THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.4799, 4757, 4764 AND 4800 OF 2010 COMMON ORDER: Since all these revisions are connected with each other, they are taken up together for disposal. The petitioner in all these revisions is a landlord. He filed petitions in R.C.Nos.133 and 134 of 2006 on the file of the III Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad, in I.A.S.R.Nos.2200, 2199, 2198 and 2201 of 2010. the first petitions are filed under Order XVI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 {“CPC” for brevity}, to summon the ACTO, Ferozguda Circle and to produce the entire file of M/s.Jagadamba Stone and Tiles Company and the second two petitions are filed under Section 151 CPC to reopen R.C.No.133 of 2006 for adducing petitioner side further evidence. The Court below rejected all the four petitions taking into account the fact that the matter is coming up for arguments and the said petitions are filed with a view to fill up the lacunas, which is not permissible especially at that stage. Having regard to the concurrent finding giving by the Court below, I see no warrant to interfere with the same. Hence, there are no merits in the revision. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. ____________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, HACJ) 26th November 2010 RRB