HIGH COURT OF CHHATTBGARH AT BILASPUR D!V!SION BENCH CORAM: HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON’BLE 8HRR SUN“. KUMAR SINHA, J. Writ Appeal No. 234 of 2008 WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 SUB-SECTION (1) OF THE CHHATI'ISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH) ACT. 2006 \ Present : ShriMazad Aii,counseion behalfof Shri Prateek Sharma, counsel for the appellant. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Government Advocate for the State / respondent No.1, Shri YS Thakui‘, counsel for respondent No.2. Shri Anand Dadaria, counsel for respondent No.3. ORDER (17m February, 2009) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Appellant Siyaram Netam has filed lA No.2/2009 for grant of mission to withdraw the writ appeal tiled .by the appellant against \t «i r. K‘ Anpellantl Siyaram Netam, Aged about 53 Respondent No. 3 years, S/o Late Shri Bahur Singh Netam, presentiy working as Dy. Director/Secretary Selection Grade, Upaj Mandi Kurud, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) Versus Bgsgondents 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Agricuiture Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Agriculture, Marketing Boardfi’Raipur (C.G.) Petitioner Shri Narayan Naredia, Sic 0nkar Naredia, Aged about 52 years, presently working as Dy. Director/Secretary Selection Grade, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Bhatapara, District— Raipur (C.G.) the impugned order dated 01.10.2008 passed in WP (S) No.4587i2008. 2) By aliowing IA No.212009, the appellant is granted permission to withdraw the appeal. H” \ 3) \ The appeal, therefore, ls dismissed as withdrawn/./ my; //sa/ ha Judggsuce ‘\ S‘mii Kumar Sm \l padma /J“gg:A/,,(/«