1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.6125 OF 2006 (ZANIRUNNISA ALI Vs STATE L.A.O. & OTH..) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri S.I. Ali, Advocate for petitioner. CORAM : K.J.ROHEE AND R.C.CHAVAN, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 30, 2008. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.. 2. It seems that the petitioner wants a share in the compensation amount. In fact, Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act requires that if any dispute arises as to the proportionment of the amount of compensation the party has to approach the Collector, who may refer such dispute to the Court for decision. Since the petitioner has failed to approach the Collector, he cannot invoke extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition is misconceived and the same is, 2 therefore, dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE RR.