FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1556 OF 2009 W I T H CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4155 OF 2009 [Joes Miranda V/S. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai] W I T H CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4319 OF 2009 (FOR INTERVENTION) IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1556 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 2150 OF 2006 (Mr.Cletus Gonsalves V/s. (1) Joes Miranda (2) The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai) ALONGWITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1557 OF 2009 W I T H CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4156 OF 2009 [Ashok Kumar Mulchand Bafna V/S. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai] W I T H CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4320 OF 2009 (FOR INTERVENTION) IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1557 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 2147 OF 2006 (Mr.Cletus Gonsalves V/s.(1) Mr.Ashok Kumar Chand Bafna (2) The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai) ALONGWITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 1558 OF 2009 W I T H CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4157 OF 2009 [Pannalal Bherulal Pamecha V/S. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai] W I TH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4321 OF 2009 (FOR INTERVENTION) IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1558 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO. 2150 OF 2006 (Mr.Cletus Gonsalves V/s. (1) Mr.Pannalal B.Pamecha (2) The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai) _____________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court s orders : ’ or directions and Registrar s’ : Court s or Judge s orders ’ ’ orders : _____________________________________________________________________________________ Mr.D.R.Shah i/by.R.O.Pathak & Associates, adv.for applicant. Mr.Z.Xavier, for BMC-respondent. Mr.Cletus Gonsalves-Intervenor in Intervention Applications. CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATED : 10TH NOVEMBER 2009. PC :- 1. After advancement of some arguments in the appeal, Mr.Shah seeks leave to withdraw the the above three First Appeals. On the application of Mr.Shah, the above First Appeal are allowed to be withdrawn. 2. One Mr.Cletus Gonsalves, the owner of the structures in question, states that he has filed the above three Civil Applications for intervening in the matter. In view of the withdrawal of the Appeal, the above Civil Applications taken out for Intervention do not survive. The same are accordingly disposed off. 3. With the disposal of the Appeals itself, Civil Applications taken out for injunction, also do not survive. The same also stand disposed off. (Judge)