IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33078 of 2010 RAJU SINGH SON OF LATE RAM NARAYAN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GOCHHI CHHAPRA, PS KANTI DIST- MUZAFFARPUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 09-09-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. It has been submitted that in the FIR there is specific mention that petitioner at the time of alleged occurrence was living in Guahati and allegations of abuses and assault on the date of occurrence, that is, 15-5-2010 are confined against three other accused. Petitioner is the husband of the victim lady and although in the FIR only general and omnibus allegations have been made by father-in-law of the petitioner regarding dowry and torture, in the divorce petition filed by the victim lady; many other details have been given regarding torture by this petitioner. Since the FIR is not by the victim lady, hence, everything was not expected to be mentioned in the FIR. Considering all the facts and circumstances, this court is not persuaded to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer is rejected. 2 This view has been taken because as the husband petitioner has special responsibilities and duties towards his wife. This order shall not prejudice the case of petitioner if he surrenders and seeks regular bail on all the grounds available to him including the ground that other accused persons have been allowed bail. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)