IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH FEBRUARY 2009 / 23RD MAGHA 1930 WP(C).No. 251 of 2009(E) ------------------------ PETITIONER(S): --------------- SUCHITRA, AGED 18 YEARS, D/O.RADHAKRISHNAN, ADAMKAVIL HOUSE, MINALUR VILLAGE, TALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHOSH (PODUVAL) RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. SECRETARY, MUNDATHIL KODE GRAMA PANCHAYAT, MUNDATHIL KODE.P.O, THRISSUR. 2. A.R.SUNDARAN, S/O.RAMAN, ADATTU PARAMBIL HOUSE, AMBALAPURAM DESOM, PERINGANDOOR VILLAGE, TALAPPILLY, THRISSUR. ADV. SRI.P.RADHAKRISHNAN (1) FOR R2 ADV.D.KRISHNAPRASAD, FOR R1 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/02/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.251 of 2009 ================== Dated this the 12th day of February, 2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the 1st respondent in not passing orders as directed in Ext.P3 order of the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions in respect of a construction by the 2nd respondent herein. The allegation of the petitioner is that despite the order and a stop memo issued by the Panchayat, the 2nd respondent is continuing the construction. The 2nd respondent submits that he has not continued the construction. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions: The 1st respondent shall pass final orders as contemplated in Exts.P2 and P3 orders, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Till orders are thus passed, the 2nd respondent shall not make any further construction in respect of the subject matter. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2