CHHATT.'SGARH st; /2006 igig Benel! Kumar i oppo, Aged about J4 years, S/'o. Jems TO.DDO, R/o. villaae & Post bingiDanar, lan. KunKuri; Uistt. Jasnpur(C-G) ,A^ r^y. ^'..-•^'A^.-'' y^y .••""' .'S^V .•?•'' ^yy sy -**' ^* 11 ^ ?'/2] 3] yERSUS btate of Lnnattisgarn, Throush: Secretary, Tribal Welfare ueptt., U.K.b. Bnawan, Raipur (CG) Coiiector, Dantewaaa, Djstt UaKsmn Bastar, Dantewada (CG) uirector, panchayat and Gramin VlKas vibhag, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, DistriGt Kaipur (CLi) Lniet lixecutive OTricer, Janpad Kancnayat, Bnalramgarn, uistnct Uantewada (CU) Biock Education Officer, Janpad Hancnayat, Bnairamgarn, Uistnct Dantewada fCG') Chief Executive Officer, ziia Kancnayat, Uantewada, Uistnct Dantewada (CG) WR!T PET!T!ON UNDER AP.TSCLE 226/227 OF THE 41 5] 61 ^-a. ^'•rf'kh.le'-T't-T'I t°p3i/^.M f^f ifc.tpM * S-'T3 HIGH COURT OP JUDIC^TUHE CHHAmSGARH: BILASPUR Sln^le Bench: Hon'ble Sluri Satlsh K. Agnlhotri, J. W. P. No. 1221 OF 2006 Petitioner : Kapil Kuniar Toppo Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh & Ofhers. Shri Manoj Paranjpe, counsel for fhe petitioiier. Shri Sunil Olwani, panel laroyer for the respondents. ORAL ORDBR (25th March, 2006) 1. This petition chatleiiges the unpugned order dated 30.11.2005, (Aimexure P-8), passed by the respondent No.S, whereby the Officer Incharge of Prim.ary School Pindulspal, Block Bhairamgarh, Dtetrict Daatewada, has been directed tfaat the oider dated 30.10.2005, (Annexure P-5), passed by the Janpad Panchayat, Bhairamgarh, appointmg Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III, be not given effect to without permlssion ofDistrict CoUector, Dantewada. 2. Leamed counsel for the petitioner subtiiits that the petitioner was duly selected aad appointed as Shiksha Kanni Grade-III, vide order dated 20.10.2005 (Annexure P- 5), passed by the respondent No.6. 3. The petitioner was inform.ed that the entire selection process appoiating Shiksha Kanni Grade-III, has been can.ceBed. It is furfher contended fhat fhe petitioner has not received any written uifonnation as yet about canceUation of the selection proceedings, or his appointnient. 4. Leamed counsel appeariaig for fhe respondents No.l, 2 aad 3, subinits that the petitioner has never joiued pursuant to ^-•-,,r^^^aB^^i^S^B^'^sai^^s^^""- '^ his selection and appoiatment as Shiksha Kanni, Grade-III. It was further submitted that since tfae entire selection proceeduigs have been quashed and new selection process has been initiated, the petitioner does not have any right to the appointinent. 5. Be that as it inay, leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has m&de a representation, (Aanexure P- 10) to the Secretaiy Scheduled Caste, Schediiled Tri.be aad Backward Classes, Welfare Departaient, Goverrunent of Chhattisgarh, therefore, the respondeats raay be directed to decide the said representation wifhin a stipulated peiiod. 6. Haviag heard leam.ed counsel for the parties, in fhe facts aad circumstances of the case, the respondents are directed to consider aad decide fhe representation (Annexure P-10), in accordance with law, within a period ofthree weeks, irom the date ofreceipt/production ofcopy offhis order. 7. In view of foregoing, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Sal Sol- . ^ ,AK^°I m 5ud&e c^»','-n