IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2976 of 2011 Ajay Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Union of India & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: None for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has filed this writ petition to challenge the action of the respondents in denying him enrolment in the Indo- Tebetan Border. After having filed the petition, no one has put in appearance on 17.2.2011, 28.4.2011 and 12.5.2011. The counsel appeared only on 17.3.2011 to seek adjournment. The reason for declining appointment as disclosed from the pleadings is that the earlier appointment/enrolment of the petitioner was set-aside because of his involvement in a criminal case. The petitioner had withheld this information while seeking the present enrolment. On coming to know about the same, the impugned order has been passed. The criminal case is still pending against the petitioner. In this background, no case for interference in the writ petition is made out. Dismissed. July 11, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE