WP(C) 165/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. P. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner as well a s Mr. D. Das, learned Standing Counsel, BTC. This writ petition has been filed making a grievance against Ann exure-III notification dated 30.12.2008, by which, the petitioner has been trans ferred and posted at Kokrajhar Development Block and in his place the respondent No. 6 has been posted. Mr. Das, learned Standing Counsel, BTC, submits that the ground urged towards assailing the transfer order are all vague and indefinite and it i s not sustainable. He further submits that as per his instruction, the responden t No. 6 has already joined in the new place of posting pursuant to the impugned order of transfer dated 30.12.2008. Considering the matter in its entirety and in view of limited sc ope of interference in such matter exercising the power of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, I dispose of this writ petition provi ding that the petitioner may make representation against the impugned order date d 30.12.2008 within one week from today to the Secretary, BTC, Kokrajhar, who ha s issued the impugned order dated 30.12.2008. In the event of making such repres entation, the said Secretary may dispose of the same in accordance with law. Entire exercise shall be carried out as expeditiously as possibl e, but at any rate not later than 1st week of February, 2009. Till then, status- quo as on today shall be maintained. With the above direction, writ petition stands disposed of.