IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision : January 10th, 2008 WP(C) No.5912/2002 # Sh.Sudhir Kumar ….… PETITIONER ! Through: Mr.P.S. Bindra and Mr.Mike Desai, Advocates. Versus $ Distt & Sessions Judge, Delhi & Ors ......... RESPONDENTS ^ Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat & Ms.Nidhi Gupta, Advocates. CORAM :- * HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may YES be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported NO in the Digest? ANIL KUMAR, J. (Oral) * This is a petition seeking preparation of fresh seniority list of Lower Division Clerks on the basis of merit at the time of selection and to regularise the services of the petitioner as an LDC with the respondent with effect from 3rd September, 1992. Learned counsel for the respondent contends that a tentative seniority list was prepared in 1996 and objections were invited but the objections could not be decided and subsequently another WP(C) No.5912/2002 Page 1 of 2 tentative seniority list has been prepared in 2000 and objections have been invited. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he had filed the objections to the seniority list which are annexed as Annexure P7 at page 93. Perusal of these reveals that objections were filed to the seniority list of 1996 on 27th September, 2000 and not of 2000. The counsel for the respondent states that the objections were barred by time and, therefore, they were not considered. Since a new tentative list was prepared in 2000 which had been circulated and which has not been finalized, the petitioner may file his objections to the said seniority list within four weeks which shall be considered and decided by the respondent expeditiously preferably within six months. With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of. The pending applications are also disposed of. January 10, 2008 ANIL KUMAR, J. 'Dev' WP(C) No.5912/2002 Page 2 of 2