IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28791 of 2009 KAMESHWAR RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 7.12.2009 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The only defence of petitioner is that before the incident his motorcycle was stolen for which he lodged F.I.R. also in my view, is not tenable as F.I.R. is lodged only after the incident and that also recording of the F.I.R of this case. Confession made by any of the co-accused before the police also in no case is for any avail otherwise petitioner’s motorcycle is used in loot of a Hero Honda motorcycle from the road. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. A.I (Mandhata Singh, J.)