THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1066 of 2011 ORDER: The respondent filed O.S.No.458 of 2008 against the petitioner in the Court of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool for foreclosure of the mortgage. The petitioner was set ex parte and an ex parte preliminary decree was passed on 29.03.2010. The petitioner filed I.A.No.575 of 1020 under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C. with a prayer to set aside the ex parte decree. The trial Court allowed the I.A. through order, dated 03.03.2011, setting aside the ex parte decree, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit one-fourth of the decretal amount i.e. Rs.22,996/- on or before 25.03.2011. The petitioner feels aggrieved by the condition imposed by the trial Court. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Having regard to the nature of the order, which the Court intends to pass, it is felt that it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondent. The petitioner does not challenge the condition imposed by the trial Court while setting aside the ex parte decree. His grievance is only about the adequacy of time. This Court is of the view that the petitioner can be permitted to pay one-fourth of the decretal amount in two instalments. Hence, the civil revision petition is disposed of, directing that the petitioner shall be entitled to deposit the amount of Rs.22,996/- in two instalments in such a way that he shall deposit a sum of Rs.12,000/- by 11.04.2011 and the balance of amount by 25.04.2011. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt: 25.03.2011. Note: Issue cc by Monday. (B/o) Kdl