IN THS HIGH COURT OF CHHA'CTISGAMi AT BILASHJR (C.G.). WRIT PETITI0N N0. -^0/^002 1 PETITIONER Ramgopal^ iS/o» Shri Mundram^ aged aboufe 34 years^ M/o • /Vi 11 • Shivni^ T^b* Ghampa, Dtstt. Janjgir (<3!fiampa) ^Chhattisgarh) » VERSUS RESPONDENTS State ofnChhattisgarh Through s] Distiriot Gollector^ DistrictjiJanjgir (Champa) • ^o f.^\^ •^^' -^^° ^^^- <. ^ ._. __ H. }^.^^!^~ 2^ The Sub l3ivisiQnal Offieer, ^^^^*^*^ ' Tahsil -ijCharnpa,~DistriGt-- ^ ^AC^A^^ ^>^^ jQ^JQir' l(lchanipa) (C»G '^ ., %^ Z7*.,t •y Janjgir KIChampa) (C»Go)• .Y-1 ^1 f\ c^ 3) The Naya^ Tahsildar Tah< Charripa^ Diistt, Janjgir (Chainpa)J4^1£hTniattisgQrh)^ PETITION UNDERARTICLES 226/227 0F_THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUING WRIT; IN TH$| NATURE OF:CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, CO-WARRANT0, PWHIBITibN ;FOK APPKOPRIATE DIRECTION. |1 MWm :Jiilliiri1sl ^l^ XI-HC-22 '3Tj^T '5rT T^fNT 3T[^^ w^^ ^frcf ^ t ^i:'^ 't^'w^'^ ~3~^[-^l^id<{:}, ^^i^4i(o,jl®icni^^< UJ.f.i^^ .5<?0/^)^ Trra^rr-%-qN?"""""'>"'"""""""""""^ 'I^^T' ^?^T^ -Wi^ff ^ fe^ ZN7ZH ^"3^<TR5{T^I 13/11/2002 Shri Sushil Dubey, coi4nsel for fhe petitioner. Having heard the lea^aed counsel, this Court is not mclined to entertam this writj petition, which is directed agaiast issuaxice of notice by tfae Champa, Distdct Jaajgir (Ch4impa). As is clear froin the notice, fhe petitioner has been caUj land bearing Khasra No. 1 12f/7 measuring 0.22 acres situated at Shivni Patwari Halka Nd 19/05/ 1989 passed ia Case ^o. 1A/90-B/88-89. Accorduig fo fhe directuig Tiim to deUver void. In casc what hc says appiDach the Aufhority eventuality, it is for tiie As fiie inatter stands, the order does not arise in que^ti fhe^e under Court of Nayab Tahsildar, Tah. d upon to cleUver possession of ,3 m terms of the order dated pet|tioner, petijtioner, smce ftiere is no order oss^ssion, fhe action is bad, niiU and corrcct, it is for the petitioner to suitable objectioii, In such an Auti|iority to inquire into the xnatter. iou of tEiterference wifb such aii poss^ssion, byfilijag proceediags. If a reniedy is coniinon law he is free to avail available to fhe petitioner the same. It is aUeged that tib|ere is stasidtag crop over fhe land [Tfr^^fe'4 XI-HC-22 3TT^[ •q'7[ f^-TW W^ "^Ri^'^feT •r^ ^"^ '^'ra^PT, ^"Tf^F^ f^FTCTy -^T^, .^^..1C?.^.- wi^r-eoTjr^r'""""""^"""'/""""""^ 200 '^^8?' ia question, This is a fact^ of fhe appropriate aufhority shaU take appropriate actic}n petitioner to fhat Ifcmited ^hich caxi be brought to fhe notice jin. which event fhe said Aufhority to protect fhe iaterest of the ie,, permit him to reniove the ext^nt crpp. With fhe above direcl petition staads disposed of for urgent hearmg also staiid tions aad observations this writ iConsequently I.A. No. 1455/2002 idisposed of, ^PT^mh ^T^ff ^ f^Jt Tf^R:SK ^T ^ff^FT 3TT^T _r*^__— Sd/- P.C. Naik Judge [-qt^-^f^ OT