:1: IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 2286 OF NO. 2286 OF NO. 2286 OF 1984 1984 1984 Shirin N. Lokhandwala & Ors. ... Plaintiffs. V/s. Munavarali Adamali Rangwala & Ors. ... Defendants. None for the Plaintiffs. None for the Defendants. ..... CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J. 27TH 27TH 27TH JANUARY 2009. JANUARY 2009. JANUARY 2009. P.C. P.C. P.C. : : : . It is stated that the office notice could not be served as the Plaintiffs are not residing at address mentioned in the cause title. 2. It further appears that the Advocate for the Plaintiffs has been discharged after the Plaintiffs were given due notice by him. In these circumstances and when no other details are placed on record, it will not be proper for this Court to wait endlessly until the Plaintiffs come forward to proceed with the Suit. Despite notice they have not come forward. None of the four Plaintiffs are present in Court. Their Advocate has already been discharged. In these circumstances, the Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution. (S.C. (S.C. (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.) DHARMADHIKARI,J.)