IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2008 / 10TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 26238 of 2008(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ V.RAMACHANDRAN, SINDHU BHAVAN, NETTAYAM, NEDIYARA P.O. BY ADV. SRI.R.ARUN RAJ RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. PATHANAPURAM PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD NO. Q.995, PUNALUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SPECIAL SALE OFFICER, PATHANAPURAM PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD NO. Q.995, PUNALUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/09/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.26238 of 2008-W = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 1st day of September, 2008. JUDGMENT The petitioner has filed this writ petition as if it contains only a request for an instalment facility in connection with the realization of a loan extended by a co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. A reading of Ext.P1 will show that proceedings were initiated under the KSCARD Act. That resulted in sale in favour of the bank, confirmation of sale and what has been done as per Ext.P1 is to notify that if the repayment is made within the time fixed thereby, the property would be made available on settling the entire transactions. Even that date was 30 days from 27-6-2008 which means that the said time limit had worked itself out way back in July, 2008 and on the 1st of September, 2008, today the writ petitioner cannot be heard to ask WP(C)26238/2008 -: 2 :- either for an instalment facility or any other indulgence. The writ petition fails. The same is accordingly dismissed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/020908