IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34105 of 2010 PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH @ PANKAJ KUMAR ………….Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUTH .C.B.I. ----------- 3 01.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is one of the proprietor of the firms, who have supplied articles for installation of pumping sets, boring sets and diesel engines. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that wife of Branch Manager was sent commission through draft but petitioner is not among those who really paid any money. While the submission of the learned counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation is that most of the petitioners loanees were fake, either had not received any loan or no tubewell was installed otherwise also illegal gratification in the whole episode has appeared confirmed in investigation also. Most of the co-accused has 2 been refused anticipatory bail. Considering the allegation petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. The petitioner has optioned to surrender and pray for regular bail, which shall be decided on its own merits. Bhardwaj ( Mandhata Singh, J.)