IN THE HONOURABLE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE AT BItASPUR WRIT PETI'FION N0. 3 -Ls / 2002. t PETmoNER; ^y 'Ol.^gcmira Soaakar S/o Sbri Scna. LaL, aged abpttt 40 yeara, 02,JSatg Bibuari @ Kurgilal S/o Monnhflli, aged /'' about35 yeara, ^-^ OS.Siai^oA Kuinar S/o Ramadbar, e®sdabout 35 yeara, , 04.1ahwardeen S/o Ranga-atep, agsd sibout 48 years. ^U. S/o Wafd No.S of Mumcipal Couucil: Maneudr^ar, Disfc Koria, Qlhfltti^eirh]. Versus RESPONDENTS: .<••'' ^ ^/^•/ ^M/ /7-^' -c'? Ol.Stafce qf Chbaitfci^arH fhrou^i: its TMncipal Secretary, DepL af Reirenue, Stabe Secretariat, D.K.S. Eiaawan, Raqnir, Clibattiagarh. 02.1ftaou c£ludia, Thiough it's Secretary, Depfc of Railn?ays> Ccntral Secretariat, Nfew DeBri. 03.South EaBtem RflihsEy, Zone- BOflspur, Throu^l it'a Officer-in-charge, Bilaspur, C.G. 04.Sectiou. 'Qagoevx (TOxrlcs), South Easteru RaibssEys, Manendragarh, Diafc Koria, C.G. "£- Writ Pedtion under article 226 ofthe constitudon ofladia. XI-HC-22 sil^t'qn [qiiqi <i-t(^l 9^*it^ ^i <t |ll»!lltKJi :lll':s!»BS!t«a^ ~3^ •<<i<<iff!<, ®fliwre,ra^lRCp: *<11CTI g»*<l<»LU.-. --....5l£- '2— 3II^?T ^'CTt'^R ^tt?a 29/03/2003 cozinsjel Shri Rajkamal Singh, Shri Raabir Singh, GA for Shri Abhishek Siaha, In view of the UmitBd natuite tllie couadel wirit in fhis writ petition, the Court would be served ia keepmg tfae be disposcd of at the admis^ic directions ia tfae Ught of order pa^i of 2002 ( Rukmani aad othere othcra ) dccidcd ou 02/09/2002. Praycr in ttus writ pctitiio^i respondents no.2, 3 and houses/buildings ia Ward ManindragaA, Dist. Korea,C,G.| aUotment of land to the REuhvayjs and ofhers have put up dweltmg It is the case of fhc p^ occupation of dttferent parccls o| cbl^frf^i'iFi ^l^^if'^ islt<Jl ^.F<nt$i< ^Tsif^naB^r for the petitioner. xespondent no. 1/State. for the respondente 2 to 4. of the contTovcrsy iavolved feela that no useful purpose ijrit petition pending as it can jion sts^e with appropriate (sed ia Writ Petition No. 16 YS. State of Chhattisgarh and is for a directiDn to the not to deniolash their plo.5, Miuucipal Council, The fiufher prayer fhat fhe over which fhe petitioxKTS iliuts be cancellcd. •titk»ners that they are in tend over which fhey ha<w ^i&^fe^ —2-~ XI-HC-22 3i1^I'qil (<•<{+ sn^r ^*) ^Eia |(!ta:'['agni .* ~s^ -^Wlvi^, a-nlwi®,fafii'yy ^ .^. IWMI wqrai ^- 3D^[ ;?^iii^< ^i^ct "i^- fatul' biult dwelling luuts. Their accordmg to the petitioners, sinc^ aad as such they have perfectejd question by adverse possession. ffaat the Raihvay Admuustration| is lyiag to dispossess fhem OT^ whereof is Amiexure P/1. I<i petifioners that siuce ftiey have land for the last niauy many right to evict them. and that at foicibly without foUowing aiid cstablishcd by law. According to the Railway have encroacbed upon the Adinuustration aud have Ifliiid units/structures which being obstructioii/nuisance. It is parallel to the railroay track purposc of expansion aad <bW{ct41'l ttlUcif •?ftt^ <t<n*$i< 1;'3lftl*I SII^T luly has been in occupatioa, e fhe last tfaree to four decades their title over the land in It is averred by fhe petitioacrs |wl(hout any rhyme or reasoa fhe basis of a notice, copy is the turther case of the tteen ia occupation for tfac said y^ars, the Aufhoritjes have no rate they cannot be evlcted in .breach of fhc procediuc a|ly j^duunutration flxe petitioncrs belongiag to the Railway p^lt up teniporaiy dweUing ne^r the raUway track is causing furfl^er averred tfaat tihe land beiag h^s to be kept vacant fer the Iayi4g down additional track and •'Tinj' XI-HC-22 sn^r^r R-li°b 311^1 sbtn^i -yfea i;B ''iwaM "^Si TS? ••tll'illd'4, Otil'y'is, (qwiyy ^ IWCTI W*<l<ft "WS5. 200'52—- 3iitH'Rmw'Hf?g that apart, safe distaace has to the track to avoid any nusbap. Authorities have tnne and agaa| 'hWlct'iB*! •HWdl'4 Es'3 At^K. ^ SlPOT 3II^[ be inaTntained on eifher side of I It is farther avenped that tfae reqiiested the petitk»ners and other iUegal encroachers to va<tate fhe area in question, but duc to poUtical iuterference of li^cal persons, difBcuBy is toeiag faced ia gettiag fhe area vacated|. In the process, an Assistant Divteional Engiuccr was manliajadled by ttie encroachers aad one Ramanuj Agarwal for w1u.ch FIR No.42/2002 dated 04/02/2002 was lodgcd at Polijse Station. That apart, ( it is avcrred) fhe District adininisl^ation iastead of assisting the Raihvay Adiaitustration has, proccedii^s undcr Section 145 < of M.P. L.R. Code against the Rjailway Officials at the instance of tfae encroachers. It was ijiccordit^ly subnutted by fhe teamed counsel for fhe Railw^y Adnriiustration fhat it has becoine necessaiy to evict the ^ was issued to fhe petitioners on . tfac contraiy, initiated Ir.P.C., and under Sccton 250 ncroachers for whicli a notice tcqiuring fhem. and ott»rs to reinove the encroaclimeat, faitinj^ wluch they would be evicted. ^^^f^^ w^ ,u SU, -"::14.,. 'SS^KSSX sss-S BI^H.SH fc-ti* ai^r ^tw^ ttiia hiaasiii1"*'^5 tesf.^. Wi<< ^a»Witl """"'""""""'""B^. 200 3)1$;?[-?®HWBfef lUar -^- Having heard teamed cacuinstaaces ofthe case, the C<>urt contentions raised, in partici^lar petitioneis have perfected their| question by adverse possessiou ^ bc adjudteated upon in these fh.e grievance of the writ petitione^s evicted without takir^ recourse tcj law has force. However, ownership/title of the land, conunon law forum. cotinsel aad in tfae fects and Lcarned counscl for thc IRaflway Adminfatcation also subnutted that action wiU be taketi onlv in accordance with law and fhat fhe petitioxiers should hi wfll be forcribly evicted. In the above view of the opinion (hat in the facts and cujcuxastaaces petitioners should file a repty to _whk~h fhe petitioners shaU apifrear before fhe aDprooriate < dct4)-< *iw^! 'tftA tRwsii. ^•SjfiOTSSll^l is of fhe opfaiion fhat the tfae one whether the titfc over thc suit iand in ^re the inatters which cannot prc(ceedm^. Be that as it may, that thev cannot be forcibly fhe procedure estrfilishjed by ^s regards their claim for th^y sas tee to approach the ^ve no apprehension fbat they iinatter, the Court is of the cujcuxastaaces of fhe case, tbe flhe notkx servcd on thcm for ^E^^^ -5~- li:-'.' .xBffie^s 311^1 ^l Ki-ft!* attl^lf so*<ito ^rf?a •^^ t>:]B'ti':!lil:'"s ^'f;"" •'' '^^^^^^^'^ssss^y'^'ss^^s^- ^":s^^s^>E^^^^?-^E^^':^j :^s?fQ«ti^<it®!Sa*BB, »((*ICTI stc-ti'o "WI. 2Bff 3(1$U ^tellWHfeT in&tter M.W.P.No.677/2002 for v^ I.A.No.2166/2003 for ui^ent I eslfflfe^il^ •ci l^^: FS.^; ^-^f< ^'3I^R 311^1 -5- authorily on 19/04/2003 sa^d fhereafter tbe auttioritfes shaB pniceed to dispose of the after bearing the petitmnersj will not be evictcd otherwise fban in course of law. in accordance with law aiad per the As/undcrtaking, the petitioners Wifh the aforesaid obs^rvations and directions, thte writ •petition staads'- dispo^ed of. Consequenfty, cating the interim order and icarmg also stand disposcd of. Sd/- P. C. Naik Judge