- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.449 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.449 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.449 OF 2005 Vilas @ Babu Bhaguram Shirke ...Petitioner vs. State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Ms Sonia Miskin (Adv.appointed) Ms M.H.Mhatre,A.P.P. for State CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 24,2005 : AUGUST 24,2005 : AUGUST 24,2005 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for State. 2. The learned A.P.P. for State pointed out that the application made by the Petitioner for grant of parole leave on 15th July 2005 has been forwarded to the Divisional Commissioner for consideration. The learned A.P.P. has produced for my perusal the report submitted by the Superintendent, Nasik Road Central Jail. The said report records that earlier application made by the Petitioner on 18th April 2004 for grant of parole leave was rejected by order dated 2nd December 2004. The grievance made in this Petition relates to the said application dated 18th April 2004. As the said application is rejected by the Competent Authority and as a fresh kapplication is already made no order can be passed in this Petition. Hence, Petition is rejected. - 2 - 3. The Competent Authority will decide the fresh application made by the Petitioner on 15th July 2005 in accordance with law. The said application shall be decided as expeditiously as possible. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE