IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38904 of 2011 Kuntidevi Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 23.11.2011. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Sections 406, 409,420, 467, 468/471 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 63, 65 and 68 of the Copy Right Act. The accusation is that during raid in connection with Arms case it came to the light that one Dipendra Mishra alongwith co- accused Ashok Kumar used to supply duplicate solar lights to various Gram Panchayats without having vat registration. The accusation is that the petitioner being the Panchayat Mukhiya used to direct for supply of solar lights from specific shop. It is submitted by senior counsel for the petitioner that purchase was made in pursuance to direction of the Deputy Development Commissioner whereby purchase was directed to be made from specific shop and purchase was made as per direction of the Deputy Development Commissioner. It is 2 further submitted that considering the similar accusation other Panchayat Mukhiyas have been granted bail, few web copies of the orders have been produced before this Court, let it be kept on record. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 595 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)