3 6" IN THE HIGII COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No.^^ / 2002 PETmONER : UshaDadsena, Aged about 38 year^ Wd/o Oiziprakash DadBena^ R/o Behind Kisan Rice Mills, Pithora, Mahasaniund, Versus" EESPQNDEITS : 1. State ofChhatti.sgarh, Though Secretary^ ^Departinent of Education, Shastri Chowk, ^f Raipur. .<^" - K^r*1< '^y' •&..»s 2< ^State ofChhattisgai'hy Through Secretery^ Public Works Department, Mantralya^ Sha^tri Chowk^ Raipur. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF TH.E CONSTITUTION OF IWDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITIQEL CERTIORARI ETC.OR ANY QTHER_ I)LRE^TIC^N_ _OR ORDERTQ DQJUSTICEJNTHE_MATrER, l^. f"" "s HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR SINGLB BENCH : HON»BLESHRI SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRJT PBTITION N0. 524 OF 2002 \^: • Petitloner Respondents versus Usha Dadsena State of Chhatdsgarh & aaofher Present : Shri Viaay Paadey, counsel for fhe petitioner, Snit Anju Ahuja, Deputy Goveniment Advocate for ftie State. ORALORDBR (27th June, 2006) The hiisbaad of the petitioner namely Shri Oia Prakash Dadsena died whUe worktag as Troie Keeper ia the office of CoUector, Mahasaoiund ia hamess on 9.4.1999. Thereafter, fhe petitioner has niade aa appUcation for compassionate appoiataient on 12,10.2000. The appoiataient was declmed on the ground fhat fhe deceased husband of fhe petitiouer died before fhe creation of State of Chhattisgarh on 1.11.2000. The Goveranient of Chhatdsgarh, by its circular dated 2.2.2006, has directedaU fhe departcaents to consider cases of all the eUgible dependant-legal heu' offtie deceased/employees, who died ia hamess between 1.11.1997 to 31.10.2000 for conipassionate appointment. 1^-—^ ^ 0^>.^ 6. Accordiagly, fhe Govemment of Chhattisgarh is directed to consider fhe case of fhe petitioner as per its own circular dated 2.2.2006 aad also in view of fhe order passed by fhis Court ui Writ PetitionNo.3879/2004 aad ofher connected matters on its own raerit, ia accordaace wititi law, wifhui a period of eight weeks, on such rcprcsentation beiag fiiled by the petitioner. For fhe reasons stated above, the writpetition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. | Satish K. Agnihotri Judge