IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 6TH JUNE 2011 / 16TH JYAISHTA 1933 WP(C).No. 8287 of 2011(I) -------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- SHANAVAS, S/O. KARUNAKARAN, KANJIRATHUMMOOTTIL VILAYIL VEEDU, KADAMPANAD NORTH P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- 1. THE PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., HEAD OFFICE, PATHANAMTHITTA, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, PIN-689 645. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, KADAMPANAD, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 645. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs W.P.(C). NO. 8287/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE LOAN PASSBOOK OF THE PETITIONER. P2: COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BYD THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER ADV. REMYA L. DATED 10/01/2011. P3: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 10/03/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. svs C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. ------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.8287 of 2011 ------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of June, 2011. J U D G M E N T Considering the effective statutory remedy provided under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act), this Court was not inclined to entertain this writ petition. However, on the basis of persuasive submissions made, dispossession of the petitioner from the property was stayed subject to condition of the petitioner remitting a sum of Rs.75,000/- within two weeks from 17.3.2011. Subsequently, on the basis of an application filed by the petitioner, the time stipulated for payment was extended till 20.4.2011, subject to condition insisting payment of a further sum of Rs.75,000/- on or before 25.5.2011. 2. It is conceded that the petitioner has not remitted any amounts. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions from the petitioner. 2 W.P.(C).No.8287 of 2011 3. Under the above mentioned circumstances, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition any further. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, Judge ami/