•^FT^^^ XI-HC-78 *n^^llShH|tb ^sf •^wi<fii,w<S\w\6, Rdiuy __ Vv'.f' 4(<J15J/(5^ Wi; 200 3<l^l|4^*(lc|^q^iT) an^rwi^ira; aw sn^TT gniRi t,' ^' %^' CTTOKHfeTsn^ aor Division Bench: Hon'ble Shri S.R. Nayak, CJ & Hon'ble Shri D.R. Deshmykhjl 2&fi&3jro6: W.P.Nos. 4001 of 2008,4002 of 2006 and..400eof 2006. for respondents No. 1 & 2. |Shri Jitendra Pali, leamed counsel for Shri Roop Naik, teamed coi|nsel for the petitioners Shri Ayaz Naved, tearned c^iunsel Shri Prateek Sharma and respondent No.3. Heard. Common order passed sep^r Sd/- Chief JusUce *l<ltd41-< *<|t|d1'ifte<^><l»t«l< ^STl^irafl^r rately, signed and cfated. Sdf- OitipRaosafebDeshmukh Judge P.T.O. HON'BLE SHRi S.R. HON'BLE SHRI D.R. J. WRJT PETjTION N0. 4001 OF 2000 Nav Bharat Steels, A Proprietorship fi i^i^(^>/*«<^^ it^ nn/isf^i t?'s/»friiFBf^.Ki '^»^/s nrm, engagscs !n manutactunng ana sale of Hand pumps and spare parts, having works at Kondatarai, Raigarh, Represented through proprietor Smt. Kallash Gupta, W/o Shri H.S. Gupta, Aged about 65 years, R/o A-123, Inderpuri, New Delhl-12. Versus 1. Chhattisgarh State Industriai Development Corporation Limited; A Government of Chhattisgarh Undertaking. A company registered and incorporated under Ina'lan Companies Act, 1956, Represented through the Managing Director, Ground Ftoor, L.I.C. Commercial Complex, Pandri, Raipur. 2. C-hief Genera! Manager, Chhattisgarh State Industriai Development Corporation Limited, L.i.C. Commerdal Complex, Ground Floor, Pandri, Raipur. 3. M/s. Arihant Industries, Represented throisgh the Proprietor; Partner, 3Q- C/30-D Sector-A, Area, Biiaspur. Sirgitti industrial WRIT PETITION N0.4002 OF 2006. Chhattisgarh Aqua (Private) Lirhited A company registered and incorporated under Indian Companies Act, 1956 havin£ registered office at Shed No.5; AKVN Sheds, Siltara Industriai Area, Raipur, represented through Authorized Signatory - Akshai Chauhan, S/o Shri P.R. C-hauhan, Aged about 28 years, !/17 R. Ravi - 2- Shankar Shukla Universlty Campus, 1. Chhaitisgarh State industria! Development Corporation Lims'ted; A Government csf Chhattisgarh Undertaking. A company registered and incorporated under fndian Companies AcS, 1956, Rspresentsd through the Managing Director, Ground Floor, L.I.C. Commercial Complex, Pandri, Raipur. 2. Chief General Mariager, Chhattisgarh Sfate industriai Development Corporation Limited, L.f.C. Commerciai Complex, Ground Floor, Pandri, Raipur. 3. !VI/s. Arihant industries, Represented through the Proprietor/ Partner, 30- C/30-D Sector-A, Sirgitti Industrial Silaspur. PET!T! PETST! Chaudhari Eiectronic & Company. A Proprietorship firm, engaged in manufacturing and saie of Hand pumps and spare parts, having office at Shiv Talkies Square, Biiaspur, Represented through Power of Attomey Holder Shri Rahut Jain, S/o. Shri Subhas Chandra Jain, Aged about 26 years, R/o Shiv Taikies Square, BHaspur (C.G.) Versus Chhattisgarh State Industriai Devdopment Corporation Limited; A Government of Chhattisgarh Undertaking. A companyregistered and incorporated under indian Companies Act, 1956, Represented through the Managing Director, Ground Fioor, L.i.C. Commereiai Comptex, Pandri, Raipur. Chief General Manager, Chhattisgarh State indust.-.'ai -:"> S3anaB ^Y Deveiopment Corporation Limited, L.i.C. Commercial Compiex, Ground Fioor, Pandri, Raipur. 3. M/s. Arihant Industries, Represented through the Proprietor/ Partner, 30- C/30-D Sector-A, Sirgitti Industrial Area, Bilaspur. Present: Shri Roop Naik, learned counsel for petitioners. Shri Ayaz Naved, learned counse! for respondents No. 1 &2. Shri Prateek Sharma and Shri Jitendra Pali, learned counsei for respondent No. 3. (Passed on 22"°August, 2S he foilowing oral order of the Court was passed by k,CJ. Shri Prateek Sharma, learned counsei appearing for the contesting private respondent would submit that these writ petitions have become infructuous in the sense that subsequent to fiiing of the writ petitions, on 27-07-2006 itself, the impugned eontracts which were awarded to the contesting private respondent had been withdrawn. The iearned counsel for the petitioners did not contest the correctness ofthe above submission of Shri Prateek Sharma. (2) !n that view of the matter, reviewing the correctness or iegality of the impugned contracts would not arise. The writ petitions are, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd;- Dilip Ra'osahiib Deshmukh Judse ^'