5«^i!ii LNJTHE HLGH COURTLOF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WP(S) No3>S~S~S~'QF 2006 PETITIONER \^ ...-•"^>- .^^? >.-^<r"..^"" ^M-^"" ^^' Kumar Singh Kanwar Aged about 39 years S/o Shri Jaipal Singh Kanwar Occupation: Service Working as Forest Range Offjcer Sonhat Forest Range Baikunthpur Forest Division District Koriya R/o Forest Campus Sonhat, District Koriya Chhattisgarh ^ VERSUS <S?K fldi ^:\ ^A RESPONDENTS /• 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Government of Chhattisgarh Department of Forest Mantralaya DKS Bhawan Raipur, Chhattisgarh ^ 2. Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Jail Road Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. S.N.Ojha ^^ff-^ Forest Range Officer Manendragarh District Koriya y WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OR WRITS IN THE NATURE QF CERTIORARL IVIANDAMUS, DIRECTION QR ORDER ORJTH^ IJKE %1%^ •'.,w XI-HC-78 *11HMI Sft*ll^l 3^'^rpTRra', ^Tn+i'ie, Ridiy^ A^.f. A9.»>..S.^^J^.^; 200 3TT^?T<raW ('pfg^ST) 3TI^r9iTR-fi+ ^SIT3TT^?T^TN? ^<. 01 BEB-ve ^ ^ S^TTWErfN 3n^?T wifepfrr wicft'if teA rfSreerc ^?3i1^T3n^r 19.7.2006:- iard Shri Saurabh Dangi, counse]| for the petitioner. ^tiss DipaU Pandey, P.L. for the Sf] By the instant petition, fhe petitior^ ate'respondents No.l and 2, on advance copy. er has auestioned the order dated 7 Julv 2006 Armexure-P/1 whereby he has been transfeb'ed from Koriya Vahnandal to Manendraaarh Vanmandal. The main ground of challenge is i^iat the post on which the setitioner has been transterred is not vacant as respondent N(t>.3 is alreadv posted on that post and without transfemng respondent No.3 petitioner ha^ been transferred on tisit post. In the circuinstanees, leamed ccjunse! for the petitioner submitted that the oetitioner mav be allowed to make a reores^ntation to respondent NQ. 1 and he be directed to decide the same, to which leamed dounsel for respondents No.l and 2 has no objection. Ka^-ina heard leamsd counsel fo| circumstsnces of ths case, and without exj the prayer made by ieamed counssl fo( Therefore, the petitioner is allowed to ma[ of ihis petition to respondent No. 1 raisin| fi-om today and in tum, respondent No. 1 ^ [ the parties, having regard to the faets and sressnie any opinion on the merits of the case, tiie petitioner is just, fair and reasonable. ;s a detsiled representation along with a copy t ail his erievances within a period of 10 days |hali decide the rapresentation of fhe petitioner within a period of 30 days from the date (ifreceipt ofths representatiQn, m an objective maroier, after considering ali the points rai^ed by the petitioner, m accordance with Isw. However, the effect and operati^n of the impugned order in respeci of the petitioner is staved, til! the representation oitoe peTitioner is decided. With the direction aforssaid, the ^etition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.'3V.)P. No.27fi7/2006 and I.A. No.6892/2006 also stand disposed 6£ Parties are entitled for certified cdpv oftbis order. Sd.»- L.C. Shsaoo Judge P.T.O.