IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.45655 of 2008 MUKESH SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.4064 of 2009 LEELA SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 18.03.2009 S.Sb/- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is no probability of remaining continue of the demand for six years from the marriage after giving birth of three children. For petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 4064 of 2009 he is brother-in-law (dewar) of the deceased standing on similar footing of another brother-in-law who has been allowed anticipatory bail. Finding the case on footing of the co-accused, petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 4064 of 2009, namely, Leela Sah is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Neema Chandpur P.S. Case No. 62 of 2008. So far petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 45655 of 2008 is concerned, he is husband solely responsible for death of the deceased. Differences are shown, may be on point of demand otherwise, but the death is unnatural in matrimonial house within seven years of the marriage, so he deserves no bail. Accordingly his prayer for bail is rejected. (Mandhata Singh, J.) - 2 -