IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 4TH MAY 2010 / 14TH VAISAKHA 1932 WP(C).No. 14212 of 2010(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.M.IJAS, THANNICKAL HOUSE, KALOOR, KOCHI. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, N.H.CIRCLE, VYTTILA, KOCHI. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, N.B(B) DIVISION, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K. RAMESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO. 14212 OF 2010 (B) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of May, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that he is engaged in collection of toll from vehicles using NH 47A Link Road connection Willingdon Island from Cochin Bye Pass. It is stated that as per the terms of the agreement, his liability for weekly remittance is only that of Rs.2,65,419/- and that contrary to the same, in Ext.P5, Rs.3,17,670/- has been fixed by the respondents. Aggrieved by such fixation, he filed Ext.P6 before the 2nd respondent and it is complained that even Ext.P6 is not responded. It is with the above grievance, this writ petition is filed. In the light of the facts as above, I feel it is only appropriate that the 2nd respondent to whom Ext.P6 representation has been made, should consider the same in the light of the relevant conditions of the agreement between the parties. In view of the above, I dispose of this writ petition directing the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P6 with notice to the petitioner and as expeditiously as possible at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/