IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31894 of 2011 Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Sharma Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2 9.11.2011 Mr. Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner points out that this Court had earlier rejected the bail application of the petitioner vide order dated 23.2.2011 in Cr. Misc. No.4635 of 2011 noticing that the petitioner had caused the injury to the eye of the informant’s son for which he had to be treated as Sankar Netralaya at Chennai. Learned counsel for the petitioner further points out that, in fact, this had been a false plea taken inasmuch as Annexure C would show that the boy Massaurabh Kumar, Patient ID 2186704 was for quite some time before the incident itself under treatment at Sankar Netralaya .Annexure C series are the medical reports of Sankar Netralaya dated 12.1.2010 and 12.8.2010. A supplementary affidavit has been filed to show having came to know of this, on behalf of the petitioner, a complaint has been filed under Section 340 Cr.PC. for taking action against the informant. Mr. Singh further submits that actually it is a dispute of landlord and the tenant. The petitioner’s father being landlord wanted to evict, which is being resisted by the prosecution party. The petitioner is in custody since 20.5.2011. Be that as it may let the above named petitioner be 2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate,1st Class, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Rupaspur P.S.Case no. 85/2010. Singh ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)