Crl.Misc. No.M-33744 of 2010 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc. No.M-33744 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision 28.07.2011 Sanjay alias Sannu and others Petitioners versus State of Haryana Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Ram Pal Verma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sagar Deswal, AAG,Haryana. *** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, “Cr.P.C.”) in case registered vide FIR No. 48 dated 10.2.2009 under Sections 395, 397 IPC at Police Station Kundli, District Sonepat. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioners have further pointed out that the offence punishable under Section 379 IPC was converted into an offence under Sections 395 and 397 IPC. However, as per the prosecution, there are some more cases registered against the petitioner. The details of the cases are as under:- (i)Case No. 70/09 under Sections 394, 302, 201 I.P.C. Police Station Shimbhawali. Crl.Misc. No.M-33744 of 2010 (O&M) 2 (ii)Case Crime No. 183 of 2009 under Sections 379, 328 IPC,Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Bulandshahar. (iii) Case Crime No. 25 of 2009, under Sections 395, 398, 412 IPC and 2/3 Gangsters Act, Police Station Khanpur, District Bulandshahar. (iv) Case Crime No. 85/2009 under Section 25 of the Arms Act , Police Station Khanpur District Bullandshehar. Learned counsel for the respondent also submits that out of 19 witnesses, 10 witnesses have already been examined. In view of the above that the trial of the case is in progress, I do not find it to be a fit case for bail. Dismissed. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) 28.07.2011. JUDGE Anoop