IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1869 of 2008 KALI YADAV Versus MOST.SHANTI DEVI & ORS ----------- 2 14/11/2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. In the opinion of this Court the impugned order does not suffer from any jurisdictional error. The scope of remand of the appellate Court was confined and the evidence which the petitioner wanted to lead and was not permitted on remand by the trial court by the impugned order was infact governed by issue no. 3 already adjudicated by the trial court earlier and neither interfered nor remanded by the lower appellate court. That being so, this Court does not find any error in the impugned order. Accordingly, this application being wholly misconceived must be and is hereby dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. ) Abhay Kumar