IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15229 of 2004 JANARDAN PRASAD, S/O LATE KAMESHWAR PRASAD, R/O MOHALLA-MADHUBANI-RAJENDRA NAGAR, P.S.- K.HAT, DISTRICT-PURNIA. ……………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY (LEGAL REMEMBERANCER) LAW DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PURNIA (BIHAR). 3. MD. BADDIUJANA, ADVOCATE, CIVIL COURT, PURNIA (BIHAR). 4. THE DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, PURNIA. ……………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 4 14.07.2010 In this writ application a notification dated 24.11.2004 appointing respondent no. 3 as Public Prosecutor for Civil Court, Purnia, is under challenge. It is admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that fresh panel has now been sent to the Government for appointment of a new Government Public Prosecutor. In view of this later development, this Court is not inclined to proceed in the matter further. However, it is made clear that any fresh consideration for appointment of Public Prosecutor of the Civil Court on the basis of a panel forwarded to the Government by the District authorities, the guidelines laid down by this Court in the case of Vindhyawasini Singh Vs. State of Bihar 2 (reported in 1996 (2) BLJ 583) should be kept in mind. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)