SRJ 1 wp-2484-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2484 OF 2010 Haresh N. Chheda .. Petitioner V/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. .. Respondent. Mr. G.S.Godbole i/b. Mr. S.A. Ronghe, for Petitioner. CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE :7th APRIL,2010 P.C.:- 1] Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. This Writ Petition filed under article 227 of Constitution of India arises out of the two suits filed by the Petitioner. One of the suits is Special Civil Suit No. 26 of 2001. The said suit is filed by the Petitioner for injunction restraining the Respondent from dispossessing him from the suit property. The said suit was filed in the Court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Panvel. Regular Civil Suit No.99 of 2001 has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondent. The suit has been filed for SRJ 2 wp-2484-10.sxw a declaration that the purported termination dealership agreement by the Respondent is illegal and null and void. Consequential relief of permanent injunction has been claimed in the said suit. This suit was filed in the Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Panvel. 2] By order dated 10th January, 2001 passed on application filed by the Respondent under the section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the said Code), the learned Principal District Judge, Raigad passed an order directing the transfer of Special Civil Suit No.26 of 2001 to the Court of learned Joint Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Alibag. The said order was passed on application made by the Respondent making allegations of bias against learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Panvel before whom the suit was pending. 3] By judgment and order dated 7th October, 2009, this Court disposed of Civil Revision Applications, an Appeal from Order and a Writ Petition arising out of the orders passed in the said two suits. This Court expedited hearing of the suits and directed that the hearing should be concluded on or before 30th April, 2010. This Court observed that if the suits are pending in different Courts, the learned Principal District Judge, Raigad shall pass an administrative Order of assigning the suits to one and the same Court. It must be noted here that on the basis of the order dated 7th October, 2009 passed by this Court, the learned Principal District Judge transferred SRJ 3 wp-2484-10.sxw Regular Civil Suit No.99 of 2001 filed by the Petitioner which was pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Panvel to the Court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Alibag where Special Civil Suit filed by the Petitioner was already pending. On 24th February 2010, the Petitioner made an application under section 24 of the said Code for transfer of both the suits to the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Panvel. It was contended in the said application filed by the Petitioner that on the basis of the application made by the Respondent, the Special Civil Suit No.26 of 2001 was transferred to the Court at Alibag only on the ground that allegations of bias were made by the Respondent against learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Panvel, at Panvel before whom the suit was pending. It is contended that now the said ground is not in existence, as the concerned Judge has been transferred long back. It was contended that both the suits were filed in the Court at Panvel and, therefore, both the suits be sent to the Court at Panvel considering the convenience of the parties. By the impugned order, the said application has been rejected. 4] The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submitted that the Special Civil Suit pertains to the jurisdiction of the Court of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Panvel and the Regular Civil Suit filed by the Petitioner also pertains to the jurisdiction of a Court at Panvel. He submitted that on the basis of allegations made by the Respondent in the year 2001, the SRJ 4 wp-2484-10.sxw Special Civil Suit was transferred from the Court at Panvel to the Court at Alibag. He submitted that now the situation has changed as the learned Judge against whom allegations were made has been transferred and, therefore, the said suit must be now transferred back to the original Court where it was filed. He submitted that the Regular Civil Suit filed by the Petitioner will have to be heard alongwith the Special Civil Suit and, therefore, the said suits have to be transferred to the Court at Panvel. He submitted that the Court at Panvel is more convenient to both the parties. 5] I have given careful consideration to the submissions.When this Court passed an order on 7th October, 2009, the Petitioner was represented by a Counsel. The Petitioner was fully aware that the Special Civil Suit filed by him was pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Alibag and the Regular Civil Suit was pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division)at Panvel. After hearing the counsel representing both the parties and in the presence of the Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, this Court directed the learned Principal District Judge to transfer the suits to one and the same Court. Further direction was issued for concluding the trial of the suits on or before 30th April, 2010. When time bound schedule was fixed by this Court, a request ought to have been made to this Court for transferring both the suits to the Court at Panvel. When the order dated 7th September, 2009 was being passed, in fairness, the SRJ 5 wp-2484-10.sxw Petitioner ought have pointed out that he desired to apply for transfer of the suit pending in the Court at Alibag to the Court at Panvel. Moreover, the Petitioner allowed the order dated 7th October, 2009 to be acted upon. On the basis of the order of this Court, the learned Principal District Judge transferred the Regular Civil Suit filed by the Petitioner to Court at Alibag, where the other suit filed by the Petitioner was already pending. Thereafter, on 24th February, 2010, Petitioner filed the application for transfer on which the impugned order has been passed. The Special Civil Suit filed by the Petitioner was transferred to the Court at Alibag way back in the year 2002. The Petitioner had no grievance about the pendency of the suit in the Court at Alibag till 7th October, 2009 when this Court passed the aforesaid order. After hearing the Petitioner, a direction was issued by this Court to dispose of both the suits on or before 30th April, 2010. Considering the aforesaid aspects, no interference can be made with the impugned order. Reliance was sought to be placed on the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Indian Overseas Bank, Madras vs. Chemical Construction Company and Others [(1979) 4 SCC  358]. The said decision will have no application in as much as from the year 2002 till February 2010, the Petitioner had no grievance about pendency of his Special Civil Suit in the Court at Alibag. SRJ 6 wp-2484-10.sxw 6] Considering the conduct of the Petitioner and considering the earlier order of this Court passed on 7th October, 2009, no interference is called for with the impugned order. Writ Petition is rejected. Time for disposal of the suits is extended till 31st August, 2010. (A.S.OKA,J.)