IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR fC.G.) MISC .CTVIL CASE No.: - ^^ /2010 S.B. .jr^~ ^v ^^' ..••^'•^y ^>'^" ^•-"" S^sj^i APPLICANTS:- l. Dhruv Mishra, Age- 36 Yrs rPlaintiffsl S/0 Late Jaggannath Mishra, 2. Sint.Sudha Mishra, Age-29 Yrs W/0 Shri Dhruv Misha, Both the above are R/0 -Bhaisa-Dafie, Haldi-Badi, Chirimiri, Tahsil-Khadgawan, Distt.- Korea (C.G.) :VERSUS: Lal Sai, Age-49 Yrs S/0 Shri Huwa Sai, R/0-MohanColony, Haldi-Badi, Chirimiri, Tahsil-Khadgawan, Distt.- Korea (C.G.) -:APPLICATION FOR THE RESTORATION OF THE F.A.No:- 188/2009. ORDER Dtt.27/01/2010: - [Defendantl la 3TI^5Tq5Tf^TW WIT3n^9T®qiq? lart'1 ^^q -qiqie^l^ ^^TTS, f^TO^? mTOi^*riw ..'^.6........^5r.......... ^2ofo 3T^9TiracP(l^fg6|^) ^RTTWf^rf^TOT^^T ^rafe^'m^'^fe(^^R5R ^3Tf^T3TT^$T S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Aaarwal 09.02.2010 Shri S.A. Ansari, Advoc^te for applicants. Heard on application foil restoration 6f F.A. No. 188/2009. Learned counsel appe^ring for the applicants submits that the counsel for the applican|:s could not appear on account of bonafide mistake, therefore, F|A No. 188/09, vvhich was dismissed on 27.01.2010, may be restorjed to its original file. On due consideration, 1 am satisfied that the counsel for applicants is succeeded in ejxplaining the cause of his absence, therefore, the application is ajjowed and FA No. 188/09 Is restored to its originai file. A copy of this order pe piaced on record of the origjnal appeal and the same be listep for hearing after two weeks. Sahu Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge