IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. LPA No. 1303 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: June 30, 2010 Shri Krishan Malik …Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: None for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against order dated 17.9.2009, passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP No. 11074 of 2008. There is categorical finding that the petitioner did not fulfill the requirements of the Rules of having 10 years experience on the post of Assistant, which is essential qualification for promotion to the post of Superintendent. It has also come on record that the appellant was promoted on an ex-cadre post, which was outside the cadre. He wanted to come back to the cadre by seeking promotion but he lacked necessary experience of 10 years for the post of Assistant for promotion to the post of Superintendent. Accordingly, we do not find any legal infirmity warranting interference of this Court in appeal. The appeal does not warrant admission. Dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (A.N. JINDAL) June 30, 2010 JUDGE Pkapoor 2