IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39141 of 2009 PINTU KUMAR @ PINTU RAI @ AJAY KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5. 2.7.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission in a Police case under Sections 289, 308, 402, 269 and 304 of the Penal Code is that the informant in his deposition in Court has stated nothing against the petitioner. The allegations are that the petitioner is the compounder of one Dr. R.P. Gupta. The informant took his son to the clinic for operation of appendix when he fell ill. During the operation both the kidneys were removed. Paragraph 55 of the case diary dealing with the Post Mortem Report confirms the absence of both kidneys in the body of the deceased. Co-accused granted bail was the owner of the premises, the petitioner being the compounder stands distinguished from the accused, granted bail. The application is dismissed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)