/f ^o \>'-\° HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGAIWATBILASPUR DiVJSIONeENCH '' • . 1..'1 GORAM: HON'BLESHRIRAJEEVGUPTA,C.J. HO^'BLESHRIRANGNATHCHAftlDRAKAR,J -'2- ADpetlants Claimants Respondents MAN0.6796T2006 1 Rajman, S/o Mahadev Murta, Aged about 55 yeare, R/o Viltage Ra|kot, PS Kodenar, Tehsil - Jagdalpur, Dist Baster(CG) 2 Smt Sukri, W/o Rajman, Ca?te - Muria Aged about 53 iyears, R/b - vtNage Rajkot, PS - Kodenar, Tehsil - Jagdalpur, Distt - Baster (CG) Versus 1 Mohan Singh @ Dinesh S/o Jaggu Singh Chadda Aged about 35 years, R/b Hikmipara, Jagdalpur, Tehsil - Jagdalpur. Dist - Baster (CG) (Dwer) 2 Sanjay Heliwal, S/o CL Heiiwal aged about 36 years R/o'Laluram Colony, KorbaDistKorba(CG) At Present - New Market Main road, Bacheli, Distt Dantewada, (CG) (Owner) 3 Divisional Manager, New India Insurance Company Ltd., Branch Office, Near Jhankar Takies, Tehsil ^ Jagdalpur, Dist Baster (CG) Misc Appeal under Section 173 of the Notor Vehicte Act. 1^8 Present : None for the appeiiants. None for respondents Np.1 & 2though served. Shri Anand Gupta; counsel for respondent No.3. ORDiR ith (11tnJanuary,2010) ^SBa \ ..^- subbu 1 ! A\ ii:U 1 ^ The following order of th@ Cbvrt was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J, None for the appellants. 2) As there is no re(wesentattorr on behalf of theappellar^, we are left with no other option.but todismiss the appeat fty wafit of prosecutlon. 3) The appeat, therefpre, te cUsmissed forwant^^c^ Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- i R.N. Chandrakar \ Judge