WP(C) 5082/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P K MUSAHARY Heard Mr. HRA Choudhury, learned senior counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D.Saikia, learned Addl.A.G.Assam, appearing on behalf of the State Responden ts. The main grievance of the petitioner is that although he has been serving as Ass istant Teacher since 21.8.1989 and he was Teaching as Graduate Teacher in the ve nture school concerned and he was receiving financial assistance as senior teach er for last three years. He has been deprived of the said financial assistance i n the year 2000-2011 for the reasons not disclosed to the petitioner. In his pl ace respondent No.6, who is junior to him has been granted the financial assista nce by the Govt. Further allegation is that the guidelines issued by the Govt. i n respect of disbursement of the financial assistance has been violated. It is t o be noted that the school concerned is a private institution inasmuch as it has not been provincialised. Petitioner filed representation dated 18.4.2011 before the Inspector of Schools, Barpeta but the said petition is still pending unatte nded to. Mr. Choudhury, learned senior counsel submits that a direction may be issued to the Inspector of Schools, respondent No.3 to enquire into the matter and take ne cessary action. In my considered view, no order for payment/disbursement of the financial assist ance to the petitioner could be passed unless the factual aspects of the mater i n enquired and ascertained by the competent authority. In view of the above, I d ispose of this writ petition directing the respondent, particularly the responde nt no.3 to inquire into the matter about the entitlement of the petitioner vis-à -vis respondent No.6 the allegation of violation of the guidelines of the Govt a nd pass necessary order as he may deem fit and proper in accordance with law wit hin a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of t his order. It is needless to say that if on enquiry any malafide action or manipulation of record is found by the school authority, the respondent No.3 shall be at liberty to institute appropriate legal proceeding against the erring person. This disposes of the writ petition.