,ss""- ,11'ilte. i'sisa—i^'. •RI'OI III ^ fiA/rit Aooeal (PR) No. 2751/2010) .^ IC^ Appsiianti ReSDondents/Stati 1 State of Chhattisgarh, Through The \^i^\^i v i/at ~1 tentralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 The En< Resources Chhattisaarh neer-^n-cnier, water Department, Raipur, S ^ii^^-r3 ^^ "eiiiioners 3 The Chief Engineer, Vv'ater Resources Department, Bilasour, ''^Sw:j?^i SS*- Late Khors Rarn (since dead), about 53 years, S/o Late Shri Mogan Ram, R/o Mahantl Coiony, Jainpara, Kai v-,nnaiiisg< ^epresented through its Legal Representatives, as foliows: Teresa Tirkey, aged about 41 vears, Wd/o Late Khora Ram, R/o Viilage Laxmipur (Sandbar, Post Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh Abhinash Kumar, aged about 25 years, S/o Late ora Ram, R/o Village Laxmipur (Sandbar), Pcst Ambikapur, Dlstrict Surguja, 1 (c) Santosh Kumar, aged about 22 y'8srs, S/o Lstfi Khors Ram, R/o V/iliage Laxmipur (Sandbar), Post Ambikapur, District Surguja, ..^/ \J[^ •h!i-- ^—s^.s:^^. 1 (d) Shrava.n Kumar, aged about19 years, S/o Late Khora Ram, R/o Village Laxmipur (Sandbar), Post Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisaarh Wrst Aooea! una i-resent: Shri Kishore Bhaduri, learned Additi Generai for the appellants/ State. Shri K.R. Nair, learned counsel forthe (dth Au The foilQW'sng judgment of the Court was passed Learned counsel for the parties are heard on I.A. No.02/2010, an application for condonation of the delay in fiilng the v/rlt appeal. 2) On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the grouno's taken in the appfication; we are satisfied t'nat the appellanfs./ State has succeeded in showing suff'cient cause for the delay in fiiing the writ appeai, 3) I.A. No.02 of 2010, therefore, is ailowed and the delay in firing the v/rit appeal is hereby condoned. 4) Learned counsel for the parties are heard on admission. 5) The appeliants/ Stcte has f'led this writ appeai against the impugned commc-n order dated 23-11-2009, passed In VV.P.(S5 >.3302/2009 and other connected writ petitions. -^f SUllb' K'l ^7 During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties submitted that the so.ie issue invoived in this writ appeal stands decided by a Divisipn Bench of this Court vide order dated 05-07-2010, passed in Vifrit Appeal Mo. 201/2010 and other connected vvrst appeais. 7) !n t'nis view of the matter, the writ aDpea! is disposed of in terms of the order dated 05-07-2010, pass< No.201/2010 and other connected writ appeals. No order as to cost; Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge