IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 29TH APRIL 2008 / 9TH VAISAKHA 1930 WP(C).No. 13886 of 2008(C) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------ 1. ASHA KRISHNAN, AGED 23 YEARS D/O.K.V.KRISHNAN, "ASHADOM" HOUSING COLONY ROAD, PERINTHALMANNA MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. MITHUN VARGHESE, AGED 24 YEARS S/O.P.G.VARGHESE, "AISWARYA GARDEN" SOUTH MANKUZHI, PULLIKANAKKU P.O., KAYAMKULAM ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-690 537. 3. PRINCE JOSEPH, AGED 24 YEARS S/O.LATE K.J.JOSEPH, KARUPARAMPIL HOUSE OPP. HOUSING BOARD OFFICE, PALA P.O. PALA-686 575, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 4. DEEPAK KURIAKOSE, AGED 24 YEARS S/O.K.D.KURIAKOSE, KUZHIKANDATHIL HOUSE KIZHATHADIYOOR P.O., PALA-686 574 KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 5. VIGY GEORGEKUTTY VAZHAKALAYIL AGED 23 YEARS, D/O.GEORGEKUTTY V.JOHN FLAT 5B, AROMA GARDENS, S.R.M.ROAD LISSIE JUNCTION, COCHIN-682 018. 6. RESHMI. C, AGED 23 YEARS D/O.K.R.CHANDRAMOHANAN PILLAI, "KRISHNENDU" SANADANAM WARD, ALAPPUZHA. 7. SAJITH, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.M.ABDUL ALI NIMMINIYIL HOUSE, NORTH KOZHAKOTTUR AREACODE P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN-673 639 8. MAHESH BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 22 YEARS S/O.V.BALAKRISHNAN, "THE RETREAT", G-291, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI-682 036 9. TEENA JACOB, AGED 23 YEARS D/O.JACOB MATHEW, ALUMPADOM HOUSE WEST COMPARA, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR PIN-680 121 BY ADV. SRI.M.JACOB MURICKAN SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURICKEN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. M.G.UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR, M.G.UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION M.G.UNIVERSITY 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, EDUCATION, GOVT. OF KERALA SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI. T.A. SHAJI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. Siri Jagan, J. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= W. P (C) No. 13886 of 2008 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this, the 29th April, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioners seek revaluation of their answer papers for the MBBS Part II theory examination conducted in December 2007 and January, 2008. Learned standing counsel for the University submits that the University would require at least two months' time to complete the revaluation process. 2. After hearing both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to complete the revaluation process for which the petitioners have applied for, if the application is in order in all respects, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge. Tds/ [True copy] P.S. to Judge.