\., HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 617 10F 2022 Between: SriAddankiKishoreBabu,S/o.LateA/somaiah,Age.43Years,occupation:Bu^siness' Hli,.'ios,'crriii. nrJnJ",'si r.'ro.+, cr"in cotony, Sanath Nasar, Hyderabad, 500 018. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana State Ltd ' rep by its Chairman and Managing D,&i;r. Ht;i;; iis-corporaie office at 6-5-50' Mint Compound, HYderabad. 2. The Superintendrng Engineer, (Operations) Telangana State Southern Power - oi.itioriion Cornpiny r-ia.. cvrieicitv circle' Hyderabad 3. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, (operations) Telanoana state southern Power Distributlon co.p"nV'iio"' rti;r"6'sh'sub-Division' Hvderabad' 4. Nizampet Municipal Corporation' Rep by its Commissioner' Nizampet' Medchal Malka2giri District, TS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in th" ,ffi;;'rileo t,erewitn, the Hiqh court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ oioJr',ol"o;l;;;;"r" particuiaitv o"ne in the nature of wirt of Mandamus declaring tn" IIiiJn -oi illl n"tpondents in not releasing the power suoolv to the petitione's pl"p"iv tit'"Ld in Pt' f'ro i-oz and 368' in Survey No' 29 and 30, Bachupallv virr'g"l'F"'niili'-aulh'pullv' o'tnuuttup" Mandal' Medchal Malkazgiri District', " lfi;n"i";;rL' voio' '"ultt'lu and unconstitutional and conseouentty direct the ,".;;;i".1;'i; ,L'i"lr" tn" fo*"t supplv to Propertv of the oetitioner situated i" Pt ii":i';; '"Jeoa' in.survev r'to z's ino 30' Bachupallv villaqe, Panchvat a'"nupl]rvl"qutnt'rLp-tlr. vandai' Medchal Malkazgiri District' without insisting tor. occ';;;v i"'titititt; from the 4th Respondent' ...RESPONDENTS ircumstances stated in av be Pleased to issue upply to Property of the 29 and 30 bachuPattY isting uPon occupancy it petition. IANO:1 OF 2022 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c the affidavit filed in suppori of the petition, the Hi.gh court m I[i"iJi"., iirlrction to ihe respondents to release the power s oetitioner situated in pt ilolioi and 368 in survey No outhbullapur mandal meoci'li maf r<a'igiri district without ins certificate from the atn otpolO"nt p""if i"g disposal of the wr' Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI'GANAPATHI KOLLI Counsel for the Respondent Nos'1 to 3 : SRI'R'VINOD REDDY Counsel for the ResPondent No'4 : SRI.N.PRAVEEN KUMAR The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A'ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6171. of2022 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner' Sri R'Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Telangana State Southern power Distribution Company Limited appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3, and Sri NPraveen Kumatl, learnecl Standing Counsei for Municipaiities appearing for respondent No'4' With their consent' the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself' 2) When the matter is taken up for hearing' the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.26085 o{ 2018, dated26'07'2018' and W'P'No'6030 of 2020' dated20.04.2020. 3) The above said submission is not disputed by the learned Standing Counseis appearing for the respondents herein' 4) In view of the same and for the reasons alike in the order dated26.07.2018, passed in WP'No'26085 of 2018' the present Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to release the power supply to the premises of the petitioner' subiect to compliance of the terms and conditions and on furnishing an undertaking to produce the Occupancy Certificate from the concerned Municipal Corporation, within a prescribed period' and if no such Occupancy Certificate is produced witirin such period' it is z open to the respondents to take aPPropriate action, in accord ance with law. Further, this order does rrot preclude the official respondents from rejecting the application made by the petifioner, if it is found that the subject property is a vacant Iand and no shucfure is in existence. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR tu.,' To SECTTON OFFTCER 1' The chairman and Managing Director, southern power Distribution company of I;!'J,g?:? state Ltd., Hi,i,is its coip;;#;;i;" ar 6-s-so, N/int compound, 2' The superintendino f ngi6ser,. (op_erations) Terangana state southern power Distribution como#y L-t,r cvti"r'citv.i]i..i6,' fi v"o"r.oro 3' The Assistant Divisionar Engiheer, rcipJrJii,inrj rurangana state southern . i;y3:?il,,i1yJf !,.c.9 l nu n i Lr.i, r bii'n i i,'o,s i's,b- oi,r. io n, H yo e ra ba a - Malkazgiri oi.tri.t, rIl'u'pet Municipal corfioration, Nizampeil lrrlil[Ji 3 3i3 33 rs 3fl 3nf,ii,#fi;iHi;iiilr,i.,.i"":::, 7. One CC to SRt.N.pR 8. Two CD Cooies 9. One spare coov (Along with the copv'o',f order dated 26/07/2018 in w.p. No. 26085 0f 201B) //TRUE COPY// SA NPJ ? \ \ t HIGH COURT DATED:0410212022 ORDER WP.No.6171 o't 2022 DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS, CDuf'o \0 a2- I 3 17FEB2022 rA S E- 1 't.- \ \r# THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO wRIT PETITION No. 26085of2 o18 OR D ERr respondent. 2. It is stated by learned counsel Heard counsel for the petitioner, Sri R. Vinod Reddy, Standing counsel for Terangana State Southern power Distribution Corporation Limited, appearing for respondents 1 to 3, and Sri L.Venkateshwar Rao, Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, appearing for 4th petitioner as well as Sri R.Vinod Reddy, appearing for respondent Nos. 1 appearing for the Standing counsel to 3 that the issue in this the order of this Court Writ Petition is covered by dt.23.03.2018 in W.P.No.9789 of 2018. 3. Therefore for reasons alike, this Writ petition is also disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the power supply to the premises of the petitioner subject to the compliance of the.terms and conditions and on furnishing an undertaking to produce the occupancy certificate from the concerned Municipal Corporation within a prescribed period, and if no such occupancy certificate is produced within such period, it is open to the respondents to take appropriate action in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs I 2 4. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed. M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J 26th July, 2018. gra