IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI FRIDAY, THE 2ND MAY 2008 / 12TH VAISAKHA 1930 WP(C).No. 13866 of 2008(A) -------------------------- OS.112/2008 of MUNSIFF COURT, MAVELIKKARA .................... PETITIONER: ------------------- MAHILAMANI, KAVALLOTHIL, KIZHAKKE VAZHI MURI, MAVELIKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.R.KRISHNA RAJ RESPONDENTS: ------------------------- 1. JAYASREE, KAVALLOTHIL, KIZHAKKEVAZHI MURI, MAVELIKKARA. 2. PANKAJAKSHI, KAVALLOTHIL, KIZHAKKEVAZHI MURI, MAVELIKKARA. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/05/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Kss V.GIRI,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No.13866 of 2008 -------------------------- Dated this the 2nd May, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner who is one of the plaintiffs in O.S. 112 of 2008 of the Munsiff's Court, Mavelikara filed an application for an injunction restraining the defendants from making any construction in the disputed property. He also moved an application for temporary injunction as I.A. 773 of 2008. Petitioner submits that in spite of an emergent motion made and in spite of the fact that the Commissioner has filed a report, the court below had adjourned the case to 28.5.2008. Hence the writ petition. In my view, it is open to the petitioner to move the vacation court. namely, the District Court, Alappuzha for appropriate orders in I.A. 773 of 2008 If motion is made in that behalf by the petitioner, after due notice to the defendants, the Vacation Judge, Alappuzha shall pass an ad interim order on the application for injunction within 10 days from the date of moving such application before the Vacation Judge. Subject to this, the writ petition is disposed of. (V.GIRI, JUDGE) ma K.THANKAPPAN,J CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999 ORDER 25th May, 2007 Common issues are raised for consideration in all these writ petitions. Reference is made to the facts in Writ Petition No.4562/2008 for the sake of convenience.