IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 27TH OCTOBER 2009 / 5TH KARTHIKA 1931 WP(C).No. 30368 of 2009(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. RADHA RAJAPPAN,W/O.LATE RAJAPPAN, VALAKADAVIL,EDASSERIMALA,ARANMULA,PATHANAMTHITTA. 2. ARYA RAJAPPAN, (MINOR), D/O.LATE RAJAPPAN, VALAKADAVIL,EDASSERIMALA,ARANMULA,PATHANAMTHITTA. (REPRESENTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER) 3. SACHU RAJAPPAN, (MINOR), S/O.LATE RAJAPPAN, VALAKADAVIL,EDASSERIMALA,ARANMULA,PATHANAMTHITTA. (REPRESENTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER). BY ADV. SRI.JACOB P.ALEX RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL,OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A&E),KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695 039. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION,PATHANAMTHITTA. 3. A.K.OMANA,SASTHAMPARAMBIL,NADUVILE MURI, THALAVADI.PO,KUTTANAD. 4. HONEY RAJ,SASTHAMPARAMBIL,NADUVILE MURI, THALAVADI.PO,KUTTANAD. MS.ANU SIVARAMAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.30368 of 2009 --------------------------------- Dated, this the 27th day of October, 2009 J U D G M E N T The 1st petitioner claims to be the wife of late Shri.Rajappan V.N., who was a 1st grade Draftsman in the Office of the 2nd respondent. Petitioners 2 & 3 claim to be their children. It is stated that Shri.Rajappan expired on 24/08/1999, and what the petitioners now claim is a share in the family pension that is due to the family of the deceased. Although, they are also claiming DCRG i.e. due to him, having regard to the fact that the disbursement of the DCRG is based on the nomination made by the deceased, if the petitioners are entitled, they will have to work out their remedies before appropriate forum. 2. In so far as family pension is concerned, it is seen that the petitioners are filed Ext.P6 representation before the 1st respondent, with copy of the 2nd respondent. Therefore, it is only appropriate that the 2nd respondent considers Ext.P6 representation and pass orders thereon. This shall be done by the 2nd respondent WP(C) No.30368/2009 -2- as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this writ petition. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg