IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL SECOND APPEAL SECOND APPEAL NO.947 OF 2002 NO.947 OF 2002 NO.947 OF 2002 Ramakant Popatlal Shah & Anr. ..Appellant versus Nitinkumar Bhagwandas Patel ..Respondent. Mr.P.N.Joshi for the Appellant Ms. Sharvari Kanitkar for Mr.P.S.Dani for the Respondent Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Coram : S.R.Sathe, J. Dated : 5th April, 2006 Dated : 5th April, 2006 Dated : 5th April, 2006 P.C. 1. Heard both the learned Advocates. Shri P.N.Joshi learned Advocate for the Appellant submits that Appellant is only in possession of one room and substantial time be granted to vacate the premises. The learned Advocate for the Respondent submitted that the original suit is of the year 1983 and as such time may not be granted. 2. There is absolutely no substantial question of law involved in this matter. Hence the appeal is dismised in limini. 3. However, time of four months is granted from today to the appellant defendant to vacate the suit premises. (S.R.Sathe, J.)