IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Crim. Writ Petition No.1646 of 2006 Ashok Punju Wagh ..Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents Shri N.N.Gavnekar for petitioner. Shri D.S.Mhaispurkar,A.P.P. for respondents. CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. 5th December,2006 5th December,2006 5th December,2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel. 2. The learned A.P.P. has produced the order dated 30th November, 2006 categorising the petitioner Ashok Kunju Wagh in category of 28 years of total imprisonment including all remissions subject to the completion of actual imprisonment of 14 years and subject to the condition of good behaviour and conduct in prison. Similar order has been passed in the matter of coaccused Anup Pratapsingh Varma and thus both the accused have been categorised in one and the same category namely category of 28 years as per the guidelines issued under sec.432 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In view of these orders the learned Counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the fresh order passed on 30th November, 2006. Leave granted. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty. Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.)