c^^^— x IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISHGARH AT BILASPURfC.G.t W.P.(S)No. tA'SX^- /2010 Petitioner .< ^e^ ^^?/' 1. Raja Ram Sahu aged 48 years, son of late Shri Balaram Sahu Pradhan Pathak, Primary School, Udan, Block- Chhuikhadan, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 2. Parmanand Sahu, Aged52years S/0 Shri Shobha Ram Sahu , Head Master, Govt. Primary School Majgaon, Block Chhuikhadan, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus /^ A-^ /d'y.^'. i(<^ \%Y^l '~-ov Respondents ^1. The State GovtofChhattishgarh, Through the Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) ^ 2. District Education Officer, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Chhuikhadan, Distt. Rajnandgaon Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of writ of Mandamus/direction or anv other ^/ aDDropriate writ. OLH T 3H^T -^r ^^J4) TT^ff ^TT^T 9FIW ir ^•' ^wvn «»*iicn ~3~sr T^l^l<yl^, e>fl1-y<|(o, [®ldl-y(jl,< _. ^f^^^. Lis^h^_ ^^...........—/...........................,.^^^Q ^TI^TTR^:T (<jqf^<^T) ^TORTrf^T 3?TT^Y So:hOnu!eShi{iV$an8udi<tjviui .liiiStMivabi.dyek.j; 1S-08»2Q1Q Shri Ajay Shrivastava, coun: ?v1s. Srnita Ghai, Panei Law^ Learneci counsei for the passed D.Ed examination at their they are also entitled to the bene| order dated 772/07 passed in W.P. Learned State counsel petitioners ought to have appr<| fvpreaentatjon. It -is submitted tha shaii be considered in accordancel in view of submissions rnal iibeity to the petltioners to rnake| above. On such representation i1 of the petitioners in accordance taken within a period ofSmonths With the aforesaiu obsei-vat hr 'Rm^if ^f fs^T <P>«^i< ^»'3ffiW3?TT^T ^el for the petitioners. <er for respondents on advance copy- pe|;itioners submits that the petitloners have own costs while In service and therefore Its of two advance incrernente, in v1ew of (s) No.690/07 and batoh of matters. su^mits that if the petitloners claim parlty, jiacl-i^the State Gov-ernment by maklng if such representation is made, the sarne ^with ia-w. ie, this petltlon Is finally disposed off with representation ciaimingbenefit as stated |iade, respondents shall examine the ciaim mh law and appropriate decision shail be rorn the date of receipt of representation. |ons, the petition is.finaliy disposed ofr. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ^,;:^ . Judge 1