IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.39 OF 2007 Ravinder Singh Arora & Ors. ...Appellants Versus Maninder Kaur @ Meena Arora & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Prasad S.Dani for Appellants. Mr.Sanjay Jain with Mr.Dipesh U.Siroya i/b L.J.Law for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.I.Memon for Respondent No.2. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. MARCH 1, 2007. MARCH 1, 2007. MARCH 1, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The only grievance made before this Court in the present Appeal is that the observation made by the lower Court will come in the way of the Appellants to contest the proceedings before the Trial Court. Needless to observe that the observation made in the impugned order is only for consideration of grant of ad-interim relief to the : 2 : Plaintiffs. It is clarified that the Trial Court may decide the main proceedings namely the Notice of Motion as well as the Suit on its own merits in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the observations in the impugned order. 2. With this clarification, Appeal stands disposed of. This order is not an expression of opinion of acceptance of the stand of either party on merits. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.