hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.232 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.232 OF 2008 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.232 OF 2008 WITH WITH WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.110 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.110 OF 2008 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.110 OF 2008 Mohinder Varma ... Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. Respondents Mr. Rahul Karnik for the Petitioner. Mr. P.S.Hingorani, A.P.P. for State. Smt. Madhuri Gaikkwad for R. No. 5. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATED: OCTOBER 08, 2008 DATED: OCTOBER 08, 2008 DATED: OCTOBER 08, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. . In our opinion, this will not be a fit case for this court to exercise extra ordinary jurisdiction. The contention of the Petitioner is that Respondent No. 5 by seeking licence through State Respondent, got licence before it was incorporated. The Petitioner was one of those drivers, who drove the vehicle owned by Respondent No. 5. . The Petitioner, if aggrieved, has a remedy by way of filing a criminal complaint or pursuing such other remedy available to him. This would not be a fit case in extra ordinary jurisdiction. Hence, petition dismissed. (A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.) (A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.) (A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)