IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.3149 of 2006 Date of decision:14.09.2010 Balwan Singh ....Appellant versus Balak Ram and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. A.S. Sullar, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Vinod Gupta, for the New India Assurance Company. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) 1. It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the Insurance Company that the appeal has been filed against the award dated 01.04.2005. Learned counsel states that this award dated 01.04.2005 was subsequently reviewed on an application filed by the Insurance Company and a final order was passed on 11.07.2005. This fact has been referred to in CM No.19244-CII of 2005 in FAO No.3052 of 2005. On this representation itself, FAO No.3052 of 2005 filed by the Insurance Company was allowed to be withdrawn vide order dated 23.09.2005. In view of the fact that the judgment appealed against subsequently was FAO No.3149 of 2006 - 2 - reviewed and modified, order passed against which this appeal has been filed at the stage prior to the order passed in review, cannot survive. The appeal against the award is dismissed as not maintainable. It shall be possible to prefer an independent appeal only against the award that was passed subsequently on a review application filed at the instance of the insurer. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 14.09.2010 sanjeev