IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2008 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 7521 of 2008(U) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ CHANDRAMATHI, AGED 52 YEARS, D/O. DRAUPATHI, SREEPADAM, NEDUMAM, KOVALAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SHRI K.KARTHIKEYAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT POLICE COMMISSIONER, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIZHINJAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOVALAM POLICE STATION, KOVALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. JAYALEKSHMI, W/O. BABU, MUKKONAMVILA ROADARIKATHU VEEDU, NEDUMAM, KOVALAM. 5. BIJU, S/O. BABU, RESIDING AT -DO- -DO- 6. MANIKANTAN, S/O. PONNAMMA, VETTUVILA VEEDU, K.S.ROAD, NEDUMOM, KOVALAM P.O. 7. BINU, S/O. SASI, MELEVILA, K.S.ROAD, KOVALAM P.O. 8. SASIDHARAN, S/O. SANKARI, REGHUVARA VILASAM, NEDUMOM, KOVALAM P.O. 9. SIRAJUDIN, S/O. SHAHUL HAMEED, PUTHEN VILAKAM, ROADARIKATHU VEEDU, MUKKONAM VILA, NEDUMOM, KOVALAM. 10. MADHUKUMAR, S/O. VAMADEVAN, SARATHA VILAS, NEDUMAM, KOVALAM P.O. BY ADV. SRI.RAM MOHAN.G. SRI.G.P.SHINOD MANI V. SRI.MANU V. SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC.NO.7521/2008 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE R1 DTD 18.2.2008. /TRUE COPY/ cl K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & P.N. RAVINDRAN, JJ. --------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.7521 OF 2008-U -------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of March, 2008. JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court alleging that respondents 4 to 10 are threatening and harassing her. Her husband was having monetary dealings with the said respondents and others. They claim that substantial amounts are due to them from her husband, who is no more. Aggrieved by the harassment and threat held out by the party respondents, the petitioner has filed Ext.P1 representation before the police and thereafter this writ petition is filed seeking police protection. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that upon receiving the complaint from the petitioner, the party respondents were summoned to the police station and were directed to take recourse to the forums provided under law to recover the money due to them. The counsel appearing for the party respondents submitted that they have no intention to harass the petitioner. They will take recourse to the remedies available under law to recover the amount due to them. Recording the said WPC.NO.7521/2008 . 2 submission, the writ petition is disposed of. K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE P.N. RAVINDRAN, JUDGE. cl