y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM : HON'BLESHRI H.L. DATTU, CJ. HON'BLE SHRI V.K. SHRIVASTAVA, J. WrjtPetitionJSIo^525of20Q5 •i.r<> PETITIONERS ^ RESPOJSIDENTS \. 4. Naresh Kumar Lahare, S/o Shri Sevaram Lahare, aged about 36 years, R/o Village Jhonka, Post- Kankeli, Janapad Panchayat Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur, C.G. Ghanshayam Joshi, S/o Late Inderman Joshi, aged about 52 years, (Ex Janpad Sadsya, Lilapur) R/o Village - Dhondhapara, Tehsil- Lormi Distt. Bilaspur, C.G. Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). Janpad Panchayat Lormi, Through Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur, C.G. Selection Committee, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, Through the Secretary Selection Committee, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur, C.G. Smt. Chandra Kala Baghel, W/o Shri Bhagawat BagheJ, aged about 55 years, Occupation - President Janpad Panchayat Lormi and President Selection Committee Janpad Panchayat Lormi, R/o Village- Parsa Kanpa, Janpad Panchayat Lormj, Distt. Bilaspur, C.G. Ummed Lal Jaiswal, S/o Shri Chainu Ram Jaiswal^ aged about 40 years, Occupatjon - Block Education Officer, Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur, C.G. Smt. Rashmi Dindore, D/o Shri Fagu Ram Kosle, aged about 32 years, Occupation Janpad Sadasya, R/o Village- Ghor Bandha, Janpad Panchayat, Lormi, Distt. Bilaspur, C.G. •II 7. Ku. Neeta Ghonsare, D/o Shri Shukhan Das, aged about 19 years, R/o Guruwaindabari, Lalpur, Tah. Lormi,Distt. Bilaspur(C.G.) 8. Ku. Lata Jaiswal, D/o Shri Ram Kumar Jaiswal, aged about 18 years, R/o Vill. Ramhepur, Tah. Lormi, Distt.Bilaspur (C.G.). 9. Yogender Kumar Kosle, S/o Fagu Ram Kosle, aged about 19 years, R/o Vill. Chhirputi, Tah-Lormi, Bilaspur 10. Ku. Vidya Kaiwart, D/o Bhagawat Ram, aged about 16 years - Through the natural guardian her father Bhagwat Ram, R/o Vill. Kapadah, Tah. Pandariya, Distt. Kawardha (C.G.). Present: Shri Rajesh Pandey, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Prashant Mishra, Addl. A.G. for the State / respondents No.1. Shri Vinay Harit, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Preeti Bhudia, counsel for respondente No. 2 to 4. Shri Dilip Dubey, counset for respondent No.7 ORAL ORDER (Passed on 15th IVIarch, 2007) The following oral order of the Court was passed by H.L. Dattu, C.J. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition in view of the law declared by the Apex Court in the case of Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware Vs. State of Maharashtra, reported in AIR 2005 SC 540. ?\ 'ls ' \ (2) Permission sought for is granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Security amount deposited by the petitioners shall be refunded by the Registry, within a period of three weeks frorp today. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- V.K.Shrivastava Judge ^,.