1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 4855/2009. ( State of Maharashtra and others -: versus :- Sudhir Manaji Chaware and another ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JANUARY 15, 2010. Heard Mrs. Khade, learned A.G.P.for petitioners and Shri V.P. Marpakwar, learned counsel for respondents. Learned A.G.P. contends that the petitioners went unrepresented before the Industrial Court and petitioner no.2 who made the appointment was not authorized. She contends that, in such circumstances, regularization as ordered is unsustainable. Learned counsel for respondents, states that the appointments were against the vacant post and respondents have continued for almost 11 years in time scale. He further states that, the Industrial Court has considered all the relevant provisions and granted relief of permanency from respective dates of appointment. He also fairly states that no back wages in this respect are granted. Perusal of the impugned order reveals that the Industrial Court has given present respondent nos. 1 and 2 permanency as Stenographers (lower grade) w.e.f. 2 12.01.1990 and 22.10.1990. Petitioners have been directed to extend to them benefits of permanency from the above dates. Record shows that the appointment of respondents was in the time scale of pay and as such, they are not entitled to any arrears on account of this direction. Judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court reported in the matter of M.S.R.T.C. And another .vrs. Castribe Rajya Parivahan Karmachari Sanghtana (2009 [8] SCC 556) clearly covers the controversy. Moreover, the impugned order is dated 19.03.2004 and Writ Petition has been filed on 08.09.2009. Taking over all view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. Writ Petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE Rgd.