IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1765 of 2010 SRI THAKUR NAVANEET PRIYAJEE @ NAVANEET LALIJEE Versus LOKHENDRA BHAGAT & ANR. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, Advocate ------ 4 01.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears on behalf of opposite party no. 1. I.A. No. 6781/2010 has been filed for condoning the delay of about 7 days in preferring the M.J.C. No. 1765 of 2010. For the reasons mentioned in paragraph nos. 3, and 4 of the interlocutory application, it appears that the petitioner was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring this M.J.C. application within time. In above view of the matter the aforesaid interlocutory application is allowed and the delay in filing of M.J.C. No. 1765 of 2010 is hereby condoned. Now I proceed to consider the M.J.C. No. 1765 of 2010 on its own merit. This application has been filed for restoration of C.R. No. 1959/2007, which stood dismissed for want of prosecution on 16.3.2010. 2 On being satisfied with the sufficiency of reasons mentioned in this application for omission on part of the petitioners, the same is allowed and the Civil Revision No. 1959/2007 is restored to its original file and number. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)