3E§5§LE BEM€2§$§ WRIT PETITION (s) No. 51% /2o1o / Mahav1r Ram S/o- Late Shrl Jagtru Ram, Aged:ab0ut 46 years, Presently working as Project Officer— Zila Panchayat— Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, ’ Through— Secretary/Under Secretar‘y, Deptt. of Panchayat and RUIal Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Collector Rajnandgaon D1stt Rajnandgaon Chhattlsgarh Chief Exe‘cutiVe Officer, Zila Panchayat— Rajnandgaon; Distt'.‘ Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS IT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTIO F INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE I NATURE OF MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI ETC CHHATTISGARH PETITIONER WR N O H3GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : B‘LASPUR WRIT PETlTlGN (S) NO. 51 43 OF 2010 _ Mahavir Ram Versus State of Chhattisgarh & 0thers (Wiit Petiiion under Article 226 of the Constitution of india) S§ngie Bench : Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. resent :- Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. P Shri 8hashank Thakur, Panei Lawyer for the State/respondents No.1 & 2. Shri Pawan Kesharwani, Advocate for the respondent No.3, OREER {ORAL} , (Passed on this 26‘ day ofiAugust, 201 1} Heard iearneci counsel for the parties. Despite sufficient opportunities granted to the State respondents, no response has been filed tiii date. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that'there seems to be some discrepancy in the impugned order dated 15.07.2010. Learned counsei further submits ‘ that the State may [be granted iiberty to pass fresh order in administrative exigency and in the pubiic interest. At thisjuncture, iearned counsei for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been reiieved and he is continuing;.at the present piace of posting till date; therefore. his placement should not be disturbed tiii a fresh order is passed by the respondent authorities. No objection from other side. in View of the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of. ' /’ ‘ ' " SW‘ s . 2 PETiTiONER RESPONDENTS