THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA CONTEMPT CASE No.1750 of 2011 Dated:30.12.2011 Between: B.Sashikala .. Petitioner And Mr.Pankaj Dwivedi and others .. Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA CONTEMPT CASE No.1750 of 2011 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) The petitioner sued the Government of Andhra Pradesh for declaration of title and possession of land admeasuring 1082 square yards allegedly covered by Municipal No.8-2-602/2/A, situated at Road No.10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. In the said suit they also filed I.A.No.3085 of 2008 for ad interim injunction restraining the Government and its agents from alienating or changing the nature of the land or allotting or transferring the land in any manner. The same having been dismissed, they filed C.M.A.No.560 of 2009. By an order dated 20.01.2010, this Bench dismissed the said C.M.A. This Bench observed therein that in view of the statement made by the learned Government Pleader that there was no such proposal to develop the land or allot to any third parties, the Government was advised to take steps to protect the lands. In the affidavit accompanying the present Contempt Case, the power of attorney holder of the sole plaintiff alleges that the respondents/defendants have allotted the land to the Andhra Pradesh State Agro Industries Development Corporation vide letter dated 09.08.2011 and a ground breaking ceremony was also performed by the Hon’ble the Deputy Chief Minister and the concerned Hon’ble Minister. Therefore, the petitioner alleges that the same is in violation of the observations made by this Court in the order in C.M.A.No.560 of 2009. We have heard Sri S.Balchand, counsel for the petitioner. We are not able to persuade with the submissions made across the bar except making an observation that the Government should protect the land and recording the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner, no order was passed. But it was alleged that during the trial, the respondents are trying to allot the land/allotted the land to the Andhra Pradesh State Agro Industries Development Corporation. It is a new cause of action. It is always open to the petitioner to move appropriate application or application under Section 94 and relevant order of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 to protect and maintain status quo with regard to the plaint schedule property. Except making the observation, we do not find any reason to admit the Contempt Case. The Contempt Case, with the above observations, is dismissed. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) _____________________ (B.N.RAO NALLA, J) 30.12.2011 Note:- Dispatch order copy within three days (B/o) KH