IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 800 OF 2010 SHRI. ANTONIO MARIO RODRIGUES (SINCE DEC.) AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus SHRI. JOHN RODRIGUES AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. V. P. Thali, advocate for the petitioners. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 13th December, 2010 P.C: By this petition, the petitioners challenge order dated 24/9/2010 passed by the Civil Judge,Senior Division at Bicholim rejecting the objection raised by the petitioner/plaintiff to the cross examination of Pw3 by the defendant on the ground that Pw3 was summoned only to produce documents in terms of Order 16 Rule 6 of C.P.C. Perusal of the impugned order discloses that after the witness i.e Pw3 produced relevant documents,he was cross examined on behalf of the defendants extensively and only thereafter the objection was raised. On this factual background I am not inclined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. It is made clear that dismissal of this petition would not mean that the procedure adopted by the trial court is correct. I have dismissed the petition solely on the ground that the petitioner has approached this Court after extensive cross examination of Pw3. In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed. A. P. LAVANDE, J. ap/-