Crl. Misc. No.M-28560 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Date of Decision: November 29, 2010 1. Crl. Misc. No. M-28560 of 2010 Bhupender @ Bhupi …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …..Respondent 2. Crl. Misc. No. M-32517 of 2010 Amarjit @ Meeta …..Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Ms. Sharmila Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner in Crl. Misc. No. M-28560 of 2010. Mr.H.P.S. Aulakh, Advocate for the petitioner in Crl. Misc. No. M-32517 of 2010. Mr. Amit Rana, DAG, Haryana. Crl. Misc. No.M-28560 of 2010 [2] -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) This order will dispose of two petitions bearing Crl. Misc. No.M-28560 and M-32517 of 2010, for grant of bail pending trial, in a case of dacoity having snatched away a Truck on pistol point and snatched a sum of Rs.10000/- besides a mobile phone. It is an admitted fact that the petitioners were arrested in a case dated May 4, 2010 in FIR No.102 registered at Police Station Shivaji Colony, Rohtak on the allegation that they were found making a plan to snatch and rob the Truck. After the petitioners having been arrested in the said case, they had allegedly made a confessional statement to the police to the effect that they have committed the offence of dacoity regarding which an FIR No.117 dated April 22, 2010 stood recorded with Police Station Urban Estate, Rohtak. The only evidence which has been gathered against the petitioners is that a sum of Rs.20000/- was recovered from each of the accused on the basis of the statements made by them under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. The identity of the petitioners is not described in FIR No.102. All the witnesses in the present case are official witnesses and chances of tampering with the evidence are remote. Recoveries having already been effected, the petitioners can be granted the concession of bail. Petitioners have been in custody for the last 7 months. Petitions are allowed. Petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds/ surety bonds for a sum of Rs.50000/- each with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Crl. Misc. No.M-28560 of 2010 [3] Court, with an additional condition that they will not commit the similar offence of which they were accused of during the pendency of the trial. November 29, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE