1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.886 OF 2010 Sharad s/o Ganpat Shigvan, Age : 55, Occu. Nil, R/o At present District Open Prison, Paithan, Dist. Aurangabad ..PETITIONER VERSUS State of Maharashtra (Through Dy. Superintendent, Central Jail, Harsul, Aurangabad) ..RESPONDENT Mr Deepak K. Rajput, Advocate (appointed) for the petitioner; Mr B.V. Wagh, A.P.P. for the respondent. CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATE : 18th October, 2010 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER P.V. HARDAS, J.) Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission. 2 2. The grievance of the petitioner, sent through jail, was registered as Criminal Writ Petition and when the Criminal Writ Petition was listed before us we had appointed Advocate Shri D.K. Rajput to represent the petitioner in this petition. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that a writ be issued directing the respondents to decide the application of the petitioner which had been submitted by the petitioner praying his release on furlough, on the basis of his P.R. bond. 3. Notice of this petition was issued to the respondents and the learned A.P.P. states on instructions that the application of the petitioner came to be allowed on 11.10.2010 and the petitioner has been released on furlough for a period of fifteen days. In that light of the matter, therefore, nothing remains for this Court to decide and accordingly we dismiss the petition. Rule stands discharged. We, however, quantify the fees payable to the learned Counsel appointed on behalf of the petitioner at Rs.1,500/-. ( A.V. POTDAR, J.) ( P.V.HARDAS, J.) amj/criwp886.10