IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No. 9290 of 2008 Decided on: 19.4.2011 Shri Madan Lal …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1. For the petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 & 2. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Ms. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner draws the attention of this Court towards order passed by learned erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, dated 9.8.2005. In view of this, the present petition is rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge April 19, 2011 (K. Attri) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No