IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.4793/2008 Decided on:11.8.2010 _____________________________________________ Ravinder Kumar. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. Advocate General. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner lost his father on 13.1.1995. He is seeking direction to the respondents to consider his case for compassionate appointment. It has come in the reply that one of the brothers of the petitioner is gainfully employed in Government service. Consequently, case of the petitioner is not covered under para 5 (c) of the Policy. The compassionate appointment is provided to enable the family to tide over the crises immediately after the death of bread earner. Moreover, 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 petitioner’s father died on 13.1.1995 and no direction can be issued at this belated stage. 2. Accordingly, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 11.8.2010 *awasthi*