Q Q a“ II Tn HGE COURT OF CEATTIBG‘RH AT mASPUR w.P.No. l+é4j2oo4 : l. State ofChhatu'sgarh, Through Seastary, Departmant D ‘ Raipux(c.e.). ‘ fgww 2. District Forest omcer, I ‘ Forest Dmsmn Bilaspur (C.G.). ig’ Qws f, 3. Range omcer, Khudia Forest Range, Tahsil— Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). WT PETITION ‘U’IDEI ARTICLE 225/122/Ol‘ T$ GOISTITUIOI’ OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A 8mm WRIT. 03pm 03 DQEQTIQH TO DO JUSTICE £§ TE mm. ‘ ‘; V9} g Nanhelal Bani@ Nanhelal Gupta, S]o Shri Shyamlal Bani, Aged about 56 years, Occupaiium Service, Presently véormg as Furest Guard, posted at Saxgadhi, Khudin £3 Forest Range, Tahsil— Immi, .‘i'g‘g" q by ‘ j District. Bilaspur (ca) ~Versus —- XI-HC-22 3mm m \ Em mmvvmmmw 2m mam WW mmm WW WW $Wm 2’7.Q§.QQ04 Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, cou Shri Yashwant Singh Thakul Heard‘ The petitioner has prefema 2‘26f‘2’27 of the Constitution of i’ dated 24.02.2004 (Annexure PJ Of&:€r, Bilaspur (raspondsnt No.2 The caso of m6 pctitioner 1's 1'11 the Forest Department of the Kotwari regis‘ter the petitioner’s d9; service record it hae been record< school leaving certificate \submitted by his mother in which the Principal on his own hadyxrecoxtied When the petitioner came to kno from the Kotwari regisier he respondente 1'11 the year 2001 but representation of the petitioner am retire the petitioner on 31.05.2004E Learned counsel for the etitioner argued that since the respondents are not rleciciing th: representation of the petitioner, e allowed to make a detailed ments to respondent No.2 and §reSpondent No.2 be directed to idecide the representation of the asel for the petitioner. ‘, Govt. Advocate for the State. i this writ petition under Article ndia being aggrieved by the order P) passed by the Dietrict Forest I'. that he is working as Forest Guard State of Chhattisgarh and as per ;e of birth is; 22.02. 1948 but in his. ad as 12.05.1944 on the basis of fhe date of bkth of the petitioner. w about his correct daie of birth immediately repreeenteci to the. no decision has been taken on the L now the reepondente are going to therefore, the petitioner may representation along with the do {petitioner Within a period of thirty clays to which leaned State counsel has no objection. I l l XI-HC-22 WW WW W®W $Wm Vz}—' Having heard the learned 'bamsel for the parties and having mgard to the facts and cimummances of the case, the yetitioner i5 alIOWEd to mak€ a detajlad rapr6q£nta1ion within a paried 0f 10 days from today to respondEnt No.2‘ and m nun respondent No.2 is directed to docide the mpresenta '011 of the petitioner withm a period of thirty days from the date of re eipt of the same considering all the pointe raised by the petitioner d the documents, in an objective manner with a reasoned order in c'cordance with law, With the aforesaid directiOI L the petition stands disposed at Consequendy, M.W.P. No. 1Jf01/2004 65 LA. Nos. 3337/2004 85 3338/ 2004 aleo stand disposed of. Certified copy as per Rules. i Sd/— L.C.BHADOG v a Judge