:1: bgp bgp bgp IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2677 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.2677 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.2677 OF 2007 IN IN IN WEALTH WEALTH WEALTH TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1385 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1385 OF 2007 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1385 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Wealth Tax ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Capable Commercials Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 10TH APRIL, 2008 : 10TH APRIL, 2008 : 10TH APRIL, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 683 days delay caused in filing the above Appeal. Perused the Notice of Motion and Affidavit in support thereof. It appears that the final approval for filing the Appeal was granted on 6th July,2005 and the file was sent for drafting the Memo of Appeal on 10th October,2006 and on 22nd June,2007, the Appeal was filed i.e. after a gross delay of 683 days. The only reasons given for the said delay is due to delay in drafting Memo of Appeal and administrative difficulties. We are not at all satisfied with the reasons given. No sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. Hence, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed. :2: 2. In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)