IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-12856 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.7.2011 Rajbir Singh ..Petitioner. Vs. State of Punjab ..Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present : Mr. Amandeep Singh Saini, Advocate for Mr. P.S.Jammu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Rajesh Bindal, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the petitioner was initially released on regular bail, however, on account of absence from the Court, his bail bonds were cancelled and warrants were issued for his arrest. In terms of the order passed by this court on 29.4.2011, the petitioner has already appeared before the Court below and furnished his bail bonds. He further submitted that the matter in dispute has been compromised between the parties and even a quashing petition has already been filed in which both the parties were directed to appear before the Court below and get the statements recorded. Needful has already been done. Learned counsel for the State did not dispute the fact that the petitioner had appeared before the Court below on 8.7.2011 and furnished his bail bonds. Considering the aforesaid facts, interim order passed by this Court on 29.4.2011 is made absolute. The petition stands disposed of. ( Rajesh Bindal ) 29.7.2011 Judge Meenu