IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 8668 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 12th May, 2010. Tarsem Singh and others Petitioners through Mr. R.K.Arora, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] Notice of motion. Mr.K.S.Sidhu, learned DAG, Punjab, accepts notice. Keeping in view the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to ask the respondents to file counter-affidavit. The petitioners seek a Mandamus to direct the respondents to count the service rendered by them in the privately managed Government Aided Schools towards the 'qualifying service' for pensionary benefits. Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the matter herein is squarely covered in favour of the petitioners by a decision of this Court in CWP No. 14238 of 1991 [Sukhdev Singh & Ors. V State of Punjab & Ors. decided on March 10, 2010. Consequently, this writ petition is allowed in the same terms. Dasti. May 12, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE