1 402.11 SQP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.402 OF 2011 Niranjan Prakash Ambekar ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents ...... None for Petitioner. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1. ...... CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATED:- DECEMBER 20, 2011. P.C. 1. None appears for the petitioner. Learned A.P.P. states on instructions that Ranjit Shetty one of the Directors of Respondent No.2 has already been granted bail by the concerned Court and he is complying with the conditions imposed in the bail order meticulously. On the earlier occasion, the grievance of the petitioner was about the inaction of the local Police Officer in not arresting the said Ranjit Shetty. That issue stands redressed in terms of the statement made by the learned A.P.P. 2. Further, the relief claimed in this Petition is to direct the respondent No.1 to act upon the production warrant and arrest all the accused. Learned 2 402.11 A.P.P. states that the production warrant has been issued only against Ranjit Shetty and Manoj Vighe-accused No.6. So far as accused No.6 is concerned, he has been arrested and is in Arthur Road jail in connection with C.R.No.74/2007. As regards the present case, from the Roznama dated 11th May, 2007, it appears that accused No.6 is already released on bail. In this view of the matter, the main relief claimed in this Petition is worked out. 3. The only relief that remains to be considered is direction against the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Thane to complete the proceedings as soon as possible. We are not inclined to issue any direction in that behalf. The petitioner is free to approach the concerned Court and make request for early hearing, which request will be considered on its own merits. 4. Petition disposed of accordingly. (R.G.KETKAR, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)