SBCWP No.5447/2008 Mithu Lal Kumhar Vs. State Bank of India & Anr. 1 SBCWP No.5447/2008 Mithu Lal Kumhar Vs. State Bank of India & Anr. DATE OF ORDER : - 7.1.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.T. Gupta, for the petitioner. Mr. JK Chanda, for the respondents. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner's application for recalling of the plaintiff for the purpose of cross-examination was rejected by the trial court vide impugned order dated 24th July, 2008. The contention of the petitioner is that as per the practice, the bank persons used to come to the defendant for the purpose of collecting the installments or amount against the loan amount. The petitioner-defendant came to know subsequently that some of the amount paid by him have not been entered in the loan account by the plaintiff. To get explanation from the plaintiffs' witness, it is necessary that they be summoned. The trial court rejected the said prayer after observing that the plaintiffs' witnesses SBCWP No.5447/2008 Mithu Lal Kumhar Vs. State Bank of India & Anr. 2 were cross-examined and all the facts were in the knowledge of the defendant before the cross-examination of the witnesses. Therefore, there is no reason to allow this application. I do not find that the court below has committed any error of jurisdiction in rejecting the application in the facts of the case. I do not find any merit in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-