•^••'SSSf^sS- ^•••IKSia'^F ^^^•:--"i:^S"''^^. iS'L©i—- tf i.,:p(e^^^J,.t.l."- 'dawd--" .'!' :'::% • :;;.' 'l,.y,_/-._. ^,__ ._:___.____' ' "•fta't' INTHEIHGH^OUKT OFJtJDIC'ATlJRE^^^ wtt^ C'HHATTISGARH WRITPETITIONNO. U^ /2006 ^ 1. Pawaa Kumar Manhar, S/o- Late Sadhu Ram Manhar, Aged about 26 years, R/o- Village - Khapradih, P.0.- Tundra, Tehsil - Kasdol, Distt. Raipur, Chliattisgarh. PETITIONER VERSUS State ofChattisgarh, Through-Secretary, Deptt. OfGeneral Administration, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^^v' 4. 1A 2. Secretary, ?o^^,^i:S>ADeptt. ofPanchayat & Rural Development, •^S^ ^^:>-K-S- Bhawan,Mantralaya, ^V'^^€^S^PW~'CG- f^'^^ff^^-^ State ofMadhya Pradesh, ''' Through-Secretary, G^nera Admirustration Deptt., ^. /o ^c^ecretariat- Bhopal, '^1' M.P. Joiat Commissioner, Deyelopment Commissioner Office, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ChiefExecutive OfBcer, Zila Panchayat (Development) Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Union oflndia, Throgh-Director, Departmemt ftfPersonnel, Trainmg aad Public Grievances, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, NewDelhi. RESPOND1;NTS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE^226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI ETC. 5. ^" t-~.A/ llt5=a~~ i^.tmiflK sasasai^Si^ -^-^s^ XI-HC-22 '3^ -ill'illd'1!, iSTfK-i'is. 'fani^y sii^rq? R-fi* an^i 5b^t ^TSri t^ sii^rwnwHfgn 18-1-2006 Petitioner by Shri Amit Verm^, Advocate. Shri S.P. Kale, Govt. Advocelte, for the State. no.6. Miss Sharmila Singhai, Ci^nfrai Govt. Counsel for respondent Application for urgent hearin^ is ailowed. Heard. This case relates to cont upon the death of an employee ser| Learned counsel for the p|et death ofthe employee occurred 01] and not eartier. It is further submitt^d that in batch of cases bearing W.P. (passionate appointment consequent ring in the State. jetitioner categorically stated that the No.1322/2002 involving the same| thisCourton 20/12/2005. He pra^) thiscase also. Learned counsel for the Stsl states that the State of Chhattisgaj casesofdependants ofthose emfj strictly jn accordance with the pol| submits thatfour months time ft given. In view of the submission^ for the parties, withoutexpressing] in ths opjnion of this Court, ends given to the State of Chhattisg^ consider and decide the case ofl '^N?P^T •Wq?lf •? feiCT ^srfSgiian^i 23-5-2000 i.e. after 1-11-1997 Iquestion ,orders have been passed by (s that similar ordere may bepassed in te does not dispute the above fact and h has taken a decision to consider the loyees who died on or after 1/11/1997 cy prevalent at that time. He however >r issuing necessary orders may be made by learned counsel appearing any opinion on the merits of the case, justice will be sen/ed if a direction js rh and the authorities concerned to the petitioner in accordance with the policy prevalent at the time of de^th of the employee concerned. If the petitioner found eligible, appointrjient orders will be issued as early as possible preferably on or before ?1 directed to render due co-operatii that if any grievance still remain^, the petitioner may avail the remedy ?15' May, 2006. The petitioner is also ibn'to the authorities. It is made clear available under the law including With the aforesaid observal Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counse the order to the respondents for cc|mpliance. |ling of the petition before this Court. 'ions, this petition stands disposed of. who will be obliged to communicate SdJ- Fakhruddin Judge ['tfr^ ^R^sf