IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (DB) No.1177 of 2011 Arvind Kumar Yadav, Son of Late Upendra Yadav, resident of Village- Ramnagar, Police Station- Ghailarh, District- Madhepura……Appellant. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Rajiv Ranjan, Son of Yogendra Narain Mandal. 3. Lal Bahadur Yadav, Son of Amitabh Sudhansu. 4. Ram Raghaw Kumar, Son of Amitabh Sudhansu. All residents of Village-Ratanpura, Police Station.-Ghailarh, District- Madhepura………………………………………………..Respondents. 2. 15.12.2011. Heard learned counsels for the appellant and the respondents. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 07.09.2011 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge/F.T.C. III, Madhepura, in S.Tr. No. 90 of 2003 whereby the learned trial court has acquitted the respondent nos. 2 to 4. It appears that the respondent nos. 2 to 4 were put on trial for charges under Sections 307/34 of the I.P.C and 27 of the Arms Act but injured witnesses P. Ws. 2 and 9 have not supported the prosecution case and have been declared hostile. Other witnesses who have supported the prosecution case their evidences are not specific to prove the charge. 2 Considering the aforesaid facts, we find no perversity in the impugned judgment, the appeal is dismissed. U. K. (Shyam Kishore Sharma,J) ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)