C.R. No. 6278 of 2008 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 6278 of 2008 Date of Decision: July 31, 2009 Nathwinder Singh …..Petitioner Vs. Parveen Kumari …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Sanjay Gupta, Advocate. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the respondent- defendant has stated that a suit for mandatory injunction directing the defendant- petitioner to handover the vacant possession after termination of the licence, has already been filed and the respondent does not have any intention to forcibly dispossess the petitioner from the property in dispute. Counsel for the respondent has stated that the respondent does not have any intention to forcibly interrupt C.R. No. 6278 of 2008 [2] the supply of the electricity as claimed by the petitioner, during the pendency of the suit. In view of the said statement, this revision petition has become infructuous. The same is disposed of superseding the orders dated December 2, 2005 (annexure P-7) and order dated July 22, 2008 (annexure P-8) passed by the Civil Judge and Appellate Court respectively, to the effect that the petitioner will not be forcibly dispossessed from the property in dispute except by due process of law, which has already been adopted by the respondent- defendant. July 31, 2009 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE