Slngte Bench ^ ^- . |Q d ;.».» IN THB HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Si N0. ^ f02-/2011 PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS ..SSf' .^^ •^...^y^ .^vx^ ••y'f^' ...< \sv ^c^ ' _.T''- fW .-••''-\'\ )-'y » -.-•' 4. Ramroop Ram, S/o. Shri Bodhan Ram., Aged about 51 years, Peon, Posted at Balak Chhatrawas, Janakpur, WadraSaagair, District-Surguja (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Assistant Coinmissioner, Tribal Welfare, Anibikapur, Surguja (C.G.) Block Education Officer, Wadrafaagar, District-Surguja (C.G.) CoUector, (Tribal Welfare) Ambikapur, District-Surguja (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UHDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE coNsrmrrioN OF INDIA 1 '•;>, l/^-- ^ !». iSSS^SSs-, 3 l^. %W^JS E '^t. '% I l'"tl!S:S:S HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT 311.ASPVK. SB : HON'BLE MR. JU8TICB PRITINKBR DIWAKBR W.P.ISt.NO. 6103/2011 PBTITIONBR8 Ramroop Ram versus RBSPONDBNTS State of C.G. 8s Others Shri Chanderesh Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Praveen Das, Dy.GA. for the State. WRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226 OF THE C»NSTITUTIQN OF IMDIA OKDBR (14.10.2011) Grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that though he is entitled for being regularized as Assistant Grade III but till date his case has not been considered and his representation, made pursuant to the order passed by this Court has not been decided. Counsel for the petitioner submits that purpose of filing this petition would be served tf direction is issued to the resp. No.2 to deeide the pending representation of the petitioner within time frame. State counsel submits that the petitioner made representation in the year 2009 and has approached this Court almost after two years and in the facts and circumstances of the case, he be directed to make fresh representation detailing his claim and in tum the respondent No.2 will decide the same in accordance with law. The present petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a detailed representation within two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and in tum the resp. No.2 shall decide the same as expeditiously as possible preferable within a period of three inonths from the date of its receipt. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concemed would be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law. ___—._. Sd/- PritiiiSier Diwaker\ - .Judge