IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 7990 of 2010 Date of Decision: 4.5.2010 Smt. Anita Rani ....Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Virender Singh Punia, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize her services as Assistant Craft Teacher from 10.2.2004 and to promote her further as Crafts Teacher. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has directly approached this Court without first giving any notice of demand to the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner, Kaithal, at the first instance by making notice of demand. However, a direction be issued to him to decide the same in a given time-frame. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to serve notice of demand upon respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner, Kaithal for the claim made in the present writ petition. In case such a notice of demand is presented by the petitioner, the same shall be decided by the said respondent within a period of three months from the date of its filing by passing a speaking order. May 4, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE