IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION (S/B) No. 227 of 2008 J.S. Nayal ………………Petitioner. Versus Union of India and others ……..Respondents. Present: Mr. I.D. Paliwal, Advocate for the petitioner. None for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Advocate for respondent no. 3. Ms. Beena Pande, Advocate for respondent no. 4. Date of Decision : 8.7.2010 Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that he has been instructed by the petitioner not to press this Writ Petition. It is, accordingly, submitted that the instant Writ Petition be disposed of as not pressed. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents, state that they have no objection, if the prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner is accepted. 3. In view of the above, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of as not pressed. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 08.07.2010 Rathour