IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 659 of 2003 (M/B) Teeka Ram S/o Badri Dutt R/o Village Sakdenaa, Dhunaghat, Tehsil and District Champawat. Through his Power of Attorney Holder Murlidhar Bhatt S/o Mr. Dilaram Bhatt ........... Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Secretary, Deptt. of Forest, Govt. of Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 2. Conservator of Forest, North Circle, Nainital. 3. Divisional Forest Officer, Champawat Forest Division, Champawat. ............ Respondents Mr. Arvind Vashishth, Advocate holding brief of Mr. C.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttaranchal. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon. Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. Arvind Vashishth, Advocate holding brief of Mr. C.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Mr. Arvind Vashishth, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition, now, has become infructuous. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 02.05.2006 02.05.2006 H