..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.427 OF 2008 Mr.Mithalal Shermal Munot. ..Applicant. Versus Mr.Dinesh Tarachand Mehta and Anr. ..Respondents. .... Mr.K.S.Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP, for the State. .... ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.364 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.427 OF 2008 Mr.Mithalal Shermal Munot and anr. ..Applicants. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. ... Mr.R.B.Howal, Adv. for the applicants. Mr.S.S.Pednekar, APP, for the State. ... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 11th September, 2008. DATED : 11th September, 2008. DATED : 11th September, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and the learned Advocate for the respondent-orig.complainant. The complainant and the accused are present in person. ..(2).. 2. By judgment and order dated 29.11.2006 the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 14th Court, Girgaum, Mumbai the applicant has been convicted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal preferred against the said order came to be dismissed. Hence this Revision. 3. During pendency of this Revision the parties have amicably settled the dispute and they have preferred Criminal Application No.364 of 2008 for compounding the said offence. 4. Looking to the fact that the parties have amicably settled the dispute permission is granted to compound the offence and the applicant is acquitted in the said case. 5. Criminal Revision and Criminal Application are allowed in above terms. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)