IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 27595 of 2005 BETWEEN: 1 L. Jaya Reddy, S/o. Late Raghava Reddy, R/o.2-95/9/4, Masthan Nagar, Road No.48 Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. 2 B. Srikrishna S/o. B. Kutumba Rao, Prasanth Nagar Colony, Miyapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Station House Officer, P.S. Chanda Nagar, Ranga Reddy District. 2 The State House Officer, P.S., Rajendra Nagar Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Station House Officer, P.S. Madapur, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in calling the writ petitioners to the respondent Police Stations in respect of the Plot No.114 in Sy.Nos.74 and 75 part to extent of 300 Sq. Yards situate at Gopannapalli Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District purchased by the petitioners under Registered Document No.9565/2005 dt.30.6.2005 as illegal, improper, arbitrary unreasonable and further direct the respondents not to call and harass the petitioners in respect of the above said transaction and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.V.SREE RANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: Petitioners seek a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in calling them the respondent Police Stations in respect of the Plot No.114 in Sy.Nos.74 and 75 part to extent of 300 sq. yards situate at Gopannapalli Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District purchased by them under Registered Document No.9565/2005 dt.30.6.2005 as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Counter has been filed stating that the life and liberty of the petitioners has never been interfered with and the petitioners were never called to the police station as alleged by them. It is stated that as the dispute of the petitioners being civil in nature, the respondents are no way concerned with it. 3. In view of the categorical denial of all the allegations of the petitioners I am of the opinion that no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J August 18 2008 DSK