WP(C) 4413/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE I.A. ANSARI Heard Mr. P.K. Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioners. Aggrieved by orders, dated 15/9/04 and 15/10/04, passed by the learned Additiona l Deputy Commissioner, Kamrup, in Tenancy Case No.14/2004, declaring acquisition of ownership right in favour of the present petitioners, namely, Smt. Bhati Bal a Baro, Shri. Bhadreswar Baro and Shri Padmaram Baro and ordering approval there of by way of gazette notification, the private respondents herein preferred an a ppeal under Section 67 (1) of the Assam (Temporarily Settled Areas) Tenancy Act, 1971, read with Section 151 of the Assam Land Revenue Regulation Act, 1886. In the appeal, the question arose as to whether notice had or had not been serve d on the appellant, namely, Jhumarmal Jain since deceased. The learned Board of Revenue sent this service report for expert opinion, to the Forensic Science Lab oratory (in short, ’FSL’), Guwahati. During the pendancey of the appeal, the app ellant, namely, Jhumarmal Jain died and his legal representatives, who are, now, respondent Nos (a) to 3(i) were impleaded. The appeal has been allowed and the orders, dated 15/9/04 and 15/10/04, have been set aside. The grievance of the present petitioners is that they were not heard on the corr ectness or otherwise of the expert’s report, which was submitted by FSL, Guwahat i, and that the appeal was disposed of by order, dated 12/6/08, passed in Case N o.53 RA (K)/2006, without hearing them. However, a perusal of the impugned, orde r dated 12/6/08 aforementioned, shows that at para 29, the learned Board of Reve nue has observed learned advocates for both the parties are heard . It is the co rrectness of this observation, which is under challenge in the present writ peti tion made under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Considering the fact that the observations which have been quoted above, relate to what transpired during the course of the proceedings of the appeal, the remed y of the petitioners lies in applying to the learned Board of Revenue for correc tion of the records and for taking such further actions as may be warranted by l aw. In view of the above, and in the interest of justice, this writ petition is clos ed with liberty given to the petitioners to make appropriate application to the learned Board of Revenue for correction of the observation made in order, dated 12/6/08, as indicated above and do the needful in accordance with law. In terms of the above observations and directions, this writ petition shall stan d disposed of. No order as to cost.