IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3987 of 2008 RAKESH KUMAR S/O LATE BIRENDRA NARAIN VERMA --- PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. UDAY PRAKASH SINGH --- OPP. PARTIES. For the Petitioner : Mr. Naresh Dixit, Advocate. For the O.P.No.2 : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Das, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ----------- 04 06.10.2010 Petitioner is the complainant. He seeks cancellation of anticipatory bail granted in favour of opposite party no.2 by learned Sessions Judge vide order dated 19.04.2007, passed in A.B.P.No. 822 of 2007 (Uday Prakash Singh vs. State). It is contended that a wrong statement was made before the Court below that the cheque bounced because of the instruction issued by the accused. It is contended that the cheque had bounced due to insufficient fund. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no.2 submits that there is no allegation of misuse of privilege of bail granted by learned Sessions Judge on 19.04.2007. I have perused the order dated 19.04.2007. Learned Sessions Judge has assigned adequate reasons for granting anticipatory bail. No case for cancellation of anticipatory bail has been made out. Application is dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)