1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application No. 4030 of 2007 In First Appeal (St) No. 9033 of 2007 Mukund v. Sonali and ors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Mr M.N. Ingle, Adv for applicant Mr A.M. Quazi, Adv for R-2 & 3 Coram : A.P. Bhangale, J. Dated : 10 th December 2009 Heard learned counsel for the appellant. None appears for respondent no.1, though served. Learned counsel for applicant submits that applicant came to know about the proceedings only when he received notice in execution. According to him, claim put up by respondent no.1 is fabricated and appellant. Looking to the nature of dispute and for the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs. 500/- to be paid to the High Court Legal Services, Sub-committee, Nagpurwithin four weeks from today. Application disposed of. 2 Judge. Hsj