IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 18TH MAY 2010 / 28TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 15168 of 2010(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. BHASKARAN, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, KATTAKALAM HOUSE, KALLEPADAM DESOM, PAZHAYANNUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. SASI, AGED 33 YEARS, S/O.CHAMIYAR, PUTHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, KUNNAMBULLI, PAZHAYANNUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. DASANKUTTY, S/O.NARAYANAN, KOTTAMKUNNATH HOUSE, KUNNAMBULLI, PAZHAYANNUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. RAJAN, S/O.RAMAN EZHUTHACHAN, VENATTIL HOUSE, PARAKKAL DESOM, P.O.PAZHAYANNUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. SUKUMARAN, S/O.MADHAVAN, KIZHAKKEVEETTIL HOUSE, PATTOLA, P.O.PUTHUKKODE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR SMT.P.A.ANITHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 15168 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 18th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioners challenge Ext.P1 order of the respondent, whereby each petitioner has been directed to pay an amount of Rs.15,000/- as the value of the bullock cart used for illegal transport of the river sand. The petitioners were not able to convince the District Collector that the river sand was being transported legally. The petitioners are unable to convince this Court also about the legality of the transport of the sand. That being so, there is absolutely no infirmity in Ext.P1 order. Therefore, the writ petition fails and accordingly, the same is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge