IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 1st Bail Application No. 1011 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Sanjay Kumar .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 198/2010 U/s 420, 467, 468, 406, 471, 506, 120-B IPC, PS Kotwali Laksar, District Haridwar. ___________________________________________________________________ November 24, 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Mr. Manish Arora, the learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, the learned Brief Holder for the State. The first information report alleges that the co-accused had taken money and that the applicant along with the co- accused had given false promises to give an employment to the complainant in some firm. Considering the facts and circumstances that have been brought on the record and without commenting on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail at this stage. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Sanjay Kumar be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 198/2010 under Section 420, 467, 468, 406, 471, 506, 120-B IPC subject to his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of CJM, Haridwar. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 24.11.2010 PRABODH