IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15985 of 2010 RANJAY KUMAR @ TULLU, S/o Chandra Kishore Singh. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 17.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 366, 366A and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The submission is that the petitioner had moved for anticipatory bail before this Court which was rejected on 19.12.2005 and thereafter once again on 27.10.2009 against that order the petitioner went before the Hon’ble Supreme Court but the anticipatory bail was rejected. The further submission is that during investigation a number of witnesses have stated that in fact it was not a case of kidnapping but there was love affairs between the parties. The third submission is that subsequently the matter has been compromised between the parties which is apparent from Annexure-3. In view of such, let the petitioner, above named who is in custody since 06.04.2010 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with S.Tr. No. 192 of 2010 arising out of Muzaffarpur 2 Sadar P.S. Case No. 149 of 2005 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. The court below before releasing the petitioner on bail will notice the informant and satisfy himself that in fact the matter has been compromised between the parties. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)