H1GH COURT OFCHHATnKSARHATBIUIiSPUR W.P.(SlNo.1410of2a)7 Pefitioner : Tirth Ram Sahu.S/o Shri JivanLalSahu, aged about 39 yeais, R/o Bhaisajhar, Koter, Bilaspur (C.G.) Vereus Respcmdents :1. StatBOfChhidtegarti, ThroughSecrete^, Sdue^anD^aitewrt, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Director of F'uMic InsteucBQn, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) Singte Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Safista K. Agnlhobl. Mr. Kumaresh Tiwari, Adwcate fw the PefiUoner. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Govt. Advocate for ttie r^xmdents/Ststo. ^- ORDER (Passed on this 12th day <rf fttoreh, 20W) The peUUoner is woridng as Asslstant Teadiw inttiegov»nment«*oot. In ttie course of his servtees as Assistant T^reher, the p^Borer ftas obtalned B.Ed. Examination Certificateon hisown eaqpenses in ttemonth <rfOct-Nov'96(P/3). Leamed counsel appearing for the prttioner ailMWts Uiat ttie tptwton invelved, herein asto whether ttie teaaher, wAo oMained B.Ed. ExaminaUon CerUficatB on hls own expenses, is entWed fc> two advance incremente. According to leamed counsel for the fwUttoror, the peiittoner is enWed to Iwo advance incremsnls in view of tha deciston oflhte Court in tfie case ofYashwant Kumar Bharatwaj \fe. MaiteiprfCorporatkm, Durgand another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 9Q. This Cw«tin th®case of Yashwamt Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Muntcipal CorpoFadtoR, Du^ suid a'lother (Supia), came to Uie conclusfon that <he tesffihas, who had dteined B.Ed. /B.T.I. Examin^ion Certlficate on their own aq»nses, are covered l^ ttie B/. (^) circutar dated 24.1Z96 (toin«u»ff^feaietf lytt»^ate ^nBmment ofMadhyaF^Ktesh. 4. Leamed coureel ftw the peUlfenw ftBttier sutante »K*ttr ftets and qu^ion <rf law Irwrolwd in the present case »» sqta»dyeovared by deciston of this Couit In tt»ase of Y^iNmnt Kumar ara(h»a^^fe. Municipal Corporafion, Durg and am>ther (St4»R^,te wUeh leamed counsel appeariTO tbr the respondents faiity coneedes and s^wes with the averment mad®by leamed counsela earing fortte peUSoiwr. 5. Accordir^ty, thewritpetition isalloiwed interrascrfttoonterpassedlnthe case ofYashwant KumarBharadwaj Vs. Muridpal Corporatten, Durg and another (Supfa), subject toverificatton ofthefert asta wh^ertha peUtioner has acquired B. Ed: ExamiradoB Gaffficirta on Ws wm fflcpens^as (»rttie cireuteis dated 24.12.1M8 &1.3.1999 and ftiittw nrfi^her he has b^ paid two advance niGremeidsor not No ordwas to costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge -^-