IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 23RD JULY 2007 / 1ST SRAVANA 1929 Cont.Case(C).No.1094 of 2007(S) ------------------------------------------------------------------ ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).11008/2007 DATED 25/05/2007 .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C):- ---------------------------------------------------- M.K.KUMUDHAM, W/O.V.ASHOK KUMAR, AGED 56, ASHOK BHAVAN, P.O.PUTHIYANGADI, PAVANGAD, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. SMT.T.RESMI DAMODARAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 3 TO 5 IN WP(C):- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. RAMDAS POTHEN, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL), KOZHIKODE. 2. SIRAJ, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NADAKKAVU POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE. 3. ABDUL KAREEM, (FATHER'S NAME & AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ELATHUR POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE. BY SPECIAL GOVT. PLEADER MR.C.T.RAVIKUMAR THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- H.L.Dattu,C.J. & K.T.Sankaran,J. ------------------------------------------------- Cont.Case (C).No.1094 of 2007-S ------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 23rd day of July, 2007 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu,C.J. Alleging that the respondents have committed an act of contempt by disobeying the orders and directions issued by this Court in W.P.(C). No.11008 of 2007 dated 25th May, 2007, the petitioner/complainant is before us in this contempt petition with a request to initiate appropriate proceedings against the respondents for the so-called disobedience of the orders and directions issued by this Court. (2) Having gone through the pleadings made in the contempt petition and also the orders passed by the Division Bench of this Court, we are of the opinion, the respondents have not committed any act of contempt, which warrants initiation of contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act. Therefore, the contempt petition requires to be rejected and it is rejected. Ordered accordingly. H.L.Dattu Chief Justice K.T.Sankaran Judge vku/-