IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 6543 of 2008. Decided on: 23.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ B.S. Mehta. … Petitioner. Versus Dr. Y.S. Parmar University and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. For the petitioner : Mr. Sunil Chaudhary, Advocate vice Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C. J. (Oral): This writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- “A) That the respondents may kindly be directed to fix the pay of the applicant proportionally over and above the scale of the respondent No.2 or alternatively at par with the respondent No.2. B) That the respondents be directed to pay all the consequential benefits to the applicant.” 2. It is stated in the reply that the benefits granted to the second respondent have already been withdrawn. Yet the petitioner’s grievance is that he is entitled to the benefits on account of his meritorious service. - 2 - 3. It is a matter for the petitioner to approach the first respondent and in that event, the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent-University within a period of four months after the receipt of representation alongwith a certified copy of this judgment. 4. With the above observations, the petition is closed, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 23, 2010. (sck/awasthi).