IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1252 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: September 09, 2009. Rambhagat ...Petitioner(s) v. Maha Singh & Ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri Parveen Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Shri Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for Shri Narender Hooda, Advocate ORDER Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): As per the averments made in this contempt petition, CWP No.1504 of 2007 was disposed of vide judgment dated 17.9.2008 and a direction was given to the respondents to provide a path to the land of the petitioner and in spite of the request made by the petitioner to the respondents, he was not provided any path and, thus, the respondents are guilty of committing contempt of this court. In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court, reply by way of affidavit of respondent No.4 was filed wherein it has been submitted that the demarcation of the path was done vide Rapat Roznamcha No.551 dated 28.8.2009 by the Kanungo and at the time of demarcation, the petitioner was also present. In view of the reply filed by respondent No.4, I am not inclined to proceed further as in compliance of the directions passed by this Court, the petitioner has been provided a path to his land. Rule discharged. September 09, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge