itlfia«iAiB^^3yy'ri!£»i>?^iK<s*^tniBUlf9a«,i'*,-KsS -.•••' .^y'^y--'. \13..^"<fe?-i'"....••-' ,.......-:^^^-", ^s.^- IN THE 1-II6H COURT OF JUbICATURE -4T BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fS) N0. K ^ > OF 2007 PETITIONER: ^ ^^' cA\otk-' ^ '^ ^ y6^- RESPPN&ENTS: ^ Ashok Sharma, son of Shri Bisoha Prasad Sharma, aged about 55 years, Assistant Teacher, Government Higher Secondary School, Saraipali, District Mahasamund (.C.6.) Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Ministry of School Education, Mantralaya, &.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur. 2. The &istrict Education Officer, Mahasamund. WRIT PETITION UN&ER ARTICLES 226 &^2rOF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PAKnCUl^^^^- -^ ^ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH: BILASPUR Sirgle Bench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. f.S) No. 863 of 2007 Petitioner ; Ashok Sharma Versus ResDondents State of Chhattisgarh and anotiier Present: AAr. B.P. Sharma, counsel for tha petitioner. Ms. t)eepali Pandey, Panei Lawyer for the State/respondents. 1. (Passed on 14th Day of February, 2007) Lfiarned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that in the event, a representation is rnade for considering ttie case of the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided, in accor'dcnce with lavu, within o period of three weeks from •tiie date of receipt of the reDresentation. In yiew of the aboye statement made by leorned counsel qspearing for the respondents/State, learned counsel appear'ing for the petitioner submits that nothing survives in this matt-er. In the mecsntime, status quo as obtained today shai! be maintained till disposa! of the representation. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Certified copy as per rules. Satish K.Agnihom Judge ^AA*A-