(1) WP. 4718.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4718 OF 2010 Laxman S/o Devidas Uttarwar and others .. Petitioners VERSUS Daljitsingh S/o Dilipsingh Ramgadiya and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4719 OF 2010 Laxman S/o Devidas Uttarwar and others .. Petitioners VERSUS Daljitsingh S/o Dilipsingh Ramgadiya and others .. Respondents AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8229 OF 2010 IN W.P. 4719 OF 2010 Laxman Devidas Uttarwar and others .. Applicants VERSUS Daljitsingh Dilipsingh Ramgadiya and ors. .. Respondents Mr. R.R. Mantri, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent no.1 Mr. S.V. Kurundkar, AGP for the respondent-State ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 14TH JUNE, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1] Heard learned counsel. The Petitions are being disposed of at the stage of admission. The petitions are filed against rejection of application (2) WP. 4718.2010 for interim stay. The counsel for the parties make a statement that the appeals are scheduled for final hearing on 15.6.2010. The learned counsel for the petitioners make a statement that the petitioners will not ask for adjournments. In this view of the matter, since status quo is maintained till today, it would be appropriate to continue the status quo position for more 15 days with direction to the first appellate Court to decide the Appeal no. 17 of 2010 within a period of fortnight after concluding final hearing by taking up it day-die-dem. 2] The Petitions are accordingly disposed of by directing the first appellate Court to hear the main Appeal and decide the same within a period of fortnight from today without granting adjournments to the parties. If adjournments are granted, then to impose heavy costs of not less than Rs.10,000/- (Rs.Ten Thousand). The status quo to be continued for fortnight. All questions, including the question regarding maintainability of the Appeal and also regarding the identity of the property occupied by the shops which are allegedly claimed by the petitioners are kept open. The staus quo position as it exists today, to be continued. The status quo was maintained as per the statement made by the counsel. (3) WP. 4718.2010 3] Both the Writ Petitions stand disposed of. Civil Application no. 8229 of 2010 also stands disposed of. 4] Parties may act on an authenticated copy of this order, duly authenticated by the Court Sheristedar. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp