CMPMO No.173/2003 22.06.2010 Present: Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Subhash Sharma, counsel for respondent No.2. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in fact at the instance of the petitioners, reference under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, has been made to the District Judge, Bilaspur, in which the petitioners have made the claim that they alone are entitled to the entire compensation money, to the exclusion of respondent No.2. In view of this statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed being infructuous. It is made clear that only that party will be entitled to compensation, which will be held so in the reference proceedings initiated at the instance of the petitioners. June 22, 2010(sd) (Surjit Singh), J.