AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.284 OF 2009 Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Sena ... Petitioner Vs. Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay & Thane District & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Ms. Ranjana Todankar for the petitioner. Ms. Lata Desai i/b Ms. Pallvi Divekar for respondent 1. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 19TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C.:- 1. In this petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed that a writ of mandamus be issued directing respondent 1 to register the security guards listed at Ex-A to the petition. 2. Learned counsel for respondent 1 states that the petitioner has made no application praying that the said AJN 2 security guards be registered. She submitted that it is improper for the petitioner to file such a petition praying that an order directing respondent 1 to register the security guards be passed in the absence of any application having been made by the petitioner. 3. We find some substance in the contention of respondent 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would make an appropriate application addressed to respondent 1 within a period of four weeks from today. Learned counsel for respondent 1 states that if such an application is made, respondent 1 shall dispose it of in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. These statements are accepted. 4. The petition is disposed of in terms of the statements made by learned counsel. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.]