IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No.537 of 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 151 of 2006 Umashankar Vikramjit Singh ..Applicant. Vs. Rohit Kantikumar Nichani and The State of Maharashtra ..Respondents. Mr Shreeram Shirsat, i/b A.B.G. Associates for the applicants. Mr A.M. Saraogi, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr U. V. Nikam, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.2. CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No.538 of 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 150 of 2006 Umashankar Vikramjit Singh ..Applicant. Vs. Kantikumar Nichani and The State of Maharashtra ..Respondents. Mr Shreeram Shirsat, i/b A.B.G. Associates for the applicants. Mr A.M. Saraogi, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr U. V. Nikam, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.2. CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No.539 of 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 149 of 2006 Umashankar Vikramjit Singh ..Applicant. Vs. Avinash Kantikumar Nichani and The State of Maharashtra ..Respondents. Mr Shreeram Shirsat, i/b A.B.G. Associates for the applicants. Mr A.M. Saraogi, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr U. V. Nikam, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V. C. DAGA,J. V. C. DAGA,J. V. C. DAGA,J. DATED: DATED: DATED: 18TH OCT, 2007. 18TH OCT, 2007. 18TH OCT, 2007. P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. Perused revision applications. 3. Draft of Consent Terms/ Minutes of order dated 18.10.2007 duly signed by the applicant, respondent No.1 and learned Advocates for the parties, are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 4. In view of Minutes of order, impugned orders dated 11th October, 2006 passed in all the above cases by the Sessions Court in Criminal Appeal Nos. 149 to 151 of 2006 are set aside and the proceedings are remitted back for decision afresh. The Lower Appellate Court is directed to dispose of all these Appeals as expeditiously as possible within two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. The revision applications Nos. 537 of 2007 to 539 of 2007 are disposed of in terms of the said compromise pursis with no order as to costs. 6. Parties are permitted to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (V.C. (V.C. (V.C. DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.) DAGA,J.)