IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :16.02.2010 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Writ Petition No.37671 to 37673 of 2006 (T) O.A.No.10162 of 1998 S.Murugesan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.37671 of 2006 N.Vallinayagam Pillai ... Petitioner in W.P.No.37672 of 2006 N.Christopher ... Petitioner in W.P.No.37673 of 2006 vs 1.The State of Tamilnadu, rep. by The Secretary to Government Rural Development Department Secretariat Chennai- 600 009. 2.The Director of Rural Development Department Jeens Road,Saidapet, Chennai – 15. 3.The District Collector Collectorate Kanyakumari District Kanyakumari. ...Respondents in W. P. No.37671 to 37673 of 2006 4. Prayer W. P. No.37671of 2006 : This Writ Petition came to be numbered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by way of transfer of O.A.No.10162 of 1998 from the file of the Tamil Administrative Tribunal with a prayer to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner with effect from the date of initial appointment with all monetary and service benefits. Prayer W. P. No.37672 of 2006: This Writ Petition came to be numbered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by way of transfer of O.A.No.10164 of 1998 from the file of the Tamil Administrative https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Tribunal with a prayer to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner with effect from the date of initial appointment with all monetary and service benefits. Prayer W. P. No.37673 of 2006 : This Writ Petition came to be numbered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by way of transfer of O.A.No.10163 of 1998 from the file of the Tamil Administrative Tribunal with a prayer to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner with effect from the date of initial appointment with all monetary and service benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Singaravelan For Respondents : Mr. B. Vijay Govt. Advocate O R D E R These writ petitions have been filed to direct the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioners with effect from the date of initial appointment with all monetary and service benefits. 2. Three casual labourers working in various panchayat unions in Kanyakumari District seek regularisation. The learned counsel for the petitioners now states that the Government has issued G.O.Ms.No.21, P& A.R. Dated 25.2.2006 and G.O.Ms.No.22, P & A.R., dated 25.2.2006 and the petitioners are entitled to seek the remedy under the said G.Os. In view of the changed circumstances, the petitioners are entitled to make representations based on the G.Os. referred to above and the same shall be considered and disposed of on merits by the first respondent within three months thereafter. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/- Asst. Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar. ra To 1)The State of Tamilnadu, rep. by The Secretary to Government Rural Development Department Secretariat, Chennai- 600 009. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2)The Director of Rural Development Department Jeens Road,Saidapet, Chennai – 15. 3)The District Collector Collectorate Kanyakumari District Kanyakumari. + 1 CC TO Mr.R.Singaravelan, Advocate Sr 10580 + 1 cc to Govt., Pleader High Court, Madras-104, Sr 10972 W.P.No.37671 to 37673 of 2006 RSN (CO) RH (8.3.10) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/