IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 907 of 2008 (M/S) Smt. Rajoo Devi. ……… Petitioner Versus Sh. Amrit Lal. ……… Respondent Mr. V.K. Kohli, Senior Advocate with Mr. T.C. Pandey, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the respondent. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties, I feel convinced that the learned Commissioner, by passing the impugned order dated 23rd May, 2008, has rightly dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioner because indeed the Tehsildar had passed the order against the respondent in his absence and it was the right of the respondent to have got the matter reopened for adjudication on merits. No interference is called for. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. (V.K. Gupta. C. J.) 15.06.2008 G