-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3645 OF 2005 IN CRI.APPEAL NO. 513 OF 2005 1. Ratan Lahanu Mahale 2. Ganpat Lahanu Mahale ..Applicants Vs. State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ... Mrs.S.A.Dhamale Advocate for Applicants Mr. S.R.Shinde, A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JUNE 30,2005 DATE : JUNE 30,2005 DATE : JUNE 30,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants have been convicted under Section 324 r.w. 34 of IPC and sentenced to R.I. for one year. The applicants were on bail during the trial. They have not misused the liberty -2- granted to them and sentence imposed on them is only one year. The appeal filed by the applicants is not likely to be heard within one year. Hence, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicants. 3. Both the applicants be released on bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each with one or two sureties to make up that amount. They will report on first Sunday of every month to Surgana Police Station till the appeal is decided. 4. Application is disposed of. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]