WP(C) 4530/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Ms. P. Barman, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. B. Goswami, lea rned counsel, for the respondent No.2. Also heard Mr. G. Soren, learned Govt. Ad vocate, for the State respondents. The grievance raised in this writ petition is in respect of alleged disturbance being caused by respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4 in the peaceful possession of the plot of land measuring 1(one) bigha covered by dag No.230 in No.3 Kisamat of Hojai T own. According to the petitioner, his father occupied the said plot of land and the petitioner stepped into his shoes in the year 1984. It is the grievance of t he petitioner that the aforesaid respondents without any legal sanction are tryi ng to dispossess the petitioner from the aforesaid plot of land. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the materials on record, I dispose of this writ petition at the motion stage itself providing that the respondents, more particularly, the respondents Nos.2, 3 and 4, shall not do anything, which is contrary to law, for eviction of the petitioner from t he aforesaid plot of land. If the petitioner is in unauthorized occupation of th e said plot of land, recourse may be had to the specific provisions of law for h is eviction. However, without following the procedure laid down under the law, t he petitioner shall not be evicted by applying the extra-judicial method or forc e.