IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.744 of 2008 JAGDISH SINGH SON OF LATE RAM SHARAN SINGH, R/O VILL. NAUSAHARA, P.S. GHOSHI, DIST. JEHANABAD. --PETITIONER/INFORMANT Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. MITRANJAN SON OF LATE NANDLAL YADAV, R/O MOHALLA- MANGLASTHAN (RAMCHANDRAPUR), P.S. LAHERI, DIST. NALANDA. 3. BINOD KUMAR SON OF SARYUG YADAV R/O VILL. BHATAHAR, P.S. THARTHARI, DIST. NALANDA AT PRESENT C/O SURESH YADAV, R/O OF MOHALLA-MURARPUR, P.S. LAHERI, AND DIST. NALANDA. ---- OPP. PARTIES. For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar no.1, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP. ----------- 03 12.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner, who is maker of the F.I.R. which gave rise to Sessions Trial no. 144 of 2005 of the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court no. I, Nalanda, is aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 26.04.2008 whereby, learned trial Court, on a consideration of the materials available on record, found that the prosecution has miserably failed to prove the charge(s) beyond shadow of all reasonable doubts. It appears that the son of the informant (PW-4) was assaulted by the accused. He has not been produced at the trial. Learned trial Court has also found that PWs 1, 2 and 3 have not supported the prosecution case. They have in fact contradicted the prosecution case. They have, thus, been declared hostile. It is admitted position that neither the doctor nor the Investigating Officer was produced on behalf of the prosecution. In the backdrop of these materials emanating from the records learned trial Court has taken a view that prosecution has failed to prove the 2 charge(s). The consideration cannot be said to be perverse or perfunctory. There is no merit in this application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)