1 srk IN THE HIGH COUT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 224 OF 2009 Vivek Chandanmal Jain & Anr. ... Applicants vs Shri Kausar Ismail Shaikh & Anr. ... Respondents Mrs.Geeta P. Mulekar, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. Ashok B Tejane, Advocate for the Respondents. CORAM: R.S.MOHITE, J DATE: 9th September, 2009. P.C. 1 This is a Revision Application filed by the original defendant No.1 impugning the order dated 4th February, 2009 below Exhibit 35 in Regular Civil Suit No. 384 of 2005 by which the application filed by the defendant No.1 has been rejected. The application filed by defendant No.1 pertains to an objection relating to valuation of the suit property. The issues were framed as preliminary issues and both the sides led evidence. It appears that the defendant No.1 produced in his evidence a xerox copy of the relevant extract from the ready reckoner and this evidence was rejected by the trial court on the ground that the certified copy was not produced. Be that as it may, it would be better 2 if the suit is allowed to proceed. I am not inclined to entertain this Revision Application and observe anything on merits. The applicants will however at liberty to raise issues and contentions which are raised in this Revision Application if and when the suit is finally decreed against them and is challenged. 2 With the above said observations, the Civil Revision Application is disposed off. Judge.