IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9335 of 2009 SUSHIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, SON OF SRI KISHUN SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GANGALI, P.S. AKABARPUR, DISTRICT NAWADA, BIHAR----PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DIRECTOR, INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SCHEME DIRECTORATE, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, BIHAR. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NAWADA. 4. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, PAKRIBARAWA, NAWADA.------RESPONDENTS. ----------- 02. 07.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by his transfer effected under order bearing Memo No. 1325 dated 18.6.2009, Annexure-4 on the ground that while effecting such transfer, the contents of the circular letter dated 1.3.2007, Annexure-5 were ignored and he was transferred from the present place of posting without completing three years. It is further contended that while effecting the transfer, the authorities did not notice that the wife of the petitioner is also a Government servant and is serving in Nawada District and ignoring such fact petitioner has been transferred in the District of Saran at Chapra and thereby the personal convenience of the petitioner and his wife was ignored by the authorities. Highlighting the aforesaid fact petitioner has represented before the authorities vide representation dated 22.6.2009 and is contained in Annexure-7 to this application. 3. Let the petitioner first join the transferred post and thereafter communicate the factum of his joining to the Director, I.C.D.S, Social welfare Department, Bihar, Patna before whom his representation dated 22.6.2009, Annexure-7 is pending by filing a supplementary representation and after receipt of the supplementary - 2 - representation intimating the factum of his joining on the transferred post is received by the authorities, the authorities should consider the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law as per the contents of circular letter dated 1.3.2007, Annexure-5 and pass appropriate orders. In the event, authorities are not inclined to allow the representation of the petitioner then they shall be obliged to indicate reasons in their order. The order on the representation be passed as early as possible, in any case within one month of the receipt of the intimation that petitioner has joined the transferred post, if by that time the representation is not already disposed of. 4. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)