IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CAZ NO. 341/2009 IN LPA ST.NO. 6026 OF 2009 IN WP NO. 578 OF 2003 (Municipal Council, Pawani vs. Bhagwan Punjaji Awasare) AND CAZ NO. 343/2009 IN LPA NO. 6014 OF 2009 IN WP NO. 585 OF 2003 (Municipal Council, Pawani vs. Harihar Gopal Nanhe) AND CAZ NO. 349/2009 IN LPA ST.NO. 6025 OF 2009 IN WP NO. 579 OF 2003 (Municipal Council, Pawani vs. Shailendra Bhaskar Ghodichor) AND CAZ NO. 361/2009 IN LPA ST. NO. 6012 OF 2009 IN WP NO. 583 OF 2003 (Municipal Council, Pawani vs. Diwakar Shankarrao Bhoge) AND CAZ NO. 372/2009 IN LPA NO. 6020 OF 2009 IN WP NO. 577 OF 2003 (Municipal Council, Pawani vs. Balaji Girmaji Katekhaye) WITH CAZ NO. 374/2009 IN LPA NO. 6017 OF 2009 IN WP NO. 580 OF 2003 (Municipal Council, Pawani vs. Raju Sadashiv Bawankar) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & F.M. REIS, JJ. JUNE 29, 2009. Heard Shri Dhatrak, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Jaiswal, learned counsel for the respondent. In view of the uncontroverted averments, Civil Application for condonation of delay is allowed. Admit. Prima facie we see no reason to stay the judgment in appeal since the retrenchment is found to have been effected without following the procedure prescribed by law. It is made clear that the appellant shall be entitled to effect retrenchment of the respondent prospectively in accordance with law. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.