IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7426 of 2009 1. LALOO RAM, son of late Petu Ram. 2. Gayatri Devi @ Lakhiya,w/o Laloo Ram. Both resident of village-Mathiya, P.S.-Chhatauni(Motihari),Dist.-East Champaran. 3.Sunil Ram, son of Raman Ram, resident of village-Bheriyahi,P.S.-Chiraiya,District- East Champaran. 4.Chhote Ram, son of Jumuna Ram,resident of village-Rupdih,P.S.-Muffasil(Motihari), District-East Champaran. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 06-04-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that a case of love affair has been made a case of 366A, that also in between Rinki Kumari and Raju Kumar. Victim’s family members alleged regarding petitioners having hand in disappearance of the victim, while the victim herself in her examination under Section 164 Cr.P.C. exonerated the petitioners asserting her love affair with Raju Kumar and marrying him, that was later accepted by her parental family also and a compromise petition has been filed, but in any case basing the same petitioners’ arrest cannot be justified. I agree with the same. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Chhatauni P.S.Case No.138/2008, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Rakesh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, 2 Motihari, East Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )