1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ORDER S.B. Cr. Misc Bail Application No. 7619/2010 Banwari Vs State of Rajasthan through PP 20.8.2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI Mr Pradeep Mathur - for the petitioner Mr GS Rathore – for JVVNL Mr Amit Poonia - Public Prosecutor BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the matter. To show his bona fide, petitioner will deposit a sum of Rs.5000/- with the trial court within fifteen days of his release which amount may be disbursed subject to the final outcome of the trial. Petitioner undertakes to maintain good conduct during period of bail, if granted. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be granted bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. After considering rival submissions of the parties and 2 without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Banwari may be enlarged on bail under section 439 CrPC in FIR No. 111/2010 registered at Police Station – Kanwas, Kota for offence under Section/s 136 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. It is, however, made clear that if the petitioner is found committing same or similar offence or any other type of offence during the period of bail then not only the prosecution would be at liberty to seek cancellation of this bail order but the Investigating Officer is also directed to inform about the same to this court if any case is registered. Copy of this order may be sent to the Investigating Officer concerned for necessary information and compliance if so required. 3 Since petitioner has undertaken to deposit a sum of Rs.5000/- with the trial court within a period of fifteen days from the date of his release, it is made clear that if petitioner fails to comply above undertaking this bail order shall stands cancelled automatically without further reference to this court. The amount so deposited by the petitioner would be disbursed subject to final outcome of the trial. (MN BHANDARI), J. bnsharma