0) é/ IN ligaHlGi—I COURT OF JUDICAIURE g1“ BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH man“ FETITION N0. $42000 ( ggauc INTnRESI g‘rlagxw ) P ETITIONER SUEESH SHARMA 5/0 LATE. SHRI KRISHNA SHAHMA R/o KEODABADI BUS STAND ROAD RAI GARH AGED ABOUT 39 YMRS v’ VERSUS - CHHATTISGARH, K‘ RESP ONDENTS 1, STATE 0r CHHATTISGARH THROUGI THE. SECRETA URBAN ADMINI STRATION NVD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT THE COLLECTOR RAIGARH DISTT. RAIGARH CI'MATTISGARHG 3., MATU RPM AGRAWAL s/o mm: NABAYAN AGRAWAL FRESI DENT , MUNI CIP AL COUNCIL RAI GARH CHHATTI S GAR“ . 4, MUNICIPAL CCUNCIL RAIGARH THROUGH ITSCHIEF MUNICIPAL OFFICER DISTRICT ‘ RAIGARH CHHATTI SGARH. wRiT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OigDIé FOR ISSUamE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO DISAISS THE RESPONDENT No.3 A5 pREsxm-g“m, MUNIcgggggcumcn, wagx3g gcaagnxsem RY WWW ' Befare: H0n¢Mr.Justice W.A.Shi‘shak _Hon.,Mr¢.Justice R‘s. Garg. ‘Heard- Shri VeP-NEm x learned counsel for the petitioner, an admissiono We are of thaview that the petitioner should apprcach the Collector to refer. the matter to the competent .State authority. In Oither words, this is not 9a” matlter to be brought befojreh a; Hue at this stage. ' in viewfot what wet have said above, this petit. ‘(Nis s‘ummar ily dismissed . Sdl- R.S. Garg Judge , a .> \ ‘