THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.2810 of 2000 JUDGMENT: The 1st respondent filed O.S.No.275 of 2000, in the Court of II Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against respondents 2 and 3, for the relief of perpetual injunction, in respect of the suit schedule property. An order of ad interim injunction was passed in I.A.No.363 of 2000, on 03.04.2000. The appellant herein filed an application, being I.A.No.634 of 2000, to get himself impleaded in the suit. Similarly, he field I.A.No.635 of 2000, with a prayer to vacate the order of temporary injunction, granted in I.A.No.363 of 2000. The trial Court dismissed the I.A., through order, dated 06.09.2000, on the ground that the application was filed, even before the appellant came to be added as a party. The same is challenged in this appeal. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents. Way back on 29.09.2000, this Court directed that I.A.No.635 of 2000 shall be heard along with I.A.No.323 of 2000. For all practical purposes, nothing was left to be decided. Be that as it may, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the suit itself is disposed of. Hence, the C.M.A. is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dated:26.08.2009. GJ