IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.24312 of 2010 Between: P.Surekha ..... PETITIONER (S) AND The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate and others .....RESPONDENT(S) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.24312 of 2010 ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner is that the second respondent, though registered the complaint given by her against the unofficial respondents on 28.06.2010 as Crime No.136 of 2010 on the file of the Vikarabad Police Station, for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 468, 506 and 120-B of IPC, is not investigating into the same and therefore she seeks a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to complete the investigation and file charge sheet before the Magistrate concerned. The case of the petitioner is that herself and respondent Nos.4 and 5 have jointly purchased the premises bearing H.No.4- 2-1098 admeasuring 447.22 sq. yards situated at Ananthagiri Road, Vikarabad, through sale deed dated 19.01.2010, and thereafter respondent No.3 who is the husband of respondent No.4 established a Bar and Restaurant in the said premises without the consent and knowledge of the petitioner by forging her signature in the lease deed submitted before the excise authorities. Therefore, she lodged a complaint before the second respondent which in turn was registered as a case in Crime No.136 of 2010 as stated above. Heard both sides. Perused the material available on record. The learned Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submits that though there is no dispute that a case as stated above has been registered, from the legal opinion obtained, the dispute of the petitioner is civil in nature and, accordingly, permission was also obtained from the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Vikarabad, to refer the complaint of the petitioner as ‘civil in nature’ and final report under Section 173 of Cr.P.C. will be filed before the Court by following due process of law within one week. In view of the submission, nothing survives for adjudication and no orders need be passed in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________ N.V.RAMANA, J. 9th November 2010 CVRK