> 2% m m..........................‘. ........................W 200 'mm (W) mm.m mmm , mmm Wafgygm . . ‘ Sinql‘e Bench: Hcn’ble Shri Dhirendra Mishfa, J W.P.1c! NC. 2842 OF 2009 / 22.6.2009: - _ Shri Sushobhit Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, learned PL for he State/respondents. The petitioner by the insta t petition is seeking direction against respondent No.1 to revoke the ord of suspension of the petitioner from the post of Sarpanch on the ground that the same was not confirmed by respondent No.3 within a period op 90 days from the date of receipt of'the order. Learned counsel for the petit oner submits that as per Section 39(2) of the Panchayat Raj Avam Gram waraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (in short “the Adhiniyam, 1993”) if the order of su pension under sub-section (1) of Section 39 of the Adhiniyam, 1993 is not c firmed by the State Govt. within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of such report, suspension is deemed/to ’// WWWW FS/9s——1x/2oos—-1,oo,ooo. PETITIONER : Kisholi Bai, W/o Shri Ballabh, aged about 55 years, R/o Lohakhan, Tehsil & District-Raigarh (CG) 7 ‘Versus RESPONDENTS 1. Sub E ivisional Officer (Revenue), Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG) 2. Chief Executive Officer. Janpad Panchayat, ‘Pussc re, District Raigarh (CG) 3. State of Chhattisgarh, Thro h Secretary, Department of Panchayat, DKS hawan. Raipur (CG) WW m 209 amW (W) W$W WWW :2. WW§WW mmm acmm have Vacated. The petitioner has alveady submitted a represéntation of r Annexure .P/5 before the Sub Divisiionat Officer, Raigarh and prayed for permitting her to discharge the duties of Sarpanch as the order of suspension stands revoked as per deeming provi sions of Section 39(2) of the Adhiniyam, 1993, however, the same has not been considered and decided even after a period of 10 monthsrHe further submits that this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the SDO. garhlrespondent No.1 to decide the representation of Annexure P/5 of th petitioner within a stipuiated period in accordance with law. Shri Ajit Singh, learned PL ap aring for the State/respondents submits that in case-the petitioner fries a fr sh representation for redressai of her grievances raised in this petition with n a period of 1O days from today before respondent No.1, the same shaii be considered and decided by respondent No.1 within a further period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation in accordance with la ln view of above submission of learned counsel for the respective parties, the instant petition is dispo of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation for redressal her grievances raTSed in this petition, before respondent No.1 within a per od of 10 days from today, who, in turn, shall consider and decide the same \ thin a further period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation i accordance with laJAL/ Sdl— Dhirendm Mishra v Judge Kt i WW Wm—Fs/w—l r /200$—1,oo,000. R i s f i