IN THE HléGH COURT QF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGA‘Q' w.P. No. 2 SS/ /2ooe PETITIQNER : Vijay Kumar Bhuarya, Aged about 24 yeag's, / S/o. Matte Singh Bhuarya, R/o. Vi‘l‘lage Bhairamgarh; Tahsil Bijapur; District Dantewada (CG) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through; Secretary, Tribal Welfare Deptt., D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Collector; Dantewada, Distt Dakshin Bastar, Dantewada (CG) Director, Panchayat and Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) Chief Executive Officer; Janpad Panchayat, Bhairamgarh, District Dantewada (CG) Block Education Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bhairamgarh, District Dantewada (CG) Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Dantewada, Distric Dantewada (CG) EVRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ' t HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH: BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’ble shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. W. P. No. 1255 OF 2006 Pcu'tioner : Vijay Kumar Bhualya Versus Respondents ; State of Chhattisgarh 65 Others. Shri Manoj Paranjpe, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sunil Otwam', panel lawyer for tho respondents. ORAL ORDER (25th March, 2006) 1; This pctiiion challenges the impugned order dated 30.11.2005, (Annexure P-Q), passed by the respondent No.5, whereby the OECer Incharge of Primary School‘ Keshamundi, Block Bhajramgarh, District Dantewada, has been directed that the order dated 20. 10.2005, (Annexure P—S), passed by the Janpad Panchayat, Bhairamgarh, appointing Shiksha Karmi, Grade—III, be not given en‘ect to Without permission of District Collector, Dantewada. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was duly selected and appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, Vide order dated 20.10.2005 (Annexure P— 5), passed by the respondent No.6. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted the joining report on 5. 12.2005, (Annexure P—8). Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioner had joined the duties on 5. 12.2005, itself. 3. The petitioner was informed that the entire selection process appointing Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, has been cancelled. It is further contended that the petitioner has not received any written information as yet about cancellation of the selection proceedings, or his appointment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1, 2 and 3, submits that the petitioner has never joined pursuant to his selection and appointment as Shiksha Kalmi, Grade-III, as the Annexure P-8 is the application made by the petitioner to the Chief Executive Onicer, Janpad Panchayat, Bhairamgarh, for his joining. It was further submitted that since the enh'xe selection proceedings have been quashed and new selection process has heen initiated, the petitioner does not have any right to the appointment. 5. Be that as it may, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made a representation, (Annexure P- 11 and P— 12) to the Secretary Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Backward Classes, Welfare Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, therefore, the respondents w may be directed to decide the said representation within a stipulated period, 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P-11 and P—12), in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks, from the date of receipt/pmduch'bn of copy of this order. 7. In view of foregoing, this petin'on stands disposed of No order as to costs. motrl i Satish Ko Ag“ /,..‘»Ab‘ H S — Judge / \ ‘x