IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH * * * * * CWP No.5207 of 2007 Date of decision : October 21, 2008 * * * * * Sunil Kumar ............Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...........Respondents * * * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH * * * * * Present: Mr. S.P Khatri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate for respondent-HUDA. * * * * * 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the digest? M.M KUMAR, J. Additional affidavit of Narender Singh Yadav, HCS, Estate Officer, HUDA, Faridabad has been filed in the Court today. The same is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous as the necessary relief has been granted. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. ( M.M KUMAR ) JUDGE October 21, 2008 ( JORA SINGH ) ritu JUDGE