: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.930 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.930 OF 2008 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.930 OF 2008 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1574 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL NO.1574 OF 2008 FIRST APPEAL NO.1574 OF 2008 Sakina Bhopali w/o Saeedbhai & Ors. ...Applicants. v. 1.Sayyed Mohsin Ibrahim Shah Qadri ...Respondent. Ms.N.M.Baig, adv. for Applicants. Sayeed Aktar, adv. for Respondent No.2. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 4th August, 2008. DATE : 4th August, 2008. DATE : 4th August, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. There is a dispute about right of the defendants to offer prayers in Dargah and performing other activities like holding Urus in the suit property, which was purchased by the plaintiffs in 1935. In response to issue no.4, the trial Court held that the defendants and in all general public have right of access to the Dargah to offer Fatehas. However, the trial Court restrained the defendants, their representatives and agents from arranging functions like Urus, Qawalli and taking any procession in the suit property and also from collecting or raising any funds, etc. in the name of said Dargah. I have perused the order dated 27-9-2000 in Notice of : 2 : Motion No.3506 of 2000, which was taken out by the plaintiffs. That order reveals that the defendants had made a statement before the Court that they were not personally organising any Mela, Urus, etc. and they had also no intention of putting any advertisement in respect of any Qawalli, etc. and they would not take up any procession. According to them, they would only participate if such functions are organised by the others. Taking into consideration that statement made by the defendants before the trial Court and the decree passed by the trial Court, I find that by the said decree/order, right of the defendants to offer Fatehas or prayers at the said Dargah has been protected and they are restrained from arranging other functions like Urus, Qawalli, etc. which according to their admission, they are not doing. Therefore, no interim relief is required. 3. Therefore, application stands disposed off accordingly. 4. Certified Copy expedited. (J.H.BHATIA, J.) (J.H.BHATIA, J.) (J.H.BHATIA, J.)