IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40204 of 2010 BIRENDRA PANDEY & ORS . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02/ 10-Nov-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners have prayed for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 341, 323, 447, 384, 427, 504/34 of the IPC and Section 3(i) (x) SC ST (Prevention of the Atrocities) Act on the ground that both the parties are co-villagers and the allegations were exaggerated on account of admitted land dispute between the parties. It has further been submitted that subsequently vide Annexure-2 both the parties have filed compromise petition in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar. Considering the aforesaid submissions, this application for anticipatory bail is allowed to the extent that if the petitioners surrender within six weeks and satisfy the court below i.e., the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar that parties have compromised their differences, in that event, the court below shall release 2 the petitioners, namely, 1. BIRENDRA PANDEY, 2. SHATRUGHAN PANDEY AND 3. SANTOSH PANDEY on furnishing bail bond of Rs.7000/- each to the satisfaction of court mentioned above in connection with Brahampur P.S. Case No. 376 of 2009. In case it is found that there has been no compromise between the parties then petitioners’ case for bail shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. perwez ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)