HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3684 OF 2011 ORDER: Though the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent-Insurance Company has put up a very brave fight opposing the condonation of delay, and sought to sustain the order passed by the learned District Judge at Khammam in dismissing I.A.No.2480 of 2006 in MATOP No.1623 of 2003, pointing out that the petitioners have no manner of interest to prosecute the matter promptly and with due diligence and they are only adopting delay tactics, but nonetheless, I feel that ends of justice require condonation of delay in the matter as the petitioners are the claimants and given a chance, they might prosecute their claim with necessary diligence henceforth. Further, the claim arose out of a fatal motor accident involving the wife of an illiterate first claimant. Therefore, taking a compassionate view in the matter, I set aside the order passed in I.A.No.2480 of 2006 in MATOP No.1623 of 2003 and allow the said I.A. and restore the MATOP to the file of District Court, Khammam, so that the matter can be examined on merits and the appropriate orders passed thereon. 2. The civil revision petition is allowed. But, without costs. _____________________________________ Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao 05-09-2011 SP HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3684 OF 2011 05-09-2011 SP