In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. Criminal Revision No.1166 of 2008 (O&M). Date of decision : 9.7.2008 Balwinder Singh @ Balu and others ..... Petitioners. vs. State of Punjab ..... Respondent. Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal. Present: Mr.Liaqat Ali, Advocate, for the petitioners. Rajesh Bindal J. Challenge in the present petition is to the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Ludhiana, dated 17.3.2008, framing charge against the petitioners under Sections 323, 324, 326 and 307 read with Section 34 IPC. The only grievance raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners is that at the most from the contents of the allegations, offence under Section 326 IPC could be made out and not under Section 307 IPC. However, I do not find any force in the submission of the learned counsel. The petitioners had caused injury to Davinder Kumar which was opined to be dangerous to life. No prejudice has been caused to the petitioners. Ultimately the petitioners may be convicted of the charges which are to be proved against them and not merely on the basis of framing of charge. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the petition and it is dismissed. As the case of the petitioners has been considered on merits, the application for condonation of delay of 13 days in filing the revision is also dismissed. 9.7.2008 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge