SBCWP NO.9817/05. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9817/2005. Rajasthan Gramin Bank Versus Central Govt.Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court & Anr. Date of Order:- May 12, 2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Ajay Gupta for the petitioner. Shri P.K. Sharma for the respondents. ****** BY THE COURT:- The order which is impunged in the present case is dated 7/10/2005 by which, application of the petitioner seeking permission to lead evidence was rejected because such a plea was not set up by the petitioner-Management in the reply/written statement to the statement of claim originally filed. The controversy is squarely covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in Karnataka State Road Transport Corpn. Vs. Smt.Lakshmidevamma and another : AIR 2001 SC 2090 on which, learned counsel for petitioner has placed reliance. In that judgment, it was held by the Supreme Court that right of employer to adduce addtional evidence in justifiction of action taken has to be reserved in application made by employer under Section 33 or in SBCWP NO.9817/05. 2 objection filed to reference made under Section 10. Right cannot be exercised at any time thereafter. In view of above, I do not find any infirmity in the impugned-order. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil/-