AJN 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1055 OF 2005 Union of India & Ors. ... Petitioners Vs. Gunwant Dalpat Purabia. ... Respondent Mr. R.R. Shetty with Mr. N.D. Sharma i/b Dr. T.C. Kaushik for the petitioners. Mr. Ramesh Ramamurthy for the respondent. ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1059 OF 2005 Union of India & Ors. ... Petitioners Vs. Manoj Vasant Jadhav. ... Respondent Mr. R.R. Shetty with Mr. N.D. Sharma i/b Dr. T.C. Kaushik for the petitioners. Mr. Ramesh Ramamurthy for the respondent. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J. DATED : JULY 17, 2007. P.C.:- AJN 2 1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents states that the impugned judgment of the Tribunal only directs the petitioners before this court to consider the case of the respondents in these petitions, as per their policy and in accordance with law. Of course, there is an indication that the previous services should be counted for relaxation of age. 2. In view of the above statement, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that the Appropriate Authority will consider the respondents' case as per their policy and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders thereto. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in these petitions. The petitions are disposed of. The petitioners will abide by their statement. They shall consider the respondent's case and pass appropriate order as expeditiously as possible and, at any rate, not later than six months from today. [CHIEF JUSTICE] [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.]