HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^^ Sjnale Bench : Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh. J. Miscellaneous Appeal (C.l hto.476 of 2008 Aopellant Jairam SSngh, S/o Ramprasad, aged Applicant 28 years, r/o Village Jarhadjh, P.S. Balrampur, Post - Mahara|ganj. Tahsil Pal, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) versus Resoondents Non-ApDlicants Gajendra Prasad Singh, S/o Sharda Prasad Singh, aged about 28 years, Occupatton - Business, R/o Sattipara, Bevan Colony, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) United India Insurance Company. through Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd., Branch Office, Near Ram Mandir, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehides Act 1988 Present: Ms. Sharmila Singhai with Shri SanjayAgrawal, counset for the appellant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 11th day ofApril, 2008) Heard on I.A.No.1 for condonatjon of delay in filing the appeal. For the reasons mentfoned in the applfcation I.A.No.1, it is allowed and delay is condoned. (2) Heard on admission. (3) The appellant is aggrieved by the award dated 31-10-2007 passed in Claim Case No.33/2003 by the Jst Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ambjkapur (henceforth 'the TribunaJ'), whereby in an injury case compensatton of Rs.39,090/- was awarded. lli 1 (4) The claimant had suffered fracture of the fibula bone of the teft leg. The Tribunal awarded compensation as under: SJ.No. Head 1. Actual expenses incurred in treatment 2. Costofattendant 3. Spedat diet 4. Expenses towards conveyance 5. Loss of earning for sb( months 6. Pain and suffering Total= Amount (Rs.l 1,040 1.050 2,000 1,000 9,000 25,000 39.090 (5) Considering the injuri^ sutfered by the claimant, in my (S consfclered opinion, the compensation awarded bythe Tribunal isjust and reasonabte compensation and does not call for any enhancement. (6) The appeal is dismissed at the stage of admisston. Sd/- DiUpRaosahd.Deshmukh Judge Gopal