CRLMB7555/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.7555/2010 Pushp Dayal Vs. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor Date of Order ::: 06.08.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Sanjay Gangwar for Shri Rohan Jain, Counsel for petitioner Shri Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor Shri G.S. Rathore, Counsel for complainant #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for complainant and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that the offence alleged against accused- petitioner is under Sections 136 of the Indian Electricity Act and maximum sentence provided for that offence is three years imprisonment and the matter is triable by a court of Magistrate; the petitioner would undertake not to indulge in such or any other offence in future. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for complainant JVVNL opposed the bail application. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I deem it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner, namely, Pushp Dayal Son of Gobri Lal on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in FIR No.153/2010, Police Station Baran Sadar, District Baran under Section 136 of the Indian Electricity Act, provided he CRLMB7555/2010 // 2 // furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sureties of Rs.15000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The bail application stands disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//