IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 18337 of 2002 Between: K.V.S.S.Sambhu Prasad S/o.Late Gunneswara Rao R/o.Palakole West Godavari District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Mandal Revenue Officer on Deputation to A.P.S.F.C., Eluru West Godavari District. 2 Branch Manager A.P.State Finance Corporation Narasimharaopeta, Eluru, West Godavari District. 3 A.P.State Finance Corporation Rep.by its Manaing Director Chirag Ali Lane Hyderabad ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in issuing impugned notice No.A.F.C/SDT/R.R.Act/2002-2003/1685. dt.17-7-2002 as illegal, null and void arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Arts.19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and for a Consequential order directing the respondents to drop all further proceedigns including attachment of properties and movables of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.CH.DHANAMJAYA Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: MR. SREEMAN NARAYANA ( SC FIR APSFC) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 13180 of 2003 O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to raise his objections to the impugned letter before the 3rd respondent - authority. Permission is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is open to the petitioner to raise his objections to the impugned letter before the authorities concerned. No order as to costs. _______________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY,J 10th June 2009 YVL