IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. R.F.A. No. 224 of 2004. Decided on: 13th September, 2010. Smt. Kanta Bhardwaj alias Kavita Bhardwaj and others. …Appellants/Defendants. -Versus- Shri Devinder Nath Bhardwaj and others. …Respondents/Defendants. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the appellants. : Mr. Dushyant Dadhwal, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. K.D. Sood, Advocate with Mr. Rajnish K. Lall, Advocate. For respondents No. 3 to 5. : Mr. Kamlender Bhardwaj, Advocate vice Mr. Virender Singh Rathore, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): In sequel to order dated 17.08.2010 read in conjunction with order dated 31.08.2010, the parties have moved an application under Order 23 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure alongwith the compromise. The same is permitted to be taken on record. The compromise shall form integral part of this judgment. The undertaking given in the compromise is accepted by the parties. The parties are directed to punctually obey the terms and conditions annexed with the compromise (Annexure X- 1). 2. Consequently, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the appeal stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. However, the parties are directed to punctually abide by the terms and conditions enumerated in the compromise deed. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge. 13th September, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No.