IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.6621 of 2011 VIJAY RAI son of Late Sukhdeo Sharma Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 23.03.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph 10 of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Considering that for misuse of privilege of bail for about five years the petitioner has remained in custody since 07.10.2010 and undertakes to remain present in future, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No.1, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sessions Trial No.91 of 2002, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and another bailor shall be Arun Kumar, son of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, and (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each 2 date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The trial court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of nine months since the occurrence is of the year 1999. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)