IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16528 of 2011 Gopi Kumar son of Braj Kishore Prasad of village & P.O. Bhalar, P.S. Dharhara, Munger. ---Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India through the Secretary Union of India Home Department, N.Delhi. 2. The Director General, CRPF, Lodhi Road, C.G.O. Complex, N. Block, N.Delhi. 3. The Inspector General, CRPF Bihar Sector Patna 25. 4. The DIG of Police Group Centre CRPF, Mokama. 5. The Commandant, Recruitment Board, G.C.Mokama Bihar ---Respondents. --------- 02 21.09.2011 Heard Mr. Ram Hriday Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. S.K. Sharma, learned Central Government Counsel for the respondent Union and its officials. Petitioner was an applicant for the post of constable GD (Male) in Central Reserve Police Force (for short ‘CRPF’). The petitioner’s case is that he was declared successful at the physical eligibility test followed by written test whereafter he was subjected to medical fitness test. At the said test, he was declared medically unfit on account of defective distant vision. Document in support thereof is Annexure-2. It is further the petitioner’s case that he got himself medically examined by Civil Assistant Surgeon, Sadar Hospital, Munger, who found the petitioner medically fit for the post. The said document is not on record. It is the case of the petitioner that armed with the aforesaid certificate, he filed appeal within time for subjecting him to Review Medical Board. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondents have not passed orders thereon, and as a result whereof, he has not been subjected to Review Medical Board on the strength of appeal/application filed by him within time. Petitioner made a representation in this regard before the 2 respondent no. 3 ( Inspector General of Police , CRPF) but the same also yielded no result. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the authorities, before whom the representation is filed ventilating his grievance, be directed to consider and dispose of his representation in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the respondent points out that except stating in the application no document has been filed to show that the petitioner was found medically fit by the Civil Assistant Surgeon and that he filed appeal within time. However, considering the stand taken by the petitioner, learned counsel states that the present application may be disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Having heard the parties and on going through the materials on record, this Court is satisfied that the present application be disposed of by the following order:- Let the petitioner file a fresh representation ventilating his grievance before the respondent no.4 ( Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, CRPF, Mokama) within a period of 04 weeks annexing therewith copy of the present order whereafter said respondent shall go through the relevant record and consider the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law. Such consideration be completed by disposing of his representation by a reasoned order within a period of 06 weeks of its filing. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)