SINGLE BENCH; HO ‘I’BLE JUSTICE DHIRENDRA MISHRA \_N.P. [g No.3428l08 (Petition U/A 22'6/227 of the Constitution of India) 1. SK. Das, S/o J.L. Das, aged 59 years, raident of Street No.14, House No.C-35, Director Smriti Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti, Office of the Smriti Griha Nirman Sahkari Sanstha Marayadit Smn’ti Nagar, Bhilai, Durg (C.G.) 2. Sandeep Ramteke, S/o late A.R. Ramteke, 28 ‘ years, fesident of Street No.15, House No.C-70, Director, Smriti Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti, Omce of the Smrfti Griha Nirman Sahkari Sanstha Marayaclit Smriti Nagar, Bhilai; Durg (C.G.) 3. SR. Shanna, S/o 8.8. Rao, aged 62 years, resident of .C-23 Street No.7, Director,,Smriti Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti, Office of the Smriti r Griha Nirman Sahkari Sanstha Marayad’rt Smriti r Nagar, Bhilai, Durg (C.G.) 4. Aarti Arora, Dlo S.C.. Arora, aged 34 years, resident of Street No.7, Plot No.21 Director Smriti Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti, Gffice of the Smriti Griha Nirman Sahkari Sanstha Marayadit Smn'ti Nagar, Bhilai, Durg (C.G.) PETITIONERS Vs RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhath'sgarh, Through Secretary, artment of Co-operative Societies, D.K.S. B iiding, Mantralay, Raipur (C.G.) 2. R jeev Choubey, Director, Smriti Griha Nirman S hkari Samiti, Office of the Smriti Griha Nirman S hkari Sanstha Marayadit Smriti Nagar, Bhitai, D rg (C.G.) 8. D puty Registrar, Cooperative Society, District 4. Jo nt Registrar, Cooperative Society, District Durg 17.07.2008 Mr. T.K. Tiwari, Advoca e for the petitioners. Mr. Satish Gupta, G.A. or respondent No.1, 3 & 4 Heard. The petitioner has tiled the instant petition for following reliefs:- p . f z" “10.:1. to direct respon ‘ nts No.3 & 4 to take oVer the charge of the Society from the pondent No.2 and further a directioh may ’ kindly be issued ta respondent No.2 preventing him from exercising the p er of withdrawing the amount from the account of the soci ty as weii as making payment to anybody. 10.2 to direct responds t No.3 to make arrangement for eiections in the Society becau e 8 Directors have already resigned and as per the bye-taws th remaining 5 Directors cannot work." ' Learned counsel for th petitioner submits that during pendency of this petition respondent No.3 yi e order dated 3.7.2008 has superseded the Board of Directors of the Socie and appointed a Committee for conducting affairs of the society and th s, the Clause 10.1 of Relief Clause has become unnecessary. He fu her submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this pe ‘tion with liberty to raise other grievances before respondent No.3, who y decide the same in accordance with faw. Learned counsel for th State has no objection if the petition is disposed of with the aforesaid , rection. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to raise their disp tes. before the respondent No.3 which shall be decided by said authority in ccordance with law expeditiously. Consequently, LA. No.1 Certified copy as per rule .