Hi.. ^.(i^- THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPVR, G.G. WRIT PETITION NO.Z21^2003/ PETITIONER Roop Sai S/o Ameer Sai, aged about 55 years, caste Rajwar, R/o Village Beerpur, poUce station Jainagar, Tahsil Su'ajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) .^9 RESPONDENTS .A^S^ ..^§?' .^^j?^' ^^^^- <1^^>' ^^-" y\*' VERSUS 1) Ishwar S/o Surjan, aged about 50 years, caste Rajwar, R/o Village Beerpur, police station Jainagar, Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 2) StateofChhattisgarhthrough Secretary, Revenue D.K.S. Bhawan D.K. Raipur(C.G.) WRTT PETTHON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF BNDIA 3a-HC-22 's^'^pSvR, ^•A'y'iio, (awi'»<i< 3ff^?l'tRE^ _M^5^^M2^ W*WII WNI<0 waw Ri'txyr" |;|^. ^at^i^t • fl^ SE^sign ^WfVft BI!WIIM 1 ;lii r li' ^' ;•' M.! ^ Stft;% ?^<tP9< w^a 25.08.2003 ,an Shri Adiok faimar Shukia, coui(se Smt. ' Ghitra Shrivastava] State/respondent No.2. By this petition under .Ar^iciej India, the petiticmer seSks toi ehal passed by •the Board'of'Revenue, G^i No.l/A-19A)2-03; ' ; The jaetitioner's Base is thafj settl^menf of laids beou-ing si.irveyj survey No.219/48 areai ©.37aere in hj !the ground •tftattiie petitioner is in Inentidne^; fandsj ianejl BssidtFig oveFJ lconstruc'ted a house etc. The ^eti Shumi Swcimi Lsasa with^regoird to ti'i| ENaib Tehsildar re.iectscl 1+ie samel Ipreferred by^l-he petFt-ioner ^befol [5urajpur. Th&S;b.Q. aljscKorrfiranett (Therefore, agsiftst A:he: fft*ele!-*of Nliei {before the Commtesioner, BitiaspiHl", |iearmg the appegl on its^ mepit^/r'e.jt Pimitgtioh. • ThereTQre, .ssgSMnst^'i'hel 'wtofeitBrt'if%^"^ ^K siPat an^( for the petitioner. Panet . Lawyer for the 226/227 of -tiie Constitution of ige the order dated 11X>6.2003 iha+t'iSgarh, in Revenue Revisiori jhe had filed On applicotion for No.322/15 area 1.25 acre wd Esname before Naib Tehsildar on |onstgnt possession o'f the above Were for a long tims fiaving •ioner had prayed for providing ifeabove ©overnmentland butthe ^on merits and an lappeqi wds l^ sthe Sub t>ivision&l Officer, •pe drder of the Ndi^ "Fehsiidar. ^ 0.,an appedi'wa| preferr&d The Commissioner lins1®a<:liof s^|e<} the:°Siime bn th? grouridjof 'elrder of the Commissione!- id iii tiiii ms TJ] -HC-22 ii'^ illl i j WIEIOIIS i! ;*<lN>»%8 5:11 i^ w.^1 ^i' ^??fCTm,'^ftwi% treroy Wtpii 9»'i»i* si(t^r xR^r ISS^Q "'^,2003. 3ifer1?WBC»fta -2L CB1 revision vws preferred by the TTie Board of ftevenue without rejected the revision on merits (Annexurs P-1). Therefore; t( writ/direetion/brder in the naturj to direct the toncerned Rei«nue| w the name of the petitioner orderdated tl.06.2003. I have heard the leamed learned Pane! Ldwyer for the Stat Le<irned counsel for the ^ question standis in the name of Ishwar has filed s civil suit befoi the title aid irijunction^nd in tha-1 party. A perusat of the order reveals that a civii. suit regard therefore, the setTiement proces land cannot be recorc^d in ttenan pe-t|tioner bsfore the Board of Revenue. H^aring the coun^l for the pstitioner 11.06.2083 by the impughed order le Gourt may please to issue a of writ of ceri-iorari and mcndamus lAuthority to seti-le the abo^ Idnds |uashing their orders including the The civjl suit |is penctmg declaration of!the title in whieh t^ of the parties flfter^recording th based on tNfe jevidenes produced WlfePftt'Wftff'^'tt'Sft < ^^nan^, counse! for the petitjoner and the ;/respondent No.2. stitioner submits that the lcmd in wvwnment and one person. nameiy; |e the civil Court forldsclaration of suit, the petitioner herein is also a |f the Tehsildar dated 13.07.2000 |hg the very lond is pending •dncl (dihgs cannot be taken up and the (e ®f1+ie petitioner. i i^tween the psrt-ies 1'egarding the Civil Court has to decide theititle ife evidence cnd deci!:l(ng the issues |y the parties,since|d cwt suijt is J^ia^fi 1 iia •I :-'i§ Wt •SI.:1;-[I!1 r 1 :!: ^ 11'T"~t Ss.Ss'^-wKs-S^S^ h.,il SfSf' K'SSMB-22- Soma '3^|wR'|t®B|i,j^s|^B:ri^'l^i^^t •^B^'i^SL,,.,„,.••.:• •I ^,^>^2-&{~7/ ^nwww''"'"""^'-3'"^"^'-'-^ iw^ aiready pendihg regarding the title and, moreover disputed faj can be decided only after recij question as to who is entitli?d fpJ In view of the above tvj maintainableandthesameisliayie Ths wnt petition starids c|; Consequently, JSA.(W^P.Nf aiso stand disposed of. ° |hd in question for dectarationof the fcts are involved in this matter whieh |rdmg the^evidence for dedding the I cleciaration of the title. |o grounds, this writ petition is not to be dismissed in iimine. |spqsed of. a.2001/2003 and I.A.No.6801/2003 Sd/- , L.C.BHADOO JUdge'