IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 17007 of 2007. Date of Decision: 14th May, 2009. Lakhwinder Singh Petitioner through Mr. Sekhar Verma, Advocate Versus State Transport Commissioner, Punjab & Ors. .Respondents through Mr. G.S.Atttariwala, Addl.AG, Punjab. Mr. H.S.Sawhney, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate. Mr. Baldev Kapoor, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) The petitioner seeks quashing of the orders dated 8.11.2005 and 12.7.2007 [Annexures P-1 and P-4] passed by the State Transport Commissioner and State Transport Appellate Tribunal respectively whereby his claim vis-a-vis respondents No. 3 and 4 for allotment of two Stage Carriage Permits on Nawansahr to Moga route, has been turned down. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties have fairly agreed that their rival contentions need to be re- examined by the Appellate Tribunal, in accordance with law. In view of the agreed stand taken by the parties, the Appellate Tribunal's order dated 12.7.2007 is set aside and the matter is remitted to it to re-decide the inter-se claims of the parties as early as possible but not later than four months from the date a certified copy of this order is received. Till then status-quo shall continue to be maintained. The parties are directed to appear before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab on 9.7.2009. Disposed of. Dasti. May 14, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE