•'^c. ..: -GV W THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fCG) WRIT PETITION fS) N077<::?s-^_1--_/2006 WRIT_PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFJNDIA, PETITIONER ^.. 'Smt. Kamla Rani Sinha (B.Ed.), widow &'- ^...•••^.^ofLate Rajkishore Prasad Chakhiyar,^';'C'A)^ '•«i/^ ..-•"' Upper Division Teacher, Govemment i^- \,?-y^?; .."' Upper Division Teacher, Govemment ^•VJ^^V'""" Middle School (Head Master) - )"~ Dangargaon, Vikas Khand Kansabel, iS*"" . •i ^ ^^f~...^ RESPONDENTS ..,^-^€i ^I^ l^ 'V ^! G. Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State ofChhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) c^\'"' 2. The Assistant Commissioner, Distt. Jashpur (CG) 3. The Block Education officer, Kansabel, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) ^ XI-HC-78 <-n*(^rTsh*iich 3^ •<11<IIW<<, ®Tfl'M'l(o,Rldltiy . u>.p. C^) CJis.. ~7^S-7/06, ^ 200 311^1 i<siqi (l?t^'s"<,'SI') sTi^r^iTf?^) aaiTSTT^TgitTW &ibhosh .^r -Y ?HITW(rf?(T3TI^T 09^1.2007 Mr. A.N. Bhakta, coimsel for| Smt. Ar(ju Ahiya, Oepirty State/reqwndents. With the consent of tearAed parties, the Nrrit petition is heard Common order dictoted in in open Court, passed sepanrtely. A copy of this order be connected wrrit petH'tons. Writ '*w]n<!\-f ^i^ciTfftec3'<Ri'wii ^srf^iTsn^T the petith>ner(s). Sovermnent Advocote for •the counsel vyfumwg for Ihe inally and disposed of. Wt Petition (S) hto. 7484/2006 ploced on the recordi of •the Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge P.T.O. V? ^"^1 HKH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'M^ MR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PETTTEON tS.) N0.7484 OF 2006 Petitioner : Jagcrtpal Ram versus ftespondents ; Stnte of Chhatt-isgarh ond arwther Petitioner WRTT PETTTION tS.t N0.7486 OF 2006 : fianesh Ram Pradhan verais Iteswncksnts Storte ef ChhorttiS9arh ond another 4nd WRTT PFm-ION tS.) N0.7487 OF 2006 Petitioner : Smt. Kamla Rani Sinha versus Respondents ; Stnte of Chhatt-i^arh and others Present : Mr. A.N. Bhakta, counsel for the petitioner(s). Smt. Anju Ahuja, Oepirty fiovemment Advocate for •fhe State/respondents. OR DER (fasaed on this 9th doy of Jonuary, 2007) Leamed counsel oppearing for the petitfoners as well as for the State/respondents jointfy submit that -the focts ond questton of lcn» invotved in the present writ petition are squarely covered by -the decision of -this Court in the cose of Yeslweari- Kumar Wuvwdwaj vs. Munle^ial Capwwtion, Owy emd eawrtM^. r /.' 2. For the trforementwned reasons, the writ petitions are disposed of m terms of the decision of this Court in •the matt-er of )teANBff/' Kumar KiaradwaJ (Supra), subject to verifioation of -the fact ns to whether the petitioners have ocquired B.Ed./B.TJ. Cerl-ificoftes at their own expenses as per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether they have been paid two advance mcrements or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of •this order be placed on •the record of the connected writ petitions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Subhash 1 2006CII)MPJR-C696