IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No.367 of 2010 Date of Decision: 8.4.2010 Didar Singh ..Appellant versus State of Haryana and others. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKUL MUDGAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present : Mr.Rajinder Goyal, Advocate for the appellant ……… MUKUL MUDGAL, C.J. (Oral) Before pressing the issues raised in the appeal, counsel for the appellant submits that he will be satisfied in case respondent No.2 looks into the representation Annexure P5 dated 17.11.2009 and pass an order thereon. We accordingly dispose of the appeal and direct respondent No.2 to dispose of the representation Annexure P5 dated 17.11.2009 filed by the appellant not later than four months from today. (MUKUL MUDGAL) CHIEF JUSTICE 08.04.2010 (JASBIR SINGH) gk JUDGE