IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI WRIT PETITION NO : 19405 of 1995 Between: Manyam Bhaskara Rao @ Bulli Bapanna S/o Krishnamurthy r/o Vetapalem , Samalkot Mandal , W.G dist. ..... PETITIONER AND Revenue Divisional Officer and LAO Yeluru Reservoir Project Peddapuram , E.G District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to Issue an appropriate writ , order or direction particularly in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent in not making the reference to Civil Court U/s 18 of the Land Acquisition Act on the objections dt 8-1-95 filed by the petitioner to the order dt 31-12-94 as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondents to refer the objections dt 8-1-95 filed by the petitioner on the award in ref.D2/3902/93 dt 31-12-94 to civil court U/s 18 of L.A.Act and further direct the respondent to pay the balance of compensation payable even according to the award dt 31-12-94. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.V.RAMANA MURTHY ( Not present) Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter came up for hearing on 09-12-2004, none appeared, nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. Hence the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter is called, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ___________ 16-12-2004 rkk To 1. Revenue Divisional Officer and LAO Yeluru Reservoir Project Peddapuram , E.G District. 2. Two CCs to GP for Land Acquisition, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 3. Two CD copies.