IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 313 of 2011 Date of decision: March 22, 2011 Ranbir Kaur .. Petitioner Vs. Kuldeep Ram .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Anil Kumar Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondent. A.N. Jindal, J The respondent has refused to accept the notice, therefore, he is proceeded against ex-parte. On perusal of the order it transpires that the court has not taken the right view of the matter. During the pendency of the proceedings under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act (herein referred as, 'the Act') the court vide order dated 21.4.2008 had directed the respondent to pay maintenance pendente lite `5000/- p.m. The application under Section 9 of the Act remained pending up to 29.5.2009 when it was dismissed. Under these circumstances, the petitioner is entitled to recover the amount as per order dated 21.4.2008 till 29.5.2009 during which period, the application remained pending, but the trial court has taken wrong view of the matter while declining the right of the petitioner to recover the amount for the period the petition remained pending. Hence, the order is apparently perverse inviting interference by this Court. Resultantly, this petition is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the executing court is directed to proceed in accordance with law. March 22, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge