WP(C) 1358/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Ms. D. Buragohain, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. BK Sharma, learned counsel, for the respondents No.1 to 4. None has appeared on behalf of the remaining respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is, in brief, thus: The petitioners were applicant for appointment to the post of Anganwadi Helpers in different centers under the Moirabari ICDS Project. The petitioners claim that the private respon dents, who have been selected as Anganwadi Workers and Helpers respectively, doe s not belong to the place, where the Anganwadi Center is located. As the dispute, raised by the petitioner, is substantially factual in na ture, this Court is of the view that in the facts and circumstances of the prese nt case, respondent No.2, namely, Director of Social Welfare, Government of Assa m, shall look into the grievances of the petitioners and make enquiry in this re gard and, in accordance with the findings of the inquiry, pass appropriate order (s). Whatever decision is reached, in this regard, by the respondent No.2 or wha tever order is, ultimately, passed by the respondent No.2, on the petitioner’s g rievances, shall be communicated, in writing, to the petitioner and if the petit ioner feels aggrieved by the decision(s), which may be reached, or the order(s), which may be passed by the respondent No.2, the petitioners shall remain at lib erty to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. The whole exercise, so directed, shall be completed within a period of t wo months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by the respondent No. 2. The petitioners may furnish to the respondent No.2 a certified copy of this o rder along with a copy of the writ petition and annexures thereto. Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel for the respondents.