1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5328 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.5328 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO.5328 OF 2008 Anant Madhav Vaidya & Ors. .. Petitioners. vs. The Circle Officer, Mudshingi, Tal. Karveer & Ors. .. Respondents. Ms. Prabha Badadare i/by P.R. Arjunwarkar for Petitioner. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP., for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6. CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & CORAM: J.N. PATEL, & S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE: 1ST DECEMBER, 2008. DATE: 1ST DECEMBER, 2008. DATE: 1ST DECEMBER, 2008. P.C. . The petitioner has approached this Court with a grievance that the petitioners are not being given a hearing as regards their objections or to appear before them for the purpose of an enquiry. We fail to understand why the petitioners are required to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court for such a simple matter. It will be in the interest of the petitioner that he attends the office of the Circle 2 Officer and assist him in conducting the enquiry rather than avoiding the same and inviting an adverse order. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the notice under challenge shows the date as 10.2.1987 and that the notice dated 23.6.2008 calls upon the petitioners to appear before the Circle Officer on 30.6.2007. This may be a typographical mistake which can be brought to the notice of the concerned officer by attending the matter on the given date of the current year and we do not think that the concerned officer would not realise the mistake on his behalf in discharging the same and granting an opportunity to participate in the enquiry. With these observations, the petition is dismissed. (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (J.N. Patel, J.) (S.J. Kathawalla, J.) (S.J. Kathawalla, J.) (S.J. Kathawalla, J.)