1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7845 OF 2009 WIH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2860 OF 2009 Gurukrupa Samajseva Mandal & Ors. ... Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharahtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. D.S.Mane, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. V.S.Masurkar, Govt. Pleader for the State. Mr. Kunal Cheema, Advocate, for the applicant in C.A. No.2860 of 2009. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 26th November, 2009. P.C. 1. In view of the order that we pass, notice to the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 is dispensed with. It is the grievance of the petitioners that they had transferred the School run by them in favour of respondent Nos. 4 and 5. There were several complaints filed, including by the teaching and non-teaching staff resulting into an enquiry and the report is submitted by the respondent No.3 to respondent No.2. 2. It is the case of the petitioners that instead of cancelling the 2 recogntion of the School itself, the petitioners should be permitted once again to take over the management of the School. We do not propose to go into the controversy, but leave it to the respondent No.2, after hearing the petitioner, the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and the teaching and non-teaching staff and, if need be, parents of the students who may be desired to be heard, to take a decision so that interest of the students as also the teaching and non-teaching staff is not affected. If any party is aggrieved by the decision, it will be open to him to take steps which he may be entitled under the law. The entire action to be completed within three months from today. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)