IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.23060-M of 2010 Date of Decision:23.9.2010 Baljeet Singh and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram Jain, Addl. A.G. Haryana. Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate for Smt. Saroj. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (Oral) The present petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 109 dated 1.5.2010 registered under Sections 306/309/498-A/34 IPC at Police Station Sadar Sonepat. In the present case, one lady and four children lost their lives. The investigation is still going on. Saroj (jethani of deceased) and deceased Kaushlya tried to commit suicide. The son of Kaushlya made a statement that Saroj had pushed them into canal. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of said Saroj has vehemently opposed the bail application on the ground that the petition i.e. Crl. M. No.16822-M of 2010 praying for CBI enquiry is pending. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State on instructions from ASI Paramvir Singh states that there is no allegation against the present petitioners nor are they required. It is also not disputed that the petitioners are not named in the FIR. Accordingly, order dated 11.8.2010 is made absolute and the petition is allowed as such. 23.9.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE