1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)No.10189 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.2 of 2011 1.M.Matchakkalai 2.M.Santhosam 3.M.Sasikumar 4.D.Santhi 5.S.Devadoss .. Petitioners Vs. 1.The Director General of Police, Chennai. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 3.Mrs.Annathasi, Inspector, All Women Police Station, Vadamadurai, Dindigul District. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the third respondent from conducting "Kattapanchayath" in relation to the complaint said to be lodged by the deceased S.Kala and further direct the first and second respondents to take action against third respondent based upon the petitioners' representation dated 11.07.2011. For Petitioners : Mr.J.Pooventhera Rajan For Respondents : Mr.M.Govindan, Special Govt. Pleader O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to forbear the third respondent from conducting "Kattapanchayath" in relation to the complaint said to be lodged by the deceased S.Kala and to direct the first and second respondents to take action against third respondent based upon the petitioners' representation, dated 11.07.2011. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2. Heard Mr.J.Pooventhera Rajan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents. 3. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final hearing. 4. The petitioners are aggrieved by the action taken by the third respondent, consequent to the complaint made by late.Kala. In this regard, the petitioners have made a representation to the second respondent-Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District on 11.07.2011. 5. Considering the limited scope of the relief sought for in this petition, without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the second respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 11.07.2011, on its own merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's claim. 6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AS) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Director General of Police, Chennai. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 3.Mrs.Annathasi, Inspector, All Women Police Station, Vadamadurai, Dindigul District. +1cc to the Special Govt.Pleader, Sr.No. 30924 pm ssk/26.09.2011 /5c -2p/- W.P.(MD)No.10189 of 2011 08.09.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/