1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5389 OF 2010 (Sunil Rajendrao Onkar vs. Vasant Sahakari Ginning Pressing Society Ltd. & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. NOVEMBER 24, 2010. Heard Shri Kharkate, learned counsel for the petitioner. The Industrial Court has recorded a finding of fact that the petitioner was not working as Ginning Supervisor. The learned counsel has contended that apart from oral evidence of the petitioner, one Shankar was examined to show the said working. Though in his examination-in-chief, he has accepted his signatures on document No. 3, 6, 7, 8 and 9 but then has stated that contents of those documents were incorrect. He has accepted that when he was working as Manager, the petitioner was paid as Peon and Watchman. He has retired from employment on 15.08.2006. The Industrial Court has found that the petitioner has relied upon resolution dated 30.06.2006 but then that resolution did not appoint the petitioner on the post of Ginning Supervisor. The joining report also did not show that post. The findings recorded by the Industrial Court 2 are based upon the appreciation of evidence. There is not perversity or jurisdictional error. Writ Petition is, therefore, rejected. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.