K ^" IN THE HuiV'tt^B HICrH COURT OF:CHHAVnSGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W^tt B8ftCJ| (Contempt Case (Cl NO......L3.1...../2011) PETITIONER /'".^" ^f^ ^-^<r .^. ^ry ^y^ RESPONDENT CONTEMNOR Bahadur Singh S/o Late Jagmohan Singh Aged About 64 year R/o village Chhotte Atarmuda Tah. 85 District - Raigarh (C.G.) VER S U S ». Shri A. K. Ghrit^ahare Nazul Officer Raigarh Collectorate Raigarh,District - Raigarh (C.G.) CONTENPT CASE (Cl UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT '- ^ .<" i ..^X. '^Stw y^a^ ^ aiI^H'EBT'fe'IW wa sn^ss *t<iti Tumane 'S's^ •<{ww-i<, 'a-v^vw, ^diy^-t . , Cov^- Csy£-(C)t»,,W c^.'z^ ^ [^^•••••-••••••••••••"•••-^"-.••-•......•^ 200 SS^I TRHT (•^qf^^tTj ^ ^BIIW:'gftg 3ii4?r SB^ Hon'ble Shri Manindra Moh 07-09-2011 Shri Vineet Kumar Pandey, Shri Rakesh Jha, counsel fo Heard. This petition has been disobedience of order dated W.P.(C)No.831 of 2011, whereby direction to the Nazul Officer to preferablywithin a period of three copy of this order before the said ai In the reply filed by the res| the final orders were passed by Though, learned counsel order gppears to be backdatedi contention. In that view of the matter, matter. Rule is therefore dischargej Accordingly, the petition is f| cftT<rf<?T<ift'T tfi*i<rff ^f T§<£t'^t-^K ^aifinaii^r b Shrivastaya^J. (ounsel for the petitioner. the respondent/contemnor. |filed by the petitioner alleging willful 11-02-2011 passed by this Court in |the writ petition was disposed off with a lispose off the case as early as possible tionths from the date of filing of the certified lithority. icndent/contemnor, it has been stated that the| Nazul Officer on 04-05-201 1. >r the petitioner sought to argue that the there is no material to support such am not inclined to proceed further in the nally disposed off. Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge :inti^>ni8'ftiigi?TOii(,n5CTRiira—.,i.s/i<)()—2/2011—i,50,ooo. ^