IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1837 of 2009 VISHNU KANT KISKU son of Sri Narayan Kisku resident of vill.- Kakari Tari, P.S. & Distt.-Bnaka at present house of late Mangal Gope, Chakbinda, Road no.10, Alkapurinear Panch Mandir, P.S.- Gardanibagh, Distt.-Patna-----------------------------------Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Bela Soren, daughter of Prabhunath Soren resident of Kaliganj Police Station- Manjhar, District-Katihar.--------------------------------------------Opp. Parties. -------------- 3. 8.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. There is no merit in the revision itself. Opposite party no.2, according to the petitioner, is the second wife and not entitled for maintenance under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure may raise the point before the Family Court, Katihar, who will decide the same. Thus, I find this revision petition is not maintainable. So, no question arises about condoning the delay in filing the revision petition. The limitation petition is accordingly dismissed. Petitioner is advised to appear in the Family Court and raise this point before it including other points. The revision petition is thus disposed of. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J. )