IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11557 of 2009 LAKSHMI NARAIN SAH, son of Late Bhagawat Sah, resident of Village Bahadurpur Patori, P.S. Patori, District Samastipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. The D.M., Samastipur. 3. The D.S.E., Samastipur. 4. The D.P.F.O., Samastipur. 5. The A.G., Bihar, Patna. ---Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr Dhananjay Mishra, Advocate For the S t at e : A.C. to G.P. 9 For Respondent no.5: Mr. Vivekanand Kumar, Advocate --------------- 2. 4.9.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also the Accountant General. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the payment of the retiral dues as indicated in paragraph 2 of the writ application. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, as raised in the writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the District Superintendent of Education, Samastipur (respondent no.3). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the respondent no.3 shall consider the grievances of the petitioner with regard to the payment of retiral dues as raised in his representation and 2 dispose it of in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the pending claims of the petitioner could be settled without delay. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)