IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No. 19305 of 2009 Date of Decision: January 18, 2010 Smt. Ramrati and others …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. Vikrant Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana, for the respondents. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. The petitioners have approached this Court with the grievance that their reference application filed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) before the Land Acquisition Collector, Jhajjar-respondent No. 2 has not been forwarded to the reference Court of the learned District Judge. In response to the notice of motion, the District Revenue Officer-cum-Land Acquisition Collector, Jhajjar, has filed an affidavit. In the last para of the affidavit it has been stated that all the C.W.P. No. 19305 of 2009 31 reference applications belonging to village Dhandlan have been referred to the Court of learned District Judge, vide communication No. 1606, dated 6.1.2010. In view of the above, the prayer made by the petitioners in the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) January 18, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2