IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19263 of 2011 KARI SAHAB @ MANSUR ALAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner, Kari Sahab @ Nansur Alam in Guraru P.S. Case No. 56 of 2009 for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence. During investigation it has come to light that the petitioner was only standing near the place of occurrence and he has no weapon in his hand. Learned counsel for the State submits that the accused including the petitioner has tied the deceased Ranjan Kumar, who was called by some unknown persons in the night. It is further submitted by the State that the deceased was tied and assaulted with Lathi and dagger. The injury caused by the accused persons including petitioner has caused the death of the deceased. Learned counsel for the 2 State further submits that investigation is still continuing. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, in my opinion the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Bhardwaj (Amaresh Kumar Lal,J.)