IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1570 of 2009 1. Rahamtullah Siddiqui. 2. Baraktullah Siddiqui. (Both sons of Late Nisar Ahmad , resident of village and P.O.- Khodaibagh, P.S.- Jalalpur(Now Khaira), Distt.- Saran). ….Petitioners Versus Most. Rafia Khatoon, wife of Late Nisar Ahmad, resident of village- Beladam, P.S.- Beligaon, Distt.- Vaishali. …..Opposite Party ----------- 3. 11.11.2011 The petitioners have preferred this revision application under Section 19 (4) of the Family Courts Act against the order dated 1.07.2009 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali at Hajipur in Maintenance Case No.15/2008 by which the petition filed on behalf of the petitioners regarding the maintainability of the maintenance case under Section 125 Cr.P.C. against them has been rejected. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the opposite party is not entitled to claim maintenance from the petitioners as they are not her sons and step mother cannot claim maintenance from her step sons. The learned counsel for the opposite party submits that the petitioners are sons of the husband of 2 opposite party. After the death of her husband, the petitioner no.2 has got employment on compassionate ground as the husband of opposite party was a Govt. servant and according to the provisions for getting employment on compassionate ground, it is also evident that the person, who get the employment on compassionate ground, he will have to maintain the dependants of the deceased. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the opposite party and on perusal of the materials on record, it appears that the contention of the learned counsel for the opposite party is correct. I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)