IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9096 of 2010 GEETA SINHA W/O LATE GANGA PRASAD R/O RAILWAY GUMTI NO. 2, MANGAL BAZAR, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTT.- MUNGER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION SONE BHAWAN, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MANAGER, STATE FOOD CORPORATION LTD., MUNGER ----------- 2 21.05.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State and the respondent-Corporation. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon the death of her husband in harness on 24th November, 2001 while working under the office of the respondent no.3, although all the retiral dues have been paid, however the amount of group insurance has been paid on 29th March, 2004 to the tune of Rs. 1447/- only. It is submitted that the aforesaid sum does not represent the correct amount of group insurance. Mr. R.S. Pradhan, learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondent-Corporation submits that the petitioner has approached this Court after inordinate delay and that too the writ application did not mention the relevant facts or any representation stating the details of calculation. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, - 2 - petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 with a copy to the respondent no.3. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and upon consideration the admitted dues found payable could also be paid to the petitioner. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)