1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Letters Patent Appeal No. 341 of 2008 Digras Vibhagiya and anr v. The PO and ors ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr Z.A. Haq, Adv for petitioners. Mr G.R. Agrawal, Adv for respdt no.3. Coram : D.D. Sinha and A.P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 25th March 2009 1. Heard Mr Z.A. Haq, learned counsel for appellants and Mr G.R. Agrawal, learned counsel for respondent no.3. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the interim order dated 22.9.2008 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No. 3528 of 2007, whereby prayer of grant of interim relief against the order of reinstatement has been refused and interim relief was granted to the extent of back-wages only. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that there is no work-load available in the school run by appellant no.1 Mandal to be allotted to respondent no.3 and in absence thereof, the 2 management will have to pay salary of respondent no.3 every month without work. Learned counsel for appellants has further submitted that order of the Tribunal is not sustainable in view of the facts and circumstances of the case as well as procedure applicable in this regard. 2. Present Letters Patent Appeal is filed against the interim order, whereby learned single Judge refused to grant stay to the order of the Tribunal. Writ Petition is pending for final hearing and, therefore, we do not propose to show indulgence at this stage. However, it will be open for the appellants to move learned single Judge for necessary orders for early hearing of writ petition. With these observations, Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of. 3. In view of aforesaid order, cross-objection filed by respondent no.3 does not survive. Same is accordingly disposed of. Judge. Judge. hsj