1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Second Appeal No. 1234 of 2004 (Tarabai Vasant Chaudhari V. Bhausaheb Narhari Choudhari & ors) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. R.R.Karpe, Advocate for the appellant Mr. R.F. Totala, Advocate for respondents No. 1A to 1G Per Court : 1. Heard. 2. This Second Appeal is filed against the finding recorded by the first appeal Court that the appellant / plaintiff could not prove her possession over the suit land on the date of filing of the suit. On this very issue, the learned Judge of the trial Court took a different view and held that the appellant / plaintiff had proved that they were in possession of the suit land. However, the learned Judge of the first appeal Court reversed that finding recording cogent reasons. 3. Having gone through the Judgments of both the Courts below, I found, the view taken by the first appeal Court to be correct one. Besides, since it is a 2 matter of appreciation of evidence, there is hardly any scope for interference at this stage. There arises no substantial question of Law in this appeal. Appeal stands dismissed. 4. In view of dismissal of second appeal, Civil Application No. 9355 of 2004 stands disposed of. 28th June, 10 ( A.V.NIRGUDE,J. ) srm/