THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Contempt Case No :813 of 2010 Date: 12.7.2010 Between: Mr. Dasari Nagendra Babu ..... PETITIONER AND State of A.P. rep.by the Secretary, Home Department and others. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner : Kota Srinivasa Kumar Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. for Home The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO :813 of 2010 ORDER: This contempt case is filed alleging willful disobedience of order dated 9.3.2010 in W.P. No.8743 of 2009. The petitioner herein filed W.P. No. 8743 of 2009 for a mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents in investigating Crime No. 36 of 2009 of Begumpet Police Station and seizing the accounts registers, ledgers, hard discs of computer etc., as illegal. This Court disposed of the said writ petition, by order dated 9.3.2010 with the direction to respondents 5 and 6 therein to complete the investigation and file appropriate charge sheet/report before the jurisdictional Magistrate within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Alleging that the said order has not been complied with and that charge sheet/final report has not been filed so far, the present contempt case is filed. When this case came up on 28.6.2010, this Court adjourned the case on finding that the respondents are unable to furnish the S.R. number of the final report, which was stated to have been filed on 10.5.2010 before the Jurisdictional Magistrate. Today, the learned counsel representing the Government Pleader for Home placed before the Court a bunch of papers containing the material, including a copy of the notice said to have been given to the petitioner- complainant on 8.5.2010 stating therein that the complaint was reported before the Jurisdictional Magistrate as civil in nature. A copy of the final report dt. 10.5.2010 is also furnished along with the papers. In the covering letter addressed by the Inspector of Police, Begumpet Police Station to the Government Pleader for Home, he has mentioned that the XI Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court has allotted S.R No. 5794 to the final report. From the facts noted above, I am satisfied that the respondents have filed the final report as directed by this Court after notice to the petitioner- complainant. In view of the above, I do not find any reason to proceed against the respondents got contempt. The contempt case is accordingly dismissed. __________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY,J DATE: 12th July, 2010 pnb