FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 148 OF 2009 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Heard Shri Pahune Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Jadhav, learned A.G.P. for respondents. This contempt petition was filed alleging breach of the order dated 11.9.2008, passed by this Court in writ petition No. 5425 of2008. By order dated 11.9.2008, in writ petition No. 5425 of 2008, this Court remanded the matter to the S.L.A.O. Jaikwadi Project No.1 to work out rental compensation alongwith interest thereof and on such being determined and after hearing acquiring body, make payment thereof within four months thereafter. The grievance of the petitioner is that the dictions given in paragraphs No.3 of the order dated 11.9.2008, was not complied with and therefore, the respondents are guilty of committing of Contempt of Court’s order. On behalf of the respondents Shri. Balnath Pundlik Morwal, presently working as S.L.A.O. Jaikwadi Project No.1, Aurangabad made an affidavit dated 24.7.2009. Alongwith the affidavit a communication dated 11.12.2009 addressed by Executive Engineer to petitioner No.1 herein is enclosed. By that letter, the petitioner No.1 is called upon to collect the cheque subject to identification. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am satisfied that there is compliance of the order dated 11.9.2008, passed in writ petition No. 5425 of 2008. Though there was delay in complying with the order, in my opinion, this is not a fit case for taking action under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. In the result, notice is discharged. Contempt petition stands disposed of. (R.G. KETKAR, J.) Date:15.12.2009. rlj/