-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1728 OF 2005 Shri.Deepak Ramesh Gawade ..Petitioner Vs. Mrs.Jyoti Deepak Gawade ..Respondent .... Mr.Anil Subramaniam for Petitioner Mr.N.R.Bubna for Respondent .... CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. CORAM : B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. DATE : MARCH 23,2005 DATE : MARCH 23,2005 DATE : MARCH 23,2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner-husband. It is evident that the husband had closed his evidence by filing pursis at Exh.40 on 17.9.2004. Thereafter, he filed an application for witness summons at Exh.49 and similar application at Exh.57. The trial Court has rejected the applications for issuing fresh witness summons. The view taken by the trial Court does not call for any interference, more so because, the evidence of the respodent-wife is also closed and the final decision is awaited. This application was filed to delay the proceedings as has been rightly observed by the Court below. 2. The petition is rejected summarily. [ B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. ]