IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5207 of 2010 RAMASHISH PANDIT, Son of Late Babulal Pandit, resident of village-Rarha, P.S. Hazrat Sain, P.s. Dharuba, District-Patna, presently resident of C/O Rajendra Singh, Ashin Electrical Service Centra, Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Kankarbagh Road, P.S. Kankarbagh, District- Patna --------Petitioner Versus 1. The Commissioner,Regional Provident Fund, Bihar, Employees Provident Fund Organisation 2. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Bihar, Employees Provident Fund Organisation,Patna 3. The Managing Director, Bihar State Small Industries Corporation,Patna ------- Respondents ----------- 05 10-12-2010 Heard Sri Rajendra Kumar Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Uma Kant Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.3 i.e. Bihar State Small Industries Corporation and Sri R.S. Pradhan , learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent nos.1 and 2. The petitioner had initially prayed for quashing the order dated 5.04.2006, whereby the representation of the petitioner filed for re-fixation of pension of the petitioner was rejected, vide Annexure-3 to the petition. In the present case, a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of Respondent no.3 and in paragraph-8 of the counter affidavit , the stand has been taken as follows: “8. That so far employee share is concerned, it is respectfully submitted that the share of employer was also remitted to Respondent no.2 Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Patna vide Cheque No.720307 dt.10m7.2008 of the S.B.I. Patna for Rs.3,68,454/- with a request to deposit it in the account of each and every employee of this Corporation as per their share mentioned in Form 3A ( R) vide letter No.130/09 dt.24.2.2009 which was duly accepted by the office of Respondent no.1 and 2. It is also submitted that from 3A® were also sent to the said office for each and every employees of the Corporation in which petitioner’s form had also been included.” It was submitted by Sri R.S. Pradhan, learned counsel for Respondent nos. 1 and 2 that in view of the stand taken by Respondent no.3 immediate step will be taken for re- fixation of the pension of the petitioner in the light of the recommendation/contribution sent by Respondent no.3. In view of the subsequent development taken in the present case after filing of the writ petition, the present writ petition is being disposed of with consent of the parties with direction to the Respondent no.1 to act as per the recommendation/contribution sent by Respondent no.3 and re- fix the pension of the petitioner in accordance with law, which is to be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. It is made clear that the petitioner will be entitled to get all admissible dues including the interest, if it is admissible. With the above observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)