IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.5900 of 2006 Date of Decision: May 11, 2011 Shashi Bhushan Sharma .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. R.N. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Saini, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondents. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner, Shashi Bhushan Sharma, filed the petition in regard to higher fixation of pay. Petitioner died during the pendency of the petition. Respondents have allowed pensionary benefits to wife of the petitioner, at enhanced pay, and therefore, cause of action does not survive. 2. The petition is disposed of as infructuous on the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner. (AJAI LAMBA) CWP No. of 2011 [2] May 11, 2011 JUDGE avin