IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Misc. No.M-24168 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 7.9.2009. Smt. Paramjit Kaur ....Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present:- Mr. J.S. Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mehardeep Singh, DAG Punjab. RAJESH BINDAL J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner did not have any direct dealing with the complainant regarding the property in dispute. She had transferred the property in the name of Rajwinder Singh son of Lachhman Singh with whom she had married. In case in the revenue record more share has been transferred in the name of Rajwinder Singh than what was owned by the petitioner, the complainant is not affected by that. The dispute in the present case is claimed to be Civil in nature. For that reliance has been placed on the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Devendra and Others Vs. State of Uttar Pardesh and another, (2009) 7 Supreme Court cases 495. It was further submitted that co-accused namely Rajwinder Singh was arrested and has already been released on regular bail. Learned counsel for the respondent/State submitted that the petitioner in fact had cheated even her minor son Balbit Singh as after the death of her first husband she got transferred the property in her own name without getting the name of her minor son mentioned therein and thereafter the same was transferred by way of sale deed in favour of second husband. The case for cheating is clearly made out. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and without commenting on the merit thereof as the same as the same may effect the case of either of the parties and considering the fact that the co-accused in the present case was arrested and has already been released on bail, it is directed that in case the petitioner is sought to be arrest in the present case she shall be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. She shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for investigation. She shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition is disposed of. (RAJESH BINDAL) 7.9.2009 JUDGE Reema