HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: RNA SP1 TR Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. N0. 1691 OF 2003 SC Petitioner : >.C. Dwivedi,S/o Lallumani Dwivedi, aged about 45 years, Occupation Service, Assistant Development and Extension Omcer, Janpad Panchayat Dantewada, Rio R.E.S. Colony, Bacheh; Distt. South Bastar, Dantewada (CG) Respondents Through its Secretary, Department of Personal And Training, Ministry of Home Adairs, New Delhi 2. State of Chhattisgarh-through Secretaty, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 3. Director Panchayat, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 4. Janpad Panchayat, Dantewada through Chief Executive Ofwer, Janpad Panchayat Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada (CG) Jila Panchayat Dantewada through Chief Executive OiTicer, Jila Panchayat Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada (CG) 6. State of Madhya Pradesh, through Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MR) Versus Union of India Shri Ajay Dwivedi, counsel for the petitioner. Smt. B.K. Maity, learned Counsel for Union of India/respondent No.1. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, learned Panel Lawyer for State/respondents No. 2,3, 4& 5. Shn' S.S. Rajput, learned counsel for respondent No. 6. ORAL ORDER (3rd February, ZDOQ This petition is filed under Article 226 and 227 ofthe Constitution of India impugiing the order dated 9.10.2002 (Annexure P-l) passed by respondent No. 2 whereby the petitioner Who was working as Asstt. Development and Extension Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Dantewada has been allocated to State of Madhya Pradesh. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that a direction be issued to the respondents to consider his representation expeditiously to which the learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. 3. Th6 petition is disposed of with direction to the respondcnts to consider and decide tho reprssentation of the petitioner.in accordance with law within a period of 8 weeks from the date of representation made by the petitioner, if any. No order as to costs. K Satish K.Agnihotri f, ‘ Judge ‘ \ l Sd/— Pdya