IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18685 of 2011 RAVINDRA YADAV & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.6.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in Complaint case No. 2403 of 2010 under the allegation that he induced the complainant to allow him to take his motorcycle on account of being family terms but did not return the motorcycle. The contention was that there was some transaction between the parties and the complainant was due to pay Rs. 47,200/- to the petitioner which was never paid and instead he filed a false complaint case. It was contended that it might be debatable that the offence under which the petitioners have been summoned could be constituted. Considering the contention and the defence and the dispute on the constitution of the offence, let the petitioners, namely, Ravindra Yadav and Amarnath Yadav be directed to be released, either in the event of their arrest by the police or surrender before the court below, on furnishing bonds each of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in the above noted complaint case , subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.) .