IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL SECOND APPEAL SECOND APPEAL NO.510 OF 2003 NO.510 OF 2003 NO.510 OF 2003 Mrs.Suvarna Anand Mulay & Others ..Appellants versus Prabhakar Narsinha Deolekar & Others ..Respondents Mr.R.D.Soni for the Appellant Mr.P.K.Dhakephalkar for the Respondent Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 10th March, 2006 Dated : 10th March, 2006 Dated : 10th March, 2006 P.C. 1. Heard both the learned Advocates. 2. The suit was for recovery of amount of Rs.35,960/- from the defendants. The trial court decreed the suit. However the First Appellate Court has modified the decree to some extent and instead of payment of Rs.35,960/- the defendant Nos.2 and 3 were directed to pay Rs.25,479/- and interest at 18% on 18,245/- from the date of the suit till realisation of the amount. The order passed by the 6th Additional District Judge, Pune is legal and correct. Moreover, there is no substantial question of law involved in this matter. In fact, the learned Advocate for the appellant also submtited that amount is also paid accordingly. Hence the second appeal is dismissed in limine. (S.R.Sathe, J.)