IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN CONTEMPT CASE No.1410 of 2010 Between: Vijaya Milk Producers Mutually Aided Co-operative Society Ltd., Raheemkhanpet village, Ellanthankunta Mandal, Karimnagar District, reptd., by its President Sri Yenugunla Lingaiah. … Petitioner And Sri D.R.Garg, The Commissioner/Registrar Mutually Aided Co-op Societies (RCS), Gruhakalpa, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri N.Rajeshwar Rao Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Co-operation for R.1 & R.2. This Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed alleging willful disobedience of order dated 6-9-2010 in Writ Petition No.22193 of 2010. Having regard to the events that have transpired subsequent to the filing of the Contempt Case, it is not necessary to refer to the background in which the Contempt Case is filed. It will suffice to note that contrary to the interim order granted by this Court, elections to the Managing Committee of the Vijaya Milk Producers Mutually Aided Co-operative Society (for short “the Society”) were conducted on 30-9-2010. Alleging that the said election is in blatant violation of order dated 6-9-2010 of this Court, the Contempt Case is filed. Today respondent No.2 is personally present in the Court. Respondent No.1 has filed a counter-affidavit and also enclosed proceedings in Rc.No.3023/2010-E, dated 7-12-2010, wherein it is, inter alia, stated that as the conduct of elections by respondent No.2 on 30-9- 2010 is contrary to the order of this Court, the Managing Committee of the Society, elected on 30-9-2010, is dissolved with immediate effect and the elections are annulled. Respondent No.2 will convene General Body Meeting of the Society on 14-12-2010 for constituting the Adhoc Board for conducting elections only for the two vacant posts of Directors, scheduled to be held on 22-12-2010, in accordance with interim order dated 6-9-2010. Though the acts of respondent No.2, referred to above, were contrary to the order passed by this Court, having realized the same, he has taken corrective steps to reverse all those acts. By these actions, respondent No.2 has purged the contempt. Therefore, the Contempt Case is closed. __________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Dt.10-12-2010 MNR