t^ ^I^T'^T'f^W 'CTT ^Iit^l ^"Rt^ -3'^r ^i^j<n^ ^ITF?^, 1^nFC[y W«1^T<iR<TI^ '^ 200 3?1^?T °q^^(^f5^i) '?^?^>^^' ^s^t Writ Petitton (Sl No.69/2009 PETITIONER: Versus- RESPONDENTS: 1. 2.1 (WritPetition under Article ^ Sinele Bench: Hon'ble Shri 09-01-2009:- Shri Deepak Gupta, couns Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, The petitioner was appoir^ted order of Annexure P-2 dated 2' School Jamgaon, Block Deobhc|g. posting, however, her appointhient Annexure P-4 dated 4.4.20081 Standing Committee (General Raipur. ^RfepJN 'W-f^ ^ fe^ 1^5^ ^atfpfHW^r Indu Soni, Daughter of Late Bhagwano Soni, age 24 years, Resident of Village Deobhog, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary Panchayat &- Rural Development Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 26 of the Constitution of India) Mishra, J. Dhlrendra |el for the petitioner. ^anel Lawyer for the State. as Shiksha Karmi Grade-II vide '.9.2007 and was posted at Middle c|g. She applied for change of place of was cancelled vide order of in anticipation of approval from JAdministration) of Jila Panchayat, ^TRT^T ^M K^TK^ ; -FS/95—11/2008—1,00,000. t r"l \ § "t f ./' .^ i"vfS^'^' ^-o 'T^T ^jqi^^j^ ^frOT^, l^iray NffiR^TWW^ •^ 200 3(!^T "q^F (1^t^^??) ^y^r^?^}^ WT 3?i?^? ^II^" ^^i^:-^^ afni^ p^tit: Learned counsel for the has already applied for chan^e Standing Committee (General 4 Raipur and her case was alsc^ 15.4.2008 and no decision was Learned counsel for the petitioner may be permitted respondent No.2 for her posting be further directed to decide thj^ period. Learned counsel for the] petitioner files fresh representatiJDn before the respondent No.2 alon^ shall be considered and decidedl of three weeks from the date of rt Heard. From perusal of the ir|ipugi subsequently confirmed by the the cancellation of the appointijnent approval by the Standing Comijnittee Jila Panchayat, Raipur and the I matter. )^titioner submits that the petitioner of place of posting before the 4dministration) of Jila Panchayat, considered in its meeting dated tfcken. ^etitioner further submits that the jto file representation before the <n another school, who, in turn may representation within a specified ^7-i?d4N '^TR^f ^* 1^T^ '^?^R i?3tfiP:?3ff^ State submits that in case the for her posting in another school i^ with copy of this order, the same |by respondent No.2 within a period ^ceipt of the representation. ^ipugned order, which has been pirector Panchayat, it appears that of the petitioner is subject to of General Administration of |Jila Panchayat is still seized of the ^m'^n ^PT^^n^^'<T^ri?w^—FS/95—11/2008—i ,00,000. t 1 -v\ ^ ^ •^/ .•^A:^ '3^ '^Trai^PT, '^TTl^P^, f^TRTy <<W<W WNras •^ 200 3n^T1q?W ('rt^tT) ^?^i^l1^ ^t^ ^T^I ^Rte ^^?^^ft^ ^iii^y In view of the above parties, the instant petition i^ petitioner to file fresh represenj along with copy of this order. Oj the respondent No.2 shall decid^ weeks from the date of receipt of| subiSnission ^PifOTN ^fR^ft "^ fe^ '^Nl?$K ^r5?f^TH^i^i of learned counsel for the disposed of with liberty to the Lation before the respondent No.2 1 such representation being made, the same within a period of three representation. —--—— Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge