IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.397 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.397 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.397 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2685 OF 2002 WRIT PETITION NO. 2685 OF 2002 WRIT PETITION NO. 2685 OF 2002 Smt.Sushila R. Parikh .. Appellant Vs. Andheri Chandralok Co.op. .. Respondent Housing Society Ltd. & Ors. Dr.D.K.Choudhari for the Appellant. Mrs.Bhavana Shah for the Respondent. ----- CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. S.J.VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2006. DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2006. DATE : 11TH AUGUST, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Appeal, the Appellant is challenging the order dated 11th April, 2005 passed by the Learned Single Judge. The Learned Single Judge had declined to interfere in the above Writ Petition. On a perusal of the order dated 11th April, 2005, passed by the Learned Single Judge, we find that the Petition, which was filed in August, 2002, was dismissed for default on 21st October, 2002. Thereafter, the Petition was restored to file on 9th April, 2003. Even then, for almost for two years, the Petitioner did not bother to move the Court for getting the above Petition admitted. Ultimately, the Learned Single Judge had dismissed the same on 11th April, 2005. We do not find any error or illegality in the same. Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.) (S.J.VAZIFDAR,J.)