IN THE HoN’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIsGARH AT BILASPHR WRET PETETION (S) No. § 7% OF 2009 (s34 :— L/Smt. Anjvani Singh w/o Shri D.K. Singh, aged about 47 years, Occupation Service, posted as U.D.T. at Kanya Ashram — Dhanora, Tahsi 85 District Bijapur (C.G.). R/o village —& Post Jevra, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.). Smt. Ahilya Chapdi W/o Shri Mahesh Kumar Chapdi, aged about 35 years, Occupation Service, posted as L.D.T. at Kanya Ashram — Dhanora, Tahsil 8r, District Bijapur (C.G.), . R/o village 85 Post: Dhanora, Tahsil and District Bijapur (C.G.) VERSUS /__ PETITEGNERS RESPONDENTS :— 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. ”Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare and Development, Raipur (C.G.). 3. Collector, District Collectorate, Bijapur District Bijapur (C.G.). 4. The Secretary, Mata Rukhmani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tahsil 8r, District Jagdalpur (C. G.). Formal Party WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 l HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIGN (S) No. 5779 of2009 WRIT PETETION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTEON OF INDEA SB: Hsn’ble Shri Sa$ish K. Agnihmri. J. Presem: Shri Amiya Kant Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners, Shri Y.S.Thakur, Degauty Government Advecate for the State. ORBER ORAL) (PaSsed on 08’ day of October, 2009) Hear leamed counsel for the pames. d . Learned counsel appearing for ihe petitioners submits that the instant petition is squarely covered by the decisioa of this Court rendered in Stilt. ALalZ v. State 0f Chham‘sgarh 62 Others}, thus the petitioners may be permitteo to make a representation to decide their case iri the light of atoi‘estated decision. subiect to verification asto whether the respondent No. 4-Institute is a Government Aided school and the petitioners are the teacher Within the sarictioned strength. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the State/respondents 1 to 3 submits that in the eveht, the petitioners make a representation, the same will he consieered x and decided, in accordance with law: Within a period of four weeks from the date ofreceipt ofthe representation. 3. Ih View of foregoing, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the Writ petition is diSposed of. Amit 12007 (1) BLJ 265 PETETEONERS : Sim. Anjani Singh & another. VERSUS RESPON§ENTS : State of Chhaitisgarh & Others.