mst FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.1602 OF 1999 Andhra Bank Plaintiff versus Praveen Jha Defendant Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr.O.A.Das for plaintiff. None for the defendant. CORAM : S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 5th May 2011 PC : 1. Mr.Das appearing for the plaintiff informs the Court that though the suit is shown under the caption "for ex-parte decree", the writ of summons is not served on the defendant since last 12 years. He submits that though he had obtained a chamber order, the plaintiffs have not come forward to instruct him since last eight years. 2. In view thereof, the question of passing an ex-parte decree in the matter does not arise. It is also clear that the plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the suit. The suit is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.)