IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-35552 of 2010 Date of Decision: 05.01.2011 Binder Singh and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. P.S. Jammu, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG Haryana 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 149 dated 29.7.2010 under Section 307/323/148/149 IPC and Section 25/54/59 of Arms Act registered at Police Station Kalanwali, District Sirsa. Learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that petitioners were not named in the FIR and their name came into light on the basis of disclosure statement made by Baljinder Singh, Gursewak Singh @ Mithu, Darshan Singh. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further argued that even in the disclosure statement no role has been attributed to the petitioners except that petitioners were also part of the unlawful assembly. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG Haryana has stated that name of the petitioners were not mentioned in the FIR, however, on the basis Crl. Misc. No. M-35552 of 2010 2 of disclosure statement made by other co-accused they were also found involved in the incident. Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in event of arrest of the petitioners, they shall be released on bail on furnishing their personal bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer subject to the conditions provided under 438(2) Cr.P.C. Petitioners shall participate in the investigation as and when they are required to do so. (ALOK SINGH) 05.01.2011 JUDGE reena