IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 WP(C).No. 30548 of 2009(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- P.K.MAJEED, PARUTHIKKAL VEETTIL, WARD NO.12, HMT COLONY P.O.,KALAMASSERY. BY ADV. SMT.CAROLIN SINDHU VAZ SRI.P.JINISH PAUL SMT.S.SEEJA RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE KALAMASSERY MUNICIPALITY REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, KALAMASSERY. 2. THE SECRETARY, KALAMASSERY MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, KALAMASSERY. 3. MARTIN A.JERALD, S/O.LATE JOSEPH, 41/2064 KALABHAVAN ROAD, KOCHI-18. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM DT. CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD. R1, R2 BY ADV.M.K.ABOOBACKER R3 BY ADV.S.SHANAVAS KHAN SMT.S.INDU R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.30548 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT Following earlier orders, learned Government Pleader has placed before me a report of the Director of Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau. That report dated 17.11.2009 contains a report of the Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau, Kochi, dated 12.11.2009, as also a quick verification report No.QV/06/09 CRE dated 11.11.2009, made by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau, Central Range, Ernakulam and appendices thereto. The three officers against whom departmental action has to be taken are Sri.K.Jayakumar, Building Inspector, Kalamassery Municipality and Sri.K.S.Rateesh, Municipal Engineer, Kalamassery Municipality for recommending partial occupancy certificate No.XI/375-H and IX/375-J before completing construction and departmental action has to be taken against Smt.Leelamma Mamman, Revenue Inspector of WPC.30548/09 2 Kalamassery Municipality, for assessing the building, giving number and for collection of tax without properly inspecting the site. Taking that report into consideration, this writ petition is dismissed leaving the third respondent to proceed with his activity as may be permitted by the municipality. The files submitted by the learned Government Pleader are returned herewith. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge. kkb.1/12.