1 caf3834 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3834 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.22802 OF 2009 Pranav Jitesh Harugiri & Anr. ...Applicants vs. Bhimsen Ghadeppa Harugiri & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Haribhau Deshinge i/b Mr.Vijay Killedar for the applicants Mr.T.S.Ingale i/b Mr.Pralhad Paranjape for the respondent nos.1 and 2 CORAM : A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JULY 19, 2011 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2. The reply is taken on record. Delay in preferring the Appeal is of 447 days. 2 The suit filed by the applicants-plaintiffs is partly decreed. 3 The first applicant is a minor. The second applicant is a widow. In paragraph 4 of the application, it is stated that the husband of the second applicant has died and the second applicant has been abandoned by the relatives and members of the society as her deceased husband died due to a peculiar disease. It is stated that meagre amount of Rs.500/- has been granted by the Court by way of 2 caf3834 maintenance and it was not possible for the applicants to incur expenses for preferring an Appeal in this Court. Explanation in paragraph 4 has constitutes sufficient cause. Hence, delay is condoned. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). JUDGE