IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17885 of 2010 1. MUKUL RANJAN DEO S/O SRI ARUN KUMAR R/O VILL ITAHARI,, P.S.FULLIDUMAR, DISTT-BANKA------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PRIMARY AND ADULT EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, PRIMARY AND ADULT EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE BANKA 5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENENT OF EDUCATION BANKA 6. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER FULLIDUMAR, BANKA 7. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER FULLIDUMAR, BANKA 8. MR. PARMESHWAR MANJHI S/O NOT KNOWN GRAM PANCHAYAT, FULLIDUMAR, SOUTH-KOJHI, BLOCK-FULLIDUMAR, DISTT-BANKA-CUM- CHAIRMAN OF THE PANCHAYAT SHIKSHAK SELECTION COMMITTEE, FULLIDUMAR KOJHI GRAM PANCHAYAT, DISTT-BANKA, MUKHIYA 9. MR. JANARDAN JHA S/O NOT KNOWN GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ FULLIDUMAR SOUTH KOJHI, BLOCK-FULLIDUMAR, DISTT-BANKA, THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY ----------- 2 18.5.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Since there is already an order in favour of the petitioner as would be evident from perusal of annexure-1 the Court fails to understand as to why a separate writ application has been filed. If there is failure on the part of the respondents to comply the earlier order of the Court the petitioner has to choose appropriate forum for agitating the matter. To that extent he cannot be allowed to demand mandamus for enforcement of a mandamus order. This writ application is an ill advised writ. This writ application is dismissed. Liberty is however given to the petitioner to file a contempt application for redressal of his grievance. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)