IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-A 251-MA of 2011 Date of decision: 17.5.2011 Union Territory, Chandigarh …..Appellant vs. Parveen Kumar …..Respondent CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: - Mr. P.K.Khindria, Add. Public Prosecutor HEMANT GUPTA, J CRM No. 13455 of 2011 Keeping in view the averments made in the application, delay of 168 days in filing the appeal is condoned, subject to all just exceptions. CRM-A No. 251-MA of 2011 State is in appeal aggrieved against the order passed by learned first Appellate Court, acquitting the accused for an offence under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. It is the case of the prosecution that the accused forged the withdrawal vouchers to withdraw the amount of Rs. 10,000/- from the Bank account of the complainant-Fateh Singh. Learned first Appellate Court has found that though the writing on the vouchers is in the hands of the accused, but there was no evidence that the signatures are in the CRM-A 251-MA of 2011 hands of the accused or that they are not in the hands of the complainant. In view of the said fact, the findings recorded by learned first Appellate Court cannot be said to be suffering from any perversity, which may warrant any interference in the appeal against acquittal. Dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 17.5.2011 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) preeti JUDGE 2