IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Civil Review No.21 of 2008. Date of decision :16.05.2008. Narain Chand …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Others. ….Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr.Ajay Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Addl. AG. Dev Darshan Sud, J. (Oral). This review petition has been instituted by the review petitioner who was the appellant in RFA 56 of 2002 on the ground that this Court had failed to take notice of the statement made by Shri J.C.Chauhan, Executive Engineer, Ex.PW-1/N which relief should have been granted to the appellant. It is submitted that there is an error apparent on the face of the record in non-consideration of this evidence. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers are allowed to see the judgment? 2 No ground for review under Order 47 Rule 1 of the code of Civil Procedure is made out by the petitioner. While granting relief, the appellant was awarded interest in particular on the decretal amount from 1.1.1987. In case the decision as urged by the counsel is wrong, the remedy is not by way of review proceedings. This petition is, therefore, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. May 16, 2008. (Dev Darshan Sud) (aks) Judge.