IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 791 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- DILUBHAI JIVANSINH VALA ADVOCATE Versus SANJAYNANDAN SHARMA -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JITENDRA M PATEL for Petitioner NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 1 MR MA PATEL, APP. for Respondent No. 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 16/06/2000 ORAL JUDGEMENT The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that though, according to the petitioner, he had not expressed any apology before the Collector, the petitioner does not desire to press this petition in view of the fact that almost eight years have elapsed since the incident in question. The petition is therefore disposed of as not pressed without making any observations on the contentions raised in the petition. Rule is discharged. --- m.m.bhatt