IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1508 of 2009 GOLU THAKUR @ JITENDRA THAKUR @ JITENDER KUMAR THAKUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5 24.11.2009 Heard. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner like Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kumar Singh was not named in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that in course of investigation, it appeared that he alongwith others was seen wondering near the place of occurrence some days earlier to the incident. Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kumar Singh is allowed bail by regular court and having privilege under Section 12 of Justice Juvenile(child, care and protection)Act, the petitioner’s bail has been refused, which in my view also is not justified. In the circumstances, this revision is allowed. The order dated 22.8.2008 passed by the Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, in Cr.Appeal No.68/2008 as also order dated 17.7.2008 passed in G.R.No.3597/2007, Tr.No.1197/2008, by Juvenile Justice Board, Muzaffarpur, are set aside. Petitioner Golu Thakur @ Jitendra Thakur @ Jitender Kumar Thakur is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Juvenile Justice Board, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Muzaffarpur 2 TownP.S.CaseNo.507/2007,G.R.No.3597/2007,Tr.No.1197/2008.One of the bailors should be father of the petitioner. SKBOSE (Mandhata Singh)