IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1436 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1336 OF 2007 Mohammad Jameel Mohammad Ameen ..... ......Applicant. V/s The State of Maharashtra ... ...... ......Respondent. Mr.N.R.Bubna, Adv. For the applicant. Mr.Y.S.Shinde, APP For the respondent. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 22/1/08 PC: The applicant has been convicted for the offence under section 135(1)(b) of the Electricity Act, 2003, sentenced to suffer RI for two years and fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default RI for four months. The applicant as well has been convicted under section 138 of the Electricity Act and sentenced to suffer RI for one year and fine of Rs.5000/- in default RI for two months. Both the sentences are to run concurrently. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was on bail during the trial and has not mis used the same. In view of the fact that there is no likelihood of appeal being taken up for final hearing before expiry period of sentence I deem it appropriate to direct that the applicant be released on bail on same terms and conditions on which he was released on bail during the trial on executing fresh bail bonds. Application stands disposed of. 22.1.08