IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2008 / 21ST POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 33088 of 2007(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SUNIL RAJ.K.K., S/O.K.KRISHNAN, AGED 42 YEARS, KARIPARAMPU HOUSE, PALACHUVADU ROAD, PACHALAM P.O., THRIKKANARVATTOM DESOM, ERNAKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ SRI.ANVER BASHEER RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. SONY.C.MADATHIL, MANAGING DIRECTOR CONTOUR READYMIX PVT.LTD., PALACHUVADU ROAD, VENNALA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 028. 2. SOBY C.MADATHIL, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CONTOUR READYMIX PVT.LTD., PALACHUVADVU ROAD, VENNALA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 028. 3. GEORGE MATHEW, SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGER, CONTOUR READYMIX PVT.LTD., PALACHUVADU ROAD, VENNALA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 682 028. 4. NAVAS, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION. 5. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOCHI CITY, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.PAUL K.PETER G.P.SRI. SALIM P.A THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC.NO.33088/2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DTD 28.10.2007. /TRUE COPY/ cl K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & P.N. RAVINDRAN, JJ. --------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.33088 OF 2007- L -------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of January, 2008. JUDGMENT Balakrishnan Nair, J: The petitioner has approached this Court alleging that the 4th respondent, Sub Inspector of Police, is harassing him at the instance of the 3rd respondent, under whom the petitioner was an employee. According to him, the Police Inspector obtained his signature in two blank papers. 2. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the 4th respondent submitted that the 3rd respondent filed a complaint before the police alleging that the petitioner, who was an employee, misappropriated some amount from the industrial unit of the 3rd respondent. So, the parties were called to the police station, the matter was settled and the petition was closed by the police. It is also submitted that the police have not harassed the petitioner and they have no intention to harass the petitioner. This submission is recorded and the writ petition is closed. To redress WPC.33088/07 . 2 the grievance of the petitioner, he may pursue the remedies available to him under law before other forums. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. cl WPC.33088/07 . 3