1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Criminal Application No.2257 of 2007 Mr.Anil Sadashiv Nanduskar Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.O.A.Siddiqui for applicant. Mr.D.P.Adsule, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. July 27, 2007. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel for the applicant whose application for discharge was rejected by the trial Court on 22/7/2005. . In addition to the belated challenge to the order dated 22/7/2005 raised in this application by the applicant i.e. after about two years, the applicant had also relied upon the order dated 3/12/2004 passed by the trial Court discharging co-accused Shri Pramod Sathe. The said order passed in favour of the co-accused was the subject matter of challenge before this Court in Criminal Revision Application No.441 of 2004 and when the said application was heard by this Court on 6/4/2005 it was noted down that on the basis of further investigation undertaken by the police under Section 2 173(8) of Cr.P.C. a supplementary charge-sheet was filed and in the same Shri Pramod Sathe was shown as an accused and, therefore, the discharge order dated 3/12/2004 did not survive. . It would be in the interest of the prosecution as well as the accused that the trial of the pending case is expedited and there is no ground made out to entertain this application at this belated stage. It is stated across the bar that on 3rd August 2007 the Sessions Case No.241 of 2003 is listed before the trial Court for framing of charges. . The application is rejected and the trial in Sessions Case No.241 of 2003 is hereby expedited. (B.H.MARL