IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD SATURDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.9173 OF 2009 AND CRIMINAL M.P. No.9830 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL PETITION No.9173 OF 2009 CRIMINAL PETITION No.9173 OF 2009 Between: Gurrala Pedda Muni Reddy, S/o. Chinna Muni Reddy ……Petitioner – de facto complainant AND The State of A.P., Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad & 12 others .....Respondents AND CRIMINAL M.P. No.9830 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL PETITION No.9173 OF 2009 Between: Gurrala Pedda Muni Reddy, S/o. Chinna Muni Reddy ……Petitioner – de facto complainant AND The State of A.P., Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad & 12 others .....Respondents HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.9173 OF 2009 AND CRIMINAL M.P. No.9830 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL PETITION No.9173 OF 2009 COMMON ORDER: Criminal Petition No.9173 of 2009, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is filed by the de facto complainant Gurrala Pedda Muni Reddy seeking to quash the proceedings in P.R.C. No.24 of 2009 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Allagadda and consequently direct the Magistrate to take cognizance against respondent Nos.2 to 13 in P.R.C. No.24 of 2009 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 324, 326 & 307 red with 149 IPC and 25(1)(B)(b) of Arms Act. 2. Now, Criminal M.P. No.9830 of 2009 is filed by the de facto complainant seeking permission to permit him to amend the prayer in the main petition from the words “to quash” “S.C. No.300 of 2009, on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Allagadda”, instead of P.R.C. No.24 of 2009 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Allagadda, including the preamble and stay petition. 3. Heard. 4. In case, the petitioner desires, he may file a separate petition for stay of the sessions case, as the position would be changed after committal of the case. Hence, the criminal petition is liable to be dismissed. 5. Therefore, the Criminal Petition is dismissed and as a sequel Criminal M.P. No.9830 of 2009 is also dismissed. ____________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J December 5, 2009. NOTE: 1. Dispatch the order within two days. 2. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the charge sheet to the counsel on record. (B/O) PV