1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR MISC.CIVIL APPLN.(RESTORATION) NO: 403/2008 IN W.P.NO. 1753/2007(D) (Ramesh Mahadeo Dhakate vs. Union of India and another) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders. ................................................................................................................................... CORAM: A .M.KHANWILKAR AND R.C.CHAVAN,JJ. DATED: 05th May, 2008. *** 1. In the morning session, when this Application was called out, Advocate appearing on behalf of Mr. S R Narnaware made a request to keep back the matter as the Advocate on record was held up in some other Court. That indulgence was shown. 2. When the matter was called out after lunch break as was indicated in the morning session to the concerned Advocate, none appears for the applicant. In the circumstances, this application deserves to be rejected. 3. Even if the petition was restored, we would have rejected the same for the same reason as noted in separate order passed today in the morning session in Writ Petition No. 2864/2007. For, even in the present case, caste certificate has been invalidated by the Committee. That order has become final. The same is not subject matter of challenge in this writ petition. Following the decision of Supreme Court in the case of 2 Union of India vs. Dattatraya and others reported in 2008(2) Mh.L.J.720, petition would necessarily fail. Hence this Application is rejected. 4. At this stage, Advocate on record Mr. S.R. Narnaware for the applicant appears and points out that this matter is different from the one decided in the morning session. We see no merit in this submission. JUDGE JUDGE sahare