XI-HG—78 '755T ^|A||<vt^, ^'til-H^Ko, {c«'11-y^< STI^T'^T f<'li<ab '<CT 3?T1^T'SFWF 'L-- - *I(*ICTI »»H|cn ••" "•• • "—^ 200 ^Ti^fTlr^' (T^35^) ^TTW ^rf?H 3TI^?T ContemDtP FETiTIONER RESPONDENTs orta about Kohkaj Versus S, Rd ATitlloii 't'petitloa,ii_nd'er_^ti€le R4in «oni, sgn of Sliri Baiishi Ram, aged |75 years, resident of Village ajid Post Tata Line, District Durg (Chhatusgam) ma Raju, MaG.agiiig Director, Stcel [ty of India Liniited, Bhilai Steel Plajit, Distoct Durg (Chhattisgarh) ilS oftbe coiistitutioa oflndial SB: 28.07.2008 Siiri H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Acl tlie petitioner, Hearci. The petitioner has lil€({ proceedings agaiast the respo|ideut 23rd Apill 2068. passed ra W.tj' disposed ofui the foUowiiig tentis:- "In view ot tiie over^ appeariiig for tlie Flalv would rcconcile the d petitiouer, aiter aJfordiii] petiuouer to put fonyai| weeks from. the receiDt d <snNkl<fli 'HTR^if ^ fs^ <F»i<^i< ^fr 3tfW 3T?^?T itition No. 184/2008 SASfIIBHRA.J vocate with Shri C.K, Sahu, Advocate for this petition for mitiatmg contempt Lcleut. for iiot complytiig the order dated k . No. 1647/96, whereby the petition was aU. settlement, leanied coiinsei ies submit that the autliorities Biount as pouited - out by the ? €«nGT3i2'ortuuit^ of licsj.'iu^ to tlic i his casc, witiim. a pcriod of six fcopyofthe order.?? ^ XI-HG—78 'S^T ^WW^, ^tTl^Ko, [^<rll<H^< ^IHCTI »»*ii<!|»"""""" '""""^ 200 3TI^TTT^F (^qf^q^) -^ The petitiouer siibmitted However, the claiiii oftlie petitio Aiinexure-H, dated 24th June, 2( %in pursuaiice of th of Bilaspur, dated 23, 1647/1996, regaixlmg r< YOU uiider Uie h.e^.d.s of ciaim ibr tlie same, you caJculation of Cpp a-iid G exaiuiiied aiid uave cafculation sheets of C herewith for iafbnnafion, liis applicatiou to tiie responcient. \a€rwas rejected by the respondent vide |Q8 witli the foilowiB.g observations:- Oral Order oftheHigh Court 14.2008 in Writ Petition No. ^couciliiig the amouiit paid to pPF aud Qratuity agaiiist your arc hereoY iaformed fhat tlic k'atuity made by BSP have been befcu Ibuud to be cou'ecL The PF aiid Gratuitv ai-e enciosed As perthe rales oftjlie CGmpmiy, no otlier ^moiiuts ai'e payable to you aiid submitted TD the Honoral From perasal of tlie order tliat tlie respoudent was dire< petitioner after affordiiig oppurt' a period of 6 weeks aiid the ss (AnnexigiF-'H'], 'i'iierelore, no .ca$ The petition is accordiiigry cni€<f<yi<i1vi 1RT1R^ff ^ 'felst <Pn^i< ^l3tRTH3T?^?F ttiis position has ah-eady been ^le Court eariier.?? ^f fhis Court (Annexiire 'AT, il is evident 'ted t.o decide tlie application of tlie inity ofheaiiiig to the petitionerwithiii iBie has beeu decided by the authority e ofcontempt is ma.de oiit dismissed. \ Ohteendra^isbra ' Judge