MC 2928/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I A ANSARI Heard Mr. D. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the applicant. Perused the affi davit, dated 11.05.2010, showing service of notice on opposite party No. 1. Considering the averments made in the affidavit, the notice is treated a s served on opposite party No. 1. None has appeared on behalf of the opposite p arty No. 1 and/or opposite party No. 2 though notice has been served on opposite party No. 2. Considering the reasons assigned by the applicant for seeking condonatio n of delay, this Court is of the view that the applicant has assigned convincing reasons for their inability to prefer the appeal within time. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the prayer for cond onation of the delay of 26 days, in filing the appeal, is allowed. Let the appeal be registered accordingly and listed for admission hearin g. With the above observations and directions, this Misc. case stands dispo sed of.