E’Q $1 5' ‘ w 1 ¥ ”@g E XI—HC—22 3a WLW, W Leanlsd counsel for e pefitioner submits that in Appeal No. l-A/ 89/ 2001—20 2 stay application ,‘has Eeen rCjectcd by the Additibnal Hector, Rajnandgaon, and the appeal was admitted and it w s fixed for 1ina1 heaxmg and the same has not yet been decid d. He relied on 2002 (II) MPJR CG 61 (Smt. Ranibai v5, Stat of CG and others) Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and mateiial on iecord, ' the opinion of this COLut, ends 01" justice will senie if IV direction is given to the ~ respondent/Additional Collec r to decide the Appeal Within a period of two months fmm the production of the copy of this order before it. With the afolesaid observations, this petition is disposed of with liberty to tile afresh in case such an eventuality arises. Consequently, M.w.PVN;o.1140/2002 for interim relief 1 . and I.A.No. 6726/ 2002 for urgent hearing also stand disposed of. Certiiied copy as per rul made H ‘ . wwoum D602 WW . g3 200 ma mm ‘ gjg$ mmmm \ 7 WW‘ m r$mqnm “wm “ 28j04l2003 Shri Awadh Txipathi, cc unsel for the petitioner. Shri P.S. Koshv, GA for thc ms ondcuts 110. V P 1 to 5/Stats. Heard.