IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUKE AT BHASFUR M.C.C. N0. ^^ /2006 APPUCANT ^AUKAWAL STKUCTUKK M1LLS (P) LTU. ^Sy^ ^ Conipany Registered under fhe Indian \^y Companies Act, 1956 Factoiy At Uria Industrial Area, Birgaon, Kaipur (CG) Office at Behind Krishna Talkies, Samta Coiony, Kaipur (CU) Through: Uirector Shri Anil Agrawal, S/o, Shri M,L, Agrawai, R/o. Saxnta Colony, Raipur (CG) NON-APPLICANTS: 1] / ^" VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTESGARH, Represented by the Special Secretajy, Ministry of CoTnmerce & Industries, State of Chhattisgarh, Manti-alaya, Raipur (C.G.) ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, INDUSTRIES, Directorate of Industries, Raipur (CGl APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 151 OF C.P.C. FOR RESTORATION ~^- GF M.C.C. NG. 113 / 2GG6* DiSMiSSBD FGR WAKT GF PROSECUTION 2 ;^;: XI-HC-78 3n^r^rf<^i<=h cTSTT^TT^T^RT^ pNNNNl^ Bar^e ^s^ ^NKrt^, ^Tfl^ll<o, f^RT ^l^ldl sb<41<b ^c,C-^^. ^y 2^ 200 3ii^i <4s<«»»(<ic<t^s<^£r) \ ^<rreK;^T3n^r 12.6.2006:- Shri Manoj Paranj counsel for the applicant. Shri Satish Gupta, Deppty G.A. for the State. Heard. The reason mentioned the MCC is that Shri M Paranjpe, learned counsel for petitjoner, was busy in other C^jurt and an afRdavit of Shri Paran. has been filed in support of MCC, therefore, it is atlow^d. MCC No.119/2006 is directed be restored to its original num and same be listed for hearing. <=M^I<rt41Ti +ii^<nT^te^<fa«i< ^3Tf^R'3TI^T ?e, in ^v. Ihe Ipe Ihe to Der Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge