IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.10173 of 2010 ANJU KUMARI, W/O BIJAY PRASAD SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-PARSA, P.S.-BISFI, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI. ………………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHUBANI. 3. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, MADHUBANI. 4. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, MADHUBANI. ………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 25.02.2011 A supplementary affidavit has been filed by the petitioner enclosing an order of the Commissioner dated 17.08.2010 by which the revision of the petitioner has been dismissed as not maintainable. From the new Guidelines dated 14.06.2010, issued under the signature of Principal Secretary of the Department, it appears that, under paragraph 8, a specific provision has been made for a revision before the Divisional Commissioner against the order of the Collector passed in the appeal. The revision has to be filed within 30 days and the Divisional Commissioner, after hearing the parties, has to dispose of the same by a reasoned order within 60 days thereafter. Therefore, apparently, when the Commissioner rejected the revision of the petitioner by order dated 17.08.2010, on the ground that 2 the same was not maintainable, he had the power to entertain the revision under this new Guidelines. Therefore, the order of the Commissioner dated 17.08.2010 is set aside and he is directed to restore the revision of the petitioner, consider the same on merits, hear the parties and decide the same positively within the time frame fix in the Guidelines for deciding such revision. The writ application is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. If any appointment is made during the pendency of the revision of the petitioner, the same shall be subject to the final result of the revision. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)