" I VII‘1lI w J41g‘; 3 ‘Wmmw Ci? %« BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH WP. No. 4’43 2 OF 2004 Smt Anita Thawait W/o Shri Premprakash Thawait aged about 35 years occupauon house w1fe r/o ward No 6 Nagar Panchayat Sarangarh D1stt Raugarh (C.G‘) PETITIONER : VERSUS RESPONDENgV\ $81 Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, State Election s Commission, State Election Commission Chhattisgarh, Raipur 2. State Election Commissioner, State Election Commission Chhattisgarh Rmmn 3. Collector Cum Distnct Returmng Officer $ Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 1 ' RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22§l227 OF COESTITUTION OF INDIA l W XI—HC—ZZ mam mm mm mmwvm Z51TL2004 Shri S. N.Nande, counsel for th€ petitioner. Shri P.K. Verma, Additional Advocate r6spondents/ State. ’ , The petitioner has prefen‘ed this Wn't Petition ‘ being aggrievedby the onier dated 18/21 October 2004 (Annexure P— 1) passed by the Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Election Commission, Raipur whereby the petitioner; has been disquaiifled £rom contesting from the election Gencral for for the‘post of President, Nagax Panchayat for a period of 5 years under Section 32 (c) of Chhattisgarh Nagar Panchayat The brief facts leading to tiling of this Writ Petition are that the petitioner contested in Adhiniyam 6 1. the year 1999 elections of Nagar Panchayat, Sarangarh District Raigarh. The petitioner contested for the post of the President 3f Nagar Panchayat, Sarangarh and she lost this election result was declared on 27. 12. 1999. As per the clause-7 of Election (maintenance and lodging of account order 1997), the petitioner was requi ed to submit the account of election expenses to District Election Officer within a period of 3O days from the date of the result. As the petitioner failed to submit the election expenses in comnliar. cause notice was issued to th¢ State Election. Commission c within 15 daVs as to why the failing which the order will ce of the above provision, a show i petitioner by the Madhya Pradesh n 20.07.2000 for showing cause accotuits were not furnished and be passed againstathe petitioner. {lea v'r vu itwu wk” “$251” My n f Election Commission showing filing tho accounts before th( stipulated time. As such the out the case for relief under Chhattisgarh Municipal Act petitioner is liable to be rejectc good mason and justification for not :r-District Election OEcer Within the petitioner has not. been able to make sub Section of Section 32 ( c )e of {961, Therefore the petition of the / d and it is rejected. [View (5?, {1-HC-22 ’ . wi’.txwb} W 0 200 mm W rmw WW mmmw <3 _ WW ®€tm éa'mm mm Ekction Oiiicer and even them is no application was filed by the petitioner bsfors the District Election Officcr or before th€ Stat€