{1} Cri.W.P.No.33/2011 drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.33 OF 2011 Niranjan Shripatrao Jadhav PETITIONER VERSUS The Union of India & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. Suresh Munde, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. N.S.Chaudhari, Advocate for Union of India Mr. S.K.Tambe, APP for respondents State Mr. S.S.Deve, Advocate for respondent No.8 ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 14 th July 2011 PER COURT: 1. This is a petition, which principally prays for issuance of a writ directing respondents to decide the application filed by the petitioner. During the course of hearing it transpired that respondents have decided the application and an order thereon has been passed. In that background, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner states on instructions that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a petition afresh, challenging the order dated 17.02.2011. {2} Cri.W.P.No.33/2011 2. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/B11/cwp33-11 {3} Cri.W.P.No.33/2011 drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1029 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2667 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2668 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.33 OF 2011 Niranjan Shripatrao Jadhav APPLICANT VERSUS The Union of India & others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. Suresh Munde, Advocate for the applicant Mr. N.S.Chaudhari, Advocate for Union of India Mr. S.K.Tambe, APP for respondents State Mr. S.S.Deve, Advocate for respondent No.8 ....... [CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.] DATE : 14 th July 2011 PER COURT: 1. In the light of withdrawal of the writ petition, these applications are dismissed. [A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.] drp/B11/cwp33-11