1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1604 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1604 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1604 OF 2005 Mr. Champak Lakhamsingh Savla & Anr. ..Applicants. V/s. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent. ----- Shri B.K. Barve with Mr. H.V. Kode for the Applicants. Shri R.Y.Mirza, APP for the Respondent State. ----- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : MARCH 10, 2005 DATED : MARCH 10, 2005 DATED : MARCH 10, 2005 PC :- PC :- PC :- 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. This application is for modifying condition Nos. (A) and (D) of the bail order passed on 2nd February, 2005 in Criminal Application No. 418 of 2005. It is stated that inspite of the order, the applicants are not in a position to furnish the required bail bond P.R. and sureties. 3. In the peculiar facts of the present case, as father as well as the son - both are in custody, the bail condition is relaxed by requiring the applicants to furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- 2 (Rs. Twentyfive thousand only) each with two local sureties in the like amount. 4. It will be open to the applicants to furnish surety from Navi Mumbai, which will be treated as local sureties. 5. In so far as condition No. (D) of the said order is concerned, it is clarified that the applicants shall not travel outside New Mumbai or Greater Mumbai without prior intimation to the investigating officer and the trial court. 6. The applicants shall be entitled to furnish cash bail for a period of 15 days to be replaced by the appropriate sureties within that time. 7. Rest of the conditions in the order dated 2nd February, 2005 to remain as it is. 8. Application is disposed of in the above terms. .....