XI-HC-78 WR^I 8WT<sb ^seT^rraRW, yifltf'is, Rldiyy . fti.^l^i 533 ^J^.......l^/........... ^. ^QQ 3TI^?T 'raSR' ('icli^°l<{,liT) sn^rqirf^Tr^ cPIT3IR?Tsti1iqi IAPPBLLAMTS gRiTWHfia'an^r IN THE HIOH COURT OF ^JUDICATURB AT BILASPUR (C.G.l CLAIMANTS RESPONDEWra: NON-APPLICANTS M.A.(C 1. 2. 3, 4. 1. 2. 3, q>i<iFCT<)1-< t<iidT^"te^)'<Rf«i{ ^sri^TSfi^r N0. 333/2006 Smt Ralii Bai, W/o Mohan Lal, Sinha, Aged about 42 yrs. MohaB. Lal Sinha, S/o Kisun Lal Sinha, aged about 50 yrs. Ku. Dbaueshwari, D/o Mohan Lal Suiha, aysd about 14 yrs. David Siaha, S/o Mohan. Lal Siaha, aged about 7 yrs, A^pellaat No. 3 & 4 are reprcsented by te^al guardian moftier Sint. Rahi Bai, Al} resident of ViUage Pacheda, Post, P.p. & Tahsfl Abhanpur, Distt. Raipur (C|G.) VttRSUS O. Nagarjun, S/o Kutuiab Rao, aged about 35 yrs, R/o M.S. Servlce Station, TeUbaudha, Raipur. P. Ramakrishna, S/o Surya Rao, R/o M.S. Service Station, TeUbaadha Raipur. The United India-Etin-u, Distt. Godawari (West) Andhra Pradesh, Pin Code-534002, Thiough Divisional Maa^er, XI-HC-78 s^r^iraRra', »Tnti'i6,fsfcfiuy *ii*i<'ii sbHrei ^ 200 3ii^l tia«n(v^l'yT) sn^rwf^iR; <raT3II^Tsbt< ?^IRKflf?(T3TI^r 'shi<<I<i<n-i ii*«flTfffe'<f)tRi'wH ^;3l)^IT3T1^T 4.4.2007 Divisional Office, Kachahari Chowk, Jafl Road, Ralpur (C.G.) cotinsel Shri S.C. Venna, Shri Dashrath 3/insurance coiupa^iy Guifrta, for the appeUaat. counsel for fhe respondeut No. Heard ou adnussk>4 The appeIIaD.ts/cIi agaiust the award dated| Motor Accident Claims I): conipensation as oaty awarded to fhe appeUaa^ Sinha, son of appeUauts No. 3 & 4, who died on 27|. inants have piieferred this appeal 21.8.2006 passed by 8th Additional ^nbiuial, Raipur for enhaacement of suni of Rs. 2,53,000/- has been ^s/claimants for the death of Oakar |No. 1 & 2 aud brother of appeUants 1.6.2005 in a inotor vehicle accident conipcn|sation Learacd couasel fl iastant appeal bas been| wlule coniputing wrongly appUed and sec) funeral expenses, loss o^ and loss of cslate, onfy awarded. The third appeUants is fhat the e^ wrongly beeu assesscd a^ be uaskilled labourer. wlt nionth by repairing the vejhicles \>r ttie appeUaats submits that fhe preferTcd flrstty on the ground that the inultiplier of 13 has been t>ndly, against various heads i.c. for love and affection, future prospccts sum of Rs.5,000/- each, has been sround raised bv counsel for fhe ^rnmg caparity of the deceased has Rs.80/- per day considering him to tereas he was eaming Rs.7,000/- pcr P.T.O. !![ ^aS23 XJ-HC-78 3i^?r%rteR? (RT snSsr giiiNi d-vf •*1WM^, WiS[w\6, Rldltl^ *11*<MI Sh*TT^i ^200 sn^riraqT (l^ig^T) ^nwHfersn^r I have heard leamed adtnlittecUv So far as inultiplier has held fhe same appeUants/claimants No. the deceased and are and thus, imiltipUer has bj - 2. As for ftie contentidn ought to Iiave becn ap] claiinants i.e. appellants f| of the deceased, fhe because the brother and the dependants on the pareuts when they arc unj abbve ^ainst various ofher hea4 of Section 163-A of fhe Mt been conuiiitted bv tU coinpensation to fhc appelp So far as caming cs ia. the absence of auv fhat thc deceased was t Tribunal has rightty asse^! as Rs.80/- per day beiag 'nilfCT'fl-l lllcl'l'fffW'tRlWK ^sri^irsn^r counsel for thc appeliants. <>f 13 is conceraed, learaed Tribunal considering the age of the 1 & 2 who are inother and father of .tn|ittedly 42 and 50 years icspectively ;en applied on thc basis of Schedide of (he appellants that aiiiltiplier ftied considering the agc of othcr |o. 3 & 4 who are sister aad brother contention caanot be accepted iister caa nevcr be construed to be d^ceased durfag the lifetime of their taiarried. The award of Rs. 5,000/- is ia accordance with Schedufc - 2 tor Vehicle Act and no fflegatily has leamed Tribuaal in. awarding aiits iu this regaid. :llaa ^pacity of the deceased is coacemed, ceb'tificate or documente which shows sanung Rs.7,000/- per nionth, the sed the daOv iacoxae of the deceased tBie coUectorate rate. l<^^t*l'!^f >--~ 3:5?T "i)l<<lci<4, aiTfl<Hi|(o, Iqoi^y t|l*1dl *N)cb V^ 200 3(1^1 'q'ra; (Tpfgg^si) sn^i.w R-ii* WIT SfKV *t|l<ti >4t'^n t^ITWdfel SII^I In the result, the appes|l deserves to be disnussed as tfa4 accoidia^y rlisinissed. ^)l<lll<n<tttT *41<1?ft "^f 'f^9r <FJi<$K iisiRman^i beiag dcvoid of substance admtesion stege itself and is Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge r