y .y w ffi 9 t'iM l-^s SEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.NO..^'.6/...../©fr&' Petitioner"^y" ^y^ ..••"' l^s^ •.^^:;>y ^y^ y/' y Respondents: cb^to Wli^pv1f- Champa Lal Nagwamsi, S/o Late LagguRam, Aged aboaut 52 years, R/o Kenkuri Saliatoli, Irrigation Colony, Jeshpur Dist. C.G. State. Versus 1). State of Chhatisgarh Through: Secretary, Water Resources Departinent DKS Bhawan, Raipur Dist. CG State, 2) Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Bilaspur. CG State, WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE_226^ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OP APROPRIATE WRIT(S) / ORDER (S) / DIREDCTION (S), CTC, ^ HK5H COURT OF CHHATTTSSARH AT EILASPUft W. P. fe) No. 501 of 2007 Petitioner : Champo Lal Ncgwamsi - Versus- Respondents : State of Chhatt-isgarh and another Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Shri K.R. htair, Advocate for Ihe Petitioner. Shri &»tish Supta, Deputy fiovemment Advocate for the respondenTs/5taTe, f1< > OROER (Passed on this 25th doy of January, 2007) 1. Learned counsel cppearing for the petitioner submits that one T.G. Rnmchandra Kurup simitarly situated employee had filed a writ petition, bsing W.P. No. 670 of 2004. wherein this Court after consklering the facts of the case granted liberty to the petitioner to make a reppesenlation to the competent cuthority of the respondents. The competent authori-ty of the reqsondents. in tum, was directed t6 decide the case of the petitioner on its own merit, in accordance with law, as earty as possible, preferably. within three months from the date of recept of the representation. It is furtiier ajbmittect that several other persons have also opprocKhed this Court- in like manner and on their representations, the competent au't+iority of the reqiondents has gronted relief. Furttier, the compe-tent authority of +he respondents has declined to grant any relief to those persons, who had not opproached to this Court. 2. In the light of the nbove subroission, the petitioner is 9ranted liberty to make detailed representation to the competent outhority of the respondents. On such representation, being fited by the petitioner. the competent authority of the reqiondents shnll consider ouid decide the same on its own merit, in accordonce with law, as early as possibte, preferably, wi-thin a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation. 3. The writ petition is accordingty disposed of. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Bablu ?K