XLHC‘QZ f § I WW . ‘ wH/a M i § i, 5 K 5m wumnvvmm. $ m .. y LE. ‘ t m « m” my m m 5 “ m..~,m.m~.mmm..-.mmmwmmu y iConsida'ing the limited petitioner, the petition is taker. vacation, ; According and I A ,No 4641/2003 for urgent hearmg dunng summer vacauon heangg stand dlsposed of i / ‘ ’Ehough this Writ petition is the prayer and consent of learne‘ the respondent, fhe matter is bei1 Admittedly, the petitioner Chhattisgarh and as such he rep; x o listed for orders on M.W.P.‘but on 1 counsel for the petitioner as also Lg nnallygdisposed of. has been allocated to the State of )Ited himself before the respondent t 4' es on116i.10.2002. Thereafter, as 1102— Director, Veterinaxy Servm per Directorate order dated O3. 12 nature of prayer made by the up for healing during summer 1y, IA No 4640/2003 for urgent E2002 ttie petitioner was posted 'at/ ' 'mw m . . I WW§MW § Mmw at an?! m i % i 1 i 03 6 2003 i i i . t E ‘ Shri M.K. Bhaduri, counset for the petitioner. i He i Shri Sanjay K Agarwal, Deputy Advocate General for the Siiiateg < J Shn AJay Shrivastava, counsel for the respondent no 3 t k Heard. J XI~HC~22 § < £ 1 I' 1 i ; ‘ l i x ‘ b i l \ i ‘ 1 x @. k ¥ €:‘€zé1?m&m/W.LWW 2w} .t .1 ..awmqmummmmmnmm m“...m."nm-mamu-m.w.”"mum I » mama-mm “W“aaié'‘vféQaW Disease Investigation Laboratory Jagadalpur, where he joined on 1é/1é/2002. Grievance of the Writ petiitioner is that hardly Within four months of his posting at Jagdalipur he has KW again vide order- Disease investigation Laboratory, It is case of the submitted representations before the: concerned authorities, copies whereof are Annexure P—3 & P—4, lhiéhjk¥ hiaving. not beeli considered W, he has approached this Cohrt for relief. / A prayer is made at the tine of heanl'ng for a giixection to the authorities to consirier the repreSentations, andalso take steps for ~ -1- v i v petitioner that aggrieved with his transfer within four month he had dated 15.04.200g/uansferred tc Dantefdwada. v payrhent of Salaiy which has not aeen paid to him. ~ I In View of the Hmited nature of Rrayeré the petition is disposed of with a direction to the State authorities to dispose of the petitioner’s representations (Annexure P—3 8% P-4) Within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt / commiunication of this order. i It is made clear that the Court is not expres'ging any opinion on the i merits of the petitioner’s claim or contentiibn and representations i I i i v been é 1 f I wmwiwm mmm w g: , ‘ 111 haive rto be cons1dered on 1t s own merits by the authorities. In Judge ‘ l g i 3 w: - " L‘ W ' caé€ gala; has not been pald to the‘pen'tionnr s‘teps‘shonld be, the rule 4 taken gto (ghsburse the Salary ‘as 1s due and adm1531b1e under ‘ Withiri fogirLWeeks from the dattd'oif ’re‘ceipt / eommumcauon of tlns I { V ‘ .V‘ » ; o¥der§ i ”I > ~ 1 W11h the aforesald obse Nauons and duecnons, the wnt I of M W P No 1438/200o, r V‘ V k, ; V 11 pett’uon stands dlsposed Cotxsequently I A Ne 46091' 2003 for urgent tearmg also stand. dlsposed of r A , Cerufied copy as per RuleC. ‘ Sd/_ ‘\ ! P.C.Naik . f