1 SlMRl' ES °S^a?!r*, IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BJLASFUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0.Q^- OF 2011 PETITIONER : Srat. Kamla Bai, W/o Doman Ram, aged about 40 years, presently posted and working as Sweeper, District Hospital, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (CG). RESPONDENTS A^ •l' lU^-~ ^}-:^y..--"" %^".-"\^^ €C@?' .-•\'\3 o '^•^SA' ..•'' y^'. ,.-<^ Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department ' of Health & Family Welfare, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG). 2. Director, Health Services, Directorate, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG). 3. Chief Medical 85 Health OfBcer, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (CG). 4.~ CoUector, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (CG). 5. Civil Surgeon-cum-Assistant Chief Hospital Superintendent, Ambikapzir, District Sar^uja WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA •[f / '^ /' ~-:;ii>. , •^ "^ ?'B&. F •^o HTOH COIJRT OF CHHATriSGARH AT 'BITASPUR WBJT PETmON (S) No. 6177 of2011 ETmoi Siiit.. vrasus Sfate ofChhattisearh & Others. PRTTTIONRK WRIT PETITION (S') No. 6178 of2011 Doman Ram. VRRSDS State ofChhattisgarh & WRTT PE'IITION UNDER ARTIC1£_226OF THE C_ONSITn-nTON Q£LB'®IA s.-itia i c Present: Shri Saniav Patei wfth Shri J-itendra Shrivastava. Advocates .lor itie Shri Anm Sao, Goverament Advocate for the State/respondeiit.i ORBER ('ORA'I^ /T5.-~^-.-! ,-,^ 1'^®.-3.—..—PT^.-A.-.'k.^,.'^^•!l\ ^rasseG Gii i /' Gsy oi ucioosi, AUII ? 2. Since both the above •writ Detition involve similar facts and ouesticin of law. thus. thev are being disoosed of bv this common order. Lcamed counse! a.onearing for the oetitioners submite thM the petitioner {ia W.p.(S) No. 6177/2011), is worku-ig a.s Sweeper and the petitioner { in W.P.(8) No, 6178/2011} is working as Ward Bov workme at District^ Hosoital. Ambikaour. Both ofthem. beme wife and husband.. have been ared vide 15.07.2011 (Annexiire P/l) to Primary Health Centre, Tara, Premnagar and Primarv Health Centre. Pa.tora. Dorour. rBsocctivelv. on administrative erounds. Shri Patel fiirt.her submits that in view ofthe policy ofthe State which prescribes that 9.9 far as oossible. the husband and wife must be oosted at fee same nlace_ the both tfae "etitioaers oudit. to ha.ve been transferred oosted at the same pla.ce. 3. L<arned couasel aooearine for the State submits that if both the .e a. jomt representMion raisme ttieir gnevances, tfte same shall be considered and decided svmoatfaeticallv. ia a.0cordance with law rei its own merits. as exoeditiouslv as "ossible. oreferablv witlun a neriod offour weeks. 4. In view of the above; a.ceording to leamed counse! appearing for the petitioners, aothiiig survives in these petitions for adjudication. 5. Accordinelv. both the writ netitions are disoosed of with th aforesaid observation. Sd/- SATISH K. ANGNMORI Judge i\mit