IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16117 of 2011 SUBODH YADAV @ SURESH KUMAR @ SURESH YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21.06.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and Mr. Parmanand Pd. Singh learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The specific accusation of assault is against Rajeshwar Yadav and Vijay Yadav. Though the petitioner was named in the F. I. R. but it appears that he was not charge sheeted by the police but differing with the same cognizance has been taken on 31.03.2009. It is further submitted that several accused persons have been granted anticipatory and regular bail. Considering the fact that accusation was found false by the police during investigation, let the petitioner, above 2 named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No. 14 of 2005 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Fast Track Court No. 3, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner defaults for three consecutive dates during trial. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)