IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 285 OF 2004 Union of India and Ors. .. Petitioners V/s. Dilip Waman Sawant & 3 Ors. .. Respondents None present for the Petitioners None present for the Respondents CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. S.P. KUKDAY, JJ. DATED : 17.03.2005. DATED : 17.03.2005. DATED : 17.03.2005. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. When the matter is called out, none present for the Petitioners. 2. We have perused the impugned order of Central Administrative Tribunal. We find from the judgment that the challenge as raised by the Respondents herein in their original application was also raised by other employees of the Railways in original application no. 2448 of 2001, wherein, the impugned order dated 14.8.2001 was quashed and set aside. Once that be the case, the Respondents also would be covered. We, therefore, do not find any error apparent in the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal. No interference called for. Petition dismissed. (F.I. REBELLO, J (F.I. REBELLO, J (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (S.P. KUKDAY, J (S.P. KUKDAY, J (S.P. KUKDAY, J.)