IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 9TH APRIL 2010 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 9506 of 2010(K) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- M/S.DAWN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES (PVT)LTD., VELLOORKKARA, PUTHENCRUIZ P.O., KOCHI-682308, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, DR.JOHNSON C.LUCKOSE. BY ADV.MR.M.A.FAYAZ RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM. 3. ASSISTANT ENGINEER (KSEB) ELECTRICAL SECTION, PUTHENCRUIZ. ADV. MR.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B FOR R1-3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.9506 of 2010 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th APRIL, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this Court challenging Ext.P3 bill, raising many a ground. Learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents submits that, it is only a 'provisional bill' and that the petitioner has filed Ext.P5 statement of objection as well. It is also stated that 'final bill' will be issued only after considering the objections filed by the petitioner and no coercive proceedings will be taken in the meanwhile. In the above circumstances, no further orders are necessary in this regard. 2. With regard to the 'fourth prayer' of the petitioner, for providing permanent electricity connection, the learned standing counsel submits that all necessary steps are being finalised within the shortest possible time and that the position has already been conveyed to the petitioner as per communication dated 30/12/2009. 3. Proceedings as above shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, subject to the satisfaction of the W.P.(c)No.9506/10 : 2 : statutory requirements by the petitioner. The respondent Board shall communicate the petitioner as to requirements, if any, to be satisfied by the petitioner in this regard forthwith. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly, recording the submissions made from the part of the respondents as above. (P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE) acd