IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 618 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 794 OF 2008 SHRI. GAJANAN ATMA PAL ... Applicant Versus GOVERNMENT OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 4 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. D. B. Ambekar,Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S.R. Rivonkar,Advocate for Respondent No. 1. Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. H. Kankonkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 5. Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4. Coram:- SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 16th November, 2009 P.C. Heard learned Counsel on behalf of both the parties. There is no urgency shown on behalf of the Petitioners. The petitioner is not entitled to any preference because of his age, either. Let Writ Petition No. 794/2008 come for final hearing in its own course. Similarly, let Writ Petition No. 111/2009 come for admission in its own course. With above observations, M.C.A. 618/2009 is disposed of. SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. MF/-