IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 6724 of 1991. Date of Decision: 22nd May, 2009. Nirbhai Singh ....Petitioner through Mr. Lekh Raj Sharma, Advocate Versus State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab & Ors. .Respondents through Mr. Palwinder Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL) In this writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved at the order dated 9.1.1991 passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab to the extent that one regular stage carriage permit with one return trip, previously granted to the petitioner, has been cancelled. While admitting the writ petition and permitting the petitioner to operate, a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.7.1991 directed this petition to be heard along with CWP NO. 15458 of 1990 [Bhagowal Dalam Bus Service Regd. V The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab, etc. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in this case is identical to the one raised in CWP NO. 15458 of 1990 [Bhagowal Dalam Bus Service Regd. V The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab etc.] which has already been allowed by a learned Single Judge of this Court on 30.10.2001. The stand taken by learned counsel for the petitioner is not disputed by learned State Counsel also. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is allowed in the same terms as in CWP No. 15458 of 1990 [Bhagowal Dalam Bus Service Regd. V The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Punjab etc.] May 22, 2009. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE