HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11551 of 2008 Date : 07.07.2011 Between : Vivaram Anuradha & others. …..Petitioners And State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Principal Secretary to Revenue Department & others. …..Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11551 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking directions by way of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents in insisting the petitioners to vacate the lands admeasuring Ac.4.50 cents in Sy.Nos.392, 392/5, 392/10, 392/11, 392/12 and 392/14 of Pernamitta village, for providing house sites to the people belonging to weaker sections, as illegal and arbitrary. It is the case of the petitioners that, as they are landless poor persons, they were granted D-Form pattas in respect of the aforesaid lands, and that they are in possession of the same. It is their grievance that on the ground that said lands were required for the purpose of providing house sites to the weaker section people, respondents are taking steps to evict them without following due process of law. A detailed counter affidavit is filed by the respondents. In the counter affidavit, while denying the various allegations made by the petitioners, it is stated that as the petitioners have violated the conditions of grant of D-Form patta, orders of resumption were passed on 15.04.2008, in proceedings Rc.A.226/2007. Although it is the case of petitioners that they are the original assignees, in view of the resumption orders passed by the respondents, they cannot claim for continuance of possession without questioning such resumption orders. The validity of resumption orders is not under challenge in the writ petition. In view of the order, dated 15.04.2008, passed in proceedings No.Rc.A.226/2007, as referred in the counter affidavit, the petitioners are not entitled for the relief as sought for in the writ petition. However, as it is submitted that the orders of resumption are not served on the petitioners and they intend to prefer appeal against such orders, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the lands in question, for a period of two months from today, and if the petitioners are aggrieved of the resumption orders, it is open for them to question the same within the said period of two months. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. _____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 7th July 2011 N.B: Issue C.C. in one week. (b/o) ajr