IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 8TH MARCH 2010 / 17TH PHALGUNA 1931 RP.No. 26 of 2010() ------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN LAA.1101/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS -------------------------------------------- 1. XAVIER,S/O.MAROTTIKKAL DEVASSY, PUDUKAD P.O.,THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. VINCENT,S/O.MAROTTIKKAL DEVASSY, -DO- -DO- 3. JOSEPH,S/O.MAROTTIKKAL DEVASSY, -DO- -DO- BY ADV. SRI.K.G.BALASUBRAMANIAN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2. MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. PUDUKAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, PUDUKAD P.O.,THRISSUR DISTRICT. SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C. KURIAKOSE & C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------------------------ CM.Appln No. 40 of 2009 & RP. No.26 of 2010 in CM.Appln. No. 1130 of 2008 in LAA. No. 1101 of 2008 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of March, 2010 O R D E R Pius C. Kuriakose, J. Delay is condoned without imposing condition since we are in a position to dismiss the R.P. This RP seeks review of a condition imposed by this court while condoning the delay caused in the matter of filing of LAA. No. 1101 of 2008 by the petitioners. The contention was that if the appeal is allowed and if the appellant becomes entitled for enhanced compensation such enhanced compensation will not carry interest otherwise admissible under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act during the delay period. We notice that LAA. No. 1101 of 2008 was dismissed by us. This condition has not become operative. RP is dismissed as unnecessary. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE ksv/-