IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD JANUARY 2008 / 13TH POUSHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 1780 of 2007(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.12620/2006 Dated 17/10/2007 .................... PETITIONER -------------- JOY SEBASTIAN, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O DEVASIA, THELLIKALYIL HOUSE, KANDAMANGALAM P.O., MANNARKKAD COLLEGE(VIA), PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.K.RAMAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: ------------- P.V.GOVINDANUNNI, AGED 54, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.A.G.ANEETHA THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Contempt of Court Case No. 1780 of 2007-S in W.P.(C) No.12620 of 2006 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 3rd day of January, 2008 J U D G M E N T This contempt of court case is filed on the basis of Annexure A1 judgment. The direction therein was to consider Ext.P3. This Court had not issued any specific direction as to how Ext.P3 has to be considered. Now, Annexure A5 has been issued by the respondent after considering Ext.P3. Certain reasons have been stated in Annexure A5 and conclusion has been arrived at. The petitioner is aggrieved by the same. It is open to the petitioner to challenge the same, according to law, before the competent authority. However, that is no ground to proceed with the action under the C.O.C Act. Hence, this case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge Ext.A5 before the competent authority, in accordance with law. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge ms