1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. SECOND APPEAL No.142 of 2006. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, office Memoranda of Coram Court's or Judge's appearances, Court's orders or directions order and Registrar's order. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= CORAM: C.L.PANGARKAR,J. DATE : 19th December, 2006. 1. Heard Mr.K.S.Narwade, the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. The respondent/plaintiff had instituted a suit for partition and separate possession of one half share in plot. 3. The defendant had resisted the suit. The trial court, upon consideration of the evidence, found that the plaintiff had one half share in the suit property. The defendant being aggrieved by that had preferred an appeal before the 1st Ad hoc Additional District Judge, Pusad, which came to be dismissed. 4. I have gone through the judgment of the trial court as well as the first appellate court. There are concurrent finding of facts. I see no perversity in the appreciation of the evidence and no substantial 2 question of law is involved in the matter. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine. JUDGE pzc