IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.945 OF 2004 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.1638 OF 2004 Pragna Yogendra Shah ..Plaintiff Vs. Harilal Liladhar and Sona and Ors. ..Defendants Mr.Swapnil Bangur i/b G.S.Mansawala for the plaintiffs Mr.A.M.Saraogi for the defendant CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J CORAM : S.U.KAMDAR, J DATED : 17TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED : 17TH OCTOBER, 2005 DATED : 17TH OCTOBER, 2005 P.C.: . Bill of exchanges are dt.28.8.99 and 12.11.99. Suit is lodged on 8.4.04. Thus claim is ex-facie barred by the law of limitation. The amount under the said bill of exchange was payable on demand. However, the learned counsel for the plaintiff contends that Ex.C is the acknowledgment but he admits that it is not signed by the defendants. In that view of the matter, there is unconditional leave to defend because the claim is barred by the law of limitation. Summons for Judgment is dismissed accordingly. No order as to costs.