This petiton has been filed by the petieorns heein who are 3 in number namely P.Srinvi.. with a rpayer to quash the proceedings inCC No. 423 of 2007 on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate.. so far as they are concerned. Respodnetn No.2.. Sha.. Rao presented a report before the Station Hoseu Officer, alleging inter alia that HCL ..Co-operative House building Asociety purchased a land under registered sale deeds of Ac.40 acres of land was divided into 500 plots and the society allotted the plots to the members. The society got the lay out approved by Visakhaptnam Urban Developmetn Authority vide LP No. 24/94 and 4/2002. Whiel so, P.Venkata Ramana.. alogn with others … when the members questioned them, they alognw ith their men attached the allotees. It is further averred int eh report that they alsoabused the allottees in an unparliamentary language and thretned them with dire consequences. Basing on the eport, a case inc r.nO. 320 of 2004 for the offence U/sec. .. came to be registered against P.Ramana….. after due investigaton, a charge sheet came to be presented against 13 accused pesons. IX Meterol . took the charge sheet on file as Cc No. 423 of 2007. Hence thisp etiton by A-7,A8 abnd A10 with the prayer stated supra. Despite notice beign serviced ont eh respodnet No.2, he did not chose to enter appeance either in person or through counsel. Heared learned counsel appearing for the petietonr and the learned A.P.P. appearing for the repsonddtn No.1 state. Leanred cousnela peparing for the petieorn submitted that except omnibus statement int eh charge sheet against the petieonrs no specific overtacts have been attributed against them and he would also contend that the names of the petitioners do nto figure int heFIR presnte dbyt he defacto complainant. He would also contend that A-3 P.Venkat Rao who is simialry situated as that of the petiteorns approached this court by filign Crl.P.No. 5804 of 2007 and the said petiton came to be allwoe don 3-12-2007 quashing the proceedings so far as he is concerned and therefore, the petitoenrs also deseved for the same relief. Learned A.P.P. opposed the application. As seen from the material broguth on record, the names of the petitoenrs do not find place in the Fir. During the ivnestigaiton also as reflected in the charge sheet no witness has attributed the overtacts attributable to the petieorns herein. One of the accused namely P.Venkat Rao who has fiture das A-3 in Cc .. approached this court for quashing theproceeidngs so far as he is concered ane the same criminal petition is allwoedon 3-12-… para No.5 of the order passed in Crl.P.No. 5804 of .. and it is thus. Petitones also stand on the same footing that of A3 they also deserved for the same relid. Accordingly,t eh criminal eptitoin is allowed. __________ 22-07-2010 Mjl/*