1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Second Appeal No.824 of 2006 with C.A.No.10226/2006. _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _______________________|_______________________________________ 1. Heard counsel. 2. Since the Second Appeal is not maintainable and earlier order rendered by this Court is now confirmed by the Division Bench in the Reference proceedings, legal position is quite clear as regards maintainability of appeal against order of interim suspension under the provisions of Section 41D(5) of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. Mr.Katneshwarkar, submits that sufficient time may be given by extending the interim relief so as to enable the appellants to prefer Writ Petition. The interim relief is continued only for four (4) weeks and in the meanwhile, liberty granted to file the Writ Petition during vacation. (V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) Dt.11.12.2009. asp/office/sa824.06