IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 13th day of October, 2006 Crl. Bail Application No. 959 of 2006 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Sushil S/o Faggu Ram R/o Balmiki Basti, Rajiv Nagar, Haridwar. P.S. Kotwali Haridwar, District Haridwar. ……….. Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ………. Opposite Party Arising out of Crime No. 516 of 2006 Under Sections: 363, 366-A, 306, 368 of I.P.C. Police Station: Kotwali Haridwar District: Haridwar. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard, Mr. Subhash Chandra Tyagi, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned A.G.A for the State. Applicant Sushil, who is in jail in connection with crime No. 516 of 2006, relating to offences punishable under Section 363, 366-A, 306, 368 of I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Haridwar, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail. Statement of victim Neha, recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. shows that the victim and her friend Poonam who are said to have been abducted were taken to picnic, where after, they were left free, The co- accused Bobby and Deepak, with similar role, have already been enlarged on bail by this Court. Considering the above facts and circumstances, in the opinion of this Court, it is a fit case for bail. Let the applicant Sushil be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt. 13.10.2006 H.Negi