IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17307 of 2010 SARFUDDIN ANSARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4/ 11.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Any sexual intercourse with the complainant is denied with submission that if really there was some relation then that was consented one. Further, according to the learned counsel, demand for dues is the reason for false implication of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 163 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sikrahana at Motihari subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)