IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 15.02.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.42380 of 2006 A.Jeya Bharathi ... Petitioner -Vs.- 1.The Assistant Director, Employment Exchange, Anna Nagar, Chennai – 600 040. 2. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Building, Chennai – 3. .. Respondents Prayer: Original Application No.5893 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal praying to direct the first respondent to sponsor the name of the petitioner for the post of Secondary Grade Teacher (Physical Training) to the second respondent and consequently direct the second respondent to consider the same of the petitioner for the post of Secondary Grade Teacher (Physical Training) in the Corporation School at Chennai under the Schedule Caste (Adhi Dravidar) quota for the year 1999. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. For petitioner : Mr.Vijayakumar For R – 1 : Mr.B.Vijay, Government Advocate For R - 2 : Mr.C.Kalaiselvan https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ O R D E R Original Application No.5893 of 1999 was filed before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal praying to direct the first respondent to sponsor the name of the applicant for the post of Secondary Grade Teacher (Physical Training) to the second respondent and consequently direct the second respondent to consider the same of the petitioner for the post of Secondary Grade Teacher (Physical Training) in the Corporation School at Chennai under the Schedule Caste (Adhi Dravidar) quota for the year 1999. Since the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal was abolished, the O.A. was received by transfer and numbered as Writ Petition. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has made a representation on 7.9.1999 to the first respondent for considering her claim for appointment to the post of Secondary Grade Teacher (Physical Training). At this point of time, the learned counsel for the petitioner is not able to state as to whether the relief sought for by the petitioner has been granted. If the grievance of the petitioner subsists as on today, the petitioner is entitled to make further representation to the appropriate authority as well as the Employment Exchange to consider her claim on merits. Such representation shall be considered and disposed of on merits within a reasonable period of time preferably, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/ Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar vsm To 1. The Assistant Director Employment Exchange Anna Nagar Chennai – 600 040. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Rippon Building Chennai – 3. +1cc to Mr.C.Kalaiselvan, Advocate Sr 9801 +1cc to Mr.B.Vijay Govt. Advocate Sr 10127 TRM(CO) km/8.3. W.P.No.42380 of 2006 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/