IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3897 of 2010 1. KISHUN SINGH S/O LATE NOKHI SINGH R/O VILL.- KANCHANPUR, P.S.- BIDUPUR, DISTT.- VAISHALI 2. BISHUN SINGH S/O LATE NOKHI SINGH R/O VILL.- KANCHANPUR, P.S.- BIDUPUR, DISTT.- VAISHALI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR, DISTT.- VAISHALI 3. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR, DISTT.- VAISHALI 4. THE CIRCLE OFFICER BIDUPUR, DISTT.- VAISHALI 5. RAM NANDAN SINGH S/O LATE GOVIND SINGH R/O VILL.- KANCHANPUR, P.S.- BIDUPUR, DISTT.- VAISHALI ----------- 02. 08.03.2010 After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner has chosen to withdraw this application with liberty to challenge the findings recorded under orders dated 21.12.2009 and 10.9.2004, Annexure-1 and 2 by filing civil suit on the ground that order dated 10.9.2004, Annexure-2 was passed by the Collector, Vaishali on the basis of a compromise to which petitioner no.1 was not a party, although from perusal of the compromise petition it appears that his purported signature has been obtained over the same fraudulently. Petitioner no.2 was not a party to the proceeding at all. In the title suit petitioners are also permitted to pray for injunction in the event their possession over the lands in question is threatened by private respondent no.5. With the liberty aforesaid this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. Rajesh/ ( V. N. Sinha, J.) 2