THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CONTEMPT CASE No. 1570 OF 2011 Dated: 20.12.2011 Between : S.Mahatma Reddy … Petitioner And Sri Maqbool Ahmed and another … Respondents The Court made the following:- THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CONTEMPT CASE No.1570 OF 2011 O R D E R: This contempt case is filed alleging violation of the order dated 20.07.2011 in Writ Petition No.20364 of 2011, whereunder the respondents herein were directed to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 29.03.2011 with regard to the alleged unauthorised installation of cell tower by Messrs. Reliance Communications Limited and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, it is stated that in terms of the directions issued by this Court, the site was inspected on 20.10.2011 and on enquiry, it was found that the Reliance Communications Limited had erected the ground based cell tower in plot No.14 by taking the said plot on lease about five years back. Notices were issued to the petitioner as well as the Reliance Communications Limited and the hearing was held on 18.11.2011 and 23.11.2011. In the meanwhile, it is brought to the notice of the respondents that Reliance Communications Limited filed Writ Petition No.12314 of 2009 and in the said writ petition, an interim order was passed on 24.06.2009 directing the respondents not to demolish or remove the towers erected by Messrs. Reliance Communications Limited. Having regard to the said interim order, the Corporation has communicated to the petitioner by letter dated 13.12.2011 that no action could be initiated for removal of the cell tower. That apart, by letter dated 13.12.2011, Messrs. Reliance Communications Limited was also called upon to submit the Demand Draft for Rs.1-00 lakh towards fee drawn in favour of the Commissioner, GHMC, the structural stability report, drawings and soil test report for considering its application in pursuance of G.O.Ms.No.183, dated 27.02.2008. In view of the steps taken by the respondents, particularly the interim stay granted by this Court in Writ Petition No.12314 of 2009, I do not find any substance in the allegation of the petitioner that the respondents herein had deliberately flouted the order of this court. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No costs. ___________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 20.12.2011 Ivd