CRM No. M 21913 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 21913 of 2009 Date of decision: 02.05.2011 Gurlal Singh and others ........ Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: None for the petitioners Ms Gurveen H Singh, Addl. A G Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for issuance of direction to the official respondents to submit the report under Section 173 Cr.P.C in case FIR No. 27 dated 21.04.2007 under section 324, 323, 341, 506, 34 IPC and Section 25, 54, 59 of Arms Act, P S Nathana District Bathinda. Reply has been filed by the State. As per the reply, the cancellation report was filed before the Illaqa Magistrate, Bathinda but the learned Court disagreed with the same and ordered to conduct fresh investigation. Thereafter, the matter was reinvestigated. As per the latest CRM No. M 21913 of 2009 2 investigation, canellation report has been once again before the Illaqa Magistrate, Bathinda on 07.12.2009. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to dispute the same. Thus, it is apparent that the cancellation report has since been filed. In case, the same is pending, the petitioner is always at liberty to file his objection/protest petition, if so advised. However, in case, the same has been accepted, the petitioner is always at liberty to challenge the said order in accordance with law unless the said order has already attained finality. In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous and dismissed as such. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 02.05.2011 mohan