IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 917 of 2009 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 18/06/2009 in WP NO : 11538 OF 2009 on the file of the High Court.) Between: M.Laxmaiah S/o.M.Subbanna (Force No.941160189) Occ: Serving No.99 Rapid Action Force of CRPF, R/o.No.99 RAF/CRPF, Hakimpet, J.J.Nagar, Secunderabad - 500078. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 The Government of India, represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, South Block, New Delhi 110001. 2 The Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, CGO Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi 110003. 3 The Inspector General of Police, Rapid Action Force of CRPF, RK Puram, New Delhi 110066. 4 The Commandant 99RAF/CRPF, Hakimpet Post, J.J.Nagar, Secunderabad - 500 078. 5 The Officer Commanding, B Company of 99 RAF (Rapid Action Force of CRPF) Hakimpet, J.J.Nagar, Secunderabad - 500 078. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:MR.NARINDER PAL SINGH Counsel for the Respondents: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No.917 of 2009 Oral Judgment: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) This writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned single judge made in Writ Petition No. 11538 of 2009, dated 18.6.2009. When the matter has come up for hearing, Mr. A. Rajasekhar Reddy, learned Asst. Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the respondents has produced before us copies of the proceedings dated 26.6.2009 and 10.7.2009 issued by the respondents 4 and 5 allotting family quarter bearing Nos. 7/F Type II of 99 Bn., RAF and 619/48/T/II to the appellant, which are located at a distance of about 15 kms., from the National Institute for Mentally Handicapped, Secunderabad, where the child of the appellant is being treated. He further stated that the appellant can occupy any one of the quarters mentioned above. The said proceedings are placed on record. In view of the submission of the learned counsel, the writ appeal is closed. However, the appellant is directed to occupy either of the quarters aforementioned within a period of three weeks from today, failing which, the respondents can allot the same to other needy personnel. No costs. ___________________ T.MEENA KUMARI,J Date: 20th July, 2009 _________________ SANJAY KUMAR,J pnb