IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 459 OF 2009 IN SUO MOTU WRIT PETITION NO. 2 OF 2007 M/S. MEERA VENTURES ... Applicant Mr. Sudhesh Usgaonkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Norma Alvares, Advocate, as Amicus Curiae. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Mr. P. Talaulikar, Addl. Government Advocate for Original Respondent nos. 1, 3 to 6. Mr. P. Arolkar, Advocate for Respondent nos. 8, 9, 12, 16, 17, 19 and 47. Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for Original Respondent no.10. Mr. N. K. Sawaikar, Advocate for Original Respondent nos. 11 and 15. Mr. A. F. Diniz, Advocate for Original Respondent no.7. Mr. P. A. Kamat, Advocate for Original Respondent nos. 42 to 45. Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. D. Lawande, Advocate for Respondent no.2. Mr. Zeller D' Souza, Advocate for Respondent nos. 33, 35 to 37. Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Ms. S. Vaidhya, Advocate for Respondent nos. 18 and 46. Mr. N. Sardessai, Advocate for Respondent nos. 25 and 27. Mr. Amit Palekar, Advocate for Respondent no. 31. Mr. M. P. Almeida, ADvocate for Respondent nos. 23, 40 and 41. Mrs. Harsha Naik, Advocate for Original Respondent no. 38. Coram:- S.B. DESHMUKH & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 3rd August, 2009 P.C. We have heard learned Counsel for the applicant, learned Amicus Curiae in Suo Motu Writ Petition No. 2/2007 and learned Counsel appearing for Respondent no.15-Curchorem Cacora Municipal Council. We have also considered the Order passed by this Court earlier in Suo Motu Writ Petition no. 2/2007 dated 13.07.2009 and 12.02.2009. 2. Learned Counsel for the applicant points out to the reply/affidavit (page 48 in MCA no. 460/2009) in compliance of the Order passed by this Court dated 13.07.2009. From Para 8 of the reply/affidavit, learned Counsel for the applicant, has pointed out that the applicant has filed application dated 21.07.2009 to the Respondent no.15 intimating that the applicant intends to erect composting unit as indicated in the plan annexed to the application. 3. In view of this, the Counsel appearing for Respondent no.15 in Suo Motu Writ Petition no. 2/2007, has no objection for considering this application. Since our Order stands complied and, in view of para 8 of the reply/affidavit, this application can be considered favourably, respondent no.15-Municipal Council, is directed not to withhold the grant of Occupancy Certificate to the applicant in view of the Order passed by this Court on 12.07.2009, in Suo Motu Writ Petition no. 2/2007. Such Certificate to be issued by the Municipal Council i.e. respondent no.15 within three weeks from today. 4. Misc. Civil Application is accordingly allowed and disposed off. Authenticated copy of this Order is permitted to be issued to the parties on their demand and as per usual procedure. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. U. D. SALVI, J. arp/*