IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 19TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 30TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 5461 of 2008(A) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- SAFE DEVELOPMENT ALMS TRUST, MELAMURI, PALAKKAD. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE AND CHAIRMAN SRI.P.V.HASSAN, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.P.V.MOHAMMED. BY ADV. SMT.SUMATHI DANDAPANI(SR) SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.5461/08 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE MASS PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE PETITIONER TRUST. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FOR PERMIT DT.5.11.2007 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3a: TRUE COPYOF ROUGH SKETCH OF ROUTE. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF PROCEEDING DT.18.12.2007 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DT.5.2.08 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 10.2.2008 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT DT.5.2.2008 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 5461 OF 2008 A ==================== Dated this the 19th day of February, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner's complaints are two fold. 2. One is that by Ext.P4, the petitioner was granted regular permit subject to settlement of timing. Ext.P4 is dated 18/12/2007 and it is contended that timing conference has not been held so far. Having regard to the grant in favour of the petitioner by Ext.P4, I direct that the timing conference shall be convened by the respondents as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within eight weeks of production of copy of this judgment. 3. The other complaint of the petitioner is in regard to the non consideration of Ext.P7 application for temporary permit. From the receipt attached to Ext.P7, it is seen that the petitioner has made application on 11/2/2008. If Ext.P7 has been received by the respondents, respondents shall take up, consider the same and pass orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at any rate WPC 5461/08 :2 : within two weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp