•\--.. y C^f-'v-a 2— X IN THE mGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BELASFUR W. PANO.J3''X"2^L2006 PETITIONER ^\^^ 4£^^:-'" ^..--C^\.^a.--" ...-" .^Av/< \v.'-" >»••' .A-rt<\\B y-vy'- •7';'-/ fSi-- Smt. Gauri Sahu, W/o.Budhram Sahu.^ aged about 48 years occupation- Ladies Health Visitor R/o Pamgarh Tah Pamgarh Dist. Janjgir-Champa . VERSUS \:! RESPONDENTS : 1. The StateofCUiattisgarh, Through the Secretary ^ ^ AV^ ^s^ t.0 ^- o. Department ofHealth & Welfare D.K.S. BhawanRaipur (C.G.) 2. Director Health Services. District-Raipur(C.G.) / 3. ChiefMedical Officer,--" Distt.-Janjgir-Champa(C.G.) 4. Collector Janjgir-Champa-'' Distaict Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CQNSTmjTION OF INDIA. (C-78 ^ll*l«l^'TT^ ^SvSf -ttioirt<4, y>Tn<H<i(», Rrtt'dyt 3-/C>^ .u.f^.^.^_ W^ 200 @ 3TI^?T CRcp (<tcll3cl<s) 3n^?iwf^ti<p asiTan^CTriilJifc ?^nsR^fi?r sn^sT PETITIONER Smt. about K/o Chacap ?auri Sahu, W/o Budhram Saliu aged f8 years, occupation Ladies Healtfa Visitoi P]amgarli Tah Pamgarh Dist. Jaajgir- &. Persus RBSPONDENTS 1. The Sccrctarl BbawanJ 2. Directorl 3. St^.te of ClLhattfsgarh, Tlirough the •', Dcpartmcnt of Hcalth & Wclfarc DKS Raipur (CG) [Heatth Services District-Raipur (CG) Officer, Distt. Jaajgir-Champa (CG) ChiefMeklical 4. CoUectod Chamual S.B Hon'bie 8hri Dhireadira 12.11.2008 Shri Samir Singh, couns< Shri YS Thakiir, Dy AG f< This petition is directed 18.9.2006, whereby the petitic|ner Health Center, Pacaearh to C^mi consequently, she has been rel^E Learaed counsel for the still working at Pamgarh aad Detitioner was ordered bv tliis Q On fhe otfaer hand, SIirj appearing for the State subin^ts itilillridl-l tf|tfriT^'(sL3 •(Kil'i-cit ^?3ri^T3n^?T Jaajgir-Chainpa District Janjgir- (CG) - W9tPetitioajy»dCTArticle$26/227 ofthe Coastitutioa oflndia WIsbra, J. U for the uetitioner. ^r the State. lagaiust the orders dated 7.7.2006 aad has been traasferred fixim Pnmary ^minuruty Health Center, Dabhra and •ved from Pamgarh. lietitioner subinits that the petitioner is |tatus-quo with respect to posting of fhe Foui-t vide order dated 12. 10.2006. Thakur, learaed Dy Advocate General its that siace fhe order of trausfer of ^TBI'^Kilrt^, t»Ti1'«<l<»,(elrtlt-iy . ^/^^A/^ . ?T? V3 6 *1Hril^'n^ ................................/.... ^200 3IT^9T 1q^P (llclijcl<Si) aii^nqiifertq? nsn 3ii^?T(R*rtiR ?T?IT8R ^ritel 3[T^ST ^- penljioner Annexure P/1 has not been) years of its passiiig, the Stat^ wifh libertv to fhe respect to posting of the In view of above subrali fhe uistaat petition is allowe(| P/4 are set aside. However,] to pass appropriate oiider ^ under admduistrative exigencl iiven effect to even after inore tliau two has no objection if fhe petition is aBowed State/re^poadents to pass appropriate order wifh under adinhiistrative exigency. issions of leamed counsel for the parti.es, '.. Iiapugned orders ofAnnexures P/laud tlie State/resDondents shaU be at Uberty |?ifll respect to posting of ftie petitioner Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge <M^frt41-f *ll*lriT*fls'<l •((ull^lt ^sif^Taii^ST