~y INTHE M.P. STATE ADMINISTRATIVET ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. Applicant (1) IAL AT RAIPUR of1998 ^.^^lM (2) (3) ;\il 1 and Bhupendra Singh Thakur Aged about 29 years Son of Shri Lochan Singh Thakur Village Post - Semra, Block Kurud Tah. Dhamtari Distt. Raipur (M.P.) Kumari Rama Sahu Aged about 37 years D/o. Shri Jiwarakhan Lal Sahu Village - Paraswani, Post - Seonikala, Block - Kurud, Tah. Dhamtari Distt. Raipur (M.P.) Pila Kumar Sarwa Agedabout31 years Son of Shri Budhram Sarwa Resident ofVillage Post Sirri, Block - Kurud, Tah. Dhamtari Distt. Raipur (M.P.) Uttam Kumar Sahu Aged about 34 years Son ofShri Birbal Sahu Resident of Village Post - Kosmarra, Block - Kurud, Tah. Dhamtari, Distt. Raipur (M.R) Khamhan Lal Netam Aged about 34 years Son of Shri Punuram Netam Resident of Village Silghat, Post Semra, Block Kurud, Tah. .- '' Distt. Raipur (M.P.) to 5 applicants are Ex-Mansevi Up Sahayak Shikchhak, previously appointed on due selection eligibilities against the vacant post of Asstt. Teachers, under the Edn. Deptt. of (?ovt. of M.P.) (4) (5) VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS/ RESPONDENTS (1) StateofM.P. Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, BhopaKM.P.) (2) Commissioner of Public Instructions, Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt., DirectDrate of Public Instructions, (DPI Office), Near Chetak Bridge, Bhopal (M.P.) (3) DeputyDirector of Public Instructions Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt. Education Distt. Raipur, P.0. Pension Bada, Vallabh Naaar Raipur (M.P.) _2St^ iI-Iil.Ai.l,..J.,!;l-J"S».SBi m -2— (4) Block Education Officer Govt. of M.R, Education Deptt. P.0. Kurud. Tah. Dhamtari, Distt. Raipur (M.R\1 ,;Di cation under sectjon 19 of the AdministrativeTribunal Act 1985 (No.13 of 19851 read with Artictes .i.. •! 3. 21 & 311 of the Constitution_oLlndia. consideredwith Principles of Naturat and Social^lystiee, [IGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPUR I'tll S.B. : HON'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J, WRIT PETITION (S.) N0.2570 OF 2005 Petitioner Bhupendra Singh Thakur and others versus Respondents State ofM.P. and others Present : Mr. AlokNigam, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. i'lllll ESSSi ORDER ith (Passed on 7m ofSeptember, 2006) It is submitted that the facts and question of law involved in the present petition are same to that of in Ram Sahay Jha vs. State ofMadhya Pradesh and others (Original Application No. 15/1995). The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, by its judgment and order dated 16-2-1996, allowed the application of the petitioner therein. Leamed counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to approach fhe respondents/State for consideration and disposal of the petitioners' =S-°B^B|@CS ""'° • •. "<BR»«*^:;: Gopal case in terms ofthe order dated 16-2-1996 passed in the case of Roni Sahay Jha (Supra) by Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for fhe respondentei/State fairly agrees with the submissions made by leamed counsel for the petitioners. 3. Accordingly, the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation before the respondents - State Authorities for their decision on the representation in the light of the order dated 16-2-1996 passed in the case of Ram Sahay Jha (Supra), in accordance with law, on its own merit, within reasonable time. 4- With the above-stated liberty, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per mles. ^^^ s^^? [ffITT^B^^E^'rT^?