1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2769 OF 2009 Shivaji S/o Anna Kedar Versus State of Maharashtra *** Mr. S. R. Kedar, Advocate for the Applicant,. Mr. D. R. Korde, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** 1. Heard learned counsel for the accused/ applicant. The applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in Crime No.58 of 2009 registered at Yermala Police Station for the offence under section 392 of Indian Penal Code. 2. His application for such release is rejected by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad on 6th July, 2009. 3. Considering the controversy, prima facie, it appears that there is no role of the accused/ applicant to attract section 392 of Indian Penal Code. The accused/ applicant hails from the same village and he has no criminal record. In the situation, without further adverting to the details, following order: 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 4. In the event of arrest of the accused/ applicant, in Crime No.58 of 2009 the accused/ applicant be released on his furnishing P.R.Bond and surety in the sum of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees ten thousands only]. 5. The accused/ applicant shall attend the investigator on every Sunday between 09.00 a.m. to 04.00 p.m. till filing of the charge sheet. The order to remain in force till filing of charge sheet. Application disposed of. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:28/08/2009. ans/2769