spb/- 1 wp1103-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1103 OF 2011 Chandrakant Balkrishna Shedage ... Petitioner . V/s. Superintendent of Police & Ors. ... Respondents. --- Mr. K.S. Patil for the Petitioner. Mr. A.S.Gadkari, APP for the State. ----- CORAM : P. V. HARDAS & M.N.GILANI,JJ. DATE : 25TH APRIL, 2011. P.C. 1 Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2 By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for issuance of a writ, directing the respondents to extend parole leave granted to the petitioner from 20.04.2011 for a further period of 30 days. It appears that the petitioner was released on parole initially for a period of 30 days. At the request of the petitioner, the parole leave came to be extended for a period of 30 days and by a further period of 30 days thereafter. It appears that thereafter, the petitioner applied for extension of the parole which came to be rejected and the order, rejecting the request, came to be communicated to the spb/- 2 wp1103-11.sxw petitioner on 05.04.2011. The petitioner then two days thereafter submitted an appeal/ representation to the State Government, praying for further extension of parole. The said representation came to be submitted on 11.04.2011. In the light of the fact that the appeal/ representation is pending consideration with the Respondent -Government, according to us, the relief which the petitioner has prayed for at prayer clause (a) to the petition for granting extension of the parole leave to the petitioner cannot be entertained by this court. 3 In the light of the pendency of the appeal/representation, which is said to be pending, the learned APP states that the aforesaid pending appeal/representation would be decided by the respondent within one week from today. We accept the aforesaid statement as an undertaking to the court. 4 We accordingly, allow this petition and make the Rule absolute as indicated above with no order as to costs. [M.N.GILANI,J.] [P.V. HARDAS, J.]