V/ IN tIE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAUALORE Di’.TED t flflS TilE STE DAY OF fINE 1998 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JuSTICE CHANDRLlrARAIAH flflTITIfl / BENEKI: Sri H,tbirendra Prabhu, 3/0 H.Govindaraya Prabhu aged about 58 years, R/o No.106/i, 4th Cross, Tilaknagar, iioga. ... Petitioner. (By Sri Pj..Kuikarni for Petr.) AND: 1. Karnatalca Housing Board, Cauvery Bbavan, Bangalore - 9, by its Commissioner. 2. Executive Engineer, Karnata1 Housing Board Divn., inoga - 577 201. 3. The SpecIal Land Acquisition Officer, Karnatalca Housing Board, Cauvery Ehavan, V Banaalore — 9. ,., tprond&jts, (By 3r1 R.S.Hgde for R-1 to p-3.) . . . 2/— e rS a an.. -2- This jt Petition fi1. Ufld Articles 226 & 227 of the ConstItution of IndIa th an affi davit praying to: Quash Annex—H dt.20.2.97 by R-i and etc. This Irit Petition coming on fbr prelininary heing in ‘B’ group this day, the Court made the fo1lo4ng: The petitioner in this petition has challenged the notice issued by the Rousing Board d.anding Bs.59,,833/- as betterment charges, Th learned counse]. for th Housing Board submitted that during the pcndency of the ‘it petition on the represen tation made by the petitioner, the Housing Board has redetermned the betterment charges and fixed at Rs.5,97,540/— by order of the Conissionier F ted 23-1-1298. In Vi€W àf the subsequent development this ‘j petition does not survive r consideration, Ardingly, this petition is rejected. However, it is open for the petitioner to chailenge the order passed by the Housing Board during the pendency of the writ petition determining the better2ent charges, if he Is so advised. 3d!- Judge. Atstant Regkar bsr(o.s.) UighConItofKtTtt b auga1ore- 56 O c.by: