:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.181 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.2849 OF 2006 Ankur Sambhare. ..Plaintiff. Vs. Mrs. Ranjana R. Soparkar and ors. ..Defendants. Mr.N.K. Mody i/by M/s. Rustamji & Ginwala for the plaintiff. Mr.N.N. Mayekar i/by Little & Co. for the Resp.No.2. CORAM : R.S.MOHITE, J. DATE : 8th May, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is a chamber summons taken out by the original plaintiff for amendment of the plaint. On perusing the schedule which is enclosed along with the affidavit, it is seen that the main prayer is for adding Defendant No.2A who is son of the defendant No.2 and who according to the defendants is a joint owner of the suit premises. The affidavit in reply narrates this fact and this fact came to the notice of the plaintiff on receipt of the affidavit in reply. The other amendment pertains to prayer in respect of declaration of statutory charge. In my view, the amendment is formal and not seriously objected. Hence, chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and stands disposed off. Costs will be costs in the suit. Amendment to be carried out on or before 15.6.2009. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)