IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH R.S.A. No. 646 of 2004 Date of decision January 15, 2007 Udey Singh .......Appellant Versus Gram Panchayat, Naya Bans, Tehsil Sampla, District Rohtak, through its Sarpanch ........Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL Present:- Sh. Narender Hooda , Advocate for the appellant. Sh. Ramesh Hooda, Advocate for the respondents. **** The plaintiff is appellant before this Court. Both the Courts below have concurrently dismissed the suit for permanent injunction. It is apparent from the perusal of the record that the Gram Panchayat had sought eviction of the plaintiff and an injunction order against him was passed on June 24, 1981. The appeal filed by the plaintiff was also dismissed by the Collector. The ejectment has thus, attained finality. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant has very fairly informed the Court that in a subsequent ejectment petition also the ejectment of the plaintiff-appellant has been ordered and his appeal has again failed. In view of the fact that plaintiff has already lost in two ejectment petitions, he cannot be heard to perpetuate his illegal possession. No question of law, much less any substantial question of R.S.A. No. 646 of 2004 -2- law, arise in the present appeal. Dismissed. (VINEY MITTAL) JUDGE January 15, 2007 archana