H^?.-'""^... <<?^^"" >'^\'^}" ^^.- iN THE HIGH COURT QF CHHAmSGARHAT BILASPUR w.p, ccr. N^, ^^ /2010 PETITONER VERSUS RESPONDNET Ramkumar aged about 40years, S/o- Vipin Bihari Sao, R/o- Chhote- Atarmuda, Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTJTUTION OF INDIA. 5r n" r\r. TUEJSEIIUQMPB' 1L^^ Ba—i A;?^'^ x^: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETmON (C) No. 5 175 of201Q Rajkumar. RESPONDENTS VERSUS Regional Transport Authority, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETmON LTNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Aemhotri. J^ Present: Sfari Shailendra Bajpai, Advoeate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Paael Lawyer for fhe State/respondent. ORDER CORAL) (Passed on 09th day of September, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the application dated 23.04.2010 (Aimexure P/l) filed by fhe petitioner is pending consideration before the respondent authority and ever sinee, no action has been taken on the said application. 2. Shri Thakur, leamed Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondent subinits that the pending application of the petitioner would be considered and decided ui accordance wifh law on its own merits and •f perspective, within a period ofsix weeks from fhe date ofreceiptofa copy ofttus order. 3. In view ofthe foregoing, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. ____———~~~~^~- \ SatishK.Agrihotri