1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 287/2008 (Ghanshyam Lal and Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : 27/02/2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Pankaj Sharma for the petitioners. Mr. J.P.S.Choudhary, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and challan papers. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that none of the petitioners has been identified by the witnesses and no recovery has been effected from the petitioners and even according to the owner of the jeep, the jeep met with an accident near to Fatehnagar and case of the accident has been given the colour of dacoity. From the perusal of the challan papers, it no where appears that the petitioners were put to identification. In the FIR, the petitioners have not been named and nothing has been recovered from the petitioners. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, without commenting on the merit of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. 2 Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Ghanshyam Lal S/o Amrit Lal Soni and Satish S/o Kalu Ram be released on bail in FIR No.311/2007 P.S. Railmagra, district Rajsamand, provided each of them executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR), J. RP