$ 6 BEFORE •BHE M .P.S1&TE AiMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AT JABALPBR O.A.NO Eash Kumar Oiandrawanshi. aged 29 yrs, S/o Shrl Pekurain Cbanidrawanshi^Puinp- Atrendant,0/0 Easscative Engineer,Water- Resources Department,Kawardha Dlvlslon, Kawardha,Bistt-Rajnaadgaon.R/o Gayatri- •Tanpl®Kawardha,oistt-Raj oandgaon« V e rsu s l.State of M.P.through the Secretary.water fiesou.cces Oegartnent, Vailabb BhawaB. 2.Ch.s.ef Engineer,Mahanadi Gadawari, Kachhar Water Resoarces D^iartaent, 3« Engineer^ Water Res urces Oepartnent. Engineer,water Resources ,Kawardha Divlsion,Kawardha, Oist t-Raj naadgaon •Respondents APPUC^TION UNEffiR SECTION 19 OF 1HE AIHINISTKA.TIVE TKmu tL ACT, 1985. SETAILS OF -JHE APPUC&TIONs :;< m^ l.E&rticuIars o£ the applicants &s above, 2.Fartlculars of the respoodent As above 3«Particulars of the order against whicfa ahe ^3plloatloB is made; i)Agalast the order dt, 4.8.1995 311^1 ^RI R"<l°h "WT.ofl^i st>*)i^t WH<ni (h*llth ^ST .<i|4|ioA|, ®fl|y'is,fqciiyy ^......^..^...1.^^200 <r sn^i '<R?T ('^3^?) WIBIT flftti sii^i SB_:_HON'BLE; SHRI JCSTIClfc PRITmKBR DEWAKER n'2 oa o.nna i*<iWtrf- ^r Shri Anait Verma, couad Shri Vivek Sharm.a, P.L.I Case of the peutioner ii Atr.eiidaat o& 4.12.1989 aud issuance of terinniation orde: the ofher tennuiation order il for fhe petitionei for ttie State. that he was appointed as Piuup coiitiiiued oa the said post till :. dated 4.8.1995aadaiereafter. 31.1.2000. Counsel for the temiination order dated 4.8. 5.9.1995 snd on fhe streni petitioner continued on fhe s; termiaation order dafed 31.1. on by order dated 16.2.2000. subioits that on 5.3.2008 the aild taken a decision to were appom.t.ed prior to 1998 for the last ten years. consiH.er In view of the subseque^lt the circular dated 5.3.2008, petitioner submits fhat he ia4 petition with Uberh- to rualce respondents seeldng regulariz^tion a direction to the concemed rei <bi<ii<'i41'i 'wwif ^ fest <fai«(i<. ^siRnaii^r d^ted et|tioner submits fhat th.e first 1)995 was stayed by this Court on Sth of the said stav order the ^id post tiU passing of fhe secoad EOOO which was also staved later Counsel for fhe petitioner fiuther Covem.inent has issued a circular the cases of tlie persons who s|uid also ofthose wbo are workmg developnients and issuance of at fhis stage' counsel for the jiy be perm.itted to wifhdraw this representation to fhe concemed ^tion of sen/'iGe. He also prays for ipondents to consider the case of ^' W(rfk^sitT5S°";'iatwi!:ri'P"i'—FS/95—1 ! /2303—1,00,000 3 [ -4it)ici'i(, Q'al'H're., faaKHy -^^^••••.^••^zoo^ 3(I^¥t'tR^(tcl(s°t<it?) •gEnsf^nwim t;' »' ^RIWWW 311^1 the petition.er ia fhe light of fhe| circulars issued by fh.e Govemiu^ limit inay also be fixed for dec^dia; petitioner. To this prayer of tijie counsel for the respondents/ Stalji Accordiagly, the petition i^ Uberty as aforesaid. If the petiti4ner the 'concemed respoadents with|n receipt of copy of tlsis order, t}ie expected to decide fhe sam.e w^thin. Hiontlis froia fhe date cf its recs law. disinissed as withdrawn witll .4ner niakes a representation to one laonth froni fhe date of concemed respondents are a further period of fhree 4ipt stricfly ia accordaace wifh expres^ed This Court bas not the case and the aufhorities representation of the petitioner taking iato consideration fhe respect of regularization of govenj 'tSi^41'l:l^^^ ^^^ <^i<-$R i?3ifOT3ntB legal position and the various :nt. He subinits fhat sorue tiine fhe repicsenta.tioa of fhe counsel for fhe petitioner, has no objection. aay opinion on the inerits of coticem.ed are free to decide fhe ^tricfly in accordance wifh law c^rculars aad fbe guidelines ia. enjunent eraployees. SA^nwa^ ^^ ?[rai&(!§;fTir<ii;"iid<i<w-iismg—FS/95—ii/zeos—1,00,000.