IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2009 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 17952 of 2009(L) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- A.HAMEED, MANICKAMCHERRY P.O., VALLIYADU, VATAKARA. BY ADVS. MR.PULIKKOOL ABUBACKER, MR.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. MANAGER, CHILAVATTOM L.P.SCHOOL, VALLIADYU, VATAKARA. 4. A.E.O., THODANNUR, VATAKARA. 5. M.SOUDHA, D/O.POYIL MAHMOOD, ASHIYANA, MEMUNDA, VATAKARA. R1, R2 & R4 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SMT. T.B. REMANI. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27/10/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.17952/2009-L: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE R.2. ON 28/02/2007. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY R.4. DTD. 11/04/2007. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 17/10/2007 IN W.P.(C).16439/2007. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.16439/07 DTD. 26/03/2009. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 08/02/2008. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE R.2. TO THE PETITIONER DTD. 07/07/2009. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 16/09/2009. EXT.P.8: COPY OF THE RULE 92 REVISION OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE GOVERNMENT ON 16/10/2009. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE. Prv. T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 17952 of 2009-L - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 27th day of October, 2009. JUDGMENT The petitioner had worked in the third respondent’s school from 27.10.1986 to 30.9.1991 as Arabic Teacher in a leave vacancy. The 5th respondent was appointed in a fresh vacancy, allegedly in violation of the claim of the petitioner under Rule 51-A of Chapter XIV-A K.E.R. Aggrieved by the steps taken to approve the appointment of the fifth respondent, the petitioner filed Ext.P1 revision petition before the Director of Public Instruction. 2. Ext.P7 is the order passed by the Director of Public Instruction in the matter. As per the said order, the revision petition filed by the petitioner stands rejected. Thereafter, the petitioner has filed Ext.P8 revision before the first respondent. It is prayed that Ext.P8 may be directed to be disposed of within a time limit. Ext.P8 is dated 16.10.2009. 3. There will be a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P8 after hearing the petitioner, the manager and other affected parties, if any, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It will be open to the petitioner to move the stay wpc 17952/2009 2 petition in the meanwhile, if so advised. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/