IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12305 of 2011 AMLESH KUMAR SINGH @ AMLESH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. ----------- 2. 03.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Though on protest, the cognizance has been taken since the accusation was found false during investigation. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that it is the complainant who has driven out the petitioner from the matrimonial house. Though the petitioner is still ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour but at the behest of father of the petitioner 107 Cr.P.C. proceeding was also initiated between the parties. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for six months 2 in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 1745C of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Begusarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Let the learned court below issue notice to the complainant and on her appearance petitioner will accompany the complainant to matrimonial house. If the complainant refuses to reside with the petitioner then she has to allow the petitioner to reside in the matrimonial house. The provisional bail of the petitioner will be confirmed in either eventualities. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)