IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CONTEMPT CASE No.896 OF 2009 Between: B. Surekha … Petitioner AND 1 Sri Dinesh Reddy 2 Sri Dhananjaya Rao … Respondents The Court made the following : ORDER: This Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the action of the respondent in not implementing the order, dated 28.12.2004, in W.P.No.24392 of 2004, passed by this Court. 2. In pursuance of the directions to the respondent in order, dated 28.12.2004, in W.P.No.24392 of 2004, passed by this Court, the respondent passed an order stating that the compassionate appointments cannot be granted, however, the petitioner is at liberty to take Rs.1,00,000/- as additional monetary benefit in lieu of compassionate appointment. 3. As the orders are complied with, no further orders are required in this contempt case. Therefore, in view of the admission made by the learned counsel for respondent in passing the order with regard to payment of additional monetary benefits, the respondent is directed to pay the amount to the petitioner within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ (K.C.BHANU, J) Dated: 21st August, 2009. KL