1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1723 OF 2010 Arun Subhashchandra Chopra -: versus :- Ashita Arun Chopra Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : APRIL 13, 2010. Heard Shri S.V. Akolkar, learned counsel for petitioner and Shri A.V. Bhide, learned counsel for respondent. The Family Court has after considering the earning capacity of petitioner has sanctioned interim maintenance of Rs. 40,000/- per month to respondent wife. Learned counsel for petitioner has pointed out that in India the annual pay package of petitioner was Rs. 13.6 lakhs and Family Court has found that in U.K. his monthly remuneration is Rs. 3,14,610/-. This according to him is incorrect. He further points out that the petitioner is also required to spend in Pounds and his house rent is 700 Pounds i.e. approximately Rs.50,000/-. He therefore, states that it is not possible for the petitioner to pay Rs. 40,000/- to respondent – wife. 2 With his assistance, I pave perused the pay slip for the period 01.11.2009 to 30.11.2009 and his salary for 30 days in Great Britain Pounds is stated to be £ 7,751. After deductions the net pay has been shown to be £ 2188.05. The Family Court has rightly ignored the deductions towards loan and I do not find anything wrong with its calculation that the monthly income of petitioner in India is accordingly Rs. 3,14,610/-. Shri Akolkar, learned counsel has tried to show that 2188.05 Pounds every month works out to Rs. 1,60,000/- per month only. However, this amount is after deductions which has not been rightly accepted by the Family Court. I, therefore, find that no case is made out warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ Petition is thus dismissed with no order as to cost. JUDGE Rgd.