IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8823 of 2010 1. SITA RAM YADAV 2. BUCHCHA YADAV 3. MANOJ YADAV 4. PRAMOD YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 12.03.2010 While pressing this application for anticipatory bail, it has been candidly submitted that going by the allegation in the F.I.R., provisions contained under SC/ST Act shall not be applicable so far as the petitioners are concerned. It is next contended that there is land dispute between the parties which resulted in the lodging of the present case. Learned counsel tried to impress that the allegation constituting offence under SC/ST Act may be applicable against co-accused Pramod Yadav and Lalkoo Pandey. Any finding/observation with regard to the applicability or non-applicability of the sections at this stage shall cause prejudice either to the complainant/informant or to the petitioners. This Court, therefore, refrains from observing anything on the said submission. This Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail although other sections of the Penal Code, as per submissions, are bailable. Let the petitioners surrender in the court below and apply for regular bail, which shall be considered on its 2 own merit having regard to the allegations on record uninfluenced by the present order. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )