(1) ra168-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 168 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3683 OF 2011 Pramod s/o Pralhad Rathod PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. V.D. Hon, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.G. Patil, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. Mr. S.N. Pagare, advocate for the respondent No. 3. Mr. P.V. Mandlik, Senior Counsel instructed by Mr. A.M. Karad, advocate for the respondent No. 4. Mr. D.V. Soman, advocate for the respondent No. 6. Mr. V.D. Sapkal, advocate for the writ petitioner. ..... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 21ST JULY, 2011 ORAL ORDER: 1. This Review Petition has been filed by the original respondent No. 7. In our opinion, no case for review has been made out since the grounds mentioned in the review petition obviously indicate that the review petitioner has challenged the judgement passed in the Writ Petition. In the circumstances, the review petition is dismissed. (2) ra168-11 2. Copy of this order duly authenticated by the Court Shirestedar be supplied to the learned counsel for the parties, at their request. [M.T. JOSHI, J.] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.] npj/ra168-11