IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13241 of 2009 Hira Lal, son of Late Kaja Lal, resident of Mohalla-Malah Chak, P.S. Jehanabad, District-Jehanabad. …………………Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Gaya Circle, Gaya. 3. Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Water Ways Division, Jehanabad. 4. Treasury Officer, Jehanabad. 5. Divisional Cashier, Water Ways Division, Jehanabad. 6. District Provident Fund Officer, Finance Department, Jehanabad. ………Respodents. ----------- 2. 12. 10. 2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that, although, dues on account of Provident Fund for the period from 1987- 88 to 2006-07 was sanctioned vide Memo No. 2306, dated 12. 12. 2007, but till date the petitioner has not received the sanctioned amount despite representing the matter. Lastly, he has represented the matter on 19. 05. 2009, as contained in Annexure-2 of the writ application. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case petitioner files a fresh representation stating details of his claim, the same shall be considered as per law without delay. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of his pending claim, petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before Respondent No. 3. In case, such representation is filed along with 2 relevant documents in support of his claim as also certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today, Respondent No. 3 shall consider and dispose of the pending claim of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the petitioner may receive the amount admissible to him without delay with statutory interest. With the above observations/directions, the writ application stands disposed of. m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)