IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.21451 of 2008 Date of Decision:22.12.2008 Sanjeev Kumar and another ............... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ............Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present: Mr.V.B. Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR J. ***** This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner No.1 on compassionate ground on the post of Peon or any other suitable post. For the relief claimed, the petitioner has already sent a representation dated 14.07.2008 (Annexure P-4), which is stated to be pending with the respondents. Without going into the merits of the case, we deem it just and appropriate to direct respondent No.2 to take cognizance of the representation dated 14.07.2008 (Annexure P-4) sent by the petitioner No.1 and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of certified copy of this order is presented to him. If the claim of the petitioner is found to be meritorious and decided in his favour then the benefit accruing to him shall be disbursed within four weeks thereafter. It shall be appreciated if a speaking order is passed. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 22, 2008 Pankaj*