1 CA-4228.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE  CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4228 OF 2010 Arvind Vamanrao Ghadole .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Shri Amol Deshpande for the Applicant. Ms P.P. Bhosale, APP, for the State. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: DECEMBER 14, 2010 P.C: This is husband's application for bail in an offence of conspiracy to murder his wife. Sachin Meshram and Uday Deshpande are alleged to have entered into a conspiracy with the applicant to eliminate the applicant's wife Urvashi with whom the applicant had a dispute in the Family Court. The police mainly rely on the fact that the applicant was in touch with Sachin Meshram and Uday Deshpande on mobile phone on a large number of occasions and, therefore, infer the applicant's complicity. The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant that this cannot be adequate to hold the applicant liable, as also his contention 2 CA-4228.10 that the victim had in fact received somebody else's call on her mobile phone before she was killed and that this call has not been traced by the police, would be matters which would be considered properly at the trial. At this stage, the applicant is not entitled to bail because of the material which has been collected against him. The application is, therefore, rejected. The learned trial Judge would expedite the hearing of the case. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.)