IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 16TH MAGHA 1928 WP(C).No. 3198 of 2007(E) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------------- UDAYAKRISHNAN. K.P., KAPPITHAN PARAMBIL PALLILAMKARA, KALAMASSERY, KOCHI-683 104. BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR RESPONDENTS: -------------------- 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KOCHI-682 022, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. VICE CHANCELLOR, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KOCHI-682 022. 3. PRO-VICE CHANCELLOR, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KOCHI-682 022. 4. DR.R. SASIDHARAN, MEMBER SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR RECRUITMENT OF NON TEACHING STAFF, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KOCHI-682 022. 5. SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR RECRUITMENT OF NON TEACHING STAFF, REPRESENTED BY PRO-VICE CHANCELLOR, COCHIN UNIVERITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KOCHI-682 022. BY ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY SMT.N.SANTHA, SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WP.(C) No. 3198 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 5th day of February, 2007 JUDGMENT Heard counsel for the petitioner. Standing Counsel Sri. Abul Hassan and Sri. S.P.Aravindaksha Pillai counsel appearing for the fourth respondent. They submit that selection process scheduled on 2.2.2007 proceeded in the light of the interim order passed by this court. Counsel for petitioner submits that no further orders are necessary. Counsel for the petitioner does not press the second prayer as such. In such circumstances, I feel that the writ petition can be disposed of in the light of the interim order. I make it clear that I am not going into the personal allegations against the fourth respondent as such and I am not pronouncing on the allegations as such. I further make it clear that disposal of this writ petition as aforesaid is not taken to mean that this court is giving the seal of approval to the selection. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE) WPC 2 sb K.M.JOSEPH, JJ. - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A. No. OF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Dated this the day of February, 2006.