In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CWP No.16866 of 2008 Date of decision: 23.12.2008 Ramesh Kumar .....Appellant versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: None for the petitioner(s). Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR J. Learned State counsel states that impugned transfer order has been cancelled and the instant petition had been rendered infructuous. A copy of the cancellation order has been placed on record as mark ' A'. The writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (M. M. KUMAR) JUDGE (K. KANNAN) JUDGE 23.12.2008 A. Kaundal