1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 768 OF 2009 Smt. Shiri Prasang Tamang ... Applicant. V/s State of Maharashtra .. Respondents. Mr. Prakash Naik for the applicant. Mr. Rajesh More, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 24 th February, 2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. 2. Applicant has been arrested in connection with the offence punishable under sections 343, 372, 373, 323 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. There is sufficient material on record to indicate the involvement of the present applicant. 3. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submitted that the prosecutrix was sold to one Vimala who has been released on bail. He submitted that, therefore, applicant also deserves to be released on bail on the ground of parity. He submitted that the applicant is 2 suffering from Aids and requires medical treatment. This submission cannot be accepted. The Sessions Court has observed that the applicant already has been getting proper treatment at Bhyculla Hospital. Applicant, cannot claim bail on the ground of parity since there is sufficient material on record to show the applicant's involvement. 4. Application for bail is, therefore, rejected. Trial, however, is expedited. The Sessions Court to decide the case as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of eight months. 5. Application is disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)