CWP (T) No. 6333 of 2008. 3.3.2011 Present: Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.M. Bisht, Dy. A.G. for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited my attention to several documents placed on record to contend that at no point of time was the petitioner responsible for having absented from duty over different period of times. As prayed for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not intend to go into the veracity of the said statement. From the reply filed by the State, it is quite apparent that petitioner’s claim is yet under consideration with the government. Consequently, as prayed for by the learned counsel for the petitioner a direction is issued to the respondents-State to decide the same, by also taking into account the material placed by the petitioner before this Court. This shall be done within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment. It is open for the petitioner to also place additional material before the appropriate Authority. The decision shall be taken by passing a speaking order which shall be communicated to the petitioner. Needless to add, in the event of the State deciding the matter in favour of the petitioner, all consequential benefits shall follow. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. ( Sanjay Karol) Judge March 3, 2011. (jai)