IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 24TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 28811 of 2011(B) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. UNNIMAYA S.R., D/O.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, AGED 22, VAZHATHOPPLE VEEDU, VALIYAPADAM, VILANTHARA P.O., SASTHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM-690 521. 2. ARATHY R.PILLAI, D/O.VENUGOPALA PILLAI, AGED 22, AKHILALAYAM, KALLELIBHAGOM P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM-690 519. BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM, SC, KERALA UTY., SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, KERALA UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs WP(C).No. 28811 of 2011(B) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16/09/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 28811 of 2011 B ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 24th day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petitioners were M.Sc Zoology students of N.S.S. College, Pandalam, affiliated to the first respondent University. Their grievance is regarding the valuation of their third paper of the 3rd semester, viz., Immunology and Developmental Biology. According to the petitioner, the valuation was improper and, therefore, they failed in the examination. Complaining of the above, they approached the Vice Chancellor by filing Ext.P1 representation. However, no response was received and hence, the writ petition was filed. 2. I heard Standing Counsel appearing for the University also. 3. Admittedly, there is no Regulation framed by the University, enabling the petitioner to claim revaluation of the answer papers. However, in the nature of the grievance that W.P.(C) No.28811/2011 : 2 : is highlighted, I direct that it will be open to the petitioners to make a representation to the Controller of Examinations of the first respondent University, in which event, he will look into the matter and if he is satisfied that the petitioners have a case, appropriate action will be taken. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks/24/11 // True Copy // P.A. To Judge