Civil Writ Petition No. 13076 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 13076 of 2010 Date of decision: February 3, 2011 Surender Singh & others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Rajbir Sehrawat, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana for the State. Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 & 3.. **** RANJIT SINGH J. The petitioners are the persons whose land has been acquired by the Government for setting up of water works by the HUDA. The petitioners have, accordingly, filed this writ petition for allotment of the plots in the next developing sectors i.e. 5 & 6, Rohtak in the oustees quota as per the policy framed by the Government. In the reply filed, the claim of the petitioners has been resisted on the ground that their land has been acquired in the year 2008 and policy of 2007 may be applicable to them, but first the claim of oustees for Sector 5 & 6 has to be considered. Counsel appearing for HUDA, however, submits that the claim of the petitioners would be considered in the next sector as per the policy. Civil Writ Petition No. 13076 of 2010 -2- This approach may not sound fair. Let the claim of the petitioners be considered for allotment in Sector 5 & 6, if any plot is left after considering the claim of all eligible persons in oustees quota. The claim of the petitioners can not be ignored if the plots are available. If no plot is available, then the claim of the petitioners may be considered in some other sector in terms of the policy. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. February 3, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE