{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION NO.191 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO8289 OF 2010 Syed Ahmed Hussain @ Syed Mannan s/o Ali Hasan & another Petitioners Versus Gangabai d/o Deorao Kadam Respondent Mr.S.G.Chapalgaonkar, advocate for petitioners Mr.S.R.Choukidar, Adv. for respondent CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 15 th October, 2010 PER COURT: 1 This is an application seeking review of the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.8289 of 2010. 2 It is brought to my notice that the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, while entertaining Revision Application, has passed an order granting stay to the execution, operation and implementation of the order passed on 06.04.2010 by the Deputy Collector, Land Records, Parbhani in Case No.2009-H- TNC-103/Kavi/51. It is also informed that civil litigation is initiated and is pending between the parties. Learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Purna, while entertaining application presented by {2} applicants herein at Exhibit-5 seeking restraint order against defendants, has directed all the defendants, including respondent herein, to maintain status quo in respect of transfer of suit property by any means. 3 It is well established that revenue entries are subject to final outcome of the civil litigation as well as any other substantive litigation determining rights and entitlement of the parties. Thus, the orders passed by Revenue Tribunal, while entertaining stay application, as well as by Civil Court on Exhibit-5, shall have precedence over the orders passed by revenue authorities. The parties are free to get their rights determined from the competent forum. Review Application is without substance. 4 Review Application, therefore, stands rejected. R.M.BORDE JUDGE adb/rp191.10