IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11300 of 2011 Prushottam Singh Versus Krishna Singh & Ors ----------- 04. 25.07.2011 This writ application was already passed over as nobody appeared. Subsequently, the learned counsel appeared and mentioned that he is ready to argue the case and, therefore, it is taken up and heard. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 12.05.2011 passed by Additional District Judge, F.T.C. I, Jamui in Claim Case No.20 of 2008 whereby the learned Court below observed that after disposal of application under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicle Act filed by the respondent, the other applications shall be disposed of. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in fact, he has filed two applications and it was necessary that the learned Court below should have decided the said applications prior to passing order under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicle Act. From perusal of the impugned order, the learned Court below only observed as stated above. In view of the above facts by the impugned order, no rights of any of the parties have been decided. I, therefore, find that in exercise of 2 supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the impugned order cannot be interfered with. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)