!la^^ C^]y3-^ -/^/^- ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P. (S) No, 7^M_/2007 PETITIONER ^/ ^\.--i<;-u^y--'' ^•••H-^^ lo.< /^y' ^y ^<<>- ^--Yogendra Nath Pandey S/o Shri Vikramaditya Pandey, Aged about 39 years, Assistant Teacher, Khandelwal Colony, Kaurinbhata, Distt. - Rajanandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS State Govt. of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2^. Director Lok Shikshan, Raipur (C.G.) /3: District Education Officer Rajnandgaon (C.G.) / WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE *u <^'"~° o'"/ •^^ G' CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 TS5T '^WW^, ®Tfl'M'16,(sldl+iy . L-JT'P.^J^'.t?'.'7.2'8.. W^V\\ sh^lch ••-•-••'••-••''•••••••••" ^- 2007 Sii^i iacn ('yil^'5'^) sn^rsBTlN^ cI!IT3IR5Tsbt(lti iablu '? ^ ^ y 5THRR trfN'Sn^T ,2,; AAr. Ajay Shrivastavc., Adv Mr. Arvind &ubey, VVith the consent of !eai >arties, the matters are heard f Commor! order dictated i open LourT, passed sepcrately A copy of this order i^ connected writ Detitions. *i<ifatTI-f 4i*iciT?'tecA'<.Ri<-^i< ^srf^R'sn^r ocate tor the petitionen Pane! iawyer for the •ned counse! appearinq for the of. -. W.P. (s) No. 756 of 2007 iri e placed on recor-d in other Sd/- SatishK.^ Judge P.T.O. HZ6H COURT OF CHHATnSSARH AT BIL^SPUR W. P.fS) No. 7%6of 2007 Petitioner Respondents ShankarLal 5oni Versus : ' .' • State Sovernment of Chhattisgarh and others: ' ': :. ; : ^; :. :: ' • ; •! :. ,':';1; W. P.fS) No. 757 of 2007 Petitioner : Praveen KumarSharma Versus . , .:, 1,::',',.: ,'1,. :. . . Respondents : State Govt.of Chhattisgarh and Olhers'' '::''1'":: •'''". '' : : :''' P.(S)No.758of2W)7 Yogendra Nath Pandey Petition&r ; Versus Respondents ; StateSovt. of Chhcttisgarh and others And P.fS)No. 760 of 2007 Petitioner Respondents Versus Sanjay Kumor Upadhyay 5tate $oyt. of Chhattfsgarh <uid otlters' : SB: Hon'bte Mr. JusticeSatish K. Agnihotri. J Present; Mr. Ajay Shriyastava, /^dvocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel lawyer, for the respondents/State. OR & E ft (Passed on this 8th dayofFebruaiy, 2007) 1. Learned counsel appearing fprlttepetitionersasweilasforthe State/respondents jointiy submit that the facts of the present writ petitions are similar to that of in W. P. Np. 499 of 20Q5 (Rajeshwar ^ao Kridat vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others) and W.P. (s) No. 6676/2006 (Ramchhabile Y<idw vs. Stats of Chhattisgarh Bablu and others),which were disposedofvideordersdated 9.10.2006 and 6.12.2006. They further submit that the question of iaw invoived is also the same. 2. In view of T+ie above-statedsubmissions made by learned counse! for the parties, these wr'itpetitionsaredisposedofin terms pf the orders dated 9.10.2006 and 6.12.2006 passed by this Cow-tm W. P. No. 499 of 2005and W.P. (s) No;6676/20Q6. Noorder as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record in other connected writ petitions. . • :'.! : 1 • '. '_^^—_-- Sd/- Sarishk.Agnihoti Judge