IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16655 of 2010 MAHESH SHARMA S/O RAM PRASAD SHARMA. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.14847 of 2010 RAHUL KUMAR S/O SHRI SHIV PUJAN SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6. 06.05.2011 Heard learned counsel Sri Rajendra Singh Shastri and Sri Akshay Lal Pandit for the petitioners and Sri Gopesh Kumar learned counsel for the Union of India appeared with counter affidavit. Forged withdrawal is the allegation which is totally denied on the ground that so called victims withdrawn their amount by giving their thumb impression on withdrawal form so without comparison of the alleged thumb impression over withdrawal form with genuine/real, there can be no rejection of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of their arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 29 of 2010, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Ibrar/- ( Mandhata Singh, J.)