IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 442 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 29 OF 2000 MRS. PIEDADE RODRIGUES AND 12 ....Applicants ORS., Versus VILLAGE PANCHAYAT OF USGAO-GANJEM ....Respondents AND 2 ORS., Mr. Arun Bras De Sa, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. M. D'Souza, Advocate for Respondents. Coram:- P.V. KAKADE, J. Date:- 6th November, 2006 P.C.: Heard both the parties. This is an application for correction of typographical mistake in an order passed on 10/3/2006 in Second Appeal No. 29 of 2000. In para 4 of the body of the order, the impugned property is stated to be wrongly described as Survey No. 21/1. However, perusal of the record shows that it should be 22/1 and not 21/1. On perusal of the entire record I am satisfied that it is nothing but an typographical mistake and, therefore, needs correction. Hence, the application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and stands disposed of. The only correction is to be made in the last line of para 4 of the order annexed to the application. P.V. KAKADE, J. NH