HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE: Appeal Suit Nos. 1229 of 2002, 97 of 2003 & 1485 of 2002 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 36. 06.03.2025 RNT, J & MRK, J Sri K.S Gopala Krishnan, learned Senior Counsel representing the learned counsel for the appellants in A.S No.1229 of 2002, submits that they are aggrieved by the decree and judgment passed in O.S No.501 of 1991. The plaintiff has filed the present appeal. He further submits that defendant No.3 in the suit had filed cross objections, which were also rejected and against which the defendant No.3 has filed A.S No.1485 of 2002. He further submits that the defendant No.3 also filed O.S No.375 of 1991, with respect to one of the properties of the O.S No.501 of 1991, which was dismissed against which defendant No.3 filed A.S No.97 of 2003. 2. Against these two appeals i.e., A.S No.97 and 2003 & A.S No.1485 of 2002, there is no representation neither for the appellant nor for the respondents, today. 3. Post on 27.03.2025. 4. If the learned counsel for the respondents is not present on the next date, the Court may proceed ex-parte Cont…2 2 against them. If the learned counsel for the appellants is not present, those appeals may be dismissed for non- prosecution. ______ RNT, J ______ MRK, J GVK/RNS