¥ ^® v^ fogl& Bench IN THE mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CTVTL REVTSION N0 }o] /2006. APPLICANTS SFENDANTS ^ <JUDGEMENT DEBTORS NON-APPLTCANTS TIPF DECREE HOLDER ^^ ^.c- ^* <A^t^ 2L Smt. Kanchan Bai; W/0. Budhram Ukey aged about 59 years, House wife, Budhram Ukey; S/0. Mahadeo Ukey, aged about 66 years, retired police constablc Both Caste Mahar, B o th ar e R/ o. N ehru Nagar; Tahsil Bhanupratappur, Distt. North Bastar Kanker, (C.G.) VERSUS 1) ^ 2> Sfnt-, Satyavati, W/o- Ramkaran Meshram aged about 34 years; Caste Mahar^ R/o. Nehru Nagar, Tahsil, Bhanupratappur, District North Bastaf Kanker, (C. G.) State of Chhatttsgarh; Through: Collector, North Bastar Kanker (C. G.) CIVIL REVISIONU/S 1150FC. P. C. XI-HC-78 ^n^r^T^ich cPTT3TT^?T$b^ich 1^^ +11+1C11 ?h+lich T^r^i^icrt^, ^Tfl^1!^, f®i<ni^^< . C i^.too- fo^ ^ 2QOS. 3TT^T M^ch (^t^^T) ^TT^R ^cf 3TI^T 21.7.2006 Shri Raiaesh Shanna, Heard on admission. Order passed as foUo^s IORAL ORDBR exbcution Cdde handted This revision is dircct^d passed ia execution case Class-I, Bhanupratappur, D| A perusal of fhe ord|e] executioa case rcgarding 08.7.2005, an objection wa^ M.P. (C.G) Laad Revenue decree relates to deUvexy possession has to be executing court^m view of aforesaid Code^cannot pass The argumeats petitioner appears to be nii^< Reveuue Code provides that| Code, or ia any ofher court shaU entertaia any obtaui a decision or ordei Goverament, fhe Board or empowered to detename, chl^?cn<'TlT1 HPToff ^f te^ <f^1<:<.l< ^3Tf^TT3n^T counsel for the petitioners. agaiast fhe order dated 21.6.2006 |No.l2-A/2004 by the Civil Judge, |.stt, Kaaker (Bastar). j|er would show that m a pendiag ofjudgaieat & decrce dated taken u/s 248, 250 and 257 of fhe inter-alia pleadmg that since fhe [of possessioa and ultimately the over to the decrce holder, fhe flie provisions of section 257 of fhe ^ny Qrder in this rcgard. by leamed counsel for fhe iconceived. Sectiou 257 of fhe Laad except as ofherwise provided ia fhis for fhe beiag iri force, no civil 4it instituted or appUcation made to on any matter which fhe State ^ny Revenue Officer is by this Code or dispose of, aad ia advalnced enactknent siUt dejcide XI-HC-78 3TI^T^r^i<=b cT§TT3TT^T9h^l<=b 1»»IN».' t^ *1I«4<<1I Sh+lich s^T^ii^icn^, ^ifl^^Ko, ^«ni^^< » C-^. ^o. \o\ ^ 200 ^ 3TT^T ^5<ch (^c(i^q^€T) ^<TT^K ^rfN'^n^r -t secltion attractted and wifhout prcjudice to fh|c court shaU exercise aay j^irisdictic rcferred fhereunder. A bare readiag of these provisions are obtaiiied or order is to be referred thereia, but wherc aiid the court is havuijg provisions would not be The revision has no m|c Consequenfly, M.C.P.| I.A. No. 2211/2006 for urge^it hearing generaUty of the provision, no civil j^irisdiction over any of the matters chl^lld41-l m^TT ^ fWt <-^^1< ^3:rf^R'3TI^T 257 of fhe Code would show fhat where certaia decision is to be 4iade ia regard to fhe subject matter jthe orders have already been passed on^* executory jurisdiction, these atbfected. ;rit and fhe same is dismissed. .^0.1184/2006 for grant of stay aad stand disposed of Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge P.T.O.