IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33698 of 2008 Pulkeet Paswan, son of Mohi Paswan, village Keriya, PS Parbatta, Dist Khagaria – Petitioner. Vs. 1) The State of Bihar, 2) Sushila Devi, wife of Sudhir Muni, village Keriya, Ps Parbatta, Dist. Khagaria – Opp. Parties. 2 12.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed for quashing the entire proceeding against the petitioner in S.C.No. 298/2006, arising out of Parbatta Bharat Khand PS Case No. 42/2006. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire case is fit to be quashed on the ground that there is insufficient material against the petitioner. On perusal of the order, dated 26.7.2007 passed in the aforesaid case it would appear that the petitioner was said to be responsible for kidnapping the girl. Later in the statements under sections 164 and 161 of the Cr.P.C. the victim girl has not named the petitioner as one of the kidnapper. On the basis of the aforesaid fact, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proceeding should be quashed. All these aspects of the case raised on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered during the trial. I am, thus, not inclined to interfere in this case at this stage. This application is dismissed. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)