1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL WRIT No. 6647 of 2007 UNITED INDIA INSU.CO. LTD & ANR. V/S D.J. SRIGANGANAGAR & ANR. Mr. PR SIKKA, Mr. MANOJ BHANDARI, for the appellant / petitioner Mr. NS ACHARYA, for the respondent Date of Order : 11.10.2007 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the impugned order. The petitioner wanted to produce 5 documents vide application Annex.4, out of them the learned trial Court has taken on record 4 documents, and has not said anything about document No.5. Learned counsel read to me the relevant para at page 75 of the paper book, wherein the learned trial Court has observed that the documents, which are original and/or certified copies, they have been taken on record, and photostat copies have been declined to be taken on record, and on this reasoning, the document No.5 has not been taken on record, while the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has produced the certified copy being document No.5, and not the photostat copy. 2 Learned counsel for the respondent also submits that if the document No.5 is the certified copy, he has no objection in taking it on record. However, if the document produced is photostat copy only, there is no ground to interfere with the impugned order. In my view, in view of the above stand of the learned counsel for respondent the writ petition is required to be and is disposed of with the clarification that if the document No.5 is the certified copy, the same shall be taken on record, and if it only be photostat, then the impugned order shall stand. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/