IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 1ST FEBRUARY 2010 / 12TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 3179 of 2010(V) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.R.SASI, S/O. LATE RAMAN, AGED 50 YEARS THARAYIL HOUSE, ADUVASSERRY.P.O., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. KUNNUKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KUNNUKARA.P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, KUNNUKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KUNNUKARA.P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ------------------- W.P.(C).3179/2010 -------------------- Dated this the 1st day of February, 2010 JUDGMENT Aggrieved by Ext.P3, a stop memo issued by the 2nd respondent requiring to stop the activities in the petitioner's Unit, petitioner has filed Ext.P4 appeal to the 1st respondent. Although several contentions are raised by the petitioner about the alleged invalidity of Ext.P3, having regard to the fact that statutory remedy is available to the petitioner which has also been invoked by him, I do not think it necessary for this Court to enter into the merits of the controversy at least at this stage. This is all the more for the reason that, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, 1st respondent has already heard the parties on Ext.P4 appeal. 2. In view of the above, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 1st respondent to pass orders on Ext.P4, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with the copy of the writ petition. ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge mrcs