IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11786 of 2007 Uma Kumari @ Bibha Devi, W/o Ashwani Kumar, Resident of Village Panchayat Prataptand (West), Ward No.3, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Vaishali. ------ Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar thorough the Director Bal Vikash Pariyojna, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Commissioner Tirhut Pramandal, Muzaffarpur. 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Vaishali, Hajipur. 4. The District Magistrate, Vaishali, Hajipur. 5. The District Welfare Officer, Vaishali, Hajipur. 6. The Block Development Officer cum-Balvikash Pariyojana Officer, Bhagwanpur, Vaishali. 7. Sujita Kumari, W/o Arun Sah, Resident of Village Prataptand (West) P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Vaishali. -------- Respondents ----------- 2 17.12.2009 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “2.(a) To direct the respondent authorities to concil the appointment of respondent No.7 and further to select the most suitable candidate like petitioner. (b) To direct the respondent authorities to adopt the due process in selecting Anganwari Sevika/Sahaika in the light of letter No.1129 dt. 13.5.98 issued by the Secretary welfare department Govt. of Bihar.” In the opinion of this Court, the petitioner for the aforementioned relief was required to get the matter adjudicated by the 2 prescribed authority, namely, the Collector of the district. That having been not done by the petitioner, this Court would dispose of this writ application by giving liberty to the petitioner to file representation before the Collector of the district. Such representation if and when filed by the petitioner would be disposed of after observing principle of natural justice and within the time frame fixed by the State Government in its recent Circular dated 10.12.2009. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)