IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 256 OF 2006 SUMMONS NO. 256 OF 2006 SUMMONS NO. 256 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1769 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1769 OF 2006 PETITION NO. 1769 OF 2006 Shri Sai Nath Co-op. Housing ... Petitioners Society & ors. V/s. The Chief Executive Officer, SRA... Respondents and ors. And Jai Shivsai S.R.A. Co-op. Hsg. ... Applicants Soc. Ltd. Mr. J. Reis, i/b. Vyas & Balwal for the petitioner. Mr. G.D. Utangale for respondent No.1. Mr. Pradeep Jadhav, AGP for respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 7 Mr. S.G. Surana for respondent No. 4 Mr. Uday Bobde i/b. Mukesh Subramaniam for respondent No. 6. Mr. V.C. Kotwal, Sr. Counsel i/b. C.N. Gole for applicant in Ch. S. No. 256 of 2006. CORAM CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. V. MOHTA,JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 6th October, 2006 : 6th October, 2006 : 6th October, 2006 P.C. . Heard parties. Considering the affidavit, in our opinion presence of applicants are required for deciding the controversy in issue. In the light of that the Chamber Summons made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within one week from today. ( 2 ) 2. Stand over for one week. [F.I. [F.I. [F.I. REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] REBELLO, J.] [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]