'^,. ^i^i^ A Writ Petition (Sl No. 1 S74 of 2008 Petitioner Respondents Smt. Jaya Naidu, W/o. Shri K.R. Naidu, aged about 53 years, Assistant Teaoher, Go\'t. Primari/ School, Netnagar, Biock EducaSion Office: Pusour, Distt: Raigarh (CG). Versus rf 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through She Secretary, School Educational Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Distriot Raipur (CG). 2) District Education Officer, District Raigarh (CG). 3) Block Education Offioer, Biook Pusour, District Raigarh (CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the. Constitution of India) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, ^. Shri Sanjay Patel, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate Tor the State. (Passed on 12-3-2008) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as iearned counsel appearing for the respondents/State Jointly submit that the facts and question of law, invoived in the present writ petition, are the same asto that of in Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. iWanicipai Corporation, Durg and another {20)6 (II) MPJR -C8 9Gi, v/hteh has been disposed of vide order dated 3-4-2006 and the order dated 7-2-2007 passed by this Court in Wr'it Petition (S) No. 697 of 2007 (A.N.V. Satyanarayan and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others). 2) Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bhardadwaj (supra) and A.N.V. Satyanarayan (supra), subject to verification of the fact asto whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed/D.Ed/B.T.I./M.Ed. Examinaiion Certlficate on her own expenses, as per the '%^-^ ^^'\ 1 "sa^ S %» K "V J ^tte--^^-' "•^^•^e£y t- cireuiare dated 13-9-1974, 24-12-1998, and 1-3-1999 and further whether she has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. Raiu SanshK.Ag"ibom Jud&e