IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4938 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 1.12.2010. Rakesh Jain and another ....Petitioners Versus Habibul Rehman ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahesh Grover Present:- None. MAHESH GROVER, J (Oral) No one is present on behalf of petitioners despite the fact that the case was called twice. On 9.8.2010 this Court had adjourned the matter to enable the counsel for the petitioners to provide the particulars of Rent Petition which the petitioners wanted to be decided expeditiously. The matter was adjourned to 11.8.2010 on which date no one appeared despite the fact that the case was called twice and then the case was adjourned to 27.10.2010. The petitioners then moved a Civil Miscellaneous Application for preponement of the case which was declined on 26.8.2010. The matter was then adjourned to 27.10.2010 on which date a request was made to adjourn the proceedings which prayer was accepted and the matter was adjourned to today. No one has come present today. The prayer made in the petition is that the Rent Petition pertaining to the petitioners and the respondent pending in the Court of Ms. Paramjit Kaur, Rent Controller, Chandigarh, be decided expeditiously. After due consideration I am of the opinion that the prayer of the petitioners cannot be answered for the above reason that no particulars of the petition has been given and neither any case is being made out in the petition regarding undue delay being caused in the proceedings. The petitioner has also not complied with the order dated 9.8.2010 and his subsequent conduct also reveals that there is no serious effort to prosecute the case. Consequently, the revision petition is dismissed. (MAHESH GROVER) 1.12.2010 JUDGE Reema