IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6454 OF 2010 Between : Syed Sirajuddin and others. ....PETITIONERS A N D The State of A.P. and another …RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6454 OF 2010 ORDER: This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioners seeking to quash the proceedings in F.I.R.No.66 of 2010, dated 29.06.2010, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Zaheerabad, Medak District. 2. When the matter came up for admission, this Court directed the learned Public Prosecutor to verify from the complainant whether the alleged offences are made out or not? 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that on earlier occasion also, the complainant lodged similar complaint and on filing Crl.P.No.2431 of 2010, this Court granted interim stay of all further proceedings, including stay of arrest and the said criminal petition is pending before this Court. He also submitted that even in the present complaint, there is no material to attract any of the offences punishable under Sections 447, 504 and 506 of Indian Penal Code as alleged in the complaint. 4. This Court perused the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent. The relevant of the said complaint reads as under: “ That recently I came to know that the above said unconcerned persons are threatening, harassing and always quarrelling with my bonafide purchasers with an intention to dispossess them from their peaceful possession. It is submitted that they are strangers to me and my purchasers and they are unconcerned persons to me and my family members and my bonafide purchasers. It is further submitted that the above said all the persons along with their henchmens repeatedly trying to interfere into my purchaser lands and disturbing their agricultural work and always they use to damage the crops and threaten them by way of illegal activities”. 5. This Court is unable to understand the stand of the complainant, who sold the property to other persons. Even according to the complainant, the said purchasers are in possession of the property. The present complainant, who is the vendor, lodged a complaint stating that the present petitioners are trying to interfere with the peaceful possession of the purchaser. But, there is nothing to show that the petitioners are interfering with the possession of the purchasers and trying to dispossess them from the said property. 6. Therefore, the present complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent is nothing but abuse of the process of law and only to humiliate the petitioner herein he has lodged the present complaint. This type of complaints should not be allowed to be continued. The learned Public Prosecutor also clearly submitted that the entire reading of the complaint does not disclose anything about the offences alleged and the 2nd respondent has no locus standi to lodge the present complaint. 7. In view of the above, the present complaint in F.I.R.No.66 of 2010, dated 29.06.2010, on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Zaheerabad, Medak District, is hereby quashed. 8. Accordingly, the criminal petition is allowed. _________________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO JULY 13, 2010. YVL