FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION C.A.NO132 OF 2007 IN F.A.ST.NO.28317 OF 2006 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms. Nisha Dabhade for the Applicant. Mr.S.V.Gole for the Respondent. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 12, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Advocates appearing for the parties. Application is opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent by pointing that there is no sufficient cause for condonation of delay. 2. Though the application may not be happily drafted, in view of what is set out in Paragraph Nos. 2 and 3, delay deserves to be condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs.3500/-. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to condition of the applicant paying costs of Rs.3500/- to the respondent within a period of eight weeks from today. Payment of costs will be a condition precedent. (A.S. OKA, J.)