feMI,l<E<MteuliUi!«!ii««**S c^<(< IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTLSGARH AT BILASPUR s;ci M.A.(C.) No....^..to.X.../2010(D.B.) Apnellants CClaimants) , y- ^»-- y^w>1- ,A®6-"'...^fe :::^^- 3) Suruj Bai Thakur W/o Late Kripa Ram Thakur, Caste Gond, aged about: 48 years, Aghnu Ram Thakur S/o Late Kripa Ram Thakur, Caste Gond Aged about 26 years, Aman Thakur S/o Late Kripa Ram Thakur, Caste Gond Aged about 18 years, Re&pondents All are resident of village Nahar Khapri, Post Tamora, Police Station Aanda, Tahsil Gundardehi Disttrict Durg (C.G.) Versus 1) Mukesh Kumar Thakur, aged ahout 28 years, S/o Sharda Charan Singh, R/o Subhash Chandra Ward Kanker Post Subhash Chandra Kanker, TahsU 85 District Kanker (C.G.) V •^ 2) Smt. Pushpa Kachlam W/o N.R. Kachalam, R/o Shri Ram Nagar Ward, Kodejunga Collony Kanker, Tahsil & District Kanker (C.G.) 3) The Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Through Branch Manager Branch Office c-/r<?^ ""T" •-"sty^"^— .^ie'i'- ^ -T^ Calcutta, Branch Manager Branch Office, Ahead of Vijya Bank Nehru Nagar Bhilai, Tahsil & District Durg (C.G.) <1«E-»-!-'" MEMO OF MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 FOR ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION AWARD H HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGMttl ATBIIASPUR Sincite Bench: Hon'Me Shri JusUce Prashant Kimiar Mishia APPELLANTS RESPQNDENTS MA<Ct N0.568 Of 2010 Sumj Bai Thakur and dhere. Versus Mukesh Kumar Thakur and othere. MtSCELLANEOUS JWWEAL UNDER SECTKW 173 OF NKJTOR VEH1CUEACT.1988 Shn J.S.P. Chandrasen, counset forthe a^pellarts. ORAL OR R (22.08.2018) Heard on admisston. (2) The appellants / ctaiinants are the widow ara:! sons of cteceased Krsparam Thakur, who died on acoount of mrtor accident on 20-(B-2X)9 involving motor vehtete tearing No. C.G.19-0/0227. The appeltants claimed that the deceseed was eaming Rs.3,000/- per month and was aged about 54 years. Ttw teamed Claims Tribunal has arecepted the mCTrthly mcome of the deceased at Rs.3,CXXy- per month and deducted 1^t towarite his pere<»ial expenses and after ass^sing the d^endency at Rs.2,000/- per mcnth, the annual dependency hes been essessed at Rs.24,00(y- per year. Muttij^ier of eoht has been appBed taki(^ ttie age <rf deceaswi as % years stwwn in the requisition for post mortem. In ackWion the Ctaims Tribunal ha®awarded Rs.5,000/- to the widow for loss of consortium, Rs.8,QO(V- towards loss of estate and Rs.2,000/- for funeral expenses, thus total amount of Rs.2,07,000/- tes been ^warded in favour of the daimante. -f-~s ''3"^. v;'Aft-:^d(^ .<? JJ ^..""'•^^' 2-- <4) The amount award«ito the appeltante / claimants appears to be just and fair. There is no scope for enhancement in the awarded amount. (5) The instant appeal faite and is hereby disiris^d at the admission stage. — - - — Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge •^.