IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 20TH MARCH 2007 / 29TH PHALGUNA 1928 Bail Appl..No. 1529 of 2007() ----------------------------- CRIME NO.449/06 OF CHINGAVANAM POLICE STATION : PETITIONER/ACCUSED ----------------------------------- 1. RAJEEV, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O RAJAN, KALLUTHARA HOUSE, S.PURAM P.O., KURICHY, CHANGANACHERRY, KOTTAYAM. 2. LINEESH, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.KUNJUNJUKUTTY, MATTATHIKADAVIL, S.PURAM P.O., KURICHY, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAISHANKAR RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANTS ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR, CHINGAVANAM POLICE STATION. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAI GEORGE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No. 1529 OF 2007 A ```````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 20th day of March, 2007 O R D E R Petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.449/06 of Chingavanam Police Station for offences punishable under sections 324 and 326 read with section 34 IPC, seek anticipatory bail. 2. This is the second application for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioners, who had along with accused Nos.3 and 4 sought anticipatory bail earlier by filing B.A.No.865/07. This court was not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The present attempt to seek anticipatory bail again by producing Annexure-A4 treatment certificate is nothing but an abuse of the process of this court. I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. This petition is accordingly dismissed. (V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE) aks