IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.16034 of 2011 Date of Decision : August 30, 2011. Promila Rani .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is working as Junior Assistant in the office of the Deputy Director, Animal Husbandry, Amritsar. She was transferred from Amritsar to Jalandhar vide order dated 29/30.6.2011 which was statedly cancelled later on and she was allowed to continue at Amritsar. The Director of the Department has issued another order dated 18.8.2011 thereby again transferring the petitioner to Jalandhar. It is stated that there are several mitigating circumstances warranting sympathetic consideration of her claim for retention in Amritsar. If that is so, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation before the Competent Authority which CWP No.16034 of 2011 [2] shall be considered sympathetically for retention of the petitioner at Amritsar and/or her posting at some nearby place, unless there are compelling administrative reasons to transfer at a far away place. The appropriate order in this regard shall be passed within a period of two weeks. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 30, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE