IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20188 of 2010 RAFFIUDDIN KHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 04.02.2011 Petitioner is the husband and apprehends arrest in Complaint Case NO.613 of 2009 instituted under Section 498A of the Indian Penal code and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act which is pending before the C.J.M, Kaimur at Bhabua. Learned counsel pursuant to notice issued by this Court to the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the very opening line of the complaint would show that the complaint is ostensible for some other marital discord, the opening line itself that the petitioner and the complainant were married more than twenty years back in the complaint. It is alleged that now a demand of dowry is being made which on the face of its discord. Dowry will be demanded or paid for children of the petitioner and not for the petitioner himself. Be that as it may, in the event of his arrest or surrender, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M, Kaimur in Complaint Case No. 613 of 2009,subject to the conditions, as laid down under section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Namita ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)