IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 217 of 2008 (S/S) Ved Prakash & another. .……… Petitioners Versus Union of India & others. .………. Respondents. Smt. Pushpa Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent Nos. 2 & 4. Ms. Beena Pandey, Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. / respondent No. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. BARIN GHOSH, C. J. (Oral) The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievances of the petitioners have been met during the pendency of the writ petition, inasmuch as, they have been relieved by the State of Uttarakhand. 2. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C. J.) 03.01.2011 03.01.2011 G