Crl.M.No.M-33544 of 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-33544 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 6, 2010 Sat Pal .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.No.59605 of 2010 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-33544 of 2010 The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.119, dated 24.7.2010, under Section 420 IPC, registered at Police Station Dinanagar, District Gurdaspur. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully, including the impugned order passed by learned Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur, vide which application filed on behalf of the present petitioner for anticipatory bail was dismissed. Brief allegations against the petitioner-accused are that he made representation to complainant that he would get his daughter employed in Punjab police and for that he demanded Rs.4,00,000/- on the plea that some D.I.G. was known to him. Complainant paid Rs.2,50,000/- to the petitioner on 12.8.2005 and however, neither the daughter of complainant was employed nor the money was returned. The matter was got enquired into by Senior Superintendent of Police and the present case was registered only after conducting the enquiry. Hence, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of Crl.M.No.M-33544 of 2010 (O&M) -2- anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused. In view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner-Sat Pal for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 6.12.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge