IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6967 of 2010 SUNITA DEVI W/O NANHAK SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 30.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 304/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. By an order dated 3.3.2010 the informant was impleaded as opposite party no. 2 and he was noticed, but the office report is that the opposite party no. 2 refused to grant receipt with regard to the acceptance of the notice. It has been submitted that the petitioner is mother in law of the deceased and there is no specific overt act against her. In view of such, let the petitioner, who is in custody since 25.12.2009, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Sheohar at Sitamarhi, in connection with Shyampur Bhataha, P.S. case no. 77/2008, subject to the 2 conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse.+ Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J.)