IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25858 of 2011 Md. Irfan son of Md. Manowar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 5.8.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence u/ss.376, 341, 342 and 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated 11.2.2010 vide Cr.Misc.No.40766 of 2009 since the allegation against him was that he had assisted co-accused in committing rape on the prosecutrix. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail on the ground that a compromise petition has been filed by the informant. However, on going through the impugned order, I find that the prosecutrix was examined as P.W.3 and she has fully supported her earlier version. In view of such, I am not inclined to review the earlier order. The prayer for bail is once again rejected. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )