THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY C.R.P.No.663 of 2011 Date : 11-3-2011 Between : Bevara Rajeswari and another .. Petitioner and G.Suryam .. Respondent Counsel for petitioners : Sri G.Chandra Sekhara Rao Counsel for respondent : -- The Court made the following: ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of order dated 30-11-2010 in I.A.No.1412 of 2010 in O.S.No.64 of 208 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Rajam. The petitioners are the defendants in the suit filed by the respondent for mandatory and permanent injunctions. At the instance of the respondent/plaintiff, an Advocate Commissioner was appointed who after visiting the suit site and considering the work Memos issued by the parties, filed his report. The petitioners having filed their objections, have filed I.A.No.1412/2010 for reappointment of the Advocate- Commissioner on the ground that he did not execute the warrant with reference to the work memos given on their behalf. The court below having considered this application, dismissed the same. At the hearing Sri G.Chandra Sekhara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the lower court has committed an error in dismissing the application. Having carefully considered the reasons given by the lower court, I am of the opinion that the order does not suffer from any error either of law or jurisdiction. The petitioners being defendants in the suit, have already filed their objections to the Advocate-Commissioner’s report. Therefore, it is for the court below to consider the contents of the Advocate-Commissioner’s report with reference to the objections filed by the petitioners before adjudicating upon the dispute. It is therefore not necessary for the petitioners to seek reappointment of the Advocate-Commissioner to fill up gaps if any contained in the report submitted by him. For the above mentioned reasons, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. __________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY.,J Date : 11-3-2011 AM