IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 22ND JULY 2011 / 31ST ASHADHA 1933 LA.App..No. 298 of 2011(D) -------------------------------- LAR.42/2008 of SUB COURT, KASARAGOD .................... APPELLANT(S):(REFERRING OFFICER)/RESPONDENTS ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(LAND ACQUISITION), KASARAGOD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,KASARAGOD. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,PWD (ROADS DIVISION),KASARAGOD. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT. T.T.JOSEPHINA RESPONDENT(S): -------------------- IBRAHIM,S/O.MAMMUNHI,PERUMBALA KADAVU, PERUMBALA VILLAGE AND POST,KASARAGOD TALUK, REP.BY HIS GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER M.ABDULLA,S/O.M.MAMMU,PERUMBALA KADAVU,PERUMBALA VILLAGE,PO PERUMBALA,KASARAGOD TALUK. PIN 671121. BY ADV. SRI.ASWIN GOPAKUMAR SMT.KALA G.NAMBIAR THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- LAA No.298 of 2011 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd July, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. Even though several grounds have been raised in this appeal and Smt.Josephina, the learned Government Pleader addressed serious arguments based on the grounds, having gone through the impugned judgment and having considered the submissions of Mr.Aswin Gopakumar the learned counsel for the respondent, we are of the view that the enhancement granted by the learned subordinate judge under the impugned judgment is in no way excessive. We approve the same. Hence the appeal is dismissed. SD/- PIUS C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE SD/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE css/ TRUE COPY P.S.TO JUDGE