THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.11766 OF 2002 Dated 31st December, 2009 Between: Subhash Kumar …Petitioner And The State of Andhra Praesh rep. By Its Secretary and eight others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: None appeared Counsel for respondents 1 to 4: None appeared Counsel for respondents 5 to 9: Sri T.C.D.Sekhar for Sri P.Venu Gopal The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “The petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleaded to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus:- (a) to declare the action of respondent No.2 in manipulating the revenue records in respect of the property/land to an extent of Acs.6.15 guntas in Survey No.15/1, situated at Hydershahkote Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary, bad in law and without any lawful activity. (b) To declare the inaction on the part of respondent No.4 to initiate action on the representation of the petitioner dated 03.05.2002 by effecting requisite changes in the said revenue records thereby removing the illegality and restoring the position of the revenue records to its originality as illegal and suffers from malafide, improper motive and ill- will. (c) To declare the inaction on the part of respondents 2 and 3 in not initiating any action on the representation of the petitioner dated 03.05.2002 is unlawful and prejudicial to the legitimate right of the petitioner and (d) Consequently direct respondents 1 to 3 to order an enquiry into illegalities of manipulation of revenue records committed by respondent No.4 in connivance and collusion with respondents 5 to 9 by initiating act on the representation of the petitioner dated 03.05.2002. (e) Direct respondent No.4 to correct the revenue records in respect of the property/land to an extent of Acs.6.15 guntas in Survey No.15/1 situated at Hydershahkote, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District by correctly inserting the original true name of the pattadar as M/s Joharilal and Company wherever it is manipulated as ‘Joharilal’.” On 29.12.2009, there was no representation for the petitioner both in the forenoon and again in the afternoon. Therefore, the case was adjourned to 30.12.2009 to be posted under the caption “for dismissal”. On 30.12.2009 also there was no appearance for the petitioner. The case was, therefore, adjourned for today. Even today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, it is reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his case. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 31st December, 2009 vrn