fiirti, m B*> ssu 5 sr ,y& £. tatMU C^IQD IN THE HIGH COURT OP CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S)ffoA^ QF 2006-&7 PBTITIONER ^ /\" -.*' ^ .•* ^%^:--""" .••" L^i'J\X-' ^\y- \.Y- Kamlesh Kumar Mishra S/o. Shri Krishna Kant Mishra aged about 44 years, Occupation - Service, Posted as Assistent teacher R/o. Govt. H.S.School ,Pataud ,Trible Deptt. Distt.- North Bastar Kanker Chhattishgarh. VERSUS \:? <^- ^ K,,3^ r ? RESPONDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, ' Through fhe Secretary Department of School Education, D.K.S. BuUding, Raipzir (C.G.) 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Kanker Distt.- Kanker (C.G.) ^3. District Education officer, Kanker Distt.- Kanker (C.G.) 4, The Director of pubUc Instruction pension Bada Raipur, Distt.- Raipur WRTT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OF COISSTITUTION OF INDIA HI6H COURT OF WHATTtSeAKH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. WMT PETTTION (S.) N0. 48S OF 2007 Petitioner versus Resoondents Kamlesh Kumar Mishra The State of Chhaff'isgarh and o'thers Present : Mr. Anand 5hukh, Advocate for thepetitioner. Mrs. Anju Ahu^i, Deputy fiovernment Advocate for the State/respondents. OR&ER O'assed on 29th bay of Jcmuary, 2007) 1. Leamed counset appearing for the petitioner as well as for •the State/respondents jointly submit that the fact-s ond question of lenv invoh/ed in the present writ petition are squarely covered by the decision of this Court- in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharaehvaj vs. Mwric^al Corporatlon. Dwy and cHwthw)'. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of •the decision of this Court in the matter of Ya^iwcvit Kumar SwrodvMJ (Siyra), subject to verification of -the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed. cerf'ificate at his own expenses as per the circutars dnted 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and fur-ther whether he has been paid two odvance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 20060DMPJR-C696 Bablu