T ' '"<^^s'l;;?;c<?K;ssfai ;¥'l;S^SM4g^;;gjgis^S^^^t A^. ® .."-•"" fc^^^ 'M'tts'? c. ^' i^i!^—^ ^~- A^"" ^?'":,u^ SHE^ttlGH COURT 0V JUMCATURE ATBILASPUR (CHHATTISGARHt WRIT PETITION No. OT^ /2006 PBTITIONER Sundermati aged about 21 years, W/o Ram Prasad By Caste Kawar, BEC^ED^OPV ^^::;:-" "d D"u- CLERKto A. G. BUASI'UByg^guS RESPONDENTS / 1. The State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Department, Raipur. C.G. 2. The Collector, Janjgir (Champa) 3. Project Officer, Ekikkrat Bal Vikas Pariyojna, Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir Champa 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir Champa WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22$ AND227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA T XI-HC-22 3IR5iq5I fs^an^i H/- -SSI ^SPWvPf.WSFmS, •fsRiTHy ^r^^ 3(i^T^giw!;^?g 3.4- wm Shri Parag Kotecha, counsel f Shri A.S. Kaehhawaha, GovtJ no.1 to3. Heard. The present petitions bea| 646/2006 and 647/2008 have beerl Qra'er dated 22/12/2005 passed wherebythey have been removed Return has been filed by| Nos.645/2006 and 646/2006 and itii 647/2006. Aiongwith the return, 3173/2008 (Annex.R/4) issued by rd beenfiied. it is submitted by the State the matter and tiil the inquiry is M Programme ohiy has been taken awa In view of the above, iearned withdraw these petitions with eventuality arises. ' Accordingly, these petitions s the libert^ as prayed for. iber(y «bl<ifd4>-1'»I"RJT ^•SifiER or the petitioners. Advocate, for the State/respondents ing W.P.NOS.644/20Q6, 645/2006, filed by the petitioners against the |>y respondent no.3/Project Officer, the postof Aaganbadf Workers. respondente no.1 to 3. in W.P. aciopted in W.P. Nos.644/2006 and t;opy of the ^mended order dated ^spondent no.3/ Pro}ect Officer has colinsel that the inquiry is being neid in eld, the work of National Nutrition y from the petitioners. Held counsel for the petitioners wants to ^^\\^ft to file afresh in case 9<®b<^sm -«' and dfeposed of as withdrawnwith Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^^ng^