HIGH (30? TRT OF CHHAT'E‘ESGARH AT BELAS?UR 4 WRIT PETITION (C) No. 3170 £2909 PETTI‘IONER M/s. Shriram Dhamlkanta & Service Station Through its Prop. Shri Hitesh Agrawal, C/o Indu Enterprises, Jarhabhata Chowk: Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Cmiattisgarh Departmont of Industdeg- Through its, Secreiary, DKS Bhavan. Raipur Chhattiggarh 2. Shhattiégarh étate- Inhustri‘ai Development Corporation Limited. through its Managing Directof, Commefcial Compiox, Pandri, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. W’RET E‘ETYHON UNDER ARTKCLE 226 OF THE CGNgTlTUTlON OF EJDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agnjhotri, J Present: Shri Ankit Singhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Alok Bakshi, Government Advocate for the State. Shri Ayaz Naved, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. ORDER ORAL (Passed on i3 day of Euly, 2009) Learned oounsei appearing for the petitioner, on instmotions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition 013 merits at this stage. However, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before the respondent-authorities and in turn, the respondents may be directed to consider and decide his representation as expeditiously as possibie. 2. Shri Ayaz Naved, learned counsei appearing for the respondent No. 2 submits that in the event, a fresh representation is made, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possibie, preferabiy Within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of‘the representation. '3. in View ofthe ciear statement made by learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing remains to be adjudicated. v4. Consequentiy, the petition stands disposed of. i Sd/- ! Satish K. Agnihotri Judge