IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.9 of 2007 Rajeshree Parisa Wategave ..Petitioner vs. Special Recovery Officer Dr.Annasaheb Chougule Urban Cloop.Bank Ltd. and others ...Respondents (2) Writ Petition no.10 of 2007 Shri Parisa A.Wategave and others ...Petitioenr vs. Special Recovery officer Dr.Annasaheb Chougule Urban Coop.Babnk Ltd.and others Shri S.V.Sadavarte for petitioner in both petitions. Shri A.S.Desai for respondent nos.1 to 3 in both petitions. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIARI J. 5th December,2007 5th December,2007 5th December,2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Shri Sadavarte states that the amount of surcharge which is the only amount which is remaining outstanding has been quantified by the respondent no.1 Bank at Rs.86,521/- Shri Sadavarte and Shri Desai do not dispute this figure and once this amount is tendered, the first respondent Bank will issue no due certificate in favour of the petitioners in each of these petitions. Needless to state that the amount will have to be paid to the first respondent bank and the first respondent Bank would thereafter deposit the said sum or part thereof in the Government treasury. Similarly, the first respondent Bank is at liberty to withdraw the sums which have already been deposited with the joint Registrar by the petitioners. At the request of the petitioners, two months time is granted to them to pay the amount quantified above. 2. Petitions disposed of. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)