IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15219 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 25, 2010. M/s Anil Trading Company and others .....Petitioners versus State Bank of India and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Aman Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners seek a mandamus to direct the respondent- Bank to release their properties situated at Rampura Phul in view of various offers made by them for compromise. It appears that despite the affidavits sworn in by the petitioners as well as the prospective buyer, namely, Vijay Kumar who has already submitted an affidavit before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Chandigarh with an undertaking to pay the entire amount within a reasonable period of three months, the respondent-bank is adamant to auction the `secured assets'. Since the Debts Recovery Tribunal is seized of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with at this stage except to direct the Debts Recovery Tribunal to keep in view the stand taken by the C.W.P.No .15219 of 2010 2 petitioners and impress upon the bank to enable the petitioners and the prospective buyer to pay the entire dues and save their properties. If the petitioners still have any grievances, they may approach this Court at an appropriate stage. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 25, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE