IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 4398 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.7.2011 ... Umesh Uppal ................Petitioner vs. M/s Jindal Auto Distributors and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Namit Gautam, Advocate for the petitioner ... K.C. Puri, J. The grievance ventilated in the present petition is that the rent petition filed on the basis of personal necessity is pending since 2009 and no effective steps have been taken. This Court in CR No. 302 of 2010 titled as 'Sandeep Ghai vs. Neeraj Malhotra' (Annexure P-2) had issued directions to the subordinate Courts, in which it is mentioned that every petition based upon an averment of personal necessity or a petition filed by a specified landlord would be disposed of within six months of the filing of the same. It has been further observed in that ruling that for expeditious disposal, the Judicial Courts shall have to accord noticeable and compulsive priority to those cases. So, in these circumstances, the petition stands disposed of with the observation that the Rent Controller shall adhere to the directions issued in the abovesaid case. ( K.C. Puri ) 22.7.2011 Judge chugh