W5. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) N0. 1789 of 2005 PETITIONERS : 1. Suresh Kumar Shukla, S/o Slni Ramjivan Shukla, Aged 37 years, in the Education Department, Primaxy School, Amakoni, At 8L Post Utkhar, Tah. Sarangarh, Distn'ct- Raigarh (MP) (Now C.G.). 2. Ravishankar Swamakar Shukla, S/o Doulatmm Swamakar, aged 34 years, in, the Edn. Department, Middle School Nagar Palika, Sarangarh, R/o Gandhimarg, Smngarh, Dishict—Raigarh (C.G.). 3. Gopal Prasad Shrivas S/o Shri Sahebram Srivas, Aged 3S ycam. Ramlal Bhumijan, S/o Bhanu Singh, aged about 38 years. Bhuwaneshwar Ratre S/o Hetram, aged 38 years. Ramlal Maitri, S/o Gopal Singh Maitri, Aged 40 years. Din Dayal Mehar, S/o Shri Hetram Mehar, aged 38 years. Pyarelal Sahu, S/o S.P. Sahu. aged 36 years. Dwarika Nath Dubey, S/o Shn' Balmukund Dubey, aged 36 years. 10. Pradeep Kumar Dubey, S/o Nilkanth Dubey, aged 38 years. 11.Laxmi Prasad Patel, S/o Maneay Patel, aged 37 years. 12. Onkarlal Patel, S/o Nageshwar Prasad Patel, aged 38 years. 13. Sukhram Khulme, S/o Sh. Bhoduram Khunte, aged 38 years. 14.Shyamlal Chouhan, Sfo Sh. Sadashiv Chouhan, aged 35 yeam. 15.Gopal Prasad Gaygwal S/o Kusuvaram, aged 38 years. 16. Chandrika Prasad Maitri, Sfo Ghariyaram Maitri, aged 46 years. 17.Chandrabhau Jaiswal S/o Bhagavdhisa Jaiswal, aged 38 years. 18. Antram Jangde, S/o Patiram Jangde, aged 35 years. 19. Harekrishna Banjare, S/o Puranlal, aged 34 years. 20. Khem Lal Bhayti, S/‘o Choteram Bharti, aged 37 years. 21.Mayaram Chandram, S/o Hetram Chandram, aged 37 years. , 22. Babulal Patel; S/o CL. Patel, aged 34 years. 23. Mithafam Sahu, S/o Dayaram Sahu, aged 36 years. 24. Vishnucharan Patel, S/o Govindram Patel, aged 34 years. 25. Hiradhar Sidar, S/o S.G. Sidar, aged 38 years. 26. Gajanand Sidar, S/o Ram Charan Sidar, aged 38 years. 27. Puroshatam Basant, S/o Jagtu Basant, aged 3S years. 28. Ramnarayan Ramesh, S/o B. Ratnesh, aged 39 years. 29.Bhojkumar Mehar S/o BR. Mehar, aged 35 years. 30. Rohit Kumar Vanna, S/o Govardhau Singh Venna, aged 36 years. 31.G0pal Singh Pradhan, S/o Mohanlal Pradhan, aged 34 years. 32.Ganda Singh Sidar, S/o aged 36 years. 33. Shiv Prasad Chandram, S/o B.R. Chandrarn, aged 36 years. pooqcxem. / 6% 34. Smt. A&oj Bano Khan, W/o Janab Maklml Ahmed Khan, aged 35 years. 35.Ramgopal Chandram S./o aged 36 years. 36. Vinay Ram Jangde, S/o Hariram Jangde, aged 38 yeam. 37.B11uwaneshwar Gopal, Sio Lam'lan Pd. Gopal, agad 35 years. 38.Smt. Kirtilata Swamakar, W/c Gopal Prasad Swamakar, aged 38 ycam. 39.Smt. Bharti Chouhan Wk) Bharti Chouhan, aged 37 years. 40.Chetan S'mgh Patel, S/o Kunjram Patel, aged 36 yearg. 41.Ra1:anlal Chouhan, Wk) Mohanlal Chouhan, aged 40 years. 42.Raghunath Prasad Sidar, S/o HS. Sidax, aged 36 years. 43.Rohit Kumar Patel, S/o Samatlal Patel, aged 37 years. All the above petitioners from 1 to 43 are Teachers in the Education Department of Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (MP). VERSUS RES?0NDENTS . The State of Mmmya Pradesh—through the Secretary to the School Education Deparkment, Govt. of M.P. Bhopal. (Now 0G) 2. The Director, Public Instructions, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal. 3. The Joint Director, Fubie Insmletions, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur. 4. Deputy Director of Education, Raigarh Divn. Raigarh. (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) SB: Hon'hle Mr. Salish K. A ' J. Present : Shri Vipin Punjabi, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. H ORAL ORDER (Passed on 4m ofJannary, 2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that he does not want to press this petition on merit. However, the petitioners seek liberty to file representation. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 11.12.2006. The petitioners pray for the same order, to which learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection. Cw 3. The petition is accordingly disposed of in the following terms:- "the petitioner is allowed to make a representation within a period of two weeks Eom today to respondent No. 1, raising all his g‘ievances and, in tum, respondent No.1 shall decide the said representation in an objective manner within a period of 3O days &om the date of receipt of such representation, aiter considering all the points raised by the petitioner and taking into account the order dated 31012000 passed by the leamed State Administrative Tribunal in Original Application No. 1452f1998." / Sdl- Sau'sh K' Wom Judge