IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2578 of 2005 ***** 1. Ram Bachchan Singh, son of Late Sardari Singh resident of village-Jatkhi Mathiya, P.S. Mani Bikramganj in the district of Rohtas. 2. Shivajee Singh son of Late Ramnandan Singh, resident of Village-Mani, P.S. Bikramganj in the district of Rohtas. 3. Rameshwar Singh son of Late Mundrika Singh, resident of Village-Basgitiya, P.O.- Jamodhi, P.S. Bikramganj in the district of Rohtas. 4. Ram Rahasya Singh son of Late Ram Chandra Singh, resident of Village+P.O.- Mani Bikramganj in the district of Rohtas. 5. Ram Suchit Singh, son of Late Raghutnath Singh, resident of Village-Kawai, P.O.-Emirta in the district of Rohtas. 6. Sant Bilash Singh son of Late Raspat Singh, resident of village-Karath, P.S.-Tarari, in the district of Bhojpur. 7. Chandrama Singh, son of Late Bhijhan Singh, resident of village+P.O.-Mani, P.S. Bikramganj in the district of Rohtas. 8. Kanhaiya Prasad Singh son of Late Bihari Singh, resident of village+P.O.-Mani, P.S. Bikramganj in the district of Rohtas. …. …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Superintendent of Education, Rohtas. 4. The District Provident Fund Officer, Rohtas. …. …. Respondents ----------- 7. 2.2.2009. After filing of the counter affidavit, learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that payment of difference of salary and G.P.F. has been made with regard to petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 6 and 7 but at least four other petitioners, namely, Rameshwar Singh, Ram Rahasya Singh, Ram Suchit Singh and Kanhaiya Prasad Singh are still awaiting payment of such amount from the respondents. The earlier counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent no.3, the District Superintendent of Education, Rohtas, was filed in May, 2006. The current status has not been stated with regard to the rest of the petitioners. The Court, therefore, disposes of the writ application with a - 2 - direction upon the District Superintendent of Education, Rohtas that in case payments have not yet been made to the petitioner nos. 3, 4, 5 and 8, then he shall take steps for authorization and payment to these petitioners also after due verification within a period of three months from the date of communication/production of a copy of this order. The Court does not record any observation with regard to payment of suspense amount in view of the fact that a categorical affidavit has been filed stating that there are no records and no teacher in the district of Rohtas has been paid any amount under this head. This aspect of the matter is left open for the petitioners to pursue after doing the necessary home work in this regard. The writ application is disposed of. Pawan/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)