IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH JULY 2009 / 7TH SRAVANA 1931 RCRev..No. 121 of 2003() ------------------------ RCA.87/2000 of ADDL. DISTRICT COURT-II, KOZHIKODE RCP.22/1998 of MUNSIFF COURT, NADAPURAM .................... REVISION PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VATTAMPOYIL SHAILAJA W/O. LATE DOCTOR DAYANANDAN, PAZHANKUTTATHIL HOUSE EYYAMKODE AMSOM DESOM VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 2. SUDHEESH S/O. LATE DR.DAYANANDAN, PAZHANKUTTATHIL HOUSE, EYYAMKODE AMSOM DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 3. SAMMI, D/O. LATE DR.DAYANANDAN, PAZHANKUTTATHIL HOUSE, EYYAMKODE AMSOM DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.A.AUGUSTINE(AREEKATTEL) RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT/PETITIONER ----------------------------------- KANIYANKANDIYIL MAMMU ALIAS KUNHITHARUVAYI S/O. AMMAD, PAYANTHONGIL THAZHAKUNIYIL, KURRIPPRAM AMSOM DESOM, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JJ. ------------------------------------------------- R.C.R. 121 of 2003 ------------------------------------------------- Dated: JULY 29, 2009 ORDER Pius C. Kuriakose, J. No representation for the revision petitioners. It is seen that this Court did not become incline to grant order of stay of execution in this RCR which is admitted way back in 2003. Thereafter the case was not moved even once by the revision petitioners/tenants for orders. In all probability, the RCR would have become infructuous since the buildings would have been delivered over to the decree-holder. However, in the absence of the counsel for the revision petitioners, we are inclined to dismiss the RCR for default. Accordingly the RCR is dismissed for default. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE P.Q. BARKATH ALI, JUDGE mt/-