IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 23117 of 2011 Date of decision December 13, 2011 S. C. Rahlan ....... Petitioner Versus Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, New Delhi ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-4) is considered and appropriate orders be issued on the basis of the representation. 2. As ordered. 3. The respondent shall consider the representation (Annexure P-4) and take appropriate decision as per law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order and communicate the same to the petitioner. 4. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 13 , 2011 archana