IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 20TH AUGUST 2010 / 29TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 26714 of 2010(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. B.VINEETHA , D/O. P.MADHAVAN AGED 55 YEARS, SUHAS, KAMUKINKODE KODUNGAVILA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. S.SHYLAKUMARI, D/O.R.VELAYUDHAN PILLAI AGED 55 YEARS, 'MADHAVAM' ANDOORKONAM PO POTHANKODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 3. UMA B NAIR, D/O.C.N.BALAN NAIR AGED 55 YEARS, TC 24/459/6 JAYASREE P.R.S. ROAD, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 4. H.VIMALADEVI AMMA, D/O. E.KESAVAN NAIR AGED 55 YEARS, SREEHARI, CHERUVIKKAL SREEKARYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 5. S.SUDHADEVI, D/O.K.BALAKRISHNA PILLAI AGED 55 YEARS, TC NO.17/598 PRA 71 PATHIRAPILLI LANE, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 6. P.N.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, S/O.T.NARAYANAN NAIR, AGED 55 YEARS, 'ATHIRA' TC NO.17/573 (3) PRA 161 ' NAGARUKAVU ROAD, POOJAPPURAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 7. A.MOHANAN NAIR, S/O.S.APPUKUTTAN NAIR AGED 55 YEARS,'KARTHIKA'CHEMPAZHANTHI PO SANGEETH NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 8. V.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, S/O.VASUDEVAN NAIR, AGED 55 YEARS, 'SIVARANJINI' TC 7/820 (1) HARI LANE, CHITTATTINKARA, VATTIYOORKAVU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.KRISHNADAS P. NAIR SMT.K.L.SREEKALA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SECRETARY CORPORATION OF TRIVANDRUM -695001 WPC NO.26714/10 -2- 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS,(LOCAL ADMINISTRATION) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 GOVT.PLEADER SRI.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU SRI.P.K.MANOJ KUMAR, SC, TVM CORPN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.26714 OF 2010(L) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T Heard both sides. 2. Petitioners are retired employee of the Thiruvanantapuram corporation. Their grievance is that their terminal benefits have not been disbursed so far. Referring to Ext.P2, petitioners submit that sufficient funds have been made available by the Government and that despite the same, beneficiaries are not disbursed. Complaining of the above, they have filed Ext.P3 representation before the first respondent and there was no response to Ext.P3. It is in these circumstances the writ petition is field. 3. If as stated by the petitioners, towards terminal benefits due to them, Government have made available sufficient funds to the Corporation, there is no reason why the amount shall not be disbursed. 4. Be that as it may, now that the petitioners' representation is pending before the first respondent I direct the first respondent to pass orders on Ext.P3. This the first respondent shall do duly WPC.No. 26714/2010 :2 : adverting to the relevant orders and as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/