IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22877 of 2009 SANJEEV KUMAR RAI @ MUNNA, son of Late-Vishwanath Rai, resident of village-Raipura, P.S.-Karza, District-Muzaffarpur(West). ……Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Mamta Kumari, wife of Sanjeev Kumar Rai @ Munna and daughter of Arvind Rai, Presently residing at Village-Rampur Sah, P.S.-Kanti, District-Muzaffarpur. ……Opposite Parties. ----------- 02. 04.09.2009 Petitioner is the husband and apprehends arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. C-1038 of 2007 instituted under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code read with Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The complaint has been filed on 12.07.2007 inter alia alleging that the complainant and the petitioner were married on 13.07.2004. Thereafter the petitioner and others started demanding dowry and abusing and assaulting the complainant and ultimately on 01.07.2007 accused persons took away the belongings of the complainant and thrown her out. On behalf of the petitioner, it is submitted that it is absolutely a false and concocted case. It is submitted that prior to the said case the petitioner had filed a complaint on 06.07.2007 being Complaint Case No. C-1000 of 2007 against the complainant, her father and other relations including accused No. 5 therein being the second husband of the complainant. It is stated that the petitioner is a forty 2 percent physically challenged person having been inflicted by Polio. His wife upon marriage could nor reconcile to this fact and as such abandoned him and went away. Her father got her married to accused No. 5 of the Complaint Case No. C- 1000 of 2007. This case having been filed, the present case has been falsely filed as a defence. In the facts and circumstances stated above, let the petitioner namely Sanjeev Kumar Rai @ Munna, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on Anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, (West) Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint Case No. C-1038 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. Shageer (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J)