ilGHCOURTOF CHKATTsSGARH : BILASPUR *?1\/|^IO^J gSISlvla^U "^ 1 ^N S ^d^ fl ^ B ^ B*< C <-' ^?'' li C vSS HON'BLE Si E SHR! H.L. DATTU, CJ & IPJ V.K. SHRIVASTAVA, -J. IV » •IONN0.1630F2007 Petitsoners 1} ^^B^L^S ENDRA KUMAft •—-"ECs/^ •'S^rM i1" "<X S.iJ-'vf^ years »otenn aant Xumar Shukla Low^r —Dlvision T^ft^h^r ^.^ P9 AB . -' ?• ^i ^ '. 'f^ A^ !<<jfc;&S Kft^S^UKM ^lf^EU^ 'a^i'^r-; <£*^^i:t •<;Q a^~aL5 irt;-^^^n »l;h^'4^1lrt<, •t*'^,'1 yssrs b/o' &nrf anyan"i;ai Sinha Lower-Division Teacher Both Empioyses oT ^-Viv^Ksnanc ' v^oy&ossi iv'^yy^yyvfi'ln'^-s. ' ^•^•"•s*"'1-;''"'!"'? f'iSitU'i.ii.jiOffiZ F' &l &.i:::s t&li^s ?v^9sr, Kois, j^Sipur (O^jj rtes|3on0enis 'i STATE OF CHKATTiSGARH Througb Priric'pai Secretary Scheduied iribe Weirare c'eoartment Govt of Chhatfisgarh Msntrslaya DKS •Bhawan, Raipur (CG) 2) ViVSKANAND ^ V)DYAP£ETH, ,"rt&rrjchtT? P/5i'^rr^h'sr'c- 33 : i;\i Iwi i3 3^.3 I u<i Gti U'l EiAi i<«s' ritE?*'n';:fr Kf^tffl i~?sm;j;'' ;('.t-Bi E'litfiS-^5^i !'i'..t».;fcffi ; s''..SSit-^wS: ^'i.-t*'^<Sf (Pubiic —TfustRs-od No.187) .; •^.^.. • cl,^/-w--.~.<-^.,^< ; n^Oijgy'; > oec^eia^y 3) THE GOLLECTOR Schecuie T?"h*~- S,-- !-^'^h^t^'- ;l;-niri '*:?lc?f?> E i ^i-^^ ^- ^-^^^ i I^-^ri^ J^i^rf" '••'^t.-^r-l-'^-- WSiTB^S USQ3rTH13Ht Coliectorate Raiour (CGj ?^'E"S S°;£?•E° S. iT'i |rf'p«i'E"':'=»^"^'t' "iri Vaibhav Govercsban, counsei for the petltioners. hn Prashant IViisnra, Addi. Advocate Gsnsrai for the r^*« OFyi,i- (Passed ors 3ro Aori!. 2007! x The foilowina oral order of the Court was oassed W H.L. Dcttu, CJ. We had heard the matter on 2-4-2007, out, because of paucity w tlme, we couid not dictate thejudgmentand, thersfore, had adjourneci the matter to 3-4-2007. 2i Shri V.G. Tamaskar. learned counse! aopearing fo* the oetitionsr has fiied a memo before the Registry. in ihat msmo, hs has stated that owing to his persona! engagement eisewhere he may not be abie to appear befors the Court on 3-4-2007. 3) We raally appreciate the high standard of actvocacy maintainsd by Shri V.G. Tamaskar. He has Informed the Court that since the matter is part heard, his absence may oe excussd, but agaln he hss not asked for anv adiOurnment. 4) Petisioners are workina as Lower Dlvlsion Teache's in schooi run by the secona respondent. The second respondent is a Pubilc Trust. it has its registered office at Ramkrishna Psramhans Naggr, Kota, Rsipur, CG. 5) First psSitioner was appointea as Lower Divssion Tsachsr byths second resoondent —Truston 15-7-1993 and seconc! ost'tioner was appointed gs Lower Division Teacher on 5-1-19S6. The Trust is fuliy alded educationa! ins'gtution. 6) In this writ petition fiisd under Articles 22S/227 o° the ConsStution of India, the ostitioners ars caiiinfl in ausstion the ieaaiiiv cr othsrwise of the advertisement issusd bv ths secona resoonosnt 1" a ioca; newspaper, namely, Dain'k Bhaskar, Raipur, catec 29-11-2005 whsreirr the secona respondsnt has calied for the appiications from the eHGible csndidates for appolntment of teachers on contract basis. .^ \.. 7) First and foremost, 't is not a Pubilc 'riterest Lit;gation, since nowhere in the petition, the Detreioners have statsd Shat it is the P'L and seconciiv thev rsave not even oaia the securltv aeoosit as recsuired underthe Hlgh Court of Chhsfiisgarh Ruies, 2005. 8) Looking to the avermenis made in the wrlt petition, at the most K can onlv be a orivate interest iitiaation between ths getitioners and the second respondent. To maintain a petltlon under Articis 226 of the Constitution, the Detitioners who comes before thls Coun. shouid bs aagrisved gsrsons. Nowhers in the instant oetition, it is stated that how the petitioners would be sggrieved by the advertissment issued by ti~e second resoondsnt for appointment of teachers on contract basis. 9) in view o* the above. ws cannot entertain this writ Detitlon under ArrinlA ?''?R "f fh^ (^ftf^fif; ifirsn rvf in'4;?s tslnr:^; th?s r'Qtlfir-n^.i-t;; JiU^aa^^ ^iit-s/'S^ i.^i'CT ^~^?^^§^-i3^5 &*r^ ^»^ aggrisved psrsons to maintain th's writ petition. Accorcingly the wrii pet;tion requires to be rejected andjs_re|ected, Ordered accordingiy. Scf/- "•L.Dattu chiefJustice Sd/- V.K. Shrivastava Judge