IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.5324-M of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision:25.4.2011 Vijay Kohli and others .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sidharth Sarup, D.A.G. Haryana. Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, Advocate for the complainant. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.22 dated 13.1.2011 registered under Sections 420/467/468/471 IPC at Police Station Thanesar City, District Kurukshetra. In the connected petition i.e. Crl. M. No.4635-M of 2011 filed for quashing of FIR in question, the State has filed the reply submitting therein that the cancellation report has been prepared and the petitioner is not required in the present case. Accordingly, the present petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. 25.4.2011 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE