WP(C) 4152/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. A.K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Handique , learned State counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. The writ petition is taken up for disposal at the motion stage without i ssuing any notice to the respondent Nos.5 to 13 since the writ petition is propo sed to be disposed of allowing the petitioners to approach the Executing Court i n Title Execution Case No.3/2008, which is presently pending. The grievance of the petitioners in the present petition is that though the decree was passed in Title Suit No.9/2003 in respect of the land covered by Dag No.235 of Touji Patta No.27, the Latmandal has wrongly identified the land c overed by Dag No.290 of periodic patta No.183 standing in the name of the petiti oners and on the basis of which there is likelihood of the decree being executed in respect of the petitioners’ land in respect of which no decree in fact has b een passed. It appears that for execution of the decree passed in the aforesaid suit , the decree holders, the private respondents in the present writ proceeding, in stituted the Title Execution Case No.3/2008, which is still pending for disposal . The issue raised by the petitioners can be resolved only by the Executing Cour t in the execution proceeding and as such the present petition is disposed of gi ving liberty to the petitioners to approach the Executing Court ventilating thei r grievances and if such approach is made, the same shall definitely be consider ed and necessary order in accordance with law would be passed by the Executing C ourt upon hearing the decree holders. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.