CRM No. M-31687 of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-31687 of 2008 Date of decision: 21.01.2009 Yashpal ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. N.K. Sanghi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Senior DAG, Haryana. Rajan Gupta, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegation against the petitioner is that he recommended the disbursement of the loan being Land Valuation Officer. However, the loan was not used for the purpose, it was disbursed. He further submits that the entire amount, which was subject matter of the loan, has been repaid by the loanee. He also submits that pursuant to the order dated 3rd December, 2008, the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further interrogation. Learned counsel for the State (on the instructions from S.I. Partap Singh, who is present in Court) does not dispute this factual position. Keeping in view the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the petitioner deserves the concession of anticipatory bail. Consequently, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 3rd December, 2008 is hereby made absolute. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE January 21, 2009 'rajpal'