THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.679 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner claims to have purchased an extent of Ac.0.07 ½ cents of land in Survey Nos.706/4 and 706/5 of Chinnachowk Village, Kadapa Mandal and District on 22.12.2001. Respondent Nos.4 to 6 were assigned about Ac.0.03 cents each in Survey No. 707 in the year 1999 by the Tahsildar, Kadapa Mandal and District. When the petitioner faced some boundary dispute with respondent Nos.4 to 6, he submitted an application before the Tahsildar, Kadapa Mandal and District, respondent No.3 herein, under the Right to Information Act, 2005, to know about the nature of assignment in favour of respondent Nos.4 to 6. Respondent No.3 made an endorsement, dated 22.06.2009, stating that the land in Survey No.707, admeasuring Ac.0.53 cents is classified as ‘rastha poramboke’ and that, no lay out was prepared for it. He expresses his inability to verify the boundaries of the land assigned to respondent Nos. 4 to 6 through D-Form pattas. He further stated that the relevant records are not available with his office. On receiving this information, the petitioner approached the District Collector, Kadapa, respondent No.1 herein, to initiate action against respondent Nos.4 to 6 alleging that they have played fraud. An endorsement was made to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kadapa, respondent No.2 herein, to take action. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.2 did not take any steps so far. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. The petitioner has assumed to himself several facts vis-à- vis the assignments made in favour of respondent Nos.4 to 6. No where in his reply, respondent No.3 has stated that the pattas issued in favour of respondent Nos.4 to 6 are fabricated or bogus. Further, in case the petitioner feels aggrieved by the pattas, he has to avail the remedy of appeal before the forum concerned, duly indicating the basis therefor and seeking condonation of delay. Though respondent No.1 made an endorsement to respondent No.2, that hardly constitutes any basis for interference with the D-Form pattas issued to respondent Nos.4 to 6. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the remedies under the relevant provisions of law to assail the D-Form pattas in favour of respondent Nos.4 to 6, duly impleading them. As and when such proceedings are initiated, the authority concerned shall deal with the matter on its own merits. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:22.01.2010 kdl