1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 395 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 24862 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant Original respondent VERSUS Yadav Kisan Sasane & ors. ...Respondents Original claimants ..... Smt. V.A.Shinde, A.G.P. for the applicant Respondent nos. 2, 3, 5 and 7 absent in spite of service C.A. dismissed against resp.nos. 1, 4 and 8 ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 8th December, 2009 PER COURT : 1 Perused. Heard learned A.G.P. for the applicant. 2 The applicant has preferred the present application for condonation of delay of 2850 days caused in filing the accompanying First Appeal, challenging the judgment and award dated 27.11.1998, passed by learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, 2 Ahmednagar in L.A.R. No. 105 of 1987. 3 On perusal of the averments in the present application and after considering the submissions advanced by learned A.G.P.,, it appears that the applicant has explained the reasons for delay caused in filing the accompanying First Appeal in para nos. 2 and 3 thereof satisfactorily. Moreover, it appears that the delay occurred in filing the accompanying First Appeal is not deliberate, willful or intentional and, therefore, same is required to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 In the result, present application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ thereof and delay of 2850 days caused in filing the accompanying First Appeal stands condoned. Accompanying First Appeal be registered and numbered accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) dbm/ca395.07