<^ CL^^o 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (S) N0._$^^-\_/2009 PETITIONERS ^ t 1. Dr. Smt. Shobha Bist, W/o Shri B.S.Bist, Aged about 56 years, R/o Padmawati Apartment, 1st Floor, Flat No.l-D, Beside S.B.I. Collectorate Branch, Nehru Chowk, Distt. Bilaspur-(C.G.) ?^\A.\^ /2- Geeta singh, D/o Shri Ram Vishal Singh, ^ (^y^ t^ \^ Aged about 50 years, R/o Geetanjali -^> ^ rr ^:^''..^ ^ RESPONDENTS Nagar, Karbala Road, Bilaspur-(C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Commissioner, Directorate of Higher Education, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226jDFLTHE^CQNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER .^^ -HC—78 W^l ^FT ^FIW ^^T ^H^TsR^H^R' .^•- ^ 'ysEf <<n'4t<?i^, ^tftwT^', fsr^TRT^ \^'^ L^) ^>^U __ NINdllR^I^ ""' "^ ' T^ ^ ^TT^T 'tT^P (^f^^f) ^^T^R'^rf^cl ^^ SB ; HON'BLB SHRI JUSTICB PRITINKBR DIWAKER 04.Q9.2QQ9 Shri Sunil Otwani , couns Ms. SumtaJa.in, P.L. for t At the outset, counsel for|the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to file repre^ however submits that directioi concerned for deciding the expeditiously. Counsel for the State ha^ any such representation and authority concemed in accordar4 Accordingly, the petition liberty as aforesaid. In th^ representation by the petitioneij the date of receipt of copy of | ^entation before respondent No.l. He. representation of the petitioner ^{M{<ri^ll ^WT^f ^f fe^ Zf^RC5R ^^tRR3^T bi for the petitioner. hie Sfcate. h may be issued to the authority representation of the petitioner no objection if the petitioner makes |the saiTie is being decided by the 'e with law. lis dismissed as withdrawn with the eventuality of filing any such within a period of one month from 'this order, it is expected from the respondent No. 1 that the sarfie would be decided expeditiously^ preferably within a period of fouf months from the date of its receipt. It is made clear that this Court has not commented on the merits of the case and the authcjrities concemed are free to decide the trictly in accordance with law. Sd/- pritinkerDiwaker Judge ^t