(D c ^' vo (y IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR(C.G.» WRIT PETITION N0. ^G° /2004 / PETITIONER Manaharan Lal Dewangan, S/o. Shri Bhuwan Lal Dewangan, Aged about 38 years, R/o. Village & P.0, Ganiyari, District Bilaspur (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS \^Vv^ ^^\2 w^' ff*..-' ' 3. 4. State of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Directorate of Higher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Additional Director, Higher Education, Raipur & Bastar Division, Raipur (C.G) Principal, Govt. College, Lalbahadur Nagar, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22'6/22'7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR XSSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITIOW AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WMTS. DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS. tSSSS HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILA8PUR SIngle Bench; Hon'ble Shrl SaUsh K. A^iihotri, J. W. P. No. 2008 OF 2004 Petitioner Manaharan Lal Dewaagan Versus Respondeuts ; State of CUiattisgarh and ofhers Shri Ashish Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Panel lawyer for the State/respondents. ORAL ORDER (26th July, 2006) This petition has been ffled iinpugniag the oider dated 25.9.2000 (Annexure P-7) whereby, fhe services of the petitioner was discoatinued. The petitioner had chatlenged this order in O.A. No. 1113/2000, before the Madhya Pradesh, Adininistrative Tribunal, beach at Raipur. On dissolution of the Madhya Pradesh Adiainistrative Tribuiial, Raipur, the inatter has been transferrcd to this Court. The instaat petition was filed impugniag fhe sanie order which is ah-eady under challenge in O.A. No.ll 13/2000, registered now as W.P.S. No. 3427/2005. Leamed counsel for fhe petitioner on iastruction, subinits fhat the petitioner wants to wifhdraw this petition, in view of the transfer of Original AppUcation before this Court, as this petition seeks for the same reUef, as has been sought for in Original AppUcation, to which learaed counsel appearing for the respoudeats has no objection. r^ . ^' 3. Accordiagly, this petition is dismissed as withdranvn. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge GJ»^'