- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.492 OF 2006 Mukund Iron & Staff Assn. Co.Op. Housing Socy.Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.S.M.Oka Advocate for Petitioner Mrs.Pathan for B.M.C. Mrs.U.V.Kejariwal A.P.P. for State ... CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : MARCH 13, 2006 DATE : MARCH 13, 2006 DATE : MARCH 13, 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioner, learned advocate for B.M.C. who was made respondent as per our order and learned A.P.P. for State. 2. The petitioner has sought permission from the Corporation for construction of compound wall as per Exhibits-A & B at page nos.15 and 16 of this petition. Advocate for the B.M.C. states that - 2 - they have no objection if the construction is completed and petitioner complies with the requirements of the permission. The advocate for the petitioner states that they will abide by the terms and conditions laid down in the permission letters annexed at page nos.15 and 16 to this petition. Petition is filed for police protection for five days during which period, they propose to carry out construction and repairs to the compound wall. Therefore, Navghar Police Station, Mulund, Mumbai to provide all necessary police protection to the petitioner at the costs of petitioner during the period of carrying out repairing to the compound wall for a period of five days as per the programme given by the petitioner to the said Police Station. 3. Petition is disposed of. [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]