THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3818 of 2011 Dated 18th February, 2011 Between: N.Soujanya Devi …Petitioner And District Collector, Mahaboobnagar District and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri V.L.Surendra Counsel for respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside order, dated 29.01.2011, of respondent No.3, whereby he has cancelled the petitioner’s fair price shop authorisation. I have heard Sri V.L.Surendra, learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies, and perused the record. On the petitioner’s own showing, she has filed an appeal before respondent No.2 along with a stay application questioning the order of respondent No.3 cancelling her fair price shop authorisation. The petitioner having already availed the efficacious alternative remedy cannot file the present writ petition seeking invalidation of the same order, which is the subject mater of the appeal. However, having regard to her grievance that respondent No.2 has not been disposing of the stay application filed along with the appeal on 14.02.2011, he is directed to dispose of the same in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the above, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.4726 of 2011 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 18th February, 2011 VGB