IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 17576 of 2008 Between: 1 Vanchanagiri Satish Kumar S/o. Kumara Swamy 2 Vanchanagiri Murali Krishna S/o. Sammaiah 3 Vanchanagiri Sampath Kumar S/o. Kumara Swamy 4 Vanchanagiri Kishore Kumar S/o. Kumara Swamy 5 Vanchanagiri Sammaiah S/o. Kanakaiah All are R/o. h.No. 16-3-462, Ekashila Nagar, Hanumakonda, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Jangaon, Warangal District. 2 The Tahsildar, Raghunathpalli Mandal, Warangal District. 3 Pokala Shivakumar @ Shivudu S/o. Shankaraiah R/o. Raghunathpalli Village and Mandal, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in entertaining the Appeal No.36/2008 ﬁled by the 3rd respondent inspite of the declaration suits ﬁled by the 3rd respondent as well as the petitioners herein in O.S.No. 25/2008 on the ﬁle of the Senior Civil Judge, Warangal District and O.S.No. 89/2007 on the ﬁle of the Senior Civil Judge Jangaon in respect of the land to an extent of Ac.7-25 gts in Sy.No. 271/3 of Komalla Village, Raghunathpali Mandal, Warangal District illegal and void and opposed to Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Cxonstitution of India and consequently to direct the revenue authorities not to entertain any revenue proceedings in respect of the land in question till the disposal of the Civil Suits, pending before the Civil Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MUMMANENI.SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.17576 OF 2008 ORAL ORDER: The petitioners ﬁled the present writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the ﬁrst respondent in entertaining the Appeal No. 36/2008 preferred by the third respondent herein, despite pendency of civil suits bearing O.S.Nos.89 of 2007 on the ﬁle of the Senior Civil Judge, Jangaon and O.S.No.25 of 2008 on the ﬁle of the Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, ﬁled by the petitioners as well as the third respondent herein, in respect of the land to an extent of Ac.7.25 guntas in Survey No.271/3 situated at Komalla Village, Raghunathpally Mandal, Warangal District, as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently to direct the revenue authorities not to entertain any applications in respect of the land in question till the disposal of the said civil suits. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. The grievance of the petitioner is that the ﬁrst respondent cannot entertain the appeal ﬁled by the third respondent for cancellation of the pattadar pass books because the civil suits filed by the petitioner as well as the third respondent in respect of the land in question are pending before the Courts where they are filed. As of now, the ﬁrst respondent has merely entertained the appeal and has not passed any order, and it is too premature to contend that the ﬁrst respondent would pass orders cancelling the pattadar pass books. However, the petitioner is at liberty to raise all the objections, which he sought to raise in the writ petition, before the ﬁrst respondent, in which event, the ﬁrst respondent shall certainly take the same into consideration. Accordingly, with the above observations, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. ______________ N.V.RAMANA, J. Date: 13.08.2008 VGSR