IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9395 of 2011 ANIL TELI SON OF RADHE SHYAM TELI. --------------- PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The name of the petitioner sprang up on the confession of the co-accused. A statement has been made in the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. The impugned order reflects that the investigation is still continuing. It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, 2 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimoor at Bhabua in connection with Mohaniya P.S. Case No. 131 /2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)