IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.3825 of 2010 Janardan Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ----------- 2 13.10.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, Mr. Parth Sarthy, learned counsel for the Nagar Parishad as also the learned counsel appearing for the State. Learned counsel appearing for the Nagar Parishad submits that the admitted retiral dues have been paid to the petitioner, however petitioner is not entitled to pension since at the relevant time petitioner did not exercise the option. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since notices was not duly published at the material time for exercising the option, and as such, petitioner cannot be disentitled to receive the pension. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the order passed with respect to the petitioner is not correct, and as such, petitioner proposes to assail the same before the appropriate forum. Be that as it may, since the order has been passed with respect to the claim of the petitioner for retiral dues, the contempt application need not proceed further. The MJC application accordingly stands disposed of. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)