HIG (^UI^®PCUHAfyi"I'IS<3ARHft'RBIl.ASPUR Coram:- Hbh*l3ilieiSKfKDhirairi(lraSMislira& - Hon'Kle^l'iiJiSKIMSI'i.andRihifc^y I Wrifl^tic^fSliaoe54^MM^ Petitioner : ^ Smfe^Shams fi^ 36 yeai^;iW^Shrr~|^harHn^ad? ^ Rafjqiue F^ - Sh^ Ward N6, 4; ©aliNo; 2. Near Hciuse M Murti^^^^^^^^^^^^T^ Rajnandgaon (Q.G.) i ^ Vereus .;. • • ': - 1. Stete' ^yiCht'^sgarti^Through •-....''•^^^s'^^^ecreta^^D^jraftrnertt :::'-;';:''::,:,F&RGh^t!:^;;.,i.:^iand:;.'^ ;p^lopiment, @.^ , Mantra|a^,Raii^r(C.S.^^^^^^^ t:':l; l'/''i;% !.'"•; ;,: 2. Stete Council Jfor yEduegtkx'ial RqsearctTand;Tcaining^G@l:;EI3,t ThKMigh i^ @ Nagar,:Raipur^S.G.) 3. Chief Execuflve OIBeier Zjla ; Panchayat'Rajnandgac>n^^^ Respbndehts WTitRefiti6nundeTAE(i(ae22&6(theConstitirtjor»KaKlnclia Present: Siddharth Sttykla,(soynse'for thelpetitionec. ; < ShriUJSI.S.DTO.^o^.AdvocatefertheState. sOralQrder ^: •1 i .\ ;: •: • ;'';.-':a^.:: : 1:;''M;:; <Passedon20tl'September,2010) PeFDhireniclraMishra.J:- (1) BythiSpefitipn,<&iepe%nnerftas(^aHengedtiep^ c^qyalifjG^onasseedncl?divisiongi^uMoniforap p<^ of Stiiksha il^rmi (^ Ranchayat Shiksha^KaTO (Reemitmenfeanch|1cori^ Rulte,2007 as ultra^irus ofArticle 14 aml ^S^ffie (^n^itHUiM^i^ -!';:-. lndia!being'discriminative.''', •::.:;. -• ' .1 :! , .'• :: ''.; •'': :,' ^;;::i:': . (2) Leamed Counsel for the petjtioner submits that a buncR^ petitior haveatready'SeenSispos^oKIBythisiGoyrtiVides-^ -;A;::/~.':<)1s'.iJuly,;l2010-:.p^s^|:|iri|RaJ 'SHand^^ Ghhattegarh,'&,:othe^^a|j,<rtlte^.eonne(!ted^ challenge to the constitititionalyvalidity^^ '*^ Bi! been rejected. However, while dismissing the petition, th^ petitioners have been given opportunity to appraise their grievances by way of filling representation before ffie appropriate authonty of the State Government and respondentfState, in turn, has been directed to decide the representationrwithin three months from the^^^^d of productiorTofacopyoftheorderofthel-lighCourt.l-lefurthersubmits ' that this petition may also dispose of in similarterms. (3) The above prayer isnot opposed by learned counset for the State; (4) In that view OfUie matter, the instant petition isdisposed ofwith liberty to the peUtioner to file representation before ttie State ©ovemment apprising grievarices raised ^in this writ petition and if such representation is filed, the same shall be considered and proper ^decision shall be takenthereonas early as posisibte preferablywtttuna period Of three months from the date of prodyction of a eQpy'Of ithis order along with representat'ion., Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Vijay SdA 4 R.N. Chandrakar Judge it.jiniu*-"