upa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.376 OF 2005 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.376 OF 2005 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.376 OF 2005 WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7154 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7154 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.7154 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.376 OF 2005 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.376 OF 2005 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.376 OF 2005 Ramnik Nansi Gala ).. Applicant Versus Manoj Moorji Satra and others ).. Respondents Smt.S.Kaushik for the Applicant. Mr.H.E.Mooman for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. Smt.V.R.Bhosale, Additional Public Prosecutor, for Respondent No.5. CORAM : V.G.PALSHIKAR, Acg.C.J. & CORAM : V.G.PALSHIKAR, Acg.C.J. & CORAM : V.G.PALSHIKAR, Acg.C.J. & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED : 8TH SEPTEMBER 2006 DATED : 8TH SEPTEMBER 2006 DATED : 8TH SEPTEMBER 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . In view of the fact that the substantive Appeal filed by the State against the acquittal is admitted, the Application for condonation of delay in filing the Criminal Revision Application and the Revision Criminal Application need not be considered. Both, the application for condonation of delay and the Revision Criminal Application dismissed.