IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 15215 of 2008. Date of Decision: 8th January, 2009. Sawinder Pal ....Petitioner through Mr. M.S.Rai, Advocate Versus State of Punjab & Ors. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) The petitioner seeks a Mandamus to direct the respondents not to interfere in his peaceful possession over House No. 27/4, LIG Housing Board Colony, PUDA, Pathankot. According to the petitioner, he is in possession of the said property for the last more than 25 years, as is also clear from the order dated 23.2.1990 [Annexure P-1] passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and he is sought to be dispossessed by respondent No.4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the record, I do not find any tangible adverse action taken by respondents No. 1 to 3 against the petitioner so as to dispossess him from the subject property. There appears to be some private dispute between the petitioner and respondent No. 4 regarding the afore-stated property and on that count, respondent NO. 4 is alleged to have attempted to dispossess the petitioner forcibly. The effective remedy for the petitioner would be to approach the Civil Court and/or the District Administration who may ensure that the petitioner is not dispossessed from the subject property except in due course of law. With the observation aforementioned, this writ petition is disposed of. January 08, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE