IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.31331-M of 2010 Date of Decision:22.11.2010 Raj Kumar .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Bajwa, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Prayer made in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.139 dated 2.10.2010 registered under Section 22/61/85 of the NDPS Act at Police Station Division No.5, District Jalandhar. It is contended that the drug i.e. Spasmo Proxyvon, which is recovered from the present petitioner at the most falls under the provisions of Drugs and Cosmetic Act as such the offence under the NDPS Act is not attracted. Reliance has also been placed on the judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Rajeev Kumar v. State of Punjab 1997(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 846. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has brought to the notice of this Court the FSL report vide which following ingredients were found: Ingredients present Average quantity of ingredients in the parcels No. Dextroproposyphene 1 2 3 4 Hydrochloride 10.3% 10.2% -- -- Dextropropoxyphene -- -- 99.8mg/ 99.8mg/cap Napsylate capsule Crl. M. No.31331-M of 2010 -2- Dextropropoxyphene -- -- 9.8mg/cap 9.8mg/cap hydrochloride Paraetamol -- -- 399.9mg/ 399.9mg/cap capsule As per item No.33 of NDPS, Act, 1985, Dextroproposyphene falls under the NDPS Act. No ground for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Dismissed. 22.11.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE