1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5412 OF 2008 (Rajendra Kumar Motilalji Chandel vs. State of Maharashtra through the Collector, Amravati & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. JULY 29, 2010. Heard Shri Purohit, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Patel, learned AGP for the respondents. The suit filed by the petitioner is of the year 2008 and there is no temporary injunction operating in his favour till date. Both the courts have recorded finding against the petitioner. In this situation, I find that the interest of justice can be met with by directing the trial Court to decide the Regular Civil Suit No. 86 of 2008 as early as possible and in any case within a period of one year from the date of communication of this order to it. The parties are directed not to create any third party interest in relation to suit property and status quo as on today is granted for said period of one year. The petitioner/ plaintiff shall not take any adjournment before the trial Court on the ground that his advocate is not available. 2 With these directions, writ petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE *GS.