IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30152 of 2008 AMANUL HAQUE @ MOKHAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 6.1.2009 Heard Sri Ram Shankar Prasad, Advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The case has been registered under Sections 366A, 361A and 120B of the IPC under the allegation that the present petitioner took away the two children of the complainant. There is absolutely no intent or purpose stated in the complaint petition except that the request was for looking after the ailing wife of the petitioner. It is indicated by the case diary that the children have come back and they have also made statement supporting that the petitioner had taken away. The contention is that there is no intent or motive except the purpose as stated in the complaint petition has been stated by the two children. Under the above facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah in Sathi P.S.Case No.98 of 2007. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )