IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 26 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4 OF 2002 VIKAS J. KAMBLE ... Petitioner Versus D. H. KENAUDEKAR AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. J. Godinho,Advocate for the petitioner. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 17th November, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Godinho, learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. According to Mr. Godinho, the respondents have committed contempt by not selecting the petitioner as Upper Division Clerk although he was eligible to be appointed as Upper Division Clerk against the post which was available for Scheduled caste under the roster point at the relevant date. 3. Having heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner, I do not find that this is fit case to initiate contempt proceeding against the respondents. No case is made out for initiating contempt against the respondents. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Needless to mention that the dismissal of this petition, will not come in the way of the petitioner from availing proper remedy available in law. A. P. LAVANDE, J. SMA