IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.14944 of 2011 Date of Decision.17.08.2011 Parveen Chawla son of Dawarika Prashad Chawla r/o 9/419 UIT Colony, Bhiwari, Alwar, Rajasthan .....Petitioner Versus Union of India, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, Government of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi through its Secretary and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Deepak Manchanda, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-13), which has been issued on behalf of the petitioner, is considered by respondent Nos.2 to 4 within a particular time. 2. The representation shall be decided by respondent Nos.2 to 4 if the same is presented again along with copy of this order within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 3. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE August 17, 2011 Pankaj*