IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13331 of 2011 Mahadeo Manjhi Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 04/ 22.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Although petitioner is in jail custody since 20.6.2010 in a case registered under sections 395 and 397 of the IPC and in course of investigation one witness has identified him in test identification parade but the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was neighbour of the aforesaid witness and there was some dispute between the petitioner and the aforesaid witness on the point of wages and that is the reason petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. I am not at all convinced with the submission. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Pupari P.S. Case no. 98/2010 pending in the court of SDJM, Pupari at Sitamarhi stands rejected, at least, at this stage. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)