^3 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ijON'BLEMR. SATISH K. AGMHOTRI, J. WRIT PJ;T!TIQN(S) No,i9Uot2007 Smt. Ramiya Bai W/o. Shri Subhash Ram Aged about - 27 years, R.'o. Village Kamari (Lohradand) P.S. - Shankargarh Tah. Kusmi Distt. Surguja (C,G.) MilEi'.N' 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary Department of Women and Child Dsvelopment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Child Developmeat Raipur (C.G.) 3. Tbe Collector, Ambikapur Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Women and Child Development, Ambikapur (C.G.) 5. The Project Officer, Women And Child Development Shankargarh, Distt. - Surguja (C.G.) Panchayat Shankargarh Distt.- Surgwa (C.G.) 7. Kiran Yadav W/o. Vinod Yadav Aged about - 27 years R/'o. Village Silfili, P.S, - Shankargarh, Tahsil Kusmi, Distt. Surguja (C.G.). Shri Rahul Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State/r to5. ^. ar (Passed on 30m ofMareh, 1. Lsarned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the appoin'tment of the respondeat no. 7 on the post of Angan Badi Worksr is contraty to the scheme, as the respondent no. 7 is not living the povertv' line and fiirthsr she is not. livmg in the village wherefor she was appointed as Aungan Badi Worker. The petitioner is bettsr qiialiiied tfaan the respondent no. 7 as the reo'uirement for appomtment of Angan Badi v.'orker is Class 8 passed and preiereBce sfeouid b.s giveti to those who are Class 8 passed. Leamsd counse] turther submits that the name of the respoiident no. 7 was a!so not recommended bv the scrutinv committee. 2. Be that as it may, the Coiiector, Surguja (Ambikapur) is directed to examme the aiiegation made by the pe'tmoner and pass appropriate order in acc.ordance witli law as per Anganbadi scheme, within a period ofsix weeks froiii the date ofreceipt ofthis order. 3. In view ofthe above, this writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge AllHI