Cr.R.No.1197/2002 28.11.2011 The proceedings of the trial Court have been stayed by an interim order dated 14.1.2003 obtained in this revision. Today also, learned counsel is merely seeking an adjournment, which I am declined to allow because of the interim order which is operating in favour of the applicants. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant. This revision challenges the impugned order passed by the Magistrate taking cognizance of the offences under Sections 420 and 120-B of IPC. The defence to cognizance is apparently based upon lack of sanction under Section 197 of Cr.P.C. This aspect has been examined in the impugned order dated 7.8.2002 passed by the Magistrate. Placing reliance upon the Supreme Court Judgment passed in AIR 1979 SC 1841(S. B. Sahah Vs. M. SA. Cotcher), it has been held by the learned Magistrate that having regard to the nature of offence, no sanction was required under Section 197 of Cr.P.C. No such error has been shown in the impugned order which may call for interference in the revisional jurisdiction of this Court at this stage, however this issue will remain open after evidence. In these circumstances, the revision is dismissed. (Sushil Harkauli) Acting Chief Justice