1 ABA-879.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.879 OF 2011 {For Anticipatory Bail} Chandrakant C. Anandpara .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent S/Shri Niranjan Mundargi i/b Yogesh Israni for the Applicant. Ms P.P. Bhosale, APP, for the State. Shri N.K. Kapse, PI, EOW, Crime Branch, present. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: NOVEMBER 25, 2011 P.C: Leave to amend. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant points out that since it was not possible for the applicant to locate a property admeasuring 111.70 sq.mtrs., the applicant has handed over a cheque for Rs.81,87,610/- to MHADA as per the ready reckoner price at Rs.73,300/- per sq.mtr., in addition to the surplus built up area admeasuring 25.52 sq.mtrs., which the applicant is handing over to MHADA and of which 2 ABA-879.11 MHADA can take immediate possession. In view of this, since according to MHADA itself initially MHADA had asked the applicant to handover only 25.52 sq.mtrs. of surplus built up area and MHADA subsequently changed its policy and asked for 137.22 sq.mtrs. of surplus built up area, the applicant's being in custody for the purpose of investigation into the crime, if any, is not at all necessary, though the learned APP has a strong objection. In view of this, MHADA may encash the cheque which has been submitted by the applicant without prejudice to its rights. If the cheque bounces, this order shall stands revoked. The amount may be held by MHADA in trust till the trial is over. 3. In view of the above, in the event of the applicant s arrest by the E.O.W., Unit-II, Mumbai in C.R. No.59 of 2011, the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the sum aggregating to Rs.25,000/-. 4. The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from 3 ABA-879.11 disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and he shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the trial Court. 5. This order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge-sheeted, the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., reported in AIR 2011 SC 312. 6. The application accordingly stands disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)