IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6459 of 2009 MD. SAHIM, son of Md. Hamid Ansari, resident of village Jatipur, Tola Gijas Math Tolla, Police Station- Saraiya, District Muzaffarpur Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Manjeeda Khatoon wife of Md. Sahim, daughter of Anwar Hussain, resident of village Jaitpur Basara, P.S. Saraiya, District Muzaffarpur ----------- 02/ 23.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the complainant. Petitioner- husband is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Sections 498(A), 323, 379 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that forgetting the past, he is ready and willing to continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant, Manjeeda Khatoon, opposite party no.2 and shall file written undertaking on affidavit to that effect in the court below within four weeks from today. Once the aforesaid undertaking on affidavit is filed, petitioner, Md. Sahim be admitted to the privilege of provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Rs. Five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M. (East), Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 1201 of 2008, subject to the conditions, as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Having obtained the provisional bail within one week of such grant, 2 petitioner should approach the complainant at her parental home and thereafter should appear in the court below along with the complainant in the next week and if the court below is satisfied that the matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the complainant has been resolved, they are residing together at the matrimonial home of the complainant, then the court below shall monitor the case for sometime, until the court below is satisfied that the matrimonial peace prevails between the parties and thereafter the provisional bail allowed to the petitioner be confirmed. It is made clear that if the petitioner does not maintain the time schedule indicated in this order, then the provisional bail allowed to him be cancelled. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioner. Arjun/ ( V.N. Sinha, J.)