IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5068 OF 2007 MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5068 OF 2007 MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5068 OF 2007 in in in FERA APPEAL (St) NO.23121 of 2007 FERA APPEAL (St) NO.23121 of 2007 FERA APPEAL (St) NO.23121 of 2007 Messrs Anjani Agrico Implements Messrs Anjani Agrico Implements Messrs Anjani Agrico Implements Limited .. Appellant Limited .. Appellant Limited .. Appellant Versus Versus Versus 1.Union of India & ors ..Respondent 1.Union of India & ors ..Respondent 1.Union of India & ors ..Respondents ---- ---- ---- Mr.Tushar V.Shah with Ms Nirmala Vyas Mr.Tushar V.Shah with Ms Nirmala Vyas Mr.Tushar V.Shah with Ms Nirmala Vyas for Appellant for Appellant for Appellant Mr.A.S.Rao for Respondents Mr.A.S.Rao for Respondents Mr.A.S.Rao for Respondents ---- ---- ---- CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND R.S.MOHITE, JJ R.S.MOHITE, JJ R.S.MOHITE, JJ DATED: 30th NOVEMBER DATED: 30th NOVEMBER DATED: 30th NOVEMBER, 2007 2007 2007 PC PC PC 1. There is a delay of about 47 days in preferring 1. There is a delay of about 47 days in preferring 1. There is a delay of about 47 days in preferring the appeal. the appeal. the appeal. 2. Heard parties. Cause shown in the application 2. Heard parties. Cause shown in the application 2. Heard parties. Cause shown in the application is sufficient cause. In the light of that, delay is is sufficient cause. In the light of that, delay is is sufficient cause. In the light of that, delay is condoned. Office to register the appeal. condoned. Office to register the appeal. condoned. Office to register the appeal. (F.I.Rebello,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite, J) (R.S.Mohite, J) (R.S.Mohite, J) : 2 : : 2 : : 2 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVILJURISDICTI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVILJURISDICTI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVILJURISDICTION CEXA APPEAL NO. OF 2007 CEXA APPEAL NO. OF 2007 CEXA APPEAL NO. OF 2007 .. Appellant .. Appellant .. Appellant Versus Versus Versus ..Respondent ..Respondent ..Respondent ---- ---- ---- Mr. for the Appellant Mr. for the Appellant Mr. for the Appellant Mr. for Respondent Mr. for Respondent Mr. for Respondent ---- ---- ---- : 3 : : 3 : : 3 : Coram: F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram: F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram: F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date: 30th November, 2007 Date: 30th November, 2007 Date: 30th November, 2007 PC PC PC 1. There is a delay of 47 days in preferring this 1. There is a delay of 47 days in preferring this 1. There is a delay of 47 days in preferring this appeal. Heard parties. Cause shown in the appeal. Heard parties. Cause shown in the appeal. Heard parties. Cause shown in the application is sufficient cause. In the light of application is sufficient cause. In the light of application is sufficient cause. In the light of that delay is condoned. Office to register the that delay is condoned. Office to register the that delay is condoned. Office to register the appeal. appeal. appeal. (F.I.Rebello,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite, J) (R.S.Mohite, J) (R.S.Mohite, J)