IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15073 of 2010 BINOD KUMAR YADAV son of Rup Narayan Prasad Yadav, resident of village Dahediya, Police Station Nagar Itari, District Gadhawa (Jharkhand), …Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR … OPPOSITE PARTY For the Petitioner: Mr. B.J. Ojha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manish Kumar, APP …. 3 07.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under sections 402, 467, 468, 469 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the allegation set up in the first information report, it is alleged that by some advertisement made in the newspaper, unemployed boys/girls have been allured on ground of providing job. When the premises of the company was raided, no document regarding its registration could be provided and, some receipts showing payment of Rs. 500/- each were also recovered. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in fact, the Company, namely, “Imagine Co. Pvt. Ltd.” was duly registered, however, it is also submitted that the petitioner is merely an employee of the aforesaid - 2 - company. The amount has been charged in connection with some tuition fee. It is also submitted that not a single person of the locality made any sort of complaint regarding the alleged cheating. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 16.12.2009 and it has been stated that he is not having any criminal antecedent. Further contention is that co- accused Brajesh Kumar Singh has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.04.2010 in Cr. Misc. No. 10547 of 2010. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the abovenamed petitioner, BINOD KUMAR YADAV, to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in Buxar(Town) Police Station Case No. 343/09 with further condition that one of the bailors must be the father of the petitioner. Further, after his release, if the petitioner is again found involved in similar kind of offences, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. SC (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)