•'swss-awy^K ^ IN THE HZGH COURT 0"i? CHHATTZSGARH AT BZL'BSMJR 3 i2i£i;L.-SS..Z2£2N>^£.'-AL5l3:».^SL-.2cwj.. 5ETITIONER i Smt» £^>onem Bhosiya^ Wi fe of Sri Ghanshyam Bhosiya^ aged about 25 years^ Presidenfc ^ /\ J^^^^ ^ jQisharda Mahila Swa-Sahayta ,^ .y^y y Jg'aTOohNaila , Janjglr, Municipal nt'u . V^^-'^' ./ CounGil, Janjgir," Distt : ^K^y Janj'gir' - Champa" ( C. &. ~) l^ State of Chhattisgarh ^' fchrough fche Secretary^ Department of ?ood & CjLvil Supplies Consumer Profcection D.K.S, Bhavan, Raipur ( C.G.) y2» The Collector^ Janjgir <-. ChanpQ^ Disfcfc $ Janjgir - Chanpa ( C«G : ) 3, The Sub Divisional Officer^ ( Revenue ) 9 Janjgir ^ Distt $ Janjgxr - Champa ( C-G ) ,€<, The Food Officer^ Janjgir^ Distt $ Janjgir - Champa ( C.G. ) ^^-JW., ^iLI^E?-S±^££^-P2^iL^^^^^-^^^Z^^.»^-^^I^ISJ.l^. OF I1STDIA. XI-HC-22 3TT^?T^T RpTt^3TI^?T ^iw^f^r •i^. ^y / 3'^T ^TPTT^PT, ^TflF^Tre, f^TRTy 3T1^i M5l|cb ^^ ^n\^<' ^IN^IshNich<"""<<""t"""^ 200 a^ 3TI^T?^TW^fN 28.7.2005 ShriV.K. Pandey, counsell Shri Yashwanfc -Singh Thalt.:ur Heard. Learned counsel for the ^ the Pre^ldent of Jaishaixla Mali applled for allotment of fair p Counc.il, Nail" Janjgir; but tl-| appUoation of the present petitio{ are not eligible. He further 8ubi'fiits petitioner has niade a represen^ representation is not being dec^ respondent No.2 & 3 be dire<| petitioner, to which learned G<| obiection, Ho.vin^ heard leoi'ned oo\.i tl-ic facts and circurnstances ofl decide the representation n-iade froni fche da-te of receipt of this by" the petitioner, HGwever, if t^ that CQ^e, the petitit?neTt be allo peri.od of scven days and therc^.fter re.pre^enta.tion in acc^ordance wit) With the direction aforesa6d, Con-sequcntly, M. (W. )P. N| disposed of. Certified copy as per rules 4>I^Td41^ WRTf^* tezl' ^^1< ^3Tf^T3TI^T |for fche petitioner. ', Govfc. Advocate for the State. |etitioner ^ubmits that the petltioner being lila Swa-&aha\rata SaiTtooh;, Naila- Jai-ijgir ^IOG shops within the area of Municipal [e reBpondeiits without considering the ^.er allotted the shops to other per&ons who that being aggrieved by that action the l.ation to respondent Nos.2 & 3 but that lided till date, therefore, he subn-iits that 5ted .to decide the representation of the bvernnient Aclvocate Shri Thakur has no nsel for the parties aiid having ooneidered the case^ respondent No.2 is directed to :>y the petitioner within a period pf 30 days )rder after considering all the point^ raised hc Sa.id representatiQii i;§ not available^ iii ^ved fco file a fresh representation wifchiii a- ^.fter^ rcspondent No.2 to decide thc ^aid |h IBJW, 1, the petition -stand-s disposed of. 13.2693/05 and I.A, No.6230/05 also stand Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge ^v^ ^- -q6