HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition iArt. 227) No.1400 of 2011 PETITIONERI: M/s. Arihant Builders and Promoters A (Plaintiff) partnership firm through its partner Narendra Kumar Parakh S/o Shri Paanchilal Parakh, Aged about 51 years, R/o Parakh Mansion Gurhiyari, Raiopur, Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS: 1. Suraj Vaswani S/o Shri Satish Vaswani, Aged about Not known, C/o M/s Ravi Traders MG. Road, Raipur, Tahsil & Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector Raipur (C.G.) {Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India} Present: Mr. Virendra Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ankit Singhal, counsel for respondent No.1. Mr. Vinod Kumar Tekam, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.2. Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J ORDER (28—9-201 1) 1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has Challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 27-7-2010 _ passed by the 7‘“ Additional District Judge, Raipur in Civil Suit ' i No.27A/2006, whereby the objection relating to execution of a Commission in absence of the petitioner has been dismissed and the Court below has fixed the case for evidence of the Commission. 2. l have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the order impugned and copies of other documents. 3. While disallowing the objection of the petitioner, the Court below has given the following finding: - "musmmams‘aa—mw/Watw . aahrRhWWmaWmwmm?se \ Wztwewwatammwmww wahadargammwztwiiwmmmm met 2 3K0 WW$WW§®VHW$WWW WWW! W3W$mm$m® WWWW¢1W$WH§W$W wmwm’a‘l %:WWI¥M%W wm%@?mmqm$wm$mmamm §I mwwW§f§§WWa§rwmw§l W W$$W§$WWW§$$1WHI¥WW Wwmmwmy W w w W %§— 16.8.2010” p ‘ 4. In the light of aforesaid mding, I do not find any substance in the petition. ,4. Consequently, the petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. Soma Sd/— T. P. Shay-ma Judge