HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4111 of 2011 ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction by way of Mandamus to declare the action of the third respondent in interfering with the possession of the petitioner over the land admeasuring Acs.0.09 guntas out of Ac.1.00 forming part of Survey No. 406 situated at Patancheru Village & Mandal, Medak District, as illegal and arbitrary. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is the owner and possessor of the aforesaid land. The grievance of the petitioner is that there is interference by the respondents 4 and 5 over the land in question. Petitioner further alleges that at the instance of respondents 4 and 5, the third respondent is interfering with the right of the petitioner over the said land without any authority of law and jurisdiction. Precisely, petitioner states that the dispute between him and the unofficial respondents herein is civil in nature and the third respondent cannot interfere in such disputes. Basing on the written instructions sent by the Sub- Inspector of Police, Patancheru Police Station, Medak District, dated 25.2.2011, the learned Government Pleader for Home submitted that there is no complaint received from the unofficial respondents against the petitioner nor registered against him on the file of Patancheru Police Station. It is stated that the dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents is civil in nature and the third respondent has nothing to do with it. It is further submitted that the third respondent is not interfering in any manner in the said disputes and in anticipation of criminal complaint by the unofficial respondents, the petitioner filed the present writ petition by making false allegations. Although, petitioner alleged that there is an interference by the third respondent, in view of the statement made by the learned Government Pleader that the third respondent is not interfering in any manner with the possession of the petitioner over the land in question nor any complaint is registered against him, this writ petition is disposed of while recording the said statement of the learned Government Pleader. Further this Court is not inclined to record any finding with regard to the dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents 4 and 5 regarding possession over the land in question. Subject to the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY,J Date: 4th March, 2011 pnb