THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH C.C. No.1109 of 2010 ORDER: This contempt case is filed seeking to punish the respondent for violating the order dated 15.11.2008 passed in W.P. No.27144 of 2005. The case of the petitioner is that he filed W.P. No.27144 of 2005 seeking the action of the respondents therein in not regularizing his services from 01.01.1992 i.e., on par with his juniors as illegal and consequently to direct the respondents to regularize his services taking into consideration the award passed by the Labour Court No.III, Hyderabad in I.D. No.722 of 1993. Eventually, this Court on 15.11.2008 disposed of the writ petition directing the respondent Corporation to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization of his service by considering the continuity of service as per the award dated 23.01.1996 passed in I.D. No.722 of 1993 and to pass appropriate orders, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Pursuant to the said orders, the 2nd respondent issued proceedings, dated 24.06.2009 regularising the services of the petitioner with effect from 01.01.1992 but the arrears were not paid to the petitioner, which is violation of the order passed by this Court in W.P. No.27144 of 2005. The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that taking into consideration the award passed in I.D. No.722 of 1993, complied with the order passed by this Court on 15.11.2008 in W.P. No.27144 of 2005 and necessary proceedings dated 24.06.2009 was issued to that effect. Thereby, there is no violation of order passed by this Court in W.P. No.27144 of 2009. The main claim of the petitioner in this contempt case is that admittedly proceedings dated 24.06.2009, regularizing the services of the petitioner with effect from 01.01.1992, was issued but the arrears from the date of effecting the regularization to the date of proceedings were not paid. From a perusal of the order passed by this Court in W.P. No.27144 of 2005 it is clear that the respondent Corporation was directed to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization of his services by considering the continuity of service as per the award dated 23.01.1996 in I.D. No.722 of 1993 and to pass appropriate orders within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Further, from a perusal of the operative portion of the award passed in I.D. No.722 of 1993 it is obvious that the respondent was directed to reinstate the petitioner into service with continuity of service without attendant benefits and without back wages. Therefore, in compliance with the orders passed by this Court in W.P. No.27144 of 2005, the respondent authorities have issued proceedings dated 24.06.2009, regularising the services of the petitioner with continuity of service but without attendant benefits and without back wages. The claim of the petitioner is that he is entitled to the payment of arrears but it is nowhere, neither in the order passed by this Court in W.P. No.27144 of 2005 nor in the award passed in I.D. No.722 of 1993, mentioned that he is entitled to payment of arrears. Therefore, it cannot be said that the respondents have violated the orders passed by this Court in W.P. No.27144 of 2005. In view of the above, this contempt case is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this contempt case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH Date: 07.02.2011. LSK