IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1887 of 2006 RAVI SINGH Versus DEOESHWAR PRASAD SINGH & ORS ----------- 5. 13.5.2009 Heard. I have perused the impugned order which is related to order of substitution by her legal heirs of defendant no.8, namely, Gunna Devi in Title Suit No.142 of 2003 pending before the Court of Sub-Judge- I, Patna. The court has given good reasons for setting aside the abatement on account of the death of the deceased defendant allowing the substitution petition. It was contended that some heirs of defendant no.8 were not brought on record after the death of the said defendant and still the court below was setting aside the abatement and allowing the substitution. The court below has not mentioned anything or discussed that part of the submission or its merit. The petitioner will be free to raise the issue before the court below and that shall be thrashed by the court below when it is raised. The present revision petition is disposed of with the above observation. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )