@ xiNGLE BENCH; w/tmg.“ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BLASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 6 / 20'11 zif/ Kailash Agrawal, PETITIONER 5/0. Lafe Shri Ram'niwas Agrawal, Aged abouT 5O years, Q R/o. Jagafpufh Raigar‘h, DisTf: Departmem‘ of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur‘ (C.G.) . CollecTor, Raigarh, Dish‘. — Raigarh (6.6.) 3/.Sub-Divisional /, Raigarh (C.G.) 4. SuperinTending Engineer, Public Works /Deparfmen’r, Raigarh (C.6.) 5. ExecuTive Engineer, Public Works Officer (Revenue), WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS: As sTaTed in The cause TiTle above. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: % Raigar‘h (C.G.) VERSUS ./ RESPONDENTS S‘rm‘e of Chhatfisgarh, Through, The Secremry, Depar'rmen’r, Raigarh (C.6.) / 6. Direc‘ror, DirecforaTe of Medical Education, Raipur, (C.6.) 4% HIGH COURT OF CHHATT!SGARH : BILASPUR WRET PETWION (C) NO. 5916 OF 2011 (Wrh Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of tndia) Séngte 3ench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present :- Shri Shashank Thakur‘ Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S,Murthy, Dy. Advocate General for the State. ORDER (Passed on this 30‘" day of September, 201 1) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sutnmits that, at this stage, :he getitione? does not want to Dress the relief clause 10.1. However. since the Collector, Raigarh. has not considered the representation of the petitioner dated 8/9220“ (Annexure P-1G) till date and are proceeding to initiate action for acquiring the land in dispute, thus, the Collector may be directed to consider his representation and take a decision before the acquisition proceeding is initiated. Jl\ respondents submits that there is no probiem to consider the representation of the petitioner and the Collector wiii take decision as eariy as possible within a period of four weeks before initiating the process of land acquisition. 3. in view of the above, according to learned counsei appearing tor the petitioner, nothing survives tor adjudication in this matter. 4. Accordingiy, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforestated observation. Sd/— SATISH K. ANGNH‘IOTRI Judge Shri Murthy, learned Dy. Advoeate Generai appearing for the State! PETH‘IONER Kai¥ash Agrawai Versus RESPONDENTS Staie of Chhatiisgarh & Others