CRLMP1878/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Cr. Misc. Petition No.1878/2010 Prashant Kumar Saini Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 25.10.2010 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Sudhir Jain, Counsel for petitioner Shri Piyush Kumar, Public Prosecutor Shri Nem Singh, IO, C.I., Police Station, Sodala, present in person #### By the Court:- Petitioner has approached this Court with grievance that despite police filed final report in the matter and rejection of complainant's application by trial court for further investigation on certain points, Investigating Officer is summoning accused- petitioner to appear before him. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that accused-petitioner was summoned because complainant made a representation to Inspector General of Police concerned and he wanted certain clarifications in that regard. Investigating Officer would now abide by order of court concerned on final report submitted by him and would make further investigation only CRLMP1878/2010 // 2 // when ordered by the court and till then he would not summon accused-petitioner. In the light of statement made by Investigating Officer, I do not see any reason to keep this petition pending any further. It is accordingly disposed of as having become infructuous. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//