IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.565 of 2006 MADAN PRASAD SAH Versus SATYA NARAIN PRASAD ----------- 5 11.12.2008 After some arguments, Counsel for the petitioner, finding himself to be in an inescapable situation, would pray for withdrawal of this civil revision application with an undertaking of the petitioner that he will vacate the suit premises within a period of six months from today and handover the vacant possession of the shop in question to the opposite party no.1, the plaintiff on 10th of June, 2009. Counsel for the opposite party has no objection to the aforementioned proposal and undertaking of the petitioner with regard to vacating the suit premises within a period of six moths but he apprehends that he may still not be given vacant possession. Counsel for the opposite party would also contend that if such an accommodation is being given to the petitioner, he must be directed to pay rent up to the month of June, 2009 This Court in the light of submissions of the parties, therefore directs the petitioner to handover the vacant possession of the premises in question positively by 10th of June, 2009 as also pay rent up to 10.6.2009 failing which the opposite party shall have a liberty to 2 move this Court alleging non-compliance of this order and thus committing contempt by the petitioner of the undertaking given by him. With the aforementioned observations and direction, this civil revision application is permitted to be withdrawn. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)