IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 5406 of 2007 Between: 1 Vaddera Labour Contract Cooperative Society Ltd., Narayangri Village, Dharmasagar Mandal, Warangal Rep. by its President Bontha Lingaiah 2 Sri Alakunta Yellaiah (Waddera Caste) Contrctor, 2-381, Madikonda VIllage, Hanamkonda, Warangal. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Executive Engineer (R & B) NH Division, Warangal. 2 Siddartha Constructions, Rep. by its MD., Surender Babu 1-8-865, PRakashnagar, Begumpet, Hyderabad. 3 Venkateswasra Constructions, Rep. by its Managing Partment, Ravindera Reddy S/o. Balasamudram, Warangal. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of cancelling the work allotted and entered into agreement with the petitioners dt. 12-2-2007 without issuing any notice nor given opportinity of giving explanation and without any reasons by violating under conditions and standard specifications or rules and regulations and illegal, arbitrary and violatives or principles of natural justice under art. 14,19 and 21 of the constitution of India consequently direct the respondents not to ancel or renotify or finalise the works by which were entered into agreement between petitioners and respondent on 12-2-2007 by allaowing the petitioners to execute the works and pay the bills without any dely. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.KOONA REDDY ANJI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO.5406 OF 2007 ORAL ORDER There being no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 02.06.2009, the matter is directed to be listed today for dismissal. When the matter is called today there is no representation on behalf of the writ petitioners. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for default. No order as to costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 4th JUNE 2009 *TSNR