IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41160 of 2010 RAKESH KUMAR SON OF BHUKHAL SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.11.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Shikarpur P.S.Case No.117 of 2010 for offence punishable under section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the submissions of the learned counsel that the bonafide of the petitioner who happens to be the husband of the deceased is manifest from the first information report itself wherein the informant has herself stated that upon getting information about the alleged occurrence, she reached the M.J.K Hospital, Bettiah where during the course of treatment, her daughter expired, let the petitioner Rakesh Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount leach to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Shikarpur P.S.Case 2 No.117 of 2010, subject to the condition that the petitioner would cooperate in the trial and would ensure his representation before the court below on each and every date fixed in the case. The failure on the part of the petitioner to ensure his representation on two consecutive dates fixed, without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the court below, would entitle the court concerned to initiate proceeding for cancellation of his bail bond and for taking him into custody. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J)