THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.7814 OF 2010 Dated 8th April, 2010 Between: Hari Diwakaran …Petitioner And 1.The Superintendent of Police, Eluru, West Godavari District and 5 others. …Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.B.P.Raju Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP for Home Counsel for Respondent Nos.4 & 5: ----- The Court made the following Order: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue an appropriate writ, direction or order, more particularly writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and declaring the action of the 4th respondent filed a private complaint before the II Additional Judicial I Class Magistrate, Tanuku, West Godavari District and again filed a complaint before the A.P.State Human Rights Commission at Hyderabad and again filed a complaint before the 5th and 6th respondents are highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and clear violation of Article 20 (2) of the Constitution of India and consequently, to set aside the proceedings H.R.C.No.1625/2010, dated 15- 03-2010, on the file of A.P.State Human Rights Commission at Hyderabad and Rc.No.40-2/2009, dated 01-04-2010, on the file of the Deputy Educational Officer, Tanuku, West Godavari District.” After arguing the case for some time, Sri B.P.Raju, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to the petitioner to defend himself before different Fora in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty in terms of the prayer made. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.Nos.10037 & 10038 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 8th April, 2010 lur