CR No. 4757 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No. 4757 of 2010 Date of decision:- 15.02.2011 Sita Ram ....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL ****** Present:- Mr. Tarunveer Vashist, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Moudgil, DAG, Punjab. A.N. JINDAL, J (ORAL) The petitioner has invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 15.05.2010 (Annexure P-3) passed by the executing Court, whereby the execution petition filed by the Decree Holder- petitioner has been adjourned sine-die. The counsel for the petitioner states that there is no stay on the judgment to be executed and the Decree Holder never made any such statement that the decree passed by the Additional District Judge, Patiala, had been complied with. Counsel for the respondent-State has also not disputed the fact that there is no stay with regard to the execution of the judgment and decree. The order passed by the High Court dated 16.10.2003 is reproduced as under:- “Heard. I have gone through the Judgment dated 17.1.2000 CR No. 4757 of 2010 2 passed by the Ld. Addl. Distt. Judge, Patiala. There is no illegality in granting additional increment to the respondent. No case is made out for the grant of stay. Hence, it is dismissed.” In this view of the matter, this execution petition could not be ordered to be consigned sine-die. Resultantly, this petition is accepted. Impugned order dated 15.05.2010 (Annexure P-3) is set aside. The trial Court is directed to proceed in accordance with law and dispose of the execution petition as expeditiously as possible. (A.N.JINDAL) 15th of February, 2011 JUDGE ajp