IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH JULY 2011 / 22ND ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 13408 of 2010(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- WIRELESS-TT INFO SERVICES LIMITED, REGISTERED OFFICE AT 5-9-62, 5TH FLOOR, KHAN LATEEF KHAN ESTATE KLK ESTATE, FATEH MAIDAN ROAD, HYDERABAD, 500001 AND CIRCLE OFFICE AT J & CO. CHAMBERS, MANIMALA ROAD, EDAPPALLY, COCHIN-24. THROUGH ITS AUTH.SIGN.MR.SUDEVAN V.D. BY ADV. SRI.A.MOHAMED MUSTAQUE SRI.T.PRAVEEN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE S.I OF POLICE PALA POLICE STATION KOTTAYAM DIST. 2. K.S.SURESH, KOTHAMANGALTH HOUSE, ARUNAPURAM P.O., PALA, KOTTAYAM DIST. 3. V.R. RAJESH, VADAKKANATTU, ARUNAPURAM P.O., PALA, KOTTAYAM DIST. 4. PRASHANTH, ELIKKUZHIYIL, ARUNAPURAM P.O., PALA, KOTTAYAM DIST. 5. JAYAPRAKASH, ARYAPPARA, ARUNAPURAM P.O., PALA, KOTTAYAM DIST. 6. ULLAS, ARYAPPARA, ARUNAPURAM P.O., PALA, KOTTAYAM DIST. WP(C).No. 13408 of 2010 7. SURESH, ARYAPPARA, ARUNAPURAM P.O., PALA, KOTTAYAM DIST. 8. VINOD, ARYAPPARA, ARUNAPURAM P.O., PALA, KOTTAYAM DIST. 9. M.D.JOSEPH, MEDAYIL HOUSE, ARUNAPURAM P.O., PALA, KOTTAYAM DIST. ADV. SRI.S.PRASANTH FOR R2-6 & 8 GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.T.K.VIPINDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: dmb WP(C).No. 13408 of 2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 8.01.2010 EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE PERMIT DATED 19.02.2010 ISSUED BY PALA MUNICIPALITY EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE REQUEST MADE BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 12.04.2010 EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE ACKOWLEDGEMENT OF EXT.P3 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- EXT.R2(a):- COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE REPSONDENTS BEFORE THE R.D.O PALA EXT.R2(b):- COPY OF THE O.S.NO.100/2010 BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, PALA //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE dmb PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ---------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.13408 OF 2010 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of July, 2011 JUDGMENT PIUS C. KURIAKOSE ,J. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and respondents 2 to 9. The construction of the tower has already completed. There may not be serious opposition to the energisation so submitted the petitioner's counsel. We notice that the issue is covered in favour of the petitioner company by judgment of this court in Essar Telecom Infrastructure (P) Ltd v. State of Kerala (2011 (2) KLT 516). Under the above circumstances, we dispose of the writ petition directing the first respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner against the obstruction if any caused by respondents 2 to 9 or their men in the matter of energisation of the mobile tower which stands already constructed on the strength of Ext.P2. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE. C.K.ABDUL REHIM JUDGE dmb