^. IN THE HIGH COUjKT OF JUDICATURE^I BILASPUR. GHATTISGARH WP N0;—3-l4—-/ 2002. PETmONER .._) RESPONDENTS ^" ^ K-^'^'X ^ yf' d '••l-" ^y^ ^y^ BJ.PANDEY, S/0 LATESHRIC.L. PANDEY, WORKINGAS SENIORASSISTANT(FIRE), AGEDABOUT43 YEARS,R/OCIVILLINES, RAIPUR(C.G^ VERSUS THE EXECUTIVE DffiECTOR(P&A), THROUGHTHE SECRETARV, AIRPOKTSACTHOMTY OFDTOIA(NAD), ^GANBHISHAWAN, SAFDARJANG ADtPORT, NEW DELm- 03 THEGENESAL MANAGER(FS), AAL (NAD)^(AJIVGANDm BHAWAN, SAFDARJANGAIRPORT, NEWBELHI-03. THE DEPCTyGENERAL MANAGER(FS), AAJ.,(NAD),]VroMBAL 4. THESENIORMANAGER(ATC),AAL (NAD)RAIPURAIRPOm,RAIPUR(C.G.). 5. THE MANAGER(PERSONAL) FORREGIONALEXECUTIVEDIRECTOR, AA.L,(NAD>M(}MBAt >- The petitioner submits as under:- 1. PARTIClILARSOFTHEFEiniONER: Asstatedabove. • 2. EARTICULARSQFTHEIffiSPQNDENTS As statedabove. XI-HC-22 3|g^'g,%[ 'SbW^ ~y:PU!^"aWEts!'s3S'!fsSS'S^^K .^^i%? ^'?^f'^^^ ^S^ •WW {,~«'!SI'S''HcyWfS!!fjf,' nitB^TWiBBt^u;£:£c^^?; 24/0il/2003 , Sliri R.M. Solapurkar,^<ipi.ia Heard. / The chaUenge ia fbis ;writi 22/11/2002 (Axuiexure e/1) wlie| eiHployee of fUe Airgprts Au(hQiit| been^transferred to Auraasabad. ' -^"' Tp^^ b^ uicideiice^f seivice aad persoui eatmot object to tus transfer:as^ eE&ployer,to deteiTnn^ a&to 'wUei oF'sIioi.iJd aot'foe posted. ?Hpwes| ••^.: / • '• '.. '• "•'..•..; • ' • •'".. .:'- teansfer wNch inay be examm.e^ \ ' •••.'.•• .•'... ;^"' '•• ... •"•• ' '-'. .' normally be the fases where SEL Irequeilt traasfers- 01 fhe traaisfKl acconuaodate a partiGular persc|i jllace fi-oin ^vher^ fhat peraon w^ the iacumbertt wbo faad joiiied of fhe previoua iacuiiibeiit ;;:^.^- cases of mala fide 6r infraetKJi .eti(jfl *i4ci4-i 'wisSVS^^i^wt -•':'; . •§?.^igi?:g]§?r 7 . ^selfer fh.e.peltifipner.; petillon is to fhe order dated jreby: tfafi^etiti&u^ wbo was aa •^" .' •'. -• -• :.•' " ' .•.••.; .' •;' of tadja pQSted at ?RaipUT, has stated fhat traiisfer is an twho lieilds a 'transferahle post |is wifhin ftie junsBietuin offhe ^a^Earticular emBldyee should yT^'- ~''1 -' ' , . er, tliere niay be some^cases pf t>y fbfi Court aud Bltese wduM iinployee has toeeu. siityected^tQ TS By^ s?ay ofItai;assiuertt or tb t)^ bnagtag Iiirq,back to tUe is teansferred aitd ;seflding out l;|hat pacfKnilar plaoe Of traasfer •/''. " '...-• Ii|teEfereace inay Tas justified ID> <rf aii^ .ip pos^ 'nonns ,or 1 ' "K :3W^ssssssSsS?^js'gHI^BE^siB^saass T XI-MC-22 3^^'3BZ(RB;s%flra:IB»,ii^e-i'i'yg.i. •m •W-R'IIaiWtB 3ii^I'9it K-s* !sSgs "ai^'^-'9^: .•y"' pruleiples. WheFc career prospo detriineiit is caused, cliaBenge to to beentertained. Thus tlie chatL "^•;.•'..:• ...'..;... ,•+. •. . ; . .;.'..• :'.. ./:..'"-:'.. .. • fhe opiniori of fhe iCourt, is to backgTouiul. Accordiag to the petitk>ner;1 and it vtolates the transfer pblU passed. iu contraveuti.011 of fhe tn that the petitioneijs| son. is to which is to be Ueld.ia March, 2! trausfer at this poiiit of fmie studies as aa acadeiiuc session N '^ : ' < Board ExatEun&tion 1s to comial ;ts reiaain unaffceted and •OQ lan.order Qftran.sfer ought not ^nge to aii order oftransfer, ia be^consideTed ia^the abbve |;th.e order is liable to quashed ty aiid obviously it has beert jiiisfer pQlicv. It is aiso stated alipeaF Xfh BoarS &xamiaation behalf oftlie couiisel for fhe facts the inatter was brought to whicb he has niade a request fpj durmg fhe session 2Q02-2003 considered aad fh.e itiLpugned ord| he has appioached 1shis Gourt for |l ^t-^$[^';"W^.^ ^^C^"^R3P!: . i;^^'Rg'E[.<g§ST:. ^ '. )03. It is also stated ftiat his wlll adversely affeet his, soii's i^Goming to aii end and the Xfh. gnce sIiorUy. It is stated on pelitioneT fhat cdiisideriug these jthe notiee of thc ^ufhorily to exeBipting WTT} &OIB. traiisfer V " afad as fU.e saine has not been .'*,_''^.";II:--; '! sroftraiisferhas been passed, / ; ,'-,. ^-•^,,' ,. telifi^ ~ , '• ;-; ^ ^ "'; • ', ' 1 ii|1-.,i-(i-w?-nai"a!-!in-SiiSSiaps-l"" .^•^^"^ XI-HC-22 't'B^-aHtsHi'SSi'iBflSi%¥» «)W)l'W;!rai' "(Ft 311%S,%I .{«;•<)*3B§g 5hqi<^M^ ,^: •t %- ,r: ^ ^ 3n^r^aiw?te -T petifliolier Iii-viefflr"offhe abovc, fhe fhe grievances which the petition could have been iBade t^ proper/ appropriate representatic^n 'daiie, the^ Court thinks it appr^ petitiou ^vifh a direction that ia the; petttioiafirlto the Goncemed today, ffaelsaine shaU be considej merits-on which tlie Court isl pourt is of th? opiruon fKat all - has: niade in this writ c&se 9\ However, it is hoped fhafia cas^ the petitioner's representation defemng the^traiisfer of the academKi session so ttiat the is-to appear in Xth Board Exami4' Wifh the' abovc observatlons petition sfaiids disposed of. aadI.A.No. 213/2002 also staad •ch)*iT<vi^i"i ^myS ^^Si'e^SR -^T aiPaT aa^r "fore the Aathonly'by way ofa Siiice fhis has not been )priate to dispose of this writ aTepreseiitationAs niadeby ^uthoirtty within len. days froiii ?ed aad disiiosed of ori its own tben not- expressiag any opiciion. fhe Authority does not accegt Stt Jeast jt wpulct corisider etitioner till fhe end of fhe sttldies dies of the petitidher's son who atlon, are not affected. and diicctions this writ Co|isequenfly, |isequently,M.W. P. No.53/2003 jlisposed of. F ~ Sd/- P. C. Naik Judge -^A ^S^t