^ 2-- HIQH COURT OF CHHATTJSGARH: BILASPUR. 'Writ Petltlon No. 257 of 1999 Pefitiosier Respondents Laxman Kumar, Son of Jai Knshna Agharlya, resldent of Devaibhanta, TahsH Saraipail, Distt. Mahasamund. Versus 1) State of M.P. through Secretar/, Deptt. of Pancnayat; Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopai. 2) Coliector, Mahasamund. 3) S.D.0., Saraipaii, Distt. Mahasamund. 4) Gram Panchayat, Devaibhanta, thfDugh Sarpanch, Gram Panohayat Devalbhanta, Tahsii Saraipaij, Distt. Mahasamund. 5) Laiit Kumar, son o? Jagmonan, sresident of Devajbhanta, TRahsl! Sarajpati, Distt. Mahasamund. (WritPetitionunderArticle 226/227 oftheConstitution of india.) SB: Hon'bte rvir. Satish K. Agnihotrl, J. Presersfc None for the petlttoner Shrl Yashwant Slngh Thakur, Dy. Advocate General fbr the State. (Passed on 28th day ofApril, 2008) The matter is caiied for hesring twioe. On both ocoasions, none appears nor is any representatlon made on behaif of the petltioner The petitioner may not be interested in the matter; 2) In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3) Registry of this Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the petitioner, forthwith. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Raiu