^T^'/'®0^ ss mTHBmGatXnJICTOrCSHBEATTESCiASH ATfilLASPUR WRWTSS'SVSOS^ s.^AJi f2006 I'ElanoNiER [:lJ^%^^ .^iil ^a^ /-••LN)^>" ^-'^ ^•^\w ^.^- ^ ItECStVED-CO^ ~^s^ eueitKfcK: a,AS»t» @E\®NpRA TTWARi S/Q. SHRI N.P.TTWARI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEAR8, LOWER DFVISIQN TEACHER, SHRI RAM MIDDI.E SCHOQI^ MAHASAMUND, R/^@. IMLIBHATHA, MAHASAMUND, TAHSIL AND DISTRIGT MAHASAMUND(C.G.), .viaisus ••;i:'::'.:'.:.-:'::\ ''•• RE^roNo®!^ JI^^A m^ :® •' . - : • : .'»<••:•:;:.-': •.. . • • ••'".'.. 1";;'..': ., ; : , THROIJGH SEE;8ETARY, DEPARMENT OF SGHOOL f !.; • '.~ : .. ; : .: '\:' ' ' 1: EDUGAnON, DKS BHAWAN, RAIPUR(C.G.) ^:2) DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, MAHASAMUND(C.G.) :3) BLOCK EDUCA'HQN OFFIGER, MAHASAMUND, MAHASAMUND (C.<3.) ©ISTRICT WRTrPENKWlDfilTO^AKrna^S 326^227 OFTHEe<3»S^ffi<J'l^®((^IF^ tIA /^s^ l a <»UKTO]FeHHAmSGARBATBILASP(JR W. R. (st Wb. 5114of 2006 Petitioner : DcveadraTiwari. Versus Respoiiden.ts : State ofChhfittis^arh & others Sin^e Bench: Honlate Mr. Justk«SaUiai K. Agdliotrt. •Q 1. ..^-' Scat. Haauda SMdquc, Advocate ftn- ttic Pelittoncr. ShriUtlEarshVerma,GovtAdvDcatefi>rifajeS<ate/i?espoiMlents. ORDE8 (27& Octobcr, 3006^ Leamcd counsel Eypearing for the petttioitcr submits that wfafle Woikiag ^^ Assistaat Teaeher, fhc petittoner had gone on tiaion^ to im.|Hiove his qualifications on his own escpensea and acquircd B. Ed. Examination Ccrtifteate priorto l.3.1999. Ssxseadias to tearued couDsel for fhc gctitioae!r, fte petitioner is enditled to two ad^aiice incrcments iaview of the deeisiou trffflus Co'urt in fhe casc of Yashwaut Kumar Bhatadwai Vs. Municroal CorpWation. Dura aiMl another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}. This Court ia tfae case ofYashwant Kumar BhafaA^ YS. Mutucipal Coipotatioai, Durg and another (SupBE^, canK to the conchisitMa: ftiat thc tcachers, who had obtamed B. Ed. /B.T.l. ExammatibBL Certificate on tfaeir own expcnscs, are covered by fhc Ciicular dated 24.12.98 (Anricxure P/7) fasued by fhe State Gtwcnuaent of Madliya Pradesh. 3. Further in the matterofSmt.MnnnrnniaSIuw^tavaVs.Stateof jW^P_ari_o^^ t2000(1) M.P.4S.R. 136 )fliBMadttyaPradesh State Admuustratnw Tribimal, GwaliiM- Bcach, wlute conMlerin® fhc cireular/dated 1.3.1999 wherem, it is prsivided that fhe Assistaat Teacheis, who hawe acquiced B.Ed. degree at flieir own cbst betwerai 23.10.1964 aud 7.5.1973 shaUbecntitled to t«n> alvaace increiacnts, teU^ oa decision in fhe case of RBkcsh Kunaar SlU-ivastava Vs. State of M.P. & others ^aseS. ia O.A.No. 1632/99, decidcd on 12.10.1999 whCTcm it is obaervcd fhat Ac ctecular dated 1.3.1999 eannot be made qppUcable retoospcctwefy. Thus, a teactaier, may be Assistant Teacher, who has obtained B.Ed. deyee befeie l.3.1999 is entiUed to two aivance uicrements, 4. .-^ ./. 0 It is poiated out by teamed ctinnsel appeanag for fhe petitioner tfaat fhc fhen Statc <rf Maithya Pradesli hai •Bted a Special Lcaue PetiiBon. against fhe oiders passed by fhc Tifliuxirit and fhc HonTalc Supreme Court dismissed Speeaal fceaye Pfctition No. 1999/2000 fited a^unat ttie otdtsr of ttieTnbuual Thetefiati, fhe duectfon to ttic efifect fliat fhe ciicular datcd 1.3.1999 caxinot be made applkablc rctiospecthrefy, passed by tfac Tribunal, becomes fiaal aDd the sanie aVtaO. be appMcable to aU the AsstetaatT^cheis who laave obtained B.Ed./B.T.I. exnminntinn cia^ificate befoni 1.3.1999. It is furfhcr substaatiatal by a cncuter dated 17.10.2003 issued by fhe ptcsent Stete of Madliya Pcadesh v^herein fhe cacular cleaity states about ffie decision o£ tbe SupBcnic Gourfc ^ 5.'l ^ Leamed couasel for fhc pctittoner further submits ibsat fhc fac'ts and question of tew involved ia fhe pieseat case are aqiiarety covered by decision offhs Court ia thc case of Yashwant Kuiaar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corpoiation, Durg and another (Supra), to WhiGh teamed eoiunsel appeariag for fhe icspondeiits •fairty concedes and agrces with fhc avennent Buade by feamcd counsd appearing for fhe petitioiier. 6. Accordingty, fhe writ petition is attowed in tenns of thc ordcr passcd iu thc case ofYastiwaat Kumar Bharadwq Vs. Maaicipal Corpotation, Durg axid anofher (Supr's^, subject to verifieation of fhc fact as to whethier the petiyDner has aoquixcd B. Bd. Exammation Certificate on his own expenses and ftuTflierwIiefh.cr he has been psmi two advance mcrements or BDt. No oxder as to costs. ____-——~\ SafchK.AgBib»m \ Thakt.tr