IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10423 of 2010 AJAY KUMAR . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 22-Apr-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has prayed for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 47 and other provisions of the Bihar Excise Act. It has been submitted that according to prosecution report seized articles were found from a place hired by co-accused, Raj Kumar who was arrested by the Excise officials but so far as the petitioner is concerned, the prosecution report simply mentions that he being in the category of other accused persons had fled away from the place of occurrence from before. It has further been submitted that the prosecution does not disclose who are the witnesses on the point that petitioner was present at the place of occurrence and was in conscious possession of the articles kept there and was seen fleeing away from that place. Considering the aforesaid submissions prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks, let the above named petitioner be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs.7,000/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Masaurhi, Patna, in connection with Case No.2 (2) 2009 registered under Section 47(f), 13(f) of the Patna Excise Act r/w sec 2 (e) and 3 of the Bihar Excise Rule, as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. perwez (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)