1 unreported IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO.2578 OF 2010. Retail Kerosene Apang Union, through its Vice President Meer Manzoor Ali Meer Jafar Ali. ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents. ... Mr.C.V.Thombre, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.K.J.Ghute Patil, Asstt.Govt. Pleader for the State. ... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND : S.V.GANGAPURWALA,JJ. Date : 29.03.2010. ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S.V.Gangapurwala,J.) 1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel for the 2 parties, this petition is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission. 2. We have heard Mr.C.V.Thombre, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the Respondent. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that on 4.8.2007, it had made a representation to the Respondents regarding increase of kerosene quota to the Retail Kerosene Dealers but the said representation has not yet been decided. 4. We hereby direct the Respondents to decide the representation dated 4.8.2007 filed by the petitioner within a period of eight (8) weeks from today and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. 5. Rule made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs. (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) (P.V.HARDAS,J.) asp/office/wp258010 3