IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 19TH MARCH 2010 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1931 WP(C).No. 4476 of 2010(H) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- SAJI V.PROPRIETOR, KARTHIKA CABLES, BHOOTHAKULAM, PARAVOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.PRATHEESH.P RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- THE SECRETARY, PARAVUR MUNICIPALITY, PARAVUR, KOLLAM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).4476/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 19th day of March, 2010 JUDGMENT Petitioner claims to be a cable T.V. Operator within the area of the respondent Municipality. According to the petitioner, he along with six other cable T.V. Operators approached the respondent Municipality for granting licence for laying cable poles along the Municipal road sides. It is stated that their applications are pending and at the same time, certain other operators have laid cable unauthorizedly. 2. In this writ petition, the main grievance of the petitioner is regarding pendency of their applications for licence. If as stated by the petitioner such applications have been received and are pending, there is no reason why the respondent shall not pass orders on the applications. 3. Therefore, I dispose of this writ petition directing the respondent to consider and pass orders on the application if any W.P.(C).4476/10 2 that has been received. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs