IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17357 of 2010 KAMLESH RAI @ KAMLU @ KAMLU RAI @ KAMLU SON OF LATE SHANKAR RAI R/O VILLAGE- NARSINGHPUR, P.S.- MUSAHARI, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 21/05/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner is named accused of the case registered under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code. It has been alleged by the informant that his minor daughter Kiran Kumari aged 11 years was enticed away by the petitioner Submission is that the victim has given her statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. in which she has stated that she has married with the petitioner and her marriage has not been tolerated due to social reasons. She was not willing to live with her parents rather she would live with her husband- the petitioner. Relying upon annexure-4 it has been submitted that the doctor has found her to be below 17 years of age but in fact she is a major lady. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 2 F.T.C. No. No. IV/concerned Court, Muzaffarpur in Sessions Trial No. 664 of 2009 arising out of Musahari P.S. Case No. 36 of 2009. avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)