^- \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (c) N0.'3^^/2007 PETITIONER ^-l":"^'y:-r^ ^^^^-^ <^^::!:.:...--^^o- ...-•••" ^0-' VERSUS RESPONDENTS d? >-*" <<15^? rf l ^^ • (S.n^tMiki^ » -Rajendra Prasad Gupta, S/o Shri A.P. Gupta, aged 52 years, Occupation- Cultivator, R/oVillage- Songara, Tahsil- Pratappur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) \. State of C.G. through Secretary, Department of Co-Operative, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) • 2. Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, State of Chhattisgarh, Telibanda Chowk Raipur (C.G.) 3. Coltector, Sarguja ^' District- Sarguja (C.G.) ^-4-. Returning Officer, Schedule Tribe Sewa Sahkari Samiti, Songara, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 5. Bannu Ram, R/o Village- Bojha, Tahsil- Pratappur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 6<' Samay Lal, R/o Village- ^ Bojha, Tahsil- Pratappur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 7. Ram Pratap Singh, R/o Village- Bojha, Tahsil- Pratappur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 8. Jai Bahadur, R/o Village- Songara, Tahsil- Pratappur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FQRJSSUANCEJ)FASUITABLE WRIT, QRDERS AND DIRECTION ^) Petitioner HICH COURT ORCHHATTI8GAKH AT BILASPtR WRTTPETmON (QNO. 32480F2007 Rajendra Prasad Gupta Versus State ofChtettisgarh & Others Respondents WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION QF BWIA (SB : Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.) , j Present:- Shri Rajeev Shrivastava witfi Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advoc^es for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy. GovL Advocate forthe State. ORDEKfORAD | (Passed ori 09th d^ ofAugust, 2010) ^ 1. The petitioner, by way ofthis petition, sedks a writ to quaA order &ted 17/5/2007 passed by the respondent No.4, wfaereby the noinination paper of the petitioner has been rejected and fiulfaer a Kst of contesting candi&tes „ issued under provisions of Rule 41(11) of C.G. Cc»-operative Soraetfes Rules, 1962. The election has already beentaken place on 17/5^2007. • 2. ChaUengeinthispetitionistotherejeGtionofn<MninationpapercatMM>tbei decided by tiiis petition under Section 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia. The petitioner may take reeourse ofonly the election petition, which is provided under the provisions of Section 64(2)(v) ofthe C.G. Co-operative Societies Act,1960. 3. At this stage, it is informed by Shri Bhatia, leamed Dy. Govt. AdvocMe that election petition is ah'eady pending consideration. 4. In view of that, Ifaere is no merit in this case. Thus, the petition is dismissed.No order asto costs., Satish K. Asnihotri Judge Ashok ^