IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39583 of 2009 RABINDRA PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 16.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is Managing Director, solely responsible for construction of building and its allotment to the rightful owners. His act in itself needs no corroboration from any corner for his accusation disentitling for anticipatory bail as after receiving the maximum agreed amount for complainant’s Flat, dishonour of a simple cheque empowered him to cancel the agreed allotment is conceded by him while it is said that for the same, opportunity was to be given to the allottee but he was forced to approach three forums for his grievance that in title suit, consumer forum and this Court. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)