IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5139 of 2008 VIKAS SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 18 26.2.2009 The petitioner was granted bail on 24.3.2008 as there was no specific allegation of assault against him. It appears that though the prayer for bail was being made in Mufassil P.S.Case No.306/05 the case number was typed in para 1 and prayer portion of the petition as Mufassil P.S. Case No.206/05. The order was passed accordingly granting bail in respect of the police station case number as typed in para 1 and prayer portion of the petition. Subsequently it appeared that there has been some rubbing in the order passed on 24.3.2008 and an attempt has been made in order to make it appear as Mufassil P.S. Case No.306/05. The aforesaid fact was brought to the notice of the Court. On noticing the aforesaid fact this Court vide order dated 15.4.2008 observed that the order dated 9.4.2008 granting bail to the petitioner be kept in abeyance. Subsequently effort was made to trace out the counsel in question but in vain. A report was called for from the C.J.M., Begusarai in this regard. He reported that the petitioner is in custody. He further gave name of the counsel engaged by him. The petitioner is behind bar and it could not be ascertained as to who is responsible for rubbing in the order sheet. This Court does not find that any useful purpose would be served by proceeding in the matter any further. 2 As such the case is consigned. Anilksinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)