IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32663 of 2010 RAJNISH BIND @ RAJNISH BINDU @ RAJNISH KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioner is husband of the complainant and it is alleged that he alongwith other accused persons used to torture her on account of non-fulfillment of illegal demand. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he was kidnapped by family members of the complainant for the purpose of marriage but getting chance, he eluded from the clutches of the family members of the complainant and filed complaint case bearing Complaint Case No. 3 of 2010 in which cognizance has been taken by the court on 21.01.2010 for the offence under sections 147, 365 and 379 of the IPC. He also drew my attention towards Annexure-3 and submitted that the complainant has already solemnized her marriage with one, Chandan Chauhan. Though there is some allegation in the complaint petition but considering the above-said peculiar situation, particularly, this aspect of the matter that the petitioner has denied his marriage with the complainant, I think it proper to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed. In the 2 event of arrest or surrender before the court of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Lakhiksarai within 30 days from the date of receipt of the order, the petitioner, namely, Rajmnish Bind @ Rajnish Bindu @ Rajnish Kumar shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 686 C of 2009 subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)