IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.21 of 2003 Date of decision: September, 14, 2010 Bir Sain Malik .. Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. R.K. Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Haryana for the respondent. A.N. Jindal, J Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that at the time of issuing notice of accusation, the court at least should have considered the order of stay passed by this Court regarding stay of implementation of the award, because the award could not be implemented on account of the stay granted by this Court. In these circumstances, this revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial court to give a re-look to the notice after considering the order of stay dated 27.8.2001 passed by this Court. Both the parties are directed to appear before the trial court on 26.10.2010. September 14, 2010 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge