IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 15TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 32292 of 2009(Y) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. JAMALU,S/O.KHADER, ANDIKKARANTAKATH MEENTHERUVU,AZHEEKKAL, PONNANINAGARAM.PO,PONNANI. 2. KUNHAN BAVA,ANDIKKARANTAKATH MEENTHERUVU,AZHEEKKAL,PONNANINAGARAM.PO, PONNANI. BY ADV. MR.S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR,MALAPPURAM. 2. DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, MALAPPURAM. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES, PONNANI. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR,K.RAMESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) NO.32292/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION ISSUED TO THE IST PETITIONER WITH RESPECT TO HIS FISHING VESSELS. P2:- COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER WITH RESPECT TO HIS FISHING VESSELS. P3:- COPY OF THE LETTER NO.F214/07(1) DTD. 6.10.2009 ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT TO 2ND RESPONDENT. P4:- COPY OF THE LETTER NO.F214/07 (2) DTD. 6.10.2009 ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT TO 2ND RESPONDENT. P5:- COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 12.10.2009 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT. P6:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 25.1.2010 BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT SUBMITTED BY THE IST PETITIONER. P7:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 25.1.2010 BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT SUBMTITED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. P8:- COPY OF THE RECEIPTS EVIDENCING THE DISPATCH OF EXT. P6 AND P7 THROUGH THE REGISTERED POST. TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE tss T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.32292/2009-F ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 4th day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners herein are aggrieved by the rejection of the grant of Kerosene permit. The reply given as per Ext.P5 shows that a combined verification was conducted and it was found that the petitioners are not eligible in terms of the guidelines issued in this matter. 2. The second respondent has filed a counter affidavit in support of the order. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have already filed applications, as per Exts.P6 and P7, before the District Collector for reconsideration of the matter and, Ext.P8 is the postal receipt showing the forwarding of the applications. 3. There will be a direction to the District Collector to take a decision on Exts.P6 and P7 with notice to the petitioners within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms