IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14919 of 2010 JITENDRA KUMAR CHOUDHARY SON OF MUKHATAR CHOUDHARY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.22583 of 2010 MIRTUNJAY KUMAR PANKAJ SON OF MUTHU RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 7.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioners are not named in the first information report nor have been named by the victim concerned. However, from perusal of the case diary it appears that the petitioners were arrested where the victim had been detained and named in the confessional statement the co-accused Anil Kumar Das, who was the driver of the vehicle, who has also disclosed the entire game plan. In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. The prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial in view of the serious nature of the offence. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )