HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BSLASPUR (Dsvssion Beneh) : Hon'ble Shri S.R. NAYAK, CJ & Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Petjtioner Respondent WR!T PETiTION N0.3351 OF 2005 In the matter of Laxman Das VERSUS StateofChhattisgarh Present: Mr. Suryakant Mishra, iearned counset for the petitjoner. Mr. WS Murthy, iearned Dy. Advocate Generai. with Mr. Sumesh Bajaj, teamed Dy. Govt. Adv.< for the State ofChhattisgarh. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 30m of November 2005) The foliowsng Orcier ofthe Court was by S.R. Nayak, CJ: The petitioner who w-as convic-ted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in the of Maharashtra for an offence punishable under Sectton 302 of the indian Penal Code vide judgment and order dated 03/02/1992 and he has been In Imprisonment. Sn the letter which has been treated as writ petition, It is stated that though he has completed fourteen years of imprisonment has not been released. On 3er^jce of notice, learned Dy. Advocate General has put in appearance. In the course of th©hearing, JearnQd Dy. Advocate G©n©ratwould submit that in view of the -altegations made in the letter necessary detaifs w^r^ sought from the Centrai Ja?t, Pune and the JaiE Authorities vide their tetter dated gr^j^ \"'. 22 -2.- 06/09/2005 have informed the State Authoritles here that the petitloner has not completed fourteen years of imprisonment. The very basis for seeking the relief is not existing and therefore, relief cannot be granted. The writ petifion is, therefore, dismissed. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge