BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. RAJESWARAN CRL OP(MD) No.17454 of 2011 1 GANESAN 2 KARUPPU @ KARUPPASAMY ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.3&4 Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C.S.C.I.D. POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL , DINDIGUL DISTRCIT IN CRIME NO. 618 OF 2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.V.JAGANATHAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.C.RAMESH,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 read with 7(1)(a) (ii) of EC Act 1955 in Crime No.618 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police. They have approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Heard Mr.R.V.Jeganathan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit in his argument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. It is also submitted that the co-accused, namely, A1, A2 and A5, who transported the PDS rice, have already been released on bail by the lower Court. 4. The learned learned Additional Public Prosecutor would oppose the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, he would submit that co-accused have already been released on bail by the trial Court. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the co-accused, who have transported the PDS rice, have already been granted bail, this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ court is constrained to grant anticipatory bail to this petitioners also. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the Judicial Magistrate concerned on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul, and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the Court concerned every day at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 28/12/2011 / TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, DINGIDUL 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE C.S.C.I.D. P.S, DINDIGUL , DINDIGUL DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S.P.MURUGAPPAN, Advocate SR.No.46138 rl/6c – 29.12.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17454 of 2011 Date :28/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/