THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 21747 of 2004 Date: 13.7.2010 Between: M/s. Namdhari Seeds ..... PETITIONERS AND The Government of A.P. rep. by the Commissioner & Director of Agriculture, Hyderabad and others. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri M. Venkata Ramana Reddy Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: A.G.P. for Agriculture Counsel for Respondent No.4: Mr. N. Subba Rao The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 21747 of 2004 Order: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “To issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the order of the 3rd respondent dated 3.3.2004 as made in Roc. No. E7/493/2004 as confirmed by the 2nd respondent in Proceedings No. S&HVP(1) 573/Appeals/2003, dated 14.10.2004 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India besides against the terms and conditions of the MOU and the instructions issued by the 1st respondent from time to time and consequently set aside the same and grant such other relief as it deems fit in the circumstances of the case.” At the hearing, Sri Venkata Ramana Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in pursuance of the impugned order, the petitioner has paid the amount of compensation determined by the impugned order to respondent No.4. In view of the same, the learned counsel conceded that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of main petition, WPMP Nos.28500 of 2004, 31034 of 2004 and W.V.M.P. No. 1437 of 2005 are dismissed as infructuous. __________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY,J DATE: 13th July, 2010 pnb