IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30737 of 2009 RAJ KUMAR RAUT Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 16.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that land dispute is there in between the parties, for that only allegations are leveled with super-added allegation of commitment of theft which also is upon co-accused Raj Kumar Raut. For petitioner, it is said that he blew a Grassa on the informant’s head which has been found simple without repetition. Consideration facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in Banka (Panjwara) P.S.Case No. 89/09, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)