CW 5869/10 //1// In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.5869/2010 Smt. Laxmi & Ors. Versus Rent Control Trib & Ors Date of Order ::: 11/05/2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Vigyan Shah, for petitioner Mr. Anil Upman, for respondent-(landlord) Instant petition has been filed assailing order dt.15/04/2010 (Ann.8) whereby application filed by tenant (petitioner) for taking certain documents and summoning two witnesses (Narain Das Gupta & Raman Gupta) for recording their evidence has been rejected. Respondent-2 filed application U/s 9 of Rent Control Act, 2001 seeking eviction in 2005 on the ground that rented shop is required by plaintiff for entry in the premises having come to her possession after partition of ancestral property; to which written statement /reply was filed along with necessary affidavits & documents being relied upon in support whereof. After witnesses of the parties were cross examined, at this stage, application was filed by the petitioner -tenant on 11/08/2009 for taking documents on record and for summoning two additional witnesses (named above) which was rejected vide order dt.15/04/2010 impugned (Ann.8) wherein taking note of material on record, CW 5869/10 //2// learned Tribunal observed that sufficient opportunity was available to the petitioner to file documents and also to summon their witnesses in support of their defence at the time of filing of written statement or immediately thereafter; but the application has been filed after the matter has ripen for hearing in July, 2009. It has also been observed that what has been submitted by petitioner is otherwise not relevant to substantiate the defence. This court has gone through the material on record and finds no manifest error in the order impugned which may call for interference; and does not find any justification to entertain the petition. Consequently, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. No costs. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p2/ 5869CW2010May11DsRnt.doc