CRM No. M 19006 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 19006 of 2010 Date of decision: 23.02.2011 Jagvir Singh Sidhu ........ Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: None for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, DAG, Punjab Mr. S K Sandhir, Advocate for respondent No. 2 -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for seeking permission to go abroad to attend the course by joining Gulf of Aden Shipping Co. LLC Post Box 15339, Dubai, U.A.E. and also for exemption from personal appearance in Complaint case No. 249/1 of 13.09.2007, titled as Gurdial Singh v. Amarjit Singh and others, under Sections 452, 323, 506, 427, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of SDJM, Jagraon. The Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jagraon, vide order dated 13.04.2010, dismissed the application seeking the aforesaid relief on the ground that the documents placed on record were not sufficient to CRM No. M 19006 of 2010 2 support the plea that the petitioner wanted to undergo the career course and that the issuing authority of the said certificate has not affixed the date as to when the same was issued. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred revision petition against the aforesaid order dated 13.04.2010 passed by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jagraon before the Sessions Judge, Ludhiana. However, the same was allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 14.06.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana. Hence, the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed. The present petition was filed way back on 21.08.2010. Neither the learned counsel for the petitioner nor the petitioner himself was present on the last date of hearing, when the case was taken up for hearing i.e. on 08.11.2010. Today also, no one is present on behalf of the petitioner. It is, therefore, apparent that cause of action does not exist any more as on date. Moreover, no date has been mentioned when the petitioner wanted to go abroad to attend the said course. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge 23.02.2011 mohan