THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6640 of 2006 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and though notice was served, none appeared for the respondents. The petitioner is a tenant, who filed this revision under Section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short ‘the Act’) seeking to assail the orders of eviction passed against him by the Primary Authority as confirmed by the Appellate Authority. Both the Authorities concurrently held that there is default of payment of rents on the part of the petitioner and therefore, eviction orders were passed. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, especially in view of the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the Authorities below, it is not possible for this Court under Section 22 of the Act to re-adjudicate and re-consider the entire issue. There are no merits in the revision. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner-tenant is granted six months time from today for eviction of the premises. No costs. ___________________ B. PRAKASH RAO, J 15th July, 2010 GHN