%§a.e-”2m s IxsfN x v. "’ ' .Xag5w ‘. x N THE H? E‘COURT PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1 § OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION [c1 No..... ($5 [2005“ cwé/wV gh Bedi, S/o Late di, aged about 5Q “rs‘ , 0‘“ R/o Main ROad, Sitapur, Distt.— V «Indrajeet Sin “i Jyoti Singh Be “Twg Surguja, C.G. VERSUS thority, 4'“ Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur. ARTICLE 226 OF THE WRIT PETITION UNDER ’1 Regiona1 Transport Au r Chhattisgarh at Raipur. CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI—HC-78 EW,WWW mm m9! ) “In 200 Wmwmm WWW WW%WW %?3T%w3n%$ 19.1 .2007: Shri Anshul Shrivastava couhs el for the petitioner. Shri Parag Kotecha PL for the respondentlstate, The petitioner has preferrex respondent No.1 be directed to consk of regular permit for the route SitapL and Sliapur to Ambikapur via Mahesh The petitioner made the abo 12.072006 but the respondent No.1 i Prayer made by the learned c application of the petitioner in accordance with Iaw, to which learned counsel for j this writ petition with a prayer that ler the application of the petitioner for grant ir to Ambikapur via Bataoli, Raghunathpur our, Bataoii, Lamgaon and return trip. ve application before respondent No.1 on s not deciding the same, No1 may be directed to consider the. ounsel for the petitioner is that respondent the State has no obiection. Having heard learned counssr=l for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, application of the petitioner regarding in accordance with law within a perio copy of this order With the direction aforesaid the petition is disposed of Certihed copy as per rules respondent N001 is directed to consider the grant of regular permit on the above route i of three months from the date of receipt of sat Dhirendra Mtshra Judge P.T.O.