THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2459 of 2007 Date: 15.02.2008 Between: Sirna Sudharshan and another … Petitioners AND The Govt. of A.P., Rep by Secretary, Roads and Buildings Department, Hyderabad. And others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: None Counsel for respondents: None HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.2459 of 2007 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking the following substantive relief: “..Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents 2 to 6 herein to execute the work undertaken by the R & B Department for public purpose i.e., for making improvements to Hyderabad-Medak- Bodhan road from Km.148/9 to 150/4 in Banswada town limits by strictly following road development plan and the R& B department guidelines issued i.e., for maintaining 100 ft. road by removing the encroachments if any within the R&B road boundary upto 50 ft. from the center of the above mentioned road without any bias and discrimination by duly declaring the action of the authorities in undertaking the above said improvement work for dismantling the buildings of the petitioners and others situated on the east side of the above main road without maintaining the same yardstick of the guidelines issued by the R&B department on either side of the road more particularly in the case of buildings situated on the western side of the road at the instance of owners of the buildings who are owning shops-cum-residences on western side of the main road i.e., opposite to our buildings in Banswada town limits is nothing but arbitrary, discriminatory and unjustified and contrary to the road development plan and guidelines issued by the R&B department for making improvements to the roads and also violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and pass such other order..” At the hearing, there is no representation for the parties. A perusal of the record shows that on 13.2.2007 this Court passed the following order: “ There shall be interim direction to the respondents to undertake the process of widening of the road in such a way that the widening takes place equally on both sides of the existing road, in accordance with law. Any deviation from this can be only on the basis of specific consent of the affected parties.” In view of the above re-produced interim order, which has the effect of fully redressing the grievance of the petitioners, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.3156 of 2007 filed by the petitioner seeking interim relief is dismissed as infructuous. ___________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:15.02.2008 mdaa