THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.10581 of 2009 Dated : 17.02.2010 Between : M.Hanumanth Rao ….. Petitioner-Accused a n d The State of A.P. & another ….. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.10581 OF 2009 ORDER : This criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioner-Accused seeking to quash the orders dated 09.12.2009 passed in Crl.R.P.No.24 of 2009 on the file of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar. 2) Heard. 3) Petitioner herein filed Crl.M.P.No.1863 of 2008 under Section 91 Cr.P.C. before the II Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, praying the Court to direct the de facto complainant to produce certain income tax returns as mentioned in the said petition, which was dismissed by the learned Magistrate, upon which, the petitioner preferred a revision in Crl.R.P.No.24 of 2009, which was also dismissed by the learned Sessions Judge by the impugned order and as against the same present criminal petition is filed. 4) The learned counsel for the second respondent contends that the income-tax returns that are sought to be produced are of the years 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and neither the originals nor the copies of the same are available with the respondent. Material on record reveals that the second respondent-de facto complainant took a plea that his wife filed income tax returns too. 5) Considering the circumstances, it is directed that the present petitioner-accused can file a fresh petition before the trial Court for summoning the required documents i.e. income-tax returns of the petitioner and his wife for the years 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 from the concerned authorities and in case the same are available with concerned authorities after this lapse of time, the same might be produced by the authorities concerned. 6) However, for completion of all this process, the trial Court shall not grant more than three months time from the date of receipt of a copy of this order as it is the contention of the learned counsel for the second respondent that the petitioner filed this petition with an intention to drag on the proceedings and the C.C. is of the year 2006. In case, by the end of three months, the proceedings of summoning and receiving the income-tax returns is not completed, no further steps need be taken with regard to the same and it shall be the sole responsibility of the present petitioner to get the abovesaid income-tax returns. The only contribution of the second respondent is to furnish the PAN numbers of himself and his wife to the petitioner. 7) Accordingly, the criminal petition is disposed of. ______________________ P.SWAROOP REDDY, J 17th February, 2010 SUR