IN THE HIGH CO0URT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 230 OF 2008 Chandar Rau Madame : Appellants v/s Shrimant Vijaysinh Malojiraje Nail-Nimbalkar : Respondents Filip Bodake for appellants Coram : S.J. Vazifdar, J Date : 19.6.2008 P.C. The impugned order warrants no interference. The decree was drawn up pursuant to the judgment of the lower appellate court. The judgment of the lower appellate court has admittedly attained finality. Even according to the petitioners the judgment required the suit property to be handed over to the plaintiff/respondent by removing “structures” standing on the suit property. The drawn up decree inadvertently mentioned the word “Temporary Zhopdi”. The learned judge found that the drawn up decree contain a wrong translation of the judgment itself. It is not open to the petitioners to contend in these proceedings that the judgment was erroneous in view of the prayers itself seeking the removal only of a temporary structure. Till the judgment of the lower appellate court is modified the drawn up decree must be in accordance with the same. In the circumstances the CRA is dismissed.