IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2009 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 9752 of 2009(L) ------------------------------- PETITIONERS: ---------------- 1. RAVEENDRAN, AGED 38 YEARS, MEENU BHAVANAM, PALLICKAL PANCHAYATH, ADOOR TALUK. 2. BINDU RAVEENDRAN, AGED 28 YEARS, W/O.RAVEENDRAN, MEENU BHAVANAM, PALLICKAL PANCHAYATH, ADOOR TALUK. BY MR.K.MADHUSOODHANAN NAIR, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. PALLICKAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, PALLICKAL P.O., ADOOR TALUK. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADOOR. 3. CHANDRAN RAJAN, PARAYIL VEEDU, PAZHAKALAM, ADOOR TALUK. BY MR. P.N. SANTHOSH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No. 9752 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 26th day of March, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioners submit that they are constructing a house by availing of the benefit of the Grama Panchayat Housing Scheme. It is stated that in terms of the orders, they have to complete the construction before 31/03/2009. It is stated that in the meanwhile, the 3rd respondent had obtained an order of injunction and on the strength of it, he is pressurising the 2nd respondent to block further progress of the work. It is stated that the intention of the 3rd respondent is that in the process, the petitioners will be loosing the second instalment of monetary benefits under the Scheme. According to the petitioners, in view of the above, they have filed Ext.P4 before the 2nd respondent requesting his intervention. No action has been taken on Ext.P4 and therefore, the writ petition has been filed. 2. Taking into account the above grievance, I dispose of the writ petition directing the 2nd respondent to take action on Ext.P4, if the same has been received and is pending. 3. The petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg