HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.34252 of 2011 Date: 27-12-2011 Between Smt. P.V.Shoba and another … Petitioners and The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy district and 3 others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.34252 of 2011 Order: Heard Sri M.Adam, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents 1 and 2. 2. This writ petition, which is filed seeking a direction against the 2nd respondent i.e. the Station House Officer, L.B.Nagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy district, to take action against the respondents 3 and 4, is misconceived. The petitioners claim to be absolute owners and co-sharers of land admeasuring Ac.9-30 guntas in Survey Nos.26 and 28/AA situated at Jillelaguda village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy district. It is stated that they filed O.S.No.24 of 2007 on the file of the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy district at L.B.Nagar for partition and separate possession and accordingly obtained a decree. As pleaded, the grievance of the petitioners is that the unofficial respondents 3 and 4 forcibly trespassed into the said land and are making attempts to proceed with construction work illegally by putting the petitioners under threat. The petitioners, therefore, sought the assistance of the 2nd respondent. They complain that even though the unofficial respondents 3 and 4 have no rights and are not entitled for the aforesaid land, they cannot proceed with construction work by illegally trespassing into the said land. 3. The pleadings as above and the cause shown in the writ petition eminently displays that the dispute is civil nature. If the unofficial respondents 3 and 4 have trespassed and are attempting to make construction illegally, the petitioners are not without any remedy and they can always approach a competent Court of law to prevent the alleged illegal activities of the unofficial respondents 3 and 4. The 2nd respondent has no role in the matter. 4. For the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition is devoid of merits and is dismissed at the stage of admission. This order, however, does not prevent the petitioners to approach a competent civil Court for appropriate relief. 5. In view of disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.42631 2011 is dismissed as unnecessary. No costs. ___________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. 27th December, 2011. Ak HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.34252 of 2011 27th December, 2011. (Ak)