IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 4470 of 2011 Date of decision: 26.7.2011 Mubin Khan … Petitioner versus Hukam Chand and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate, for the petitioner ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell, titled Mubin Khan v. Kirori and others. He is aggrieved with order dated 14.5.2011 passed Civil Judge(Junior Division), Palwal, by dint of which his evidence has been closed by order of the Court. Hence, this revision. Heard. Case file indicates that during the course of plaintiff's evidence, an application was filed for bringing on record the legal representatives of one of the defendants which was finally decided after about more than six months. This Court feels that no prejudice is going to be caused to the opposite side if one effective opportunity is granted to the plaintiff-petitioner to lead his entire evidence. Rules and procedure are hand-maid of justice and are meant for enhancing the same and not to scuttle it. Accordingly, this revision petition is allowed and the order under challenge is set aside. The trial Court is directed to afford one effective opportunity to the plaintiff-petitioner to conclude his entire evidence; however, subject to payment of costs of Rs.5000/- to be paid to the respondents. Keeping in view the circumstances mentioned above, this revision is being disposed of without issuing any notice to the opposite C.R. No. 4470 of 2011 -2- party. If the respondents are summoned to contest this litigation, they will have to incur huge expenses to defend this case. However, liberty is granted to the respondents that if they feel dissatisfied with this order, they may move an application to recall the same. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. July 26, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE