IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 10TH MARCH 2008 / 20TH PHALGUNA 1929 RP.No. 311 of 2008() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.6091/2008 Dated 21/02/2008 .................... PETITIONER: --------------- V.R.RATHEESH, PROPRIETOR, NICHOLAS BOTTLE TRADING CO., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW SRI.SATHISH NINAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------- 1. FAST TRACK TEAM-II, COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD. 2. THE KERALA SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ADDITIONAL BENCH, PALAKKAD. 3. THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, PALAKKAD. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== R.P.No.311 OF 2008 IN W.P.(C) NO. 6091 OF 2008 ==================== Dated this the 10th day of March, 2008 O R D E R The writ petition was dismissed by judgment dated 21st February, 2008. Review is sought relying on Annexure A judgment of the Division Bench. The judgment itself makes it clear that it was rendered on the special facts that were projected before the Division Bench. I do not see anything special in this judgment calling for review. Even otherwise, petitioner has no case that this judgment was cited when the case was considered. Review petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp