IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No.817 of 2009 Hemlata Solanki & another ....Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ...Respondents Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate present for the petitioners. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand. Coram: Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Prafulla C. Pant, J. (Oral) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents’ authority to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners. 3. Perusal of the papers on record shows that there are as many as four First Information Reports already lodged against the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that First Information Reports are false and in 2 respect of same cause of action more than one First Information Report is lodged. However, we find that none of the First Information Report are quashed nor resulted in final report after investigation. 4. In the above circumstances, we are not inclined to grant any relief in this petition. The writ petition is dismissed summarily without expressing any opinion as to the merits of the first information reports lodged against the petitioners. 5. (Interim Relief Application No.8213 of 2009 is also rejected). (V.K.Bist, J.) (P.C. Pant, J.) 18.09.2009 Arti 3