IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated : Nainital the 15th April, 2008 Criminal Bail Application No.190 of 2008 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Gurdeep Singh S/o Inder Singh R/o Raghuliya, P.S. Khatima District U. S. Nagar … Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand … Opposite Party Arising out of case crime No.95 of 2008 Under Sections 332, 333, 353 IPC, Section 135 of the Electricity Act and Section 2/3 Public Property (Protection) Act P.S. Khatima District U. S. Nagar Hon’ble J.C. S. Rawat, J. Heard Mr. B. S. Parihar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. G. S. Sandhu, learned G.A. for the State. Perused the record. According to the prosecution case, Prabhat Kumar (J.E.), Bhagirath and Chandra Yadav (line men) while discharging their official duty found that the accused applicant and co-accused have taken the illegal electric connection of light by using direct line. Thereafter, they cut down the said illegal electric connection. When they were collecting the wire, all the accused persons started assaulting them. It is in the statement that Bhagirath and Prabhat Kumar were caused injuries by Gurdeep (present applicant) and Chidar Singh. The injuries sustained by both of them are simple in nature. Co-accused Chidar Singh has already been released on bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicant is entitled to get the bail on the ground of parity. Let the applicant-accused be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. (J.C.S.Rawat, J.) Dated 15.04.2008 LSR