1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 317 OF 2005 Sakaharam Mahadeorao Sorte v. Jt. Charity Commr. & ors. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders Mr.A.C. Dharkadhikari Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Parhiar, A.G.P. for Respondent no.1. Mr.Gosavi Advocate for Respondents 2 & 3. Mr.Paliwal Advocate for Respondent No. 4. .... CORAM: A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 10 th AUGUST, 2007. Heard Mr.Dharmadhikari, learned counsel for the petitioner who vehemently opposes the submissions made by Mr.Paliwal, learned counsel for respondent no.2, that the present petition is rendered infructuous. Mr.Gosavi, learned counsel for respondents 2 & 3 and Mr.Paliwal, learned counsel for respondent no.4, submitted that this Court by the order dated 19.6.2006 had directed the 2 Joint Charity Commissioner to decide the main proceedings and the same has been decided on 12.9.2006 and appeal against that decision has already been preferred before the appellate authority. It is then stated at Bar that the ad hoc trustees- respondents 2 to 4 who were appointed on the basis of the order impugned in this petition, shall not claim any right based on that order in any proceedings. On this statement being made, Mr.Dharmadhikari also agrees that the present petition has become infructuous. Petition is therefore dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. JUDGE /TA/