1 srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Appellate Side Criminal Writ Petition No.2297 of 2008 Sanjay Parab Petitioner Vs. The Senior Inspector of Police, Manmad Police Station, Dist. Nasik & ors. Respondents None for petitioner. Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & SMT.ROSHAN S. DALVI,JJ. August 24, 2009. P.C. 1. None appears for the petitioners. Notice issued to the respondent no.4 has been returned unserved with a prayer to extend the time. On 30th March 2009 when the petition was called out for admission, none was present for the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that he had approached the respondent no.1 with a complaint for offences punishable under Sections 422, 323, 351, 463, 467 and 506 read with Section 34 of IPC against respondent nos.4 to 24 and the said complaint was not registered. Hence this petition. 2 2. If the petitioner approaches the respondent no.2 and files a fresh complaint in respect of the very same incident or incidents, within a period of two weeks from today, we direct the respondent no.2 to take appropriate action as stipulated under Section 154(3) of Cr.P.C. and proceed with the complaint. In case the respondent no.2 fails to act upon the complaint so filed, as required under Section 154(3) of Cr.P.C., within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing of the complaint by the petitioner, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the competent Court of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class and file a private complaint under Section 190 read with Section 200 of Cr.P.C. 3. Petition is disposed off accordingly. A copy of this order to go the respondent no.2 forthwith. (SMT.ROSHAN S. DALVI,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)