IN THE HI6H COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P. No. 113 of 2000 CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI S.R.NAyAK. CHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE SHRI DILIP RAOSAHEB bESHMUKH. J. PETITIONER RESPON&ENTS t)r. Inamur Rehmoui S/o Shri Ataur Rehman, aged about 40 years, R/o Killapara, Pandari, District-Kawardha V E RSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: The Principal Secretary. Department of Publjc HeatTh Services, ;ur. 2. The birector, 1-ieaith Ser-vices, Raipur. 3. The Chief Medical <& Health Officer, Bilaspur. Present:- Shri Indrasen Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Yeshwctnt Singh Thakur, 6ovt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passeci on 12th Aprii, 2006) The following order of the court was passed by S.R.Nayak. C.J. The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Sur9eon on adhoc basis vide order dated 07-12-1990 with specific understanding that his appointment wns only for a period of 6 months. The petitioner was however continued beyond 6 months for a further period of 3 months in order to facilitate him to undergo a training course. Thereafterwards. his services were terminated. In the circumstance, 1-he petitioner moved an apptication O.A.No.2681/1991 before the M.P, Stoite Administrotive Tribunal, Jabalpur (for short "the Tribunat") claiming thot since the department continued his services for a further period of 3 mon1+is after the agreed period of 6 months, his services should not Have been terminaited after completion of 9 months and his services should have been continued forever. This claim put forth bylthe "^L' /•\ petitioner before the Tribunal was not acceptable in terms of law. In these circumstances, O.A. Number 2681/1991 was dismissed by the Tribunal vide its order dated 10-12-1999. Hence, this Writ Petition under Artide-226 of the Constitution of India. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. The order of the Tribunal is unexceptionable. We do not find any semblonce of legal right in the petitioner to claim that by virtue of the adhoc appointment order.dated 07-12-1990, he should have been continued 'm service beyond 9 months simply, because, after the expiry of 6 months envisaged in the order dated 07-12-1990, hjs services were continued for a further period of 3 months in order to facilitate him to undergo a training course. If there is a vaconcy in the post of Assistant Surgeon that vacancy has to be fitled in accordcnce with recruitment rules governing recruitment and appointment to the post of Assistant Surgeon. The backdoor entry made by the petitioner by way of fft/Aoc appointment for aperiod of 6 months in exigency of service would not vest omy enforceable right in the petitioner to stick on to the post. The Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. No cost& Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge