IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.8233 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.92 OF 2004 Ravindra @ Vijay Bhikaji Jadhav ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ...... Mr.S.V.Kotwal i/b Mr.M.S.Mohite for Applicant. Mr.Y.S.Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DECEMBER 23, 2005. DECEMBER 23, 2005. DECEMBER 23, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the Application, which, to my mind, are sufficient cause, Application allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (c). : 2 : 3. This indulgence is shown on the assurance given by the Counsel for the Applicant that office objections, if any, will be removed within three weeks from today. On failure to do so, the Office will proceed on the assumption that this Application has been rejected, thereby, restoring the earlier order. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.