Petitioner Versus Respondents 1 . HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR QILC.C. No. 221 of 2007 Dr. Raj Kumar Rajmani SIO Shri Pyare Lal Rajmani, Aged About 55 Years, Occupation - Govt. Service, Preseniw Posted As Joint Director In Directorate 0f Heaith Service, .Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (cm State’of Madhya Pradesh through the Principe! Secretary Public Health and Family Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Bhopal The Director, health Services, Madhya Pradeeh, Bhopal Dr. Muni Raj Pandey S/o Shri Anandilal Pandey, aged about 62 years. retired Officer-on-Special Duty, Health Directorate, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Health Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur \ (APPLiCATlON FDR RESTORATION OF THE WRIT PETITION) Sinqle Bench: Hon'ble Justice Shri Satish K. Aqnihotri Present : Shri Rahul Birthary, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.4 ORDER (Passed on 30m July, 2007) {1) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the counsel for the petitioner could not appear on account of bonafide mistake, therefore, WP. No. 3634 of 2005, which was dismissed on 18.06.2007, be restored to its me. \G; (2) Reasonable .and sufficient cause has been shown. WP‘ No. 3634 of 2005 be restored to the original me, subject to payment of cost of Rs.500/- by the petitioner, to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. (3) A copy of this order be placed on record of W. P. No. 3634 of \\ \\ 2005 and the same be iisted for hearing. Sd/~ ,3 ‘Satish K.Agn1'hotri Judge Karma . 6‘“ —.«\_7.. .. . V ”an