-^T ^uo^ 003 ?N THE H?GH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PETITIONER (CHHATISGARHj W. R N0. 2& l^ OF 2003 • BiiiiilB Be Dr, S. K. Bhargava, S/o Late P. N. Bhargava, aged about 42 years, Occupation - Service, Presently working as Assistant Statistical Of&cer, Office of District Plaaning 85 Statistics, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS .<-^ ^^~ VERSUS . 1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Finance & Planning Departinent, Mantralaya.D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur [Chhatusgarh] Director.Economic & Statistics Directorate, Government of Cbhattisgarh, Raipur [C.G.] ^ ^§€..--/ ,^>;^^-" ^0^^' ^ M 3. Joint Director, Directorate Economic & Statistics, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Raipur [C.G] 4. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of the Personnel & Public Grievance & Pension,Lok Nayak Bhawan, I€han Market, New Delhi PETITION UNDER ARTICLE ^^•"' 226/227 OP TKE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CER'nORARI, MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR V^RITS^DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS: \ .jb' .^ c^a!t!^- ci ^...^"" t'<l" ,C?^'^r^ ^^^\ft p? V-¥*"1' 'A i^.^\6v' "•'l:^ t •>^ ^ ^' -^yy^ ^ n-^spOiideBtNo.6 ougfe^ecretaiy,Genera!Administration ^cfor,Economic&Statisticar M-ectorate^indlyachai^a^ Bliopa!(M.P.) -—-wvw^ ^f ^:r- ^iq^TaHTT^ vj-ucj'^itqiipxi^v^x-t^KB, Rl^i^iy ^ • • k/a^a • • '• • •••'•^•'SS • • »• • • • • »^-tTa• • • • •,,»• • ^200< 050 an^^T<CTR4i<b ?CT3n^$T^+ii<b f' • -''' ' ...^ ^iN-N^ STT^^Ttraq? (^lf^pR[) 11.11.2005 Shri Parag Kotecha, Shri Paukaj Shn'| respondents No. 1 to 3 None for fhe respom Shri Raja Shamia, aiid 6, Heai'd, This is a case when State. of Chhattisgarh. Assistaiit Statistics Offic Plaiinuig & Statistics, ti'ansferred and posted a^ Neera Bhargava has also ^ Goveniiaent GMs Higher Learaed counsel fot petitiouer had filed a re^] No.4 on 19.10.2005, cot respondents No. 1 and 5.| this coiirt agahlst fhe Uj No. 1 aad 5 ie, State of| consider aad decide fhd expeditiously in accords|nce counsel for fhe respondenj cpi<<Fw41^<-ti<iol'<ff^& ^Ri^i^ ^^rf^[W^?T 'ouusel for fhe petitioner. ^astava, Paiiel law^^er for the ent No.4. 'ounsel for fhe respondents No, 5 fhe petitioner was Edlocated to flie fThe petitioner was working as }er in fhe office of the Distdct R|aipui\ The petitioner had been Guna. The petitioner's wife Snit, 'en workuig as Contract Teacher ia ^econdary School, Guna, r fhe petitioner subHiits that the ^resentation before the respondent )y of the saaie was sent to the The petitioner seeks a direction of don of India aiid fhe respondents Chhattisgarh and State of M.P. to representation of fhe petitioner, with law, to which learaed |:s have no objection. SP/F&^ <nfl^im<iT^ \d-ot| "-q iqlw<j, ^^IXH41<&, RlOWy<; .l^;.^;..MP.;..:?p./.3. w^too? 051. ^^Twf^rra? ^ff317^^Ticb^i<h •^)G^ I] ^ -^ SP/FS/2005-20,000 3TT^i?Tq^P(<^llj4<E{) ?^?T^R^Tf%?r3TT^^T -<2-- <pi<i[<lo<Rri *ii^oT^f fe<-3 ^RI^I^ ^3<f^T3n^?T Havm.g heard leaniq regard to the ifacts aa^ respoiident No. 4 is ac<| dispose of representation | law witliia a period of 2 ni| orden In view ofthe foregcj Certified copy, as p| d coziltisel for the parties and having ft circuHistaaces of tlie case fhe [^orduigly directed to consider aad oftlie petitioner ia accordaiice witih. bnths fix>m fhe date ofreceipt ofthis iag, the petition staiids disposed of br Rziles. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge