IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20197 of 2009 1. MD.RAHMAN 2. MD. SOHRAB Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 01/07/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a protest-cum-complaint case under Sections- 376/34 of I.P.C. Alleging false implication it is submitted that earlier after investigation final report was submitted by the police which came to be accepted by the Court after notice to and hearing the informant. Thereafter, a protest petition was preferred. Cognizance was taken under Sections-376/511 of I.P.C. Aggrieved, the complainant preferred a Revision leading to fresh order of cognizance under Section-376/34 of I.P.C. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.M.F. Bari, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Katihar in Protest-cum- 2 Complaint Case No. C.A. 914 of 2007 filed in connection with Barari P.S. Case No.121 of 2006, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)