wagm ygw lovk 1N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATrISGARH AT BILASPUR (gHHATrIsGARH) WRIT PETITION (S) No. 3%0 OF 2006 PETITIONER : w Savita Choudhary D/o Late Shri Narayan Choudhary, aged about 29 years, Resident of Bhathapara (Bhathupara), Ambedkar Ward, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). $° «Wu/V VERSUS Q.Q~‘ egx '6’ «’5 § RéEPONDENTs : ill. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Women and Child Deveiopment, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). The Commissioner, Women and Child Qeveiopment, Raipur (C.G.). A; 3/3. The Coilector, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). The Project Officer, Women and Chiid Deveiopment, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C:G.). The District Programme Officer, Women and Child Development, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). The In—charge Public Relation Officer, Municipal Corporation, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). @@ /8. Kervinda Vishwakarma Wife of Shri Manoj Vishwakarma, aged about 28 years,‘ Resident of Bhathapara (Bhathupara), Ambédkar \Ward, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION _OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF \ MANDAMUS CERTIORARI PROHIBITION ETC. 2 or u" -7/ wwik, r _, ,,\ ‘J‘J'B N0" E960 ' V mm mvzooé mm<w§w> mwm WWW d/- WWW Wam fs€1m amimm s.B: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Priti nker Diwaker 29-06-2009: Shri V.K. Pandey, coun forthe petitioner. s I Shri Arvind Dubey, PL fo the Siate/ respondents No. 1,2,3,4 and 5. Smt. Hamida Siddiqui, c unsel for respondents No. 6 & 7. Shri F.S. Kharex counsel for respondent No. S.’ Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against the impugned order dated 20.6.2 6 there is an alternative remedy for him to approach before the oilector. Counsel for the petitione seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty move before the Coilector. He further submits that as he ha ‘fiied the writ petition before this Court, his appeai would be ti e barred; therefore the Collector may be directed to consider th point of Iimitation liberally. Accordingly, the writ p tition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. ln the eventuality of fling the appeal by the petitioner before the Collector, the poin of limitation would be considered by the Collector, keeping in before this Court. ind that writ petition was pending Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge t