Civil Revision No. 4287 of 2007 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 4287 of 2007 Date of Decision: 30.10.2008 Jagdish Singh …Petitioner Versus Kulwinder Singh and Others ... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sumeet Mahajan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Kiran Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.4. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) Two Courts below had held that the petitioner was not inducted as tenant as he was sub-tenant. His eviction has been caused on this ground. At the outset, Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate, appearing for the petitioner, has stated that he will not be in position to dislodge the concurrent findings of fact recorded by two Courts below as he is conscious that revisonal Court cannot re-appreciate and re-appraise the evidence. He has stated that the petitioner has been carrying on the business under the name & style of M/s Verma Iron Store, therefore, this Civil Revision No. 4287 of 2007 2 Court should consider and provide sufficient time to make alternative arrangement so that the petitioner may be able to establish his business at other place. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that in the facts and circumstances of the case, one year's time be granted to the petitioner and he be permitted to withdraw the present revision petition. Mr. Sumeet Mahajan, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate, is appearing on behalf of the landlord. On instructions from Mr. Amandeep Singh, Mr. Mahajan has stated that in case petitioner furnish an undertaking before learned Rent Controller that after one year peaceful and vacant possession will be handed over to the landlord and use & occupation charges till today are deposited before learned Rent Controller and thereafter rent of every month is tendered on or before 7th of each month, he has no objection if one year time is granted. Mr. Mahajan further stated that he has agreed to this arrangement as there should be amicable parting between the parties and no ill-will should remain between the petitioner and the respondent. In view of the statements made by learned counsel for the parties, it is ordered that the petitioner shall continue to remain in possession of the demised premises for a period of one year from today upto 1.11.2009. Thereafter, he shall hand over peaceful possession to respondents No.1 to 3 and an undertaking to this effect shall be furnished by the petitioner before learned Rent Controller. The use & occupation charges till 1.11.2008 shall be deposited by the petitioner before learned Rent Controller on or before 30.11.2008. Thereafter, use & occupation charges for each month shall be deposited on or before 7th of each month. Civil Revision No. 4287 of 2007 3 In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge October 30, 2008 “DK”