IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.16877 of 2009 Date of Decision: November 05, 2009 Balwinder Kaur .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & Another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Yogesh Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the division between males and females in 50-50 ratio is impractical in so much as in subjects such as Home Science, male teachers would not be available. Learned counsel, however, has not been able to point out from facts that such is the condition. I find the matter to be premature. The petition is disposed of as premature, however, with liberty to the petitioner to file a petition in case the male teachers are not available in a particular subject or female teachers are not available for CWP No.16877 of 2009 [2] subjects like Physical Education. (AJAI LAMBA) November 05, 2009 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?