IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND ELEVEN PRESENT:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.1209 OF 2008 Between: State Bank of Indore, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Opp. T.S.R.Complex, Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam. …Petitioners A n d M/s B.T.S.Estates Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, Vishakapatnam and another. ..Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.1209 OF 2008 ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 02.11.2007 in C.M.A.No.48 of 2007, on the file of the IV-Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam, wherein the said appeal filed the 1st respondent herein was allowed, setting aside the order dated 24.04.2007 in I.A.No.290 of 2007 in O.S.No.396 of 2007, on the file of the I-Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam and consequently allowing the said IA and granting temporary injunction restraining the petitioner herein from interfering with the 1st respondent’s possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property except by due process of law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the record. 3. The 1st respondent herein filed the suit against the 2nd respondent/D-1 and petitioner/D-2 for recovery of a sum of Rs.86,600/- and for permanent injunction restraining the petitioner bank/D-2 from interfering with the plaintiff’s possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property i.e., Flat No.210 in Sy.No.26/1 Part of Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam. The petitioner/ D-2 filed written statement contesting the suit. The plaintiff also filed I.A.No.290 of 2007 seeking temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC pending disposal of the suit. The petitioner herein filed counter opposing the application. By order dated 24.04.2007, the learned Senior Civil Judge dismissed the said application. Aggrieved by the same, the plaintiff filed C.M.A.No.48 of 2007. The learned Additional District Judge, by the impugned order dated 02.11.2007, allowed the said appeal and set aside the order of dismissal in I.A.No.290 of 2007 passed by the trial Court and consequently granted temporary injunction in favour of the plaintiff restraining the petitioner herein from interfering with the plaintiff’s possession and enjoyment of the suit property. Assailing the same, the 2nd defendant/bank filed the present civil revision petition. 4. While ordering notice before admission, this Court on 11.04.2008 directed status quo existing as on that day to be maintained. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the suit is still pending and the order of status quo is still in force. 6. As the suit is filed in the year 2007 and the main relief prayed is for recovery of money and permanent injunction and the interim relief is seeking to restrain the 2nd defendant bank from interfering with the plaintiff’s possession and enjoyment of property and taking possession thereof, except by due process of law, it is considered that the suit itself can be directed to be disposed of instead of going into merits of the matter at this length of time in the present proceedings about four years after filing of the suit. 7. In the circumstances, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit at an early date, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and till such time, the order of status quo granted by this Court on 11.04.2008 shall remain in force. 8. The civil revision petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 14th September, 2011 Lrkm.