(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 10546 OF 2010 1. Smt. Ratnprabha w/o. Ramesh Kanchar, Age : 42 years, Occupation : Household, R/o. Chokhalthan, Taluka : Kannad, District : Aurangabad. 2. Smt. Sushilabai w/o. Ramesh Kanchar, Age : 40 years, Occupation : Household, R/o. Padhegaon, Taluka : Aurangabad, District : Aurangabad. .. Petitioners. versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, Social and Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32. 2. The District Collector, Aurangabad, District : Aurangabad. .. Respondents. ....................... (2) Mr. M.G. Kolse Patil, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. D.R. Korde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 and 2. ........................ CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 11TH JANUARY 2011 COURT'S ORDER : 1. The matter is called out on third occasion. Mr. M.G. Kolse Patil, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, now states that file is not with him and is seeking adjournment. 2. Mr. D.R. Korde, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondent nos.1 and 2, has pointed out judgment of Division Bench of this Court, in the case of Girish Kanaiyalal Munshi Vs. Nil (AIR 2008 Bombay 136), which holds that a woman litigant filing petition for grant of probate of will is not exempted from payment of court fees. 3. In view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Court, cited supra, the belated request made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, for adjournment, is rejected. (3) 4. The controversy here, is about issuance of legal heirship certificate. I find that the judgment, cited supra, covers the controversy. 5. Petition is, therefore, dismissed. ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE ......................... bgp/wp10546