r <fc IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION CC^ N0. ^ ^ OF 2010 PETITIONER •^'€>^ ^^^ss \u ^ ^ss^ ^^.^" ^ '^^- RESPONDENTS Mitan Singh Thakur, aged about 40 years, S/o Shri Bishnath, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat^ Bhedasar, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS :1.^ State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Panchayat &. Rural Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector, Durg (C.G.), 3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), District Durg (C.G.) ^' 4. Shri Puran Lal Deshmukh, Panch, Gram Panchayat Koudiadih, R/o. Village Panchayat Koudfadih, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.) ^"" 5. Shri Mehettar Ram deshmukh, R/o. Village Panchayat Koudiadih, Tahsi.1 and District Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTIQN_QF_INDIA ^ HIOH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR Sinate Bech: Hon'Me Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Writ Petition (Gt No.37/2010 Petftioner Resoondents Versus Milan Singh Thakur State of Chhattisgarh and others. Shri Vaibhav Shukla, counsel for the pet'rtioner. Shri Susheet Dubey, Govt. Advocate for respondents 1 to 3/State. None appears for respondents No. 4 & 5. Writ Petition under Article 228 oftheConstitution ot India ORAL ORDER (07.01.2010) Heard on admission. Order chatlenged in this writ petition frted under Articte 227 of the Constitution of India was passed on 16.11.2009 by the Court of Additional Collector, Durg in appeal No.20-A/89,2008-09. The said order is appealable under Section 91 read with Chhattisgarh Panchayat Appeal and Revision Rule 1993. In view of existence of attemative remedy, the instant petftion is dlsmissedwfth liberty to the petitioner to prefer a revision before the concemed authority. ^4 pras,hantKumarMishra Judge ^