wm'- v-y^ ^^ c'--^ ^\ BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPOR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION NOSi~% /2006 PETITIONER ^y' \^y> ^%y 8-^ ^ f\oy ..r c^ ^^' ^..y" ^" ^ RESPONDENTS ^ ^,., ^'^ (^ _ ^vUS %\^ ^sv11 Smt.Sunita Shanna, aged about 45 years, wife of Shri Om Prakash Shanna, resident of Barpali Choiffk, Behind Raj shree Photo Studio Chaiqpa, District Janj gir-Champa (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - the Secretary, School Education Deptt. Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector, District Janj gir-Champa (C.G.) 3. District Education Office Distt. Janjgir-Champa (CG) 4. Smt. Rajeshwari Sharma, wife of not known, aged about not known Assistant Teacher, High School Pamgarh, Distt. Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) Cl^ -A^ %Rft<I°PETITION ONDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 qTWII sb*11t*) C^i^ 3^? -sii'iiii-i'ii, siTllu'is, R<niuy,< * »\{*(^tt*\J>% <f *^*^ *^* ?-* «. » : aii^i 4^* (^fg^r) 3D^TqirR^i+ craT3n^Tsti4i<b y. ^ / '-" ?^aTW flf?(T sn^?r 20-7-200S:- Shri Rahu! Jha, counsel for| Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. ^dvocate for the State/respondents No.1 to 3, on advance copy. l-1eard both the counsel. By the instant petition, thej order dated 7-7-2006 whereby t^ Barpaii, Champa to Pamgarh. "he case of the petitione| Assistant Teacher in the Primary ^ and the husband of the petitione| working as Lab Technician in the The petitioner has been transferred awayfrom the piaceofthe petitione Learned counsei for the Government Policy as Tar as pc husband and wifs are supposed iearned counsst for the petitionei aliowed to make a reprssentatioi directed to decide the same, to whi no objection. +i'iiTct41-f w^v ff fWl' A^K ^aif^iTsn^r he petitioner. petitioner has chailenged her transfer |e petitioner has been transferred from is that the petitioner is working as ichool, Bankeli, District Janjgir-Champa is aiso s Government emptoyee and P.D.M., Government Hospifal, Champa. to Pamgarh, which is more than 75 km betitioner submitted that as per the ^ssible t'ne Government empioyee i.e. |o be posted at one place. Therefore, submitted that the petitioner may be to the respondent No.1 and he be i|;h learned counse! for respondents has P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3'E? -^WW^, w!\W{6, (sjdiyy ^I^I^IShtTT^ ^[200 3TT^?T4ath (l^(^'sl<a<T) 3n^Tq>rR.fi+ (WT STI^T giHNi Ban'e f WtITWTlf?tT3IT^r '-S?- Having heard learned cour(se facts and circumstences of the c^ on the merits or the case, the p|i petitioner is jusi, fair and reason^ble to make a detaiied reDresentatioh respondent No.1 raising ail her gr| today and in iurn, respondent No|. petitioner within a period of representation, in an objective r^am raised by the petitioner, in accordajnce With the direction aforesaidl irfsel for the partles, having regard to the (se, arid without expressing any opinion i|rayer made by iearned counsel for the i^ble. Therefore, the petitioner is aliowed along v/ith a copy of this petition to jevances within a period of 10 days from i|.1 shall decide the representation of the days from the date of receipt of the rtianner, after considering ail the points with law. Consequently, M.(W.)P. Nc^ Parties are entitied for +i<<Ii'i'il1-f tii^dTffteit'<faiwi<, ^Srf^IT 311^1 the petition stands disposed of. .2792/2006 also stands disposed of. certifjed copy of this order. — Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge P.T.O.