IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No. 22969 of 2011 Date of decision December 12, 2011 M/s Punj Galvowires Private Ltd. ....... Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. R. K. Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the representation made for making payment for the work done is duly considered and appropriate orders are passed for disbursement of the same. It is contended that the liability for making the payment is admitted and the delay for releasing the amount is not justified. Respondent No.3 shall take a decision on the claim made by the petitioner and appropriate orders will be passed releasing the amounts within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order and if there are no pending claims by the respondent against the petitioner the amount shall be ordered to be released within a further period of four weeks from the time when the decision is taken. 2. The writ petition is disposed of dispensing with notice to the respondents at the stage of admission itself. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 12 , 2011 archana