IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 634 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.4 OF 2000 Mrs. Hirabai Kashinath Patil ... Appellant Versus Mr.Dhanurdhari Narhar Soman and Ors... Respondents Adv. Rajesh Datar for the applicant. Adv. Mr. S.S. Deshmukh for Respondents. CORAM : S.R.SATHE,J. DATED : 04th May,2006 P.C.:- 1. Heard both the Ld. Advocates. It is very clear that prayer made in this application is in fact not subject matter of the present second appeal. During the course of argument it has been submitted by the respondent that suit for eviction is already passed against present applicant and the same is pending in the Trial Court. If it is the grievance of the present applicant that landlord is obstructing her in carrying out repairs of the structure which is admittedly constructed by her, then she may move the Trial Court in the suit which is filed for her eviction. So the application is allowed to be withdrawn as the applicant desires to file separate application in this behalf in the appropriate Court. (S.R. SATHE,J.)