1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION srk(25) CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 617 OF 2009 Bajrang Yashwant Narkhedkar ..Applicant. v/s. Shishir Ratilal Gandhi & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr. Ashok Tajane for Applicant. Mr. Mayank Pandya a/w Ms. Naina Desai i/b Mr. Shashi Jain for Respondent no.1. Mrs. A.A. Mane, A.P.P. for the Respondnet No.10 and 11/State. .... CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 07TH JULY, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard. 2 This Revision Application is filed against the impugned order dated 05.09.2009 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Solapur for demolition of certain part of the building which was in dangerous condition and which posed a danger to the public. The Applicant has filed this Revision Application directly in the High Court. Infact, in view of the provisions of section 397 and particularly the explanation to sub 2 section (1) of section 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code, all Magistrates, whether Executive or Judicial shall be deemed to be inferior to the Sessions Judge and therefore, the order passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate can be challenged in a Revision Application before the Sessions Court under section 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code. As alternative efficacious remedy of Revision before the Sessions Court is available, I refrain from entertaining Revision Application. It will be proper to relegate the Applicant to remedy before the Sessions Court. 3 For the aforesaid reasons, the Revision Application stands rejected. However, the Applicant shall be at liberty to move Revision Application before the Sessions Court challenging the said order. [ J.H. BHATIA, J. ]