IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2009 / 20TH JYAISHTA 1931 WP(C).No. 11961 of 2009(O) --------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN EP.NO. 76/2008 IN OS.267/2005 OF MUNSIFF COURT, CHANGANASSERRY. .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- MOHANA KUMAR, AGED 78 YEARS, S/O.AYYAPPANACHARI, PANNOOR VEETTIL, VAZHAPPALLI EAST VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERI TALUK. BY ADV. MR.DAISY.I.DANIEL. RESPONDENT: ---------------------- REMESH KUMAR, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.SANKARANACHARI, PANNOOR VEETTIL, VAZHAPPALLI EAST VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERI TALUK. BY ADV. MR.ABRAHAM GEORGE JACOB. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/06/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ----------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.11961 of 2009 - O --------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T Consistently there is no representation for the petitioner in the writ petition as and when posted for hearing. Notice on admission had been ordered and the respondent has entered appearance. Today also the counsel for the respondent is present, but petitioner is absent. Obviously, petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition, and hence the petition is dismissed. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, JUDGE. bkn/-