IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THIS THE 31st DAY OF DECEMBER, 2009 W.P.No.29323 of 2009 BETWEEN: Smt K.Vasundhara ... PETITIONER(S) and Rajendranagar Municipality rep by its Commissioner, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R. District and others …RESPONDENT(S) THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.29323 of 2009 ORDER: Petitioner claims to have submitted a representation to the 1st respondent alleging that the 3rd respondent deviated from the sanctioned plan while making construction in premises bearing plot no.3, Manikonda, Rajendranagar Municipality, Ranga Reddy District. His grievance is that no steps have been taken thereon. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2. This Court cannot express any opinion as to whether the 3rd respondent has deviated from the sanctioned plan. It is for the respondents 1 and 2 to verify and to arrive at a conclusion. The representation made by the petitioner cannot be kept pending indefinitely. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent nos.1 and 2 to pass orders on the representation submitted by the petitioner against the 3rd respondent, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J 31st December 2009 CVRK