IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.8277 of 2006 Between: S.V.R.Electricals Pvt.Ltd., rep., by its Managing Director Sri M.Venkateswara Rao, s/o late M.Narayana Rao, r/o Flat No.E2, Kakatiya Mansion, 5th Line, Brundavan Gardens, Guntur-6. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, a Government Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, having its office at 5-9-58/V,6th Floor Parishram Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-20 rep., by its Chairman and Managing Director. 2 The APIIC Ltd., Zonal Office, Industrial Estate, Vijayawada rep., by its Zonal Manager 3 K.Simhadri Reddy, s/o Remireddy, r/o Ankireddypalem (V), Guntur Mandal and Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent canceling the allotment under impugned order L.R.No.25 to 27/B1.42/IDA/GNT dt.31-03-2006 as illegal, intentional, arbitrary, malafide, lack of authority and jurisdiction and consequently set aside the same as illegal, in the interest of justice, and pass such other and further orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MS. K.PALLAVI FOR MR.K.V.BHANU PRASAD The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent cancelling the allotment under impugned order L.R.No.25 to 27/B1.42/IDA/GNT dt.31-03-2006 as illegal, intentional, arbitrary, mala fide, lack of authority and jurisdiction and consequently set aside the same as illegal.” At the hearing, Ms. K.Pallavi, learned counsel representing Sri K.V.Bhanu Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition in terms of letter, dated 24.07.2009 addressed to the Registry. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, interim order, dated 24.04.2006 is vacated and WPMP.No.10578 of 2006 is dismissed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 29th JULY, 2009. kvni