THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No. 4027 of 2011. ORDER: This revision under Article 227 of the Constitution is directed against the rejection of I.A.No. 171 of 2011 in O.S.No. 654 of 2009, by the orders dt. 19.7.2011 passed by the learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. The revision petitioner is the defendant in the suit. The respondent filed the suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a revolver belonging to the revision petitioner on the basis of a receipt for Rs. 10,000/- allegedly advanced by the respondent/plaintiff to the revision petitioner towards the value of the revolver. The trial of the suit has commenced and the evidence on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant has already been recorded. When the matter was posted for arguments, the revision petitioner/defendant filed an application under Order 19 Rule 1 C.P.C. to reopen the matter for adducing the evidence of a licensed dealer of arms, Visakhapatnam to testify as to the value of the revolver for the purpose of claiming that the value of the revolver is Rs.1,50,000/- and not Rs. 25,000/- as claimed by the plaintiff. The court below rejected the application holding that the examination of a licensed dealer of arms is not necessary for adjudication of the suit claim and in view of the admission of DW.1 about Ex:A.7 and the reply letter dt. 10.5.2009, there is no primary evidence to show that the sale consideration of the revolver was fixed at Rs. 1,50,000/-. This Court discerns no error in the application of law or error in the exercise of discretion warranting interference under Article 227 of the Constitution. The revision is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 14.10.2011. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM C.R.P.No. 4027 of 2011. ORDER: Dt. 14.10.2011.