FAO No.3858 of 2008 -1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.3858 of 2008 Date of Decision: 14.5.2009 Surjeet ...Appellant. Vs. Hari Chand ...Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present : Mr.Ashok Tyagi, Advocate for the appellant. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This appeal is directed against the order dated 13.3.2008 passed by Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 Circle-IV, Gurgaon, whereby on account of injury suffered by the appellant in the accident dated 27.11.2004 in which he had become permanently disabled to the extent of 10%, compensation of Rs.40,281/- was awarded considering his age to be 32 years. The only argument raised by counsel for the appellant is that the learned Commissioner has erred in recording the age of the injured/ appellant as 32 years whereas he was 26 years of age. On a pointed query put to the counsel for the appellant as to whether any evidence is there on record which could prove that appellant was 26 years of age and not 32 years, counsel for the appellant has very fairly conceded that there is no evidence available on record. No other point has been urged in this appeal before this Court. FAO No.3858 of 2008 -2 - In view of the above, I do not find any merit in this appeal to interfere with the order of learned Court below, therefore, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (Rakesh Kumar Jain) 14.5.2009 Judge Meenu