IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CGJ ‘ mIT PETITION NO. PETITIONER: $§N§§LE . V gEE‘m‘E Z» ”l ( Ma 300' 4 I 2—7 I /2005 / Sanjay kumar Gupta, , S/o Late Shri Sushil Kumar Gupta, aged about 21 years, R/o Imh'bhata, Bandhwapara Sarkanda , Bilaspur, Dismct Bilaspur (CG) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Depanment of Irrigation, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, (C.G.) / 2. The Superintendent Engineer Hasdev Bango Dam Division District Bilaspur, (C.G.) 3. The Collector District Bilaspur, RESPONDENTS: Bilaspur (C.G.) / 4. Sub Divisional Ofhcer Arpa Nahar Sub Division No.3 Bilaspur , District Bilaspur (C. G.) / 5. State of Madhya Pradesh 2" ‘ through the Secretary . General Administration 1 Department , Vallabh Bhawan, f Bhopal, (M.P.) /‘ 6. Union oflndia, Through the Secretary, i, Depaltment of Personnel & Training , 3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan , Khan Market New Delhi / 00'. 5 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUENCE OF WRIT N THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS PROHIBTION CERTIORARI, AND ANY OTHER WRITS, DIRECTIONS OR ORDERS. XI-HC'QZ 3mm wywbw9v§o217]/J L b N Q ‘ Wa mmw Efa i * *‘WhqwW Wig; , Nmt 2-1 2-2005 2 Petitioner by Shri Hwa& WKJWLWM/ Advocate Shri Vivek Sharma Panel Lawyer for the State ' Heard This case reiates to compassionae appointment consequent upon the death of an mployee serving in the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner categorically stated that in this case, the death of the employee has occurred on or after 141-1 997 and not earlier. it is further submitted that in batch of cases bearing WP. No.1 322/2002 involving the same question orders have been passed by this Court on 20/1 2/2005. He prays that similar orders may be passed in this case also. Learned counsel for the State doei, not dispute the above fact and state that the State of Chhattisgarh has taken a decision to consuder the oases of dependants of those employees who died on or after 1/1 1/1 997 strictly in accordance wrth the policy prevalent at ‘ th at time. in view of the submissions mace by learned counsel appearing for the parties, ithout expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, in the opinion of this Court ends of ustice wiii be sewed if a direction is give n to the State of Chhattisgarh and the authorities concerned to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in accordance with the policy prevalent at the time of death of the employee concerned, if the petttioner found eligible, appointment orders wiiibe issued as ea'ly as possible on or before 30‘" April, 2006f The petitioner is also directed to render due co-operation to the authorities. it is made clear that if any grievance still remains the petitioner may avail the remedy available under the law including fiiing of the petition before this Court . With the aforesaid observations, his petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Copy to the State counsel: who will be obliged to communicate the order to the respondents forcompiiance. éd/ “ *“‘ Fakhruddtn Judge Wye; k w \‘j