1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12924 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 25128 OF 2009 Godawari marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation .. Applicant Versus Shankar Narayan Kamble and another .. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12928 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 25158 OF 2009 Godawari marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation .. Applicant Versus Bhagwan Bhudhaji Bhakre and another .. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12933 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 24938 OF 2009 Godawari marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation .. Applicant Versus 2 Jariba Shamrao Ghadsing and another .. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12949 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 25147 OF 2009 Godawari marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation .. Applicant Versus Padmabai Karbhari Kamble and another.. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12936 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 25166 OF 2009 Godawari marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation .. Applicant Versus Arjun Mariba Ghadsing and another .. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12922 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 25153 OF 2009 Godawari marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation .. Applicant Versus 3 Yada Ganpati Athave-died-L.R.s' Tulsai Yada Athave and others .. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12931 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 25134 OF 2009 Godawari marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation .. Applicant Versus Ankush Bhiva Patole and another .. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12945 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 25192 OF 2009 Godawari marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation .. Applicant Versus Vithal Ukandi Adayale and another .. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12941 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 25162 OF 2009 Godawari marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation .. Applicant 4 Versus Rama Dagdu Thorat - died - L.R.s Shantabai Rama Thorad and others .. Respondents Smt. Dr. Kalpalata Patil-Bharaswadkar for the Applicant in all matters. Shri D. R. Jaybhar, Advocate for the Respondent No 1 in all matters. The Assistant Government Pleader, for the Respondent/State in all matters. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2010. PER COURT : . These are the applications filed by the acquiring body for condonation of delay. The acquiring body was not party before the Reference Court. As such, acquiring body did not have the knowledge of the award passed by the Reference Court. In view of that, the delay has been caused. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the fact that, the present applicant was not party to the proceeding, as such there was no cause for them to have the knowledge of the award passed by the 5 Reference Court and for the reasons stated in the application, the applications are allowed. The delay is condoned. The civil applications are disposed of. [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/Sept. 10