IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.17126 of 2011 Date of Decision : September 13, 2011. Gurvinder Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Peeush Gagneja, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Let three copies of the writ petition be supplied to the learned State counsel during the course of day failing which the order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the respondents at this stage. CWP No.17126 of 2011 [2] The petitioner seeks a direction for the medical re- imbursement which is stated to have been with-held by the respondents for no reason whatsoever. As per the averments made in the writ petition, the petitioner submitted the medical bills for Rs.59,798/- way back on 29.10.2007 but nothing has been re-imbursed to him so far. In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to process and dispose of the petitioner's pending claim for medical reimbursement, within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Dasti. September 13, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE