IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.57012 of 2007 SAIRUL SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 13/5/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and perused the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner today. The petitioner renews his prayer for bail from custody in a police case under Section- 302/34 of I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner has been named by the informant when the informant stated that his deceased father who was riding pillion on the motorcycle also disclosed the name of the petitioner. Today the submission is that during trial in his deposition the informant has deposed that he did not identify any of the accused for reasons of darkness. No useful purpose shall now be served by directing continued custody of the petitioner. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner Sairul Sah be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge, Motihari in S.Tr.No.135/2005 arising out of Mehsi P.S. Case No.79/2004. KC ( Navin Sinha,J )