IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 18TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 27TH KARTHIKA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 978 of 2010(S) ------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.35521/2008 Dated 27/01/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WPC 35521/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------- V.K.BHARATHI, W/O.ANANTHAN NAIR, AGED 62 YEARS, SHAMAJ BHAVAN, PADINHARATHARA P.O. VYTHIRI TALUK, WAYANADU - 673 575. BY ADV. SRI.P.P.JACOB RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- P.MAMMOOTTY, S/O.MAYAN, AGED 51 YEARS, ONEEMAL HOUSE, P.O.VARAMBATTA, PADINHARATHA, WAYANADU, SECRETARY, PADINHARATHARA, SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F.1664, P.O.PADINHARATHARA, WAYANADU - 673 575. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- Cont.Case No.978 of 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 18th November, 2010 J U D G M E N T It is complaining of non-compliance of the directions in Annexure -IV judgment, this contempt petition has been filed. 2. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent, he only seeks liberty to appropriate the amount due to it under Annexure -R1 (a) award from out of the dues of the petitioner and to that course, petitioner has also no objection. 3. Therefore, the contempt petition is closed with liberty to the respondent to disburse the amount due to the petitioner after appropriating the amount due under Annexure R1 (a) award. This, as agreed by the respondent, shall be done within one month from today. It is made clear that such appropriation, will be without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to challenge the same. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma /True copy/ P.A to Judge