RSA No. 3014 of 2002 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No. 3014 of 2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.11. 2008 Abdul Hafij and others ...... Appellants Versus Smt. Fajri and others ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Amit Jain, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondents. *** Ajay Tewari, J. On the last date the matter had been adjourned to enable learned counsel for the appellants to ascertain whether the finding recorded by the trial Court that the ownership of the disputed property vested in the respondent was challenged by the appellants or not. Learned counsel for the appellants has not been able to show anything in this regard. That being so it has to be held that the finding regarding ownership of the disputed property being that of the respondent has become final inter parties. In these circumstances it has to be held that the judgment of the learned lower Appellate Court suffers from no infirmity since both, the RSA No. 3014 of 2002 2 ownership and the possession have been held to be vesting in the respondents. I consequently hold that the questions of law proposed in this appeal do not arise and dismiss the same. No costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE November 05, 2008 sunita