IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20111 of 2009 JAY KISHORE PANDIT @ JAY KUMAR @ JAI KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.6.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the act alleged completely concerns with one Shobha Paswan either was due to his own will or part of some affairs and if the same was not a love affair then there would be no occasion of petitioner’s participating the same, allegedly taken the victim and Shobha Paswan to bus stand and thereafter returned back. There was no opposition. There was no cry. Shobha Paswan indulged in sexual intercourse may be forcibly. This much also appeared in the statement of the victim girl after return from her maternal grand mother, remained two days with family members, made her statement in court under section 164 Cr.P.C. and the petitioner remained in custody since 18.2.2009. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of - 2 - Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.P.Shukla, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Danapur, Patna in Rani Talab P.S.Case NO. 137 of 2008. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI