IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17762 of 2010 GYAN PRAKASH SAH @ KARAILA & ANR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 21.5.2010 Heard. The case has been registered under section 450 of the IPC and it is contended that there is a dispute for the property between the parties. It appears from order dated 3.4.2010 passed in same Bail Petition bearing B.P. No. 183(B) of 2010 that the petitioner had been admitted to bail and was directed to furnish bond of a particular amount and surety. The hearing was adjourned to produce the case diary. The case diary was produced and after hearing the parties, learned Additional Sessions judge, Bagaha dismissed the prayer for bail of the petitioners recording that the petitioners and others had entered inside the house of the informant with a view to apprehend Dr. Ghanshyam Singh for the purposes of kidnapping and murder. As pointed out just now, there is a dispute for property between the parties, one of whom is admittedly the employer of the informant. Contention was also, by placing reliance on the order dated 20.4.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 11095 of 2010, that repeated cases are being filed by the employer of the informant through the informant under serious offences. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioners 2 Gyan Prakash Sah alias Karaila and Bhikham yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5000/(five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Bagaha in Bagaha (Pathkhauli) P.S. Case no. 387 of 2009. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)