IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH APRIL 2009 / 25TH CHAITHRA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 1958 of 2009() ------------------------------------------ (CRIME NO.95 OF 2009 OF CHAVARA POLICE STATION) PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ----------------------------------- 1. NIZAR, S/O.KASIM PILLAI, AGED 30 YEARS, VALIYATH PADEETTATHIL, MENAMPALLY MURI, CHAVARA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK. 2. MUNEER, S/O.MUHAMMED KUNJU, AGED 26 YEARS, HOUSE NO.11, KUNNEL LEKSHAM VEEDU, PATTATHANAM MURI, CHAVARA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK. 3. SHAJI, S/O.RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI, AGED 27 YEARS, PARUTHIRAYYATTU, PATTATHANAM MURI, CHAVARA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK. 4. SHAFI, S/O.SHAMSUDHEEN, AGED 22 YEARS, CHAKKALA KIZHAKKATHIL HOUSE, MUKYNDAPURAM MURI, CHAVARA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY. 5. RIYAS, S/O.MUHAMMED KUNJU, 24 YEARS, KIZHAKKADATHU VADAKKATHIL, PATTATHANAM MURI, CHAVARA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK. 6. NIHAS, S/O.SHAMSUDHEEN KUNJU, 29 YEARS, THEYYILPUTHEN VEEDU, PATTATHANAM MURI, CHAVARA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK. BY ADVS. MR.C.S.MANU, MR.S.K.PREMRAJ. RESPONDENT(S): STATE & COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, (NOTICE TO WHOM MAY BE SERVED ON PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.) BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. K.MEERA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss P. BHAVADASAN, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= B.A. No. 1958 of 2009 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this the 15th day of April, 2009 O R D E R This is a petition filed under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail. 2. Petitioners are accused 1 to 6 in Crime No.95/2009 of the Chavara Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 323, 324 and 302 read with section 149 IPC. 3. learned Public Prosecutor pointed out that the investigation is almost over, but the petitioners are involved in other crimes also. However, in the light of the fact that the investigation is over and also the fact the learned Public Prosecutor was unable to show as to why the custody of the petitioners should continue, I am inclined to grant bail to petitioners. 4. The application is allowed as follows: 1) Petitioners shall be released on bail on each of them executing a bond for Rs.20,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like BA 1958/09 -2- sum each to the satisfaction of the Magistrate Court concerned. 2) Petitioners shall report before the investigating officer on every Wednesday between 10 a.m. and 11 a.m. till final report is laid. 3) Petitioners shall not tamper or attempt to tamper with the evidence or influence or try to influence the witnesses. P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE. mn.