HIGHCOURT OFCHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W.P.(S)No.768/2007 Jagmohan Verma, S/o Khuman Prasad Verma, Aged about 37 years, R/o Sargipal Para, Near Church, Kondagaon, District Bastar(C.G.) 1 State (..."Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Panchayst & Grsmln ViKas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 Director, Panchayat & Gramln Vikas Vibhag, Raipur (CG) 3 Collector, Bastar, District Bastar (C.G.) 4 Block Education Officer, Btock Kondagaon, DisSrict Bastar (CG) 5 Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Bastar, District Bastar (C.G.) ^•^Si^w i i i W3 iW?i'B %^r i flr. Sumesh Bajaj, Gover ts. the petitioner. ent Advocate for thi (14.07.2010) ii-7 -* Petitioner -Jagmohan Verma has fiied this petition following reliefs: That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 13.12.2006 passed by the respondent No.4 (P-2). W.P.tS) No.768/2007 r 7.2 7.3 That, this Hon'Dle Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records from the possession of the respondents in respect of the instant case. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case. in substance was fited for order dated 13.12.2006 passed by respondent No.4. By the sajd order, the petitioner and other persons were attached to different instltutlons for performing education work for a particular session 2006-07. It was also specifically mentioned in the order that after completion of would go back to their respective institutions. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after fiting of the writ petition, an interim order was passed in favour of the petitioner on 15.03.2007 and the impugned order, so far as ft relates to the petitibner, was not given effect to on accounf of interim order passed by this Court. He submits that the period contained in the order dated 13.12.2006 has elapsed, therefore, the petition, now, has This factuat position is not opposed by learned particularly, 11 do not deem above facts and view of the reliefs souc appropriate to proceed petition, therefore, is nfructuous by afflux of time. order as to costs. of the case, tne writ petition, in thls matter. dfsposed of, having Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge llyw. ff