1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1300 OF 2010 Shakuntala Sudam Bhosale .. Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Ms.Tejasweetai Kadam i/b Shri Rahul S.Kate for the applicant. Smt.G.P.Mulekar APP for the State. Shri R.B.Raghuwanshi i/b Ms.Rutuja Ambekar for respondent nos.2 and 3. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J. DATED : MARCH 4, 2011. PC: 1. This application is filed for cancellation of bail granted to accused nos.2 and 3 in Crime No.175 of 2009 registered with Lonavala City police station for offence under section 304B read with section 34 of IPC by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Pune on 25.1.2011. 2. The deceased – Poonam, was daughter of the complainant, who has filed this application. She was married to accused no.1 – Mohan Kadam on 26.5.2009. After marriage, she started residing at Lonavala. On 17.12.2009 she committed suicide by hanging herself. The complainant lodged the report contending that she was harassed by the husband, mother-in-law and sister- S 2 in-law to pressurise her to bring an amount of Rs.50,000/- from parents. From statement of neighbour namely Kalpana Shah it appears that on 17.12.2009 at about 1 pm Poonam told her husband that she did not want to live in the house and wanted to go back to her mother’s place. At that time her sister-in-law Deepali, who is respondent no.3 came there and said that she herself would commit suicide as whole quarrel was taking place because of her and Deepali kicked Poonam. After that Poonam went to her bedroom, closed it from inside and committed suicide by hanging. 3. Taking into consideration the material on record the Sessions Court granted bail to respondent nos.2 and 3. Respondent no.2 is mother-in-law of the deceased and she is aged about 50 years. Respondent no.3 is unmarried sister-in-law of the deceased. Learned counsel for the applicant states that even husband of Deepali was granted bail but so far that order has not been challenged. As bail was granted mainly on the ground that respondent nos.2 and 3 are ladies, I do not see any valid reason for cancellation of bail. 3. Therefore, the application stands rejected. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)