§§€§ii§ 3E m THE. HIGH coun-r OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. (S) No. M Qro 7)’ -/201Q / Ku Sandhya Namdev D/o Late Shri “Umakant Namdev Aged 35 years posted \at village Dam' P H Ngs 34 R/o Qtr No F— 1127, CSEB 'West, CSEB Colony Jailaon, g Tahsil Katghora District Korba CG VERSUS '/ 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretai‘y ,Department Of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2; District Collector Korba (C.G.) Sub—divisionél OfHcer (Revenue), District Katghora (C.G.) PETITIONER r RESPONDENTS 3t. / / 4. Tahsildar, Tahsil Katghora District Korba, (CG) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT‘ I-N 'DHE NATURE OF ‘MANDAMUS PROHIBITION CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER 'DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER m- $ W , " W s HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 4863 of 2010 PETITIONER Ku. Sandhya Namdev. VERSUS RESPONDENTS I : . State ofChhattisgarh&Others. :WRIT PETITJON QNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ' SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K: Agnihotrh J. Present: $hri Sunil Otwani, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Deputy Government Advocate with Shri P.K.Bhaduri, Pane] Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER (GRAD (Passed on 16m day of June, 2011) Leafned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that the petitioner has already continued at Patwari Halka No. 34, Ra.Ni,Ma, Katghora, for about ten months on account of interim order granted by this Court 28.08.2010. The State/respondents may be granted liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in View public interest and administrative exigency. Shri Bhaduri further submits that the State/respondents shall not insist upon compliance of the impugned order dated 27.07.2010 (Annexure P/S) in respect of the petitioner. At this stage, when no effect could be given to the impugned order dated 27.07.2010 (Annexure P/5) on aceount ofvthe interim order dated 28.08.2010, thus, it is not necessary to go into legality and validity of the aforestated impugned order. 1n view of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Interim relief granted on 28.08.2010 is vacated. s/