k/' IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARH AT BILASPUR /r WP N0. -S / ? /03 PETITIONER ?^^ \^^-~ y RESPQNDENTS 1) 2) 3) PyTushottam Lal Sahu, son of ^ukaloo Ram Sahu, aged about 30 fi years, occupation - Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Deradih, R/0. Deradih, Tah. - Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS State of Chhatisgarh, through : The Secretary, Department of Panchayat Mantralaya, D.K.S. Buiiding, Rai'pur (Chha±tis^irh). The Chief Executive Ofiicer, Gram Panchayat, Tah. Kasdol, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh). District Collector, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarhl. / WR[T_PETITIQN_ _U_NDER ^ARTICLES 22&f 227 OF THE CONSTITUION 0F INDIA. XI-HC-22 ail^g^I K-6^> ss^s ?b*iiqi tils^ -g^- -t||<ijld<<, ^fllo'is, 1«RTO3T 3^?r xora? ..^..^±\.\t\^,„ Hmwi fhwfi (cl-b'iCT' 3iK?r ^?oiiy< ^rii^ '<>l<<fci'fl-< *<w<rt?41elz^ <Ri«;i< ^raiPaqaii^ DB: H—t'bleJaurttce K. H. tf. Kvamafs, C^J. <k Hon'bte Justice L. C. B|hadoo, J. is/io/awa Petitioner by Smt Renu ^y fhis. writ petitioi^ Constitutton of India Kocher, Advocate. Respondents No. 1 anft 3 by Shri SunJl Sinha. Additional Advocate Oeneral. under Artk;tes 226/227 of fhc • petitioncr baa challenged fhe constitutional validity and t4.e vires of Secdon 36 (l)(m) of the ChhattisgaA Panchayat Rsq fcvaaa Qiam Swaiaj Adhinyam, 1993 (for short tbe Adlucutyam) wh^ch jays down that ao pereon shall be cHgibte to be an oflBce-bcarer |of thc Pstticbayat who has inore than two livlag cfalldrca onc of w^ioin is bom on or aftcr 26th day of Janiiaiy, 2001. Thc chaUengc in view offhe law laid dowa b^ Javed aad otlian* V». State .<!-.. 2002. (n- IL- eq^l to thc abovc clause docs not siuvivc fbe Hon'ble Apex Court in the caae ot of Haryana and atheni arepo»t®dla 2003 AUt 8CW 3892 and al^o in view of fhe order passed by tfus Court in fbe casc of Yaritwant Koaus Sahu Vs. State af CMurttI^jiMrli and ano^her riaswd ia Wrtt Petttioa No. 4fi8 of [Ti^^fe^ XI-HC-22 311^1 •^1 h-fl'h 31^t **<i-*^fOT 'Siit. .-11» T^JtAj,.^ •S^ -^W^, el^l'y'ld, t;«'ll'wi< 3TT^?r "q^? KTOeiT Sb*fl<t) •M 200 31I^?1 ^niIWSfCT -2-- Thc pctitfcwncr has atoo] passed by fhe CoBcctor. In vjew of the above *Wii'l4l-l t(W<"ii41tIA <h<sit ^r aipgir 3ii^[ chaUcaiged thc ordcr ofnaaoval pasacd by thc CoBector, Raipur dat^d 8th •Jaauary 2003 Aanacure P/2. The petitioner has efficacious alt^niative remedy to fifc an appeal before fhe Director of Psauskayat oa|t the feKrttial groiinds against fhe order •Iseax is no foice ia. tiae petitian of flie petiti.oi»er, the same is Uabl^ to bc disaaissed and it is discaissed. Hcwcver, thc petitioncr sba^. be at Kbcrty to fite appeal before the Diicctor of Paachayat E^aia^t fhfi ordcr dated 8th Jaauaty, 2003 by which he has been declared ilisqualified to contnme as office bearer of tfac ViBage Panchayat D^adifa, Tahsfl- KasAol, District-Raipur. Thc petltioner wfll be eutitleif. to the benefit of the tniutatfon for the time spent by ttiem m Bti^ttmg before tfate Court m this writ proceedmg. Tfac partfcs are cntitled Sd/- ChiefJustice for ccrtificd coyy ofthis oider. Sd/- ~C. Bhadoo Judge ^^' [^^fis^ y .'