IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33992 of 2008 1.RUPESH KUMAR RAJ @ RUPESH KUMAR ROY SON OF NAGESHWAR YADAV @ NAGESHWAR PRSAD YADAV. RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NARKI,POLICE STATION RANIGANJ,DISTRICT ARARIA 2.RANJEET KUMAR @ RANJEET KUMAR GUPTA SON OF RAJ KUMAR GUPTA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE FAUSI COLONY (KODHOLI),POLICE STATION FORBESGANJ,DISTRICT ARARIA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 17.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The present case has been registered for offences under Sections 366, and 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code against these two petitioners in which it has been alleged that these petitioners might have taken the informant’s daughter who was found missing from the house. Submission is that the case was registered on account of confusion. The victim girl and her father were present in the court of Sessions Judge and have admitted the fact that the case has been compromised and the victim has stated that she had gone to the house of her mother’s sister without prior information to her parent and there was joint submission that the case was lodged on account of some confusion. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named two petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in Forbesganj P.S.Case No. 470 of 2007. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)