IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2011 / 30TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19808 of 2011(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SIKHILA.V.K, AGED 22 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF SIVADASAN, VELUTHEDATH KANDY, MALAPARAMBA POST, KOZHIKODE-673 009. BY ADV. SRI.JACOB ABRAHAM SMT.KOCHUMOL KODUVATH RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, COCHIN UNIVERSITY P.O., ERNAKULAM. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, COCHIN UNIVERSITY P.O., ERNAKULAM. ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,COCHI U FOR R1 & 2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.19808/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT 12.4.11 BEARING NO.50429 ISSUED BY THE ACCOUNTANT OF THE MODEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE, ERNAKULAM. EXT.P2: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE DUPLICATE RECEIPT DT 19.7.11 BEARING NO.A1/MISC/MEC/2011 ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL OF THE MODEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE, ERNAKULAM. EXT.P3: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE FIRST PAGE OF THE E-MAIL MESSAGE DT 29.6.11 RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER FROM THE MANAGER.CAMPUS@WIPRO.COM. EXT.P4: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE E-MAIL MESSAGE DATED 8.7.11 RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER FROM THE MANAGER.CAMPUS@WIPRO.COM. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 19808 OF 2011 (A) ===================== Dated this the 21st day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner was a student of Model Engineering College, Ernakulam and she completed the course Computer Science and Engineering. When the result of the 6th Semester examination was declared, she had failed in one paper viz., “Digital Signal Processing” and she failed in “Advanced Computer Networks” of the 7th semester. She applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 4 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp