IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16687 of 2011 AJIT YADAV, SON OF MATHURA YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 11.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. By an order dated 25.3.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. 8586 of 2011, the petitioner was refused bail but stating therein that he could renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It has been submitted that the charge has been framed by the order dated 24.4.2011 and, therefore, the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. Considering the same, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. IV, Jamui, in Sessions Trial No. 114 of 2011 arising out of Barhat P.S. Case No. 59 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the bailor shall also state 2 on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)