WP(C) 4383/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEB.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. M. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. R. Chakrab orty, learned State Counsel. None has appeared for the respondent No. 6. The petitioner, a Gaon Panchayat Secretary is aggrieved by Annexure-2 order date d 5.10.2009 by which he was transferred to another place. A copy of the order am ongst other was endorsed to the MLA of the particular constituency. Thus it is t he case of the petitioner that the transfer order has not been issued in any pub lic interest, but has been issued on the behest of the said MLA. This fact has f airly admitted in the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the Zilla Parishad, in wh ich it has been stated that the transfer has been affected as was suggested by t he MLA. The impugned transfer order could not be given effect to in view of the interim order passed. By now about two years have elapsed. In view of the above, the impugned transfer order, so far it relates to the peti tioner shall not be given effect. With the above observation, writ petition stands disposed of.