Crl. R No. 631 OF 2011 ****** Mohan Lal vs Naresh Kumari and others Present : Mr. C.L.Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. ******* This revision petition has been filed against the order dated 11.2.2011 whereby the defence of the petitioner has been struck off owing to the fact that he had not paid the interim maintenance. Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is ready to pay the interim maintenance and also whatever damages this Court may deem fit in this regard but the petitioner should not be foreclosed from leading his evidence. I find this to be a fair request. Consequently, this petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. In case, the petitioner deposits a sum of Rs.75,000/- with the trial Court tomorrow, the trial Court will grant two effective opportunities to the petitioner to lead his entire evidence. Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for the petitioner under the signatures of the Court Secretary. ( AJAY TEWARI ) March 16, 2011. JUDGE `kk'