IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 5TH MARCH 2009 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 31759 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- VINOD KUMAR.R. VILAYIL VEEDU, KUTTICHIRA, T.K.M.C. P.O., KOLLAM, WIRE MAN, TRAINEE. BY ADV. SRI.VINOY VARGHESE KALLUMOOTTILL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF TRAINING THYCADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. PRINCIPAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE CHANTHANATHOPPU, KOLLAM. Addl. 3. SECRETARY, STATE COUNCIL FOR VOCATIONAL TRAINING, (ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF TRAINING) THYCADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. SECRETARY, NATIONAL CUNCIL FOR VOCATIONAL TRAINING(NCVT), THYCADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (Addl. R3 to R5 impleaded as per order in I.A. NO.2446/09 dated 5.3.2009) GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR. M.A. ASIF THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX Ext.P1. True copy of the order in CMP.o.33498/08 in O.P.No.19654/02 Ext.P2. True copy of the intimation to the 2nd respondent allowing the trainees having 65% attendance. Ext.P3. True copy of the judgment in O.P.No.19654/02 Ext.P4. True copy of the judgment in O.P.No.22140/01. Ext.P5. True copy of the reply sent by the Ist respondent to the petitioner on a complaint filed before the Chief Minister's public grievances redressal Cell. // true copy // P.A to Judge. ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ----------------------- W.P.(C).No.31759 OF 2008 ------------------------ Dated this the 5th day of March, 2009. JUDGMENT Petitioner was a trainee in Wireman Trade under the 2nd respondent . He appeared for the examination in 2002 but the results were not declared. There upon a writ petition was filed before this court as WP(c).No.19654/02, in which the petitioner herein was the 8th petitioner. That writ petition was disposed of by Ext.P3 judgment directing the respondents therein to declare the results of the petitioner who have secure at least 65% attendance after taking into account the attendance gained in the second round of attending the course. It is stated that in pursuance to Ext.P3, results have been declared but however the certificates of the petitioner have not been issued. It is with that grievance this writ petition was filed seeking appropriate orders for issuance of the certificate. WP(c).No.31759/08 /2/ 2. The respondents have no case that declaration of results in pursuance to Ext.P3 judgment was not effected . If that be so, there is no reason why the certificate of the petitioner shall not be issued by the respondents. Therefore the writ petition is disposed of directing the additional respondents 3 and 4 to issue the certificates of the petitioner. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of production of a copy of the judgment. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WP(c).No.31759/08 /2/