CRP 326/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I A ANSARI Heard Mr. N. C. Das, learned Senior counsel, appearing on behalf of the petition er. At the time of motion hearing of this revision, Mr. N. C. Das, learned Senior co unsel, submits that, while passing of the impugned order, dated 28.04.2011, the counsel for the defendants, other than defendant No. 1, was not given any opport unity for filing objection to the prayer of the plaintiff for withdrawal of the suit against defendant No. 1. However, the order, dated 28.04.2011, gives no in dication that the counsel for any of the defendants had sought for time to file objection. In fact, the impugned order does not even indicate that the counsel for any of the defendants in the suit has raised objection to he prayer for with drawal, which the plaintiff had made. This aspect of the case having been point ed out by this Court, Mr. N. C. Das, learned Senior counsel, seeks to withdraw t his revision petition with liberty to file appropriate affidavit, in the learned trial Court, with the present petitioner’s contention that his lawyer had sough t for time to file objection against the prayer for withdrawal of the suit, whic h the plaintiff had filed, but the same had not been mentioned or recorded in th e order, dated 28.04.2011. Considering the matter in the entirety and in the interest of justice, this peti tion is disposed of as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty granted as sough t for by the present petitioner.