IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.163 of 2004 UPENDRA SINGH, S/O LATE RAMMANAK SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-HARPURA, P.S.-BIKRAM, P.O.- MOHAMMADPUR, DISTRICT-PATNA. ………………RESPONDENT-PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PATNA. 3. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, DANAPUR, DISTRICT-PATNA. 4. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, PALIGANJ, DISTRICT-PATNA. 5. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, BIKRAM, P.S., DISTRICT-PATNA. ………………RESPONDENTS-OPPOSITE PARTY’S 6. SANJIVA KUMAR, S/O SRI RAJ KISHORE SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-HARPURA, P.S.-BIKRAM, P.0.- MOHAMMADPUR, DISTRICT-PATNA. ……………PETITIONER-OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 6 21.07.2010 This review application has been filed by the private respondent in CWJC No. 12609 of 2002 for review of the order dated 27.01.2003 passed in the writ application by which the writ application was disposed of with certain directions. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the private respondent was not even noticed in the case and the orders were passed adverse to him behind his back. Writ petitioner was noticed in the review application and he appeared also through a learned counsel. However, learned counsel appearing for him is not appearing since last many dates. The order sheet of the 2 said writ application shows that on the very first date the writ application was disposed of without issuing notice to private respondent i.e. the review petitioner. In the circumstances, this review application is allowed. The order dated 27.01.2003 passed in the said writ application is recalled and the writ application is restored to its original file. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)