The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition Nos.7332, 7337 and 7359 of 2010 Dated 1st April, 2010 WP.No.7332 of 2010 Between: Sri Alapati Venu …Petitioner And 1.The Managing Director, APSRTC, Musheerabad, RTC X Road, Hyderabad and 2 others. …Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.Bethi Venkateswarlu Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.Sridhar Reddy Pottigari, SC for APSRTC The Court made the following: Order: In these three Writ Petitions, the petitioner, who is a licensee for selling items such as popcorn, sweets etc., and running telephone booth, alleged undue interference with his businesses by the respondents. At the hearing, Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for APSRTC representing the respondents, on instructions, stated that as the petitioner is the licensee of three stalls, the respondents have no reason to interfere with his lawful businesses and that if the petitioner is running the businesses in violation of the terms of the licenses, appropriate action will be taken against him only after following the due process of law, namely; by issuing show cause notice and considering the explanation, if any, filed by him. In view of this submission of the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, the Writ Petitions are disposed of with the direction to the respondents not to interfere with the lawful businesses of the petitioner without following due process of law. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petitions, WPMP.Nos.9464, 9469 and 9494 of 2010, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, are disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 1st April, 2010 lur