HKJH COURT OF CHHATTISQARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (Sl NoA870 of 2007 Petitioners 1. Anand Kumw Das, S/o. Sri Wnod Bihari Das, aged about 46 yMrs, Occupation ^si^ant Teacher presenfly posted srt Adareh Middle Schod, Chhura. Blodc Chhura, District Ra^w (C.G.). 2. M'rtthuram Sahu, S/o. Sri Rartan Lal Sahu, aged aboirt 42 yeare, OccupaUon Assistant Teacher presenUy po^ed at Primary School, BhaNamuda, Bkwk Chhura, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Dwarika Rasad Jangre, S/o. Sri Guhham ^uigre, aged about 49 yeare. OccupaUon Assislant Teacher prese»dly postod at Primary School Jatiyatora, Block Chhura, District Raipur (C.G.) 4, Chaitu Lal Sahu, Qlo. Sri Ganesh Ram Sahu, aged about 55 years, Occupafion Assistant Teacher presentty posted at Primary School Damanbay, Kock Chhura, Distrirt Raipur (C.G.) 5. Bhola Kumar Yadav, Sto. Sri R.B. Yadav, aged about 49 yeare, Occupafion Assistant Teacher presently posted al Middle School Jsugaon, Bkack Chhura, District Raipur (C.G.) Versus 1. State of ChhatGsgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal WeBare, DKS Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commission®r,Department of TribalWeNare, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Block Educsdon Offioer, Chhura, District Raipur (C.G.) (Writ PeUtton under Article 226 of e ConstituUon of Indta) Sinafe Bench: Hon'bte Justfce SatejLK^AflmbQtri Respondents Present : Smtl-temidaSitklique.Advocateforthepetittoners. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. Advocate for fte State/ respodwts. ORDER (Passed on 11°'July. 2007) The petittonere were appointed as Assistant Teachers by the Ccrftector, CTribal Weffiare), Raipur victe order dated 31.12.1987 (S^ Indu (Annexure P-4), wherein it was provided that the petitionere would be granted regular pay scate of Rs.975-1650/- after a periodof one year. 2.The quesBon of law involved Is as to whether the peUUoners are entifled to regular pay scate w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date ofcomplefion of probation period. 3. Leamed coufisel appearing for the petitioner as wetl as for the respondents/State joirtty submit that the facte and quesUon of law involved in the present writ peUtion are ttie same to that of inW.P. (S) No.5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and otters Vs. State Govemment of Chhattisgarh and others), which was altowed vide orcter dated 7.11.2006. 4. In viewof the above-stated submisstons made by teamed counsel appearing for the parttes, the writ pettion is altowed in the same terms subject to verification ofthe facts. No order as to costs. I : Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri | ie i