THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1369 OF 2011 ORDER: 1 Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Reddy learned counsel for the petitioner/husband. 2 This petition is filed questioning an interim maintenance order granted by the Additional Family Court, Hyderabad. The impugned order dated 31.05.2011 would show that the main maintenance case which is under section 125 Cr.P.C is a part heard one and at that stage the wife and the daughter of the petitioner filed an interim maintenance application. The Family Court granted a sum of Rs.2,000/- to the wife and Rs.1,000/- to the minor daughter per month. The learned counsel for the petitioner/husband now says that the petitioner has only a monthly income of Rs.3,500/- and he cannot pay the amount and he was also not given an opportunity by the Family Court. This contention cannot be said to be correct. The impugned order shows that the husband was represented by his counsel by name Sri Y. Subhash and it is indicated in the preamble. Then coming to the reasonableness of the amounts, it may be noted that the trial court granted only Rs.2,000/- to the wife and Rs.1,000/- to the minor daughter per month and the said amounts can be considered reasonable. 3 Sri Ashok Kumar Reddy now says that the husband is a sickly person and he has also filed a doctor certificate showing that the petitioner is suffering from low back pain and Sciatica. In this revision this medical evidence cannot be considered. The petitioner can adduce this medical evidence before the trial court since the case is still said to be a part heard one. The trial court has given all the reasons for granting interim maintenance amounts and there is no compelling ground to interfere with that order. 4 Accordingly this revision case is dismissed at the admission stage. ------------- 30.06.2011 Kvsn