1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Application No. 4518 of 2009 . in First Appeal No. 1188 of 2008 Smt.Bhagwatidevi Shankarlal Sureka .. Appellant v/s. Laxmidevi Satyanarayan Chandgothia & Others ..Respondents Ms.Manjeeta Chaudhary i/b. Legal Associates for the appellant Mr.Sandesh Patil for the respondents 2(a), 2(b) and 2(d).. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE & R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED : 24th February, 2010 P.C. : 1. Mr.Sandesh Patil, learned Counsel for respondent nos. 2(a), 2(b) and 2(d) submits that his clients have already created third party rights in favour of M/s.Jeevan Asha Enterprises and now they are in possession of the property. M/s. Jeevan Asha Enterprises are not party to this proceeding. In view thereof, learned Counsel for the applicant does not press this 2 application and seeks liberty to the applicant to file application for adding the third party (M/s. Jeevan Asha Enterprises) as party respondent in these proceeding. Further, she seeks liberty to file fresh application for interim order after their application for adding the third party as party respondent in these proceedings as allowed. This application is disposed of as not pressed, with liberty as prayed. [D.B.BHOSALE, J.] [R.Y.GANOO, J.]