IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY THURSDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2011 / 10TH BHADRA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 2803 of 2011() ------------------------- SC.982/2010 of ADDL. SESSIONS COURT (FAST TRACK -II ADHOC), THRISSUR CRIME NO. 45/2008 of PAVARATTY POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED:- -------------------------- JINESH,S/O.MOHANAN,KUNNATHULLY VEEDU, PARAMBANTHALLY DESOM,MULLASSERY VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS/ COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM - 682 031. (CRIME NO.45/2008 OF PAVARATTY POLICE STATION,THRISSUR) 2. MANEESH,AGED 22 YEARS,S/O.MANI, EDAMANI VEEDU,VENGIDANGU VILLAGE, KURUVANTHALA DESOM-680 510. 3. SUBHA,AGED 20 YEARS,D/O.BHASKARAN, PANTHAL PADOM HOUSE,KURUVANTHALA LAKSHAM VEEDU COLONY,VENGIDANGU VILLAGE-680510. ADV. SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED FOR R2 & R3 SRI. B. VINOD, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.M.C.NO.2803/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE I : A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 45 OF 2008. ANNEXURE II : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN S.C. NO.1286/2008 DATED 01.02.2010 PASSED BY THE ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, THRISSUR. ANNEXURE III : AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY RESPONDENT NO.2. ANNEXURE IV : AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY RESPONDENT NO.3. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rv B.P. RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No.2803 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of September, 2011. O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the de facto complainant and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The petitioner is the 3rd accused in Crime No. 45 of 2008 of Pavaraty Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 395 IPC and now pending as S.C. No. 982 of 2010 before the Additional Sessions Court (Fast Track-II Adhoc), Thrissur. The co-accused persons have been acquitted after trial as per judgment dated 01.02.2010 in S.C. No. 1286 of 2008. It is stated that the matter has been settled between the parties. If that be so, the petitioner as well as the de facto complainant shall make a statement before the trial court to that effect. In that event if the learned trial court is satisfied that the matter has been settled out of court, then it shall close the case by discharging the accused. This Crl.M.C is disposed of as above. sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE. rv