CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11200 OF 2010 :{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: AUGUST 10, 2011 Satpal .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. Shilak Ram Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. Mr.Rathee has handed over a copy of the reply in Court, which is taken on record. Mr.Rathee further submits that as per the reply filed, the seniority of the petitioner has been fixed at No.812 by considering his date of joining from the date of regularization i.e. 1.11.1986. The new seniority has now been fixed in accordance with order, Annexure R-1. It is further stated that pay of the petitioner is re-fixed by the Executive Engineer vide order, Annexure P-2. Since the relief claimed in the writ petition has been CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.11200 OF 2010 :{ 2 }: granted, the writ petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. If the petitioner still has any grievance left, he may file a representation before the respondents, which shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. August 10, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE