IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13410 of 2011 1. Sahatu Singh son of Murahu Singh 2. Madan Singh son of Ram Awatar Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 4. 25.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Chainpur P.S. case No.72 of 2010 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307, 379 of the Indian Penal Code as well as 27 of the Arms Act and 33 of the Forest Act. The petitioners are named in the First Information Report as one of the miscreants on the basis of them having been identified by the forest officials. During investigation no forest officials had directly stated that he identified the petitioners and the only material is that their names were disclosed on suspicion. Considering the same, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of 12 weeks from today in connection with Chainpur P.S. case No.72 of 2010 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also - 2 - the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v)That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )