: 1 : Vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.594 OF 2009 Abdul Majid Khan Rajabali Khan ... Applicant V/s. Shahsultan Nizar Dhanai & Ors. ... Respondents Mr.D.B. Sawant for Applicant Mr.N.V. Gangal for Respondent Nos.1 (b), 2 & 3 CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: NOVEMBER 18, 2009 P.C.: 1. The civil revision application challenges the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by both the Courts below whereby the Courts have held that the applicant has been inducted into the suit premises as a sub-tenant. The applicant claims his tenancy through the original tenant of the predecessor of the present landlord. However, no rent receipts have been produced by the applicant before the Court to establish his claim. Moreover, both the Courts have concurrently held that the claim made by the applicant that defendant No.1 in the suit was a fictitious person and therefore, the suit was not tenable had not been established by the applicant i.e. the defendant No.2. The Courts have also concluded that defendant No.2 i.e. the applicant herein, was not a protected tenant and therefore, was liable to evicted. : 2 : 2. In my opinion, there is no error committed by the Courts below and, therefore, I see no reason to interfere with the concurrent findings arrived at by the both the Courts below. 3. Civil Revision Application is rejected. 4. Mr.Sawant appearing for the applicant seeks some time to vacate in the suit premises. The applicant shall accordingly vacate the suit premises on or before 31.5.2010, subject to the usual undertaking to be furnished by the applicant and all adult persons in the family within a week from today.