IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR r CHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION NOJ5350F 2004 PETITIONERS : Devendra Jaiswal, S/O. Shri G.P. Jaiswal, Aged about 28 years, Presently posted as Constable (No.159), P.S. Parpa, District Jagdalpur (C.G.)t Rafik Hasan Khan, S/O. Mohd. Ismail Khan Aged about 30 years, Presently posted as Constable (No 505) Pollce Line Kanker (C G) Ashok Kumar Pandey, S/O Shrk Prem Raj Pandey, Presently posted xx as Constable (No 852) R/O Pollce Line, Jagdalpur (C.G.). Ravendra Kumar Pandey, S/O. Shri Prem Raj Pandey, Presently posted as Constable (No.49), Police Line, Dantewada (CG). Raju Thakur, S/O. Shri Amarjeet Singh, Aged about 35 years, Presently posted as Constable (No.1303), Police Station Kistaram, Dantewada (CG). Ramkrishna Badoria, S/O, Bajrang Singh, Aged about 34 years, Presently posted as Constable (No 215) Police Station Sukuma Dantewada (C G) ~X Soblmath Jalswal, S/O. Shri Ramkishore, Aged about 41 years, Presently posted as Constable Pollce Station Sukuma Dantewada (C G) Ramnaresh Mishr'‘a; “S/O‘ Shri Laxminath Mishra, Aged about 39 years, Presently ‘ posted as Constable (No.673), Police’ Station Dhanora, District Jagdalpur, (C.G.)r ’ Versus RESPONDENTS : 1A Union of India Through the Secretary, Department of Personnel, Public Grievance and Pension,‘ Third Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi. 2. State of Madhya Pradesh Through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (MP). 3. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, D.K,S.t Building, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. - Director General of Police, State of Chhattisgarh, g Raipur (C..G.). 5. Inspector General of Police g (Personnel), Police Head Quarters, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 6. Superintendent of Police, District South Bastar (Dantewada) (C.G.). .. ‘6 rs/ . WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/2 7 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS. As shown in the cause title L m ‘ K ..... wwm ~ ‘ W W WWI") P 1$&§...W zooL mag 09.06.2004: - Sh Prashant hr la ed Counsel for the petitioner Sh ay Ha S tag counsel for Un of In V Sh od Shastav rned fr the State/respondent N 3,4, 5 and 6 on vance cop None f resondent Sere on responden 3 reqed as no re cled Sere to pensed L.No. A 3634 and LA. No. 64 35/200 are alloe. wd Heard Counsel for the pe r sus that te matter relates to allocan of the pener further subs that the lar matter- 578/2004(Balera S har hra an Others Un of In an ers), orders hav een assed by t Cou on 17..2003. H submittd tht simila order my e passed in this ease also. ving considered the fs and circumstances of the cse, material on ecord nd in view f the juement cited above and urer the legal position, the action o the State Authorities in t relieving he petitioners cannot be sustain d and the petitioners are entitled for relieving. Accordingly, the petition allowed The respondents are directed to relieve the petitioners Within 1 days from way MI W<§WW 9&9‘w With this observation the petition disposed of Consequently, M.W2P.No 1373/2004 stands disposed of. ' ’ ' r Certified copy as per rule . K’ ’ sdl- /_// at *7 Fakhruddin Judge a [mam I mu n Mlsa ; m s n Vm nt r Snqm mo dia n Vm nva a G A o o ad y or p N 2 vrc t No Is not uir lief rs aimf m It vsc it Is dis With tltlo es bmlt h tlo tltros mit srml W P No nd h k Mus d V mo dia d Oth e b p hus rt 12 e e a r a b Ha act a r a o dg fth no t