IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2011 / 30TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19816 of 2011(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- RANIMOL A.K., D/O.KURIAKOSE KURUVILLA, AYROOR HOUSE, MALAKUNNAM POST, KURICHY VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.KURUVILLA JACOB SMT.RAJI.P.JOY RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PRIYADARSHINI HILL POST, PIN - 685060, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSHINI HILL POST, PIN - 685060, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.19816/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE HALL TICKET DT NIL BEARING NO.1301667 ISSUED TO PETITIONER FROM THE OFFICE OF SECOND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY of THE COMPUTER PRINT OF PETITIONER'S MARK LIST PUBLISHED BY M.G.UNIVERSITY IN CONNECTION WITH HER B.COM DEGREE EXAMINATIONS HELD DURING MARCH/APRIL 2011. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE PRESCRIBED APPLICATION FORM DT 4.7.11 DULY FILLED BY PETITIONER AND FORWARDED TO 2ND RESPONDENT FOR REVALUATION OF HER ANSWER PAPERS CONNECTED WITH THE TWO FAILED SUBJECTS. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF TH EPAY IN SLIP DT 4.7.11 OBTAINED BY PETITIONER FROM M.G.UNIVERSITY WHILE REMITTING THE REVALUATION FEE OF RS.500. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF PETITIONER'S COVERING LETTER DT 8.7.11 FORWARDED TO 2ND RESPONDENT BY SPEED POST ALONG WITH PHOTOSTAT COPY OF EXT.P1 AND THE ORIGINAL OF EXT.P2 AND P3. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 19816 OF 2011 (B) ===================== Dated this the 21st day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Com Degree Course. When the final year results were declared, she had failed in Business Statistics under Part-III and Computer Application in Business-II under Part- III. She applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp