IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 798 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 14, 2010 Union of India and others …Appellants Versus Ex. Gnr. Harnek Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Ms. Meenakshi Chaudhary, Advocate, for Mr. Ram Chander, Sr. Panel Central Govt. Standing Counsel, for the appellants. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. This appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent challenges order dated 21.10.2009, passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No. 11315 of 2009. The learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition by placing reliance on a judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Gurjit Singh v. Union of India and others (CWP No. 648 of 2007, decided on 20.2.2008. There is no serious dispute with regard to the aforesaid legal position. Similar view has been taken in the case of Union of India v. Dhani Ram (LPA No. 877 of 2009, decided on 3.12.2009) by upholding the view taken by the learned Single Judge. In view of the above, there is no room to interfere in the order passed by the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed. No order is required to be passed on the application for condonation of delay in filing and re-filing the appeal. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (A.N. JINDAL) July 14, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2