1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 585 AND 586 OF 2009 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 113 OF 1997 (Yadav Damaji Ingle .v. Haribhau Sadashiv Ambalkar) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J. 07TH OCTOBER, 2009. Heard Shri A.V. Bhide, the learned Counsel for the applicant. This Court delivered a judgment on 08.04.2009 allowing the appeal preferred by the appellant. Learned Counsel for the appellant states that the respondent had in fact expired on 01.04.2009 but that was not within his knowledge and that is why the judgments stands rendered against the dead person. In order to have the correct person on record, he has filed separate application for bringing Legal Representatives on record. This application has not been opposed by the other side since none remained present on behalf of the respondent. For the above reason and since the judgment has been passed against dead person, same has to be recalled in terms of prayer clause made in Civil Application. Civil Application No. 855 of 2009 is allowed accordingly. 2 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 586 OF 2009 Heard Shri A.V. Bhide, the learned Counsel for the applicant. No reply is filed by the respondent. Civil Application No. 586 of 2009 is allowed in terms of prayer clause made in it. Legal Representatives are permitted to be brought on record. Issue notice to the Legal Representatives returnable on 16th December, 2009. JUDGE *rrg.