: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Civil Jurisdiction Civil Jurisdiction Civil Jurisdiction WRIT PETITION NO.371 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO.371 OF 2009 WRIT PETITION NO.371 OF 2009 India Games Ltd. ...Petitioner. V/s. Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.Zulphikar Jariwala i/by Thakore Jariwala & Associates , advs. for the Petitioner. Mr.M.I.Sethna, Sr.Counsel with Mr.Rajinder Kumar , advs. for the Respondent Nos.1,2 and 3. Mr.Parimal K. Shroff i/by Parimal K. Shroff & Co., advs. for the Respondent No.6. CORAM: F.I.Rebello & CORAM: F.I.Rebello & CORAM: F.I.Rebello & J.H.Bhatia,JJ J.H.Bhatia,JJ J.H.Bhatia,JJ. DATE : 15th April, 2009. DATE : 15th April, 2009. DATE : 15th April, 2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. In the instant case, there is no demand on the petitioner. Petitioner contends that the demand is made on respondent no.6. As they are licensees, they are indirectly affected by the demand. A dispute between the petitioner and the respondent no.6 would not result in passing interim orders by this Court against the respondent nos.1 to 5 where the respondent nos.1 to 5 have made no demand on the petitioner. Hence, the question of interim relief would not arise. Interim reliefs rejected. : 2 : 2. In the result, petition stands dismissed. (F.I.Rebello, J.) (F.I.Rebello, J.) (F.I.Rebello, J.) (J.H.Bhatia, J.) (J.H.Bhatia, J.) (J.H.Bhatia, J.)