1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2415 OF 2009 Yakub Baig Trust, Panvel. ....Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Charity Commissioner & Ors. ....Respondents. Shri Rajiv Patil & Shri Sachin Punde, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri R. M. Patne, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED : 4th March, 2009. P.C. The Petitioner has challenged only part of the impugned order, whereby the authority (Assistant Charity Commissioner)while granting/sanctioning the scheme, directed the applicants to clear entire dues of amount of maintenance of the beneficiaries within the period of eight weeks from the date of the order but on or before 31st March, 2009. That operative part is based upon a statement made by the advocate for the applicant as recorded in paragraph 28 which is reproduced as under : “ At this stage only, I have to make it clear that across the Bar statement was made by the Advocate for the applicant that they will clear all the dues of the maintenance amount of the 2 beneficiaries, within the period of six weeks or after 31st of March, 2009, as they have stopped the maintenance amount, without any specific provision in the Scheme. Hence it is not necessary to criticize or comment on the acts of the Trustees at this juncture.” There is no challenge to the rest of the order. In view of the above statement, I see there is no reason to interfere now at the instance of the said Petitioner/Applicant. The Petition, is therefore, dismissed. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)