IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-25912 of 2008 Date of decision: 9th January, 2009 Jarnail Singh … Petitioner Versus Ramesh Chand … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. R.S. Longia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate for respondent. KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the respondent states that he has relied upon the agreement to sell (mark ‘A’) in the Civil Court, therefore complainant should not be allowed to delay the proceedings, as he will admit the execution of agreement to sell and he will not raise any dispute regarding the proof of agreement to sell. In view of the statement made by the counsel for the respondent, agreement to sell be taken as a document duly proved on the file of the trial Court. No other opportunity shall be granted to the complainant except to prove the sale deed by calling the witnesses from the office of the Sub Registrar. Sale deed has been marked as mark ‘B’. Therefore, one opportunity is granted to the complainant to prove the sale deed already marked as mark ‘B’. As far as mark ‘A’ is concerned, its execution has not been denied. Since the complainant has been negligent in discharging his duty, he is fastened with a cost of Rs.10,000/-. With these observations, present petition is disposed off. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge January 9, 2009 rps