BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Saturday, the Twenty Ninth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13937 of 2011 1. SELVAM 2. CHINNAGOMATHY 3. PERIYAGURUVAMMAL 4. KALIAMMAL ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.2,4,5 & 6 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE UTHUMALAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. IN CRIME NO.201 OF 2011. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. A.UTHAYAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 506(ii) and 307 IPC in Crime No.201 of 2011 the petitioners are before this Court seeking anticipatory bail 2. According to the case of prosecution, due to some dispute, the first petitioner attacked the de-facto complainant with knife and caused as any as six injuries. The injured was in the hospital on 29.09.2011 to 12.10.2011. 3. When this Court expressed that there are strong grounds against the first petitioner and therefore, he is not entitled for bail, the learned counsel would submit that he does not press this petition in respect of the first petitioner. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as against the first petitioner. 4. Insofar as the other petitioners are concerned, there are no specific overt act against them and therefore, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners 2 to 4 but with conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Accordingly, the petitioners 2 to 4 are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate Sankarankoil, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 2 to 4 shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 am., for a period of eight weeks. The petitioners 2 to 4 shall comply with the condition stipulated under sections 438 Cr.P.C Scrupulously. 6. The petition as against the first petitioner is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- 29/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SANKARANKOIL 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DIST 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, UTHUMALAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. A.UTHAYAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.37215 GH : 01.11.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13937 of 2011 Date :29/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/