IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5120 OF 2005 Smt.Subhadrabai Sahebrao Bhise..... ...... ......Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Anr...... ...... .....Respondents. Ms.Varsha Palav with Mr.S.P.Thorat, Adv. For the petitioner. Mr.S.K.Chincholikar, AGP for respondent No.1. Mr.D.H.Kumthekar, Adv. For respondent No.2. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 10/8/07 PC: An order passed by Rehabilitation Officer (SRA) holding that the respondent No.2 is in actual possession of the zopadi in question on the relevant date is challenged by filing present writ petition. On the basis of documentary as also oral evidence a finding of fact has been recorded with regard to possession of the respondent No.2. The petitioner so also respondent No.2 claim to be wives of Sahebrao Bhise and thus the dispute. As the Slum Rehabilitation Authority has recorded a finding about respondent No.2 being in possession her name is recorded as the person in occupation of the concerned zopadi. Perused the order. Same does not call for interference in writ jurisdiction. Hence writ petition is summarily dismissed. 10.8.07