IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.21290 of 2011 Date of Decision.17.11.2011 M/s Satgur Foods Dhuri Road Malerkotla, District Sangrur through its proprietor Pawan Kumar Yakhmi .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the writ petition is to be considered as representation and appropriate decision is taken by respondent No.2 in the light of order passed by this Court in Annexure P-3 within a reasonable time. 2. The writ petition may be treated as representation and a decision shall be taken by respondent No.2 within 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order in the light of order passed by this Court under Annexure P-3. 3. The writ petition is disposed of as above. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE November 17, 2011 Pankaj*