HIGH COURT GE CFMATTISGARH g BILASPUR §ETiTlOI§1ES 1 . Vandematram Higher Secondary Schad, Thakurdia, Kharsiya, District Raipur (CG). Through ifs Managing Committee President, Gridhari GabeL S/o Laxmi Pra$ad Gabek, aged about 45 years. R/o Thakurdia, Kharsiya, Distrist Raipur (QG). Ami? Paiei, SI’o RN. Pafei. aged about 19 years, Rio Mohua Pali, Housing Board Coieny, Kharsiya. District Raipur (CG), Versus RESPGNDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary‘ Department of School Education, D.K.$. Building. Mantiaiaya. Raipur (CG). 2. Chhaitisgarh Board of Secondary Education, Raipur (CG), through the Secretary. 3. Divieionai Cfhoer, Chhattisgarh Board of Secondary Education, Biiaspur (CG). Sushri Uéha Chouhan, Board Member, Chhaftisgarh Board of Secondary Educaiion, Raipur (CG). (Wrii oetition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Single Eench : Hon’ble shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present := Mr. Shashank Thakur, counseiforthe petiiioner. Mr. Aiok Bakshi. Govt. Advocate for the S€ate. Wir. RS. Patel. Aovocate for the respondents No.2 & 3. (Passed on thie 4h: February. 2&09) With ihe coneent of iearned c'ouneei aopearing for the ponies, the petition is heard tinaiiy. ‘ 2) ‘ihe petitioners seek a writiorder to quash the impugned notice dated 21-7-2008 (Annexure-Pii) whereby the Secretary. Chhattisgarh Board of Secondary Eoucation, Raipur, canceiied the results of 3? students of ciass Xil. 3) Learned caunsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the Highef Secondary Sthool Certificate Examination was held from 2§—2-2008. Petitiener No.1 was the examination centre for the students of ciass Xtl. The results of class Xtl were dectared in the tast week of May, 2008, but the resuits of the students who have appeared in the examination centre of petitioner No.1 school were withheld by the impugned notice date 21-7-2068. lt was held that pursuant to the decision of the Examination and the Results Committee. held on 25-$-2008. mass copying was reported and found. therefore. the results were withheld. 4) Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present petition are similar to that of in W.P.(C) No.5353 of 2008 (Umashankar & Others vs. The Chairman, éfwhaffisgarh Madhyamik Shfksha Mandel, Ralpur & Gthers). decided by this Court on 5-12-2008. 5) Thus, this petition is also dismissed in View of the order passed in Umashankar (supra). However. in the facts and circumstances of the case. it is desirable that the respondent Board shall conduct reexamination. as early as possible to save the time of the students. No order asto costs. Sd/- \{Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge Gowri