IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31947 of 2011 Ravindra Sharma Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 15.10.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 41 and 42 of the Forest Act. The forest officer intercepted a truck with wood lodgs. The driver and cleaner of the truck disclosed the name of petitioner that he had prepared forged permit and on the basis of which the wood logs were taken from the forest officer. It appears that the license is in the name of one Vijay Sharma and the petitioner is the labour of Vijay Sharma. It appears from the prosecution report that the alleged forged permit was in the name of M/S. Sharma Saw Mill, Aurangabad whose proprietor was Vijay Sharma. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on 2 bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Forest Act Case No. 01 of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Aurangabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)