: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1001 OF 2008 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1001 OF 2008 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1001 OF 2008 IN IN IN SUIT NO.1461 OF 1992 SUIT NO.1461 OF 1992 SUIT NO.1461 OF 1992 Travor Joseph Harald D’Sylva & Anr. .. Plaintiffs. Versus A.A.Farms & Ors. .. Defendants. And 1.Tirupathi Balaji Enterprises 2.Mr.Sanjay M.Punamia .. Respondents. Mr.Birendra Saraf, Mr.Ajay Fernandes and Mr.Mohan G.Salian i/b.Gagrats for the plaintiffs. Ms.Shika Raniwala i/b.L.C.Tolat & Co. for defendant No.3. Mr.Sanjay Jain for respondents. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATE : 2nd September, 2008. DATE : 2nd September, 2008. DATE : 2nd September, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- 1. This chamber summons is taken out to amend the : 2 : plaint on the strength of developments which have taken place since after the filing of the suit and on the basis of new information which was divulged to the plaintiffs after plaintiffs took out chamber summons No.641 of 2008. 2. It is seen that in the beginning, plaintiffs had taken out chamber summons No.641 of 2008 for the purposes of joining respondents as party defendants. During the pendency of that chamber summons, the plaintiffs learnt many more factual aspects which necessitated plaintiffs to take out this chamber summons. 3. I have heard learned Advocates on all the sides. 4. The chamber summons is taken out for joining respondents as party defendants and to add certain other averments in view of the respective stands taken by defendants as well as respondents. In my view to resolve the controversy between the parties, amendment to the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 can be granted and for that reason, I am inclined to allow the chamber summons. Hence the order :- O R D E R O R D E R O R D E R : 3 : i) Chamber Summons No.1001 of 2008 is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (d). ii) Plaintiffs to carry out amendment to the plaint on or before 12.9.2008. Plaintiffs to serve copy of the amended plaint to the Advocate for the defendants and Advocate for newly added respondents on or before 18.9.2008. 5. The Defendants as well as newly added respondents make a statement before this court through their Advocates that the status-quo as of 30.4.2008 shall continue till 26.9.2008. Plaintiffs to take out fresh notice of motion and apply for appropriate interim reliefs on merits of the case and in no case, this order of continuation of status-quo shall inure to the benefit of the plaintiffs. 6. Notice of motion is made absolute in the above terms. There shall be no order as to costs. (R.Y. GANOO,J.) (R.Y. GANOO,J.) (R.Y. GANOO,J.)