IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 31ST JANUARY 2011 / 11TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3063 of 2011(G) ----------------------- PETITIONER : --------------------- LISSIE.K.VARGHESE, W/O.JOYMON, VITHAYATHIL HOUSE, AYIROOR KARA, KUNNUKARA VILLAGE, PARAVUR, REPRESENTED BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER OUSEPH, S/O.KUNJU VARKEY KALLOOKKARAN HOUSE, DEVAGIRI, ANAPPARA P.O. BY ADV. SRI.DINESH MATHEW J. MURICKEN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, AYYAMPUZHA VILLAGE OFFICE, AYYAMPUZHA, PIN-683 581. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 3063 of 2011 G ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 31st day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T According to the petitioner, she, along with her husband, has purchased 43.73 Ares of land situated in survey No.426/2 (Re-survey No.154/2/2) of Ayyampuzha village in Aluva Taluk. It is stated that, though application was made for mutation and for acceptance of tax, the same was declined for the reason that the predecessor in interest of the property has certain liabilities to the first respondent. In my view, that cannot be a reason for declining mutation for the reason that the mutation is only for fiscal purposes and if at all there is any liability, which is enforeable against the property, that is not going to be affected by mutation and mutation cannot be denied for that reason. Therefore, it is clarified that if the refusal is for the reason that the predecessor in interest has liabilities to the first respondent, that reason will not be held against the petitioner and the mutation applied for by the W.P.(C) No.3063/2011 : 2 : petitioner will be allowed. 2. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment and writ petition before the second respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge