IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12619 of 2007 SMT.MANJU KUMARI, wife of Lalo Sutihar, resident of village Onahi Muslim Tola, P. S. Gualpara, District Madhepura… Petitioner. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR through, the Secretary Department of Social Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director, Directorate of Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, Madhepura. 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Madhepura. 5. The Sub-divisional Magistrate, Madhepura. 6. Block Development Officer, Gualpara. 7. Child Development Project Officer, Gualpara. 8. Executive Magistrate, Madhepura. 9. Smt. Sunita Kumari wife of Nutu Jha @ Brahmanand Jha, resident of village Noher, P. S. Gualpara, District Madhepura. … Respondents. ----------- 2. 18.12.2009. Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application reads as follows:- “i) That this writ application is being filed against convening another meeting of the Aam Sabha of beneficiaries of ward no. 11 of Gualpara Gram Panchayat to select Anganbari Sevika after selection of the petitioner vide meeting dated 3.6.07 and also against the selection of respondent Sunita Devi as Anganbari Sevika, belongs to different ward than the ward of the beneficiary. This writ application is also being filed for commanding the respondents not to allow respondent Sunita Devi to get consequential benefit out of her alleged selection as Anganbari Sevika on the basis of alleged meeting dated 19.6.07.” With reference to the aforementioned reliefs, counsel for the petitioner would 2 submit that the petitioner intends to move the Collector of the District by filing a compact representation. In the opinion of this court, recourse chosen by the petitioner seems to be correct inasmuch as the scheme for appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika itself envisages the redressal of grievance pertaining to selection/appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika in the first instance by the Collector of the District. That being so, this court would give liberty to the petitioner to file a compact representation which, if filed along with this order, will be disposed within the time limit fixed by the State Government in the Circular dated 10.12.2009 by a reasoned order after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, respondent no. 9 and the representative of concerned gram panchayat. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of. kanchan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)