IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3504 of 2004. Shakil Ahmed son of Shri Yasin Khan. VERSUS Tholu and Pyare sons of Shri Thampa All & Others Date Of Order ::: 13/03/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain J. Mr. N.L. Pareek, Counsel for the Petitioner Mr. D.K. Garg, Counsel for the respondents By the Court : Heard learned counsel for the parties. The plaintiff/petitioner filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of disputed land in the trial Court, which was decreed. Being aggrieved with the same, an appeal was preferred by the defendants, which was allowed by the Revenue Appellate Authority vide its judgment dated 18.07.2001. Thereafter, the plaintiff preferred second appeal before the Revenue Board, which was dismissed vide order dated 28.04.2004. Being aggrieved with the same, the plaintiff has preferred this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Learned counsel for both the parties have argued the case at length. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for both the parties. The Revenue Appellate Authority as well as Revenue Board, both have considered the Revenue record available in the present case and according to that record the defendant was shown as tenant of the disputed land in the Samwat year 2012 (corresponding year, 1955) when the Rajasthan Tenancy Act came into force. By virtue of Section 15 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, the defendants were declared, as tenants of the disputed land. The Revenue Appellate Authority as well as the Revenue Board, both have considered the evidence available on record in detail and also the provisions of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act and rightly dismissed the suit of the plaintiff/petitioner. I do not find any legal or factual error in the findings recorded by the Revenue Appellate Authority and Revenue Board. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. ashok/