IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 9844 of 2008. Decided on: 05.01.2011. __________________________________________________________ Anupama. … Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 5. Mr. Ajay Chandel, Advocate for respondent No.6. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. P.P. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner has now been gainfully engaged with effect from 28th January, 2004, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. January 05, 2011. (sck). 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?