IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM NO. M-37894 OF 2010(O&M) DECIDED ON : 17.02.2011 Chuni Lal Thakur ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. R. S. Manhas, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Rai, AAG, Punjab. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been exonerated by the SHO. This fact has been admitted by the learned State counsel. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that in the FIR, it is no where mentioned that the petitioner has the knowledge that complainant is a member of scheduled caste. The petitioner is stated to be aged about 78 years. So, in view of the above, the order dated 23.12.2010 is made absolute. Disposed of. FEBRUARY 17, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE