IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 3722 OF 2009 Smt. Gulab Govind Sangle ..PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Mah. & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Mr A.N. Kakade, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr V.H. Dighe, AGP for respondent no.1; Mr U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondents no.2 & 3; Mr V.C. Patil (Ashtekar), Advocate for respondent no.4. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE : 11th September, 2009 PER COURT : Shri A.N. kakade, learned Counsel for the petitioner states that in the light of the averments made at paragraph 5 of the affidavit in reply filed by Dr. M.R. Karad, Administrative Officer, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, which reads thus :- "It is submitted that now the period of break in service has been condoned of the present petitioner and her proposal for the break period to be considered as per the leaves permissible under law. She will be eligible for the training course, which is required for promotion, and she will be considered and sent for training course. As such the grievance of the petitioner for sending her to training course will be solved by sending her to the training course. I, therefore, say that the petition, being without any substance, deserves to be dismissed." , the petitioner does not wish to prosecute this petition further. Shri Kakade, learned Counsel for the petitioner, therefore, states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty of submitting a representation to the respondents, after the petitioner has been sent for promotional training, for declaring the petitioner as a senior most employee and to grant promotion to the petitioner to the post of Lady Health Visitor from NT (D) category. 2. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty with a further direction to the respondents to decide the said representation in accordance with law, if submitted by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. ( A.V.POTDAR, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) amj/wp3722.09