L;i['-^<rt3 Vs S*. SINiiLE SEj f^^.i C^ t^-^— IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR : WRIT PETITIOIL(S) NO.<S&k<5 OF 2010 PETITIONER f~) v^ I'p' *"~ ^^°£? ^yy .^^^ <>.•'"'• ^y ^ ^''.c^ .-••" ' ^'.^••" RESPONDENTS /: 1 /-2. 3, ^4. / SMT. REKHA THAKUR Aged about 64 years, W/o Shri Brijmohan singh Thakur, Retired Bal Mandir Pathika, Nagar Palika Bal Mandir Sakti, R/o Ward no.09, Raja Para, Sakti, Distt.Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh). VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, ^ Through Secretary, Urban Administration and Development Department D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). DEPUTY DIRECTOR (PENSIONS) Directorate of Urban Administration and Development, Raipur (C.G.). COLLECTOR, And President District Town Development Agency, Distt.Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) PRESIDENT Nagar Palika Parishad, Sakti District-Janjgir -Champa (C.G.). Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Sakti District-Janjgir -Champa (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 TSF "4i<iio'4, "Q-nly'ifi, fqcii'Mli.< ...U:.£.:..^l^.:..^^ SIT^T -^v (^SI^IT) an^i w h-f\* wnsn^iwiNr T^ITW ^lfet 3TI^T chT<il[fl*QTl TCIH^ ^ 'fe^ <n»i-^.|<. ^7sifOT3n^?i \- S£iB • U(w»nF?i3tTKl 1Ui"S> -iry?&'BlT<H11? 1»l?fTl?1ifr' • yi.\fi^~ OLtSf iviCTx. u u o i &^& r'£s-iii,ne vK Shri Ashok Swamkar, counsel Shri Vaibhav Govedhan, P.1. fc| Grievance of the petitioner in retired from the oost of Bal Mandir her retiral dues in particuiar, the I[ and time bound increment arrears hl It has been submitted by the has already made several representa| P/6 to the resp. No.5 but no order the petitioner may be pennitted to be issued for deciding the representa) State counsel submits that reoresentation to the respondent N< decide the same in accordance with ]| Accordingly, the petitioneris with the aioresaid liberty. IN the representation by the petitioner with| date of receipt ot copy ot this orderj authority concemed as expeditious] period of four months from the date It is made ciear that this on merits of the case and the authoit to decide the same strictiy in accord^ htve Coujrt for the petitioner. )r the State, |he present petition is that she has pathika on 31.8.2010 but till date b'ovident Fund, leave encashment not been paid to her. ;ounsel t'or the petitioner that she :ions vide Annexures P/1 to P/4 & )ias been passed. He submits that |ithdraw this petition and direction i|tion of the petitioner. let the petitioner make a fresh P.5 and in tum the resp. No.5 to &w. fcermitted to withdraw this oetition |eventuality of making aiiy fresh |n a period of three weeks from the the same shall be decided by the [y as possibie, preferably within a bf its receipt. has not expressed any opinion ity concemed would be at liberty bice with law, Sd/- pritinker Diwakar Judge