IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46152 of 2009 DILIP KUMAR SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 7 15.9.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. There is allegation of torture for non- fulfilment of demand of dowry that is denied referring allegation made in the complaint petition itself that after marriage every thing was O.K., wife and husband resided happily for some time. Thereafter on instigation of rest of family members, this petitioner started to demand Rs. 20,000/- for running a business. For the differences, there was Panchaiti then only complainant-wife was accepted meant to say accused persons accepted not to make any demand but again there is allegation about demand and torture for that only which is stressed to disbelieve the allegation for refusal of anticipatory bail. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten 2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in Complaint Case No. 624/2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)