1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application No.267 of 2010 [Mohd. Anis Mohd. Yunis Vs. State of Mah.] With Criminal Application No.271 of 2010 [Abdul Abrar Abdul Gaffar Vs. State of Mah.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Criminal Application No. 267 of 2010 : Mr.P.B. Patil, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Doifode, APP for respondent. ----- Criminal Application No. 271 of 2010 : Mr.P.B. Patil, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Doifode, APP for respondent. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 18th March, 2010. 1. These are two applications for regular bail. 2. The applicants are being tried for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 376 of Indian Penal Code. 3. Heard. 4. Medical evidence, i.e., Post-mortem 2 Report supports the case of rape on the victim before death. 5. In so far as involvement of accused is concerned, there is evidence of 'last seen.' 6. Worthiness of this evidence is being disputed on the ground of delay in recording statement of witness as to “last seen”, which is about a day's time. 7. At this stage, prima facie, there is strong evidence against the accused persons supporting the prosecution story of involvement of the accused. 8. In view of this, the applicants do not have a case for grant of bail. 9. Applications are, therefore, rejected. Judge |Hedau|