HEGH ;C$URT 9F CHHATTESGARH AT BILASPUR. ’LE SHRI JUSTICE SATISH K. AGE‘HHO‘TRI SB : HONB “LP. KG. §S3 1%4‘7i009 2 Avinash Gujnal, son of Shn’ B.M.Gunja}, agsd about 5O yaars, r/o. Shriram Nagar, RaimwCG) PETwmzm eR State (if Chhatfisgarh, Ithroug‘h 'the Secretaiy, Labour Deparnant, Mantralaya, D.K.S.Bhawa11, Raipur (CG) Labour Commissioner, naa Bottle House, Shanker Nagar, Raipur {CG} RESPONDETS N VWRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF HE TUTION OF ’INDIA Agearance: g ' Dr.‘ N.K.Shuk1a, Sr. Aavocate with Ms. Rim Mishra, couassl for the petitiongr. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawym‘ for m6 State. ./ ORAL ORDER (1 1.04.2009) With the cansent of learned counsel appealng for the parties, the petition is heard finaily. By this petition, the petitioner‘does not impugn an order, however, on aprehegeion that his promotion may be declared as illegal promotion, has filed this petition seeing a direction that the romotion of the petitioner may e 2, x p h r T CONSTI i p y k p b treated as regular promotion W.e.f. 11. 10.2001 as per order elated 11. 10.2001 '(Ailnexur’e P/ 1). Learned counsel submits that the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 23.12.2008 (Annexm‘e P/3) whereby procegsion for promotion of other employees has been merrtioned. Promotion of the petitioner is not a§ected as no subsiantial order has been passed. 3. The petitioner has not receivecl any notice or any ortier indicating that earlier order dated 11.10.2001 is under review or under consideration afresh for promotion or the same has been quaehed. However, the petitioner has rushed to this Court seeking quashjng of the order dated 23.12.2008. 4. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, perused the pleadings and documents appended thereto. The order‘ dated 23.12.2008, which has been impugned herein, ie an order whereby a process for promotions has been stated. The order is innocuous and does not aifect the promotion order of the petitioner. Acordingly, the petition is dismissed. as premature, at this stage. / Sd/- ‘ Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge ‘ t t Suguna i