IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 8117 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 8117 OF 2005 PETITION NO. 8117 OF 2005 M/s. Fruit & Vegetable Merchants Assn. ] .. Petitioners Versus 1. Shri Amit Shantaram Tambe & 11 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. N.V. Walawalkar with Mr. U.B. Nighot for the petitioners. Mr. V.A. Thorat, senior counsel with Mr. R.A. Thorat for respondents No.1, 3 and 5. Mr.C.J. Sawant, senior counsel with Mr. N.V. Bhadrashete i/b Mr. R.A. Tekale for respondents No.8 & 9. CORAM: R.M. LODHA & NARESH H. PATIL, JJ. DATED: 21ST JULY, 2006 P.C. : . Heard. 2. During the course of Motion hearing, the senior counsel for respondents No.8 and 9 submitted that with regard to 293 applications received for sanction of licence of A Class Traders, 214 applications have been sanctioned and 79 applications have been rejected. 3. In this view of the matter, we are satisfied : 2 : that the impugned order has been worked out and nothing remains to be decided by this Court in extra ordinary jurisdiction. However, if the petitioners feel aggrieved by the order of the respondent Nos.8 and 9 granting 214 applications and rejecting 79 applications, it may pursue appropriate remedy available to it in law for redressal of its grievance. 4. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- [R.M. [R.M. [R.M. LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] LODHA, J.] Sd/- [NARESH [NARESH [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] H. PATIL, J.] H. PATIL, J.]