1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO. 1074 OF 2009 Mr Mubarak Abbas Shaikh .. Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondents Mr. M.S.Karnik, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. J.P.Yagnik, APP, for the Respondent. Mr S.S.Salunkhe, for respondent nos 2 to 10. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 16/07/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this application, the applicant is seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Pune vide order dated 23.2.2009 in Bail Application No.452 of 2009. The operative portion of the order reads thus: “In the event of the arrest of the applicants in the context of CR No.33/2009 registered under sections 306 read with 34 of IPC in Hinjwadi Police Station, each of them be released on bail on furnishing P.R and S.B of Rs.15,000/- The applicants shall attend the police station as T 2 and when required by the I.O in connection of the investigation of the matter.They shall cooperate with the I.O for the same. The order of anticipatory bail shall remain in force for 15 days after filing of the chargesheet. The applicants shall move the application for regular bail before the trial Court within those 15 days.” 3. From bare perusal of the order, it is clear that this application has become infructuous in view of the fact that the chargesheet has been filed. Mr.Salunkhe, learned counsel for the respondents-accused, submits that after filing of the chargesheet, the respondents-accused moved an application for regular bail and they have been granted regular bail by the concerned court. In the circumstances, the application is disposed of as infructuous. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)