IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7492 of 2011 MD. MAHMOOD ALAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 2 28.2.2011 This is an application for restoration of Cr.Misc.No. 24728 of 2010 which stood rejected for not having complied with the peremptory order dated 20.12.2010 within time granted to the petitioner to take steps for fresh service of notice on opposite party no.2 under both processes. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he understood that the time was allowed for necessary requisites is after two weeks of X-Mas vacation, as such necessary requisites were filed on 5.1.2011 and later on he came to know that petition has been dismissed due to non-compliance of order dated 20.12.2010. In view of submissions, the restoration application is allowed and Cr.Misc.No.24728 of 2010 is restored to its original file. Let necessary requisites under both processes, if filed by the petitioner for issuance of notice on opposite party no.2 be accepted. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)