1 criapln2522-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2522 OF 2011 Dhondiba Raoji Hazare .. APPLICANT Vs The State of Maha. & Anr. .. RESPONDENTS ... Shri A.K.Gandhi, Adv.for applicant. Shri S.G.Nandedkar,APP for R-State. Shri V.Y.Bhide,Adv.for respondent no.2 ... CORAM : T.V.NALAWADE,J. DATE : 08/07/2011 ORAL ORDER: 1] This application is filed for cancellation of bail granted in favour of the respondent in Crime No.81-11 registered in Sangamner police station, Dist.Ahmednagar for offence punishable u/s 302, 143,147,148,149,307,323, 324,504, 506 r.w. 34 of I.P.C. A.P.P. has made papers of investigation available. Both sides are heard. A.P.P. supported the application. 2 criapln2522-11 2] The application is filed on the ground that when bail was refused to male members of the family of the applicant, she went to the house of complainant Dhondiba and she asked him to withdraw the case. It is contended that she had with her 10-12 persons and she gave threat that she would finish second son of Dhondiba also. After this report police registered N.C. on 6/6/11. It was submitted that due to this incident, bail needs to be cancelled. It was also submitted that she was member of unlawful assembly which murdered the son of complainant. 3] The advocate of respondent no.2 pointed out the portion of the application to the effect that respondent got bail and she started living in the house of her parents which is situated in other village. It was submitted that the respondent was granted bail as she had breast feeding child at the relevant time. Bail is refused to the persons who had used dangerous weapons and who had given fatal blows to the deceased. Bail is granted to husband of this lady also in view of the circumstances of the case. There is dispute over agricultural land. It is thus clear that only to prevent the family of the accused from cultivating their portion, this application is filed. The respondent is aged about 20 years having breast feeding child and so there appears no force in the allegation made against respondent. This Court holds that there are no circumstances due to which the bail needs to be 3 criapln2522-11 cancelled and so the application stands rejected. [T.V.NALAWADE,J.] umg/criapln2522-11