IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 947 OF 2009 Sunil Nilkanth Sathaey ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent --- Shri A.P. Mundargi, Senior Counsel i/b. Sudatta Patil for Applicant Shri Rajesh More, APP for State ---- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 17TH MARCH, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and the Learned APP for the State. 2. The Assistant Police Inspector Vijay G. Kumbhar has filed his affidavit in reply. In the affidavit in reply, in paragraph 5, he has stated that no fresh FIR has been filed against the present Applicant. The Applicant has an apprehension that he may be arrested on a fresh FIR being filed in respect of the allegations made in the earlier complaints and he may be arrested for the said offences though an interim anticipatory bail has been granted to him by the Sessions Court. The said apprehension has been expressed in view of a newspaper report which had appeared in daily 'Dainik Pudhari' dated 24.2.2009. 3. The learned APP for the State has submitted that the Investigating officer has not made any such statement which has appeared in the said report. 4. In view of the statement made in the affidavit in reply y the Assistant Police Inspector, since no fresh FIR has been filed so far, the interim order passed by this Court dated 27th February, 2009 is confirmed and Sangli City Police Station shall give 72 hours notice to the present Applicant excluding Saturday and Sunday that in the event, any complaint is filed against the present Applicant in respect of similar complaints which are filed against Quest Net Company for the offences punishable under section 420 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 3,4 and 5 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Banning Act, 1978 which are registered vide C.R. No. 219/2008 registered at Sangli City Police Station. 7. Application is, accordingly, disposed of. V.M. KANADE J.