Mgn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.25 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITON NO.7956 OF 2009 Shri Namdeo Laxman Navale ...Petitioner Vs. The Collector, Pune & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Gajanan M. Savagave, for the petitioner. Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED : 18TH FEBRUARY, 2010 P.C. It is the case of the petitioner that the land he applied for was agricultural land and not industrial, or for residence. We have disposed off the petition by directing the petitioner to make fresh proposal for agricultural land. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner now points out that his application dated 6th July, 2009 was for agricultural land and not for industrial land. The respondents to consider the said application and if it is for agricultural land to consider the same and if there is no agricultural land available in terms of the letter to allot some other agricultural land after giving the proposal to the petitioner. The entire exercise to be completed within a period of sixteen weeks from today. With the above observation Review Petition disposed off. (K.K. TATED, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)