IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43617 of 2009 PAPPU RAM Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10.12.2009 Heard. It is true that a co-accused from whom also there was a recovery of arms has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court but going by my own fundamentals as regards the case under the Arms Act, considering that besides the arms as per description in the FIR and the seizure memo, some iron sheets which were the properties of theft were also recovered and further considering that the petitioner bears a criminal antecedent also, I am not inclined to direct the release of the above named petitioner on bail. Petition is dismissed. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )