1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 89 OF 2007 Bhimabai Yashod Patil ... Appellant. Versus Dilip Yashod Patil ... Respondent. -------- Shri. M.C. Jain, Advocate for the apellant. Shri M.H. Patil for respondent. -------- CORAM: R.M. BORDE,J. DATE: 12th OCTOBER 2009 PER COURT : 1) Heard. Learned counsel for respective parties 2) Original Defendant / Appellant is raising exception to the concurrent impugned judgments passed by the Courts below. 3) The plaintiff instituted suit claiming declaration that he is adopted son of one Yashod Patil and that adoption is valid. The suit 2 presented by the plaintiff came to be decreed. Whereas, the appeal presented by the defendant raising exception to the judgment and decree passed by the trial court came to be dismissed. In order to contravert the contention raised by the plaintiff / defendant, he has not at all entered into the witness box. Plaintiff has placed reliance on documentary evidence, and examined himself and the witnesses in support of his case. Both the Courts below properly appreciated the evidence adduced by the plaintiffs. No substantial question of law arises for consideration of appeal. 4) Second Appeal stands dismissed. Pending Civil Applications do not survive and stand disposed of. (R.M. BORDE, J.) sdm/ 89.07 3 4