THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Petition No.5994 of 2009 Dated: 19th August, 2009 Between: R.K.Kishor …Petitioner and The State of A.P., rep. by its by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. …Respondent *** THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Petition No.5994 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner apprehends arrest in Crime No.168 of 2009 of P.S., CCS, Hyderabad, registered for the offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. 2. Dr.P.H.C.Gowda, Retired Medical Practitioner presented a report before XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, alleging inter alia that the petitioner herein induced him to part with Rs.62.00 Lakhs spreading over three years i.e., from 24.06.2006 to 21.02.2008 on the promise of launching a project of awareness programme on prevention and control of HIV/AIDS and STI. After receiving the money, the petitioner did not respondent to his call nor the project is materialized. Details of amounts paid by him are mentioned in the complaint. The said complaint came to be forwarded to the Station House Officer, CCS, DD, Hyderabad, under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Thereupon, the SHO, CCS, DD, Hyderabad, received the complaint and registered a case in Crime No.168 of 2009 for the offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. 3. Heard Sri C.Padmanabha Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent/State. 4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner himself is a victim in the hands of Mr.Smith M.Mathew and Mr.Minu Mathew and he presented a complaint before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Vijayawada and his complaint came to be forwarded to the Station House Officer, Vijayawada I Town Police Station, which formed the basis for registering a case in Crime No.528 of 2008 for the offences under Sections 405, 420, 427 and 506 r/w.34 IPC. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent/State opposed the application on the ground that the investigation is pending. 6. I have gone through the complaint presented by the petitioner against Mr.Smith M.Mathew and Mr.Minu Mathew. The petitioner claims to have parted Rs.22,25,000/- between 06.03.2006 to 03.07.2006 to the said persons. Whereas in the complaint presented by Dr.P.H.C.Gowda, it is stated that the petitioner received Rs.62.00 Lakhs from him during the period 24.06.2006 to 21.02.2008. Therefore, the complaint filed by the petitioner is of no avail to contend that the amounts received from the de facto complainant has been transferred to the accused in Crime No.528 of 2008 of Vijayawada I Town P.S. In view of the quantum of amount involved and pendency of the investigation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. (B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J.) Date:19th August, 2009. cs