^V^J^- ^ S.B. (Service Matterl IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATFISGARH) WRIT PETITION (SINO. 332-/2010. SIN6LE BENCH PETITIONER: Habil Tu-key, son of Lachu Tirkey, aged about 41 years, working as Asst. Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Saskoba, Block Dharamjaigarh, Distorict Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. versus Respondents €/^' ^•-y^y ,<' .^^ ^i^' ^••''^\y ./ y^u/ ...'^ (k/ ^ ^.,r 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribal welfare Departnient Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 4. Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury Raigarh, Chhattisgarh WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2260F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA T^T ^NKTI^, ^xi1<ri^<o, i^cni^^< r^r^^az^(& ^. <irodT »>*<ict» "^ 200 ^^t ^q^^ (^qt^^T) ?p^9 "^ Fw^ ^ff 3T^T »»*iw r -Y. ^: ^riw^rfiFcy 3?i^y SB : Hon'ble Shri ManjndraAlohaiiJlhrivastava^J, 23-06-2010 Shri C. Jayant K. Rao, counself^ Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lav^ advance copy. " Heard. Learned oounsel appearing fc|r petitioner is entitted to benefit of two he having passed B.Ed. examjnation oost. It is submjtted that the issue inv| longer res Integra and the same has ^ Supreme Court jn the case of As/?a 2009 (1!1) MPJR(SC)59, !t is further ] taken a sjmilar view in his orde^ W.P.(S)No. 6257 of 2008. Learned attention of this Court to order dated No.124 of2009, v^erein relying upon in the case of Asha Saxena (supra) an^ another Writ Appeal No.87/2009, consideration of the case for grant o\ circuiar dated 21-09-1974 issued by tl verification ofthe facts pieaded in the p| Learned oounsel for the petitioner would a!so be considered cn cbNf^^ft'1 'W^f ^f 1^^ T^^R ^F 3TfOT ^TI^T ^ ?r the petitioner ^er for the State/respondents on the petitioner submits that the ^dvanoe increments on account of t5ef6re his appointment at his own [olved in the present petition js no |een finally deoided by the Honlb!e ^axena vs. State of M.P. & Ors., ^ubmitted that this Court has aiso dated 06-02-2009 passed in for the petitioner further draws 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal -judgment ofthe Supreme Court |j the order passed by this Court in couhsel tHe lirections have been issued for <Ste two advanoe increments as per •je State of Madhya Pradesh, after ^tition. respohdents submits that oase of the }he same iines. /010—1,00,000. ^— y ;C—78 *<i*icfir (»»*ii<s»» 's^r r^i^i<n^, ^ti1^<i<o, f®t<ni^^< ^_.^f..&5.^.^1^?^L2 •v;.1 •^200 ^V^ TT^T°F (l?^^) ^TT^T^FT ^i<=h '<T8H 3?IT^T ffi^W ^TTW^nW^T ^ \-- Tumane In view of the statemenl disposed of with a direction to th€ decide the clalm of the petitioner per circular dated 21-09-1974 iss after verjfication ofthe faots piead weeks from today. CM<<t<n<fli ^nroff ^f f^1^ <F3i<^i< '^'^tfiwsn^T made above, this petition is finaliy respondent authorities to consider and for grant of two advanoe increments as ^ued by the State of Madhya Pradesh, ed in the petition within a period of eight Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge