-y 1 )r Lt^ ^) 21"6/ 0^> BEFORE THE STATE AD!VIINISTRATIVE mi ^J.__AT_ .3ABALPUR O.A^T'-T Petitioners A \ly .OF 20DC 1< Sandeep Kumar Sharma, aged about 28 years, Son cf Shri Pauan Kumap Sharma, Patusri, Resident of Hanumen ^ Nandir Gali^ Azad Chcuk, Bralnhapara, Raipur, ^j •'l 2, Kamlehsuar Presad^ Verma ; aged about 26 years^ Son of .Shri Shyamj i^ ^V^r^8? P8tuari Resident of Baloda^ Bazap, Raipur• 3. Saket Bihari chelsk, Son of Shri Hariram Chelak^ aged about 29 years, Patwari^ R/o Behind Mahamaya^ psn Bandhar, Santoshi Nagar RQipur, 4, Kapporlal Kurre aged about 25 years, Son cf Shri SaRialiyaram Kurre, Patwari, Resident of CCl/Mandhar Colony Behind Shiv Plandir, Raipur^ 5, Ganesh Ram Sahu, aged about 28 years, Scn of Shri Duklaha ram 5ahu, Patrsri, Residenfc i r < 2 : 4 9. 10. 11. Chhichole» Tehsil Baloda Baz^r, District Raipur, PramQd Kumar Devangaon, aged about 28 years, Son cFf Shri Ganaram DEbegson, Patuiari, Resident of 36/638, Kankalayi Naka Chcuk, infront of Raja Vastralaya 'Raipur, Bharatlal Jaiswal, aged about 27 years, Son of Shri Rampyre Jaisual, Patwarj, R/o p,0< Sale- via Katr?i, District Raipur» Shiv Kumar Sahu^ Son cf Shri RsmeshuarlaI Sshu, aged sbDufc 28 yeaps, Pafcuari^ Reeident of Plahegaon, Distrlcfc Raipur. Puneet Ram Yadu, aged abcut 23 yesrs^ £on of Shri JaQtetram Yadu, Patwapi Resident of Village 3ahab3hal, Tehsil 88tej§^ Dev^afch District Raipur^ Herendra Yady, a-ged about 2G years, c'on of Shri Bhuuamlal Yadu^ patuari, ^BK Residenfc of near Sarasusti Chouik, Raipur• Lekram Devagaon, aged abQut 27 ye'ars, Son of Shri Lallfel ram Deuagaon, g/ayPatuari, c/o R.P. Gtipta, College yatd, Daganiya P.O.-Sunder > y^m -^ ^ 3 : Uersus No n».a p plic an t s 2. 3. Nagar Raipur» Sfcate of Madhya Pradesh through Secr etary, Revenue Department Vallabh Bhau'^ , najntrelaya, i Bhopal, Collector, Land Recard Branch Raipur, The Sub Divisional Officer, Raipur, District Raipur* 4. \ The Settlement Officer, \Raipur, District Raipur, ^. ^'t^i'c^ eht,-Leli~i-U'\&-L '7^>t^y< (^C^^^^^.-^fc^ i ^s-c-^^^ ^^^^^^:^£^^^^ '~A'^L"" ^ ' 'L%)?^ ' "^^1v^i"L^u^^-'C^J-^i APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 Of THE ADPI INISTRAT I'VE ^•^•^^^ '^w^ •J.^C'^^-V TRIBUNALS ACT 1985 I-HC-22 3^rr'^T f^lt^^Ti^I ^RWHit^? Siaha ^- "3~^r '^FrTOTf, ^Ti1yji<i, iGi<yii^y 3'IT^T ^S^ ^WT^FT'grora?* "*'*'******** ^H[ 200 ^. "fN^sr' -STT^T ^^TT^R: ^rf^T SB: Hoa'Me'Bhri Manin&a Mo 19.03.2010 When fhe matter was petltioners aad the matter was none appeai's for fhe petitioner^ Shri An^ind Dubey, Panel| The petition is tlierefore d| ca^led fbr hearmg, none appeared for fhe ^assed over. Even io. the second round; [Lawyer for the State. Ismissed for waiit of prosecution, <^i<4f<n1iflri 'Rm^Tf ~? 'f^Tst ^^K iT'srf^R^n^r J« Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Jude r^ir^ ^'^