IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6637 of 2004 Vishwanath Sharma, son of Late Shyam Narain Singh, resident of Village Nadwan, P.S. Dhanarua, Distt. Patna …Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Secretary cum Commissioner, Industry Department, Govt. of Bihar, New secretariat, Patna 2. The Industrial Development Secretary cum Commissioner, Industry Department Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna 3. The Bihar State Khadi and Village Industries Board through its Chairman, Khadi Bhawan, East of Gandhi Maidan, Patna 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Bihar State Khadi and Village Industries Board Khadi Bhawan, East of Gandhi Maidan, Patna …Respondents ----------- 07. 23.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. Petitioner filed the present writ petition raising a grievance that he has not been paid the benefit of second time- bound promotion. It is also the grievance that on grant of second time-bound promotion he would also be entitled to payment of difference of arrears of pay from the date of grant of such time-bound promotion. Mr. Atul Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is entitled for such time-bound promotion with effect from 1988. Learned counsel for the Respondent-Board, on the other hand, contends that the grievance of the petitioner was looked into by the Respondent-Board and he was found entitled to and was granted such time-bound promotion with effect from 2 16.02.1995. It is further contended that the authorities thereafter calculated the amount payable to the petitioner on account of grant of such time-bound promotion and on computation thereof a sum of Rs. 17,954/- was found due and admissible and, as such, a cheque bearing no. 754936 dated 13.09.2011 drawn on Punjab National Bank favouring the petitioner has already been issued. Learned counsel for the respondents produced the aforesaid cheque along with sanction letter bearing memo no.422 dated 13.09.2011 which have been handed over to Mr. Atul Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner in Court. On hearing the parties and going through materials on record, this Court is satisfied that the grievance of the petitioner has substantially been redressed. For remaining grievance(s), if any, this Court permits the petitioner to make appropriate representation before the Respondent-Board along with a copy of the present order which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law as quickly as possible preferably within 12 weeks of its presentation. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )