CWP No. 14295 of 2007 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH * * * * * CWP No. 14295 of 2007 Date of decision : November 17, 2008 * * * * * Lalit Mohan ............Petitioner Versus Chandigarh Housing Board ...........Respondent * * * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH * * * * * Present: Mr. Hari Om Attri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anupam Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. * * * * * 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the digest? M.M KUMAR, J. The instant petition has been filed with a prayer for issuance of direction to the Chandigarh Housing Board, Chandigarh to allot the petitioner one dwelling unit under the Housing Scheme, namely, “Two Bedroom Flats Self Financing Housing Scheme-2006”, under the category of physically challenged persons. The admitted facts in the present case are that the petitioner is successful waitlist candidate at Sr. No.1 in the category of physically challenged CWP No. 14295 of 2007 2 persons. It is also conceded position that Sh. Sanath Aggarwal, who was successful in draw of lots but was found ineligible being less than 18 years of age on the cut off date, has filed CWP No.9680 of 2007 in this Court and interim direction restraining the Housing Board from allotting dwelling unit to anyone else was issued on 4.7.2007. However, the aforementioned petition has been dismissed today by a separate order. Mr. Anupam Gupta, learned counsel for Housing Board states that the petitioner shall be allotted a dwelling unit, if he is found otherwise eligible in all other circumstances. Mr. Hari Om Attri, learned counsel for the petitioner has however submitted that the petitioner would be under an obligation to deposit the whole amount in lumpsum instead of installments, on account of allowing of the instant petition. He requests that payment be made by him in easy installments. In that regard he may submit a representation within a period of two weeks under registered AD cover to the respondent and the same shall be decided within two weeks of its receipt. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( M.M KUMAR ) JUDGE November 17, 2008 ( JORA SINGH ) ritu JUDGE