@ V G) %\52é INTHEruGHCOURTOFCHHATnseARHAT BILAsPUR (cm w.P. s No. 04 2011 / Pongram Tondon, aged about 56 years, S/o Shri Mohersai Tondon, Head Master, Government Primary School Pakariya, Biock Pamgarh, Distt. Janjgir Champa (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.) District Education V Officer, Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Biock Pamgarh, Distt.Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA PETITIONER /' :1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department E§2év HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR (Writ Petition underArticle 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :— tShri K.S. Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner. - Shri Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State. Gowri ORDER ORAL (Passed on this 3 day of February, 201,1) Heard learned counsel for the parties. a By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and provide benefit of FR 22 (D) of the Chhattisgarh Fundamentai Rules for grant of increments, as provided under the rules and also to pay arrears from the date when it became due. At the very outset, learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the identicai matter has already been considered .and decided by this COurt vide order dated 27—3-2008 in W.P. (S) No.4991 of 2006 and the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the said decision. Learned counsel appearing for the State does not dispute that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the order-passed by this Court in W.P. (S) No.4991 of 2006. Learned counsel further submits ' that if the petitioner tiles fresh representation before the concerned authorities for the reliefs, which he has claimed by way of this petition, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, subject to verification of facts. For the foregoing reasons, the instant petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to make a freSh representation before the respondent authorities raising all of his grievances raised in this petition and on such representation being made, the respondent authorities shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law and on its own merits. within a‘period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge a «on-~— WRIT PETITION (S) NO.649 OE 2011 PETITIONER Pongram Tondon Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & Others