IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7035 of 2010 Dinesh Tiwari s/o Chandra Ketu Tiwari, r/o village – Ameya, P.O. – Mahuawan, P.S. Kateya, Gopalganj Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj 5. The District Panchayati Raj Officer,Gopalganj 6. The Block Development Officer, Kateya, Gopalganj 7. Smt. Husn Tara w/o not know, the Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Ameya, Kateya Block, Gopalganj 8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panhayat Raj, Ameya, Gopalganj ----------- 2 23/4/2010 In this public interest litigation the grievance in singularity is that though immense irregularities are committed by the Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Raj Ameya, Block - Kateya, District – Gopalganj and representations have been made to the District Magistrate, Gopalganj, no action is taken. Having heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State, it is directed that the District Magistrate shall delve into the representation made against the Mukhiya and if circumstances so warrant take appropriate action as advised in law in quite promptitude. Be it clarified, we have not expressed any opinion on the 2 merits of the case. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of without any order as to costs. Neyaz/ ( Dipak Misra, CJ.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)