THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.22996 of 2007 Between: Smt.Pothula Lingamma. .. PETITIONER and The Revenue Divisional Officer and others. .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.22996 of 2007 ORDER: It is the case of the petitioner that her husband got agricultural land admeasuring Ac.20-00 gts. in Sy.No.270 situated at Ganyagula Village, Nagarkurnool Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District, having acquired through his ancestors. In addition to that, her husband purchased the land admeasuring Ac.8-05 gts. in Sy.No.270 situated at Ganyagula Village, Nagarkurnool Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District, from one Smt.Chinna Rathnamma, W/o. Sri Chinna Lakshma Reddy, through an unregistered Sale Deed, dated 20-05- 1965, and her husband was put in possession of the said land. The petitioner and her husband were cultivating the said lands. Her husband died in the year 1981. Thereafter, the land admeasuring Ac.20-00 gts was mutated in the name of the 4th respondent, who is the son of the petitioner, in the revenue records, through appropriate proceedings. Further, in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.8-05 gts., the name of the petitioner was mutated in the revenue records through the order of the Tahsildhar, Nagarkurnool, in proceedings in ROR/7036/05, dated 14-12-2005. Aggrieved by the said proceedings, the 4th respondent filed an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Nagarkurnool, and the Revenue Divisional Officer, Nagarkurnool, through his order, dated 16-11-2006, in proceedings No.K/ROR/76/2006, while setting aside the order of the Mandal Revenue Officer, dated 14-12-2005, directed the 2nd respondent herein to enter the name of the 4th respondent as pattadar in the revenue records in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.8-05 gts. in Sy.No.270 of Ganyagula village. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner filed a revision along with stay application on 24-11-2006 before the Joint Collector and the same are pending. It is stated that so far the stay application has not been disposed of. It is stated that even before stay application is disposed of, the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer is sought to be implemented. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that it is just and proper to direct the Joint Collector to consider and dispose of the stay application pending in Revision Case No.D1/80/A/06. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of the stay application pending in Revision Case No.D1/80/A/06. Pending disposal of the stay application, status-quo obtaining as on today with regard to the entries in the revenue records shall be maintained. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 01-11-2007 Prv