IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9964 of 2003 RAM NANDAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ****** 8 04.12.2008 The petitioner having superannuated, steps have been taken to realize certain excess payments made to him. It was said that he was paid Rs. 56,983/- in excess as GPF and Rs. 8,464/- as unutilized earned leave in excess. The petitioner challenges that these amounts have been arbitrarily fixed without notice to the petitioner. In the counter affidavit, it has been categorically stated and not denied in any rejoinder that petitioner was himself a Accounts Clerk who being so, had drawn up his own bills and accordingly the bills being erroneously drawn up, deductions were ordered. Similarly, petitioner has now annexed Annexure-3 which is Annexure-E to the counter affidavit which again points out how erroneously the petitioner’s salary was fixed. As a consequence whereof, the petitioner was liable to refund Rs. 35,419/-. These are the only three demands against the petitioner. Petitioner has not been able to show that the payments as made to him earlier or as fixed by him were correct or that the amounts now being sought to be deducted are wrong. In that view of the matter, I find no reason for interfering in this matter. The writ application is accordingly dismissed. Anand ( Navaniti Prasad Singh )