wp1796.11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1796 OF 2011 Dilip S/o Maruti Tidke, R/o-Beach Palm Society, Palm Beach Road, Sector No.4, Nerul, New Mumbai. ...PETITIONER. VERSUS 1) Prakash S/o Maroti Tidke, R/o-Plot No.11-A, Godatir Nerul, Sector No.1, New Mumbai and others. ...RESPONDENTS. ... Shri.S.S. Choudhari Advocate h/f. Shri. Y.S. Choudhari Advocate for Petitioner. Shri.A.G. Talhar Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4. ... CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL, J. DATE : 2ND DECEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. wp1796.11 2 2. The Petitioner challenges an order dated 1st March 2011, passed below Exhibit 84 in the proceedings of Regular Civil Suit No.561 of 2004. 3. The objection raised by the learned counsel Shri. Choudhari to the impugned order is, that after impounding the document, the trial Court ought to have forwarded the same to the Collector for taking appropriate steps in accordance with the provisions of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. Instead, the trial Court has observed the procedure to be adopted by the Collector, Ahmednagar. 4. In the facts of the case and in view of the provisions of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, I observe that the Collector would deal with the matter strictly in accordance with the provisions of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, as the subject document was impounded by the Court and forwarded wp1796.11 3 to the Collector. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] asb/DEC11