IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2008 / 21ST POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 29455 of 2007(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ SIVADASAN, AGED 82 YEARS, S/O. LAXMANAN, JAIHIND MANDIRAM, VILAYIL MOOLA, ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.RAJAN VELLOTH SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI.A.S.SABU RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADAKKAVOOR POLICE STATION, KADAKKAVOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADAKKAVOOR POLICE STATION, KADAKKAVOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. JAYARAM, S/O. SIVADASAN, JAIHIND MANDIRAM, NILAKKUMUKKU, VAKKOM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA G.P.SRI. SALIM P.A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT NO REPRESENTATION. DISMISSED. SD/= K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE. 11.1.2008. SD/= P.N. RAVINDRAN , JUDGE. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. cl K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & M.C.HARI RANI JJ. ----------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.29455 OF 2007 ----------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 27th DAY OF JUNE, 2008 J U D G M E N T Balakrishnan Nair, J. The petitioner, who is a freedom fighter and aged above 82, has approached this Court seeking protection against the 4th respondent, who is none other than his son. While admitting the writ petition, we passed the following interim order. “Admit. G.P. took notice for R1. Notice to respondents 2 to 4 by speed post. The 3rd respondent is directed to look into the complaint of the petitioner that his son, the 4th respondent is physically torturing him and if the allegation is found correct, render protection to the life of the petitioner”. 2. The 4th respondent has filed a counter affidavit in which it is submitted that he has no intention whatsoever to physically harm or harass the petitioner. W.P.(C)No.29455/07 -2- 3. We record the above submission of the 4th respondent. If the same is violated, the petitioner can bring it to the notice of the 3rd respondent. In that event, the 3rd respondent shall take appropriate action to protect the petitioner, as the occasion demands. The writ petition is disposed of as above. K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR,JUDGE. M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. dsn