IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 21434 of 2010 Date of Decision: December 01, 2010 Kulwant Kaur ...... Petitioner Versus The Panchayat Samiti and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr. J.C.Batra, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. The petitioner entered in service in 1980. As per her case, in the year 2008 she came to know that the year of her birth was not 1952 but 1957 and at that stage she moved a representation but without deciding the same she was retired after taking her year of birth to be 1952. Now after her retirement this petition has been filed challenging that order. There is no explanation forth coming as to why only in the year 2008 that the petitioner came to know about her real date of birth nor is there any explanation forthcoming as to why and how the information which she obtained about her alleged date of birth in 2008 was not available to her for almost three decades of her service. Even in the writ petition no explanation has been given. It is now settled law that such applications on the verge of retirement cannot ordinarily be entertained. . Consequently this petition is dismissed. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE December 01, 2010 sunita