HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH Coram : HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEIIéUPTA, C.J. & HON’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. ’M.c.c. Fiance of 2004 Gram Panchayat Jharra, Through: the Sarpanch, Shri Sunder La! Kashyap, S/o Shri Chinta Ram Kashyap, Aged about 45 years, Janpad Panchayat Bamhanidih, m District Janjgeer-Champa, (C.G.). Versus PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). 2. The Zila Panchayat, Janjgeer— Champa, Through: The Chief Executive Officer, District Janjgeer-Champa, (C.G.). 3. The CoilectOr, District Janjgeer— Champa, (C.G.) The Assistant Director, Fishery industries, . Janjgeer-Champa, District Janjgeer—Champa (C.G.) Smt. Khemin Bai,‘ W/o Shri Sunau, Aged about 35 years, Secretary, Mahila Swasahayata Samuh, Gram Panchayat Jharra, Janpad Panchayat Bamhanidih, District Janjgeer-Champa, (C.G.)._ 6. Dileshwar Prasad, S70 Shri Sunahar, Aged about 35 years, President, Purusha Swasahayata Sam’uh, Bajargudi Chouk, Gram Panchayat Jharra, § Janpad Panchayat Bamhanidih, District Janjgeer Champa, (C.G.). AE?LIQAIIQN,FQR,§.E_STO.W_.9AI_QEJ_H§ ' we. No. 1821/2003 Present: Ms" Purnima Singh, learned counsel on behalf Z‘ Shri Rajesh Pandey, seamed counsel for the petitioner. / Shri Sumesh Bajaj, learned Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondents No.1, 3 & 4. \ 0 R D E R (20m October, 2008) The following order of the Court was passed by ’ Rajeev Gupta, C.J.: Learned counsel for the parties are heard on M.(C.)P. : No.1274l2004, a petition for condonation of delay in filing the ‘ restoration petition. I ‘ 2. On due consideration, M.(C.)P.No.1274/2DO4 is allowed and the delay in filing the restoration petition is hereby condoned. 3. Learned counsel for the parties are heard on the restoration petition. 4. The petitioner is seeking restoration of WP No.1821f2003, which came to be dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 3‘; ”‘1‘? 7' * 21 .1 1 .2003. whereby the petitioner was directed to deposit a sum of ; Rs.50/- as cost with the High Court Bar Association, Bilaspur. u 5. The amount of Rs.50i-, directed to be deposited vide order dated 21.11.2003 within two weeks of the passing of the order, however, was deposited by the petitioner on 30.07.2004. 5. > On due consideration. M.C.C. No.109/2004 is ailowed and WP l\lo. 1821/2003 is restored to its original nWgt, .Wi . sdl— \ I ' CHIEF Sdj' JUSTICE t X (”My ’5" .S‘“\'\\ Kumar Sinha-rg Ll padma r ~ r w ’ ’ t f ///. Jadge /‘. \ ‘ i ‘ v/ a ‘. ,/”""’/