1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8254/2008 Kamlesh Chouhan. vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8254/2008 Kamlesh Chouhan. vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date : 8.7.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.M.Mridul, Sr.Adv. A/w Ms.Vandana, for the petitioner. None present for the respondents. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This Court directed to issue notices on 24.10.2008 and notices were duly served but nobody appeared on behalf of the respondents inspite of service. Then again on 25.11.2008, this Court directed to issue notice to the respondents to show cause as to why the writ petition be not finally heard at this stage, obviously at the stage of admission only. Not only that but even interim order was passed to keep one post of Gram Sewak in Zila Parishad, Jodhpur vacant to protect rights of the petitioner. Second time, notices 2 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8254/2008 Kamlesh Chouhan. vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. were served and yet nobody has appeared for the respondents, therefore, at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter is heard on merits. The petitioner's contention is that 70 posts of Gram Sevak & Paden Sachiv were sought to be filled in and out of which 10 vacancies were reserved for SC candidates and 4 vacancies were reserved for SC women candidates and rest of the vacancies were required to be filled in as given in notification Annex.2. The petitioner applied for the said post in pursuance to the notification Annex.2. The petitioner's name came at S.No.1 in the waiting list in the category of reserved seats for SC. One vacancy occurred because one of the candidates, who happened to be the real brother of the petitioner, resigned and, therefore, the petitioner submitted his representation that against the said vacancy, the petitioner may be given appointment. The petitioner was not given appointment, then the petitioner approached this Court by filing this writ petition. As stated above, inspite of sending notices 3 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8254/2008 Kamlesh Chouhan. vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. twice and passing of interim order, nobody appeared to oppose the writ petition and that too inspite of the fact that the order was passed that the writ petition will be decided at admission stage. There is no reason to disbelieve the petitioner's statement made in the writ petition and, therefore, the writ petition is allowed to the extent that the respondents may consider the case of the petitioner for appointment to the post sought to be filled by Annex.2 in accordance with law and if it is found that the petitioner is entitled to the relief, then the same be granted to the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, which may be supplied by the petitioner to the respondents. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya