IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26311 of 2010 BABLU YADAV @ BABLU KUMAR YADAV, son of Hari Yadav, resident of village Israin, P.S. Kumarkhand, District Madhepura Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 5.10.2010 Having heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State as also taking into account that not only the name of the petitioner has been emerged in the confessional statement of the co-accused but even a person, namely, Ram Ballav Rai whose motorcycle was snatched had also identified and named the petitioner, this Court considering the gravity of the offence under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. In the criminal antecedent report received from the office of the Superintendent of Police there is no clear indication as with regard to criminal antecedent of the petitioner and therefore, if the petitioner after completing his period of judicial custody of further one year from today would move the court below, the court below will first make verification of the criminal antecedent of the petitioner 2 and thereafter it will reconsider the prayer for bail of the petitioner on merits. With the aforementioned observation, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/