IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19288 of 2010 DHARMENDRA KUMAR @ DHARMENDRA RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 27.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner being the brother-in-law is languishing in jail since 26.03.2010 in a case registered under Sections 302/201/34 of the I.P.C. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the marriage took place ten years ago and from the impugned order itself, it appears that the victim herself went to her parent’s house whereas contrary version has also been recorded during investigation. It is further submitted that last portion of the impugned order also reflects that there are only circumstantial evidences against the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that charge sheet has been submitted in the matter. Considering the fact that petitioner is the brother- in-law and there are only circumstantial evidences against the petitioner, let the petitioner namely Dharmendra Kumar @ Dharmendra Rai, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the 2 like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, patna in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 70 of 2008. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)