HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS J;! s ^ WRITPETlTroNW) No. 3649 flf2007 - : 1. Ramadhar Verma Age about 47 year, Astt. Teaeher S/o Shri Bhawani Prasad Verma Pnmaiy School Janglor Bloek - Palari, Distt. - Raipur(C.G.) . 2. Sant Kumar Tandan Age about 40 year, Astt. Teacher S/o Shri Hira Das Tandan Primary School Harin Bhatta Block - Palari, Distt - Raipur(C.G.) VEI^US , : , : 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Tribal .Wslfare Department & Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Edueation QflGcer Raipur Distt. Raipiir :(C.O.) . . , ',. ' ! : , • 3. Block Education OfBcer Palari Distt. Raipw ^. (C.G.) - \ ; 4. Joint Director Treasury, Accounts & Pension Raipui- Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTUTIQN OF INDIA. SinsEleBench: Hon'ble Justlce ShriSatish K Aenlhotri. Present: ShriSomkaut Verma.Advocate forthe petitioners. Slni Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advoeate for the State/respondeats. ORDER (Passed on 28°'day of Juae, 2007) 1. The question of law mvolved hereia is asto whether fhe petitioners are entitledto regular pay scale w.e.fthe date ofinitial appomtmeiit or fi'om the date ofcompletion ofprobation period. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitionere as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are fhe same as to fhat ofin W.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushfl Tiwari and others Vs. State Govenunent of CMiattisgarh & Othera), whichwas allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. 3. In-view ofthe above-stated sybmissions made byleamed counsel forthe parties, the writ petition is allowed in fhe same terms, subjeet to verification ofthe facts. No order as to costs. SatishK.Agnihom % Judge Assot -N ^•^^lATfc^i