IN THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILASPUR fCHHATTISGARHI W. P. Nb. OF 2005 ./ PETITIONER , T°>/ ...-^ ^ ^Mf^- ^ ^gyy ^''".'^i\°^'' s.---'^^> ^yy ^.}>••••' y ^Sanjiv Kumar Tiwari, S/o Shri S. S. Tiwari, aged about 37 years, Occupation - Service, Deputy Director (Public Relations) presently on the Deputation as Communication Expert, Nawa-anjore Project, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Public Relations, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETn-ION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS. PROHIBmON AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS: _L- XI-HC.78 TFRCT^mq? ^EST "yiqiri^, UTn't-i'ifi, lcirtK-iyi .l^..:f.:...4-..<?r.^.......... 3n^9Tq3q5(<^qigei<s) W^2005 an^CTwrR'ii'b aaiTan^CTaniN W! lti!*tl l!l;s!i N BH'! 11111 ti!IM '~ih4<^ S^RIIW5Hft?[ 3D^T 08/10/2006:- Mr. Manlndra ShrivastavaJ Smitha iearned counsei forthe peti( Mr. Arun Sao, learned Dy. G^ Chhattisgarh. The petitioner was workin$ of Pubite Reiations, Govt. of Ghhj 20/04/2005 he^ifter taking his con^ anjore Project under Panchayat an^ Lsarnad counsei aDpearin? memo No.C-18/94/3/1 datsd 12/1 sent on deputation normally for a p| case the services of ths petition< wlthin a period of threemonths vid^ P/1). Learnea' counsel further sub( on deputation, cannot be withdra\j the period of four years. The petiti| to the Chief Seeretary, Govt. of of his grievances in particular t| according to She petitioner, was pas sxecutive instrucSions. Havina conaidered the 31 counsel for the petitioner and circumstances of Ehe case, the Ch cbWfd'dl') >ll*lriT*t"ls><1) xRnt^ix !|?3lKl*<3II^?T learned Sr. Advocate, with oner. >vt. Advocate, for the State of s Deputy Director in the Department Uisgarh at Raipur. By order dated ent,was sent on deputation to Nawa- Rurat Deveiopment Department. Ifor the petitioner submits that GAD P/1994 provides that an officer be ffiod of four years and in the preaent have been withdrawn immedlately order dated 28/07/2005 (Annexure- Inits that the petltioner, who was sent j/n from deputation before expiry of ;i|3ner wants to make a representation Chtiattisgarh, Raipur seeking redressa! tfie order dated 28/07/2005 which, }sed confrary to the provisions of the i(bmissions made by the learned takina note of the Tacts and sf Secretary, Go'st. of Chhaffisgarh, lj::':^:"'1- l.-3i^1i lis.'aafi) XI-HC-78 Hl*1ri| a?*nq» vjt;T| •-01<4Irt<4, ytTlt-l'IS, (qrtl'iiy'i ^•P- .^^e&. sn^9Tv^s ('j^g^s) W^2005 sn^nwR'ii* ;raT3iii»T*ii<i' •••s'^'s-^ eA+ 1s to consider and decide petitioner within a period of six w{ representation. in the meantime, t| as Deputy Direotor in Nawa-anjore| Development Department, Raipur. :he representatton, if any, flled by ths ieks from the date of receipt of the >e petitioner is permitted to continue Project under Panehayat and Rural in view ofme foregoing, the ^ <bl^Id41'i llldl'^fls'd '(IvltCK S|?3lRl*13II^?T etifjon stands disposed of. !'"!• ffl!