IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 11541 of 2009 Between: 1 S. Chinna Lakshmamma, D/o. S. Chinna Pullappa, R/o. Itukulapall Vllage, Ananthapur Mandal, Ananthapur District. 2 S. Bhagya Lakshmi, D/o. S. Pothanna, R/o. Itukulapall Vllage, Ananthapur Mandal, Ananthapur District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Station House Officer, Itukalapalli Police Station, Itukalapalli, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District. 2 S. Narayanamma, W/o. S. Obulesu, jR/o. Itukulapalli Village, Ananthapur Mandal, Ananthapur District. RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for respondent No.1: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1 in interfering with the civil disputes in respect of Acs. 5.00 and Acs.2.45 cents comprised in Survey Nos. 331/1 and 321/2 respectively of Itukalapalli Village, Ananthapur District as illegal and unconstitutional. In the counter-affidavit filed by the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, Itukalapalli Police Station, Ananthapur District, it is, inter alia, stated that as the Station House Officer is on leave, he is filing the counter-affidavit. He further stated that respondent No.1 never interfered in the civil disputes and he also denied issuance of any possession certificate to the petitioners. The allegation of the petitioners that they were summoned to the police station on 06-06- 2009 and that they were directed not to enter the above mentioned lands is also denied. He reiterated that respondent No.1 never interfered in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the third parties. The categorical assertion of respondent No.1 made through the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, Itukalapalli Police Station, Ananthapur District is placed on record and the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to seek appropriate action against respondent No.1 by filing a representation before the Superintendent of Police, Ananthapur District, if he interferes in the civil disputes in future. As a sequel to disposal of main petition as infructuous, WPMP No.14851 of 2009 filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 22nd June, 2009 kl/vrn