IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.10052 of 2010 BHUPENDRA YADAV, Son of Sabar Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 10.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 498(A) and 494 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant had alleged torture for demand of dowry and also that petitioner had contracted another marriage. Learned counsel for the petitioner denies the allegation. He submits that compromise has arrived at between the parties. He submits that as per the compromise, he would pay a sum of Rs. 4,000/- per month to the complainant regularly by 15th of the following months. He further submits that it would be open for the complainant even to reside with him. Counsel for the informant does not controvert the aforesaid submissions. Having heard the counsel for the parties, this Court observes as follows: No coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner within a period of 8 weeks from today in connection with Budha Colony P.S. Case no. 26 of 2009 pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna. If, in the meantime, the complainant appears before the - 2 - court below and supports the factum of compromise, learned Magistrate would confirm the interim bail granted to the petitioner to his satisfaction. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)