HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.183 of 2011 Date: March 25, 2011 Between: Kalaganda Krishna Murthy, S/o.late Lakshmaiah, aged about 70 years, R/o.Balumuruvari lane, Venkatagiri Town and Mandal, SPSR Nellore District … Petitioner And Velugoti Bhaskara Sai Krishan Yachendra, S/o.late VVRK Yachendra, Aged about 60 years, R/o.Raja Street, Venkatagiri Town, Nellore District … Respondent Order: Heard Sri P.Gangarami Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt.S.Nanda, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. In this civil revision petition, filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, petitioner has questioned docket order dated 18-01-2011 passed, in E.P.No.2 of 2011 in R.C.C.No.3 of 2005, by the learned Rent Controller-cum-Junior Civil Judge, Venkatagiri, Nellore District. Petitioner is a tenant of the respondent herein. Respondent-landlord filed eviction petition in R.C.C.No.3 of 2005, which was allowed. To enforce the eviction order, E.P.No.2 of 2011 was filed and the Court below, by order dated 18-01-2011, ordered delivery of possession. When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the respondent has placed before this Court a copy of the proceedings drafted by the Field Assistant of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Venkatagiri recording delivery of possession on 20-01-2011 pursuant to the order passed by the Rent Controller on 18-01-2011 in E.P.No.2 of 2011. From the record, it is clear that consequent to delivery of possession, the shop in question has been let out to a third party. Although it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that an appeal is filed and is pending, but, in view of the fact that possession was already delivered pursuant to the order of the court below dated 18-01-2011 in E.P.No.2 of 2011, I do not find any ground to interfere with the said order. As there is no interim order in the appeal filed, there was no impediment for passing of order in E.P.No.2 of 2011. For the aforesaid reasons, civil revision petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J March 25, 2011 MRR