1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1541 of 2010 ( Sau. Anjali S. Chawhan -: versus :- Addl. Commissioner, Amravati and others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : APRIL 6, 2010. 1. Heard Shri Band, learned Advocate holding for Shri S.D. Chopde, learned Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. C.N. Adgokar, learned AGP for the respondents 1 to 3. 2. The contention of petitioner is that there was no discussion about no confidence motion and as petitioner was prohibited to speak in the meeting, the ground of misconduct could not be refuted and hence, the proceedings of said meeting dated 26-8-2009 stand vitiated. The contention though raised has not been considered either by the Additional Collector or then by the Additional Commissioner. 3. The learned AGP relies upon impugned orders and states that the contention is without any merit. 4. Perusal of proceedings show that the petitioner was present in the meeting and there was detailed 2 discussion. After detailed discussion, the petitioner submitted an application in writing for secret ballet and accordingly the voting was conducted. In the situation, I do not find any merit in the contentions. Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. JUDGE adgokar