COCP No.1840 of 2009 -: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1840 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: October 15, 2009. Satyawan Singh ...Petitioner(s) v. Shri Ajit M. Sharan ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri C.M. Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The grievance of the petitioner before this Court is that the respondents have failed to comply with the judgment dated 29.4.2009 whereby they were directed to finalize the seniority of the petitioner and decide the representation of the petitioner with regard to his claim to be appointed as Treasury Officer. Admittedly, the speaking order dated 13.7.2009 has been passed by the respondents on the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, as mentioned in para 4 of this contempt petition. However, for the reasons best known to the petitioner, the aforesaid order has not been placed on the record of this petition. At the asking of the court, Shri Chopra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, has produced a photocopy of the aforesaid order dated 13.7.2009. I have perused the aforesaid order. In this order, even the issue with regard to seniority was also considered by the respondents. It is not in dispute that the claim of the petitioner with regard to appointment against the post of Treasury Officer has also been rejected vide the aforesaid order dated 13.7.2009. Thus, the direction passed by this Court already stands COCP No.1840 of 2009 -: 2 :- complied with by the respondents by passing speaking order dated 13.7.2009. Thus, I find that the petitioner has withheld the material document from the knowledge of this court. In view of this, I find the present petition to be frivolous. Dismissed with costs of Rs.10,000/-. October 15, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge