1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 302 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3767 OF 2009 Shri Sunil Ramchandra Patil ... Applicant vs. Smt. Kamal Sunil Patil & Anr. ... Respondent Mr. Dushyant S. Pagare, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. A.B.Satpute, Advocate, for respondent no.1. Mrs. M.H.Mhatre, APP, for the State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 25th June, 2010. P.C. 1. With consent of the learned Counsel for both the parties, the Application is allowed and Criminal Application No.3767 of 2009 is hereby restored to file. Application stands disposed of. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3767 OF 2009 Shri Sunil Ramchandra Patil ... Applicant vs. Smt. Kamal Sunil Patil & Anr. ... Respondent Mr. Dushyant S. Pagare, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. A.B.Satpute, Advocate, for respondent no.1. Mrs. M.H.Mhatre, APP, for the State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J. DATE : 25th June, 2010. P.C. 1. The applicant and respondent No.1, who are the original accused and complainant respectively, are present before the Court along with their Counsel. The parties have filed the consent terms marked "X" for identification. The learned counsel for the parties identified the parties as well as their signatures. The parties admit the contents. The respondent No.1 was wife of the present applicant and their disputes before the Family Court have been finally resolved amicably. 2. In view of these circumstances and the consent terms, the proceedings in Criminal Application No.175 of 2003 under Section 498A pending before the 3 Metropolitan Magistrate,34th Court and the proceedings in Criminal Case No. 1004/2003 under Section 494 IPC pending before the JMFC,Nashik, are hereby quashed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)