IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA/15228/2010 IN WP/8390/2010 PANDIT RAMKRUSHNA BADGUJAR AND ORS V/S VASUDEO RAJARAM WANI AND ORS ... Shri A.B.Girase, Advocate for applicants and Shri Girish V. Wani, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 7 and Shri V.G.Shelke, AGP for respondents 9, 10 & 14. ... CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI,J. Dated : April 15, 2011 PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and respondent Nos.1 to 7 so also learned AGP for respondents 9, 10 and 14. Other non applicants are not the respondents in the petition and hence the service of present application for intervention on them is dispensed with. 2. Shri Wani, learned Advocate has opposed the intervention by contending that ex-Chairman of the Cooperative Society responsible for all chaos is now trying to interfere through the intervenors. 3. The intervenors are also the persons who have deposited the amount with the society and therefore are interested in safeguarding their interests. Whether their arguments will assist this Court on merits of the petition or not, is the question not relevant at this stage. 2 CA/15228/2010 4. In the result, the application is granted. The applicants are permitted to intervene in the matter. Writ Petition be amended accordingly. Shri Girase, learned Advocate waives notice for intervenors, added as respondents in the Writ Petition. No order as to costs. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) ... akl