1 cp270.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.270 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITIONNO. 510 OF 1999 [ Rajkumar Satayanarayan Agroya vs. State of Mah. & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Ankush G. Shinde, Advocate holding for Mr. A.M. Awate, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. D.V. Tele, AGP for State/Respondents. Mrs. R.R. Reddy, Advocate for Resp.No.3. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 7TH JULY, 2011 PER COURT : Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for respective respondents and learned A.G.P. 2. In pursuant to order on 21-06-2011 the Collector, Latur had afforded opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and then passed orders on 30-06-2011. Counsel for respondent No. 3 submits that compensation amount has been paid to the 2 cp270.10 petitioner. State has also filed affidavit in reply stating that there is compliance of the order of which disobedience has been alleged in this contempt petition. 3. In the light of affidavit in reply filed by the State and also statement of Counsel for respondents and order dated 30-06-2011 passed by the Collector,Latur, in my opinion, no further orders are required to be passed in this contempt petition. Contempt Petition is disposed of. Notice stands discharged. 4. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 30-06-2011 passed by the Collector, Latur, in that case, he can challenge the said order before appropriate Forum, in accordance with law. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/JUL11