IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.3408/2011 Date of decision: 23.05.2011. Dharam Singh ....................Petitioner v. Amarjit Kaur @ Harmeet Kaur .....................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.Karanjit Singh,Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) Husband/petitioner in the present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has assailed the order dated 4.5.2011 (P1) whereby the learned Family Court during the divorce proceedings initiated by the husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act has directed the husband to bring the minor elder son residing with him, on the next date of hearing. It is not disputed that the elder minor son of the petitioner and respondent wife is residing with the husband whereas the other minor son and daughter are residing with the wife. The two minor children are brought in the court by the wife seemingly to meet their father. In my opinion, the direction given by the learned Family Court directing the petitioner/husband also to bring the elder minor son to be present on the next date of hearing, obviously to meet his mother and the other siblings suffers from no illegality or irregularity, warranting interference by this court in the present proceedings under Article 227 of the Constitution. In fact such a direction is reasonable and justified and causes no prejudice to the petitioner. Dismissed. 23.05.2011 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge