IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH FAO No. 195 of 1993(O&M) Date of decision: May 15, 2012 Gurmail Singh ....... Appellant Versus Mohinder Singh and others ........ Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Aseem Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate for the applicant. **** K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Notice of the application has been served to the appellant but there is no appearance on his behalf. The application is for correction of an arithmetic mistake in assessing the total compensation. The total compensation comes to `4,42,500, whereas in the impugned judgment the aggregate has been worked out at `5,27,500/-. I find that to be an arithmetic mistake as sought for in the application. 2. The enhancement ordered by this Court through the judgment dated 22.12.2010 shall stand modified and be read as `4,42,500/- instead of `5,27,500/-. 3. The application for review is allowed as above. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE May 15, 2012 archana