:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. APPEAL NO.597 OF 2005 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1319 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.1211 OF 2005 M/s.Rado Construction .. Appellant v/s. Mr.Bankaprasad B. Gupta .. Respondent Mr.Rajiv Narula with Ms.Srikrishna with Ms.Payal Daftari, Ms.Ketki Furia i/by M/s.Shaunak Satpute & Co. for the appellant. Ms.Amita R. Dwivedi for the respondent. CORAM : R.M. LODHA AND J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 20th July, 2005 P.C. Heard. 2. Save and except the clarification that the order of status-quo shall not come in the way of the concerned authority/authorities for consideration of the Slum Development Scheme submitted by the present appellant for development of the subject property, the impugned order does not call for any interference. 3. With the aforesaid clarification, the appeal is disposed of. (R.M. (R.M. (R.M. LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) LODHA, J.) :2: (J.P. (J.P. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) DEVADHAR, J.) DEVADHAR, J.)