__ 3 -_ W Ii’ IN THE MADHYA PR§§ESH ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BENCH RAIPU“ ( o.A. No. OF 1999 3'; ‘ APPLICANT Smt. S.B. Ratre wyo Shri B.D. ’ ’ Ratxe aged about years, Assistant Grade II Office of Pariyojana Adhikari, Mahila ana Bal Vikas Pariyojana Abhanpur Distt. Raipur VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. Government of Madhya Pradesh throu- J gh Secretaxy Mahila Avam Bal Vikas Department Mantralaya Bhopal 2. The Conmdsnor Mahila Bel Vikas Maéhya Pradesh Bhopal. 3. District Mahila Avam Bal Vikas Adhikari Distt. Raipur. 4. Pariyojna Adhikari integrated child Development Project Abhanpuz Distt. Raipur. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ACT 1985. DETAILS OE APPLICATION "‘ WW, ai ‘lm‘ v2, \W ‘u ‘ WEa‘iw wg. “MMLO; (”{— W20 t { i IV / u TJJmene mQTW (W) anéelésrW wamiaamias wmmanézr mm#wm $Wané21 SB : Hon’ble shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. 19-02-2010 When the matter was called for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner and the matter was passed over. Even in the second round, none a appears for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, P.L. for the Taking into consideration the nature of controversy invoived in the petition, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution, However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to revive the petition, if the cause of action stiii survives for consideration. A copy of the order be sent to the petitioner forthwith. Manindra Mohan ’Shrivastava