IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M- 18885 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.7.2011 Pardeep Singh and another .. Petitioners v. The State of Haryana .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. D. R. Singla, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. ... Rajesh Bindal J. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have already joined investigation and the weapons of offence have also been recovered. X-ray and CT scan reports of the injured have also been received and none of the injury was found to be grievous. Though it is alleged in the FIR that a gandasi was used, but in the medico- legal report, the doctor opined that the injury on the head was with blunt weapon. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Angrej Singh, did not dispute the aforesaid facts. Considering the respective contentions raised by learned counsel for the parties, the interim bail granted to the petitioners on 21.6.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Bindal) Judge 28.7.2011/mk mk