IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CWP No. 13630 of 2011 Date of decision: 01.08.2011 Sunil Kumar and others ........ Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Manoj Makkar, Advocate for the petitioners -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) On February to April, 2011, a service agreement was executed between the petitioners and the Department of Industrial Training Institute, Haryana and the petitioners were appointed Instructors of various subjects in the above said department. The petitioners feel that they shall be replaced by other similarly situated Instructors. Apprehending their termination, they have filed the present writ petition. At present, there is no written order terminating the services of the petitioners nor has any post been advertised afresh. Accordingly, the present writ petition is pre-mature. Dismissed being pre-mature. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 01.08.2011 mohan