IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.3727 of 2005 Between: 1 B.E.M. Aided Elementary School, Ramadaspet, Rajahmundry East Godavari District, Rep. by its Correspondent K. Prabhakar Rao. 2 Esther Axene Residential Aided High School, Konthamur, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District, Rep. by its Correspondent K. Prabhakar Rao. 3 Esther Axene Residential Aided High School, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District, Rep. by its Correspondent K. Prabhakar Rao. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 State of A.P., rep. by its Secretary, School Education, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner of School Education, A.P., Hyderabad. 3 The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 4 The District Educational Officer, at Kakinada. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in seeking to apply and enforce the provisions of the ban on recruitments issued by the Government in Memo dated 20.10.2004, despite there was directions of this Hon'ble High Court in favour of the petitioner institutions for processing of the proposals for filling up of the vacant aided posts in the institutions as being arbitrary and illegal, violative of Article 14 and 30 (1) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to process the proposals of the petitioner institutions for filling up of the vacant posts and issue such other writ or order or direction as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.CH.SAMSON BABU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.3727 of 2005 ORDER: When the matter has been taken up for hearing on 22-04-2008, none appeared for the petitioners and as such, the matter has been posted “for dismissal”. Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, neither learned counsel for the petitioners is present nor is there any representation on their behalf. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 29-04-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{CHRK}