IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9534 of 2011 Pappu Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 4 08-07-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state. Admittedly, the informant is not an eye witness of the alleged occurrence. Allegedly, he came to know about the alleged occurrence on the basis of disclosure made by the deceased in hospital. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the statement of son of deceased has been recorded by the I.O. at paragraph-11 of the case diary in which, the aforesaid witness states that the deceased had consumed poison and so far as petitioner is concerned, there is nothing against him. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Pappu Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 288 of 2010 to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Masaurhi. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)