$~51. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 440/2009 AMEET AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit K Naagpal, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP Mr. Mani Karan Sharma for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI O R D E R % 29.07.2016 Crl.M.A. No.11514/2016 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. Crl.M.A. No.11513/2016 Issue notice. Notice is accepted on behalf of the respondents. This application has been filed by the petitioner to seek release of Rs.40 lacs deposited by the petitioner’s wife in terms of the order dated 14.10.2009. The petitioner seeks refund of the said amount in view of the settlement reached between the petitioner and the complainant in mediation on 13.07.2016. Counsel for respondent no.2, on instructions, states that he has no objection to the same. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The registry is directed to release the amount of Rs.40 lacs deposited by the wife of the petitioner on behalf of the petitioner along with accrued interest thereon. The application stands disposed of. Dasti. VIPIN SANGHI, J JULY 29, 2016 sr