IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19949 of 2009 1. LUKHIA DEVI, W/o Sri Pragash Yadav 2. Pinku Yadav,son of Shri Pragash Yadav Both are resident of village-Kokari, P.S.-Hasanpur,District-Samastipur. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02/ 14-07-2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that it was a love affair only, if not and was a kidnapping, the whole responsibility rests upon co-accused Sentu Yadav as it was his lust for which the victim was kidnapped. Petitioners may have any hand in kidnapping is not believable, though victim in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. names these petitioners also but after coming in influence of her family members. She was recovered with co-accused Sentu Yadav only. So, petitioners’, who are parents of Sentu Yadav, arrest can never be justified. I agree with the same. Accordingly, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in Hasanpur P.S.Case No.09 of 2009, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera (Samastipur), subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )