- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3958/2009 Prakash Kamlakar Pathak. ...Petitioner.. Versus The State of Maharashtra & others. ...Respondents... ..... Shri A.N. Irpatgire, Advocate for petitioner. Shri N.H. Borade, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3. Shri V.D. Hon, Advocate for respondent nos.4 to 6. Respondent no.7 served. ..... CORAM: K.K. TATED, J. DATE: 05.09.2009 PER COURT: Heard respective counsel. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 8.5.2009 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad, in Revision Petition No.9/2009 rejecting the petitioner’s application for stay. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent no.4, without following procedure as - 2 - prescribed u/s 101 (4) and 93(2)(c) of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1955, allotted work to several contractors. As per order dated 26.8.2009, learned A.G.P. appearing on behalf of the State, submitted report prepared by Public Works Department. The said report shows that maximum work is completed by the contractors. Considering these facts and as the revision petition is pending before the Additional Commissioner, present writ petition is dismissed with a direction to the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad, to dispose of Revision Petition No.9/2009 within six months from the receipt of copy of this order. Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. (K.K. Tated, J.) ndk/c59098