<T,S^rfZ^- ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILASPUR rCHHATTISGARHy -3313 W. P. N0. OF 2004 PETITIONER .%«? ^••••" ^ RESPONDENTS M.M. Khan S/o Late Shri M.M. Khan, aged about 50 years, Occupation - Service, posted Assistant Mining Officer [substantively holding the post of Mining Inspector] 0/0 The Collector, Raigarh District Raigarh [C.G] VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Mining, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur [Chhattisgarh]. 2. Director, Geology & Mining Chhattisgarh, Sonakhan Bhawan, Ring Road, No.l, Village Ravigram, Raipur [CG] ^L^ 3. M. L. Kesharwani, Assistant Mining Officer, District Office Dhamtari [Chhattisgarh] 4. Y. R. Sahu, Assistant Mining Officer, District Office Raipur Dist Raipur [Chhattisgarh] 5. Dilip Dongaonkar, Assistant Mining Officer, District Office Bilaspur [Chhattisgarh] 6. R. R. Khan, Assistant Mining Office, Directorate of Central Flying Squad, Raipur [CG] 7. R.P. Shukla, Assistant Mining Officer, District Office Rajnandgaon [Chhattisgarh] 8. J. P. Guru, Assistant Mining Officer, District Office, Bastar District Bastar [Chhattisgarh] <y WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT W NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS. ORDER OR ORDERS: XI-HC-22 37T^T'^T f<^i<=b ^^ 5h^ict» ^f^^t •3"°?^TR^FT. ^ftW1?, Tqciwy 3n^?r T^? ^3.^.^.0. 3-S 13/2-010^ ^.....................................^. ^ MW^l{ ^bHlcb •^^s' S^V ^<TT^R ^f^a 28/10/2004 Shn Maiundra Shrivastava,| Shri Somesh Bajaj, D^puty Govt. Advocate for the Respondents No,l and 2. Smt, Foiizia Mirza, counsel The petitioner has preferre4 vaMditv of thc ordcr dated 10, Gcology & Mitiing, Chhattisgarh, the Respondenta No, 3 to 8 andj List dated 22.5.2004 fixing the s<| Respondents No, 3 to 8. Learaed coiinsel for fhe pe1 was appoiated as Mirung Inspectc|: he was not confiraied tiU 1990. appointed subsequent to the pi-omoted but ftie petitioner hi petitioner was regularly makuig raismg his grievaace regardmg hii to this effect was made m the ye^ cbNid4l4 'WRTt^ 'feTst ^fo^K ^ 3iPa*i SR^I: couasel for flie Petitioner. br fhe Respondent No.5, this writ petition questioniag the ?,2004 passcd by the Dircctor, Saipur issuiag proraotion order^ of the correctaess of the Gradation. sruority of the petitioner below fhe ^tioner subinits that the petitioner •tcjr in the year 1976 axxd siace then '"he Respondents No. 3 to 8 were |)etitioner aiid fhey have been ts not yet been promoted. The rcbrcsentations smce the year 1992 semority. The last reprcsentation 2004 but the respondents No. 1 r~ -T- XI-HC-22 3:n^r'^T 'f^ri^T 3T?t?T 9h^icti ^n ^. •Thgikur ^ ^y^>:Y\ ~s^ ^i^iicn^,'gT^PTS,'f^TRTy '0'; *<l^cfll <5hNlch 3TT^?T '^3ra? ^.!P. 33 lJ5/'2-Ot3^, ^•""•""•"""•"••""""""•"^'200 •^S^Vt' aiid 2 have. uot yet decided Uis respondents be directed to petitioner aad pass orders m counsel for the State and Responc^' Having heard leanied coun^i the facts and circuiastances of th^ thc Ujnited praycr inade by appears to bc reasonable, directed to decide the d4cide accdrdaiice representption Consequently, M(W)P No. 2^ also staad disposed of. Certified copy as per Rules. chNfo^l^ 'WT^f ^ ft^ <ptt^l< ^ 3?Tf;<TH 3?IT^T representation, tlieretbre, flie the representatioii of the with law, to which learaed ?nt No.5 have no objection. i^el for ftie parties, havmg regard to case, ia the opiaion of this Court le^mcd counscl for the petitioncr Th^rcforc, thc rcspondent No,l is xnade by the petitioner iai of 30 days froin the date of accordmice wifh law wifhin a pe^iod receipt of copy of this order, sjfter affording an opportuiiity of hearbig to fhe petitioner, Wifh fhe direction aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. 29|14/2004 and I.A. No. 7072/2004 Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [^ ^fo^ ^'