IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.25092 of 2008 Between: T.M. Veeranna S/o. T.M. Thippaiah Shop No.42 (old), 45 (New), Hanumesh Nagar, Guntakal, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur. 2 The Tahsildar, Guntakal, Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in spite of subsisting authorization of the petitioner relating to F.P.Shop No.42(old) 45 (New) of Guntakal Urban, Anantapur District and without cancelling the same by issuing proceedings i.e., Rc.No.D1/C.S./2170/2008 dt. 5.11.2008 calling the candidates for interview on 15.11.2008 for the petitioner's F.P. Shop as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, also against the Andhra Pradesh State PDS Control Order, 2001 and consequently direct the respondents to supply the stocks to the petitioner during the subsisting of authorization relating to F.P.Shop No.42 (old) 45 (New) of Guntakal Urban, Anantapur District. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K. MAHESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.25092 of 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedies available to him under law. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as sought for. No order as to costs. _________________ JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU 23rd March, 2009. IBL