IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-30588 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 30, 2009 Anup Singh and another … Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present : Mr. Surinder S. Kaliramna, Advocate, for the petitioners. S.D. Anand, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioners would be content if a direction is issued to respondent Nos. 2 and 3, to give notice under Section 160 Cr.P.C. to the petitioners in case they are required for the investigation of a case. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mrs. Neena Madan, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the State. The petition shall stand disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 (Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurgaon and S.H.O., P.S. Sector 10-A, Gurgaon, respectively) Crl. Misc. M-30588 of 2009 to give notice under Section 160 Cr.P.C. of the petitioners if they are required for the investigation of a case. This order would be operative for a period of three months from today. A copy of the order be given to the learned State counsel under the signatures of Special Secretary. October 30, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vkd Judge 2