IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.118 of 2007 BRIJESH PATEL Versus ISHWAR CHANDRA PRASAD & ORS ----------- 05/ 16.07.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This petition has been filed on behalf of appellant-petitioner for review of order dated 17.05.2007, by which M.A. No. 119 of 2003 was dismissed. No doubt in the third line of third paragraph of the said order, `appellant’ has been typed in place of `applicant’, which is apparent from the order of the learned court below and hence the said order is modified only to the extent that in place of word `appellant’ mentioned in the third line of third paragraph of the said order, word `applicant’ has to be substituted and, accordingly, the said order is modified to the aforesaid extent. The said typographical error does not at all affect the order passed by this Court, in which it was specifically stated that the impugned order is with respect to only payment of interim compensation of Rs.50,000.00 and the said order is not a final order and it will be subject to the final result of claim case. In the said circumstances, I do not find any error apparent on the face of the record nor do I find any material or any reason to review the said order. By the said order, it is quite apparent that if the appellant-petitioner produces papers before the learned court below the court below will have to consider the same at the time of passing of the final order. MPS/ ( S. N.Hussain, J. )