Q> AMENDED PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.} W.P.227 704/09 PETITIONER PLAINTIFF RESPONDENTS DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF Krishna Bai W/o Late Golamal Aged about 67 yrs, Caste sachdev R/o Takhatpur, Tehsil Takhatpur District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1) Dhanraj S/o Chuhadmal Tolani Aged about 48 yrs 2) Smt.Padma Devi W/o Karamchand Tekwani Aged about 40 yrs RespondentNo.l & 2 both R/o Takhatpur, Tehsil Takhatpur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3) Mahesh Kumar S/o Avatmal Sindhi Aged about 46 yrs R/o S.K.Sugandhi Bhandar, Barhiroad, Katni, Tehsil Katai, District Jabalpur (M.P.) 4) Ashok Kumar S/o Golamal Sachdev Aged about 47 years 5) Santosh Kumar S/o Golamal Sachdev Aged about 26 years Both Respondent No.4 & 5 are R/o Takhatpur, Tehsil Takhatpur Disto-ict Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA 3/ :-HC—78 ^WRC^^RT^ ^'5T '-^l^Kri'4, ^TTK-i'iKo, [sj<rti'H^< ^..w..^^..^....'%^ 3TT^?t TT^T (^°ff3^t?) ^i^r'^Tt^N' ?[^T WC^T ^^[W ^(-^ ^^TW^f^ 3TT^T S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice PrashantKumar KIishra Fstor^anf 15.11.2010. Shri Neeraj Choubey, counsel The tria! Court directed the This peti^on is pending since Interim order. During pendency of dismissed and ihereafter a Misceil petitioner has aiso been clismissed In yiew of this staternent petitioner, the snstant wsit petition has| $t is accordingly dismissed as tie ^N<?T?N ^I^ff ^ ~feTZt ^N^K ^^tRm^n^T for the petitioner. p^lftioner io pay adequate Court fee. ^ary, 2(X)9 without there being any petitton the suit Iteetf has been l|aneous Ap^aS preferred by the b^thtsCourt. by Searned counsel for ttie jbecome infructuous. l{aving become infrucUious. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge 4--