“W 1N T1“h: L; i ; L ’ Illlll!lmlmllllllllllllllllln ( bVHuli£mh M/ i9 )o 1 ‘3 Ci Mi50.ztition P R0. rirmul Chandla’Jain g 4D ye *3, son of JhLJ Aalldgh uunoLa uln, — Ieslaent o: hlr mct1 h1ne naIJnmmgqon. / Petiiioner : —Versus- l. state oi MaOHya P;ace brough I% , min'Lalne3durces u§partmeni LoveLnmsnt OL maehya P uh uhOyul Eggpqggehts: Qollector, £¢3hancga0n. mlnln‘ UiLLceL, bu no : ectol, beologic l swivey & Mining, Madhyé yLa lialpU/r. Smi meetg Jlnoh, Th9n ala 1v: hsgemb1y (1A h) L on chya aruuzh cesh, bLstrict udJuuu J a ' a k h u a $ ‘ ‘ l \ PETITIONER HIGH COURT 70F CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 139 OF 1993 V Nirmal Chandra Jain Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & Qthers (Wnt Petmon under Artlcie 226/227 of the Constitution of Indm) Single Bench Hon bie Shrl $atlsh K Agmhotn. Present .- . Ms Monsha bhhatn Advocate for 3h" Yogesh Pandey. r Advocate for the petltioner v Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer for the State. RESPONDENTS ORDER (GRAD (Passed on thus 13‘“ day of Jury, 201 1) ‘ Learned counse! appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that the petition has become infructuous Learned counsei appearing for other srde has no obiectlon it is ordered as prayed for. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as ithan. wdrw