IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10060 OF 2004 Shri.Ahmed Yunus Hodekar & Ors. ..Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents. ... Mr.Sachin Purekar h/f Mr.H.V.Bhadbhade for the Petitioners. Mr.Rakesh Bhalekar for the Respondents. .... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. 15th April, 2005. P.C. : A plea of tenancy has to be supported by sufficient details in order to sustain a reference to the competent authority under the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act. In the present case, no details of tenancy were forthcoming in support of the plea that was raised. The interference of this Court under Article 227 is not called for. The Petition is accordingly rejected.