IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8481 of 2010 1. KUMARI SHABNAM W/O SRI RAMANUJ ROY VILLAGE + P.S. + P.O.- DAHIYA, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI-----PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVT. OF BIHAR, VIKASH BHAWAN, PATNA 2. DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION GOVT. OF BIHAR, BUDH MARG, PATNA 3. REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MUNGER 4. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, BEGUSARAI 5. TREASURY OFFICER, BEGUSARAI 6. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR BEER CHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA-- -------------------------------------RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 2.2.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel the State. By virtue of the reasons indicated in annexure-1 the petitioner’s service have been terminated for not having obtained valid educational degree of B. Ed. after appointment on 5.10.87. This exercise or decision contained in annexure-1 is carried out at the behest of a decision rendered by Hon’ble Supreme Court and this fact has emerged with regard to project school in so far as the petitioner is concerned. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that degree from an institution known as All India Correspondence Coaching Society which is registered under the Society Registration Act by the State of West Bengal is a valid piece of diploma degree for her continuance is not acceptable by this Court in view of the fact that there is nothing to indicate that such diploma has any recognition under the State of Bihar or whether this institution is recognized or valid institution. Annexure-2 at page 26 only indicates that the institution is registered by the State - 2 - Government of West Bengal under the Societies Act and that the emblem of the institution is approved and registered by Ministry of Human Resource Development. This does not mean that any diploma degree granted by this institution is a valid piece of educational qualification which is equivalent to regular B. Ed. degree. The decision of the Division Bench (annexure-7) in no manner helps the petitioner because this was not the issue before the Court. Even otherwise this institution was not the subject matter of adjudication or decision of the Division Bench decision contained in annexure-7. This writ application is dismissed as being devoid of merit. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)