IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17720 of 2005 MD.SAKIR ALI @ SAKIR ALI, NADRAGANJ, CIVIL LINES, GAYA. VERSUS 1. STATE OF BIHAR & 2. IRAFANA ANJUM W/O MD SAKIR ALI, CIVIL LINES, GAYA. ----------- 3 18.03.2010. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has come to this court for quashing order taking cognizance dated 19.4.2003 under section 498A I.P.C. and 4 of othe Dowry Prohibition Act, passed by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Complaint case no. 1340 of 2002, Tr no. 1089 of 2003. This court vide order dated 1.3.2006 had directed office to list this case after disposal of Cr. Misc. Number 24324 of 2005, filed by Irfana Anjum w/o the petitioner. Aforesaid case had been filed by Anjum for cancelling bail granted to opp party/ petitioner. He appeared on notice and filed show cause on his behalf and other accused persons stating that they have decided to part on certain terms and conditions as agreed between them. It was further submitted by the parties that they propose to file an application before the court below on the same terms and conditions. As the parties have agreed to part on mutually on agreed terms, this Court disposed of cancellation application vide order dated 26.9.2006. It would appear in the instant case that the learned Magistrate finding prima facie case to be made out under section 498A I.P.C. and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act took cognizance of the offence against the petitioner. - 2 - The instant application is disposed of with observation that if any compromise petition of the parties is pending or filed, the learned Magistrate would dispose of the same in view of the compromise petition without delay. Shashi. (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)