MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2670 OF 2007 Deepak Pawar ..Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Jay Dalal i/b. Mr. Akhilesh Singh, for the Petitioner Mr. V.V. Iyer, for respodnent Nos.3,4, 6 and 7. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & A.A.KUMBHAKONI,JJ. A.A.KUMBHAKONI,JJ. A.A.KUMBHAKONI,JJ. DATED: 13th October, 2008 DATED: 13th October, 2008 DATED: 13th October, 2008 . When the matter came up on 3rd October, 2008 we had asked Counsel as to how the petition is maintainable against the respondent No.2 which is a Trust and not a State or Authority within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner was working as a Peon with the respondent No.2. 2. When the matter comes up today learned Counsel seeks adjournment on the ground that Advocate Akhilesh Singh is not available. Last time appearance was put up by Mr. S.C. Prabhu. Hence the application for adjournment rejected. 3. The petition as filed is not maintainable. It will be open to the petitioner to take such remedy in law before the forum where he can pursue his grievance and rejection of this petition on the point of maintainability will not come in the way of the petitioner. With the above observation petition stands disposed of. (A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.) (A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.) (A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)