1 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5373 OF 2007 Mr. Smt Sunita Sadashivrao Patil .. Petitioner -versus Ruikar Vishwasta Mandal, Kolhapur Through Trustees .. Respondents Mr. Amit B Borkar, for the petitioner. Mr V. B. Naik, a/w R.S. Alange for respodent Nos 1,2, 3 & 6. CORAM: A.S. OKA, J. DATED:25 th September, 2009. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 7th August, 2006, passed by District Court as well as to the order dated 30th July,2005 passed by the Trial Court. 2. The petitioner is impleaded as defendant No.1(a) and her son has been impleaded as defendant No.1(b) in their capacity as legal representatives of first defendant. The first defendant had already filed written statement. The petitioner and her son engaged a common advocate and filed a pursis adopting said written statement. Subsequently by application at exh.205, a prayer was 2 made by the petitioner for grant of permission to file a separate written statement. The trial Court rejected the said application. The District Court by the impugned order has confirmed the order and has permitted the legal representatives of original first defendant to sign and verify the pursis. 3. After having heard the submissions of the learned counsel, I find that the pursis was filed by the advocate for the petitioner adopting written statement of the husband of petitioner. After adopting the written statement of her husband, now the petitioner cannot file a fresh written statement. Therefore, there was every justification for the Courts below to reject the application. There is no need to to interfere with the impugned orders. Hearing of the suit is expedited. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the sum of Rs.5,000/- deposited in this Court. 4. The petition is disposed of. (A.S. OKA, J)