t^r\^>- (^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) N0. °>^[fc /2010 PBTITIONER ^CBt" '^<1 Ij^*1:.^^ ^ ^"^^ -^s^^ ^^ ^ RESPONDENTS ^*w^ ^^^\ i;:^ui(^»),| ^»-f^ Smt. Gracihda Nihala, W/o P.M. Nihala, aged about 69 years, Retired Assistant Teacher, Block Simga, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education officer, Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Simga, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury, Accounts and Pension, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. XI-HG—78 c^ WWTT^HT^ 7ST ^|<4id^, ytil-M^Ko, fsi<ni-<H<j,< ..|A3.£6')..^..:.3.^..(.^.^.^ WI, 200 wSw^Tf^rNF ^T^TT 3Tr^9T sft^i^ 1»--^' (.' r 3TT^T Tf5W (lic<?l<s<<^) 1^<TTW^f^3^T chl^fd^ TTm^f ^f 'fec3t Tf^T^R ^3tf?R37?^T §ip: Mion'bj'e snn rvianinara faioiian srinvastava, ^- 2S-07-2010 Shri Somkant Verrna, coun Shri Ajit Singh, Panei LsM^/ef for the State/respondents on advance copy. >el for the petitioner. Heard. Learned counsel appearingj for the petitioner subrnits that the petjtioner is entitied to benefit of two advahce increments on account of she having passed B.Ed. examination befor| submitted that the issue invoive^ integra and the sarne has been fir| in the case of Ashs Saxwm vs. 4 58. it is further submitted that thH order dated 06-02-2£X)8 passec| counsel for the petitioner further (| 29-04-2010 passed in WritAppea| judgment of the Supreme Cou?l ir1 order passed by this Court in aij have been issued for consjderati ? her appointment at her ovvn cost. It is in the present petition is no ionger re6- aiiy decided by the Hon'bie Supreme Court 'itate ofM.P. §.Ors. 200-3 (Sif) (SC) > Court has aiso taken a sirniiar view in his in W.P.(S)No.6257 of 2008. Learned iraws attention of thls Court to order dated No.124 of 2009, wherein reiying upon the the case of Asha Saxena (supra) and the lother Writ Appeai No.87/2009, directions on of the case for grant of rwo advance increments as per circuiar dated ^1-08-1874 issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, after verificatjon of the fa^ts pieaded in the petition. • fa^ts pi< Learned counsei for the petltioner wouid aiso be considere' respondents submits that case of the B on the saine iines. .^^ ^^T ^NI<n'M, ^•^l-Mjl<o, i®l<rll^< :HT< JTSS;WS^" r^^0 .'S%^/(-0 "•^ 200 ^n^l ^^ (1si^3^^) ^il^l^T^rf^ WTT ^^ s^^li^ |K»^IN11 I^RfTW ift^ ^T^T -Q,— in view of the statement mad^ -with a direction to the responuent auj of the petitioner for grant of two 21-09-1974 issued by the State of facts pieaded in the petition within a <^H[d^1'1 'RTR^f ^f ft^ '^I^R '^3fRma?n^T above, this petition is finaiiy uisposed of thorities to consider and decide the cialm a^vance increments as per circular dated g^ladhya Pradesh, after verification of the j3eriod of eight weeks frorn today. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^T^r^T E?NN~ ^IT^-T, <R^) <<nT^ —IS 147—2/2010— 1,00,000. k-