1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 238/2010. (Smt. Kusum Vimalchand Jain and others -: versus :- Smt. Maindabai Trilokchand Jain and others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JANUARY 19, 2010. Heard Shri G.E. Moharir, learned counsel for petitioners. In a suit, after plaintiff closed their evidence an order of no cross was also passed thereafter, and then an application for recalling was made which came to be granted on 15.07.2009. At that stage both the parties filed Pursis [Exh.89] contending that the matter was likely to be compromised, the matter was adjourned and thereafter on 24.11.2009, application for amendment was filed by the petitioners / defendants in Special Civil Suit No. 498/2005. Trial Court has found the amendment neither bonafide nor necessary. Shri Moharir, learned counsel for petitioners / defendants has stated that written statement contained bare plea in this respect and on the basis of knowledge drawn during compromise meetings, written statement was sought to be amended. 2 I have perused the application. I find that effort is to reopen entire trial again. In this situation, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter at this state. Liberty to petitioners to challenge adverse orders after the suit is finally decided, if occasion therefor arises. Writ Petition is thus dismissed, with no order as to cost. JUDGE Rgd.