IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 29TH JANUARY 2008 / 9TH MAGHA 1929 WA.No.255 of 2008(C) ------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.37271/2007 Dated 10/01/2008 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER:- ------------------------------------ MINI BABU, WIFE OF BABU.V. SANGEETHA NIVAS, AYIKKADU, CHINGOLI VIII, CHEPPAD P.O. ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-PIN CODE: 690 570. BY ADV. SRI.BOBY MATHEW SRI.E.T.MATHEW RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:- ---------------------------------------------- 1. KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN 18, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, SHAHEED JEET SINGH MARG NEW DELHI-110 016: REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. JOINT COMMISSIONER (ACAD) KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN 18, INSTITUTIONAL AREA SHAHEED JEET SINGH MARG NEW DELHI-110 016. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER REGIOINAL OFFICE, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN CHENNAI. 4. KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA (NTPC) KAYAMKULAM, CHEPPAD P.O. ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT: REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL. 5. NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION KAYAMKULAM, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT: REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL GENERAL MANAGER. R1 TO R4 BY ADV.SRI.V.V.ASOKAN R5 BY ADV.SRI.K.ANAND. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.M.JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.A.No.255 of 2008 ------------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 29th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. Based on the counter affidavit filed by the 5th respondent wherein they have stated that “it was on account of constraints of infrastructure and for maintaining academic excellence and efficiency of teachers, the 5th respondent has decided not to grant admission to additional students”, the learned Single Judge has rejected the writ petition. In our opinion, the reasoning and conclusions reached by the learned Single Judge by no stretch of imagination can be said to be either perverse or arbitrary. Therefore, the appeal requires to be rejected and it is rejected. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE MS