IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.W.J.C. No.740 of 2010 YOGENDRA SINGH, aged about 62 years, son of Late Triveni Singh, Village-Mehdauli, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Sub-Division-Teghra, District- Begusarai. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. The District Magistrate, Begusarai. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Begusarai. 4. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Begusarai. 5. The Officer-in-Charge, Bhagwanpur Police Station, Bhagwanpur, Begusarai. ---Respondents 1st Set 6. Mushaharu Paswan, son of Gyani Paswan 7. Gandari Paswan son of Gyani Paswan 8. Nanku Paswan, son of Mauji Paswan 9. Gauri Paswan son of Yugal Paswan 10. Aarti Paswan, son of Sukh Sagar Paswan 11. Rama Paswan, son of Gango Paswan 12. Sanjiv Paswan, son of Kokan Paswan All residents of Village-Noula, P.S Bhagwanpur, Circle-Birpur, Sub Divisional and District-Begusari. 13. Prem Mahto, son of Budhan Mahton 14. Medo Mahto, son of Jhingur Mahton 15. Anjani Mahton, son of Nokhe Mahton 16. Jhumar Mahton, son of Ramjee Mahton 17. Bdao Paswan, son of Budhan Paswan 18. Bija Paswan, son of Siya Paswan All are residents of Village-Makwa, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Circle-Birpur, District Begusarai. 19. Laxman Singh, son of Ramrup Singh 20. Ram Balak Sahni, son of Yugal Sahni 21. Mannu Mahton son of Baldeo Mahton 22. Bideo Mahton, son of Sohan Mahton 23. Dinesh Paswan, son of Tawalki Paswan All are residents of Village-Naula, P.S.-Bhagwanpur, Circle-Birpur, District-Begusarai. ---Respondents 2nd Set ----------- 2. 28.1.2011 A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents-2nd set are continuously disturbing the petitioner, who - 2 - was the bona fide purchaser of the land in question. It is submitted that the petitioner, however, has filed a civil suit vide Title Suit No.75 of 2010 as stated in paragraph 13 of the writ application. Learned counsel for the State submits that in view of the above, the prayer of the petitioner in this writ application is not justified. Considering the submissions of the parties, since the petitioner has already filed a civil suit for appropriate relief, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter. This writ application, accordingly, stands disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)