IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.3015 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.05.2011 Janak Raj . . .Petitioner Versus Sh. Atul Seth . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.G.S. Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the revision petition on merits. Hence, revision is dismissed on merits. However, he prays for six months time to vacate the demised premises. He submits that he is in possession of the demised premises since 1983 and requires some time to make some alternative arrangement. In view thereof, petitioner is granted six months time to vacate the demised premises i.e. on or before 05.11.2011 subject to filing of an undertaking to the Rent Controller within 15 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and also clearing all the arrears of rent, if any due. The petitioner shall also keep on paying the rent of the ensuing months. It is made clear that in case of any violation of the undertaking, the petitioner shall be liable under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) MAY 06, 2011 JUDGE Vivek