IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27882 of 2010 CHANDAN KUMAR GUPTA Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 09.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is husband. He along with other family members is alleged for demand of Colour T.V. and motorcycle and for its non-fulfillment complainant was tortured rather ousted from the house. While submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that she went to her maika and her family members were approached for her Bidai but that was not done. Petitioner was forced to file matrimonial case for restitution of conjugal rights. After notice Complainant’s father assured for her Bidai. Relying thereon earlier Matrimonial Case No. 42 of 2009 was left to be dismissed but there was no Bidai. Again Matrimonial Case No. 35 of 2010 is filed which is now pending. She herself has deserted and to justify her desertion, filed this complaint petition which never can be justified for refusal of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within 2 one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. 57 of 2010, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Bikrmganj, Rohtas subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. Shail ( Mandhata Singh, J.)