1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO.1704 OF 2006 Mrs. Hufriz Navil Patel ..Petitioner. Vs. Regional Transport Authority & Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr. M.B. Kotak for the Petitioner. Mr. S.K. Nair, Panel Counsel for the State. .... CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 6th August, 2007. P.C. : In this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the Petitioner prays that Respondent No.1 be directed to register vehicles at correct address as per Central Motor Vehicles Rules. Counsel appearing for the State at the very outset submitted that they are registering the vehicles at correct address and in correct names. He further submitted that all precaution shall be taken that the Central Motor Vehicle Rules in that regard are strictly complied with. 2 Counsel appearing for the Petitioner for demonstrating that there are violation of rules annexed to the Petition an order passed by R. T. O. on 31st March, 2005 in respect of vehicle bearing Registration No. MH-03-C-8390. The information was furnished as Exh. A-1 to the Writ Petition that the vehicle was registered in the name of Vikas Eknath Khachane, residing at 57/A, Kamgar Nagar, Kurla (East), Mumbai. Counsel appearing for the Respondent had produced a copy of the electricity bill as well as ration card which shows that the person is residing at the address. Thus, the averments made in the Writ Petition are not factually correct. However, in view of the stand taken by the Respondent, no further directions are called for. The Writ Petition is disposed of leaving the parties to bear their own costs. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.