IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28964 of 2010 SHYAM BIHARI SINGH & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 09.08.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel appearing for the State. The petitioners being the circle inspector and revenue clerk are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 166, 167 and 466 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that in spite of stay order with regard to mutation of the name of Dilip Kumar and Rang Nath Sharma in mutation appeal, the petitioners recommended for mutation of name of aforesaid two persons. It is contended on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners that they were not aware about the stay order which was passed several years ago. Moreover, recommendation was made under misconception as the stay order was never produced before the petitioners and now the petitioners have been transferred. From perusal of the complaint, it does not appear when the stay order was passed and the informant does not claim to have produced the stay order 2 before these two petitioners. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, Shyam Bihari Singh and Santu Kumar Ram, be released on bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 732 of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. U.K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)