IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3120 OF 2004 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2004 Chhagan Bhujbal )..Applicant Versus Rajendra M.Agarwal & Anr. )..Respondents ---- Mr.A.P.Mundargi i/by M.Rustomkhan for the applicant. Mr.S.R.Shinde APP for the State. Varsha Palav for respondent no.1. ---- Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Coram : R.S.Mohite,J Date : 22.9.2008. PC 1. The matter was called out in the morning when Advocate for respondent no.1 Varsha Palav stated that she would like to withdraw from the matter as she has no instructions from respondent no.1. The matter was kept back and she was asked to file precipe for withdrawal. She has accordingly filed the precipe which is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Advocate Varsha Palav for respondent no.1 is discharged from the matter. In such circumstances, I have heard the Advocate for the applicant. In my view, the arguable points are made out in the appeal. The question as to whether any of the exceptions to section 499 of IPC would be attributed to the facts of the present case : 2 : specially in the light of the fact that no defence evidence is led. Hence, leave granted. Office to number the appeal. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2004 1. Leave has been granted by a separate order passed today. Hence, appeal admitted. (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (R.S.Mohite,J)