-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN REVIEW PETITION LODGING NO.42 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1333 OF 2004 Sangita U. Mehra...........PETITIONER Versus Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd....RESPONDENTS Petitioner in person present. Ms. S.I.Shah, for the Respondent CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,JJ. DATE : 28th September, 2005 DATE : 28th September, 2005 DATE : 28th September, 2005 P.C.: . The Review Applicant on the last occasion had sought to appear through the Power of Attorney. The Power of Attorney was informed that he cannot address the Court and as such the matter was adjourned to enable the Review Applicant to engage Advocate if any or argue in person. The review applicant is present in Court. She says that she has given Power of Attorney. It is not possible to permit the Power of Attorney to address this Court. Even otherwise the petition was disposed of on the ground that the petitioner has alternate remedy. There is no ground made out for review. Review Petition rejected. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)