WPMS No. 1732 of 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Piyush Garg, Advocate for the respondents. Having heard the learned counsel for the defendant/petitioners, the Court finds that it is not a fit case to interfere in the impugned orders passed by the court below. From a perusal of the impugned orders, one finds that the plaintiff has proved prima-facie his title and possession over the land in question. The court further finds that pursuant to the sale deed of 1989, the name of the plaintiff and the proforma respondents were recorded as tenure holder pursuant to which they have been put in possession and are enjoying the land in question since 1989. The court does not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order at this stage. The writ petition is dismissed. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 05.10.2010 Shiv