IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4327 of 2010 Between: Muppavarapu Suguna. … Petitioner And Dhooli Viswaprasad. … Respondent This Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4327 of 2010 ORDER:- Petitioner/defendant filed this revision under Article 227 of the Constitution, to revise the dismissal order, dated 27.07.2010, passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tuni in I.A.No.408 of 2010 in O.S.No.450 of 2006 filed for sending the suit promissory note along with the service register of her husband to the handwriting expert. Since no specific document contemporaneous to the suit promissory note has sought to be compared with the signature on the suit promissory note, the trial court rightly dismissed the I.A. as the signatures of her husband on the service register are not in proximity to the signature on the promissory note. No illegality is discernable with the order passed by the trial court, warranting interference by this Court. It is open for the petitioner, if any contemporaneous signature proximity to the suit promissory note of her deceased husband is available, she can seek to refer the admitted signature for comparison. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J 22nd October 2010 lmv