IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD MARCH 2011 / 2ND CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 17657 of 2010(Q) -------------------------- PETITIONER:- ------------------ BEENA PATHROSE,AGED 45 YEARS, W/O.LATE PATHROSE, RESIDING AT KALATHUPRAMBIL VEETTIL,MANARCADU VILLAGE, MALAMKARA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN SRI.R.REJI SMT.THARA THAMBAN SRI.B.BIPIN RESPONDENTS:- --------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ,KOTTAYAM. 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VAIKOM,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUMARAKAM POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 5. VARGHESE MATHEW,AGED 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT IDAYIDITHEKKETHIL VEETIL, ARIPARAMBUKAR, MANARGADU VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 6. PHILIP, AGED 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT MARANGATULAYAKALLUTHOTHIYIL VEETIL, AYARKUNNAM VILLAGE & P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.DILIP S. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 17657 of 2010(Q) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- P1: COPY OF THE CMP.NO.995/2010 ON THE FILE OF JFCM-III, KOTTAYAM. P2: COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.169/2010 OF VAIKOM POLICE STATION. P3: COPY OF THE FACTUAL REPORT DTD.4.5.2010. P4: COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.169/2010. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL. ( TRUE COPY ) P.A. TO JUDGE. Kvs/- Bhabani Prasad Ray, J. ==================================== W.P.(C)No.17657 of 2010 ==================================== Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2011. JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. The brief facts of the case is that the petitioner, who is the wife of late Pathrose filed an application C.M.P.995/10 before the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-III, Kottayam and under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. the learned Magistrate directed to register a case and investigate the same and accordingly the case was registered as Crime No.169 of 2010 under Sections 201, 203, 279 and 304-A read with Section 34 I.P.C. After holding an enquiry, the police came to the conclusion that there was no negligence on the part of the accused persons and accordingly final report was filed. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will file protest petition before the learned Magistrate. If such petition is filed within four weeks from today, the Magistrate shall take into WPC17657/10 -:2:- consideration all relevant aspects of the case and pass appropriate orders expeditiously. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Bhabani Prasad Ray, Judge. sl.