1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3067 / 2011 (M/s Nagarwala Constructions and others vs. District Consumer Redressal forum and others ) .................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ..................................................................................................................................................................... CORAM : D.D.SINHA & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ DATED : 11th November, 2011 Mr. S.P. Kshirsagar, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the respondent nos. 2 and 6 herein, have filed a Complaint before the District Consumer Forum, Nagpur which was allowed vide order dated 10.4.2006. Against the said order, the petitioner has preferred an Appeal bearing Appeal No. 1094/2006 before the State Consumer Forum and the Appellate Forum vide interim order, only stayed the operative part of the order of the District Consumer Forum reflected in paragraphs 2,3 and 4 thereof. However the operative part of the order pertaining to para (1) of the District Consumer Forum has not been stayed which reads thus: “The O.Ps shall jointly and severally execute the sale deed of the flat in dispute in favour of the complainants at their own cost because the complainants have already purchased the adhesive 2 court stamps amounting to Rs. 49,000./ -” It is submitted that the respondent- complainant filed execution proceedings before the District Consumer Forum under section 25 of the Consumer Protection Act,1986 and District Consumer Forum on the basis thereof issued notice dated 12.5.2011 to the petitioner under section 27 of the said Act. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioner shall prefer appropriate proceedings before the National Consumer Forum against the part of interim order passed by the State Consumer Forum, within four weeks and prayed that till then parties may be directed to maintain status quo. On the backdrop of the above-referred facts and in the interest of justice, we direct the parties to maintain status quo as on today for a period of four weeks from today. The order of status quo granted by us shall automatically cease to operate on expiry of four weeks. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE sahare