;T@ 2N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BXLASpUR ,(C_.G_, ) Wr it Petition No.5^<s2-/2Q04. P ET.IT IONER ^4^ ^w./ '^y Q^W^ ...-^ty' a\) ^ ^ RE3PONDENTS Satyendra Pradhan (Minor), aged about 14 years S/o lafce Minketan Throagh • . .. Guardin 11/iother Smt. Baxdai Pradhan M/o late Minketan pradhan^ resident of Ganj Thana Raipur, Tah<& .Distt,» Raipur (C^G*), ve r su s : 1< Union of India Through ; The Secretary^ 1 Eepartment of Personnel Public orievance & Pension, Third Floor, Lok 1 Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi. ; 2<, State of Chhattlisgarh Throagh : The Secretary, State Police D.K.S*Building,| Mantralaya, Raipur(C:«G«); 3^ State of Madhya pradesh l Through : YIie Secretary, Depptt^ of | State Police, 'Vatlabh Bhawan | Mantralaya,. Bhopal (M.P,) 4, Secretary General Administration 2^partment, (^vernment of Chhattisgarh, Raipar. (CG) 5, Inspector General of Pol ice ^ RaJpur (<£»G<)^ <«••eontd^»», \ ^ 2 - 6, Saper intendent of Police, Raipur {€:*G, 7 • Town . Inspector, Qanj Thana, Raipur (€;^G.), WRIT P2TITION UNDER ^RTICLE 22.6/227"OP..THECONSTITU'TION OP INDIA. i HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAmSGARH ; BIIASPUR 8INGLEBBNCH : HON»BLESHM SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION N0. 3SQ2 of 2004 Petitioner Respondents Versus Salyendra Pradhaii Union oflndia aad others Present : Shri S.K. Thonias, counsel for fhe petitioner. Shri S,K. Beriwal, Staadiag counsel for tiie respondent No. 1/UxiionofIiidia. Srat Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govenniient Advocate for the respondents No. 2, 4, 5, 6 axid 7. None for the respondent No. 3. ORAL ORDER (20"* April, 2006) 1. Learaed counsel for the petitioner submits tliat fhe petitioner is fhe son of Shri Miaketaii, who was workmg as Aarakshak m fhe ofiice of fhe Supermtendent of Police, Raipur. Shri Miaketaa was died ia haniess on 29.5.2000, 2, The petitioner, beiag dependant-legal heir offhe deceased filed aa application on 9,6,2000 for comipassionate appoiatmieHt before the Inspcctor General of PoUce, Raipur. The said appUcation was not considered on fhe ground fhat fhe deafh has occurred beforc creation of new State of Chhatdsgarh, 3. The State of Chhattisgarh, by its circular dated 2.2.2006, has directed all fhe departments to consider cases of all fhe eligible dependaat-legal heir of the employees, who died ia haraess between 1.11.1997 to 31.10.2000 for compassionate appomtaoLent, -—— 4, Accordiagly, the State Govenunent is directed to consider fhe case of the petitioner as per its own circular dated 2.2,2006 aad also in view of the order dated 20,12,2005 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 1322/2002 aad oftier connected matters on its own merit, m accordance with law, on such reprcsentation beiag filed by the petitioner. 5. For fhe reasons stated-above, fhe writ petition stands disposed of, No order as to costs. Certified copy as per Rules. Bablu Sd/- Satish K. Agniliotri Judge