THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI C.R.P.No.5520 of 2009 ORDER This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 15.10.2009 passed in I.A.No.157 of 2009 in O.S.No.2110 of 2002 by the learned XI Additional Senior Civil Judge (Fast Track Court), City Civil Court, Hyderabad, wherein and whereby the petition filed under Order 1 Rule 10 and under Section 151 CPC seeking to add the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 as defendant Nos.3 to 5, was dismissed. Petitioners herein are the plaintiffs and respondent Nos.1 and 2 are defendants and respondent Nos.3 to 5 are the proposed defendant Nos.3 to 5. Plaintiffs filed the suit for specific performance of agreement to declare a gift deed as null and void and for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with plaintiffs’ possession over the suit property. When the suit is coming for cross-examination of PW1, the present application is filed seeking impleadment of respondent Nos.3 to 5 as defendant Nos.3 to 5 in the suit. The proposed parties remained ex parte and the defendants did not file any counter. The learned Judge after perusing the material available on record, dismissed the petition. Challenging the same, the present civil revision petition is preferred. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the learned Judge ought to have allowed the petition as respondent Nos.3 to5 are proper and necessary parties, which will resolve the issue in question. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the material available on record. A perusal of the record goes to show that the suit is filed for specific performance of an agreement in the year 2000 and the proposed parties were said to have purchased part of the suit schedule property on 18-12-2000 which is prior to filing of the suit. Since the suit is filed for specific performance, except parties to the agreement, no others shall be treated as proper or necessary parties. Except the prayer of impleadment, no other relief was sought for. There is no illegality or material irregularity in the order passed by the learned Judge and the findings arrived at by the court below needs no interference. The civil revision petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed. ____________________________ (JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI) rkk Dated: 26.11.2009