IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-17762 of 2010 Date of Decision: 27.04.2011 Smt. Sonia and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Navneet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sidharth Sarup, D.A.G., Haryana for the respondent-State. Mr. Vikram Punia, Advocate for respondent No.4. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to provide adequate security/protection to the petitioners for the safety of their life and liberty against respondent No.4, who is the father of petitioner No.1. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 states that he has instructions to state that respondent No.4 has no objection to the marriage of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No.4, no further order is required to be passed. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 27.04.2011 JUDGE gurpreet