- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3555/2009 Shivling Shankarrao Akulwar. ...Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents... ..... Shri P.V. Jadhavar, Advocate for petitioner. Shri K.J. Ghute Patil, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 3. Shri M.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent no.2. ..... CORAM: P.V. HARDAS & R.K. DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE: 25.06.2009 PER COURT: 1] This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns the order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Degloor, dated 29.12.2008 rejecting the application of the petitioner for issuance of a certificate as - 2 - belonging to Mannerwarlu scheduled tribe. The petitioner in support of his claim as belonging to Mannerwarlu scheduled tribe relied upon the validity certificates granted to Umakant Hanmantrao Akulwar and Sanjaykumar Balajirao Akulwar. In order to establish his relationship with the validity certificate holders, the petitioner placed on record the validity certificates and the genealogies. The first genealogy, which is at page 22 of the petition, is in respect of Umakant Hanmantrao Akulwar. Unfortunately, this genealogy does not disclose the name of Sanjaykumar Balajirao Akulwar, who is said to be a cousin of the petitioner. Similarly, another genealogy is placed on record at page 25 of the petition, in respect of Sanjaykumar Balajirao Akulwar. This genealogy does not disclose the name of Umakant Hanmantrao Akulwar. The genealogies submitted by the petitioner were incomplete. 2] In the light of that, therefore, no fault can be found with the authorities in declining to issue certificate to the petitioner on the basis of such truncated genealogies. The petition is, therefore, summarily dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to apply afresh after producing appropriate genealogy. (R.K. Deshpande,J.) (P.V. Hardas, J.) ndk/c2560928