The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.26052 of 2011 Date: 1st November, 2011 Between: S.Chandrakala and 5 others ..... Petitioners and The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Youth Affairs and Sports Department, A.P.Secretariat, Hyderabad – 500 022 and 5 others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri S.Satyam Reddy Counsel for Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 5: None Appeared Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sri MVS.Prasad, SC for SAAP Counsel for Respondent No.6: Sri A.V.Seshasai The Court made the following : O R D E R: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.6, in not permitting the weightlifters in the State of Andhra Pradesh to participate in the selection trials for securing a place in the national team to represent the country in Commonwealth Championship, scheduled to be held at South Africa from 10-10-2011, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioners sought for a consequential direction to respondent No.6 to permit them to participate in the selection of national team. At the hearing, it is represented by the learned Counsel for the parties that this Court by Order, dated 28-09-2011, has granted interim direction in favour of the petitioners, but the said interim order has become abortive as, by that time, the selections were already completed. It is also submitted that the event viz., Common Wealth Championship, in connection with which the present Writ Petition is filed, has already taken place. Having regard to the relief claimed in the Writ Petition and in the light of the fact that the Common Wealth Championship, in connection with which the relief is sought, has already been held, it is not necessary to adjudicate the Writ Petition on merits. Sri S.Satyam Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioners, however, submitted that grave injustice is being done to the weight lifters of Andhra Pradesh and that appropriate directions need be issued for future events. Since the pleadings raised in the Writ Petition are not adequate to issue general directions, as being sought by the learned Counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners are given liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition with comprehensive pleadings and appropriate reliefs in relation to future events. Subject to the liberty given as above, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel, WVMP.No.3966 of 2011 in/& WPMP.No.32141 of 2011 are disposed of. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 1st November, 2011 Note: Furnish CC in five days. (B/o) LUR