IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10622 of 2011 Ram Kumar Sharma Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 04. 28.09.2011 Counsel for the petitioner is present. Nobody appears on behalf of the State. Mr. Udit Narain Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the order dated 11.05.2011, the cost was deposited on 13.05.2011, but inadvertently the same could not be filed within time. Subsequently it was filed. The receipt is on record. On perusal of the receipt, it appears that the cost was deposited on 13.05.2011. It is, therefore, directed that the order dated 11.05.2011 shall be deemed to have been carried out. The office has pointed out that by mistake in order dated 11.05.2011, Cr. Misc. No. 972 of 2009 has been typed in place of Cr. Rev. No.792 of 2009. It is clarified that by order dated 11.05.2011, this Court had recalled the order dated 25.02.2011 passed in Cr. Rev. No. 792 of 2009. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )