IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.2834 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 30.04.2010 Balwant Kumar Jain and others … Petitioners Versus Union of India and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA Present: Mr.Suman Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Vinod K.Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition on merits and prays that keeping in view the fact that Union of India was proceeded against ex parte in the year 2006. The application for setting aside the ex parte order, was nothing but misuse of the process of court, therefore, the trial Court be directed to expedite the hearing of the application moved under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure for setting aside the ex parte decree. In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner, this revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, learned trial Court is directed, to dispose of the application moved by the Union of India under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure expeditiously, but not later than four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. [Vinod K. Sharma] Judge 30.04.2010 sd