IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 2902 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 2902 OF 200 WRIT PETITION NO. 2902 OF 2007 Nathuram Bajirao Nikam .... Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & ors...... Respondent. Dr. Prakash K. Deshmukh for thepetitioner. Shri R.M.Patne AGP for respondent. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 15TH OCTOBER, 2007 DATED; 15TH OCTOBER, 2007 DATED; 15TH OCTOBER, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The petitioner was proceded against by moving a motion of ‘no confidence’ by serving a notice on Tahasildar. Tahasildar convened the meeting and in the said meeting the motion was carried by requisite majority. The petitioner had attended the meeting. The petitioner filed a dispute before the Collector questioning the passing of ‘no confidence’ motion. The said dispute was rejected and aggreived thereby the petitioner filed an appeal before the Divisional Commissioner and dismissal of the appeal by the Divisional Commissioner has given rise to the filing of the present writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charges levelled against the petitioner in the ‘no confidence’ motion are not established. In the scheme of sec. 35 of B.V.P.Act the charges are not required to be estbalished. In the result there being no merit in the petition the same is summarily dismissed. ....