IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15594 of 2009 ASHOK BAITHA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 22.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This petition for bail has been filed by the petitioner, who is an accused for offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 506, 427, 387 and 307 of the Penal Code as well as sections 4/5 of the Explosive Substance Act and 17 of the C.L.A. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and there is general and omnibus allegation against several accused persons including the petitioner and Mahendra Singh that they have demanded Rangdari amount. He further submits that although in the first information report it is claimed that some persons were injured, there is no injury report. He also states that similarly situated accused person, namely, Mahendra Singh has already been enlarged on bail on the order of this Court dated 20.02.2006 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 699 of 2006. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the arguments of the parties, this petition is allowed. Accordingly, let the sole petitioner, namely, Ashok Baitha be enlarged on bail on executing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 312 of 2005. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )