IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.9850 of 1997 Date of decision: 10.09.2009 Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology ...Petitioner versus Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Punjab, Chandigarh and another. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.KANNAN Present: Mr. Pawan Kumar Mutneja, Advocate with Mr. S.S.Sudan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. D.R.Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? ---- K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. The learned counsel for the management, Mr. Mutneja states that there had been a settlement between the parties and they have also signed the same. He seeks for setting aside the order of the Labour Court and for an order in terms of the settlement. 2. It has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondent that the settlement has been effected on 12.02.2009 and that the workman shall be also entitled to the benefits that have accrued to him subsequent to 01.07.2008. The learned counsel for the management states that the moment the settlement is recorded, the workman shall be given all the accrued benefits. The statement of the respective counsel are placed on record. Civil Writ Petition No.9850 of 1997 - 2 - 3. As ordered, the award of the Labour Court is set aside and the writ petition is allowed in terms of the settlement. This settlement forms part of this order (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 10.09.2009 sanjeev