BEFORE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT PETITIONER w.P. 1 2$ 12003 f : Sundarlal , S/o. Dayaram, ¢*'¢‘*C"“d"?'7l?cw‘ Jawahar Market Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1% Regional Transport Authority Raipur (C.G.) State Government of Chhattisgarh Through —— Transport Secretary Ra/ip‘ur (C.G.)/f“ I ,2 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2247 OECONSTITUTION OF INDIA . J X WW I a { XI~HG22 Considen'ng the naturt of th€ prayer made, thc' matter is taken up during vacation and or 1, the prayer and consent of learne counsel for the petitioner and t1 1e respondent, the. matter is being disposed of. Admittedly, the petitionelt had filed an application under Section 82 of the Motor Vehicle: LAct, 1988 on 18/01/2001 before the Regional Transport Authori r in his favour. i The grievance of the pct] years have elapse}: no orders a1 for a direction to the respondent to Accordingly, the prayer is made .\ dispose of his application within Considering the limited na is disposed of byrdirecting thi a respondent (Regional Transport Authon'ty) to dispose of the applj cation made on 18/ 1/ 2001 within I the pen'od of four weeks from th‘ 5 date of receipt] communication-0f . 03/06/2003 Shri Ajay Shrivastava, cou asel for the petitioner; Shn' Rajesh Pandey, GA f0 r the State. ty for transfer of permit No.24] 94 i tioner is that though nearly two e being passed on his application. the stipulated period. ture of the prayer, the writ petition Ndéfad u d XI-HC—22 the order. It is made clear tha opinion on the merits of the decided by the concerned a thority on its own merits in accordance with relevant statute With the aforesaid ohse ations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Co sequently, I.A.No‘s 4747/2003 and 4748/ 2003 also stand cuspo ed of. ‘ F the Coult is Q‘ot expressing any i said application which will be provisions. Sd/-\ P.C.Naik Judge '\" _r_j i V ii