^.^SSSS^^fS^SSSSSSSS'i'fS 3°g; RR-IVo.....,,^°2/X S^S^SS^ g^_ RESPONDENTS INJTHE HIGHCOUJKLQFLJUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0. Y3 / 1 2006 Deep Shri Sahu D/o Late Shri Khelan Ram Sahu, aged about 27 years, R/o- Village, Ganiyari, Distt- Bilaspur (C.G). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary General Administrative Department D.K-S.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Distric Eklucation Officer Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur 3. Princ^pal Govt. Kanya Higher Secondaiy School Kota ,Dist.- Bilaspur. 4. State of Madhya Pradesh, Through: Secretary, General Adininistrative Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) 5. Union of India Through: Secretary Department of personal Public grievance and personnel thu-d Floor loknayak bhawan, khan market, NewDelhi. WRIT PETITION U/A 226/ 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT DIRECTION ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MArTER •V •^- XI-HC-22 ^=f ^flilid^, eiTlly'id, fefR?y Sn^F^T K-ij.+.an^r arqN"gf?a d(TPP y '/ '^ .\A^io-^~-£? )6^209 F'etitioner by Shri Sanjay ^grawal, Advocate. SliriS.P. Kale, Govt. Adv..for the State. . Shri S.K. Beriwal. Staildini Learaed counsel for the p of the eniplQyee has occurred i "bllirt-sil-l tITERii ^ feczt ^7 SlfiflTT 3?I^?r k Couasel for Union oflridia. With consent, heard finaUif. This case relates to coiup^ssionate appointment consequentupon the deathofaneniployeeServi[igiu1pieState, , . btitioner categorically stated that, th.e death 3n 8-1-2000 i.e.affer 1-11-1997 aud not earlier. It is farfher submitte'|d ffaat iu batch of cases bearfng .W.P. No: 1322/2002 iuvolving ttie sanjie question orders have been passed by ftiis Court on 20/12/2005. He pra}(s fhat similar brders niay be passed in tbis case also. I • ' Leanied counsel for the State does not dispute the above fact aiid states ttiat the State of Chhatti^garh has taken a decisibn to consider fhe cases of dependants of fhose e^aplpyees wtio died ou orafter 1/11/1997 strictly m accoriance wifh fhe policy pi-evalent at fhat tune. He however subiaits that four inonths tnne f(^r issuing necessarr orders uiav be given. In view ofthe subuussion^ made by leanied counsel appearing forttie pai-ties,. witliout expressing aayj opinion on the laerits offhe case, iu. tiie opinion of this Court, euds ofj4stlce wfll be served ifa directiou is given to fhe Stafe of'CbhattisgarU aad Itlie authorities conGemed to consider aud decide ttie case of.fhe petitione^ in accordance with the policy prevalent at fh.e tiine pfdeathoffhe eiuploye^ concei-D.ed. Iftlie petitipnerfound eUgibfe, appoiataient oriers will be issujed as early as possible preferably within 4 luonfhs from. fbe date of prodifction/receipt of a copy of fhis order. The petitioner is also directed to i-ea^er due co-operation to fhe aufhorities. It is stiU reinauis, fhe petitioner niay avail fhe inade clear ttiat if any grievanc' remedv ayailable under the law, Court. order to the respondents for con^ includiug filiag of the petition before this. Wifh. the aforesaid obseni'ajtions, this petition stands disposedof. Ccrtified copy as per rules^ C-opy to the State couns^l, whp will be ohUged to'conimuaicate the pliaiice. Sd;- Fakhruddin Judge [^tf^