IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.5092 of 2009 Date of Decision : 07.09.2009 Anil Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Another ...Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr. N.K.Malhotra, Advocate, for the petitioner. HEMANT GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The plaintiff is in revision aggrieved against the order passed by the learned Courts below, whereby his application for stay of order dated 18.3.2009 and to restrain the defendants from de-regularizing the services of the plaintiffs, was dismissed. The plaintiff has sought interim order in respect of status of his services. In the event, the plaintiff succeeds, the plaintiff shall be entitled to all consequential benefits. Therefore, under the guise of interim order, the main relief cannot be granted to the petitioner. In view of the above, I do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the Courts below, which may warrant interference by this Court in the present revision petition. Dismissed. 07.09.2009 (HEMANT GUPTA) Vimal JUDGE