^ HIGH COURT OF GHHATTISGA^ AT BILA8PUR Writ Pedtinn No. 4048 rf»(04 PETITIONER : Amit Kumar Mahapatta, sni of lato BkolanaA Mahapatra, aged about25 years, rasidaitrfBhMram Deo, WardNo. 4, Jagdaipur, IMstrictBastar. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Chhattisgaih Throu^ ite Seciretaiy MNstry of Home AiEfaiis & GeneTal AAHmiateafion Dqiarteient, DKS Bhawan, Raipm (CG). 2. The SuperiateBdeBtofPoBce, Bastw, Jagddlpur 3.8tate of Mad^a Pradesh, tfwot^h tiie Sectetaty, Ministry of Home Afiairs, Vallabh Kiawaa, Bhopal • (MP). (WRCT PETHION UNDER ARTICUE2M & 227 OFTISCONSrrTFBmCBST OF INDIA) rSBiH(m'MeMF.Satt^tI£J^nfl teLJA Present : Shri AjitSingh, AdvocdBfi»tiiepett<Mier. ShriY.S. TkalEur, Dy. AdvocfdB Genaal wtlfa Ms. SumtaJaii^ PanelLawyerfortfaeStete. OS^LOWOER (PassedoirU* dayf^Scspbaadsw, 200^ 1. Withthecoasentofleamedcounselappeatn%for(hepartie^them^ier is heant findly. 2. The indisputable fiicte, in autsfadl, ^projectadlQtAe prtitioaeru-eAat the fadier of the petitioner aamety Mafaapaba wwldag as AsMstant Teacher inthe MiddIeSdiool,Ji®ddpur,diedoB01.09.1999 ia haiaess, which is evidfflitftoiaAnaexute-P/4. Tto p^ti<»eraiade an applicatioa for appomtiaassiA OB compassionate basis fw te Assistaat Grade HI. Thereafiier, the askeAAe petitioner to submit the Hiadi Tyfaas E?amiaatk»ncCTtfficate by letter dated 3-10-2000 (Aaaexure-P/6). TUe petitioaer sulwutted the swne before Ae respoadeat autfaoriti^s. Afier <Aitmiang Ifae Mme tteDisrtrict Educatfon CttBcer by letter dated 13-'7-2001 (Annanire-P/S) forwanted tiie case of fhe petitioner to the Dwedor, PuUie Education wilfa a •y Sato >• w TecomtBendati(M»Aat one post ofAssistantt^ade-III is lyingvaeait in tfae district. 3. Mr. ^it Singh, leamed couasel appcaring for thepetitiona- suibmitts tiiat inspite of various recommendations as well as fiaatfe efforts made by the petitioner, no action has been taken by Ihe reqxaideHt autfiorities fw grantiag eompassioaate appointment to tiie pditioaer on tl»post <rf Assistant Grade-HI. Due to said act of Ae respondfflit adfatnities, Ae fainily members offhe deceasal empl<^eeaee atdtest^e ofstarva&in. 4. I have h^ird Icamed counsel forth&parties, gerused the pleadh®said fhe documents appended Aereta. The petitioaer has complied Ihc direetions issued ly the TespondeataBdKwitiesbysubmittifflgAeiBndi TypiagExaaninatioaccrtifi<sate,ete. The Stete of Cfahattis^rh byits cu'cular dated 2-2-2006 has taken a decisioa that die cases ofaB "tfaose deceased employees who had died afier t-11-1997 tfll 31-10-2000 before Stats of ChhattisgaA came into existenee, shall be eonsidered for gyant of compassionate aiq»mtment. In die light of above»A® petitioaerdeservesconsideration. 5. In view offhsfor%oiag,tiierespoadentaBAoritiesare directed to consider Ifae case offhe petitioner, in a<»oidaacewith law, oa to own merits, aad pass qipropriato orderaas eii^iedMoudyas p(»able. 6. Wift tiie aforesud observtdion, tiiis petitini is disposed of. Consequently, pending applicatitKis, ffany, ^so stand disposed of SA'- Satish K. Agnihom Judge