916 1 IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.916 OF 2010 in NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1025 OF 2010 in SUIT NO.956 OF 2010 Mari Raman Devendra ... Appellant (Orig.Defendant no.1) vs Balaji Developers & ors ... Respondents. (Orig.Plaintiff & Defendant no.2) Mr.Sayed Zia i.b Mr.Mritunjay Barai for Appellant. Mr.V.A.Thorat,Sr.Advocate with Mr.S.K.Srivastava and Ms.Manorama Mohanty i.b S.K.Srivastava & Co for Respondent no.1 CORAM: D.K.Deshmukh and N.D.Deshpande, JJ DATED: 18 th November, 2010 P.C. 1. We have heard learned counsel for both the parties. What is challenged in the appeal is an ad interim order. By our order passed today in Writ Petition No.1162 of 2010 for the properties of Shri Ravishankar Gagubhai Charitable trust fresh bids have been directed to be invited. The learned counsel appearing for the Original plaintiff states before us that pursuant to the notice that will be issued inviting bids for the pr operties of the above referred trust, bids will be submitted by Mr.Chandrashekar Champalal Hingarh and Mr.Jayesh Amulakh Mehta independently and not in the name of M/s Balaji Developers. As the above referred two persons namely Mr.Chandrashekar Champalal Hingarh and Mr.Jayesh Amulakh Mehta who are plaintiffs in Suit No.956 of 2010 are not bidding in the name of the firm M/s Balaji Developers for the property, in our opinion, ad interim order passed by the learned Single Judge which is impugned in the appeal need not be disturbed. We, however request the learned Single Judge who is taking Notices of motion to hear and dispose of Notice of Motion No.1025 of 2010 as expeditiously as possible. It is clarified that the ad interim order will not come in the way of the defendant no.1 namely Mari Devendra from submitting bid in his own name or in any name other than M/s Balaji Developers for the properties. Appeal disposed of accordingly. Notice of Motion No. 2447 of 2010 also disposed of. D.K.Deshmukh, J N.D.Deshpande, J