1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.06.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6815 of 2011 1.Karuppiah 2.Susaimuthu ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The State rep. by Inspector of Police, Vickramasingapuram Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 2.Salamonaraj 3.Edwardraj ... Respondents PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 1st respondent to provide adequate police protection to the life of the petitioners for cultivating the lands in Survey No.488 to an extent of 5 cents and Survey No.487 to an extent of 48 cents of Aladiyur Village by considering the representation dated 27.03.2011. For Petitioner : M/s.Hallmark Associates For Respondent No.1 : Mr.P.Kannithevan Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) O R D E R This application is filed seeking for a direction, directing the 1st respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioners. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have obtained a decree from the learned Additional District Munsif Court, Ambasamudram restraining the third respondent and one petchiammal from interfering with their possession and enjoyment of the property stated in that suit and even after obtaining decree, the petitioners, being the owners of the property, were not permitted to enjoy the property and therefore, they sought police protection. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the matter was referred to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheranmahadevi as there is a likelihood of communal clash. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the communal clashes have nothing to do in the complaint given by the petitioners and the petitioners seek only police protection for enjoying the decree obtained by them. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5. Considering the fact that the petitioners obtained decree against the third respondent for permanent injunction restraining them from interfering with their possession and enjoyment of the suit property, the first respondent is bound to give protection to the petitioners for enjoyment of the property. Hence, this petition is disposed of by directing the first respondent to give necessary protection to the petitioners for the enjoyment of the property as per the decree passed in O.S.NO.82 of 2008 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif Court, Ambasamudiram on payment of necessary charges. 6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. vsm Sd/- Deputy Registrar[Accounts] /True copy/ Assistant Registrar To 1. The Additional District Munsif, Ambasamudiram. 2. The Inspector of Police, Vickramasingapuram Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 cc to M/s.Hallmark Associates, SR.No.18706. Crl.O.P.(MD).No.6815 of 2011 Dated:16.06.2011 2P/5C RPB 28.06.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/