1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3420 of 2009 PRABHA SHANKAR PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 23.3.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ application is purely a money claim. Counsel for the petitioner, however, would submit that he has been subjected to harassment because he has earlier moved this Court against a decision of cancelling his contract. This Court normally would not entertain a writ application for payment of contractor’s bill, inasmuch as they travel in the realm of contract but then if the petitioner’s any admitted amount is kept unpaid only because he had moved this Court challenging the earlier order that is wholly unfair. That being so, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the grievance of the petitioner and look into specific aspect as alleged in paragraph no.9 of the writ application. 2 This application, accordingly, stands disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/