^• >^^ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR fC.G.l W.P. N0. ^^^ 3 /2003 ^ PETITIQNBRS: ^^ ^,^-^ '^^'^' •^' ^ 3?rN:^ ^^as^._s^^ ^.?&.!s^ g^ ^m^-i. ?G. 8Uasp"( c^^01 ^^ ^ \^ ^ ^•' 6. RAVIDASAGE 31 YEARS S/0 LATE SHRI RAMSAI RAM R/0 BAUIPARA., NEAR JAISWAL BHAWAN,AMBIKAUR, DISTT. SURGUJA NARENDRA KUMAR MARAVI S/0 LATE JANGSAI MARAVI GRAM RADHAPUR POST PRATAPGARH, SITAPUR, DISTRICT SURGUJA CHANDRASHEKHAR SINGH AGE 21 YEARS, S/0 LATE ARJUN PRASAD PAIKARA, GRAM SAURA POST KUSMl, DISTRICT SURGUJA. SANJAY KUMAR EKKA, AGE 23 YEARS S/0 LATE MILKU RAM, R/0 GRAM CHAINPUR, TAHSIL SITAPUR, DISTRICT SURGUJA AVNISH PANDEY, AGE 30 YEARS S/0 LATE RAM SHRINGAR PANDEY R/0 GRAM- POST LAKHANPUR, SARGUJA SURGUJA ASHISH KUMAR VERMA AGE 24 YEARS S/0 LATE USHA VERMA R/0 AMBIKAPUR GANDHINAGAR, Al^IKAPUR, SURGUJA, DISTT. SURGUJA ' 7. MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY AGE 33 YEARS, S/0 SMT. TARA. . PANDEY R/0 MISSION COLONY BAIKUNTHPUR, DISTT. KOREA, 8. DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINGH AGE 22 YEARS S/0 LATE SITARAM R/0 PANDRIPAMI, TAHSIL AMBIKAPUR, DISTT. SURGUJA. , t^. <;l i '', ^,;..,- '•-,/• ^ (^ "'^ ^' '::- / . -> ^^'^.>v '^ -: fr^^ ^^[i^ . ?[ 3%^| ^-y^^'^j! \A<iK ^ -^/^ "^^^y 9, SHASHI BHUSHANSINGH -< AGE 27 YEARS, S/0 LATE : .SATYAPRAKASH SINGH R/0 GRAM SIDHAWA, POST !<AKANA, THANA & TAHSIL AJPUR, DISTT. SURGUJA. 10. AVINASH PRATAP SINGH AGE 19 YEARS S/0 LATE SHRIKANT SINGH R/0 GRAM INDERPUR POST ODGI, DISTT. SURGUJA. 11. SMT. BAIYA DEVI AGE 45 YEARS, W/0 LATE BHUIRRAM R/0 JAINAGAR, TAHSIL SURAJPUR, DISTT. SURGUJA 12. VIRENDRA PRATAP SINGH AGE 24 YEARS^ADOPTED SON) S/0 LATE RADHIKA SINGH R/0 PRATAPPUR, SHANTINAGAR, SURGUJA. .^•...^ ^^i^a^--».aft z 13. SMT. SAVARGAOKAR YEARS, WD/0 SAVARGAOKAR, VANITA AGE 30 SURESH R/0 GURUKUL VIDHYALAYA NAVAPARA, AMBIKAPUR, DISTRICT SARGUJA .-<- 14. VISHNU PRASAD ARMO AGE 21 YEARS, S/0 LATE BANWARI RAM ARMO R/0 GRAM GHAT BARRA, POST 'TARA, THANA PREMNAGAR, AMBIKAPUR, DISTRICT SARGUJA ~f t/-4' \-J \, :le^K. ^- 15. DEVENDRA. SINGH, AGED 29 YEAR S/0 LATE RAMNATH SINGH R/0 GRAM POST PATNA, DISTT. KOREA. 16. ANIL KUMAR SINHA AGE 35 YEARS S/0 LATE RADHAVASHARAN PRASAD SINHA R/0 827 CHAPRA COLONY, HIGH SCHOOL ROAD YISHR^MPUR DISTRICT SURGUJA. 17, PRADEEP KUMAR DUBEY AGE 24 YEARS S/0 LATE VINOD KUMAR DUBEY R/0 SAHELI GALI, PRATAPPUR NAI<A, AMBIKAPUR DISTRICT SARGUJA 18. SATYADEV SINGH AGB 21 YEARS S/0 LATE sl.fea^aii&.aaSu—B— -4 RAMGAHAN SINGH R/0 HARRAPARA THANA MAIYA THANA SURAJPUR, DISTRICT SARGUJA 19. RAGHAVENDRA SINGH CHOUHAN AGE 34 YEARS, S/0 IATE RAGHUNANDAN SINGH CHOUHAN R/0 GRAM POST BALRAMPUR, DISTT. SURGUJA 20. ANIL KUMAR CHAT.URVEDI AGE 22 YEARS S/0 LATE SITAPRASAD CHATURVEDI, R/0 GRAM TUSAHI, THANA RATANGAWA, REWA (M.P.) ^^^^N^tJlf ^.^.-.-..; - •• • - 21. ANIL KUMAR SINGH AGE 30 YEARS S/0 LATE DHANNULAL SINGH R/0 GRAM POST KASRA, MANJHAPARA, DISTRICT KOREA 22. HARIRAM SAHU AGE 35 YEARS S/0 LATE RAMLAL SAHU R/0 NAMNKALA PANI TANKI KE PAS AMBIKAPUR DISTRICT SARGUJA 23. BUENDRA KUMAR THAKUR AGE 19 YEARS S/0 LATE CHATRADHARI RAM THAKUR R/0 GRAM NARESH PUR POST SURGUJA, DISTRICT SARGUJA r 24. MAHENDRA SINGH PARIHAR AGE 27 YEARS S/0 LATE SHOBHNATH SINGH PARIHAR R/0 GRAMHARIAHAR POST KEWRA TAHSIL PR^TAPPUR DISTRICT, SURGUJA. 25, INDRAJEET SINGH AGE 33 YEARS S/0 LATE RANJEET SINGH R/0 GRAM POST SARGAWA POST SAKALO, AMBIKAPUR, DISTRICT SURGUJA 26. DAYANAND VERMA AGE 29 YEARS S/0 LATE PREM DAS VERMA R/0 UDAYPUR NEAR POLICE CHOWKI, DISTT. SURGUJA ^^•^^-^^t^ 27. VINOD KUMAR JAISHWAL AGE 32 YEARS S/0 LATE SHYAMLAL JAISHWAL R/0 GRAMAMHAR POST PATNA, TAHSIL BAIKUNTHPUR KOREA ^^ 28. ASHISH KUMAR YADAV AGE 23 YEARS S/0 LATE VRIHASPATI RAM YADAV R/0 GRAM PUNDURDIHARI DABARIPARA, AMBIKAPUR, DISTRICT SARGUJA 29. SMT. FILISITA BHAGAT AGE 26 YEARS WD/0 INJOR RAM BHAGAT R/0 GRAM POST BATOLI, BAGICHA ROAD, DISTRICT SURGUJA / 30. MANOJ SHARMA AGE 20 YEARS S/0 LA.TE SUNDAR LAL SHARMA R/0 PANCHSHIL SWEET GALI, A3MBIKAPUR, DISTRICT SURGUJA 31. DEVENTI BAI AGE 42 YEARS WD/0 KAULESHWAR RAM R/0 GRAM. KEDLI TAHSIL KUSMI, DISTRICT AMBIKAPUR DISTRICT SARGUJA 32. CHANDRA PRAKASH AGED 20 YEARS SON OF LATE GOPAL PRASAD R/0. VILIAGE BITWA, POST SAMEYA, THANA AND TEHSIL SITAPUR, DISTRICT SARGUJA 33. RA.VINDRA NATH BISEN, AGED 22 YEARS SON OF LATB RAMESHWAR PRASAN BISEN, R/0. VILLAGE 3VIANJA, POST SARBHOKA, DISTRICT SARGUJA ^"" 34. BALRAM THAKUR AGED 22 YEARS, SON OF LATE MANSAY THAKUR, R/0. POST DEVNAGAR, TEHSIL AND THANA SARGUJA, DISTRICT SARGUJA. 35. AFTAB ALAM, AGED 30 YEARS, SON OF LATE NIYAJ @ KHAN, R/0. TODAPALI, AMBIKAPUR, DISTRICT SARGUJA ^! 36. SATRUGHAN SINGH, AGED 25 YEARS, SON OF LATE PANCHAM SINGH, R/0. GRAM DHANESHPUR, POST DEONAGAR, DISTRICT SARGUJA 37. ASHISH JOSEPH, AGED 18 YEARS, SON OF LATE VILLIAM JOSEPH, R/0. GRAM POST SUKRI, DISTRICT SARGUJA. 38. KU. ASHA, AGED 23 YEARS, D/0. LATE JAGDEO RAM, C/0. RAVI DAS BAURIPARA R/0. NEAR JAISWAL BHAWAN, DISTRICT AMBIKAPUR DISTRICT SARGUJA. 39. DHIRENDRA NATH, AGED 26 YEARS, SON OF 1ATE HIRAN RAM, R/0. GRAM TARGAWA, POST KASRA, DISTRICT KOREA. 40. ESHWR EKKA, SON OF LATE MAHINATH, R/0. GRAM KHARKONA, POST BAGDIHI, DISTRICT SARGUJA 41. ASHOK KUMAR SING, AGED 33 YEARS, SON OF LATE HEERA LAL SINGH, R/0. GRAM PAVADOL, POST BANJI, DISTRICT KOREA 42, DINESH KUMAR AGED 33 YEARS SON OF LATE SUBARDAY RA.M, R/0. BLOCK DIVISION SITAPUR, GRAM SARGA, DISTRICT SARGUJA .:^~^'. 43. RAMPRASAD AGED 28 YEARS, SON OF LATE HUKUM SAI, R/0. GRAM KANCHANPUR POST KAKNA TEHSIL AMBIKAPUR DISTRICT SARGUJA RESPONDBNTS ^ VERSUS THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH SECRETARY, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, MANTRALAYA, D.K.S. BHAWAN RAIPUR 2. COLLECTOR DISTRICT SARGUJA. 3. COLLECTOR DISTRICT KOREA 4. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH, THROUGH SECRETARY, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL(M.P.) 5. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL ^ AND TRAINING, (STATE REORGANISATION CELLj NEW DELHI. WRIT PETITION UNDER ^TICLES 22^/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 "^~^r '^rai^pr, "^TCFf^, t^fwy , W^T.^T f^TWarTI^T '^"Hbmf^T ,^^...^..^......^.^//.^ 290 'W^IT^^IT^' Slm ICishore Bhaduri & Sliii petitioners, ^ Slm Sandeep Dubey, Go\±A^ SbriS.K. Beriwal. Sr. Panel: Heard. The pe-titioners m' tliis p4 • themselves entitled for-compassionatl filed their retum on 1 1/3/2004 opposi|ig The matt.er canie up for heaii4g, Leamed counsd for the ^ petitioners m.av be allowed to c.omp.assiona.te appomtment before t^ mentioned m para 7J ofthe re!iefc| m accordance with law. He specific|i other relie.fmention.e.d m para. 7. It is As praved, the petitioners m^ CQmnetent authority .of the responder^ts order aixl. oii such representation respondetits decide the sanie on Suoject to.what has been statefcl Certified copy as per mles. be|ng v -^nfeRh ^p^rf n f^- ^T^I? ^T3?f^W3Tl^[ Saniav Kum.ar A.srawaL AdvoQates. for the A|i^/ocate, forrespondentsno.l to 3. Lja^Ter. forthe Union oflndia. |tition. have filed jomt petition .claiiTiirig ^ appomtment. P.espondents no.l to 3.have si|ig the petition. i4g- letitioners states that for the present the submit the detailed representation for ^e competent authority ofthe respondents "as laiise. which may be' comidered and decided jilly states .that the petitioners are not pressisig |:iot oppose.d by the coumel for other side<. ^y make a detailed representation before the ^ts< alotig with a. copy of the petition and this 'e|ng fiied, the cornpetexit airthority of th-s said its own merits m accordance with law. ie|:l above, tliis pention stands disposed of Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ['^^N^