1 cas362-05 ttm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.362 OF 2005 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.578 OF 2001 Deepaklal Jagananth Rathi .. Applicant Vs. Malojirao Sadashiv Mogal .. Respondents Mr.Vipin R. Kasale h/f Mr.R.D.Soni for the applicant CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE: 28TH JANUARY, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. None for the respondent though served. 2. The present Civil Application is preferred by original appellant for bringing on record the name of subsequent purchaser Pramod Malojirao Mogal. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that originally the respondent was shown as owner in 7/12 extract but subsequently the name of Pramod Malojirao Mogal was added as owner. He relies on 7/12 2 cas362-05 extract which is Exhibit A . ‘ ’ 4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and the averments made in Civil Application, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) which reads as under: (a) That the applicant be permitted to amend the cause title of the Second Appeal No.727 of 2001 and join Pramod Malojirao Mogal as party respondent no.2 in the said Appeal. (b) Such further and other reliefs as the nature and circumstances of the case may require be granted to the Applicant. 5. Amendment be carried out within two weeks from today. After amendment, issue notice to newly added respondent no.2, returnable after 12 weeks. 6. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (K.K. TATED, J.)