(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2985 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2985 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2985 OF 2004 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 121 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 121 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 121 OF 2004 J.I. Biradar Patil ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Shri. A.R. Pitale, Advo. for the applicant. Shri. A.P. Vanarase, A.G.P. for Respondents. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 21ST DECEMBER, 2004 DATED: 21ST DECEMBER, 2004 DATED: 21ST DECEMBER, 2004 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned A.G.P. for the Respondents. 2. By this Civil Application, the Applicant is seeking recalling of order dated 09.7.2004 whereby the above Writ Petition is dismissed in default. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of any omission, negligence or want of bonafide on the (-2-) part of the Applicant. In the circumstances, Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause 5(a) and 5(a-1). Place Writ Petition No. 121 of 2004 on board for admission on 18.1.2005.