IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.12339 of 2011 Sri Amir Chand Prasad ,Head Master, Chandrika Prasad Sanskrit Primary-cum-Middle School, Murakhap, son of Late Chandrika Prasad, Residence of village-Baluwa Mathia,P.S.-Daruli, District-Siwan. ……….. Petitioner. Versus 1The State of Bihar through the Director (Secondary), Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Special Director (Secondary), Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Bihar Sanskit Siksha Board, Bihar Patna through the Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board, Bihar, Patna. 5. The District Education Officer, Siwan. …………..Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2 03.08.2011 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and also learned counsel appearing for the Bihar Sanskrit Siksha Board. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inspite of a clear cut direction by the respondent no.2 to the respondent no.4 for getting an enquiry made with regard to the school in question and accordingly take appropriate action, under letter no. 108 dated 02.06.2011, no action has been taken. He further submits that by way of abundant precaution the petitioner has also filed a petition before the concerned respondent no.4 on 21.6.2011 for complying with the directions contained in the letter no.108 dated 02.6.2011.His grievance is that the respondent no.4 is not taking any interest in the matter, 2 resulting in non compliance of the directions contained in the said letter which has resulted in prejudice to the concerned institution. Upon hearing the parties, this Court finds that the situation is very unfortunate .Inspite of the respondents being under an obligation to decide the issues were not serious and sitting tight over the matter which compelled the petitioner to move before the said Director (Respondent no.2), who also passed an order to respondent no.4 for getting an enquiry made and then take action accordingly. Be that as it may this Court feels that the writ petition can be disposed off at this stage itself. In view of the discussions made above, this Court directs the respondent no.4 to comply with the directions contained in letter no.108 dated 02.6.2011 as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a maximum period of four months from the date of production/receipt of a copy of the order upon him. He will ensure that all the parties are heard and a reasoned order passed within the aforesaid period. With the aforementioned directions this writ petition stands disposed off. Sudha ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)