IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL C-482 No. 193 of 2008 Deepak Chanyal - Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & another. - Respondents. Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, G.A. for respondent No. 1 to 2. Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. The learned counsel for the parties submit that this petition can be disposed of by directing the learned court below to dispose of the pending criminal revision expeditiously. Based upon the aforesaid agreement, this petition is disposed of accordingly. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st F.T.C. Haldwani is directed to dispose of Criminal Revision No.13 of 2008. pending in his Court latest by or before 30th May, 2008. He shall take all possible steps to ensure that the revision petition indeed is disposed of before the aforesaid date. The parties through their counsel are directed to appear before the revisional court on 08th May, 2008. Until the revision petition is disposed of the interim order dated 24th March, 2008, passed by this Court shall continue. Immediately upon the disposal of the revision petition this order shall cease to operate, to be substituted by any fresh order which might be passed by the revisional court as a consequence of the disposal of the revision petition. It goes without saying that the passing of the aforesaid interim order by this Court shall not be constituted as an expression of opinion by this Court with respect to the merits of the case. The learned revisional court shall dispose of the revision petition uninfluenced by passing of the aforesaid order on its merits and strictly in accordance with law. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 29.04.2008 JPT