IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5827 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.10.2009 Om Parkash Kashyap .....Petitioner versus Yashpal .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Arvind Kashyap, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Ramesh Goyal, Advocate, for the respondent. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) In this revision petition, the petitioner-tenant has been ordered to be evicted from the demised premises comprising a residential house No.449/2, Sector 45-A, Chandgiarh, by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, vide order dated 27.7.2009 on the ground of personal necessity being a Specified Landlord, while declining the petitioner's application for leave to defend. Counsel for the petitioner, having regard to the hardship of the respondent-landlord, made a fair statement at the bar that he does not want to press this revision petition on merits if some reasonable time is granted to the petitioner-tenant to vacate the premises. Counsel for the respondent-landlord, on instructions, has come with a fair stand that six months maximum time may be granted to C.R. No.5827 of 2009 (O&M) 2 the petitioner-tenant to vacate the premise in dispute. In view of the mutual stand taken by counsel for both the parties, this revision petition is disposed of as not pressed for on merits, in the following terms:- (i) the petitioner-tenant shall pay entire arrears of rent, if any, on or before 15.11.2009 by way of demand draft in the name of the respondent-landlord; (ii) the petitioner-tenant shall continue to pay monthly rent by way of demand draft in the name of respondent-landlord on or before 10th of every calendar month; (iii) the petitioner-tenant shall file an affidavit with an undertaking on or before 15.11.2009 before the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, to the effect that he will vacate the demised premises and hand-over the peaceful vacant possession thereof to the respondent-landlord on or before 30.4.2010; (iv) subject to compliance of term Nos.(i) to (iii) above, the petitioner-tenant shall be entitled to retain the possession of the demised premises till 30.4.2010; (v) in the event of any default of any of the above terms No.(i) to (iii), on behalf of the petitioner, this revision petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed; (vi) it is made clear that if the petitioner-tenant fails to honour his undertaking, the respondent-landlord shall be entitled to get the demised premise vacated with the police help without prejudice to his legal rights to initiate contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act also. Dasti. 21-10-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE