IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17034 of 2010 SACHIDANAND SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 17.05.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. The grievance of the petitioner, stated to be a PDS dealer, is with regard to non-supply of food grains despite deposit of Cost. Counsel for the State rightly submits that there is no statement in the writ petition that no show cause has been issued and the PDS licence has not been cancelled or suspended. Subject to the objections raised on behalf of the State, if the petitioner has a valid subsisting licence, has deposited the cost of the food grains and has represented against non-supply of the food grains, let his representation be disposed in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of one month from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)