SB Crlmb No.5215/10. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B.CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO.5215/2010. Rajesh @ Chirkoot Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 28/5/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri S.R. Choudhary for Shri Mohar Pal Meena for the petitioner. Shri Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor for State. ****** Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was initially arrested on 28/12/2009 in FIR No.261/2009 PS Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur and on the same day, his arrest was also shown in other two cases in FIR Nos.264/2009 and 270/2009. Except these three cases, there is no other case registered against the petitioner. Investigation has been completed, the challan has already been filed and the trial of the case will take some considerable long time. Co-accused persons namely; Vijendra Singh, Balram, Hemraj @ Tinda, Mahesh Dhobi and Jeetu @ Jitendra have already been enlarged on bail by the orders of the co-ordinate Bench of this Court respectively dated 14/10/2009, 19/1/2010, 19/1/2010, 23/2/2010 and 19/1/2010. SB Crlmb No.5215/10. 2 Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Considering the submissions made at the bar, the nature of accusation, the materials on record and all other facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. In the result, this bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Rajesh @ Chirkoot S/o Om Prakash Dhobi shall be released on bail in FIR No.264/2009 P.S. Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur City (South) Jaipur for offence u/Ss.457 and 380 IPC on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing until conclusion of the trial with the stipulation that he shall not repeat such offence in future and in case, he is again found committing similar offence, prosecution will be at liberty to apply for cancellation of his bail on this ground alone. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. anil