(^,.^ ^,\",^ 5 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR W.P(Sl No.6454 OF RESPONDENTS PETiTIONER Mohd. Ishhac Ansari, s/o Late Shri Ahmed Anssri aged about 53 years, r/o Sarna, Block Wadrafnagar, Distt. Surguja (C.G) Versus State of Chattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). Collector, Sarguja, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja Ambikapur (C.G). Block Education Officer, Wadrafnagar, Surguja (C.G). 4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G) WRIT PETiTiON UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF 2 3. Appearance: Shri Manoj Paranjpe, counsel f or the petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Govt. Advocate, for the State/ respondents on advance copy. ORAL ORDER (OS.11.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SiNHA, J Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that in the transfer order, the designation of the petitioner has been shown as Assistant Teacher whereas the petitioner substantially holds the post of Headmaster. This is the only grievance ofthe petitioner. A perusal of the order dt. 22-7-2007 Annexure P-3 woutd show that the petitioner has been transferred from Primary Schoot Sarna, Wadrafnagar to the option of B.E.O., Sankargarh. Even ifthe petitioner holds the post of headmaster, presentiy that makes no difference because uniess the petitioner is directed to join at a lower post, a cause of action would not arise in favour of the petitioner. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawat ofthis petition. Prayer is allowed. This petition is permitted to be withdrav/n. Accordingly, it is dismissed as withdrawn.