IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33143 of 2010 RAMBHA DEVI WIFE OF ASHOK CHAUDHARY, D/O MOHAN CHAUDHARY, R/V JURAPAKARI , P.S. BHAIROGANJ, DISTRICT- WEST CHAMPARAN………….. PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR…………………….. OPP. PARTY ----------- 2 09-09-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is a lady who has been named as an accused in a case under section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the informant who is father of the victim lady has not disclosed anything to suggest that petitioner is a relation of the husband of the victim lady. It has been admitted in the F.I.R. that because of petitioner’s interest the marriage had been solemnized and the only adverse material used against the petitioner is a statement that on the date of occurrence she has visited the house of the victim’s husband. It has been submitted that petitioner might have gone there on that date for some other reason but may not have been present at the time of actual occurrence. Considering all the facts and circumstances the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks, let petitioner Rambha Devi be 2 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.7,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M. Bagha in connection with Ram Nagar P.S. Case No. 166 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down under sections 438(2) Cr.P.C. Naresh ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)