1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2222 OF 2009 Mukesh Kanmal Jain .. Applicant. Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondents. Mr.Sachin R.Pawar for the applicant. Mr.J.P.Yagnik A.P.P. for the State. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 7TH JULY, 2009 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Mr.Yagnik, learned A.P.P. submits that the trial has already commenced and it should get over within next 3-4 months provided the accused persons do not seek adjournment on frivolous grounds. In view of the statement made by learned A.P.P., learned counsel for the applicant prays for withdrawal of this application with liberty to the applicant to file fresh application for bail if the trial does not get over within four months. The application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. The trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of the trial expeditiously. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)