bgp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1998 OF 2009 The Director of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. The Stock Exchange Customers’ Protection Fund ..Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 14TH OCTOBER, 2009 P.C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Perused appeal. 2. The question sought to be raised has already been dealt with by the Tribunal in the assessee’s case for the A.Ys.1992-93 to 1997-98. All the adverse orders are accepted by the Revenue and the very same orders are followed without giving any reason. The Revenue has also not given any explanation as to why they are preferring this appeal, when they have accepted the earlier orders. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed in limine for want of substantial question of law with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)