IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.4892 of 2004 Decided on : 28.08.2009 Puran Singh & others ... Appellants versus Manjit Singh & others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Anil Bansal, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.Manish K. Singla, Advocate for respondents. 1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) This appeal has been filed against the concurrent judgments of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the appellants for possession of about 8 kanals 2 marlas of land. The appellants has based their suit on the ground that they had purchased the property in dispute from Sulakhan Singh. However, both the Courts below have held that they were not able to prove that the land purchased by them was of Sulakhan Singh. The following questions have been proposed: i) Whether the Rapat Rojnamcha Ex.Dx can be looked into in the absence of any order of competent authority? ii)Whether the appellant/plaintiff are bona fide purchaser for valuable consideration vide registered sale deed dated 24.05.1958? RSA No.4892 of 2004 -2- I find that the proposed questions are pure question of fact. Learned counsel for the appellants has not been able to persuade me that the findings are either based on no evidence or on such misreading of evidence so as to render them so perverse which would justify interference under Section 100 of CPC. Consequently this appeal is dismissed. August 28, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE