FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7970 OF 2011 "Nita w/o. Bhagwan Ware Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. Anil M. Gaikwad, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondent Nos. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 12TH OCTOBER, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent of parties. The petitioner, who is the wife of deceased Bhagwan Ware, who was working as Librarian, is challenging the order dated 15th January, 2011, issued by the respondent No.4, thereby withdrawing the approval given to the deceased husband of the petitioner in the scale of a Trained-Graduate Teacher. 2] In a bunch of writ petitions, including W.P. No. 177/2011 and 2960/2011, we have held that in view of the judgment of the Division Bench of this court in the case of " Shobhu Shankar Chavan vs. Head Master, Maharashtra Vidyalaya, Dist, Solapur" in W.P. No. 5938/1998, dated 17th September, FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7970 OF 2011 "Nita w/o. Bhagwan Ware Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others." Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 1998, the Librarians possessing a degree of Bachelor in Library Science are entitled to get revised pay scale, as specified in the Govt. Resolution dated 1st October, 1988. 2] In that view of the matter, we find that the impugned communication is not sustainable in law. The petitioner's husband was entitled to revised pay scale, as per the rules of 1988 alongwith all consequential benefits. Rule is, therefore, made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (B) and (C), with no orders as to costs. [M.T. JOSHI,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/-