WP(C) 4937/2003 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. KATAKEY Heard Mr. P.J. Saikia, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mrs . Phukan, learned State counsel appearing for the respondents. The petitioner by the present petition has challenged the action on the part of the respondents in demanding transit pass and transit challans for trans portation of stones and crushed stones. It has been submitted by the learned cou nsel for the parties that the matter in issue in the present petition has alread y been answered in Rengfrah Stone Crusher (M/S) Vs. State of Assam & ors. report ed in 2008(3) GLT 650, wherein it has been held that the action on the part of t he authority in demanding transit pass and transit challans in respect of the st one processed/to be processed in the crushing units is illegal and hence such ac tion was quashed. The learned counsel for the parties, therefore, submits that t he present petition may accordingly be disposed of. Having regard to the contention raised by the petitioner in the present petition and the decision of this Court in Rengfrah Stone Crusher (M/S) (supra), I am of the view that the issue involved in the present petition has been answe red in the same case. Hence the decision in Rengfrah Stone Crusher (M/S) (supra) shall govern in the present writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.