vsa 1 CP418_2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 418 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders. Mr. A.A. Valsangkar a/w. Mr. Pankaj J. Das, Advocates for the Petitioners CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 23rd December, 2011 P.C.: The breach alleged is of a consent decree passed in the Civil Suit. There are no undertakings incorporated in the consent decree. The decree is already put to execution. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that for one reason or the other, the contemnors have avoided to comply with the consent decree. 2. Admittedly, the decree is capable of being executed. In fact, an Execution Application is already pending. Therefore, this is not a case where jurisdiction under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 can be invoked. Petition is dismissed. (A.S.OKA, J)