IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.41697 of 2009 SUNIL KUMAR, S/O KAPILDEO PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR **** /4/ 08.02.2010 Heard both the sides. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 395 and 397of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner was caught right at the spot when the injured, the informant, attempted to stop the loot, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, who has two other cases against him, at this stage. 4. The prayer for bail is rejected. S.A. (Anjana Prakash, J.)