HIGH COURT OF CHHATTSGARH AT B!LAS?UR DIVISION BENCH OMM: HON’B‘LE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. & HON’BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAK%R, J. Misc. Appeai No.536 of 2093. 1 Shekhu Ram Namdeo, Sfo late Tirlo Ram, aged about 50 years, Nothing, R/a Occupation - Sattipara Ward at Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (Q.G.). Aggellant Claimant “L Janpati Bai, wlo Shekhu Ram, aged about 48 years, Occupation- Domestic work, R/o Sathipara Ward at ‘Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.). Versus ‘ Chandeshwareup‘ia, S/o Shabri Sac, Occupation - Vehicle wner, Resident of Village Belkota, P.S. Batoli, D‘istt. Surguja (CIG.). Owner of Vehicle's l l l espondent‘s ~ Oriental insurance Company, hrough Branch Manager, Oriental lnsurance Company, Sadar Road,-Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (0G. Insurer Santosh Gupta, S/o Chandra Shekhar Gupta, Occupation Driver, Rio Village Belkota, P.S. Batoli, Dlstt. Surguja (C.G.). Driver. Appeal U/S 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act. 1988. IC O R z T resent: None for the appellants. Shri D.N. Prajapati, counsel for respandent No.4. Shri P. Dutta, counsel for respondent No.2. None for respondent No.3 though served. ORDER (29m July. 2910) , The following order of the Court was passed by @e‘ev Gupta CJ: Nonerfor the appellants. "l 4 H1 a. ;Asthere .ls no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want o; prosecution. l 3?. T‘ne appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. 'l Sd/— Chief Justice , ig P