IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No. 2991 of 2009 Date of Decision : 11.09.2009 Om Parkash ...Petitioner Versus Piari and others ...Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order passed by the learned trial Court on 8.4.2009, whereby the defendants were permitted to amend the written statement by raising a plea that he has become owner by adverse possession. Since amendment has been allowed by the learned trial Court, I do not find that it is a fit case, where this Court should exercise revisional jurisdiction to decline the amendment sought to introduce a plea howsoever unsustainable or false, it may be. In view of the said fact, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned trial Court, in the revisional jurisdiction of this Court. Dismissed. 11.09.2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE