IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No. 1380 of 2011. Date of Decision: 7.7.2011. Ramphal & another .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana & another .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. Ashok Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. NAWAB SINGH.J (ORAL) Challenge is to the order dated February 24th, 2011 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar whereby application filed by prosecution under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for summoning Ramphal and Virender-petitioners as additional accused to face trial in case bearing First Information Report No.367 dated April 6th, 2009 under Sections 323, 324, 326, 506 of Indian Penal Code, Police Station Sadar, Hisar was allowed. 2. On the statement of Ishwar, FIR was registered against Ashish Kumar and others. During investigation of the case, statement of Ashish Kumar was also recorded. He stated that Ram Parvesh and Ishwar, who were co-accused of Ramphal, caused injuries to him with gandasi and dandas and during occurrence, Ramphal and Virneder-petitioners also caused injuries to him. However, charge-sheet was filed against Ishwar and Ram Parvesh. During trial, statement of Ashish Kumar (PW-1) was recorded. He again stated that both the accused caused injuries to him in the alleged occurrence. Learned Additional Sessions Judge, in his order has taken this piece of evidence into consideration and summoned the petitioners to face trial along with their co-accused. 3. It is gratifying to note that learned Additional Sessions Judge was very much alive to the preposition of law and did Criminal Revision No. 1380 of 2011 (2) not act in a mechanical or perfunctory manner. There was proper application of mind and the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C was rightly allowed. 4. There is no scope for interference so, the petition is dismissed. 5. It is recorded for the sake of clarity that the expression of the opinion in this order is only for the limited purpose of disposing of this revision petition and shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. 7.7.2011. (NAWAB SINGH) SN JUDGE