IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2010 / 18TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 12542 of 2010(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- THULASEEDHARAN NAIR, S/O.M.NANU NAIR, AGED 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT ASWATHY BHAVANAM, AKKEL, PANMANA, EDAPPALLIKOTTA P.O, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.AYYAPPAN SANKAR SRI.G.SURARSHAN RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. SECRETARY, MYNAGAPPALLY GRAMA PANCHAYAT MYNAGAPPALLY P.O, KOLLAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.V.MANU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 12542 OF 2010 (P) ===================== Dated this the 8th day of April, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submitted Ext.P1 application for a building permit. That request was rejected by the Panchayat by Ext.P3(b), where it was stated that the adjacent road is one notified under Section 220(b) of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act. Thereupon, petitioner obtained the resolution passed by the Panchayat in this behalf, which is Ext.P7 dated 15/3/1997. It is challenging Ext.P7 and P3 (b), the writ petition is filed. 2. Therefore, the primary grievance of the petitioner is against Ext.P7 resolution passed by the Panchayat. If so, the remedy of the petitioner is under Section 191 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing that it will be open to the petitioner to pursue his grievance against Ext.P7 in appropriate proceedings. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp