IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 3858 and 3983 of 2010. Decided on : 27.7. 2010, 1. CWP No. 3858 of 2010 Amba Dutt ..Petitioner Vs State of H.P. and Ors. ..Respondents 2. CWP No. 3983 of 2010 Sher Mohd. ..Petitioner Vs. State of H.P. and Ors. .Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mehar Chand, Advocate (in both the petitions). For the respondent(s) Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 3.(in both the petitions) Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.2. (in both the petitions) Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petitions have been filed with the following prayer: CWP No. 3858 of 2010 “That the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the work charge status/regularization to the petitioner w.e.f. the year 2005 with all consequential benefits as per the directions of the Hon’ble Apex Court and as per the policy framed by the State Government in the interest of justice and fair play .” CWP No. 3983 of 2010 “That the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the work charge status/regularization to the petitioner w.e.f. the year 2001 with all consequential benefits as per the directions of the Hon’ble Apex Court and as per the policy framed by the State Government in the interest of justice and fair play .” 2. It is not disputed that the matter is covered by the judgment passed by this Court in CWP(T) No.4161 of 2008, Jagdish Chand and others vs. State of H.P. and another. In case the similarly situated persons have been granted the benefit, the petitioner(s) cannot be discriminated only on the ground, pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) that the Letters Patent Appeal is pending. 2 We dispose of these Writ Petitions directing the first respondent to give the same treatment to the petitioner(s) as the case of the petitioner(s) is covered by Annexure P-2, making it clear that the conferment shall be subject to the outcome of L.P.A. The needful shall be done within one month from the date of production of copy of this judgment alongwith the copy of the aforesaid judgment. 4. With these observations, the writ petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. July 27, 2010. (Justice Kuldip Singh ), (sks/grs) Judge.