^ HIGH COURT OP CHHATHSGARH AT BILABPUR SB : HON'BLBSHRI JUSTICB PRITINKER DIWAKER W,P. t22'n N0. 2203/2009 PBTITIOWER RESPONDBNTS Versus 1. 2. Kanker Roadways, Through the Managing Partaer, Preetam.Sm.gh Garcha,S/o, Late Jogeadar Sing, aged about 59 years, ^ R/o. Civil Lines, Raipur (CG) State of Chtoattfsgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Traasport, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (CO) State Traasport Auttiority, Bus Staad Paadri, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION CTtDBR ARTICUB 227 OP THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA Appesffaace: Shri F.S.Khare, counsel for the peti.tioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Qavt. Advocate for the State/respondentNo.l. . .*tee MW S. ORALORIiER \ (29^)4.3009} Grievance of tfae ^etttioner is that fhe State Traasport Authority has fix^:' the ^enda for 29.4.2009 and 30.04.2009 iawhich the heajring offhe applicati.on for gDant ofpermit ofdifferent persons is likely to be considered. Learaed couaset for fhe petitioner subinits that he had apglied.for grant ofpermit on 14.1.2009 forapardcular route but his application was defeired by the authonties by 1: ^'••'S:^^^^^ n (^ < statuig that on accouut of elections, fhe appUcation of fhe appUcant eauiiot be considered at present Contention of counsel for the petitioner is that ia soxae cases, the aufttorities have decided not to consider the applications aad iu soine cases fheaufhorities have faken decision to consider their cases in the ahcady fixcd agenda for 29.04.2009 to 30.04.2009 therefore, fhe action is uot ia accordance vrifh law and fhe agenda dated 29.04.2009 aad 30.04.2009 be quashed. The reUef as claiined by the petitioner is highly inisconceivcd, under Article 227 of tfae Constitution of India and such reUefcaauot be granted. In fhe result, the petition beiag devoid of substaace, is hereby, dismissed. __ Sd/- PiitinkerDiwakar 7 Judge .-^"1 .Aa