1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION W.P. NO. 3628 OF 2009 Dattatraya Mahadev Patil and Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. The Collector and Deputy Director for Rehabilitation Kolhapur and Ors. ..Respondents .... Mr. P.D.Dalvi Adv. for Petitioners Mr. V.S.masurkar AGP for State. .... CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : JULY 3, 2009 P.C.: 1. The grievance of the petitioners is that their land was acquired for the project and they were project affected persons. They moved application in 2002 for declaration that they were project affected persons. 2. Counter affidavit has been filed in which it is not disputed that the land of the petitioners was acquired for a project, but it is stated that the application of the petitioners is not traceable in the office. In paragraph 6 of the counter affidavit, it is stated that if the petitioners apply afresh, their applications will be considered in accordance with the Rules. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to move an application before the concerned authorities within a period of four 2 weeks from today. If such an application is made, it will be decided in six months from the date of its presentation. 3. Writ petition is disposed of. [ BILAL NAZKI,J. ] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]