1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.09.2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.(MD).No.11410 of 2011 Y.Sundar Raj ... Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of School Education, (Higher Secondary), Fort. St. George, Chennai. 2.The Director of School Education, E.V.K.Sampath Maligai, D.P.I.Campus, Chennai. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 4.The District Educational Officer, Thukkalay, Kanyakumari District. 5.The Secretary and Correspondent, Bapuji Memorial Higher Secondary School, Manavalakurichi, Kanyakumari District-629 252. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.09.2011 in the light of the judgment dated 26.06.2008 passed in W.A.Nos.291 and 292 of 2008 on the file of this Honourable Court. For Petitioner :: Mr.R.Subramanian For Respondents :: Mr.S.Chandrasekar Government Advocate for R-1 to R-4 O R D E R Mr.S.Chandrasekar, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 1 to 4. By consent of both parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2.The petitioner claims that he was appointed as a P.G.Assistant in Physics on 02.06.1986. His grievance is that the salary for the period between 02.06.1986 and 31.05.1989 was not paid to him. He has made representations on 21.02.2011, 19.05.2011 and recently on 05.09.2011 in this regard to the respondents. Since the said representations have not been so far considered and disposed of by the respondents, the petitioner has come forward with this writ petition, seeking for appropriate direction. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the Judgment passed by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD) Nos.291 and 292 of 2008 dated 26.06.2008, the petitioner is entitled for the above relief. 4.W.A.(MD)Nos.291 and 292 of 2008 relate to some other teachers, who according to the petitioner are also similarly placed like the petitioner. In my considered opinion, whether the petitioner is entitled for the relief sought for in the writ petition or not and whether the observations made by the Division Bench in W.A.(MD)Nos.291 and 292 of 2008 (cited supra) are applicable to the petitioner or not are all matters to be decided by the Director of School Education, Chennai by thoroughly analysing the facts and circumstances of the case. 5.In view of the above, without expressing any opinion as to whether the petitioner is entitled for the relief sought for in this writ petition or not, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 21.02.2011, 19.05.2011 and 05.09.2011 and pass appropriate orders by considering the Judgment in W.A.(MD)Nos.291 and 292 of 2008 dated 26.06.2008 strictly on merits and in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (C.O) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S) To: 1.The Principal Secretary, Department of School Education, (Higher Secondary), Fort. St. George, Chennai. 2.The Director of School Education, E.V.K.Sampath Maligai, D.P.I.Campus, Chennai. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 4.The District Educational Officer, Thukkalay, Kanyakumari District. 5.The Secretary and Correspondent, Bapuji Memorial Higher Secondary School, Manavalakurichi, Kanyakumari District. + 1 cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR No.34715 + 1 cc to Mr.R.Subramanian, Advocate, SR No.34604 W.P.(MD)No.11410 of 2011 30.09.2011 vs RJ/31.10.11 2p/8c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/