IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10464 of 2009 PRAMOD SARDAR SON OF LATE SATTAR SARDAR RESIDENT OF VILLATE MACHHA,P.S.TREBENIGANJ,DISTT.SUPAUL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 18.5.2009 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of this application. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered for offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code against unknown dacoits. In course of dacoity, cash, ornaments and one Nokia Mobile 1210 bearing Airtel sim card 9905259484 was also looted. In course of investigation, the petitioner had been apprehended as he was in possession of black coloured Nokia Mobile 1208. Submission is that the number of recovered mobile does not tally with the number looted mobile and the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.IV, Supaul in Sessions Trial No. 82 of 2009 arising out of Pipra P.S.Case No. 95 of 2008. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)