IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3442 of 2011 NIRANJAN SHARMA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 02.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The subsequent grant of anticipatory bail to co- accused, when it does not appear from the order that the earlier rejection of the anticipatory bail of the petitioner was brought to the attention of the Court, the Court does not consider the same to be a sufficient ground to reconsider the prayer for anticipatory bail. The application is disposed off with the observation that, if the petitioner files an application for regular bail, it is required to be considered on its own merit in accordance with law when the subsequent grant of anticipatory bail to co-accused has necessarily to be kept in mind also. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)