1 323.11-revn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 323 OF 2011 Kalpataru Yarntex Pvt.Ltd. and others. ... Applicants. V/s. The Bombay Dyeing & Mfg.Co.Ltd and another. ... Respondents. V.V.Purwant for the applicants. Vinod Kothari with Smita Lad i/b. Apex Law Partners for respondent No.1. S.S.Pednekar, APP for respondent No.2. CORAM: B.R.GAVAI, J. DATED : 13th July 2011. P.C. : Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2. By this revision application, the applicants challenge the order passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Ballard Pier, Mumbai in Criminal Case No.3817/SS/2008 thereby convicting the applicants for the offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No. 70/2010 thereby dismissing the appeal. 3. The matter has been amicably settled between the parties. The parties have placed consent terms on record duly signed by them and their respective advocates. 2 323.11-revn 4. As per the settlement, an amount of Rs.1,25,000/- has been paid to the respondent No.1- complainant. It is further agreed that the amount deposited by the applicant in the trial Court would be withdrawn by the present applicant. 5. The complainant is personally present in the Court and reiterates the fact of settlement and receipt of amount. 6. In this view of the matter, order of conviction is quashed and set aside. Applicants are acquitted of the charges. Applicant No.2, who is in jail, is directed to be released, if not required in any other case. The bail bond of accused No.3 shall stand discharged. The amount deposited by the applicants in the trial Court is permitted to be withdrawn by the applicants. 7. All the concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (B.R.GAVAI, J.)