Crl.Misc No M-2984 of 2010 Kuldeep Singh vs. State of Haryana. PRESENT: Mr.Sandeep Panwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Mor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. *** Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the directions issued by this Court on 2.2.2010, the petitioner has joined the investigation and weapon of offence has also been recovered and he is no more required for further investigation at this stage. He further submits that Section 326 IPC was added later-on and the injured remained in the hospital only for two days. Mr.Mor, learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Raghbir Singh submits that the injury attributed to the petitioner is grievous in nature and he is not entitled to the concession of anticipatory bail. Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and weapon of offence has also been recovered from the petitioner and the injured was discharged from the hospital only after two days, the interim directions issued by this Court on 2.2.2010 are made absolute. However, the petitioner shall abide by the terms and conditions as envisaged in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition is disposed of accordingly. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) March 31, 2010 JUDGE raghav