» l PETI‘IIONER " { x l r \ . §§N€SE£ BE§E§§3§ @ \/ (.7 \ i IIN,IHE,,HgN'BLE HIaH counT OF CHHAmseARi—i AT 3ILAsPUR wan- PETn-mN (s) No.6 ?§9?2009 / Rajendm KufnarLAgrawaL aged about 53 ysarf, Son ofl Shri Hanumangfmsad, “Upper DIVISIon Teacher", Govt Middle Schoal Kanakveer‘a, Block — Sarangarh, Tahsié Sarangar'h, istf— Raigarh (C.G.) { 1 The State 0f Chha‘rfisgarh, Through- The ’ Secrefary, ; Departmenf of 5chool' Education, KAan’rralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipfur‘ (6.6.) The Director / Commissioner, Lok ‘ Shikshan Sarichanalaya, Raipur (C5,) ThezbistricfEducafion Officer, Diéfricf - ' Raigarh (C.G.) The Blocki Educafion Officer, Block-g Sarangarh, Sisfricf — Raigarh (C:6.) wia’o i RIT PETITION U/A - 226 OF THE'CONSTITUTION OF INDIA f W VERSUS ‘ W i ‘ RESPONDENTS / 1, /2. /3r /4. ER DIWAKER SB HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITINK HIGH ’coum or CHHANISGARH AT siLAsrtiR 7 l - z _ g V PET‘ITIONER ’_.__——— SPONDENTS State of C.G. 85 Others ’1‘ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2 6 OF t ‘ mmA magi With the consent of th 1s heard fmally , 0f th1s petxtmn the pet1txoner 1S seeking regular pay scale on the post of Ass1stant Teacher petmons have been decxded by thxs Cou 15 a concluded one He has also re WP. Chhattisgarh) 1n Which regular pay scale was granted from the date of 1n1t1a1 appomtment Counsel for the respondents/State submits light of the Judgment of th1s Court the represen be representatxon to th three weeks fr SaIIlE S om the date of recelpt of copy of thls order, hall be dec1ded w1th1n a further pemod of one m W P.§S1 NO. 375912009 ' Rajendra Kumar Agrawal \ versus Shm Roop Naik counsel for the petitioner. Shrl Sumesh Bagaj G A for the State. ORAL ORDER (24.07.2009) e counsel for the paxties, the matter By Way Counsel for the petitioner submlts that number of identical feired to one of the orders 1n (S) No. 813/2007 (Ram Kumar Sahu Vs tation to the authorities concern deCided after scrutinizmg the factu With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. 90 \\ TIE OONSTITUTION OF rt and the issue involved State of that v in the petitioner may make a ed and the same would al and legal pos1tion Thus, it is directecl that if the petitioner makes a the onth from he date of its rece1pt e authorities concerned Within a period of ' Sdl- : Pritink’ev’r 'mwaker ' ‘ Judgt i“