S1423.09 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 1423 OF 2009 Polygel Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd. ...Plaintiffs. Vs. Mohan Pillai & Anr. ...Defendants. Mr. Vatsal Shah i/by M/s. Advani & Co. for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Hiren Mehta i/by Akshay Vani for Defendant No.1. Mr. G.S. Bhargava i/by M/s. J.K. Juris & Associates for Defendant No.2. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 29th JANUARY, 2010. P.C.- 1 The Plaintiffs and Defendant No.2 have filed the consent terms and is already taken on record on 28th January, 2010. The same is already marked as “X”. 2 The Plaintiffs and Defendant No.1 have also arrived at settlement and accordingly filed the consent terms dated 29th January, 2010, signed by the Plaintiffs and Defendant No.1 and their respective advocates. The consent terms is taken on record and marked as “Y”. There is no dispute with regard to the signatures, identity and authorization. The statement is made that the Consent Terms is well within the frame work of law and the record. S1423.09 2 2 Considering the fact that both the parties i.e. Plaintiffs and Defendants have settled the matter though by separate consent terms, the suit is disposed of in view of these consent terms. 3 The refund of Court fee, if any, in accordance with law. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)