HIGH QGURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILAsPUR “mam N9. 5707 of 2007 ?ETETEONERS 1 Aado Ram Bajajare Slo 8111i Agauu Ram Banjaxe Ag€ about 37 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Pm‘maiy School, Bagdwar, Block — Chhuria, Distt. — Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Deepak Dewangan Sio Shri Narad Lal Dewamgan Age about 40 years, Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, Bagdwar, Block - Chhurla, Distt, — Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Radheshyam Sahu S/o Shri BiSheshar Das Sahu Age about 36 years Asstt. Teacher, Govt. Girls: Middie School, Dondibhara, Distt. — Burg (C.G.) 4 Khilawan Ram Sahu S/o Shri Kishun Ram Sahu Age about 37 years, Asstt. £0 Teacher, Govt. Primary School, — Kabirdham Dashrangpur, Distt. Kawardha (C. G.) Versus RE$P$NBENTS 1 State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, School Education Department Mmistry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 District Education Officer Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3 District Educatiozl O£ficer Distt. Durg (CG) {Writ Petiiion under Article 2260f the Conatitmtion of India} Agpearaace: Shri Ajay Dwlvecli, Parlel Lawyer for the State on advance copy. Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioaers. QRAL ORDER {17.99.2007} $UI‘HL .KEJMAR SEMHA, J . Heard on admission. Learned counsel for the peiitioners submits that the gaetitioaers have passed B.’l‘.l, examination on their own expenses, therefore, they are entitled to receive two aclvance increments according to circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999. He also submits that iii many identical matters, / ~ 2 @ W.P.§ S\ N0. 5707/2007 the patih'ons have been allowai 1'11 tarms of th6 order passEd 1'11 the casa of Yashwamt Kumw- Bharadwgg V59 Municigaz Cargarmmm, Bum and another {20G6 {m MPJRCG 96}. He submits that the casa of the petitioners is squarely covered by the said Judgment. This legal position is not dieputed by the leaned counsel for The $tate. However, he submits that the order may be passed 1'11 terms of The sairl judgment, but it shall be subjected to ven'ftcatioa regarding petitioners’ such qualification. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed in tenns of the order passed i1; case of Yashwam Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Commotion; Burg and another {Sapra} subject to verification of the facts as to Whether the petitioners had acquired B.T.I. Examination Certificates on their own expenses as per Circulars dated 24.121998 and 01.03.1999 and further Whether they have been paid two advahce increments or not. The petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs ‘ ‘ t i Sunil Kumar Sinha i sw- vatti