1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Appli. No.1106/2008 (Baljeet Kaur Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : March 18, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.H.S.S.Kharlia, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the police investigation diary. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the land for which the dispute arose between the parties, has been purchased by a registered sale-deed, which is in favour of petitioner Baljeet Kaur. On careful perusal of the statements of Girdawari, the prosecutrix and Pooja aged 14 years, in my view, there are serious allegations against the petitioner, her presence has been shown and specific overt act has been assigned to her including keeping two ladies in a room and watching on them and there is allegation of rape against co-accused. In the 2 circumstances, therefore, it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The bail application filed by the petitioner under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-