IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 22ND FEBRUARY 2008 / 3RD PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 6186 of 2008(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ C.ABDUL MAJEED, S/O.ERAMULLAN, AGED 48 YEARS, DOCUMENT WRITER, SREEKANTAPURAM POST, TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.T.MADHAVANUNNI SRI.V.A.SATHEESH RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE REGISTRATION DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL (LICENSING), OFFICE OF REGISTRATION INSPECTOR GENERAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, KANNUR, THALASSERY POST, KANNUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 6186 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: February 22, 2008 JUDGMENT Ext.P1 is a show cause notice issued to the petitioner against which the petitioner had given his reply. Considering the reply, the 1st respondent issued Ext.P2 informing that the explanation offered was unsatisfactory and that further action will be initiated against him. It is challenging this communication, this writ petition has been filed. 2. In my view, this writ petition is premature. All that is stated in Ext.P2 is that further action will be taken. If and when further action is taken and ultimately if any punishment is imposed on the petitioner, it is only at that stage can the petitioner question the proceedings. Hence without prejudice to any one of the contentions, I close this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-