CWP(T) No. 5176/2008 11.5.2010 Present: Mr. L.N.Sharma,Advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.M.Bist,Deputy Advocate General with Mr. P.M.Negi,Deputy Advocate General for the respondents. The petitioner was working as a beldar on daily wages. She claims to have discharged the duties of a Steno typist, and, as such, entitled to wages w.e.f. the year 1993. She is also claiming regulatisation of her service as a steno typist. The respondents have seriously disputed the averments made in the petition. Thus, in view of disputed questions of fact no relief can be granted to the petitioner in this petition. Even otherwise the post of a steno typist which is mandatorily required to be filled up in accordance with the Recruitment and Promotion Rules cannot be directed to be filled up by way of a back door entry. Petitioner’s engagement even as a steno typist cannot be said to be in accordance with the Recruitment and Promotion Rules. Hence, no legally enforceable right of the petitioner stands breached and the present petition, devoid of merit is dismissed. Need less to add petitioner shall be considered for regularization in accordance with law and the schemes floated by the Government from time to time. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 11th ,2010(R)