IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9945 of 2010 1. GANESH KUMAR 2. KARTIK KUMAR BOTH SONS OF BHOLA MEHTA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LACHHMINIYA, P.S. SUPAUL, DISTT. SUPAUL. 3. BHOLA MEHTA, SON OF LATE PHANILAL MEHTA 4. SMT. PARVATI DEVI, WIFE OF SRI BHOLA MEHTA 5. JAGDISHWAR MEHTA, SON OF CHHATARDHARI MEHTA SL. NO. 3 TO 5 ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE MANGANJ, P.S. GUDIYA, DISTT. SUPAUL. 6. RAJENDRA MEHTA, SON OF LATE DEEP NARAYAN MEHTA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LACHHMINIYA, P.S. AND DISTRICT SUPAUL. PETITIONERS NO. 1 TO 4 PERMANENT RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE LACHHMINIYA, P.S. AND DISTRICT SUPAUL ----- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE OF SUPAUL POLICE STATION. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, SUPAUL, DISTT. SUPAUL. 4. THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, SUPAUL, DISTT. SUPAUL. 5. SRI SUBODH KUMAR, SON OF LATE NAND KISHORE MEHTA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LACHHMINIYA, P.S. AND DISTRICT SUPAUL. ------- OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 2. 03.12.2010 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 14.12.2009 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Supaul, in Misc. Case No. 387 of 2009 by which the court has issued notices as to why they should not be bound for a period of one year. Considering that the petitioner is not present here and I see no justification for quashing the impugned order, the application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)