IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 45 OF 2006. CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 45 OF 2006. CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 45 OF 2006. WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 263 of 2008. CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 263 of 2008. CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 263 of 2008. Vijay Sudhakar Shinde ..Applicant. Vs. Ramesh Vishnu Samel ..Respondent. Mr S. K. Shinde with Sagar Kasar, Advocates, for the Applicant. Mrs P. P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent-State. Mr D. S. Gharat with N. T.Gangurde, Advocate for the Complainant. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM: V.C.DAGA, J. DATED: 04.07.2008. DATED: 04.07.2008. DATED: 04.07.2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: ---- ---- ---- 1. Mentioned, not on board. 2. Heard. Perused application. 3. The Original complainant - applicant has filed the Criminal Application with a request to record compromise between the parties and to compound the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 since he has received the entire amount. The learned counsel for the applicant alongwith applicant himself stand by the statement made in the application. In this view of the matter, the offence committed by the original-accused, revision petitioner under Section 138 of the N.I.Act stands compounded and accordingly the revision application is disposed of. 4. In view of this order, the conviction of the accused would not survive. With the result, original accused would be entitled to be released forthwith, if not required in any other offence or crime. 5. Revision Application No. 45 of 2006 stands disposed of. 6. Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE