IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1350 of 2011 MAHESH KUMAR @ MAHESHWARI MEHTA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11.02.2011 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner’s name sprang up on the confessional statement of co-persons and the charge sheeted accused has been acquitted during trial. The investigation is still pending against the petitioner since case was instituted in 1994. I am not inclined to enlarge him on anticipatory bail. Let the learned Court below consider for regular bail of the petitioner, considering the fact that petitioner’s name sprang up on the confessional statement of the co-accused, preferably on the same day, if the petitioner surrender before learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today. The application of the petitioner is disposed off. 2 Let the copy of order be communicated to the learned Court below through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. Bhardwaj ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)