1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6394/2008 {Devi Singh Versus State of Rajasthan & Others} Date of Order :: 11th July, 2008 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Mr. M.M. Ranjan for the petitioner BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The plaintiff – petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction in respect of disputed property alongwith an application for temporary injunction to restrain the defendants from dispossessing the plaintiff during the pendency of the suit. The trial court vide its order dated 30th May, 2008 dismissed the application. Being aggrieved with the same, an appeal was preferred by the plaintiff which was also dismissed by first appellate court vide order dated 1st July, 2008. The aforesaid two orders have been challenged by the plaintiff in this writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that petitioner is in possession of the land in dispute, therefore, both the courts below committed an illegality 2 in not granting injunction in favour of the petitioner, therefore, both the orders be set- aside and injunction application filed by the petitioner be allowed. 3. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner in the light of the reasons assigned by both the courts below in the impugned orders and after considering the same, I find that both the courts below have recorded a concurrent finding in respect of prima-facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury against the plaintiff and in favour of the defendants. I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the said findings of both the courts below so as to interfere with the same. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. DK