HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Coatemot Petitioa No. 8S of 2008 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Bendict Tigga, s/o late Paulus Tigga, aged about 55 years, workhig as Conipaay Commandaiit, Home Guard, Baikunthpur, R/o Hoine Guard Canxp/ Baikunfhpur, Distt, Koriya(C.G.) Versus S.K. Aswal, Secretary, Departnieut of Honie Affairs, D.K,S, Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G) SJ<, Paswaa, Director general of Police (Honie Gziard), Police Headquarter, Raipur(C,G) CON^BMPTPBTITIONUN^BRSBCTIO^iaOF^^T^ CONTEMPT OP COURTS ACT RBAD WITH ARTICLB 213 QF THB CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearaaaee : Shri V.K. Paadey, Counsel for tiie petitioner, QRALQRDBR 105.03.2008) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA^J. Heard on adniissioii. The petitiouer has filed fhis conterapt petition on the ground that fhe order dated 04.07.2007 passed in W.P.No. 1865/2004 has not been conipUed by respondents no.l aad 2 even after lapse of inore tliaa 7 inontlis froni fhe date of passiag of tlie said order. The order dated 04.7.2007 is perused. Para 13 offlie said order reads as iinder: "In view of tlie foregoiag, thie petitiou is aUowed. The respondents no.l to 6/authorities are directed to hold DPC as on 26,5/2004 considermg tlie cases of tiie petitioner and other respondents for promotion, in. accordaiice wifli law." Contemot. Petn.. No.BS/2008 Froni perusal of fhe said order especially para 13, it appears tliat tliis Court has only directed the respondents no. 1 to 6/autliorities to hold DPC as on 26.5.2004 consideiliig fhe cases of tlie petitioner aad otiier respondents, in. accordance witli law, fhat is to say fh.at no time Umit was prescribed by tliis Court to hold DPC aiid it was a simple direction to fhe conceined aufhorities to hold it m accordaiice wifh law. If in such a situation, DPC has not been convened tiU date, it caiinot be said tiiat flie coucenied aufhorities have coininitted contenipt of tlie order dated 04.7.2007 passed by this Coiirt. In tlie opuiion of fliis Coiirt though fhe respondents are obliged to comply the order of this Court. dated 04.07.2007, but atleast at tiliis stage, no case for proceediag under conteinpt is niade out. Witli the above obser^ations, fliis petition staiids disposed of at tlie inotion stage, itself. However, tlie petitioner shall be obUged to bring tliis order to the notice of fhe concemed autliorities to awai'e them about tiie obseivations made by fliis Court dunng fhe course ofhearmg. Sd/- Sunii Kumar SInha Judge