THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA S.A. No. 1191 of 2008 Judgment: This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 08.02.2008, passed by the VI Additional District Judge, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District, dismissing the appeal in A.S. No. 88 of 2007 and confirming the judgment and decree dated 06.06.2005, passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Pargi, partly decreeing the suit in O.S. No. 89 of 1998. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the judgments under appeal. Both the trial Court and the appellate Court upon appreciation of evidence, both oral and documentary, placed on record, have concurrently found that the appellant failed to prove oral partition said to have been taken between them in the month of May, 1975 and that he has right and title over the land in an extent of 0.24 gts. in Sy. No. 439, and therefore, he is not entitled for declaration of his right and title over the same and much less perpetual injunction. The above findings arrived at by the Courts below being concurrent findings of fact, and there being no question of law, much less substantial question of law involved in the second appeal, I find no reason whatsoever to interfere with the judgment under appeal nor admit the second appeal in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Hence, there is no merit in the second appeal, and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: December, 2009. KSR