IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI FRIDAY, THE 2ND JANUARY 2009 / 12TH POUSHA 1930 WP(Crl.).No. 471 of 2008(S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SAREENA @ NISHA BHAI, W/O.ABDUL HAMEED, C-12/389, YAMUNA VIHAR, DELHI-13. BY ADV. SRI.SALIM V.S. RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUPDT. OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUR. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.R.LAKSHMI NARAYAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(CRL) NO.471 OF 2008 APPENDIX EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 28.12.2008 //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. P.R.RAMAN & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. ------------------------------- W.P.(Crl) No.471 of 2008 ------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd January, 2009 J U D G M E N T Raman, J. This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to produce the body of Sri.Abdul Hameed, the husband of the petitioner, from the custody of the respondents. It is alleged that the husband of the petitioner was taken into custody by the second respondent on 25.12.2008 morning, without disclosing the reason for taking him into custody. It is further alleged that the arrest is not recorded. Though a representation was made to the Director General of Police, he did not evoke any response. Hence this writ petition. 2. When the matter came up for consideration before this Court on 30.12.2008, the same was adjourned to today, so as to enable the Government Pleader to get instructions in the matter. W.P.(Crl) No.471 of 2008 2 The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that Abdul Hameed was arrested under the provisions of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and also for various offences under Indian Penal Code. The detenu was produced before the Magistrate court and by an order of that court, he was remanded to judicial custody. Without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek appropriate remedies, if he is aggrieved by such action, the writ petition is closed. P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE. nj.