IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.12335 of 2008 MD.ANISH @ DULARE---------Petitioner Versus 1. STATE OF BIHAR 2. NEAKHAT PARVEEN ---------Opp.Parties ----------- 3. 22.7.2008 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as well as the learned counsel for opposite party no.2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.544 of 2007 (Tr. No.1682 of 2007) for the alleged offences registered under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the present complaint has been filed on account of certain ill-advice. As a matter of fact, the petitioner is ready to live with the complainant amicably and peacefully. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no.2 submits that opposite party no.2 is also eager to live with the petitioner. Thus, it is jointly submitted that both the parties shall take appropriate steps. Considering the submissions, as noticed above, and on perusal of the 2 allegations made in the complaint, it is directed that the petitioner Md. Anish @ Dulare, in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No.544 of 2007, Tr. No.1682 of 2007, within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West Muzaffarpur, in connection with the aforesaid case, on the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is made clear that in case the petitioner fails to take appropriate steps for keeping opposite party no.2, as submitted earlier, it will be open for opposite party no.2 to take steps for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)