IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 7TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 18TH MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 3823 of 2011(C) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- DANESH KUMAR T., 38 YEARS, S/O.LATE THAMBAN NAMBIAR, THATTALANGARA HOUSE, PATTUVAM AMSOM /DESOM, THALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN SRI.G.GIREESH RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT AND CHAIRMAN, KERALA COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (A) DEPARTMENT, SASTHRA BHAVAN, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004. 2. PATTUVAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, PATTUVAM, KANNUR-670143. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P.(C) No. 3823 of 2011 C ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 7th day of February, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner complains that when he made an application for a building permit, that application was rejected by the Panchayat, acting upon Ext.P4 issued by the first respondent to the effect that the land in question is classified as CRZ III. According to the petitioner, this classification is erroneous and that the same has been done without conducting any enquiry. It is complaining of the above, the writ petition is filed. 2. In my view, if at all the petitioner has any grievance against the classification made by the first respondent, the course open to the petitioner is to have brought such alleged error to the notice of the first respondent itself. It is seen from the pleadings that the petitioner has not taken recourse that remedy and on the other hand, has filed this writ petition. 3. Therefore, I leave open to the petitioner to move W.P.(C) No.3823/2011 : 2 : the first respondent and bring to their notice the alleged erroneous classification of this property and I direct that if such an application is made, that will be dealt with by the first respondent, after conducting necessary enquiry and as expeditiously as possible. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) aks // True Copy // P.A. To Judge