R"^" E & lv IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRITPETITION NO.^Z^ OF 2006 PETITIONER: Smt. Man Bai, wife of Shri Madanlal Kothari, aged about ,'<=<- 80 years, permanent ^-i^,-'?•••'...•••" resident of Mumbai, through e>a...-" ^•^?^.^-"" •y- ^t®- ';/^:sfts!fs5?^. y '"'•'is—^3^'^ vs RESPDN&ENTS: r^y^o?^ sn- i-->' ^' .&u G. a\Lf»>5VU« her brother and power of attorney holder Shri Inderchand Parekh, son of Shri Dharamchand Parekh, aged about 65 years, resident of Panchsheel Nagar, Raipur. 1.5tate of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, Raipur. 2. The Executive Engineer, Department of Water Resources / Irrigation, Raipur bivision, Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 *m<Ti a»»ifct» 3SrBTP(T5CT, ^Tfl'y'16, faciwy 'A3-? .Mo. 6><386/-ao6('> ^ 200 3ll2i!'l Ma<»)(lcli^'s«<iT) 3n^r%rR=ri?i (Wrsn^TgiiiR; Sr^ Q. ^ ^tiTSRBfStfan^T peutjiouer applicaat Ctee 11-1-2Q07 Shri Ajit StagtL, Advocate] Shri Utkarsh Venaa, Dy.l Hearct. By Uus peUtioa tUe 7-2006 passed by learaed 3^ whereby fhe applicauon of matter of Land Acquisitioa amount deposited in her name] holder either in cash or throli! rejected. Lcamect (Jounsel tor tti4 acqiusition proceedings, ia fac^, rcpresentiag fiie applicant order dated 12-5-2005, howev^r fhe Court below with an producecl despite eariier au-e< certificate that appUcant Man subnutted. Uiat to protect accoizat payee cneque ia iier] attoraey, , Shri Utkarsh Verraa, fhe State does not dispute appouited attomey ot appUca|it applicant Maa Devi Kothari 001 tii<iti"i<fl-) iiti<iTffteA<Riwit ^sri^iTsn^r tor Uie peuuoner. Govt. Advocate ibr fhe State. is inipugiung vae order dated 4- 'a Additional Uistrict Juctge, Kaipur Siat. Maa Devi Koftian in fhe No. 115/2002 for disbursing fhe ia tfae Court to her power of attoraey igh account payee cheque has been petitioner submits that ui ihe land , her attorae5r inderchaad Parakh was •oughout which is reflected from. the Uie application has been rejected by fhat the applicant is not being ;tion to this effect and no medical »eviKofhari is sick lias been filed. It is of appltcant Man Devi Kofhari, naine could be haaded over to her ttttou obseifvation Oevi m.t$rest leatnned thbt Dy. Govt, Advocate representing Shri Inderchand Parakh is validlv Mau Devi Koth.ari and interest of jild be protected by paying Uie aniouni -•-•-SBSSSSWfsSS.- VAKALATNAMA XI-HC-78 *11*1T11 SbHrei 3^' rtiwM<i, w^ww, hvimy, . L0-p.(<}o.<-^^/^<'°(? ^ 200 Sii^i ia<»i(licl?4<!<<^') sTi^rqirf^ire TOT 311^1 St)>< R<iraT^(T3n^r 2- deposited in her name iu th^ and by delivenag fhe same Uij- In view ot uie subiuiss] the petition is disposed ot disburse fhe amouat deposi^ Kotttan ui Lanct Acquisiuon cheque and send ftie same fh| qiiqffl'fl-l IWdTffte^t'rfSRZTC ^sif^iTsn^r .^ Court fhrough account payee cheque LJ-ough registered post. it>n luade by fhe Counsel for the parUes, ifrifb. a directiou to ttie Court below to ;d in fhe naine of applicant Maa Devi |Case No. 115/2002 by accountpayee I'ough i^gistered post in her address. Sd/- Dhirednra Mishra Judge P.T.O. ^