^ ^-f^^-'. -f^ -•'i' '•>,, ?< .It ^s^ (§7^ <3^ ^ K /^ f'lf'<.' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUg Writ Pctiti nrS)No. 1391 of 2008 Pstitionet 3. 4. 5. 8. 9. 10. 11 12. 13. Versus C3, r\^ospondents 1. Tilak Kumar Tswari, Aged 51 years, S/o Late Shri Shiv Prasad Tiwari, Govt. Middte Schoo!, Naya-Dhaba. Mycie Masih, ^ed 57 years, S/o Late Shri Yakub Masth, Govt. Primary Schoo!, Nandiya. rf Akbar Ram Deewangaon, Aged 51 years, S/o Shri Rikhiram Deewangaon, Govi. Primary Schoo! Muchey-Dhand, Chhuriya, ianshi Ram Ramteke, /^ed 53 years, S/o Late Shri Batsing Ramtake, Govt. Mjdte Schoo!, Sone-Sarar. Shri Moti Lai Banjare, Aged 52 years, S/b Late Shri Dhadiai Banjare, Govt. Mid'e Schoo!, Naya-Dhaba. Ratanram Verma, Aged 52 years, S/o Late Shrl Bahai Sing Verma, Govt. Midle School. Charbhata. iideshi Ram Verma, Aged 56 years, S/o Late Shri Ghamruram Verma, Go'/t. Primar/ School, Devdongar. Moh. Mobin Khan, Aged 56 years, S/o Late Shri Ishuf Khan, Govt. Primary School, Kode, Nawagaown. Punuram Desh'ahre, Aged S6 years, S./o Late Shri Shuk Lat Deshlahre, Govt. Middle School, Khutari. Baishskhuram Marai, Aged 55 years, S/o Late Shri Milap Ram Marai, Govt. Primary Schoo!, Markam-Tola. Bhagwat Singh Banafar, Aged 56 years, S/o Late Shri Kaniyaha Singh, Govt. Primary Schoo!, Tskam. Madan Lai Tiwari, Agea' 57 years, S/o Late Shri Shiv Prasad Tiwari, Govt. Mlddle Schooi, Maneri, Dongrgaon. Hansh Das Suryawani, Aged 51 years, S/o Late Sh" Narayan Prasad, Govt. Primary Schooi, Damabanjari. All Assistant Teacher, Distrlct Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. The State Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Through th® Secretary, Schoot Education Department ftflinistry, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) Director of Public Instructions, State of Chhattisgarh, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.) The DisSrict Education Officer, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) -^L.. /y ^ li^^^R-*. ^ I ^s^ 5 '•% ..^"'^ -^::.^,^^' ^ -2. WRiT PETiTOlN UNDER ARTICLE 22S OF THE CONSTITUTION OF JNDIA SingSe Bench : Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. Smt. Smitha Ghai, Panei La^vyerfor the respond&nts. Thakur ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 3rd day of March, 2008} The petitioners were appointed injtiaily, on a faed pay of Rs. 100/-. The petitioners were thereafter, granted reguiar pay scaie on compteSion of She probation period. The question of law invo!ved herein is, asto whether the petitioners are enfitled to reguiar pay scale w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from 3. the date of completion of probation period. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, as weit as learned counse! appearing for the respondents/State, joint!'/ submit that the facte and question of !av», invoived in the present writ petition, are the same asto •a+ nf in tjt' P fK\ Mn t'Wftnnn7 / I niinath Pata! '/c P.tata nf vl ill vV.j", ^th?^ i'Tjy. ^\A?^?/£Wf ^ i-yMiCtlii r'cti^i v^, ^?i.taic ui Chhattisgarh and othere), whlch was disposed of vide order dated 27.6.2007. isij'Mttt ^\f 'frl^/ii ^sl^.ft»^^''i_^•^/^'frrf&j^ ?»*il^*w*t^'ki"*ii VicW Vi i.U^ cik;yvi£-£?i,di,^ made by iearned counsel appearing for the parties, the v.'rit petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e. petitioner is entitied for rsguiar pay scais w.e.f. the date of initial appointment, subject to verification of the facts. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge