PETITIONERS r t : RESPONDENTS c 7? L_ (2) H‘E'HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT 1?; BILASPUR WRIKTMPETITION (Si NO.7S7/ 12006 1k, Shankar La! Soni S/o Shri Manohar Lal Soni Age about 44 years, AssistantTeacher, Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Temri, Block - Nawagarh, Distt. - Durg (C.G.) Suresh Kumar Gautam S/o ShriTulasi Ram Gautam Age about 41 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt Hr. Sec. School, Urla, Tah. & Distt. - Durg (C.G.) VERsug : 2 State GoVernment of Chhattisgarh Through :- Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /2/; Director of Public Instructions Raipur (C.G.) /3. District Education Officer, Durg Distt. - Durg roe.) x4. District EducationOfficer, Bemetara Distt. ~ Durg ‘(C.G.) EEK WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE E CONSTITUTION OF INDIA a x 5% $ @ HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITI56ARH AT SILASPUR W. P. (s) No. 7571 of 2006 38: Hon'ble Mr‘ Justice Sotish K. Agnihatri, J Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel hwyer for the respondents/State. O R D £ R (Passed on 10*“ day of Jamar-y, 2007) The following order of the Court is passed by Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the respondents/State jointly submit that the facts of the present ease are similar to that of in W. P. (s) 5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tiwari at others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh 8: others), which was allowed Vide order dated 7*“ November, 2006. They further submit that the question of law involved is also the 7’ Same. 2. In view of the above stated sibmissions made by karned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order dated 7’“ November, zoos passed by ihis court in w. P. (s) 5976 of 2006. No order as to costs. Sd/- . Satish K.Agni‘na$ri i. Judge Bablu Petitioners i Shankur Ln! Soni and another Versus Respondenfs : Sfme Govemmen't of Chhmisgorh and others