CLCON 56/2008 Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. Heard Sri S.K. Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.P. Shah, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. By way of this contempt petition, the petitioner has sought the relief to issue notices against the respondents and to punish them for their willful disobedience of the order dated 13-3-2008 passed by this Court in Second Appeal No. 20 of 2008, Ashok Kumar Sharma Vs. Sate and another. From perusal of impugned order dated 13-3- 2008, it reveals that this Court has passed the interim order in the second appeal to maintain the status quo in respect of the suit property. Counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents and it has been averred therein that a passage of about 5 meter in width has been kept open which leads to the property of the petitioner. This fact is supported by the photographs annexed with the counter affidavit. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find this matter for committing the contempt of court’s order. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed. The notices issued against the respondents, are hereby discharged. Dated: 22-4-2009 (B.C. Kandpal, J.) ISB