1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD).No.3033 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 L. Muthu Mariappan : Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Collectorate, Tirunelveli. 2.The Personal Assistant (General), To Collector, Collectorate, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Tahsildar, Ambasamudram Taluk, Taluk Office, Tirunelveli District. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned suspension order in A4/46030/10, dated 08.07.2010 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently, to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in his service with all service benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondents : Mr.V.Rajasekaran, Special Government Pleader O R D E R Mr.V.Rajasekaran, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. I have heard Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.V.Rajasekaran, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. The petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present Writ Petition challenging the order of suspension of the second respondent dated 08.07.2010. 4. The order of suspension cannot be revoked by this Court, while exercising the power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It is only for the authority concerned to revoke the order of suspension, if the authority feels that the order of suspension need not continue. 5. Taking such view, I direct the petitioner to send a representation to the second respondent for revoking the order of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 suspension, enlisting the grounds why the order of suspension shall be revoked. The said representation has to be sent to the second respondent, within a period of two weeks from this date and on receipt of the same, the second respondent is directed to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks thereafter. 6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs. SD ASST REGISTRAR ( CO ) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR SML To 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Collectorate, Tirunelveli. 2.The Personal Assistant (General), To Collector, Collectorate, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Tahsildar, Ambasamudram Taluk, Taluk Office, Tirunelveli District. 1CC TO MR. T. LAJAPATHI ROY, ADVOCATE, SR: 6825: 1CC TO THE SPL. GOVT PLEADER SR: 6966: DM:2011::MARCH:22::: Order made in W.P.(MD).No.3033 of 2011 2P:6C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/