IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR THURSDAY, THE 27TH JANUARY 2011 / 7TH MAGHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 493 of 2011() -------------------------------------- CRIME NO.855/2010 OF BEKAL POLICE STATION, KASARGOD DISTRICT -------------------------- PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.2 AND 3 ------------------------------------------------------ 1. LATHEEF, S/O. KUNHAPPU, AGED 19 YEARS, PALLARAM, PERIYATTADUKKA, PANAYAL VILLAGE, KASARGOD DISTRICT. 2. MUHAMMED YASIN, S/O. THAHIRA, AGED 19 YEARS, PALLARAM, PERIYATTADUKKAM, PANAYAL VILLAGE, KASARGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.B.ARUNKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BEKAL POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts V. RAMKUMAR, J. ------------------------------------------------- Bail Application No.493 of 2011 --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of January, 2011 ORDER The petitioners, who are accused Nos.2 & 3 in Crime No.855 of 2010 of Bekal Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 392 I.P.C., seek their enlargement on bail. The petitioners were arrested on 17/12/2010. 2. The application was opposed on behalf of the prosecution. 3. Having regard to the gravity of the offence, nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the relative conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the propensities of the petitioners, the sentiments of the near relatives of the victim and the other facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the petitioners are released on bail, they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution B.A.No.493/2011 2 witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. This petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE skj