1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2788/1999 Naresh Chaitram Chouksey ..versus.. The Collector, Nagpur and others =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders of directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-== Ku.S.O.Tapdiya, Counsel h/f A.M.Quazi, counsel for R-4 Mr. N.W.Sambre, counsel for Respondent no.7 C ORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 2nd JULY, 2010. Counsel for the petitioner called absent. On 3rd August, 1999, the writ was admitted with refusal of interim relief. The matter is not diligently attended. It relates to grant of licence to the respondent no. 6 for retail sale of country liquor at Kamptee in the building of respondent no.7, which is allegedly on the Nazul land. The learned Tahsildar did not allow the respondent no.6 to establish the said retail out-let on the Nazul land. The writ petitioner seeks to challenge the orders of learned Collector, Nagpur, who has entertained the order of refusal of permission by learned Tahsildar. For non prosecution, writ petition dismissed. No costs. (K.U.Chandiwal) JUDGE. Rvjalit