IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.18899 of 2010 Date of Decision : October 15, 2010. Madan Lal .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner has a grievance against the nomination of respondent No.4 as Member of the Market Committee, Abohar under the category of Weighman (Tola). In this regard, the petitioner has served the respondent-authorities with a legal notice dated 8.9.2010 (Annexure P-7) also but without any response thereto so far. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, however without expressing any views on the merits of the allegations, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.1 & 2 to look into the allegations/the petitioner’s claim as contained in his legal notice dated 8.9.2010 (Annexure P-7) and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order, preferably within a period of three months from C.W.P.No .18899 of 2010 2 the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. October 15, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE