(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 747 OF 2011 Annapurnabai Shahasingh Patil, Age : 65 years, Occupation : Agriculture and Household, .. Petitioner R/o. Pimprala, Taluka and Dist. : Jalgaon. (Original defendant) versus Shri Mangalsingh Tukaram Patil, Age : 48 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Hingane N.K., Taluka : Jamner, .. Respondent District : Jalgaon. (Original plaintiff) ....................... Mr. M.M. Bhokarikar, Advocate, for the petitioner. ........................ CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 2ND FEBRUARY 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. The application by the petitioner / defendant, raising challenge to pecuniary jurisdiction of trial court has been (2) rejected after noticing that property, in relation to which the relief was sought, was agricultural land and hence as per provisions of Section 6, Clause "v" of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959, the court fee payable was on valuation at 200 times of the annual assessment. The relevant aspects are looked into by the trial court. There is no jurisdictional error. 2. Mr. M.M. Bhokarikar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, has tried to urge that the gift deed on the basis of which the petitioner has acquired title, has not been questioned and if it is questioned, the provisions of Section 6(iv)(ha) of the Bombay Court Fees Act are attracted. 3. When no relief in relation to gift deed is claimed, the argument is misconceived. The suit, as drafted, needs to be looked into and errors therein are not relevant for the purpose of working out valuation. 4. In the result, the petition is dismissed. No costs. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp747