ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 5260 OF 1994 PETITION NO. 5260 OF 1994 PETITION NO. 5260 OF 1994 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.A.P.Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr.Shrikant Yadav for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 23rd March, 2009 : 23rd March, 2009 : 23rd March, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Not on board. Mentioned. In view of urgency taken on board. 2. The parties have arrived at the compromise and accordingly filed the consent terms dated 23rd March, 2009. The same is signed by the Petitioner and the Respondent through Power of Attorney Holder. It is also signed by the respective advocates. The consent terms is taken on record and marked "X" for identification purpose. 3. According to the Advocates, the consent terms is well within the ( 2 ) framework of law and the record. There is no objection of any kind about the identification and the signatures in question. 4. The Petition is accordingly disposed of pursuance to this consent terms. No costs. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.] V. MOHTA, J.]