1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1280 OF 2009 IN APPEAL NO.526 OF 2003 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.500 OF 2003 IN SUIT NO.550 OF 2003 Ayushakti Ayurveded Pvt. Ltd. ..... Appellants & Ors. vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd. ..... Respondent Mr. V.R. Dhond, Sr.Counsel with Ms.Usha Chandrashekhar i/by Bhagwati & Co. for appellants. Mr. Sandeep Parekh i/by Craford Bayley & Co. for respondent. CORAM : J.N. PATEL & SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATED : 24th September, 2009. PC : 1. The appellants have taken out this Chamber Summons for seeking amendment to the Memo of Appeal. It is submitted that the plaint has already been amended after taking out Chamber Summons No.393 of 2009 in Suit No.550 of 2003, which has been allowed by the learned Single Judge by the order dated 24th June 2009. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent states that the amendment to the Memo of Appeal cannot be allowed as that may 2 affect the safeguards which have been provided by the learned Single Judge by allowing the amendment to the plaint. 3. In our view, amendment to the Memo of Appeal does not amend the plaint or affects amendment carried out in the plaint as permitted by the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge has already provided the safeguards while permitting the amendments. Therefore, we allow the Chamber Summons in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) with no order as to costs. Necessary amendments to be carried out within two week. (Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota,J.) (J.N. Patel, J.)