IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.49746-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 10, 2006 Nooru ...PETITIONER VERSUS State of Haryana ....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr.Ashok Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Partap Singh, Sr.DAG, Haryana. ... Petitioner Nooru has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.87 dated 17.3.2006 registered under Sections 399/402 IPC and Sections 25/54/59 of the Arms Act at Police Station Hodal, District Faridabad. I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR as well as the order dated 1.5.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad. Counsel for the petitioner contends that co-accused of the petitioner, namely, Munshi and Aameen, have been granted regular bail by this Court. Counsel for the respondent-State has pointed out that against the petitioner, two more FIRs have been registered, out of which, in one he has been convicted. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to press this petition. Crl.Misc.No.49746-M of 2006 -2- Dismissed as not pressed. However, counsel for the respondent-State submits that the prosecution will conclude its evidence within three months. In view of this, the trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of 4 months. In case the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, it will be open for the petitioner to apply afresh for regular bail before the trial Court and the same will be considered in accordance with law. October 10, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE