{1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.9953 OF 2010 Anusayabai w/o Shriram Hiwale Petitioner Versus Jijarao s/o Gulabrao Jagtap and another Respondents Mr.S.M.Avhad, advocate for petitioner CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : 20 th October, 2010 PER COURT: 1 The applications tendered to the appellate Court requesting to grant permission to amend pleadings and also to permit him to produce additional evidence have been turned down by the appellate court and those orders passed at interlocutory stage of the appeal, are subjected to challenge in this petition. 2 The amendment relates to certain developments which have taken place during continuance of the suit. No reason is shown as to why the petitioner was prohibited from applying the amendment while hearing of suit was in progress. In these circumstances, the appellate Court has rightly refused to invoke powers under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure and turned down the request made by petitioner. {2} 3 The additional evidence, which is sought to be produced before the Court, is also in respect of occurrences which have taken place during continuance of the suit. The appellate Court has rightly turned down the request in that regard too. 4 In exercise of powers conferred upon this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution, no interference is called for. Petition is devoid of substance. 5 Writ Petition, therefore, stands rejected. R.M.BORDE JUDGE adb/wp995310