IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.4864 of 2008 SANCHAY KUMAR, S/0- LATE RAMADHAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – TEJPUR, POST KANAIYAGANJ, P.S. TELHADA, DISTRICT - NALANDA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PURNIA. 4. THE PROVIDENT FUND OFFICER, PURNIA. 5. THE TREASURY OFFICER, PURNIA ----------- For the Petitioner : - Mr. Niraj Kumar. For the State :- S.C. – IV For the Accountant General:- Mr. L.P.K. Rajgirihar, Advocate S.C. 04. 17.11.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State as also the Accountant General. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State after serving a copy to the other side today in court. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in light of the order of this court passed on 28th of February 2009, petitioner has submitted all the relevant documents on 04.04.2009 before the respondent no. 3 In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 3 enclosing the copy of the relevant documents if any, in support of such claim along with certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks from today. In case such representation is filed, the respondent no. 3 shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioner in his representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. Upon consideration, if the admitted dues payable to the petitioner, be paid with statutory interest. However, if any of the claims are found not admissible, the same shall be communicated to the petitioners with reasons thereof. The writ application is disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)