1 sl220 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET FIRST APPEAL NO.366 OF 1992, FIRST APPEAL NO.365 OF 1992, FIRST APPEAL NO.368 OF 1992, FIRST APPEAL NO.369 OF 1992 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. None for the Appellant None for the respondent CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JULY 25,2011 P.C.: 1 On 28th June 2011 when the appeals were called out, adjournment was sought by the Advocate for the Appellant. Only by way of indulgence, adjournment was granted till today. The order dated 28th June 2011 records that no further adjournment will be granted. 2 Today, when the appeals are called out for final hearing, none appears for the appellant.Hence, appeals are dismissed in exercise of power under Rule 17 of Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908. Civil application no.884 of 1992 and 2 sl220 882 of 1992 do not survive and the same are disposed of. MENTIONED AT 5.00 P.M. Ms Khyati Ghevaria i/b M/s.Dhru and Co. for the appellant. . Mentioned at the end of the day. On the oral prayer made by the learned counsel for the appellant, order of dismissal passed today in the morning session is recalled and the appeals are restored. The learned counsel for the appellant seeks time. . On 13th January and 21st March 2011, adjournments were granted at the request of the Appellant. When the appeals were called out for final hearing on 28th June 2011, adjournment was again granted to the appellant only by way of indulgence. In the order dated 28th June 2011, it is specifically observed that no further adjournment will be granted. Therefore, request for adjournment cannot be acceded to and the appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. Civil application no.884 of 1992 and 882 of 1992 do not survive and the same are disposed of. JUDGE