CRR No.1397 of 2011(O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.1397 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 29.09.2011 Ram Niwas and another ...... Petitioners v. State of Haryana and another ...... Respondents *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Grewal, D.A.G., Punjab. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 17.05.2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby the petitioners have been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. On 01.09.2011 the following contention was noticed:- “Learned counsel has argued that the petitioners have now been ordered to be summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. on an incomplete statement of the complainant and relies upon Mohd. Shafi v. Mohd. Rafiq and another reported as 2007(2) RCR (Crl.) 762. On his oral request, Ramsharan son of Kishan Lal r/o CRR No.1397 of 2011(O&M) ::2:: Mangalpur, P.S. Sadar Karnal, District Karnal, is impleaded as respondent No.2. Registry is directed to make necessary correction in the memo of parties.” Learned Deputy Advocate General has accepted the legal position as enumerated from the judgment cited above. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The impugned judgment dated 17.05.2011 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the learned trial Court. Learned trial Court is directed to pass an appropriate order after the statement of the complainant is complete. ( AJAY TEWARI ) September 29, 2011 JUDGE ashish