IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 19TH OCTOBER 2010 / 27TH ASWINA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 993 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.2727/2010 Dated 28/01/2010 .................... PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SAJEEV.V.KURIAKOSE,S/O.KURIAKOSE, AGED 46 YEARS,GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR,VALEATH HOUSE, KADAYIRUPPU,KOLENCHERRY-682311. BY ADV. SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.DEEPU LAL MOHAN SMT.LEENA MURALI RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- A.J.MATHAI, AGE(NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER),S/O.(NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY,OLLUKKARA BLOCK PANCHAYATH,THRISSUR. ADV. SRI.K.B.MOHANDAS FOR R SRI.LELLULAL T.G.THUNDATHIL FOR R THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/10/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ Contempt Case (C) NO. 993 OF 2010 (S) =========================== Dated this the 19th day of October, 2010 J U D G M E N T After the filing of this contempt petition, it is seen from Ext.R1(b) order issued by the respondent that he has taken a decision to relieve the petitioner from the contractual obligations subject to the concurrence of the Project Director. Thus, as far as the respondent is concerned, a decision has ben taken in compliance with the direction, and therefore, the contempt petition is closed leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue the matter before the Project Director. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp