IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2009 / 20TH SRAVANA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 923 of 2009(S) ------------------------------ (JUDGMENT IN W.P.C.NO.32247/2006) PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- P.P.POULOSE, S/O.UTHUP PAILY, 57 YRS., REVIEW BUILDING, KURUSADI JUNCTION, NALANCHIRA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. (MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S.PALANATTIL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY) BY ADV. SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN RESPONDENT(S): 5TH RESPONDENT ----------------------------- SRI.ALEX, NAME OF FATHER NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.W.D.DIVISION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------------- Cont.Case (C)No.923 of 2009 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of August, 2009 JUDGMENT The writ petitioner was only granted liberty to pursue his grievances, if any, before the Government or the civil court. The complaint is that the petitioner has not been paid the bill amounts. But I do not find any positive direction in the judgment to pay the petitioner the amounts. Therefore, in case the grievance of the petitioner is that despite approaching the Government no steps are taken, the remedy is not contempt. He has to work out his remedy in other appropriate proceedings. The contempt case is hence dismissed. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) ahg. KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ----------------------------------- Cont.Case (C)No.923 of 2009 ----------------------------------- JUDGMENT 11th August, 2009