\LQ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. ‘2271 No. 6699 of 2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) s Prosent:- Mr, HB. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Meera Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Respondent not noticed, ORDER (Passed on 16/11/2011) 1. By this potitiou under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioner has challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 16/8/2011 passed by First Additional District Judge, Bilaspur (C.G.) in civil suit No. 109A/2011 whereby application filed under Section 35 of the Court Fees Act 8t. Section 17 8:. Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act has been dismissed. 2. Mr. H.B. Agiawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Meera Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner is heard. 3. Order impugned and copy of alleged document perused. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that alleged document is a partition deed which requires registration in proper stamp but Court below has dismissed the application filed on behalf of the petitioner. 5. Contents of alleged document Batawara Patra clearly reveal that they have already partitioned their property on 17/2/ 94 and deed PETITIONER Jagdish Prasad Gupta, S/o DEFENDANT Rambharosh Gupta, aged about 5O years, R/o Jagdish Kirana Store, Main Road, Mungeli Naka Bilaspur, Tahsil and Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENT] Rajesh Knrnar Gupta, S/o Laxmi PLAINTIFF Prasad Gupta, aged about 36 years, R/ o Main Road, Vishnunagar, Kududand, Bilaspur, Tahsil and Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). Consequently, by dismissing application filed on behalf of the petitioner Court below has not committed an illegality requiring any interference in exercise of supelvisory jutisdiction. Consequently, petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. Interim application stands disposed of: sd/_ T.P. Sharma Judge