THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.25564 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner claims to have worked as Prerak under a Scheme that was being operated in the State of Andhra Pradesh for the spread of informal education. That scheme was replaced by Saakshar Bharat and the method of implementation thereof is provided under G.O.Rt.No.203, dated 13.04.2010. It contemplates appointment of Coordinators at District, Mandal and Village levels. The authorities for appointment at various stages is also provided for. Preference is given to the persons who worked earlier as Preraks. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Srikakulam, respondent No.4 herein, addressed a letter, dated 03.09.2010, directing the Sarpanch and Chairman of Saakshar Bharat, respondent No.5 herein, to appoint the petitioner as Coordinator. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.5 has not taken any steps so far. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. In G.O.Rt.No.203, dated 13.04.2010, the method of appointment and the appointing authority at various levels are prescribed. The appointing authority for Village Coordinators is a Committee comprising of the President of the Village Organization, the Panchayat Secretary and the Headmaster of the local school. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer figures as a member of the Selection Committee of Coordinators at Mandal level. He has absolutely no role to play in the appointment of Village Coordinators. Respondent No.4 has committed patent illegality in addressing the letter, dated 03.09.2010. It amounts to interference with the powers vested in the Committee at village level. Such a letter does not create any right upon the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.08.10.2010. kdl