IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 24TH JANUARY 2011 / 4TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 2356 of 2011(T) --------------------- PETITIONER : -------------------- 1. UMA MAHESWARI.S, LPSA, S.D.P.Y.(M) L.P.SCHOOL, PALLURUTHY, KOCHI. 2. JIJESH.A.A, LPSA, S.D.P.Y. (M) L.P.SCHOOL, PALLURUTHY, KOCHI. 3. T.P.PRAJITHA, ANJILATE HOUSE, P.D.ROAD, PALLURUTHY, KOCHI-6. BY ADVS. SRI.K.T.SHYAMKUMAR SRI.HARISH R. MENON RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MATTANCHERRY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN 682 002. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ERNAKULAM, PIN 682 011. 3. THE MANAGER, S.D.P.Y. (M) L.P.SCHOOL, PALLURUTHY, KOCHI, PIN 682 006. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. NISHA BOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.2356/2011-T ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 24th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioners 1 and 2 are working as L.P.S.As in S.D.P.Y.(M).L.P School, Palluruthy and the third petitioner had earlier worked in a leave vacancy in the said school which is yet to be approved by the first respondent. The first respondent refused to grant approval for various appointments on the plea that appointments of two senior Rule 51A claimants were pending approval. Even though the Manager had filed an appeal, that has been dismissed. 2. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioners that by Ext.P9 order passed by the Government, the appointments of two senior Rule 51A claimants have been directed to be approved. Accordingly, it is pointed out that there is change of circumstances as of now and the objection taken against the approval of the petitioners no longer survives. In these circumstances, the petitioners have filed Exts.P10 to P12 representations before the Assistant W.P.(C). No.2356/2011 -:2:- Educational Officer. It is prayed that the Assistant Educational Officer may be directed to take appropriate decision in the matter in the light of Ext.P9 order. 3. There will be a direction to the Assistant Educational Officer to take appropriate decision on Exts.P10 to P12 representations in the light of Ext.P9 order passed by the Government with notice to the petitioners and the third respondent within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. The petitioners will produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of the Judgment before the first respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Sd/- (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms \\TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE