IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 7675 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 25, 2010 Bishan Singh …Petitioner Versus Darshan lal Ghai and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Jagram Singh Cooner, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 30.09.2010 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ambala City, thereby rejecting the objections filed by the judgment debtor in the execution. While dismissing the objections filed by the petitioner – judgment debtor, learned Executing Court has observed that in a suit for specific performance, C.R. No. 7675 of 2010 petitioner/judgment debtor was party. It is further observed by the learned Executing Court that since petitioner/judgment debtor was party in a Civil Suit, hence, he could have taken all the pleas before the Court hearing the suit and now, petitioner/judgment debtor cannot be permitted to raise the pleas during the execution which ought to have been taken in the suit. I agree with the learned Executing Court that all the pleas and defence, which ought to have been taken in a suit, but not taken therein cannot be taken in the subsequent suit or in execution arising out of that suit. In view of this, no interference is called for. Petition is dismissed. November 25, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2