IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18610 of 2008 (1) JAGDEEP RAI (MUKHIA) & (2) MUNSHI RAI @ MUNSHI LAL RAI VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 25.8.2008 By filing mentioning slip dated 20.8.2008 it is submitted that both petitioners had been allowed anticipatory bail by this court under order dated 28.5.2008 but inadvertently the name of petitioner no.1 has not been mentioned in the order sheet. The import of order dated 28.5.2008, passed by this court in the present case is that petitioner no.1 (Jagdeep Rai Mukhia) should surrender and pray for regular bail which would be considered and disposed of on its own merit. It appears on account of inadvertence, order dated 16.7.2008 carries some error, as it records “prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no.2 is refused” though he had been allowed the same by this Court vide order dated 28.5.2008. As such, order dated 16.7.2008 is recalled and let last para of order dated 28.5.2008 be read in respect of petitioner no.2, namely, Munshi Rai alias Munshi lal Rai with a modification that his period of surrender is extended by further four weeks from today. Let this order passed in Jurawanpur ps case no. 41 of 2005 pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur be communicated to the court concerned through fax at the cost of the petitioners. Shashi. (S.P.Singh,J).