IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11145 of 2010 MD. IMTEYAZ, SON OF MD. NOOR MOHAMMAD, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-TIKARI, WARD NO.13, AURANGABAD, P.S. AND DISTRICT-AURANGABAD. ………………………………………………….PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR……………….OPPOSITE PARTY. --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, Advocate. For the State : Mr. B.B. Prashant, A.P.P. For Union of India: Mr. Md. Abu Haider, C.G.C. --------- 2. 22.4.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State as well as the learned counsel for the Union of India. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 20 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been named in F.I.R. in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused persons, however, he was not apprehended on the spot. It has also been submitted that there is no recovery of contraband articles from his possession and only on suspicion that the petitioner was one of the associates of - 2 - other co- accused, he has been implicated in this case. It is also stated that the petitioner is having clean antecedent. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, Md. Imteyaz, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in connection with Aurangabad Town P.S. Case No.12/2010 and G.R. No.1/2010, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be the close relative or his family member, who will file affidavit before the court below giving full genealogy showing his or her relationship with the petitioner. Further, after his release in this case, if the petitioner is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. P.S. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J)