HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.6036 of 2011 ORDER:- Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. The allegations in the FIR which is sought to be quashed would show that they do disclose commission of offences punishable under Sections 447, 427, 506 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The FIR shows that there is a land dispute between the parties. Having regard to the allegations found in the FIR it cannot be said that no case is made out. The learned counsel for the petitioner raised several pleas relating to the ownership of the land and possession but those pleas relate to disputed questions of fact and cannot be decided in this petition. In the circumstances the relief for quashing the FIR is rejected. 3. It is stated that the petitioner is a business man. Having regard to the nature of the offences and the land dispute and also having regard to the fact that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be necessary the police are directed to take a decision about the arrest of the petitioner after completion of the investigation. 4. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of at the admission stage. ______________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J 21st July 2011 CVRK