1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.135 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2962 OF 2006 [DECIDED ON 28.3.2007] H.H. Maharaja Udaysingh Bhonsale s/o Late H.H. Maharaja Pratapsingrao Bhonse versus Vijay Tulsiramji Dangre - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : May 06, 2010 . Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By this petition, the petitioner seeks action against the respondent under the Contempt of Court's Act 1971 for breach of the terms of the compromise which was entered into between the parties on 28.3.2007. It is brought to the notice of this court that in the order dated 28.3.2007 in Criminal Application No.838/2007, this court recorded that the parties admitted the terms of the compromise petition and hence the criminal application was disposed of in terms of the compromise. According to the petitioner the terms of the compromise were not fulfilled by the respondent and the respondent had committed the contempt. During the pendency of the contempt petition, the respondent paid an amount of Rs.10,000/- to the petitioner on 7.4.2010 and also undertook to pay an amount of Rs.20,00,000/- on 16.4.2010. Shri Shareef, the learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the respondent has paid the sum of Rs.30,00,000/- to the petitioner during the pendency of the petition. 2 With the payment of Rs.30,00,000/-, it appears that the respondent has purged the contempt, if any. Shri Shareef the learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the payment of amount of Rs.30,00,000/- by the respondent fully satisfies the claim of the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid position, the contempt petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE smp