1 CRA 922/10 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 922 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. A.S. Uraizee i/b A.S. Uraizee & Law Associates for the petitioner. Mr. R.V. Sipahimalani for respondent no.2. Ms. K.K. Soraan for respondent no.1. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 15TH DECEMBER 2010 P.C. : 1. Order of the City Civil Court allowing the chamber summons taken out by a third party for being joined as a party is impugned in this revision application. Even if the revision application were to be allowed, it would not dispose off the suit. Hence by proviso to section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure as interpreted by this Court in the case of 2 CRA 922/10 Rajabhau Mahadeorao Rahate Vs. Dinkar Shantaram Ingole, 2002(3) Mh.L.J 921, the revision application is not maintainable. The revision application is accordingly dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner wants to challenge the order and therefore prays for a limited protection for a period of 2 weeks. It is directed that the amendment may not be carried out for a period of 2 weeks from today. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)