^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR airi-glQ B^iH^" M.C.C. No. ?( ^ of(5oTQ)^^^ (Out ofW.P.(C) No.127 Qf2007) APPLICANTS Respondents 2(a) to 2(e) and 3(a) to 3(f) ^ ocv ^ r\\ :2) -:3) :4) :5) / :6) s7) /"' :8) :9) Smt. Ushabai, W/o. Deokishan Agrawal, aged 65 years, Deepak, S/o. aged 50 years, Sanjay, S/o. aged 45 years, Deokishan^ Deokishan^ Raju, S/o. Deokishan^ Agrawal, aged 42 years, 1 to 4 R/o. Main Road Jagdalpur Smt. Jyoti Agrawal, W/o. Shyam, aged 47 years, R/o. Purani Basti, Raipur Vijay Kumar, S/o. late Trilokinath Agrawal, aged 45 years, Businessman, Main Road Jagdalpur. Smt. Umabai Wd/o. Late Trilokinath Smt. Arun, D/o. Trilokinath Agrawal, aged 55 years, R/o. Purani Basti, Raipur Smt. Bina, D/o. Trilokinath Agrawal, aged 53 years, R/o. Purani Basti, Raipur .>pO) Smt. Shashi, D/o. Trilokinath Agrawal, aged 50 years, R/o. Purani Basti, Raipur <<^ : 11) Smt. Munni @ Madhu, D/o. Trilokinath Agrawal, aged 47 years, R/o. Purani Basti, Raipur Versus NON-APPLICANTS :1) Petitioner & Resp. No.4(a) to 4 & 5(a) to 5(c) :2) Smt. Purnimabai @ Punnibai Agrawal, W/o. Late BN Agrawal, aged 85 years, C/o. Dr. Pratap Agrawal, Advocate, Main Road Jagdalpur-494001. Udainarayan, S/o. Ayodhyaprasad, aged 75 years, R/o. Main Road Jagdalpur—494001 :3) Krishnagopal, S/o. Late Bhanuprasad, aged 75 years, :4) Madangopal, S/o. Late Bhanuprasad, aged 65 years, :5) Ramgopal, S/o. Late Bhanuprasad, aged 60 years, :6) Smt. Chandrawati, Wd/o. late Saligram, aged 77 years, :7) Smt. Suruj Bai, W/o.not known, aged 67 years, :8) Munnibai, W/o.not known, aged 60 years, :9) Smt. Geeta, W/o.not known, aged 55 years, fc : 10) Smt. (^atri» W/o.not known, aged 52 years, . : 11) Smt. Prabha, W/o.not known, aged 50 years, Non-applicants 3 to 11 through Madangopal Agrawal, Mahavir Photocopiers, Lili Chowk, Raipur 492001 APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION/RBCALLING OF ORDER IN W.P.(C) No.127 of 2007 DATED 18.03.2011 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C.No. 318 of2011 ^ APPLICANTS Smt. Ushabai & others VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS : Smt. Pumimabai @ Punnibai & others (Application for modificatibn/recallmg oforder dated 18.03,2011 passedmW.P.CC) No. 127 of 2007) fSB: Hon'ble Mr. N.K. Asarwal, J.) Present : Shri HB Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Sanjay S Agrawal, Advocate for respondent No. 2. ORALORDER (Passedon 13.06.2011) 1. Shri HB Agrawal, leamed Sr. counsel appearing for the applicants submits, this court vide order dated 18.03.2011 dismissed respondent's petition however liberty was granted to file fresh application under Order 1 Rule 10 ofCPC supported with necessaty documents, therefore, the trial court is bent upon to allow respondent's application filed by misinterpreting this court's order and therefore the order inipugned needs modification. 2. On the other hand, Shri Sanjay S Agrawal, leamed counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 would submit : the trial court will certainly pass the order on its own merits in accordance with law and it is incorrect to say trial court is bent upon to allow respondent's application. Sahu ^- ^ Having heard leamed counsel appearing for the parties and having perused the order impugned, I do not find any substance in the petition. The trial court will certainly pass the order on its own ments in accordance with law after considering every aspects ofthe matter without being influenced by any ofthe observations made by this court in its order dated 18.03.2011. With the above observation, this petition is disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge