IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.265 of 2009 Rameshwar Paswan S/O Late Sukhnandan resident of Village Gyashpur, P.S- Bakhtiyarpur, Distt- Patna Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Bihar State Electricity Board through Its Chairman, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 3. The Chief Engineer Central Electricity Area Board, Serpentine Road, Patna 4. The Superintending Engineer Electricity Supply Circle, R.Block, Patna 5. The Executive Engineer Electricity Supply Division, Court Area, Barh, Distt- Patna 6. The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply, Sub-Division, Bakhtiarpur 7. Kameshwar Paswan S/O Late Sukhnandan resident of Village-Gyaspur, P.S- Bakhtiyarpur, Distt- Patna Opposite parties -------- 03/ 11.08.2010 Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is two folds. First when the order was passed in CWJC No.11924 of 2004 there was no suit pending before a civil court and second that application for compassionate ground is still pending with the authorities. Neither of these two grounds stated by the petitioner in any manner establish the fact that the order is erroneous to the extent that it requires review for so-called error apparent on the face of the record. The order speaks for itself and the reasons for rejection of the writ petition are cogent and valid. No case for review is made out. The review application is dismissed. shahid (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)