IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17593 of 2011 MD. SHAMIM @ SHAMIM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 27.06.2011. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Gulnar Begum learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the D. P. Act. The accusation is of demand of dowry. It appears from the impugned order that the petitioner was ready for reconciliation and also filed the restitution case. Though initially the complainant was ready to accept the offer but the order dated 22.11.2010 reflects that subsequently she refused to reside with the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is still ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and 2 honour. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 393C of 2008 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Lakhisarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The grant of bail to the petitioner will not preclude the complainant in resuming the conjugal life. If any, such petition will be filed then the petitioner will take the complainant to her matrimonial house to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)