-, ./ 8&9. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4886/2011 % AMARNATH NAGPAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr. N. Kinra, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rajiv Bansal & Mr. Rahul Bhandari, Advocates. 5103/2011 P.K.CHOUDHARY ..... Petitioner Through Mr. N. Kinra, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rajiv Bansal & Mr. Rahul Bhandari, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA ORDER 17.08.2011 The controversy involved in these cases is covered by the controversy in W.P. (C) No. 8765/2009. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to file an application for intervention in the said case to raise his grievance as well as assist the Court. Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:09.09.2024 16:54 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified With the aforesaid obseNation and liberty, the writ ) petitions stand disposed of. AUGUST 17, 2011 VKR .,-- CHIEF JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA, J.