1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Cr.M.P. No. / ^ ^ / 200fi ^mnh Benct' Applicant (Accused) ^^^ cw 'gu •s» \:^^^-:. ^.•f[" ^Vyc.y-t". ...at< <^"^ c\..y" ^s-!&s' t=s'1 Non-Applicant (Complainant) Farida Bano 45 Yrs., w/o Iqbal Ahmed Subhas Nagar, PS Maudahapara, Raipur (CG) VERSUS State of Chattisgarh Through DM Raipur Impugnwg Final. Order in Criminal Reuision No. 283/^5 of I ASJ, Raifur dtd. 7/3/06 which confirmed OD 7/7/05 in Criminal Case No. 480/98 ofthe Court ofJMFC Raipur (Presided by Shri Kartik Ram). Attached as A-l. "'^s., XI-HC-78 an^T^r' gsirsTi^Tshtii* liy^ +11+1WI artTT^) 'ssi •^ww'if, ^ww, (sicii'y^i <^A7.A,Uo. (82/2^-0 6 TT^r ••.•.••••••••.••y....^j- 200 Sll^l 4ach (^q(^sl^ST) ??cnW(rf?tT3TI^T 28-02-2006 °bi'iif<-i41-f tiitii-iTffte^'<Ri^ii< ^srf^q'sn^T Shri Raja Sharma, Iear4ed coiiascl for fhe pedtioner. Shri G.K. Berhyat, Dy. 4dvocate General for the State. Heard on admission. This petition Iias bee^. directed a^eanst fhe onler dated 7.3.2006 passed ia criminal passed ia Cnminal Case No\ revisioa No. 283/2005 by the First Additional Sessions Judgc, R^ipur by wluch he has dismtesed fhe aforesaid revision aad has (fcoiifirmcd the order dErted 7.7.2005 480/98 by the Judidal Magistrate PirstClass, Raipiir. The facts are that 04 a coiaplaint beiag anade by the complainaat wife (PW-1) na|mely Nishad Bano, a clwjtge-sheet imder Section 498-A ofIPC a^Si Sectioa 5 offhe Dowiy Piohibition Act was filed against fhe l|iusbaad Jamaluddia, aiid 3 other pcrsons namefy Kamaludditi, Pharida Baao aad BabU were exonerated by the prosecut^on. On this, aa appUcadoa uader Section 319 of Cr.P.C. was ^fcd by fhe complaiaant prayiag (hat they shoiild also be added| as co-accused ia tfus case. Tbis appUcation was kept in abey^tuce and the proceedn^ of fhe trial coiamenced. Affcer examlna^ion of the piosecution wltaesscs namefy Nishad Bano (PW-lj) and Mohd. Washan (PW-2), the leamed Magisteate considerecjl this appBcation and iiltiiaately, (xn the basis ofevidence »ecordetlia the case, aUowed the same aad took cognizance agamst these Sectioa 319 Cr.P.C. Bemg persous by issuing siuaaioas, undcr |a^rieved wifh the aforasaid order passed by fhe M^istrate, ijbe petitioner (one of the said co- ^^ _P.TO. <S) XI-HC-78 sn^rifirf^iN; cPIT3T1^?Tshtli«b w 3ST "illiflcl^, tiiTny'lri, (slcfl'Hy .C^M.P.Ho, tS^/^-^3^ *iitiMi a^n^i ^ 200 Sll^l >ia<»)(yi(^q^ir) 5Tc(TW;rf?cI'311^1 ^ revlSlon tfae ^y accused) filed a crfmuial Sessions Court dismissed condGnned the order passed order fhe prescnt petition has Leamed coimsel for th^ sheet in the inatter was filed has taken cognizance on 7.7.: delay ia taldng such au Magtetratc as weU as fhe Sessi|( Section 319 of Cr.P.C. other persons appearmg to provides fhat where, ia fhe an oflfence, it appears fmva. tfa^ the accused has comruitted could be tned togefher with against such person Ssr the committed. Sub-sectfon (2) pn|i attendiD^; the Court, he inay| circumstances of fhe casel aforesaid. Sub-sections (3) proceedings. Needless to say fhat proceed agaiast other persoas| under Section 319 Cr.P.C. and| action on the basis of eaquiry or trial ofan offence 21005 acUon ti>e ccturse evideface Wqfepfl^ Wtlcffff fscfl'rf^CTT ^srf^ITSn^T bcfore the Sessions Court. Thc sald revision on 7.3.2006 and fhe Magisteate. It is against this Ibeen fited. petitioner ai^ues that the chaige- fn fhe year 1993 aad the Magistrate >, therefore, fhere is imreasoaable and the order passed by the ^ons Court may be set aside. provides power to proceed a^iast giulty of offence. Sub-secttoa (1) of aay laqiuiy iato, or tnal of, evidence that any person notbeiag |aay offcnce for which such pcrson accused, thc Court inay piocecd offence whfch he appears to haw ^vides thatwhere siich pcrson M not be arrested or suaunoaed, as the iiiay require, for the purpose $6 (4) provide for other iadidental ttiere te no limitation. prBscrBaed to appearfag to be guflty ofan ofifence fhe Court concemed bas to take the which coiaes in the course of the case may be. tfae a$ M XI-HC-78 HI*IWI Sb^l* 3ST -^iqic-i^, ®Tf1+f'l<o,fsldlti^'l, ^_Gr.fn,P. |2S/^-^C WT 200 3TT^TT5RT (^gf^^T) an^TqiTf^TW traTan^rg^Thi ^^.\^ IU ffliS0 1 SSH; g^cnwafgcrsn^T After goiag through th^ appears fhat tiiere is sufificien^ take recourse iiader Section 3: iUegality ia the order p^sed b}) Sessions Judge while proceeda^ The petition has ao merif aiotton staye itseU. evideace of PW-1 aad PW-2, it f: naaterial ^ainst fhis appMcaat to 1|9 of Cr.P.C. There appeara to be no ^> fhe Magtetrate or by fhe cowcesned. under Section 319 Cr.P.C. ts aad the same is disiaissed at the •Wlfi-Tift^ITTIRJf if fgc^-Tl^RR ^3:rf^TR'3f1^r /^- Sd/- SunU Kumar Sinha Judge /