CRM No. M 36993 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 36993 of 2010 Date of decision: 13.05.2011 Nihal Singh ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Manoj Makkar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana for the respondent - State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of order dated 17.11.2010 (P1) passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jind, whereby, the application for exemption for just one date has been rejected and the bail bonds furnished by the petitioner have been forfeited and non bailable warrants have been issued in complaint case No. 642-2 dated 01/10/2008 under Section 3 of the Railway Properties Unlawful Possession Act, 1966. Learned counsel for the petitioner contend that the petitioner was regularly appearing before the trial Court. Thereafter, he moved an CRM No. M 36993 of 2010 2 application on 17.11.2010 for exemption of personal appearance for one date only. However, the said application was dismissed and bail bonds were cancelled. It is contended that the petitioner is a resident of Agra and posted at Jind. It is also contended that the petitioner is only working at Jind and nobody knows him at Jind, so his earlier bail bonds be restored. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the present petition is allowed and order dated 17.11.2010 (P1) passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jind is set aside subject to appearance of the petitioner before the Court on the next date of hearing. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 13.05.2011 mohan