u^^ \ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ^v0^o\ OF 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^ Deenanath Jaiswal Son of Late Shakhi Jaiswal, aged about 50 years, working as an Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Ramnagar, Block Kusmi, District Surguja (C.G.). VERSUS r 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through: The Secretary, Tribal Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 2. ''The Collector (Tribal Development), Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). c 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 4. The Block Education Officer, Kusmi, District Surguja (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^yr(y>^ ^^^ ;<'J^.--' ^y^>/ n^^--v/- >-yy HIGH .COLTRT OF CHHA1TISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION (S) No. 2061 of2011 Deenanath Jaiswal. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. 1. WRIT PETITION LrNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTrTLTION OF WDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Agnfliotri, J. Present: Shri V.K-Paudey. Advocate for the petitioner. Sliri Y.S.Tliakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents. ORDER(ORAL) (Passsd on 18th day ofApril, 2011) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instnictions, seeks permission to withdraw tliis petition with liberty to pursue his representation dated 23.09.2010 (Annexure P/3), pending before the respondent authorities. Leamed counsel appearing for other side has no objection. 3. It is ordered accordinslv. 4. Consequently, the v/rit petition is disinissed as withdrawn with the aforesated liberty, ifso advised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihoiri Judge 2. Amit