BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Second day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16904 of 2011 ANTONY IRUDHAYARAJ ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THANGACHIMADAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT, CR.NO.140/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. R.VELMURUGAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 448, 294(b), 427, 379(NP), 506(ii) I.P.C. and Section 4 of Woman Harassment Act, in Crime No.140 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Heard Mr.R.Velmurugan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that on 14.12.2011 at about 3.00 p.m. the petitioner/accused went to the school of the defacto complainant and said to have abused in filthy language and had broken the chairs, worth about Rs.150/- (Rupees One hundred and Fifty only) and threatened to kill the defacto complainant and therefore, a case has been registered against the petitioner. 5. Considering the submissions made by both sides and also considering the gravity of the offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Rameswaram, Ramnad District, subject to the following stringent conditions:- https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ (i) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.150/- (Rupees One Hundred and Fifty only) to the credit of Crime No.140 of 2011 before the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Rameswaram, Ramnad District; (ii) On such deposit the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Rameswaram, Ramnad District; (iii) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation; and (iv) The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 22/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMESWARAM, RAMNAD DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM. 3. INSPECTOR OF POLICE THANGACHIMADAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. R.VELMURUGAN Advocate SR.No.45213 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16904 of 2011 Date :22/12/2011 RJ/26.12.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/