*1* ss.529.09 kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.529 OF 2009 State Bank of India. ..Plaintiff -Versus- Bhausaheb B. Kamble. ..Defendant .......... Prasad Das i/b Goenka Law Associates, for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant. .......... CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 08th October, 2010. P.C. 1 The State Bank of India has filed this suit to recover the amount as sought in the prayer clause on the basis of the written contract as evidenced by the documents such as personal loan application, arrangement letter, personal loan agreement duly signed by the Defendant. The Plaintiff states that the Defendant has failed to appear despite receipt of a writ of summons. Further he has availed of the loan which was a personal loan and has acknowledged his liability. Since the suit is filed on the basis of the above written documents and the Defendant resides in Mumbai, I am satisfied that the suit is maintainable as a summary suit and this Court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit. The claim of the Plaintiff is not barred by limitation. 2 In such circumstances, there will be decree as prayed. The Advocate’s costs will be computed as per rules. Refund of the Court fees as per rules. All original documents are taken on record. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)