IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 24TH JULY 2007 / 2ND SRAVANA 1929 WP(C).No. 12663 of 2005(G) ------------------------------------ OS.57/2005 of MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR .................... PETITIONER: ----------------- P.V.POULOSE, AGED 83 S/O.VARKEY, PUTHENKUDY HOUSE MUDAKKIRAI KARA, RAYAMANGALM VILLAGE KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.JOY GEORGE RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(LA) NATIONAL HIGH WAY NO.2, ALUVA. 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD KSTP DIVISION REST HOUSE, COMPOUND, MUVATTUPUZHA 4. ANI, W/O.ANTONY, ALAVAMKUDY HOUSE, KOOVAPPADY KARA, KOOVAPADY VILLAGE 5. SUBIN , S/O.JAMES ELAVAMKUDY HOUSE KOOVAPPADY KARA , KOOVAPPADY VILLAGE. 6. SHAJU,S/O.PAPPU MANAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, PERUMBAVOOR KARA PERUMBAVOOR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR FOR R4 AMD R5 SRI.BABY KURIAKOSE GOVERNEMNT PLEADER SRI. SHYSON P. MANGUZHA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.12663 of 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated: 24th July, 2007 JUDGMENT The petitioner who is a building tenant in occupation of a building has filed this Writ Petition seeking to restrain the Government and also the landlords from what is described as forcibly dispossessing the petitioner from the building. Though interim relief was sought for this court did not become inclined to grant the same. The learned Government Pleader submits that the Government only invoked the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act so that the property including the building occupied by the petitioners could be acquired for a public purpose. No representation for the petitioner. According to me, the very locus standi of the petitioner to file the Writ Petition is very much in doubt. At any rate, since this court did not grant the stay, the reliefs sought for in the Writ Petition have become infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. srd PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE