CE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) 16/61 w.P. No ......... 2003 -*_ ($00? SiwEg ggmh é” PETITIONER SANTQSH KUMAR SHARMA ASSTT.GRADE 3, KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI (AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETTING COMMITTEE)‘ BILASPUR, DIST. BILASPUR. VERSUS RESPONDENTS (1) CHHATTISGARH STATE 6““ THROUGH PRICIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE , GOVERNMENT OF CHHATTISGARH, DKs ,MANTHRALAY BHAVAN, RAIPUR. (2)MANAGING DIRECTOR CHHATTISHGRAH I STATé AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD, PURANI GANJ MANDI PREMISES, RAIPUR. (3)3E‘CRETARY, KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITHI, BILASPUR, DIST. BILASPUR. \ryw / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI~HC-22 WW Wm 2003 The pefifioner by fhis pefh‘ion filed under 5ec‘Hon 226/227 ef i'he rhe order dwed 24.06.2003 by which ‘ pe‘i‘ifioner‘ on depufafion from Bilaspur and aisa fhe order dafed 26.06.2003 his dufies Lai- Bilaspur‘ in vioia‘i‘ion of fhe provisions af Secfien 30 of ih Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1972 (hereinafi'er referred To as ‘fhe Adhi yom'). The pe‘iifioner is presen‘l‘ly w rking as Assisiom‘ Grade-IE in ihe l hrishi Upaj Mandi Samii‘hi, Bilaspur an vide i'he impugned order he has been fransferred on depufo‘iion 1‘0 The Kris i Upoj Mandi Sami‘i‘hi, Jaijepur, Disii; Janjgir-Champa. The main grievance f fhe pefifioner is Thai- The fransfer has been made in violafion of Sub Secfion (4) of Section 3O of The Adhiniyom. The pei‘i‘i‘ioner has no? be n consuh‘ed in The maffer nor has fhe Krishi Upqj Mandi Sami‘ihi been con uli'ed.- The rafe 9f ihe depufai‘ion aiiowance has noi- been specifically me fioned in ihe order. Even ihough, by o laifer order if has been modified, ev n fhen in fhm‘ order also The ro’re of depu’ro‘i‘ion allowance has nof been spe ifically mentioned. The period of The depuiafion for which The pei'i‘iioner h been seni- on depuia‘i‘ion is also no? been meniioned. The pei'ii'ioner hos n T been given any chance i'o make his represen‘iofion before fhe Managing Di eci'or. Consfifu‘i‘ion of India has challenged respondenf N02 has Transferred fhe ' To Jaijepur' in JanjgirsChampa Disfric issued by respondeni' N63 relieving m m W T WWW maniam n f???W ms$~ m i emm l :1 .os.2oos Sri K. Ramon Nair, counsel for "he pei'ifioner. Sri Ranbir Singh Marhas, Govi'. Advocate for respondeni‘ Heard boi'h l l During The course of fhe argqmenfé, boTh frhz counsei agreed Tha‘f fhe pe'rifioner may make a demied represen‘rm‘ion raising his 'em‘ire grievances To The Mimcging Direc‘ur, Chhaf?isgnrh §qjya Krishi Vipanan Baard. Raipur, and 5ri Ranbir' Singh submi‘l‘s i'haf' his represem'afion will be censidered in an abjecfiva manner. :Having regard f0 The submissions made by boTh The counsel, iT is direcTed Tha‘i The peTiTioner shall ke a represenTaTion To The Managing Direci‘or, ChhaTTisgarh hqjya Krishi panan Baard, Raipur, wiThin a period of 15 days from Today and 0n recei ing The represenTaTionl The Managing Dir-ecTor shall decide The same in an bJecTive manner and while deciding The represenTaTion he shall be require To Take care af The prowsmns of Sub 5ecTIan (4} of $ecTian 30 of The Adhmlyam The Managing DirecTor is furTher direcTed To Take his decisi n wn‘hm four weeks from The daTe of receipT af The represenTaTion from The peTiTioner. Till Then, The Transfer of l The peTiTianer is sTayed. The wriT peTiTian is disposed f according ly. ConsequenTly, M.(W.)P.Na.17 9/2003, 1892/2003, 1920/2003 and I A No 538 /2003 alse sTand dispa d of i ParTies are enTITled far cerTi led copy of ThisOM ,/ new a i