IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.56921 OF 2007 RAHMATULLAH ANSARI, SON OF LATE ASRAF ALI, UMMATUL VILLA IMAMBARA GALI, MOHARRAMPUR, BAKARGANJ, POLICE STATION PIRBAHORE, DISTRICT PATNA VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MD. ZAKIUDDIN, SON OF MD. SALAHUDDIN OF MOHALLA SAMANPURA, POLICE STATION SHASTRI NAGAR, DISTRICT PATNA. AT PRESENT C/0 DR. MD. IMTAYAZUDDIN AZAD AZIMABAD COLONY, DARGHA ROAD AT & POLICE STATION SULTANGANJ, POST OFFICE MAHENDRU, DISTRICT PATNA 3. DR. MD. IMTEYAZUDDIN AZAD OF AZIMABAD COLONY, DARGHA ROAD AT & POLICE STTION SULTANGANJ, POST OFFICE MAHENDRU, DISTRICT PATNA …………………………………………………………………………OPPOSITE PARTIES ******** 2 05/04/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed challenging the order dated 18.05.2006 passed in Case No. 539 (C) of 2006 (T.R. No. 2647 of 2006) by which the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna has dismissed the complaint under Section 203 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also the order dated 21.09.2007 passed in Criminal Revision No. 642 of 2006/31 of 2006 by which the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 2, Patna has affirmed the order dated 18.05.2006. The complainant claims that he entered into an agreement in the year 1993 to purchase a plot of land. In the year 2005, he came to know that the land in question has been sold to a third party. In between the 2 interim period, he had approached the accused persons on several occasions, however, the accused persons did not deliver the possession of the land in question. The Courts below has rightly found that infact the complainant has not been able to satisfy the Court with respect to the allegations made in the complaint petition and found that the only remedy for the complainant is to file a civil suit. I find no illegality in the reasonings given by the Subordinate Courts. In the result, this application is dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)