IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 22ND AUGUST 2008 / 31ST SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 25292 of 2008(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------------- PADMAKUMAR, CHINGALAMADATHIL, KANJIRAMATTOM, THRIPUNITHURA BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER, K.S.R.T.C., ERNAKULAM. 4. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) 25292 of 2008 -------------------------------------------------------- Dated: AUGUST 22, 2008 JUDGMENT Variation of permit was sought for by the petitioner. That was rejected by the RTA as per Ext.P1 and, in the appeal filed before the Tribunal, that order was confirmed by Ext.P5 judgment. 2. Both the authorities have concurrently found overlapping on the notified route and that the variation sought for will adversely affect the travelling public. In this writ petition I am not persuaded to take a different view, especially in the absence of any material to conclude that the concurrent findings are perverse for any reason. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-