1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 147 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 313 OF 2005 [A.P.M.C. Kille Dharur, Tq. Dharur,Vs. State of Mah.& others] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri.R.S.Shinde,Advocate for Appellant. Shri.P.D.Suryawanshi,Advocate h/f Shri.D.N.Suryawanshi,Advocate for Respondent No.6. .... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND K.K. TATED, JJ. DATE : 6th SEPTEMBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Appellant-petitioner challenges the order, dated 24th January, 2007, passed by the learned Single Judge (CORAM: R.M.SAVANT, J.) in the Writ Petition No. 313 of 2005. 2 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders 3. Mr. Shinde, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the matter is required to be remanded back for determination of assets and liabilities of the two bifurcated Agricultural Produce Market Committees. 4. This issue has been considered by two Authorities and the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge passed a reasoned order. We do not find any infirmity or perversity in the order passed by the learned Single Judge. 5. One Agricultural Produce Market Committee is bifurcated into two Market Committees, in the year 1998. After 12 years, we do not find it necessary to reconsider the issue in respect of assets and liabilities. There is no merit in the present Letter Patent 3 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s Orders Appeal, the same is dismissed accordingly. Sd/- Sd/- [K.K. TATED, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.] MTK