IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 11454 of 2005 Between: J.Satyanarayana Rao. S/o.Rajeswerrao, O/o.The District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd., Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector-/PIC/Chairman, The Karimnagar District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd., Karimnagar, Karimnagar district. 2 The General Manager, Karimnagar District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd., Karimnagar, Karimnagar district. ..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to May be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the impugned Proc.Rc.No.B5/208/2005-06 dt.5-5-2005 issued by the 1st Respondent in placing the petitioner under suspension as illegal, null and void and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits, by holding the action of the respondent No.1, in placing the petitioner under suspension without any valid reason or justification is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and subversive of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CH.JAGANNADHA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 11454 of 2005 ORDER: The very Writ Petition is filed challenging the proceedings dated 05.05.2005 issued by the 1st respondent placing the petitioner under suspension, pending enquiry into certain allegations made against him. 2. At the time of admission of the Writ Petition on 10.06.2005, no interim order was passed. Thus, the petitioner was continuing under suspension. Now it is more than two years since the petitioner was under suspension. It is not known as to whether the enquiry contemplated against him has been completed or not. Under those circumstances, the respondents are directed to complete the enquiry, if not already completed, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and pass appropriate orders as per the law. If no enquiry is conducted and completed by that time, the petitioner shall be reinstated into service forthwith on completion of three months. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. _________________ C.V.RAMULU, J. Date: 28.02.2008. GS