IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1159 of 2011 SUDHANSHU KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a compliant case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A and 494 of the I.P.C. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that initially the complaint was filed by the complainant on 03.02.2009 which was dismissed on 15.06.2009. Thereafter, the complainant filed divorce case no. 09 of 2009 in which the order dated 29.03.2010 reflects that both sides agreed to resume conjugal life. Now the present complaint has been filed on 16.07.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that reconciliation at this stage appears to be impossibility. Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay Rs.2000/-(Two Thousand) from first week of every month from March, 2011 to opposite party no.2 by depositing the - 2 - said amount in the account of the complainant. It is expected from the complainant that she will supply account number to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today. On the basis of the aforesaid consideration, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint Case No. 1830C of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Begusarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J)