WPMS 74/2002 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Heard Sri Lok Pal Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Navneet Kaushik, learned Counsel for the respondent no. 1. Petitioners have challenged the orders dated 9.2.2001 and 4.1.2002 passed by the Settlement Officer, Consolidation and District Deputy Director of Consolidation, Haridwar respectively. Petitioners and respondents are the co- tenure holders of Gata No. 653. It is stated that the parties had entered into the compromise and the objections were decided by the Consolidation Officer by his order dated 3.10.1997 in terms of the said compromise. But subsequently by the impugned orders passed by the appellate court and revisional court, petitioners are being affected adversely inasmuch as the courts below have not considered the actual value of the land in dispute. Therefore, writ petition is allowed and the impugned orders dated 9.2.2001 and 4.1.2002 are hereby set aside. Matter is remanded back to the District Deputy Director of Consolidation, Haridwar who shall decide the dispute afresh in the light of the compromise. (P.C.V., J.) 28.8.2008 Prabodh