ca6273.01 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6273 OF 2001 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION ST. NO. 19820 OF 2000 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | Mr. S.S. Kulkarni, adv for the applicant. Mr. S.G. Chapalgaonkar, adv for respdt 2. CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 13 th APRIL, 2011. 1 This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 30 days occurred in presenting the civil revision application. 2 Heard learned counsel for the parties. For the reasons stated in the application, application deserves to be allowed and the same is accordingly allowed. Delay of 30 days occurred in presenting the civil revision application stands condoned. Civil application stands disposed of. ( R.M. BORDE) JUDGE dyb ca6273.01 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.__________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGBAD. CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION ST. NO. 19820 OF 2000 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of | Coram, appearances, Court’s orders | Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar/s orders | and Registrar’s orders | CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 13 th APRIL, 2011. . Civil revision application is already dismissed against respondent no. 1 for want of prosecution in view of order passed by the Registrar on 16-10-2009. Respondent no. 1 is original owner of the vehicle and in the absence of owner of the vehicle, the grievance made in the petition cannot be adjudicated. Since no steps are taken for setting aside order of dismissal passed against respondent no. 1, civil revision application cannot be proceeded against remaining respondents. Civil revision application stands rejected. ( R.M. BORDE) JUDGE