1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (O) NO. 403 OF 2011 AND M.C.A. STAMP NO.22211 OF 2010. IN WRIT PETITION NO. 680 OF 2010. Narendra Sonbaji Khawale. . Vrs. District Selection Committee, thr. its Chairman, the Collector, Nagpur and others. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. (Shri. P. N. Shende, Advocate for appellant.) CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 15th July, 2011. The prayer is to condone the delay of about 83 days in filing Misc. Civil Application for review. Reason given is the order of which review is sought was questioned in Letters Patent Appeal and the Letters Patent Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate application before this Court. After that order dated 14th. December, 2010 present application has been filed on 20th December, 2 2010. Shri. Jibhkate, learned Counsel for respondent No.3 and Shri Kankale, learned Addl. Government Pleader for respondent No.2/Municipal Council as also learned Government Pleader for respondent No.4 are opposing the prayer of condonation of delay. However, in the interest of justice, the delay is condoned. The Civil Application (O) No 403 of 2011 is accordingly disposed of. M.C.A. Stamp No. 22211 of 2010. M.C.A. Stamp No. 22211 of 2010 is heard with consent. It is apparent that before this Court on 30th August, 2010 effort was to demonstrate entitlement to relaxation. Now effort is to show that there is no upper age limit fixed. The respective counsel for respondents point out that the Municipal Council is employer of applicant and hence the age limit is regulated by the relevant Maharashtra Civil Services Rules, in this respect. According to Shri Shende, Learned Counsel 3 for applicant, the provisions of Secondary School Code are applicable and in Secondary School Code there is no age limit mentioned. There is no explanation why this ground was not taken when Writ Petition was disposed of. Even otherwise, applicant is seeking employment which receives grant in aid from State and is public employment. Hence on merit the arguments of learned Counsel for appellant is misconceived, Misc. Civil Application Stamp No 22211 of 2010 is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE Deshmukh.