IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 6TH JANUARY 2009 / 16TH POUSHA 1930 WP(Crl.).No. 467 of 2008(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- BEENA @ BEENA SUNNY, KOODAPARAMBIL HOUSE, PERIKALLOOR.P.O, WAYANAD DISTRICT NOW RESIDING AT VALIPLACKAL, KOODARANHI.P.O, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.FIROZ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KUNJAMMA, W/O. SATHEESAN, AGED 52 YEARS, PARVATHY HOTEL, KODUNGOOR, VAZHOOR.P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL), KOTTAYAM. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALLIKATHODE POLICE STATION, NEAR KANJIRAPPALLI, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.N.P.SETHU FOR R1 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI NOBLE MATHEW FOR R2 & R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE DATED 27.3.2008 ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JOINT COMPROMISE PETITION DATED 6,.5.2008 BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE FIRST RESPONDENT EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 6.5.2008 PASSED BY THIS COURT EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE KODUVALLI POLICE DATED 20.12.2008 EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE THIRUVAMBADI POLICE DATED 20.12.2008 EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FORWARDED TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 20.12.2008 BY THE PETITIONER RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: EXT.R1(a) TRUE COPY OF THE DECLARATION GIVEN UNDER WRITING BY THE PETITIONER EXT.R1(b) TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL GREEN GARDENS SN PUBLIC SCHOOL, THUMBOLI, KOTTAYAM. EXT.R1(c) TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT ADDRESSED TO THE PETITIONER DATED 19.12.2008 EXT.R1(d) TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT EVIDENCING THE ISSUANCE OF EXT.R1(c) EXT.R1(e) TRUE COPY of the POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT OF THE R1(c) BY THE PETITIONER //TRUE COPY// A.K.BASHEER & THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JJ. -------------------------------------- W.P.(Criminal) No.467 of 2008 S -------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of January, 2009. JUDGMENT Basheer, J. Petitioner who is admittedly the mother of Justin E.Simon, a minor aged 8 years, has filed this Writ Petition praying for a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to release the said minor child from the illegal custody of respondent No.1 and to handover the child to her. It is alleged by the petitioner that respondent No.1 has been keeping the minor child in her illegal custody, against his wish. She further alleges that the life of the child will be in danger if he is allowed to remain in the custody of the respondent No.1. It is the case of the petitioner that she will be able to get admission for the child in a nearby school where she is now residing even though it is half way through the academic year. 2. It is beyond controversy that the minor child has been in the custody of the respondent No.1 for more than five years now. Ext.P2 will show that in the course of the previous round of litigation, petitioner and respondent No.1 had agreed upon certain terms and conditions regarding the custody of the child. The Writ Petition [W.P.(Criminal) No.112 of 2008] filed by the petitioner was disposed of by this Court recording the compromise entered into between the parties as evidenced by Ext.P3, judgment dated 6.5.2008. WP(crl.) No.467/2008 2 3. According to the petitioner, she has allowed the child to continue in the custody of the respondent No.1 having regard to the welfare of the child but, now she is no more in a position to accept respondent No.1 as the custodian of the child for various reasons. 4. We do not propose to deal with the issue any further at this stage in view of our discussion with the petitioner in the course of hearing of the Writ Petition. Petitioner stated before us that she is prepared to wait till the end of the current academic year, if only she is able to get custody of the child after completion of the academic year. 5. Respondent No.1 is also present in the court along with minor child. We had requested Sr.Teena, an Advocate practicing in this Court to talk to the parties. Learned counsel submits that the child is not very keen to go with the mother and he appears to be comfortable and happy with respondent No.1. Yet again we refrain from making any observation in that regard. 6. In view of the submission made by the petitioner who is admittedly the mother of the minor child, we are satisfied that no orders need be passed in this case at this juncture. Moreover, considering the welfare of the minor we are of the view that if the prayer made by the petitioner is to be allowed at this stage, it will adversely affect the education of the child who is reportedly studying in a WP(crl.) No.467/2008 3 school nearby the residence of the respondent No.1. In any view of the matter, it cannot be said that respondent No.1 is keeping custody of the child illegally, since admittedly the petitioner has willingly agreed to keep the child in the custody of respondent No.1 as revealed from Ext.P2. But all said and done petitioner is indisputably the mother of the minor child. But question of custody cannot be considered in this proceeding. 7. We make it clear that we have not considered the merit or tenability of the contentions raised by the petitioner. It will be open to the petitioner to approach the competent Court seeking custody of the child in accordance with law. Writ Petition is closed. A.K.BASHEER, Judge. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE. cks