K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.564 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.142 OF 2005 The CIT Central-III ..Appellant Versus M/s.Excel Industries Ltd., ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Vasanti B.Patel for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 12.03.2008. PC 1. There is a delay of 628 days in preferring the appeal. 2. Question-(b) in paragraph-4 is answered in favour of the assessee by the judgment of the Supreme Court in 290 ITR 667 (SC). 3. Question-(a) whether tax effect is only Rs.2,38,596/-, in our opinion considering the tax effect and as cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause, Motion alongwith Appeal dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)