1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal Application No. 3163 of 2009 Sau Surekha v. State of Maharashtra ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr M.A. Wagh, Adv for applicant Ms R. Wasnik, APP for State Coram: A.P. Bhangale, J Dated : 24th September 2009 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Applicant is seeking bail Crime No. 58/09 registered with Police Station, Brahmapuri under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. It appears that statement under Section 27 of the Evidence Act was recorded leading to discovery of pillow. C.A. report is still awaited as also viscera report. Bail is objected also on the ground that post-mortem notes show ante-mortem injuries in the nature of contusions and abrasions. Probable cause of death is asphyxia due to throttling with alcoholic intoxication with cardiorespiratory arrest. For conformation of alcohol, viscera was preserved. Pillow which was recovered at the instance of applicant is also sent for expert opinion and report is awaited. 3. Under these circumstances, taking into consideration prima facie involvement of the applicant, she does not deserve to be released on 2 bail. Application is rejected. However, trial Court shall endeavour, if the applicant and co-accused cooperate, to dispose of trial expeditiously, without getting influenced by the aforesaid observations. Judge. hsj