a. Sifii3i©H®i1©i1 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR IC.6.) W.P. (S) No. 363'^ of 2011 PETTTEONER RESPON&ENTS /yly\ ,y^/.^.^\^l &aR<st[s.»r.] i "^.^y f^" Kamal Sai, S/o Puse Ram, aged about 50 years, Headmaster, 6ovt. Pnmary School, Aara, Block- Sitapur, Distt.- Surguja (C.6.) VERSUS : .1. State of Chhattisgarh Through-The Secretary, Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) c" 2. District Education Officer, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block Sitapur, Distt. -Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETETEON UNOER ARTECLE 226^^^^THE CONSTrrUTION OF INQIA FOR ISSUANC^OF_WRIT OR MANDAMUS/DIRECTION OF OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT. 01. PAKTLCULARS ABOUT THE PETETEONER^ As mentioned above in the cause title. 02. PaRTCCULARS ABOUT THE RESPONbENTS ; As mentioned above in the cause title. 3. PARTCCULARS OF THE OR&ER AGAWST WHICH THE PETETION IS BEIN6 MAE)E : s 7L ^slSSltSS^-ai-'^t^ ^'.A^^ V-' x HHSH COUBT OF> CaiHATnSQAIlH AT BaASPini 8Bj HCTFB!^ 8HRI JWSTICTi ntTHNKKl laWAKBR W.P.(St N0. 3637^2011 PBTITIONBR KamalSai Vcrsua RB8PONDBHTS State ofC.Q. & Others WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICI.B 226/SB7 < THB COBSTITUTKW 01? INOIA Aooearance: SIui Anil Singh Rajput, counsel for the pctitioiicr. Shri N.Naha Roy, P.L. for fhe State. ORAL ORMiR (08.07.2011) With the consent ofthe pardes, flie matter is heard iBaaBy. The petitioner was iaitially appointed as Assistaat Teacher on a fixed pay ofRs. 100. After completion ofhte piobation period, he was granted regular pay scale of Rs. 169-300. Leamed counsel for thc pctitioner subaaits that fhe above issuc bss been considered by the M.P. State Admmistoative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 belweea Madhukaat Yadu aad 56 ofhers Vs. State of M.P. and others, whereia it was held fhat the sinularty situated teachers are eatifled to regulm- psiy acaSc with effect finxa fhe date ofmitial appointment. Thc mattcr was takea up to fhc HonTale Supreme Court. Thc appcal was dismissed by tte HonTate Suprcnie Court upholding fhe decision of the Tribuaal to fhe cfibct that the Teachers/Assistant Teacheis are entitled to Tegular pay scale fiiom fhe date of uutial appomtment. It is furfher sutonutted fhat this Court while considering fhe same issue in W.P. ^) No. 4725/2006 between Amar Scd Rwn & Others Vs. Stecte of Chhattiagctih and Others by order dated 01.09.06 aUowed fhe petitioners to make a representatioa witUn a period often days, rateiag aU fhe grievsnces. -^3 Accordingly fhe petitioner 1s grmited Uberty to xuake a representation rateing all his grievaiices ia fhe l^ht of fhe aforesaid judgment aad fhe circular dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P/5), aad ta tura the concemed respondent is directed to decidc the representation, if any, ia accordance with ]aw, on its own merits, within a period of e^ht weeks from. the date of receipt of thc representation subject to veiificatiion offhe facts. In view ofthe foregoing, this petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- PMtinker Diwakar Judge K.,