IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7164 of 2008 GEETA KUMARI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 5/5/2008 Counsel for the petitioner seeks permissions to implead Block Development Officer, Tilantha, District- Rohtas at Sasaram as respondent no.9 to this writ application. Let him do so in course of the day. Heard the parties. Grievance of the petitioner in this writ application is that she should be appointed as Primary Teach in place of respondent nos. 7 and 8, namely, Rintu Kumari @ Rintu Devi and Shushila Kumari @ Shushila Devi, whose certificates of qualification for matriculation and Intermediate are not genuine. For such relief the petitioner has remedy under clause (18) of the Rules by approaching the concerned Block Development Officer. As such liberty is given to the petitioner to approach before the Block Development Officer, Tilantha within the district of Rohtas at Sasaram (Respondent no. 9) by filing a complaint/representation and in the event of receipt of such complaint/representation, the concerned Block Development Officer will issue notice to the aforementioned respondent nos. 7 and 8, namely, Rintu Kumari @ Rintu Devi and Shushila kumari @ Shushila Devi and after hearing the Mukhila as well as Halka Karamchari ( respondent nos. 5 and 6) the representation/Complaint of the 2 petitioner must be disposed of by passing a speaking order within a period of three months of receipt of the said representation/complaint. With the above observation this application is disposed of. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar.