1 386.11 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.386 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3683 OF 2010 Bhagwan @ Ganapat Devu Pawar ...Applicant Versus Senior Inspector of Police & Anr. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Abhijit Mantri for Applicant. Mrs.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.Shailesh Chavan with Mr.Abhijeet Rane for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATED:- SEPTEMBER 26, 2011. P.C. 1. Perused the application. We are not convinced that the applicant has made out sufficient cause for condoning delay of about 185 days. The averment in paragraph 5 of the application, even if taken to be as it is, there is no mention that the applicant was not present in Court when the order was passed on 2nd February, 2011 or had occasion to access the case status information available on the High Court website. No date has been mentioned as to when the applicant became aware of the fact of passing of order dated 2nd February, 2011 and when did he get in touch with the 2 386.11 present Advocate. The averments in the application are on the face of it vague. As aforesaid, no sufficient cause has been made out. Application is rejected. (P.D.KODE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)