IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN TUESDAY, THE 24TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 5TH PHALGUNA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 511 of 2001 ------------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15/02/2001 IN CMP 616/2000 IN CC.27/1999 OF THE ENQUIRY COMMR. & SPL. JUDGE, THRISSUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER/ACCUSED: -------------------------------------------- WILSON J.MANGALAM, S/O.M.M.JOHN, MANGALAMTHIL HOUSE, PULIYANNOOR, PALAI. BY ADV. SRI.B.RAMAN PILLAI SRI.C.HARIKUMAR RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, ERNAKULAM. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.T.K.VIPINDAS THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.S.GOPINATHAN, J. ------------------------------------------- Crl.R.P.No.511 of 2001-A ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 24th day of February, 2009 ORDER The revision petitioner is assailing an order dismissing a petition to discharge the revision petitioner under Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Today when the revision petition came up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner that the trial court proceeded with the trial and the petitioner was acquitted and hence this revision petition has become infructuous. In the result, this revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE vns