IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15829 of 2011 Anand Rajbhar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 3. 10.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased and there is allegation that he committed the dowry death of his wife by administering poison to her. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the deceased was suffering from Anemia and as a matter of fact she died of her aliment and after giving the information to the family members of the deceased, the dead body of the deceased was cremated in their presence and having considered the aforesaid fact this Court has already granted privilege of bail to parents of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid submissions as well as facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 336/2010 /S. Tr. 10/2011 arising out of Buxar (M) P.S. Case No. 117 of 2010 pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. III, Buxar stands rejected. However, the learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner. Saif (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)