Crl. Misc. No. M-16498 of 2011 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-16498 of 2011 Date of Decision: November 22, 2011 Dr. Shakti Kumar and others …..Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr. Sanjeev Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Shalini Attri, DAG, Haryana. Mr.A.D.S. Sukhija, Advocate for the complainant. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioners seek the concession of pre-arrest bail in a case registered at the instance of Anil Kumar, complainant alleging that his brother Ram Kumar had a dispute with Management of a College and on May 9, 2011, the petitioners attacked the complainant causing simple injuries. Offence under Section 326 IPC was added on account of Amar Singh having caused a grievous injury on the person of the complainant. So Crl. Misc. No. M-16498 of 2011 [2] far as petitioners are concerned, it appears that during the course of enquiry/ investigation the part attributed to them has been found to have not been substantiated by sufficient material. Petitioners have joined investigation. Counsel for the complainant has intervened to oppose the petition for bail alleging that the investigation/ enquiry conducted qua the petitioners is unfair. Without expression of any opinion on the validity of the enquiry, it is sufficient to observe that the petitioners have joined investigation and no grievous injury has been attributed to the petitioners. In views of the above, the petition is allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioners they will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the conditions that the petitioners will join investigation as and when required by the police and that they will not tamper with the evidence or hamper the investigation in any manner. November 22, 2011 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDG