IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 386 of 2004 Between: 1 Medarametla Anjaiah, S/o. Seetaiah R/o. Medarametla Village, Korisepadu Mandal, Prakasam District. 2 Vadlamudi Subba Rao, S/o. Venkata Subbaih R/o. Medarametla Village, Korisepadu Mandal, Prakasam District. 3 Manne Dhanalakshmi, W/o. Hanumantha Rao R/o. Medarametla Village, Korisepadu Mandal, Prakasam District. 4 Kota Sumathi, W/o. Srinivasa Rao, R/o. Medarametla Village, Korisepadu Mandal, Prakasam District. 5 Medarametla Venkata Rangam, S/o. Raghavaiah R/o. Medarametla Village, Korisepadu Mandal, Prakasam District. 6 Ravavarapu Varalakshmi, W/o. Ramaiah, R/o. Medarametla Village, Korisepadu Mandal, Prakasam District. 7 Mandapalli Vijayalakshmi, W/o. Kondana Ramaiah R/o. Medarametla Village, Korisepadu Mandal, Prakasam District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, Prakasam District, Ongole. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ongole, Prakasam District. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukuru, Prakasam District. 4 The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Govt. of A.P. Hyd. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing notification under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, vide Proceedings in R.C.No. G2/5470/2002 dated 3-8-2003 published in Eenadu Paper on 29-8-2003 and also notification under form 5(A) of Land Acquisition Act, vide proceedings Rc.No. G2/5470/2002, dated 17-8-2003 issued by the 1st respondent for acquisition of lands in Sy.No. 546, 547/1A, 552 of Medarametla Village, Koresepadu Mandal, Prakasam District, contrary to the guidelines issued by the Government of A.P., the impugned notification and also contrary to the law laid down by the Apex Court reported in AIR 1979 SC 1713 is illegal and void and opposed to Article 14,19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently to set-aside the impugned notifications in question, Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.MUMMANENI.SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Ms. Shilaja, learned advocate representing Sri Mummaneni Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the writ petition. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. No costs. GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 07-03-2008 Pvks/*