IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 23RD AUGUST 2007 / 1ST BHADRA 1929 RP. No. 405 of 2002(D) --------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP. 27121/2001 .................................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/2ND & 3RD RESPONDENTS IN OP: --------------------------- 1. FATHIMA BEEVI, MEPPURATHU HOUSE, PETTAH, VETTIPPURAM MURI, PATHANAMTHITTA VILLAGE. 2. ABDUL SALAM ALIAS KHADERKUTTY, MEPPURATH HOUSE, PETTAH, PATHANAMTHITTA VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI. BIJI MATHEW SRI. A.N. RAJAN BABU RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & IST RESPONDENT IN OP: ----------------- 1. NAGOOR MEERA, AMMINIYAMMA VEEDU, PETTAH, PATHANAMTHITTA VILLAGE. 2. PATHANAMTHITTA MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PATHANAMTHITTA. BY ADV. SRI. P. SIVARAJ SRI. K. PRAVEEN BABU SRI. T.H. ABDUL AZEEZ GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.R. DEEPA. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: RP. No. 405/2002(D) Order on C.M.P. No. 28856/2002 in R.P. No. 405/2002 in O.P. No. 27121/2001 --------------------------------------------------------------- Dismissed. 23.08.2007 Sd/- KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. // True Copy // P.A. to Judge. smp KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- Review Petition NO. 405 OF 2002 IN O.P. NO. 27121 OF 2001 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of August, 2007. O R D E R This review petition is at the instance of the second and third respondents in O.P. No. 27121/2001. This Court disposed of the original petition directing the first respondent-Municipality to look into Exhibit P2 representation filed by the writ petitioner and to take appropriate action in the matter in accordance with law. 2. The grievance in the representation pertains to the alleged nuisance caused by the review petitioners. The attempt in the original petition was only to suppress the orders passed in O.S. No. 299/2001 and O.S. No. 394/2001 on the file of Munsiff Court, Pathanamthitta and also the proceedings of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Adoor. It is made clear that while Municipality considering the representation of the writ petitioner, the orders passed by the Civil Court and the Revenue Divisional Officer shall also be taken into consideration. This review petition is disposed of as above. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp KURIAN JOSEPH, J. R.P. NO. 405 OF 2002 O R D E R 23.08.2007