IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44757 of 2008 AMAR PASWAN, son of Sri Suresh Paswan, resident of village Ishopur, P.S. Phulwarisharif, District Patna …..Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite party ----------- For the Petitioner :Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State :Mr. R.B. Roy ‘Raman’, A.P.P. 04/ 12.12.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code, which was registered against unknown. He has been implicated in this case at the instance of co-accused, Rohit Kumar on the basis of his confessional statement, which also led to recovery of the stolen Television set. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that besides the present case and one Beur P.S. Case No. 100 of 2008 registered for the offence under Sections 379 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code, there is no third case pending against him. Co- accused, Rohit Kumar, who implicated the petitioner, has not yet been released on bail. Considering the fact that the petitioner is a signatory to the seizure list prepared after recovery of the television set as also the fact that co-accused Rohit Kumar, who implicated him, has not yet been released on bail, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected, however, with liberty to apply for grant of bail in June, 2009. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)