IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5696 of 2009 Date of Decision: August 26, 2010 Shisha Singh …Petitioner Versus Sahab Singh and others. …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH. 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Kharab, Advocate, for the respondents. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) In the present petition, order under challenge is dated 05.09.2009 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Assandh, District Karnal, whereby the learned trial Court has directed the plaintiff to pay ad-valoram C.R. 5696 of 2009 court fee on the amount of sale consideration of the sale deed in question. Admittedly and undisputedly, neither the plaintiff nor the predecessor-in-interest was party to the sale deed in question. Both the learned counsel stated that order dated 05.09.2009 be quashed and matter be remitted to the learned trial Court to dispose of the question of payment of court fee in the light of the judgment dated 03.05.2010 of this Court in Civil Revision No. 22 of 2009. In view of the statement hereinabove, order impugned is quashed. The learned trial Court is directed to decide the issue of payment of court fee in the light of the judgment dated 03.05.2010 of this Court in C.R. No. 22 of 2009. August 26, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2