cp82.08.odt 1 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Contempt Petition No. 82 of 2008 In L.P.A. No. 216 of 2007 in W.P. No. 2998 of 1996 ( Vasudeo s/o Ananda Zambre ..vs.. Shri Murlidhar s/o Raoji Pawar and another ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders Mr. A.M. Ghare, Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. V.G. Wankhede, Advocate for the respondents 1 & 2. Coram: R. K. Deshpande, J. Date : April 12 th , 2010 1. It is not in dispute that the order of which the contempt is complained of has been fully complied with. However, the only grievance raised by the learned Advocate for the petitioner is that it is highly belated compliance and the respondents have been causing harassment to the petitioner on one count or the other and the delay caused in compliance with the order is only for the reasons that the respondents were engaged in harassing the petitioner. 2. The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have filed an affidavit tendering unconditional apology. Though it is a belated compliance, I am not inclined to proceed with the contempt proceedings against the respondents. The cp82.08.odt 2 . unconditional apology tendered by the respondents is accepted. The contempt proceedings are dropped. However, keeping in view of the conduct of the respondents, they shall pay the cost of Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today. JUDGE adgokar