\)! Writ Petition i'S) No. 1.181 of200| PetltiQner Smt. Sheila Mishra, D/o. Chandra Bhuv/an, aged abput 36 years, r/o, Banki IMongra, Mongra Basti Thana Banki I'ylongra, District Korba(CG). ' Respondents 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through Coiiector, Korba, Korba (CG). 2) iViunicipal Corporation, -through Commissioner, Korba(CG). Project officer, integrated Chiid Deveiopment Project, Korba (Urban), District Korba (CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of|i SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotrs, J. Present: '. Laiit Jangde, Advscate for the petitioner. '. Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. (Passed on this 28th day of February, 2009) With the consent of learned counse! for both the parties, the matter is heard finaity. 2) Learned counsel appearing for fhe petitioner submits that being aggrieved by the order dated 7-4-2008 (Annexure P/1) passed by the respondent No.2/Commissioenr, Municipa! Corporation, Korba,, the petitioner has preferred an appea! before the Coliector, Korba on 14-5-2008 (Annexure P/3). During the proceedings, the Co!iectoc directed the respondent No.3/Project Officer, integrated Chiid Deveiopment Project, Korba to enquire about ths complai.nt made against the petitioner and submit a report thereof. in compliance of the direction given by the Coliector, the 'respondent No.3 has suhmitted the enqulry report. It appears that the report is in favour of the petitioner. Learned counsei further submits that the pefitioner has made severai applications for expeditittus heanng. j )H -2^ 3) Be that as it may, in normal course, this court shouid not interfere with the judicial/quasi judicial proceedings of the authorities below. However, in the facts of the case, if an applicatlon is made for expeditious hearing, the Collector, Korba, may consider the same sympatheticaily, in accordance with iaw. 4) !n view of the foregoing, this petition Is disposed of. Consequently, I.A.No.1 also stands disposed of. ; Sd/- SatisfaK.Agnihotri Judge • la