IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.666 of 2009 ANIL KUMAR YADAV @ ANIL YADAV SON OF RAM SWARUP YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BERMI SIMARI,P.S.KADIRGANJ,DISTT.NAWADA Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.10636 of 2009 SHATISH PRASAD SON OF ISHWAR PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BALWAPAR,P.S.WARISALIGANJ,DISTT.NAWADA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 13.4.2009 Since both the above applications arise out of one and the same police case, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners seek bail in a case which has been registered for offences under Section 341,323 and 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant is the victim and it has been submitted that the case was lodged on account of some confusion. The reason given in the first information report is that the informant had taken Rs.300/- from Bhola Chauhan and when amount was not returned, kidnapping was done. The parties have compromised the matter and a compromise petition has been filed in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners of both the applications be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in Kashichak P.S.Case No. 54 of 2008. Tahir/- ( Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)