IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2685 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 2685 OF 2005 APPLICATION NO. 2685 OF 2005 Shashi Gopal ....Applicant. versus M.T.V. India P.Ltd. & anr...... Respondents. ..... Shri Ganesh Bhujbal for Prakash Naik for applicant. Mrs. M.M.Deshmukh APP for respdt. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM ; A.M. ; A.M. ; A.M. KHANWILKJAR, J. KHANWILKJAR, J. KHANWILKJAR, J. DATED; DATED; DATED; DECEMBER 20, DECEMBER 20, DECEMBER 20, 2005 2005 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. The grounds raised before this court can be effectively answered by the Revisional Court. 2. As alternative efficacious remedy is available to the applicants by way ofi revision before the Sessions Court in view of the decision of this Court in the case of V.K.Jain & Ors. Vs. Pratap V. Padode V.K.Jain & Ors. Vs. Pratap V. Padode V.K.Jain & Ors. Vs. Pratap V. Padode reported in 2005 2005 2005 (3) Mh.L.J. 778 (3) Mh.L.J. 778 (3) Mh.L.J. 778 and unreported decision of this court in Criminal W.P. No.1023 of 2005 dated 8th W.P. No.1023 of 2005 dated 8th W.P. No.1023 of 2005 dated 8th December December December 2005 2005 2005 in the case of Chetan R. Nagda & Ors. Chetan R. Nagda & Ors. Chetan R. Nagda & Ors. Vs. Vs. Vs. N.D.Pawar & anr., N.D.Pawar & anr., N.D.Pawar & anr., counsel for the applicant fairly prays for withdrawal of the application with liberty to take recourse to remedy of revision. Hence, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. All questions are left open. 3. The applicant to file such revision Application within four weeks from today. Till such time, no precipitative action be taken against the applicant. Revision Application, if filed within four weeks from today, be considered on its own merits in accordance with law. 4. In case, there is any delay in filing Revision Application, court will take into account the fact that the applicant had first approached this court, which period may be excused in computing delay. 5. Applications disposed of on the above terms. xxxx