@ 11w x @ u a “Egg: -HC——7s @lw‘ 9 mm “W0 $13 1112003 28-1 -2009:- Shri Somkarit Verma, counse for the petitioner; MissSunita Jain, Panel Lawy r for the $tate/respondents. Heard. ' By the present petition the petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to pay‘the' etitioner annuai increments and seniority from the date of his initial appointm‘ nt in the light of decision rendered by the O A No 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and s) dated 24 8 1992 and aiso by this Court ' M P State Administrative Tribunal 56 others Vs State of M P and ot r inwp (s)No6681/6 Case of the petitioner Is that e was appomted as Assrstant Teacher on he fxed spay scaie of Rs 1200l- A er compietlon of probation penod he was A Shri Dhirendra'Mishra J. g i ‘ h t mm(a§iaa{u) 3911mm s ' mmm ' mmnwm' hwm EEIB'JQNEB Kuleshwar Ram Sahu Age about 50 years Astt Teacher S/o Shri Hichha Ram Sahu Govt Primary Schooi Nayak Bandha, Block Abhanpur District Raipur (CG) —Versus- RESPONDENTS , ~ 1. ' State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Education Department, D.K.s. Bhawan, Distt. Raipur (CG) 2. Distt. Education Officer; Raipur, Distt Raipur(CG) 3. Block Education Officer Abhanpur Distt Rarpur(CG) 4. Treasury, Account & Pension, ' Raipur, Distt'. Raipur(CG) <" XIéHc—7s mwmm mm , 111200 mm(a§iaaw) mmm mm fs€tm~ ‘- " awrmm e .‘a, ,; ,, was am xb ~ New“; - t has not been given to him Other imilarly situated teachers aggrieved by the aforesasd actlon of the responde , moved the State Admumstratlve Tribunal, Jabalpur for grant of regular pay scale from the date of initial appointment wherein ’learned Tribunal vide ord r dated 24.8.1992 aitowed the same. This Court also while considering the s me issue in WP. (S) No.6681106 vide order ' dated 7.12.2006 directed the resp dent authorities to consider the case of the petitioners of that petition Th petitioner herein also approached the respondent authoritles to accord same treatment as he is aiso similarly situated but the respondents have ot paid any heed Learned eounsei for the p tioner submits that the petitioner may be allowed to make arepresentation efore the respondent No.1 for giving similar treatment to the petitioner rand ame pay-scale, which has already been sanctioned to other similarly sit amaéwm from the date of receipt of the rep esentation, after considering all the points : raised by the petitione’r and aki = Administrative Tribunal-andthis Co rt. into account the orders passed by the teachers on acoount of the order of the State Administrative Tribunal‘andt is Court Learned counsel for the Ste has no obiection if the petition is disposed of With a direction to the responden to conSIder case of the petitioner in View of the above submis ions of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of with iib to the petitioner to make a detailed representation along with certified py of this order to respondent No.1 raising all his grievances, raised in this etition, and on such representation being made, respondent No.1 shall deci e the same within a period of‘eight weeks , sd/_ Dhirendra Mlshra i ’7 Judge n n u d e