IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.8124 of 2010 Date of Decision : May 05, 2010. Rajinder Kumar .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This writ petition is directed against the order dated 1.4.2010 (Annexure P-7) whereby the respondents have re-considered the previous order dated 15.9.2006 and have again decided to accord sanction for the petitioner's prosecution in FIR No.51 dated 17.8.2002, registered by the Vigilance Department. The primary contention of the petitioner is that no incriminating act, which led to the registration of the said FIR, is attributable to him and for that reason only that the sanction was initially declined. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length. In my considered view, no case to interfere with the impugned order dated 1.4.2010 (Annexure P-7) by this Court in exercise of its writ C.W.P.No .8124 of 2010 2 jurisdiction, is made out. It will be too far fetched to hold the petitioner innocent at this early stage. Dismissed. This, however, shall not preclude the petitioner to raise his contentions before the learned Special Judge at an appropriate stage. Suffice it to observe that the learned Special Judge shall be obligated to consider those contentions independently and un-influenced of the observations made by the Competent Authority in the order dated 15.9.2006 or in the impugned order dated 1.4.2010 (Annexure P-7). May 05, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE