IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12605 of 2005 1. ABBAS ANSARI 2. MD. BAHAUDDIN 3. MD. RABBANI, ALL SONS OF RAJ MOHAMMAD ANSARI, Petitioner NOS.2 AND 3 ARE MINORS AND UNDER THE GUARDIANSHIP OF THEIR FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, RAJ MOHAMMAD ANSARI, ALL RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE-DHABARI GOPAL, P.S. MASHRAKH, DISTRICT-SARAN …PETITIONERS Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE ADDL.COLLECTOR, SARAN AT/P.0. AND P.S. CHAPRA DISTRICT SARAN 4. THE D.C.L.R. MARHAURA, P.O. AND P.S. MARHAURA, DISTRICT SARAN 5. SADAQUAT HUSSAIN 6. RAZZAQUE HUSSAIN BOTH SONS OF SAHMAD HUSSAIN, RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE DHABARI GOPAL, P.S. MASHRAKH, DISTRICT SARAN. …RESPONDENTS ----------- 03. 20.04.2011 The writ petitioners are purchasers. They are raising a grievance with respect to the order dated 14.09.2004, passed by respondent-appellate authority in Appeal No. 15/2003 (Annexure-8) under the provisions of Bihar Land Reforms(Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus land) Act,196 (for short ‘the Act’). On hearing the parties and after going through materials on records, it is evident that the said order is revisable in terms of section 32 of the Act which is held to be the final court of fact. This Court, therefore, declines to interfere with the order assailed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that revision now to be preferred by petitioners would be barred by limitation. Let the petitioners file revision application before the 2 appropriate court/authority within five weeks from today along with a petition seeking condonation of delay also annexing therewith copy of the present order. If any such revision application is filed within aforesaid time, the revisional authority shall condone the delay and dispose of the matter on its own merit after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties. The writ application stands disposed of. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )