[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN.NO.1220 OF 2007 Haji Munir Ahmed Mansoori ..Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ... Mrs.Lata B.Patne Advocate for Applicant Mr.K.V.Saste A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : APRIL 17, 2007 DATE : APRIL 17, 2007 DATE : APRIL 17, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is apprehending arrest in respect of complaint lodged by Smt. Kaushyalya Punyakoti Swamy. There is civil dispute. N.C.No.1243 of 2006 has already been lodged at Tardeo Police Station, Mumbai by said Smt.Kaushyalya Swamy under Section 506 of IPC against the applicant. As the police has issued notice under Section 149 of Cr.P.C., the applicant is apprehending arrest. 3. The learned A.P.P. on instructions states that [-2-] in case the police are of the opinion that the custody of the applicant is necessary, 72 hours notice prior to arrest will be given to the applicant in respect of complaint filed by Smt.Kaushyalya Punyakoti Swamy. 4. In view of the above statement, application is disposed of. [Smt. V.K.Tahilramani, J.]