HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.DURGA PRASAD W.P. No.24904 of 2001 Dated 26-11-2010 Between: Kurasala Laxmana Rao. …Petitioner. And: A.P.State Road Transport Corporation represented by its Vice-Chairman and Managing Director, Hyderabad and others. …Respondents. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.DURGA PRASAD W.P. No.24904 of 2001 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. None appeared for the respondents. 2. Petitioners challenging the memo issued by the respondents bearing No.P4/785(63)/2001-RM:VZM dated 29-11-2001 directing him to appear before the Selection Committee at 11 A.M., on 10-12-2001 in the office of the Regional Manger, A.P.S.R.T.C., Railway Station Road, Vizianagaram along with all supporting documents i.e., Service Certificate, Register of Musters, Register of Pay Rolls, Trip-sheets, Control Charts, details of Provident Fund recovery particulars for the period worked, Educational qualifications. 3. The petitioner is seeking for absorption in the respondent-Corporation as a displaced person in view of the nationalization of the route, Vizianagaram to S.Kota. The case of the petitioner was not considered. Thereafter, the petitioner filed W.P.No.28312 of 1996 and the writ petition was disposed of with a direction that the case of the petitioner be considered in view of the letter issued by Regional Manager, Vizianagaram dated 6-1- 1987 and also the additional guidelines issued by the Corporation dated 7-5-1988 for appointment in the suitable posts, if they fulfil the eligibility criteria under the Regulations. This exercise shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In pursuance of the said direction, the respondent has constituted the Committee and the Committee has rejected the claim of the petitioner on the ground that his case does not fall within parameters of guidelines and additional guidelines. The said rejection order was questioned by the petitioner in W.P.No.22732 of 1998 and the said writ petition was dismissed on 30-6-1999 by single judge. Thereafter, the petitioner has filed W.A.No.1461 of 1999 and the same was allowed on 26- 10-1999 holding that the petitioner falls within the category of displaced employee under the third category i.e., where the vehicles were under operation for one prior to the introduction of services by A.P.S.R.T.C. in the year 1986, and accordingly allowed the writ appeal and directed the Corporation to consider the case of the appellant for appointment of conductor in accordance with the Rules and the Scheme framed by for absorption of displaced employees, within a period of eight weeks. Thereafter, the respondent Corporation carried the matter to the Supreme Court in SLP No.88 of 2000 and the same was finally dismissed. Thereafter the petitioner submitted representation dated 9-11-2001 seeking for implementation of judgment in W.A.No.1461 of 1999 dated 26-10-1999. On the said representation, the 2nd respondent issued letter dated 29-11-2001 calling upon the petitioner to appear for interview on 10-12-2001 along with certificates. Now the said memo is being questioned by the respondent in this writ petition on the ground that the petitioner has already submitted all the certificates at the time of interview conducted earlier and the said certificates are not available with him and taking advantage of the same, the respondent is seeking for production of the said documents only to circumvent the order passed in W.A.No.1461 of 1999. Moreover, the documents sought to be produced by the petitioner, may not be available with the petitioner as they are being maintained by the owner of the bus and the petitioner can only produce the Service Certificate and Educational Certificates. Since the directions were already issued by the court in W.A.No.1461 of 1999 to consider the case of the petitioner, for appointment of conductor in accordance with the Rules and the Scheme framed for absorption for displaced employees, therefore, it would be sufficient to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for his appointment as a conductor in accordance with the Rules and the Scheme framed for absorption of displaced employees by conducting interview and on production of service certificates and certificates of his educational qualifications. 4. Hence, the respondents are directed to complete the said process within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________________________ JUSTICE P.DURGA PRASAD Dated 26-11-2010. Dvs HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.DURGA PRASAD W.P. No.24904 of 2001 Dated 26-11-2010