IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 1397 of 1983 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.C.SRIVASTAVA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- JAYABEN Versus PATEL SUMANTLAL JIVANLAL -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR MC SHAH for Petitioners MR AJ PATEL for Respondent No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for Respondent No. 2, 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE D.C.SRIVASTAVA Date of decision: 19/01/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT 1. This Civil Revision was adjourned to 16-2-2001 vide order dated 15-12-2000. Today, Shri MC Shah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri JN Patel for the respondent no.1 requested that, since the matter has been settled between the parties, orders may be passed in terms of compromise. 2. On this request, file was summoned from the office. Settlement terms have been filed today, in which, the respondent nos.2 and 3 have been discharged. As such, the compromise is between the petitioner and the respondent no.1, which is signed by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent no.1 and also by the attorney of the respondent no.1/2. Xerox copy of power of attorney has also been filed. 3. In view of this, Civil Revision is decided in terms of compromise, duly verified and filed today. January 19, 2001. [ D.C. Srivastava, J.] /sakkaf