THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No. 26949 OF 1999 Date: 22.07.2010 Between: Smt. S.Aruna ..... PETITIONER AND The Chairman and Joint Collector, A.P.Beverages Corporation Ltd., Karimnagar and 2 others .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following:- THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.26949 OF 1999 O R D E R : This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the award dated 15.10.1992 in I.D.No.56 of 1990 on the file of the Chairman, Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court, Godavarikhani, is arbitrary and illegal. I.D.No.56 of 1990 was filed under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1987 by the petitioner herein claiming that her services with the Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Limited were terminated illegally on 01.08.1989 without giving any notice. It is also alleged that her juniors were retained in service. The management Corporation filed a counter stating that the petitioner was only a daily wage worker (casual labour) and she worked for a total period of 209 days with breaks. It was also pleaded that load in the bottling unit of the respondents at Karimnagar had considerably decreased and during the year 1988- 89 only 28 casual workmen were engaged; similarly for the excise years 1989-90, 1990-91, 1991-92, 29 casual workers were engaged. It was contended that no person, in the category of female workers who was junior to the petitioner was continued in the respondent unit. The petitioner got herself examined as WW.1 and Ex.W.1 attendance card was marked on behalf of the petitioner. On behalf of the management the Assistant Manager was examined as MW.1. On appreciation of the evidence the Tribunal below recorded a finding that the petitioner worked only as an extra casual labour for 138 days in the year 1988 and in the year 1989 she worked for 71 days. Thus, she worked for a total period of 177 days. Accordingly, while holding that the action of the respondents was not illegal, on humanitarian considerations, the management was directed to absorb the petitioner as extra casual labour or in any other capacity whenever suitable work is available. Having heard the learned counsel for both parties and taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any justifiable reason to hold that the finding of fact recorded by the Tribunal below suffered from any patent error of fact or law. Hence, interference by this Court is not warranted. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. ​ ____________ Date: 22.07.2010 G. ROHINI, J Ivd