1 cr-apln-3624-10 jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLN. NO. 3624 OF 2010 Dr.Ashish Bhaskar Raut ..Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent .... Mr. Sandesh More Adv. i/b Mr.Naveen Chomal Adv. for applicant Mr. J.P.Kharge APP for State .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : AUGUST 27, 2010 P.C.: 1 Not on board. Taken on board. 2 Leave to amend granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Added respondent no.2 who is present in person waives service of notice. 2 The applicant was married to respondent no.2. Thereafter, respondent no.2 lodged FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 read with Section 34 of IPC against the applicant. The applicant has preferred this application for permission to go abroad for his job. 2 cr-apln-3624-10 3 The reason for the applicant to prefer this application is that when the applicant was granted bail by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate by order dated 7.6.2010, the accused had given undertaking that he shall not leave India. In view of the undertaking, bail application came to be granted. 4 The respondent no.2 is present before the Court and states that the parties have entered into consent terms which have been filed before the Family Court and she states that she has no objection to the applicant traveling abroad provided that he comes back on 5.1.2011 to appear before the Family Court. The applicant who is present before this Court, has furnished an undertaking that he will remain present before the Family Court on 5.1.2011. In this view of the matter, permission to go abroad is granted to the applicant. 5 Application is disposed of. [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]