IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 23RD SEPTEMBER 2011 / 1ST ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 20349 of 2011(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. MAHESH V.K., CHETTIARAMBATH HOUSE, PINARAYI P.O., THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT PIN - 670741. 2. SHINOY K.K., KUNDATHIL HOUSE, KIZHKKUM BHAGAM, PINARAYI P.O., THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670741. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.BABY SRI.A.N.SANTHOSH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, PAJOE TOWERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, TRIVANDRUM - 695014 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No. 20349/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL OF THE COLLEGE DATED 16.7.2011 TO THE 1ST PETITIONER EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL OF THE COLLEGE DATED 16.7.2011 TO THE 2ND PETITIONER EXT.P3 : COPY OF NOTIFICATION DATED 31.1.2009 ALONG WITH COVERING LETTER DATED 2.2.2009 EXT.P4 : COPY OF ONE SUCH JUDGMENT 15.3.2011 IN WRIT APPEAL NO.1638/2010 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE vps T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.20349 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioners were appointed as Peon-cum-Watchman on daily wages in the College of Applied Science, Pinarayi in Kannur District from 21.5.2010 and 13.7.2010 respectively. Their claim is for consideration of extension of their tenure in the light of Exhibit P4 judgment of this Court. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent submitted that this Court has only directed consideration of case of employees who have completed five years or more service as on 14.11.2006. 3. Evidently, the petitioners have not completed five years. Therefore, Exhibit P4 judgment relied upon by them is not applicable to them. Obviously, they were appointed for 179 days which is being extended from time to time. In that view of the matter no direction can be granted at this stage to consider the claim of the petitioners and the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn