IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Revision No.223 of 2007 (Munna @ Kuldipsingh s/o Krupalsingh Rahal v. The State of Maharashtra and others) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri V.M. Deshpande, Advocate for Applicant. APP for Non-Applicant No.1. Coram : R.C. Chavan, J. Dated : 2nd December, 2008 This revision is directed against the acquittal of the non-applicants by the learned Additional Sessions Judge for offence punishable under Section 307 of the Penal Code. The learned Additional Sessions Judge instead convicted the non- applicants of offence punishable under Section 324 of the Penal Code. The learned counsel for the applicant/original complainant vehemently argued that the learned Additional Sessions Judge should not have acquitted the non-applicants for offence punishable under Section 307 of the Penal Code in face of categorical statement by the Medical Officer PW 9 Dr. Sune that had the surgery not performed, the patient would have died. He pointed out that the internal organs like omentum and mesocolon were injured in the stab injury. The learned APP, however, points out that the State had preferred Criminal Application No.3425 of 2007 seeking leave to file appeal against the very same judgment whereby the learned Judge had acquitted the non-applicants of offence punishable under Section 307 of the Penal Code. A Division Bench of this Court by judgment dated 23-9-2008 refused leave resulting in dismissal of the appeal. In view of this, revision cannot at all be entertained. The revision is dismissed. Judge. Pdl.