IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1455 of 2006 (M/S) Jai Deep Agarwal, S/O Late Sri Kashinath Agarwal, R/O Village Jaunpur Patti Sukari, Tehsil Kotdwar District Pauri Garhwal at present R/O Badrinath Road, Kotdwar, Pauri Garhwal.(Defendant) …… Petitioner. Versus 1. District Judge, Pauri Garhwal. 2. Lal Singh S/O Sri Veer Singh, R/O Village Padampur Patti Sukari, Tehsil Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal. (Plaintiff) … Respondents. Sri H.M.Bhatia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Gopal Narain Srivastava, learned Brief Holder for the State-respondent no. 1. Sri Sharad Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. Dated May 02, 2007. Hon'ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition for quashing the order dated 24.8.2006 ( Annexure No.7) passed by the District Judge Pauri Garhwal, whereby the appeal preferred by the plaintiff-respondent against the dismissal of temporary injunction application was allowed and the defendant has been restrained to make any interference to dispossess plaintiff Lal Singh during the pendency of the suit. Plaintiff-respondent no.2 Lal Singh filed a suit for permanent injunction against the petitioner in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kotdwar, which was registered Original Suit No. 28 of 2004. Along with the suit, the plaintiff also filed application for temporary injunction paper no. 5-C. The trial court dismissed the application for temporary injunction vide order dated 31-1-2005. Aggrieved, the plaintiff Lal Singh preferred Misc. Civil Appeal No. 7 of 2006 before the District Judge Pauri Garhwal. The appellate court after considering the three ingredients necessary for grant of temporary injunction allowed the application for grant of temporary injunction of the plaintiff vide order dated 24-8-2006 as referred to above. In the course of arguments, learned counsel for the parties urged that it will be in the interest of justice that a direction may be issued to the trial court for expeditious disposal of the original suit and till the decision of the suit, both the parties may be ordered to maintain status quo. In the circumstances of the case without entering into merits of the case and to meet the ends of justice, the Civil Judge Junior Division, Kotdwar (Pauri Garhwal) is directed to decide the Original Suit No. 28 of 2004, Lal Singh Vs. Jaideep Agarwal on merit in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of one year from today. Till the decision of the suit, both the parties shall maintain status quo. To this extent, the order dated 24- 8-2006 under challenge stands modified. Both the parties shall cooperate with the trial court in the speedy decision of the suit. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of finally. All applications stand disposed of. (B.S. Verma, J.) RCP