Civil Revision No.1065 of 2003 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1065 of 2003 Date of decision : 6-8-2009 Harjit Kaur ....Petitioner VERSUS Jabarjang Singh and another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA Present: Mr. S.C. Chhabbra, Advocate, for the petitioner. RAJIVE BHALLA, J. The petitioner challenges an order dated 4-9-2002, passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ferozepur dismissing his objection petition filed for dismissal of an execution petition. The petitioner, who is admittedly a transferee pendente lite filed objections under Order 21 Rule 98 asserting that though the suit had been dismissed by the trial court by holding that the agreement is false and fictitious, his vendor and the plaintiff entered into a compromise, thus adversely affecting his rights. It is submitted that as the petitioner has pleaded fraud, the executing court should have entertained the objections, examined the plea of fraud and set aside the judgment and decree dated 17-11-1997 as it is vitiated by fraud. I have heard counsel for the petitioner. Order 21 Rule 102 prohibits a transferee pendente lite from filing any application / objections under Order 21 Rule 98 and Rule 100 of the Code. The Civil Revision No.1065 of 2003 -2- petitioner is admittedly a transferee pendente lite. As a result, the objections filed by the petitioner are not maintainable. It however appears that in addition to the objections, the petitioner has also filed a civil suit which is pending adjudication. The dismissal of this petition would not in any manner affect the rights of the petitioner in the pending civil suit, if any. The petition is dismissed with the aforementioned observations. (RAJIVE BHALLA) 6-08-2009 JUDGE manju