In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 4489 of 2009 (O& M) Date of Decision:August 11, 2009 Jagdish Chander ---Petitioner versus Mohan Lal and others ---Respondents Coram: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA *** Present: Mr.Gaurav Bhayyia,Advocate, for the petitioner *** SABINA J. Plaintiff-Jagdish Chander had filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in his peaceful possession with regard to the shop in dispute. During the pendency of the suit, an application was moved by the plaintiff for appointment of a Local Commissioner to visit the spot in dispute and submit his report with regard to the existing position at the spot Vide impugned order dated 16.5.2009 (Annexure P-1) learned trial court had dismissed the application, Hence, the present revision petition. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that no ground for interference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is made out. Admittedly, the evidence of the plaintiff was closed on Civil Revision No. 4489 of 2009 (O& M) -2- 19.3.2007 and thereafter defendants had closed their evidence on 28.7.2008. However, the case is pending since then for rebuttal evidence. Learned trial court has observed in the impugned order that the plaintiff has already brought on record sufficient evidence by examining as many as six witnesses and cannot be allowed to create more evidence by seeking appointment of a Local Commissioner. Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed. (SABINA) JUDGE August 11, 2009 PARAMJIT