IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 3151 of 2009 Between: Md. Saleem, S/o Md. Mastan, R/o H.No.9-3-120/121, Old Club Road, Opp: Bommana Show Room, Near RTC Bus Stand, Khammam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of A.P., Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 2 Tanneeru Kotaiah, S/o Ratnaiah, R/o Chinthagurthi Village, Khammam Dist. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased toto quash the proceedings in Crl.M.P.No.2908 of 2008 in C.C.No. 475 of 2005, dated 04.02.09 on the file of the learned Judl. First Class Magistrate (Spl. Mobile Court), Khammam. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY Crl.P.No. 3151 of 2009 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri P. Prabhakar Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. The petition for sending the document for expert opinion is filed after the arguments on the second respondent side is completed. That being the case, obviously, the petition is filed with an oblique motive of delaying the disposal of the case. In such view of the matter, I do not find any merit in the petition and accordingly, the petition is dismissed. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. November 6, 2009. *BVS