1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.17 OF 2005. IN SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.238 OF 2003 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.3494 OF 2002 Sonali P. Shah. ... Plaintiff. vs. Land Mark Processors and another. .... Defendants. --- Mr.D.P.Shah, for Plaintiff. Mr.Ajay Mishra i/b. Ajay Mishra & Co., for Defendants. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 13th January, 2006 P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for both the sides. It appears that the defendants were in the process of changing their Lawyer as the papers were returned by the earlier lawyer. In the meantime the suit was placed for hearing. The defendants did not remain present. The 2 defendants are willing to pay costs. In this view of the matter therefore, the notice of motion is granted in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to the condition that within a period of two weeks from today the defendants pay to the plaintiff as and by way of cost of this notice of motion Rs.5000/- . ---