CWP No. 6238 of 1988 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 6238 of 1988 (O&M) Decided on :30-07-2010 The Jind Central Cooperative Bank Ltd., through its Managing Director ....Petitioner VERSUS The Registrar Cooperative Societies, Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr.Ramesh Goyat , Advocate for the petitioner/applicant. Mr.S.S.Dalal, Advocate for the respondent MAHESH GROVER, J CM No. 12008 of 2009 For the reason that because of the mistake of the counsel as also of the office, for which reasons have been sufficiently explained in the application, the same is allowed and the writ petition is restored to its original number. CWP No. 6238 of 1988 Learned counsel for the respondent states that he has since retired from the service and hence nothing survives in the present writ petition. It is also to be noticed that at the time of motion hearing the following order was passed:- “Counsel for the parties agree that in case respondent no.2 furnishes security for the refund of the salary, CWP No. 6238 of 1988 (O&M) 2 the same shall be paid to him and shall be continued to be paid by the 7th of every calendar month without taking any work from him. It is, however, made clear that if at any point of time the petitioner decides to take work from him, then the salary shall be paid without any security. C.M is disposed of accordingly.” Learned counsel for the respondent further states that the petitioner has been extracting work from him. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am of the considered opinion that the writ petition has since been rendered infructuous. In view of the fact that the respondent has since superannuated, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous, however, the petitioner shall be at liberty to make financial adjustments by giving the retiral benefits to the respondent, if any. July 30 , 2010 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge