1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1088/2009. (Bapurao Dagdu Chavan @ Gavare and Anr. Vs. Shankar Pralhad Chavan and Anr.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.SI Nandode, Adv. for Petitioners; Mr.PD Suryawanshi, Adv. h/for Mr. KJ Suryawanshi, Adv. for Respondents. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL ,J. DATE : 27 th September, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) The grant of proposed amendment, sought for by the plaintiffs, as regards addition of boundaries of the disputed portion, after recording of evidence is questioned by the defendants. 3) Though I quite see in the plaint paragraph 1 the plaintiff initially excluded to refer the four boundaries of the disputed portion, however, situation warranted to do so, seeking amendment, which the learned Judge accordingly allowed. 4) Needless to indicate, by virtue of the amendment in the plaint, the right accrued to the defendants, to controvert the same or to challenge the same, is 2 not curtailed and taken away. They can resort to the same by appropriate stand/defence, as permissible under law. 5) The petition lacks merit, dismissed. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/