IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRI. REVISION APPLICATION No 716 of 1998 and 717 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA -------------------------------------------------------------- AMRUTLAL JIVANBHAI PATEL Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: PARTY-IN-PERSON for Petitioner MR SA PANDYA, APP for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA Date of decision: 01/02/99 ORAL JUDGEMENT The applicant, Shri Amrutlal Jivanbhai Patel, the party-in-person is personally present. I have requested him to show the provisions which permit him and his lawyer to argue the appeal before the Court below, but he was not able to show any such provisions. I have suggested him that if he wants to argue the appeal before the Court below, then he ought to have filed the purshis to have his advocate retired, then this Court can direct the Court below to hear him or he can argue the matter through an advocate after giving instructions to the advocate and in turn, the advocate can argue out the matter before the Court below, for which the applicant does not agree. Hence, I have no other alternative except to reject these applications. This application is hereby rejected. .... radhan/