IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD FEBRUARY 2011 / 4TH PHALGUNA 1932 WP(C).No. 4385 of 2011(W) ------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- MATHEWS MATHEW, S/O.LATE J.P.MATHEW, NEDUMCHIRA PUTHEN VEEDU, KAITHAKUSHY, ADICHANALLOOR P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. MR. P.HARIDAS MS. S.SIKKY RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM - 691001 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, KOLLAM - 691001 3. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND ACQUISITION, KOLLAM - 691001 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P. N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No. 4385 OF 2011 ......................................................................... Dated this the 23rd February , 2011 J U D G M E N T The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the grievance projected in the writ petition with reference to the alleged mistake in the survey number, has already been sought to be redressed by filing Ext. P5 application before the second respondent (produced along with I.A.No. 3030 of 2011 ) and that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is given to the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on it, in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well . 3. In view of the submission made as aforesaid, this Court does not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5 in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, W.P.(C) No. 4385 OF 2011 2 within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with copies of the writ petition and the I.A. before the second respondent for further steps. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk