IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21457 of 2009 1. MANJAY CHAUDHARY 2. LAKHURI CHAUDHARY @ LUKARI CHAUDHARY @ LUKURIA CHAUDHARY 3. BHAGIRATH CHAUDHARY @ BHAGIRATHI CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 07.07.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner. No one appears on behalf of the State. The petitioners, who are related inter se, have approached this Court seeking bail in a case instituted under diverse sections including section 436 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on bare reading of the complaint (later on lodged as an FIR) lodged by the complainant, the case is based on circumstantial evidence. No witness including the complainant/informant has seen the petitioners putting the hut of the complainant/informant on fire. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that parties are agnates and are on inimical term as the present prosecution party is facing charges of murder of one of the sons of petitioner no.3. Referring to the impugned order, it is contended that the learned Sessions Judge has also noted the circumstantial evidence against the petitioners. The petitioners appear to be in custody since 24.9.2008. - 2 - In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners abovenamed be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 3rd Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with S.T.No.549/2008 arising out of Ara Muffasil P.S.Case No. 221/2006. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )