WP(C) 6844/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA Heard Mr. R. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. A.M. Buzarbaruah, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.7 to 14. This writ petition has been filed challenging the legality and/or validi ty of the Annexure-8 letter dated 20.12.2010 issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Barpeta, directing Anchalik Panchayat to convene the meeting to discuss the no c onfidence motion against the President of 99 No. Bahmura Gaon Panchayat. As per the said letter, the meeting was to be convened on 24.12.2010 at 11 A.M. According to the petitioner, the earlier no confidence motion sought to be enforced against the President of the said Gaon Panchayat, having been interf ered with by this Court being WP(C) No.5779/2010, there cannot be another no con fidence motion in terms of Section 15 of the Assam Panchayat Act. The said earli er writ petition, was filed by the petitioner alleging non-adherence to the time schedule for bringing the no confidence motion as envisaged under Section 15 of the Act. It is not the case of failure of the no confidence motion itself so as to attract the proviso to Section 15(5) according to which in case of a no conf idence motion being lost, there cannot be another no confidence motion within ne xt 6(six) months. Irrespective of disposal of the aforesaid writ petition interfering with the move for no confidence motion on technical ground, it is always for the mem bers of the Gaon Panchayat to bring no confidence motion. Mr. Buzarbaruah, learned counsel for the private respondents submits tha t in fact in terms of the interim order passed by this Court, no confidence moti on has already been made but the results have not been declared in terms of the said interim order. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed. The respondents wi ll be at liberty to declare the no confidence motion results. Interim order operating in this proceeding, stands vacated.