IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.238 of 2009 RADHA SHANKAR PANDEY . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. . ----------- 3. 18.8.2010 Having heard counsel for the parties, I.A. No. 565 of 2009 for condonation of delay is allowed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was a typographical mistake in Paragraph-16 of the writ petition and instead of the words “relieved” the word “retired” had been typed. He submits from a supplementary affidavit filed today that the scheduled superannuation of the petitioner is September, 2014. Upon hearing counsel for the State, this Court is satisfied that the review application is fit to be allowed. It is accordingly ordered. The writ application is disposed off with the observation to consider the representation of the petitioner as noticed in the order dated 2.9.2008 in C.W.J.C. No. 2205 of 2001 in the following terms:- “ The petitioner bases his claim on Annexure-1 by which he represented to be sent for training or in the alternative to consider his case for promotion without training” Let such consideration be done and appropriate 2 orders passed within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)