WP(C) 5026/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Saikia, le arned standing counsel, PWD appearing for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that though pursuant to various work orders issued by the authority from time to time, he executed al l the works to the satisfaction of all concerned, an amount of Rs.3,78,993/- (Ru pees Three Lakhs Seventy Eight Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety Three) is still due and payable to him, which has not been paid to him despite various approaches ma de. The learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the issue in the present writ petition has already been answered in Tamsher Ali & Ors. -Vs- State of Ass am & Ors. reported in 2008(4) GLT 1 and as such the present writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the directions contained in the aforesaid judgment. Having regard to the facts and circumstances as projected by the petitioner in t he present petition and the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel ap pearing for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Chief En gineer, PWD (Building) to verify the claim of the petitioner and if upon such ve rification it is found that any amount is due and payable for the works done, hi s name shall be enlisted in the register maintained by the department. The amoun t found as due and payable to the petitioner shall be paid to him as per his tur n. The verification part as well as the enlistment of the petitioner’s name in t he register shall be made within a period of 3 (three) months from today. The pa yment of the amount found to be due and payable, however, shall be made as per t urn of the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.