IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.21270 of 1995 Between: G. Hanumantha Reddy, S/o. G. Narsimha Reddy, Advocate, R/o. 3-4-508, Barkatpura, Hyderabad-27. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Andhra Pradesh Advocates' Welfare Fund Committee, rep. by its Secretary, O/o. Bar Council of State of A.P., High Court Premises, Hyderabad. 2 The Chairman, Bar Council of A.P., High Court Premises, Hyderabad. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the Resolution dated 17th April, 1992 passed by the First Respondent's Committee not to admit Advocates aged more than 65 years as members of the Advocates’ Welfare Fund as without jurisdiction, illegal, and arbitrary. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.E.SAMBASIVA PRATAP Counsel for the Respondents: A.P. BAR COUNCIL The Court made the following : ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner represents that the cause in this writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become ‘infructuous’. No costs. ________________ (N.V. RAMANA, J) Date: 07.10.2004 Nsr. To 1 The Secretary, Andhra Pradesh Advocates' Welfare Fund Committee, O/o. Bar Council of State of A.P., High Court Premises, Hyderabad. 2 The Chairman, Bar Council of A.P., High Court Premises, Hyderabad. 3 Two CD copies.