IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.1734 of 2011 Date of Decision: March 01, 2011 Satbir Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Saini, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent Nos.1 to 4. None for respondent Nos.5 to 7. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Respondent Nos.5 to 7 have been served dasti. 2. On 31.1.2011, the following order was passed, which would explain the nature of issue involved in the petition:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that although orders have been passed under Section 7 of the Village Common Lands Act and warrants of possession were also issued, yet no action has been taken by the official machinery viz. respondents no.1 to 4. Notice of motion for 01.03.2011. Deputy Commissioner, Mahendergarh at Narnaul is CWP No.1734 of 2011 [2] directed to file his affidavit as to under what circumstances orders passed by the authority Annexure P-1 have not been implemented. Official respondents have been served in Court through Mr. S.S. Nara, Sr. DAG, Haryana and requisite number of copies of the writ petition have been handed over to him. Respondents no.5 to 7 be served by ay of dasti process.” 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has placed on record a document termed as Annexure R-1/T dated 25.2.2011. The document discloses that on the given date, Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Mahendergarh, went to the spot to deliver possession of land to Gram Panchayat, Mundia Khera. Illegal possession was got removed with the help of JCB machine and labourers, and possession handed over to Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat. 4. Learned counsel further contends that action is to be taken against the erring official(s). 5. In view of the stand of respondent-State as disclosed from the document (Annexure R-1/T), cause of action does not survive. 6. The petition is disposed of accordingly. (AJAI LAMBA) March 01, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?