IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Contempt Petition No. 252 of 2008 Hira Ballabh Joshi …Petitioner Vs. Sri S.Desi Raju …Respondent Sri B.Mehra, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Manoj Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner Sri H.M. Raturi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, ACJ This contempt petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Court Act has been filed by the petitioner, praying therein that the respondent be summoned and punished for committing willful disobedience of the order dated 26.07.2007 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 6527 (S/S) of 2001, Hira Ballabh Joshi Vs. State of U.P. & others. 2. This Court on 26.07.2007 has passed the following order:- “In view of the above, petitioner is directed to make representation before respondent no. 4 for redressal of his grievance within a period of three weeks from today and respondent no. 4 shall pass appropriate order on the representation of the petitioner within a period of three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order alongwith representation. With this direction, writ petition as well as all the pending applicants are disposed of. No order as to costs.” 3. The compliance affidavit has been filed by the respondent and the respondent in paragraph 6 of the affidavit of compliance has stated that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided vide order dated 02.02.2009. The order dated 02.02.2009 has been filed as annexure No. 1 to the affidavit of compliance. 4. For the reasons stated above, I am of the view that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. I an, therefore, of the view that there is no justification in keeping the contempt petition pending now. 5. For the reasons stated above, the contempt petition is dismissed. The notice issued against the respondents are hereby discharged. (B.C. K., ACJ.) 25.02.2009 ASWAL