IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.995 of 2009 SYED SHAH ISRAR HUSSAIN son of late Syed Shah Wajid Hussain, resident of Mohalla Dargah Shah Arzan, P.S. Sultanganj, District Patna. . . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Zonal Inspector General of Police, Patna Zone, Patna 5. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Range, Patna. 6. The District Magistrate, Patna. 7. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. 8. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Patnacity Patna. 9. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Patna Sadar, Patna. 10. The Circle Officer, Patna. 11. The Officer-in-charge, Ram Krishna Nagar Police Station, Patna. 12. Rambali Yadav, son of Vishundeo Gope. 13. Nandu Prasad son of Barhu Singh. 14. Mahanand Prasad son of Nandu Prasad. 15. Sideshwar Singh son of Badri Narayan Singh 16. Pappu Yadav son of late Mani Singh. 17. Anil Singh son of Jamuna Singh. All respondents no. 12 to 17 are resident of village Nandlal Chapra, P.S. Ramkrishna Nagar, District Patna. . . . . . . Respondents. ----------- 2/ 16.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. In the instant writ application, the petitioner prays for providing adequate and required police protection so that he may be able to construct boundary wall situated at village Nandlal Chapra, Thana no. 45, Khata no. 55 and khesara no. 46, measuring 2.82 acres, as in spite of the direction and order passed by the S.D.O. Sadar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid land was settled to him by one Syed Shah Hamid Hussain and subsequently Jamabandi No. 280 was created in his favour vide 2 order as contained in Memo no. 1384 dated 27.06.2007 passed in Mutation case no. 32/07-08 by the Circle officer, Patna Sadar. The petitioner thereafter has been paying rent receipts. He further submits that he started constructing boundary wall, miscreants, who have been added as respondent nos. 12 to 17 in the writ petition started creating trouble. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that aforesaid respondents do not have any chit of paper in their favour in respect of land in question. The petitioner filed application before the Sub-Divisional Officer, Patna Sadar to depute an Executive Magistrate with police force at the site and application before the Circle Officer, Patna Sadar for demarcating boundary wall. The Circle Officer, Patna Sadar vide order dated 18.12.2008 requested S.D.O., Sadar, Patna for deputation of Executive Magistrate, so that measurement can be done. Pursuant to the order of the C.O. Sadar, Patna, Anchal Amin completed the measurement and on 27.12.2008 the land of the petitioner was demarcated. Learned counsel submits that still the miscreants did not allow to construct boundary wall. The petitioner, as such filed application before the officer-in-charge, Ram Krishna Nagar, Police Station, who requested the D.I.G., Central Range, Patna for providing adequate security to the petitioner. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the State. In my view, if the petitioner files a representation before the S.S.P., Patna elaborating the facts of the case, he will look into 3 the matter and issue necessary direction as the case may be. It will be open for the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna to hear even the respondent nos. 13 to 17, if so required. With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)