IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No. 443 of 2008 Date of decision : October 12, 2010 Om Parkash ....Appellant versus Shri Ram Sahai Sood and others ....Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.N. Mittal Present : Mr. Veneet Soni, Advocate for Mr. Akshay Bhan, Advocate, for the appellant Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate, for respondent no. 1 None for respondents no. 2 to 4 L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties state that the parties have amicably effected compromise in the Mediation Centre. Statement regarding compromise was recorded there on 26.7.2010. Pursuant thereto, appellant has given three post dated cheques of ` 5 lacs each to plaintiff- respondent no. 1. The appellant has also given three post dated cheques for total amount of ` 5 lacs to proforma respondent no. 3. Similarly the appellant has given six post dated cheques for total amount of ` 5 lacs to proforma respondent no. 4. Appellant has also given three post dated cheques for total amount of ` 5 lacs to Anil Kumar Sud son of proforma respondent no. 2 on behalf of her legal representatives who all have signed Regular Second Appeal No. 443 of 2008 -2- the acknowledgment of the said cheque. The case has, thus, been lawfully compromised. In view of the compromise, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise contained in proceedings dated 26.7.2010, 6.8.2010 and 17.8.2010 of the Mediation Centre which shall form part of the judgment and decree. Till encashment of all the aforesaid post dated cheques, appellant shall not be entitled to alienate the suit property in any manner except to the extent of 1/5th share therein. ( L.N. Mittal ) October 12, 2010 Judge 'dalbir'