IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 29TH OCTOBER 2009 / 7TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 27384 of 2009(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- BAIJU,S/O.BHASKARAN,MANATTU HOUSE, OLAVANNA,KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,KOZHIKODE. SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.S.MOHAMMED HASHIM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S. SIRI JAGAN, J ----------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.27384 OF 2009 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of October, 2009. J U D G M E N T By Ext.P5 judgment the State Transport Appellate Tribunal allowed the petitioner's appeal and directed the first respondent to reconsider the petitioner's request for fresh permit in accordance with rules, after the notification was dated 15.9.2008 is approved by the Government. According to the petitioner, that notification was approved by the Government and still the petitioner's application for permit is not being considered in accordance with the direction in Ext.P5 judgment. 2. The learned Government Pleader submits that in view of the large number of applications for permit pending before the RTA, the RTA would require at least two more months' time to consider and pass orders on the application of the petitioner in accordance with Ext.P5 judgment of the Tribunal. 3. Having heard both sides, I dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the first respondent to consider the application for permit filed by the petitioner in accordance with Ext.P5 judgment of the Tribunal, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE. pm