1 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 37 OF 2009 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 37 OF 2009 Dr.Sau.Vaishali Mahaveer Chopda & anr. ... Appellants v/s Sau. Bhimabai Dixiraj Jadhav ... Respondent Mr.M.M.Sathaye for the appellants. None present for the respondent. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 1ST DECEMBER, 2009 P.C.: 1. The appellants are aggrieved by the order dated 20.11.2008 passed by the Trial Court i.e. the Civil Judge, Sr. Divn., Nashik. By this order, the application made by the appellants for a temporary injunction has been rejected. The Trial Court has found that there was no evidence or material on record to believe that the defendant was alienating the suit property to deprive the plaintiffs of their rights. 2. There is no new material before me also to indicate that 2 the respondent is in fact in the process of creating third party rights in respect of the suit property. From November, 2008 there has not been any interim orders in favour of the appellants. In my view, therefore, there is no need to grant any orders at this stage to the appellants. During the course of the trial, which I am informed has commenced, if indeed the appellants find that the respondent is attempting to create third party rights, they may apply for necessary reliefs to the Trial Court which will be considered in accordance with law in view of the changed circumstances. 3. Appeal from order stands dismissed along with the civil application. ..... 3