( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1494 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1494 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1494 OF 2006 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.794 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.794 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.794 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax-19 .. Appellant Vs. Shri.Rajkumar Pamnani .. Respondent Mr.R.G.Bhat for the Appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ. A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ. A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ. DATE : 10th June, 2008 DATE : 10th June, 2008 DATE : 10th June, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 28 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)