IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 1 4 4 6 OF 2004 Between: Reserve Bank of India, Represented by its Executive Director, Central Office, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Road, Mumbai. …. Appellant V/s. Syed Hussain Aga s/o. Syed Aga, Aged about 65 years, Chairman, Hyderabad Co-operative Urban Bank Limited, Yakutpura, Hyderabad & 5-Ors. …. Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Sri K. Srinivasa Murthy Counsel for the Respondents: Sri V. Venkataramana GP for Co-operation THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 1 1 4 6 OF 2004 J U D G M E N T : (Per the Hon'ble Smt. Justice T. Meenakumari) The writ appeal is filed against the order dated 29-4-2004 passed in WPMP.No. 11021 of 2004 in WP.No. 8507 of 2004 by the learned single Judge, whereby the learned single Judge granted interim suspension as prayed for. 2. The main writ petition has been filed seeking writ of certiorari calling for the order of supercession issued by the first respondent in RC.No. 4211/02/6-UB, dated 28-04-2004 and also to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the explanation of the elected committee dated 15- 03-2004 while issuing reminder requisition dated 02-04-2004 and taking decision of superseding the elected committee of the third respondent-bank as arbitrary and illegal and to direct the respondents not to interfere with the management and administration of the third respondent-bank by the elected Directors of the said Bank during their tenure of Office upto April 2008. 3. Heard both sides. 4. The present writ appeal has been filed only against the interim order dated 29-4-2004 passed in WPMP.No. 11021 of 2004 in WP.No. 8507 of 2004 by the learned single Judge. On perusing the impugned order as well as the record, it appears that the relief sought in WPMP.No. 11021 of 2004 and also in WP.No. 8507 of 2004 is one and the same. 5. Under the above circumstances, we deem it appropriate to direct the Registry to post the main writ petition for final hearing after sankranti vacation, 2010. 6. With the above direction, the writ appeal is disposed of. No costs. __________________________ JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI _______________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR 02-XII-2009. I s L THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No. 11 4 6 OF 2004. Judgment of the Division Bench delivered by the Hon'ble Smt. Justice T. Meenakumari) Circulation Entry No. 99 02-XII-2009. COMPUTER No. 43 Court Master: I s L