1 35.caw1115.11 ast IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1115 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8453 OF 2005 Pravinchandra Ratilal Sheth (since deceased) through Lrs. Vinodchandra Ratilal Sheth & ors. ....Applicants. Vs. Smt. Mrudula Damani & ors. ....Respondents Mr. Bhalekar i/b. Ms. Ranjana Parikh, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. P.S. Thorat, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM:- GIRISH GODBOLE, J DATED:- SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 P.C. 1. The Writ Petition is already admitted. R.A.E.Suit is filed by the Landlord which Suit is decreed by the Trial Court but decree is reversed in Appeal. In view of the large number of pending Writ Petitions of earlier years, no priority can be granted to this Writ Petition. Hence prayer clause (a) is rejected. 2. In so far as prayer clauses (b) and (c) are concerned, Advocate for 2 35.caw1115.11 the Respondents states that without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, the amount towards arrears of rent will be paid over to the Petitioners. Advocate for the Petitioners also makes a similar statement that without prejudice to the rights and contentions, such payment will be accepted. Hence no further orders are required to be passed. Civil Application is disposed off. (GIRISH GODBOLE, J)