1 901 wp.9801.11 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9801 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. A.R.Thorat i/b Mr. P.J.Thorat for the Petitioners. Mr. Naresh Ratnani i/b Ashwin Ankhad and Associates for the Respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 16 th December, 2011. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners. 2 The Petitioners are the original Defendants. By the impugned order, delay of 85 days in preferring a substantive appeal against the decree has been condoned by the Appeal Bench of the Court of Small Causes. The submission of the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners is that there was no sufficient cause made out. The Appellate Court has given reasons for condoning the delay of 85 days. This is not the case where interference can be made 2 901 wp.9801.11 in exercise of powers of superintendence under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the petition is rejected. [ A.S.OKA, J ]