IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8325 of 2010 AMIT KUMAR Versus THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD ----------- 2 12.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is evident from annexure-10 which is an application made by the petitioner against the so called omission and breach committed by the selection committee and is dated 19.2.2010. The respondent IOC has been slow in responding to the complaint of the petitioner and their finding on the issue has not been conveyed to the petitioner till date. The brochure and the grievance redressal mechanism are laid down time frame. The Court expects that the respondent authority to keep that in mind. It is the delay factor which compelled the petitioner to approach to the Court. This writ application is disposed of with a direction that the designated authority of the IOC shall ensure that the allegations are investigated and the outcome of the same is communicated to the petitioner. An early decision in this regard will surely tame the issue. If the reasons do not satisfy the petitioner the forum is still available to him. This writ application is disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)