IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17317 of 2011 1. Dhiraj Ranjan, son of Priya Ranjan Sharma, resident of Mohalla- Bhavanipur Zirat, P.S. Chhatauni, Distt. East Champaran 2. Ravi Kumar, son of Dr. Sachida Nand Pd., resident of Sri Krishna Nagar, P.S. Motihari Town Distt. East Champaran 3. Md. Ashhad, son of Dr. Md. Firoz Ahmad, resident of Shishwan, P.S. Banjaria, Distt. East Champaran 4. Rijawanullah Thakurain, son of Azimullah Haque, resident of Chhatauni, P.S. Bara, Distt. Bara ( Nepal) 5. Rakesh Kumar, son of Sri Maulachand Mishra, resident of Barharwa Kala, P.S. Kotwan ,Distt. East Champaran 6. Chanda Kumari D/O Ram Prakash Das, resident of Gara, P.S. Bhagwanpur, Distt. Begusarai 7. Rupam, D/O Pramod Kumar Singh, resident of Sri Krishna Nagar, P.S. Motihari Town Distt. East Champaran Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Commissioner Cum Secretary Department Of Health and Medical Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 2. Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, through its Vice Chancellor 3. The Registrar, Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur 4. The Controller of Examination, Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur 5. Rabindranath Mukherjee Ayurved Chikitsa Mahavidyalaya through its Managing Committee, P.S. Motihari Muffasil, Distt. East Champaran 6. Principal Incharge Sri Indra Deo Singh, Rabindra Nath Mukherjee Ayurved Chikitsa Mahavidyalaya, At And P.O. Motihari Muffasil, Distt. East Champaran ----------- 02. 18.11.2011 The Court fails to understand as to why every citizen has to approach the High Court for similar kind of direction or relief when in similar circumstances the Court had already occasion to give a direction to do what is required to be done. The issue in the present writ is publication of result of 1st year B.A.M.S. students for the session 2007-08. These petitioners also had appeared in the said examination along with many similarly situated persons and the result was not 2 published. They have had to come to this High Court by filing of a writ application, which ultimately culminated into even filing of contempt application. In the contempt application after appearance of the Vice Chancellor, Examination Controller and the Registrar of the University, direction was given to publish the result within a week. In that case, their results have been published. But these petitioners have been made to come to this Court seeking a similar direction. Since there is similarity of the dispute in question, therefore, a direction is issued upon the Vice Chancellor of the University that steps have to be taken for publication of results of these petitioners as well unless there is some legal impediment coming in their way. Court expects the publication of their results within two weeks from the date of furnishing a copy of this order or else the reason for non-publications also will be made to them within the same time frame. Writ is disposed of with above direction. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)