IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14447 of 2011 1. Shailendra Kumar S/O Nathuni Prasad R/O Ram Bigha, P.S.- Belaganj, Distt.- Gaya 2. Ramesh Kumar S/O Sri Kameshwar Singh R/O Fatehpur, Block- Belaganj, P.S.- Belaganj, Distt.- Gaya Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Dy. Development Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, Gaya 3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Belaganj, Distt.- Gaya 4. The Marketing Officer, Belaganj, Distt.- Gaya 2 12.9.2011 The petitioners, who are P.D.S. dealers under Belaganj Block in the district of Gaya seek quashing of the order dated 9.7.2011 passed by the Block Development Officer, Belganj, Gaya directing the petitioner nos.1 and 2 to refund of value of undistributed rice of 26.80 quintals and 306.28 quintals respectively at APL rate of Rs.13.70 per Kgs. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would also govern the instant writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that petitioner nos.1 and 2 would either deposit 2 30% and 15% respectively of the value of undistributed rice at Rs.10 per Kg. or the rice itself, if already not deposited within two months. This order would not come in the way of petitioners, if they want to deposit the value of undistributed rice or rice itself in excess of 30% and 15% respectively. KHAN (S. P. Singh, J.)