THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No.4313 of 2009 ORDER: Being not satisfied with passing of any orders on I.A.No.1989 of 2008 in O.S.No.277 of 2005 by the learned II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, the present revision has been preferred. Revision petitioner herein is the plaintiff and the respondents herein are the defendants in the suit. Plaintiff filed suit in O.S.No.277 of 2005 seeking for declaration, recovery of possession and mesne profits. The evidence of plaintiff was closed and the suit was posted for evidence of the defendants and the defendants filed their affidavits of examination-in-chief. Thereafter, the defendants came up with the present petition seeking to appoint an Advocate-Commissioner to cross-examine them as they are unable to move due to fracture in the hip. As the learned Judge has not passed any orders in the petition impugned herein, the plaintiff has approached this Court and filed the present petition. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that it would suffice if a direction is issued to the Court below to dispose of the I.A.No.1989 of 2008 within a period of six weeks and further, the suit also shall be disposed of within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is disposed of. ____________ 17-09-2009 Kvrk/rkk THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No.4313 of 2009 17th September 2009