IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9176 of 2011 Prakash Yadav @ Ram Prakash Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 05/ 08.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. It would appear from perusal of the first information report that the petitioner along with two other FIR named accused persons assaulted the deceased and at the time of the aforesaid occurrence, the petitioner was armed with Tangi. The post mortem report of the deceased reveals that the deceased had received five incised injuries on his person. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there was enmity between the parties and, as a matter of fact, in the year 2001, the petitioner had lodged Magadh Medical P.S. Case no. 22/2001 against the deceased and others and that is the reason of his false implication in the present case. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Magadh Medical P.S. Case no. 88 of 2008 stands rejected. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)