S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3709/2008 Narayan Vs. Labour Court, Bhilwara & Anr. Date of Order :: 11.7.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. N.K. Chandak, for the petitioner. ... By this petition for writ a challenge is given to the award dated 15.11.2006 passed by the labour court negativing the claim made by the workman. The labour court by considering the entire evidence available on record gave a specific finding that the workman did not complete continuous services as defined under Section 25 B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and as such, there was no need to adhere the mandatory conditions precedent. I have examined the award impugned. As per the petitioner the labour court has not appreciated the statements of witness Rama who has said that the workman was in continuous service of the employer. As a matter of fact in cross-examination Rama has said that he is not aware of the period for which the petitioner-workman was employed. The finding of fact given under the award is not required to be interfered if it is not perverse. I do not find any case warranting interference of this Court under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, this petition for writ is dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Jgoyal