SBCWP NO.7374/02. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7374/2002. Anand Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of order : February 09, 2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Ms. Anisha Jain for the petitioner. Shri Zakir Hussain, Additional Government Counsel. **** BY THE COURT :- The controversy raised in the present petition is that reservation beyond 50% cannot be provided to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in a particular year. 2) Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgment of Supreme Court in M.R. Balaji and others Vs. The State of Mysore and another {AIR 1963 SC 649}. 3) Controversy raised in this matter is squarely covered by two judgments of this Court in Smt.Sangeeta Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. {SBCWP No.2027/2002 decided on 6/2/2009} and Deepak Mathur SBCWP NO.7374/02. 2 Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. {SBCWP No.450/2002 decided on 29/1/2009} wherein, it was held that in view of The Constitution (Eighty-first Amendment) Act 2000 and sub-Article (4B) of Article 16 of the Constitution of India, the backlog vacancies would have to be treated as separate block for arriving at the ceiling of 50% in reservation. In view of above, I do not find any merit in this writ petition, which is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil SBCWP NO.7374/02. 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL MISC.STAY APPLICATION NO.6926/2002. IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7374/2002. Anand Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of order : February 09, 2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Ms. Anisha Jain for the applicant-petitioner. Shri Zakir Hussain, Additional Government Counsel. **** BY THE COURT :- Consequent upon dismissal of the writ petition, this stay application is rejected. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil