€) c^ ^o A IN THE HIOH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.c.c.No. -;L-/7r) Applicant : p.. ^-^;^' ^^A'- -^ ^ Ubheram aged about 60 years, Son of Shri Pyarelal Marar resident of village Arsitola, .^^^;r^;::: District Rajnandgaon.^.PT^ 6~. ^f€i Respondents Yersus 1) Smt. Pawara Bai Aged about 75 years, Widow of Late Shri Banshilal resident of KiJfcapara Dongargaon, TahsU Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon 2) Shri Jethu aged about 47 years, Son of late Shri Banshiram, Resident of Village Umardah, Post Belmar, Tahsil Balod, District Durg (M.P,); Cc - ^ ) 3) Samund Bai aged about 42 years, Wife of Shri Lakhan Marar, Resident of Kilapara Dongargaon, Tahsil Dongargaon, Distorict Rajnandgaon. 4) Sushila aged 45 years, dau^iter of Shri Ramadhin, 5) Kaushalya aged about 39 years, daughter of Shri Ramadhin both residents of Lokpur, Thasil Dongargaon, District RajnandgaoH; 6)t Ramu Aged 74 years Son of Shri Bogar, resident of village Arsitola, Tahsil Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE SECOND APPEAL No.943/1996 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ?NI% HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR M.C.C.No.1of2010 APPLICANT: RESPONDENTS: Ubheram Versus 1. Smt. Pawara Bai 2. Shri dethu 3. Samund Bai 4. Sushila 5. Kaushalya 6. Ramu {Application for restoration of Second Appeal No.943/1996} Present: f None present for the applicant. Soma Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma. J ORDER (29-10-2012) 1. VVhen the matter is called for hearing, hone present for the applicant. No representation is made. 2. In absence of any representation on behalf of the applicant, this Court is left with no option except to dismiss the M.C.C. for want of prosecution. 3. The M.C.C. is also dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. —— Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge