IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2815 of 2008 ============================================= Jai Babu Sao .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ============================================= Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Chandra Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Ga4) ============================================= 6 23-11-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties. The contempt application arises out of an interim order restraining demolition. Subsequently the writ petition itself has been disposed on 15.12.2010. A copy of the order has been placed. Neither of the parties appear to have raised any issue with regard to any demolition done during the pendency of the proceedings at the time of final disposal. It being a question of fact, no further enquiry in the contempt jurisdiction is possible if the petitioner did not raise it appropriately in the final hearing of the writ petition. The Court is informed that pursuant to the final order in the writ petition, therefore proceedings have been initiated under the Public Land Encroachment Act and which has been questioned by the petitioner in a fresh writ application pending before the Court. The contempt application is disposed. Krishna Chandra Jha/- (Navin Sinha, J)