:£"».;''_;..;s^g ^,a ^~r^''^-:\ '"; SS: THE 'B23B • COBat ©E-tesaXA-'.i'SADESH'ail•^ABM.PN.. \. <;~,',-r^;^ .-.>:^...*:..:'';,^;"-••;/• :::\,;.^1, ^:WB;iT,^ETIEB38'S®.<:^^^^^ FE'EI'EIMERS .S.ESPOB^BITS' '?i^?^:.l:/;.:;•; ,-^e-:. {, 1. ^S!t;ate •-oy Madfaya Prade'sh," •tbrough^ Dlvi.sleaal Forest; Of:£icext, Kofria'- ProdBQtlon.Bl.T.i.sipat.Hanen.dE'aSar&^ .. Disl'te.'Sai?gy3a<,'. . ^•IJ. .:: : ..". ': •.... •-: ;—.:vmsys-::',.,:.;.--: ;:::'/,^ sr,1.,;,3>he',]3eguty Latiotu?; Gonaj.asa.onei't ^- '2.-;B66,|'i'esidlBg::0ffioer,:''tiabouF.,Ce?if''fe,:^ sz--""* •n •Bllaspiar, a ^' 5 ..GaB'egIi,,PFa,saa Fra^aga-ei:, Ex-Dplvery, Foresli-fiepar^m^t,: Keu'ia^Piwtte ^s——— :' •Bivls3.0n,'ManendragaFli»^'B;istf^.:^ar'gu,3aiS '^• T3XJ '--WfM'£etSSS^'2^^^Q^T^^SSS^:I'^^ ;: •o.F'r:3maA.'' •.:-.-:-'^:'':—''.':i.:/\'''—:-:' ';-..,l':''^:'l:'wy ^.^ »I8H ©B^lffllBKBAICTfcliB^tB^ fe L ^' 8fa(j^B«Bcb! Hmi'MetUirtttattAK.J)(griM>W,J. (rii—fi —ii»—t——fi»»i»—)»wl«—)*r.mNi •<t—iiii.i—iiii—i^ N— in Petitioaer W. V. Ifo. 11C8 af t9»S State <rf Madlgra ft^csh Vcrsus Respoiidents : The OfspvLty LAour oia»xs Stori Satisto Quirta, DQiuty GoiwrBn^t A^omto for fte petttitmer. Noae app^as for fhe respoaiAiat No. 3. (t7tb KovMibcr, SWO^ 1. Thc cmpltyee/respoaidait Ne. 3 was aiqaeirtcd ass J^y Eteweroa tetuptaary baste, lyoidfa-dated 29.9.t988 (Aat^mBe/e}, witb a coaidltfon that theappomtmentwoiild be etfectiwetiB 18.11.1988. It was fiirther pTescnbed tbstt (he ssppovitcaettt of Uie priltKaia* was pincly teniporary sea& coidd be tei-BriiMited at aay tiam. Oa fhe baste of ftris <Mdcr, the serwces of tte a»sponctert N®. 3/eaaptoyee came to aa cnd on 16. 11.1988. 2. Being a^riewed, the respoadent Ifo. 3/®a^8yeeprefet»ed^^^^^^ applicatioa brfoa'e the Lafeour Ccnut, Waspw. ' e tafcow Qyurt, aftw hem'mg both 'the parties, oaaae to Itie cc^haskui, <a fhe basm ofcertaiadepositfoas, aoton fhe basis (rfafgrdocumeat^y evidence, that thc peti.ttoner had woriffid fiom I.. 11.1M6 to 15,11.1988 for nioie flian 240 dsys. ~-t- Tf 3. LeaEDied eoansd fer the submits •Qaseet •Ose airaud of tite Labour Court, iaaa.pugaed herem., is petversc, as the emftoyee oiight to tewe worteed 240 days to a year preceding the date of termination. 4. After hearfa^ leaxaed coiuisel fer the petltioaer aad pcrusii^ •8ie reconis, I aax oftfie cotisidcred opimon fhat tfae lifltoourCourt has come to fhe coacluMan on fhe basis of hte worldng flxaa 1.11.198&to 1541.1988 fhat he li^ worted fbr naote ttoa 240 days. The fiading is enoaeous aad deserves to bc qas®hed.The second fiTiding that fhe pettUoner 'bssem. has nat conapBed with fhe pxovteioa cS Secttei 25-F of the Iiriastriri Diqputes Ac^ 1947 (Tor ahort "fbe Act, 1947*), te atoe mErt sasteaable. la tiie evcnt, if It is not establtsb.cd fhat ttle respoxident No. 3 bad woiiBed 240 days in a ycar precediag to ttedate ofiBtTenetanexrt/tet'miDatton, (faeemptoyee te not entMed to tate bea^ttrfSectioa %-Fof<&e Act, 1947. S. Tbs Constitutioaal Bench of Itoe Sttpromfr Oourt in Ifae csae of SeCTetary, State ofKaraataka aad OUiecVa. (toBadtevtp|an< OUiew1 hdd fliat the temporaiy eaqAq?ees aiqwmted/iecnated de-hors the coastfttttional scheme or not in acc<Mdaace wa& rales and ofher statutoiy proviaioas fiamed un^r prowaao to Artiele 309 ofthe Coastitation ofIndla wtttoout fawitn aU U»e e^flile eaadidates, ffac eniptoyec appcrintnneEt oa temporary basis, is not eatlfted to aay protectiCTa ie. or legiriaiiZErtioa: on ti&e bs^is of coatinuous emptoyment for a lang period. Itwees later onfeB by fhfi'Suprente Co<M"t in seveBed deeteions, soaa®of fhCTB. me ^' Bablu MIaertd SatfSiwsSSoa. CSerpa. BnK^oyea* ItodoB Va. aitoetd VatftasfU.oa Cmcys. Md. and wirtAer2, Acc®nataiOUCCT (AM) A.P. SRTC aad oy»e»»Va. P. cauurihFa Sddtana Rfw aad Oth»s3,Sarinder PnuwdnimntVa. U.P. Rajya Itridd Btprthm IBandi nutotad aad Others*. 6. Por Che reasons-stated above, (he impu(?ied amraud dated 22.10.94 (Annexiue/A) is quashfid aad fhis pefition is aBowed. la Itoe meaatime, if^fhe respoadeat No. 3/MB[rfoyee haa woated and has been psadways tar his work after the aswafd is peaaeS.or seay maount whatsoevcr paid to the respondeat No. 3feEapl0yee shaB. not be rriuadabte to fhe petitiDffler. 7. In the facts and circuatstances, there shafl be so Q^ber as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotrt Judge w i{(2006) 4 SCC 1} 2^06)6800310} 3{(2006) 7 SCC 488) -{(2006) 7 SCC 684} ^- "T