IN THEHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:20.06.2008 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.CHOCKALINGAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.PALANIVELU HCP.NO.849 OF 2008 Thilakavathy ...Petitioner Vs. 1.State rep. By The Inspector of Police Periapalayam Village Thiruvallur District, 2.TheDeputy Superintendent of Police, Uthukottai, Thiruvallur. 3. The Superintendent of Police, ThiruvallurDisrict.. ...Respondents This Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India for a direction directing the respondents 1 to 3 to produce before this Court, the detenu, Petitioner's husband Mullaivendan, Son of Purushothaman who is illegally detained by the 1st respondent and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.A.M.Rahamath Ali For Respondents : Mr. Babu Muthu Meeran Additional Public Prosecutor. -------- O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by M.CHOCKALINGAM,J) The grievance ventilated by the petitioner herein is that she is the wife of the alleged detenu who is aged about 26 years, that her husband was taken into custody by the Inspector of Police, Periyapalayam Police Station, the first respondent herein https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ on 16.6.2008, that from the said date onwards, his whereabouts are not known nor he has been produced before any Court of law. Under such circumstances, she was compelled to approach this Court for the issuance of a habeas corpus. 2. In answer to the above contention, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State, on instructions, from the first respondent herein who is present before this Court viz., Inspector of Police, Periyapalayam Police Station, would submit that on 16.6.2008 at about 15 hours, the alleged detenu viz.,Mullaivendan has snatched 3½ sovereigns from the aunt of the complainant , that a complaint has been registered on the same day at 16 hours,that a case has been registered against the detenu in Crime No.451 of 2008 for the offence under Section 392 and after the case was registered, at the time of investigation, he was arrested on 19.6.2008 and he will be produced before the Judicial Magistrate, Uttukottai on this day i.e.,20.6.2008. Under such circumstances, the above petition has got to be dismissed. 3. From the submissions made by the learned Additional Public prosecutor, it is quite clear that a case has been registered by the respondent police for robbery against the detenu, the husband of the petitioner and he was arrested on 19.6.2008 and he will be produced before the Judicial Magistrate, Uttukottai. Hence, the application does not require any consideration. The Habeas Corpus Petition is disposed of. VJY Sd/- Assistant Registrar / True Copy / Sub. Assistant Registrar To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Uttukottai. 2.-do- Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvallur. 3. The Inspector of Police Periapalayam Village Thiruvallur District, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.TheDeputy Superintendent of Police, Uthukottai, Thiruvallur. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur Disrict.. 6. 6. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Ck (co) dv/3.7. HCP.No.849 OF 2008 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/