HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SVI.A.fONo. 358/2007 ::r" ITil::!:: ;.f Sinale Bench: AppeiSant Claimant ResDondents Non-claimants Priya Hon'bSe Shri DJIJD RaosahebDeshmukh,J^ Rakesh Kumar Patwa S/o Ramlai, aged about 25 years, R/o Rambagh, Dhamtari, Tahsil and Di'strict Dhamtarj (CG) VERSUS 1. Bhushan Sahu S^o Shri Radheshyam Sahu, R/o Gokujpur Dhamtari, Tahsil and District Dhamtari (CG) 2. JheBranch iVianagelr, The Un'rted jndia Insurance Company Ltd. Krushna Complex,| l Floor, Kactihari Chowk, Raipur (CG)! Present: Shri Sunil Sahu, learned counsel forjthe appeliant. ^RALORDER" (Passed on23rt March, 2007) 1. Heard on I.A. No. 01/2007 condonation of delay of 445 days in preferring this misceilaneous appeal. 2. The award was passed by the learned IVI.A.CT, Dhamteri on ^ •...1 • '' • 1;1 . . ! • •: •' ^ f 17.8.2005. The appellant herein was duiy represented by the counsel. Copy of the award was applied for on 23.8.2005 and was recelved on • 29.8.2005. However, thereafter, the appeal was filed as !ate as on 13.3.2007. The oniy ^ground mentioned by the appeliant in the application is that the appe!Sant met wlth the lower Court counsel for the first time in the ,month of February, 2007 and came to know that the appeai has not been filed. This in no manner constitutes suffident ground for condonatlon of deiay. The appellant remained in complete slumber for a period of a year and half after receiving the copy of the award. The affidavit of the appeilant is aSso siJent. The affidavit of the counsei who represented the appeliant |n the lower Court has aiso aot been fjled. Thus, no ground for condonlng the delay is made out. . * 3. i.A. No. 01/2007 for condonation of delay is dismissed. As resujt, this misc^jianeous appeal also stands dismlssed. J^^">»kb \, \^^9sy