FAO No.618 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.618 of 2011 Date of Decision : 04.08.2011 Rajesh Kumar .......Appellant Versus Neelam Kumari and others .......Respondents And FAO No.731 of 2011 Rajesh Kumar …Appellant Versus Ravinder Kaur …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. Jitender Dhanda, Advocate for the appellant. **** JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. (ORAL) Heard. The short argument raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is that he duly paid the insurance premium and a valid insurance policy was issued by the Insurance Company. However, there is no reference of the Insurance Policy in the impugned award. It was the specific stand of the Insurance Company that no such policy in favour of the appellant was ever issued. There is no evidence on record, on the basis of which it can be 1 FAO No.618 of 2011 said that the offending vehicle was insured. The learned Tribunal has rightly held that the driver and owner miserably failed to prove that the offending vehicle was insured. Thus, in the absence of the Insurance Policy, the responsibility has been rightly fastened upon the appellant. No other point has been argued. The present appeals being devoid of any merit, are hereby dismissed. ( JITENDRA CHAUHAN ) 04.08.2011 JUDGE atulsethi Note: Whether to be referred to reporter ? Yes/No 2