IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 25TH MARCH 2010 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 10149 of 2010(P) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ M.P. JOY, MANGALATH PUTHANPURAYIL HOUSE, ATHIYODE.P.O, KOORACHUNDRU, KOZHIKODE. BY ADV. MR.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM. 2. SRI.K. BHASKARAN, KILIVAYIL HOUSE, IRINGALOOR.P.O, VENGARA, MALAPPURAM. R1 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) NO: 10149 OF 2010 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th March, 2010. JUDGMENT The petitioner is the registered owner of a stage carriage vehicle bearing No: KL-18 C 909 conducting services on the route Kozhikode-Ernakulam South as a limited stop ordinary service. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the request for revision of timings submitted by the second respondent. According to the petitioner there are no circumstances warranting revision of timings of the second respondent. Therefore, he has objected to the revision that is sought for by submitting Exts.P4 and P5 objections. As per judgment in W.P(C) 1086/2010, this Court has directed the objections of the petitioner in the said writ petition also to be considered while deciding whether to revise the timings of the second respondent or not. The petitioner prays for a direction to consider his objections also while finalising the timings of the second respondent . The Learned Senior Government Pleader has no objection to such a direction being issued. 2. In the above circumstances this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider Exts.P4 and P5 objections submitted by the petitioner also while deciding the question as to WPC 10149/2010 2 whether the second respondent's timings are to be revised. The above shall be done in a timing conference convened after issuing notice to the petitioner as well as to all other interested persons in this regard. Orders shall be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of two months from the receipt of a copy of this judgment. K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj WPC 10149/2010 3 K.K.DENESAN & V. RAMKUMAR, JJ. ---------------------------------------------------- M.F.A.NO: ----------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT Dated: