IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.371 of 2008 MD. MAQSOOD Versus MD. ABID @ ABID HUSSAIN 4 18.8.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Defendant-tenant-petitioner has tried his best to linger suit on one pretext or other and that is how Eviction suit of the year 2001 has not yet been disposed of. The impugned order also takes care of earlier such efforts of the petitioner-defendant-tenant and therefore, when this court finds that the proposed examination of one Jagdish Sharma was bereft of the pleading as has been noted by the court below, this Court would not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order. Accordingly, this civil revision application being devoid of any merit is hereby dismissed with a cost of Rs 2,500/- to be realized from the petitioner and to be paid to opposite party, the plaintiff landlord within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. shahid (Mihir Kumar Jha, J)