PETITIONERS : 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) N0. 330 OF 2004 / :J‘J Bharti Cellular Limited A company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its Registered office at Qutab Ambiene, H—5/l2, Mehrauli Road, New Delhi 110 030. Having a Local office also at: Navbharat, Udyog Bhavan, Ringroad No. 1, Telibandha, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Mr. Raju Thomas, Senior Engineer, Bharti Cellular Limited, Navbharat, Udyog Bhavan, Ringroad No. l, Telibandha, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS : 1. X 8) Municipal Corporation of Rajnandgaon Through:- The Commissioner RAJNANDGAON a ¢“(CHHATTISGARH). 1. Particulars of the Petitioners: As mentioned in the cause title above. 2. Particulars of the Respondents: As mentioned in the cause title above. 3. Particulars of the Orders against which this petition is made: TITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/22, OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA / w °" E XI—HC-22 Wm WW may? ‘ fawg Ww Em W M i <N k. maizw? W § fa?m saw ”613m arm %: 3W em 17.02 .2004 Shri S.S~. Rajput, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Anand Shukla, co, sel for respondent no. 1 Shri Sanjay K. Agraw , Deputy Advocate General for respondent no.2. Learned Counsel for t e petitioners submitted that an application (I.A.No.1110/20 4) for deleting tli'e name of State/respondent no.2 has en filed. Prayer not opposed. Application is allowed. Name of the State/respondent No.2 be deleted subject to co t of Rs. 100/— Counsel for the partie submits that the application is pending, which has not yet een decided. It is also pointed by respondent no.2 that no re esentation has been made. Shri Shukla, appearing for resp dent no.1/Corporation submits/ that straight way this petitio has been tiled. Counsel for the petiti ner submits that in view of the notice, they apprehend that he towertmay be dismantled. Under the facts and ircumstances of the case, it is directed». that if'the petitione makes a representation and/or submits an application for ant of N.O.C. and pay prescribed l \fee as per the rules, within 1 days from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent Corporation expeditiously on its own erits i‘n accordance with law. -9, [View 3mm i A na” W “ J \ V ‘ gigijgg ‘ WEWWW , 7/? %W&;mi%am i Parties are at liberty to avail remedy under the law if any cause of action $¢t3§f§§uwrvivee f ‘ It is aleo directed that dismantling Will not be made till i the decision on the application/representation. With the direction/observation aforesaid, this petition t stands disposed of. 1 In View Voi‘ the above: order, I.A.No:904 of 2004 and M.W.P’\340 of 2004 stand disposed of. 7‘ \ V '7 C.c. as per rules. / Sdl- I Fakhruddm x Judge