|cs^, angld Bench IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT CASE (Q No. -L^5 /2011 PETITIONER ^ /y/^x ...•'^ z / '<^' RESPONDENTS CONTEMNORS yHanslal s/o Shri Ramsharan, aged about 54 years, Occupation Service, R/o Satpata, Police Station Bishrampur, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS Mr. Mrityunjay Mishra, aged about 50 years, Chief GeneraJ Manager (P & A) S.E.C.L. Bilaspur (C.G.) Mr. Arvind Kumar, Aged about 48 years, Sub Area Manager, Rehar Gayatri Proj'ect, Jainagar, Sub Area Bishrampur, District Surguja (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UWDER ARTICLE' 215 OF CONSTITUTION READ WITH SECTION 10 & 12 CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT ^..s"^ /c^. I ^-:®.j T *<i*<<ni g^*si^» 7S[ "i||q|dA|, ^xl|<H<|(o, f5RTR?y ...(^i:....^.^...©±-^^JE-//' "-^200' ^n^T ^T^F ('ic<f^<i€r) ^I^I^RT^NT WT 311^? sf»^|ch ^"•uii^, Deepti ^<HW^f^T^T^T SB : Hon'bie Shri nflanindra Mohan 09-08-2011 Shri Atanu Ghosh, counsei fcjr the petitioner. Eariier a contempt petltion contempt case No.39/11. That p^lition was disposed off vide order dated 7/2/2011 giving iiberty to the petitiotier to revive the same in case, no orders are passed within reasonabte perio^. In the instant petitlon, neithe|r any averment has been made nor any representation has been filed to sh to the notice of the respondents. Therefore, 1 am not tnctin^d to issue notice at this stage. The petitioner shouid bring to the not 7/2/2011 passed by this Court. if liberty to take recourse to remedy ^ <^j^F^<i1i 1Rpraf ^ feTst ^R?^ ^3ffmW^T hrivastava, J. vas filed by the petitioner registered as w that order dated 7/2/201 1 was brought ;e ot' the respondents, the order dated no orders are passed wrthin two months from the date of receipt of order d^ted 7/2/2011 , the petitioner wouid be at s may be avaiiabte to him under the law. C|!& With the aforesaid observati4ns, the petition is flnaSly disposed off. Sd/" Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ^ra^r^^r^uii^, ^Rf^t^—ps/140—2/2011—1,50,000.