1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.42/2010. (Mr.Vishnu s/o Radhakishan Solate Vs. Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Bahuuddesiya Seva Sanstha, Ambad and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .Mr.RJ Godbole, Adv. for petitioner;; Mr.SB Tale, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3; Mrs.SD Shelke, AGP for Resp.No.4. *** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 4 th October, 2010. ... 1) Heard learned Counsel for parties. 2) Learned Counsel, representing Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 candidly states, i) there was no termination of the petitioner; ii) All the arrears of wages of the petitioner are cleared and if not cleared, will be cleared in time-bound schedule. The ground of volitional absence of the petitioner, being not substantiated, Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 shall furnish the salary bills of the petitioner, peon for the period from 14.3.2007 to 18.10.2008 (alleged absentism from the duties). If the Education Officer approves the same, necessary payment of wages be disbursed to the petitioner without any demur by 2 crediting the amount thereof to his bank account. 3) Both the counsel agree, the observations of learned Presiding Officer of the School Tribunal made against the petitioner shall not be weighed during the inquiry, if conducted by the Respondent Nos.1 to 3. 4) It is made clear that the above referred absence, should not be treated and counted as `break in service’ of the petitioner. 5) With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/