^ y GH COIJRJ C^.CHHATnSOARH AT BILASPIJR PETmONER WRIT PETmON (C\ No. 3013 of2009 : M/s. Shri Hare Krishna Sponge Iron Ltd. a company duly registered under the rel<ivant provisions of Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Siltara, Raipur flirou^a ite Qfficer/Aufhorized Signatory Shri NXAjay Kumar, son ofLate N.K.Kochupuran, aged abut 56 years, resident of Kabir Nagar, Ring Road No. 2,Raipur(C.G.) VER8U8 : Chhattisgarh State Industrial Developmaat Corporation Ltd. Pandri, Raipur, A Chhattisgarh Govemment Undertaking tiirough its Maimgmg Director, Chhattisgarh State Indusfcrial Development Corporation Ltd. Raipur (C*G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER AR'nCLE 226 OF THE CONSTnVnON OF INDIA. SB: Hon'ble Slu4 Satish K. Agnfliotri, J. RESPONDENT Present: Shri B.P.Shaiina, Advocate for tfie petitioner. Sliri KasliifShdceel, Advoeate forthe respondent. ORDER<ORAL) (Passed on 30U1 day of Jime, 2009) Hfeard. 1. By this petitioii, fh^ petitioner irapugns the notice dated 12^05.2009 (Amiexure P/12) being illegal, arbitrary aad unsugtainable in law. 2. Shri Sharma, leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner siibmits that tfae petitioner has received notice dated 12.5.2009, whereby the petitioner has been asked to submit his response within a period of60 days. Th^reafter, fhe order may be passed by the respondent authorities on complction of60 days, ^s^?" as is evident from the provisions ofclause 26 oftihie lease deed dated 30 JWIG^ 2003 (Annexure P/l). Tfoe petitionw may be deprived ofhis alloteient offhe laiid and furtfaer dispossession/demolition may take pla^e. ^iri Shamia further submits that reply to the impugned notice has already been filed, 3. Per contra, Shri KashifShakeel, leamed counsel appearing for the reqpondent submits that only after considermg the reply of the petitioner, appropriate order shall be passed, however, no action shall be taken before expiry of 30 da^ of the passing of the order, to enable fhe petitioner / lessee te mato a representation as prescribed undssr clause 36 offhe lease deed dated 30th Juae, 2003 (Amiexure P/l). 4. Be that as it may, the respondent authorities may pass order aftor comidermg tiie reply ofllie petitioner, ifany, m accordance with law^ aAer e^qpiry of60 days. Thereafter, as submitted by leamed counsel for the respondeid, no action m required to be taken for a period of 30 days to ^nable fhe petitiotier to take appropriate steps under fhe provisions ofclause 36 ofthe lease deed, ifsoadvised. 5. In view ofthe foregoing, this petition stands dispos€?dof. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Amit