IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.658 of 2009 Date of decision : May 28, 2010 Amrit Lal …Petitioner. Versus Lala Ram and another …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. G.R. Palsara, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. S.C. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Surjit Singh, J (Oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. One more opportunity is directed to be given to the petitioner, by the Sub Divisional Officer (Civil), for production of Tatima, referred to in zimini order dated 8th September, 2009, of Sub Divisional Officer (Civil), Chachiot at Gohar. Petitioner shall be given one month time for producing and proving that Tatima and within next two months main petition shall be disposed of, of course after recording the evidence of both the parties. 3. Petition stands disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. Copy of the order be given dasti to both the parties, so that they may show it to the Sub Divisional Officer (Civil), Chachiot. May 28, 2010(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?