(1%? HEGH COURT OF CHHA'E’TISGARH AT §EL&SPUR E§W$BON BENCH CQRNVI: HON’LE $HRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. & HGN‘BLE $HRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. MA. Na. 4&4 0f 2§02 ‘Appeiiam 1) Dhruw Kumar S/o. Thanoo Ram iAppiicaMs Sahu aged 52 yers. 2), Pyaribai Wlo. Dhruw Kumar, aged 47' years. 3) Shiv Ram, Wd/o. Lt. Uttam Kumar, aged 27 years. 4) Miss. Janki, DA). Lt. Uttam Kumar, aged 06 years, minor through Guardian Mother, Shivratri wdfo. Lt. Uttam Kumar Sahu, agd 27 years. AH resident of vinaoe Thankhaniharia. Tahsi! Saja, DisEt. Durg(CG). VERSUS Resoondents Ram Singh, $10. Raja Ram Singh, ‘Non-appiicanis. aged 37 years, Driver, MP. $tate Transport Corporation, resident of Jabaipur (MP). 2 Madhya Pradesh State Transport Corporation through Genera! Manager, MP. State Road Transport Corporation, Bhopai (MP). 3. Anmoi Prasad Jain, S/o. Bhanwar Lat Jain aged 38 years, resident of Than Khamhari Tahsil Saja Distt. Durg(C.G.). 4. The Oriental insurance Company Ltd., through Branch Manager, Post Box No. 51, Maiwiya Nagar, Durg (CG). Misc. Appea! Uis. 1T3 of the Motor Vehicies Act. b ft s k) ORSER (2? February, 23w} The feiiawing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev $upta, C.J. None for the appeuanis. (4‘) As there is no representation on beha!f of the appeliants, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want ‘ of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, ls dismissed for want of prosecution. " Sd/— 4 ’ Sdi CHIEF JUSTICE R.N.Chandrakar Judge subbu Preeent : None for the appellants