IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17093 of 2008 SUNAYNA DEVI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 4 03.07.08. This is an application filed under Section 438 in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 25/2007 being G.R. No. 192/2007 for offence under Sections 304B and201/34 I.P.C. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners are sister-in-law and brother-in-law (Gotani and Dewar) of the deceased wife. There is no specific allegations against these petitioners. Father-in-law and mother-in-law and other relatives have already been allowed regular bail and the husband of the deceased is in custody. Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts that petitioner Sunayna Devi is female member of the family and is younger Gotani of the deceased. Her prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. She is directed to surrender before concerned Judicial Magistrate within four weeks from today. In that event she shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 25/2007, being G.R. No. 192/2007, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. So far petitioner No.2, Balram Mahto considering the seriousness of the offence I do not feel inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner No. 2 Balram Mahto. He may surrender in the court below and seek regular bail from the court of C.J.M., Darbhanga. In that event, C.J.M. shall dispose of his bail application on merit of the case without being prejudiced by this order. M. Pal. (Rekha Kumari, J.)