R.S.A.No.2542 OF 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.2542 OF 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 6 th APRIL, 2011 Rajinder Pal .... Appellant Versus Lakhmi Chand .... Respondent CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Surinder Dagar, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Navneet Singh, Advocate for the respondent. Respondent also in person. * * * * L.N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL) With the intervention of the court, parties have arrived at compromise in this second appeal. Joint statement of counsel for the appellant and the respondent-plaintiff in person has been recorded separately, regarding the compromise. The said statement is reproduced hereunder: “Stated that with intervention of the Court, the parties have effected compromise. In view of compromise, the appellant-defendant shall pay lump sum amount of Rs.6,77,000/- to the plaintiff-respondent within three months from today either directly or by depositing in the trial court. The said amount has been arrived at as under: Principal amount : 3,00,000 Interest since date of advancement till filing of the suit @ 2% per month : 2,16,000 (approx. ) R.S.A.No.2542 OF 2009 -2- Interest from date of filing of suit till date of decision of trial court @ 9% per annum on principal amount of Rs.3,00,000/- : 76,500 (approx. ) Future interest from the date of decision of trial court till 06.07.2011 @ 6% per annum on principal amount of Rs.3,00,000/- : 48,000 (approx. ) Cost of the suit : 36,422 Total : 6,76,922 Rounded of to Rs.6,77,000/- If the appellant fails to pay the aforesaid amount within the stipulated period, the instant second appeal shall be deemed to have been dismissed. Since appeal has been compromised with intervention of the Court, Court fee paid for the instant second appeal be refunded to the appellant. The appeal be disposed of accordingly.” The case has thus been lawfully compromised. In view of compromise, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the above statement, which shall also form part of the decree sheet. Since appeal has been compromised with intervention of the Court, Court fee paid for the instant second appeal be refunded to the appellant. (L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE 6th April, 2011 'raj'