IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2603 of 2010. Decided on: 26th May, 2010. Unnas Mohammed. ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and anr. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(A) That this writ petition may kindly be allowed and writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued and the respondent department be directed to regularize the service of the petitioner on completion of 8 years of service as it has been done in the case of other teachers, with all consequential benefits.” Since the petitioner has submitted all his grievances in Annexure P-4, representation, we do not propose to deal with the same on merits. It is for the first respondent to consider the same. There will be a direction to 2 the first respondent to consider Annexure P-4, representation on merits, adverting to the contentions taken by the petitioner in the representation and pass a speaking order in accordance with law and justice within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 26th May, 2010 ( Justice Surinder Singh), (tr) Judge.