IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.3790 of 2011 Date of Decision : March 03, 2011. Rajinder Pal Mehta .....Petitioner versus DAV College, Hoshiarpur Society Regd. & others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.K.S.Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by the enrollment of the private respondent Nos.4 to 46 as members of the General Body of respondent No.1-DAV College Hoshiarpur Society (Regd.), Hoshiarpur. The petitioner's grievance appears to be that these persons have been included as members of the Society by amending the Constitution which is alleged to be contrary to Clause 16 of the said Constitution. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the considered view that the petitioner can very well firstly submit his objections against inclusion of the names of private respondents in the voter list for the purpose of election of respondent No.1-Society. If the petitioner submits such objections within a period of one week, the DAV C.W.P.No .3790 of 2011 2 College Managing Committee is directed to dispose of the same by passing a speaking order explaining the legal basis for inclusion of the private respondents as members of the Society. If the petitioner would still be aggrieved, liberty is granted to him to approach the Civil Court as that is the appropriate forum for effective adjudication of such like grievances. Let the objections of the petitioner be decided before the election of the Society is held. Ordered accordingly. Dasti during the course of day. March 03, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE