w« wwwm w IN THE HON BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ‘ r Mane. can»? N “V. . Tb 2007. SIB. $$§1§§£ aaqiti I W (SPECIAL LEAVE ) APPLICANT] Jamuna Prasad S/o. Antram, Dahire, _aged about — ’41 years, R/o. Gurukul Col0ny, Pendra Road, Police Station— Gaurela, District— Bilaspur AK (C.G.) VERSUS NON—APPLICANTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh. Through: — Collector, Bilaspur, District— Bilaspur (C.G.) Mohandas Dhritlahre S/o. Baishakh'uwa, aged about— .48 years, Smt. Killak Bai W/o. Mohan Das, aged about— 45 years, Prashant Dhritlahre S/o. Mohan Das, aged about- 18 years, AII of R/o. Gurukul Colony, Pendra Road, Police Station— Gaurela, Districte Bilaspur (C.G.) APPLICATION UNDER r EC ON 378 4 OF CRIMIN L PROCEDURE CODE JJ @ WW Wg, WW Cw M PN0$3¢ ' 3E N§$ V: . .. mm (W‘rw) l9?m 290 kWEW m+_.“ 3E: Em. $ustice Pritmmr Ewaker. 26.’W.2@@@: l Shri Vaibhav Gaverd an appears “Ear ihe appacané m? being appoin‘ted by th§s Com . y» He is heard an adm§ss om. ’A 'r . 7 ¥ he presem’z'pe‘c%’£§m1 is direciied aga'mS": the ii7§pugrwd ‘aémi 207.2QG? assed by *‘ihe Judic§a§ MagiS‘trme d Firé‘‘: Ciass,"Pandra Rcad m Crimina§ Ca$e Ni). £8212SQ§ acauifting nan—apmicanis 2. to I; f mg; agances puni$hab%e’ under $ecif0ns 294 and 323 £3 WC, Leamed Magis’:rate h¢1s acquitted the nan app§icants 2 “i0 4 maimy on ihe greund thqiii m respect 0f ’ihe offence undEi' sect‘mn 294 KPC there §s n‘P evidence avaiiabie on record “t0 show iha'i any annoyancelww caused m the app§icam in refaiicm 'Eo fhe offeme Lgnder Section 323 IPC @amed Magi‘s'tra‘ie ha$ held 'tha‘t §r§c§ependent witness — Shivaandan :3W—3 has not suppeéed ihie case a? the prosecufisn and ‘the etaiemem 9f the appiican‘ii cehnei be saEé *co be wer‘ihy 0’? credemce ae ’ihe meeiica§ feper’x a%se does not suppert we 1 V$FS§OR J I ~,.«_,._, ,._,,w . T The material avaiiabl on record shows ihai whi§e passing i‘he 5'udgmeni impugned ac uit‘iia‘g the non~appiicants 2 to 4 0f the offences under secii n 294 and 323134 §PC {earned Mag§siraie has eiabarawy piis£3ussed me evidence aeieiueed by ‘thef reepective pai’i‘ies. Mo iiiegaiiiy in ”she judgment 0f acquitiai :fk. iiing for interference wiih 'i‘he same. sce and is accerdingiy dismissed. Sdl- V 1 vritink‘er Diwaker ‘ Judge ‘ WW W 2QG am WW swam (Wa) WWW mm -2? WtmWWW Emw 3am