IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.544 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.544 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.544 OF 2005 Sanjay Gupta & Anr. : Petitioners. versus Union Territory of Dadara Nagar Haveli & Anr. : Respondents. Mr.R.V.Govilkar for the petitioners. Mr.G.R.Agrawal for Respondent No.1. Dr.F.R.Shaikh, APP, for the State. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE,J. DATED : 31st July 2006. DATED : 31st July 2006. DATED : 31st July 2006. ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER 1. Heard advocate Mr.Govilkar, appearing for the petitioners and advocate Mr.Agrawal, appearing for Respondent No.1. This petition is filed for quashing a complaint dated 24.1.2005 lodged by Respondent No.2, as per Exhibit A annexed to this petition. The complaint is under the Electricity Act. Advocate for the petitioners relied upon the judgment of this Court reported in 2006 All MR (Cri) 725 All MR (Cri) 725 All MR (Cri) 725 (M/s.Shakambari Industries & Anr. vs. State of (M/s.Shakambari Industries & Anr. vs. State of (M/s.Shakambari Industries & Anr. vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr.] Maharashtra & Anr.] Maharashtra & Anr.] wherein the FIR filed at Akola under the provisions of Electricity Act was quashed. Both the advocates have agreed that this judgment squarely applies to the facts of the present case. Therefore, Rule, returnable forthwith. Petition is allowed. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J]