IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2011 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 36979 of 2010(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- AHAMMAD ASHRAF, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O. (LATE) AHAMMED MUSTHAFA, THOTTATHIL KOTTAPURATH RABY MANZIL, MARAMPILLY P.O., CHALACKAL, ALUVA. BY ADV. SRI.ASWIN GOPAKUMAR SRI.PRAVEEN.H. SRI.ANWIN GOPAKUMAR SMT.KALA G.NAMBIAR RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682 030. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, MARAMPILLY, ERNAKULAM, PIN-683 107. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MR. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 36979 OF 2010 ......................................................................... Dated this the 23rd March, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this court with the following prayers: “i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order commanding the respondents to act upon the application dated 03.11.2007 submitted by the petitioner to effect mutation of the Revenue and Land Records in the light of Ext.P1 Partition deed, within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court; and ii. To pass such other order or reliefs as this Hon'ble court deems fit, in the interest of justice.” 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the application preferred by the petitioner for effecting transfer of registry in the relevant records has already been accepted as borne by Ext. P5. The petitioner is constrained to approach this court because of non-finalisation of the proceedings whereby W.P.(C) No. 36979 OF 2010 2 much loss and hardship are being caused to the petitioner . 3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not propose to go into the merits of the case. The respondents 2 and 3 are directed to consider the application preferred by the petitioner for effecting transfer of registry and to finalise Exts.P5/P6/P9 proceedings in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible at any rate within two months. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the said respondents for further steps. The Writ Petition is disposed of. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk