:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 540 OF 1995 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 540 OF 1995 SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 540 OF 1995 IN IN IN SUIT NO. 2529 OF 1995 SUIT NO. 2529 OF 1995 SUIT NO. 2529 OF 1995 Ms. Aarti Drugs Ltd .....Plffs. Plffs. Plffs. vs. M/s. Uttar Pradesh Drugs and Pharmaceuticals co.Ltd .....Defnds. Defnds. Defnds. Mrs. Anjali Helekar for the plffs. Aslam Shaikh i/b. S.A. Shaikh for defnds. CORAM: S.U. KAMDAR, J. DATE : 20th September, 2005. P.C. :. 1. Learned cousnel for the plaintiffs states that original documents are not on record and seem to be misplaced. In that view of the matter the matter requires to be considered on secondary evidence. :2: This will require trial. In that view of the matter unconditional leave to defend is granted. suit is transferred to the list of Commercial Causes. Written statement or points of defence to be filed four weeks from today. Affidavits, list of documents to be filed within four weeks thereafter. Inspection within four weeks thereafter. Suit to be on board of the learned Judge taking Commercial Causes. sd/- ************