^ r\ \ ,,sA./ "r3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.^ 0) U OF 2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^ .'<•;••::>'. ^'.•'•;yy/"2- ^ ^•',-^-" •V ^ Rajendra Kumar Gilahare, S/o. Shri Laklian Lal GUahare, Aged about 39 years, R/o. Village Purena, Post Ravigram, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS / 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Mining, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director, Departuient of Minmg, "Sonakhan Bhawan, Ring Road No.l, Village Purena, Post Ravigram, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. The CoUector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Mining Officer, Department of Mining, Collectorate Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) / 5. Shri Jalandhar Prasad Verma, Assistant Grade-III, Department of Mining, Collectorate Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/2270FTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 ^^ ^[f^^, ^Tll^^Ko, ?c<<1W^< 29 3-TI^T'^T "^N^^n^T ^Hicn <ifia NI*l<?1T5b^(cb 3TI^) xra^R. t ^ .3.J'!'"..IB^ 'ir""Wt 200 fc|^^ 2-12-2005 -: ' . • Shri Devesh Chandra vern|a Shri Sandeep Dubey, Govtt Panei Lawyer for the State. AppVcation for urgent Meard. Learned counse! for the was worldng as Assistant Grade|c -further submits that the petition^r 9-11-2005-(Annexure-P/2) | ban period. He aiso submits (Annexure-P/1) respondent No.5 Bilaspur, but not reiieved. Shriv^r transfer order of respondent No| transferred-ln h.ls piace witho|jt Learned counsei for the $t as to whether prior approvai of| However, iearned State counsei | directed to make representation jf such representation is flled t| declded on its ovm merits. Learned counsei for the proposai made by learned Havlng considered and wltr tnerits ofthecase,. In the opinion| sen/ed If a direction is given tc< cb{^I<yt<fll TTP:F^f ^ 'fe^ <fa-^l< ^T3^|H3?n^F i, counsei for the petitioner. AdVocate and Shri Vivek Sharma, hearfrig isaiiovred. p^titioner submits that the petitioner -ili in the Mining Departrnent He has been transferred vide order |from Raipur to Bilaspur during the Ithat vide order dated 25-8-2005 was transferred from Raipur.to Vferma submits that ail of sudden the j5 was modified and the petitioner fvitho(Jt assigning any reason. tate is not in a positlon to point out i Chief Minister is obtained or not. Isubmits that the petitioner may be ^efore the competent authority and ie same shaii be consldered . and Ipetitioner agrees to the aforesala tounsei. }hout;expressing -any opinion cn the |of this Court, ends of justice wili be the petitioner to make a detaiied h [•^^fm ~T XI-HC-22 'STI^T^T R^rti<=b 3?I^T sb^iicb ^i^a Qowrl - (- ^ ^ '^' ^ -s^ ^||^ld4, ^Tt1<i^<o, fa<nwy 30 43<cb ^n | o-s mH^l ^bHlct^ "W^ 200 ^^T' representation ralsmg his grievan^ of respondents aiongwith a copy a period of two weeks from today| filed, the competent authority o? sarne.on its own merits in accordfence preferably within a period .of two representatlon. it is made clear tljiat contlnue cn his present pia.ee'o| decided. vv'ith the -aforesaid obs disposed of. Consequentiy, ivl.Cw\).J:f. aisposea OT. ^ . Certified copy as per rujes.l |es before the competent aythority (^f the petition and this order within jana on such representatlon 'belng jthe respondents shail decide the .with law as.eariy as possibie Inonths-tfom'the date of receipt of the petitioner wiii be aliowed to posting tiii the representation is tervations, thls petltion • stands F.No.4704/2005 aiso stands <=bi^fo^l't Ht*l<A ^ fs^dl <Rst^K ^'srf^pT^i^r Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^^fe^