[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIC ATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION 2088 OF 2004. CRIMINAL APPLICATION 2088 OF 2004. CRIMINAL APPLICATION 2088 OF 2004. IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 634 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 634 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 634 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant V/s. Nandkishor Narayan Khose @ Nandu Sheth and another ..Respondents. Shri B.R. Patil, P.P.for the State. Shri Girish Kulkarni,A.P.P. for the Respondent No.2 CORAM : S.B. MHASE & CORAM : S.B. MHASE & CORAM : S.B. MHASE & ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 7TH DECEMBER, 2004. DATE : 7TH DECEMBER, 2004. DATE : 7TH DECEMBER, 2004. P.C. . Heard both sides. This is an application for condonation of delay for 124 days as per office objection. The delay has been properly explained. Delay is condoned. The criminal application is disposed of. [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.] [2] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDIC ATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 634 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 634 OF 2004 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 634 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant V/s. Nandkishor Narayan Khose @ Nandu Sheth and another ..Respondents. Shri B.R. Patil, P.P.for the State. Shri Girish Kulkarni,A.P.P. for the Respondent No.2 CORAM : S.B. MHASE & CORAM : S.B. MHASE & CORAM : S.B. MHASE & ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 7TH DECEMBER, 2004. DATE : 7TH DECEMBER, 2004. DATE : 7TH DECEMBER, 2004. P.C. . Mr. Girish Kulkarni has already appeared for respondent No.2. The notice of respondent No.1 served on his mother, is not good service, however, the learned advocate Mr. Indrajeet Joshi appears for the respodnent No.1 in this mater. Matter to proceed. [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.]