IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19463 of 2010 JITENDRA YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 8.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that initially misbehave and snatching of money including gold ear-ring from purse was alleged. Later on section 376 IPC was added. But none of the offences was found true after investigation. There was enmity in between both the families. Petitioner was a witness in a case filed against complainant’s son for the offence under the Arms Act. After submission of final form protest cum complaint is filed and the petitioner is apprehending his arrest, never can be justified at the moment. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- 2 (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa (Nalanda) in Complaint Case No. 675 C of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)