WPCRL No.790 of 2010 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. T.C. Agarwal, Addl. GA for the State. Learned Addl. GA for the State has submitted that the petitioner nos.2 to 6 have surrendered before the court concerned and as such the writ petition pertaining to petitioner nos.2 to 6 has been rendered infructuous. A short counter affidavit has been filed by the Investigating Officer to this effect. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous as against the petitioner nos.2 to 6 only. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in the above circumstances he does not want to press the petition on behalf of petitioner no.1 and prayed that the same may be dismissed as not pressed. In view of the above statement, the writ petition of petitioner no.1 is also dismissed as not pressed. However, if the petitioner no.1 is arrested or surrenders before the court concerned, his bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (D.V.,J.) 28.9.2010 RG