IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10382 of 2009 1. PRADEEP RAI, SON OF MADAN PRASAD RAI 2. KALSHIYA DEVI, WIFE OF MADAN PRASAD RAI 3. MADAN RAI @ MADAN PRASAD RAI, SON OF LATE BHRAMDEO RAI 4. USHA DEVI, WIFE OF PRADUMAN RAI 5. ARUN RAI, SON OF MADAN PRASAD RAI 6. VISUNDEV RAI, SON OF SOTI RAI. 7. SHANKAR RAI, SON OF LATE HARDEO RAI ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE – GOSHPUR, P.S. JANDAHA, DISTT. VAISHALI ------- PETITIONERS. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. CHHORIYA DEVI, WIFE OF RAM EQBAL RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KAHAGPUR, P.S. DESHRI, DISTT. VAISHALI ----------- OPPOSITE PARTIES. 2. 15.09.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioners have sought quashing of the order of cognizance dated 22.9.2006 passed by Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali, at Hajipur, in Trial No. 2437 of 2008 arising out of Jandaha P.S. Case No. 66 of 2004 on the ground that the other co-accused persons who were put on trial have been acquitted. In my view this can be no reason for quashing the order of cognizance since each case is dependent upon the evidence collected in that particular case. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)