(1) WP. 460.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.460 OF 2010 Yashwant Meghshyam Mahajan .. Petitioner VERSUS The Chairman/Administrator, Savda Faizpur Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha M. Savda and others .. Respondents Mr. A.G. Talhar, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V.B. Patil, Advocate for the respondent no.1 ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 24TH JUNE, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1] Heard learned counsel. 2] The petitioner filed dispute regarding settlement of accounts, rendition thereof and for injunction. 3] The co-operative credit society, has obtained certificate under section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 against the petitioner. Purport of the dispute is to stall the recovery proceedings of the amounts which are determined and that the petitioner is entitled to claim deduction in the interest amount etc. It is (2) WP. 460.2010 pertinent to notice that the petitioner did not claim any particular sum from the co-operative credit society. Having regard to explanation 2(1) appended to section 91 of the M.C.S. Act, the dispute is not maintainable since it is not filed for recovery of any debt or demand due to credit society. The learned counsel for the respondent no.1 society states that already certificate under section 101 of the M.C.S. Act is challenged by filing revision and the revision Petition is under consideration before the competent authority. The revisional Court is competent to consider whether the interest is excessively charged and whether the amounts shown in the account against the petitioner is correct. It is not that the revisional Court cannot go into such aspect in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction. In this view of the matter, the impugned order is not found to be arbitrary or perverse. Petition is therefore disposed of. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp