THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.11811 of 2005 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking a Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in issuing notice dated 28.05.2005, directing the petitioner to remove the unauthorized constructions raised by him in Sy.No.638/1/B of Mahabubabad Gram Panchayat, Warangal District, as arbitrary and illegal. According to the petitioner, she is the absolute owner and possessor of two plots admeasuring 680 sq. yards and 484 sq. yards situated in Sy.No.638/1/B of Mahabubabad Gram Panchayat limits, Warangal District, having purchased the same from one Samala Susheela and others under two registered sale deeds on 12.09.2002. Thereafter, she submitted an application dated 14.09.2002 before the respondent, requesting to accord permission to construct building in the plot admeasuring 680 sq yards, and also another application on the very same day i.e., 14.09.2002, requesting permission to construct sheds in the plot admeasuring 484 sq. yards. The petitioner states that so far as plot admeasuring 680 sq. yards is concerned, permission was accorded to her and she raised constructions therein. It is the case of the petitioner that as no permission was granted with regard to plot admeasuring 484 sq. yards, she submitted another application dated 02.09.2003, requesting permission to construct shed in the plot admeasuring 484 sq. yards, but the same is not considered. While so, the respondent issued impugned notice dated 28.05.2005, directing the petitioner to remove the unauthorised structures raised by her in Sy.No.638/1/B. The grievance of the petitioner is that, having waited for a period of three years from the date of submission of her application for permission to construct shed, she raised sheds in the plot admeasuring 484 sq. yards under deemed permission, therefore, the action of the respondent in issuing the impugned notice directing her to remove the unauthorised structures is arbitrary and illegal. While admitting the writ petition on 06.06.2005, the respondent was directed not to demolish the sheds erected by the petitioner in the plot admeasuring 484 sq. yards in Sy.No.638/1/B of Mahabubabad Gram Panchayat, Warangal District. In spite of admitting the writ petition and granting the interim orders way back in the year 2005, the respondent has not filed counter affidavit. Heard the learned counsel. Admittedly, the impugned notice has been issued without considering the application dated 14.09.2002 submitted by the petitioner. Thus, on this ground alone I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondent to consider the application dated 14.09.2002 submitted by the petitioner and also to consider the issue as to whether the benefit of deemed permission can be extended to the petitioner in view of pendency of the application, dated 14.09.2002, filed by her, and pass appropriate orders within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till this exercise is completed, the subject constructions raised by the petitioner shall not be demolished. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order to costs. _____________ C.V.RAMULU,J 27.01.2011 V V