v' HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Jagdish Bhalla, Ag. C.J. Writ Petition (Cl No. 4318 of 2007 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Vs 1. 2. 3. Navin Sahu, aged about 30 yeare, son of Late Maniram Sahu, resident of village Mangla, behind Janpad Panohayat Primary School- Mangla, Tahsi] Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) Smt Kamlesh Sahu, aged about 27 years, wife of Navin Sahu Ku.Mili Sahu, aged about2 yeare, D/o Navin Sahu, through natural guardian - Smt Kamlesh Sahu, aged about 27 years, wife of Navin Sahu, Both are at presert resided at Maszidpara - Kota Tahsil and PS Kota DistBilaspur (CG) The Registrar Qeneral, High Court of Chhattisgarh, Biiaspur (CG) Wnt Petition under Article 227 ofthe Constitution of India. Present: Shri Pawan Kesharwani, counsel for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 26m July, 2007) IA No.2 for taking certified copy of the order dated 14.05.2007 is allowed and the oertified copy is taken on record. In this petition the Registrar General, High Courtof Chhattisgarh has been impleaded as respondent No.3 on the ground that a complaint was filed against a judioial offioer in this case. 1 do not find that Registrar General is a necessary party in this case, and accordingly, the Registrar General, High Court of Chhattisgarh is direoted to be deleted from the cause title. This petition is directed against the order dated 21.05.2007 passed by the Family Court Bilaspur in MJC No.27/2007, whereby the maintenance of Rs.2,500/- per month has been awarded to the wife and tiA/o year old daughter for their needs. iy. i; EiSi ;Cb, jyo 2- It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the amount fixed is on the higher side. He has to look after his mother and younger brother, whereas his .wife has to look after only their daughter. Prima facie sltuation has been created due to out fall of the matrimonial relations, therefore, the wife has prayed for maintenance under Section 125 ofthe Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned oounsel for the petitioner could not indicate any ground on the basis of which the order passed by the Family Court oan be set aside. Accordingly, no interference is called fbr with the impugned order under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Thus the petition being devoid of substance is hereby dismissed. Sd/- Jagdish Bhalla Judge ^-