IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.658 of 2009 RAJA RAM PASWAN, son of Sukh Deo @ Sukho Paswan, resident of village-Rakhot, Makadampur, P.S.Mansurchak, District-Begusarai. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 9.2.2009 Heard Sri Rajesh Ranjan No.1, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case is under Sections 392 and 411 IPC and the petitioner is in custody since 23.12.2006 without being put on test identification parade or as per submissions without anything was recovered from his possession. It was contended that the learned Sessions Judge, Samastipur has made a wrong record of fact by indicating in the operative part of his order that the stolen motorcycle was recovered from the possession of the above named petitioner consequent upon the confession of an accused. The court’s attention was drawn to Annexure-2 which is the forwarding report in respect of Sujit Chandra @ Jhoti which indicates that the motorcycle was recovered from his possession somewhere in the jurisdiction of district, Begusarai. Let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Jai Ganesh Singh, J.M. Ist Class, Dalsinghsarai, Samastipur in Ujiarpur P.S.Case No.92 of 2003. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )