IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 51 of 2009. [O&M] Date of Decision: 11th May, 2010. Dr. H.C.Gupta Petitioner through Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Anr. Respondents through Mr. K.S.Sidhu, DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner seeks reimbursement of the medical bills pertaining to the expenditure incurred by him on the treatment of his wife. The main grievance of the petitioner is that a sum of Rs.57,219/- was received by him under the Medi-claim policy from the Insurance Company and while submitting the claim of Rs.2,07,412/-, he himself had adjusted and deducted from the total claim, the said amount of Rs.2,64,631/-. The state Government cleared the petitioner's bill for a sum of Rs.1,49,065/- only and while ordering its reimbursement, has again deducted the amount of Rs.57,219/- received by the petitioner from the Insurance Company. The respondents have filed their counter-affidavit explaining as to how the petitioner's claim has been settled as per the government policy. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioner need to be verified from the official record, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to re-consider as to whether or not the petitioner had earlier deducted a sum of Rs. 57,219/- received from the Insurance Company while submitting the claim for medical reimbursement and if that is so, whether the said amount is liable to be reimbursed to him. An appropriate order to this effect shall be passed within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Disposed of. Dasti. May 11, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE