IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION No. 1307 of 2005 (M/B) 1. Manoj Singh S/o Shiv Narayan Singh 2. Lakhya Devi W/o Shiv Narayan 3. Pratibha d/o Shiv Narayan Singh All r/o Shivalik Nagar, P.S. Ranipur, Haridwar, District Haridwar ……… Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through Senior Superintendent of Police, Haridwar. 2. Station House Officer, P.S. Ranipur, District Haridwar. 3. Smt. Sarita Yadav w/o Sri Manoj Singh, D/o Sri Haridwar Yadav R/o Qtr. 11E/II/1 BHEL, Ranipur, Haridwar ………. Respondents ………….. Sri Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri Vikas Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondent 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Sri Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri Vikas Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondent 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri Pande, the learned Addl. Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of the first information report and the case registered against them now has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation has filed charge-sheet against petitioner no. 2- Lakhya Devi and petitioner no. 3- Pratibha; and no case worth filing charge-sheet against the petitioner no. 1 Manoj Singh was found. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 15.06.2006 15.06.2006 A