IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No.10034 of 2006 Between: RK4ces Security &Manpower Services Pvt., Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, Anil Steven, S/o J.P.Rao, 39 years, MIG 43, APIIC Colony, Zeedimetla, RR District at Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER AND 1 Central Power Distribution Company of AP. Rep. by its Secretary/Chairman and Managing Director, Khairathabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Superintendent Engineer, Operation, Circle, APCPDCL, Mint Compound, Hyderabad. 3 The Chief General Manager (Expr), APCPDCL, Sitaramprasad Mansion, Red Hills, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly writ of Mandamus calling the Tender Notification Published in Website APCPDCL on 04-5-2006 and declaring the same as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law, violative of Articles 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India and discriminative in nature, ultra-vires and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the Tender Notification dt. 04-5-2006, in respect of the 3 divisions i.e. (Erragadda, Bowenpally and paradise) and to incorporate the tender conditions in agreement with out any changes in respect of the duration to execute the spot billing work allotted the petitioner company and extend the reasonable opportunity to execute the work in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.V.RAJA RAM Counsel for the Respondents: MR.O. MANOHAR REDDY The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No.10034 of 2006 ORDER: Earlier when the mater was called on 10.07.2008, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence the matter was directed to be posted today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM 15th July, 2008. IBL