IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.4906 of 2010 1. RAM PARVESH SAH Son of Indal Sah, 2. Dhanu Sah Son of Ram Chandra Sah 3. Ranjan Kumar Gupta @ Ranjan Sah @ Ranjay Sah, son ofGorakh Sah, 4. Shambhu Sah Son of late Ramayan Sah 5. Tufani Sah son of late Ramayan Sah 6. Sunil Sah son of Ram Pravesh Sah 7. Ramesh Sah @ Rupesh Sah son of Indal Sah 8. Awadhesh Sah @ Adhesh Sah son of Indal Sah Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 30.03.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State as well as informant. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is a case and counter case. He further submits that the police inspector in his report dated 12.11.2009 has not found the case to be true under Section 307 of the I.P.C. Counsel for the informant submits that as many as three persons on his side sustained injuries. The informant sustained five injuries, his brother Imaman Mian sustained seven injuries and one Arif sustained two injuries. Learned counsel for the informant further submits that all the three sustained injuries on their head also. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today before the court below in connection with Shikarpur P.S. case no. 191 of 2009, petitioner nos. 2, 5, 6 and 8 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail - 2 - bonds of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. So far as petitioner nos. 1, 3, 4 and 7 are concerned, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail. Their prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. They should surrender before the court below and seek regular bail within six weeks from today, which would be disposed of without being prejudiced by this order. It will be open to these petitioners to submit before the court concerned that the supervising officer has not found the case to be true under Section 307 of the I.P.C. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)