IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 28TH DECEMBER 2007 / 7TH POUSHA 1929 RP.No. 1272 of 2007(W) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.36944/2007 Dated 13/12/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER --------------------------------------------- THE MANAGER, ST.XAVIER'S CENTRAL SCHOOL, MANGALAM DAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678 708. BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: -------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPT. OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD. 4. THE SECRETARY, CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, DELHI. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. REMANI T.B. SRI. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN -SC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN,J ============================= R.P.No.1272 of 2007 in W.P.(C).No.36944 of 2007 =============================== Dated this the 28th day of December, 2007 ORDER By this review petition the petitioner seeks correction of the judgment dated 13.12.2007 in the writ petition wherein a direction was issued to the DEO to consider the application submitted by the petitioner for No Objection Certificate in respect of his school within two weeks. The petitioner submits that the DEO has already forwarded his report to the first respondent and it is the first respondent who is to consider the application for No Objection Certificate now. In the above circumstances, the second sentence in paragraph 2 of my judgment would stand substituted as follows: “Accordingly there would be a direction to the first respondent to consider the application submitted by the petitioner for No Objection Certificate in respect of his school, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment in accordance with the orders in the writ appeal referred to above.” The review petition is disposed of as above. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE dvs