IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICIATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH, AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.113 OF 2008 Between:- Jagarlamudi Subba Rao …Petitioner A n d Jagarlamudi Venkayamma and another …Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.113 OF 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there has been vagueness in the relief prayed for in the E.P and the impugned order also suffers from misconception, as no mention was made in the E.P that it was filed under Order XXI Rule 32 II A CPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner also states that the petitioner intends to file a fresh E.P for proper relief. In view of the said representation, it is considered that no further orders, on merits, are required to be passed in the civil revision petition. The civil revision petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to file a fresh E.P. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 10th February, 2011 Lrkm.