IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 4542 of 2001 Between: V.Satyanarayana Rao, S/o. V.Ramaiah R/o. 30, Venkateswara Colony, Narayanaguda,, Hyderabad-500029. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad. Rep by its Special Officer, Town Planninf Section, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. 2 A.P.housing Board, "Gruhakalapa" Rep by its Managing Director Mozamjahi Market Road, Hyderabad. 3 V.H.Satya Babu R/o. Flat No.13/F1, Ground Floor, Housing Board Colony, Vigyanapuri, Osmania University Road, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction particularly are in the nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the part of the respondent in not demoloshing the illegal construction around B-13/F1, Vigyanpuri, Osmania University Road, Hyderabad, in spite of the Demolition notice in W.P.No.2277/81, dt.2.4.1981 as arbirary, illegal, unjust contrary to law, if necessary also declare proceedings of the 1st Respondent in Lr.No.1961/TPS/C3/MCH/94, Dt.13.5.1996 as Arbitrary, illegal, unjust contrary to law, without the authority of law and violative of fundamental rights guaranteedd to the petitioner under Articles 14 & 21 of the constitution of India and the Constitution guarantee contained under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and issue Consequential Directions to forthwith take necessary steps to demolish the illegal constructions, if necessary by fixing a time frame that the demolotion shall be effected and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.L.RAVICHANDER Counsel for the Respondents: R.RAMACHANDRA REDDY,SC FOR MCH The Court made the following : ORDER: When the matter was called on 03.04.2008, none appeared and it was posted to next week under the caption “for dismissal”. On 10.04.2008 also none appeared and again posted today. Today also none appeared. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:17.04.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{JPK}