IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29597 of 2009 1. SHUKHI DEVI 2. RANJU DEVI 3. MALTI DEVI 4. RANJIT SAO @ RANJIT KUMAR ----------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that differences are there of the complainant with her husband. She is residing separately from her husband and it appears that to fulfil illegal demand only to pressurise all the family members, they have been made accused. The marriage of the complainant was solemnised in the year 1996. Petitioner no.1 is mother-in-law, petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are Gotni and petitioner no.4 is brother-in-law of the complainant and they are apprehending their arrest. In the circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. The above named petitioners shall be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of - 2 - communication of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.D.Roy, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hilsa, Nalanda in Complaint Case No. 386 C of 2007, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI