// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1555/2008 Smt. Sushila Devi W/o Shri Shanti Lal Jain and Others Versus Shri Manoj Kumar Jain (Barjatya) S/o late Shri Ladu Lal Ji and Another Date of Order ::: 23.07.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Peush Nag, Counsel for petitioners #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. This writ petition, on behalf of the defendants, is directed against the impugned order dated 11th January, 2008 passed by the trial court allowing the application filed by the plaintiff under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment in the plaint. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and also examined the reasons assigned by the trial court for allowing the application. The trial court has observed that from the amendment sought in the plaint the nature of the suit is not going to be changed rather // 2 // it relates to the property, in dispute, itself. The trial court was of the view that if the amendment is necessary for effective adjudication of the case then it can be allowed at the costs. The order passed by the trial court appears to be perfectly justified and the same does not call for any interference by this Court. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//