IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-34527 of 2009 Date of decision: 24.12.2009 Vinay and another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Neena Madan, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Asish Gupta, Advocate for the complainant. S. D. ANAND, J. The only non-bailable offence, with which petitioners stand charged is an offence under Section 307 IPC. It is otherwise common ground that no grievous injury was found on the person of the injured by the Medical Officer. The plea raised on behalf of the State is that the manner in which the impugned occurrence had taken place is indicative of the intention of the petitioners ( and their non-petitioners associates). In an act of resistance, it is pointed out on behalf of the petitioners that though one of them is alleged to have been armed with a sword and other with a Danda, no grievous injury, at all, is alleged to have been caused to the injured. Without expressing any opinion on merits, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. December 24, 2009 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE