IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51703 of 2008 SUNITA DEVI W/o Sri Arun Kumar Singh Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 15.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that upwards ligature mark is found on the neck of the deceased and there is no reliable witness to state the illicit relation of the petitioner with deceased’s husband and her status was also paralleled to the deceased but all the doubts raised have no legs to stand as ligature mark is followed by other injuries. Breaking of any bolt can be managed any time before coming of others or the I.O., but injuries other then the ligature mark belies all the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner and if it was a case under Section 302 of I.P.C. then also at this stage, there appears no material at all to doubt the prosecution case, basing which petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Accordingly, the application is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)