1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.09.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD).No.11395 of 2011 A.Mohamed Abith Sulthan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Election Commissioner of Tamil Nadu, Chennai. 2.The Returning Officer cum Revenue Divisional Officer, 140, Trichy West Constituency, Trichy. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.A1/5572-2011, dated 27.09.2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to accept the nomination and allow the petitioner to participate the Bye- Election in 140 Trichy West Constituency. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Olimohammed For 1st Respondent : Mr.M.Govindan Special Government Pleader For 2nd Respondent : Mr.K.K.Senthil O R D E R The writ petition itself is misconceived. The impugned proceedings are passed by the Returning Officer and as against the same, the petitioner remedy is to file Election Petition. 2.In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner as above. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. sms Sd/- Assistant Registrar[AE] /True copy/ To Sub Assistant Registrar 1.THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF TAMIL NADU, CHENNAI. 2.THE RETURNING OFFICER CUM REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, 140, TRICHY WEST CONSTITUENCY, TRICHY. +1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, ADVOCATE SR.NO.34334. +1 CC TO M/S.K.K.SENTHIL, ADVOCATE SR.NO.34506. ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD).No.11395 of 2011 Dated:29/09/2011 1P/5C RPB : 10.10.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/