rf' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: 8H. WritPetit!On(Si No. 4134 6f 2308 1); . Sushil, Kumar'^EBsh\a@l,'.S/o. Late Shri - Ganesh Ram. Bish»3|^,flge.about -52 years, U.D.T., Govt. ^ Middle Schcio!, Kudmura, . Distt. Jashpur(CG)^. ? ;:' '• ' . . 2) Ky. Joljeri Bilohen.Sec;k,;(Now^Sfl')t.Tocpo),f • Wfl/o, Shrt pramoday' Toppp, Age alsouf '47 :vears,. • Asstt. "T'eaeBef', • Gwf.: Primary , Sohooi, Ghuitiapani; Distt::'*iashpur -(CQ). 3) TKomasXaxa,^S/o: LateShri.Marsei Lutha , . Xaxa; Age}about55 ^ars, Asstt Teactier, Govt. Rrimaiy-: Sohool, .Kurtajnga, DistS. Jashpur(eG).^' ! . . : • • 4) ; Biteshwer Ram Chauhan, ,;SA):. Late Shri / ° Sami-ij Ram Cj"!0uhan, Age.aboui: 5Q;yesr5, Asstt. • Teaotier, Govt.' Driniary School; Kurkunga, Distt. Jashpur (CG). Wtffls^ li'l RssDondents Versus ' :::: . • : :: ' '- :- 1 •I) Statey'Govt. '•lot .ChhaStisgarn, througr) • • Secretary, Departraent;' of Tribar'Welare Depaftment, BKrS:'Bftawan, RaipuF(CG). 2)! Assistant Commisstorier, Trlbal Weifare Department, Jashpur, Distt. >JasMpur(CG). -^ 3) Block . Edueation ' . ©Sicer, .Block Bagicha/Ku"><uri, Distt. Jashpyr (GG). . 4) joint Dtreetor,.; ..TreasuiY, :Account & :. Pension, Jasbpur; ,Distt}yashpur.(eG); • • / •(Writ Petitiorl''ynd®)-Art!cle'226oftBeCOnstifutionof india.) Present; -Stiri SomlontVerma.counselfortheDgtitjoners. ; : . ' .: 1' • - Smt. Sunita«Jain,'PanelLawyer fortheState. - . : ;il •.;' ORALOROER.: .-1,-:,,. '••,:••• ,..•,. .:•.:•':•:.'.: (Passedonthis30tt'day6fJuly,2(»8) ^'*: ; ." ' ' . • '. .^ :•.:''.•''''••:''•'' ii':'.:'-^^ With consent of learned counsel appearing forthe parties, the'matter is.tieafe! finaiiy.':- • , '. : ' ,: ; 1....1 •,---:, ^.,:1. '..•.'.'.-;.:- 2) Learned csunselappearing(orthepetitiQneresul:roitsthat(he;Retitioriers-were^ appointed as Assistantl^oheFs': jn'the,year 1974;and 1983,cB^A<etf Rs.100/- and ,Rs:1.5D/-^ TOT a'.period?of:'two ^ probatton,the petitiohers'were^raFifeGhiBgtjlaF.pay^seaie.^^He^feftKeFMto issue.invpived in the case; is aslo w&efher?the/;petfE!oitiTS;.aj-e : entitlecf t .regulS^pay 3 :SK ttfl' - s scaie with-effeot from the cfate of-initial appointment orafter oompietion of probation penod.: :' .' 1'1,. !' '; ,,,..1: : '. '. • .' ':::''. 1 1'. 3) The issue involved hersin was cpnsidered by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunsil, Jabalpyr in O.A.No;2746/89 (IVIadhukant Yadu and56 others Vs Stete of IVI.P. & others), wherein it was held that the similariy situated teachefs are entitled to reguiar pay soaie w.e.f. the ciate of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the t-fon'bie Sypreme Co'urt. The appeal was djsmissed by the Hon'ble Supreme 'CoLtrt, upholding the •decision' of the TriBunal fo'the^^ e^ that the reaotiers/Assistant Teachere are. entitled to reguiar pay scale from' date: of initial appointment. • ; : • 4) - ' In yiew of the .above stated submissions'msde by ieamed oounsel foi' the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms i.e., ihe petitjoners are granted iiberty to inake a representation, if so advised, to consider the petitjoners' case, ifthey stand onthesamefootingsas perorderclated 24-8-1992 bytheMadhya Pradesh State Admihistrative Tribunal, Jabaipur, in O.A.No. 2745 of 89 (Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequentiy eohfirmedbyorderdated 3-1-1994 passedbythe Hon'ble Supreme Court io Special LeavepeiitiQn (Civii) No. 6892/93 and grantrelief accordingly. ,; '' ••.''-• • . ,, :. ''.•,: ^ , 1,, ' . : : 5); in view of,foi'egoiri9,,the.petlti6n Isdisposea 6f/ N0 order asto OQsts Sd/- SatishK.Agniftotri Judge .-/""'. • . ..'..' :... •w sss la