1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7253 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.12368 OF 2009 Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Latur. .. Applicant Versus Mahesh Harishchandra Somani and others .. Respondents Shri G. S. Khaire, Advocate h/f Shri S. S. Dande, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri M. S. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri K. G. Patil, A. G. P. for the Respondent No. 1. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7255 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 12306 OF 2009 Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Latur. .. Applicant Versus Vasant Solapure @ Vithalrao Dhotre and another .. Respondents Shri G. S. Khaire, Advocate h/f Shri S. S. Dande, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri M. S. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri K. G. Patil, A. G. P. for the Respondent No. 1. 2 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7257 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 12361 OF 2009 Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Latur. .. Applicant Versus Babu Chandsaheb Bagwan and another .. Respondents Shri G. S. Khaire, Advocate h/f Shri S. S. Dande, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri M. S. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri K. G. Patil, A. G. P. for the Respondent No. 1. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7259 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 12376 OF 2009 Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Latur. .. Applicant Versus Maheboob Chandsaheb Bagwan and another .. Respondents Shri G. S. Khaire, Advocate h/f Shri S. S. Dande, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri M. S. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri K. G. Patil, A. G. P. for the Respondent No. 1. 3 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7261 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 12367 OF 2009 Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Latur. .. Applicant Versus Ashoksing S/o Babusing Pawar and another .. Respondents Shri G. S. Khaire, Advocate h/f Shri S. S. Dande, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri M. S. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri K. G. Patil, A. G. P. for the Respondent No. 1. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7263 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 12382 OF 2009 Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Latur. .. Applicant Versus Sow Rohini W/o Ashoksing Pawar and another .. Respondents Shri G. S. Khaire, Advocate h/f Shri S. S. Dande, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri M. S. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri K. G. Patil, A. G. P. for the Respondent No. 1. 4 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7267 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 12385 OF 2009 Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Latur. .. Applicant Versus Sk. Mohammad S/o Chandsaheb Bagwan and another .. Respondents Shri G. S. Khaire, Advocate h/f Shri S. S. Dande, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri M. S. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri K. G. Patil, A. G. P. for the Respondent No. 1. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7269 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 12373 OF 2009 Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Latur. .. Applicant Versus Harishchandra Gulab Somani and another .. Respondents Shri G. S. Khaire, Advocate h/f Shri S. S. Dande, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri M. S. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri K. G. Patil, A. G. P. for the Respondent No. 1. 5 CORAM : B. R. GAVAI, AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 21ST AUGUST, 2009. ORAL ORDER [ Per B. R. Gavai, J. ] : 1. These are the applications for condonation of delay in filing the first appeal. There is delay of 67 days. The applications are vehemently opposed by learned counsel for the Respondent No. 1. However, since the appellant is public undertaking and that the huge money belonging to public interest is involved, in that view of the matter the applications for condonation of delay are allowed. The delay is condoned. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [ B. R. GAVAI, J.] bsb/August 09