IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1442 of 2006 MOSHARRAF SAYEED & ORS Versus MD.NEZAM & ORS ----------- 2. 19.11.2008 No one appears for the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court the prayer of the plaintiffs- petitioners for exhibiting a sale deed dated 22.8.1979 in evidence has been rightly rejected, inasmuch as when the plaintiffs did not choose to produce the said document alongwith the plaint in terms of Order 7 Rule 14 C.P.C. and again did not file it at the time of framing of issues in terms of Order 13 Rule 1 C.P.C., they would not have been allowed to exhibit the document even in course of deposition of their witnesses. However, when the document was not exhibited in course of deposition of the witnesses and such a prayer came to be made only after closure of evidence and infact at the stage of arguments the trial court had little option but to reject such belated prayer. It appears that infact such an application was filed only to delay the disposal of the suit which is even more unfortunate because such delay was sought to be caused by the plaintiff petitioners themselves. That being so, this application being wholly misconceived is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/