7IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT APPEAL NO.377 OF 2002 TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST, TWO THOUSAND AND NINE Between: M. Surender .... Appellant And: M/s. Electronics Corporation of India Limited (ECIL) Hyderabad, rep. By its Chairman and Managing Director. ....Respondent. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT APPEAL NO.377 OF 2002 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Prakash Rao) The learned counsel for the appellant represents that the appellant has already attained the age of superannuation. Hence the cause in this Writ Appeal does not survive requiring any further adjudication. Recording the said representation, the Writ Appeal, is dismissed as tuous. No order as to costs. ____________________ B. PRAKASH RAO,J _______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY ,J Date:25.08.2009. Gk. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY WRIT APPEAL NO.377 OF 2002 JUDGMENT DATE:25.08.2009. Gk.