IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNAT4K.A AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, i998. ‘ BEFORE THE RON’IJLE MR.JUSTICE H.L. DATTU. / !RIT PETITION NOS.3998—4001/1998. / BETWEEN:— 1. R. Rarnakrishna, s/o M. Ramanna, aged about 27 years, Door No. 76, Sw arnasandra, Mandya—57 1402. 2. Faraaz Afaq, s/o I qbal Ahmed Khan, aged about 27 years, D.No.42, K.S.R.T.C. Block, Bantumantap ‘C’ Layout, Mysore.1.5. 3. K.T .Hanumanthaswany, 8/0 late M.K.Thirnrnaiah, agedabout 29 years, K.P, Doddi, —2— , .Petitioners Maddur Taluk, Mandya District. Pin— 571422. 4 M.R.Man3u, 8/0 M.S.Ramegowda, aged about 26 years, Muttegere, )3asaralu (flobli), Mndya ?aluk and Dist tSri B,V,Nagarathaa,, for petrs,,) AND:— 1. State of Karnataka, by its Commissioner and Secretary, Department of Education, M.S.Bldg, Bangalore.1. 2. The Director of Collegiate Education, Seshadri Road, Bangalore. 1. 3. The Regional Deputy Director of Collegiate Education, Maharani College Hostel, Mysore , 3; —3— 4. Bharathi College, represented by its Principal, Bharathinagar, Mandya Die triot—7i422. • .Respondents. k;J Sri. Udayashankar.,AGA for R—1. to 3) Writ Petitions filed under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India with an affi davit praying to direct the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioners as Lecturers on a permanent basis and to grant all consequential monetary benefits as result of such regularisation by formulating a broad based scheme of categorisation of lecturers and etc., Writ Petitions coming on for prly.hg. this day, the Court made the fo1lowi:— ORDER Petitioners in these writ petitions are staft working in aided private educational insti— tntions. They are before this court interalia seeking directions to the respondents to accord .4. —4— certain service benefits including monetary benefits. In my view, these reliefs cannot be granted by this court in view of the observations made by a Division Bench of this court in W,A.Nos,1833 to 1836/1995 disposed off on 30.5.1998. This court while coidering the issue whether the staff (Teaching and non—teaching) working in educational institutions run by private management can maintain writ petitions to claim financial aid from the State Govt • in the absence of Master and Servant relation and other incidental issues, was pleased to observe that the writ petitions filed by __ teaching and non teaching staff of private educational V.., h’fl 0.. institutions are not maintainable before this court. 0 H° Respectfully following the observations made in the aforesaid decision, thesepetitions are disposed off as not maintainable before this court for the reliefs sought therein. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approoh the proper forum as suggested by this court inShe aforesaid decision. Ordered accordingly. Sd/.-Judge s ns (o • s.) rby: It c.bv ) \\ \ ,i\•’