IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4067 of 2011 MD. BARIK S/O LATE MD. WAZID Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 20.04.2011 The petitioner was allowed bail by an order dated 03.09.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 29727 of 2010 but on condition that an affidavit would be filed on his behalf that he has fair antecedents. Since there was one other case pending against the petitioner such an affidavit could not be filed and, therefore, he remained in custody. Now the prayer for bail has been renewed explaining the one case pending against the petitioner and the fact that he is in custody since 26.6.2010. Considering that on merits the petitioner was allowed bail and the pendency of one case mentioned above does not interfere with the merits of this case, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No. 283 of 2010, subject to the 2 conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailors shall be the brother/father of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)