£ ..^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLE SHRI SATISHICAGN!HQTRI,J, WMT PEITT!OPLfS)LNQ^l%2 of2007 PETITIONER ^ RESPONDENTS Pokhan Ram Sahu S/o Shri Bisru Ram Sahu aged about 43 years, Assistant Teacher, Presently posted at Govt. Primary School Rasni Block— Arang, Dist-Raipur (G.G.) VERSUS 1. Stote of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Dist-Raipur(C.G.) 2. Tfae District Education OfScer Raipur, District - Raipur(C.G.) 3. The Block Education Officer Arang, District - Raipur (C.G.) Present: Shri C.R.Sahu; Advocatefor thepetitioner. Shri Vinay Pandey, Panell-awyer for the State / respondente .1 to 3. QRDER (Passed on 2nd ofApril, 2007) 1. Learaed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the Stete/respondents jointly subiiiit that the fact and questionoflawiBvolvedmlliepresentwritpetitionaretiie same to that of in Vashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. 1 %j*^ :4 Mumcipal Gorporation, Durg and another {2006 (II) MPJR-CG 96}, which has been dispQsed of vide order dated 03.04.2006. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert tfae said submission. 2. In subsequent cases, i.e., Writ f>etition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gepesh Sumar Venna vs. The State Govt. of Chhattisgwh and aiwther) and other connected matters, decided by this Courton 15-12-2006, pursuant to the memo dated 28-1-1995, issued by tiie Secretary, Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal and fhe prospectus of Diploma in Education Examination, it was clarified that the nomenclature ofthe Basic Training Institute, i.e., B.T.I. has been changed and renamed as Diploma in Education, i.e., D.Ed. Accordmgly, the D.Ed. Certificate holders are also eovered by the decision in Writ Petition (S.) No.4130 of 2005 (Gopesh Kumar Verma vs. The State Govt of Chkattisgark <mdanother) (Supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case ofYashwantKumar Bharadwaj Vs. Mumcipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), subject to verification of the fact as to whether the petitioner hasacquired D.Ed. Examination Certificate on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advailce mcrements or not. No order as to costs. Sd/-. . SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Amit