IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 21ST NOVEMBER 2011 / 30TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 30974 of 2011(V) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- N. RAMACHANDRAN, GAYATHRI, III, 740 B, PARAKKAL TEMPLE CROSS ROAD, CHEMBUMUKKU, VAZHAKKALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 021. BY ADV. SRI.K.R.VINOD. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, KOCHI - 682 030. 2. SECRETARY, THRIKKAKARA MUNICIPALITY, CIVIL STATION ROAD, THRIKKAKARA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 021. 3. DISTRICT OFFICER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, GANDHI NAGAR, KOCHI -682 020. 4. REVENUE DIVISION OFFICER, FORT KOCHI, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 021. 5. M/S. MATHER PROJECTS AND CONSTRUCTIONS LTD., RAJAJI ROAD, KOCHI - 682 035. R1 & R4 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE, R2 BY SRI. SHANAVAS KHAN, S.C, R3 BY SRI. M.K.C. DAS, S.C, THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/11/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).NO.30974/2011-V: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXHIBIT-P1- SERIES OF PHOTOGRAPHS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. EXHIBIT-P2- TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINTS SUBMITTED TO THE CONCERNED AUTHORITIES. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 30974 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner claims to be a resident of an area where the 5th respondent is constructing an apartment complex. 2. In this writ petition the prayer sought for by the petitioner is to direct the respondent to stop the allegedly illegal construction activities of the 5th respondent. This prayer is sought on the basis that a lot of inconveniences are caused due to the construction and that damages have already been caused to the neighbouring properties. 3. However the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent points out that the construction work is almost complete and that what is now going on is the painting work of the building. Be that as it may, having regard to the nature of the complaint and in view of the fact that the petitioner has forwarded a copy of Ext.P2 complaint to the 2nd respondent, I direct that if the W.P.(C) No. 30974 OF 2011 :2 : 2nd respondent has received such a complaint, necessary action will be taken by him without any further delay in the matter. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/-