c. -CTO 'l ^•g^..l IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH ^rz^ WRIT PETITION (S) NO." OF 2006 PETITIONER: L^/--^@" <.^8^' /iV.-*" Smt. Suranjana Rawat, D/o Shri S.M. Agrawal, Aged 35 years, Presently posted and working as Lecturer (English), Govemment Natwar Multi Higher Secondary School, Raigarh (CG). •;•• ^\^ •s^" ^ Versus RESPONDENTS ^s ^"-^ 5? .^'^' -^ ^" / 1. State ofChhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Education, D.K.S. Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (-1. District Education Officer, Dist. Raigarh (CG). 3. Block Education Officer, Raigarh, Dist. Raigarh (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ENfDIA ~\- KT6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH AT KELASPUR W. P.(s)hk>. 5654 of 2006 Petitwner Smt. Suranjang Rawat Versus Respondents Stnte of ChhattiS9arh & others Shste Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri. Shri Rajendra Tryarthi, Advocate for -the Petitioner. Smt. Anju Ahuja, t)y. 6ovt. Advocdte for the respondents/Stote. ^ OR&ER (26th October. 2006) 1. Learned counsel dppeaa'ing for -the petH-ioner submits thoit while N»rkin9as Lecturer, the petitioner has gone on traininj| to improve her qualifications on her own expenses <md acquired B. Ed. Exomination Certificort-e on 20.12.1996 from 6uru Shasicbs Universi-ty, Bilaspur (Annexire P/2). 2. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, Kie petitwner is entitled to two advunce mcrenients in V'WH of the decisfon of this Court in the case of Yofihwflnt Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. AAunicipal Corporution, burg and anolher {2006 (11) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court 'vn the case of Yaahunnt Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Ourg ond (mothw (5upra), came to 1fie conclusion that the teachers, who had obtouned B. Ed. Extimination Certifkate on his own expenses, are covered by ^^^ 1he circutar dated 24.12.98 (Annexure P/3) issued by Ihe St<ite Sovemment of AAadhya PracteA 3. Leamed counset for 1t»e petitioner further subnuts -that the facts and question of l<n» involved in -the present case are squarely covered by decision of •this Court in the cose of Ycahwant Kumar Bharodwaj Vs. Municipal Corporcrtfon, Durg and anolher (Supra), to uihich teamed counsel appearing for -the reqiondwits fairly concedes and cgrees «w1h •ttie awrment nwde by learned counsel oppearng for Ihe petitioner. 4. Accordingly. the writ petitwn is ullowed m terms of Ihe order passed in the cose of Yashwant Kumor Bhcradwoj Vs. Municipul Corporation, Qwg and ano-ther (5upra), subject to verification of the fact os to whether the petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examinotion Certificate on her own expenses w not. No order 03 t0 COStS. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Bablu