HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 3771 OF 2011 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition has been filed aggrieved by the Order dated 17.06.2011 passed in I.A.No. 644 of 2011 in O.P.No. 1340 of 2009 by the II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Petitioners herein are the respondents 1 and 2 in O.P.No. 1340 of 2009, which has arisen out of a dispute relating to election to the Office Bearers of A.P. Olympic Association, which was scheduled on 21.6.2009, wherein the election process went on and the petitioners claimed to have been elected and their election is in dispute. Hence, petitioners herein filed I.A.No. 644 of 2011 under Order 28 Rule 17 r/w Section 151 CPC to recall PW-1 and PW-2 and put them questions regarding truth, admissions and validity of Ex. P1 to Ex. P17 (Ex. A1 to A-17) and pleadings of the main OP. The Court below dismissed that I.A with costs of Rs. 500/- each following the observations made by the Apex Court in SLP (Civil) Nos. 8591/2010 to 8593/2010. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the Court below while deciding the interim application has in fact decided the main OP itself and the same is contrary to the provisions of law. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and also perused the material made available on record. As seen from the record, in O.P. evidence on behalf of the petitioners’ side was completed and the matter was posted for the evidence on behalf of the respondents’ side. At that time with regard to certain contentions in interlocutory applications, the matter went upto Hon’ble Supreme Court vide SLP (Civil) Nos. 8591/2010 to 8593/2010, wherein the Supreme Court observed as under: “Heard the learned counsel for the parties. We are told that the plaintiffs’ evidence has been recorded. We request the trial court to take day-to-day proceedings of this matter and also direct the defendants to produce their evidence at their own responsibility so that the judgment can be delivered within one and a half months from today” Following the above observations made by the Supreme Court, the Court below dismissed the I.A with costs of Rs. 500/- each as there are no merits in the petition filed. Hence, I see no reasons to interfere with the order passed by the Court below. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J DATE: 23.09.2011 KA