IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R 1. S.B. Civil Review Petition No.41 of 2008. IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5342 of 2006. Shri Mahaveer Digambar Jain Senior Secondary School, Jaipur VERSUS The State of Rajasthan and others 2. S.B. Civil Review Petition No.42 of 2008. IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5346 of 2006. Shri Mahaveer Digambar Jain Senior Secondary School, Jaipur VERSUS The State of Rajasthan and others 3. S.B. Civil Review Petition No.43 of 2008. IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5341 of 2006. Shri Mahaveer Digambar Jain Senior Secondary School, Jaipur VERSUS The State of Rajasthan and others 4. S.B. Civil Review Petition No.44 of 2008. IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5343 of 2006. Shri Mahaveer Digambar Jain Senior Secondary School, Jaipur VERSUS The State of Rajasthan and others 5. S.B. Civil Review Petition No.47 of 2008. IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9329 of 2006. Shri Mahaveer Digambar Jain Senior Secondary School, Jaipur VERSUS The State of Rajasthan and others Date of Order ::: 11/07/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.S. Asopa Mr. Virendra Lodha, Counsel for the Petitioner Dr. A.S. Khangarot and Mr. Shyam Sharma, Counsel for the Respondents **** Heard learned counsel for the parties. This Court passed the following order while allowing the connected writ petitions :- The concerned department may accordingly carry out the exercise of finding out the exact amount payable to each of the petitioner institution towards grant-in-aid as per rules and regulations in this regard and whatever amount is required to be paid as per such calculation, the same may be paid to the concerned institution at the earliest. The concerned department may complete this exercise within three months from the date of receipt of this order, after going through the related record and after due verification of the same and if any information is called for from any of the petitioner institution, it may provide such information immediately and thereafter, the required amount may be reimbursed without further delay. All these writ petitions are accordingly allowed in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs. The counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of issuance of the general directions certain specific administrative allowances are not being paid. The counsel for the respondents submits that on account of denial of the specific amount the petitioner will have fresh cause of action for which he can file fresh writ petition. I have considered the aforesaid aspect of the matter and in my view in issuing general directions this Court has not committed any error apparent on the face of the record, which deserves to be reviewed. However, considering the fact that the general directions will include specific denial also, therefore, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the respondents and in case the same is filed within one-month from today then the State Government will pass appropriate orders within another one-month. The review petitions are accordingly disposed of. (P.S. Asopa) J. ashok/