IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40614 of 2009 PARMILA DEVI, HEMLATA KUMARI @ HEMA KUMARI, SAMLATA KUMARI, ROJI DEVI & AJIT PASWAN. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 7.1.2010. Heard. All the offences of the FIR except those under Sections 379 and 385 of the Penal Code being bailable, the court feels that it could be the best case to be handled by the C.J.M., Lakhisarai without any prejudice towards the petitioners for filing anticipatory bail petitions. It is contended that the allegations are also general and vague. The court believes that the C.J.M., Lakhisarai, (Surajgarha P.S.Case No.323 of 2009) shall never allow his jurisdiction to be sackled by mere insertion of any section which might have been shown as non-bailable or cognizable in the schedule of the Cr.P.C. This petition is disposed of with the above directions. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through fax at the cost of the petitioners. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )