General, Raipur, Distt, Raipur (CG) ‘ ribal Welfare ww 5.12.2008i Mr. MK Sinha, counsel for Ms. Sum'ta Jain, PL’for th1 \z Ms. Sharrm‘la Singhai, Ass No.2. the petitioner. i State. tt. Solicitor General for the respondent r‘rThe petitioner has tiled 'fhe instant petition for‘the following relief: / WRIT‘PET'ITION UNDER ARTICL 22‘6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA >l_~nv vow RESPONDENTS 1 . t T mm vi 200 W “10.2 That, the Hon’blc Ccurt be fmther pleassd to direct thc Respondent No.2 7 Accountant General, Raipur to improve] correct the (:‘rPF account of the petitioner. 10.3 That the Hon’ble Couft be further pleased to direct the Respondent No.8 anti 4 to giant Kramonati/up—gradation r to the petitioner ,frmm 9.4.1999 With all consequential benehts.” Grievance of the petitioner is that he is presently working as Headmaster‘ in Govt. Higher condary School, Kalenda, Block— He isddue for retirement on 31st December, 2008. He has ahead 'put in more than 12 years of selvice as Headmaster and is entitled . r upgradation after completion of 12 years on the above post. Howe er, the same has been denied to him. He further submits that the pe itioner has made a representation of nt No.3 in this regard, but the same has not been considered and, de ided till date. Learned counSel for th petitioner submits that apart from . upgradation, the petitioner has also nled this petition for direction to the respondent_No.2 for proper npdating his provident fund account. However, he is not pressing ' relief at this stage, with liberty to agitate the same later on if his representation in that regard is also not considered by the respondent No.2. d Saraipali, Distt. Mahasamun. Annexure P/6 before the respo e e s Wm w 200 m mmmm 3 WmaéhjgW Learned counsel for the etitioner further submits that this > petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation for grarlt of upgr dation after completion of 12 years, before the respondent No, 1, who may be further directed to decide his representation within a specined period._ Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that in case the petitioner files a fresh representation regarding grant of upgradation after completion of 12 years of service within a period of one week from tocla‘y, the same shall be 'consipleredand decided by the respondent No. 1 within a period of eight wee ks. In View of above submissi 3ns of learned counsel for the parties, the. instant petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to §le a ‘ frieshp‘representation before the respondent No.1 within a week from today for grant of upgradationv On such representation being made, the respondent No.1 ”shall consider and decide the same on its own ‘merits’ in accordance with law mthin a-further period. of eight weeks I ’V/V/"// r from the date of receipt of the re presentation. 7/,/ / _‘Dh‘irendraMishra sdl- h // Sudge