1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 685/2008 (Rewant Nath & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 15/02/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. B.S.Rathore for the petitioners. Mr. L.R.Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Mr. Sanjay Mathur for the complainant. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State as also counsel appearing for the complainant. Perused the order impugned and challan papers. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that causing the injuries on the ribs is assigned to Hanuman Nath who is not the petitioner herein. So far as the petitioner No.1 Rewant Nath is concerned, according to learned counsel for the petitioners it is alleged that he inflicted a Gandasi blow on the skull but there is no injury by sharp edged weapon but the injury is lacerated wound which is of small dimension and simple in nature by blunt as noticed in the injury report. No specific role has been assigned to any other person. Be that as it may, from the perusal of the injury report, it appears that the injured suffered the injuries on the ribs by blunt object which has been assigned to Hanuman Nath who is not before this court. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. 2 Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Rewant Nath S/o Choukh Nath, Doongar Nath S/o Choukh Nath, Madan Nath S/o Bana Nath and Kunan Nath alias Kundan Nath S/o Bana Nath be released on bail in CR No.116/07 P.S. Sandwa, provided each of them executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP