IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.312 of 2011 MD. RAISH ALAM @ Raish Alam, S/o Shahban Miyan. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 18.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 22 of N.D.P.S. Act. The petitioner was allowed bail by order dated 15.04.2010 but on condition that an affidavit would be filed on his behalf that he is not an accused in any other case. The petitioner was accused in one other case but as per paragraph 8 not of similar nature. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail deleting the said condition on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Rail P.S. Case No. 06 of 2010 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the brother of the petitioner namely Khalil Alam. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the 2 bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)