IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2010 / 2ND MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 945 of 2010(P) ------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHAJAHAN @ SHAJI, S/O.ALIYAKANNU RAWTHER, AGED 40, BUNGLAWIL PUTHEN VEEDU, UDAYAGIRI, EDAMON P.O., KOLLAM DIST., PIN-691 307. BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE SRI.S.VAIDYANATHAN SRI.P.PRIJITH RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, THENMALA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THENMALA P.O., KOLLAM DIST. 2. NOUSHAD ROSHAN, S/O.SAIDALAVI, NOUSHAD MANZIL, EDAMON P.O., KOLLAM DIST, PIN-691 307. ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.945 of 2010 (P) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 22nd day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner filed this writ petition stating that he was issued Ext.P7 notice alleging that certain illegal constructions were made by him. It is his case that he filed Ext.P8 reply requiring time to produce certain documents and that thereafter there was no response from the 1 st respondent. Subsequently he filed this writ petition on the apprehension that final orders prejudicial to his interest will be passed by the Panchayat without granting him an opportunity to make his representation in the matter. When this matter is came up today for orders, the learned counsel for the petitioner informed that subsequent to the filing of this writ petition, the Panchayat issued notice to the petitioner giving him an opportunity of hearing and that he was heard on 16/01/2010. If that be so, the apprehension on the basis of which this writ petition has been filed no longer survives. Now that notice has been issued, the petitioner was heard, it is up to the Panchayat WP(C) No.945/2010 -2- to pass orders in regard to Ext.P7 dealing with the contentions raised by the petitioner. Needless to say that the order so passed will be communicated to the petitioner for him to work out his remedies, if he is aggrieved by the same. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg