IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 8927 of 2011-C and other below mentioned writ petitions. Decided on: 20th October, 2011. 1. CWP No. 8927 of 2011-C. Arjun Singh Kanwar. Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 2. CWP No. 8928 of 2011-C. Rakesh Kumar. Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 3. CWP No. 8929 of 2011-C. Sudesh Bala. Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 4. CWP No. 8930 of 2011-C. Sandeep Kumar. Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 5. CWP No. 8931 of 2011-D. Raghuwar Dutt. Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 6. CWP No. 8932 of 2011-D. Sunder Singh. Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 7. CWP No. 8933 of 2011-D. Surender Kumar. Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 8. CWP No. 8936 of 2011-D. Ashok Kumar. Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 9. CWP No. 8938 of 2011-D. Amita Thakur. Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 10. CWP No. 8940 of 2011-D. Chandan Kumar. Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 2 11. CWP No. 8941 of 2011-E. Bimla Devi. Vs. State of H.P. & anr. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioners : Mr. Narender Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG and Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Dy. AG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petitions are filed with the following prayer: “(i) to issue writ of mandamus directing the respondent department to release the service benefits for the period rendered by the petitioner on tenure basis including all consequential benefits.” 2. The petitioners claim that the respondent-department may be directed to release the service benefits during the tenure period of service rendered by them including all consequential benefits. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court dated 16.12.2010 rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010 titled as Ravi Kumar vs. State of H.P. & others. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this 3 judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred to above. 3. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 20th October, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (tr) Judge.