IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22526 of 2002 Between: V.Shourie Reddy, S/o.Chinnapa Reddy, Hindu, Male, R/o.M.I.G. B-152, Sagarnagar, Visakhapatanam. ..... PETITIONER AND The Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority, Rep. by its Chairman, Visakhapatanam. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.N.(P).ANJANA DEVI, SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the respondent: SMT. V.PREETHI REDDY The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Impugned Order in Rc.No.1500/92/R.I.I, dated:28.10.2002 passed by the respondent as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and Violative of Article 14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution of the India and also violative of Condition No.12 of the Terms and Conditions attached to allotment Order and also Condition No.22 of the Licence Deed and also violative of the Resolution passed by the respondent in the Resolution No.365, dated:27.3.1999 and consequently to set aside the Impugned Order and direct the respondent to extend the period of lease/license for a further period of 3 yrs., on enhanced rent at 35% originally agree upon.” At the hearing, Smt. N.Anjana Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as such. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 24th FEBRUARY, 2009. kvni