-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.343 OF 2004 APPEAL NO.343 OF 2004 APPEAL NO.343 OF 2004 WITH WITH WITH SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.361 OF 2004 APPEAL NO.361 OF 2004 APPEAL NO.361 OF 2004 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court’s Court’s or orders or directions Judge’s orders & Registrar’s orders. ............................................................. Ms Kumud Bhatia for the Appellant CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: AUGUST 11, 2006. AUGUST 11, 2006. AUGUST 11, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard Advocate for the Appellant. The Appellant in both these Appeals is the original Plaintiff. The Appellant was employed in a school. He filed two separate suits against the Head Master of the school and against the person claiming to be the Chairman of the trust which is running the school. The suits were filed for damages on the ground that the defendants have acted in malafide manner and have harassed and tortured the Appellant. 2. The learned Counsel for the Appellant submitted that the courts below have not -2- at all considered the oral and documentary evidence on record and findings of both the courts below are perverse. 3. I have considered the submissions. The courts below and especially the Appellate Court have considered the entire oral and documentary evidence on record. The Appellate Court has noted the objectionable conduct of the Appellant himself. The Courts below have held that the Appellant has failed to prove the allegations of harassment and torture. The findings of fact recorded by the courts below are based on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence on record. No interference is possible in the Second Appeal filed under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Hence, Appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs. Judge. Judge. Judge.