IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.49622 of 2007 MD.CHOTTU Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 01.05.2008 Heard. The death occurred in the house of the deceased by a gun shot injury. There is no allegation of house breaking. One of the inmates of the house has reported that the wife of the deceased was having an illicit relationship with the petitioner. It is not known, at least the learned counsel appearing before this Court, after perusing the carbon copy of the case diary, could not inform this Court, as to whether the murder weapon was recovered and if so, whether the same contains any finger print or not. The case diary admittedly does not suggest that the police has investigated the whereabouts of the petitioner at the time of occurrence. In such a situation even on the basis of supervisory endorsement made on the case diary, no light is thrown upon which prima facie it can be held that the petitioner may not be involved with the incident. As a result, the application for grant of anticipatory bail fails and the same is dismissed. S.B.P. (Barin Ghosh, J.)