of the .M'.P.‘C.G.) Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, , petitioner before fhe Prescribed Authority(S\D.O. Korba, Dist 'ct~K0rba CG), in which, an order of removal of the petitio er was passed on. 11,9.2006. Thereafter, the petitio11er ch Henged this order in. Panchayat appeal No. 27-A/89-A(§)[2 05-2006 before the Collector, Korba. Alongwith the said a peal, he also filed an application for interim stay. By the imp 1g31ed order dated 19.9.2006, the Collector, after hearing the pe itioner, diSmissed his; application for interim stay a11d fixed t e matter for 10.10.2006. It is against this interim order, p ssed by Collector; me petitioner has filed this petition 1 ider Article 226/227 of the Constitution. of India. After arguing for son time, learned counsel for the ‘ petitioner submits that for tlre present lie is not pressing this ’ writ petitmn on men'ts and ‘ 26.9.2005 i Sh‘ri RS‘Patel, counsel for the pafjtioner. Shm' Anm Sac, Govemment Advocate for the State] respond€11fs No. 1 to 4 on adv ance copy. Heard 011 admission. stead. of passing some orders on ' merits, some directions he is ued to the Collector to dispose of the appeal at the earliest. i. }. XI-HC—22 S") HW,W,W mm 1N “P‘ 517?. WW W