IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2011 / 11TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 14730 of 2011(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- C.V.PAPPACHAN @ OUSEPH, CHITTINAPPILLY KARUKUTTY, ALUVA. BY ADV. MR. P.RAMAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, KOCHI - 30. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, ALUVA - 683 101. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P. NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P (C) No. 14730 of 2011 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 1st June , 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court with the grievance that the boundaries of the petitioner's property are to be clearly demarcated by the concerned respondent in tune with the contents of Ext. P1 conveyance deed and that the Ext. P2 request preferred by the petitioner before the first respondent in this regard is still to be acted upon, which made the petitioner to file this writ petition. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well, who, with reference to the materials on record, submits that, the representation preferred by the petitioner before the first respondent ought to have been filed before the 2nd respondent / Revenue authority, who is the competent authority to consider the grievance. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a copy of Ext. P2 has already been forwarded to the second respondent and the petitioner is ready and willing file a fresh representation before the said respondent, pointing out all the facts and figures, 4. In the said circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of, relegating the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the second W.P. (C) No. 14730 of 2011 : 2 : respondent for redressal of his grievance within one month; on which event the same shall be considered and appropriate orders shall be passed by the second respondent, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of such representation. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for further steps. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE kmd