*1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8525/2009 Kachardas Shankarlal Karwa. ..Petitioner -VERSUS- Nanasaheb Tukaram Nikam (decd.) and others. ..Respondents ............... Mr.Sagar Kasar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.M.M.Sathaye, Advocate for the Respondents. ............... CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. Dated 16th November, 2009. PC:- 1 This is a petition filed by the landlord-decree holder in whose favour the decree has been passed for ejectment and possession of the suit premises against the tenant-judgment debtor. Execution of decree has been objected by the Judgment Debtor by filing an application at Exhibit-23. 2 The learned counsel for the Petitioner/decree holder submits that the objection raised by the Respondents/Judgment Debtor in substance is an objection to the existence of the bonafide need of the landlord, on acceptance of which, the decree has been passed by the Trial Court in favour of the landlord which is maintained upto the Supreme Court. The submission is that the *2* objection is misconceived as the same is raised in the execution proceedings and unnecessarily the Executing Court instead of rejecting the same at the threshold, is entertaining the objection. 3 I have decided Writ Petition filed by the Judgment Debtor bearing No.6400/2009 and held that the objection raised by the Judgment Debtor is devoid of any merit. As the Writ Petition filed by the Judgment Debtor is dismissed by upholding the possession warrant, it is not necessary to decide the present petition as the same, in my view, is rendered infructuous. Thus, this petition is disposed of as infructuous. (A.P. Deshpande, J)