IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 4354 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.11.2010. M/s Chauhan Realcon Pvt. Ltd. and another ....Petitioners Versus Chet Ram and others. ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahesh Grover Present:- Mr. Vikram Punia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Navneet Singh, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 2. MAHESH GROVER, J (Oral) There is no legal infirmity in the impugned order, therefore, the impugned order cannot be interfered in the revisional jurisdiction. The respondents have been permitted to withdraw the suit subject to payment of costs. It is the case of respondent No.1 that he wanted to plead the factum of civil death of his father which prompted him to file the application for withdrawal of the suit with liberty to file a fresh one. It is further pointed out that the petitioner who is the subsequent purchaser of the suit property was impleaded in May 2010 and that no prejudice is being caused to the petitioner in the eventuality of the impugned order being permitted to exist. The contention raised by learned counsel for respondents No. 1 and 2 merits acceptance. Therefore, the petition is held to be without any merit. Dismissed. (MAHESH GROVER) 15.11.2010 JUDGE Reema