. Notice has been refused by respondent No. 1 and has not been served i i n " upon respondents No. 2 8r, 3 on the ground that they are not residing i the given address. . BErthis petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of (India petitioners have challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 17/7/ 2002 passed by 2nd Civil Judge Class-1, Dhamtari'(C.G. in civil suit No. 99A/98 whereby Court below has dismissed the application for amendment tiled on behalf of the defendantgNo. 1 after closing of evidence of plaintjh‘s. Case was pending before the Court since 19:98 before rejecting the application for amendment Court below was undger obligation to consider (gzs‘ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3658/2004 PET‘ITIONERS 1. Smt. Shanti Bai Wdfo Shri Karn‘k Ram, Both the R/ o Village Dandesara, post —Chhati, tahsil . Kurud, Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.). VERSUS 1. Shatrughan S/ o Shn' Ankalha (Plaintim Resident 'of Village Dandesara Post- 'Shtawan Ku. Nai S/o shri Kax‘tik Ram (Defendar1ts) Nai, aged about 35 Years. 2. RESPONDENTS k‘urud; Tahsil and Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.). (Defendant No. 3)‘ Bishat S/o Shri Mhettar Naiv R/o Villge Dandesara Post Chhati, tahsil and Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.). Aasham S/o Shri Mh‘ettar Nai Resident of Village Dandesara Post Chhati, tahsil and Dist. Dhamatmi (QGJ. State of Chhattisgarh through The collector‘Raipur (C. G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (Defendant No 4) ,‘ ’k (Defendant No. 5) 4. (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present: Shri R S Patel Advocate for the petmoners Shn Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal P L 1‘01 th’e State/respondent No 4 None for the respondents No 1 to 3 ORAL- ORDER '{Passed on 03/08,!2011') V‘ ) G ‘ NO onier as to costs. .. \