IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40675 of 2009 SATYENDRA PASWAN Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 3/ 19.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no doubt two Mahants of Matth are killed but none is named and petitioner’s name appeared in the case that one of the Mahants namely, Suresh Das was a witness in a case filed on behalf of Ramjanam Vishwakarma for the offence under Sections 406 and 420 of the I.P.C. for non-returning of Rs. 1,00,000/- which never can justify petitioner’s arrest. Taking that into consideration, prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 78 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Aurangabad subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. However, Trial Court shall justify the bail so granted to the petitioner at the stage of hearing the case on charge matter. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)