THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Revision Case No.2169 of 2010 (Dated : 23-11-2010) Between: K.Ravinder Reddy S/o Ram Reddy R/o Borancha (v), Manoor Mandal, Medak District. ….Petitioner/ Accused A n d State of A.P., rep. by Through the Pubic Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad ….Respondent/ Complainant THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Revision Case No.2169 of 2010 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order dated 5.10.2010 passed in Crl.M.P.No.290 of 2010 in S.C.No.140 of 2008 on the file of Special Judge for trial of offences under SC/ST (POA) Act- cum- V Additional District & Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy. 2. The petitioner herein is an accused in S.C.No.140 of 2008. He is facing trial for the offences under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC. He filed Crl.M.P.No.290 of 2010 under Section 311 Cr.P.C to recall Pws.1 to 6 for cross-examination. His application came to be dismissed on 5.10.2010. Hence, this revision. 3. When the revision came up for admission, learned Additional Public Prosecutor received notice on behalf of the respondent. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent- State. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner could not cross-examine Pws.1 to 6, since the counsel engaged by the petitioner failed to attend the Court due to ill-health. 6. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor supported the order impugned in the revision. 7. The petitioner is facing trial for a charge under Section 302 IPC, which is punishable with capital punishment. It is stated that the petitioner could not cross-examine Pws.1 to 6 due to ill health of the counsel engaged by him. 8. Having considered the facts and circumstances, I am inclined to allow the revision at the admission stage subject to the petitioner paying T.A & D.A to Pws.1 to 6. The petitioner has to deposit necessary amount before the trial Court within a week. On such deposit, the trial Court has to permit the petitioner to cross- examine Pws.1 to 6. In the event of the petitioner failing to deposit the amount within a week, the order impugned in the revision shall stand confirmed. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDDY, J Dt.23-11-2010 RAR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Revision Case No.2169 of 2010 (Dated : 23-11-2010)