HgGH SQURT GF SHHAT?E$E£\RH £T 8§LA$PUR M$€3ELLANEGU§$ .QPPEA? Ni} f8G GF 2$35 : M‘s Madi Cement Campany Ltd, (Now M/s Ambuja Cement Eastem Ltd.}, Through Shri Devanand Pandey, Dy. GM. (P&A), P.O. Rawan, Tahsil Baioda Bazar, District Raipur (6.8.) $3W‘ELUAM? Versus RESPGN.ENT : Union of india. Through Generai Manager,‘$outh Eastern Raiiway (Now South East Centrai Raiiway’), Biiaspur (C.G.) APPEAL UNDER SECTION 23 OF THE RAILWAY CLAIM§ TRIBUMAL ACE 1987 ($inqle Eench: Hon“bie Mr. MK. Aqarwat. J.) Preseni : ShriAshish Shrivastava,counseiforthe appeiiant. ' Shri Amii Choudhary, counsei with Ms. Naushina Aii, counsel for the respondent. oRAL GREER (Passed on 2am day of Agni. 20m) Shri Amit Choudhary along with Ms. Nausnina Aii, iearned .k i couneel for the respondent referring to sUb-seetion (1) of Section 23 of \ the Raiiways Ciaims Tribunal Act. 1987, have raieed a preiiminary objection aboui the maintainability of the present appeal before the High Court of Chhat‘tisgarh as the impugned judgment has been passed by Bhopal Bench of Railways Ciaims Tribunal, which is located within the territoriai iuriscliotion or“ Madnya Pradesh High Court. Shri Ashish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the appellant, in View or the preiiminary objection, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal with the liberty of tiling another appeal before the High Court of Madhya Praciesh. 2. 3. Permission granted. 4. With the above liberty, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned judgment to learned counsel for the appeliant immediately. Sci/- c N.K. Agrawal Judge