IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC(T) No. 238 of 2008. Decided on: 5th October, 2010. Shanti Thakur. …Petitioner. -Versus- Sh. B.M. Nanta and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): It has come in the reply that the petitioner stood promoted with all consequential benefits as per Annexure C/I, dated 1st June, 2005. It can safely be presumed that the judgment dated 29th September, 2004 has been implemented in letter and spirit. However, it is made clear that if the judgment in question has not been implemented, the same shall be implemented in letter and spirit and all the consequential benefits shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of two months from today. 2. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 05, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.