-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Notice of Motion No.984 of 2003 In Income Tax Appeal (L) No.255 of 2003 CIT Bombay .. .. Applicant v/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. .. .. Respondent Mr.A.M.Kotangale for applicant. Ms.Aarti Vissanji with Mr.S.J.Mehta for res. ---- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & V.R. KINGAONKAR, JJ. V.R. KINGAONKAR, JJ. V.R. KINGAONKAR, JJ. DATED : 1st August 2006 DATED : 1st August 2006 DATED : 1st August 2006 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Kotangale in support of this Motion. Ms.Vissanji appears for the respondent. 2. The Motion seeks condition of delay of 223 days in filing the Appeal. The ground given is that the department is undergoing major restructuring and the assesses are being identified as per the Municipal limits and thus the case records are accordingly being transferred from one charge to other and reassigned. We accept this explanation so as not to cause any prejudice. Motion is granted in terms of prayer (a). Delay condoned. Motion disposed of. Appeal be numbered. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) -2- (V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.) (V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.) (V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.)