IN THE HIGH CO0URT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION C.R.A. NO. 366 OF 2008 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.5622 OF 2008 Shri Madhukar Krishna Nail : Appellants v/s M/s. Nandi Cinema : Respondents A.V. Chatuphale for appellants A.G. Patki for respondent Coram : S.J. Vazifdar, J Date : 19.6.2008 P.C. The impugned order warrants no interference. Both the courts below have considered the evidence in its entirity and have appreciated the same satisfactorily. It is clear that the petitioner occupied the premises only as an incident of his employement. There is nothing on record which suggests that a right was created in his favour as a tenant. Thus upon the termination of his employment he was not entitled to occupy the suit premises. In these circumstances the C.R.A.is dismissed.