i.' -^ ^ IN THE HON'BLrfHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A. No. ; O X of 2009 Siiigfe ^ APPELLANT/ ^ laintiff ^" Deepak Jain, S/o Hazarimal Jain, aged about .^.Q... years, Occupation-Business, R/o Village- Dondilohara, Post & Tahsil- Dondilohara, District-Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS/ ybefendants ^•••' .^s- :-"^0)'" '^Av .tf) Gajendra Prasad Sharma, S/o Late Shri Radheshyam Sharma, aged about not known, R/oWardNo.11,Village- Dondilohara, Post & Tahsil- Dondilohara, District-Durg (C.G.) ^. State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Durg, District-Durg (C.G.) MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 (r) OF C.P.C. fy^ 3=F?^r'^T ^i^h ^T^T 3;n^?I 'SOTW T! Kvr <L i ^ ~S^ ^wm^, ^ttl<H*Ko, f®i<r{i<H^< . ^.A. (NO. /O^/ ^lU^l (bHk<fe"" """""" """f"^ 100 '* 37I^T "^^ (u|4i^«t^) ^TcHW^ftn ^I^ <^»H(^ti1n ^R^ft "if fec^ <Mt^i< ^3{^^?^r S.B. Hon'bEe Shri Justice N.K. A^arwaS 12-11-2009 Shri D.N. Prajapats, counset|for the appellant. Shri Sanjeev Agrawal, Pan^I Lawyer for the State/respondent No.2. Heard. Shri D.N. Prajapati, learned| that this appea! may be disposed <^f with a direction to the trial Court to decide the suit within a stipulate' Prayer is not opposed as th^ same is reasonable. Accordingiy, the appea! is Searned triat Court shail decidel preferabiy within a period of six mcj counsel for the appellant submits Ei time. disposed. it is directed that the the suit as eariy as possible 'nths in accordance with law on its own merits. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge •^w^mvS^^-!K:i^^^w^»i- •w^'K^'^s'.:.::y-wy.v'^»ty---'\