C^\\Wl IN THE HIGH COURT OF 3UDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION NOA<T?< OF 2006 / PETITIONER. : .c^^ ^"^{^ ^'^> .^\.-:-: ^•-^ y^^' ^y y>-" RESPONDENTS : -^-—""^.-... /'€—<. if*^^^' .^J> ^T^yi ^l?'^ l'-Ky?f^" Jugal Ram Sahu, aged 61 years and 4 months, son of Late Shri Shiv Dayal Sahu, working as Assistant Teacher, Government Primary School, Katghora (Basti), District Korba (Chhattisgarh) ..,»••" Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Collector, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. 3. The District Education Officer, Korba, Chhattisgarh. W^RITLPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 W^TWR-1 awsn^TsRtira y c Roshan/- ^iiHdrawf^ 3:3T '<ll-i|K'l<4, tSTny'ld, teffHy .^..^^l^. WT 3:(T^?riraq; (li?i^°i<w) s^cdwgf^rsn^r thfet 25.7^006 Mr. S.R.J. Jaiswal, Mr Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt) l-1eard. By the instant petition, th^ dated 6.7.2006 whereby he ha^ School, Katghora (Basti) to The grievance of the petiti!( of 8 months and at the fag end Govemment poiioy, whteh says within a period of one year shoufd| government employee is to befina|l Leamed oounsei for the petitioner may be altowed to mal^s turn, respondent No.2 be directed| which learned counsel for the Statt Having heard leamed facts and ciroumstances ofthe ca^ of the case, the petitioner is No.2 within ten days from today] respondent No,2 to decide the re|| 30 days from the date of receipt considering all the points raised of the impugned order dated 6.7.: shall remain stayed. With the direction aforesaicl Consequently, M.(W.)P. N^i Certified copy as per tulesf 'crafeifrT Hmcff ff tec^ • ^ad^Tsn^T Advocalje for the petitioner. Advooate for the State on advance copy. petitioner has questtoned his transfer order been transferred from Governmerrt Middle Goverrtment Girls Middle School, Pasan. ;tner is that he is goingto retire within a period <|if oareer he has been transferred against the nonnaily an employee who is going to retire |not be transferred, as the pension case ofthe lized. pe]titioner submttted that in the olroumstances the mal^e a representatton to respondent No.2 and in Ito decide the same in aceordance with law, to has no objection. for the parties and having regard to the ^e, withoutexpressing any oplnion on the merit altctwed to make a representation to respondent aiong with oopy of this petition and in tum, (iresentation of the petitioner within a period of |of representation in aocordance \Anth law after the petitioner, till then, the effect & operation (Annexure P-1) in respect of the petitioner toilnsel fctv 3006 , the petition stands disposed of. i.2876/06 also stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.