IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2009 / 13TH PHALGUNA 1930 RP.No. 189 of 2009(E) --------------------- {IN WPC.34691/2004 OF THIS COURT} .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------------------------------------------ K. POCKER, S/O. KUNHIKUTTY ALI HAJI, SENIOR MANAGERE (HIGHER GRADE (RETIRED), KERALA STAE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD., NOW RESIDING AT KALLANGONDAN HOUSE, KALPETTA, WYNAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS ----------------------------------------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, REGISTERED OFFICE BHADRATHA, MUSEUM ROAD, THRISSUR - 680 020. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED, REGISTERED OFFICE BHADRATHA, MUSEUM ROAD, THRISSUR - 680 020. 3. M.K. KARTHIKEYAN, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR (FORMER) THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED, REGISTERED OFFICE BHADRATHA, MUSEUM ROAD, THRISSUR - 680 020. RP.No. 189 of 2009 :: 2 :: 4. SHRI. P.K. RADHAKRISHNAN, ADVOCATE (ENQUIRY OFFICER, K.S.F.E LIMITED), NEAR TOWN HALL, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY ADV.SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI, J. ------------------------- R.P.No.189 of 2009 in W.P.(C).No.34691 of 2004 ------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of March, 2009. O R D E R I do not find any grounds to review the judgment by which the writ petition was allowed at the instance of the petitioner himself. 2. Mr.P.B.Krishnan, learned counsel for the review petitioner points out that the respondents have understood the judgment in such a manner that the judgment has not resulted in any benefit derived by the petitioner as such. This is possibly resultant upon a wrong understanding of the judgment. I do not think that these are matters which will afford any justification for review of the judgment. In the circumstances, the review petition is dismissed; but without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to take appropriate action challenging Annexure A or institute other proceedings as is deemed fit and advised. Sd/- (V.GIRI) JUDGE sk/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge