IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 7TH JUNE 2007 / 17TH JYAISHTA 1929 RP.No. 398 of 2007(J) in OP 35162/02 --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.35162/2002 .................... PETITIONER/5TH RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------ SHINY VARGHESE, AGED 30 YRS, H.S.A.(SOCIAL SCIENCE), M.A.HIGH SCHOOL, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. SUMY GEORGE, H.S.A. MATHEMATICS, M.A.HIGH SCHOOL, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF KERALA, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, TRIVANDRUM. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALUVA. 5. MANAGER, M.A.HIGH SCHOOL, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.R.B.KAIMAL(SR.) THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Antony Dominic, J. ======================== R.P.No.398 of 2007 in O.P.No.35162 of 2002 ======================== Dated this the 7th day of June, 2007. ORDER This Review Petition is filed by the fifth respondent in the Original Petition. It is stated that in the nature of the relief that was granted, quashing Ext.P10 in its entirety was not necessary. Having heard counsel for the petitioner in the Original Petition and the Government Pleader and after having perused the judgment, I am also satisfied that counsel for the review petitioner is justified in his submission. 2. In the circumstances, it is clarified that Ext.P10 is quashed only to the extent it deals with the request of the petitioner in the Original Petition for considering her case for accommodation in the vacancy which arose for the period from 5.6.2000 to 3.10.2000 and from 1.1.2001 onwards as a result of the resignation of Smt. Princy. Review Petition is disposed of as above. Antony Dominic, Judge. ess 7/6