[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION L.P.A. NO.77 OF 2009 IN W.P.NO.7549 OF 2008 WITH C.A.L.NO.88 OF 2009 IN L.P.A.NO.77 OF 2009 Balkrishna Gopal Telang ..Appellant Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents .... D.B.Sawant for Appellant Ms.M.P.Thakur AGP for Respondent Nos.3 & 4 V.B.Thadani for Respondent No.5 Shardul Singh for Respondent No.6 .... CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : MARCH 20, 2009 DATE : MARCH 20, 2009 DATE : MARCH 20, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred aggrieved by the refusal on the part of the learned Single Judge in granting the interim relief. We have gone through the order. Apart from the preliminary issue as to whether the L.P.A. is maintainable or not, we find that the learned [-2-] Single Judge has not committed any illegality or error in refusing to grant interim order as it was passed on the Undertaking given by the Petitioner. 3. It is now being contended before us that Undertaking was obtained under duress. This cannot be accepted as a ground to interfere with the interim order. We therefore, do not find any merits in this L.P.A. and the same is dismissed. Civil Application is also dismissed. [J.N.PATEL, J.] [J.N.PATEL, J.] [J.N.PATEL, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]