10.wp.5030,5029&5094.06 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION [1] WRIT PETITION NO.5030 OF 2006 Rupali Yashwant Thakur. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. ..Respondents. WITH [2] WRIT PETITION NO.5029 OF 2006 Sangita Bhikaji Masage. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. ..Respondents. WITH [3] WRIT PETITION NO.5094 OF 2008 Santosh Baburao Maske. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. ..Respondents. .... Mr.R.K. Mendadkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.V.A. Gangal, Advocate with Mr.S.S. Deshmukh and Ashok Gade, Advocates for the respondent. .... CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH, AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATED : 30TH NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C.:­ 10.wp.5030,5029&5094.06 2 1. Heard learned Counsel for both the sides. Perused the judgment of the Full Bench in the case of Shilpa Vishnu Thakur vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. reported in 2009(3) Mh.L.J. 995. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners states that the facts and law involved in the present Petitions are similar to the facts and law involved in Writ Petition No. 5028 of 2006. Statement is accepted. In view of this statement, for the reasons given in our order dated 30th November, 2009 passed in Writ Petition No.5028 of 2006, the present Writ Petitions are also rejected. 3. At the request of the learned Counsel for the petitioners, the operation of the interim order is extended for a period of eight weeks. (D.K.DESHMUKH,J) (K.K. TATED,J)