CRP 377/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.KATAKEY Heard Mr KR Surana, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr SP Roy, learned c ounsel for the respondents. The petitioner, who are the plaintiffs in Title Suit No.436/2006, by the present petition,sought to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of Constitution of India in challenging the order dated 6th April 2010 passe d by learned District Judge, Kamrup rejecting the petition filed under Section 2 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It appears from the order impugned order dated 6th April 2010 that the g round on which the transfer sought was that the learned Munsiff No.3, during the course of hearing, has passed certain remarks relating to the merit of the suit and as such, the petitioners apprehend that they may not get justice in that Co urt. The ground on which the transfer was sought, as noticed above, cannot be a good and sufficient ground for invoking the jurisdiction under Section 24 of CPC . That apart, because of apprehension expressed by the plaintiffs, learned Munsi ff, before whom the suit was earlier pending, expressed her inability to take up the same for further hearing and the matter was placed before learned District Judge, who, subsequently transferred the proceeding to the learned Munsiff No.3. The petitioners now sought to transfer the proceeding from that Court to any ot her Court, for the reasons that are not good and sufficient. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the present petition, s o as to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of jurisdiction of this Co urt under Article 227 of the Constitution, and hence it is dismissed. No costs.