1 CA NO.16771/2010 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902. CA/16771/2010 In FA/449/1996 WITH X-APL/2/2004 WITH SA/345/1992 WITH CA/1479/2010 In SA/426/1992 -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. C.R.Deshpande, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. P.G.Godhamgaonkar, Adv., for respondent nos. 1 to 6-C. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:2-12-2010 1. By present application, respondent no.3 and 4-A are urged to be restrained from demolishing or constructing or otherwise changing the nature of the suit property i.e. House No.213(new) and 215(new) situated at Kotwal galli, Beed and House No.1978 (new) situated at Bobdeshwar Galli, Beed, pending the hearing and final disposal of the first appeal. In paragraph no.4 of the petition, it is informed that the suit is decreed and 1/8th share claimed by the plaintiff has been granted by the trial Court. It is 2 CA NO.16771/2010 indicated, if the respondent in the application is allowed to continue with the demolition and further construction over the property, the nature of the property would be changed. 2. It is at the risk of the respondents in the application being respondent nos. 3 and 4-A if they are carrying out any construction activities, they will face brunt of ongoing litigation. Needless to add, the respondent in the application shall not claim any equities, if the appeal fails. Application (No. 16771/2010) is now disposed of. Now, the Counsel agree that the matter is to be heard peremptorily on 8th Dec.,2010. Mr.Deshpande, Counsel, has to file reply in C.A.No.1479/2010 which he would be doing upto 8th Dec.,2011. S.O. to 8th Dec.,2011. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/16771-10ca