Crl. Misc. No.M-26855 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-26855 of 2010 Date of Decision: November 26, 2010 Sikander Singh …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. P.S. Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, DAG, Punjab. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) It appears that the petitioner is involved in the case on the basis of circumstantial evidence which is in the nature of extra judicial confession and evidence of last seen. In view of the nature of the allegations and the quality of evidence which appears to be weak type, at this stage, it will not be Crl. Misc. No.M-26855 of 2010 [2] appropriate to grant the concession of bail to the petitioner as the evidence which is already weak may be tampered with by the petitioner, in case released on bail. Dismissed at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh after some evidence is produced by the prosecution agency. November 26, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE