1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3940/2009 Smt. Shahin Farveen w/o Sayyed Nayyer Vs. Millat Education Society and others. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. A.R. Patil, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. N. S. Adbe, Advocate for respondent no.1. CORAM : A.P. LAVANDE AND P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 15, 2009. Heard Mr. Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Adbe, learned counsel for respondent no.1. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order of transfer dated 2.5.2009 issued by respondent no.2 and sought direction against respondent no1 to consider representations dated 9.6.2009 and 3.7.2009. Mr. Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner states that at this stage he is only pressing prayer clause (ii) in which direction is sought against respondent no.1 to consider the representations of the petitioner. According to Mr. Patil, the petitioner has not till date received any reply on behalf of the respondents to the said representations. Mr. Adbe, learned counsel for respondent no.1 2 states that respondent no.1 has already taken decision on the said representations. In view of the above, we direct respondent no.1 to communicate the decision taken on representations dated 9.6.2009 and 3.7.2009 of the petitioner within a period of one week to the petitioner. The petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy if the decision on the representations is adverse to the petitioner. Writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Ambulkar.