1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3964 OF 2008 Bajaj Auto Limited ..Petitioner. Vs. Vishwakalyan Kamgar Sanghatana and another ..Respondents. .... Mr. J.P. Cama, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Khaire and Ms. Esha Taishetye i/b M.S. Bodhanwalla & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Sunil Prabhu for Respondent No.1. Mr. S.K. Chinchlikar, AGP for Respondent No.2. .... CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 29th September, 2008. P.C. : Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has fairly stated before the Court that the impugned order dated 28th March, 2008 continues to hold the field only until 30th September, 2008 and that in the circumstances, it will not be necessary for this Court to go into the correctness of the findings which have been recorded therein. This position is fairly not disputed on behalf of the Respondents. In view of the aforesaid 2 circumstances, it is not necessary for this Court to express any view on the correctness of the impugned order and the disposal of the Petition shall not be construed as the expression of any opinion by the Court on the correctness of the impugned order. The Petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. In the event that any such question arises in the future, all the rights and contentions of the parties are kept open. *****