-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS LETTERS LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (St.) NO. 2841 OF 2005 PATENT APPEAL (St.) NO. 2841 OF 2005 PATENT APPEAL (St.) NO. 2841 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5698 OF 2004 The Settlement Commissioner for Compenation Pool Properties-cum- Custodian of Evacuee Properties. ... Appellant. Versus Mr. Ravi Chamanlal Saigal & Ors..... Respondents. Mr. Parag Shelkar with Mr. A.M.Kuklarni for the Appellant. Mr. P.K.Dhakephalkar with Mr. S.N.Dhakephalkar for Respondent No.1. Mr. A. A. Garge with Mr. N.R.Bubna for Respondent No.2. CORAM CORAM CORAM : V. G. PALSHIKAR & : V. G. PALSHIKAR & : V. G. PALSHIKAR & D. D. D. B. BHOSALE, JJ. B. BHOSALE, JJ. B. BHOSALE, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : OCTOBER 26, 2005. : OCTOBER 26, 2005. : OCTOBER 26, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : Request by the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant for adjournment rejected. This appeal is directed against the order passed on 6th August, 2004 by the learned single Judge of -: 2 :- this Court. By the impugned order, the learned single Judge has permitted the petitioners therein to withdraw the petition with liberty to file appeal against the order impugned in that petition before the Chief Settlement Commissioner. The present Appellant cannot be aggrieved by such order. Apart from that, no appeal is tenable where order impugned is one of permitting withdrawal of the petition. Hence appeal is dismissed. Consequently, the civil applications are also rejected. **************