IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2100 of 2008 BABY KUMARI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR &ORS . ----------- 2/ 09/03/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner claims to have been selected for appointment and sent on training the post of Angan Bari Sevika. Before she could be appointed after the training, a show cause notice was issued to her on 5.10.2007 that her selection had been found to be bad and required her to show cause. The petitioner claims to have submitted her reply to the same on 22.10.2007 before the District Magistrate whereafter nothing further has been communicated to her leading to the institution of the writ petition. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State. It simply states in paragraph-8 that her appointment has been cancelled. No date of cancellation is mentioned, much less has any final order of the District Magistrate been annexed as an annexure to the counter affidavit. This Court, therefore, refuses to accept the stand of the State in the counter affidavit that the 2 selection of the petitioner has been cancelled. This Court holds that matters rest at the stage of issuance of a show cause notice and the reply filed by the petitioner. Let the District Magistrate pass a reasoned and speaking order afresh, within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)