// 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.6705/2008 Dr. Sriniwas S/o Shri Radhey Shyam Versus Rajesh Kumar S/o Rang Bihari Lal and Another Date of Order ::: 29.07.2008 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Tripurari Sharma, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition, on behalf of the defendant, is directed against the impugned order dated 24th May, 2008, whereby his application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment in the written-statement, during the pendency of the first appeal, has been dismissed. A suit for eviction was filed against the petitioner, which was decreed by the trial court. Being aggrieved with the same, an appeal was preferred by the petitioner and during the pendency of that appeal, the present application was filed. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner in the light of reasons assigned by the trial court and, // 2 // after considering the same, I am satisfied that the reasons assigned by the trial court for rejecting the application are perfectly justified and no interference in the said order is called for by this court under Article 227 of the Constitution. I do not find any illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error in the impugned order which calls for any interference by this Court. There is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//