IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 3972 of 2008. Decided on: 29th September, 2010. Joginder Singh Chauhan. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate vice Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Advocate. For respondent No. 1. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Respondents No. 2 to 6 are exparte. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. D.P. Gupta, learned vice counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that in view of the averments contained in the reply, there is no merit in this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge September 29, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?