srp. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2994 OF 2006. WRIT PETITION NO. 2994 OF 2006. WRIT PETITION NO. 2994 OF 2006. Veetrag Holdings Company Private Limited & Anr. ..Petitioners. Versus. The Slum Rehabilitation Authority & Others. ..Respondents. --- Vineet Naik a/w Agnes Baradia i/b M/s. Thakore Jariwala & Associates for the petitioner. G. D. Utangale i/b Utangale & Co., for the respondents nos. 1 to 3. Pradeep Jadhav A.G.P. for the State - Respondent no.5. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & D.G.KARNIK,JJ. D.G.KARNIK,JJ. D.G.KARNIK,JJ. DATE: AUGUST 9, 2007. DATE: AUGUST 9, 2007. DATE: AUGUST 9, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. The petitioner has approached this Court as against the Show Cause Notice issued by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority on 20th June 2005. The petitioner states that the petitioner has also filed objections and/or shown cause in view of the said notice. Learned AGP appearing on behalf of the respondent - State makes a statement that the petitioner has been given hearing, however, the order is yet to be passed. He further states that the order will be passed within a period of four weeks by giving appropripriate reasons and a copy of the said order will be supplied to the petitioner. Statement is accepted. In view of the statement, Mr. Vineet Naik states that he may be granted a leave to withdraw the petition. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of. (D.G.KARNIK, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (D.G.KARNIK, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (D.G.KARNIK, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.)