IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 09th day of July, 2010 First Bail Application No.1269 of 2009 Criminal Side Moh. Haneef S/o Shri Zameel Ahamad R/o Panditpur, Police Station Thakurdwara District Moradabad (U.P) ……...Applicant ( in Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand through Secretary Home Dehradun …..….Respondent Arising out of F.I.R. No. 164 of 2009 Under Section: 302, 201, 363, 366, 376 I.P.C. P.S. Jaspur District: UdhamSingh Nagar. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J Shri S.K. Agarwal, Senior Advocate, assisted by Shri Swapnil Bisht, Advocate, present for the applicant. Shri M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State. Applicant- Moh. Haneef who is in jail in connection with F.I.R. No. 164 of 2009, relating to offences punishable under section 302, 201, 363, 366,376 I.P.C., P.S. Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar, has sought his release on bail. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that no role has been assigned to applicant Haneef in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that dead body of the girl is said to have been recovered on pointong out co-accused Aslam. -2- Having heard submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, this Court finds that the nature of offence is too heinous. A minor girl has been raped and murdered. During investigation, it is said to have been found that alongwith Moh. Aslam, present applicant was also involved in the commission of crime. In the above circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail in the present case. The bail application is rejected. Dt. 09.07.2010 Parul (Prafulla C. Pant, J.)