IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8253 of 2006 Shivam Planners & Construction Pvt. Ltd., a registered Private Company under the Company Act through its Director Manoj Kumar Singh S/o Late Rabindra Singh, resident of Anand Vihar, Bailey Road, Patna, P.S. Danapur District and in the town of Patna. ……petitioner. Versus 1. The Power Grid Corporation Of India, a Public Enterprises of Union of India through Chairman-cum-Managing Director, B/9 Kutub Industrial Area Katwaeaya Saraya, New Delhi-1100 16. 2. The Managing Director, Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd. a Public Enterprises of Govt. of India B/9 Kutub Industrial Area Katwaeaya Saraya, New Delhi-1100 16. 3. The Deputy General Manager (C & M) EPST Power Grid Corporation of India, Alankar Palace, Boring Road, Patna. 4. The Assistant General Manager (ST), Muzaffarpur Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., East of Chandmari (Firing Range) & South of Chakkar Maidan, Muzaffarpur, Bihar. 5. The Chief Manager (ST), Gopalganj, Bihar Sub-Transmission Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. 6. The Chief Manager (Finance) Power Grid Corpn. of India Ltd., Alankar Palace, Boring Road, Patna. 7. The Manager (ST) Motihari, Bihar, Sub-Transmission Power Grid Corpn. Of India Ltd. …..Respondents. ------------------- 03/ 21.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for directing the respondents to execute the agreement in connection with the work, namely Construction of quarters and amenities at 132/33 KV Sub-Station at Gopalganj Bridge in compliance of clause 17.0 of the letters of contract Awards and fix a fresh date of completion of work as also not to deduct any damage from one running bill as the entire bill amount of a running account bill is the working capital of a contractor like petitioner and also for commanding the respondents to - 2 - refund the deducted amount on account of bill amounting to Rs.8 lacs and odd relating to the work under package L aforesaid. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he had filed a detailed application dated 29.06.2006 (Annexure-2) before the General Manager and Dy. General Manager ( C & M) ERST both of Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. for redressal of his grievances, but without passing any order against the petitioner coercive action is sought to be taken by the respondents. 4. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to approach the General Manager (C & M) ERST of Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Patna along with a copy of the said application dated 29.06.2006. If such an application is filed by the petitioner within fifteen days from today along with a copy of this order, the said authority shall consider the same in accordance with law and shall decide it by a speaking order within two months thereafter and if any amount is found admitted and payable it should be paid to the petitioner immediately thereafter. However, if any amount is not found admitted and payable in the said order, the petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the same before an appropriate forum. 5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sunil ( S. N. Hussain, J.)