^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. (U/A 2271 No. 5884/2011 PETITIONBNR APPELLANT RBSPONDENT8 VBRSUS 1] 2] 3] 4] Rameshwar, S/o Barsati, aged about 50 yeara, R/o nUage Khairbar, Tah.sU Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). Gurupal Shanna, S/o Ramnarayan. Sharma, aged about 46 years, R/o viil^e Khairbar, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja(C.G.). Satyaaarayan. Agrawal, S/o Ramswaroop Agrawal, R/o Mahamaya Road, TahsU Ainbikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). Coinmissioner, Surguja Divisioa, Aoibikapur, District Sui^uja (C.G.). Sub-Divisional Of&cer (Revenue), Ambikapur, Surguja, District Suiguja (C.G.$. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA, (SB :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Bhupendra Singh, Advocate forthe respondents No. 1 85 2. Shri Akhil Agrawal, P.L. for the State/respondents No. 3 & 4. ORDBR 1. 2. (Passedon 30/09/2011} By this petition under Ardcle 227 of fhe Constitution of India petitioner has chaUenged fhe legalily aad propriely of the order dated 5/9/2011 passed by Commissioner, Surguja Division, Ambikapur Distnct Sui^uja (C.G.) in Ra. A. Case No. 82/A-23/ 10- 11. At ttie out set leamed counsel for both the parties subiiiits fhat order passed by Sub Divisional Officer was appealable before fhe CoUector uuder Section 44(1) of fhe C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959, but zuider erroneous beUeve present petitioner had filed appeal before the Commissioner, Surguja. ,:iSlssaSS».. ' ^"A ""%,\ .^ v n ;°Es-.:r^~3». V -^. 3. Adinittedly, Coininissioner, Ainbikapur has coinmitted jurisdictional error. Consequently, petitioa is aUowed. Order dated 5/9/2011 is hereby quashed. Parties are at Uberty to avaU remedy of appeal avaUable under tlie law ui accordaace witfa law. No order as to costs. Sd/-- -P. Sharma Judge :! 1 /7-