IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 7802 of 1999 Between: V.Aruna w/o Chandra Sekhar Government Junior college Samalkot, East Godavari Dist ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Secretary, Education Department, The Govt of AP Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Regional Joint Director of Higher Education , Rajahundry, East Godavari District 3 The Director of Intermediate Educations Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad 4 The Principal , Govt .Junior college Samalkot, East Godavari Dist 5 D.V.Raghava Reddy School Assistant, Z.P.High School, Gollamamidada, East Godavari District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, or direction or order more particularly one inthe nature of Writ of Certiorari calling the records in OA.No. 1679/1999 on the ﬁle of the Honourable Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and quash the proceedigns in Rc.No. 92/A2/99 dt. 17/03/1999 of respondent No. 2 by holding that is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional consequetly direct the respodent to regularised the service of petitioner in the respondent No. 4 college form the date of her initial appointment and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.V.SUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH Writ Petition No.7802 of 1999 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ petition is ﬁled seeking to quash the proceedings in Rc.No.92/A2/99, dated 17-03-1999, issued by the second respondent and to direct the oﬃcial respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner in the fourth respondent college. 2. The main grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the Tribunal has not passed any interim order, pending disposal of the O.A. This Court while admitting the writ petition on 17-6-1999, passed the following interim order: “ There shall be interim direction to continue the petitioner in service as part-time Lecturer, until further orders. Notice.” 3. It is represented that the O.A. is stated to be pending. In the circumstances, we are not inclined to express any opinion on the merits of the case inasmuch the matter is already seized by the Tribunal and there is no ﬁnal adjudication of O.A. on merits. Hence, the Tribunal is directed to dispose of O.A. on merits and in accordance with law, if not already done, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Till such time, the interim direction granted by this Court vide its order dated 17- 06-1999 shall continue, provided O.A. is still pending. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. ___________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J. ________________________ G.CHANDRAIAH, J. 11-09-2008 Bsc