IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10790 of 2008 Kanhaiya Mishra, Son of Late Vishnudeo Mishra, Resident of village Hariharpur, P.O. & P.S. Vijaipur, District Gopalganj (Bihar)……Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Education Commissioner – cum - Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Primary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Inspector of School-cum-Deputy Director of Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Saran Division, Saran at Chapra. 6. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Gopalganj, District Gopalganj. 7. The District Education Officer, Gopalganj, District Gopalganj. 8. The District Superintendent of Education, Gopalganj, District Gopalganj. 9. The Block Development Officer, Bhore, Block & P.S. Bhore, District Gopalganj. 10. The Block Education Extension Officer, Bhore, Block & P.S. Bhore, District Gopalganj. 11. The Block Education Extension Officer, Bijaipur, Block & P.S. Bijaipur, District Gopalganj. 12. The Head Master, Gvernment Middle School, Gaitpur, Rudrapur, Bhore, Block & P.S. Bhore, District Gopalganj. 13. The District Account Officer, Gopalganj, District Gopalganj. 14. The District Treasury Officer, Gopalganj, District Gopalganj. 15. The Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 16. The Accountant General (A & E), Bihar………………………………………………………………………...Respondents ------------- For Petitioner: Mr. Nityanand Mishra, Advocate For the State: Mr. A.C. to G.P. 21 For Accountant General: Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate. 2 19.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for 2 the respondents. Petitioner has superannuated with effect from 31.01.1999. He has filed this writ application in 2008 for grant of trained scale of pay with effect from 1984 and for revision of his pension etc. on that basis. Apparently, this claim of petitioner suffers from gross delay and laches. However, from Anenxure-2 it appears that the increment of the petitioner has been sanctioned by the respondents as late as on 22.12.2005. As such, this Court directs the respondents to pay all the monetary benefits on account of grant of increments to the petitioner, as may be admissible to him, positively within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)