IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2010 / 11TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 16764 of 2010(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.K. STANLEY, HEALTH SUPERVISOR, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, THRIKKANNAPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, THRIKANNAPURAM, TAVANUR.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SECRETARY, HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE, BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, PONNANI, EDAPAL.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. SMT.B. MANJULETHA, LAB TECHNICIAN, PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, THRIKKANNAPURAM, TAVANUR.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.16764 OF 2010 (U) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the Ist day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is working as Health Supervisor in Primary Health Centre, Thrikkanapuram, Malappuram. He has been allotted a quarter. Petitioner says that there is a designated quarter to be allotted only to the Public Health Inspectors and that the said quarter is now under the occupation of a Lab Technician should be allotted to him. 2. Earlier he had a claim to that effect and he approached this court. This court passed Ext.P9 judgment directing that the matter shall be considered. Consequently the claim of the petitioner was considered by the District Medical Officer and the claim has been rejected by Ext.P10 order, stating that there is no designated quarter as claimed by the petitioner. 3. According to the petitioner the conclusion in Ext.P10 is incorrect. Petitioner has not produced any documents or materials in support of his contention. The specific contention in Ext.P10 is that there is no designated quarter. In the light of the findings in WPC.No.16764 /2010 :2 : Ext.P10 and in the absence of any documents produced by the petitioner to support his claim, I do not find anything illegal in Ext.P10 order. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/