^iw t iNTI-IEHIGHCOURTOFCHHAmSGARHATBII.ASPURTC.G.l WRITPETITION fCyNO. /2006 PBTITIONERS '»' y^.--' ^" /^l Jagdish Cl'landravanshi S/oShri Jagat Ram Chandravanshi, aged aboyt 46 Years, Member, Janpad Panchayat Panclariya, resfclent OfVi]lag& Parswara, TQh§i| Pandariya, District KabirclhaFfl; Chhattisgarh /2. ParasBangani S/o Amar Chand Bangani, aged about 46 years, Vice-President Janpad Panchayat, Pandariya, resident of Mohtra Kurd, Tehsjl Panaariya, Dstrict Kabirclhanl, Chhattisgarh VERSUS ftKg|>ONDENTS ^ ^AO'8"1 -^^.^ ^[yv' ^i^ GV^ w 1. State of Chhattisgarh (a) Through the Secretary Departmentof Panchayat and Rural Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur Chhattisgarh y(b) Through the Secretary^ Finance and Rroject Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh / 2. Collector Being the Prescribed Authority District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh /3. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Pandariya Tehsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh / Shri Harikrishna Joshi ChiefExecutive Offlcer Janpad PanchaYatPandariya Tehsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham; Chhattisgarh ;i ,r';i. •;f"sw .•.•,m;.:i]iBTii (ttaiTlTION -UNbER.ARnCLE 226 OF'TH£'CONSTtrU''TlilW:: tiKBlA.;II^R3SSUANCE.OF?APPROPIUATE^fUt^^'TNI:'^ INAtUlSEOFMANDAMUS.eERTIORARIANDFORISSUANeEtilF iQlTHBIQiUITABLEWRITS.DlRECTIONORDlRECTlONS.TORDEft ORORDERS ^^^ ^^ w^-- :iu~,;.~-^q XI-HC-22 sn^T^r R-ii+a-n^r OTWflfsa' /,- 3;s?^ipncra', s^ftwis, Ricii^y ^...hlf.C.Q.^.^SJ0^. Kl<4dl shW* •••"•••-•••^••••••- ^jf 200 R<)«^ an^TgTcirgTHf^g' »hi'!if<-i4l-f>ii>«iTffto^t<Ri«i< ^srf^R'an^T 18.09.2006 Shri Amrito Das. Couilisel for fhe uetitioners. Shri Satish GuDtd. Dv. Govt Advocate for the State/respondcnt No.l fa). flb) and respondent No.2. Shri Paakai Shrivasta^a, Counsel for respondents No.3 & 4. Heard. The petitioners, who ^re the Member and Vice President of ra. District - Kabirdham fC.G.l. have chatlensed the legalitv aad brourietv ofthat part ofthe resolution dated 21/7/2006 (Annexuke P-15), wherebv, the said Jaapad Jannad Paachavat, Pand; Panchavat bas taken a decl up of the vacancies of Shp vacant on account of promol III to Shikshakanni Grade-Ill Leamed counsel for Ision for takine steps reeardine fiUing cshakanni Grade-III, which has faUea tions made from Shikshakarmi Grade- the uetitioners submits fhat certam. vacancies of Shikshakannil Grade-III have fallen vacant ia the afoi^said Jancad Paachavalt, but fhe same caanot be fffled ia bv the Janoad Pauchavat on adcount ofa clear niaadatorv orohibition issued by the Panchavat an|d Rural Development Deoartment vide its memo dated 6/6/20061 submits that it has been st^ted ia fhe said memo fhat the oosts of Shikshakanni Giade-III. w uromotions shall not be that the action taken bv th^ filed as Aiuiexure P-12. He further luch are Ivias vacant on. account of fiUed in as the restrictioiis of fhe Goveminent in this reeard a|re stiU in operation. His subinission is Jauoad Panchavat after fhe aforesaid XI-HC-22 an^i'^ • R-ti+sn^r shiiitidfer ShWf> << ^•: SST^fPTRpr, »^1u'l<o,Rldl+fy 3TI^T<45|ch —.M.^.W.'^.t..LPt. WVvi\ vhW<h •••"•••••••••••••••• pq- 200 R<3«& 31I^rS^ITWBf5(T prohibition is not ia accordAace with law aud the resolution to fhe saidefFect shoiild be struck behalf of respondents No.3 undertakine that "the said Govenmient contained in m tlllflfl'fl'l WHV\i if fS^S <R|«K ^3rf^|1T311^T down. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava. learued counsel aoDearine on & 4 makes statement and eives oral kJanpad Paachavat is not soms to fiU fhe postsshowii vacaat in. \tiew of the rcstrictions iiaoosed bv the mo dated 6/6/ 2006." His submission. is that in view of this underllakiiie eiven by him in fhis matter, fhis petition niav be disoosed ofl the petitioners are satisfied on behalf of resoondents Noj In view of the aboh?e luidertakias eiven on behalf of respondeuts No. 3 & 4 by Sttri Paakai Shnvastava. Advocate. I am of the opiaion that the erie+auce raised bv the oetitioners in fhis Writ Petition staads redress prosecutine this petition. On the said Tindertakiiie fhat on the basis of the imouaned resolution. fhe resDondents bv the Goverrunent vide iri be fee to take appropriate imoosed bv the Govemment disposed ofon above tenns. at fhis staee as the reliefs clauned bv by fhe said undertakme eiven bv hiui 3&4. £d and fhere is ao necessitv offurfher No.3 & 4 are not eoiag to take further steps for filline up the vacanlcies ia view offhe orohibition imDosed emo dated 6/6/2006, the petition is disposed ofatfhis staee. H<twever, fhe resoondents No.3 & 4 shaU steps if the prohibition ia fhis rceard iis unUfted m due course oftune. Wifh fhe aforesaid ollservations, the petition stands finaUv ^i_.-Q Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge K