IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.959 of 2009 MUKESH KUMAR PURI, son of Parasuram Puri, resident of village Sighasni, P.S. Baikunthpur, in the District of Gopalganj. . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj. 4. The Officer-in-charge, Thawe Police Station, Gopalganj. 5. Sunil Bharati, son of Hiralal Bharati 6. Sujit Bharati, son of Hiralal Bharati 7. Hiralal Bharati, son of Dhaneshwar Bharati 8. Navlakiya Devi, wife of Hiralal Bharati. Respondent nos. 5 to 8 are residents of village Chanabe, P.S. Thawe, in the District of Gopalganj. . . . . . Respondents. ----------- 4/ 27.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. In the instant writ application, the petitioner has prayed for fair investigation of Thawe P.S. case no. 77 of 2009 for the offence under Sections 304B, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4/5 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. No one appears for the petitioner. No one had appeared for the petitioner on 16.08.2010. Counsel for the State has filed counter affidavit stating therein that police has already filed requisition before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate for issuance of warrant of arrest against the accused persons and the investigation is kept pending against rest of the accused. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs that the Investigating officer of this case will take all steps to arrest the accused persons, who are involved in this case and evading their arrest. This Court further directs that the police would conclude the investigation against the other 2 accused persons within a reasonable time. It will be open for the informant to cooperate with the police regarding the accused persons, who are evading arrest. This application stands disposed. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)