IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 12246 of 2008. Decided on 7th April, 2011. _____________________________________________________ Sushil Kumar. …Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. V.D. Khidta, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): In sequel to order dated 10th March, 2011, Mr. R.P. Singh, learned Assistant Advocate General has placed on record copy of mandays chart of the petitioner. A bare perusal of the same reveals that the petitioner has worked for 41 days in 1989. Thereafter, he has worked continuously w.e.f. 1990 and completed 10 years’ continuous service with 240 days in each calendar year up to 1999. However, the services of the petitioner have been regularized as Mechanic/Fitter on 3rd December, 2002 instead of immediately after completion of 10 years’ continuous service w.e.f. 1990, as per the law laid down by their Lordships of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, 1994 Supp.(2) SCC 316. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. No. - 2 - 2. Consequently, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner for regularization immediately after completion of 10 years’ continuous service with all consequential benefits, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge April 07, 2011. (bhupender) - 3 - `