..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1028 OF 2001 Anantha Krishna. ..Applicant. Versus Vishnu Mordani and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.Umesh Shetty, Adv. a/w. Yamini Chaudhari, Adv. i/b. M/s. Umesh Shetty & Co. for the applicant. Ms.A.A.Mane, APP, for the State. .... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : 22nd October, 2008 DATE : 22nd October, 2008 DATE : 22nd October, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant-orig.accused and the learned A.P.P. for the State. None appears for the respondent No.1-orig.complainant though served. 2. The applicant is seeking quashing of process issued by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 44th Court at Andheri, Mumbai in Criminal Complaint No.2064/S/2000. In the said case process was issued under Sections 405, 406, 409 and 420 of Indian Penal Code. ..(2).. 3. It is seen that the stage of the case is that only process has been issued against the applicant. It is clear that if the process is quashed, the entire proceeding in respect of the applicant would come to an end. 4. For the reasons recorded in the order passed by this Court in the case of V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; V.K.Jain Vs. P.V.Padode; 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, 2005(3) Mh.L.J.778, which has been upheld by the Hon’ble Apex Court I am of the opinion that the applicant has an efficacious remedy of preferring revision against the order of Magistrate issuing process. Hence, in my view, it would be appropriate that the applicant prefers a revision before the concerned Sessions Court against the order of the Magistrate issuing process. 5. Liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer the necessary revision before the concerned Sessions Court. The learned Advocate for the applicant makes a statement that the necessary revision will be preferred within ten weeks from today. In view of this statement, the trial Court shall not proceed with the trial for a period of ten weeks. ..(3).. 6. If the revision is preferred within ten weeks, delay, if any, in preferring the revision be condoned. On the necessary revision being preferred by the petitioners before the concerned Sessions Court, the concerned Sessions Court shall dispose of the matter on merits after hearing the necessary parties. 7. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]