IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2007 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1929 RP.No. 495 of 2007(K) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.11861/2006 Dated 28/04/2006 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN W.P. : -------------------------------------------------- 1. SASIKALA, HSST PHYSICS (JUNIOR), D.V.M.N.N.M.H.S.S., MARANALLOOR. 2. RADHIKA RANI, T.S., HSST MATHEMATICS, D.V.M.N.N.M.H.S.S., MARANALLOOR. 3. SARMILA.S.V., HSST CHEMISTRY (JUNIOR), D.V.M.N.N.M.H.S.S., MARANALLOOR. 4. SURESH KUMAR K.C., HSST ENGLISH, NEW H.S.S. NELLIMOOD, TRIVANDRUM. 5. FEELA.K.J., HSST ECONOMICS (JUNIOR), ALEEMUL ISLAM HSS, PADOOR. 6. MATHEW V.SAMUEL, HSST PHYSICS (JUNIOR), ST.THOMAS H.S.S., ERUVELLIPRA. 7. JINY E.G., HSST CHEMISTRY, NATIONAL HSS, ENGANDYUR. 8. JISH.E.G., HSST MATHEMATICS, NATIONAL HSS, ENGANDIYUR. 9. JYMA K.PATANI, HSST CHEMISTRY, ST.SEBASTIAN'S HSS, VAZHITHALA. 10. LOVELY JACOB, HSST (PHYSICS), ST.JOHN'S MODEL HSS, NALAMCHIRA, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.PAULSON THOMAS RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS IN W.P.(C) ----------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCTION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDINGS, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.SHYSON P. MANGUZHA, GOVT. PLEADER. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J. ------------------------------- R.P. No. 495 OF 2007 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of June, 2007 O R D E R Heard Mr.Paulson Thomas, counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Shyson P. Manguzha, Government Pleader. It is seen that Ext.P7 judgment has been reviewed and substituted by Annexure (1) judgment in review. Under these circumstances my judgment dt.28.04.06 will stand reviewed to the extent of clarifying that the Director of Higher Secondary Education is to pass orders on the representation submitted by the writ petitioners on the basis of Annexure (1) judgment and not Exts.P7 and P7(a). The time frame for taking decision is extended by six weeks from today. PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE btt WPC 2