1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 377 OF 2010 (Santosh Jayendra Deorankar vs. Smt. Rakhi Santosh Deorankar & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. FEBRUARY 25, 2010. Heard Shri Bhishikar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Bhusari, Advocate holding for Mrs. Chandekar, learned counsel for the respondents. Shri Bhishikar, learned counsel has produced before this Court, the order sheets maintained by the Family Court in Petition No. C-107/2007. The order sheets clearly show that on 22.10.2009, the respondent and his counsel were not present. The impugned order mentions that “it is mutually decided”. Further mutually decided is to give respondent before Family Court and petitioner before this Court a temporary custody of children from 4.30 to 5.30 PM before Court Counselor. Shri Bhishikar, learned counsel has invited attention to the order dated 11.05.2009 and 30.06.2009 earlier passed to show that by impugned order, material change has been brought about in it. Ms. Bhusari, Advocate informs that the learned counsel for the respondent is not available and she is seeking time at this stage. 2 However, as I find that there is apparent inconsistency in order passed below Exh. 42 and order sheets maintained by Family Court, the matter needs to be reconsidered by that Court. For that purpose, the order dated 22.10.2009 passed below at Exh. 42 is quashed and set aside and the matter is restored back to the file of Family Court, Nagpur for taking fresh decision in accordance with law. The xerox certified copy of order sheets produced by Shri Bhishikar, learned counsel is taken on record. Writ Petition is disposed of. Rule accordingly. No order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.