HIGH coum OF cnnm'nsGARn. mmspua wags; no. 5968 of 2007 PETITIONER Smt. Namita Rai Wifti of Late Shri Jagdao Rai, aged about 43 years, A.N.M.{Nurse), Scction Dauna Sub Health Centre Lanjeet, Tahsil Surajpur, District Sm‘g11ja(CG) K Versus ESPONDENTS 1. Stats of Chhattisgarh, through The Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, DKS Bhawan, Raiput1CG) 2. The Collector, Ambikapur, District Surguja(CG) 3. The Chief Medical and Health (mica, Ambikapur, Distn'ct Surguja(CG) 4. The Block Madical O$ce13 Odgl, Tehsil Surajpur, District Surg‘ujaKlG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA Appearance: Shrj O.P.Yadav, counSel for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (09. 10.20073 SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard on admission. Learned counsel for petitioner argues that the petitioner is working on. the post of A.N.M.(Nurse), Section Danna, Sub Health Centre Lanjeet, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (CG). He submits that though the petitioner has performed her duties in the relevant period i.e. from the month of July, 2001 to the month of July, 2006, but salary for the said period has not been, paid to her. He further submits that in this regard, representations were made by the petitioner and even a legal notice dated 4.7.2007 was also sent to the Chief Medical and Health. Officer, Amhikapur, District Surguja(CG) and the Block Medical Odicer, Odgi, Tahsi]. Surajpur, District Surguja(CG). Learned counsel further submits that when the petitioner goes to make request to the concerned authority, even they do not tell R 2 WP. (S) 190.5963 of 2007 the masons m the petitioner and. tha ultimate result is that the: petitioner has not been paid salaty for the said pan'od. After hearing learned counscl for the petitiongr as also the State and after going through the contents of the Wn't petition and the documents annexed. with the petition, I am of the opinion that the ends of justice would he served if the petitioner is directed to file a replesentation before respondent No, 3 and Iespondent No.3 is directed to dispose of her representation Within the stipulated period granted by this Court by passing a reasoned order on the said representation. Consequently, this petition is disposed of with a direction that if so advised, the petitioner may tile a detailed representation Within a. period. of 3 weeks fiotn today along with a copy of this order and. a copy of writ petition. before respondent No,3 i.e. the Chief Medical. and Health Officer, Amhikapnr, District SurgujqCG) and. if such a representation is tiled, the said authority shall dispose of the same as early as possible preferably Within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the said representation by passing a. reasoned order on the grievance of the petitioner with regard to the issue raised in the representation as also in this writ petition. With the above observations, this petition stands hnally If disposed of at this stage. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge sunita (