IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) I,» WRIT PE§ITION No3li7J /2d05 PETITIONER Smt. Anna Clarra Toppo Wife of Shri K. years, B. Toppo, aged about 37 Assistant Teacher, Primary. School Rangpara, Block Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). RESPONDENTS ¥ State of Chhattisgarh, Through: / The Secretary, Department (if Tribal ./ é/ / rsOgri A . Raipur k. o. 3//The Commissioner, Department of Tribal Welfare, Ambikapur, (C.Gn). 4 The ff. 5. The Block Education Officer, V Surajpur, (C.G.). Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan (C.G.). Q$jr A af" JQ \V6 awu2/The A‘Cxv“ R Commissioner, Department of Assistant Distict' Surguja Collector, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). District Surguja / / WRIT ’PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS, DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. VERSUS Tribal Welfare, Raipur'(C.G.). { / This petition has beer order of transibr dated 30.5.2 Working as Assistant Teachor School Rangpara, Block S1 Metric, Kanya Chhatravas, Re Leanied counsel for th time being, this petition may petitioner to tile a representa1 and the concerned authplitv representation within the s Court. This limited prayer is not opposed by the State counsel. r is allowed, \ petitioner may tile a detailed representation Within a period of 10 days from today before the competent authority and if competent authority shall d within a period of 1. month fr ‘said representation. Consequently, the pray: If so advised, the . f11ed,- challenging the impugned 305, by which the petitioner who is has been transferred from Primary 1rajP11r, District-Sarguja to Pre— manu]Hagal‘. e petitioner submits that for the ae disposed of with a liberty to the ion before the concerned authoritv may be directed to dispose of her tipulated' period granted by this “h ;uch a representation is tiled, the spose of the said representation )m the date of filing/ receipt of the . 21 t3 XI-HC-22 3a mum, Wm,W W a=[ 2005‘ . ............... m .......................... ...... ' mmm ‘ $M1 mh‘mmh hmuamr 29.7.2005 Shri RP. Sahu , counsel for the petitioner. Shri Akhil Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for - the State] respondents. w. ofzood w. two. 3177 :- Heard.