IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERAAD Tuesday, the 14th day of June, 2011 Present: Hon’ble Sri Justice N. Ravi Shankar Crl.P.No. 4442 of 2011 Between: Javvadi Venkata Satya Ngalingachari …Petitioner and The State of AP …Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRL.P.No. 4442 of 2011 O r d e r: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The petitioner is the father of the first respondent herein. The mother of the first respondent for herself and as guardian of the first respondent filed a maintenance case under section 125 Cr.P.C. against the petitioner. The learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Excise), Eluru by her order dated:12-3-2009 rejected maintenance for the first respondent’s mother; but granted monthly maintenance of Rs.1,500-00 to the first respondent herein and that order was confirmed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Eluru on 1-4- 2010 in Crl.R.P.No. 20 of 2009 filed by the petitioner herein. Questioning that order the present petition is filed by the petitioner. 2. It should be noted here that the learned Magistrate has rejected maintenance to the first respondent’s mother on the ground that she is not the legally wedded wife of the petitioner, but granted maintenance to the first respondent herein on the ground that the petitioner is the biological father of the first respondent. Both the courts below considered the evidence and concluded in favour of the first respondent. It is seen that they have held that the first respondent herein is the son of the petitioner and granted maintenance. There is no illegality or infirmity in the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge. Hence there is no reason to interfere with the said order. 3. It may be noted that the relief granted under section 125 Cr.P.C. is a temporary relief and it can be altered at the instance of the petitioner or subject to result of any findings in any proceedings which are binding on the trial court. Hence the petitioner can workout the remedies in that behalf. This petition is accordingly dismissed. _____________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J. June 14, 2011. *BVS