IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2036 of 2011 KRISHNA TIWARY SON OF RAM SEWAK TIWARY. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 04.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 302 and 328 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the victim went in the company of the petitioner for the purposes of talk about compromise of the earlier case. Subsequently, the victim was admitted in the hospital. On information of Dhaneshwar Tiwary, the informant along with her sister-in-law (Gotani) went to the hospital, whereas, the victim only conveyed that some body has given him fruit juice to drink. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that neither Dhaneshwar Tiwary nor the sister-in-law of the informant nor the fruit juice vendor 2 have been examined by the I.O., and since, there is litigation from before between the parties, being the neighbours, their name have been dragged in the present case. Considering the fact that informant has himself admitted that the victim did not name anybody, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 201/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)