THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA C.R.P. No. 1727 of 2010 O r d e r: This C.R.P. is directed against the order dated 09.04.2010 passed by the I Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, 31.03.2008, allowing the application in I.A. No. 2642 of 2009 in I.A. No. 3241 of 2008 in I.A. No. 2189 of 2008 in O.S. No. 686 of 2008, filed by respondent No.1 praying to amend the figure in the order from Rs.24,00,000/- to Rs.2,40,00,000/-. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for respondent No.1 and perused the order under revision. Respondent No.1-plaintiff filed the suit for partition contending that he is entitled to 1/30th share, which comes to 800 Sq. yds. The value of the land was fixed by the Court below at Rs.30,000/- per square yard, and at that rate, the value of 800 square yards of land, was worked out at Rs.2,40,00,000/-. However, in the order and decree dated 09.10.2009, the value of the land was mentioned as Rs.24,00,000/-. As there was arithmetical error in the calculation, respondent No.1-plaintiff filed the present application, and the Court below, by reason of the order under revision, allowed the same. Though the petitioner-defendant contends that the amount of Rs.24,00,000/- mentioned in the impugned order is correct, and that the said amount that was directed to be deposited by the Court below, is as an interim measure till the suit for partition is disposed of, but the fact remains, the Court below, which passed the order and decree, found that there was an arithmetical error in calculating the value of the land, and that the actual value of the land comes to Rs. 2,40,00,000/-, and that by mistake, in the order and decree, the value of the land was mentioned as Rs.24,00,000/- instead of Rs.2,40,00,000/-, and having found so, ordered that in the order dated 09.10.2009, wherever the figure Rs.24,00,000/- is found, the same shall be substituted by Rs.2,40,00,000/-, and no exception can be taken thereto. In the above view of the matter, I find no reason whatsoever to interfere with the order under revision in exercise of revisional power under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The C.R.P. is devoid of merit, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________ N.V.RAMANA, J Dated: 26th October, 2010 KSR