1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO. 302/1999 (Kanchandevi Bhagirati Goenka Versus Rameshchand Gorelal Tiwari & another) - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders. Shri D.V. Chauhan, counsel for the appellant. Shri V.V. Deo, counsel for the respondent no.1. CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J. DATED : 30 th JULY, 2008. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The counsel for the parties have presented a compromise pursis in the Court, today. The pursis is taken on record and marked as Exhibit 'Z'. The compromise pursis dated 30.07.2008 is signed by the appellant as well as the respondent no.1. It is submitted on behalf of the parties that the respondent no.2 is not a contesting party in the present matter. The compromise pursis is also signed by the counsel for the appellant and the counsel for the respondent no.1. The appellant as well as the respondent no.1 are personally present in the Court, today. I have personally enquired from the parties, who are present in the Court, today as to whether they agree on the terms stated in the compromise pursis. Both, the appellant as well as the respondent no.1 have informed the Court that 2 they have signed the compromise pursis after understanding the terms thereof. They have further informed the Court that they are ad-idem over the terms mentioned in the compromise. I have perused the terms of the compromise. The terms of the compromise are just and reasonable and are not unfair. By the terms of the compromise, the appellant tenant and her family members have agreed to handover the possession of the rented premises presently occupied by them within a maximum period of two years i.e. on or before 29.07.2010 to the Res. no.1. It is further agreed between the parties that the time period of two years shall not be extended on any count. The parties further agree that they would further file similar compromise pursis, for vacation of the tenanted premises within a maximum period of two years from today i.e. on or before 29.07.2010, in the Regular Civil Suit No.210/2007 which is filed by the respondent no.1 against the appellant for recovery of possession of the tenanted premises and is still pending in the Small Causes Court as on today. Since the parties have agreed over the terms mentioned in the compromise and since the terms of the compromise are fair and reasonable, the second appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise pursis. 3 A decree be drawn accordingly. JUDGE APTE