1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application No. APPA 365/2011 Hargovind Rambilas Saboo ..Vs.. Pankaj Bhagirath Chandak WITH Criminal Application No. APPA 364/2011 Sau. Tara Hargovind Saboo ..Vs.. Pankaj Bhagirath Chandak Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Courts orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. N. R. Saboo, Advocate for the Applicant None appears on behalf of non-applicant CORAM : U.V. BAKRE, J. DATED : 12.9.2011. 1. Heard Mr. N. R. Saboo, Advocate for the Applicant. 2. Learned Advocate for the non-applicant is absent. Reply has also not been filed by the non-applicant though opportunity was given. 3. In paragraph no. 3 of the application, the applicant has duly explained the reason for delay in filing appeal. The reason appears to be bonafide. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the 2 delay in filing appeal deserves to be condoned. Hence, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned. 4. Leave to file appeal is granted. 5. Appeal shall be registered and be heard on merits. 6. Admit. 7. Issue notice. JUDGE Punde.