IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6292 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 28, 2010 Gurbachan Singh and another …Petitioners Versus State Bank of Patiala and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 05.06.2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sangrur, whereby application moved by the petitioners – third party, seeking impleadment under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C., was rejected. Bank has filed suit against the defendants for recovery of the amount. Petitioners – third party has moved an C.R. No. 6292 of 2010 application seeking impleadment in the suit for recovery against the borrower contending therein that property mortgaged belongs to the petitioners – third party, which was wrongly mortgaged by the defendants. Defendants were not authorized, having no title over the property, to mortgage it. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that since defendants have played fraud with the bank, as well as, with the petitioners by mortgaging the property of the petitioners, hence, petitioners are having remedy of filing FIR, as well as, civil suit challenging the mortgage, he seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail other remedies available under the law. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to avail other legal remedies available under the law for redressal of their grievances. September 28, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2