IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. APP (DB) No.302 of 2010 SHIV JI SAH & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------- 03. 04.05.2010 We find a conflict in the judgment and order of sentence which is passed in the main record of Sessions Trial No. 352 of 2007. The maximum sentence, which has been inflicted upon the appellants, is that under Section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code i.e. rigorous imprisonment for 8 years. There are other sentences passed under Sections 498A and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. While ordering on the sentences to as to how the sentences were to be served out, the learned Judge appears writing “all the sentences of both the convicts will not concurrently”. It creates a great confusion as to what could ultimately be its import. As such, we consulted the order of sentence which was passed in Session Trial No. 352 of 2007 and that indicates that the learned trial judge directed the sentences to run concurrently. We as such, direct the Stamp Reporter to make fresh report on this appeal for appropriate listing of the same before the appropriate Bench. The report must be made within one week. Rajeev/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.) (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)