IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.717 of 2010 AMAR NATH MISHRA S/o Suresh Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Murarpur, P.O.- Kapsima, P.S.-Hilsa, Distt.- Nalanda. . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Block Supply Officer, Harnaut, Distt.- Nalanda. . . . . . Respondents. ----------- 4/ 17.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the instant writ application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing seizure of TATA (MAGIC) (S) bearing registration no. BR 21 D- 0668 (wrongly mentioned in the First Information Report as BR 31D-0668) made on 06.04.2010 by Block Supply Officer, Harnaut in Harnaut (Telmar) P.S. case no. 60 of 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is merely owner of the vehicle and not a P.D.S. dealer. At the request of the P.D.S. dealer, on the basis of fair, the vehicle carried the rice in question. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the vehicle in question is a commercial vehicle and no useful purpose will be served in detaining the vehicle in question. As such, if petitioner files an application before the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda, the learned Magistrate would release the vehicle on furnishing of the adequate sureties. The release will be subject to the result of prosecution case or confiscation proceeding. Let this order be sent to the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda through Fax at the cost of the petitioner. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)