THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.10170 of 2009 ORDER: The Municipal Corporation of Anantapur, the 1s t respondent, proposed to widen the existing road, which passes in front of the building constructed by the petitioner, by name, Balaji Towers. It is stated that, since the widening was to result in demolition of the building, writ petitions were filed, and thereafter, the matter was placed before the Lok Adalat. The petitioner contends that an award was passed by the Lok Adalat, and his grievance is that the respondents are taking steps, contrary to the award. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings and learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent. The award passed by the Lok Adalat, at the instance of the petitioner and on the consent of the respondents, would certainly bind both the parties. The respondents categorically state that they have not at all deviated from the award, insofar as the building of the petitioner is concerned. Their grievance is that, on account of the interim order granted by this Court, the work, on the entire length of the road, which is proposed for widening; is stalled. During the pendency of the writ petition, the respondents are said to have marked the edges and boundaries of the road, in front of the building of the petitioner. He expressed his satisfaction with such a demarcation. Taking the same on record, the Writ Petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the respondents to widen the road, as proposed. The representation made on behalf of the respondents that they would not demolish the complex, constructed by the petitioner, is recorded, and it shall not be the concern of the petitioner, as regards the manner in which the road is to be laid at other places. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Dated:09.11.2009 GJ