In the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital. Criminal Revision No. 304/2001 (Old No. 864/1998) Makhan Lal ….. Revisionist. Vs. State of U.P ….Respondent. Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. None appear for the revisionist. Heard Sri Lalit Verma learned A.G.A. and perused the record of the revision petition. 2- This revision was not admitted when it was filed before the Allahabad High Court against the judgment dated 5.3.1998 whereby the Sessions Judge, Tehri Garhwal dismissed the appeal of the revisionist and affirmed the conviction and sentence under section 379 I.P.C. as recorded by the C.J.M. Tehri Garhwal in criminal case n o. 838/1993, State vs. Makhan Lal. Perusal of the judgments of the courts below does not indicate any perversity in the appreciation of the evidence and therefore the revision petition can not be admitted. The same is dismissed in limine. Consign. (Irshad Hussain, J.) Dated 22.5.2004 ISB