BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Thirteenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13695 of 2011 1. MUNIASAMY 2. KANAGAUTHU 3. PANDI 4. ARIVALAGAN 5. MARI 6. RANI 7. VEDAKANI 8. ISAKKIAMMAL 9. GOMATHI 10. MURUGESAN S/O.ARULAPPAN 11. GANESAN 12. MURUGESAN S/O.SADAYAN 13. SUDALAIKANNAN 14. PERUMAL S/O.CHITIRAI 15. SARAVANAN 16. MANDHIRAM 17. IRUDAYAM 18. PERUMAL S/O.ARULAPPAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. CR NO.207/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.A.EBENEZER Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police, for offences under Sections 341, 143 and 188 IPC in Crime no.207 of 2011, the petitioners have come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, there was an accident in a village involving a transport corporation bus. Thereafter demanding to erect speed breaks at the place of occurrence, the petitioners, who are all villagers, held road rogo, thereby preventing the easy flow of traffic. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3. Having regard to the nature of allegations and also the fact that the petitioners are villagers and their demand is also genuine one, though the method adopted is wrong, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with conditions. 4. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. sd/- 13/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SATHANKULAM. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TUTICORIN. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1CC TO M/S. T.A.EBENEZER ADVOCATE SR.NO.35658 +1CC TO M/S.A.VADIVEL, ADVOCATE SR : 35655 SR : 18.10.2011 : 2P/7C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13695 of 2011 Date :13/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/