IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 16TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 24547 of 2011(P) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. MOHITH.K.G., KIZHAKKUMURY HOUSE, PUDUKKAD PO, PIN - 680 301, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. SONA SAJAN.K., ANITHA NIVAS, MADAMPY LANE, POOTHOLE, THRISSUR - 680 304. 3. SREEJITH C.G., CHELATT HOUSE, PUTHANPALLY PO, MAMMIYOOR, THRISSUR - 680 103. 4. ANEESH.R., PONNETH HOUSE, THOTTIPPAL PO., PIN - 680 310, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 5. JISHNU J.ABHILASH, “ABHILASH”, KANIMANGALAM, PIN - 680 027. THRISSUR DISTRICT. 6. JITHIN CHACKO, KUNDUKULANGARA HOUSE, MANAKULANGARA PO, KODAKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 7. STEFFY ANTONY, MANJILA HOUSE, ANSTO ROAD, EAST FORT PO, THRISSUR - 680 005. 8. JASEENA V.A., VAKKAYIL PAYAKKAT HOUSE, KALOOR VADAKKEKAD (PO), THRISSUR - 679 572. 9. LINTO P.S., PALAYOOR HOUSE, PAZHIYOTTUMURY, KADANGODE PO, PIN - 680 584, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON, SMT.MEERA V.MENON, SRI.MAHESH V.MENON. Kss ..2/- ...2... WPC.NO.24547/2011 P RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, PAREEKSHA BHAVAN, TENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 001. 2. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, TENJIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 673 001. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss WPC.NO.24547/2011 P APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF APPLICATION RE-VALUATION FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DTD. 25/08/2011. P1(A): COPY OF APPLICATION RE-VALUATION FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DTD.20/08/2011. P1(B): COPY OF APPLICATION RE-VALUATION FILED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER DTD.25/08/2011. P1(C): COPY OF APPLICATION RE-VALUATION FILED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER DTD.25/08/2011. P1(D): COPY OF APPLICATION RE-VALUATION FILED BY THE 5TH PETITIONER DTD.25/08/2011. P1(E):COPY OF APPLICATION RE-VALUATION FILED BY THE 6TH PETITIONER DTD.25/08/2011. P1(F): COPY OF APPLICATION RE-VALUATION FILED BY THE 7TH PETITIONER DTD.01/09/2011. P1(G): COPY OF APPLICATION RE-VALUATION FILED BY THE 8TH PETITIONER DTD.01/09/2011. P1(H): COPY OF APPLICATION RE-VALUATION FILED BY THE 9TH PETITIONER DTD.27/08/2011. P2: COPY OF CHALLAN REMITTED THE PRESCRIBED FEE IN JANASEVA KENDRAM, THRISSUR DTD. 24/08/2011. P2(A): COPY OF CHALLAN REMITTED THE PRESCRIBED FEE IN JANASEVA KENDRAM, THRISSUR DTD. 20/08/2011. P2(B): COPY OF CHALLAN REMITTED THE PRESCRIBED FEE IN JANASEVA KENDRAM, THRISSUR DTD. 24/08/2011. P2(C): COPY OF CHALLAN REMITTED THE PRESCRIBED FEE IN JANASEVA KENDRAM, THRISSUR DTD. 24/08/2011. P2(D): COPY OF CHALLAN REMITTED THE PRESCRIBED FEE IN JANASEVA KENDRAM, THRISSUR DTD. 20/08/2011. Kss ..2/- ..2... WPC.NO.24547/2011 P P2(E): COPY OF CHALLAN REMITTED THE PRESCRIBED FEE IN JANASEVA KENDRAM, THRISSUR DTD. 24/08/2011. P2(F): COPY OF CHALLAN REMITTED THE PRESCRIBED FEE IN JANASEVA KENDRAM, THRISSUR DTD. 01/09/2011. P2(G): COPY OF CHALLAN REMITTED THE PRESCRIBED FEE IN JANASEVA KENDRAM, THRISSUR DTD. 01/09/2011. P2(H): COPY OF CHALLAN REMITTED THE PRESCRIBED FEE IN JANASEVA KENDRAM, THRISSUR DTD. 27/08/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: N I L /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE Kss P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 24547 OF 2011 -------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of September, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioners underwent the B.Tech degree course in Electrical & Electronics Engineering from Vidya Academy of Science and Technology. They appeared for the 8th semester B.Tech degree examination in June, 2011. The results were published in the first week of August, 2011. The petitioners failed in various papers. They therefore submitted Exts.P1 to P1 (h) application seeking revaluation of their answer scripts in the said papers. The requisite fee was also paid. This writ petition is filed seeking expeditious revaluation of their answer scripts mainly on the ground that unless the revaluation is expeditiously conducted, the petitioners will be put to serious prejudice. 2. When this writ petition came up for hearing today, Sri. Santhosh Mathew, learned standing counsel appearing for the University of Calicut submitted that if the applications submitted by the petitioners for revaluation are in order and the requisite fee has been paid, the University will take steps to expeditiously revalue the petitioners' answer scripts and to communicate the WPC No.24547/2011 2 results to them. In such circumstances, I dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to take steps to have the petitioners' answer scripts described in Exts.P1 to P1(h) applications revalued and to communicate the results to them expeditiously and in any event within eight weeks from the date on which the petitioners produce a certified copy of this judgment before the Controller of Examinations, University of Calicut. P.N.RAVINDRAN, (JUDGE) vps