IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 8TH JUNE 2009 / 18TH JYAISHTA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 350 of 2009(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.2863/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER: ---------------------------------- DEVIKARANI, AGED 46 YEARS, D/O.CHAMBAKAVALLY, CHITRALAYAM, PUNALUR VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY SRI.ABHILASH MATHEW SRI.ADEEP ANWAR RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT IN WPC: ---------------------------------------------------- K.V.SOMANATHAN, AGED ABOUT 46, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER WORKING AS VILLAGE OFFICER, PUNALUR. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ Contempt Case (Civil) NO. 350 OF 2009 (S) ============================== Dated this the 8th day of June, 2009 J U D G M E N T The allegation in this petition is regarding the non compliance of the judgment of this Court in WP(C) No.2863/09 where this Court had directed to pass orders on Ext.P2 filed by the petitioner seeking to get the property mentioned therein mutated and for acceptance of tax. 2. Learned Government Pleader has obtained instructions, which states that the respondent could not pass orders as directed on account of the alleged non co-operation of the other two legal heirs of the thandapper holder. It is also stated that this fact has been intimated to the petitioner vide letter NO.B7-4375/09 dated 23.3.2009 of the Additional Tahsildar, Pathanapuram. 3. In view of the instruction to the aforesaid effect, I do not find any willful disobedience of the direction in the judgment warranting further proceedings. COC No.350/09 :2 : Therefore, this petition is closed leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue her legal remedies. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp