1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3172 OF 2010 Bhartiya Mahila Vikas Mandal Hanegaon Through its Secretary Sow.Hurmat Begum w/o Vazioddin Chamkude. .. Petitioner Versus Union of India and ors. .. Respondents ... Mr S.R.Palnitkar, Advocate for petitioner Mr.R.P.Phatake,Standing Counsel for Union of India. Mr S.K.Kadam, A.G.P. for respondent State. Shri V.S.Panpatte,Adv.for respondent no.6. ... CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND T.V.NALAWADE, JJ. DATE : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2011 PER COURT 1. The petitioner prayed for following reliefs : B] By writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction in like nature the respondent no3 be directed to decide the pending proposals [annexed at exh.B to the present petition] and to forward the same to respondent no.1 and 2 with favourable 2 recommendation. C] The respondent no.1 and 2 be directed to call the proposals from the respondent no.3 and process the same. D] By writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction in like nature the respondent no.1 and 2 be directed to decide the proposals and sanction the same." 2] The petitioner's contention is that for modernization of Madarsa which is run by the petitioner, certain funds under the Central Government scheme were required. The petitioner did not get it. On notice, respondent filed affidavit in reply. The deponent stated that initial scheme was introduced by the Government of India in the year 1990 which was revised on 29/10/2008. The guidelines prescribed for submitting new proposals under the scheme accordingly were issued by government of Maharashtra. Vide Government Resolution dated 10/2/2009, fresh proposals were invited under "The Scheme for Providing Quality Education in Madarasas" [For short "SPQEM". It is contended that since petitioner submitted proposals as per old scheme, the proposals were not accepted. 3] The counsel for the petitioner submitted that new proposal is already submitted, copy of which is placed on record alongwith proposed amendment. In case, petitioner has already forwarded said proposal to the State Government, we expect the State Government to consider the same in accordance with proposed scheme as early as possible. 3 4] With these observations and directions, Petition is disposed of. 5] In view of disposal of Writ Petition, Civil Application No. 24736/2011 is disposed of. ( T.V. NALAWADE, J. ) ( NARESH H.PATIL, J. ) umg/wp3172-10