IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1338 of 2009 Between: Yerra Narasimha Rao .... Petitioner/JDR No.1 AND 1. Thota Subba Rao (Died) 2. Thota Satheesh Kumar ...Respondent / Decree holder The court made the following: ORDER: This Revision is filed against the order of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Sathupally in E.P.No.62 of 2004 in O.S.No.21 of 1996 which was filed for the arrest of the present Petitioner /Judgment Debtor No.1. The learned Junior Civil Judge, Sathupally, holding that admittedly the present petitioner is an employee and he has means to discharge the debt, dismissed the plea of the present petitioner that he has no income. As contended by the learned counsel for the respondent / decree holder in the counter filed in E.P.No.62 of 2004, the Judgment Debtor himself stated that he is a small employee and he is maintaining his family, hardly, with his salary. Thus, admittedly, he is an employee. As such, it cannot be said that he has no means to discharge the debt. Out of the decretal amount, Rs.15,000/- was already deposited in pursuance of the interim order passed by this Court, which the respondent / decree holder is permitted to withdraw. The remaining amount would be only Rs.13,000/- and odd, apart from the interest, if any, payable. In the circumstances, particularly, in view of the admitted fact that, the petitioner being an employee, his contention that he has no means, cannot be accepted. Considering the fact that the amount involved is only a paltry one, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. ________________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY. J 20th August, 2009 yvl/rns