THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO.316 OF 2010 Dated 22nd March, 2010 Between: Ch.Radhakrishna Murthy …Petitioner And G.Prasad …Respondent Counsel for the petitioner : Sri M.Damodar Reddy Counsel for the respondent: ---- The Court made the following ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed alleging wilful disobedience of order dated 14.02.2008 in WPMP No.2612 of 2008 in W.P.No.2050 of 2008. I have heard Sri M.Damodar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and perused the record. By the abovementioned order, this Court directed the respondent not to interfere with the petitioner’s mining activities in respect of an extent of Ac.1.00 comprised in Survey No.280/1 of Kondapally Village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Krishna District. On the ground that the respondent has been interfering with the petitioner’s mining operations, the petitioner caused a legal notice issued on 24.03.2008 to the respondent. In his reply notice given by the respondent, it is, inter alia, stated that they have not been interfering with the mining operations of the petitioner in Survey No.280/1 and that the petitioner has started carrying on mining operations in Compartment No.024 of Kondapalli Reserve Forest instead of confining himself to Survey No.280/1. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner disputed the stand taken by the respondent in the reply notice. I am afraid the dispute as to the identity of the property does not fall within the scope of the present Contempt Case. If the petitioner felt aggrieved by the stand taken by the respondent on the identity of the property, he is entitled to avail appropriate remedy for survey and demarcation of the property. No case is made out against the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order of this Court. Subject to the above observation, the Contempt Case is dismissed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 22nd March, 2010 vrn