1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRI. APPLICATION NO. 3301 OF 2008 (CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT & FINANCE CO.LTD. VS. STATE OF MAH. THR.PSO CHANDRAPUR) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Ms. A. Jambhulkar, Advocate for applicant. Shri O.D.Kakde, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : APRIL 03, 2009. 1. By this application the applicant Finance Company challenges order passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hinganghat whereby the learned Magistrate allowed the Finance Company to take custody of the vehicle seized on executing a bond of Rs. One Lac with solvent surety in the like amount, with the condition that the vehicle will not be disposed of and shall be maintained in the same condition and shall be produced before the Court whenever asked for. 2. The vehicle is seized in altogether different crime. 2 3. In view of this, no fault can be found with the order passed by the learned Magistrate. The application is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE LATER ON : Instead of solvent surety, the applicant would be at liberty to furnish bank guarantee. With this clarification the application is disposed of. JUDGE RR.