l^- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR lVI.A.(Cl.No.66of2006 Singie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. Appellant CSaJmant Respondents Non-applicants Saiyyad Riyaz, S/o Saiyyad Imamul Haq, Aged about 18 yrs., R/o Abhanpur Basti, P.S. Abhanpur, Distt. raipur Versus 1. Farid, R/o M.S.Service Station Telibandha, Raipur, Rah. & Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Mohammad Hadis S/o Husaini Saudagar, R/o M.S.Service Station, Telibandha, Raipur, Tah. & Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. The New india Insurance Co. Ltd. Branch Manager, Branch Raniganj, By Divtsionai Manager, Divisiona! OfRce, Kachahars Chowk. Jail Road, Raipur (C.G.) Miscellaneous Appeal Under Section 1 73 of the Mlotor Vehides Act.1994 Present: Shri S.C.Verma, counsel forthe appellant. Shri Sudhir Agrawa!, counsel for respondent No.S/lnsurance-Company. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 10.8.2007) Heard. 2. Being aggrieved by the award dated 13.12.2005 passed in Claims Case No.44 of 2005 by 1Q Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Raipur (henceforth, 'the M.A.C.T.) whereby a sum of Rs.39,482/- has been awarded towards compensation, the appellanVclaimant has preferred this appeal for enhancement- 3. During the course of arguments, a settlement was arrived at amicably between the appellant and the insurance-company whereunder the iearned counsel for the respondent/insurer agreed to pay an additionai sum of Rs.10,CX)0/- over and above the amount awarded by the M.A.C.T. within one from today. This was agreed by the learned counsel for the appeliant. 4. In view of the amicabie settlement arrived at between the appellant and the insurance-Company, the award passed by the M.A.C.T. is modified and compensation awarded by the tearned M.A.C.T., Raipur in claim case No. 44 of 2005 is enhanced to Rs.49,482 /-. After adjusting the amount already deposited, the remaining compensation shall be deposited by the insurance-Comipany in the M.A.C.T. within one month from today, lailing which, the respondent/insurance-company shal! also be liable to pay interest @ 9% per annum from the date of application ttll realisation. 5. A copy of this order be sent to the M.A.C.T. forthwith. The M.A.C.T. shall on deposit of compensation ensure: A. that the claimanVappellant is noticed to appear before the M.A.C.T., in person along with his pass book of an account in a nationalized bank, B. that the pass books of the daimant is accompanied with the photograph duiy verified by the bank and before issuance of cheque by the M.A.C.T., the name of holder and photograph are also verified. C. that a direction is issued to the concerned bank not to release the amount in favour of any person, other than the daimant untess ordered bythe M.A.C.T. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the appeal stands disposed of. Sd/- DaipRaosahebDesbmukh Judge