Civil Revision No.3079 of 2011(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.3079 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: May 11, 2011 Jasbir Singh and another .....Petitioners v. Smt.Kirpal Kaur and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.M.S.Nain, Advocate for the petitioners. ....... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) C.M.No.12249-CII of 2011 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Civil Revision No.3079 of 2011 The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside order dated 23.2.2011, Annexure P5, vide which evidence of the petitioners-defendants was closed by order of the Court and order dated 19.3.2011, Annexure P8, vide which their application for leading additional evidence was also declined. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned orders passed by learned trial Court. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners- defendants that though suit was filed by respondents-plaintiffs in the year 2003, however, their evidence was concluded on 19.10.2010. It is further contended that though thereafter some opportunities were availed by petitioners-defendants to adduce evidence, however, handwriting and finger Civil Revision No.3079 of 2011(O&M) -2- print expert could not be examined as his mother expired and later on counsel for the petitioners had to accompany his daughter to Bangalore, as she got employment there. Hence, it is contended that only one opportunity be granted to petitioners-defendants to examine handwriting and finger print expert at their own responsibility. In view of these facts, though sufficient opportunities have been availed by petitioners-defendants to adduce evidence, however, in the interest of justice, one opportunity can be granted to them to examine handwriting and finger print expert at their own responsibility and the other party can be compensated by way of cost. Hence, the present revision petition is accepted. Impugned order is set aside to the extent that learned trial Court is directed to grant one effective opportunity to petitioners-defendants to examine handwriting and finger print expert at their own responsibility by taking dasti summons subject to payment of `5,000/- as cost, which shall be a condition precedent. Disposed of accordingly. 11.5.2011 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge