IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 9TH OCTOBER 2009 / 17TH ASWINA 1931 WP(C).No. 881 of 2007(E) ------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------ K. SARASWATHY, W/O.C.VELAYUDHAN, SARASWATHY BHAVAN, VENGODE P.O., VATTAPPARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-28. BY ADV. SRI.A.B.MOHANAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- THE MANAGER, CORPORATION BANK, M.C. ROAD, NALANCHIRA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-15. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.881/07 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DT 31.8.06 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER AND OTHERS. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF ADVOCATE NOTICE DT 3.10.2006 ISSUED TO THE RESPONDENT IN REPLY TO EXT.P1. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 881 OF 2007 (E) ===================== Dated this the 9th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T The challenge in this writ petition was against Ext.P1, a notice issued under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. 2. At the stage of admission, this Court had granted stay for six weeks, which was not extended thereafter. Even notice sent also is not seen returned after service and the petitioner has not taken any steps to get the said defect cured. Having regard to the above, I do not think there is any substance in this writ petition to be considered on merits. Writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp