1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2812 OF 2010 Sow. Chandrakala W/o Milind Gangawane.. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Election Commission, and others .. Respondents Shri A. R. Salve, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. T. Shelke, Advocate for the Respondents No. 1 and 2. Shri R. S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3. Shri D. R. Kale, A.G.P. for the Respondent/State. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 30TH MARCH, 2010. ORAL ORDER [Per NARESH H. PATIL, J. ] : . Heard. 2. The petitioner contends that she filed nomination form along with AB Form from Shivsena political party. One more candidate namely Pushpa W/o Vishwanath Chhadidar too filed 2 nomination form along with AB Form of Shivsena political party. By communication dated 22nd March, 2010, the District President of Shivsena addressed the communication to the Returning Officer, whereby nine names of persons who were authorized candidates of Shivsena political party were mentioned. Based on the same, the Returning Officer by an order dated 23rd March, 2010, accepted the petitioner's nomination form as an independent candidate. 3. The election process is already set in motion. Learned counsel Shri Shelke appearing for the State Election Commission submits that according to the election programme, today the symboles shall be allotted to the candidates. In the facts of the case, no interference is called for in exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] bsb/Mar.10