7/ HESH COURT OF CHHATTESSARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. Ul of 2004 PsTitioners 1. Laiia Prssad ©Lais Prascd s/o Bar-utu Rom, oged ubout 55 vears,r/o "it'ags Boijnathpur, PQST BhciyaThcrt, Td-isiS 5ut*ajpur-, Oistr-ict Surguja, f C-. l/*£?. 2. Versus Respondents 1. 2. Purushottam 6ond. s/o Shri ^uran 6ond, aged cbout 55 years, r/o villoge Posta, Post beonagar, Tehsil Surajpur, District Surguja, C.G. Shankh Lai s/o Mehi'.a!, aged about 45 years, r/o viltaae Kusumusi, Post BhaEyathun, Tehsil Sur-ajpur, bistrict 5urguja, C.6. The State of Chhattisgarh, through •rhe 5ecreTary, Pubtic Works Deuortment, Raipur; C.6. The Sub &iviSiona! Officer-. Public Works &ep<ytmenT, (Buitdinq &, Roads) Ambikapur, District 5ur9uja, C.6. WRFT PETTTOIN UN&ER ARTKLE 226/227 OF TOFCONSTrPJTEQN O? INDIA SlrgSe Bench ; Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri. J- Shri A. K. Prosad, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V- 5- Thukur, &epu1y Advocste Senera! for the re^aondents- ORAL ORuER psssed on this is+ day of August, 2008) Leomed counse! uppearing for ti-ie petitiorier, on instnictiun, ajbmits -rtiot the petitioner seeks permission •{•o iniithdraw •rtiifi petition- Learried counse! uppear-ing for the respondents has _no ohjection to the ubove subiriission- Tn view of -rt-ie above, l+ie petition is dismissed as Uiithdrouin. Consequentiy M('»*»'pNo. 120/2004 stunds dismissed. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge gSSSIs'"^3£?^