IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1311 of 2008 PRABHUNATH YADAV & ORS Versus VISHWANATH YADAV & ORS ----------- 2. 20.8.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order allowing amendment of the plaint does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. The reliance placed by the counsel for the petitioner on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Steel Authority of India vs. Union of India & ors., reported in AIR 2006 S.C. 3229, is wholly misplaced because here it is not a case that any admission made by the plaintiff in course of his examination was sought to be resiled or recalled much less the proposed amendment had the effect of changing the nature of the suit. All that the plaintiff had sought by way of amendment was to add a genealogical table and/or set out the share of the respective parties in a Partition suit, which in the opinion of this Court was only explanatory in nature. That being so, this Court does not find any merit in this application, which is accordingly dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/