HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. No. 163 of 2002 Petitioners 1 . Smt. Ritu Sao, W/o Basant Madhav Sao, Aged about 26 years, By caste Teli. Rio Shriram Colony, Raigarh (C.G.). Ku. Pocnam Pandey. Dlo Shri Muri§dhar Pandey. Aged about 27 years, R/o Rajapara. Baghtalab. Raigarh (C.G.). Santosh Kumar Mishra, S/o Vishwanath Prasad Mishra. Aged about 31 years, Rfo Ma!idiba, Boirdadar, Raigarh (C.G.). Sanjay Satpathi. Sle Gautam Prasad Satpathi, Aged about 29 years, Rfo Bang!apara. Qhakradhar Nagar, Raigarh (C.G.) Diiip Kumar Patel. S/o Dhowa Patel, Aged about 23 years‘ R/o Panchdhar Saria, Raigarh (C.G.) Ramji Shukia. Slo Chandlashekar Pmsad Shukla. Aged about 24 years, Rio Malidiba, Boirdadar, Raigarh (C.G.) Ku. Sarita Yadav, D/o T.R.Yadav. Aged about 25 years, R/o Chakradhar Nagar, Raigarh (ca). Ku. Anita Mitra, D/o Sukhbhog Mitra, Rio Housing Board Colony, Raigarh (G.G.), Aged about 26 yrs. Ku. ¥ijaya ShrMas, Dlo D.P.Shriwas. Aged about 24 years. R/o Housing Board Co!on‘ . Raigarh (C.G.). Damroodhar Wareth, 5/0 Boondram Wareth, Aged about 23 years, Rio Malidiba, Boirdad'ar, Raigarh (C.G.) Deepak Singh Chouhan, S/o Prakash Chouhan, Aged about 24 years, R/o Malidiba, Boirdadar, Raigarh (C.G.) Ashok Kumar 25 years. R/o Malidiba. Boirdadar. Raigarh (C.G.) state of Chhattisgarh. Through : Secretary, Department of Commerce & industries, D.K.S. Buitding, Raipur (C.G.) The Registrar. Finns & Societies. Raipur. Dist. Raipur (C.G.) I N 11. 12. Versus- Respondents ‘ 1. Vastrakar, S/o .Pennaiai Vastrakar, Aged about ,1. L§ ()A Assismnt RegiStrar, Firms & $ocieties, Raigarh, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) 4. District Education Office, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (0.6.). 5. Pragya Shikshan Samm, Boirdadar. Raigarh, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) The Principai, Pragya Shikshan Samiti. Boirdadar, Raigarh (C.G.) Tehsildar, Raigam, Distt. Raigarh (C-G-) Sub Divisiona! Officer, Raigarh. Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETmGN UNDER ARECLE 226! 22? OF THE CON$TITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'bEe Mr. Justice satish K. Agnihctri Shri $unil Sahu, Advocate for the petitioners. and 8. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Gcvt. Advecate fer the respondents No. 1 to 4, 7 ORDER (Passed on this 25‘“ day cf June, 2007') 1. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners, are working on the post of Teacher in Pragya Shikshan Samiti, Boirdadar, Raigarh. By the order dated 31.12.2001 passed by the Principe! Secretary, State of Chhattisgarh, Commerce and industries Department the old teachers were permitted to work in the Pragya Shikshan Samiti. . i: appears mar a complaint was made to the Sub Divisionai Officer, Raigarh that on account of the order dated 31.12.2001 there was tikeiihood of the iaw and order probiem. in response thereof, the Sub Divisionat Officer vide order dated 1.1.2002 (Annexure P11) directed for maintaining the iaw and order in the institution. / 3. The petitioners have not impugned the order dated 31.12.2001 and as suchthe same has attained ttnatity. 4, In the present petition the ordet dated 1.1 .2002 (Annexure P/1) has been impugned by the petitioner, whereby the Tahsiidar, Raigarh and Station House Omcer, Police $tation, Chakradhar Nagar, Raigarh were directed by the Sub Divisionai Officer, Raigarh, to remain present in the Pragya Shikshan Samiti on 2.1.2002 to maintain the law and order. 5. i failed to understand how the petitioners are aggrieved if the law and order is maintained in the institution. There should not be any grievance, if the school is properly run and law and order is maintained. 6. in View of the foregoing, there is no merit in this petition, which deserves to be and is dismissed accordingly. No order as to costs. Sd/- Thakur Satish K. Agnihotri» Judge