IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA MONDAY, THE 14TH JUNE 2010 / 24TH JYAISTHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 3540 of 2010() --------------------------------- CMP.3395/2010 of J.M.F.C.-I, CHENGANNUR CRIME NO. 398/2010 OF CHENGANNUR POLICE STATION .................... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 2 : ------------------------------------ 1. LIBIN THANKACHAN, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.THANKACHAN, NADUVELIPARAMBIL THEKKETHIL VEEDU, PERISSERY MURI, PULIYOOR VILLAGE. 2. RAJESH SHARMA, AGED 22 YEARS. S/O.GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI, KARINGALIL HOUSE, PENNUKKARA MURI, ALA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.V.ANIL (K/1480/98) RESPONDENT: --------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. (CRIME 398 OF 2020 OF CHENGANUR POLICE STATION OF CHENGANUR POLICE STATION). BY SRI. M.S.BREEZ PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K. HEMA, J. --------------------------- B.A. No. 3540 of 2010 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 14th day of June, 2010 O R D E R This petition is for bail. 2. The alleged offence is under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution, on 08.05.2010 at about 12 A.M., petitioners (A1 and A2) along with two others committed robbery of Rs.1650/- and a mobile phone from the possession of de facto complainant after causing hurt to him. 3. Petitioners were arrested on 10.05.2010 and they are in custody for the past 35 days. This petition is strongly opposed. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that articles were recovered after the arrest of petitioners and on pursuant to their disclosure statement. The offence alleged is serious in nature and it is not fit to grant bail to petitioners at this stage, it is submitted. 4. On hearing both sides, considering the stage of investigation and the serious nature of the offence, I am not inclined to grant bail to petitioners at this stage. This petition is dismissed. K. HEMA, JUDGE ln