IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP. No. 23264 of 2010 Date of Decision: 24.12.2010. Mahender Singh, A.E. --Petitioner Versus M.D., U.H.B.V.N Ltd. and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. M.L. Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Notice of motion. Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate present in the Court on behalf of Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate been asked to accept notice on behalf of respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is being disposed of at the motion stage itself. The petitioner retired as A.E from the respondent-Nigam on 31.3.2005. It is alleged that on the basis of certain allegations of some shortage/breakage of the transformers the retiral benefits of the petitioner have been withheld. It is further stated that no departmental inquiry or any proceedings were initiated against the petitioner during the period he remained in service. The petitioner was even promoted as A.E. Petitioner has made a representation (Annexure P-5) in respect to his grievance but no decision has been taken thereon till date. CWP. No. 23264 of 2010 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if, respondents are directed to take decision on the representation of the petitioner, referred to above. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.3 to take decision on the representation of the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date certified copy of this order is served upon the said respondent. Needless to say that in the event the claim of the petitioner is to be rejected, the same shall be by a reasoned and speaking order. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 24.12.2010. lucky