IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 1ST JANUARY 2008 / 11TH POUSHA 1929 W.P(C).No. 38063 of 2007 (F) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- THUMBUKKAL CHANDRAN, S/O. APPUTTY, AGED 71 YEARS, CHAKKAT THAZHAM, NELLIKKODE P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.N.RAMESAN NAMBISAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. SURESH DAVID. 2. SUJATHA CHRISTINA. 3. SAJITH JACOB. 4. SABITHA MARIA. (ALL ARE THE CHILDREN OF LATE P.HANCY ROBERT, NELLIKKODE AMSOM, DESOM P.O., CHEVARAMBALAM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT). 5. NIKHITHA JOSE (MINOR), REP. BY HER FATHER & NATURAL GUARDIAN,JOSE JOSEPH, S/O. THOMMAN,KOCHUPURAKKAL HOUSE,P.O.CHEVARAMBALAM KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. 6. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY & COMMISSIONER, BOARD OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.I.V. PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No. 38063 OF 2007 F = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 1st January, 2008 J U D G M E N T The challenge in this writ petition is against Ext. P9, a corrected purchase certificate issued on 2.8.2006. Petitioner submits that Ext. P9 is vitiated by fraud and violation of the principles of natural justice. It is also stated that following Ext. P9, respondents 1 to 4 have assigned 4 cents of land to respondent No. 5. 2. The basic grievance therefore is against Ext. P9. If the petitioner is aggrieved by Ext. P9 the Kerala Land Reforms Act itself provides for an appellate remedy. I see no justification for invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court. Reserving the remedy available to the petitioner under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, this writ petition is dismissed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE jan/-