1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2587 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 2587 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 2587 OF 2008 Dena Bank ... Petitioner Dena Bank ... Petitioner Dena Bank ... Petitioner Vs. Vs. Vs. M/s. L.Natarlal & Co. & Ors. ... Respondents M/s. L.Natarlal & Co. & Ors. ... Respondents M/s. L.Natarlal & Co. & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.V.K.Tiwari i/b Mr.V.K.Tiwari i/b Mr.V.K.Tiwari i/b. M.V.Kini & Co. for the petitioner. M.V.Kini & Co. for the petitioner. M.V.Kini & Co. for the petitioner. Mr. G.T.Kukreja i/b. Mr. D.H.Shah for the respondents. Mr. G.T.Kukreja i/b. Mr. D.H.Shah for the respondents. Mr. G.T.Kukreja i/b. Mr. D.H.Shah for the respondents. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. DATED: 13TH MARCH, 2009. DATED: 13TH MARCH, 2009. DATED: 13TH MARCH, 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. It is brought to our notice that the matter is 1. It is brought to our notice that the matter is 1. It is brought to our notice that the matter is fixed before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Mumbai on 16th fixed before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Mumbai on 16th fixed before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Mumbai on 16th March, 2009. We direct the Tribunal to hear the matter March, 2009. We direct the Tribunal to hear the matter March, 2009. We direct the Tribunal to hear the matter on that day and pecide the Application finally on that day and pecide the Application finally on that day and pecide the Application finally expeditiously and, in any case, not later than six weeks expeditiously and, in any case, not later than six weeks expeditiously and, in any case, not later than six weeks 2 from that date. from that date. from that date. 2. In view of this order, this petition does not 2. In view of this order, this petition does not 2. In view of this order, this petition does not call for any interference. Hence, the petition is call for any interference. Hence, the petition is call for any interference. Hence, the petition is disposed of. disposed of. disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J.