IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1730 (M/S) of 2010 Dhaninath Goswami S/o Harjitnath Goswami … Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and another …Respondents Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Shah, Standing Counsel for the respondents. (Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J.) Heard Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. N.P. Shah, Standing Counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following relief- (A) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to connect the electricity connection of Goswami Kharia Factory, Bametha Bangar, Narayan Puram Halduchaur Haldwani. (B) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to reconnect the electricity connection of the petitioner in accordance with the provisions of U.P. Industrial Undertaking (Special Provision for Prevention of Unemployment) Act, 1966 and Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 and further to permit the petitioner to deposit the arrears of electricity dues, after reconnection of the petitioner’s factory. (C) Issue any other direction or order, as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. 2 Perusal of relief sought by the petitioner shows that no such relief can be granted in writ jurisdiction. The petitioner may approach the appropriate authority for the redressal of his grievances. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed. Dated: 05-10-2010 ( B.S. Verma, J. ) ISB