1 cp309.sxw ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.309 OF 2010 Dinesh Laxman Surwase ...Petitioner vs. Sampat Bhausaheb Patil & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.G.M.Savagave for the petitioner Mr.B.A.LAwate for the respondent nos.1 and 2 Mr.A.I.Patel, A.G.P for respondent nos.3 and 4 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE :DECEMBER 23,2010 P.C. 1 The learned counsel for the 1st and 2nd respondents states that the petitioner will be permitted to sign the muster from tomorrow i.e 24th December 2010. The statement is accepted. 2 There is an affidavit filed by Mr.Ambedkar, Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Solapur. In paragraph 2 of the affidavit it is stated thus : 2...Accordingly, this respondent has granted approval to the post of the petitioner on non grant in aid basis on 11-11-2009. I say that the School of the Respondent, Management is came on the grant in aid basis since, July 2004 on 40% and from 2007 on 100%. However, due to several litigations filed by the teachers, the Respondent Management has not withdrawn the grant in aid. The proposal of the petitioner for granting approval on grant in aid is received on 11.11.2009 and the approval is 2 cp309.sxw granted on 11.11.2009. I say that in regard to the outstanding dues of Rs.9,13,921/- towards the salary of the petitioner, this Respondent has directed the Superintendent, Pay Unit to release and pay to the petitioner. 3 In view of the aforesaid statement of the learned counsel for the 1st and 2nd respondents and in view of the aforesaid statement of the Education Officer in the affidavit, there appears to be a substantial compliance with the order in question. The State Government will ensure that the salary of the petitioner is released as expeditiously as possible. 4 Subject to what is observed above, no case is made out to proceed further. Petition is disposed of. JUDGE