S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6913/2008 Poona Ram Vs.State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :: 10-09-2008 HON'BLE MR. GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS,J. Mr. N.L. Joshi, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In this case, admittedly petitioner is not disputing the document of sale deed executed by him in the year 1966. The main contention of the petitioner is that the said document is not registered document, therefore on that basis, no mutation can be made. The learned court below including learned Board of Revenue has rightly arrived at with the finding that any document having valuation less than 100 rupees is not required to be registered, in this case, admittedly the value of the document is less then 100 rupees, therefore there was no requirement for registration of the document. The petitioner's plea that it was the duty of the Revenue authorities to assess the value of the land at the time of mutation but they have failed to do so. In my opinion, this plea of the petitioner is dishonest plea because petitioner himself has executed the sale deed in the year 1966 for which he has received consideration of Rs.99 and now after number of years, he himself is raising voice that sale deed executed by him was under valued. In view of the above, this petition is dismissed. [GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS],J. Praveen