1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 194 OF 2011 (Ramesh @ Sandeep Mandiram Naitam vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri R.M. Daruwala Advocate (appointed) for the petitioner. Shri T.A. Mirza, APP for the respondents. ….. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & M.L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. APRIL 20, 2011. Heard Shri Daruwala, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Mirza, learned APP for the respondents. The case of the petitioner is that he was involved in a number of cases. Every-time he was acquitted and released from jail, the police involved him in some other case and took him in custody. The petitioner has preferred this petition to know how many cases are pending against him and if there are any other cases pending against him, he may be arrested in those cases also and trial may be disposed of expeditiously. As the cases pertain to Purada and Gyarapatti Police Station, the Superintendent of Police, Gadchiroli, was directed to file an affidavit stating therein whether 2 any other offence or offences are registered against the petitioner in any of the Police Station in the district of Gadchiroli, in which the petitioner has not been arrested so far. Pursuant to the directions, the Superintendent of Police has filed an affidavit wherein it is stated that in 5 crimes he is yet to be arrested because in his absence the charge-sheets were filed under Section 299 of Criminal Procedure Code. The cases in which the petitioner has not been arrested so far are CR Nos. 54 of 2007, 55 of 2005, 57 of 2007 and 73 of 2007 of Dhanora Police Station and CR No. 58 of 2005 of Purada Police Station. In the affidavit, it is further stated that directions have been given to the concerned Police Stations to take steps to produce the petitioner before the Court by preparing additional charge sheet in these five cases. The statement is accepted. Looking to the fact that the petitioner is in prison since some time, after his formal arrest in the above mentioned 5 cases, the trial in said cases be expedited. Petition is disposed of with above directions. The advocate appointed for the petitioner be paid fees as per rules. Office to communicate this order to the petitioner, who is in Central Prison, Nagpur. JUDGE JUDGE 3 *GS.