IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2008 / 10TH BHADRA 1930 WP(C).No. 26201 of 2005(T) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ EX-GULF MALAYALI ASSOCIATION, KINS COMPLEX, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY AHAMMED PALLIYALIL, S/O. KUNHAVA @ ABDULLAKUTTY. BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION, NEW DELHI. 2. AIR PORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, RAJIVE GANDHI BHAVAN, SAFDARJANG AIR PORT, NEW DELHI-3, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 3. THE REGIONAL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR PORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA (NATIONAL AIR PORT DIVISION), MEENAMPAKKAM, CHENNAI. 4. THE AIRPORT DIRECTOR, AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, CALICUT. 5. S. SADANANDAN, KOTTRAKKAL HOUSE, P.O. ELATHUR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE FOR R5 SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN FOR R5 SMT.NISHA BOSE FOR R5 SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN SRI. AJITH KRISHNAN, ADDL.CGSC FOR R1 SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) FOR R2 TO R4 SMT.T.N.GIRIJA FOR R2 TO R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/09/2008, THE COURT ON 01/09/2008 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.26201/2005 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 : COPY OF PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWN THE PRESENT CAR PARKING AREA OF CALICUT AIRPORT. P2 : COPY OF RECEIPT FOR CAR PARKING ISSUED BY R4. P3 : COPY OF NEWS REPORT IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY DATED 27/08/2005. P4 : COPY OF REPORT IN MATHRUBHUMI DAILY DATED 22/08/2005. P5 : COPY OF NEWS REPORT APPEARED IN MATHRUBHUMI DAILY DATED 26/08/2005. P6 : COPY OF RECEIPT NO.472 DATED 18/09/2005. //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE. jg KURIAN JOSEPH, J. ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 26201 of 2005 ---------------------------------------------- Dated 1st September, 2008. J U D G M E N T Petitioner association approached this court aggrieved by the enhancement of parking fee. It is submitted that the enhancement was made without providing any additional facility. In view of the intervening developments in case the petitioner has still any grievance left, petitioner may approach the 4th respondent, in which case appropriate action in accordance with law in the matter will be taken expeditiously. The writ petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. tgs KURIAN JOSEPH, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.26201 of 2005 ---------------------------------------------- J U D G M E N T Dated 1st September, 2008.