THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22077 of 2010 Date: 07.09.2010 Between: Smt. M. Vijaya Bharati. ..... Petitioner AND The Joint Collector and others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K.V. Raghu Veer Counsel for Respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside the order dated 30.01.2010 passed by respondent No.2. I have heard Sri K.V. Raghu Veer, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies. The petitioner’s fair price shop authorization has been cancelled by the impugned order passed by respondent No.2. The main ground of attack of the impugned order is that the same is bereft of any reasons whatsoever and is consequently not sustainable. The petitioner herself admitted that against the impugned order she has availed the statutory remedy of appeal before respondent No.1 and that the same is pending. Law is well settled that a party cannot be permitted to avail parallel remedies. Having already filed the appeal, the petitioner shall pursue the same before availing further remedy in the event of adverse order being passed against her. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition at this stage. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. Respondent No.1 is directed to dispose of the appeal within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.28101 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is also dismissed as infructuous. ________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 07th September, 2010 GHN