1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Second Bail Application No. 10290/2010 Jagdish Sherawat Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 26.11.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Raj Kumar Jain - for the petitioner Mr NR Saran, PP – for the State BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is behind bars for the last more than two and half years. First bail application was dismissed by this court, however, trial court was directed to complete the trial within four months. However, period of more than seven months have already elapsed and still 15 witnesses are to be examined. The complainant-Babu Lal, in his court statement, made allegations against Bodu and Ratanlal. Petitioner will otherwise face the trial. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. 2 Accordingly, bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Jagdish Sherawat may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 627/2008 registered at Police Station – Chomu, Jaipur for offence under Section/s 364, 302, 120-B and 201 IPC provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma