THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3035 OF 2008 ORAL ORDER: ` Heard both sides. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 21.04.2008, passed by the III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, in I.A.No.1982 of 2006 in O.S.No.461 of 2002, wherein and whereby, the petition filed under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure by a third party seeking to implead him as sixth defendant in the suit was allowed. The petitioner is the first defendant and respondents 2 to 6 are the other defendants and the first respondent is the third party to the suit. The said suit is for partition. In such a case, the interest of the third party might have to be gone into by the trial Court depending upon the facts and circumstances of the case. That discretionary jurisdiction has already been exercised by the trial Court. Mere impleadment of the third party to the suit for partition does not confer any vested right on him. In other words, the rights of such a party will have to be decided by the trial Court after due adjudication by way of trial of the suit. I see no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the trial Court. The Civil Revision Petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA 16th July, 2010 dr