WP(C) 3829/2007 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MADAN B. LOKUR HON’BLE MR JUSTICE U B SAHA Learned counsel for the petitioner says that steps have been taken to effect ser vice on Respondent No.5 just before the Puja break even though the order was pas sed on 14.9.2010. We find from the office report that no steps have been taken for effecting servi ce on Respondent No.5. In fact, no steps have been taken to serve Respondent No. 5 for the last three years. The petitioner is apparently not interested in pursuing the matter. Learned counsel for the Guwahati Metropolitan Development Authority (for short GMDA ) says that an order has been passed to demolish the unauthorized and illeg al constructions raised by Respondent No.5 over the plot of land. He says that a n appeal has been filed against the demolition order. That will be considered in due course. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for GMDA, we find that no thing further survives in this writ petition since the prayer is for demolition of the construction raised by Respondent No.5. The writ petition is dismissed.