IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13013 of 2011 Vandana & others ...Petitioners Versus Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government Haryana, Chandigarh & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.M.L.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** RANJIT SINGH, J. The primary grievance of the counsel is that petitioners are the subsequent purchasers and were necessary party before the Financial Commissioner. As per the counsel, the impugned order has been passed without affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. Counsel further contends that appearance was put, but has not been so recorded in the order nor any opportunity was given to the petitioners to make submissions. If that be so, the petitioners, if so advised, may approach the Financial Commissioner. Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition to approach the Financial Commissioner with this grievance. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. July 25, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE