THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.3745 of 2009 ORDER: The respondent filed O.S.No.853 of 2007 in the Court of IX Additional Senior Civil Judge (Fast Track Court), City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against the petitioner, for eviction from the schedule premises. After the pleadings were complete, the respondent filed I.A.No.562 of 2008, under Order VII Rule 14 C.P.C., with a prayer to receive certain documents. The trial Court allowed the I.A., through its order, dated 09.06.2009. The same is challenged in this C.R.P. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. The only ground urged by the petitioner is that, the documents, which are filed through I.A., were not mentioned in the plaint, or the rejoinder. Even if that is true, the right of a party to a suit, to file the documents, cannot be denied, just like that. Much would depend upon the facts and circumstances of the case. The trial Court made an observation to the effect that the list comprises of public documents and the correspondence that ensued between the parties. The object underlying the provision is that the other party shall not be taken by surprise. The trial of the suit is yet to commence. No prejudice can be said to have been suffered by the petitioner, on account of receipt of documents. The relevance or proof thereof can certainly be adjudicated at the relevant stage of the suit. The C.R.P. is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dated:18.09.2009. GJ