IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31096 of 2008 SUNIL MALAKAR @ DEVENDRA BHANDARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 26.9.2008 Heard. The petitioner is alleged to have solicited the service of the sister of the informant in making candles. He is further alleged to have brought the lady to Barh and from there the sister of the informant is said to be going missing merely on account of this petitioner. Reference has been made to paragraphs 15 to 19 and some other paragraphs of the case diary and it has been contended that the lady was of quite easy virtue and had affairs on many points of time with different persons and she had conceived and miscarried quite often. This statement has been made by many persons and it is said by them that the lady went away with some of them who was entangled with her. Let petitioner named above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.3,000/-(Three thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. District Judge-I, Barh, in connection with Pandarak P.S. case no.30 of 2008 (G.R. no.219 of 2008). sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )