<.-^? ^^\^l 0| ^ •tj 4 ^ .^p.^ ^ 4A ^iA ^^ ^ 5T ^ ><t) ^-' XI-HC-22 ^^ ^41.^1d< ^^S^T^ ^^y. 3T?^T^T f^iF^3?i1^ "^HT^ ^i^a ..^^sii ^. iiilgs^^'""". pp-- ^iTO^r^^!^••^-^"•^•s^--"^-m-2.^ 37T^I'^nW^f^T TT7.2001 :Mr7Vijay Deshmukh for the petit Dr. N.K.Shukla leamed Dy.A.G. For the Sta| Petitioner had launched Revanchil India Ltd. Chit Fund jourts. In coimection with ^re Judicial Magistrate Ist ?d on bail. In another case Scheme. He is prosecuted in various crime no. 117/98 trial is going on bef<| class, Bilaspur where he has been releas] +l^<ri^'1 •TO^r'^ fe^ •^R^ ^3FiNH3R^T [oner. te. he is in Dhamtari sub jail in connection the taal is going on before ChiefJudici^ yet another case the trial is going on in Magistrate, Durg, in connection with| crime petitioner is injail for fhe last three yea^ be expedited. State will see that fhe witaejsses are produced in court for trial. Fortaightly reportbe submitte< Court fhrough the District and Sessions J ith crime no. 229/98 and Magistrate, Dhamtari.In le court ofChiefJudicial no.67/2000. The s. The trial is; directed to 1 to fhe Registrar of this [udge. The petitioner is in judicial custody, as he has not beenj granted bail, he made complaint to ChiefJudicial Magistrate w^io ought to have inquired and passed orders. That has not been (^one, pointed out amicus curiae. Chief Judicial Magistrate should|have inquired about fhe ^s shall forfhwith inquire trtrial, in accordance with |food to tfae applicant .If '^ it shall be provided by that he be transferred to complaint. The Chief Judicial Magis about fhe complaint, made ifany, by und^ law. The state is duty bound to provide] some amount is required for that purpos^ the State authorities. The petitioner pmys Durg Jail so that his case at Durg wjhiere only two or three witaesses remain to be examined can transferred and kept at Durg. In the ca^ wittiesseshave to be examined and it will the trial at Durg the jail authorities may coj )e decided. He may be e at Dhamtari about 37 take time. As such after ^isider his case and he be kept at Raipur or Dhamtari wherever it mab^ be convenient. The court concemed and the chiefjud| the cases are pending to expedite the ti-i operate. The magistrate concemed should visit jail jj District and Sessions Judge ^nd the Chief Judicial teriodically, so that lris?<»r grievance ofundertrial prisoners ifany m4y be redressed then and there and suitable order may be passed. Certified copy free ofcost Photocopy of fhe order be also senjt cial magistrate wherever |al and state also to co- District and Sessions Judge and the CJM q Before parting the court appreciates thJ Shri Vijay Deshmukh. to the petitioner and oncemed. Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge .^\^ •\rs. ^ ^nr^ ^i<s}<Lr