'f' k '"'T' .^' A^ ^v 03 .Mi \^'y \^^r [•^' ,..-""^.^'^ »...-^-5^ ;^ ^'y^' ^"..^^ Dr. N,P. S/o. B.L- 68 years, Retd. -Director, •• .R/o. C.M.D. (C,GJ - 1. of its of D.K..S. Raipur (C.tl) 2, of Pradesb., •'•ita of 3« . & & ' (M.P.? 4. & (C.G.) I» (•^ y ---—..^n^ XI-HC-22 w^r^r f^F3TI^T $b^|cb^T^T ^ ^Mdl $bHT^ 3^ ^ii<iici<4, yiTft'Hli<o, fs)dl^^< 311^1 .UAp.^0.,..^. ^^i..[b.^^ f^R^ 41 3TI^T?^T^R:^cT 2-5-2005 Mr. Bhaskar Pyasi, Mr. Sudhir Agrawal, P< Heard both the counse The case of the petil Lecturer in the year 1961 Biiaspur. Later on, the peti' 1974-75. The said Coliege Madhya Pradesh with effec} the same, entire staff ofl ©overnment service. Ini Professor in Engtish in the Madhya Pradesh. Subseq^ Degree College and ultim^ Additiona! Director, Higher the retirement, vide represented to the compe| rendered by hiin in the Co Madhya Pradesh/cxnd uitirn| order dated 3-4-2003 (An^ making representations, ^i couhsei CM^F<n4i-i ^iH^T^:tel^i'<r3i<-<ii< ^3Tf^'R'3TI^T for the petitioner. jinel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ti. ioner is that initiaiiy, he was appointed as n a ^overnment Aided Private College at poner was promoted as Principal in the year |^as taken over by the erstwhile State of from i-10-1982, and as a consequence of the Coliege was aiso absorbed in the f'iaily, the petitioner was absorbed as ^epartment of Higher Education, State of jently, he was promoted as Principal of tely, the petitioner retired as Regiona! Education, Raipur/ Bastar Division. Prior to dated 28-4-1993, the petitioner tent authorit/ for recounting his service !ege prior to taking oyer by the State of xtely that was aliowed to be counted vide icxure P-4). Since then the petitioner is jt, the respondent authorities are not orjder XI-HC-22 3TT^T^T f^TN)3T^?T t^^f?(T $»')^I<=b^T w ^f ^' (^A^ ^l^^l »)^(cb 3^-^ii^Krt^, ^T{1<M4l<o, ic|dl<H^< 311^1 M5|ch ^ 200 Ri<?<^ 31^T5^<n"^K^1N —^ passina any prder/ after coi him when 1+ie Colle9e was they are not compiying with As such, learned coi respondent Guthorities bel nting his services which were rendered by |"un by Private Organization, and thereby, |the order dated 3-4-2003 (Annexure P-4). tnsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and pass appro^r consideration the order d|ited 3-4-2003 (Annexure P-4), and aiso considering the fact that amount of management shc iearned Panel Lawyer has no Having heard learne< Ismited request made by decide pension case of the With the direction af Consequently, I,A.No| cni^?<n41Ti ^i^^T^teT^'<Ri<-<i< ^3Tf^T3TT^T directed to consider the case of the riate regarding pension after taking into the petitioner has Glready deposited the tre to the tune of Rs.l2,733A, for which |objection. counsel for the parties, having re9ard to the facts and circumstance^ of the case and aiso having regard to the iearned counsel for the petitioner, which appears to be fair and r^asonable, respondent No.4 is directed to petitioner within a period of three months from today, after consideri|ig a!l the points raised by the petitioner, in accordance with law. oresaid the petltion stands disposed of. 3290/2005 also stands disposed of. Parties are entitied ^or certified copy of this order^ Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge