KiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR PETiTIQNER RESPONDENTS ^'i, W.P.(C) N0.200/2011 Poonam Chanani, W/o. Pawan Kumar Chanani, aged about 45 years, R/o. A8/10, Agyey Nagar, Biiaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) Vs. 1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2. The Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. Tahsildar, Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Niab Tahsildar, Bilaspur, District Bi!aspur(C.G.) RST PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ApRearance: Mr. Goutain Khetrapal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer for respondents. ORALORDER (20.01.2011) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA.J. Heard finatly with the consent of learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner- Poonam Chanani has filed this petition for the foliowing reliefs:- 10. Relieffs) Souaht "10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records relating to the case of the petitioner. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to decide the application Annexure P/2 preferred by the industrial trade eenter on the basis of resolution passed by the Gram Panchayat. ^ W.P.(C) N0.200/2011 10.3 Any other relief deems frt in the present facts and circumstances of this case may also be awarded to the petitioner." The petitloner, thus in substance, is praying for a direction to respondent No. 3 to decide 'ner application for grant of lease for a brick claim, which she has filed in the year 2003. Mr. Goutam Khetrapai, learned counset for the petitioner, has filed an auditional documents, which is memo dated 02.06.10 issued by Collector, Bilaspur to Sub-Divisionai Officer (Revenue), Bilaspur for completion of formality relating to grant of iease of the petitioner, for which Revenue Case No. 77/A-19/2002-03 of ^he Court of Collector, Biiaspur was registered. it appears that the a'oove Revenue Case was sent by Collector, Bilaspur to the Suu-Divisionai Officer for completion of the formality and it was not received till 02.06.2010. Mr. Goutam Khetrapal submits that the Cotlector as also the Sub-Divisional Officer, both may be uirected to dispose ofthe Revenue Case No. 77/A-19/2002- 03 within the stipulated period granted to them by this Court. Mr. Arvind Dubey, tearned counset for the respondents, does not oppose the above prayer rnade by the leamed counse! for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the concerneu Coiiector and the Sub Divisional Offlcer shall try to dispose of the tRevenue Case No. 77/A-19/2002-03 for grant of lease to the petitioner as eariy as possible preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of production of copy of this order. the above obsen/ation/direction, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. There shall be no order as to cost(s). Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge