(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.25789 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5408 OF 2001. Jayasing Dhondiram Rajput. ..Petitioner. Versus Versus Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors...Respondents. .... Mr.R.K. Mendadkar, Adv. for the Petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane,AGP for Respondents. .... CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. S.S. SHINDE, JJ. S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 4TH JULY, 2008. DATE : 4TH JULY, 2008. DATE : 4TH JULY, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Delay condoned. 2. We do not find that the order passed by this Court dated 4th April 2006 needs be reviewed before the Committee. The petitioner is not able to substantiate his claim that he belongs to Rajput Bhamta caste which he had claimed in his application. The only document he proved before the Committee is entry in the school relating to unmarried minor daughters of the petitioner and obviously, the petitioner himself had got his daughter admitted to school. (2) 3. Therefore, in our view, the order does not suffer from any error which is apparent on the face of the record. 4. The review is dismissed. [ BILAL NAZKI, J.] [ BILAL NAZKI, J.] [ BILAL NAZKI, J.] [ S.S.SHINDE, J.] [ S.S.SHINDE, J.] [ S.S.SHINDE, J.]