IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9177 of 2010 TIRLOKI NATH PANDEY, S/o Srikant Pandey, R/o Village-Badhayan, P.S.-Ziradai, District-Siwan. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 02.12.2010 The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 20.10.2009 passed by Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Siwan in Siwan (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 150 of 2009 by which he has taken cognizance under Section 307 and other allied Sections. It has been contended by the petitioner that he was not named in the First Information Report nor caused the injury and his relative did not name him initially and thereafter a statement was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. wherein he named the petitioner as the third accused and, therefore, seeks quashing of the order of cognizance that the material against him is not reliable. Since this is a factual matter which can be properly appreciated only at the stage of trial, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)