1) Crl. Misc. No.M-17351 of 2011 (O&M) Virpal Kaur Vs. State of Punjab 2) Crl. Misc. No.M-19087 of 2011 (O&M) Ranjit Singh Vs. State of Punjab Present : Mr. A.S. Cheema, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M No.17351 of 2011). Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M No.19087 of 2011). Mr. S.S. Gill, D.A.G., Punjab. Mr. Daman Jeet, Advocate for the complainant. AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This order shall dispose of two petitions i.e. CRM-M Nos.17351 of 2011 & 19087 of 2011. CRM-M No.17351 of 2011 has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R. No.12 dated 23.03.2011 registered under Sections 304-B, 498-A, 34 IPC at Police Station Jaurkian, District Mansa. CRM-M No.19087 of 2011 has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R. No.12 dated 23.03.2011 registered under Sections 304-B, 498-A, 34 IPC at Police Station Jaurkian, District Mansa. In CRM-M No.17351 of 2011 the following contention was noticed on the last date of hearing:- Crl. Misc. No.M-17351 of 2011 (O&M) -2- “Learned counsel states that the petitioner is the Devrani who is separate in mess and residence and the father-in-law has been arrested and strangely no allegations have been levelled against the husband.” Learned Deputy Advocate General on instructions from Head Constable Gurtej Singh has accepted these factual assertions. Learned counsel for the complainant has however argued that they were living in the adjoining houses. Be that as it may, without going into the merit of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Ordered accordingly. Petitions stand disposed of. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of a connected case. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 01, 2011 JUDGE ashish