IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.877 of 2010 (S/S) Kailash Chandra Papnoi & another ………..Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …….Respondents Shri S.S. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri Vinay Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondents. Dated: 6th October, 2010 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners for a direction to the respondents to give them appointment on Class III post as they fulfill the required qualification for Class III post. 3. Both the petitioners were appointed on Class IV post under Dying-in-Harness Rules. They accepted the appointment. Thereafter, they moved an application for giving them appointment on Class III post. The learned counsel for the petitioners confined his prayer that the representation submitted by the petitioners may be decided by the respondent no.2 at the earliest. The learned Standing Counsel for the State, Shri Vinay Kumar, states that the respondents have no objection, in case such direction is issued. 2 4. In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of the order. 5. Interim Relief application no.8166 of 2010 and Urgency application no.3796 of 2010 also stands disposed of. (V.K. Bist, J.) Arpan 06.10.2010