THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5135 of 2009 ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 09.10.2009 in I.A. No.332 of 2009 in O.S. No.94 of 2006 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Hindupur, whereunder and whereby the application filed under Order IX Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’) to set aside the exparte order dated 19.9.2007, was dismissed. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The suit is filed for partition of plaint ‘A’ and ‘B’ schedule properties. The first respondent herein is the plaintiff, and the petitioners and respondents 2 and 3 are defendants, in the suit. The petitioners were set exparte on 19.9.2007 and now the case is posted for arguments. It seems the petitioners engaged an advocate by name Kum.Uma, who shifted her practice to Hyderabad and therefore they were not aware of the passing of the exparate order. Therefore, sufficient reason has been shown by the petitioners as there is a possibility for the advocate who was engaged by them, not informing them about the shifting of her practice to Hyderabad. Written statement of the petitioners was already filed. In view of the fact that substantial rights of the parties are involved in the suit, which can be decided in the suit itself, the petitioners can be given an opportunity to oppose the matter and set forth their claim. 5. The Civil Revision Petition is, accordingly, allowed and consequently, I.A. No.No.332 of 2009 shall stand allowed. No costs. --------------------- (K.C.Bhanu, J.) 2.2.2011 DRK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5135 of 2009 2.2.2011 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 5135 of 2009 2.2.2011 Between: Prabhavathi & others …Petitioners And Ediga Ramachandrappa & others …Respondents