1 SB Civil Writ Petition No.7864/2008 Mohan Lal. vs. Lal Chand. c S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7864/2008 Mohan Lal. vs. Lal Chand. Date : 13.1.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.LR Choudhary, for the petitioner. Mr.Ravi Bhansali, for the respondent. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner/defendant is aggrieved against the order of the trial court dated 23.8.2008 as the trial court granted permission to the plaintiff/respondent to obtain the opinion of the expert on the petitioner's own document. Learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant submitted that the respondent/plaintiff did not controvert the fact alleged by the defendant in the written statement by filing rejoinder and the plaintiff has relied upon the fact of one other case to challenge the document filed by the 2 SB Civil Writ Petition No.7864/2008 Mohan Lal. vs. Lal Chand. defendant. Since the document itself was produced by none else then the defendant and he is yet to be cross examined by the plaintiff, therefore, to destroy the case of the defendant, if the plaintiff is using the document of the defendant and obtaining the expert opinion and the trial court found that that opinion may be relevant, I do not find any illegality in the said order of the trial court which has been passed within the jurisdiction of the trial court. Consequently, this writ petition, having no merits, is dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya