^-1^^- <^> //!// ^^' '. E (S) No. $5^3 /2QQ9 RamSajiwanBaghelS/o Shri Chaitman Baghel, Age about 42 years, R/o Barsur, Godelamapara, District Dantewada (C.G) ^^•"" ^y,-' State ofChhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Bakward Class Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G) The Commissioner, Triba! Development Raipur (C.G.) The Secretary, MataRukamani Sewa Sansthan Samiti, Dimrapal, Tah. & District-Jagdalpur (C.G.) coNSTmmoN COURT OF CHHATT'ISGARH : PETITIONER RESPONDENTS WRiT,PETmON,!Si_NO,5359,GF 2009 Ram Sajiwan Versys State of Chhattlsgarh & .Others (Writ petitlon under Article 226 of the Coristltytion of Indla) Single Sench: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: - Shri S. P. Kaie, counsei for the petitioner. Ms. Smlta Ghal, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER(QRAU (Passed on thls 18th day of September, 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Tumane With the consent of iearned counsel appearing for the partJes, the petitlon 1s heard finaiiy. Learned counsei appearing for the petltloner submjts. the instant petltion Is squareiy covered by the decision of thls Court rendered sn Smt A. Lai'l v. of ChhattisGarh & Others1, thus the petltioner may be permitted to a representatlon to decide nis case in the iight of afore-stated decision, subject to verification asto whether the respondent No.3 is a Government aided school and the petitioner Is a teacher v4thln the sanctioned strength. Learned counsei appearing for the State submits that in the event, the petitioner makes .a representation, the same wii'l be considered and decided, in accordance iaw, a period of four weeks from the date of recelpt of the r$presentatlon. in viev^ of foregoing, accordlng to the iearned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothlng su'rvives In this petition for adjudication. Accordingiy, the Vi/rit petltion Is dlsposed of. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge "^ -^nn— 2007 (1)BU 265