1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL REVN. APPLN. NO. 678 OF 2009 Swapnil Uday Shah & Anr. ... Applicants. V/s. Suresh Bhupal Bahirsheth & Ors. ... Respondents. WITH CIVIL REVN. APPLN. NO. 679 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL REVN. APPLN. NO. 680 OF 2009 Pranoti Uday Shah & Anr. ... Applicants. V/s. Sarita Suresh Bahirsheth & Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. S.S. Patwardhan for the Applicants. Mr. Omkar Warange for the Respondents. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. DATED : 18th MARCH 2010. P.C. :- The Revision Application is directed against the order passed by the Trial Court rejecting an application of the Petitioner made under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. It may be that there is some case made out in so far as the Trial Court’s jurisdiction is concerned but finding that the Suit is pending in Trial Court for 17 long years and when it was ripe for recording evidence and hearing that the subject application is made, compels me to set aside the order under 2 challenge but not to the extent prayed by the Petitioner. In other words, the request of the Petitioner to dismiss the Respondent’s Suit cannot be granted at this stage but the Trial Court is directed to frame the issue of its jurisdiction as a issue alongwith other issues and try it in accordance with law. While trying the said issue, the Trial Court should take into consideration all pleas including those raised by the Petitioner before this Court in the Revision Application and decide the said issue uninfluenced by any observations made in the impugned order. 3. The Revision Application is disposed of in these terms. The hearing of the Suit is expedited. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.)