1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8608 OF 2010 Pradeep s/o Anantrao More .. PETITIONER VERSUS Isaqkhan Ibrahimkhan Pathan & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. A.N. Irpatgire, advocate for the petitioner. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 23 rd SEPTEMBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Petitioner is challenging the interim order passed by the trial court on 13-7-2010 in exercise of powers under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure permitting impleadment of defendant nos. 3 and 4 as plaintiffs. Neither the concerned plaintiffs nor the defendants who are sought to be impleaded as plaintiffs have any objection. However, objection is being raised by original defendant nos. 1 and 2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, objection raised by defendant nos. 1 and 2 need not be entertained. Concerned defendants may have liberty to seek suitable amendment in the written statement already presented and the trial 2 court may consider such request, if made. In exercise of powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, no interference is called for in the instant petition. Petition stands rejected. 2 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp8608.10.odt