- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. jmi SUIT NO.1098 OF 1990 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.353 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.1098 OF 1990. Dinesh Surender Singh & Anr. ..Plaintiffs. vs. Jagadishsingh Hirdanarayan Singh & Ors. ..Defendants. And Mrs.Sultana Taher Birader & Ors. ..Respondents. .... Mr. V.Y. Sanglikar, i/b. S.G. Vakil, for Plaintiffs. Mr. M.A. Shah, i/b. A.G. Shah, for Defendant Nos.1 & 2. .... CORAM CORAM CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 15TH APRIL, 2009 : 15TH APRIL, 2009 : 15TH APRIL, 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiffs to bring the legal heirs of the deceased defendant no.3 on record. Though all the respondents have been forwarded a copy of the chamber summons about 2 weeks back except for the acknowledgement of the respondent no.2, the learned Advocate for the plaintiffs have not received any acknowledgement in respect of the service upon respondent nos.1, 3 4 & 5. 2. The defendant no.3 expired on 21st June 2008. The plaintiffs were informed about the same on 5th February - 2 - 2009 as can be seen from the Exhibit-A to the affidavit in support of the chamber summons. 3. In view thereof, chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) & (c). The plaintiffs to carry out the amendments on or before 18th April 2009. The plaintiffs to serve an amended copy of the plaint on the defendants within 2 weeks from today. 4. Place the suit for directions on 30th April 2009. [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.] J.] J.]