1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.5274 of 2007. [Krushnarao Baliramji NJaisingpure] Vs. [Mahendra Radhesyam Singhaniya] ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S.C. Bhalerao, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri J. B. Kasat Advocate for respondent. Coram: A. H. JOSHI, J. Dated: 21st January 2008. 1. The petitioner has challenged the decree of eviction passed by the Trial Court, and confirmed by the First Appellate Court. 2. The petitioner has urged two points: (1) that the ground of default is not proved; (2) that the title of Vendor of the plaintiff itself is defective, and therefore, the suit is not maintainable. 2 3. Though these two points are urged, the petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the finding relating to default, recorded by the First Appellate Court in para 17 is perverse or illegal. 4. The finding on issue no.2 as to tenant and landlord relationship is also not shown to be erroneous. This ground is seen to be a chance argument. 5. Petition has no merit and it is dismissed. JUDGE Sbm