Crl. Misc. No. M-17269 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-17269 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.9.2011 Jeet Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharath Sarup, Dy. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. A.S. Sandhu, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Rajan Gupta, J (oral). The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.117 dated 3rd June, 2006, under Sections 498-A, 406, 506, 323 read with Section 34 IPC, registered at police station Sadar, Panipat and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-4) arrived at between the parties. Complainant/respondent No.2 is present in court. She is duly identified by her counsel. She has filed an affidavit in court today, which is taken on record as Mark 'A', wherein the factum of compromise arrived at between the parties has been admitted. She states that she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. Learned State counsel submits that since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, the State would not stand in the way Crl. Misc. No. M-17269 of 2011 2 of quashing of the FIR on the basis of compromise. The compromise is in the interest of the parties and after the matter has been resolved by an amicable settlement, no useful purpose is likely to be served with continuance of the criminal proceedings. In view of the above, the present FIR and the subsequent proceedings deserve to be quashed in the light of the decision of a Full Bench of this court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, 2007(3) RCR ( Crl.) 1052. Resultantly, the present petition is allowed, the FIR and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 27.9.2011 'rajpal'