ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1975 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO. 1975 OF 2008 OF MOTION NO. 1975 OF 2008 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (LODGING) NO.296 OF 2008 (LODGING) NO.296 OF 2008 (LODGING) NO.296 OF 2008 IN IN IN CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 273 OF 2007 SUMMONS NO. 273 OF 2007 SUMMONS NO. 273 OF 2007 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.779 OF 2007 PETITION NO.779 OF 2007 PETITION NO.779 OF 2007 Snehal Shivalkar & Ors. ...Appellants. Versus Elegant Industries Pvt.Ltd.& Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.M.D.Nagle for the Appellants. Mr.Avinash Joshi i/by M/s.Mulla and Mulla for Respondent Nos. 1,5 and 7. Mr.Shaikh i/by M/s.Thakordas & Madgavkar for Respondent No.6. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.B.MHASE & : S.B.MHASE & : S.B.MHASE & R.V.MORE, R.V.MORE, R.V.MORE, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATED DATED DATED : 22ND AUGUST, 2008 : 22ND AUGUST, 2008 : 22ND AUGUST, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. . Heard learned counsel appearing for both the sides. 2. This Notice of Motion is filed for condonation of delay of 185 days in filing the present Appeal. The ( 2 ) ground for condoning the delay is that there are 43 Appellants who are labourers and they are scattered and therefore, their signatures could not be obtained. The ground appears to be genuine and therefore, we condone the delay. The office is directed to number the Appeal and process it for admission. 3. The Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly. (R.V.MORE, (R.V.MORE, (R.V.MORE, J.) J.) J.) (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE, J.) J.) J.)