IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.276 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: 27.5.2010 Amarjit Singh Forester ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana & Others …Respondents CORAM HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI Present: Mr.RS Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner Ms.Kavita Arora, AAG, Punjab for respondents no.1 to 4 Mr.KB Sidhu, Advocate, for respondent no.5 Permod Kohli, J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved of transfer order dated 28.8.2009 (Annexure P-1) whereby respondent no.5 was transferred in place of the petitioner at Block Yamnuna Nagar Range, Jagadhri, Yamnu Nagar shown to be a vacant post. It is stated that post shown to be vacant is in fact occupied by the petitioner. Learned counsel for respondent no.5 submits that respondent no.5 has no objection if the petitioner is retained at Block Yamnu Nagar Range, Jagadhri, Yamuna Nagar. In view of this statement, respondent no.2 will re-consider and re-examine the impugned order within four weeks. Till such re-consideration, the petitioner shall not be relieved from his present posting. Disposed of. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 27.5.2010 MFK CWP No.10585 of 2010 3 The petitioner is aggrieved of transfer order dated 28.8.2009 (Annexure P-1) whereby respondent no.5 was transferred in place of the petitioner at Block Yamnuna Nagar Range, Jagadhri, Yamnu Nagar shown to be a vacant post. It is stated that post shown to be vacant is in fact occupied by the petitioner. Learned counsel for respondent no.5 submits that respondent no.5 has no objection if the petitioner is retained at Block Yamnu Nagar Range, Jagadhri, Yamuna Nagar. In view of this statement, respondent no.2 will re-consider and re-examine the impugned order within four weeks. Till such re-consideration, the petitioner shall not be relieved from his present posting. Disposed of. (PERMOD KOHLI) JUDGE 27.5. 2010 MFK