1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION (STAMP) NO.11262 OF 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1591 OF 2004 1. Vinayak Tukaram Barve & anr. Applicants vs. 1. Union of India & ors. Respondents Dr.V.K.Choudhari for the applicants. CORAM : R. M. LODHA & R. S. MOHITE,JJ. DATED : 3rd May 2005 P.C. Dr.V.K.Choudhari, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in compliance of the order dated 26.04.2005, civil application bearing stamp no.11262/2005 has been made for deletion of respondent no.4 from array of parties. 2. We find that office does not put up the note correctly. Despite that the civil application has already been made by the petitioners on 30.04.2005 for deletion of respondent no.4 from array of parties, the office has reported that no application has been made by the advocate for the petitioner as yet. It is very strange that on 26.04.2005 one week’s time was granted to the advocate for the petitioners for making the application yet the office prepared the note on 2 29.4.2005/30.4.2005 much before the expiry of one week. The Registrar (Judicial) is directed to hold the enquiry as to how the concerned official could prepare the note on 29.4.2005/30.4.2005 stating that no application has been made by the advocate for the petitioners when by the order dated 26.4.2005 one week time was granted to the advocate for the petitioner. The lapse like this is not isolated or unusual. The Registrar (Judicial) shall take corrective steps and also take necessary action against the erring official. 3. The civil application for deletion of respondent no.4 from array of parties is granted. The name of respondent no.4 is ordered to be struck off in the cause title by the office immediately. 4. Civil application stands disposed of. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) (R.S. (R.S. (R.S. MOHITE,J.) MOHITE,J.) MOHITE,J.)