^"^., / H 5 ,/" ^^ ,/' IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P. N0. a^ W /2003 PETITIONER . v^^...^ •••::,°;$"^.^>"" <-^^; ^ RESPONDENTS : 1. South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Through " C}iief General Manager, South Eastem Coalfields Ltd. Hasdeo Area, ^O.South Jhagrakhand, Distt. Korea Chhattisgarh !:rl. Sub-Area Manager Soufh Eastem Coalfields Ltd.Rajnagar Sub-Area, RO. Rajnagar colliery, Distt. Shahdol (M.P.) VERSUS : 1 The State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary Deptt. of Home & Transport Secretariat, Raipur. 2. t . RegionalTransport Officer Shahdol 3. Addl. Regional Transport Officer, Ambikapur, Surguja ^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2f6/227^0F CONSTITUTION OF INDIA '?~7 ;^ / ./ XI-HC-22 's^r ';:3Trai^R, ^Tii^Ko, ^<ii<yy 3ffit?T' 'crsra? WWrIT 9bHI<sb Ic(^<yr< 20ft3» ^n^sXT fes <.. "y ^ ^S^aS ^^ak^R <if^d 22.7.2003 Petitioners by Shri P.S.Naif, Shrivastava, Advocate, Sliri Saojay K, Agarwal, D< oii behalf of Respondents No, 1 a4d Heard leamed counsel for gOl^lg th.e school bus having pegistratio|i used for canynig the scliool seised aiid lyiagwith fhe RespoiK^ Shri Aganval submits fhatj tlie seized bus as showu in Ann^ paad the vehicle caiinot be releasejl, Duriiig tiie course of tex is legaUy due agamst the pet^: to the petitiouer for depositiug tliat tax amouut Having llearA leamed coun^e to the facts and circunistaiices ol would be just aiid proper to pas; ^1<-iI<n^I1<i 'WTSf '9 fa^ <li^i^K '^3?rfNn^i?^ - ', Seuior Advocate with Shri Paiikaj puty Advocate General takes uotice 3. fljie parties. Shri Nair submits tliat thoubli the whole tax has been deposited, No, M,P,L, 8076 which was being childreu has beeu unuecessarily sutNo.S. the tax is stiU outstaiidmg agaiast 4xure P/1, unless fhe tax amiouut is subBilssioii Mr. Nair agreed that whatever ioner, if two moufhs tmie is graiited same, tlie petitioner will deposit tie el for the parties aiid haviiig regard tiie case I am of fhe opmion tilat it ajti order fh.at ifthe petitioner gives [^^(^ XI-HC-22 ^n^r'eBr Pnl^ ^n+ii^ <^t^a f-1 "\. 'S^f -^ww% ^til^^Ko, {"Si^i^^ 3n^?T 4?(<sb ^....j^. ^m^ii ^Hich 2003 f^re^t* 3ff^??f y^ff^ <itfiba —2. satisfac1|ion aa undertakisig to the satisfaci tliat wifhio. a period of two deposited with fhe Respoudent ejid if the petitioner fails to Bioiiths froni today fhen the fhe bus aiid take such p: available under tlie law, of Respondent No,3 to Uie effect JD.oiifbis fhe outstaDiding tsx will be ^To,3, the bus m questiou be releasecl dei)osit fhe t£ix withio. the period of two res^oiidcHt No,3 will be at tiberty to seize I'oceedmgs agamst the petitiouer as is Witli the above observatioti Uiis petition is disposed of C^rtified copy as per Rule^ €B i<?i'41<rit?TOrif *^ '^tA <f^4^t< ^ 3?iN r 3:nt^t Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge [^^3^