IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.7419 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.12.2009 Ram Kumar and others .....Petitioners versus Murti Thakur Ji Maharaj .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) This revision petition is directed by the plaintiffs against the order dated 21.10.2009 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Narnaul, whereby their application to produce certified copy of the judgment and decree dated 2.2.1976 as an additional evidence, has been dismissed. The respondent-defendant has already been proceeded against ex-parte before the trial Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the afore- stated certified copy of the judgment and decree could not be produced earlier, as the records are very old and the certified copy was not readily C.R. No.7419 of 2009 (O&M) 2 available. Keeping in view the nature of the additional evidence sought to be produced, I am of the considered view that the petitioners can be permitted to produce the certified copy of the aforesaid judgment and decree which is per-se admissible, as it might help the Court to arrive at a just conclusion. The revision petition is accordingly allowed; the impugned order dated 21.10.2009 is set-aside and the plaintiff-petitioners are permitted to place on record the certified copy of the judgment and decree dated 2.2.1976. The trial Court shall be at liberty to summon the original records to verify the same, if so required. Dasti. 15-12-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE