IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2008 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1930 WP(C).No. 10410 of 2008(L) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 28/11/2007 IN IA 1484/07 IN OS.82/2003 of MUN-MAGI COURT, PARAVOOR .................... PETITIONER: -------------------- MOHANAKURUP, S/O.GANGADHARAN PILLAI, THOTTUMPURATHU VEEDU, KURUMANDAL, PARAVUR, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. SUKESAN, AMBIKA VILASAM, KOTTAPPURAM, PARAVUR, KOLLAM. 2. DEVAYANI, AMBIKA VILASAM, KOTTAPPURAM, PARAVUR, KOLLAM. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss M.N.KRISHNAN, J ===================== W.P.(C) No.10410 OF 2008 ===================== Dated this the 2nd day of April 2008 JUDGMENT This writ petition is preferred to set aside Exts.P2 and P3 order and judgment. Ext.P2 is an order in an application for issuance of a Commission. By Ext.P3 , the suit has been dismissed. When the suit is dismissed, the party has to take appropriate steps for redressal of his grievance. Therefore, I close this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to move for appropriate relief against the dismissal of the suit. It is also made clear that in such an event the dismissal of the application for issuance of a Commission on restoration will not be a bar to file a fresh application for the very same prayer. M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE Cdp/-