1 APEAL.829-2010 acd IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 829 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra ..Appellant. Vs. Gyansagar Rajkaran Pandey ..Respondent. -- Mrs. A.S. Pai, APP for the State. Mr. Samir Vaidya, for Respondent. -- CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U. D. SALVI, JJ. JANUARY 18, 2011. P.C.: Heard Mrs. Pai, the learned APP for the Appellant-State. 2. In Sessions Case No.741 of 2007, two accused came to be tried for the offences punishable under Sections 324, 342, 504, 302 read with Section 34 of IPC, and accused no.1 was convicted and sentenced for the offence punishable under Section 304(ii) of IPC. Whereas both the accused have been acquitted for the offences punishable under Sections 504, 324, 342 and 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. Accused no.1 has been sentenced for seven years for the offence under Section 304(ii) of IPC. 2 APEAL.829-2010 3. The appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra against the order of acquittal against both the accused has already been admitted by us. Under these circumstances, we do not see any reason to admit this appeal for enhancement of sentence of accused no.1. 4. Hence, this appeal is dismissed in limine. (U. D. SALVI,J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE,J.)