IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: July 06, 2011 1. Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-2613 of 2011 (O &M) Jagmohan Singh Kala & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . 2. Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-2614 of 2011 (O & M) Jagdeep Singh & others .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. R.V.S. Chugh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. None for respondent Nos.2 to 6. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) Crl. Misc. No. M-2613 of 2011 [2] 1. This shall dispose of two petitions viz. Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-2613 of 2011 titled ‘Jagmohan Singh Kala & others vs. State of Punjab & others’ and Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-2614 of 2011 titled ‘Jagdeep Singh & others vs. State of Punjab & others’. 2. The two petitions pray for quashing FIR No.50 dated 19.11.2010 under Sections 307, 341, 148, 149 IPC and Sections 25 & 27 of Arms Act, Police Station, Belongi, District SAS Nagar Mohali; and the cross version recorded in the FIR, above mentioned, respectively. 3. Perusal of the FIR, placed on record as Annexure P-1, indicates that more than 10 persons came armed with pistol, rifle, swords and sticks. One shot was fired, with intention to kill, on Innova Car. Then one person fired shot from his .12 bore gun which hit the front wind screen of the car. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has informed the Court that Jasdeep Singh received a fire-arm injury. 5. The manner in which the offences have been committed, does not call for interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR and the cross–version. Quashing of such FIR cases would not be in the interest of justice. 6. Both the petitions are accordingly dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) July 06, 2011 JUDGE avin Crl. Misc. No. M-2613 of 2011 [3] 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?