IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 10333 of 2008 Between: The Harijan Labour Contract Cooperative Society Limited, Regn.No.05/2002-03, E.E.P.R. Kothagudem, Manikyaram Village, Illandu Mandal, Khammam District, rep. by its President Janagam Koteswara Rao. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Chairman, Integrated Tribal Development Agency, Khammam, Khammam District (District Collector). 2 The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Agency, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District. 3 The Executive Engineer, Irigation and Command Area Development, Irrigation Division, Kothagudem, Hqrs. Paloncha, Khammam District. 4 The Dy. Executive Engineer, Tribal Welfare, Sub Division, Sudimalla, Khammam District. 5 The Asst. Engineer, Irrigation Division, Kothagudem Hqrs. Paloncha, Khammam District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not paying the final bill to the petitioner due to the petitioner from the respondents for constructing Neelamayya Kunta across Neelamayya Vagu near Shabunigudem village, Gundala Mandal, Khammam District, as illegal, arbitrary unreasonable, contrary to the provisions of the Contract entered into between the petitioner herein and the Respondents herein and also violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and issue a consequential direction to the respondents herein to pay the final bill due to the petitioner herein forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.RAJAMALLA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following ORDER: HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI Writ Petition No.10333 of 2008 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. _____________ G.Rohini, J Dt.15.06.2009 Note: Issue CC by tomorrow. (b/o) VGB