HKM COURT,OF\CHHATrriSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) No. 2491 of2008 PETITIONERS RE8PONDENT. 1. Ramnarayan Agrawal Son of Late Balram Das Ji Agrawal, aged about 55 years, Proprietor: M/s. Satyam Traders, resident of Samta Colony, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Smt Parwati Devi AgrawaL wife of Shii Raiimai'ayaii Agrawal, agcd about 50 years, Proprietor: M/s. Shivam Jute Udyoug, Bhanpur, Raipur, resident of Samta Colony, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Akliiles Agrawal Son of SIiri Ranmarayaii Agrawal, aged about 32 years, Proprietor: M/s. Goel Jute Udyog, resident of Samta Colony, Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Ministiy of Food & Suppiies/Mmistiy of Law, Mantraiaya, D.K.S.Bhawan- Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF TIIE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Ilo2i?Ue_StinSatish_K.A@u|ioti^J. Present: Sliri B.P.Shaniia, Advocate forthe petitioners. Sliri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General fortlie State/respondeiit. ORALORDER (Passed on 25tn day of Septsmber, 2008) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that since the Chainiian and Member have been appomted m the Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and the matter is listed for hearing, thus, fhis petition has become infmctuous. Leamed comisei appearing for the State/respondent does not controvert the said submission. Accordmgly, the petition is dismissed as having become iniructuous. No order asto costs. 3. Consequently, I.A No. 1, application fbr appropriate orders, also stands disposed o£ Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Thalmr