IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25960 of 2008 JHIBU PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 24.10.2008 Heard Sri B.N.Sinha ‘Suman’ Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is not named in a case under Section 395 IPC but appears being found in possession of some properties taken away in theft just after incident. The attention of the court was drawn to an order passed in Cr.Misc.Petition No.4838 of 2001 by which a similarly situated accused has been admitted to bail by a Bench of this Court. I have perused the order and I respectfully do not agree with the reasons assigned by the court. Considering that the theft articles were recovered and were identified by the informant, I am not inclined to direct the release of the above named petitioner. Petition is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )