IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36086 of 2008 1. KAPILDEO RAI S/ORAM JIVAN RAI 2. SURENDRA RAI @ RAM AYODHYA RAI S/O RAM NARAYAN RAI 3. NARAD PRASAD S/O RAJ BANSI PRASAD ( ALL ARE R/O VILL. UJJAIN LOHIAR, P. S. HARSIDHI DIST. EAST CHAMPARAN. 4. KEDAR SINGH S/O RAM ASHRAY SINGH, R/O VILL. JHAKHARA P. S GOVINDGANJ, 5. SURYA PRASAD S/O DHORHA PRASAD R/O VILL. MATH LOHIYAR , P. S,HARSIDHI 6. JAI PRAKASH KUMAR S/O BABU LAL SINGH R/O VILL. ARERAJ REGISTRY OFFICE P. S. GOVIND GANJ.DIST. EAST CHAMPARAN. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- For the petitioners: Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Choubey Jawahar, A.P.P. 02 01.10.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint case No. 1780 of 2006 registered under sections 420,423,467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are purchasers of land in question, petitioner Nos. 4 and 5 are witnesses over the sale deed and petitioner No.6 is the deed writer. It is submitted that the petitioner Nos.1 to 3 are bonafide purchasers as the complainant sold the land and they have purchased. Now, after the transaction the complainant says that he was intending to sale different piece of land. Learned counsel for petitioners further submits that complainant’s remedy is before Civil Court. Learned counsel for the State submits that as per allegation in the complaint petition petitioners have deceived the complainant and got the sale deed of different lands which is costlier. - 2 - In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, namely, Kapildeo Rai, Surendra Rai @ Ram Ayodhya Rai, Narad Prasad, Kedar Singh, Surya Prasad and Jai Prakash Kumar, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of this order be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with complaint case no. 1780 of 2006 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Sym ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan,J.)