L (3. •^ ( IN THEaiG G©IJIfEOE^HH@ATrTISGARHATBILASPlJR ..'W.P.NO. .N'4;?l'/2003^'' .:• . SHRIMAD VALL^BHACHARYA BHARAT - VIDYA VISHWAVIDYALAY,c A UNIVERSITY ESTABLISHED AND 3SOTIFIED UNEffiR THE [ELEVAIMT ERCWESIONS QF THE CHHATTISGARH ]§IZf yKjSIlfiTRA VISHWA VIDYALAYA (STAPHANAt .€:; jAVAM VININIYAM) 2002,SRQls[SORED BY SHRIMAD YALLABHAlS'HARYA DHARM AVAM! S^NSKRITI SHODH ANVESMa^^ :S^NS']?HAM- : ^NYAS :CHA]^AM8ii»S%iI^% ^^ THROL l %W JR.EXMSI'R^R, DR. DEEPAK SHi^RMA, SON QF LATE R.G. SHARMA, A.GBD ABQUT 49 YEARS, RESIDENT OF IDEEPAK HOUSE, JALSREH MAR<5, RAIPUR / ^^^^: AM.^^5f^"""" ADHINJYAM, ^t^'",..^^-" &i»"^r PETIT'IONER vs STATE^ QF CHHA'I'TISGARH, THROlXjiH THE SEC'RBT^RY;, DEPARI'MENT OF ; HICjHER EDUCATION, D.K.S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR. i> 2. THE REGUJLATQRY :*<^^?^COMMI8SION, CON5TITUTED lt' •'! rgll XI-HC-78 \dCT|T<t|<lt|p)<t,t»Ti?|wiS,|6il?)|<My TWc5ia»W^ ^200 3II^5TtiilR'<i<b a'airair^sTi •\- Subbu 3n^9I qW (T3?rfsP^) S^niR^ftHaiAST DIVISIONBENCH; HON'Bl.E SHRI A.K. PATNAIK, Cj &HON'SLESHRI SUNll, KUAMR 26.06.200S: Heard Mr. B.P. Sharma, 1| Koshy, leamed Dy. Advocate Gens| Harit.Sr. Advocatewith Mr. A. Swal In this writ petttion the petiti^ner has chaliengsd th®constitutiona! validity and vires of Chhattisgarh Niji Viniyaman') Adhiniyam, 2004 by wh Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana Aur Vii Petition (Civii) No.19 of 2004 (] Chhattisgarh & Others), the Sup| Sections 5 & 6 of the Chhattisgart-] writ petition does notsurwveand ai] A <»l<jtCT<(ll^11*1C>T'tfav3 xRll-^K ^3I^I»i3ff^ir SINHA. J. iarned counsel for tbe petitioner, P.S. ^l forthe Stat®of Chhattisgarh and Mr. Vinay Tikar, teamed eounsel for respondent No.3. Kshetra Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana Aur ch the provisions of Chhattisgarh Niji Kshetra liyaman) Adhiniyam, 2002 are sought to be amended. ; Bya judgmentof the Supre|ne Court dated 11.02,2005 delivered inWrit 3rofessor Yashpal & Others vs. State of 'eme Court has dectared the provisions of Niji Kshetra Vishwavidyalaya (Sthapana Aur Viniyaman) Adhihiyam, 2002 as ulti|a v1res the Constitution and has also quashed the notifications issued bythe Stat^ Govemment in the Gazette in the purported exercise of the power under S^ion 5 of the aforesaid Aot notiiying the univeraities and also held that the Universities shall cease toexist. : In viewoftHe saidjudgment|pfthe Supreme Courtdated 11 .02.2005, this coFdinglythes^me Isdismissed. Sd/- Chief Justice Judge Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge