IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN : PRESENT : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE: P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No. 4592 of 2010 Between: 1. Smt. Ramisetti Alivelu Mangathayaru, W/o. Jagan Mohan Rao 2. Ramisetti Jagan Mohan Rao, S/o. Venkata Narasayya 3. Rangisetti Babu Rao, S/o. Sreeramulu. Petitioners/A1 to A3 AND State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. Respondent Petition under Section 438 of CR.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the memo of grounds filed in Crl.P., the High Court may be pleased to grant them anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest by the police in connection with Cr.No.177/2009 of Jaggaiahpeta Police Station, on such terms and conditions. The Petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K. Sarva Bhouma Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor for Respondent, the Court made the following ORDER: “The complaint of the de facto complainant is that accused No.1, petitioner No.1 herein, has sold her property, for which a partition suit was pending, suppressing the fact of pendency of the said suit. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that there was no suppression and the de facto complainant was informed about pendency of the suit. It is accepted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in the sale deed in favour of the de facto complainant, there is no reference to the pending partition suit. Hence, the contention of the de facto complainant that she was not informed about the pending partition suit has to be accepted. In the circumstances, in case the petitioners repay the amount of the de facto complainant i.e. a sum of Rs.1,46,000/- (Rupees one lakh forty six thousand only) to her, they can be granted anticipatory bail. Post on 14-06-2010, as the learned counsel for the petitioners wants to get instructions with regard to repayment of the amount to the de facto complainant.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2 To 1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at Jaggaiahpet, Krishna District. 2. The S.H.O., Jaggaiahpeta Police Station, Krishna District. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyd(OUT) 4. One CC to Sri K. Sarvabhouma Rao, Advocate (OPUC) 5. One spare copy. KK HIGH COURT PSRJ DT. 9-6-2010 NOTE: POST ON 14-06-2010 ORDER CRL.P.NO.4592 OF 2010 DIRECTION Drafted by: KK Drafted on: 10-6-2010 HIGH COURT PSRJ DT. 9-6-2010 NOTE: POST ON 14-06-2010 ORDER CRL.P.NO.4592 OF 2010 DIRECTION