/ @ :;:?‘asgri§;m §§<amg~v IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmseARH AT BILAsPuR (ca) w.P. s No. >67 o /2o11 , PETITIONER : Shiv Kumar‘ Kurr'e S/o Shri Khor'bahar'a Ram, Aged about 46 / ‘ years, Lecturer, Governmenf Higher Secondary School Baimanagoi, Bilha Disff. Bilaspur (6.6.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. S’ra‘re of Chha’r’risgarh Through Secretary, School Educa’rion Deparfmenf D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.6.) 2. District Educa’rion Officer Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. The Principle Governmen‘r Higher Secondary School, Baimanagoi, Disff. Bilaspur (6.6.) 4. Join? Direcfor, Treasury Accoum‘ & Pension Bilaspur Disft Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION E OF INDIA The pefifioner named above mosf respectfully begs To submif as under:- \ g. ‘ 9 @B HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER, WKPJSLNO. 7540 [201 1 Shri K.S.Pawar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.V.Shridhar, P.L. for the State. WRIT PE’NTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ORDER (13. 12.2011) Grievancg of the petitioner in this petition is that though he is entitled to receive two advance increments pursuant to passing of B.Ed course, the same has not been granted to him. Counsel for the petitioner submits that his case is squarely covered with number of decisions passed by this Court including the one in the matter of Asha Saxena Vs. State of M.P. & Others, 2009 (II!) MPJR (SC) 59 (Annexure P/S). He submits that in view of this judgment besides many others, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation before respondent N03, raising all his grievances. Counsel for the petitioner also craves for a direction to the competent authority to decide the said representation as expeditiously as oossible. Counsel for the State also assures that representation if any made by the petitioner, shall be decided in accordance with law, as early as possibie. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as Withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. However, if the petitioner makes a representation Within one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the competent authority shall decide the same Within a further period of two months from the date of its receipt in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. a ma, Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge PETITIONER Shiv Kumar EéuxTE versus RESPONDENTs State of Chhattisgarh & Others