@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (Art. 227) No. 671 of 2011 PETITIONER/: 1. Laxman Kaushik, Aged about 65 (Appeilants before the years, S/o Ram Roop kaushik, first appellate, Court) / (Respondents No. 3 8L 4) 2. Ramesh. Kaushik, Aged about - 36 years, S/o Laxman kaushik‘ Both R/o Village Dhaneli, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham .(C.G.) ., Versus RESPONDENTS/ z l. Smt. Dulari Bai, Widow of Derhadas, (Respondents before Aged about 64 years, R/o Nevaspur, the first appellate Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham Courts) (C.G.). $ Smt. Ga-uri Bai, W/o Ashok Das Aged about 44 years, R/o Daargaon (Near Regatola), Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.). Smt. Usha Bai, W/o Purandas, Aged about 46 years, R/o Dhanadeeh, (Near Khadsara Bazaar) District Durg (C.G.). Smt. Sunita, W/o Chintamani, Aged about 39 years, R/o Bairagi Beeja, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.). 4. Smt. Anita, W/o Shyamdas, Aged about 84 years, R/o vBhumiya 5., Sankara, Tahsil Simga, District Raipur (C.G.). 6. Ganesh Das, S/o Derha Das, Aged Abut 29 years, R/o Newaspur, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdharn (C.G.). Smt. Rohini Bai, W/o Dileshwar Das, Aged about 2.6 years, R/o Khairjhiti Kampa, Tahsil Saja, District Durg (C.G.). Smt. Sheela Bai, Widow of Dayal Das, Aged about 34 years, R/o Village Mungelideeh, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.). Geeta Bai, W/o Triveni, Aged about 59 years, V R/o Ruthleva, Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.). State of Chhattisgarh, Through the 10. Collector, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Ajit Singh, Advocate for the rcspondent Nos. 1 to 7. Shri Sumit Jhanwar, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 10. None for the respondent Nos. 8 86 9 although served. ORAL— ORDER (Passed on 11/07/2011) By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India petitioners have challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 20/1/2011 passed by District Judge, Kabirdham in civil appeal No. 28-A/20l l. / AQqér some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw this petition and submits thast Court below has already fixed the case for final hearing on 5/8/2011. Prayer allowed. Consequently, petition is dismissed as Withdrawn. However, considering the nature of order impugned Court below is directed to decide the appeal as early as possible preferably Within 3 months from today. All interim applications are also dismissed. No order as to costs. Sd/— TIP. Sharma i , Judge \"