IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.343 of 2010 1. RAJESH RANJAN KISHORE, S/O Shri Narendra Kumar Mallik, R/O Alakapuri, New Colony, P.O.- Anishabad, P.S. Gardanibagh, Distt- Patna. 2. Vedant Chandan, S/O Shri Ramdhari Singh Diwakar, R/O First Floor, D- 169, P.C. Colony, Lohiya Nagar, Kandarbagh, P.O. Lohiya Nagar, P.S. Kankarbagh, District- Patna 800020. 3. Amarnath Prasad, S/O Shri Yadunandan Prasad, R/O Purani Kankarbagh, Gatge No. 15, P.O.- Lohiyanagar, P.S. Kankarbnagh, Distt- Patna-800020. 4. Ajit Kumar, S/O Shri Ramlal Ram, R/O New Capital, Dhobi Ghat, Bailey Road, Hartali More, in front of Pant Bhawan, Rajak Samiti, P.S.- Sachivalaya, Distt-Patna. 5. Rajesh Paswan, S/O Shri Shiv Janam Paswan, Shri Babu Lal Madhukar, 105 Slum, Lohianagar, Patna, P.S. Kankarbagh, Distt- Patna. 6. Sunita Murmu, W/O Shri Babulal Taddu, Presently residing at C/O Meenu Devi, Mohalla- West Saristabad, Opp. Devi Asthan, P.O. Anishabad, P.S. Gardanibagh, Distt- Patna. 7. Sanjay Kumar Choudhary, S/O Shri Mahavir Chaudhary, 181 B, S.K.Puri, P.S.- S.K.Puri, Distt- Patna, Presently residing at C/O Sanjay Kumar Jha, Flat No. 108, Kankarbagh, P.O.& P.S. Kankarbagh, Petitioner no. 3,5,6,9,11,12,16, respectively in writ petition/ …………..Petitioners. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar. 2. Acting Chairman, Bihar Vidhan Parishad, Patna. 3. Bihar Vidhan Parishad Secretariat, through its Secretary. 4. Secretary, Bihar Vidhan Parishad, Patna. 5. Deputy Secretary, Bihar Vidhan Parishad, Patna. 6. Mukesh Singh, S/O Sri Umesh Prasad Singh, Rental Flat No. 400, Kankarbagh Colony, Patna 800020. 7. Md. Wasim Raz, S/O Ataur Rahman, C/O Dromer A. Anjum Ismat Mansion, Samanpura, P.O. B.V. College, Patna-14. 8. Parmanad Kumar, S/O Sri Ayodhya Prasad Singh, R/O Old Jakkanpur, Bidhyanath Mahto Marg, Patna- 500001. 9. Baleshwar Prasad Singh, S/O Sri Parshuram Singh, R/O Purni Durga Asthan. Pureni durga Asthan, P.O, Sultanganj, Distt- Bhagalpur. - 2 - 10. Nikandra Kumar Singh, S/O Sri Jainandan Singh, R/O Vill- Pachkhanda, P.O. & P.S.- Masraph, Distt- Chapra (Saran). 11. Arjun Kumar, S/O Late Kapil Manjhi, R/O Road No. 8, First Floor, Rajkunja Kalyan Chhalijwar, Mahendru, Patna- 800006. 12. Prakash Chandra Mishra, S/O Late Bindeshwari Mishri, R/O Vill & P.O. Muraitha, Darbhanga. 13. Rohit Kumar, S/O Sri Ram Nandan Thakur, R/O Bhawanokhaj, P.O.- Navinagar, Distt- Aurangabad. 14. Dipendra Kumar, S/O Sri Bhuneshwar Diwendi, Assistant, College of Commerce, Patna. …….Opp. Parties. ----------- 3 23.03.2011 No case for review is made out because the Court is of the considered opinion that there is no clerical mistake or error apparent on the face of record. Learned senior counsel representing the petitioners of the review application submits that in similar circumstance this Court had allowed petitioners of C.W.J.C. No. 13677 of 2006 to pursue their review before the Chairman. Their case being similar even, they should be permitted to pursue their review. Let it be clarified and recorded as to the background under which the order under review came to be passed. When the writ application was taken up by the Bench of this Court an order passed in C.W.J..C. No. 6479 of 2006, was shown where the Court had categorically recorded that the appointments have already been cancelled by the legislative council and matter referred to the Vigilance to find out whether any offence under I.P.C. or Prevention of Corruption Act is made out. It was in this background that the Court decided to - 3 - dismiss the writ application stating that subsequent developments being what they are no interference in the writ application is required. Merely because the Court allowed some petitioners to pursue the matter in review which was pending before the Chairman of the legislative council it does not mean that a case for review of the earlier order of rejection is made out. Since the writ application has been dismissed in the above background which was not fully reflected in the earlier part of the order that cannot be a ground for review. Since there is no error apparent on the face of the record no case for review is made out. Accordingly this application is dismissed. Bhardwaj/ ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)