IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 7 OF 2009 MS. MARTHA FURTADO AND ANR., ... Petitioners Versus SMT. FATIMA ELECTRA JASMINA D\'SILVA THROUGH ATTORNEY PEDRO DAMIAO NAZARO CAEIRO ... Respondent Mr. A. D. Bhobe, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr C. A. Coutinho, Advocate for the Respondent. Coram:- R. M. SAVANT, J. Date:- 13th November, 2009 P.C. A preliminary issue was raised on behalf of the Applicants that the suit is barred under Order IX Rule 8 in view of the previous suit that was filed by the Respondent herein. The Trial Court heard the parties on the said preliminary issue and rejected the application filed on the ground that the preliminary issue be tried with the other issue in the suit as evidence is required to be led. 2. Considering the issue raised, in my view, the Order of the Trial Court cannot be faulted with. No case for interference in the revisional jurisdiction is made out. 3. Civil Revision Application is accordingly dismissed. R. M. SAVANT, J. arp/*