HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9881 of 2007 DATE: 01.04.2010 Between: R. Seenappa … Petitioner and The Director General of Police, Hyderabad, and others … Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9881 of 2007 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed by R. Senappa, assailing the inaction of respondents 1 and 2 on the representations submitted by him on 08.01.2007 and 31.01.2007. 2. A double-murder took place in Oddumadi village on 20.07.2006. The petitioner figured as a circumstantial witness to the said incident. A case in Crime No.39 of 2006 was registered by the S.H.O., P.S. Rallabudugur, Chittoor District-4th respondent, recording the incident wherein two persons were killed. The petitioner claims to have given a clue with regard to the murder, which ultimately resulted in arrest of one Mani. Pursuant to the confession statement given by Mani, some other accused came to be arrested in Crime No.39 of 2006. Apprehending danger from the hands of Mani and other accused, the petitioner submitted representations dated 08.01.2007 and 31.01.2007 to the Director General of Police, Hyderabad-1st respondent and the Inspector General of Police, C.I.D., Lakdikapool, Hyderabad-2nd respondent. There being no action on his representations, he approached this Court and filed the writ petition invoking the jurisdiction of this Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. The writ petition came to be admitted on 01.05.2007. The petitioner also filed W.P.M.P.No.12515 of 2007 seeking interim relief. When the W.P.M.P. came up for consideration, with the consent of the counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for disposal. 4. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the representations submitted by him on 08.01.2007 and 31.01.2007 to respondents 1 and 2 have not been considered. Such is the situation, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representations of the petitioner submitted on 08.01.2007 and 31.01.2007 and initiate appropriate action. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________________ B. SESHASAYANA REDDY,J 1st April, 2010 CBS HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9881 of 2007 (Disposed of) 1st April, 2010 CBS