u ^ ptes?teu^.^^'VA'"" WfHEHIGHCQURTQF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR i^ (CHHATTISGARH) W.P.No. 3 2«8/2006 SINGLE BENCK Petitioner Umesh Nayak, S/o Late Shri Bhoj Raj r Nayak, Aged about 43 years, Sub- Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur Sub-Division No.2, R/o Parijat Extension, HIG E/19, Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1) State of Chhattisgarh — Through the Secretary, Public Works Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2) The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-78 3^ •<<i<<ici<<, ®ifl'y'i<o,Riciiyy tJ.T5 '3.Z-SS/ wnnT ai^wqi • W[ 200 ^ 3ll^!flM^«tl(*i?t^al<<ff) 311^1 qiT^i+ craTsn^rshHiti c Soma f\ s^iWflf?H3n^r s-T^ooe Mr. P. Divaker, Senior Advod petitioner. Miss Deepali Pandey, Panel U copy. Heard. By the instant writ petition und the petitioner who is working as Sub-E has questioned hte transfer order dat that in the impugned tist, his name transferred showing that the transfer t\ not entitled for transfer allowance, wh for transfer. Leamed Senior Counsel for f cioes not show that the petitioner hd administrative ground and affidavit (fi that he has never reauested Tor transf In view of the above, the representation raising his grievanoes 1 and respondent No.1 shall decidethe receipt of the repressntation consi aocordance with law. Ifthe petitioner representation is decided, With the direotions aforesaid, 1 Consequently, M.(W.)P.No.2S disposed of. Parties are entitfed for certlfied <mt<'i<fl-i *iiH<rtTfftec€t<Riwi< ^ia.ri^irsn^T ate, with Mr. Adil Minhaj, Advocate, for the awyer for the State/respondents, on advance ;r Articte 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India, ^ngineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur, Ijed 30-6-2006 (Annexure P-2) on the ground pnds place at serial No.25 and he has been |as been made on his request, therefore, he is jereas, the petitioner has never made request he petitioner submits that the transfer order s been transferred in exigenoy of sen/ice on •nnexure P-3) of the petitioner has been filed (^S ar. petitioner Is aliowed to m.ake a detailed o respondent No.1 within ten days from today representation within 30 days from the date of dering the objections of the petitioner, in |s not relieved, he should not be relived, till the he petition stands disposed of. 11S/2Q06 and i.A.No.6469/2006 aiso stand copy of this order. Sd;- L.C.Bhsaoo Judge <°