IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 6906 of 1996 Between: Chandupatla Ram Reddy, S/o. Venkat Reddy, M.L.A., Manthini, Karimnagar dt. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd., rep. by its General Manager, O.C.P.II, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar Dt. 2 Officer-in -charge, O.C.P.II, Singareni Collieries, Near Ladnapur, Singareni Collieries Co.Ltd., 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli, Karimnagar Dt. 4 The Land Acquisition Officer/Spl. Dy. Collector, Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd., Godavarikhani, Karimnagar Dt. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, i) declaring the action of the respondents in carrying out blasting operations under OPC-II and not passing the award/paying the compensation for the houses/structures/cattle sheds existing in Sy. Nos.286, 287, 288, 297, 296, 298, 300, 302, 303, 304, 335, 337, 341, 342, 14 to 16, 28, 29, 31, 32, 37, 221 to 225, 227 to 230, 234, 336 and 338 as arbitrary, illegal and unreasonable; ii) a direction may be issued to the respondents to complete the acquisition proceedings and payment of compensation for the houses/structures/cattle sheds existing in Sy. Nos.286, 287, 288, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 302, 303, 304, 335, 337, 341, 342, 14 to 16, 28, 29, 31, 32, 37, 221 to 225, 227 to 230, 234, 336 and 338 of Ladnapur Village; iii) costs be awarded to the petitioner; Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. K.RAMKRISHNA REDDI ( Not present) Counsel for Respondents 1 and 2: MR. K.SRINIVASA MURTHY (STANDING COUNSEL FOR SINGARENI COLLORIES) Counsel for Respondents 3 and 4: GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following: ORDER: This matter was listed for hearing on 07-02-2005. As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, it is listed today “for dismissal.” Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. ____________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 08th February, 2005. Ak ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. The General Manager, Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd., O.C.P.II, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District. 2. The Officer-in-charge, O.C.P.II, Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd., near Ladnapur. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District. 4. The Land Acquisition Officer/ Special Deputy Collector, Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd., Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District. 5. Two CCs to the Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (O.U.T). 6. Two CD copies.