1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 382 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 381 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant VERSUS Dnyanoba s/o Kisanrao Shingire ...Respondent ..... Smt. B.R.Khekale, advocate for applicant Shri S.J.Salgare, advocate holding for Smt.S.S.Jadhav, advocate for sole respondent ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 23 rd June, 2010 PER COURT : 1 Heard Smt. B.R.Khekale, advocate for applicant and Shri S.J.Salgare, advocate holding for Smt.S.S.Jadhav, advocate for sole respondent. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant for 2 condonation of delay of 27 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Application seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 4.10.2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Nilanga in Special Case No. 1 of 2006. 3 For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and it further appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying application is not willful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 Hence, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 27 days causing in filing the accompanying application seeking leave to file appeal stands condoned and the present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap382.09 3