IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30911 of 2009 SANT RAM SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4 2.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. One Sant Ram Singh joined as assistant teacher on forged appointment letter. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is not the person who joined for Sant Ram Singh as parentage and address of that person was different. Petitioner is son of Mahavir Singh, resident of village Shobhani, P.S.Gangora, District Khagaria while Sant Ram Singh who joined the post though is son of Mahavir Singh but resident of village Mahgaon, P.S. & District Jamui. Appointment is never declared valid by any Court though the teachers worked for the period on forged certificate were ordered to be paid their salary for the period for which they worked as there was no dismissal order. It is a case of forgery committed by several persons. So, liability is fixed by the Police that petitioner was the real person who joined the service cannot be exempted on the basis of 2 mentioning of a fake address as none was found to that address. Investigation in the case is in progress and continuing. It is for the Investigating Officer to get compared the signature of this petitioner and the person who joined in name of Sant Ram Singh which is not possible if petitioner keeps himself away from custody. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)