1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. W. P. No. 5005 of 2008. Milind Poonamchand Naik & another. V. State of Mah. & others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Mr. VK. Gulhane, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram : B.H. Marlapalle and A.H. Joshi, JJ. Dated : 27th November, 2008. Heard Mr. VK Gulhane, the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner. The petitioners were allowed to operate the contract for fishing at the Isapur Reservoir with effect from 1-5-2008 and this contract appears to be for a period of one year. However, Respondent no.2 Corporation issued a circular on 14-5-2008 thereby suspending the fishing by use of some types of nets, and in view of the breeding of some special fish is to start when the water overflow stops in the said reservoir. At the first place, the approach to this Court is 2 belated and secondly, we do not find any error in the decision taken by the respondent no.2 Corporation which is a better Judge on effective fishing as well as the breeding of some special type of fish. We, therefore, do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned decision. Hence, the petition is rejected. This order will not come in the way of the petitioners to submit a representation to respondent no.2 for extension of contract which representation will have to be considered onits own merits. JUDGE JUDGE /Muley/