-1- Civil Revision No.173 of 2011 (O&M). IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Date of Decision: January 12, 2011. Civil Revision No.173 of 2011 (O&M). Jarnail Singh ... Petitioner VERSUS Jatinder Singh ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL. 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- MOHINDER PAL, J. The challenge in the present revision petition is to the orders passed by both the Courts below whereby the application filed by the plaintiff-petitioner Jarnail Singh along with his co- plaintiffs under Section 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure in a suit filed by them for possession -2- Civil Revision No.173 of 2011 (O&M). in respect of the land in dispute was dismissed. The defendants-respondents have purchased the suit property for valuable consideration. A separate suit, whereby the sale deeds in favour of the defendants-respondents have been challenged, is pending. In the present suit, the plaintiff- petitioner along with his co-plaintiffs (non-petitioners) are seeking possession of the land in dispute. As such, balance of convenience does not lie in favour of the plaintiffs. In case any alienation in respect of the suit property is made by the defendants-respondents, that will hit by the rule of lis pendens. Under the circumstances, no irreparable loss is going to be caused to the plaintiffs in case no stay is granted whereas it would cause hardship to the defendants-respondents, who are purchasers of the suit land for consideration. Resultantly, I do not see any ground which may warrant interference by this Court in the impugned orders passed by both the Courts below. This revision is, accordingly, hereby dismissed being without any merit. ( MOHINDER PAL ) January 12, 2011. JUDGE ak