1 rpl-29-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY srj ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (L)NO.29 OF 2011 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.464 OF 2011 IN SUIT NO.382 OF 2011 Smt. Vijayalaxmi V. Narvekar & Others .. Petitioners/ Plaintiffs. V/s. Dattaguru V. Narvekar .. Respondent/ Defendant. Mr. Y.S. Bhate, for Petitioners/Plaintiffs. Mr. Sachin Chandan i/b. Swati Sawant, for Defendant/Respondent Nos. 1 & 4. Mr. P.G. Lad, for Defendant No.7. Defendant Nos.1 to 4 are present in person. CORAM : SMT. R.S.DALVI, J. DATE : 10th June, 2011. P.C.: Not on Board. Mentioned. Taken on Board. 1 Defendant Nos.1 to 4 are present in the Court. 2 Mr. Y.S. Bhate, Advocate for the Petitioners state that Petitioner No.1 is old and bed-ridden and is not present, but he identifies his thumb impression. 2 rpl-29-11.sxw 3 The parties have settled their disputes. Consequently, the Review Petition is disposed of. However, the dispute is settled permanently and the suit itself can be disposed of. The parties have signed and have filed Consent Minutes of Order. Defendant Nos.1 to 4 state that they have read the minutes of the order and agree with the same. There shall be order and decree in terms of the Consent Minutes of Order signed by the parties and their Advocates. The Consent Minutes of Order are taken on record and marked “X”. The undertakings, if any, in the Consent Minutes of Order are accepted. 4 Review Petition and Suit are disposed of accordingly. (R.S.DALVI, J.)