IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 526 of 1989 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- NIRANJAN A PANDYA Versus DISTRICT PANCHAYAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PV HATHI for Petitioner MR PM RAVAL for Respondent No. 1 MS DARSHANA PANDIT, ASSTT.GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent No. 3, 4 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI Date of decision: 22/09/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT When this petition is called out for final hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner points out that the petitioner has expired on 24th August, 1993. In this view of the matter, the petition has abated. Rule is therefore discharged with no order as to costs. Ad-interim relief stands vacated. This will be without prejudice to any rights of the heirs to get dues if any, in accordance with law. --- */Mohandas