IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.3331 of 1992 Date of Decision:06.04.2011 Yog Raj Singh ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR. Present: Nemo for the petitioner. Ms.Kirti Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.R.A.Yadav, Advocate, for respondent Nos.3 and 4. **** M EHINDER S INGH S ULLAR , J.(oral) As is evident from the record that the petitioner has preferred the present writ petition, challenging the election results dated 27.01.1992, by way of co-option of a woman Panch. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents have submitted that since the term of the indicated Gram Panchayat has already been expired, and, thereafter, many elections of the Gram Panchayat have been held, so this writ petition has become infructuous, which may be disposed of as such. The contention of the learned counsel for the respondents has considerable force. In this view of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of, as having become infructuous. April 06, 2011 (MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR) seema JUDGE