1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4501 OF 2009 Office notes, office memoranda of Corum, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s Judge’s orders. Mr. S.G. Jadhawar Counsel for Petitioner. Mr. U.K. Patil, A.G.P. for State. .................... [ CORAM : K.K.TATED, J. ] DATE : 29/7/2009 PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr. S.G. Jadhawar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner and Mr. U.K. Patil, learned A.G.P. for State. 2. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Petitioner is challenging the Order dated 12/5/2006 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Wasmat, Tq. Wasmat, Dist. Hingoli. The learned counsel 2 appearing on behalf of petitioner pointed out that against the order dated 12/5/2006, the petitioner preferred Revision Petition under Clause 24 of the Maharashtra Schedule Commodities (Regulation & Distribution) Order, 1975 bearing Revision Petition No. 295 of 1996. The said Revision Petition is pending before the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad since 2006. He further pointed out that the appellate authority issued notice dated 22/5/2006 to the Respondent no. 3, Sub Divisional Officer, Wasmat, Dist. Hingoli. 3. Learned A.G.P. on behalf of State makes a statement that if the Revision Petition No. 295 of 2006 is not already decided, the Appellate Authority will decide it within two months from today. In view of the above statement, the learned counsel states that he does not press this petition and seeks leave to withdraw the same. The above statement of 3 A.G.P. is accepted and leave is granted to the petitioners to withdraw the petition. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Court Shirastedar . [ K.K.TATED ] JUDGE knp/WP4501.09 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13