HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. [8] [£03221 of 2008 PETYI‘IONER Smt. Sulonhana Nefam, Wlo Lam Shri D.B. Netam, Age about 41 years, Superviser, I.C.D.S. Ofiioe, Durgukoilda], Distt. ‘ Kanker (C.G.) Versus l State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Thmugh : Secretary Woman 6r. Child Development and Social Welfare Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Distt. Pmgmmme 0$csr Woman & Child Dcvelopnxent Deparmlent DistL - Kanker (C.G.) Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Appearance: Shri Somkant Vanna, counsel for the patjtioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State] respondents ORAL onmm Q , (17.04.20081 SUNIL KUMAR SlNgé, J. Heani. The petitioner was tmnsferred fmm Disuiot Kanker to District Bastar on her own expensas by order dated 29.6.2007 (Annexure-P/ 1). Learnezd counsel for the peti1ioner submits that though the order of h'ansfer was issued on 29.6.2007 but the petitioner has not been relieved an far. He also submits that in this mgald a napmsentation baa been med by the petitioner, a copy ofwhich has been tiled as Annexure-P/S. For the time being, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a limited prayer that a direction may be issued to the V\/‘concemed authority of the reepondente to dispose of the " nepresentation tiled by the petitioner, which would serve the ends ofjustice. This limited prayer made hy learned counsel for the \ \ petitioner iS not opposed by learned counsel for the State. it ‘E‘ \ e The same is allowed. Looking to the. fact that the pefifirmer has hmn mnsferred on 29.6.2007, it is dimmed that the repmsentation mad by the petitioner for mlieving her shall he dispooed of by the concerned authority at the earliest. With the afmesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/— Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge <, vam‘ ‘jFVj’’gr. W.P. (S) No.2221 of 2008