IMTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.l W. P. CARTICLE 2271 N0. f 31 /2010 si.t BENCH PETITIONERS PLAINTIFFS \ ..-;\^ ^"'.y- ^^ ..-^" ^-^•^ ^y ^^ 1. Sita Ram, aged about 50 years, Son of Indarmal Agrawal, 2. Shyam Sundar, aged about 48 years, Son of Indarmal Agrawal, 3. BihariLal,aged about 46 years, Son of Indarmal Agrawal, All R/o. Ward No.4, Sakti, Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4. Mamta Devi, aged about 34 years, Daughter of Indarmal Agrawal, wife of Sajan Kumar Agrawal, R/o. Village Dhurkot, Tahsil Dabhara, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), VERSUS Shiv Kumar, aged about 52 years, Son of Sagarmal Agrawal, R/o. Ward No. 8, Sakti, Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APpRQpRlATE RESPONDENT DEFENDANT WRIT OR MANDAMUS/ CERTIORARI. ORDER/ OROERS, DIRECTION/ DIRECTIONS ETC. i V31SISS'SSiSSSiSS9SK9iiSSSiiSSSSSi'^^ SIBKSSBNBBSISStSMKBISWSSMllSNISSSIK « l:w 'S£B:^;.II»m'1^iSBa SRrasliiJffiBite^mi^;Kfish :;:'.!::":v •-'•.•W^I'^itixm^iZffiNo.lSl/ZOltt.-.y^^ -PETmONERS^'.''1' '^: RESPONDENT Sijta^maridotKers .^•"Versus,' ' • •:•', SMvKumar Aopearariee: . ::.!':' ; „ i. :::..:1'. •:': :" :.. ^^^^^ s^ Shn Sushoblut Suigh, Jcounsel fiM' ttie|respoadent^ WMTPETlTlONIJiNDERAmaCI^^CMFTHE ::.•GQNS'En'®TI<MSR:(>FliWDlA/'W ..: -: ^:^ : :•: ^"•^••.KI.?^'l.'-;l-..QRAI;^Qffl)ER': :1. • ^ :,; ; ' ; ..-' • :1 '?;^;®S:^3'?'^^ffi»@3l:^f :On'..att.-aF^iBaa®gti|lBc(g|in^|g!s|||<^ responderitiyefendant, tiis trial court hasstayedlurtt^ipKiGiee^t^ the presentsuiti.e. GivUSuitNo;8-&aQ06. res (2) Leamed trial «»urt ^^^^^^^^^^^^^o^ gspondent/defendant has;filedasuh^(^ K.''a>i.1.^' •".•;..'. .:,::•' ' 1°''1'.1^: ••..l.'^^^t::--:;.^^ .'..•.:,' ••:•:•. iKsameproperty. Thepartiesmbc^tliest^aswe^ isc<:mMnon.Thus,thetriat<x»urtv^pf^ sinutantymissuethepTesentsmtdes^^ (3) On a query beirig made^lxlffi the ccmnstel wo^ both tiie suits are pending consideration in the samefcourt t;e. Civil JudgeGlass-II, Sakti. ; (4)Inthis^ewoffhelBaf^itis^rec^ bytheraspbnd^on 21^10^^ m8^ •fftU ]? !>• ^»'i:n <^?^ '.:;- ^"•^sfSfiS^--^:; 1%^S®S®^S ^%1^^^^^^^ Siffi s'swn WvWVSt'l!S!9SSt petitionerson 8/02/2006 betried togetfaer sothatthe p^^ ofthe casecan aSsert their claim. ^5) With this observation, the mstant vmt petition^s^ of. Sd//- PrashantKumarMishra Judge l^ 't^,.7~ 11.3 I?