1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI.APPLICATION NO.4209 OF 2008 (SMT. SHANTA MURLIDHAR RATHI...Vs.. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri S.G.Loney, Advocate for Applicant. Shri K.S.Dhote, A.P.P. for Respondent/ State. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : DECEMBER 17, 2008. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused reply filed on behalf of the respondent/ State. 2. The applicant is a handicapped Treasury Officer, who claims to have not at all approved any incorrect bills. The learned A.P.P. contests this statement and submits that about 29 bills are yet to be traced out, which may have been passed by the applicant. However, since co-accused, another Treasury Officer, has been bailed out by an order dated 16th December, 2008 in Criminal Application No.4183/2008, no distinction need be made in case of the applicant. 4. In view of this, following order is passed. The applicant be released on his furnishing P.R.B. in Rs.One Lac with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate 2 sum of Rs.One Lac on the following conditions : a) The applicant shall furnish list of her assets, which the State shall tally with the return of his properties, which must have been filed ; b) The applicant shall file an undertaking that she shall not transfer any of these assets till trial is over, without leave of the trial Court ; c) The applicant shall furnish information in respect of his bank accounts and shall keep on informing the Investigating Officer or Prosecutor, incharge of the case, of the transaction she undertakes from these bank accounts, so that should need arise the Prosecutor or Investigating Officer could apply to the trial Court to have the accounts seized. 5. The entire property of the applicant would be liable to be dealt with as the property in the case at the end of the trial. 6. The application is disposed of accordingly. 7. Hamdast granted. JUDGE 3 RR.