, , , rw ‘ IN THE HIGH Cuum OF MADHYA psmuaba A . OF 4993’ ggsc. FEuTlQN No. ’79 PETI’IlONi-ifi :- District Through Chief Rural Executive Development Officer Agency Bilaspur , lv’: .P . VERSUS l. Jugruram 5/0 Jagtu Driver Bil aspuriiv‘x .P . 2. Labour Court, gk/ Tahsil resident and of Di§tt. Khaparganj Bilaspux, , RESPONBENT : .— Through Presiding Officer, Labour Court, BilaspurkmeP.) . EIlTlON UNDE EK'IICLE ’NS .L" UTIQN ' wuwr H7“, A M ) P R AS C HKBH COURT GF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR (VWét Petition under Articie 226/22? of the Constituiion of mdia} Sing§e Bench : Hon‘bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present.- Shn PB Agrawai 5r Advocate With Shn JK Cmpta 90' 'nse! for the petli’loner Ncne for the respondent No.1 . ORDER ORAL (Passed anthis 18‘ day of January, 201 O) SPC sen: to the respondent No.1 returned back with a remark that “the respondent No.1 had died" No steps have been taken by the petitiener tétt date. In View of foregoing, the writ petition is dismissee as abated. Sdl- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge WRIT PETmON N01 75 CF 1993 PETiTiQNER DSstrmt Rura! Development Agency Versus RESPONDENTS Jugruram & Anoéher