1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.544 OF 2009 Sarita Pratap Shirke and Ors. .... Petitioners V/s. Gopal Purushottam Shirole and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.Vineet B. Naik with Mr.Sukand R. Kulkarni i/by Manoj Wadekar & Associates, for the petitioners. CORAM :P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 27, 2009 P.C. 1. No ground is made out for interference in a revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as the learned Trial Judge by giving cogent reasons rightly held that this being a suit for possession, the plaint is not required to be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, as the suit is filed by the plaintiff on the ground of arrears of rent and it is not the only ground taken in the suit and the order of the learned trial Judge is a well reasoned order. Hence, the civil revision application is dismissed. ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J.)