- ^' f. HSGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH: BILASPU_R Writ Petition (si No. 2620 of 2007 Petitioners 1) Prafful Kumar Kawde, aged about 43 years, S/o. Shrui Bartu Ram Kawde, Assistant Teacher, Primary Schooi Bhaisgaon. 2) Sona Ram Wadde, aged about 37 years, S,'o. Shri Dheiu Ram, Assistant Teacher, Primary Schooi Dhantulsi/ 3) Manohar Singh Mandavi, aged about 44 years, S/o. Shri Baldev Mandavi, Assistant Teacher, Primary School Sumia Mudpar. 4) Smt. Rubi Datta Rai, Aged about 51 years, Wto. Shri Pradeep Kumar Rai, Assistant Teacher, Primary Giris Schooi Kanker. All are at Block Kanker, Dist. Kanker, CG. Versus 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Schoo! Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, CG. 2) The Director, Public Instruction Department, Raipur, CG 3) District Education Officer, Kanker District Kanker, CG. 4) Block Educatibn Officer, Kanker, CG. 5) Trsasury & Funds Department, Kanker, CG Respondents (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India ). (SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Satish K. Agnihotri) PRESENT: Shri D.K. Prajapati, counse! for the petitioners. Ku. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyerfor the State. ^ ORAL ORDER (Passed on 1 May 2007) The question of law involved herein as to whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale with effect from the date of initial appointment or from the date of compietion of probation period. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioners as well as for the State/respondents jolntly submit that the facts and question of law involved in the present writ petition are the same to that of in Writ Petition (S) No. 5976 of 2006 (Sushi! Tiwari & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & others), whichwas altowed vide order dated 7-11-2006. In view of the above stated submission made by learned counsel for th? parties, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms. No order as to costs. Raju Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge