IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 614 of 2009 Date of Decision: 17.2.2009. Brij Bhushan Sharma ---Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others ---Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. A.K. Walia, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab has been asked to accept the notice on behalf of respondents-State. Copy furnished. The petitioner is working as Pujari and seeks promotion to the post of Supervisor. It is alleged that the said post is lying vacant since 31.1.2001 and petitioner is the senior most Pujari. His claim for the promotion has not been considered by the respondents. Petitioner filed a representation (Annexure P-6), which has also not been considered till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied if the respondents are directed to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner. In view of the above circumstances, respondent no.3 is directed to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the competent authority. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, it shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. Disposed of as such. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 17.2.2009 lucky