1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2745 OF 2005 Mahesh Sahakari Bank Ltd.,. .. Petitioner. vs. Madan Tilakram Agarwal & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr. G.D. Utangale i/by M/s. Utangale & Co. for petitioner. Mr. P.S. Dani for respondent no.2. CORAM : S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 18th November, 2005. P.C.: . The present petition challenges two orders one granting condonation of delay in filing the revision application before the revisional authority and another granting interim stay in execution of the proceedings. In my opinion, both are interlocutory orders and ought not to be interfered with in the writ jurisdiction under Article 227. If the authority on facts found that the delay should be condoned then this Court in a writ jurisdiction cannot interfere with such judicious discretion 2 exercised by the Divisional Joint Registrar. Stay is granted of further execution in view of the pending revision application and in that view of the matter, the stay order also does not call for any interference. Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.