IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.23914 of 2011 Surendra Prasad Yadav son of late Yadunandan Bhagat Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2/ 25.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by order dated 15.03.2011 vide Cr. Misc. No.43229 of 2010, but he was granted liberty to renew his prayer after framing of charge. It has been submitted that charges have been framed jointly against the petitioner and one Purohit Yadav by order dated 20.12.2010 and, therefore, he deserves bail. Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the FTC 5th, Patna, in connection with Sessions Trial No.1809 of 2010, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to 2 initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)