^'Niiai.s: t!6Wi d 1,/- I ^3—a IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIGN CS) N0. ? 2 T /20e6- 6/ WRJT PETITION U/A 226 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PETITIONER ^•J~'w ..- ¥)M^' ^s/^ rf^ . ,6'° RHSfQNDENTS t;T s^' \^ 0-b ^^.o.^^8 c^iw A' IAV A. Philos Akshay Mukut Tigga, aged about 44 years, son of Shri Dharmdas Tigga, Assistant Teacher, Govemment Primary School Rupsera, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, through - Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The District Education Officer, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 01. PARTICULARS ABOUT THE_PETITIONER HI6H COURT OF CHHATnSfiAftH AT BILASPW W. fl.(S) No. 117 of 2007 Petitioners : AAonsingh Khande and others Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others W. P.fSlhto. 118 of 2007 Petitioners : Tejram Bhcgat ond o-thers Versus Respondents : State of Chhdrtti^arh and others W. P.(S) No. 121 of 2007 Petitioner : Sonjay Kumar Sinha Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond onother W. P.fS) No. 126 of 2007 Petitioner : Bhuvneshwar Prosad Pradhon Versus Respondents : State of Chhuttisgarh and o-thers W. P.(S\ No. 127 of 2007 Petitwner : Kulronjan Ekka Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt-iS9arh and o-thers W. P.(S\ No. 128 of 2007 Petitwner : Smt. Bharti Bai Versus Respondents : State of ChhattiS9arh ond ano'rtier W. P.(S} No. 129 of 2007 Petitwner : Phitos Akshoy AAukut Tigga Versua Respondents : State of Qihattisg<irh and onother W. P(S) No. 130 <rf 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Prasadi Bha9at- Versus Re^iondents : State of Chhattisgurh ond anolher ra;-.:'- i^taffiSSaiii^^i^^^.s^J' W. P.{S) No. 131 of 2007 Petitioner : Sagar Sai Versus Respondents : State of Chhatti^arh and others W. P.fS)No 133 of 2007 Petitioner : Inus Bek Versus Respondents ; State of ChhattiS9arh and ano-ther W. P.fS) No 134 of 2007 Petitioner : Baliram Bho9at Versus Respondents : State of Chhattis9arh and another W. P.(S) No. 135 of Z007 Petitioner : Avinash Chondra Xfldco Versus Respondents : State of Oihatl'isgarh and others W. P.fSI No. 136 of Z007 Petitioner : Smt. Shashikala Bha9at Versus Respondents : State of Chhatt'isgarh ond another W. P.(S\ No. 137 of 2007 Petitioner : Chhanduram Bhagat Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another W. P.(S\ No. 139 of 2007 Petitioner : Ku. Clementina 71990 Versus Reqwndents : State of Chhattisgorh and another W. P.(S\ No. 145 of 2007 Petitioner : Krishna Ram Patel Versus Respondents : State of ChhaniS9arh and o-ttwrs <3^i << W. P./S^No. 147 of 20)7 Petitioner ; Laxminarayan Patel Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and ano-ther W. P.(S} No. 149 of 2007 Petitkwier ; Smt. AAaxi Miliyani Toppo Versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh ond onother W. P.(S) No. 150 of 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Rajnwni Versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh and others W. P.(S} No. 151 of 2007 Petitioner : Chamru Ram Nagdeo Verajs Respondents : State of Chhattisyirh ond others W. P.(S)No. 159 of 2007 Petitioner : Sanesh Rum Pradhon Versus Respondents ; Sta'te of Chhatti^arh ond another W. P.(S) No. 161 of 2007 Petitioner : Chhotetal Khanna Versus Respondents : State of Chhattis9<»rhand another W. P.(S} No. 165 of 2007 Petitioner : Ramkumar Choudhari Verais Respondents ; S-tate of Othattisgarh ondonother And W P.(S) No. 168 of 2007 Petitioner : Brijmohon Nayak Versus Respondents : Sta'te of Chhattisgarh and ano-ther ''saS!lt!SBf:SSS'-SSSSS^SS'SSSaSSsS!3 SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihatri. J Pnasent: Mr. A.N. Bhakta, Advocote for the petitioner(s). Mrs. An^i Ahu^i, Deputy Sovemment Advocote, Mr. Arvind Dubey.Panel Lawyer, AAs. 5unita Joun, Panel Lawyer for •the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on -this 17th Oay of Jonuary, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel oppearin9 for -the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jointly submit that the facts of the present writ petitions are similar to -that of in W. P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State Sovemment of Chhattisgarh & others), which was ullowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. They further submit •that the question of ka»mvoh/ed is also •the same. SubhMfi 2. In view of the above-stated submissions made by leamed counselfor •{lie parties, these writ petitions are atlowed m terms of the order dated 7.11.2006 passed by this Court in WJ>. (S.) No. 5976/2006 (Sushil Twiari ond others vs. State Sovemment of Chhatti^arh A others). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be placed on record in other cormected writ petitkm. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge