1appln-1698-10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION No. 1698/2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr Manoj J. Bhatt, for the Applicant. Mr P.S. Hingorani, A.P.P.for the State. CORAM:- A.R. JOSHI, J. DATE :- 18TH JUNE, 2010. P.C.:- Heard learned advocate for the applicant Shri Manoj J. Bhatt. After hearing for about 20 minutes on the merits of the matter, it is made known to this Court that earlier criminal application for bail bearing No.602/2010 was preferred by the same applicant before another Bench (Shri D.G.Karnik,J) and by an order dated 22.2.2010 it was allowed to be withdrawn. Said permission was granted by the said Bench with liberty to apply afresh, in the event the Sessions trial does not commence within six months. Admittedly, six months period is not over and as such present application is in fact premature. In other words, the prayer on behalf of the applicant while withdrawing earlier bail application must bind the applicant.This factual position should have been made known to this Court at the first instance by the learned Advocate for the applicant. However, unfortunately 2appln-1698-10 without mentioning the same and suppressing it, matter was argued. However, in the interest of judicial discipline and propriety when it is asked to the learned Advocate for the applicant as to which mode he wants to seek, whether to withdraw application being premature or want the order of rejection, he prays for withdrawal of the present application with liberty to comply the conditions as mentioned in the earlier order dated 22.2.2010. Under these circumstances, present application is allowed to be withdrawn and accordingly disposed of. (A.R.JOSHI,J)