IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4618 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.4618 OF 2007 OF MOTION NO.4618 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.133 OF 1985 NO.133 OF 1985 NO.133 OF 1985 The Municipal Corporation of ... Plaintiffs Greater Mumbai Vs. Teksons Limited ... Defendants Mr. M.V. Shetty for Plaintiffs. None for Defendants. CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR : S.J. VAZIFDAR : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE DATE DATE : 15TH JULY, 2008 : 15TH JULY, 2008 : 15TH JULY, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- 1. It is not necessary for the Plaintiffs to take out this Notice of Motion. It is always open to the parties to lead secondary evidence before the Court recording the evidence. The question as to whether the evidence is admissible is to be decided by the Court recording the evidence. 2. Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed of.