IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 4TH OCTOBER 2011 / 12TH ASWINA 1933 WP(C).No. 26327 of 2011(M) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ------------ 1. VASUDEVAN NAIR,S/O.RAMAN NAIR, AGED 51 YEARS,KANDAMANGALAM HOUSE, MALAKUNNAM P.O, CHANGANASSERY. 2. V.K.SASI,S/O.KARUNAKARAN,AGED 58 YEARS, SASI MANDIRAM,MALAKUNNAM P.O, CHANGANASSERY. BY ADVS. SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN SRI.M.D.SASIKUMAR SRI.GEORGE MATHEW SRI.DIPU JAMES RESPONDENTS: ------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001. 2. COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY L.M.S BUILDINGS,PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 034. 3. JOINT DY.COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, L.M.S BUILDINGS, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 034. 4. PROJECT OFFICER, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM 686 001. JJJ WP(C).No. 26327 of 2011(M) 5. SECRETARY, MADAPPALLY BLOCK PANCHAYAT, MADAPPALLI P.O, CHANGANASSERY 686 546. 6. SECRETARY, KURICHI GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KURICHI P.O, CHANGANASSERY 686 549. BY SR. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JJJ WP(C).No. 26327 of 2011(M) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 30.12.2010. EXHIBIT P2. TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 24.08.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE JJJ P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J ----------------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 26327 OF 2011 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of October, 2011. JUDGMENT The case of the petitioners is as follows: “The 1st petitioner is the Convenor of beneficiary committee constituted for the construction of retaining wall of Illamkavu-chaladi padasekharam of chalachira, neerthadam and the 2nd petitioner is the Chairman and the said scheme is sought to be implemented through the Block Panchayat Hariyali Scheme. An agreement was entered into in between the 1st petitioner and the 6th respondent on 28.08.2010 and technical sanction and administrative sanction were also obtained for the execution of the said work. Thereafter, the 1st petitioner by expending Rs.7,00,000/- dumped rubbles, but the respondents did not pay the advance amount, raising certain technical objections. Exts.P1 and P2 representations submitted by the 1st petitioner were also not considered nor any amounts paid. Hence, this W.P.(C). 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3. In the given facts and circumstances, the third respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 representation in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of 'two months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment; of course after affording an opportunity of hearing. The petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a 2 WP(C) No. 26327/2011 copy of the Writ Petition before the 3rd respondent for further steps. The Writ Petition is disposed of. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE dnc