: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6295 OF 2009 Nandkishor Dattatraya Kadam ... Petitioner Vs 1. State of Maharashtra & 2 ors. ... Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO.189/2009, 216/2009, 235/2009, 241/2009, 280.2009, 432/2009, 474/2009, 4621/2009, 5157/20095422/2009, 5557/2008, 7322/2009 AND WRIT PETITION NO. 7412/2008. Mr. R.K. Mendadkar for the petitioners. Mr. Vinay Masurkar, GP, with Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP for the responden- State. Mr. Vineet Naik, Special Counsel for the respondent No.3 in Writ Petition No.5157 of 2009. Mr. R.D. Rane for the respondent No.3 in Writ Petition No.4621 of 2009. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & R.M. SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2009. COMMON P.C.: 1. Rule. Rule with the consent of the parties, made returnable forthwith. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. : 2 : 2. For the reasons stated by this court in the order dated 1st September 2009 while disposing of Writ Petition No.8413 of 2008 alongwith other Writ Petitions, we set aside the impugned orders passed by the Scrutiny Committee in respect of each of the Petitioners in the above Petitions and remit the matters back to the Scrutiny Committee and direct the Government to appoint a Member and Research Officer as per the provision of the said Act and as directed by the Apex Court in the judgment of Madhuri Patil, and thereafter the cases of the Petitioners shall be decided by the Scrutiny Committee. A proper Scrutiny Committee shall be constituted within a period of three weeks from date. After constitution, the Scrutiny Committee shall dispose of the matters of the Petitioners within a period of eight weeks thereafter on their own merits and in accordance with law. 3. The above Petitions are disposed of by making Rule absolute in the above terms. Sd/- Sd/- (R.M. SAVANT, J.) (S.B. MHASE, J.)