aWE @Egxm-g @ / C F Y U O f / IN THE HON‘BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH At BILASPUR Writ Petition (s) No.4503 /2oo6 90 Q ' I 03\% R L% ‘ Nylo &Ae New t r t PETITIONER : ' Ramanand Sahu S/o Late Shri. Kriparam Sahu Aged about 54 Years, Employed as Data Assistant, 0/0 (E&M) Regional Work Shop, Sub-Division, Water Resources Department; Raipur Residing at : Ganesh Nagar, Shri Om Vihar Colony, Mahadev Ghat, RAIPUR (CG). Versus RESPONDENTS : X1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, ' Water Resources Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, RAIPUR — 49 1 002 (CG) 2. , f, The Engineer—in-Chief Water Resources Department, Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lines, RAIPUR — 492001 (CG) The Chief Engineer, Mahanadi Project, Raipur Water Resources Department, S.R.P.Chowk, Shankar Nagar Road, RAIPUR — 492001 (CG) x 4. The Superintending Engineer, Electrical and Mechanical Circle, Water Resources Department, Civil Lines, RAIPUR — 492001(CG) 5. The Executive Engineer, Heavy Equipment (E&M) Division, Water Resources Deptt. OCM-Chowk Irrigation Department, RAIPUR (CG) WRIT PETITION CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY MANDAMUS ETC. yr UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE XI-HC—78 E W , m — ¢ , W Wm ~WB£9}W..@&SD1H3 200g Wm (W) mam mmm )\ WW§WW wmmm §aaxf§tranw Soma 29-8-2006 Mr. B.P. Rao, counsel for the petitioner. G v Mr. Satish Gupta. Deputy t‘ Advocate for the State/respondents, on advance copy. Heard both the counsei. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as Data Assistant in the respondent Department on 8 6-1 980 in the pay scaie of Rs.120—170/- which was revised in the 5‘“ Pay C mmission to Rs.3‘500-5.200/-, but since 1980 the petitioner has not been granted the benefit of Assured Career Progression scheme, whereas he i entitled for first promotion on compietion of 12 years and second on com ietion of 24 years. The petitioner has compieted 26 years of service and he has not been granted any promotion as per the ACP scheme. The petiti ner made a representation to respondent No.3 for granting the benefit of AC scheme, but same has not been granted to him. Having heard iearned coun ei for the parties, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the cas and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case. the petitioner is flowed to make a detailed representation raising ail his grievances annexi g a copy of the writ petition and its q annexures to respondent No.2 wit in ten days from today and respondent No.2 is directed to decide the rep esentation within three months from the date of its receipt after considering the points :aised by the petitioner, in‘an objective manner, in accordance wit iaw. With the direction aforesaid,t e petition stands disposed of, Parties are entitled for certifie copy of this order. Sdl— L.C. Bhadoo Judge l I'. LU.