IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1470 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:07.03.2011 Sudesh Kumar Tondon . . .Petitioner Versus Brig. Sarabjit Singh (Retd.) . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Puneet Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Sood, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) After arguing for some time, on instructions from the client, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he does not want to argue the case on merits. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed on merits. However, he prays for time to vacate the demised premises on the ground that the petitioner is in possession since 1963 and it would not be easy for him to find any alternate accommodation for the purpose of business as well as residence. Learned counsel for the respondent has not shown any averseness to the prayer for granting time to the petitioner to vacate the demised premises, however, he submits that some reasonable time be granted to the petitioner. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner is granted six months time to vacate the demised premises, which shall start from the date of passing of this order. He shall vacate the demised premises on 8.8.2011. He shall furnish adequate undertaking before the Rent Controller, Chandigarh within 15 days from today to vacate the demised premises and also pay the rent of the ensuing months on the 7th day of every month, till he retains the possession. It is made clear that if the undertaking is violated, which is to be furnished within 15 days from today, the tenant shall become liable for punishment under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MARCH 07, 2011 JUDGE Vivek