1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders WRIT PETITION NO.463/2009 Mr.N.S.Choudhary, adv. for petitioner Mr. T.S. Lodhe, Ld. AGP for State. CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 9TH NOVEMBER, 2009. 1. The appeal tendered by the petitioner raising exception to the order of termination before the appellate authority i.e Divisional Jt. Registrar, Co- operative Societies, Nasik Division, Nasik came to be dismissed on account of unreasonable delay occurred in presenting the appeal. The petitioner herein was appointed as a Secretary of society and by virtue of order passed on 31.03.2005, his services came to be terminated by the competent authority. Petitioner herein raises challenge to the order of termination by presenting writ petition in the year 1999 before this Court however said petition came to be disposed off with liberty to petitioner to approach Cooperative Authorities. Order was passed by this court on 21.09.2002. Accordingly petitioner preferred an appeal to the Divisional Joint 2 Registrar, Co-operative Societies Nasik Division, Nasik. Appellate authority found that delay occurred in filing the appeal is unreasonable and has not been properly explained by the petitioner. 2. I have perused the impugned order passed by the Divisional Jt. Registrar Cooperative Societies Nashik Division, Nasik. The services of the petitioner came to be dispensed with in the year 1988 and he approached this court in the year 1999 i.e after about 11 years of the passing of the order. Delay occurred in approaching court has not been explained by the petitioner satisfactorily. In approaching the appellate authority there is delay of 14 years 151 days which has not been explained to the satisfaction of the appellate authority. I do not find any ground exists for condoning the unreasonable delay of 14 years and 151 days. The order passed by the appellate authority refusing to condon unreasonable delay is just and proper. No interference is called for in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition therefore stands rejected summarily. [ R. M. BORDE, J. ] ... Dt : 09.11.2009 aaa/463.09