IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH JANUARY 2009 / 24TH POUSHA 1930 RP.No. 1015 of 2008(J) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.36430/2005 Dated 12/06/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:- ---------------------------------------------------- P.PRAKASH KUMARAN, MATHAS, NARAYANA NAGAR, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DIST. BY ADV. SRI.C.VALSALAN SRI.K.RAKESH ROSHAN SMT.THUSHARA.V RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE ASST. LABOUR OFFICER GRADE-1, ASSESSING OFFICER AS PER BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE CESS ACT. 2. THE SECRETARY, BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SECRETARY, VADAKARA MUNICIPALITY, VADAKARA. G.P. SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== R.P.No.1015/2008 in W.P(C).No.36430/2005 ================== Dated this the 14th day of January, 2009 O R D E R The petitioner in this review petition seeks review of my judgment on the basis of Annexures III to V documents now produced to show that the construction of the building was prior to the commencement of the Act, viz., 3.11.1995. However, I find from Annexure III that the building in question was assessed to property tax by the local authority from 1.10.1996, almost a year from the date of commencement of the Act. That being so, Annexures IV and V petitions filed by the petitioner before the Municipality cannot be relied upon for deciding the date of completion of the construction of the building in question. In the above circumstances, I do not find any merit in the review petition and accordingly, the same is dismissed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2