IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 111 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 29 OF 2008 MR. VAMAN R. NAIK ... Applicant Versus STATE (THROUGH LD. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR) AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Anthony D'Silva, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. W. Coutinho, Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.1. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 15th July, 2008 P.C.: Heard Shri A. D'Silva, the learned Counsel on behalf of the applicant/accused. He has placed reliance on the decision in the case of Dilip S. Dahanukar V/s. Kotak Mahindra Co. Ltd. & Anr. (2007 AIR SCW 2425), in support of his contention that the petitioner/accused may not be directed to deposit the entire amount of compensation, as ordered by both the Courts below. 2. Considering that this is a revision petition where there are two concurrent findings against the petitioner, the execution of the sentence is hereby stayed subject to the petitioner depositing before this Court the entire compensation of Rs. 5.20 lacs within a period of 4 weeks. In case the said amount is not deposited, the sentence imposed shall be executed without any further reference to the Court. Application disposed of. N. A. BRITTO, J. NH