IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 27TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 5TH ASWINA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 391 of 2011(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER : --------------- MAHALAKSHMI V.NAIK, W/O. SRI.H. VARADARAJ NAIK, “SREE LAKSHMI VENKATESH PRASAD”, NEAR L.V TEMPLE, P.O. KANHANGAD, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.MAHESH V RAMAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HOSDURG POLICE STATION, KANHANGAD, KASARAGOD. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KASARAGOD. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.K.BABU. ADV. SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM FOR DETENUE THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(Crl.).No. 391 of 2011(S) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :- EXHIBIT-P1- TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 19/08/2011 LODGED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE S.H.O, HOSDURG RESPONDANTS'S EXHIBITS : NIL. TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE amk. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(Crl). No.391 OF 2011 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of September, 2011 JUDGMENT Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. The petitioner filed this writ petition alleging that her husband is missing. Today, the alleged detenu is present before us. 2. Adv.Sri.Peeyus A. Kottam appears for the alleged detenu. 3. The son of the petitioner is also present. We do not find any ground to hold that the alleged detenu is missing. His learned counsel says that he has some financial liabilities and that is why he is keeping away from town. We record the submission and close this writ petition. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN (Judge) C.T. RAVIKUMAR (Judge) spc