- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION jmi NOTICE OF MOTION NO.182 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.1656 OF 2005. Mrs.Swaran K. Gupta. ..Plaintiff. vs. Mr.Pankaj K. Gupta. ..Defendant. .... Mr.Peregrin V. Gomes, i/b. N.N.Amin & Co., for the Plaintiff. Mr.Sanskar Marathe, i/b. Deven Dwarkadas & Partners, for the Defendant. .... CORAM CORAM CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY,2009 : 10TH FEBRUARY,2009 : 10TH FEBRUARY,2009. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . This notice of motion is taken out by the defendant who is the son of the plaintiff for expeditious hearing of the suit on the ground that the plaintiff who is 82 years old is personally aware of the facts in the suit. Again at the interim stage, a portion of the property which according to the defendant comes to his share is allowed to be used by the plaintiff, which interim order according to the defendant is operating like a final decree against him. The learned Advocate appearing for the plaintiff has no objection if the hearing of the suit is expedited. 2. In view thereof, hearing of the suit stands expedited. Parties to file affidavits of documents - 2 - alongwith compilation of documents on or before 25th February 2009. The plaintiff to file his affidavit of evidence on or before 3rd March 2009. 3. Notice of motion stands disposed of. 4. Place the suit for directions on 4th March 2009. 5. Independent of the above order, since the dispute is between the mother and her son, the learned Advocates for the parties have agreed to remain present in my chamber on 18th February 2009 at 2.30 p.m. to explore the possibility of settling the matter. [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, [S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.] J.] J.]