THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.4643 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.129 of 2010 in the Court of IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa, against the respondent, for recovery of certain amount, on the strength of a promissory note said to have been executed by late Sri P.Krishna Reddy. Subsequently, the petitioner filed an application to implead her two daughters as plaintiffs. The application was opposed by the respondent. The trial Court dismissed the I.A., through order, dated 14.09.2010. Hence, this revision. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Admittedly, the suit was filed for recovery of amount, based on a promissory note said to have been executed by the respondent in favour of Sri P.Krishna Reddy. The suit was filed after the death of Krishna Reddy. However, the cause-title of the suit itself is not proper. The description of the plaintiff depicts, as though the suit was filed by Krishna Reddy, and his legal representatives are brought on record, after his death during the pendency of the suit. The petitioner ought to have taken steps to get the cause-title amended. Further, the question of adding other legal representatives would arise, if only the original plaintiff died during the pendency of the suit. The trial Court has taken correct view of the matter and this Court is not inclined to interfere with the same. The C.R.P. is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as costs. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.07.10.2010. GJ