HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 21966 OF 1999 ORDER: This writ petition is filed challenging the award dated 25.10.1994 in I.D.No.53 of 1992 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Warangal. The respondents in the said I.D. are the petitioners herein while the second respondent workman was the petitioner in the I.D. The record reveals that the writ petition was dismissed for default as against the second respondent vide Court order dated 21.03.2003. The writ petition cannot be adjudicated on merits in the absence of the second respondent, who is the contesting respondent being the petitioner in the I.D. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. ___________________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR 3rd July, 2009 MD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 21966 of 1999 BETWEEN: 1 Arrack Bottling Unit, Vaira Khamma, rep. by A.P. BAVERAGES CORPORATION, rep. by it's General Manager, Hyderabad. 2 The Manager A.P.B.C. Ltd., Arrack Bottling Unit, Vaira, Khammam District. not necessary ... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Hon'ble Industrical Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, rep.by it's Presiding Officer, Warangal. 2 Mori Rajyalaxmi. Disd for default as per Court Order dt.21.3.03 as against R2 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue notice, call for records and quash and set aside the impugned award made in I.D.No.53/92 dt.25.10.1994 in so far as it is against the petitioner herein on the file of the Hon'ble Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad by issuance of a Writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order or orders or direction or directions as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case and to grant such other relief to which the petitioner is found entitled to and to allow the Writ Petition with costs other wise the petitioner will be put to great loss and hardship; and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioners : MR.G.RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following :