v^,,,^ ^IT^T^T'R^W WT37T^T$FRhF T^T ^I^KTI^, ^Til^^<o, [®i<ni<H^< <11*1CTI ff»*1|C|» •W[ 200 51T^7T ^N^T ^utl^, ^V J^W (<icli^^) ^TW^f^T^TT^T Ghl<<I^t<i1l 'RR^ff ^ f^^l ^^K ^? 3TRTH 3TT^T SIN6LE BENCH: HONlBLE JUSTICE DHIREN&RA MISHR^ CONTEMPTl pFnnoNER Smt. Vs RESPONDENTS 1. Mi| abl PFmnON N0.197/2007 Tilmati, W/o Bishahu Sahu, aged about 62 y^ars, R/o Mangala, Tahsil & District Biiasp|ur (CG) |. P.M. Kashyap, S/o N.M. Kashyap, aged |)UT 40 years, Executive; Engineer, Pu^Iic Works bepartment (B&ft) Bilaspur Di^ision, District Bilaspur (C&) 2. Sh|ri Naresh Swami, S/o Unknown, aged ab|?uf-45 years, Sub Divisjonal Officer, Pu^lic Works Department, 5ub Division Nc|.l, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG) 3. Shri Vijay Kumar Bhatpahari, srintending Engineer, P.W<D< Office, In| front of District Court, Bilaspur Di^trict Biloispur (C6), 09.04.2008 Mr. Ashok Soni, jAdvoc^ite for the petitioner. Mr. P.5. Koshy, Advoca|te for the respondent No.i. Mr. Pawan Shrivastava Advoaite for the respondsnt No.2 & 3. Heard. Learned counsel for thl •t+ie order passed by this Co| already been appointed as B respondents submits that in compSiance of iirt in W.P. No.5830/05 the petitioner has ^angmen and she has also been given —FS/197—3/2008 —40,000. XI-HG—78 -3T?^I ^T f^?te ?[S?T 'an^r s^Hi^f .^ ^^ ^i^i<n^, ^tfi^Jl^, "f®idl^^< ^Mdi ^NI^? 'W^ 200 •sn^r TT^T ('i0)?^^) ^^TW ^Tft^ 3TJ^f -z.- ^i^^T 'Hi^Tf -^ -fe^t -^T^K ^^rRww^T con^quential monetary benef Unconditional apology has also r|-s as per documentsofAnnexure R3-1. )een tendered for the deloy in compliance of the order. Learned counsel for tl^e petitioner does not dlspute that the order hois been complied with c(nd the petitioner has been reinstated and she has also received the cons^quential monetary benefit, Taking into consideratio) been complied with and furth^r considering that the respondents have tendered unconditional opolog^ the order, I am of the opinion petition, \\ 1+iat the order passed by this Court hcxs in their reply for delay in complicxnce of tiiat no further action is necessary in this )c Accordingly, the apologf tendered by the respondents is accepted oind the contempt proceedings jnitiated against them is hereby dropped. Sd/- Dhirendra JVIishra Judge