IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1133 of 2009 Mostt.Suraj Mal Kuer, Wife of Late Naga Singh, Resident of village- Neknampur, P.S.- Deoria, District-Muzaffarpur. …..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar …Opp. Party. ----------- 02. 03.03.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph 8 of the bail application. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code The petitioner is the mother-in-law (step). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is completely blind and therefore she could not have participated in the alleged occurrence. The Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur should take appropriate steps to ascertain whether the petitioner is blind or not before granting bail. If the Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur is satisfied either on the personal appearance of the petitioner or after getting her examined by the Medical Board that she is blind, the petitioner namely Mostt. Suraj - 2 - Mal Kuer should be enlarged on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest or surrender in connection with Deoria P.S. Case No. 11 of 2006 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. I may clarify that during the pendency of the examination of the petitioner with respect to her blindness no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner until final decision is released by the Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur. Vikash/- (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)