IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37690 of 2010 MANOJ KUMAR SHAW @ MANOJ SHAW Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 26.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Admittedly, petitioner is the husband of the informant and the informant have two children aged about 8 years and 5 years out of the aforesaid wedlock. The grievance of the informant is that petitioner went to Kolkata alongwith her two children leaving her at her matrimonial home where her parents-in-law used to torture her in both ways, mentally and physically, on account of non-fulfilment of illegal demand . Learned counsel for the petitioner drew my attention towards this fact that the informant in the year 2008 fled away with one Sanjeev Kumar Gupta and subsequently she solemnized her marriage with the aforesaid Sanjeev Kumar Gupta. He also drew my attention towards this that the father of the informant had given informatory petition at Krishnagarh P.S. on 09.05.2008, mentioning all the aforesaid facts and on the same date, the petitioner had also filed an informatory petition to the above stated police station in respect of the above stated fact. He also points out that informant is in habit of filing false cases against the petitioner and his other family members. To fortify the aforesaid contention he drew my attention towards Annexure-3 series i.e. Photostat copies of the Complaint Case No. 304 C of 2010 and 312 C of 2010. 2 On the other hand, learned counsel for the informant refuted all the above stated submissions and argued that neither informat eloped with above stated Sanjeev Kumar Gupta nor her father given any informatory petition to concerned Police Station and, as a matter of fact, the aforesaid so-called informatory petition is a forged document. He also denied the filing of complaint petition i.e. Complaint Case No. 304 C of 2010 and 312 C of 2010 and submits that the aforesaid complaint cases do not contain the signature of the informant. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, in my view, it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, petitioner, namely, Manoj Kumar Shaw @ Manoj Shaw, in the event of his arrest/surrender within thirty days from the date of communication of this order to the concerned court in connection with Ara (Nawada) P.S. Case No. 74 of 2010, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Bhojpur at Ara subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)