WP(C) 5780/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE BD AGARWAL Heard Mr. C Baishya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. S Saikia, learne d Standing Counsel for the PWD. The petitioner’s limited prayer is that he has executed various works successfu lly under PWD Department during the year 2006-07. It is also the case of the pet itioner that despite making some payment, the department has not paid the remain ing amount of Rs. 1,60, 160/-( Rupees One Lakh sixty thousand and one hundred an d sixty) Accordingly, the respondents are directed to make an enquiry about the outstandi ng dues of the writ petition. The enquiry shall be made at the level of Chief En gineer. If there is any such outstanding amount, the name of the petitioner shal l be listed in the chronological list and the payment shall be made as per the guidelines in the case of Tamsher Ali-Vs- The State of Assam reported in 2008(4 ) GLT 1. It may be mentioned here that in the earlier writ petition No. 2751 of 2010, the petitioner had claimed outstanding amount of Rs.1,04,811/-( Rupees one lakh fou r thousand eight hundred eleven) and now the petitioner is claiming Rs. 1, 60, 160/-. This aspect may also be taken into consideration. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition stands disposed of.