IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. COPC(T) No.: 383 of 2008. Decided on: 28.10.2010. __________________________________________________________ Sunil Kumar and others. … Petitioners. Versus Vakil Singh Atwal. …Respondent/Contemnor. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners : None. For the Respondent/ Contemnor : None. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Since the main petition i.e. CWP(T) No.16016 of 2008 (O.A. No.3061 of 2007) has already been decided by this Court on 14th December, 2009, the present petition is rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. If the petitioner is still aggrieved by the non- compliance of judgment dated 14.12.2009, rendered in CWP(T) No.16016 of 2008 (O.A. No.3061 of 2007), he can approach the appropriate Forum in accordance with law. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. October 28, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?