IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1009 OF 2007 IN MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIM PETITION NO.54 OF 2001 Maruti Hari Golatkar ...Appellant Vs. Smt. Nivedita Digambar Warang & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Rajan K. Kakkara, Advocate for Appellant Ms. Leena R. Temkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 Ms. Yogini D. Ghawale, Advocate for Respondent No.5 Mr. N.M. Godbole, Advocate for Respondent N.6 Mr. S.M. Vidyarthi, Advocate for Respondent No.7 Respondent No. 2 present CORAM: SMT.ROSHAN DALVI,J. DATED: 7TH JUNE, 2007 P.C. 1. The Respondent No.2 is present. The Advocate appearing on behalf of Respondent nos. 1 to 4 upon taking instructions from Respondent No.2 makes a statement that the Respondents 1 to 4 do not desire to execute the decree. The Advocates for Respondents 5,6 and 7 state that they are not concerned with and are not affected by this statement. 2. In view of this statement the Appeal is disposed off as the Appellant does not press for any other reliefs. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)