Civil Revision No. 1830 of 2010(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1830 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: March 18, 2010 Narinder Mohan ...... Petitioner Versus Madhu Bala and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.A.S.Gill , Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. After arguing for sometime learned counsel has stated that he would be satisfied if the petitioner is also given an opportunity to have his expert examine the signatures of Jagan Nath on the account opening form and to compare them with his signatures on the will propounded by the petitioner. By the impugned order the permission had been granted only to respondents No. 1 to 4 to examine a handwriting expert in respect of the signatures of Jagan Nath. He prays that a similar opportunity should be granted to the petitioner also to examine a handwriting expert to give his own evidence about the signatures of Jagan Nath. I find this to be a fair request. Consequently revision is dismissed with the clarification that Civil Revision No. 1830 of 2010(O&M) 2 the petitioner shall have the signatures of Jagan Nath compared with that on the account opening form by his own expert and examine the said expert in evidence. Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE March 18 , 2010 sunita