IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 12743 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : 15.12.2009 Bimla and another .... PETITIONERS Versus The State of Haryana and others ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr. N.D. Achint, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Palika Monga, D.A.G., Haryana, for respondents No.1 and 3. Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate, for respondent No.2. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral ) The petitioners have filed the instant petition challenging the acquisition of their land vide notifications No. LAO (G) – NTLA/2006/1220 dated 6.1.2006 (Annexure P-4) and LAO (G) – NTLA/2006/1277 dated 9.8.2006 (Annexure P-6), issued under Section 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, respectively. It is the case of the petitioners that in the said acquisition, their land comprised in Rectangle No. 107, Khasra No. 14/3, measuring 14 Marlas, has been acquired, on which the residential house of the petitioners CWP No. 12743 of 2009 -2- is existing. Short reply by the Land Acquisition Collector, Gurgaon, on behalf of respondents No.1 and 3 has been filed in Court today. The same is taken on record and its copy has been handed over to counsel for the petitioners. In the short reply on behalf of respondents No.1 and 3, it has been stated that the aforesaid 14 Marlas of land has been released from acquisition. In view of the said averment, made in the short reply on behalf of respondents No.1 and 3, the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE December 15, 2009 ( MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR ) ndj JUDGE