IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10266 of 2011 Ram Naresh Singh @ Rai aged about 59 years, son of late Ram Ekbal, resident of village-Bihiyan, Sadasi Tola, P.S. Bihiyan, Dist. Ara ----Petitioner. Versus 1. The Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road Patna. 2. The Chief Engineer, Bihar State Electricity Board, Ara. 3. The Superintending Engineer, Bihar State Electricity Board, Buxar. 4. The Executive Engineer, Bihar State Electricity Board, Buxar 5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Bihar State Electricity Board, Dumraon, Buxar. 6. The Junior Engineer, Power Sub Station, Brahmpur, Buxar. --Respondents. ---------------------------------- 03 10.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Nobody appears on behalf of the respondent State as well as the Bihar State Electricity Board (for short ‘the Board’). As per the averments made in the writ petition the petitioner was working under the Power Sub Station, Brahmpur under the Bihar State Electricity Board as Helper. He claims that the service record prepared in respect of the petitioner discloses his date of birth as 08.06.1951. Petitioner has asserted that considering the said date of birth he should have been superannuated w.e.f. 30.06.2011 on attaining the age of 60 years but the respondents did not permit him to work w.e.f. December, 2010. Petitioner, thus, filed the present writ petition seeking appropriate order(s)/ writ(s) directing the respondent authority of the Board to allow him to continue in service until he attains the age of 60 years. The pleadings made in the writ petition are not supported by any document inasmuch as the petitioner has not attached the order of his appointment as Helper. In absence of appropriate pleadings supported by documents, no relief can be 2 granted to the petitioner. Petitioner ought to have approached the competent authority of the respondent Board ventilating his grievance but without doing so he has filed the present writ petition without enclosing any document in support of the pleadings. Petitioner, if so advised, may approach the authority by filing appropriate representation supported by all relevant documents. This Court observes that if any such representation is filed within a reasonable time, the authority shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law. The application is dismissed but with liberty aforesaid. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )