IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 688 of 2010. Sewa Ram S/O Ram Lal, R/O Village Prem Rajpur, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. … Petitioner. Vs. 1. State of Uttarakhand, through Collector, Haridwar. 2. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar. 3. Tehsildar, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. 4. Punjab National Bank, Bhagtowali, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar, through its Branch Manager. …Respondents. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.P.Upadhyay, Addl. C.S.C., learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Lalit Tiwari, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent no.4-Bank. Date May 11, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the recovery citation dated 10- 3-2010 issued by respondent no.3 Annexure-3 to the writ petition. According to the petitioner, he took a loan for purchase of tractor, which was entered in his account No. 59872 and Account No. K.C.C. 1876 respectively vide Annexure-1. The petitioner has deposited some of the instalments with the Bank and copies of instalment receipts have been annexed as Annexure-2 to the writ petition. Due to financial difficulties, the petitioner could not regularly repay the loan instalment, which gave rise to issuance of recovery citation (Annexure-3 to the petition) against the petitioner. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the entire outstanding amount under the recovery citation in easy quarterly 2 instalments. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent no.4-Bank, Mr. Lalit Tiwari, Advocate, has submitted that the respondent-Bank would have no objection if the entire outstanding amount against the petitioner along with recovery charges is deposited by the petitioner in not more than four equal quarterly instalments. In the above facts and circumstances, the petitioner is directed to pay the entire outstanding amount under the impugned recovery citation (Annexure-3 to the petition) in four equal quarterly instalments before the Recovery Officer along with recovery charges. The first quarterly instalment shall be payable by the 15th day of July 2010 and the subsequent instalments shall fall due by the 15tht day of the month after every three months thereafter. It is made clear that in case the petitioner fails to deposit any of the quarterly instalments, as directed above, the respondents would be at liberty to recover the entire outstanding amount along with recovery charges from the petitioner in lump-sum. Accordingly, the impugned recovery citation (Annexure-3) shall not be given effect to by the respondents. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. All pending applications stand disposed of. (B.S.Verma,J.) RCP 3