IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.10687 -M of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : APRIL 19, 2010 BHAGWAN DASS & ORS. ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Mr. Neeraj Gaur, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) This petition under Section 439, Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed for bail in case FIR No.59 dated 26.2.2009 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Nuh, District Mewat. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners have been in custody since 13.1.2010. Investigation qua the petitioners has already been concluded. Conclusion of trial is likely to take time. The facts, as stated on behalf of the petitioners, are not disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions Criminal Misc. No.10687 -M of 2010 2 from HC Ravinder Kumar. Considering the custody period, the nature of offences and also the fact that conclusion of trial is likely to take time, the petition is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Nuh. April 19, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?