ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 9260 OF PETITION NO. 9260 OF PETITION NO. 9260 OF 2004 2004 2004 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Petitioners. Vs. Smt.Vaishali Sudhakar Satbhai ...Respondent. Mr.D.A.Patil, AGP for the Petitioners. Mr.V.S.Talkute for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR & : P.B.MAJMUDAR & : P.B.MAJMUDAR & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 8th April, 2009 : 8th April, 2009 : 8th April, 2009 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- . At the time of hearing of this Petition, the learned counsel appearing for the parties have placed on record the copy of the consent terms. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the State has settled the dispute. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent submits that his client is also present in the Court and accepts the consent terms. The same is taken on record and marked as Exhibit "X" for identification. 2. In view of this, nothing further survives in this Petition. The parties to act on the consent terms. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of in view of consent terms. ( 2 ) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) V.MOHTA, J.) V.MOHTA, J.) (P.B.MAJMUDAR, (P.B.MAJMUDAR, (P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.) J.) J.)