IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2594 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:21.04.2011. Narinder Kumar Goyal ...Petitioner Versus Navneet Kaur Gill and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 28.02.2011 by which the learned Rent Controller has assessed the provisional rent to be paid by the tenant to the landlords on 02.05.2011. Insofar as the rate of rent is concerned, that being `24,610/- per month is not in dispute. The only dispute is with regard to the period of rent to be tendered as the landlords are claiming it from June, 2009, whereas the petitioner/tenant is alleging that he has already paid the rent up to December 2009. While appreciating the controversy, the learned Rent Controller observed that there is no prima facie evidence led in the shape of receipt or otherwise from which it could be found out that the rent has been paid by the tenant up to December, 2009. Even no prima facie evidence has been produced before this Court to prove that the rent has been paid up to December, 2009. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the present revision petition and as such, the same is hereby dismissed in limine, however, without any order as to costs. April 21, 2011. (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge