IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH APRIL 2009 / 25TH CHAITHRA 1931 WP(C).No. 12343 of 2009(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.K.CHATTERJI, THINAYAT HOUSE, POOVATHUSSERY, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. T.T.MAHAMOOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/04/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 12343 OF 2009 () ===================== Dated this the 15th day of April, 2009 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that by Ext.P1, permit was ordered to be granted subject to settlement of timings in respect of the stage carriage bearing registration No.KL01 Y 8447 or a suitable vehicle. It is stated that though timings have been settled by Ext.P3, for the reason that the petitioner did not produce correct records of the vehicle bearing registration No.KL01 Y 8447, the permit has not been issued. According to the petitioner, Ext.P5 judgment rendered by this court covers the issue in his favour. A reading of Ext.P1 judgment shows that, it was open to the petitioner to offer a suitable vehicle in place of the vehicle No. KL01 Y 8447. Therefore, if subsequent to settlement of timings, current records produced pertains to a suitable vehicle, there is no reason why the permit shall not be issued. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing that if the current records of the vehicle produced by the petitioner is a suitable one as provided in Ext.P1, the permit granted by Ext.P1 and in respect of which timings have been settled by Ext.P3, will be issued to the petitioner on the production of a copy of the judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE vi