r-i ^ il &^AJ( f~^>V •uugr." —"LS!; ,- -'•ri^.-^y-wpw '-"^d / /3E^2X—puo ,'.J-"^ ~S-^AAJI ///^^£-^<^ x l^ltehBijK^ >l?+to]> p'sl t; P^lh l-|fc.U]blU> usjft >ii!ii»aikyic S3u8aBjto|, ^.^[^^ D2JB lb!h<li lft9h> ibll.b] life.B^UB 4<?/^^-^'oj^(v ^ C,J 9 -u^- lUitlh ^> 3 v^1 ~w^'^WW°S'^^ ^c<£]^^ 'f^^. ^ >Ti^l}ais] 'siift[iie 'bwih>!h»te£. ~Tj^/€y~^^f^^~^^^^~~^^F~^~o~y ^f^ .^C^- J-Q, <^S^J!S^->^ -^- ^o^tv^/^^ / ^ °D ZZ-3H-IX 4 \ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Single Bench: Mr. G. Minhajuddin, J) M.C.C.No. 821 of 2011 29th November, 2011: 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 27th July,,2011 passed in M.A.(c) No. 1387/2009, had allowed the appeal in part, set aside the impugned award dated 31 August, 2009, passed by Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur in Claim Case No.29/09, whereby liabillty to pay compensation has been fastened upon the insurance company, and remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for reconsideration and decision afresh expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of the order. 3. However, vide request letter dated 2.11.2011, learned Tribunal has prayed for extension of further time of three months for deciding the above claim case as, for the reasons mentioned in the request letter, it is not possible to decide the claim case within the stipulated period ofthree months, as directed. 4. It is pertinent to mention here that though this Court, while remitting the matter back to the Tribunal, had directed the Tribunal for deciding the claim case expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of the order, however, the said direction was not mandatory and therefore, the word "preferably" was used. ' 1 5. In view of the above, on due consideratron of the reasons mentioned iri the request letter dated 2.11.2011 ofthe Tribunal, the MCC is allowed and the -Tribunal is granted further time of three months from the ^late of receipt of copy of this order to decide the Claim Case No.29/09 in the light of observations made in order dated 27 July, 2011 passed in M.A.(c) No. 1387/2009. Sd/- G. Minhajuddin Judge I /</