1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.2822 OF 2005 Shaikh Mohd. Shabbir. ...Petitioner. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents. .... None for the Petitioner. Mrs. J. S. Pawar, Addl. G.P. for the Respondents. ..... CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JJ. October 7, 2005. P.C. When the matter is called out, the Petitioner was not present. Earlier the petition was dismissed on 5th September 2005 as the Petitioner was not present. 2. The Learned Addl.GP points out that the Petitioner has a remedy by way of revision under the provisions of Section 10A of the Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923. The Learned Addl. G.P. made a statement that if within six weeks from today, the Petitioner filed a revision, the same will be heard and disposed of on merits. In the light of that the following order: 2 The Petition is dismissed. The Petitioner to file a revision. If such an application is filed within six weeks from today, the State Government will hear and dispose of the same on merits. (F. I. Rebello, J.) (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)