<if^ \"^~ I-' ^!^ HIGH COURT OP GHHATnSGAKH. BIL^SPUR W.P.(81No.736lof 2Q07 PETITIONER RE8PONDBNTS 2 3 4. Anaad Plasad Paikara, age about 47 years, Assistant Teacher, s/o Shri Bhikham Sai Janpad Plimaiy Sehool Sujibahar, Block Kanshatiel, District Jashpur(CG) Maheshwar Ram. Yadav age about 39 year, Assistant Teacher, s/o Shn Subraa Ram Govt. Primaiy School Vaiununda Block Farsabahar, District Jashpur(CG) Versus State Govemment of Chhattisgarh, Ttuough Seeretaiy, Tnbal Wetfare Department & Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawaa, Distnct Raipur (C.G.) Distnct Education Qfficer, Jashpiir, DistriGtJashpur(CG) Bktdk Education ^ OflBcer, Kaashabel/Parsabahar; District Jashpur(CG) Treasuiy, Account & Pension, Jashpur, DistrictJashpur(CG) WRIT PBTITION UNDERARTICLE 22fi OF THE CONSTITUTIOM OFINDIA Appearance; . Shri Somkant Verma, coiuisel for the petitioners. Shri Ptadeep Singh, Lawyer for the Statc on advaace copy. ORALOKDBS. (12.12.2007) SUMIL KUMARSINHA. J Heard on adimssion. Leamed counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have p^sed D.Ed. exainiaation on fheir own expenses; fherefore, they are entifled to receive two advaace increHients accordiug to cn-cularsdated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.199&. He also subuuts fh&t iii maay identical inatters, fhe petitions have becu allowed ia femis pf the order passed iu fhe case bf Yashwant WP(S)No.7361/2007 fff Kumw Bheirad.wal Vs. JMunterftxd Cprpwnrtian, flara and another f2006 ffD JlfiUR-CG 96?. He submits fhat the case ofthe petitioners is squarely covered by fhe said judgiuent. This legal position is not disputed by fhe leamed counsel for fhe State. However, he submlts fhat the oider may be passed in tenas ofthe said judgment,but it shall besubjected to veri&cation regardiag petitioners' such qualification. Accordingly, fhis writ petition is allowed in terms ofthe order passed in case of Ydshwcm.i Kumccr Bharadwaj Vs. Municipdt Co/rporation, Durg and another (Supra) subject to veri&cation ofthe facts as to whether the petitioners had acquired D.Ed. Examiaation Certificateson fheir own expenses as per circulars dated 24.12.1998 aad 01.03.1999 andfurtherwhethertheyhave been paid two advaace iacreiaents or not. The petition stends GseSy disposed of No order as to costs. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sisiha Judge A •^-f>\' Sunita (^r.