IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26172 of 2009 GOBIND MAHTO @ GOBIND PRASAD KUSHWAHA,son of Paro Mahto,resident of village- Marpo,P.S.-Kowakol,Dist.-Nawada. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 07-12-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. To counter the attack by extremists Mukhiya’s house reaching of force was reacted by 100-150 extremists. There was firing and counter firing between the police force and the extremists. In that course one of the police officials injured who later died. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is not named in the FIR. For the first time his name appeared that miscreants of earlier incident had their hand in the instant incident also but in earlier incident petitioner was not named. Again it has come that in confidential information petitioner was one of the extremists but this confidential report is corroborated by a witness examined in pargraph- 35 of the case diary. So, if at earlier stage of the investigation reliable evidence was lacking is of no avail for the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition for anticipatory bail is rejected. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )