IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.628 of 2009 1. MUKESH KUMAR SINGH 2. RAKESH KUMAR SINGH 3. RUPESH KUMAR SINGH ALL SONS OF LATE YOGENDRA PRASAD SINGH, R/O MOHALLA- POKHARA, BUBNA COLONY INFRONT OF EASTERN END OF GUDARI BAZAR P.S. AND P.O.-HAZIPUR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI. …………PLAINTIFFS/PETITIONERS. Versus KRISHNA KUMAR BUBNA, S/O LATE RAM BALABH BUBNA, R/O GUDARI BAZAR ROAD, P.O. AND P.S.-HAJIPUR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI. ……………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- 3 24.04.2009 In view of the recent Division Bench judgment reported in 2009 (1) PLJR 329, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this civil revision application with liberty to the petitioners to prefer an appeal before the appropriate appellate court. He submits that the time spent in revision application may be ordered to be condoned. Since the protection of section 14 of the Limitation Act is available to the petitioner in the circumstances of the case, no order for condoning the delay is required to be passed in the revision application more so when the revision application is being withdrawn for prefering an appeal before the 2 competent court. The revision application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)