@ _‘ $53 a ‘ S.B. {Service Matter! ‘ IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARHI WRIT PETITIONS) N0.$’7&é? /2010. PETITIONER: Rajesh Mishra son of Mandhata Prasad Mishra, aged about 37 years, Ex—ITI Apprentice, SECL, Bhatgaon, residence of Near Govind Saraswati High School, Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. Versus Resgondents 1. Coal India Limited, 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata (W.B.) Through Its Chairman. (AW/2. South Eastern Coalfields Ltdl, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, C.G. Through Its Chairman —cum—Managing Director. 3. Director, (Personal), South Eastern Coalllelds Ltd., Seepat Road, Bilaspur, co. ' 4. DylChief Personal II/Ianager (Labour), South Eastern Coalflleds Limited, Bilaspur, C.G. WRITM PETITION UNDERVARTICLE 226 OF THE eoNsTITETION OF INDIA r mwm‘ mafgam WW @W ammWq? am‘m amt S B‘ HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PRYHNKER DHNAKER 20-10-2010: Shri C.J.K. Rao, coun e! forihe petitioner. Heard. Submission of iearne counsei for the petitioner is that the order dated 29.4.2016 pas ed in Writ Appea! No.340/2909 with fegard to the Apprentice quarety applies in the case of the petitioner and the petitioneri aiso emitted to the same benefit. In View of the ab e submissions made, it wouid he appropriate to direct the petitioner to approach respondent authorities ciaiming such pa ty. Accordingiy, this petiton is finaiiyitdisposed of with itberty to the petitioner to approach r epondent No. 2. in ease representation is fiied by the petitioner, res ondent No. 2 shalt decide the same in accordance with law. it is made oiear that t is Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and t e authority concerns wouid decide the petitioner’s case after do verification of the facts strictiy in r accordance with iaw. Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge l \ \a c.» ”Mew t v Warm—ww = V ‘i