IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2972 of 2009 AJAY KUMAR MISHRA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 3. 13.01.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State as also the learned Counsel for the Bihar Public Service Commission. I.A. No. 199 of 2010 has been filed for addition of 29 persons as petitioners to the writ petition claiming similar relief. This Court considers it appropriate to allow the application after hearing the Counsel for the State also as otherwise it shall only result in 29 further writ applications before this Court on an issue already decided by this Court. The persons named therein are deemed to be in the original writ application. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order dated 29.1.2008 itself supports and identifies his claim to be declared regular appointee in contradistinction to his contractual status holding that it requires an independent decision. He now urges that a similar matter has been decided by this Court in CWJC No. 128 of 2008 and therefore in light of the observations in the impugned order dated 29.1.2008 his case may be considered to that extent in accordance with the order of this Court referred to above. Learned Counsel for the State submits that it shall remain a matter for factual verification if the petitioner was similarly situated on facts as those considered in CWJC No. 128/2008 as only in that event he may be entitled to be accorded similar treatment. Let the case of the petitioner be considered in accordance with the decision in CWJC No. 128/2008. If the respondents propose to hold that he is not covered by the same they shall be required to furnish reason to the petitioner why he is not covered by the order of this Court in CWJC No. 128/2008 and after considering the cause if any shown by him pass a reasoned and speaking order identifying the issues of facts which distinguishes him from those considered in CWJC No. 128/2008 by a reasoned order. Let the same be done within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed off. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)