IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SA No.254 of 2004 YUGAL PRASAD SAFI Versus SUNDER SAFI & ORS ----------- 12/ 15.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant-appellant/ In a suit for declaration of title and confirmation of possession and in alternative for recovery of possession if the plaintiff is found to be dispossessed from the suit land during the pendency of the suit and for other ancillary reliefs, both the learned courts below have specifically reached to the conclusion after considering the evidence on record that the plaintiff has failed to prove the possession of Champa Devi and Prem Safi over the property left by Musharu. It was also concurrently found that the statements of P.Ws. along with the statements of D.Ws. clearly proved that the defendants did not dispossess the plaintiff from the suit land rather the plaintiff was not in possession of the suit land and the defendants have been coming in possession thereof since long. In view of the aforesaid concurrent findings of fact, this Court does not find any substantial question of law involved in this second appeal, which is, accordingly, dismissed. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )