IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 9TH OCTOBER 2007 / 17TH ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 28225 of 2007(I) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------------- T.K.SASI, CHIEF ENGINEER (UNDER SUSPENSION), RESIDING AT KOWDIAR GARDENS-B, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR RESPONDENTS: ----------------------------- 1. THEKKUMBHAGOM REGHUNATH, KULANGARA NIVAS, VADAKKUMBHAGOM, CHAVARA SOUTH, KOLLAM. 2. KERALA LOK AYUKTA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, LEGISLATURE COMPLEX, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-33. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTICORRUPTION BUREAU, SPECIAL INVESTIGATION UNIT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N. SUKUMARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/10/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss ANTONY DOMINIC,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 28225 of 2007 -------------------------- Dated this the 9th October, 2007 J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed challenging Exhibits P8 and P10 orders passed by the 2nd respondent. Complaint is that by these orders the 2nd respondent is interfering with the vigilance enquiry that is going on against the petitioner. 2. Today, Learned Government Pleader on instruction submits that the subject matter of the enquiry that is already going on against the petitioner and the subject matter of Exhibits P8 and P10 orders are different. 3. It is submitted that pursuant to Exhibits-P8 and P10 enquiry has been conducted and it has been disclosed that there is no prima facie case for proceeding against the petitioner. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is closed. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) ma K.THANKAPPAN,J CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999 ORDER 25th May, 2007