wgD . HIGH COURT OF cHHAmSGARH, BILAsPUR mam No. 525512007 PETITIONER Smt. Sushila Lakra W/o Shri Mitwa Bada, agad about 41 years, occupau'on, selvice, working as Assistant Teachsr, posted at Primary School, Kenapara Kmwa, Block Smajpur, Disin'ct Surguja(CG), resident of Satpata, Vishmmpur, Block and Tahsil Surajpur, Disuict Surgujam) Versus RESPONDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, ' through Secretmy Scheduled Caste, Tribe Welfam Department, Manualay DKS Bhawan, RaipudCG) , Dimector, Dixectorate of Scheduled Caste/Tn'be Welfam Chhatt‘xsgarh, Raipmcs) 3. The Collector, Surguja at Ambikapur, Distict Surguja(CG) Writ Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Apyeaxance: Shri Rakesh Anthony, counsel for the petitioner. ' Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. ORAL annex (12.09.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heaxd. The peu'n'oner, who is working on the post of Assistant Teacher, has been nansferred mm Primaly School, Kumwa Kenapam, Smajpur to Boys Primary School Kusmi on administtau‘ve grounds. Learned counsel for the petitioner algues that the husband of the petitioner is also in government service, therefore, if the order is given eh‘ect to, it shall create hardship to the petitioner. He also submits that in this regard, a representation has been nled by the petitioner vide Annexure P-4 before the concerned authority, but no decision has been taken on the said representation. Needless to say that these are not the grounds for interfering with the order of transfer by the Court of law. It is almost settled by ‘ the Apex Court that the transfer is an incidence of service and 2 W.P. (S) No.5255/2007 nobody, working on the transferable post, can daim to be posted at a particular place. It is for the employer to see that who should be posted Where in the interest of efticient fimctioning of the department. Unless the order of tmnsfer is vitiated by malafide or extraneous consideration or is against any statutory Rule or Act, it cannot be interfered by a Court of law, is the settled view of the Supreme Court. For the foregoing reasons, I am not inclined to entertain this petit'on on the above gounds. The petition is dismissed. However, the concerned authority shall be nee to dispose of the representau'on in accordance with law at the earliest. i i Sdl- 4 Sunil Kumar Sinha 1 Judge sunita