gCQ Smggg @nch IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR c9m¢ LW.P. (S) No. qwé.......m9) PETITIONER “/Grahan Das Manikpuri S/o. Natthu Das Manikpuri, aged‘ about — 43 year, R/O. - Madawa Block — Kasdol Distt. - Raipur (c.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENDS 1. ”/State ofchhattisgarh, Through : Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2i“ / The District Education Officer, Baloda Bazar, District — Raipur Kt C.G.> The Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat (Shiskha), Rw‘rgmf 3. 4. ’ The Block Education Officer Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF K CONSTITUTION OF INDIA + @ woa)ww/ m 2007 W 731mm (u) WWW ammm Wmm WW§§€1W éKaiWIm SB: HON’BEE SHRI JUSTICE PRIT [NKER DIWAKER 19.3.2009 hri Vineet Kumar Pandey, eqrunsei for the petitioner. Shri U.N.S.Deo, G.A. for the State‘ At the outset, counsel for th: petitioner wants to withdra this petition with liberty to file: representation against the impugned transfer order dated 6.3.2009 passed by respondent No.3. He however submits that irection may be issued for deciding the representation so mad in accordance with law. Contention of counsel for th State is that iet the petitioner make a representation and the is decided by the respondent No.3 in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is d' missed as Withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. 1n the ev ntuality of fiiing any such representation by the petitioner be ore the authorities concerned within a period of ten days from date of receipt of the copy of this order, the same is expected t be decided Within a period of three weeks from the date of its rec pt. / ri/l ., u Sdl- Pritinker Diwaker Judge w d s t