IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN TUESDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2009 / 20TH SRAVANA 1931 Bail Appl..No. 4051 of 2009() -------------------------------------- CRIME NO.732/2008 OF NEDUMANGAD POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED: -------------------------------------- RENJITH, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O. BABU, EDAPPARAMELL VEEDU, THOZHUVANCODU, KANJIRAMPARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.K.SATHEESH KUMAR RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT: -------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. SRI. TEKCHAND, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.T. SANKARAN, J. --------------------------- B.A. No.4051 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 11th day of August, 2009 O R D E R This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the 7th accused in Crime No.732/2008 of Nedumangad Police Station. 2. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 447 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. I have gone through the Case Diary. The wound certificate discloses that the defacto complainant has sustained several incised wounds. In the F.I. Statement, it is stated that sword and choppers were used as weapons of offence. Several persons armed with deadly weapons have attacked the defacto complainant, according to the prosecution. 4. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of injuries sustained by the defacto complainant, I do not think that the petitioner is entitled to B.A. No.4051/2009 Page numbers the discretionary relief under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Bail Application is accordingly, dismissed. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE scm