1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.02.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD).No.2445 of 2011 Boominathan ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police Pudukottai District Pudukottai 2. The Inspector of Police Aranthangi Police Station Pudukottai District ... Respondents (Crime No.780/10) PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the second respondent to expedite the investigation in CrimeNo 780 of 2010 and file the charge sheet. For Petitioner : Mr. D.Muruganantham For Respondents : Mr. L.Murugan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to expedite the investigation in Crime No. 780 of 2010 and to file the charge sheet. 2. Heard Mr. D.Muruganantham, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. L.Murugan, learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is running a petty shop and there was a dispute pending between the petitioner's co-brother and his brother-in-law in respect of the one property. He would further submit in his argument that during the dispute, the petitioner's brother-in-law, namely, Govinduraj, attacked the petitioner and therefore, the petitioner has lodged a complaint. He would further submit in his argument that the proposed accused has set fir in the petitioner's house and caused damage to the petitioner. He would also submit that initially, the action of the proposed accused was brought to the notice of the second respondent, who received the complaint and registered a case in Crime No. 780 of 2010 for the offences under Section 436 of IPC., and thereafter, the case is pending and the second respondent has not interested to investigte the case. Hence, the petitioner has given a representation to the first respondent highlighting the entire picture, but the same was not looked into by the first respondent also. Therefore, he would request the Court that a direction may be issued to the second respondent to complete the investigation and to file the final report in Crime No. 780 of 2010. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit in his argument that on the complaint given by the petitioner, a case has been registered in Crime No. 780 of 2010 for the offences under Section 436 of IPC., and the investigation will be expeditously done and it will be over soon and the final report will be filed very soon. 5. Considering the submissions made by both sides, this Court is inclined to record the submissions of the learned Government Advocate (Crl Side) and to direct the second respondent to investigate the case in Crime No. 780 of 2010 as expeditiously as possible and to file a final report, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the abovesaid direction, this Petition is disposed of. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(LA) /TRUE COPY/ Assistant Registrar To 1. The Superintendent of Police Pudukottai District Pudukottai 2. The Inspector of Police Aranthangi Police Station Pudukottai District 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai CRL.O.P.(MD).No.2445 of 2011 vsg PA/21.03.2011/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/