IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.1893 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.02.2011 Sanjay Grewal and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - None for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sunil Saharan, Advocate, for respondent No.2. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) It is reported that in compliance of order dated 27.7.2009 petitioners had appeared before the learned trial Court and had been enlarged on bail by the learned trial Court. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, on the instructions of Investigating Officer, who is present in Court in person, has stated that now petitioners are facing trial and trial is likely to be concluded in the near future. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, I do not want to interfere with the impugned order, however, order dated 27.7.2009 is made absolute. Petition, thus, stands disposed of accordingly. (Alok Singh) Judge February 23, 2011 R.S.