1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.1143 OF 2005 Parle Products Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Ms.L. Bachhani for the Petitioner. Mr.C. R. Sonawane, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 5. ..... CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, J. AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. February 8, 2006. P.C. On account of passage of time, the Learned Counsel states that no purpose would be served in pursuing the petition as goods are perishable goods. In the light of that, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. In so far as the goods are concerned, the Learned AGP has no objection to the Petitioners destroying the goods provided due notice is given to the Food Inspectors, Respondent Nos.3, 4 and 5. It would be open to the Food Inspectors to remain present at the time the goods are being destroyed. Notice shall be of not less than 15 days in advance of the destruction of the goods. 2 ( F.I. Rebello, J.) (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)