IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 4TH OCTOBER 2011 / 12TH ASWINA 1933 OP(C).No. 3221 of 2011() ------------------------ CMA.93/2011 of DISTRICT COURT, THRISSUR OS.1931/2011 of PRL.MUNSIFF COURT,THRISSUR ......................... PETITIONER: ----------- BHARATHIYA VIDHYABHAVANS VIDHYAMANDIR, NADATHARA VILLAGE, POOCHETTY, THRISSUR TALUK REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, K.S UNNI, S/O KRISHNAN NAMBOODIRI. BY ADV. SRI. T. KRISHNANUNNI, SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI. SAJU S.A. SRI. K.C. KIRAN RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. VINCENT PAUL, S/O PALLISSERI PAUL, AMMADAM AMSOM AND DESOM, P.O. AMMADAM, THRISSUR TALUK, PIN 680 563. 2. STANLY JOHN, S/O ARAKKAL JOHNY, NELLIKKUNNATH DESOM, PO NELLIKKUNNU, THRISSUR TALUK, PIN 680 005. 3. MUKUNDAN, S/O KISHAKKETHOTTUPURAKKAL SEETHAMMA, COCHIN DEVASWOM QUARTERS THRISSUR - 68001 THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BKA OP(C).No. 3221 of 2011() ANNEXURE PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER IN IA: 5742/11 AND IA: 5798/11, DATED 05.07.2011 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF OF THRISSUR. P2: COPY OF THE CMA: 93/2011 ON THE FILE OF DISTRICT COURT, THRISSUR, DATED 15.07.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE BKA THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J. -------------------------------------- O.P.(C) No.3221 of 2011 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of October, 2011. JUDGMENT 1st defendant in O.S.No.1931 of 2011 of the court of learned Principal Munsiff, Thrissur is the petitioner seeking a direction for early disposal of C.M.A.No.93 of 2011 pending in the District Court, Thrissur. 2. Respondents filed the suit for injunction to restrain petitioner from collecting revised fee. Learned Munsiff granted an order of injunction which petitioner has challenged in C.M.A.No.93 of 2011 of the District Court, Thrissur. 3. Learned Senior Advocate submits that since the revision (of fee) was made during the academic year the order of injunction is causing much inconvenience to the petitioner and in the circumstances, an early disposal of the appeal is necessary. Having regard to the grievance of petitioner learned District Judge, Thrissur (or the Additional District Judges hearing the C.M.Appeal as the case may be) is directed to dispose of C.M.A.No.93 of 2011 as early as possible if preliminary steps in the appeal are over, having regard to the grievance of petitioner. THOMAS P.JOSEPH, Judge. cks