1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6541/2010 Chhote Lal Kumahar & Ors. vs. State & Ors. Date of order : 11/5/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri Ram Pratap Saini for the petitioners. ****** The writ petition has been filed by the petitioners to say that since the respondents have got larger number of vacancies in the General/Sanskrit Teacher, which is evident from their letter dated 6.11.09, they should be required to fill in all the posts rather than continuing the petitioners and others on the post of Vidhyarthi Mitra. Learned counsel submitted that the respondents have recently notified only 1054 posts for appointment as Sanskrit Teacher. The letter dated 6.11.09 gives the information to one Yogesh Kumar under the Right to Information Act about the vacancies in the post of General/Sanskrit Teacher Gr.III and also informs that 1087 Vidhyarthi Mitra are presently working against the post of General/Sanskrit Teacher Gr.III. It also informs that 104 posts were filled in by way of promotion in the year 2008 and 336 were 2 filled in by promotion in the year 2009 which means that such number of persons were promoted to Grade II in these years. In any case, it is the discretion of the respondents to periodically hold the selections for appointment on regular basis. No material data has been placed on record to show that respondents have not filled in posts which they notified and therefore this Court by positive direction require the respondents to fill in all the posts. Learned counsel for the petitioners has not been able to show any law on this question to argue that this Court can by a mandamus require the respondents to keep all the posts of direct recruitment filled in. I find no merit in this writ petition, which is accordingly dismissed. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. RS/