1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.132 OF 2006 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.885 OF 2005 Bank of India ...Plaintiff. vs. Ramkrishna Narayan Iyer & another. ...Defendants. --- Mr.Jose George, for Plaintiff. None for Defendants. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH,J. DATED: 25th July, 2006. P.C.:- 1. This is a summons for judgment taken out by the plaintiff only against defendant no.2. The defendant no.2 is served with the summons for judgment. Affidavit of service has been filed. The defendant no.2 has not filed any application for leave to defend. Hence, as required by the provisions of Order 37 of the Civil Procedure Code, the plaintiff becomes entitle to a judgment. 2 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for Plaintiff. Perused the record. The summons for judgment is granted. The suit is decreed in terms of prayer clause of the suit only against defendant no.2. The suit against defendant no.1 remains pending. ---