IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 14TH JULY 2011 / 23RD ASHADHA 1933 OP (FC).No. 2243 of 2011(R) --------------------------- OP.1478/2008 of FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN O.P.NO.1478/2008 -------------------------------------------------------------------- K.JOSE, S/O.KOLLAPPAN, AGED 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT VAZHAVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, THAMALAM, POOJAPPURA.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.SREEKANTH S.NAIR RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS IN O.P.NO.1478/2008 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. C.S.PUSHPA BINDHU, AGED 30 YEARS, D/O.CHERUPUSHPAM, RESIDING AT THEKKUMKARA PUTHEN VEEDU, KOTTAKONAM, KATTACHAL KUZHY.P.O., BALARAMAPURAM. 2. DHANJITH MOHAN, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.K.N.CHANDRAMOHAN, RESIDING AT THEKKUMKARA PUTHEN VEEDU, KOTTAKONAM, KATTACHAL KUZHY.P.O., BALARAMAPURAM. THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: dmb OP (FC).No. 2243 of 2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 26.6.2008 IN W.P(C)NO.11359/2008 EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE COPY OF THE PETITION IN O.P.NO.1478/2008 EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE I.A. DATED 7.3.2011 FOR AMENDMENT EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE I.A.NO.473/2011 DTD 7.3.2011 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE dmb THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------------ O.P.(F C) No.2243 of 2011 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of July 2011 J U D G M E N T Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. We have heard learned counsel for petitioner. We do not find that there is anything worth in this matter to extend an invitation to the respondents, that too under notice of this Court, to answer the petitioner's request for a direction to the Family Court to consider the application filed by him to amend the pleadings in the original petition. We are told that the petitioner has filed an application requesting the Family Court to advance the case and consider the application for amendment. We think that it would have been only owing to the pressure of work that the Family Court has not taken up the application for amendment. We are sure that it would be done shortly. We therefore, direct the petitioner to place a copy O.P.(F C) No.2243 of 2011 -: 2 :- of this judgment before the Family Court. The learned Judge will sympathetically consider the petitioner's request for early disposal of the application for amendment of pleadings. This O.P.(F.C.) is ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Jvt