^Ssss£ss^^'ys"':'•"- ^s^. ^..••''•""" ...••"" fw*'*' .•••••*' ^^- \.--"' &a *' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.No.32-4-^ 2006 ^ICH Petitioner Respondents <* -^~ Pawan Kumar Sahu aged 45 years Son of Shri Bansi lal Sahu, Assistant Teacher, Middle School, Al Kanhar, Block ^ Mohala, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus 1. The State Government ofChhattishgarh, -- Through the Secretary, iFtba&'weltef^-DefiaFfcnent t\ D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ f'./' 2. Principal High School, Dangarh, T^i Block Mohala District Rajnandgaon o' % Petition under Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndia for the issuance of WKIT in the nature of Mandamus certiorari, Prohibition and for any other suitable writ or writs Order or orders, direction or direction XI-HC-78 *ll*lWl sh*lich 731 'ifWM^, Vn!\W , Rlcll+l^ ^^ ...2.^..^.j ^. &1^ 200 311^1 <<a<0 (yit^ai^iT) 3Ti^rwR-)i+ cTSTrsn^TsbHlch Bawe ^ g.RfRKHferan^r 5.7,2006 Shri R.S. Shrivastava, couns^l Miss Dipali Pandey, Panei \. advance copy. Heard both the counse!. By this writ petition, the petiti prohibited from stopping/recovering | paid to the petitioner. Learned counse! for the jncrements were granted to the quaiification of B. Ed. and now respondents may stop two advanc^ the amount aiready paid. So far no notice of recovery passed and the petitioner has filed apprehension. Therefore, this writ dismissed. However, as and whenl will be at liberty to approach appropri|ate +i<<f<-i'l(1-< •<itidT^Ts'<fl <R]t<i< ^ari^iTan^T for the petitioner. awyer for the State/respondents, on tioner has prayed that respondents be Ithe benefit of two advance incremente p^titioner submitted that two advance petitioner on account of acquiring ]the petitioner is apprehending that increments and also they recovered h|as been issued or any order has been [this petition mereiy on the ground of t petition is premature and same is cause of action arises, the petitioner Forum. L.C.Bhadoo Judge /-k