IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.22344 of 2010 Urmila Devi Vs. The State of Haryana & another Present: Mr.Dalel Singh Nain, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has a grievance that the interviews have already been conducted and she did not come to know of the same as the interview schedule was changed. Counsel says that the representation filed by the petitioner is pending. The petitioner may pursue her representation, if so advised. The writ petition is dismissed as no case for interference is made out in view of the facts as pleaded. December 15, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE