CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4012 OF 2009 :{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: SEPTEMBER 27, 2010 Sube Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Ashok Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. (ORAL) Mr.Rathee states that the present writ petition is rendered infructuous as the petitioner has been granted relief in terms of Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995. He has been treated into service till the date of his superannuation and thereafter would be entitled to pension and pensionary benefits as well. In this regard, reply by way of affidavit has also been placed before this Court, which is taken on record. The order to this effect passed on 22.9.2010 is also annexed as Annexure R-1 with the said reply. The CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4012 OF 2009 :{ 2 }: petitioner has been held entitled to draw salary upto the date of his superannuation i.e. till the age of 58 years and thereafter pension and pensionary benefits. Counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner would be entitled to serve upto 60 years. In case, the petitioner wants to make any grievance about the age of retirement, he may file a separate claim for that. The present petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. The petitioner would be at liberty to file any fresh petition, if some cause still survives. September 27, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE