^^-•4 ^ v^ /ff IGH COURT OF AT Writ Petition No. 2147 Petitioners :•< "y Vsrsus ResDondents Anthonv Lakra S/o Carlus Aaed about >4 yrs, Assistant Teacher Syivanus Ekka S/o Suleman Aged about 40 yrs, Assistant Teacher Bonlfas Minj S/o Mareel Aged sbout 5t years, Assistant Teacher Juei Xalxo S/o Joseph Aged about 5i yrs, Assistant Teacher Sylvanus Toppo Slo Camil Aged about 49 yrs, Assistant Teacher Ku. Marry Sosan 3eck D/o Anthony a.aed about 37 yrs, Assistant Teacher Ku. Rahila Tirkey D/o Gabriet Aged sbout 32 vrs. Assistsnt Tsschsr Ali are 'A'orkina s.t & Address ars :- Sahavika Mlddie Schooi Jokbahaia (Boys) Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Throuah the Secretary, Department of Schooi Education, Mantraiay, D.K.S. Bhawan, Ralpur (C.G.) The Director. Directoratss of Pubiic Instruction, Pension Bada Raiour (C.G.) The District Educatlon Officer sub!ic instructions Jashpur (C.G.) The Chairman / Manager, Sahayika Middie Schooi (Boys) Jokbahala, Christian Peoples Committee Jokbahaia Distt. Jashpui r^. '^ -^ \ C^.'^.) 'S s'f^fil &<? Mr. N. Malviya, counsel for the petitionsrs. Ms. Deepaii Pandey, Panel iawyer for the responds (Passed on this 12 day ofApril, 2007) The auestion of law involved herein is whether the non-teaching staf? workina in Government aided schoo! are entitled to the benefit of recornmendations of the Fifth Pay Commission under the provisions of the Madhva Pradesh Ashaskiva Sikshan Sanstha (Ad-hyapakon Tatha Anya Karmchariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandava) Adhinivam.-1978 i'henceforSh 'the ^Ji' Adhiniyam, 1978') and the ruies made'thereunder read with the Madhva Pradesh Revision of Pay Ruies, 1988 (henceforth 'the Pay Ruies, 1988'). 2. The identieal question of !aw was considered by this Court in batch of mattsrs i.e. Smt A. Lai'! vs. Stats of Chhattisgarh and other connected matters pA'.P. No. 4108 of 2005) and by judgment and order dated 6.2.2007, this Court held that the Detitioners who are working in fuiiv Govemrnent aided Drivate schoois are entitisd to the revised oav-scales with efect from 1.1 .1996 as Drescribed under ths Pay Ruies, 1988. This Court further for the ourpose of payment of arrears had granted certain direction. 3., Admsttedly and jointiy, it is submitted by the parties that thls matter is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed by this Court in the case of Smt. A. Lal! vs. State of Chhattisaarh and other connscted matters (Suoi'a'). 4. As a resurt, for the reasons sfated in the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed in W.P. No. 4108 of 2005 (Smfc A. Laii vs. State of Chhattisaarh and other connected matters) fSUDra). The writ oetition is aiiowed in th®same terrns and conditions. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge