IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2008 / 8TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 21263 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------- KATHREENA CLEETUS, AGED 52 YEARS, W/O.CLEETUS, KADEPPARAMBIL HOUSE, PUTHENPALLI, VARAPUZHA P.O., VARAPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.A.X.VARGHESE SRI.A.V.JOJO RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, PARAVUR. 2. VILLAGE OFFICER, VARAPUZHA VILLAGE OFFICE, VARAPUZHA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. I.V. PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No. 21263 OF 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner is challenging Ext.P5 order in respect of disposal of an application submitted by the petitioner under the Transfer of Registry Rules. The petitioner earlier approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) No.2505/08 along with which she produced certain documents to show that the property in respect of her application is not the subject matter of A.S.No.220/2003. Taking into account the contentions of the petitioner, by Ext.P3 judgment, this Court directed the Additional Tahsildar to consider the matter afresh and pass appropriate orders, pursuant to which Ext.P5 order has been passed. In Ext.P5 order, it is stated that the petitioner has not produced any documents to show that the property in question is not one included in A.S.No.220/2003. 2. I am of opinion that when the petitioner filed a writ petition earlier producing certain documents, the Additional Tahsildar should have, at least considered the documents produced along with that writ petition. Therefore, I am satisfied W.P.(c)No.21263/08 2 that Ext.P5 order has been passed without taking into account the documents produced by the petitioner along with that writ petition. Therefore, Ext.P5 order is quashed. The 1st respondent is directed to reconsider the matter, after considering the documents produced by the petitioner along with W.P.(C) No.2505/08 and also other documents the petitioner may produce. The orders in this regard shall be passed after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of as above. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE Acd W.P.(c)No.21263/08 3