IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29624 of 2009 1. PANKAJ SINGH 2. ARUN SINGH 3. BANTI SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 01.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are in custody in a Police case under Sections 302 of the Penal Code. The submission is that the F.I.R. is against unknown. There is no eye-witness to the occurrence. The impugned order of rejection only refers to certain paragraphs of the case diary to state that ‘it clearly shows involvement of the petitioner’, ‘there is sufficient material in the case diary’ without disclosing in the order what was the nature of sufficiency of the materials to enable judicial review of the order. This Court is satisfied that in absence of any material in the case diary, the impugned order contains no reasoning. Let the petitioners, abovenamed be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Lakhisarai in Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 18 of 2008. Let this order be placed before the Presiding Officer, who passed the impugned order. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.) 2