CRLR No.67 of 2003 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Shri B.S.Parihar, learned counsel for the revisionists. Shri G.S. Sandhu, learned G.A. for the State/respondent no.1. Shri Arvind Vashisht, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Present revision has been filed by the revisionists against the order dated 26.04.2003 passed by the Special Judge C.B.I./Anti Corruption Dehradun under Section 120 B, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C and 13 (2) read with 13 (1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, by which non-bailable warrants were issued against the revisionists. The sole ground taken by the revisionists and argued by their counsel is that since the Special Judge C.B.I./Anti Corruption Dehradun was not notified at the time of passing of the order and no Judge had been appointed for that purpose till that day and also, there was no notification to appoint Special Judge C.B.I./Anti Corruption Dehradun till that day, the order passed by the Special Judge C.B.I./Anti Corruption Dehradun, is without jurisdiction. On the other hand, Shri G.S. Sandhu, learned G.A. for the State/ respondent no.1 and Shri Arvind Vashisht, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 submitted that the submission of the learned counsel for the revisionists is totally incorrect. In support of their submission, they referred to the order passed by the learned Court, in which it is clearly mentioned that the order was passed by the Session Judge, who was Special Judge C.B.I./Anti Corruption Dehradun. In view of the fact that the order was passed by Special Judge C.B.I./Anti Corruption Dehradun, the submission of the learned counsel for the revisionists has no force and therefore, the revision is dismissed. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the trial Court for early disposal of the case. (V.K. Bist, J.) Arpan 05.12.2011