HIGH GQURT OF CHH TTISG5ARH AT BILASPUR MGC. No. 258 of 2007 Birendra Kumar Dewangan Sic: SM Gane$h Ram Dewangan, aged about 22 years, Occupaiion Student af LLB. Part H, Govt. Coilege Dhamatari (C.G.) Resident of Near Neham school Tikrapai’a Ward, Dhanatari Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.) Pemioner Ver5u$ Resgondents 1. State of Chhattissgarh Through the Secretai'y, Scheduled Tribe & ScheduledCast Department. D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) H The Cotleetor Dhamatari— Diet. Dhamatari (0G,) 3. Tahsiidar Dhamatari District Dhamatari (C.G.) Laia Ram Pawar 5/0 Late Shri Binduiai By Cast- Bya-Mahra, Wcrking as Peon in the Municipal Office Dhamatari, Dist. Dhamatari (C.G.) Resident of Neat Neharu Schooi‘ Tikrapare Ward Dhamatari Dist. Dhamatari (C G) 4. Rajesh Pawar 3/6 ehri Lara Ram 5. Pawar. Kumari Rejni Dlo Shri Lela Ram Pawar, Umesh Pawar Sfo Shri Leia Ram Pawar UdhoRam Sic Late Shri Bindu Lat Pawer Bry Caste Baya 9, Ku. Purnima Pawar Dio Shri Udho Ram 10. Ku. Poonam Pawar D/a $hri Udho Ram 11. Ku Soniya Pawar Dr‘o Shri Udho Ram 12. Ku. Chanda Pawar D/o Shri Udho Ram 13. Tameshwar Pawar Die Shri Udho Ram 14. Dameshwar Pawar S/o Shri Udho Ram 15. Medan Pawar Sir) Late Shri Bindu Lei Pawar By Cast Baya 16. Ku. Savita Pawar Dlo Shri Madan Pawar Ku. Geetanjali Pawar Die Shri Madan Pawar Nileehwar Pawar S/o Shri Madan/ 18. N m / X by Caste~Bya and Resident of near (Appiication for modificatian of Qrder dateti 23.4.2007) 5ingie Bench: Hon‘bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri: J, Present : Shn’ R.S. Patel, counsel for the petitioner. Shn‘ Arvind Dubey, Panel iawyer for the Siaie. ORDER (Passed on 2nd August, 2007) i. A. N001 (i) This is an appiication for exemptim of fiiirag certified copy of the impugned order tiered 25.04.2007 and copy of the petition with return. The aopiication is ordered as prayed for. (2) Learned couneei appearing for the petitioner submits that in the order dated 2$.04.2007 pa$sed in W.P.(C) No. 2344/2007 in the fifth iine of Para 2 Scheduied Tribe ”(ST)" has wrongly been typed as it shouid be $eheduied Castes ”(SQ)" and further in the sixth iine "‘S.T." has been typed as the same shouid be "S.C". in Para 3, by mistake it appears that, again ”ST.“ has been typed in the ninth iine in place of "S.C.". (3) On perusal of the papers. it appears that the typographicat error, as has been pointed out by the learned oounsei for the petitioner, is correct. The same he amended accordingiy. ln the fifth line of Para 2 int place of "$.T.“ it ehouid be read as "SC." and in the sixth line of the same Para in place of "ST.“ it should be read as SC Again in the ninth tine of Para 3 "ST.“ be read as "S.C.". «' (4) The Registry is directed to make necessary am$ndmerats in the $ ordai‘ dated 26th April, 2007 passed in W.P.(C) No. 2344I2OD7. (5) This appiication is disposed of accordingly. (6) Certified copy 0f the amended judgment and order dated 26th April, 2007 in W.P.(C) No. 2344/2007 be issued a5 per ruies. Sci/— i ’Satish K.Agnihotri Judge - ; g