IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19219 of 2009 SOGARATH MANDAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 10.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that though there is allegation of pelting stone may be true but the act of administration was being protested as it was favouring one of the claimants. Petitioner and his villagers were claiming the only pathway connecting their village while their opponents were not allowing for the same. A title suit was filed for injunction, notice was issued, administrative officials were also made parties in that suit to defeat the purpose of the suit, only administration and petitioner’s opponent were adament to raise construction blocking pathway. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri at Sitamarhi in Bajpatti P.S.Case No. 89/2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Mandhata Singh,J.) A.I.