IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6219 of 2008 Vishwanath Sah, Son of Late Bulli Sah, resident of Bara Chakia, P.S. Chakia, District- East Champaran --- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Secretary, Higher Education, Patna 2. The Vice-Chancellor, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur 3. The Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur 4. The Finance Controller, B.R.A.Bihar University, Muzaffarpur 5. Finance Officer, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur ----------------- Respondents. ---------------------------------- 10 21-09-2011 Heard Sri S. Parasmani, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Arun Kumar Prasad, learned A.C. to Govt. Advocate no.4, who appears on behalf of Respondent no.1 and Sri Harendra Kumar Tiwary, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent nos. 2 to 5/ B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. The writ petition was filed in the year 2008 with a prayer to direct the Respondents to pay retiral dues of the petitioner. In this case, no counter affidavit has been filed till date. However, on instruction, Sri Tiwary, learned counsel for the University informs the Court that during the pendency of the present writ petition, all the retiral dues of the petitioner have already been paid. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the statement made by the learned counsel for the University. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the University, there is no need to keep the matter further pending. The writ petition stands disposed of. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner that in case any grievance still exists, the 2 petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the Respondent no.2/ Vice- Chancellor, B.R.A. University, Muzaffarpur by way of filing representation within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, the Respondent no.2 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. If the Respondent no.2 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for clearing the dues of the petitioner within the aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, the Respondent no.2 is required to pass speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within two months from the date of filing of such representation. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)