IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 21ST KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 33257 of 2008(H) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. C.V.VENU, CHENTHARA, OLANAD, VARAPUZHA.P.O. 2. N.RAJIV, RAREERAM, KESAVANPADI, THIRUVANKULAM.P.O. 3. C.K.JONES, CHALAPPURATH HOUSE, KAVALESWARAM ROAD, THIRUVANKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. T.G.NARENDRAN, PRESIDENT, BPCL EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO.E.226,AMBALAMUGAL, COCHI. 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL)OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL)KUNNATHUNAD, PERUMBAVOOR. 3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (VIGILANCE), ERNAKULAM. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C.SANTHOSH KURUP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) NO.33257 OF 2008 (H) ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 12th day of November, 2008 J U D G M E N T In the nature of the orders issued hereunder, notice to first respondent is dispensed with, preserving his right to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved. The petitioners grievance is that the third respondent has not adverted to and considered the contents of Exhibit P1 and decided on any action to be taken thereon. Having obtained the report it is not proper to drag on the matter indefinitely. Therefore, without expressing anything on merits and after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader on behalf of second and third respondents, this writ petition is ordered directing that the third respondent will take Exhibits P1 and P2 and communicate his decision thereon to the first petitioner, within a period of two months from now. In doing so, and if any action is proposed, that shall be done only in terms of law, after affording sufficient opportunity of hearing to persons who would be entitled to be heard and also the first petitioner. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE skr/14/11