IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17624 of 2010 AMIT KUMAR SINGH, S/o Raj Kishor Singh. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 22.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 25(1-B) A, 26 and 37(B) of the Arms Act. It has been submitted that the petitioner was refused bail by order dated 28.01.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 1394 of 2010 considering that the petitioner had demanded rangdari from the informant and was caught with arms at the spot. The submission is that now the charge-sheet has been submitted only under the provisions of Arms Act whereas the allegation of rangdari has been found to be false. Considering the same and that the petitioner is in custody since 26.10.2009, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Rajeev Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bettiah, West Champaran (or his successor) in connection with Chanpatia P.S. Case No. 191 of 2009 (Tr. No. 1209 of 2010) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a 2 close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)