IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16793 of 2009 1. RAM BALAK SINGH S/O LATE PARICHHAN SINGH, R/O VILL FULAR, P.O- MANSOORPUR, P.S & DISTT- VAISHALI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY BIHAR STATE HINDU RELIGIOUS TRUST BOARD , PATNA 3. THE ADMINISTRATOR CUM SPECIAL SECRETARY, BIHAR STATE REGLIGIOUS TRUST BOARD, VIDYA PATI MARG, PATNA 4. ANCHAL ADHIKARI, ANCHAL OFFICE, VAISHALI, AT HAJIPUR ----------- 02. 10.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for the Bihar State Religious Trust. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the amount mentioned in the impugned order dated 12.8.2009, but proposes to represent for a proper and regular settlement in his favour. There is no occasion for the Court to make any observation on any proposed course of action which may or may not fructify. In what manner, any application of the petitioner is to be considered has to be decided by the Board itself, but of course in consonance with the law. Needless to state that the petitioner shall be liable under the aforesaid order only for period of occupation and cannot be saddled with any liabilities for a period that he may not be in occupation after vacating the premises. 2 The application is disposed in the aforesaid terms. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)