27. cr appa 991-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 991 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 576 OF 2010 Badshah Mohansing Macharekar & Ors .. Applicants Vs The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. S.P. Thorat for the Applicants Mr. V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the State CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J DATE : 9th SEPTEMBER, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicants and learned APP for the State. 2. The applicants-original accused nos. 1 to 4 have been convicted under Section 372 read with Section 34 of IPC. The maximum sentence imposed on the applicants is five years. The appeal preferred by them against the said order has been admitted. Now, the applicants are seeking bail. 3. As far as applicant no. 2 is concerned, the prosecutrix PW 7 has specifically stated that accused no. 2 had no role to play in the incident and looking to the fact that applicant nos. 3 and 4 are ladies, I am inclined to grant 1 27. cr appa 991-10.doc bail to applicant nos. 2, 3 and 4. As far as applicant no. 1 is concerned, liberty is granted to him to prefer fresh application for bail at a later stage. Hence, the order: O R D E R 1. Applicant nos. 2 to 4 i.e 2. Satish Badshah Macharekar, 3. Salma Badshah Macharekar and 4, Bobby @ Babita d/o Sadashiv Macharekar be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- [Rs. Twenty Five Thousand Only] each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. The said Applicants shall report to the Sangamner Police Station once in a fortnight till disposal of the appeal. 2. Liberty to applicant no. 1 i.e Badshah Mohansing Macharekar to prefer separate application for bail at a later stage. 3. Application is allowed in above terms. [SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] 2 27. cr appa 991-10.doc 3