BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fifth day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.9232 of 2011 1 S.MANJANAMBI 2 VEILU MUTHU 3 VASANTHA ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KAYATHAR POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. ( CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2011) ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT MUTHULAKSHMI ..INTERVENOR For Petitioner : M/S. R.ANAND Advocate For Respondent :Mr.A.RAMAR,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : Mr.M.VEILKANI RAJU, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 420, 423, 465, 467 and 468 of IPC and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Mr.M.Veilkani , learned counsel for intervenor filed an application to intervene, the anticipatory bail application. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor(Crl.Side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the defacto complainant, petition enquiry was conducted and closed and no case has been registered. 4.Considering the rival submission made on either side, the respondent is directed not to harass the petitioners. The respondent is directed to follow the procedure contemplated under D.K.Basu Vs. Stage of West Bengal reported in AIR(1997) SC 610 under the guise of enquiry. With above observation, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- 05/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ TO 1.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 2.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KAYATHAR POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. R.ANAND Advocate SR.No.26513 rl/4c – 8.8.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9232 of 2011 Date :05/08/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/