HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No. 10456 of 2011 ORDER: Heard both sides. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that if the wage revision arrears are disbursed by the 1st respondent to the 2nd respondent, he would not be in a position to recover the amounts due to him as the 2nd respondent is not having any other amounts, except the wage revision arrears. Petitioner, therefore, prays to direct the 1st respondent to take appropriate decision on the representation of the petitioner. The petitioner is a senior citizen. He instituted execution proceedings for a direction not to release the wage arrears to the 2nd respondent by the 1st respondent and as the decree was not executed within two years, a notice was said to have been ordered by the Executing Court. In the meanwhile, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. The petitioner cannot be permitted to pursue two parallel remedies in respect of the very same relief. But, it is for the 1st respondent to take appropriate decision on the representation dated 1.4.2011 made by the petitioner. Hence, the 1st respondent is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 1.4.2011 in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the meantime, status- quo obtaining as on today shall be maintained till then. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ______________ K.C. BHANU,J DATE: 18th April, 2011 Note: Furnish c.c. by tomorrow. B/o pnb