HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRH' PETmON (SI NQ: 153$ OF 2909 PETITIONER Sakha Ram Jurri, aged about 40 years. S/o Shri Phagu Ram Jurri, village Matoli, PD. Pankhajur, Distt. Uttar Bastan Kanker (CG). Versus RESPONDENT$ 1. State Govt. of Chhatt5sgafh, through the Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. Executive Engineer. Public Works Department, Kanker Division, Dist. Kanker (CG). 3. Sub Divisionai Officer, Pubiic Worke Department. Pakhanjore. Dist. Kanker (CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) Singie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Somkant Verma. oounsei for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur. Dy. Advocate Generai for the State. GRAL ORDER (Passed on this 30m day of March, 2009) With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties. the petition is heard fmaiiy. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to contest the matter, at this stage. However, learned counsel prays that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation before the authorities concerned to consider his case in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 3) Shri Thakur,_,learned Dy. Advocate General submits that. in the event, a representation is made by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. on its own merits, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 4) ln View of the foregoing, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 5) Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. ;; Gowri