HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY Contempt Case No.778 of 2010 Date: July 2, 2010 Between: M. Savithri, D/o.Bhoomaiah, aged about 22 years, Occ: Field Assistant, O/o. Grama Panchayat, Bujuranpally, Shankarampet (A) Mandal, Medak District … Petitioner And Sri Suresh Kumar, District Collector, Medak District, at Sanga Reddy, and 3 others … Respondents Order: Non-compliance of order dated 22-04-2010, passed by this court in W.P.No.9205 of 2010, by the respondents, is the complaint in this contempt case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. In the writ petition, it was the grievance of the petitioner that though she was appointed as Field Assistant and her appointment was in force, she was not being allowed to function as such. This court, by order dated 22-04-2010, while issuing notice before admission, directed that if the appointment of the petitioner was in force as on the date of passing of the order, she shall be allowed to function as Field Assistant on the same terms and conditions of appointment. In this contempt case, third respondent-Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Shankarampet(A) Mandal, Medak District, has filed counter affidavit on behalf of respondents. It is stated in the counter affidavit that in compliance of the order of this court dated 22-04-2010, proceedings No.EGS/2/2010, dated 23-06-2010 were issued directing the petitioner to report to her duties, pursuant to which she has reported to her duties and is being continued as Field Assistant. Though there was some delay on the part of the respondents in complying the directions of this court, fact remains that the directions of this court in the order dated 22-04-2010 have been complied with by the respondents and to that effect proceedings dated 23-06-2010 have been issued, as evident from the counter affidavit, and the petitioner is being continued as Field Assistant. In that view of the matter, this court is of the view, it is not a fit case to proceed further under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The contempt case is accordingly closed. ____________________ (R. SUBHASH REDDY, J) July 2, 2010 MRR