IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22493 of 2010 1. MD.MAJLIS, SON OF MD.NATHUNI 2. MD. SAMSO, SON OF MD. WASIR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 13.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 376 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Submission is that only material that has transpired against the petitioners is that they had been seen on the previous night in the fields where subsequently the dead body was recovered on account of which they were suspected to be involved in the present occurrence. There is no other material against them as against the other materials which have appeared against the co-accused persons. However, at this stage, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners but the petitioners may renew their prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioners’ case shall not be bifurcated for commitment or framing of charge for the purpose of this order. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)