IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2008 / 30TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 21853 of 2008(B) -------------------------- OPMV.5/2004 of MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, KALPETTA .................... PETITIONER: ------------ M.KHADEEJA, W/O.MOIDEEN, MALIYEKKAL HOUSE, K.S.E.B KUNNU, K.S.E.B ROAD, KANIYAMBETTA (PO). BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE SEBASTIAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD., M.G.T BUILDING, KALPETTA NORTH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J ----------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.21853/2008 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT The petitioner sought review of Ext.P1 award and that was rejected by the Tribunal by Ext.P4. The reason stated in Ext.P4 is that, since Ext.P1 award is based on a compromise between the parties and the amount was deposited on that basis, the review sought for by the petitioner cannot be accepted. True, as contended by the counsel for the petitioner, Ext.P1 does not appear to be a case where the matter was settled in an Adalat, but however the fact remains that, Ext.P1 shows that it was a compromise award. If that be so, the grounds urged by the petitioner in Ext.P3 cannot be made use of to review the award. I do not find anything erroneous in Ext.P4. Writ Petition fails and is dismissed. vi ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE 2 vi.