XI-HG—78 =F € '3"5ET r^iqi^q, ^tl|<H^|(o, [®l<ni<4^< <fW<fT (hNlcb -^ 200 3TT^?T TT^R' ( y^<s<<i^) 37T^T ^F)T f^fW 'cT^TT 3'TT^T 9h^W ^mw^f^T^n^T chi<i(<n<fli *ii*ial ^f fs^ <P»i^i< ^3TfiFT3T?^?T SINGLE BENCH; HON'BLE JUSTICE DHIRENDRA MISHRA W.P. rci ^0.1993/08 (Petition U/A 226 of the Constitution of India) PETITIONER Vs RESPONbENTS Jai Lakshmi Supela Bhilc President Srr aged about 2 Road, Bhilai, 1. State of Fai burga Mahila Sva Sahayata Samooh i, Distt Durg (CG), Through: the t. Anita Devi, W/o Shri Dayanand Saw 7 years, R/o Contractor Cotony, Sirsha >istt Durg (CG) Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Departm4nt of Civil Supplies, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan,f 2. The Colle ^aipur, (CG) :tor (Food), Distt burg (C.G.) 3. The Conljroller Food Drug, Distt burg (C.G.) 09.07.2008 Mr.Vipin Tiwari, Advocate f|or the petitioner. Mr. Shashank Thakur, Panet I.A. No.l,an application f| Lawyer for the respondents-State. )r taking documents on record is allowed and the documents are tak^n on record. By this petition the petitiojner has impugned the order dated 13.8.2007 (Annexure P-3) passed| whereby allotment of the fair pri| herein by respondent No,3 vide ft\ Learned counsel for th^ cancellation of 17 fair price shop| by the respondent No.2-Collector ce shop in favour of the petitioner nnexure P-2 has been cancelled on the ground that the above ord^r has not been passed with the approval of the Collector. petitioner submits that after p, six shops were again allotted to + ^r ^. XI-HC—78 T^T v^i^i<n^, ^ti1<H^<o, f®Kni^^< T r^/ *<1*1<^1 «»*11<t» •^200 W^T ^T'f^TT^ TT^TT 3T?^T 9h*li<^ ^< A 3TT^?T XR^ ( yif^^) ^<nw^Tf?n 3H^T t'l <=r)i^f<n<fli TTTTT^ff ^T f^st <p3i^i< i;»'3tRm37T^T same persons by the Collectoroi|i their representations. He further submits that this petition may b| petitioner to make representa'l allotment of fair price shop av\(\ directed to decide the represe^ with law. Learned counsel for the S^ i$ disposed of with the above direj Accordingly, this petition i| the petitioner shall file a repres^ petition and copy of orders pass^ respondent No.2-Collector (Foc representation is filed within a s disposed of with a liberty to the ion before respondent No.2 for in turn, respondent No.2 may be itation of petitioner in accordance ate has no objection if the petition :tion. 3 disposed of with a direction that ntation along with copy of this writ ^d earlier by this Court before the 'd), bistrict Durg and if such >eriod of 15 days from today, then respondent No.2-Collector shall c^nsider the same within a period of two months' from the date of rec4ipt of the representation. With the above observatior|s, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge 4-