IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 5411 of 2008. Decided on: 14.09.2010. __________________________________________________________ Surjit Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral): Mr. D.K. Khanna, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw this petition with a liberty reserved to his client to make a detailed representation to respondent No.1 for the redressal of his grievance, within a period of three weeks from today. The petitioner shall make a representation to respondent No.1 within a period of three weeks from today and the same shall be decided by respondent No.1 within a period of two months after the receipt of certified copy of this judgment. He shall pass a speaking order. In case the representation is decided in favour of the petitioner, he will be entitled to all the 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - consequential benefits. The petition stands disposed of accordingly, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. September 14, 2010. (sck).