IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.155 of 2008 1. Anil Kumar Roy, son of Late Ram Pratap Roy, resident of Village and P.O. Arjunpur, District Bhojpur(Arrah). 2. Binod Kumar Pandey, son of Shri Janardhan Pandey, resident of Mohalla + P.O. Civil Line Buxar, P.S. and Distt. Buxar. 3. Bipin Bihari Pathak, son of Sri Banarsi Pathak, resident of Village Jaso, P.O. and District Buxar. 4. Upendra Nath Pathak, son of Sri Sudarshan Pathak, resident of Village Jaso, P.O. and Distt. Buxar. 5. Sunil Kumar Singh, son of Sri Rama Shankar Singh, resident of Village and P.O. Majharia, Distt. Buxar. 6. Santosh Kumar Roy, son of Late Ganga Sagar Roy, resident of Village and P.O. Rampur, Distt. Buxar. 7. Rajeev Kumar Srivastava, son of Sri Shankar Deyal Srivastava, resident of Mohalla Charitarvan, P.O. and Distt. Buxar. 8. Krishna Nand Roy, son of Kashi Nath Roy, resident of Village and P.O. Kamarpur, Distt. Buxar. 9. Madan Roy, son of Sri Babu Nand Roy, resident of Village & P.O. Kamarpur, Distt. Buxar. ---Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Dr. Anirudh Mishra, Director-cum-Deputy Secretary (Desi Chikitsha), Bihar, Patna. ---Opp.Parties ----------- 5. 16.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. No one appears on behalf of the State. However, a show cause followed by a supplementary show cause have been filed. With the supplementary show cause, the order, as contained in Memo No.1050 dated 16.11.2009, has been annexed, which was passed on the representation of the petitioners. In this view of the matter, since the order has been complied with, this contempt application need not proceed further. 2 The same, accordingly, stands disposed of. However, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the aforesaid order is not correct in law and as such the petitioner proposes to assail the same in an appropriate proceeding. The petitioners will be at liberty to do so. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)