IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.18230 of 2009 DR.JAIDEV JHA Versus THE V.C.,L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSIT with CWJC No.18248 of 2009 PROF.DR.SHYAM NARAIN THAKUR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS with CWJC No.18320 of 2009 PROF.GAJADHAR PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 23. 12. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State as also the Respondent-University. The grievances of the petitioners are with regard to payment retiral dues of the petitioners as highlighted in the writ applications. It is submitted that despite several approaches, grievances of the petitioners remained unrdressed. Mr. Santosh Kumar Jha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the University submits that in case petitioners file their representation separately stating details of their claims, the same shall be considered as per law without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for expeditious of their grievances, petitioners propose to file their separate representations before Respondent No. 2. In case, such representations are filed along with relevant documents in support of their claims as also certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks from today, 2 Respondent No. 2 shall consider and dispose of their grievances as raised in their representations in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations, so that grievances could be settled without delay and admissible admitted dues could also be paid to the petitioners with statutory interest. With the above observations/directions, the writ applications stands disposed of. m.p. ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J. )