IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13385 of 2008 RAM PRASAD MANJHI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 09.11.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. It is submitted that the petitioner desires to represent against the order of his reversion dated 2.4.2008 in context of certain orders of this Court with regard to what is stated to be similarly situated persons in CWJC No. 2217 of 2006 and analogous cases. Counsel for the State rightly submits that whether the petitioner was similarly situated as those on whose order he relies is a matter of fact to be examined by the authorities in accordance with law. If the petitioner files a representation let the same be considered and disposed off by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into merits of the matter and all issues of fact and law remain open for consideration by the respondents in its entirety to be exercised in accordance with law. The writ application stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)