IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39742 of 2009 MD.SALAUDDIN KHAN & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 04.05.2010 In view of the specific allegation and the nature of allegation as levelled in the complaint petition relating to offences under Section 498(A), 323 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code under the complaint petition, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners was earlier rejected by this court’s vide order dated 08.05.2008 under Cr. Misc. No. 46893 of 2007 (Annexure-1). This is the second attempt for anticipatory bail. It is submitted by the petitioners’ counsel that the parties have come to a compromise and such petition vide Annexure-4 has been filed. It is not known whether the complainant has been examined in Court in support of the compromise or not. In the facts and circumstances, I do not feel inclined to reconsider the prayer for anticipatory bail. Therefore, prayer is refused. However, if so advised, the petitioners may surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail which will be disposed of by the court below without being prejudiced by the order passed in this order. (C.M. Prasad, J.) Ravi/-