IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DECEMBER 2010 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 33563 of 2010(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- E.V.RAJAN, EDACHIRAPPILLY, AYININADA, MARADU P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SMT.P.K.PRIYA SRI.K.V.SREE VINAYAKAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, MARADU MUNICIPALITY (FORMERLY MARADU GRAMA PANCHAYATH) MARADU P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE MARADU MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MARADU P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. PIN 682304. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD P.O., PIN 682030. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ERNAKULAM, FORT KOCHI P.O., ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-1. R1-2 BY ADV. SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VK P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.33563 of 2010 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of December, 2010 JUDGMENT Ext.P9 order passed by the Secretary of Maradu Grama Panchayat, which has now become a Municipality, directing the petitioner to vacate the thodu poramboke alleged to have been trespassed upon by him is under challenge in this writ petition. When the writ petition came up for hearing today the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that an appeal lies to the Municipal Council and that leaving open the petitioner's contentions and reserving liberty with him to challenge Ext.P9 in such an appeal, this writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. In the light of the aforesaid submission this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn leaving open the petitioner's contentions and reserving liberty with him to challenge Ext.P9 in other appropriate proceedings. P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge. ahg. P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- W.P(C).No.33563 of 2010 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 8th December, 2010