IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39940 of 2011 Md. Idan Mian, son of Md. Nasruddin Mian ------Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar -------Opposite Party ******** For the petitioner : Mr. S. A. Ahmad, Adv. For the State : Ms. Sharda Kumari, APP ****** 02. 09.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Upahara P.S. Case No. 51/09 for offences under Sections 341/323/354 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added, is solitary named accused in this case of interception and assault. Submission is of false implication due to dispute arising out of petty unconnected matters. Further submission is that parties have resolved the disputes and accordingly petition of compromise has been filed and lying pending with the record of the court below. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of informant appearing before the court below support factum and contents of compromise with her free-will and consent and without any coercion and her husband also stood as one of the bailors, and in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Upahara P.S. Case No. 51/09, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)