@ af’irming the orda dated 10.12.2L‘0g passed by the iu§ic§a£ Magistrata First c§a3s, Bhamgaara in umegistered casa (Laxman mhimar v. Lekhmm Patkar and two Gthar's). E have heaa’d Ieamed counsel far the parties, pe¥u$ed the omer impisgned N! and ether documents fiied on beheif of tah.e pe..it§oner. + 3. Learned couneei fer the petétéoner subméis eh met the eetithner hes med compiaim agamst respandents NM t0 3 for the effence punishabie una’er Sections 406, 420, 465, 457 am} 505/34 0f the LP‘Q and has examined himseif and wiinesees. Reeoft was aiso caued frem ihe peiice. After ceneidering the statement and repart, the triet Ccurt has diemissea‘ the cemptaint under Sectien 203 of the CLEO. $eme was chettengea’ hetore the revistenat Ceurt and the revisiehet Ceurt hee etse dtemtssed the revtsten. Learned ceunsel further submtts that statement tecordee? under Sectton 230 at the Cr.P.C. of the cempteihaht ctee 5y reveet that respehdehte Net to 3 had usea‘ biank withdi'awat term and had withdrawn the mehey of Rs.85t3{}i— which ttseh' te cttehce punishabte unde.’ Secttens 405? 42G, 465, 4E7 and 565134 of the LPC. 4. On the ether hand, teamed ceunset for respenttehts Nat t0 3 oppases the petition and submits that the Caurts beiew have rightty dismissed the compiaiht. in the tight at statement ct the petitionet recorded une‘er Secticn 2% ot U! the Cr. .C., without arty further cemment both the enters i.e. erder of Judiciai Magistrate First C ass, Bhetapra and order of Additionai $eeeiens Judge, Bhatapara are hereby quashed. Case is remitted t0 the Court at Judiciei Magistrate First Ciass, Bhatapra tar turther inquiry into cemptaint dismiesed under Sectien 203 at the CLPJC“ The petitioner is directed ta remain present before the trial Court on 3.3.2ti’t’t. “Z,— Sdl ‘ 1.P. Sharma ‘udQe