RSA No.858 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.858 of 2009 Date of Decision: 11.11.2010. Purshinder Singh .....Appellant Versus M/s Ram Sarup Singh and sons and others ……Respondents Coram:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present: Mr.K. S. Sidhu, Sr. Advocate with Mr. G. S. Beniwal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Appellant and Mohan Singh, partner of respondent No.1-plaintiff in person. L. N. MITTAL, J (ORAL) With the efforts of the Court, appellant and respondent No.1-plaintiff have effected compromise in the instant RSA No.858 of 2009 as well as in connected RSA No.1227 of 2009 titled as M/s Ram Sarup Singh and sons versus M/s Shamsher Nagar Cold Storage and others, arising out of the same suit. Joint statement of appellant and Mohan Singh, partner of respondent No.1-plaintiff regarding compromise has been recorded separately and is reproduced hereunder:- “Stated that we have effected compromise in instant RSA No.858 of 2009 as well as in connected RSA No.1227 of 2009 arising out of the same suit. According to compromise, in addition to the amount of Rs.2,50,000/- already paid by the appellant, pursuant to interim order dated 16.11.2009 of this Court, the appellant-Purshinder Singh shall pay further amount RSA No.858 of 2009 -2- of Rs.3,00,000/- to plaintiff-respondent No.1 on or before 11.02.2011 and thereupon claim of plaintiff-respondent No.1 shall stand satisfied in toto. However, in the event of failure of the appellant to pay the aforesaid amount within the stipulated period, instant RSA No.858 of 2009 shall stand dismissed and connected RSA No.1227 of 2009 shall stand allowed and judgment and decree of the trial Court shall stand restored. In view of compromise, FIR lodged by respondent No.1 against appellant and others also stands compromised and complainant-respondent No.1 shall cooperate with the accused of the said FIR in getting the same quashed in view of compromise between the parties. Respondent No.1 shall furnish necessary affidavit and shall make necessary statement whatever required for quashing of the said FIR. Both the appeals be decided accordingly.” Thus both the appeals have been compromised lawfully. Accordingly both the appeals i.e RSA No.858 of 2009 and RSA No.1227 of 2009 are disposed of in terms of the above statement which shall form part of the decree-sheet. 11.11.2010. ( L. N. MITTAL ) A. Kaundal JUDGE