IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Second Appeal No. 594/2006 Madhukar@Vyankat through LRs Smt. Ramadevi M. Patil Bolenwar & ors ..vs. Shri Kisanrao Jagannath Nemanwar & another. __________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Shri Amol Mardikar, Advocate for the appellants. Shri S. J. Khandalkar, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 2. CORAM : C.L Pangarkar, J. DATED : 13/03/2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This second appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law. (1) Whether the Courts below committed an error in holding that the case was governed by Section 14 (1) of the Hindu Succession Act, when partition deed at Exhibit 30 clearly mentions restricted estate to Gopikabai ? Civil Application No. 2382 of 2007 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The appellants have filed this appeal challenging the alienation made by Gopikabai in favour of respondent Nos. 1 & 2. The appeal has been admitted. In these circumstances, it is desirable that the parties shall maintain status quo with regard to property. In view of this, it is necessary to direct respondents not to alienate the property during the pendency of this appeal. The application stands disposed of. JUDGE. Jsa