P.R.No..........2.^,f:l^-. Presented by Shfi..,?^^..^-—•••••" dated.............l..?t.A-/f-'—"•••""•"••••"• In the Hon'ble Hish Court ofChhattis?arh, Bilaspur. SiNGLE BENCI '?('-,'? W.P.No..^ ........ 2006 Petitioner Resuondents Yashwant Kumar Dewangan, Age 52 years, S/o Late Shri Mahavir Dewangan, Assistant Grade III P.W.D., Patan Sub Division, Patan, Distt. Durg. Versus 1. The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, •' Through - The Secretary Govt. C.G. Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. The Superintendmg Engineer, r P.W.D. Durg Circle, Durg (C.G.) Writ Petition Under Articles 226/227 of The Constitution Of India for the issuance of WRIT in the nature of MANDAMUS certiorari. Prohibition and for other suitable writ or writs. order or orders, direction or directions. »-. 731 ^WM^, VliS\WW, ^WWy. '^ 200 ^ STT^T^iach (yi(^ci<,iT) °tii<itci<n-i wticff ir te^t <fa<-<;i< ^i3l1^)T 311^1 sn^TqirfSFriq; (T8IT 311^1 shHi'h ?TdTW;(rf?(T3TI^T 20-7-a006 for ftie petitioner. nunent Advocate for fhe State/ t, the petitioner has chalfenged his (Anaexure P-1) passcd by ^etitioner has been ta-ansferred fi?oiu Mr. R.S. Shrivastava, Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, Gtniji respondents, on advance copy. Heard both fhe counseL Bv thc iastant wrif transfer order dated 7-7-: respondent No.2, whereby fhe Durg to Bemetara. The casc of the petitionei) Assistant Grade-III in PubUc He was appointed ia fhe year| petitfoner is that juniors to the years in Durg Division have nol] has been transferred which working in Dui^ Dndsion sinc4 Division. Thc petitioner is has to^take precaution in food awav from inental tension. In the circuinstaaces, subinits that the petittoner Bepresentatton to respondent same, to which teamed respondents has no objectton. Having heard leanied to fhe facts aad circuinstancesl Works sufF^rin is fhat fhe petltmner is working as Departanent at Duig Diviskm. 1975. The main grievance of the Ipctitioner who are working since 25 1 bcen teansferred and fhe petitioner ^ bad. Ofher eniployees who ase 1980 have been retained in Durg ^ring fi-oin Blood Sugar, as such, he ]and he is required to keep hiiaself l|sanied counsel for fhe petittoncr ni^y be aUowed to makc a dctaited N<».1 and he be directed to dccide the co]unsel appearing for the Statc/ co^tasel for the parties, having regard |of the case aad wifhout expressing P.T.O. "^S'! XI-HC-78 7s[^Wv^, u-^u'w, Ri<nitiy 60. HFRpn gi»TT9> 'V^ 200i< sn^yaco (yil^q^ir) STI^TqiTR-ficb (raran^Tshtiich ??(TIWllfsa'3I1^T ^l ?ipriwfl;T WRff ^'feccft'TRfRTC ^; 3lf^q'STT^T Soma MB' any opiaion on tfae mcrits of i^e casc, the prayer made by tearaied counsel for the pctitioner is jv{st, &ir and reasoiiablc. Therefore, thc petitioner is aUowed to m^ke a detailcd represeutation atong with a copy ofthis petition to r^spondent No. 1 witfam 10 days 6om today aad ia tum, respondekit No.l is directed to decidc tfae iiepreseatatioa of the petitioitc^ within a period of30 dars fix»mthe date of its receipt, after consi|deriag all the poiats raised by the petitioner, ia accordaace with l^w. With the direction afores^id, the petition staads disposed of. Consequentty, M.(W.)P.N|o.2772/2006 also stands disposed Partics are entitled for ce^dfied copy offhis oider. Sd/- 1 L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.