IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC (T) No. 85 of 2008 Decided on: 29.11.2010 Suman Sachar …Petitioner Versus Sh. S.C. Roy and others …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : None. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Anand Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. _______________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : In sequel to order dated 8.10.2010, supplementary affidavit stands filed. A bare perusal of the same reveals that the due and admissible salary has already been released to the petitioner. Consequently, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge November 29, 2010 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?