IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.511 of 2007 Surendra Agrawal alias Surendra Kumar Agrawal, son of Banarsi Lal, Resident of Mauza Main Road Padrauna Tappa, Pakari Gagrani, P.S. and P.O. Padrauna District Deowaria now Kushi Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. ….Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner. Versus 1. Bihar State Construction Corporation Ltd. , Kathkuiyan Road, Padrauna, P.S. and Padrauna, District Dewaria, now Kushi Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, through the Executive Manager present address Bihar State Construction Corporation Ltd., 22C Sri Krishnapuri, Patna now near Mahesh High School, Anishabad, P.S. and P.O. Gardanibagh, Patna, District Patna. 2. Bihar State Construction Corporation Ltd., through its Managing Director, 22C Sri Krishnapuri, Patna at present near Mahesh High School, Anishabad, Town and District Patna. …Defendants-Respondents-Opposite Parties. ----------- For the Petitioner : M/s Arjun Prasad Singh, Kundan Bahadur Singh and Dronacharya, Advocates For the Opp. Parties : None. ------- 03/ 02.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This civil revision has been filed by the plaintiff- petitioner challenging order dated 17.11.2006, by which learned Subordinate Judge-III, Patna rejected Misc. Case No. 06 of 2003 and refused to review its earlier judgment dated 15.01.2003 passed in Money Suit No. 25 of 1988. 3. The aforesaid suit was filed by the plaintiff- petitioner against the defendants-opposite parties for a decree of Rs.1,16,858.40 with interest pendente lite and future on the grounds that he was awarded a contract for supply of boulders for Piprasi Bundh from Varanasi City to Salempur Railway Station which he supplied and on oral order got the stackings done and measured by 2 the Deputy Engineer and he was paid Rs.5000.00 on 21.01.1985 and Rs.20,000.00 on 31.01.1985 by cheque, but the remaining dues was not paid despite repeated letters. 4. It transpires that the said suit was contested, whereafter issues were framed, evidence were led and was finally dismissed by the learned Subordinate Judge-III, Patna, vide his judgment and decree dated 15.01.2003. 5. The plaintiff-petitioner filed Misc. Case No. 06 of 2003 under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for review of the aforesaid judgment of the trial court and after considering the entire claim of the plaintiff-petitioner and materials on record the learned court below dismissed the said miscellaneous case vide its order dated 17.11.2006, which is under challenge in the instant civil revision. 6. From the impugned order of the learned court below, it is apparent that there was neither any error apparent on the face of the record of the case nor any fresh material was produced, which was not available with the petitioner earlier nor this Court finds any other reason to direct the learned court below to review the said order. 7. Accordingly, this Court does not find any illegality in the impugned order of the learned court below nor does it find any jurisdictional error therein. Accordingly, this civil revision is dismissed. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )