IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13126 of 2008 SARALA DEVI & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2/ 14.5.2010 After having heard Shri Amrit Abhijat, learned counsel for the petitioners and having perused the long draft of the written report, it could not be said that the offence could not be tried at Supaul in the light of the fact that the cause could be at Kolkata and the effect may be at Supaul or the cause may be at Supaul and effect may be at Kolkata. In such situation, principles laid down under section 178 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall apply. The petition is dismissed. Anil/ ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)