IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9862 of 2011 BHARAT BHUSHAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 12.05.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State. Petitioner being husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections498A and 304B of the I.P.C. The marriage was performed on 29.05.2010. It is alleged that on 07.10.2010 the victim was assaulted by the in-laws family on account of non fulfillment of dowry demand. The injury report suggests that the victim was admitted to the hospital on 07.10.2010 with a complain of consuming sulfas pesticide. The victim died on 09.10.2010. The doctor found no external injury. The viscera report was preserved. It is the admitted case of the prosecution that the husband was on training at Bhopal and was not there on the alleged date of the occurrence. It is submitted by Mr. Dashrat Mehta, learned counsel for the State that the husband, on telephone expressed anger which resulted into consumption of poisonous substance by the victim. Considering the fact that death has taken place 2 within few months of the marriage and petitioner is husband, this Court is not inclined to interfere. However, let learned Court below consider the regular bail of the petitioner, keeping in mind that petitioner was not there when the occurrence took place and directly it can not be alleged that the victim consumed pesticide due to the act of the petitioner and the bona fide of the petitioner’s side also gets reflected from the fact that the victim was given adequate medical assistance, if petitioner surrenders within a period of four weeks and pray for regular bail in connection with Khagaul P.S. Case No. 117 of 2010. With the observations made above, the application stands disposed off. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)