PtfMo^ T^(S - ^- '^r> S*s. "i ii ^ • -, IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION (MT\0. / 9 ? S/2007 PETITIONER ^i^ ^^> ^%>'" ^^ ^Bhanu Pratap Singh Baghel S/o Late Shri RawaSingh Baghel, aged 3,0^years occupation:Enemployed R/o Village Kamalpur Post Gudaru, Distt. Sarguja C.G. VERSUS R^PONDENTS .-.^ L StateofC.G. through Secretary General Administration, State Govemment ofC.G. Secretriat, Raipur (C.G.) 2.- Public Service Commission C.G. Through: Secretary P.S.C. Shanker Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) .3; Chairman, State P.S.C.ofC.G. Shanker Nagar Road, Raipur (C.G.) WMT PETITION U/A 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. HK3H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(C) No. 1335 of 2007 PeBKoner Bhanu Pratap Singh Bagtel Versus Respondents State of C.G. and ottiers SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Safish K. Agnihotri, J Shri Gokut Narayan Mishra, Advocate for the peBtioner. Miss Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.1 ORDER ( Psssed <m thfe ^f> day <rf March, 2007) The foUowing order of the Court is pcssed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. The petitfoner appeared in the Civil Seroices Utain ExaminsdKin - 2SXS, conducted by the Chhatfisgarh PubBc Service Commiswm, held in September, 2<M6. The peffltoner could not succeed in ttie examinaBon. 2. Being aggrieved, the petifioner has filed ttiis petifion seeking a <flrection to the respondente to revaluate his answer sheets on ttie ground that the petitioner had done very well in the ©camincrtion.Thsre fe no ottier ground fcir seeking revaluation of the answer sheets. The petifioner has not made out any case for revaluation excejrt that the p^ifoner hcs done veiy well in the examinatton. 3. tt is well settted that the pditioner has a right to appear in Ihe examinatkm but no right to be declared as succ^sful. The examinafion itsetf indicsrtes selection of eligible candidates. 4. This petiBon lacfes material facte and is frivotous, whuh deserves to be and is dismissed, summarily. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn