IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 2523 of 2011 Date of Decision : May 3 , 2011 Rajinder Singh Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner : Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for respondent No. 1. Mr. G. R. Palsra, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. Justice Sanjay Karol, J. (Oral) In terms of order dated 22.4.2011 petitioner Shri Rajinder Singh stands transferred from G.S.S.S. Mandi (Girls) to G.S.S.S. Dhangiara (Mandi) in place of private respondent Sh. Balbir Bhardwaj. Transfer is vice-versa. Undisputedly Sh. Balbir Bhardwaj has joined the place of his transfer. 2. According to petitioner even though he has almost completed the normal tenure of posting at G.S.S.S. Mandi (Girls), but however, considering the fact that he is physically challenged, Whether reports of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 with disability to the extent of 69%, he needs to be adjusted at a more convenient place which can be at G.S.S.S. Bhangrotu, D.I.E.T. Mandi where the person posted has completed his normal tenure. 3. It is for the petitioner to point out all of the grievances to respondent No. 1. I am sure, considering the physical condition of the petitioner the concerned authority shall take a sympathetic decision by balancing the equities. Accordingly, as prayed for by Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, petitioner is permitted to make a representation, within a period of two days from today, which shall be decided by respondent No. 1, within a period of ten days from the date of receipt thereof. It is always open for the petitioner to avail the leave of the kind due. 4. With the aforesaid observations the present petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. May 3 , 2011 (PK)