IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHA’J“I‘ISGARH ‘ BILA$PUR@ Writ Petin'on No. 2739 of2004 Petitioner Bhaskar Datta ’l‘iwari, S/o Van Swaroop ’I‘iwaxi, Aged about 36 years, R/o Raikera, Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (QGJ Versus . Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Thmtigh: Secmtaxy, 'I‘n‘bal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Depaxtne'nt, Ravishankar University Campus, Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Jéshpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) WRIT PE’I‘I’I‘ON UNDER ARTICLE 226i 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 3. (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotn‘ J.) Shn Mano; Pax'anJpe, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms Sum'ta Jain, Panel Lawyer for the respondents. ORDER ‘ (Passed on this‘znd Day of September, 2008) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that in the light‘of the decision of this Court in the matter of A. Lall (Smt.) v. State of Chhattisgarh 85 othels { 2007(1) BLJ 265}, this peh'u'on has become innuctuous. ' 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State has no ‘ objection. 3. In View ofthe above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as having become inhnctuous. Consequently, M(W)P No. 24 16/ 2004_ stands dismissed. w x Sd/- Satish K.‘ Agnihotri Judge Thnkut