cg ma; @ ' WhBench é; IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATrISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (S) No. K57? OF 2009 /. PETITIONER Santram Sahu, S/o Late Shri Ramji Sahu, aged about 49 years, R/o Village & Post Jijamgaon, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS / -1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, Schooi Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Director Pubiic Instruction, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, Education District Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 4. District Education Officer, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QE , u INDIA 3a w mama, W mtg mm "$120M Chaiierlgs in thc pr sent petition is {o the 0rd€r dated 30.06.200§ (Annexum P] ) passed by the respondent No.1 by which the petiu‘oner who i Working as Upper Division Teacher has been transferred f n Gevt. Middle Scheol Mahamli, Magarlod, Distt. Dha to Block Dharsiwa at the optioix of ipur. Lemed counsel foe the petitioner submits that in his t present place of posfmig he has joined in the month of September 2008 and with§iii less than one year, he has been transfexred agam He further submits that The seniority of the Upper Division Teacher ‘is being 'maintained' district Wise Whereas he has been trailsferreti from one district to aiiothee district aed thus his seniority would be adversely affected. i 1 ’ a , . m “ Distm'ct Educaticn. Officer, » b Comsel for the State submits that iet the petitioner make a representation to the resyontient No. 1— and the same wouk}. be decideé iii aeeotrianee with law. / WW>mv.ra/,«we-.w WW, . , w i ammm m“gf§“m ammm ‘ DEWAKER $§ z E‘H‘J3PELE $3R§ $3$T”CE ?&ETENKER DEWAKER i?.{}'?.2§69 ' Shri P.P.Sah11, cotmwl for th€ paiiimmr. Shn' Sumesh Bajaj, 2A. for tha Stats. n , u XI-HC—78 31.% 3* Em? w mam W J $a€fmam Counsel for the ,r » rapresantation. However h€ .H, petitionsr agmes i0 make a submits that 1:331 ibis representation is décided; fhe petitionar m4 Accordingly, €116 petit the petitionar to make a' r‘ days; $ff6ffi‘;‘t§ie $ date of rscei} would be decid€d withm a of its rscaipt. Tm then tha affect to. ;a.y be given some protective order. ion is disposed of with a direction to :preserifatioa within a pen‘od of ten )t of the copy offhis cider, the. same peiiod of three weeks from the date impugned order shal'i not be given Sd/- J" l «e' '~ w.m i , ‘ , Pritinker Diwaker Judge xyssWMe , , ., e In