IK; E &' HJGHGOURTOFGHHAmSGARHATBIl.ASPUR DIV1SIONBENCH CORAM: MON'BLESHRt RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. HON'BLESHRIRANGiSiAtHGHANDRAKAR.J ADpellant Ciaimant ResDondents MiscApDeal N6.106 OT2005. Smt Shanti Bat, aged about 45 years, Wd/o L.ate Sukhlal, by caste, Sondhiya, r/6 Gourela.'P^ Gourela; Tehsil Pendra Road, District Btlaspur (CG) Versus , 1 Ramswaroop aged 36 years S/o SuRhlal, by caste Panika, Truck driver, TrucK No.CPA 3270, rto Balco AmarKantak, DiStrict Shahdol 2 KP Pillai, eontraGtor, S/o Shridhar resident of Balco Amai-kantak, Truck Owner No.CPA 3270 3 Qriental Insurance Gompany Limited, Through Branch Manager,j Qriental Insurance Company Limited, Bilaspur MemorandumOfMiscKDBealunderSectiOn 173oftheMotoT VsfticSeAcfc 1988 Present : Shri Rakesh Sahu, counsel Tor theappellant. | ShriSaurabhSharma,counse!forrespondentNo,3. ORDER ;:<: •: .:::: (23rdAugust,2Q10) The foilcwing order of the Coyrt was^^^^^^^ p ^Rajeev-Qupta.G.J. ...'l.'..l:.-.,: .;• ::,1, :; • - : :: i ;• 1 ,• Appellaht Smt Shanti Baj Is seeking enhance!Rignt[iof the compensatiQH au^ed by the Motor Acadent ClairBS^'TFtbynai, ^''.1 ., ''%: f£ . '". V % ''9 ff v<s?"s^ '-'^KBS.S subbu \n though the deduction in that behalf could have been to the extent of 50% as there were only two personsl dependent on the incomeof the deceased i.e. the deceased himself and his mother claimant SmtShantiBai. 8) The claimant cannot have any legitimate grievance about the selection of multiplierof 18 by the Tribunal, as it is the highest multiplier prescribed in the Second Schedule under Section 163-A ofthe MotorVehicle Act. • 9) For the foregolng reasons, we do not flnd any scope for enhancementof thecompensatlonawarded by the Tribuna!. 10) The appeal flled by the appeilant / claimant for enhancement of the compensation, therefore, Is liable to be dismlssed and is herebydismissed. 11) No orderastocosts. ^/) Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Rangnath Cnandrakari JiitSge 1 -i1 'ipitiTiS'EiIE;?;T^-C^^^.^— ^