IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10526 of 2011 MD. DABLOO @ MD. SABIR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 31.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. It appears from submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was arrested by the police in a case registered under Arms Act and subsequently, he has been remanded in the instant case on the ground that looted mobile of this case has been recovered from possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that, as a matter of fact, the aforesaid seized mobile belongs to the petitioner but the police fabricated the evidence and framed the petitioner in the alleged crime. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Jogbani P.S. Case No. 59 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )