IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.02.2010 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R. SUDHAKAR W.P.No. 35723 of 2006 1 T.PALANISAMY .. PETITIONER Vs 1 THE DIRECTOR OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 5TH FLOOR, PANAGAL BUILDINGS, SAIDAPET, CHENNAI-15 2 THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PANCHAYAT UNION, SATHYAMANGALAM, 3 THE ADDITIONAL BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PANCHAYAT UNION, SATHYAMANGALAM. .. RESPONDENTS PRAYER Original Application No. 8014 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench to issue a direction to call for the records relating to the proceedings in R.C.No.263/98/A.4 dated 27.2.98 of the Block Development Officer, Panchayat Union, Sathyamangalam, Erode Dist. the 2nd respondent herein and to quash the same and to direct the 2nd respondent to expunge the consequential entries made in the service register of the petitioner to that effect; and consequently to direct the respondent to claim and disburse the salary and allowance for the period 14.11.1997 25.11.1997 and 8.1.98 since he attended duty on O.D. Basis and for 2.12.97 and 3.12.97 in view of the fact that the petitioner applied for C.L. well in advance by sanctioning the same. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was transferred and numbered as Writ petition. For Petitioner : Mr. T. Palanisamy For Respondents : Mr. S. Sivashanmugam Government Advocate https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ ORDER Original Application No. 8014 of 1998 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench to issue a direction to call for the records relating to the proceedings in R.C.No.263/98/A.4 dated 27.2.98 of the Block Development Officer, Panchayat Union, Sathyamangalam, Erode Dist. the 2nd respondent herein and to quash the same and to direct the 2nd respondent to expunge the consequential entries made in the service register of the petitioner to that effect; and consequently to direct the respondent to claim and disburse the salary and allowance for the period 14.11.1997 25.11.1997 and 8.1.98 since he attended duty on O.D. Basis and for 2.12.97 and 3.12.97 in view of the fact that the petitioner applied for C.L. well in advance by sanctioning the same. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was re-transferred and numbered as Writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that he had returned the bundle to the party with consent for change of vakkalath. Such statement had been recorded by the Court earlier on 14.10.2009 and office was directed to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list. On 8.1.2000 there was no representation for the petitioner. On 27.01.2010 also there was no representation for the petitioner. On 12.2.2010, the matter was listed with the name of the petitioner in the cause list. There was no appearance. Hence it was directed to be listed under the caption " For Dismissal". 3. The writ petition is accordingly listed today under the caption " For Dismissal". Today also there is no representation nor the petitioner is present. In view of the above the writ petition dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- Asst.Registrar /True Copy/ Sub.Asst.Registrar sms To 1 THE DIRECTOR OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 5TH FLOOR, PANAGAL BUILDINGS, SAIDAPET, CHENNAI-15 2 THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PANCHAYAT UNION, SATHYAMANGALAM, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3 THE ADDITIONAL BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PANCHAYAT UNION, SATHYAMANGALAM. + 1 cc to Government Pleader,SR.10973 W.P.No. 35723 of 2006 LA(CO) EM/5.3.10 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/