IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11811 of 2007 Shyama Kumari, Wife of Vivekanand Prasad @ Vivekanand Sah, Resident of Village & P.O. Nayaganj, Gram Panchayat- Nayagaon Western, Via-Mahnar, P.S. Desari, Block-Sahdei Bujurg, District Vaishali at Hajipur. -------- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Govt. of Bihar at New Secretariate, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. 3. The District Welfare Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Civil), Mahnar, P.S. Desari, District Vaishali at Hajipur. 5. The Block Development Officer, Block-Sahdei-Bujurg, P.S. Desari, District Vaishali at Hajipur. 6. The Child Development Project Officer, Block-Sahdei-Bujurg, P.S. Desari, District Vaishali at Hajipur. 7. The Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat, Nayagaon Western, P.S. Desari, District Vaishali at Hajipur. 8. The Secretary of Gram-Panchayat-Nayagaon Western, P.S. Desari, District Vaishali at Hajipur. 9. Kumari Usha Rani, Wife of Shri Jyotish Kumar, Resident of Village & P.O. Nayaganj, Gram-Panchayat, Nayagaon Western, P.S. Desari, District Vaishali at Hajipur. -------- Respondents ----------- 2 17.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “1. That this application is for issuance of appropriate Writ/Order/Direction to direct the respondent authority to select the petitioner on the post „Sevika‟ Anganbari Centre No.51 named as Jagat Narayan Chourasiya Centre at Nayaganj in Ward No.15 under Gram Panchayat Nayagaon Western, Block- Sahdei, Bujurg, District-Vaishali at Hajipur. 2 In view of the fact that the petitioner is the maximum marks holder in Intermediate of Science and absolutely fit on the basis of other required criteria such as annual income etc but the respondent no.7 (Mukhiya) and others have not considered the matter due to oblique reason and ulterior motive.” Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, would accept the position that the petitioner has not moved the prescribed authority, namely, the respondent no.2, the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Vaishali. That being so, this writ application is permitted to be withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to file a compact representation in the subject matter of this writ application before the respondent no.2, who, then after hearing the petitioner and respondent no.9 as also the representative of the concerned Gram Panchayat, will pass order within the time frame fixed by the State Government in its recent Circular dated 10.12.2009. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)