-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 122, 121 AND 123 OF 2009 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NOS. 76, 77 AND 78 OF 2009 Smt. Archana Anil Patil ... Appellant versus Anil Harischandra Patil ....Respondent Mr. Pramod N. Patil for the applicant. Mr. S.P. Kadam for the respondent. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & R.V. MORE, JJ. DATE: OCTOBER 08, 2009. P.C. We have heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the respondent. Considering the fact that decree of divorce is granted by the Family Court on the ground of adultery and even the son of the applicant wife has also given evidence in this behalf, in our view, the interim relief as prayed for in these Civil Applications cannot be granted. It is also required to be noted that the prayer regarding asking the respondent husband to vacate the premises which was also prayed for in the petition cannot be granted at this stage. On going through the judgment of the Family Court as well as on going through the evidence on record, prima facie we are of the opinion that the applicant wife has not made out any case for getting interim -2- relief as prayed for. Considering the said aspect, in our view, no prayer as prayed for can be granted. The prayer regarding maintenance as well as for residence, therefore, cannot be granted at this stage. However, the only limited stay is granted to the extent that the husband shall not re-marry during the pendency of these appeals. The learned counsel for the husband has fairly stated that the respondent-husband is not going to re-marry during the pendency of these appeals. All these Civil Applications are accordingly disposed of in view of what is stated above. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. R.V. MORE, J.