( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6545 OF 2010 Gendalal Bholaram Pardeshi Since deceased, by L.Rs. PETITIONERS VERSUS Ashokkumar Babulal Gupta RESPONDENT .... Mr. S.I. Nandode, advocate for the petitioners. .... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 17th August, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard counsel. 2. The petitioners’ application for calling the post master of Dhule main post office, alongwith the documents pertaining to money orders of year 1994-95 came to be rejected. The petitioners’ contention was that the postal receipts and acknowledgements (Exh-131 to Exh-139) were denied by the plaintiff (respondent) and, therefore, calling of such record was necessary. The trial Court noticed that in the witness list, the petitioners had not named the post master at the first available opportunity nor it was probable that such ( 2 ) old record could be maintained by the main post office. Secondly, the petitioner is at liberty to prove the documents by adducing further evidence or secondary evidence in order to prove the signatures of the plaintiff/respondent. The discretionary order is without any perversity and, therefore, the petition is dismissed. [V.R. KINGAONKAR] JUDGE NPJ/wp6545-10