IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1771 of 2007 MADHUSUDAN SAH son of Sri Bindeshwari Sah, resident of village Kalupakar, P.S. Penhara, District East Champaran… …Defendant/Petitioner Versus 1. KAMESHWAR TIWARY son of Sri Ramlakhan Tiwary, resident of village Kalupakar, P.S. Penhara, District East Champaran… … Plaintiff/Opposite Party 2. Uma Shankar Prasad son of Ram Swaroop Prasad, resident of Kalu Pakar, P.S. Fenhara, Block Patahi, District East Champaran… Defendant/Opposite party ------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Abhay Kirshna, Advocate For O.P. No. 1: Mr. Shyama Kant Singh, Advocate ----------- 2 12.03.2010 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this civil revision. Leave is granted. The civil revision is dismissed as withdrawn. However, it has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the amendment in the plaint has been allowed by the impugned order in the court below. Thus, if the defendant-petitioner files an application either for grant of leave for filing additional written statement or for amendment in the written statement already filed in view of the amendment allowed in the plaint, such application shall be disposed of by the concerned court in accordance with law. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)