IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 4255 of 2006 Between: Lateef Mohammad Khan S/o Gulam Mohammad Khan Secretary, Civil Liberties Monitaring Committee (CLMC) R/o 2-3-48/A/9 quadribagh, Amberpet, Hyderabad A.P., ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Director General Of Police State of Andhra Pradesh Lakadikapool, hyderabad 2 The Commissionerof Police Basheerbagh, Hyderabad 3 The Commissioner of Police Cyberabad Commissionarate Lakadi-ka-pool, Hyderabd 4 The Superintendent of Police Mahabubnagar District, Mahabubnagar Distrct, Mahabubnagar 5 the Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar Distrct, Karimnagar 6 The Station House Officer Amberpet P.S., Hyderabad 7 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, East Zone Hyderabad 8 The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by Principle Secrtary (HOme) Secretariat, State of A.P., Hyderabad .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction moreparticularly one inthe nature of WRit of Mandamus declringthe action of the Respondents in not providing any protection to petitioner life and liberty despite petitioner complaints and representations wit regard to the petitioner on the repeated anonymous threatening calls and death Warnings received by the petitioners as arbitrary illegal and unlawful apart frombeing violative ofthe Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the constitution of India consequently direct the respondnets to provide protection to the petitioner and hisfamily in view or repreated death warnings andto continue petitioner legitimate civil rights activities and further direct the Respondnets to take appropriate action onpetitioner complaint as per law against the threatening callers by tracing them and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem ﬁt and properinthe facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.D.SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 4255 of 2006 Oral Order: None for the petitioner. No representation either. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default. . No costs ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 01-08-2008 pvks