HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2331 of 2006 DATE: 01.04.2010 Between: Gaddam Pochaiah … Petitioner and The State of A.P. through S.I. of Police, I Town P.S., Jagitial, Karimnagar Dist. And others … Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2331 of 2006 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed by Gaddam Pochaiah with a prayer to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 and 3 as illegal and arbitrary. 2. This Court, by an order dated 28.02.2006, directed the Principal District Judge, Karimnagar District, to summon the petitioner as also his wife and cause an enquiry into the allegations in the writ petition and submit a report. The Principal District Judge, Karimnagar District, conducted enquiry and submitted a report dated 18.05.2006. As per the report, the petitioner did not choose to appear before the District Judge, despite a notice being served on him. The relevant portion of the report reads as hereunder: “Thus, the petitioner appears to have been not inclined to prove the allegations made by him in his affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. While the police officers who are appearing in person, filed their respective counter affidavits denying the several allegations made by the petitioner in his affidavit, the petitioner chose not to appear and prove the allegations made by him in his affidavit. The petitioner thus failed to stand himself, and to put his wife to the test of cross-examination and to cross examine the respondents 1 to 4. These circumstances make me to observe that if the several allegations made by the petitioner in his affidavit are true, in all probability, he would not have remained absent but would have come forward to prove the allegations made by him. The petitioner thus failed to prove the allegations made by him in his affidavit.” 3. When the writ petition came up for consideration, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing for respondents 5 and 6 submits that the 3rd respondent has been transferred from I Town P.S., Jagitial, and presently he is working at Pedapally. The 4th respondent also has been transferred from Rural P.S., Jagitial, and presently he is working at Karimnagar. 5. In view of the report submitted by the Principal District Judge, Karimnagar District, I do not see any substance in the allegations made by the petitioner against respondents 1 to 6. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________________ B. SESHASAYANA REDDY,J 1st April, 2010 CBS HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2331 of 2006 (Dismissed) 1st April, 2010 CBS