IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7243 of 2009 1. KOYALI DEVI 2. BIRA SAHNI 3. NAWAL SAHANI 4. MANJU DEVI 5. MADAN SAHANI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03/ 19.05.2009 Heard Sri Vijay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners and Sri Dasrath Mehta, APP for the State. The anticipatory bail petition has been filed, inter alia, also on the ground that the parties have compromised and in token of the submission Annexure-2 the copy of the petition seeking permission to compound the case has been filed. I direct the C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur to consider the compromise petition if the same is supported by the informant before him on appearance on the date the petitioners appear for bail and if the C.J.M. is satisfied about its genuineness, then he shall admit each and every petitioners to bail on execution of a bond to its own satisfaction in Vaishali P.S. Case No. 180 of 2007. This petition is, accordingly, disposed of. DKS/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)