IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27679 of 2009 1. MEENA DEVI 2. Dinesh Mukhia Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 10.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. In the case, there is demand and killing but according to the learned counsel that is not made against this petitioners, who happens to be the mother and brother of the deceased husband. After fulfilling all the demands again husband went to sasural demanded Rs. 10,000/- and after sometime disclosed that his wife was no more. In the inquest though some sign is shown on neck but in postmortem, there is no injuries found on the person of the deceased. So, fixing liability upon petitioners their prayer for anticipatory bail cannot be refused. Death was informed to the informant but that also by the husband only. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 25 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhubani subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)