IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH JANUARY 2008 / 10TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 3524 of 2008(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------- IBRAHIM, AGED 35 YEARS, SON OF MUHAMMAD, MANGALETHU HOUSE, PUTHUPPADY KARA, KOTHAMANGALAM. BY ADV. SRI.N.ANILKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIATE, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER (RDO), MUVATTUPUZHA. 4. PROF. BABY M.VARGHESE, MANNARAPRAYIL HOUSE, SIFIYA COLLEGE TRUST, NEAR JAWAHAR THEATER, KOTHAMANGALAM. 5. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTHAMANGALAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.I.V. PRAMOD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------- W.P(C) No. 3524 OF 2008 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT Petitioner alleges that the 4th respondent is filling a paddy field against the Kerala Land Utilisation order. It is stated that the petitioner had made Exts.P1 & P2 complaints. According to him, Ext.P2 complaint has been forwarded by the District Collector to the 5th respondent for necessary action. It is stated that even thereafter nothing has been done. It is in this background, this Writ Petition has been filed. 2. If as stated by the petitioner, Exts.P1 and P2 have been received by the respondents, necessary action shall be taken. However, any such action shall be taken only with notice to the 4th respondent. I clarify that I have not pronounced on the correctness or otherwise of the claim made by the writ petitioner. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE btt WPC No. 2 WPC No. 3