In the H0nble High Court 0t Chhatishgarh at Bilasgur (C. G4 ' etitioner //Shri Vyasnarayan singh aged 66 years son of Dukalusingh retired Gram Sahayak, Via Dhamdha Block and Tahsil Saja District, Durg (C.G.) Gram Panchayat Godmarra P.O.Gadadeeh Versus ReSpp0nd6nt ........ /1Th€ State Government of Chhattishgarh, Through tha Secretary, Panchayat & Social Welfare Department Ministry, D.K.S., Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) //2/ The Deputy Director of Panchayat, & ; grimgsmm Social Welfare Department, Durg. (Hi Mfr} A ' M“ 2¢§ 9 . 2'“J0( f‘w" s x/3/ The Joint Director, (Treasury,.Accounts & Pension), Raipur.(C.G.) rit Petition underArticles 226/227 0t the Constitutinn 01 India g3 P W HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 879 of 2005 Petitioner Shri Vyasnarayan Singh -Versus- Respondents The StatE Govamment of Chhattisgarh 8a others (Wm‘t Petition under Alticles 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agxihotri, J. Shri Somnath Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N. N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the respondents. o R D E R (Oran (Passed on this 6th day of January, 2010) Heard. With the consent of the parties he matter is heardj‘inally. t 2. This case pertains to non—grant of retiral dues/pension. Learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner, on instructions, submits that the matter may be referred to the pension committee. 3. This Court, in the matter of W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh 8a others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), and order dated 13.3.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31$ January, 2008, passed in W.P.NO. 4642/ 2004 (Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e., the ohice of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order as well as a copy of tho petition from the peu'tioner. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and officers concerned Within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of healing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the ofhcers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retjral dues, if any, to the petitioner, may be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. i .v‘ 5. The petitioner shall supply one complete set of the petition to the State counsel for transferring the same to the Committee. //w // Sd!‘ Agnihotri‘. Thalcur . Sa‘iSh K’ v: Judge