HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA Writ Petition No.3003 of 2007 ORDER:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Services-III for respondent Nos.1 and 2, and the learned counsel for the third respondent. The petitioner herein is the applicant before the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short ‘the Tribunal’) in O.A.No.659 of 2007 filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, wherein he sought to assail the correctness of the reversion proceedings, dated 29.01.2007. Though several grounds were urged on behalf of the petitioner on merits, the Tribunal without going to the same, rejected the request of the petitioner by its order, dated 12.02.2007, mainly on the ground that the petitioner has got an effective alternative remedy of regular appeal and accordingly dismissed the same. Hence, the present writ petition. Briefly stated the facts which ultimately cropped up the cause, are that the impugned proceedings, dated 29.01.2007, were issued by the District Collector (Tribal Welfare), Karimnagar, wherein the petitioner was reverted from the post of HWO, Grade-I to HWO, Grade- II, in view of the orders passed by the Tribunal in O.A.No.487 of 2005, dated 18.11.2006, while promoting the third respondent to the post of HWO, Grade-I. However, subsequently, it appears, as against the orders in O.A.No.487 of 2005, the Government filed W.P.No.8383 of 2007 and the same was allowed by a Division Bench of this Court on 04.06.2007 and therefore, it is the case of the petitioner that the very basis for reversion of the petitioner is no longer exists, that there is no warrant for such reversion and that the third respondent is not entitled to be promoted vis-à-vis the claim of the petitioner. Be that as it may, apparently the reversion proceedings, dated 29.01.2007, makes it clear that the same were issued pursuant to the orders in O.A.No.487 of 2005, dated 18.11.2006, which were set aside by a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.8383 of 2007 by order, dated 04.06.2207. Hence, in the absence of any order being in force as per law, the very proceedings get totally vitiated and shakened. Therefore, the impugned proceedings, dated 29.01.2007, do not hold any water. In the circumstances, the writ petition is allowed and O.A.No.659 of 2007 on the file of the Tribunal is allowed by setting aside the impugned proceedings, dated 29.01.2007. We make it clear that respondent Nos.1 and 2 are at liberty to pass fresh orders, if warrants in the exigencies, in accordance with law. No costs. ______________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) __________________ (B.N.RAO NALLA, J) Date:08.09.2010 VGB