// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Restoration Appl. No.426/2008 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2878/2007 Amar Nath Anand Son of Shri Fateh Chand alias Megh Raj Versus Bhupendra Singh Son of late Shri Gurudeep Singh Date of Order ::: 21.10.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri R.M. Sharma, Counsel for petitioner None present for respondents #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The restoration application was listed before this Court on 14th October, 2008 and the learned counsel for the petitioner was directed to supply a copy of memo of restoration application to the learned counsel who was appearing for the respondent/non-petitioner in the writ petition and the Registry was directed to show his name in the daily cause-list. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has supplied a copy of memo of the restoration application to the learned counsel who was appearing on behalf of the respondent in the writ petition; his name has // 2 // also been shown in the cause-list. But, no one is present on behalf of the respondent. After considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the reasons assigned in the application, the writ petition is restored to its original number. The application for restoration accordingly stands allowed. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//