1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C.A. No.3868 of 2004 in MCA (Review) St. No.7465 of 2004 in W.P. No.2681of 1999 (Decided) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- CORAM : D.D.Sinha, J. DATE : January 19, 2007. Heard Mr.Marpakwar, Counsel for the Applicant. Misc. Civil Application No. 3868 of 2004 is for condonation of delay in filing the Misc. Civil Application for review. Counsel for the applicant states that, after dismissal of the Writ Petition on 21.3.2001, the petitioner had approached the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal by filing Original Application No.553 of 2003 which was withdrawn by the applicant on 8.12.2003 and therefore, whatever delay which is caused in filing the review application may kindly be condoned. In the instant case, the applicant was represented by the lawyer in the Writ Petition which was dismissed by this Court on 21.3.2001. The petitioner approached the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal in the year 2003. There is no reason whatsoever mentioned in the Civil Application as to why the 2 petitioner did not file review application after dismissal of the Writ Petition within a reasonable time. Even Otherwise, the petitioner approached the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal after lapse of couple of years from the date of dismissal of the Writ Petition and it is only after the Original Application filed before the Tribunal was withdrawn, the present review application came to be filed. In the circumstances, the reasons mentioned in the Civil Application for condonation of delay, in my view, are inadequate to condone the same. Hence, the Civil Application No. 3868 of 2004 is hereby dismissed. Consequently, the review application is also dismissed. JUDGE ssj