IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.451 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.12.2010 Anil Kumar and another ......Appellant(s) Versus Abdul Hai etc. ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. N.D. Achint, Advocate for the appellant. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral) CM No.1298-C of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. RSA No.451 of 2010 This is defendants' second appeal challenging the judgment and decrees of the Courts below whereby suit of the plaintiff-respondents was decreed holding that after the allotment of land in their favour the respondent-Authorities could not re-allot the suit land in favour of the appellants vide impugned order. A bare perusal of the impugned judgment and decrees would show that the Lower Appellate Court after reappraisal of the evidence has recorded a finding of concurring with the trial Court and holding that under the rules allotment made to the plaintiff-respondents could not be cancelled and the procedure adopted by the respondent-Authorities in cancelling the allotment of the plaintiff-respondents and allotting the land in dispute to the appellants was hasty and mala fide and without adopting the propery procedure. Learned counsel for the appellants could not point out any material evidence on record on the basis of which the aforesaid findings of the courts below could be said to be perverse. RSA No.451 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants has very fairly stated that RSA No.452 of 2010 filed in this Court, which has arisen out of a similar suit, has already been dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated 5.7.2010. In this view of the matter, I find no merit in this appeal. No substantial question of law arises. Dismissed. December 21, 2010 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE