BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Third day of November Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.15205 of 2011 TAMILSELVI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY & DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.2258 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. ARUNACHALAM @ ARUN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 506(ii) of IPC read with section 4 Tamilnadu Prohibition Charging of Exorbitant Interest Act in Crime No.2258 of 2011, on the file of the respondent police. She has approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal procedure. 2. Heard Mr.Arunachalam @ Arun, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that due to civil dispute, the petitioner has been falsely implicated and she is an innocent person. He would also submit in his argument that she is also having permanent residence and therefore, he would request for the grant of anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the investigation is pending and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, suitable conditions may be passed for the secured presence of the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and considering the fact that the petitioner is a woman, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner directing her not to involve in the similar offence in future, of course, subject to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ certain stringent conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, in the event of her arrest or on her appearance before the Judicial Magistrate concerned on executing bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.5, Madurai, and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks for the purpose of interrogation. 7. The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 23/11/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.5, MADURAI. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY & DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. ARUNACHALAM @ ARUN Advocate SR.No.41049 SR : 24.11.2011 : 2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15205 of 2011 Date :23/11/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/