'x IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ^ :1 AT.BILASPUR C0>s^7- ContemptJEetition No. / U ^ /2010 SnBl8"flen PETITIONER ^•••'. ^' ^ ^••vv^ ^f..^ ^\^' .-^\-" .^c Smt. Kavita Yadav W/o Shri Pramod Kumar Yadav, Aged about 43 years, Assistant Teacher/Superintendent of Pre- Metric Schedule Caste, Girls Hostel Baramkela, Block Baramkela, Dist Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : CONTEMNORS •2) 1) Shri H.R. Chouhan Lssistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) Kumari Kaushalya Bhagat Shiksha Karmi Grade -III Superintendent of Pre-Metric Schedule Caste, Girls Hostel Baramkela, Block Baramkela, District Raigarh (C.G.) . CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT T 3TT^T^T fclich 371^1 5^^ich ^Tftry Deepti ~?^[ ^t^||d<4, ^•dl^JI^. f®l<yll^<l< WWril5b+1|cb 3?T^T ^f^K ...G^.:....^?.^£J^.A^/^ "•^R^ST' ^TT^T ^Rff^R TTlt?T sB_LHi3n!bJe__SnrLManInQr_aAoriari Shri H.S. Patei, counsei for th| Shri Y.K.Tnakur, counsei for r| Shri N,Naha Roy, counse! for| Respondent No.l-Shri H.R. respondent No.z-Kumari Kaushalya it is jointly submltted by petitiorier, aunng tne penaency o'r tn| 27/12/10. Thls fact has als| additionai repiy flied on 3/3/201 1. instructions^submits thatthe petition^ post. Contempt as alieged by the order was passed by thls Court on though the petitioner was not comp<{ petltioner was not aiiowed to work oj fiied cn affldavit, It has In the office and the saiary has aiso Jn view of the deveiopments,| the petitloner has been promoted ir^ further It has been stated at ths bar| the post of Upper Dlvision Teacher, matter. Rule Is therefore dischargecj i^ petitioner. r^spondentNoJ. respondentNo.2. IChauhan, Assistant Cornrnissioner and phagat, are present in person. iefemed counsei for the parties that the |s petitjon, has been promoted vlde order ^o been brought on record by way of L^arned counsei for respondent No.1 upon ^r has proceeded to Join cn the promoted ctii<Lif<n41'i 'HPR^ff ^ feT^I' <p3i<^i< ^" ^ti^FT ^TT^T 5hriva_staya,.A ^ ^etitioner is that even though an interim pl/04/2010, against the order of transfer, ied to proceed and paid saiary aiso, the the post of Superintendent. In tne repiy that the petitioner was aliowed to continue |)een paid to her. Iwhich have taken piace, particulariy that the rnonth of December, 2010 itseif and |that the petltioner has promoted on am not Endlned to proceed further in the The petition is finaiiy disposeaj^ff- sd/\ ^rivastava ^dta^s*>nva"" 1 r^^ -^•f7^~r( ^ EI^H" .'::^^,