-HG—78 'S^ET "s)i<ii<n<<, 0ia1y-'i<o, fq<ni<H'4,< p*. A S^T^T ^il^if^ w!T?n^i%w^ WPfC Petitioner Respondeats 1. 2. 3. Mr. SK Gulia, eounsel fo^ Mr. AS Kachhawaha, Dy The petitioner has file^ direction to fhe respondents] petitioner, especiaUy fhe aiisw^r was declared "fail" iia Social ^iNwST tnt(?ff'? Tt^t Tf^R^R No.1183 of2009 Yogesh Kum.ar, S/o Shri Gyaa Dev Pandey, aged about 15 years, through his natural guardian niofher Sxut. MiAteshwary Paadey, W/o Shri Gyan Dev Paadey, aged about 38 years, R/o Villa^e Basapara, PO Gangoti, Police Statiou Surajpur, District Surguja (CG) -Versus- Secondary Chhattisgarh Board of Education, Raipur (CG) CoUector, Surguja, District Surguja Govt. Higher Secondai}7 School, Shiv Prasad Nagar, Surguja, District Surguja (CG) 236 of the Coastitution of India. fhe petitiouer. AG for the State. the iastant petition and prayed for to check fhe answer sheets of the r sheet of Social Science subject, as he :ience subject iu Class-X, High Scho_oi V'V.fW':' r^'^irqRTSf,'S^TRFTS', is.it-')iyy,< gn^rxR^Cpf^^) 2- I tVWfl 1 !3'<i VW- ^aifOTS'!^ Certificate Examuiation (10+2) 20CJ8, aud after revaluation also, he was declared as fail, Learued counsel for the p^dtioner subruits that the petitioner |was declared fail ia High School C^rti&cate Examiaation (10+2) 2008 iu Sanskrit (Generalj and Social Sci4nce subjecte. The petitioner appUed for revaluation and after revaluati^n, he was declared pass ia Sanskrit subject, but he was again declarejd faU ia Social Science subject. He further subniits that answer sheej-s of the petitioner of Social Science paper have not been properly val^ed aad ia fhese circuiastances, the respondents be directed to againj check tiie answer sheets of Social Science paper of the petitioner. | Heard leanied counsel for tl^e petitiouer. The copy of the aaswer sheejts of fhe petitioner has 'ah-eady been provided to him., which has beeti filed along with ttus petition as Aunexure P/3. The petitioner ha^ not deinonstrated in fhe petition as to how fhe aiiswer sheets ofAnne^sure P/3 have been wrongly valued. [There is no report froin aiiy expeijt examiner to show fhat fhe answer sheets of fhe petitioner have wr&ngly been checked. Thus, in fhe absence of any niaterial to show that fhe answer sheets of Annexure P/3 wei~e wrongly valued, no diredtion, as prayed for by fhe petitioner, icao. be issued to the respondents. Accordingly, the petition beinj jwithout substance is hereby dismi^sed at fhe adinission stage itself. Sd/- Dhirendra Mistira Judge HK^?^^ iT^T^TT^—FS/95—1 i /200S-—1l,(^!-Ot)0. ^l 1