]LE y 1^£>-<=^ c, IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WR[T_PETiTION(S) N0. 3(S5b QF^OQ9 PETITIONER: ^-"^ ^-•M^' '.^^y - ^''.^ ^'^€.-- ^>-"" ^' ^ Ardl Kumar Bagde, Aged Aboiit- 39 Years, &/o- Late Shri Rajaram Bagde, Occupation- Service- Range Officer, Ebsted at Range- Makdi, South Kpridagaori, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS RESPQNDENT[S1:1 y State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Forest, D.K.S. : ' Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.) ^2.Additiohal Departinent D.K.S. Raipur(C.G.) Secretary, of Porest, Bhawan, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTrTUTION OF INDIA DETAILS OF THE PETITION 1. PARTIGULARS OF THE PETmONER As inentioned in the causfe title above. i-a:-:: 2. PARTieULARSOFTHERESPONDENTS As mentioned in the cause title above. -oiy igi8HU(i^—-—y ^S^SSSf!-'Si£-i'i "^. B ""S^ </ S—78y ^ *<l*1Wlth*ff«(> 'S^ET '^lPTRra, wntyis, RIMwy. _^l^&2Al..J..^ 1\ vS^V W WM ?f^T 3?I^['gTRfoR' an^Fr Tra^ C^?f^Stt) wiiw ^ift?i sn^T 99 rt7 nl ,+itil Shri Vinay Pandey couns^l for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Singh T{iakur Dy. AG with Shri Shashank Thakur PL for the responcpents/State. Chailenge in this petitic passed by respondent No.2 bj Sargipai. Vide order transferred from Keshkai to Ma order impugned he has been t period of tvvo years. Counsel for the respo! petitioner make a suitable proposition of the State couns^ his agreement. However, he pj *l*{ftrr^*i tTR^ff ^f "fe^ Tf^R5TT i?3ifiw3ii^?r i js to ths order dated 30.6.2009 which the petitionsr who is workin$ as Range Officer has beeji transferred from Makdi, South Kondagaon to Bhopatpattnam F^ange, Bijapur. Contentlon of the coul petitioner a victim of frequent tj a'atsd 29.6.2007 the petitioner division Bastar to Keshksl Depc(t |isei for the petltioner is that the {snsfer. According to him, vide order ^sas transferred from Sargipai forest [{, a p!ace about 150 kms. av/ay from P.9.2008 the petitioner was agasn Bastar and further by the <di, ilnl't- ii^e. ansferred for the third fime within a sdents/State submits that !et the representation to the authorities concerned which wouid be decjided in accordsnce w/lth iaw. To this I, counsei for the petitioner showed ays for an interim protection tii! the representation of the petitiorjier is decided by the authorities concerned. ^f" 1'/' . •*'SS-~i°' s s f s-Hey an^iTrfetw 'cF^y 3TI^T s»ii<i<ft Hi« «>»(t<» TST '4|<1ict<4, gtIlwKo, facll'My _.^M^^^ ^^ 3]1^I1^RfT-C WTOR ^iftct sn^r ttiWict'il-t tlWi-ff'ii'fe(Zt<r«!<41< ^ aiRpi an^i Accordingiy, the petition the petitioner makes a repres^ within a period of 10 days frorfi order, the authorities concernN further period of three weeks fr^m order impugned shaii be kept ir) ^etitioner. ^ disposed of with a direction that if htation to the authorities concerned the date of receipt of copy of thi's shall decide ths same within a fhe daie of its receipt. Tiii then the abeyance so far ss it relates to the Sd/- PritinkerDiwaker Judge AKj