IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10393 of 2011 Deomuni Yadav, son of Sukhari Yadav, resident of village-Bakhaura, P.S. Rohtas, District-Rohtas. --------- Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ----- Opposite Party. ----------- 03. 05.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 304 (B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that during investigation it transpires that the deceased on criticism consumed poison. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of District & Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Rohtas P.S. Case no. 80/2010 and S.Tr. no. 472/10, subject to the following conditions:- (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailer shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates 2 and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Kamlesh (Anjana Prakash, J.)