IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.9097 of 2008 CHHEDI SURI, S/O LATE SITARAM PANJIYAR, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA DAHLAN CHOWK, P.S. SAHARSA (TOWN) DISTRICT SAHARSA .. PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAMEHSWAR LOHAR, S/O NOT KNOWN, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA D.V. ROAD, SAHARSA, P.S. SAHARSA, DISTRICT SAHARSA .. OPPOSITE PARTIES **** /6/ 21.05.2010 Heard the counsel for the parties. 2. This petition is directed against the order, dated 24.01.2008, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, IV, Saharsa, in Session's Trial No. 273 of 2002, by which it has been ordered that earlier some of the documents were marked as Exhibits ‘F’ to ‘F/7’ and ‘G’ in view of the impression that they were the public documents. However, subsequently, it corrected by order, dated 05.01.2007, that those documents to be deleted from the record. However, in the impugned order, itself, it has been mentioned that it appears that there is no order to delete Exhibits ‘F’ to ‘F/7’ and ‘G’ from the exhibit list, but, when Exhibits ‘F’ to ‘F/7’ and ‘G’ are deleted from the record then it will be presumed that Exhibits ‘F’ to ‘F/7’ and ‘G’ are automatically deleted from the exhibit list. 2 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner raised the grievance regarding the deletion of the documents filed by him. It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that without hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner the document which has been marked as Exhibits ‘F’ to ‘F/7’ and ‘G’ ought not to have been deleted without hearing him. 4. The learned counsel for the other side, however, submits that he has no grievance if those documents be on record as Exhibits ‘F’ to ‘F/7’ and ‘G’ and their admissibility be considered at the time of final argument, hence, in that view of the matter the petition is disposed off with a direction to expedite the trial and disposed off the matter at the earliest. S.A. ( Gopal Prasad, J. )