IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.404 of 2009 ANAMIKA PRAKASH, WIFE OF UPENDRA PRASAD @ SUDHIR KUMAR, D/O- LATE DAMODAR PRASAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- KAMRUDDINGANJ, P.S.- LAHERI (BIHAR SHARIF), DISTRICT- NALANDA. ……Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME (POLICE), GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NALANDA AT BIHAR SHARIF 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NALANDA 6. THE DY. S.P. (HEADQUARTER), NALANDA AT BIHAR SHARIF 7. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, LAHERI P.S.- BIHAR SHARIF 8. UPENDRA KUMAR @ SUDHIR KUMAR SON OF RAMJI PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NOOR NAGAR, P.S.- HARNAUT, DISTRICT- NALANDA 9. RAMJI PRASAD, SON OF LATE DUKHI MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NOOR NAGAR, P.S.- HARNAUT, DISTRICT- NALANDA. 10. SURENDRA PRASAD, SON OF RAM PRASADI MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SINDURA, P.S.- CHANDI, DISTRICT- NALANDA. ……. Respondents ----------- 2 21.05.2009 Heard Mr. Devendra Kumar Sinha learned Senior Counsel and Mr. Alok Kumar learned Assistant Counsel to G.A.-I. The writ petition has been preferred with a prayer to direct respondent nos. 9 and 10 to hand over possession of her son. Learned Government counsel raises a preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the writ petition and submits that respondent nos. 9 and 10 are not amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this Court. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application to move the appropriate forum. 2 Permission is accorded. It is made clear that this Court has not applied its mind to the merits of this case. As prayed for, this writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn. pkj (S.K. Katriar, J.) ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )