IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2011 / 10TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 21219 of 2011(B) -------------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------- NEEMA SUDHAKAR, 28 YEARS, D/O. SUDHAKARAN MASTER, 'SUDHA' HOUSE, MUTTUNGAL AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK. BY ADVs. SRI.PULIKKOOL ABUBACKER SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL RESPONDENTS: ------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 014. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676 505. 4. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VENGARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676 506. 5. CORPORATE MANAGER, KUNDILPARAMBU M.L.P SCHOOL ARAKKAL THENNALA VENGARA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676 506. BY SRI. V. VIJULAL, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.21219/2011 A P P E N D I X PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1 : COPY OF ORDER DTD. 17.6.11. EXT. P2 : COPY OF REQUEST DTD. 25.6.11. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL. // True Copy // P.A. to Judge. smp T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.21219 OF 2011 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of September, 2011. J U D G M E N T The petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondents 4 and 5 to implement Ext.P1 order passed by the Additional Director of Public Instruction (Academic). She was working as Lower Primary School Assistant in the school managed by the 5th respondent from 15.07.2006. 2. Learned Government Pleader on getting instructions submitted that implementation of Ext.P1 is stayed by the Government in a revision petition filed by the Manager of the school and the revision petition itself is posted for hearing on 22.09.2011. In that view of the matter, as the Government has already entertained the revision petition, at this stage this Court will not W.P.(C) No.21219/2011 2 be justified in issuing any direction. While hearing the revision petition, the petitioner will also be heard. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp