$ENGLE F ? 10% IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAT’I‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.Nor‘.L § WM 9 /2006 / PETITIONER: x The Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation, through: Its Divisional Manager, Bilaspur . VERSUS Rajkumar Shastri, S/o. Shri Ramsanehi Shastri, R/o. Bhawani Bhawan, Chitranjan Marg New Sarkanda Bilaspur RESPONDENTS (1] X2] M.P. Road Transport Corporation (old MPSRTC), Habeeb Ganj, Bhopal (M. P.) Registrar,1ndustrialCourt Chhattisgarh, Raipnr Presiding office, Labour Court, Bilaspur RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE {V4 /227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / W mmm mmmm' agwm ' Q _,‘L,Satish K. Agnihotri Roshan/— _Judge XI-HC-78 EW,WW,W m ..w.t’. Wwwlm m zoo WW(W> WWW WWEWMA W Shli SamECr Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner, Three weeks’ fima is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects as pointed out by A.R. (J) in his note dated 2.8.2006, failing which the matter shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution. Sdl- ‘94 ‘ P.T.o. XI-HC-22 mam WW”) ‘ " S76 -7 m W5 wCPRMaLr/Dgi 200 m mam?! Wméa anéetmmm WW#WW mm aiataqmw l 08-01—2007: This W.P.(PR) No. 4014/2006 is treated as dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 06-09-2006. (For details note sheet part may kindly be seen.) Counsel be informed accordingly. Sd/- Ago) f DA. (100W) Kr