Criminal Misc.-M No. 33884 of 2011 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.-M No. 33884 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 16.11.2011 Amritpal Singh and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Satbir Gill, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. …… RAJESH BINDAL, J. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed qua petitioner No.1. Ordered accordingly. As far as petitioner No.2 is concerned, learned counsel for petitioner No.2 submitted that initially offences under Sections 323, 324 IPC being bailable, petitioner No.2 was released on bail. However, subsequently, offence under Section 326 IPC was added on account of injury on the left leg of the injured. That injury is attributed to Amrit Pal Singh-petitioner No.1. Injury attributed to petitioner No.2 was found to be simple in nature. Learned counsel for the State did not dispute the aforesaid fact. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions made above, in my opinion, petitioner No.2 is not required to be taken into custody for interrogation. He is directed to appear before the In- vestigating Officer on 26.11.2011 at 10.00 a.m. to join investigation and in case of arrest, he shall be released on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfac- Criminal Misc.-M No. 33884 of 2011 2 tion of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. Petitioner No.2 shall appear be- fore the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for further investiga- tion. Petitioner No.2 shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 16.11.2011 sharmila