- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CONTINUNATION SHEET CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1344 OF 2004 APPEAL NO.1344 OF 2004 APPEAL NO.1344 OF 2004 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 19, 2006. : AUGUST 19, 2006. : AUGUST 19, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocates for the parties on the prayer for grant of leave to prefer an Appeal. 2. By the impugned Judgment and Order the Respondents-accused have been acquitted of the offence under section 498-A read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. After having heard the Advocates for the parties and after perusing the impugned Judgment and Order, I find that the view taken by the learned Trial Judge is a possible view which could have been taken on the basis of material on record. The learned Counsel for the Respondents pointed out that the F.I.R. was lodged as - 2 - a result of matrimonial dispute between the first Respondent and complainant. He pointed out that by order dated 11th May 2005 there has been overall settlement between the complainant and the first Respondent and decree of divorce by mutual consent has been passed. 3. Considering all these factors, no case is made out for grant of leave. Appeal is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE