1 IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.663 OF 2005 Mr.Parvinder Singh Arora. ..Petitioner. V/s. Mr.Kuldeep Singh & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.Kafil Khan for petitioner. Ms.G.P.Mulekar, APP for State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J A.M.KHANWILKAR,J A.M.KHANWILKAR,J DATE DATE DATE : DECEMBER 9, 2005. : DECEMBER 9, 2005. : DECEMBER 9, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. Heard. The grounds raised before this Court can be effectively answered by the Revisional Court. 2. As alternative efficacious remedy is available to the petitioner by way of revision before the Sessions Court in view of the decision of this Court in the case of V.K.Jain & Ors. vs. Pratap V.K.Jain & Ors. vs. Pratap V.K.Jain & Ors. vs. Pratap V.Padode V.Padode V.Padode reported in 2005(3) Mh.L.J. 778, reported in 2005(3) Mh.L.J. 778, reported in 2005(3) Mh.L.J. 778, no interference is warranted. 3. This petition is disposed of with liberty to take recourse to remedy of revision, if so advised. All questions are left open. 4. The petitioner to file such Revision 2 Application within four weeks from today. Till such time, no precipitative action be taken against the Petitioner. Revision Application, if filed within four weeks from today, be considered on its own merits in accordance with law. 5. In case, there is delay in filing Revision Application, Court will take into account the fact that the petitioner had first approached this Court, which period may be excused in computing delay. 6. Petition disposed of on the above terms.