HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISIQN BEN&H CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C»J. HON'BLESHRI SUNiL KUMAR SINHA, J. Writ Appeal No.28 of 20fl9 \- Appeilant Aniruddh Kumar Patanwar S/o Shri Lekhram Patanwar, Aged about 27 years, R/o Plot No.64, Panchmukhl Hanuman Mandir, RK Nagar District Bilaspur(CG) VEMUS Respondents 1 State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Revenue, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur(CG) 2 The Commissioner, Land Record, Raipur (CG) 3 The Collector (Land Record) Bllaspur, Dist - Biiaspur (CG) 4 The Chhattisgarh Board ofProfessional Examinations Through : The Controlier, Raipur(CG) Writ Appeal under Section 2(1} of hte Chhattisaarti Hiah Court fAispeaI to Division Beneht AcfcZOOS Present : None for the appellant. Shri Atok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondents No.1 to3. ORDER (25th January,2&1Q) The fpflowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta,C.J. None for fhe appellant. HJGH COURT OF CHHATTSSGARH AT BILASPUI DIVISIONBENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. KON'BLE SHRi SU.MIL KUF^AR SiNHA, J. WritADDeaLNo.28 of 2009 ADDellant Aniruddh Kumar Patanwar S/o Shri Lekhram Patanwar, Aged about 27 years, R/o Plot No.64, Panchmukhi Hanuman Mandir, RK Nagar Districf iilaspur(CG) VERSUS 1 State of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Department of Revenue, DKS Bhavi/an, Mantralaya, Raipur (CG) 2 The Commissioner, Land Record, Raipur (CG) 3 The Coliector (Land Record) Bilaspur, Dsst - Bilaspur (CG) 4 The Chhattisgarh Board of Professiona! Examinations Through : The Controiler, RaiDur(CG) Appeal under Section 2 (1) of hte Chhattisaarh Hiah Court (Aooesl to Divisfon Benehl Act. 20GS Present : Nonefortheappeliant. Shri Aiok Bakshi, Govt. Advocate for the State/ respondents No.1 to 3. (25th Janua.-y, 2010) The following order of the Court was passed by • ^F.^. None for the appellant. '^'^^» ,,^,,-A "\ fessiEi., iai !, J "k. '^/ s^. y'" ^y' subou -t^ 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appeilant, we are left with no other optlon, but to dismiss the writ appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The writ appea!, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecutlon. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- SUNIL KUMARSINHA Judge 'y