1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 17. WP/7370/2009 (SUMITRA NARHARIRAO JAGTAP V/S CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Z P LATUR AND ORS ) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Ms.Rashmi P.Hardas, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr. S.S.Manale, Adv., for R.Nos. 1 and 2. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:26/10/2010 1. Heard. The petitioner has impugned order of appointment of respondent No.3 as Anganwadi Sevika. An appeal was preferred before the learned Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, who decided against the petitioner by judgment dt.22nd Sept., 2009. The learned Additional Commissioner in his order referred to Government Resolution ABV-2006/PK-34/KA-6, issued by the Women and Child Welfare Department (respondent No.2) dt.31.3.2006. This Government Resolution could not have been put in acceleration as the case of the petitioner revolves to the events of advertisement dt.14.11.2005 and the interview was scheduled on 1.5.2006. 2 2. Learned A.G.P. points, in view of directions in Writ Petition No. 5111/2010 dt.30th July, 2010 by this Court, the Government has taken a policy decision that all such appeals will necessarily lie before appointing authority i.e. the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad. This position is not questioned by the writ petitioner. 3. In the light of above advertisement, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the learned Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, for redressal of her grievance highlighting all the points available to be agitated. 4. Writ Petition disposed of with above indication. This Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case or entitlement of the petitioner for the post to which she applied or was interviewed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... AGP/7370-09wp