IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY FRIDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2011 / 22ND MAGHA 1932 WP(C).No. 15823 of 2008(H) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- PONNU NADAR, AGED 80 YEARS, S/O. KOCHAPPI, CHANELKARA PUTHENVEEDU, HOUSE NO.467(A), PATTAKULAM, VEERANAKAVU P.O., KATTAKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.BIJU BALAKRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE(RURAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTAKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, NEW DELHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.PUZHAKARA MOHAMMED R5 BY ADV. SRI.M.V.S.NAMBOOTHIRY,SC, C.B.I. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: svs WP(C).No. 15823/2008(H) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1: COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.110/06 OF KATTAKADA POLICE STATION. P2: COPY OF THE POSTMORTEM REPORT DATED 22/03/2006, ISSUED FROM THE DIRECTORATE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. P3: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 3RD RESPONDENT. P4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE HON'BLE CHIEF MINISTER OF KERALA. P5: COPY OF THE INQUEST REPORT 22/03/2006. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE svs BHABANI PRASAD RAY, J ------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.15823 of 2008 ------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of February, 2011. J U D G M E N T Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that the investigation is complete and final report is filed and it is for the petitioner to file a properly constituted complaint before the Magistrate. Therefore, it is open to the petitioner to take steps as he deems fit and proper in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will file a properly constituted complaint before the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Writ petition has become infructuous. Writ petition is disposed of with the afore said observation. BHABANI PRASAD RAY, Judge ami/