IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4355 OF 2008 Ravindra Pachpohar ..vs.. Vinod Pachpohar & others =================================== CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE: 6.10.2008 Heard Advocate Sable for petitioner / original plaintiff. Court below has appointed an advocate as Commissioner to verify the crop pattern and position and to submit the report. The plaintiff is claiming that he has sown 2 acres of suit field. While defendants claim that they have sown entire six acres thereof. According to defendants there are orange trees in the entire six acres. While plaintiff mentions that it is soyabin and cotton crops in 2 acres. Court below has given reasons for appointing commissioner. There is no failure to exercise jurisdiction or perversity in the matter. After the report is received the court can apply its mind to that report as also to know other documents on record and reach appropriate conclusion. No case is made out warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. Writ petition dismissed. JUDGE smp.