KBP 1 ca39-11.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.39 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.383 OF 1993 [Vijay Vs. Laxmibai] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.V.S.Gokhale, for applicant. Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni, for respondent nos.1, 2a, 2b, 2d, 2e, 3a, 3b, 3d, 3e and 3f. CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 3 rd MAY, 2011 P.C. Heard Mr.V.S.Gokhale, learned counsel for applicant and Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni, learned counsel for respondent nos.1, 2a, 2b, 2d, 2e, 3a, 3b, 3d, 3e and 3f. Office remark shows that respondent nos.2c, 2f and 3c are served. Leave to amend and add prayer clause (a­1) for condonation of delay. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. This is an application for condonation of delay and for bringing heirs and legal representatives of respondent nos.2 and 3, since deceased, on record. Respondent 2 – Laxminarayan expired on 18 th September, 2002 leaving behind respondent no.1 Laxmibai as one of the heirs and legal representatives KBP 2 ca39-11.odt among others. Respondent no.3 Shankar expired on 30 th October, 2006 leaving behind respondent no.1 Laxmibai as one of the heirs and legal representatives among others. For the reasons set out in the application, I am satisfied that the applicant has made out sufficient cause for condoning the delay. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (a­1) with no order as to costs. Amendment to be carried out within eight weeks from today. [ R.G.KETKAR, J. ]