IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6157 of 2011 NAG NARAYAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 07.03.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in petition. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 379, 467, 468, 474, 420, 504/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 3 of the S.C./S.T.(Prevention of Atrocities)Act. The informant being the Bank employee has levelled allegation against co- employee that they not only obstructed him in working but accused used to abuse the informant also. The statement has been made in paragraph no. 5 of the petition that prior to the present case, in the year 2003 the petitioners’ side lodged two cases against the informant. It is further submitted that there was stay with regard to arrest of petitioner but subsequently the charge sheet was 2 submitted and similarly situated persons have been granted anticipatory bail in 2009 by this Court. Considering the background in which the present case has been lodged and accusation does not inspire confidence, let petitioner above named be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Keshariay P.S. Case No. 112 of 2004 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Motihari, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)