IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 19184 of 2007 Between: M/s. M. Supriya, D/o. M. Subba Rao, R/o. Jakkavari Street, Perala, Chirala, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of A.P. Rep by its Principle Secretary, Health, Medical & Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Krishna District, rep by its Vice-Chancellor and Chairman of Selection Committee for admission into MBBS Couse 3 The Commissioner for Disabled Welfare, (Competent Authority under the Persons with disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation) Act, 1995) Chandra Vihar, M.J. Road, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of Respondents particularly the IInd Respondent herein rejecting the action of Respondents particularly the IInd Respondent herein in rejecting the claim of the petitioner herein for admission into MBBS Course for the academic year 2007-2008 under PH category vide Memo No. 4180/MBBS/BDS/PH/2007, dated 20-8-2007 as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the statutory rules framed by the 1stRespondent and also contrary to the provisions of Act 1 of 1996 and the rules made there under and consequentially direct Respondents to provide a seat to the petitioner udner the quota meant for physically handicapped for admission into MBBS Course for the academic year 2007-2008 as per her rank and entitlement and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.G.K.PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FAMI.WELFARE The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 19184 OF 2007 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ____________ (G. ROHINI, J.) 30.04.2009 Stp ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1) 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RLD}