IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3319 of 2011 VINAY RAVIDAS SON OF LATE SUPAT RAVIDAS @ SUKHPATI RAVIDAS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE+ P.O.+P.S.- SONO, DISTRICT- JAMUI. ------------ PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 10.03.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the uncle of the husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is of demand of dowry and torture. The marriage took place three years prior to the occurrence. The general accusation, against the entire family including the husband, is of throttling the neck of the victim. The specific allegation is against the husband. Annexure-2 has been brought on record to suggest that there was partition between the petitioner and family of the husband. The accusation was found false and the final form was submitted against the petitioner. 2 Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 57/2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)