S!?IQ*R R~^fiE- c^ ^wf- IN THE HLGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BUASPUR. WRIT PETITION (S»No. ^7o6^-OF 2006 PETITIONERS :1) Roshan Lal Sahu , S/o. Shri Samam Ram Sahu, aged about 42 years, Occupation Governinent Servant ^' <f~"^~' (Assistant Teacher at Govt. Priinary '..•i\<r--' ®"/ ^. AC'" :2) :3) / ^ IA A. School Singhangarh Block and Dista-ict Mahasamund) R/o. Singhangarh, Post Raitum, Via Pithora, TahsU and District Mahasamund (C.G.) Chieneshwar Lal Thakur, S/o. Shri Jhanglu Ram Thakur, aged about 45 years, Occupation Govt. Servant (Assistant Teacher at Govt. Middle School, Bemcha, Block and District Mahasainund) R/o. Imlibhatha Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) Smt. Laxmi Dhruw, W/o. Shri Kartik Ram Dhruw, aged about 38 years, Occupation Govt. Servant ( Assistant Teacher at Govt. Prunary School Mongra, Block and District Mahasainund, R/o. Club Para, Mahasainund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^l) State of C.G. through Secretary Department of School Education, DKS Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). / 2) District Education Officer, Dista-ict Mahasamund (C.G.) 3) Block Education Officer, Block Mahasamund District Mahasamund (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF TODIA H!GH CGURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUR SiNGLEBENCH : HON'BLE MR, SATISH K.AGNIHOTR!. J. Petitioners tespondents VR!T PETITfON (S.l N0.7062 OF 200 Roshan La! Sahu and others versus State of Chhattisgarh and othen Present : Mr. Mahfooj A!am, counss! for ths petitioners. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/ respondente. ORDER itfl (Passed on 19'" Day of December, 2006) Learned counse! appearing for the petitioners as also for the Statefrespondents jointiy submlt that the facts and question of law invoived in the present writ petition are squareiy covered by the declsfon of this Court in the case of Yasiw/ant Kumsr Bharadwaj vs. 2. in subsequent cases, i.e., Writ Petition (S.) No.5862 of 2008 (Hemant Kumar Vishwakanna vs. State of Chhattisgarh snif othQFs) and other connected matters, decidec! by this Court on 12-12- 2006, pursuant to She memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by the Secretary, ioard of Secondaiy Education, Bhopa! and the prospectus of Diploma m Education Examination, it was darified that the norrienclature of the 2 Basic Training tnstitute, i.e., B.T.!. has been changed and renamed as Diptoma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Aceordingty, the D.Ed. Certificate holdere are also covered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.5862 of 2006 (Hamant Kumar Wshwakarma vs. State of ChhaWsgafh and •V 3. For fhe aforementioned reasons, the writ petiti'on is dfsposed o* in terms of the decision of this Court in the matter of Yashwant Ki/mar Bharadwaj (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the peUtioner has acquired D.Ed. Certificafe at his own expenses as per fte circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-19% and further wheifter he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge 1 2006 00 MPJR-CG 96 Bablu