IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1481 of 2009 BRAJ KISHORE PRASAD SINHA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 02. 12.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The writ petition was dismissed for non- prosecution on 29.3.2005 and the restoration application has been filed on 29.4.2009. For reasons mentioned in paragraph-3 of the application that of the two counsels, one came to be appointed as a Judicial Magistrate and other shifted his practice to the Jharkhand High Court, the Court considers it prudent to restore the writ petition. The question of delay in filing the Restoration application and its effect on the relief claimed are left open for consideration at the time of hearing the writ petition on merits. Let a copy of the present order be kept on the records of the writ application also for appropriate consideration at the hearing of the writ application. The application stands allowed. P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)