... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3587 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3587 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3587 OF 2004 ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... Office Notes, Office Office Notes, Office Office Notes, Office Memorandum Memorandum Memorandum of Coram, of Coram, of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judges appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judges appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judges orders or directions orders orders or directions orders orders or directions orders and Registrar’s orders and Registrar’s orders and Registrar’s orders ...................................................... ...................................................... ...................................................... Shri. R.Y. Mirza, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2005. DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2005. DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. When this Application was called out in the morning, none appeared for the Applicant. Hence, it was kept back. When the Application is called out on the second occasion, none appears for the Applicant. The record shows that main Criminal Application is dismissed for default as none appeared for the Applicant on two consequitive dates fixed in the Application. 2. Application is dismissed for want of prosecution. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE