^ ^or \tt* HIGH COVRT OF CHHATHSGARH. BIL^SPUR W.P. (Sl Mo.72S3/200?7 PBTI'nOMBR RESPONDBII're ^ 3. 4. s. Amamafh Sahoo, S/o Sfari Basram Sahoo, Aged about 34 years, R/o Kanchanpur, Tah: Baadhavgarh, Ditrict Umaria (M.P.) Versus Chairman, Coal India Limited, 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata (W.B.) Director (P. & IR) Coal India Umited, 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata (W.B.) Meinber Sccretary, JBCC-VI (Jomt Biparttte Coaunittec for Tte Coal Indiistty), Coal India Ltd. 10, Netaji Subhash Road, KoBsata (W.B.) Chainnan-ciua-l^anagiag Director, S.E.C.L. Head Qtr. Scepat Road, BUaspur (G.O.) Chief General Masayet, SiihaQ>ur Area, Distiict Shahdol (M.P.) WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICUB 326 OF THK <M>»8'nTUTI® OP INDJA Appearance: ShriRahul Misfara, Counsel fcr Ihe petitioner. Shri Praveen Das, Couasel for thc rBspondents on advaaoc copy. ORAL ORDBR (07.12^007) SUKIL KUMAR 8IMHA, J Heaid. ,> Leamed counsel appearing for fhe petitioaer subxnits fbat the case of petitioner is sinularty situated to that of the respondente in fhe inatter of Chairoian, Central Coeiyields Ltd., 9s Others - vs. ~ Jivendra Pmsad. Tfwcai 8s oOiers (Civil Appecd No. 1714/2007), Leamed counsel fluther submtts tfaat fhe sald Cndl Appeal has becn disposed of vide order dated 29ttl Bifarch W.P. (S)No.7253/2007 2007, passed by fhe Hon'ble Supreme Court of Itidia. Me further submits that fhis case niay also be disposed of ia fhe same tenns, which thc learaed counsel appcariag for thc respondeats/SECL does not controvert. In view of the above, tfate petition staads dteposed of ia fhe same tenns. No order as to coste. —-—- Sd/- SuniIKumarSinha Judge / \