IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2010 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 8446 of 2010(E) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ ANNIE, AGED 45 YEARS D/O.ANTHONY CHITTILAPPILLY HOUSE, CHITTILAPPILLY P.O, THRISSUR DT. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR SMT.P.A.ANITHA RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- THE ADAT GRAMA PANCHAYATH REP. BY ITS SECRETARY PANCHAYATH OFFICE, P.O.PORANATTUKARA, THRISSUR DT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.8446 OF 2010 (E) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he owns 9 cents of land in R.S. No.147/2 of Puzhakkal Village and that he made an application before the respondent for obtaining a building permit to construct a building. Finally respondent issued Ext.P5 informing that the petitioner has not produced the key plan. Petitioner submits that on receipt of the said letter, he submitted Ext.P6 key plan and that the same was not accepted by the Panchayat. It is with this grievance this writ petition is filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, in response to Ext.P5 he produced Ext.P6, that ought to have been accepted by the respondents and orders should have been passed on that basis. Having regard to the complaint that Ext.P6 is refused to be accepted, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to accept Ext.P6 and pass orders on the application made by the petitioner for building permit. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the submission of Ext.P6 and a copy of this judgment by the petitioner. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No.8446 /09 :2 :