IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2077 OF 2007 Umakant Baburao Chavare..... ...... ......Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors.. ....... ...... Respondents. Mr.S.P.Mungate, Adv. For the petitioner. Mrs.P.P.Shinde, APP For the respondents. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 22/1/08 PC: The petitioner herein is the original complainant who filed a complaint under section 420 read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code against four accused persons. The trial Court passed an order directing issue of process only against accused Nos.1, 3 and 4. The petitioner did not question the legality and propriety of the order refusing to issue process against the accused No.2. After expiry of period of limitation for filing revision belatedly an application was moved yet again before the Magistrate seeking an order of issue of process against accused No.2, thereby implying questioning the order passed by the same Court refusing to issue process against accused No.2. After lapse of more than a year a revision was filed before the Sessions Judge questioning the order passed by the trial Court refusing to issue process against accused No.2. The Sessions Judge found that the delay has not been explained properly and 1 hence rejected the same. I have perused the order. So also perused the complaint filed by the petitioner before the Magistrate. Hardly any case is made out for issuance of process against accused No.2. Hence there is no reason to entertain this petition which goes to question the correctness of the order dismissing the revision by refusing to condone the delay. In the result writ petition is summarily dismissed. 22.1.08 2