1 Ash FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 688 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5658 OF 2004 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.689 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5659 OF 2004 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 690 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6017 OF 2004 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Shri S.M. Gorwadkar for the Applicant. Shri A.P. Vanarase for the Respondent. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 4TH MARCH, 2010 P.C.: . The Applicant who is the Respondent in the Writ Petition has filed this application. The Applicant is the landlord and the Respondent in the application (Petitioner in Writ Petition) is the tenant. Prayers in these applications are for a direction against the Respondent/Tenant to deposit the amount of compensation at the market value and for appointment of a Court Receiver. Perusal of the record shows that at the time of hearing as to admission of the Writ Petition, 2 the Applicant ( Respondent in the Writ Petition ) was heard and interim relief was granted after hearing the Advocate for the Applicant. Except for the fact that the Writ Petitions are not heard for final disposal, no change in the circumstances is brought on record. Granting relief in these applications will amount to modification of an order granting interim relief after hearing both the parties. Hence, as of today, no case is made out for grant of any relief. The Applications are rejected. If Writ Petitions are ready for final hearing, the same shall be placed for final hearing board of 5th April, 2010. (A.S.OKA, J)