IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33269 of 2010 PINKU YADAV @ SHASHI BHUSHAN PRASAD, SON OF BIRANCHI YADAV @ JAGAT NARAYAN PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NANDLALPUR, P.S. MUFFASIL, DISTRICT MUNGER. ---- PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----- OPPOISTE PARTY ----------- 2 12.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The allegation in the First Information Report is that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons fired indiscriminately on the informant. The shot fired by Sanjay is said to have hit the informant’s brother. The seizure list mentions that 12 empty cartridges of 12 bore and 6 empty cartridges of 8 m.m. were found at the place of occurrence. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no injury on any one except the informant’s brother and as such petitioner is only the member of the mob. The fact that cartridges were found on the spot does not inspire me to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. This application is dismissed. However, submissions made on behalf of the petitioner are good grounds for grant of regular bail. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)