IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.NO. ©aS/2004 PET ITIONER A; ^N: TIWARI ^y ^- /' .• RESIPONDENTS ^.•^) S/0 SHRI NANDLAL TIWARI, ,\(.^v'" AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS/ ^v'°j:?SJ".'Lir\- R/o- AMANDON BLOCK, ? L-' O / PRATAPPUR, TAHSIL PRATAI ,..-->^~' ><'.^ ^T" PRATAPPUR, 1] 2] 3] 4] DISTT. SURGUJA (C.G.) VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH: SECRETARY TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR (C.G.) COMMISSIONER/ TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT/ RAIPUR, DISTT. RAIPUR (C.G.) ASST. COMMISSIONER, TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SURGUJA, DISTT. SURGUJA (C.G.) DY. DIRECTOR, TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, RAIPUR, DISTT. RAIPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 216/2270F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA T XI-HC-22 ^n^r'^i S^'ti<=h ^§¥1 ^3SW "^f^l ^^? '^IFIM^, "^^<s<o, I^TPay ^W^T^NI^b ani^r TI^ ^.te.,..e..ls...6..:..S.^4^ •^^ar' ^3?1^T'^fI^T ^H 21704/2004 Shri Maaoj ParaiijpeJ Shri Akhil Agi-awal, on advaQ.ee copy. I.A.No. 1848/2004foii Heard. Learaed counsel for counsel for the petitioner. P^ael Lawyer for fhe State/respondent no. 1 urgent hearing is allowed. He further subraits fhat fo: aa opporfunity of filing conipetent its owu m.erits to. accordaiic< Haviag considered DJierits of the case, in fhe o^ ser^ed if a direction is gi^ representation raisiag auth.ority/respondent no,2 order, witliio. a jiiouth, aa4 coinpetent authority/ respoijident '^pfe^T 'RR^f ^ fe^t <F^^K ^ 3?f^F? ^TI^T ^he petitioner subniits that the petitioner has uot been considered f^r prociotion to the post of Head Master. the present fhe petitioner niay be given tfae detalled representation before fhe authority/respo4<ient no.2, which shall be considered on wifh. law. add wifhout expressin^g aay opiiiion on the |iaion of fhis Court, eiids ofjustice wiU be |en to the petitioner to make a detailed grievaaces before the competent ^long wifh a copy of tlie petition aiid tiiis on such representation being filed, tlie no,2 shall decide fhe saaie on its hls [Tft^^fe^ •I?/ XI-HC-22 ^^ ^w^i^, w^J^, T^w^y. 3:[?^T^T f^ii^'sn^ ^RTO ^rf^i 3TT^T 1c?5T^ WH^T^W^ •M 200 •^^sr' ^[I^T "^ITSJT ^rft^ -. ^" own nierits iii accordaiic^ within fhree xaontb.s froin is aiade clear fhat if aiiy ^rievance stiU subsists, fhe petitiouer niay avail fhe reinedv available 1 of. With the aforesaid c| Consequentiy, I.A.Nd '^RfepfrT THTRff "4 fe^t iFsi^K '^3rf^F?3:n^r with law as early as posslble preferably Jie date of receipt of fhe representation. It inder fhe law. bservations, fhis petition staiids disposed .1849/2004 also staads disposed of Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge