IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.7449 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.12.2009 M/s Des and Des Commission Agents .....Petitioner versus Parminder Pal Singh and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.K.R.Dhawan, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 11.11.2009 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Zira, whereby an application moved by the petitioner to file a supplementary affidavit in the examination-in-chief, has been dismissed. Two cross-civil suits for recovery have been filed by the parties against each other. Both the suits have been consolidated on an application moved by the petitioner. The evidence has also been led by the parties in one of the suit which is to be read in both the cases. Thereafter, the petitioner moved an application under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC to file supplementary affidavit in the other suit in which no evidence has been C.R. No.7449 of 2009 (O&M) 2 recorded. The said application has been dismissed by the Civil Court, giving rise to this revision petition. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length and on perusal of the impugned order, I find no ground to interfere with the impugned order. Since no evidence has been led by the parties in the suit in which the petitioner wants to file the supplementary affidavit, the trial Court has committed no error of jurisdiction in declining the petitioner's prayer. Dismissed. 15-12-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE