CRM No. M 36683 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 36683 of 2010 Date of decision: 03.02.2011 Rishab ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: None for the petitioner Mr. Sidarth Sarup, DAG, Haryana Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the complainant -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed for quashing of the FIR on the basis of compromise. Vide order dated 22.12.2010, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court on 24.12.2010. Trial Court was also directed to record a finding whether any volunteer compromise has been arrived at between the parties or not. In pursuance to the same, Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurgaon, has submitted its report dated 29.01.2011 stating therein that no compromise has been arrived at between the parties. CRM No. M 36683 of 2010 2 Reply on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 2 has also been filed by the State in Court today. The same is taken on record. In view of the above, the present petition is not maintainable on the basis of compromise and as such the same is dismissed. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 03.02.2011 mohan