1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 72/2011 (Sayyad Mujibuddin Sayyad Habiboddin .vs. State of Mah. Through PSO PS Pusad City, Dist. Yeotmal ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. O.D. Kakde, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. D.P. Thakre, APP for Respondent. .......... CORAM : P.D. KODE, J. DATED : MARCH 18, 2011 Heard. For the reasons recorded in the order dated 3.3.2011 an ad-interim direction was given in favour of the applicant in connection with the arrest apprehended by him with regard to Crime No. 21/2011 registered with Pusad Police Station for the offence under Section 420 of Cr.P.C. Certain conditions were imposed to ensure that giving of such a direction does not hamper the investigation in progress for the said crime. Notice of the said application was given to the other side and in pursuance to the same, the prosecution has today filed the reply. Having regard to the matters stated in the said reply and so also the reasons given for giving such direction, it is difficult to perceive of any case being made for the custodial interrogation of the applicant and 2 hence cancelling/revoking said direction. Having regard to the same and having regard to the fact that the learned APP having not refuted of applicant having abided the conditions imposed while giving the direction earlier, the same deserves to be confirmed. The same appears accordingly in view of considering the case of the applicant in the light of the guidelines given by the Apex Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre .vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. reported in 2010 (12) SCALE 691 in paragraphs 122 to 125. In the premises aforesaid, the ad-interim direction given on 3.3.2011 hereby stands confirmed. The application stands disposed of. JUDGE halwai