1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25.11.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P(MD)No.13479 of 2011 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 S.Jeeva :Petitioner -Vs- 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary to Government, Home Department, St.George Fort, Chennai - 600 009. 2. The Director General of Police, D.G.P.Office,Chennai - 06. 3. The Principal/Superintendent of Police, Police Training College, Ashok Nagar, Chennai. 4. The Commandant, Tamil Nadu Special Police, Ist Battalion, Tiruchirappalli. :Respondents Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in pursuant to the impugned order passed by the fourth respondent in Na.Ka.No.A1/122/Ka.Pa.Pa/2010, dated 03.05.2010 and to quash the same and consequently, to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service as Grade-II Woman Constable with all attendant and monetary benefits. For Petitioner :M/s.So.Paramasivam For Respondents :Mr.T.R.Janarthanan, Addl.Govt.Pleader ORDER The petitioner, who was appointed as Woman Constable Grade-II in Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services on 15.03.2010 with a direction to go for a training,after joining the post, she also went for training on 01.04.2010 After attending twenty days of training, the Drill Instructor has put more pressure on the petitioner to do all training exercise during the training period. It was pleaded, the method adopted by the Drill Instructor was in a way amounting to torture, hence,the Petitioner felt ashamed and mentally affected. As a result, she made an application to resign from the post of Woman Constable Grade-II. Finally on 03.05.2010, she submitted her letter of resignation before the fourth respondent/the Commandant, Tamil Nadu Special Police, Ist Battalion, Tiruchirappalli. Since the petitioner herself on her own volition came forward and submitted her letter of resignation mentioning all the difficulties in taking the training as well as accepting the employment, the fourth respondent accepted the letter of resignation and passed the impugned order, dated 03.05.2010. Aggrieved by the said order, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 the petitioner has come to this Court with a delay of one year and seven months to reinstate the petitioner in service by quashing the impugned order. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only out of frustration and unwanted method adopted by the Drill Instructor, the petitioner was constrained to submit her letter of resignation. Accepting the resignation, she was relieved from the service, such an impugned order requires to be quashed now,be pleaded. But the said submission made by the petitioner to interfere with the impugned order, dated 03.05.2010 cannot be considered for the reason that the petitioner at no point of time has mentioned that only on account of indifferent attitude shown by the Drill Instructor, the petitioner had to submit her letter of resignation. When the petitioner herself had chosen to resign from the post of Woman Constable Grade-II, for her own difficulties, it is not open for the petitioner with a delay of one and half year to reconsider the request of the petitioner Accordingly, this Court finds no merit in the Writ Petition, hence, the same is liable to be dismissed. 3.Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1. The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, St.George Fort, Chennai - 600 009. 2. The Director General of Police, D.G.P.Office,Chennai - 06. 3. The Principal/Superintendent of Police, Police Training College, Ashok Nagar, Chennai. 4. The Commandant, Tamil Nadu Special Police, Ist Battalion, Tiruchirappalli. +1CC to The Special Government Pleader. SR.No.41625. Vsn RP/29.12.2011/2P/6C. W.P(MD)No.13479 of 2011 25.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/