!i|!!ll|3«s ^ft^V JA CJ^ s> IN THE HIGii GOURT_ OF CHHATTISGAKH AT BILASPUK. (C.G.) Wrife petit.i.on No. 3&5'0 /2004. PETITIGNER ...^ .-^^ <?•• ^^g^ .^yw--.\ •• '.-'•"'.. .^'••/(A-'"' ;>'--^vy ^°\^"')<•'" ^- ^-~ ^s^""' 6a" RESPONOENTS A® ^•^ /e^\ ^ '\-^: Rakesh Jha S/o Shri O.M.Jha, aged 21 years, oecupation-Studeht, R/o Block Colony, Nayapara, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar (C.G.). V e r s y s 1. State of Giahattlsgarh Throughs The Seeretary, Department of Higher Education, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Direetor of Medical Edueation, Government of Ghhattisgarh, Raipur 3. Board of seeondary ESueation, State o£ Chhattisgarh, Raipur (G.G.) 4. Ghhattisgarh Institute of Hedical Seienees (C.I.M.S.).Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Guru Gbasidas vistsaa. Vidyalaya, Through s The Registrar.Bilaspur (CG; 6. Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Medieal Oollege. Raipur (C.G.). WRIT pETXTION UNDSS. A&TICLE 226/227_OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IND1A FOR ISSOAN'CE OP APpBQpRIATE WRIT QR 1>'RITS AND DIREeTXOttS 8 1. pARTICUL^tS OF THE PETITIQNER ;- As stated above in caiise •feitle. ....contd.••• T 3iT^3?r ^t (^•ri<t> Wil 41l4<l iBli* ^f^ .^.-v* ij ^sf r<ii<4iw<<, ®Til'M'i6,f°«ni'yy,< . W>f.//o-305-0/ tlTOCff aiHICD sn^i T5W (^fy^r) ^•NIW ttfca 3n^T Shri Subash Yadav, couns] Shri Vinod Shrivastava, G.| Heard. By this petition, the petit| examination commonly known a^ was declared, he secured a ranM petitioner, he had also appeared i 2003 and in that examination he petitioner submits that valuation v^ made. He further submits that thel sheets of physics and chemistry i! respondent No.3 (Annexure P-6) Learned counsel for the petitioner demonstrate this. the mark she certificates examinations are I have heard counsel for th From the perusai of the applied for revaluation in the yea< resutt of examination for the year ground that the petitioner nothing material has been fiied to am of the view that there is no su for dismissal and accordingly it is In view ofthis order. I.A. ann^<ed p^tition, perforrfied N4) ^FlfcTOt1! t|I»Rffif 'fe^ <pitt<l< ^sTfiman^i for the petitioner. f^. for the State/respondents. |oner who appeared in pre-medical entrance PMT for the year 2004 and vi'hen the resu!t of 229 in the merit list whereas according to |i the PMT examination conducted for the year ^ecured a rank of 210 and on this ground the (as not properly done and therefore a prayer is Ipetitioner applied for revaluation ofthe answer (1 the year 2003 also. He was informed by the |that after revaluation no change in the result. Isubmits that he is a meritorious student and to jets of High Schooi and Higher Secondary as Annexure P-7 and P-8. i^ parties. i, it appears that though the petitioner had 2003 he did not apply for the same after the p004 was declared. Even otherwise except the weil in the previous examination of PMT Ipersuade this Court to interfere. Accordingly, 1 [sstance in the petition and the petition is !iable dismissed. b. 6535/2004 stands disposed of. ,.---'" -"Sr' GRPRJ—FS/%—J-7200(.—50,000.