1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEPT PETITION NO. 93 OF 2009 _______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office } Memoranda of Coram, } Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's } orders or directions } and Registrar's orders } ___________________________}___________________________________ Mr.S. M. Vibhute, Advocate for contempt petitioner. Mr.Amol Gandhi, Advocate for respondent nos.1 to 5. ...... [ CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. ] DATE : 13th January, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Counsel extensively. By virtue of the orders in Appeal From Order No.83/2006 with Civil Application No.10363/2006, dated 26th February, 2007, this Court directed that the parties shall maintain status-quo regarding the suit property pending adjudication of the application for temporary injunction. 2. The petitioner Amitkumar contemplates, the said order of maintaining status-quo is violated as the land is 2 attempted to be developed by bringing J.C.b. machine and board of Amitkumar is tried to be disturbed. 3. The disturbance to the Board obviously IS an eye wash as on page No.30, photographs, tendered by Mr.Amitkumar, display existence of such board. The removal of some bushes, inadvertently if carried will not be causing disturbance or violation of the orders of maintaining status-quo. 4. The learned Senior Counsel tendered two photographs to demonstrate, the land was as plain as earlier, and there is no construction, development made/effected by alleged contemnors. 5. During course of submission, he has also tendered the report dated 26.05.2009 to the Tahsildar by the Chief Officer, Nagar Parishad, Kinwat, which illustrated, at land survey nos.226 and 227, on inspection, there was no construction effected. 6. Taking these aspects into consideration, it is obvious, there is no violation or breach of terms of order of this 3 Court referred above. Nothing survives in the petition, hence disposed of. 7. The learned Judge, seized with the injunction application, shall decide the same expeditiously up to 23rd February, 2010. [K.U.CHANDIWAL ] JUDGE gas/CP93.09