IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37285 of 2008 Manorma Devi, wife of Radhe Shyam Tiwari @ Munnu Tiwari, village Ram Kekai, PS Sheosagar, Dist. Rohtas – Petitioner. Versus State Of Bihar 2 15.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order, dated 7.6.2008 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Rohtas in Sheo Sagar Ps case No. 54/2001. The petitioner is the informant in this case. Cognizance has been taken under sections 380 and 352 of the Penal Code. The informant has made a prayer that cognizance ought to be taken under section 307 of the Penal Code on the basis of Annexure 5/1 to this petitioner. Annexure 5/1 is the report which says that the X-ray shows no abnormality. It appears that this is just a report of X-ray. There is no injury attached with the X-ray report. The Sessions Judge, on the other hand, has come to a finding that the injury report produced by the petitioner seems to be from a private doctor and on a page drawn from a exercise book. Be that as it may, this court finds that in view of Annexure 5/1, the petitioner has not been able to establish that there were injury on his person to warrant the court to take cognizance under sections 323, 324 and 307 of the Penal Code. This application is dismissed. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)