HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION gCr.) No. 552 of2009 FETITIONERS :1. Shahid Siddique S/o W.M.Siddiqus, aged about 26 years, R/o. Street N0. 3, Deepak Nagar, Durg, Tahsil & District Durg (C.G.) 2‘ Smt. Neha Noor (Neha Jain) W/o Shahid Siddiqi (D/o Abhinandan Jain) aged about 23 years, R/o Street No. 3, Deepak Nagar: Durg, Tahsil and District Durg (c.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgam, through Secretary, Department of' Home, D’K.S. Bhawan, Mantraiaya, Raipur (C.G.) RES?ONDENTS H 2. State of \Uttar Pradesh, through Secretary. Department of Home, Lucknow (U.P.) 3. The Director General of Police, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4‘ The Superintendent of Police, DistriCt Durg (C.G.) 5. The Station House Officer, P.S. Mohan Nagar, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 6. The Station House Ohicer, P.S. Saraswati Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Abhinanda Singhai s/o Late Chandrabhan Singhai: aged about 5G years: R/o Village Main’oni, Tahsii Main'oni, District Lalitpur (U.P.) ‘ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agiihotri. J. Shri Sourabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the State/ respondent No. i, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Present: ORAL ORDER (Passed on Tir—-—-—— 03 day of February, 2009) Shri Harit, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State/respondent 1: 3 4,15 and 6 submits that if a complaint is made by the petitioners to the police otficers, the same shall be taken care of immediately. 2. in View ofthe aforementioned submission, according to learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this matter. i 3. Accordingly the petition stands disposed of. 4. Consequently,pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. l Satish K. Agnih9tri f ”r. , ‘ Sdl- i n Judge” ‘l f 2 J- I ‘7 i 1L,