CD @ gcb C‘ rvl x IN T HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(C TTISGARH)“’ WRIT PETITION max—L53 OF 2003 PETITIONER > UwPosoBhadorla,son of B.Baoriya aged abo ut SO yearsy/‘Ass istant rwsnb. Inspector of Police , Felice station—Pithora, ' Dis tr ict-Mahas amund ,(C.G;) VERSUS — _-—__ .o 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Home\a&Pollce, A£falrs, at secretrlat,B‘K s Bhawan, Manralay Ralpur,DJ.strict—Ralpur, ‘ ( Chhattlsgarh) o RESPONDENTS (x Director General of Police, (CoGa) Police Head Quarter,Ralpur. ' Dlstrlct—Ralpur,(c Ga) Superintendent of. Police, ( Mahas amund DIS trlct—Mahas amund , C G ) RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 225/227 OF THE W ,CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. m " 3 hd E ‘ i 5’7—2003 L t Shrl Malay Kumar Bhadur learned counsel for The péfifibner § ' Miss Sharmlla Smghal Learned Dy Gov? Advocate for The, i ~ V spondem‘s '1 The pe‘h‘honer by This mri‘r pe‘rifion séeks To challenge the Impugned order- Annexure P dafgd 30—5-2003; by. which The Director General of Police Transfer-red ‘l'l’he l'pe'rij’ioher from : ; Dxs'l'rlcf Mahasamund To DIsTn T Rainmagaon ThergrieVance of The l peTmoner is ThaT The peTmone was posTed aT Basna from where her 4 was Transferred To Bagbahra VI e order doTed 1 11 2002 Thereaffer ’ Vlde order daTed 3 2 2003 h was Transferred from Bagbahro To 3/ ‘l ' lollce Force RaJnandgoon Vlde The Impugned order Therefore This 3‘ a J1:- P 'l l l i PIThora and now he has been ransferred from PlThora To DisTrIcT g l l l l order be sToyed I have heard learned cou_ sel for The parTles I ' l ,. _ V“ V Learned counsel for peTmoner has been Transferre wIThna very shorT span of Time and ' 1112002 3, ; i> a I: g ” V’ On The oTher hand learne Dy GovT AdvocaTe$ argued Thaf The f L l l earlier Transfers and posTmgs o l The peTI-Tloner were wlThm The same dIsTrlcT and now The peTlTIoner as been Transferred by The DIrecTor peTITloner subrmTTed ThaT The e presenT Is The Third Transfer s : e/ / h} XI~HCv22 mamawwm €531f=anm ‘ General of Police in ofher' dis'rr'icf and The pe‘l’ifioner was in The 1999 and fhereby he has already rs in a district " fhus a he pe‘ri'rioner to remain in one district Therefore, There is no merit in In view of ‘I’he submissions made by. Iear-ned counsei for The respondenfs, Iearned counsei f fhe pe'ri‘lioner was posfed in Raipur Disfricf from 1989 To 1998 md since fhe year 1998 Till dafe fhe pe'l’i‘rioner remained posl'ed i Than 4% years which is sufficienT Time fhereby he has complefed more for any public servanT To remain aT one place and now he has been Transferred To Rajnandgaon Dis :ounsel for The parTies and having 1sTances of The case, I do noT find any mala fide or bias in Transferring The beTiTioner from one disTricT To anoTher disTricT ThaT Too offer Mahasamund Disfricf since' completed more fhan 4% yea sufficienf fime was cl!owed +0 ' fhe pefi‘rion. or The pefifioner very fairly admi‘H’ed by fiiing an applica‘l’ion Thai a ‘lhe Disfric'r of Mahasamund and' l Having heard learned < considered The facTs and circur TricT. i compleTing 4% years. Moreover, The peTiTioner has noT been able To subsTanTiaTe his sTaTemenT ThaT The impugned order is arbiTrary an: illegal as also he has noT been able To explain how iT is arbiTrary. £ J‘7~Uf€ea [new y. XI-HC-22 Mwq m 200 _g/ mam-4m f3ém amfmm In view of ‘rhe above, liable L‘ro be: which is M.(W).P.No.1748/2003 and Ii disposed of. I do nof find any force in This pe'rifion and is rejecfed. Consequen‘rly A.Nos. 5764/2003 & 5895/2003 sfands Sdl- L.C.BHADOO Judge [‘iiéw W