CWP No.6991 of 2009 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. Date of decision: 24.02.2010 Parmila Kumari ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI Present: Mr.SK Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.RS Kundu, Addl.AG., Haryana, for the respondents. PERMOD KOHLI, J. (Oral): The petitioner is working as JBT Teacher and she is claiming promotion to the post of Science Master. The stand of the respondents is that the selection of the petitioner is the subject matter of investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation. Similar issue came up for consideration before a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Virender Redhu and others Vs. State of Haryana and others, (CWP No.17219 of 2007 and other connected matters) decided on 05.03.2009. On consideration of the matter by this Court, the following observations have been made:- “In the circumstances, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents that in case ultimately it is held that the original appointments of the petitioner as JBT Teachers was not tainted, the respondents will consider their case/s from the due date within three months from the date of finalization as mentioned above. Counsel for the respondents states that as of now no CWP No.6991 of 2009 2 promotion of any batch junior to the petitioner has been made. In the circumstances, it is directed that in case any promotions are made subsequently, the promotion orders will contain a stipulation that the said promotions would be subject to the rights of the petitioner. It is further clarified that the claim of the petitioner for consequential benefits, if ay, person from a batch junior to them is promoted would be considered from the said date.” Let the case of the petitioner be also considered in the light of the aforesaid directions and consequential relief, if any, be granted to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is made available to the competent authority. Petition disposed of. 24.02.2010 (PERMOD KOHLI) BLS JUDGE