1 903.s-396-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi SUIT NO. 396 OF 2011. Niranjanlall R. Sanghai. ..Plaintiff. vs. Sushilkumar N. Sanghai & Ors. ..Defendants. .... Mr. Girish Kedia, i/b. Divya S. Sanghavi, for Plaintiff. Mr. Sanjay Jain, i/b. Lalit V. Jain, for Defendant No.1. Mr. Manoj G. Agre, for Defendant No.6. .... CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 25TH NOVEMBER 2011. P.C. : The learned Advocates appearing for the Plaintiff, on instructions state that the Plaintiff is not desirous of continuing the Suit against the Defendant Nos. 2, 3 ,4 and 5 and the Suit be dismissed for want of prosecution. In view thereof, the Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution against the Defendant Nos. 2,3, 4 and 5. The Learned Advocates for the parties now tender consent terms dated 25th November 2011 which are entered into by and between the Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 1 and 6. They submit that the consent terms be taken on record and the Suit be disposed of in terms of the consent terms. 2. The consent terms dated 25th November 2011 are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The consent terms are signed by the Plaintiff, Defendant No. 1 and Defendant No.6. The consent terms are also signed by the Advocate for the Plaintiff as well 2 903.s-396-11 as the Advocates for the Defendant Nos. 1 and 6. The undertakings given in the consent terms are accepted. 3. The Plaintiff has informed the Court that he understands English and has understood the contents of the consent terms and has signed the same of his own free will and volition without any force, fraud or collusion. 4. By consent of the parties, the date ‘10th September 2011’ mentioned in clause 14 of the consent terms be read as ‘10th December 2011’. 5. The Suit is disposed of in terms of the consent terms marked ‘X’ as modified by clause 4 above. Refund of Court fees, if any, as per Rules. In view thereof, Notice of Motion No. 566 of 2011 also stands disposed of. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]