1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (Review) NO.922/2008 IN Appeal Against Order NO.110/2006 (Decided) Dipak s/o Shri Sureshrao Gadge ...Versus... Namdeo s/o Shri Punba Moon and others -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Shri Rohit Deo, Adv. for applicant] CORAM:- A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED :- 09.04.2009 Notice for final disposal was already given to the respondents, but despite several chances there is no appearance on behalf of the respondents. Heard learned Counsel for the review applicant. Reading of the impugned order under review will clearly show that there is error apparent on the face of record in the observation that no payment was actually passed to the proposed vendor. Learned Counsel for the review applicant points out that in fact payment of Rs.7,50,000/- was made about which there is recital in the agreement. 2 In that view of the matter, this review application is allowed. Order dated 2.7.2008 in Appeal Against Order No.110/2006 is set aside. The said Appeal Against Order be now placed for admission before the appropriate Court. Misc. Civil Application stands disposed of. No order as to costs. JUDGE ssw