IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19971 of 2007 YUGESHWAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 10. 02.07.2008 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and the learned Counsel for the opposite parties. The opposite parties were granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 30373 of 2006 noticing the submission of land dispute, pendency of Title Suit and that the firing alleged did not hit anybody. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the bailors in pursuance of the order of anticipatory bail were fake, fictitious and dead persons. On this submission this Court called for a report. The allegations appeared to be correct. However, learned Counsel for the opposite parties submits that after grant of anticipatory bail on 28.7.2006 the bail bonds of the opposite parties were cancelled by the court below on 3.11.2006 for the aforesaid reasons when they were taken into custody and enlarged on bail afresh on 24.11.2006. That the matter with regard to the fake bailors was proceeded in accordance with law under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the entirety of the matter this Court is not persuaded on the submission of the petitioner that cancellation of bail granted by this Court by the court below was not proper so as to justify maintainability of the present application calling for cancellation of their bail again. To that extent this application is dismissed. The aspect of the fake and fictitious bailors shall abide by the final orders in the proceeding under Section 340 Cr.P.C. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)