@ @ Smgla Berra?! IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. gSl 11(50 b /2011 (’ Genram S/o Ramsharan aged about 32 years, Cast Baiga, Working as Shiksha Karmi Grade — 3 Primary School Kanya Prasi R/o Village Podi Tah. Sipat Dist. Bilaspur C.G. PETITIONER VERSUSE RESPONDENTS l. State of Chhatishgarh through :- The Secretary Department ofPanchayat & Rural Development , Mantralay, D.K.S. , Bhawan , Raipur C.G. 2. [The Cast Scrutiny Committee , Pandit Ravishankar Vishvavidyalaya Parisar Raipur , Distt. Raipur C.G. 3. The ChiefExecutive Officer , Janpad Panchayat Marwahi , Distt. Bilaspur C.G. WRIT PETITION UNDER SECTION 226 OF THE M CONSTITUTION OF INDIA w Shri Amit Kumar, couns i for the petitioner. Shri A.\I. Shridhar, Pan i Lawyer for the State‘ The grievance of the‘ etitioner as stated in the petition is that the respondent authorities are re uiring the petitioner to produce reievant caste certificate duiy verified by th High Levei Caste Scrutiny Committee but so far enquiry before the Com ittee is not complete and the matter is still pending. He further submits hat the Committee has required the petitioner to submit various documents and whatever information and documents are in possession of the petition r, have aiready been submitted. He further submits that for one reason r the other, the matter is still pending before the Committee without hnal d cision and the petitioner is apprehending that the department may take dis plinary action against him or may terminate for want of duly verified caste ce ificate. The learned State co nsel submitted that as the matter of caste scrutiny of the petitioner is p nding before the Committee, the same will be decided according to law a d the petitioner be directed to furnish all the documents including those documents which are demanded by the Committee from the petitione . From the pleadings an documents which are recorded, it is apparent that the enquiry with regard o the caste status of the petitioner is pending before the State Level Caste crutiny Committee and certain documents are i mmWW w/Dé)w> 4...%;L 200 m tram (Warn mmm ‘ am m?!m m“ 1m “a“ Wgqgéaiggg‘ . r .- . WT?“ ” SB : Hon’bie Shri Manindra M han Shrivastava. J. 11-08-2011 T. “W xx-HC~78 3a WM, @Wn—c; m @ “WTm.............¢C.>..wa....%z ....... é 1200 mm (WKH) mam i ammm r _ Wmmém §_Q_ Wahwm mrr'ft' 11' Fglé‘t tFagR demanded from the petitione and the petitioner submits that whatever documents are avaiiabie, have been submitted. i ~ wBe‘ that as it may, the committee is required to decide the matter » withinare‘asdnable timer Th petitioner shaii place before the Committee “ail ‘the"infotmation and docu ents which are in his possession within a periodof month from today. The department shall not take any coercive steps against the petitioner o account of non-submission of verified caste Scrutiny certificate for further p riod of six months. With the aforesaid directons, the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Deepti Judge