IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-23414 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: August 16, 2011 Renu & another .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others .....RESPONDENT(S) . . . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: - Mr. S.P. Soi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. None for respondent Nos.4 to 9. . . . AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that after issuance of notice by this Court, respondent Nos.4 to 9 have desisted from giving any threat to the petitioners who got married. 2. I have taken note of the fact that petitioner No.1 is physically challenged and yet petitioner No.2 has accepted her as his wife. In view of the fact that no eminent danger, at this stage, has been shown, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the Crl. Misc. No. M-23414 of 2011 [2] petitioners to file application before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar, in case there is any perception of threat from respondent Nos.4 to 9. 3. In case, any such application is filed, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Jalandhar, would take immediate steps to ensure that no untoward incident takes place and life and liberty of the petitioners is protected. (AJAI LAMBA) August 16, 2011 JUDGE avin 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?