3%15 aggw Qgw’bl_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) w.P. ( S) No. ELM? [2010 Sukh Ram Dhruwa S/o— late B. R. Dhruwa, aged about 61 years, Retired Assistant Sub Inspector (R.P.F.) I.V.G./Z.H.Q., South Eastern Central Railway Biiaspur (C.G.), R/o- Bangalipara Gali No. -05, ward no. 46, Sarkanda, District— Biiaspur (C.G.) PETITION ER VERSUS ”1. RESPONDENTS South Eastern Central Railway,‘ Through the Chief Security Commissioner, Rail Protection Force, south Eastern Central Railway, Bilaspur (C.G.) Staff Officer, Office of the Chief Security Commissioner, Rail Protection Force, South Eastern Central Railway, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDE'R ARTICLE 226 OF THE R CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. -\ / K Wm - . uFL§No72%/1o Vi 200 mm 10-12-2016: Ms. F.S. Khare, counsei for the ‘ Ms. Nausana-Afreen Ali, couns hat despite the order has been passed in favour of the petitioner b this Court on 20.7.2010 in writ petition {8) No. 4157/2009, resp ndents have not made any payment to the petitioner. Counsel tor the respondents ubmits that in the order dated ere given opportunity to take approptiate decision in acoordano with iaw, after affording due opportunity to the petitioner. She su mits that the respondents have already issued two notices to the p titioner but as the address was incompiete, notice could not be se ved to him, however, now the ,. petitioner has received the notice d ted 8.12.2010 and he has been asked to appear before the respon ent No. 1 on 16.12.2010. She further submits that petitioner has een asked to present his case and if the p titio a petitioner. al for the respondents. Grievance of the petitioner is 26.7.2010 itseit the respondents ner wili duty oo-oper te during the hearing, the order wouid be passed in accordance wth iaw within two months from 15.1 2.2m Q. Souneel for the petitioner as ures that petitioner would fully oo-operate with the‘autnonties /‘ grog-— a d wiii not seek unnecessary ,/ adjournment. W m m farm"m Elm-11% 31m man ma WW mud? wm a; am m 8.3: Hen’bHe Justice Mr. Pfiiinker Diwaker XI—HC-22 " in View of the statement r petition is diswsed of reserving the peti’t-ion in caee any dispute arises. ’ ;; Pritinker Diwaker ‘ Judge Sd/- itiir‘i‘ efm made by the parties, the present right of the petitioner to tile fresh 1