IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH OCTOBER 2007 / 18TH ASWINA 1929 RP.No. 775 of 2007() -------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN CRP.1679/2003 Dated 22/03/2004 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/REVISION PETITIONER/JUDGMENT DEBTOR: -------------------------------------- THE CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, OLAVAKKODE, REPRESENTING SOUTH DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, NILAMBUR. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI M.P.PRAKASH RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT/DECREE HOLDER: ------------------------ M.A. ABU, S/O. ATHAN PILLAI, MADAVANA HOUSE, SREEMOOLANAGARAM, CHOWARA VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.M.SAIDU MOHAMMED SRI.T.A.SHABEER ALI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/10/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN, J. --------------------------- R.P.No.775 OF 2007 IN C.R.P.NO.1679 OF 2003 ---------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of October, 2007 O R D E R An order was passed on 22nd March, 2004 permitting the respondent to continue in possession of the vehicle and the same on the same condition as already imposed by the Appellate Authority and further directed that he shall not transfer the vehicle during the pendency of the proceedings before the court. On a reading of the order it could be seen that what was passed is an interim order, since the C.R.P. is already admitted. C.R.P. is filed against the order releasing the vehicle by the Appellate Authority. Finality could be reached only after hearing the C.R.P. In the circumstances, the last sentence in the order "C.R.P. is disposed of as above" will stand deleted and the order will stand corrected. The Registry shall post the C.R.P. for hearing before the appropriate court as per roster. Review Petition is allowed as above. P.R.RAMAN, Judge. kcv.