IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.14222 of 2010 1. Uma Kant Rai, son of Jagdish Rai. 2. Hitendra Kumar @ Higendra Kumar Kamat, son of Arun Kumar Kamat. 3. Baleshwar Prasad Kamat, son of Late Laxmi Kamat. 4. Deo Narain Kamat, son of Raj Kumar Kamat. All are residents of Village- Suriyahi, Police Station- Phulparas, District-Madhubani………….Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ………………………Opposite Party. For the petitioners :- Mr. Gagandeo Yadav, Advocate. For the informant :- Mr. Dinesh Choudhary, Advocate. For the State :- Dr. Ajeet Kumar, A.P.P. ----------- 2. 19. 05. 2010. Heard the parties including the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. In a criminal prosecution for offences under Sections 307, 379, 324, 452 and some other minor and bailable offences of the Indian Penal Code, though petitioners are named in the F.I.R. as accused, but specific allegation of assault is against co-accused Sanjay Kumar Kamat, Satya Narayan Kamat and Arun Kumar Kamat. The allegation against these petitioners is general and omnibus in nature. Learned counsel for the informant and the State have strongly opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and they have pointed out that the petitioners were absconding in the case for long. In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender in the court below in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 81 of 2003, within a period of four weeks from today, the above named petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, District-Madhubani, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. and subject to further conditions; (a) that one of the bailors must be Govt. servant or close family member of the petitioners, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioners. (b) The petitioners shall make regular Pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing themselves in person or through representation by their lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioners fail to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners. m.p. ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)