c^» SingteBench IfrLTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(C) No. (-IHL(9 / 2011 PETITIONER ^^. ^^^•^ w .-•••' . ;^<.^ .^"..<14' 1 '^.- "^•" RESPONDENTS Rukhmani Mahila Swa sahayata Samuh Shop no. 539A, Sector 6 B Market Bhilai- Nagar Durg (CG). Through- The President Smt. Meena Devi W/o Shri Radheshyam Yadaw, Aged about 38 years R/o Near Puri ITI Ward 7 Kohka Bhilai Durg (CG). VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary, Department ofdvil Supplies Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur(C.G.). 2.The Collector (Food), Collectorate Building Durg Distt. Durg (CG) -?. The Controller Food, Collectorate Building Durg Distt. Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAIVIUS. 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER. Particulars are same as above in the cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS. Particulars are same as above in the cause title. Ajmt mOH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPLTR PETmONER RESPONDENTS WR1T PETmON_(ClNp.,4449_oI2011 Rukhmani Mahila Swa Sahayata S BhilaiDurg(CG) VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PE1THON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUrnON OF IND1A SB: Hon'ble SIiri Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Stiri Vipin Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Deputy Advoeate General 2. (Passed on 09U1 day ofAugust, 2011) By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the application dated 08.02.2007 (Aimexure P/2) within a stipulated period. Shri Tiwari, leanied counsel appeaiing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had filed an application on 08.02.2007 (Annexure P/2) for allotment ofa fair price shop, but tlie same has not been decided even after lapse ofmore than four years. In view of the above, the respondent authorities are directed to coasider and dispose of the appiication of the petitioner for ailotmeat of fair price shop in accordaiice with law, rules and regulations, within a period oftwo months fromthe date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid direction. No order as to costs, Sat Judge