1 1348.11-ao IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1348 OF 2011 Mrs.Sunanda Kesarinath Patil. ... Appellant. V/s. M/s.Vijay Nagar Corporation and others. ... Respondents. R.S.Yadav for the appellant. Bharat Chaudhary i/b. Nivit Srivastava for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms.K.K.Soran for respondent No.3. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATED : 9th December 2011. P.C. : Notice of motion presented by the plaintiff seeking restraint order against the respondent Nos.1 and 2/ original defendant Nos.1 and 2 thereby restraining them from carrying out construction on the suit land has been turned down by the trial Court in view of the order passed on 21st October 2011. It appears that development rights were assigned to the developer way back in the year 1978 and thereafter no objection has been taken almost for the period of 25 years. The plaintiff has disputed the documents executed in favour of the defendants and contend that she has not signed the said documents and the signatures thereon were disputed by the plaintiff. The disputed documents were referred for examination of the handwriting expert. 2 1348.11-ao However, the plaintiff failed to make available contemporary handwriting for comparison with disputed handwriting and the admitted signatures. The handwriting expert was, therefore, not able to submit his definite report as regards the authenticity of the signatures. Even otherwise also, in equity, no relief can be granted on the basis of averments made by the plaintiff after lapse of 25 years. The trial Court is justified in turning the application of the plaintiff seeking interim injunction. The appeal is devoid of any substance. 2. In the result, appeal from order is dismissed. In view dismissal of appeal from order, pending civil application does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (R.M.BORDE, J.)