XI—HC 78 Wm m zoo WW (Wu) WWW WWW WW wW awfmm mmm (siggle 3ench; Hon'bm Mr. Justice Dhirendr'a Mishrai W. No.5371/200 (Pe'ri‘l'ion U/ 6 of Consfi'ru‘rion of India) Peiifioner : R Pandey, S/o Ln1'e Radheshyam .Pondey, abouf 59 year-s, Occupation Panchaya‘r d an Social Education Organizer, Janpa Respondents e Janpad Panchgyaf Masturi, Through . T ‘1' e Chief Execu'rive Officer, Masturi, D sfricf Bilaspur 6.6. 3. R khimm Sahu, Occupation Panchaya'r and 5 ciai Education Organizer, Janpad P chaya‘r Marwahi, District Biiaspur. Present: Mr. Rakesh Pandey, Adv; for th petitioner. Mrs. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer the State. 25.9.2008 Heard. This is the second roun of Iitigation. Earlier W.P. (s) No.3850/08 filed by the petitioner was 5.7.2008 with liberty to the petitioner to make representation beig/ethe ll isposed of by this Court vide order dated ll l‘l \ ti P. s 8 A 2 . . r Wm amémm (Wu) W 200 mmm mmm Wmm wwwiwm €5amsrram P'LK‘ concerned authority. However, I has been dismissed vide order of Learned counsel for ihe pi To rei'ire in fine, momh of Seq Governmem' where a person is posfed af'i'he place of his c ice. However, This ospecf has no? been considered by ‘rhe concerned out orify while rejecfing his representa‘rion. Having heard iearned cou el for 1'he peTiTioner, having regard 1'0 1‘he fact That 'rhe transfer is an exig ncy of service and 1'he pe‘i'i‘rioner worked in The presen‘i' place of posting for ore Than six years, I am of The considered opinion ThaT no interference is c also MW sTands dismissed. Sdl— Dhirendra Mishra , Judge aepresen'rn‘rion preferred by The pefifionerj Annexure P—1 da‘i'ed 6.9.2008. _ i zfifioner submi'rs fhqf The pei'ifioner is due )fember, 2009 and as per policy of 'ihe e fo retire wi‘i'hin one year, he shouid be led for. Accordingly, The peTiTion is dismissed. ConseodenTly, LA. No.1 gram om was, minions —Fsz197~3/2oox Amoco. ‘