sanjay 1 31402.10-rpw(st) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 31402 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 539 OF 2005 City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd., Navi Mumbai. ... Applicant. V/s. M/s.Makhija Developers Pvt.Ltd. and others. ... Respondents. G.S.Hegde for the applicant. Avinash Fatangare for respondent No.1. S.D.Rayrikar, A.G.P. for respondent No.2. Ms.Deepti Mestry i/b. M/s.Divyakant Mehta & Associates for respondent No.4. CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE & R.Y.Ganoo, JJ. DATED : 4th May 2011. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is a review petition praying for expunging the alleged adverse remarks and observations made by us in our judgment dated 20th sanjay 2 31402.10-rpw(st) January 2010 passed in Writ Petition No.539/2005. The review petition is filed pursuant to the order passed by the Supreme Court on 7th July 2010 in S.L.P.(Civil) No.16530/2010 filed by the present review petitioner. The said order reads as under: “Mr.Altaf Ahmed, learned senior counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the petition in order to approach the High Court for expunging of the remarks made in the impugned judgment. The special leave petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 3. Annexed to the review petition is Schedule ‘A’ setting out the remarks/observations which are claimed to be expunged. With the assistance of Mr.Hegde, learned counsel for the petitioner we have gone through the contents of Schedule ‘A’ as well as our judgment dated 20th January 2010 and we are satisfied that there is no case made out to recall our observations. We also note that we have not made any adverse remarks or observations against any individual officials of CIDCO or any of its directors or the advocates/counsel appearing for it. We have also gone through the points set out in this review petition. We are satisfied that no case is made out to delete/expunge any of the observations made by us in our judgment dated 20th January 2010. 4. Hence the application is rejected summarily. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)