Petitione; Ashwani Kunar Sahu, Sio. Late SM” Umendram Sahu, aged about 46 yeals, Assistant Teacher, ‘ Gavemment Primary School, Bodari, Block Bilha; District B$laspur (CG) Versu§ Respondents 1) State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawgn, Raipur (CG). 2) District Education omcer, Bilaspur (CG). 3) Block Education omcer, Bilha, District Bilaspur (0G). (Writ Petition under Artioie 226 of the Constitution of india.) V SB: Hon’ble Mr. Saosh K. Agnihotfi, J. Present: Shri Kunal Das, counsel for the petitioner. a Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General with Smt. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. __e __ . -w e-“ —--*—-..~~ ORAL ORDER (Passed on 1s“ day of June, zoos) . With consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the mater is heard finally‘ 2) Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher on 26-1 2-1981 (Annexure Pit) on a fixed pay scale of Rs.150l- for a period of two years. After completion of two years probation, the petitioner was granted regular pay scale. He further submits that the issue involved in the case is asto whether the petitioner is entitled to reguiar pay scale with effect from the date of initiai appointment or after completion of probation period. 3) i The issue invoived herein was considered by the Madhya Pradech State Administrative Tribunal, Jabaipur in O.A.No.2745l89 ( Maohukant Yadu and 56 others Vs State of MP. & others), wherein it was held that the similariy situated @ w teachers are entitled to reguiar pay scale w‘ef. the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon‘bie Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon'bie Supreme Court, upholding the decision of the Tribunal to the elfect that the Teachers1Assistant Teachers are entitled to regular pay scale fmm date’of initial appointment. 4) lh view of the above stated submissions made by learned munsel for the parties, the wn‘t petition is disposed of in the same’terms i.e., the petttionervis granted liberty to make a representation, if so advised, to consider the petitioner's case, if he stands on the same footings as per order datedv24-8-1 992 by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabaipur: in 0.A.No. 2745 of 89 (Madhukant Yadu (supra) and subsequently confirmed by order dated 3-1 —1 994 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 68921$3_ and grant relief accordingly. 5) in view of foregoing, the petition is disposed oft No order as to costs. r a Sd/- at Satish K. Agnihotri V Judge ax \V‘ l ‘