IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.1138 of 2010 with CWPs No. 1139, 1141,1142, 1143, 1144 , 1146, 1147, 1148, 1149, 1150, 1151, 1152 and 1160 of 2010. Decided on: April 22, 2010 [ For title: Please see below ] Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the Petitioners : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General for respondents No. 1 and 2. Ms. Meena Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate for respondents No. 3 and 4. M/s Vijay Pandit & MA Khan, Advocates for respondent No.5. Mr. B.C. Negi, Advocate for respondent No.6. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) CWP No. 1138 of 2010 Hemant Kumar ……Petitioner Versus 1. State of Himachal Pradesh and others ….Respondents. 2 CWP No. 1139 of 2010 Surender Kumar ……Petitioner Versus 2. State of Himachal Pradesh and others ….Respondents. CWP No. 1141 of 2010 Dhyan Singh ……Petitioner Versus 3. State of Himachal Pradesh and others ….Respondents. CWP No. 1142 of 2010 Parkash Chand ……Petitioner Versus 4. State of Himachal Pradesh and others ….Respondents. CWP No. 1143 of 2010 Parkash Chand ……Petitioner Versus 5. State of Himachal Pradesh and others ….Respondents. CWP No. 1144 of 2010 Naresh Kumar ……Petitioner Versus 6. State of Himachal Pradesh and others ….Respondents. CWP No. 1146 of 2010 Vinod Kumar ……Petitioner Versus 7. State of Himachal Pradesh and others ….Respondents. 3 CWP No. 1147 of 2010 Padam Singh ……Petitioner Versus 8. State of Himachal Pradesh and others ….Respondents. CWP No. 1148 of 2010 Ram Lal Sharma ……Petitioner Versus 9. State of Himachal Pradesh and others ….Respondents. CWP No. 1149 of 2010 Ashok Kumar ……Petitioner Versus 10. State of Himachal Pradesh and others ….Respondents. CWP No. 1150 of 2010 Dharam Singh ……Petitioner Versus 11. State of Himachal Pradesh and others ….Respondents. CWP No. 1151 of 2010 Mehar Lal Chauhan ……Petitioner Versus 12. State of Himachal Pradesh and others ….Respondents. CWP No. 1152 of 2010 Krishan Dayal ……Petitioner Versus 13. State of Himachal Pradesh and others ….Respondents. 4 CWP No. 1160 of 2010 Bhagat Singh ……Petitioner Versus 14. State of Himachal Pradesh and others ….Respondents. _____________________________________________________________ Learned counsel for fifth respondent in all the Writ Petitions submits that the impugned order Annexure P-3 in CWPs No. 1138, 1139, 1141, 1143, 1144 , 1146, 1147, 1148, 1149 & 1160 of 2010 and Annexure P-4 in CWPs No. 1142, 1150, 1151, and 1152 of 2010 have been withdrawn by the fifth respondent. Therefore, the petitioners need not apprehend their termination at this stage. Therefore, all the Writ Petitions are closed, so also the pending applications. Dasti copy on usual terms. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice April 22, 2010 (Justice R.B. Misra), (rks) Judge.