IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14506 of 2009 1. UMESH GUPTA S/O SRI BHIKHA GUPTA VILL MANPUR, P.O BARAHI BAZAR, P.S&DISTT- MADHEPURA with CWJC No.14507 of 2009 1. SHAMBHU PRASAD YADAV S/O LATE JAMUN PRASAD YADAV VILL &P.O MANIKPUR, P.S & DISTT- MADHEPURA with CWJC No.14508 of 2009 1. SHAMBHU THAKUR S/O SRI YOGENDRA THAKUR MOH- LAXMIPUR, WARD NO-17, P.O &PS&DISTT- MADHEPURA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE MADHEPURA 4. THE DEPUTY SECREARY MADHEPURA, DEPARTMENT OF PESONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS , GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, ESTABLISHMENT MADHEPURA COLLECTORATE, MADHEPURA 6. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR NAZARAT, MADHEPURA COLLECTORATE, MADHEPURA ----------- 2. 16.11.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State. The petitioners were daily wage appointees on a Class IV post in Madhepura Collectorate. They came to this Court earlier in CWJC No. 13764 of 2006 which was disposed off with a batch of cases directing consideration of their claims for regularisation. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that in the aforesaid applications their contention was that their names were already existing in the panel for regular appointment on Class IV and therefore there was no occasion for the Court to give direction for consideration of their case for regularisation by a three men committee. The judgement of this Court in CWJC No. 13764 of 2006 was delivered on 7.2.2007. The claim of the petitioners has now been rejected by the three men committee in Misc. Case No. 1207 of 2007 on 19.3.2009. The petitioners have suffered the judgement of this Court. They did not challenge the directions given earlier. They took a chance. After the order adverse has been passed they now seek to challenge the same order from which they expected certain benefits. Alternatively in view of nature of their claim and the order of this Court, this Court finds no serious contradiction between the two to warrant any interference. In the entirety of the matter this Court finds no merit in these writ applications. They are accordingly dismissed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)