^^ XI-HG—78 sn^v ^i R-fi* ^STT STI^T^lN? •«5l '?=[ '<||q|y4|, ®t)ly<|S,[qdl.yy HWWI Vhw«h••••••--•--•--•••-••--•-•••-•T^ 200 SII^T Tra^T (llcif^'si<^i) Wiiw ^iter sti^i SIN6LE BENCH: HON'BtE JUSTICE &HIRENDRA MISHRA W.P. (Petition U/A 226/Z PbllllONERS 1. ChHattisgarh thr< Sta- (C6; Z.The Executive Engineer (O&M), Chhjsttis9'u"h State Electricity Board Url<|, Raipur (C6) Vs R6SPQN&ENT M/s. PlotN 24.07.2008 Shri R.S. Jaiswal, Sit Advocate for the petitioners.| Heard. This petition is direc( (Annexure P-11) whereby •tiie| regarding maintaihflibilit/ of cji bythe learned Sole Arbitrato|> Heard leamed Senior Oe This petition is d irectet Sole Arbitrator. t:»t(<il<n<fli *ii*i<rff ^ffs^^K^K ^atfiwsii^r 1 N0.2S98/2008 27 of the Constitution of India) State Electricity Board, ugh the Chairman, Chhatt-isgarh is Electricity Board, Dangwiia, Raipur naba Steels Pvt. Ltd Regd. Office- ?.17, SBI.Colony, Fafcdih, Raipur (CS) Advocate with Shri Yogesh Pandey, •ed against the order dated 21.5.2007 preliminary objection of the petitioners •bitration proceedings has been rejected •unsel for the petitioners. against the interim order passed by_ihe ^^•i^-t^^^s^^ an^t^i^nr "?WT 3T1^T^i*lIqi ^ T5[ -Sffq^pT^ ©ifll'H'Ko,fs|i?liyj,< HWWI awrai Wt, 200 311^11T5RT (ijc|(j«<<^ET) t^nw ^ifro sii^t _ 7. . In the matter ofS.B.P another reported in 2005 (8)| Para-45 hetd thus;- "45.The object of minimiz^ig matter is in the process of be defeated if the High Court could be <ipproach|ei Constitution of India or of India against every Therefore, it is necessary t^> has commenced in the arbil until the award is pronounjced appeal is available to them an earlier stage. In view of the above maintainable unless the Therefore, the in< C<Ajrt under ord&r <DI<ltCT<fl*1 *tl+1Cli ^ fs<<il <f<'t^K, ^affiiH3ii^!i |5 Co. Vs. Patel Engineering Limited & 5CC 618, the Hon'bte Apex Court in judicial intervention while the (>eing arbitrated upon, will cert'ainly could be defeated if the 1-ligh sd under Article 227 of the Article 226 of the Constitution made by the arbitral tribunal. indicate that once the arbitration i|tral tribunal, parties have to wait unless, of course, a right of ubder Section 37 of the Act even at judgment, the instant petition is not final awjird is passed by the arbitrol tribunal. istant p^tition is dismissed as not maintainable. Sd/- Dhto-ndraMisbr3 y-—"Judge BE