IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.490 of 2011 NAND KISHORE SINGH S/O LATE RAM NARAYAN SINGH, R/O VILLAGE BAIRAGI TOLA, P.S. PHULWARIA, DISTRICT-GOPALGANJ. --APPELLANT Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE ADDITIONAL MEMBER, SHRI C. ASHOK VERDHAN, BOARD OF REVENUE, PATNA,BIHAR 3. THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, GOPALGANJ, 4. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND REFORMS, HATHUA, GOPALGANJ. 5. MOTI LAL SINGH, 6. HARI LAL SINGH, 7. BABU LAL SINGH, ALL 5 TO 7 ARE S/O DHARAM NATH SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-BAIRAGI TOLA, P.S. & DISTRICT GOPALGANJ (VENDEE) 8. SMT. DULARI DEVI, WIFE OF RAM PAYAU SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-LAXMIPUR, P.S. PHULWARIA, DISTRICT-GOPALGANJ (VENDOR). -RESPONDENTS 03 30.03.2011 For the reasons stated in I.A. no. 2203 of 2011, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The present Letters Patent Appeal is filed against the order passed in Civil Review no.128 of 2009 dated 10th March, 2010. It is the contention of the petitioner- appellant to recall the order passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. no. 2731 of 2007 and also modification of order dated 16th January, 2009. It, however, appear that the 2 learned single Judge has chosen to dismiss the writ petition on the ground that the three Authorities have rejected the three applications and has given concurrent findings and also on the ground that the transferror did not appear before the concerned Authorities. In view of the findings of the learned single Judge that the three Authorities under the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land ) Act, 1961 have consistently rejected the claim of the appellant on the ground that the purchasers were adjoining raiyats with respect to the land in question, We are of the opinion that the finding of the learned single Judge needs no interference. Accordingly, the Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. AAhmad (T. Meena Kumari, J.) ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)