*1* wp.5747.11.919.sxw kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5747 OF 2011 Bhimashankar Ganpatrao Patil and others. ..Petitioners ­Versus­ The State of Maharashtra and others. ..Respondents .......... Mr.Vishwanath Patil i/b Mr.Yuwraj D. Patil, for the Petitioners. Ms.P.S.Cardozo, AGP, for the Respondents/State. .......... CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. Date : 27th July, 2011. P.C.: 1 The Petitioners are aggrieved by the concurrent orders made by the authorities under the Mamaltadars’ Courts Act, 1906. The only contention raised before me is that the principles of natural justice have been violated by the Tahasildar, Akkalkot while passing his order. From perusal of both orders and particularly that of the Tahasildar, it is apparent that the application under section 5 has been made on 27.08.2003 and the same has been decided on 20.12.2003. Prior thereto, the Petitioners and others who are parties to the said application were given notice. The Tahasildar visited the spot on 19.12.2003. He has recorded the statements. A panchanama is also drawn. All these documents have been duly signed by the parties. Consistent with the contents of the said documents, the authorities have come to the conclusion that the obstruction to the road needs to be removed. The existence of road has also been established in the light of the inquiry *2* wp.5747.11.919.sxw made and documents produced. For all these reasons and when this Court cannot scrutinize the material as if it is exercising the appellate power, there is no merit in the Writ Petition and it is summarily dismissed. No costs. (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J)