1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.02.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.(MD).No.1206 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2011 A.O.Alagarsami ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Home Secretary, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Director General of Police, Police Director General Office, Beach Road, Chennai. 3.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Collectorate Complex, Madurai. 5.S.Kumaravel 6.Ganesan 7.The Inspector of Police, Thidir Nagar Police Station, Madurai. 8.Ganesan 9.Meena Selvaraj 10.R.Jeganathan 11.M.Pechimuthu 12.R.Sethu ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 5 to 8 from interfering in any way in the affairs of the Arulmigu Shri Sakthi Mariamman Temple, situated at D.No.273, West Masi Street, Madurai. For petitioner : Mr.R.Murugesan For respondents : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh 1 to 4 & 7 Government Advocate https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 ORDER The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents 5 to 8 from interfering in the affairs of the Temple viz., Arulmigu Shri Sakthi Mariamman Temple situated at West Masi Street, Madurai. 2.According to the petitioner, after purchasing a land he has constructed a temple at Door No.273, at West Masi Street, Madurai. The respondents 9 & 10 were associated with the temple in connection with Kumbabisekam. However, they have misappropriated the amount and as such they were removed from the temple trust. 3.The seventh respondent at the instigation of the fifth respondent served a notice on the petitioner on 23.09.2010 calling upon him to appear before the Inspector of Police, Thidir Nagar Police Station. This made the petitioner to file the writ petition. 4.When the writ petition came up for admission yesterday i.e., on 02.02.2011, I have directed the learned Government Advocate to take instructions from the seventh respondent. 5.The seventh respondent is present today. The learned Government Advocate on instructions would submit that the petitioner was summoned to the Police Station in connection with an enquiry to be conducted pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 13.09.2010 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10322 of 2010. The learned Government Advocate would further submit that a convenient date could be fixed so as to enable the petitioner to appear before the seventh respondent. 6.I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. 7.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to appear before the seventh respondent on 06.02.2011 at 10.00 a.m. 8.The learned Government Advocate on instructions would further submit that there are no other case pending against the petitioner and he was summoned only for the purpose of enquiry with respect to the order passed by this Court dated 13.09.2010 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10322 of 2010. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3 9.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to appear before the seventh respondent at 10.00 a.m. on 06.02.2011 in connection with the enquiry regarding the order passed by this Court dated 13.09.2010 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10322 of 2010. 10.The writ petition is disposed of with the direction. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(C.O.) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Home Secretary, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Director General of Police, Police Director General Office, Beach Road, Chennai. 3.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Collectorate Complex, Madurai. 5.The Inspector of Police, Thidir Nagar Police Station, Madurai. +1cc to Mr.R.Murugappan, Advocate Sr.No.4476 +1cc to The Special Government Pleader, Sr.No.4435 gcg akm/8.02.11 /3p-8c/ Order in W.P.(MD).No.1206 of 2011 03.02.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/