IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 1st Bail Application No. 811 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Vijay Pal .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 227/2010 U/s 304-B IPC, PS Kotwali Gangnahar, District Haridwar. August 31, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Counsel for the accused applicant submitted that the applicant is father-in-law of the deceased Seema and no specific allegation has been made against him in the FIR. He was living separately from the deceased and he is not at all the beneficiary of the demand of dowry. He further submitted that applicant is an old man and he is ailing with serious diseases. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of the FIR and other papers available on record; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Vijay Pal be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of JM, Roorkee. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 31.8.2010 PRABODH