IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1396 of 2008 SHREE MOHAN PRASAD Versus SHREE SHIVA KUMAR PRASAD & ORS ----------- 4 23/9/2008 Heard counsel for the4 petitioner. In the opinion of this Court when the amendment was allowed in the plaint on 10.9.2003 the additional written statement could not have been entertained in respect of the aforementioned amended portion of the plaint on 15.1.2007. Added to it, it is finding of the court below in the impugned order that it was initially the petitioner who had made amendment in the written statement by filing additional written statement on 9.4.2003 on account of which such amendment in the plaint was made. The court below was therefore of the view and in my opinion rightly so that there is actually no requirement for additional pleading by permitting the petitioner to file yet another additional written statement. That being so, this Court would 2 hold that such prayer of the petitioner is absolutely misconceived and accordingly, this application is dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar