THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.29684 of 2011 Dated 08th November, 2011 Between: Bathina Srinivasa Rao …Petitioner And The Additional Agent to the Government, Rampachodavaram, East Godavari District and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri K.Venkatesh Counsel for respondents: GP for Social Welfare The Court made the following: ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that even though the stay application filed before respondent No.5 in the revision filed against the order, dated 30.09.2011, in C.M.A.No.2 of 2011, passed by respondent No.1, is pending and no order has been passed thereon, respondent No.3 is seeking to evict him from the land in question. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare, I am of the opinion that interests of justice would be met if respondent No.5 is directed to dispose of the revision petition in a time bound manner and to direct respondent No.3 not to interfere with the petitioner’s possession of property comprised in D.No.1-148 in Survey No.125 of Rampachodavaram Village and Mandal, East Godavari District, till the disposal of the revision petition. Accordingly, respondent No.5 is directed to dispose of the revision petition within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving notice to the petitioner, and respondent No.3 is restrained from dispossessing the petitioner from the above-mentioned property till the disposal of the revision petition by respondent No.5. Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.36767 of 2011 is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 08th November, 2011 VGB