1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 870 OF 2010 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.121 OF 2010 Mr.Arif Usman Kazi .... Petitioner vs Sr.Polikce Inspector of Police & ors. .... Respondents Mr. Kuldeep Patil for the petitioner. Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for State. Mr.J.A.Khan for the intervenor in APPW 121/2010. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 8th June, 2010 P.C.: 1 We have heard Mr.Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2 The petitioner is praying for directions to the Senior Police Inspector, Nagpada Police Station to register and investigate his complaint at Exhibit “A”. On 29.04.2010, the learned APP, on instructions, stated before this Court that the complaint was transferred to MRA Marg Police Station and on receipt of the same, the petitioner was called for recording his statement, but he did not turn up. The petitioner had shown his willingness to visit the MRA Marg Police Station within one week and the said statement was accepted. Accordingly, the petitioner has 2 visited the said Police Station and his statement has been recorded on 05.05.2010. Mrs. Shinde, learned APP, on instructions, states that the said statement will be dealt with as per law. 3 The complaint of the petitioner seems to be the alleged illegal transfer of the property in which he was one of the tenants and it was pointed out that the affidavit and the mutation entry No.458/2009 effected in favour of Mohamed Rafiq Gulam Mohamed Tungekar, Rahimuddin Gulam Mohammed Tungekar, Farrukh Naeem Haindade, Mohammed Muzamil Gulam Mohammed Tungekar were apparently illegal. We need not go into the details of these allegations. The petitioner’s statement has been recorded by the MRA Marg Police Station and it will be further dealt with as per law and hence no further directions are required to be given in the petition. Undoubtedly, if the Police Station does not take any further steps to register the F.I.R., the petitioner’s remedy before the Civil Court as well as to file private complaint is not affected. 4 The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. 5 The above Criminal Application No.121/2010 does not survive and hence disposed of accordingly. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) ( B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)