IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2010 / 21TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 37063 of 2009(C) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. TOMY IMMANUEL, S/O.IMMANUEL, AGED 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT MANKUDIYIL HOUSE, VADAKODE P.O., VAZHAKKULAM, MUVATTUPUZHA, PIN-686 670. 2. PATHUMMA, W/O.LATE HYDROSE, AGED 55 YEARS, MANGALATH PUTHENPURA, PEZHAKKAPPILLY P.O., PAIPRA, MUVATTUPUZHA, PIN-686 674. BY ADV. MR.C.K.PAVITHRAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- 1. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM. 2. THE TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P.N.SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/01/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J =============================== W.P(C) No. 37063 of 2009 ================================== Dated this the 11th day of January, 2010 ================================== J U D G M E N T The petitioners herein is legal heirs of licencees ARD 247 and ARD 26 in Muvattupuzha Taluk. The first petitioner's father was the original licencee in ARD 247 and pursuant to the application submitted by Ext.P2, he was called for an interview by District Supply Officer on 22/4/2009. The shop was attached to ARD 280. It is the case of the first petitioner that, in terms of Clause 45(2) of Kerala Rationing Order 1966 which enable the legal heirs for appointment and grant of licence, the said petitioner filed Ext.P1 application along with all the required documents. Aggrieved by the delay in making the appointment, he has filed this writ petition. 2. In the case of the second petitioner, Ext.P3 is the consent letter given by her deceased husband. Ext.P4 application is submitted for appointment and it is also -2- W.P(C) No. 37063 of 2009 submitted that Ext.P4 application was forwarded for enquiry and verification of documents and the same is over. In both these cases, proceedings are not finalised, relying upon the interim order in writ appeal No. 1217/2009. 3. It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that the Writ Appeal has been finally disposed of and there is no embargo now to consider and pass orders on their applications. 4. There will be a direction to the first respondent to finalise the proceedings for appointment as per the application of the petitioner within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. No costs. T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE nl