Crl. Misc. No. M-30349 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-30349 of 2011 Date of Decision : October 21, 2011 Munfida and another .... Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Jai Vir Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Senior DAG, Haryana with Mr. Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate for the complainant. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Munfida and Napisa alias Nafisa accused have filed the instant petition for anticipatory bail in case FIR No.142 dated 21.10.2010, under Sections 376 (2) (g) and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (in short – IPC), registered at Police Station Chhainsa, District Faridabad. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. The petitioners, on investigation, were found to be innocent by Crl. Misc. No. M-30349 of 2011 2 the police, but have now been summoned as additional accused along with Shabir on prosecution application filed under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Counsel for the petitioners states that Shabir – co- accused has since surrendered in the trial court on 18.10.2011 and was taken in custody and his regular bail application has also been rejected by the trail court. Counsel for the petitioners contended that petitioners are females and they were found innocent during investigation. Keeping in view all the circumstances of the case, but without meaning to express any opinion on merits, the instant petition is allowed. Petitioners shall appear in the trial court on or before 12.11.2011 i.e. the date said to be fixed in the trial court and thereupon, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court. October 21, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE