2. cr appa 1034-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1034 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1092 OF 2008 Mehboob Muktar Ansari .. Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Ms. Indrayani Koparkar for the Applicant Ms. M.M. Deshmukh, APP for the State CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 16th SEPTEMBER,2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State. 2. By order dated 23rd October 2008, the applicant came to be granted bail in the sum of Rs. 5000/- with one or two sureties. The applicant has preferred this application through jail praying therein that instead of surety, he be released on cash bail of Rs. 5000/-. 3. Learned APP states that the applicant is involved in a case under Section 307 of IPC. He has been sentenced 10 years of imprisonment. She submitted that looking to the nature of 1 2. cr appa 1034-10.doc injuries and the evidence on record, it is not a fit case to release the applicant on cash bail. 4. Looking to the above facts, I am not inclined to release the applicant on cash bail, however, I am inclined to reduce the amount of surety from Rs. 5000/- to Rs. 2000/-. 5. The application is allowed in above terms. 6. The order dated 23rd October 2008 is modified accordingly. 7. The order be communicated to the applicant who is in jail. 8. Office to pay fees to the appointed advocate as per rules. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2 2. cr appa 1034-10.doc 3