1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2646 OF 2009 Vijay Ashok Jadhav .. Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondents. Mr.V.V.Purwant for the applicant. Mr.S.S.Pednekar A.P.P. for the State. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 25TH June, 2009 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.31 of 2009 of Salgar Wasti Police Station, District Solapur. The crime has been registered against the applicant for having allegedly committed an offence mainly punishable under section 376 of IPC. 3. I have perused the FIR. It appears that the prosecutrix and the applicant had sex on several occasions. According to the prosecution she allowed him to have sex with her because he had promised to marry her which he is now refusing and hence she filed the FIR. In my opinion, this is not a fit case to grant 2 anticipatory bail to the applicant. Hence the application is rejected. However, it is open to the applicant to surrender before the police and approach the appropriate court for regular bail. While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. Application is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)