IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7032 of 2011 INDRAJEET YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 06.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Allegedly, 56 Kg. Ganja kept in several bags were recovered from the room of the petitioner. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is not residing at his village rather he is residing at village- Sugaha Bhawanipur Briha Tola, District-West Champaran. It is further contented by him that the above stated recovery has been made from abundant house that is why none of the person of the family of the petitioner was found present there. It is also contended by him that several mandatory provisions of N.D.P.S. Act have been violated by police in this case. It is also pointed out by him that according to the prosecution case itself, the FIR was registered on 6.12.2009 but admittedly the aforesaid FIR was sent to concerned court on 10-12-2009 and no explanation of the aforesaid delay has been given. Taking into consideration the above stated submissions as well as this aspect of the matter that in huge quantity the ganja has been recovered from 2 the room of the petitioner, I do not feel it proper to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Kangli P.S. Case No.28 of 2009 stands rejected. However, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after one year from the date of this order, if trial of the petitioner is not concluded within the above stated period. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)