IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.19102 of 2011 Date of Decision.13.10.2011 Pawandeep Singh, Contractor, son of Shri Gurmukh Pal Singh, #614/R, Model Town, Jalandhar .....Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab through its Principal Secretary, Department of Irrigation, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr.Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the legal notice (Annexure P-3), which has been issued on behalf of the petitioner claiming the amount for the works done, is considered by respondent No.4 and appropriate decision is taken regarding the payment. Having regard to the fact that there is an admission of liability by the respondents for the work done by the petitioner, respondent No.4 shall issue an order of payment within 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 2. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 13, 2011 Pankaj*