es C ^lw ^ IN THE HI6H COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fd N0. %7&'x- of 2007 PETITIONER ;^ Shiv Narayan Shukla, son of Late Nand Kishore Shukla, ^ aged about 52 years, resident ^y ^?' '•€< ^^^ ^^y ,.tP''....-bf b-19, Shankar Nagar, \o }•'' Raipur, working as Assistant 6rade-II, C.G, State Rurat Oevelopment &epar'tmeht, Nimora, Raipur. ':,tt' Vs RESPONDENTS y r^v •^ ^ TT. ^^ ^^ ]^y^ aB.wu-ae^ ^••s^^.,^' 'ff^. f^^'^' ..-•^'- -^^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, tlirpugh the Secretary, Ministry of (Sener'al AdminJstration Department, Secretdriat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. 2. C.6. Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited, Transport Cell, Bus Stand, Pandri, Raipur. 3. Shiv Vallabh Sharma, Upper bivision Clerk, Divisional Officer, C.6. Infrastructure bevelopment Corporation Limited, Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INblA lPR^€@0PY ^ .f-y^? ^* t- KIOH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 2752 of2007 PETITIONER : Shiv Nai-ayaii Shukla. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of'Chhattisgarh & Others. 'A/RITPEHriQNijNDER_ARTICLE226/227_QFTHECONSTITm:10N. OFINDIA SB: Hon'ble Slui Satish K. Agiiiliotri, J. Present; Siiri Kshitij Sharma, Advocate for the petitioaer. Sfari Shashaiik TSiakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1. Shri Aiiup Majumdar, Advocate for the respondetit No.2. None forthe respondeat No. 3. (Passed on 20" day of October, 2010} ¥- 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, subniits that this petition has become mtructuous as the petitioner has already vacated the premises in dispute. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the above subnsission. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as havin; become infructuous. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judae Amit