IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11104 of 2009 AJIT KUMAR TIWARI Versus HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORP.LTD.& ----------- 2 2.9.2009 The learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the Deputy General Manager, L.P.G., Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Kolkatta, W.B., as a party respondent no.4. In the instant writ application the petitioner prays for issuing afresh separate D.O. letter for interview by canceling the interview held on 29.7.2009 in response to the advertisement dated 19.1.2009. The petitioner states that in his bio-data he has mentioned this address as ‘ Servo Stockiest (Automotive), Tulsi Nagar, Jail Road, Tilka Manjhi, Bhagalpur.He mentioned his permanent address as ‘ Vijay Nagar, Banka, Bihar, Pin Code – 813102’. Despite fulfilling all criterias, the petitioner did not receive any interview letter. Subsequently the petitioner learnt that interview letter was sent to his permanent address and not on his correspondence address. The petitioner had mentioned the address on which correspondence should be made in his Biodata. The petitioner then represented to the Senior Manager L.P.G., Patna with respect to the aforesaid grievance. Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Singh, counsel for the respondent no.3, states that the communication for interview was sent within time on the address mentioned in the application form itself as contained in para 9. As such communication of interview was sent properly. 2 After hearing the learned counsel for the parties I direct the Senior Regional Manager, respondent no.2, to dispose of the issue in accordance with law. In order to facilitate such decision the petitioner would file a representation before him with a copy of this order. Respondent no.2 is expected to dispose of the same within two weeks from the date of receipt of the same. The decision of respondent no.2 would govern the process of allotment of dealership. With the aforesaid direction this writ application is disposed of. Anilkrsinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)