1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6502 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders Shri A.S.Mantri,Adv.for petitioner Shri S.K.Tambe,AGP for State, CORAM : B.R.GAVAI & A.A.SAYED,JJ DATE : 27/09/2010 1] The petitioner challenges order passed by Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal thereby rejecting application filed by the petitioner for restoration of Original Application Nos. 232/06. The application in question was third application for restoration. The earlier 2 applications were already dismissed, however, inspite of that, showing leniency, the learned Tribunal had shown inclination to hear the petitioner on merits of the matter. The learned Tribunal has observed that even inspite of that the petitioner remained absent on 15/2/2006 and 2/7/2008 and 26/3/2008. 2 2] No perversity is noticed to the approach of the learned Tribunal in arriving at a decision. Hence Petition is dismissed. [A.A.SAYED,J.] [B.R.GAVAI,J.] umg/wp6502-10