1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1217 OF 2005 (Ramkuwar Shikshan Sanstha & Ors. vs. Presiding Officer, School Tribunal & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JUNE 10, 2010. Shri Giripunje, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Thakare, learned counsel for respondent No.2. The parties to this petition i.e. petitioners – employer and Respondent No. 2 – employee have filed a compromise pursis jointly stating that all controversies between the parties are amicably settled and not only the impugned termination order but also subsequent termination order dated 16.12.2006 is also withdrawn by the management and Respondent No. 2 has been accordingly reinstated in service with continuity for the purpose of seniority. It is also stated that said respondent has given up all his claims for back wages and monetary benefits. The learned counsel state that the joint pursis is signed by the petitioner as also respondent No. 2 and then by their advocates. The counsel, therefore, jointly request for disposing of writ petition in terms of compromise. 2 I have gone through the compromise pursis. There is no burden on public exchequer. The compromise pursis is, therefore, accepted and writ petition is disposed of. Rule accordingly. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.