RSA No.1793 OF 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.1793 OF 2010 DATE OF DECISION: 9 th MAY, 2011 Gurbachan .... Appellant Versus Naresh Kumar .... Respondent CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. PRESENT: Appellant with counsel Mr. R. K. Malik, Advocate. Respondent with counsel Mr. Gorakh Nath, Advocate. * * * * L.N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL) With the intervention of the court, parties have effected amicable settlement. Their joint statement regarding settlement/compromise has been recorded separately. The same is reproduced hereunder: “Stated that with the intervention of the Court, we have effected compromise in this second appeal. As per compromise, the appellant shall pay further amount of Rs.1,00,000 to the respondent-plaintiff by deposit in the trial court within two months from today failing which the appeal shall be deemed to have been dismissed. This amount shall be in addition to Rs.1,00,000 deposited by appellant with Collector in the redemption application and another amount of Rs.1,00,000 deposited with the trial court after passing of decree by trial court. Respondent shall be entitled to withdraw all these amounts totaling Rs.3,00,000 lacs RSA No.1793 OF 2010 -2- and thereupon claim of the plaintiff-respondent shall be deemed to be satisfied in toto. The appeal be disposed of accordingly.” Thus appeal has been lawfully compromised. In view of compromise, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the above statement, which shall also form part of the decree sheet. (L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE 9th May, 2011 'raj'