IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17780 of 2009 CHANDRA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 07.09.2009 Head both sides. Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 420, 466, 468, 471 and 120 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation, as per F.I.R. is that a person having lower percentage of marks has been appointed as panchayat Shikshak. It is contended that there is a provision of appeal. Learned counsel for the petitioner next contended that the Mukhiya, who is head of the committee, has already been granted bail by the learned court below. Referring to annexure-3, it is contended that the Block Extension Officer has already been privileged with the anticipatory bail. Considering all these aspects of the matter, this Court is persuaded to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail. in the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, shall be 2 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saharsa in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 151 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. P.K. (K.K. Mandal, J.)