[^^..--^!^ ......,'j®^0'"... KU<W.^--'"' ^^^^w^'"' ^^:5^-1-" <^1 0-ZS^_^ HON'BLES.B. IN THE HON'BLE HIGHGOURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSV N0.^9 / 2010 PETITIONER: Ku. Sandhya Karma, D/o Late Shri Kosaram Karma, Aged about26 years, Caste MadiYa (S.T.), R/o Village Saothnar, Madkamiras para, Block Darbha, District Bastar, C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENTS: /l. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Building Ministry, Raipur, Chhattisgarh /I. The Collecfor, District Bastar, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh i J 3. The Block Education Officer, Tribal Welfare Department, Block Darbha, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTIGLE 226 Of THE CONSTrTUTION OFINDIA. Tha r.at-if-ir.nar e-iihmif-c f-hn nart-ii-i ilsrc nfthe. nol-if-inn ac iinHpr- - -HC-22 an^r^T !<;-ii!<i sn^i sti^icti ^Tft^ ^ TSI •^i<tlctq, riTn'y'ld. fawi+iy ^.u.t^.-Sz^ •f^^T" HMWI VtlW* 200 sn^i's^iiwafttT <*i^fd4i-< fwcif'9 feizt <r<i«i< ^; sipgq sn^l SB: Hon'ble SIui KEauiadra nl 03.03.2010 ohan Sfarivastava, J. Shri Alok Dewangaa, Shri Prasunii Bhaduri, cohinsel for fh.e petitioner. fanel Lawyer for the State. The grievance of fhe ]j fafher, she made au appli) appoiatineut upon attainin< petitioner she is enttUed to accordijug to fhe policy applic^ ;rievance is fhat representatic| been taken by the respondent] tfae .pplic^ble ktitiouer is that after deafh of her fcation for grant of coiauassionate age ofinajority. According to the ^raat of coinpassionate appoiatauent iu the case ofthe petitioner. Her having been inade, no decision has .cta lu fhe opiaion of fhis in directing fhe respondents petitiouer in respect of her a^[ appoiatment in. accordgunce wijfh petitioner. Petitioner, if so contmuation of eartier weeks from the date of recei^t upon receipt, tf any of such the same ia accordan.cc withl exceediag 3 inouths from the <P Cburt, ^Spvit, euds ofjustice would be seryed to take decision. ia fhe case of the jiplicatiou for grant of compassionate policy appUcable in fhe case of fhe 1, luay subinit representation in niade, wifhin a period of 4 of copy of this order. Respondents ifepresentation shaU talce decisioa on law within a reasouable period not ip.ate ofreceipt ofcopy ofthis order. adhdsed, repres^ntation 'XI-HC-22 ^-^ •^IFIRPT, ^ffffTC. faclKHy 3T[^?T IRra? K11CTI WW<=R 'WI. 200 feB^T' 311^1^)1 Sw'h sn^t ^^\^ ^rft? '»Ai Staha. '"It"is^"iuade clear fhat '^?': QpiaiQnTffiErinerits ofthe case. Petition is accordiugly f|iiaUy disposed of. qililin'iilt ^raai 4 fs^ <I«i«i< ^; SlPiTT 3D^T fhis Court has not expressed aay ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge