IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. 43364-M of 2006 Date of decision : February 28, 2008 Tejinder Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents *** CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL **** Present: Mr. S.P. Soi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S.Bhuller, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. RAJESH BINDAL, J. This is a petition for direction to respondent No. 2 to register FIR against respondents No. 3 and 4. Learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab states that the present petition is not maintainable in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and others 2008 (1) RCR (Criminal) 392. Once in terms of the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu's case (supra), the petitioner has effective alternative remedy under Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure this Court would not like to interfere in the matter in its extra ordinary jurisdiction. Faced with this situation, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, with liberty to the petitioner to avail of his alternative remedy in accordance with law. February 28, 2008 (Rajesh Bindal) Pka Judge