IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16 of 2011 1. MEENA DEVI W/O SIRO YADAV 2. SIRO YADAV S/O LATE GARJU PD. YADAV BOTH R/O VILL- SHADPUR, P.S.-AMARPUR, DIST. BANKA ………………… Petitioners Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SHIVEKA PD. YADAV S/O LATE SURESH PD. YADAV R/O VILL- MANJHGAON, P.S. SHAMBHUGANJ, DIST- BANKA ……………….Opposite Parties ----------- 2. 11.02.2011 Heard the parties. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 22.11.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-V, by which he has refused to discharge the petitioners in Sessions Trial No. 639/2010, in a case which was instituted under Section 304-B I.P.C. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are parents-in-law and during investigation none of the independent witnesses supported the case of the prosecution and in fact they have stated that the present case was instituted to black mail the family members of the husband of the deceased and even though it was found that the deceased died on account of poison, there is no external injury found on her person. Since at the stage of charge, the court is not permitted to hold mini trial, I am not inclined to interfere in the order impugned. The application is dismissed. Fahad. ( Anjana Prakash, J. )