IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 15179 of 2008 Between: P.Lakshmi Narayana, S/o. Ramappa,Hindu, Nadimipalli Village, Narpala Mandal, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND The Revenue Divisional officer, Anantapur, Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in not disposing of the enquiry pending before him in Proceedings Rc.D1- CS/414/206/2006 dated 7-3-2006 without passing orders on enquiry is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and consequentially set aside the order of suspension in Proceedings Rc.D1- CS/414/206/2006 dated 7-3-2006 and pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO :15179 of 2008 ORDER: The singular grievance in the writ petition is that the respondent has failed to conclude the enquiry and pass final orders therein in respect of the allegations which led to the suspension of his authorization by an order of the respondent dated 7.3.2006, in respect of a fair price shop in Nadimipalli Village, Narpala Mandal, Anantapur Division and District. It is now represented by the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing on behalf of the respondent and this fact is also stated in the counter affidavit filed by the respondent, that final orders have been passed on 19.7.2008 cancelling the authorization of the petitioner. In the light of the above development, the grievance in the writ petition does not subsist. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. It is however open for the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedies against the order of cancellation dated 19-7-2008 passed by the respondent. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J DATE: 25th July, 2008 pnb