IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** Criminal Misc. No.34836-M of 2006 Date of Decision:04.02.2008 Ashok Kumar and another .....Petitioners Vs. Didar Singh .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- None for the petitioners. Ms. Gurvir Kaur, Advocate for the respondent. **** RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the respondent fairly admits that the dispute between the parties has been compromised and the amount due from the petitioner shall be paid to her as agreed. As the dispute has already been settled, she does not have any objection to the quashing of the complaint filed by her under Section 138 read with Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Once the differences between the parties have amicably been settled and even the amount in question has been agreed to be paid, no useful purpose will be served by proceeding with the prosecution. Accordingly, the complaint and all proceedings subsequent thereto are quashed. However, with a liberty to the respondent to get the same revived in case the amount as agreed by the petitioner is not paid. The petition is disposed of. February 04, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) renu JUDGE