?N^5-.c y^«^' d l^ \^J^ 6 INTSS aowBLK me»COVRTOF CSSATTISGARa JOmCAtVStS AT BSLA8PUR W.J*. t8f Sto. ^ ^3 /200SI PKTrrSONKK. ..-•w .•<^' ..•' ^t^/ /\<-y^;W ^••^^^ ^^/^ <^'^" / •<:e' Gooal Poyam, S/o Oundru Ram Fouam., Agect 31 yecirs, Post-^s^istant Veterinary Field Officer, Veterinary Dispe,nsary Basaguda District Bijapur { C.G.) ^ VKR8V8 l.^': SSSPONSSlfTS:- x Z.Stote of Chhattisgarh Through, Secretaru , Department of Agriculturefvetemiarul Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, RaipurfC.G.) / 2. Deputy Director , Veterniary Sefvices Dantewada, Dist^ Dantewado. (C.G) fy^^^ :il:lii w;iaaiss-'^s^S^s^^^ws^K ^ WStfT PETfTfON VlfDSR AKT1CX.S 226/2270r TffJSCOWSTITirTJOyOJP JWDIA JS^ K << .HIGH COURT OF CHI&TTISGARH AT.BILASPUR WRTTPETmON(S) No. 6473 of2009 PETmONER RESPONTDENTS Gopal Poyam. VERSUS State ofGhhattisgarh & another. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTIGLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTmjTION_OF mpiA , .;.,-; SB: Hon'ble Shri SatishK. ASnlbotei.J, Present: Ms.Deepali Pandey, Advocate for thepetitioner. Sfari N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the Sfate/respondents. ORDERYORALy / "-^ - . (Passed Qn09ttdayof November, 2009) With fhe consent ofleamed couusel appearing for the parties, the matter is heardfinallv. 1. Leamedcounsel appearmgforthe petitioner submits that despite the order dated 29 June, 2009 (Annexure P/l), fhe petitioner, working as Assistant Veterinary Field OfScer.at Veterinary Dispensary, Basaguda, District Bijapurto Darbba, District Bastar. However, fhe petitioner has not yet been relievedtojoinfhenewplaceofpostmg. Ms^Pandeysubmitsthat oncethe order oftransfer has beenpassgp;,it is for Ifie govemment to ensure that it is complied with immediately. She relies on a decisien offhe Supreme Court mSreedam Chandra Ghoshv.State cifAssam & others , 'm support ofher contention that ifthe order is ribf compSied wi'th, a direction can be issued fbr enfbrcement thereo£ V • • 2. Shri N.N.Roy.leamed Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondents, as usual prays for time to seek mstructions. 3. I am unable to understand.asto what instrucfions he needs ifthere is an order on record. If the aforesaid 'trahsfer order is ,.still in existence, the govemment is under an obIigatiotfto-complY.with the same at once. R is accordingly directed that the transfer order shall be complied with forthwith within a period Qftwo weeks. . ; -. , .- 4. Accprdingly, this petition is disposed of | • sa/- SatishK-Agnihotri Judge •IT-T T-a%6)108CC567