IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13487 of 2008 ====================================================== 1. Sidhi Singh , son of Late Gopal Singh 2. Umesh Kumar Singh alias Umesh Singh, son of Late Kapil Singh 3. Ganesh Singh 4. Bachu Singh 5. Ram Naresh Singh All sons of Late Saheb Singh 6. Rekha Devi (Kuer) W/o Late Ashoki Singh 7. Bhola Singh 8. Amarjeet Kumar Both minor sons of Late Ashoki Singh 9. Shanti Kumari 10. Nandani Kumari Both minor D/o Late Ashok Singh 11. Manoj Singh 12. Arbind Singh Both sons of Late Kameshwar Singh 13. Ragho Singh, son of Subba Singh All resident of village - Bishunpur, P.O. ¾ Nima Budhaul, Anchal + P.S. – Amas, District - Gaya .... .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Joint Director of Consolidation , Magadh Division, Gaya 3. The Consolidation Officer, Amas, Gaya 4. Sheo Kumar Singh, son of Ramsharan Singh @ Sharan Singh, resident of village - Bishunpur, P.O. – Neema Budhaus, Anchal + P.S. – Amas, District - Gaya. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Achhaibar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Sc1) Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh-1 Mr. Brajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 29-04-2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.C. to Standing Counsel No. 1 and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 4. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf Patna High Court CWJC No.13487 of 2008 (3) dt.29-04-2013 2/2 of respondent no. 4 submits that since the present writ petition pertains to an order passed under Section 35 of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956, this matter may be transferred to the Tribunal. He submits that in identical matter, this Court in an another writ petition i.e. CWJC No. 11912 of 2008 on 18/4/2013 has directed for transferring the record to the Tribunal. In view of the fact that for adjudicating such dispute a Tribunal has already been constituted, the Court is of the opinion that this dispute can well be adjudicated by the Tribunal which has been constituted and functioning under the provision of Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). Accordingly, in view of provision contained in Section 15 of the Act, the Registry is directed to transmit the record of the case to the Tribunal forthwith. Praful/- (Rakesh Kumar, J)