1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO.3299 OF 2011 Mohd.Jamaluddin Khan .. Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Ramesh Dube-Patil i/by M/s.Jay & Co.for the petitioner. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE: 17th November, 2011. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. It is common ground that after registration of FIR against the petitioner, the matter was investigated and the chargesheet is filed before the concerned Court. 2. It will be pre-mature to accept the stand of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in the said offence. The grounds taken in the petition to substantiate the fact that the petitioner has been falsely implicated by the concerned police officer, will be a matter of defence available to the petitioner in the pending criminal case against him. It is only after the trial Court were to accept that defence and record clean acquittal, the petitioner would be 2 entitled to contend that he was falsely implicated by the concerned police officer. It is only in that situation it may become necessary to inquire into against the concerned police officer. 3. As aforesaid, the basis on which the petitioner has approached this Court and the nature of relief claimed is pre-mature, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the relief as claimed for in this petition, after the final decision of the Court of competent jurisdiction in the criminal case pending against him. Petition is disposed of. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)