IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15337 of 2009 RINKU RAI @ RINKU KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 6.5.2009 KHAN Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to inadvertence the case number and the party’s name has been wrongly recorded in the order dated 21.1.2009, being Cr.Misc.No.50342 of 2008 (Saguni @ Jai Prakash Ram & anr Vs State of Bihar) in place of Cr.Misc.No.50347 of 2008(Rinku Rai @ Rinku Kumar Vs State of Bihar). He further submits that the aforesaid defect was partly removed by order dated 11.2.2009 passed in Cr.Misc.No.50347 of 2008. In view of the submissions made in this modification application, the same is allowed and the order dated 21.1.2009 be read as having been passed in Cr.Misc.No.50347 of 2008 (Rinku Rai @ Rinku Kumar Vs State of Bihar) and not in Cr.Misc.No.50342 of 2008 (Saguni @ Jai Prakash Ram & anr Vs State of Bihar). Let this order be communicated through fax at the cost of the petitioner to the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.No.2, Patna in G.R.No.416 of 2006, S.T.No.519 of 2007, arising out of Shahpur (Danapur) P.S. Case No.129 of 2006. (S.P.Singh,J)