-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.624 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.624 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.624 OF 2006 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Ms Namrata Waghole i/b Mr.T.S.Ingale for the Appellants CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: AUGUST 7, 2006. AUGUST 7, 2006. AUGUST 7, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Appellants. After having heard the Advocate for the Appellants and perusal of the impugned Judgments, I find that both the courts have held that the Appellants-Plaintiffs have failed to establish that they have one half share in the well and half share in the trees located in Gat No.48. The findings are based on oral and documentary evidence on record. No substantial question of law arises. Second Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Judge. Judge. Judge.