(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1018 OF 1991 WRIT PETITION NO. 1018 OF 1991 WRIT PETITION NO. 1018 OF 1991 Rayat Shikshan Sanstha ...Petitioner Versus Shri Popat Gajraj Doiphode ...Respondent ..... Mr. J.N. Shirdhonkar, counsel for Petitioner Mr. R.B. Nikam, counsel for Respondent. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 8TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 8TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 8TH FEBRUARY, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard Shri. Shirdhonkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner Sanstha. He has placed on record the consent terms signed by respective parties. The said consent terms are marked as "X" for identification. Shri. Popat Gajraj Doiphode, the respondent is present in person and Shri. R.B. Nikam represents the Sanstha. The consent terms do not vary the rights created in favour of the employee by the impugned decision of the School Tribunal at Pune. 2. Hence, the petition is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.