cp220.10 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.220 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.958 OF 2009 ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Mr.Parag Shahane, Adv. for petitioner. Mr.K.B. Chaudhari, Adv. For R.Nos.2 and 3. Mr.D.R. Kale, A.G.P. for State. CORAM: S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 15.06.2011. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2 Perused the contents of the affidavit in reply filed by the respondents no.2 and 3. It is not in dispute that the order, of which disobedience has been alleged in this contempt cp220.10 2 petition, has been complied with by respondents No.2 and 3. It is true that there is considerable delay in complying with the order. However, respondents No.2 and 3, in their affidavit in reply, have tendered apology for the same and stated that the said delay was not intentional. 3 Therefore, taking overall of the matter, I do not think that there is any willful disobedience of the order of this Court. Hence, the contempt petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) PLK/*