IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 16TH AUGUST 2010 / 25TH SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 19936 of 2010(N) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- M.ABDUL NADEER, MARANGATTU, POYIL THODI, CHELAMBRA P.O., MALAPPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.V.G.ARUN, SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. RAMANATTUKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, RAMANATTUKARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT- 673 633, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, RAMANATTUKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, RAMANATTUKARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT- 673633. 3. P.MUJEEB RAHMAN, ZAIBOONA MANZIL, RAMANATTUKARA P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 633. R1 & R2 BY ADVS. SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN, SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR, SMT.GEETHA P.MENON, SRI.N.AJITH, SRI.P.M.NEELAKANDAN, ADV. SRI. K. JAYAKUMAR R3 BY ADV. SRI.R.RAMADAS. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/08/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.19936/2010-N: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE SANITARY CERTIFICATE DTD. 31/10/2006. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.15571/2007 DTD. 11/12/2007. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 09/04/2008. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE RESOLUTION DTD. 25/11/2008. EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL OF THE LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTION IN R.P. NO. 129/2008 DTD. 13/05/2009. EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 05/05/2008 ISSUED BY THE R.1. EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE DETAILS FURNISHED BY THE R.2. EXT.P.8: COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.14007/2009 DTD. 02/03/2010. EXT.P.9: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 08/03/2010. EXT.P.10: COPY OF THE REPLY DTD. 17/04/2010. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 19936 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 16th day of August, 2010. J U D G M E N T Petitioners aspire to obtain licence for running a chicken stall within the jurisdiction of 1st respondent Panchayath. The matter was taken up before the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions and by Ext.P5 order, the Secretary of the Panchayath was directed to pass appropriate orders on the applications of the petitioner seeking licence under Section 232 of the Kerala Panchayath Raj Act uninfluenced by the decisions of the Panchayath Committee dated 9.4.2008 and 25.11.2008, which were quashed by that order. That decision was challenged by the 3rd respondent herein before this Court in which by Ext.P8 judgment the challenge was repelled and the writ petition was dismissed. Petitioner's grievance in this writ petition is that although Ext.P8 judgment of this Court was passed as early as on 2.3.2010, no orders have been passed by the 2nd respondent as directed in Ext.P5 order of the Tribunal. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondents 1 and 2, wherein the only reason stated for non compliance with Ext.P5 order is that against Ext.P8 judgment, an appeal has been W.P.(C).No. 19936 of 2010 2 filed before the Division Bench, which has not come up for admission. It is admitted that the respondents 1 and 2 have not challenged Ext.P5 order but they are now challenging only Ext.P8 judgment passed in the writ petition filed by the 3rd respondent against Ext.P6. Whatever, that be, admittedly as on today there is no impediment for the 2nd respondent to pass an order in Ext.P5 order of the Tribunal. Accordingly. this writ petition is disposed with a direction to the 2nd respondent to pass orders as directed in Ext.P5 order within 2 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE mns