IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 11505 of 2001 Between: M/s Rajahmundry Communication Net Work Pvt. Limited, (Siti Cable) Rep. by its Managing Director, V.S.Kishore, S/o. Surya Suamala Rao, R/o. Jampeta, Ganesh Chowk, Rajahmundry. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Rajahmundry. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in enhancing the rate of per poll per year from Rs.50/- to Rs.210/- through notification No.12829/2000-G1 dt. 27.11.2000 is illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.L.RAJU Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: Mr. Sambasiva Pratap The Court made the following : ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the Writ Petition has become infructuous. His submission is placed on record and the Writ Petition is dismissed has having become infructuous. No order as to costs. ______________________ N. V. RAMANA, J DATED: 01.07.2005 ka To 1 Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, Municipal Administration, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Rajahmundry. 3. Two CCs to G.P. for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 4. Two CD copies.