1 1435.11.ao IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1435 OF 2011 Mr. Dilip K. Abhyankar and Ors ... Appellants V/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and Ors ... Respondents. Mr. Pradeep Havnoor, i/ b Mrs. Nayana Pardeshi, for Appellants. Mr. K. K. Soran,for BMC. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATED : DECEMBER 22,2011. P.C. : Since the challenge raised in this appeal from order is in respect of grant of ad-interim relief by the trial Court in view of order dated 19/12/2011, this appeal from order can be conveniently disposed of by directing trial Court to dispose of pending Notice of Motion expeditiously. 2. It is stated that the Municipal Corporation is raising construction over an extended area of plot unauthorizedly. There are certain objections raised in respect of raising of the construction by Municipal Corporation on various grounds. The objections shall have to be considered after extending opportunity of hearing to the other 2 1435.11.ao side to submit their case before the Trial Court. It would suffice the purpose if the Trial Court is directed to expedite the matter. Whatever civil construction would be done,it would be at the risk of the Corporation. 3. The trial Court is, thus, directed to decide the pending Notice of Motion as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of writ of this order. The Municipal Corporation shall be at liberty to file their written statement/ reply before the trial Court along with documents, if any. 4. With the aforesaid directions, appeal from order stands disposed of. In view of disposal of appeal from order, pending civil application does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (R.M.BORDE, J.)