( 1 ) cria2564.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2564 of 2011 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant Versus Parvatibai w/o. Suryakant Akuskar @ .. Respondent Parvati d/o. Sakharam Kasate, Age. 50 years, Occ. Labour, R/o. Followers Quarter, Ambajogai, Dist. Beed. Mr. B.J. Sonawane, A.P.P. for the applicant/State. Mr. S.W. Munde, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 01.12.2011 P.C. :- 1. Heard learned advocates on both sides. By this application the State wants that the order granting bail dated 02.04.2011 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai to present respondent Parvatibai, should be set aside. No doubt, in F.I.R. it is alleged that at the time of raid present respondent was in the premises where the raid was conducted. However, the prosecution ( 2 ) cria2564.11 has not been able to produce any material to show that the present respondent indulged in thriving on the money of prostitution. Learned Additional Sessions Judge has observed that there is no material to show that the respondent was compelling the ladies who were indulged in prostitution to prostitute and to earn livelihood. The learned A.P.P. for the State has relied upon the statement of Mangal Yadav, who became victim of the situation. According to said statement one lady by name Kashte Mavashi indulged in the overtact of driving the women to the prostitution and at the instance of said Kashte Mavashi, said Mangala was subjected to prostitute. Learned A.P.P. Mr. Sonawane on behalf of the State submitted that said lady by name Kashte Mavashi is nobody else but present respondent. There is nothing to support this submission. The police during the course of investigation have not confronted said girl by name Mangal with said lady who is termed as Kashte Mavashi, if this be the case then said Kashte Mavashi is nobody ( 3 ) cria2564.11 else but present respondent is not made out. 2. In view of this, no interference is required in the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai. The Criminal Application is rejected. [R.Y. GANOO, J.] snk/2011/DEC11/cria2564.11