IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 15871 of 2008 Between: 1 Nemani Rama Rao S/o. Pathabhiramaiah R/o.D.No.23-15-1/7, Sriram Nagar, Rajahmundry, E.G. District. 2 D. Appa Rao S/o. Late Appanna R/o.D.No.23-15-1/4, Sriram Nagar, Rajahmundry, E.G. District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Municipal Corporation of Rajahmundry, East Godavari District rep. by its Commissioner. 2 The Town Planning Officer, Municipal Corporation of Rajahmundry, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 3 The District Manager, A.P. State Housing Corporation, East Godavari District at Kakinada. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents to take up the construction of Vambay Houses on 40 feet road margin situated in T.S.Nos. 34 and 812 in Ward No.42 of Sriram Nagar, Rajahmundry as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents not to proceed with construction of Vambay Houses on the road margin by considering the representation of the petitioners dt. 30.05.2008 in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.VISHNU VARDHAN REDDY The Court made the following : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18901 of 2008 Between: K. Perumal Muniratnam S/o. Perumal Chetty R/o. Subhash Nagar , Back Side of Marketyard Rajahmundry, East Godavari District, Rep. by his G.P.A.Holder K.V. Ravi Kumar ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Municipal Corporation of Rajahmundry East Godavari District, Rep. by its Commissioner, 2 The Town Planning Officer, Rajahmundry Municipal Corporation, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 3 The District Manager, A.P. State Housing Corporation, East Godavari District at Kakinada. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents to take up the Construction of Vambay houses on the 40 feet Road margin situated in T.S.Nos. 34 and 812 in Ward No. 42 of Sriram Nagar, Rajahmundry as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents not to Proceed with constriction of Vambay Houses on the road margin by considering the representation of the petitioners dt. 30-5-2008 in the interest of justice and to pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.K.MOHAN RAMI REDDY The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 15871 OF 2008 AND WRIT PETITION NO. 18901 OF 2008 COMMON ORDER: 1. These two writ petitions are ﬁled assailing the action of the Municipal Corporation of Rajahmundry, East Godavari, the Town Planning Oﬃcer, Rajamundry and the District Manager, A.P. State Housing Corporation, East Godavari- Respondents No.1 to 3 in not considering their representations dated 30-5- 2008. Since the representation is submitted by the writ petitioners together, both the writ petitions are heard together. 2. When the writ petition came up for admission, Sri A.Vishnu Vardhan Reddy, learned standing counsel received notice on behalf of Respondents NO.1 and 2 and Sri K. Mohan Rao, learned standing counsel received notice on behalf of Respondent No.3. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that their limited grievance is non-consideration of their representation submitted by them to the Respondents NO.1 to 3. 5. In that view of the matter, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider their representations with regard to the objections raised by them as to construction of Vambay Houses on the road margin and pass appropriate orders within four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No order as to costs. _____________________________ Justice B.Seshasayana Reddy 2nd September, 2008 KM THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 15871 OF 2008 AND WRIT PETITION NO. 18901 OF 2008 2nd September, 2008.