IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.597 of 2011 Suresh Yadav, Son of Prayag Yadav, resident of Village-Makata, Police Station- Chakai, District-Jamui.......................Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR.............Opposite Party. ----------- 2. 02.02.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No.39 of 2010 registered under Sections 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. It is alleged against the petitioner that he is partitioned from his father and recovery has been made from portion of father’s share. The impugned order reflects that the father has confessed complicity of this petitioner in the alleged offence. In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail of the petitioner if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail considering the fact that the father of the petitioner who was arrested from the spot, has already been granted bail. 2 With this observation, this application is disposed off. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)