IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13795 of 2008 THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS Versus AMARJEET KUMAR CHOUDHARY ----------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, C.G.C. ------------ P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal -------------- Dated, the 23rd September, 2008. In paragraphs 4 and 5 of the order impugned, the Tribunal observed thus: “When asked by the Tribunal, the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the post of GDS was offered to the applicant. If the Tribunal directs, which was indicated by the Tribunal itself, the Department would consider posting of the applicant if vacancy was available or when vacancy occurs. The fact remains that a post of GDS BPM was offered to the applicant though he did not join on that post, When being asked, the learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is ready to join the post of GDS BPM, preferably in Vaishali District, which is his home District.” 2. The counsel for the petitioners submits that the counsel for the present petitioners (respondents therein) were not authorized to make such submission. 3. We are afraid, submission of the counsel for the petitioners is hardly acceptable. - 2 - 4. The order of the Tribunal does not call for any interference. 5. Writ petition is dismissed in limine. R.M. Lodha, CJ. Kishore K. Mandal, J. Anil/