IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32837 of 2005(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. V.D.SHABU, VADAKKUDAN HOUSE, VADAKKE THORAVU, PUDUKKAD. 2. V.K.HANEEFA, VALIYAKATHU HOUSE, VADAKKETHORAVU, PUDUKKAD. 3. K.S.AJAYAN, KURUMALIKKAL HOUSE, VADAKKETHORAVU, PUDUKKAD. 4. T.K.GIRIJAN, THEKKEMADATHIL HOUSE, VADAKKETHORAVU, PUDUKKAD. 5. A.V.JOHNY, AUTOKKARAN VEEDU, VADAKKETHORAVU, PUDUKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.JOHN K.GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 2. THE GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, CIVIL LINES, THRISSUR. 3. THE S.I. OF POLICE, PUDUKKAD POLICE STATION, PUDUKKAD P.O. 4. THE SECRETARY, PUDUKKAD GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PUDUKKAD P.O. 5. T.N.SOMAN, THAYYIL VEEDU, VADAKKETHORAVU, P.O.PUDUKKAD. WPC NO.32837/05 -2- 6. K.G.RAJAN, KOZHAMBURATH VEEDU, VADAKKETHORAVU, P.O.PUDUKKAD. 7. GOPALAN V., VELUTHEDATH HOUSE, VADAKKETHORAVU, P.O.PUDUKKAD. 8. VELAYUDHAN V., VELUTHEDATH HOUSE, MARAVANCHERRY, P.O.CHENGALLUR. ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU FOR R4 GOVT.PLEADER SMT.SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.32837/05 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXT.P1: PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONERS 1, 3, 4 AND FEW OTHERS. EXT.P2: PHOTOCOPY OF THE ACKOWLEDGMENT RECEIPT OF THIS PETITION. EXT.P3: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITION BEFORE THE 3RD RESPODNENT DT 9.11.05. EXT.P4: PHOTOCOPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIPT. EXTS OF R5 EXT.R5a: TRUE COPY OF PERMIT DT 22.10.05 ISSUED TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT. EXT.R5b: TRUE COPY OF PERMIT DT 17.11.05 ISSUED TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 32837 OF 2005 ===================== Dated this the 24th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Complaining of illegal extraction of clay, the writ petition has been filed. 2. Though notice was issued by this Court, by lapse of time, the permit which enabled extraction of clay itself has expired. Therefore, at this distance of time, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the writ petition pending. Writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PA to Judge