IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 9TH OCTOBER 2009 / 17TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 19055 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- VEE YEM TRADE LINKS, 6/1513, IRUMBICHI, MATTANCHERRY, KOCHI-682 002, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, P.A.ABDUL WAHID, AGED 36 YEARS, SON OF P.A.ABDUL AZEEZ. BY ADV. SRI.H.B.SHENOY SRI.B.ASHOK SHENOY SMT.LAKSHMI B.SHENOY SRI.ABU MATHEW SRI.SOBHAN GEORGE SRI.THOMAS P.MAKIL SRI.K.V.GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 030. 2. THE ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER, KOCHI II CIRCLE, FORT VYPIN, AZHEEKAL P.O., KOCHI. 3. COCHIN THURUMUGHA THOZHILALI UNION (CTTU), REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, BRISTOW ROAD, WILLINGDON ISLAND, KOCHI-682 003. 4. KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD, MATTANCHERRY LOCAL COMMITTEE, MATTANCHERRY, KOCHI- 682 002., REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. ADV. SRI.B.N.SHIVSANKAR FOR R3 SRI.KOSHY GEORGE, SC, KHLWWB FOR R4 G.P. SHRI.MOHAMMED HASHIM, THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.19055 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 9th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed by an establishment employing headload workers of their own, who are registered under Rule 26A of the Kerala Headload Workers Rules. The order granting registration to the workers was challenged in an appeal before the 1st respondent. By Ext.P11 order, the 1st respondent set aside the registration on the ground that before granting registration, the 4th respondent was not given notice and hearing as required under Rule 26A, holding that it would be open to the workers to file fresh applications before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner is challenging that order. I do not think that I can entertain this writ petition at the instance of the petitioner in so far as what has been cancelled is the registration in favour of the workers, who are not before me either as petitioners or as respondents. If the workers are aggrieved by the cancellation of their registration, it is for them to challenge Ext.P11 order. Therefore, without prejudice to such right, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2