[C—78 3^r ^ww^, ^w\<o, fs)0i'y^< ^l^ldl sb<41<sh "^ 200 3Trit?T Tnw (4<±iflfl<<i^) ^TI^T ^T f<^Jch '?T8TT 3TT^T $ti^i<=b ^mw^ft^^n^r W.P.No.4 PETITIONER RESPONDBNTS 2 The Soc Chl Chl 3 Uni Prir of Pan Shg DB: HON'BLE SHRI L.C. BHADC HON'BLB SHRI SUNIL KUK <=hi^f<rt<fli 4-ii*i<yiT '^.fs^ <RI<^K ^ 3^tRpRT 3TT^T fc361/2004 Instit|ute of Social Sciences, 8, Nelsoja Maadela Road, Vasaiit KunjJ New Delhi, 110 070, throi^gh : Shri K.K.Patnaik, aged |about 65 years, S/o Late Shii | Raghunafh. Pataaik Regiojjial Coordiriator, Eastera Regioja, lustitute of Social Scien|ces, A-75, BJB Nagar, Bhub|neshwar(0rissa). Vef^us Sta^e of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Goveminent of Cht^attisgarh Departaient of Paj3|chayat aad Social Welfare, DK^, Bhawaa, Maritoralaya, Rai^ur, Chhattisgarh Director, Paachayat aad [al Welfare Govemnient of tattisgarh Raipur, lattisgarh ^n of India, Through cipal Secretary, Govemjoient India, Department of chayat & Social Welfare, std Bhawan, New DeUii, 108s AR 8INHA, JJ. ^\ ^. 3?n^Tj^r (<»iicb WT WCT sb^llch 3^'^TTzn^T, ^Tfl^^Ko, (s|<?'>W^< GO l^JP • ^26 \ Nl^dl (bNlcb' W^ 200^4- 3ni(?r ^^3R (4<s<^<^r) ^RHW^f?^ 3in^r <2- ^ll^^q S^q' ^Uji^q, ^J Appearaiice: Shri R.S.Marhas, Co ShriVmayHarit, Dy. State/respondents No. 1 & Shri S.K.Beriwal, India. coilnsel through Shri K.K. Patnaik | Nelson Mandela Road, Vas| Shri Viaay Harit su^ aiiy resolution, whereby, fhis wnt petition fhrough \ on 16.1.2008, coimsel foj suppleraentary affidavit ai| ffled. Shri R.S.Marhas, re| petitioner-Institute, but so| fhe Institiite. ;. ct»Nf<n<ili ^i+Krff'^f Fs^ <F^^i< ^i" 3TRFT 3TT^T biasel for the petitioner. Advocate General for the 12. for respondent No.3/Union of RAL ORDER (128.01.2008) Followiag order of tih^: Conrt was passed by L.C.Bhadoo, J. Heard. This petition has beejn filed as a PubUc Interest Litigation by fhe Institute ofSoeial Sciences, 8 iat Kunj, New DeUu. )mits that fhe petitioner has not filed Uie petitioner-Institute decided to file 3hri K.K. Patnaik and for that purpose : the petitioner sought time to fUe a id tiU date no such affidavit has been :)resentmg fhe petitioner submits fhat even though he coininu|iicated about the said fact to the far, no resolution has been passed by ^^—:^ /•^&. 1'^' i! ^.»sy Tc^" ^|<<|<v->^, ^TO^^KS, fel01'M^< _...^..L.....^lLi NWdl *Nlch* WI, 200^ ^TT^T^T (qii<»» sbNJch ^ J^rv^. 3TT^?T TRW ( <ic<^^) ^Rnw^fin ^ETI^T In view of fhe above, I without fhere bemg aay filed fhis wnt petition aiid i| arise as to fhe inaiataiaabilB Shri Marhas furtherl disposed of with Uberty 1| resolution thereof, if aiiy The prayer is allowed.] The petition is dispos^ The security ainoui| refunded to hun as per inle^ Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge (ve are of the considered opmion fh.at r^solution, the petitioner-Institute has is on this ground, a questk^n would |ty ofthe petition. submits fhat fhis petition niay be IQ iile a petition after passiag the ex3|gency anses. |d ofwith fhe aforesaid Uberty. |.t deposrted by the petittoner be cbl^fd41T1 '^TR^if "^ 'fe^' ^^R ^3tRP:T3TI^T Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge ?TR^T ^N^T ^uil^, <l^^i^lic( —FS/59— 8/2007 —30,000.