IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1587 of 2008 ARUNA SINGH Versus RAJESH KUMAR SINGH ----------- 4 22/5/2009 This case has been brought under the heading „to be mentioned‟ at the instance of counsel for the opposite party, who would point out that there is typographical error/omission at page 3 and 5 of the order dated 25.9.2008. He would point out that in page 3 in 12th line from the top after the word „monthly‟ the word “income” has been omitted. Similarly, he would point out that in the same page in the 14th line from the top after the word „same‟ the word “standard” has been wrongly typed as „stand and‟. He would further point out that at page 5 in the 3rd line from the top the word „far‟ has been wrongly typed as fare, and these errors are capable of creating some confusion. Having perused the order, this Court is of the opinion that counsel for the opposite party is correct. Such typographical error/omission also has not opposed by counsel for the petitioner and accordingly, this Court would direct for addition of word “income” in 12th line from the top at page 3 and also replacement of word „stand and‟ by word “Standard” in the 14th line from the top in the same page and word „fare‟ in the 3rd lime from top at 2 page 5 by the word “far”. To the aforementioned extend the order dated 25.9.2008 would stand amended. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar