8 u g I ’Mbn hYi-;‘ In. n m... _ H _ XI-HC-78 a w , m , m . 5y? VFW ”4 mm @D .\ mm (W) mmm WWW WW§§Q§W' waxwm asmm Soma 30-8-2006 Mr. Vishnu Koshta, couns al for the petitioner. Mr. Satish Gupta, Deputy Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents, on advance copy. Heard both the caunsel. By the instant writ petitiun under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india,‘ the petitioner has chaiienged his transfer order dated 29-7-2006 (Annexure P—2) passed by respondent No.3. whereby he has been transferred from Middie Schooi, Abhanpur to Primary Schooi, Aalkanhar, Biock:Koyiibeda, ' n made under the rationaiization scheme. Ciause 7 of the rationaiizatio scheme provides for an appeai by the aggrieved person. v b The said transfer has Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already preferred an appeal be re respondent No.2 on 4-8-2006 and that appeal is not being decided by espondent No.2, therefore, respondent No.2 be directed to decide the appea to which learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents has no objecti n, Having heard learned cou sel for the parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the ase, respondent No.2 is directed to decide - the appeal of the petitioner with 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with l w. With the direction aforesa ,the petition‘stands disposed of. Consequently, M.(W.)P.N .3553f2006 also stands dispose l Sdl- L.C. Bhadoo Judge r a / wrTi '’4 e i i