BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Sixteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16493 of 2011 MUTHURAJ ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED 2 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NESAMONY NAGAR POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DT CR NO. 976/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. N.S.RAMAKRISHNA DASS Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S. DURAIPANDIAN,ADDITIONAL PUBLIC POROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323, and 506 (ii) I.P.C., in Crime No.976 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Heard Mr.N.S.Ramakrishna Dass, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and no prejudice would be caused to the prosecution in the event of the petitioner release on anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagercoil and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 16/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, NAGERCOIL 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMAR AT NAGERCOIL 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NESAMONY NAGAR POLICE STATION,KANYAKUMARI DT 1. CC to M/S. N.S.RAMAKRISHNA DASS Advocate SR.No.44031: DM::2011:DECEMBER:19:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16493 of 2011 2P:6C:: Date :16/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/