CWP no. 12710 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP no. 12710 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on : 14-11-2011 Sangeeta Yadav ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sunil Nehra, Sr. DAG, Haryana MAHESH GROVER, J It is not disputed that the instant case is covered by the ratio of judgment rendered in CWP no.4587 of 2011 titled as Naresh Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & Others decided on 5.8.2011 wherein this Court has observed as follows:- “In the light of above observations, all the petitioners are directed to appear before respective authorities, who have issued show cause notices with their response on 23.8.2011. The authority concerned shall transmit the cases to the Director on or before 30.8.2011, for appearance before the Director on 05.09.2011. If the Director faces any difficulty because of any commitment, he may authorize Joint Director/Deputy Director to hear the cases. All these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to appear before the respective authorities which have issued show cause notice in each case. CWP no. 12710 of 2011 (O&M) 2 The said authorities, after obtaining replies of the respective petitioners to the show cause notice, shall forward the case to the Director, Education School, by fixing a date of hearing before the Director in consultation with the Director. The Director, School, thereafter, would afford due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and pass an order in accordance with law. The petitioners shall be at liberty to raise all the pleas that they may wish to urge against the proposed action. Needless to mention that the Director would keep in mind the observations made by Ist Division Bench in Tilak Raj's case (supra). The petitioners would be at liberty to impugn any order passed by the Director in accordance with law. If any of the petitioner makes a request for being represented by a counsel, the same shall be considered by the Director and appropriate order made thereon. The interim order passed in favour of the petitioners shall continue till the date of decision by the Director. The writ petitions are, accordingly, disposed of.” In view of the aforesaid, instant petition is disposed of in the same terms. Before parting with the order it is to be noticed that the petitioner was not granted any interim order against termination of her services. In this eventuality, if the order of termination has already been enforced and the prayer is only limited to adjustment, then the case of the petitioner shall be considered in the light of this limited aspect only. November 14, 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge