CP 1288/11 2.9.2011 The order dated 17.1.11, of which disobedience/ contempt is alleged, in its initial part records only submissions of counsel of either side. Non compliance of submissions does not result in Contempt of Court. Non compliance with an undertaking may amount to Contempt of Court, but these submissions in no way amount to any kind of undertaking before the Court. The operative portion of order dated 17.1.11 merely says that respondents shall give effect to the order dated 30.9.2010. The order dated 30.9.2010 only says and means that if any process of recruitment is initiated by the respondents no. 1 to 3 in regard to the posts in question, only then the candidature of the appellants shall also be considered subject to their submitting an application. It is not the case of the applicants that any process of recruitment has been initiated by the respondents no. 1 to 3 in respect of the posts in question, therefore, this contempt petition is totally misconceived and is dismissed. (Sushil Harkauli) (K.K. Trivedi) Acting Chief Justice Judge