IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.53134 of 2008 SAROJ MANI KUMARI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 18.04.2009 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The petitioner is alleged to have obtained appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika by producing a forged certificate. The counsel for the petitioner refers to Annexure-2, a certificate issued by the Bihar School Examination Board, Patna on 29.8.1990 to contend that in the result sheet she had been declared to have been passed and therefore, there was no representation on her part while seeking employment. Counsel for the petitioner when being asked to produce any corresponding certificate issued in the year 1990 would refer to mark sheet dated 20.9.2007 which definitely was not used by the petitioner for obtaining her appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika. In that view of the matter, when the record of the Board up to 2006 will go to show that her results were not declared, this Court would not find any reason to follow the order of 2 this Court in the case of Kanchan Kumari versus State of Bihar in Cr.Misc. No. 31308 of 2008 or in the case of Pinki Kumari @ Pinki Devi versus State of Bihar in Cr. Misc. No. 19304 of 2008 inasmuch as in the case of the petitioner her complicity in getting employment on the basis of forged document is writ large on the face of record. That being so, the prayer of the petitioner Sarojmani Kumari for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. In the event the petitioner would surrender before the Court below and file an application for grant of regular bail, the Court below will consider the same without being prejudiced by this order. Bibhash (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)