IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.7956 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:07.12.2010. Shri Satish Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Harpal Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. ****** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 29.11.2010 by which the learned Trial Court, while dismissing the application has observed that similar application was earlier filed by the petitioner which was dismissed on 21.04.2010 and that order remained unchallenged. He also granted last opportunity to the defendant/petitioner to lead his entire evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has challenged both the parts of the order yet he could not convince the Court with regard to the first part whereby the application for comparison of the handwriting is concerned because similar application was, admittedly, dismissed by the learned Trial Court on 21.04.2010, therefore, the second application on the same cause of action was not maintainable. However, the prayer made that instead of one opportunity, the learned Trial Court should have granted atleast two opportunities is concerned, the same is accepted and the order dated 29.11.2010 is modified with a direction to the learned Trial Court to provide one more opportunity to the defendant/petitioner to lead his entire evidence besides the opportunity already given for 07.12.2010. With this modification, the impugned order is maintained and the revision petition is disposed of. Order dasti. December 07, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod JUDGE