$IN§LE %E%€H c4; Wk 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR - C5) * WRIT PETITION No. §Y3LOF 2010. K pETITIONERs /;1. Khushi Ram Dansena, S/ o. Shri Amrit Lal, Caste-Kalar, aged about 35 years, Peon, Govt. Middle School Kolam, Chitvahi, Development, Block— ' Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.) / 2. Banshi Dhar Sahis, S/o. Jagat Ram Sahis, aged about 37 years, Peon, Government Girl—Middle School Teran‘l, Tahsil Gharghoda, District Raigarh (C.G.) Neheru Lal Saral, S/o. Dhoba Ram, aged about 32 years, Peon, Government Girl— Midoue school Tumidih, Block Gharghoda, District Raigarh (C.G.) .. z VERSUS XL RESPONDENTS /:1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) /2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) /3. The Assistant’ Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) [, 4. Block Education Officer, Ghargoca , District Raigarh (C.G.) p 5 Block Education Officer, Tamnar, District Raigarh (C.G.) 6 Block Education Officer, Barmkela, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 0 0 8-10-201 Shn Ramakant Pandey, coun el for the petitioners. Shri Vaibhav Gover‘dhan. PL or the State. Grievance of ti'ie petitioners n the present petition is that though they are entitled for regular pay sc' te after completion of three years of their service but the same has not Counsel for the petitioners lubmits that they have already tiled ' representation (Annexure Pi3) col decided He submits the ends of ju tice woutd serve If the petitioners are Ith liberty to make a fresh detailed permitted to Withdraw this petition representation. He submits that direction may be issued to the respondent No. 3 for deciding their epresentation expeditiously. State counsel has no objec ‘on if the petitioners make any such representation and the same is bei g decided in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petitioners re permitted to withdraw this petition with the liberty as aforesaid. in eventuality of making any such representation by the petitioner wi hin a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this ord the same wouid be decided by the competent authority within a further period of three months. it is made clear that this rt has not expressed any-opinion on ity' concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation in accord nce with law. e r merits of the case. and the auth i J; or. .v i e u