c- ^. v.° IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUmS-aWBffiASPUR rC.G.1 WRIT PETITION (227) N0. •}1/ioti /2011 PETITIONER Revisionst RESPONDENTS Respondents ^c^^^- ^^.^^'^^'^^•••••" ^AeAbl^^^-^ Smt. Ambika Bai Kashayp W/o Sakha Ram Kashyap, aged- about 29 years, R/- village- Chaurabhatha, Tahsil- Navagarh, Distt.- Janjgir Champa [C.G.] VERSUS 1. Collector, Janjgir Champa, Distt.- Janjgir Champa [C.G.] 2. Sub Divisional OfRcer, Janjgir Distt.- Janjgu- Champa [C.G.] 3. Smt. Uma Bai Aged-about 45 years W/o Jawahar Lal Kashyap, village- Chaurabhatha, Post-Amora, Tahsil-Navagarh, Distt.-Janjgir Champa [C.G.] 4.Jagdish Prasad Kashyap, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat- Chaurabhatha, post-Amora, Tahsil- Navagarh, Distt.- Janjgir Chainpa [C.G.] WMT PETITION UND_ER AKTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT. ORDER OR DIRECTIONS The above named petitionera niost humbly and respectfully begs to subnait as under: l.PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER- As mentioned above. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS- As mentioned above. 3. PARTICULARS OF THE ORDERS Order dated 19.07.2011 passed by Collector, Janjgir Champa in revision case no. 06 year 2010-11 Chaurabhatha, tahsil-navagarh (Ambika Bai /Umabai and another). (^ il'll ^>. ^ HJGH COIJRT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BITASPUR WRIT PETmON (227^ No. 4404 of2011 PETmONEB- : Smt. Ambika Ba.i KashvaD. VRRSIjS BJi.SPONDENTS : Collector. Jaaigir-Chamna &, Crthers. -i.17-3 IT Ti'CTTT'I^XT T T'^.TT^'E'D1 Al?rTTr'<T T? •'?'"?'7 r^T? '-p-Li^,1 F'-OXTffTm TT'?^Xr ^'^'K' Vv' K! ! f^ s. i i i\^i\ iji"\ Ij.f^K /AK i 1^1 ^F; A.A. f \f€l '\ nr^ ^•^^i'SSC^ x I i l^a i^-^IN t -?F TKTT^T A lj-'s!;l^lr-^ SB: Hoii'bie Sliri Satish K. Asnilhotri, .1. Present: Shri Sameer Singh- Advocate tor the petitioner. Sliri P.K.Bhaduri. Pa'ad Lawyer .fbr ths Slaie/rsispoiident N0. 1 aad 2. SUri P.K.Patel. Advocate fortlie resooadent No. 3 and 4. O R 11 K R (Passed OB 18 day ofNovember, 2Q11) 1. Bv this Detition. Ihe oetitioaer seeks iiuashiue of the order dated 19.07.2011 ("Annexiire p/4^i oassed bv the Collecior. Janieir- C-haaioa wnerebv. the Ax?DeaI Case No. 06 Ye.ar 2010-11. ha.s been dismissed on the eround of deiav. 2, Havinp r§@ardto the facts oftlie c^se< siBce the imDusned order na.ssed bv 'the Collector was aot on merit but on the eround ol deiav. the imouaied order dafed 19.07.2011 is (iuashed aad the CoSiector is direct.ed to consider the appeal a.fresh, a.fter pennittiag the oetitioner to file an aoolication for cocdoaatioii ofdelav. 3. It is made eiear tiiat the a??Dlicatioti for eoiidc?iiation of delav mav be considered on its own merits iiidependeatiy^ without being iiifluenced bv anv observation. made bv tliis Coiirt. Aeeordiii£iv\the wril. Detitiosi is disposed of. No ord^r aMo costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge