IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No.15829 of 2008 Date of decision: 2.12.2011 Harjinder Kaur Saini ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Ms. Natasha Maya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Chahal, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab. Rajan Gupta, J (oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that regarding grievance of the petitioner against Union Territory for payment of LTC, he be allowed to withdraw his prayer with liberty to make appropriate representation. However, issue with regard to recovery is covered by judgment in Budh Ram & others vs. State of Haryana & others 2009 (3) PLR 511. Learned State counsel (on instructions from Mr. Shashi Garg, Law Officer, who is present in court) submits that case of the petitioner as regards recovery, shall be considered by the State in light of Budh Ram's case (supra) and a speaking order shall be passed within two months. In view of statement made by learned State counsel, no further orders are required to be passed. As regards rest of the grievance, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file appropriate representation. Disposed of. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 2.12.2011 'rajpal'