IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA SECOND APPEAL NO. 38 OF 2009 MR. SHRIKANT KESHAV MALIK AND 3 ORS., ... Appellants Versus MRS. GISELA ANDRADE E MARCHON ... Respondent Mr. Neelesh Takker, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. F. E. Noronha, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- U. D. SALVI, J. Date:- 6th January, 2010 P.C. Heard. 2. Perused appeal memo and annexures therewith. 3. The Courts below have unanimously answered the question of jurisdiction raised by the appellants/defendants under Section 56 of the Goa Daman and Diu Buildings(Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968 in favour of the respondent/plaintiff. The trial Court exhaustively dealt with this issue considering pleadings and the evidence in the said case. Nothing survives for debate any further in the present appeal on the said issue. No substantial question of law therefore arises in the present appeal. 4. Appeal is dismissed. One months' time is granted to the appellants to vacate the suit premises. U. D. SALVI, J. vn