IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN FRIDAY, THE 20TH JULY 2007 / 29TH ASHADHA 1929 Cont.Case(C).No.1088 of 2007(S) -------------------------------------------------------------- (ARISING FROM THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.3618/2007 DATED 13/02/2007) .................... PETITIONER/PETITIONER:- -------------------------------------- KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PROJECT DIVISION NO.II, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI-36, SEN JOHN, AGED 53 YEARS, W/O.THANKACHAN V. JOSEPH. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.A.JAYASANKAR. RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:- ---------------------------------------------------- SMT.MINI ANTONY, D/O.ANTONY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF COCHIN. BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHAN DAS. THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- H.L.Dattu,C.J. & K.T.Sankaran,J. ---------------------------------------------------- Cont. Case (C).No.1088 of 2007-S ---------------------------------------------------- Dated, this the 20th day of July, 2007 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu,C.J. The Kerala State Housing Board is before us inter alia alleging that the respondent has disobeyed the orders and directions issued by this Court in W.P.(C).No.3618 of 2007 dated 13th February, 2007. (2) Sri.M.K.Chandramohan Das takes notice for the respondent. (3) On instructions, he would submit that the Corporation shall not dump any waste or garbage in the property which belongs to the Kerala State Housing Board. (4) In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent, in our opinion, no proceedings either under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act or under Article 215 of the Constitution of India need be initiated by us. Therefore, the Petition requires to be rejected and accordingly it is rejected. Ordered accordingly. H.L.Dattu Chief Justice K.T.Sankaran Judge vku/DK.