IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1151 of 2010 (S/S) Koshik Banola ……Petitioner. Versus State and others. …….Respondents Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Dinesh Gahatori, Brief Holder for the State. Dated:-13-12-2010 Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought following reliefs:- “I) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 11.11.2010 (annexure No. 4 to the writ petition) passed by respondent No. 2 for suspending the services of petitioner. II) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner on his original post as Lower Division Assistant at Tehsil Salt, District Almora and pay regular salary to the petitioner with arrears. III) Issue any other or further writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 2 IV) To award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner.” During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner made a prayer that this writ petition may be disposed of directing the respondent No. 2 to conclude the enquiry initiated against the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. Prayer made is innocuous in nature. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No. 2 to conclude the enquiry, initiated against the petitioner, preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. (B.S.Verma, J.) 13-12-2010 S