2- S-3169-93. DOC Shephali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 3169 OF 1993 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 87 OF 1997 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 671 OF 1997 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 886 OF 1999 IN SUIT NO. 3169 OF 1993 Bank of Baroda. …Plaintiff Versus Manubhai J. Patel. …Defendant Mr. Manish Shukla i/b Little & Co. for the Plaintiffs. CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2014 PC:- 1. Learned Advocate for the plaintiff states that M/s. Little & Co. have already taken a discharge in 2001. 1 of 2 2- S-3169-93. DOC 2. The suit is listed for directions today. The name of the parties is correctly shown. No new appearance has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. The name of the plaintiff is called out. 3. A notice has been issued on the printed board, as also on the High Court Website, to the effect that from 10th February 2014, when a suit listed under the caption for directions is called out, if none appears for the plaintiff/s, the suit will be dismissed. 4. The names of the plaintiff and its Advocates are correctly shown. None appears when the matter is called out. The suit is dismissed under Order IX Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. 5. Interim / ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier in any interlocutory proceedings in this suit, shall stand vacated forthwith. 6. In view of the above, all pending applications are disposed of. (G. S. PATEL, J.) 2 of 2