WRIT PETITION fS) N0. :1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR OF 2007 Ram Kishore Sharma Aged about 46 years S/o Late Mahadeo Prasad Shanna, .-•t^^/> S/o Late Mahadeo Frasad Slianna, 'y.^'^Tff* Senior Horticulture Development .2. Officer, In-charge Asstt. DirectorCHoroticulture), Raigarh (CG) VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh, Through - its Secretary, Department Agriculture, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) The Director, Directorate ofHorticulture, Govemment ofChhattisgarh, Raipur (CG) ,Hakim Singh Chouhan Retd. Asstt. Director, Horticulture, Through - Asstt. Director, Horticulture, Raigarh(CG) K.K. Pandey, ^- Asstt. Director, Horticulture, Korba (CG) Siya Ram Yadav, ^. Asstt.Director, Horticulture, Mahasamund (CG) Krishna Pratap Smgh, Retd. Asstt. Director, Horticulture, Through - Dy. Director, Horticulture, Raipur (CG) Jagdev Prasad Turkane, Asstt. Director, Horticulture, Jaspur(CG) ^STS; y''t°^s'SSff:!3S'S^^S^^^S:S?S'sslaw;-f^'^s.-;.-'^s::fssa^ WMT PETmONTJNDBRARTICLE 226 -50F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ¥- HtGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR ^ y PETITiONER VVRiT PETiTSON (S) N0.3527 OF 2007 Ram Kishore Sharma RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisaarh (Writ Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution+ of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri P.S. Koshy and Shri H.S. Patei, Advocate for the pefitioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. Genera! with Shri A.V. Sridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDERfORAU (Passed on this 27h day ofApril, 2010) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that on reconsideration of letter dated 8-4-2009, the seniority of the petitioner has been fixed at S.No.12 in lieu of S.No.17. Learned counse! further submits that 'in viewof the newly fixed seniority the petitioner is fit for promotion, as he comes within the zone of consideration in either case of merit-cum-seniority or seniority-cum-merit. 2) In view of foregoing, the petitioner prays that he may be permltted to make a representation to the respondent authorities having regard to the newiy fixed seniority i.e. at S.No.12 for consideration of his case at par alona with others, who were considered eartier. 3} At this juncture, Shri Murthy, tearned Dy. Adv. General appearing with Shri Sridhar, fearned Panei Lawyer submits that if the representation is made by the petitioner, the same shail be considered and decided, in accordance with taw and on its own merlts, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. , 4) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihom Judge