*.. 81 ^ IN THE HIGHCOURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 1 Writ Petition NoASo3/2006 Sing^S I'Oi PETITIONER ^y^ ^••' s^'^y :]^ V. S. Kashyap, aged V about67 years, Retd. Subedar[A] Head Clerk,4th Battalion.Commandant, Chhattisgarh Armed Force Mana, Raipur. R/0 House N0.324, Maitri Nagar,Near Sundar Nagar,P.O.:Sundar Nagar, Raiour. Versus RESPONDENTS 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Home [Police], Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Govt.of C.G., Raiour. 2. The Director General of Police, Police Head- Quarter, Chhattisgarh, Raiour. 3. The Director, Treasury Accounts & Penslon, Raipur. WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA THE HIGH CQURT OELCHHATTISGARH AT BLLASHJR W.P. N^, 1303^f2006 • Petitioner V.S. Kashyap Vs. Respondents The State of Chhattisgarh & others Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justfce Satish K. Agniliotri Shri Alok Bakshi, couasel for fhe petitioner, Shri V.V. S. Moorthy, Deputy Advocate General wifh Siat. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govenmieut Advocate for the respondents. ORAL ORDBR (25thMan;h, 2006) 1. Leamed counsel for the petitioner subuuts that the petitioner has filed representatious to the authorities, seeking fbr ideatical reUef, wbich has been prayed for iu fhis petition. Leamed counsel further submits that the respondents inay be directed to consider his representations dated 8.8.2005 (Annexure P/6) and 20.9.2005 (Aunexure P/7) wifhin the stipulated time, to which leamed coiinsel for the respondents has no objection. 2. In fhe event, the representations, as stated above, are pendmg consideration before the respondents authorities, the respondents are directed to consider and decide the sanac, ia accordance with law, witTiiTi a period of scc weeks froni the date of receipt/production ofacopy oftbis order. 3. In view of the foregoii^, fhe writ pctition staads disposed of. No order as to costs. Ceitified copy, as per Rules Bablu Sd/- SatishKAgnihotri Judge