..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2261 OF 2008 Kiran Ramchandra Salunkhe. ..Applicant. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. .... Mr.A.P.Mundargi, Sr.Counsel for the applicant. Mr.H.J.Dedia, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 12th August, 2008. DATED : 12th August, 2008. DATED : 12th August, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant is seeking bail in C.R.No.I-27 of 2007 of Sangli City police Station. The said case is mainly under Section 302 of IPC. 3. The prosecution case is that the wife of accused No.1 had an affair with the deceased Sanjiv. This fact was not liked by accused No.1. Hence accused No.1 with the help of original accused No.2 hired the present applicant to murder Sanjiv. There is recovery of blood stained weapon at the instance of the applicant. There is also ..(2).. recovery of blood stained slipper at his instance. The C.A. report shows that the slipper had human blood stains. As per the C.A. report the knife had blood stains of "B" group. The clothes of deceased also had blood stains of "B" group. In my view, there is sufficient material to connect the applicant with the crime. Hence I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant. Application for bail is rejected. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)