IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26569 of 2008 JAI RAM TUDU Versus STATE OF BIHAR - - - - 3. 11.9.2008 Heard. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. of a case under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and is said to be apprehended on chase by the villagers. The defence is that, in fact, the petitioner was working as a labourer in a school which was being constructed and was not being paid his wages for which he was insisting upon and, as such, the informant in order to misappropriating the fund of the school as also not paying the wages to the petitioner has falsely implicated him. Reference was made to some of the paragraphs, like, paragraphs 3,5 and 6 and the petitioner’s defence gets support. Let the above named petitioner be directed to be released from custody on his furnishing a bond of Rs. 3,000/-( three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount 2 each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jahanjharpur, in Phulparas(Ghoghardia) P.S.Case No.14 of 2008. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)