C A -3^? /? IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION fS) N0. ^ ^ j OF 2007 fS.B.) PETmONERS y /^ ^ A^/ ^/ )W <* ^ •'e- RESPONDENTS : ^ _ 1. Smt. Savitri Kuldeep, aged about 20 years Wife of Shri Raj Kuldeep, Aanganbadi Assistant (Sahayika) Bakodaguda, Resident of Rajapara, Badekanera, Tahsil Kondagaon, District Bastar (C.G.). 2. Smt. Bhuneshwar, aged about 24 years, Wife of Shri Sukhchand, Aanganbadi Assistant (Sahayika), Golawand Panarapara, Resident of Malgujarpara Golawand, Tahsil Kondagaon, District Bastar (C.G.). /3. Smt. Rajshree Thakur, aged about 32 years Wife of Narendra Thakur, Aanganbadi Assistant (Sahayika) Ghodagaon Schoolpara, Resident of Mundipara Ghodagaon, Tahsil Kondagaon, District Bastar (C.G.). VERSUS 1. State ofChhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Women and Child Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). r -! ^-2. The Collector Bastar, Jagdalpur District Bastar (C.G.). 3. The Chief ExecutiveOfficer, Zila Panch'a^at Bastar Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). 4. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Kondagaon, District Bastar (C.G.). 5. The District Programme Officer, Woman and Child Development Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). y6. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kondagaon, District Bastar (C.G.). WRIT PETITIONJJNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA % KIGHCQURT OFCHHATTiSGARH AT BILASPUR S!NSLE JENCH : HON'BLE MR.SATiSH K. AGNiHOTRt. J. Petittoner WRIT PETITJON (S.) N0,981 OF 2007 Smt. Savitri Kuldeep and others versus Resoondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others Present : Mr. Avinash K. Mishra, counsel for the petitionere. Ms. Sunte Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondenis No.1,2,4 and 5. None appears for other respondents. OR R (Passed on 20th Day of February, 2007) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners submits ttiat the petitioners were appointed as Anganbadi Worker by the Janpad Panchayat by order dated 1-7-20)6 ^-2). Thereaftsr, the petitioners had undergone required training for a period of one month. After having completed the required training, the petitioners have been apoointed as Anaanbadi Worker. 2. By order dated 31-1-2007 (P-1), respondent No.6 cancelled the seiection of Anganbadi Workers in several Anganbadl Centers, i.e., Bakodagura, Golavwand Panarapara, Ghoragawi Schoolpara, Sitati Platoara and others. Against the said order, the petitloners have filed this petition without availing atternattve remedy of statutory appeal to fte Director, Panchayat under the provisions of Rule 3(b) of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995. 3. Leamed counse! appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to fite a statutory appeai before the concemed authority. 4. tt is ordered accordinalv. Delay. if anv. occurred In pursuing this matter, may not be taken into account while entertaining the app^t of the petitioners. Gopa! 5. Thus, the writ petition is disposed of summarily. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge r