IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.496 of 2005 SANJAY PRASAD SON OF SHRI JOGENDRA PRASAD -- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SAVITA DEVI D/O KRISTO LAL VERMA & W/O SANJAY PRASAD 3. PRIYA MINOR DAUGHTER OF SHRI SANJAY KUMAR 4. VIKASH MINOR SON OF SANJAY KUMAR -- OPP.PARTIES. ----------- 09. 01.09.2010 Heard both sides. While assailing the order impugned dated 04.03.2005, passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna in Maintenance case no. 72M of 1998, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is prepared to maintain and keep his wife/opposite party no. 2 in the matrimonial home. Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that in view of the facts stated before the Court below and findings recorded thereon she is not inclined to live with petitioner. It appears that learned trial Court, on a consideration of entire materials on record, has granted maintenance for a sum of Rs. 500/- (Five hundred) per month to the wife/ opposite party no.2, and Rs. 250/- (Two hundred fifty) each to the son and daughter of the applicant/wife. This Court does not find any illegality and/or impropriety in the order. There is no merit in this application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Learned counsel for the opposite parties, at this stage, submits that the applicant/wife is not getting any amount from the petitioner. Let her approach the Court below for appropriate action in this regard. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)