IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12013 of 2011 PAPPU SAO & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 406, 418, 323, and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the Deepak Kumar is that the complainant gave some money for taking insurance but the insurance was taken in the name of Deepak Kumar in which the complaint was shown as his wife. It is also alleged that these petitioners came and took away one attaichee containing original sale deed and Rs. 5,000/-in cash and took away one golden chain worth about Rs. 17,000/-. It appears that for the accusation levelled against the petitioner cognizance has not been taken by the learned Court below and the thrust if accusation is against the Deepak Kumar. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the - 2 - petitioners namely, 1. Pappu Sao, and 2. Ranjan Sao, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Hilsa (Nalanda) in connection with complaint case no. 358C of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. Ibrar/- ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)