IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 13934 of 1998 Between: Smt. V. Sailaja Reddy, S/o V.C. Prakash Reddy, MLA's Colony, Road No. 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner, Circle No. V, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 3 Hyderabad Urban Development Authority Rep. by Vice Chairman Paig Palace Begumpet, Secunderabad. (R.3 is impleaded as per court order in W.P.M.P. No.5569 of 2002, dated 13-3-2002) .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents and their subordinates in trying to demolish the House No.8-2-293/82/L/10-B of Sri Venkateswara House Building Society for A.P. Legislators Ltd., Road No. 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-34 without issuing any proceedings or without providing any opportunity as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the house bearing No.8-2-293/82/L/10-B of the Petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.D.SUDARSHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: SMT.G.JYOTHI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent No.3: MR. S. SATYAM REDDY The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No.13934 of 1998 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that inasmuch as at present the authorities of the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad are not interfering in the subject building of the petitioner and they have passed an order for regularizing the subject construction, he is not pressing the present writ petition. Recording the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. However, if the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad intend to take any action against the subject building of the petitioner, it is open for the Corporation to take such an action after following the due process of law. ______________ N.V. RAMANA, J Date: 01-4-2005 Svv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner, Circle No. V, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. 3 The Vice Chairman, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority Paig Palace Begumpet, Secunderabad. 4 Two CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{PRASAD}