IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29220 of 2010 SATISH KUMAR KEWAT @ SATISH KEWAT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03 01.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Admittedly, the victim had been recovered from the house of one Jamuna Prasad and not from the possession of the petitioner. No doubt, when the statement of victim was recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C, she stated that she was taken by the petitioner and she was kept in a house by the petitioner for the period of one month and in the said house, petitioner established sexual relationship with her but there is some contradictions in the statement of victim as well as in the written report of her husband. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there was love affair between victim and petitioner and, as a matter of fact, victim had voluntarily gone along with the petitioner. He further submitted that subsequently when victim was recovered, she was tutored and that is why she made her statement before court against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, petitioner, namely, Satish Kumar Kewat @ Satish Kewat, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions 2 Judge-III, Patna in connection with Sessions Trial No. 714 of 2010 arising out of Punpun P.S. Case No. 158 of 2009. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)