-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 105 OF 2008 Aniruddha Vasant Bhor ).. Petitioner Versus The Commissioner, Thane Municipal ) Corporation and others ).. Respondents Mr Avinash H Fatangare for the Petitioner. Mr V P Malvankar, Assistant Government Pleader, for the State. Mr S S Pathak for Respondent No.3. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J. & A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 14TH AUGUST 2008. P.C. We have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner. We are of the considered view that the controversies raised in the present Public Interest Litigation do not satisfy any of the ingredients for maintainability of said Petition. The allegations of the Petitioner are in relation to the activities of the school run by the Municipal Corporation. He is at liberty to approach the concerned Respondents and bring to their notice his grievance. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the respective -2- Respondents state that they will look into the matter in accordance with law. 3. In view of this, there is no need for this Court to interfere in this matter in its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE A. P. DESHPANDE, J.