THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No.416 of 2010 DATED: 01.07.2010 Between: Ayub Khan .. Petitioner And The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 to 3 and the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4. It is the grievance of the petitioner that, at the instance of the 4th respondent, who is none other than his son-in-law, the 3rd respondent namely Sub Inspector of Police, Chilkalguda Police Station, is calling him to police station and forcing him to meet the demands of the 4th respondent for money, and in spite of his reporting the highhanded action of the 3rd respondent to respondents 1 and 2 herein, Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad, and Station House Officer of Chilkalguda Police Station respectively, no action is taken by them so far. Hence, he filed the present writ petition seeking appropriate relief. Respondent No.4 filed counter-affidavit denying the allegations made by the petitioner. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home produced the written instructions obtained by him from the 2nd respondent, wherein it is stated that the police, Chilkalguda, at no point of time called the petitioner to Police Station and asked him to pay the alleged amount to the 4th respondent. It is further stated that the respondent police did not interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 4th respondent. In view of the specific stand taken by the 2nd respondent, no further orders need be passed in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed, placing on record the written instructions of the 2nd respondent referred above. No order as to costs. __________________ JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA 1st July, 2010 IBL