HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ’ DB: Hon’bleShri Dhirendra Mishra & HOn’ble, Shri Rangnath Chandr’akar , ‘JJ. Writ Petition (C) N0. 5842 of 2010 Petitioner Raghav Advertising, Na‘thani Comp!ex _, Shyam Nagar Ra’pur Through Shri Ritesh Krishna Agrawal S/o KK Agrawal aged about 35 years R/o Behind I.T.I., Near Gurudwara, §hyam , Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Vs.. ' Respondent Municipal ‘ Corporation Bilaspur ‘ Through the CommiSSioner MumCIpaI Corporation Bliaspur (C G) Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Present Dr N K Shukla Sr Advocate With Shri Shaiiendra Shukia counsel for the petitioner ' Shri Mateen Siddiqui, counsel for the respondent. ' O R A L O R D E R (Passed on 6th Aprii, 201 1) Per Dhirendra Mishra, J Heard. ¥ .1. Shri Mateen SiddiqUi, learned counsel for the respondent/Municipal Corporation submits that the instant writ petition is mainiy directed : against the order of Annexure R41, whereby while forfeiting the r security deposit-of the petitioner he has also been‘ blacklisted for participating in any tender floated by Municipal Corporation Bilaspur for the finanCial year 201 0-2011 The finanCIal year has already come to an end on 31,“ ’of March, 2011 and thus this petition has become ‘ v infructuous. 2. Dr‘ N.K. Shukla, Sr. Advocate with Shri Shailendra Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings for recovery of forfeited amount, in accordance with iaw'. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with aforesaid Iiberty, as the same has become infructuous. Sdl— Sd/- R‘ RANGANATH CHANDRAKAR Dhirendra Mishra ’ Judge 2 ‘Judge’r , i RI