1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9288 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 9288 OF 2004 WRIT PETITION NO. 9288 OF 2004 Smt. Ukkuda Vilasini Ratnakar ... Petitioner Versus Tulinj Education Trust and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Limaye i/by Mr.N.R. Bubna for Petitioner. Mr. G.S. Godbole for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mrs. M.P. Thakkar, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 5. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & MRS R.S. DALVI,JJ. JJ. JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 23, 2005 DATED : NOVEMBER 23, 2005 DATED : NOVEMBER 23, 2005 P.C. . Rule. Heard forthwith. . It is the case of the Petitioners that though they are qualified and approved teachers, they are not being put in the scale as provided under the provisions of the M.E.P.S. Act and rules framed thereunder. . Considering the controversy, the petition can be disposed of by issuing following directions : 2 (1) The Respondent No. 4 to hear the Petitioner and the Management and any other party likely to be affected and thereafter to pass appropriate directions in the matter of payment of salary if the petitioner is entitled to. Even if the <Respondent No. 4 comes to the conclusion, that the pay scales have to be implemented, no interest will be awarded. . Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (MRS. R.S. DALVI,J.)