(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2097 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2097 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2097 OF 2005 Shri. H.K. Jain & Ors ...Applicants Versus Chandrakant Udaychand Mehta & Anr ...Respondents ..... Mr. R.J. Singh, Advocate for Applicants Mr. M.S. Mohite, Advv. for Respondent No.1. Mr. Y.S. Shinde, A.P.P. for State. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATED: 18TH JULY, 2005 DATED: 18TH JULY, 2005 DATED: 18TH JULY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard the learned advocate for the applicants, the learned advocate for the respondent-original complainant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. By order dated 14.6.2005 this application was disposed of. However, there are some typographical mistakes in the first sentence of para 2 of the said order. Hence, the said sentence is modified and now shall read as under:- "2. The applicants have prayed for quashing of process issued against them in Criminal Case No.590 of 2004 which is pending in the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 43rd Court at Borivali, Mumbai." (-2-) 3. The order dated 14.6.2005 stands modified accordingly. 4. The learned advocate for the applicants states that the necessary revision would be preferred within a period of three weeks from today. In view of this statement, the proceedings before the trial Court are stayed for a period of three weeks from today. *****