IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4379 of 2011 SATYENDRA DUSADH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3/ 24.3.2011 Heard. The misuse of privilege of bail by the petitioner is for a period of about seventeen years. However, the report submitted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, who is seized with the S.T. No. 78 of 1990 / 104 of 2009 arising out of Son Nagar Rail P.S. Case no. 12 of 1989 indicates that charges are not being framed in want of the case diary, which is not being made available in spite of reminders. In the above circumstances, let petitioner Satyendra Dusadh be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, FTC IV, Aurangabad in the above mentioned sessions trial subject to the following conditions: (i) both the bailors shall be the family members of the petitioner; (ii) the court below shall explain to the petitioner the necessity of his appearance before the court on all dates even if there is no actual purpose to be fulfilled or achieved; (iii) if there is specific direction to the petitioner to remain physically present, the petitioner shall never avoid it and any 2 instance of it shall be sufficient for cancelling the bond of the petitioner and remanding him to custody; (iv) if any compelling circumstance appears making it not possible for the petitioner to attend the court, reason there for shall be shown to the court below, then only the petitioner shall be allowed to be represented by his counsel. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)