... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7601 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7601 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7601 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.997 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.997 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.997 OF 2005 Sudhanwa Sadashiv Talavdekar ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Shri K.S. Patil for the Applicant. Shri A.S. Shitole, A.P.P for the State. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 04, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 04, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 04, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate appearing for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P for the State. Prayer in this Application is for grant of stay of operation of clause No.5 of the impugned order dated 20th September, 2005. Clause No.5 reads thus: "5. The property that is bank balance, fixed deposits, etc equivalent to the disproportionate assets, as found above, i.e. Rs.3,61,483/-, be confiscated to State, after the appeal period is over". ... 2 ... 2. Apart from the fact that the order has taken effect immediately after the Appeal period was over, in case the Applicant succeeds in Appeal he can always get back the amount. Hence, no case is made out for grant of interim relief. Application is rejected. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE