^ 1 <~vsi<y ^ <n*i<pii ti»*<i<=n ^sr'^irai^ra, (siTTl+ris, [s«'ii+<i< ;c^yuo.5^s(/fi% "W1200 u p sn^r T??? ('j?^'"*,8') an^i qrt 1<-< wn an^i aiiiti jy-- t^IIW^fcl 311^1 PETITIONER Ashok Kit Son of I.E.M. Sd (CG) Vdrsus RESPONDENTS 1. 2. 3. State of Departm^ Mantralal The Dis District-K I.E.M. Sc Collieiy Distt.-Koi Writ Petition U/A226/2271 S.B. HON'BLESHRI DHIRENDR^ 29.09.2008 Shri R.K. Jaiswal, counsel Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel La Heard. With the consent of the By this petition, the petiti Teacher in I.E.M. Primary Scho claiming the benefits of 5th P£ counterparts in the Govemment <(ii<<i?)<ii-( tiiicif 4 fr^ <rfl«(i< i?3iRm sii^i marYadava, aged about 38 years, •ateShri Ramdhani.Resident of hool, Jhagrakhand, Dista-ict Korea Shhattisgarh, through -Secretary, •nt of School Education, ^a, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) trict Education Officer, Korea, lorea, C.G. l-iool, through - Headmaster-Singhi iducation Society, Jhagarakhand, ;a (CG) The Direc|tor, Directorate, Public Institution, Pension I}ada,Raipur (CG) of the CoMstltUtion of India \. MISHRA. J, \>r the petitioner. bvyer for the State. partjies tjies, the matter is heard finally. jner, who is working as Assistant jl, Jhagrakhand, District-Korea is ^ Commission at par with their pchools. The 5th Pay Commission_ •SVSSV SI*T gaTIOT. •wri.TTR —FS/I97-3/2008 -40,000. ^y's^ ,iii>», -% I !ta,.. '^Vf^if Pathak J^- ^tTHCTI a»*<l'W •yss •^w\v\^, ^Ti1yii<o, rs«'iwi< '^'^C's3H^"S^^^2 "Wl 200 sn^i -q^r (iq{3»i<t4) <«il<llt'l<fl-lWRlf ^ teTzt ^«<i< i?3ifii»TOTi?T an^i'^lftFim wi sn^i ii>*< wnm'aftaa^i was to be granted with effect fr^m. 1.1.1996 in accordance with the Madhya Pradesh Revision of Pay| This Court by the judgme case ofSmt. A LaUVs. State ol Rules, 1998. nt and order dated 6.2.2007 in the Chhattisgarli and other connected matters fW.P. No.4108 of 2005)| held that the teachers working in Government aided schools dre entitled for the benefit of recommendations of the 5th Pay|Commission. After the decision of this Court, the petidoner has| filed this petition on 24.9.2008 claiming the same relief. | Learned counsel appearin^ for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made representatjon on 2.8.2008 (Annexure P-2) to the respondents authorities, whic|h was not considered at all. In view of the fact that th^ representation of the petitioner is pending consideradori before au^hority concemed, the respondents authorities are accordingly direct:ed to consider his representation dated 2.8.2008 (Annexure P-2) ijending before respondent No.l in accordance with law, on its own 4tierits, in the light oUhe judgment [ay this Court in the mafter ofSint. and order dated 6.2.2007 passed ALall (Supra). The petition is accordingly d isposed of. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge IHFto .NN gCTm, '.T W -FS/I97-3/2008 -40,000.