IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.793 of 2011 In (CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE 5897/2006) Bindeshwari Singh son of Late Deoraj Singh, resident of village- Araura, Police Station- Deo, District Aurangabad .......Appellant Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Additional Collector, Aurangabad 3. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Aurangabad 4. The Labour Enforcement Officer-cum- Labour Inspector, Deo Block, District Aurangabad 5. Bilash Bhuian son of Budhu Bhuian 6. Kaila Bhuian son of Antu Bhuian 7. Anil Bhuian son of Bilashi Bhuian 8. Munarik Bhuian son of Matuki Bhuian 9. Sanjay Bhuian son of Ram Janam Bhuian 10. Maina Bhuian son of Kameshwar Bhuian 11. Bigan Bhuian son of Kali Bhuian 12. Laxman Bhuian son of Kali Bhuian 13. Ramjee Bhuian son of Bhudhram Bhuian 14. Umesh Bhuian son of Mohan Bhuian 15. Naresh Bhuian son of Sahan Bhuian 16. Sonu Bhuian son of Dipan Bhuian 17. Mahadeo Bhuian son of Tater Bhuian 18. Shailendra Bhuian son of Sablal Bhuian 19. Satendra Bhuian son of Budhkai Bhuian 20. Ramesh Bhuian son of Sita Bhuian 21. Biran Bhuian son of Nanhu Bhuian 22. Kailash Bhuian son of Mohan Bhuian 23. Yodhan Bhuian son of Sukan Bhuian 24. Suresh Bhuian son of Mohan Bhuian 25. Baran Bhuian son of Budhram Bhuian 26. Santan Bhuian son of Sukan Bhuian 27. Ramjee Bhuian son of Santan Bhuian 28. Ashish Bhuian son of Santan Bhuian 29. Yogendra Bhuian son of Bilashi Bhuian 30. Jitendra Bhuian son of Nanhu Bhuian 31. Kamta Bhuian son of Jattu Bhuian 32. Gudari Bhuian son of Bala Bhuian, all Respondent nos. 5 to 32 are residents of village- Mathurapur, P.O. Araura, P.S. Deo, District Aurangabad 33. Amit Bhuian son of Nathun Bhuian, resident of village Amarpur, P.O. Araura, P.S. Deo, Distt. Aurangabad 34. Surendra Bhuian son of Sita Bhuian 35. Umesh Bhuian son of Sita Bhuia 36. Amrendra Bhuian son of Bilash Bhuian 2 37. Sheo Narayan Bhuian son of Bala Bhuian 38. Muneshwar Bhuian son of Mithu Bhuian 39. Ravindra Bhuian son of Ramchandra Bhuian 40. Jadu Bhuian son of Sahdeo Bhuian 41. Santan Bhuian son of Mossafir Bhuian 42. Yogi Bhuian son of Mosafir Bhuian 43. Ram Jatan Bhuian son of Krit Bhuian 44. Hari Bhuian son of Krit Bhuian 45. Raju Bhuian son of Muneshwar Bhuian 46. Bhaju Bhuian son of Muneshwar Bhuian 47. Mukhdeo Bhuian son of Kail Bhuian 48. Ganauri Bhuian son of Kail Bhuian 49. Ramesh Bhuian son of Kail Bhuian, all are resident of village - Mathurapur, P.O. Araura, P.S. Deo, District Aurangabad 50. Jivrakhan Bhuian son of Kallu Bhuian 51. Sita Bhuian son of Sahdeo Bhuian 52. Shailendra Bhuian son of Sahdeo Bhuian 53. Lalan Bhuian son of Laxmi Bhuian 54. Parvesh Bhuian son of Devi Bhuian 55. Sohrai Bhuian son of Manhu Bhuian 56. Jitendra Bhuian son of Manhu Bhuian 57. Ramlagan Bhuian son of Matuki Bhuian 58. Kameshwar Bhuian son of Matuki Bhuian 59. Sarju Bhuian son of Mukhlal Bhuian 60. Sheo Kumar Bhuian son of Mahesh Bhuian 61. Musafir Bhuian son of Kail Bhuian 62. Mahesh Bhuian son of Tater Bhuian 63. Sohrai Bhuian son of Bigan Bhuian 64. Ram Sewak Bhuian son of Yadunandan Bhuian 65. Tapeshwar Bhuian son of Ramlal Bhuian 66. Deonandan Bhuian son of Ramlal Bhuian 67. Naresh Bhuian son Sahdeo Bhuian 68. Nathun Bhuian son of Sahdeo Bhuian 69. Nageshwar Bhuian son of Laxmi Bhuian 70. Lalan Bhuian son of Ramdhani Bhuian 71. Babulal Chaudhary son of Raghuni Chaudhary 72. Pravesh Chaudhary son of Raghuni Chaudhary 73. Subedar Chaudhary son of Raghuni Chaudhary 74. Bailendra Chaudhary son of Raghuni Chaudhary 75. Ashok Bhuian son of Chhathu Bhuian 76. Shyamdeo Bhuian son of Chhathu Bhuian 77. Rukhi Bhuian son of Chhathu Bhuian 78. Kishmatiya Devi wife of Ashok Bhuian All are residents of village- Amarpur, P.O. Araura, Police Station Deo, District Aurangabad ........Respondents ---------------------------------- 2 12-08-2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and 3 perused the order of the writ court. Grievance of the appellant that some documents and registers were not called for and looked into has been considered by the writ court in paragraph- 4. We have found that there is nothing to infer that the appellant at any stage invoked the power of the authorities to call for or summon documents or registers. A summary proceeding under the Minimum Wages Act cannot be equated with a proceeding of full fledged Civil suit. Since the appellant did not ask for production of seized registers, the authorities cannot be put to any fault. We find no merit in this appeal. It is, accordingly, dismissed. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)