IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 10714 of 2008 Between: The Fishermen Cooperative Society, Dharmajipet Dubbak Mandal, of Medak District, rep by its Sri Goute Pedda Yellaiah, S/o.Late Sri Rajaiah, Occ:Fishermen R/o.Dharmajipet village, Dubbak Mandal, of Medak District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner of Fisheries, Government of AP Mastya Bhavan, Shantinagar, Hyderabad 2 The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Medak District at Medak 3 The Fisheries Development Officer, Siddipet Medak District .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in issuing the impugned order vide his letter No.492/C/2007-1 dated 17.3.2008 ordering the fishing order dated 3.12.2007 in Abeyance as illegal, arbitrary unjust and unconstitutional besides being contrary to the provisions of ACST Act 1964 and the rules therein while issuing consequential direction to the respondents to revoke the fishing order dated 3.12.2007 issued by the respondent No.3 forthwith in the interest of justice in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.D.GOVERDHANACHARY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR FISHERIES The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH W.P.No.10714 of 2008 ORDER: 1 . The writ petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2 in issuing the impugned order vide his letter No. 492/C/2007-1 dated 17.3.2008, wherein the orders dated 3.12.2007 are kept in abeyance, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 3 . It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that aggrieved by the impugned letter dated 17.3.2008, the writ petitioner filed a revision under Section 77 of the A.P.C.S. Act, 1964 before the first respondent, but he did not entertain the same. However, the petitioner society filed the revision by sending it through registered post on 9.5.2008. So far, no interim relief has been granted. 4. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the filing of the revision, I feel it just and proper to direct the first respondent to dispose of the revision filed by the writ petitioner, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The writ petition, is accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs. ________________ G.CHANDRAIAH,J Date:14-05-2008 Note: C.C. tomorrow B/o. Stp ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}