HIQH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition (st No. 2824 of2Q07 Petitioners <~a <s?' 1) Jawahar Lal Sahu, Aged about47 years, Slo. Shri Kashiram Sahu, Assistant Teacher, Primary Scho61,Kiigoli. 2) Chamru Ram Sahu, aged about 37 years, S/p. Shri Richhwa Ram Sahu; Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Telawat. 3) Rajendra Kumar Jain, Aged about 43 years, S./o; Shri Lakhan Lai Jain, Assistant Teacher, Primary- School, Rode. 4) Shrayan Kumar Sharma, aged aboyt 48 years, S/o. Shri Govind Lal Sharma, Assistant Teacher, PrimarySchool Bhattipara, Deori. Ai! are at Block Kanker, Dist. Kanker.CG. Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh," through Secrstary, Schooi Educatioh Department, D.K.S; Bhawan, Raipur.CG. 2) The Director, Public Insfructipn Departrrsent, Raipur, CG 3) DistrictEducationOfficer.Kanker District Kanker.CG. 4) Block Education Officer, Kanker, CG. ;• : : ' 5) TreasuFy & Funds Department, Kanker,CG (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitytion of India). (SB: Hon'ble Shri •JusticeSatish K. Agnihotri) PRESENT: —-—^ Shri D.K. Prajapati, counsel for the petitioners. Ku.SunteJain,Pane|LawyerfortheStete. Respondents II c Raju ORAL ORDER {PassedQn1stMay2007} The question of law involved herein as to whether the petitioners are entitled toregular pay scate with effect from the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Writ Petition(3) No. 5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh &others), which was ailowed vide order dated 7-11 -2006. In view of the above stated submission made by learned counsel.for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. I Satish K. Agnihotri | : Judge ig;^^;HT..!^.|k^i. ^^S^i^^^^^ ...^^-/_..:. •'.^^^^^KSa^ssSs^'^wS^s'ssss^SssKs^s