1 S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.5087/2006 Date : 14.11.2006 HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. M.K. Garg for the applicant. Mr. V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned counsel appearing for Union of India and carefully gone through the impugned order. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the bail bonds of the applicant were forfeited and he is in jail since last two months. He submits that in the interest of justice, he may be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, learned counsel for Union of India has opposed the bail application. I have considered the submissions made before me. 2 Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that applicant Raju Ram S/o Rama Nand shall be released on bail in Sessions Case No.48/2006 (State Vs. Kesaram and ors.), provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J. vij