^ ^ ^; j ^-| ^g^'s^^'' G/^ 7.V~Q IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.2-2>2 -$ OF 2005 PETITIONER S.P. Agrawal, S/o. Late Shri Sahas Ram Agrawal, Aged about 53 years, 8/0. Kelabadi, Durg, Tahsil & Distt. Durg (C.G.) ^•'..'f'*'" ,^;'»" RESPONDENT '~:"3e^ '<.•• &j f 5S^. ;*"«- ^^ ^^ VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Chief Secretary, OfHce situated at D.K.S. Qhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Secretaiy, Law & Legislative Affairs Department, OfBce situated at D.K.S. Bhawan, Secretariat Raipur (C.G.) ^ 3. The Secretary, District 8s Sessions Judge, Durg, Office situated at Durg, District Durg (C.G.) WRIT_PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA f'/ / ^w/ ^w/ 0/.£: / •* /'v~~'' ** ^^f^!/ "/w ./^<^ •' s5^ •"' ^.^ .2> '^•' .'^' ^'s»y ^7/ ^~ •::^:^:?^^£^^!W XI-HC-22 1MB 3^ 'ill-MK'l^, OTfl'M'IG, Rfi-fiyy HrtTc'iTSiyqre? . (^P^WhS' V^ 200 a^^TtBT fN^sn^r sCTWgfN' sn^TSRiTw^rfN' 15.7.2005 Shri N.S. Dhurundhar, Shri Yashwant Singh State. By this petition the pe of order ddted 21.6.200i application of the petiotio^ practice as Notary, Public hc^ The case of the pei appointed as Notary-Public from time to time and u petitioner moved an applica but the same was refused vi^le impu9ned order. Learned counsel for th|i raised in this petition has 4 vide order dated 24.3.2005 Chandra Prakash Sharma Vs) other connected matters di Secretary, Law & Le9islati^ q>i<if<-i41-f Hi*«nTffteczt<.RiWR ^arf^trsn^T ^ounsel for the petitioner. iThakur, ©Svt. Advocate for the fitioner has questioned the legatity (Annexure A-l) whereby the ler for renewal of certificate to s been rejected. •itioner is that initially he was or a period of three years w.e.f. 14.3.1991. Thereafer, the p^titioner's certificate was renewed timately, in the year 2005 the ion fo.r renewal of his certificate petitioner submits that the issue Iready been decided by this Court iassed in W.P.No.3247/03 between State of C.6. & others along with id the orders passed by Deputy e Affairs, 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh, Raipur have been quashed 4"d hs is directed to consider the applications for renewal of (jertificate to practice as Notary. —CiflA^fe XI-HC-22 snisT^i f^TRTSIT^T giiiwgfgtT aar lhF 3^ ^ww^, ®Tfl+l'l6,fsj!rliuy< NI*<WfSCTTSIi W^ 200 'RM Therefore,based on the order in question (Ann^xure No.2 is directed to consider for renewal of the certifilcate light of the above order With the directjoit disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. p'he above order passed by this Court A-l) is quashed and respondent the application of the petitioner to practice as Notary Pubiic in by this Court. aforesaid, the petition stands - Sdf- L.C. Bhadoo p4$sed wifa^tr wicff ^'teca')'• ^ari^iTsn^r