THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION NO.2327 OF 2006 Between : Gali Subba Raju, S/o. Gali Govinda Raju, R/o. 9-237, Dowleswaram, Rajahmundry Rural, East Godavari District. …... PETITIONER And 1. Gram Panchayat, Dowleswaram, rep. by its President, Dowleswaram, Rajahmudry Rural, East Godavari District, and another. …....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Y. Sudhakar Counsel for the respondents: Sri G. Elisha, S.C. for respondents. The Court made the following. ORDER: The petitioner, claiming to be the owner of an extent of Ac.1.00 of land situated in S.No.111/1 of Dowleswaram Village, Rajahmundry Rural. It is stated that he, along with his family members constructed a Small Scale Industry Unit, viz., Sri Vigneswara Engineering works, in the year 1971. He complains that on 28.01.2006 the employees of the 1st respondent, viz., the Gram Panchayat, Dowleswaram, visited the premises and tried to demolish the building constructed on the said land, without notice to the petitioners. Complaining that the said action on the part of the 1st respondent is not legal and apprehending that the construction would be demolished without due process of law, this writ petition has been filed for forbearing the respondents from demolishing the building except in accordance with law. Heard Sri Y. Sudhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri G. Elisha, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The 2nd respondent-Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Dowleswaram, has filed counter affidavit. The relevant portion of the same is as under. “It is respectfully submit that the Gram Panchayat never touched the property of the petitioner situated in R.S.No.111/1 of Dowleswaram village and we never touch the same in future also. On apprehension only the present writ petition was filed. We are no way concerned with the property of the petitioner situated in RS.No.111/1 and we are only concerned with the land in RS.No.104 admeasuring Ac.1.17 cents of land which was already demarcated by way of survey and handed over to the Health department. The writ petition is filed on mere apprehension and hence liable to be dismissed.” Thus the respondents are categorical in their statement that they have not made any attempt to demolish the building as alleged by the petitioner. In view of the above, no orders need be passed in this writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ NOUSHAD ALI, J. 15th December, 2010 Js.