C.R. No. 5099 of 2009 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 5099 of 2009 Date of Decision: September 7, 2009 Bhag Dass …..Petitioner Vs. Gurdev Kaur and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.H.S. Dhindsa, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Vide impugned order dated March 30, 2009, an application for framing of additional issues on the basis of pleadings has been allowed. Counsel for the petitioner has contended that the trial Court has wrongly noticed in the order that the application was moved by the defendant. It is submitted that the application for additional issues was moved by the plaintiffs and the onus of the issues has been wrongly placed on the defendant- petitioner. C.R. No. 5099 of 2009 [2] After hearing counsel for the petitioner at length, I am of the opinion that the impugned order does not warrant any interference. So far as the onus to prove the issues on the defendant- petitioner is concerned, it is made clear that the petitioner will be entitled to file an application for rectification of the additional issues, so far as onus propendi has been fixed on the defendant, the trial Court will re-appreciate the facts in context to the application filed and make the necessary correction, if deemed appropriate. Disposed of. September 7, 2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE