1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4451/1999 Chandramohan Chandranarayan Maheshwari and another ..versus.. Sarojbai Subhaschandra Agrawal and another AND WRIT PETITION NO. 4452/1999 Chandramohan Chandranarayan Maheshwari and another ..versus.. Shardadevi Vishwanath Agrawal and another AND WRIT PETITION NO. 4453/1999 Chandramohan Chandranarayan Maheshwari and another ..versus.. Manjulalta Subhaschandra Agrawal and another =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-== Shri J.J.Chandurkar, Counsel for petitioners C ORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 20th JULY, 2010. Heard. 2) The matter relates to fixing of fair rent, seeking challenge to the concurrent findings against the petitioner. By efflux of time, the matter has virtually lost its importance. 2 3) The order under challenge, did not call for any interference as the learned Judge has considered whether the non-applicant was defaulter in payment of rents. 4) The matter was heard extensively by the Division Bench as to before whom it will be argued and the Division Bench directed to place the matter before the learned Single Judge for appropriate order and disposal. Hence it is placed before this Court. 5) The controversy between the parties, as could be seen from the orders of Additional Collected dated 31st August, 1999, does not warrant for any interference. Consequently, Writ Petition Nos. 4451/99, 4452/99 and 4453/99 are disposed of.. 6) It is clarified, the landlord's remedy for fixation of fair rent in spite of dismissal of writ petition is not taken away, if the change in the circumstances is emerged in his favour. (K.U.Chandiwal) JUDGE. Rvjalit