IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No. 37 of 2009 Anil Kumar …Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …Respondents. Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 and 3. None for respondent no. 4. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) A perusal of the office report reveals that respondent no. 4 is still unserved. In view of the fact that the tenders were invited for the ensuing Kumbh Mela, which is likely to come to an end on 14.4.2010, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition so as to enable him to pursue the same matter before the Lok Ayukta. Learned counsel for the respondents state that they have no objection to the course of action suggested by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforementioned. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 6.4.2010 Rathour