IN THE HIGILCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH, AT BILASPUI ContemDtPetitionNo. ^-^ /2008 APPLICANTS '(Petitioners) ^...-:-:"^^'^^ ^^•-^ '^.-^^ NdN-APPLICANT Ku. A. Indira, D/o. Shri Venkat Rao, aged about 35 years. Manohar Jethani, S/o. Late Dr. Variyal Das Jethani, aged about 41 years. Both are resident of Ganeshram Nagar, Baans-Tall, ^Amardeep ^ Talkies Road, ^^ur^.G.). VERSUS fitendra Shukla, Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.). CONTEMFT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA. READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971. [I-HC-22 'y sn^i^ ft-li+ 311^1 ff^<ifi^ 'TST 't|i''<]ci's<, ^Til'y'iG, ls«'ii'Mi< STI^T WK IIHMI' Chlich""""""""""""""""""'"'"TF^ 20° fN^T' sn^i'?(<iTwgf??[ cbiAl!<rl4lT1 4R<vff'^ [s*<1 iFai^K ^arfitftTsn^t HIGH COURT OF CHHlATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Contempt FetitioaNo.46/2008 APPLICANTS (Petitioners) 1. Ku. A| about 2. Manoh Jethar^i, aged about 41 years Both Baans (C.G.) VERSUi NON-APPLICANT Jitend' Muni ORAL O ii7. 03. DHIRENDRA MISHRA. J. Shri Virendra Shanna. c<i Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sr.l Advocate for fhe non-appUcant^ Heard. This conteinpt petition W.P. (PIL) No. 5589 of 2007, directed to dispose of the cxpeditiously, preferably withij date of receipt of a copy of that appropriate to seek responsel Raipur regardiiig non-coiupliai^ Indira, D/o. Shri Venkat Rao, aged 35 vears ar Jethani, S/o Late Dr. Variyal Das are resident of Ganeshram Nagar, •Tall, Ainardeep Talkies Road, Raipur -a Shukla, Municipal Commissioner, I'osl CorDorsition.. Rsiuur (C.Q.^ RDER 2008 unsel for the appUcaats. Advocate with Shri J.K. Gupta, has been ffled by the petitioner against violation of the order djated 12th Noveniber 2007 passed iu whereby fhe respondent No.2 was -epresentations of the petitioners 1 a period of one inonth fi-oni the order. Before issuiiig notice t4? fhe conteiunor, it was thought froin fhc Muiucipal Corpoi-ation, ce offhe above order. In compHance tiiereof, repfy has been fil^d by fhe Corporation, whereiu A. -\n-r?i"' ^i^ ^i-ta^ ..1> EBKaaa, C—78 K-i s 3:Sq' ri<l<41^, »Tf1y'l<»,RlWIUy NINdl sb^leb WI. 200 3n^v WSK (4<!ii'i«i<w) TOIIW^lfel3II^T 2. tieen unconditional apology has fhe order. However, it has| contenipt has been purged the petitioner stand dec^i Annexures-A & B. Learued Sr. Advocatel been initiated against 17 eu| drains of the said locaUtv B who agaui niade been lodged agauist fhein. In view of fhe Corporation aad fhe fact against the encD3achers, th^ as bonafide. No fiirther the conteinpt proceediD.g is Accordingly, fhe petit^n encroachtnent coutter <tii*i[<rf^l'1 ^W^ ^'fe1^ <f^R$t< ^TSJRlII 311^1 tendered for delay in comptiance of been submitted fhat since fhea, fhe and the representations subnutted by ded vide letter dated 1.3.2008. of submitted that fhe action has akeadv ^roachers and cleaning of the nala aad ^as been carried out. The 14 persons, [nent, were also ejected aud FIR has fbat oro<teedines afEdavit filed by fhe Municipal they have ah-eady irdtiated action d; auoloev tendered bv theni is accepted ui the inatter is called fer and ^iropped. is disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge