IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26266 of 2007 Sambhu Singh, Son of late Jai Ram Singh, Resident of Village Ramchandrapur, Manjuar, P.S. Warsaliganj, District Nawada. ------- 2nd party---Opp. Party---Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. --- Opp. Party---Opp. Party 1st Set 2. Ramadhin Singh, son of late Amrit Singh. 3. Manoj Singh, son of Bibhishan Singh. 4. Gayatri Devi, Wife of Bibhishan Singh. 5. Bhola Singh, Son of late Ganauri Singh. All residents of village Manjaur, P.S. Warsaliganj, District Nawada. -- 1st party--- Petitioners--- Opp. Party 2nd Set 6. Arvind Singh, Son of late Mahadeo Singh. 7. Dinesh Singh, Son of Ram Ratan Singh. 8. Nunu Lal Singh, Son of late Parmeshwar Singh. 9. Suresh Singh, Son of late Parmeshwar Singh. 10. Naresh Singh, Son of late Parmeshwar Singh. All resident of village-Ramchandrapur, Manjuar, P.S. Warsaliganj, District Nawadah. --- 2nd party --- Opp. Party---- 3rd set ----------- 5 6.8.2009 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. By the impugned order the prayer made for attachment under Section 146 of the Cr.P.C. has been allowed. In the opinion of this Court, such order based on the subjective satisfaction drawn from the materials available on record by the court below would hardly require interference of this Court in exercise of its power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. If the petitioner is so sanguine about the pending civil proceedings, between the parties, he must await the result of the case but that cannot be a ground for quashing an order of attachment passed under Section 146 Cr.P.C.. With the aforementioned observations, this application is dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)