1 mpt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.787 of 2004 Mrs.Colamai Pallonji Mistry .. Plaintiff versus Mrs.Roshni Hosi Tata & ors. .. Defendants ... Mr. S.G. Walam for the plaintiff. Ms.Jyoti Chavan for defendant nos.1 and 2. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED :7th July 2009 P.C:- 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that the plaintiff does not wish to proceed the suit against defendant no.3. The suit against defendant no.3 is dismissed with costs. 3. Learned counsel for the plaintiff and defendant nos.1 and 2 state that the parties have agreed to settle the dispute and tender the consent terms. They also tender the Power of Attorneys given by the plaintiff to her son and given by defendant no.2 to the defendant no.1. The consent terms and Power of Attorneys are taken on record and respectively marked "X", "Y" and "Z". 2 4. The Constituted Attorney of the plaintiff is personally present in the court and is identified by the advocate for the plaintiff. He admits his signature and contents. 5. The defendant no.1 is personally present in the court and is identified by her advocate. She admits her signature made for self and as the Constituted Attorney of defendant no.2 and the contents thereof. 6. Consent terms also bear the signature of the respective advocates of the plaintiff and defendant nos.1 and 2. 7. Consent terms and Power of Attorneys are taken on record. 8. There shall be order in terms of consent terms except paragraph no.7 which is modified as follows: Suit against defendant no.3 is dismissed with costs. Plaintiff and defendant nos.1 and 2 shall be their own costs 9. Original Power of Attorneys be returned to the parties on production of certified copies thereof. (D.G. KARNIK, J)