@ C/f‘ k a’vL- Single l Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP (SI NO a\%\ /2011 PETITIONER Shlvlal S1n§gh Dhurve S/ o Late Balrag Slnghl aged about 61 years ' Occupatlon Govt Servant Posted as Head Master, Prlmary School Paraswara, Block Pandariya, District Kabirdharn C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENTS «1;<s"tétte of C.G. through the Secretary V School Education‘ Department ,‘ DKS Bhawan Raipur, C.G. / 2. The District Education Officer, / Kawardha, District Kabirdham C.G. 3. The Joint Director Treasury and Pension, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham C.G. .WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE. 226 OF THE_ CONSTITUTION OF' INDIA ‘ FOR ISSUE OF ‘AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATU RE 7 OF. MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. H11GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 2181 0f2011 l WRIT PETITION UNDER ARFILLE 226 Oh IHE (,ONSTITUHON Ob WDIA SB Hon’ble Shn hatlsh K Agmhotrl J Present: Shri Rakesh Pandey Advocate for the petitionert Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 27 day of April, 2011) l. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, oninstructions, seeks permission of this Court to' Withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation in the light of circular dated 05.01.2011 (AnnexureP/2) issued by the Gouernment of Chhattisgarh, School Education Department. ‘ / Learned counsel appearing for other side has no obj ection. \No permission ofthis Court is required to make representation to i the respondent authorities. Thus, such direction cannot be issued. However, ifthe'petitioners make a representation to the respondent authorities, the same may be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits and perspective. \ 4. 'With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is dismissed. . » sw— ,2 Satish K.Agnihotri r t Judge MK PETITIONER Shivlal SinghEDhurve VERSUS E RESPONDENTS State ofC G & Others