IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER THURSDAY, THE 26TH JUNE 2008 / 5TH ASHADHA 1930 Cont.Case(C).No.1794 of 2007(S) --------------------------------------------- ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 03/03/2006 IN O.P.NO.13445/2001. .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER:- --------------------------------------- K.P.VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O C.R.RAVEENDRAN, AGED 45 YEARS, WORKING AS GUEST LECTURER IN SANSKRIT(IN VEDANTA), REGIONAL CENTRE OF SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, RESIDING AT 'INDEEVARAM', EVOOR SOUTH, KEERAKKAD P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT:- --------------------------------------------- DR. K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY, VICE CHANCELLOR OF SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, KALADY. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.P.K.VIJAYAMOHANAN. BY ADV. SRI.B.S.KRISHNAN(SR.),SC,SANSKRIT UTY. FOR R1 SRI.K.ANAND, SC, SANSKRIT UTY. FOR R1 SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN,SC,SANSKRIT UTY. FOR R1 SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN,SC,SREE SANK.UNIV FOR R1 SRI.GILBERT GEORGE CORREYA,SC,SANKAR.UT FOR R1 SRI.P.S.NISHIL,SC,SREE SANKARACHARYA UT FOR R1 THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- H.L.Dattu,C.J. & A.K.Basheer,J. --------------------------------------------------- Cont.Case (C).No.1794 of 2007-S ---------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 26th day of June, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu,C.J. The one and only direction that was issued by this Court while disposing of O.P.No.13445 of 2001 dated 3rd March, 2006 was to consider Exhibits P2 and P3 representations filed by the petitioner in accordance with law and in the light of the action taken in the case of one Smt.Sheeja. 2. After the disposal of the Original Petition, the respondents have passed an order dated 6.8.2007. In that, they have rejected the request made by the petitioner in Exhibits P2 and P3 representations. 3. The petitioner in the Original Petition is the complainant in this contempt petition. She alleges that the respondent has wilfully and deliberately disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court in O.P.No.13445 of 2001 dated 3rd March, 2006. 4. We fail to understand how the respondent has disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court while disposing of O.P.No.13445 of 2001. As we have already noticed, the one and only direction that was issued was to consider the representations - Exhibits P2 and P3 - and, in fact, the respondents have considered the representation and have passed an order. If, for any reason, the petitioner is aggrieved by the orders so passed by the respondents, necessarily she has to question the same before the appropriate authority. Therefore, we do not intend to take cognizance of this contempt petition. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of. Cont.Case (C).No.1794 of 2007-S - 2 - 5. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner/complainant to question the correctness or otherwise of the orders passed by the University dated 6th August, 2007 before the appropriate forum. Ordered accordingly. H.L.Dattu Chief Justice A.K.Basheer Judge vku/-