IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 13TH AUGUST 2010 / 22ND SRAVANA 1932 WP(C).No. 24026 of 2010(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MR.P.I.ABDUL NAZAR,AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.P.K.IBRAHIM,PARAKATT HOUSE,VAZHAKKALA, KOCHI-30. BY ADV. SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU SRI.JAGAN GEORGE SRI.P.G.PRAMOD SRI.KANDAMPULLY RAHUL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, VIKAS BHAVAN,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. GENERAL MANAGER,DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE,ERNAKULAM,COCHIN-20. GOVT. PLEADER SHRI.P.NARAYANAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/08/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 24026 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 13th day of August, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner applied for allotment of 25 cents of land in the Industrial Development Area, Edayar, for setting up an industrial unit. According to the petitioner, formalities have been completed except to hand over possession of the plot. But the petitioner is not being given possession of the land, is the grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition. 2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the provisional allotment to the petitioner has been cancelled, against which, the petitioner can file an appeal. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been communicated with any orders cancelling the provisional allotment. 3. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition with the following directions: The 3rd respondent shall communicate a copy of the order passed in this regard to the petitioner within one week from today. It would be open to the petitioner to seek appellate remedies against that order. I make it clear that I have not considered the rival contentions on merits and the contentions of the petitioner are left open. It would be open to the petitioner to seek stay of further proceedings before the appellate authority. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2