IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1910 of 2006 LAKSHMAN PRASAD SINHA SON OF LATE SAMAN PRASAD SINHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RATANPURA, P.O. DARIYAPUR P.S. AKANGARSARAI, DISTRICT NALANDA. Versus 1. BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, VIDUT BHAWAN, BAILY ROAD, PATNA. 2. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDUT BHAWAN, BAILY ROAD, PATNA. 3. THE JOINT SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDUT BHAWAN, BAILY ROAD, PATNA. 4. THE FINANCE CONTROLLER, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VIDUT BHAWAN, BAILY ROAD, PATNA. 5. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, CENTRAL AREA, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA. 6. THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY DIVISION, AKANGARSARAI, NALANDA. ----------- 2/ 11.02.2010 Heard Mr. Krishna Mohan Murari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, junior counsel to Mr. Binay Kirti Singh, representing for the Bihar State Electricity Board. Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed but submits that certain other claims are pending before the respondent-authorities. Since the claim set out by the petitioner in the writ petition stands redressed, the writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner, if so advised, may pursue his remedy before the authority of the Board with regard to any other claim which may be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition - 2 - is disposed of. ( Jyoti Saran, J ) BTiwary/