IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34220 of 2011 Dinesh Ray @ Dinesh Kumar Ray Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 17.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Frequent filing of bail petitions is depricated with no interval. F.I.R. is clear enough by one of the injured of two that petitioner was assailant of the deceased. No doubt, an attempt has been made to belie that statement by registering a Sanha. It is relevant to mention that accused of the case is Chaukidar, Sanha is to the effect that two drunken persons informant and deceased were found in injured condition on road, were taken to hospital and admitted there. Post mortem report speaks about injuries only that also brutally to the deceased and no presence of liquor. Witnesses are turning hostile that also goes against the defence to conclude tampering for which trial Court is to take effective action to prevent the same, but in any case petitioner is not entitled for bail. Accordingly, petitioner’s prayer for regular bail stands rejected. However, every attempt shall be made by the trial Court to follow the direction in Cr. P.C. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)