1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.118 OF 2006 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.943 OF 2004 Rakesh Kumar Sharma, .. Applicant. Vs The Union of India and ors. .. Respondents Mr Anil subramaniam, for the applicant. Mrs U.V.Kejariwal, APP for respondent no.5. Mr J.C.Satpute, for respondent nos 1 to 4. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. DATED : 21st MARCH, 2007 DATED : 21st MARCH, 2007 DATED : 21st MARCH, 2007 P.C.: 1. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the first respondent. The petition was dismissed for default on two earlier occasions. It was restored by this Court. This is a third petition. The petition is dismissed for default. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we restore the writ petition to file on the condition that the petitioner pays Rs.1000/- to Kritikar Library, High Court, Mumbai, within two weeks from today. Subject to above, the writ petition no.943 of 2004 is restored to file. The civil application is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI,J.)