IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION ISI No. 1384 of 2009 Suresh Dubey S/o Raghav La! Dubey, aged about 65 yeats, Retired Panchayat and Social Education Organizer, R/o Jaijaipur, Black jaij'aépur, District Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) VERsUS I ' The State of Chhai‘tisgarh, Thraugh: The Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Social Weifare, uxs. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) . . The Direcior, Panchayat and gociai Welfare Department, Raipur (C.G.) - . The Collector, Janjgir—Champa, District Janjgir- Champa(C.G.) . The Coilector, Korba, District Korba‘{C.G.) . Deyuty Directer, Panchayat and $ociai Welfare Department; Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) . Deputy Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, Korba, District 'Korba (C.G.) . Chief Executive Officer, }anpacl Panchayat Jaijaipur, District Janjgir—Champa (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Korba, District Kama (C‘GJ . 9. Accauntant Generai, Gefieral Provident Fund Pagariya Complex, Pandri Raipur (0.6.) WRIT-PETHION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 5%: Hon’bie Sim Satisg K. Agnihetri, .i. Pfesent: 'PETITIOMFR RESPQNBENTS 8. Bnri Ramakant Pandey, Advccatefor the petitioner; Ms. ‘Sunita Jain, Panei Lawyei for the State/respondent No; i te shri A.K.Barik, Advecate appearing an behaii at Shri s.ii.3eriwai, 6. ' V Advocate for the respondent No. 9. GRAL ORDER (Passedon 18th~day of March, 2009) ““A, imaiiy. With/the censent of the panies; the matter is taken up for hearing rtearned counsel appearing for the petitioner submite that the case, being payment of retirai benefits matter, may be referred to the pensien committee; This Court, in the matter pf W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baljnath Manda! Vsl The State of Chhattisgarh‘Sz Others) and ether connected. matters, directed the Ccmmittee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to H - . the order dated 19.06.2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government and others) and order dated 13.03.2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 o? 2008 (State of . Ghhattisgarh & others Vs. Baijnath Manda! and another). Thus, this petition is squareiy covered by the judgment and order dated 31st of January, 2008 passed in WP. No. 4642/2004 Baijnath Manda! (supra) as submitted by Iearned counsei appearing for the parties. With the consent of the parties, this petition is accordingly disposed 0f in the same terms Le. the Office 0f the Advocate Genera! is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of/receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Committee shaii issue notiée to the petitioner and the officers concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shaii consider and pass order, in accordance with iaw, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The'petttioner and the officers concerned may fiie additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period of four menths from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shaii suppiy extra copy of the petition to Ms. Jain, . Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents 1 to 6 and Shri Barik, counsel for the respondent No. 9 for forwarding the same to the COmmmee. in case of griev/apce’ywith‘. regard to non—payment of pensionery dues, it is not necessary to file a writ petition before this Court irectiy. The representation/appiication can be moved before the ‘ Pension Committee as stated above. The Pension Committee shaii not refuse to entertain the representation/appiication, if so filed directly. § V i Sd/- ‘ Satish K. Agnihotrii i Judge Amit d