IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37935 of 2009 ANZAR ALAM,son of Md.Chamaru,resident of village-Burhimari,P.S.-Kochadhaman, District-Kishanganj. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04/ 30-03-2010 Heard Mr. Firoz Ahmad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Dashrath Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kochadhaman P.S.Case No.119 of 2003 dated 23-09-2003, registered under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present case has been lodged by the Dafadar on 23-09-2003, but prior to that mother of the deceased Most. Sahar Bano had registered a U.D.Case vide Annexure-2, where she had stated that her daughter was married with the petitioner, but due to unbearable pain in her stomach she committed suicide. Learned counsel for the State points out that though the present case was filed in the year 2003 but the petitioner has been absconding for a quite long time and, therefore, if the Court is inclined to consider the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail, then strict conditions may be imposed. In the aforesaid background, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today in Kochadhaman P.S.Case No.119 of 2003, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees 2 ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and subject to the further conditions (a) that one of the bailors must be a Government servant or close family member of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner and (b) that the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. The trial court is also directed to make all endeavours to conclude the trial of the petitioner within a period of six months from the date of release of the petitioner on bail. If the petitioner does not co-operate in early conclusion of the trial, then that may be treated as misuse of privilege of anticipatory bail extended to the petitioner and that may entail cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner by the order passed by the trial court itself. AH/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)