IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5262 of 2010 BAIDYANATH MISHRA SON OF SRI BHUTTU BISHRA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MEHA, P.O. PARIHAR, P.S. BALIA DISTRICT BEGUSARAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COLLECTOR- CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BEGUSARAI. 2. THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, BEGUSARAI. 3. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, DISTRICT ESTABLIHMENT, BEGUSARAI. 4. THE SUBDIVISIONAL OFFICER-CUM- SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, BALIA SUB DIVISION, DISTRICT - BEGUSARAI ----------- 02. 29.03.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon superannuation on 31 of January 2008 while working on the post of Clerk in the officer of Sub-Divisional Office, Balia, District – Begusarai, post retiral dues of the petitioner as indicated in paragraph -1 of the writ application have not been settled as yet. It is further submitted that proceeding under Rule 43 (b) was initiated against the petitioner in which Conducting Officer exonerated the petitioner. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file representation before the Collector, Begusarai. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)