x IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminal Revision No. H9. F}. . . . /201 1 Agglicant (In Jail) Aged about 33 years, Occupation Labourer, R/o Village Gidha, Police Station 85 Tahsil Kharsia, Munu Ba'bu S/o Kushuwa Ram 0.“. NO.V? District Ralgarh (CG) Presemed by Shri mJlQM'..... . . 43x 35.11. .....«mm Dated ................. b VERSUS Respondent State of Chhattisgarh Through : Dietrict Magistrate, Raigarh, bistrict Raigarh (C.G.) CRIMINAL REVISION IINDER SECTION 39% READ WITH SECTION 401 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Single Bench @ I ”a mmwz, wwm’ {Haw . C—aRN 1193.}..u..."$1200 mm (WW) WWW Wm§§ {MW W 1).:airaqm $3 : Hen’bie Shri Manincira Mohan §hrivastava, J. 22-1 1-2Q11 Shri Manoj Jaiswai, cpunsei for SM Arvind Dubey, Panei Lawy< $‘nri Vined’Tekam, caunsei a; Dansena. Heard on E.A.No.2, app§§cafion L offence. The peiiiioner was pmsecuted 294, 323, 506 IPC on the aiiegatior: t also threaiened to km the commain assau!tzed' with :he heip of a red (we ’ic The maé enc‘sed in his conviction, aga aise disrni$sed vide 0mm dated 26/5. revision has been flied. During the pe as Ehe victim — Lakhaniai had ioinf O‘iTeE’me. §t §$ jaém‘iy submiited by ieaz’ne ‘for the v§ctim i'ha? the parties are {esid harmoaious reiations and aii kinds v maiaiained comiaizzy n aii waiks oi ii theiefcie, ihe viciim, a? his own free v to compoand the offence. i i the appiicani. 2r for the State. :pears on behalf ef the viciim — Lakhaniai ride? Section 3‘20 (8) CrPC for compouneing for commission of offence under Section hat on 18/0§i02, the petifioner abused and am and‘furi‘ner that fife complainani was which, the petitioner eustained some iniuryi inst which, an appeai was nied which was ’20117. Againsi'ti'se‘ order of conviction, inis idency of this revision, the petifioner as weii y moved an appiication for compoum’ing \ :f sonnsei for fne appiicant and the oourzsei ing in the same \ricinity and have developed 3f disputes have been resoiveo' and have ieir life. There is he enmity any more and iil, without any coercion or i re is inteneiing he, Hermie—Wu 4o—«2/20I 1—i,so,ooo, Deepii in View of the submissions maide by iearned counsei for the parfies and considering ihe contents in the applica be aiiawed. Atccrdingiy, the offence for w campounded resumng in acquitta! provisions of Secfion 320 ('3) of the Cri The revision is accordingiy aik back. tion for compounding, the appiicaticn has to vhich the peiitioner has been convisfed §s of ihe petitioner as prov§dec§ undei' the ”C. )wed. Records cf ihe Couri beiow be sent Sdl- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge we “.vm 21mmmm, mam-w: 4o—2/2al 1—1 ,5o,ooo. 3a wee-“2m, eeiwe, WW W WCXR’NQqOJ/H W200 ‘mW (tferhaga) m wfqwim mm am WW wa‘f § fwW