IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1780 of 2010 DEEPAK SHARMA @ DEEPAK KUMAR SHARMA . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02 03.01.2011 Heard both sides. Petitioner, who has been declared juvenile in conflict with law, seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act. As per allegation in the F.I.R., he was found possessed with one country made loaded pistol and three live cartridges. According to the F.I.R., he was found aged about 18 years. On a claim raised by him he was declared juvenile on the date of occurrence. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that father of the petitioner who has affirmed the present bail application shall take the entire responsibilities with respect to the petitioner. It is next submitted that there is no criminal antecedent against him and that he is in custody since the date of occurrence i.e. on 06.06.2010. Having regard to the materials available on record, this Court directs release of the petitioner, named above, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court of Juvenile Justice Board, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with G.R. case no. 644 of 2010/J.J.B. no. 539 of 2010 in reference to Bikramganj P.S. case no. 110 of 2010, subject to the following 2 conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be the father of the petitioner. (ii) Father of the petitioner shall file an affidavit in the Court below to produce the petitioner on the date(s) fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (iii) During subsistency of the privilege of bail if the petitioner is found involved in any other criminal case, the same shall be treated as a breach of the condition entailing cancellation of bail. Sym ( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)