1 Appln 1017-2010 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1017 OF 2010 Santosh Tangachand .Applicant V/s. Shasi Mangal Singh & anr. .Respondents Mr.K.M.Prabhakaran, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.Sachin Chandan, Advocate, for Respondent No.1 Mrs.A.A.Mane, APP, for Respondent No.2 - State CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 1ST MARCH, 2011 P.C. . Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. This Revision Application is filed against the Order passed by the learned JMFC issuing process which is revisable. There is no reason as to why the applicant has approached this Court when another equally efficacious remedy was available to the applicant. The applicant must approach the 2 Appln 1017-2010 lowest Court competent to redress grievance rather than rushing to High Court. Though this Court can under Article 227 of the Constitution of India or Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure exercise its powers, it does not mean that this Court is under an obligation to entertain such application when another remedy is available to the applicant. The applicant must approach lowest Court competent to redress his grievance. 3. Criminal Application is rejected. The applicant may approach competent Court and Court would undoubtedly consider the time spent by the applicant in this Court while entertaining his Revision Application. (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)