// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT PRINCIPAL SEAT, JODHPUR ORDER In S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.2874/2009 {Deva Ram & Another Versus State of Rajasthan} Date of Order ::: 22nd July, 2009 PRESENT HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN Shri M.S. Amrawat, counsel for the petitioners Shri Anil Joshi, PP for the State of Rajasthan Shri N.S. Bharti, counsel for the complainant #### By the Court: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s), learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available to me during the arguments of the case. Learned PP as well as learned counsel for the complainant, both, contended that entire prosecution evidence is complete except the statement of one investigating officer, which is likely to be examined shortly, therefore, at this stage i.e. at the fag end of the trial, the bail application should not be examined on merits, otherwise it may prejudice the case of either party. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly and frankly contended that the trial // 2 // court may now be directed to complete the trial within a period of three months and a liberty may be given to the petitioner to move a fresh application in case the trial is not completed within the said period. After considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, I find that submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is reasonable, hence the bail application is dismissed without considering the case on merits and trial court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order. It will be open for the petitioner to move fresh bail application in case the trial is not delayed on account of him and it is not completed within the aforesaid period. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J. //DK//