IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 5213 of 2010 Date of Decision: August 19, 2010 Madhukar Mittal …Petitioner Versus Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board. …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH. 1. Whether reporters of local news papers may be Allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 14.01.2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Karnal, as well as order dated 03.08.2010 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Karnal, whereby both the Courts below rejected the application moved by the plaintiff-petitioner under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C. C.R. No. 5213 of 2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner – plaintiff argues that deduction of cess from the payment of the plaintiff - contractor is illegal, hence, deduction should be stayed. From the contents of the plaint, it seems that plaintiff wants injunction restraining the defendant not to deduct the cess amount from the payment. In view of this, any payment deducted shall be subject to the final decision of the suit and against the deduction, no interim injunction should be granted because there would be no irreparable loss or injury to the plaintiff. Petition is dismissed. However, it is made clear any deduction made from the payment of the plaintiff shall be subject to the final decision of the suit. August 19, 2010 ( Alok Singh ) vkd Judge 2