In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No.M-35545 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 3.12.2010 Raj Kumar Gupta and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Hari Om Atri, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** SABINA, J. This petition has been filed under Section 439 (2) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for cancellation of regular bail granted by the trial Court vide order dated 25.9.2010 to respondents No.5 to 8 in case FIR No. 880 dated 23.10.2008, under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Sadar Hisar. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that no ground for cancellation of bail granted to the private respondents is made out. Learned Magistrate, while allowing the bail to the private respondents, has held as under:- “In view of the submissions by the learned counsel on behalf of the accused, Investigating Officer Criminal Misc. No.M-35545 of 2010 (O&M) -2- along with learned counsel on behalf of the complainant as well as on perusal of the document on file, the citation cited by the learned counsel on behalf of the accused, the order passed by the learned District and Sessions judge, Hisar, I find that the above named accused are on anticipatory bail. I am convicted with the arguments advanced by the learned counsel on behalf of the accused that the documents on file do not prima facie reveal that the above named accused have committed the offence under Section 420 IPC. On perusal of the documents on file, it seems that it is a dispute of civil nature. There is nothing on file to show prima facie that any mis-representation was made by the accused to the complainant.” The reasons given by the trial Court while allowing bail to the private respondents are good reasons. A perusal of the FIR (Annexure P-3) leads to the inference that the dispute between the parties is qua payment of money. Hence, no ground for interference by this Court is made out. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. (SABINA) JUDGE December 03, 2010