:1: :1: :1: IN IN IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION SIDE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1230 OF 2003 PETITION NO. 1230 OF 2003 PETITION NO. 1230 OF 2003 ALONGWITH ALONGWITH ALONGWITH CHAMBER CHAMBER CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 393 OF 2006 SUMMONS NO. 393 OF 2006 SUMMONS NO. 393 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1230 OF 2003 PETITION NO. 1230 OF 2003 PETITION NO. 1230 OF 2003 Archer Exports P.Ltd ....Petitioners vs. Union of India and Ors. ....Respondents. -------- Mr.G.B.Kedia for the petitioners. Mr.D.A.Dubey for respondent no.1. Mr.Vinod Kothari i/by.M/s.Apex Law Partners for applicant in Ch/s.No.393 of 2006. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.N.PATEL, J. J.N.PATEL, J. J.N.PATEL, J. And S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. J. J. DATE DATE DATE ; 15TH FEBRUARY, 2007. ; 15TH FEBRUARY, 2007. ; 15TH FEBRUARY, 2007. P.C :- 1. The Learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Mardia Chemicals Ltd vs. Union of India and Ors reported in AIR 2004 SC 2371, he seeks to withdraw the petition and submits that in the mean :2: :2: :2: time, the ad-interim order granted by this court in terms of prayer clause (f) may be continued for a period of six weeks to enable the Petitioner to take recourse to such remedies available under the Secrutisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. We permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition with a direction that the interim order granted by this court by the order dated 20.4.2003 shall continue to be in operation for a period of six weeks. Petition dismissed as withdrawn. 2. In view of the withdrawal of the Petition itself, Chamber Summons No. 393 of 2006 does not survive and the same is disposed off accordingly (J.N.PATEL, J) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)