IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9078 of 2011 MD.ANWARUL HAQUE, SON OF LATE MD.TAIYAB HUSSAIN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE/MOHALLA- GAIYARI, VIA- ARARIA, POLICE STATION ARARIA, DISTRICT ARARIA. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA. 2. THE SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA. 3. THE JOINT SECRETARY,BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA. 4. THE FINANCIAL CONTROLLER-II, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA. 5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTS, BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATNA. 6. THE GENERAL MANAGER CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER, KOSI ELECTRIC SUPPLY AREA, SAHARSA. 7. THE ELECTRIC SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, ELECTRIC SUPPLY CIRCLE, PURNEA. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 19.5.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph-2(ii) of the writ petition so far as the date is concerned in course of the day. Heard Mr. S.Azim, learned counsel, who was assisted by Shri Harendra Kumar Tiwary, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Nikesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the respondents/Bihar State Electricity Board. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 30.6.2002 as Assistant Electrical Engineer from Bahadurganj Electric Supply Sub-division, has prayed 2 for directing the respondents to make payment of remaining retiral dues, which has been stated in paragraph-6 of the writ petition i.e. arrear of leave encashment amount for 240 days and arrear of revised pay scale from 1.4.1997 to 30.6.2002. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite approaching the authority by filing number of representations, the aforesaid grievances have not been redressed till date. In view of the facts and circumstances as well as the fact that petitioner retired in the year 2002, it is desirable to dispose of the writ petition granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2/Secretary, Bihar State Electricity Board within a period of six weeks from today regarding aforesaid claims. If such representation is filed, respondent no.2 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order redressing the grievances of the petitioner and also pass order for payment of the aforesaid dues within a period of four months from the date of 3 filing of such representation. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.2 is directed to pass a speaking order within aforesaid time. The respondent no.2 may also consider for paying interest on delayed payment. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)