1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.1161 OF 2010 Anagram Capital Ltd. ...Petitioner vs. Mr.Ghanshyam n.Godhwani. ...Respondent --- Mr.Vikas Singh i/b. Zohra J.Shaikh & Mujahid H.Mulla, for Petitioner. --- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH, J. DATED: 24th June,2011. P.C.:- 1. Heard. The learned Arbitrator has recorded a finding of fact on the basis of the ledger maintained by the Petitioner itself that there was no debit in the account of the Respondent, still the Petitioner was claiming for additional amount. It is further recorded that the Respondent had instructed the Petitioner to square of his account on 15.5.2009, but contrary to this instruction the Petitioner continued 2 to carry on trade in its account. The learned Arbitrator, therefore, calculated the amount that was due to the Respondent as on 15.5.2009. In my opinion, the Award made by the Arbitral Tribunal does not require interference at the hands of this Court because it is based entirely on the findings of fact which have been recorded by the learned Arbitrator on the basis of the record maintained by the Petitioner itself. The petition is, therefore, rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) ---