IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14776 of 2009 BANDANA SINHA @ BANDANA SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 3 29.4.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. In view of the subsequent grant of anticipatory bail to two others, after the rejection of the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner moulding the prayer submits that the regular bail of the petitioner may be directed to be considered keeping in mind that she was a lady and other co- accused have subsequently been granted anticipatory bail. Learned Counsel for the State does not oppose this limited prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. The renewed application for anticipatory bail is disposed with the observation that any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner in context of Patna Vigilance P.S. case No. 39 of 2008 shall be considered by the Court below in the manner submitted on behalf of the petitioner, not opposed by the learned Public Prosecutor, without being prejudiced by the present order. 2 Let this order be communicated to the Court below by Fax at the cost of the petitioner. A.Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)