IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH AUGUST 2010 / 21ST SRAVANA 1932 Crl.MC.No. 2435 of 2010() ------------------------- CC.670/2009 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-I, NEDUMANGAD .................... PETITIONER(S)/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------- THANKAYYAN NADAR, S/O.KRISHNAN NADAR, DIKKONAM, KUNNINPURATHU VEEDU,PERUNKATTAVILA, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ RESPONDENT(S)/ACCUSED: ---------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENJARAMMOODU POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUNDARESAN, S/O.RAGHAVAN NADAR, RESIDING AT POOVANATTUMMOODU KADAPPALLY VEETTIL, NELLANADU VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. JALALUDEEN, SON OF KASIM KUNJU, RESIDING AT ROSE COTTAGE, PALLINADA, POTHENCODE, TEEPUKAL MURI, VEMBAYAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. SURENDRAN, S/O.NEELAKANDAN, MADATHUVILAKATHU VEEDU NEAR SALINIBHAVAN SCHOOL, NELLANADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 5. SATHYADASAN @ G.S.DASAN, S/O.GANGADARAN NADAR, ELLUKANDATHIL VEEDU, PUTHEN NADA, PURAKKAD VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.B.JAYASURYA THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J. ------------------------------- CRL.M.C.NO.2435 OF 2010 (D) ----------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of August, 2010 O R D E R Petitioner is the de facto complainant in C.C.No.670 of 2009 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Nedumangadu. The above case has arisen from a police report filed in Crime No.64 of 2004 of Vattappara Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 419, 420, 468, 471 and 474 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner/ de facto complainant had approached this Court on earlier occasions as well seeking directions/orders for expeditious disposal of the case. A report was called for, through the Registry, from the learned Magistrate, for the delay in completion of the trial of the case. It is now reported that in view of the petitions filed by some of the accused seeking their discharge, which was pending for consideration, some delay had occurred in proceeding further for completion of the case in CRL.M.C.2435/10 2 accordance with law. It is further reported that the plea of discharge canvassed by those accused had been negatived by orders passed by the learned Magistrate on 10.8.2010 and charges have been framed against all the accused and the case now stands posted for examination of CWs.1 to 4 in the case on 6.9.2010. 2. Having regard to the report so collected, I find no further orders are required other than a direction to the learned Magistrate to give the case top priority for trial and disposal, as expeditiously as possible. Subject to the above direction, the Crl.M.C. is disposed of. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN JUDGE prp CRL.M.C.2435/10 3