1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Third day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.11053 of 2011 1.SELVARAJ 2.MAHESH 3.RABAIDEEN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUCHENDUR TALUK POLICE STATION, THIRUCHENDUR TALUK, TUTICORIN DISTRICT. CRIME NO.643/2008 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. D.NAGESH BABU Advocate For Respondent : MR. A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 420, 466, 467 and 120(b) IPC in Crime No.643 of 2008 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioners were charged under Sections 420, 466, 467 and 120 (b) ICP. He further submitted that one Paulraj brother of the first petitioner lodged a complaint before the respondent police that the first petitioner created a forged Will regarding their ancestral property and made a gift deed in favour of his son the second petitioner herein. The third petitioner said to have attested to gift deed. He further submits that the petitioners have not committed any offence and they are innocent persons and hence, he prsy for enlargement on anticipatory bail. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the investigation is going on and hence he prays for dismissal of this application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and even though the petitioners were not arrested they neither interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchendhur, and each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchendhur, and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 23/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUCHENDUR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUCHENDUR TALUK POLICE STATION, THIRUCHENDUR TALUK, TUTICORIN DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. D.NAGESH BABU Advocate SR.No.28621 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11053 of 2011 Date :23/08/2011 TR : 25.08.2011: 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/