IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.46 of 2009 Ravi Shankar Kumar Akela, son of Shri Kameshwar Prasad, resident of village Karapi, P.S. Khizersarai, District- Gaya ………….. Petitioner Versus 1.The State Of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar 2.The Director General of Police, Bihar 3.The Inspector General of Police, Law and Order 4.The D.I.G., Magadh Range, Gaya 5.The District Magistrate, Gaya 6.The Superintendent of Police, Gaya 7.The Superintendent of Police 8.The Officer-in-charge, Khizersarai, Gaya 9.The Officer-in-charge, Delha, P.S. Gaya 10.Jhaman Mahto, son of Jitan Mahto 11.Sanjay Kumar, son of Shri Jhaman Mahto, Both resident of Mohalla Bhaluahin, Kharkhura, P.S. Delha, District- Gaya 12.Manoj Kumar, son of Ram Dei Mahto @ Deo Narayan Mahto 13.Tarkeshwar Prasad, son of Ram Deo Mahto 14.Ram Chandra Prasad, son of Late Dasu Mahto Serial No.12 to 14 are resident of Bataspur, P.S., Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya 15.Rajneesh Kumar Nirala alias Dilip Kumar alias Deepak Kumar, son of Rameshwar Mahto, resident of Laxmibigha, P.S. Agbarpur, District- Nalanda, at present residing at Mohalla Kharkhura Bairagi, P.S. Delha, District- Gaya 16.Abhay Kumar, son of Ra, Briksha Prasad 17.Ajit Kumar, son of Nand Kishore Prasad Serial No.16 and 17 are resident of village Kujapi, P.S. Chandeuti, District- Gaya 18.Sachindra Tiwary, son of Late Ramdahin Tiwary, resident of village- Takia Karapi, P.S. Khizersarai, District- Gaya 19.Suresh Singh, son of Ajit Singh, resident of village Hulasganj, P.S. Hulasganj, District- Jehanabad 20.Lalan Prasad Singh, A.S.I., Posted at Delha Police Station …………. Respondents. ----------- 5. 10/05/2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against possible eviction of the petitioner at the hands of private respondent nos.10 to 20, petitioner has already taken - 2 - legal steps. However, he is being threatened by the respondents, on account of which, he is not able to live in Gaya and pursue his cases filed against them. It is submitted that the petitioner has approached higher police authorities of the District and other higher officers and functionaries of the State. However, he submits that, no body has paid any heed to his grievances. It goes without saying that if the petitioner is being threatened of life at the hands of the respondents and he complains about the same to the police officials, an enquiry has to be made and necessary action has to be taken. Therefore, petitioner is given liberty to file a fresh application before the Superintendent of Police, Gaya giving details of his grievances. If such an application is filed, the Superintendent of Police, Gaya will look into the mater and get it enquired into, if necessary, and take appropriate steps, as may be required in law, in the matter. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. Pradeep/ ( J.N. Singh, J.)