.{1}. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4102 OF 2009 Jitendra Rohidas Watkare. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra and 3 others. ..Respondents. .... Mr.R.K. Mendadkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.V.S. Masurkar, G.P., for State. .... CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND CORAM : BILAL NAZKI AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009. DATED : 21ST APRIL, 2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. With their consent, the petition is disposed of. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by a letter received from respondent No.3 requiring him to produce the caste certificate within 15 days, in default, he has been threatened with disciplinary action. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has approached respondent No.2 Committee for verification of the caste certificate in the year 2004 and still it has not been decided and in this view of the matter he cannot produce the caste .{2}. certificate. 3. We believe that the matter can be disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to dispose of the application of the petitioner, if it is still pending, within a period of three months from today. For a period of three months from from today, the respondent No.3 shall not proceed against the petitioner on the ground that he has not produced his caste certificate. 4. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. [BILAL NAZKI,J.] [BILAL NAZKI,J.] [BILAL NAZKI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]