// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT PRINCIPAL SEAT, JODHPUR ORDER In S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.3295/2009 {Kishnaram Versus State of Rajasthan} Date of Order ::: 13th July, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Shri Mahaveer Bishnoi, counsel for the petitioner Shri A.R. Nikub, PP for the State of Rajasthan #### By the Court: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. It is contended that Devendra Kumar, husband of complainant Santosh Kanwar, has already been arrested and released on bail. The petitioner is father-in-law of complainant, against whom there is no allegation of beating in the F.I.R. Taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, I allow this bail // 2 // application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Therefore, the S.H.O./I.O. of the Mahila Police Station, Jodhpur is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Kishnaram S/o Shri Birdra Ram in FIR No. 117/2009 registered under Section(s) 498A, 406 and 323 IPC, he shall enlarge him on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with one surety of the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii)He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any Police officer; (iii)He shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. //DK//