IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-28391 of 2009 Date of decision:26.11.2009. Parshotam Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Kamaldip S. Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Arshvinder Singh, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Nitin Kant Setia, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2, 3 & 5. ***** S.D.ANAND, J. The parties to the impugned prosecution i.e. petitioners and respondent Nos.2, 3 & 5 have compounded the offences vide compromise dated 18.09.2009. Petitioners and respondent Nos.2, 3 & 5 are present in the Court and are identified by their respective counsel. They own up the compounding. They further state that presently there is no dispute subsisting between them. Their joint statement is also recorded separately. In the larger interest of the society and to enable the parties to maintain cordial relations, the petition shall stand allowed and FIR No.224 dated 29.08.2009, under Sections 452, 323, 324, 427, 506, 148. 149 IPC, P.S. Rajpura City, District Patiala (Annexure P-1) shall stand quashed on account of compounding. November 26, 2009 (S.D.ANAND) vinod* JUDGE