CWP No.604/2008. 25.4.2008 Present: Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Mr.R.M.Bisht, Dy.A.G. for the respondents. When this petition was taken up, Sh, Neeraj Kumar Sharma, stated that he does not press his claim for quashing the award. The main relief now claimed is that the respondents be restrained from taking possession or damaging the land which is not the subject matter of the award. This matter cannot be decided in writ proceedings and the appropriate remedy available to the petitioners is to approach the Civil Court for the redressal of their grievances. According to the petitioners about 20 bighas of their land which is the subject matter of acquisition is likely to be covered/damaged when the Hydro Electric Power Project is constructed. This is a disputed question of fact which cannot be decided in a writ petition. Evidence will have to be led to show if any of the damages and the quantum of the damage can also be proved only in the Civil Court. The petitioners should, therefore, approach the Civil Court for redressal of their grievances. The writ petition is rejected with liberty reserved to the petitioners to file a Civil Suit . Dasti Copy. ( Deepak Gupta) J. April 25, 2008 ( Rajiv Sharma ) J. GR