IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellanious No.45270 of 2010 Jakir Khan , s/o- Late Imdad Khan Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 8 03.08.2011 Heard the parties. Petitioner was granted provisional bail by order dated 26.3.2011. Thereafter the matter was listed but could not be heard as learned counsel for the petitioner sought adjournment on different occasions. In terms of order dated 26.3.2011, this matter was required to be considered by this Court for extension of provisional bail or grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of the best efforts put in by the petitioner, the girl, who had eloped with the son of the petitioner, could not be traced. It is contended that in these facts/situation, this Court may confirm the order of provisional bail. Learned counsel for the informant, on the other hand, submits that the daughter of the informant, till date, has not been traced. This Court under order dated 26.3.2011 noticed that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The only allegation was that his son had eloped with the girl. This Court, thus, directs the petitioner to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from today whereafter he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount 2 each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, East Champaran (Motihari) in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. case No. 69 of 2010 subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further condition that one of the bailors shall be his own/close family member. pkj (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)