IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15405 of 2011 Ratan Lal Patel Versus Praphul Ranjan Ghosh & Ors ---------------------------------- 04. 12.10.2011. Heard the learned counsel, Sri Binod Kumar Singh, on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel, Sri J.S. Arora, appearing on behalf of the respondent. By the impugned order dated 02.06.2011 passed by Munsif Ist Patna in Title Suit No.14 of 2002, the application filed by the respondent No.7 to 11 for being added as party in the suit on the ground that during the pendency of the suit, the landlord-defendant sold the suit property to these respondent Nos.7 to 11 has been allowed. The plaintiff is a tenant in the suit premises. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Court below considering the materials available on record passed reasoned order allowing the application filed by respondent Nos.7 to 11 and, therefore, I find no reason to interfere with the reason assigned by the Court below and it is not a case of miscarries of justice or that the Court below has acted illegally or beyond its jurisdiction. Therefore, this writ application is dismissed. Sanjeev/- (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)