IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.9530 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 26, 2011. Surinder Pal .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Ravi Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the respondents to grant him the consequential benefits after the order of termination of his services dated 15.3.1988 has been set-aside by the High Court vide judgment dated 12.8.2009. The above stated claim has been raised by the petitioner vide a legal notice dated 4.4.2011 (Annexure P-4) also, but without any response thereto. In these circumstances, however, without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioner's claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider CWP No.9530 of 2011 [2] and dispose of the afore-mentioned claim of the petitioner as also contained in the legal notice dated 4.4.2011, by passing a speaking order, within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. May 26, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE