^1-^^3 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH 'AT BILASPUR fC.G.) WRn_PETITIQN..XSLMO, .•^..sl_2^.. OF ^2009 PETITIONERS ^ ^y1 .Vi'2^ fx- .^N^K \'~".^cA?f' ^.cW' RESPONDENTS 1. Dhanendra Kumar Dewangan Son of Shri Narayan Prasad Dewangan, aged about 27 years, Resident of Mahalaxmi Mandir, Patwapara, Takhatapur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). Abid Mohammed Ansari Son of Mohammed Khadim Ansari, aged about 26 years, Resident of Musalman Mohalla, Near Masjid, Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). Chandan Lal Anant Son of Shri Sudheram Anant, aged about 28 years, Resident of Mission Compound, Post Office Takhatpur, District Dila'spur (C.G.). Dhirendra Kashyap Son of Shri Shivshankar Kashyap, aged about 27 years, Resident of Chuchuhiyapara, Bilaspur (C.G.). VERSUS ' State of Chhattisgarh, through : The Secretary, Department of Land Revenue, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhcawan, Raipur (C.G.). ar 2. The Commissioner, Land Records, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.). 3. The Superintendent, Land Record, Bilaspur (C.G.). 4. The Collector (Land Record), Bilaspur (C.G.). 5. The Controller, Board af Professional Examination, Raipur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^— y\ \ ^ COURT OF CHHATTiSGAi Tlt^^ ^^ ^in ">^^ rsis ^fla S l'iirfl'3 St31 i'St^irf. A'»rf& 1^?~ JiV' WRIT !i°ii? "ff'g «?" i-'fei!U!ONERS Dhanendra Kumar Dewangan & Othere ^J State of ChhattisQarh & f ^r^) f^^'s.r's \ / ^-/iii^i,& EWrit isetition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of india) iingie Bench : Hon'bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotn, J. Shri Ashok Sons, counsei for the petltjeners. Shri M.P.S. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate'forthe State. Shri Sameer Behar, counse! for the resoondent Nu.5. Gowri Oi (Passed on th's 1Sm day "fSeptember, 2008) 1. Vtfith the consent of isarned counsei appearing for the parties, the oetition is heard fina!!v. 2. Learnsd counsei appearing for the petiiionsrs, on instructions, submiis thai the petitloners do not want to contest th;s c.etition on merits ai this sfage and prav that thev msv be permitted te make a repressntation to the Coiiector, Bilaspur, to consider thair cases. 3. Learned counsei appearing for the State submits that in fhe svent, the petitioners maks a representation, ths ssme shail be considered and decided. in accordance with iaw snd on its own merits, as exDeditiousiv as possible. preferabiv 'iviihin a oeriod of four v/eeks from the date of rece'Bt of the recresentaiion. 4. in vew of foregoing, accordmg to the iearned counse! appearing for ihe Detitioners. nothina surv'ives In this oetition for adiudication. Accordinaiv', the writ petition is disDosed of Sd/- _ . . SatishK.Agnihotn Judge