IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22153 of 2010 MOHAN MUKUL S/o Late Ram Das Malakar resident of village Mirapur P.S. Sakara Dist. Muzaffrpur Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR Opp. Party ----------- 02/ 14.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being Mukhiya is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that vide letter no. 91 dated 08.03.2007 direction was issued by the Child Development Project Officer, Muzaffarpur for selection of Anganwari Sevika has to be done from the family whose names appear in the new BPL list of 2007 whereas vide letter no. 154 dated 21.03.2007 as contained in annexure 4 the District Magistrate intimated all Child Development Project Officers including that of Muzaffarpur for the appointment of Anganwari Sevika and Sahika, it is not necessary that candidates should be from BPL list. In view of contradictory direction appointment of Renuka Singh was made but subsequently appointment was cancelled. But since Renuka Singh challenged cancellation of her appointment before the Hon’ble High Court in which the Collector faced hard time and in retaliation the Collector ordered for lodging the first information report. Considering the fact, let the petitioner in the event of arrest/ surrender within twelve weeks from today be released on bail in connection with Sakara P.S. Case no. 135 of 2010 on furnishing bail - 2 - bond of Rs 10,000-/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. shahid (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J))