..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.605 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.439 OF 1991 Smt.Alka Ravindra Gaikwad. ..Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. .... Ms.Sharmila Kaushik, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.Rajesh More, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 27th June, 2008. DATED : 27th June, 2008. DATED : 27th June, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard both sides. 2. The applicant - Smt.Alka Ravindra Gaikwad who is the wife of orig.appellant No.3 Shri.Ravindra alias Raju Parashuram alias Prasadrao Gaikwad (in Criminal Appeal No.439 of 1991) has preferred the present application. It is stated that Shri.Ravindra @ Raju Parashuram @ Prasadrao Gaikwad, who is appellant No.3 in Criminal Appeal No.439 of 1991, has expired on 17th September, 2003. Hence it is prayed that the appeal be treated as abated as far as her husband i.e. orig.appellant No.3 is concerned. ..(2).. 3. Looking to this fact, the appeal be treated as abated as far as appellant No.3 is concerned. 4. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)