IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2536 of 2007 ASHOK KUMAR SINGH,son of Ganga Dayal Singh, resident of village-Sonahar, P.O.-Thanua, P.s. Sheosagar, District-Rohtas at Sasaram ……..Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Commissioner cum Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, New Secretariat, Patna-1 3. The District Magistrate Kaimur(Bhabhua) 4. The District Superintendent of Education cum Sub-Divisional Education Officer, Bhabhua 5. The Block Education Extension Officer, Kudra, Bhabhua 6. The Block Development Officer, Kudra, Bhabhua 7. The District Education Officer, Kaimur (Bhabhua) 8. The Reigstrar, Bhartiya Siksha Parishad, Uttar Pradesh, Bharat Bhawan, 2/268, Gomati Nagar, Vishwas Khand, Faizabad Road, Lucknow-227105 -----------Respondents 02 28.09.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties as with regard to the following grievance of the petitioner raised in this writ application. “Issuance of an appropriate writ/ writs/ order/ orders/direction/directions commanding the respondents that the petitioner is entitled for consideration for appointment as Block Teacher (Trained)/District Board Secondary or Higher Secondary Teacher (Trained) in the district of Kaimur (Bhabhua) on the basis of Bachelor of Education Programme (B.Ed.) Certificate from Bhartiya Shiksha Parishad, Uttar Pradesh.” this Court is of the opinion that the Principal 2 Secretary of the Human Resources Development Department should look into the certificate of the petitioner for examining his claim of being qualified for the post of Panchayat Sikshak inasmuch as the apprehension of the petitioner is it is the order of the Principal Secretary of the Human Resources Development Department dated 13th September,2006 (Annexure-A) which is coming in the way of the petitioner for his being selected and appointed on the post of Panchayat Sikshak. In that view of the matter this Court would direct the petitioner to file a compact self contained representation highlighting his grievance before the Principal Secretary of the Human Resources Development Department within a period of one months from today along with a copy of this order whereafter the said authority shall examine the same and pass his reasoned order in next three months. It goes without saying that if the petitioners’ qualification is held to be as per the requirement of the post and the Principal Secretary would pass a favourable order in favour of the petitioner, the competent appointing authority would once again reconsider his decision for appointing the petitioner and would appoint him if any person having secured lesser marks than him 3 has already been appointed. This Court, however, must note the submission learned counsel for the State who has pointed out that the Bhartiya Siksha Parishad, Uttar Pradesh from which the petitioner is said to be passed the Bachelor of Education Examination in the year 1994 is not recognized institution in the list of the institution issued by the Government of Bihar and therefore, this aspect will also be gone into by the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department while passing his order. With the aforesaid observation and direction and direction this writ application is disposed of. Amit ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)