RSA No. 1976 of 2007(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 1976 of 2007(O&M) Date of Decision: January 18, 2010 Dalip Singh and another ...... Appellants Versus Raj Rani and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.R.N.Moudgil, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.R.S.Manhas, Advocate for the respondents. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This appeal has been filed against concurrent judgments of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the appellants for permanent injunction restraining the respondent No.1 from interfering in the possession of the appellants over 210 square feet of property. Learned counsel for the appellants has argued that in fact the prayer of the appellants was that the respondent No.1 should not raise any further construction over the land in dispute because possession was unauthorisedly given to her transferor Surinder Pal by a tenant. Learned counsel for the respondents states that as regards any further construction, his client is not interested in making any further RSA No. 1976 of 2007(O&M) 2 construction provided that the appellants should not be permitted to take possession except in due course of law. Learned counsel for the appellants has gracefully agreed to this caveat. Consequently this appeal is disposed of with a direction that there would be an injunction against any further construction on the property in dispute and further that the appellants may seek the possession in accordance with law. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE January 18, 2010 sunita