~k'^^^ INTHEHIGHCOURTOFCHHAmSGARHATBILASPUR •wSn^p^mas' Q^lS-^OF_20Q4 PETITIONE: Ram Prakash Mishra;S/oLateShri R.K. Matshra, aged aboiit 47 years, Posted as Supervisor at C.G. Sanskrit Board Raipur (C.G.), VERSUS ; . .s^ 1. Stateof.Ghhattisgarh.Through Secretary,- Department 6f Panchayat and Social Welfar, D.K.S. Bhawan .Mant^alaya, Raipur (C.G.) Director Pa.nchayatAnd Social Welfare D.K.S. Bhawan Ma.ntralaya., Iteipur.fe.G.). . Secrefa.i'y,^BeRtt. Qf Schbolgitucation Governmehf of C.G: Mantralaya, D.K.S. Building; Raipur (C.G.) 4. Dire<3for,'PHblic Instructions, ' ' Pehsion Bada, Raipur (C.G.) ' WMT PEnTIONUNDER__ARTICLE 226/2270F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOiR^ISSUE QF AN APPROPRIATE WMT IN THB NATUREOF MANDAMUS/CBRTIQRARt ETC. OR DIRECnON/ORDERINTHEtlKENATURBETC. T0,:. • :.'-••„•;:,.^.', <• • .. .'•-^.11..-^ '•,:.,,,•.;.^, THE HON'BLE GHIE^ JUSTBC^^iyHIS HQN'BLE CpMPANIQN JUDGES6FTHEHON'BI^HIGH^OURTOF^<^^ AT BIIASPIJR, ^CHHATTISiSARH). ^ j XI-HC-22 3^'HTPTR'ra', i9Tn<1'16, Rtdiyy< 3ii^i "^ach ^-^IAS.e.hi\tM.(&<i..... _ *41<<MI St>*)|c»i -•—•-•-•••••*-"•••• ^pJC 200 R|<)«^ sn^rw )?:IH; 311^1 Sb*<W Ritrflg' •Sll^l 6'KIIW^fN' couilisd pFe^errcd WcUstre anlDu' 04.04.2008 On a mcntion beiag mad^ Shri Rajesh Pandey, Shri S.S. Aggrwal, Oovt. The petitioner has 226/227 of the Ctonstitution dated 9.9.2003 & 20.10.2003 has directed absoiptipa of-Qie| of Paacbayat & Social Departmeat ofEducation. The pctitioner's case is Supervisors were appoiated ia| bv xnini P.S.C. and bv fhe imlp supcmsors are bciag absoifac) arbitrarv aad unreasoimbte. Leamed couasel for the aa emptoyee of Dcpartaaent of| Class-III (Executivc) and aao him surplus. Howcvcr,vidc in|i] othcr sitaflarly sitnated peiso^ Educatton Departmient on t4< Paachayat Inspectors are lyinfe and for which the petitioncr i^ thc pctitioncr inay be allowc^ respondent No. 1 raising aU respondent No. 1 be directe^ <fti<iFci<fl'i *<i>iciTfftetA)rfSrezK ^isri^irsn^r :, fhe case is tafcen up fiw hearing. forffae petitioner. Rdvocate for the State. llus wnt petition undcr Articte |of India beu^; aggnevcd by t^e ovder t/6.11.2004 whcaeby respoindent No.3 |Siiper»teOrsworldng iu the departinent as Uppcr Diviskm Tcachcr in tfac fhat fhc petittQner atong with oflier fhe e3Eecuti»eca&ss after beiag setected pugncd orders the petitioner aad other i on a lown- post, wlrich wholty iHcgaI, otder in|ipugned Ipetituner submits fhat tiie petitKMier is |Panchayat & Social Welfaie, whfch is a tiUdate has becn issued declarmg ordcis thc pctitkmcr alos^with ts were ordered to be absorbed in the \e post U.D.T., whereas tbe posts of vacant ia the Panchayat Departcaent eMgibk. Coiiasel further subinxts that to inakc a detailcd rcprescntetion to grievances fer his coasideration and to decide the representafba of fhe hlis XI-HC-22 an^T^ R-fi+sn^r soiwyleff S)l1 /) <^. a^.< 3^ sngRpr^ ®Tflw'i6,Ridiy^i 3ii^l^?|ch *<l*4MF sniich "" •-------••••••••••• ^q- 200 •"f^6^[' sii^i 6«iiisn:n1?(T tQ •whjcfa teamed objectton. Haviag heard leamcd thc facts aad circumstaaces raised by the pctitioncr, the represcntatton to respondcnl today laasing aU his grievance^ to consider fhe represeatattoi aftBT considering aU, thc gri^ anotlicr e^ht wceks in decided the petttfoner shoulfl been reUeved. Wifh fhcabcxwdirecttai Certificd copy as pcr rupc accortlance +l<!|fd'Ifl-f WIcft'ffts^S tRlfcill ^a'ri^T.W^T counsel &r the- respoiuten.ts has ao |ounsel for the parties, hawiag regard to ^f tHc casc attd having regard to thc point petitioner is aUowed to make a detaited No.l wifhm a pcriod of 10 days from and ia tum respoadent No. 1 is directed oftfae petitioner and to decide fhe same wanccs raiscd by thc pctitioiaer wlthia with law. Tfll flic repnssentation is not be relteved, if he has not atoeady , thc petitipa stands disppsed crf. ss. Sd/- 1-.C. Bhadoo Judge ('fliy^)