IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2011 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1932 RP.No. 121 of 2011(P) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.34342/2010 Dated 15/11/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ----------------------------------- SALAHUDEEN ABDULRASHEED, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.FATHIMA BEEVI, VARVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, KARIBINTHODY, KURAKKODU, KULLAYIL P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.R.SIVAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE PASSPORT OFFICER, REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001. 2. THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION KOCHI BRANCH REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE (CBI ACB), COCHIN, PIN-682 016. 3. THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT REP.BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI, THROUGH THE ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, COCHIN, PIN-682 035. ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR FOR R-1 SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHARAN PILLAI, SC, CBI THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ R.P.No.121 OF 2011 IN W.P.(C) NO. 34342 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 18th day of March, 2011 O R D E R Review of the judgment is sought only on the ground that the 1st respondent has not so far passed any order as directed in the judgment for the reason that this court did not specify any time limit for passing such order. 2. Having gone through the judgment, I find merit in the submission made. 3. Therefore, I direct that, in modification of the directions contained in the judgment in WP(C) No.34342/2010, the 1st respondent shall pass orders as directed therein at any rate within 4 weeks of production of a copy of this order. Review petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp