IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 6991 of 2010 Date of Decision: 21.4.2010 Sunita Kumari ....Petitioner. Versus Punjab State Electricity Board and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. In this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release her the pension along with interest on the delayed payment at the rate of 18% per annum from the date it became due till the actual payment is made. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made a representation dated 17.3.2010 (Annexure P-3) to respondent No.3 for the same relief as claimed in this writ petition but no action has been taken thereon so far and she shall feel satisfied if a direction is issued to him to decide the same in a given time frame. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the file, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to decide the representation (Annexure P-3) sent by the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order by passing a speaking order. April 21, 2010 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE