IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA: CWP.No.515/2004 Date of Decision :30.3.2007. Kanwarjit Singh …Petitioner. Versus: C.S.K.H.P.K.V.University. …Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr.Anup Rattan, Advocate. For Respondent. Mr.Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate Sanjay Karol, J (Oral). It is the case of the petitioner that since 1977, petitioner was engaged and performing the duties of Senior Museum Specialist in the category of Teacher with the respondent-University. He has placed on record various documents to show that the University has been treating him as Teacher and passing various orders in his favour. Petitioner, however, is aggrieved of the order dated 11th June, 2004 whereby the petitioner’s appeal/request for continuation of petitioner’s name in the Electoral Roll for Election to the Junior Teacher Constituency has been rejected. From the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 perusal of the order, it is clear that no reasons whatsoever have been assigned while considering and rejecting the petitioner’s request. Without going into the merits/controversy respectively raised by the learned counsels, the respondent is directed to furnish the reasons of rejection of his representation within a period of two weeks from today. It will be open for the petitioner to take all such measures as he may be advised. Other questions raised in the present petition remain undecided. It will also open for the parties to take all such pleas and contentions as may be available to them, in the event of the petitioner initiating any further proceedings before an appropriate forum. The present writ petition is disposed of accordingly. CMP.No.1016/2004 Infructuous. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. March 30, 2007(R)