IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-31674 of 2010 Date of decision : 16.08.2011 Gurpreet Singh ....Petitioner V/s State of Punjab and others ....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Bhardwaj, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel submits that the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar did not find it expedient to invoke the provision of Section 340 Cr.P.C. in the instant case. According to him, court came to the conclusion that it was mere concealment of facts which may not strictly attract the provision of Section 340 Cr.P.C. He further submits that liberty has been granted by the court below to the petitioner to pursue independent remedy, if any, available. Thus, no interference is called for in inherent jurisdiction of this court. However, counsel for the petitioner who earlier in the day sought time to seek instructions, is not present on the second call. Dismissed for non-prosecution. August 16, 2011 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE