1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Misc. Civil Application No. 867/2010 in W. P. No. 4067/2010 (d) Rahul Ishwardas Gajbhiye ..vs.. State Bank of India, thr. its General Manager -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Vyas, Advocate for petitioner. CORAM:- S. A. BOBDE & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED:- SEPTEMBER 8, 2010 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant/ petitioner. 2. By the present application, the petitioner has prayer for review of the order dated 31st August, 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on earlier occasion, an incorrect submission was made on behalf of the petitioner that both the transfer orders have been passed by Regional Manager and, therefore, without authority of law. He further submits that the second order dated 31.07.2010 was also passed by the Regional Manager without obtaining 2 the approval from the Committee and, therefore, is without authority of law. He submits that the petitioner is willing to obey the first order dated 30.07.2010 as it was passed by the Committee but he may be relieved from the second order dated 31.07.2010. 3. We find that basically the petitioner has been transferred from one region to another by the Committee vide order dated 30.07.2010. Merely because the subsequent order, which makes minor change i.e. from Region-2 to Region-1, we are not inclined to declare the transfer order as without authority of law. In view of above, there is no merit in the application. The same is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE JUDGE kahale