IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 5TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 14TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 24073 of 2011(H) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- NIVYA VINOD, NIVYA NIVAS, EDACHERY, PALLIKUNNAM P.O.,PIN-670 004, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.D.SREEKUMAR. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-673 635. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENHIPALAM,MALAPPUZHAM DISTRICT-673 635 3. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY, THENHIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR-673 635. R1 TO R3 BY SRI. SANTHOSH MATHEW, S.C. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/09/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.24073/2011-H: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT: EXT.P.1: TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION OF ANSWER PAPERS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DTD. 26/08/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No. 24073 OF 2011 - H ------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a final year B.Tech Computer Science Student. She appeared for ECS 803 Internet Technology of Final Year B. Tech Examination. When the result of the said examination was declared, she had failed in the paper; viz., ECS 803 Internet Technology. She applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 10 weeks on production of a copy of this judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE rka