1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2855 OF 2006 IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.4318 OF 2005 PETITION NO.4318 OF 2005 PETITION NO.4318 OF 2005 The State of Maharashatra & Ors..Petitioners Vs. Smt. Vandana Vithoba Shrivardhankar..Respondent Shri D.A.Patil AGP for State Shri N.V. Bandiwadekar, for Respondent CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.ROSHAN MRS.ROSHAN MRS.ROSHAN S.DALVI, JJ. S.DALVI, JJ. S.DALVI, JJ. DATE: DATE: DATE: 28TH NOVEMBER,2006 28TH NOVEMBER,2006 28TH NOVEMBER,2006 P.C. . The State has approached this Court to vary para.3 of the order dated November 28, 2005 by submitting that they have been unable to trace the copy of the representation dated 10th October, 2004 in their records. 2. On behalf of the original petitioner learned Counsel seeks time. In our opinion it is not necessary to grant time as the petitioner has taken out contempt petition. In that contempt petition learned Single Judge has permitted the petitioner to make a fresh representation. That representation has been considered and disposed of. No prejudice, therefore, is occasioned to the petitioner. 2 3. Considering the statement made on behalf of the State that they are unable to trace out the representation in their records in paragraph 3 of the order dated 28th November, 2005 after the word "representation" add the words "if any". Registry to issue the certified copy of the order dated 28th November, 2005 after carrying out the said correction in the order. . With the above observation Civil Application disposed of. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (MRS.ROSHAN MRS.ROSHAN MRS.ROSHAN S.DALVI, J). S.DALVI, J). S.DALVI, J).