1 Contempt Petition No.326/2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.326 OF 2007 1. Gunwant Shamrao Sakhare, Age major, Occ. Agri. 2. Bhimrao s/o Shamrao Sakhare Age major, Occ. Agri. 3. Vishwanath s/o Shamrao Sakhare, Age major, Occ. Agri. Nos.1 to 3 R/o Pardhewadi, Tq. Ausa, District Latur. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. Subhash s/o Sadashiv Waganna, Age major, Occ. Agri. 2. Pratap s/o Manikrao Waganna Age major, Occ. Agri. Both R/o Kokalgaon, Tq. Nilanga, District Latur. 3. Vithal Hariba Kharate, (died, through L.Rs.) 3/1. Anusayabai w/o Vithal Kharate, Age 55 years, Occ. Household, R/o Killari, Tq. Ausa, District Latur. 3/2. Asha Vithal Kharate, Age 25 years, Occ. Household, R/o as above. 3/3. Usha Vithal Kharate, Age 13 years, minor u/g of his mother, respondent No.3/1 2 Contempt Petition No.326/2007 4. Vithoba Narayan Gaikwad, Age major, Occ. Agri. R/o Killari, Tq. Ausa, District Latur. 5. Babru Arjun Kharate, Age major, Occ. Agri. R/o as above. 6. Moti Arjun Kharate, Age major, Occ. Agri. R/o as above. 7. Appasaheb Dhulaj, Additional Collector, Latur. 8. Sanjay Jadhav, Sub-Divisional Officer, Latur, Taluka and District Latur. 9. The State of Maharashtra, through the Government Pleader, High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri B.N. Patil, Advocate for petitioners Shri M.D. Shinde, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 2 Shri D.R. Kale, A.G.P. for respondent No.9 ..... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATED : 13th June, 2011. ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. This Contempt Petition is filed for alleged disobedience of judgment and decree in Regular Civil Suit No.104/1982, passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ausa, dated 27.3.1989. 3 Contempt Petition No.326/2007 2. Heard the counsel for the respective parties. It is admitted position that, the petitioners have filed revision challenging the order of Additional Collector on 29.11.2007 in Appeal No.2006/ROR/A-58. It is fairly conceded by the parties that, in the said proceedings, the Additional Commissioner has directed to maintain status quo. Since the order of the Additional Collector in appeal is under challenge before the Additional Commissioner, in my opinion, the points raised in this Contempt Petition on merits can be agitated before the Additional Commissioner. Contempt Petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. (S.S. SHINDE, J. )