IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.2026 & 2027 of 2011 Between: Reddy Kanna Devi and another ..... PETITIONERS AND Yasarla Satyavathi .....RESPONDENT The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.2026 & 2027 of 2011 COMMON ORDER: The petitioners are the defendants in the suit O.S.445/2008 on the file of the II Addl.Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, filed by the respondent/plain tiff for recovery of money basing on promissory note. After the evidence is over, the defendants filed two applications for reopening the suit and for sending Ex.A1 promissory note to an expert for scientific examination. If the petitioners dispute the signatures on Ex.A1, unless they are in possession of any document containing their signatures as admitted by the plaintiff, they cannot be compared by an expert. Therefore, in the absence of any material available for comparing the signatures of the defendants in Ex.A1 from that of the admitted signatures, the promissory note cannot be sent for an expert opinion. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. However, if the defendants are in possession of any documents of the contemporary period, containing their signatures, as admitted by the plaintiff, it is open for the petitioners to file an appropriate application before the Court below. No order as to costs. ________________ V.ESWARAIAH,J Dated: 10.06.2011 Dsr