wp331.11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.331 OF 2011 1) Manohar Renudas Sontakke, R/o-226, Scheme No.13, CIDCO, N-2, Aurangabad, 2) Rameshwar Devidas Bandiwan, R/o-243, Scheme No.13, CIDCO, N-2, Aurangabad. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS 1) The City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd., "Nirmal" 2nd Floor, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021, Through its Managing Director, 2) The City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd., Udyog Bhavan, Town Centre, New Aurangabad 431 003, Through its Chief Administrator, 3) The Aurangabad Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad, Through its Commissioner. ...RESPONDENTS. wp331.11 2 ... Shri. Ajay S. Deshpande Advocate for Petitioners. Shri. A.S. Bajaj Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri. S.S. Tope Advocate for Respondent No.3. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND S.V. GANGAPURWALA, JJ. DATE : 20TH JANUARY, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Petitioners pray for directions to Respondent CIDCO to allot shoplet plots as odd shaped plots, as indicated in the map appended at Exhibit 'A' to the Petition. 3. We have perused the reply filed by the Respondent CIDCO. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the wp331.11 3 Petitioners submits that the CIDCO had sold some other plots as shoplet plots, which were in the real sense, odd shaped plots. The Petitioners are adjacent owners of present shoplet plots. 5. After considering the submissions advanced and perusing the reply filed on behalf of the CIDCO, we do not find any error in the view of the CIDCO. In exercise of our extra ordinary writ jurisdiction, no interference is warranted. The Writ Petition stands dismissed, summarily. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/JAN11/wp331.11