IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16157 of 2009 1. NARESH MOHAN SAH S/O LATE ROHIN SAH VILL- REGANIYA, P.O. KUMARPUR, P.S. FULIDUMAR, ANCHAL- SHAMBHUGANJ, DISTT. BANKA 2. BISHWANATH SAH S/O LATE ROHIN SAH VILL- REGANIYA, P.O. KUMARPUR, P.S. FULIDUMAR, ANCHAL- SHAMBHUGANJ, DISTT. BANKA 3. SUBODH SAH @ SUBODH PRASAD SAH S/O BISHWANATH SAH VILL- REGANIYA, P.O. KUMARPUR, P.S. FULIDUMAR, ANCHAL- SHAMBHUGANJ, DISTT. BANKA 4. PROMOD SAH S/O BISHWANATH SAH VILL- REGANIYA, P.O. KUMARPUR, P.S. FULIDUMAR, ANCHAL- SHAMBHUGANJ, DISTT. BANKA 5. KAPILDEO SAH S/O BISHWANATH SAH VILL- REGANIYA, P.O. KUMARPUR, P.S. FULIDUMAR, ANCHAL- SHAMBHUGANJ, DISTT. BANKA 6. GOPAL SAH S/O BISHWANATH SAH VILL- REGANIYA, P.O. KUMARPUR, P.S. FULIDUMAR, ANCHAL- SHAMBHUGANJ, DISTT. BANKA 7. SMT. JICHHO DEVI W/O RAM KISHUN SAH VILL- REGANIYA, P.O. KUMARPUR, P.S. FULIDUMAR, ANCHAL- SHAMBHUGANJ, DISTT. BANKA 8. DEVENDRA YADAV S/O LATE LAKHAPATI YADAV VILL- REGANIYA, P.O. KUMARPUR, P.S. FULIDUMAR, ANCHAL- SHAMBHUGANJ, DISTT. BANKA 9. SMT. DROPTI DEVI W/O SHIVRAM SAH VILL- REGANIYA, P.O. KUMARPUR, P.S. FULIDUMAR, ANCHAL- SHAMBHUGANJ, DISTT. BANKA 10. MANIK KUMAR S/O SHIVRAM SAH VILL- REGANIYA, P.O. KUMARPUR, P.S. FULIDUMAR, ANCHAL- SHAMBHUGANJ, DISTT. BANKA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY REVENUE DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION, BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION, BHAGALPUR 4. THE CHAKBANDI PADADHIKARI, SHAMBHUGAN, BANKA :- Respondents 1st Set. 5. RAMDEV NARAYAN CHAUDHARY S/O LATE PANCHAM LAL VILL- KUMARPUR, P.O. KUMARPUR, P.S. FULIDUMAR, ANCHAL- SHAMBHUGANJ, DISTT. BANKA :-- Petitioner-Petitioner-Respondent 2nd Set. 6. HARDEV NARAYAN CHAUDHARY S/O LATE PANCHAM LAL VILL- KUMARPUR, P.O. KUMARPUR, P.S. FULIDUMAR, ANCHAL- SHAMBHUGANJ, DISTT. BANKA ----------- 2. 26.11.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners are the purchasers of the lands-in-question from Respondent no.6. They are aggrieved by the order of the Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna dated 25.5.2009 passed in Cons. Revision Case No. 10 of 2008, Annexure-4, whereunder learned Director has held that Chak Plot No. 372 which has been carved out from the revisional survey plot no. 219 should be recorded hanf and half in the name of Respondent nos. 5 and 6 as the said plot is not included in the share of - 2 - either Respondent No.5 or 6 in the Batwaranama referred to in the impugned order. Counsel for the petitioners states that such finding of the learned Director is an error of record as revisional survey plot no. 219 is included in the Batwaranama in the share of Respondent No.6 and to that extent the impugned order suffers from error of fact. 3. Let the petitioners invite the attention of the learned Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna towards the aforesaid error of fact and if the learned Director is satisfied after perusing the Batwaranama that revisional survey plot no. 219 is included in the share of Respondent no.6 then he shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 4. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)