Sr. No. Date Orders EN TKE HIGH COURT OF DELE! AT NEW DEI.: + S.T.C. 3/2003 M/S BIIARTI TRAX)ERS ...... Petitioner Through : Mr, D.M'. Sinha, Adv. versus TI-IE SALES TAX OMCER & ORS Respondent Through : ^'Ir. H.L. Taneja, A.dv HOri'BLE Mli. JUSTICE- SWATANTER Ell&mS HOR^BLE MR. ..lUSTIGE I^iABAN B. LOKUR ' % • ORDER 10.02.2005 Vide order dated 16^'' November, -2004 the learned counsel had sought an adjournment to file a separate reference application in the subject matter of the petition. • On 3'" Januarys 2005, the counsel had stared that he has alread^f filed a separate reference. From the record before us tliLs appeai-s to be factually Incorrect. On 24'^ J^inuai^/, 2005, the learned counsel had filed an am-ended question of lav/ in the Sales Tajf Case already pending. We do not thirJv it was correct compliance of the orders of the Court and the lav/ governing the subject. SACHKHAND PRINTERS I'U. J. UJ ^ Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Sr. No. Date Orders 111 tlie circumstances £iforenoticed, the learned counsel for the petitioner \\4shes to wididraw this petition \¥ith liberty to file t"\¥o separate petitions in accordance with law. ' The petition is dismissed as- withdrawn. Libert}^ as prayed for, is granted., FEBRUARY 10, 2O0S dk' S.T.C. 3/2003 L MADMI B. J Pa 2 of 2 SACHKHAND PRINTERS 01/G5