IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA. CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.42762 OF 2011 VIKKI KUMAR @ VIKASH SINGH, S/O MURLI SINGH @ MURLIDHAR SINGH, R/O BARADIH, P.S HILSA, DISTRICT NALANDA. …………………PETITIONER. VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR. ………………………OPPOSITE PARTY. --------------------- 02/ 14.12.2011 Heard counsel for the parties. Counsel for the petitioner would submit that due to inadvertence on the part of his Office description of village of the petitioner in the connected application being Criminal Miscellaneous No. 36089 of 2011 was wrongly mentioned as village Dhabol which should have been Village Baradih. In order to support himself to this aspect, he would refer to the description of village of the petitioner in the First Information Report, wherein, the petitioner is shown to be the resident of village Baradih. Considering the aforementioned inadvertent error on the part of the petitioner, this Court would direct to modify the description of village in the order dated 25.10.2011 passed in Criminal 2 Miscellaneous No. 36089 of 2011 and the village of the petitioner instead of Dabhol should be read as Baradih. Consequently, the other part of the order dated 25.10.2011 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 36089 of 2011, as with regard to the time of surrender of the petitioner is also extended by further period of four weeks. The order of this Court dated 25.10.2011 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 36089 of 2011 stands modified only to the aforementioned extent. That being so, this application is, accordingly, disposed of. Let a copy of this order be sent to the Court below by FAX at the cost to be deposited by the counsel for the petitioner. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)