IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2011 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 1264 of 2011(G) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- DR.K.VIDYASAGARAN, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, FOREST MANAGEMENT & UTILIZATION, COLLEGE OF FORESTRY, K.A.U.POST, VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR, RESIDING AT KATTANY HOUSE, KANJANY P.O., THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.JAYACHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION COMMISSIONER, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, VELLANIKKARA, TRISSUR REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR, 680654. 3. THE REGISTRAR, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, VELLANIKKARA, TRISSUR 680654. 4. THE COMPTROLLER, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, POST, VELLANIKKARA, TRISSUR 680654. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.NISHA BOSE FOR 41 SHRI K.P.MUJEEB SC, FOR R2 TO R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.1264/2011-G ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as an Associate Professor in the Department of Forest Management and Utilisation, College of Forestry under the Kerala Agricultural University. The petitioner seeks for a declaration that in view of Clause 2 of Ext.P4 order the period from 01/01/1986 to 31/12/1987 for undergoing in-service training sponsored by the third respondent University, as qualifying service for career advancement promotion. 2. After the filing of the writ petition, the petitioner has filed I.A.No.2639/2011 wherein Exts.P7 and P8 have been produced. Ext.P7 is the further request which has not been considered so far, according to the petitioner. The petitioner, therefore, submitted Ext.P8 complaint before the Redressal Committee through proper channel. The learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that a direction may be W.P.(C). No.1264/2011 -:2:- issued to the Redressal Committee to take a decision after considering the merits of the claim. 3. In the light of the fact that the petitioner has already approached the Redressal Committee, this Court is not considering anything on the merits of the matter. Therefore, there will be a direction to the University to place Ext.P8 complaint before the Redressal Committee and the Committee will take appropriate decision in terms of the relevant orders and the U.G.C Scheme within a period of two months. The Redressal Committee will also give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE