IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46735 of 2008 VINAY KUMAR SINGH, SON OF LATE CHANDRIKA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- ROHANA, P.S. + DISTRICT- VAISHALI Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. KUMARI USHA, W/O- VINAY KUMAR SINGH, D/O- CHALITTAR SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KURIYA (SOUTH) P.S.- KATHAIYA, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR ----------- 2 27.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a complaint case under sections 323 and 498A of Indian Penal Code for which summons were issued as far back as 2003 while he has moved before the Court below in 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to explain the delay. Be that as it may, considering the submission for desire of revival of matrimonial harmony, let the petitioner abovenamed surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail for a period of three months only upon furnishing the bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., West, Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint case no. 562/2003. On the date that he furnishes his bail bonds, notice shall be issued to the complainant through counsel representing her in the complaint case seeking her response. Based on any subsequent developments with regard to the same and the - 2 - attitude of the petitioner to the satisfaction of the court below, if the petitioner appears physically and surrenders to the jurisdiction of the court below within three months, his application for regular bail shall be considered in the light of aforesaid developments without being prejudiced by the limited grant of anticipatory bail by this Court pkj (Navin Sinha, J)