IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11569 of 2009 GUNESH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 15.4.2009 Heard. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner was disposed of vide order dated 13.9.2007 passed in Cr.Misc. No.24351/07 with certain observations. This Court had given a chance to the petitioner that in case the O.P.no.2 appears in person and expresses her desire to stay with the petitioner, the learned Magistrate may confirm the interim relief granted to the petitioner. The interim relief was granted for that specific purpose only. The learned counsel submits that though the petitioner was willing to keep the girl, latter was not ready to live with him. He further alleges that she has married another person. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner I do not find any ground for modify the order dated 13.9.2007 passed earlier in Cr.Misc.No.24351/07. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail which will be disposed of on its own merit. Let the order be faxed to the court concerned at the cost of the petitioner. Anilkr.sinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh,J.)