IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 699 of 2009 (M/S) S.C.Mathur S/O Sri K.D. Mathur R/O 180, Nariship Mandir Marg, Dehradun, District Dehradun and another. …….. Petitioners. Versus Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court-IV, Dehradun and another. … Respondents. Sri Gopal narain, learned counsel for the petitioners. Sri Sudhir Kumar, learned Brief Holder for the respondent no.1. Date May 15, 2009. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. The only prayer made in this writ petition is that the respondent no.1-Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court IV, Dehradun be directed to dispose of Misc. Civil Appeal No. 193 of 2006 S.C.Mathur and another Vs. Chandra Kiran Bahuguna, pending in that court within a time frame. A perusal of the record shows that that the petitioners having been aggrieved by the order dated 7-10-2006 of the trial court (Civil Judge (Senior Division) Dehradun), granting temporary injunction in favour of the plaintiff-respondent no.2 in the suit, filed the said Misc. Appeal before the respondent no.1. It has been alleged by the petitioners that the respondent no. 2 in order to prolong the litigation and to enjoy the temporary injunction granted by the trial court has been adopting dilatory tactics. Having heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners, I am of the view that to meet the ends of justice, a direction may be issued to the appellate court to decide the Misc. Appeal referred to above expeditiously on merits. The Additional District Judge/FTC IV Dehradun is directed to decide the Misc. Appeal No. 193 of 2006, S.C. Mathur Vs. Chandra Kiran Bahuguna, pending in that court expeditiously on merits, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally, Costs easy. (B.S. Verma, J.) RCP