IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2289 of 2007 Suresh Yadav, son of Sheobarat Yadav, resident of Village-Chhatiyana, P.S. Makhdumpur,District: Jehanabad ………………………………………Petitioner. Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board through its Chairman, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna. 2. The Secretary, B.S.E.B., Vidut Bhawan Patna. 3. The Director of Accounts,Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna. 4. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Magadh Electiricity Supply Area, Gaya. 5. The Deputy Director of Accounts, Magadh Electric Supply Area, Gaya. 6. The Superintendening Engineer, Electric Circle,Gaya. 7. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Jehanabad. 8. The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electric Sub Division Makhdumpur, Jehanabad. ………………Respondents. ----------- 3. 20. 04. 09. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Respondent Board. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he proposes to file representation within two weeks along with certified copy of present order before Respondent No. 2 for redressal of his grievance. In case such representation is filed before Respondent No.2, he shall consider the same and disposed of by a reasoned order in accordance with law with regards to claim of the petitioner as raised in the representation. Upon such consideration in case representation is disposed - 2 - of in favour of the petitioner, Respondent No. 2 shall simultaneously issue necessary order in connection with unpaid claims expeditiously within four months on receipt of such representation. With the aforesaid observations/direction the writ application is disposed of . m.p. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)