IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6500 of 2010 Decided on: 18.11.2010 Mehar Singh & Others ….Petitioners Versus H.R.T.C. ….Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr.Justice V.K. Sharma, Judge For the petitioner: Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayers: “i) That the Respondent-Corporation be directed to consider the case of the petitioners for regularization as per the policy/instructions of the State Government and as have been done in the case of similarly situated persons in the past in the Respondent-Corporation with all consequential benefits with effect from the date they had completed 8 years of regular contractual service with the Respondent Corporation. ii) That the Respondent Corporation be directed to consider the case/representation made by the petitioners within a time bound manner as per the policy/instructions of the State Government and as per the past practice without any discrimination.” 2. It is seen that the representations filed by the petitioners are pending consideration before the 2 respondent. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of as follows. There will be a direction to the respondent to look into the representations filed by the petitioners and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioners. 3. The Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. ( Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. November 18, 2010 (Justice V.K.Sharma) (tilak/vt) Judge