skt/- arbp.623.09.sxw ..1.. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 623 OF 2009 Reliance Capital Ltd. ...Petitioner. Vs. Mukesh D. Rohira & Anr. ...Respondents. ..... Mr.Omar Khayam Shaikh i/by Vikas Salvi & Assoc. for the petitioner. None for the respondents. ..... CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 13th JANUARY, 2010. P.C.- 1. None appeared for the respondents, though served. Considering the averments made and as there is consistent default, as there is no any reply/denial to the averments, as this Court, on 11th September 2009, while admitting the petition, has already granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) and still none appeared for the respondents, in my view, a sufficient case is made out by the petitioner for prayer clause (a). The statement is also made that the respondents have already sold/transferred the vehicle to third person. skt/- arbp.623.09.sxw ..2.. 2. Considering the averments made, I am inclined to grant prayer clause (a). However, time is granted to furnish security on or before 10th March 2010. 3. The petition is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) as well as (c). No costs. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)