1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 1185 OF 2006 M/s. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd........Appellant versus M/s. Madhu Milan Syntex Ltd. & ors........Respondents. Mr. Prakahs Naik adv. for the Petitioner. Mr. D.R. More APP for State A.S. Khan & Asso. For respondents 1 to 4. CORAM: B. R. GAVAI, J. DATED : 15th February, 2010. P.C.: 1. The learned counsel for the parties submit that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. The Consent Terms are placed on record which is signed by the parties and advocates and is marked as `X’ for identification. The learned counsel for the appellant, in view of the settlement between the parties, does not press the appeal. The appeal therefore stands disposed of in consent terms. The learned counsel for the respondent has handed over the pay order for the amount specified in consent terms to the learned counsel for the appellant. (B.R. Gavai, J.)