IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CR No.3758 of 2007 DATE OF DECISION: 31.7.2007 Vikram Singh (Minor) ...Petitioner VERSUS Surinder Kumar etc. ..Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI PRESENT: Mr.P.K.Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Permod Kohli,J. (Oral) This Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 14.5.2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Kurukshetra whereby the evidence of the petitioner has been closed by the Tribunal. The order itself reveals that one witness HC Balbir Singh was summoned by the Tribunal and his summons were received unserved. No reason has been given in the impugned order as to why the evidence of this witness who was duly summoned, has been closed. In view of the nature of controversy involved, without issuing notice to the other side, this petition is disposed of at the motion stage with a direction to the Tribunal to summon HC Balbir Singh whose diet :2: expenses have already been deposited in the Court. The petitioner be also provided one opportunity to produce any other evidence that he may desire to produce. On failure of the petitioner to produce the evidence on the given date, the impugned order shall remain operative, except evidence of Balbir Singh. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 31 .7.2007 MFK