IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Contempt Petition No. 240 of 2003 Churha. …… Petitioner. Versus Mr. Jai Pal Singh and others. … Respondents. Mr. Sharad Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. J.S.Bisht, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate, for the respondent nos. 2 and 4. Date July 16, 2010. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed to punish the respondents for deliberate and intentional flouting the order dated 25-10-2002 passed in Writ Petition No. 811 of 2002 (M/S) whereby the order of status quo was passed. The contempt petition has been filed on the ground that the Pradhan of the village has written a letter to the District Magistrate Haridwar to evict the persons, who are unauthorisedly occupying the land of plot No. 157/3, 157/4 and 157/5, which is Harijan Abadi and plot nos. 157/5 and 157/6, (Ambedkar Park) and plot no. 157/9 and 156/2 as well as 201/3 (manure pits) of village Khajuri as mentioned in the application (Annexure No.3). By a perusal of the application moved by the Pradhan of the village, it reveals that name of the petitioner does not find place in the application and even the dispute involved in Writ Petition is regarding plot No. 157/1. There is no question of flouting any order of this Court by the respondents. In the facts and circumstances emerging from the record, the contempt petition has no merit. The contempt petition is dismissed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. ( B.S.Verma, J. ) RCP