!v 43 & 44. *INTHEHIGHcoURToFDELHIATNEWDELHI +CRL.REV.P,L3o/2011andCr1.M.A.3541-3542/20IL VED PRAKASH ."" Petitioner Through: Mr. MalaYa Chand, Advocate VCTSUS . cBI rhroush: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, ,ttto'l3s33lffJ'' +cRL.REV.P.13t/20t1andCrl.M.A.3539-3540/20LL a.ln \F pRADEEp KUMAR SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. MalaYa Chand, Advocate VCTSUS CBI ""' ResPondent Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Standing Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI ORDER o/o 25.03.2011 The present revision petitions are preferred by the petitioners against the judgment of conviction dated 11.03.2011 passed by the Special Judge-CBI, Delhi, convicting the petitioners under Section 120-8 IPC read with Sections 7, L2 and 13(1)(d) and substantive offence under Section 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of CorruPtion Act. w CRL.REV.P. 73O/2077 and CRL.REV.P' 737/2077 Page 7 of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified : _-' Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent/CBl states that arguments on the order on sentence are yet to be addressed and the matter is listed on 26.03.2011, i.e., tomorrow for the said purpose. He further states that the present petitions are not maintainable on account of the fact that the judgment of conviction is an appealable order. At this stage, counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn alongwith the pending applications. MARCH rkb 25, 20lL HIMA KOHLI,J CRL.REV.P. 73O/2077 and CRL.REV.P. 737/2O77 Page 2 of 2