IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1297 of 2006 SHREE NARAYAN SINGH @ SHREE NARAYAN SINGH Versus RAM CHANDRA MANDAL ----------- 2 28,7,2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. This Court would not find any error in the impugned order taking into account that whatever prejudice could have been caused to the petitioner has been sought to be partly ventilated by passing of an order for also framing an additional issue with regard to the valuation of the suit and court fee. The question that such an additional issue may in fact now go to root of the matter and change the jurisdiction, is a hypothetical and speculative expectation of the petitioner specially when the Court has proceeded on the issues which were suggested by both the parties and there is nothing on record to show that at least this issue was earlier also suggested to the Court below prior to the impugned order. Be that as it may, in view of the fact that the plaintiffs have already completed their evidence, this Court would not allow the petitioner to raise question of jurisdiction and therefore, Court below will proceed to examine all the issues as has been framed by it after allowing the defendants to adduce their 2 evidence. With the aforementioned observations/directions, this civil revision application is dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)