IN THE HI-GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR [Oé CO’NTEM'PT PETTT’IO’N NO. W / 05 Lay /v BTITIONE about 59 years, 31,0, Shri Qhiiki Singh Thakur, R/o. Rambhata Road, Jagatpur, P.O. & Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). 9i]? g/V0(/ Kanhaiya S‘ingh Thakur, aged VERSUS co TE’MNE’R - 1’) S. L Sao D’iv’isional Forest I / Offjéer, éaigam Forest Djw‘sjon, P.O. & Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) RESPONDENT State of C’hhat’t’isgar’h, through Secretary, Department of Foresi, q£y1 9/$‘9\$ / Mantralay, Raipur, P.O. D.K.S. & Distt. Bhawan, ‘Raipur awwgvw‘ 2') (C.G.). gr; CONTEMPT PET1T1ON UNDER 'SECTION V13 OF CQNTEMPT OF COURT ACT. 1971 AND ARTJCLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION PR l , ® “w- HEGH GOURT OF JUDmATURE AT AaiLSPUR ; CHHATT!SHGARH SMGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHR! H.L.DATTU, CJ. Contempt Petiiion No. 196 of 2005 PETiTmNER: Kanhaiya Singh Thakur Vs, S.L. Sac 8: another RE$PONDENTS: x Pregent: r $hri BR. Ghosh, counse! for the petitioner. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 13‘ March, 2007) Ai§eging that the respondents have disobeyed the interim directions issued by this Court in WP. Ne. 403 of 2005 the petitioner is before me in this Contempt Petitton with a request to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents for their wilifui and deliberate disobedience of the order passed by this Court. Admittediy, the order passed by this ‘Court is an exparte order. The petitioner is expected to‘bring to the notice of the respondents about the interim order passed by this Court. if the respondents are not made known'about the interim order passed by this Court it cannot be expected of them to obey the orders and directions issued by this Court. it is not asserted in the petition that the petitioner has brought to the notice of the respondents about the interim order passed by this Court. in the absence of such assertion, it is not a fit case to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents. Therefore, petition is rejected.