HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.586 of 2009 Dated 23-12-2010 Between: Mogili Bheemaiah (M.Shankar). …Petitioner. And: Mogili Anjamma and another. …Respondents. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.586 of 2009 ORDER: Heard Sri L.J.Veera Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor for the 2nd respondent. 1st respondent is served but she is absent and she did not enter appearance. This Criminal Petition is filed for quashing the proceedings in Crl.M.P.No.77 of 2008 in M.C.No.13 of 2005 on the file of the court of the Family Judge at Mahbubnagar. It is seen that the 1st respondent claiming to be the legally wedded wife of the petitioner filed M.C.No.13 of 2005 claiming maintenance from the petitioner on the ground that he neglected her. The said maintenance case was allowed on 13-6-2005 by the concerned Judicial First Class Magistrate Court. The petitioner/husband filed a Criminal Revision Petition No.29 of 2005 questioning that order in the District Court at Mahabubnagar. The 1st Additional District Judge, Mahabubnagar dealt with that Criminal Revision Petition and dismissed it by his order dated 21-10- 2005. Questioning that order, the petitioner filed Criminal Petition No.479 of 2006 in this Court. This Court allowed the said Criminal Petition No.479 of 2006 on 2-8-2006 for the reasons recorded therein. It is not necessary to go into the same. The net result is that the maintenance granted by the 1st Court and confirmed by the appellate Court stand set aside by the order of this Court. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the order in Criminal Petition No.479 of 2006 setting aside the maintenance granted by both the courts below, the 1st respondent still filed an application i.e., Crl.M.P.No.77 of 2008 before the court of Family Judge, Mahabubnagar which is now dealing with the maintenance matters under Section 125 Cr.P.C. claiming interim maintenance amount granted by the Court during the pendency of Criminal Petition No.479 of 2006. A copy of this petition is filed and it would go to show that the 1st respondent not only claimed amounts ordered by this Court in Crl.P.No.479 of 2006 by way of interim maintenance but also claimed certain enhanced amounts on the ground that earlier amounts awarded are not sufficient for her. It appears that the Judge, Family Court, Mahabubnagar has entertained the said petition and it is also clear that the order dated 2-8-2006 of this Court passed in Criminal Petition No.479 of 2006 was not taken to his notice. It is clear that in view of the orders passed in Criminal Petition No.479 of 2006 allowing it and setting aside the orders of the Courts below, all further proceedings to claim maintenance including interim maintenance granted by the Court earlier cannot be entertained. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in Crl.M.P.No.77 of 2008 in M.C.No.13 of 2005 on the file of the Family Court Judge, Mahabubnagar are quashed. __________________________ Justice N.RAVI SHANKAR Dated 23-12-2010. Dvs HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.586 of 2009 Dated 23-12-2010