IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24896 of 2008 BINOD KUMAR SAO Son of Late Munik Sao, Azad Road No.1, P.S. Behind Patel flat No. 181 Kankarbagh, District Patna. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 20.10.2008 Heard. The F.I.R. was lodged under Section 414/34 IPC against the petitioner and seven others regarding an occurrence of recovery of stolen motor-cycle from the possession of the petitioner and that co-accused Raju Sah confessed before the Police that he had sold the stolen motor-cycle to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to Annexure-3, sale-deed which mentions that the petitioner purchased the motor-cycle from co-accused Raju Sah for a sum of Rs.20,001/- and that Rs.1,000/- only was paid at that time under stipulation that the remaining amount will be paid subsequently. The sale letter also indicates that at the time of sale, any document regarding the vehicle was not produced before the petitioner who had purchased the vehicle. Petitioner is said to be in custody since 25th March 2008. Under the circumstances, I do not feel inclined to allow bail to the petitioner for the present. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, if so advised, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail on completion of one year of incarceration from the date of remand in this case. Jay/ (C.M. Prasad,J)