'^"i; ^••••" v« ..-•-"^.S&'P^ 2^\.^;-^%;^' .^^s-^^" ,C^A'"."\yA'" •S \vy^..>"~ ,** 1 ^ IN THE mGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR GHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION (S) N0. ——t-U-/2009 Shivnarayan Patle, S/o- Shri Shiv Dayal Patle, Aged about 40 years, R/o- LIG,11, Shiv Mandir, Housing Board Colony, Devrikhurd, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS 1. State ofChliattisgarh, Through-Secretary, Departnient ofPublic Works, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Engineer in Chief, Department ofPubUc Works, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 3. Superintendent Engineer, Department ofPublic Works, Bridge Construction Division, Raigarh, District-Raigarh, Chliattisgarh. Executive Engineer, Department ofPublic Works, Bridge Coi^truc^ion Division, Raigarh, District-BSl^Br^hhattisgarh. 5. Shri Maliirlal Diwakar, S/o- Not known to the Petitioner, Aged about - Not known to the Petitioner, Through-Superintendent Engineer, Department ofPublic Works, Bridge Construction Division-Raipur, C.G. 6. Shri Krishna Kumar Dhruv, S/o- Not known to the Petitioner, Aged about - Not known to the Petitioner, Through-Superintendent Engineer, Department ofPublic Works, Bridge Construction Division-Raipur, C.G. PETITIONER RESPONDENTS \\ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WMT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI ETC. i~Fr"' U^;~ILJ wl"fi 53T r^s^ r'1^ "E ^"»^*i'\i ^-'f ^?0i—i.?~l.i \^^ ^^ ^-.l"*li..^ a ?*^? U A£'lJ?^ii^ ISGARM : Bi-AS") ?-^" ?n"i^^l*¥*?<hfll^.-"^^i ^ /?fa.'li ?T. E (*p^_ ?"r .4 ~?Z7 ifl ^"^1?°" -^•^''.-^.^'l WRiT PETITiON (S) N0. 5471 OF 2009 PETITiONER Shivnaravsn Patie RESPONDENTS vsrsus State of Chhsttssgarh & Others iWrit oetition under Art'cie 226 of the Constitution of indis) Sinaie Bench : Hon'ble Shri Saiish K. Agnihotri, J. -lr^<s:.j£.n- Gowrl ent:- Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, couns&l for ths petitioner. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia. Dv. Go\i. Advocsts forthe State. s^R :mPA V.T'! •'iia^Snttt ^l s.>rf*J '..'"tt—^ ('Pssssd on this 24 dsiv of S©otAtnbsf.2QOQ) With the consent of iearned counse! aRpearing for the garties, the osnison 5s nsaro TaHaisV. Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the Detitioner does not want to contest this petition on merits at this staas and oravs that the petitioner mav be permitted io make a representation to the respondent-autiioritjes to consider his case v/ith'in stipuiafed tln-ie. Lsarned counsel aopearina for the Stats submits {hat in the event, the petitioner makes a representation, the same shail be consldered and declded. in accordance with iaw and on its own meriis, as expeditiousiy as possible. In view of foregolng, according to the learned counsei appearing for the petitioner, nofhing sun-'ives in this petition for adjudlcatio". Accordingly, ihe writ petition is d'smissed ss witharswn with the aforesaidiiberty. ^—— —— - - Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge