- B<1. IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P.NO. bSLCi 12011 Sing— •BHCn APPLICANT : Smt. Ramkali, W/o. Sanwatram Janghel, Aged about 55 years, / R/o. Sahadevnagar, Ward no. 19, ^*^.. . - . ,.......^^'^--i/~~— Rajn.andgaon (C.G.) VERSUS NON-APPLICANT Ssnwatram Janghel, S/o. Late Derha Prasad, Janghel, Aged about 65 years, R/o. Sahade\Tiagar, Ward No. 19, Rajnandgaon, (C.G.), Presently R/o. Station Lodhipara, Raipur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER SECTIOK 4SSyOF'T!EB CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEnURE ^ *n*iciT a»*(ra> 3^ '^WM^, W-^V'IG, hviwy -)y<jy. ^^n 'Jf^ 200 aii^i tra^ ('yl^'i^ti^ SRI^HV ft-ll<* ^PfT 3n^?T tfttiiqi wt TOIW ^lftd 3B^I -;J. SB: Hon'bte Shri Mantndra Moh.iin Shrivastava. A <n<<fCT<ill IwS ^ fttA <[;a|«;l< . ^? siRiH gn^i 22.09-2011 Shri Saurabh Dangi, counse? for the peWoner. Heard. ! ;^ - .Leatned.counsel for ttie p^Utiona' subraits ttiat the petUoner moved an application-for grant of maintenan^e under SecUon 125 CrPC and also moved an application"tor gnant of interim maihtenanee on the ground ttrat as the applicart is ant>ia tacfy, she is not able to mair|tain hereetf and there is no sourae of income to maintain hereelf. It fs submitted that the learried femily Court did not consider the ^pect ttiat if no interim maintenance is grantejd to Uie petltioner, who is aged about 58 yea's, k it would be ditficult for her to survis(e and the Court below has gone into the issues without there being any evidence ojn record to reject the applieaUon. Tata'ng into conslderation t^ submissions made by teamed eounsai fortha petitioner and that the case is d|rected to be iisted for recording evidaice on 16/09/2011, instead of tnterferinglwith the order rejecting applicafiert tor iBtarim maintenance, it is directed that ths| Qouit below shall make ali endeavor to dedde the application for grant of maint^nanceto the petih'wier within an euter Iftnit of three months from the date of rec^ipt of copy af this order. If on acceunt of non- sco-opetation.byttie resppndent or ^ilure to produce his vwtnesses for examiration, there is detay in deciding th®app(ication for grant of maintenance, the petittoner wouid Be'at li6erty to revjve th^ application for grant of interim majrtwiaice rimmiediaSly'after'expiry ofthree mt>nttis as stated abov®. With the aforesaid observ^tions/directions, th®petiUon is finally dsposed off. , : . 1 . —— Sd/- e Manindra Mohan Shrivastava j Judge ws<e\v Stis yftiil^y, BiTi emg—i's/l40—2/20t1—1 ,50,000.