WPMS No. 2639 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. M.S. Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for respondent No.3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for the caveator and the learned Brief Holder for the State, this Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case where the Court should interfere in these interlocutory proceedings. It transpires that the petitioners filed a suit under Section 229-B of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 for declaration of his rights. An injunction application in terms of Section 229- D was also filed which remained pending. The defendant appeared and contested the matter. During the pendency, the plaintiff filed an amendment application which was allowed against which the defendant filed a revision. In this revision, the plaintiff filed an application for injunction which was allowed and an injunction was granted directing the parties to maintain status quo and further restrained the defendant from alienating the property. Against the grant of injunction, the defendant filed a revision before the Chief Revenue Commissioner u/S 333 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act. The Chief Revenue Commissioner by the impugned order has set aside the injunction order and remitted the matter to the Commissioner to re-decide the injunction application afresh. The petitioners being aggrieved by the said order, has filed the present writ petition. The Court finds that the matter is being side tracked on miscellaneous issues and without going into the controversy as to whether the revision is maintainable under Section 333 of the U.P. Z.A.& L.R. Act at the hands of the defendants, this petition is disposed of directing the Commissioner to consider and decide the injunction application of the petitioner within one week from the date of the production of a certified copy of the order and further decide the revision of the defendant on merit within four weeks from the date of the production of a certified copy of the order. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 15.12.2011 Shiv