T.A. No.21 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH T.A. No.21 of 2011 Date of Decision. 13.01.2011 Meenu Thapar w/o Sanjay Thapar d/o Sh. Tarsem Lal Nayar, r/o House No.98, New Jwala Nagar, Maqsudan, Jalandhar .....Petitioner Versus Sanjay Thapar son of Raj Thappar resident of House No.93, The Mall, Ludhiana ......Respondent Present: Mr. Bhrigu Dutt Sharma, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. The application is for transfer of the proceedings from Ludhiana to Jalandhar. She is residing at Jalandhar which is about 60 kms away. The grievance of the applicant is that she has six years old child and it is not convenient for her to undertake frequent trips. She will have the benefit of travel allowance when there is an effective date of hearing and therefore, a distance of 60 kms cannot be taken to be so difficult for a person to travel to seek for a transfer. 2. I do not find any merit in the application. The application is dismissed. 3. However, the applicant will be at liberty to apply to the Court for maintenance under Section 24 and the Court will dispose of that application before calling upon the applicant to file the reply in the T.A. No.21 of 2011 -2- main proceedings. The maintenance may include suitable transport allowance on every one of the effective dates of hearing. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 13, 2011 Pankaj*