IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12473 of 2005 QUAZI MD.FURQAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 6 04-07-2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the O. P. no.2. Learned counsel submitted that learned Magistrate has allowed arrears of maintenance of two years which is not permissible in law. He submitted that arrear of one year could only be allowed. Learned counsel for the O. P. no.2, on the other hand, submitted that warrant cannot be issued for recovery of arrears beyond the period of one year. It appears from the impugned order that the learned Magistrate has not issued warrant for recovery of arrears. Such being the position- at this stage, this court finds no merit in this application. The same is, accordingly, dismissed. However, petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the order if warrant is issued. BKS/ (M. Saran,J.)