1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9890 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.9890 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.9890 OF 2004 Namdev Bhavanji Thombre & Anr. .. Petitioners. Vs. Krishna Bhavanji Thombre & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Madhav Jamdar for the petitioners. Mr.Rajesh P.Behere for the respondents. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 17TH DECEMBER, 2004 DATED : 17TH DECEMBER, 2004 DATED : 17TH DECEMBER, 2004 P.C.: . Heard Mr.Jamdar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Behere, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Mr.Jamdar, learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing this petition for sometime and after having realised that I was not inclined to interfere with the impugned order fairly stated that the reasons need not be recorded for disposing of this writ petition. He further prayed for directions to the trial court to dispose of the suit within time frame granted by the impugned order dated 27.10.2004. Hence I pass the following order: 2 2 2 (a) The trial court shall endeavour to decide the suit within time frame as per the order dated 27.10.2004 passed in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.281 of 2004. (b) The trial court to decide the suit on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the orders passed at interlocutory stage. (c) The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.) (D.B.Bhosale, J.)