IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 29TH MAGHA 1929 CRP.No. 628 of 2003(C) AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29/01/2003 IN E.P.NO.311/2002 IN OS.NO.45/99 OF THE COURT OF THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE OF THRISSUR. REVN. PETITIONERS: JUDGEMENT DEBTORS 2,4,5,7,8 1. MUKAMI AMMA, D/O.KURUPPATH MATHU AMMA, VELAPPAYA VILLAGE AND DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 2. MOHANDAS @ MOHANAN, S/O.MUKAMI AMMA, -DO- -DO- 3. MADHUSOODHANAN, S/O.MUKAMI AMMA, -DO- -DO- 4. GEETHI, D/O.MUKAMI AMMA, -DO- -DO- 5. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, S/O.CHAMMANI LAKSHMI AMMA, -DO- -DO- BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENTS: DECREE HOLDER & JUDGEMENT DEBTORS 1, 3 AND 6 1. HILLVALLEY CORPORATION, THIROOR DESOM, KOLAZHY VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. 2. PAVITHRAN, S/O.POCHALIL ACHUTHAN, MULANKUNNATHUKAVU DESOM, KILLANNUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK. 3. RATNAM, D/O.MUKAMI AMMA, VELAPPAYA VILLAGE AND DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK. 4. MURALEEDHARAN, S/O.MUKAMI AMMA, RESIDING -DO- R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.R.KESAVA KAIMAL SRI.N.M.MADHU THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 18/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.M.P.NOS.1555 & 2298/2003 IN C.R.P.NO.628/2003 DISMISSED 18/02/2008 SD/- K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE //TRUE COPY// AHZ/ K.T.SANKARAN, J. -------------------------------------------- C.R.P. NO. 628 OF 2003 C -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th February, 2008 O R D E R The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 29.1.2003, passed by the court below, rejecting the prayer made by the petitioners for stay of execution. It was contended by the petitioners that they had filed an application for setting aside the exparte decree and pending that application, execution proceedings were liable to be stayed. Learned counsel for the first respondent submits that the exparte decree was set aside and thereafter, the executing court has passed an order which is challenged in appeal before this Court as F.A.O.No.166 of 2007. The counsel, therefore, submits that this Revision has become infructuous. There is no representation for the petitioners. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. (K.T.SANKARAN) Judge ahz/ K.T.SANKARAN, J. ------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- C.R.P.NO. 628 OF 2003 C O R D E R 18th February, 2008 -------------------------------------------