IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 3609 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.5.2010. Dinesh ....Petitioner Versus Neetu and another ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BINDAL, J **** Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated March 30, 2010 passed by the learned Court below whereby the application filed by the petitioner seeking interim custody of his minor-daughter Rishika has been dismissed, though granting him visiting rights. Without referring to the merits of the controversy as the same may prejudice the case of either of the parties and considering the fact that the dispute in the present case is regarding the custody of a child of a tender age, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the main petition itself positively by September 30, 2010, by granting appropriate opportunities to both the parties even though with short adjournments. The revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. (RAJESH BINDAL) 26.5.2010. JUDGE Reema