IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 10401 of 2008. Decided on: 20.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Pramodh Singh Patiyal. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening events. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 20, 2010. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.