{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1932 OF 2010 1. Sangitabai w/o Bhaulal Fulmali Age-22 years, Occ-Household R/o Dawargaon, Tq-Badnapur Dist-Jalna 2. Rohidas s/o Sonaji Patthe Age-18 years, Occ-Education 3. Dhondiba Deu Patthe Age-80 years, Occ-Nil 4. Ramesh s/o Dhondiba Patthe Age-50 years, Occ-Agirculture 5. Shamrao s/o Dhondiba Patthe Age-45 years, Occ-Agriculture Respondents No.2 to 5 R/o Georai Bajar Tq-Badnapur, Dist-Jalna APPLICANTS VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra 2. The Superintendent of Police Jalna, Dist-Jalna RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. R.R.Imale, Advocate for the applicants Mr. K.S.Patil, APP for respondent State ....... [CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.] {2} DATE: 16th June 2010 PER COURT: 1. By filing the present criminal application, the applicants have prayed to release them on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in connection with CR No.57/2010 registered with Badnapur police station for an offence punishable u/s 304-B, 498-A, 323 and 504 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. It appears that during the May Vacations, on 14th May 2010, interim protection is granted to the applicants. 3. Applicant No.1 is the sister in law of deceased Radhabai, whereas the other applicants are cousins of the husband of the deceased. Perusal of the complaint shows that the said offence is registered on the complaint of father of the deceased Radhabai. It is alleged that there was demand of Rs.50,000/- from the deceased by the in laws and husband, as the husband wanted to start a shop. 4. It is stated in the complaint that Radhabai was missing from 23rd April 2010 and her dead body was found floating in a well on 24th April 2010 and hence the complaint was lodged against the relatives of the husband of the deceased. Perusal of complaint does not disclose any specific role or act {3} against respondents No.2 to 6. The applicant No.1 is the sister in law of the deceased, who was not residing with the deceased and her husband, however she is residing at a different place. As all the allegations against the present applicants are omnibus and vague in nature, the applicants are entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 5. In the result, the application is allowed. Interim protection granted to the applicants on 14th May 2010, is hereby confirmed and the same to remain in force till the filing of the charge sheet. Applicants are directed to cooperate with the investigating agency. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] drp/B10/criapln1932-10