IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44009 of 2007 SIDHNATH PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ----------- 05. 16.02.2010 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks to challenge the order of the learned trial court declining to discharge him of the accusations punishable under sections 420, 406, 504 and 34 IPC. The petitioner, who was then serving in the State Bank of India, was found instrumental in misappropriation of certain amounts. It appears from the impugned order that the learned trial court on perusal of the materials available on record, has recorded a finding that there is/are sufficient materials for framing of charge(s) against the petitioner. Considering the narrow confines of the provision incorporated under section 239 Cr.P.C. this Court is of the view that the present application deserves to be dismissed. It is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )