IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1837 OF 2006 PETITION NO.1837 OF 2006 PETITION NO.1837 OF 2006 Bharat Gulabsing Thakur...Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors..Respondents Mr. R.K. Mendadkar, for the Petitioner Mr. N. Pandit, AGP for Respondent No.1. CORAM: F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO REBELLO REBELLO & MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. JJ. JJ. DATE: 20th July,2006 P.C. . The petitioner has been selected for appointment by respondent No.3 against a reserved post. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner’s application before the Committee is pending since 26th September, 2005 and as that has not been decided the respondent No.3 is not issuing the letter of appointment. Considering the controversy we direct the Respondent NO.2 to decide the petitioner’s application which is pending since 26th September, 2005 within four months from today. If the Committee accepts the petitioner’s cast validity the respondent NO.3 thereafter to follow due process of law. With the above observation petition stands disposed of. (F.I. F.I. F.I. REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J) (MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J). J). J).