1 D.B.Civil Special Appeal(Writ) No.259/2007 University of Raj. V/s Nandan Kumar & ors. 2.9.2008 Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Narayan Roy Hon'ble Mr.Justice Mohammad Rafiq Dr.Y.C.Sharma for the appellant. Smt.Vijay Sharma for the respondent-petitioner This appeal has been filed at the instance of University of Rajasthan against judgment dated 17.11.2006 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court whereby writ application of the respondent- petitioner was allowed and the appellant-University was directed to declare result of the petitioner- respondent and also to pay him cost of Rs.30,000/-. Learned counsel for the appellant has argued that the respondent-petitioner had passed the intermediate examination conducted by the Board of Intermediate Education Council, Patna and that qualification was recognized by the Board of Secondary Education of Rajasthan. Some time was however consumed in making verification of that qualification. But, the respondent-petitioner filed writ petition in which though there was direction to permit him to provisionally appear in the examination of BA Part-I and thereafter, in BA Part-II, but there was no direction to declare his result. Learned counsel referred to the judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court dated 22nd Feb.2005 passed in earlier writ application of the respondent-petitioner and submitted that it was due to misreading of that judgment by the officials of the University that the respondent-petitioner was although allowed to appear 2 in BA Part-III, but, his result was not declared since there was no direction for declaration of result. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent and perused the impugned judgment, we find that the learned Single Judge of this Court noticed the clarifications issued by the Vice Chancellor of the University itself by order dated 13th Oct.2003 in which it was stated that intermediate examination conducted by the Board of Intermediate Education Council, Patna has been recognized as equivalent to 10+2 examination. The judgment dated 22th Feb.05 by which earlier writ application of petitioner-respondent was allowed in- fact was based on a still earlier judgment of this Court in Ranveer Singh & ors. V/s University of Rajasthan & ors. (S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2404/02 decided on 11.11.2003). There was therefore no question of misreading or misinterpretation of the judgment because writ petition was allowed in terms of aforesaid judgment with the directions to the appellant to now permit the petitioner-respondent to prosecute his study and also permit him to appear in BA Part-III examination. And on earlier two occasions, the respondent- petitioner was allowed to appear in BA Part-I and BA Part-II examinations under the orders of the court. On facts, therefore, we find that there was no justification for the appellant-University not to permit the respondent-petitioner to appear in the examination and repeatedly require him to approach this Court even in the face of clarifications issued by its Vice Chancellor by order dated 13.10.2003. 3 We, therefore, do not find any good reason to take a different view than the one taken by the learned Single Judge of this Court. There being no error or infirmity in the order impugned, this appeal is dismissed. However, on the request of learned counsel for the appellant, we extend the time limit upto 30th Sept.2008 for compliance of the directions issued by the learned Single Judge of this Court. (Mohammad Rafiq)J. (Narayan Roy)C.J. Parmar