IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No.14000/2008 Decided on:23.2.2011 _____________________________________________ Anuradha Rani. …Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. ________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Himmat Singh Negi, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ansul Bansal, Addl. A.G. with Mr. P.M. Negi, Dy. A.G. and Mr. R.P. Singh, Asstt. A.G. for respondents No. 1 to 3. Respondent No.4 already ex parte. Mr. Adarsh Vashishta, Advocate for respondent No.5. _____________________________________________________ Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No.5 to the post of Primary Assistant Teacher in Government Primary School, Gahin Lagore. Petitioner and respondent No.5 were interviewed by the duly constituted Selection Committee on 16.5.2006. Petitioner has secured 62 marks 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2 and respondent No.5 has secured 63.01 marks. Suitability of the petitioner and respondent No.5 has been gone into by the duly constituted Selection Committee. No mala fides have been levelled by the petitioner against the Chairman and Members of the Selection Committee. 2. Mr. Himmat Singh Negi has also argued that the result was to be declared within 15 days. The result could be delayed due to number of reasons. It cannot be said that if the merit is not drawn within 15 days, the entire selection process will stand vitiated. 3. Accordingly, in view of the observations made hereinabove, there is no merit in the petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge 23.2.2011 *awasthi*