... 1 ... IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.25 OF 2006 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.59 OF 2003 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Mr Mhatungade holding for Mr Anturkar for the Applicant. CORAM CORAM CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATE DATE DATE : MARCH 16, 2006. : MARCH 16, 2006. : MARCH 16, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Reason mentioned in the Application is unacceptable. The Advocate on record is expected to make necessary arrangement to inform the court when the matter is called out about his personal difficulty. In the circumstances, no cause for restoration is made out. However, as the litigant should not suffer for the mistake of the Advocate, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) on condition that the Advocate for the Applicant shall personally pay Rs.750/- to the High Court, Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority within one week. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE