Civil Revision No.1796 of 2001 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.1796 of 2001 Date of Decision: March 27, 2009 Satish Kumar and others .......Petitioners Versus Kasturi Lal and another .......Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr.CB Goel, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Satinder Khanna, Advocate for the respondents. --- JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. 1. The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 15.3.2001 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ludhiana whereby fresh notice for auction has been issued. The parties entered into partnership business and set up two firms, namely, M/s Sudesh Spinning Mills and M/s G.K. Spinners. However, the partnership ended shortly followed by the series of litigation. 2. After witnessing lot of litigation, the parties ultimately entered into memorandum of understanding/compromise dated 26.12.2005, a copy whereof has been produced and taken on record as mark 'X'. As per the compromise, all the proceedings, civil and criminal, were on account of some misunderstanding, which stood removed between the parties with the Civil Revision No.1796 of 2001 -2- intervention of the respectables. Accordingly, both the parties settled the matter and decided to end the entire litigation in terms of memorandum of understanding/ compromise. The memorandum of understanding/ compromise contained the list of the cases pending between the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the parties admit the memorandum of understanding and state that the parties are not interested in pursuing the present revision petition. 4. In view of the statement made by the counsel for the parties, no further order in the present petition is called for. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. ( JITENDRA CHAUHAN ) March 27, 2009 JUDGE SRM Note: Whether to be referred to reporter ? Yes/No