..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5036 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5036 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5036 OF 2004 WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5034 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5034 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5034 OF 2004 WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1382 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1382 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1382 OF 2004 Babuji Chandrarao Yedla ..Applicant/ Appellant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. . . . Mrs.Sania Miskin, Advocate for the Applicant (appointed). Mrs.A.S.Pai, APP, for the State. . . . CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED : MARCH 17, 2006. DATED : MARCH 17, 2006. DATED : MARCH 17, 2006. P.C.: . Heard learned Advocate for the accused, who has sent this application through jail. There is delay in filing the appeal. The accused is convicted for life and is undergoing his sentence. Therefore, in the circumstances, delay is condoned and Cri.Application No.5036 of 2004 is disposed of. . Appeal is admitted. ..(2).. . As far as Cri.Application No.5034 of 2004 filed for bail, is concerned S.O. two weeks. (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)