1 Cri.A.5344.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5344 OF 2011 Jaypal Darbarsing Girase, R/o Vani, Tq. Shindkheda District Dhule. ...APPLICANT. VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, and another. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.A.B.Girase,Advocate for Applicant. Shri.B.V.Wagh,A.P.P for Respondent-State. Shri.Abhishek Kulkarni,Advocate holding for Shri Y.B.Bolkar,Advocate for original complainant. ... CORAM: R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 23.12.2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel on both sides. 2. The applicant is arrested in connection with Crime No. 88 of 2011, registered with Dondaicha Police Station District Dhule for the offence punishable under sections 395, 143, 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 37(1)(3) 135 of the Bombay Police Act. 2 Cri.A.5344.11 3. The applicant has sought bail. The applicant along with two other accused have filed an application being Criminal Application No. 5686 of 2011,for quashing of FIR. The complainant Mahendra Vasant Choudhari has filed affidavit in-reply. Before this Court a copy of other Criminal Application and affidavit in-reply filed by the complainant are filed. 4. I have perused affidavit in-reply. The complainant has indicated that parties have decided to keep the peace. The said complainant has submitted at the end of his affidavit in reply that application should be allowed. 5. This Court was informed that the Criminal Application NO. 5686 of 2011 was entertained by the Regular Court and statements of the applicant as well as complainant i.e. respondent No. 3 are recorded and respondent-State is called upon to put up their stand in the matter. Now, the said Criminal Application is adjourned to 12.01.2012. 3 Cri.A.5344.11 6. After having heard the learned Advocate on both sides and perusing the papers, even though it can be observed that prima facie case is made out against the present applicant, in the wake of Criminal Application for quashing the FIR and Looking to the affidavit in-reply filed by the complainant thereby consenting for quashing of the said FIR, it is apparent that complainant has no grievance against the present applicant. In all probabilities the request for quashing will be granted. In view of this development and in peculiar facts and circumstance, I am inclined grant bail. Hence, following order is passed. (i) The application for bail is granted. (ii) The applicant is hereby ordered to be released on bail, in connection with Crime No. 88 of 2011, registered with Dondaicha Police Station District Dhule, in the sum of Rs.15,000/-(Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with one surety 4 Cri.A.5344.11 in the like amount. The applicant shall execute P.R. bond of sum of Rs.15,000/-(Rupees Fifteen Thousand). (ii) The applicant shall report to the concerned Police Station on every Saturday between 11.00 a.m. to 4.00 p. m. till Criminal Application No. 5686 of 2011 is decided. (iii) A copy of Criminal Application No. 5686 and reply thereof are taken on record, which are tendered by the learned Advocate Mr. A. B. Girase for the applicant. . The Criminal Application stands disposed of in the above terms accordingly. Sd/- [ R.Y.GANOO, J. ] MTK 5 Cri.A.5344.11