( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.1758 OF 2006 SUIT NO.1758 OF 2006 SUIT NO.1758 OF 2006 Kores (India) Ltd. ...Plaintiffs V/s. Arvind Nath Naik ...Defendant None present. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 3rd December, 2008. DATED : 3rd December, 2008. DATED : 3rd December, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . None for the Plaintiffs. 2. Nothing is placed before the Court to show as to what steps have been taken to serve the Defendant. Even today nobody is present on behalf of the Plaintiffs to show the proof of service. This goes to show that the Plaintiffs are not interested in prosecuting the Suit. 3. Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. ( 2 ) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)