IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4’2 é5/2004 JV r PETITIONER AW Deepak Kumar Adil aged about — 29 years S/O Late \o “F Q / Puneshwar Prasad Ad11 R/O J\ Model Tow Near Gayatrl Departmental Stores B, Distt.- Durg, (C.G.) 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretaly Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. awan, Raipur, (C.G.) 2. Deputy Director Education Distt- Durg, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Drug. 4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpat Panchayat Dhamdha WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTCLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA n h11a1 VERSUS Bh ’/ 13-D7v2819 Shri Shn‘jith Nair, wunse} for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, Pane! Lawye for the $mtelre$pondents No.1, 2, andz. None for respondent No.4 th ugh sewed. This petition has been fried y the petitioner for direction to consider the petitioner for appointment n the Education Department on an apprehension that the present pos of Shiksha Karmi to which the petitioner has been appointed may not con nue. However, there is no materiai on record to show that any order oft mination of service of the petitioner after grant of compassionate appointm nt has been passed or propooed to be passed. On the other hand, learn eounsei for respondent No.1 to 3 aiso submits that in the absence of ther being any order or any decision or policy, it cannot be assumed that havi g granted compassionate appointment petitioner wouid be discontinued aft r specific period. Though this petition has re ainedpending since 2004, there is no materiai on record to show that an action of termination of the petitioner has been taken up. Accordingiy, the ap rehension of the petitioner, which ied him to tile this petition, appears to be ' out substance. Accordingly, this petition is naiiy disposed off reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court in ase, any rights are adverseiy affected. .i l Manmdra Mohan Shrrvastava Judge , l L w l Sd/— Dwpli smith: this {tat-new, Kai-Theirs —+‘S/147—2/2mo —1 ,oc,ooo.