HK§E CQURT OF CHHATTESGARH AT giLASPUR SB. : HGN’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SATISH K. AGNIHGTR; ‘WRET PETITION N9. $32 (3f 2%0’3 Nageshwar Prasad Tripathi Jail Warder (dismissai) aged about 57' years S/‘o Late Shri .Gajanagd Tripathi r/o Village— Shivpurva, Via— Newari, PO. — Amarpataxl RS; — Amarpatam Dist:- Satana. {M.P.) VERSUS ,State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of prisons Mammlayg DKS Bhawan; Raipur Chhattisgarh. , inspsctor Ganaral of prisons, State Of Chhattisgarh, Raipur i State of MP. Bhopal. g The Superintandent, Cantrai Eail, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Th5 Superintendent, 1s‘ Class district jaiL Bastar Po. 8L Distt— Jagdalpur (CG) 5, District Jail, Sarguja, Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh. 6. State 0f Madhya Pradesh, Through Secretary, Department 0f prisons, Vallabh Bhawam Bhopaa, (M.P.) TPETITIONER RESPONDENTS Present: Shri HBAgrawal, Sr, Advocate with Shri J.K,Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govemment Advocate for the State/resporident no. 1 to 5. Shri Rajiv Shrivastava, Standing counsel for the respondent no. 6. . \r ORDER (Passed on 12m day of April, 2007) Léamgd cougssl appearing for Lm: patitimgr Submits ihat‘thg p$titio11er has fjied ax: a§p6a1 way back on 30.12.1982 before 'the Inspector General of Police, State of Madhya Fradesh. The said appeal remains undecided till date, Thereafter, the State of'Chhattisgarh was created W.e.f 01.1}.2000 pursuant to the eperatioa of provisiens of M.P.Re-ergaaisatien Act, 2000, Learned emmsel seeks direetion :0 the respendents 1 and 6 to consider and decide the appeal in accordance with law within a stipulated time. It is ordered accordingly. The respoadent no. 1 arid 6 are aceordiagly directed to decide i the pending appeal as early as possible preferably within'a period of two moaths, In the event, the appeal tiled before the Inspector General of Prisons, is not available, the petitioner is at liberty to file a :fresh appeal before the concerned authorities. The concerned authorities, respondent no, l and 6 shall consider the same without objection in regard to delay, if J any. The petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh appeal Within a period of ’15 days and the respondent authorities thereafter are ' directed to decide the same in accordance with law within a period of thiee months thereafter from the receipt of the appeal, if any, 5, In View of the above, this petition stands disposed of. No order WW” ¥W Sd/— _ f xSatish K. Agnihotri/ ‘ Judge ' ’i as to costs. § Amit A