sk 1 wp6687.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.6687 OF 2010 Shri Shailesh S. Tathavadkar : Petitioner V/s. Pimpri Cinchwad New Town Development Authority & Ors. : Respondents .... Mr.S.V.Pitre for the petitioner. Mr.Vijay Patil for respondent no.1. Ms M.P.Thakur, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondent nos.2 & 3. .... CORAM : S.A. BOBDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 07, 2011. P.C.: Rule, returnable forthwith. The learned counsel for the respective respondents waive service. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 24.3.2004 cancelling the allotment of a plot reserved for him by the Pimpri Chinchwad New Town Development Authority. There does not appear to be a dispute that sk 2 wp6687.10 the petitioner has paid an amount of Rs.2,04,750/-. However, it seems equally beyond doubt that the petitioner failed to submit the documents demanded of him by the authority vide letters dated 27.6.2003 and 17.12.2003 at exh.`3’ & `4’ to the affidavit-in-reply of the respondent no.1. The respondents, therefore, had no option but to cancel the allotment since the documents which were withheld by the petitioner were important and germane to the question of allotment of the plot to the petitioner. Mr.Patil, the learned counsel for the respondent no.1 authority states that the authority proposes to re-auction the plot and the petitioner will be entitled to take part in the auction. The statement is accepted. 3. In the result, there is no merit in the petition which is hereby dismissed. Rule shall stand discharged. (S.A. BOBDE, J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)