IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21905 of 2011 Haribans Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2 22.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in Arrah Muffasil P.S.Case No. 272/2010 Under Section 302/34 of IPC read with Section 27 of Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation in the file only to the extent that the petitioner standing at some distance with two other accused persons and asked about where is the deceased, who is the son of the informant. He submitted that the petitioner has not committed offence and offences as alleged in FIR and he has falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics. He also submits that being a graduate he could not be committed such crime. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 24.12.2010 .He further submits that there is no single criminal antecedent and has been stated in paragraph-12 of the petition. Learned counsel also submits that another o-accused Anil Mahto has also been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench in Cr. Misc. No.10151 of 2011 on 07.7.2011. Thereafter ,the facts and circumstances of the case ,let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of 2 Rs.10, 000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. Bhojpur at Arrah in connection with Arrah Muffasil P.S.Case no. 272 of 2010. Sudha ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)