IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.1607 OF 2006 WRIT PETITON NO.1607 OF 2006 WRIT PETITON NO.1607 OF 2006 Shri Nagnath Jyotiram Jadhav ..Petitioner. V/s. The General Manager, Pune Municipal Transport Undertaking & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.G.B.Badiger for petitioner. Mr.R.G.Ketkar for respondent Nos.1 & 2. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. CORAM : V.C.DAGA, J. DATED : 25TH APRIL, 2006. DATED : 25TH APRIL, 2006. DATED : 25TH APRIL, 2006. P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. By no stretch of imagination, the impugned order can be said to be a perverse order. This Court not being a Court of appeal, is not expected to appreciate the evidence. Petition is devoid of any substance and the same is dismissed in limine, with no order as to costs. ******