•^c^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION NO.Z5^240F 2004 PETITIONERS 1. •\ ^ v ^ ^i^\ .-•...••'^^b' ^•'^ ^ \<t y: ^ RESPONDENTS ^^^^ ^ "} /Tr^^llT1' ^i'^ ^i€<r^^ .JS;^^'1 °;-'1^;'-""" Ram Naresh Tiwari, S/0 Raghunath_ Prasad Tiwari, Aged about 39 years, Presently posted as Constable No.585 (Old No.ll 53), Thana Gola Palli, District South Bastar, Dantewada (C.G.). Pushparaj Singh Parihar, S/0 Sliri B.S. Parihar, Aged about 30 years, Presently posted as Constable No.741 (Old No.912) Police Station City Kofwali, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). Kanwal Jeet Siugh Yadav, S/0 Kaliiram Yadav, Aged about 32 years, Presently posted as Constable No.340 (Old No. 1125) Police Station Gaagalur, Police District Bijapur (C.G.). Versus 1. Unionoflndia Through the Secretary, Department of Personnel, Public Grievance aiid Pension, Third Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi. 2. State ofMadhya Pradesh Through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.). 3. StateofChliattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. DirectorGeneralofPolice, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.). 5. Inspector General of Police (Personnel), Police Head Quarters, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 6. SupermtendeatofPolice, District South Bastar, Dantewada 7. SuperintendentofPolice, District Rajnandgafen (C.G.). 8. Superintendent ofPolice, DistrictBijapur(C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS. As shown in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENT^, As shown in the cause title. 3. PARTICULARS OF THE ORDER AGAINST WHICH THE PETITION IS MADE & SUBJECT MATTER IN BRIEF:- ^' ii: II 3a-HC'-22 affl^f^f ^,^ R-tt'* 3I^!H '^?^ ?ti*lie(»^fE^l! 14-- ^•ai .•<ti<tey2S3Nt!lgf'fewy . t3ni?r;'qa^7^:. :•:'",' . .W<&.tSO' 2S^-/£^o4- A *lf«?tlS»»1iq> 3tl4<t 4'W:IW<it®a Shri SameerBehar. Advocate Shri Vinay Harit, Sr. Standing Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Chhattisgarh. .'; ADptication for uraent hearing Counsel fix the petitioners su W.P. No. 578/04 (BalendraSekhar (or the petitioners. • [Counsel fortlie Union oflndia. tldvocate General for the State of lis allowed. sulbrmtted'that in siinilar matter bearing Wshra & Others ¥s.Unien oflndia <£ Others), orders ftave beea passe4 passed in this case also. Prayer is not opposed by the otj Having considered fhe facfs a| on record and in view of fhe judgn| position, the action ofthe'State Autl) cannot be sustaiMed and the petitioner| Accordmgly, the petition is al] relieve the petitioners withiii 15 days] this order. i ; Consequently, .M.W.P. No. ; standdisposed of ,{ . Certified copyhas per mles, sh^lo'l^iln' ^W^i'^^'-c^^i^l^ ^Rai&iNiaaSsi .He prays that similar order may be lierside. ' |id cu-cumstances offhe case, material ient cited above aiid further tKe legal |orities ia not relievitig .the petitioners 1 are entitled lor relievmg. |bwed. The respond'eats are directed to |!rom:fhe dafe ofproduetionof|copyof, 1236/2004 & I.A.No.5655/2004 also Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge