^ (D IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.l iMfilE \V) W.P.f2271 N0. /2011 PETITIONER PLAINTIFF Harishankar Tripathi, S/o. Late Shyam Bilas Tripathi, aged about 76 years, R/o. Masanganj Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS DEFENDANTS / :1^ Sushil Kumar Dubey, aged about41 years, -S/o. Late Shri Shivmangal Prasad Dubey, R/o. Mishra Pustkalaya, First Floor, Masanganj, Bilaspur, Tahsil and Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. 3. 4. ..•• .*' .*' y //../ ..••'' ^\ ^.^w^ <t/,^'\v" • ^•§r" 5./ Smt. Premlata Dubey, W/o. Late Rajendra Dubey, R/o. Mishra Pustkalaya, First Floor, Masanganj, Bilaspur, Tahsil and Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) at present resident of Takhatpur, Tahsil-Takhatpur, Tikaripara, Tahsil - Takhatpur, Dist. Bilaspur(C.G.) Ku. Arpita Dubey, aged about 18 years, D/o. Late Rajendra Dubey Ku. Mili Dubey, aged about 14 years, D/o. Late Rajendra Dubey, Minor through : natural guardian mother Smt. Hemlata Dubey, Wd/o. Late Rajendra Dubey, No.3 and 4 R/o. Near Mishra Pustkalaya, Masanganj, Bilaspur, Tahsil and Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) at present resident of Takhatpur, Tahsil-Takhatpur, Tikaripara, Tahsil - Takhatpur, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.). Sudhir Kumar Dubey, aged about 37 years, S/o. Late Shri Shivmangal Prasad Dubey, R/o. Sarju Bagicha Masanganj, Near House of Ex-Ward Member Mina Pandey, Bilaspur, Tahsiland Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 0 HIGH COORTOF CHHATnSGARHAT BUASPUR WRFT PETmON (227) No. 209/20 11 PETITIONEai HarishankarTripathi Versus RBSPONDENTS Sushil Kiimar Dubey and others SBs- HON'BLESHRI N.K. AGARWAL. J PRESBNT:- Shri Rainakant Pandey, Advocate, for the respondent. Shri M.K. Sinha, Adv. for therespondent No. 5. ORAL ORDER (11-5-2011) 1. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition can be disposed of wifh a direction to the tiial coiirt to decide the sult within a specific Gme frame. 2. Prayer is reasonable. 3. In view of above, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that fhe trial Court shaU decide the siiit as early as possible preferably wifhin a period of one year fl-om the date of receipt of copy of ttus order. Sd//- N.K. Agrawal Judge ^i.^x.^'':.:.',—^