x// 6/?(2’22‘ BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION (cmo. UWé /2o1o / Abdul Gani Aadil S/o. Shri Mianjan Khan, aged about 61 years, R/o. Near Madrasa, Baijnath Para, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENT Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Through- it’s Commissioner, District Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA. PETITIONER V %% ? ky ta? ,3/ 07\ '5: _ ,,‘..,HIGH GOURT-OFACHHATHSGARH AT BILAsPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 441$ of 2010 Petitioner Abdu! Gani Aadil‘ Versus Respondent Municipal Corporation, Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) Present :- Shri Saurabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitiansr. Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent. ORDER O L (Passed on 11 day of August, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation submits that there is no contemplation for demorrtlon of any structure, which \t is duly Iegal and authorised, in respect of the petitioner, without affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 2. Shri Agrawai further submits that no demolition in respect of the property in dispute shall be done without affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 3. ln View of foregoing, nothing remairs in this. pqition for adjudication. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed with the’above- stated observation. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihmri Judge 4. No order asto costs. Ashok