IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2467 of 2010. Decided on: May 31, 2010. Ram Singh ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. ….. Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner Mr. H.R. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Addl. AG for respondent No.1. Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. Mr. Rakesh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The Writ Petition is filed with the following prayer: “i) That the writ of Mandamus may be issued to the respondents to consider the petitioner for the appointment in the grade of peon or clerk on the basis of maximum working in the grade of peon or clerk with all consequential benefits.” 2. According to the petitioner, his case is covered by the decision of the Apex Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. It is seen that the petitioner has submitted Annexure P-2, representation. It is for the second respondent to consider the matter. Therefore, there will be a direction to the second respondent to consider Annexure P-2, representation in the light of the judgment referred to above and any other relevant materials and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of the production of copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment referred to in this petition. 2 3. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Copy Dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. May 31, 2010. ( Justice Rajiv Sharma), (karan/vs) Judge.