Him-I cguan’ OF cHHAmseAnH: mLAsPug Writ Pgtitipn (s) No. 6702 of 2W Petitioner Smt. Tarkeshwari Vaishnav Wife of shri Hanuman Prasad Vaishnav, aged about 31 years, resident of Podibhatha, 'Ward No1 Akaitara‘ District‘ Janjgir‘Champa (CG). Versus Respondents 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretaty, Department of Schoo Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 2) The Cotléctor and District Mission Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Janjgir, District Janjgir- , Champa(OG)t 3) The Biock Education Officer, Akaltara, District Janjgir—Champa (CG). 4) The District Project Coordinator, Rajiv Gandhi t Prathmik Shiksha Mission. Janjgir‘ District Janigir ‘ Champa(CG). 5) Thé Chief Municipai Officer, Akaitara, District Janjgir~Champa (CG). (Wrii Petition under Articie 226 of the Conwtution of india) SB: Hon’ble Mr. sah‘sh K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri V.K.Pandey, counseiforthe petitioner. Shri A‘S. K'achhawaha, Dy‘ Advocate Generai for the State. Shri Sanjay K. Agrawai, counsel for the respondent No.5: ORAL ORDER (Passed on 5-3-2008) By this petition, the petitioner seeks the foiiowing reiiefs‘ ”7.1 the Hon’bie Court may kindiy be pieased to issue notices to the respondents returnable within early date of hearing. 7.2. The Hon’bie Court may kindiy be pieased to direct the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation made by the petitionervwithin stiputated period in the ends of justice. 7.3. The Hon’bie Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other anoiliary relief. as it may deem fit and to proper in the Facts and circumstances of the case“. 2) So far as relief ciause 7.1. is concerned, the same has been granted as notice has been issued. With regard to clause 7.2, Shri A.S.Kaohhawaha, teamed l \I‘ Deputy Advocate Genera! appearing for the State submits that this relief may be granted. 3) In view of the foregoing, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation fried by the petitioner, if any pending, or if a representation is made, expeditiousiy as earlyas possible. 4) Accordingly} the petition is disposed of. Sdl— Satisii K. Agnihotri Judge