[ 3308 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NOs: 20522 Of 2005 & 19335 of 2006 WRIT PETITION NO: 20522 of 2005 Between: 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary to Government, Agriculture Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner & Director of Agriculture, Saifabad, Hyderabad. .,.PETITIONERS AND P.Giri prasad, S/o. P.Satyanarayana,Aged 31 yrs,Occ: Agricultural Officer, Office of the Project Director, Diskict Water Management Agency, R/o. Bhongir, Nalgonda district. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the Order dt.22- 8-2005 in O.A.No.2186/2005 on the file of hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and quash the same as the same is contrary to law and facts and pass such other order or orders. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2005(\ VPMP. NO: 261 74 0F 20051 Petition unde Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirr:,umstances stated in the affidavit filed n support of the petition, the High court rnay be pleased to Suspend the Order dt.22-8-2OO5 in O.A.No.218612005 pass;r:,d by the Hon,ble Andhra Pradesh Ad ninistrative ribunal, Hyderabad pending dispc,sal of the writ Petition, and pass sr rch other order or orders. Counsel for the Petl tioners:SRl THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Res pondent: SRI SIVA WRIT PETITION NO: 19335 0F 2006 1 . State Of An< hra Pradesh, Rep. by its prl. Secret,lry k) Government, Agriculture De )artment, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissi rner & Director of Agriculture, Saifabad, Hvderabad. .. PETITIONERS AND It/ Pallavi, Ser ior research fellow SSRF), O/o. The Direct:rate of Oil Seeds Research, Raj, :ndranagar, Hyderabad. ...I]ESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia pray,ng that in the circumstances state I in the affidavit filed therewith, the rgh ,Jourt may be pleased to issue a writ of cerfiorari or any other approp riate writ, order or direction, calling for the records relating to the order dt. 2r.-B-2c06 in oA No. 377112006 on the frre of Hon'ble Andhra pradesh Adminrstrative Tribunar, Hyderabad and quas r the same as the same is contrary to rav, and facts and pass such other order or c rders as may be deemed fit and proper ir the circumstances of the case. Between: I I I l.A. NO: 1 OF 2006 (WPMP. NO:243 96 0F 2006) Petition under section '151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dt. 24-8-2006 in oA No. 3721i2006 passed by Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, in the batch of o.A.No. 218712005 pending disposal of the above writ pefition and pass such other or further orders Counsel for the Petitioners:SRl THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel forthe Respondent: NONE AppEARED The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE JRI.I@SI!A]J-!I iON'BLES AND JUSTICE K. TH TEEJ RI I WRIT PDTIT] coMMoNoRDE qr{-{@'r2oqo Ri (Per the Hon'bte Si Justice Abhinand Kumtr tha/ili) When the matter is taken up for hearing' it has been brought to the rotice of this Court by the learnt:d' Advocate General appeari rg for the petitioners that similarI'rit petition i.e., W.P.No'22980 of 2OO5 was allowed bY this ()ottr| uide orders dated, 22 o4.2oog and the present writ petiticn'rs :rre also liable to be allov'ed by following the said order' 2. In view of the above said submission' -his Court is of the considere d view that the order passed in W'F'No'11298O of 2005 dated 22O4'2OO} is squarely applicable to the present cases. By foll< 'wing the said order' the present 'rrit petitions also deserve to be allowed' 3. Acc rrdingly' both the Writ Petitions are allowed ' There shall be no order as to costs' \ t AKS,J & SK,J W.P.Nos.2O522 of 2005 {n 19335 of 20O6 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in these two Writ Petitions, shall stand closed. That Rule Nisi has been made Absolute as above witness the Hon,ble SRl. UJJAL BHUYAN, The Chief Justice on this Monday, the Twenty Sixth day of September, Two Thousand and Twenty Two. sD/- K. KAIAH ASSISTAN STRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI N OFFICER 2 To,t l!e_ P1l Se{:retary to Government, Agriculture Department, Secretariat, State Of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner & Director of Aqriculture. Saifabad. Hvderabad. 3. Two CCs to SRt THE ADVOCATE GENERAL ,High Corirt for the State of Telangana(OUT) 4. One CC to SRI SIVA Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies (Along with the order copy in W.P.No 22980 ol 200b dated 22.04.2009 to present order) EDS GJP 9st5 , I HIGH COU 1T DATE: 2611t912022 I /;-' (:, 1, $TAff 4 o ftg 2t?1 COMMON ORDER wP NO.20 i22 0F 2005 & 19335 0F 2006 ALLOWING OF BOTH WRIT PETITIONIS WITHOU-I COSTS I tonrc o!oL'\,-"