1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.163 of 2007 Habibunnissa W/o. Salauddin Inamdar Through General Power of attorney Naim Salauddin Inamdar PETITIONER VERSUS Banekhan Papakhan Pathan RESPONDENT Mr.S.T.Shelke, advocate for petitioner, Mr.A.S.Bajaj, advocate for respondent (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 22/06/2009 PER COURT : 1. The applicant/original plaintiff had filed suit RCS No.126/1988 against the respondent, who is the defendant before the Trial Court. By the judgment and decree dated 29/06/1993, the said suit was dismissed by the Trial Court. Being aggrieved, Reg.Civil Appeal No. 330/2000 was filed by the present petitioner, which was also came to be dismissed on 05/07/2005. Perused the judgments of the Courts below. In the Trial Court, the suit was filed for eviction of the respondent defendant on the ground of defaulter u/s.12(3) of The Bombay Rent Act as well as for the bonafide requirement u/s.13(1)(g) of The Bombay Rent Act. The only ground which was challenged 2 whether an act of the respondent comes as the contravention of the term of tenancy u/s.108 clause (O) of the Transfer of Property Act as defined u/s. 13(1)(a) of The Rent Act which was also rejected by the Appellate Court. Considering the submissions across the bar and on perusal of the judgments of both the Courts below, I do not find any substantive question of Law is involved in this revision application which require to be considered by this Court in its revisional jurisdiction. In the premise, at the stage of admission itself, the revision application to be rejected, hence rejected. No order as to costs. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/cra163-07