1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2032 OF 2011 (The Jawahar Smruti Shikshan Samiti vs. State of Maharashtra and others) __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : APRIL 28, 2011 CIVIL APPLICAION NO.1137 OF 2011 Heard Shri Dharmadhikari, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Civil Application No.1137/2011 is moved by the petitioner for dispensing with filing of English translation of some Marathi documents. Shri Dharmadhikari, learned Counsel for the petitioner, undertakes to file English translation of the said documents, if required by the Court at the time of hearing of the petition. In view of the above referred statement of 2 the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the civil application is allowed. WRIT PETITION NO.2032 OF 2011 Heard Shri Dharmadhikari, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mrs. Deshpande, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. Shri Dharmadhikari, learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner Samiti runs Ashram School at village Marki, Taluq Zari Jamni, District Yavatmal, It is submitted that recognition of the said Ashram School came to be cancelled vide order dated 4/12/2010 passed by the respondent no.3 Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, against which the petitioner has preferred an appeal before the State Government on 4/1/2011 along with stay application, which is pending for decision. It is further submitted that though petitioner tried to move the State Government for considering request of the petitioner for grant of interim relief, however, the request of the petitioner was not considered by the 3 State Government. It is, therefore, prayed that State Government may be directed to decide the appeal of the petitioner on its own merits in accordance with law within a stipulated period. In the backdrop of the above referred facts, since appeal of the petitioner is pending for decision, we direct the State Government to decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard as early as possible and in any case not beyond the period of two months from the date of communication of this order. It is open for the petitioner to approach the State Government and revive its request regarding grant of interim relief. With these observations and directions, the petition is disposed of by keeping the issues open. JUDGE JUDGE khj