‘ 'c‘f‘l’gd ' / IN THE HIGH LOURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition ‘No./o?g$7 /2006 Ram Kumar Singh aged 32 years son of Shri Ram Kishun Singh, resident of village Ghutiya, Tahsil Mungeli, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Petitioner ...... V i§§ Q‘ $0.“ ‘ V\\C‘) W ‘ 'Q Qfa§espr5ndents : /1. VERSUS ifs State of Chhattisgarh through Principal Secre- tary, Panchayat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag, D.K.Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat ' Pathariya, Distt. Biiaspur (C.G.) / 3. Gram Panchayat Ghutiya through Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Ghutiya, Tahsii Mungeii, Distt. Biiaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 2261227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE’OF WRIT OF MANDAMU ' CERTIORARI UO I WARRANTO, PROHIBITION ANQIOR ANY OTHER WRITIORDEN DIRECTION ON THE SAME NATURE IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. / 0- / m wimw W: WW: ww W #3 3» .. MM um Mm wwm m W w W W in accordance with Iaw. WWW, «mm—Fmw—z/zm 1—1,so,ooo. I a? wmw....’é. m 200 V »mm(1af3a§u) mwfaw WWW mama-Em WM WW $sif€wané¥r SB Hgtxfa ¢u.§?7.20;1 Shrl Varun Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Chandresh §5hrivastava, P.L. for the State/respondent Mo. 1 . Shri Pawan Shriva$tava, counsei for respancient No. 2. ChaNenge in the present writ petition is to the resolution dated 03.102 00 (Annexure P-1) passed by Gram Panchayat, Ghutiy (respondent No.3). Learned counsel fo the petitioner fairiy submits that the petitioner has a altemative remedy of filing an appeal before the S. .0; and therefore he may be permitted to withdraw t is petition with liberty to file an appeal before the S [3.0. He, however, submits that the S.D.0. may be irected to consider the point of limitation liberally a cl to. decide the appeal on merits. Learned counsel f r the respondents have no l objection if the petitione Withdraws this petition and files an appeal before th S.D.O. They submits that the limitation point shall be considered by the S.D.O; w'P’ § ‘ lZ/Gy/M’ mzoo emm (13W) W m WWW 3741mm WWW“ mm Wm avaimm‘ Permission granted. Accordingly the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the afore‘ filing any such appeal along with appliCation for co donation of delay by the petitioner, the same 'concerned authority in aci It is made clear tha any opinion on the merits concerned would be at strictly in accordance witl facts. Sdl— Pritinker Diwaker Judge In the eventuality aid liberty. ould be decided by the :ordance with law. t this court has not expressed . of the case and the authority liberty to decide the appeal i law after due scrutiny of the mamdatum,m—FS/14o—2/2o11—1,so,ooo.