IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.15569 of 2006 ============================================ 1.NAND KISHORE GUPTA, S/O LATE BHAGWATI PRASAD, R/O VILLAGE TATHWANANDPUR, P.S BAIRIYA DISTRICTS WEST CHAMPARAN. 2.PARAS THAKUR, S/O SRI INDRASEN THAKUR, R/O VILLAGE MHODI SUDHAR, P.S. GOPALPUR, DISTRICTS WEST CHAMPARAN. 3.DHARAM RAJ PRASAD RAVI, S/O LATE GHOGI RAM, R/O VILLAGE SISWA, P.S SHIKARPUR, DISTRICTS WEST CHAMPARAN. 4.RAVINDRA KISHORE GIRI, S/O SRI PARMESHWAR GIRI, R/O VILLAGE PARSA, P.S. BHANUAPUL, DISTRICTS WEST CHAMPARAN. 5.PRABHU NAT RAM, S/O SRI PRAYAG RAM, R/O VILLAGE KHADA TOLA KUNJALHI, PS.NAUTAN, DISTRICTS WEST CHAMPARAN. 6.BIRENDRA KUMAR RAM, S/O MANU RAM, R/O VILLAGE BARWAT LACH, P.S.BETTIAH (MUFFASIL), DISTRICTS WEST CHAMPARAN. 7.RAJ NANDAN KUMAR, S/O SRI JAMUNA PRASAD RAI, R/O VILLAGE SIRISIYA, PS. CHANPATIYA, DISTRICTS WEST CHAMPARAN. 8.DINA NATH DIWAKAR, S/O SRI RAMADHAR RAM, R/O VILLAGE SISWA, P.S. SHIKARPUR, DISTRICTS WEST CHAMPARAN. 9.PREM CHANDRA RAM, S/O SRI DHUKI RAM, R/O VILLAGE MADHURI, P.S. BETTIAH, DISTRICTS WEST CHAMPARAN. ……………….. Petitioner/s(s) Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR. 2.THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, NIRMAN BHAWAN, NEW DELHI. 3.THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY, HEALTH SERVICES, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4.THE STATE LEPROSY OFFICER, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 5.THE STATE LEPROSY SOCIETY, BIHAR, PATNA THROUGH IT’S THE CHAIRMAN, THE COMMISSIONER, HEALTH SERVICES, BIHAR, PATNA. 6.THE DISTRICT LEPROSY SOCIETY, WEST CHAMPARAN THROUGH IT’S THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BETTIAH. 7.THE DISTRICT LEPROSY OFFICER, WEST CHAMPARAN, BETTIAH. ……………….Respondent/s(s) ============================================ 2 03/ 14.07.2011 No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present. From the reading of the writ petition and the counter affidavit, it becomes clear that the grievance of the petitioner as with regard to payment of admissible amount of honorarium stands redressed, inasmuch as, in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no. 7, The District Leprosy Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah, dated 14.02.2008, it has been asserted that the admissible arrear for the petitioner from 01.10.1999 to 31.03.2000 has been paid by bankdraft. It has also been explained in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 1 to 6 that the traveling allowances were also paid to the petitioners as per the Government norms. That being so, this application by turn of events as explained and narrated in the counter affidavit has become infructuous and is, accordingly, dismissed. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J)