IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 26TH JUNE 2008 / 5TH ASHADHA 1930 Con. Case(C).No. 806 of 2008(S) ------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.14934/2007 Dated 11/05/2007 .................................................. PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ------------------------------- V.K.KUNHAMMED, S/O.PARYAYI, AGED 54 VALIYAKOYILLOTH THAZHEKUNI, P.O.KALLAI, NADAPURAM VIA VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: --------------------------------- SRI.K.Y.GEORGE, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY-CUM-REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, MALAPPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER, SMT. K.R. DEEPA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Cont. Case (C) No. 806 OF 2008 (S) = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 26th June 2008 J U D G M E N T The complaint is regarding the non-implementation of Annexure A1 judgment by settlement of timing. The learned Govt. Pleader submits, on instruction, that on 24.1.2008 timing conference was held and after hearing all parties timing has been settled. It is also stated that the decision has been communicated to the petitioner. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner complains that the decision has not been communicated so far. 2. If timing conference has been held and the timing has been settled there is no question of any violation of Annexure A1 judgment. However, if as stated by the petitioner, the decision has not been communicated, it is ordered that on the production of a copy of this judgment the respondent shall make available a copy of the proceedings of the timing conference held on 24.1.2008. Contempt is closed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-