IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45197 of 2010 BALRAM MISHRA S/O LATE SATYADEO MISHRA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.45267 of 2010 1. SHAMBHUNATH MISHRA @ SHUBHANKAR MISHRA S/O LAXMAN MISHRA 2. SUDHIR KUMAR JHA @ SUDHIR JHA S/O INDRA JHA @ INDRA NARAYAN JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, counsel for the informant and the state. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201, 120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioners are the father-in-law and brother-in-law of the deceased and they have no specific overt act alleged against them. Considering the same, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 89/2010, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors 2 will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fails to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)