>IVE3i| .reirfr-i iiBi^nSI •Uf Si"> TITinN! s ^ s S^Krf'E'^1 No.321 Aadim Jati Sewa Sahkari C--'in!^,'nSi'S'nE ^eaiu^s^i, ?""•/-i"i.'~ i ?"Lt rr C5/T;Et^,; : ^5Up'Klpul , r\S3JpUI Tahsii - Rajpur, District - Surguja (C.G.) ThrQugh: Saies man suthorized by Manager, Mohar !ai,S/o Shri Parlok Ram, Ag°( about 44 years, R/o Viilage Burbuspur, Tahsii Distt- Surguja (C.G.) 'iiyi -iSiS^iB' lENTS State of Chhsttisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Food Public Distribution and Consumer Protection, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhav/an; 'f n \ i^.'J.) /~l/*u. ^UIi^^i-yi , l^r;rftr Surguja, District Surguja (C.G.) Sub-Divjslonal Officer, Ambikapui District - Surguja (C.G.) Vll ^i.nr^ tl: iiKion tsr'lsa Mfi'997 n1 B-,5S^^% &s£.'^!&&S ^i?s !ItUl Present : Shri Neeraj Mehta, counsel for the Petltioner. Shri Kishore Bhaduri, ieamed Additional Advocate General for the State / responcients. The followi (1 4'" March, the Court vvas passed hv Srf' ^v CSiint^. C. :ff 'itBS'Su^^S.Sfi,^ '•iat's-'ST ^ Learned counsel for the parties are heard. 2'; Shri Kishore Bhaduri, learned Additional Advocate Generai submits that, the issues raised in this writ petition have atready been finaliy decided vide order dated 09.03.2007 passed in WP No,5265/200E and other connected petitions; and as such, now, nothing survives for decision in this writ petition. 3'! Shri Neerai Me'nta, tearned counsel for t'ne petitioner could not dispute ths above factua' situation now prevaiiing in the case. 4) The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. 5) Consecsuentlv, the interim order dated 05.07.2006 stands vacated automaticaliy. Sd./- ChiefJustice So7- Sunii Kumar Sinha Judge oadms