o. 5~,\QD ^\. IN THE HIGH COURT OF Jiy^I<£ATBRSGHHATTISGARH •AT.:SIIASWI :.:'.:' •::/ • ' '. W.P.NQ..' ^-^>2^-f200S PET1T10NER RESeQNaWTS ^: ^ --K: ^yy •^^ €^^ ^^^ Kailash Chandra, S/o Suritram y-^) Sahu, , Aged ahovt 34 ; £? y^ars, R/o Village Silyrari, TaK. Sarangarh, Disti-ict— Ralgarh f00) VSXSS& -&tBtit lial Yadav 8/0 Dularu Vaday, R/o ViUage Bataupali,Tahsil : Sarangarh, District- RaigarH (CG). A.K. Jaiswal, Lecturer, Govt. Higher Secondary' Sehool Kotra.m./jE't'esidtng Qfficer, Grani Panch.ayEtt, Satuapali (A),, Tahsil Sarangarh, Districf- Raigarh (C'G). Elecfion Officer, Gram Pahchayat ^ESleBlaflR Blook SBraogarh, Ta)isil Saral-lgarh, Distnct-RaIgarh (CO). The Sub Divisional OITiccr, (Reyenue) /Prescribed Authnrity; Eleetion Tribunal' Sarangarh, District-Raigarh tGG). WRIT IPayriTlONUNiaER^rittGLE; 226/227 OFTHE CONSTrFU'TBO 3G>FINDIA ,-f BN rl « 1. 2. Particutarsoi'^tiel'el.itioners: As stated above m the cause title. Particulars ofti'ie Saabondents: ^S8;gtate<i'.Sbi3^®slEitKe::<:a.use^itle. tR g B^ '"Sft s • @»E., W :^S,.iiS»^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 4632 OF 2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Kailash Chandra Versus Amrit Lal Yadav & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'bfe Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri P.R.Patankar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State. QRDER (Passed on this 13 day of December, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that with the passage of time, nottiing survives in this petitiori for adjudication and, as such, the petition has become infructuous. 2. No objection from otherside. i 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous. Sd/- satishjK.Agnihotri Judge ijia ilStlOl: !tT lf^'