IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH JANUARY 2007 / 4TH MAGHA 1928 WP(C).No. 1368 of 2007(K) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- MATHUNNI PANICKER, SISUMANGALAM, PUTHENVILA VEEDU, KUNDARA, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM. 2. K.PRASANNA KUMAR, REMANI MANDIRAM, THAZHUTHALA,KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PELADER SRI.M.A.FAYAZ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. ----------------- W.P.(C).NO.1368 of 2007-K ----------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of January, 2007 --------------------------------------- JUDGMENT ---------- The petitioner is aggrieved by the time schedule granted to the second respondent's vehicle operating on the route Kundara Mukkada-Chirakkara Temple granted on 30-11-2005. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the time schedule granted to the second respondent's vehicle, his remedy was to challenge it before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal. A representation filed in the nature of Ext.P2 seeking modification of the time schedule of the second respondent's vehicle is not maintainable and therefore no direction can be issued by this Court to the first respondent to consider such representation. But, the petitioner will be free to move for modification of his own time schedule to redress his grievance. Subject to that right, the Writ Petition is dismissed. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,JUDGE. MS