IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.21204 of 2010 MD.IMTEYAZ Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 11.08.2010 Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. In view of the identification of the petitioner by two persons in the T.I.Parade this Court is not persuaded to grant him bail at this stage on the submission that he is in custody since 11.9.2008 and that those who identified him are not appearing to depose. The report at flag ‘A” states that despite summons, bailable warrant of arrest both to the non official and official witnesses including the informant not a single witness had appeared. If the I.O. does not produce the two persons who identified the petitioner in the T.I.Parade for their deposition within a maximum period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order this Court directs the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 2 at Muzaffarpur to initiate summary trial against the I.O. under Section 350 Cr.P.C. for not responding to the summons the conclude the same expeditiously. This application is therefore rejected at this stage with the aforesaid observations. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)