1 BA 1439 OF 2011 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1439 OF 2011 Dnyaneshwar Balu Patole .. Applicant. -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.520 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1439 OF 2011 Dnyaneshwar Balu Patole .. Applicant. -versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent. AND Mr. Sukhdeo Dangat .. Interventor Mr.V. V. Purwant, for the applicant. Mrs. M. R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent State. Mr. S. A. Sawant, with Ms. Gunjan Shah, for the Intervenor. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 29th September, 2011 P.C. 1. This is an application by one Dnyaneshwar Patole, who claims to be released on bail on the ground of parity since the co-accused Yellappa Pundappa Ahiwale has been admitted to bail by this Court, by order dated 23rd February, 2010 in Criminal Application No.362 of 2010. Said Yellapa was 2 BA 1439 OF 2011 not named as assailant in the F.I.R. It is applicant’s case that he was also not named in F.I.R. and his name came to be disclosed alongwith Yellappa in supplementary statement of the first informant and in the statements of four witnesses namely Ankush Pawar, Siddheshwar Shelke, Samir Taras and Sandip Jadhav. Therefore, on the ground of parity, the applicant claims bail. 2. The name of Dnyaneshwar Patole undoubtedly is not mentioned in the F.I.R. However, F.I.R. mentions the name of one Farid Shaikh as assailant. The first informant, in the supplementary statement informs that he learnt that Dnyaneshwar Patole is the same person whom he named as Farid Shaikh in the F.I.R. It cannot be said that the applicant had not been named in the F.I.R. Since the F.I.R.l is not an encyclopedia, investigation may reveal something more than what is mentioned in the F.I.R. There is no question of parity since there are other four witnesses who claimed to have seen the applicant at the spot. Applicant is not entitled to bail. 3. In view of this both the Criminal Application No.1439 of 2011 for bail is rejected and Criminal Application No.520 of 2011 filed by intervenor-original complainant does not survive and the same is disposed of. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.) 3 BA 1439 OF 2011