IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Civil Revision No.: 23 of 2010. Decided on: 24.11.2010. _________________________________________________________ Shiv Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus Taro Devi and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner on the basis of instructions imparted to him by his client submits that the present petition will be withdrawn in case the landlords permit the tenant to stay in the demised premises for a period of two years. 2. Mr. Ajay Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents, on the basis of instructions imparted to him by his clients submits that the period of six months is reasonable. However, the Court is of the considered opinion that the tenant can be permitted to stay in the demised premises for a period of fifteen months after giving usual undertaking to vacate the premises immediately after fifteen months with a further undertaking to keep on paying the use and occupation charges to the landlords. There shall, however, be a rider that the tenant shall 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - pay the enhanced rent at the rate of ` 750/- per month from today onwards. It is also made clear that the tenant shall also clear all the arrears, if pending @ ` 600/- per month. 3. In view of the observations made hereinabove, the present petition is rendered infructuous. The tenant is directed to hand over vacant possession of the demised premises to landlords on of before 29th February, 2012. He shall pay the use and occupation charges, as observed hereinabove, at the enhanced rate of rent of ` 750/- per month from today. He shall clear all the arrears within a period of three months from today, if any. It is made clear that the terms and conditions to be incorporated in the usual undertaking are required to be implemented and followed faithfully and punctually. Any dereliction or violation of the terms and conditions of the usual undertaking will amount to contempt of Court. The undertaking be furnished within a period of three weeks from today. 4. Accordingly, in view of the above discussion, the petition is disposed of. Cross Objection No.82 of 2010. In view of disposal of the civil review petition, the cross objections are rendered infructuous. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. November 24, 2010. (sck).