c^ ^^^. IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION (S) N0.^.g'16../2010 PETITIONERS ,..•</. .°/..)/ .*• ovy/ <^.yv ^Mf ^y </v ^ ./ ..^ :y 1. Topchand Sahu Son of Late Baran Lal Sahu, aged about 41 years, working as a Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, Primary School, Bhaisamuda, R/o. Village and Post Kanhera, Block Saja, District Durg (C.G.) ^ 2. Abhishek Tamrakar, Son of late Ramavtar Tamrakar, aged about 26 years, working as a Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, at present Primary School, Nandeli (Dhamdha), R/o. Ward No.9, Tamerpara, Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.), 3." Santosh Kumar Yadav, son of Late Sahas Ram Yadav, aged about 36 years, working as a Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, Priinary School, Deverbija, R/o. Village and Post - Deverbija, Tahsil - Berla, District - Durg (C.G.), VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through -the Principal Secretary, Department of General Adininistration, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2.' The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 3. District Education Offlcer, Durg, District - Durg (C.G.) 4. The Collector, Durg, District - Durg (C.G.) 5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Dhamdha, District - Durg (C.G.), 6.^ Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Saja, District Durg (C.G.), -^^^ f>^v\f-^e^f9 7. Chief Executive Offlcer, Berla, District Durg (C.G.), WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA. IG—78 ^n^r ^r f^fNr ^T^T W^T'^TW a ^2S§ ^W^ff^»N8®h -3"^[ ^|j^|j<r|4, ^til^^Ko, f^TRTy iuf..^....^.f..6./.4-•^200 3TT^T '(T5RiT (^^^T) ^aTW^f^^T^T SB^: Hpn'ble^ShriManmdra IMohan Shrivastava, J 21-06-2010 Mr. R. S. Patel, counsel ft Mrs. Smita Ghai, Panel >r the petitioners. Ljawyer for the State. Heard. filetl The petitioners have are wards ofAssistant Teacherb an application for compassio] given appointment on the p| petitioners submitted that tl|i Assistant Teacher according to! Learned State counsel petitioners may be given representation before the com] be considered on its own merit Having considered and merits of the case, in the opin^ served, if a direction is givenj representation raising theirj respondent authority along witjh within sbc weeks from today, the competent respondent aut]|iority <=M^(<n<flT1 TTTTT^if ^f f^st iF'I^K ^? 3tfOT3TI^?T this petition on the ground that they who died while in service. They moved late appointment and they have been t>st of Shiksha Karmi Grade III. The ^ey are entitled to be appointed as jthe policy. submitted that for the present, the a|i opportunity of filing the detailed ^etent respondent authority, which may ^, in accordance with law. -jvithout expressing any opinion on the |on of this Court, ends ofjustice will be to the petitioners to make a detailed grievances before the competent a copy of the petition and this order, ^nd on such representation being filed, shall decide the same on its own ^M. ^•.®m: •i%.^%», ^ '""11 'lss.^^.HG—78 ^^T^lf^fhF Ttsn w^r s»i^iefr Praveen '3'Sf ^i^Krl-M, ^tli-M^Ko, f®l<'11-(H^< WH^8T%»^ie8% "^ 200 -^?TTraw(^ff^^r) ^RHW^f^T 13TT^?[ ^- z. merits in accordance with law| period of four months from th^ any grievance still remains, available under the law. With the aforesaid obsenl Certified copy as per rulejs. CM^f<n<flt "RP^Tf ^ f^^t <r3i'^i< ^ 3^FT 3T?^T as early as possible preferably within a date of receipt of the representation. If fche petitioners may avail the remedy ation, this petition stands disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge IN