IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.35033 -M of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : MAY 03, 2010 COLORS CHANNEL ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS ARVIND THAKUR & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. JS Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Arvind Kashyap, Advocate, for respondents. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) This petition under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed for quashing of Criminal Complaint No.8569 dated 10.10.2008 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 298/120-B, Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chandigarh, and subsequent proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that co-accused of the petitioner had approached this Court by way of filing CRM 14887-M of 2009 (Harbhajan Singh alias Bhajji v. Sh. Arvind Thakur and another) for quashing of the complaint (Annexure P-1). The said petition has been allowed vide order dated 1.9.2009. The order has been upheld by the Criminal Misc. No.35033 -M of 2009 2 Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Only the portion wherein the costs have been awarded, has been set aside. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute this factual position. In view of the above, the petition is allowed in the same terms as in decision dated 1.9.2009 passed in CRM 14887-M of 2009 (Harbhajan Singh alias Bhajji v. Sh. Arvind Thakur and another). There shall, however, be no order as to costs. May 03, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?