1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.140/2005. with CA NO.10592/2006. (Asma Hussain w/o Iqbal Hussain and Ors. Vs. The Purna Education Committee and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 19 th November, 2010. ... 1) Counsel called, absent. 2) Perused the record. 3) Rule in this CRA was granted on 16.2.2006 4) The judgment and decree in Special Civil Suit No.112/1993 and Regular Civil Appeal No.19/2003, are questioned by the petitioners. 5) It was pleaded that both the courts have not appreciated the oral evidence, adduced by the petitioners by examining PW 1 – Abdul Latif and PW/ 2 – Yuvraj Patil or of the defendant no.1 – Sayyed Ahmed, in proper perspective. 6) On analyzing the findings of both the 2 courts, I do not see any error on the part of both the authorities in dismissing the suit. The order under challenge does not call for any interference. CRA lacks merit, dismissed. Rule discharged. CA disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/