IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 4745 of 2011 Raj Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Rahul Chatwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Jattana, Addl.A.G, Punjab for the State. ***** RANJIT SINGH J. State counsel has pointed out that this is a dispute between father and son, who was staying in the same house. As per the State counsel, a serious litigation in regard to the house is also in progress where son as well as father have filed various civil suits. They are staying in the same house. The father perhaps wants the son and his family to be evicted from the house against which they have already obtained injunction order from the civil Court. It is because of this litigation perhaps, the petitioner has chosen to file the petition to seek direction for his protection, but in my view, the State has taken adequate measures and action and no further orders are called. Dismissed. November 25, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE