IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2433 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : February 11, 2010. Radhika .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Dr.M.L.Sachdeva, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Mr.B.S.Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the nature of the order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to seek any counter reply on behalf of the respondents at this stage. The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the respondents to promote her as Lecturer (School Cadre) in terms of the revised Government Instructions dated 21.8.2009 read with order dated 26.8.2009 (Annexure P-14) passed by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No.10318 of C.W.P.No .2433 of 2010 (O&M) 2 2009 (M eena Rani versus State of Punjab and others). The petitioner's' case is that she has been deprived of the promotion for want of 50% positive results and since the said condition has now been relaxed by the Government of Punjab vide the revised Instructions dated 21.8.2009, her claim deserves to be re-considered. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner in terms of the revised Government Instructions dated 21.8.2009 and in case it finds favour, she be promoted from the date her juniors were promoted with all consequential benefits. Needful shall be done within a period of 4 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Disposed of. Dasti. 11-02-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE