IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD AUGUST 2011 / 12TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 21147 of 2011(P) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. JITHIN C.P., AGED 21 YEARS, S/O. PRASAD, RAGHAVA NIVAS, KURUPPAMKULANGARA P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. MIDHUN SEKHAR, AGED 21 YEARS, S/O. SHEKARAN, NALUPURAKKAL HOUSE, ANNAKKARA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.S.DILEEP (KALLAR) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686 001. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, ATHIRAMPUZHA, KOTTAYAM-686 001. 3. THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE, PAINAVU, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 602. BY SRI.T.A.SHAJI - SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 21147 of 2011(P) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION DTD.28.7.2011 EXT.P1(A): COPY OF THE PAY-IN-SLIP NO.297709 DTD.28.7.2011 EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REVALUATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DTD.28.7.2011 EXT.P2(A) : COPY OF THE PAY-IN-SLIP BEARING NO.297703 DTD.28.7.2011 EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE EXTRACT OF THE GATA 2011 RESULT OF THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P4 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.28.7.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATATION DTD.28.7.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J --------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.21147 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2011. J U D G M E N T Petitioners completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the result of the 8th Semester examination was declared, they had failed in one paper. They applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioners within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the applications for revaluation have been received and are otherwise in order. 4. Petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ab