(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 379 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 379 OF 2005 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 379 OF 2005 Transport Corporationof India Ltd. and Ors ...Petitioners Versus Inspector under Bombay Shops and Establishments Act & Anr ...Respondents ..... None for Petitioners Mr. V.B. Konde Deshmukh, A.P.P. for State ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A. M. KHANWILKAR, J. A. M. KHANWILKAR, J. A. M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED: 12TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 12TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 12TH DECEMBER, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. None for the Petitioners. As the efficacious alternate remedy was available, the Petitioner ought to have taken recourse to that remedy in filing revision before the Sessions Court in view of the recent decision of this Court in the case of V.K. V.K. V.K. Jain & Ors. Vs. Pratap V. Padode reported in Jain & Ors. Vs. Pratap V. Padode reported in Jain & Ors. Vs. Pratap V. Padode reported in 2005(3) Mh. L.J. 778, 2005(3) Mh. L.J. 778, 2005(3) Mh. L.J. 778, no interference is warranted. Dismissed for non prosecution. *****