RSA No. 3243 of 1985(O&m) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No. 8489-C of 2009 and RSA No. 3243 of 1985 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 06, 2009 Smt. Bimlesh Rani ...... Appellant Versus Smt. Jaswant Kaur ...... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari Present: Mr.J.L.Malhotra, Advocate for the applicant-appellant. **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Ajay Tewari, J. For the reasons recorded this application is allowed. Order dated 15.07.2009 is recalled. In this application another prayer has been made that summons be issued to the appellant on the ground that he has taken away the brief from the counsel. In my opinion no occasion arises to issue summons to such a party. Of course, if a case is unrepresented at the stage of final hearing due to no fault of the appellant, such as death of counsel etc., it would be incumbent upon a Court to issue notice to such an appellant but where an appellant himself takes away the brief from the counsel and none has entered appearance on his behalf at the time when the case is called there is RSA No. 3243 of 1985(O&m) no option for the Court except to dismiss the same in default. Consequently RSA No.3234 of 1985 is dismissed for want of prosecution. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE August 05,2009 sunita