f^?.. '^' Inaie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Dilio Raosaheb Deshmukh. J. i.A.fONo.l 587 of 2008 Ramavatar Shaima, Owner of Sharma Transport, Ram Nivas Talkies Road, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) 1, Ghasi Ram Si'o hleghnath Maitri, Aged about 32 years, Caste Mouwar: Occupation:Auto Driver, R/o Village Supa Tarai, Post Chiknipaii, Tahsil. Kartala, Distriot Korba (C.G.), Present resideni of Vitlage Bunga, Tahsi! and District Raigam (C.O.) 2. Sanjay Kumar Patel S/o Uday Ram Patel, Aged about 25 years, R/o Village Shalumuda, P.S. Tamnar, Tahsjl Gharghoda, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. The Manager, New India insurance Company, Sattigudi Chowk, Raigarh (C.G.) (Deleted) Memorandum of acpeal is.ider Section 173 ofthe Motor Vehictes Act, 1888. Present : - Shri R. R. Slnhs. counsei foftheaDpeiisnt. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 2"a day of December, 2008) Heard on admission. (2) The appsl!ant is aggrieved by the award dated 1 2-08-2008 passed by the 3rd Additional Motor Accidents Ciaims Tribunal, Raigarh (hencsforth •'•ths Tribunal") in Claim Case No.16 of 2007 whereby the Tribuna! has awarded compensation of Rs.37,450/- to the claimant for the damages caused to the Auto Riokshaw during the accldent (3) !t is not disputed by learned counsei for the appellant that the claimant was a third party. (4) The soie ground urgsd by learned counsel for the appellant in this appeai is that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is on the higher side. (5) Upon perusal of the impugned award, 1 am of the considered opinion that the Tribunal has afler considering the damages caused to the Auto Rickshaw of the ciaimant awarded just and reasonable compensafion. (6) There is no merit in this appeai which is aocordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. —- " Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge ^ urnane