1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR CANO.4891 OF 2007 IN F.A.ST.NO.7335 OF 2007. M.S.R.T.C. through Divisional Controller .vs.. Smt.Shakilabi wd/o Syed Abdul and ors. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==- C ORAM : C.L.PANGARKAR, J. DATED : 27th August, 2009. Heard Mr.S.C.Mehadia, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.R.D.Bhuibhar, learned counsel for the respondents. This application has been filed for condonation of delay. The Tribunal had passed an award against the present appellant directing it to pay 40% of the compensation payable to the claimants. It further directed that 60% of the amount which is payable by respondent nos.1 and 2 be also paid initially by the present appellant, which appellant may recover from original respondents no.7 and 8. This order is under challenge. There is a delay in filing the appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant state that the appellant was all the while under impression that the decree may not be executed against the appellant and may be executed against original respondent nos.1 and 2 and therefore, it chose not to file the appeal. Learned counsel further submits that because the execution is now filed, 2 the appellant moved this appeal. In view of this, the delay stands condoned. The appeal be registered. List the matter on 7/9/2009. JUDGE. chute