1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2500 OF 2008 Smt.Manisha Milind Kulkarni and Ors. .. Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr.V.P.Shastry for petitioners Mr.V.S.Gokhale, A.G.P. for State. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, CJ. & A.P.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 25th August 2008 P.C. . Rule. Learned Counsel for petitioner contends that vide order dated 3rd November 2007 respondent has passed an order qualshing and setting aside the order passed by the Dy.Collector and Competent Authority, Pune under Urban Land Ceiling Act (ULC Act) in case 2 No.2432-KU/2005, primarily on the ground that the ULC Act itself has been repelled and no possession of the property in question was taken keeping in view the judgements of Division Bench of this Court in case of Maredia Associates Vs. State (W.P.2572-07 (OS) and in the case of Voltas Ltd. Vs. Additional Collector, W.P.No.8356 of 2006 (AS) so also the Judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Pt.Madan Swaroop Shrotiya Public Trust Vs. State of U.P. reported in JT 2000 (3) S.C. 391. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for respondent fairly states that the possession of the land has not been taken and the judgement of this Court would squarely apply to the present case. In view of the above, it is not necessary for us to deliberate on this issue any further. We have considered the matter and are of the view that the matter is squarely covered by the aforesaid Division bench judgements as well as the 3 judgement of Apex Court. Thus, we quash the order dated 3rd November 2007. Petition is accordingly disposed of no costs. Rule is made absolute accordingly. ( CHIEF JUSTICE ) (A.P.Deshpande, J).