1 Cri.W.P.No.169.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 169 OF 2010 [Inayatulla @ Kalim S/o Abdullah Khan Pathan Vs. The State of Maharashtra & another] Mr.Abhay R.Rathod , Advocate for the petitioner Mr. D.R.Korde, A.P.P. for the respondent/State Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders PER COURT : 1] Heard. 2] The petitioner is challenging the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, dated 11.02.2010, in Criminal Revision No. 24 of 2010 retaining the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ambajogai of issuance of process against the petitioners. The petitioner No.1’s wife lodged her complaint to the Court and narrated in detailed the incidents, depicting the petitioners’ cruel conduct towards her and her children. After examining the facts, the learned Additional Sessions Judge came to the conclusion that the material against the petitioners was sufficient enough for issuance of process. 2 Cri.W.P.No.169.10 3] The learned Advocate appearing for petitioner wants me to appreciate the fact that, though the complaint was lodged, so far medical evidence has not come on record. I am afraid, before issuance of process there is no need to examine the medical witness and to verify whether the injuries were noticed by the Medical Practitioner. If allegations are otherwise believable the process can be issued. There is no substance in the present petition. Hence, the Criminal Writ petition stands dismissed. Sd/- DT: 08.04.2010 [A.V.NIRGUDE,J.] MTK