C//;‘ mmk r. 04 (D IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH w.P.(S) No. €é78 12006 PETITIONERS 1,. Hira Lal Karsh, S/o Shri Duje Ram Karsh, aged about 36 Years it Assistant Teacher , Govt. Middle School , Birgahni (Champa) Block Baloda, Distt. Janjgir Chapma (C.G.) Sani Kumar Chandra. S/o. Shri Ram Dulare Chandra, aged about 35 Years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Girls Middle School — Sivni (Champa), Block Baloda Distt. Janjgir Chapma (C.G.) r 3 . lndra Singh Chandra, S/o Shri Gokul Prasad Chandra, aged about 35 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School Mukta Block Jaijaipur , Distt. Janjgir Chapma (C.G.) 4. Ram Dayal Dadsena, S/o Shri Firtu Ram Dadsena, aged about 36 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School' , Bharda Block Bamhnidih , Distt. Janjgir Chapma (C.G.) 5. Pawan Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri V Aghori Ram Sahu, aged about 36 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Hr.S. School, Choriya Block Bamhnidih , Distt. Janjgir Chapma (C.G.) ® Sant Ram Sahu, S/o Shri Kartik Ram Sahu, aged about 34 Years Assistant Teacher , Govt. Primary School , Darang Block Bamhnidih , Distt. Janjg‘ir Chapma (C.G.) Timan Lal Chandra, S/o Shri Bindu Lal Chandra, aged about 37 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary Schooi , Basantpur Block Bamhnidih , Distt. Janjgir Chapma (C.G.) Ann Kumar Pandey , 3/6 Shri Kaleshwar Pra‘sad Pandey, aged about 36 Years Barson Pratap Singh Gond, S/o Shri Upasu 10. Krishan Kumar Kashyap , S/o Shri S.R.Kashyap, aged about 36 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Primary School , Katra Block - 'Baloda, Distt. Janjgir Chapma (C.G.) Santosh Kumar Yadav,.S/o Shri Parmeshwar Prasad Yadav, aged about 36 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt.Hr. S. School, Birra Block - Bamhnidih, Distt. Janjgir Chapma (C.G.) . 1 1 . Govt. Primary School Block Navagarh, , Years Primary School Teacher, Baloda, Distt. , Birgahni (B) Janjgir Chapma 06 C53 12 Parmeshwar Rathore S/o Shri " Ayodya Prasad aged about 35 Years A55lstant Teacher, Govt.Glrls Middle School, Baradwar Block - Bamhnidih, Distt. Janjgir Chapma (CG) (13. Mohan Lal Yadav S/o Shn Botl Lal Yadav, aged about 36 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Sarher Block - Bamhnidih, Distt. Janjgir Chapma (C.G.) ‘ 14. Lav Kumar Khuiosik, S/o Shri Ram Jag , aged about 36 Years Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Bhaistara Block —— Akaltara, Distt. Janjgir Chapma (C.G.) VERSUS ,1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through — The Secretary Department of Education D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director,Pubiiclns’truction ,Chhattisgarh Govt. Raipur 'R ESPONDENTS 3. District Education Officer, Distt. Janjgir Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS, DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER The petitioner above named most respectfully submits as under:— XI-HC—78 EW,W,W w A§§2é€§§a a1 200 g WW(W) ) W$rf>ai$ mwm WWEWW‘ ém%wsn?m 08.1 2.2006 Shri A.S. Rajput, Iearned Shri Vinay Pandey, learn By this petition under i india, the petitioners seek a d increments and seniority on\ appointment in the light of the decision rendered by the iearned State Administrative Tribunal, Jab alpur in Original Application No. 1452/1998 (Harish Chandra Singh and others Vs. State of MP. and others) dated 31 .1 .2000 2. Learned counsel appear copy of the order dated 3rd Oct Petition (S) No. 5191/2006‘(H Chhattisgarh and others) and ubmits that the petitioners are similariy situated‘ therefore. the similar rder may be passed. 3. The case of the petiti ners is that they were appointed as Assistant Teacher in the Scho l Education Department on probation for a period of two years with t e fixed salary. However, later on, after completion of two years’ prob tion, the petitioners were regularized but, they were not giventhe re ular pay’scale. Other similarly situated teachers moved the State Adm nistrative Tribunal, Jabaipur for regular pay-scale, wherein learned counsel for the petitioners. ed P.L. for the State/respondents trticles 226/227 of the Constitution of rection to the respondents to pay the the basis of the date of their initiai ribunal vide order dated 31.1.2000 allowed the same. The petitio ers made several representations to accord the same treatment as they were also similarly situated, but, the respondents have not paid ny heed. Thus, this petit’ioL ng for the petitioners placed on record ober 2006 passed by this Court in Writ r Prasad Kurre and others Vs. State of \ l__ XI-HC-78 :§a:nmaun§&Hmif@mmgt . 58 o'.o;..-.. HE 200 VfW may be aiiowed to make a rei: similar treatment to the petitil been sanctioned to other simil: order of the State Administrat learned counsel for the responr 54 Havingrheard learned ct to the facts and circumstances the limited prayer made by lea to be reasonable. Therefore. representation withina period No.1, raising all their grievant resentation to respondent No.1 to give aners and same pay—scale which has arly situated teachers on account of the ‘ve Tribunal dated 31.1.2000, to which tent/State has no objection. )unsel for the parties and having regard of the case, in the opinion of this Court, ‘ned counsel for the petitioners appears the petitioners are allowed to make a of two weeks from today to respondent :es and. in turn, respondent No.1 shall mm (WW) m wW W? mna‘r‘ &' fgQ‘TWK mamm m HFaam aam am 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners decide the said representations in an objective manner a of 30 days from the date of receipt of such representations, after considering all the points by the petitioners and taking into account the order dated 31.12000 passed by the learned State Administrative Tribunal in Original Application No. 1452/1 998. 6. The writ petition is acc 3rdingly disposed of with the aforesaid ' direction. No order as to costs. l7. y Certified copy as per rules. w’ Sdl— . Dhirendra M‘Shra Judge Pp)» _)~/ P.T.O.