IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 27TH SEPTEMBER 2010 / 5TH ASWINA 1932 WP(C).No. 25796 of 2009(S) -------------------------- ( OA.756/2007 of CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH) .................... PETITIONER: ------------------ 1. THE MANAGER, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA PRESS, KHANNA NAGAR POST, KORATTY. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PRINTING, DIRECTORATE OF PRINTING, B.WING, NIRMAN BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-11. 3. UNION OF INDIA, REP.BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, NIRMAN BHAVAN,NEW DELHI. BY ADV. SRI.TPM.IBRAHIM KHAN, SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL FOR CENTRAL GOVERNMENT. RESPONDENT: --------------------- A.V.PRABHAKARAN, ASSISTANT BINDER (RETIRED), GOVERNMENT OF INDIA PRESS, KORATTY (RESIDING AT ANGAATH HOUSE, KORATTY, KHANNA NAGAR P.O.-680 309. BY ADVS. SRI.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, SC. SRI.S.RAJ MOHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/09/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VK WP(C).No. 25796 of 2009(S) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS. EXT.P1. COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.756 OF 2007 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT/APPLICANT ALONG WITH ITS ANNEXURE BEFORE THE HONOURABLE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM BENCH. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE REPLY STATEMENT FILED BY THE PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS IN ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.756 OF 2004 ALONG WITH ITS ANNEXURE BEFORE THE HONOURABLE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM BENCH. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16.10.2008 OF THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ERNAKULAM BENCH IN ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.756 OF 2007. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBIT: EXT.R1.(a) : COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18.01.2007. P.S. TO JUDGE / TRUE COPY / VK C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) NO:25796 OF 2009 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th September, 2010. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Since the order impugned is issued by the Tribunal following another Division Bench judgment of this Court which is said to be implemented in the case of ten persons, this writ petition is also dismissed following the judgment relied on by the Tribunal in their order. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj 2