1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 175 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4409 OF 2007 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Mr. A.S.Bajaj,Advocate for applicant. Mr. D.R.Kale, A.G.P. for State. ........................... [ CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR, J. ] DATE : 10/03/2010 PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The withdrawal of the petition was with liberty to prefer appeal for appropriate relief against the order of injunction. Now, restoration is sought on the ground that the petition could be entertained in respect of the order whereby stay was refused. Upon hearing counsel, it is amply clear that the Appeal preferred by the petitioner has been disposed of on the ground that the regular Appeal is fixed for final 2 hearing against the decree rendered by the trial Court. For the same reason, I deem it proper to decline the restoration of the petition in as much as the Appeal against the original decree is likely to be heard and finally disposed of within a short span of period. The Civil Application disposed of. [ V.R.KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE knp/CA 175.09