1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1674 of 2007. [Pravin Prabhatilal Agrawal and another] Vs. [The Union of India thro the Secretary, Ministry of Defence and others] ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri AS Chandurkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Neeraj Patil Advocate for R-5. Shri R.S. Sunderam Advocate for R-1. Shri NN Motghare Advocate for R-2 Coram: D.D. SINHA AND SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK,JJ. Dated : 11th FEBRUARY 2008. 1. Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the respondents. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that in the instant petition, the petitioner 2 seeks direction to respondentnno.2 to initiate the proceeding under the provisions of Cantonment Act for non removal of un-authorised construction carried out by the respondent no.4. 3. Mr. Motghare learned Counsel for the respondent no.2 has submitted that it is the duty of the competent authority of respondent no.2 to initiate the proceedings against one and all who are involved in carrying out the constructions within the Cantonment Board area, and therefore, if anybody has carried out any construction dehorse of the provisions of the Cantonment Act, appropriate steps should be taken against those persons. 4. In view of the above referred statement made by the 3 learned Counsel for the respondent no.2, there is no occasion to show indulgence in the present matter. 5. Petition, therefore, is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE Sbm