IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15470 of 2009 ANIL KUMAR Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 05.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Address of the manufacturer if not appears the product that is the responsibility of the manufacturer and according to the learned counsel, it may be a case of misbranding for which at the moment, petitioner’s arrest in my view is not justified. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Case No. 6(M) 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh,J.)