SBCWP NO.5672/09. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5672/2009. Raj Kumar Dewan Vs. Rent Tribunal, Sikar & Ors. Date of Order:- May 11, 2009. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Smt.Sangeeta Sharma for the petitioner. ****** BY THE COURT:- Petitioner has filed writ petition against the order dated 20/4/2009 passed by the Rent Tribunal Jaipur by which his application for summoning of three witnesses of defendant-respondents on a one single date for the purpose of cross-examination by him was rejected and subsequent order dated 29/4/2009 whereby his application for deferring the matter till he challenge the first order before the higher court was rejected. 2) Smt.Sangeeta Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner wanted all the three witnesses of the defendants to be summoned on one single date so he could cross them about Exh.A-11 which is a photostat copy of a document, existence of original of which is not yet proved and therefore he did not want his stand to be known to other witnesses before hand as it might prejudice his SBCWP NO.5672/09. 2 defence. 3) Smt.Sangeeta Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner could not show any provision whereunder a litigant would insist for summoning of witnesses together. Upon perusal of the impugned- order, it appears that when evidence of the petitioner was being recorded, he was allowed as many as 15 dates and for the purpose of cross-examination also, witness of defence Vishnu Kumar has appeared before the court on as many as five times but he refused to cross-examine him. Learned trial court therefore by the impugned-order dated 29/4/2009 rightly granted one last opportunity to the petitioner for cross-examination by 11/5/2009. 4) I do not find any infirmity in either of the impugned-orders. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ) J. anil