1 Cri-A-170-11.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 170 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 171 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 200 OF 2011 Prtamod Shrivastav ... Applicant (Orig. accused) vs. Smt. Nirupa Ramsunder Iyer & Anr. Respondents ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 177 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINALAPPLICATION NO. 180 OF 2011 IN CRI. REVISION APPLICATION NO. 206 OF 2011 Pramod Shrivastav ... Applicant vs. Brinda Nathan & Anr. ... Respondents ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 181 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 182 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLN. NO. 211 OF 2011 Pramod Shrivastav .. Applicant vs. 2 Cri-A-170-11.sxw Pandurang Dhomase & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. Aniket Vagal,Advocate, for the applicant Mr.V.B.Konde Deshmukh, APP, for the respondent No.2- State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 6th May, 2011. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant. 2. The applicant, who is convicted in three different cases under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, seeks to file the Revision Applications along with the applications for condonation of delay and for bail. However, the learned Counsel concedes that previously this applicant had filed Revision Application Nos.292/2010, 293/2010 and 294/2010 challenging the conviction and sentence in the same three matters. However, those Revision Applications were withdrawn on 7.6.2010. As the applicant had previously filed Revision Applications challenging his conviction and sentence and those revision applications were disposed of as withdrawn, the applicant cannot file revision applications in the same matters second time. On this ground itself, all these Applications and the Revision Applications stand dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)