IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 6TH MAY 2010 / 16TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 13773 of 2010(V) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- N.P.UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O. PARAMESWARAN, NELLIKKAL HOUSE, KOOVAPPADI, PROPRIETOR, M/S. ARUN VENEER, KUNDALA, ANJUKUNNU, MANANDAVADI, WAYANADU. BY ADV. SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY (LOCAL SELF GOVT.) SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE SECRETARY, PANAMARAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT WAYANAD DISTRICT. 3. THE PANAMARAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT COUNCIL, R REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, PANAMARAM, WAYANAD DISTRICT ADV. SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY FOR R2 & 3 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. M.H. AMIL KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX Ext.P1. True copy of the license dated 11.7.2008 of the 2nd respondent. Ext.P2. True copy of the license dated 1.6.2009 of the 2nd respondent. Ext.P3. True copy of the consent dated 30.3.2010. Ext.P4. True copy of the application for licence dated 15.2.2010. Ext.P5. True copy of the judgment dated 8.3.2010. Ext.P6. True copy of the order dated 7.4.2010. Ext.P7. True copy of the appeal dated 14.4.2010. Ext.P8. True copy of the stay petition dated 14.4.2010.. // true copy // P.S TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.13773 OF 2010 () -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner is running a wood based Industrial Unit . The licence issued by the respondent Panchayat was cancelled by Ext.P6 order. On receipt of Ext.P6 petitioner filed Ext.P7 appeal along with Ext.P8 stay petition before the 3rd respondent. Exts.P7 and P8 are pending. In the meanwhile, apprehending coercive action based on Ext.P6, this writ petition is filed. 2. Counsel for the respondent Panchayat confirmed the pendency of Ext.P7 and P8. Having regard to the above, it is only appropriate that implementation of Ext.P6 be deferred, at least till the consideration of Ext.P8 stay petition. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent Panchayat to consider Ext.P8 stay petition with notice to the petitioner and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 4 weeks from today. It is directed that in the meanwhile further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P6 will be kept in abeyance. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/ WPC.No. /09 :2 :