1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 309 of 2007 (S/S) Sunil Kumar S/o Sri Chandi Prasad, Presently working as Para Medical Worker S.T.C. Clinic, Barkot, District Uttarkashi ………… Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary Department of Medical, Health and Family Welfare Secretariat Dehradun, 2. Director General, Medical Health & Family Welfare, Dehradun 3. Chief Medical Officer, Uttarkashi. ……..Respondents Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri N.S. Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Counsel for the parties are agreed that the writ petition may be decided at the admission stage itself. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- 1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to revise the pay scale admissible to the petitioner since 1986, for the post of Para Medical worker as it is granted to the para medical worker of the District Pithoragarh. 2. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to give all consequential benefits to the petitioner. 3. Issue any other order or direction which this Hon’ble High Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 4. Award cost of the petition to the petitioner. 2 Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the similarly situated persons have moved a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court and the same has already been allowed by the Allahabad High Court. However, the benefit of the same is not being given to the petitioners. Raising all his grievances, the petitioner has already moved a number of representations. Last representation was moved on 02.01.2007 before the Chief Medical Officer, Uttarkashi, which is still pending before him. Counsel for the petitioner has made a request that the respondent no. 3 be directed to take decision on the representation in view of the Allahabad High Court’s judgment dated 29th April, 1999. The prayer is innocuous. Consequently, I direct the respondent no. 3 to take decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 02.01.2007, Annexure 6 to the writ petition within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. In case, the respondent no. 3 is not a competent authority to take decision on the issues by the petitioner in his representation, he will forward the same to the competent authority with his remarks within the period prescribed aforesaid. With this direction, the writ petition is finally disposed of. 03.04.2007 (M.M. Ghildiyal, J.) VKS