THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 176 of 2009 Ajay Gupta and another …… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ..…. Respondents Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. 2. Correction & amendment application No. 2489 of 2009 is allowed. 3. Let the necessary correction be carried out during the course of the day in the body of the petition. 4. Let the order dated 24/03/2009 be corrected accordingly. 5. Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Brief Holder submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioners has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case submitted the chargesheet against the petitioners before the Circle Officer concerned and the Circle Officer concerned is likely to submit the same before the court concerned in the near future. 6. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 7. Interim order dated 24.03.2009 shall remain operative till the submission of the chargesheet before the court concerned. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 06.04.2009 Shiv