C-482 No. 268 of 2005 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By way of this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the petitioners have prayed for quashing the impugned order dated 05.03.2005 as well as entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 32 of 2005, State Vs Mahesh & others, under Sections 363, 366, 120-B of I.P.C. pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Tehri Garhwal. Brief facts of the case are that on 18.02.2004, the respondent No.2 lodged the F.I.R. against the petitioners with the allegations that the co-accused – Mahesh (son of the applicants) has abducted Rajeshwari (D/o respondent No. 2. The police after completing the investigation submitted the chargesheet. Thereafter, the learned Magistrate registered the Criminal Case No. 32 of 2005 and took cognizance against the petitioners to face the trail under Sections 363, 366, 120-B of I.P.C. which is under challenge by way of this petition. Heard Sri Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. Having considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners and perusing the documents filed before me, I am of the view that there is no flagrant injustice and abuse of process of court in this case. The points raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners are the disputed question of facts and they can be judged by the trial court where the evidence is yet to be collected. At this stage, I am not supposed to embark upon an enquiry with regard to the reliability of the evidence, which is yet to be adduced before the court during the course of the trial. Any judgment rendered by me would amount to premature judgment where the evidence is still incomplete and hazy. I do not find any merit in this case at this stage. Accordingly, the petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed in limine. Stay order dated 09.05.2005 stands vacated. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioners are the old persons. In case, if the petitioners appear before the court below where the trial is pending, in order to obtain their bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously without causing any unreasonable delay. (B.C.K., J.) 09.01.2008 ASWAL