(I‘Izald Q3 m THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P5No. H5; mow ($.33) (S’Iiit. ‘Kalpana Bajpeyi W/o Shri J.K. Bajpayi, aged about 45 years, R/o Vivekanand Coiony Raipur, Nakabila (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1 State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretary , Education Department , D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Director of public Instruction Pensionbada Raipur (C.G.) : \\ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226OF THE COUNSTITUTION OF INDIA @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATIISGARH AT ETI ASPUR w. P. (5) No. 1161 of zoo). Pefi‘rioner : 511112 Kalpnna Bajpayi Versus Respondenfs S'l'ai'e of Chhu‘t1'isgarh (31 anofher Singla Bench: Hon‘ble Mr. Jusfice Sotish K. Agnihofri. Mr. Kumaresh Tiwari, Advocate for the pmitioner. Smf. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govemmanf Advoca‘re for 1+1: Sm're/respondems. ORDER (Passed on fhis 28'“ Day of February, 2007) learned counsel appearing for 1he pe'rifioner submm inc? fhe pefi‘rioner is working as Upper Division Teacher. The petitioner ob‘rained B. Ed. Examination cer‘l’ifica'fe on 2.9.1995, on his own expenses. Learned counsel appearing for the peii'lioner submi‘rs Tho-r The question involved, herein asto whe'rher 'lhe teacher, who obtained B. Ed. Examination Ceriificai'e on his own expenses is en'l'i'l'led 1'0 fwo advance increments. According 1'0 learmd counsel for The petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to two advance increments in view of the decision of this Court in the ms? of Yashwant Kumor Bharadwai Vs. Mmicipal Corporation, Dwg and another {2006 (H) MPJR-CG 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwoj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who had obtained B. Ed. /8.T.I. Examination‘Certificate on their own @ expanses, are covered by 'the circular da‘red 24.12.98 issued by the Sfnfe éovemmen‘r of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Learned counsel for The petitioner further submits ‘l'hof 1he fads and ques‘rion of law involved in fhe presenf case are squarely covered by decision of 'I’his Couri in 'l‘he case of Yashwanf Mar Bharadwq' Vs. Municipal Corporation, burg and anorher (SupraL 1'0 which learned counsel appearing for fhe responden‘l's fairly concedes and agrees wi‘l’h flue avermen'l’ made by learned counsel appearing for fl'Ie pefifioner. 5. Accordingly, fhe writ pe‘rifion is allowed in ferms of fhe order passed in fhe case of Vashwanf Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation. Durg and anal'her (Supra), subject to verificafion of 'lhe fact as to whe'lher The petitioner has acquired B. Ed. Examinai'ion Cer'l'ifioafe on his own expenses as per 'l'he circulars dated 24.12.1998 a) 8i 1.3.1999 and further whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs, l Sdl- l l Salish K. Agnihotri l i l Judge Subhash ‘