1 Cri.A.2493.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2493 OF 2011 Saw Chaya W/o Dattatrya Surwase R/o Tuljapur, Tq. Tuljapur, District Osmanabad. ...APPLICANT. VERSUS 1) The State of Maharashtra, ...RESPONDENT. ... Shri. R.V.Naiknavare,Advocate for Applicant. Shri.N.H.Borade, A.P.P. for Respondent-State. Shri R.P.Bhumkar,Advocate for original complainant. ... CORAM: T.V.NALAWADE, J. DATE : 4TH JULY, 2011. PER COURT : 1. This application is filed for anticipatory bail, in Crime No. 54 of 2011, registered with Tuljapur Police Station, Tq. Tuljapur, District Osamanbad, for the offence punishable under sections 306, 504 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Papers of investigation are made available by the APP. Both sides are heard. 2. Crime is registered on the basis of dying declaration given by Sau. 2 Cri.A.2493.11 Suman Mohan Gaikwad of 40 years age. She was mother of a lecturer. In the dying declaration she has disclosed that present applicant was harassing her without any reason since last six months She has made allegation that present applicant was picking up quarrels. Applicant was abusing her in filthy language and ultimately due to repeated incidents of quarrel Suman set fire on herself. Police have recorded the statements of neighbourers. Statement show that on the day of incident also present applicant had picked up quarrel with deceased. There is statement of a lady Archana Datta Dhale to show that abuses in filthy language were given and present applicant was asking as to when the deceased would die. There are statements of other neighbourers which includes statement of Dagdu Shendge. It was submitted for present applicant that on the basis of private complaint filed by the applicant against Dagdu Bhanudas Shendge, cognizance of offence is taken by the Court of Magistrate. It was submitted for the prosecution that as deceased was not ready to act as witness,for the deceased was pressurized by the present applicant and was harassing the deceased. 3. Material collected by the Police show that neighbours did not come forward against the applicant as she is of quarrel some nature and nobody from that locality is ready to intervene when she picks up quarrels with 3 Cri.A.2493.11 other persons. They have stated that she is harassing every body. In view of these circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant discretionary relief infavour of the applicant. So application stands rejected. Interim relief, if any, granted earlier stands vacated. No further interim relief. Sd/- [ T.V.NALAWADE, J.] MTK