r r 35 # ' % 13.12.2010 Present: Mr. S.S. Gandhi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Rai and Mr. Prashant Mishra, Advs. for the petitioners. Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State-respondent no.l along with ASI Kalu Singh, P.S. Prashant Vihar. Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Adv. for respondent no.2 along with respondent no.2 in person. V + Crl. M.A. 18479/2010 fExemptionI Allowed, subject to all ju§t exceptions. Application stands dispose + Crl. M.C. 3863/2010 Petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 are husband and wife. On account of temperamental differences they started living separately since 2004. On the complaint of respondent no.2, FIR in question was registered against petitioner no. 1 and his relatives i.e. petitioner nds. 2 to 4. Now, petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have ironed out their differences with the intervention of common friends and family members. They have now started living together for the last more than one year. Respondent no.2, who is present in person, confirms that she is living with petitioner no. 1 in matrimonial home happily and she has no objection if the FIR is quashed. Signing Date:03.08.2024 17:21:43 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified ft 1' Siiice P^ies 'have ironed out their differences and living togetherin matomoniaihome happily, no fruitful purposewould be served in keepingthe.criminaltrial pending. Accordingly,in larger interest, FIR no. 368/2005 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPG registered at Police Station' Prashant Vihar and consequent proceedingsemanatingtherefromare quashed. Petitionis disposed ofin the above terms. Crl. M.A. 18478/2010 (Stay| Disposed of as infructuous. Dasti. DECEMBER 13, 2010 ga o- A.K. PATHAK, J.