alg’zazd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. S NO. h WM ‘ 55?? $mgia ganEE 2009 Smt JAHA ARA SHEKH W/o Shrl Shekh Menon aged about 4O years Upper Division Teacher, Madhyamik School Surpanguda, block Konta, District South Bastar Dantewara [C.G.) Versus Respondents : 1 . The State of Chhattisgarh, Through: — The Secretary, Chhattisgarh S. C. 85 S.T. Development Department, Mantralaya D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, South Bastar, Dantewara Dist. South Bastar, Dantewara (C.G.) The District Education Officer, South Bastar Dantewara, Dist. South Bastar Dantewara, (C.G.) The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Dantewara , Dist. South Bastar, Dantewara (C.G.) The Block Education Officer Konta, South Bastar, Dantewara Dist. South Bastar, Dantewara (C.G.) %/ Petitioner 02 @. The Chief Executive Officer Konta, Janpad Panchayat Konta, astar, Dantewara 6. Dist. SouthBM LE 226 OF THE WRIT PETYI‘ION UNDER ARTIC HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 5585 of2009 WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shl'i Satish K. Agnjhotri. J. Present: Shri Vijay Krishna Rao Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER ORAL (I’assed on 25 day of September, 2009) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage and as such, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition. He timber prays that the respondent authorities may be directed to Consider and decide his representation dated 04m June, 2009 (Annexure P/S) pending before the respondent No. 2, as early as possible. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that in the event, the representation, as stated above is pending consideration, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of four weeks form the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3. In View of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid observations. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotii ' x Judge PETITIONER Smt. Jaha Ara Shekh. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : The State ofChhaitisgarh & Others.