) ^•'•«,- 'Wf^ HlGHCOURrOFJUDlCATURECHMATTlSGARH:Bll.ASPUR SINGLEBENCH : HON'BLESHRIS.R.NAYAK,CJ. WRITPETITION N0.2365 OP 2006 PETtTIONER RESRONDENTS Smt, M. Shyamalamma, VWo Late M. Krishna Rao, Aged Afcidut55years, R/o Village Lingjadih, Tahsit & DistrictB!laspur(C.G) Vereus 1. State 6f Chhattisgarh, Through Secreteiy, Department of Revenue, Mantrataya, D^K.S. Building, Raipur '.:;;(^^'.:1 /. ..^'^ 2. Coliector, Collectorate, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur(C.G.) 3.^^^^^ T^ ^G^ .:•.^ ^.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 4. Munjcipal Corporation Bilaspur, Through The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur :(e,G^:- .,,'^.,,..: .:^ Present: Shri Upendra Bharat, Sftri?R.D. ^ai;Shri Sanjay K; Agrawal & ShriRajeevBliarat,leamedCounselforthepeUtioner. ShriUtkarshVerma,leamedDy.Govt.Adv.fortheState. ORAl.ORDER {PassedoiiS"' May.MCS) The grievance of the petitioner is that tHe petition sehedule property was assighed to her husb&nd during Ms Ifetime by the third I,'. •' •• . ' '•'• •' ' '. .'• '." . ' .. •'.- V resppndent. After his demise, the petitioner has inherited the petitipn schedyle propertyand she has been in actual possession and enjoyment Ofthesame. Whenthematter stpcdthus^accordingtothepetjtioner.the Authorities oftheMunicipal Corporation, Bilaspur, thefourtK respondent herejn, withbut reaspri orThyme and without anysemblance of legal right overthe petition schedule land have issued the impugned notice stating that the petitioner has encroached the petition schedule land and put up construc^on unauthorisedly and calting upon her to^ ^^^re ^SSiSS'S^SSS^^ge^9SWIW!S'-KS'9 -.2-- Subbu constryction'within seveh days and if she^somplieswith ttie demand; they wouldpro^dealtemativelai^^lsewHere.ffitheversionotthepep iGGin'eet, the petitioner can have effeetive and eomprehensive legal ^remedy by way 6f a suit before We jul^icrtional Givil Gourt^ vpetiUon®F^an^a^ilofprivate lawrevie?w?remedieslikedeclaratiCT injunction^ ^he dtepute l^ughtbefore.theCourtFelates^^to^^ petitiori'schedule property. VVHethentisftie property ofthe petitioner as clainried by tier or jt is the property^^frGovemme^ Gprporation, that question eanhot be^clecided in a symmary proceeding underArtiCle226oftheCoristitutipn.lnthatviewofWematter,ldecljne to entertain the;writ petition. Th0 writ petition isacGOrdingiyxlismissed, however, reserving liberty|te the petitioner to workout^-^ befoi'eStf'ieji.iliscliCtionalGivilCourt.No^costs. •^