IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.32711 OF 2011 ZANTU DASS, S/O SURESH DASS, R/O VILLAGE AMINPUR(KULHARIYA), P.S AMARPUR, DISTRICT BANKA. .... .... PETITIONER VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR .... .... OPPOSITE PARTY ---------- 2 19-10-2011 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner was earlier granted provisional bail by an order dated 08.12.2009 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 42287 of 2009 in pursuance thereof, he was released on bail on 07.01.2010. The petitioner as per his undertaking has not only produced the victim girl who had also remained present before the Court on two consecutive dates i.e. 21.01.2010 and 22.05.2010. The petitioner is thereafter, said to have defaulted in his appearance from 09.05.2010 and ultimately was arrested on 01.07.2011. Though it would be a case of misuse of privilege of bail but then taking into account the deposition of victim girl dated 12.07.2011, specifically asserting that the petitioner had no role to play in the alleged offence of her kidnapping and that she had married younger brother of the petitioner on her own accord, this Court would direct for release of the petitioner, namely, Zantu Dass on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-1st Banka in connection with Amarpur P.S Case No. 194 of 2007(Sessions Trial No. 761 of 2009) subject to the following three conditions:- i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioner will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and his absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of his bail. (iii) The petitioner in case is now made accused in any other criminal case,that would itself lead to cancellation of his bail. RANJAN (Mihir Kumar Jha, J)