IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6642 of 2010 Mr.Ghanshyam Lal Jamuar, son of Late Ram Lakhan Lal Jamuar, resident of Mohalla Harnaha Tola, Sudarshanpath, Kahje Kala, Patna City, Police Satition- Khaje, District Patna. … Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar Old Secretariat, Patna (Bihar). 2. The President Pension Committee, Patna, Bihar. 3. The Joint Secretary, Home Department, Patna, Bihar. 4. The Deputy Secretary, Home Special, Deptt. Of Home, Govt. of Bihar Old Secretariat, Patna (Bihar). 5. The Collector, the District of Muzaffarpur. … Respondents. -------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kameshwar Prasad Sinha, Adv. For the State : Mr. P. K. Shahi, A. G. ----------- 2. 19.04.2010 In this Public Interest Litigation, twofold grievances, namely, the petitioner and his likes who are entitled to J. P. Senani Samman Pension as they meet the criteria, have not been granted the same benefit and second, certain persons have been given the benefit without satisfying the criteria. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that more than fifty one thousand applications are pending for grant of such pension. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. K. Shahi, learned Advocate General for the State, we are of the considered opinion that the said 2 ‘Samman’ was introduced in the year 2009. Be it noted, there has to be an individual appreciation of case. If any particular individual is entitled to get the said pension, it is open to him to file an individual writ petition so that the controversy can be appreciated from all spectrums. There cannot be an omnibus direction to the functionaries of the State to dispose of all the representations filed by all the aspirants to get J. P. Senani Samman Pension. We are disposed to think that the prayer is mercurial in nature and if we accede to the prayer, it will be in the spacious realm which a writ court is not expected to do. In view of the aforesaid, while declining to interfere, we observe that individual claimant is entitled to file appropriate writ petition with requisite data for claiming the benefit under the scheme. With the aforesaid observation, the writ application is disposed of. Kanchan (Dipak Misra, CJ.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)