1 cri-app.978-10 mgn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.978 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtara ..Appellant Vs. Imran Sayyad Yunus Sayyad & ors. ..Respondents Mrs. A.S. Pai, APP for State-Appellant. CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & U.D.SALVI, JJ. DATED: 13th January, 2011 P.C. We have heard Mrs. Pai, the learned A.P.P. We have also gone through the oral depositions of the victim. The victim was a major and was working in a Beauty Parlour. As per her own case, she had developed friendship with accused No.1, who has been convicted and sentenced for all the offences under Sections 376, 366, 385, 342, 452 and 506 of I.P.C. The State has filed this appeal for enhancement of sentence. 2. We have given our anxious considerations to the reasoning set out by 2 cri-app.978-10 the trial Court in awarding the sentence and also the arguments advanced by Mrs. Pai and we are satisfied that in the peculiar facts of this case the sentence awarded by the trial Court under Section 376 of I.P.C., does not call for reconsideration at our hands. We do not agree that for any of the offences, the trial Court has awarded inadequate sentence. 3. Hence the appeal is dismissed. (U.D.SALVI, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)