IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3419 of 2010 Nasimuddin s/o late Najmuddin, village – Pipla, P.s. – Masaurhi, District - Patna Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. The Secretary, Rural Development Agency, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Director, District Rural Development Agency, 4. The Secretary cum Commissioner, Food, Supply and Commerce Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 5. The Additional Secretary, Food, Supply and Commerce Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 6. The Divisional Commissioner, Patna Range, 7. The District Officer, Patna 8. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Masaurhi, Patna 9. The Block Supply Officer, Masaurhi, Patna ----------- 4 12/4/2010 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, learned counsel for the State. It is submitted by learned counsel for the State that the grievance that has been agitated by the petitioner as pro bono publico has already been redressed inasmuch as the mistake committed by the District Rural Development Agency, Patna, by which around 400 beneficiaries of Berra Gram Panchayat were shown in the list of Bara Gram Panchayat, has been rectified and the said number of persons have been 2 brought in the Gram Panchayat of Berra. In view of aforesaid, we are disposed to think that the public interest, which was sought to be canvassed, has already been achieved and the grievance has been remedied . In view of aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. Neyaz/ (Dipak Misra, CJ.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)