1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4892 OF 2009 Badrinath s/o Sheshrao Madan & ors ..PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Mah. & ors. ..RESPONDENTS Mr P.D. Bachate, Advocate for the petitioners; Mr N. N. Jadhav, A.G.P. for respondents. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE : 28th July, 2009 PER COURT : This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioner prays for directing the respondents to construct a road through various Gut numbers of the agricultural lands which are given in the prayer clause. The petitioners object to the construction of a bridge instead of a road. According to us, the respondents are the authorities who are equipped with the necessary expertise to decide the question as to whether a bridge is required to be constructed or a road is required to be constructed. In any event, if the petitioners are aggrieved by the construction of a bridge or the construction of a road or from the construction of a road from different lands, the petitioners may submit their representations, if not submitted so far, to the respondents no.4, 5 & 6. If the representations are so submitted, the respondents 2 no.4, 5 & 6 shall deal with them and decide them in accordance with law. In the light of the limited directions which we are inclined to issue, we do not consider it necessary to issue notice to respondents no.4, 5 & 6. 2. We have heard Shri P.D. Bachate, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Shri N.N. Jadhav, learned A.G.P. on behalf of respondents no.1 & 3. In the light of that, this writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioners of submitting a representation, with no order as to costs. [ A.V. POTDAR, J. ] [ P.V.HARDAS, J.] amj/wp4892.09