IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2973/2010 LAXMAN GAIDHANE ..VS.. KRISHI UTPANAA BAZAR SAMITI AND ANOTHER - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : JANUARY 24, 2011. Shri Vyawahare, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the decree was not joint and several, the respondent could not have filed execution proceedings only against the petitioner and it was necessary for the respondent/ decree holder to file execution proceeding against all the judgment debtors. Shri Sharma, the learned counsel for the decree holder states that the decree holder does not have any objection for joining the judgment debtors as parties to the execution proceedings. In view of the aforesaid statement made by Shri Sharma, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to raise appropriate objections before the executing court in accordance with law. Hence permission and liberty as prayed for is granted. It is however, made clear that the observations made by the executing court in the impugned order would not prejudice the case of either of the parties at further stages of the proceedings. Writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE SMP