IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 21ST BHADRA 1929 AS.No. 684 of 2001(E) --------------------- OS.341/1995 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ATTINGAL .................... APPELLANT: 2ND DEFENDANT ----------- JAYASREE, W/O.SURENDRAN NAIR, VIKAS VILLA FROM PADINJATTAI VEEDU NAVAIKULAM DESOM AND VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.R.MANOJ SMT.SINDHU MANOJ RESPONDENTS: PLAINTIFFS & DEFENDANTS 1,3,4,5 & 6. ------------- 1. ABDUL VAHEED, S/O.ALIYARU KUNJU, SHAHNA COTTAGE, KUDAVOOR DESOM AND VILLAGE. 2. SURENDRAN NAIR, S/O.KRISHNA PILLAI, VIKAS VILLA FROM PADINJATTAI VEEDU NAVAIKULAM DESOM AND VILLAGE. 3. RADHAMMA, D/O.CHELLAMMA, PARAYATHUKONATHU, RADHA MANDIRAM, KIZHUVILAM DESOM AND VILLAGE. 4. RAZILUDEEN, S/O.ABDUL RAHUMAN, SIMI PALACE, PULLOORMUKKU, KUDAVOOR DESOM AND VILLAGE. 5. SACHITHA, D/O.MUHAMMED SALI, SIMI PALACE, PULLOORMUKKU, KUDAVOOR DESOM AND VILLAGE. 6. SASIDHARAN NAIR, S/O.PADMANABHAN PILLAI, SREE PADMAM, NAVAIKULAM DESOM AND VILLAGE. BY THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- A.S.No.684 of 2001 ------------------------------- Dated this the 12th September, 2007. J U D G M E N T When the appeal came up for curing defects, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the appeal has become infructuous. Submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant is recorded. In the result, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE nj. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- A.S.No.684 of 2001 J U D G M E N T Dated:12th September, 2007. -------------------------------