IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 2789 of 2011 Date of decision: 28.4.2011 Narinder Kaur and another … Petitioners versus Buta Singh and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR Present: Mr. Parveen K. Kataria, Advocate, for the petitioners ... ARVIND KUMAR, J: The present petitioners are the claimants in the claim petition under Section 66 of the Motor Vehicles Act for grant of compensation. The claim petition is titled as Narinder Singh and another v. Buta Singh and others. The claimants did not deposit the Munadi-fee, RC/AD for the service of respondent No.1 and as such, the petition was dismissed qua respondent No.1 on 30.3.2009. Subsequently thereto, the claimants filed another application for the amendment of the claim petition and for recalling of order dated 30.3.2009 wherein the Tribunal allowed the application for amendment of claim petition but declined the request for recalling of the order. Hence, this revision. Counsel for the petitioners contends that respondent No.1 being the owner of the vehicle is a necessary party and has also pointed out in the connection petition arising out of the same accident, namely, Kashmir Singh v. Buta Singh and respondent No.1 Buta Singh has been duly served therein and appearing and as such, the only prayer is that he be also served in this case. It has been brought out that all the claim petitions have been consolidated and as such, there should not be any difficulty for the trial C.R. No. 2789 of 2011 -2- Court to get effected service upon Buta Singh in this case as well. It is ordered accordingly. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. April 28, 2011 ( ARVIND KUMAR ) JS JUDGE