IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.235 of 2007 ==================================================== RAM CHARITRA PODDAR, SON OF LATE BINDESHWARI PODDAR, AT PRESENT RESIDING AT VILLAGE- POKHARIA, P.S. BEGUSARAI, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI :--PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COMMISSIONER, MUNGER DIVISION, MUNGER. 3. THE COLLECTOR, BEGUSARAI. 4. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, SAHEBPUR KAMAL BLOCK, P.S. SAHEBPUR KAMAL, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI. 5. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MATIHANI BLOCK, P.S. MATIHANI, DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI :--RESPONDENTS. ==================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner: M/S. Sanjay Kumar @ Manu & Ajit Kumar Singh-2, Advocates For the Respondents: Mr. Anil Kumar Verma, A.C. to A.A.G.-13. ==================================================== 2. 11.07.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 21/28.09.2006 passed by the Commissioner, Munger Division, Annexure-7, whereunder the request of the petitioner for payment of full salary for the period during which he remained under dismissal has been rejected holding that as he did not discharge any duties during the said period he is not entitled for salary on the principle of “no work no pay”. In this connection, I may refer to the appellate order dated 4/5.08.1998 passed in Service Appeal No. 5/1997-98, Annexure-4 2 whereunder petitioner has been directed to be reinstated in service on deposit of the defalcated amount of Rs. 5180/-. In compliance of the aforesaid order petitioner also deposited the defalcated amount. 3. From perusal of the appellate order dated 04/05.8.1998, Annexure-4 it is quite clear that petitioner has not been exonerated of the charge. In the circumstances, he is not entitled for any salary for the period during which he remained under dismissal. I do not find any merit in the writ petition, which is dismissed. P.K.P. ( V. N. Sinha, J.)