IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 8522 of 2008 Between: Vasudeva Sai Rajesh, S/o. Sambasiva Rao, R/o. 13-2-25/A, Latchiraju Street, Kakinada 0 1, East Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Higher Education Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Rep by the Principal Secretary 2 Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, Rep by its Registrar .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in not considering the representation of petitioner dated 9-4-2007 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 & 300A of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation of petitioner dated 9-4-2007 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 & 300A of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation of petitioner dated 9-4-2007 forthwith and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.E.V.V.S.RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 8522 of 2008 ORDER: This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in considering the representation of the petitioner dated 9.4.2007 for extending certain benefits/concessions to the students of B.A., B.Sc., & B.Com., courses suffering from hearing impairment on par with the students who are pursuing M.B.A., M.C.A., Engineering and Pharmacy courses. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 9.4.2007 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law. No costs. _______________ Justice G.Rohini Date:22.04.2009 mrb