1 S.B.Cr.Revsion Petition No.364/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.364/2009 Richpal Vs. Smt.Vidhya Devi Date of Order : : 14/09/2009 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr.R.S.Gill, for the petitioner. Mr.Kailash Khatri, for the non-petitioner. BY THE COURT: The instant criminal revision petition under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 24.2.2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Anoopgarh, Headquarter Suratgarh (for short, “the Appellate Court” hereinafter) whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 3.9.2008 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Suratgarh (for short, “the trial Court” hereinafter), was dismissed. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Carefully gone through the orders passed by both the courts below as also record of the trial court. 2 S.B.Cr.Revsion Petition No.364/2009 The non-petitioner-Smt.Vidhya Devi who is legally wedded wife of the petitioner filed a petition under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short, “the Act of 2005” hereinafter) before the trial court. Along with the petition, an application seeking interim monthly allowance of maintenance has also been filed. The trial court by order dated 3.9.2008 granted interim monthly allowance of maintenance at the rate of Rs.1000/- per month in favour of the non-petitioner. From the perusal of the orders impugned, in my view, both the courts below were justified in passing the orders impugned. I do not find any error or illegality in the orders impugned warranting interference in revisional jurisdiction. The criminal revision petition is, therefore, dismissed. Record of the trial court be returned forthwith. (H.R.PANWAR), J. NK 3 S.B.Cr.Revsion Petition No.364/2009 S.B.CRIMINAL MISC.STAY PETITION NO.719/2009 IN S.B.CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.364/2009 Date of Order : : 14/09/2009 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.R.PANWAR Mr.R.S.Gill, for the petitioner. Mr.Kailash Khatri, for the respondent. Since the criminal revision petition itself has been dismissed, the stay petition also stands dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR), J. NK