// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT PRINCIPAL SEAT, JODHPUR ORDER In S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3318/2009 {Krishankant @ Pintu Versus The State of Rajasthan} Date of Order ::: 22nd July, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Shri Mukesh Patodia, counsel for the petitioner Shri Anil Joshi, PP for the State of Rajasthan #### By the Court: The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that offence under Section 379 IPC is triable by Magistrate, therefore, application for bail of the petitioner be considered. The learned PP contended that petitioner is habitual offender as seven other cases are pending against him, which is clear from para 6 of the order dated 10th April, 2009 passed by the Sessions Judge, Bhilwara. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in view of all the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to allow this bail application and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. // 2 // //DK//