WP(C) 6073/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KOTISWAR SINGH Heard Mr. N. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. PN Gos wami, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2. In view of the nature of claim made in this writ petition, this writ petition can be disposed of at the motion stage after hearing the learned couns el for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the responden t Nos. 1 & 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner Madrassa was es tablished in the year 1996 in a remote village of Taltola, which has been runnin g therein till 2007. However, because of certain difficulties in maintaining/run ning the school in Taltola village, the petitioner had submitted a representatio n to the Director of Madrassa Education, Assam praying for shifting the Mdrassa to the Bagbari village, which was allowed by the authority, which can be seen fr om the order dated 25-09-2007 issued by the Director of Madrassa Education, Assa m. The main grievance of the petitioner is that in the month of Februar y, 2011, the Govt. of Assam has sanctioned an amount of Rs.4,05,000/- to the pet itioner Madrassa vide Bank draft No.544050 dated 21-02-2011. However, surprisi ngly, the respondent No.2 issued a letter dated 05-03-2011 to the concerned bank authority with a request not to encash the bank draft for the reason that the s ame was issued through over sight because a court is pending against Madrassa. At this stage, the petitioner submits that in view of the above pos ition, the authority may be directed to make an inquiry into the aforesaid matte r regarding the allegations and if it is found not to be true then necessary dir ection may be issued to the respondents to which the learned counsel appearing f or the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 has no objection. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of at the motion stage itself with a direction the to the respondents particularly, the responde nt No.1 to make an enquiry into the issue raise by the respondent No.2 within a period of 2 weeks. In the event, if the allegations made against the school are not found to be correct, the petitioner school is entitled to the financial assi stance already sanctioned by the Govt. of Assam. However, in the event, the all egations against the petitioner are found to be correct, the authority may take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law. In the light of the above observations and directions, this writ p etition stands disposed of.