MCC Restoration / Recall Application No. 830 of 2008 CLMA Delay Condonation Application No. 4423 of 2008 In FA No. 37 of 2005 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Hon’ble S. Dhulia, J. Mr. J.C. Belwal, learned counsel for appellant. Mr. H.M. Raturi, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Sobhit Saharia, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2. Perused the grounds shown for delay in filing the present restoration / recall application. On 13.8.2008, this first appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. Thereafter, for recalling the said order, a restoration application was filed along with an application for condonation of delay, but being unsatisfied with the reasons given for condonation of delay, the said restoration application was dismissed on 2.11.2007. Today, again a restoration application has been filed along with an application for condonation of delay. After perusal of the application for condonation of delay supported by an affidavit, we find that the reasons for delay in filing the restoration application for recalling the order dated 2.11.2007 as well as 13.8.2007 have not satisfactorily been explained. Accordingly, delay condonation application is rejected. Consequently, the restoration application stands dismissed. (S. Dhulia, J.) (P.C. Verma, J.) 26.11.2008 26.11.2008 Prabodh/Rathour