^ •T /-' ^.y»:-"y PtBSt daw*-""" ^- ^,^ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT MLASPUR ^9. W.P.No. 4-631 Of2006. •j^- PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ,./' /" ^^ ,fl9' '' ..^ ^^' ••^- g^' c^" Vipin Bihari Agrawal, son ofiSL; R<M &lw|^ -^ ._-.-. J Aged aboutS^3 years, resident ofVillage Datan, Tahsil Palari, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh). V E R S U S :- ^A. StateofChhattisgarh, Throughthe Secretaiy, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), 2. Collector, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), ,3. Chief Executive OfBcer, Janpad Panchayat, Palari, District Raipur (C.G.), 4. Tahsildar, Palari, Tahsil Palari, District Raipiir (Chhattisgarh), ,5. Raclheshyam Sahu, Sarpanch, Village Panchayat Datan, Tahsil Palari, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), ^ PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA DETAILS OF^E3 XI-HC-22 sn^rqiT I^TRisn^r Stitll* N><ri5cT )nt 3^ '^l<lld<l, WTfl'M'IS, Rldl'M^ _.w^CO^^S' /°fc NltfCTI !t)*1|Ch •••••••••••••..•..... g.^ ^gO f^%"""""""": an^TS^ciTWHfid' (M.09.2006 Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sr.Advc the petitioner. Shri N.K. Agaiwal, Dy. A.G| Heard on admission. At the verv outset. learn< submits that some mistakes havei which. an apolteation for amendnjient his main submission is that though Rs.40,000/- on 27/11/2005 for mah area of the Gram Panchavat bearilng not begun so far. He also submi) Gram Panchavat had made comi 9/5/2006 for Droceedina aaainst taken in this regard. Shri Agrawlal made bv the Detitioner was not at Petition. In the ooinion ofthis Courtl This petition is summarilv (ji Shri N.K. Agrawal, Dy. A.G| copv submite that since the ^l Sarpanch, he would take necess^ and to remind about taking necessarv under the law. The copy of this order sha| ?;rafa'ift:r wrat'ff fei^rftep ^arf^iTgn^T lcate with Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Counsel for for the State on advance CODV. fed counsel for the Detitioner verv franklv ibeen committed in draftina the petition. for has alreadv been moved. On merits, respondent No.5 had withdrawn a sum of Wna construction of C.C. road in sanctuned Khasra No.748, but the construction has (s that the oetitioner. who is a citizen of the ^lairrt to the prescribed authority, Raipur on Irespondent No.5, but no action has been further submits that when the complaint tended. he was constrained to file this Writ ke. ^- issuance of writ would not^roper. ismissed. for the State. who is appearing on advance lleqations have been made aqainst the irv steps to apprise the concerned authority aclpropriate steps in the matter, if required be supplied to the State free of cost. Sd/- _. SunaKumarSinba judge (,'ns^f^) '^•-