WPSS No. 165 of 2011 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for the State. Against the transfer order, the Court is of the opinion that the petitioner should approach the authority concerned by making an appropriate representation. In the present case, the court finds the petitioner has made representation to the authority concerned. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the authority concerned to decide the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order within two weeks from the date of the production of a certified copy of the order. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 01.03.2011 Shiv