67#$- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELifl AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2438/2011 ARUN PATHAK & ORS Through: versus ..... Petitioners Mr. Anurag Dubey, Advocate with Petitiml.ers in person. STATE & ANR ..... Respondents r Through: Mr. C.L. Gupta, APP for the State · with SI Surender Sharma. Mr. Pritam Singh, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 with Respondent No. 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ORDER; 0/o 29.07.2011 Crl. 8714/2011 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M1.C. No. 2438/2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 358/2006 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS New Usmanpur, Delhi. The complainant!Respondent No. 2 Ms. Lalita is present in person. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the 'settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2/Complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent. As full and final settlement of all the CRL.M.C. 243812011 Page 1 of 2 I , Signing Date:22.08.2024 16:42:42 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified claims of 1the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. 1 has to pay 75 lakhs out of wHich lakh has already been paid to ber and have been paid to today in cash. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fad: that the parties have amicably resolved their differenqes of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful pl!lrpose will be seJ:]Ved in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Cbnsequently, FIR No. 358/2006 under Sections 498A/406/34 IFC at PS New Uslilanpur, Delhi and pr0ceedim.gs pursuant thereto are hereby 9uashed. Rarties, who are identified by their respective counsels, have signed this sheet in acknbwledgment of their statements made before tthis Court. The petition is disf>osed. Order dasti. MUKTA GUPTA, J. Page2 of2 4 Yl 1/ ( <:b I( ( "? \'{ )