HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 3229/2001 (M/S) Rajendra Prasad Bagri. …Petitioner Versus District Judge, Dehradun and others. …Respondents Shri Sharad Sharma, Senior Advocate assisted by Smt. Indu Sharma, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri R.C. Arya, the learned Brief Holder for the State/respondent nos. 1 & 2. Sri R.K.S. Verma, the learned counsel for respondent no.3. Dated: March 16, 2010 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the part of the impugned order dated 21st June, 1996 passed by the District Judge, Dehradun whereby the learned District Judge while admitting the Civil Revision no. 97 of 1996 issued notice to the respondent/petitioner fixing 09.09.1996 and directed that till the next date stayed the order of the lower Court with regard to payment of Rs. 600/- per month as maintenance, provided the revisionist pays or deposits in the Court at the rate of Rs. 300/- per month. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perusal of the impugned order itself shows that the order impugned is an interlocutory order and the instant writ petition has been filed against an interlocutory order which is not, at all, maintainable. The writ petition, thus, is dismissed. 2 However, the Revisional Court i.e. the District Judge, Dehradun is directed to decide the Civil Revision No. 97 of 1996 (Rajendra Prasad vs. Sunita) expeditiously, if not already decided. (V.K. Bist, J.) 16.03.2010 NCM: