IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12501 of 2010 ROHIT DOME @ ROHIT RAM, SON OF BAIJU RAM @ BAIJU DOME Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02. 22.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the first information report and subsequently, his complicity arose in the confessional statement of the co-accused but neither he was put on test identification parade nor has any recovery been made from his possession. In view of such, let the petitioner above named who is in custody since 06.04.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge VI, Patna in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 33 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give - 2 - an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Saurabh (Anjana Prakash, J.)