SiNGtEBEMCH ^ t^l' IN THB HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 3^.^ /2010 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITIUTION OF THE INDIA PETITIONER Shekh Abdul Rajjak S/o. Shekh Abdul Gani Rathoro, aged about 38 years, R/o. Near Railway Station Champa, Distt. Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ss^ ';^^".., l^&.-"__01. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. 1. Regional Transport Authority Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) ^^^..^^^W^^^K-,.,.^.^^^ \s- mCH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B: Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra W.P.fONo. 3358/2010 PETITIONER : ShekhAbdulRajjak (^(ersus RESPONDENTS : Regional Transport Authority Bflaspur (C.G.) and Another. Appearance: Shri Anshul R. Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents. WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORAL ORDER (09.07.2010) In this petition under article 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia, the petitioner has raised a grievance that he has moved an application vide Annexure P-1 on 26/02/10, before respondent No.l for grant of regular stage carriage permit, on the route Champa to Korba via Barpali, Urga with two return trips daily. Further, till date the application has not been disposed ofby the respondents. 2. Leamed counsel for the petitioner further submits that his only prayer in the writ petition is for issuance of a direction to the respondents to consider the application for grant of regular stage carriage permit in accordance with the provisions of the Motor 'K 1 Vehicle Act and the mles framed therein. il89^BiUS^ri^^^^^^^K^^^^^^^^^B^SB^^8S^il^^^S \4 y 3. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondent submits that if the applications are complete in all respect and are pending before concerned authority, it shall be communicated to the authority to dispose of the application within reasonable time from the date of production ofcertified copy ofthe order by the petitioner. 4. In view of the statement made by leamed counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.l to consider and decide the petitioner's application dated 26/02/10 within a reasonable time from the date of production of certified copy ofthis order by the petitioner. 5. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion about the right and entitlement of the petitioner and that tiie concemed authority shall examine the application on its own merit and dispose ofthe same in accordance with law. Sd/- prashantKumarMishra