: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.43 OF 2009 Shyamsunder Dattaram Rane ... Applicant V/s. Dattatray Tanaji Pandam & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.R.P. Walvekar for Applicant Mr.R.D. Mishra for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: FEBRUARY 11, 2010 P.C.: 1. The civil revision application has been preferred against the concurrent findings of fact recorded by both the Courts below. The Courts have held that the plaintiffs-respondents herein had proved that the defendant applicant was in arrears of rent from 1.9.1977 to 31.1.1998 and that he was a defaulter within the meaning of section 12(3)(a). In my view, the Courts below have not committed any error by concluding that there was non-compliance of the provisions of law by the applicant. Both the Courts below have considered the fact that the applicant was in arrears of rent and therefore was not entitled to continue in the suit premises beyond 11.2.2009. : 2 : 2. In my opinion, there is no error committed by both the Courts below requiring interference from this Court in its revisional jurisdiction. Hence, the civil revision application is dismissed. 3. On the application made by the learned advocate for the applicant, the decree shall not be executed for a period of six months from today on the usual undertaking being furnished by the applicant and all the adults in his family within two weeks from today.