HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA CRL.P.No.4289 of 2007 ORDER: Petitioner seeks quashing of the order passed in Crl.R.P.No.11 of 2007 dated 30.03.2007 on the file of the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mirayalaguda, confirming the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.2240 of 2006 in M.C.No.13 of 2006 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mirayalaguda. This petition was listed for the first time before this Court on 26.07.2007. Thereafter, this matter did not see the light of the day and for the first time this matter is listed before me today. Hence, it is clear that the petitioner has not evinced any interest in the matter. There is no order of interim stay or whatsoever in the case. Respondents 1 and 2 herein, being the parents of the petitioner herein, filed the aforesaid Crl.M.P.No.2240 of 2006 seeking interim maintenance from the petitioner herein. The trial Court, after an analysis of the entire evidence available on record, awarded monthly maintenance of Rs.750/- each to respondents 1 and 2 herein from the date of filing of the said petition. Questioning the said order, the petitioner herein preferred Crl.R.P.No.11 of 2007 and the learned V Additional Sessions Judge, Miryalaguda, after re-assessing the entire evidence, dismissed the said revision. Aggrieved by the same, the present criminal petition is filed by the petitioner. The trial Court as well as the revisional Court have discussed the entire evidence available on record and gave a concurrent finding that the respondents 1 and 2 are entitled to maintenance, which factual aspect cannot be gone into by this Court invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. I find no merit in this petition. The Criminal Petition is accordingly dismissed. _______________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J) 2O.04.2010 Gsn.