BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Thirtieth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.13189 of 2011 V. JOTHIMANI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY:: THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLCIE VADAMADURAI POLICE STASTION, CR NO. 378/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. M.MUTHUGEETHAYAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. A. RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as an accused and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 17.09.2011 for the alleged offence punishable under Section 3(1) of the TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.378 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 16.09.2011 and the overt act attributed against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the other caused damage a car, bearing Registration No.TN 57 P 9555, which is belonging to the opposite political party and no such occurrence has been taken place. He further submitted that because of the political vendor, a false case has been foisted against him and hence, he prays for enlargement on bail. 3. Refuting the same, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner along with other caused damage a car bearing Registration No.TN 57 P 9555, and the value of the damaged is worth about Rs.15,000/-. He further submitted that the investigation https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the alleged occurrence has been taken place on 16.09.2011 at 10.00 p.m. and the petitioner and another have alleged to be caused damage a car, bearing Registration No.TN 57 P 9555 and the value of the damaged is worth about Rs.15,000/- and the investigation is considerably over, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to the following stringent conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) to the credit of Crime No.378 of 2011 before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasanthur; ii) On such deposits the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasanthur ; and iii) The petitioner shall report before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasanthur, daily at 10.30. a.m. until further orders. sd/- 30/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VADASANTHUR 2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLCIE VADAMADURAI POLICE STATION,DINDIGUL DISTRICT 5 THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, SUB JAIL, DINDIGUL 1. CC to M/S. M.MUTHUGEETHAYAN Advocate SR.No.34295: DM::2011:OCTOBER:::03:: ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13189 of 2011 2P;7C:: Date :30/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/