IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 244 of 2007 (S/B) Geeta Chaudhary W/o Sri Narendra Dutta, R/o District Hospital Campus, Pauri Garhwal. ………. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand, through Secretary, Medical Health and Family Welfare, Dehradun. 2. Director, Medical Health and Family Welfare, Dehradun. 3. Chief Medical Superintendent, Pauri, District Pauri Garhwal. 4. State Advisory Through Principal Secretary, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. 5. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances & Pension, New Delhi. 6. State of Uttar Pradesh through Secretary, Medical Health and Family Welfare. 7. Director General, Medical Health and Family Welfare, U.P. Lucknow. ……… Respondents None for the petitioner. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Brief Holder for respondents Nos. 1 to 3. Ms. Beena Pandey, Standing Counsel (U.P. Govt.) for respondents Nos. 4, 6 & 7. Mr. Arvind Vashishth, Assistant Solicitor General for respondent No. 5. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Petitioner’s counsel absent. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Brief Holder for respondents Nos. 1 to 3. Ms. Beena Pandey, Standing Counsel (U.P. Govt.) for respondents Nos. 4, 6 & 7. Mr. Arvind Vashishth, Assistant Solicitor General for respondent No. 5. 2. As there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 27.11.2007 27.11.2007 G