IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Rev. (T) No. 106 of 2008. Decided on: 29th October, 2010. Ms. Santosh Chauhan. ….Petitioner. -Versus- Chief Executive Officer and another. .…Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. J.R. Thakur, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 29, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?