IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 7587 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: December 08, 2011 Prem Singh .. Petitioner Vs. Pardeep Kumar and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 22.11.2011 (Annexure P1) passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambala whereby evidence of the claimant was closed by order. Learned counsel for the petitioner- claimant states that he wants to examine claimant only. As such, I deem it appropriate to grant some time to the claimant to conclude his evidence and the delay caused in disposal of the case could be compensated by way of costs. As such, the instant petition is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the petitioner- claimant is granted three months time to conclude his entire evidence subject to payment of `500/- as costs. This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondents as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondents may move to this court for recalling this order. December 08, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge