IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2087 of 2003 SHEO KUMAR MAJOSIA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- For the petitioner: Mr. Syed Arshad Alam, Advocate Mr. Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad For Respondent No.5: Mr. Nachiketa Jha, Advocate --- 4. 1.4.2010 The writ application was filed seven years back praying to direct the respondents to stop illegal construction being carried on by respondent No.5. No interim order was ever passed in this case. Learned counsel for respondent No.5 has also appeared and states that the writ petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, contests the aforesaid position, but he is unable to substantiate that even after seven years of filing of the writ petition the construction is still going on. In the above circumstances, the writ application is disposed of. However, if the petitioner has any grievance in the matter then he may approach the authorities of the Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation for redressal of the same. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )