1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Contempt Petition No.260 of 2010 In Writ Petition No.3498 of 2009 (D) (Gopal s/o Kashinathrao Pawar v. Omprakash Bakoria, C.E.O., Zilla Parishad, Amravati, and another) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri Rahul Tajne, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri J.B. Kasat, Advocate for Respondents. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 17 th February, 2011 Shri Tajne, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that all the grounds raised in the contempt petition have not been considered by the authority concerned. However, if the order impugned suffers from non-application of mind to certain grounds raised, that cannot be a subject matter of the contempt petition. He further submits that the rest of the order has been complied with. In view of this, nothing survives in the contempt petition. The contempt proceedings are, therefore dropped. It is open for the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the authority concerned. Judge pdl