c^ IN TjIEJiON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.(S) No. ^1&6 Of 2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 4^ . ^< i.^-'Cs^ ^&^ -' !,v- ^^ y Ku. Sova Swini Metya, D/o. of Shri R.N.Metya, aged about 29 years, R/o. M.I.G. 1/916, Amdi Nagar, HUDCO, Bhilai, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) Versus ^i) State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Sechool Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), -<2) Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat, Durg, District Duri (Chhattisgarh) /'.3) District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) :4) Head Master, Government Middle School, Temri, Block Dhamdha, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) WRTT^ETITION UNDER ARTICLE226^0FLTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER •••K ^- •^ S=3 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WR!TPETITJON_[S)NO_^186 QF 2009 PETITIONER Ku. Sova Swini Metya Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. lA Present:- Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms Meera Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri P.P. Sahu, Advocate forthe respondent No.2. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on this 12thdayof.January, 2011) 1. Heard learned counselfor the parties. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submit that this petition has become infructuous in view of the ground raised in para 9.2 of the petition that the petitionet- cannot be transferred up to 21-10-2010. Learned counsel also submit that the petitioner has approached this Court without there being any transfer order. Only option was sought from the petitioner, which she had challenged in this petition. Thus, the petition is not maintainable. 3. Be that as it may, since the submission of the petitioner is that she could nothave been transferred up to 21-10-2010, the said period has already come to an end, thus this petition has become infructuous. 4. In view of foregoing, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. __--—-——— Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge