FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4006 OF 2011 “Ranjana d/o. Ashruba Chavan Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. V.M Chate, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. D.R. Korde, AGP for respondent No.1 Mr. R.J. Nirmal, Advocate holding for Mr. P.P. More, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM :- D.B. BHOSALE & S.B. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE :- 15TH JUNE, 2011. PER COURT :- 1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the following reliefs :- “By issuing writ of certiorari or any other writ , order or directions of like nature, the list prepared by the respondent No.2 disqualifying the petitioner for the post of Anganwadi Karyakari at village Ladegaon, Tq. Kaij, Dist. Beed on the ground of over age may please be quashed and set aside . By issuing writ of mandamus or any other writ or directions of like nature, the respondent No.2 may please be directed to reconsider the application of the petitioner for the post of Anganwadi karyakarti at village Ladegaon, Tq. Kaij, Dist. Beed, in the light of G.R. Dated 16th June, 2001.” FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4006 OF 2011 “Ranjana d/o. Ashruba Chavan Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2 2] The petitioner is 44 years old. She claims that she is physically handicapped suffering 40 % disability. In support of her claim, she has also placed on record, a Disability Certificate issued by the Secretary, Arthopaedic Board, R.M.O.D.H., Beed. In view thereof, she further claims that her case is covered by the Govt. Resolution dated 16th June, 2001 ( Annexure `D' to the writ petition), which relaxes the age condition in case of physically handicapped persons. The petitioner contends that this Govt. Resolution had not been taken into consideration by the concerned authority while rejecting her claim for an appointment to the post of Anganwadi Karyakarti for village Ladegaon, Taluka Kaij, Dist. Beed. 3] Having considered the contentions urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Govt. Resolution, we are inclined to direct respondent No.2 to consider the petitioner's claim afresh, in the light of the Govt. Resolution dated 16th June, 2001, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The petitioner is directed to appear before respondent No.2, with a copy of this order, on 30th June, 2011. In the meanwhile, if respondent No.2 proceeds to hold interviews and make appointment of any other person as Anganwadi Karyakarti, same shall be subject to the FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4006 OF 2011 “Ranjana d/o. Ashruba Chavan Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 3 order that will be passed by respondent No.2, in pursuance of the directions issued by this order. In that event, respondent No.2 shall make it clear in the letter of appointment itself, that his/her appointment would be subject to the order, that will be passed in respect of petitioner's claim in pursuance of this order. With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. [S.B. DESHMUKH,J.] [D.B. BHOSALE, J.] grt/-