HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Divisioa Beach:- Hon'ble Stet T.P. Sharma 8s Hoa'ble Shri R.L.Jhanwar,JJ Fust Appeal W] No. 05/2009 APPELLANTS 2. 3. Sint, Shakun Bai, daughter of Dhani Ram Yadav, aged about 28 years, occupation - labourer. Minor Tushar, aged about 7 years, son of Manoj Yadav, Miaor Ku Ekta Daughte of Manoj Yadav, aged about 5 years, Minor Ku. Sweta (Sarita), daughter of Maaoj Yadav, aa.ed about 3 years, S.N. 2 to 4 are minors, through fheir natural guardiau - inother (Smt. Shakuii Yadav) AU are resident of Bajrangpara, Raigarh, Tahsil aad Distt. Raigarh (CG) Maaoj Yadav, aged about 30 years, son of Shri Bhogilal Yadav, occupation - Labourer, resident of Jagatpur, Raigarh, Tah. 85 Distt. Raigarh (CG) APPEAL UNDBR SECTION 19 OF THE PAMILY COURTS ACT» VERSUS NON-APPLICANT Appearance; Ms. Madhunisha Sin.gh, counsel for fhe appeUaats. Shri Manoj K. Sialia, counsel for the icspondent. Per T.P.Sharma, J. ORAL ORDER (04.08.2010) 1. During fhe course of arguiiients, counsel for fhe appeUaat seeks to withdraw the appeal ffled agauist fhe order dated 3.1.2009 passed in review petition No. 4/2008 wifh Uberty to file appeal 'A U 't. against ttie unpugned judgment dated 29.07.2008 passed by the ijudge, Family Court, Raigarh in. M.J.C. No. 14/2007 aad submits fhat fhe oider dated 16.04.2010 for custody of children with fhe niother to contmue for soinetune tiU she obtains appropriate order froni the AppeUate Court, 2. Appeal is disnussed as wifhdrawn wifh fhe aforesaid Uberty. However, considering the order passed by fhis Court on 16.04.2010, it is directed fhat order dated 16.04.2010 shaU be in force for 30 days. y ^ 3. Copy of flie impugned order be returued to the counsel for fhe appeUant only after submission ofPhotostat copy offhe satae. 4. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge Sd/- R.L. Jhaiiwar