IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1074 of 2003 1. LALAN KUMAR JHA, son of Shri Rabindra Narain Jha, Lecturer, Department of Physics, L. N. T. college , Muzaffarpur. 2. Samar Nath Chatterjee, son of Late Balini Ranjan Chatterjee, Lecturer, Department of Physics, M.S.S.G., College, Aregaj, Motihari. 3. Kumari Rekha, Daughter of Sri Daroga Prasad, Lecturer, Department of Economics, Ram Manohar Lohia, Samarak College, Muzaffarpur. 4. Dr. Lakshman Prasad Jaiswal, son of Shiv Shankar Prasad, Lecturer, Department of Commerce, L. N. t. College, Muzaffarpur. 5. Pradeep Kumar Choudhary, son of Sri Ram Krishna Choudhary, Lecturer, Department of Physics, R.D.S. College, Muzaffarpur. 6. Phulo Paswan, son of late Kheyali Paswan, Lecturer, Department of Maithli, L. N. T. College, Muzaffarpur. 7. Md. Khatibullah Hamidi, son of Dr. H. M. Sadullah Hamidi, Lecturer, Department of Botany, Ram Manohar Lohia Samarak College, Muzaffarpur. 8. Taruneshwar Pasad Singh, son of Sri Kalikanandan Singh, Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, MPS College, Muzaffapur. 9. Om Prakash Raman, son of Shri Ramawatar Roy, Lecturer, Department of Mathematics, L. S. College, Muzaffarpur. 10. Om Prakash Roy, son of Sri Baidyanath Roy, Lecturer, Department of Physics, M.S.K.B. college, Muzaffarpur. 11. Mrs. Manish Prabha, d/o Sri D.D. Shahi, Lecturer, Department of Mathematics, M. D. D. M. College, Muzaffarpur. … Respondents. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Commissioner-cum- Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Director, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. Baba Saheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, through its Registrar 6. the Vice-Chancellor, Baba Saheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffapur. 7. The Finance Officer, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar, Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. … Respondents. ----------- 3. 02.07.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that during the pendency of this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioners with regard to UGC pay scale has been redressed but the full payment thereof has not been made yet. In view of the fact that the grievance relating to cause of action for which this writ petition had been filed has already been redressed, this court would only give liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority for payment of remaining portion of UGC pay- scale which would be extended to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law and in the uniform manner. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)