IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1051 of 2009 VIJAY KUMAR, Son of Sri Sheoji Singh, Resident of village Nethua, P.S. Marhaura, District Saran at Chapra … Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Member Secretary, Bihar State Pollution Control Board, Patna 3. The Principal Secretary, Mines Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4. The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, District Saran at Chapra 5. The Mines Inspector, Saran at Chapra, District Saran at Chapra 6. Arun Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Ganesh Singh, Resident of village Awari, P.S. Marhaura, District Saran at Chapra … Respondents. ----------- 5. 19.5.2009 Heard the parties. The materials have come in the counter affidavit of private respondent to show that the petitioner has some enmity with this respondent and this public interest litigation may not be guided by public interest alone. In that view of the matter, we do not propose to linger on with this writ petition beyond what we observe hereafter. It is the stand of the private respondent that he is not running any brick kiln with the movable chimney which is forbidden under law. In that view of the matter, we find nothing more to be decided. However, we direct the Pollution Control Board to ensure 2 that respondent no.6 does not run any objectionable brick kiln with movable chimney which is not permissible under law. We would add here in the interest of general public that if the allegation of respondent no.6 is correct that the petitioner or his men are also operating a similar brick kiln with movable chimney in their village or nearby, then the Pollution Control Board must take suitable action against them also to ensure that such objectionable brick kilns do not operate against the public interest and law. The writ petition is disposed of. (Shiva Kirti Singh,ACJ.) (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/