l!'f iX'^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, CHHATTISGARH •^ MISC. APPEAL N0. OF 2007 ^ APPELLANTS/ CLAIMANTS ^A. Smt. Urkittli Pradhan, W/o Adhikari Pradhan, Aged about 49 years. l'. Yudistar Pradhan, S/o Adhikari Pradhan, Aged about 27 years. 3. Sahadeo Pradhan, S/o Adhikari -^ Pradhan, Aged about 17 years (Minor). ' 4. Ku. Shanti Pradhan, D/o Adhikari Pradhan, Aged about 15 years (Minor) 5. Naresh Pradhan, S/o Adhikari Pradhan, Aged about .11 years (Minor) 6. Rajesh Pradhan, S/o Adhikari Pradhan, Aged about 9 years (Miiior) Appellants No.3 to 6 are minors and they' appear through their natural guardian mother Smt. Urkila Pradhan, W/o Adhikari Pradhan. All R/o Rajpur, Thana Sariya, Tehsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh Versus yy (^, RESPONDENTS Smt. Phool Bai Mehar, W/o Jayjay Ram Mehar OWNER 2. Kishore Mehar, S/o Jayjay Ram Mehar. DRIVER 3. Ashok Mehar, S/o Jayjay Ram <- Mehar. Respondents No. 1 to 3 are R/o Village Sariya, Thana Sariya, Jahsil Sarangarh, DistRaigarh. ~.^ New India Insurance Company, Sattigudi Chowk, Branch Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG). MEMO OFMISC, APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT f~ L T-- 11 P -"& T M FU IhN 'e.T A n^/l^ a&io^ siRrs, A. i,\i^/i/^^^jk os v's 5mT. Urkuli Pradhan & others 5mt. Phool Bal .Wehar & others ^^?ei ^A ^f\^ -d <^ \,a ^ maren, e.uii) ^ When The matfer is calted out, none appeared on behalf of the c^Dellaiit, Even in the second call none aDDeared. However, Mr. Dashrath 6upta, Advocate is on behalf of respondent No.4. In vJew of the above, we have no other ootion except to dismiss The aspeal tor non-prosecution. Accordingiy, the appeal is dismissed tor non-prosecution. SA'.'- 1. jud&e Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge