^1'^'^^^'^.^^^SF'-.^^^^^^B-S^''7^^^7?^^^1^-^' t^ )) t IN THE HONiftBLE HIGH COURT OF ffiiHA'TTISGARH AT BIUSPUR SSCOViD KPSEKL SO. R^.^ / ZQo€ S .B. APPELLANT ^LAINTIBE' Pauhari Sharan Pandey son of Raj- Vallabh Pandey, agad about 32 years, Ex-constable, R/o. near Ovar bridge, Rajaandgaon (C*G.5s VERSOS RESPONDENTS ?END®iTS 8- ^ 1) S*P. Misbra son o£ S.S» Mishra, aged aboufe 86 ^ ars, sub-lnspec- fcor, P«S< Somni, Dlstrlct -• Rajnandgaon afe pssant posted as Sub-lnspeefeor Aadim Jati, Janjafci Kalyan Thana, Rajnand- gaon (G.O.)v 2)' oopal son of TUluram Yadav, aged about 4S years. %lrJ.I^TU •^) KuinarJL Bai wl£e a£ Gcpal Yadav, aged about 38 years, Both R/o. near over bridge, Rajnandgaon (C.O*). 4) The Superintandant csE PolJ.ae, Rajnandgaon (C»s»). 5) The Steate of chhattisgarh Through- Collectw, Ra Jnandgaon (C.O•);' SECOND,Apr_EAL UNOER SECTION 100 OF CIVIL PR0CEDURE CODE, SECOND APPEAL TOiLUEE) AT S3.^ 3.000/- rrr-E XI-HC-78 3'sr^TpTi^ra', gTflti'is, [siciiuy s.frcpe) ^c. .^;i^ :'Ww74^1'"'f *<1*1MI Sh'fich 3TT^?r <raq? (lici'd°)^.]sr) 3n^r?;rR-ii+ craT31I^TsbX Kvr £1/11/2006 ??dTW flfscr 3'n^r n defauit. No order as to costs. tii'siFfi'in-i •<wi-iTffteiA'<(«i+<ii< ^arf^rsn^T None for the appellant Shri Akhil Agrawal, Panel Law^er for the State. None appears for the appellanf when the matter is called. Eariier in (he pre-lunch session the appellant w^s absent and no representation was (nade on his behalf when the matter t?as called as a result the matter was bassed over. Now at 3.10 P.M. when the n|iatter is called none appears for the ^ppellant and no representation was (nade on his behalf. Accordingly, this Second Appe|al (P.R.) No. 3119/20C^is dismissed Sd/- DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge