IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3918 of 2010 KAMOD KUMAR KANCHAN Versus 1. The STATE OF BIHAR 2. Nidhi Jha ------ 4/ 06.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Complainant herself is present in Court. She was heard and what the allegations were levelled by her do not tally with the allegations made in the F.I.R. or by her lawyer, while the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that she is not ready to reside with husband making false allegations even about his career. Petitioner is working as an engineer and shown as broker for each and every time and she left Karnatka with her sweet will and at present, she is not ready to reside with him. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Sastri Nagar P.S. Case No. 371 of 2009, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Patna subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)