IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.250 of 2010 (M/S) Subhash Goyal, S/o Sri Beer Chandra Goyal R/o 1680 Vijay Nagar, Hisar, Haryana .…Petitioner Versus Swami Brahmanand Ji & others ...Respondents Mr. B.S. Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. As per office report respondents are duly served. Inspite of service none is present for the respondents. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the impugned order dated 22.10.2009 passed by learned Civil Judge (Sr. Div), Rishikesh whereby interim injunction application in O.S. No.12 of 2009 was granted in favour of plaintiff/respondent no.1. It has also been prayed in the writ petition that Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Rishikesh be directed to decide the O.S. No.12 of 2009 expeditiously. Brief facts of the case are that learned counsel for the plaintiff/respondent no.1 instituted a suit for permanent injunction for restraining the defendants from interfering in the property in possession. Plaintiff/respondent no.1 also filed an application under Order 39 Rule 2 for interim injunction in which summon were issued to the defendants and 30.10.2009 was fixed for disposal of the interim injunction application. The petitioner 2 as well as respondent nos.2 & 3 filed their joint submission to which replica was also filed by the petitioner/defendants. On 22.10.2009 the interim injunction application was considered by learned Civil Judge, (Sr. Div.) Rishikesh, Dehradun and same was decided in favour of plaintiff/respondent no.1 by granting interim injunction. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considered the documents filed alongwith the writ petition. I do not find any illegality in the order passed by leaned Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Rishikesh. During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer to the effect that Civil Judge, (Sr. Div.), Rishikesh, Dehradun be directed to decide the O.S. No.12 of 2009 expeditiously. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge, (Sr. Div.), Rishikesh, Dehradun to decide the O.S. No.12 of 2009 expeditiously, preferably within a period of nine months from today. (V.K.Bist. J,) 17.05.2010 Arti 3