IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 19TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3883 of 2011(I) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------- 1. SULTHAN KANNU, THOTTIYOD PUTHEN VEEDU, VIZHINJAM. 2. ARIF KHAN, S/O.MOHAMMED ABDUL KHADER,PANAYARAKUZHI PURAYIDOM, OPPOSITE TO AMBAL KULAM, VIZHINJAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. KUNJUMUHAMMED, S/O.USSANARU PILLA, THOTTIYODU VEEDU, OPPOSITE TO RAMZAN KULAM, BEANCH, VIZHINJAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. FATHIMA BEEVI, D/O.RAVIATH BEEVI, AGED 40 YEARS, SIDDHIQ MANZIL, MELATHIL VILA, PUTHOORKONAM.P.O., NEYYATTINKARA. BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 2. ASST.COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, FORT.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,VIZHINJAM.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 521. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,VIZHINJAM.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 521. 5. ABDUL KALAM,S/O.MYTHEENKANNU LABBA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,THAHAMANZIL, VIZHINJAM.P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 521. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan & P.S.Gopinathan, JJ. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.3883 of 2011-I = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 8th day of February, 2011. Judgment Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. 1.Notice to fifth respondent is dispensed with preserving his right to seek rehearing of this matter, if aggrieved by the directions being issued hereunder. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 4. We find that the petitioners' case is that there is a civil suit between the private parties and there are interlocutory orders, including issuance of commission. Under such circumstances, without expressing anything on merits, we direct WPC3883/11 -: 2 :- that the second respondent will take up Ext.P10, consider the same and issue such directions as may be necessary to meet the allegations of the petitioners. If it is found that there is any requirement of a report to be sent to the Police Complaint Authority, that shall be duly sent. Let it be done in terms of these directions. The petitioner to place a copy of this judgment and a copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for compliance. The writ petition ordered accordingly. Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, Judge. P.S.Gopinathan, Judge. Sha/0302