IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1780 of 2004 NILAM SINGH wife of Rana Prasad Singh, resident of village- Mahe, police station Singhia, District Samastipur…. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Director, Social Welfare Department (Directorate of Integrated Child Development Services Scheme), Bihar Patna. 3. District Magistrate, Samastipur. 4. Deputy Development Commissioner, Samastipur. 5. District Welfare Officer, Samastipur 6. Incharge Child Development Project Officer, Rosera, Samastipur. 7. Hira Devi wife of Shyam Singh, resident of village- Mahe, P. S. Singhia, District- Samastipur. … Respondents. ----------- 5. 12.11.2009. Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. Prayer made in this writ application of the petitioner reads as follows:- “1. That the petition is directed for issuance of an appropriate writ, order of directions to the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of Anganwari Sevika in preference to respondent no. 7 in view of the following facts and circumstances of the case.” It is obvious from the aforementioned prayer that the grievance of the petitioner is confined only as with regard to selection and appointment of respondent no. 7 on the post of Anganbari Sevika. Such grievance of the petitioner in the first instance as per scheme and circular 2 of the Government has to be looked into by the Collector of the District but the petitioner definitely has not approached the said authority before rushing to this court. That being so, this writ application is being disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the Collector of the District and in the event such a representation is filed the Collector of the District will pass appropriate order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, respondent no. 7 as also representative of Gram Sabha. With the aforesaid observations/directions this writ application is disposed of. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)