IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr. Rev. No. 61 of 2004 Decided on: 6.1.2011 Rakesh Kumar ……….Petitioner. Versus Savitri Devi ...….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Raj Negi, Advocate vice Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent : None. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. Raj Negi, Advocate appearing vice Mr. Vivek Thakur, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that he pleads no instruction on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Consequently, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution, so also the pending application(s), if any. January 6, 2011. (Rajiv Sharma) (hl) Judge 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.