^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARHAT BILASPUR (C.G.) M.C.C NQ. _S3 _OF2011 •'SPPLICANT \b^' ^^^^^- f^a^w"^,. ;o»»d-"""c^r (Arising out of M.A. (C.) No. 1606 /2009) lori Lal S/o .Sukh Lal Gond , aged about 21 years, resident of Village Pokhari Dand Naka , Thana Marwahi, Tahasil- Marwahi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ' -& NON-APPLICANT VE^^ ' p^k4>^ ' 1. Adhar SinghS/o(Mahipal)Gond,^ aged about 20 years 2 'Shiv lal S/o Tilak Ram Gond, agedabout47year, Both residents of village Bhadara Tola Naka,Thana and Tahasil Marwahi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited , Division Office, First Floor Rama Tread centre , In Front of Rajiv Plaza , Bus Stand &J^pu](Raipy^CC.G.) :^ : \ :! . _ APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OFM.A.fONo. 1606/2009, " HORI LAL Vs. ADHAR SINGH AND OTHERS " DISMISSED FOR WANT QFPRQSECUTION^QMr26,lQ,2QlQ S ^asiSSSSSk ^ \^€/, '•'StiB.,.;-..^; HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DB: Hon'ble Shri Sunil Kumar Sinha & Hon'ble Shri Radhe Shvam Sharma. JJ. IVI.C.C.No.53/2011 Applscant Vs. Hori Lal, S/o. Sukh Lal Gond, aged about 21 years, resident of Village Pokhari Dand Naka, Thana Marwahi, Tahsil Marwahi, District Bilaspur (CG) Non-applicants 1. Adhar Singh S/o. Mahipat Gond, aged about 20 years, 2. Shiv Lal S/o. Tilak Ram Gond, aged about 47 years, Both residents of village Bhadara Tola Naka, Thana and Tahsit Marwahi, District Bilaspur (CG) 3. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Division Office, First Floor Rama Trade Centre, In Front of Rajeev Plaza, Bus Stand, Bilaspur(CG) Present: Shri Yogendra Chaturvedi, counsel for the applicant. Shri P. Dutta, counsel for respondent No.3. ORAL ORDER (06.09.2011.) Heard. Applicant Hori Lal, has filed this application for restoration of M.A.(C) No. 1606/2009, which was dismissed forwant of prosecution on 26.11.2010, as 4ione appeared on behalf of the applicant on the said date, when the matter was taken up for hearing. 2. On due consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel fo[, the parties and the grounds taken in the restoration application, we ar'e satisfied that the absence of learned counsel for the applicant on'26.11.2010 when M.A. (C) No.1606/2009 was KD M.C.C. No.53/2011 taken up for hearing was based on bonafide grounds and the restoration application deserves to be allowed. 3. Accordingly, M.C.C. No.53/2011 is allowed and M.A.(C) No.1606/2009 is restored to its original number. Bini Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- Radhe Shyam Sharma Judge y