THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU C.C.No.653 of 2009 ORAL ORDER: This contempt case is filed complaining wilful disobedience on the part of the respondents in implementing the order passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.8845 of 2009 in W.P.No.6142 of 2009 dated 30.3.2009, whereunder the respondents were directed not to proceed further in any manner for encashing the demand drafts which were received from the respondents 3 and 4 herein on 26.3.2009 under Section 45-G of the ESI Act, 1948 towards the disputed contributions pertaining to the erstwhile unit of Yerraguntla, Kadapa. The respondents filed counter stating that the demand drafts were received in the clearing house in the forenoon of 30.3.2009, the date on which the interim order was passed, and the same were encashed. Whereas the learned counsel for petitioner states that there is some inconsistency in the statement made by respondents 1 and 2 and respondents 3 to 5. It is stated that the interim order dated 30.3.2009 was passed in the afternoon session at about 3.30 p.m., therefore it cannot be said that the respondents have committed contempt in encashing the demand drafts. Since the petitioner as well as respondents are Public Sector Undertakings, they have to work out their remedies in the pending writ petition. In view of the above, nothing survives in the contempt case for further adjudication. Therefore, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. ______________ C.V.RAMULU, J Date: 22.6.2010 DA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU C.C.No.653 of 2009 22.6.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU C.C.No.653 of 2009 Date: 22nd June, 2010 Between: Cement Corporation of India Ltd., Tandur, Ranga Reddy district, rep. by its Manager (Marketing). .. Petitioner And U.H. Rao, Regional Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation, Hyderabad, rep. by its Deputy Director & others. .. Respondents