IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 19TH SEPTEMBER 2008 / 28TH BHADRA 1930 RP.No. 845 of 2008(L) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.16287/2008 Dated 10/07/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER:PETITIONER: ----------------------------------------------------- K.C.NOUSHAD ALI, KARUTTUCHALI HOUSE, VARICKAL, P.O.KARULAI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT: ----------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. A.J.VARGHESE THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------- R.P.No.845/2008 in WP.(C).No.16287/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of September, 2008 ORDER The writ petition was disposed of by judgment dated 20th July 2008 recording the submission of the Govt. Pleader that the respondents are following priority in the matter of settlement of timings and that as at present they were considering permits granted up to 25.3.2008. However, the counsel for the petitioner produced notice for timing conference issued on 1.12.2007, refers to me serial Nos.181,182 and 183 and contends that those are cases where permits were granted on 7.8.2007 and that timing conference is scheduled in November 2008. According to him, going by this standard, for the grant made in his favour on 25.3.2008, timing will not be settled any time in the near future. This apprehension of the learned counsel seems to 2 be genuine, going by the schedule as is seen in Annexure- A1. In view of this I feel that the judgment impugned should be reviewed. Accordingly, the review petition is disposed of directing that, the timing in so far as the petitioner is concerned, should be settled within a time frame. Therefore I direct that the timing conference in respect of the permit granted to the petitioner shall be convened as expeditiously as possible, within 3 months from the date of production of a copy of this order. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE vi. 3