-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1121 OF 2006 Sanjay Madhukar Satam ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents Mr. Arfan Sait for the applicant. Smt. M.M. Deshmukh, APP, for the State. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & R.G. KETKAR, JJ. DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 2010. P.C. The prayer in this application is for amendment of the appeal memo. The court is informed that the appeal memo is already amended and the amended memo of appeal is already placed on record. In view of this, nothing further survives in this application. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in the application, the applicant has not prayed for bail. The said prayer has been made in the appeal memo. He, therefore, seeks liberty to apply for separate application for bail. In our view, it is not necessary to take our permission in this behalf. We may clarify that it is always open to the applicant to apply afresh for bail in accordance with law by filing an appropriate application. His prayer for moving bail application on behalf of the -2- applicant in accordance with law is granted. This application is accordingly disposed of. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. R.G. KETKAR, J.