S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 74/2008 (Niksar alias Sonu & ors. Vs State of Rajasthan) Date of Order: February 04, 2008] HON'BLE MR. H.R. PANWAR, J. Mr. Rajendra Charan, for the petitioners. Mr. L.R. Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. Having regard to all the facts and circumstances of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Niksar alias Sonu S/o Semual B. Dass, (2) Dharmendra alias Kohali S/o Gurmeet Singh, and (3) Raman Rana S/o Jogendra Pa aias Farznand be released on bail in FIR No. 400/2007, Police Station, Kotwali, district Sri Ganganagar, provided each of them executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. mcs (H.R. PANWAR), J. S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9/2008 (Bhura Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of Order: February 04, 2008 HON'BLE MR. H.R. PANWAR, J. Mr. J.S. Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr. L.R. Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner himself suffered numerous injuries at the hands of the complainant party including the injuries on the head. Learned counsel has shown me the papers of the cross-case against the complainant party and the injury report, wherein petitioner Bhura Lal has suffered various injuries apart from the injuries on the fronto-parietal region at the hands of the complainant party. In the instant case, the injury is on the elbow of the injured. Having regard to all the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner himself suffered more injuries including the injury on the vital part of the body, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Bhura Lal S/o Teka Prajapat be released on bail in C.R. No. 253/2007, Police Station, Railmagra, district Rajsamand, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R. PANWAR), J. mcs S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.6286/2007 (Raghuveer Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of Order: February 04, 2008 HON'BLE MR. H.R. PANWAR, J. Mr. A.K. Rajvanshy, for the petitioner. Mr. L.R. Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor. Perused the impugned order and the Challan papers. The allegation against the petitioner is that he identified a person who was ultimately found to be not the correct person. The offence against that person is that of cheating which is triable by a Magistrate. Having regard to all the facts and circumstances of the case and the oral arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Raghuveer S/o Sugana Ram be released on bail in FIR No. 223/2007, Police Station, Taranagar, district Churu, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R. PANWAR), J. mcs S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.6278/2007 (Abdul Hakim Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of Order: February 04, 2008 HON'BLE MR. H.R. PANWAR, J. Mr. Ramesh Purohit, for the petitioner. Mr. L.R. Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. The petitioner is facing trial for the offence under Section 8/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. The petitioner was granted the bail but he failed to appear before the trial Court on 9-4-2007. The petitioner was arrested and remanded back to judicial custody in another case hence he could not appear before the trial court. He moved a bail application before the trial court which came to be rejected by the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if the petitioner is granted the bail, he will continuously appear before the trial Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and will not repeat the bail jump. Having considered the totality of the facts and circumstances and taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Abdul Hakim alias Bhuriya S/o Ayub Khan be released on bail in Criminal Case No.394/2006 pendng before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhilwara, provided he furnishes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.5000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R. PANWAR), J. mcs S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.6272/2007 (Shanker Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of Order: February 04, 2008 2007 HON'BLE MR. H.R. PANWAR, J. Mr. Ganga Ram for Mr. Sanjay Mathur, for the petitioner. Mr. L.R. Upadhyaya Public Prosecutor for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the injury report. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the injuries are on the 3rd, 4th and 5th fingers of the hand. The investigation has been completed and Challan has been filed. Having regard to all the facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view that the injuries sustained by the injured are on the fingers, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Shanker S/o Jewa Hadat Meena be released on bail in FIR No. 334/2007, Police Station, Bichhiwara, district Dungarpur, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R. PANWAR), J. mcs