IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.35063 of 2010 HARIOM GUPTA, S/O Nagendra Prasad Gupta, R/O. Mohalla – Shahmir Takya, P.S. – Civil Lines, District – Gaya. ………………. Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ………………. Opp. Party. ----------- 02/ 08.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is a case for an offence, which is a bailable in nature, in view of Section 16 (A)(1) as well as Section 20 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Having regard to the submission, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. In view of the submission that the offence is bailable, as the anticipatory petition is not maintainable for bailable offence, prayer is rejected. Kundan (Gopal Prasad, J.)