IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3271 of 2008 SHIVJEE SINGH, son of Late Nanhaku Singh, resident of village- Kapasiya, Police Station-Rajpur, District-Rohtas(at Sasaram). …….Petitioner Versus 1. The State Bank Of India through its Regional Manager at Patna. 2. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Sasaram Branch, District- Rohtas. ……..Respondents. ----------- 03. 06.01.2010 After many rounds of exchange of pleadings and disputes with regard to payment of the loan amount which were sanctioned to the petitioner for purchase of a tractor, today the petitioner produces before the Court a so called affidavit duly filed in by the Bank which has been forwarded to the petitioner which indicates that the total outstanding against him as on 29.02.2008 was Rs. 1,62,678/-. He has been granted 25% rebate under New Debt Relief Scheme which works out to RS. 40,666/-. In other words, a final figure of Rs. 1,21,992/- has been indicated to him but then the said form does not carry any stamp or signature of the Branch in question. From the scheme, it is apparent that the amount after the rebate had to be deposited in three installments and the debts indicated therein are reflected but it is also a fact that the Government of India has extended this period of relief up to 31st of January, 2010. If that be so, then petitioner is given liberty to 2 approach the Branch immediately along with the communication received by him and the Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Sasaram Branch shall sit down with the petitioner, work out the final figure and the petitioner work out the ways and means of liquidating the liability in terms of the Debt Relief Scheme by 31st of January, 2010. The writ application is disposed off with the above directions. Shageer (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)