SCA/17159/2006 1/3 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 17159 of 2006 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI ===================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ===================================================== PATAN TALUKA KHADI GRAMUDHYOG SAHAKARI MANDALI LIMITED - Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT THRO.ADDL.SECRETARI(APPELAS) & 2 - Respondent(s) ===================================================== Appearance : MR PRAKASH K JANI for Petitioner(s) : 1, MS MANISH L SHAH AGP for Respondent(s) ===================================================== CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI Date : 08/09/2006 SCA/17159/2006 2/3 JUDGMENT ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Rule. Learned Asst. Government Pleader Ms. Shah wavies service of rule on behalf of respondents. 2. In the present petition, the petitioner has approached this Court at a stage when revision application filed by the petitioner against the order dated 23rd June, 2006 and 24th July, 2006 is pending before the State Government. Main grievance of the petitioner is that though the revision application is being considered, no interim protection has been granted to the petitioner. 3. By the order dated 8th August, 2006, this Court while issuing notice had granted protection in favour of the petitioner by directing maintenance of status quo. 4. Learned advocate Shri Jani points out that further hearing of the revision application is fixed before the State Government on 12th September, 2006. 5. In the facts of the present case, it is directed SCA/17159/2006 3/3 JUDGMENT that the respondents shall maintain status quo with respect to the liquidation of the petitioner society till final decision in the revision application is arrived at. The petitioner shall cooperate with the proceedings before the Government. 6. With these directions, the petition is disposed of. Rule is made absolute to the above extent. No costs. (Akil Kureshi, J.) /smita/