1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO.411/2011 The Superintending Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, Bhandara, Tq. and Distt. Bhandara ...Versus... Chakradhar s/o Baliram Shende and another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. [Shri R.E. Moharir, Adv. for appellant] CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 06.05.2011. Heard. Admit on the following substantial questions of law. (1) Whether the finding recorded by the Commissioner under Workmen's Compensation that there was 45% disability, is perverse and unjustified ? (2) Whether the award of compensation based on the finding that respondent No.1 sustained 45% disability is consequently illegal and incorrect and not based on evidence ? (3) Whether respondent No.1 was in employment of appellant and whether the accident took place during the course of employment ? Put up with First Appeal No.332/2011. 2 CIVIL APPLICATION F. NO.1260/2011 Learned Counsel for the appellant states that the entire amount under award with costs and interest has been deposited before the Commissioner. Hence ad interim stay in terms of prayer clause  (i). JUDGE ssw