IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Arbitration Case No. 227 of 2006 Date of Decision: 12.9.2008 M/s Aditi Construction Co. ..Petitioner versus Union of India and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.THAKUR,CHIEF JUSTICE Present : Mr. Sumit Narang, Advocate for Mr. Hemender Goswami, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ashwinie Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the Union of India **** T.S.Thakur, C.J.(Oral) Mr. Aman Arora, counsel for the petitioner is not available. Mr. Sumit Narang, proxy counsel appearing for him submits that since the respondents were changing their counsel, Mr. Arora has given instructions to him to seek an adjournment. Mr. Ashwinie Kumar Bansal, Advocate appearing for the respondents submits that there was no proposal to replace him by another counsel. Mr. Sumit Narang, Advocate knows nothing about the facts of this case nor is he able to throw any light on the nature of the controversy. In the absence of a cogent ground, I see no reason to adjourn the petition which is hereby dismissed. (T.S.THAKUR) CHIEF JUSTICE 12.09.2008 'ravinder'