1 s2701-07.sxw pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Suit No.2701 of 2007 Bhartu Estates Pvt. Ltd. .. Plaintiffs v/s. Mrs. Jehanara Acidwala & Ors. ..Defendants Ms.Prachhi Tatke for the Plaintiffs. Mr.Rupesh Turbhekar for the Defendant No.2 (a) Mr.Hiren Shah for Defenant Nos.1, 3 to 5 i/b. Prakash & Co. Mr.Sunil Shah i/b. Sunil & Co. for the defendant no.6 CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 2nd December , 2010 P.C. : 1. Consent terms dated today i.e. 2.12.2010, signed by the Director of the Plaintiff, defendant no.1, C.A. Of defendant No.3A, 4, and Trustee of defendant No. 5, Defendant No.6, the advocate for the plaintiff, advocate for defendant no.1, defendant no.3A and 4 and 5 viz. Ms. Prakash & Company, and by Advocate for the Defendant No.2A and advocate for defendant no.6, are tendered in the court. Learned Advocate for defendant no.2A informs the court that the consent terms are not signed by defendant no.2A as she is out of 2 s2701-07.sxw India, and that he has authority to sign the consent terms on behalf of the defendant no.2A and he prays that decree be passed in terms of the consent terms. 2. Learned Counsels on both sides pray for decree in terms of the consent terms. Counsel for the plaintiffs state that suit be allowed to be withdrawn as against defendant no.7 as per clause 16 of the consent terms. 3. Consent terms, as above, are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. 4. There shall be a decree in terms of the consent terms dated 2.12.2010. There shall be no order as to costs. Refund of court fees is granted as per rules. 5. Undertakings mentioned in the consent terms, if any, are accepted. Notice of Motion No.3660 of 2007 is allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs in view of decree in the suit. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]