IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37212 of 2010 1. JANARDAN MISHRA,son of late Achambhi Mishra 2. Kari Mishra, son of Sri Janardan Mishra. Both are resident of village Dafarpur Purwari Tola, P.S.-Naokothi, . District-Begusarai Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 08-10-2010 Heard the parties. In a criminal prosecution registered under Sections 304B/498A of the Indian Penal Code, as also under Sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the petitioners besides co-accused Vikash Kumar Mishra, husband of the deceased, have been arrayed as accused. It is submitted that petitioner no.1 Janardan Mishra is the grand father-in-law of the deceased, whereas petitioner no.2 is the uncle-in-law of the deceased. In the F.I.R. vide Annexure-1 allegation of demand of dowry of a Motor cycle and torture are general and omnibus in nature, though primal role for committing the crime in question has been attributed to co-accused Vikash Kumar Mishra, the husband of the deceased. It is further submitted that petitioner no.1 being grand father-in-law is an old man, aged about 70 years and petitioner no.2 being uncle-in-law of the deceased is separate in mess and business with co-accused Vikash Kumar Mishra, the husband of the deceased. It is stated by Mr. Vikramdeo Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner that the husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the above named petitioners are directed to be 2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrare, Begusarai, in connection with Naokothi P.S.Case No.59 of 2010, subject to the conditions that : (A) one of the bailors must be a Government servant or close family members of the petitioners, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing their relationship with the petitioners and (B) the petitioners shall make regular Pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing themselves in person or through representation their lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioners fail to make Pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners. A.H./ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)