e^fn r RFHCH n'.S-s'^.^'-:. QLiiitsaa <n> IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR. WRIT PETITION |S) N0. '7 7 sg OF 2007 PETITIONER "^^ %-< .^.. •-'''' RESPONDENTS ."^ _ r^^^ ^ / -^^ ^^° 0-:^ 2. Bagar Sai Sonwani S/o Shri Sukhdev Sonwani, aged about 51 years, Occupation- Revenue Inspector Ambikapur Circle no. 01, District Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S., Bhawan Raipur C.G. The Cominissioner Land Record RaipurfC.G.) -^- WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^s^ HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH: BILASPUR Singte Bench; Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J, W. P. (5} No. 778 of 2007 Petitioner ; Bagar Sai Sonwani Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh daid others Subhash Present: Mr. Rakesh Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Pcaiel Lawyer for tiie State/ respondents. OR&ER (Passed on 9th &ay of February, 2007) 1. Learned counse! appearing for -the respondents/State submits that if, a representation seeking redresail of his grievcnce, as sou9ht for^ in this petition, is made before the competent culhorities, the competent aulhorities nwy consider -the same within a period of two mon-ths from the date of receipt of the representation, in accordonce with Saw, on its own merit. 2. In view of the above Statement made by tearned counsel oppearing for the respondents/State, learned counset appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing survives in this matter. TTie writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. . __——- SattshK.Agn»-hotn Judge 3.