WP 8397/10 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8397 OF 2010 (Shri. Bharat s/o. Dagdu Kardure Vs. Rohit s/o. Bharat Kardure & Ors. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. R.P. Bhumkar, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. A.V. Patil, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 7th March, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard Advocate Shri. Bhumkar for petitioner and Advocate Shri. Patil for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. By impugned order passed below Exh. 9 in R.C.S.No. 395/2009 Trial Court has granted interim maintenance to the applicant's wife, minor son and minor daughter from the date of application. 2. Shri. Bhumkar contends that petitioner is not in possession of any land and therefore, is not in a position to pay interim maintenance. He is inviting attention to mutation entries at page No. 22 to substantiate his contention. 3. Shri. Patil, on the other hand, states that the relevant facts are looked into by the Trial Court and there is no jurisdictional error or perversity. 4. After hearing respective counsel, I find that material relevant for adjudication has been looked into and thereafter WP 8397/10 2 a finding has been recorded by the Trial Court. I therefore do not see any jurisdictional error or perversity. Petition is therefore not entertained and is rejected. 5. However, in the interest of justice, proceedings in R.C.S. No. 395/2009 are expedited at the request of learned counsel for petitioner. The Trial Court is directed to decide the same within a period of one year from the date of communication of this order. 6. The amount deposited by petitioner in this Court should be transferred to the Trial Court. [ B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. ] ssc/wp8397.10