IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.8976 of 2008. Decided on: 22.12.2010. Madan Lal. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate No. 1 to 3. General with Mr.J.S.Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. For the respondents No.4 & 5 : Mrs. Archana Dutt, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) Mr. Dilip Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 22, 2010. (krt) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.