IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12550 of 2009 Between: A. Sarala Devi, W/o. K.V. Siva Kumar Reddy, R/o. Flat No. 302, D-Wing, Phase -IV, Janapriya Apartments, Miyapur, Hyderabad. .... PETITIONER AND 1 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by Commissioner, Tank Bund, Hyderabad. 2 Deputy Commissioner, G.H.M.C., Serilingampally, Hyderabad. 3 R.D.O., Chevella Division, Ranga Reddy District. 4 Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Rep. by its Vice Chairman, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not considering my application for grant of building permission in respect of House Plot bearing No. 40, in survey No. 44/1, admeasuring 240 Sq. Yards or 200.64 Sq. meters situated at Miyapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14 and 300-A and principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to grant building permission to the petitioner and pass such other order or orders as the Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT.D.PRAMADA Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: SMT.KALPANA EKBOTE The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.12550 OF 2009 ORDER : The petitioner herein claims to be the absolute owner of the House Plot bearing No.40, situated in Sy.No.44/1 of Miyapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal. She made an application in the month of December, 2008 before the 2nd respondent for grant of building permission along with the plans and other documents. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in considering the said application, the present writ petition is filed. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has brought to my notice that in identical circumstances this Court disposed of W.P.No.12861 of 2007 relating to a plot situated in Sy.No.44/1 of Miyapur Village with a direction to the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner therein for granting building permission. Similar orders were passed by this Court in favour of other plot owners in Sy.No.44/1 of Miyapur in W.P.No.23208 of 2008, W.P.No.6230 of 2009 and etc. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Corporation has not disputed the fact that the petitioner herein is also similarly situated. In the circumstances, following the above said orders, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the request of the petitioner for grant of building permission in respect of House Plot bearing No.40 in Sy.No.44/1 admeasuring 240 sq. yards situated at Miyapur village, Serilingampally Mandal, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and pass appropriate orders following due process of law, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. _______________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 26.06.2009 RAR/gbs Note:- CC in 3 days. (B/O) RAR THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 12550 of 2009 DATED : 26-06-2009