^•S^S^SSs^hsSSy^w^^ c . f. 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. ''2C'&2-/2006 PETITIONER Premu Chandravansi S/P t-A l>ei/5/^^^ Sarpanch Gram Panchayat, ^ f Dam, TahsU & District - Dhamtari, (C.G.). ^> RESPONDENTS .-•' r\ .^^y/ ^&v / ^y/ ft. ^V^A?. ^w .•" -\»\ /^ /•.f-cyy -<^! ^'^if., <.'_/Ar s- <~'»i?' FBILASi'US r\ Vs. ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Department of Paachayat & Welfare, Mantralya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.). / 2. Uttain Kumar, S/o - Dirbi Sahu, Panch. 3. Ramadhar, S/o - Tukaraca, Panch. , 4. Shiv Kninar, S/o - Jethu Sahu, Panch. 5. Hiramaru, S/o - Parsuram Nishad. .-6. Awdesh, S/o - Domar Prasad. /7. Raniesh, S/o - Gopal Sahu. ^ 8. Ogeshwar, S/o - Rekhram Sahu. /9. Ashok, S/o - Halalu Nirinalkar. AU are residents of Darri, TahsU 85 Distn& Dhamtari, (C.G.) ^^ 2. /10. S.D.O., Dhamtari, TahsU & Distnct'^,;. Dhamtari, (C.G.) .;. 11 Col1l?£To^ ,-sh^w^rt . IA-. ~'!%^^_'?k,?^.f<^tC- h-) "'... WRIT PETITION UNDER'ARTICLJE 22'62_227 QF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT(S) OR ORDERfS) OR DIRECTIONfS) ?:~ XI-HC-78 *11*1WI Sb*1|tt> 3^ •<ii<iici<i, »Tn<ri(s, (sidwy . JA-) P ^o.2>ofc>^/^ 200 (, 3<l^»lisith (cpf3^^f) :<Erfera? [I^TstiKlti ?^<fTWHfeT3n^T 'bl^^'ifl.) i<W<'lTfffe'<?l <Kl(^K ^afi^irsn^r L.. Soma 29-6-2006 Mr. Y.C. Sharma, counsel for (he petitionsr. Mr. N.K.Agrawal, Deputy Adj/ocate Generai for the State/respondents No.1,10& 11, on advance copy. Heard. The main grievance raised b f the petitioner in this writ petition is that even though, the Additional Collecjtor, Dhamtari, has admitted the appeal filed by the petitioner against the <(rder dated 25-5-2006 of the prescribed authority, learned appellate authorit^ i.e. the Additionaf Coltector has refused to pass interim order in favour of the ^etitioner. Having heard learned counsi facts and circumstances ofthe cas^, this is not a fit case in which the order passed by the appellafe authority appeilate authority has admittedthe| appellate authority shall decide th< period ofthree months from the date| for the parties and having regard to the ^houid be steyed. However, since the appeal, therefore, it is expected that the b appeal as early as possible within a of receipt of a copy of this order. With the direction aforesaid, t(ie petition stands disposed of. In view ofthisorder,!VI.(W.)P, Parties are entitied for certifie<? copy ofthis order. io.2339/2006 also stands disposed of. Sd/- L.C.Bbadoo Judge ^ [^ 't ^