IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 177 OF 2006 SHRI VIDHYANAND BHANDARI AND 11 ....Petitioners ORS., Versus THE GOA FOREST DEPT. CORPORATION ....Respondent LTD., THROUGH ITS MANAGER, MR. VINAYAK A. NAIK Mr. V. P. Thali, Advocate for the Petitioners. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 28th April, 2006 P.C.: Mr. Thali, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners, upon taking instructions from his clients, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. However, Mr. Thali states that the trial Court be directed to expedite the hearing of the Suit since the petitioners are poor and and depending on the income derived from the cashew plantation. I am not inclined to pass an order of expedition. However, it is made clear that if an application for expedition of the suit is filed by the petitioners, the trial Court may consider the same on its own merits. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn subject to the observations made above. Accordingly the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. A. P. LAVANDE, J. sl.