IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23447 of 2008 SURESH CHANDRA SHUKLA,SON OF LATE NAVEEN CHANDRA SHUKLA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-MUNDICHAK, R.B.B.S.ROAD, P.S. TILKAMANJHI, DISTRICT- BHAGALPUR. – PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, 2. BRANCH MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA, Dr. RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, KHALIFABAGH, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT-BHAGALPUR. -OPP.PARTY. 5 12.11.2008 Supplementary affidavit, filed today in court, is kept with the record. In the supplementary affidavit it has been disclosed that the copy of the original title deed of the property in question was deposited with Syndicate Bank subsequent to deposit of the original title deed with Union Bank of India and since Syndicate Bank was not satisfied with the copy of documents, the petitioner, borrower, has closed the loan account opened by him with Syndicate Bank upon satisfying the dues and claims of Syndicate Bank. A certificate to that effect has been issued by Syndicate Bank, copy whereof has been annexed to the supplementary affidavit. In the first information report Union Bank of India has reported that the original title deed of the property in question is lying with it. The allegation in the first 2 information report is that the petitioner submitted forged and fabricated title deed with Syndicate Bank. That being the situation, I think a case for grant of anticipatory bail has been made out. Let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within two weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in Kotwali P.S. Case no. 222 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down in section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Barin Ghosh, J.) AAhmad