FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO. 25696 OF 2011 IN REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 2011 “Shirish Suryakant Shirsathe Vs. Mangesh Dinkarrao Salunkhe” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. K.C. Sant, Advocate for petitioner Mr. Bhausaheb S. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondents. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE :- 13th OCTOBER, 2011 1] All these questions, including bias/misconduct of the Arbitrator can be very well raised in an appeal under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, for setting aside the award. In that view of the matter, no error apparent on the face of the record is noticed to invoke the review jurisdiction. 2] In the result, review application is rejected. [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/- FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO. 25696 OF 2011 IN REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 2011 “Shirish Suryakant Shirsathe Vs. Mangesh Dinkarrao Salunkhe” Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2