HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4902 OF 2009 DATED 29TH JANUARY, 2010. BETWEEN Kuchimanchi Sri Rama Kishore and anr ……Petitioners and Ms/ Margadarshi Chit Fund Ltd., Rep. By its Branch Manager, Amalapuram, EG Dist and ors … Respondents. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4902 OF 2009 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition by the Judgment Debtors 3 & 4 is ﬁled against the order dated 12.8.2009 passed in E.P.No. 67 of 2008 in O.S.No. 184 of 2004 on the ﬁle of the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District in issuing arrest warrant for realization of the decree amount. The aforesaid EP was ﬁled by the ﬁrst respondent/decree holder against the petitioners/judgment debtors 3 and 4, stating that the third judgment debtor was doing business in construction of apartments in the name and style of M/s. Kuchimanchi Constructions and 4th judgment debtor is doing the business in the name and style of M/s.Mannar Surgicals, and both are having suﬃcient means to discharge the debt due under the decree. However, the same was denied by the judgment debtors by ﬁling counter. The third judgment debtor, who was examined himself as R.W.1 admitted that previously he had done business in the name and style of M/s. Kuchimanchi Constructions, but for the last two years, he is not doing any business due to slag in the business ﬁeld and not making any constructions due to hike in the prices of building materials and competition. In the cross examination, he admitted that he is a builder by profession and he is an income tax assesse and has taken two building contracts at Rajahmundry. The fourth judgment debtor, who was examined as R.W.2 admitted that according to Ex.R.1 his net proﬁt for the year 2008-2009 is Rs.1,72,000/- and gross proﬁt was Rs.2.63,970/- and as per balance sheet the cash on hand was Rs.1,73,389/- and that he is running Munnar Surgicals and the returns were not ﬁled for the same. Considering the above admissions, the lower Court rightly ordered the EP inasmuch as the petitioners/judgment debtors 3 and 4 have suﬃcient means to discharge the decree debt.. This Court by order dated 22.10.2009 stayed the arrest on condition of each of the petitioners depositing 1/4th of the E.P. amount to the credit of O.S.No. 184 of 2004. In spite of the same, they have not deposited 1/4th of the E.P. amount to show their bonafides. Having heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and gone through the impugned order, I do not see any material irregularity or illegality warranting interference with the order under revision. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. ------------------------------------------- JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY DATED 29T H JANUARY, 2010. Msnr.