:1: :1: :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8710 OF 2006 Samita Rajesh Parab ...Petitioners Versus Rajesh Anant Parab ....Respondents M.V.Sawant for the petitioners. S.P.Kadam for the respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 30th 30th 30th November, 2007 November, 2007 November, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. There is no warrant for interfering with the impugned order as it is not the grievance of the petitioner wife that the same is not complied with. However, she submits that considering her and her child’s needs so also increased day to day expenses and rising prices the amount ought to have been more. To my mind, it is still open for the wife to apply for enhancement of the maintenance, If she is aggrieved by the fact that the maintenance as awarded in the order dated 17.7.2006 is inadequate and meagre. It is open to her to apply for further enhancement and such an application, if made,should be dealt with on its own merits and in accordance with law. Petition dismissed. sd/- :2: :2: :2: **********