IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 26TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 5TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 WP(C).No. 5164 of 2004(M) ------------------------- PETITIONERS: -------------------- 1. K.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, MANGATTU THOTTATHIL HOUSE, MARUTHAMON BHAGOM, THEKKETHERY P.O., PATTAZHI, KOLLAM. 2. RADHAMANI AMMA, WIFE OF -DO- -DO-. 3. SAJI RANI, RESIDING AT RAJESH BHAVANAM, THEKKETHERY P.O., PATTAZHI, QUILON. 4. CHELLAMMA, RESIDING AT MANGALATHU VEEDU, THEKKETHERY P.O., PATTAZHI, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, QUILON. 2. THE SUB COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, QUILON. 3. T.MOHANAN PILLAI, MOHANA VILASAM, PUTHUKKANNUR, PERUMPUZHA P.O., KUNDARA. BY ADV. SRI.JOBI JOSE KONDODY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. LALTHA THANKAPPAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 5164/2004 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE ORDER NO. A. 8452/03 DT. 10/12/2003. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE ORDER NO. A. 8452/03/K.DIS DT. 20/12/2003. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT AND PETITION IN OS NO. 3/2004 OF THE SUB COURT OF KOTTARAKKARA DT. 3/1/2004. EXT.P4. COPY OF THE QUARRYING PERMIT FOR BRICK CLAY DT. 8/12/2003. EXT.P5. COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BEFORE THE GEOLOGIST BY THE PETITIONERS DT. 6/4/04. EXT.P6. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE TAHSILDAR BY THE RESIDENTS OF PATTAZHI VILLAGE DT. NIL. EXT.P7. COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO. 26/2003-04/DOQ/S2/3242/03 DT. 9/2/2004. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL. True copy tga KURIAN JOSEPH, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 5164 OF 2004 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of November, 2007. J U D G M E N T Petitioners approached this Court aggrieved by Exhibit P2 order passed by the second respondent. The issue pertains to the permission granted to the third respondent for quarrying brick clay. In view of the intervening developments, in case the petitioners have still any grievance left, they may approach the first respondent, in which case, appropriate action in accordance with law with notice to the third respondent will be taken, expeditiously. KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE. smp