IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41270 of 2008 BIJAY KUMAR @ VIJAY KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH VIGILANCE. ----------- 4/ 16/12/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the Vigilance Department. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under Sections- 420, 120b, 409, 467, 468 AND 471 of I.P.C., read with the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not concerned with procedural irregularities in the department in placing of orders when he has supplied goods on payment made. Learned counsel for Vigilance Department points out from paragraph-51 of the case diary that the goods was, in fact, never supplied and there was only paper transaction. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail shall be considered by the court below on its own merits, without being prejudiced by the present order. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)