HIGH COSR? Q? CHWATTESGIKRH AT BILASPUR ijiWSiQN BENCH CGRAM: HSN’BLE SHR! RAJEEV GU?TA, CJ, HGN’§LE 3%RE $UN§L KUMAR S3NHA, J. Misc, Appeal Na. $§$ oi‘ 26% ilgpellant Nationa! Insurance Company Ltd., DefendantNo3 Burg, Thraugh Branch Manager, Biéaspur (CG) VERSUS Rgsacndams 1 _ Mani$h Kumar, 2O year$, S/G Shrila! Sa'rthi, R/o Turkaripara, near Bamieshwari Mandir, Ward No.8, Kha§ragarh, Rajiiandgaon (CG) De§endantNov1 2. Narad Ram, 3O years, S/o ~ ' Ramdu¥are Gadewai, R/o Shanker Nagar, Burg (CG) (Driver) Defendant N112 3. Riyazuddin, 28 years, S/o Badruddin Qijefeshi, R/o Keiabadi, Durg (CG) (Owner) Mm; Appaai under $ection 1?:3 of the Motor Vehicles Act Present: Shri B‘N. Nancie, §earned counsel forihe appeiiant. OR§3ER (28m septembey, 2010) The foi‘lowing order of the Court was apassed by Ragaav Gupia, CnJ, 3m 3N. Nande, Earned counse! for the appellant, in View of th'e farit ihat the deposit receipt tias not been fried by the appeliant/ k} mSurance Company though a period of more than seven years has e£aa5sd since fiiing cf the appeal, seem permissmn to withdraw the gmeai fiied by the appeHant/ insurance Campany against the impugned award dated 28.G2!2003, passed by the Additionai Motor Accident Ciaims Tribunai, Khairabagrh, District Rajnandgaon, in Ciaim Case Nona/1999, with the iiberty of fiiing another appeal against the impugned award as and when the deposit receipt is macie eveiiabie by the appeiiant/ insurance Company. 2). Permissien granted. 8) With the above liberty, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4) Regietry is directed t0 return certified copy of the impugned award to learned couneel for the appellant immediately. J%% l sci/- i ‘ l sw- Chief Justice subbu l SunilKumar Sinha k l Judge /// l l F :‘;g6: