IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-15021 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 13, 2010 Titu @ Sandeep ........Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Narender Sura, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satyavir Singh Yadav, DAG, Haryana. SABINA, J. Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.197 dated 18.6.2009, under Sections 302,307/34,148,149,212,404,120-B of Indian Penal Code (in short 'IPC') & 25 of Arms Act, 1959, Police Station Sampla, District- Rohtak. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 8.9.2009. The name of the petitioner did not figure in the FIR but cropped up during investigation. Charge has been framed against the petitioner under Section 212 IPC. Learned State counsel, who is assisted by ASI Satpal Singh, has opposed the petition but has not controverted the fact that charge has been framed against the petitioner under Section 212 IPC. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case this petition is allowed. Petitioner be admitted to bail subject to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtak. (SABINA) July 13, 2010 JUDGE Anand