1 D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 507/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Civil Special Appeal No. 507/2010 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9929/2010 Nitish Mathur & Another Versus State of Rajasthan & Others. 04.10.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kumar Jain,J. Hon'ble Mr. Prem Shanker Asopa,J. Mr. R.K. Mathur, for the appellants. Dr. Deepak Mathur, father of Appellant No. 2, Ms. Rachita Mathur present in person. Mr. Umesh Kumar Sharma and Mr. Sandeep Pathak, for the respondents. Mr. N.A. Naqvi, AAG, for the respondent-State. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. It is contended on behalf of the appellants that controversy involved in the present writ petition was whether there can be college-wise reservation in MBBS Course, when no such reservation is provided in PMT Booklet-2010 published by the respondents. According to him the reservation is available only in respect of State quota seats. He further contended that since impugned orders are not speaking one and reasons for disposing of the writ petition are not known, therefore, it will be better to remand the matter back to learned Single Bench for fresh adjudication of the matter on merits. 2 D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 507/2010 3. Learned Additional Advocate General concedes that impugned orders are not speaking orders and he has no objection in case the matter is remanded back to learned Single Bench for proper adjudication of the matter on merits. 4. We have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and we find force in the submission of learned counsel for the appellants. From the impugned orders it does not appear as to what was the controversy involved in the writ petition and what are the reasons for disposing of the writ petition. Impugned orders are non-speaking orders, therefore, we think it fit and proper to set aside the impugned orders and remand the matter back to learned Single Bench for fresh adjudication of the writ petition on merits according to law. 5. Consequently, special appeal is allowed. Impugned order dated 25.08.2010 which was subsequently modified vide order dated 26.08.2010, both are set aside. Matter is remanded back for fresh adjudication of the writ petition on merits to learned Single Bench in accordance with law. 6. So far as newly impleaded respondents namely Ajeet Singh Meena and Mukesh Kumar are concerned, we find that they are necessary 3 D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 507/2010 party, therefore, we direct learned counsel for the petitioners to file Amended Cause Title of the writ petition before learned Single Bench. Both the newly impleaded respondents are at liberty to file their reply to writ petition before next date. 7. List the matter before learned Single Bench for hearing on 19.10.2010. Parties are directed to appear before Single Bench on the aforesaid date. We request the learned Single Judge to decide the writ petition as early as possible in view of the urgency involved in the matter. (Prem Shanker Asopa),J. (Narendra Kumar Jain),J. Manoj, Item No.S.1.