IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Cr.Misc. NO. M 663 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION 1.4.2009 Zile Singh ......PETITIONER VERSUS State of Haryana. ......RESPONDENTS PRESENT: Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate Mr. Rattan Brar, AAG, Hry Mr. Rajesh Malik, Advocate M.M.S.BEDI,J. The petitioner seeks the concession of regular bail in a case registered at the instance of Dilbagh Singh alleging that his father Amar Nath was injured and killed by the petitioner and his two sons. So far as the petitioner is concerned, the allegation against him is that he has a given blow with a dranti on the head of complainant's father. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on account of the enmity, which is reflected from the averments in the FIR. It has also been contended that the petitioner is an old man of 74 years. In view of the fact that only one witness stands examined and the petitioner having been attributed a specific injury on the person of the deceased, he cannot be granted the concession of bail at this stage. Dismissed at this stage. April 1 ,2009 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE