IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8934 of 2006 RAMESHWAR PRASAD, son of late Govind Lall, Retired as Senior Accounts Clerk, S.G.G.S. College, Patna Saheb, Patna presently residing in Khangar Gali, Diwan Mohalla, Patna City, Patna-800008…. …Petitioner. Versus 1. MAGADH UNIVERSITY through its Vice Chancellor, Bodh Gaya, Gaya, 2. Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya, 3. Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya, 4. Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya, 5. S.G.G.S. College through the Principal, Patna Saheb, Patna… …..Respondents. For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Prakash, Advocate. For Respondent University: Mr. Hans Raj, Advocate. ……………… 3 25.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks direction to the respondents for proper fixation of the pay in the scale of Account Clerk- cum-Accountant in the facts and circumstances of his case and the consequential benefits in the light of such fixation. No counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner drew attention of this Court towards order dated 19.04.2006 passed in MJC No.1150 of 2005 (Rameshwar Prasad Vs. The State of Bihar 2 & ANR.) to impress upon that during the pendency of the aforesaid application, the retiral dues of the petitioner was paid and, thus, only grievance of the petitioner that remained to be redressed was with respect to fixation of pay in the light of the report of the Justice S.C Agrawal’s Commission and the consequential payment of other dues accordingly. Accordingly, by order dated 19.04.2006 passed in M.J.C No.1150 of 2005, liberty was granted to the petitioner to move before the concerned authority for redressal of such grievances. It is urged on behalf of the petitioner that representation in this regard was filed as back as in the year 2006 itself which was sent to the concerned by registered post. However, the same has not been disposed of by the Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya till date which has been on record as Annexure-2. In above view of the matter, let the petitioner file a fresh representation to the concerned authority within eight weeks from today. If such application is filed, let the same be considered and decided on its own merit in accordance with law within three months from the date of filing of such representation. It is made clear that if the case 3 of the petitioner finds favour of concerned authority and he is found entitled for some amount then the same shall be paid within two months after such decision having been taken. Accordingly, this writ application stands disposed of with the observations and directions as indicated above. It is made clear that this Court has not formed or expressed any opinion with regard to the merit of the case of the petitioner. Sanjay-II (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)