IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 137 OF 2009 VPK URBAN CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED THROUGH LEGAL OFFICER RATNA S. AMONKAR ... Applicant Versus SHRI. SHAIKH RUCNODDIN MOHAMMED AND ANR., ... Respondents Shri D. Pangam, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri R. De Noronha, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 2nd September, 2009 P.C. Heard Learned Counsels on behalf of the parties. We could proceed on the assumption that the filing of special leave to appeal was delayed by 11 days although by order dated 6.8.09 the applicant/complainant was required to state specifically the number of days by which the application was delayed. The ground mentioned for condonation of delay is that the advocate of the applicant calculated limitation from the date of the application for certified copy i.e. 10.12.08 and not from the date of the order i.e.24.11.08. If the applicant's advocate has made a mistake it does not mean that either of the parties should suffer. Respondent can be adequately compensated. Considering the cause shown, delay is condoned subject to the payment of costs of Rs.3,000/- to the respondent. N. A. BRITTO, J. oc