IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43143 of 2010 1. RAM LAKHAN RAVIDAS SON OF BHAROSA RAVIDAS 2. OM PRAKASH MOCHI @ OM PRAKASH RAVIDAS SON OF RAM LAKHAN RAVIDAS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NIMA P.S. DHANARUA, DISTRICT- PATNA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- FOR THE PETITIONERS : MR. DHIRENDRA KUMAR SINHA, ADVOCATE FOR THE STATE : MR. RAM PRIYA SHARAN SINGH, ADDITIONAL. P.P. ***** 3 01.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. It is submitted that the allegation of killing the daughter of the informant as alleged in the first information report is not correct which would be appearing on perusal of the petition filed by the informant in the Court below to the effect that her daughter died due to the ailment of diarrhoea. Learned counsel for the State on perusal of the case diary submits that the materials have come in the diary supporting the allegations made in the first information that the daughter of the informant was used to be tortured for the demand of dowry. Be that as it may, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is accordingly rejected. However, in case petitioners on surrender in the court below makes an application for grant of bail, the same be considered in accordance with law on its own merit without being prejudiced by the present order. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)