In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh C.W.P.No.9458 of 2008 Date of Decision:27-05-2008 Darshan Ram and others ---Petitioners vs. State of Punjab and others ---Respondent Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Ashok Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners M.M.KUMAR, J. This petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution prays for issuance of direction to the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioners and not to dispossess them from their shops situated as Rampura Phul, District Bathinda forcibly and without following due course of law. 2. The controversy has already been settled up to this Court when a Division Bench of this Court had dismissed the petition filed by the respondent-Municipal Committee with the observation that it was open to the Municipal Committee to establish its ownership vesting under the law over the shops in dispute in a civil court. There is nothing on record to show that the petitioner has a cause of action to invoke the writ jurisdiction of this Court. C.W.P.No. 9458 of 2008 -2- 3. The writ petition is wholly vague and is accordingly dismissed. It shall be open to the petitioners to avail any other remedy in accordance with law. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE (SABINA) JUDGE May 27, 2008 paramjit