[ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2124 OF 2008 New Hari Om SRA CHS Ltd. ... Petitioners. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents. WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2213 OF 2008 M/s. Hari Om Developers ... Petitioners Vs. Slum Rehibilitation Autority and Ors. ... Respondents. Mr. Vijay Thorat Senior Counsel alongwith S.D.Patil for the petitioner in WP 2124/08. Mr. S.G.Surana alongwith C.N.Gole for the petitioner in WP(L) No. 2243/08. Mr. Ravi Kadam Advocate General alongwith G.D.Utangale i/b. Utangale & Co. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in WP No. 2124/08. Mr. Ravi Kadam Advocate general alongwith Government Pelader Mr. D.A.Nalavade and R.J.Mane AGP for respondent NO. 3 in WP 2124 of 2008. Mr. Ravi Kadam Advocate General alongwith D.A.Nalavade GP and Pradeep Jadhav AGP for respondentNO.1 in WP(L) No.2243/08. Mr. A.R.Pande intervenor in WP No. 2124/08. CORAM CORAM CORAM : P.B.Majmudar and : P.B.Majmudar and : P.B.Majmudar and A.A.Sayed, A.A.Sayed, A.A.Sayed, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : September 25, 2008. : September 25, 2008. : September 25, 2008. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel on both sides. 2. The learned Advocate General has submitted that the Stay Order granted earlier has now been vacated and the decision taken by the State Government is communicated to the Chief Executive Officer, SRA, [ 2 ] Mumbai vide letter dated 25.9.2008 under signature of A.K.Jagtap, Deputy Secretary, Government of Maharashtra. He has produced the said letter on record. It is taken on record and marked ’X’ for identification. 3. Mr. Pandey, the learned Counsel appearing for the intervenor has submitted that the intervenor is the affected person in respect of the vacation of the injunction order. If the intervenor has any grievance with the said decision taken by the State Government, he is at liberty to take out appropriate proceedings challenging the same in accordance with law. 4. Since the stay in question is vacated, nothing survives in these petitions and the petitions are required to be disposed of. 5. Subject to what is stated above both the petitions are disposed of. [P.B.Majmudar, [P.B.Majmudar, [P.B.Majmudar, J.] J.] J.] [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, J.] J.] J.]