IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 1309 of 2000 Between: Smt.Amina Begum, W/o. Late Md.Abdul Azia, R/o. 2-3-71, Sangareddy, Medak District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Collector and the District Magistrate, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Anjaiah Bhawan, RTC 'X' Roads, Hyderabad. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajendranagar Mandal, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Ayub Khan, S/o. Ikramuddin Khan, H.No.2-1-4, Post and Village: Gaganpahad, Tq: Rajandranagar, Ranga Reddy District. (W.P. is dismissed against R4 as per C.O. dt.21-4-2009) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a direction, writ or order, one in the nature of Mandamus:- a) declaring the action of the Respondents in not recovering the compensation amount as ordered in W.C.No.24/85 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Ranga Reddy District zone as depriving the compensation amount will leave to deprive the right to live, inspite of lapse of 10 years, as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 21 and 300(A) of the Constitution of India; b) directing the Respondents to recover the compensation amount awarded in the above case forth-with; c) granting all consequential benefits; d) awarding costs; or any other orders appropriate in the case may be passed. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.V.PRAVEEN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY Writ Petition No.1309 of 2000 ORDER: This Writ Petition is listed for hearing on 03-06-2009 and on that day as there was no representation, it is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’ today. Even today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. ___________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J. 04th June, 2009. skmr