IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 10352 of 2000 Between: National Mazdoor Union, A.P.S.R.T.C Dharmavaram Depot, Rep by its Depot Secretary B.Muthyalappa, S/o. Late B.Narasappa. R/o. D.No.16/2359-1, Near RTC Bus Station, Dharmavaram Depot. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 A.P.S.R.T.C. Rep by its The Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad 2 A.P.S.R.T.C. Rep by its The Regional Manager. Anantapur. 3 A.P.S.R.T.C. Rep by its The Depot Manager, Dharmavaram. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction more in the nature of a Writ of "CERTIORARI" setting aside the proceedings No.P3/781(2)/2000-DVRM of the 3rd Resdpondent dt.27.5.2000 being arbitrary, illegal and A.P.S.R.T.C. C.C.A. Regulations 1963 and the provisions of the Industrial Disputes ACt and Consequently direct the respondent to refund the amount deducted from the salaries of the members of the petitioners Union pursuant to the above said proceedings opf the 3rd Respondent and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:SMT.M.BHASKARA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.W.V.S.RAJESWARI The Court made the following : ORDER : The petitioner filed this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of Certiorari to set aside the proceedings No.P3/781(2)/2000-DVRM, dated 27.05.2000 of Respondent No.3being arbitrary, illegal and violative and consequently to direct the respondents to refund the amounts deducted from the salaries of the members of the petitioner union. 2. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that despite her letter to the petitioners herein, she did not receive any instructions. Further the standing counsel for A.P.State Road Transport Corporation brought to the notice of this Court that similar writ petitions in W.P. No.1744 of 2001, W.P.No.2322 of 2000 and W.P. No.26323 of 2000 were dismissed by this Court on the ground that the said writ petitions have become infructuous. Having considered the said submissions of both the counsel and the point involved in this writ petition is akin to those writ petitions, this petition is liable to be dismissed as infructuous. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. _________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J Dated June 24, 2009 KSH