s ^2 lyTlIRHK^CQURTQFCHHATTISGAKH AT^UASPUR W.P. (C| No. S>^ O /2010 PETITIONBR ::SomnathKesharwani,agedabout34 years, S/o Pitambar Prasad Kesharwani, R/o T.V. Tower, Choteuttarmuda, Raigarh, Tahsil and District Raigarh (C.G.) WERSVS ^^ 1 • •'. RESPONDBNTS 1) State of Chhattisgarh through : Secretary Deparfcnent of Revenue D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2) The GoUector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3) Nazul Qfficer, Raigarh, Djstrict Raigarh (C.G.) 4) Municipal Corporation Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT _]n^imao_N UNDER ARTICLE 22€ __QF^'niE CONSTTNnTGW OF INmA . FQR ISSHAKCS^ ^^^^^^^^ O^ APPRQPRIATE __ ^WRITiEWmT&_ ___J^IMMt/<mB@BS. ^ "-HC—78 an^rwfyfRi' 'WI 3TI^T sb^f^t ti: 1 y. 75T -<<1'41CT<<, Wtll'M'IS, fac1l'L1lj,< ^.....L.J:.€^......S.^L ..elLi. WWIT *<41t*» r^-D—'•<»•- y/^ 200 St^V itPW ('^lfg^tT) ?WIWHf%W SI^I SB: Hon'bleShri Manindra M<khan Shrivastava. J 1.4.2010 Smt. Hamida Siddiqui, c( Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel to 3, on adyance CQpy. The grievanee of the peti^ioner are proceeding to grant lease dispute in Writ Petition (C{ challenged orders dated 8.8.: cancelled in respect of the sarrle was passed to the effect that 8.8.2006 and 17.3.2007 shall Leamed coiansel for thel petition is pendir^ order is still operative. of lease has been stayed by not to have initiated any lease nor should have entertailied is also submitted that thougl|r raised on 10.2.21110 (Annex)-ire petitioner's apprehension is consideratjion Subniislsion tttis proce^jdin thtt chHlci^lll HWV^ tf fs^ <f<1-fr$t< ^ajfiftTOTtn unsel for the petitionep. Lawyer for the State/respondents No. 1 is that the respendent authorities |of the land which is subject matter of N.129/07, whereia petitioner has ,3006 8s 17.3.2005 wbereby lease was ije land. On 21.8.2007, an interim order Ihe effect and operatian of order dated r^main stayed until further orders. petitioner submits th-at the aforesaid before this Court and the interim is that as the order^of cancellation Court, respondent-authorities ought lings for allotment of fce same land on any application for grant oflease. It an objection to this effect has been P-20) before the Nazool Officer, without considering the objection, the ^ XI-HC—78 sn^i w h-v^i WIT SW^S shtli'* Praveen "SrcT'•qra?PT, ®til'y<is,f°«Yii'yli,< HINMI gWT^l "^200 3?I^?T'^5R7 ( 'jqt^iyf) ^iiwdfersn^i —2. Nazool Officer may proceed to p to one Dayakishan Agrawal. Petitioner having subin: Officer on 10.2.20:1,,0 bringing 1 passed on 21.8.20D7 in W.P.f authority shall take-the same ir] It would be &pen for the vaay be available torhiin under passed. .. of. 4)|^id141*1 ^IHt'll''^^1^ <rai+$l< ^siRmsn^i ass order in the matter ofgrantof lease tted an objection before the Nazool o its notice interim order of fhis Court E;) No. 129/07, it is expected that the ,to consideration and Aecided the same. .^ietitioner to take appri^riate remedy as l&ie law in the eyent aasadverse order is With the aforesaid obsei|yations, the petition S fmally disposed Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrwastava Judge