1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 5465 OF 2010 Smt. Aruna Kisanrao Ghorpade & anr. v. State of Maharashtra & ors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's and Registrar's orders orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.U. Nemade Advocate for the Petitioners. ..... CORAM: V.C. DAGA & A.B.CHAUDHARI, JJ. DATED : 06 th DECEMBER, _2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The claim of petitioner no.1 was rejected since she had crossed the age of 40 years and her request for substituting the name of petitioner no.2 is also rejected for want of policy in that behalf. As per the policy of the State Government, person crossing the age of 40 years is not entitled to be appointed on compassionate ground nor any family member can be substituted in its place. Sofar as petitioner no.2 is concerned, after crossing the age of 40, petitioner no.1 had applied for substituting the name of petitioner no.2 in her place. That request was also rejected for want of policy. Under these circumstances, we do not find any fault with 2 the rejection of the claim of the petitioners since it is a policy decision of the State Government. The validity of the resolution which is being challenged is already upheld by the Aurangabad Bench of this Court. Writ petition is thus dismissed in limine. There shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE /TA/