IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2890 of 1983 Date of decision: 8-8-1996 For Approval and Signature The Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. K. KESHOTE 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India,1950 or any order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- MAHOBATSINH KHURMANSINH PARMAR Versus MADHUSUDAN CHAMPANARIA OR HIS SUCCESSOR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: Mr. G.R. Udhwani for MR KG VAKHARIA for Petitioners Mr. Nigam Shukla for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE Date of decision: 08/08/96 ORAL JUDGEMENT Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement that petitioner No.4 has already retired from service. Other three petitioners are in service. Challenge has been made by the petitioners to the orders annexure A dated 25th May, 1983 by which the petitioners have been transferred from one school to another school. These orders of transfer of the petitioners were stayed by this court on 22nd June, 1983 and they were not given effect and the petitioners are continued on the posts. In view of this position it is not necessary to to into the merits of the matter. As the orders of transfer were stayed by this Court on 22-6-1983, interest of justice will be served by disposing of the petition in terms of the interim order, with clarification that it shall be open to the respondents now to transfer the petitioners if administrative exigencies so demand. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. ........