RES?QNBENT$ HEG’EE C®UR§ Q}? CEKATH§GARH AT BELAS?UR WRET EBE’EHEQN ($3 Na. 14314 ofZéES FETEEGNER : Jagnu Ram Sahu S/o Shri Kheou Ram Sahu Age about 58 vears‘ Asstt Teacher, R/o Maratkethra, Post Gamiai (Pandariya) Chhuikhadan: Dim. ~ Rajmmdgacn (CG) VERSES Siats GOW. 0f Chha‘giisgarh Thmagh : Suscre‘tary, Eciumtion & Tribai Deaamnmt D.K.S, Bhavml, Rainur (C G) 2. Dis‘i-rici Education Officey. Dim. “Raiaandgaon (CG) WRIT PETETEGN UNDER 1’ “TR? E 226 GF THE CONSTETUHON GF INDEA SE: Eaga’EaEe Shri Satish K. Agiai‘hmri. J. i‘egem: v 1 Somiam Vmma, Acivocate far the peiitioney. m ‘hri AME: Bak$hi, Gmeiimieiit Aévaca‘ie fer ihe mte/respanéleniS. {DEAL Dr “‘EL (13assad @11'18m éay 6f Februaxy, 2098) The pa‘itionsr was iniiiaih! appsimed or: 26.03.19’M- as Assisian‘t Teacher on a iExed my of Rs‘ 100A on pmlm‘iion for a period 0f W10 years. Aiie: conwieiion of pre’aaiiw, the pétiiioaer was grantsd regular Qay scale of Rs. 54$-)‘25/— 0:1 11.09.1984. The questioa of iaw invehred harem is asto wheth‘sr the peti’ibner is emitxad 1, § :0 regular pay gcaie Wi‘ih eilt‘ec‘i fmm ihe dam of initial appsixztment 01“ fmm ‘ihe dais of comgeiior; ofpmbatian periaé. Learned counsel aypaaring fey the petitioner as weii as éJag“ me 1 State/raspondems join‘dy suhmi‘t ihai tiw facts. and question 0f law imiohied in the petition are the same to ihai 0f W.F.(S) N0. 813 of 2&07 (Ram Kumar Sahu Vs. State Govt. of CEmaitisgam & another). which waS allowad Vida order dated 12.02.2907. Learned counsoi fart’hw submits ihat ihis oetition may ’06 dispowd of in ihe same terms. 151 View of the goove stated submission mwe by ieamed coainSoi f0? ihe paz’iiss, the writ petition is aEIoweo i’a ih-e same éemxs é.e. the petitioner S emit'ieé to regiilar pay some with effecé from ihe iniiia} ésge of apiwiiltmem, subjeet to verifica‘iiox} ofthe facis. Judge Sd/— l 11 ‘ _ w Satish K. Agnihoiri ‘ Am L ? 1 d