IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2008 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1930 W.P(C).No. 9670 of 2008(A) --------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- 1. ANIL J KUMAR, PARVATHY BHAVAN, MANJADY P.O., THIRUVALLA. 2. E.R.RAJAN PILLAI, NIRMALAYAM, MADAPPILLY P.O., CHANGANASSERY. BY ADV. SRI.P. HARIDAS RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. CHIEF MANAGER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, THIRUVALLA MAIN BRANCH. BY ADV. SRI.SATHISH NINAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/04/2008, ALONG WITH WPC NO.9671 OF 2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NOs. 9670 & 9671 OF 2008 ======================== Dated this the 2nd day of April, 2008 J U D G M E N T In these writ petitions, the challenge is against notices issued under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. At this stage, it is for the petitioners to file their replies to the notices under Section 13(2) and thereafter the Bank is statutorily obliged to pass orders under Section 13 (3)(A). 2. In my view, the challenge raised against notices at this stage is premature and does not call for examination in proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. Without prejudice to the contention of the petitioners, these writ petitions are closed. The submission of the counsel for the Bank that if Ext.P3 has been received that will be duly adverted is recorded. ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE. Rp