1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 794 OF 2009 AND ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 795 OF 2009 Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited ...Petitioner. Vs. Kingfisher Airlines Limited ...Respondent. Mr. Janak Dwarkadhas, Sr. Counsel with Mr. Anuit Lohiya with Mr. Raj Panchamatia i/by M/s. Udwadia & Udeshi for the Petitioner. Mr. N.S. Seervai, Sr. Counsel along with Mr. Dr. Berendra Saraf i/by M/s. Bachubhai Munim & Co. for the Respondent. CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 4th November, 2009. P.C.- 1 The Petitioner has invoked Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Arbitration Act) for appropriate measure/ protection against the Respondent, as there exist arbitration clause and the dispute arising out of the same. 2 The parties have now, settled the matter and accordingly arrived at a consent terms dated 4th November, 2009 signed by the authorized signatories and the respective advocates. There is no dispute/objection about the authorization and the identification of the persons. The same is 2 taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The statement is made that the consent terms are well within the framework of law and the record. 3 Both the Petitions are disposed of, in view of the consent terms, as agreed. 4 Certified copy is expedited. (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)