> $- * + % IN THE HIGH COURT 01< DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 771/2010 SUMER SINGH ..... Petitioner versus Through: Mr. Naresh C. Sharma and Mr. Puncet Singh Arora, Adv. STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... CORAM: Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, APP for respondent no.1. Mr. Mukesh Nirwan, Adv. for respondent no.2. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA ORDER 27.04.2010 v I have heard the statement made by respondent no.2. I have spoken to the petitioner and respondent no.2 with regard to the alleged injuries suffered by respondent no.2. --ti;. Father of respondent no. 2 is also present in Court and he/:lso stated that FIR should be quashed. In view of the compromise and the statement made by the complainant, the present petition is allowed and FIR No. 429/2005, U/s 324/406/498A, Police Station Najafgarh, Delhi and the resultant proceeding emanating therefrom arc quashed. Petition is disposed of. -·)[ L__ SANJIV KHANNA, J. APRIL 27, 2010. Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified