IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6399 of 2010 FATMA KHATOON, Wife of Dr. Md. Mashiuizzana, resident of Village- Mahua Mukundpur (Pahar tola) P.S. + P.S.- Mahua, Dist.- Vaishali :--- Petitioner. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur. 3. Circle Officer, Mahua, Dist.- Vaishali. 4. Md. Mustaqua. 5. Md. Murtafa 6. Md. Murtuza. 7. Md. Dahaur. All sons of Late Md. Gaphoor, R/o- Vill- Mahua, Mukundpur, P.O.+P.S.- Mahua, Dist.- Vaishali :--- Respondents. ----------- 2. 15.04.2010. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner is the raiyat in possession of the lands in-question bearing Plot No. 659 appertaining to Khata No. 445, as is evident from the continuous Khatiyan, Annexure-1 and the Register of Land published by the Consolidation Officer but ignoring such fact Opposite Party Nos. 4 to 7 who are not in possession of the lands in-question have been given purcha in respect thereof to the extent of 6 decimals under the Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act vide Basgit Purcha Case No. 150/69-70. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that neither her father nor she was ever given any notice about the aforesaid Basgit Purcha Case No. 150/69-70. 4. Let the petitioner Challenge the Purcha and the orders passed in the aforesaid Basgit Purcha Case No. 150/69-70 by filing appeal before the Collector of the district under the provisions of the Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act. Any limitation which has set in shall be condoned provided the appeal is filed by the petitioner within one month from today after notice to purcha holder. 5. The writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)