hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 554 OF 2010 Dimple Sandeep Mahinda and Ors. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Anas Shaikh i/by Jamila Shaikh for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for State. Mr. N.N. Gavankar with Mr. Arfan Sait for R. Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 17TH AUGUST, 2010 P. C.: Heard. Petitioners were aggrieved by the show cause notice issued under Section 107 read with section 111 of the Cr.P..C. The learned A.P.P. based on the written instructions received by the Tardeo Police Station states that the proceedings were filed and order under section 117 of the Cr.P.C. has already been passed. Petitioners have furnished their bonds on 5.5.2010. The Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 also faced the same proceedings and they have furnished bonds on 4.5.2010 and 7.5.2010. Obviously these are counter complaints against each other. Nothing further survives in this petition and the same is disposed of as infructuous. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (B.H. MARLAPALLE,J.)