1 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3777 OF 2010 Pralhad Shankar Beldar ...Petitioner vs. Dada Namdeo Beldar & Ors. ...Respondents Mr.M.J.Jamdar for the petitioner Mr.Kuldeep S. Patil i/b Mr.Prashan Hagare for respondent Nos.1 and 2 CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : MAY 7, 2010 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 who are the decree holders. It is not in dispute that the survey nos.27/3 and 25/1 in respect of which decree of perpetual injunction has been passed now form a part of the Gat no.165. The grievance of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that another survey no.27/1 forms part of Gat no.165 and that the impugned order passed below application at Exhibit-100 relates to entire Gat no.165 and is not confined to survey nos.27/3 and 25/1. The learned counsel for the 1 st and 2 nd respondents states that survey no.27/1 is of ownership of 1 st and 2 nd respondents. 2 The Decree of injunction relates to Survey nos.27/3 and 25/1. Hence, the order below application Exhibit-100 has to be confined to these two survey numbers which now form part of Gat no.165. To that extent, the impugned order below application at Exhibit-100 will have to be 2 modified. 3 Hence, the petition is disposed of by passing the following order : i) Impugned order dated 9 th February 2010 passed below application at Exhibit-100 is modified. The order will apply only to the suit property bearing survey nos.27/3 and 25/1. ii)Petition is disposed of in above terms. JUDGE