1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7501 OF 2009 Mrs.Piloo wd/o Fali Bomanji & Ors. .. Petitioners. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Vineet Naik with Vaibhav Sugdare i/s M/s.K.Ashar & Co. for the petitioners. Mr.Manoj Mahadik for the respondent-Corporation. Coram : D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Mr.Naik, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if the directions are issued to the City Civil Court to dispose of Notice of Motion No.2757 of 2005 within timeframe. It appears that this notice of motion was heard and closed for orders on 16.10.2008. The learned Judge, who heard the motion, however, did not pronounce the order. In the meanwhile, according to Mr.Naik, suit No.2982 of 2005 and the motion, taken out by the respondent-plaintiff, was transferred to court room No.23. He, therefore, submits that the notice of motion No.2982 of 2005 will have to be heard afresh. I have perused the roznama and also the averments 2 made in the writ petition and I am satisfied this petition can be conveniently disposed, without issuing notice to the respondent, by the following order: The court below shall hear and dispose of the Notice of Motion No.2757 of 2005, if not disposed of already, as expeditiously as possible and preferrably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of this order on merits in accordance with law and after giving an opportunity of being heard to all the parties to the proceedings. With these observations the writ petition is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)