SINGLE BENCH ! fl' '^CQ! <i) IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 5J /S-" Of 2006 PETITIONER : y Banshi Lal Sahu S/o Shri Kunj Ram Sahu , aged ,<r^ about 51 .years, Resident .**NV~iY.' ^<0..*-"^;""''..' °f Village Matiya, Post Gurra, Via ..••'^'••' ..••' .^••""^^•V-*''' Bhatapara,DistrictRaipur(CG). cSK-'°..•'•'' ^"y./'"' VBRSUS ^-""^~'<--'" ^y^ ^".^•" ^-' RESPONDENTS •r. -rtle. &^y^e^i 1. Cement Corporation of India C Limited, Through, its Secretary Einployees Contributory Provident Fund Tmst, C.C.I. Office, Core-5 SCOPE Complex , Lodhi Road, New Delhi 1 10003 2. The General Manager, Ceinent Corporation of India Lunited ,Akaltara Cement Factory, Akaltara , District Janjgir Champa (CG). ^^/^J WRITPETITIONUNDERARTICLE 22^/227 OFTHE ^^K^ CO^STITUTION OP INDIA \&^ XI-HC-78 3G[^WvPf, w!{WIG, Rldl+iy ^mdi aww^)^R^>-"<3(^'<:^T 200^ 3TI^T T3^ (I?i^8!<^) an^srwjSara? traT3]l^lsht<]+ ?^<TTWBf?(T3:n^T <t)ll[(-l<fl-f ITTCTI'' if fSvS^Wi ^srf^iTan^T 26.7.2006:- Shri Rakesh Anthony, couns ^l for the petitioner. Heard. The main grievance raised (?y the petitioner in this writ petition is that the petitioner was working |on the post of bags binder in the respondent No.2 factory. On 16-7-2003 the petitioner applied for voluntary retirement and he wa^ ailowed to retire voluntarily. The petitioner requested the responder^s for final setttement of PF dues wde application dated 1-8-2003 and to f}ay the same. When the petitioner did not receive the payment of P.F., h^ sent a telegram. When the petitioner again visited Akaltara Cement Fac^ory, the Manger informed him that DD No.179510 dated 24-1-2004 amoui sent vide letter dated 30 January (iting to Rs. 1,49,593 has already been 2004. On receiving the information, the petitioner met the respondent f^o.2 and said that he has not received the DD as yet. The Manager |informed the CCI vide letter dated 21-5-2004 that the petitioner has| address. On account of gross respondent No.1 the petitioner t\ Respondent No.2 informed the petj DD has been encashed by some be directed to pay an amount of Rs) Learned counsel for the] circumstances, the petitioner may tj respondent No.1 and he be directecj not received the DD due to wrong negtigence and fault on the part of ias not yet received any PF dues. tioner vide letter dated 29-9-2004 that other person namety, Banshilal Sahu against whom Akaltara Factory locjged an FIR at the Police Station, but the amount has not been paid to t^e petitioner. Therefore, respondents 1,49,593/-with interest®18%. petitioner submitted that in the 'e allowed to make a representation to to decide the same. P.T.O. XI-HC-78 3^ ^IMW^, wftww, Kviwy. KWC^I StlNlth WT 200 3TT^?TV^SR (y)I^si<^ff) 3T!^T^r(i-fi+ craTsn^TSiifR? Barve •< ^ ?T(TraT(ri?(T3:n^?T ^ Having heard learned counsejl the facts and circumstances of thel opinion on the merit of the case, the[ the petitioner is just, fair and allcwed to make a detailed represff [petition to respondent No.1 within a| |turn, respondent No.1 is directed Ipetitioner within a period of 60 |representation, after considering all |accordance with law. If respondent| |the amount due to the petitioner has | Ipass order regarding payment, in With the direction aforesaid, Parties are entitled for certifled dafys ^pifepfN'iTTRcif fr'teA'(f^rezK ^Bll^Tsn^T for the petitioner, having regard to case, and without expressing any prayer made by learned counsel for reas|onable. Therefore, the petitioner is isfentation along with a copy of this Iperiod of 10 days from today and in (o decide the representation of the from the date of receipt of the {he points raised by the petitioner, in INo.1 reaches to the conctusion that ]not been paid to him, then he should acdordance with law. ttje petition stands disposed of. copy of this order. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Jiidge P.T.O.