IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated 28.2.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.4631 of 2011 Santhi Castings Works, HTSC No.304, Kumarapuram, Narasimmanaickenpalayam Post, P.B.No.5506 Coimbatore District, represented by its Manager, M.Bakthavachalam. ... Petitioner -Vs.- 1.Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, represented by its Secretary, 19-A, Rukmini Lakshmipathy Salai, (Marshall's Road), Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 3.The Superintending Engineer, Tuticorin Electricity Distribution Circle, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Tuticorin. ... Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to settle the total outstanding of Rs.71,32,951/-, viz., Rs.66,54,838/- towards arrears of energy charges for the energy supplied by the petitioner and Rs.4,78,111/- towards interest at the rate of 18% p.a. as provided under M.P.No.17 of 2009 dated 3.12.2009 issued by the first respondent and also further interest till the date of settlement within a stipulated time. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For petitioner : Mr.R.S.Pandiyaraj For respondents : Mr.J.Ravindran ----- O R D E R Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to settle the total outstanding of Rs.71,32,951/-, viz., Rs.66,54,838/- towards arrears of energy charges for the energy supplied by the petitioner and Rs.4,78,111/- towards interest at the rate of 18% p.a. as provided under M.P.No.17 of 2009 dated 3.12.2009 issued by the first respondent and also further interest till the date of settlement within a stipulated time. 2. Mr.J.Ravindran, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents electricity board. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. Petitioner made a representation dated 6.12.2010 to the third respondent in respect of the relief sought for. Now counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner's grievance will be met if the third respondent is directed to consider the said representation. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents states that the authority will consider the representation in accordance with law. 4. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents electricity board, the third respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation dated 6.12.2010 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. ts Sd/- Asst. Registrar //True Copy// Sub Asst. Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To 1.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, 19-A, Rukmini Lakshmipathy Salai, (Marshall's Road), Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 3.The Superintending Engineer, Tuticorin Electricity Distribution Circle, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Tuticorin. + 1 cc to Mr. R. S. Pandiaraj, Advocate SR No.14799 + 1 cc to Mr. J. Ravindran, Advocate SR No.14478 BK(CO) SR/10.3.2011 Order in W.P.No.4631 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/