bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1085 OF 2010 IN FEMA APPEAL (L) NO.1 OF 2010 Ashok K. Jogani ..Appellant Vs. The Office of the Special Director of Enforcement ..Respondent Mr.Kedar Dighe with Mr.Vishal Khanavkar for appellant. Mr.M.S.Bhardwaj with Mr.R.A.Rodrigues for respondent - Union of India. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & K.K.TATED,JJ. DATE : 29th April, 2010 P.C. Heard. Perused Notice of Motion. 2. The appellant was pursuing a remedy by way of Writ Petition before this Court to make grievance against interim relief. In the mean while, the final order in the petition was passed. In the result, the remedy of appeal became available to the appellant. In that view of the matter, this Court had refused to exercise writ jurisdiction, however granted leave to file appeal. Consequently, the appellant has preferred this appeal well within 30 days from the date of grant of liberty to file appeal. 3. In the above view of the matter, period during which appellant was prosecuting remedy of writ is liable to be excluded and balance period of delay in filing the present appeal is liable to be condoned. 4. In the result, Notice of Motion is made absolute. Registry is directed to register the appeal. (K.K.TATED,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)