IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31074 of 2010 SHYAM SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 12.10.2010 Petitioner is languishing in custody since 19.05.2010 in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged against the petitioner to have caused fire arm injury on the left eye-brow of the brother of the informant and thereafter one Hareram Manjhi caused fire arm injuries on the back of head whereas Mukesh Jha caused fire arm injury on the hand of the victim. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that both sides are agnates and the petitioner is deprived of his share of property and for that reason petitioner has been implicated. It is further submitted that F.I.R. suggests that informant is not the eye witness as the post-mortem report reflects two injuries one on the eye-brow and the other on the occipital region, both injuries are communicating to each other whereas the prosecution side claims three injuries being caused to the victim. Considering the fact that the postmortem report reflects the injury on the eye-brow, alleged to be 2 caused by the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected at present in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 161 of 2009. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)