1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No. 4747 OF 2007 Shahnawaz Khan Ismail Khan v. Subhash Rambhau Bhende _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders Mr.Salim Khan Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.S.M.Puranik Advocate for Respondents. .... CORAM: A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 16 h OCTOBER, 2007. Heard Mr.Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Puranik, learned counsel for respondents. 2. Courts below have concurrently found that as a matter of fact the petitioner is not in possession of the suit land. From the submissions made before me it appears that there is a serious dispute about execution of the agreement itself and the contention that an amount of Rs.7.5 lacs towards consideration was paid in cash does not 2 appeal to my mind. In view of the concurrent finding of fact about possession recorded by the courts below against the petitioner, I do not think there is any scope for interfering with the impugned judgment and order. Petition dismissed. JUDGE /TA/