@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 1627 of2002 Savita Haripriya Wife of Arvind Haripriya aged about 30 years Res1dent of Gauntlya House Clvd Lme Sarangarh Distrlct Ralgarh . Union of India, Through Secretaly Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, New Delhi. 2. Indian Oil Corporation Limited, A Government Company, Registered Office, Indian Oil Bhawan, G—9, Aliyavar Jung Marg, Bandhra (E) Mumbai. 3. Indane Area OEme, Indian Oil Bhawan, VIP Road, Telibandha, Post Ravi Gram, Raipur. My RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION ' F mDIA. SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents. PETITIONER VERSUS ‘ RESPONDENTS ‘ ORAL ORDER (Passed on 043i day of December, 2007) Learned counsel appealing for the petitioner submits that the. petitioner has approached this Court on the basis of a news-paper report published in “Navbharat” on 8m of August, 2002, wherein, it was mentioned that the allotment of Indane L.P.G. distributorship has been cancelled. > 2. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner was allotted Indane ERG. distributorship at Sarangarh on 24.08.2001 (Annemre P/ 14). The petitioner has not been communicated any cancellation order and the petitioner has been operating as it is without any hindrance created by any authority or any person. 3. In View ofthe above, there is nothing in this petition. Even otherwise, since the petitioner has not been communicated any order cancelling the allotment of L.P.G. distributorship, and without any hindrance, the petitioner has been operating the same, this petition has no merit. The petition deserves to be and is accordingly dismissed, summarily. 4. Consequently, M(W)P 745/2002, also stands disposed of. Sdl- thoti‘i sansh K A9“ Judge r, “"7 “Wasp, A: gm mww W l