IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3522 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 18.12.2009 Gurvail Singh and another .....Petitioners versus Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Ghulam Nabi Malik, Advocate, for the petitioners. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) As per the office report, service is complete. No one, however, appears on behalf of the respondents. This revision petition is directed by the plaintiffs against the order dated 8.6.2009 passed by the Additional District Judge (Adhoc), Tarn-Taran, whereby in an appeal preferred by the respondent-PSEB authorities against the order dated 1.11.2008 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Patti, in a matter under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC, has been allowed and the ad-interim injunction granted to the plaintiffs has been set-aside. The main grievance of the petitioner-plaintiffs is that they C.R. No.3522 of 2009 (O&M) 2 were not served in the above mentioned appeal which has been allowed ex-parte. In the absence of any opposition to the above-noticed factual contention raised on behalf of the petitioners, the impugned order dated 8.6.2009 is set-aside and the matter is remitted to the learned Additional District Judge (Adhoc), Tarn-Taran, to decide the appeal filed by the respondents on merits and in accordance with law. The status-quo, as was directed by this Court vide order dated 22.6.2009 shall be maintained by the parties till the appeal is decided on merits. Dasti. 18-12-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE