1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION O. NO.34/2009 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.19260/2008 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.19258/2008 Subhash Panjabrao Deshmukh ....Versus... Jagdish Krupaldas Manuja ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri P.S. Patil, Adv. for applicant] [Shri A.P. Tathod, Adv. for respondent] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 15.07.2009 Heard. Having heard learned Counsel for applicant and having gone through the contents of the application, I find that good and sufficient grounds exist for condoning the delay. Hence, delay is condoned. Civil Application is allowed in terms of its prayer clause – (i). Civil Application stands disposed of. MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.19260/2008 Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed in terms of its prayer clause – (i). Misc. Civil Application stands disposed of. 2 CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.19259/2008 Heard. Having heard learned Counsel for applicant and having gone through the contents of the application, I find that good and sufficient grounds exist for condoning the delay. Hence, delay is condoned. Civil Application is allowed in terms of its prayer clause – (i). Civil Application stands disposed of. JUDGE ssw