MC 3592/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PK MUSAHARY Heard Mr. UK Nair, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. BD Konwar, learned counsel for the opposite party. The instant applicant is one for extension of time fixed by this Court vide its order dated 18.11.2011 to complete the fact finding inquiry as referred to there . A period of 30 days was granted, which incidentally expired on 17.12.2011. Citing various reasons, dilation whereof is considered inessential for the prese nt, the applicants have prayed for further 45 days time from 21.12.2011 to compl ete the inquiry. Noticeably, in paragraph 3 of the application an imputation has been levelled against the opposite party that he is extending threat to the wit nesses for which they are not willing to participate in the inquiry decided to b e conducted at Maligaon, Guwahati. Mr. Nair, while reiterating the averments made in the application, has insisted for the extension of time to complete the inquiry in the interest of justice. Mr. Konwar has assertively objected to the allegation of extension of threat by the opposite party and has submitted that it is clearly a ruse to protract the f act finding inquiry permitted by this Court. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on a consideration of the a verments made in the application supported by an affidavit, we, without offering any comment on the merit of the averments made, in the facts and circumstances of the case, grant a further fortnight time from today i.e. 21.12.2011 so as to enable the applicants to complete the inquiry as directed by the order dated 18. 11.2011 in WA No. 322/2011. It would be up to the applicants to take necessary s teps to ensure that the exercise, as ordered, is completed by the time allowed. Needless to say, the opposite party would co-operate with the process. No further time on this count would be granted. The miscellaneous application stands allowed.