Crl.M.No.9619 of 2010 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No.9619 of 2010 Date of Decision: 29.7.2010 Harvinder Kaur and another ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab for for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 to 6. JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) Petitioners, who claim themselves to be major and having performed their marriage on 26.3.2010 against the wishes of respondent Nos.4 to 6 (family members of wife-petitioner No.1) seek protection apprehending threat to their life and liberty. Notice of motion was issued vide order dated 31.3.2010 for 24.5.2010. On 24.5.2010, none for the petitioners had appeared and the same is the position today. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 6 points out that after the alleged marriage on 26.3.2010, petitioner No.1-Harvinder Kaur had returned to the custody of her parents/family members. Subsequently, petitioner No.2 filed a habeas corpus petition bearing Crl.W.P.No.610 of Crl.M.No.9619 of 2010 #2# 2009 against the family members of the wife, wherein Harvinder Kaur- petitioner No.1 was produced in court on 19.4.2010 and she made a statement that petitioner No.2-Jajwinder Singh had forcibly solemnized the marriage. She further stated that she wanted to stay with her parents and did not wish to live with petitioner No.2. Accordingly, this court vide order dated 19.4.2010 permitted petitioner No.1-wife to go with the parents while disposing of the petition. In view of the developments pointed out by learned counsel for the respondents, the grievance of the petitioners no longer subsists. Dismissed as having become infructuous. July 29, 2010 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE