IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.4547 OF 2009 Between:- Narava Chinnayya …Petitioner A n d Mentada Pydithalamma and others. …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.4547 OF 2009 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 12-08-2009 in I.A.No.726 of 2009 in I.A.No.118 of 2007 in L.A.O.P.No.189 of 1987, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram, wherein the application filed by the petitioner herein for issuance of cheque for Rs.10,18,281/- together with subsequent interest, was dismissed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Arbitration appearing for the 7th respondent. Perused the records. 3. It is not disputed that even as per the detailed calculation sheet prepared and filed by the Special Deputy Collector (L.A), Bobbili, a sum of Rs.8,66,510-62 Ps was ascertained to be the amount due on account of acquisition of the land belonging to the petitioner in an extent of Ac.21-40 cents in Sy.Nos.66/2, 67/2P and 69/1. The said amount was also deposited before the trial Court. With the accrued interest, the total amount payable to the petitioner came to Rs.10,18,281/. It appears that when the cheque application was filed by the petitioner seeking withdrawal of the said amount, the 7th respondent-LAO objected for withdrawal of the same on the ground that some third parties have filed the suit O.S.No.1 of 2005 claiming a share in the amount and also for injunction. It is also not disputed that subsequently the said dispute was referred to Lok Adalath and the matter was settled before the Lok Adalath and the suit O.S.No.1 of 2005 was also dismissed in terms of the award passed by the Lok Adalath. 4. As seen from the award passed by the Lok Adalath, all the plaintiffs therein, who are respondents 1 to 6 herein, agreed that the first defendant therein i.e., the petitioner herein is at liberty to withdraw the compensation amount deposited in E.P.No.7 of 1999 in L.A.O.P.No.189 of 1987, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram. Thus, as per the terms of settlement arrived at before the Lok Adalath, respondents 1 to 6 herein had no objection for withdrawal of the amount by the petitioner herein which is in deposit and when that is so, the 7th respondent-LAO cannot have any tenable objection for withdrawal of the said amount by the petitioner herein, when the 7th respondent himself deposited the said amount stating the same to be due and payable to the petitioner. 5. In the circumstances, the impugned order dated 12-08-2009 is set aside and consequently the petitioner is held entitled for withdrawal of the said amount lying in deposit. 6. In the result, the civil revision petition is allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 06th November, 2009. Lrkm.