IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND TEN WRIT PETITION No.11815 of 2010 Between: M/s.Kumar Industries, reptd., by its Proprietor-Sri K.Anil Kumar, Sy. No.28 & 31, Burgupally village, Vikarabad Mandal, Rangareddy District, … Petitioner And The Chief Managing Director, Central Power Distribution Company of APCPDCL, Mint Compound, Hyderabad and others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri N.Vasudeva Reddy. Counsel for the respondents: Sri O.Manohar Reddy for R1& R2. None for R.3. This Court made the following: ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondents 1 and 2 in testing and certifying the transformer purchased by the petitioner from respondent No.3, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, Sri N.Vasudeva Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that as the transformer purchased by the petitioner from respondent No.3 has not been accepted by respondents 1 and 2, his client was constrained to purchase a new transformer from an authorized (star-rated) vendor under intimation to respondents 1 and 2. The learned counsel submitted that his client will be satisfied if respondents 1 and 2 get the tests conducted and certify the transformer so purchased. The learned counsel representing respondents 1 and 2 says that his clients will have no objection to test and certify the new transformer stated to have been purchased by the petitioner from the star-rated vendor. Having regard to these submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondents 1 and 2 to get the tests conducted on the transformer stated to have been purchased by the petitioner from the star- rated vendor and issue appropriate certification after conducting such tests. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:01-6-2010 MNR