BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Eighth day of June Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.S.RAMANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.6611 of 2011 1 PON. TAMIL SELVAN 2 P.RAVEENDRAN @ POOVIARASAN 3 R.PARVATHI 4 R.VIMAL KUMAR 5 C.USHA DEVI, 6 A.CHANDRASEKARAN ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 6 Vs STATE REP THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TALLAKULAM, MADURAI. CRIME NO.13/11 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.C. VAKEESWARAN Advocate For Respondent :Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offencees under Sections 498 (A), 406, 506(I) I.P.C. in Crime No.13 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the first petitioner is the husband and the petitioners 2 to 6 are the in-laws of the de-facto complainant and the first petitioner is aged about 49 years and the marriage took place between them on 22.11.2009 and the de-facto complainant is aged about 40 years. He further submitted that the matter may also be referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre and anticipatory bail for the petitioners 2 t0 6 may be considered. 3.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioners demanded dowry of 25 sovereign gold and two lakhs from the de-facto complainant and therefore, the case was registered. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that petitioners 2 to 6 are in-laws and allegations are made against the first petitioner, , this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners 2 to 6. Accordingly, the petitioners 2 to 6 are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 5.The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. 6.As the matter is matrimonial one, the anticipatory bail in respect of first petitioner is referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre, attached to this Bench and the Mediation Centre is directed to issue notice to the de-facto complainant and tried immediately and submitted a report to the Court on or before 27.6.2011 . Post on 28.6.2011 sd/- 08/06/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I MADURAI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT 3.THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION CENTRE, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 5.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TALLAKULAM, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.C. VAKEESWARAN Advocate SR.No.17453 rl/7c – 10.6.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.6611 of 2011 Date :08/06/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/