- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL REVISION REVISION REVISION APPLICATION NO.265 OF 2009 APPLICATION NO.265 OF 2009 APPLICATION NO.265 OF 2009 Mahendre Dhanji Haria ...Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Ms Mallika Ingale for the applicant Mr. Sunil Sharma for the respondent no.2 CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : APRIL 29,2009 : APRIL 29,2009 : APRIL 29,2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Not on board. Taken on board. 1. Leave to amend. The learned Advocate for the applicant and the second respondent have placed on record the consent terms duly signed by the parties. The consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. It is stated that the applicant and the second respondent are personally present in this court. Parties admit correctness of the contents of the consent terms. 2. Hence, revision application is disposed of by passing the following order : i) Impugned Judgments and orders are quashed and set aside and the applicant is acquitted of the offences alleged against him. - 2 - ii) The applicant is permitted to withdraw a sum of Rs.31,000/- deposited by him in the court of learned Magistrate. He is also entitled to withdraw a cash security more particularly described in clause 4 of the consent terms. iii) Parties and the concerned court to act upon authenticated copy of this order. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE