W. A. No.121/2010 16.11.2011 We have heard learned counsel for the parties on I. A. No.2847/2010, an application for condonation of delay. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, we are satisfied that sufficient cause for condonation of delay is made out. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Heard on the question of admission. In this intra Court appeal the appellant has challenged the validity of the order dated 9.11.2009 passed by learned Single Judge by which the writ petition preferred by the appellant has been dismissed. Facts giving rise for filing this appeal are that the appellant claims himself to be the Secretary of Maihar Swarnkar Sangh, a society registered under the provisions of Madhya Pradesh Societies Ragistrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973 (for short herein after referred to as the Act). The appellant had filed a writ petition seeking direction to the Registrar, Firms and Societies to decide the complaint lodged by the appellant against the Society by invoking powers under Section 32 of the Act. The learned Single Judge vide order dated 9.11.2009 dismissed the writ petition on the ground that a condition precedent for invoking the powers under Section 32 of the Act is not fulfilled in the facts and circumstances of the case. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that under Section 32 of the Act the Registrar has the power to act on a complaint suo moto. We have considered the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant. The petitioner has no right to compel the Registrar to act suo moto. If the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is accepted, then the provisions of Section 32 (2) of the Act, which require that an inquiry to be held into the affairs of the Society on the application by majority of members of the governing body of the Society or by not less than 1/3 total number of the members of the Society, would be rendered redundant. For the aforementioned reasons we do not find any merit in the writ appeal. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. (Sushil Harkauli) (Alok Aradhe) Acting Chief Justice Judge AK