IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8320 of 2011 Anil Kumar, son of late Parsuram Jee, resident of Dahiyama, P.S. Bhagwan Bazar, District Chapra. … Petitioner Versus 1. The Union Of India, through Railway Board, New Delhi 2. The General Manager, N.E. Railway, Gorakhpur 3. The Chief Commercial Manager (Operation), N.E. Railway, Gorakhpur 4. The Divisional Railway Manager, N.E. Railway, Varanasi 5. The Deputy Chief Commercial Manager, N.E. Railway, Gorakhpur 6. The Assistant Commercial Manager, Goods, N.E. Railway, Varanasi … Respondents. --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kamal Nayan Choubey, Sr. Advocate & Mr. Nagendera Dubey, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate --------- 09/ 19.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following reliefs :- (i) Issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to stay the round `O’ clock working system of goods shed/siding at Chapra Junction Railway Station so that the petitioner and others may not suffer more unwarrantedly. (ii) Issuance of orders, directions to the Respondents to not extend further round O clock working system till the proper/adequate facilities provided. (iii) To pass such other orders as may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. So far round `O’ clock working system of goods shed/siding at Chapra Junction Railway Station is concerned, the same is the policy decision of the concerned Department, but the specific claim of the petitioner is that some infrastructures, amenities 2 and requisites, as detailed in paragraph no.9 of this petition, have to be constructed and fulfilled, which are absent at Chapra Junction Railway Station. 4. Although learned counsel for the respondents vehemently opposes the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner, but this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move the General Manager of North East Railway (respondent no. 2) along with an application giving reasons and details of his claim as has been raised before this Court. If such an application is filed by the petitioner along with a copy of this order before the said authority within four weeks, the said authority shall consider the said application in accordance with the provisions of law and the case laws applicable to the facts and circumstances of this case and shall decide it expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months of the filing of such application. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J.)