1 CR.APL 21/2011 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 7. APPLN/21/2011 ( SUKHDEO LALU RATHOD [Criminal] V/S STATE OF MAH ) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. Joydeep Chatterji, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. K.M.Suryawanshi, APP for State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 1-2-2011 1. Heard. Deceased Raju Sarjerao Hutkar went to the fields of Ram Chavan and others under the garb of hunting and met his fate. The principal role in eliminating said Raju is attributed by the witnesses to Rasu Chavan. Two of the witnesses even named Dyandeo said to have been assaulting the deceased Raju. Haribhau names Sukhdeo, accused/applicant, however, informs, he was standing nearby. Even one witness has said Sukhdeo desired water for Raju but he was prevented by Rasu Chavan. 2. Though in the statement of the co- accused, it is informed that Sukhdeo ( applicant) assisted in tying Raju and throwing him in the well, however, at this stage, for that purpose, further 2 CR.APL 21/2011 custody of the accused/applicant is not warranted. The accused/applicant is in custody from 29h Sept.,2010, chargesheet is filed on 16th Dec.,2010. From the investigation papers nothing incriminating is recovered from him or at his instance. The accused hails from the village – least chances of absconding. ORDER (A) The accused/applicant (Sukhdeo Lalu Rathod) be released on his furnishing P.R. bond and surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rs. Fifteen thousand) to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. He shall attend Partur Police Station on every Sunday between 3 p.m. to 8 p.m. till completion of the trial. The applicant/accused shall not endeavour to influence or tamper the prosecution witnesses. Application allowed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/21-11crapl