THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.13823 of 2010 ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in taking steps to alienate the property of the petitioner admeasuring Ac.0.39 cts in R.S. No.68/2, 0.84 cts in R.S. No.46/4 and 2.14 cts in R.S. No.47/7 situated in Rangappagudem village, Buttaigudem Mandal, West Godavari District, as arbitrary and illegal. A further direction is sought to restrain the 1st respondent from taking action pursuant to the proceedings in Roc. No.440/2007 and proceedings No.441/2007 dated 19.11.2007 till the disposal of W.P. No.9519 of 2008. This Court, by order in W.P.M.P. No.17409 of 2010 dated 18.06.2010, directed maintenance of status quo with regards the nature and possession of the land in question. Smt. S.V. Indira, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the present Writ Petition is filed by the daughter of the petitioner in W.P. No.9519 of 2008 on the ground that she had filed a suit in O.S. No.26 of 2009 before the Special Assistant Agent to the Government i.e., the Revenue Divisional Officer, Jangareddigudem questioning the order of the Special Deputy Collector dated 16.03.1979; the Revenue Divisional Officer, by order in I.A. No.50 of 2009 in O.S. No.26 of 2009 dated 07.12.2009, had directed both parties to maintain status quo until the orders of this Court in W.P. No.9519 of 2009; and, since the order of the Special Deputy Collector has been subjected to challenge before the Special Assistant Agent and an order of injunction was passed, no action can be taken by the respondent pursuant to the earlier proceedings dated 19.11.2007. Sri K. Ramesh Babu, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the 3rd and 4th respondents, would submit that the very same order, as is under challenge in this Writ Petition, was the subject matter of challenge before this Court in W.P. No.9519 of 2008 by the mother of the petitioner; this Court had dismissed the Writ Petition holding that, as long as the order of the Special Deputy Collector dated 16.03.1979 continued to remain in force, no exception could be taken to the steps initiated by respondents 1 to 3; the petitioner herself had admitted before the Special Deputy Collector that the 4th and 5th respondents in the said Writ Petition (3rd and 4th respondents in the present Writ Petition) were in possession of the land; O.S. No.26 of 2009 was dismissed by the Special Assistant Agent by judgment dated 01.05.2010, even before the present Writ Petition came to be filed before this Court in June, 2010; and the petitioner, suppressing the fact of the suit having been dismissed, had filed the present Writ Petition. As the very same proceedings were put in issue by the petitioner’s mother in W.P. No.9519 of 2008, and this Court had dismissed the Writ Petition on 19.11.2009, and since O.S. No.26 of 2009 filed against the order of the Special Deputy Collector dated 16.03.1979 has, itself, been dismissed; the petitioner is not entitled to the relief sought for in the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition fails and is, accordingly, dismissed. However, in the circumstances, without costs. _____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J 15.09.2011 MRKR