IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9230 of 2010 KANHAI RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 12.5.2010. Heard. The allegation is that the petitioner who is the husband of the deceased and others of his family member after killing the deceased had thrown the dead body into river ganges. The postmortem report indicates that the lady had been strangulated to death and that part of evidence has been discussed by me while I was passing the order in Cr.Misc.Petition No.24975 of 2007. In that view of the matter, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is dismissed. On perusal of different orders passed by the learned trial Judge, it is apparently clear that charges were framed afresh after appearance of accused persons who had been summoned under Sections 319 of the Cr.P.C. on 31.7.2009 under Sections 498A, 304B and 201/34 of the Penal Code. The court believes that an alternative charge under Section 302/34 of the Penal Code ought to have been framed. The learned trial Judge shall consider the framing of the above charge against the accused persons. At any rate, the trial must be concluded in a period of one year and six months from the date of receipt of the copy of the present order. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )