IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24131 of 2008 SHAMBHOO KUMAR YADAV & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 13.8.2008 Heard. The recovery of the motor-cycle appears from a place which could not make it sure that it was recovered from the conscious possession of any person. Similarly, the possession of the cellular phone set by the petitioner has been explained by submitting that it was a too common an article to be said to be a theft property and in absence of evidence, the identity of the same could not be said to be a theft property. Regard being had to the allegation and the contention , let petitioners, namely, Shambhoo Kumar Yadav and Dinesh Kumar Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. case no.309 of 2007. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )