IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No.448 of 2004 in Letters Patent Appeal St.No.26188 of 2004 Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran ..Petitioners Vs. 1. Mrs.Nirmalaben Shambuprasad Patel and or s. ..Respondents Smt.Neeta Karnik for petitioners. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. Smt.NISHITA MHATRE JJ. 21st February, 2007 21st February, 2007 21st February, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for petitioners. 2. This is a delay condonation application to condone the delay of 121 days. The respondents though served and affidavit to that effect has been filed by the applicants are not present before this Court and, therefore, the averments are deemed to be accepted by the respondents. We also find that the delay has been properly and sufficiently explained. We condone the delay. We direct the office to number the appeal and process it for admission. (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.) (Smt.NISHITA MHATRE J.) (S.B.MHASE J.)