HI<SH COURT OF CHHATTISOARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 2360 of 2006 Petitioner Kishan Patel Aged - 46 years, S/o <rf Shri Gendu Ram Patel Po^sd as - Bhritya (Peon), At - S.S. I^Ubad! Hr. Sec. School, Kalibadl, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) R/o Santoshf Nagar (Tajnagar), Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. 2 3 The StEte of Chhirttisgarh Threugh- The Secretary, School Educaflon Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur The Oirector, Pubtte Inslructions, Chhattisgarh Head Quarter at - Raipur. The Govemmg Body of Kalibadi Shiksa Samiti, Through-ite School Secreteiy, S.S. teli Badi Hr. Sec. School, Kaltbadi, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION U/A - 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Justice Shri Satish K. Agnihotri Present: Mr. R.K. Keshaiwani, Advocate for the p^iUoBer. Ms. Deepali Pandey, Panel lawyer for ttie respondents No. 1 and 2/State. ORDER (Passed on thss 16m day of April, 2007) 1. The question of law involved herein is whether the non-teaching steff woridng in Govemment aicted school are entitled to the benefit of recommendations of the FifUi Pay Commission umtor the (wovistons of the Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Sikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tattia Anya Karmchariyon Ke Velano Ka Sandaya) Adhini^m, 1978 (henctfofth the Adhiniyam, 1978') and the rules rnade ttereunder real with the Madhya Pradesh Revision of Pay Rules, 1988 ^ienceforth the Pay Rules, 1988'). 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the petittoner submits that the terms and conditions of the teaching and non-teaching staff are govemed by the r ^ ^. Thakur same prwriaions ^ lew whioh were undw constderatton by ttiia Court in the matter ofSmt. A. Lall vs. State of ChhatUsgarh and other connected matters (W.P. No. 4108 of 20CB), wheretn by the judgment and order dated 6.2.2007, this Court held that the petitionera who are working in fully Govemment akled private schools are entitled to the revised pay-scales with effect from 1.1.1996 as prescribed under the Pay Rules, 1988. This Court further for the purpose of payment of arrears had granted cejtain direcUon. Admittedly and jointly, it is submitted by the parties that this matter is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 62.2007 passed by this Court in fhe case of Smt. A. Lalt vs. State of Chhattisgarh and other connected mattere (Supra). As a result, for the reasons stated in ttie judgment and order dated 6.2.2007 passed in W.P. hto. 4108 of 2005 (Smt. A. Lall vs. State of Chhattisgarh and other connected matteis) (Supra), the writ petition is allowed in the same terms and conditions. -— Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge