IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.893 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision : 10.02.2010 Randhir Singh .....Petitioner Versus Pavitarjit Singh & anr. ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for the petitioner. * * * Rakesh Kumar Garg,J.(Oral) The petitioner, who was defendant before the trial court, has filed the instant petition, challenging the impugned order dated 20.01.2010 whereby, the application filed by the defendant under Order 14, Rule 5 for framing additional issues has been dismissed. Challenging the aforesaid order, learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that the issues as prayed are necessary to be framed on the basis of the pleadings of the parties. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. From the perusal of the record of this revision, I find that the pleadings, on the basis of which the issues are now being claimed, were already before the trial court when issues were Civil Revision No.893 of 2010(O&M) ..2... framed on 09.02.2004. In fact, practically, the trial is at the fag end as both the parties have already led their evidence and the case is now fixed for rebuttal evidence and arguments. There is no explanation on behalf of the petitioner, as to why the aforesaid issues which are now being claimed, were not claimed at the time of framing the original issues. No merits. Dismissed. 10.02.2010 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) Seema-II Judge