KPP -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 146 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1172 OF 2010 Ravindranath Shripati Vandre ...Appellant vs. The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents Mr. Kishor S. Patil for the appellant. None for the respondent CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & A.A. SAYED , JJ. DATE: JUNE 14, 2011. P.C. This appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 24th August, 2010 in Writ Petition No. 1172 of 2010. By the impugned order, the learned single Judge set aside the order passed by the Industrial Court, Kolhapur in Complaint (ULP) No. 132 of 1998 and the matter is remanded to the Industrial Court for a fresh trial. The Industrial Court was directed to decide whether the Deputy Regional Employment Office is an ‘industry’. In our view, since the matter is remanded to the Industrial Court to decide the aforesaid issue, the appeal filed against such a remand order is not required to be entertained. It is for the appellant and the concerned respondent to lead appropriate evidence before the concerned Court in respect of their say KPP -2- in the matter. However, considering the fact that the complaint is of the year 1998, we direct the Industrial Court to dispose of the Reference as expeditiously as possible. The learned single Judge has also directed the Industrial Court, Kolhapur to decide the complaint within a period of two years from the date of the order of the learned single Judge. However, the Industrial Court may see to it that the complaint may be disposed of within a period of one year from today. 2. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. P. B. MAJMUDAR, J. A.A. SAYED, J.