1 S/2 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6793/2005. Smt. Dhanwanti Meghwal & Ors. Vs. State & Ors. Date of Order :: 23rd July 2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr. M.R. Singhvi, for the petitioners. Mr. Alkesh Aggarwal ] Mr. N.L. Joshi ] Mr. Nitin Trivedi ], for the respondents. ..... BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties. Though the grievance raised in this writ petition by the members of the Panchayat Samiti, Shergarh has been about alleged non-co-operation of, and interference by, the respondent No.3, the then Vikas Adhikari posted with the said Panchayat Samiti and so also by the respondent No.4, who had for some period officiated as such, in the functioning of the Panchayat Samiti but then, during the course of submissions, learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that development works referred in the writ petition have of course been carried out and further that the respondents Nos. 3 and 4 are no longer concerned with the Panchayat Samiti, Shergarh. In view of the changed circumstances, this Court is of opinion that the present petition cannot be said to be carrying 2 a subsisting cause of action and on this count alone, no further proceedings appear requisite or appropriate in this petition. This writ petition is practically rendered redundant and deserves to be dismissed as such. For the issues as involved in this writ petition having not been gone into on merits by this Court, it goes without saying that such disposal of this writ petition shall have no adverse effect on the rights of either of the parties. The writ petition is dismissed with the observations aforesaid. No costs. (DINESH MAHESHWARI ), J. Mohan/