1 ra58.09 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 58 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5743 OF 2004 _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | orders or | Court's or Judge's Orders directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Shri S.B. Talekar, Advocate for the applicant. Shri M.K. Goyanka, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. ..... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Date : 28th July, 2011. . This Review Application has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 6th May, 2005 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 5743 of 2004. According to the applicant, the Division Bench has erred in not extending the benefits of the Government Resolution dated 15th June, 1995. Reliance is placed on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of "State of Maharashtra 2 ra58.09 and others V/s Sanjay K. Nimje" reported at "(2007) 14 S.C.C. 481". 2. We have perused the judgment of which the review is sought. The learned Judges have given reasons for not extending the benefits of the aforesaid G.R. to the applicant. We have also perused the judgment of the Supreme Court, where the Supreme Court in para 18 has observed that ordinarily a person, who has obtained an appointment in service on the basis of a false certificate, cannot retain the said benefits. 3. In our opinion, no case for review has been made out. The Review Application is rejected. ( M. T. JOSHI, J. ) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J) ga s/ra58.09