HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA A.S.M.P. No. 443 of 2010 in A.S. No. 49 of 2005 And A.S. No. 49 of 2005 DATED: 11.03.2010 Between: V.Venkat Reddy and six others .. Appellants/ Petitioners And V. Sathireddy .. Respondent JUDGMENT:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Eswaraiah) The respondent-plaintiff filed O.S.No. 97 of 1999 on the file of I Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District seeking declaration of title over the suit schedule land and also to restrain the defendants from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same, and the learned I Addl. District Judge, by his judgment dated 28.10.2004, decreed the suit declaring the right, title and possession of the plaintiff over the suit schedule land and also restraining the defendants from interfering with his possession and enjoyment over the suit schedule land. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 28.10.2004, the defendants filed A.S. No.49 of 2005. During pendency of the this appeal, both the parties have filed the present application under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 C.P.C. seeking to record the compromise and dispose of the appeal in terms of the compromise. From a perusal of the record, it is clear that both the parties have compromised the matter, and accordingly, specific terms of compromise have been reduced into writing. Further, both the petitioners-appellants and the respondent-plaintiff are present before this Court and submitted that they have settled all the disputes among themselves in terms of the compromise enclosed with the petition. In view of the compromise effected among the parties, we are of the opinion that the application deserves to be allowed, and the same is accordingly allowed, and consequently, the Appeal Suit is disposed of in term of the compromise, and the Registry is directed to draft a decree in terms of the compromise. No order as to costs. ________________ V. ESWARAIAH, J. 11th March, 2010 ________________ B.N. RAO NALLA, J. bcj