MP 1 WP1656_11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1656 OF 2011 Rajkumar Mahadeo Kavade ... Petitioner Versus Prakash Dnyneshwar Gaikwad ... Respondent Mr. A. A. Joshi for Petitioner. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2011 P. C. : The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that by way of amendment, the petitioner only wanted to amplify the facts which are already stated in the plaint. 2. In view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Vidyabai and others Vs. Padmalata and another reported in 2009 (2) SCC 409, no error could be found with the order impugned in rejecting the application for amendment. Rejected. 3. In any event, if the petitioner has laid down the foundation in the written statement, he can always lead the evidence in support of the same. (B.R. GAVAI, J)