IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 155 OF 2003. SUIT NO. 155 OF 2003. SUIT NO. 155 OF 2003. Kamla Chunilal Daxini. ... Plaintiff. V/s. 1. Harisum Construction Co., 2. Rohit Hariharbhai Bhatt, 3. Bhavesh Hariharbhai Bhatt. ... Defendants. Ms.R.C.Shukla for the plaintiff. D.H.Mehta i/b. Jyoti Bhatt for the defendants. CORAM CORAM CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. : D.G. KARNIK, J. : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATED DATED DATED : 22nd February, 2005. : 22nd February, 2005. : 22nd February, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : ---- ---- ---- . Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that the suit against defendant No.3 be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly suit against defendant No.3 is dismissed for want of prosecution. 2. Learned counsel for the parties handed in Minutes of Decree on Admission duly signed by the plaintiff and defendant No.2 for self and as partner of defendant No.1. Both plaintiff and defendant No.1 are present in the Court and they are identified by their respective counsel. They admit their signatures. Counsel for both the parties have also signed the minutes. The minutes of decree taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. There shall be order in terms of the minutes. *****