IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.2094 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision:07.02.2011. Devi Mandir Lala Ghasi Ram Trust ...Petitioner Versus Shri Hari Chand ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Vijay Kumar Jindal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Om Pal Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) This revision petition is at the instance of the landlord, who is aggrieved against the order of the learned Appellate Authority by which the fair rent has been assessed to the tune of `336.66/- per month excluding the house tax etc. from the date of filing of the petition. Admittedly, the demised premises was let out in the year 1970 @ `50/- per month which was increased to `75/- per month w.e.f. 15.01.1980 and then @ `300/- w.e.f. 01.01.1994. On 17.05.2002, the landlord/petitioner filed an application under Section 4 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 [for short “the Act”] for fixation of fair rent. The learned Rent Controller increased the rent by treating the basic rent @ `300/- per month w.e.f. 1970, whereas the learned Appellate Authority has assessed it from the year 1994. After hearing both the learned counsel for the parties, I do not find any error in the order of the learned Appellate Authority because the rent was fixed for the first time @ `300/- per month in the year 1994 which could not be taken to be the rent of the year 1970 which was @ `50/- per month. No other point has been raised. In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the present revision petition and as such, the same is hereby dismissed, however, without any order as to costs. February 07, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE