(/f/IW IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WP. (S) No. 7 3 % [2010 PETITIONER Sukhnath‘ Halba, S/o. Shri Bhukhau Halba, aged about 55 years, R/o. Village — Thehni, Post — Belarbahra, Tahsil — Nagri, Distt. Dh-amtari (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / (l State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) /«(2) Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division (Samanya), Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari‘ (C.G.)' ,.r(3) Depot Officer, office of Depot Officer (forest), Nagri, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ) @E Wm wgx u; a’\£.v"lb%é/Cn? Wm ‘gi 200 m mmmm Shri Viaod Dashmukh, c011 sel for that pafiticnrir. Shii Ajif, Singh, PL. for the Tam. Grievanm: of the petitioner ' the present petition. is that though he is emitled for hiS ragul 'zation on tbs post of Forest. Guaxd, he has boon mgulan’zed on tho gxost ofwatchman‘ Counsel for tho petitioner bmits that the rcsponclcots have completed all the formalities or passing necessary order in favour of the petitioner and theref re at this stage the petitioner may be permitted to Withdraw th present petition with liberty to E16 a fresh representation bef re respondent No.2 and the same may be directed to be decid d in accordance with kw as expeditiously as possible. Counse1 for the State sub its that Without ascertainmg the fact he cannot make auy atement whether the State Government is willing to reguiari the services of the petitioner on the post of Forest Guard o not. However, he has no objection if the petitioner makes a representation before the authority concerned and the ame is decided by it in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction > that in the event of any represe tation tiled by the petitioner before respondent No.2 raising 's grievances, the same is into eta P $3.: HGN’BLE JgSTICE MR. 1342-2010: WTm W200 W mw1iwm mmmvfga _ $WW expected to be decided by the authon'ty concerned in accordance with law as expeditiou 91y aspossible. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the napresentation of the petitioner Wm WW [tire oi? 7/’§ ’\ s‘m'ctiy in accordance with law, f fir, r r Sdl- Pritinker Diwaker 1% Judge