C.^: '^- <3^S^ INTHE HIGH CQURT QF CHHATT1SGARH AT BILASPUR WRI'LPETITION_No.^9/^ /2006 . 1. Petitioners ,.^y ^^%z/ °A^<^- ^®?" -to' < .^^' ^ r- cp 0<S7 i^L^ \[}y r Nand Kuiaar Sharma S/o Late Khajana Lal Sharma, Aged about 42 years, Asst. Teacher, Moahgaon, Block - Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 2. Lalaram Sahu, S/o Ramadhin, Aged about 40 years, Assistant Teacher, Prathmik Shala Newariguda, Block ^ Kawardha, Dist : Kabirdham-(C.G.) Tirtheshwar Prasad Tiwari, S/o Yogeshwar Prasad Tiwari, Aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher, Middle School, Shakti Ward, Block - Kawardha, Dist: Kabirdham-(C.G.). Narayanlal Markam, S/o Bhaiyalal Markam, Aged about 40 years, Assistant Teacher, Middle School Jenda, Block - Kawardha, Dist : Kabirdham-(C.G.) Sanjay Kumar Shrivastava S/o Shri R.K. Shrivastava, Aged about 40 years, Assistant Teacher, Middle School Rangakharkurde, Block - Kawarulia, Dist : Kabirdham-(C.G.) Santosh Kumar Pandey, S/o Shri Bhrigu Nandan Prasad Pandey, Aged about 41 years, Assistant Teacher Middle School, Regakharkhurd, Block - Kawardha, Dist : Kabirdham-fC.G.) (^ (2) 7. Prakash Gui Goswanii S/o Milan Giri Goswami, Aged about 41 years, Assistant Teacher, Goverrunent School Sonpuri (Rani), Block - Kawardha, Dist: Kabirdham-(C.G.) Versus Respondent ftNA^ fs->.?». / 2. . y State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary School Education Departaent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Kabirdham (C.G.) Block Education OfEcer Block - Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 1 XI-HC-22 IT*)WI sfi*ir«») 7S •^mwf, ®t(lu'i<o,firiwy ^..^c-,,^^ R'b'd an^rw R-f14> 3(1^51 !*i>ii»sfeT sn^r BOIW afer *i<itff41-i tfi«<CTTfftecA<(;ii<^i< ^iSll^T 3(1^1 ^ ^,^ 29.11.2006 Shri t>eepak Jain, Smt Anju Ahuja, &y 64 Heard. It is not dispu-ted by Administrative Tribunal in reached its finality. Having considered ar^ both the parties ond withou-1 the case. it is directed represen-tation along with c\ Authority »vittiina period of shall decide that representat of 30 days from •the dat^ considering alt the points •the order possed by thej OANo.1452/1998. With the aforesaid cou^sel for the petitioners. for the State/respondents. he State that the order passed by -the No.1452/1998 dated 31.01.2000 has OA ^uments advancad by leamed counsel for expressing any opinion on the merit of ^hat petitioners may submit detailed ^py of this petition to the Competent (ane month from today; and who, in turn on in an objective manner wilhin a period of receipt of representation after ^ed by the petitioners and Ihe impact of Tribunal dated 31.01.2000 in tiie rai^ed dir^ction, the petition stands dispo^sd of. —*^--••^ ._.'..-.— r—" • • •• - •- Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge (<f^y^r)