IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15894 of 2010 MEGHAN MAHTO @ MEGHANA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, Advocate For the State: Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ----------- 2 28.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This application has been filed for modification of order dated 18.03.2010 passed by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 42178 of 2009, whereby the petitioner was granted bail with condition that one of the bailors must be his father. However, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that his father had died earlier than the filing of the previous Cr. Misc. No. 42178 of 2009, but, inadvertently, such fact could not be described in the earlier petition, therefore, it is submitted that any other person may be directed to be accepted as one of the bailors of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State raises no objection in this regard. Let the order dated 18.03.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42178 of 2009 be modified to the extent that one of the bailors must be close relative or family member of the 2 petitioner, who shall state on affidavit before the court concerned regarding his relationship, giving complete genealogy. This application is, accordingly, allowed. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through fax, if the petitioner deposits the requisite cost for the same. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)