THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.29269 of 2010 DT.02.12.2010 Between: Smt.Ghousia Begum and others … Petitioners And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Prl.Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri S.R.Ashok, learned Senior Counsel For Sri M.V.Surayanarayana Counsel for respondents: Sri N.Sridhar Reddy, Spl.G.P. The Court made the following ORDER: ORDER: This writ petition is filed fort the following substantive reliefs: “(a) declaring the action of the Respondents in attempting to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property admeasuring Acs.5.00 gts., in Town Survey Nos.4 part and 5 part, Block ‘H’, Ward 10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad as illegal and arbitrary, (b) consequently directing the Respondents to consider and complete the regularization process vide Memo No.22213/AssnIII/I/07/1 Revenue Department, dated 11.05.2007 within the time limit as stipulated by the Hon’ble High Court; (c) and accordingly interdict the Respondents from interfering with the possession of the Petitioners on the said property.” The main grievance of the petitioners, represented by a General Power of Attorney, is that when their application for alienation of land admeasuring Acs.5.00 in Town Survey Nos.4 part and 5 part, Block ‘H’, Ward No.10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, at market value is pending before respondent No.1, the subordinates of respondent No.5 have started construction of compound wall and have been proposing to raise structures over a part of the land, in respect of which, the petitioners’ application is pending before respondent No.1. Sri N.Sridhar Reddy, learned Special Government Pleader, representing the learned Advocate General, on instructions, submitted that though a Cabinet Sub-Committee was constituted which met on some occasions to discuss the petitioners’ application, in view of recent political developments, the Sub-Committee, which was constituted, is unable to proceed further as at present. He has, however, assured that within a period of four weeks, respondent No.1 will ensure that the petitioners’ application is considered and disposed of. As regards the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners that respondent No.5 is raising constructions over a part of the land claimed by the petitioners, the learned Special Government Pleader has submitted that as far back as in the years 1981 and 1982, the land admeasuring Acs.8.10 guntas in Survey No.403 of Shaikpet Village was allotted to respondent No.5 and that having regard to the recent events causing disturbance to law and order, respondent No.5 is seeking to construct barracks over a part of the land allotted to it and that as an initial step towards this direction, a compound wall is being constructed with a plan to construct six barracks for the present. The learned Special Government Pleader, however, fairly stated that as the petitioners are claiming land over Town Survey Nos.4 part and 5 part and Survey No.4 is being occupied by Nala, respondent No.5 will avoid construction of barracks on both Town Survey Nos.4 and 5 till the disposal of the petitioners’ application by respondent No.1. In the light of the above facts, the writ petition is disposed of by placing on record the above-noted statements of the learned Special Government Pleader. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.Nos.37267 and 37960 of 2010 are dismissed as infructuous. (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) Date:02.12.2010 VGB