IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 24TH JUNE 2008 / 3RD ASHADHA 1930 RP.No. 545 of 2008(I) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.4491/2008 Dated 07/02/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/2ND RESPONDENT IN WPC: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), ALAPPUZHA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.A.G. ANEETHA RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER & IST RESPONDENT IN WPC: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DINESAN.R., S/O.RAMAN, MEMBER NO.12139, NIKARTHIL, NEDUMBRAKKADU, CMC 5, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. 2. THE ADMINISTRATOR, CHERTHALA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.1688 (UNIT INSPECTOR, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, CHERTHALA) CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. M. SASINDRAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P.545/2008 in W.P.(C).4491/2008-I2008- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 24th day of June, 2008. O R D E R 1.Heard the learned Special Government Pleader for Co-operation quite in extenso. 2.This is a petition filed seeking review of the judgment dated 7-2-2008. 3.All that has been done as per the judgment sought to be reviewed is to direct the conduct of election to the committee of a society which was placed under the control of an administrator on 17-1-2007 on alleged loss of quorum of the committee. Standing by any principle relating to co-operation, and the democratic concept of a co- operative society, it is not for the Joint Registrar or for the State to insist perennial continuance of a co-operative society under the RP545/2008 -: 2 :- control of an administrator. It is noticed that the Joint Registrar had filed a writ appeal against the judgment sought to be reviewed and that writ appeal was withdrawn. It is also noticed that even the administrator had filed a writ appeal which was ultimately withdrawn. I do not find any ground to invoke the power of review in writ jurisdiction. The review petition fails. The same is accordingly dismissed. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/280608