IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 6TH SEPTEMBER 2011 / 15TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23723 of 2011(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------- DR.S.K.SREEDEVI, GUEST LECTURER (SANsKRIT), SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, RESIDING AT `SOUPARNIKA', PALLICKAKAL POST, KOTTARAKKARA, PIN-691 506. BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF SRI.R.KRISHNAKUMAR (CHERTHALA) RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR, P.O.KALADY, ERNAKULAM, PIN-683 574. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVESRSITY OF SANKRIT, P.O.KALADY, ERNAKULAM-683 574. BY STANDING COUNSEL SHRI P.C.SASIDHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/09/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX IN W.P.(C)No.23723/11 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DT.9/10/2007. EXHIBIT P1(A): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DT.6/6/2005. EXHIBIT P1(B): TRUE COPY OF THE EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT.21/5/2009. EXHIBIT P1(C): TRUE COPY OF THE EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT.1/10/2010. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN OP.9613/98. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT.22/3/2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS :NIL TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.23723 of 2011 -------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 6th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2011 J U D G M E N T The petitioner herein is seeking for a direction to the University to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P3 representation. 2. This is a case where the petitioner was initially appointed as Lecturer in Sanskrit from 1.8.1995 after a due process of selection. Pursuant to the judgment in Writ Appeal No.826/96 , the appointment of persons including the petitioner was cancelled. Thereafter the petitioner was continuing on contract basis. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that so far no action has been taken for regular recruitment or for regularisation. The Petitioner relies upon the orders passed by the University in respect of other Lecturers whose appointments have been regularised. 4. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the University. 5. It is upto the University to take a decision on Exhibit W.P.(C)No.23723/11 -2- P3 representation in accordance with law. There will be a direction to the University to take a decision on Exhibit P3 representation and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Since the Syndicate will have to take a decision, the Vice Chancellor will place Exhibit P3 representation before the Syndicate for appropriate decision. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn