THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 495 OF 2011 Dated: 25.02.2011 Between: Anaparty Veera Venkata Satyanarayana ..... Petitioner And Anaparty Triveni …… Respondent The Court made the following:- THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 495 OF 2011 O R D E R : The revision petitioner is the respondent in O.P.No.8 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Tanuku. The respondent herein/wife filed the said petition for divorce. Pending the said O.P., the revision petitioner/husband filed I.A.No.696 of 2009 under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for grant of maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month contending that the respondent/wife was in service and receiving good salary. After hearing both the parties, the Court below dismissed the said application by order dated 06.08.2010 and aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition is filed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the material available on record, I do not find any justifiable reason to interfere with the order under revision. As rightly held by the Court below there was absolutely no material to substantiate the plea that the respondent was employed. Moreover no case could be made out to show that the petitioner was unable to maintain himself. Hence, the petition was rightly dismissed and the interference by this Court is not warranted. Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. ____________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 25.02.2011 Ivd