IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.3336-39-C of 2009 & RSA No.1144 of 2009 DECIDED ON : 10.08.2009 Mewa ...Appellant versus Ram Mehar & others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. P.L.Verma, Advocate for the appellant. **** 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporter or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) CM No.3337-C of 2009 For the reasons recorded in the application, the delay of 25 days in filing the petition is condoned. CM stands disposed of. RSA No.1144 of 2009 This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the appellant that appellant is exclusive owner of property marked with letters A,B,C&D on account of partition/family settlement. The following questions have been proposed: a) Whether plot allotted to Harijan of village can not inherited by his heirs? RSA No.1144 of 2009 -2- b) Whether the separate living of each parties does without interference of each other proves oral partition? Question (a) & (b) are pure question of facts. Both the Courts below have found a fact that the appellant was not able to prove the factum of partition/family settlement. Learned counsel has taken me through the findings of the Courts below but has not been able to persuade me that the findings are either based on no evidence or on such mis-reading of evidence so as to render them perverse. Consequently, this appeal and application for stay are dismissed. Since the main case has been decided, all the other pending civil miscellaneous applications, if any stand disposed of. August 10, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE