-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY TESTAMENTARY AND AND AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTESTATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS MISCELLANEOUS MISCELLANEOUS PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.37 OF 2000 NO.37 OF 2000 NO.37 OF 2000 Neville Minocher Batliwala ...Petitioner v/s Mehroo Noshir Irani and ors. ...Respondents Mr Bipin Shukla i/b M/s S.R.S. Legal for Petitioner. Mr N.R. Modi i/b Mr Rustomji Ginwala for Respondent No.1. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH J. DATE : 23RD JUNE 2006. -2- P.C. :- 1. The learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1, who is one of the beneficiary under the will of which probate has been granted by this Court and for the revocation of which the present petition has ben filed, states that the executors who are named in that will of which probate has been granted have all either expired or resigned. Statement is accepted. In view of this statement, the learned counsel appearing for petitioner states that this petition does not survive for consideration and has become infructuous. Statement is accepted. Petition is disposed off. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. -------------