IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 1788 of 2011 Date of Decision: 31.01.2011 Amardeep Singh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present : Mr. R.K.Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** RANJAN GOGOI, A.C.J.(Oral) Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and upon due consideration of the facts stated in the writ petition, we are of the view that instead of entertaining this petition as a PIL at this stage, it would be more appropriate to require the Deputy Commissioner, Patiala and Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Patiala, to dispose of the petitioner(s) representations dated 10.10.2010 and 27.01.2011 (Annexures P-2 & P-3) respectively. The same will be done by means of a reasoned order within six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In the event the petitioners continue feel aggrieved by such order as may be passed it will be open for them to approach this Court once again at that stage. Writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. (RANJAN GOGOI) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH) 31.01.2011 JUDGE 'ravinder'