THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.22525 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is employed in the East Cost Railways, Visakhapatnam as a waiting room ayah. It is stated that she has been allotted a residential accommodation and on a request made by her, she was permitted to vacate it. The grievance of the petitioner is that though she is residing in a private accommodation, the respondents are not paying the house rent allowance. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The writ petition is not maintainable, in view of the bar contained under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunals Act. The petitioner has to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal to seek redressal. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. There shall be no order as to costs. __________ 09.09.2010 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.22525 of 2010 Date: 09.09.2010 JSU