Vff • 1EJF^h1h»?' S S^.^SS&'SLfEi B?HKi tJUB'S'i.l^ilf yKfl'l'iItS'&fii.K L W.P. (227) N0. 2324/2008 Chitrekha Bai, Wife ofThakur Rain Sahu, aged about 45 years, resident of viflage Jiinwani, Post Sakarra, P.H.No.39, Tah. Gunderdehi, Distt. Dm^ (CG) Tbe Chainnan, Board of Reveaue, Chliattisgarh, Bflaspur Circuit Court at Raipur (CG) Additional Raipur (CG) Couunissioner, 3. Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.) Tah. Paatan, Distt. Durg (CG) 4. Naib TahsUdar, Tali. Gmiderdehi, Distt. Durg (CG) 5. Bhushan Lal Son of Kodu Ram 6. Khoialal, Son of Khodu Ram 7. Heaian Lal Son of Khodu Ram Resp. No. 5 to 7 are the r/o. Junwani, PHN. No. 39, Tali. Gunderdehi, Distt. Dm^ $CG) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 227 OF THE CONSTITUTiON OF I3SDIA Shri N.S.Dburaader, counsel for fue petitioner. Challenge ia fhe present writ petition. is to the order 10.07.2007 (Aimexure P/l) passed by the Board of TT .,.«*15iG-»> 'fl^^ 'i •¥ Revenue ia Revenue Case No. RN/05/R/A-6/744/2006, whereby it confirmed fhe order dated 6.6.2000 passed by Additional Commissioner, Raipur in Revenue Case No. 324/A-6/1994-95. The Additional Commissioner had coafimied fhe order of the Sub Divisional Officer dated 30.05.95 whereas the Sub Divisional of&cer has confirmed fhe order dated 30.06.94 passed by the Tahsfldar. I have heard couiisel for the petinoner. Apart from. fhe fact fhat fhere is ao inerit in. the case, there is coucurreat findinR of the Revenue authorities below and fherefore, this Court is decluied to iaterfere ia the present writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aad the relief as clauaed. can not be yaiited to fh.e petitioner. The petition beiug devoid of any substance, is dismissed at the niotion stage itsetf. ^^-—" _^^ ^^