,5 '^riFt^i^B 3. 4. Amit Transport Company through its Proprietor Amit Sahu S/o Late Shri iVlunna Sahu, aaed about. 29 years R/o Nayapara, Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) v Aarasen through its Proprietor Agrawal, S/'o Late Shri Agrawal, Aged about 3 resident of Neora, r^;—*^S^AS'»!p<-"'y /<^ /^ \ Ui&ii i4Ji-r\i3Ip.UI \\^.\3.j Ji years, Tilda. Janam Transport' Company through its Proprletor Amjad Khan, S/o Kiir. Abdul Sattar Khan, aged about years, R/o Ganj Para, Statlon Road, Ralpur, District - Raipur (C.G.) Narendra Kumar Devangan S/o Shri Bihariial Devangan, aged about years R/o Bhatgaon, Tahsil Builaigarh, Dlstrict - Raipur (C.G.) Asiam Khan S/o Shri Akaram Khan, Aged about 36 years, R/o Nayapara, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.GJ Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Raipur, through its Chief Executive Officer, Zita Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, GE Road, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) Chhattisgarh State Civil Suppiies Corporation Limited, Raipur, throuah its Manaaina Director. Bai 2 ^^ Ashram Parisar, Kachahri Chowk, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) ;ONSTiTUTION OF Preseob Shri P Diwakar, learned Senior Advocafe, with Shri Ashish Surana, counsel for the petitioners. None ror the respondents. l<i:th iVilllt.Il, The foilowing order of the Court was passs T reliefs Fhe petitioners have filed this writ petition for the following "7.1 That the respondents be directed to produce the entire record for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court in respect of the tender process adopted bythem. 7.2 That the respondent No.2 be restrained from accepting the tenders from any part in respect of the works for which the petitioners have aiready been awarded the contract and they have alreadv entered into a.qreement with the 7.3 That, the impugned tender notices dated 11.8.2006 (Annex - P-8) & 01 .09.2006 (Annex P - 9) issued by the Respondent No.2 be set aside/quashed by this Hon'ble Court. 7.4 That the Respondents be directed not to create any hurdle in the supplies which are belng made by the petitioners pursuance to their agreement executed with the Respondent Bank. Any other reiieffs) may also be given to the petitioners, v./hich this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.' •r^r^r^??j^'-^ ;^?£^C3?i3'S£tSua^uaU3^T^^^^^;SS^^'r.;EL^i5i^-L^i^a^^.^^afli®B^S^^ wl^^^^ ^' padma ^-—— —.^^^.^^-^; S^.^-oai8'"'"" ) It is ispute the period of aareement between the petitioners and respondent No.1 has aiready expirec on31s'Mareh,2007. 3) The writ petition, thsrefore, is dismissed as infructuous. 4) Consequently, the interim order dated 04.10.2006 Sd/- ChiefJustice Sdf- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge