1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No.5794 of 2008 In Review Application St.No.15505/2007 In CA No.10632/2006 In RC No.375/2007 SAST No.21011/2006. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ 1. Heard counsel. 2. The application for condonation of delay as well as the application for Review of the order dated 18.4.2007 are simultaneously considered. 3. According to the applicant, the order under Review was not communicated to him early. Due to lack of communication between himself and his advocate, the relevant order could not be known within a reasonable time. His daughter-in-law died accidental death on 5.5.2007 and, therefore, there was delay in filing of the application for Review. He seeks condonation of the delay of 98 days and consideration of the Review Application. 4. Considering the reasons stated in the application and on perusal of the death certificate of deceased Alka, delay in filing Review Application is condoned. C.A. allowed. 5. There is hardly any merit in Review Application inasmuch as delay condonation application of the appellant was rejected after considering the explanation given by him. The delay was of enormous nature (1400 days). This Court noticed that the explanation given by the appellant was dissatisfactory and totally unconvincing. There can not be review of such discretionary order which is rendered on the strength of the attending circumstances. Therefore, the application is dismissed. No costs. (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) Dt.09.12.2009. asp/office/Ca5794.08