IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44489 of 2009 1. MANOJ KUMAR MANDAL 2. AJAY KUMAR MANDAL 2. SUNIL KUMAR MANDAL ---------------------- PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that hardly it could be a case for cheque bouncing even after acceptance of complainant’s version though there was no dues rather amount was in security and purposely that was got bounced when there was no amount in petitioners’ account. After elapse of limitation nature of the offence cannot be diverted for section 406 IPC. Business transaction in between the parties is admitted. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in Complaint Case 2 No. 1174C/2008, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)