IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5220 of 1987 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- ANAND NIKETAN ASHRAM Versus GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JIVANLAL G SHAH for Petitioner MR PRAMAL JOSHI, AGP, for the respondents. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT Date of decision: 23/03/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT When the matter was called out, learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Shah, under instructions, submitted that the petitioner would like to make representation to the concerned authority within a period of two months and till then, the present position may be directed not to be disturbed by the respondent authorities. He has further requested that on representation being made, sympathetic view may be taken by the Government. He has, therefore, sought permission to withdraw the petition, at this stage. Permission to withdraw the petition is granted. On representation being made to the concerned competent authority, within period of two months, the authority will consider it sympathetically, since the issue pertains to the lives of tribal and, more so when we have wedded to welfare State doctrine, and the present position shall not be disturbed for a period of two months from today. The petition shall stand disposed as withdrawn. Rule discharged with no order as to costs. (J.N.Bhatt, J.) (vjn)