CF0000060959 6-.%&7%]X /»^P^L,,.OF_PgISQ.NER^-./ ^^^Sa^^..^^ ,,. ' . Name _'s^ sionBench.(;:rin^n{' Resid^lc@^3%«~JgSS@,; ':-%?7'.o^-?^r _<?n Fatherr.s Name __..J^EBL_.,. A(3e -..^^^...-...-.^-..sent ^nced ^o ^_;3 §fi^:3;^,]^jfj3^,t<.:C... .^u...,.J..2,.^t€«-.,-.,.und er s ecti on ^.c!J2r...^^£L.<'.-i.fcy ^-^i3;2$.< S.T. . -2.3<g/<^4 ^. It is explciined to the prisoner thdt if he states or Wishes tc be represented fcy ^ l^gal prdctltioner the ^pellate Cc-urt will not proc^ec3 v?i'th the bas e £or seven dciys unless the legdl prdctitioner appears. If the legal practiticner dces ^ot appear ^ith the seven dciys he may fcs h^eard at all if the prj.scn'er ecates that the does not ^lsh tc be r spr ^s ^nt ed fcy ^legcil praictloner the Court nncLy proceed at cncewith the case id will not fce ofcliged t:o give d hea.ring to ^ny legal proct^• itioner 1who. shculd appear, 1, DdLte of cipplication fcr copy cf judg^nant : ^ja 2. Ddts o.f which ccpy received s- 2/ * 12- -^ ^' 3 . Dateon which ^pelisent ^^ , j , ^^ 4^ Mh^fehex the prisoner wished to fce i^— represented or not Yes/Afe-T" ^-^^^, !.. ;. '^xn^'^T . -S3^ Name ____^:^r^' <?^T" °^ NL-', Continued In ,'._ rOT -f^T^r Jall C^HC,^V%^ 2:.^a.—^-^-^2^^>^£—Dctt ed l^ 1 1 J ct^ Forwarded to the CHIEH' JUDICI^^L IvlA3ISTR^CE tc-gether with a copy of judgsment or or<^r passed In'the^ c fcr fcivcur of transmJLSsion to thepfoper^ppliateCourt^ 16^-r'^ Superint Ddte of cec&ipt in C.J.M's office. ^.y/f/94 Date of receipt of reccrd of acccmpany^ ^ MeiYio d»£ ^pped.l of the ^ppelliate Ccurt» 'i . .,_,_:__Dat ed ____li_^L stt./ .,. Forwarded to the _y^&U- Sf^sioti^. J^^^. ;,-^a^^^,iti~~,_». ^-'/2.<5?^^^ C-.J. .gistrate_ ^t®iR"f- D^t e of receipt of r^pelliate Court -^ XI-HC-22 ^^ ^|^|d<LI, ^Ti1y41<o, .t^TRTy 3TI^T'^T T^J<=h 3T]^T ^RW^rffcT ^. ^iAl.^s.S.'SS. q^TT^Hl^ NW^TT "I?F^ST 200 ^TT^T ^<TT8sR 'Hf?H D^ ; HON'BLB SHRI LAL CHAi HON'BLE SHRI VIJAY Kl 19-12-2005 Mrs, Kiraii Jaia, coi Mr. Ashish Shukla, Mr. Sachm Siagh R< respondent/State. Heard. ORAL l^ By this appeal, Lachctihoo has questioned fhe and order of sentence dated Judge, Jagdalpur iir Sessions Sessions Judge, after hQldiagi coininission of fhe offence und^ Code, serLtenced hnn to iindergc^ 2, The case of fhe pro] 1994 &t about 8 P.M,,the dec^ <^i^(<n^ri ^i4-i<^T ^ f^^l ^P^^K ^r ^rf^R ^T^T DBHADOO.J. AND MAR SHRIVASTAVA. J. ^nsel for fhe aecused/appeUaat lAdditlorial PubUc Prosecutor aad ^jput, PaaelLawyerforfhe [UDGMENT fhe accused/appellaiit Sodhi legality of judgment of convictlon 21-12-1995 passed by Sessions Trial No,236/94, whereby leaaied Ihe accused/appeUant guUty for ;r Section 302 of the Indian Penal iaiprisoninent for Itfe. secution, in brief, is fhat, on 15-3- ^ased Podiya came to the house of r^^fe^ XI-HC-22 3Ti^T^T f^-lich 3Tli¥T 5t?^iicti 'yRa '.'. + ^oc[ r^||q|<nq, ^frOT^, fa^l^y 'STT^T 'q^? WWTT 5h^l<=h :2l^""""""""^ 200 •f^^T' attabked Pandu along wifh. SodhLPide, P,1 the body. At fhat time, the aa Axe aiid due to aiiimosity quarrelmg wititi Podiya aad head aad laoufh/ aad as a resultj P.W.-3;Sodhi Pide iafojmied to F| fhe house of Podiya aad saw the fhe villagers about fhe iaciden( Station Kuvakonda. After regf Jaoirain Dhruv, P.W.-6 caoie prepared a Panchnaoia, Ex. F7 tlie body for post inortein fb where Dr.Haasraj Verma, P.W,-: body of Podiya aad prepared a completion of the mvestigation, Court of Judicial Magistrate Firj learaed Sessions Judge received W. -3 to sit bv the fire side to warm acctised Sodhi Lachchhoo caine with 4xi <=hMid^1T1 "^TFRTf ^ ft^ <M^K '^3Tf^W3TT^T account of fhe Mquor, started hitn with fh.e Axe on neck, ofwhich,hedied spontaaeousty. .W.-4, Sodhi HidBia, who ti7ent to ^lead body of Podiya aiid apprised aad lodged a rcport iri Police ^stenng the case, - Police Of5cer to the scene of occurrcnce aad oflfhe dead body of Podiya aad sent Health Centre, Kuvakonda, conducted post mortem on -the niorteni report, Ex.P-1. "After a charge-sheet was filed ixi tlie Class, Daatewada, wherefroin <|he case on coiGL^lttal for trial. Pri|maiY p|ost Fufet [Ti^^f^ XI-HC-22 ,'371^1 ^T 'f^ri^'STT^T 5t)+11<^ ^TT^T •^;- 't^ + ws( ^i^M-4. "^frwrs. I^R^ 3^li?f .qW^ WW11 5b^lcb ^200 'I^^T" 3:IT^T^<H^^rf^ 3. The prosecution, ia the accused, exaimned 6 witnesit of fhe accused was recorded Crimidal Procedure, ia which, ^ aad stated fhat he has been falsA 4. Leamed Sessions Ji of leamed couiisel forboth tfiel f the aecused as laentioned in order to prov^ thte chax^e agamst ^es, On the other Haad, stateiaent ulnder Section 313 of the Code of denied the prosecution evidence >^ly miplicated ia fhe crune. pai^ 5, We have heard the homicidal nature of death of leamed couhsel for the accused witnesses naBiely Sodhi Kpsi, P.1|¥, stated that, fhey witaessed th^ Verma has stated that, he condiil ^ of Podiya and he noficed 6 inju^ies fhe deafh of Podiya was homicid^l chNld^"l ^l^dT "^ feTst <M^K '^'S^THW^r idge, after hearing the ai'guinents parties, convicted aad sentenced 1 of this jiidginent clouiisel for the parties. The fact of flodiya has not been disputed by rappellao.t, Apart from that, eye- .^.-2 aad Sodhi Pide, P.W.-3, have crime and P.W. -1, Dr, Haasraj ijcted fhe post mortem on tlle body ii|ies on tiie .body, and opmed that ia nqture aad tlie mjunes were [Tft^^fe^ ~~r XI-HC-22 STT^T'^T' Rrli?b 3T1^¥I 9^^i<=t» ^f^a ^ + ^^ ^Tpn^; ^^^ fa^i<iy 3?7^T 'q^? WH^{ ^b^icb —^— 'IN^sr' "^200 31T^T '^TTW 'Cf^T sufficient ia tiie orduiary couilse of nature to cause fhe deafh. , Therefore; iti view' of fhe above Uie inedical evidence, it is est^ was hoinicidal ia nature, v . . • - 6. So far as fhe <j accused/appeUaat in. fhte cnmie| t^i<Li(cn<i1i i^TR^ff "^ Ife^t <pfl^i< '^3Tf?<R3TI^T evidence of the eye-witaesses aad LbUshed fhat, fhe deafh. pf Podiya uestion of uivolveinent of fhe in question is concenied, P.W.-2, Sodhi Kosihas stated fh.at, Sodjhi Podiya along wifh his wtfe caine to his house. At tliat tune, th|< attacked Sodhi Podiya repeatedl] on the spot and tiie accused rai^ |e aecused caine witli ao. Axe aad ^, as a result ofwhich,-Podiya died away, So is fhe evidence of Sodhi has been eUcited, which iaake| Pide, P.W.-3, who has corrobo|rated fhe evidence of Sodhi Kosi, P.W.-2, aad ia fhe cross-exami^iatlqn of fhese wifa.esses, nofhin.g fhe evidence of these witaesses unreUable or untrustwdrthy. |The evidence of Uiese witaesses stand corroborated by tlie medi Venaa, who has stated that, on [cal evidence of P.W.-l, Dr.Haiisraj 17-3-1994, he conducted the post iiiortein on the body of Sodlii I|>odiya aad found that tiiere was a s [Tit^ ^Rsi^ XI-HC-22 3^r^ ^ipb ^Tli^T 5t>^i<=h ^f^a "^\.. + ^aE[ Tznzn^-q, ^Tily^co, fa^ 1^1y 3?T^T 'q^? ^I+IC-II 5h^icb —^^- '^R^8T" '^ 200 w^r ^^TTW ^a cut mjury of fhe sharp edged below fhe nipple ia fhe size of stab wouiid on fhe occipital to.ch aad it was deep upto iojuxy, the fluid inatter of fbe b duraoiaifer aad braia were also w^apon on fhe right side of the chest |11/2 iaches x 1 iach. There was a re|gion ia fhe size of 2% itiches x ^4 # :!-;1'-' . cra|oial cavity aad ori^accpunt of ihis jraui was conmig put aiid the skuU, <fcut. There was a stab wound ia tlie fhe iajury No.2, skuU was fractured, AU fhe iajuxies nature. Therefore; ia view o| witnesses aad fhe inedical accused/ appeUant ia coBiinitti^ estabUshed aad fhe finduig of evidence. The saine does no^ Court, The injuries were uifllct^d maarier tiiat tlie skuU of fhel i=hi^(<rr>&fl<i ^i^<y?i ^ Fs^l <P!I^I< iT3Tf^P:T37T^T <fcut. nght haiid, There was a cut wc|iuid on tfae left hand, There was a stab wound in ,fhe left haad|and fherc was aa iajur^7 on fhe dorsuin ofthe left haad. He ha^ furfher stafed fhat, on account of j&kctured aad duramaiter was also we|re aati niort^ni aad honiicidal iD. ftie above evidence of the eye- elvidence, fhe iiivolveraent of the fhe inurder of Sodhi Podiya is trial Court is based on the legal requirc any uiterference by this 1 by fhe accused ia such a brutal deceased was fraetured aiid he itti^lg tbe [Tft^ ^Ra^ XI-HC-22 -STT^T^r 'f^ri^rw^ sti^w ^f^a <i-^-^ ^- G.Slagh + ^ -^^ -^pTT^r^, -S-r^^ (^<niff3< sni^r 1^ra^ ^IH^ll 9b^fich "^""'"""""""^T 200 •^^T:--"--" 37T^T '^TTW '^f^r repeatedly assaulted wifh aa Axe parts of the^body, Thercfore, mterfere the fmdmg of th^ accused/appellant for conmiissi^ 302 of the Indiaa Penal Code aiid caused 6 iajuries on th.e.vital |we do not jBiid aiiy gi'ound to trial< Court convictuig fhe bn of fhe oiffence under Section taiprisoninent forlife. The appea^ 7. In the result, the ap] is accordiagly disinissed, ^iid sentenciiig hiai to undergo is devoid of inent. Sd/.. L.C, Bhadoo Judge chl^fd4l^ ^Hdf "^ ft^ <pti^i^ '^3rt^PT3?n^T eal is Uable to bc dismissed aiid Sd/- V.K. Shrivatava Judge [Tft^ ^R^^