IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 14937 of 2009 Between: Syed Afzal Mehi, S/o. Late Syed Yakoob, O/o. The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Now re-designated as Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt. of A.P. Rep by its Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Commissioner, MCH Building, Hyderabad. 3 The Labour Court No. I, Chandravihar Buildings, M.J. Market Road, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the orders passed in ID No. 191/2004 dt. 24th June, 2008 which was published vide GO Rt.No. 1596, dt. 22-7-2008 on the file of the 3rd Respondent - Court and declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and further direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service forthwith with all attendant benefits interms of Judgment in WP NO. 15650/2003 and batch, dt. 15-4-2008 Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA W. P. NO. 14937 of 2009 ORDER: 1 When the matter is taken for hearing, both the counsel represented that this matter is squarely covered by the order of a learned single Judge of this court in W.P.No.15650 of 2003 dated 15.04.2008 as confirmed by a division bench of this court in W.A.No.1118 of 2008 and batch dated 16.09.2008. 2 In the light of the said consensus arrived at between the parties, this court is of the view that the impugned order in this Writ Petition is hereby set aside and the respondent authorities are hereby directed to reinstate the petitioner and if thereafter, the services of the petitioner-workmen are not required, it will be open to the respondent authority to terminate his services in accordance with law. 3 Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. ------------------------- SRI T.G.K, J. 05.08.2009 Kvsn