: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8871 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.8871 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO.8871 OF 2004 Ramchandra Anant Pradhan ... Petitioner V/s. Shri Narendra Anant Mule ... Respondent Mr.B.G. Tangsali for Petitioner Mrs.I.Koparkar i/b N.P. Deshpande for Respondents CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: JULY 19, 2005 JULY 19, 2005 JULY 19, 2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . The petitioner seeks to challenge the impugned order on the ground that the original plaintiff having died, all his legal heirs should have been brought on record. The plaintiff’s heir, the respondent herein, has been substituted as the plaintiff and, therefore, I see no reason to interfere with the order of the trial Court There is no dispute that one co-owner can file suit on behalf of and for other co-owners and in this case one co-owner has been brought on record on behalf of the four co-owners. In such circumstances, there is no need for the others to be brought on record. Hence, Petition dismissed.