IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31579 of 2008 AKHILESH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 30.7.2008 Heard. This is the renewal prayer, earlier rejection order having been passed in Cr. Misc. No. 11914 of 2007. The Court does not have any reason to reconsider the earlier order. The petition is dismissed. However, the Court is concerned about the efficiency of the Officer and his sensitivity. Knowing fully well that the prayer has been rejected by this Court, that the man is in custody and very well having framed the charges himself, the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court No.5, Gaya, was adjourning the case which was for evidence of the witnesses for over a month. The Officer does not appear being sensitive towards recording of the evidence of the witnesses in the case of an accused who is in custody and requirement of taking up such cases on priority basis. Let an explanation be called for from the Officer concerned and place the same before me as I am the Inspecting Judge of that particular Judgeship. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)