1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.44 OF 2010 In CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.30 OF 2010 Shri Chandrashekhar Adivoppa Chavan : Applicant (Orig.Accused No.3) V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. : Respondents .... WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1422 OF 2009 In CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1196 OF 2009 Ramasubramanyam Sitaraman : Applicant (Orig.Accused no.1) V/s. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. : Respondents .... Mr.S.P.Kadam for the applicant in Criminal Application No.44/2010. Mr.R.A.Shaikh for the applicant in Criminal Application No.1422/2009. Mr.A.S.Shitole, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Mr.D.A.Nalawade, P.P. for Union of India. .... CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : MARCH 05, 2010. P.C.: Criminal Application No.1422 of 2009 is not on board. 2 However, since the matter arising out of identical issues is at sr. no.64, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks production of the said matter and requests for hearing along with Criminal Application No.44 of 2010. Production granted and heard along with Criminal Application No.44 of 2010. 2. Taking into consideration that the applicant in Criminal Application No.44 of 2010 is sentenced to R.I. for a period of six months and the applicant in Criminal Application No.1422 of 2009 is sentenced to R.I. for one year for the offence punishable under section 409 of the I.P.C. and he was further convicted under section 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to R.I. for one year, I am inclined to allow these applications, considering the short period of sentence. The applicants in Criminal Application Nos.44 of 2010 and 1422 of 2009 are directed to be continued on bail on the same terms and conditions as were applicable during trial, however on fresh bonds. B. R. GAVAI, J.