IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH JULY 2008 / 25TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 3160 of 2008(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- JERRY VARGHESE, POOPPALLIL, CHANGAM, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, CHERIAN P.VARGHESE, DO. DO. BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, KOCHI CORPORATION, KOCHI. 2. THE REVENUE SUPERINTENDENT, EDAPPALLY ZONE, KOCHI CORPORATION, EDAPPALLY, KOCHI. BY ADV. SRI.C.M.SURESH BABU,SC,COCHIN CORPORATI FOR R1, THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYV DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.3160/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DT 15.4.1986. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DT 15.12.1986. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DT 15.12.1986. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE PROPERTY TAX RECEIPT DT 5.6.1987. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT 20.1.1996. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT 27.11.2007. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT 27.11.2007. EXT.P8: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT 15.1.2008. EXT.P9: TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DT 24.4.2006. EXT.P10: TRUE COPY OF the PASSBOOK ISSUED BY COCHIN CORPORATION. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 3160 OF 2008 A ==================== Dated this the 16th day of July, 2008 J U D G M E N T The prayer in this writ petition is to direct the respondents to allot a separate building number to the upstair portion of the building constructed by the petitioner in 10 cents of property in Sy.No.48/2 of Punithura village. There is a further prayer to assess the property tax separately in respect of the aforesaid upstair portion. 2. The Corporation has filed a statement and Ext.R1(a) has been produced, which indicates that upstair portion has been given Door No.35/3095-A(UA). It is also stated that such numbering was necessitated because the petitioner had not produced completion plan of the building constructed by him. It is also stated that if the petitioner produces the completion plan, the Corporation is willing to consider the matter afresh and pass appropriate orders thereof. 3. Though in the writ petition, it is stated that along with Ext.P7 representation dated 27/11/2007, petitioner had submitted a plan, the petitioner has not produced anything to prove such assertion. That apart, there is also no mention of any plan having been enclosed to Ext.P7 in the WPC 3160/08 :2 : representation itself. 4. In view of the above, the only direction that is possible is to direct the petitioner to produce the completion plan as required by the Corporation and to direct the Corporation to consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing that it will be open to the petitioner to produce the completion plan as required by the Corporation and that on such production, the Corporation shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders on the request made by the petitioner for assignment of a separate building number for the upstair portion of the building constructed by him in Sy.No.48/2 of Punithura Village. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp