IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3635 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision 04.03.2011 Rajbir, Major and another ...... Petitioners VERSUS Krishan Kumar and others ...... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL Present: Mr.P.R.Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Pankaj Mehta, Advocate, for Ms.Sunita Nandan, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 to 4. ***** A.N.JINDAL, J: Aggrieved against the order dated 15.05.2010, passed by the Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mahendergarh, allowing the application of respondents-defendants for affixing the ad-valorem Court fee, the petitioners-plaintiffs have preferred the present petition. After hearing the arguments at length, it transpires that the Court has not discussed the principles as laid down in the judgment delivered in case Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh versus Randhir Singh and others 2010 (2) R.C.R. (Civil) 564, obviously for the reasons that the said judgment came later. Even otherwise, the impugned order appears to be non-speaking and deserves to be reversed. In the wake of aforesaid discussion, this petition is accepted; impugned order is set aside and the trial Court is directed to dispose of the application, while considering the aforesaid judgment, by passing the speaking order. (A.N.Jindal) Judge 04.03.2011 mamta-II