IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10576 of 2011 SANDEEP KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SRI NATHU SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 04.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report. Subsequently, the name of this petitioner has come in this case when the son of the informant expressed his doubt against the petitioner. In course of investigation, the print out of the mobile of petitioner as well as victim were taken out and it was found that at the time of alleged occurrence the victim was present in Purnea. Moreover, except the aforesaid materials, there is nothing against the petitioner. The petitioner happens to be business partner of the victim. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Purnea Sadar P.S. Case No. 405 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )