IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.431 of 2002 SMT.SUMITRA DEVI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . For the Appellant: Mr. Shivajee Pandey, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nalin Vilochan Tiwary, Adv. For the State: Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, S.C. 16. ----------- 4/ 20/04/2010 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State. In a controversy between the appellant claiming title through a gift deed in context of another gift deed executed by one who, she alleges, is not the adopted son of her parents, when the relief to the petitioner shall be forthcoming only when the gift deed executed by the allegedly adopted son shall be challenged before a proper civil forum, we see no reason to interfere with the conclusion in the impugned judgement that matters can be only considered in a duly constituted suit. Mutation per se is not evidence of title and any mutation entries cannot affect any rights of title, more so, when it may be decreed by a competent court of law. The impugned order calls for no interference as the appellant has not been left remediless. The application is dismissed. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.) (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)