iN THE HIQ‘E COVRT OF JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR (MJ’J vmnxo. 6€Z55§vzouo ,Peutioag ‘Shti Dinash Kumar shrivaaava, Aged 40 years, 3/0 Raja Ram Shrivastava, Adhikari, Durg Rajnan§gaon Gramin Bank, (kam Dondi Block Dondi. Distt.Durg PLP. Pin Cede 491230. Vet 8m . 1 . chairman. Dutg Rajnandgaon Gramm Bank, 9.E .Read, Rajnandgaon . Branch fkna gar , gtq Rajnandgacn Gramin’ Bank» Branch Dondi. Tamil Damn. astt. burg. git petition under Article 226/227 9f the gs @nden ts hutian of India. ‘ Petitioner Resgondenis WRIT PETITION NO.5832 OF ZOOI MM Shri Dinesh Kumar Shrivastava Present : None appears for the petiiioner. None appears for the respondenis. ORDER (Passed on 19‘“ Day of February, 2007) The petitioner, while working as officer, in Durg — Rajnandgaon Gramin Bank at Dondi Branch has been transferred in the same capacity to Dani Rajhara Branch of the said Bank, at his own request, vide order dated 29-2-2000 {P4}, but the same is net being executed despite severai requests made to the respondents. 2. No stay order was granted by this Court in this matter. The transfer order dated 29-2-2000 (P-1)’ must have been executed by the respondents. 3. Be that as it may, with the passage of timeythis petition has become infructuous as period of transfer is not appiicable forever. At this point of time, there is no question toexamine the vaiidity of the i Chairman, Durg Rainandgaon Gramin Bank and another HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILASPUR @ impugned transfer order. However, the responcbnts are at liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in view the public interest and administrative exigency, without insisting on compliance of the impugned transfer order. 4. it is weii settled principle of law that transfer is an incident of service and it is tor the employer to decided as to where a particular v officeriemployee be posted keeping in view public interest as welt as administrative exigency. This Court has limited jurisdiction to interfere in the transfer matter and this Court can interfere oniy in the case of proved male ride, non-competence of authority passing the transfer order and transfer order not being in conformity with the rules and regulations. 5. ln view of the above, this petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. i Sdl- ‘ Satish K. Agnihotri 5‘ Judge