1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3563 OF 2005 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.)NO.17315 OF 2005 Karnatakad State Road Transport Corpn. ..Applicant. V/s. Satyawan Shamrao Bhosale ..Respondent. Mr.C.M.Lokesh for applicant. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : JANUARY 12, 2006. DATE : JANUARY 12, 2006. DATE : JANUARY 12, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Lokesh, counsel for the applicant. Explanation offered in paragraph 2 and 3 of the application by no stretch of imagination can be said to be sufficient cause. Except mentioning dates as to how the file moved from one table to another, no justification is given as to what prevented the concerned office to handle the file with utmost dispatch-which eventually resulted in inordinate delay of "two years and 75 days". As mentioned earlier, explanation offered is not sufficient cause. This application should fail. Hence dismissed. 2. The amount which is deposited by the appellant in this court be transferred to the trial court to the suit account so that the same can be 2 withdrawn by the respondent.