C:Fl7-o^ IN THE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.V WRIT PETITION (S) N0. '2-^ ^DF 200^ 7 PETmQNERS ^. y\/ L^-y. .^w/\ )A^V ^* ^Vl^. •^ 1. Ramadhar Dugga Son of Shri Shyam Singh Dugga, aged about 40 years, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Birkondal, Block Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C.G.). 2. Smt. Baesakin Lawatre Wife of Sbri Ramesh Kumar Lawatre, aged about 54 years, Assistant Teacher Primary School Kokde, Block Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C.G.). _3. Ishwarilal Prajapati Son of Late Shri Patiram Prajapati, aged about 45 years, Assistant Teacher Primary School Karmoti, Block Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C.G.). 4. Yadavram Gharat Son of Shri Heeralal Gharat, aged about 44 years, Assistant Teacher Primary School Selegaon, Block Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C.G.). 5. Bodhiram Koreti Son of Late Shri Kunwar Singh Koreti, 8. aged .about 43 years, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Mungwal, .Block Bhanupratappur, District Kanker.(C.G-). i Sykdevram Sarphe Son of Shri Mangturam Sarphe, aged about 40 years, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Tetapara, Block Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C.G.). Shankarlal Tandiya Son of Sferi Ram Prasad Tandiya, aged about 41 years, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Chichmara, Block Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C.G.). Dipak Kumar Uike Son of Late Shri Guharam Uike, aged about .39 years, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Jepra, Block Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C.G.). Girdharilal Nareti Son of Shri AJabsingh Nareti, aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher Primary School Hatkarra, Block Bhanupratappur, District Kanker(C.G-). / 10. Tulsiram Uike Son of Late Shri Kanwal Singh Uike, aged about 41 years, Assistant Teacher Primary School Ghotiya, Block Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C.G.). 11. Denendrapal Netam Son of Late Shri Jirodhan Singh Netam, aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Chilhati, Block Bhanupratappur, > District Kanker (C.G.). 12. Brijlal Potai Son of Shri Mahettarram Potai, aged about 43 years, Assistant Teacher Primary School Radwahi, Block Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C.G.). 13. Dehruram Kulhariya Son of Shri Milap Kulhariya, aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher Primary School i Chaugel, Block Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C.G.). 14. . Mangturam Nag Son of Shri Bhadauram Nag, aged about 39 years, Assistant Teacher Primar/ Schoot Junwani, Block Bhanupratappur, Kanker (C.G.). District RESPONDENTS ,15. Ram Singh Negi Son of Shri Dayaram Negi, aged about 47 years, Assistant Teacher Primary School Alwarkhurd, Block Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C.G.). 16. Smt. Shayamwati Gour Wife of Shri C. S. Gour, aged about 51 years, Assistant Teacher Girls Primary School Bhanupratappur, Block Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C.G.). 17. Hemant Kumar Kuldeep Son of Shri Itwariram Kuldeep, aged about 38 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Higher Secondary School Selegaon, Block Bhanupratappur, District Kanker (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare D. K. S. Shawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Raipur (C.G.). asi M ^a^ ^^1 S%§B ss:'ss •I M\ M ^S^B^'ffiSsSi ( ^^^^t ^ i. .^3. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Kanker District Bastar (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, . MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS. DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS_. HI6H CGURT OF CHHATTISS^RH AT BILAaHJR W. P. fSl No. 2% of 2007 Petitioners Verajs Reqsondents State of dhattisqarh and o^iers SB; Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish SC. Agnihotri. J P.P. Sdhu, Adwcate for -the petitioners. Miss Sunita Jain, Pcne! lawyer for the re-apo Oft&ER (Passed on 19th day of Swwsey, 2007) The foliowing order of the Court ispassed by Satish (C. Agnihotri, J. 1. Leamed counsel cippearing for tiie petitbners as we!! as ieamed PaneS Lawyer cypearing for the r-espondents/State jointly submit that the facts of the present caea. are similar to +hat of in W. P- (s) 3846 of 2005 (K. Jai Narnycn Singh & others Vs. State of M.P. (Now <3th<rttiS9afh) & o-thera), which was disposed of vide order dated 12 December, 2006. They further ajbmit that the question of iaw involved is also the saroe. 2. In view of the above stated submissions made by learned counse! for the parl-ies, ttie writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order da.tsd 12th &acambet-, 2006 pasaed by this Court in W. P. (s) 3846 of 2005. No order as to costs. Babiu Sd/-. SatishK.Agnihom Judge