IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.52784 of 2008 1. ARUN KUMAR SINHA @ PAPPU son of Late Vimal Prasad, Resident of R.P.S. More, Near Arya Samaj Mandir, P.S. Danapur, District- Patna 2. Dablu Kumar son of Late Gorakh Lal, resident of village- Amiawar, P.S. Nasariganj, District- Rohatas …Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR & 2. Sunita Sinha, Daughter of Shri Bageshwari Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- Kucha Gali, Ward No.19, Daudnagar, P.S. Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad …Opposite Parties ----------- 3/ 19.04.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners have sought quashing of the entire proceeding including the order dated 27.05.2008 passed in Complaint Case No.181 of 2008 (Tr. No.145 of 2008) pending before the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad, by which cognizance has been taken under sections 498-A, 354, 379, 323 and 504 Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted by the parties that now an application under section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act has been filed before the Family Court, Aurangabad, since they have arrived at an understanding that they should amicably end the marriage without any liability on either side. By the said compromise, the petitioners were to deposit rupees two lacs in favour of the opposite party no.2 which has already been done and the money is lying in the account of the opposite party no.2 which she would be entitled to withdraw after final orders in the matrimonial proceedings. By the same understanding, the opposite party no.2 was also to withdraw the present complaint petition. 2 In view of the understanding arrived at between the parties, entire proceeding including the order dated 27.05.2008 passed in Complaint Case No.181 of 2008 (Tr. No.145 of 2008) pending before the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad, is hereby quashed. The Family Court, Aurangabad, is directed to pass final orders in Matrimonial Case No. 19 of 2010 within a period of three months. It goes without saying that thereafter the opposite party no.2 would be entitled to withdraw the money which has been deposited by the petitioners in her account. The application stands allowed. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)