1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2271 OF 2008 Rajesh B. Pawar ...Petitioner. v. Jagdish B. Mane & Anr. ...Respondents. Ms. Rashmi Gagwani i/by Shri Ganesh Gole, advs. For the Petitioner. Smt. Mallika Ingale, adv. For the Respondent No.1. Ms.A.T.Javeri, APP for the Respondent No.2/State. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : JULY 1, 2010 P.C. 1 This petition was filed against the concurrent findings of the two Courts below whereby the petitioner was convicted and sentenced for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Parties have filed the Consent Terms marked 'X' for Identification and thereby they seek to compound the case. The learned counsel for the parties inform that all the four cheques, which were issued by the petitioner towards the satisfaction of the claim of the complainant have been already encashed. Therefore, parties are allowed to compound the case as per the Consent Terms. Writ Petition is allowed. The impugned order of conviction and sentence is hereby set aside. 2 As the petition itself is disposed off, criminal application no. 2 91 of 2009 does not survive and stands disposed off accordingly. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)