R-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPURfC.G.) W.P.NO. '^2-25 OF2003. / ^ PETITIONER •a tiiliNl^l^ t RESPONDENTS ,* ^SS%5P'"'' ..^^" ^^s^'1" ^•y^" t^ .-••••' ^•&' VERSUS Derhu ram Chandravanshi S/o Shri Arjun Singh Chandravanshi, aged about 36 yea'rs, R/o P.0. Buchatolla, P.S. Chhuriya, Tah.& Distt. Rajnandgaon.(C.G.) :1. The State of Chhatisgarh, Through The Secretary, Public Works Department Mantralay, D.K.S. Building , Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Executive Engineer Public Works Department Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSITITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 3:n^rqiT RFfNia.n^r fiwfi gf?cT fiW^i B(^ 3^T •*ll<llcl.4, OTflyis, Rldlti^< 3ii^i ^iacb .W.C..2^.Z72>.7Q^ HWCII ynwvn -••••••••••••••••••-y^.^gQ f^s .:_3~ sn^r ??mw nfN' 20.09.2006 ^irafefrr iiTERff ff isc^ (tezrc ^Tsrf^irsn^T Shri Anoop Maiumdeti'. Counsel for the netitioner. Shii Sushil Ditbev. State/ resDon.dents. Areuinents heard. Oider dictated as foUows : ORAL ORDER Keeitiers ifla By wav of this Writ! the validitv of tliis transfei has been transferred f] Rainaadgaon to District The submission of y the petitioner is workiael seniorin' of the Time oreciselv Ctrcle wise aad ifl uarticular District is traa; seniorin' in the sradation hand m.av affect the rishtsl other haud. it mav also alreadv holdiiia a transfen-ed District. For the present. lea) lunited oraver that at thisl and the petitioner inav be oarticUlar Govt. Advocate for the tf^n rso f^f\c^\ l^*"*'^'**' *^<'*^"ftf%^.l Petition. the petitioner has challenged order dated 08/07/2003, whereby, he Iroin vfllaee - Kuniarda. District - Pura fAnnexure P-11. ;amed counsel for the oetitioner is that on the Dost of Tim.e Keeper and fhe are inauitained Distaict wise. niore Derson workiaa ia the departiuent of a tferred out of the District, certamly his llist would be fixed afrcsh, which at one lofthe nersons so tiansferred and on the fhe riehts of the oersons. who are olace in the gradation list of the alffect med counsel for the petitioner inakes a staee. this petitioa niav be disposed of siven a libei'tv to file a reiiresentation is XI-HC-22 an^rw f^rwsn^T Shtf Hfg(T SiqT^i ^Aj^f -,e£SS Ssi •^MM^, a-dl+l'lG, (sirtiyy 3T(^T4ach i^r '2_-2--2_S / 03 (IIHflTSRtTrei 200 f^s 3n^r??dTWHf5(T '4-. file this reeard before the concf authori.tv mav be dtrected to stioulated period eraiited bv This lunited m'aver netitioner is not opposed bv U The nraver is aUowed. This oetition is dismi^ advised. the oetitiouer niav concemed aufhority withinl alongwith a coov of this ordel if such a reuresentation is conceraed authoritv shall urefei^blv wifhin a ueriod d receiut of the said represental With the aforesaid obs| disuosed of. There shall be no orderl ;med aufhoritv and fhe concemed tlispose of his reDresentation wifhin a (liis Court. tnade bv leamed counsel for the •anied counsel for the State. ^rafefr-r WR^ft'ff te& ^fKR ^sfRtiTsn^T Ised with fhis observatiou tliat if so a detailed reoresentation before the a neriod of 3 weeks froia todav |r and a CODV of fbis Writ Petition and Rled withiti fhe aforesaid oeriod. the of the sam.e as earlv as possible {F 3 nionths froui the date of filuae/ tion before hiru. sryations. fhis netition staads finallv disjuose as to cost. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge