1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1351 OF 2005 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.55 OF 2004 Smt.Laxmi Damodar Mayekar. ..Applicant. V/s. The Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.J.G.Shukla for G.H.Shukla for applicant. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE : JUNE 22, 2006. DATE : JUNE 22, 2006. DATE : JUNE 22, 2006. P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard counsel for the applicant. None appears for the respondents. For the reasons mentioned in the application being sufficient cause, application deserves to be allowed in terms or prayer clause (a) and (b). Besides, I am informed that similar prayer for bringing on record heirs and legal representatives of the deceased original appellant is already granted in the main proceedings. Accordingly, this application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) in the interest of justice. 2. Amendment to be carried out within one week from today, failing which main appeal to stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further 2 reference to the court.