i { (^- \yy-z /-- BEFORETHEHON'BLEHIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P(SlNo. J0^& /2009 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS .^' ^'^ ^'^y^ ^M^ ^^y ^•" '^ ^Smt. Kusum Philip (Pathak) VWO. V. Pathak, aged about- 50 years, Staff Nurse, Government Raghunath District Hospital, Ambikapur, Suiguja, R/o. Dansipara, Ambikapur (C.G.) VERSUS <1 The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : the Secretary, Department of Health, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of M.P. through- Secretary, Department of Health, Satpuda Bhawan, Bhopal(M.P.) 3. Director, Health Services Chhattisgarh, Directorate, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 4. Joint Director (Nursing), Directorate of Health Services, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) 5. Civil Surgeon, Surguja, Ambikapur, District HospitalAmbikapur(C.G.) 6. Smt. S. Toppo, Nursing Sister, Govt. Maharani Hospital, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar(C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTJCLE'^26 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDiA. T XI-HC—78 3:n^T'^T R^Job '<T^T 3T1^T sb^Joh °?^T ^1^1<1<LJ, ^Tll1HII<o, f®i<ni<H^< ^,^^.....!.4....&...c.&).......&a^,<,^ 3?IT^Ttq?RR> ( ^^^) < ^<?TW;R^I ^lt^ ^ij^F<v1*<itl 'RTRT^f ^ fest iHq^K ^37f?W3ff^r SB : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTIC& PRITINKBR DIWAKER 02.07.2009 case the respondent No.6 is also be given due opportL| promoted. Shri A.K.Prasad, couns^ Shri Shashank Thakurl Heard Grievance of the petitl respondent No.6 but yet she 1^ promotion has been grante^ existing rules. Contention of learned 4 be permitted to withdraw th^ already made a representat| Health serTices (respondent N} respondent No.3 for deciding | Learned counsel for thl as made by the petitioner v^ with law and direction may| respondent No.6 is going to| opportunity to be heard. The presenfc petition is to respondent No.3 to decidej the petitioner if already not <|ecided as expeditiously as possible. In sl for the petitioner. P.L. for the State. bner is that though she is senior to ;as not been promoted and the benefit of to respondent No.6 contran'- to the |ounsel for the petitioner is that he niay present petition as the petitioner has \on (Annexure P/10) to the Director, ID.S). He however prays for a directioii to |he representation so made. ^ State submits that the representation |3uld be decided strictly in accordance be issued that in case the right of be affected then she will also get an jiismissed as withdrawn with a direction the representation (Annexure P/10) of |ikely to be affected adversefy, she may |nity because she has already been Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge 4-. <^/