IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No. 833 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.04.2011 Chet Ram ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present: - Mr. Ashok Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. 1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** ALOK SINGH, J (ORAL) Petitioner – Chet Ram, who is neither the complainant nor the accused – has moved an application before the trial Court requesting the trial Court that he may be examined as prosecution witness. His application was rejected vide impugned order dated 19.1.2008. Record reveals that neither Court has summoned the petitioner as Court witness nor prosecution has cited him as prosecution witness. On being asked repeatedly, as to whether third party can apply to the Court to examine him as prosecution witness without the consent of the prosecution, learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to reply. Dismissed. (Alok Singh) Judge April 06, 2011 R.S.