IN THE HI©HCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURT MISC. APPEAL N0,_17 OF 2011 APPELLANT: ^laintiff) ^shish Agarwal, son of Shri Mansukh Agarwal, aged about 32 years, Caste-Agarwal, resident of Bathena Ward, bhamtari, Tehsil Dhamtari (CG). Vs RESPONGENTS: €^^} o \^ '•& / 'I. Purushottam Lal Sharma, son of Late Prabhati Lal Sharma, aged about 53 years, Caste- Jangir, resident of Stationpara, Dhamtari, Tehsil Dhamtari (C6) !< Mahendra Kumar Sharma, son of Shri Arjun Lal Sharma, resident of Stationpara, bhamtari, Tehsil Dhamtari (C6). k'State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, Raipur (C6) PEAL UNDER^RDER 43 RULE l(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1908 Being aggrieved by the order dated 08.02.2011 passed in Civil Suit .No.37-A/2009 (Ashish Agarwal Vs. .^f. Purushottam Lal STidrmaA another) by the learned'Distn'ct Judge, Raipur (copy enclosed her€w^has ANNEXURE A-l) 1KB K WfCfr^HIo!» -S-ST "i<|^|.r!^, ©flly'i.fl,f^IRTg? ^-....ty]A..u°-....l..'^../J.;.......^200 sn^Tv h-\ d^T 3H^^T Sh*i>ch A"-' •^ ^-'r, 3n"^i'<pR7 (ipi^^q) 'yRiraT'gftg'sii^i I'&ie Shri tice N.M Shri M.L-:"Saket, coun-se for the appeilant. Shri Sourabh Sharma, c^unsel for respondent No.1 Shri G.D. Wasv»ani,G.A.jforthe State/respondent Nu.3. LssmBd.CGUHScl SppcSf ofthis court to •"•ithdra'w this mi^c. appea!. He is permitted to do so. ACCOFQIHQiy, ?H8 uliSC. B. order ss to costs. ^iplicpfr'T ^Wcil' f ftizt TfsRZR "^i affim siit?! */»s ng for thc appeiiant seeks permissior sappcci ! Is dismlssed as v»ithdra'»»"n. No Sd/- I.K. Agarwal Judqe ~s ^ ^*sc; l^