IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 9545 OF 2004. PETITION NO. 9545 OF 2004. PETITION NO. 9545 OF 2004. Mr.Pradeep Yeshwant Raut. ... Petitioner. V/s. The Divisional Controller, Maharashtra Road Transport Corporation, Palghar. ... Respondent. A.B.Desai for the petitioner. G.S.Hegde for the respondent. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 13th April 2006. DATED: 13th April 2006. DATED: 13th April 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Heard learned for the petitioner. 2. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The view taken by the Court below is a reasonable and possible view. No perversity is demonstrated by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The impugned order can hardly be said to be a perverse order. 3. Petition is, thus, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)