IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 16TH JUNE 2008 / 26TH JYAISHTA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 413 of 2007() ---------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18/11/2006 IN CRMP 620/2006 IN SC.685/2005 of ADDL. SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC) III, PALAKKAD .................... REVN. PETITIONER: PETITIONER --------------------------- C.T. ABOOBACKER, S/O.AHAMMEDKUTTY, AGED 42 YEARS, CHOYATHALA HOUSE, KARIPARAMBA, UGRAPURAM, AREEKODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.K.JAYASOORIAN SRI.P.M.KUNJIMOIDEENKUTTY SRI.P.A.MOHAMMED ASHROF SRI.LAL K.JOSEPH SRI.A.A.ZIYAD RAHMAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C.B.C.I.D., KOZHIKODE. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.P.RAVINDRA BABU THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.RAMKUMAR, J. ====================================== CRL.R.P. NO.413 OF 2007 ====================================== Dated this the 16th day of June 2008 ORDER Petitioner, who is the 5th accused in S.C.685/2005 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court (Fast Track III) Palakkad challenges the order dated 18.11.2006 passed by the trial judge dismissing the petition (CMP 620/2006) filed by the petitioner seeking his discharge. 2. The petitioner and 7 others have been charge sheeted by the CB CID, Kozhikode in Crime No.167/1996 of Kollengode Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 153A, 364, 449, 302, 109, 120 B read with Section 34 IPC. 3. After hearing the petitioner and after perusing the prosecution records, the trial judge has found a prima facie case for proceeding against the petitioner for the aforementioned offences except the offence punishable under Section 153A IPC. This Court sitting in revision will be loath to interfere with the satisfaction reached by the trial judge after perusing the prosecution records. I, therefore, do not find any ground to CRRP 413/2007 2 interfere with the order passed by the trial court. It is needless to mention that the petitioner shall be entitled to raise all defences available to him before the court below during the trial of the case. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE css/