UZ\^Q_ IN THE HON»BLBHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (S) NoAl6i /2011 PETITIONER: Suresh Kumar Jaisawal S/o Shri Ramnarayan Jaisawal, aged ^ .^** ,..^ J^/| about 51 years, Upper Division ^ •^<5'^/?^' Teacher Govt. Middle School, ^' ...-'" ,<^" ..-: ^'"""" ^-•"•'" RESPONDENTS: VERSUS ^" 1. Nargoda, Block- Masturi Distt. Bilaspur(C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh Through: - Secretary, Department ofEducation Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) The District Education Officer, District -Bilaspur (C.G.) The Block Education Officer Block- Masturi Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Joint Director, Treasury, accounts, pension, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 2. ^3. ^",x 4. ^^2%^ ff'^^ \\ HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BlL^sJPUR SB : HON'BLB SHRI JUSTICB PRITINKER DXWJUECgSR W.P.(S) N0. 4168/8011 PETITIOH'BR Suresh Kiuaar Jaiswal Versus RBSPONDBNTS State ofC.G. & Otliers .WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTXCLE 226/227 OP THB CQHSTITUTIOH^OF INDSA Aooearance: Shri Ashwiai Shukla, couBsel tbr fhe petitioner, N.Naha Roy, P.L. for tiie State. QRALORBBR (01.08.2011) Wifh the consent ofthe partieSy the ma.tter is heard fiaally.. The petitioner was mitiaBy appointed as Assistaiit Teacber on a fixed pay ofRs, 1.50, After com.pletion of Ms probation period, he was graated regular pay scale ofRs. 169-300, Leamed counsel for the petitioxier submits fhat th.e above issue has been considered by the M.P. State Admioistraitive Tribuiial, Jabalpur m 0<A< N^ 274S/89 between Modhafcant ycadu and 56 others Vs. SSSxste ofM^P. <md others, whereia it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entifled to regular pay scale witfa effect from the date of iiiitial appoio.tm.ent. The matter was takeu iip to fhe Hon'ble Supreme Court, The appeal was disniissed by the Honlble Supreme Court upholding the decision of fhe Tribunal to .fhe effect .fhat the Teachers/Assistaat Te.ache.rs are entitled to regular pay scale froni fhe date ofinitial appoiatment. It is further subjaaitted that this Court while considering the same issiie iu W.P^ (3) N^ 472S/2006 bettveen Amar Sed Rosn & Others Vs- Stcste ^f Chhc^tlsgarh nnd Whers by order-dated 01.09.06 allowed the petitioners to make a representation with.io. a period of ten days, raisio.g all tfie grievazi.ces. ^ Accorimgly the petitioner is graated liberty to make a representation raising aU his grievarices in fhe Ilght of fhe aforesaid judgment and fhe circular dated 05.01.2011 (Atinexure P/2)^ aod iii tam fhe conceraed respondent is directed to decide the reprcsentation, if aiiy, in accordance with law^ on its own nierits, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation subject to verification of the facts. In view of fhe foregoiag^ fhis petition is disposed of No order as to costs. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge