Versus Respondents 1. 5. Recovery Officer, (Do—operative Societies, Durg. (Writ Patition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) E HIGH CGURT OF CHHATTESGARH : BILASPUR Writ Petition (Ci No. 3148 of2009 Petitioner J. P. Singh, S/o Shame Singh, aged about 63 yearS, RIO Quarter No. 6—A, Street No. 3‘2, Sector — 5, Bhilai Nagar, Durg (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretaly, (Io—operative Societies and Small Indushies, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Smrh'i Gn'h Nirman Sahkan' Sanstha Maxyadit Smriti Nagar, Bhilai Durg (C.G.) through Admmistrator/ President. 3. Deputy Registrar, Co—operative Societies, Durg (C.G.) 4. Joint Registrar, Co—operative Societies, Chhatu'sgarh, Raipur. (SB: Hon’bie Shn' Satish K. Agnihom' J.) 4&5. Shri T. K. Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. ORDERioraE) (Passed on this 18th day of August, 2009) Heard. Leained counsel appearing for the petiu'oner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition on men'ts at this stage. However, the respondent—authority may be directed to consider and decide the pending application dated 8.4.2008 (Anhexure R116), in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the respondents] State submits that if the application (Annexure P/ 6) is pending, the same would be considered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a periodof six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I g/ Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the respondents No. l, 3, Thalcu: