IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17095 of 2011 Pappu Pandit Versus The State Of Bihar 2 27.06.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 364, 307 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The informant's grand son was abducted and subsequently, he was found in injured condition, though the accusation has been levelled against three F.I.R. named accused persons on the basis of the claim of the informant that the injured by writing suggested the name of the accused persons. The occurrence is of 29.12.2010 whereas, the 164 Cr.P.C. statement was recorded on 22.01.2011 when it was specifically alleged that Narayan Tanti and some unknown persons who happens to be the parental brother of the victim took the victim and made assault. It is alleged against Kapil Tanti that he along with this petitioner threw away the victim when the main accused persons fled away. 2 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the main accusation of abduction and causing injury is against Narayan Tanti and Kapil Tanti who has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the informant that in fact there is no land dispute with the petitioner. Considering the delayed lodging of the F.I.R. and the fact that the thrust of accusation is against Narayan, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 350/2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)