IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.KOSHY & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA FRIDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2008 / 28TH POUSHA 1929 WA.No. 154 of 2008() -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.15909/2003 Dated 30/11/2007 .................... APPELLANT: PETITIONER --------------------- VARGHESE THUNDIYIL THUNDIYIL HOUSE, MULLAKKAL, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.M.RAJASEKHARAN NAYAR SMT.K.N.RAJANI SMT.ANILA PETER RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ALAPPUZHA. 2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY) AMBALAPPUZHA TALUK.ALAPPUZHA. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (AGRICULTURE) ALAPPUZHA. BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.MEERA THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J.B.KOSHY & K.HEMA,JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.A.No.154 OF 2008 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT Koshy, J. The learned Single Judge directed the District Collector to decide the matter finally and pass fresh orders. Thereafter only recovery can be made. The contention of the appellant is that since there are some observations and findings against him, it will go against him. On going through the judgment, it can be seen that the learned Single Judge only mentioned about the contentions of the respondent. In the above circumstances , we direct that the District Collector shall consider the entire matter and dispose of the same untrammelled by any of the observations made by the learned Single Judge. The Writ Appeal is disposed of as above. J.B.KOSHY, JUDGE K.HEMA, JUDGE vgs.