IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.526 of 2007 MAHENDRA PRASAD SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 19.8.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. While this Court would find no flaw in the impugned order enhancing monthly maintenance under section 125 Cr.P.C. from Rs. 225/- to Rs. 1000/- in exercise of power under section 127 Cr.P.C., the plea of the petitioner as being canvassed by his counsel is that he is now aged about 60 years and is confined to bed and there are subsequent development on account of which the petitioner would like to live together with his wife and as such, would not be liable for payment of amount of monthly maintenance so fixed by the court, can always be examined by the court below in an appropriate proceedings in as much as the petitioner always has a liberty to move the court below if he has any genuine reason on account of which he can justify for recall of the order of maintenance. However the aforesaid circumstances cannot be a ground for setting aside the impugned order by the Court in exercise of 2 its limited revisional power. This Court infact does not find any jurisdictional error in the impugned order. Accordingly, this civil revision application is dismissed with a direction to the court below to ensure that whatever arrears and current amount has become payable on account of passing of the impugned order is realized from the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/