IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 15838 of 2009 Between: 1 Chunchula Komuraiah, S/o. Mallaiah, Hindu, in State Bank of India, R/o. Siva Nagar, Warangal. 2 Chunchula Sirish Kumar, S/o. Komuraiah, R/o. Ranga Saipet, Warangal. 3 Chunchula Harish Kumar, S/o. Komuraiah, R/o. Sivanagar, Warangal. 4 Chunchula Menakha, W/o. Santosh KUmar, R/o. Kesamudram, Warangal. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Superdent of Police, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 2 Deputy Superdent of Police, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 3 Sri Shobha Kumar, Law and Order, P.S. Hanamkonda, Warangal City. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents not to interfere witht the petitioners daily life either at petitioners residences or place of work and not to summon the petitioners to the police station Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.A.R.SESHAGIRI RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA Writ Petition No.15838 OF 2009 ORDER: 1 The petitioners approached this court and filed the present Writ Petition stating that the respondents herein are unnecessarily harassing them and are directing them to appear before the Police station without registering any crime against them. 2 On instructions from the third respondent the learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that the police officials have never interfered with the petitioners’ daily life either at their place of residence or at the place of their work and it is also stated that the police officials did not summon the petitioners to the Police station at any time. 3 In the light of the said submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader this court is of the view that no orders can be passed in this Writ Petition. However, it is made clear that if the respondents particularly the third respondent needs the presence of the petitioners in connection with any crime, he may do so only after registering a crime against the petitioners. 4 The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. ------------------ 12.08.2009 kvsn