^^ ^' iar 'FHE HIGH COURT OE-SHHATTISGaRH AT BILASPI3K WRir EETITION N0. ^ 7 'O OF 2004 fETiriOKER itiun*iinuir•»>^»i«) Paras &am, @ Bhulu Ram Sahu, Son of Sri Dukalu Rgm Sghu, aged about 54 years, working as a daily wager ( Meth } , r-esident of village : Bhoring, Poiice Station : Tumgaon, Tghsj-l : Mahasamund, District : Mahasa— mund { CgG. ) V E R S U S .J- RBSPONBEKIS f .^ '.^» .<?•' r.' The Sfcate o£ CHhattj-sgarh ,?-' through the Secret.ais',: ; Water Resource Deparfcmenfc,' D.iK,S.: Bhawan^ RaiPur C c.s«' ) t- / s:r .^;'Bha^'Ra^lc'SI..y.. .: 1 ^'/•^f / 2'* TheEngineerln,.Chief,;' Irriga-^ "^/^..** ^ fcjlon Depar"{;menfcj>? Rpid.pux'* ' •[- j^fy ^/^ tlop Deparj:menfc,! Raipur, Dlstt: Raipur ( C.G^ ) 3. The Chief Engineer, IK6<3aF-, Project, Raipur, Dj.s'fct ; Ra-i-Fur ( G.'3.: ) .: ' : :' ::;. t 4. Tte Executive Engineer,, KotiaE ] Projecfc, Bivision s iMatiasamuntai Distt : Mahasamund ( C.O'. ) ] 1 5. The Sub Dlvisional Offieer', KQdar Project, Wgfcer Resouree Sub Division s Mahasamund, Distt ; Mahasamuhd ( C;©,) 6. State o£ Madhya Pradesb; through the SeeretarYi, ;Wafcec Resouree Ilepartmerrfc, ! Valla)a/h Bhawan,' Bhspal ( M.P.:)i , i. ^^.-S^^SE.,2^£S.^SSS5—.SS.&22Z-2£-.^&-§2^SSSSi2i2S: •[ OS INDIA FOR^ISSHANGE G® iWRIT- INTHE NATHRE OS CSBS-B3RSKS. :I|IHui 11[•wr 11 n nn 11KiieMW^».iiiii»Wwciiif»tmiiciHrm•—min»*ifiirtnur»tn)u»MU»iiii iiBnniua—u•iiinKirinrKiiinnimnnr•itirnn iB'ns® t^nnilpi^ir'»KNT»h»lNrtKMWfir^r^ltflthiri liNH • '^'' •ssfff*frtitoiNN•*fl<i'nhar^t jia^hf^t: U. r — it ^ HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISOARH : NLASPUR Sinate Bench: Sati«hK.Aanihotri. J.O WRIT PETITION No. 3607 of 2003 Smt Sonmat Bal Vs. State of ChhatUsgarh and othsts WRIT PETITION No. 978 of 20ti4 Paras Ram @ Bhulu Ram Sahu Vs. State of ChhatUagarh and othera WRITPETITION No. 399 of 2006 BudhuRam Kewat Vs. State of ChhatUsgarh and others WRIT PETITION No. 398 ol 2008 Dayaram Sahu Vs. State of Chhattlsgarh and othere WRFT PETmON No. 400 of 2006 Phool Singh Sahu Vs. State of ChhatUsgarh and ottwrs WRIT PETITION No. 428 of 2006 Smt. Dukalhin Bai Shiha Vs. State of ChhatUsgarh and othere Present WRIT PETITION No. 397 of 2009 Durdeshi Ram Sahu Vs. State of ChhatUsgarhand othws WRIT PETITION No. 4076 of 2003 Keju Ram Jalswal Vs. \ State of Chhattisgarh and othere WRIT PETITION No. 1144 of 2004 Manrakhan Vs. State of Chhattiagarh and others Mr.V.K.Pandey & Mr.Sanjay K.Agrawal, leamod counset for the petitioner(s). Mr. Vivek Shanna, leamed Panel Lawyer fbr tha State of Chhtttsgarh. ORDER (Passed on 22nd September 2006) The petiUonere In this bateh of Writ PaUtions are woridng as casual labour gangs/Daily WageLabour. The date of retireinant was 55 years, as per circular dated 09/03/2000. The respondent/State subsequently by circular dated 16/08/2004 increased th«age of retlrementfrom 55 years to 60 yeare. Thls Court in W.P. No. 1914/2004 and other connectod matten has considered this dispute as to whether the casual labour gangs who have reUred on attalnlng the age of 55 yeare be ghmi the beneflt of ttie circular dated 16/08/2004 for the purpose of reUrement on attalning the age of 60 yeare. Leamed counsel for the peUUoner submits that thase petlttens are squarely covered by ordar dated 15/09/2005 passed by tMs Court hW.P. No. 1914/2004 and other connected mattere. Leamed counsel appearing for fte State has no objeeUon. '^^&y^-i Accordingly, the petttlons are allowed In tsnns of the order dated 15/09/2005 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 1914/2004 and other connected mattere. I—;—— i Sd/- j SatishK.Agnihotri Judge