IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.313 of 2010 Date of Decision: February 04, 2010 Satgur Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) This petition is directed against Order dated 11.1.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Sunam. Application filed by petitioner, Satgur Singh, under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for proving certain orders/ judgments of the Court, has been dismissed. The application has been dismissed on the ground that Satgur Singh has no relation with the case as he is neither the complainant nor a witness. The other ground taken for dismissing the application is that on 29.7.2008, last opportunity was granted to the prosecution Crl. Revision No.313 of 2010 [2] to lead evidence on 9.9.2008. Again yet another opportunity was given for 26.9.2008. The prosecution failed to conclude its evidence despite a number of opportunities including last opportunities having been given. Statement of accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. was recorded on 4.10.2008. Accused have already produced six witnesses in their defence. After the accused had disclosed their defence, the prosecution so as to fill in the lacuna, filed the application for bringing the documents on record. The evidence was well within the knowledge of the prosecution from the very beginning. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to dispute the facts given above. No ground for interference in revisional jurisdiction is made out. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) February 04, 2010 JUDGE avin