IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5641 of 2009 MUMTAZ AHMAD @ CHUNNU @ TANNU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The Court has perused the order dated 24.9.2008 which is reasoned and discussed. This Court finds no reason to arrive at any different conclusion than that arrived at by the Court below that the application preferred under Section 311 of the Cr. P.C. for recall of P. Ws. 2 and 5 was only an attempt to fill up the lacunae in evidence, which is not permissible. The application is dismissed. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)