l l w (I sinfie mu. IN THE HIGH COURT VOF-CHH’ATTISGfA . g W. P. (S) No. 5323} 0B? 201 1 \Q , ' @ RH AT_BILASPUR ‘ . l Sheetal Rarfn Druw, S/o. late Shari Halalu Ram Dhru‘w, age;d about 43 years, R/o. Villagé Mohpur, Post Vyash Kungera, Pblice Statior'i, Tahsili [a PETITIONER i nd Districf Kankey (C.G.) IVERSUS / : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur’ (C. G.) / ‘ 2. The Secretary, _ Tribal Welfare Department . D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) K 3. District Education Officer, Dharntari, District Dhmtari (C.G.) REsFONDENTs 4. Comm1ss1oner, Schedule Tribe 8r, Schedule Caste Development, ' (Pt. Ravishankar Shukla Premises) Raipur, Distt. Raipur, (C.G.) L . a y 5. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari, (C.G.) f, I 6. Block Education Officer, Dhamtari, ‘ District Dhamtari (C.G.)- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SE : Hon’bie Shri Manindra M han ShriVastava J. 27-06 2011 Shri Somkant Verma, co nsel for th‘e petitioner. Shri AV. Shridhar, Pane! Lawyerfdrthe State. With the consent of learn counsel for the parties, the petition is heard tinaily. This case pertains to grie ance arising on account of non-grant of retiral dues Learned couns i appearing for the petitioner on instructions submits that the m tter may be referred to the High Power Retirai Dues Committee This Court in W P No 46 212004 (Ba/math Iv‘andal Vs The State or Chhattlsgarh & others) and other connected matters directed the Committee to conSIder the atter or retriai dues as the disputed question of facts were invoived, The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19-06-2006 passed in WP.No.‘i§6‘i/2006 (Smt. Keja ai Chandrakar Vs, State Government of Chhaifisgarh and others), Va d order dated 13-3-2008 passed in MCC. No.105 of 2008 (State f Chhai'tisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Manda! and another). Thus, is petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order date 31“ January, 2008 passed in W.P.No.4642/2OD4 (Baijnath M ndal (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the partie . This petition is according disposed of in the same terms i.e., the ofnce of the Advocate Gener i is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of’i days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Thereafter, the Com ittee shall issue notice to the petitioner and officers concerned withi a further period of 15 days. The c—QF Committee shali consider and h affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner The petitioner “and the ofticers concerned may iiie additional documents if necessary _ The entire exercise inciuding petitioner, begcompleted Within receipt ofcopy of this order. AThe petitioner shall supply one compiete set of the petition to the State counsei as well as oounsel for the Accountant General for transferring the sameto the'Co Deepli i ‘ pass order, in accordance with iaw, after payment of retirai dues if any, to the a period or four months from the date of m ittee With the aforesaid obserJgtions, the petition is finaliy disposed off. t if ’5 : Sd/- nindra Mohan Shriv ‘ i ’ Judge ' a ast