G (%‘\QQ/‘/L/ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ma.) w. P. (S) N0.?W3 OF 2011 PETITIONER / Rajendra Kumar Rathore S/o Ramdhan Rathore, aged about 48 years, R/o Nandourkhurd, Police Station -— Sakti, District — Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), SubEngineer posted at . Keshkal (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1 . State of Chhattisgarh / through — The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralay, Dau Kalyan Singh E-hawn, Raipur (C.G) The Additional Secretary, State of Chhattisgarh, Public Works Department, Raipur (C.G.)_ The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Bastar region, Jagdalpur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under:— HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 7483 of 201 1 PETITIONER : Rajendra Kumar Rathore. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ' SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: Shri Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. I Shri Arun Sao, Government Advocate for the State/ respondents. O R D E R (Passed on 12‘}; day of December, 20 1 1) Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 16.11.2011 (Annexure P/l) whereby the petitioner, working as Sub Engineer, Keshkal Divisiom Kondagaon, has been transferred to Beejapur Division, on administrative grounds. 2. Shii Shivastavm learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has served in a scheduled area for more than 18 years, thus, he has made an application for consideration of his case for his transfer and posting at a non-scheduled area in View of the policy of the State, wherein, it is prescribed that aiier having completed five years of service in the scheduled area, an employee should be considered for transfer and posting on the basis ofthe option exercised by him. 3. Since the petitioner has already made an application, aforestated, on 23.11.2011 (Annexure P/8), which is pending consideration, thus, at this stage, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. 4. In View ofthe above, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/— Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ‘ 1 i Amit.