...i'ii^^^^^^^^^^S^^S^i^.iiEi^?"';?^ to3. HiGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH ATBILASPUR W.P. No. 7485 of 2006 Petitioner Bhadal Singh Rathiya, Son of Shri Ujiyar Singh Rattiiya, aged about 42 years, Sarpanch, resident of Village Kaya, Tahasii Gharghoda, Disfrict- Raigarh (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretaiy, Panchayat anci De'.'etepmsnt Department, Govemment of C.G. D. K. S. Bhawan, Rai'pur (C.G.). 2. Coii'ector. Raisarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Sub DMsiona! Officer (Speciiy Officer) Gharghoda, Disirid Raipur 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Gharghoda, District Raigarh (C.G.). 5. Darshan Singh Rathiya, Up- Sarpanch, Son of Chaitan Rathiya, agsd sbouS 35 years, residsnt of Viilage Kaya, Tahasil - Gharghoda, Distrsct- Raigarh (C.G.) WRiT PET!T!0% UNDER ARTiCLES 22S OF THE COSTITUTiON OF JNDiA SB: Hon'bie Mr. Jusfee Satish K. Agnihotri Shri M. K. Sinha, Advocate for the pemoner. Shri Utkareh Vsrma, Deputy Govt. Advocate for ths respondsnts No. 1 Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate for the respondent No.5. ORDER (Passed on friis 18th day of Aprii, 2(K}7) 1. In this petition, the petitioner has impugned the ordsr dated 11.9.20C®(Annsxurs P/11) passsd by the Sub DJvisionai Officer - Specified Officer, Gharghoda, Disfeict - Raigarh and the order dsted 15.12.200S (Annsxurs P/13) passed by the Addffional Coltector, Raigarh, confirmins the order pssssd by the Specified Officer, wthout taking recourse to ths aiternaSvs remedy availabis to him. '^ 2. There are no exceptionaf circumstances. so as to call for the indulgence of this Court in ifs extra ordinary jurisdiction under Articte 226 of the Constitution of India. Under the provisions of Rute 3 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995, an order passed by fr,e Collector is appeiabte te the Director Panchsyat 3. tn view of the above, this petifion is dismissed, as not maintainabte, in view of the statutory remedy availabte to the petitioner. However. the liberty is reserved to the petitioner to taks recourse to the altemative remedy that may be available to him. Thaftur Sd/- SatishK.Ag Judge XI-HC—78 3^^ ^ii'tiivw, ^v'ie, Rirti+iy . (^•.^.C'CnrL3 ^-32-S- •WWff ^^^•••••-••••••--—-••/-"'---"•^ 200 X an^?r iiaw (^f^????) an^r^RiRi'ii'h ?W 3TT^9T sfT^f^i 1- 1 ../ TE<(RR1Hfttf 311^1 CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cft.i N0.7325 OF 2006 DIVISION BENCH: SHRI L.C. BHADOO, HON. SItRI DHIRENDRA 9.. 7. ,JJ Pujrushottam Jaiswal aged about 45 ye^rs, S/o Radbe Shyam Jaiswal, R/|o Vfflage Amleedih, Thaaa Pi<bora, Distt. Mahasamund. Sd TIil <^t'i)i^5ftTT 'Wi^ff ^^^t ^^H ^r ajfgir 3D^r Th|e State of Chliattisgarh, thtough Secretary, Ministiy of Home D^parbaent, Raipiir (C. G.) hior Supermtendent of Police, khasamund (C.G.) OQicer In. charge, Police Station. Pi^hora, Distt. Maliasamiind. CoUector, Mahasaiaund. Th|e Secretary, Muiistiy ofLatoour, D.P<.S. Bhawan, Raipur. U^ion of India, Miiustiy of Home, Nefs? Delhi. St^te of Jaininu and Kaslunir, fh^-ough Secretary, Muiistry of Hcjme, Distt. Jammu (<J aad K)