IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17246 of 2011 BAKTA DEVI @ BABITA DEVI & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 27.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. Although petitioners are named in the first information report but according to first information report of the informant, she was kidnapped by FIR named accused, Mrigendra Sharma and this petitioner but subsequently, when her statement under section-164 of the Cr.P.C. was recorded, she stated that she was kidnapped by petitioners and one another woman. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that as a matter of fact, there was love affairs between the co- accused, Mrigendra Sharma and informant but subsequently, she stated a false story on account of pressure of her parents. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioners, namely, Bakta Devi @ Babita Devi and Kabita Devi be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 291 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Sri Lalta Prasad, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Danapur, Patna. AKV/- ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)