1 S.B.CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 843/1999 (Jagdish Vs. Smt.Kamla & Ors.) DATE OF ORDER: 07.03.2007 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.Arjun Purohit, for the petitioner BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned judgment dated 27th August, 1999, whereby the application filed by non-petitioner No.1 Smt.Kamla W/o Jagdish was partly allowed and the learned Judge, Family Court passed an order for maintenance of Rs.500/- to the non-petitioners No.2 & 3 the daughters of non-petitioner No.1 and denied maintenance to non-petitioner No.1 Kamla. Against this order, this revision petition has been filed. I have perused the impugned order. I see no ground for interference in the order passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Jodhpur. The finding arrived at by the learned Family Court is not illegal nor perverse. Therefore, I am not inclined to interfere in the order impugned. The petition stands dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS) J. BKS/-