HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.31903 of 2010 Date: February 7, 2011 Between: Shaik Masthan, S/o.late Madar Saheb, aged about 47 years, R/o. Door No. 1-40, Indira Nagar-I, Yenamalakuduru, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District … Petitioner And The Police Commissioner, Police Commissionerate, Vijayawada, Krishna District and others … Respondents Order: This writ petition is filed seeking mandamus declaring the action of respondents 4 to 6 in illegally trespassing into the house of the petitioner with the assistance of respondents 7 and 8 as illegal and arbitrary. In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it is stated that the mother of the petitioner expired on 19-09- 2010 and after her death, sisters of the petitioner, viz. respondents 4 to 6 herein, came to petitioner’s house for the purpose of attending her death ceremony and illegally encroached into the house of the petitioner with the assistance of respondents 7 and 8. It is the grievance of the petitioner that in spite of his lodging a complaint in this regard before the Inspector of Police, Penamaluru, no action is being taken. On obtaining instructions, it is submitted by learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents-Police that there is no indication of any cognizable contents in the complaint of the petitioner; as such he was advised to seek redressal before the competent civil court. Even according to the petitioner, respondents 4 to 6 herein are none other than his sisters and they came to his house to attend the death ceremony of their mother. At the same time, the petitioner also alleges trespass and encroachment into his house by respondents 4 to 6. If that be so, petitioner can as avail remedy available to him under Section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code by filing a private complaint before the competent criminal court. In view of availability of alternative remedy to the petitioner by way of filing a private complaint, no relief, as sought by the petitioner can be granted. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ (R. SUBHASH REDDY, J) February 7, 2011 MRR