.-/5 @6\\ )J 0% HEGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 6843 0f2008 PETITEONER : Saiyad Anwar Ali Age about 42 years, S/o Saiyad Ahmad Ali Rx’o C/18 Sector A 5 Devendra Nagar, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT :Regional Transport Authority, Through the Secretary, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Payasi, Fans! Lawyer for the State/respondent. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 06m day of Decamber, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage: However, the respondent-authority may be directed to consider and decide his pending application dated 26.08.2008 (Annexare P/l) in accordance with law, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible. 2. Shri Payasi, leamed Panel Lawyer for the respondent submits that there is no reason asto why the representation ofthe petitioner, as stated above should not . be considered expeditiously. Shri Fayasi submits that the above-stated representation shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period oftwo weeks from the date ofreoeipt of a copy ofthis order. 3. In view of the clear statement made by learned counsel appearing for the respondent, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing remains to be adjudicated. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotril Judge i