cp89.11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 89 OF 2011 Trimbak s/o Dada Tagad & another .. PETITIONERS VERSUS Sitaram Kunte & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. D.R. Markad, advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.D. Kaldate, AGP for the State. ===== CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 15 th MARCH, 2011. PER COURT : 1 This court while disposing of Writ Petition no. 2244/2009 directed the State authorities to allot and handover possession of land admeasuring 1 H 46 R out of any nearby available suitable land to respondent nos. 6 and 7 till 31 st December, 2010. The concerned respondents were also directed to take over possession of petitioners’ land admeasuring 1 H and 46 R out of survey no. 31 i.e. Gat no. 149 of village Nandur Vihire, Tq. Shevgaon, Dist. Ahmednagar. cp89.11 2 2 Learned AGP has presented affidavit on behalf of respondent no. 4 i.e. the Deputy Collector, ( Rehabilitation), Ahmednagar. It is stated in the affidavit in reply that the earlier order passed in respect of allotment of land to project affected persons has been cancelled on 9-3-2011 and respondent no. 4 has passed order on the same day and allotted lands Gat no. 37/3/B admeasuring 80R, G. No. 76/2 admeasuring 34 R and G. No. 82/1/1b admeasuring 41 R, total 1 H 55 R in favour of the petitioners. An attempt was made to handover possession to the petitioners. However, they refused to accept the same. 3 Learned counsel appearing for the contempt petitioners, on instructions from his clients, states that his clients are prepared to accept possession of the lands alloted to them and the respondents / officials be directed to comply with the order passed on 9-3-2011 and handover possession of the lands allotted in favour of the contempt petitioners. 4 Learned AGP makes a statement that the order passed by respondent no.4 on 9-3-2011 would be implemented and possession of the lands would be handed over to the contempt petitioners within a period of four weeks. In this view of the matter, order passed in Writ Petition no. cp89.11 3 2244/2009 has been substantially complied with and there is no reason to entertain the instant contempt petition. Contempt petition stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE dyb