: 1 : 4887-11-wp=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4887 OF 2011 R.Y. Pawar & Ors. .. Petitioners v/s. Subhash Ganpati Shewale & Ors. .. Respondents ......... Mr. S.J. Ghogare for the petitioners Mr. S.S.Kulkarni for the respondents ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER,2011. P.C. : 1. The present respondents had filed Special Civil Suit No. 477 of 2005 in the Court of learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane for reliefs against such of the flat purchaser who were not prepared to go for redevelopment as also against CIDCO as the land on which the buildings were originally constructed by CIDCO. The respondent nos. 1 to 7 have applied for amendment of the plaint in the year 2011 and that amendment application has been granted by the learned trial Judge by the impugned order which is challenged in this petition. : 2 : 4887-11-wp=.sxw 2. I have heard learned advocates on both sides. At the stage of admission, it was sought to be contended that on account of amendment, the frame of the suit will be changed and some new reliefs are sought which were not contemplated at the time of filing of the suit. All the objections raised by the petitioners so as to challenge the impugned order are considered. It is noticed that the suit came to be filed in the year 2005. It is pending in the Court. Thereafter, substantial development have taken place as regards status of the building as well as various Notifications issued by CIDCO as well as Government Authority. In order to cover all the change of circumstances, the present amendment is sought. Having perused the impugned order and having considered the text of the amendment, it is noticed that in order to resolve the principal dispute between the plaintiffs original plaintiff nos. 1 to 6 being flat holders and original defendant nos. 2 to 17 being other set of the flat holders, it would be convenient to allow the amendment. Hence, no interference is required in the impugned order. Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)