:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1287 OF 2005 Hatture Shivanand Shrishail ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr.P.R. Arjunwadkar, for the Applicant. Mr.K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 28th February 2005 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. As there is direct evidence to indicate the complicity of the Applicant, as he has been named by the eye-witnesses, who have deposed that he assaulted Dnyaneshwar, father of the complainant, and which evidence is corroborated by the injury certificate, coupled with the fact that the knife used by the :2: Applicant has been recovered at the instance of the Applicant under section 27 of the Evidence Act, not a case for bail. I see no reason to depart from the well-reasoned order passed by the lower Court in rejecting the bail application of the present Applicant. Hence, dismissed. . As the bail application is rejected, the Sessions Judge, Solapur, is directed to assign the case to the Fast Track Court, if not already done, to ensure early disposal of the trial. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)