CR No.3819 of 2011 (O&M) - 1 - ***** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.3819 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:03.06.2011. Daljit Kaur ...Petitioner Versus Dhanda Charitable Trust Regd. ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. P.S.Punia, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This revision petition is directed against order dated 19.09.2002 by which the learned Rent Controller, Ludhiana had passed an ex-parte order of eviction against the tenant and the order dated 27.04.2011 by which application filed under Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [for short “CPC”] by the tenant for setting aside the aforesaid ex-parte order of eviction, has been declined. Admittedly, the tenant had appeared in the eviction petition on 05.05.1999 and filed her written statement on 16.10.1999. When the case was fixed for her evidence on 21.05.2002, both the tenant and her advocate disappeared and she was proceeded against ex-parte. Thereafter, the case was fixed for ex-parte evidence of the landlord on 27.05.2002 and ultimately on 19.09.2002 the ex-parte order of eviction was passed. The tenant had filed an application for setting aside the ex-parte order on 10.03.2003 which was apparently found to be beyond limitation for which no sufficient explanation has been given. Although learned counsel for the petitioner has argued vehemently CR No.3819 of 2011 (O&M) - 2 - ***** to convince this Court that the order passed by the learned Rent Controller is illegal, but he could not assign any reason for non-appearance of the petitioner/tenant before the learned Rent Controller and for filing the application for setting aside the ex-parte order after the expiry of the limitation. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances, I do not find any reason to interfere in the impugned order and hence, the revision petition is hereby dismissed in limine. No costs. June 03, 2011. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE