IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 333 OF 2009 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION WP NO. 1 OF 2008 VILLAGERS OF THE SHIRGAO VILLAGE ... Applicant Versus SIRIGAO NAGARIK SANGHATANA, SIRIGAO GOA AND 7 ORS., ... Respondents Ms. Norma Alvares,Amicus Curiae Mr. A. Kamat, Additional Government Advocate for the respondent Nos.2,3,4. Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr. D. Lawande, Advocate for the respondent No.5. Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. P. S. Lotlikar, Advocate for the respondent No.7. Mr. Sudin Usgaonkar, Advocate for the respondent No.8. Mr.A. F. Diniz, Advocate for the respondent No.6. Coram:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & U. D. SALVI, JJ. Date:- 15th June, 2009 P.C. The grievance which survives,is in relation to two persons whose names were not included and they have not received water tanks and 14 persons' named in Exh.1 along with additional affidavit of Shri Suresh Gaonkar, who have not received tanks at all. The respective Mining Companies state that if these persons have not received the tanks, the Mining Companies are ready and willing to supply the tanks to them. The said 16 persons, therefore, to contact the Deputy Collector concerned and the said the Deputy Collector is accordingly directed to supply tanks to these 16 persons. 2. The other grievance is made in relation to 21 water tanks received by 21 persons on the ground that the same were defective and not of requisite standard, therefore, the same need to be replaced. We permit these 21 persons to approach the Mining Companies through Deputy Collector and the Mining Companies can look into their grievances and if found necessary, can replace the damaged tanks. 3. With these directions the M.C.A. is disposed of. B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. U. D. SALVI, J. SMA