IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43332 of 2008 ANJEET MANDAL @ RANJEET MANDAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 12/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The prayer for bail was rejected as a first occasion considering that he was stated to be a direct assailant. On the second occasion in the renewed prayer case diary was called for when in paragraph-20 the statement of an eye-witness Pramod Kumar Mandal is that the petitioner fired at the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the deposition of the prosecution-witness Pramod Kumar Mandal during trial not supporting the allegations. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri M. M. Chaudhary, A.D.J.- F.T.C.-V, Bhagalpur in Sessions Case No.1523/06 arising out of Industrial P.S. Case No.27/06. Should the prosecution fail for reason of the prosecution-witnesses not supporting the allegations, the court below is directed to take steps accordingly against - 2 - the concerned under Chapter-11 of I.P.C. and initiate proceedings. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )