BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER :- / Verendra%s/o Chandrabhan, aged about $Lyears, occupation— Daily wages employee relating to work of cleansing sanitation,conservancy,c /oPresident, C.G.Karmchrisangh,Safai Kamgar prakosth,Rajnandgaon, / Distt.Rajnandgaon (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Town Administration 8r, Development, Government of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). TheMunicipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon,Through the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon, District 1. AT BILASPUR QO H “w w.P.(s1N0. f)! 5 0F29ie—- ‘ Rajnandgaon (C,G_.) WRITM PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA " ' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Another. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Sudhir Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.1. Shri Aditya Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 07“ day of March, 201 1) y At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present petition as well as in Dhaniram & Others v. State ofChhattisgarh & Others] which was considered and decided by this Court on 20.01.201 1, are identical. Thereafter, the said issue was rc—considered in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others v. The State of Chhdltisgarh & Othersz, by this Court on 10.02.2011. Thus, the instant petition is squarely covered by the orders passed by this court in Dhaniram & Others’ and Virendra Das Manikpuri & Othersz. Notices were issued to the respondents on 10.02.2011 and a week’s time was granted to the respondents to seek instructions and tile response. Thereafter, the matter was taken up on 25.02.2011. Till date, no response has been tiled by the respondents. However, learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the above submission made by the petitioner. In view of the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, this petition is disposed of in terms of the orders passed 2 in Dhaniram & Others, and Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others . Sd/—' Satish K. Agnihotri Judge t 1 W.P.(S) No. 6798 of 2010, decided on 20.01.2011 2 W.P.(S) No. 7450 of2010 , decided on 10.02.2011 WRIT PETITION (S) No. 810 of 2011 PETITIONER : Verendra. VERSUS