IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25730 of 2008 BHIM YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29/07/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. The written report was given by Shambhu Saran Sharma that his father had accompanied Jitendra Sharma, Kaushal Sahrma and Sanjay Sharma for settlement of a dispute. Those three persons came running and told that Arjun Yadav, Bhim Yadav the petitioner, Sachita Yadav and two others have conspired and in furtherance of conspiracy Dwarika Yadav has fired. Later on the petitioner and others namely Sachita Yadav, Arjun Yadav also fired which proved fatal for informant’s father. Submission is that the informant is not the eye witness to the occurrence. There is no evidence to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime. The allegation is of general in nature. Further submission is that similarly situated accused persons Ram Swarup Yadav, Arjun Yadav and Dwarika Yadav have been admitted to bail by this court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner Bhim Yadav is directed to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge Ist, Hilsa in S. Tr. No. 738 of 2007 arising out of Hilsa P.S. Case No. 57 of 2002. avin. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)