IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH MAY 2010 / 29TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 15255 of 2010(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- A.E.SANKARAN NAMBOODIRI,KIZHAKKE ILLAM KANNAVAM POST,VIA CHITTARIPARAMBU,EDAYAR,KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO REVENUE,GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,TRIVANDRUM. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR,KANNUR. 3. TAHSILDAR,TALUK OFFICE,THALASSERY. 4. VILLAGE OFFICER,KOLAYAD VILLAGE, THALASSERY TALUK,KANNUR DISTRICT. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 15255 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 19th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T In the course of consideration of Ext.P1 application for assignment of certain properties, as directed by this Court in Ext.P2 judgment in W.P.(C).No.19098/2009, the petitioner found that the survey number mentioned in Ext.P1 is wrong. Therefore, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P3 application for correction of the same. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the same before considering Ext.P1. 2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. 3. In the facts circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P3 before considering Ext.P1 application as directed in Ext.P2 judgment. Consequently, the time fixed for consideration of Ext.P1 would stand extended by two months. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2