Civil Revision No.4126 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4126 of 2010 Date of Order: 15.03.2011 Khazan Singh ...Petitioner Versus M/s Mohindra Hire Purchase and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA Present:Mr. B.S.Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJIVE BHALLA, J (Oral) The petitioner impugns orders dated 08.09.2007 and 17.03.2010, passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Amritsar and the Additional District Judge, Amritsar, rejecting his objections. Counsel for the petitioner submits that as the petitioner is a bonafide purchaser for valuable consideration, his objections to the sale of the property to satisfy a money decree, should have been accepted. It is further submitted that as there was no entry in the revenue record that the property in dispute has been attached by the Executing Court, the petitioner was mislead into purchasing the property in dispute. Heard. Civil Revision No.4126 of 2010 -2- I find no reason whether in law or in fact to interfere with the impugned orders. An award was passed in favour of the decree holder-respondent no.1 on 27.08.2003. The property in dispute was attached by the Executing Court on 21.11.2005. The petitioner alleges that he purchased the property on 26.12.2005 pursuant to an agreement to sell dated 06.06.2005. The petitioner is a vendee pending executing proceedings and, therefore, has no right to stall execution proceedings. The petitioner, may if so advised, seek such remedy against his vendor as he may deem appropriate. Dismissed. March 15, 2011 (RAJIVE BHALLA) nt JUDGE