IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM-M-27342 of 2011 Decided on 17.10.2011 Sushma Rani --Petitioner vs. State of Punjab --Respondent A N D CRM-M-27830 of 2011 Decided on 17.10.2011 Tanesh Sehgal --Petitioner vs. State of Punjab --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Avnish Mittal,Advocate,for the petitioners in both the cases Mr. A.S.Rai, DAG, Punjab RAKESH KUMAR JAIN,J: (ORAL) This order shall dispose of two petitions bearing CRM-M- 27342 of 2011 (Sushma Rani Vs. State of Punjab) and CRM-M-27830 of 2011 (Tanesh Sehgal Vs.State of Punjab) for anticipatory bail in a case registered vide FIR No. 222 dated 22.8.2011, under Section 498-A IPC, at Police Station Rajpura City, District Patiala. In CRM-M-27342 of 2011, a prayer is made by mother-in-law of the complainant for anticipatory bail that she is 67 years of age and in CRM-M-27830 of 2011, same prayer is made by the husband of the complainant that he is 37 years of age. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they have CRM-M-27342 of 2011 -2- joined the investigation. This fact is conceded by learned counsel for the State on instructions received from ASI Satnam Singh and further states that they are no more required for further interogation. In view thereof, the order dated 08.9.2011 passed in CRM-M- 27342 of 2011 and order dated 13.9.2011 passed in CRM-M-27830 of 2011 respectively are made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. Both the petitions stand disposed of. 17.10.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge