1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application No. 81 of 2010 IN Letters Patent Appeal St. No. 1230 of 2010 IN Writ Petition No.3903 of 2009 [decided] [Union of India Vs. Shri Ambika Construction Co., Nagpur] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. M.G. Bhangde, Senior Adv. With Mr. N.P. Lambat, Adv., for the appellant. Mr. R.R. Srivastava, Adv., for the respondent sole. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND P.B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : 27th January, 2010. Heard learned Senior Adv. Mr. M.G. Bhangde for the appellant and learned Adv. Mr. R.R. Srivastava for the respondent sole. Accepting the reasons contained in the application, the delay is condoned. Judge Judge |Hedau| 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Letters Patent Appeal St. No. 1230 of 2010 IN Writ Petition No. 3903 of 2009 [decided] [Union of India Vs. Shri Ambika Construction Co., Nagpur] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. M.G. Bhangde, Senior Adv. With Mr. N.P. Lambat, Adv., for the appellant. Mr. R.R. Srivastava, Adv., for the respondent sole. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND P.B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : 27th January, 2010. Heard learned Senior Adv. Mr. M.G. Bhangde for the appellant and learned Adv. Mr. R.R. Srivastava for the respondent sole. Admit. Learned Adv. Mr. R.R. Srivastava waives service for the sole respondent. Judge Judge |Hedau| 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application No. 82 of 2010 IN Letters Patent Appeal St. No. 1230 of 2010 IN Writ Petition No. 3903 of 2009 [decided] [Union of India Vs. Shri Ambika Construction Co., Nagpur] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. M.G. Bhangde, Senior Adv. With Mr. N.P. Lambat, Adv., for the appellant. Mr. R.R. Srivastava, Adv., for the respondent sole. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI AND P.B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : 27th January, 2010. 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2. This is an application for stay in Letters Patent Appeal. 3. Today, this Court has admitted Letters Patent Appeal. 4. By the impugned order, learned 4 Single Judge left it to the Executing Court to calculate the amount payable under the Award being executed as a decree. 5. Part of the Award is already satisfied. 6. The case involves a question as to interpretation of decree as modified. 7. As the Letters Patent Appeal raises arguable question, it is necessary, in the interest of justice, to stay effect and operation of the Judgment of learned Single Judge appealed against. 8. In view of this, there shall be stay of order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 3903 of 2009 dated 25th November, 2009 till hearing and disposal of appeal. 9. Rule is made absolute accordingly. Judge Judge |Hedau| 5