IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MA No.686 of 2008 1. SHEO KUMARI DEVI, wife of Gajendra Mahato and 2. Gajendra Mahato, son of Jailal Mahato, both are residents of Village – Manikpur, P.O. Vaishali, P.S. Saraiya, Dist. – Muzaffarpur ………………………….. Claimants/Appellants Versus 1. PARMANAND SINGH, son of late Jagdish Singh, R/o New Pathergali, Ram Gobind Singh Lane, P.O. and P.S. – Shastri Nagar, Dist. – Patna …… O.P. No. 2 / Respondent 1st Set, 2. D.M., the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Motijheel, Muzaffarpur …. Opp. Party No. 3 / Respondent No. 2nd Set …. Respondents. ----------- 4. 19.02.2010. Though this matter was listed for orders, on consent of learned counsel for the parties, it is finally heard. Heard Mr. Yugal Kishore, learned counsel for the appellant along with Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate and Mr. Sanjay Singh, learned counsel for the Insurer. In this appeal challenge is to the judgment and award dated 06.09.2008 and 16.09.2008 passed by the learned 5th Additional Motor Vehicle Claim Tribunal, Muzaffarpur in Motor Vehicle Accidents Claim Case No.153/99, whereby he has awarded a sum of Rs.50,000/- to be paid by the insurer to the claimant by way of compensation for the death of a minor child. In course of hearing, learned counsel for 2 the parties fairly stated that they have no objection if the awarded sum is enhanced to Rs.1,50,000/- with stipulation that the differential sum shall be deposited before the Tribunal within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order passed today and the said amount be disbursed keeping in view the decision rendered in General Manager, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Trivandrum v. Mrs. Susamma Thomas and others, A.I.R. 1994 SC 1631. Regard being had to such concession, the appeal stands disposed of and the award is modified accordingly, without any order as to costs. Dilip ( Dipak Misra, C.J. )