THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.4558 & 4516 OF 2010 COMMON ORDER: 1 CRP No.4558 of 2010 is filed questioning the order dated 30.08.2010 made in I.A.No.144 of 2010 in O.S.No.89 of 2007 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Jangoan, whereby the petition filed by the petitioner under Order VI rule 17 r/w Section 151 CPC seeking permission of the court to amend the plaint was rejected. CRP No.4516 of 2010 is filed questioning the order dated 30.08.2010 made in I.A.No.143 of 2010 in the very same suit whereby the petition filed under Order VII, Rule 14 (3) r/w 151 CPC to receive certain documents was dismissed. 2 The facts in brief are that the petitioner instituted the said suit for relief of declaration of title and perpetual injunction. The petitioner submits that in the plaint it was typed as suit land is measuring to an extent of Ac.7-25 guntas covered by Sy.No.271/3. Subsequently on an application made by one Pattedar by name Jogi Reddy, the Assistant Director, District Survey and Land Records, Warangal visited the suit land on 24.10.2008 and gave sub division number as 271/2/1 and had also shown its boundaries as East: PWD Road, West: Malla Gutta, North: Agricultural Land of Veeramalla Rajeshwar Rao and South: Agricultural land of Donthi Reddy Jogi Reddy. The vendor of the petitioner had also executed a registered correction deed bearing document No.1172/2009 dt: 3.3.2009 before the Sub Registrar, Jangaon. Therefore, it necessitated the petitioner to file the present petition seeking amendment of the plaint to avoid confusion in the plaint. As stated supra, the court below rejected both the applications by its separate orders dated 30.08.2010. In view of the commonness these two revisions are disposed of by way of this common order. 3 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4 Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel for the respondents this court is of the view that the court below is justified in dismissing the said application. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that originally the plaint schedule is covered by Sy.No.271/3 and subsequently on an application made by one Pattedar by name Jogi Reddy, the Assistant Director, District Survey and Land Records, Warangal visited the suit land on 24.10.2008 and re-numbered it as 271/2/1. In those circumstances, this court is of the firm view that unless and until the said Assistant Director, District Survey and Land Records, Warangal is examined and the relevant papers are marked through him, such an amendment cannot be made and without examining him, the documents on which the petitioner places reliance also cannot be pressed into. Hence, these revisions are dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner to get the said Assistant Director, District Survey and Land Records, Warangal examined if he so chooses and get the relevant material with regard to the change of survey number marked. 5 Accordingly, these two revisions are dismissed. -------------- 29.01.2011 Kvsn