HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5999 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner filed an appeal under Section 5(5) of the A.P. Record of Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act (for short ‘the Act’) before the 1st respondent herein against the entries made in the pahanies for the year 2006-07 in respect of the land in Survey No.7 of Satamrai Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. At a later stage, he filed a petition seeking permission of the 1st respondent to withdraw the appeal. Through an order, dated 26.02.2009, the 1st respondent recorded certain findings and after making mention to the petition filed by the petitioner, he directed that the appeal is “withdrawn as not pressed”. The petitioner feels aggrieved by the observation made by the 1st respondent in the order, particularly the findings mentioned therein. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. It is no doubt true that the petitioner initially approached the 1st respondent by way of appeal. However, he has filed a revision under Section 9 of the Act before the Joint Collector and simultaneously filed a petition seeking withdrawal of the appeal. The 1st respondent dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. However, he has proceeded to record certain findings and directed withdrawal of the appeal obviously on account of lack of experience in this regard. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that the impugned order shall be treated as the one permitting the petitioner to withdraw the appeal and nothing more. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 23.03.2009 JSU HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5999 of 2009 Date: 23.03.2009 JSU