wp3200-11.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3200 OF 2011 Smt.Sitabai Mohan Bavise .. Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Ulhas Naik for petitioner Mr.Ryan D'Souza & Vasim Shaikh i/b. Pravin Mehta & Mithi & Co. for respondent Nos. 2 to 5 Mr.S.N.Bhosale, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 6,. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 5th August 2011. P.C.: 1] Since the petitioner has already approached the MRT, interest of justice would be served if this petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to pursue the said proceedings and apply for appropriate interim and final reliefs therein. It is prayed that the ad-interim order be continued so as to enable the petitioners to seek interim stay before the MRT. This request is opposed on behalf of contesting respondents and it is stated that ad-interim order has been wp3200-11.doc 2 passed despite petitioners not disclosing the material and relevant facts, including that she was unable to obtain any interim orders in the earlier round. It is not for me to go into these aspects. Once the petitioner has alternate and equally efficacious remedy available to her in law, the petitioner can obtain all interim and final reliefs before the MRT. 2] However, ad-interim order is continued only for a period of two weeks. If the petitioner is unable to obtain any interim orders, it would be open for the respondent Nos. 2 to 5 to take such steps as are permissible in law. It is clarified that grant of ad-interim order as well as its continuance is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of both sides. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)