HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILAS?UR WE’. N0. 1362] 199’? PETITIOIEER Shri MP. Gupta, Aged 36 yaars, Sfo Ram Kxipai Gupta, DeSignation Assistant Sub— 111p3€ct013 Krishi Upaj Mandi, Sarangarh, Distick Rajnandgaon Versus CoHector, Raigarh (Raigarh) 2 Shn‘ P. 3. $ikarwar, Food OEcer, Raigarh. 3. Director, Mandi Arear H1315, Bhopal. - RESPONEENT$ WRIT PETI’HON UNDER ARTICLE 226 GF THE CONSTETUTION OF INDIA Appeaxance: No 0116 alapsars for the petitioner when the matter is caJled out. Ms. Sunita Jain, Pa_n€1 Lawyér for {ma Stats/respond€nt No. 1, Collector, Raigarh. Nona for the othér resp0nc1ents. QRAL GRBER {1 1. 19.2007; $UNIL KUMAR Sim-m, J. ThiS matter waS Iticeivai on transfm‘ from tho High Court of Madhya Pradosh, Jabalpur. it was listed for tho tirstr timo bofore this Court on / 197.2007. Since nobody has caused appearalme on behajf of the petitioner on the saitt oats, this Court (iirected for issuance of SPC. to the petitioner as Weilas to respondems No. 2 6:; 8. As per the order, SPC was issued but, 110 representation has been made even after issuance of the SPC. A perusal of the record shows that this petition was tiled for quashment of the order of suspension dated 11.3.1997 (Annexure A— l). The reply on behalf of responcients was filed on / W.P.(S) No. 1362/1997 7.7.1997. A perusal of the réply would Show that the suspension of the patitioner Was rsvoked by ordar data]. 5.7.1997 by raspondent No.1 and he was pumshed uncisr Rule 10 of the Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control &, Appeal) Ruies, 1966 and 2 increments have been‘withheld with cmnulative effect and it was further directed that the petitioner shall not be entitlea for salami 0f the‘suspension period. A copy of the order has been filed as Annextlre R— 1. 1n View of the above return iiied by the respondents on 7.7. 1997 and also in View of the fact that the suspension of the 1.; petitioner was revoked and further that a fmal order was passed under the aforesaid Rules, in the opinion ofvthis Court, nothing survives for prosecution of this petition. In light of the facts and circumstances of this case, particularly in Eight of the reply filed by the State, this petin'on has become infructuous. It deserves to be dismissed being int'ructuous. Accordingly, it is dismissed as infructuous. \x i r A— sir: §unit Kuma §inha Jutlge