WP(C) 2850/2010 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HN SARMA Heard Mr. Mandal, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing co unsel, PWD. The grievance of the petitioner is that in terms of certain wor k order issued by the Superintending Engineer, (PWD), Road, Goalpara, the petiti oner executed some contractual works. Out of the said work executed by the peti tioner, an amount of Rs. 13,50,818/- ( Rupees thirteen lacs fifty thousand eight hundred and eight only) was due to him. When various requests made by the petit ioner failed to evoke any positive response from the end of the respondents to p ay the balance amount, the petitioner approached this court seeking certain dire ction to pay the aforesaid amount. It is submitted at the bar that such grievance has been adequate ly dealt with by this court in the Case of Tamsher Ali -vs- State of Assam & Or s. reported in 2008 (4) GLT Page 1. Accordingly, as agreed to by the learned cou nsel for the parties, this writ petition stands disposed of with the direction t hat the case of the petitioner be considered by the respondent authorities in terms of the direction and observations contained in the aforesaid case of Tams her Ali (Supra) and the amount due to the petitioner shall be paid accordingly. This disposed of the writ petition.