@ Co¢hmp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH w.P.(c) No. 45” 12006 :IL PETITIONER Kanshi Ram, aged about 36 years, S/o Dukhu Ram, R/o. Village Akaltara, Tahsil Simga, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. RESPONDENTS Churawan Lal Sahu S/o. Kanshi Ram Sahu, R/o. Akaltara (Madher) Tah. Simga, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Nohar Das S/o Punit Ram Satnami. Panch Ram Banjary S/o Budhu Satnami Prakash S/o Ganga Ram Satnami. Bed Ram S/o. Late! Yadu Sube Lal Dahre S/o Phool Singh Satnami. Yemu Lal Sahu S/o Bisouha Ram Sahu Res.no.2 to No.7 R/o. of Village Akaltara, Tah. Simga, Distt. Raipur 8. State of C.G. Through : Election Officer (Tahsildar), Simga, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer & Prescribed Authority‘ Bhatapara, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA EVA; IGH COURT {)F CHHATISGARH AT BILASPUR FI WRIT PETITION (C) No. 45 0f2007 : Kanshi Ram VERSUS : Churawan Lal Sahg & Others , ’‘ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRIT FETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CGNSTITUIION OF INDIA s3: Hongble Sm Satish K. Agmmtn'. J. I’resent: Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arvind Dubey? Advocate for the respondent No. 1. Shri N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (0RAL) (Passed on 21$ day 0f October, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that since the a fresh election has taken place, thus, nothing survives in this petition for adjuciication at this stage and the petition has become infmetuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side do not controveit the 1 above submission. i 3. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as having become :XAX infructuous. ‘ d/_ Satish ; Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ iJudge Gown