IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.8386 of 2011 Rajesh Yadav @ Raj Kumar Yadav, Son of Shree Vakil Yadav, Resident of Village-Tajpur, P.S.-Ballia, District-Begusarai. …..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Advocate. For the State : APP. ---------------------------------- 03/ 21.09.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. Prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected earlier. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail primarily on the ground that Neel Kamal Yadav under identical circumstances has been admitted to bail. The petitioner is accused in a case which has been registered under Sections 302/34 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code against unknown. It appears that the case was almost at the stage of conclusion but the prosecution prayed that one Test Identification Parade chart should be proved as due to inadvertence that could not be brought on record. The petition was allowed. Now the defence has challenged that order in Revision Application before this Court. That is now being adjourned at the behest of the petitioner. 2 On one side the petitioner is causing delay in trial and on other side he is praying for grant of bail on the ground of delay. Considering this, I am not inclined to grant bail to the above named petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is again rejected. kksinha/- (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)