IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25654 of 2008 1. NAGENDRA SAHNI, S/o. Laxuman Sahni, 2. Lal Mohan Bhagat, S/o. Ram Bahadur Bhagat, Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 08. 13.09.2010 Heard. The case is under Sections 395 & 397 of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the Explosive Substance Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the F.I.R. was lodged against unknown. Further submission is that in this case the petitioners were never put on any T.I.P. nor there has been any recovery from their possession. It is also submitted that the bail prayer of the petitioners was earlier rejected by the learned 5th Addl. Sessions Judge, Motihari on the ground that in para-23 of the case- diary one co-accused (Basudeo Sahni) named the petitioners as his associates in the commission of the crime. Learned counsel further submits that the confessional statement of co-accused has not led to recovery of any incriminating material from the petitioners, who have also been put on any T.I.P. Learned Addl. P.P. does not point out any 2 other material against the petitioners. In the facts and circumstances, petitioners namely, Nagendra Sahni and Lal Mohan Bhagat are admitted to bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri P.R.K. Singh, J.M. 1st Class, Sikrahana at Motihari. in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No.54 of 2006. Mkr. (C.M. Prasad, J.)