1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3637 OF 2010 Sunil Jaysing Powar & Anr. .... Petitioners Vs. The Federal Bank Ltd. .... Respondents Mr. G. M. Savagave for the Petitioners. CORAM : A.S. OKA, J. DATE : MAY 6, 2010 P.C. : The Petitioners are Defendants in the money suit filed by the first Respondent Bank. Two orders dated 11th March, 2010 are challenged in this Petition. The first order is of rejection application of adjournment made by the Defendants. The second order is passed on application made by the Petitioners for de­ exhibiting the documents produced by the first Respondent Bank, which have been marked as Exhibits 79 and 80 respectively. 2 2. As far as the grievance regarding failure to grant an adjournment is concerned, the adjournment was sought on 11th March, 2010. The final arguments in the suit are not yet heard by the Court. Hence, it is not necessary to interfere with the said order. 3. As far as the second impugned order is concerned, even if documents are marked as Exhibits, the Court will have to consider the evidentiary value of the said documents at the time of final hearing of the suit. Whether the contents of the said documents are proved or not is a question which will have to be decided by the Trial Court at the time of final hearing. Apart from this the order exhibiting the documents can be always challenged in an Appeal which may be preferred by the Petitioners against the decree passed in the suit. No interference is called for. 4. The Writ Petition is rejected. [A.S. OKA, J.]