IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1051 OF 2008 (S/S) Smt. Leela Negi ………………….Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. …………….Respondents. Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 0 24th October, 2008 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. This petition is directed against the transfer order dated 02.10.2008 contained in Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition passed by the respondent no. 3 as well as the impugned transfer order dated 25.7.2008 passed by the respondent no. 3 contained in Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that she has served since 18.11.1977 till 21.1.1986 in Durgam Area, but after construction of Tehri Dam, the same School, where the petitioner has served in the Sugam area and the period served in the Durgam area is not being counted as served in Durgam Area. Further grievance of the petitioner is that she is not being given the benefit of the Transfer Policy. 3. Transfer is an exigency of service and is made annually in public interest, but looking to the grievance of the petitioner, it is provided that the petitioner shall be allowed to continue till the end of the session i.e. 31st March, 2009 and at the time of annual general transfer, the petitioner’s case for transfer shall be reconsidered. 4. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of along with the pending application(s). (P.C. Verma, J.) 24.10.2008 Rathour