1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPW) NO. 54 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 720 OF 2010 (Sohel Shaikh Abdul Karim vs. Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri Vinay Dahat, Advocate for the applicant/ petitioner. Shri D.B. Yengal, APP for the respondents. ….. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. MAY 04, 2011. Heard Shri Dahat, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Yengal, learned APP for the respondents. The applicant was granted parole by order dated 19.06.2010 for 30 days. Pursuant to the said order he was released on 01.07.2010. The applicant surrendered late by 90 days. Prayer of the applicant is that his parole period be extended for the said period of 90 days. The applicant had preferred Criminal Writ Petition 720 of 2010, wherein he had sought the very same prayer. This Court after considering the matter in depth, rejected the prayer of the petitioner by order dated 18.01.2011. We see no reason to take a different view. Application is rejected. 2 The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there were grave and serious reasons as to why the petitioner could not report back to the prison in time. Hence, on this count, he has prayed that the period be extended or no punishment be imposed for the period of overstay. As far as the first prayer is concerned, the same has been considered by this Court in order dated 18.01.2011, hence it is not possible for us to review the said order. As far as the second prayer is concerned, the learned APP on instructions states that show cause notice has been issued to the petitioner in relation to overstay wherein it is proposed to cut his remission. As show cause notice has been issued to the petitioner, it is open to him to reply to the same and point out the reasons for his overstay. After considering the reply of the petitioner, the concerned authorities to take the reply of the petitioner into consideration and thereafter dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. Writ Petition is disposed of in above terms. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.