IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-2606 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 27,2011 Veena Rani and another ....................................................... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ................................................. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. A.S.Manaise, Advocate for the petitioners. ... RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of a direction to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to ensure the safety of life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent Nos. 4 to 8, as they performed marriage against the wishes of the aforesaid respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have submitted a representation dated 24.1.2011 (Annexure P-5) to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Batala, but nothing has been done. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur-respondent No.2 is directed to look into the representation (Annexure P-5) made by the petitioners and if required, necessary protection be provided to the petitioners. Petition stands disposed of. 27.1.2011 ( RITU BAHRI ) Rupi JUDGE