IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14239 of 2009 MANISH SHARMA, SON OF LATE RANJEET SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KALI FATEHPUR, P.S. BELAGANJ, DISTRICT GAYA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 23.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case is under sections 302, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the first information report, this petitioner and one Sanjit Kumar have been named as assailants of the deceased. However, in the statements of the father and mother of the deceased recorded under Section 164, Cr.P.C. which are annexed as Annexure-2 series, altogether a different story has been given by them and in their statements, this petitioner has not been named as assailant. It is stated that said Sanjit Kumar, who has also been named as assailant including the petitioner, has been allowed bail by this Court vide order dated 5.3.2008 passed in Cr. Misc. No.56124 of 2207. From the order passed in the case of Sanjit Kumar, it appears that taking into consideration the statements of the parents of the deceased under Section 164, Cr.P.C. bail - 2 - application of Sanjit Kumar was allowed. Considering the above circumstances and particularly, considering the bail order passed in the case of Sanjit Kumar and the statements of the parents of the deceased under Section 164, Cr.P.C., the application is allowed. Petitioner (Manish Sharma) is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No.179/2006. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)