IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-36266 of 2009 Date of Decision:18.1.2010 Gurmukh Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that similarly placed co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 7.12.2009 passed in Crl. Misc. No.31654-M of 2009 (Annexure P-3). Learned State counsel on instructions from HC Nand Lal states that no other FIR with the similar allegations is pending against the present petitioner. Accordingly, bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawanshahr, in the same terms as granted to the co-accused vide order dated 7.12.2009. 18.1.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE