1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4724/1999 Municipal Council, Tirora ..versus.. Bhandara Zilla Nagar Parishad and others =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-== Shri I.N.Choudhari, counsel for Respondent No.1. C ORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 20th JULY, 2010. Learned counsel for petitioner Municipal Council called absent while counsel for respondent no.1 present. 2) Matter relates to back-wages pursuant to order dated 3rd April, 1990. Thereafter on 7.12.1999, the learned Member, Industrial Court, Nagpur, directed payment of backwages which was around Rs. 15,00,000/- by issuing requisite certificate. The petitioner feels that the order is illegal. 3) It is informed by the learned counsel for respondent no.1, since there was no stay initially, an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- is deposited by the petitioner in this Court, which was withdrawn by the respondents and distributed to the respective employees. 2 4) Since the earlier order dated 3rd April, 1990 , has reached finality, as the Municipal Council lost in the writ petition and also in the L.P.A. being L.P.A. Stamp No. 29318/92 was withdrawn. It was thereafter, the certification of back-wages was sought. 5) Considering above aspects, since the recovery certificate is already issued in favour of respondent no.1 – Union in terms of Section 50 of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971, the liability of the Municipal Council subsists and consequently the order does not call for any interference. 6) The writ petition dismissed. No costs. (K.U.Chandiwal) JUDGE. Rvjalit