IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2011 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32430 of 2011(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SHEEBA.A,CHALAKKALAM,TATTAMANGALAM, CHITTUR ,PALAKKAD 678 102. BY ADV. SRI.V.MADHUSUDHANAN SRI.T.ISSAC RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR,CALICUT 673 636. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT 673 636. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.32430/11 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 30/11/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN DATED 28/11/2011 //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 32430 OF 2011 ===================== Dated this the 7th day of December, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner was a B.Tech student. When the result of the 5th Semester examination was declared, she had failed in one paper viz., “Linear Integrated Circuits”. She applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 8 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the University for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PA to Judge