\:v. c^}€rz2-— s IN THE HON*BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER -J RESPONDENTS J^? r<f// ^w w ^/.. ^' / y J <" W.P.(S) No.^1^ Of 2010 ; ' Kuraari Kalyani Yadu S^€>. Late Shri Khemlal Yadu, aged about 45 years, Assistant Teacher. Government Primary School, Satnamipara, Fingeshwar, Block Fingeshwar, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Versus : 1 ^ The State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary School Education Department Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, G.E.Road, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) :2) District Education Officer, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) :3) Smt. Tulika Pandey, wife of not known, Teacher Government Middle School, Pandaritaraee, Block Dharsinva, Distt. Raipur(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDEI^ ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA -HC—78 <41*1CTI ^lW^ '3^r ^i^Krj^ ynl^^Ko, [®ldt-(-l!j,-(. ..U.t:.^.....^:.6.1.^. .200 ^I^T ^T5R5l (<l°lf^<i^) ^?1^T ^T 1<;1W wiw^T^rt^ 1?^TTWR^13^^T S^j_MOrBLB_MR._JUSTICE,PR!TEi 27.10.2010 Shri K.S.Pawar, counsel for S'hri Ajit Siagh, P.L. for the Grievance of the pctitioner has preferred a represeiitatioR a| fbe same has not been decided tiU Counsel for the petitioner fannexure P-1) froiii which it is placed over aad above ttie respoi the petition that the petitioxier hoJ aiid belongs to OBC category, petitioner is tliat she has never adverse reinark nor asiy DeparttE till date she has not been piinishe In view of fhe averment xn^ that junior to the petitioner has b] petitioner submits fhat he may petition witli liberty to 'file repij N0.2. He furfh.er submits tli.at. c.ircunistaiices^ tliis Court ha| 23.8.2010 (Annexure P-5) iri considering tlie said order, the re^ to decide fhe representation of th^ law. 4)i^^^ "^P^if ^f 'fe%t <F»1^l< ^^tftm^i^r KER.DIWAKER the petitioner. State. lis fh.at th.ough fh.e petitioner (grieved. by her siipei-sessiosi, da.te. referred to the gradation list found fhat the petitiouer is .dent No.3. It is also steted io. ds quali&cation ofM,A., D.Ed, . Fiirther coutentioxi of the beeu commuuicated with ajay ental Enqiiiry is penduig aad d by the department, ide .iii this petition it appears "en promoted. Couiisel for the »e pennitted to withdraw thi,s. ssenta..tion before respondent alm.ost in sifEiilar fects arid s passed ttie order dated V.P.(S) No. 4746/2010 and .pondent No,2 niay be d.irected petitioner m. acconlaiice with "s^ '^\ \ -.A r\ ''aK^ -j 'y/ '^-. J£$4lC-78 'S'ST ^STPTT^R, ^•fll'(-i<!<o, fsi<nw*^< ^y Nr*«»ir(f»^{^9 . u-^^ ^•••••••^i^ 200 ^n^i TT5R? (<i?*t^<si<i^) 3Tr^[^7Tl^TW ^TT^II^T^TRW '^nw^^^Ti^i Accordiiigly, flie petitioner| petition with liberty to file pro| respoiident N0.2 within tliree w^ copy of this order aixd ia tum. it authority to decide the repre^eiitation possible preferably wifhin three ofcopy offhe said represeutation|. is pemiitted to withdravv tliis |3er repi^sentation before tlie |eks froni fhe date of receipt of ls expected froin the conipeteiit ;^eiitation as expeditiously as dioxiths from t'he date of receipt If grievars.ee of fhe petition^ open to flie petitioner to take available to her under fhe law. ^l^fd^l^ '^R^ff'^ fs^ <f^1^1< i?3>ifiR^i^?T T is not redressed, it would be recourse to siich rem.edy as Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge