IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2010 / 8TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 20157 of 2010(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SANTHOSH K.S., S/O.LATE SANKARA PILLAI, KAVUKATTU HOUSE, EDAVATTY P.O., THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. (WORKING AS L.D.C. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, ADIMALY P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT). BY ADV. SRI.C.J.JOY SMT.VALSAMMA KURIAN JOSE RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. ASST.DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER (GL), OFFICE OF THE ASST.DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER (GL),I IDUKKI. BY GOVERNMENT PLADER RI. ARAVINDHKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.20157 OF 2010 (T) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T Grievance of the petitioner is that the transfer as sought by him was not given when Ext.P9 order was issued. Against Ext.P9 petitioner has filed Ext.P10 appeal before the first respondent. He sought a direction for expeditious disposal of Ext.P3 appeal. I heard the Government Pleader also. 2. Having regard to the pendency of Ext.P10 before the first respondent, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P10 as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 6 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a coy of this writ petition. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the first respondent for compliance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :