IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3747 of 2008 MITHILESH DEVI D/o Late Indra Ballabh Das, Resident of Village & P.O. Sipaya P.S.- Bishwambharpur, District-Gopalganj Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR Through Secretary Department of Animal Husbandary Bihar at Patna. 2. The Director, Department of Animal Husbandary Bihar at Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj. 4. The Assistant Director, Minor Cattle Development Project Gopalganj, Department of Animal Husbandary. 5. The Manager, State Cattle Breeding Region Sipaya Farm Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj ----------- 2. 19.04.2011 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Taking into account that the petitioner is a married and deserted daughter of the deceased employee dying in harness, her appointment on compassionate ground is not permissible in terms of the category of dependants mentioned in the policy of the State Government contained in circular dated 5.10.1991. The possible plea as also sought to be advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that since unmarried daughter under the policy is eligible for appointment on compassionate ground and, therefore, a married but deserted daughter would also stand on the same footing has to be only noted for its being rejected. The policy is very clear that as 2 to who all amongst the dependant of deceased employee would be entitled for appointment on compassionate ground and in fact it is only the wife or husband, son, unmarried daughter and widow of pre deceased son who have been categorized in the Government policy as eligible dependant of the deceased employee entitled for consideration for appointment on compassionate ground. Once the petitioner does not fall in any of four category, it would be difficult for this Court to issue a direction for consideration of her case especially when the policy is also not under challenge. This application is wholly misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. Anand Kr. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)