IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 20340 of 2001 Between: 1 Ratan Lal Nahata, S/o. Hukumchand, Lotus Plaza, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. 2 Sri Sampath Kothari, S/o. Late Bhimaraj Kothari, F-5, LIG-B-5, A.P.H.B.Colony, M.J. Road, Hyderabad. 3 Sri Pramod Kumar Dugura, S/o. Hanaraj Durga, R/o. 4-4-88/1, I Floor, Kokkonda Complex, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. 4 Sri Munesh Kumar Nahata, S/o. Jatnal Lal Nahata, R/o. 1-2-300, Domalguda, Hyderabad. 5 Sri Prakash, S/o. Late Malliaja, R/o. Mangahal, Ghat, Hyderabad. 6 Vindo Joshi, S/o. Late Jainarayana Joshi, Nanna Gelli, Easamai Bazar, Hyderabad. 7 Sri Prakash Nahata, S/o. Sumernal Nahata, Flat No.402, Himayathnagar, Street No.9, Hyderabad-29. 8 Sri Hanumanlal Duguar, S/o. Chiranjeevilal, Arihant Bearing Centre, 120,Kabra Complex, M.G. Road, Secunderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, C.C.S. Hyderabad. 3 Sri Basanth Bohra, Resident of 6-3-668/10/77 & 78, Durganagar Colony, Punjagutta, Hyderabad. 4 Sri Lalith Bohra, Resident of 6-3-668/10/77 & 78, Durganagar Colony, Punjagutta, Hyderabad. 5 Mrs. Bharathi Bohra, Resident of 6-3-668/10/77 & 78, Durganagar Colony, Punjagutta, Hyderabad. 6 Lakshmipathi Bohra, Resident of 6-3-668/10/77 & 78, Durganagar Colony, Punjagutta, Hyderabad. 7 Binith Bhora, Resident of 6-3-668/10/77 & 78, Durganagar Colony, Punjagutta, Hyderabad. 8 Arun Bhora, Resident of 6-3-668/10/77 & 78, Durganagar Colony, Punjagutta, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents No.1 & 2 to register a Criminal case against the respondents 3 to 8 and investigate into the matter and further direct the respondents 1 & 2 to seize their properties and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners :Mr.V.V.PRABHAKARA RAO (Not present) Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER: It is an old matter appearing in the supplemental list today. In spite of this, the learned counsel for the petitioners is absent and there is no representation on his behalf. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed for default/non-prosecution. No costs. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 21-06-2005 vs To 1 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner of Police, C.C.S. Hyderabad. 3 Two CCs to G.P.for Home, High Court Buildings, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad(OUT) 4 2 CD copies