IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7811 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 7811 OF 2006 WRIT PETITION NO. 7811 OF 2006 Eknath Maruti Patil ] .. Petitioner Versus 1. Laxmibai Chandrappa Chile & Anr. ] .. Respondents Mr. S.S. Redekar for the petitioner. CORAM: S.B. MHASE, J. DATED: 22ND JUNE, 2007 P.C. : . Heard. 2. The petitioner is admittedly the owner of the vehicle. It is his case that he has sold his vehicle. However, the Claims Tribunal has found that the original documents have not been produced on record. The Appeal preferred is not on record. There is nothing to show that possession was delivered and, therefore, directed the payment of compensation by the petitioner. This Court does not find any error in the judgment. Petition is, therefore, rejected. Sd/- : 2 : [S.B. MHASE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.]