IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No. 166 of 2008. Date of Decision: 20.6.2008. ________________________________________________________________ Rukmani Devi ….. Petitioner Versus Radha Devi … Respondent. ________________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner : Mr. G.R.Palsra, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) ________________________________________________________________ Deepak Gupta, J (Oral): This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is directed against the order of the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div), Court No.II, Mandi, HP, whereby he has allowed the application filed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act read with Section 151 CPC, by the respondent ( hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) praying that the thumb impression and signatures appended on the documents Ex.PW2/A and Ex.PW3/B, allegedly executed by the petitioners (hereinafter referred to as the defendants) be got compared from an expert with the - 2 - impression and signatures of the defendants on the written statement, Vakalatnama and the deposition made in Court. It may be true that this application was filed at the stage of arguments. The learned trial Court has allowed the same in exercise of jurisdiction vested in it by law. There is no error of jurisdiction in the impugned order calling for interference in exercise of the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court. The petition is, therefore, dismissed, in limine. June 20, 2008 ( Deepak Gupta ), J. s.