IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.591 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7667 of 2010 ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Suman Son of Braj Nandan Prasad resident of Village- Kamat Uncer Chitapkala Panchayat of Sherghati Block District- Gaya presently resident in Mohalla Chandchaura P.S. + Distt- Gaya .... Petitioner- Appellant/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna 2. Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Bihar, Patna 3. Director, Primary Education Bihar, Patna 4. The District Magistrate, Gaya 5. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya 6. Block Development Officer, Sherghati, Gaya 7. Panchayat Sachiv Chitap Kala Gram Panchayat, Sherghati Block, Gaya 8. Mukhiya, Chitapakala Gram Panchayat Uncer Sherghati Block, Gaya 9. Mritunjay Kumar son of Mahendra Prasad R/o Vill- Uchirwa Uncer Chitapakla Panchyat, Sherghati, Distt- Gaya .... Respondents- Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Shiva Shankar Sharma, Advocate Mr Arun Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gautam Kumar Yadav, AC to SC 3 ====================================================== 2 01-08-2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State. The writ petition has been dismissed without accepting the claim of the appellant/ writ petitioner that in the year 2005 his candidature for the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra was wrongly rejected. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that at the relevant time the tenure of appointment to the post of Shiksha Mitra was only of 11 months on contractual basis and as per Patna High Court LPA No.591 of 2011 (2) dt.01-08-2011 2 decision of the appellate authority, the appellant did not object to the appointment of others for the entire tenure of 11 months. It has further been pointed out that according to the materials, the appellant did not produce the original certificate relating to his academic qualification and his caste and on that ground the candidature was rejected in the year 2005. Considering the entire facts and circumstances, we find no merit in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed. sk (Shiva Kirti Singh, J) (Shivaji Pandey, J)