IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.727 of 2010 3 4.5.2010 1. Asha Devi wife of Rajendra Bhushan Mauar 2. Draupadi Devi wife of Sri Shashi Bhushan Mauar Both residents of village Barki Kharaon P.S. Sahar in the district of Bhojpur ....... Petitioners VERSUS The State of Bihar ...... Opp. Party -------- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and leaned counsel for the informant. On behalf of the petitioners it has been submitted that they are ladies and but for certain allegations made by 11 year old daughter of the deceased lady, there is no evidence against them and some documents were refereed to for showing that the deceased was ill and referred to PMCH and she died in the way to Patna and was cremated at Patna. Learned counsel for the State has supported the facts discussed by the learned Sessions Judge for rejecting the prayer for anticipatory bail. He read the statement of Shrishti Kumari, 11 year old daughter of the deceased which shows that these petitioners also participated in confining the deceased in a room and in further assault. 2 The statement of ambulance driver and owner was also read out which creates suspicion that in fact ,only the dead body was carried to Patna and cremated there. In the facts of the case, now when the Dy.S.P. has supervised and found the case true under Sections 302, 201/34 of the IPC, it is not found to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. The prayer is rejected. This order shall not prejudice the case of the petitioners if they surrender and seek regular bail. (Shiva Kirti Singh,J.) sk