IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 14524 of 2008. Decided on: June 28, 2011. Bal Krishan Sharma ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and ors. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The surviving grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is only with regard to the claim of subsistence allowance w.e.f. February 2006 till July 2006. According to the petitioner, subsistence allowance has been reduced to 50% from 90% during the said period. It is pointed out that as per FRS 53 (1) (ii) (a) (ii), there is no justification for the reduction since there is no case for the respondents that the petitioner is at fault at any count. There is no reference to this aspect in the reply. Therefore, we are of the view that the matter requires re-consideration with notice to the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of as follows:- The petitioner may submit his surviving grievances by way of an appropriate representation before the first respondent 2 within a period of one month from today, in which case the respondent shall look into the same with notice to the petitioner and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law within another three months. 2. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 28th June, 2011 ( Justice Sanjay Karol ), (pankaj/vt) Judge.