1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY C IVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 118 OF 2010 IN REVIEW PETITION NO. 39 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5454 OF 2009 Tanaji Mahadev Chougule .. Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents. Mr. N.V. Bandiwadekar for the Applicant. Mr. C.J. Sawant with Mr. Vishal Ghosalkar for Respondent No.5. CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A. A. SAYED , JJ. DATED : 8TH JULY, 2010. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. In effect the relief as claimed is inviting us to review the order passed on Review Petition by the earlier Bench on 22nd March, 2010. That is impermissible. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that in that case the applicant be permitted to withdraw the review petition itself, which has already been disposed of vide order dated 22nd March, 2010. In the first place, that is not the relief in the present application. Besides, the review petition having been decided on merits, we do not think it appropriate to allow the petitioner to 2 withdraw the review petition at this stage. Application is rejected. (A.A.SAYED,J.) (A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)