4 z 4 0I 0 IN ThE HIGH COURT OP K.AEI4ATAKA AT BANGAIRE X DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY 0? JUNE 1998 13ERE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.C. BFLARULA 4 WRIT PETITION NO:7174—75/19% 0 BETWEEN: 1, Sri B.S.Malliksrjuna, e/o Srikants Di.xit, aged major, 2. 5 ri H.Muralidharan, 6/0 P.N.Harikrihenan, aged major, 8 otb petitioners are working as Lecturer in Economics, M.E.S 0 ollege, Malleewaram, 4 Banelore, (By Sri V.Lakahminsrayana, Ad’,) ..PetitionerE AND: 1. The State of Karnataka rep by its Secretary, Department of Education, ).S.i3uilding, 4 Dr.B.i.Ambedkar Veetihi, Bangalore—5 60 001. z 2. The Director of Collegiate Education, eehadri Rosd, Bangalore—560 001. 0 0 —2-. 3. The Principal, M.E& College, Malleewaram, Bangsb re—3. (By 6ri G.Papi eddy, AGA for 1Li &2) L.3 served. .Reepondente . . . This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to direct the respondents to pay salar7 from 1.9.94 immediately and declare that non—payment of salary from 1.9.94 is unjust, illegal and etc., I hie petition coming on for orders this dey the Court made the following: ORDER... 2 0 0 ()I z U0I D0 UI0I —: i V.2.7174—7175/96 3 ORDF Heard th 1 T J eg)jJf ‘1 th’ titioner ‘ii 4 V Vdya, learned H C ‘3 0 for tF’ 2. ThL p..titinnerr nc mo1,cec of a Pri’ate Fclu itional institution Tha re1ie et4jmec-l h’ thpi jr. the. prccc.rit wait netitir. PPltdlflS to their crnplnymcnt The Divi on Bench of ‘lii Court in LiLA No. tEVfl tc jP3.’5 md onnected matter’ (DD 3O.0 1°9 ) a- held tht yen if th rn t edu ti nil n’titutxon h b n dnitted to onsnt it aid urd r thc p .viion I tI C nt—in Aid Codc b the Ctjt) qov rnment cdli r ‘i r ‘up of mi tar *nd er ant between the jovernment and the osrone likt the pet1tione r.omv’cs into bet pq sn-f tbnrr.fon. the. wilt pq.titinns filed Lw £u’h cmnlnvee2 Att ntt malnflhi,ePile under Artila r of th ro’,t ttjjq of Tndta tint-a tht have ffecti’e. effjcaric,itc and alterntl.,e. tatiitnrv rertiedjes aai1abl.e under tja Key natdkt n A t 11 C hi I t’). T LI Cf it CC t t t’ tL(.Ti ‘Id H TM As rega’-th the locus standi of taff w.Tkirig in tha aforesaid educational iytstttutions t-, mnt.., the writ petitions 4 they have go’ tha ,emedv of aeal under Cct ton 94 cf th.t Education Acr aqainet an order of dismissal or vernoval from service or ,edt.rttnn in r*nk, tinder c.rtcc,n 130, appeal je prr’vided aoaint am’ ndpr r,aeicied by an offire or ttfl,tty tinder tho Act Setinn 11 providec for ratsition IT.’ Anuprpmcn+ mStber sign me t •-r nn en a’n’H ,, ft •Ri RP9 90” lnPsar’nt ii er.tir.n 1?2 t the frItvsitc i Act r.rnh,ida.e r v w by t he St ate Gover am n o t h r uo met a or cn n application i civod fio cn person I at crested , Th€ Gov€ r am at i 1 a v sLed with the power to give dii etioi und e tion 123 o the aid cict to make eneuir ke ero’r ietc proaodnq by the Fommiasi r Dirc ‘e oc en’ other officcr not below thc rank of Diet t Fducatjonai Officer and ta euhm’ Ternr the FT[cat ion ct erc)jde fe” paee1, r;iran nH a respect o’ er anO in the eb’en cf an erder , the (‘ec’ naent can be mc’cc for iscuing necesears dTi-ecte in exorcien ef it powsi indr Sect ion 123 end the staff can eve t h said remedies Even with ecard f pa’ment ef ealary, what is ste’ed dove wjt.h rCcTCrci t the teaching and non—teaching t af epol the thei staff else, tlithout xhastina such alternative remedy, tho cannot he oermittcd to nvnke the extr aordina / jurisdict ion af this Court under Grticl,e 226 of the Oot tut Ion,” 4. For th€ afc,iesad reeren the writ ractitiorec are dinaiesnd on the ground of availability of efficacious and €ffectie alternative reerd Howeva r all t hr r I ght a a i z U0I D0 I0t coat it ion 0f the part i i icr it’ ci k . t open for hoin3 ad I t petit’ ajitatai before the pr ‘ t t t tr we f flijig ço I ani tI’e G t withi ci’ LJFK f or t d fri ng I t[e ocrne t te irt filing thereof. If c hor it los If c titut ry r fl(l r cc’ i ‘r the a nt f iii diep I p 1 1 ‘ I THPE rnantha ft a I, ha’ already Ir a northe from the dci a of ommuni act n f t [is c(Jc Sd/ JUDGE