IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.320 of 2010 UMESH RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2/ 06.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. In the instant application, the petitioner is aggrieved with the order dated 22.02.2010, passed by 9th Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari, rejecting the prayer for release of the vehicle. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is owner of the vehicle and at the relevant time, he was not even traveling on it. In my view, the petitioner should move an application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., in stead of moving application under Section 226 of the Constitution of India. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to convert this application into one under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., as the matter relates to release of the vehicle. Once the conversion is done, the matter would be listed before the appropriate Bench. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)