WP(C) 8620/2005 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B. K. SHARMA Heard Md. A. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned State Counsel. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a directio n to the respondents to regularise his services as MR Worker. The prayer so made is on the basis of the particular scheme formulated by the Govt. of Assam provi ding that such MR Workers prior to 1.4.93 and who were in service on the date of launching the scheme, should be regularised in their services. The Full Bench of this Court had occasion to deal with the said scheme and as pe r its judgement reported in 2006(2) GLT654(FB) (Jitendra Nath Kalita Vs. State o f Assam and others) had held that the said scheme is not a valid scheme and the MR Workers cannot claim automatic regularisation of their services. It has also been held that the services already regularised need not be disturbed but no fur ther regularisation should be made. In view of the aforesaid Full Bench decision, the prayer made in the aforesaid w rit petition cannot be allowed. It will be open for the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with law. Writ petition stands disposed of.