IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.25673 of 2009 JASJIT SINGH PURI (J. S. Puri), son of Late Mehar Singh Puri, Resident of D-5, Puspanjali Enclave, Pitampura, P.S. Mangolepuri, New Delhi-34 ….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Sri Rai Vimal Krishna, son of Late Rai Uday Krishna, resident of Anand Bagh, P.S. Khajekalah, Patna City, Patna …Opposite Parties With Cr. Misc. No. 38797 of 2009 JASJIT SINGH PURI (J. S. Puri), son of Late Mehar Singh Puri, Resident of D-5, Puspanjali Enclave, Pitampura, P.S. Mangolepuri, New Delhi-34 ….Petitioner Versus 1 THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Sri Rai Vimal Krishna, son of Late Rai Uday Krishna, resident of Anand Bagh, P.S. Khajekalah, Patna City, Patna …Opposite Parties With Cr. Misc. No. 38799 of 2009 JASJIT SINGH PURI (J. S. Puri), son of Late Mehar Singh Puri, Resident of D-5, Puspanjali Enclave, Pitampura, P.S. Mangolepuri, New Delhi-34 ….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Sri Rai Vimal Krishna, son of Late Rai Uday Krishna, resident of Anand Bagh, P.S. Khajekalah, Patna City, Patna …Opposite Parties With Cr. Misc. No. 38800 of 2009 JASJIT SINGH PURI (J. S. Puri), son of Late Mehar Singh Puri, Resident of D-5, Puspanjali Enclave, Pitampura, P.S. Mangolepuri, New Delhi-34 ….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Sri Rai Vimal Krishna, son of Late Rai Uday Krishna, resident of Anand Bagh, P.S. Khajekalah, Patna City, Patna …Opposite Parties With Cr. Misc. No. 38801 of 2009 JASJIT SINGH PURI (J. S. Puri), son of Late Mehar Singh Puri, Resident of D-5, Puspanjali Enclave, Pitampura, P.S. Mangolepuri, New Delhi-34 ….Petitioner - 2 - Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Sri Rai Vimal Krishna, son of Late Rai Uday Krishna, resident of Anand Bagh, P.S. Khajekalah, Patna City, Patna …Opposite Parties With Cr. Misc. No. 38802 of 2009 JASJIT SINGH PURI (J. S. Puri), son of Late Mehar Singh Puri, Resident of D-5, Puspanjali Enclave, Pitampura, P.S. Mangolepuri, New Delhi-34 ….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Sri Rai Vimal Krishna, son of Late Rai Uday Krishna, resident of Anand Bagh, P.S. Khajekalah, Patna City, Patna …Opposite Parties With Cr. Misc. No. 38803 of 2009 JASJIT SINGH PURI (J. S. Puri), son of Late Mehar Singh Puri, Resident of D-5, Puspanjali Enclave, Pitampura, P.S. Mangolepuri, New Delhi-34 ….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Sri Rai Vimal Krishna, son of Late Rai Uday Krishna, resident of Anand Bagh, P.S. Khajekalah, Patna City, Patna …Opposite Parties With Cr. Misc. No. 39313 of 2009 JASJIT SINGH PURI (J. S. Puri), son of Late Mehar Singh Puri, Resident of D-5, Puspanjali Enclave, Pitampura, P.S. Mangolepuri, New Delhi-34 ….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Sri Rai Vimal Krishna, son of Late Rai Uday Krishna, resident of Anand Bagh, P.S. Khajekalah, Patna City, Patna …Opposite Parties With Cr. Misc. No. 39314 of 2009 JASJIT SINGH PURI (J. S. Puri), son of Late Mehar Singh Puri, Resident of D-5, Puspanjali Enclave, Pitampura, P.S. Mangolepuri, New Delhi-34 ….Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & - 3 - 2. Sri Rai Vimal Krishna, son of Late Rai Uday Krishna, resident of Anand Bagh, P.S. Khajekalah, Patna City, Patna …Opposite Parties ----------- 2/ 15.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the opposite party no.2 in all the Cr. Misc. applications. Through the aforesaid applications, the petitioners seek quashing of order of cognizance in Complaint Case No. 925-C of 2001, 190-C of 2002, 766-C of 2000, 855-C of 2000, 827-C of 2000, 768-C of 2000, 225-C of 2001, 832-C of 2001, 85-C of 2003, pending before Sri Ramayan Ram, Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Patna,/ Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, Judicial Magistrate, Patna,/ Sri D. M. Tripathi, Judicial Magistrate, Patna,/ Sri S. K. Singh, Judicial Magistrate, Patna,/ Sri D. M. Tripathi, Judicial Magistrate, Patna,/ Sri D. M. Tripathi, Judicial Magistrate, Patna,/ Sri R. K. Tripathi, Judicial Magistrate, 1st , Patna/ Sri D. M. Tripathi, Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Patna, and Sri R. K. Tripathy, Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Patna, respectively on the ground that this court in connected matters heard in Cr. Misc. No. 44101 of 2007 and other analogous cases has quashed the proceeding of nine cases vide order dated 25.11.2009 and observed that other cases would also be quashed in view of the final financial settlement between the parties. It has been submitted jointly that the matter has now been settled between them and Rs.1,25,000/- has been paid to the complainant in consideration of the final settlement. Considering the submission as well as the order made in the order dated 25.11.2009 vide Cr. Misc. No.44101 of 2007 and its analogous cases, order of cognizance in the aforementioned cases are - 4 - hereby quashed. The applications stand allowed. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)