IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2008 / 30TH ASHADHA 1930 WP(C).No. 19855 of 2008(L) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. MARIAMMA CHACKO THEKKEMUIYIL HOUSE, VENKUIRINJI P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 2. BAIJU JACOB, THEKKEMUIYIL HOUSE, VENKUIRINJI P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. BINU JACOB, THEKKEMUIYIL HOUSE, VENKUIRINJI P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.HARIDAS RESPONDENTS: ---------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO DEPARTMENT OF ROAD TRANSPORT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM. 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION (CBE) LTD ERODE, COIMBATORE. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 19855 OF 2008 L ==================== Dated this the 21st day of July, 2008 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that they have obtained Ext.P1 award in OP(MV) No.624/2000 against the 3rd respondent. The complaint is that even after recovery certificate was issued by the Tribunal, effective steps have not been taken by the respondents for recovering the amount that is due. 2. If as stated by the petitioners, Ext.P1 award has become final and binding on the parties, there is no reason for inordinately delaying the recovery, especially when the Tribunal has issued recovery certificate in this behalf. 3. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing that the 2nd respondent shall take effective steps for ensuring that the amount due in terms of Ext.P1 is recovered, by taking appropriate action in this matter. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp