COCP No.1061 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.O.C.P.No.1061 of 2009 Date of Decision:-5.8.2009 Krishna Devi ...Petitioner Versus D.C.Dhesi and anr. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Mr.Vivek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.M.L.Saggar, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ashok Jindal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana with respondent Nos.1 and 2. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The grievance of the petitioner in this case is that inspite of the fact that the acquisition proceedings qua the land of the petitioner were quashed vide judgment dated 24.10.2008 passed by this Court in CWP No.18225 of 2008 and it was held that the petitioner was liable to refund the amount of compensation received by her alongwith interest, the respondents have refused to accept the same on the ground that they have already challenged the aforesaid judgment by filing an SLP. In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court separate replies have been filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 by way of short affidavit wherein it has been submitted that the petitioner was required to deposit the amount of compensation as received by her alongwith interest at the rate as mentioned in the aforesaid judgment. The respondents have never refused to accept COCP No.1061 of 2009 2 the same and in fact the petitioner has not approached the office of respondent No.1 to deposit the amount. Shri Ashok Jindal, learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana on instructions from D.S.Dhesi-respondent No.1, who is present in Court, states that in case the petitioner approaches the office of respondent No.2 alongwith the requisite amount as per the order passed by this Court in CWP No.18225 of 2008, the same will be accepted by the respondents, subject to the decision of the SLP filed by them against the judgment of this Court passed in the aforesaid CWP. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondents to pay/deposit the amount as per the judgment of this Court. With the aforesaid liberty, this petition is dismissed as not pressed. It is needless to say that on receipt of the aforesaid amount, the respondents shall pass an appropriate order to release/restore the land to the petitioner. 5.8.2009 (Rakesh Kumar Garg) AS Judge