HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.31448 of 2011 Date: 29.11.2011 Between: Dunnala Sambasiva Rao ..... Petitioner AND The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Authority-cum-Additional Agent to Government, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District and another. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri G.Nagaraju Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2: AGP for Social Welfare The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2 in seeking to dispossess the petitioner from the extent of Ac.2-29 guntas of land in Survey No.138(A)/1429 of Manguru Town and Mandal, Khammam District, without following due process of law as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner suffered ejectment orders, dated 25.01.2007 in L.T.R. Case Nos.10/2006/MGR & 323/2006/MGR. Questioning the said orders, the petitioner filed C.M.A.No.48 of 2008 before respondent No.1. In I.A.No.68 of 2008, respondent No.1 by order, dated 28.05.2008, has stayed the ejectment orders for a period of four months from the date of issue of the order. It is the pleaded case of the petitioner that subsequently he has filed a memo on 25.09.2008 for extension of interim order and that the same is pending and no order has been passed thereon. The grievance of the petitioner is that while the application for extension of the interim order as well as the C.M.A. are pending, respondent No.2 has been seeking to dispossess him and handover possession to respondent No.3. So long as the ejectment orders are not stayed, respondent No.2 is entitled to evict the petitioner, of course, by following due process of law. Inasmuch as the C.M.A. is pending before respondent No.1 against the ejectment orders, it would be in the interest of justice that respondent No.1 dispose of the appeal, if not already done, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the petitioner moves the application for extension of interim order in the meantime, respondent No.1 shall also consider the same and pass appropriate order. Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.39026 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. __________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 29th November 2011 DR