IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 26TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 7TH PHALGUNA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1762 of 2008(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.34770/2007 Dated 26/11/2007 .................... PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.KUMARAN, RETIRED SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, NOW RESIDING AT 'VYSAKH', MADAKKATHANAM P.O.,MUVATTUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH B.MARAR SMT.LAKSHMI.N.KAIMAL RESPONDENT(S)/2ND & 3RD RESPONDENTS --------------- 1. K.JAYAKUMAR, (FATHER'S NAME AND ADDRESS ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. N.SASI, (FATHER'S NAME AND ADDRESS ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), CHIEF ENGINEER (IRRIGATION), GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.PUSHPALATHA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- C.O.C.1762/2008 -------------------- Dated this the 26th day of February, 2009 JUDGMENT Second respondent has filed an affidavit along with Annexure-R2(a) Government Order. It is observed as follows in the affidavit. It is submitted that pursuant to the issuance of Annexure-A2(a) order to regularize the suspension period of the petitioner from 5.11.1996 to 30.4.1997 as duty for all purposes limiting the pay and allowances to subsistence allowance already paid subject to the conclusion of the proceedings in Contempt Case No.54/2002 in which an appeal was recommended. It is submitted that pursuant to the issuance of G.O.(Rt). No.1365/08/WRD.dated 26.12.2008 this respondent has issued absolute Non- Liability Certificate dated 18.2.2009 in favour of Sri.A.Kumaran the petitioner and forwarded the same to the Chief Engineer (Project II), the pension sanctioning authority. On the very same day itself a letter has been issued vide C.O.C.1762/2008 2 No.A1-8380/98 dated 18.2.2009 for taking immediate action for disbursing his pending pensionery benefits” In view of the above, no further issue survives in the Contempt of Court case and accordingly, the same is closed. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs