IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.345 of 2009 1. BIPIN BIHARI UPADHYAY S/O LATE RAM KAILASH UPADHYAY R/O VILL- NAUTAN, P.O. EKMA, P.S. EKMA, DISTT. SARAN (CHAPRA) Versus 1. AWADH BIHARI SHARAN UPADHYAY S/O LATE RAM KAILASH UPADHYAY 2. SURYA UPADHYAY S/O LATE RAMKAILASH UPADHYAY 3. DIP NARAYAN UPADHYAY S/O BHAGWATI SHARAN UPADHYAY 4. JAGNARAYAN UPADHYAY S/O BHAGWATI SHARAN UPADHYAY 5. MOSTT. MIRA DEVI W/O SATYA NARAYAN UPADHYAY 6. MUKESH UPADHYAY S/O SATYANARAYAN UPADHYAY 7. BRIJESH UPADHYAY S/O SATYANARAYAN UPADHYAY 8. DEVNARAYAN UPADHYAY S/O BHAGWATI SHARAN UPADHYAY ----------- 3 8.9.2010 The review of the order , sought for, was passed after Pleader Commissioner Report wherein Court accepted that there was a house but the Court was of the opinion that the house was not occupied and was not being used as such. The order was passed in presence of the parties .There was typographical mistake, which was also on mentioning of the parties corrected subsequently but now thereafter this review application was filed virtually asking for re-hearing the matter. In my view, order having been passed after hearing the parties cannot be reviewed. If any party is aggrieved he has remedy, as available. However, parties are at liberty to mention the matter before an appropriate bench for early hearing as this is a matter of 1983. This application is accordingly disposed of. singh ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)