BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Tenth day of June Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.S.RAMANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.6770 of 2011 1 P.SIVAKUMAR 2 A.KUMAR 3 MURUGAN ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 3 Vs. STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, AUNDIPATTI, THENI DISTRICT. CR.NO.9/2011 ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S. P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 448, 427, 294(b) and 506(ii) I.P.C. and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act in Crime No.9 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the first petitioner is the husband of the de-facto complainant and the second and third petitioner are the relative and friend of the first petitioner. He further submitted that a complaint was given by the wife of the first petitioner containing false allegation. He further submitted that the marriage took place in the year 2002 and two children were born to the first petitioner and the de-facto complainant and due to the family dispute, this case is filed. 3.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that the de-facto complainant is the wife of the first petitioner and the first petitioner demanded dowry and also caused damage to the property of the de-facto complainant. 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the first petitioner is the wife of the de- https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ facto complainant and the marriage took place in the year 2002 and due to the family dispute, the de-facto complainant's property was damaged by the first petitioner and the petitioners 2 and 3 are the relative and friend of the first petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aundipatti and the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. For a period of four weeks and the petitioners 2 and 3 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 10/06/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AUNDIPATTI. 2 -Do-Thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION AUNDIPATTI, THENI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S. P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate SR.No.17981 akm/14.06.11 /2p-6c/ ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.6770 of 2011 Date :10/06/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/