IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9253 of 2011 Guneshwar Bhagat … Petitioner Versus Ramashish Bhagat & Ors …. Respondents ----------- 4. 30.06.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed against the order dated 5.1.2010 whereby the learned court below stayed the further proceeding of the present Title Suit No. 2 of 2008 till the disposal of Title Appeal No. 86 of 2007. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the reliefs claimed in both the suits are different, therefore, the learned court below had no jurisdiction to stay the further proceeding of the subsequent suit filed by the petitioner. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned court below after perusal of the records of both the cases found that the subject matter of both the suits is same, the parties are same and also the reliefs are same. In such circumstances, in my opinion, the learned court below has rightly exercised the jurisdiction vested in it under Section 10 of Code of Civil Procedure. Therefore, in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the impugned order cannot be interfered with. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)