:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1066 OF 2005 Hemant Tulshiram Suryavanshi ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr.V.M. Thorat, for the Applicant. Mr.A.S. Konde Deshmukh, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 23rd February 2005 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the parties. Learned A.P.P. fairly accepts that insofar as the present Applicant is concerned, investigation is complete, but charge sheet has not been filed as two co-accused are absconding. He submits that if at all this Court is inclined to release the Applicant on bail, strict conditions be imposed :2: requiring the Applicant to report to the investgiating officer alternate day till the filing of the charge sheet as the co-accused are still absconding. I find substance in this submission. Accordingly, the Applicant is enlarged on bail on the following conditions. (A) The Applicant is granted bail in connection with CR.No.14/2005 registered with Gamdevi Police Station, Solapur, on his executing personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with two local sureties in the like amount. (B) The Applicant shall report to the investigating officer on the alternate day between 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. till the filing of the charge sheet. (C) The Applicant shall not tamper the prosecution evidence nor shall influence the prosecution witnesses in any manner whatsoever. :3: (D) The Applicant shall co-operate with the trial Court for early disposal of the trial. If the trial Court is of the opinion that the Applicant are in any manner responsible for the delay in disposal of the trial, that fact be recorded in the roznama, which can be a ground for cancellation of bail. (E) The Applicant shall not go out of Bombay city till the filing of the charge sheet without giving prior intimation to the investigating officer in that behalf. . Application disposed of on the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)