AB 1879/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. MERUNO Heard Dr. B. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B.S. Sin ha, learned Addl. P.P. appearing on behalf of the State of Assam, who has produc ed the relevant case diary as called for by this Court. According to the submissions of the learned Addl. P.P, the statements, w hich are relied upon by him in the case diary, this Court is presumed to be the true statements recorded in the aforesaid case diary. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the parties, I am of the considered view that the petitioners, namely, (1) Md. Putul Ali, S/o Late Uma A li, (2) Arbjan Begum, W/o Late Uma Ali, (3) Md. Jitul Ali, S/o Late Uma Ali & (4 ) Md. Latif Ali, S/o Late Karmsa Aliand, are entitled to be granted the benefit of pre-arrest bail. In this view of the matter, it is directed that in the event of arrest o f the petitioners, in connection with Baihata Chariali P.S. Case No.103/2011 cor responding to GR Case No. 620/2001, registered under Sections 498(A)/34 IPC, the y shall be enlarged on bail by the Investigating Officer on such terms and condi tions as deem fit and proper to his satisfaction. The interim bail granted by this Court on 29-06-2011 stands merged with this order. With the above direction, this anticipatory bail application stands disp osed of.