IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39012 of 2008 1. UMESH KUMAR YADAV 2. CHANDAN YADAV @ CHANDAN KR. YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 24/10/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a police case under Sections- 376 and 323/34 of I.P.C. The prosecutrix is the informant herself. The allegation is direct against petitioner no.1. The application is rejected insofar he is concerned. In view of the fact that there is no allegation under Section-376 of I.P.C. against petitioner No.2, let petitioner No.2 above named surrender before the court below within six weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Manihari P.S. Case No.17/2008, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. It goes without saying that the considerations for anticipatory bail and regular bail are entirely different. The rejection of the former cannot prejudice the latter. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )