: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2333 OF 2004 Mr.Jairaj H. Kalyani .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Home Dept. & Ors... Respondents Mr.U.N.Tayade for Petitioner Mr.B.H.Mehta, APP for State CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & P.V.KAKADE, JJ. DATE : 10TH MARCH, 2005. P.C. 1. The learned APP states that necessary protection in terms of the order of the Court is being provided to the Petitioner and the same would be renewed from time to time in accordance with the provisions of law. He has also made it clear that the protection is in accordance with the provisions of law and subject to the payment of charges. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner has stated that the order of the Court directing the Respondents to provide police protection : 2 : does not speak about any payment of charges. Undoubtedly the order does not speak about any payment of charges nor there is any direction to provide police protection contrary to the provisions of law, which means that the protection is to be provided in accordance with the provisions of law which means that the petitioner would be liable to pay the charges for such protection being provided to the petitioner. 2. With this observation , while accepting the statement of the learned APP, nothing further is required to be done in the matter. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.) (P.V.Kakade, J.)