B/- -fiSUBLOEfiyHATHSeAgHALBU-ASHJR WR!T PET'TIQN {§)No,3gl3 of20n7 • Ram Kumar Patet S/o Shiv Prasad Patel, Aged about - 50 years, Assistarst Teacher, Government Primary Schooi- Amjhar, Block-Sarangarh, Tahsi! & District- Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS t. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Sscretary, Schoo! Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director, Public Instruction, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 3. The District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block-Pusour, Dlstrict Raigarh (C.G.) VVRJT PETiTiON UNDER ARTiCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Single Bench : Hon'bie Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri Preseni: Shri Sanjay Patei, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, Dy. Go"t. Advocate for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on this 11tn day "f Ju!y, 2007) 1. The question of law involved herein is asto wiiether the petitioner is entltled tp regular pay scaie w.e.f. the date of initial appointment or from the date of completion of probation period. 2. Learned oounse! appeahng tbr the petiiloner as weil as for the respondents/State jointly submit thar the facts and question. of law involved in ths present writ petition are the same to that of in W.P. (S) No. 5976/2006 (Svshii Tiwari and others vs. State Qovernment of Chrtattisgarh and others), which was allowed vide order dated 7.11.2006. 3. In view of the above-statsd submissions made by iearned counsei appearing for the parties, the writ petition is ailowed in the same terms, subjecttoverificationofthefacts, No oider as to costs. __^_^——— l' SatishK.Agiutaotri ; , Judge ,