IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16121 of 2008 SANTOSH KUMAR THAKUR S/O BHOGNARAYAN THAKUR --- PETITIONER Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. PANKAJ KUMAR THAKUR SON OF PRAMESHWAR THAKUR -- OPP. PARTIES. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Kr. Jha, Advocate. For the O.P.No.2 : Mr. Ajay Kumar, Ray, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ----------- 05. 24.09.2010 Petitioner is the informant/complainant. He has approached this Court for cancellation of bail granted to the opposite party no.2 by order dated 31.01.2008 passed by a Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. no. 54468 of 2007 (Pankaj Kumar Thakur vs. The State of Bihar). It is stated that accused is mis-utilizing the privilege of bail by holding out threats. He draws attention of the Court to the application (Annexure 2) and submits that application was filed by the petitioner in the Court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Naugachhia which has been directed to be forwarded to the concerned police station for needful action. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, on the other hand, states that the opposite party has not indulged and shall not indulge in such activities. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the materials on record, this Court is not satisfied that a case for cancellation of bail has been made out. Petitioner is however at liberty to approach the learned Court below in seisin of the matter for appropriate relief if the situation so warrants. The application is dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)