-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRI. APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.181 OF 2008 Manoharlal Madhavdas Adwani ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondents .... Mr.Yashodhan Sakhare (appointed) Advocate for Petitioner Mrs.U.V.Kejriwal APP for State .... CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND CORAM: S.B.MHASE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : MARCH 14, 2008 DATE : MARCH 14, 2008 DATE : MARCH 14, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate appointed for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is seeking furlough. The reason for rejection of the application for furlough is that it is apprehended that the if the petitioner is released on furlough, there would be danger to the witnesses specially witness Deepakraj and his wife. The learned APP stated that Deepakraj resides at Yoginagar, Borivali, Mumbai. The learned advocate for the Petitioner has stated that the Petitioner -2- will not enter into limits of Mumbai and the Petitioner will reside at Ulhasngar which is in Thane District. In this view of the matter, we are inclined to pass the following directions. 3. The petitioner be released on furlough on the usual terms and conditions. In addition thereto, the petitioner shall not enter Mumbai. He shall reside at Ulhasnagar, Dist.Thane and he shall report to the closest police station to his residence on every alternate day. We quantify the fees of appointed Advocate Shri.Yashodhan Sakhare, at Rs.500/-. 4. Writ Petition is disposed of. [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ S.B.MHASE, J.]