IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22679 of 2011 1.Ramdhani Mahto son of late Ganauri Mahto 2.Dashrath Mahto son of late Ramu Mahto All residents of village-Sonbarsa, P.S.-Warisaliganj District-Nawada Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 15.7.2011. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under sections 20 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act, the petitioners seek bail. It is alleged that on a tip off the informant along with police force and local Chaukidar reached the field of village Sonbarsa where opium plants were being grown and the witnesses present there disclosed that the field wherein the opium plants had been grown belonged to the petitioners and in their presence after harvesting bundles of opium plants were kept which were seized by the police party. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the seized bundles of opium were not weighed. No analyst report is there. Maximum punishment would be six months. Therefore, the petitioners deserve anticipatory bail. Taking into consideration the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners as also the fact that the case is under N.D.P.S. Act, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for bail is rejected. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)