IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 13147 of 2010 Rajesh Manuja & others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Shruti Jain, DAG, Haryana for the State. RANJIT SINGH J. The petitioners are wanting action in an F.I.R., which was registered in view of the facts and circumstances narrated in the writ petition. In response, the State has come up with a stand that so far no action has been taken to cancel the F.I.R. In my view, the petitioners may have the cause to approach any appropriate forum once any decision is taken to cancel the F.I.R. The writ petition is, therefore, premature and is dismissed accordingly. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to take any appropriate action in accordance with law, in case there is any grievance on account of cancellation of F.I.R. or for taking action against any person responsible. January 25 , 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE