IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO.No. 335 of 2006. Date of Decision:8.12.2011. _______________________________________________ Executive Engineer, TLSC (BCB) Slapper, Mandi, H.P. ….Petitioner. Versus. 1.Nika son of Sh. Chichhu, residents of village Mangrot, Pargana and Tehsil Sadar, District Bilaspur, H.P. 2. Paras Ram son of Sh. Chichhu, residents of village Mangrot, Pargana and Tehsil Sadar, District Bilaspur, H.P. 3. Nandu son of Sh. Chichhu, residents of village Mangrot, Pargana and Tehsil Sadar, District Bilaspur, H.P. 4(a) Prakash Chand son of Sh. Dhanu Ram. 4(b) Smt.Putra Devi d/o Sh. Dhanu Ram 4(c) Smt.Nirmala Devi d/o Sh.Dhanu Ram 4(d) Smt.Kanta Devi d/o Sh.Dhanu Ram 4(e) Smt.Shakuntla Devi d/o Sh.Dhanu Ram. 4(f) Smt.Indira Devi wd/o Sh.Dhanu Ram, All resident of village Magrot, Tehsil and District Bilaspur, H.P. 5.Land Acquisition Collector (TLSC(BCB), Mandi, H.P. ….Respondents. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. Whether approved for reporting1? No. For the petitioner: :Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India with Ms.Anita Dogra, Central Govt. Counsel For Respondent-5: Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Dy. Advocate General. For Respondemt-2. Mr.Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate. Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?yes. 2 Dev Darshan Sud, J(Oral). The grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that in execution proceedings arising out of an award passed by the Land Acquisition Collector and subsequent reference proceedings in this Court, the interest on the awarded amount has been directed to be paid by the Executing Court from the date of taking possession and not from the date of notification as has been laid down by the Supreme Court and subsequently followed by this Court in L.A.C. Vs. Ratti Ram, Latest HLJ 2008 (HP) 104. The law is now well settled that interest will be payable only from the date of notification and not from the date of possession as held by this Court in Ratti Ram’s case (supra). However, it will be open to the claimants- respondents to establish their claim for use and occupation of the land before the learned Reference Court in case the possession of the land has been taken before the issuance of formal notification under Section 4 of the Act. For this purpose, the parties would be free to adduce evidence in accordance with law. It is clarified that no other evidence except that which is necessary for determination of compensation for use and occupation of the land and deprivation of its use by the claimants prior to the notification under Section 4 of the Act will be allowed. The petition is disposed of. All pending applicant(s) shall stand disposed of. (Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. December 8, 2011(R) 3