IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23147 of 2009 BHABHIKHAN MAHATO @ BHABAIKSHAN MAHATO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04. 08. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner was only a member of the mob. Grievance was prevailing against the victim that his bus was used for taking injured of an incident which took place in the village on the same day to a Hospital and the victim was on way to hospital to take care of his bus. But in the way he was assaulted. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, there is an allegation of snatching a Titan watch against accused Lakhinder Mahato. Co-accused Yogendra Mahato, Shiv Pujan Mahato caught hold the informant and co- accused Biresh Mahto assaulted the informant by the bat of spade. Though allegations have been levelled against other co- accused persons, but the petitioner is apprehending his arrest. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest/surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional 2 Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Motihari in connection with Chhauradano (Mahuawa) P.S. Case No. 11/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. SKBOSE (Mandhata Singh)