IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51209 of 2008 Chhotu Singh @ Sanjiv Kr. Singh @ Sanjiv Kumar, son of Brij Mohan Singh, resident of Village- Madhe, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad. -----Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Bihar……………………………………….Opposite Party. -With Cr.Misc. No.51369 of 2008 1. Arjun Singh, son of Suresh Singh. 2. Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Kr. Singh son of Arjun Singh. Both residents of Village- Madhe, P.S. Navinagar, District- Aurangabad………………………………………………….Petitioners. -Versus- The State of Bihar………………….……………………Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 16. 03.2009. Heard the counsel for the petitioners, State and the informant. Offences alleged are under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 307, 379 and 514 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the F.I.R. petitioners Chhotu Singh @ Sanjiv Kr. Singh @ Sanjiv Kumar in (Cr. Misc. No. 51209 of 2008) and Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Kr. Singh assaulted the informant with Iron rod and petitioner Arjun Singh in (Cr. Misc. No. 51369 of 2008) assaulted the informant with Khanti and also snatched away golden chain and Mobile phone of Bhim Singh. Counsel for the petitioners submits that because of land dispute altercation took place in which persons from both sides received injuries. So far Mantu Singh and Bhim Singh are concerned, they received minor injuries caused by hard and blunt substance. On the other hand, in the complaint case filed by the petitioners, injuries are grievous. - 2 - Considering these facts, prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of Chhotu Singh @ Sanjiv Kr. Singh @ Sanjiv Kumar in (Cr. Misc. No. 51209 of 2008) and petitioner no.1 Arjun Singh in (Cr. Misc. No. 51369 of 2008) is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, the petitioner Chhotu Singh @ Sanjiv Kr. Singh @ Sanjiv Kumar in (Cr. Misc. No. 51209 of 2008) and petitioner no.1 Arjun Singh in (Cr. Misc. No. 51369 of 2008) are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Aurangabad in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 132 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. (Mridula Mishra,J)