IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M 16695 of 2009 Date of Decision: 14.10.2009 Sukhdev Sharma ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Punjab ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present : Mr.Vikram K.Chaudhari, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG Punjab for the respondent/State. Mr.Y.S.Dhillon, Advocate for the complainant. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (Oral) Counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the petitioner was an attesting witness of the sale deed. He further submits that in terms of the order passed by this Court dated 19.6.2009, the petitioner has joined the investigation. This fact is admitted by the counsel for the State, on instructions received from SI Tirlok Singh. State counsel further states that the petitioner is no more required for custodial interrogation. In view of the above, order dated 19.6.2009 is hereby made absolute. The petitioner shall abide by the provisions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition is disposed of. (Rakesh Kumar Jain) 14.10.2009 Judge Meenu