IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- Crl. Misc. No. M 33122 of 2009 Date of decision: 27.01.2010 Changez Khan etc. ........ petitioners Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Pardeep Virk, DAG, Haryana for the respondent-State Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the complainant -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Mr. Pardeep Virk, DAG, Haryana, on instructions from SI-Gian Chand states that the entire amount has been deposited by the petitioners. It is also brought to the notice of the Court that petitioner No. 3 has also joined the investigation after returning back to the country. Accordingly, the order dated 25.11.2009 is made absolute qua petitioner No.3 also. Allowed as such. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge January 27, 2010 mohan