IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. No.58582-M of 2006 Date of Decision:- 04.05.2007 Sudesh Kumar @ Sita Ram ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.R.S.Hundal, Advocate vs. State of Punjab & ors. ....Respondent(s) through Mr.Rajesh Bhardwaj, DAG, Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.Tarunveer Vashisth, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 7. *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *** SURYA KANT, J. The prayer in this petition is to direct respondent Nos.2 and 3, mainly the Police Authorities to carry out a proper investigation in the F.I.R. lodged by the petitioner. Reply by way of counter-affidavit of Pritpal Singh Thind, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sangrur has been filed on behalf of the respondents, which is taken on record. It is averred in para 5 of the affidavit that the F.I.R. registered on a complaint made by petitioner has been thoroughly investigated and no incriminating material having been found against respondents No.4 to 7, a cancellation report has been presented in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sangrur, which is pending for 25.5.2007. Crl.Misc. No.58582-M of 2006 -2- In the light of the above-stated stand taken by the respondents, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file his protest petition/objections before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sangrur and the same shall be taken into consideration in accordance with law while accepting or rejecting the afore-mentioned report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. May 04, 2007 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE