1 mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.2794 OF 2004 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.______ OF 2004 WITH CRE NO.2794 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO.2794 OF 2004 Mrs.Pushpa J. Shetty Plaintiff versus Minaz Ahmed Shaikh and others Defendants Mr.Anup Khaitan for plaintiff. Mr.N.V.Khan i/by Baptist D'Souza for defendant no.3. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 1st April 2011 PC : 1. Learned advocate for the plaintiff states that he has instructions to delete the names of defendant nos.1 and 2 in the above suit and that the suit be dismissed against the said defendants. In view thereof, the suit is dismissed against defendant nos.2 and 3 as not pressed. 2. Learned advocates appearing for the plaintiff and defendant no.3 have tendered consent terms dated 31st March 2011. They submit that the consent terms be taken on record and the suit be disposed of in terms of the consent terms dated 31st March 2011. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The consent terms are signed by the plaintiff and the defendant no.3. The consent terms are also signed by the advocate for the plaintiff and the advocate for the defendant no.3. The consent terms are interpreted in Hindi to defendant no.3 by the 2 office of Interpreter, High Court, Bombay. The suit between the plaintiff and the defendant no.3 is disposed of in terms of the consent terms marked "X". The Court Receiver stands discharged subject to payment of costs, charges and expenses by the defendant no.3 within a period of two weeks from today. Refund of court, if any, as per rules. The draft Notice of Motion also stands disposed of. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)