In the Punjab and Haryana High Court, at Chandigarh. CRM.M 17695 of 2009 (O&M) Decided on Aug 04,2009. Harkishan Das Shah @ Hari Bhai Shah -- Petitioner vs. State of Punjab and another --Respondents. CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.KDS Hooda,Advocate,for the petitioner Mr.Ranbir Singh Rawat,AAG,Punjab, for the State. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J: The petitioner has applied for anticipatory bail in case registered vide FIR No.324 dated 30.11.2008 under Sections 406/420 I.P.C. at Police Station, Focal Point, Ludhiana. The allegations unfolded in the FIR by the complainant are that the petitioner is working as a Commission Agent in the business of ready-made garments and embezzled Rs.11,35,765/-. Before coming to this Court, the petitioner had applied for anticipatory bail before the learned Addl.Sessions Judge,Ludhiana, which has been dismissed on 22.6.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner is an old man and has been falsely implicated in this case, but he could not satisfy the Court as to why he had issued the cheques in lieu of embezzled amount of Rs.11,35,765/- if he had not embezzled the goods of the complainant and why the cheques were CRM.M 17695 of 2009 (O&M) -2- not honoured. He has also failed to comply with the order of transit bail passed by Metropolitan Magistrate, Borivali, Mumbai, directing him to appear in the Court concerned on 4.4.2009. Thus, in my view, the the petitioner does not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail because of his own conduct . Hence, the bail petition is hereby dismissed. Aug 04,2009 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge