1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.: 2789 OF 2009 Dayanand Ambadas Bhosale Versus State of Maharashtra *** Mr. Uday S. Malte, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. P. M. Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent/ State. *** 1. Heard learned counsel for the accused/ applicant. Since the accused was absconding, did not respond to N.B.W. followed by proclamation under section 82 of Criminal Procedure Code, in view of there being a standing N.B.W. he was nabbed. The learned Additional Sessions Judge has indeed, while rejecting the application, by order dated 6th April, 2009, directed the learned J.M.F.C., Lohara to dispose of the case within three months. Mr. Malte informs, evidence of one witness is so far completed and there are 4 or 5 witnesses. In the fact situation, learned J.M.F.C. will ensure to adhere the time schedule as was indicated in the order in Criminal Bail Application No. 30 of 2009 dated 6th April, 2009. With this, application is disposed of. [K. U. CHANDIWAL, J.] Dated:18/08/2009. ans/2789