17. cr appln 789-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 789 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 460 OF 2010 Sudam Sakharam Galande & Anr. .. Applicants Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Ms. Sharmila S. Kaushal i/b Mr. R. Sathyanarayanan for the Applicants Mr. S.A. Shaikh, APP for the State. CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER,2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicants and learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants-original accused nos. 1 and 3 have been convicted and sentenced to RI for three years. The appeal preferred by them against the said order has been admitted. Now, the applicants are seeking bail. 3. Learned advocate for the applicants stated that besides this case, the applicants have a clean record. She further stated that the applicants were on bail during the trial and they have not misused the liberty granted to them. Both these statements have not been controverted by 1 17. cr appln 789-10.doc learned APP. Moreover, it is seen that the sentence is only for three years and the appeal is not likely to come up for hearing in the near future. Thus, looking to the above facts, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicants. Hence, the order: O R D E R 1. Applicants i.e Sudam Sakharam Galande and Vithabai Sakharam Galande be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- [Rs. Twenty Thousand Only] each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The Applicant shall report to the Mhaswad Police Station once in a month till disposal of the appeal. 2. Application is allowed in above terms. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2 17. cr appln 789-10.doc 3