WP(C) 4557/2008 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI The petitioner is aggrieved by an order of transfer dated 18.8.2008 by which he has been posted in Changlang district from Pasighat. According to the petitioner , he is suffering from cardiac problems and other health problems and his postin g on transfer to Changlang will work adversely to his health as in Changlang the re are no medical facilities available. On the other hand, according to the peti tioner, in Pasighat there is a General Hospital where the petitioner can obtain quick medical attention as and when necessary. In the writ petition filed the pe titioner has further stated that persons who have served for longer period than him in Pasighat have not been transferred whereas the petitioner has been single d out and transferred to Pasighat. The materials on record disclose that in this regard the petitioner has filed a representation dated 15.9.2008 to the Director of Higher and Technical Education , Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh. In the said representation, copy of which has been enclosed as Annexure -9 to the writ petition, the health problems of the petiti oner have been primarily highlighted. This Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction would be singularly ill equipped to effectively consider the precise medical condition of the petitioner and whe ther having regard to such medical condition the posting of the petitioner in Ch anglang is appropriate. This is primarily a matter for the employer to decide. A s the petitioner has already approached his employer by filing a representation dated 15.9.2008, which is yet to be disposed of, instead of entertaining this wr it petition, at this stage, it would be more appropriate to require the employer to consider and pass an order on the petitioner’s representation dated 15.9.200 8. Accordingly, the writ petition is not admitted and instead it is disposed of wit h the direction to the Director of Higher and Technical Education, Govt. of Arun achal Pradesh, to take on record the petitioner’s representation dated 15.9.2008 and pass appropriate orders thereon. Such orders may be passed at the earliest. If the petitioner is still working at Pasighat, the Court is of the view that h e be allowed to remain at Pasighat till such time that the representation of the petitioner dated 15.9.2008 is disposed of. The writ petition shall stand disposed of in the above terms.