CL^l^7- msiE B i... ^^^fy IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. S. N0 Lj ^ §0/2010 PETITIONER ^ O.P.SONA, S/o Shri P. Sona, aged about 60 w^/ c^f, '^) .t ^% ^p^^s^ ^^f^ '^^•^^^^w) ^' ^>VI 'K7/^^^ 5/^-../^^^^^c<4- years, R/o Tahsil - Kharsia, Dist - VERSUS ^ ^' RESPONDENTS .^ ^y .r>v^<>y /v/:9^?y>'" .-w" .^'^' <^./ 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Director of Agriculture. D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. 2. Assistant Soil Conservation Officer, Katghora^ District - Korba,(C.G.) 3. Deputy Director Agriculture, Korba, (C.G.). 4. Joint Director of Agriculture., Bilaspur, (C.G.). ^^- -^\ fs/ ^ ^ \IA j ® j sa.^j^ifc^ | WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. _...._J^-A-n-CEnc.^i-Tr-xx— -HC—78 ^n^r ^T f<rii<+ ^sn 3:H^Y sFRfsp' ^ .^ el w*icrir ^»w^ TroT •<ii^i<n^, ynil-H^Ko, f®ldiy^< ^..^.&©..^.:A3..?..0/.^ ^200 3TI^T XT?^ (li?^<i?) ^"^HW^'cT^T^T S.B: HON'BLE JUSTICE MR. PRIT 03-09-2010: Shri Ravi Kumar Bhagat, coi( Smt. Smitha Ghai, Panei La\A|yer Counse! for the petitioner ^ revised pay scaie, which has not| representatlon of the petitioner Is slnce last four years but the same hi At thls stage, counsei for the to withdraw the present petition \| before the competent authority aion the respondents may be directe expeditiousiy in accordance with la^ Learned counsei for the Stat fresh representation before the r| decided In accordance wlth iavv. Accordingly, the petition Is di] aforesaid. in the eventuality of ^ petitioner before the respondents from the respondents to decide th| legai aspect of the case as expedlticj It Is made clear that this C^ merits ofthe case and the authorlty] the appllcation strictiy in accordanc^ 1^prf<^fr;T 'RT^ff "4 fe^ iF^t^K '^'siRRSI^T nsel for the petitloner. for the State/respondents. iubmits that the petitioner is ciaiming been glven to him. He submlts that pending before the respondent No; 2 ^s not been decided. petltloner submlts he may be permitted /ith liberty to file fresh representation g with the copy of this order and in turn d to decide the said representatlon 9 submits that let the petltioner make a sspondents and the same would be smissed as wlthdrawn wlth the liberty as iiing any such representatlon by the aislng a!l his grievance, it is expected 3 same coiisidering ail the factua! and »uslyas posslble. )urt has not expressed aray opinlon on concemed vyould be at llberty to declde vvith !aw. 1 Sd/- —^ pritinker Diwaker Judge