1 (WP1075/10) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1075 OF 2010 Babu Lalpratapsingh Udaypalsingh and another .... Petitioners. V/s Sham Sunder Shetty and others .... Respondents. Mr. S.R. Bhalekar for the Petitioners. Mr. Rajesh S. Datar for Respondent No.9. CORAM: V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : 9th August, 2011 P.C.:- 1. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order passed by the Executing Court in the obstructionist proceedings which have been initiated by the Petitioners. By the said order, notice taken out by the Petitioners for direction, directing the Respondent No.9 to pay interim compensation has been rejected by the Trial Court. Trial Court has observed that the status of the obstructionist is yet to be decided and, therefore, at this stage, it is not possible to grant the application filed by the Petitioners herein. 2. I do not see any infirmity in the said order and, therefore, it is not possible to interfere with the said order 2 (WP1075/10) while exercising jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Writ Petition is dismissed. Hearing of the obstructionist notice, however, is expedited. Trial Court shall decide the same within a period of six months. All contentions are kept open. (V.M. KANADE, J.)