^^ {\^t^ IN THE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATLiBE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. (S} N0. •siS'i /2006 PETITIONER ^.o' \^Xfrl .^..^ ^^'^0/ ^/5^y /^?" •.'ss<*// .f 1 < .ry' ^••' ,v y RESPONDENTS : ^ -<3^ ^'^ ^y <^ ^^' < 1 ] Dilip Kumar Misfara, Aged 26 years, S/o. Shri Rajkumar Mishra, 2] Yogeshwari Mishra W/o. Late Shri Prakash Mishra, Aged about 3 1 years, ^ 3] Umadatta Sahu S/o. Shri Aalakh Ram Sahu, Aged about 33 yeare, 4] Rohit Kumar Sahu, S/o. Shri Narayan Sahu, Aged about 27 years, AJI above R/o. Village SQmaikhyrd, Post Tahsil - Saja, Disfrict Dyrg (CG) VESSUS 1 ] State ofChhattis^rh, Through Secretary, Panchayat and Gramm Vikas Vibhag, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (Cbhattisgarh) Collector, Durg, District - Durg (Chhattisgarh) Chief Execytjve Qfficer, Janpad Pancliayat, Saja, District Dur^ (Chhattisgarh) 2] .^' o^ WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CQNS'njUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BiLASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATiSH K. AGNiHOTRI, J. WRjT PETSTION (S.) N0.5151 OFWQ6 Petitioners Resoondents versus Dilip Kumar Mishra and others State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. V.A.Goverdhan, counsei for the petitioners. Mr. Somesh Bajaj, Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents No.1 and 2. None appears for respondent No.3. QRDER (Passed on 21st of Septembsr, 2006) The petitioners appiied for appointment to the post of Shiks'na Karmi on the basis of appiications invited by Janpad Panchayat, Saja. According to the petitloners, they were found fit for interview in the first list. Thereafter, on review, the iist was re-prepared. It appears that, after substantiaiiy reducing the petitioners' marks on experience, the petitioners did not find place in the second list. 2. Belng aggrieved, the petitioners filed a statutory appeai before the Co!!ector on 22-8-2006 (Annexure P-12). In the meantlme, Janpad Panchayat initiated the process of reappointment. 5, 3. Be that as it may, the Collector, being statutory appellate authority, is under an obiigation to look tnto grievances of the appeai pending before him before process for appointment of other candidates is initiated. 4. Thus, the Collector - respondent No.2 is directed to decide the statutory appeai dated 22-8-2006 (Annexure P-12), being uninfluenced by any obssrvations made hereinabove, on merit, within a period oftwo vvesks from receipt of a copy of this order. 5. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd7- Certified copy be suppiied today. ^^ K.Agnihotri Judge <3opa! UIQU COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASEUB S.B. : HQN'BLE BR. SATiSKK.AGNIHOTRL A ll. WR1T PETiTION (S.) N0.5152 OF 2006 Petitjoner Respondents versus Yogesh Kumar Sharma The Stats Govt. of Chhattisgarh and anotner Pressnt : Mr. Somkant Verma, counsei for the petitioner. Mr. Somesh Bajaj, Government Advocate for the State/respondent No.1. None appears for respondent No.2. (Passed on 21" of September, 2006) The petitioner, working as Assistant, has been transferred from Chhattisgarh Grih Ntrman Mandai, Divislon No.1, Kabeer Nagar, Raipur to Project Division.Jashpur by order dated 12-9-2006 (Annexure p-1). 2. At this stage, the oniy contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner be granted liberty io make a representation before the respondents - authorities raising his health and other problems for reconsideration of his transfer order, to which learned Government Advocate appearing for t'ne State/respondent No.1 has no objection. - --—- ^- 3. in the facts and cireumstances of the case, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised, before the appropriate authority. On such representation being made by the petitioner, the appropriate authority shall decide his representation keeping in view humanilarian aspect, on merit, within a psriod ofthree weeks from the receipt of the rspresentation. 4. costs. Accordingiy, the petition stands dismissed. No order as to Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge So^ t'v w