Ca? m3? In the High Court of Judicature of Chhattisgarh At Bilaspur w.P. JUG» /2oo3 3 BETWEEN Petitioner Dinker Rao Waretvar, aged about 47 years S/o Late Ganpal Rao, R/o C/1 New Adarsh e Nagar, Durg. Occupation agriculture and social worker, Durg Tah. & Distt. Durg (C.G.) And Respondents State of Chhattisgarh Through :- 1. Principal Secretary Ministry of Forest and Environment mantralaya D. K. Bhavan, Raipur 2. Principal Chief conservator Forest Department, Raipur 3. Conservator forest Circle, Durg (C.G.) Senior superintendent, police, Durg (C.G.) Public interest writ petition under article 226/of the constitution of lndia. / “ 3M ' 1 ‘ XI—HC-22 ; t WA ’ ESHMUKH J. 24 08 2005 Mr Aml Pandcv, Advoca appears on behalf of Mr Uttam Pandey, learned counsel for the euuoner. ' Mr. Sanjay SJ Agxawal, G. . for the State. Dr N K Shnkla, Senior v'ocate with K11. Ritu Mishm for the mtervener W P No 2683[2003 85 I A No 5462(2005 Thm wnt pehuon had been entertamed as a Pubhc Interest Litigatton (P.I.L.) as 1t was alleged 1n the pchnon that there was a large scale corruptbn with regard to purchaqe of gum in Damidi Lohara Rakahtota/ GaJnJI Soc1enes 1n Durg 1n the year 2001 2002 In the wnt pcuuon the peunomr hm prayed for a mandamus be 1ssued for mveshgatlon Into: sc of purchase of gum by the C B I and for directions to responde s No 1 to 4 to take departmental faction against ening o$cials and to prosecute them. IANo 5462/2005 has been med by the pennoner statmg that after nottce was lssued bv ths Court by order dated 7. 1.2004, the authormes have Inmated an action against the e T g o$cials and hence the Court may permLt the peu'tioner to withdraw this wn't petition and direct refund of the security amount. We find on a reading of :he return med on behalf of the intervener that a preliminary enquiry has been conducted into allegations and thereafter depart nental enquiry has been Imtiated (eaten XI—HC-22