IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33055 of 2011 Sita Ram Mahto, son of late Dular Chand Mahto, resident of village – Korbadha, P.S. – Samastipur (Mufassil), District – Samastipur. --------- Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ------Opposite Party ****** 02. 20.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Samastipur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 220/2011, G.R. No. 826/2011 for offences under Sections 323/324/341/307/427/34 of the Indian Penal Code, is named accused in this case with allegation of inflicting head injury on the informant in a petty dispute by means of Farsa. Submission is that there is continued land dispute between the parties and there is counter version also by way of Samastipur (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 222/2011 instituted at the instance of petitioner who also has sustained injury on head, but, there is no explanation on the part of prosecution and both the parties have sustained simple injuries. Moreover, from the petitioner’s side three persons have been injured taking into consideration of prolong civil dispute. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with Samastipur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 220/2011, G.R. No. 826/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)