IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 16950 of 2011 Date of Decision: 12.09.2011 Harwinder Singh ..Petitioner Versus State Transport Commissioner, Punjab and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: Mr. P.S.Bawa, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that permit granted to Tirath Singh (respondent No.3) stood expired in 2008 and has never been renewed, however, the authorities are permitting respondent No. 3 to ply the vehicle without any permit. The petitioner has got issued a legal notice (Annexure P/7), however, no decision has been taken thereon, therefore, respondent No.2 be directed to decide the same, within such time as fixed by this Court. Without expressing any opinion on the merit as well as on the maintainability of the legal notice (Annexure P/7), respondent No. 2 is directed to take decision thereon within 60 days from the date certified copy of this order is placed before him, in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE 12.09.2011 som