IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.11665 of 2008 Between: The Journalist Coop. Housing Limited, (Retgd. No.T.A.76) Plot No. 127/A, Journalists "A" Colony, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-33, Represented by the President V.J.M.Divakar. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Registrar of Coop. Societies, Hyderabad. 2 The District Registrar of Coop. Societies, M.J.Road, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 The Assistant Registrar/Enquiry Officer, Sub-Divisional Coop. Officer, Office of The Divisional Coop. Officer, Golconda Division, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus directing the 1st Respondent of the representation dated 09-05-2008 seeking change of 3rd Respondent as Enquiry Officer and pending decision by the 1st Respondent restrain the 3rd Respondent from Proceeding further in Rc.No.04/2008/Inq/Section 51, dated 15.05.2008 and pass such other or further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.S.V.BHATT Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CO-OPERATION The Court made the following: THE HONBLE ’Ms, JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.11665 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Mandamus directing the 1st respondent/Registrar of Co-operative Societies to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 9.5.2008 seeking change of the 3rd respondent as Enquiry Officer. When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader for Co-operation, under instructions, stated that on the basis of the petitioner’s representation a decision has already been taken and the Commissioner for Co-operation and Registrar of Co-operative Societies vide Memo dated 6.6.2008 directed change of the Enquiry Officer. In the circumstances, no further enquiry is necessary in the Writ Petition. Accordingly, recording the statement of the learned Government Pleader that a decision has already been taken to change the Enquiry Officer as sought by the writ petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 12.06.2008. Kgr