IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2840 of 2010 with CWP No. 3509 of 2010. Decided on: 19th August, 2010. 1. M/s. Hindustan Construction Company Limited. ….. Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. . …… Respondents. 2. Kashang Project Workers Union. … .. Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … … Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. CWP No. 2840 of 2010. Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG, for respondents No. 1 to 5. Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate, for respondent No. 13. Mr. Rajnish Maniktala, Advocate, for respondents No. 6 to 12. CWP No. 3509 of 2010. Mr. Rajnish Maniktala, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG, for respondents No. 1 to 3, 6 & 7. M/s. Vijay Pandit, M.A. Khan & Ramakant Sharma, Advocates, for respondent No. 4. Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate, for respondent No. 5. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral): C.M.P. No. 7544 of 2010. Allowed. 2 CWP No. 2840 of 2010 with CWP No. 3509 of 2010. Both the Management and workers are before this Court. The Project is for construction of Kashang Hydro Electric Project in District Kinnaur near Reckongpeo. Essentially, there is labour unrest. Having realized that the Deputy Commissioner would be in a position to settle the dispute amicably between the parties, we relegated the Management and the workers to the Deputy Commissioner, Kinnaur. It is heartening to note that Smt. Mamta, Deputy Commissioner, Kinnaur has effectively handled the issue and disputes have been amicably settled between the parties. In that view of the matter, learned counsel on both the sides submit that no further orders are necessary in these writ petitions. Accordingly, writ petitions are closed. 2. We record our appreciation for the timely and effective steps taken by Smt. Mamta, I.A.S., Deputy Commissioner, Kinnaur in intervening and settling the disputes between the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the additionally impleaded respondent in C.W.P. No. 2408 of 2010 submits that the construction carried out by the writ petitioner, is in violation of various statutory provisions. It is for the additionally impleaded respondent to independently pursue that relief. The Registry will communicate a copy of this judgment to Smt. Mamta, I.A.S., Deputy Commissioner, Kinnaur. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. [[ (Justice Rajiv Sharma), Judge. 19th August, 2010 (bhupender) 3