IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 8779 of 2004 Between: Syed Meeran Mohiuddin Quadri S/o Syed Tajuddin Quadri, R/o 2-4-696/2, A.K.M. Compound, Kachiguda, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. 2 The Asst. Commissioner of Police, Kachiguda, Hyderabad. 3 The Station House Officer, Kachiguda Police Station, Kachiguda, Hyderabad. 4 Syed Badruddin Quadri, R/o Mudfort, Secunderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in not initiating any proceedings against the 4th respondent having received the report on 16-4-2004 being the protector of law and order amounts to dereliction of duty. For the Petitioner:MRSYED SHAREEF AHMED, Advocate For the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court Made the Following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the action of the Respondents l to 3 in not initiating the proceedings against the 4th respondent in spite of the complaint received against the 4th respondent. According to the petitioner, the originally Mutavalli appointed by the competent authority has left the country and in his absence, the 4th respondent, who is the brother of the original Mutavali, is trying to interfere with the management of the institute. Therefore, the petitioner filed a complaint to take appropriate action before the respondents 1 to 3. As no action has been taken, the petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition. At the time of hearing the learned Government Pleader, on instructions, has stated that since a civil suit has already been filed, and the same is pending before the Tribunal and the issue relates to the civil dispute, the respondents-police authorities are not declining to go into the complaint lodged with them. In the light of the above, and in view of the pendency of a civil suit - O.S.171/2001, which is pending, it is proper to the petitioner to approach the Tribunal for appropriate orders. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. _____________________ S. Ananda Reddy, J. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. 2 The Asst. Commissioner of Police, Kachiguda, Hyderabad. 3 The Station House Officer, Kachiguda Police Station, Kachiguda, Hyderabad. 4. 2CCs to G.P. for Home, High Court, Hyderabad (OUT) 5. 2CD copies DVS THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. ANANDA REDDY W.P.No. 8779 of 2004 ORAL ORDER 28…06…2004