AB 1237/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE C.R.. SARMA Heard Mr. A.M. Buzar Baruah, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State- respondent and Mr. P. Kataki, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the inform ant. Perused the Case Diary. The petitioner is the husband of the informant and they were married before four teen years and have two children. It is submitted, that the informant and her tw o children are presently staying in the house of her uncle. The petitioner is already on pre-arrest bail w.e.f. 09.05.2011. Having heard the learned counsel, appearing for both the parties and considering the future prospect of re-union between the said couple, I am of the considered opinion that, release of the petitioner on bail will not adversely affect the i nvestigation in any manner. In view of above, the interim order, dated 09.05.2011 is made absolute, subject to the condition that, the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Offi cer as and when so required. It is further provided, that the petitioner shall n either interfere with the investigation nor intimidate the informant in any mann er. With the above directions, this A.B. Application is disposed of. Return the Case Diary.