IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARILAL TUESDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2011 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1933 WP(C).No. 32388 of 2011(W) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- JAMALUDHEEN P., S/O.KASMI KOYA, AGED 49, PATTAMBALAM HOUSE, AGATTI ISLAND POST, AGATTI, LAKSHADWEEP NOW WORKING AS OFFICER AT AIR INDIA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.VINOD VALLIKAPPAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------- 1. THE ADMINISTRATOR, UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP, KAVARATTI ISLANDS, LAKSHADWEEP. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP, KAVARTTI ISLANDS, LAKSHADWEEP. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AGTATI ISLAND POLICE STATION, AGATTI ISLAND, LAKSHADWEEP. 4. SHAREEF KHAN, S/O.MHAMMAD KOYA, KUTTILAMADA, MULLIPARA HOUSE, AGATTI ISLAND, LAKSHADWEEP. 5. KAMARUDHIN, S/O.ABDULLAKOYA, KAMAL MALMIYODA, PATTINIYODA, AGATTI ISLAND LAKSHADWEEP. 6. NAJUMUDHIN, S/O.P.KOYA, VALIYA ILLAM, AGATTI ISLAND, LAKSHADWEEP. 7. ABOOBACKER PONDINODA, S/O.MOHAMMAD KOYA, THAIK ALYIAMMADA, AGATTI ISLAND, LAKSHADWEEP. R1 BY SRI.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, SC (LAKSHADWEEP ADMINISTRATION) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VK WP(C).No. 32388 of 2011(W) --------------------------------- APPENDIX ------------ PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS -------------------------- EXT.P1. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 28.11.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL ----------------------------- / TRUE COPY / P.A. TO JUDGE VK PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & K.HARILAL, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C) NO. 32388 OF 2011 ------------------------ Dated this the 13th day of December, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. The learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent, the Administrator Union Territory of Lakshadweep, submitted on the basis of the instructions received, that the complaint submitted by the petitioner was enquired into and the party respondents were summoned. It was revealed in the eqnuiry that an unauthorised fencing was put up by the party respondents. The party respondents were directed to remove that fencing and they readily obliged. The petitioner at that juncture submitted that no crime need be registered against the party respondents. Therefore, the police did not register any crime and at the moment , there is no law and order situation warranting rendition of police protection. If further complaints are received, after holding due enquiry, appropriate action will be taken, so submitted the learned standing counsel. 2. We record all the submissions of the standing counsel W.P.(C) No. 32388 /2011 2 and dispose of this writ petition accordingly. There will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to keep vigil over the petitioner and the party respondents and their places of residence once in a while and to ensure that no untoward incident occurs on account of the dispute between them. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE K.HARILAL, JUDGE. dpk W.P.(C) No. 32388 /2011 3