IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9277 of 2010 JAGDEO PRASAD S/O LATE GHUTERAN MAHTO R/O VILL.- UGAWAN, P.S.- ASTHAWAN, DISTT.- NALANDA. …………… PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY FOOD & CONSUMER PROTECTION DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BIHAR STATE FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, PATNA 4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL BIRCHAND PATEL MARG, BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE PRESIDENT DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PATNA ………… RESPONDENTS ----------- FOR THE PETITIONER : MR.P.N.PATHAK, ADV. FOR THE STATE : MR.YASHWANT KUMAR CHAMAN, A/C TO S.C.25 FOR THE CORPORATION: MR.S.P.TRIPATHI, ADV. ----------- 2. 20/04/2011 Learned counsel for the respondents points out that the petitioner had earlier moved this Court through C.W.J.C.No.2881 of 2010 for a direction to the respondent authorities to count the services of the petitioner under Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation for the purpose of grant of benefits of A.C.P. The said writ application was disposed of on 27.8.2010, a copy of which has been produced before this Court for perusal. From the order, it appears that this Court found that the issue had already been settled by this Court in earlier judgments and therefore, the period of service rendered by the petitioner in the Corporation before his 2 deputation under the Government had to be computed for grant of A.C.P. benefits. Obviously, if the said period has been counted for grant of A.C.P. benefits, it has to be counted for all other benefits also including retirement benefits. In view of said order passed by this Court, petitioner has unnecessarily filed this writ application. In terms of the order passed in his earlier writ application, petitioner should not have any apprehension that the period of service rendered by him in the Corporation will not be counted for retrial benefits. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. Pradeep/ ( J. N. Singh,J.)