IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.210/2009 Decided on:3.3.2011 _____________________________________________ Parkasho Devi. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Sunil Mohan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ansul Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. Tarlok Chauhan, Advocate for respondents No.5 to 7. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). In view of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in Surekha Kumari versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, CWP No. 282 of 2009, decided on 3.6.2010, the present petition is allowed. Annexures P-10 and P-13 dated 6.2.2008 and 23.12.2008, respectively are quashed and set aside. The matter is remanded to the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Deputy Commissioner, Hamirpur. He shall decide the same within a period of three months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. He shall pass a speaking order. The interim order dated 20.1.2009 shall continue till the disposal of the matter by the Deputy Commissioner. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 3.3.2011 *awasthi*