1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.317 OF 2008 Sushil Subhash Shah ..Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & ors ..Respondents Mr.Prashant Bhavake i/b.Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr.D.A.Patil, AGP, for the respondent No.1 CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATE : 4TH MARCH, 2009 P.C. . The contempt alleged is of the Order dated 20th July, 2007, passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No.1673 of 2007. 2. By the said Order, the respondent No.2. i.e.the Collector of Pune was directed to decide the issue as to whether the land alloted to members of the Pasalkar family under the Scheme for Project 2 affected persons, was in excess of the permissible limits after hearing the petitioner. The Collector, Pune, has accordingly passed an order on 3rd January, 2009, which order is annexed to the Affidavit-in-reply filed by the Collector. The petitioner seeks to raise various issues as regards the said order. In my view, since the Collector has passed the said order dated 3rd January, 2009, the order of which contempt is alleged has been complied with. In my view, therefore, no case for invoking the contempt jurisdiction is made out. 3. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order dated 3rd January, 2009, he may adopt appropriate proceedings to challenge the said order and if such proceedings are filed, filing of the instant Contempt Petition would not come in the way of the petitioner. It is made clear that none of the contentions of the parties have been dealt with. The above Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) 3