IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12402 of 2011 Rajesh Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03/ 18.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is husband of the deceased. As per prosecution case, marriage of the petitioner had taken place in the year 2008 and, admittedly, deceased died within seven yeas of her marriage at the house of the petitioner in other than normal circumstance. In post mortem examination, it was found that deceased died on account of poisoning. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that according to the prosecution case itself, informant got information from the petitioner and having got the aforesaid information, he came at the house of the petitioner and after that he lodged the present case and, therefore, aforesaid conduct of the petitioner shows his innocence. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Puroshottampur P.S. Case no. 5/2009 pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah stands rejected. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah shall commit the case of the petitioner to the court of sessions in accordance with law within one month from the date of receipt of this order. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)