1 WP 5586.2010 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5586 OF 2010 Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.P.N.Kutti, Advocate for the Petitioners. ............................ CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 25/07/2011 PER COURT : 1. Initially this Court had issued notice to the respondents. The respondents though served, were absent. Thereafter on 13/6/2011 the notice of final disposal was issued to the respondents. The office endorsement shows that the said notice of final disposal is served. Still the respondents are absent. 2. Heard Mr. Kutti, the learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioner impugns the order passed by the Consumer Court, wherein the present petitioners in the capacity of the Directors of Respondent no. 3 – Society have been held jointly and severally liable to pay the amount to 2 WP 5586.2010 the complainant. 3. Mr. Kutti, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioners can not be made liable and the Consumer Court would not have any jurisdiction to pass any order against the petitioners in the capacity as Directors of the respondent no. 3 – Society to pay the amount to the complainant. 4. The said issue is no longer res intigra in view of the Judgment of this Court in a case of Sau. Varsha Ravindra Isai V/s Sau. Rajashri Rajkumar Chaudhari & Oths. Reported in 2011 ( 2 ) AIR Bom. R – 677. In view of the Judgment of this Court in case of Sau. Varsha Ravindra Isai referred supra, the impugned order to the extent of the petitioners is quashed and set aside and the Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause ‘ B ’. No costs. [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ] KNP/WP 5586.2010