IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2008 / 27TH ASHADHA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 878 of 2008(S) ------------------------------ ( AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.4232/2005 Dated 07/02/2005 ) PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS 1 AND 4 TO 19: -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. JOSE P. KALLOOPARAMBIL, 52, S/O PHILIPH, DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY, ST. MICHAEL'S COLLEGE, CHERTHALA, 2. P.N. VISHNURADHAN, AGED 52, S/O NARAYANAN NAMBOOTHIRI, LECTURER SENIOR GRADE DO...DO.. 3. K.N. NEELAKANTAN NAMBOOTHIRI, AGED 50, S/O . NARAYANAN NAMBOODIRI, LECTURER SELECTION GRADE, DEPARTMENT OF HINDI DO.....DO..... 4. K.C. SUKUMARAN ACHARI, AGED 54, S/O CHAMIKOTTU ACHARI, LECTURER SELECTION GRADE, DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS DO.....DO.... 5. T.J.JAMESKUTTY, AGED 50, S/O JOSEPH, LECTURER SELECTION GRADE OF DO... 6. P.A. VARGHESE, AGED 50, S/O ABRAHAM, LECTURER SELECTION GRADE, DO.... DO.... 7. RAJU XAVIER, AGED 46, S/O THOMAS, LECTURER SELECTION GRADE DO.... DO.... 8. MARGRET ISSAC, AGED 53, D/O ISSAC, LECTURER SELECTION GRADE, DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY, DO.. 9. PIOUS MATHAI, AGED 52, S/O K.M. KUNJUKUNJU, LECTURER SELECTION GRADE, DO....DO.... Con.Case(C).No. 878 of 2008(S) 10. ANNIE JOSE K., AGED 46, D/O JOSEPH KOYIPARAMBIL, LECTURER SENIOR GRADE, DO...DO... 11. SHEELA MADONA M., AGED 52, D/O GEORGE MATHEW, LECTURER SELECTION GRADE, DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH DO... DO... 12. A.B. JOHN JOSEPH, AGED 47, S/O. AUGUSTINE BENCHAMINE, LECTURER SELECTION GRADE, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS DO... DO... 13. RIJU GREGORY, AGED 35, S/O GREGORY K. , LECTURER SENIOR GRADE DO...DO... 14. V. MATHEW, AGED 36, S/O VARGHESE, LECTURER SENIOR GRADE, DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH OF DO....DO.... 15. CHERIAN J.KATTOZHAM, AGED 51, S/O. JACOB JOSEPH, LECTURER SELECTION GRADE, DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY DO.... DO.... 16. K.G. THADEVOOSE, AGED 33, S/O K.A. GEORGE,LECTURER SENIOR GRADE, ` DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS DO.....DO.... 17. ANGELLA JOAN THOMAS, AGED 47, D/O A.S. THOMAS, LECTURER SENIOR GRADE, DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH, DO.... BY ADV. SRI.J. OM PRAKASH RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------------------- P. BABU, WORKING AS THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. SHRI A.J VARGHESE. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T. SANKARAN, J. ............................................................................ CONTEMPT CASE (C) No. 878 OF 2008 ............................................................................ Dated this the 18th July, 2008 J U D G M E N T Complaining that the respondent has wilfully and deliberately disobeyed the orders issued by this court in W.P.(C) 4232 of 2005, the petitioners have approached this court by this Contempt Case. According to the petitioners, Annexure-B communication dated 04.06.2008 issued by the respondent to the Principal of the College would indicate that he has not complied with the directions contained in the judgment. 2. Learned Government Pleader, on instruction, submits that the Deputy Director of Collegiate Education has passed an order dated 21.06.2008, a copy of which was handed over to me for perusal. It is submitted that the order dated 21.06.20098 would result in full compliance of Annexure-A judgment in W.P.(C) 4232 of 2005. Though Writ Petition No.4232 of 2005 and Annexure-B communication are not referred to in the order dated 21.06.2008, I accept the submission made by the Government Pleader that the petitioners will get the benefit of Annexure-A judgment and that there will be no difficulty in implementing Annexure-A judgment. It is also submitted by the Government Pleader that the respondent would fully comply with the directions contained in the judgment. Placing on record the submission made by the Government Pleader, the Contempt Case is closed. It is made clear that if and when CONTEMPT CASE (C) No. 878 OF 2008 2 occasion arises, the petitioners would be entitled to approach this Court again if they are aggrieved by non-implementation of Annexure-A judgment. They are also free to challenge the order dated 21.06.2008 appropriately. With the above observations, the Contempt Case is closed. K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE. lk