CR No. 1772 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.1772 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.03.2011. Mohinder Singh .......Petitioner Vs. Sital Singh ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... SABINA, J. Plaintiff has filed a suit for recovery on the basis of pronote and receipt. Vide impugned order dated 1.3.2011, the application moved by the petitioner-defendant to produce the statement of Darshan Kumar in another suit, by way of additional evidence, was dismissed. Hence, the present petition by the petitioner-defendant. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves dismissal. A perusal of the impugned order dated 1.3.2011 reveals that the petitioner had failed to produce on record copy of the statement of Darshan Kumar sought by him to be produced by way of additional evidence. Although, now the copy of the said statement has been placed on record along with this petition CR No. 1772 of 2011 (O&M) -2- but since the same was not produced before the trial court, the impugned order calls for no interference. Moreover, the case is listed before the trial court for today for rebuttal evidence, if any and arguments. Hence, no ground for interference is made out. Dismissed (SABINA) JUDGE March 15, 2011 Gurpreet