IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 18494 of 2006 Between: M/s. Haripriya Marine Exports Private Limited, Budharayudu Cheruvu, Konithiwada, rep by managing Partner, T. Venkateswara Rao S/o Prakasa Rao R/o Rest House Road, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District ..... PETITIONER AND Agriculture Market Committee, Palakol, West Godavari District, rep by Selection Grade Secretary. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring the action of the Respondent in returning the application submitted by the petitioner for grant of licence by virtue proceedings MF. No. 129/SRW/2001-02, dt 18-05-2006 and proceedings M.F. No. 129/sRW/2001-02 dt 17-07-2006 as illegal arbitrary, unreasonable, null and void and violative of Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and opposed to the very spirit and object of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966 and consequently direct the Respondent to consider the Application of the petitioner for grant of licence without insisting on payment of amount as mentioned in the proceedings MF. No. 129/SRW/2001-0,2 dt 18-5-2006 and proceedings M.F. No. 129/SRW/2001-02 dt 17-7-2006 issued by the Respondent and pass further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.V.SESHA SAI Counsel for the Respondent : MR.K.MADHAVA REDDY (SC FOR AGRL.MRKT.COMTTS) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO :18494 of 2006 ORDER: It is represented by Sri A.V. Sesha Sai, learned counsel for the petitioner that the grievance in the writ petition no longer subsists as the petitioner has been granted a licence. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J DATE: 11th August, 2008 pnb