IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10234 of 2007 1. DAROGA YADAV @ DAROGA RAI 2. GIRIJA PRASAD YADAV 3. JAGDISH YADASV 4. MAHENDRA YADAV VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,PATNA 3. THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, PALIGANJ POLICE STATION , PATNA 4. THE S.D.O., PALIGANJ 5. THE BIHAR HINDU RELIGIOUS STRUST BOARD THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (C.E.O.), PATNA & 6. SRI SURESH KASHYAP @ SURESH KUMAR ----------- 10 07.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, respondent no.5. No one represents for respondent no.6 in spite of valid service of notice. Petitioners have prayed for direction commanding respondents to put them in possession over land mentioned in para 3 of the writ petition as they are genuine land holder having valid right, title and interest over the same. The petitioners submit that they purchased the land by registered sale deed in the year 1980s. They have annexed the revisional survey Khatiyan contained in annexure 3 series as well as rent receipt contained in annexure 4 series in support of their case. They are aggrieved by action of respondent numbers 5 and 6. A counter affidavit has been filed by respondent no.5, the Superintendent (officiating), Bihar State Board of Religious Trusts, Bihar stating therein that Paliganj Math situated in Patna district is a public religious trust, registered under Bihar State Board of Religious Trusts under section 34 of the Bihar Hindu Religious Trusts Act, 1950 vide Registration No. 297. However, order of the - 2 - Registrar of the Trust is not mentioned . It is also stated that on 13.3.2007 for better administration and management of the Trust property a Committee was formed and a scheme was settled by the Board under section 32 of the Act and the Notification was published as per law in the official gazette dated 26.3.2007. It has further been stated that neither any action of the Board nor any of its order has been challenged. It is stated that respondent no. 6 has been made secretary of the Committee and there are allegations in the writ petition against this respondent no.6, who may be a private respondent. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, this Court observes that petitioners should first file representation before respondent no. 5 who would examine their grievances and dispose of the same within two months from the date of receipt of representation. The writ petition stands disposed of with aforesaid directions. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)