IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 36 OF 2010 MRS. SANDHYA SONI ... Appellant Versus MRS. KITTU UMBERKOMAN AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. P. A. Kamat,Advocate for the appellant. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 4th October, 2010 P.C. Mr. Kamat, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant states that during the pendency of the appeal, respondent No.1 has already transferred her interest in the suit property in favour of respondent Nos. 3 and 4. 2. The appeal was filed challenging the order passed by the Trial Court refusing to grant order against respondent no.1 from creating third party rights in respect of the suit property. 3. In view of the above, Mr. Kamat seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file an appropriate application before the Trial Court. 4. In view of the subsequent events, the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. Needless to mention that the appellant is at liberty to avail of appropriate remedy as may be available in law. The appeal stands disposed of accordingly. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA