-1- IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION PETITION PETITION NO.255 OF 2008 NO.255 OF 2008 NO.255 OF 2008 Shri Laxman Kshirsagar and anr. ...Petitioners v/s Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation and others ...Respondents Mr A.V. Anturkar i/b Mr S. Deshmukh for Petitioners. Mr D.R. More for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr S.R. Nargolkar, AGP for Respondent No.4. CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND J.P. DEVADHAR JJ. DATE : 21ST JULY 2008. -2- P.C. :- 1. The petitioners are persons who have admittedly constructed their houses and buildings unauthorisedly without getting their building plans sanctioned. They have filed this petition for direction to the Planning Authority and Municipal Corporation to demarcate the road line as per the development plan because they apprehend that the application that they have made for regularisation of their structures may be rejected by the Corporation on the ground that their structures come in the way of the road that is presently existing. Firstly, the petitioners do not deserve any interference in their favour in the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court because admittedly, the petitioners have violated the law by making constructions without getting their building plans sanctioned. Secondly, it is clear from the affidavit filed by the Corporation that the present road that has been constructed is not of the width which is contemplated by the development plan but is of lesser width because the land is not available presently and that the Corporation will construct road of full width after the land becomes available by pulling down unauthorised structures. In our opinion, taking overall -3- view of the matter therefore, the petitioners do not have any case. Their application for regularisation of their structures may be rejected by the Corporation on several grounds including to one which is contemplated by the petitioners. In our opinion, looking at the matter from any point of view, it will not be appropriate to entertain the petition. Petition is rejected. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar / Private Secretary as true copy. . Certified copy expedited. ( D.K. DESHMUKH J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR J.)