1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6228/2009 Lal Singh vs The Asstt. Director Social Welfare Department, Udaipur DATE OF ORDER: 6.7.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Rakesh Arora, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner's grievance is that he was retrenched from services violating the provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. However, he submitted the claim before the labour court but the labour court instead of reinstating him, granted compensation of Rs.25,000/- only. It is also submitted that even the compensation awarded is too low. I considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. As per the petitioner's own case, he was appointed on 18th Oct., 1996 and was retrenched from services on 30th April, 1999, therefore, he worked for two and half year. The labour court before denying the relief of reinstatement observed that after 1995 there was ban on appointment imposed by the State Government. Since the labour court has applied its mind before granting relief to the petitioner, therefore, I do not find that 2 labour court has committed any illegality in denying the relief of reinstatement to the petitioner. So far as compensation is concerned, Rs.25,000/- appears to be adequate compensation, which has been awarded by the tribunal vide award dated 9.2.2009. Hence, there is no merit in this writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-