1 CA 4954.2011 in FA 2223.2010 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4954 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2223 OF 2010 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.Sachin Deshmukh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.V.N.Upadhye, Advocate for the respondent. .......................... CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 20/04/2011 PER COURT : 1. This is an application for withdrawal of amount. Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lacs only ) have been deposited till date by the Insurance Company. But, only dispute revolves around the deductions which are made and the multiplier applied by the Tribunal. The Tribunal has applied the multiplier of 15. As per the learned counsel for the Insurance Company, the multiplier should not be more than 11. Apart from this fact, there is no other dispute between the parties. Even if the case of the Insurance Company is accepted, still under any circumstance, the present applicant can be entitled for the amount more than Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lacs only ). 2 CA 4954.2011 in FA 2223.2010 2. In the result, the application is allowed. The applicant is allowed to withdraw Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lacs only ) deposited by the Insurance Company on furnishing an undertaking that in the event the Appeal is allowed, he would deposit the said amount within the period of one ( 1 ) month. The question of withdrawal of other amount, if the Insurance Company deposits, would be considered on its own merits if an application for withdrawal of the same is filed. These observations are prima facie in nature. The Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ] KNP/CA 4954.2011 in FA 2223.2010