Crl.M.No.M-29419 of 2011(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-29419 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: September 30, 2011 Vishnu and another .....Petitioners v. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.52430 of 2011 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-29419 of 2011 The present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.20, dated 11.3.2009, registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 302 IPC, at Police Station Bound Kalan, District Bhiwani. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the impugned order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (I), Bhiwani, vide which application filed on behalf of the present petitioners for regular bail was dismissed. This is third application before this Court for regular bail filed on behalf of the petitioners-accused. Earlier application was got dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 6.7.2010 passed in Crl.M.No.M-7776 of 2010. The second application was also got dismissed as withdrawn vide Crl.M.No.M-29419 of 2011(O&M) -2- order dated 9.2.2011, passed in Crl.M.No.M-29210 of 2010. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that they have been continuing in custody since March 2009 and that trial has not been concluded so far despite the fact that this Court vide order dated 9.2.2011 had directed the trial Court to conclude the trial within four months from the next date of hearing. It is further submitted that now the case is fixed for 8.10.2011. It is further contended that accused have already led their defence evidence and that no other evidence in defence is to be led and, however, arguments in the case are not being heard by learned trial Court. Perusal of the file shows that on the request of learned trial Court, time for concluding the trial was extended upto 31.8.2011. It seems that the trial has not been concluded so far. Hence, the present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and efforts be made to conclude the same within one month from the next date of hearing. Registry is directed to send copy of this order to learned trial Court by fax for strict compliance. 30.9.2011 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge