....,..J HIGH COURT OF CHHATT!S©ARH: BtLASPUR WRn" PETITION (Cl N0.6585 OF 2008 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Smt. Smita Singh, W/o Shri Krishna Singh, aged about 42 years, Occupation Service, Multjpurpose Health Worker (Femaie)/Auxiliary Nurse Midwife (ANM), Section Kurenga, Sector-Potanar Community Health Centre, Tokapal, Distt. Bastar (CG). Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Health and Famiiy Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG). 2. The Director, H^lth and Family Welfare, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). 3. The Chief Medical and Heafth Offlcer, Jagdaipur, Distt. Bastar (CG). 4. The Block Medicat Officer, Communfty Health Centre. Tokapai, Distt. Bastar (CG). (Writ petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Manoj Mishra, counsel for the petittoner. Shri Bhaskar Payasi, Panel Lawyer forthe State. ORALORDER (Passed on this 25th day of November, 200S) Wfth the consent of leamed counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finally. 2) Learned counsel appearing for the p^itioner submjts that as per the directjons of the respondent authorities the petitioner, who is working as Multipurpose Health Worker (Female)/Auxiliary Nurse Midwife (ANM), performed her dutles at various pteces and submttted the Leprosy Survey report. Thereafter, the petitioner submftted a representation dated 5-4-2008 (Annexure-P/4) before the respondent No.4 requesting him to permit her to work at Sub Health Centre. 1- ^-7' / Gowri Kurenga. The petitioner also made a reque^ to allow her to stay at the Government residential accommodation situated at Kurenga. 3) I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the pleadings and the documents appended thereto. 4) The respondent No.4 forwarded the repre^ntation of the petltioner to the respondent No.S/The Chief Medical & Health Officer, who by letter dated 28-7-2008 (Annexure-P/5) refused to accept the prayer of the petitloner on the ground that the petitioner has not distributed the amount to the beneficiaries under the scheme namely, "JanQni Sursksha Yojana". By tetter dated 7-8-2008 (Annexure-P/6) the respondent No.4 asked the petitioner to vacate the Government resjdential accommodation situated at Kurenga and thereafter also reminders were sent to the petitioner for vacating the Government residential accommodation. 5) The petitioner has been transferrect on the ground of complaint made by the vittagers by raising grievance that the petitioner has ndt properiy distributed the amount to the beneficiaries urder the scheme namely, "Janani Suraksha YojQna". 6) Be that as it may, once the empSoyee has been transferred from one place to another, the emptoyee cwcerned ought to have vacated the Govemment residential accommodation so that the same can be afSotted to the newly posted employee. Thus, this petition being devoid of merit is liable to be dismissed and accordingly, it is djsmissed. 7) Consequently, I.A.No.1 for granted of ad-interim relief stands disposed of. _—— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge