AB 3190/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE. A.K.GOSWAMI Heard Mr. H.K. Barman, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K. Mu nir, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam. Mr. K. Munir has made available the case diary for perusal of this Court. I have perused the same. Mr. Barman has drawn the attention of this Court to the Judgment dated 8-9-2011 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Kamrup annulling the marria ge solemnised between the parties under Section 25(i) of Special Marriage Act, 1 954. The ejahar came to be filed by the informant on 10-9-2011 i.e. 2 days after the marriage was annulled by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Guwahat i. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on consideration of the mat erials available in the case diary as well as the application for bail including the Annexures appended thereto, this Court is of the opinion that the prayer fo r pre-arrest bail may be favourably considered. Accordingly, the interim protection granted to the petitioner Nos. 2,3 & 4, name ly, Sri Atul Kalita, Smt. Runu Kalita and Smt. Rebati Kalita, respectively is he reby made absolute. The petitioner No.1, namely, Sri Hemen Barman is also given the benefit of pre-a rrest bail by this order. Accordingly, it is provided that in the event of the arrest of the petitioners, namely, Sri Hemen Barman, Sri Atul Kalita, Smt. Runu Kalita and Smt. Rebati K alita, respectively, in connection with Chandmari PS Case No. 460/2011 u nder Section 498(A) IPC, they shall be released on bail of Rs. 15,000/- each wit h one local surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. Bail application stands disposed of.