IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2010 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 37374 of 2010(V) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. KEVIN JACOB, AGED 23 YEARS, PAYYAMPALLIL HOUSE, KIZHAKKENMUTHOOR, KUTTAPPUZHA P.O., TIRUVALLA - 689103 (REG.NO.11560) 2. AJITH SREENATH AGED 23 YEARS, SREERAGHAM HOUSE, KIDANGOOR P.O., VENGOOR (REG.NO.11532) 3. JANISBEN BINO, AGED 23 YEARS, MECKAMALIL HOUSE, METHALA P.O., KURUPPAMPADY (VIA) PIN - 683545 (REG.NO.11554) 4. JASHIR K.M. AGED 23 YEARS, C/O.KEVIN JACOB, PAYYAMPALLIL HOUSE, KIZHAKKENMUTHOOR KUTTAPPUZHA P.O., TIRUVALLA - 689103 (REG. NO.11555) 5. KEERTHI KRISHNAN K.C.,AGED 23 YEARS, VADAKKEKOVILAKAM KANJOOR P.O. KALADY - 683575,(REG.NO.11559) 6. ABIN GEORGE, AGED 23 YEARS, MULAVARICKAL HOUSE, AANNAPPARA P.O. ANGAMALY (REG.NO.11531) 7. TANIYA ELSA SHAJI, AGED 23 YEARS, C/O.HAZNATH P.A. PADINJARECHALIL HOUSE, ELAMAKKARA P.O., DESHABHIMANI, COCHIN-682026. (REG.NO.11584) 8. SREJITH P.A.AGED 23 YEARS, C/O.ABNER GEORGE, ALUMKAL HOUSE, 63/46, NEAR RADHA OIL MILL ROAD,PACHALAM P.O., KOCHI - 682012. REG.NO.11581) svs ............2/-... ....2.... 9. NEERAJ VIJAY AGED 23 YEARS, ANASWARA HOUSE, NEAR FACT MARKET,UDYOGAMANDAL P.O., ERNAKULAM (REG.NO.11567) BY ADV. SRI.JAISON JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM – 686 001. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNVERSITY, KOTTAYAM – 686 001. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.T.A.SHAJI, SC., MG UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs/ ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.37374 of 2010 ------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of December, 2010. J U D G M E N T Petitioners have completed the third semester of Master of Business Administration (M.B.A.). When the result of the 1st Semester examinations were declared, the petitioners failed in many subjects. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 6 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge. ami/