*1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2917/2009 Gajanan Vasudeo Waikar. ..Applicant -VERSUS- The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent ............... Mr.Ajay A. Joshi, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms.S.D.Shinde, A.P.P., for the Respondent/State. ............... CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. Dated 01st October, 2009. PC:- 1 By the present application, the Applicant is seeking modification of the order dated 22.04.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur in Criminal Misc. Application No. 110/2009. By the said order, the application moved by the present Applicant under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for anticipatory bail came to be allowed, however, further direction is issued that after expiry of a period of two months, the Applicant shall appear before the Trial Court and file regular bail application. 2 The learned counsel for the Applicant seeks modification of the order dated 22.04.2009 by contending that the protection granted to the Applicant by allowing his application ought to be till filing of the charge sheet. Thus, a limited modification is asked for. 3 The learned APP has no objection for modifying the order restricting operation of the order till filing of the charge sheet. *2* 4 In that view of the matter, the order dated 22.04.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge shall operate till filing of the charge sheet. Thus, the following direction issued by the Additional Sessions Judge in the order dated 22.04.2009 shall stand deleted :- “After the expiry of two months from the date of this order, the applicant shall immediately appear before the trial Court and file regular bail application, which will be considered by the learned Judicial Magistrate F.C. at its own merits, without being influenced by the observations made in this order.” 5 The Application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. -sd- (A.P. Deshpande, J)