IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21669 of 2010 1. RAMASHISH MAHTO, S/o Late Turanti Mahto @ Turan Mahto. 2. Arjun Prasad, S/o Ram Narain Singh. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 06.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. By order dated 31.03.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 10096 of 2010 the petitioners were granted bail on condition that they would give an affidavit that they are not accused in any other case. It has been submitted that in fact for the same occurrence two other cases were instituted besides the present one and therefore the affidavit could not be given. Considering the merits of the case is not effected by the pendency of the two other cases instituted for the same occurrence, let the petitioners, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection 2 with Khanpur P.S. Case No. 29 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)