1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1801 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8585 OF 2009 Annasaheb Shankarrao Kadam Applicant/ Intervener versus Narayan Vaijanath Badade and ors. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1800 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8583 OF 2009 Annasaheb Shankarrao Kadam Applicant/ Intervener versus Trimbak Laxman Badade and ors. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1803 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8559 OF 2009 Annasaheb s/o Shankarrao Kadam Applicant/ Intervener versus Vishnu Pandurang Badade Respondent/ WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1779 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8563 OF 2009 Annasaheb s/o Shankarrao Kadam Applicant/ Intervener versus Kaduram Srirang Badade and ors. Respondents 2 Shri C.V. Thombre, Advocate, for applicant. Ms. Manjushri Shendge Advocate, holding for Shri P.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1.Shri K.M. Suryawanshi, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 Coram : Shrihari P.Davare, J. Date : 15th September 2010. P. C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 02. It appears that the order dated 28.10.2009, passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Partur, which has been impugned in above writ petitions, has been passed by the concerned authorities on the basis of complaint made by the applicant herein and, therefore, it appears that the applicant is the original complainant and, hence, he is required to be permitted to intervene in the aforesaid writ petitions, and impleaded as Respondent No.5. 3 03. Hence, all four civil applications are allowed and it is directed that the applicant be impleaded as Respondent No. 5 in respective Writ Petition within the period of two weeks from today. 04. All civil applications stand disposed of, accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) pnd/ca1801.10