IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2131 of 2009 KUMARI SHUSHMA @ KUMARI SUSHMA, Wife of Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh, resident of village – Vikrampur, P.O. Vikrampur, Police Station – Cheriya Bariarpur, District – Begusarai. ………….. Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. Shri Anjani Kumar Singh, the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Shri Ashutosh, the Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 4. Shri Raj Mukul, the Divisional Commissioner, Munger Division, Munger. 5. Shri Jitendra Shrivastava, the District Magistrate, Begusarai. 6. Shri Ramesh Chandra Mishra, the Deputy Development Commissioner – cum- Chairman, District Education Establishment Committee, Begusarai. 7. Ram Raj Rajak, the District Superintendent of Education, Begusarai. 8. Shri Siya Ram Singh, the Block Development Officer, Cheriya Bariarpur, District – Begusarai. 9. Shri Kesari Sudhir Singh, the Block Education Extension Officer, Cheriya Bariarpur, District – Begusarai. 10. Daizy Kumari, the Prakhand Pramukh Cheriya Bariarpur Prakhand, District – Begusarai. 11. Shri Kamlesh Kumar Son of Ramanand Singh, resident of village – Vikrampur, P.S. Cheriya Bariarpur, District Begusarai, the then Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Raj Vikrampur, Anchal – Cheriya Bariarpur, District – Begusarai. 12. Shri Mahadeo Paswan, the present Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Raj Vikrampur, Anchal – Cheriya Bariarpur, District – Begusarai. 13. Shri Satya Narayan Mahto, the Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Vikrampur, Anchal – Cheriya Bariarpur, District – Begusarai. 14. Smt. Raj Kumari Devi the Incharge Headmistress of Govt. Middle School Vikrampur, Anchal – Cheriya Bariarpur, District – Begusarai. ………Respondents/Opp. Parties. 15. Prema Kumari wife of Rajeev Kumar, resident of village – Batkurwa, P.O. Vikarampur, P.S. Cheriya Bariarpur, District – Begusarai, at present posted as Panchayat Teacher in Govt. Middle School Vikrampur, Anchal – Cheriya Bariarpur, District – Begusarai. …….. Private Respondent/Opp. Party. ----------- 04/ 13.04.2010 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the State. Show cause has been filed on behalf of O.P. Nos. 5, 6 and 8 showing that in compliance of the direction of this - 2 - Court the representation of the petitioner was considered in view of the order dated 9.1.2009. An order passed in compliance of the direction of this Court has been annexed as Annexure – B to the show cause. This order indicates that representation of the petitioner was rejected, as letter dated 1.12.2008 was subsequently declared inoperative by the orders of the High Court in another writ application. Direction in the writ application was to consider representation of the petitioner in the light of Annexure-27, i.e. letter dated 1.12.2008. Since it was declared inoperative, petitioner had no case. Show cause indicates, proper compliance of the order passed in writ application. This proceeding is dropped. Petitioner has liberty to move before any appropriate forum. DKS/ (Mridula Mishra, J.)