THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.8983 of 2006 ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioners questioning the inaction of the respondent-Gram Panchayat, Kukunoorpally Village in considering their representation dated 27.06.2006. Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the sons of petitioner No.1. According to them, the grand father of petitioner Nos.2 and 3, namely, Sri Ramalingaiah died intestate leaving his legal representatives, namely, Sri Narayana, Sri Eswariah, Sri Raja Mouli and Sri Veeraiah. It is stated that late Ramalingaiah was having agricultural lands in various survey numbers of Kuknoorpally Village, Kondapaka Mandal, Medak District and was also having residential houses. It is also sated that Sri Eswaraiah, father of petitioner Nos.2 and 3, died intestate, and therefore, petitioner Nos.2 and 3, being his legal heirs, are entitled to equal shares on par with other three sons of their grand father. After the death of Sri Ramalingaiah, mutations with regard to the properties in question have not been made properly and therefore, they made several representations to the authorities concerned to make suitable entries, but the same were not considered. It is further stated that Sri Narayana, who is the senior paternal uncle of petitioner Nos.2 and 3, and who was elected as Sarpanch of Kuknoorpally Village thrice, is trying to tamper with the Revenue Village Records and Gram Panchayat Records with regard to the properties in question, and to deprive them of their shares. Therefore, they made a representation dated 27.02.2006 to the respondent-Gram Panchayat not to carry out any mutations in the Panchayat Records and Revenue Records with regard to the properties in question, without conducting enquiry and without giving notice to them. However, the respondent-Gram Panchayat has not considered the said representation so far. Hence, the present writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Gram Panchayat. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that since the representation of the petitioners dated 27.02.2006 is pending consideration before the respondent, instead of this Court going into merits of the matter, the respondent may be directed to dispose of the said representation expeditiously, for which course of action, learned counsel for the petitioners also agreed. In the circumstances, without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent-Gram Panchayat to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 27.02.2006 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, expeditiously. N.V. RAMANA, J Date: 14.06.2010 va