IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc No. M-33708 of 2008 Date of decision : 30.05.2009 Nikku ....Petitioner V/s State of Punjab ....Respondent BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. A.S. Badal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG Punjab. RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that pursuant to order dated 22.12.2008, petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, submits that he is not in a position to affirm the factual averment made by the counsel for the petitioner and prays that in case averment made by counsel for the petitioner turns out to be false, liberty may be granted to the State to move an appropriate application for seeking custodial interrogation of the petitioner. In view of this, the instant petition is allowed. The petitioner is granted the concession of anticipatory bail subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. However, liberty is granted to learned counsel for the State as prayed for. 30.05.2009 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE