CR NO.3703 OF 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CR NO.3703 OF 2010 DECIDED ON- 1.12.2010 Amarjit Kaur and another ……PETITIONERS Versus Mohinder Singh and another ……RESPONDENTS Coram HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K.Singla, Advocate for the respondents. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J(Oral) This revision petition is against the order passed by the learned Courts below on an application filed under Order 39 rules 1 and 2 readwith Section 151 C.P.C by which parties were directed to maintain status quo and the first appellate Court had also directed not to alienate the suit property. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the order of status quo is not clear and the learned courts below have committed an error in restraining the petitioner from alienating his land. It is submitted that admittedly, the petitioner is co-sharer in the suit property and has a right to alienate his property in any manner. On the contrary, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that he has no objection if CR NO.3703 OF 2010 2 the petitioner is allowed to alienate his property but he has a serious objection if the petitioner alienates a specific khasra number. He submits that petitioner may alienate his share but not a specific khasra number nor he should be allowed to raise construction on any khasra number till the property is joint and not partitioned. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no objection if an order is passed with regard to his right to alienate the suit property but he would only sell his share in the property and would not sell any specific khasra number nor would raise any construction on any specific khasra number till the property is partitioned in accordance with law. In view thereof, the present revision petition is disposed of while modifying the order passed by the Courts below that the petitioner may alienate his share in the suit property but he would not alienate any specific khasra number nor would raise any construction on any part of the suit property till its partitioned in accordance with law. 1.12.2010 ( RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) mamta JUDGE