IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5418 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- HELODAR DUDH UTPADAK SAHKARI MANDALI LIMITED Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. Special Civil Application No. 5418 of 2000 MR HARIN P RAVAL for Petitioner No. 1 MR L B DABHI AGP for Respondent No. 1 .......... for Respondent No. 2-7 MR IM PANDYA for Respondent No. 8 MR MINESH V PATEL for Respondent No. 8 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI Date of decision: 17/12/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. The petitioner has preferred this petition in order to quash and set aside the order dated 5th June, 2000 passed by respondent no.2 herein, at Annexure-H to the petition. 2. While issuing Notice on 12/06/2000, this Court had stayed the operation, implementation and execution of the impugned order dated 5th June, 2000, at Annexure-H to the petition. The said stay order has continued till today. 3. In above view of the matter, it would be appropriate if the stay granted by this Court by order 12/06/2000 and which has continued till today, is continued till the Appeal pending before the Tribunal is heard and disposed of. Hence, the ad-interim relief granted by this Court will continue, till the Appeal pending before the Tribunal is heard and disposed of. 4. With the above directions, the petition is disposed of. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent with no order as to costs. (K. S. Jhaveri, J.) pravin/