IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8722 of 2010 1. MAHENAJ BEGAM, W/O MD. AFROZ ALAM R/O VILL BISHAHARIA, P.S.BHARGAMA, DISTT-ARARIA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ARARIA 3. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, ARARIA 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BHARGAMA, DISTT- ARARIA 5. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME OFFICER, BHARGAMA, DISTT-ARARIA 6. THE MUKHIA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ BISHHARIA, BLOCK BHARGMA, DISTT-ARARIA with CWJC No.8944 of 2010 1. HIRAWATI DEVI W/O JAIKANT PASWAN R/O VILL.- REHUWA, P.S. RANIGANJ, DISTT.- ARARIA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVT. OF BIHAR 3. THE DIRECTOR, INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SCHEME, UNDER DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ARARIA 5. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, ARARIA 6. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, RANIGANJ BLOCK RANIGANJ, DISTT.- ARARIA 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, RANIGANJ, ARARIA 8. THE MUKHIA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ CHHATIYONA, P.S. RANIGANJ, DISTT.- ARARIA with CWJC No.9198 of 2010 1. MEENA DEVI, W/O MATHURANAND MANDAL, R/O VILLAGE JAMUA, P.S.- TARABARI,DISTRICT-ARARIA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ARARIA. 3. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, ARARIA. 4. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, ARARIA, DISTRICT- ARARIA. 5. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME OFFICER, ARARIA, DISTRICT-ARARIA. 6. THE MUKHIA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ JAMUA BLOCK- ARARIA, DISTRICT-ARARIA. with CWJC No.9230 of 2010 1. NUJHAT ARA W/O MD.SARWAR ALAM R/O VILL.- LAHTORA, P.S.& DISTT.- ARARIA 2. NIKAHAT ARA W/O MD.ASFAQUE ALAM R/O VILL.- LAHTORA, P.S.& DISTT.- ARARIA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVT. OF BIHAR 3. THE DIRECTOR, INTERGATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SCHEME UNDER DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ARARIA 5. THE DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER, ARARIA 6. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, RANIGANJ BLOCK, RANIGANJ, DISTT.- ARARIA 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, ARARIA 8. THE MUKHIA null GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ CHATAR, P.S.- ARARIA, DISTT.- ARARIA ----------- 02. 16.09.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for leave to purse remedies before the Commissioner of the Division. Learned counsel for the State submits that perhaps, Second Appeal before the Commissioner may not lie. It is not for the Court to pre-empt the petitioners from pursuing the remedies which they desire to. The rest is for the Commissioner to decide. The application is disposed with the aforesaid observations. P.K. ( Navin Sinha, J.)