IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI TUESDAY, THE 18TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 27TH BHADRA 1929 WP(C).No. 25448 of 2007(D) PETITIONER: SARITHA B.NAIR, U.D.CLERK, TALUK OFFICE, KASARAGOD. BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN RESPONDENTS: 1. THE COMMISSIONER FOR LAND REVENUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE ADDITIONAL LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASARAGOD. 4. SANTHOSHKUMAR.S, U.D.CLERK, TALUK OFFICE, IDUKKI. 5. ARUN.D.J., U.D.CLERK, TALUK OFFICE, IDUKKI. 6. BIJI.N.S., U.D.CLERK, TALUK OFFICE, IDUKKI. 7. MAHESH K.U., U.D.CLERK, TALUK OFFICE, WYNAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. BIJOY CHANDRAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V. GIRI , J ========================== W.P.(C) NO. 25448 OF 2007 ========================== Dated this the 18th day of September, 2007. JUDGMENT The petitioner, who was working as Lower Division Clerk in Land Revenue Department, claims that he acquired the requisite test qualification for promotion to the post of U.D. Clerk in 2004. He contends that overlooking seniority about 60 persons including 4 persons who are junior to him were promoted under Ext.P4 order. He has brought his grievance to the notice of the Land Revenue Commissioner under Ext.P6. 2. I have heard learned Senior Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents as well. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the 1st respondent to consider and take appropriate decision on Ext.P6 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after hearing the petitioner as well. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. V. GIRI, JUDGE. rv