IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7217 of 2011 KAMLA NEHRU MAHILA PHYSICAL TRAINING COLLEGE BAIRIYA MUZAFFARPUR THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT KRISHNA TIWARI S/O LATE FIRANGI TIWARI, R/O VILL –BAIRTYA PS- AHIYAPUR DISTT- MUZAFFARPUR----------------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIBAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECY. HUMAN RESORUCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARATMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PANTA 3. THE JOINT SECY. DEPTT. OF ART CULTURE& YOUTH GOVT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DIRECRTOR PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE CHAIRMAN BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD, PATNA 6. THE SECY. HSEB, PATNA 7. THE CHAIRMAN NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION NEW DELHI------------------------RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 28.6.2011 Petitioner is also one of those mushrooming institutions which had come up in late eighties or early nineties only to make a quick buck because these institutions were not worth anything. If they would have provided proper facility and infrastructure to the students, who took admission with a hope for good education and a degree having merit the institution would have provided brighter future. But the facts speak for themselves as to what is the status of this institution because after the students failed to beget any relief from the High Court to get examination held for various sessions, the institution has turned up in the present writ seeking direction upon the respondents to permit them to conduct examination relating to session beginning 1990-91 and ending in the years 1997-98. Thereafter certain changes came about relating to their recognition under N.C.T.E. Act. If the institution was worth anything there would have been some recognition given by the National Council for - 2 - Teachers Education thereafter, but there is no material to show that this institution was in any manner serious in imparting education or had concern about the future of the students. The fact that no examinations have been held for any of the sessions beginning 1990-91 till date speaks for itself. There is difficulty for this Court now to give direction to do so after more than 20 years having elapsed. It will be a futile direction leading to nothing because education imparted 20 years ago now has lost all relevance. Except for the institution to make a quick buck no body shall get benefit. This writ application is a misplaced kind of application and it is dismissed as such. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)