IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-23219 of 2009 Date of Decision: October 21, 2009 Gurjit Singh @ Jaggi ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND Present : Ms. Monika Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. BBS Teji, AAG, Punjab. *** S.D. Anand, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states at the bar that the petitioner has entered appearance before the learned Trial Court in compliance with the order dated 24.08.2009 and has been admitted to interim bail. Learned State counsel states that as no-one has turned up to instruct him, he is not in a position to concede or controvert that averment. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has made the averment at the bar. In the light thereof, the order dated 24.08.2009 is made absolute. Disposed of accordingly. October 21, 2009 ( S.D. Anand ) vinod Judge