IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2008 / 14TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 472 of 2008(F) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ----------------- RAJEEV, S/O. KRISHNANKUTTY, ELECTRICITY WORKER (UNDER SUSPENSION), ELECTRICAL SECTION, KARUKONE, ANCHAL, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL SRI.SAIJU. S SRI.T.R.SUGUNAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION OFFICE, PUNALUR, KOLLAM DIST. 3. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KARUKONE, ANCHAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BEJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/01/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 472 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 4th January, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner challenges Exhibit P2 order of suspension issued by the Executive Engineer. In my view, petitioner has an efficacious alternate remedy against Exhibit P2. It is upto him to pursue the same. If the petitioner files an appeal against Exhibit P2, within two months, it shall be treated as filed within time. It shall be looked into by the competent authority and a decision taken thereon, within two months thereafter. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) ma K.THANKAPPAN,J CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999 ORDER 25th May, 2007