IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-10331 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 06, 2011 Savitri Devi …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Surinder Singh Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) This is a petition seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 94 dated 31.05.2010, under Sections 304-B/498-A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Bhattu Kalan. As per the prosecution story, soon after the marriage, husband, father-in-law, present petitioner (mother- in-law) started demanding car in the dowry; Savita, daughter of the complainant, was tortured repeatedly in connection with demand of the dowry for which an application was filed Crl. Misc. No. M-10331 of 2011 in Police Station Adampur and before Superintendent of Police, Hisar and Nodal Cell; Nodal Cell, Hisar persuaded Savita and her husband Rohtash to compromise the matter and her husband and in-laws promised that they would not harass her on account of demand of dowry in future. Therefore, Savita was sent back to her matrimonial house. Thereafter, again accused party started treating Savita with cruelty for demand of dowry. Savita was found dead in her matrimonial house within 7 years of marriage. Cause of death was strangulation. I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Dismissed. April 06, 2011 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2