THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 291 of 2009 Alam and others …... Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ....... Respondents Mr. K.S. Bora, Advocate with Mr. Dharmesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No.4 Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. K.S. Bora, Advocate with Mr. Dharmesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. None for respondent No.4. 2. After due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties; contents of the F.I.R.; perusal of documents filed by the parties; the fact that there is a cross version of the incident of the impugned F.I.R. as Case Crime No. 12 of 2009, u/s 504, 506, 324 and 307 I.P.C.; the fact that F.I.Rs. have been lodged from both the sides; and the fact that both the sides have sustained the injuries in the incident, I do not find that the petitioners are entitled to get the reliefs claimed in the writ petition. 3. I am refraining from commenting on the merits for the case lest it may adversely affect the petitioners’ case at the trial, which is yet to start. 4. However, keeping in view of the fact that there is a cross version and both the parties have sustained the injuries, it is directed that if the petitioners move bail applications before the Subordinate Court, their bail applications shall be disposed of expeditiously without waste of time. 5. The writ petition, therefore, fails and is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed in summarily. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 27.04.2009 Shiv