IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No. 9010 of 2004 Shri Sanjay Baban Gophane ..Petitioner vs. 1. State of Maharashtra & ors. ..Respondents Shri A.M.Joshi for petitioner. Shri S.K.Chinchalikar, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 2 Shri V.D.Borwarkar for respondent no.3. CORAM: S.B.MHASE J. CORAM: S.B.MHASE J. CORAM: S.B.MHASE J. 8th August,2006 8th August,2006 8th August,2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Shri Joshi. Perused the order. 2. Since the petitioner was Shikshan Sevak his terminmation proceedings were not entertained by the School Tribunal and it has been rightly directed that the petitioner should approach the Committee dealing with such problems of the Shikshan Sevaks. Shri Joshi apprehends that even the petitioner’s appeal to the committee will be thrown away by the said Committee and his grievances will not be ventilated. The learned Counsel states that the petitioner had approached the said Committee but he will be nowhere if his application there is disposed of being the committee not having the jurisdiction. Normally in such matters such questions may not arise. But for whatsoever reasons unfortunaely if the view taken by the said committee that it has no jurisdiction to entertain the matter of the petitioner, he is at liberty to approach this Court. With this liberty in favour of the petitioner the petition is disposed of. (S.B.MHASE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.)