IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-4398 of 2010 Date of Decision:6.4.2010 Bhupinder Singh @ Bhinda .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Vikram Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral) It is an admitted case of the prosecution that the petitioner was neither arrested at the spot nor any recovery was effected from him. It was further stated that there is no basis for implication but he has been implicated only on the suspicion as he was named by the co-accused saying that the contraband is being supplied by the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Balraj Singh states that no other evidence is forth coming as yet. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar. 6.4.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE