1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5247 OF 2005 Shri Aillak Pannalal Digambar Jain Pathashala, Solapur & Anr. .. Petitioners. V/s. Shikshan Shulka Samiti & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.L.M. Acharya for the petitioners. Mr.S.B. Shetye for respondent No.1. Mr.Vinay Sonpal, AGP for respondent Nos.2 and 3.. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & CORAM : V.C. DAGA & CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2005. DATED : 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2005. DATED : 26TH SEPTEMBER, 2005. P.C. : 1. On the same facts one writ petition was disposed of being (lodging) No.1578 of 2005 by the Division Bench presided by the Hon’ble The Chief Justice vide its order dated July 11, 2005. In view of that, we pass following order : 2. The petition has been filed against the order passed by the Hon’ble Mr.Justice S.D. Pandit (Retd.) by which the Committee has reduced the fees which was fixed from Rs.34,000/- (for accredited course) and Rs.35,000/- (for course not accredited) to Rs.28,300/- for both the courses. 3. This order has admittedly been passed after hearing the petitioner. We are not inclined to 2 interfere with the impugned order, however, we grant liberty to the petitioner to file a comprehensive representation to the committee of Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.D. Pandit (Retd.). We hope and trust that the representation filed by the petitioner would be considered by the committee as expeditiously as possible. 4. The petitioner would be at liberty to raise all the questions before the Committee including the question of refund before the Committee. The petitioner undertakes to appear before the Committee to cut short the delay on 3rd October, 2005. 5. No further directions are necessary in this writ petition. The petition is accordingly disposed of. (V.C. DAGA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)