1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2843 of 2008 (Gulam Siddiqui Khan Vs. The State) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr.G.R.Syed, Adv., h/f Mr. R.R.Shaikh, Adv., for the applicant. Mr.S.G.Nandedkar, APP for respondent State. Mr. S.D.Hiwrekar, Adv., for respondent no.2. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 24/9/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard Counsel for respective parties. 2. In a family feud and bickering between the husband and wife, it is unfortunate that Crime No.I-140/2007 for an offense under Sections 341, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC is initiated/registered by none else than Deputy Superintendent of Police/husband, respondent no.2. 2 3. Prima facie, the recitals do not demonstrate that it is germination of falsehood. It is only at the trial the mist can be cleared, however, at this stage, no interference, except observing that Gazala Parveen w/o complainant Azmat Inamdar shall be given exemption by the learned Judge on her application, if her presence is not compulsorily required. Interim protection dt. 27.8.2008 vacated. Application disposed of. Now, at the request of both the sides, the learned Judge seized with the matter will ensure expeditious disposal. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/2843-08crapl