IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2009 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1931 RP.No. 1198 of 2009() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.10843/2009 Dated 02/04/2009 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- 1. SHIJIL.R. PROPRIETOR, MANJIPUZHA TRADING COMPANY MANJIPUZHA HOUSE, ARINALLOOR P.O. THEVALAKKARA, CHAVARA. 2. C.V.UMAPRASAD, MANJIPUZHA HOUSE, ARINALLOOR P.O. THEVALAKKARA, CHAVARA. BY ADV. SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, REPRESENTED BY THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, (CHIEF MANAGER) REGION IV, ZONAL OFFICE STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, ZONAL OFFICE, TRIVANDRUM. 3. THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, CHAVARA SOUTH BRANCH, KOLLAM. 4. SANTHOSH KUMAR, ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER (UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECURITIZATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT) KOLLAM. ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA FOR R1-3 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J ........................................... R.P.NO.1198 OF 2009 ............................................ DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2009 ORDER Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents, I do not find any ground warranting review of the impugned judgment. However, taking the submissions into consideration and treating this as essentially an application for enlargement of time, it is ordered that if the petitioner remits a further amount of Rs.3,00,000/- within a period of two weeks and the remaining amounts on or before 20.1.2010, the judgment sought to be reviewed will be treated as satisfied. R.P ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE lgk/18/12