THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3366 OF 2009 DATED:13-12- 2010. Between 1.M.Krishna Murthy Reddy and another … Petitioners-D3 and D4 And 1.Shaik Dada Saheb and others …Respondents-Plaintiff and D1 and D2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3366 OF 2009 ORDER: This revision is directed against the order, dated 22-04-2009, in I.A.No.286 of 2008 in O.S.No.28 of 2006, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Puttur. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners contended that there is no judicial determination of marking of Ex.A1 to A3, that the grievance of the petitioners is that in spite of their absence, the documents Exs.A1 to A3 were marked and therefore, it has to be set aside. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondent contended that both the petitioners were present at the time of marking the documents and therefore, there are no grounds to interfere with the order under challenge.. 4. Without adverting to the merits of the case, the admissibility and relevancy of the documents can be tested by the trial Court during the course of arguments in the suit with reference to other evidence on record. 5. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to raise the contentions with regard to admissibility and relevancy of the documents at appropriate time. No order as to costs. -------------------- K.C.BHANU, J DATED:13-12- 2010 Hsd