1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.131 OF 2008 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.328 OF 2007 Krishnabai P. Nalavade and Ors. ...Applicants. v. Santosh B. Junjunwala and Anr. ...Respondents. Mr. G.H.Keluskar, adv. For the Applicants. Mr. P.S.Dani, adv. For the Respondent No.1. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 8, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard. The application is filed by the original plaintiffs, who are the original respondents in the Civil Revision Application No.328 of 2007 to restrain the present respondents from creating any third party interest. Respondent no.1 is the original defendant and revision applicant. It appears that the respondent no.1 has already alienated the suit property in favour of the respondent nos.2 and 3. Respondent no.2 has filed affidavit undertaking that the respondent nos.2 and 3 have no intention to dispose off the property without permission of the Court. To avoid further complications, respondents, i.e., the original defendant and the third parties are hereby restrained 2 from creating any third party interest in the suit property pending the Civil Revision Application No.328 of 2007. 2 The learned counsel for the applicants, i.e., the original plaintiffs also want to make an application in the suit for temporary injunction restraining the defendants from causing obstruction in their possession. If such application is filed, the trial Court shall hear that application and pass an order on its own merits. Stay granted by this Court earlier shall not be applicable to the hearing of such application. 3 This application stands disposed off. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)