1 A.O.82.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 82 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5947 OF 2011 Govardhan S/o Mohanlal Karva and others. ...APPELLANTS VERSUS Kunal Ashokrao Aher and others. ...RESPONDENTS ... Mrs.Anjali Dube-Bajpai,Advocate for Appellant. Mr.S.R.Choukidar,Advocate for resp.Nos 1 to 6 Mr.V.C.Patil,Advocate for Resp.Nos.7 and 8 Mr.B.A.Darak,Advocate for Resp.No.9. ... CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 17TH AUGUST, 2011 PER COURT : . Heard learned counsel for appellants and respective learned counsel appearing for respondents. All the learned counsel appearing for the parties agree that the matter can be disposed of finally at the admission stage. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for appellants and 2 A.O.82.11 respondent Nos. 1 to 6 submit that plaintiffs- appellants have filed an application under section 18 of the Registration Act. Lis is registered with the Registrar (Stamp), Registrar Office Ambad, therefore, plaintiffs should not worry and section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act will come into play and will take care of the interest of the plaintiffs. This submission of the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 6 is adopted by the learned respective counsels appearing for respondent Nos. 7 and 8. Learned counsel appearing for appellants submits that purpose of the appellant would be served if interim order passed by this Court on 14.07.2011 in respect of respondent Nos. 1 to 6 and order dated 01.08.2011 in respect of respondent Nos.7 and 8, is continued till disposal of the suit. 3. Learned counsel appearing for appellants also invited my attention to the order passed by this Court on 28.07.2011, in Writ Petition No. 3 A.O.82.11 3231 of 2011 with Civil Application No. 8745 of 2011, thereby directing the Trial Court to decide the Special Civil Suit NO. 276 of 2004 and Special Civil Suit No. 04 of 2003 expeditiously and preferably within eight weeks from today i.e. 28.07.2011. 4. In the light of the aforesaid submissions of the respective counsels for the parties, this Appeal from Order and Civil Application stands disposed of with following order, which would operate till disposal of the aforesaid suits. (i) In case, the property which is fallen to the share of respondent Nos. 1 to 6, if it is not already sold, same should not be alienated till disposal of the suit. (ii) Respondent No.8 namely Shushilabai W/o Ashokrao Aher is restrained from alienating the suit 4 A.O.82.11 properties (if it is not already sold) till disposal of above mentioned suits. . Appeal from Order and Civil Application stand disposed of accordingly. Sd/- [S.S. SHINDE, J.] MTK