IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 2211 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 2nd August 2010. Prabhu Dayal Petitioner through Mr. R.K.Arora, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents through Mr. K.S.Sidhu, Dy.AG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] The petitioner seeks a direction for his appointment as Pharmacist under the Rural Medical Officer, Subsidiary Health Centre, Dalmir Khera, Block Khuian Sarvar, District Ferozepur. It is alleged that respondent No. 6 who is working as Pharmacist in the said Center is ineligible. Reliance is placed upon Memos dated 27.11.2009 [Annexure P-4] and dated 28.1.2010 [Annexure P-6] to contend that the petitioner has already been ordered to be appointed being a qualified Pharmacist. In its reply/affidavit, respondent No. 5 has placed on record a government decision dated 9.4.2010 [Annexure R5/6] wherein it has been decided that the Para-Medicos who are already working with the Rural Medical Officers be not relieved till some fresh policy decision is taken by the State Government. That being so, no direction to appoint the petitioner in place of respondent No. 6 can be issued at this stage. However, having regard to the fact that the State Government is required to take some policy decision with regard to deployment of the para- medicos, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1 to take an appropriate policy decision in the matter as early as possible and preferably within two months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Disposed of. Dasti. August 02, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE