IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2007 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1929 WP(C).No. 8740 of 2007(M) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ S.MANIKANDAN, S/O.SUNDARAN, GANESHPURAM, PAMPAMPALLAM, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT: -------------------- THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BENJAMIN PAUL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 8740 of 2007(M) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE RESPONDENT DATED 12.8.2003. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE S.T.A.T. IN M.V.A.A.NO.880/2003 DATED 14.6.2004. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE RESPONDENT DATED 20.6.2005. --- BKN // TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ============ W.P.C. No. 8740 OF 2007 ------------------------------ Dated this the 18th day of June, 2007 ======================== JUDGMENT The petitioner filed an application for regular permit which was rejected by the respondent against which the petitioner filed statutory appeal before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal allowed the appeal and directed the respondent to grant regular permit in favour of the petitioner. Petitioner's complaint is that the respondent has not taken further steps, pursuant to Ext.P2 judgment of the Tribunal. Learned Government Pleader submits that the matter would be considered in the next meeting of the R.T.A. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the respondent to consider the application of the petitioner, as per Ext.P2 judgment within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If the RTA cannot meet within that time, decision shall be taken by circulation of papers, if permissible under law. S.SIRI JAGAN Judge. bkn