IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2008 / 10TH ASHADHA 1930 RP.No. 662 of 2008() ----------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN CRP.1250/2002 Dated 25/02/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/ PETITIONER: ---------------------------------------- BHARATHY MENON, D/O NALINI AMMA, KOCHATTIL HOUSE, CHERPU VILLAGE, PERUVANAM DESOM, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.T.N.MANOJ RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: -------------------------------------- 1. THALAPULLY SARASWATHY AMMA, W/O GOVINDANKUTTY MENON, KARAPPURATH HOUSE, PERUVANAM DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 2. GEETHA, D/O 1ST RESPONDENT, DO. DO. 3. RAJI @ RAJESWARI, D/O GOVINDANKUTTY MENON, KARAPPURATH HOUSE, URAKAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR, W/O RAMAKRISHNAN, KUNDUVARA HOUSE, CHEMBUKKAVU, THRISSUR. 4. SURESH, S/O GOVINDANKUTTY MENON, KARAPPURATH HOUSE, URAKAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI. H. SIVARAMAN. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: M.N. KRISHNAN, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P. 662 OF 2008 IN C.R.P. NO. 1258 OF 2002 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 1st day of July, 2008. O R D E R This review petition is preferred against the order of this Court in CRP Nos.930/02 and 1250/02. This Court disposed of both the CRPs. as dismissed. CRP 930/02 was preferred against an order in I.A.4792/95 and this Court held that there is a plan and report submitted by the Commissioner with the assistance of the Surveyor in O.S.561/84 and therefore it can be made use of. This Court also observed that if there is any difficulty to prove it then at that stage the party can file appropriate application for measurement of the property. 2. In the other CRP this Court held that for the very same relief another I.A. has been filed and that has been dismissed and therefore it need not be entertained. The interest of the party is protected and I have held that in case there is difficulty to look into the other document then party R.P. 662 OF 2008 IN C.R.P. NO. 1258 OF 2002 -:2:- has been given liberty to move the Court for appropriate reliefs. I do not find any error apparent on the face of the record which requires interference by this Court. Therefore the R.P. lacks merit and it is dismissed. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.