IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1666 OF 2009 Mr.Vijaykumar J. Agarwal. ... Appellant. V/s. The Assistant Commissioner of Income tax. ... Respondent. WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1682 OF 2009 M/s.Creative Computers & Marketing P.Ltd. ... Appellant. V/s. Income Tax Officer 6(2)(1). ... Respondent. Atul K. Jasani for the appellant. P.S.Sahadevan for the respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 15th September 2009. P.C. : Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused impugned order. 2. Needless to mention that the mistake has to be proved as any other fact. The Tribunal has given due weightage to the record of the Stock Exchange; appreciated evidence on record; and recorded finding of fact with which no fault can be found. The said finding can hardly be said to be perverse finding. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. Both appeals are dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA J.)