IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 21901 of 2006 Between: 1 Ch. Arjun S/o Ch. ramulu E.C. No. 0440195 2 P. Nagarju S/o P. Venkatramaiah E.C. No. 0435742, 3 K.V. Ramaiah S/o K.Veeraiah E.C. No. 436653 4 S. Ravi S/o Krishnamurthy E.C. No. 0510990 5 B. Bhadram S/o B. Komraiah E.C. No. 0438415, 6 V.Pullaiah S/o V. Gopaiah E.C. No. 046213, 7 K. Gopal S/o Kamraiah E.C. No. 0438871 8 S. Venkateswarlu S/o S.Rangaiah E.C. No. 0438423 9 S. Srinivas S/o Ebinezar, E.C. No. 0433075 10 K. nageswara Rao S/o K.Veeraiah E.C. No. 0443058, 11 K. Lalu S/o K. Venkateswarlu E.C. No. 0439990 12 N. Narsimha Rao S/o Venkatramaiah E.C. No. 9444652 13 Y. Satyanarayana S/o Sangaiah E.C. No. 0442765 14 Bindalal S/o Bandapancham E.C. No. 0511019, 15 V. Anthony Swamy S/o Joseph E.C. No. 0442812, (All petitioners 1 to 15 are General Mazdoors in JK 5 and 21 Inclines, Singareni Colleries Co. Ltd., Yellandu, Khammam District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 theSingareni Colleries Co. Ltd., Kothagudem, Khammam District rep by General Manager (Personnel) 2 The General Manager (Projects) Singareni Colleries Co. Ltd., Yellandu area, khammam District. 3 The Deputy General Manager, (Personnel), Singareni Colleries Co. Ltd., Yellandu area, Khammam District. ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MS.G.SUDHA Counsel for the Respondents: ---- The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “This Honourable Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction and more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents not confirming the petitioners as security guards and reverting all the petitioners to work as under ground workmen after discharging services for 14 years on surface on the alleged ground that they are not eligible to be posted as security Guards and is illegal and arbitrary in nature and violative of Sections 9A, and 18(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to implement the cadre scheme for these petitioners as security guards as per the relaxation given in the settlement dated 19-7- 1995 on par with other already enjoyed the relaxation and provide all the attendant benefits or in the alternative to accommodate and post them on surface jobs of the mines in any place of the respondent company.” The learned counsel for the petitioners circulated letter dated 29-04-2009 to the Registry, wherein she stated that she was instructed by the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP No.27779 of 2006 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 1st May, 2009 vrn