IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36272 of 2008 Surjeet Singh @ Bhola Singh, son of Late Bacchan Singh, resident of village- Hanuman Charahi, P.S. Khaira and District- Jamui. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar. 2. Subhas Kumar Singh, son of Parmanand Singh, resident of village Sonpey, P.S. and District- Jamui. .. Opposite Parties. ----------- 2. 14.07.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is specific period to take cognizance under Section406, 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the matter arises with respect to business transaction. The complainant has not produced the single piece of document to indicate that he had contacted to petitioner for purchase of the truck. All these aspect of the matter be raised by the petitioner at the stage of framing of charges. As for the present, the Court has to consider the prima facie evidence and take cognizance in the matter. There is no illegality in the order impugned. This application is dismissed. Md. Ibrarul (Sheema Ali Khan ,J.)