IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12098 of 2011 Irfan Irani @ Irfan Arni, S/O-Late Md. Yusuf Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 15.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Admittedly, informant is not an eye-witness of the alleged occurrence rather she came to know about the alleged occurrence on the basis of a document which is said to be written by the injured but the aforesaid document is not on the case diary. Furthermore, in course of investigation, when Investigating Officer went to record the statement of injured, it is stated at Para-31 of the case diary that again the injured wrote about the incident disclosing this fact that this petitioner had opened fire on him as a result of which he sustained injury on his neck. Although, the above stated facts have specifically been mentioned at Para-31 of the case diary but it is surprising enough that the aforesaid document has not been attached by the Investigating Officer with the case diary. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 152 of 2010. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)