IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-20345 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: July 08, 2011 Nirmal Singh .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of direction to respondent No.1 to register a case against respondent No.2 and take action as per law. 2. Learned counsel contends that an application has been made to Officer (Incharge), Economic Wing, Community Centre, Phase VI, Mohali vide Annexure P-4 and yet no action has been taken. 3. I have gone through the contents of Annexure Crl. Misc. No. M-20345 of 2011 [2] P-4. Prima facie, Annexure P-4 does not indicate commission of any cognizable offence. In view of the same, no direction can be issued to respondent No.1 in regard to complaint, Annexure P-4. It is however made clear that the petitioner would be at liberty to approach the concerned Station House Officer with a complaint. 4. In case, the complaint prima facie indicates commission of cognizable offence, appropriate action under Section 154 Cr.P.C. would be taken. In case, no action is taken by the Station House Officer, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail remedy under Section 154(3) Cr.P.C. 5. The petition is accordingly disposed of. (AJAI LAMBA) July 08, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?