[1] DBCWP(PAROLE)NO. 3827/2010 JAI KISHAN Vs. STATE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION(PAROLE) NO.3827/2010 JAI KISHAN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN DATE OF ORDER :: 13.08.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENA V. GOMBER By post. Mr. Rajendra Yadav, Govt. Counsel for State. **** Heard the learned Govt. Counsel. The convict-petitioner has preferred this parole writ petition by post for grant of first parole of 20 days. The respondents have filed their reply in the Court today and contended that petitioner has not even completed 1/4th of his sentence and as such, he is not eligible under Rule 9 of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 (for short 'the Rules of 1958') for grant of parole. Learned Govt. Counsel also argued that petitioner has approached for grant of parole to this Court directly without approaching the competent authority under the Rules of 1958. A copy of nominal roll has also been annexed with the reply, which clearly shows that petitioner has not completed 1/4th of his sentence. [2] DBCWP(PAROLE)NO. 3827/2010 JAI KISHAN Vs. STATE In these circumstances, the present parole writ petition is pre-mature and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. A copy of this order may be sent for information to convict-petitioner. (MEENA V. GOMBER),J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. /KKC/