IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18722 of 2010 SATYA NARAYAN SINGH S/O LATE RAM KHELAWAN SINGH R/O VILL.- BIRPUR, P.O.- BIRPUR, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI (BIHAR), WORKING AS ASSISTANT TEACHER, GOVERNMENT MIDDLE SCHOOL, BIRPUR, BLOCK- BIRPUR, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI (BIHAR) Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA (BIHAR) 3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA (BIHAR) 4. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY FINANCE (PAY FIXATION) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA (BIHAR) 5. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA (BIHAR) 6. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BEGUSARAI 7. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER-CUM- CHAIRMAN THE DISTRICT EDUCATION ESTABLISHMENT COMMITTEE, BEGUSARAI 8. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, MUNGER 9. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, BEGUSARAI 10. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, BEGUSARAI 11. THE DISTRICT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, BEGUSARAI 12. THE HEADMASTER-CUM-DRAWING & DISBURSING OFFICER OF GOVERNMENT MIDDLE SCHOOL, BIRPUR ANCHAL- BIRPUR, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra,Advocate For the State: Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate. ---------- 2. 21.6.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks a direction upon the respondents to treat his appointment as on regular basis 2 with effect from 8.5.1976 instead of 1.4.1977 in the Matric Trained pay scale. It is submitted that the petitioner was originally appointed on stipend basis for the period 8.5.1976 to 31.3.1977 and for the said reason he has not been granted the benefit of regular appointment from the earlier date. In support of his stand learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon a decision of this Court dated 1.5.1995 in CWJC No. 3633 of 1994 (Yogendar Raut Vrs. State of Bihar & ors.). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the authorities may be directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order in terms of the decisions of this Court in the said case and similar other matters subsequently disposed of. It is further submitted that the representation of the petitioner has been lying with the District Superintendent of Education for the last many years but no action has been taken. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall file a fresh representation before the 3 respondent District Superintendent of Education, Begusarai/competent authority stating all the facts and annexing the aforesaid order dated 1.5.1995 of this Court and other similar orders on which he relies along with a copy of this order and the DSE/competent authority shall consider and dispose of the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order by passing a reasoned order. S.Pandey ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.)