IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5887 of 2011 1. MADHO YADAV 2. AJIT KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 21.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioners being father and the brother of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of demand of colour T.V. and motorcycle and for non-fulfillment of the same, the victim was killed. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during the investigation it has come that the victim consumed poison. Considering the fact that the anticipatory bail application of mother-in-law is rejected vide Cr. Misc. No. 44935 of 2009, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner no.1. So far as petitioner no.2 is concerned, since, there is no specific accusation against the petitioner 2 no.2 and the uncle of the husband Ragho Yadav has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court, let the above named petitioner no.2, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Kako (Bhalawar O.P) P.S. Case No. 43/09, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)