1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Revision Application No. 203/2010 [Raju Hansdas @ Hansaram Rangari Vs. State of Maharashtra] ................................................................................................................................................................... .. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................................... .. Shri R. H. Rawlani, Advocate for applicant. Shri B. M. Lonare, APP for non applicant/State. CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J. DATED : DECEMBER 07, 2010. Heard Shri R. H. Rawlani, learned counsel for the petitioner/accused and Shri Lonare, learned APP for State/respondent. Petitioner has filed this revision against the judgment and order dated 20.11.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 2nd Wardha in Criminal Appeal No. 25/2006 as also judgment and order dated 17.04.2006 passed by the learned J.M.F.C. Court no. 2 Pulgaon in Sum. Criminal Case No. 1388-A/2000. Applicant was convicted for commission of offence punishable under Section 354 I. P. C. 1860, and was sentenced to suffer R. I. for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- in default to suffer S. I. for one month. Against this judgment he preferred appeal which was dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 2nd Wardha. Admit. 2 Shri Lonare, learned APP waives service on behalf of the State/respondent. Call for record and proceedings. Criminal Application No. 300/2010: Heard Shri Rawlani, learned counsel for the petitioner/accused and Shri Lonare, learned APP for State/respondent. By this application petitioner has prayed for suspension of execution of sentence of two years R. I. and fine of Rs.500/- in default to undergo further imprisonment of one month awarded for the offence punishable under Section 354 of I. P. C. In the application it is averred that petitioner was on bail in the trial Court during the trial as also during the pendency of the appeal. He had deposited fine amount of Rs.500/-. In view of this petitioner/accused shall be released on same bail as ordered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 2nd Wardha by executing fresh bail bonds. Hamdast permitted. Application is disposed of. JUDGE svk