CRLMB7424/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.7424/2010 Smt. Visso Vs. The State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor Date of Order ::: 04.08.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Himmat Singh Beekarwar, Counsel for petitioner Shri Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that allegation against petitioner, who is a female, is that she shut the door of the room where initially the prosecutrix met the co-accused Naveen. The prosecutrix, in her statement recorded under Section 164, Cr.P.C., has stated that she consented to have sex with Naveen. When Naveen did not agree to marry her, the criminal case was registered. It is contended that the petitioner, being a lady, is entitled to get the benefit of Section 437 Cr.P.C.; investigation is almost complete; petitioner is in jail for last 15 days. As per the the medical-report, the prosecutrix is about 17 years of age. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on its merits and demerits, I deem it just and proper to release the accused-petitioner, namely, Smt. Visso Wife of Heera Singh on bail CRLMB7424/2010 // 2 // under Section 439 Cr.P.C., in FIR No.133/2010, Police Station Atalband, District Bharatpur, for offence under Sections 323, 341, 376 IPC and Section 3(i)(xii) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court for her appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The bail application stands disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//