{1} DB CW Petition(Parole) 5781/2010 Tikam Chand @ Tinchu Vs State IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR O R D E R D.B. Civil Writ Petition(Parole) No. 5781/2010 Tikam Chand @ Tinchu Versus State of Rajasthan & Others. DATE OF ORDER: 26.07.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENA V. GOMBER Mr. Lakhan Singh Tomar, for the petitioner. Mr. J.R. Bijarnia, Public Prosecutor, for the respondents. **** Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has preferred this parole writ petition for grant of first parole of 20 days under Rule 9 of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958. Notice to show cause was issued to the respondents and in response thereto, reply to the parole writ petition has been filed. From impugned order dated 02.03.2010, it appears that District Parole Advisory Committee, Ajmer rejected the application of the petitioner on the ground that mother of the petitioner is changing her house again and again, therefore, District Welfare {2} DB CW Petition(Parole) 5781/2010 Tikam Chand @ Tinchu Vs State Officer as well as Superintendent of Police both have not recommended the case of the petitioner for grant of parole. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that change in address of the petitioner was due to change of rented house by his mother. Now, she has already taken another house, therefore, there will be no variance in the address of the petitioner. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any illegality in the impugned order dated 02.03.2010 passed by the District Parole Advisory Committee, Ajmer. The parole writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. However, a liberty is granted to the petitioner to file fresh parole application and the respondents are directed to consider the same on merits. (MEENA V. GOMBER),J. (NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J. Manoj Item No. 29.