IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH TA No.555 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 04.11.2011 Ram Kumar ...Applicant Versus Murlidhar ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. Arvind Rajotia, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. R.N. Lohan, Advocate for the respondent. JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. (Oral) 1. The prayer in the instant application is for transferring the Eviction Petition from the Court of learned Rent Controller, Jind, to any other Court within the District. 2. The present application, which is for the transfer of the Rent Petition, within District, has been filed without availing the opportunity to approach the learned District Judge-cum-Appellate Authority under the Act, in view of the provisions of Section 24 CPC. 3. Without commenting upon the merits of the present application, I feel that the appropriate remedy would have been to approach the concerned District Judge-cum-Appellate Authority under the East Punjab Rent Restriction Act (as applicable to Haryana). 4. In view of the above, the instant application is dismissed. However, the applicant may file the application before the competent authority, if so advised. 04.11.2011 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) atulsethi JUDGE Note : Whether to be referred to Reporter? Yes/No.