:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 702 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 702 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 702 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 8020 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 8020 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 8020 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1034 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1034 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1034 OF 2005 Faryad Ahmed Gafar Ahmed Khan ..Applicant (Ori.Accused No.3) versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondents Mr. M. S. Mohite for the Applicant - Original Accused No. 3. Mrs. V. R. Bhosale, APP for the Respondents - State. CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & CORAM : D. G. DESHPANDE, & S. A. BOBDE, JJ. S. A. BOBDE, JJ. S. A. BOBDE, JJ. DATE : 27TH JULY, 2006 DATE : 27TH JULY, 2006 DATE : 27TH JULY, 2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Counsel for the Applicant - Original Accused No.3 and learned APP for the State. 2. This is an application for modification of the Order passed by this Court ( B. H. Marlapalle & Smt. Roshan Dalvi, JJ.) on 23.1.2006 in Criminal Application No. 8020 of 2005. Paragraph 10 is :2: relevant, it is reproduced as under: "The application for bail of accused no.1 is rejected. Accused nos. 2 and 3 are granted bail on the same terms but upon a fresh bail bonds." 3. Counsel for the applicant states that accused No. 2 was already on bail during trial but the applicant - accused No.3 was not on bail. 4. Therefore, Applicant - accused No. 3 be released on P. R. Bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount. This is by way of clarification of the Order dated 23.1.2006. Order stands corrected accordingly. Application disposed of. (D.G. DESHPANDE, J. ) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J. ) (D.G. DESHPANDE, J. ) ( S.A. BOBDE, J.) ( S.A. BOBDE, J.) ( S.A. BOBDE, J.)