IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 22ND KARTHIKA 1931 RP.No. 1023 of 2009(I) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.16721/2009 Dated 22/07/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN WPC ---------------------------- REMA BAI, AGED 50 YEARS, W/O.LATE KOCHU KRISHNA PILLAI GOPAKUMAR, RESIDING AT JANAKI NILAYAM, THAZHAM, CHATHANNOOR, MEENAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM, NOW RESIDING AT KRISHNA NIVAS, KOONAYIL CHERI, PARAVOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.SIVARAJ RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS IN WPC --------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHATHANNOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAVOOR, KOLLAM. 5. THANKAPPAN, S/O.NEELAKANDAN, KOCHU PATTATHIL VEEDU, THAZHAM, CHATHANNOOR, MEENAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 6. BIJU, S/O.THANKAPPAN, KOCHU PATTATHIL VEEDU, THAZHAM, CHATHANNOOR, MEENAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. 7. BINU, S/O.THANKAPPAN, KOCHU PATTATHIL VEEDU, THAZHAM, CHATHANNOOR, MEENAD VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE (R5 TO R7) BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.LAKSHMI NARAYAN. (R1 TO R4) THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN ------------------------------- R.P. No. 1023 of 2009 in W.P.(C) No.16721 of 2009 ------------------------------- Dated this the 13th November, 2009 O R D E R Raman, J. Police Protection to the life of the petitioner was granted by an interim order, dated 17.6.2009, and the writ petition was disposed of making the interim order absolute. The present review petition is filed seeking extension of the police protection order as against the properties also. It is contended that the suit instituted by the respondents was dismissed and have become final by the judgment passed in the Second Appeal, and still they are attempting to trespass into the property of the petitioner. If so, the remedy open to the petitioner is to approach the Civil Court. We do not find any ground for review. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE nj.