IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7095 of 2005 Vishwanath Pathak, son of Late Pandit Kailash Pathak, resident of Village- Telbigha, P.O.-Mukhsudpur, P.S.-Khinjarsarai, District-Gaya. ………Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, through the Collector, Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad. 2. The Director, Provident Fund, Provident Fund Directorate, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 3. The District Provident Fund Officer, District-Jehanabad. 4. The Block Development Officer, B.D.O. Office, Ghosi, District- Jehanabad. …….Respondents. ----------- 02. 19.03.2009 After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, the grievance raised by the petitioner basically amounts nitty gritty of accounting. If petitioner has any serious doubt about the account, he has freedom to sit with the District Provident Fund Officer, Jehanabad and understand the same and if any discrepancy emerges then appropriate steps should be taken by the District Provident Fund Officer or the dispute should be allowed to rest. The writ application stands disposed of. Shageer (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)