IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.696 OF 2010 DATED:28.9.2010 Between: Ch. Pramodh … Appellant And The Assistant Divisional Engineer APSPDCL Distribution – 1, Vijayawada, Krishna District … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.696 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Nisar Ahmad Kakru) The appellant, Chartered Accountant by profession, questioned the demand notice before the Writ Court contending that the respondent could not categorize his house and office as a non-domestic premises because entire building is not being used as such. Dealing with the contention, the learned single Judge left it open to the appellant – petitioner to explain his position in respect of use of the house and declared him entitled to pay the electricity charges at domestic rate to the extent of the area which is used for residential purposes and for rest of the building used for the office of the Chartered Accountancy, the learned single Judge upheld the demand notice. In our opinion, there could be no better order. Situated thus, interference is declined. Regarding grievance urged before us by learned counsel for the appellant on account of alleged disconnection of the electricity because of failure of the appellant to satisfy the demand, suffice it to say claim of the appellant shall be settled as per the mandate of the judgment of the learned single Judge and to safeguard his interests, it is provided that the respondent shall consider the representation of the appellant, in compliance with the judgment of the learned single Judge within fifteen days to be reckoned from the date it is presented before the competent authority and upon consideration of the representation, the appellant, if found entitled to reimbursement because of use of certain area for domestic purposes, it shall have to be adjusted against future demands of the department, qua the consumption. Disposed of. VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ 28-9-2010 B. Narsinga Rao