1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C. P. No. 60 OF 2009 Siddhartha s/o Ramji Nitnaware v. S.K. Thorat & ors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's and Registrar's orders orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. P.R. Puri Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.K.Mishra A.S.G.I. for Respdts. 1 & 2. Mr. C.N. Adgokar, AGP, for Res. no.3. ..... CORAM: A.B.CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 23 rd SEPTEMBER,_2009. Mr.Mishra learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 & 2 makes a statement that pursuant to the orders made by this Court fresh notification has been issued by the Government of India upon recommendations made by the University Grants Commission, though late, as usually it requires time to complete the procedural methods. Mr.Puri, learned counsel for the petitioner has serious grievance about the actions taken on the basis of the letter dated 14.6.2006 issued by the University Grants Commission which, according to him, was heavily misutilized by vested interest and therefore 2 the contempt petition ought to be taken to its logical end. Having heard learned counsel for rival parties I find that now the Government of India has issued a notification pursuant to the orders made by this Court in W.P. No. 4266/06 and there is compliance, though late. In view of this position, there is no point in continuing with the present contempt proceedings. If at all the petitioner continues to have any grievance regarding the past acts, he is at liberty to work out the substantive rights in appropriate proceedings. Contempt petition disposed of. No costs. C.A. No. 62/09 for intervention stands rejected. JUDGE /TA/ 3