IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKk AT BANGALORE Dated this the 18th iay of June 1998 BFORE THiS HON BLE MR. JUSTICE CHD6HEKARiIAH RIT PETITION NO.17875/1998 Between: Sri Sohanlal, Son of Shri Misrilal, major 1 residing at No.1153 — 1154, Sindhanoor, Rajchur ist., Karnataka State. ...PETITIONER (By Sri,Breeatsa Associates, Adv,) And: 1, The Sindhanoor Town Municipal Council, Sindhanoor, Raichur District, Karnataka State. 2. The Chief Officer, Siadhanoor Town Municipal Council, Sindhanoor, Raichur District, Karnataka State, ,..RESPONDENTS (By Sr.Ashok Hernahalli, Adv.) S S 5 5 This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to quash the warrant dated 25.03,1998 vide Annexure ‘B’, . . .2 A —2— This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary nearing this day, the Court made the following: OiDER The petitioner claiming to be the pwner of tiie property has filed this Writ Petition cha— lienging the order of atachrnent issued by the Municiality on the ground that no notice waS issued to him. The contention of the petitioner that he is the owner of the property ws not accepted by the Court in ‘the suit in O,S.No. 157/1984 filed by the petitioner. when such being the case, the petitioner is liable ‘to pay the rent due to tne respondents. A&nittedly, the petitioner ha not paid the rent in respect of the property which is said to oe in riis possession. In view of this, the Municipal Council is right in attaching the properties as per Annexure ‘B • Therefore, this is not a case which calls for interference by this • • • 3 -3- Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indid. Accordingly 0 this rit petition is rejected, Sd! 3UDGE