"^iW^iffi^ff^i^S^^^B^^^^^^^S HIGH COORT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(CINOJ7206/2007 Bliakfavachalam, S/o. Shri Narayaa, Aged about 40 years, Sole Proprietor of M/ s. Agra Traders, Tulsipur Wai-d No.19, Rajnaadgaon, Pennanent Resideat of 78-1, Nathanikoti Noi-fh, Ta&sU Peraurani Disttict Taajore (Taaul Nadu) preseufly residing at Ward No.19, Tulsipur, Rajnaudgaon, Distiict Rajnandgaon (CG) Versus ~J 2. o. o. State of Chhattisgarh, Througn fhe Secretars', Honie Departi&ent, DKS BhawaB., Raipur (CG) Du-ector General of PoUce, Police Head Quarter, Raipur (CG) laspector General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Rajnaadgaon (CG) Supermtendent of Rajaandgaon, PoUce, District The Coliector, Rainandgaou, District Rainaiidgaoa (CG) Station House Officer, City Kotwali, Rainandgaon, Shri S.S.Shaniia, City Kottvali, RaJBaadgaon, District Rajuaridgaoa (CG) Tin iSBi Hon'ble T^r.^atish K. Agniliotri. J.i Shri P.Diwakai', Senior Advocate wifh Shri P.R.Patarikai-, counsel tbr uie petitioner. ShriA.S.KacIlhawalia, Govenunent Advocate for fhe State. on this 5th day of g^a^'y^ -2.. ^ 1. Leamed counsel appearuig for tlie petitlouer submits fhat the petitioner is being fhreateaed by fhe poUce Of&cers aad the petitioner has inade a coiaplauut to the Superintendent of PoUce, Rajnaiidgaon, District Rajnaadgaon to that effect but no action has been taken by fbe Superiiitendent of Police. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the respoudents/State submits that fhe police aufhorities aiid otlier aufboriti.es are under aa obligation to act in accordaiice wifh law. If there is a coBiplamt, fhere is no reason why fhe Superinteudent of Police should not take action. 3. In view ofthe foregoiiig, fhis petition is disposed ofwith. a direction to fhe Superintendebiit of Police, Rajnaadgaon to look into fh.e applicatious dated 26/11/2007 Emd 27.11.2007 (Aanexure P/4) aad take appropriate steps as required under tiie law. The petitioner .is at Hberty to niake fresli also, il so advised. apulications Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Sugun.a