3x? @ $iNmE WNW) a IN THE I-HGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR g m . ) WHrPETHION s No. 39% 0F2006 l’anchayt Pithora, Disti- yW Coiiector Mahasamumi , Disti— Mahmmmé g C. G; WIPEEHwN Hm 22m; $5 E%swsgm§F ’ gAmé‘ I’EHTIONBR : NEHRUL MAHESHWARI, Sfo Shri 6. R. Makeswari, Age about XOL;......",,....m 46 Years, Occupation— Service swugyyrlx’aé rm. y‘h%" ?ogted as ChiefExecutive officer Janpad Panchayai Pithora, Dism— Mahasamum; (6.6.) VERSUS RESP§NDENT$ : State 0f Chhattisgayh through, the Secretary Department of Panefxayat ami Rurai Development Department D.‘K. S. EuiicEing Raigmr, D§stt . Raipur (6.6.) femgf Magiepak aeimr impaci‘ f r HIQH CQURT QF QHHA?T!$§ARH AT 3H$§PUR SINGLE EENCH : HGN‘BLE MR SATISH K. AGMHOTRL J. instruct'ion, submits that ihe peiitianer wants to withdraw this ,setitien. to wmch ieameci counsei appearing for the reSpondentslState has n0 ob}ectian. 2. The petixion is acccrdingiy dismissed as wi’thdrawn. No order as to costs. Sd/- ’ Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gopal WRIT PETmGN {5.) NG.3944 CF 29% Pemioner Nehru! Mahe5hwari verws Resoonden’ts : State of Chhaiéisgarh and anothe? Present : Mr Sun1$ahu couns¢! far the AdvaL—cate peWcioner Mr: V.V:.S.Nio;rthy, Dyeputy éenerai wiih Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the respondents}3tate, ORDER (Passed an 175‘“ Day 0f December, 2006} Learned counsei appeaking for the getitioner, on