IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-5935 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 24.02.2011 Parveen Kumar .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Jitender S. Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that earlier FIR was filed for an offence under Section 323, 324, 326, 34 IPC. Learned counsel has asserted that during the investigation Section 326 IPC was also added against the petitioner. Learned counsel has further stated that in view of the dictum of this Court in the matter of Rakesh vs. State of Haryana, CRM-M 1661 of 2011, decided on 14.2.2011, petitioner is not supposed to seek fresh bail for the newly added Section. On furnishing fresh bonds for the newly added Section, petitioner shall continue on bail, therefore, an application shall be moved before learned Magistrate for accepting fresh bail bonds for the newly added Section, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with aforesaid liberty. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (ALOK SINGH) 24.02.2011 JUDGE reena