1 wp-8791-10.doc pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8791 OF 2010 Bapu Ashok Gare ...Petitioner Versus Karmaveer Kakasaheb Wagh Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and anr. ...Respondents Mr. B. S. Nayak i/by Mr. Sagar Kasar for petitioner. Mr. S.M. Sabrad for respondent no.1. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. August 16, 2011. P.C. Heard. The petitioner was an employee under the respondent no.1 – sugar factory, which is a cooperative sugar factory. The petitioner prays 2 wp-8791-10.doc for a writ for reinstatement in service by setting aside the order of termination, oral or in writing. The petitioner’s remedy will be either under the BIR Act or the MRTU & PULP Act before the Labour Court. We are satisfied that the petitioner ought to be relegated to an alternative and equally efficacious remedy of approaching the Labour Court. Hence, the petition is disposed with liberty to approach the Labour Court. (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)