: 1 : cwp-4062-10=.sxw USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4062 OF 2010 Sandip Ghadigaonkar .. Petitioner v/s. Snehal Ghadigaonkar .. Respondent ......... Mr. R.T. Lalwani for the petitioner Ms. Martha Butala i/b Vivek Kantawala & Co. for the respondent ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 8th MARCH, 2011 P.C. : 1. The petitioner had filed Exh.102 before the learned Judge of the Family Court No.4, Mumbai for access in Petition No. A-159 of 2007. The learned Judge by his speaking order dated 4th May, 2010 passed an order dated 4th May, 2010 and granted access for the period 10th May, 2010 to 16th May, 2010. 2. Before this Court, learned Counsel Mr. Lalwani pointed out that after the filing of the writ petition, various orders were passed by this Court thereby providing access to the petitioner in regard to the child Aditya. Learned Counsel for the petitioner wanted this Court to go : 2 : cwp-4062-10=.sxw through the entire record and pass appropriate orders. I am not inclined to do so because the impugned order is dated 4th May, 2010. A reading of the order goes to show that the access was only for about 6 days and that too during May vacation. It appears that the access demanded was on a usual basis and for all time to come for various vacations and various days. In my view, it will not be proper for this Court to examine the merits of the impugned order dated 4th May, 2010 and either set aside the order. Confirming the order will be of no use because the access order is granted by the impugned order is for the limited period. In such a situation, it would be convenient to direct the petitioner to make a full fledged application for access for May vacation, Diwali vacation, X-mas vacation as also for such other days for which he would like to have the access, placing his case before the Court with appropriate averments so that once and for all the question of access shall be decided by the Court of competent jurisdiction. Looking to the ensuing May vacation, it will be proper to direct the learned Judge of the Family Court No.4, Mumbai to decide the said application as expeditiously as possible, provided the petitioner files an application before the learned Judge on or before 25th March, 2011. Hence, following order is passed. : 3 : cwp-4062-10=.sxw ORDER (i) This Court has not expressed any views on impugned order dated 4th May, 2010. The petitioner is permitted to file a full fledged application for access in regard to the child Aditya. If the said application is filed on or before 25th March, 2011 in the Family Court No.4 at Bombay, learned Judge of the Family Court shall hear and dispose of the said application on or before 30th April, 2011. Before filing the application in the Family Court on or before 25th March, 2011, the petitioner shall serve copy of the said application at least on or before 22nd March, 2011 so that the parties can complete the pleadings and facilitate the learned Judge to decide the matter. (ii) It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any views on merits of the matter. The petitioner shall place a copy of this order before the learned Judge to enable him to fix his programme. Learned Counsel on both sides have promised this Court that their counter part in the family Court will co-operate the learned Judge. Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. (R.Y.GANOO, J.)