~3/' HIGK COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WR!T PETITSON (81 N0. 72S2 of 2007 Ghiirau son of Puaaii, aged about 60 vears, Resident of vfllage Bagrumnala, Tahsil Nagri, District Dhamtari(CG) v 1 State of ChIiattisgaA, through fhe Secietary, Public Works Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 3 The Siiperuitending Engmeer, Public Works Departaieiit, Raipui Division, RaipurfCG) 3 The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Dhamtari, Divisioa DhamtarifCG) 4 The Sub Divisional Officer, PubUc Works Department, Division Nagri, Disuict Dhamtari(CG) Writ Petition uaderArtlcle 386 P?the Consiitutioa of Sndlal Sbri P.P. Sabil, counsei for the petitioner. SbriAjay Dwivedi; Panel i<iwyer for thp. State on advance copy. 107.12.2007) ,J. Heard. I^eamed counsel for the petitioTier submits that a pen'naiient Gang-inan is to be i-etired at tbe age of 62 yeai's in accordance with the CliJi^i.UisQarh Shaskiisa Sevak (Adhivarshiki- Ayi.i) Adhiniyam ^ 967 read with Piindainenta] Rziles, 56. He al&o subinits ttaat the point raised has been flefided by t1'us Court in hatch ofinatters i.e. W.P.No. 108/2005 anc! manv other r-i 5 ^ W.P.(S'jNo. 7252.0f2007 counected mattera on 04.01.2007, reported in 3007 (3) C.G.L.J. 29 {Gowlnd Ss others Vs. State of C.G.) and fliis matter is squarely covered by that decision; which may be disposed ofon the sanie terms. Leamed counsel tor the Stete fairly agreea tl'iat this niatter is covered by the said decision. However, he siibraits fhat in SOITIC niattei's the State has filed writ appeals. Unless some interim. orier is passed, me-i-ely on accoufiit of fiUng of the xvrit appeal, heanng of tiiis writ petition cannot be kcpl. in abeyance, when the matter is squarely covered by the said judgTnent. In the resiilt, tllis petition is allowed. It is djsposed of in tenns of t-h.e order riateri 04.1.2007 passed in W.P. No. 108/2005 and oflier connected matters. No order as to costs. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge sunita \. ^A-