IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 22ND FEBRUARY 2011 / 3RD PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 5569 of 2011(U) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- A.V. RAJAMMA, D/O. SAROJINI, KANJIRAVILAYIL VEEDU, ULAVAKADU KARAYIL, PALAMEL VILLAGE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.S.MOHANAN RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. P. MUTHAIAH, S/O.CHINNAYYAPPA THEVAR, DOOR NO.11, A.A ROAD, MADURAI 16, TAMIL NADU 636016. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, DR. JAYALALITHA TRANSPORT CORPORATION, MADRAS, TAMIL NADU, PRESENTLY KNOWN AS STATE EXPRESS TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD. (SETC TN LTD.), TAMIL NADU. 636001. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: vk P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J -------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.5569 OF 2011 -------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of February 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner is seeking for intervention of this Court for executing the amount of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mavelikara as per Ext.P1 Award. 2. Both the respondents are in Tamilnadu. The first respondent was the driver of the vehicle concerned, which involved in the accident and the second respondent is the owner. Because of the accident occurred, the son of the petitioner sustained serious injuries and he succumbed to the same, which led to the claim petition before the Tribunal, culminating in Ext.P1 Award, whereby the petitioner has been awarded an amount of Rs.3,41,000/- with interest as specified. It is stated that the petitioner has already approached the Tribunal by filing Ext.P3 execution petition and the same is pending. 3. It is open for the petitioner to seek for appropriate reliefs before the Tribunal. This Court does not find it fit and proper to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction by entertaining this Writ Petition, more so, against the respondents who are in Tamil Nadu. W.P.(C) No.5569/2011 - 2 - Reserving the rights and liberties of the petitioner to proceed with further steps as above, interference is declined and the Writ Petition is dismissed. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE vdv