BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Seventh day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.12408 of 2011 1 RAMAKRISHNAN 2 MOHAN 3 MURUGAN 4 SAKTHIVEL S/O.NARAYANAN 5 KARUPPUSAMY 6 SAKTHIVEL S/O.KARUPPUSAMY 7 NARAYANAN S/O.ARUNACHALAM 8 IRULAYEE 9 PETCHI 10 GANESAN 11 NARAYANAN S/O.RAMAN 12 RAMAN 13 THIRUMURUGAN .. PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO. 1 TO 13 Vs 1 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAIYANUR POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.69/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.SARAVANAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) For Intervenor : M/S.R.UDHAYAKUMAR, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. in Crime No.69 of 2011, seek anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Heard Mr.M.Saravanakumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Mr.R.Udhayakumar, the learned counsel appearing for the intervenor as well as Mr.A.Ramar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent State. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the intervenor submits that the fifth and the eleventh petitioners have already been arrested. Hence, the application as regards the fifth and the eleventh petitioners may be dismissed. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have nothing to do with the alleged offence as stated in the complaint. He would further submit that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners 1 to 4, 6 to 10 and 11 and 12. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. 7. The application as regards the fifth and the eleventh petitioners is dismissed. Sd/- 27/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAMADURAI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTATE, SIVAGANGAI 3 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAIYANUR POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S. M.SARAVANAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.33220 +1. CC to M/S. R.UDHAYAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.3372433220 ssk/28.09.2011 /7c -2p/- ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12408 of 2011 Date :27/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/