IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO. 2257 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO. 2257 OF 2008 CRI.APPLICATION NO. 2257 OF 2008 Manoj Jagmohandas Shah, Applicant. Vs The State of Maharashtra, Respondent. Mr M.K.Kocharekar, i/b Rajeev Sawant, for the applicant. Mr J.P.Yagnik, APP, for the State. Mr G.Ramchandran, original complainant present. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 16/10/2008 DATE : 16/10/2008 DATE : 16/10/2008 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard Mr.Kocharekar, learned counsel for the applicant, complainant-in-person and Mr Yagnik, learned APP, for the State. 2. The applicant has prayed for anticipatory bail in C.R.No.332 of 2007 of Kandivali Police Station, Mumbai. The said crime has been registered against the applicant for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 465, 468, 471 and 420 of IPC. 3. It appears that the Sessions Court, by reasoned order dated 4.6.2008, has continued the interim protection only till 30.6.2008 and disposed of the application. From the tenor of the reasons recorded by the learned Sessions Judge, it is clear that he was inclined to grant the anticipatory bail, as prayed by the applicant, however, he simply continued the interim order till 30.6.2008. Since 29.4.2008 till this date the interim protection is operating. Learned APP, on instructions, from the Investigating Officer who is present in the Court, submits that the investigation is almost complete and the police will be filing chargesheet within two-four weeks. Keeping that in view, the learned counsel for the applicant and the original complainant-in-person, so also the learned APP have agreed for disposal of this application in the following term and have fairly stated that I need not record reasons for the same. Hence, I pass the following order. 4. The interim protection, granted by the Sessions Court till 30.6.2008 and which was continued from time to time by this Court, shall remain operative till filing of the chargesheet. The applicant shall have a liberty to apply for regular bail before the appropriate court within one week from the date of filing of the chargesheet and the concerned Court shall decide the said application on merits in accordance with law. The interim protection shall remain operative till the disposal of the application. . It is needless to express that the applicant shall report to the concerned police station as and when called. The complainant shall also cooperate with the investigating agency by producing documents as demanded by them during investigation. With these observations, the application is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)