THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No :853 of 2009 DATED:27.06.2011 Between: G.Lalith Mohan. ..... PETITIONER And V.Shakuntala & 3 others. .....RESPONDENTS ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 26.12.2008, in I.A.No.338 of 2007 in O.S.No.593 of 1995 on the file of the learned IV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, wherein the said application filed under Order IX Rule 13 and Section 151 CPC by the petitioner herein seeking to set aside the ex parte decree, dated 20.07.1996, was allowed, subject to filing the written statement by the petitioner. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. None appeared for the respondents. Perused the record. 3. Petitioner herein is the third party to the proceedings. 4th respondent herein filed the suit for specific performance of agreement of sale against the respondents 1 to 3. An ex parte decree was passed on 20.07.1996. Subsequently, petitioner herein is said to have purchased the property through the 4th respondent- plaintiff-decree-holder. Thereafter, respondents filed I.A.No.138 of 2007 for setting aside the ex parte decree under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. Previously, petitioner herein filed I.A.(SR).Nos.3377 & 3748 of 2007 seeking leave to get impleaded and also for condoning the delay etc., As the said applications were rejected petitioner herein filed three Civil Revision Petition Nos.4838; 4849 and 4861 of 2007. This Court by common order, dated 03.12.2010, allowed the said petitions and set aside the orders passed in the interlocutory applications and directed the trial Court to process the three applications filed by the petitioner herein, number the same and take up the matter for disposal on merits in accordance with law after giving notice and opportunity to both parties. In view of the said orders passed by this Court on 03.12.2010 in the three Civil Revision Petitions filed by the petitioners herein, it is considered that the present Civil Revision Petition is to be disposed of directing the trial Court to pass appropriate orders on merits in accordance with law after disposal of the three applications filed by the petitioner herein. In the circumstances, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded as such. 4. In the result, Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY,J 27th June, 2011. Tsy