IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 6056 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: APRIL 22, 2009 Parshotam Kumar .....PETITIONER Versus State of Punjab and others ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL --- Present: Mr.L.S. Virk, Advocate, for the petitioner. .. SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. The petitioner has filed this petition for quashing the final merit list dated 16.8.2008 (Annexure P4) prepared for the post of Assistant Librarian by the Selection Committee on the basis of which respondent No.10 has been recommended and appointed. It is the case of the petitioner that respondent No.10 secured 54.50 marks whereas the petitioner secured 52.30 marks. It is further the case of the petitioner that respondent No.10 has been given some marks for experience on the basis of the experience certificate issued to her by Guru Teg Bahadur Art and Craft College, Samana i.e., respondent No.4. It is alleged that the said College was not affiliated to Punjab Technical Education Board at relevant time, therefore, her experience of the said College cannot be taken into consideration. In the petition, it has not been stated as to how many marks have been given to respondent No.10 on the basis of the said experience certificate. No averment has been made that the experience required for the said post should be only from an affiliated C.W.P. No. 6056 of 2009 -2- College. A disputed question of fact has also been raised that the alleged certificate is forged and fabricated. Totally a vague petition has been filed. No criteria has been disclosed indicating that some marks were to be given on the basis of the experience. In the entire petition, nothing has been disclosed as to how the selection of respondent No.10 on the said post is illegal and arbitrary and she is less meritorious than the petitioner. Thus, I do not find any ground to interfere in this petition and the same is hereby dismissed. April 22, 2009 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) vkg JUDGE