IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.14798 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 12, 2011 Smt.Meena Devi ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Amit Kumar Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner, who was appointed as a Guest Teacher, has now been terminated from service on the ground that her employment was bad as she was less meritorious. Some of the Guest Teachers, who were issued show cause notices for termination of their services on various grounds, had earlier approached this court and all those writ petitions have been disposed of by issuing direction to such petitioners to appear before the Director Education and raise all the grounds that they may wish to urge against their termination or the proposed termination. Reference in this regard can be made to CWP No.4587 of 2011 (Naresh Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & others), decided on 5.8.2011. Notice of motion. On the asking of Court, Mr.Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the State. This writ petition is also disposed of in terms of the orders passed in Naresh Kumar's case (supra). August 12, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE