^^i^^£^®^E^^^^^i^^^S,S?P^S^"S.S^;;S5-S^Si@^^sSS^%g3'@^^S®s^^^@eaS^ ^: IN THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF JUDICATURE. CHHATTISTGARH at BILASPUR. WRIT PETITIONNO. l~l-~ls/2006. ^ni F SlFlji PETITIONER \^^..-< ^^ >^^ ^•^ ^<ep^. K. Kanaiya S/o Late Shri. Baragi Aged around 63 years, Ex. BSP employee. Residing at: QR. 86/D Resali Sector, BHILAI - 490001 Tehsil and Dist. : Durg (CG). RESPONDENTS Asst. Solicitor General of India CHHAHISGARH HIGH COURT Mlgh Court Campus, Bllaspur (C.G.) '"^3%''.""'' VERSUS 1. ^" ^ 2. ^' 3. Unionoflndia, Through: The Secretary, Ministry of Steel and Mines, Govemment oflndia, 192- Udyog Bhawan, NEW DELm-110011. The Managing Director (SAIL), Bhilai Steel Plant, Ispat Bhawan, BfflLAl - 490001 District: Durg (CG). The Sr. Manager (Personnel), (Recmitment Section) Bhilai Steel Plant, BHILAI - 490001 District: Durg ("CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDJA FOR THE ISSUANCEOF APPROPRIATE ORDER AND DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARY, MANDAMUS ETC. XI-HC-78 HWrtiaptngi vjw) ^WIrty, wo1'«<is,Rc»my bof \^^1^ 3n$?i^iK-ii<t> ^asf^vseW 'c' '<-. H n BB Gowri '^ •/ g'WKiRof&cl aiASF 18-4-2006 Shri B.P. Rao, Cousnel for th^' Miss Sharmila Singhai, respondent No.1. Shri P. Diwakar, Sr. Ad\l Advocate are also present in Cour(. be supplied to them for resp6ndents| Application for urgent hearind Heard. Learned counsel for the peUtioner may be directed to make| competent authorities and if such be considered and decicted. Not opposed. Having considered and merits of the case, In the opinion| served if a direcBon is gh/en ^ representation raising his respondents afong wtth a copy of representation being filed, the shall decide the same on teown tT<ei possible. It is made clear that if may avail the remedy available und^i With the aforesaid observaticlns Certffied copy as per rules. i^ petitioner. Staftdmg counsel for the Llnion of India/ ^ocate w'rth Shri Anoop Mazumdar, ;our(. Copy of the petiUonwith annexures |No. 2 and 3. is allowed. petfioner submits that for the present Ifte |a representation before the concemed i^presentatlon is made, the same shalt grievan4»s arfr <pi«Inql'iii*t<!)f*|[tesj>^R5R ^•siRlian^ti co|npetent wtyiout expressing any opinion on the of is Court, ends of jusUce will be the petitioner to make a detailed before the comp^ent authority of pefftion and this order and on such authority of the respondents rjerits in accordance with law as early as grievance still remains, the petitioner l^rthelaw. >, tttis petition stands disposed of. Sd/- pakhruddin Judge