IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 1571 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 12/11/2008 in WP NO : 20141 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 The Hyderabad Public School Society, 1-11-87 & 88, Begumpet, S.P. Road, Hyderabad - 16, Rep by its President 2 The Board of Governors, The Hyderabad Public School, Hyderabad - 16, Rep by its Chairman, 3 The Principal, The Hyderabad Public School, Hyderabad - 16. ..... APPELLANTS AND M. David Sam Roy, S/o. Sri M, David Roy, The Hyderabad Public School, 1-11-87 & 88, Begumpet, S.P. Road, Hyderabad - 16. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellants : THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent : MR.G.VIDYASAGAR The Court made the following : ORDER : (Per Hon’ble Sri Anil R.Dave, CJ) Admit. At the request of the learned advocate appearing for the appellants, the appeal is finally heard today. Upon hearing the learned advocates and looking to the facts of the case, in our opinion, balance of convenience is in favour of the appellants for the reason that if ultimately the order of termination of the original petitioner, who was a probationer, is quashed and set aside, the original petitioner can be very well compensated in terms of money. In the circumstances, on this short ground, we allow the appeal and quash and set aside the impugned interim order passed by the learned single Judge. It is, however, clarified that looking to the facts of the case and more particularly when the respondent- employee is not in service, the Registry shall notify writ petition No.20141 of 2008 for final hearing on 7th December 2008. _________________ ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 28th November 2008 ______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J ajr