VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 1890 OF 2008 Pandurang Yashwant Raghav Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents Mr. K. R. Tiwari, for the Petitioner. Dr. F. R. Shaikh, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI, & A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 17, 2008. PC :- 1. The counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that there is some dispute of the petitioner with respondents with regard to the alleged loan amount in his name. He submits that fictitious documents have been prepared and created by the bank, although he has not taken any loan. We are not sure that any proceedings are initiated before anybody and therefore, it is difficult for this Court to issue direction, as sought in this petition. The petition is misconceived, which is accordingly dismissed. 2. If the petitioner has any grievance with respect to fabrication of any documents, he is at liberty to approach the concerned agencies. Sd/- [ BILAL NAZKI, J.] Sd/- [ A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.]