iWS"6tA'°-'"? ^W2\ Srs 5 INTHE HIGHCOUKTOPJKDICATUREOPCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fSJNO. lf46( /2QO& PETITIONER RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. r^ ^f w Kumari Gayatri Chouhan D/6 Late LaKhan Lal ChouUaii, Aged abDut 21 years, R/o Ward No. 14, Pailpara, Sarangarh, Tatosil Sarangarh E>istrietRaigarh(C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh^ Through : Secfetary 'Reyenue B^iartment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Gollector,J?aigarh E»strictRaigarfc{e.Gr.) f' '; , ~ .: • ; 3. The^aK^c^^aisngiSc^ Distnet RaigarK (C.G.) 4. ^hief Executive OfficeE, Janpad JL'- Ftenchayat, Sarangartt Distnct Raigarh (C.G.) At. WRIT I^n'EIG^X^D^ AI^EI^ 226^^^^^^£^^ THE CONST3TUTIG ^INDIA FC>RaSSU&^ NATU^^Og ^^NBAia^ <^^ O'mEKWRTFOFEIKEN^'E'URE^FG.^ ^ Tl petttibn^ otost humNI^;aad^ submitasuridei-: : . ^^^1^^^^ -W. -..W-A^ll-1 XI-HG—78 ~¥ ^ W*KtT9>W^» 's^ '^wf<i, &v\»'i<c, fadiyy . w-P-^>7^-^// "^, 200^ an^T 'q^T (ljc|f^«l<tT) aii^r w K-u* WT OT^T sli^liti TOITWBf^T 311^1 <^i<i[?i<fl'T Wf^i? "^f f^%1f <f3i<^i< i?3ffiltT3II^T SB : HOK'BLE MR. JUSTICE 17.09.2010 Shri Ajay Kuinar Bareik Smt. Smita Ghai, P.L. £ ShriN.K.Chatterji, courjsel counsel for fhe petitioner. r fh.e Stete/resps, 1 to 3. fer resp. No.4. Grievaace of fhe petitio( her father late Lakhaii Lal Ch<| Paxichavat SaTaaKarh aad wa^ has been subiuitted fhat 27.12.2006 in hamess. Furtht she inade an. application fo| 19.5.2009 (Annexure R-4/1) fhe same has been rejected 04 Counsel for fhe would t>e served if fhe petiticji petiti.GD. with liberty to make| N0.1 aad in tura fhe respouj fhe ca.se ofttie petitiouer syiu.'j otier in tlie present petition is that j>uhau was an einployee ofjanpad workuiK: as Assistaiit Grade III. It ftther of the oeti.tioaer died on ;r the case ofthe petiuoner is that conipassionate appointment 011 Ibefore the CoUector, Raigarh but 17.7.09 vide Amiexure A/2, petttiotier subinits fhat ends of justice d^ier is permitted to withdraw fbis representation before respondent ttlent N0.1 be directed to consider t>afhetically. Counsel for tlie State has ah-eadY been consideredl was rejected and fherefor^ whatsoever to seek coimpassxjnate ubmits fhat ca.se of tjb.e petilioner by ttie coiapetent authority aad the petitioner has ao right' appoiatment. the petitioner wants to withdraw Be that as it mav. as tfais petition with lifaerty respondent N0.1 ghe is pem4tted te dq^ so.: In the evenniaUU' of to lo-ake representation .before XI-HC—78 an^r wi W 'HsiT STT^T ^^ii<t) .^ 41 s ^^"4l<<l<rt<<, 8>ti1y'i<o, fs|diy^< WHWI g»*<l<»» 200 f 3n^T'tf^T (lj°ifj<si<^i) TOnw^iftgan^i —'2-- :ntatit>n filuig any such represei aufhoritv inav consider and df law. Accordingly, the petitioi^er is permitted to wifhdraw fhis petition wifh fhe aforesaid libef-ty. It is inade clear thaf opinion on inerits of fhe ca would, if so desire, niay decidt wifh law. <M<i[<n<fli •H i<nil* ^f fs^ ^t^x ^Taffinan^ii [?n by the petitioner, fhe said cide the saine in accordaace wifh fi|us Court has not expressed aay se an.d the authority coacemed the representanon ia accoi-dance :.Sd/-l..::. '. PritihkerDhvakar .'.'Judge.' ——'':•:'.