THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 28152 OF 2008 Dated 8th July, 2010 Between: P.Shivaraj Sampathy and another …Petitioner And All India Council for Technical Education and Four others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : None appeared Counsel for respondent No.1 : Sri K.Ramakanth Reddy Counsel for respondents 2 and 3 : None appeared Counsel for respondents 4 & 5 : Sri P.Sri Harsa Reddy For Sri S.Niranjan Reddy The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ and direct the 1st, 2n d and 3rd respondents herein to take necessary action against the 4th respondent Society under the provisions of AICTE Act.” On 05.07.2010, no one appeared for the petitioners when the case was called. Therefore, the case was adjourned to be posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, when the case is posted under the said caption, no one appeared for the petitioners. Hence, it is reasonable to presume that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing their cause in the writ petition. The writ petition is therefore dismissed in default. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition in default, WPMP Nos.36884, 37986, 37987 of 2008 and 583 of 2009 are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 8th July, 2010 vrn