IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2007 / 11TH JYAISHTA 1929 WP(C).No. 33807 of 2006(Y) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ C.S.PRABHUDASAN, (DEPUTY RANGER (UNDER SUSPENSION), KARUVARAKUNDU FOREST STATION, KALIKAVU RANGE, NILAMBUR SOUTH DIVISION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT), CHERUR HOUSE, VI/402 A, ELTHURUTH P.O., THRISSUR, PIN-680 611. BY ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY SMT.N.SANTHA SRI.K.A.BALAN SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FOREST AND WILD LIFE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS (ADMINISTRATION), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS (VIGILANCE), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.NANDAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 33807/2006 Y APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE LETTER NO. 7/05 DT. 22/3/2005. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE LIST OF STORES, TOOLS AND PLANTS OF CHETTIKULAM DEPOT ALONG WITH THE AFORESAID NOTE THE PETITIONER HANDED OVER TO HIS PREDECESSOR. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE GO RT NO. 34/06/F&WLD DT. 12/1/2006. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT IN WPC NO. 2017/2006. EXT.P5. COPY OF THE GO RT NO. 117/06/F&WLD DT. 24/2/2006. EXT.P6. COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT IN WPC NO. 7879/06. EXT.P7. COPY OF THE GO RT NO. 400/06/F&WLD DT. 4/10/2006. EXT.P8. COPY OF THE BILL NO. 2/04-05 DT. 29/3/2005. EXT.P9. COPY OF THE BILL NO. 5/04/05 DT. 30/3/2005. EXT.P10. COPY OF THE LETTER NO. 7/05 DT. 30/03/05. EXT.P11. COPY OF THE LETTER NO. 7/05 DT. 30/3/05. True copy tga K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.33807 OF 2006-Y ----------------------------------------- JUDGMENT The facts of this case are identical to the facts of the case in W.P.(C) No.33884/2006. So, it is ordered that the directions issued in that case will govern this case also. That means, within the time frame given in that judgment, the investigation against the petitioner shall also be endeavoured to be completed and if it cannot be completed, whether the petitioner should be kept under suspension any more, shall be decided by the Government, as directed in that judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment in W.P.(C) No.33884/2006, while producing a copy of this judgment before the Government. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. 1st June, 2007. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. Nm/