CRM-M-14721 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-14721 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 31.05.2011 Mahesh Kumar Saini ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Present petition is filed seeking regular bail in case FIR No.3 dated 6.1.2011 under Sections 324/307/326/323/506/34 IPC and Sections 25/54/59 Arms Act, Police Station Rampura District Rewari. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is the similarly situated accused to Bunnu @ Bunbun, who has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl. Misc. No.13799 of 2011. He has further stated that petitioner was not named in the FIR, however, his name was figured in the alleged disclosure statement of the other accused. He while relying on the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Union of India Vs. Bal Mukund and others, 2009(2) RCR (Crl.) 574 has argued that co-accused cannot be convicted on the basis of disclosure statement of the other co-accused. Learned counsel CRM-M-14721 of 2011 (O&M) -2- has further stated that petitioner is in jail w.e.f. 19.1.2011. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. Let petitioner be released on bail to the satisfaction of learned CJM. (Alok Singh) Judge May 31, 2011 R.S.