IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.02.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.NO.33638 OF 2006 P.Muthusamy .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Secretary to Government, Technical Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9. 2.The Director of Technical Education, Guindy, Chennai-25. .. Respondents PRAYER : Original Application No.10333 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, praying to call for the records on the file of the second respondent in connection with the order passed by him in his proceedings Memo. No.105894/B1/97 dated 2.1.1998 and quash the same and direct the respondents to pay the applicant the scale of pay of Rs.3700-5700 with effect from 30.4.1980 by designating him as Head of Department with all monetary and service benefits at the rate of 18% interest per annum and costs. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Singaravelan For Respondents : Mr.B.Vijay, Government Advocate. O R D E R Original Application No.10333 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, praying to call for the records on the file of the second respondent in connection with the order passed by him in his proceedings Memo. No.105894/B1/97 dated 2.1.1998 and quash the same and direct the respondents to pay the applicant the scale of pay of Rs.3700-5700 with effect from 30.4.1980 by designating him as Head of Department with all https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ monetary and service benefits at the rate of 18% interest per annum and costs. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. 2.At the time of filing the original application in the year 1998, the petitioner was aged about 55 years. He was serving as Senior Lecturer. The learned counsel for the petitioner now states that the petitioner is entitled to selection grade and special grade scale of pay and he relies upon several Government Orders and the recommendation of the second respondent Director of Technical Education, dated 2.1.1998. In the impugned proceeding of the second respondent, it is stated that the matter is under consideration with the Government. It is not clear as to whether the Government has taken a final decision in this matter one way or other. In view of the above, the petitioner is given liberty to make further representation to the first respondent and such representation shall be considered and disposed of on merits within three months from the date of receipt of such representation. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar vsm To 1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Technical Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9. 2.The Director of Technical Education, Guindy, Chennai-25. +1cc to Mr.R.Singaravelan,Advocate Sr 8315 +1cc to Govt.Pleader Sr 8336 JP(CO) km/26.2. W.P. NO.33638 of 2006 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/