IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14061 of 2004 National Aluminium Company Limited through its General Manager of Captice Power Plant Division and Smeltter Division, Captive Power Plant P.O. Angul District Angul Orissa, through its General Manager. ……Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Bank o India Gaya Branch Gaya through its Manager D.B.D. Gaya. 2. Regional Manager State Bank of India, Gaya. 3. M/s Kalinga Consultancy and Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. through Rakesh Shrivastava Director having its registered office of Angul Puri Colony P.O. & P.S. Gaya, District Gaya. ……Respondents. ----------- 16. 31.03.2011 I.A. No.6347 of 2007 has been filed by the petitioner for amending relief no.1 (a) of paragraph 1 of the writ petition. Considering the facts and circumstances, the said interlocutory application is allowed. Let relief no.1 (a) of the writ petition be substituted with the relief claimed in paragraph 1(a) of the writ petition. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents-Bank. 3. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for directing the respondents-Bank to revoke two Bank guarantees and to make unconditional payment on demand without any delay to the petitioner and to act within its jurisdiction and the terms and conditions of the bank guarantee and also to comply the orders of this court and for other ancillary reliefs. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents contests the claim of the petitioner and submits that the impugned action of the bank authorities is quite legal and justified and during the - 2 - pendency of this writ petition, the amount of bank guarantees has been paid to the petitioner pursuant to the order of this court. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments raised by learned counsel for the parties and the materials on record, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Gaya (respondent no.2). If such an application is filed by the petitioner before the said authority within one month from today along with a copy of this order, the said authority will consider the grievance of the petitioner and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months thereafter and if any amount is found payable to the petitioner, it must be paid immediately thereafter. However, if any amount or interest thereon is not found payable, the said authority shall decide the same by a speaking order within the same time against which, the petitioner, if so likes, may move before the appropriate forum. Sunil (S. N. Hussain, J.)