IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 9296 OF 2009 DATE OF DECISION: July 02, 2009. Parties Name Jaskaran Singh ...PETITIONER VERSUS Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate, for the respondent . JASBIR SINGH, J. (oral) ORDER: CM No.10523 of 2009: CM application is allowed and written-statement on behalf of respondent No. 1 is taken on record. CWP No. 9296 of 2009: By filing this writ petition, petitioner prays that directions be issued to the respondents to call him for interview, for allotment of Liquified Petroleum Gas distributorship. On June 17, 2009, when notice of motion was issued, following order was passed by this Court: “Notice of motion. 02.07.2009. The averment is that though the certified copies of the required documentation had been forwarded to the Competent Authority, the originals thereof got destroyed in a flood. The petitioner be interviewed provisionally, subject to his producing the originals within 7 days from tomorrow. To CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 9296 OF 2009 -2- enable the petitioner to obtain the duplicate documentation, the respondents shall make available to him the photocopies of the documentation, which he had enclosed with the application. His mere participation in the interview shall not, at all, confer any right upon him to claim eligibility. It will be the own responsibility of the petitioner to obtain authorized duplicate documentation in conformity with the requirements indicated in the advertisement. On the non-furnishing of that authorized duplicate documentation within 7 days from tomorrow, the petitioner shall cease to have any claim whatsoever on the basis of the provisional interview. Copy of the order be given to the learned counsel for the petitioner under the signatures of the Special Secretary.” Counsel for the respondent – Corporation has brought it to the notice of the Court that consequent to the order, referred to above, petitioner was interviewed and as per result prepared, he has failed to qualify to get LPG distributorship. In view of above said fact, this writ petition has become infructuous and the same is disposed of accordingly. However, liberty will remain with the petitioner to lay challenge to the allotment of distributorship in question, if so advised. July 02, 2009. ( Jasbir Singh ) DKC Judge