IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 11TH MARCH 2011 / 20TH PHALGUNA 1932 CRL.MC.NO. 671 OF 2011() -------------------------------------- CRIME NO.818 OF 2010 OF CHAVAKKAD POLICE STATION PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED -------------------------------------- SHAMEER, S/O.MOHAMEDUNNI, PALATHUMVEETTIL HOUSE, CHETTUVA P.O., CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENT(S): STATE ------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SHIMNA RAJEEV, AGED 29 YEARS, W/O.RAJEEV, CHENJERI HOUSE, THEEKEN PALAYOOR, CHAVAKKAD VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI K.J. MOHAMMED ANZAR R1 ADV. SRI.V.V.JOY FOR R2 THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J. ==================================== Crl. M.C. No. 671 of 2011 ==================================== Dated this the 11th day of March, 2011 O R D E R Petitioner seeks to quash Annexure-A, FIR in Crime No.818 of 2010 of Chavakkad Police Station for offence punishable under Section 511 of Section 379 the Indian Penal Code. Case is that on 31.08.2010 at about 11.30 a.m. a person who came on a motor bike attempted to snatch the gold chain of the second respondent. Petitioner admits his involvement in the incident and seeks to quash proceedings against him on the strength of a settlement reached with the second respondent. I have heard learned counsel for petitioner, second respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the police has submitted a final report implicating petitioner as accused in the aforesaid crime. Learned Public Prosecutor also submitted that parties have settled the dispute and the settlement came at a time when police was searching the person who was on the motor cycle involved in the incident. 2. Learned counsel appearing for second respondent confirmed settlement and authenticity of Annexure-B, affidavit. It CRL.M.C. No.671 of 2011 -: 2 :- is seen from the affidavit that the dispute is settled between petitioner and second respondent. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that no other case is reported against petitioner. In that view of the matter I am inclined to allow this petition. Resultantly, Criminal Miscellaneous Case is allowed. Annexure-A, FIR in Crime No.818 of of 2010 of Chavakkad Police Station and all proceeding pursuant to it including the final report to the extent it concerned petitioner are quashed. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE. vsv