81 l t0 1 INTHE HIGH OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CWPNo710 of2010 O8MI Dateofdecision G 2011 SunderLal and another etionet1sl Versus Stateof HaryanaS others CORAM HONBLEMRJUSTICEJASBIR SINGH MJUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG 1t R R 0 0 Present Mr P YadavAdvocate for the petitionet Ms PalikaMongaDAG Haryana 4 I Mi Kamal SehgalAdvocate RakeshKumar Garq J Z Fororders see CWP No166 of2010 Ll Ge 1 Z NGHI IRAKESH KUMAR GARGI JUOGE JUDGE a0 W2 e5 2011 Z ps m 1 6S1 Io e 1 Radhika 2014.05.08 10: 35 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 82 h IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND AT CHANDIGARH RA Noe5Oof2011in CWP No710 of2010 Date ofdecisionl 14032011 Sunder Lal and another Applicantsetitioners versus State ofHaryanaand others 0 e e e e eRespondents CORAM2 Honble MreJustice Jasbir Singh Honble MreJustice Rakesh Kumar Garg 0 Presentl MrP17Yadav Advocate for the 0 MtKamal SehgalAddl AG Haryana I Jasbir Singh J Orall 0 This order will dispose of RA No0 of 2011 and 85 of 2011 Z seeking review of a common order dated32011 For facilityof reference factsare beingtaken om RA NoO of201 1 This application has beenfiled with a prayer to review an order dated 3 2011 dismissing writ petitionflled by the The said Z wnt petltlonwas decided alongwith a bunch of cases Most of the writ CQ 1 petltlonswere disposed of by orderingthat wherever construction of the W2 1 Z petitionerson the acquired land has been admittedby the and recommendationswere made for rease of that land by the Land AcquisitionCollector qua them the acquisltionproceedings were ordered to be quashedsubjectto a condition that the land do not fall in the inastructure facilities such as widening of road greenbelt ROW global corridor and changeof zones etc This writ petitionand CWP N128 of 201 1 were dismissed by statingthat land owned by the petitioncrs 1S requiredfor green belt globalcorridor and facilities We 1 Radhika 2014.05.08 10: 35 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RA No0 of2011 in 2 CWP Noe8710of2010 r r rememberthat at the time of arguments1t was so statedby the for the In CWP No8710 of 2010 even replyhas not been flled however information was supplied to us at the time of arguments Now counsel for the by makingreference to thereplyfiled in the second case byMrNSMalik Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Goveent of Haryanahas stated that in reply lt lS not mentionedthat the land ownedby thepetitioners was required for green belt etc We have read the replyflled in which lt 1S clearlymentionedthat 0 earlieralso land fallingin khasraNo31112512 was madesubjectmatterof 0 the acquisitionhowever takingnote of the construction raised by the C5 13 marla of land was released from acquisition Z thereto vide theimpugned notiflcation in this writ petitiononly11 marlaof land was proposed for acquisitionIn replyflled it is very clearlystatedthat the land at the spot was lyingvacant and was recommendedfor releaseby L the Land AcquisitionCollector however it did not flnd favour with thehigh Z powercommitteeand was ordered to be acquiredIn reply it is further 1 C statedthat the area under constructionwas standing alone in isolation as Z such it was not possible to releasethe same Regarding the land which 1S m subjectmatter of acquisitionin CWP NoA28 of 201 1 it is stated that it is a partofthe green belt etc In view of facts mentioned above no case is made out for review Dismissed r Judge e 1400302011 Rakesh Kumar Gargl gk Judge Radhika 2014.05.08 10: 35 True Scanned Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document