1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1226 of 2011 Renuka Sahakari Grahak Sanstha Ambad through its Secretary Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. Respondents Mr. P.V. Mandlik, Senior Counsel holding for Mr. Amol Gandhi, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. N.R. Shaikh, AGP for the respondents CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE A.V. NIRGUDE,JJ. DATE : 8th March, 2011. PER COURT : 1] Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2] By this writ petition, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 6th March, 2010 passed by the District Supply Officer, Jalna, cancelling the fair price shop alloted to the petitioner and the order dated 30th April, 2010, passed by the Deputy Commissioner, (Supply) Aurangabad, dismissing the revision filed by the petitioner against the order dated 6th March, 2010. 3] The petitioner has challenged both the orders, i.e. the order dated 30/4/2010 passed by the Deputy Commissioner ( Supply) and the 2 order dated 6/4/2010 passed by the District Supply Officer, before respondent No.1. In view thereof, we are not inclined to entertain this writ petition and we are satisfied that the following order shall meet the ends of justice. ORDER “Respondent No.1 shall endeavour to decide the revision application filed by the petitioner ( Exhibit L to the writ petition ), as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of this order.” 4] With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. [A.V. NIRGUDE,J] [D.B. BHOSALE,J.] grt/wp