^. Singie Bench IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR IC.6.} W.P. (S) N0. ^us^ /2011 PETITIONER , ^^ ff^:< ^•^y ..;<0- ^y ^...••"\^ \' >?-- ^v ,..-\^ /,%'* .** .^y ..A®' RESPONDENTS ^* Lakhan Lal Sharma, aged about 55 years, S/o Shri Madan Lal Sharma, Head Master, Govemment 6irls Middle School bagori, Block Bilh'a, Distt. Bilaspur (C.6.) VERSUS 1. "^ State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 2. TheDirector Public Instructions Raipur (C.6.) 3.'' bistrict Education Officer, Bilaspur, bistrict-Bilaspur (C.6.) 4. Block Education Officer Bilha, District- Bilaspur (C.6.) 5. Joint Oirector, Treasury, Account Pension, Bilaspur, (C.6.) WRIT PETETEON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTCTUION OF INMA •^ HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILJS^PUR SB : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICB PRITINKER DIWAKER -P.SS). i'3ll^3^?/rt?fi^iVW 'i S.S. S, S.^SV&StS^. Versus Lakhaii Lal Sharma State of Chliartisgarh Ottiers Shri K.S.Pawar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.NaIia Roy, P.L. for the State. Grievance of fhe petitioner in. the present petition is that tlie petitioner was appoiated as Assistaat Teacher/Tramee on a fixed pay scale of Rs. 100-150 aad after coinpletion of probation, he was ;raiited regiUar pay scale of Rs. 169-300. Contention of the couiisel ibr the petitioner is fhat he is entifled for regular pay scale witli efFect froia fiie date /of iaitial appom.tmea.t aiid his case is squarely coveied wifti nziniber of decisions passed by this Court and slso fhe iudainent rendered bv tiie M.P. STate AdiniGistra.tive Tribunal, Jabalpur ia O^d. No. 274S/S9 ^BSEldhutetUtt YevS.u. & 56 OtHers Vs. State ofM.P. &, Ofefeersjwhere ic it has been held that sicrularly placed teachers are entitied for regular pay scale from. the date of fheir iaitial apooiiituient. !t is not disputed by bofh the parties fhat the in.att.er was taken up by the State to the Apex Court but fhe appeal was aiso disiaissed bv fhe Apex Court upholdillg the decision of tlie Tribuaal to the effect fhat tlie Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entitled for regular pay scale froia liie date of tiieir iriitial appoiatnient. In view of the above subinission inade bv the counsel for the parties, the petitioa is disposed of ia fae same tenas i.e. fhe petitioner is grazited liberty to inake a representation, if so advised, in 1 ^'..^^h. ^..'' if &...-,,*. 1 ;.i "%^^ ^"^••s^ ^ H 'Ss'il'VvSs, S "^^^" '<!s--..V^Se '!-S^<KT'S^.-°- fhe light of fhe aforesaid judginent aad ftie circular dated 5.1.2011 (Aruiexure P/2) and in tum, tb.e conceraed respondent is directed to consider their case on its own laerits and ui its perspective. If fhe petittoner staads on fbe same footuig as per order pa.ssed by fbe State Admin.istrative TribuD.al in Mad&ukaat Yadu (supra) and subsequenfly confinned by fhe S'upreis.e Court. in Special Leave Petition (Civil) N0. 6892/93 by order dated 03.01.95, the petitioner inav be entitled to saine relief accordiuglv. It is expected froui the State autiiorits.es to pass siu.table order after due scrutuiv of fhe facts. It is m.ade clear fhat fhis court has not expressed any opiaioa on thfi xn.erits of the case aad th.e autliorily concem.ed wo'iiid be at Hbert^" to decide ftie representation strictiy ui accordance witb. law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker - .Judge