IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.177 of 2010 Unit Head, RBHM, National Jute Manufactures Corporation Limited Unit Katihar :---respondent no. 7/petitioner. Versus 1. Sheo Kumar Shukla, son of late Baijnath Shukla, resident of Durgapur, P.S. P.O. & District- Katihar :--petitioner/Opposite 1st Party. 2. Union Of India through Secretary, Ministry of Textile, Government of India, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi. 3. Joint Secretary, Ministry of Textile, Government of India, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi. 4. National Jute Manufactures Corporation Ltd., A Government of India Undertaking having its registered office at Chatered Bank Buildings (2nd Floor), 4 N.S.Road, Calcutta-700001 through its Chairman-cum- Director. 5. Chairman-cum-Managing Director, National Jute Manufactures Corporation Ltd., A Government of India Undertaking having its registered office at Chatered Bank Buildings (2nd Floor), 4 N.S. Road, Calcutta- 700001. 6. Officiating Assistant General Manager (Personnel), National Jute Manufactures Corporation Ltd., A Government of India Undertaking having its registered office at Chatered Bank Building (2nd Floor), 4 N.S. Road, Calcutta-700001. 7. Deputy Manager (Personnel), National Jute Manufactures Corporation Ltd., A Government of India Undertaking having its registered office at Chatered Bank Buildings (2nd Floor), 4 N.S. Road, Calcutta- 700001. 8. Arvind Kumar Singh, working as Personnel incharge, National Jute Manufactures Corporation Limited, Unit R.B.H.M., Katihar. 9. Arun Kumar Chakraborty, working as Deputy Manager (Finance), National Jute Manufactures Corporation Limited Unit, RBHM, Katihar :---respondents/Opposite 2nd Party. ---------------------------------- 2. 03.08.2011. Heard learned counsel for the review- petitioner who is seeking review of the order dated 22.4.2010 passed in C.W.J.C.No. 12113 of 2000, whereunder this Court directed the review-petitioner to grant the writ-petitioner benefit of pay revision with effect from the date such revision is allowed to the other employees of the National Jute Manufactures Corporation 2 Limited. Review of the aforesaid direction is being sought on the ground that when this Court passed the aforesaid order dated 22.4.2010 the writ-petitioner suppressed from this Court the factum of his voluntary retirement which he had taken during the pendency of the writ petition i.e. 07.08.2009. In this connection learned counsel has relied on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Board of Control for Cricket in India and another Vs. Netaji Cricket Club and others, reported in (2005) 4 Supreme Court Cases 741 paragraph 88-90. Petitioner filed the writ petition in the year 2000 praying, inter alia, to direct the authorities of the Corporation to grant him the benefit of the pay revision which was allowed to him earlier. This Court under orders dated 22.4.2010 disposed of the writ petition directing the Corporation to grant the benefit of the pay revision to the petitioner as and when such benefit of the pay revision is allowed to the other employees of the Corporation. The order of this Court was quite clear that petitioner became entitled for grant of pay revision from the date other employees of the Corporation 3 were allowed such benefit until the date petitioner continued in service. 2. In the circumstances, there does not appear to be any error in the order dated 22.4.2010 much less any error apparent on the face of the record. The Civil Review petition is dismissed with cost which is assessed at Rs. 5000/- which should be deposited within one month from the date of this order in the account of the Patna High Court Legal Aid Committee. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)