IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.29026 of 2010 SURENDRA PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 10. 08. 2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being Depot Manager is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section of 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. It is alleged that sample of rice being collected from F.C.I. godown found not upto to the mark to be fit for human consumption. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not incharge of procuring grains and he is only entitled to keep the grains which is procured under F.C.I. and there is no allegation of any variation of stock of F.C.I. Considering the submissions, let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah, in connection with Chanpatia P.S. Case No. 170 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. m.p. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)