IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT SATURDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2007 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 Crl.MC.No. 3081 of 2007() ------------------------- CC.532/2006 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-II (FOREST OFFENCES), MANJERI .................... PETITIONER: ACCUSED: -------------------- 1. ABDUL KAREEM, PERAKAN KANDI HOUSE, ELAMARAM, EDAVANNAPPARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. MUHAMMED, PERAKAN KANDI HOUSE, ELAMARAM, EDAVANNAPPARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. MUHAMMED KOYA, PERAKAN KANDI HOUSE, ELAMARAM, EDAVANNAPPARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 4. NAFEESA, PERAKAN KANDI HOUSE, ELAMARAM, EDAVANNAPPARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 5. NAFEESA, PERAKAN KANDI HOUSE, ELAMARAM, EDAVANNAPPARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 6. AMBALI SALAM, S/O. MOOSA, ELAMARAM, EDAVANNAPPARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 7. ABDUL MUNEER, ELAMARAM, EDAVANNAPPARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 8. SALMAN K.T., ELAMARAM, EDAVANNAPPARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 9. YASIR, PERAKAN KANDI HOUSE, ELAMARAM, EDAVANNAPPARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANJAY SRI.M.MUHAMMED SHAFI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. SUHARA, D/O. SEETHI, MOOSHARIKKANDI HOUSE, PUTHUR AMSOM, OMASSERY DESOM, KOZHIKODE. R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. M.S. BREEZ THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R. BASANT, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C.No. 3081 of 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of December, 2007 O R D E R The prayer in this Crl.M.C. is to quash a prosecution under Section 498A I.P.C. on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes. No material whatsoever has been produced before this Court to satisfy the court that the matter has been settled between the parties. The defacto complainant/second respondent has not entered appearance. Though sufficient time has been granted, appearance of the second respondent has not been ensured and no joint application is filed to confirm that there has been a composition. 2. This Crl.M.C. is, in these circumstances, dismissed. (R. BASANT) Judge tm