^l *€' ^»: ll-y; X '.^| \ '^ IN THEHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) N0. ^'&S2- / 2006 Petitioner ^g^ ^.>-""( \0 lp>'^y r^-"'/ ^^' ^6B- i^" Resbondeht's HemantKumar Vishwakarma,^ S/o. Shri Chudamani Vishwakarma, Aged about 36 years, Asst. Teacher, Govt. Primary School, 1-lathitikra, Block- Nawagarh, Distt. - Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ^- VERSUS ^^^. ^^:; \- '~y1^.' • tt,v';Sv1 ff'H *:i v- ^y-!'^\^W""ff ;'%s-"7^'V)"K<?^ •"^^•^^ '-•.t^y'^o-y.^ S^^GO^ ^3y '^^.G'v" •• ^v>."', . ;:, ~<5S^'_^ ^^•'. ', " ' WRIT PETITION 1. State of Chhattisgarh & Others^ Through- The Secretary, DepartmentofSchoolEducation D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Educ^tion Officer,^ Distt. - Janjgir -Champa (C.G.) 3. Block EducationOfficer,^' Block—Nawagarh Distt. -Janjgir-Champa(C.G.) UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OFINDIAFORISSUANCEOFSUITABLEWRIT. WRITS.DIRECTIONETCTODOJUSTICEINTHEMATTER. HIGH GOURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (sl Nb. 5862 of2006 Petitioiier Respondents ItetitionCT Respoiidents Ftetitioner Respondciits Hemant Kuinar Vish'WEdkamia Versus StateofCUhattis^ulifiBoflicrs W. P. (slNo. 5871 af 2006 Versus Kumar Rathore State ofChIiattisgarIi& ofhers W.P. (s) No. 5849 of3006 Satish Kumar Thrari Versus State (rfcaihattisgailt & others w- Sia^te Bcadi: Honlate Mr. Justtee Satteli K. AgnUtotel. Shri Anil Singb. Rajput, Advocate for fhe PetitioiMa-. Shri V. V. S. Moorthy, Deputy Advoeate General with Smt Anju Ahuja, Depuly Qovt Advocate forthe State/respondents. ORDBR , (Ftessied 6n this 12al day of necemher, 2006) « 1. The petitkKiera are woiking as Assfatant Tcaehera ia fhc goverument sehot^. In. fhe oozusc of their seivices as Assistant Teacbeis.'Bie petittonets have pbtamed D.Ed. ccrtifieatcs on fheir own expenses before 1.3.1999. 2. Learaed counsel for fhe petitioDera subnuts fhat fhe 'Basfc Tiainmg tostitute' (B.T.I.) certificate has beea renamed by the oider of (be State Govenunent as Diplonna in Education' (D.Ed.) ccrtifi.cate. The petitioners, whp have obtained D.Ed. certificate priorto 1.3.1999 arecntBtledtofhesameFeUefasispan.tedtofhe candidates wbo had obtamed B.T.I./B.Ed. eertfflcatea On •fheir owa expenses as per the ciiculara dated 24.12.1998 and 1.3.1999. 3. Leamed Deputy Advocate General, appearing &r <tus respondents/State, piodiiced a copy of the nnemo dated !T^ •^•H-- r.G 12.A2.20(^ mgaM toy ^tfae^^^^ ^ Clijhattjagsuli, imtti» datf^?% issucdt Iqr;ttie Secreteiy, Boaid crf Siteoadary Bdueaticui, Bliopal, and fhe piospectus^ ®f DifSaa^ ia. E&QGatimi ^^s^vns'^i^ s^rtnriit-a fliat^ (fae mmienclature (tf^^ B^k^'Fiainmg^^ renamed .as IMpltMBa m EdaGatitA Adv6(:ate GeTOi^ alsa' prod^ coify af ih^ ciscates S^^. '24.13.1^98, wsvwd^'^^^^^^ Gtmenuiie^ofMadliyaRaflest^ aUowmgtiroiiicrements tn'(lieteacfaeis'w4 l»yeobtained B.Ed,, M.Ed.,B.T.I. CTammation. Certafii^tes. The dfx;nmeiits are taliBtt on recotd in W. P. No. 5862/2006.:\" :: •'...:.,.':.;„ ' ^ •:• . •: , , •; ,:.: .;. ' : . ^^Peti^S^^aW6Sl'2i^, rif^ beiagdisposed<tfby'this<»nuDorioider^fhe&^ oflawJDmalKedui'totUfhe^petitfO^ AGcoiding to feained couDsel^^ tfaePpetitionera, A are cntifled to two advaxiee mcBemeBts in vfew aS'Qus decision 'of this Ctourt in •th€ case of Yashwaat Knmar BIiaradwai Vs. Municii^^©Ggqporatkm.DiMyandaiiofherg2QOK This CSBurt ^ Maa3cip^f3acp0rStw:a,D^y^^ came te» fhe txvscbiwon: ^Q^^^ iKachct^^^^ Geitifeate <^ flieir oiffn. »gaa»ses,are ^ 'by tte cnicudtar dated 24.12,% (Aanexurc P/7) issiud t>y the Sfate Govwament of Matihjret PEEulcsh. Fiu-fher mthematfercrfSint.Manfiiau^ShrisastBWaVs.Stateof M.P. and ottoers { 2000 (l) M.P.fcS.R. 136 l flie BtecUCTa Piadeste State AdmiiustEatnre Tribunql, Qwalior Etenctt, wlule co^idenng ttic eiiGular^^^^d^ Assstant'BBaehers, wfao IIHTO aequued B.Ed, d^ree at fheir onm cost between 23.10.1964 and 7.5.1973 aliaB be eiitttled to ftro adwanc®mcrements, Belted on decision in lihe casefxrf' RHkBsU Kumar Shrisasta^ Vs. State ofMR & 1632/99, decidedtm 1240.IWSwIieremitfaobse^ circular dated 1.3.^1999 caiuiotbe made^applicdMe tetcospecSfety. Thus, a.'tesebia, mj^ ^'ftsa to^ ^ has obtamed B.Ed.degieebefi^ 1.3.1999 is^entifled^^^^^^^^^to^^^ increaieuts. 1 '^SS^^^5:»SS3S^S]S fc x!«.. K^^h ';, -. ,17;-',: 'It:,js:^p<:niM^o^'^ ^.1:faat'iUB^Aj^;S<a(E;o£l4aiiI^i)Riade^ PStitioin^ati^^te^oidj^^^^p^ Supreme|iGcui^ fflri a^anst tt»eonle ^ ^ireGlaMl to. Itie eflft^ ffiat fhe^ ci^^ appIicableaEtrospcct^ ^ and.,<]:t6samssh^ ^^:'; :::';.:::::',h^;ob'teua^ sabstantiated l>y «cir^^ present State of ; 'staite^^lK^ fhe decMicaoEfbeSuiMB^ • 8. UaiiiM'counsct fer l^ fllB^&cts afld ques&m pflaw ^mv^^ conered.1^,dce!Kkm^1EUis'Goui^^^^ BhaiadwajVs. MunKapatta}^^ towludillearDied oou^el^appeanii^y^^lte GOtMscdcs aiul agrees 'wiiiU. &e,anreiiiM^lmadc tay leained^x^^ aftSfaav^^^bKyeQ'Ssfiwx^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ::•••, . .^; ,.:, 9. ^ B.T.I./B.Ed, Gertlfieate.lmhtei^^ley^ in tenaM offltoft ordiera,?^ Bh,aiadwaj Vs. Muiuca^^^^O^ anOdier (Sain^, i <:^ siia;>jcctto^erifitcatu^«tf& acqunect I3.]Ed. Gertjfiea^ GunmIarsdStied^ iMve^'bcen paid^t^ad'ra^ •'coste. . , - : ''•, : ::- ", . s ::'1 ;;::', • ? ' '. . : "• .' • - ; '. 10. ,Acopyc]ffhisbrdert>e^aiC^bn^ » Thakur SdA Satish K. Agnihotri Judge /3 f-l:^.!'S'^''fl®^^^^^^^^^S