1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 800/2011 (Pramod Babanrao Dhande VERSUS Deputy Director, Health Service & another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri V.G. Wankhede, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : MARCH 28 , 2011 . Heard. On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the impugned order dated 22.06.2010, it appears that the Labour Court, Amravati did not commit any error in rejecting the reference and holding that the petitioner had failed to prove that his services were wrongly terminated by the respondents by violating the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Court, on a proper appreciation of the documents on record, came to a conclusion that the petitioner had not worked for 240 days during the year prior to the date of his alleged termination. The Court found on a reading of the document at Exh.47 that the petitioner worked with the respondents only on Sundays and public holidays or when the regular employees of the respondents were on leave. The findings recorded by the Labour Court are pure findings of facts and call for no interference in exercise of the writ jurisdiction. 2 The writ petition fails and is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE APTE