1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.318 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6118 OF 2007 Maharashtra Under Privileged Teachers Association ..Petitioner Versus Dr.Tilak R.Kem, Secretary, University Grants Commission and anr. ..Respondents Mr B.L.Sagar-Killarikar, Advocate for petitioner, absent Respondents 1 and 2 served CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 7th December 2011 PER COURT The contempt petitioner feels that the representations are not yet decided by the respondents-authorities. In spite of service, respondents- authorities absent. There is even nothing from the petitioner by way of any communication after 2008, to inform that the representation is not attended to by the respondents-authorities. Consequently, petition disposed of. ( K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. ) (vvr/318.08cp)