IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35754 of 2010 KAUSHAL RAI SON OF BAIJNATH RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 03.11.2010 Heard both sides. Petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in view of the liberty so granted to him by order dated 12.8.2009 passed on his earlier bail application (Annexure-1). Order at Annexure-1 eloquently indicate the reasons for rejection of his bail. In view of the observations made in concluding paragraph of order dated 12.8.2009, status report was called for in this case. The same is at Flag-X. It appears therefrom that charges have been framed against the petitioner on 1.9.2009 and steps have been taken to ensure appearance of the prosecution witnesses. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 9.2.2009. Having regard to the materials on record including the status report, this Court, while declining the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner, disposes of the application with the following order: let the Trial Court endeavour and examine all prosecution witnesses within 07 months from the date of receipt/communication of the order in the Court below failing which the Trial Court shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to its satisfaction in connection with Patory P.S. case no. 126 of 2008(S.T. no. 334/09) subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailers will be own/close family member of the petitioner. (ii) The petitioner shall appear in person on each and every date fixed in the Court below. In case of default on two consecutive occasions without any cogent/satisfactory reason, the bail bond of the petitioner shall be cancelled and thereafter the Trial Court will be at liberty to secure his arrest in accordance with law. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )