1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8088 OF 2009 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ This petition has been filed on mis- information that the respondent nos.3 to 5 have been appointed on the post of Driver in terms of letter dated 14.5.2001. According to the counsel for the respondent no.5, the respondent no.5 has not been appointed on the post of Driver so far since the communication was only an intimation of selection and that he would be considered for appointment in due course. Learned A.G.P. also submits that no appointment order has been issued in favour of the respondent nos.3 to 5 as it was only a case of recommendation to consider the claim of the respondent nos.3 to 5 for appointment on the post of Driver. 2 In view of the recent Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of Rajendra Pandurang Pagare V/s State of Maharashtra reported in 2009 (4) Maharashtra Law Journal, 961, the appointment procedure has been now well defined. No appointment can be made unless the authorities were to adhere to the said procedure. All prospective appointments will have to abide by the said regime. In that view of the matter, the grievance brought before this Court by the petitioner need not be examined any further. Instead, it will be open to the petitioner to apply as required in terms of the procedure prescribed by the Full Bench of this Court. If such an application is made, it will be considered on its own merits in accordance with law. Petition disposed of on the above terms. (S.S. SHINDE, J) (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J) Dt/- 09.02.2010 ndk/c92106