IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5927 of 2011. 1.Manoj Kr.II S/o Inderdeo Prasad Resident of Mohalla Bind Toli, Sheikhpura P.O. Veterinary College, Patna-14. 2.Ajit Kumar Gupta son of Late R.L.L.Gupta, Resident of Dulari Kunj, Opp.Agrawal Press, Gari Khana Khagaul, District Patna (Bihar) ….Petitioners. Versus 1.Union Of India through Secretary, Ministry of Railway Rail Bhawan, New Delhi. 2.The General Manager (P) East Central Railway, Hajipur, Bihar. 3.The Divisional Railway Manager Danapur Division, Danapur, Patna. 4.The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Danapur Division, Danapur, Patna. 5. Sri H.N. S/o Sri C.D. Singh, Guard Danapur at Patna, resident of Mohalla Ashsiana Nagar Patna. 6.Ashtosh Kumar son of N.P.Sharma, Resident of Mohalla Anandpur, P.O. & P.S. Khagaul, District, Patna (Bihar). 7.Ghanshyam Prasad Singh, son of Sri Bari Narayan Singh resident of Mohalla Ramji Chowk, Govt. School Road, Bata Ganj, Patna -20. 8.Pervez Ahmad Ansari son of Late M.Q.Ansari Resident of Mohalla Moti Chowk, P.O. & P.S. Khagaul District Patna. 9.Kumar Rakesh son of Late Jagat Singh Resident of Mohalla Sough Chandmari Road, Budh Nagar, Road No.3,(Last), Kankarbagh, Patna-20. 10.Arvind Kumar son of R.N.Choudhary resident of Mohalla Pathaki Masjid Tekari Road, Patna-6. ….. Respondents. ------- 2. 06.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the Railways. By the impugned order dated 21st November 2008 O.A.No. 561 of 2008 preferred by the petitioners has been dismissed and no interference was made in the order of transfer of Respondent no.5 dated 25th February 2005 by 2 which he was transferred from Dhanbad Division to Danapur Division on administrative ground. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that such administrative transfer has made respondent no.5 senior to the petitioners, some of whom came to Danapur Division on request losing their earlier seniority. It has been further submitted that there was no good administrative ground for transfer of respondent no.5 to Danapur Division. The Tribunal has found that the transfer order of 2005 has been belatedly challenged in 2008 and it has further found no allegation of malice in the O.A. and has declined to go into the question whether there was sufficient administrative reason for the transfer made in February 2005. We find no good reason to take a different view in the matter. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. Jay/ ( Shiva Kirti Singh,J) (Shivaji Pandey, J)