1 fa-st.16012-08 mgn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, CIVIL JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.16012 OF 2008 Ismail Suleman Sheikh ..Applicant Vs. M.G. Sadashivan & Anr. ..Respondents Mr. S.S. Kanetkar, for the Appellant Mr. Kedar Dighe, for respondent No.1 Mr. Shailesh Redekar, for respondent Nos. 2 to 4. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D.SALVI, JJ. DATE: 19th October, 2010. P.C. Register. 2. During the pendency of this Appeal the plaintiff and defendants continued their efforts for an amicable settlement and they have been successful in the same. The settlement terms in the form of “Consent Terms” have been reduced in writing and placed before us. They have been signed by all the parties as well as their respective Advocates. The Appellant, original defendant is represented by his daughter and Constituted Attorney Smt.Salma Mustafa Sheikh and she has signed the 2 fa-st.16012-08 settlement terms as a Constituted Attorney. 3. Parties have verified the settlement terms and stated that they have understood and agreeable for the same. Undoubtedly they shall be bound by the consent terms and we find that they are reasonable and shall serve the interest of all the parties. 4. The learned Counsel for the parties, therefore, pray for a decree to be issued in terms of the consent terms so as to replace the decree impugned in the Appeal. 5. Hence the First Appeal is allowed in terms of the consent terms and the Registry to issue a fresh decree as per the same. Special Civil Suit No.188 of 2005 stands decreed in terms of the consent terms. ( U.D.SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)