1 W.P.1382.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. WRIT PETITION NO. 1382 OF 2010 Dr. Avinash Daulatrao Yelikar and another ... PETITIONERS V E R S U S Maruti S/o Pandurang Yelikar and anotaher ... RESPONDENTS ... Mr. V.G.Sakolkar,Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. P.G.Mahalnkar Advocate holding for Mr. N.D.Kendre,Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. H.B.Nandagauale,Advocate for respondent No.2 to 6. ... CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR, J. DATE : 30th APRIL, 2010. PER COURT : 1] Heard learned counsel 2] Mr. Sakolkar, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the matter is at the fag-end and posted for the argument, infact impugned order shows that, it is not amendment which is of substantial nature, but is only formal one. The rectification permitted in order to show the name of defendant Nos. 6 and 8 in genealogical tree, would not cause any prejudice to the petitioners nor it would require any further evidence in the matter. The petition is, therefore, disposed of. 2 W.P.1382.10 3] It is made clear that the trial Court may proceed with final order without being prejudiced by result of this petition and decide the same on its own merits. Sd/- ( V.R.KINGAONKAR ) JUDGE MTK