IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11629 of 2008 MD.SALIM, Son of Md. Khalil, resident of Zero Mile, Gulab Bagh, Lakahanjhari, P.S. Sadar, District Purnea ----- Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 7.11.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is an accused for an offence under sections 366A and 367 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Turkaulia P.S. Case No.276/04. The allegation against the petitioner is that in the alleged crime he used to help the other co-accused persons. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the statement under section 164 of the Cr.P.C., the informant did not allege anything against this petitioner. The learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that in such serious nature of crime in which the petitioner is alleged to have helped other co-accused persons, he is not entitled to the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and the circumstances of the case and the allegations made in the F.I.R., I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The application is, accordingly, dismissed. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)