S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 1299/2009 Subhash Chandra Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. Date of order : 20.02.2009 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mrs. Pramila Acharya, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that in pursuance of the information published in the local newspaper vide Annex.5, the petitioner submitted representation Annex.7 dated 17.11.2008 to the respondent No.3 Additional Director, (Administration) Medical and Health Services, Jaipur which has not yet been decided. In my view, there can be no reason for keeping the representation filed by the petitioner pending for such a long period and therefore, it would be appropriate to direct the respondent No.3 to consider and decide the representation filed by the petitioner Annex.7 dated 17.11.2008 strictly in accordance with law within a period of 15 days from the date of producing the certified copy of this order. With these directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp S.B.Civil Misc. Stay Petition No. 2367/09 In S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 1299/2009 Subhash Chandra Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. Date of order : 20.2.2009 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mrs. Pramila Acharya, for the petitioner. Since the writ petition itself has been disposed of, the stay petition also stands disposed of. (H.R.PANWAR), J. rp