BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.N. BASHA CRL OP(MD) No.16203 of 2011 1 M.MANI 2 M.K.PALANIAMMAL 3 K.BABU ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Vs STATE, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL IN CR.NO. 75/2010 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.P.SENGUTTUARASAN, Advocate For Respondent : M/S.C.RAMESH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 294(b) and 506(i) I.P.C. in Crime No.75 of 2010 on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been arrayed as A1, A6 and A7 and they have been implicated on the allegation that the petitioners said to have helped the legal-heirs of the complainant in respect of executing a sale deed and the alleged occurrence took place in the year 1996. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. 3. Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the the petitioners have been arrayed as A1, A6 and A7 and they have been implicated on the allegation that the petitioners said to have helped the legal-heirs of the complainant in respect of executing a sale deed. It is submitted that the investigation is pending. 4. The fact remains that the alleged incident said to have taken place as early as in the year 1996 in which the petitioners said to have helped the legal-heirs of the complainant in respect of executing a sale deed. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with one surety for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said learned Judicial Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners 1 and 3 shall report before the respondent police daily at 5.30 p.m. for a period of four weeks and thereafter, they shall be available for interrogation as and when required and the second petitioner being a lady, she shall be available for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 19/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II DINDIGUL 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL +1. CC to M/S.N.RANJITH Advocate SR.No.44563 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16203 of 2011 Date :19/12/2011 SMA/21.12.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/