d^' r^. ^-1 ^' IIFORE THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. ^O^/ 2009 PETITIONER Mahesh Kumar S/o Rajaram Ahirwar, aged about 22 years, R/o Saja District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RE8PONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through - the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. J^ A^y'^ ../^^' .-••'*' ,^^.^\/^%y' ./ 3- -(y ^' .^°''.^^" <^"...-"" '<^"" y^ 2 State High Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny CommitteeRaipur (C.G.) The Sub-Divisional Officer Saja, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 4. Naib Tahsildar, Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ^JU PETITION UNDER ARTICLE t226 OF THE CONSTITUTIOM OF INDIA. ^. ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WntPetition(C)No, 4202 of 2009 Petitioner Versus Respoudeats 1. 2. 3. 4. 4. Mahesh Kiunar S/o RajaraBi Ahinvar, aged about 22 years, R/o Saja, District Durg (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretan7, Tribal Wetfare Departraent, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipiir, Chhattisgarh. State High Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Conmiittee, Raipur (C.G.) The Sub Divisional Of&cer, Saja, Distt, Durg (C.G.) Naib TahsUdar, Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G.) (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia) (SB: Hon^le Shri Satish K. Agnihotri J.) SIiii T, K. Tiwaii, Advocate for the petitioner. SliriAnin Sao, Govt. Advocate for the respondents. pRDERforaIt ( Passed on tbis 8th day ofAugust, 2009) Heard. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, subraits that the petitioner does not waat to contest this laatter ou inerits, at this stage. PIowever, he subinits that the Caste Scnituiy Comiaittee, which has declmed to accept the appUcation to verify the certt&cate of social status of the petitiouer, granted by the competent authority, may be directed to accept the appUcation of the petitioner, verify the certi&cate aad pass appropriate order, m accordauce with law. Shri Arun Sao, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the re?.pc ijdent^/State ^idy subm.its that ifaii applfcation is niade, llx s 1 all be considered and decided, ia accordance with law, witlihi a period of six weeks. In view of the above, accordiag to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication. The writ petition is accordmLgly disposed of. No order asto costs. Thab.ir -L-.-- Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge