IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.215 of 2010. Date of Decision : 13.5.2010. Paramjit Singh ......Petitioner Versus Ekta Gyani ......Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Ms. Monita Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Sibal, Advocate, for the respondent. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) This petitioner's revision is directed against the order dated November 14 th, 2009 passed by Guardian Judge, Chandigarh, whereby, his application for supplying information with regard to past and future school reports, school records, extra curricular activities, that is, sports, music, hobby etc., medical record details, the amount spent on the school fee and other essential expenses, e-mail details and telephone numbers of his children, was dismissed in a petition under Sections 11 and 17 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 and Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 filed by him. 2. Paramjit Singh-petitioner and Ekta Gyani- respondent were married on March 27 th, 2000. Both of them went to United States of America. The petitioner is US citizen. Out of the wedlock, two children Sahir and Ameya were born on February 2 nd, 2002 and October 10 th, 2003 respectively. The relations between the parties were not cordial. In June 2006, the family came to India. Since then Ekta Gyani along with her children and parents is residing at Chandigarh. She filed petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Woman from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act at Chandigarh against the petitioner. A criminal complaint was also filed by the wife but the same was withdrawn on account of compromise between the parties. Civil Revision No.215 of 2010. (2) In the year 2008, petitioner filed the present petition under the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 at Chandigarh. The children are studying in Vivek High School, Chandigarh and being looked after by their mother. By order dated June 15 th, 2009, the parents of the petitioner, who are also residing at Chandigarh were allowed to meet the children. At one point of time, this Court by order dated January 6 th, 2009 allowed the petitioner to meet his children but inspite of that, as has been stated by learned counsel for the respondent, the petitioner met the children only once and not thereafter. In the impugned order, it has been observed that inspite of a number of opportunities, the petitioner did not lead any evidence in support of his petition. The instant application seeking information as stated above, has been filed just for the sake of filing and in case the information sought, is provided to the petitioner even then it will be of no use at all. The petitioner has not even appeared before the Court in which petition under section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act is pending. In the present petition, petitioner moved application before the Guardian Judge to adjourn the petition sine-die because of pendency of present revision petition before this Court. This shows that petitioner is not interested to get the decision of the petition filed by him rather, for one reason or the other, wants to delay it and to harass the respondent. 3. In this view of the matter, there is no illegality or irregularity discernible in the order passed by the Court below. Thus, the revision petition is dismissed. 4. It is recorded for the sake of clarity that the expression of the opinion in this order is only for the limited purpose of disposing of this revision petition and shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 13.5.2010. SN