IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19731 of 2010 KARAN MANDAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 25.06.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The FIR was lodged against unknown under Sections 302, 364/34 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act by the brother of the deceased when fire arm injuries have been found on the body. The defence is that the petitioner is not named. He has been implicated merely on suspicion. Counsel for the State points out that the impugned order of rejection notices that chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioner and that he was absconding. The orders refusing grant of bail deals with liberty of the citizen. The bail orders are required to briefly indicate reasons as to what passed in the mind of the Court not to grant relief so as to facilitate judicial review. The impugned order does not notice anything from the chargesheet of the nature of the material against the petitioner to curtail his liberty. If absconding was the only reason for rejection and investigation was complete let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Lakhisarai in Lakhisarai PS Case No. 334 of 2004. The bail bonds shall bear photograph and proof of residence of the bailors which shall be verified by the local police before final acceptance. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Additional Sessions Judge, Lakhisarai which passed the order dated 20.3.2010. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)