IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.1106 of 2008 Iqalak Rahim Shaikh ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. Mr P. R. Arjunwadkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr S. S. Pednekar, APP for the Respondent. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.C. DAGA,J. V.C. DAGA,J. V.C. DAGA,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 09.06.2008. 09.06.2008. 09.06.2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State. 2. Perused impugned order refusing bail to the present applicant dated 12.3.2008 passed by the Additional Sssions Judge, Thane in Criminal M. A. No. 353 of 2008. 3. It is absolutely clear that the impugned order does not contain any reason. It is needless to mention that when the application for bail is moved, the Court is expected to prima facie deal with the contention and prima facie come to the conclusion whether bail is to be granted or not. The order is cryptic, casual and purfunctory. 4. In this view of the matter, the impugned order is set aside without examining merits or demerits thereof. Cri. M.A. No.353 of 2008 is restored to the file of the Trial Court. The matter be remitted back to the Court of Sessions Thane for consideration afresh. 5. The learned Sessions Judge, Thane is expected to deal with the contentions of the parties and give prima facie reasons for refusal of bail so as to enable the higher Court to read its mind. 6. Parties are directed to appear before the learned Trial Judge on 16.6.2008. 7. The Trial Court is, thus, directed to disposed of the said application, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one week from the date of receipt of authenticated copy of this order. 8. The application is accordingly disposed of in the above terms. (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.)