... 1 i!l. •t. '%, HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR D.B.: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil Kumar Sjnha and Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhe Shyam Sharma Writ Appeal No.523 of 2011 Appellants Respondents versus 1. 1. Lalita Bai, W/o Chova Ram Sahu, aged about 34 years, (Respondent No.2) 2. Tulsi Bai, W/o Shri Arun Sahu, aged about 40 years, (Respondent No.3) 3. Lalita, W/o Shri Bhagwati Uike, aged about 35 years, (Respondent No.4) 4. Saroj Bai, W/o Ishwar Lal Sen, aged about 41 years, (Respondent No.5) All are R/o Village Khartuli, Tahsil & District Dhamtari (CG) Bhagiram Sahu, S/o Shri Sukhdev Sahu, aged about 47 years, R/o Village Khartuli, District Dhamtari (CG) (Petitioner) 2. Madhukanta, W/o Late Birsingh, R/o Vill. Khartuli, Tah. & Distt. Dhamtari (Respondent No.1) 3. The Tahsildar, Tahsil & District Dhamtari (CG) (Respondent No.6) 4. The Collector, Tahsil & District Dhamtari (CG) (Respondent No.7) 5. Chairman Revenue Board, Circuit Court at Raipur, District Raipur (CG) (Respondent No.8) Present: Shri Anup Majumdar, counsel for the appellants. Shri A.S.Kachhawaha, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents No.3 and 4 on advance copy. WritAppeal underSection 2(1)-ofthe Chhattisaarh Hiah Court (AepeaLto Division Bench) Act, 2006 ^. ''•^s.i^'EiK ORAL ORDER (Passed on 1st December, 2011) Per Sunil Kumar Sinha, J.: Heard. 2. Shri Anup Majumdar, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw this writ appeal with liberty to avail other remedies available to the appellarits under the law. 3. Permission granted. 4. Accordingly, the writ appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the appellants. -^^ Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge Sd/- Radhe Shyam Sharma Judge Gopal