IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5426 of 2011 ASHISH KUMAR @ CHINTU Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 23.02.2011 Petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in a case registered under Sections 364 of the I.P.C. Petitioner’s complicity sprang up on the basis of circumstantial evidence of last seen with the victim. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that family members of the victim have been examined during trial who have not deposed against the petitioner. Since the victim is still traceless, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at present. However, if the trial is not concluded within nine months, then petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail in connection with Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 288 of 2009, Sessions Trial No. 119 of 2010/ 142 of 2010. The application stands disposed off. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)