{1} FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12597 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra Vs. Suresh M. Borude IN FA ST NO.21872/2003 Office notes, office memorandum of coram, appearances, court’s order or directions and Registrar’s order. Court’s or Judge’s orders Smt. R.R.Mane, AGP for the State / applicant. *** Coram : K.U.Chandiwal, J. Date: 29th June 2009. 01- Heard learned AGP. 781 days delay caused in seeking to challenge the order dated 23/03/1993, is the subject of controversy. The proposal was sent for approval. The record illustrate, copy application was made in time, the office of Government Pleader received different chart from the office of SLAO and the Court fees on 22nd July 2004. Even in spite of such notice, the appeal is not filed in time The delay is not properly explained. Incidentally the order under challenge illustrate the land block No.245 to the extent of 33 R came to be acquired. SLAO granted Rs.3,200/-, the Court made it to Rs.9,900/- the difference payable was Rs.6,796/- with other statutory benefits. {2} 02- The delay being not explained, the respective applications for condoning the same is rejected. Appeal rejected. [K.U.CHANDIWAL] JUDGE /mda/0609/ca12597.08