HK3H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASMR WritPeWon <s) No. 6411of2(X)6 Pefitioner Vereus Reqwnctents 1. Darbari Ram ESinrar, S/o Shri Derharam, Agsd about 60 yeare, R/o Wllage & Post l^uita", Poltee StaUon - Kharora, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.). State of Chhatfi^arti, Through: SeCTietaty, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ratpur (C.G.). Sub Divisional CWicer. Water Management Sub Diw'sion No. 5, Kanki, P.8. Kharora, Distt-Raipur(C.G.) SB: Hon'ble Mr. JusUce Satish K. Agnihofrj, J Shri Virendra Sharma, Advocate forth®peWoner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt. At^ocate for the r^pondents. ORDER (Passed on this 14"1 day <rf March, 2007) By ths pefflion, the pefiBoner, who has worked fbr more than 23 years as (tengman seete a relief that the p^ttoner being permanent gangman be retired at the age oS 62 years in accordance vntti the ChhatUsgarti ShiBkiya Se^rak (MhhrarehBd-Ayu) Adhini^m, 1967 ( for short Ihe Act, 1967') read wth Fundamental Rute (for short 'F.R.') 56. The indisputaUe facls are that Ihe petitioner was empk^ed as gans^nan in the year 1^3 and he was retired from ^nnce w.e.f. 11.10.2006 on attalnlng the age of 80 years senrice vfcte order dated 3.102006. According to learned counsel for ttie pelitioner, Bie petittoner attained the status of (»rmanent employee, as defined undsr Rute 2(c) of the ChhatBsgarh (Woriecharged and ConBngency Paid Employees) Pension Rutes, 1979 ( for short the Rutes, 1979'), framed uncter ArBcle 309 of the Consfitutfon <rf Incte. After having attained the status of the pennanent emptoyee the pefitioner would refire on attaining the age of B2 years on superannuaUon under the provlaons of the Act, 1967. -—~ Leamed counsel appearing <br e pe oner vwuU submtt that the case of tha petifionsr is squarely covared by ttie decision of this Couitpawad on 41tl January, 2007 in W.P. No. 108QO(S (Govind Vs. State of Chhatti^arh & others) and other connwted matters. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State ctoes rot <fispute ttre submissfons macte by teamed counsel for the peUioner. /tecordingly, ttie petifioner, who is pennanent gangnran, is enfitted to retire on atteining (he age <rf 62 years in accoidance wilh the Act, 1^7. The petttion is accordingly dteposed of. No order as to costs. Consequently, M(W)P No. 4701/2a»stanclsdisposed of. Thakw Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge