1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 5809/2006 Mohd. Ashrafkhan Pathan ..vs.. Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Chandrapur and another. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Sirpurkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Thakare, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2. CORAM: D. K. DESHMUKH AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ. DATED : 21 st NOVEMBER, 2008 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. It is an admitted position that father of the petitioner was in Government service. He was a Class-IV employee. He has completed his service and on attaining the age of superannuation he retired. 3. We have seen the record. We find no justification for giving appointment to ward of an employee, who is regularly retired from service. Ultimately, the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal is a just order, calls for no interference at the hands of this Court. The petition is, therefore, rejected. However, at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, operation of the interim order is continued for a period of four weeks from today. JUDGE JUDGE kahale