IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 4TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 13TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 32315 of 2008(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- E.MOHAMMED HAJI, S/O.AHAMMEDKUTTY, PARAMAL HOUSE, A.C.BAZAR, P.O.MOONNIYUR, PIN-676 311.MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.R.RAMADAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, CHELARI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, K.S.E.B, CIRCLE OFFICE,TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. ADV.SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M. JOSEPH, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 32315 OF 2008 V ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 4th day of November, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner challenges Ext.P11. 2. I heard learned standing counsel also. I feel that the petitioner has an alternate remedy by preferring appeal under section 127 of the Electricity Act. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of relegating the petitioner to prefer appeal under section 127 of the Electricity Act. It is ordered that there will be no disconnection of the power supply till the expiry of the period of limitation for preferring the appeal. Sd/- (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) aks // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE