IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2009 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 4179 of 2009(V) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. JOHN.L.CHACKOLA, S/O.LONA, CHACKOLA, CHEEYARAM, KURIACHIRA, THRISSUR. 2. OUSEPH.L.CHACKOLA, S/O.LONA, CHACKOLA, CHEEYARAM, KURIACHIRA, THRISSUR. 3. IYPE KOSHY, S/O.KOSHY, VALIYA PUTHENPURAYIL VEEDU, CHINNAKKANAL, IDUKKI. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHINNAKANAL. ADDL.R2. THE TAHSILDAR, UDUMBANCHOLA, NEDUMKANDOM. (ADDL.R2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER IN IA NO.3021/2009 DATED 4/3/2009) GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 4179 OF 2009 (V) ==================== Dated this the 4th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioners claimed ownership over the land covered by Exts.P1 and P2. According to the petitioners, the resurvey in respect of the land was completed, but however without notice to them. Coming to know of that, petitioners state that they have filed Exts.P3 and P4 objections before the additional 2nd respondent. It is stated that there was no response to Exts.P3 or P4, but however, the respondents are proceeding to resume possession of the land and it is with that allegation the writ petition is filed. 2. I heard the learned Government Pleader also in this matter. 3. As already noticed, the allegation of the petitioners is that resurvey was conducted without notice to them. It was in view of this that they have filed Exts.P3 and P4 before the additional 2nd respondent. 4. In the circumstances, it is only appropriate that the additional 2nd respondent considers Exts.P3 and P4 objections WPC 4179/09 :2 : with notice to the petitioners and take an appropriate decision in this matter. This shall be done, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp