1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1624 of 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5692 of 2011 Harish Maganlal Baijal .. Applicant Versus The Addl. Chief Secretary, (Home), State of Maharshtra & Others ...Respondents Mr. Pratik Sekqaria i/b.L.J.Law for Applicant. Mr. Ravi Kadam, Advocate General, with V.D.Patil Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mr.S.S.Deshmukh with P.B.Gole and A.P.Chaware for Respondent No.3 CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED:- 4th AUGUST, 2011. P.C. 1. No orders are warranted on this application as the Advocate General, appearing for the State fairly states that the spirit of the Consent Order was to ensure that the proceedings pending before the Tribunal are expeditiously disposed of. 2 2. The fact that the matter has now been adjourned by two weeks does not mean that the State will ask for further time. In any case, the sur- rejoinder has to be filed within the time already granted by the Tribunal and no request for adjournment at the instance of the State may be entertained by the Tribunal unless it is expedient. 3. Advocate General submits that no observation of this nature as stated is required, as the State is more than eager for final conclusion of the proceeding. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)