IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.1076 OF 2009 1. MURARI PANDEY @ SACHIDANAND PANDEY, SON OF SURYADEO PANDEY 2. SEETA DEVI, WIFE OF MURARI PANDEY BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAWADA PANDAY TOLA, POLICE STATION KOTWA DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ********** 3 05.03.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are the father-in-law and the mother-in-law of the deceased lady and have been made accused in a case under Sections 498A, 304B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners are not named in the First Information Report and infact were not charge sheeted by the Police. The Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the offence, however no summons were issued to the petitioners and the trial began with respect to the husband of the deceased. During the trial, the informant has stated that he has lodged this case because he was misled by the villagers who had told him that the in-laws were responsible for the death of his daughter. Considering the submissions aforesaid, 2 the above named petitioners are directed to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of one month from today in Kotwa Police Station Case No. 86 of 2002 (Trial No. 3569 of 2003) on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J. )