HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.22124 of 2010 Date : 27-10-2010 Between : Syed Waheeduddin s/o.late Mir Kazim Ali .. Petitioner And The Sub-Registrar, Vanasthalipuram, Ranga Reddy District and another .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri K.K. Waghray Counsel for respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of the respondent in refusing to register Agreement of Sale- cum-General Power of Attorney in favour of Sri Kamishetti Ramulu s/o.Kamishetti Laxmaiah in respect of land admeasuring 215 sq. yards in S.No.318 of Rangannaguda, Turkyamjal village as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Sections 32 and 34 of Registration Act, 1908 (for short, “the Act”). In response to the notice issued by this Court, respondent No.1 filed a counter affidavit wherein it is inter alia stated that the Tahsildar, Hayathnagar in his letter dated 7-5-2010 addressed to the Revenue Divisional officer, Ranga Reddy East Division, requested to cancel the succession order dated -03-2009 and pattadar pass books and title deeds issued in favour of the legal representatives of late Mir Khazim Ali and that in pursuance of the said request, the Revenue Divisional Officer issued proceedings dated 4-6-2010 cancelling the succession granted by the Tahsildar and pattadar pass books and the title deeds. Copies of these proceedings are filed along with the counter affidavit. Sri K.K. Waghray, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that till now his client has not officially received the above mentioned proceedings. In my opinion, when the very proceedings by which succession in favour of the petitioner was granted and the pattadar pass books and the title deeds relating to the property in question were cancelled, till he succeeds in setting aside those proceedings, the petitioner cannot claim to be the lawful owner of the property in question. Therefore, no writ of mandamus can be issued to the respondents to register the Agreement of Sale-cum-General Power of Attorney to be presented by the petitioner. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to question the above mentioned proceedings before the competent court. The right of the petitioner to get the documents registered will depend upon the result of the litigation that ay be initiated by the petitioner. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.28183/2010 is disposed of as infructuous. _____________________ C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy.,J Date : 27-10-2010 AM