IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DECEMBER 2008 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 RP.No. 1262 of 2008() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN MACA.707/2003 OPMV.1647/1992 of MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, THRISSUR .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): APPELLANT/ IST RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- KALYANI, AYINIVALAPPIL HOUSE, K.K.LANE, POST POONKUNNAM AND DESOM, THRISSUR. BY SMT.KALYANI (PARTY IN PERSON) RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS /PETITIONERS / 3RD RESPONDENT: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AIPPURU, S/O THAIKKATTIL, MATHUNNY, THRIRUR AMSOM, KILLANNUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. 2. FRANCIS, S/O KOLLANNUR ANTONY, VENGANISSERY DESOM, VELLUR VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK. 3. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD, BOU BROTHERS BUILDING, GURUVAYOOR ROAD, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. ADV. SRI. P.V.JYOTHIPRASAD FOR R3 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss M.N.KRISHNAN, J ===================== R.P. No.1262 OF 2008 in MACA.No. 707/2003 ===================== Dated this the 10th day of December 2008 O R D E R The party in person present. Heard the party. The appeal was disposed of after hearing the learned counsel, who then appeared for the review petitioner. The said appeal had arisen after a revised order passed by the Tribunal as per the directions of this Court in MFA No.399 of 1998. The only question that was directed to be considered by the Tribunal was regarding the validity of the licence. The Tribunal found against the review petitioner and in appeal, the matter has been re-agitated. I had applied my mind and passed a judgment. I also held that the question of ownership at this distance of time cannot be raised for the reason that the scope of the remand was limited. Therefore I do not find any error apparent on the face of the record to review the judgment and therefore it is dismissed. 2. As a last chance in order to prefer the matter before the Supreme Court, the party wanted some time. I feel the insurance company can be RP 1262/08 in MACA 707/03 -:2:- directed not to initiate any coercive proceedings for a period of two months. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE Cdp/-