DBSAW NO.815/08. { 1 } IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR. J U D G M E N T 1) D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.815/2008. IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1214/2008. Shankar and another Vs. The State of Rajasthan and others 2) D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.819/2008. IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1215/2008. Braham Dutt Vs. The State of Rajasthan and others 3) D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.820/2008. IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1213/2008. Sunder Lal and others Vs. The State of Rajasthan and others 4) D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.821/2008. IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1218/2008. Phoolwati Vs. The State of Rajasthan and others Date of Judgment:- May 27, 2008. QUORUM HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NARAYAN ROY HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Mr. Ashok Gaur for the appellants. Mr. R.K. Mathur for the respondents. ***** BY THE COURT : DBSAW NO.815/08. { 2 } All these appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The land acquisition proceedings which attained finality in the year 1990, could not be materialized as possession of the land was not delivered. The matter went upto the Supreme Court and acquisition proceedings were found to be valid and the order of the authority passing award was affirmed. A dispute however was raised in writ application before the learned Single Judge that since compensations have not been received by the awardees nor possession has been taken, the matter requires fresh consideration for rehabilitation of the aggrieved persons or to regularize their possession over the land in question. Learned Single Judge of this Court noticing the relevant facts and also the order of Supreme Court, refused to defer the matter however, he directed the writ petitioners to make representations with the U.I.T. to provide them house site or shop site on reasonable sizes to these persons whose residential house or place of business were acquired in the acquisition proceedings. The representations were directed to be decided within a month by the authorities. DBSAW NO.815/08. { 3 } We are informed that pursuant to the directions aforesaid of the learned Single Judge, appellants filed their representations. The representations were processed and offers were given to them to have the lands on reserve price for residential or business purpose. The offers given by the U.I.T. however have not been accepted by the appellants so far giving rise to these appeals to re-consider the matter afresh. Mr.Ashok Gaur, counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants submitted that due to the discriminatory attitude of the authorities, appellants are not in a position to pay exorbitant charges asked by the U.I.T. It is submitted that quite a different treatment has been meted out to some other persons and, therefore, the appellants are also required to be treated alike. The matter rests with the authorities and the awardees. Since the acquisition proceedings attained finality, in our view, the matter need not be allowed to be racked up before this Court to re-consider the matter on merit. The doors are still open for the appellants to approach the authorities for amicable settlement about the alternative sites and the matter may be decided in between the parties in accordance with law. At the same time, it will not be proper for this Court to DBSAW NO.815/08. { 4 } issue any direction to the authorities either to act on the circulars of the State Government or to facilitate regularization of the lands as claimed by the appellants. For the reasons aforementioned, therefore, we do not find any merit in these appeals which are dismissed without costs. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. (NARAYAN ROY), CJ. anil