IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 3RD JULY 2008 / 12TH ASHADHA 1930 CRP.No. 1410 of 2003() ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15/07/2002 IN EA.88/02 IN EP.56/01 IN LAR.10/1989 of SUB COURT,THODUPUZHA .................... REVISION PETITIONER: JUDGMENT DEBTOR: -------------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. R. BINDU RESPONDENT:RESPONDENT:DECREE HOLDER: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MATHAI THOMAS, POOVANIKUNNATHE HOUSE, KANJOR, THODUPUZHA. ADV. SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI FOR R1 SRI.SUDHEESH.A. FOR R1 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J. ------------------------------------------ C.R.P. NO. 1410 OF 2003 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 3rd day of July, 2008 ORDER The State, Judgment Debtor in E.P. 56 of 2001 filed by respondent/claimant decree holder in L.A.R. 10 of 1989 for realization of the enhanced compensation granted by the Land Acquisition Court, filed this revision petition challenging the order of the executing court attaching the property as per order dated 15.7.2002. The grievance of the petitioner is that before directing attachment, objection raised by the petitioner was not considered and the actual amount due was not fixed. The order dated 15.7.2002 does not show that executing court has decided what is the amount due. In such circumstances the order of attachment dated 15.7.2002 is quashed. Executing court is directed to pass a specific order determining the actual amount due to the respondent from Judgment Debtor as per the award granted in L.A.R.10 of 1989 and proceed with the execution petition thereafter. Revision petition is disposed of as above. M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE Okb/-