1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 161 OF 2008 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 206 OF 2008 IN M.J. PETITON NO. C-234 OF 2001 Vijay Pahlaj Rajani ...Appellant Versus Neelam Vijay Rajani & Anr. ...Respondents Mrs. Anita A. Agarwal with Mr. Jay Bhatia for the Appellant Mr. S.S. Gokhale for Respondents No. 1 and 2. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and S.A. BOBDE, JJ. DATE: NOVEMBER 6, 2009 P.C.:- Both learned counsel submit that this appeal has almost become infructuous, as, after this appeal was filed, a compromise was reached between the parties, and by consent, a decree of divorce is already obtained. The quantum of 2 maintenance is also settled between the parties. But the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, Mr. Bhatia, insists that the case should be adjourned, to enable him to obtain the copy of the decree of divorce. 2. We do not understand how the obtaining of a copy of the decree of divorce changes the course of decision in this case. This appeal is accordingly dismissed. Consequently, the Civil Application also stands disposed of. 3. The deposited amount is allowed to be withdrawn by the respondents after two weeks, as, even according to the appellant, that amount is part of the full and final settlement between the parties. BILAL NAZKI, J. S.A. BOBDE, J.