CWP(T) No. 2519 of 2008. 30.03.2009 Present: Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General for respondents N o.1 to 3. The petitioner is seeking re-fixation of his pay/salary at Rs.740/- instead of Rs.680/- in the pay-scale of Rs.570-1080 after giving him the benefit of three advance increments and six increments for approved military service. The case of the State is that entire benefits have been given to the petitioner towards his past military service by granting him six increments and his pay has been fixed at Rs.680/- on 15.9.1978. The petitioner has since been granted six increments by taking into consideration his approved military service; he cannot be termed as fresh appointee for the purpose of release of three increments. Three advance increments were to be released to him if he was a fresh appointee and had not received the benefits of approved military service. Accordingly, he has failed to make out any case for release of three advance increments. Consequently, there is no merit in this petition and same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), J. March 30, 2009. (sck)