IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21534 of 2011 Deepak Mandal, S/O-Late Bhupat Mandal Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03 09.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner being husband of the deceased is languishing in jail custody since 10.01.2011 in a case registered under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Admittedly, the marriage of the petitioner had taken place with the deceased in the year 2005 and deceased died in the year 2010. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that two circumstances, as emerged out from the first information report itself, make the prosecution case doubtful. It is contended by him that as per first circumstance, after performance of the marriage, deceased led her conjugal life happily and peacefully with the petitioner and in course of aforesaid married life, she produced two children and according to second circumstance, the alleged demand was made first time soon before her death. It is further contended by him that the informant has admitted in her statement that she got telephonic message from the petitioner about the ailment of the deceased. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with 2 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Kahalgaun P.S. Case No. 85 of 2010. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)