IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2010 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 28253 of 2009(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- RAPPAI.A.O., S/O. OUSEPH (PROPRIETOR, PREMIER BUILDING MATERIALS) KOTTOOR VEEDU, CHITTODY.P.O., VANDAZHY, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.M.C.JOHN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,DIST. OFFICE, PALAKKAD, REP. BY ENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, NEAR DIST. PANACHAYAT OFF ICE PALAKKAD-678001. 2. THE VANDAZHY GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY SECRETARY, VANDAZHY PALAKKAD. 3. P.J.MATHEW, S/O. P.A. JOHN, PATHIYAN HOUSE, CHITTODY.P.O., VANDAZHY, PALAKKAD. ADV. SRI.P.R.VENKETESH FOR R3 SHRI M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS, SC, FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/12/2010 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.28253/2009-B ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner approached this Court by filing this writ petition seeking to quash Ext.P5 proceedings of the Senior Environmental Engineer. 2. He is running a R.C.C Bricks and Blocks Unit. It appears that there was a complaint, raised by the third respondent, that the location is very near to his residential house. Ultimately, the petitioner was directed to shift the same beyond 10 meters from the nearest residence. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the third respondent also. This Court had passed an interim order dated 08/10/2009 as follows:- “The second respondent shall not give effect to the direction of the first respondent to cancel the licence issued to the petitioner for a period of four weeks. This is to enable the petitioner to appear before W.P.(C). No.28253/2009 -:2:- the first respondent and do the needful to cure the deficiencies as shown in Ext.P5. The petitioner's request for some time for shifting the unit will also be considered by the first respondent.” The said interim order was extended from time to time. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has already shifted the machinery unit, and therefore, there is no complaint whatsoever now and, the learned counsel for the third respondent also submitted that the petitioner has already complied with the directions. Recording the same, the writ petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE