1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12110 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Mr. Vivek Bhavthankar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Deo, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI,J. DATE : 14th December, 2009 PER COURT : 1. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that vide order dated 9th October, 2007, this court had granted stay to that part of the order impugned in the petition, which directs payment of back waves, but, however, the prayer for reinstatement was specifically rejected. 2. It is submitted that the applicant was reinstated on 2nd September, 2008 and again terminated on 2nd May, 2009. 3. Shri Deo, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the subsequent termination is on the ground that approval is not granted to the appointment of the applicant. 4. The basic responsibility to make payment of 2 salary is on the management. When this court has specifically refused the prayer for reinstatement, the respondents were bound to continue the present applicant. A mere farce cannot be made of complying the orders passed by this court, by allowing the employee to join and then to terminate him. 5. In that view of the matter, interim relief granted to the extent of stay to the payment of back wages is concerned, the same stands vacated. 6. The civil application is allowed. [B.R. GAVAI,J.] grt/-