IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2006 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1928 RP.No. 1094 of 2006(F) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.17904/2001 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER ---------------------------------- P.P.NARAYANAN, S/O.LATE K.KUNHAPPA, K.V.HOUSE, POST PATTANUR, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.A.K.ABDUL AZEEZ RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE DISTRICT EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KERALA MOTOR TRANSPORT WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD, KANNUR. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, THALASSERY, KANNUR. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR. R2&3 BY G.P. SRI.SURARSHAN R1 BY SRI.PAULSON C.VARGHESE, SC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... R.P. No.1094 of 2006 in O.P. No.17904 of 2006 .................................................................... Dated this the 13th day of December, 2006. ORDER The review is filed for the reason that respondents are demanding interest for belated payment of welfare fund and collection charges thereon. So far as interest is concerned, since petitioner wants to contest the same, date of service of notice, the period of delay and the amount of interest payable should be communicated by the first respondent through a detailed order. The first respondent is directed to issue a detailed statement of liability towards interest showing the provision under which, the period for which and the rate at which interest is payable for the petitioner to contest it if he so desires. However, no collection charges should be recovered for payments voluntarily made by the petitioner if such payments are made atleast by the end of February, 2007. R.P. is disposed of with the above directions. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms