IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 15695 of 1991 Date of Decision: September 14, 2011 Rao Shiv Rattan Singh and others …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Haryana 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. Mr. Kamal Sehgal, learned Addl. A.G., Haryana states that the land of all the petitioners have been released except that of petitioner No.2. It has further been stated that if petitioner No.2, makes a representation with regard to the portion, which has not been released, the same shall be considered sympathetically. The representation shall be made within a period of two months. Mr. C.B. Goel, learned counsel for the petitioners accepted the aforesaid statement. In view of the above, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such with liberty to petitioner No.2 to make a representation for reconsideration of his case for release of land which has not been released vide order dated 22.03.1999. Till the final decision is taken, petitioner No. 2, shall not be displaced. (M.M. KUMAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE September 14, 2011 Atul