IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15534 of 2011 Arbind Kumar S/O Late Chandradeo Roy R/O Vill.- Turki, P.O.-Turki, P.S.- Kurhani, Distt.- Muzaffarpur--------------------- -------------------------------------------Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Principal Secretary Primary Education, Govt. Of Bihar 2. The Director, Bihar Educational Council/Serva Siksha Abhiyan Directorate Human Resources Development, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna 3. The District Magistrate-Cum-Chairman Bihar Education Project (Bep), Muzaffarpur 4. The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur 5. The District Programme Officer, Bihar Education Project (Bep) Sarva Siksha Abhiyan, Muzaffarpur, As The Then District Superintendent Of Education, Muzaffarpur 6. The Block Education Extension Officer-Cum-Co- Coordinator Block Resources Centre, Kurhani (Turki), District – Muzaffarpur--------------------------------Respondents ---------------------------------- 2 9.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Keeping in view the declaration of law made by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Uma Devi, no direction can be given specially to the Bihar Education Project for regularisation of the service of the petitioner. There is no dispute that petitioner has been paid his rightful claim as a daily wager for the period he has worked. The respondent has done away with any engagement on daily wages. This is matter of policy decision of the respondents which cannot be looked into by this Court. Yet another dimension is that the petitioner has made an application for substantive appointment against the so called advertisement. If that be so the same will be considered on its own merit in due course by the respondent, otherwise this writ petition is dismissed being devoid of merit. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)