IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 23249 of 2011 Date of Decision: 14.12.2011. Surinder Pal Singh & another --Petitioners Versus Punjab Mandi Board & others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:- Mr. R.K. Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. *** TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA.J (ORAL) The conditions of service of the petitioners are governed by the Punjab Marketing Committee Class-III Service Rules, 1989. In terms of Rule 6 of the aforesaid rules the appointing authority of the various posts including post of Auction Recorder and Mandi Supervisor is the Marketing Committee itself. It is contended that the Punjab Mandi Board would have no jurisdiction to transfer the Mandi Supervisor-cum-Fee Collector from one Market Committee to another. Accordingly, directions are being sought in the present petition to repatriate respondent no.5, Mandi Supervisor from Marketing Committee Tanda, Distt. Hoshiarpur to his parent Marketing Committee i.e. Dera Baba Nanak, Distt. Gurdaspur. Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to Annexure P-4, which is a request dated 20.7.2011 made by respondent no.5 himself to be transferred back to his parent Marketing Committee i.e. Dera Baba Nanak Marketing Committee, Distt. Gurdaspur. Petitioners have raised all their contentions in a representation (Annexure P- 2) addressed to respondent no.2. CWP No. 23249 of 2011 -2- Accordingly, present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to take a final decision on the representation (Annexure P- 2) made by the petitioners, referred to above, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA) JUDGE 14.12.2011. lucky