IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.448 of 2011 1. Kanti Devi 2. Dilip Kumar ---Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- 2. 5.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State as also the learned counsel appearing for the Accountant General. Separate show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party no.2 and 3 and a rejoinder on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although pursuant to the order of this Court on the representation of the petitioner, family pension has been paid to the minor son of the petitioner, namely, Dilip Kumar, but the amount, which has been paid, is erroneously very low. According to the petitioners, the petitioners ought to have been paid the arrears to the tune of Rs.1,75,000/- and odd whereas they have been paid a sum of Rs.35,000/- and odd. The petitioners have given calculation in their rejoinder to the show cause. Learned counsel for the State submits that the matter needs to be accounting/calculation. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the detailed - 2 - calculation, pending the entitlement of the petitioners as the arrears of the pension and the current pension, would be given to the Treasury Officer, Sitamarhi for verification of the claims of the petitioners. The petitioners may do so within a period of four weeks. On receipt of such calculation, the Treasury Officer, Sitamarhi would verify the calculation and upon verification, if any further amount is found admissible for payment, the same may be paid in favour of Dilip Kumar, the minor son of petitioner no.1, namely, Kanti Devi expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months on receipt of such calculation/representation. The contempt application stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)