Cr.MP(M) No. 1 of 2010 23.2.2010 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rana, Assistant Advocate General, for the respondent. The petitioner filed the instant petition for his pre-arrest bail as he is apprehending his arrest in the non-bailable offences pursuant to the FIR No. 316 of 2005 registered in Police Station, Una. Precisely the case of the prosecution is that the complainant Julfi Ram has been owner of one shop situated in village Jhalera wherein Shri Sushil Kumar was a tenant. Since the said shop was not economical viable to its owner, he contacted Smt. Sandhya Devi to sell this shop to her, but she refused. On 12th December, 2002 the shop was sold by the complainant to Smt. Neelam Kumari for a consideration of Rs. 40,000/-, to this effect a sale deed was also executed. In the month of January 2005 complainant aforesaid received the summons from the Court then he came to know that the petitioner herein had instituted a suit for specific performance basing his claim on the strength of a written agreement with respect to the same shop with the petitioner and said Neelam Kumari for a consideration of Rs. 3,00,000/-. The earnest money was stated to have been paid to the tune of Rs. 2,50,000/- and according to the said agreement the sale deed was required to be executed on or before 15.12.2002. It is alleged in the FIR that the petitioner in connivance with the other accused persons fabricated the written agreement aforesaid. Thus, he lodged report in Police Station, Una under Sections 418, 419, 420, 465, 471 readwith Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner. Cr.MP(M) No. 1 of 2010 Pursuant to the last orders passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation of this case. He was also granted interim bail. The agreement in question has been taken into possession alongwith stamp vender’s register. In the aforesaid circumstances, no fruitful purpose will be served by retaining the petitioner in the custody. Therefore, in view of (2010) 1 Supreme Court Cases 679, HDFC Bank Limited vs J.J. Mannan alias J.M. John Paul and another, the interim bail granted on 4.1.2010 is hereby confirmed till the filing of the charge sheet by the police in the trial court and the petitioner is at liberty to move an application for the consideration of his regular bail. This pre-arrest bail shall be subject to the following conditions that the petitioner:- (i) shall join the investigation of this case as and when required by the police and shall also present himself in the Court as and when required to do so. (ii) shall not make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts and circumstances of this case to as to dissuade him fro disclosing such facts to the court or the Police station. Needless to say that if the petitioner flouts any of the conditions aforesaid, the liberty of the bail shall be cancelled. Application stands disposed of. Copy dasti. (Surinder Singh), J. 23rd February, 2010 (vs)