IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-6812 of 2008. Date of decision:- 19.5.2008. Karnail Singh ...Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. S.S.Dinarpur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Navneet Singh, AAG Haryana. RAJESH BINDAL J. The petitioner in the present case has been summoned by the court below on the application filed by the prosecution under Section 319 Cr.P.C. The FIR in question was registered on 27.5.2005 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 302 IPC. After trial seven accused were convicted by the court on January 23, 2008 and the petitioner was summoned on May 23, 2007, meaning thereby there was sufficient material on record to summon the petitioner. He is in custody for the last ten months only. The factum that the other seven accused in the same FIR had been convicted, after the petitioner had been summoned to face trial under Section 319 Cr.P.C. has not been mentioned in the petition. However, as the offence committed by the petitioner is grievous in nature, I do not think it to be a fit case for grant of bail. The petition is dismissed. May 19, 2008. (RAJESH BINDAL) asija JUDGE