IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 25TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 3RD ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 32040 of 2006(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ P.D.THOMAS, PULICKAL HOUSE, P.T.M.S., ERATTUPETTA. BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENTS: ------------- THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, IDUKKI. BY G.P.SRI. BENJAMIN PAUL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/09/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC.NO.32040/2006 APPENDIX PETITIONER's EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 COPY OF THE MEMO DTD 28..6.2006 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P2 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD 20.11.2006 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ cl ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C).NO.32040 OF 2006-L ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 25th day of September, 2007. JUDGMENT Against Ext.P1 memo, objection has been filed by the petitioner as per Ext.P2. Complaint of the petitioner is that orders have not been passed on his objection and that he is prevented from pursuing his statutory remedies. 2. Taking into account the submissions made by the petitioner and the Government Pleader for the respondent, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P1 taking into account the objection filed by the petitioner. Orders shall be passed with notice to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. In the meantime, order dated 4.12.2006 will continue. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE cl