&0$ •Ui i,^&P&! iwn BU 1nl J, PETITI Ramkrishna Verma, S/o. Late Shri M.L. Verma, aged about 36 years, Occupation- Private Job, R/o. Block Number 117-C Risali Sector Bhilai Nagar, Distt.- Durg, (C.G.) [^ 1. 3. 4. Staie of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Technical Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, ) Mantralaya Raipur, District - Raipur, (C.G.) Chairman, Ali Sndia Council for Technicai Education, 7th Fioor, Chanderlok Building, Janpath, NewDelhi, 110001. Chancellor, C.G. Swami Vivekanand Techhieal University, Raj Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.) . Vlce-Chancellor, C.G. Swaml Vivekanand Technical University, Sector-8, Bhilainagar, BhiSai, Tahsil and District - Durg, (C.G.) Shri BP Singh, counsei for the petiti Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Government State/respondent No.1. >'h The fo!lowing.,:praer of the Court was passed A Leamedcounsel forthe partjesare heard on admission. 2) Petitioner Ramkrishna Verma has filed this writ petiti styled as 'Public Interest Litlgation' for the foitowing reiiefs: ^s.;. •• ]B!S; !C "10.1 That the respondent No. 1 and 2 may kindly be directed. to impose immediate restriction on commerciaiization of Ensineerinfl and Technical Education Colleges so they not charge excess fees from the Students.more than the fee whatsoever has been fixed bythe State Government. 10.2 That the respondents may kindly be directed to take the legal action against the colleges who are not followed the basic norms as prescribed by AICTE regarding the mandatorydisclosure as per Chapter 16. 10.3. That the respondents may kindly be directed to issue the direction to the colleges to appoint the professors. Assistant Professors and Lecturers as per AICTEnorms as defined under Chapter.No. 17. 10.4 Thattne respondent No. 3 mayikindly be directed tp appoint the Vice Chancellor for Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical Universlty as per psra 12 of the CSVTUAct. 10.5 That the respondent No.1 may kindly be directed appoint the Registrar for Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University as per para 17 of the CSVTU Act. 10.6 Any other relief which this Hon'bls Court may deem fit and proper may also bc passed." 3) In our opinion, it would be appropriate for the petitioner to approaeh respondent No.2 Chairman, Ali india Council for Technical Education, 7 Floor, Chanderlok Building, Janpath, New Delhi, 110 001, for the redressal of the grievances projected inthewrit petition. the above observation, the writ petition stands -disposed of. 5) The security amount of Rs.5, )etitioner bs refunded to the petitioner. Sd/- ChiefJustic padms Sd/- SunUKumarSinha Judge