IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 15TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 24TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30261 of 2011(G) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- TKM COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE GOVERNING BODY, SHAHAL.H. MUSALIAR. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM SMT.NISHA GEORGE RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SHAH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.30261/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 2/4/2010 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER. P2 COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER NO.21199/J3/07/H.EDN DATED 14/12/2007. P3 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 6/6/2006 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER. P4 COPY OF THE CHART OF WORK LOAD AND STAFF PATTERN AS PER AICTE NORMS. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 30261 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is an aided Engineering College. 2. According to the petitioner, they have submitted Exts.P1 and P3 to the first respondent for approval of the staff pattern in terms of the norms prescribed by All India Council for Technical Education. However the same has not been considered by the first respondent so far. It is mainly complaining of the delay in the matter this writ petition is filed. 3. Taking note of the said grievance of the petitioner and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, I dispose of the writ petition directing the first respondent to pass orders on Exts.P1 and P3 in consultation with the 2nd respondent. This shall be done by the first respondent as expeditiously as possible at any rate W.P.(C) No. 30261 OF 2011 :2 : within 8 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge