1 wp1935.10 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1935 OF 2010 Mahadev T. Kambale. ....Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & ors. ....Respondents Mr.Amit Sale with Sandeep Babar for petitioner. Mr. A.S.Gadkari, APP for State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND U.D.SALVI, JJ DATED:- AUGUST 30, 2010 P.C. 1. Learned APP submits that even if the grievance of the Petitioner is accepted as it is, it would be a case for initiating action under the provisions of Corruption Act. That complaint will have to be made to Anti Corruption Bureau, Satara Unit. The annexure appended to the Petitioner does not indicate that such complaint has been made by the Petitioner so far. Realising this position, Counsel for the Petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw this Petition, so 2 wp1935.10 that the Petitioner can make formal complaint to the Anti Corruption Bureau, who in turn will be obliged to take necessary action in accordance with law. Petition disposed of accordingly. (U.D.SALVI, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)