2 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7628/2008. MAM CHAND VS. APPOINTING AUTHORITY DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHURU DATE OF ORDER : 03.11.2008. HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J. Mr. J.S. Bhati for the petitioner. In pursuant to a notification dated 03.04.2008, a list of successful candidates in order of merit relating to appointment to the post of Class IV employees in district Judgeship Churu was declared on 17.04.2008. In the list aforesaid, the petitioner stood at S.No.5. The District Judge, Churu by the order dated 22.04.2008 modified the list of successful candidates dated 17.04.2008 while keeping only one person in waiting list as the rule concern prescribes for that only. The grievance of the petitioner is that the District Judge erroneously modified the select list. It is also contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the District Judge, Churu by an another notification dated 08.09.2008 initiated process of selection against five existing vacancies and that is illegal as all existing vacancies should have been filled in by process of selection initiated under the notification dated 03.04.2008. 2 It is not in dispute that the process of selection initiated under the notification dated 03.04.2008 resulted into declaration of select list dated 17.04.2008, wherein name of the petitioner was at S.No.5. The process of selection concern was only against three vacancies and as such one person was kept for waiting list under the order dated 17.04.2008. I do not find any error in that as against three vacancies only one person could have been placed in waiting list. So far as the subsequent process of selection initiated under notification dated 08.09.2008 is concerned, that is relating to vacancies occurred subsequent to vacancies notified under notification dated 03.04.2008. The vacancies subsequently occurred are always required to be filled in by subsequent process of selection, if the Rules do not provide otherwise. In view of it, the initiation of fresh process of selection is also in accordance with law. For the reasons stated above, this petition for writ is having no merit, hence dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Anil/