rp a IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 569 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO. 569 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO. 569 OF 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL (L) NO. 978 OF 2006 (L) NO. 978 OF 2006 (L) NO. 978 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1535 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 1535 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 1535 OF 2004 M/s. Haldyn Glass Ltd. .. Appellants. V/s. S.T.Murugan & Anr. .. Respondents. Mr.V.P.Vaidya for Appellants. . Mr.R.D.Bhat for Respondents. . CORAM CORAM CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND ANOOP ANOOP ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. V.MOHTA, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : 11th DECEMBER, 2007. : 11th DECEMBER, 2007. : 11th DECEMBER, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- . Mentioned not on board. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellants and the learned Counsel for the Respondents. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit in support thereof. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause is made out for condoning 82 days delay in filing the above appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ANOOP (ANOOP (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) V. MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)