IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.14569-M of 2010 Date of Decision:7.12.2010 Mitter Bandhu Nanda .... Petitioner Versus Manjit Singh .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raj Karan Singh, Advocate for the respondent. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the respondent states that the present petition is rendered infructuous as the respondent-complainant has already withdrawn the complaint. A copy of order dated 17.9.2010 passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurdaspur, has also been placed on record whereby the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn on the basis of compromise. Accordingly, the present petition is rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such. 7.12.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE