1 27 caf.948.11 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 948 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL (stamp) NO. 7240 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. Sandeep Shinde for the Applicant. Mr. S.P.Shinde i/b Mr. M.M.Sathaye for the Respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 10 th June, 2011. P.C. 1 The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents seeks time to file reply. On 2 nd May, 2011, sufficient time was already granted. Hence, no further time can be granted. 2 Perused the application. The averments made in the application have not been controverted. In view of the averments made in the application, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. However, considering the length of delay, the Applicant will have to pay costs to the Respondents quantified at Rs.5,000/-. Accordingly, rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to Applicant paying costs of Rs.5,000/- to the Respondents 2 27 caf.948.11 within a period of four weeks from today. Payment of costs shall be condition precedent. Decree for possession shall not be executed for a period of six weeks from today. [ A.S.OKA, J ]