IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 5773 of 2010 Date of Decision: 5.5.2010 Onkar Mal ....Petitioner. Versus The Director, Urban Development Department and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to make rules/regulations for the age relaxation of an employee for the fresh advertised posts. On a query being put to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to what is the vested right of the petitioner to claim such a relaxation, he was unable to give any reply much less satisfactory one so that this Court could interfere while exercising its writ jurisdiction under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, there is no merit in the instant writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. May 5, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE