... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3997 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3997 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3997 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3996 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3996 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3996 OF 2005 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri A.S.Shitole, A.P.P for the State. Shri M.B.Gawade for the Respondent. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : DECEMBER 20, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 20, 2006. DATE : DECEMBER 20, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Office noting shows that conditional order dated 07th June, 2006 has become operative and the Application stands dismissed as against the Respondent Nos.1,2,4,5, 7 to 10. The learned Advocates appearing for the Respondent Nos.3 and 11 and Respondent No.12,13 and 14 have opposed this Application. The Respondent No.6 and 15 are duly served. 2. After having perused the averments in the Application, I find that sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. ... 2 ... Accordingly, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). It is clarified that Application for leave to prefer Appeal stands dismissed as against the Respondent Nos.1,2,4,5 and 7 to 10. Place the Application for leave on board on 08th February, 2007. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE