1 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION No. 214 OF 2006 Mahadeo Chango Hatwar & ors. v. Dr. Sanjay Mukherjee, Distt. Collector, Nagpur _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders Mr. A.D. Dangore Advocate for the Petnrs. Mr.Jaiswal, A.G.P., for the Respondent. .... CORAM: A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 17th JULY, 2007. Heard Mr.Dangore, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Jaiswal, learned A.G.P., for respondent and Mr.Manohar, learned counsel for the applicant on C.A. No. 6943/06. 2. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the orders passed by this Court from time to time appointing an independent Commissioner for examining whether the orders of the Collector were implemented or not, so also having seen 2 the report of the Project Officer, Water Conservation Department, who has furnished detailed report, which report has been prepared after the parties to the litigation were present on the spot, I find that the hearing of this contempt petition cannot be stretched indefinitely or independent Commissioner cannot be appointed as desired by the petitioners repeatedly. Petitioners are at liberty to take such steps as are permissible in law. Remedy of filing contempt petition in this Court, under the circumstances, cannot be allowed to be continued. There is no substance in the contempt petition. Contempt petition dismissed. JUDGE /TA/