IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No. M-23772 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: September 19, 2011 Vishal Nayyar and others ... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr.Somesh Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Jasdev Singh Brar, Assistant Adv. General, Punjab for respondent – State. Shri Vishan Sarup Chopra – respondent No.3 with Mr.Yogesh Goel, Advocate. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) By this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners seek quashing of First Information Report (for short 'FIR) No.74 dated September 26th, 2009, registered under Sections 406, 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') in Police Station Division No.4, Ludhiana. While appearing in person with his counsel, complainant – respondent No.3, namely Shri Vishan Sarup Chopra stated at bar that he has compromised the matter with the petitioners with the intervention of the relatives and friends. He has also placed on record his affidavit (Annexure P3) in this regard. He also states that there is no ill-will left. Indeed, the dispute between the parties was of personal nature. In view of this, there should not be any impediment in allowing the parties to compromise the matter. Support to this view can be had from the authority 'Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab' 2008 (2) RCR (Criminal) 429, wherein, Hon'ble Supreme Court has ruled that in such type of cases, where the dispute is of personal nature, Court should ordinarily, accept the compromise. In view of the above, the petition is accepted, FIR No.74 dated September 26th, 2009, registered under Sections 406, 420 read with Section 34 IPC in Police Station Division No.4, Ludhiana and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed. September 19, 2011 ( NAWAB SINGH ) `gian' JUDGE