,^K^^: ^.^.-?--^^''>" ^.^-^ v^s &^e" ^^ [0-^, l.AS^***' IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHAmSSARH AT BILASPUR WRIT pETrrroN (S) NO. r^&\S /20Q9 Singte PE 11110NER VERSUS RESPON&ENTS 1. ^dv'cca Bilaspur 2. 3. 4. Erenius Tirkey, aged about 42 years, Son of Shri Poulus Tirkey, "Upper Division Teacher", Govt. Higher Secondary School - Saria, Block - Baramkela, Tahsil- Sarangarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) The State of Chhattisgarh, Through- The Secretary, Department of School Education, Secretariate, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director 7 Commissioner, Lok Shikshan Sanchanalaya, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, District - Raigarh (C.G.) The Block Education Officer, Block- Baramkela, District- Raigarh (C.6.) WRIT PFnTION U/A - 226 OF THE CONSm-UTIONLOF WQIA FOR ISSUANCE OF .APPRQPRIATE WRTT :—78 .•"<yv '' '.M' \?i> T^ -^ww^, ®xi|y<is,fs|<ii'y'j,< ..^E.c^..^:^.....^ 3tK?T';iWi' v^ iSG * n%^3,^ SSLfSit QSiP Shri ROOD Naik, counsel Shri Yashwant Singh Dubey, P.L. fbr the State, Grievance of the petitior additional adyance increments him despite the fact that iden' benefit of the same. Counsel for the petition. matters the order has been pi increinents and thereibre at withdraw the oresent petition i resoondent No.l. He further s| to decide the representati< considerine the identicai OFder petitions. Counse! for the State issued. Accordingly, the petiti| petition with Ubertv as aforesaj making such representation a] this Court within 15 days froi] same would be decided by the accordance with law after scj petitioner is entitled to get two intatittin c^f^^HW^ ^ ft^ <Faf^f< ^•stfiman^i Ifor the petitioner. FThakur, Dy. A.G. with Shri Arvind ier is that though he is entitled tbr two . but the same has not been given to ticaily placed persons have l^eeri. ^iven br submits that in number ol' identical Issed sranting nvo additional advance this stage, he may be permitted to ^ith liberty to file representation to the .lipn-uts that a direction may be issued of the petitioner expeditiousiy te passed by this Court in severai writ las no obiection li' such direction is sner is oermitted to withdraw the d. 5n the eyentuality of the petitioner's ong with copy of the order passed by ~i the date of receipt of this order, the authorities concemed expeditiously, in •utiniang the fact as to whether the additionai advance increments or not. Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar / Judge