IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 3RD JUNE 2008 / 13TH JYAISHTA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1727 of 2008(E) ------------------------------- CMP.1995/2005 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-I, KANNUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER: COMPLAINANT ---------------------------------------- P.SAVITHRI, W/O.BALAKRISHNAN AGED 56 YEARS, KANATHUR, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.K.SUMOD SRI.KAUSER EDAPPAGATH RESPONDENTS: ------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM BY ADV. SRI. P. RAVINDRA BABU, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR , J. ========================== Crl.R.P. No. 1727 of 2008 ========================== Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2008. ORDER The petitioner, who is the complainant in C.M.P. No. 1995 of 2005 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Kannur alleging an offence punishable under Section 420 IPC, challenges the order dated 09.06.2006 passed by the Magistrate dismissing the complaint under Section 203 Cr.P.C. The petitioner would allege that she was cheated by the accused who is none other than her husband's nephew while availing of a loan from a financial institution by inducing her to become a surety and that subsequently the accused failed to pay the amounts rendering the complainant liable for the loan amount. 2. The learned Magistrate has taken note of the fact that the revision petitioner is an employee of Kannur District Co- Operative Bank and that she is not an illiterate lady unaware of the consequences of signing loan documents. As rightly observed by the learned Magistrate, her remedy is to pay the loan amount due and recover the same from the defaulting accused. No CRL.R.P. NO. 1727/2008 : 2: intention to deceive can be spelt out from the allegations made in the complaint. I do not find any good ground to interfere with the order passed by the Magistrate. This Crl.R.P is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv CRL.R.P. NO. 1727/2008 : 3: