IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 16865 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 20th September, 2010. Dildar Singh & Anr. Petitioners through Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate Versus Food Corporation of India & Ors. Respondents through Mr. Ravi Kant Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL] Notice of motion. Mr. Ravi Kant Sharma, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Keeping in view the nature of relief claimed in the writ petition, there is no necessity to seek any reply/affidavit from the respondents at this stage. The petitioners challenge the action of the respondents in not deploying them as Security Guards to meet the requirements and instead deploying Home Guard personnel and persons from other sources, being illegal and without jurisdiction. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation [Annexure P-8] submitted by the petitioners, in accordance with law/policy, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of one month from date a certified copy of this order is received, Disposed of. Dasti. September 20, 2010. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE