IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 2009 SHRI. C. H. RAMAYYA CHINTALA ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. BASURAJ GANAHALU AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. Aldrin Monteiro, Adv. for the appellant. Coram:- C. L. PANGARKAR, J. Date:- 29th January, 2009 P.C. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. The respondent is present in person, who is identified by the counsel for the appellant. Respondent/complainant states that he has received amount of Rs.30,000/- towards full and final settlement of the claim against the appellant/accused. In view of the fact that the respondent states that he has received the amount of Rs.30,000/- towards full and final settlement, he states that he does not want to prosecute the complaint any further. In view of the fact that the complainant does not want to prosecute the complaint, the conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act is set aside. The accused stands acquitted. If he is in custody, he be released forthwith. Authenticated copy of this order be supplied to the parties. C. L. PANGARKAR, J. PZC