r\ 2 o HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. ’HON'BLE SHRI L;C. BHADOO, J. Writ Pe‘I'iTion No. 916 of 2003 Shankar In! Loniya, 5/0. Trimbak Loniya, aged abou‘r 38 years, R/o. Loniyapam Village - Ghu'rku, Tahsi! - Takha‘l'pur, P.S. Sarkandn, Dis‘H'. Biiaspur (C.G.) & All residenfs of Loniyapam viHage — Ghu‘rku, Pefi‘rioner- : Versus Respondents: 1. 5mm of Chha‘h’isgarh, Through Collector, Bilaspur Office CollecTom‘l’e, Bilaspur ($6.) 2. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) 3 (5.D.O.) Ko‘l'a, Dis'r‘r. Biiaspur (6.6.) Shri R.K. Gupfa, Tahsildnr', Sub-Tahsil Officer. Ganiyhr‘i/Sakri, Tahsii - Takhd‘rpur', Disf‘r. Biiaspur (C.6.) ' 3. 4. ‘Shr'i Narmada Prasad Tandon, P.H. No.30, Pa'rwari, Sub Tahsii Ganiyari/Sakri, R/o. Jarhabha‘i‘a, Biiaspur, Disff. Bilaspur (C.6.) > 5. Hirendra Kumar, S/o. Dinesh Narayan Agrawai, aged abou'l’ 60 years, R/o. Bha‘i’apar'a, Tahsil-Bha‘i'apara, Dis‘i‘i. Raipur' (6.6.) Padmawa‘l'i, age about 69 year's Shakun‘raia Bai, aged abouf 68 years Ur-mila Bai, aged aboui' 63 years. Uma Bai, aged aboui' 58 years N\OMG‘i Ram Sahéli bai, aged aboui‘ 56 years. d 11. 12. 13. g 7W Gaufam bai, aged abouf 49 years, all The daugh‘rers of Dinesh Namyan Agmwal, R/o. Ehafapam, Tahsi! ~ Bhafapam, Disft Raipur (6.6.) Through - Her Gen. Power of A‘H'or-ney Holder Shri Hirendm Kumar, 5/0. Dinesh Namyan Agmwnl Chain Bai, W/o. Ramjhui Loniya Ramjhu! S/o. Goverdhan Bofh 'i'he respondenf : R/a Loniyapaml viilage - Ghu‘rku, Tah - Takhnfpur, DisfT. Eilaspur (C.6.) Wri‘l’ Pefi‘rion under Arficles 226 & 227 of Consfi‘rufion of India Presem : Shri U1k’arsh Verma, counset for fhe pe'l'i'rioner. Shri MP5 Bha'ria, Panel lawyer for fhe Sla‘l'e / responden‘rs No.1 & 2. ’ Shri Praahan‘r Jayaswal, Senior Advocate wiTh Shri All Asgar, counsel for responden‘l’s No.12 & 13. The foilowing order of rhe Cour-f was passed by Rajeev Gup'ra, CJ. Learned counsel for the parties are heard on admission. 2) Pe‘ri‘lioner‘ Shankar Lal has filed fhls wrif pe‘ri'rion sfyled as Public Inferesf Ll‘l’lga‘rlon for The following reliefs : (1) (2) To declare The so—calied sale deed execufed by Respondenf No.5 To 11 in favour of respondent No.12 as null and void. ORDER (13*h February, 2008) To direct The responden‘rs ‘ro gef ‘lhe Tank in i‘l's previous form. (3) (4) 3) On due consideration of submissions of learned counsel for The par'iies and nai'ure of The reliefs sough‘i' in This wrif pe‘ri‘rion, we are of The opinion fha'r 'rhe wri‘i- pefifion is no? mainfainable as PIL. (5) To refrain fhe responden‘rs from inferfering info fhe peaceful use of The Tank by fhe villager-s. Issue any o'rher wri'r or- wri‘rs, order or orders, direcfion or directions, which This Hon’ble Court deems fif and proper in fhe facfs and circumstances of fhe case, 6mm‘ cost of The pe‘rifion. 4) The wrif peril-ion, Therefore, is liable 1-0 be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summarily. A //is Sdl- Sd/- ' we mafLJuslJCrei ‘ L,c.eHADoo