1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) Nos.16193, 16194 & 16196 of 2011 AANAD @ RAJKUMAR .. PETITONER/ACCUSED IN ALL THE PETITIONS Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE K. PARAMATHI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT, CR NO. 217/2010 .. RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT IN CRL.OP(MD)No.16193/2011 STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THENNILAI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT. .. RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT IN CR.NO.171 & 172/2010 in CRL.OP(MD)Nos.16194 & 16196/2011 Crl.OP.No.16194 & 16196/2011 respectively For Petitioner : M/S. B.JAMEELARASU Advocate in all the petitions For Respondent : MR. K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor in all the petitions PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is an accused and he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Section 379 IPC in Crime NO.217 of 2010 on the file of K.Paramathi Police Station and in Crime Nos.171 and 172 of 2010 on the file of the Thennilai Police station. 2.Heard Mr.B.Jameelarasu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in these cases. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition likely to be imposed by this Court in the event of granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the allegation as against the petitioner is that he is said to have committed theft of goats. He further submitted that the goats were recovered. 5.Consdiering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the goats were already recovered and the other co-accused were also released on bail, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate NO.II, Karur and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) in each case, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Karur and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the Thennilai Police Station, Karur District, every day at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 21/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KARUR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR 3 THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE , K.PARAMATHI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT 4 THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, THENNILAI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT 5 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +3. CC to M/S. B.JAMEELARASU Advocate SR.Nos.45305 to 45307 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.16193, 16194, 16196 of 2011 Date :21/12/2011 TR : 23.12.2011: 2P/9C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/