^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH A1T BILASPUR SSngte Bench: Hon'ble Shri Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J. APPELLANT: APPLICANT RESPONDENTS NON- APPLICANTS Misc. Appeal (C.l No. 1303/2007 Siba Tarjin, aged about 15 years, D/o Sheikh Naseem, minor Through father and natural guardian Sheikh Naseem, R/o Chuchiyapara, Ganeshnagar, P.0. & Distt. Biiaspur (C.G.) Versus 1. Chandrakant Shrivas, aged about 30 years, S/o Girdhari Lal Shrivas 2. Harmoon Devi Shrivas W/o Girdhari Lal Shrivas, aged 30 years Both residents of village Kodla, P.8. Seepat, Tah. & Distt. Bjlaspur (C.G.) 3. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., through Branch Manager. Branch Office- Rajiv Plaza. Bus Stand, P.0. & Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Appeaj Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act.1988 Present: Shri B.R. Ghosh, counsel for the appellant. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 20th November, 2007) Heard on admission. 2. The appellant is aggrieved by an avinard dated 16-08-2CX)? passed by 1st Addjtional Motor Accidents Claims Trlbunal, Klaspur (hereinafter referred to as "the MACT) in Claims Case No.92^)07 whereby in a case of 10% permanent disability syffered by a 15 year^ old girl due to fracture of tibia and flbula bone of the right leg, compensation of Rs.70,000/- was awarded as under: ^ I- 3. Learned counsel for the appellant has assailed the impugned award in this appeal for enhancement of compensation on ttie sote ground that since the appellant/claimant had suffered 10% permanent disability resulting in shortening of the leg, therefore, her maFriage prospects were adversely effected and under this conventional head, no amount has been awarded. However, upon a careful pen^al ofthe impugned award, it is noticed that the claimant did not suffer shortening of the leg on account of injuiy suffered by her but suffered only mal-union of the tibia and fibula tone. No material was placed to substantiate that the marriage prospects of the appellant/claimant were adversely effected. 4. In this view of the matter, 1 am of the opjnion ttiat fn Itie fects and circumstances, compensation awarded by the MACT is just and reasonabte compensation and calls for no interference. 5. Accprdingly, this appeal is dismissed at the stage oyadmissiot"!. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge Kvr ~§LNo7 Description Am©untOnR€ipees) ^17 Towards Medical expenses 30,000^. "027 Towards pain and suffering 5,OOQA. ~03T Towards loss of amenities in life 10,000/- ~047 Towards loss of income during treatment of parents 5,000/- ^57 Expenses incurred towards special diet and conveyance §,000/- 06. Towards permanent disability i§,oo(y- Total ... 70,000/-