IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 255 of 2010 Rajendra Singh Sahi S/o Late Dhan Bahadur Sahi R/o Village Jaulsal Karayal P.O. Manpur Paschim Tehsil and P.S. Haldwani District Nainital …..…Revisionist Versus 1. Smt. Heera Devi Sahi, W/o Rajendra Singh Sahi 2. Km. Sapna Sahi, D/o Rajendra Singh Sahi 3. Km. Anjali Sahi, D/o Rajendra Singh Sahi 4. Master Rahul, S/o Rajendra Singh Sahi Respondent no. 4 is minor through his natural guardian mother Smt. Heera Devi Sahi All R/o Village Jaulsal Karayal P.O. Manpur Paschim Tehsil & P.S. Haldwani District Nainital ……….Respondents Shri Prem Kaushal, Shri Vishal Singh, and Shri B.S. Bhandari, Advocates, present for the revisionist. Shri Harendra Belwal, Advocate, present for the respondents. Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2 2. This revision is directed against the order dated 16.04.2010, passed by Judge Family Court, Nainital, in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 132 of 2005, whereby said court has directed the revisionist to pay maintenance @ ` 1,200/- per month to his wife (Heera Devi), and ` 1,200/- per month to his son (Rahul) till he attains age of majority. 3. In compliance of order dated 23.12.2010, a supplementary affidavit has been filed by the revisionist enclosing copy of the pension certificate showing his monthly income @ ` 19,575/- per month. It is pleaded on behalf of the revisionist that installments for repayment of loan are also deducted from said amount. It is also pleaded on behalf of the revisionist that he had made deposits in the account of his son as apparent from Annex. 4 to the supplementary affidavit. 4. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties, and after going through the papers on record, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the 3 trial court, as there appears no illegality. Therefore, the revision is dismissed summarily. However, revisionist is allowed to pay the arrears of maintenance (amounting ` 1,63,200/-) in four quarterly installments. The first installment shall be paid by 31.03.2011, and future installments by end of every next quarter. In case of default of any installment the impugned order shall become executable forthwith. (Stay application no. 1466 of 2010, also stands dismissed). (Prafulla C. Pant,J.) Parul 06.01.2011