IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 17TH AUGUST 2009 / 26TH SRAVANA 1931 WP(C).No. 21705 of 2009(G) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- K.V. PONNAN, S/O.VISWANATHAN MOOTHAN, KOTTIL STREET, KARNNAKI NAGAR, PALAKKAD-12. BY ADV. MR.A.R.GANGADAS RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- THE SECRETARY, THE PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY, PALAKKAD. BY MR.V.CHITAMBARESH, SENIOR ADVOCATE, ADV. MR.T.C.SURESH MENON, MR.JIBU P THOMAS, MR.P.S.APPU, MR.A.R.NIMOD, MR.C.A.ANOOP. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.21705 of 2009-G = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 17th day of August, 2009. JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the respondent states that Ext.P6 would be considered. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no dispute regarding the amounts claimed in Ext.P6. At any rate, the respondent has also not taken any objection to Ext.P6 before this Court in spite of the order dated 31.7.2009 requiring the Municipality to state regarding the entitlement of the petitioner to receive the amounts covered by Ext.P6. Accordingly, it is ordered that without prejudice to contentions of parties, the respondent will consider Ext.P6 and if such amounts are not disputed, that would be released at the earliest. It is clarified that this judgment does not touch upon the merits of the claim of the petitioner or any objection of the respondent. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/280809