hvn 903//wp//2383.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2383 OF 2011 Vishnu Jagannath Manthalkar ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. ... Respondents Mr. M.R. Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs.M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for State. CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL,J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the original complainant. At the stage of 313 Cr.P.C. statement, an application for production of income tax return was moved. The learned Judge rejected the same and it is questioned. On going through the order, I do not see any error on the part of the learned Judge. The Income tax return to which reference is made relates to the post period transactions and naturally of no consequence. Application lacks merit. Dismissed. (K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.) 1