In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … CWP No.254 of 1987 Date of decision: 11.4.2008 Kulwant Rai Gupta Petitioner Versus Municipal Committee Bathinda and another Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg Present: Mr. Kashmir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. IPS Doabia, Advocate for respondent No.1-MC Bathinda (Now Municipal Corporation,Bathinda) Mr.Vijay Chaudhary, AAG,Punjab for respondent No.2 .. Rakesh Kumar Garg,J(Oral) Learned counsel for respondent No.1, on the basis of instructions from Shri Pargat Singh, Inspector, (HouseTax), Municipal Corporation, Bathinda has stated that assessment of the petitioner against the property in dispute has already been made by the respondent-Corporation and no tax is due against the petitioner on this account. In view of the aforesaid statement , learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the writ petition and the same is dismissed as having become infructuous. April 11, 2008 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh … CWP No.2264 of 1987 Date of decision: 11.4.2008 M/s Parkash Steel Industries Petitioner Versus Municipal Committee Amloh and another Respondents Present: None for the parties .. Even earlier on 11.1.2006, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner and the case was adjourned to 15.2.2006. Thereafter, nobody put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner on 3.3.2006 and the case was adjourned for today,i.e.,11.4.2008. Even today, no body is present on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the case. Dismissed for non-prosecution. April 11, 2008 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) nk JUDGE