IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR. CHHATTISGARH Contempt Petition No. HO /2004 PETITIONER Surendra Kumar Pandey. S/o. Shri S.S.Pandey, aged about 24 years R/o. Village Shankarghat, Tahsil— Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) p VERSUS 1. Shri P.C.Da1ai Secretary, Department of Tribal Education, Govt. of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Shri Mahipal Singh Dhruv Commissioner, Scheduled Caste Scheduled Tribe, O.B.C. & Minor Welfare Department, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Shri Manoj Kumar Pingwa, Collector, Sarguja (Ambikapur) Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) 4. Shri C.R.Miri, Block Education officer, Education Department, Ambikapur, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE §15 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTIONF12 OF THE? CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT FOR INITIATING CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS /CONTEMNERS ,FOR NOT COMPLIANCE. THE COURT ORDER DT. 28%.2003 PASSED IN W.P. NO.1§47/2002. RESPONDENTS ‘ : W um WWMMwHw W 209 m mmzEwm mmm ‘ $a1itwam 12/05/2004 5hri MK, Sinha, 1ear'ned counse! f9r- ‘rhe pamoner. Shri N.K. Agrawal, !ear‘ned Dy‘ Ad‘VocaTe 6eneml, for The 51'a1'e. The appliza-Hon for urgen‘t hearing is allowzd. Heard. ‘ Learned counse! for- ‘rhe pe+i+ion r- submifs fhuf fhe pefifioner has iléd a writ petifion No.1247/2002 again 1‘ The arbitrary and mega! action of he r‘éspnndenfs in mf deciding fhe re resen‘l‘m‘ian filed by him. The said i ‘ri+ pe'l'i‘i'ion was‘ disposed of on 2B 4-2003 wi+h a dircc+ion +o +he eii'i‘ianet' ‘io make defaiied represent fion ‘ia 'ihe Competem Authorify ii’hin 15 days from ihe derie of fhai‘ 0rd r and on such represen‘i‘a’iion being iled The ’competen? aufhor‘ii'y shaii deci e fhe same by passing a reasoned rder/in accordance with law wifhin two onfhs from fhe da‘ie of produciion 'F reyrcsen+a+ion Learned counsel for- he pefifioner furi-har submi‘i‘s +hoi' ‘ he representation along viii-h copy of he order was made on 12-05-2003 e:for-e i'he Coiieci’om Sargqja‘ and oi‘ er- r'epresenfoi'ions were made on :8/7/2003, 30/12/2003 and 12!02/2 E04, respeefively. Learned counsel _ i ubmifs Thai inspire of The receipf of nae represenfafione, fhe Compe‘renf i éAufhorify has no? iaken any ac'iion and m any case fhe fo‘ie of fhe some hos Em? been communicafed fa him. i \ \ When fhe direcfions are issued by ihe Cour-i, fhe auihorifies musi‘ l amply wifh ihe same and if 'ihere is any :difficulfy i1- is open To ihem to seek \my \ \ \ \ \ WW%@W *wf-awme :sar‘l‘ has been done. Learned caunsei for fhe pefifi ngr $0 supply copy of The pea‘iiion laiong wifh annexures 1'0 Shri MK. A9 uwai, Learned Dy. Advoca'i'e €eneral ‘who is presenf in the Court an circumgfances of ihe case and fine. ma‘l'erial available on racord +hls C ur+ is of ‘H'Ie opinion +ha+ insicad of procefdmg , If Is approprm‘e To give one mere oppor'runiiy fa fhe Compeienf Aufhori‘y and ask him To decide 'Hne some within o period of Six weeks from The ate of reaeipf of copy of This order Ordered accordingly H aiso forward a copy of ‘rhis order To 1173 concerned au'rhorh‘y and also i sue appropriate instructions in This regard If Is made clear fha'i' If 1' is order is nof complied wrl'h 'i‘he Compefem‘ Aufhorify’vdum’llybe held resplnSIble na‘i’ only for The earlier order bu? even for fhis order aiso and m accordance wwh iaw. i v u ‘ Having fhus considered fhe fac Learned Dy. Advoca‘fe Generai Ihai' case he shall be dealf Wifh m E Wifh This observafion, ihe pefirfon is disposed of a? This siege. Cerfified copy as per r'u‘es. E a,” Fakhruddin Acting Chief Justice ‘i fime ar' bring The difficuify +0 The no‘rléce of fhe Court buf nofhing of 'i'his wXC . . . . s d kM o