HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR @ Second Appeal No. 359/2004 tSECOND APPFAI. UNDER sECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL iPROCEIwIuI (SB :Hon’ble Mr.'T.P.Sha:ma, J.) x Present? Shn' Shree Kumar Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Witli Shri Vimlesh ’ Bajpai, Advocate for the appeuants. ‘ Shri U‘.K. S. Chandel, P.L. for the State] respondent No, 3. ‘ None for the respondents No. 1 & 2. I a I I t H H ORAL« JUDGEMENT (Passed on 12/11/2010) t t 1. By this second appeal pgder Section 100 of the C.P.C. appellants have challenged the legahty and propnety of the Judgment and ’ 3 decree 12/3] 2004 passed b First Additional Dlsmct Judge Baloda y , Bzar Dlsmct Ralpur 111 c1v11 appeal No. 28-A/ 2003. a ’ APPELLANTS » Sunabai Aged 45 years, wd/o PLAINTIFFS Gourishankar Kanvv'ar Saroj Aged 34 years; S]o Gourishankar Kanwar 3. Manoj Knmar aged 31 years S/o Gourishankar Kanwar 4. Mankunwar aged 41 years, D/o Gourishankar Kanwar 5. Ku. Sunita aged 28 years, D/o u . Gomishankar Kanwar. ’6. Ku. Kamala Aged 21 years D/o i Gourishankar Kanwar. 1 All appellants R/o Village Kashdol Tahsil Kashdol, Dista'ct Raipur (C.G.). Versus RESPONDENTS DEFENDANTS ‘ 1. Shlvshankar Aged 45 years, S/o Hetram Kanwar R/o Vlllage Nandmya, Tahs11 Kashdol, Disti‘ict Raipur (C.G.). I 2. Vijay Kumar S/o Bishnuprasad ‘1. Pajkra, Aged 45 years, R/o Village Kashdol, Tahsil 'Kashdo], District Raipur(C.G.). State' of Chhattisgarh through Collector, Raipur Disuict Raipur (C,G.). { 1 1 l } \ nl‘ the ourse of rgnt learned counsel for the appiénts sbits hat he seeks to withdraw this secod appeal wit liberty o fi approrte suit for possession appeal befoxe the Revee le pia and nu hony if advice A t't so Payr is lowed. re al nsequenty, this second appeal is dismissed as widwn with Col thra Dju‘ig c aume el mm t n h t aforesaid liberty. J ‘ . ‘ \ No order as‘to costs. 5 sev— . T’ P' Shafma’ \ Judge ‘