IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20556 of 2010 HARE RAM PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ---------- 07/ 05.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Rahui(Bhagan Bigha) P.S. Case no.73/2008 registered under section 302/34 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act. Petitioner is not named in the FIR but during the course of investigation some witnesses claimed to have seen the petitioner along with some other co-accused persons fleeing from the place of the occurrence. Admittedly, co-accused Teni Yadav and Devan Paswan have already been granted privilege of bail by this court. No doubt, the petitioner carries criminal history of several cases but considering the above stated facts as well as this aspect of the matter that there is no possibility of conclusion of trial of the petitioner in near future, I think it proper to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner (Hare Ram Paswan) is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 4th Addl. Sessions Judge, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Sessions Trial no. 286/2009 arising out of Rahui (Bhagan Bigha) P.S. Case no.73/2008 subject to the conditions that one of the bailers of the petitioner must be either close relative or the family member of the petitioner and furthermore, - 2 - petitioner shall present himself on each and every date during the course of the trial before the learned trial court and if he fails to do so without any valid cause, the court concerned shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bond of petitioner. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)