IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10771 of 2011 Date of decision: 12.09.2011 Gurdeep Kaur ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Pardeep Bajaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jaswinder Singh, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Gautam Bhardwaj, Advocate, for Mr. Samarth Sagar, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 to 4 as well as for respondent No.5 state that since petitioner was hospitalized and could not be heard by the authorities concerned, therefore, impugned order be set aside and matter be remitted back to respondent No.1 to decide it afresh after hearing both the parties within such time as fixed by this Court. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, impugned order stands set aside and matter stands remitted to respondent No.1. Parties shall appear before respondent No.1 on 17.10.2010. Thereafter, respondent No.1 shall pass fresh order after hearing both the parties in accordance with law within 60 days. (Alok Singh) Judge September 12, 2011 R.S.