1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Writ Petition No.4562 of 2008 [Ku. Pratibha A. Putting Vs. Dy. Dir. of Edn. & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Ms. P.A. Mahashabde, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Fulzele, AGP for respondent no.1. ----- CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE AND A.H. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 23rd October,2008. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, who was appointed as a Shikshan Sevak on hourly basis and in three different academic years. The petitioner is seeking to challenge the decision taken by the respondent no.1 who absorbed the surplus teacher, i.e., respondent no.4, under the respondent no.2-College. Undoubtedly, a Shikshan Sevak, who was appointed on hourly basis, has no vested right for being regularized as Asstt. Teacher or a Lecturer in a Junior College and,therefore, we are satisfied that the challenge raised by the 2 petitioner cannot be considered. Petition is, therefore, rejected. Judge Judge |Hedau|