BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eighth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.10677 of 2011 VEERARAJ ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE BODI TOWN POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT CR.NO.331 OF 2011. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. N.RANJITH Advocate For Respondent :Mr.A.RAMAR,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/sole accused was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.07.2011 for the alleged offence punishable under Section 392 r/w 397 and 506(ii) IPC , in Crime No.331 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2.The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely impliacted in this case under Section 392 r/w 397 and 506(ii) IPC and he was remanded to judical custody on 19.07.2011 and the investigation is considerably over and hence, he seek for enlargement on bail. 3.Refuting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner waylaid the de-facto complainant and demanded money for consuming liquor and the petitioner snatched Rs.300/- and Cell-phone from the de-facto complainant. He further submits that there are 11 cases are pending against the petitioner and he is having bad antecedent and in some of the cases he was convicted and imposed fine and in some of the cases are pending aginst him and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides that the alleged occurrence took place on 19.07.2011 and he got red- handedly while he was snatching Rs.300/- and cell-phone from the de-facto complainant and he was arrested and remanaded into judicial custody on 19.07.2011 and the investigation is coniserably over and even though 11 cases are pending against the petitioner, in some of the cases are ended conviction and imposed fine and in some of the cases are pending since he is in jail from 19.07.2011, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with stringent conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bodinaickanur, and on further condition that the petitioner is directed to stay at Madurai and signed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai daily at 10.30 a.m. 02.15 p.m and 05.30 p.m. For a period of two months. Sd/- 08/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, MADURAI 2.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BODINAICKANUR 3.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THENI DISTRICT 4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 5.THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRIOSN, MADURAI 6.THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE BODI TOWN POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. N.RANJITH Advocate SR.No.30635 rl/8c – 12.9.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10677 of 2011 Date :08/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/