IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 377 of 1986 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- HEIRS OF SUKHABHAI M RANA- KANUBHAI SUKHABHAI RANA Versus UGARSEN SHAMBHUPRASAD -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR BHUPENDRA SHELAT for Petitioners Nos. 1-3 ( Petitioners served ) MR JV DESAI for the Respondent absent. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT Date of decision: 17/09/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT The petitioners herein were represented by the learned advocate late Mr.Bhupendra Shelat. On the demise of the learned advocate Mr.Bhupendra Shelat due notice was given to each of the petitioners. It is reported that all the petitioners have been duly served in the month of November, 1998 or thereabout. However, neither of the petitioners has entered appearance till the date. Besides, under order dated 21st December, 1992, this Court (Coram: N.J.Pandya, J. as he then was) has recorded that the respondent has died. It may, however, be noted that the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased respondent have not been brought on the records. In above view of the matter, the Revision Application is dismissed for non-prosecution. Rule is discharged. ( Ms. R.M. Doshit, J. ) /sakkaf