IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BHASPUR CHHATTISGARH Criminal Revision No. ! 2.2- Of 2006 i5a •R( U®H! APPLICANTS .•f^f :l.Sonu Kumar @ Munna S/o Murari Lal aged about 21 years, resident of Chiiniri , District Korba (CG). ^' . <^--' <...-;'"nJ^i/...''2. Narendra Kumar S/o Moti Lal Gupta, -.s. •''^T1'^ •fgi'^7 aged about 30 years, resident of Badi Bazar , Chirmiri, District Korba (CG). <L .w' •^" V"' VERSUS RESPONDENT State of Chhattisgarh, fhrough the Station House Officer, Police Station Anusuchit Jati Kalayan Thana, Korba (CG). MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL REVISION U/S 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 OF Cr.P.C. XI-HC-22 ^5^'B(Tq^Ef;i^ateTi®;^Riy ~, If^R ^ft^'.-V'z.z.^'2-^0^ """"""""^' aio. BT»^naitiicb f^s^' ^SII^Wgff' Tti.fMi afl^F' •gN^^i^t. 28.02.2006? '.:•:.'. .• '.. •,'•. Applicantg Sonu..KumBr @: Mynn| Shaileitdra'DutieK'Adyqcate. ; : \ ' - Shri.KE. S^Cfiandd. leaniedPand^ £eamed';counsd,forthe;applicEmts; pTe<isra.Cr.P,.No.,389/2006:foTgrant ofstay . -^ As pra^!(i, .applicstiori ,M,Cr;P" Nc '.With'Ae^consent Ofthe'parti®,this ••sfageof'admission.1 '; ' ~ '•. ' • .'^ Brieffactsare.'that-theapplicantsai-ei : (g):o^IJ>.C/ tiefbre the Special-Sessioiisl3u: .Case'No.-<58/2004 on 12..!2.3005.^'Shri1. 1. engaged by applieai'it.'Narendra Kumarhad. 12.1Z20G5'wheBIAeyrosecttaEt,'PhnI-Kuir : Ind Kunwar P.W.i'.} ^; were'eTEaniined byfhe' ..were cross-exajnineilhy pneAdvocateS}m. |? applicatien'was.filed by Shri Shailenclra'1)it - CLffO VA- L-' oflCr.P.e.:praving.for recallingthe,witnssse! :'the.:grouna that-:.;; 'SKri B,P;:Paadeyhatt ni for sppearing ori behalf pf. Narendra Komar ] ^rounsel fbr the ^applicants liad contended be Pandey, a jufuorAidTOcatadidiiotlltoeGop; effeetiwlycross-e?C8inme;the'mtn6sses'and; 'and a. fair' toial, 'an opportnnity shouSd be;; 'irisntioned aboye fer further. cross-examinat •NN^F'N"wRff ?'f®'^'ri^?^ ,. ii'sif'ii'Tan^r.,.-', and NsTendm Kuinar 'by Shii, '- iwyerfbrState/respon<fent-"; ' ::1 : iubmits 'ffiat he 46es nof want fe: .• 3S9/'2006-is iSseasse^as'.nsjt^ iatt?F!is finally .heard.todav.at the . •..: ''"^;":':.' L.' ;';: ._^'..-. fecing'trial under Sectk'n 376 (2)-; ige'(Atiecities).Kprba ia:Special :1 iE!i}endK)';J3ubey who iftad ;been i6t appeared before the- £'ourton JST^W. ;}0 and^another.witness (rosecution. Both thesewitnesses . :lB.P,IPanaey..Qn; 27,12.2005, ah., ?ey,;Adyocafe under Seetiow31] ,: 'for-fiiEthet'erogs-'examuialiotton, |<t scmght No Objection &()m:Um ~ : 'Shn: Shsilendra Dubey; leamed ^ire the trial Jud^Aat Shri.B.P. ^s of-challan and was nofaBIe fo ?' ".y'.r liierefoTe'in the inteiyst.iS^justice; : ^n'en'jfbr reeallmg;fhe. wiftissses' .1 ilai.; ''ffie teamed1 Sessipns^..lu!^e_ XI-HC-22 aii^i'®^.' few-s^I sRi(WHre(I s.^ .^^,^!m^^^^ IffElgT^KI* 'y^si2^^ ?—^••-•--"•"•"'Wt200 30^j;¥SltW:^rf?3 ^fe^-qmfftlgt^I^^ %3^<Pf;3W? -tBgt .Shfi,' B.P; Parideylha^.;cK»s-: mentipne4' above at -length and1 reealling' fhe afbTesaid^tnessesfcff^further^ss-exa^&stionmaysenctelyj^ariize^te iSt.ofttK^ justice.to TeeBll tlie^abgve inentione3 witnesses. • . HEsying ecAifeed'thsiivaI^ubiriissions.'thisTwision.deservesto'tie''. allowed. •Botte'the sppiieants^herein we^'fscnig^tiial fbr,a sericms'oSence ^nder ^Section 376 (2}^@ read.with Sect|<:m.34 :of-I.PG; B'was mentioned- ^foK-thslesme&tnal''Judse:thzttbe^i^fi c^ SfirLShailendrsDubey •I.••'••••".-. ; •". appeaTiri2ferat;eusedNaren(tfaKum8rha(|-ftotgiYen''noobjectioa"iri:faTOw ofSfcriB.P, Pandeyfdrrepresentingapplis^ntNBrendra.Eumar; : Uheter Section 311'of C^F.C,. {he'ppiut'llas ainple powere tQrecal!- . )ersc»l'wfto Aas' atready..beert..cross^!xanane3, i£this- 3ppears; to; Be ., Smce;'lhe counsel eBgaged'tiy • afplicant 'Narsndi-E! Kuraar was nbf-presen|l:^ori •I2,12.2005,'it was ju.st' and^.' 'orttni^ to-SlirtShaaendra I>dbsy Advocate for. :eiaB'jine ths proiseGutrix fbu] ' Kunwar P.W. 10 and TndKunwar'F:'W. .11.:a<!ter recaUiBgthosemtnesses.-Tfe? Teasong' m entioned, by: Sessions .Jud^ ftir i'e^ising.fo lecall'the aforesaid-two': witnesses laekjugtfficqtion, R appears^ neess^ary.fca' just•aecisipn^QftK& case.. ^ :t.hat: an .opportunity should be given to Stei ^hailendra Duteey Adyocate fbr laccused NarendrajCumar to 'furtfier Gross-exteme'the'aboveiinsntioned t-svo: iwltnesses.. .. ' .:~ ,: ' 1 . ;, ..•;' f' -':::--11,:: • '. ; •• :..:1^ (1MI.2006 passed'by:;Sessi»ns. , Korba sha!I now reeall ul punwar PW. 10 an<fInd'KtewarP.% Tl'ff^'furthCT CKiss-exaiiimstion'ly., I5&; -1 !i]ipiiuilBti XI-HC-22 VSt-WW^, ^W\'».h«W'jf. »imniw<icti ^' R.Z ^f- ^V2-'2-tz-Bu6 •—•"•••-••••••:-^^2W- . 3D^W^[ K-<i.«tl3)B?t *l)i<* titsi /"-••• Prrya Shri Shailendra DubeV AdYOCEite on am, clear that if, upon: the .date 'so fixed, l Dubey is mot •svsflabte.or uiKible fo crQSi further opportonifi'. shaB ^be giyen'^i .obserystrons, therei'isionisiiispQsed'Qf -Gt).i<4l<n<i^r'+<i+ilCTr'^^^ ^-^R ' ^siP'Ffl.an^r^ . farthgr.'aate to 'be fixed. *'& is made he. defence, Gbimsel' Shri: Shailendra i-examineths afQrssaid ivitriesses.no y : the said' purpose.' With these :v JL&- Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge IsE.lii.