/ 1 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6678 OF 2005 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2007 Target Marketing ...Applicant Vs. Systematic Power Devices Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents --- Shri B.K. Ashok for Applicant Shri P.A. Pol, APP for State ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 13TH OCTOBER,2008 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant. It is submitted that only ground on which the complaint has been dismissed by the Trial Court that the statutory demand notice was not signed by the proprietor himself but someone else on his behalf. He invited my attention to the findings recorded by the Trial Court, wherein the Trial Court has by making the said observation, dismissed the complaint on this ground itself. He invited my attention to the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of K.R. Indira vs. Dr. G. Adinarayana reported in AIR 2003 S.C. 4689. 2. Prima facie case is made out for grant of leave. Leave is granted to file an appeal. Appeal is admitted. Hearing of the appeal is expedited. V.M. KANADE J.