IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) T PETIT ON NO. 4/5553 2004 Paja/ya’rc/ w $$Kanu Singh/\son of Dhalendra $003 Singh, aged about 42 years, ‘\ occupation — Ad-hoc Teacher, (Presentty discontinued) Bharari, 'osMiddle (I School, resident of — lgl village Newra, Post Newra, P.S. Kota, Tah. Takhatpur, District ~ Bilaspur (Chhattlsgarh) VERSUS RESPONDENTS The State of Chhattisgarh, through : the Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) The Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchalnalay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) The’Collector, Bilaspur (CG) 4. The District Education Officer, Education Distt. BHaspur (Chhattisgarh) 5. The State of Madhya Pradesh the Secretary, through Department of Education, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ‘ ’ 01) PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As per the cause title. W sawizm E57 T'EFJW was: am! Ema; @296 arw WW (gaigaw) waw @fvga air’iii: W”! 4 i vuwmmm Emafwfrr? 1mm} “3i @Q‘? W ‘85 s%x%a arraQ‘: 18.01.2005: - Shri A.N.Bhakta, Iearned coun el for the petitioner. Shri Akhil Agrawal, Iéarned P. The instant petition has bee preferred by the petitioner with the prayer for reappointment as Assi tant Teacher as according to the petitioner he was appointed as Assi tant Teacher wide order 30.08.1993 for a period of one year. . for the Stateirespondents. Learned counsel for the pet ioner submits that he has tiled an application for amendment in the cau e—title of the petition. The same is allowed. The petitioner to amend the cause—title during the course of the day. Learned counsel for the petitioner approached MP. Adminis rative Tribunal for reappointment as s‘rAsst. Teacher. ln certain years order of reappointment have been passed by the Tribunal as well as by the Hig Court of M.P. in View of the various orders passed by different forums, t e erstwhile State of MP. issued a circular dated 28.08.1997 wherein it mentioned that those teachers who have completed two years probation successfully, their names should be forwarded for appointment. Learne counsel for the petitioner submits that for the present, the petitioner ay be given an opportunity to tile a ondent No. 2, the Director, Lok detailed representation before res Shikshan Sanchalnalay, D.K.S. Bhamjian, Raipur (C.G.)rfor the grievances ' i “J“ i ‘/..J GRPRJ ~FS/35LLvi 2/2000»*50.00U. 3a raw, W, WWW WW wrpqg%g/ay @200 wi‘m 743$ (Emu) mm ww wax x L ‘ mfm'a ‘%mm? sffcm § ak‘wr fwd m1: raised by the petitioner in this petit on who shaii consider it on its own merits in accordance withiaw. g § S i 3mm as: ’mm ‘azii swim yam To this learneci counsel for the espondents has no objection. Having considered the facts nd circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion furth r on the merits of the case, l am of the View that the ends of justice will e served if the petitioner is directed to make a detailed representation b fore the respondent No.2 raising his grievances along with a copy of this etition and this order within 15 days and on tiling of such representation, the respondents No. 2 shall decide the same on its own merits in accor ance with law as early as possible preferably within a period of three m nths from the date of receipt of such representation. The petitioner shall be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law i he is aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent on his representati n. With the aforesaid observation , this petition stands disposed of. Consequently, M.W.P.No. 515 32004 and I.A.No. 9744/2004 stand disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge M GRPKla~FSHSO~H12/2000 50,000. We 14p74