1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.136 OF 2003 Mr.Jaisingh Nath Singh Jat Petitioner vs. 1. The State of Maharashtra & ors. Respondents None for the petitioner. CORAM : R. M. LODHA, J. DATED : 20th January 2005 P.C. None appears for the petitioner. 2. The proceedings reflect that earlier on 28.2.2003, 13.3.2003, 26.3.2003 and 22.4.2003 none appeared for the petitioner and as a result thereof on 22.4.2003 the criminal writ petition came to be dismissed in default. Then by order dated 13.8.2003 the criminal writ petition was restored. Thereafter on 6.11.2003 and 3.12.2003 when the matter was posted before the Court none appeared for the petitioner. There is also office note that office objections have not been removed. The proceedings reflect total lack of diligence on the part of the petitioner and his advocate. 3. In the circumstances, criminal writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution as well as in default. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.)