1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition (MD)No.13042 of 2011 Durai Singam, S/o.Sreenivasan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Thanjavur District. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District. 3.The District Manager, TASMAC, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation given by the petitioner, dated 21.10.2011. For Petitioner : M.A.Arun Prasad For Respondents : Mr.R.Anandharaj, 1 & 2 Govt.Advocate. For Respondent-3 : Mr.Muniasami O R D E R [Order of the Court was made BY K.N.BASHA, J] Mr.R.Anandharaj, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for respondents 1 and 2. Mr.Muniasami, learned Standing Counsel for TASMAC, takes notice for the 3rd respondent. By mutual consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final hearing at the time of admission itself. 2.The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents to consider his representation, dated 21.10.2011, wherein the petitioner has sought for shifting of TASMAC Shop No.79/18, as it is causing great hardship to the general public. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that inspite of the representation of the petitioner, dated 21.10.2011, no action was taken and hence the petitioner was constrained to approach this Court with this petition with the aforesaid prayer. 4.Heard the learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Standing Counsel for TASMAC for respondent No.3 on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 5.We have carefully considered the submissions by both sides and also perused the affidavit filed in support of the petition and also other materials produced before this Court. 6.In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without going into the merits of the representation of the petitioner and without expressing any view on such representation, this Court is constrained to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 21.10.2011, by affording an opportunity to the petitioner and to other relevant parties, and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7.With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) / True Copy / Sub Assistant Registrar To: 1.The District Collector, Thanjavur District. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District. 3.The District Manager, TASMAC, Thanjavur District. +1CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR : 40133 SR : 28.11.2011 : 2p/5c ORDER IN WP(MD)No.13042 of 2011 Dated:16.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/