IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 9512 of 2001 Between: Koyyada Saroja, W/o. K.Cheralu, and Rpo. 3-126, Pasra, Govinda Rao Pet Mandal, Warangal District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Circle Inspector of Police, hanamkonda Police Station (Town), Warangal District. 2 The Sub-Inspector of Police, Hanmkonda Police Station, Warangal District. 3 Smt. Razia Sultana, W/o. M.A. Waheed, R/o. H.No. 3-4-318, New Raipura, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 4 Md. Afgal, S/o. Shaik Hyder, R/o. H.No. 3-4-319, New Raipura, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, Declaring the action of the Respondents 1 and 2 in interfering with peaceful possession and construction work of the Petitioner H.No. 3-4-318 situated in S.No. 1253, New RAipura, Hanamkonda, Warangal District pursuant to the injuction order dated 12-4-2001 made in I.A.No. 371/2001 in O.S.No. 482 of 2001 on the file of the court of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal is arbitrary, illegal and inspite of the fact that the subject matter of the land in the suit filed by the Respondents 3 & 4 is entirely different and consequently direct the respondents not to interefere with the peaceful possession and construction work of the Petitioner made in H.No. 3- 4-318, situated in Survey No. 1253, New Rayapura, Hanamkonda, Warangal District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.MURALIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents 1 and 2: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents 3 and 4: None appeared The Court made the following : ORDER: None appears for the unofficial respondents. A counter has been filed on behalf of the second respondent. The only grievance of the petitioner is that under the guise of interim order obtained by the third respondent in I.A.No.371 of 2001 in O.S.NO.482 of 2001 on the file of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal, the official respondents are interfering with the property of the petitioner bearing H.No.3- 4-318 situated in Sy.No.1253, New Raipura, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. This Court while admitting the writ petition granted interim direction directing the respondents 1 and 2 not to interfere with the construction if the said land is within the scheduled limits of I.A.No.371 of 2001 in O.S.No.482 of 2001. The respondent No.2 filed a counter stating that the respondents are not aware about the civil disputes between the petitioner and the respondents 3 and 4 and they have nothing to do with the same and they never interfered with the civil disputes. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the categorical denial of the averments made in the counter that the official respondents 1 and 2 never interfered with the civil disputes of the petitioner and the petitioner was never called to the police station, I am of the opinion that it cannot be said that the police interfered with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:09.04.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KRD}