c^ ^3^L] ,2011 ll.-'"^ .^^- .^£^y c' ..-••:.^^-y' ^yy •S?'' .^" ...-• ^- Dolamani Samal S/o Shri Mitabhanu Samal Aged 59 Years, Asistant Teacher, Adiwasi Kanya Ashrain Basna Disti-ict Mahasamund (C.Gj The State Govt. of Chhattishgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Departinent, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) < .--*» '% 1, '"B5^ J^ v.^^ ^SBa XPHC—78 311^1 ^il fi;-ii+ ^IT ^i^T 9t)*<i°h -Jr- v ~3^ -<fWM<i, •S-^WW, fs«ylHy,< ..lOjD.(i.2.MA..:...3.^.aly/Ji STI^T'T?^ (ipfgqr^tr) ?^iTWSfel 311^1 SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohdn Shrivastava, 4. La\|^er 28-08-2011 Shri Somkant Verma, couns^l Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel La\j^ 'vvith the consent of learneijl finally. The petitioner was appointetf completing tne probation period of ^ Learned counsel appearin^ invoived in the case is as to wheth^r with efFect from the date of initiai penod. The issue involved herein vt Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur 11(1 others v. State ofm.P. S. omersji teachers are entitled to regular appointment. The matter was tak^n Leave Petition (Civii) No.6892/93. Supreme Coun, uphoiding the Teachers/'Assistant Teachers are initial appointment. Learned counsei appearing] Court, while considering the same Chhattisgarh & Others [W.P.(S) allowed the petitioners to make ^ raising all their grievanoes and in tijir tak^n '^iraf^raN 'W^ff ^ 'ft^ ^T^R ^TaifOTsn^r for the petitioner. for the State. counsei for the parties, the matter is heard on a fixed pay of Rs.100/-. After successfully ' years, he was granted regular pay scale. for the petitioner submits that the issue ', the petitioner is entitled to reguiar pay scaie appointment or after completion of probation lltl Ffay j'as considered by the Madhya Pradesh Staie O.A.No.2745/89 [Madhukant Yaau and 5B wherein, it was heid that the simiiarly situated scale with effect from the date of initial up to the Hon'bie Supreme Court in special -he said petition was dismissed by the Hon'bie d^cision of the Tribunal to the effect that the ^ntitled to regular pay scale from the date of for the petitioners further submits that this iissue in Amar Sai Ram & Others v. State of ]No. 4725/20061 by order datea' 01/09/2006, representation within a period of ten days, 1, the conoerned respondent was directed to titrn ^^' ^ «-;.3i'SXl-HC—78 an^rqn h-f ^ftff ^rt*t?i a**iiqa 'S^ '^ww-f, gfll-y'is, fsicii'My 'wwirgffli'* ^QP(.e>) i^-O 200 311^1 4^'h ('yI^S't) ^•flW •yfgti ^^.w -.?• declde the representation in an the date of receipt of the representatijsn. Learned counsel for the petiiii|iner has issued an order on 5 January) ordered that those who have been nxed pay, are entitied to regular ps^ upon successfut completion of 2 yeaijs Aocordingly, the petitioner i^ ralsing all his grievanoes, in the ligi^ 05/01/2011, and in tum, the conc^rned representation, If any, in accordance ] three months frorri the date Of receipjt ofthefacts. . 1 n view of the ioregolng, this pf objei|rtive manner within a period of 30 days from '%i^t?^N i:irq?ff "^fe^ <f^$R ^aifirosi^n further submits that now the State Govt. 2011 (Annexure P/5) wherein, It has been ^ppolnted before 1982 and after 1S95 on a |y scale from the date of inltlal appointment period of probation. granted liberty to make a representation of the aforesaid judgment and order dated respondent Is directed to decids the [with faw, on its own merits, witttin a period of of ihe representation, subject to veriflcation ^tition is finally disposed of. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge 11 ^..J