IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 10294 of 1999 Date of Decision: September 27, 2010 Head Constable Satyavir Singh …Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana and others. … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana, for the respondents. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Mr. Vivek Sharma, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, states that despite of his best efforts, he could not get instruction and contact with the petitioner. Dismissed for non-prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to get the petition restored if he is able to get instructions from the petitioner within 30 days from today. September 27, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge