CRM No. M 9739 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 9739 of 2010 Date of decision: 27.07.2010 Davneet Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Jaspreet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Ms Priyanka Dalal, AAG, Haryana for the respondent - State Mr. Bejender Dhankar, Advocate for the complainant -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 110 dated 26.04.2008 under Section 379, 419, 420, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Sarai Khawaja, District Faridabad. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no evidence to show that the present petitioner introduced Gurmej Singh, the alleged person who impersonated the real owner of the property in question. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner CRM No. M 9739 of 2010 2 that he was enroped only due to the fact that the brother of the complainant, namely, Surender Singh Sokhi is looked after by the present petitioner when he visited India and the said Surender Singh Sokhi is in litigation with his real brother-Gurmej Singh, the owner of the property in question. Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Balbir Singh admits that the petitioner has not signed any where to identify the said Gurmej Singh. It is also admitted that the present petitioner has joined investigation. In view of the above, the order dated 05.04.2010 passed by this Court is made absolute. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 27.07.2010 mohan