BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirtieth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15639 of 2011 J. RAHESH ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED-1 Vs THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE THUCKALAY POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DT ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. C.K.M.APPAJI Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the accused and he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 341, 506(i) of I.P.C r/w Section 3 (1) of TNPPDL Act in Crime No.196 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police. 2. Heard Mr.C.K.M.Appaji, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Duraipandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused, caused damage to the car belonged to the de-facto complainant and abused him with filthy language. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is an practicing advocate and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 5. The Additional Public Prosecutor would in his argument that the petitioner along with other accused, caused damage to the car belonged to the de-facto complainant and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, suitable conditions may be imposed. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri and on executing a bond for a sum of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri and on further condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 30/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NANGUNERI, TIRUNELVELI DIST 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THUCKALAY POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DT +1. CC to M/S. C.K.M.APPAJI Advocate SR.No.42165 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15639 of 2011 Date :30/11/2011 SMA/02.12.2011/6C/2P https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/