IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.532 of 2010 UMESH YADAV son of Sri Chandrika Yadav Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 18.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under section 364-A of the Indian Penal Code. By order dated 26.8.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 1817 of 2009, the petitioner had been granted bail also on condition that the petitioner will give affidavit that he is not accused in any other case. But, it appears that since the petitioner is accused in one other case of 2001, in which case he is on bail, the petitioner could not fulfill the said condition. On going through the pleadings, I am satisfied that the petitioner despite having one criminal antecedent deserves to be enlarged on bail on the other conditions that have been incorporated in the order dated 26.8.2009 passed in Cr. Misc. No.1817 of 2009. The application stands allowed. Let this order be communicated to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Lauriya P.S. case no.123 of 2000 through Fax at the cost of the petitioner. JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)