IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8839 of 2009 RAJU CHAUDHARY @ RAJU KUMAR, S/o late Ramanand Chaudhary Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 13.04.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though there is recovery of 5 drums of spirit meant for manufacturing wine but petitioner’s name appeared basing discloser made by the villagers and remaining of five Raju Kumar in the petitioner’s villager. In course of investigation, if any of the Raju is found having no concern with the seized spirit found in side of the road, near another village that can be taken into consideration only by the Trial Court after scrutinizing evidence recorded in the case diary. In my view, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the application is rejected. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)