IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13230 of 2009 NIREKHAN BHAGAT son of Late Ujari Bhagat, resident of village Korian P.S. Bheldi Dist. Saran …………….. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……………… Opposite party. ----------- 2 29.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that father-in-law and mother-in-law are to be treated at par and since the mother-in-law has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 02.02.2009 in Cr.Misc. No. 53041 of 2008, the petitioner should be given the same indulgence. I have perused the order dated 2.2.2009 in Cr.Misc. No.53041 of 2008, there is no similarity of allegation and evidence in so far as the present petitioner is concerned. The Court has been indulgent towards the mother-in- law because by virtue of the fact that she was aged lady, the present petitioner deserves no similarity treatment as accused mother-in-law. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, namely, Nirekhan Bhagat is rejected. Bibhash (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) 2