IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 261 of 2005 Dr. Sanjay Kumar Sachan …..…… Petitioner Versus State of Uttaranchal and others ....……… Respondents Coram:- Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, Chief Justice Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, Judge Present: Mr. I.P. Gairola, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Date of Decision: 20.05.2010 J.S. Khehar, C.J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that he has been instructed that the entire payment due to the petitioner has since been released to him, and as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 20.05.2010 P. Singh \