1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Family Court Appeal Stamp No.13248 of 2008 Mrs. Renuka Rameshchandra Modi Appellant Vs. Shri Rameshchandra Prabhulal Modi and ors. Respondents Ms.Anulata Saudankar Advocate appointedfor appellant. Appellant also present in person. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & D.G.KARNIK,JJ. January 6, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard Ms.Saudankar, the learned appointed Advocate. This Family Court Appeal arises from the order dated 18/10/2007 passed by the Family Court at Mumbai in Petition No.M.A.71 of 2007 which came to be dismissed as not pressed. It appears that the present appellant had applied to the Family Court for variation / to cancel the Consent Terms and the Family Court noted that the Consent Terms were presented before the High Court and, therefore, the Family Court has no powers either to recall or modify the Consent Terms. 2. The appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to take appropriate motion in Writ 2 Petition Nos.4919 and 4921 of 2004 before this Court. 3. Hence leave granted and the appeal is disposed as withdrawn with liberty. (D.G.KARNIK,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)