IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.16880 of 2011 Date of Decision: September 09, 2011 Urmil Rahi ...Petitioner Versus Director General Health Services, Panchkula & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.S.S.Khurana, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner is working as Multi Purpose Health Worker (Female). She is aggrieved against her transfer. The reason advanced is that in the transfer order, which was earlier done on administrative ground, is now cancelled without recording any reasons. No reasons are required to be recorded while directing transfer of an employee. Transfer is an incidence of service and purely an administrative act. The parties have to keep this fact into view while approaching Court to challenge the transfer orders. Normally, such matters should not be brought before the court unless it is a case which falls within the parameters of court's interference. Dismissed. September 09, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE