IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-16771 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: June 03, 2010 Satnam Singh alias Shama .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.R.P. Dhir, Advocate for the petitioner .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) This is a petition for pre-arrest bail in a case pending before the Sessions Court at Kapurthala under Sections 307/326/324/325/341/506/148/149 IPC pursuant to FIR No.69 dated 10.7.2004, Police Station Bhulath, District Kapurthala. Mr. Dhir, learned counsel for the petitioner, contends that bail bonds of the petitioner have been cancelled due to non-appearance on one date i.e. 19.4.2010. Learned counsel submits that non-appearance of petitioner before the trial court was totally unintentional. He has also referred to certificate-Annexure P/3 to contend that petitioner was suffering from 'enteric fever' at the relevant time. Notice of motion. On the asking of the court, Mr. K.S. Pannu, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice. He submits that in case petitioner Crl.Misc.No.M-16771 of 2010 - - is to be granted bail, it should be subject to stringent conditions. In view of above, it is directed that in case petitioner surrenders before the trial Court within a week of receipt of certified copy of the order, he shall be admitted to bail subject to his furnishing an undertaking that he shall not default in appearance before the trial court on any date in future and/or any other condition deemed fit by the trial court. Allowed in the aforesaid terms. June 03, 2010 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE 2