IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1802 of 2010 MUKUND KUMAR S/O- SON OF SRI YOGENDRA THAKUR @ BACHCHA THAKUR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR - ---------- 4 14.03.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioner is juvenile in conflict with law. He is facing charge under Sections 395/412 of Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the F.I.R., when the informant was moving on the road, five accused persons encircled and robbed him all his belongings. Four of the accused persons escaped whereas one of them was apprehended. Petitioner is the person who was apprehended from whose possession, a currency note of Rs. 500/- was recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the father of the petitioner is ready and willing to take full responsibility respecting the petitioner if, in case, he is released on bail. It is next submitted that he is in custody/remand home since 18.8.2009. A report from the concerned Probation Officer was called for by order dated 12.01.2011 which is kept with the record. It has been found by the Probation Officer that there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner. Father is serving as a Peon in a College. His elder brother is a Graduate and is an employee of L.I.C. 2 Considering the materials on record including the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner and the contents of the report of the Probation Officer, this Court, while setting aside the impugned order, directs release of the petitioner from remand home on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A.K. Tripathi, Principal Member, Juvenile Justice Board, Begusarai in Begusarai Mufassil P.S. case No. 289 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i) The two bailors shall be the father and elder brother of the petitioner. (ii) The father of the petitioner shall monitor the conduct of the petitioner and produce before the Court as and when directed for his personal production. In case of non-production on the dates fixed for his personal appearance, the Trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner (iii) During the period the petitioner would be enjoying the privilege the bail, if it is found that he is involved himself in any criminal case, the same shall be treated as breach of one of the conditions of the bail entailing cancellation. pkj (Kishore K. Mandal, J)