CLCON No. 212 of 2009 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Heard Sri N.C. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners and perused the record. By was of this contempt under the Contempt of Court Act, the petitioners have prayed to punish the respondents under the Contempt of Court Act for violating the order dated 07.11.2006 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 1667 (M/S) of 2006, Padma Datt Pande & others Vs Prakash Lal Sah & another. The grievance of the petitioners is that this Court vide order dated 07.11.2006 passed the order to maintain status quo but the respondents are not complying the order passed by this Court. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners at great length as well as perusing the record available before me, I am of the view that at this stage, there is no need to summon the respondents under the Contempt of Court Act. The writ petition is still pending before this Court Further the petitioners have not substantiated his allegation by adducing cogent and reliable evidence. No ground is made out to summon the respondents at this stage. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed in-limine. (B.C.K., J.) 10.06.2009 ASWAL