Ladda 1 wp-306-11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 306 OF 2011 Ibrahim Gulamnabi Shaikh ...Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors ...Respondents ...... Mr A.R. Prajapati, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms M. H. Mhatre, A.P.P.for the State. Mr Vinod wadhwa, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 to 7. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- 10th February, 2011. P.C. 1. The petitioner has alternative efficacious remedy. It will be open to the petitioner to pursue other remedy by way of private complaint, if so advised. We are not inclined to exercise our writ jurisdiction in the fact situation of the present case, having noticed that the dispute is essentially a personal matter between the petitioner and respondent Nos. 4 to 7. 2. Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner as aforesaid. Needless to observe that criminal complaint to be filed by the petitioner Ladda 2 wp-306-11 would proceed in accordance with law without being influenced by disposal of this writ petition. (A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)