Crl. Rev. No. 1651 of 2009 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Rev. No.1651 of 2009 Date of Decision: December 2, 2010 Kuldeep Singh …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr.Abhishekh Chautala, AAG, Punjab. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Through instant revision petition, the order dated April 11, 2009 dismissing the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. for summoning Nachhatar Singh, Pargat Singh, Mehar Kaur, Mohinder Singh, Jaswinder Singh and Charanjit Kaur as additional accused has been challenged. The learned Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib while considering the application Crl. Rev. No. 1651 of 2009 [2] under Section 319 Cr.P.C. has taken into consideration the suicide note Ex.PD; the statement of Dr.Neeraj Kakkar, PW2 and the other circumstances and arrived at a conclusion that the deceased had never complained about harassment regarding the demand of dowry by the accused persons and that it was Nachhatar Singh, father-in-law who had taken the deceased to hospital and that the deceased was residing separately with her husband. The parameters laid down in Micheal Machedo Vs. CBI and another, 2000 (2) RCR (Crl.) 75 have been taken into consideration while dismissing the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. After considering the abovesaid circumstances, I do not find any ground to interfere in the well reasoned order. Dismissed. December 2, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE