CRM NO. M-1275 OF 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM NO. M-1275 OF 2011 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 05.04.2011 Sanjay ...Petitioner versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. Balraj Gujjar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P. M. Anand, Additional A.G., Haryana. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) Sanjay has applied for grant of regular bail in FIR No.352 dated 26.08.2009 under Sections 363/366/120-B IPC (offence under Section 376 IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Sadar, Bhiwani. The petitioner previously filed two bail petitions which were dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 26.03.2010 passed in CRM No. M-5953 of 2010 and order dated 06.12.2010 passed in CRM No. M-33827 of 2010, respectively. Prosecutrix in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C has not named the petitioner but has stated that she has married with Vikram and out of the said wedlock, one child has born. Later on, she has named Haripal, Ramphal, Sumit and the present petitioner as the persons who committed rape upon her. CRM NO. M-1275 OF 2011 (O&M) -2- Learned State counsel is fair enough to concede that Haripal, Ramphal and Sumit have been allowed the concession of bail by the trial Court. The allegations against the petitioner are also similar. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 27.08.2009. The case is now stated to be fixed for application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. So, without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition for grant of regular bail stands allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of trial Court. APRIL 05, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE