THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.762 of 2009 Dated 11th April, 2011 Between: Sri Ch.Leela Prasad and others …Petitioners And The Acharya Nagarjuna University, rep.by its Vice Chancellor, Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur District and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri K.Gani Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri P.Harinath Gupta Counsel for respondent No.2: Sri Aka Venkataramana Counsel for respondent Nos.3 to 5: GP for School Education The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “…to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondent No.1 in not considering the requisition of the petitioners through 2nd respondent college, dated 12.01.2009 for rectification of the lapses in issuing results of the petitioners and for issuance of fresh results in favour of the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary, against the fundamental rights guaranteed under the constitution and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct Respondent No.1 to issue fresh results in favour of the petitioners.” At the hearing, Sri K.Gani Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.Nos.957 and 958 of 2009 filed by the petitioners for interim relief are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 11th April, 2011 VGB