-F XI-HG—78 37T^T ^T f<^ich '^T8n ^TT^T s»i^icft ^^T ^ii^Kn^, ^ti1<ri4i(o, f®i<ni^i^< *11H<tT ^»Wc»» ^ 200 37T^?I1q^)' ( ^I^^) ^<TTW?Tf^T ^TT^T WritPetitio Writ Petitloa under Arti PE-TiTiONBK (PlaiatifQ Ku, A| aged throui Agra^ yeai's,| uagcli^ Honiel WardJ Munic Muiiic Ralsa^ Goveri CoUecl (MP) t| By yi^ Rt.-atf1 IB: RESFOKDENT^ {Dcfciidaiit No. 1) V^y^il^ 1. 2. 11.07.2008 Shri R. S, Bagliel, counsl SiiriA.S, Kachhawaha,. | Heard. By this petitiDH,-:under^ petitioner has iinpugned Uie passed by leanied 3rd Civill application of the petitioner fo| From perusal ofme plaij tliat apai-t. from other prayers| [^i411 *ii^<vff ^f f^ '^3tRm37T^?T 1 mo. ;le 22T of CoiistitiitloB of iiti Agrawal (Muior), D/o Anup Agrawal, about 5 yeai's, Occupatioii- Stiideut, ;h- her guaj:dia-ii & mother Smt, Sliyaoia Eil, W/o Aiiup Agra-w^J., a.ged s-bout 28 Occiipau.ou-noti^e wife, R/o Neai h Basu Groceiy Store, Sai Nurisng L»^jie> R^iiilils. K4oicl9Lii> B^ilcuiit.DUi' Raigarh, Tahsil & Distt. Raiga^ii (CG) irpal uorporaaon, Kaigani tnrougii -umct jipal Officer, Municipal Corporatioii •h (M.P.) imeut of Madhya Pradesh, through fcor Raigai4!, Ofiice of CoUector, Raigai'h otii R/'o Talisil & Distt. Raigai-h (CG) txie of M.P. Re-Organizatioii Act, 2000 3fC,G, Instead ofState ofM.P, !RA el for the petitioner, Jy, Advocate LTerierai lor tlie ^tate, rticle 227 oftlie Constitiition ofinclia, the ^rder of Annexzire P-5, dated 25,3.2008, Judge Class-11, Kaigarh, whereby tJie ainendiag the plamf has been rejected. nt aunexed with this petitioii, it is evident , tiie petitioncr/piaiiltm lias also praA7ecl XI-HC—78 ^n^r ^r f<-ii°h TT8H 3TT^?T so^icti T 'TSf ^|q|<n^ ^tll-^^Ko, [s|<nH^< <n^<tT a»*ii<*» ^ 200 ^?T Tf^7 ((ic<fl<sl<^) '^RHW^f^? 3:n^r .^.- constiticuon ameudijient tanlk tor demolinon ot' Uie By the application of mcorporate pleadm.gs to the constnictiou of overiiead taiiK ui qtiestioii slioulu easementaiy nglit ot tiiorougJ buice tiie reLiel/ claiil a^iienctHieiit, lias aireaay De( plaiiit, I ain of the cousidert uijustice is likely to be cai^ application for aineudment. In tlie resiilt, tlie petitKl be dismissed aiid is accordiiiit commenced atter 30m May 2000. i^ient, the petitioner/plaiiitiff has sought to ^llect tliat ciuniig penclency ol tlie suit, tiie lias been completed aiid tlierefore, fiie >e demolished iii order to restore Uie ilare ol tiie petitioiier, by the petitioner by tlie proposed ;n claioied ui tlie origiiial prayer of tlie ^d opmion that 110 prejudice or maaifest |sed to the petitiouer by rejection of his claiitiea <^i^f<n<j1'f WR^ff ^ ftTst ^^K '^^rfRFTST^T 'n iias no substmice, Uie sanie cieseryes to ^ly dismissed. | Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge