IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17252 of 2010 JAY MANGAL PASWAN SON OF LATE KUWAR PASWAN, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 6B/26 TILAK MARG, NORTH SRI KRISHNAPURI, P.S. SRI KRISHNAPURI, DISTRICT- PATN13 Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, GENERAL PROVIDENT FUND, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, GAYA 5. THE TREASURY OFFICER, GAYA 6. THE TREASURY OFFICER, VIKASH BHAWAN, PATNA 7. THE DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION, BIHAR, PATNA 8. THE JOINT DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION, GAYA DIVISON, GAYA ----------- 2 11.10.2010 As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna and the Joint Director, Consolidation, Gaya Divison, Gaya as party respondent nos. 7 & 8 respectively. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner had earlier represented the matter, however, for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.3 with copy to the respondent nos. 4, 7 & 8. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the - 2 - certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid to the petitioner along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)