1 rpc1-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE rpa REVIEW PETITION NO. 1 OF 2010 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2009 IN APPEAL NO. 657 OF 2002 M/s. M. B. Development Corporation .. Petitioners (Org.Resp.No. 2) V/s. Harishcandra B. Tiwari (since deceased) through heirs .. Respondents Dhurvakumar H. Tiwari & Ors. (Org.Appellants/ Plaintiffs) Mr. Navin Vimadalal i/b. M/s. Vimadalal & Co. for the Petitioners. Mr. R. A. Thorat for the Respondents. CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J. DATED : OCTOBER 22, 2010. P.C. This Petition is filed for review of the order dated 8th October, 2010. By the said order, the Civil Revision Application filed by the respondents herein was admitted and since the Civil Revision Application was in the nature of the Second Appeal, a question of law arising for consideration of the Court was framed. 2 rpc1-10 2. Mr. Vimadalal submits that the observation in the order that the claim of the respondents that they are licencees in respect thereof since prior to 1st February, 1973 and as such entitled to protection under the Rent Act is not considered by the Courts below is incorrect. According to him, the Courts below have already considered the claim of the respondents being tenants in respect of the premises. 3. The order sought to be reviewed is only an order admitting the Civil Revision Application. At the time of passing of the order, the Respondents were present before the Court. The admission of Civil Revision Application is a matter between the Revision Applicant and the Court. It is open for the petitioners to take up their contention at the time of final hearing of the Revision Application. Hence the review petition is dismissed. (SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J.)