IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 15TH MARCH 2007 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1928 RP.No. 269 of 2007(E) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.546/2004 Dated 01/03/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS IN THE WRITPETITION ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPREESNTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD. 4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHERPULACHERRY. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW RESPONDENT: APPELLANT IN THE WRIT PETITION ------------------------------------------- SIVADAS V., MANAGER A.L.P.SCHOOL, THEKKEMMURY P.O. KARALMANNA VIA. PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 15/03/2007, ALONG WITH RP NO. 277 OF 2007 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.KOSHY & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. ------------------------------------- R.P.Nos.269 & 277 OF 2007 and C.M.Appl.Nos.125 & 129 of 2007 ------------------------------------- Dated 15th March, 2007 ORDER Koshy,J . These review petitions are filed to review the common judgment in W.A.Nos.545 & 546 of 2004. We have noticed that two schools were upgraded on the basis of Ext.P5 and there is no basis for discriminating some applicants who filed application at the relevant time. In any event, passing of a subsequent Government Order is not a ground for reviewing the judgment. We are of the opinion that a review petition cannot be equated to an appeal or a petition for rehearing of the matter. No grounds for review are made out. It is submitted by the review petitioner that Government has already filed a Special Leave Petition and the matter is pending in the Supreme Court. Since no grounds are made out, these review petitions are liable to be dismissed. 2. These review petitions are filed with a delay of 246 days. Absolutely no valid reasons are stated for condoning the delay in filing the review petitions, that too R.P.Nos.269 & 277 of 2007 2 after filing the S.L.P. The delay condonation petitions are liable to be dismissed. Hence, both the delay condonation petitions and review petitions are dismissed. J.B.KOSHY JUDGE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE tks