IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARNCHAL AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 6820 OF 2001(S/S) (Old No. 45832 of 1992) Saroj Kumar Thakur, son of Ram Chandra Thakur, Chaprasi- cum-Driver (Class IV employee), District Cooperative Bank Ltd., Dehradun. ……………..Petitioner. Versus 1. District Cooperative Bank Ltd., Dehradun through its Chairman. 2. Secretary/Maha Prabandhak, District Cooperative Bank Ltd., Dehradun. 3. Registrar Cooperative Societies, U.P., Lucknow. ……………….Respondents. Sri K.S. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned standing counsel. Dated: 11.05.2005 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned termination order dated 30.07.1992 (Annexure 5 to the writ petition) issued by the respondent no.1 as well as mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to work as Driver-cum-Chaprasi (Class- IV employee) in the Bank and to pay salary regularly as and when due. Briefly stated, the petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Driver-cum-Chaprasi in the district Cooperative Bank under the orders of the respondent no. 2 dated 18.11.1989. The said appointment of the petitioner came to an end on 15.02.1990 and by the order dated 08.08.1990, the petitioner was appointed on the same post of Driver-cum-Chaprasi on daily wage of Rs. 25/- per day. In view of the above, liberty is given to the petitioner to make representation with regard to the aforesaid direction as given on 27.11.1993. Apart from that the liberty is given to the petitioner to make a representation in view of the aforesaid interim order dated 13th April, 2004. 2 Since I have already directed that if there is vacant post available and the petitioner is eligible and qualified for the said post, liberty is given to the petitioner to make a representation. Similar directions were given on 27.11.1993 also. In terms of the aforesaid order, the petitioner is permitted to make a fresh representation. If such a representation is made within a period of six weeks, the same shall be disposed of by the respondents within a period of one month thereafter. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of. (Rajesh Tandon, J.) Dated: 11.05.2005 Rathour