IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5070 of 2010 MITHLESH YADAV, SON OF MADAN YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE IDINPUR, P.S. TEKARI, DISTRICT-GAYA. ………………………………………………………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………………OPPOSITE PARTY. ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Saxena, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, A.P.P. --------- 2. 9.3.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 447, 307, 504, 114/34 and later on added Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 27 of the Arms Act. As per the allegation, set up in the First Information Report, the petitioner had fired upon the deceased Nadlu Yadav injuring him on his neck and subsequently due to that he died. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is admitted land dispute between the parties due to which the said occurrence had taken place. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 4.5.2008. 2 Learned A.P.P. for the State submitted that the petitioner is the main assailant of the deceased as he was the person who had fired upon the deceased causing injury on his neck which was the cause of death. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case that the petitioner is stated to be the main assailant of the deceased, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner. As a result, this application is dismissed. However, the court concerned is directed to take every step for expeditious disposal of the trial. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)