IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.466 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.466 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.466 OF 2008 Ashok Hansraj Sonkar ..Applicant versus State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mrs P.U.Badadar for the Applicant Mr. Saste for the Respondent CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 28th April, 2008. DATED : 28th April, 2008. DATED : 28th April, 2008. P.C. 1. The applicant is arrested in C.R.No.I-183 of 2005 and is charged under Section 328 and 379 r/w. Section 34 of I.P.C. After having perused the copy of the chargesheet which was tendered across the bar it is clear that five items of gold ornaments have been recovered from the applicant under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act. The applicant is chargesheeted with similar offences in some other cases. In my view, if the applicant is released on bail, there is every likelihood that he will not make himself available for trial. In such a case, the bail application is required to be rejected. At the same time, I am inclined to direct the Addl. Sessions Judge, before whom the -2- trial is pending to take up the matter as expeditiously as possible. Hence the order. ORDER . Application for bail is rejected. ii> The Ld. Addl. Sessions Judge, Thane, before whom the trial is pending is directed to take up the trial as expeditiously as possible. (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.) (R.Y.Ganoo, J.)