IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4501 OF 2009 Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation ...Petitioner Vs. Shri Tukaram Kondiba Acharya ... Respondent --- Shri A.V. Chatuphale for Petitioner Shri K.S. Bapat for Respondent. Shri Avinash Fatangare for Respondent No.7 ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 18TH JUNE, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard. 2. Shri Bapat, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the present Petition. He submits that the Petitioner has an alternate remedy of filing the revision application under section 44 of the M.R.T.U. and P.U.L.P. Act before the Industrial Court. He submits that instead of filing the revision application, the Petitioner straight away approached this Court by filing Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. In view of this, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a revision application before the Industrial Court under section 44 of the M.R.T.U. and P.U.L. P. Act. 4. Petition, therefore, allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. V.M. KANADE J.