1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO. 17 OF 2007 M/s Bapulal Shivabhai Vs. M/s Patel Bapulal Shivabhai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or Court's or Judge's Orders directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. M. G. Bhangde Sr. Counsel for appellant. Mr. A. S. Chandurkar Adv for respondents. CORAM: K. U. CHANDIWAL J. DATED: 5 th JULY, 2010. Heard. Learned counsel for the respondent urged to stay the operation of the order for a period of six weeks. This is opposed by the learned Senior Counsel representing the appellant. 2. Learned Senior Counsel informs, the conduct of the respondent does not warrant to entertain stay to the orders of clamping injunction. The defiance to the interim order being writ large which also speaks volumes to the conduct of the 2 respondent. 3. With all said and done, though prima facie I find that using the trade mark showing the plaintiff firm as associate may amount to deception coupled with fraud, still since the respondent ultimately desires to challenge and test the order, operation of the order is stayed upto 19th July 2010. JUDGE svk