IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 2130, 2138 to 2141 of 2011 Decided on: April 19, 2011 1. CWP No. 2130 of 2011 Jagdish Chand vs. State of H.P. and anr. 2. CWP No. 2138 of 2011 Vinod Kumar vs. State of H.P. and anr. 3. CWP No. 2139 of 2011 Vijay Kumar vs. State of H.P. and anr. 4. CWP No. 2140 of 2011 Ashok Kumar vs. State of H.P. and anr. 5. CWP No. 2141 of 2011 Mohinder Singh vs. State of H.P. and anr. _______________________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A. G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim work charge status, seniority and other consequential benefits from the date they completed eight years of service. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No.2735 of 2010, Rakesh Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. The petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representation (s) furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. As and when the same is made, the second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of 2 production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner concerned before the second respondent. 2. We are informed that the State has filed an appeal against the above mentioned decision. Therefore, it is made clear that the implementation of the judgment, referred to above, would depend on the outcome of the decision of the Apex Court. The needful action, after verifying the facts, will be taken within a period of two months from the date of the judgment of the Apex Court. 3. With the above observations, writ petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice April 19, 2011 (Justice Sanjay Karol), (Rana/pankaj) Judge.