,««°Sia •iiiijy"^ - ^€/ 'fSSTn,?-'!':'^"'' ••^SSSSi-^' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIASPIJR PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ws WRIT PETmON fC) No. 5105 of200S S.J.Sindi Goutam Aged about 56 years S/o l^te Sliri Vijay Bahadur Singh Goutam R/o Baiswara House, Behind Dr. Dbillon Complex, Durg(C.G.) VERSUS 1. Regional Transport Authority, Raipur Region, Raipur(C.G.) 2. The Secretary, Regionsl Traisport Authority Raipur Region Raipur (C.G) WRTT PETITION L'NDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Asnihotri, J. Present: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate fbr the petitioner. Sfari Yashwant Smgh Thakur, Dq?uty Advocate General with Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 12ttl day of September, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits fhat the petitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this stage. However, the respondent -authorities may be directed to consider and decide his pending application dated 25.7.2008 (Annexure P/l) in accordance with law, on its own merits, as eispeditiously as possible. 2. Shri Thakur, ieamed Deputy Advocate General for the respondents submits that there is no reason asto why the representation ofthe petitioner, as stated above should not be considered expeditiously. Shri Thakur submits that the above-stated representation shall be eonsidered and decided by the concerned authority, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of one week from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. 3. In view ofthe clear statement made by leamed counsel appearins for the respondents, according to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothinsj:emams to be adjudicated. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. No order asto eosts. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihptri Judge ^7 llt