' N THE: HIGH COURT 10F JUDICATURE. AT—BILASPUR(C.G.) I . ‘ A ’ I . l 1 WRIT PETITION NOMg’E OF 2004 ‘ BETWEEN DR M P NAVRANG AGED 58 YEARS V SON OF LATE SHRI G R NAVRA ~ POSTED AS MEDICAL OFFICER AT- CIVIL DISPENSARY (MINI P H LAL BAHADUR NAGAR , . DISTRICT RAINANDGAON (C G R/O- LAL BAHADUR NAGAR DISTRICT— INANDGAON_(C G.) q x PER ETITION VERSUS \- w I I 1 ) I x I 1. STATE OF CI-ll-IATTISGARH ’ I THROUGH THE SECRETARY R f r PUBLId HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE MANTRALAYA D K S BHAWAN RAIPUR AT — MJNANDGAON (c G ) DISTRICT RAJNANDGAON (c G WRIT TETITION UNDER ARTICLE; " "68 ; 22 OF CONsTITUTION OF mmA eg 2. I 5PARTICULARS OF TEE'RESPONDENTS f: As above in cause titl NG ' f \ C ) ) i, J ) 1, ' PARTICULARS OF THE ‘PETITIONER . ‘ I iAs aboye in bause title - } . I XI—HC-22 6.4.20D5 Shri A. Kesharwani, counsel or the petitioner. Shri U.N.S. Dec, Govt. Advo ate for the State, Heard 1eamed counsei for th parties. The petitioner haa preferre this petition under Article 226/227 of the Const‘rtutmn of indie questioning the propriety of order dated 26.10.2004 (Annexure P-1) passed by respon ent No.1 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from ,Civil Dispensary (Mini P.H.C.), Lai Bahadur Nagar, District Rajnandgaon to Community Health Center, Chhuikhadan, District Rainanqgaoén. Learned counsel for the itioner‘submits that the petitioner was tra'nsferretl? in place of one Dr. G. Tiwari, who was working as Senior Medical Oflicer at Community H alth Centre, Chhuikhadan. However, vide ' order-dated 8.11.2004 the trans r order of said Dr. MG. Tiwari'has been cancelied and he was again pos temporarily at Community Health Centre, Chhuikhadan. Counsel further su mits that though the petitioner has been relieved from Civil Dispensary, Lal Bahadur Nager but since the transfer order of said Dr. MG. Tiwari has been oelied, the petitioner may be permitted to continue at Lal Bahadur Nagar, Rajnandgaon and in that connection the petitioner may be allowed to ma e a representation to respondent No.1, t which teamed Government Advoca e has no objection. Havinglheard learned coun ei for the parties and having regard to the order-dated 8.11.2004 whereby sfer of said Dr. MG. Tiwari has been cancelled, and he has been allo to continue at Community Health Centre, Chhuikhadan. Rainandgaon. wher the petitioner was transferred.’l am of the opinion that there is no place for petitioner to join at CHO, Chhuikhadan and as such the petitioner has to continue at Civil Dispensaryi§ir§ihadur t . t n o w ‘ n e XI—HC-22 Nagar. Accordingly, the petitioner to res'pondent No.1 within *en d turn respondent no.1 shat! deci aocordance with law within a perio raised by the petitioner and panic hen the order of Dr. MG. T ailowed to continue at Chhuikha then the petitionei' has to be ai Bahadut Nagar tlii any other order With ihe above obsarvation of, Ccnsequentiy, MW P No disposed of Certlfed copy as per rules. aiiowed to make a deiaiied representation from day raising all his grievances and in e the representation of the petitioner in of 15 days after considering all the points - iariy. in view of the order dated 8.1 1 .2004 i has been cancelled and he has been an, where the petitioner was transferred. wed to continue at Civil Dispensary, Lai passed. i and direction, the petition stands disposed 4830104 and LA. No.9438l04 also stand Sd/- L.C.BHADOO Judge ' (@W) i a w i ' ‘ r