CWP No.20723 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No.20723 of 2011 Date of decision December 15, 2011 Food Corporation of India Workers Union, Sangrur ....... Petitioner Versus Food Corporation of Inda and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. G. N. Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H. S. Dhandi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Navdeep Sukhna, DAG., Punjab. Mr. Brijesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.5. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?No 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?No K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be satisfied if the legal notice (Annexures P-1 and P-4) which has been addressed to respondent Nos.3 and 4 is considered and appropriate decision be taken on the issue of security to be given to the petitioner. 2. As ordered. 3. The respondent Nos.3 and 4 shall consider the legal notice (Annexure P-1 and P-4) and provide for personal security as the situation may warrant. The decision shall be taken within a period of CWP No.20723 of 2011 2 three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. While taking such a decision, the fifth respondent-worker will also be heard. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 15 , 2011 archana