IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.216 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.216 OF 2006 OF MOTION NO.216 OF 2006 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO.1202 of 2005 (L) NO.1202 of 2005 (L) NO.1202 of 2005 IN IN IN SUMMONS SUMMONS SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 1108 OF 2003 FOR JUDGMENT NO. 1108 OF 2003 FOR JUDGMENT NO. 1108 OF 2003 IN IN IN SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUIT NO.2718 OF 2003 SUIT NO.2718 OF 2003 SUIT NO.2718 OF 2003 Sunjeet Advertising Pvt. Ltd. .. Applicant V/s Asia Today Limited and Ors. .. Respondents ----- CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. : 10TH MARCH, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. None appears for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Applicant is seeking condonation of 7 days delay. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit-in-support thereof. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a). (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)