^ ^~ 3Ii IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl No. ^^ /2009 6 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS , -^.'A-^Y.?-"' ^^^" -••".^^'o.^"' ^•-':^^"-y:'- Suit. Suinan Siagh W/o Shri Suresh Kumar Singh, aged about 29 years, resident of Tahsil Udaipur, Post Udaipur, District Sarguja (C.G.) VERSUS 1. * The State of Chliattisgarh Through: Secretary, Panchayat Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. ^Chief Executive Officer, ZUa Panchayat, District Sarguja (C.G.) r" 3. Goveminent Girls Higher School, fhrough: Principal, Govemment Girls Higher Secondary School, Sarguja (C.G.) 4. Govemm.ent Higher Secondary School, through: Principal Government Higher Secondary School, Nawanagar Ainbikapur District Sarguja (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 's^ HIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 3435 OF 2009 PETITIONER Smt. Suman Singh Versus RESPONDENTS TheState of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constttution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. : Present:- Shri P.S.Koshy with Shri Vaibh®/Shukia, Advocates for the petitioner. - Shri Ajit Singh, Panei Lawyer for the State. ORDER . ..:. :' . i " .. ; (Passed on this 26°' day of Septsmber, 2011) 1. 3. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petiticmer submits that by orcter dated 25.05.2009 (Annexure P-2), the petitioner was appointed as Shiteha Karmi Grade-1 for the English subject and was posted at Govt. Girte High School, Udaipur, and vide order dated 06.07.2009 (Annexure P/1), the posting order ofthe petitioner has been modified and she has been post^l aS Govt. Higher Secpndary Schoo!, Nawanagar, Ambikapur. However, by virtue of order dated 15.07.2009, the order dated 06.07,2009, which is impugned herein could not be given effect to, wherein this Court directed to stay the effect and operation of the impugned order. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is continuing at the original place of sshok Since more than two years have passed and in view of the order dated 15.07.2009, the petitioner is continuing at the original place of posting; thus, it is not necessary to go jnto the merits ofthe case atthis stage. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the Sovernment may be granted liberty to pass a fresh order without insislSng on complianceof order dated 06.07.2009, in respect ofthe petitioner. In view of the above submission, according to leamed (»unsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication atthis stage. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforestated observation and liberty, if SQ advised. ___----—---_, Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge 1