1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2008 Late Jayantibhai Maganlal Jariwala Died, through his L.Rs. and others. ....Applicants. Versus Shri. Ghansham Nathmal Rathi & another ....Respondents. Shri. S.B. Yawalkar, Advocate for the applicants. Shri. M.N. Navandar, Advocate for respondents. CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 5th November, 2009 ORAL ORDER : 1. This civil revision application challenges the judgment and order dated 2nd March 2007 passed by the Principal District Judge, Jalgaon in Regular Civil Appeal No. 39/1996, confirming the judgment and decree passed in Regular Civil Suit No. 538/1987 by the learned 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jalgaon. 2. The Trial Court has decreed the suit and directed the defendants, who are applicants herein, to hand over the vacant and peaceful 2 possession of the suit premises to the plaintiffs within a period of two months from the date of decree. The Trial Court framed the issue regarding bona fide requirement of the suit premises and after considering the evidence on record, it is held that the plaintiff has proved the bona fide requirement. The Appellate Court in Regular Civil Appeal No. 39/1996 filed by the present applicants confirmed the findings recorded by the Trial Court. The Courts below have believed the testimony of P.W. 1 Ghanshyam and P.W. 7 Damodar. The learned counsel for the applicants has urged that the Courts below were wrong in believing the testimony of the witnesses of the plaintiff. 3. In my opinion, it is purely a matter of appreciation of evidence. There is no jurisdictional error committed by the Courts below in recording such findings. Hence, no interference is warranted in exercise of revisional jurisdiction of this Court. The civil revision application is, therefore, dismissed. [ R.K. DESHPANDE, J. ] ssc/cra72.08