IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25262 of 2010 KUNDAN KUMAR SON OF RAVINDRA PRASAD,R/O VILALGE- MAI, P.S.- HILSA, DISTRICT- NALANDA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21/07/2010 Heard Mr. Naresh Dikshit learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. This is successive anticipatory bail application of the petitioner. Earlier prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 14.1.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35104 of 2008. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased and the case was registered under Section 304 B of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that other accused persons were put on trial and they have been acquitted because the informant and other witnesses have not supported the prosecution case. This is the second anticipatory bail application of the petitioner. It appears that he was absconding and looking after the trial of others. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)