IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44849 of 2010 MADAN KUMAR @ CHINTU AND ORS. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 22.12.2010 Petitioners are languishing in custody since 23.08.2010 in a case registered under Sections 292, 293, 294, 420, 468, 471, 120B of the I.P.C. and Sections 66-5/67/67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. It is alleged that informant came to know that M.K. Mobile Centre was using the photographs of the niece of the informant through internet. This information was also verified by the informant through internet. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have petty mobile repairing shop and during investigation it has not been verified that actually who used the photographs of the niece of the informant on the internet though witnesses have supported the prosecution case. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the accused persons have invaded the privacy of the informant and have defamed the niece by using her photographs in C.D. and at herself. From the impugned order, it appears that during investigation, it has not been found that actually 2 who pested the photographs of the niece of the informant. Since chargesheet has been submitted, let the petitioners namely 1. Madan Kumar @ Chintu 2. Mahesh Kumar @ Mantu 3. Jhantu, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Lakhisarai(Kawaiya O.P.) P.S. Case No. 409 of 2010. Learned Court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners, if the petitioners get involved in similar nature of offence or if they fail to appear on three consecutive dates during trial. Shageer (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)