^^^ ^^Qy n IN THB: HIGH COURT OF JUDaCATURE AT BILASPUR(CHH&TT3!SOARH) WRIT PETITION N0» 2-53.^-QF 2003 PE;TITIONE:RSE V E R S U S RESPONDENTS. ^•9 ^ ^ L^ ^ L<^ '<^ ^^ v ^,^%^^Y ^^^•-" •A-""" : y VA° ^ •^/' MuJ. Sai, son o£ Sunder ®aA,Rajwar, aged aboufe 58 yearSo Teju Ram<> son of Rurte Rajwar, aged about 5S yearao Both are residents o£ Village- Dumardih• Tehsi1-^tatbikapxir, DlstriGt-Sarguja, <c,Go) la Board o£ Revenue^ Chhattisgarh,Bllaspur,(C,G, ) 2o Colleetor, Sarguja, iKribikapur, District Sarguja. <C,G. ) 3o Sub Divi.sj.ona.l offieer, (Revenue ) Ambikapur,5istrict-Sarguja, (c.G.) 4o Sant Ram^son o£ Akbar Sai, aged about 3§ yea^So 5o Mast Ram,son o£ -Ncbar 8ai^ 60 J^i Raim ^son of Xkbar Sai^ Resporrient tfoo 4 feo 6 are residents of Village<vBumardih^ post uaaipur.Tehsil-^mbikapur, &istrj.et-S;arguj'a, (CoG») ^iTpE.TmON UNDBR ARTICLES 226^227 GF TO® G01@TJTUTION OF INDI^<, ^^—„ ^;^i';ife XI-HC-22 STI^T^T T<rii<^ STI^? ?h^i<=b ^f^a ^^ ^(^i<ri<{, ^^^l^ ^l^y .^.•^f-"-o^l^ I^^T' WR^IT^W^ 200 3TT^T'^dT^R'^'cT 29-9-2003 Shri B.D. Guru, courisei Heard. . By thi^ p^tition fil Constitution of.India, the pe 7-8-2003 passed by the Bo< No. 396/A-23/2002-2003 b has been rejected by the Boa The p©tition©rs?petr l^d under Articles 226/227 of the 't'itioners ha^e challenged the order dated |rd of Revenue, Chhatti^arh in Reyision ^ which the interim appiication for stay tj^d of^evenue, revjsion before the Board ofl Sarguja dated 14-7-2003 by respondents 4,5 and 6 and Ths learned counsel fo question was purchased fronf^ has been canceiled after cbi1MM41l1 H!H<viT ^ f^Ld1 <Fs1^i< ^T ^Ti^PT <3TT^T for the petitioners, ^ion i^ that the petitioner^ moved a Revenue against the.order of Coiiector, ^hich the Collector qltowed the appeat of ^ancell&d th& transf&r of land by sate in favour of the petiTioners anjd directed the reversion of the !and to respondents 4; 5 and 6* I have heard the iearn^d fiounsei for the petitioners. ^ the petitioners submits that the land in the father of respond^nts 4 to 6 after obtdning the permission frojn the Coltector on 13-3-67 and the sqie 36 years and the petitioners are in possession of the land in qu^stion. Counsei further submits thatthe stay Gpplication has been rejected which would cause irreparable ioss to the petitioner^, [Tft"^ ^ft^ T XI-HC-22 ^¥rXr f^=ri^3Tlt^T sh^i<=h ^[i^ ^ 1..^ \. &0.^^2-| -^ '^ ^[ ^1^1<VI^ ^Ti1^<l<o, fa<11^^< air^W '<?^ WNc^WW^ '^ 200 Havin9 heard the r-egard to 1+ie facts and petitibners are in possessi r^vision is Dending before circumstances, ends of jusl the Board of i^evenue to Board of Revenue, BilGSpui itself within a pepiod of 3 m< In th@ meanwhil®,th< be disturbed. The writ petition is di ConsequBntiy/ M.(W.) aiso stand disposed of. Parti©sare entitled cbl^^l-t WTOf ^ f^t 'rf^STC ^ 3Tf^R OT^T le^rned counsel for the parties dnd having circumstances of the case, since the on of the land since 36 years and the tha Board pf Rev^nua, Biia^pur, sn the ice would meet jf The direction is given to <|ispo^e of the revision/ Accorclingly, the ', is directed to dispose of the revision ?nths'from today. poss©ssionof th^ petjtioners shouid not spo^ed of accordin9ly, ^. No. 2741/2003 and l.A. No. 8904/2003 f^rcertified copy of this orcier. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [^.^f^