TS;' ^ INTHEHIGHCOURTPF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISG AT BILASPUR Writ PeVtion N^>. ..».^'A.°../2003 ARR/ PETITIONER RESPONDElTTS : .€^' « . ^'"'-A'p..^' ..^s^ ^y..^ ^•\<?9SS' ^^'^-' ••• '^ Pga-'manand Sahu 'Aged about 47 years S/o Shri Dasru R/o ViUage Dabrapara Baghbahra Distt Mahasamund(C,G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through S.P. Mahasajnund, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) S'sf^t- •. The/iMagistrate, Mahasajnund Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) 3. StationHouse Officer, P.S. Basana, Distt. Mahasamund (C.G.) ^' ./" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^6/22.^ OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETmONER WRIT PETmON No. 2490 PamianandSahu. RESPONDENTS VERSUS StateofCfahattisaarh S Others. WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OFINDIA SB: Hon'Me Shri SatishK. Aarihotri, J. Present: Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate forlfae petitioner. Sfari M.P.S.Bhatia,Dy.G.A.fbrtheState/respondents. ORDERfQRAD (Passedon 21st dayofOctober, 2010) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instnietions, submits that fhe grievance raisedin this petition has already come to an end and thus, this petition has beeome mfructuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side does net controvert the above submission. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disimssed as haviug become infiiictuous. ,• Sd/- Satish K. Agmhotri Judge \'m Armt li il- .,.W,^"i:i