1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 1914 of 2008 (Shri Sanjay Laxmanrao Yeul Vs. Awajisiddha Maharaj Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. and ors.) Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's Orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATE : 21 st October, 2008 Heard Shri S.M. Puranik for the petitioner, Shri Jawade for respondent no.1, Shri Mohta for respondent no.2, and Shri Parihar, the learned A.G.P., for respondent nos. 3 and 4. By this petition, the petitioner impugns the order passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar on 22/4/2008, dismissing the revision filed by the petitioner against the order of issuance of Recovery Certificate against the petitioner. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. No fault can be found with the impugned order dated 22/4/2008 as the petitioner has not complied with the provisions of Section 154 (2A) of the Maharashtra 2 Cooperative Societies Act and had failed to deposit 50% of the recoverable dues. This Court had, by an order dated 24th April, 2008, directed the petitioner to deposit an amount of Rs. 1 lakh with the Bank, within a period of one week from the date of the order. The petitioner was further directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 5 lakhs within a period of six months from the date of the order. The petitioner has not complied with these terms, in the sense, the petitioner has not even deposited an amount of Rs. 1 lakh with the Bank till today, though the petitioner was directed to deposit it within a period of one week from 24th April, 2008. Since there is non-compliance of the provisions of Section 154(2A) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, the Divisional Joint Registrar was justified in dismissing the revision filed by the petitioner solely on that count. For the reasons aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE RMP