\4 40l $-* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + w.P.(cRL) 32st20rr VIPIN & ANR ""' Petitioner Through: Mr. M.M. Singh &' Mr. S.K. Singh, Advocates VETSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for the State with SI Alok Bajpai, PS SP Badli. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER oh 05.08.2011 ,Sub-Inspector Joginder from Rohtak is present in Court and states that a cancellation report dated 7tr' June, 2OII has been prepared in FIR No. 1l9l20lI under Section 363/355 IPC. Respondent No. 3 is not present despite service. Apparently, as he has no grievance left he has stated to the Investigating Officer that this FIR may be closed and thus he has not appeared. Learned counsel for the Petitioner on instructions from the Petitioners also states that for the time being they are not receiving any threat, however at any stage if they receive threat, they would approach the SHO concerned who would take action in accordance with law. Petition is disposed of. Order Dasti. Itv^&n /1r,'n // / t- . MUKTA GUPTA, J. AUGUST 05, 201L 'dk' Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified