CMPMO No.638/2009 17.12.2009 Present: Mr. Naresh Kaul,Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. J.S.Rana,Asstt.A.G. for respondents No. 1and 2. Mr. Anup Rattan,Advocate, for respondent No.3. The petitioner is aggrieved of the order dated 3rd October,2009 for the reasons that the same was passed without hearing the complainant. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate has invited my attention to the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ petition No. 2602/2009 titled as Neelam Kumari Vs. State of H.P and others, whereby under similar circumstances, the petitioner was directed to file statutory appeal, which right undoubtedly is available to the petitioner. The petitioner is directed to avail the alternate remedy of filing the appeal. In the event of the statutory appeal being filed, issue of delay shall not be raised by the respondents and the same shall be decided by the appropriate authority expeditiously. Liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the Court again, if need so arises. Interim order passed is vacated. The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications. “Dasti copy.” (Sanjay Karol), Judge. December 17th,2009 (Rita)