fiR-P- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.1 WRITPETITION(S)NO. 4-^ J OF 2007 PETITIONER ,0 '[••• .o^^'^ ..-•".^^\s ^•"'^A-" /^>-" RESPONDENTS ^ Bhola Prasad Chauhan Son of /'" Shri Punifem Chauhan, aged r about 37 years; Presently posted at Govt. Primary School Sanbahli, Block Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State 'of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). .^ fc'K ^» >D*( ' ^2. The District Education Officer, /^~) ^, <<%, Mahasamund, District y ^o''\ ^ \\\' ^" Mahasamund (C.G.). . ^t.6 3. The Block Education Officer, Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.). tf) s»" ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,_ 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. ' MANDAMUS ETC. AND FOR APPROPRIATE ORDER/ORDERS.DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. HMH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT BUASPUR SIN6LE BENCH : HOhTBLE NR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PETITION (S.) N».4S8OF 2007 Petitioner : Duryodhan Sao wrsus Reapondents Stu*e of Chhattisgnrh and olhers igyu" WRTT PETTTION (S.) No.-»9OF 2007 Petitioner : Narsngh Khunte ysrsa ReSDondwrts Stute of Chhattisgnrh and o'thers WRTT PFrmON (S.) No.460 OF 2007 Petitioner versus ReawnduTts Atalit<ramNog State of Chhattisgorh ond o-thers WRTT PFmiON (S.l NB.461 OF 2007 Ptetitioner : Bhola ProBod Chauhan < veraus ftespondents : State of Chhatfisgarh ond olhers WRTT P6TCTION (S.) No.462 OF 2007 Petitioner : Anwrbilca 5ao versus Reapondents : Shrt* of Chhattisgarh ond o-thers And WRTLPETmON (S.l No.463 OF 2007 Petitioncr Reapondents versus Runeah KumarPatel State of Chhattisgarh and olhws '\, ^: Pnsent : Mr. PJ*. Satai, counael for Ihe petitioner(s). Mr. Satish fiup'ta, Depuly 6oviemment Advocute for Ihe Stete/respondents. OR&ER OPassed on -this 24* Oay of January, 2007) Leamed counael afyearing for -ttie parties jointly ibmit 'thait the focts and question of h»(involved in •the present bartch of writ petitions are squarely covered fay •the decision of this Cowt in •the case of yadniwit Kumw BhaiWhw^ is. <(funto(BB/ Caipuvtlan. Owy t»id aiwrtw/^. 2. For •rtie aforementioned nwsons, Ihese wrH- petrlKms are diaposed of 'vn terms of 1he decision of this Court- h Ihe mofttw of Yeahwant Kumar eswlwaj (Supra), subject to verifiartion of the fact as to wihether •the petitioners haw acquired B.TX CertificoAes at •their wn v expenses as pcr •the drculars dated 24-12-1998 cnd l-3-1999 cnd fur'ther whether -they h<we been paid two advnnce incnsments or not. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of Ihis order be phced on -ttie record of Ihe connected writ petitwns. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge Thdur 1 2006CII)MPJft-C696