IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 26TH JULY 2011 / 4TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 15924 of 2011(M) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- NOBLE THOMAS, S/O.THOMAS, AGED 29 YEARS, KALLUPRAYIL HOUSE, KUTHIRAKKALLU KARA, THANKAMANI VILLAGE, UDUMPANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.T.V.GEORGE SRI.JIMMY GEORGE (THADATHIL) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL LINES, PAINAVU, IDUKKI, PIN - 685 603. 2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DEVIKULAM, PIN - 685 613. 3. TAHSILDAR, UDUMPANCHOLA, NEDUMKANDAM P.O., PIN - 685553. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THANKAMONI VILLAGE OFFICE, THANKAMONI, IDUKKI, PIN - 685515. 5. THOMAS JOSEPH, PARAMUNDAYIL HOUSE, KUTHIRAKKALLU KARA, VIMALGIRI P.O., THANKAMONI, IDUKKI, PIN - 685515. 6. SANKARAN BINU, S/O.SANKARAN, NELLIKUNNEL HOUSE, MADATHUMKADAVU BHAGAM, KUTHIRAKKALLU KARA, VIMALAGIRI P.O., THANKAMONI, IDUKKI, PIN - 685515. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 15924 of 2011(M) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD 10/8/2010 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 : COPY OF STOP MEMO DTD 4/9/2010 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P3 : COPY OF STOP MEMO DTD 1/10/2010 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P4 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD 15/11/2010 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P5 : COPY OF LETTER DTD 22/2/2011 ISSUED BY THE ADDL. TAHSILDAR. EXT.P6 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD 10/5/2011 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS - NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 15924 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 26th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner is that the party respondents have committed encroachment in violation of the provisions of the Kerala Land Conservancy Act. It is stated that complaining of the above, he made Ext.P6 representation to respondents 1 and 2 and that there has not been any action taken thereof. 2. In this writ petition, although notice has been issued and has been served on the aforesaid party respondents, they have not chosen to enter appearance or contradict the contentions of the petitioner. In view of the above and taking note of the pendency of the representation mentioned above, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 2nd respondent to take action on Ext.P6 in accordance with law and with notice to the parties concerned. This the 2nd respondent shall do, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp