IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 27032 of 2010 Ram Kishen and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. G.S. Gopera, Advocate for Mr. Yogesh Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Deepak Girotara, AAG, Haryana for the State. ***** RANJIT SINGH J. Prayer in the main petition is for seeking quashing of the FIR on the basis of compromise. It is strange that the counsel for the petitioners has not been able even to ascertain the address of the complainant and is praying for quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise. The petitioners have wasted enough time of the Court. Even now the counsel for the petitioners is not aware of the address of respondent No. 3 and is only praying for time to do the needful. Let the petitioners ascertain the whereabouts of respondent No. 3, obtain his address and obtain fresh compromise deed from him and may then approach this Court by filing the fresh petition. The present writ petition is dismissed with the above observations. October 04, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE