IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47658 of 2008 MD. PAPPU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 28/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under Sections- 379, 120B and 414 of I.P.C. Considering the submission that he claims himself to be the garage owner where the vehicles had been given for repairs let the petitioner above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail during the period of investigation, till submission of charge-sheet upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Muzaffarpur sadar P.S. Case No.165 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. Before finally accepting his bail-bonds his antecedents shall be verified. The petitioner shall be required to be physically present so that in the event of a positive report with regard to his antecedents, the present application shall be deemed to have been rejected and in - 2 - which event his application for regular bail shall be considered by the court below appropriately in accordance with law, without being prejudiced by the present order in any manner. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )