IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.57 OF 2010 WITH FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.58 OF 2010 Sandeep Sabarwal .... Appellant Vs. Sheetal Sabarwal .... Respondent Mrs. Mrunalini Deshmukh i/by Subhash Jadhav, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Haresh M. Jagtiani a/w Ms. Pooja Jalan, Sr. Advocate i/by Haresh Jagtiani & Associates for respondent. Coram : A.P. Deshpande & Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, JJ. Date : 3rd May, 2010 P.C. 1. Admit. (Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota,J) (A.P. Deshpande, J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.110 OF 2010 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.57 OF 2010 Sandeep Sabarwal .... Applicant Vs. Sheetal Sabarwal .... Respondent Mrs. Mrunalini Deshmukh i/by Subhash Jadhav, Advocate for applicant. Mr. Haresh M. Jagtiani a/w Ms. Pooja Jalan, Sr. Advocate i/by Haresh Jagtiani & Associates for respondent. Coram : A.P. Deshpande & Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, JJ. Date : 3rd May, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard the parties. 2. The appeal involves various arguable questions, which need serious consideration. The objections raised in the present appeal pertain to the very maintenability of the proceedings in India, so also the maintenability of the proceedings under the personal law of the parties. Prima facie we find that the parties had agreed to submit to the laws of U.A.E. In that view of the matter, we grant interim stay of the proceedings in Petition No.B-65 of 2009 and M.J. Petition 170 of 2009. We dispose of the applications without considering prayer clauses (b and c). We grant liberty to the appellant to move separate application, touching prayer clause(e). Hearing of the appeals is expedited. (Smt.R.P. SondurBaldota,J) (A.P. Deshpande, J.)