CWP No. 5036 of 2008. 29.07.2009 Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for the respondent. The disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner which culminated in office order dated 29th November, 1990. The penalty of dismissal from service was imposed upon the petitioner. Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, learned counsel for the petitioner has brought to the notice of the Court the judgment rendered by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrare Ist Class, Court No. 1, Rohru, District Shimla dated 28.6.1993, whereby on the same or similar charges, the petitioner has been acquitted. He has brought this judgment to the notice of Managing Director, H.P. State Civil Supplies, Corporation by making a representation. However, the fact of the matter is that the representation has not been decided by the employer in view of the judgment of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrarte, Rohru, dated 28.6.1993 till date. Accordingly, the respondent is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner after taking into account the judgment rendered in Criminal Case No. 62/2 of 1989, dated 28.6.1993 as well on the basis of : 2 : ratio of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in G.M. Tank Versus State of Gujarat and others (2006) 5 SCC 446 within a period of eight weeks from today. The representation shall be decided by a speaking and self contained order. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court if he is still aggrieved after the decision of the representation. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. July 29, 2009. Bhupender