THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.840 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner filed W.P.No.6765 of 2009 for declaration that the action of respondents 1 and 2 therein in not initiating action against respondents 3 and 4, on the complaint submitted by her, on 21.04.2008, is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. Ancillary reliefs were also claimed. While issuing notice before admission, on 01.04.2009, this Court passed an interim order, directing that respondents 1 and 2 shall verify whether the plot, owned by the petitioner, is encroached, or taken away by respondents 3 and 4 and they shall ensure that no construction takes place, over it, without specific permission of the authorities concerned. This Contempt Case is filed alleging that respondents 3 and 4 have commenced the construction, in violation of the interim order. Respondents 1, 2 and 3 filed separate counter-affidavits. The 2nd respondent stated that he visited the site, on a complaint received by the petitioner, and there, he saw a board put by revenue authorities to the effect that ‘No construction shall be made over it’. Respondent No.3 states that he did not participate in any construction. The 4th respondent states that steps were taken for undertaking construction and applications were submitted for permission, and since the permission was not accorded, no construction has been made. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner had enclosed photographs, which depict that the foundation and basement was constructed to certain extent. While the petitioner asserts that the construction was made subsequent to the orders of this Court, learned counsel for the 4th respondent submits that it was existing before the orders were passed. A categorical undertaking is given on behalf of respondents 3 and 4 that they would not make any construction, unless and until specific permission is accorded by the concerned authorities and the civil dispute is resolved. Taking the same on record, the Contempt Case is closed. Respondents 1 and 2 are directed to ensure that no construction takes place, on the land in question, except on the basis of specific permission accorded by the concerned authorities. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dated:10.09.2009 GJ