IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 747 of 2001 (S/B) Old No. 15725 of 1981 Braj Kishore Singh ………… Petitioner Versus Union of India and others …………….. Respondents Mr. L.P. Naithani, Sr. Advocate/S.C. Bhatt, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Prakash Bisht, learned Standing Counsel for Union of India. Hon. P. C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Mr. L.P. Naithani, learned senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Prakash Bisht, learned Standing Counsel for Union of India. The learned counsel for the petitioner confines his grievance only to the dispose of the representation made by him in the light of Clause ‘g’ of Section 2 of the Central Reserve Police Act, 1949. Accordingly to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner was serving as ‘Zamadar’. He is entitled to be classified and re-designated as ‘Sub Inspector’ and paid salary of Sub Inspector. To this effect the petitioner has submitted a representation to the respondents which is pending un disposed of. Without touching the merit of the case, we direct the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this Order in the light of the observation made above. The petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) (P. C. Verma,A.C. J.) Dt. 20.05.2004 HN