^s^^;.^.,'!. t. S', 1,SB? IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. AT BILASPUR fC.G.l W.P.fSl N0. ^ 7 2-Z- /2006 PETmOBBR: \(^..^ ^i^/ [^y^/y yaf-'^y :4f •iS^.- '•'>.•'' ^/ RBSPOBDEMT8 ^-/^Dev Prasad Mlrl ^ Son of Shrl Lachhl Ram Mlrl, aged about 41 years, Occupatlon- Pradhan Pathak(Upper Dlvlslon Teacher) Govt. Mlddle School Arjunl, Block Akattara Dlstt. Janjglr-champa (C.G.) VERSUS 1. ..o^, ^ ^ ^^^ J^ ^{' ^\^ State of Chhattlsgarh, through the Secretary Government of Chhatttsgarh Department of Educatlon, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Ralpur (C.G.). /2. Dlrector Publlc Instmctlon, Ralpur (C.G.) ^3. Dlstrlct Education Offlcer, Dlstt.-Janjglr Champa (C.G.) /^, ^4. Btock Educatlon Offlcer, Akaltara, Dlstt.- Janjglr Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 03^ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS / ORDERS AND DIRECTIONS AS DEEMEDFIT. XI-HC-78 3^ •^MW^, ®tl1«'iip,Rictwy NIHMI St»*l|C»> **<^'*'* * *\t_'*:^»«•'• • * * »•• * jj_i' lAAy' © 3TI^5T II3W ('iqt^qyr) sn^r w R-<i* awsTi^rsBiiR; waiWHf^ran^T 1.12.2006 Shri AjayDwivedi, tearned Shri Vinay Pandey, learned co|jnsel for the petitioner. P|.L. for the State/respondent. tltie By this petition under Article^ the petitioner seeks a direction to and seniority on the basis of the da(' of the decision rendered by the Jabalpur in Original Application No.[ others Vs. Stateof M.P. and others)) 226/227 of the Constitution of India, respondents to pay the increments (e of his initial appointment in ttie light 14arned State Administrative Tribunal, [2745/1989 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 klated 24.8.1992 fdir 2. Learned counsel appearing order dated 9 October 2006passeti 5473/2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharma | and others) and in Writ Petition (S] State of Chhattisgarh and others)| sjmilarly situated, therefore, the simi|ar 3. The case of the petitioner is| Teacher in the School Education D< two years with the fixed salary. years' probation, the petitionerwas regular pay scale. Other similariyl Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Tribunal vide order dated 24.8.199 made several representations to tiiitCT'H'i wi?ff ff fs:S <Ri*ci< ^;3rf^IT3T)^T the petitioner placed reliance on the by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No. jand another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh No. 5474/2006 (Jai Nath Bajpai Vs. andsubmits that the petitioner is order may be passed. that he was appointed as Assistant ^partment on probation for a period of HoMt|ever, later on, after completion of two [regularized but, he was not given (he situated teachers moved the State regutar pay-scate, wherein learned 9^2 allowed the same. The petitioner acctord the same treatment as he is also fdr XI-HC-78 *(Tt(ttl Sb*IIW TBT"stiqici<i, OTn<i'i<o, Ridwy .W.^.C.^'.^Pr. ^ 200 C, 3ll^<i tia<n (^g^p^T) 3n^?r ?ir f?wK (WT WI^T sbUi* i^ ^ RiTIWdf^cTSn^T 'sni<<Fcl<{l'< Hllcil'ffto^AttfK ^ari^Tsn^T similarly situated, but, the respond^nts have not paid any heed. Thus, this petition. 4. Learned counsel for the pelptioner submite that the petitioner may be allowed to make a representat treatment to the petitioner and sam^ pay-scale which has been sanctioned to other similariy sitojated teacher^ Administrative Tribunal dated 24.8J respondent/State has noobjection.l the facts and cireumstances of th^ on to respondent No.1 to give similar on account of the order of the State fl 992, to which learned counsel for the 5. Having heard learned coun^el for the parties and having regard to case, in the opinion of this Court, the limited prayer made by learned cc(unsel for the petitioner appears to be reasohable. Therefore. the petition^r is allowed to make a representation within a period of twoweeks from tt>day to respondent No.1, raising all his grievances and, in turn, respctident No.1 shall decide the said representation in an objective man|1er within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of such represenljation, after considering all the points raised by the petitioner and taking passed bythe tearned State Admin No. 2745/1989. nto account the order dated 24.8.1992 strative Tribunal in Original Application is i 6. The writ petition direction. No order as to costs. 7. Certifiedcopyasperrules. ingly disposed of with the aforesaid Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge P.T.O.