'^s^?'^s ^•i^^^^:l{' .tffiSOLfc'BSKCK CL.^2 ^-zr^ ]_ "..Q. fServiGG Matteri IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISQARH1 ~-~'a WRIT PETITION (g1.NO.<^ 2^ /2007. PETITIONER: v^ / Smt.Jyo(iPathak,wifeofDevendFa o ^_..--'',^^-Patha.k, aged ahout 38 years, Asst. "•"" Teacher, Govt. Giris Primary Scliool, Sarkanda, Block Bilha, DistriGt Bilaspur, Chhattisgrah. versus . ^ . Respondents f 1. State pf Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Department Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, ChHa.ttisgarh. 2. The Disfrict Education Officer,Distriet BUaspur, (C.G.) . ' ^ ;: 4 1 ^ 3. Block EduCation Offieer; Block - Bilha, District Bilaspur, (C.G) .^ ^ wJn- P%inON UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THB /^) :.^ 4^?^^C N§WrUTI©NOF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRmN ." NA-TURE'OF.I.iANDAMUS^CERTIQRAEI OR_ANY OTHEE WRIT OF LIKE NATURE The petitidner rii(0st humbly begs EO submit as under :- --^'i^—i^SiSsSEaassaagsiB&ie HKH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARM AT BILASPUR W.P.fSLNQ. 929 of 2007 Petitioner Smt. Jyoti Pathak Versus Reqwndents : Stateof Chhattisgarh flndo'thers SB; Hon'bte Mr. Jwstice Satish K. <<gm"hotri, 3 Present: Mr.AmitX Sharmd.Advocate for thepetitioner. <As, SuiitaJain.PanelLawyerfor'theState/rMpondents. OR&ER Possed on this 20* Day of February, 2007) 1. The petitioner was appointed on 12.07.1995 as Assistant Teacher on fixed pay seale pf Rs. 1200/-. After completion of -two yecr probation.hewasgrantiBdregukirpayscalepfRs. 1200-2040/-. 2. Leamed counsel qipearmg for -the petitioner submits •that the isaie involved in •the case is asto whether. •the petitioner is entitled-to regularpcy scatB w.e.f. the dnte of initial dppointment or otf+er completionOf probation period. 3. The issue involyed, herein ms considered by •the Madhya Pradedi State Administrative Tribunol, Jaba^ur in O.A. No. 2745^9 (AAadhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. A olhers), wherem it was heM Ihat •the simi(arly si'hjoted teadiers are entitled to I'egular pay scak w.e.f. the da'te of rotial appointment. The matter w^ toikm^ to -^ Hon ble Styrenie Court in Special LeavePetitiwi(Ciyil)No. 6892/93. Thesaki petition wcis dtsmiiBifed by .the Mon'bte Supreme Court uphoying th Tribunal to the effect thut 1he Teadiers/Assistcn* Teochers are entitled to r^utar pay scale froin date of initKiloppomtment. 4. Leamed counsel oppearing for 1+ie^^ further subnuts that 1hisCourt,tAilecoiuidermgthesaffleissyeinH^ 0-rtiers vs. S-tate of Chhattisgarh A others {W. P. (^NO. 5191/2006} by order duted 3,10.2CX)6, iias grarrted reguhr pay scolew.e.f.'thedateofinitialqpppintment. 5. lAoOTiedcounset appewmg for the parties jointty submit^^^^t^ case is squcTelycoveredbythededsiQnofthjsCourtmAe^ Mar Prosad Kurre and others vs. Slate of Chhattisgarh A others (Supra). 6. In vi»»of that, •this petjtion is disposed of in •the same terms, No order as to costs. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge Subh<ih