$-34 %13.12.2011 w·· Present: Mr. Gulshan Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Maneesh Gumber, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ferida Satarwala, Advocate with Ms. Rachna Saxena, Advocate for R-2 and 3. +CM APPL. 22445/2011 (EXEMPTION) * Exemption allowed subject to just exception. CM stands disposed of. LPA 1054/2011 & CM APPL.22444/2011(STAY) The learned Single Judge has passed order in an application filed by the respondent/workman under Section 17B of the Industrial Dispute Act allowing the said application. The perusal of the impugned order would reflect that the appellant had sought more time to file the reply to the said application and the learned Single Judge rejected the said request finding no justification for granting any further time. In this appeal filed by the appellant challenging that order submission made is that the appellant had already filed the reply to the said application on 13.7.2011 whereas the impugned order is passed on 11.11.2011. It is also submitted that this fact was noted in the previous order i.e. 15.7.2011. In the aforesaid circumstances, the better course of action for the Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified appellant would be to approach the learned Single Judge again and seek review of the said order. If such an application is made within one week from today, we are confident that the learned Single Judge shall entertain this application on merits. The appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. DECEMBER 13,2011 skb I JIV SAHAI ENDLAW,J.