IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11377 of 2010 YOGENDRA SINGH SON OF MATUK SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE –MANJHAULI, P.S. BAKHTIARPUR, DISTRICT PATNA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 30-04-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner has prayed for anticipatory bail in a case under sections 341, 323, 324, 504, 379/34 of the IPC and 27 of Arms Act. It has been submitted that admittedly there is land dispute between the parties and allegation of firing which allegedly caused a simple pellet injury to the informant is confined against son of this petitioner and assault by the petitioner is said to be by fists and slaps. It has been submitted that on account of land dispute allegations have been exaggerated and false allegation has been labelled that petitioner removed the Kurta containing money and also Nehali. Allegation against the petitioner may not be serious but considering the nature, facts and circumstances, it is not deemed proper to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer is rejected. If the petitioner surrenders within six weeks in the court below and prays for regular bail, in that case his prayer should be considered expeditiously without being prejudiced by this order. BKS/- (Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)