- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.35 OF 2004 Mr.Narayan Premgiri. .. Petitioner vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr. .. Respondents -- Shri M.P.Jadhav for the petitioner. Shri V.K.Khatu for respondents. -- CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J DATED : 21st December, 2004. P.C. 1. Heard the learned advocates for the parties. Perused the records. 2. The learned advocate for the respondents states that pursuant to the order passed on 5th July, 2001, the representation made for regularisation has already been rejected on 10th April, 2003. Considering that the application for regularisation has already been rejected and the unconditional apology having been tendered for the delay being caused for disposal of the matter, while accepting the said apology, I do not find any justification for proceeding against the respondents for contempt of Court. The petition is accordingly rejected. - 2 - -----