IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CASE NO.: C.R. No.3024 of 2003 DATE OF DECISION: April 20, 2009 INDERJIT BHALLA ...PETITIONER VERSUS VISHWA MITTER ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA. PRESENT: MR. KANWALJIT SINGH, SR. ADVOCATE WITH MR. HARVINDER SINGH, ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER. NONE FOR THE RESPONDENTS. ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel submits that as per his oral telephonic call with the petitioner, a compromise has been arrived at between the petitioner (Landlord) and the respondent (tenant). He further submits that although he has asked the petitioner to give it in writing as to whether a compromise has been arrived at between them or not, but he has not received the same. Therefore, in case the averments made by him are incorrect, then he may be given liberty to file an application for revival of the revision petition. In view of the statement made by Sh. Harvinder Singh, counsel for the petitioner, the revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. In case the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner is incorrect, he may file an application for revival of the revision petition within a period of one month from today. April 20, 2009 (ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA) Gulati JUDGE