IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 519 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.R.TRIPATHI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- PATEL GHANSHYAMKUMAR NARANBHAI Versus DISTRICT PRIMARY EDUCATION OFFICER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JOY MATHEW for Petitioner MS SEJAL K MANDAVIA for Respondent No. 1, 2, 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.R.TRIPATHI Date of decision: 22/03/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT : The grievance raised by the petitioner is that the petitioner was under suspension for the period mentioned in the petition, on the ground that a criminal prosecution is filed against him. Said prosecution has resulted in acquittal. The authorities are, therefore, required to pass an order as to the period spent on suspension, which is not yet passed. Hence the petition was required to be moved in this Court. It is stated on behalf of the respondent authorities that the authorities will pass appropriate orders regarding the period spent on suspension latest by 15.4.2000. 2. In view of the aforesaid statement, the petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. --//-- karim*