IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-26204 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 01.11.2011 Krishan ....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana ....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr.Gorakh Nath, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Manmohan Sikka, DAG, Haryana. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.272 dated 12.08.2011, registered under Sections 15 and 27-A of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 120-B IPC and 25 of the Arms Act, at Police Station Sadar Fatehabad. On 30.08.2011, the following contention was noticed:- "Learned counsel states that the only allegation against the petitioner is the alleged disclosure statement of Dharam Pal (who was arrested with 27.5 Kilograms of Chura Post) to the effect that he and the petitioner alongwith one other person had made a plan to start the business of poppy husk. As per learned counsel, it is a case of false implication." Crl. Misc No. M-26204 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from ASI Virender Singh, informs the Court that in earlier FIR bearing No.308 of , the petitioner and his brother Dharam Pal, the co-accused have been convicted and sentenced to ten years imprisonment. Keeping in view the antecedents of the petition and the nature of allegations, in my considerered opinion, no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. Dismissed. ( AJAY TEWARI ) November 01, 2011. JUDGE mamta