IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9087 of 2009 Between: Irukalala Parameswari Ammavari Temple, Moolapet, Nellore Town & District Rep. by its Executive Officer. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superitendent of Police, S.P.S.R. Nellore District, Nellore. 2 The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nellore Rural, Nellore. 3 The Station House Officer, Nellore Rural P.S., Nellore. 4 Sk. Munaf, S/o. Sk. Ali Saheb, R/o. Petrol Bund, Irukala Paremeswari, Ammavari Temple, Moolapet, Nellore. 5 Eragla Venkta Muni, S/o. Nagamuni, HIndu, R/o. D.No. 2/131, Rajavari Street, Mulapet, Nellore. 6 Eragala Prasad, S/o. Seshaiah, Hindu, R/o. D.No. 2/132, Rajavari Street, Mulapet, Nellore. 7 Atturu Muni Shankar, S/o. Munindranat, Hindu, R/o. D.No. 20/130, Rajavari Street, Mulapet, Nellore. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. S.RAVIRAJ FOR MR.V.T.M.PRASAD Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3:AGP FOR HOME ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner feeling aggrieved by the inaction of the police authorities of Nellore District in protecting the property from respondent Nos.4 to 7. On 05.01.2009, this Court while ordering notice before admission, passed the following order. “It is the case of the petitioner that it filed a suit in O.S.No.717 of 2008 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore seeking injunction and obtained temporary injunction against respondents 4 to 7 herein. It is its further case that respondents 5, 6 and 7 herein filed W.P.No.27904 of 2008 alleging that the petitioner-temple is trying to evict them from the subject lands, wherein ultimately status quo existing as on 23.12.2008 was granted by this Court on 25.03.2009. It is the grievance of the petitioner that in spite of the orders of civil Court and this Court, respondents 4 to 7 are trying to put an iron sheet shed in the land in an extent of Acs.2.62 in Survey Nos.172 and 183 of Bit-I of Kothuru Grampanchayat, Nellore belonging to it and even though they lodged a complaint to respondent No.3 on 24.04.2009, no action has been taken. It is also stated that the petitioner is unable to get any orders of police protection from the civil Court, as the Presiding Officer is on leave. Hence, the present writ petition. A counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the third respondent, the Station House Officer, Nellore Rural P.S., stating that he has not received any complaint whatsoever from the petitioner-temple and therefore, he did not take any action. In view of the peculiar circumstances, respondents 1 to 3 are directed to see that there is no law and order problem in the vicinity. The petitioner is at liberty to move the civil Court for further orders. If there is any law and order problem, respondents 1 to 3 are at liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law.” Having regard to the nature of the grievance of the petitioner, I am of the view that the interim order reproduced above is comprehensive in nature and will meet the ends of justice. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the said order. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 3rd JUNE, 2009. kvni