303crra235.08.sxw . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL REVISION APLICATION NO. 235 OF 2008 Jaisingh Amarsingh Rathod Vs. The State of Maharashtra & another Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Adv. Mrs. MM Deshmukh H/F Shri VR Choudhari, Adv. for the applicant. Shri PD Kothari, APP for the State. Coram : R.C. Chavan, J. Dated : 30th March, 2009 This revision is directed against the appellate judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Darwha, whereby he set aside the conviction of respondent No. 2 for offence punishable under Sections 353 and 332 of the Indian Penal Code recorded by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Digras. The ground on which the learned Additional Sessions Judge set aside the judgment was that the incident had allegedly taken place on 06/02/1998 whereas the report thereof was given on 06/3/1998. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that it was a typographical error. It could not have been a typographical error since the applicant stated even before the learned Magistrate in his deposition i.e. in examination in chief that incident took place on 06/02/1998. It cannot be said that the view taken by the Additional Sessions Judge is incorrect or perverse. No case for invocation for revisional jurisdiction is made out. Criminal revision application is, therefore, rejected. JUDGE wwl