-= : 1 : =- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.4882 OF 2004 WRIT PETITON NO.4882 OF 2004 WRIT PETITON NO.4882 OF 2004 Shri Subhash Jadhav & 13 Ors. ..Petitioners. V/s. Member, Industrial Court Maharashtra & 2 Ors. ..Respondents. Ms.Prachi Sabnis i/b. Seema Sarnaik for petitioner. None for respondents. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED : 4TH APRIL, 2006. DATED : 4TH APRIL, 2006. DATED : 4TH APRIL, 2006. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- None for the respondents. Ms.Prachi Sabnis holding for Mrs.Seema Sarnaik submits that she has withdrawn her appearance from the case. However, there is no order on record permitting her to take discharge from the case. 2. This petition is directed against the order dated 4/5/2004; whereby the complaint came to be dismissed as not maintainable. The objection of the employer challenging jurisdiction of the Court has been sustained. 3. It appears from the cause title of the -= : 2 : =- petition that the names of all the petitioners, except petitioner Nos.9 and 14 are deleted from the array of parties with the result impugned order has become final and conclusive against deleted petitioners. 4. If this petition is allowed, then, it may give rise to two inconsistent orders which cannot be allowed to stand in one proceedings. In this view of the matter, the petition is liable to be dismissed on this count alone. 5. Even otherwise, the findings recorded by the trial Court appears to be a reasonable and possible view, which needs no interference. The petition is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. ******