N THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT I foam/5% BILASPUR (c.G.) PETITIONER: K’ Sharad Chandra Komalwar Aged about 37 yrs S/o Shri Anirudra Komalwar R/o, C/o Mr. Ravi Shrivastava Infront of Dandkaranya Samachar, Vrindavan Colony, Jagdalpur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: /, 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Tribal Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) . Commissioner Scheduie Castes and Scheduie Tribes Development Department Pandit Ravi Shankar Shukla University Campus, Raipur (C.G.) a . . Hi gsh-Power y Caste Certificate Scrutinv Committee Through Vice President cum Director, Adim Jati Anusandhan Evam Prasllikshan Sansthan, St‘ate of Chhattisgarh, _Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Premises Raipur (C.G.) 4. President Adim Jati Anusandhan Evam Prashikshan Sansthan, Raipur (C.G.) [5. Secretary, Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) PETITION QNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROERIATE WRITS OF m: MANDAMU§ AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER §UITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTION§:- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 911 of 2009 PETITIONER : Sharad Chandra Komalwar. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : State of Chhattisgarh & Others. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OEINQIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: Shri Jitendra Pali, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.S.Kachhwaha, Dy. A.G. with Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, Dy, G.A‘ and Shri N.N‘Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State/respomlenl, N0. 1, 2 and 5. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 06“ day of September, 2010) Grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent authorities; have declined to verify the caste certificate dated 30.01.2006 (Annexurc P/l) issued to him by the Sub Divisional Magistrate (City) Raipur, stating that the petitioner is entitled to the get the caste certificate. verification of the caste certificate and further, benefit of i‘eservntim under scheduled tribe category from the State of Mahrashtra and not from the State of Chhattisgarh, vide order dated 2&042009 (Anncxurc R/l) passed by the respondent No. 3. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly and fairly submit that‘this case is squarely covered by the decision ol' this Court rendered in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria v. State (g/ Chhattisgarh & Others' and other connected matters, wherein this Court after c0r§idering all the aspects of the matter and al‘tcr n considering the law laid down by the Supreme Court in umptee number of the cases, in para 26 of the judgment and order has made certain clarifications for verification of the caste certificate. In View of foregoing, the writ petition is disposed of, The Committee is directed to proceed in accordance with the decision of this Court rendered in Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria (supra) and other connected nlatt€rS. Satish K. Agnihotrn i Judge ‘ WP (S) No.3338 of 2007 decided on 19—8—2010 ’ 1 Sdl- ”‘ t