IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1813 of 2009 Mamta Kumari, daughter and under the guardianship of Sakichan Paswan, resident of village-Heru Diyara, P.S.- Kasim Bazar, District- Munger. ………….Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Dablu Ram @ Dabbu Ram, son of Subak Ram, resident of village & P.S.-Haveli Kharagpur, District- Munger. …….Opposite Parties. ---------------------------------- 2. 08.12.2011 The informant petitioner has preferred this revision application against the judgment and order dated 16.09.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, III, Munger in Sessions Trial No.402/2007 arising out of Kharagpur P.S. Case No.19/2007 by which the accused opposite party no.2 has been acquitted from the charge under Sections 366 and 366A of the I.P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. While passing the order of acquittal through his judgment dated 16.09.2009, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, III, Munger has discussed the evidence produced on behalf of both the parties. After having heard the learned counsel for both the sides and after going through the judgment, I 2 find that the view taken by the learned Trial Judge was the probable view and in that light, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)