IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 430 of 2003 (S/B) Kamta Prasad Vishwakarma ……Petitioner. Versus State of Uttaranchal and another. …Respondents. Mr. C.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bindesh Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. Khehar, C.J, (Oral) 1. Through the instant Writ Petition, the petitioner had sought release of his salary for the period from 29.7.2001 to 3.5.2002. 2. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the respondents that the arrears of salary claimed by the petitioner amounting to Rs. 36,882/- were released to him as far back as on 24.9.2007. It is further the contention of the learned counsel for the respondents that if any further balance is due as payable to the petitioner on account of salary for the period, referred to hereinabove, the same would also be released by the respondents. 3. In view of the above, as of now, it will be taken that the amount due to the petitioner was released to him by the respondents on 24.9.2007. In case any further amount is due towards salary for the period from 29.7.2001 to 3.5.2002, the petitioner shall make a representation in connection therewith to respondent no. 1, within one month from today, along with a certified copy of this order. In case such a representation is made by the petitioner within the time stipulated hereinabove, a decision thereupon shall be taken by respondent no. 1, i.e. Secretary, State of Uttarakhnad, Dehradun within a 2 further period of one month, whereupon whatever is due to the petitioner in addition to what has already been released to him, shall be calculated and paid to him on or before 31st July, 2010. 4. The instant Writ Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C.J.) 14.5.2010 Rathour