THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.7184 of 2011 ORDER: Petitioner approaches this Court with a prayer to direct the 2nd respondent-Police not to arrest him, in connection with Crime No.83 of 2007 of Jaggaiahpet Police Station, Krishna District, which is registered for the offences punishable under Sections 326 read with 34 IPC. Heard. The main grievance of the petitioner herein is that he is neither an accused nor the person who is shown as A.4 in the above said Crime. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that originally the person who was arrayed as accused arrested and subsequently released on bail on executing a bond with one surety. Since the said accused is absconding, the police personnel are trying to arrest the petitioner herein and shown him as A.4 in the above said Crime No.83 of 2007. The learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to substantiate any such threat of arrest by the 2nd respondent-police, except the contentions raised in the affidavit filed in support of the petition filed herein. Therefore, this Court is of the view that such a direction cannot be given by invoking the provision under Section 482 of Cr.P.C without knowing who is the real accused in this case. Further, it is not the duty of this Court to enquire into all these things by invoking the provisions under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. More over, the petitioner can avail other alternative remedy. It is the regular procedure to be followed by the police and also by the courts at the time of arrest and production of the accused before it and on such production, the identification marks of the person who is arrested as an accused will be mentioned in the arrest warrant and also in the remand warrant. If there is any arrest by the 2nd respondent-police, the petitioner is at liberty to inform the same to the concerned court that he is not the person concerned and the trial court shall verify his name, identification marks with the Arrest Card and Remand Warrant. On such verification, the trial court can decide wither the petitioner is the person who was arrested in the earlier occasion or a different person is arrested by the 2nd respondent-police. Hence, this Court is not inclined to pass any orders as prayed by the petitioner herein at this stage. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. _________________ RAJA ELANGO,J Date:18.08.2011. Note: Issue CC by 20.8.2011. B/o. Gk. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.7184 of 2011 Date: 18.08.2011 Gk.