IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17030 of 2011 Bal Manohar Jalan Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 03. 18.10.2011. Heard the learned senior counsel, Mr. Abhaya Kumar Singh, appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned cousin, Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, appearing on behalf of the respondent No.3 and Mr. Kundan Bahadur Singh, appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the injunction application filed by the petitioner on 27.05.2011 and supplementary affidavit dated 24.06.2011 is not being disposed by the Court below in spite of lapse of more than 4 months. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Court below should be directed to dispose of the application within any specified period. From perusal of the writ application, it appears that there is no statement regarding the fact that on which date the said application was pressed but the learned Court below refused to pass any order. Only statement has been made on such and such date the applications have been filed 2 which are still pending. Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, this Court has no jurisdiction to fix particular period for disposal particular matter in the case, particularly when as has been admitted by the respondents that there are so many applications pending before the Court below. It is also well settled principle of law that justice delayed in some cases may amount to justice denied and it is also settled principle of law that justice hurried may in some case amount to justice buried. So, no such time frame can be given in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction. However, the petitioner, if pressed his application before the Court below, the Court below shall try to dispose of the same as soon as possible. With this observation, this writ application is disposed of. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)