IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5608 of 2009 1. RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA Son of Sri Ram Binod Mishra, resident of Village Mala PO Gurukul Mehian PS Moffasil,District Saran 2. Prayag Kumar Prasad 3. Mukesh Kumar 4. Kundan Kumar 5. Santosh Kumar Tiwary 6. Dileep Kumar 7. Akhilesh Kumar Bharati 8. Amardeep Kumar 9. Rajeeb Pratap Singh 10. Ranjeet Kumar Tiwary 11. Sunil Kumar Gupta 12. Chandan Kumar singh 13. Manoj Singh 14. Brajesh Kumar 15. Raj Nandan Prasad 16. Mrityunjay Kumar 17. Shambhu Manjhi 18. Mani Kumar Roy 19. Manoj Kumar Ram 20. Suresh Prasad 21. Ratanlal Mahto 22. Ravindra Ray 23. Ravindra Kumar Mahto 24. Virendra Kumar Yadav 25. Manoj Kumar 26. Rajesh Chandra ……..Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna 2. Home Commissioner Bihar, Patna 3. Director General cum Inspector General of Police Bihar, Patna 4. D I G (Human Rights) Bihar Patna 5. S P Saran, Chapra 6. S P, Siwan 7. S P, Bhagalpur 8. Chairman, Kendriya Chayan Parisad –cum- IG, BMP, Bihar Patna …….Respondents ----------- 02- 4.5.2009 Heard Mr.Ebrahim Kabir for the petitioners, and Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, learned Government Advocate No.II. The petitioners seek a direction to the respondent authorities to appoint them as Constables - 2 - in the Bihar Police Force as per their merit reflected in the merit list. The respondent authorities issued Advertisement nos. 1/2009 and 2/2009, inviting applications for appointment of Constables to the Bihar Police Force. The petitioners appear to be applicants and reached the final stage of the selection process. The select list was prepared in which the petitioners claim to have found their way, notwithstanding which they have not been appointed although vacancies are still available, and fresh advertisements have been made. It appears on a perusal of the writ petition that the petitioners have not been able to lay the requisite factual foundation to make out a prima facie case. The writ petition does not state as to the number of vacancies which were intended to be filled up by the two advertisements, their position in the merit list, the number of posts actually filled up, and the position of the last selected candidate. In that view of the matter, we do not wish to proceed further in the matter. 3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. ( S K Katriar ) mrl