S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7300/2009 Bhupesh Garg Vs. Union of India & Anr. Date of Order :: 12.07.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Rohitash Singh Rathore, for the petitioner. ... This petition for writ is preferred to challenge the information provided by the Senior Divisional Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited with regard to cancellation of petroleum product outlet dealership said to be granted to the petitioner at location No.106, Mohangarh. From the perusal of the averments contained in the petition, it appears that on 27.10.2005 the respondent- petroleum company invited applications for dealership and in pursuant thereto, application was submitted by the petitioner. The petitioner was called to face interview but as a matter of fact no process of selection as such was convened. Subsequently proposal for establishing a retail outlet at Location No.106, Mohangarh was cancelled and on asking, necessary information in this regard was given on 2.12.2006. While giving such information, it was made clear to the petitioner that if he is having any grievance, he may approach to the Executive Director, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Mumbai. From the averments contained in the petition for writ, it does not reveal that the petitioner ever approached to the Executive Director of the petroleum company. Besides this, mere inviting applications for grant of retail outlet dealership and calling for interview does not create any right in favour of the petitioner, as such, the claim of made in this petition for writ for the grant of retail outlet to the petitioner is absolutely ill- founded. The petition for writ is, therefore, dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR), J. Sanjay/-