IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10119 of 2008 WASI AHMAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 5.9.2008 Heard Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Senior Advocate, for the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. Through this application the petitioner seek the quashing of the entire prosecution case against him including order dated 1.2.2006 passed in Adapur P.S. Case No. 135 of 2005 by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul, whereby the cognizance has been taken under sections 302, 307, 326 and other allied sections of the Penal Code as also section 27 of the Arms Act against the petitioner and others. The apprehension of the petitioner is that he is likely to be arrested on the basis of the statement of one Bhola Hussain in paragraph 53 of the case diary where it has been stated as Shaukat Ali @ Wasi Ahmad. I have perused the impugned order dated 1.2.2006 and amongst the thirteen persons named in the chargesheet the name of neither Shaukat Ali or Wasi Ahmad figures as one of the accused. Even in the F.I.R. name of Wasi Ahmad does not figure as one of the accused. In the aforesaid circumstances this application by Wasi Ahmad simplicitor is misconceived and dismissed. Spd/ (Abhijit Sinha, J.)