CW 1720/10 {1} In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Jaipur Bench ** Civil Writ Petition No.1720/2010 Dinesh Kumar Versus State & Ors Date of Order : 08/02/10 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi Mr. Devendra Kr. Bhardwaj, for petitioner Petitioner while being initially appointed as Veterinary Assistant on 19/05/2007 on being transferred vide order dt. 18/12/2009 (Ann.1) from Sub Centre Chandwaji (Jaipur) to Rojri (Bikaner) preferred appeal-2116/2009, which was dismissed vide order dt.01/02/2010. Counsel submits that petitioner upon his initial appointment on 19/05/2007 was posted at Sriganganagar and came to Jaipur district on transfer vide order dt.30/06/2008 and his wife is also in Government service; in such circumstances, his transfer impugned cannot be said to be in the interest of administration. Counsel further submits that petitioner was relieved on 18/12/2009 but it has been made clear by Assistant Director Sri Ganganagar vide letter dt.24/12/09 that Sub Centre Rojri is under the control of Sri Ganganagar while vide order impugned, he has been transferred to Bikaner which shows that respondents have not applied their mind while issuing order of transfer impugned. CW 1720/10 {2} Submission made by Counsel is without any merit for the reason that petitioner has been transferred to Sub Centre Roji but it appears that there might be some mistake in making reference of the district where Rojri is situated and once ti has been made clear by respondents vide letter dt.24/12/09 (Ann.3) that Sub-Centre Rojri is under the control of Assistant Director Sri Ganganagar, he is certainly required to report at the place of his posting at Sub Centre Rojri as clarified vide Ann.3., but that cannot be a ground for interference by this Court. That apart, it is not the case of petitioner that the authority which has ordered the transfer impugned is biased or there is any violation of statutory rules. This Court finds no manifest error being committed by the learned Tribunal, which may call for interference by this Court. Consequently, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. (Ajay Rastogi), J. K.Khatri/p2/ 1720CW2010Fb8DsTrns.doc