IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.30515 of 2009 JEETENDRA KUMAR @ JITENDRA KUMAR son of Mahesh Pd. Yadav, resident of village Bishambharpatti, P.S.-Hathauri, Distt.- Muzaffarpur. . . . . . . Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 01.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is named as one of the accused in Town, Muzaffarpur P.S. case no. 134 of 2009 registered for the offence under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120 B of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioner submits that entire allegation in the First Information Report is against Manish Kumar, Shashi Kumar and Amit Kumar. So far this petitioner is concerned, he once visited the informant in the capacity of the Supervisor of that Company to supervise the area mentioned in the duty slip where the Mobile Tower was to be installed. Petitioner’s case is that he was employed as Supervisor beyond that he has no concern with other activity. So far the realization of money is concerned that was not done by the petitioner. Considering these facts, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, the petitioner named above, will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Town, Muzaffarpur P.S. case no. 134 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Uday/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)