IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition P.I.L. No. 788 of 2003 Peoples’ Union for Civil Liberties. .……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. .………. Respondents Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Asst. Government Advocate for the respondents. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) In furtherance of the inquiry ordered under Section 176 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a report dated 13.10.2003 was submitted by the District Magistrate, Bageshwar. During the course of hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioner read out to us some parts of the inquiry report. We are, however, of the view, that all material evidence, whether in favour of or against one or the other party, has been brought out and examined fairly. No additional material has been brought to our notice to controvert any factual aspect of the matter. In view of the findings recorded in the report dated 13.10.2003, we are of the view, that nothing more deserves to be done in furtherance of the instant writ petition filed by the Peoples’ Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL). In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of without any further directions. (B.S. Verma, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 19.02.2010 19.02.2010 G