IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1631 of 2005 SURENDRA YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 3.2.2009 Counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time when the vehicle in question, which was seized only for the purpose of election, has already been released, this application has become infructuous. Counsel however submits that the petitioner may have certain claim for rent by way hire charges for the use of his vehicle by the authorities conducting the election. In this opinion of this court, the prayer in this writ application in fact having been confined only against the seizure of the vehicle which has been already released, has become infructuous. If the petitioner has any other grievance, it will be always open for him to agitate the same before an appropriate authority. That being so, this writ application is dismissed as infructuous. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)