IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1537 of 2008 MEGHA LAL VISHWAKARMA & ORS Versus HIRALAL VISHWAKARMA & ORS ----------- 2 12.9.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioners. In view of the fact that the order of injunction refused by the Trial Court has been reversed by the Lower Appellate Court in appeal on appreciation of facts, this Court would not interfere with such findings of the Appellate Court as they are definitely not vitiated by any jurisdictional error. This aspect of the matter with regard to power of the High Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure in a matter relating to injunction refused or granted by the Lower Appellate Court has been well settled in the case of The Managing Director (MIG) Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. & Anr. Vrs. Ajit Prasad Tarway reported in AIR 1973 SC 76. Mr. Singh would then contend that the petitioner no.1 is an old man aged about 90 years and therefore, he definitely has at least one of the last wishes of his life that he may see the end of the partition suit in his life time. Such grievance of the petitioner seems to be genuine and justified in view of the fact the partition suit of the year 2001 has remained pending for almost seven years. Considering the scope of the impugned order as 2 also long pendency of partition suit, this Court would accordingly direct the Court below to ensure that the suit itself is disposed of within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this civil revision application is dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)