IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FA No.637 of 2000 1. SITA RAM BHAT 2. FUL NARAYAN BHAT, BOTH SONS OF SRI KULDIP BHAT, RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE BAL BANDH, P.S. CHAROPOKHARI, DISTRICT BHOJPUR--- DEFENDANTS---APPELLANTS Versus 1. SRI RAM BHAT, SON OF MUNDRADIP BHAT 2. KAMLESH BHAT, SON OF SUNDRADIP BHAT 3. SURESH BHAT, SON OF SUNDRADIP BHAT ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE BAL BANDH, P.S. CHARPOKHRI, DISTRICT BHOJPUR------PLAINTIFF—RESPONDENT 1ST SET. 4. NARAYAN BHAT 5. SHYAM NARAYAN BHAT 6. RAM AYODHAYA BHAT, ALL SONS OF KULDIP BHAT 7. ARYA KUMAR BHAT, SON OF NAG NARAYAN BHAT 8. NIRAJ KUMAR BHAT(MINOR) SON OF NAG NARAYAN BHAT, 9. CHUNNI BHAT(MINOR), SON OF NAG NARAYAN BHAT, UNDER THE GUARDIANSHIP OF MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND 10. GOGA DEVI, WIFE OF NAG NARAYAN BHAT 11. RUP NARAYAN BHAT, SON OF KULDIP BHAT ALL RESIDNET OF VILLAGE BAL BANDH, P.S. CHARPOKHARI, DISTRICT BHOJPUR---DEFENDANT—RESPONDENT 2ND SET 12. RAN BASO DEVI, WIFE OF RAMJEE KUER 13. FULBASO DEVI, WIFE OF LAXMAN KUER BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. GAUDARH, P.S. SHASHPUR, DISTRICT BHOJPUR 14. ILBASO DEVI, WIFE OF SURENDRA ROY, R/V TELARH, P.O. AGIAON, P.S. PIRO, DISTRICT BHOJPUR---DEFENDANT---RESPONDENT 3RD SET. ----------- 13. 13.05.2009 In view of the office note dated 24.4.2009, it is evident that the appeal has become incompetent as the memo of appeal stood rejected on 16.3.2009 as against respondent nos. 1 to 14, which is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)