IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 18457 of 2007 Date of Decision: 22.1.2009. Swaranjit Kaur ---Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others ---Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI. Present:- Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Charu Tuli, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab. Mr. N.K. Sharma, Advocate for respondents no.2 and 3. Mr. R.P. Singh, Advocate for respondent no.4. *** PERMOD KOHLI.J (ORAL) Petitioner is aggrieved of the order dated 30.10.2007 (Annexure P-8) and the order dated 1.11.2007 (Annexure P-9) whereby petitioner's appointment was set aside. The petitioner was appointed vide order dated 5.9.2007 and the appointment was upto 28.2.2008. It has been pointed out by learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4 that the fresh advertisement is likely to be issued. He has also referred to Annexure P-8, whereby the vacancy in question was ordered to be filled up after proper advertisement. In view of Annexure P-8 and the submission by learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4 that the fresh advertisement is likely to be issued, this petition is rendered infructuous. However, it is directed that respondents will not fill up any post of Aanganwari worker without proper advertisement and the petitioner is at liberty to apply subject to her eligibility. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 22.1.2009 lucky