1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Writ Petition No.399/2006 Sau. Mangalabai w/o Dipak Pawar .. Petitioner vrs Prabhakar Narayan Pawar and others .. Respondents .......... Mr. Amol Deshpande, Advocate holding for Mr. R.L. Khapre, Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. D.B. Yengal, APP for respondent no.7/State. .......... Coram : K. J. Rohee, J Dated : 6 th September, 2006 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for respondent no.7/State. 2. The complaint, no doubt, shows that in the second marriage between Dipak s/o Narayan Pawar (accused no.1) and Pratibha (accused no. 2), accused nos.3 to 7 took active part and Accused no.8 acted as Priest. However the verification contains only one sentence to the effect that the complainant learnt from Ramesh s/o Udhavrao Randhare that her husband remarried. Thus there was nothing wrong on the part of the learned Magistrate to have issued process only against accused nos.1 and 2. I find no merit in the petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed in limine. JUDGE asg