IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.5466 of 2006 Between: 1. Chakali Balanna, S/o. Chakali Venkataramana, Chakali Veedhi R/o Koilakuntla Village & Mandal, Kurnool District 2 Smt. Chakali Tirupatamma W/o Chakali naganna R/o. Chakali Veedhi Koilakuntla Village & Mandal, Kurnool District ... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Mandal Revenue Officer cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Koilakuntla Mandal, Kurnool District. 2 The Deputy Director, Social Welfare Department, Kurnool 3 The State of A.P. rep. by the Chief Secretary to Govt., Secretariat, Hyderabad. (R3 is impleaded as per court order dt. 26-4-2006) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the compensation amount as per the decree passed by the Subordinate Judge, Nandyal dt 8-10-1985 in OP No.16/85 and OP No. 33/85 and confirmed by this Hon'ble Court by its order dt 19-1-1990 in A.S. 573/87 even though compensation is deposited and paid to the other claimants in the same award in the year 2000 itself, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to release the above said compensation amount forthwith. Counsel for Petitioners: Mr.K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.5466 of 2006 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in compliance of the interim order dated 26.04.2006 passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.6963 of 2006, the compensation has already been paid and, hence, no further adjudication is necessary. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________ JUSTICE G.ROHINI 21st July, 2008. IBL