1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Criminal WP No. 535 of 2010 Yashpal v. The State of Maharashtra and anr --------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. Mr R.M. Daga, Advocate for petitioner Ms B.P. Maldhure, APP for respondents Coram : A.H. Joshi and A.P. Bhangale, JJ Dated : 23.9.2010 1. We are prima facie of the opinion that the impugned order may be appealable. 2. Learned Advocate Mr R.M. Daga states that he would advise the petitioner to prefer an appeal, however prays that impugned order needs to be stayed for six weeks since the appeal will have to be filed along with application for condonation of delay etc. 3. Considering the facts of the case and particularly that the petitioner was not heard before passing impugned order, we are inclined to grant ad-interim stay of impugned order to the extent it relates to release of livestock for six weeks from today, and which we accordingly grant. 2 4. In the mean-time, petitioner may prefer appeal and may apply for stay pending application for condonation of delay and pending appeal. 5. With above directions, we dispose of the writ petition as withdrawn. Judge Judge joshi