IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20136 of 2011 1.Amar Ram Mukhiya @ Amar Ram, Son of Shankar Ram, resident of Village Mathia Tola, Majharia, P.S. Lauria, District West Champaran at Bettiah. 2.Ramashish Ram, Son of Late Anwat Ram, Resident of Village Tunia Bishunpur, P.S. Manuapool, District West Champaran at Bettiah. -------Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party --------------- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Amrendra Kumar - No. 1, Advocate. For the State :- Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ---------------- 04/- 27/09/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary. The two petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case being Mukhiya and Panchayat Sewak of a particular Panchayat with allegations of granting undue support to one Jilebi Devi to get benefits of Indira Awas Scheme as wife of elder brother of the informant, namely, Sudama Sah, who undisputedly, died on 29.04.2008 leaving his widow Sobha Devi, who also left the place and married with another person. Submission is that Jilebi Devi as wife of Sudama Sah @ Thag Sah has independent identity having no concern with Sudama Sah, deceased brother of the informant. The investigation is still going on. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, till conclusion of the investigation/submission of the charge-sheet (specifically on the point of identity of Jilebi Devi other than wife of the deceased brother of the informant), in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail- bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, in connection with Lauria P.S. Case No. 51 of 2011, subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below till conclusion of the investigation/submission of the charge-sheet and in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)