1 cp-37.10 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 37 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri Niranjan Pandit along with Ms Vijaylaxmi Kulkarni i/by Nanu Hormasjee & Co. for the Petitioner. Shri P.K. Dhakephalkar, Sr. Advocate and Gargi Bhagwat i/by M/s.Divekar & Co. for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 22ND DECEMBER, 2010 P.C.: . Learned counsel appearing for the Respondents states that the challenge in the appeal preferred by the Respondents to the State Government ( Page 70 of the Petition ) is confined to the order dated 2nd January, 2009 passed by the Municipal Corporation by which the application for regularisation made by the Respondents has been rejected. He also stated that in the said appeal, there is no challenge to the order of Assistant Municipal Commissioner which is referred to in Paragraph 5 of the order of this Court dated 8th August, 2008. The statements are accepted. 2 cp-37.10 2. In view of the aforesaid statements, no case is made out to proceed further under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The Petition is disposed of. (A.S.OKA, J)