IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11807 of 2010 SRI SHESHNATH PANDEY S/O LATE SRI DEEP NARAYAN PANDEY R/O SURTAPUR, P.O.- SAISAR GARARI, P.S.- DINARA, DISTT.- ROHTAS, AT PRESENT- C/O NEVIDITA SINGH, RAJIV NAGAR, ROAD NO. 6-B, POST- KESHARI NAGAR, PATNA-24 ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COLLECTOR, E.CHAMPARAN. 2. JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, ADAPTIVE RESEARCH BIHAR, PATNA. 3. DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 4. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, (SEED ANALYSIS BIHAR PATNA),RASAYAN BHAWAN, MITHAPUR FARM CAMPUS. 5. ASSISTANT SEED TESTING OFFICER, RAJKIYA SEED TESTING LABORATORY, MOTIHARI, EAST CHAMPARAN. 6. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. 7. DISTRICT PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, E.CHAMPARAN. 8. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 28.7.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 30th of November, 2009 from the post of Agriculture Inspector while working under respondent no.5, no retiral dues have been settled, save and except the payment of leave encashment amount, despite representation. Learned counsel for the State submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall be considered as per law at the earliest. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a 2 representation before the Director of Agriculture, Patna (respondent no.3), with a copy to the Assistant Seed Testing Officer, Rajkiya Seed Testing Laboratory, Motihari, East Champaran (respondent no.5). The petitioner also proposes to file a separate representation before the District Provident Fund Officer, East Champaran (respondent no.7) with regard to the payment of provident fund dues. In case such representations are filed stating distinctly the details of all his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, respondents no.3 and 7 shall consider the respective grievances of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled to enable him to receive his pensionary benefits. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)