IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 23691 of 2007 Between: 1 N. Rohit, S/o. N. Rajeshwar, r/o. 23-81/C, Gaddi Annaram, Saroornagar (M), Ranga Reddy District. 2 Shakti Mayur Sai Singh, S/o. Shakthi Prabash, R/o. H.No. 18-15-56, Sadguru Nagar Colony, Karmanghat (V), Saroornagar (M), Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Director of Tribal Welfare, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Telugu Sankshema Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 2 The Convenor, EAMCET-2007, Sankethika Vidya Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 3 Arjun College of Engineering & Technology, Batasingaram, Hayathnagar (M), Ranga Reddy District. 4 Tirumala Engineering College, Kesaragutta, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to pass an order or give a direction or issue a writ more particularly a Writ more particularly a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in issuance of impugned memos with certain irrelevant objections i.e., Memo No. R.C.No. 2100/2007/TRI/VC-2 dated 12-8-2007, to the first petitioner and memo No. Rc.No.2100/2007/TRI/VC-2 dated 14-8-2007, the 2nd petitioner instead of treating them as STs Nakkala /Pittalollu. Under S.No. 34 as per the memo No. 3743/GCC.I/2003-10 dt. 20-9-2005 of the social welfare (GCC.I) Department of Govt. of A.P. & Memo No. 5450/CV-2/2005 dt. 23-10-2006, and allowing their admission into I year B.E/B.Tech course under S.T. quota Consequently set-aside the impugned memos and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SHAIK ANWAR PASHA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following : ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is as sought for is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. __________ 13-08-2008 rkk