IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 6319 of 2008 Between: Saripalli Surpa Raju S/o.Soma Raju Hindu R/Darathippa(V) Mogalthur(M) W.G Dist ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Dist Cooperative Officer W.G Dist Eluru 2 The Divisional Cooperative Officer Bhimavaram W.G Dist 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Narsapur W.G Dist 4 The Jagannadhapuram PACS Jagannadhapuram W.G Dist 5 Indukuri Srinivasa Raju S/o.Krishnam Raju Hindu R/o.Darathippa Mogalthur(M) W.G Dist .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1to 4 in not disqualifying the 5th respondent as Director of the 4th respondent society as he acquired disqualification under Sec.21-A of the A.P Cooperative Societies Act by considering the representation dt 05-3-2008 as illegal arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents 1to 4 to disqualify the 5th respondent as the Director of the 4th respondent society and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.CHIDAMBARAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following : W.P.NO. 6319 OF 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the representation dt. 5.3.2008 made by the petitioner and disqualify the 5th respondent as Director of the 4th respondent-society as he acquired disqualification under Section 21-A of the A.P. Co- operative Societies Act. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Co-operation. According to the petitioner, he is a member of the 4th respondent-Primary Agriculture Co-operative Society and the 5th respondent incurred disqualification and hence the same was brought to the notice of the respondents 1 to 3. According to the petitioner, in view of the said disqualification, the 5th respondent can no more be continued to be a member of the 4th respondent-society under Section 21-A of the A.P. Co-operative Societies Act. The only grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that though a representation was given by him on 5.3.2008, the respondents-authorities have not passed any order so far. As the relief sought for in this writ petition is for consideration of the said representation, this Court is of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of at the stage of admission. Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of in the following lines, If the representation dt. 5.3.2008 was really given by the petitioner and received by the respondents-authorities, the same may be considered and the respondents- authorities may pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The said exercise shall be done only after giving notice to the 5th respondent so that the 5th respondent can ventilate his grievance. ____________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J Dt. 26.3.2008 KR ..... REGISTRARp // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Dist Cooperative Officer W.G Dist Eluru 2 The Divisional Cooperative Officer Bhimavaram W.G Dist 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer Narsapur W.G Dist 4 The Jagannadhapuram PACS Jagannadhapuram W.G Dist 5. 2 CCs to GP for Co-operation 6. 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{BMR}