CW 2303/09 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH [1] S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2303/09 Pramod Kumar Suiwal Versus State & Ors. [2] S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2304/09 Gyan Prakash Jat Versus State & Ors. [3] S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2305/09 Sher Singh Versus State & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 17/11/2009 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Govind Sharma, for petitioner Mr. N.A. Naqvi, AAG, for respondents *** Instant petitions have been filed by present petitioners who had participated in the selection process initiated by the respondents for the post of Prabodhak in pursuance of advertisement dt.31st May, 2008, which is included in the Schedule appended to Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008. Under the Scheme of Rules, apart from academic qualification, 5 yrs. of continuous teaching experience of a recognized educational institution/educational project is the condition of eligibility. Indisputably, the petitioners are not holding experience of 5 yrs. from any recognized educational institution/project which is the requirement under the Rules, 2008. CW 2303/09 [2] Counsel for petitioner submits that R.40 empowers the appointing authority to relax rules relating to age or regarding requirement of experience if there is any undue hardship in particular case. Suffice it to say that no such representation was made by the petitioner seeking relaxation in experience to the appointing authority, who is at liberty to exercise its power under R.40 of the Rules. Similar issue raised has also been decided by Co-ordinate Bench at the Main Seat, Jodhpur in CWP No.3902/08, Tripti Shrimali Vs. State & Ors., vide judgment dt.4th August, 2008. Since petitioners are not holding minimum qualification required under the Rules and indisputably being ineligible to participate in the selection process initiated by the respondents in pursuance of advertisement dt.31st May, 2008, their candidature has rightly been rejected. This court find no substance to interfere in the instant petitions and the same, are, accordingly, dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA2303CW09 17-11.doc