1 cri-wp-2727-10.doc pdp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2727 OF 2010 Mr. Vicky Suresh Kale ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents None for petitioner. Mr. A.S. Gadkari, APP for State. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D.SALVI, JJ. July 25, 2011. P.C. When this petition was called out on 3/5/2011, none was present for the petitioner and same was the case on the last date i.e. 11/7/2011. Today when the petition is called out, none appears for the petitioner. 2 cri-wp-2727-10.doc Mr. Gadkari, the learned APP, on the other hand, has placed before us the report he has received from the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ajmer City, Rajasthan and along with the same a copy of the statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. of Rekha D/o Chetan Sablania, respondent no.5, before the learned JMFC, Ajmer, has also been forwarded. We have perused the same. As per the said statement, she is staying in her parental home in Ajmer and she has not been confined to any illegal custody/detention by her parents or any other family membrs. She has also alleged that she was forcibly married to the petitioner at Mumbai. In any case, the remedy for the petitioner is to initiate appropriate proceedings against his wife either for restitution of conjugal rights or any other remedy that may be available before the Family Court. The petition is dismissed for non prosecution. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)