we» Shri Gopal séo, VAged about 53 years, R/b' Eillage-Ratanpur, Tahs1l Kata, Dlstrlct Bllaspur, (C 6.). P R NO, w.%§~ iw-vn .mauguo ”wad by 5h“ “a eyémRszm ‘tg/ - Pr b \v -- contd. < <1, \;}‘ 3 d aswui ‘ .2 /2/ Qf EglT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION Qi: INDEA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE V£IT IN THE NATURE OF VgyIIIqDAIggus/cERIIOR/ARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/,QRDER IN THE IIKE NAIUIIE Elc. :32 H§GfH CGURT OF CHHATT13GARH AT BiLiiSPUR WRIT PETiTaON N0. 26.76 @F 2W2 Petitianer Zéia $ahakari Kemdriya 8am Mafyadé‘i, Baasrgur. Versus ‘ aondems The Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies & Others. WRIT PETlTiON UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUTSON OF §NDIA QSB : Hon’bie Mr. Satish K. Agriihotri, J.) ent :- ‘Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate forthe petitianer. Nene for the respondents. . OR§ER {Omi‘g (Passed on 4‘“ day of Ociober’, 201 O) 1. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 2?.092002, passed by the Registrar; Cooperative Secieties, in eppeat case No.78-22/2002 (Annexure P—t); fiied against the order dated i7t4t2002 passed by the Deputy Regietrar, Cooperative Societies, granting stay of recovery of an amount of Rs. 1000/- from the saiery of respondent No.3 (Annexure P-7). Thereagainst, an appeal was fiied by the petitioner befpre the Registrar, Ccoperatiye» Societies. The Registrar. Coeperative Societies, having oensidered aii the facts of the case, came ta the oonciusion that baiance of convenience was in favour of the respondent No.3 and the order dated 17.4.2062 (Annexure PJ) was just and proper. Thus; the appeat was dismissed. 2. The instant petition ts fiied Chatienging the Vaiidity of the order dated 2?.92Q02. On considering the submission made by the teamed counsel tor the petitioner and on perusai of the documents, l do not find any irreguiarity in the order dated 17.4.2002 passed by the Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, and thereafter, order Ras Pres [\L‘‘ dated 27.9.2002 passed by the Registrar; Caoperative Sacieties, affirming order of the Deputy Registrar” ‘t appears that the matter has been pending canSideration before the Deputy Registrar; Cooperative Societies, since 2001 and final order must have been passed by this time. Even otherwise, since no order has been passed after the order dated 219.2962 by way of inierim rerief, by this Court, at this juncture, it is not neceesary to examine afresh and pass any order interfering with the impugned order dated 27.9.2092 in exeroiee of its iurisdiction under Articie 225/227 of the Constitution of indie, Even otherwise, the instant petition is against the order passed by the Registrar, affirming the order granted by the Deputy Registrar. Thus, there is no merit in this case; the petition is dismissed" No order asto costs. ,Sd,_ f Satish K. Agnihotri Judge