IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2030 of 2006 Date of Decision. March 1,2007. Harbans Singh ......Petitioner Versus Ram Singh and others .....Respondent PRESENT Mr. Tribhawan Singla,Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suresh Goel, Advocate for respondents 1 to 3 . CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL VINEY MITTAL, J ( Oral ) Defendant no.2 is the petitioner before this Court . He is aggrieved against the orders passed by the Appellate Court whereby on an appeal filed by the plaintiff, an application under Order 39 rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been allowed and the defendant / respondents have been restrained not to alienate the suit property in any manner during the pendency of the suit. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I find that a judicial discretion has been exercised by the Appellate Court in the facts and circumstances of the case, which is not shown to be erroneous in any manner. Consequently, I find no merit in the present petition and the same is hereby dismissed. March 1 , 2007 ( VINEY MITTAL ) mamta JUDGE