IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9937 of 2010 1. BRAJ BHUSAN PRASAD, S/O LATE BIJULI PRASAD, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT,WORKS DIVISION,GOPALGANJ,DISTRICT- GOPALGANJ. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT,GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. SHRI MITHILESH, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WORKS DIVISION, GOPALGANJ, DISTRICT- GOPALGANJ. 4. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, RURAL DEPARTMENT,GOVT. OF BIHAR,PATNA. with CWJC No.2383 of 2009 BRAJ BHUSHAN PRASAD, , S/O LATE BIJULI PRASAD, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT,WORKS DIVISION,GOPALGANJ,DISTRICT- GOPALGANJ. . Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, RURAL WORKS DEPARTMENT,GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. ----------- 2. 17.08.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State as also for private respondent no. 3 in CWJC no. 9937 of 2010. Learned Counsel for the petitioner fairly acknowledges that pursuant to the fresh order dated 23.6.2010 passed in CWJC no. 9937 of 2010, the cause of action based on the order dated 3.10.21008 in CWJC No. 2383 of 2009 does not survive any more. CWJC No. 2383 of 2009 is accordingly disposed as infructuous. The petitioner is stated to be an employee of the Road Construction Department on deputation to the Rural Works Department. By order dated 23.6.2010 he has been repatriated by the Department of Deputation to his parent department. Having considered the submissions on behalf of the petitioner this Court is not satisfied that any legal ground has been made out to interfere with the order of repatriation dated 23.6.2010. If the petitioner is aggrieved his remedy lies in an appropriate representation to be considered by the authorities in their administrative wisdom. CWJC No. 9937 of 2010 stands disposed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)