IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15533 of 2004 MADHUSUDAN PRASAD Versus THE V.C., MAGADH UNIVERSITY & ORS. ----------- 14/ 21.05.2010 Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan for the petitioner and Mr. Yugal Kishore, learned counsel for the University are present. The petitioner superannuated from the post of Professor from A.N. College, Patna with effect from 31.1.2004. The writ petition was filed for payment of the post retiral dues which has not been paid to the petitioner. A series of counter affidavit and supplementary counter affidavit was filed during the course of proceedings. Although learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he had filed the rejoinder to the counter affidavit but office has given report that no such rejoinder was filed. Learned counsel for the University also submits that he has not received any copy thereof. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that there are yet three pending grievance of the petitioner. He petitioner submits that despite the aforesaid position a part of the differential U.G.C. arrears of salary amount by reason of implementation of U.G.C. pay-scale with effect from 1.1.996 to 31.1.2004 and also the interest on deferred D.A. and group insurance amount in the light of the judicial 2 pronouncement reported in 2006(4) P.L.J.R. 369, has not been paid. He further submits that the unutilized leave salary has not been correctly calculated. Having regard to the circumstances that most of the retiral benefits have been disbursed by the University except those as set out hereinabove, I am of the opinion that the writ petition be disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to raise his grievance regarding the U.G.C. arrears as also regarding his claim of unutilized leave salary together with supportive details and which shall be considered and disposed of by the respondent no. 2, the Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya in accordance with law, expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. Learned counsel for the University submits that the issue of payment of interest on deferred D.A. and group insurance amount is now pending consideration before the Supreme Court. The aforesaid claim of the petitioner shall be governed by the final outcome of the proceedings before the Supreme Court. With the aforesaid observations/directions the writ petition stands disposed of. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)