IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2950 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 28, 2011 Suresh Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Alok Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The application filed by the petitioner for sending the signatures and handwriting of the complainant for comparison has been declined. The complainant while appearing as PW2 has resiled from his earlier version. While under cross-examination by the Public Prosecutor, he, however, admitted his signatures on the complaint Ex.PD, so also his address and Mobile number, but voluntarily stated that these signatures were obtained by the police on blank papers. In this background, the request of the petitioner for getting his signatures etc. compared would be futile once the person has admitted his signatures and has explained, there would not be any need to get his signatures compared. The Court, in my view, has rightly declined this request in view of the facts and circumstances of the case. No case for interference, thus, is made out. Dismissed. November 28, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE