1 hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 114 OF 2008 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 114 OF 2008 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 114 OF 2008 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1091 OF 1990 WRIT PETITION NO. 1091 OF 1990 WRIT PETITION NO. 1091 OF 1990 Srikantia Somashekhar & Ors. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr.. Respondents And Nirav D. Somaiya ...Applicant None for Petitioner. Ms. Shaila Shikha i/by L.C. Tolat & Co. for Applicant. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: DECEMBER 18, 2008 DATED: DECEMBER 18, 2008 DATED: DECEMBER 18, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . The writ petition was disposed of on 21.4.1992 by a speaking order by this court in view of the order of the Supreme Court in Civil Writ Petition No. 404 of 1986 dated 21.7.1986 and 23.9.1986. Further direction was that the Respondent No. 2 therein was given time till 17.9.1992 to vacate the premises in terms of the order of the Supreme Court with specific directions that no further extension will be granted. Second respondent was to file undertaking in this court to vacate the said 2 premises on or before 17.9.1992.This was subject to the undertaking been filed. The record does not show any undertaking has been filed. . Chamber summons No. 114 of 2007 was taken on 21.4.2008 by one Mr. Nirav Somaiya who was not party to the said application. . In our opinion, this chamber summons is a total misuse of the process of the court. In the light of that, Chamber summons dismissed by imposing exemplary cost quantified at Rs.20,000/- to be deposited in the Account of the Legal Services Authority of the Court. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)