IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 24614 of 2005 Between: K.M.R.Achary, S/o.K.Munaswamy, R/o.Alwal, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt of A.P. Rep by Principal Secretary to Govt., Higher Education department, Hyderabad. 2 The Director of Collegiate Education, Govt of A.P., Hyderabad. 3 The Correspondent, Loyola Academy Degree College, Old Alwal, Secunderabad. 4 Fr.Francis Xavier, S.J., Loyola Academy Degree College, Old Alwal, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue Writ, order or direction particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and declare the G.O.Rt.No.894, higher education (CE.II.2) department dt.2/11/2005 as illegal, arbitrary, and in violation of principles of natural justice and pass such further or other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.BHASKARA CHARY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : ORDER: When the writ petition came up for hearing on 24.06.2009, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even on this day also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ______________________ B. SESHASAYANA REDDY,J 6th July, 2009. CBS HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY Writ Petition No.24614 of 2005 (Dismissed for N.P. -NC) 6th July, 2009 CBS When the writ petition came up for hearing on 24.06.2009, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and therefore, it was directed to be listed on under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite the matter being listed on this day under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.