BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16806 of 2011 1. FLARENCE DHAS 2. GLINTON DHAS 3. GIBSON DHAS 4. JACOB : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2, 4, 5 & 8 Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ASARIPALLAM POLICE STATION NO.4, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. (CR.NO.600/2011) : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. N.DILIP KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr. K.S.DURAI PANDIAN Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- This petition has been filed by the petitioner, who are ranked as A2,4,5 and 8 seeking Anticipatory Bail for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.600 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police. 2. Heard, Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 3. According to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, first accused has filed a writ petition before this Court in M.P.No.1 of 2011 in W.P(MD).No.14559 of 2011 has granted an interim injunction. As per the order passed by this Court, the investigation in Crime No.600 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police has been stayed and there will not be any further investigation. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) has taken note of the injunction order passed by this Court and submitted that till then there cannot be any apprehension of arrest and the respondent cannot arrest the petitioners. He would therefore request the Court to pass suitable orders. 5. Considering the submissions made by both sides, this Court could see that this Court has passed an order of interim injunction in W.P(MD).No.14559 of 2011 in M.P.No.1 of 2011 in which the respondent police cannot do further investigation in this case. In the said circumstances, there is no need for the respondent police to arrest the petitioners and the apprehension in arresting the petitioners for the purpose of investigation is not at all germane and therefore there is no need for granting any anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petition filed by the petitioner seeking anticipatory bail is dismissed as unnecessary. sd/- 21/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ASARIPALLAM POLICE STATION NO.4, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. +1 CC to M/S. N.DILIP KUMAR Advocate SR.No.45062 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16806 of 2011 Date :21/12/2011 NSV/26.12.11/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/