IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.13640 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION: August 29, 2006 V.K.Construction Co., Baroda ….Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others …..Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA PRESENT: Shri P.S.Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Viney Mittal,J.(Oral). The petitioner has raised disputed questions of fact, which cannot be determined by this Court, for want of evidence. Moreover, we find that the controversy raised in the present petition essentially challenges an action taken by the respondents under the alleged agreement between the petitioner and the respondents. The petitioner has an effective alternative remedy of approaching the Arbitrator or the Civil Court. Disposed of with the liberty to seek other alternative remedies. (Viney Mittal) Judge August 29,2006 (H.S. Bhalla) KD Judge