IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2009 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1930 RP.No. 268 of 2009(B) --------------------- W.P.(C).33828/2008 OF THIS COURT REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER PENASION EMPLOYEE'S PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, CHALAKUZHY BUILDING, KOTTAYAM. 2. HE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEE'S PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN,KOTTAYAM BY ADV. SRI.N.N. SUGUNAPALAN, SC, P.F. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. BHASKARAN, PROVIDENT FUND ACCOUNT NO. KR/112/1899, NOII DIV LONE TREE ESTATE, LONE TREE P.O., UPPUTHARA 685 505, IDUKKI DIST. 2. THE PEERMEDU TEA COMPANY, REP. BY S.K. STEPHEN, SECTION OFFICER, LONE TREE ESTATE, SECTION OFFICER, LONE TREE ESTATE, FAIR FIELD P.O., ELAPPARA 685 501 IDUKKI DIST. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J ------------------- R.P.268/2009 in W.P.(C).33828/08 -------------------- Dated this the 13th day of March, 2009 ORDER Review petition has been filed by respondents 1 and 2 essentially aggrieved by the statement in paragraph 5 of the judgment wherein it is observed that the total number of days in service, and break in service were earlier calculated on the basis of the statement forwarded by the first respondent. It is submitted that the statement was forwarded to the first respondent by the employer and it is the said statement which was later acknowledged to be erroneous. Judgment reads as if the statement was forwarded by the first respondent. Submission is correct. I heard learned counsel for the writ petitioner also in this regard. Review petition accordingly, is disposed of clarifying that the statement detailing the number of days in service and break in R.P.268/2009 2 service relating to the writ petitioner referred to in paragraph 5 of the judgment is one which is forwarded to the first respondent by the second respondent. Judgment in question dated 21.11.2008 shall be read accordingly. V.GIRI, Judge mrcs