31# * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 757/2011 & Crl. M.A. No. 6302/2011 (Stay) OJo NA VEEN KR. CHAUHAN & ANR ..... Petitioners versus STATE& ORS CORAM: Through: Mr. Bhisham Singh and Mr. Ravi Lomod, Advocates with Petitioners in person. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Harsh Prabhakar and Ms. Damini Khaira, Advocates for Mr. Paw an Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State with SI Tika Ram, PS Sangam Vihar. Respondent No. 3 in person. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER 14.09.2011 Respondent No. 3, father of Petitioner No.2, is present in person and is identified by SI Tika Ram, PS Sangam Vihar. Respondent No.3 states that the Petitioner No. 2 is a major and since he has come to know that she has married of her own free will, he has no grievance left. Learned proxy counsel for the learned Standing Counsel for the State states that the missing report which was lodged by the Respondent No. 3 will be filed in view of the fact that the Petitioner No. 2 is a major and has married the Petitioner No. 1 of her own free will. In view of the statement of Respondent No. 3, learned counsel for the Petitioners on instructions from the Petitioners, who are present in Court, states that he does not press the present petition and application. Present petition and application are dismissed as not pressed. SEPTEMBER 14, 2011/'vn' Signing Date:02.09.2024 17:06:31 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified