*1* wp.30.31.32.33.34. kps I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.30 OF 2010 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.31 OF 2010 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.32 OF 2010 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.33 OF 2010 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.34 OF 2010 Moosa Kadir Dadan. (WP 30/10) Ibrahim K. Dadan. (WP 31/10) Mohd. Takir Mohd. Takki (WP 32/10) Bashir Bankapur (WP 33/10) Kamal Takir Mohd. Takir (WP 34/10) ..Petitioners -Versus- Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others. ..Respondents .... Mr.S.A. Sawant for the Petitioners. Vidya S. Gharpure, for the Respondent/BMC. .... CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, CJ & S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date : 26th July, 2010. P.C. 1 In these five separate petitions, the five Petitioners have challenged the impugned order dated 09.02.2009 passed by the Deputy Municipal Commissioner, Zone-II of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and have prayed that the Petitioners be provided with respective areas as mentioned in the prayer clause as per the prevailing policy of the *2* wp.30.31.32.33.34. project affected persons of the Respondent/ Corporation. 2 By the order dated 13.04.2010 this Court directed the Petitioners to appear before the Deputy Municipal Commissioner to take decision in the matter. Accordingly, the Petitioners had appeared and by order dated 17.06.2010 the Deputy Municipal Commissioner has rejected the Petitioners’ claim for additional areas of 1200 sq.feet jointly. 3 The learned counsel for the Petitioners sought leave to amend the petitions to challenge the above order dated 17.06.2010. However, having regard to the fact that the challenge to the said order will require the petitioners to place new facts on record which are proposed to be controverted by the Respondents; we are of the view that instead of granting leave to amend the petitions as prayed for, it would be proper to dispose of these petitions with liberty to the Petitioners to file one petition of all five petitioners as they wish to challenge the common order dated 17.06.2010. The Petitions are, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to a file fresh common petition for challenging the order dated 17.06.2010. CHIEF JUSTICE S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.