c^- IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C. N0. 3 XSbl^t01' In W.P. fSI No. 643/2005 e%1't"&a AA APPLICANT ^:^ ^^^^ t^.••".'.. C,»j0 ••'' |.,.,.\'*1' ^^^^^*'v ^' Pyarelal, S/o Sadaram Mehara ( Scheduled caste ), aged about 48 years, Laboratory Attendant, -Govt. Pt. J.L.N. Arts & Science College, Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS ^\ '% XM8ii!« 1 •' '• ^ .^j NON-APPLICANTS 1. The Principal, Govt. Pt. J.L.N. Arts & Science College, Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 2. The Additional Director Higher Education Raipur, Bastar Division, Hostel Road, Government Science College, Raipur 3. TheState of M.P. through the Secretary, Higher Education Department, Ballabh Bhawan, Bhopal APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P. fSlN0. 643/2005. DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION r-.*r ;,ia 8 ^. %»^/A^ v'\GH.COURT QF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR APPUCANT NON-APPLICANT .C.C. No.03of2011 Pvai-elal. VERSUS •llie Principal & Others. APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P.(S)No. 643/2005. DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION. SB: Hon'ble Sfari Satish K^Agmhotn, J. Present: Shri R.K.Tiwari, Advocate for the applicant. Shri A.V.Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. >th (Passed oa 20"' day of Jaaua-)', 2011) I.A. No. 1, this is an application for condonation ofdelay in filing the restoration application. 1. Leamed counssi appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner eame to know about the order passed by this Court only on 11.11.2010. Thereafter, he had taken steps to file tius application for restoration, at the earliest. Accordingly, fhe application Ibr restoration was filed on 16.11.2010. Shri Shamia further submits that the counsel for the applicaiit could not appear on account of bona fide mistake. therefore, Writ Petition(S) No. 643/2005, which was dismissed on 07.10.2009, may be restored to its tile. 2. On verification, it is found that a copy of tlie order dated 7.10.2009, passed in W.P.(S) No. 643/2005, was not sent to fhe Detitioner. desuite a clear direction of this Court. Thus, the !-.••• fe. ^. ~"t-^'..,-^:^^i'•y explanation oftered by the applicant seems to be satisfactoiy. Delay is condoned. 3. Reasonable and sufBcient cause has been shown. Writ Petition (S) No. 643/2005, is restored to the original file. 4. A eopy of this order be placed bn record of the original writ petition aad the same be listed for hearing. 5. Resistn' is directed to take appropriate disciplinary action against the official/employe'e who faas tailed to comply with the order dated 7.10.2009, whereunder it was clearly directed to send a copy ofthe order to the petitioner, forthwith. 6. A coov oftbis order be sent to the Registrar General lor necessarv compliance, forthwith. Sd/- SatisbK.Agi Judge