HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.225 OF 2011 ORDER: The petitioner as well as the 3rd respondent are Advertising Agencies. The 3rd respondent was permitted to erect a Unipole Advertisement Board, by the Municipal Corporation. The petitioner has an authorization for erection of the Advertisement Board, from the A.P. Wakf Board as well as the Municipal Corporation in the nearby locality near Boat Club, Secunderabad. The petitioner, on the other hand, was accorded permission to erect hoardings in the land pertaining to Wakf. A dispute is pending as to the cancellation of permission accorded to the petitioner by the Municipal Corporation as well as the licence granted by the Wakf Board. The 3rd respondent sought permission from the Municipal Corporation, respondents 1 and 2 herien, to erect another hoarding to the existing Unipole. Permission was accorded through proceedings, dated 30-12-2010. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Board, which is proposed to be erected would block the visibility of their hoardings. This writ petition is filed challenging the said proceedings. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. 3. The 3rd respondent is already holding permit as well as licence from the concerned authorities to erect the hoarding. The hoarding has since been erected and the proposal made by it, is only for addition of some more space. The grievance of the petitioner is that the new board would block the visibility of their hoardings. 4. Across the Bar, it is stated that the permission in favour of the petitioner in respect of their hoardings was cancelled, and by virtue of an interim order, they are entitled to continue up to 31-03-2011. Much would depend upon the nature of orders that would emerge thereafter. The permission accorded to the 3rd respondent is not illegal or arbitrary in any way. The limited grievance of the petitioner as to the visibility of its hoardings being blocked can be taken into account by the Corporation after 31-03-2011, in the event of there being valid permission in favour of the 3rd respondent, beyond that date. 5. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J March 15, 2011. KTL