IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH APRIL 2007 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1929 R.P.No. 115 of 2007(G) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.1328/2007 Dated 23/01/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/6TH RESPONDENT: --------------------------------- T.C.SUBRAMANIAN, AGED 42, S/O.CHANDRAN, THUNDATHIL HOUSE, MURIKKUMPADAM, PUTHUVYPPU. BY ADV. SRI.K.S.MADHUSOODANAN SRI.T.N.SURESH SRI.K.B.SUJAI KUMAR SRI.T.V.JAYAKUMAR NAMBOODIRI RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS 1 TO 11 & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 5: ----------------------------------------------------- 1. NARAYANAN, AGED 43, S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN, ALINKAL HOUSE, SOUTH PUTHUVYPPU, VYPIN. 2. ABDUL MAJEED, AGED 38, ELAMTHURUTHIL HOUSE, SOUTH PUTHUVYPPU, VYPIN. 3. SABU, KUNNUKUZHIYIL HOUSE, SOUTH PUTHUVYPPU, VYPIN. 4. C.P.BABU, AGED 44, S/O.PAPUNNI, CHULLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, DO. 5. MADHU M.S., AGED 35, S/O.SADANANDAN, MANAKKAL HOUSE, THOPPIL, DO. 6. SUMESH, AGED 28, S/O.CLEETUS, CANSIS HOUSE, DO. 7. SHYLESH K.F., AGED 28, S/O.FRANCIS, KALLARAKKAL HOUSE, DO. 8. KUNJAPPAN, AGED 40, S/O.KESAVAN, CHAKKALATHARA HOUSE, DO. 9. V.M.JAYAN, S/O.MOHANAN, VETTATHIPARAMBU HOUSE, DO. R.P.NO.115/2007 IN WPC NO.1328/2007 -2- 10. XAVIER A.J., AGED 24, AKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE DO. DO. 11. RAJU V.V., S/O. MOHANAN, VALARKODY HOUSE, DO. 12. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY HOME AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 13. THE C.I. OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE NARAKKAL CIRCLE OFFICE, NARAKAL. 14. THE S.I. OF POLICE, NARAKKAL POLICE STATION, NARAKKAL. 15. THE REGIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. 16. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.ANTONY JOSEPH R12 TO 16 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI P.A.SALIM THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.B. KOSHY and K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JJ. ---------------------------- R.P. No. 115 of 2007 IN W.P.(C)No.1328 of 2007G ---------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of April, 2007 Order Koshy, J. This review petition is filed by the sixth respondent in the judgment under review. If there is a conciliation statement, work should be carried out as per the settlement. If the review petitioner is aggrieved, he can approach the labour authorities or if there is violation of the settlement, appropriate remedies are provided under the Industrial Disputes Act and our police protection order will not, in any way, infringe his rights. The review petition is dismissed. J.B.KOSHY JUDGE K.P.BALACHANDRAN JUDGE vaa W.P.(C).No./2007 2 J.B. KOSHY AND K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JJ. -------------------------- R.P. No.115/2007 IN W.P.(C)NO.1328/2007-G -------------------------- ORDER Dated:12th April, 2007