-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2759 OF 2005 Mohamed Samuel Siddique and Anr. ..Applicants Vs. Arun Walunj and Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr. Swarup Tawade i/b Racheeta Dhuru Advocate for Applicants Mr. D.P.Adsule, A.P.P. for the State ... CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM: SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : JUNE 24,2005 DATE : JUNE 24,2005 DATE : JUNE 24,2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking quashing of proceedings relating to Chapter Case Nos. 40 to 44 of 2005. The said proceedings have been initiated against them by respondent no.1 i.e. S.E.M. and A.C.P. D.N.Nagar, Andheri (W),Mumbai. -2- 3. In the said case, it is seen that only show cause notice has been issued to the applicant. In my view, it would be appropriate that the applicant replies to the said show cause notice and at this stage, I am not inclined to quash the proceedings. In case the proceedings are decided against the applicants, the applicants shall be given four days time to furnish the requisite bond or sureties. 4. Application is disposed of. 5. Authenticated copy be issued to the parties. [V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]