^^: :C—78 ^^69 0^ 'S^ -^WW^, W^\W\<D, f®l<y11-H>^< '^rowgwra?""""""" ""'"""TH^200 ^n^f TI^R' (yit^q<^) ^I^l ^I f^^Jch WT ^IT^l^^W ^wlw ^fcf ^^^ Writ Petitibn IS\ No.478/2009 PETITIONBRS 4. RESPONDBNTS GajbaJl^ Executi^ NarharF|ur, Suspens Directoilate, Caste R/o Go^|iadpi Pardeshti MarkaHt, Executife Charamla, Suspen<| Directoslate Caste R/o. Radha aged Executi^< suspen^: Schedule Develop|nient R/o Vlllagc Distdctl Bharat aged 4bout Execufit^< (under Schedul Ci^il State ofl Schedi4< Developjment Chhatti^garh TUOTT 1»»TTTTtfnkMTTMniP.O AOTTrfTT Gftl^t<n4<1 TTR^f ^ "fe^ <P»l^l< ^'3fRW37Tt?T Goverd4aoi GajbaUa, S/o Late Itwad Ram aged about 53 years, Chief ^e Officer, Jaapad Panchayat, District Kaaker (CG) (Under |»ion) Presentiy attached at Schedule Tribe aad Schedule D^velopment Department, Raipur (CG) Gk>4mdpur Kanker (CG) Ram Markam, S/o Late Satauram, aged about 53 years, Chief Officer, Janpad Paachayat, District Kaiiker (CG) (Under ^ion) Presentiy attached at Schedule Tribe and Schedule D|evelopment Department, Raipur (CG) Liaes Gariabaadh, Raipiir (CG) ^aat Kar, S/o Shri Kripa Siudhu Kar, ap^but 46 yeas, posted as Chief Executi^e Officer, Kanker (CG) (under ^ion), attached at Directorate, Tribe and Schedule Caste Department, Raipur (CG) Vpl^e Charbhafha, Post: Ricokala, IMaliasamund (CG) |Raiu Netaai, S/o Bhemsen Netaai ^bout 52 years posted as Chief |/e OfHcer, Antagarh Kanker (CG) jsuspension) attached at Directorate, le Tribe and Schedule Caste Raipur(CG) Develoijnient Deparfaaient, Versu* Chhattisgarh, through the Secretaiy, Tribe aad Schedule Caste Department, Mmistory of garh, DKS Bhawan, Raipur .nk QQA r»irTWR r'nrostTTTtTTTnN €WINDIA ^—^. XI-^C—78 ^I f^iw ^?T 371^1 ^H^F '3^ "Hl<4l(n^, '^f^TT^, [«ldl-y;J,< *iWWt «»*1ic?» • • "—(^ 200 ^Tt^T 'q3RT ( ^lf^«l<^?) I^TW ^Tfi^ 3TI^l -p-1 8B: HON. 8HRI DHIRENDRA tIISHRA. J. 03-02-2009 Dr. N.K. Shukla, Sr. Adfocate wifh Ms, Ritu Mishra, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Mr. Y. S.Thakur, Dy. Ad^ Heard. lotier Grievan.ee of fhe petitio(i August 2007 on charges of Charge sheet was issued to| suspension, However, fhere is even after niore fhaii 17 moi Ofi&cer has not been appora^ consider revocation ofsuspen( in view of fhe vadous circulails rcgard, Shri Y.S. Thakur, leam^c State subraits fhat fhe. uiquiiyj In case fhe petitioners make r^ the same shall be considered of fhe State Goverument m tliis the date of receipt of fhe repre^ <=M^F<n4-s 1RT^ff "^ 'fe^ <r»l^l< "^ 3tRfR 37T^T ocate General for fhe State. is fh.at tiiey were suspended on 10th A^rcgiilarities ui prociireinent of pesticides, fhe petitioners affcer 88 days of their uo progress m fhe departmental mquiry tfhs of their suspension aiid th:e Inquiry ?d. The respondent was duty bound to sion after such a long period ofsuspension issued by ftie State Goveniinent ia fhis d Dy, Advocate General appeanng for ftie agamst tiie petitioners shall be expedited. ipresentation for revocation of suspension, 3y fhe State ia. accordaace wifh flie policy regard wifhia a period of 15 days from entation, ——— XI-6C—78 ^T^r'^if^N" 'W??3?I^T ssh^Jcb 's^ ^ww^, ^w<c, r®idi'ylj,< *n*1<"TT t»»*(|C|i "^200 ^n^?i Tra^ (^rf33^i) ^TTWTT^ 3T?^T -t> dispo^ed In view of fhe above fhe mstaat petition is representation before ftie suspension, On such repres^ shall consider and decide receipt of fhe representation.] mquiry agamst ttie petitioner^ silibmission oflearaed counsel for fhe State, ofwith liberty to fhe petitioners to file resi)ondent-State Govemnient for revocation of ^ntation beuig niade, fhe respoudent-State saaie withm 15 days from fhe date of The DiscipUnary Aufhority to ensiire fhat is expedited. tlie cbl€if<n^1^'WT^if ^ feTst <R»i<^i< "^»'3tfTO^T^T Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge