IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN TUESDAY, THE 14TH JUNE 2011 / 24TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 30442 of 2010(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- GEETHA RAGHAVAN, ATTENDER, KERALA HIGH COURT ADVOCATES' CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.SAJAN MANNALI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), ERNAKULAM-31. 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KANAYANNOOR TALUK, VALANJAMBALAM, ERNAKULAM-21. 3. THE KERALA HIGH COURT ADVOCATES' CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.E 948, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, HIGH COURT P.O., ERNAKULAM REP. BY ITS HON: SECRETARY-31. 4. THE PRESIDENT, DO. 5. ADV.M.R.NANDA KUMAR, DO. 6. ADV.PAULSON C.VARGHESE, DO. 7. ADV.VARGHESE MYLOTH, ENQUIRY OFFICER, T SQUARE LANE, PACHALOM, COCHIN-18. ADV. SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN FOR R6 GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R1 &2 SRI.H.B.SHENOY FOR R3 &4 SRI.B.ASHOK SHENOY FOR R3 &4 SMT.LAKSHMI B.SHENOY FOR R3 &4 SRI.ABU MATHEW FOR R3 &4 SRI.SOBHAN GEORGE FOR R3 &4 SRI.RAJESH NAIR FOR R7 SRI.SAIBY JOSE KIDANGOOR FOR R5 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) No.30442 OF 2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO DATED 30.10.2008 OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 : A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 5.11.2008. EXT.P3 : A TURE COPY OF THE MEMO DATED 27.1.2009 OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 : A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 13.3.2009 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P5 : A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 30.3.2009. EXT.P6 : A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 1.4.2009. EXT.P7 : A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 27.3.2009. EXT.P8 : A TURE COPY OF THE ONE SUCH REPRESENTATION DATED 8.12.2009. EXT.P9 : A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 14.7.2010. EXT.P10 : A TRUE COPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT. EXT.P10(A) : A TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P11 : A TURE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 27.9.2010. EXT.P12 : A TURE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 28.9.2010. EXT.P13 : A TRUE COPY OF THE MASS PETITION DATED 12.6.2007 EXT.P14 A TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD EVIDENCING DELIVERY OF THE REGISTERED POSTAL ARTICLE AT THE ADDRESS OF THE 7TH RESPONDENT EXT.P15 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 17.7.2010 EVIDENCING DESPATCH OF THE R7B TO THE ADDRESS OF THE 7TH RESPONDENT UNDER CERTIFICATE OF POSTING. EXT.P16 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 21.7.2010 EVIDENCING DISPATH OF THE SPEED POST ARTICLE TO THE ADDRESS OF THE 7TH RESPONDENT. (contd...) EXT.P17 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 5.10.2010 OF THE 7TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P18 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 7.12.2005. EXT.P19 A TRUE COPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT DATED 5.4.2007 SUBMITTED BY MR. BIJOY CHANDRAN, ADVOCATE. EXT.P20 A TRUE COPY OF THE DAY BOOK FOR 13.10.2008. EXT.P21 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 19.5.2009 OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPS.(AUDIT) EXT.P22 : A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER No. 1-6/2011 DATED 2.6.2011 OF THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: EXT.R4A : TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 28.5.2007. EXT.R4B : TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY LETTER DATED 10.12.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT SOCIETY. EXT.R4C : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 14.7.2010 SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE ENQUIRY OFFICER. EXT.R4D : TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF ENQUIRY INTO CHARGES AGAINST PETITIONER, RECORDED BY 7TH RESPONDENT, ON 28.6.2010. EXT.7A. : TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 10.12.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.7B. : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 14.7.2010 SENT BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.7C. : TRUE COPY OF THE ENQUIRY PROCEEDINGS RECORDED ON 28.6.2010. EXT.7D. : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 9.9.2010 ADDRESSED TO THE PETITIONER. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Kp P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 30442 OF 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of June, 2011 J U D G M E N T Sri.Sajan Mannaly, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that with the passing of the order dated 2.6.2011 by the managing committee of the third respondent society, the petitioner's grievance stands redressed and therefore the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. In the light of the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. P.N.RAVINDRAN, (JUDGE) vps