THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5836 of 2010 Dated: 24.12.2010 Between: Jasti Satyanarayana Murthy ..... PETITIONER AND M/s. Rajesh Tyres and another .....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5836 of 2010 ORDER: The revision petitioner, who suffered an ex parte decree in O.S.No.459 of 2004 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kovvur, filed an application under Order 9 Rule 13 of C.P.C. for setting aside the ex parte decree along with I.A.No.339 of 2010 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 1089 days. The said application was dismissed by the Court below by order dated 20.08.2010 holding that the petitioner failed to make out any sufficient cause for condoning the inordinate delay of 1089 days. Aggrieved by the same, the present Revision Petition is filed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the affidavit filed in support of I.A.No.339 of 2010, I do not find any justifiable reason to hold that the Court below had committed any error in dismissing the application. As rightly found by the Court below, except a vague plea that the 1st defendant/revision petitioner came to know about the ex parte decree only after receiving the notice in E.P., there was absolutely no material to substantiate the same. Hence, the interference by this Court is not warranted. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. ___________ Date: 24.12.2010 G. ROHINI, J Ivd