IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10226 of 2011 Binay Kumar Chaudhary, Son of Late Jamuna Kumar Chaudhary at present residing at Raj Hata, Binod Pur, District – Katihar. ........ Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Superintendent of Education, Katihar, District – Katihar. 4. The District Provident Fund Officer,District – Katihar. 5. The Accountant General, Government of Bihar, Patna. .......... Respondents ----------- 2 30.06.2011 Heard Sri Sharda Nand Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rikesh Sinha, learned AC to AAG No. 10. None appeared on behalf of Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 31.07.2010 as 'Assistant Teacher', Middle School, Batheli, District – Katihar, has prayed for directing the respondents particularly respondent nos. 3 & 4 for clearing all the retiral dues. It was submitted that save and except payment of the amount of leave encashment & G.I.C. nothing has been paid till date despite the fact that petitioner approached the authority concerned and filed representation also. In paragraph no. 8 of the petition it 2 has been categorically stated that no departmental enquiry or any proceeding was pending against him. In view of the statement made in paragraph no. 8 of the writ petition the court is of the opinion that there is no reason for the authority concerned to sit tight over the clearance of retiral dues of the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 3/ District Superintendent of Education, Katihar,to take all steps for clearing all the retiral dues of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The respondent no. 5/Accountant General, Bihar, Patna, is required to issue authorisation within four weeks after receipt of the sanction from the sate authority. So far as amount of provident fund is concerned the District Provident Fund Officer, Katihar, will take all steps to make payment of the G.P.F. amount within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. 3 It is made clear that petitioner shall be entitled to get admissible statutory interest on delayed payment. The writ petition has been allowed in terms of statement made in paragraph no. 8 of the writ petition. With above observation and direction the writ petition stands disposed of. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)