1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3907 OF 2010 (Shri Devidas Madhavrao Ghode vs. Assistant Charity Commissioner, Nagpur & Ors. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. SEPTEMBER 29, 2010. Heard Shri Abhyankar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Thakare, learned AGP for respondent No.1, Shri Gode, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and Shri Giradkar, learned counsel for respondent No.3. Shri Abhyankar, learned counsel contends that after completion of examination-in-chief of reporting trustees, documents were necessary to cross examine on the point of membership and, therefore, the records from the office of the Assistant Charity Commissioner was sought to be summoned. Shri Gode and Shri Giradkar, learned counsel for the respective respondents state that the petitioner is in management and he is delaying adjudication. They further pointed out that in earlier change report, the proceedings which are now closed for judgment, the examination-in-chief and cross examination has been completed without referring to alleged documents. They have also contended that the application as filed before the Assistant Charity Commissioner does not disclose the 2 purpose for which the documents are summoned. With the assistance of learned counsel, I have perused the records. The application for calling the records only mentions that for deciding the issues involved in the proceedings before the Assistant Charity Commissioner, records of earlier change reports were relevant. The request has been made to call for those change reports for deciding the issue of membership. As one of the earlier change report has been closed for judgment, without looking into those records and the other proceedings are already decided by the Deputy Charity Commissioner, I find that the petitioner has moved a vague application without giving necessary details. I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere in the matter in present circumstances. However, the petitioner is given liberty to challenge the impugned order dated 14.06.2010 passed on Exh. 24 after final adjudication in Change Report No. 485 of 2006, if occasion therefor arises. Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.