/^fo^ S3 ¥. Daya Bhhattacharya, wife of R.K.Bhattacharya, aged about 38 years, Resident of 10/19 Nehm Nagar (East) Bhiiai, Chhattisgarh Vs. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Registrar, Firm 85 Societies, 0-5, Anupam Nagar, Raipur (CG) 2. Sindhi Bradar Mandal, Through the Gen. Secretary, Sindhi Bhawan, Street No.3, Sector4,Bhilai, Durg(CG) 3. Suresh Ratnani, President, Sindhi Bradar Mandal, Resident of Shop No.5, Manohar Medicosa, Sector : BUlai, Durg (CG) 4. Mr, Vijay Jasuja, Working President, Sindhi Bradar Mandal, Resident of Block No.2, House No.6, Priyadarsini Parisar (West) Nehru Nagar, Bhilai Durg (CG) 5. Mr. Suneet Goklani, General Secretaiy, Sindhi Bradar Mandal, Resident of HIG 2/9, Board's Extension, Durg (CG) 6. Mr. Ashok Mulchandani, Chief Election officer, Sindhi Bradar Mandal, Sindhi Bhawail, Street No.3, Sector-4, Bhiiai (CG) 7. MT. Dilip Khatwani, Additionai Election Officer, Sindhi Bradar Mandal, Sindhi Bhawari, Street No.3, Sector 4, Bhilai, (CG). 8. Mr. Rakesh Nagdev, Additional Election Pfficer, Sindhi Bradar Mandal, Sindhi Bhawan, Street No.3, Sector 4, Bhilai (CG) WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLB 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri) Shri Anil Tripathi, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the State. 2. (Passed oa this 31«*day ofOctober, 2007) The petitioner, by this petition, challenges the rejection of her nomination for contesting election to the post of representatives in the election to be held on 29.10.2007. The indisputable facts, in nut shell, are that as per election schedule dated 1st October 2007 {Annexure P/3), i'or holding election of the office i^S r 3, 4. -T-- bearers of the management of Sindhi Bradar Mandal, the petitioner filed nomination on 16.10.2007 which was rejected. The election for the management of the Mandal was to be heid on 29.10.2007. At this stage, once election prccess has started, this Court cannot interfere with the election process. if the petitioner has any grievance, the petitioner may challenge the same at appropriate stage, before appropriate forum afterelection is held. In view ot' the foregoing, no interi'erence is warranted. The petition is accordingly, dismissed, Sd/- SatishKAgnibotri Judge Suguna ^-