IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15319 of 2011 KANCHAN DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 17.05.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Sections 366A and 372/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation in the F.I.R. is that on 09.07.2010, one daughter of the informant and other daughter of neighbour went missing. The suspicion was raised against the petitioner since the victims used to go to watch movie in the company of the petitioner and when the petitioner on telephone accepted that the girls have fled away. For the occurrence of 09.07.2010,the F.I.R. was registered on 15.07.2010. The 164 Cr. P. C. statements of both the girls have been brought on record as Annexures-2 and 3. It appears that the victim Nilam Kumari has stated that both girls went to watch movie from there this petitioner entrusted them to four persons and boarded them in a train with other persons whereas other victim 2 Babita Kumari has stated that she was taken away at 9.00 P.M. by this petitioner for seeing movie in the house of Lalu Mandal. Two versions being narrated by two girls in two different manners. Considering the delayed lodging of the F.I.R. and inconsistency between the F.I.R. as well as 164 Cr. P. C. statements of two victims create doubt about the bonafide of accusation, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Bhimpur P.S. Case No. 23 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Supaul, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)