IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10335 of 2010 1. BHIKHAN PASWAN son of Rito Paswan 2. Chhatar Paswan, son of Bhikhan Paswan 3. Butan Paswan son of Bhikhan Paswan All residents of vill.-Harilaundi, P.S.-Chandarmandih, Distt.-Jamui------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------------- 3. 28.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Both the stolen articles diesel in drum and battery were recovered on confession of co-accused Ranjit Paswan, petitioner no.1’s son naming these petitioners also as his accomplices disentitle petitioner nos.2 and 3 to bail. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner nos.2 and 3 is rejected. After dictating the order learned counsel appearing for the petitioners forced the Court to make detailed order. What was submitted on his behalf is replied while rejecting its bail. If a Court is forced to pass a judgement for allowing or rejecting anticipatory bail petition, proper functioning of the Court will hamper. Even then this Court may not be blamed for not noting the detailed submission made from lawyer’s end. His submission was that no liability could be fixed basing confession of co-accused Ranjit Paswan which is the only evidence. It was not simply a confession but inculpatory confession leading to recovery naming his family members at the stage of anticipatory bail. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J. )