1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD C.A. NO. 9404 OF 2009 WITH C.A. NO. 9405 OF 2009 IN F.A. (ST) NO. 18860 OF 2009 WITH C.A. NO. 9406 OF 2009 WITH C.A. NO. 9407 OF 2009 IN F.A. (ST) NO. 18857 OF 2009 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : P.R. BORKAR.J. DATED : 07.04.2010 1. Heard Adv. Shri S.V. Kulkarni for the applicant and Adv. Shri M.V. Ghadge h/f. Adv. Shri B.N. Gadegaonkar for respondent No.2. These are applications for condonation of delay of 399 and 430 days respectively in filing appeals by the Insurance Company against orders of N.F.L. amounts in compensation awarded in M.A.C.P. On 25.03.2008. In these cases the order passed are interim orders. The reasons given for delay are that the matters had to be referred by the Divisional Office, Nanded to Regional Office and had to be taken advise. Therefore, 2 there was delay. Not being satisfied with the reasons given for delay and considering that these are appeals only challenging interim orders below Exh. 5 of petition under section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, the applications deserve to be dismissed. Hence, the applications for condonation of delay are dismissed. 2. In view of dismissal of applications for condonation of delay, the applications for stay do not survive and they are disposed of as such. 3. The claimants/respondents are allowed to withdraw the amount deposited in this Court. [P.R. BORKAR,J.] snk/2010/APR10/ca9404.09