1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2245 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.1632 OF 2007 Nilam P. Shinde ....Plaintiff V/s. Anuradha M. Dange & Ors. ....Defendants Ms.Prachi Khandage i/b M/s.M.P. Vashi & Associates for the Plaintiff. Mr.Y.V. Divekar i/b M/s.Divekar & Co. for Defendant No.1. None for Defendant Nos.2 to 5. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2009. P.C. :- 1. The suit is filed for dissolution and accounts of a partnership firm. There were two partners namely Defendant No.1 and one Smt.Leela Yashwant Sawant. The said Smt.Sawant expired in the year 2005. The partnership firm therefore, in any event stood dissolved. 2. The Plaintiff claims a right in the estate of the said deceased. However, the Plaintiff is not related to the deceased in any manner which would entitle her to any interest in her estate. The Plaintiff was not adopted by the deceased. The Plaintiff however, claims that her father married the deceased on 6.12.1974. Even assuming that the deceased did in fact marry the Plaintiff’s father, it would make no difference. The alleged marriage was admittedly during the subsistence of a previous marriage of 2 the deceased with the Plaintiff’s father. The Plaintiff’s mother had expired only in March, 1982. Thus the marriage between the deceased and the Plaintiff’s father on the admitted facts would not be valid in law. 3. Further the registration of the alleged marriage after the death of the Plaintiff’s mother would make no difference for the registration only refers to the alleged marriage of 6.12.1974. 4. In the circumstances, the Notice of Motion is dismissed.