1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA NO.5367/2008 IN FA ST.NO.9911/2008. (The State of Maharashtra and Ors. Vs. Siddheshwar Vibute) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.SD Kaldate, AGP for State; Mr.BK Pawar, Adv. for sole respondent. ___ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 7 th May, 2010. ... 1) Heard. 2) The State seeks to condone the delay of 1253 days in prosecuting the matter. The Award of learned Reference Court is dated 2nd September, 2004, copy application was belatedly made. The matter was sent for processing to the Government and consequently, the delay of1253 days caused. The delay is not explained rationally or otherwise to exercise its condonation in favour of the State. 3) Incidentally, the Award under challenge is perused, which deals with the 2 acquisition of 20 R. of the agricultural field by the learned Reference Court, granting additionally Rs.20,533/-. 4) The application for condonation lacks sufficiency of grounds, dismissed. Consequently, the appeal dismissed. No costs. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/ca5367.08