$-37 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 776/2010 with CrI. IVI.A. 18593-94/2010 RENU KATARIA Petitioner Through i\/Ir. H.N. Takkar, IVlr. Deepak Anand, Advs. Versus TARUN KUiVIAR RAUNTA Respondent Through CORAM: JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA ORDER % 16.12.2010 This petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing an order of interim maintenanceunderSection 125 Or. P.O. The petitionerand her child are living separate from the respondent/husband. The salary of petitioner is ? 24,000/- per month, she being a teacher. The salary of husband was around? 31,000/-per month gross and net salary after deductions was ? 27,847/-. The learned trial court considered that husband and wife were able to maintainthemselves and the responsibilityof maintenance of child was on both of them. He, therefore, fixed interim maintenance of ^ 3,000/- per month to be paid by the husband to the wife for the maintenance of the child. Petitioner's counsel states that medical expenses and expenses for aaya etc. have not been considered by the Trial Court. Since the order passed by the Trial Court is of the nature of interim order, and all other expenses are to be proved before the Trial Court during evidence, the Trial Court shall pass fin^^rderon the basis of evidenceadduced by the parties concerningall Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified aspects. 1consider it is not proper to interfere with the order of interim maintenance at this stage. The petition is disposed of with the directions that when final order is passed, the Trial Court shall consider entire evidence which is brought on record. DECEMBER 16, 2010 acm SHIV NARAYi5lTMjHINGRA,J