IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 25TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 3RD ASWINA 1929 RP.No. 441 of 2005(S) -------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.35955/2000 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2: --------------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR, DOORDARSHAN KENDRA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, DOORDARSHAN KENDRA, NEW DELHI. BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) SRI.S.SUJIN RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER & 3RD RESPONDENT IN THE O.P: ------------------- 1. P.G. BAIJU, CASUAL MAKE UP ASSISTANT, DOORDARSHAN KENDRA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INFORMATION & BROADCASTING, SASTRIBHAVAN,NEW DELHI BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASGI SRI.G.SASIDHARAN CHEMPAZHANTHIYIL SRI.VISHNU.S. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: tss J.B.KOSHY & K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JJ. -------------------------------------- R.P.No.441 of 2005 in O.P.No.35955 OF 2000 ------------------------------------- Dated 25th September, 2007 ORDER Koshy,J . This review petition is filed for reviewing the judgment passed in O.P.No.35955 of 2000 dated 16th May, 2005. The operative portion of the judgment is for consideration of the writ petitioner's claim for regularization within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. It is pointed out that the Department has already passed an order regarding regularization and that is not challenged. In the above circumstances, there is no merit in the review petition. The review petition is dismissed. J.B.KOSHY JUDGE K.P.BALACHANDRAN JUDGE tks