IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3022 of 2010 1. RAM PRASAD MISHRA S/O LATE SANSARI MISHRA R/O VILL CHHATARPATI,P.S.GOPALPUR,P.O.BODHA CHAPAR,VIA-NATUA JALALPUR,DISTT- GOPALGANJ,AT PRESENT POSTED AT SARAN CANAL DIVISION,GANDAK PROJECT,GOPALGANJ Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SICHAI BHAWAN,BIHAR,PATNA 2. THE ENGINEER -IN-CHIEF ,WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SICHAI BHAWAN,BIHAR,PATNA 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER ,WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT SIWAN 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER ,WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT SIWAN 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ,SARAN CANAL DIVISION GOPALGANJ 6. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER,SARAN CANAL DIVISION GOPALGANJ ----------- 2. 24.02.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The prayer simpliciter in this application challenging the order of transfer dated 28.6.2009 is that appropriate direction for consideration of the representation may be made in the light of orders in CWJC no. 1055 of 2010. Learned Counsel for the State rightly submits that it remains for factual verification whether the petitioner is similarly situated as those in the aforesaid writ application. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into merits of the mater. Let the respondent no. 5 examine the representation of the petitioner and only in the event that he is satisfied that the petitioner is similarly situated as the petitioner in CWJC No. 1055 of 2010 shall he be expected to accord him similar treatment and not otherwise. Let such representation be disposed by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of one months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)