IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Rev. No.144 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 23, 2010 STATE OF PUNJAB ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS PARAMJIT KAUR & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. SS Khaira, Advocate, for respondents. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) For the reasons recorded in order of even date passed in Criminal Revision No.332 of 2009 (Tej Kaur vs. State of Punjab and others), this petition is allowed. Order passed by the revisional court below is set aside to the extent it directs stay of proceedings before the trial court, till the decision of the civil suit. Resultantly, the trial court is directed to proceed with the trial of the accused expeditiously, in view of the delay already caused. February 23, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?