1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.40 OF 2010 IN FCA/23/2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders. Mr R.S.Upadhyay, for the applicant/appellant. Mr A.M.Vernekar, for the respondent. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE AND R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATE : 02/03/2010 PC: Heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of the order dated 16.2.2010 passed by this court in the Appeal, Mr Upadhyay, learned counsel for the applicant, does not press this application. It is disposed of as not pressed. At this stage, Mr Upadhyay, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, makes a statement that the applicant shall continue to pay the interim maintenance from this month, which the applicant was paying to the respondent- T 2 wife during pendency of the petition before the Family Court. His statement is accepted. Mr Vernekar, learned counsel for the respondent-wife, submits that the respondent-wife has already filed Petition under sections 18 and 20 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act in the Family Court. On instructions he submits that in view of the statement made by Mr Upadhyay, the respondent-wife shall not apply for interim maintenance in the said petition. His statement is accepted. At this stage, learned counsel for the parties have also requested to record in this order that the respondent-wife will allow the applicant-husband to avail the access as per the order dated 4.7.2009. in Petition No.A-2244 of 2007 passed by the Family Court. Her statement is accepted. (R.Y.GANOO, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) 3 4