*1* CP-286-11.sxw Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO.286 OF 2011 Eureka Outsourcing Solutions Pvt. Ltd. ... Petitioner V/s. Virgin Mobile India Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. Mausi Patel, i/b. M/s. Thakore Jariwala, for the Petitioner. Mr. H. Rahman, i/b. M/s. D.H. Law Associates, for the Respondent. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 9 th December, 2011. P.C. : 1. Mentioned. Not on Board. 2. This Company Petition for winding up is not admitted. 3. It is stated that the claim of the Petitioner has been settled in the manner which has been recorded by both the sides in writing. The consent terms are duly signed by the authorized signatories of the Petitioner and the Respondent. They are present in Court. In their presence the terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. 4. Since the Company Petition for winding up is not admitted and during its pendency the claim has been settled, the Company Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed off in terms of these consent terms. 5. There will be no order as to costs. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.)