IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1612 OF 2005 PETITION NO.1612 OF 2005 PETITION NO.1612 OF 2005 Cholai S.Vishwakarma ..Petitioner Vs. The Collector, Mumbai Suburban District & Ors. ....Respondents Mr. Rajesh Gehani, for the Petitioner Mr. M. More, AGP for respondent No.1. Mr.G.D. Utangale, for the respondent No.2. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. DATE: 25th SEPTEMBER 2006 P.C. . On behalf of the respondent No.5 learned Counsel makes a statement that both the tenements have been allotted to eligible slum dweller after following the lottery system. Considering that the order in so far as those tenements are concerned stands recalled. 2. In so far as the petitioner is concerned, it is submitted that B- and C Wings of the building are yet to be constructed. The petitioners claim being eligible slum dweller will be considered while allotting either B-Wing or C-Wing which are yet to be constructed based upon lottery system. With the above observation petition stands disposed of. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) REBELLO, J.) (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.)