IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Rev. No.1039 of 2010 Date of Decision: 24.09.2010 Parbal Partap Singh ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Sanjeev K. Panwar, Advocate for the petitioners. ***** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? ** NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the Order dated 01.02.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, vide which, the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C for summoning the respondent was dismissed. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that meanwhile Vimal Chauhan, husband of the deceased Rani who is the main co-accused has since been acquitted by the trial Court. Accordingly, the present revision petition is dismissed being devoid of merit. (NIRMALJIT KAUR) 24.09.2010 JUDGE gurpreet