1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION NO. 7704 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1325 OF 1991 Gurunanak Industries ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. D.V. Soman, advocate for the petitioner Mr. V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for respondent-state ..... CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATED: 12TH JANUARY, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 Heard counsel for the parties. According to the petitioner, the manufacturing activity is carried out by the petitioner in “D” Zone and only administrative office of the petitioner is situated in “B” Zone, for which reason the petitioner would nevertheless be entitled for eligibility certificate for a period of nine years. In the first place, this specific argument was not canvassed when the writ petition was heard and decided on 17.8.2002. Secondly, the reason recorded in para 5 would 2 nevertheless disentitle the petitioner for any relief. For that reason, in our opinion, there is no case to disturb the opinion recorded in para 5 of the order dated 17.8.2002. In the circumstances, no case for review is made out. Review petition is dismissed. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) (A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.) rlj/