IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1289 of 2010 PALTAN CHOUDHARY SON OF LATE THAKUR CHOUDHARY. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 28/01/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 364 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that during the pendency of the bail application, the Sessions Judge called for a report about the veracity of the complaint and it transpired that there was an earlier dispute between the parties on account of which the petitioner had been suspected to have committed this occurrence even though there is no cogent material to support the same. Taking into consideration the aforesaid material as also that the petitioner has remained in custody since 7.9.2009, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, in connection with Complaint Case No. C 629 of 2001, Tr. No. 270 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the 2 petitioner. (ii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)