:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 281 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 281 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO. 281 OF 2006 IN IN IN LETTERS LETTERS LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 84 OF 2005 PATENT APPEAL NO. 84 OF 2005 PATENT APPEAL NO. 84 OF 2005 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 7924 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 7924 OF 2004 PETITION NO. 7924 OF 2004 IN IN IN INTERIM INTERIM INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 263 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO. 263 OF 2004 APPLICATION NO. 263 OF 2004 IN IN IN PETITION PETITION PETITION NO. D-45 OF 2002 NO. D-45 OF 2002 NO. D-45 OF 2002 Natottam H.Parmar ....Appellants V/s. Nita Prakash Jethva ....Respondents. ====== Noane for the Appellants. Mrs.Sunanda R.Kumbhat, Adv. for the Respondents. CORAM: SMT.RANJANA DESAI, AND SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATED: 17TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : 1. The Learned Counsel for the Appellant is not present. The Learned Counsel for the Respondent states that Petition No.D-45 of 2002 has been disposed off by the Family Court on 21.7.2007. Copy of the order dated 21.7.2007 is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for :2: :2: :2: identification. The Letters Patent Appeal is filed against the order passed by the Learned Single Judge in a Writ Petition where challenge was to an interim order passed by the Family Court. In view of the disposal of the main petition, the learned Counsel for the Respondent submits, that the Letters Patent Appeal has become infructuous. Hence, Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. 2. Needless to say, that all Civil Applications are disposed off. sd/- sd/- (SMT.R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J) (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J)