AB 1102/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE C.R.. SARMA Heard Mr. S.K. Jain, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner. Also heard M r. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State-responde nt and Mr. M.B.U. Ahmed, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the informant. Perused the Case Diary and the affidavit, submitted by the informant i.e. the fa ther of the victim girl. The learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner, has submitted that, as direct ed by this Court, the petitioner had produced the victim girl before the Court a nd her statement has already been recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. The learned counsel, appearing for both the parties, have submitted that, the vi ctim girl, after her recovery, is staying with her parents and that she will at her own choice to marry after attaining her majority. The victim girl, in her statement, recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., stated th at, she had love affairs with the petitioner for the last five years and that sh e went with him at her own will. The petitioner is already on pre-arrest bail w. e.f. 04.05.2011. There is no adverse report against the petitioner. Having heard the learned counsel, appearing for both the parties and considering the entire aspect of the matter, I am of the opinion that, custodial interrogat ion of the petitioner is no more warranted for the purpose of investigation in c onnection with the present case. Accordingly, the interim order, dated 04.05.2011 is made absolute, subject to th e condition that, the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer a s and when required. With the above direction, this A.B. Application is disposed of. Return the Case Diary.