<p ^ w IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. ^^ ^ =7-/2005 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^^ ....-^ ^•••^"y ^^ (^^? ?••" ^ ^' ^y y / Sandeep Kumar Shrivastava, aged about 31 years S/o Narayan Prasad Shrivastava, resident of Gudhiyari Pahadi Chowki, beside Krishna Nagar, Raipur [C.G.]. VERSUS / 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Education Department and Ministry, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur [C.G.]. '' 2] Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Dharsiwa, District Raipur [C.G.]. 3] Block Education Officer, / Dharsiwa, District Raipur WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA T XI-HC-22 'sn^r'^T [<^i5h 'SRT^l /< ^"RW^tf^T ^Ai +. ^y ^^ ^ll^ld<4. ^Tll^i^, ferti^y ^s^^ zs ^IHHS ^HSC^ 209 'f^^' -SH^T'^[T^C'^al^T 7-12-2005 Shri Ashok Soni, comi^el for Shri Sandeep Dubey; Go^. Heard. Leamed counsel for the pel petition against the maction of thej petitioner for intendew. He furth countered and he was not caUed for Leanied State Counsel point Before the Collector under Rule 12 Sendces) Rules 1997 is available, Havmg comidered and case, the petition is disposed of wiA appeal before the Collector within| filed, the same shall be decided as CoUector. Consequently M.W.P. No. 4j of. . Cerlified copy as Rer rules. cb!&if<ri4lv1 ^H<rff ^ F^^l <psl^!< ^T3Tf^R3T?^T |he petitioner. Idv. for the State; on advance copy. |tioner submits that the petitioner has filed this respondents whei^by fhey haw not called the i^r submits that his experience has not been ihterview. out fhat altemative remedy of preferrmg appeal t^f Shikshakarma (Recmitment and Conditions of with^ut expressing any opmion on the merite ofthe a direction to fhe petitioaer that he may prefer 15 days from today and on such appeal being ©arlyas possible in accordance with law by the 1J744./2005 andI.A. No. 9936/2005 stand disposed Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge ['lft^ ^R^4