IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.8483 of 2008 ABDUL RAHMAN, son of Shaikh Gulab, resident of village-Panka, Police Station-Azamnagar, District-Katihar. ……Petiitoner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Supreindendent of Police, Katihar. 3. Asamul, son of Shaikh Gulab 4. Shaukat, son of Asamul 5. Raheba Khatoon, wife of Asamul 6. Gulab Rabbani @ Gulam Rabbani, son of Hanif 7. Zaharul, son of Shaikh Gulab 8. Banu Khatoon, wife of Zaharul 9. Chhabi Khatoon @ Mangani Khatoon, daughter of Zaharul 10. Dilawar, son of Shaikh Gulab 11. Naimuddin, son of Elahi Bux 12. Jahajun Khatoon, wife of Naimuddin. All residents of village-Panka, Police Station-Azamnagar, District- Katihar. ……..Opposite Parties ----------- 02. 01.02.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. The counsel for the petitioner challenges the order dated 30.07.2007 by which cognizance has been taken under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant is the second son of the petitioner. The First Information Report has been instituted against ten persons. However the charge sheet was finally submitted against the father of the deceased. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge sheet has been submitted on imaginary ground and only on the direction of the Superintendent of 2 Police. It is further submitted that a protest petition has also been filed in this case by the informant. All these aspects of the matter will be considered at the appropriate stage. At the present, I am not inclined to interfere with the order of the cognizance. The application stands dismissed. Shageer (Sheema Ali Khan, J)