IGH coum' OF cHHA'r'rIsGARH AT mnmrun p4s; no. 7575/2007 Rameshwar Lal Dh1mar, 5/0 Late Shn Mangtu Ram Dhnnar, Aged about 55 years, R10 Gandhinagar, Near Dcvanga Mandir, Gudhiyaii, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ‘ Versus Fdod Corpdmtion of India, Through Managihg n Director; head Quarter—New Delhi, 16—20 Bamkhamba lane, New Delhi The Executive Diracto’r, Food. Corporatxon of Indm Dhira] Arma Bmldmg, Near Anant Kanckar Pohce Stanon, Bandra (East) Mnmbai 400051‘ The General Manager, Food Corporau'on of India, Ring Road Chouxaha Talibandhn Ralpur, Chhatusgarh The Alea Manager, Food Comoratlon of India, Madeena Butldmg, Jall Road Ralur, ‘ Chham'sgarh ‘ ma The Employees Pmvident Fund Thmugh < Commlsswner Reglonal O$ce, Orgamzaton, 8and 9th Floor, Mayur Bhawan, Connaught Cucus, New Delh1—1 on UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE conswrtmou o‘F INDIA (SB Hon’ble Mr [satish K. Agnihotri, J) hn Pankaj Shmastava, counsel for the peuuoner hn B P Gupta counsel for the respondents No 1 to 4 _ 0m ORDER (Fused on this 2nd day of Jamiary 2008) i _ earned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petmoner does not want to press thls peuuon on ments except that the euuoner be penmtted to make a representatmn In terms of the / i I / ‘ I , l H , m n PETITIONER RESPONDENTS p wan pmm S S L p / order dated 24.10.2007 passed by this Court in "W.P. No. 302f 2007 (R.B.Uikey Vs’. Food Corporau'on of India and Others). 2. Shri B.P.Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1 to 4 have no objection. 3. The penhon 1s accordmgly disposed oi m the same terms a dr “Accordingly, it is djmcted that if so advised, the petitioner may tile é detailed representation below” Iespondent No 1 along with a copy of this order and a copy of the Wnt Pennon w1th1n a penod of 3 weeks 1mm today and 1f such a representanon ls nled and the‘ concerned documents of the petitioner have not been forwarded by respondent No.1 ‘ to respondent - No.5, respondent No. 1,‘ in « turn, shall examme (the points raised by the petitioner and forward the papers relating to the pension of the petitioner to respondent No 5 Within a period oi 6O days non: the date of receipt of the said representahon or shall dlspose oi the Iepxesentatton in accordance With law W1thm the said penod In case the concerned documents of the pennoner are already iorwarded this order shall carry no force Sdl- Satish-K.A“ "h'otri Judgee Suguna 6 s une l’ p