h-- t <tm<?ir a**ira» 3^ -4]<(|(.j^ t9Tli+|<|<o, RKiiray ..u.^...^....iU.^ 3il^i 1ra9i' ('yi:!*'^) ai^r^ii ft-fi'* w s^v *><w fETITIONER Versus ftESPONDENTS 1. Anig Singh Rathi about 49 years Kharsiya, District ji, S/o Raghunath Singh, aged R/o Village Gurda, Tahsil |?aigarh (CG) 2. 3. 4. Pancblayat State of Chhat Department of DKS Bhawan, Director, Bhawan, Raipu Secretary, Dep. Government of Raipur (CG) l^sgarh, through - Se.cretary, panchayat and Social Welfare, Itaipur (CG) and Social Welfare, DKS •(CG) ju-tment of School Education, Chhattisgarh, DKS Bhavan, Director, Publi Raipur (CG) WMT PETITION UNDER IARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTl 6B: HON. SHRI DHIRENDRA MISIj[RA,_J 128-01-2009 Shri J.K Shastri, counsel for Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocatjs Heard. The petitioner has filed th) hnnexure P-5 dated 9.9.2003, wlji ^.bsorpdon of the petitioner wh^ pepartment of Panchayat & Social in the Department of School Educa| Learned counsel for the peti) Filed representations as per Anne^ |iave not yet been decided. He furtjher 4»p4i?t^t1^fftcft* ^f^S <Ri^R i;3tficign4?r Instructions, Pension Bada, ION OF INDIA he petitioner. for the State. s petition challenging the order of ereby the respondent has directed is working as Supervisor in the Welfare, as Upper: Division Teachers :ion. joner submits that the petitioner has :ures P-2 & P-3, however, the same submits that the petitioner is not ...^^^s^, si9!^c" &. '"• '•'sej... /^?5aaA l"l&» f,fc..~. '^ % ^-^.' -•"eE!BS»"-XI.HC—7g T 'T^ •^ii'Mini, ®iil'M'i<o, NIHWI S»*<1«1» ••W^200 SD^T 'T3RF (Tlf^^tl) Sil^tW Vt-»* W^ -afl^ sh*licf) TOIIW ^ito an^i 2-. 'Stil^l-ql^ 'RFRTf ^f 'fet3l' ^t^K ^sifimsii^i V- ^?" ffi ^ressing this petition at this stage, ^etailed representation raising all l|)efdre the competent authority }epresentation being made, the cor] ihowever, he may be allowed to make lis grievances raised in this petition of the respondents and on such apetent authority of tbe respondents t>e further directed to decide the sarfie within specified period. On the other hand, learned c| Ijias no objection ifthe petition is di^ In view of the above submis^ <|he instant petition.is disposed of] Ijresh detailed representation raisij j)etition before the eompetent aut| i^ays from today, along with copy [epresentation being made, the coi) thall consider and decide the same ounsel for the State submits that he •posed of with the aforesaid direction. ton of leaned counsel for the parties, with liberty to the. petitioner to file ig his all grievances raised in this ^iority of the resporidents within 10 of the petition and order. On such ipetent authority of the respondents on its own merits, in accordance with iw, expeditiously, preferably withiiji a period of su? weeks from the date >f receipt of the representation. If any grievance still remains; ivailable under the law. The petitioner is allowed to cd ill the representation is decided. Certified copy as per rules. the petitioner may avail the remedy ntinue in the present place of posting Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge 4-