IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital the 14th day of January 2004 Crl. Bail Application No. 37 of 2004 Order on the Bail Application CRIMINAL SIDE Jitendra Tharu S/o Sri Pratap Singh R/o Village Sripur Bichua P.S. Khatima District Udham Singh Nagar .….. Applicant. Vs. State of Uttaranchal. ..…. Opposite Party Crime No. 262 of 2003. Under Sections 302, 201, 328, 34 IPC P.S. Khatima District Udham Singh Nagar By the court Hon,ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Sri Jagjit Singh Virk learned counsel for the accused/applicant and learned A.G.A. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the co-accused Smt. Roopwati has been granted to bail by this court vide order dated 5.11.2003 and he has also argued that there is no direct evidence against the applicant. Considering the case of Jitendra Tharu as well, I find that the case of Shankar Lal is also similar to the co-accused Smt. Roopmati. Let the applicant Jitendra Tharu be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Udham Singh Nagar. Dated 14.1.2004 (Rajesh Tandon, J.) Rawat