-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 286 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8172 OF 2010 M/s. Fineflex Coilcords Pvt. Ltd. ....Appellants versus Mr. Pravin Ramchandra More ...Respondent Mr. N.A. Kulkarni for the appellants. None for the respondent. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR , JJ. DATE: DECEMBER 21, 2010. P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. In our view, the Labour Court has properly considered the fact about resignation and it has been found that the resignation is a doubtful document. Cogent reasons have been given in paragraph 10 of the order in this behalf. After appreciating the evidence, it is found that the concerned workman has proved that his services have been illegally terminated on the basis of such resignation. The learned single Judge has also affirmed the said finding of the Labour Court. In our view, this is not a case in which the aforesaid orders and more particularly well reasoned order of the Labour Court are required to be interfered in this appeal. The fact finding authority has also found that the so-called resignation is not a genuine resignation at all. The LPA is accordingly dismissed. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.