IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 11TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 20TH BHADRA 1929 RP.No. 845 of 2007() -------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN CRP.753/2007 Dated 14/08/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/DECREE HOLDER ----------------------------------------------------------- K.ALIKUNJU, S/O KUNHI KOCHU HAJI, AGED 61 YEARS, KORANIYIL HOUSE, THAIKKATTUKARA, ALUVA TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN SRI.GEORGE MATHEW RESPONDENTS: PETITIONERS/JUDGMENT DEBTORS ----------------------------------------- 1. PATHUMMA, W/O VEERANKUTTY, PATTARAYIL VEEDU, PURAYAR DESOM, ALUVA P.O. 2. BASHEER, S/O VEERANKUTTY, PATTARAYIL VEEDU, PARAYAR DESOM, ALUVA P.O. 3. ABDUL SALAM, S/O VEERANKUTTY, PATTARAYIL VEEDU, PURAYAR DESOM, ALUVA P.O. 4. SULEKHA, D/O VEERANKUTTY, PATTARAYIL VEEDU, PURAYAR DESOM, ALUVA P.O. 5. NABIYA, D/O VEERANKUTTY, PATTARAYIL VEEDU, PURAYAR DESOM, ALUVA P.O. 6. RAMLA D/O VEERANKUTTY, PATTARAYIL VEEDU, PURAYAR DESOM, ALUVA P.O. BY ADV. SRI.S.SHYAM THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N.Krishnan, J. ======================== R.P.No.845 of 2007 in C.R.P.No.753 of 2007 ======================== Dated this the 11th day of September, 2007. ORDER This is an application to review the order passed by me on 14th August, 2007. I had considered the entire matter in detail and I have arrived at a decision. There is nothing inaccurate on the face of the record or anything which the review petitioner was not in a position to bring to my notice in spite of due diligence at that point of time. I had already entered a finding and given my views on the points raised and such views cannot be changed in a petition for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure. So, the Review Petition is dismissed. M.N.Krishnan, Judge. ess 12/9