IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 15TH JUNE 2007 / 25TH JYAISHTA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 676 of 2007(S) ------------------------------ IN WA.2075/2006 Dated 04/12/2006 .................... PETITIONER/APPELLANT ------------------------------------- M.PUSHKARAN, KOLLABHAGATHU VEEDU, MALAYAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.S.BABU GIREESAN RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. MOHAN DAS AGED 52, (S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE DIRECTOR, SREE CHITRA THIRUNAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. S. SASIKUMAR, AGED 49, (S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, SREE CHITRA THIRUNAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. RESPONDENTS BY ADV. SHRI T.R. RAVI. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, C.J. & K.T. SANKARAN, J. ................................................................................... CONTEMPT CASE ( C)No. 676 OF 2007 ................................................................................... Dated this the 15th June, 2007 J U D G M E N T H.L. Dattu, C.J.: Alleging that the respondents herein have disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court by judgment in W.A.No. 2075 of 2006 dated 4th December, 2006, the appellant in the Writ Appeal has filed this Contempt case. 2. Shri T.R. Ravi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, brings to our notice that being aggrieved by the orders and direction issued by this court by judgment in W.A. 2075 of 2006 dated 4th December, 2006, the respondents have already filed a Special Leave Petition No. 6619 of 2007 before the Apex court and that the same is admitted by the Apex court. 3. In view of these developments, we are not inclined to take cognizance of this Contempt case filed by the petitioner/appellant in the CONTEMPT CASE ( C)No. 676 OF 2007 2 Writ Appeal. Therefore this Contempt case is rejected for the present. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner/appellant in the Writ Appeal to approach this Court, if need arises in future. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE. lk