... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.493 OF 2003 APPEAL NO.493 OF 2003 APPEAL NO.493 OF 2003 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri A.S.Shitole, A.P.P for the Appellant. Shri Ajay A. Joshi for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. : A. S. OKA, J. DATE DATE DATE : OCTOBER 20, 2006. : OCTOBER 20, 2006. : OCTOBER 20, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned A.P.P on the prayer for grant of leave. The Respondents have been acquitted for offences punishable under section 498-A, 384, 323, 504, 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. I have perused the impugned Judgment and Order. The learned Trial Judge has passed order of acquittal after appreciating oral and documentary evidence on record. The view taken by the learned Trial Judge is that none of the offences are established. An Affidavit of the third Respondent has been placed on record which shows that there has been subsequent settlement between the third Respondent and the complainant. In ... 2 ... fact, it is stated that now the third Respondent and the complainant are staying under one roof. 2. Apart from the aforesaid statement, it is obvious that the view taken by the learned Trial Judge is a possible view which could have been taken on the basis of evidence on record. No case is made out for grant of Leave. Appeal is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE