1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.41 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5002 OF 2008 (Natthu Kisanji Giripunje and another vs. State of Maharashtra and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri Jain, Advocate for the appellants. Shri A.S. Fulzele, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent nos. 1 to 3. ------- CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE AND P.B.VARALE, JJ. DATED : JUNE 21, 2010 We have heard learned Counsel for the appellants. By this letters patent appeal, the appellants have impugned the order dated 20.11.2009 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by them. We have perused the orders impugned by the appellants. It is clear from the order of the learned Single Judge that all the submissions 2 advanced on behalf of the appellants, including the only submissions advanced before us in respect of purchase of the stamp papers for scribing the bonds, were considered in a proper perspective and in our view, the writ petition was rightly dismissed for the reasons recorded in the order. We find from the impugned order that the learned Single Judge had gone through the entire original record produced before him and after having recorded his satisfaction and for the reasons recorded by the Authorities below, dismissed the petition. This appeal also raises disputed questions of facts, which are set at rest by the learned Single Judge so also by the lower Authorities. In the circumstances, we find no merit in the appeal. It is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE khj