1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. WRIT PETITION NO.4668 of 1996 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | Mr. T.K. Prabhakaran, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 28th April, 2010 1 It is stated that the industry is already closed and as such, the question raised in the petition does not assume to be of any importance. The order impugned in the petition is in respect of extending coverage under the provisions of the Employee Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act. In view of the subsequent development as informed by the counsel appearing for the petitioner, the grievance raised in the petition does not require any consideration. 2. Petition, therefore, stands dismissed. Rule is discharged. No costs. grt/- ( R. M. BORDE, J.) 2 grt / office /wp