Civil Revision No.3999 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.3999 of 2009 Date of Decision:-July 24,2009 M/s Selz.Business House ....Petitioner Versus Sat Pal Jain and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reports or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported to the Digest? Present: Shri Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Gurpreet Singh, Advocate for the respondents. ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral): The petitioner is aggrieved at the order dated 12.5.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh whereby his evidence has been ordered to be closed. Notice of motion was issued and pursuant thereto, counsel for the parties have been heard. Counsel for the petitioner submits that given one opportunity, the petitioner shall produce his remaining evidence at his own responsibility. He is also willing to compensate the respondents with suitable costs. Having regard to all the attending circumstances and the Civil Revision No.3999 of 2009 2 stand taken by the petitioner, the revision petition is allowed in part to the extent that in the interest of justice, the petitioner is directed to be given one more opportunity to lead his entire evidence, which he shall bring at his own responsibility. The said opportunity shall be granted to the petitioner on payment of costs of Rs.5000/-. The Rent Controller shall endeavor to give the last opportunity to the petitioner as early as possible and preferably within two weeks. Dasti. (Surya Kant) Judge 24.7.2009 AS