IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6002 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 20, 2010 Kashmiri Lal …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Arvind Rajotia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 06.08.2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hisar, thereby rejecting the amendment application under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. moved by the plaintiff, thereby seeking correction of the width of the road from 18’ feet to 24 feet. C.R.6002 of 2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that defendants shall be cross-examined by the plaintiff on the point of his pleadings before the Consumer Court to prove that in fact width of the road is 24 feet. He further states that in view of the above, present petition be dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, plaintiff – petitioner shall be at liberty to cross-examine the defendants on the admission/pleadings made by him before the Consumer Court. September 20, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2