IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6215 of 2009 Date of decision: 20.4.2010 Bal Krishan Sharma ...Petitioner Versus Gurpal Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. G.S.Sandhawalia, Advocate for the respondent. S.D.ANAND, J. The plea raised by the plaintiff-petitioners to adduce additional evidence came to be declined by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 2.9.2009. In obtaining that view, the learned Trial Court was influenced by the fact that the affirmative evidence of both the parties already stood concluded and matter was already fixed for rebuttal evidence and arguments on merits thereof. It also noticed that the plaintiff-petitioner had not been able to adduce the relevant evidence in affirmative inspite of grant of opportunity in the relevant behalf. It further noticed that the factum of additional evidence proposed to be adduced had already been admitted on facts in the course of the written statement filed at the trial. For the very reasons noticed by the learned Trial Court, I find no illegality, perversity or invalidity in the impugned order. The petition shall stand dismissed accordingly. April 20, 2010 (S.D.Anand) Pka Judge