IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34140 of 2010 MAHESH CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04. 28.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that petitioner has been made accused in the case due to his being brother of Suresh Chaudhary to whom allegedly deceased had gone to demand remaining amount of his land for which he had executed a sale deed. Interest of both the brothers is separate as the sale deed is standing in name of his brother only. So, extending the liability to administer poison in wine refusal of anticipatory bail is not justified. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Dhanouti O.P. Siwan, Muffasil P. S. Case No.97 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)