THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 1374 of 2009 Date: 27/1/2010 Between: N.L. Venkat Rao ..... Appellant AND The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad and others. .....Respondents THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO : 1374 of 2009 ORAL JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) This writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned single judge dated 4.10.2009 made in Writ Petition No. 20615 of 2007, whereby and whereunder the learned single judge dismissed the writ petition. The appellant is the writ petitioner. Questioning the action of the respondent-Corporation in trying to demolish the premises of the appellant bearing No. 33-118/3(old) and No. 33-95/24(new) constructed over plot No. 1 (part) 1/A admeasuring 175 sq. yards forming part of Survey No. 207 and 208 of Ramakrishnapum, Malkajgiri Mandal, R.R. District, in pursuance of a notice dated 20.9.2007, the appellant filed the aforementioned writ petition. The learned single judge while taking into account the fact that there is a serious dispute with regard to the extent of land purchased by the mother of the appellant and the one gifted to him by his mother, dismissed the writ petition through the impugned order while leaving it open to the appellant to file a suit to establish his right over the portion of the land said to have been encroached by him. Being aggrieved by the said order, the appellant filed the present appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant reiterated the very same contentions which were urged before the learned single judge. In view of the fact that there is a dispute with regard to the extent of land purchased by the mother of the appellant and the one gifted to him by his mother and in view of the fact that the said dispute is purely civil in nature, the appellant has to approach the competent Civil Court by way of a suit to prove his right and title over the property in question. In the circumstances, we do not find any illegality or irregularity in the order of the learned single judge warranting interference. The writ appeal fails and is accordingly dismissed. N o costs. ___________________ T.MEENA KUMARI,J Date: 27th January, 2010 _________________ SANJAY KUMAR,J pnb