IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 14th day of November, 2011 1st Bail Application No.1002 of 2011 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE 1- Premwati W/o Surendra R/o Gohawar P.S. Noorpur Distict Bijnor, U.P. 2- Swati W/o Subhash R/o Pakhanpur P.S. Nagina District Bijnor. ………Applicants Versus tate of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party S Arising out of Case Crime No. 9 of 2011, Under Section 364, 365 of .P.C. Police Station- Kalagarh District –Pauri Garhwal. I Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, present for the applicants. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State. Heard. Applicants Premwati and Swati, who are in jail in connection with Crime No. 9 of 2011, relating to offences punishable Under Section 364, 365 I.P.C., Police Station- Kalagarh, District Pauri Garhwal, have sought their release on bail. Both the applicants are women. Co-accused Deepak has already been directed to be released on bail. Learned counsel for the applicants pointed out that complainant Vidhan Singh has himself filed an affidavit before the Sessions Judge, stating 2 that he is not sure whether the child was kidnapped by the applicants. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion, as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicants deserve bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicants Premwati and Swati, be released on bail on their executing personal bond by each one of them and furnishing two sureties for each one of them, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kotdwar. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 14.11.2011 JM