1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.715 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION ST. NO.54 OF 2010 Syed Istekhar Syed Gani ..Applicant V/s Rubeenabee Syed Istekhar and another. ..Respondents ..... Mr.Z.M. Pathan holding for Mrs.Fatima Kazi, Advocate for applicant. Mr.J.R. Jadhav, Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2. ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE,J DATE : 7th April, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr.Z.M. Pathan, learned counsel holding for Mrs.Fatima Kazi, learned counsel for applicant and Mr.J.R. Jadhav, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2. 2. This is an application preferred by applicant (original respondent) for condonation of delay of 119 days caused in filing of accompanying civil revision 2 application challenging the judgment and order dated 23rd July, 2009 passed by learned Judge Family Court, Aurangabad in Petition No.E.133/2008. 3. Considering the contents in application, it appears that applicant has explained delay satisfactorily and also it appears that the said delay is not willful, deliberate and intentional, and therefore, delay is required to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4. In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause `B' of application and delay of 119 days caused in filing accompanying civil revision application stands condoned. Accompanying civil revision application be registered and numbered. 5. Criminal application no.715/2010 is disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE) JUDGE gas/cri715.10