CWP (T) No.6740 of 2008 7.9.2010 Present: Mr.Yudhvir Thakur, , Advocate, vice counsel for the for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Rathore, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the matter in issue is squarely covered by a decision rendered by this Court in Paras Ram vs. State of H.P. and another, Latest HLJ 2009 Vol. 2 (HP) 887. According to them the facts are same and similar and similar directions are required to be issued in this petition. 2. There is no dispute that vide order dated 20.8.1992 petitioner was promoted as Block Development Officer on adhoc basis. His appointment even though for six months continued for a period of six years when he was regularized as such on 8.7.1998. 3. Consequently, the ratio of law laid down by this Court in Paras Ram (supra) shall mutatis mutandis apply to the instant case also. Necessary consequential action be positively taken within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. 4. With the above observations, the petition is disposed of. 7th September, 2010 (Sanjay Karol) (C) Judge.