HIGH COURT 0? CH}1ATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRIT PETITION ( S) N0. 3371 of20[§7 Dori Lal Gore Agsd about 43 Years, S/o. Shri Mitthu Lai Gore, Assisiant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Gahira: Block Lailunga, Distt. Ra§garh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1..State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Departmeiit D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur {C.G.) 3. Di$trict Education O$cer Raigafh District Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer Lailunga, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) KJI Assistam Commissiooer Tribal Welfare Department Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF 1ND1A Present: Singie Bench : Hon’hie Justice Shri Satish K. Agnjhotri. Shri Anil Mourya, Advocate for the petitioner. ' 1--: m1 ‘1f.S. 'T‘L maxim, 1 l" uo‘w. v‘ tauvocate A ,1 4 for 4the stale/respoiideiits. 0 / ORDER (Passed on 26m aiay of June, 2007) The question of law involved herein is asto whether the petitioner iS entitied to regular pay scaie wefthe eats of initial appointment or from the date of completion ofprobation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W.P.(S) No. 5976/2006 {Sushi} Tiwari and others Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh & Others), which was allowed Vide order dated 7.11.2(l06. in view ofthe above-stated submissions made by learned counsel for the parties. the writ petition is alloweo in the same terms No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge