1 mmj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (L) NO.344 OF 2009 Majid Ahmed Oomerbhoy .. Appellant Versus Afzal Abdul Sattar Oomerbhoy & ors. .. Respondents Mr. Pranav Sampat a/w Ms. Prajakta Mhatre i/b Thakore Jariwala & Associate for Appellant Mr. Astad Ramderia a/w Ms. Aditi Prabhu i/b Desai Desai Carramji & Mulla for Respondents Mr. R.S.Kelaskar, Assistant (Representative of Court Receiver present) CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : 11 th March, 2010 P.C.: 1。 This appeal under the letters patent is directed against the interlocutory order dated 4 th September 2009 passed on Court Receiver’s Report No.245 of 2008, submitted in Arbitration Suit No. 154 of 1991. We have noted that by the said order, the Learned Trial Judge sought to correct the inadvertance that had taken place while discharging the Court Receiver as on 2 nd December, 1992, itself. Paragraphs No. 16 and 17 of the said order clearly indicated that the 2 Court Receiver ought to have been discharged on 2 nd December 1992 itself, and as it was not so done, the impugned order came to be pass only by way of clarification. 2。 We are, therefore, satisfied that the order discharging the Court Receiver cannot cause any prejudice so as to entertain the Appeal and hence the Appeal is dismissed. (SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.)