1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.70 OF 2010 Shantabai Yashwant Khade (since deceased through L.R.) Smt.Shobha J. Patil ...Petitioner vs. Vasudev Keshav Khade ...Respondent Mr.S.A.Rajeshirke for the petitioner None for the respondent. CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JANUARY 21, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order dated 20 th July 2009 passed by the Appellate Court. On the application made by the respondent-plaintiff, by the impugned order, a document on which the respondent has relied upon has been ordered to be impounded. 2 The petitioners cannot have any grievance about the impounding of the document. The learned counsel for the petitioner has invited my attention to the following observation made in the impugned order: ...Merely because document is insufficiently stamped it cannot be said that it is inadmissible... It is, obvious that the said observations are in the context of the provisions of section 34 of the Bombay Stamps Act,1958. The issue of admissibility of a document which is insufficiently stamped is governed by section 34 of the said Act. 3 Subject to clarification made above, Writ Petition is not entertained and the same is disposed of. JUDGE