ndm 1 ss.2883.93.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2883 OF 1993 Union Bank of India. ... PLAINTIFF Vs. Amrit Steels and anr. ... DEFENDANTS -------------- Mr. S.N.Fadia i/b Mr. N.S.Fadia for Plaintiff. -------------- CORAM : R.V. MORE, J. DATE : 26 th November, 2009. P.C. 1 Heard learned counsel for the Plaintiff. The above suit is filed under the provisions of Order 37, Rule 2 of the Criminal Procedure Code for recovery of an amount of Rs.4,36,202/- alongwith interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.3,35,965/-. The Writ of Summons was issued to the Plaintiff on 19.10.1993. In spite of that, the Plaintiff thereafter, not taken any steps to serve the Defendants. The suit is therefore, deserves to be dismissed under the provisions of Rule 227 of the Original Side Rules, 1980. 2 The suit was placed on board on 19 th November, 2009 under ndm 2 ss.2883.93.sxw the caption “for direction”. On that day, this Court has passed following orders. “Though, the suit is pending since the year-1993, the Plaintiff has not taken any action under the provisions of Rule 227 of the Original Side Rules, 1980. The record of the suit, does not disclose whether the Defendants have been served or not. 2. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff is unable to make any statement and therefore, seeks time to take instructions from his client. By way of last chance, a week’s time is granted to the Plaintiff. Stand over to 26 th November, 2009.” 3 Today, the matter is placed under the caption “dismissal” of the suit under the provisions of Rule 227 of the Original Side Rules, 1980. Since the Plaintiff failed to take steps as contemplated under the provisions of Rule 227 of the Original Side Rules, 1980, suit is dismissed with costs. [ R.V. MORE, J ]