CWP no. 7666 of 1993 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP no. 7666 of 1993 (O&M) Decided on : 03-10-2011 Amrik Singh ....Petitioner VERSUS Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. N.D.Kalra, Advocate for the respondents MAHESH GROVER, J Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner. The previous order dated 6.9.2011 also suggests the very same situation where a statement had been made by the learned counsel for the respondents to the aforesaid effect but no one was present on behalf of the petitioner. Thus notice was issued to Mr. Amrik Singh - petitioner as well as his counsel. Office report shows that notice issued to the petitioner has not been received back served or otherwise although notice issued to the counsel has been received back served with the report that he has been informed telephonically. In view of the fact that information has been given to the counsel for the petitioner and yet he has chosen not to come to the Court to either deny or affirm this fact the Court is left with no other option but to accept the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents. That CWP no. 7666 of 1993 (O&M) 2 apart a copy of the order in which the grievance of the petitioner has been addressed has also been produced before this Court which is taken on record as mark 'A'. Hence, in view of the aforesaid, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as such. October 3, 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge