*1* ss.850.09 kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.850 OF 2009 Ambalal R. Jain. ..Plaintiff -Versus- Subhash Ranu Gunjal and another. ..Defendants .......... Ramesh Jain, for the Plaintiff. .......... CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 29th October, 2010. P.C. 1 This is a summary suit on bill of exchange which was drawn for valuable consideration by the Defendant No.1 and accepted by the Defendant No.2. It was indorsed in favour of the Plaintiff who presented it but it was dishonoured on presentation. Thereafter, the demand notice was issued which has been duly received and in reply thereto, the Defendants admitted execution of the demand promissory note. The correspondence in that behalf is referred to and ultimately, the principal sum together with interest has been claimed. 2 I am satisfied that the Plaintiff’s claim is within the ambit of Order XXXVII of the Civil Procedure Code. No part of the Plaintiff’s claim is barred by limitation. Further both Defendants are working for gain at Mumbai, the promissory note was executed at Mumbai and the bill of exchange was presented and dishonoured at Mumbai. Therefore, this Court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit. 3 The affidavit proving the service is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The original documents are taken on record *2* ss.850.09 and marked “X-1” for identification. 4 In such circumstances, the suit is decreed as prayed. The Advocate’s costs be computed as per rules. Refund of the Court fees as per rules. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)