IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47874 of 2008 1. NEPALNI DEVI 2. SONIYA KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 18/12/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a complaint case, sent for investigation under Section-156(3) Cr.P.C., under Sections- 307, 365 and 323/34 of I.P.C. The defense is of false implication belatedly and that petitioner No.2 is an unmarried girl. On the previous occasion, this Court from the impugned order of rejection had noticed that during investigation the informant and the victim had stated that the victim was kept in the house of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioner had taken an adjournment to file an affidavit that the informant and the victim had made no such statement subsequently. No such affidavit has been filed. The victim of abduction was a five year old child. He is, however, stated to have been recovered subsequently from the well. In the facts and circumstances, this Court is not persuaded that the present is a fit case for the privilege of anticipatory bail. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail shall be 2 considered by the court below on its own merits, without being prejudiced by the present order of rejection. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)