IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.^^OF 2009 SJNGL£ fiENGH PETITIONER •y T. Radhakrishnan, IAS S/o Sri C ^Thankappan, Aged about" 5St years, President, Board of Revenue Old Commissioner's Office, Bilaspur-495 001 residing at No. D-1/15, Devendranagar Officers' Colony, Raipur 492 001 (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS i.-:^"~. ^^€>^ ?i8^'"" ,^•'^0^° ^:^.^:' 1. Chhattisgarh Tourism Board, Through its Managing Director, Paryatan Bhawavn, Sibbal Palace, Indira Gandhi Marg, Raipur 492006 (Principal Respondent) 2. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Tourism & Culture, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur - 492001. (Proforma Resopondent) 3. Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Tourism Board Paryatan Bhawavn, Sibbal Palace, Indira Gandhi Marg, Raipur 492006 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS, AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR Wnt Petition fSl No. 6992 of2009 Petitioner T. Radhakrishnan Versus Respondents Chhattisgarh Tourism Board & ofhers WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon^)le Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) Shn Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate wifti Shri Harsh Waidhaa, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A. S, Kachwaha, Advocate for fhe respondents No. 1 & 3. Shri M, P. S. Bhatia^ Deputy Govt. Advocate for fhe respondent No.2. ORDBRfOrtdl (Passed on this 23rd day ofFebmary, 2010) 1. 2. 3. 4. Wifh the consent offhe parties fhe matter is heard fiaaUy. Learaed counsel appeadag for fhe respondents No,l aiMi 3 submits fhat the representation dated 2.9.2008 (Annexuxie P/16) and the appeal dated 11.5.2009 (Aanexure P/l^) would be considered by the coiapetent authorily, ia accordaace wifh law, on its own inerits aad appropriate orders may be passed withia a period ofthree weeks, In view of fhe above submissions uiade by leamed couxisel appearfag for fhe respondents No. 1 aiid 3, accordmg to leamed counsel appeanng for fhe petitioner, nofhiag survives ia tiiis petition for adjudication. In view of fhe forcgoiiig, this writ petition stands disposed o€ No orderasto costs, SatishK.Agmhotri Judge TfaaJcur