IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2011 / 14TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 6736 of 2011(N) --------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- K.PREMKUMAR, JR.SUPERINTENDENT, URBAN AFFAIRS DIRECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.P.KUTTAN, RESIDING AT MADONA, PAMPANCODE, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 19 BY ADV. SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH SMT.HEMALATHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS, DIRECTORATE OF URBAN AFFAIRS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL ADMINISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE FOR URBAN AFFAIRS (LOWER), REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER, DIRECTORATE OF URBAN AFFAIRS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. ADV.MR. SANDESH RAJA GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/04/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 6736 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: COPY OF THE FILED OF CHOICE LIST PREPARED BY R1. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE PRESCRIBED PROFORMA REPORT DTD NIL OF R1. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE NOTE DTD 31.1.2011. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF DPC ON 18.02.2011. EXT.P5: COPY OF MEMO OF CHARGES ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P6: COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ALLEGATION ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P7: COPY OF REPLY DTD 17.11.2007 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P8: COPY OF SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DTD 3/2/20111 ISSUED BY R3. EXT.P9: COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD 24.02.2011. TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE. S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ----------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.6736 OF 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of April, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “i) To issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ or order calling for records relating to the matter and quash Exhibits P4 to the extent petitioner is superseded therein, declaring it to be illegal; ii) To issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the respondents to cause convening the DPC on adhoc basis to consider the proposal in Exhibit P1 afresh, within a time limit; The learned counsel for the petitioner now submits that the petitioner would be satisfied with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P9 expeditiously. Having heard the learned Government Pleader also, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P9, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd