IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.385 of 2007 RAJU PRASAD @ RAJU SAO GUPTA Versus KUNJ BIHARI SAO & ORS ----------- 7 15/12/2008 Heard counsel for the parties. Counsel for the defendant-tenant- petitioner says that in view of subsequent development after the judgment and decree dated 5.1.2007 in Eviction Suit no. 12 of 2001 as the petitioner has handed over vacant possession of the premises in question to the plaintiff-landlord- opposite party he would not like to press this application. Counsel for the opposite party is present and has no objection to the aforesaid prayer of the petitioner. This application is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar