IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 6TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 17TH MAGHA 1928 OP.No. 34206 of 2002(V) ----------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P.V.KOCHU, S/O. VARATHAPPAN, PULLIKKOTTIL HOUSE, MASJID ROAD, WADAKKANCHERRY, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU SRI.M.GEORGE THOMAS RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROADS AND BRIDGES, THRISSUR. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, ROADS AND BRIDGES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ROADS AND BRIDGES), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER- ADV. SMT.SMITHA THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Original Petition 34206/2002 ORDER ON CMP NO. 57806/2002 IN Original Petition NO.34206/2002 DISMISSED. 06/02/2007 SD/- (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH (3 IN NOS.) SHOWING THE LIE OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2 COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 22/10/2002 IN Original Petition NO.16268/2002 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. EXT.P3 COPY OF ORDER NO. A8-1166/2001 DATED 24/10/2002 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. //TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE. jg C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------- O.P. No. 34206 of 2002 ------------------------- Dated, this the 6th day of February, 2007 J U D G M E N T The petitioner’s property was acquired at high cost of Rs. 24 lakhs for construction of a road. However, petitioner’s grievance is that since the road was constructed by digging and levelling the land, petitioner’s property is now at higher level. He therefore demands construction of a road to his property at Government cost. I do not think petitioner can demand respondents to construct road to his property. It is up to the petitioner to construct road or path way required for his property at his cost. O.P. is therefore dismissed. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.) jg