AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1306 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2279 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2280 OF 2007 Shankar Laxman Pingle & Anr. ... Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Mr. Nitin Mulye h/f Mr. G.S. Godbole for the petitioner. Mr. P.J. Thorat for the applicants. Mr. A.I. Patel, A.G.P. for the State. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 25, 2008. P.C.:- Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has instructions to withdraw the petition. He has tendered in the court affidavit of petitioner 1 to which letter dated 18/1/2008 sent by respondent 4 is annexed. The said letter states that respondent 4 is agreeable to grant the demands of the petitioners as stated in their letter dated 18/1/2008 (Ex-A to the affidavit). However, in AJN 2 view of the pendency of this writ petition and the stay order passed therein, they are unable to do so. In view of this, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach this court in case respondent 4 does not comply with this letter (Ex-A to the affidavit). Hence, petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Needless to say that all connected civil applications stand disposed of. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.]