IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.2642 of 2008 Date of Decision: December 10, 2008 Yad Ram .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Haryana & Another .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. R.S. Tacoria, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) The application for summoning Saroj Bala, Subhash and Satish Kumar as additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. has been dismissed vide impugned order dated 4.12.2008. It has been noticed that PW-1 Sonia had been giving different versions of the incident before the police during investigation and before the Magistrate under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and at the trial stage. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the case set up by Sonia is that she was under pressure to give the statement as it was given under Section 164 Cr.P.C. On a pointed query of the Court, learned counsel however admits that no complaint was ever Crl. Rev. No.2642 of 2008 [2] made in regard to the wrong recording of statement of Sonia. The reasons given in the impugned order are legally tenable in law and do not call for interference. The petition is dismissed. (AJAI LAMBA) December 10, 2008 JUDGE avin