C “g M 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION S Nb.623g OF 2011 PETITIONER x Angad Ram Chandrakar S/o Late Devsinh Chandrakar, aged about 59 years, occupation service, presently posted as Headmaster, primary School Sawani; Block — Patan , District Dur (c.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Collector, Durg, Tahsil & District Durg (Chhattisgarh). District Education Officer, District Education Office, Near Multipurpose School, Durg (Chhattisgarh) Block Education Officer, Block office, Dondilohara, District Durg (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA « g g ”4%“1 uGUn; O: CHHATTFGARH aiL SPLJR mT F‘ TmON ($5) No. 5238 CF 2G“ irBi‘xiER Anoad Rant Chandrekar : E¢$>GNDENTS StM-tef aaf‘sgam Gihefs MM? getiéma Lime? Artick 226 of the Co§1st§tut§an of mdia) Singie Bench : Hon’b1e Shri Satis‘n K. Agnihoiri, J. Pmsent :- umbh Sharma, Aavacate for the petmoner. $hr§ Ajii SEngh, Panel Lawyer fer the State. LRF‘ER {CRB‘L} (Pasged o ;s O! day sf baptembar 20’! 1‘ uhQ; a ' z ' b pemron s f0 EH: o er dated 15.G7.2i‘)4.1 (Annexure 3 P4), whereby ‘he eetitioner working as Headmesier at Primary acme: Sawani Fatah). he's been iransferreci to Wimary School ona'aa‘ Ln admm.stratwe qmunds Leamed aeunse? aapeai’ing for ihe eatitiener submits that unéer the {anefer pe§§¢y defed 9% 2014 ’Amexure 2) it Is cieaany stated max $3 $c%§ec‘zer aiene §s campeten’i to transfer the empicyees ’eeéemmg ta (Ease-m & W sewices Gn pfopesai made by the other éepartneme m " wave: ofthe minis€er in-Ghange. in the caee on harm}. it aneears the? the Distfict Educahon Officer. Dam. whhout fo§§owina the guideiihes issued in the transfer pehcy had paseed ihe omier impugnedywhen the Coiiecior has been ase%gned the {espensibiii‘ry ef tfansfey' of the empioyees working in the concerned disirict. on propoeai of the concerned departments. Thus, this suffers from the defect of competenee of the officeri Acoordingiy. the transfer is uneusiainaioie in the eves of iew. As a resuiz. the transfer order dated 15.97.2m‘i {Annexure P4) in respect of the petitioner is quashed. However, tiberty is reserved to the g vernment to pass an appropriate order, if so advised, in eooordanse with admtnietrati‘v‘e exigencv and in public poiiov. in aceordenee with iew; . koordinotv. the writ netition is eiiowed to the above-extent No order Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge A” CU s: HA O I\) )Q 5$hCK 3hr: o