THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.13006 of 2009 Dated: 02.11.2009 Between: Secunderabad Cantonment Board. .. Petitioner. And Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Chief Secretary, A.P.Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others. .. Respondents. ORDER: This writ petition is filed questioning the proceedings dated 09.04.2009 of the 3rd respondent-District Collector, Hyderabad, and the proceedings dated 22.05.2009 of the 4th respondent-Tahsildar, Tirumalgiri Mandal, ordering mutation of revenue records, in respect of land admeasuring Ac.10.00 in Sy.No.170 (part) of Thokatta village, Tirumalgiri Mandal, Secunderabad, belonging to the Government of India, in the name of the respondents 11 to 27 herein. There is no necessity of going into all the details. A detailed counter affidavit has been filed by respondents 11 to 27 controverting the averments contained in the affidavit filed in support of the case of the petitioner. In the reply affidavit filed to the counter affidavit filed by respondents 11 to 27, the petitioner stated as under:- “…..the petitioner is restricting its submissions to the extent of the Dhobi Ghat and Absorption Ground (Now converted into park) only covering a total extent of Ac.10.00 out of the total extent Ac.11.11 which is directed to be mutated in the name of the respondents 11 to 27 by the respondent No.4. It is worth mentioning at this stage that the respondents 11 to 27 in no part of the affidavit submitted that they are not claiming the Dhobi Ghat and Absorption Ground (now converted into park) covering an area of Ac.11.11 gts. for which the above writ petition is filed. On the contrary, the respondents 11 to 27 are claiming Ac.10.00 in the cantonment play ground only covered by survey No.170 part and GLR survey No.661 and 662.” Pursuant to filing of the reply affidavit by the petitioner, the respondents 11 to 27 filed additional counter affidavit, wherein it is stated that the impugned orders are not in respect of the land identified by the petitioner as Dhobi Ghat and Absorption Ground (now converted into park) and that they are not claiming the said land nor the impugned orders of mutation are in respect of the said land. In view of the stand taken by respondents 11 to 27 in their additional counter affidavit, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner agreed for closure of the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed recording the stand taken by respondents 11 to 27 in their additional counter affidavit. No order as to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 02.11.2009 v v