IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27914 of 2010 RAM JHULAN UPADHYAY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02. 05.08.2010 This modification application has been filed with a prayer for modifying this Court’s order dated 25.08.2009, whereby Cr.W.J.C. No. 330 of 2009 was dismissed. The instant petitioner was a petitioner in that writ. While passing the said order dated 25.08.2009, this Court considered Annexure-6 of that case (Cr.W.J.C. No. 330 of 2009). Today learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the contents of Annexure-6 which was filed by himself in that Cr.W.J.C. No.330 of 2009 was not correct and that the situation was some what else and that, therefore, learned counsel says that the order be modified in the light of the materials as stated in Annexure-1 to the modification petition. Annexure-6 to the Cr.W.J.C. No.330 of 2009 was filed by the petitioner himself and he required this Court to pass an order on the basis of that annexure and accordingly this Court passed the said order dated 25.08.2009. Now by bringing a 2 different paper vide annexure-1 to the petition the petitioner says that the statement at Annexure-6 to Cr.W.J.C. No.330 of 2009 was not correct, hence Cr.W.J.C. No.330 of 2009 be heard and considered again and the order be modified. In my view this is neither permissible nor justified at this stage, hence, this modification application is dismissed. Mkr. (C.M. Prasad, J.)