1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.10.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRL.O.P.(MD)No.14042 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 V.Subbiah : Petitioner Vs. 1.State rep. by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station(South), Dindigul District, (Crime No.152 of 2010). 2.Jothi Michael : Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records relating to the charge sheet in C.C.No.161 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kodaikanal and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Arun Murugan For R-1 : Mr.P.Kannithevan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R Seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.161 of 2010 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kodaikanal, the petitioner has come up with this petition. 2. Though several grounds are raised in this petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the proceedings deserved to be quashed on the ground that there is inordinate delay in preferring the complaint. In my considered opinion, that is not at all a ground to quash the proceedings. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would further submit that this is a false case foisted against the petitioner and therefore, the proceedings may be quashed. In my considered opinion, it is a matter for appreciation by the trial Court only after analysing the evidence let in by the prosecution and therefore that is not a ground to quash the proceedings. 4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) would submit that already two witnesses have been examined before the trial Court. 5. In such view of the matter, it is too late for this Court to go into the other grounds raised in this petition and therefore, I do not find any reason to interfere with the proceedings in C.C.No.161 of 2010 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kodaikanal. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is a physically challenged person and therefore a direction may be issued to the trial Court to dispose of the case. 7. Having regard to the said fact, a direction is issued to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kodaikanal to expedite the trial in C.C.No.161 of 2010 and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.side) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(C.S) To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Kodaikanal. 2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station(South), Dindigul District, 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. pm ORDER MADE IN CRL.O.P.(MD).No.14042 of 2011 and MP(MD)No.1 of 2011 29.10.2011 TR :11.11.2011: 2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/