In The High^©ourt6f Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur S'fflflifi BSHGI C.H.5^^/2003 AopKcant •efendant RgSpondant^ »laintiff Vs. Gulam Rasul S/o Mohammed Age 52 years, Resident ofBidpara Ralgarh Tah. & Mstfc Raigarh (C.G.) NoBar lal Patel S/o Shri Karuna Sagar Patel Age 42years. Resdent ofvillage Ralgada Tah. & Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) XI-HC-22 3ii^r^?r l^n^sii^r shli«b^(T 3^'3nincBr,.STftwre, Riciiyy 311^1151 ch 111CTI Sl*lItB """""••••••"•••^ 2Qfl3 f^s ^ft.^§..^^^gi „ .- -^^ .; - ty.y^..^yv^; n ^ '' '. • None forthe applicant. The matter is laken up a; out thrice but none appeared f' case was cailed out, nobody apj ^ pass over case. Yesterday, it was calied >r the appljcant and even today, when th( sared on behaif of the appilcant. The instant revision is &y llnd Addt.District Judge, bywhich the objectlon of the tocument on the around that t! property stamped and as such t| \ The instant revision is proviso to SecSlon 115 of 'She down by the Apex Court repor| Li'-i-a^?"^li?%^°iK/ Ah& rs^i^iri 'i Uiii'yiy, iUS I CVi<3I^ <»ii<ifa<fl-i>ii*idTfffel<fl <Ri'wi< ^srf^Tsn^r (ected against the impugned order passed Raifaarh (C.G.) in Civil Suit No.lO-A'2002 and ^pplicant regarding the admissibility of the thtough She document ts a bond which is not |e same Is Inadmissible, was .relected.. ot maintainable in yiew of the amended ;-ode of Civi! Procedure and the !aw !aid ?"srl 1CC 65; GW in the matter S6w ShaW Cwm. us'na feefotv. /itoour Vs. ^varal and Otiwrs as welt as in the cbse of Sun/a Devi W Vs. fem Chandw in itition is dismissed as n&t maintainab!e. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge