IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.19350 of 2010 MD. SALIM son of Suleman Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 03.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Sections 448, 376, 493/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel submits that in fact compromise has entered into between the parties and the marriage of the informant has been solemnized with the petitioner. In support of his submission, learned counsel has referred to Annexure-3. He further submits that the informant appeared before the Sessions Court and also admitted the factum of compromise, as contained in Annexure-3. In view of the aforesaid fact that petitioner has solemnized marriage with the informant, petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Palasi P.S. case no. 100 of 2008. In case, the aforesaid fact is not correct, the informant would be at liberty to file application before the learned court below itself for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)