(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION [O] No. 1077/2010 IN C.A.NO.905/2010 IN M.C.A.ST.NO.13688/2010 IN F.A.NO. 87/1993. 1.Raje Raghuji Raje Ajitsingh Bhonsale and another. VERSUS 1.Joint Charity Commissioner at Nagpur and others. ________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATED : 31.01.2011. Heard Shri S.S. Deshpande, the learned Counsel for the applicants, Shri A.M. Ghare, the learned Counsel for the appellant and Shri N.W. Sambre, the learned Government Pleader for respondent no.1. By the above Civil Application, the applicants above named i.e. [1] Raje Udaysinghrao s/o Raje Pratapsinghrao Bhonsle and [2] Rajkumar Pratapsinghraje s/o Raje Udaysinghrao Bhonsle claiming to be members of the Junior Bhosle Family, pray that they should be added as parties to the above proceedings or in the alternative they should be allowed to intervene. The above proceedings have arisen out of the orders passed by the (2) learned Charity Commissioner dated 31.07.1971, whereby the temple of 'Lord Shriram' and the property surrounding it was declared as a Public Trust property and is registered as a Public Trust. The issue was thereafter carried higher and has ultimately reached this Court by way of the above First Appeal No. 87/1993. The applicants state that in the event any order is passed against the heirs of the deceased Raje Rajaramsingh Bhonsle, the same would also be binding on the present applicants, as said Raje Rajaramsingh Bhonsle, was representing the Junior Bhonsle family. It is therefore, contended that the applicants are necessary parties or at any rate they are proper parties. Shri A.M. Ghare, the learned Counsel appearing for the original appellant has no objection to the applicants being allowed to intervene in the matter and make submissions. Shri Sambre, the learned Government Pleader states that the applicants were not parties before the Authorities and the Court below and therefore, are now dis-entitled to, being joined as respondents or to intervene in the matter. The learned Government Pleader submits that the application as such would not qualify under the provisions of Order I of Civil Procedure Code. (3) It is required to be noted that there is a Pubic Interest Litigation in respect of the Devasthan, which is being heard by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court. The applicants herein have intervened in the said Pubic Interest Litigation and this Court is informed that they have made their submissions as and when the said Public Interest Litigation is listed. Considering the nature of the First Appeal and the other litigation, which is pending regarding the Temple of Lord Shriram, which is claimed to be the family deity of Bhonsle family, in my view, interest of justice would be served if the applicants are allowed to intervene in the above First Appeal and advance their submissions at the time of final hearing of the above First Appeal. Save and except the aforesaid liberty, no other reliefs are granted to the applicants. Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Rgd