IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2011 / 27TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 32628 of 2008(H) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- VIJU.V.K, S/O. KUNJUKUNJU, VANACHIRAKKAL HOUSE, THENGODE.P.O, COCHIN-30, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.I.ABDUL RASHEED RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD BUILDINGS DIVISION, ALAPPUZHA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. MATHEW GEORGE VADAKKEL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 32628 OF 2008 ......................................................................... Dated this the 18th July , 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers: “i. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to disburse the amount covered by Ext.P3 bill submitted to the 3rd respondent with 15% interest forthwith. ii. Issue such other orders or directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and in the circumstances of the case. ” 2. The matter was admitted issuing urgent notice on 06.11.2008 and is now coming up for the first time thereafter. The learned Government Pleader submits with reference to the communication bearing No.16341/B2/08/Co-op dated 11.12.2008 issued by the Secretary to Government, addressing W.P.(C) No. 32628 OF 2008 2 the Advocate General, that the amount due to the writ petitioner has already been disbursed on 09.12.2008 and that the matter has become infructuous. A copy of the communication is also placed before this Court. There is no representation for the petitioner. In the above circumstance, this Court finds that nothing further remains to be considered by this Court and the writ petition is closed accordingly. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk