IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.708 of 2008 RADHEY SHYAM PANDEY ..PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHEOPARSAN PANDEY 3. ARUN PANDEY @ CHCHATHU PANDEY …OPPOSITE PARTES ----------- 03. 07.10. 2010 Present is an application preferred by the informant questioning the sustainability of the order dated 27.06.2008, passed on Cr. Appeal No.02/2007/32/2008, whereby the learned lower appellate court on a consideration of materials on record came to the conclusion that the evidence of the witnesses were at variance. There is sharp contradiction between the oral evidence and the evidence of the doctor. Learned lower appellate court has assigned reasons for acquitting the appellants-accuseds in paragraphs 8 and 9 of the judgment. This Court does not find any patent illegality in consideration of the matter by the court below meriting interference. The application lacks merit which is accordingly dismissed. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )