SB Crlmb No.5344/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B.CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.5344/2010. Birdhilal Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 21/6/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ VJ Shri Liyakat Ali for the petitioner. Shri Mahendra Meena Public Prosecutor for State. ****** Heard learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been made an accused for alleged offence only because he happens to be friend of co-accused Lalit with whom, prosecutrix Ms.Hemu alias Himanchali elope. They were classmates studying in the XIth standard, who fell in love with each other and remained away from home for 2½ months. He has been made an accused only because of that reason. He is in jail for last one month, investigation is complete and no recovery is to be made from the petitioner. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. SB Crlmb No.5344/10. 2 Considering the submissions made at the bar, the nature of accusation, the materials on record and all other facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Birdhilal S/o Shri Lakha shall be released on bail in FIR No.28/2010 P.S. Keshoraypatan, District Bundi for offence u/Ss.363, 366, 376, 120-B IPC and Section 3 of the SC/ST Act on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing until conclusion of the trial. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), VJ. anil