1 wpl703.11.sxw ssm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 703 OF 2011 Mekan J. Gala .....Petitioner Vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce & Ors. ......Respondents. Mr. Mathews J. Nedumpara for the Petitioner. Mr. Prasad Das i/by M/s. Goenka Law Associates for Respondent No.1. CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD AND ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE : JUNE 9, 2011 P.C.: A notice has been issued under Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 on 17 January, 2011, to which the Petitioner submitted a reply on 27 March 2011. The grievance of the Petitioner is that the order thereon which has been passed on 31 March 2011 has been communicated by the Advocate appearing on behalf of the Bank. According to the Petitioner, under Section 13(3) (A) it is the secured creditor who must communicate the reasons for non-acceptance of the representation or objection of the borrower. 2 wpl703.11.sxw ssm 2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the First Respondent states that the First Respondent withdraws the communication dated 31 March, 2011 and that in terms of the provisions of Sub-Section 3(A) of Section 13, a fresh order would be passed by the First Respondent on the objection raised by the Petitioner. In view of the aforesaid statement, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks no further directions. 3 The Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)