IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 3RD MAY 2011 / 13TH VAISAKHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 2778 of 2011() ---------------------------------- CMP.725/2011 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, KATTAKADA CR. NO.11/2011 OF KATTAKKADA EXCISE RANGE .................... PETITIONER/ACCUSED --------------------------- SEELAVATHI,D/O JOYIS,KIZHAKKUMKARA VEEDU KANIYAMKONAM,KUNNAMPARA DESOM,MALAYINKEEZHU VILLAGE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.G.P.SHINOD SRI.RAM MOHAN.G. RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT -------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR AT HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/05/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: svs V. RAMKUMAR, J. ---------------------- Bail Application No.2778 of 2011 --------------------- DATED: 03.05.2011 O R D E R In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner, who is the sole accused in C.R. No.11/2011 of Kattakkada Excise Range for offences punishable under sec.8(1) and 8(2) of the Abkari Act for allegedly having been found in possession of 20 litres of arrack, seeks her enlargement on bail. 2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application contending, inter alia, that the petitioner is involved in two other crimes of similar nature. 3. It is too early to accept the petitioner's contention that she has been falsely implicated in the case. Moreover, I am not satisfied that both the grounds enumerated under sec.41A (b)(ii) of the Abkari Act are present in this case so as to justify his release on bail. With the above observation this Application is dismissed. V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. sj B.A.No. 2