1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Criminal Application No.2209 of 2005 In Criminal Application No.2208 of 2005 TCI Finance Ltd. Petitioner Vs. M/s.Salstar Foods & Beverages Ltd. and ors. Respondents Mr.P.A.Pol, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. August 24, 2007. P.C. . This is an application for condonation of delay in seeking leave to appeal. As per the office note the delay caused is of three years, one month and three days. . Rule was granted on 21/11/2005 and as per the last report recorded in the Farad sheet the respondent no.2 has been served. The said respondent is the Director of the Respondent no.1 - Company. No steps have been taken to cause the appearance of respondent no.2. The report also indicates that the respondent no.1 - company has changed its address at Pune whereas the respondent no.2 resides at Mumbai and he has been served at his Mumbai address. 2 . I am satisfied that the delay caused in filing the application deserves to be condoned and hence the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (B.H.MARL