THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU C.C. No. 1379 of 2010 O R D E R: This contempt case is filed complaining willful disobedience on the part of respondents in implementing the orders passed by this Court in WPMP No. 25774 of 2010 in W.P. No. 20298 of 2010 dated 25.8.2010, whereunder it was opined that the petitioner was entitled to be reinstated into service forthwith, however, it was made clear that if the services of the petitioner were not satisfactory or if the work is not available, it was always open for the respondents to take appropriate action, as per law. It appears, respondents have passed orders on 3.9.2010 stating that there is no work available, therefore, petitioner cannot be reinstated into service. Therefore, this contempt case is filed. Now, on 14.12.2010 an order is passed by 2nd respondent-Secretary to say that the order dated 3.9.2010 was to be treated as if the petitioner was reinstated into service from 6.8.2010 and terminated from service on 3.9.2010 for want of vacancies since there was no work available and he has also paid an amount of Rs.5,096/- under Cheque No.639139 dated 14.12.2010, for the period from 6.8.2010 to 2.9.2010. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this is not the compliance as per the spirit of the order passed by this Court, I am of the opinion that there is substantial compliance of the orders passed by this Court. Therefore, there is no need of further adjudication in a case of this nature. The contempt case is liable to be closed and accordingly closed. However, this will not preclude the respondents from considering the case of the petitioner for engaging him whenever and wherever necessary. JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU. Date: 20-12-2010. MVB.