IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2010 / 20TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 17983 of 2010(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- DR.GEETHA K.NAIR, W/O.DR.CHANDRA MOHAN, CONSULTANT (OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY), TALUK HEAD QUARTERS HOSPITAL, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT (UNDER ORDERS OF PLACEMENT OF GENERAL HOSPITAL, ERNAKULAM). RESIDING AT MALIECKAL HOUSE, MLA ROAD, VALIYAKAVALA, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVT., HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DR.PREMALATHA C.G., CONSULTANT (OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY) TALUK HEADQUARTERS HOSPITAL, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ARAVINDKUMAR BABU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ....................... W.P.(C).17983/2010 ....................... Dated this the 10th day of June, 2010 JUDGMENT As part of the implementation of the Rules regarding the constitution of Specialty Cadre, when placements and postings were issued, petitioner was transferred from Vaikom to Ernakulam. Petitioner submits that the 3rd respondent, being her junior, has been posted at Muvattupuzha which was the first option exercised by the petitioner and complaining of the above, and seeking accommodation at Muvattupuzha, petitioner has filed Ext.P4 before the 2nd respondent and seeks a direction for its consideration. 2. Having regard to the pendency of the aforesaid representation, without expressing anything on the merits of the claims raised by the petitioner, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P4 and pass orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within six weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. W.P.(C).17983/10 2 3. It is made clear that any order to be passed by the 2nd respondent on Ext.P4 shall only be with notice to the 3rd respondent also. 4. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs