COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BSLASPUR W.P.(S^ No. 4589 of 2005 Petitioner Versus Respondent 1. 2. 3. MadanSat Tiwari. S/o Late Shri G. L. Tiwari, Asstt Teacher, Primary Sohool, Loharsl, B'ocR & DlstS. Dhamtarl. of Chh-atltsgarh. through the Secretary, Department of Sohooi EducstloR, D. K. S. Bhavsn, Rsspur (C.G;). Dlstnct Educatt'on Officer, Dhamtari. Princlpa!, Primai'y Schoo{, Loharst, Btock & Distt. Dhamtari. SB: Hon'bie Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnlhotri, J Mlss Sunita Jain, Advocate for the peti&oner. Shr's V, V. S. Murthy, Deputy Adyocate General w'th Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the respondente O R DTR (Passed on this 30th day of March, 2007) 1. The petjtloner has fited this petltion chajtenging the Sransfer order 22.9.2001. By vlrtue of the Interim stay granted by the Madhya Pradesh Adriilnjstrative Tribunai at Raipur the petitloner Js contjnuing at the origmai place ofposfing. 2. Be that as 11 may, with the passage of time thfe petjti'on has become infructuous ss period of trsnsfer §s nct appjicable forever. AS Shis potnt of time there is no questlon to examine the vaSidit/ of ths transfer order. Howev©r,the responcSents are at liberty to pass appropriate orders keeplng in view the public interest ancS administratlve exigency, wlthout Insjsting on compliance of the impugned transfer order. 3. -Sn view of th$ above, this petition stands dlsposed of. No order as to costs. — Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Thakur