IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4771 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 24.08.2009 Smt.Bhagwanti Gulati and others .....Petitioners versus Ravi Sethi, Proprietor of Kshitiz Infotech. .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.R.S.Manhas, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-landlords are aggrieved at the orders dated 25.5.2009 and 15.6.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Panchkula, whereby firstly the rent of the demised premises has been assessed @ Rs.4000/- per month w.e.f. 1.4.2008 as against the claim of the petitioners that the monthly rent is Rs.12000/- per month, and secondly, the time to tender the same has been further extended. Having regard to the fact that the rent has been assessed by the Rent Controller provisionally, I am not inclined to interference in the impugned orders at this stage. At the same time, the Rent Controller shall ensure that the petitioner's' claim regarding the rate of rent is found to be C.R. No.4771 of 2009 (O&M) 2 be correct, they are able to recover the arrears thereof from the respondent- tenant without prejudice to the other legal consequences like eviction order etc. The revision petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to move an application before the Rent Controller to direct the tenant to furnish adequate security to the satisfaction of the Rent Controller upon which appropriate order will be passed by the Rent Controller within a period of one month. Dasti. 24-08-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE