rpa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 59 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 59 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 59 OF 2008 Piyush P.Shah & Ors. .. Applicants V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents. Mrs.Mallika Ingale for the Applicants. Mr.J.P.Yagnik - A.P.P. CORAM : A.P.DESHPANDE, J. CORAM : A.P.DESHPANDE, J. CORAM : A.P.DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 14TH FEBRUARY,2008. DATE : 14TH FEBRUARY,2008. DATE : 14TH FEBRUARY,2008. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- . The present Applicants are original Accused against whom a Complaint has been filed under section 138 read with section 141 of Negotiable Instument Act by the Respondent No.1. An order of issue of process came to be passed by the Magistrate and agrieved by the same, straightway the Criminal Application under section 482 has been filed before this court without taking recourse to the alternative remedy that was available to the present Applicants in the form of revision before the Sessions Court. As there exists an alternative remedy with form of revision, I decline to 2 entertain this application. The application thus stands summarily dismissed. It is made clear that it shall be open to the Applicants to file appropriate revision before the Sessions Judge. At this stage, the learned counsel expressed his apprehension with regard to the bar of limitation for filing of the revision. On an appropriate application being moved before the Sessions Judge, the time spent for prosecuting the proceeding before the review in this court, the same shall be condoned. Application is disposed of. (A.P.DESHPANDE,J.) (A.P.DESHPANDE,J.) (A.P.DESHPANDE,J.)