In the High Court of Judicature at Patna Cr. Misc. No.29292 of 2008 Ram Pravesh Yadav Vrs. The State of Bihar **** /2/ 22.07.2008 Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph 9 of the bail application. 2. Heard the counsel for the petitioner, the State as well as the informant. 3. Petitioner’s prayer for grant of bail was earlier rejected by order, dated 17.12.2007, with this observation that the prayer may be renewed after framing of the charge. Counsel for the petitioner submits that on 17.12.2007, when the prayer on behalf of the petitioner was rejected, charge had already been framed on 17.07.2007. The counsel appearing for the petitioner failed to bring this fact to the notice of the Court. It has further been submitted that out of six witnesses, the prosecution has already examined four and two other witnesses are doctor and the investigating officer, who are yet to be examined. 4. Considering the fact that petitioner is in custody since 06.11.2006 and except official witnesses all other witnesses have been examined, the prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner, Ram Pravesh Yadav, is allowed. He is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sessions Trial No. 33 of 2007 (Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 137 of 2006) to the satisfaction of Fast Track Court, IV, Gaya. 5. One of the bailers should be father or close relative of the petitioner. Another condition is that petitioner will attend the Court regularly. In case of unexplained absence his bail bond should be cancelled. Cp:3/S.A. ( Mridula Mishra, J. )