IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.971 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.05.2011 Jugal Kishore Kataria . . .Petitioner Versus Ramesh Walia . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Harkesh Manuja, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Anil Kshetarpal, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) CM No.11499-CII-2011 Application is allowed as prayed for. CR No.971 of 2011 (O&M) This revision petition is directed against order dated 7.1.2011 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Chandigarh by which tenant has been granted leave to defend the petition filed by the landlord under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent and Restriction Act, 1949 (for short ‘the Act’). After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for withdrawal of the revision petition with further prayer that the Rent Controller may be directed to decide the eviction petition within a particular time frame to which no objection has been raised by learned counsel for the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the case is now at the stage of evidence of the petitioner. He undertakes to complete his evidence on two effective opportunities of hearing thereafter learned counsel for the respondents submits that he would require three effective opportunities to complete his evidence. Keeping in view the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the learned Rent Controller, Chandigarh is directed to decide the rent petition as early as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Revision petition is disposed of accordingly. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MAY 02, 2011 JUDGE vivek