IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11843 of 2010 BHOLA MAHTO, son of Late Ram Khelawan Mahto, resident of Village Manikpur Sirsia, P.O. Sirsia, P.S. Kanti, Distt.- Muzaffarpur. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Excise Superintendent, Muzaffarpur. 4. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. 5. The District Provident Fund Officer, Muzaffarpur. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 28.7.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State. The petitioner retired on 28th of February, 2010 from the post of Excise Constable under respondent no.3. His grievance is that he has not been paid the correct amount against leave encashment and also no payment has been made towards the group insurance as well as the provident fund dues, besides the arrears of difference of salary as indicated in the representation dated 17th of July, 2010, contained in Annexure 2. Learned counsel for the State submits that the representation of the petitioner is not clear with regard to the entitlement of the petitioner. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Excise Superintendent, Muzaffarpur (respondent no.3) as also a separate representation before the District 2 Provident Fund Officer, Muzaffarpur (respondent no.5) with regard to the payment of the provident fund dues. In case such separate representations are filed with regard to the respective claims stating distinctly the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the representations of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representations, so that the outstanding grievances of the petitioner may be settled. However, if any of the claims or part of the claims is not being paid, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)