-^ ^-^-of INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT W^P.IS) N0,^" QF 2006 PETITIONER ...••'\'D'^ <-'^s' ^'t>'i<' ^^y- ye^ Anup Kumar Soni, S/o Shri B. L. Soni, aged about 42 years, Occupation - Servfce, presently posted as Sub Engineer, DivisiQnal Office, Urban Administration and Development Department (Engineering Cell), Bilaspur Distt.Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ^s VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^^- €^^ <, -^ A ^l i^ 1 ,^~ T^ State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Urban Administration & Devetopment Department, Mantralaya ,D K S Bhawan, Raipur (Chhatttsgarh) Joint Director, Divfsional Office,Urban Administration & Development Department Btlaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIOM O^ 1NDIA__FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE Q CERTIORARI, AAANDAMUS, PRQHIBLTION OTHER SUITABL WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION^R DIRECTIONS. ORDER Qft ORDERS: XI-HC-78 ?zl *41*IMI Sh*11<h 3 r rt||<<|d<<, 8'ijly'Ko, Rldltfy ,..^^^7^.,^: 200^ sii^i 4ach (yt^°is.ir) 3n^r^irR-ii+ (rarsn^TsRWE ???[TW (ifN'3-n^r ctil^[cl41T1 ETTRHf ^'^^ <f^t'W.l<. ^3Tf^*T3T1^T \ l-9-2006 trbnsfer petitio|ner Mr. Manindra Shrivastdva, Advocate for the petitioner. ' Mr. Vinay Pandey, Panel copy. Heard. 8y this writ petition und^ petitioner has challenged his whereby he has been transferre^d & Development, Bilaspur (Engineipt The case of the Akaltara to Manendragarh vide transferred to Bilaspur vide ord| the ground of illness of his his daughter- namely, Miss Shrai|iha she has to undergo surgery 4 Hospital, Bilaspur. His dau9htei|' there are no proper medical faci In the circumstances, le( the petitioner ma/ be allowed t(( No.l and in turn, respondent t^ learned counsel appeoTin9 for th( l-lavin9 heard learned cou) and circumstances of the case of the case, the prayer made by^ , Senior- Advocort-e with Mr. Afroz Khan, (.awyer for the State/respondents, on advance dauikhter feif ;r ^rticle 226 of the Constitution of India, the order dated 21-8-2006 (Annexure P-1), from Dtvisional Office, Urban Administration ir"in9 Cell) to Nagar Panchayat: Lormi. is that earlier' he was tronsferred from irder dated 6-8-2004 from where he was agoin sr dated 25 June, 2005 on his own request on |hter. Main grievance of the petitioner is that Soni has developed o hole in her heart and or which she is taking treatment at Apolto is r'equired to be kept under observation and ities at Lormi. irned counsel ftir the petitioner submits that make a detailed representation to respondent o.1 be directed to decide the some to which s State/respondents hos no objection. isel for the porties, having regard to the facts without expressmg any opinion on the merits learned counsel for the petitioner is just, fair <riid P.T.O. XI-HC-78 1 sn^T^rf^iNi (WTSn^TgRlri^i Soma ^^f ^ '^~ *<l*1<TTSb*11<<i 3ST '<ll<41rt<<, (SiTflyilS, (s|d|y^< ..c^.ie:.^.^.cc/^ 200^' 3T[^T ira^T (^qfgg^ET) CTdTW Hf5(I'3TI^?T 2- and reasonoble. Therefore, tl^ r'epresentation raising all his gri and its annexures to respondenl respondent No.l is directed to within a period of 30 days from objections raised by the petition) accordance with law. With the direction aforesl Consequently, M.(W.)P.Na| disoosed of. Parties are entitled for c4 \e petitioner .is allowed to md<e a detailed ^vances, annexing o oopy of this writ petition No.l within 10 days from todcy and in turn, decide the representation of the petitioner |the date of its receipt, after considering the ^r in an objective manner, on its own merits, in i|aid, the petition stonds disposed of. 1.3641/2006 & I.A.No.8665/20)6 also stand Wilfa^.T TIIRTf ff fetA rfSRZR ^3;(f^3TI^T 'tified copy of this order. ,^AO° ^^ P.T.O.