WWW WW§WW %Wm€¥r (Single Bench; Hon‘ble Mr. Jusfice Dhirendra Mishra) W.P. l :| No.6382/O7 l arke’r New Delhi Present Mr Rakesh Pandey Adv for he pe’rmoner Mr Arun Sao Govf Advocaf for The Sfafe of Chhaf’rlsgarh Mr Ashlsh Shrlvasfava Adv ca’re for responden’r No 3 WWWW MOéW/W m 20o mmvmw’) (Pefifion U/A 226 of Consfifu’rion of India) Peh‘fioner P.D. AgarwaL S/o Shri Maluram, aged abouf 44 ‘ years Occupafion Depo’r Manager (W ks) Head Office Technical Departmem‘ (car sec‘non) HablbganJ Bhopa! MP Vs Responden'rs 1. he S’rafe of ChhaHuSQarh Through Chief ecrefary, D KS Bhawan Ralpur (CG) 2. he Sfm‘e of Madhya Pradesh Through huef Sevrefary Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal 3. hha‘r’risgarh Sfm‘e Rood Tronspom‘ orporm‘ion, Through ’rhe Divisional anoger, Chho‘h‘isgarh Infrosfrucfure evelopmen’r CorporoTion, Raipur, C.G. 4. adhya Prodesh S’rofe Road Tronspor‘r orpora‘rion, Through The Divisiona! onoger, Habibganj, Bhopal, M.P. 5. nion of India, Through The Secre’rary, inis‘rr‘y of Personnel Public Grievances nd Pension (Sfa‘re Reorganiza‘lion Cell) By The ins’ram‘ pefi'r'on The pefh‘ioner has prayed for quashing of fhe order of A nexure P-1 da’red 6.1.2003 whereby respondent No.3 has no’r ac epfed joining of fhe pefih‘oner and fur‘rher prayed for direc‘rion o respondents No.1 & 3 fo permi’r The peTiTioner ’ro join under re pondenf No.3 in pursuance of final allocation Iisf and order da’re 31.12.2002. Learned counsel for The pe’rifioner submifs Tha’r he is nof pressing fhis pefi‘rion of this tage, however, in view of pleadings of respondent No.3-CSIDC in ara-é of its additional return, he submits that the petitione may be permitted to make fresh representation before th concerned department of the Government of Chhattisgarhg for allowing the petitioner to join under respondent No.3 in \1iiew of the provisional allocation of services of the petitioner to fhe State of Chhattisgarh and in turn, the concerned authority e directed to decide the same expeditiously. Mr. Sao, learned Gove nment Advocate appearing on behalf of State of Chhattisgarh sub its that if the petitioner files fresh representation before the co cerned authority of respondent No 1, ”was“ ova-m . _ mm “420$?" ' WWQaigw‘ga) MWW WW§wW amsné-‘am mafsam ’ ZK #WW 13.01.2009 Heard. W mm (mgr) ._’;:5L mmfw’ax 3947mm mwm WW WW %aif%rqanéw The same shall be considered and decided wi‘rhin a period of ’rhr'ee monfhs' from The doi‘e of rec ip’r of represenfafion. In view of The above fhis pefi’rion is disposed of with a direc’rion fo The peTiTioner T make deTaiied represenToTion wiThin Ten days from Today, along wi h cerTified copy of This order, before The concerned auThoriTy of espondenT No.1 herein, raising ail his grievance, raiSed in This pe iTion. On such represenTaTion being made, concerned auThoriTy o respondenT No.1 is direcTed To decide , The same in accordance wiThi iaw wiThin a period of Three monThs from The daTe of receipT of T Sd/— { Dhirendra Mishra Judge CerTified copy as per r he represenTaTion. ’ Jles. mm m zoo