IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 735 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: February 01, 2011 Ram Singh and another .. Petitioners Vs. Satish and others .. Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) The petitioners have invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 20.11.2010 passed by the appellate court declining the application for grant of injunction. Admittedly, the parties are co-sharers in the suit land. Jamabandi for the year 2004-05 reveals that Bilsat father of the petitioners and Om Parkash son of Deep Chand (non petitioners) are recorded as joint owners on behalf of all co-sharers. Thus, when the petitioners being not shown in exclusive cultivating possession of the suit land and the father of the petitioners and others are in possession on behalf of other co-sharers can not be said to be in exclusive possession of the suit land and are not entitled to the discretionary relief of injunction. Dismissed. February 01, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge