1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 237 OF 2010 M/s. Goel & Goel ).. Petitioner versus The Union of India and another ).. Respondents Mr. R.B. Raghuvanshi i/b Dave & Co. for the Petitioners. Mr. D.J. Khambata, Additional Solicitor General a/w Mr.Suresh Kumar for Respondent No.1. Mrs. Usha Srivastava i/b Consulta Juris for Respondent No.2. Mr. S.U. Kamdar a/w Mr. G.B. Kedia for Intervenor. CORAM : J.N. PATEL, ACTING C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 3RD MAY 2010 P.C. The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the intervention application i.e. I.A. Nos.23-24 and I.A. Nos. 21-22 which were filed in the Supreme Court by the Petitioner has already been withdrawn. He places on record the copy of the order dated 23rd April 2010 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in I.A. Nos.25-26 of 2010 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10742-10743/ 2007. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the Petition with liberty to seek appropriate relief. It is submitted that the Petitioner has withdrawn the 2 application for intervention as well as tendered unconditional apology to the Court, the show cause notice issued by this Court may kindly be withdrawn and the Petitioner and his Advocate be discharged. 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents submit that the matter is left to the Court. However, he submits that for future the Petitioner and his Counsel deserves to be warned by this Court for taking such liberties. 4. In view of the fact that the Petitioner has withdrawn his intervention application before the Supreme Court for which the Respondents did not object and so also the Petitioner is now withdrawing the Writ Petition, we want to put an end to the matter and we, therefore, recall the show cause notice given to the Petitioner and his Counsel but with a caution and warning that in future the Petitioner as well as his Counsel should not take such liberty in misleading the Court may be out of strategy adopted by him in order to seek relief from the Court. 5. Writ Petition disposed of accordingly. The show cause notice issued to the Petitioner and his Counsel stands withdrawn. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.