IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21318 of 2009 MANOJ YADAV, SON OF PULKIT YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SURMAHA, P.S. SAURBAZAR, DISTRICT SAHARSA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 09.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. The case is of bank dacoity. It is stated that the petitioner has been named by one of the co-accused Nirmal Yadav. It is also stated that except extra-judicial confession of the said co-accused, there is no material against the petitioner showing his involvement in the crime. Nothing has been stated in the petition with regard to the antecedent of the petitioner. The order of the learned court below also does not show as to whether petitioner had any criminal antecedent or not. In the circumstances, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul is directed to make enquiry with regard to criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case the court finds that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent whatsoever, he shall enlarge petitioner (Manoj Yadav) on bail - 2 - on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to his satisfaction in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No.95/05. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)