1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. JUDGMENT Dinesh Chand Chaturvedi Vs. M/s Kota Auto Finance Pvt. Ltd. SB CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.1232/2010. Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. DATE OF ORDER: 2nd August, 2010. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. PATHAK Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi for the petitioner. Mrs.Rekha Madnani PP for the State. BY THE COURT:- This petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed against the order dated 29.6.2009 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate and Special Judge (Communal Riots) Cases Kota in Criminal Case No.1050/2005 and that of the order dated 6.5.2010 passed by the learned revisional court whereby the revision petition has been dismissed. Briefly stated the facts for the disposal of the case are that an application was moved before the learned trial court to connect another case bearing no.714/2008 with the present case and both the cases be tried together as in the above case cognizance under section 420 IPC was taken against the complainant of the present case. The learned trial court after hearing found that the matter pending before the court was in relation to a cheque which was issued by the petitioner to M/s Kota 2 Auto Finance Company. The evidence of the parties was complete in the case. The learned trial court also found that the present matter was of the year 2001 whereas prayer made to connect another case is concerned, in that case cognizance was taken in the year 2008, therefore, rejected the application. The revision petition preferred before the revisional court has also been dismissed. The contention of the learned counsel has been that it was in the interest of justice to have connected and tried two cases together but both the courts below have committed illegality in not properly appreciating the legal position. It is contended that in the interest of justice both the cases were required to be tried together. I have considered the submissions made before me and perused the impugned orders available on the file. It appears that there are two cases; one is pending since 2001 and another is of 2008. The complaint of Negotiable Instruments Act is pending since 2001. The trial in that case is complete. The trial court has assigned reasons for rejecting the application. Those reasons were found in accordance with law by the revisional court, therefore, there does not remain much scope left in this petition. In view of the discussed facts of the case in finding that the courts below have properly appreciated the matter and committed no illegality, therefore, this misc. petition being devoid 3 of merit is liable to be dismissed. In the result, this misc. petition is dismissed. (S.P. PATHAK),J BBLM