1 criapln2331-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2331 OF 2011 1] Vikram Marotrao More 2] Gangadhar Vikramrao More 3] Parasram s/o Sakharam More 4] Rama Hanmanta More .. APPLICANTS Vs 1] The State of Maha. .. RESPONDENT ... Shri S.S.Rathi, Adv.for applicants. Shri S.G.Nandedkar,APP for R-State. ... CORAM : T.V.NALAWADE,J. DATE : 11/07/2011 ORAL ORDER: 1] This application is filed for anticipatory bail in Crime No.88/2011 registered in Purna police station, Dist.Parbhani for offences punishable U/ss. 394, 341, 323, 504 & 506 r.w. 34 of I.P.C. Papers of investigation are made available by A.P.P. Heard both sides. 2 criapln2331-11 2] Advocate for applicants submitted that he is not pressing application in respect of applicants 1 to 3 and he is pressing application in respect of applicant no.4 Rama More. Crime is registered on the basis of report given by one Rustum More who is sarpanch of village Aherwadi, Tq. Purna, Dist.Parbhani. He has made allegations against the applicants that on 15/5/11, when he went to the house of applicant no.1 who is police patil of the village to complain to him against his son, quarrel was picked up with him. Allegations are made that in the incident, applicant Gangadhar hit a stone on his head which hit on the orbit of his eye. Accused Parasram gave stick blow on his head and accused Rama gave kicks on private part. He has made allegations that applicant no.1 snatched gold chain worth Rs. 45000/- and also gave threat that he will implicate complainant in atrocity case. There are statements of the witnesses and there is injury certificate in respect of complainant. He has sustained contusion at orbital area and contusion over parietal area. The injuries were caused by hard and blunt object and they were within 6 hours. Report was given immediately. No injury is shown on any other part of the body and no allegation is made against applicant Rama. So this Court holds that relief can be given only to applicant no.4 Rama. Custodial interrogation of others is necessary and the application in respect of others is not pressed. So application in respect of applicant no.1 to 3 stands disposed of as not pressed. Application of applicant no.4 Rama is allowed. Ad-interim relief granted in his favour is 3 criapln2331-11 confirmed. These observations are only for the purpose of bail application and they shall not come in the way of trial Court while deciding the case. [T.V.NALAWADE,J.] umg/criapln2331-11