1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.489/2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO..437/2009 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.490/2009 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.438/2009 Bharat Grahak Vastu Bhandar through Ashok Pandharinath Kulkarni Applicant Vs. Daga Brothers through Jagdish R.Daga Respondent Mr.Rameshwar N.Gire for the Applicant Mr.S.A.Kumbhakoni for Res.no.1 Mr.Y.S.Shinde,APP for State CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J. DATE : 17th SEPTEMBER,2009 P.C. . In both the matters the applicant/original accused is convicted for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act . The concurrent sentence of the subordinate Courts runs against the accused. Today the applicant/accused and the complainant as well as their respective counsel are present before the Court. The original complainant i.e.respondent no.1 files affidavit that the applicant/accused has deposited Rs.51,000/- towards full and final settlement of the claims in both the matters. The learned counsel have submitted that this affidavit be taken on record . 2 Affidavit is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. It is submitted that in view of this affidavit the parties have settled amicably and the matters be disposed of finally. 2] In view of the settlement both the Revision Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) in both the Revision Applications. 3] The bail applications in both the Revision Applications stand disposed of in view of the settlement. 4] The Original complainant/Respondent no.1 is allowed to withdraw the amount of Rs.25,000/- which was deposited in J.M.F.C.Court,Nasik. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)