1 mss OSWPL+1917 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1917 OF 2010 VEEKALYLAL INVESTMENT PVT. LTD. .. PETITIONER Vs. MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. RESPONDENTS Mr. M. P. Vashi i/b M. P. Vashi & Associates for the petitioner Ms. Shobha Ajithkumar for MMC Mr. B. H. Mehta, AGP for R-3 CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI & R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED : 20/9/2010 P.C. A remedy of appeal is provided under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code (“the Code”). The grievance of the petitioner is that the Tahsildar has overlooked the consent terms filed by the parties in Suit No. 1564 of 1997. We must note that there is a reference to the consent terms in the order dated 19/8/2004 passed by Tahsildar about which grievance is made in this petition. By this order the 3rd respondent has refused to modify certificate issued under Section 32-M of the Bombay 2 mss OSWPL+1917 Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner shall prefer an appeal under Section 257 of the Code. If such an appeal is preferred the concerned authority shall consider it expeditiously, independently and in accordance with law, having regard to the consent terms filed in Suit No. 1564 of 1997. 3. Needless to say that so far as entry in the record of rights is concerned, the petitioner will be free to make a fresh application to the Corporation. If such an application is made that also may be disposed of independently and in accordance with law. 4. We make it clear that, we have not expressed any opinion on any of the issues involved in this petition. 5. Petition is disposed of in the aforestated terms. (SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.) (R. V. MORE, J.)