AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.684 OF 2006 Shri Madan Namdeo Murtadak ... Petitioner Vs. Nirmala Madan Murtadak & Anr. ... Respondents Ms. P.P. Karnik for the petitioner. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. DATED : 6TH NOVEMBER, 2006. P.C. :- The petitioner is the husband. He is aggrieved by the order dated 18/1/2006 passed by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nasik, awarding maintenance at the rate of Rs.500/- per month to the minor son Tejas and Rs.1000/- per month to respondent 1-wife. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. She submitted that the petitioner is ready to maintain respondent 1 and their son. She submits that respondent 1 is not willing to accept that offer and, hence, she is not entitled to any maintenance. I am not AJN 2 impressed by this submission. The impugned judgment and order is well reasoned. It does not call for any interference. Hence, petition is rejected. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.]