IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 14472 of 2010 Anupama Sharma .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Dev Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti Jain, AAG, Haryana for the State. Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3. Mr. D.R. Bansal, Advocate for respondent No. 4. Mr. Rakesh Bakshi, Advocate for respondent No. 5. RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner seeks quashing of allotment of plot in Urban Estate, Naraingarh, District Ambala on the ground that 2% quota reserved for Advocates have been mis-utilized by allotting the plots in favour of respondents No. 4 & 5. The petitioner is also an Advocate and may be aggrieved against the action of not being allotted the plot. It is not disputed before me that respondents No. 4 and 5 are Advocates. Whether they are eligible or not would, prima facie, cannot be considered within the domain of this Court to determine. I am, thus, not inclined to invoke my extra ordinary jurisdiction to interfere in such like matters. Dismissed. April 05, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE