IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 30TH MARCH 2010 / 9TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 6037 of 2010(D) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- SASIKUMAR, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.KESAVAN NAIR, SUSMITHAM, KALLEKULANGARA, NEAR CO.OPERATIVE BANK, AKATHETHARA, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. MR.VINOD KUMAR.C RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTRATE, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD. 2. ASST.ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, OLAVAKKODE, PALAKKAD. 3. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD. 4. MADHUSOODHANAN, S/O.KESAVAN NAIR, MUTHIYIL HOUSE, KALLEKULANGARA, PALAKKAD-9. 5. GOPALAKRISHNAN,S/O.KESAVAN NAIR, MUTHIYIL HOUSE, KALLEKULANGARA, PALAKKAD-9. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.BIJOY CHANDRAN R2 & R3 BY STANDING COUNSEL MR.P.P.THAJUDEEN R5 BY MR.K.SHRIHARI RAO THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C.) No.6037 of 2010 --------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of March 2010 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents are proceeding with hasty steps to draw the electric line through the property of the petitioner without any regard to the objection raised in this regard. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent submits that the objection raised by the petitioner can be referred to the 3rd respondent for proper adjudication. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 2 & 3, the learned Government Pleader appearing for the 1st respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the 4th and 5th respondents. 3. In the above circumstances, the 2nd respondent is directed to refer the objection preferred by the petitioner to the W.P.(C) No.6037 of 2010 -2- 3rd respondent within one week. On receipt of it, the matter shall be considered by the 3rd respondent and appropriate orders shall be passed in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and all concerned, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month thereafter. It is made clear that, till such final orders are passed by the 3rd respondent, the steps to draw the line shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE Jvt