C-78 ^TSEf ^l^lrt^, U>-al'<-l<l<o, l6t«l<M^t< *l 1*101 ^TT^ 3TT^?T tmcf) (licl^e|«Ei) ^200 3TT^5Tc(nR^ich ^TT3TT^5T^Htcp ^^TT^^rf^r3Tr^$T w.ff PBTITIONBR Veena 28 Distt. Versits pinha, D/o. Shri Raoi Sevalc, aged about Govt. Girls High School-Geedam, Ipaatewada (CG) ye^rs RESPONDBNTS 1. 2. 3. State Depart^ Vibhag] Departjiient Chhatdsgarh, fhrough Secretaiy of Panchayat Evain Graiaisi Vikas Dau Kalyaa Singh Bhawmi, Mantrajlaya, Raipur (CG) i|?r, Distt- Daatewada (CG) Executive Officer, Zila Paiichayat, Dante\4ada (CG) Mantra|laya CoUect<t The CMef WRIT PBTITION UN1&ER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THB CONSTtTUTION OF INDIA SB: HON. SHRI DHIRENDRA 17-11-2008 Shri Vhiay Pandey, Ssnt. Sinita Ghai, Paael Heard, Grievaiice of fhe petitio Shiksha Karmi Grade-I 'Chexiiistry'? vacancy was Annexure P-3. Out of the caiididates. The Chief Bastar, vide meiaoraadum. o infonned tlie petitioner fhat list aiid she was catled upon necessaxy testinioiiials for its cpl^fo^-1 HFTc^t ^'^St ^Rrt^i^ ^3Tf^lT3n^?T . (S) No.6380/2008 of MISHRA, J couijisel for fhe petitioner. |La\vyer for the State, ^tier is fhat for recniitnient of 6 posts of the OBC categoiy for subject a4vertised by the respondent No.3 vide 6 posts, 2 were reser^ed for leniale Officer, Distdct Paachayat, North Annexure P-5, dated 16th June 2008, narae has been iacluded ia the laerit |to report on 25th June 2008 along with venflcation. She appeared on the given utider abbve Exec^tive Uer ,..;^^?^^. /?^\ -H8-78 ^cET ^qiqio^, tP^-I^K?, f6|rfl<M^ wffi'"" ^ 's^:^ssr *IMOI a?:*TT^ 3TI^9T q^Ep ((jc|ij4<£S) ^t 200 3H^$TcpT^icb nsn^^Tich^ich ?^nwr^f^T3n^$T ^ recdived date, her testiiaonials were f4 thereafter, she has not appoiiitment, fhough as per the O.B.C. category, the nam^ The petitioner has Annexure P-6, dated 3.7. representation has also not Learued counsel for the| fdes a fresh representation ttiis writ petition, before the order, withm. a period of one| decided within a fdrther peri^ of fhe representation, In view of the above tliis petition is disposed of representation for redressal No.3 along wifh a copy o| representation beiag made, l^y tlxe respondeut No.3 ia wifhia a further periiod of representation. al(:eady b^en Ibr cpi<i[c5<nTi ^i*i<^T^'f^^ ^i-c;i'< ^3T^T3TT^$T kind ia oider after verification. However, any comBiunication regarding her BList of fhe selected feinale candidates ia offhe petitioner was at serial No.2. subniitted her representation of |2008 ia fhis regard, However, her decided tiU date. State subxnits that iii case tlie petitioner redressal of her grievaaces, raised m ^espondent No.3 along wifh copy of fhis |week^ fhe saine shatl be considered and |>d of three weeks fromL fhe date of receipt su^inission of learaed counsel for fhe State, w|ith Ubert)r to tlie petitioner to file a fresh |of her grievances before fhe respondent this order wifhia a week, On such fhe saine shatl be considered and decided laccordance with law on its own inerits weeks froni the date of receipt of the tbt-ee Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge f