IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16891 of 2011 SAHEB SAH, S/O-NATHUNI SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 27.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. It would appear from perusal of the impugned order that it is a case of misuse of privilege of bail but submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was in judicial custody in Faizabad district from 03.06.2008 to 06.10.2010 and that was the reason he could not appear before the learned court below. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Bettiah in connection with Yogapatti P.S. Case No. 177 of 2005 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 109 A of 2006. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)