In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh CRM No. M-22530 of 2009 (O&M) Manju Devi ..... Petitioner vs The State of Haryana ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Gorakh Nath, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. Ritu Punj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, who is an accused in FIR No. 13 dated 27.1.2009, registered at Police Station Sector-14, Panchkula, under Sections 395, 412, 120-B IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. She has been falsely implicated mainly on the ground that one of the accused in the present FIR is her brother. Two rings and one chain have been planted on her which has been shown to be recovered from her possession. She is in custody since 16.5.2009. Her earlier bail application bearing CRM No. M-17297 of 2009 was dismissed on 3.7.2009 as at that time the main accused, the brother of the petitioner, Sunil Sirdhania, had not been arrested. Otherwise, there is no direct involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submitted that considering the seriousness of the allegations against the petitioner where recovery of stolen property was made from her, she does not deserve the concession of bail. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner was not named in the FIR and she is in custody since 16.5.2009 and the trial is going to take some time, in my opinion, she deserves the concession of bail pending trial. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner be released on bail pending trial subject to her furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/ Duty Magistrate, Panchkula. The petition stands disposed of. 15.10.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge