Crl.Misc No M- 25245 of 2010 Anchal and another v. State of Punjab and others Present: Ms. Neeti Wadhawan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr.Bikramjit Arora, Advocate, for respondents No. 4 to 6. *** ORDER This petition has been filed on behalf of petitioners Anchal and Salim Luthra for issuance of directions to respondents No. 2 and 3 not to harass and interfere in peaceful married life of the petitioners. Notice of motion was issued on 30th August, 2010. In response to the notice of motion, reply by way of an affidavit on behalf of respondents No. 4 to 6 has been filed in the Court and the same is taken on record. Learned counsel for respondents No. 4 to 6 on the basis of reply filed in the Court submits that no threat was given and they are not interfering in the married life of the petitioners in any manner. Learned counsel also submits that respondents No. 4 to 6 have no concern with the petitioners in any manner. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that any threat can be there in future, although presently petitioners are leading happy married life. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, no further direction is required to be issued. However, if such apprehension is there, the petitioners are at liberty to move an application to the concerned police in this regard and necessary action would be taken in accordance with law if such complaint is filed by the petitioners. The petition is disposed of accordingly. (DAYA CHAUDHARY) February 24, 2011 JUDGE raghav