IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civl Writ Petition No.17080 of 2011 Date of Decision : September 13, 2011. Sharandeep Kaur and another .....Petitioners versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Paramjit Singh Jammu, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioners applied for the posts of Punjabi Mistresses in the Education Department, Punjab and it appears that they could not appear for counseling for want of Internet Services, despite being higher in merit. They represented the authorities for sympathetic consideration of their claim and to give them another opportunity to appear for counseling/scrutiny of the documents, but no decision appears to have been taken on their representation dated 12.7.2011 (Annexure P-4). In these circumstances and without expressing any views on the merits of the petitioners' claim, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the CWP No.17080 of 2011 [2] petitioners as contained in their representation dated 12.7.2011 (Annexure P-4) sympathetically and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order, within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. September 13, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE