1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2331/2009 (Sanjay Patmase vs. State of Maharashtra ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. ............................................................................................................................ CORAM: A.P. BHANGALE,J. DATED: 29 th July, 2009. 1. Advocate for the applicant is absent. 2. Heard Mr Anup Parihar, learned APP for the Respondent-State, who opposed the Bail Application vociferously, on the ground that the accusations against the applicant are serious and grave, inasmuch as it alleged that the applicant dragged forcibly in the Maruti car and carried the deceased. Later on, the dead body of the deceased was found within the local limits of Kuhi Police Station. There are eye witnesses to the incident indicating that applicant-Sanjay Patmase had forcibly dragged the deceased in his Maruti car on a day prior the dead body was found. The Maruti car was also seized on the basis of memorandum statement recorded u/s 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, which was having bloodstains. Clothes; iron rod were discovered at the instance of the present applicant; while blood stained clothes and one Farsa (weapon) were seized at the instance of co-accused Rafique. The cause of death in the PM notes indicated that the death was as a result of injuries to vital organ of deceased. Thus, considering the seriousness of accusations and material collected during investigation, indicating involvement of the present applicant, prima facie, in a case of kidnapping and murder ; as also the past criminal history reported against the applicant, no case is made out for grant of bail pending the trial. 3. In the result, Application is rejected. JUDGE sahare