IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 392 of 2010 Date of decision: 10.11.2010 Surinder Kumar …Petitioner. Versus Rajinder Kumar & others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate. For the respondents: None. Deepak Gupta, J. (Oral) 1. This petition is directed against the order dated 19.08.2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Solan, whereby the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the plaintiff') has been directed to produce the original partnership deed of M/s Paragon Enterprises. 2. Mr. Rahul Mahajan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, states that the plaintiff does not deny the correctness of the partnership deed, copy of which has been filed by the defendant before the learned trial Court and admits 1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes. -: 2 :- the same to be correct. Therefore, this partnership deed is admitted by the plaintiff and there is no need for production of the original partnership deed. 3. In view of the above statement of Mr. Rahul Mahajan, made on instructions from his client, admitting the correctness of the copy of the partnership deed, there is no need for production of the original partnership deed. The order of the learned trial Court is accordingly modified. 4. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs. (Deepak Gupta) Judge November 10, 2010 (rajni)