giwys-K > -;, ^"^j^i, .^=6^VS s ^^-r^ l^) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl No^TSj /2006 PETITIONER Chandrabhanu Sahu, aged about ^ 32 years, S/o Shri Brijmafaan Sahu R/o Village Ranipur, Tah.sU Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS .-••\J/ ^^> °':?>^y €S^ /"'..A>:>\y .•••' 'y' v^.y .°!-• .»••' .cy .G-' ..t? o' ^D-CO^ [^^ to^ioBlro ^ The State of Chhattisgarh,/ Through Secretacy, Forest Departm.ent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur \ ' Union of India, through Secretary Forest Departinent, New Delhi Forest Range Officer, Baranw-apara (AbhyaranJ, i Distt. Raipur Divisional forest Officer," General Forest Division, Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIOS OP INDIA !K^ 1 ^ XI-HC-78 35g'airaT?pr, ®Ti1yi?,R«'iitty *TTH^II $n*iicn f^ <f<331. 0<. ^ 200 W^l ll'l* ('P^^) |e for the State/respondents No.1 , 3 & 4 unsel for respondent No.2/ Union of girafepft.T wRfr'ir'teA rf^tZR ^igi^Tsn^T an^Tqirf^ii'R asiTSTRTrgnra gRlTWnferSf^T 12.10.2006 Shri Parag Kotecha, counse! for the petitioner. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advoca on advance copy. Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, c India on advance copy. ArgumenSs heard. Order dictated as follow®: ORRL ORDER 2.10.2006) SUNiLKUhflARSINHA.J. By way of this writ petitioi Constitution of india, the petitionei filed under Article 226/227 of the i|, has prayed for issuance of certain directions to She State authorities 14 fonnulate the rules pertaining to the constitution and election of the mei^bers of Van Suraksha Samitt. Along with the said prayer, he has also pra^ed that the memo Annexure P-3, which schedules the date for election of the|office bearers of Van Suraksha Sam/ft', should also be quashed. | The subject matter of this Wr|t Petition is exactly identical to that of |the subject matters of WP No.5524) Ihave been heard and dismissed bv thi Learned counsel for the petitid IState/respondentsdoes not dispute th In view of the above, this Writ itage on {he grounds and reasons sta '2005 and-^/.P. No.5525/2006, whfch s Court vide ordere dated 10.1,0.2006. |ner as well as learned counsel for the Isfactual pcsition. Petition is also dismissed at the motion fed in orders dated 10.10.?006 passed n W.P. No.5524/2006 and W.P. No.5325/2006. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge