Lsp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 1213 of 1990 Priya Kamlakar Torane ...Plaintiff V/s. Padmaja V. Alurkar & Ors. ...Defendants Sanket Sethia i/b. Apte & Co. for the plaintiff CORAM CORAM CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J : R.Y.GANOO, J : R.Y.GANOO, J 20th 20th 20th August, 2008 August, 2008 August, 2008 P.C. . Learned Advocate for the plaintiff states that a letter was sent to the plaintiff intimating her about the date. The letter has come back. On last 3-4 occasions plaintiff is not appearing before the Court. She is also not instructing Advocate. It is clear that plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the Suit. Learned Advocate for the plaintiff applied for time to take discharge. Since plaintiff is not instructing the Advocate, Advocate is in difficulties. It is clear that plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the Suit. She is also not interested in contacting his Advocate. . The Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, (R.Y.GANOO, (R.Y.GANOO, J) J) J)