1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION L.P.A. NO.349 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4891 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.342 OF 2004 IN L.P.A. 349 OF 2004 Shri Arjun B. Thick & Ors. .. Appellants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH L.P.A. NO.350 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4898 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.343 OF 2004 IN L.P.A. 350 OF 2004 Smt.Latabai R.Pangarkar & Ors. .. Appellants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents WITH L.P.A. NO.351 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4889 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.344 OF 2004 IN L.P.A. 351 OF 2004 2 Shri Sohanlal Ayodhyaprasad Gupta .. Appellants Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents None for the appellant Mr.R.M.Patne, A.G.P. for the respondent no.1 to 4 Mr.A.C.Singh i/b Mr.A.D.Yadav for the respondent no.6 Mr.G.D.Utangale for the respondent no.7 CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL CORAM : J.N.PATEL & & & SMT.R.S.DALVI, JJ. SMT.R.S.DALVI, JJ. SMT.R.S.DALVI, JJ. DATED : 2ND APRIL, 2007 DATED : 2ND APRIL, 2007 DATED : 2ND APRIL, 2007 P.C.: 1. Heard. 2. None present for the appellants. 3. The appellants have filed these Letters Patent Appeals impugning the judgment of the learned single Judge which was delivered as a common judgment in group of petitions on 22.06.04. 4. We find that the learned single Judge has protected the rights of the original petitioners 3 who were the appellants before this court. 5. The factual matrix relates to the rehabilitation of the petitioners under the Slum Rehabilitation Act and all the appellants have been provided accommodation in transit camp in Khandwala Complex. The learned single Judge has observed that it is made clear that none of the petitioners will be forcibly evicted unless suitable tenements in camp no.4 is made available to each of the petitioners before this court who have already found to be eligible for alternate accommodation. 6. We, therefore, do not find that the learned single Judge has committed any error or illegality to call for interference. Therefore the Letters Patent Appeals are dismissed. All interlocutory applications / orders are dismissed as infructuous. ( SHRI J.N. PATEL, J ) ( SHRI J.N. PATEL, J ) ( SHRI J.N. PATEL, J ) ( SMT.R.S.DALVI, J ) ( SMT.R.S.DALVI, J ) ( SMT.R.S.DALVI, J )