IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3903 of 2011 Dijendra Kumar @ Dijendra Yadav, son of Kusheshwar Yadav ------ Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar --Opposite Party ***** 10. 22.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 233C/2009 for offences under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of D.P. Act. The two supplementary affidavits have been filed on behalf of the petitioner. None appeared on behalf of the complainant opposite party no. 2 in spite of notices issued by both the means. Submission is that petitioner had to file one matrimonial case no. 03/2009 before Principal Judge, Family Court, Madhepura, under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking dissolution of marriage and decree of divorce on the grounds mentioned therein. However, the parties have filed compromise petition before the court below, but it is yet to be filed before Principal Judge, Family Court in matrimonial case in spite of appearance of complainant opposite party no. 2 therein. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of complainant appearing before the court below on due identification supports factum of filing of compromise, and in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Complaint Case No. 233C/2009, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)