1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.W.NO.2755 of 2011 in WRIT PETITION NO. 4393 of 2011. Ramkrishna Bapurao Dhawade ..vs.. The State of Mah. through the Secretary, Socialk Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others. =-=-==-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. A.D.Mohgaonkar, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.L.H.Kothari, AGP for respondent no.1 to 3. C ORAM : D.D.SINHA AND A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : 16th NOVEMBER, 2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents nos. 1 to 3. Civil application No.2755 of 2011 is moved by the petitioner seeking permission to impleade appropriate Welfare Officer of Nagpur Division instead of present respondent no.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the order impugned is passed by the Divisional Social Welfare Officer, however, the petitioner has impleaded District Social Welfare Officer, who is respondent no.3 and therefore, seeks permission to implead the Divisional Social Welfare Officer as party respondent. In the circumstances, the application is 2 allowed. The petitioner is permitted to substitute the name of appropriate Welfare Officer in place of respondent no.3 forthwith. The Civil application is disposed of accordingly. Issue notice to the Divisional Welfare Officer i.e. respondent no.3, returnable on 2/12/2011. Service by Hamdast is permitted. JUDGE JUDGE. chute