IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 7883 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: 29.04.2010. Vikas and another ...... PETITIONERS Versus State of Haryana. ...... RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ranvir Singh Arya, D.A.G., Haryana. Mr. J.S.Ahlawat, Advocate for the complainant. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.58 dated 20.02.2010, under Sections 420/406/467/468/471/506 IPC, registered at Police Station city Narwana, District Jind. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. Crl.Misc.No.M-7883 of 2010 This Court while issuing notice of motion on 22.03.2010. passed the following order:- “Crl.M.No.14168 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M 7883 of 2010 Notice of motion for 29.04.2010. However, petitioners are directed to join the investigation and in case they are arrested, they shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have already joined the investigation pursuant to said order dated 22.03.2010. It is further contended that allegations against the petitioners – accused are vague in nature and that the FIR has been registered against them only as a counter blast when the petitioners issued notice to the complainant for recovery of amount of the cheque which was given by the complainant to the present petitioners. It is further contended that no other cheque or cheque book of complainant is in the possession of the petitioners as the same cannot be in possession of the petitioners. Bail application of the petitioners has been opposed by learned counsel for the State on the plea that cheque and cheque book of complainant is to be recovered from the petitioners. I have considered all the facts and circumstances of the case. Allegation against the petitioners are vague in nature. It has not been specified as to when and which cheque book of complainant was allegedly given to the petitioners. 2 Crl.Misc.No.M-7883 of 2010 Hence, in view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed by Vikas and Jai Bhagwan is accepted and order dated 22.03.2010 granting interim bail to petitioners is, hereby, made absolute subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) April 29, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 3