^^fewL^ IN HE HIGH COUR OF JUDICAURE . AT BILASFUR , CHHATTISGAmi W.P.No^cv<t° /200€ PE^TITIONER:-_ Sameer Kumar Nag S/o Late B.L.Nag aged 53 years Occupation Service presently ...'•'s^ .-^Cl:~' s~Dirtt- ^F '..N^ ...••"c:^^^' -••-'^<^--" ^^.. ' ^'.^--" Raigarh (C.G) VERSUS ^ESPONDENTS:-l.State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaiy, ^" Department of Revenue Mantralay , D.K.S Bhavan, Raipur (C.G) ^.- 2.Under Secretaiy, Department of Revenue, State of Chhattisgarh, Mantralay , D.K.S. Bhavan Raipur (C.G) S.CoUector Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G) -3 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF TSSDIA c?',^ ^- ' HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASnjR W.P. No. 4090 of 2006 Pefittoner Samer Kumar Nag Vereus Responctente State of ChhatUsgarh & otfiere SB: Hon'bls Mr. Justics Satish K. ^nihote-i, J Shri S. N. Nande, Advocate for the petftioner. V. V. S. Murtfiy, Cteputy Advocate Generat wifli Smt Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govt. Advocate for fce respondents/State. Shri A. N. Bhakta, Advocate for tfre Intervener. ORDER ( Passed on ftfe 9fl1 day <rf Mardi, 2(»7) The followng order of 8ie Court is passed by Satish K. AgnBioftl, J. 1. Ths pefittoner while working as Tehsildar, Sarangarh, rastrict- Raigarh was tran^erred to Rajgarh and the Intervener was transferred from Rajgarh to Sarangarh vkle impugned order dated 21.8.2006 (Annexure P/1). 2. This Court vide interim order dated 12S20W ^ayed ttie impi^ned transfer order, in respect crf the petifioner. By virtue of ttie interim order the petttioner is working at e original place of posting. 3. Be that as it may, with the {»ssag®of time this p^Won has become infrucfoous as period of transfer is not applfa^bte forevsr. At is point of time thers is no quesfion to examine the validity of the tran^ar ord^. However. fche respondents are at iibetfy to pass appropriate orders iceeplng in view e pubgc interest and admini^rative exigency, wffiout tnsisting on compliance of the impusnecf transfer order. 4. It is well settled princifrfe <rf law that transfer te an inddent of sennce and it fe for the emptoyer to decMe as to where a particular officer/employee be posted, keefung in wew public interest as well as administrative exigency. This Court has limited jurisdicfion to interfere in the transfer matter and thfe Court can interfere only in the case of proved malafide, non-comp^ence of authority passing the transfer order and fran^er order not beir^ in conformity with ttie rules and regulations. 5. In view of the above, this pefitjon stends disposed of. No order as to costs. Thakur Sd/- SatishK.Agmhotn Judge