1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.186 OF 2009 Mrs. Devyani Narhari ....Applicant Versus Mr.Vijay S. Naik & Anr. ....Respondents. Mr. Vijay Patil i/b. Ms.Veera Shinde for the Applicant Mr. P. S. Dani i/b. Ms. Preeti Gada for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 23rd APRIL, 2009. P.C. Heard, Mr. Patil and Mr.Dani, learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. Mr. Patil, learned Counsel for the Applicant, after taking instruction from Applicant who is present in the Court, seeks leave to withdraw the Application. Leave as prayed for, is granted. The Civil Revision Application is disposed of, as withdrawn. 3. Mr. Patil, learned Counsel for the Applicant, submits that the Applicant is staying in the suit premises since the year-1993. It is further submitted that the relationship between the Applicant and her husband is strained as much as suit for divorce is filed by the Applicant's husband. In these circumstances, Mr. Patil, learned Counsel for the Applicant, prays for 2 a longer time to vacate the suit premises. Mr. Dani, learned Counsel for the Respondents, after taking instructions from his clients, in the above peculiar facts, submits that he has no objection if the Applicant is given time till the end of 31st December, 2011 to vacate the suit premises. In view of the concession given by Mr.Dani, learned Counsel for the Respondents, the Applicant is given time to vacate the suit premises till 31st December, 2011 subject to filing usual undertaking in this Court, within the period of four weeks from today. (R. V. MORE, J.)