M’ ‘1 n 2/— @ L 3W$LE BEwgH IN THE HON BLE HIGH COURT OFiCHHATl-ISGARH AT BILASPUR (C G WRIT PETITION (S) NO. é%&‘ OF 2010 1. X Rajesh Kushwaha Son of Shri Harinaray‘an KushWaha, aged about 32: years, Resident of Surajpur,iTahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.). Praveen Kumar Lakda Son of Shri C. K‘. Lakda, aged about 32 years Manish Mahto Son of Late Shri Roshan Lal, aged about 29 years Randip Das Son of Late Shri Mank Das, aged about 23 years Arvincl Yadav Son of Shri Chhatru Das, aged, about 27 years ‘ Parmesh‘War Das Son of Shri l Ramchand, aged about 43 years Moha-n Lal Son of Shri Kantu Lal, aged about 42 years Naresh Mogre Son of Shri Ratan Lal, aged'about 35 years Parvez Akhtar Khan Son of Shrj Hamid Khan,‘ aged about 34 years Dinesh Sharma Son of Late Shri Sadhuram, aged about 34 years Ramkumar Nayak Son of Shri Naval Sai, aged about 32 years 12. f‘Babunath Toppo Son of Late Shri Santawan Toppo, aged about 36 PETITIONERS years K W 13 Wamvriksha Son of Late Shri'? Bahal Ram, aged about 38 years // x /, 14. 15. / ~ Soni; aged Mangal Singh Son of Shri Sulkhan Singh, agetij about 26 years 16. / @ Ramesh Kumar Son of Late Shri Dhanush Dhari, aged about 34 years Arvind Soni Son of Shri Basant about 30 years Surguja-(C.G.) WRIT PIETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 17. Ram Prasad Son of Late Shri Sukhdev, aged about 28 years Petitioner No.2 to 17 are residents of' Bishrampur, Tahsii Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Urban Administration and Deveiopment Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, RaipUr, District Raipur (C.G.). 2. Under Secretary, Urban Administration ‘and Development Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, / Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Chief Municipai Officer, Nagar Panchayat Bishrampur, Distt. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0. 6701 of 2010 PETITIONERS : Rajesh Kushwahal & Others I I VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisg rh & Others I WRIT PE IITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE C NSTITUTION OF INDIA I 1 SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Aqnihotri, J. ‘ I Present: I Shri V.K. Pandey, Advocate forthe petitioners. I Shri Sushil Dubey, GovernmentAdvocate for the State. I Shri Srijit C.S. Nair, Advocate forthe reépondent No.3. I ORDER ORAL t . (Passed on 215 day of April, 201 1) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties fairly submit that the issue with regard to applicability of circulars dated 23/09/2010 and 05/03/2008 was considered in_ Virendra Das g Mani/(puri & Others v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Othersl. This cpui‘I, after hearing all the parties, considered the issue and passed f l l thep'rder 't in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Others’. This petition may be dispolsed of accordingly. 2. Thus; having regarding to the facts situation of the case, wherein the l issuei involved in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Othersl as well as in this case Iare one and the same, the instant petition stands disposed of in the same terms and order passed in Virendra Das Manikpuri & Otheris’. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotti . Judge l i 1‘W.P.(S) NO. 74150 Of 2010, decided on 10.02.2011 1i I I I} I y i l tl x t l y i i l v \\ t t