HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETmON (227) No. 27 of2009 PETITIONER : Krishna Kumar Nagwajisi s/o Ram Singli Nagwanslii, aged 32 yeai's, R/b Ring Road No. 1, Village Gondwara, PO Sarora- Distt. Raipur \ VERSUS RESPONDENT •. Regional Transport Authority, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) PETITION LTNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA SB:Hon'MeS}mSafishK.AgnihGM^J, Present: Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashaiik Thakur, Panel Lawyei' for the State/respondents. ORALORDER (Passed on 17m day of Febmary, 2009) 1. Leamed coimsel appearmg for the petitioner submits that the Regional Transport Authority- Raipur has passed the impugned order contrary to the order dated 10th November, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 6262/2008 wherein it was clearly obsei'ved by this Court that for two different routes, two permits on two separate applications, are to be issued. Learned counsel lurther submits that he has made two applications- but one pemiit for two routes has beeii issued. Thus, it is violative of the order dated 10tla November, 2008. 2. Slii'i Thakur, leamed counsel appearing for the respondent submits that there is a mistake in the order passed by the respondent. It is admittedly cotitrary to the order dated 10.11.2008. 3. In view of the above- the respondent is directed to consider the applications for issumg two permits on two different routes, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. One pemiit camiot be gi'anted for two different routes. The petitioner may file a fresh application, ifso advised. • 4. Accordingly- the petition stasids disposed of 5. Consequently, I.A. No. 1, for mterim relief, also stands disposed of. Ajnit Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge