1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 274 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 648 OF 2004 Babulal K. Paliwal & Anr. ....Plaintiffs Versus Omprakash K. Jain & Ors. ....Defendants Mr. Denzil D’Mello, Advocate for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Biren Saraf i/b. Mr. G. C. Mohanty, Advocate for Defendant Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATE : 2ND FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C. : Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. Prayer (a) of the notice of motion is required to be granted in view of the observations of the Division Bench in order dated 23rd July, 2009 in Public Interest Litigation No. 136 of 2006. It is not disputed that the existing boundary wall constructed around the suit property require repairs. No prejudice will be caused to the Defendants if the Plaintiffs are permitted to repair the boundary wall around the suit property. In the above facts and circumstances, notice of motion is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Sd/- (R. V. MORE, J.)