((-1-)) mst IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.105 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.252 OF 2007 Sunil Tukaram Jadhav and anr. Applicants versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Vikas Shrivastav i/by Sachin Thombare for applicants. Miss A.T.Javeri, APP for the State. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 09th February 2009 PC : 1. Heard advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the State. The learned advocate for the applicant stated that he will supply the correct address of second respondent within a period of three weeks from today by carrying out appropriate amendment to the memorandum of appeal. 2. In view of the averments made in the application and in view of the aforesaid statement, a case for restoration is made out. Accordingly, the application is allowed in ((-2-)) terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c). 3. Time of three weeks is granted to the applicant to carry out the amendment to the cause title of the appeal for supplying the correct address of the second respondent. If amendment is not carried out within the stipulated time, the order of dismissal will stand. (A.S.OKA, J.)