SE^ INTHEraGHOOURTOFCHHAmSGARH AT K WatPetttionNo.3.^i/2(XB Pls'l'U'lONER <^ .<--.^'. 'y/ Ltt'yfcG.1'7 : Chaitd»MBniMirfirai.S/oLateSni&& Mdm, LD.C, AoaBt»tGtade-D, B.EO. Ofitoer, K/o Gulab Oalotiy Gdndhi Gtowk / AaMkapur(CG). -VMSU&- : 1. State of CMhattiBgarfi, Thtot^ittieSecnetaiy, AadtaiJaUTetha AmiBudtlt Jati "Wkas \Udifl& Murtralaya, DJKSi Ehawan, Swstri Qiowl;, Raipur(CG.) 2. GwnrissMmer, Afldimjati Tettia AnususMt Jati 'Wkas \aUh<^ Rupur(CQ). 3. UnderSecretaty, AadimjatiTetha AnuBudnt Jati^kas 'WUiag, Raqxir. ^" / WRIT PEriTION UNDER ARTICLE 226/22^ OF THE CONSTntmON OF INDIA FOR EXTENSICaf6FTa TO MOVE REPRESENTATION. Details of <he prfition. RESPONESENFS y/ CK' .^^<'.>-^- ^^ ,-''^^'' t XI-HC-22 7SI ^KtlcCT, ^frOTSTT^TRiy ..^.^^fi^/^ ^ ^IICTI Sh<11<ft sn^T'^ii h-ii'K sn^i WRWHf?TT an^i ^arar ^fs^i sbl^Td^l'1 TTFT^f ^ 'feT^ <r3l'^H. ^rsif^sn^i Advocnte for the State/ respondents. 01.11.20W Shri Prashant JoyasNrol, counsel|for •ttie petitioner. Shri ftonbir Stogh Marhas, 6ovt. Heard both the counsel. By this wrtt petition imder Artiejle 226/227 of the Constitution of India, rtte petitioner hos chatterged the ord<sr|d<ri'ed03.09.2003 by which he has be<sn transferred from Surgiya to Korea. 'The petitioner is working as A^sistamt Vikas Khand Shikaha Adhikcri, Ambil<4pur, •Hwt he NWS working as Assistant firafte- Shiksha Adhiku'i, Amblldyur «Bid v( transferred froffl Ambikapur (Surgi^) Koreo «mdogmn his tnnsfer order «»<u| tffid he Nraa tnaiaferred to Ambil«pur. vide order dated 03W.2003 he h4s Therefor'e, this exercise cannot be exigency ond this is a matter of freque^t tnmsfer. The leanwd coun«l for the dct'etl 04.08.2003 wos issued after obt^aning the approval of Ihe Ch\ erade-U in the Office of the ', StB'91<Ja The petH'ioner's ccac is tte-H in the Office of the Wtas Uwid y« order dated 01.07.2003 he wws to /tssistont Comnussioner's Office, I cwicelted vide order dated 04.08.2003 But to utter surprise of the petitioner agmn been transfer'red to Korea Itermed us transfer in adniini<str<ttive as per Kie policy guklelines No.5 datec( ll> 1JUM i^- 03.09.2003 hos/issued wirtwut ttie Therefore, on this gnnmd public interest. He further p^titioner submittcd 'rtiat ewiiw order after obt^aning the approval of Ihe Oiief Mlnister 15.05.2002, wihweaa, Ihe order dated coneu'rence of the Chief Minister. is bad, wbitrory <nd not in dubmitte^ that the petitfofler nwy be ollowed to ^, [•q^-^g^ also the trorfisfer order XI-HC-22 311^1 ^T •M?;3ni^i ;»)^Wyfs^f Soma .. ^i -^'1>'^/^ ^^ '^iraRTq, '®^ftOTS,iiwiyy ani^r •q?ra? ..^..S.SD^ WHcn tbXlch 200_-<, •Sn^TTCTWTETfed - 2-4 moke o representation roising all his tearned ffovernment Advocate hos n<> Havin9 heard •the lennwul the facta and circunwtancca of the been transferred -thrice tiii'thin a petitioner hcs atleged that the approvol of the Chief Minister in circumst<mces, the petittoner is reapondent No.3 witttin tcn turn, respondent No.3 ahatl deckte the dtrt'e of receipt of •the repr<4 reosoned order. Till then.the petiti); r-elieved. co<mset 4ase, tlayaL.fr{>m the pre^entati of. <M<iid^"ii ^wv^ ^ ^y^ ^i^R ^SlPaq 311^1 Igrievtnce to respondent No.3 to wihieh the objection. for the porties ond hming regtn-d to :, menttoned above os thc pctitioner has ^eriod of twp mwiths and moreover, the preajnt trnnsfcr has been effccted without thc of 'rtie tronsfer policy, in the given |<rfloi*ed to md<e o representation to todoy naain9 atl her grievancea <md in representotlon within thh*ty days from spre^entation. in an objective manner with a petiti^ner should not be relieved, if already not Wfth the above observations ^md directtond the petitton stands diaposed Consequently, M.(W.y.No.27^2/2003<nd I.A.No.8977/2003 also stond disposed of. Porties cre entitled for certif|ed copy of this order. Sd'- _, L-C.B^000 iudge [ift^^fig^