IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.44700 of 2010 BHAGLU YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR 02/ 28.1.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case no. 124/2010 registered under sections 25(I-b)a,26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Admittedly, informant, having got confidential information that three persons were making deal of illegal cartridges at the tea stall of the petitioner, went there and arrested the petitioner from whose possession it is stated that 353 cartridges were recovered. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent and, as a matter of fact petitioner runs a tea stall where two persons came there for taking tea and in the meantime, police party reached there. Seeing the police party the aforesaid persons fled away from there leaving behind a bag which was subsequently seized by the police and thereafter arrested the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid submissions as well as period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody particularly, Keeping in mind that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent, petitioner Bhaglu Yadav is directed to be released on bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case no. 124 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the - 2 - satisfaction of Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Munger. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)