Civil Revision No. 421 of 2010(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 421 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: January 22 , 2010 Gurcharan Singh ...... Petitioner Versus Parmod Kumar and anothr ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.H.S.Diwana, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. This petition has been filed against the order dated 12.9.2009 whereby the application of the petitioner to examine handwriting expert in respect of some tampering in the receipt has been declined by the trial Court. Learned counsel has himself argued that the receipt is the sheet- anchor of the case of the respondent-plaintiff. It is also not disputed that earlier evidence of the petitioner had been closed and he had approached this court by way of CR No. 511 of 2008 and by order dated 28.1.2008 he was allowed one effective opportunity for leading his entire evidence and that consequently he did examine three witnesses on 20.3.2008 and thereafter closed his evidence. For the petitioner to now claim that he has Civil Revision No. 421 of 2010(O&M) 2 noticed some alleged alterations and tampering in the receipt ( which was the cause of this dispute) does not seem credible. Learned counsel has not been able to persuade me that the impugned order suffers from such material irregularities as to merit interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Consequently this revision is dismissed. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE January 22 , 2010 sunita