^; ^ mOH COURT <»CHHATTISOAIW AT WS^ASPVR erjrj.so.iTOof aoii MynnonBR: APPUCAKT yBRSSB RBaSPOnDEMT/ HOW-APPUeA»Ts 2. 3. Jaia Trust, Bfaitei Nagar & AIdifl Bharateaishiya D^aBnbaT iJaijai? Parisfaad, Ncw DeUu, .ttuou^li, Balwant Rai Jam, S/o tote Stul Joti Prasad Jaia, aged 82 yeafs, President Jain Trust, Bhflai &, Akfail Bharatvarshiya Digainbar Jaia Rarishad, Ncw Delhi, resident -63, Nehru N^ar, BNlai, District Dvag (CC^, Stete of CIt&attis^rh TSeough PoTace Station Bhatti, Bfailai District Dutg, CtihattisgMti. ; ^ PBTIITON iraiDESR SECTKMI 482 OF 1MB CUWB <Mfc ; cstxmswLrwxsifyiSsBB. (SB :aoBT>te Mr. T^P.SIiarma, J.| Preseilt:- Dr. N.K. ShuMa, Sr. AdvcK^te with Ms. A. Sea G'upte, „ J Advocate fer the petitioaaer. Mr.'Pradeep Siagfa, P.L. &r tIieState/respoaadeat. OSAL-osaxEast (Passedon 28/03/2011) By fhls petition undcr Sectwn 482 of the Code of Criaaatal Rroocdure, 1973, (in sfaort the Code^ petittoner has chaUengea (he tegd^- aad propriely of the order dated 25/2/3011 passed by SessiEaas Judge, Duig ia Ctiminal revision No. 66/2010 affirming the order dated 21/4/2010 passed by Judicial Magisteate First Glass, Dutg in cnmmal case No, 2145/2005 whereby leanned Jiidfeial M^tetrate Pirst CIass, Diug has dismissed ttie petition for interim custody of TtrOwJwrSSahaveeryQxS. ofjain Conununity. Learued couasel for fhe parties are lieard. Learaed coiiascl for ttie petitioncr subnaits that present petitioaer is aot claming fhe deity/idol as aa owner but fhey are trusly of ^Ehil Bharatvarshiya Digainbar Jaia Paishad and their idol which they 1 -^- used to wca-sbip is m Xc^ariGrf for toi^ taae. They sme ready to hMid ovcrfhe idol to person whom Ooiut wffl •SmaSty cnxter bat dtuiag f^ penod of pendcncy of ttial, It would not be ptoper to teep ttie idol/deity in aiiy sect/eotnmnnity ia Seycmxt, „ , s^ On fbc ofherhaad, teacaed coua8elfiM-ttieiatat^respondento(yosed» ,fbe pctitfoa. and subaaits fhat aUeged d^/idol te costiag ^s, 3,00,00,OQO/- and Cpurtbekw havc righfly disxafesed fhe petttioni. EarUer petltion under Section 482 ofthc Code w^ fited ia Cr.M.P.. No. 371/2010 wbich has been aflowed aad tewiafoaal Coiut is directed to pass appTopnate Otder oa inerits. As per Qirier impugncd, no ofher persons basie claimed ttie ^»resaid ido]/deity ^ their properly. Present petitfoaer is aot clatoaiag fhe, property as an owner but is clanm^; oaty for tts pn»permafatteQaace and proper respcct In these cfocumstances, Goatinaaace ofcustBdy of said deily/idolofauy of sect/coixuuunity ia Weyafat or custody rftbe Court would not servc fhc purpose and to giveproper»espectsuch deily/idol and for pioper custody ia (he iuterest of justice, satnc wouM be nccessaiy to hand over the propcrly to petillemer/Jaia t»ast. Oansequeatly, pettttoa te aBowed. Both the ordecs fcnpugaed: are hereby set-^iide. On ftmusUng a beiid of Rs. 5,00,000/- with 1w© siBeties on behalf of fhe petitioner for piopcr security and laaintenaace of fhe property/delty /idol, tiU. disposal of tfae ctae property/deity/idol shall be givea to fhc petitioner ia interia oustody. I.A. No. 01 is disxnissed simuaarity. Certlfi.ed cbpy as per rulcs. n/ T.P. Sharma Judge ^-