1 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 216 OF 2010 IN SUIT NO. 3282 OG 2009 Ramesh Kumar Jain . ...Plaintiff. Vs. Jeetubhai Trivedi & Ors. ...Defendants. ---- Mr. Anil Yadav, i/b D.R. Shah, for the Plaintiff. Mr. V.T. Dubey, for Defendant No.2. Mr. D.H. Mehta, i/b Pankaj Thatte, for Defendant No.3 and Respondents. None for Defendant No.1 though served. --- CORAM: R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 31st MARCH, 2010 P.C. 1. Mr. Yadav, learned Advocate appearing for the Plaintiff pressed for Chamber Summons on the ground that certain events have taken place after the institution of the suit and those events are required to be brought on record. He clarified that the Plaintiff is not seeking any interim relief in the Chmber Summons. 2. Mr. Mehta, learned counsel for Defendant No.3 and Respondents submits that Plaintiff wants to rely upon the conveyance dated 7.10.2009 annexed to the plaint as a part of the documents. However, entire conveyance is not being relied upon viz. power of attorney under which the said conveyance executed has not been relied upon. He also 2 submits that certain other documents in connection with the said conveyance have not been relied upon. 3. The Chamber Summons can be granted in terms of prayer clause (a) with direction that Plaintiff shall annexe to the plaint all the documents concerning the aforesaid conveyance dated 7.10.2009. 4. Hence, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). There shall no order as to costs. Amendment to be carried out as per the schedule. In addition to the documents mentioned in the schedule, Plaintiff shall annexe to the plaint all other documents which are concerned with the conveyance dated 7.10.2009. Plaintiff to carry out amendment on or before 21.4.2010, and serve upon the Defendants and present Respondents amended copy of the plaint on or before 7th May 2010. Suit stands adjourned to 10th June, 2010 for directions. (R.Y. GANOO, J.)