1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 27 OF 2009 IN APPEAL NO. 24 OF 209 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 44 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO. 4538 OF 1999. Jyoti P. Gandhi. .. Petitioner. (Orig. Appellant) vs. Rohit M. Sanghvi & Ors. .. Respondents. (Orig. Defendants) Jyoti P. Gandhi, Petitioner in person. Mr. Yashodhan Divekar i/by M/s. Divekar & Co. for Respondent No. 1. CORAM : J. N. PATEL & SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATE : 27TH NOVEMBER, 2009 (IN CHAMBER AT 2.35 P.M.) P.C. : 2 We have heard the original petitioner in person. We do not find that there is any substantial error on the face of the record so as to call for interference in our order under review. 2. The petitioner has expressed an apprehension as stated in her prayer clause (d) :- "That in view of order dated 29.3.2005 passed in pending proceedings, the Court's observations and comments vis-a-vis HUF status of flat be reviewed and set aside." We make it clear that we were dealing with the matter only for the limited purpose of deciding the issue of exemption from payment of court fee and observations, if any, about the HUF status of the property in question are not the opinion expressed by this Court on merits but is by way of passing reference on the basis of the property lis which is pending before the learned Single Judge. ( J. N. PATEL, J.) ( SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J.)