1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.2254 OF 2006 Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Union Petitioners vs. The Security Guards Board for Gr. Respondents Mumbai & Thane & ors. Ms.Vaishali Bhilare for the petitioners. Ms.Lata Desai with Ms.Pallavi Divekar for respondent no.1. Mr.Suresh S. Pakale for respondent no.2. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED : 14th November, 2006 P.C. Heard parties. 2. On behalf of respondent no.2, on instructions, the learned counsel makes a statement that respondent no.2 has taken a decision to appoint security guards as direct employees. The statement made on behalf of respondent no.2 is accepted. 3. On behalf of the petitioner, the learned counsel makes a statement that the guards whose names are listed at Exh.A have not been paid their salaries for the last month. If that be so, respondent no.2 is directed to 2 pay the unpaid salaries at any rate not later than two weeks from today. If the guards whose names are listed in Exh.A, applied for registration with respondent no.1, respondent no.1 to consider their application and pass appropriate orders not later than eight weeks from today. 4. With the above observation, petition is disposed of. ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) F.I. REBELLO, J.) ( ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. ) ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. ) ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. )