THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA C.R.P.No.3901 of 2007 ORAL ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 2. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 01.05.2007, passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Gudivada, in C.M.A.No.1 of 2007. 3. By the impugned order, the lower appellate Court dismissed the appeal, confirming the order, dated 02.01.2007, passed in I.A.No.1378 of 2006 in O.S.No.439 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gudivada. 4. The petitioners are the plaintiffs and the respondents are the defendants in the said suit. 5. For the sake of convenience, in this order, the parties will be referred to as arrayed in the suit. 6. Obviously, as could be seen from the record, the trial Court dismissed the application filed by the plaintiffs under Order 39 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to grant temporary injunction and the same was confirmed by the lower appellate Court, as against which the present Revision Petition is filed. 7. There are no merits in the Civil Revision Petition or even prima facie case to grant temporary injunction as prayed for by the plaintiffs. This Court cannot reappraise the entire material on record and arrive at a different conclusion than the one arrived at by both the Courts below. 8. I do not find any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order warranting interference by this Court, at this stage and accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is liable to be dismissed. 9. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 27th October 2009 DR