IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44270 of 2008 MITHILESH SINGH, son of Late Janak Singh, resident of village Sahar Rampur, P.S. Naubatpur, District Patna …. Petitioner Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ….. Opposite party ----------- 02/ 27.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the Informant. Petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 302 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He appears to be the assailant. Counsel for the petitioner submits that from the injury report, it will appear that the gun shot injury, which is said to be the cause of death in the First Information Report, has not been found in the post-mortem report. I regret to accept such submission as two wounds, which are the cause of death, were stitched after the deceased received gun shot injuries and was taken to hospital for treatment, may be a private clinic, where the injuries were stitched. However, when he did not survive and was taken for post-mortem, then the doctor found two stitched wounds on the person of the deceased. In the circumstances, there is no merit in the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. This application is, accordingly, rejected. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)