INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. ^^rA Of 2011 PETITIONER: f\^'^ RESPONDENTS Hemant Rathore S/p Lafe ?hn _.^^ 9 Lakhan Lal Rathore^ working on the post of Assistant Veterinary Field Officer, Barpali, Sakti, District Janjgir Chanipa R/o Nandore Khurd , District Janjgir Champa (CG). Versiis 4. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Veterinary Department, Mantralay at D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). ^2. The Du-ector, Veterinaiy Service, Chhattisgarh, Raipur ^3. The Deputy Director, Veterinary Service, Distaict Janjgir Champa (CG). </4. The Collector, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As stated in the cause title above. 2. PARTICULARS OFTHERESPONDENTS: Asstated in the cause title above. ffi ashok PETITIONER RESPQNDENTS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BiLASPUR WRIT PETiTION (S) N0.4428 OF 2011 Hemant Rsthore Versus The State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Shailendra Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER<ORAD (Passed on this 08h day of August, 2011) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, working as Assistant Veterinary Field OfRcer at Veterinary Hospital, Barpalikala, Sakti, has been transferredto Veterinary Hospital, Balaud, vide order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P-1) stating it to be on his own expenses. In fact, the petitioner never made any application for transfer from his present place of posting. Shri Dubey, further submits that the impugned order of transfer has been passed by an incompetent officer. Thus, thesame is bad in law. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State respondents submits that, if it is so, appropriate order shail be passed for correcting the defects in the impugned order,as pointed out by the petitioner. Till then, the impugned order dated 15.07.2011 (Annexure P-1) shail not be given effect to in respect of the petitioner. 3. In view of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, npthingsurviYes for adjudication inthis matter. 4. Accordingiy, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- • Satish K. Agnihotri Judge aA.