.3. X!I-189(JaiI)CJ.P.R-;9-94 iL No.; -.. . _* ^ _ ^l^n... .Name ^•- '> _"l< .__/"'> 5^~- ~-- ^FE^ ^-Tt^ ^ ^ 1^ .tl 'c^l 0^~| e| cg l e^q.. Father's name . *\ f\ rs < ce a4=M-"^^\,^w-^^\—°—^Wr— Sentenced to-ftr^T" -^i-%^-^- -?-srs-q~^ on '^, t. C\^. QiQ._JL-^——»-?>/ aSTT—^lu-airii <T--I y ^*-^- \/(^ .jy .^^^ j^j o-<i)^llfl Under Section "SQS-lfi:. / ^T^d[-:T-^%%by&f5<'%T^t52li '^^•^SS&^'t*T ^"VL •^re^n-if^^ ;l:r''";'; , • Tt is explained:to the priscper that ifhe states he Wishes to be.represented; hy a: iegal ; ; . practifioiieT the appellate Court will not proceed with the case for sevendays unless the iegal practitioner appears earlier. Tf'the lega] practition§rdoes riot appear within sevea days he may aot heard at all if the Prisoner states tha't he does not wish to be repre- sented by legal practitioner the court may proceed af once with the case and will hot be obliged.to give a hearing to my legal practitioner whp should appear. . i Dateof Application forcopy ofJudgement _ .__ i !:r: 2 Date pn which cppy received 3 Date .on wbich Appeal sent_ Z'7 QB' 19CA 4 Whether the prisoner wishes to be represented. or not \^ 51 No Cilo^^'^f^^il^S ^ame^ Confined in: ^ _' _•_ _ , /-^-\ '' JaiF •/^ Dated For.warded to fhe ^a ^} ^_Q^.199 le<Bf^|< ^<^t,-^^-^ ^, a-t-^^w^^^ ^•<^3-^) Igetherwitii a copy-ofjudgement or orderpassed ia the case forfavour oftransmi- ;-~^ion to the' proper AppeSlate coi}4i  ^ -' —^:.:.i -'BlfilifiQfiii'tetidtB.t-; l1!-^^ Date ofreceipt io _ Office Datepf receipt of record to accompany the of Apgeal to the Appel)&te court Dated Fb.[warded to the Jail 199 1:\ a ef;ieeeipt in- Appellate court XI-HC-78 *11*1MI Sb*1ich 'ssf ^iwiv^, w-^ww, Riditfy ^.a..^.^/^^^ 311^1 4d<h (li°lij°l<liT) 3>,^T^iTf?:TR> (WTSn^TshHl'o n ?TtITSRCTf|sT.3n^T . ^ _. Hon^bie iUir. L-C. Bha Hon'b'e iVlr. Dhirsndite M'shra. -J-J. ynn ADnay ! iwan, Advocate Mr Surihir Bai"si Dy C- A fil Arguments neara. Oraljucigment djctateo on O^ •r L.C.i This appeai is directed again^ OT sentence aatea ai./.iyyB pa^ Manenaragarn, uistrict Mna in q, AaciKionai iiessions Judge aner 04 commission OT tne onence unaer sentencea nim to unaergo impnsonitien Casg oftha prosecution in br\ at about 9.00 p.m. deceased Bhuil wsnt so tne nouse OT PVV--' iark^ ,'arKesnvffir nameiv yuryapraiapl ft.amesnvi@r singn were at tneil u'agarnatn aiong Vvitn aecsasea Bri lamesnwar singn, ai .tnat time a| hoiding battleaxe and anacked'Bflu^ of wnich Bhunesh^var feii dov/n ^ yeing oanisa Jagarnatn enterea tl •informed Tarkeshy»ar, Supyapratapl -. / 3nn anri »biiFti41-<HiticiTfftec3'<Ri«i< i;3Tf^IT3n^T ortne appeilant. rths f9SQondont/-St2ts. s. >t fhejudgmeni ofconvictlon and order Dy Aaciitionai Sessions Judge, .T.No. 332/97, wiiereby the learned 'lding tne accusea'appeiiant guirty'Tor ection W2 OT ine inaian i-'ena! l/ode, n Tor iffe. ief is that In the njaht of 23" Julv 1 987 esnwar aiong v/iin Jagarnatn (HSV-S; snwar aingh, at thai time Drotner of and son of larKesnwar namely resiaence. Aner sometime pvv-s uneshwar came out of the house of ccused cnitrabnan @ Sahiba came lesnwarwsin it on nis necx, as'a resuit nd thereafter, Chitrabhan ran away, le nouse OT i arKesnwar cpying ana ana t^amesnviar singn. un vseim. P.T.O. s! ^ t; 1^^-:^.g I^S^ ^^^B •8 Ifili ^dSj B ^^^^ --XI-HC-78 *<Tff<TTSh*l|ch 3:5T RTPn^fiI', ®TflM'IS,':Rldiy^< IJJ^ .<<%. ^^ .?./ ^^S^q- ^^- Sil^.i'l4ach(>y(^<s|^li)') •Si^r^itR-fisb tWT 3)1^1 sbt<l<* g(<iTWtrf?cT3n^T linrormea Dy Jagarnatn, larKe'snwar lout OT tne nouse ana sa\v tnat Doat |the house of Kameshwar, by that tirr( Iwere caiied and informed. On 24. aeceasea, iarKesnwar lyvv-'z) anci ;nirmiri and loaged tne repon, (PVV-10') registered the Merg (Ex.P/l Kepon (fcx.h'/D vsas registerea. si scene OT occurrence ana aner gn (Ex.P.'S) of the dead body of Bhun| and piain 3011 was taKen into possesj poiice custoay gave memoranaum oTTence i.e. Danieaxe ana in pursu; info possession under Ex;p/12. postmortem examination to Commu) A.K. AaraviBl (PVV-4) condycte< postmortem report (Ex.P/4) in whi4 snocK aue !Q nemorrnage^as a resup ne oameaxe v/as sent to tne aoct<|i nis opinion (fcx.K/5) and opin.ed Bnune.snv/ar couia De causea oy tne| dn Aflercompietion oftiTe. invest uourt OT judiciai iviagistrate Krst U!^s case to tfte sessions Juage, AittDi sessions Judg?, Manenaragarn rec$ ~~1/ ttil<lfcl<fl-1 tf|t]<?lTfffei<;l iFaXAiK ^•^sri^'R'anSsr . ; suryapratap ana Mmesnwar came OT ununeshvifflr v/as lying m front OT (e ne was alreaay aeaa. i ne viiiagers 7.1997 Devpratap (PVV-S), brother of •novAiaar went to ine t^oiice btation W|ereupon Shri C.D. Singh, inspector f[l5). Based on that, Krst inTormation ispector Shri C.D. Singh ieft for the (ing notice to the Panchas, inquest i^snwar was preparea. Biooastainea iion under Ex.P/10. Accused v/hiie in 25./.iay/ regaraing ine weapon OT Ince OT tnai, tne Dattieaxe vias laKen Iboay OT deceased was sent ror |iity Heaith Center, Chirmiri where Dr. postmortem and prepared the (n he oplned inat cause OT death is |it OT injury ana tne same is nomiciaai. ^r Tor nis opinion and tne aoctor gave tnat injunes Touna on ine Doay OT Dattieaxe. igation, cnarge sneet was Tiisa in tne 33, iwanendragarn wno committea tne (apur from v/here learned Acidltional rvea ttie case on iransTerTortnai. P.T.O. 1^:1 i jet iiaaiUuitefa XI-HC-78 3^'^TPfRPT, aTfl'y'16, Rldwy KWMI *4i* •(?'r- <"i!^'-' •^•1-7-W-<-'^- 204. sn^rTgq?('^rfg^T) 31^T?iTf^riqi (P'lTSii^ia'Hiti ?RTTWd1^(T3n^T Qr ne prosecunon in oraer accusea.'appeiiant examined T4 recorded unaer Section .513 oftne appeanng agamst him in tne not commitied the murder of Bhunl offence he v/as worKing s.s labourerl as to vrfho committed trte murdeil therefore, mereiy on the basis of cnme. ilo estabiish the charge against the witrjesses. Statement ofthe accused v«as '.P.C. in which he denied the materiai prosec|utioiy'eviaence ana stateci tnat ne nas i^snwar, at tne time of commission ot I'vAh Tarkeshvi/ar and he is not aware OT ununesnwar as ne is outsider, su|spicion ne nas Deen implicateci in the Learned Additional Sessions respective panies convictea aTorementionea. vvs have neara tihn A&nav tne accusea'appellant anci snn yi|anir Statei'respondent. ynn }iwan, nas not aisputedl iworeover, from the ocular eviden^ evidence of PW-4 Dr. A.K. Agra^ ununesnwar'.vas nomiciaai m naturel As far as involvement ofthe is concernea, snn iivrfan araueatnat attacked the deceased and the ./ impiicated in ^fte crime. *i<<fM41-i wtRrfiffsfv <Ri<^i< ^srf^Tsn^T Judge after hearing counsei for the sentenced tne accusea as iwan, learnea counsei appearing tor Bajpai, learned counsei for the sne nomiciaai aeain or ununesnvi'ar. |:e of P'vV-5 Jagarnath and medicai !, it is estaoiisnea that the aeatn OT lccusea/appeilant in cnme'in question jt in fact the witness J.agarnath (PVV-5) ^ccused/appetiant has been faiseiy P.T.O. a E i3:l XI-HC-78 'sas ^mv\^, vnS\w\6, K\wwy. Ml*4dl **4i<*> •<:^y' •^ • ' • •7"'^^; -ao®- Sll^l 4d* (y?35"^T) 3I^T^Tf^IRi aqr311^1 sb»<iti ?%TWCTf5tTan^T «bi*it<-i'lfl'ftii*iMTfftelA<Ri'wi< ^atf^Tsn^r r un tne orner nana, learneia supponea tne impugneajudgment c|i counsei Tor tne ytate/responaent the trial Court. ,hat>/ in oraer 10 appreciate tne for the accused/appeiiant, we ,,ha|>/i Ja.garnath. This witness has stated about 8.30 p.m. deceased BhunesM "let us go to tne nouse OT -farKeshvi,|ar OT larKesnwar yingn. • AS soon larKesnviar aingn, accuseci.'appe!iar(t attackea Bnunesnwar, as a rel accused.'appeiiant Chitrabhan ran a1 frightened raised cries, entered ttt imormea i arKesnwar, l^amesn\«/ar| examination ne nas statea mai 't-'s tne marnage OT nis sister uunitaj accusea unitraftnan ana aeceasea it is incorrect to say that he has flai; commission of murder of Bhuneshviter in the murder of ununesnwar. Notn! cross-examination OT tnis witness attacked the deceased and~ttiere w| to attack the deceased, in the crosb- tne deTence nas not Dseh aoie to el arBum.ent aavancea oy iearnea counsei 'e perusecs ine eviaence OT i^vv-& that in the night of 23r!! July 1997 at F-/ar smgn came 10 nis noyse anci saia ivhlar, therefore, they went to the house ^s they came out of ths house of Chitrabhan came with battieaxe and ;ult OT wnich ne Teii csowi and Iway from there. He (Jagarnath) being |e house of Tarkeshwar Singh and ana yuryapratap. in tne cross- tnonins pnor to tne aate ot inciaent in some quarrel took piace between Bhuneshwar Singh. He has stated that i]aisely impiicated the accused in the Singh lest he should &e impiicated jng nas oeen orougnt on recora in tne to snovrf that in Tact, tnis witness ..t^- oe neia inat Jagarnatn (h'vv-5) wa^ Chitrabhan a,rid caused his death. under Section 313 ofthe Cr.P.C. ha; ts any reason Tor tnis wstness wsss^s 6-examination OT other witnesses also licit any circumsiance t>y wnicn it can ine person v/no anacKea deceasecs pe accusea/appeiiant in nis statement staiedthat atthe time ofcommission P.T.O. ^SSsl i3.-1:lii@&;i:S?l JXI-HC-78 KlMi WqcTT ShT-n<b '3SI r^W^, ®Tflyi6,.fcll^y . ^.^:a:.2^^^,.^ 3ji<^iMa«i(l^39^f) ap^TqiTf^lN; (raT3IT^T»Hiqi STTCKgfNsn^T ofthe offence, he vras working wili deceased and thfe'wtness went t statea that Jagarnatn atiacKed tn$ nimseit in his statement under Set Jagarnath attackedthe decea'sed ^ the crime by Jagarnath., He has Munda District Shahdoi, on the d| l arkesnwar yingh ana he is not muraer of Bnuneshv/ar and ne has tne Basis OT suspicion oecause ne i^ substance in the argtiments ad^ accusea'appeiiant as tne eviaencq cogent ana does noi suner trom conTiaence OT the uoun. ihererot reiiance on the evidence ofthis 'witnl aw$re !n the result, the appeal D aismisseo ana is nereoy aismissea. 'SdT- L.C. Bhndoo Judge +ii|td'ifl-t (iTci?rfif feiA <,Riwi< ^isff^irgn^r )n ] arKesnwar sinan in wnose nouse ^nd even Tarkeshwar Singh has not deceased. Moraover, the accused tfen 313 Cr.P.C. has not stated that ^nd .he has been falseiy impiicated in ftated that he is a resident of viilage i^te of incideni: he was worKing witn ofthe fact as to wtio committed ihe peen Taisely implicatea in tne cnme on $ a outsider. Ihus, we do not flnd any janced by learned counsei for the of Jagarnath (PVV-5) is very ciear, |any inTirmity and the same inspires fe, tne tria! uourt nas ngntiy ptacec ess. aevoia OT ment is iiaDie to be Dhu'endra.i^isKra 'f ./ P.T.O.