1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 118 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 118 OF 2006 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 118 OF 2006 IN IN IN CIVIL REVN.APPLICATION St.NO.21692 OF 2006 CIVIL REVN.APPLICATION St.NO.21692 OF 2006 CIVIL REVN.APPLICATION St.NO.21692 OF 2006 Shri Ravi Shevakram Ramchandani. .. Applicant Versus Smt. Etabai Laxmishankar Tiwari. .. Respondents ... Mr. S.V. Dhakephalkar for the applicant. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 17th November 2006 DATED : 17th November 2006 DATED : 17th November 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant. None present for the respondent though served by affidavit of service dated 16th November 2006 sworned by Ajay Sarwankar. 2. Perused the affidavit of Ravindra Repal, clerk for the petitioner’s Advocate, wherein he has stated that 2 the wrong information was given by him about the certified copy. For the reasons stated in this application and confirmed in the affidavit of Ravindra Repal, the delay of 75 days in filing Civil Application is condoned in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to payment of Rs.500/- to Kirtikar Law Library, High Court, Mumbai. The cost shall be paid within two weeks by Mr. Ravindra Repal, who has given the wrong information to the Advocate about the certified copy. (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J)