IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33246 of 2011 Sonu Pathak @ Atal Bihari Pathak Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 28.09.2011. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of the petition. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 394 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that some accused persons hired the vehicle and on the way they made assault to the driver and snatched his Mobile, cash, golden ring and silver chain. Subsequently, one Deepak Pathak was caught driving the vehicle who disclosed the name of the petitioner. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner’s father deposed against the uncle of Deepak Pathak earlier as a result of the said enmity, Deepak Pathak has named the petitioner and he was not apprehended from place of occurrence. Moreover, the statement has been made in paragraph no. 10 2 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Simari P.S. Case No. 123 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Buxar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)