IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH JANUARY 2009 / 24TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 37377 of 2008(Y) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- SHAJITHA.K.A. W/O.ISMAIL P.K.,KALLINGAPPARAMBIL HOUSE VADAKKETHARA, PAZHAYANNUR PANCHAYATH, TALAPILLI TALUK, THRISSUR DT. BY ADV. SRI.T.S.RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI SRI.O.K.MURALEEDHARAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT TRIVANDRUM. 2. COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, CO,MMISSIONERATE OF CIVIL SUPPLIES THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR 4. DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, THRISSUR. 5. TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER, THALAPPILLI 6. V.IBRAHIMKUTTY, KUNDAMKULAM HOUSE KALLEPPADOM PO., PAZHAYANNUR, THALAPPILLI TALUK. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/01/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ============== W.P.(C) NO. 37377 OF 2008 (Y) ==================== Dated this the 14th day of January, 2009 J U D G M E N T By Ext.P3, the petitioner was appointed as an Authorised Ration Dealer at Thalappilli Taluk in Trichur District. An appeal filed against Ext.P3 was allowed and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration. Aggrieved by Ext.P4, petitioner carried the matter in appeal before the Commissioner of Civil Supplies and that was rejected by Ext.P6. A revision filed before the Government also met with rejection as per Ext.P7. A reading of the aforesaid orders would show that all the authorities have concurrently found against the petitioner and the petitioner has not produced any material in this writ petition to conclude that the factual findings arrived at concurrently are perverse for any reason. If that be so, this Court will not be justified in interfering with the proceedings. 2. Apart from this, fact remains that Ext.P4, the first appellate order, is a remand order and therefore the 4th respondent is to reconsider the matter, wherein the petitioner will have the opportunity to urge all his contentions. The 4th respondent is directed to reconsider the matter and pass orders thereon, at any rate within 6 weeks of receipt of a copy of this WPC 37377/08 :2 : judgment. 3. It is directed that in the meanwhile and until orders are passed as above, status quo as it prevails today, will be maintained. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp