1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7419 OF 2009 Sheetal Shashikant Shinde & Ors. ...Petitioners vs. M/s.Nirman The Creation, through Proprietor Mr.Ganesh Shashikant Melawane ...Respondent Mr.U.P.Warunjikar for the petitioners Mr.Vishwanath Talkute for respondent CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : OCTOBER 6, 2009 P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners are the original plaintiffs. The plaintiffs have filed a suit for declaration that the agreement for development dated 17 th June 2007 and Power of Attorney executed by them in favour of the respondents are not binding on them. An application for temporary injunction made by the petitioners was rejected and in appeal the said order has been confirmed. These are the orders impugned in this petition. 2 The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are in possession of the structure in which they are running a printing press and the respondents cannot take law in their hands and dispossess the petitioners. He states that the structure of the petitioners was all throughout protected. 2 3 After having considered the submissions, I find no fault with the finding of fact recorded by both the courts below that there was correction deed executed on 12 th July 2007 by the petitioners which was duly registered and the petitioners had suppressed the execution of the correction deed. The perusal of the plaint shows that thee is no reference to the said correction deed in the plaint. As the petitioners are claiming an equitable and discretionary relief, no fault can be found with the impugned orders. Writ Petition is rejected. All contentions of the parties on merits are kept open. JUDGE