IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 8TH AUGUST 2008 / 17TH SRAVANA 1930 WP(C).No. 22936 of 2008(E) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- P.K. JANARDHANAN, S/O. SANKUNNI MENON, 4/73, KANDANCHEMMARATH HOUSE, AYINKALAM.P.O, THAVANOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. 2. E.K. PRADEEP, S/O. NARAYANAN, ELAYINGAL HOUSE, POLPAKARA.P.O, EDAPPAL. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON FOR R2 GOVT.PLEADER SRI.K.V.MANOJ KUMAR FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.22936/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE RTA MALAPPURAM DT 23.9.2006 GRANTING VARIATION OF PERMIT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THEJUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NO.15946/08 DT 9.7.2008. EXT.P3: TRUE COPYOF THE RELEVANT PORTION REGARDING THE CONSIDERATION OF THE APPLICATION OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN THE MEETING HELD ON 12.4.2007 ITEM NO.3. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE FOR TIMING CONFERENCE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 19.7.2008 PUBLISHED ON 23.7.2008. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT 28.7.2008. EXTS. OF R2 EXT.R2(a): TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DT 7.8.2007. EXT.R2(b): TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.466/2008. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 22936 OF 2008 E ==================== Dated this the 8th day of August, 2008 J U D G M E N T In this writ petition, being prima facie satisfied that the petitioner's priority was overlooked, an order dated 29th of July, 2008 was passed directing that the 1st respondent shall not settle the timing of the 2nd respondent earlier to that of the petitioner. It is now pointed out by the counsel for the petitioner and the 2nd respondent that timing conference in so far as both of them are concerned, is scheduled to be held on 20/8/08. In view of this, the grievance of the writ petitioner stands redressed. 2. The writ petition is therefore disposed of directing that the timing of both the petitioner and the 2nd respondent shall be settled in the timing conference now scheduled on 20/8/2008. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp