IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.20 of 2009 1. PUNAM KUMARI ,DAUGHTER OF RAMASHISH BHAGAT 2. BIDEYWATI KUMARI(DEVI) DAUGHTER OF RAMASHISH BHAGAT 3. RAMASHISH BHAGAT, SON OF LATE RAGHUBAR BHAGAT 4. ANIRUDH SINGH, SON OF RAMASHISH BHAGAT 5. PRADUMAN SINGH, SON OF RAMASHISH BHAGAT 6. RUKMINIA DEVI, WIFE OF RAMASHISH BHAGAT, ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NEURAHA P.O. RAHIMPUR, P.S. KHAMPUR, DISTRICT DEVARIA (U.p.)---PETITIONERS Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SIWAN 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SIWAN 4. THE INCHARGE, TOWN P.S. SIWAN 5. MADAN BHAGAT, SON OF LATE JAIGOPAL BHAGAT, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BANGARUA, P.S. BANKATA, DISTRICT DEVARIA(U.P.)----RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 10.2.2009 This application has been filed for discharge of the petitioners from Siwan Town P.S. case No. 167 of 2005 and also for quashing of the First Information Report. Mr. Ravi Bhushan Verma, appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is false and hence they deserve to be discharged and the First Information Report quashed. From perusal of the First Information Report, it is evident that a case is made out. This plea that allegation against the petitioners is false is matter of investigation. So far as prayer of discharge is concerned, the Code of Criminal Procedure has provided a detailed remedy. - 2 - In that view of the matter, the prayer made by the petitioners are absolutely misconceived. Application stands dismissed with cost of Rs.1000/- to be paid by the petitioners to the State. (Chandramauli Kr.Prasad,ACJ.) A.kumar