IN THE HIGH CO0URT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 484 OF 2008 in B.C. Suit st. no. 766 of 2008 Smt. Ophelia w/o Martin Henriques : Appellants v/s The State of Maharashtra : Respondents Shri A.M. Saraogi advocate for appellants Ms. G.P. Mulekar, AGP advocate for respondents Coram : S.J. Vazifdar, J Date : 19.6.2008 P.C. Admit, heard finally. As per the order dt. 8.2.2008 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court in S.C. Suit st.no. 246/2008 the Deputy Collector has to ascertain the eligibility of the appellant for residential premises. It appears that the impugned order rejects the application on the basis that it is made for commercial premises. In the circumstances the impugned order dt. 8.4.2008 is set aside and Deputy Collector is directed to comply with the order dt. 8.4.2008 afresh. It is clarified that there shall be no protection as regards the commercial premises. The A.O.is accordingly disposed of. Status quo shall be maintained in respect of only residential premises. The suit before the Bombay City Civil Court is also accordingly disposed of. The parties shall appear before the competent authority on 30.6.2008 at 11 a.m.in the first instance and thereafter as directed by the competent authority.