^A n ^:; ,1 \<3* IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRITPETmON(S.)NO&M..OF20ll PETITIONER \^^ ^.^•^ ^;fe:<^-;"" ..-^^^>"" ,^;;> w RESPONDEWT8 /^^I ^•^..••y, 4. 6. Mahesh Kumar Sahu, Son of Shri Bhagirathi Sahu, aged about 38 years, R/o. Block Colony, Patwari Office, Dongergaon, District Rajnand- gaon (C.G.), VERSU8 State of Chhattisgarh, Throygh The Secretary, Revenue Departaient, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) Collectpr, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Dongergapn, DistrictRajnandgaon(C.G.), Tahsildar, Dongergaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.0.) , Sundar Lal, Son of Shri Sonu Ram (Kanungo), Tahsil Office, Dongergaon, District Rajnaiidgaon (C.G.), Krishna Kiimar Jaiswal, son of Resham Lal Jaiswal, Patwari, Patwari Halka No.17, Tahsil Dongergaon, Disfrict Rajnand- gaon(C.G.), Ao r3 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA y^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER WRTT PETmON (S) No. 6976 pf2011 Mahesh Kumar Sahu. RESPONDENTS VERSU8 State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asnihotai.J. Present: Shri T.K-Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Amn Sao, Govenmaent Advocate for the State/respondent No. 1 to 4. ORDER (Passed on 24th day ofNwember, 2011) 1. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 18.10.2011 ; (Annexure P/4), wherebythe petitioner, workmg as Patwari at Revenue Inspector Circle, Dongargaon, has been directed to work at P.H. No. 1 1, village Ashara; whereas fhe petitioner is ah-eady posted at Patwari Halka No. 15; Tahsil DongargaoiL 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is being shifted from one Patwari Halka to another Patwari Halka within a short span of time. Earlier, by order . dated 10.03.2011 (Annexure P/3), the petitioner was ordered to work at Patwari Halka No. 25, and thereafter, vide order dated 18.10.2011 (Annexure P/4), tiie petitioner has been ordered to work at Patwari Halka No. 11. As a consequence, the petitioner is mnning from one place to other like a shuttle cock and there is no stability in his life on account of orders passed in such a mamier. •.r' ,.~:-s'3^^~ ^2 3. Shri Sao., leamed counsel appearing for fhe State/respondent No. 1 to 4 submits tiiat having regard to fhe above stated obser^ation made by this Court, appropriate order shall be passed wherem stability offhe posting ofthe petitioner would be kept in mind. Till fhen, tiie impugned order dated 18.10.2011 (Amiexure P/4) shall not be given effect to. 4. In view ofthe above, according to leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioner, notfimg survives m this petition for adjudication. 5. Accordingly, tfae writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Ainit