=1= IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.700 OF 2008 NO.700 OF 2008 NO.700 OF 2008 Shri Sampatrao R. Patil ...Petitioner v/s The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Sangli and others ...Respondents Ms D.S. Matwankar i/b Mr M.D. Parab for Petitioner. Mr P.I. Khemai, AGP for Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND S.J. KATHAWALLA JJ. : J.N. PATEL AND S.J. KATHAWALLA JJ. : J.N. PATEL AND S.J. KATHAWALLA JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 12TH DECEMBER 2008 12TH DECEMBER 2008 12TH DECEMBER 2008 P.C.- 1. By the present petition, the petitioner, who is Ex-President of the respondent No.7 - The Gandhi Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, District Sangli, seeks directions against the respondent Nos.1 and 2 viz. The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Sangli and the Deputy Director of Education, Kolhapur to conduct enquiry into the affairs of the respondent No.7 - Trust, particularly with reference to the approval of the appointments of respondent Nos..4 to 6. The petitioner =2= has alleged that the statutory authorities have failed to exercise their legal and statutory duties to look into the grievances of the petitioner against illegalities committed by the respondent Nos.4 to 6 while obtaining approval to their appointments as Shikshan Sevak and also in the matter of release of grants. The authorities ought to have seen that the respondent Nos.4 to 6 have committed fraud and prepared bogus and fabricated documents and committed forgery. 2. An affidavit in reply is filed on behalf of the respondent No.1 wherein it is pointed out that there is no forgery or bogus or fraudulent documents of respondent Nos.4 to 6 for sanctioning their proposals to the post of Shikshan Sevak and all the allegations made by the petitioner are baseless and improper. It is further pointed out by the respondent No.1 that the petitioner who is the Ex-President of respondent No.7 - Trust, had appointed the respondent Nos.4 to 6 as Shikshan Sevaks / assistant Teachers and on the said proposal of respondent No.7, the respondent Nos.1 and 2 have sanctioned those posts of the respondent Nos.4 to 6 by giving approval. It is submitted that therefore there is no necessity to make any enquiry. The learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 6 has pointed out that the issue is already subjudice before the School Tribunal, Kolhapur Region, Kolhapur. He has also =3= pointed out that the Charity Commissioner, Kolhapur has also taken suo motto cognizance against the petitioner and his associates for mismanagement of the affairs of the Trust during his tenure as President of respondent No.7. No rejoinder is filed by the petitioner to the affidavit in reply of the respondent No.1. In view thereof, no case is made out by the petitioner for interference of this Court. Writ petition stands dismissed with no order as to costs. ( J.N. PATEL J. ) ( S.J. KATHAWALLA J.)