WP(C) 2969/2008 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI The petitioner who is an employee under the Board of Sports contends that he is entitled to continue in service upto the age of 60 years which he would be attai ning on 9.6.2010. Instead the petitioner has been made to retire at the age of 58 with effect from 9.6.2008. Even if this writ petition is to be allowed no benefit can be given to the petit ioner due to the circumstances noted above. The interpretation of the law which will be required to answer the claim of the petitioner must be avoided as the sa me will not benefit the petitioner but may benefit or work to the prejudice of o ther persons who are not before the Court. In the above circumstances, the Court understands that there is no live issue fo r adjudication in this writ petition. The writ petition is closed as infructuous . The retirement benefits of the petitioner on the basis of the retirement made wi th effect from 9.6.2008, if has not been settled in the meantime ,shall be forth with settled.