^^»»»w»W#»».tf?S-c.i »iK.Iri^fcjKlKl IN THE HIGH COURT OFJUDiCATURE. CHHATnSCARH AT BILASPUR w.p.d^ /o<2- QF29e6cT7 SSNSL PETITIONER f-S^ ^•J" : t ^^ d^ RESPQNDENTS id Kumar Saraswat, S/o-A.K.Saraswat, Lecturer (Incharge Principal) Aged about 39 Gpvt. Higher Secondary School, Rakhi R/0-ManaCamp I)istt-Raipur(C.G.) VERSUS 1. ^ Govt. ofChhattisgarh Through Secretary School Education Department, MaDtraIaya D.K.S. Bhavan ...•^S^f / Raipur (C.G.) ;:^^^'^;''1/.: '.•'•': : :': • ."^0?^·''^ ,u^'. ;Q^''n^* ^'2^ Director, ^%.^"^ Public Instructions Deptt. ^••^y 'Mrecto^te^ <i?w' - Directorate, Raipur (C.G.) ./<^^ ^•^p^ ^ '<&° Distt. Education Officer, Distt.-Raipur(C.G.) SKRIT PETITIONUNDERARTICLE 226/3^ OETHECONSTITUTIONOF Itndia FORISSUANCE C SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS, DIRECTION ETC. -fe HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BIUISPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNtHOTRI. J. WMT PETmON (5.) No.88 OF 2007 Petitjoner : Shrimati Aarti Das versus Respondents Govt. of Chhatl-isgarh wid others Pfctitjoner WMT PETTTION fS.) No.89 OF 2007 5utya Prakash Pandey wrsjs Rewondents 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh ond others WRTT PETTTION (S.) No.90 OF 2007 Petitioner : Shrinwti Souri Oas verais Respondents 6ovt. of Chhorttisgarh and others WRTT PETTTION (S.) No.91 OF 2007 PetHioner : Horen Chandra Bhukta yersys ftespondents 6ovt. of Chhatt-isgorh ond others WRTT PETTTION (5.) No.92 OF 2007 Petitioner : Jogdish Chandni Majumdur versys Respondents 6ovt. of Chhatl-isgarh cnd others WRTT PETmON (S.) No.93 OF 2007 Petitioner : Ranbir Kannakar versus Respondents 6ovt. of ChhatHsgarh and others WMT PETTTION (S.) No.94 OF 2007 Petitioner : KunKu-i Shefali AAajumdar yersus Respondents 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh ond others € WMT PETmON (S.) No.950P 2007 Petitioner ; Nirnwl Chandra Atallik versus ResDondents : 6ovt. of Chhutl'isgarh and others Petitioner WRTT PFTTTION fS.l N0.960F2007 Narayan Chtmdra Biswas versus Respondents : 6ovt. of Chhattisgarh and others And Petitioner WRTT PETTTION tS.) No. 102 OF 2007 Anond Kumar Saraswat verajs Respondents : 6ovt. of ChhattiS9arh and others Present : AAr. A.H. Siddiqui, counsel for the petitioner(s). Ms. Sunita Jain, Paaiel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on this 16* day of January, 2007) Laimed counset appearing for the petitioners as well as for the Stixte/respondents jointly submit •that the focts and question of law» 'mvolved in Ihe present wit petitions are squarely covered by the ^ decision of this Courl- m the case of yasfmrwff Kumw Bharadwoj vs. ^fanfcijM/ Carperatlon. t>wy and aiwthe^. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, -these writ petH-ions are disposed of in terms of the decision of this Courl- m -the matter of ya^ivmnt Kimar BhouvvtwaJ (Supro), subject- to verificatjon of the fnct as to whelher -Ihe petitioners have acquired B.Ed./B.TJ. Cert-ificates at their <wn expenses os per the circulars dated 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether •they have been paid Iwo advance hcrements or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be phced on the record of the connected writ petttions. _ _ _-_ Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge 1 2006CI3)MPJR-C696 Subhuh