IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 822 OF 2005 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1278 OF 2004 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 78 OF 1994 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.156 OF 1994 Jean N. Duggan .. Appellant versus Dr.F.H. Duggan .. Respondent Mr.R.C. Tolat i.b L.C. Tolat & Co. for the appellant. Mr.J.S. Soloman i/b Soloman & Co. for the respondent. CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND D.G. KARNIK, JJ D.G. KARNIK, JJ D.G. KARNIK, JJ DATED : 18th November 2005. DATED : 18th November 2005. DATED : 18th November 2005. P.C.: Heard Mr.R.C. Tolat, the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. The impugned order does not suffer from any infirmity. The verification done by the Constituted Attorney for and on behalf of the petitioner pursuant to the order passed by the Appeal Court cannot be said to be suffered from any error. 3. No interference is called for. Appeal is dismissed in limine. R.M. LODHA, J D.G. KARNIK, J