THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B,PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2408 OF 2009 DT.03.02.2011 Between: Margadarsi Chit Fund Ltd., Petitioner Vs. M/s.Kedariswara Industries, represented by its Partner Badanandam Pragathi Industrial Estates, Warangal and four others. …………………Respondents. O R D E R: The petitioner who is the plaintiff filed this revision petition assailing the correctness of the order, dated 04.03.2009 passed in I.A.No.36 of 2009 in O.S.No.796 of 2001 on the file of VIII Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC), City Civil Court, Hyderabad, wherein the application filed by the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 14 (3) read with Section 151 of C.P.C., to receive the documents and to take on record the additional documentary evidence was dismissed. Since the application filed by the petitioner is to receive the documents in evidence, which enables the petitioner to establish the basic ingredients of Section 65 of the Evidence Act, I think it just and reasonable to direct the court below to consider the aspects in regard to Section 65 of the Act and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The revision petition is accordingly allowed. No order as to costs. _____________​____ B.PRAKASH RAO J., Dt.03.02.2011 tjs