1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 740 of 2011 1. Ravinder Singh, S/o Sohali 2. Rajkali, S/o Sohali Both R/o Vill. Dalluwala, Majbatta P.S. Ranipur, District Haridwar …..…Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Senior Superintend of Police, District Haridwar 2. Station Officer, Police Station Ranipur District Haridwar 3. Rajender Singh, S/o Shri Dheer Singh R/o Village Dalluwala, Majbatta P.S. Ranipur, District Haridwar ……….Respondents Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate, present for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, A.G.A., present for the State. Hon'ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard. 2. By means of this writ petition moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought quashing of the First Information Report no. 261 of 2011, relating to offences punishable under section 307, 325, 506 IPC, Police Station Ranipur, District Haridwar. 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that initially the crime was registered in respect of offences punishable under section 325, 506 IPC. Section 307 IPC, said to have been added later. It is also pointed out that petitioner no. 2 Rajkali who is a old woman, and one Kirat Singh themselves suffered injuries in the incident but their report was not lodged. Injury on the person of Rajender Singh (complainant) shows that he suffered the injury on the head. 4. In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion into the matter, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the investigation of the case. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that if the petitioners Ravinder Singh and Rajkali surrenders before the court concerned their bail application shall be heard, and disposed of without unreasonable delay keeping in mind that they are themselves injured in the incident, and further that petitioner no. 2 is a woman. (Stay application no. 8951 of 2011, stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Parul 30.08.2011 3