IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 21ST DECEMBER 2010 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 9970 of 2006(J) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- JAIBU MATHEW, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O.MATHEW, VISAKAMTHARA VEEDU, KUMARAKAM VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. 2. THE R.D.O. KOTTAYAM. 3. E.J.DAVID, EDASSERIYIL VEEDU, ANGAMALY KARA, ANGADIKADAVU VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK, MANAGING DIRECTOR, EDASSERIL TOWERS PVT.LTD., ANGAMALY. 4. JOY ITTOOP, MANDIRATHIL, PADINJATTUM BHAGAM KARA, KUMARAKAM P.O. KOTTAYAM. ADV. SRI.P.N.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No.9970 of 2006 ================== Dated this the 21st day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T This writ petition comes up in the defects list today. The defect is that notice to the 3rd respondent has not been served. This writ petition was earlier posted before the Registrar (Judicial) on 13.12.2010 for defects. The petitioner did not appear before the Registrar (Judicial). That is why the writ petition is posted in the defects list of this Court today. When the matter was taken up today, none appears for the petitioner. The defect is also not cured. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge