IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2714 of 2007 ANIL KUMAR Versus ANJANI KUMAR SINGH & ANR ----------- 3. 21.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner claims violation of the order dated 10.5.2001. On perusal of the same, this Court finds that the writ petition of the petitioner was dismissed with observation that he may file an appropriate representation which shall be disposed of in accordance with law by the competent authority. In the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party No.2, it is stated that the Director, Administration-cum-Joint Secretary, Human Resources Development Department has already passed an order contained in memo No.664 dated 15.4.2008 rejecting the claim of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said action of the authority is contemptuous. In the facts and circumstances of the case, no case of proceeding under the contempt jurisdiction of this Court is made out. The contempt application is, accordingly, - 2 - dismissed. The petitioner, if aggrieved by the said action of the authority including the order dated 15.4.2008, may challenge the same in appropriate proceedings. VPS ( Ramesh Kumar Datta, J. )