Crl. Misc. No. M-31099 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-31099 of 2011 Date of Decision : November 14, 2011 Beer Singh ... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Deepender Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Senior DAG, Haryana. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Accused Beer Singh has filed this petition for regular bail in case FIR No.106 dated 02.07.2011, under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Tigaon, District Faridabad. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. According to the prosecution version, petitioner was driving the motorcycle and petitioner's co-accused Vikram, who was on the pillion, Crl. Misc. No. M-31099 of 2011 2 fired shot at the complainant, who however escaped unhurt. There was also a third person Deepak on the motorcycle. Counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner is in custody since 25.07.2011 and the shot was not fired by the petitioner and that no injury was caused to the complainant in the occurrence. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Suresh Kumar, did not controvert the aforesaid factual position. However, it was submitted by learned State counsel that the petitioner is also owner of the aforesaid motorcycle. It was further submitted by learned State counsel that petitioner's co-accused Deepak has already been granted bail by Sessions Court. Keeping in view the aforesaid, but without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case, the instant bail petition is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Faridabad. November 14, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE