(•V. S3^*5I ^^^^s -s.rs o-^i rs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BH.ASPUR CHHATTISGARH W. P. (S) No.~VZO^_L2007 PETITIONERS ^<^- ^l^"...--"' .-^w' ^.y -^°>' ^y^ ^l RESPONDENT'S ^ <^?K1^ 4*4 " 1^1 \/^ ^..^' Khilanand Yaduraj, S/o. Late Shri Motilal Yaduraj, Kumar, aged about 47 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. School - Farsiya, Distt. - Dhamtari (C.G.) VERSUS 1.^ State of Chhattisgrh, Through The Secretary Department of Education , D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2, Director Public Instruction, Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur(C.G.) '3. District Education Officer Distt.- Dhamtari(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTJ OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE IVIATTER. ^ Sablu Prsssnt^ H16H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S) No. 707 of 2007 \ Khiicnand yaduraj Versus its : Stats of Chhettisgarh cnd others te •Sf Petitioners tesoondents Versus Paras Ram Sahu and anothei State of Chhisttisqarh cnd others SB; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Setish K. Asnihotri. J AAr. Anil Singh Rajput, Advocate for the petiti AAr. Sushil Dubey, <?ov'ernment Advocate for the raspondents/State. O R & [Passed on •tiiis 7 day of February, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing fo" 1+ie petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the present wrlt petitions are similar to that of In W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushi! Tiwcri and other-s vs. State 5overnment of Chhattisgarh & others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. They further submit that the question of law invotved is also the same. 2. In view of the above-stated submissions mads by iearned counsel for the parties. these writ petitions are atlowed in terms of the ordsr dated 7.11.2006 passed by This Court in W.P. (S.) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwori and others vs. State Sovernment of Chhattls9arh a others). No order as to costs. S. A copy of this order be placed on record in other connected writ petiti Sd/- SatishK.Ag Judge