IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8397 of 2011 Anuradha Verma W/o- Vijay Kumar Sinha R/o- Chanakya Colony, P.S.- Hajipur Town (Industrial), Dist- Vaishali. ...... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar With Cr.Misc. No.10516 of 2011 1. Ashu @ Anudeep Vijay 2. Nishu @ Anuroop Vijay Both are S/o- Vijay Kumar Sinha R/o- Chanakya Colony, P.S.- Hajipur Town (Industrial), Dist- Vaishali. ...... Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ----------- 5 09.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Both these applications arising out of one case are taken up together and being heard and disposed of by this composite order. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 337 of 2003 for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in this case petitioners are not only mother and sons, but also named in this case realizing to opening of a private company and persuading different persons to invest substantial amount with 2 the interest at high rate. Submission is that two male petitioners are student of B.Tech at Banglore and is mother is a house lady and nothing to do with the said business nor there any specific allegation against them. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 337 of 2003, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to Anuradha Verma (petitioner in Cr. Misc No. 8397 of 2011) to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years of till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Bhardwaj (Akhilesh Chandra, J)