IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 341 OF 2007 MISS KAVITA KAMBALE AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. M. P. Amonkar,Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. R. Rivonkar,Govt. Advocate for the respondents. Coram:- R. S. MOHITE & N. A. BRITTO, JJ. Date:- 8th August, 2007 P.C. This petition seeks a declaration that petitioner No.2 who is the father of petitioner No.1 is the dependent as defined under Medical Attendance Rule as applicable to the States of Goa. A direction is sought to allow the petitioner No.1 to claim reimbursement of actual medical expenses of petitioner No.2. We have perused the Medical Attendance Rules and the same reveal that in order to declare a person as dependent, his income should not be more than Rs.1500/-. In the present case, the petitioner No.2 gets pension of Rs.8,232/-. In our view, he does not qualify to be a dependent. This is not a fit case to entertain this petition. Hence, petition is rejected. Writ petition is disposed off as dismissed. R. S. MOHITE, J. N. A. BRITTO, J. SMA