IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION BA1 Bail Application No.918 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Ishaq ..….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite party Dated: October 20, 2010 __________________________________________________________________ Arising out of FIR No.26 of 2010 Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC P.S. Purola, District Uttarkashi ______________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the victim Km. Vrinda was major on the date of incident and she was the consenting party in the whole incident. It is pleaded that the applicant is in jail since 28.8.2010 and the trial of the case has yet not started. After considering all the facts and circumstances; on hearing learned counsel for the parties; on perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Ishaq be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Uttarkashi. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 20.10.2010 RG