IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.15829 of 2011 Date of Decision: August 26, 2011 Budh Ram & others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Ranjit Saini, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The primary grievance of the petitioners is that they were the proprietors and are in possession but were not impleaded before the authorities. Two proprietors moved an application under Section 13-A of the Punjab Village Common Land Act. If the petitioners were aggrieved against their non-impleadment, they could have approached the authority which had passed the order. At this stage, no interference in the writ petition is called for. The petitioners, if so advised, may have their remedy. Dismissed. August 26, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE