^ Petifloners HSGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGASUi AT BiLASPUR Writ Petitjon (Art.227i No.149 of 2010 1. Smt.Saroj Devi, wife of Shri Diibagh Singh, aged about 35 years, 2. Smt.Pinky Devi, wifs of Shri Jagmindar Singh, aged about 26 years, Both residents of Pathhar Punji, Tehsi! Beria, P.0. Pathora, Districit Durg (CG) Versus State of Chhaiii^arh through the Collector of Stamps, Durg. (Writ Petition under Articie 227 ofthe Constitution of india) Mr. B.P.Sharma, counsel forthe petitioners. Mr.Sushi! Dubey, Government Advocate for the resi (SB: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Shanrna, J.) (8-11-2011) 1. By this writ peiition under Artide 227 of the Constitution of india the petitioners have chalienged the legaiity and propriety of the order dated 28.7.2009 passed by the Board of Revenue, Biiaspur, Circuit Court, Raipur, in Revenue Appeai Case No.A/'05/S.A./B-105/32/'2009, whereby the Board of Revenue has afflrmed ihe ordsr pa^ed by the >i!ector of Stamps, Durg, in Revenue Case N0.67/B-105/2005-06. Coi! 2. i have heard iearned counsel for the parttes, perused the order impugned and order passed by the Coiiector of Stamps, Durg. 3. Learned counsei appearing for both the parties frankiy admit and submit that this case is squarely covered by She decision ofihis Court passed in WriS Petition (Art.227) Ho.285 of Z)11 and other connecied matters vide order dated 5.9.201 1 and by passing the order dated 15.1.2009 the Coiiector of Stamps has not conducted inquiry for correct valuation of the property for the purpose of payment of siamp duty. -7^ ^ 4. For the foregoing reasons, the wrft petition is aiiowea'. Order dated 28.7.2009 passed by the Board of Revenue and order datad 15.1.2009 passed by the Coilector of Stamps, Durg are hsreby quashed. Case is remitted to the Coiiector of Stamps for provia'rsg comptete opportunity of hearing to the parties and to pass She order afresh. Parties are directed to rsmain presenf before the Coilector of Stamps, Durg on 15.12.2011. No order as to costs. ^ Sd/- T.P.Sharma ^ Judge