IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS TUESDAY, THE 21ST JUNE 2011 / 31ST JYAISHTA 1933 WP(Crl.).No. 296 of 2011() -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- PONNAMMA JOHN, AGED 46 YEARS, W/O.LATE M.JOHN VARGHESE, MURINGASSERIL HOUSE, KAITHAKODI P.O., AYROOR. BY ADV. SRI.MVS.NAMBOOTHIRY RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA PIN - 689 645. 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOIPURAM POLICE STATION, PIN - 689 531. 3. ARUN, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, KADIYAM KUNNIL HOUSE, AYROOR NORTH P.O., PIN - 689612 NJUZHOOR MURI, AYROOR. 4. SREEKUTTAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, KADIYAM KUNNIL HOUSE, AYROOR NORTH P.O., PIN - 689612 NJUZHOOR MURI, AYROOR. ADV. SRI.ARUN.B.VARGHESE FOR R3,4 GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SHRI C M KAMAPPU FOR R1&2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT. P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL // TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE K. M. JOSEPH & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS JJ., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(Crl.) No. 296 of 2011 S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of June, 2011 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph J., The petitioner is the mother of the alleged detenue, Thara John. Allegation of detention is made against respondents 3 and 4. 2. Today the alleged detenue was present. The third respondent is also present. We interacted with the alleged detenue, the third respondent and the petitioner. We heard learned counsel for the parties also. 3. The alleged detenue is undergoing B.Sc. Nursing Course at Madras Medical Mission Hospital, Chennai. We permitted the alleged detenue to interact with the third respondent. The alleged detenue would say that she would like to go with her mother and to complete her Course. She would further say that she is in love with W.P.(Crl.) No. 296 of 2011 :2: the third respondent and wants to get married with him. 4. The petitioner would say that she will not compel the alleged detenue to undergo any marriage contrary to her wishes. She also would say that if after completing the Course, the alleged detenue will persist with the desire to get married with the third respondent, she will not stand in the way of the marriage of the alleged detenue with the third respondent. She however requests that the third respondent may not contact the detenue as long as the alleged detenue is undergoing her B.Sc Course. 5. In view of the stand of the alleged detenue that she would like to go with her mother and to continue with her Course, which she is undergoing, we permit the alleged detenue to go with the petitioner/mother so that she may complete her B.Sc Course. We make it clear that the petitioner will not in any manner threaten or intimidate the alleged detenue in connection with her affair with the third respondent. She will not also compel the allege detenue to undergo any marriage contrary to the wishes of the alleged detenue. We record the statement of the third respondent that he will not W.P.(Crl.) No. 296 of 2011 :3: interact with the alleged detenue till she completes her B.Sc Course. The third respondent would say that he will hand back the belongings of the alleged detenue to the petitioner within two days. The W.P.(Crl.) is disposed of as above. K.M.JOSEPH, (JUDGE) M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, (JUDGE) dl/