IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11199 of 2011 MANOHAR MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 19.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Admittedly, there is case and counter case between the parties and there is allegation against the petitioner that he opened fire causing firearm injury on the elbow of injured Gauri Shankar Prasad. It appears that the learned Sessions judge has observed that the aforesaid Gauri Shankar Prasad has sustained simple injury though said to be caused by firearm. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that elbow is not the vital part of the body and in course of investigation, two versions have come regarding causing injury to the above stated injured Gauri Shankar Prasad which is evident from perusal of impugned order of learned Sessions Judge itself. Learned counsel appearing for the informant opposed the prayer pointing out that petitioner carries criminal antecedent and the alleged occurrence took place on account of demand of extortion money but I am not at all convinced with this submission, because admittedly, petitioner is co-villager of the informant and 2 there was land dispute between the parties. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Manohar Mahto be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Khagaria in connection with Khagaria (Gangaur) P.S. Case No.01 of 2011. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)