IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No 195 of 1992 in SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATIONNo 1319 of 1992 Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : YES to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- VARTAJ CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PVTLTD Versus JOINT COMMISSIONER -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR DHAVAL NANAVATI for MRS DK NANAVATI for Appellants MS KATHA GAJJAR for Respondent No. 1, 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT and MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT Date of decision: 08/03/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT) Learned AGP Ms. Katha Gajjar places on record a letter of the appellant-original petitioner dated 5.3.2001 and a copy of the order of the respondent authority, and states that the licence got cancelled and therefore the appeal has become infructuous. In view of the aforesaid statement, the documents produced on record, and the nature of relief in the main petition, we find substance in the said contention. Therefore, this appeal shall stand disposed of as having become infructuous without any order as to costs. [J.N. BHATT J.] [Y.B. BHATT J.] *ar*