IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 23RD OCTOBER 2009 / 1ST KARTHIKA 1931 Mat.Appeal.No. 403 of 2009(F) ---------------------------- OP.1039/2007 of FAMILY COURT, KOTTAYAM .................... APPELLANTS/ RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. SAJIMON, S/O. PADMANABHA PILLAI, POOVAKULATH HOUSE, KARIMPANI P.O., MATTAKKARA, AKAAKUNNAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM. 2. PADMANABHA PILLAI, POOVAKULATH HOUSE, KARIPANAI P.O., MATTAKKARA, AKALAKUNNAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM. 3. BHAGEERATHIAMMA, POOVAKULATH HOUSE, KARIMPANI P.O.,MATTAKKARA, AKALAKUNNAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE RESPONDENT: PETITIONER --------------- INDULEKHA, D/O. THULASIDASAN PILLAI, LAL BHAVAN, CHENNAMKARI EAST P.O., KAVALAM, ALAPPUZHA DIST. ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------------ Mat.Appeal No.403 of 2009 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of October, 2009 JUDGMENT BASANT, J. The learned counsel for the respondent Sri.Saijo Hassan submits that all outstanding disputes have been settled and the respondent/wife has received amounts in full satisfaction of the impugned order passed. In these circumstances, the counsel submits that this Appeal can be allowed and the impugned order set aside. The learned counsel for the appellant also submits that this Appeal may now be allowed in the light of the settlement and the impugned order may be set aside. 2. No joint statement has been filed. But we accept the submission of the counsel Sri.Saijo Hassan on behalf of the respondent and the request of the learned counsel for the appellant. 3. In the result, this appeal is allowed as agreed. The impugned order is set aside. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) rtr/- 2