Ci^ / 00 IN THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. CHHATTISGARH At BILASPUR Writ Petition (s) No. ^'?><S.5 /2006 PETITIONER \ob^.." .^••""JCl..''" >^ ^^^•"^ ^R^?.g:-""...--"' ./••" ^••;"L -•" ..*'^2, ^** ^^ ^^^' ^.-•- RESPONDENTS ^^ ^ D. L. Prajapati y S/o Shri. Sadhuram Prajapati, Aged about 53 Years, Employed as Data Assistant, O/o E & M, H.E.M., Sub-Division -I Water Resources Department, Darri' Residing at: A-1/25, Irrigatioa Colony, DARRI (P.O.)-Jamnipali, District: Korba (CG). Versus ^^ ,^» ^/sy*'^^ jj '/c, ~rt\ fi< . .^' ^,' /, ^- iVh ^. . ^ ^s' /. '^^>-s^€/ ^c.^sy State ofChhattisgarh / Through: The Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralaya, RAIPUR - 491002 (CG) The Engineer-in-Chief ^ Water Resources Department, SihawaBhawan, Civil Lines, RAIPUR-492001 (CG) The ChiefEngineer, ^ Mahanadi Project, Raipur Water Resources Department, S.R.P.Chowk, ShankarNagarRoad, RAIPUR-492001 (CG) The Superintending Engineerc E & M Division, Water Resources Department, RAIPUR- 492001 The Executive Engineer,/ E&M,Heavy Equipment Division, Water Resources Deptt. BILASPUR The Sub-DivisionaI Officer, ^ E&M, FOM, Water Resources Deptt. Sub-Division, BILASPUR WKIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY^MANDAMUS^ETC, HIGH GQURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR •3»- S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISHK. AGNIHOTRI. J. ..\ Petitioner WRITPETITION (S.) N0.- 69 OF 2006 D.L. Prajapati versus Respondents State ofChhattisgarh aadothers Present : Mr. B.P.Rao, counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on 6 ofSeptember, Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to grant of two higher pay-scales (Kramonnati) in accordance with memo dated 14-1-2003 (Annexure P-2) of the General Administration Department, Govemment ofChhattisgarh. 2. The petitioner, at this stage, confines his prayer to making a representation to the concemed autiiorities for deciding his case in accordance with the memo dated 14-1-2003 (Annexure P-2), on its own merit, for grant of two higher pay-scales (Kramormati), to which leamed eounsel appearing for fhe respondents/State has no objection. 3. On such representation being made, the same may be considered, in accordance wifh law, on its own merit, witbin a period of eight weeks from the receipt of a copy of the represenlation. 4. With the above-stated pbservation, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Cerrified copy as per rules. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge f^ -<.-'-- Gopal