IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13624 of 2010 SUMITRA DEVI WIFE OF LATE JISKU SHARMA, RESIDENT VILLAGE- BHADWA, P.S. RAHUI, DISTRICT- NALANDA, AT PRESENT RESIDENT OF MOHALLA KAGJI MOHALLA, NEAR TO THE R.P.S. SCHOOL, P.S. BIHAR SHARIF, DISTRICT- NALANDA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE HEALTH SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE CIVIL SURGEON-CUM-CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, AT BIHAR SHARIF, DISTRICT- NALANDA 3. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, BADI PAHARI BRANCH, BIHAR SHARIF, NALANDA ----------- 2 25.08.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, the State, the Accountant General and the respondent-Bank. It is submitted that upon her superannuation in the year 1996 from the post of Grade A Nurse while working under the control of respondent no.2 the petitioner is receiving her pension vide P.P.O. No. 262205 issued by the Accountant General on 28th January, 1997. It is further submitted that in the pension payment order the designation of the petitioner is mentioned as A.N.M. instead of Grade A Nurse. The primary grievance of the petitioner is that after the revision of the pension she is not getting the correct amount of pension which according to the petitioner would be evident from the calculation chart enclosed with the writ petition as contained in Annexure-4 (series). Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Accountant General submits that the calculation of the petitioner shall be considered as per law. - 2 - In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no.3. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the grievances of the petitioner raised in the representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner may be settled without delay. However, upon consideration if the claim of the petitioner is found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)