1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Second Appeal No. 92 of 2008 [Smt. S.S. Khot & two ors. Vs. R.Z. Selokar & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. B.N. Mohta, Advocate for the appellants. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 02nd May,2008. 1. Heard. 2. The question raised in this appeal is contingent upon the Judgment that would be reached in Appeal against Order No. 24 of 2008. 3. Had this Court found that the decrees passed in Regular Civil Suit Nos. 1553, 1554 and 1555 all of 1985 would attain finality, since the appeal filed against them was not competent due to failure to file certified copy, then in that case, those decrees would have attained finality and in that event this Second Appeal arising out of Regular Civil Appeal No. 459 of 2000 and raising a question that once those decrees become final, was liable to be allowed. 4. Since the foundation of present Second Appeal is contingent upon what is shown by the 2 appellants and the outcome of Appeal against Order No. 24 of 2008, the said order decides the fate of present Second Appeal. 5. Today, this Court has dismissed Appeal against Order No. 24 of 2008. Only question of law agitated in the Second Appeal, therefore, looses its foundation. 6. No question of law is, thus, involved. Appeal has no merit. It is, therefore, dismissed. Judge |Hedau|