.HM3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1780 OF 2006 Sunanda Devendra Dhavare ... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. A.V. Anturkar with Mr.S.B. Deshmukh for Petitioner. Mr. P.M. Mokashi, A.G.P. for R. Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED: AUGUST 22, 2006 DATED: AUGUST 22, 2006 DATED: AUGUST 22, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . In so far as salary for the period from 13th March, 2006 upto the date of the order, has been deposited in this court. That amount be released in favour of the Petitioner on the Petitioner’s producing authenticated copy of this order to the Prothonotary and Senior Master. 2. In so far as salary for the period from 10.5.2005 to 12.3.2006 the Petitioner to make representation to the respondents within three weeks from today. On such representation being made, respondents to dispose of the said not latter than four weeks from that. 3. In so far as issue of transfer is concerned, it is the case of the Petitioner supported by the certificate of Dr. Raghuanth Godbole under whom she is being treated for last several years, that she has undergone six surgeries on the abdomen and she requires further surgery. In these circumstances, 2 the Petitioner prays that her request for transfer to Pune or a place close to Pune where her doctor has his clinic be sympathetically considered. Considering that and as the pleas seems to be based on the requirement for undergoing surgery at the hands of the doctor who is treating her since long, respondents to consider sympathetically and favourably the request of the Petitioner within four weeks from today. . With the above observations, Petition stands disposed of. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)