FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE L.P.A. NO.139 OF 2005 ------------------------------------:---------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s : orders. : ------------------------------------:----------------------------------- Mr S.S.Pakle, for the appellants. Mr M.S.Topkar, for the respondent. CORAM: V.G.PALSHIKAR & D.B.BHOSALE,JJ. DATED: 24.10.2005 P.C.: Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By this appeal, the appellants have challenged the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court. We have scrutinised the order impugned. There is no legal or jurisdictional error committed by the learned Judge. The learned Judge was exercising extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution and has declined to interfere in exercise of such jurisdiction. Such refusal to exercise extra ordinary jurisdiction cannot be termed as a jurisdictional error or a legal error. Hence, no interference is called for. The Letters Patent Appeal dismissed. (D.B.BHOSALE,J.) (V.G.PALSHIKAR,J.)