HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Wn‘t Petition (S) No. 947 of 2010 Petitioncr Raj Karan Singh Tamar Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh 85 others WRIT PTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONgl‘ITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Sh’ri K. S. Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shn’ A. V. Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the respondents] State _ o R n E R 10ml) (Passed on this 8th day of March, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to grant of regular pay scale hum the date of his mitlal appointment. He further submits that in View of the order dated 15.1.20 10 (Annexure P/ 3), pa’ssed by this Court in W,P.(S) No. 211[2010 (Lillu Ram Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarhdz, others), the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation in the light of the circular dated 27.12.2008 (Annexure P/ 2) to the concerned authority. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents] State has no objection to the above submission made by learned counsel appealing for the petitioner. In View of the foregoing, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above-stated liberty. It is expected that the concerned authorities would consider and decide the representation, if any, within a period of three weeks h‘om the date of receipt of the representation. No order asto costs. hr; \ Sd/— SASH K. AGNIHOTRI Judge TI