^ ( ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 3 ^2—200Z PETITIONER A,'s^ ^--:'p.^ ^^?-t:p ^.:^.y'' ^^r......"•" . ^- ^^'^ RESPONDENT Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corpn., Through : Manager, Ganj Line, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) eariier known as M.P. State Warehousing Corpn., for unified State of M.p] VERSUS Uttam Chimankar, S/o Heeraman, R/o Rahul Nagar, Janta Colony, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1....... A HIGH COUIfrQF CHHAmSOARH AT BILASBUR WmT PETITIQNNp, 362 of2003 PETmONER : Chhattisgarh State Warehousmg C@rpi. VER8US RE8PONDENT8 : UttamChimaiika-. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF BNDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri Satish K. Aeirihotol, J. Present: 8hriB,D.Ctam,AdvocateforthepetitionCT, Shri H.B.Agraw^l, Seaior Advocate with Ms. Pragya Sm^i, Advocate for the respond^nt QRALORUER (Passed on 18m day of March, 2010) 1. Leamed eounsel appearmg fbr tie petitkmCT, on instruetiom, sybmits that tihis petition has become infiructuoi^. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for olfaer side ctoes aot ceaata'ovett fhe above submission. 3. Accordmgly, fhe writ petition is disnaissed as having become infiitctuous. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aniit