ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2864 OF OF MOTION NO. 2864 OF OF MOTION NO. 2864 OF 2007 2007 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO. 436 OF 2007 (L) NO. 436 OF 2007 (L) NO. 436 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 2449 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 2449 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 2449 OF 2004 Kush Sitaram Chavan & Ors. ...Appellant. Vs. M/s. WMI Cranes Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. N.M.Ganguli for the appellants. Mr. Piyush Shah for the respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 30TH NOVEMBER, 2007 : 30TH NOVEMBER, 2007 : 30TH NOVEMBER, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel for the respondents. By this Notice of Motion, the appellants are seeking condonation of 14 days delay in filing the above appeal. Perused the Notice of Motion and affidavit in support thereof. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay in filing the above appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). ( 2 ) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)