CRP 71/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.D.AGARWAL This revision application is directed against the order dated 08.12.2010 passed by the learned District Judge, Dibrugarh in title Appeal No. 34 of 2010 whereby the learned District Judge has rejected the interim prayer of the appellant to d irect the ASEB to restore power connection in the factory premises of the appell ant. Heard Mr. PJ Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. BD Das, learned Senior counsel for the ASEB. The matter relates to assessment bill dated 12.04.2002 for payment of Rs. 1, 96, 704/-. The bill has been raised against the appellant with an allegation that t here was malpractice. Sri Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the trial o f the suit realization of the money was stayed since the plaintiff/appellant had already deposited the statutory amount of Rs. 47,176/- . However, after the dis missal of the suit, the learned District Judge had issued notice upon the respon dents and in the meanwhile the electric connection was disconnected. Thereafter, the prayer for restoration of electricity connection was renewed but the same has been rejected. Upon hearing the learned counsel for both the sides, the impugned order is set a side. The respondent ASEB is directed to restore the electricity connection subj ect to payment of balance amount of bill in four equal installments within a per iod of 4(four) months from today. The ASEB shall restore the connection immediat ely on payment of the first installment. It is made clear that if the entire pay ment is not deposited within the four months, the ASEB shall be at liberty to di sconnect the electricity connection again. With the aforesaid directions, the revision petition stands disposed of .