f-rf-.,..--fl*rl•I •^ A c^'i-w)^-^- \ In the Hon'ble Hish Court of Chhattisgarh. Bilaspur. W.P.No....^^3.^.2006 e:?/ '-', l"S' w Petitioner I/'^ ^s^ ...:^^B" •"" ^>'":. w ^•^ y •^•' <?^- Brijlal Sahu aged 67 years, S/o Budhram Saliu -.. G.P.F. Account No. EDN/MP/68351 •"-"' Retired Head Master, Chendriban, Nawagaon, Block and Tahsil Daundilohara, District Durg (C.G) Versus Respondents (1. 2. 3. ^p^ .•r\ \^y ^(1^^^ &.• /"•-\s- </.4. The State Govt. of.Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Accountant General, (Lekha and Hakdari) Nidhi-3, S. C. Shell ^ta- Raipur, C.G. Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Tatenga, Tahsil Daundi Lohara, District Diirg(C.G.) Block Education OfGcer, Dondi Lohara, Distt. Dyrg (C.G.) ^>0^/ /o^—4 ^ // <^. '\'^>.' -"*", \?S t .,»•?' i ! A^<^ !-!! ^ c.'*' '•^-—-^'f/y /'i 77^ C-, '" A^ "u&u Writ Petition Under Articles 226/227 ofThe Constitution Oflndia (01: the issuance of WRIT in the nature of MANDAMUS certioniri. Prohibition and for other suitable writ or<*writs, order or order.s, direction or directions. 1. Particulars ofthe Petitioner - •< As stated above. r •r1 XI-HC-78 *TWcn a>*ii<h 73f-WvPV, Vnf\Wl6, Rlcliuy ^^.\^.^.^>...4<§..^^200^ gn^Tira^T (igfg^r) sn^T g;T f^iN; crar sn^r g>qra; ' -4< ••a' ^>^-j OTgTWtifN'sTi^T communicdition Tatejiga 14-8-2006 Heard Shri Ajay Shrivast^ra, Shri Satish Gupta, Deputy and4. Shri S.K. Beriwal, Standing The main grievance of the petj 1-tead Master and on attaining the agf on 1-8-2002. As per the Govt. Higher Secondary School, an amount of Rs.1,73,816/- was in th| and same was to be paid to the petit|i passed final order for payment In the ciroumstances, learned petitioner may be allowed to make a be directed to decide the same, to wHii no objection. Havjng heard leamed oouRsel| and ciroumstances of the case, and vi| ofthecase, the petitioner is allowed to| with a oopy of this petition to responi today and in turn, respondent No.2 orders regarding final payment of GPff atong with interest payabte up to th^ months from the date of reoeipt of repr With the direotion aforesaid, th< Consequently, M.(W.)P. No.33| Parties are entitled for certified *i'!iFci'!fl-i iitidTffteI^t<l''i«i< ^srf^n'sn^T c|ounsel for the petitioner. . <^ivt. Advpcate fbr the respondents No.1, 3 Cc|unsel for respondent No.2. tioner is that the petitioner was working as 3^ of superannuation he demitted the office Annexure-P/1 sent by the Principal, to respondent No.2 dated 10-1-2003, account ofthe petitioner as GPF amount foner, but so far, respondent No.2 has not ofGPRamount. 4ounsel for the petitioner submitted that the t-epresentation to respondent No.2 and he |ich learned counset for respondents have |for the parties, having regard to the facts (ithout expressingany opinion on the merit make a detailed representation with along lent No.2 within a perio<l of 10 days from ^hall decide the representation and pass after examining the case of the petitioner date of payment, within a period of 2 Issentation, in accordance with law. ^ petition stands disposed of. [19/2006 also stands disposed of, |;opy ofthis order. L.C.Bhadoo ie P.T.O. *' '^~ y/-^ /l^ ^ .^ ^ /^ ^ / j*