IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.14457-M of 2010 Date of Decision:14.3.2011 Surinder Kumar Dhiman and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. R.K. Trikha, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Munish Behl, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present petition may be dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 14.3.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE