IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2010 / 18TH POUSHA 1931 LA.App..No. 864 of 2009() ------------------------- LAR.168/2005 of PRL.S.C.,THALASSERY .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT; ------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS: ------------------------- 1. ANTHOLI NALINI, W/O.NANU,KOTTAYI HOUSE, P.O.MOORIYAD. 2. ANTHOLI VILASINI, KOTTAYI HOUSE, MOORIYAD. 3. ANTHOLI SURESH BABU, KOTTAYI HOUSE, MOORIYAD. 4. ANTHOLI CHANDRALEKHA, KOTTAYI HOUSE, MOORIYAD. 5. ANTHOLI SUNIL KUMAR, KOTTAYI HOUSE, MOORIYAD. 6. ANTHOLI BINDU, KOTTAYI HOUSE, MOORIYAD. 7. ANTHOLI SUJITH KUMAR, KOTTAYI HOUSE, MOORIYAD. 8. THE GENERAL MANAGER, KSIDC,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ADV. SRI.D.KRISHNANKUTTY PILLAI FOR R8 SRI.JOBY CYRIAC SRI.SHEEJO CHACKO FOR R8 SRI.RAJESH THOMAS FOR R1 TO 7 SRI.JIJO JOSEPH FOR R1 TO 7 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ---------------------------------- L.A.A. No.864 of 2009 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of January, 2010 J U D G M E N T ---------------- Pius C.Kuriakose,J. This appeal pertains to acquisition of land in Koothuparamba Village for the purpose of widening of road to Industrial Growth Centre. Relevant Section 4(1) notification was published on 30.1.2001. Land Acquisition Officer awarded the land value at Rs.2,148/- per Cent. Reference court under the impugned judgment re-fixed the same at Rs.7,000/- per Cent. The copy of the appeal was ordered to be given to the counsel for the requisitioning authority to find out whether the requisitioning authority has filed separate appeals. There was no representation for the requisitioning authority today. We keep in mind the other decision of this court pertaining to acquisition for the same purpose pursuant to the same notification and dismiss the appeal since we do not think that the enhancement granted is L.A.A..864/09-A 2 excessive. The appeal is dismissed. Parties are directed to suffer their costs. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE. okb