BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Seventeenth day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14615 of 2011 1. KARRUPPASAMY 2. VELLAI @ MARI 3. PARI 4. MARI 5. MANICKAM 6. J.K.ALAGENDRAN 7. RAJA 8. ANNAMALAI 9. VEILUMUTHU 10.VAIRAVAN 11.MURUGAN 12.ILANGOVAN 13.ASAITHAMBI : PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs. THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUPUVANAM POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.343/2011 : RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. K.VINAYAGAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr. K.S.DURAIPANDIAN Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are accused in Cr.No.343 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148 of I.P.C and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act. Apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, the petitioners are before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 3. According to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners have involved in the offence said to have been committed by them under Sections 147, 148 of I.P.C and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act. He would further submit that the names of the petitioners have not been found in the FIR and they are unnamed persons and they are law abiding citizens and they have not committed any offence. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ that this Court has granted anticipatory bail to the co-accused, who were standing in the similar footing in Crl.O.P.No.14538 and 14681 of 2011 on 12.11.2011. He would further submit that the petitioners may also be granted anticipatory bail on the same lines. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that there is no previous case against the petitioners and they are unnamed accused persons in the FIR. He would further submit that suitable conditions may be imposed in the event of granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. I have considered the above submissions. I could see that in this case, except one accused, namely the first accused, all other co- accused have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court on 12.11.2011. Asfar as this case is concerned, the petitioners are standing on the same footing with that of the accused persons, who were granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid petition. Therefore, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, on the same lines. 7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai, on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall remain at Madurai and report before the Karuppayurani police station every day at 10.30 a.m for a period of four weeks. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. Sd/- 17/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAMADURAI. 2. -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUPUVANAM POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 5. THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, KARUPPAYURANI POLICE STATION, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/S. K.VINAYAGAN Advocate SR.No.40090 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14615 of 2011 NSV/21.11.11/2P/7C Date :17/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/