\.L Z<F-/-sr?/7- m THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATT^ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONsNo. ^^^3 /2006 PETITIONER ^ .- SMT. MUKTA CHANDRAKAR, WIFE OF SHRI KISHAN LAL CHANDRAKAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, ASSISTANT, TEACHER, GOVT. PRIMARY SCHOOL, TUMGAON R/o. VERDHMAN NAGAR, y^^--' TUMGAON ROAD, MAHASAMUND ..-<\ ...•'° ^^ ./^-?w ^y '^'" (C.G.) ,:1) STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARMENT OF SCHOOL ^f\^/ /^y. ^^ /^•"••« EDUCATION, DKS BHAWAN, RAIPUR (C.G.S) DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, MAHASAMUND (C.G.) BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, MAHASAMUND, MAHASAMUND (C.G.) DISTRICT WRIT PETJION UNDEiR AETICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITOTON OF HTOIA XI-HC-7S. sn^rw R-)i+ (iwsns^Tgnra 3^ "i)l<(ld<<, aifl+1'16, Rdlti^ ^-^.^f.s'../tr.l!1 HIHMt Sh+1«*»• 3Ti^?ri4acb (qgrigg^Er) ^ 200 ?%TaRBl?(T3n^I 30.8.2006 Mrs. HamidQ Siddique, co^nsel for the petitioner. Mr. Scrtish Supta, &eput^| ^rafFPft^ ITPRTt'ff fetA <JSlTZTC ^sri^irsTT^r 6ovt. Advocote for the State/respondents, on A advance copy. Hecfd. The case of the petitiorjer is 'thatAe is wor-king os Assjstant Teacher and as per the Instrucfion d<rt)ed 24-12-98 issued by the State of M.P., the Assistant Teachers who hwe |>assed B.T.I., B.Ed. and M.Ed. examination on their own expenses after 22-1^-64 are entitled fm* two advance increments. TTia petitioner possed the B.Ed exc»ninotionon her own cost in the yeor 1996 and copy of the mark Aeet to •that effect is Annexure P-2, but 1+ie petitioner has not been given the benefitj whereas, simifwly situated persons have been grwted two advcnce increments under •l+ie orders of the Tribunal wid this Court. Having heard leffl-ned codpse\ for the part-ies, having regwd to the facts and circumstonces of the case, ^ithout expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the petitioner is allow^d to make a detailed representation olong with a copy of this petition and |jts annexures raising all her yievonces to respondent No.2 wfthin a perio^ of 15 days from today ancf in tum, respondent No.2 is directed to examine t(ie case of the petitioner in the light of the werments made by the pefitioner in this writ petition and jn the representation alaa. If resp^nderrt- No.2 reoches to the conclusion thnt similQrty situoted persons hdfie been 9ruited henefit of two advonce incr'ements and the petitioner's increments on the basis of 6ove case is afso covered for grant of two advance ^nment's order, then respondent No.2 shall P.T.O. XI-HC-78 T5? •<ll<<|if^, •Eii-dl+i'TC, RKtltiy '^ *TTffCfT aitlTcfr Wi; 200 3TI^?T4ach (^qIgsi^iEr) sn^sTwfiaw cIWSn^Tsbliiti ?RTTWHf^cT3nc!?r —'2--' ^rafgrit-r idiirfr ff fWI'riSiTZTC ^sri^q'sn^r thle order on the pfipresentation of the date of its receipt, in accor-da^ce With the directions aforestiid, Parties are entitled for cerf Somo petitioner within a period of 3 months from with law. aid, the petition stands disposed of. tified copy of this order. y v<"^ P.T.O.