IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL WRIT No. 2449 of 2009 KISHAN LAL V/S PRESIDENT, NAGAR PALIKA PHALODI &ORS Mr. MS GODARA, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 4.9.2009 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The reference was made to the effect, as to whether the removal of the workman w.e.f. 17.9.1990 is valid and proper or not. The learned Labour Court has found that the workman in his cross-examination has admitted that he was removed in 1994-92, thus, in my opinion, it cannot be said that the workman has established to have been removed in 1990, rather he claims to have worked till the subsequent period, as such, the reference could not be answered in favour of the workman. Then the learned Labour Court has found that the workman has failed to establish to have worked for more than 240 days during 12 calendar months, apart from the fact that the proceedings were initiated belatedly. In my view, there is no error in the impugned order requiring interference in writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed summarily. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/