1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHHI'I‘ISGARH : BILASPUR Wn‘t Petition (C) No. 194 of 2009 Petitioner Pushpa Devi S0111, W10 Vinod Kumar Swamkar, aged about 4-5 years, R/o F‘mnt of Bus Stand, Yadav Para, Dhamdha, Dishict Durg (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretaly, Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, G. E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) > 2. The Naib Tahsildar, .Dhamdha, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.) 3. Secretary, Gram Panchayat Danikokdi, Block Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.) 4. Baxatu, Sio Rajaram Samami, age not known, R/o Village Danikokdi, phamdha, District Durg (C.G.) 5. Gauri Bai, W/o Budharu, age not known, R/o Village Danikokdi, Dhamdha, District Birsa’ Bai, W/o Mohan, age not known, R/o Village Danikokdi, Dhamdha, District Durg (C'G') Durg (C.G.) 7. Shyamlal, S/o Sudheram Gond, age not known, R10 Village Danikokdi, Dhamdha, District ~ Durg (C.G.) 8. P‘ekuram, S/o Pains Mehar, age not known, R/o Village Danikokdi, Dhamdha, District Durg (C..G.) (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Consnmtion of India) (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotn‘ J.) Shri Vivek Shanna, Advocate for the petm''oner. Shri Shashank :Piiakurwiéanel Lawyer for the respondents No.1 and 2. ORDER 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the peu‘tioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw mis petition with Liberty to take recourse to the jurisdicu‘onal competent Court under provisions oflaw. \ \\ ( Passed on this 15m Day ofJanua'Iy, 2009 ) t \ Learned counsel appealing for the respondents] State has no objection. Thakur withdrawn with the afore-stated libeny. Consequently, I.A.No.1 is also dismissed. ‘ H sd/— J Satish K. Agnihotri 7 J Judge W