IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21959 of 2010 DHANIK SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 01.07.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make appropriate corrections in the name of the village of the petitioner mentioned in the body of the application as per the village mentioned in the Vakalatnama filed by this petitioner. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Chautham P.S. No. 173 of 2003 (Supl.) (G.R. No. 1313 of 2003) for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149,302, 364 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the name of the petitioner does not find mention amongst the accused persons named by the informant and that the same has transpired during the course of investigation as being also present at the place of occurrence, let the petitioner namely, Dhanik Singh be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Chautham P.S. No. 173 of 2003 (Supl.) (G.R. No. 1313 of 2003). Bibhash ( Jyoti Saran, J.)