IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 27th day of March, 2010 Ist Bail Application No. 373 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Sanjay Taigore .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 58/2010, U/s 2(b)(1)(2)(11)/3 of UP Gangster and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, PS Rishikesh, District Dehradun. _______________________________________________________________ March 27, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Mr. DS Patni, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Heard. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant submitted that there are two cases as shown in the gang-chart against the applicant registered with PS Kotwali Rishikesh, Dehradun i.e. Case Crime No. 43/2010 u/s 60/72(2) of Excise Act and Case Crime No. 44/2010 u/s 420, 471 IPC. He further submitted that in both the aforesaid cases, the applicant has been granted bail. In Case Crime No. 43/2010, the applicant has been granted bail vide order dated 6.2.2010 passed by the Additional Judicial Magistrate, Rishikesh and in Case Crime No. 44/2010, he has been granted bail vide order dated 17.2.2010 passed by the Sessions Judge, Dehradun, copies of both the orders have been annexed as Annexure No. 3 & 4 to the bail application. He further submitted that only on the basis of the aforesaid two cases, a new case under Section 2(b) (1)(2)(11)/3 of UP Gangster and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 has been made against the applicant. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Sanjay Taigore be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Special Judge, UP Gangster and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Dehradun. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 27.3.2010 PRABODH 2