1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 342 OF 2007. IN SUIT NO. 3326 OF 2006 Ali Gulam Roshan ... Plaintiff. Vs. Faisal Aftab and ors. ... Defendants. And. Tejas Kirtikumar Salot & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. Jagdish R. Chomal for plaintiff. None for Defendants. None for Respondents. CORAM : A.A.SAYED, J. DATE : September 9, 2009. P.C. 1. The learned Counsel for plaintiff states that the order dated 17.7.2009 as regards service has been complied with. 2. The plaintiff is the owner of the suit property. By this Chamber Summons, the plaintiff seeks to bring on record the respondents as party defendants, as according to him the defendants have allegedly sold the suit property to the respondents. Learned Counsel for the plaintiff states that the suit property was sold a couple of months prior to filing of the suit, however, plaintiff was not aware of this fact. It appears that on the earlier occasion the respondents were represented by an Advocate who appeared in the matter. Today, however, none appears on behalf of the respondents or defendants. 3. In the circumstances Chamber Summons made absolute in terms of 2 prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within a period of three weeks from today. Amended plaint be served. 4. Learned Counsel for the plaintiff does not press for other reliefs. Chamber Summons to stand disposed of. [A.A.Sayed, J.]