IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29594 of 2011 1. Ashok Yadav, son of late Dashrath Yadav 2. Beyash Yadav alias Beyash Prasad, son of Ambika Yadav 3. Shyam Sunder Mahto, son of Late Visheshwar Yadav, All resident of village – Ingunatar, P.S. – Sirdalla, District – Nawada (Bihar). ------ Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ---Opposite Party ****** 03/- 26.09.2011 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioners. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The two petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 174/2010, for the offences under Sections 384 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case. Initially on the complaint filed by Kalawati Devi, Bachchi Devi and Babli Devi for taking away some benefits awarded to them under Indira Awas Yojana. Submission is that on the basis of similar complaint two cases were instituted one Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 19/2011 and another was present one. In both the cases, the aggrieved have entered into compromise and accordingly due applications have been filed. If it is so, and the three aggrieved appearing before the court below supporting the factum of compromise with their free-will and consent without any coercion and any adult male member of their family preferably husband or son stood as one of the bailors, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above- named petitioner nos. 1 and 2 namely, Ashok Yadav and Beyash Yadav alias Beyash Prasad, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 174/2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)