IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.42361 OF 2009 ASHOK SHAHI @ ASHOK KUMAR, SON OF RAM PRAVESH SINGH, RESIDENT OF GANGA VIHAR COLONY, TEKARI ROAD, PATHER KI MASJID, POLICE STATION SULTANGANJ, DISTRICT PATNA VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SONU KUMAR, SON OF FANINDRA NATH KAUNDILYA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SABAZPURA, POLICE STATION DULHIN BAZAR, POLICE STATION PITWANS, DISTRICT PATNA. AT PRESENT RESIDING IN THE HOUSE OF NEGENDRA NATH MISHRA, BEHIND PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, BUDHA COLONY, PATNA ……………………………………………………………………..OPPOSITE PARTIES ******** 2 14/12/2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner has filed this application challenging the order dated 02.11.2009, by which the Court below has taken cognizance against the petitioner under Sections 346, 347, 324, 328, 379, 506, 420 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, on the ground that earlier also similar case was filed against the petitioner. The allegations in the First Information Report is that the petitioner is said to have threatened the informant, confined him in a room, forced him to sign on a few papers and asked him to withdraw a case earlier filed under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code. I find that there is no illegality in the impugned order as the Court has only to see whether the case is prima facie true. This application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)