Crl. Misc. No.M-1812 of 2011 ::1:: IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. 9099 of 2011 and Crl. Misc. No.M-1812 of 2011 Date of decision: 25.02.2011 Sandeep Singh alias Sonu .. Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .. Respondent Present:- Mr.V.S. Rana, Advocate, for Mr.Gulzar Mohd., Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.M.C. Berry, Addl.A.G., Punjab. Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the complainant. * * * * S.S. SARON, J. CRM No. 9099 of 2011 The offence under Section 467 IPC which has been added by the police during investigation is added in the headnote of the petition. The Registry to carry out necessary correction in this regard. The criminal miscellaneous application stands disposed of. CRM No.M-1812 of 2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the headnote of the petitioner offence under Section 201-B has been inadvertently written and he may be allowed to correct it to Section 120-B IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct the same. Heard counsel for the parties. Crl. Misc. No.M-1812 of 2011 ::2:: The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered against him for the offence under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B IPC; besides, Section 467 IPC, which was added later. The FIR, in the case, has been registered on the complaint of Tota singh who has alleged that he had settled with Dasonda Singh for sending his son Gurdas Singh to Canada by paying an amount of Rs.3.85 lacs. The complainant gave an amount of Rs.1 lac to Jasbir Singh, Rs.2 lacs was deposited in the account of Sandeep Singh (petitioner) and Rs.85,000/- was deposited in the accounts of Dasonda Singh. However, three years have lapsed, neither the son of the complainant was sent abroad nor the money was returned. In terms of the order dated 24.12.2010 (Annexure P-2) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, it was observed that during investigation, the passbook of Sandeep Singh (petitioner) was recovered and an entry of Rs.1 lac was found in the same whereby cash was deposited on 15.10.2008 and it was subsequently withdrawn gradually on several dates through A.T.M. withdrawls. The matter has now been compromised. Mr. Sandeep Arora, learned counsel for the complainant, has submitted that both the parties have compromised the matter. Sandeep Singh alias Sonu (petitioner) has agreed to return the amount of Rs.1 lac after his release from custody. The compromise deed dated 27.01.2011 has been submitted in Court today, which is taken on record. The case is triable by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class. The trial in the case is likely to take time; besides, the parties have compromise the matter. In the facts and circumstances, the petitioner on his Crl. Misc. No.M-1812 of 2011 ::3:: furnishing personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court shall be admitted to bail. (S.S. SARON) February 25, 2011 JUDGE sukhpreet