1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Civil Revision Application St. No. 1484 of 2008 [Mahesh N. Patil & ors. Vs. Arjun P. Narkhede & ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.A. Mohta, Advocate for the applicants. ----- CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J. DATE : 22nd February,2008. 1. Heard. 2. The applicants are the defendant nos. 2,4 and 5. 3. In the suit filed by the plaintiffs, they have claimed the relief of partition and possession. In Prayer Clause [b] of the plaint, they have alleged that the transactions of sale done by the defendant nos. 1 to 3 and father of defendant no.4 do not bind their shares. 4. Defendants have raised an objection as to pecuniary jurisdiction, urging that the aggregate of the sale considerations disclosed in the sale transactions, in relation to which a declaration that those do not bind plaintiffs' shares is sought, totals to a sum of Rs. 1,06,600-00 and hence the suit is beyond the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Civil Judge 2 [Junior Division], Malkapur. 5. On what is shown by the applicants, the entirety of sale is not under challenge, and what is challenged is that the sale-deed does not bind the plaintiffs' share. On this ground alone, impugned order is seen to have been legally passed. 6. Therefore, no interference is called for. Civil Revision Application is dismissed. Judge |Hedau|