1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH , SHIMLA Cr. Revision No.: 134 of 2004 Decided on: 11.7.2008 Dharam Singh Petitioner Versus Smt. Jamuna Devi Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh, J. Whether approved for reporting ? No. For the petitioner: Mr.G.D.Verma, Senior Advocate. with Mr. Romesh Verma, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate. Surinder Singh.J. (Oral) The present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner-husband against the order dated 19th May,2004 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghumarwin District Bilaspur whereby the objection petition in execution petition filed by the petitioner herein was dismissed. In brief, the facts giving rise to the present petition are: that the respondent-wife was awarded the maintenance. She filed an execution petition to realize the amount of Rs.1,500/- as arrears of maintenance and Rs.200/- as execution expenses. In response to that the petitioner-husband filed objection that in the Civil Suit No.321/1 of 1991 titled as Jamna Devi vs Dharam Singh and others a compromise decree was passed on 12.9.1992, copy of which is placed on record as Annexure P-3 which was not disputed. A perusal of this document shows that in lieu of maintenance, the 2 petitioner-husband has admitted the respondent herein to be the owner in possession of the land measuring 5 bighas comprised in Khata Khatauni No.29/29 Khasra No.42 and besides this the petitioner-husband agreed to hand over the possession of the room and a kitchen in the ground and first floor respectively of the existing house. Against this background, the respondent-wife relinquished her right of present and future maintenance. Learned trial court dismissed the objection petition and proceeded with the execution proceedings, vide its order dated 19.5.2004 which has been assailed in this revision. The compromise decree is not disputed by the respondent, whereby she got substantial landed property and the accommodation in the house as aforesaid in lieu of maintenance. In view of the compromise decree, the impugned order is set aside and the execution petition filed by the respondent-wife is dismissed. July 11, 2008 (Surinder Singh),J. (D)