%) PELmosaBvs RESPONDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATBSaKRM AT BILASPUR W. P. (Sl No. 41S»<rf2lW 1. Hom Lal Sahu, Age about 48 year, Astt. Teaoher, Sfo Lafe Shri Keju Ftem Sahu, Oovt. Giris Middle Schooi, Ganod, Block-Arung, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Hem Lal Sahu, Age at>out 54 year, Astt. Teacher, S/o Shn Kanhai^i Lat Sahu, Govt. High Sdwol, Champajhar, Block-Abltanpur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Smt. Santosh Sahu^Age sA»ut51 year, /tett. Teacher, WA> Late Shri Jagdoh Prasad Sahu.Govt. High School, Tama Shmi, Blook- Abhanpur, Distt-Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS 1. State Gort. ef Chhaffisgarti Throi®h Secretary, Tntol Welfare Dqaartment & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Dlstt- Raipur (C.<3.) 2. Cfett. Eduoation Officer, Raipur, DistMct-RaipLB- 3. Blook Education Officer, Distrirt-Raipur (C.G.) Arung/Abhanpur, 4. Treasury, Aceounts & Penston, Raipur, District-Ra^ur (C.G.) WRIT PETtTlQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CQNSTITUTION OF tNDIA Shigte Bench; Hon'ble Mr. Justlce SaUsh K. AgnthoW Present: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Adwcate for the petitionere. Shri Aivind Dubey, Panel lawyer for the respimdents/Stete; 1. 2. 3. 61- (Ftessed on this 16" dsy of July, The question of law invoh?8d herein is asto v«hW»ertte peBttaiers are entitled to wgular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment er ftom the »- dateofcomptetionofprobationpertod. Learned counsel appearing te the p^itioners as well as ftw the respondents/State joirtiy submlt fhat the facts and qusstton of km involved in the present writ petition ane ttie same to Uiat of In W.P. hto. 1463fiQ (Aeman •tain Vs. The Slafe Govermneirt of GhhatUsgartt & am^m^), which was d)^x»edof vide order dated 10.11.2006. In view of the above-stated submlssions made by teamed oounsel aypeamQ for the parti^, the writ petition is dlsposedof in the same temns, sutqetA to verificationofthefacts. No order as to costs. ~—^T-—-—- Satish K.Agnihotri . Judge :