IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 590 of 2010. Decided on: 4.3.2010 Sohan Lal …. Petitioner Versus H.P.F.C. and another. ….. Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr.Justice V.K.Ahuja, Judge Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr.Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral) CMP No.915 of 2010: Allowed. CWP No.590 of 2010: The writ petitioner has filed the writ petition with the following prayers: i) That the writ in the nature certiorari may kindly be issued quashing the order of attachment of the mortgaged land of the petitioner contained in Annexure P-2 issued by the respondent No.2 and also quashing the rejection of the representation order dated 20th August, 2007 (Annexure P-3). ii) That writ in the nature of the mandamus may kindly be issued retraining the respondent No.2 from selling the mortgaged land and property comprised in Khata Khatauni No.212/225, Khasra No.949/707, measuring 15.6 bighas, situated in Muhal Gaiyana, P.O. Mangoo, Tehsil Arki, District Solan, H.P. 2 It appears that the petitioner has certain disputes with regard to the statement of accounts maintained by the first respondent. In such circumstances, it is only appropriate that the petitioner is given an opportunity to approach the first respondent itself and have his accounts properly verified. We, therefore, dispose the writ petition as follows. The petitioner may file an appropriate representation alongwith a copy of this writ petition before the first respondent within two weeks from today. In the event that the petitioner approaches the first respondent as above, the petitioner/his duly arranged agent shall be given opportunity to verify the accounts and thereafter, the first respondent shall issue a proper statement of accounts to the petitioner. This shall be done within another one month. However, we make it clear that further proceedings for sale of the attached property shall be deferred till such time. We also clarify that in case the petitioner does not pay the amounts within the permitted time by the first respondent, as per the new statement of accounts, it will be open to respondents No.1 and 2 to proceed with the sale. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly, so also the pending application(s), if any. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice. March 4, 2010 (V.K.Ahuja) (trs/bss) Judge