IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1089 of 2010 BICHHO YADAV SON OF LATE NUNNI PRASAD YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 22/01/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that taking into consideration the fact that the sole eye witness Shila Devi, during trial did not support the fact that the petitioner was the miscreant, who had taken away her mother, this court had granted bail to co-accused Pramod Yadav, Chandrasekhar Yadav and Manoj Yadav and the case of the petitioner stands on similar footing. Under the circumstances, let the petitioner above named, whose case is similar to the co-accused above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, IIIrd, Purnea, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 811 of 2009 arising out of Suppl. Rupauli (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 70 of 2008 (S.G.R. No. 1911 of 2008) subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the 2 petitioner. (ii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)