IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17140 of 2011 BREAK RAI @ VIVEK RAI @ DIPAK son of Setha Rai, resident of Company Bag, back of Police Chawki, Danapur Cantt. P.S.-Danapur, District- Patna. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 14.6.2011. Heard Mr. Mahesh Narayan Parbat, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M. Haque, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No.254 of 2009 for the offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only on suspicion, the petitioner has been made accused and taken into custody. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while referring first information report, submits that only allegation against the petitioner was that on the day of occurrence the petitioner being friend of son of the informant had called him and thereafter he informed the informant that his son had already left the place. Save and except suspicion, there is nothing on the record to connect the petitioner. On the contrary it was submitted that wife of Bengali Dome had threatened the son of the informant on the same day with dire consequence. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case particularly the fact that only on suspicion the petitioner was made accused, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on 2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, District Patna in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No.254 of 2009. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)