IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10597 of 2010 MUKESH KUMAR SINGH, S/O SHRI YADUNANDAN PRASAD SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST OFFICE- KHANPUR, POLICE STATION- DERNI, DISTRICT- SARAN. … PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE SECRETARY, PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PANCHAYATI RAJ, DEPARTMENT, SARAN DIVISION, CHAPRA. 4. THE DISTRIT PROGRAMME RURAL OFFICER, SARAN. 5. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, SONEPUR, DISTRICT- SARAN. 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, DIGHWARA, DISTRICT- SARAN. 7. NODAL OFFICER, DISTRICT- SARAN. 8. DIPAK KUMAR, SARPANCH OF TRILOK CHAK KACHEHARI, POST OFFICE- SHITALPUR, POLICE STATION- DIGHWARA, DISTRICT- SARAN. 9. VIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH, UP SARPANCHY OF TRILOK CHAK KACHEHARI, POST OFFICE- SHITALPUR, POLICE STATION- DIGHWARA, DISTRICT- SARAN. .. RESPONDENTS. For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajay Kr. Singh, No.-1, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, AC to GP NO.4. ----------- 3. 12.05.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dues of the petitioner have been paid only after the writ application was filed. He submits that money was withdrawn and kept by Up-Surpanch illegally with him and was not paid to him without any reason. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that for this misconduct a proceeding has already been ordered to be initiated for removal of the Punch and Surpanch, which is evident from Annexure-4. The proceeding, if initiated, has to come to a logical end in accordance with law. However, since the grievances of the 2 petitioner raised in this application stands redressed, the writ application is disposed of as infructuous. Ibrar/- ( J. N. Singh, J. )