IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21087-2011 (O&M) Date of decision:25.07.2011. Jagmohan Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Karanjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in a case registered vide FIR No.14 dated 19.07.2010, under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Sections 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC, Police Station Vigilance Bureau, Amritsar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Patwari is the main accused in this case who has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court on 02.02.2011 in CRM-M-2721-2010. He also submits that the petitioner was absolved in the inquiry by the DSP, Vigilance Bureau, Tarn Taran. On the contrary, it is apparent from the record that after the first inquiry, in another inquiry dated 10.02.2011, the DSP, Vigilance Bureau Unit, Tarn Taran had found involvement of the present petitioner. Moreover, the Patwari had been granted anticipatory bail by this Court on the ground that he is simply a Patwari and has no role in sanction and rejection of the mutation. Meaning thereby, the entire role is of the Naib Tehsildar (petitioner) in the sanction and rejection of the mutation. In view of the above, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is dismissed. July 25, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE