THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR W.P.No.28564 OF 2011 ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent- Corporation. The removal order was passed against the petitioner on the ground of misconduct, which was held proved in the domestic enquiry. Against the said order of the 4th respondent, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the 2nd respondent, which also ended in dismissal. Questioning the said order, this writ petition is filed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already filed a review before the 2nd respondent on 29-3-2011 and according to him, the petitioner has a good case in the said review application, but the 2nd respondent is not disposing of the said review. Hence, he was constrained to approach this Court. He further submits that if a direction to dispose of the review application is granted, the petitioner would be satisfied, which course is also acceptable to the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on the review application filed by the petitioner on 29-3-2011 in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. __________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR,J rkk Dated: 21-10-2011