IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.964 of 2011 (Arising out of C.W.J.C. No. 10902 of 2005) 1. Hari Nandan Singh @ Hari Nandan Singh Yadav, S/O Late Sahdeo Singh R/O Vill.-Nawadih, P.O.-Rophatha, P.S.-Nokha, Distt.-Rohtas. 2. Bishwanath Singh S/O Late Sahdeo Singh R/ O Vill.-Nawadih, P.O.-Rophatha, P.S.-Nokha, Distt.-Rohtas…………………………………………….Appellants. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, Patna. 3. Additional Collector, Rohtas. 4. Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sasaram (Rohtas). 5. Sheoji Singh, S/o Sri Raj Nath Singh R/O Vill.-Baligaon, P.O.-Jobra, P.S.- Nokha, Distt.-Rohtas. (purchaser/writ petitioner) 6. Sidh Nath Singh, son of Late Sahdeo Singh, resident of village-Nawadih, P.O.- Rophatha, P.S.-Nokha, District Rohtas, A/P residing at Mohalla-Sidhnathpuri, P.O.-Dalmia Nagar, P.S.-Dehri, District-Rohtas (Vendor/Respondent 3rd set in writ application)……………………………………………………..Respondents. For the appellant : Mr. T.N. Mattin, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Yogendra Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, G.P.-15 ----------- 4. 18-10-2011 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the order under appeal whereby writ petition preferred by the purchaser Sheoji Singh has been allowed on 25.4.2011. It was submitted that plot No. 88 is not adjacent to plot No. 98 and hence the finding given by the Writ Court that purchaser is also adjacent to one of the vended lands is erroneous. We have looked into the materials particularly the revenue map which is available on the records of the writ petition and they support the findings recorded by the Writ Court. 2 We find no merit in this appeal. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Mkc/ (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Shivaji Pandey, J.)