IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 652 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO. 665 OF 2005 Ramesh Anji Ganatra.... ...... ......Plaintiff. V/s Indu Pratapsinh Ganatra.... ...... ......Defendant. Ms.S.R.Kumbhat i/by Mr.K.K.Tated, Adv. for the plaintiff. Mr.Virendra Kanojia, Adv. for the defendant. CORAM: A.P.DESHPANDE, J. 5/6/08 PC: Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff so also the defendant. By this chamber summons the plaintiff is proposing to amend the plaint and intends to place on record copies of receipts in regard to payments made by cheque for purchase of suit flat. It is averred in para 2 of the plaint that the plaintiff has purchased the suit flat on 14.6.99 from Mukesh Enterprises at Rs.2,29,25/- and paid the entire consideration by cheque No.703463 drawn on Bank of Baroda and an amount of Rs.8150/- was paid by cheuqe No.703465 yet again drawn on Bank of Baroda towards charges of Sneh Parag cooperative housing society. Though categorical averments in regard to payment 1 by cheque were made in the plaint the receipts were not filed on record and hence by the present amendment averments made in para 2 of the plaint are further clarified and are sought to be substantiated by producing receipts on record. The proposed amendment is clarificatory in nature and does not cause any prejudice to the defendant. Learned counsel for the defendant has objected to production of said receipts on the ground that they are belatedly filed. I do not find any justification in rejecting the proposed amendment. Thus allowing the chamber summons the proposed amendment is allowed. Chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 5.6.08 2