HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Bail Application No. 1212 of 2006 CRIMINAL SIDE Sharvan s/o Sri Yashpal, P.W.D. Colony Devpura P.S. Kotwali, Haridwar, District Haridwar. ……Accused / Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal …..Opposite Party _______________________________________________ Case Crime No. 303 of 2006 Under Section 498- A I.P.C. and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S.Ranipur, District Haridwar. _______________________________________________ Dated 20.12.2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Sri Pawan Kumar, Advocate for the applicant and the A.G.A. for the prosecution. The applicant has applied for bail in case crime No. 303 of 2006, for the offences punishable under sections 498-A I.P.C. and Section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Ranipur, District Haridwar. Counsel for the applicant has submitted that the case was registered against the applicant on the basis of the application under section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. Prior to that compromise has taken place between the parties but the complainant’s wife did not comply the terms of the compromise and in order to harass the applicant false complaint has been filed. Without expressing anything on the merit of the case, I am of the opinion that it is aft case for bail. Let the accused applicants be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned. Rajesh Tandon, J. Dated: 20.12.2006 *Dhyani