:1: :1: :1: HIGH HIGH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1001 OF 2005. IN CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 300 OF 2001. APPEAL NO. 300 OF 2001. APPEAL NO. 300 OF 2001. Smt. Noorjahan @ Salma Momammed Shaikh. ..Applicant. Versus. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. --- Mr.N.N.Gavankar i/b Arfan Sait for the applicant. Mr. S.R.Shinde, APP for the respondent - State. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: V.M.KANADE,J. V.M.KANADE,J. V.M.KANADE,J. DATE: DATE: DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2005. FEBRUARY 21, 2005. FEBRUARY 21, 2005. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State. This application is for furnishing another surety in place of the surety which has already been furnished by the applicant. 2. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b). Applicant to furnish another surety within a period of eight weeks. After furnishing the fresh surety, the earlier surety shall stand discharged from the date on which the second surety is furnished. 3. Application is disposed off. (V.M.KANADE, (V.M.KANADE, (V.M.KANADE, J.) J.) J.)