IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 19TH JUNE 2009 / 29TH JYAISHTA 1931 RP.No. 105 of 2006(U) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.9419/1998 Dated 14/11/2005 .................... REVIEW PETITIONR/PETITIONER ----------------------------------------------- P.M.MOHAMMED ALI, S/O.MOIDU, V/414, FRUIT MERCHANT, NEW ROAD, KOCHI-2. BY ADV. SMT.AYSHA YOUSEFF RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------------------------- 1. KERALA WAKF BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE(F), TRIVANDRUM. 3. VILLAGE OFFICER, MATTANCHERRY. 4. SIDHIQUE, S/O.V.B.K.MOHAMMED, VALIVAKATH HOUSE, MATTANCHERRY, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT EAST NADA, PERINGOTTU KARA, TRICHUR DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.P.A.ABDUL JABBAR, SC, WAKF BOARD FOR R1 SRI.M.M.SAIDU MUHAMMED,SC,WAKF BOARD FOR R1 R2 & R3 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kurian Joseph, J. ------------------------------------------ R.P.No.105 of 2006 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 19th day of June, 2009 ORDER The writ petitioner is the review petitioner. The writ petitioner was relegated to pursue his grievance before the Wakf Tribunal in the nature of the dispute raised in the writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there may be a direction to the Wakf Board to take a decision on the request of the petitioner. But, in the nature of the request made in Ext.P3, necessarily a decision has to be taken by the Wakf Tribunal with regard to the title and ownership of the property and the building. In view of such a dispute involving the 4th respondent requiring adjudication, the petitioner was relegated to pursue the remedy before the Wakf Tribunal. Thus there is no error apparent on the face of the record and there is nothing to be reviewed in the judgment. It is for the petitioner, if so advised, to pursue the remedy before the Wakf Tribunal. Review petition is hence dismissed. Kurian Joseph, Judge vns