FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3847 OF 2011 YADAV BHUJANGRAO GAVANE VERSUS THE SUPDT OF POLICE NANDED AND ANR ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Mr. Patil Hanmant V. APP for Respondent(s): Mr. D.R.Korde. ... CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. Dated: September 21, 2011 ... 1. Perused investigation papers, which were made available for the inspection purpose, as well as heard learned respective counsel for the parties, finally. 2. This is an application preferred by the applicant, seeking anticipatory bail, apprehending his arrest under Crime No.206/2010, registered at Mukhed Police Station, District Nanded for the offences punishable under sections 363, 366 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code. 3. It appears that offence has been registered on the basis of complaint lodged by the complainant namely Janabai w/o Venkatrao Mashel on 12.12.2010. It is alleged in the said complaint that at about 08.00 p.m. on 11.12.2010, the complainant’s daughter Anjali @ Kavita was enticed from the lawful guardianship of the complainant, by the applicant and FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders his father and other co-accused persons illegally, for committing forcible intercourse with her in collusion with each other and she was taken away from her residence by a Tata Sumo Jeep. It is apparent from the contents of the First Information Report that name of the applicant has been reflected in the First Information Report and specific role has been attributed to him during the occurrence of the incident that he in collusion with the other co-accused persons enticed minor girl of the complainant, aged about 16 years from the lawful guardianship of the complainant for committing forcible intercourse with her and fled away. Statements of the witnesses namely Parvatibai Mashel as well as Namdev Mashel, brother of the victim girl are in consonance with the said complaint. Pertinently, said victim girl has not been traced out so far. 4. Hence, considering the accusations made against the applicant and nature and gravity thereof and more particularly, since victim girl Anjali has not been traced out so far, custodial interrogation of the applicant is imperative for further progress in the investigation in proper perspective, and hence, present application deserves to be rejected. 5. In the result, present application lacks merits and hence stands dismissed and disposed of finally. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders 6. The above observations are the primafacie in nature, same may not be used in any other matter, being decided on merits. Present application stands disposed of finally ( SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. ) aaa/- ***