IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.36627 of 2010 RANJEET KUMAR JAISWAL, S/o Sri Satya Narain Prasad Jaiswal. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 12.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 11.01.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 46126 of 2009 and also by order dated 23.06.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 18609 of 2010 but was given liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge but without bifurcation of his case. It has been submitted that the petitioner was the sole accused left to be charged and therefore charges against him solely has been framed on 31.08.2010. Considering the same and in case the petitioner was the sole accused left to be charged which fact shall be verified by the court below, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Patna City, Patna in connection with S.Tr. No. 1162 of 2010 arising out of Chowk P.S. Case No. 157 of 2005 subject to the 2 following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father/brother of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)