^ ^ C^T- BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S)No. ^^ /2010 PETITIONER ^ 9l°....-^ ^^. ^>^ ^^ o^S ^A^ \ ^-. ^0' ^ ^'':^'\^- ^-??r" >'' y^ ....-' .^•'" RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1) Ganraj Singh Rajput S/o.- Shri Keju Singh, aged about 36 years, Sarswati Sishu Higher Secondary School, new khursipar, Bhilai Distt. Durg (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary Panchayat and Rural Welfare Department, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur(C.G.) 2) <: M ^:^ ^- ^^^"^J^' %€'^^y ^^^s^ Zila Panchayat Through :- Chief Executive Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. v M "3^ -^I^Kn^, ^Tll<-I^Co, [^Q11^^< ^ *11*1CTI %<<l<^» . v^.(.fS.)w2-?^z7lO^ N?'"""""'"^"/"-""""-"""/""^aee- 31T^I 'T^F ( ysf^q^) S^T'^RT f^'iicb 'TOT ^H^ST'^WSR' ^r ^wiW ^fta 3?n^l SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra SVIohan ^ 21-06-2010 Shri Anup Majumdar, counset fc| Ms/Sangeeta Mishra, Panel L^ on advance copy. Heard. Grievance ofthe petitioner as ^ vide order dated 22-02-2010 passed| Court had decided the controversy purposes of reckoning eiigibiljty; the p^ the same. r the petjtioner ^yer for the State/respondent No.1 }et out in the petitton is that though in W.P.(S.)No.4829 of 2008, this ^ith regard to cut-off date for the Ititioner is not being given benefit of !n the case of Ssndleep Kumai of Chhatti^garh & Others, passed b 2008 on 22-02.2010, it has been held • 17. It has been brought to th^ other Janpad Panchayats have been prescribed, but the auths . ofF date as 1 -I -2009 on the bas cjrcutated with memo dated 0; Thus, the out-off date for oandidates who have apptied Shiksha Karmi would be ths application form in the concerr as the cut-off date mentioned 11 cannot be considered, as the oM<l(<yl<fll 'HW^Jt ^ i^^ '?f^?R ^T3tR?H3?^ hrivastava. J. Shrivastav^ & ¥3. l? this Court jn W.P.(S) No.4829 of thus:- ^ notice of^this Court that given the cut-off date has sbrities have taken the cut- tis of mode! advertisement ^-01-2008 (Annexure P-1). the purppse of those f|3r setection cn the post of last date for filing the led subject advertisement, fh the model advertisement |;ut-off date on the ground ^TT^—FS/147—2/2010—1,00,000. r 3TI^?T ^f <RFTW TW 3?T^T ^TRT^ ^ w ^- 6\ *ii*<CTr w*ii<i» T^T ^I^ICI^, ^Tll^^Ko, [^cnKriy . ^<?.^r^.^ ^2/1010"^^eo ^n^TV ('i?^^?) ^R1TW^ft?[3^r ^—^. that firstly; the same was interhal it was not brought to the noti^e pursuant to the advertisemerlt, for seleotion on the post of Shi| 18. In view of foregoing, tt^e petitioners may be considerep, appointment, if vacancies af notified vacancies in advertisement. The cases of considered for grant of age| under the legal provisions. Ho^ the appointed candidates sha{ ground that they were| party/respondents in these pet|tions. tlhe tlie In view of the aforesaid orde^ consider the case ofthe petitioner als^ regard to his eiigibility in the tight ofth for the petitioner submits that he has to the Chief Executive Officer, Zil respondent authority shall consider ar|?d decide the representation of the |aw laid down by this Court in the l(supra). petitioner striotly in accordance with case of Sandeep Kuinar Shrivastava AocordJngSy, the petition is finall1 cdH(^<fll 'RFI^f ^fS^ ^N^$R '^3iRTH3TI^T circular and; secondly; of the candidates, v^ho, t, responded and applled ksha Karmis. ^ individuai cases of the for their setection and 1-e availabie as per the concerned subject petitioners may atso be relaxation, if permissible Ivever, it is made clear that not be disturbed on the not impleaded as , the respondents are obliged to and take appropriate decision with ^ aforesaid order. Learned Counsei |a!ready submitted a representation !^ Panchayat, Rajnandgaon. The ^ disposed of. W^N ^^gSUIT^T, <r5R^TT^—FS/147—2/2010 —1,00,000. ^o^n; ^a^AYa^A^ SVitlvastava