IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-17916 of 2011 (O&M). Date of decision: December 08, 2011. Sandeep .. Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana .. Respondent * * * CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI * * * PRESENT Mr.Neeraj Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Sushma Chopra, Addl. A.G., Haryana. M.M.S.BEDI, J (ORAL). It is claimed that material witness Sahun has already been examined. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has also turned hostile. Vinod an eye-witness also stands examined. He is stated to have not supported the case of prosecution. State counsel has submitted that there are three other cases pending against the petitioner. It has been informed that the petitioner is on bail in those cases. Since both the material witnesses to prove robbery have not supported the prosecution case, in view of said circumstances, the petitioner can be granted the concession of regular bail. Without expression of any opinion on merits of the case, the petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE December 08, 2011. rka . . . 1