1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 164 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4546 OF 2008 Prakash S/o Narsingrao Suradkar .. Applicant Versus 1. The Chief Executive Officer and others .. Respondents Shri Sudhir Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri V. R. Sonwalkar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Mrs. R. K. Ladda, A.G.P. for the Respondents No. 2 and 3. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 06TH NOVEMBER, 2009. ORAL ORDER [PER NARESH H. PATIL, J. ] : 1. Three points are raised by the learned counsel for the applicant on the ground of review. First is that, all the issues raised by the applicant are not considered. Second, though the respondent No. 2 did not file reply the matter was considered on merits. Third, the Assistant Government Pleader appeared for the State made a false statement. 2 2. We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant. Heard the counsel for the parties today. None of these grounds are sufficient and satisfactory to review the order passed by this Court on 08th July, 2009. The review petition is accordingly dismissed. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J. ] [ NARESH H. PATIL, J. ] bsb/Nov. 09