In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CRM.M- 30151 of 2009 Decided on Oct 28,2009. Poonam and others -- Petitioners vs. State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Rakesh Kumar Dhiman, Advocate,for the petitioners Rakesh Kumar Jain, J: This is a petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'Cr.P.C.'), for anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 410 dated 30.7.2009, registered under Sections 304-B, 34 IPC, at Police Station, Jhajjar. Learned counsel for the petitioners,interalia, submitted that the petitioners are the real sisters of the husband of the deceased Sonia and have no concern with the commission of the alleged offence as they are residing separately in their matrimonial homes situated at different places. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the petitioners had earlier filed bail application before the Court below which was dismissed by learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Jhajjar, vide his order dated 10.10.2009 in which he had observed that the matter was enquired by the S.P.(Jhajjar) who after finding sufficient material CRM.M- 30151 of 2009 -2- against the petitioners ordered for their arrest. Deceased Sonia was set on fire within a period of seven years of her marriage for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. Therefore, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail . Hence, this bail petition is hereby dismissed. It is, however, made clear that nothing observed herein shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merit of the case. Oct 28,2009 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge