IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7861 of 2010 1. ASHA GUPTA W/O PROF. RAMJEE PRASAD AT & P.O. BARIANI, P.S. BANGAON, DISTT.- SAHARSA, POST- LAB INCHARGE, DEPTT. OF HOME SCIENCE, S.N.S.R.K.S. COLLEGE, SAHARSA 2. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH S/O SRI TRIPTO NARAIN SINGH AT & P.O. RAHUA SANGRAM, P.S. BHEJA, DISTT.- MADHUBANI, POST- LAB INCHARGE, DEPTT. OF PHYSICS, S.N.S.R.K.S. COLLEGE, SAHARSA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT BUILDING, PATNA 3. THE VICE CHANCELLOR B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, LALOO NAGAR, MADHEPURA 4. THE REGISTRAR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY LALOO NAGAR, MADHEPURA 5. THE FINANCE OFFICER, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY LALOO NAGAR, MADHEPURA 6. THE PRINCIPAL S.N.S.R.K.S. COLLEGE, SAHARSA ----------- 2 27/01/2011 Issuance of show causes to the two petitioners, one of which has been annexed as annexure-5 to the writ application, became the immediate reason for filing the present writ application. Though the show cause of petitioner no. 1 is not on record but it is evident from perusal of annexures 6 & 6/1 that they have already filed a detailed reply to the show cause addressed to the Registrar, B. N. Mandal University. This show cause is dated 18.06.2009 but since then no final decision has been taken by the University authority. Now - 2 - even salary of these petitioners have been stopped and their status has been put in jeopardy when there is evidence to show that after recommendation of Justice Agrawal, they were appointed and adjusted by the University as Laboratory Incharge Home Science and Physics as would be evident from annexures 4 & 4/1. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim of these petitioners, this writ application is disposed of with a direction upon the Vice Chancellor of the University concerned to take cognizance of the show cause of the petitioners contained in annexures 6 & 6/1 and pass appropriate order which shall be a speaking one within a reasonable time frame of three months from the date of production or communication of a copy of this order. If the order so passed does not satisfy the petitioners, they have remedy under the law. This writ application stands disposed of with the direction aforesaid. AMIN/ (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)