HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 7163 of2007 PETITIONER : Nileshwar 1’rasad Chandrakm‘, S/o Shri Motilal' Chandrakar, aged 55 years, occupation— service, presently posted as Rural Agricuhural Extension Q$cer, Village Bhemi, Block Berla’ Tellsil — Berla, Disirict Durg (C.G.), R/o Village —‘ Bhemi, Block Berla, Tehsil — Berla, District Durg (C.G.) RESPONDENTS VERSUS . State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Agiculture, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director (Agriculture) State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Deputy Director (Agriculture), Durg (06.) 4. Sub-Divisional Officer (Agriculture), Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.) 5. Janpad Panchayat, Berla through its Chief Executive OEicer, Berla, Tahsil —— Berla, District Durg (CG) WRTT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Prent: Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. es Shri A.S.Kachhwaha, Govermnent Advocate for the State/respondent No. l to 4. Amit ORAL ORDER (Passed on (Bra day of December, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merit. However, learned counsel submits that the petitioner be granted liberty to make representation to the authorities concerned. In tum, the authorities concerned be directed to consider the said representation in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably Within a period of four weeks. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/State‘has no obj ection. Accordingly, in View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of with a direction to the concerned authorities to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner if any, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of representation. Sdl— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1F, k)s ‘