$ING§LE 3EN£H IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIomsmo. LSD$% /2011 /, PETITIONER : G.P. Pradhan, S/o. late Shri Pandav Pradhan, Aged about 56 t \W 9‘W years, R/o. Village Sariya .w ””“I Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS " RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: — Secretary, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) / 2. Director, Revenue Department, Rajpur (C.G.) 3./ Commissioner Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. / Collector, Land Record, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COI IRT OF CHHATJ‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 5083 of2011 G.P.Pradhan. VER S1 IS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICI ,F‘. 226 OF THE CONSTITI JTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’hle Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Saurahh Dangi, Advocate for the petition er. Shxi V.V.S. Moorlhy, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondems. Shri S.P. Navralna, Dy. Commissioner (R), Bilaspur, is present. ORDER ORAL) (Passed on 06 day of September, 201 1) 1. At. the very outset, Shri Moorthy, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents, on instmctions, submits that the order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexure P/ l) impugted herein, has not been passed by a. competem. authority in accordance with Rule 20, Part II, of the Madhya Pradesh/Chhattisgarh Land Record Manual, thug the same it; unsustainable in law and shall not be given effect tot 2. In View of the above submission made by learned State counsel, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication at this stage. 3. Accordingly, the impugied order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexure P/l) is quashed. However, liberty is reserved to the State/respondents to pass appropriate order, if so advised, in accordance with law, in administrative exigency and in public interest. 4. The writ. petition is allowed. No order asto costs. IL __WM we, -ww...‘ Sd/— sATISH K. ANGNIHORI Judge