1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2006 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.1452 OF 2007 Soham Estates .... Plaintiffs. V/s Smt Vedkumari Mohanlal Raizda and others ..... Defendants. Ms. Nina Kapadia i/b Pandya Gandhi & Co. for plaintiffs. Mr. Viren Shetty i/b DSK Legal for defendant Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM: V. M. KANADE, J. DATE : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2010 P.C.:- 1. By order dated 18/06/2007, this Court was pleased to record the statement made by Counsel for defendant Nos. 1 2, and 3 and has stated that the said statement shall continue till disposal of the notice of motion. As recorded in the said order, the Plaintiffs had submitted that instead of order of status-quo, the relief in terms of prayer clause (b) of the motion be granted. The learned Judge, however, has clarified as to what the order of status quo would mean. 2. In my view, Plaintiffs are adequately protected by the interim order and also in view of the statement made by 2 Defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 3. During the pendency of the suit, the said interim order shall continue. 3. Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed of. (V.M. KANADE, J.)