BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.14298 of 2011 M.NAGENDRAN ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAYANOOR POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DIST IN CR.NO. 81/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.C.ARUL VADIVEL @ SEKAR Advocate For Respondent : MR. K.S. DURAIPANDIAN,ADDITIONAL PUBLIC POROSECUTOR PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the sole accused and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.10.2011 for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 376 I.P.C., and 3(2)(V) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act) 1989 in Crime No.81 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2.Heard Mr.C.Arul Vadivel Sekar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is an engineering college student and he was granted interim bail for enabling to attend his examination to be conducted from 16.11.2011 till 10.12.2011. He would further submit in his argument that the case was posted on 10.12.2011 and subsequently 12.12.2011 on those two days, the bar has boycotted of Court, the order of interim bail could not be extended. He would furth Zer submit that the investigation ought to have been completed since medical report has been obtained by the respondent police. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide condition likely to be imposed against the petitioner for the grant of bail. He would further submit that he prayed for extension of interim bail from 10.12.2011 till this date and also to grant for regular bail. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.The learned Government Advocate would submit in his argument that the investigation is pending even though medical report has been obtained and if for any reason, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, stringent condition may be imposed for the secured presence of the petitioner. 5.Considering the submission made on both sides, I could see that the petitioner is an engineering college student and the petitioner was granted interim bail from 14.11.2011 till 10.12.2011 and the case was posted on 10.12.2011 for adjudication on bail. But however, on that day, the bar boycotted the Court, the petitioner could not be represented. Similar event happened on 12.12.2011 and the case was posted today and the petitioner is an engineering college student and since medical examination were over already and investigation is awaiting the medical reports only and on considering the continuance of his studies, this Court is inclined to grant bail with stringent condition. Accordingly, the earlier interim bail is also ordered to be extended till today and the petitioner is directed to be released on regular bail on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District and on further condition that the petitioner should appear before the respondent Police daily at 05.30 p.m until further orders. sd/- 15/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAMADURAI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4 THE INSEPCTOR OF POLICE,PALAYANOOR POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 5 THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE, SUB JAIL, SIVAGANGAI. +1. CC to M/S.C.ARUL VADIVEL @ SEKAR Advocate SR.No.43796: DM::2011:DECEMBER:19:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14298 of 2011 Date :15/12/2011 2p:7c:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/