IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR MONDAY, THE 22ND NOVEMBER 2010 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 34225 of 2010(C) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- D.KORAH, VATTAKKATTU HOUSE, COMMITTEE MEMBER, KOTHAMANGALAM MARKETING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.E 137, KOTHAMANGALAM. BY ADVS. SRI.P.P.JACOB, SRI.T.P.GOPAKUMAR. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KERALA, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1. 2. THE CIRCLE CO-OPERATIVE UNION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KOTHAMANGALAM/ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (G), KOTHAMANGALAM-686 691. 3. THE RETURNING OFFICER, CIRCLE CO-OPERATIVE UNION, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, AUDIT, KOTHAMANGALAM, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, KOTHAMANGALAM-686 691. 4. K.M.IBRAHIM, KOTTAYIL HOUSE, COMMITTEE MEMBER, KOTHAMANGALAM MATSYA VYAPARA MARKEING THOZHILALI CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.E.1154, KOTHAMANGALAM-686 691. ....2.. :-2-: W.P.(C). NO.34225/2010-C: 5. THE KOTHAMANGALAM MATSYA VYAPARA MERKETING THOZHILALI CO-OPERATIVE SOIETY LTD.NO.E.1154, KOTHAMANGALAM-686 691, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BASANT BALAJI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/11/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P(C)No.34225 of 2010 ---------------------------------------- Dated 22nd November, 2010 JUDGMENT In the light of Ext.P1 judgment this writ petition is not maintainable. In fact, the prayer of the petitioner for directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders in Election Petition.No.15 of 2010 was already considered by this Court in W.P.(C)No.14517 of 2010 and as per Ext.P1 judgment this Court directed the additional 6th respondent therein to consider the aforesaid election petition and to dispose of the same expeditiously. This writ petition filed by the same petitioner on the same subject matter and also seeking the same reliefs is certainly barred by res judicata. Hence this writ petition is dismissed. C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS