IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31189 of 2008 MANORANJAN TIWARI . Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR . ----------- 7 8.1.2010 On 3.11.2009 when the matter was lastly heard the petitioner was asked to take his wife at the place of his working. Opposite party alleges that she was not taken by the petitioner. On the other hand the petitioner refuting the allegation states that Opposite party was not willing to go. There does not seem any chance of reconciliation between the parties. Considering the situation instead of sending the petitioner to jail, his prayer for anticipatory bail is being allowed, for the reason that in future parties may settle their dispute. However, it is made clear that petitioner will continue to deposit Rs.1500/- monthly in the account of the Opposite party, till the final order is passed in maintenance case filed by the Opposite party by the Court below. In case the petitioner will fail to deposit this amount, even for a single month, Opposite party will have liberty to file an application for cancellation of anticipatory bail. Counsel for the petitioner submits that entire arrears have been paid in the bank account of the 2 Opposite party. If that statement is wrong, that will be a cause for filing an application for cancellation of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, order of provisional anticipatory bail dated 5.1.2009 passed in favour of petitioner Manoranjan Tiwari, is confirmed, he will remain on same bail bond. A.Kumar ( Mridula Mishra, J.)