H!GH COURT OF CHHATT‘SGAR‘H ' RN ASFUR ‘WRW PETETION (T) NO. 4386 CF 2009 - Pancin Ram ‘r Versus ‘ - faxaiion ut‘norii'y cum LmAgMWW A gA mONER Ma’hamai James 42 yrs $Io Niaganla Oppaszte Bu $tand Mahendra fraveis v < ‘ I RES‘PamuENTs ‘ ‘ E Mis Kanke‘rE‘ Roadways, thro’ Pmp: Preetam Smgh Gamha, Near Gandh: Udyaan, CM? Lines, Raipur. Regiema! Tramport wiser, Raipur. I (Wiit pedt'mn under Artic¥e 226 of thé Constitutien of Endia} an Benc Hen bi m $ti gm J Sg e h e W ash K Ak‘om Present :a hr: Kala amra, counsel m e peoner. 3 Sh § th tm Sm? Amn sac, Govt Advocaie for the $tate. - ORDER (GRAL) {Passed cm this 1 7*“ day sf A: sgus: 2:309) Learned counse! apoeanng #or the nettsoner submit$ that the apphcatim dated 13 5 2009 (Arrexure - P/b) filed by the pehtlaner as pending coreiderailon befcre ‘he Remonai Tiansnort Authe:iv anti Taxation Awhonw, Ralpur and ever smce no actmn "iae been takee on the said apphcatzon 5hr: Sao burned Govt Advocate ansearmq far the State subwts that the eendmg apphuatior of the petitioner wouté be eensdered ane decided, in accordance with law and on Ks owh‘merits', withm a perwd of foui' weeks from the rdate of receipt 0f a copy 0f this order. In View of‘fgregoing, according to the Ieamed counsei appearing for the petitiener, nothing survhies in this petitian adjudicati/on. rngSy, th etiti is sp of‘ Accedi e wfxt pon dioseo k