THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1368 of 2004 JUDGMENT: The petitioner-complainant herein filed a private complaint against the respondents inter alia alleging offences punishable under Sections 381, 406, 420, and 482 read with Section 34 and 120-A IPC and the same was numbered as C.C.No.168 of 1993 before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District. As the case being a private warrant procedure, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents-accused pleaded discharge. However, the learned Magistrate refused to discharge them and accordingly, passed order on 24-2-1996. The same was questioned by filing Crl.R.P.No.25 of 1996 before the Principal Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Saroornagar, Hyderabad. The learned Sessions Judge, vide his order dated 24-2- 1997 partly allowed the said revision, while discharging respondents-A1 to A5, refused to discharge A6. Questioning the said order, the complainant filed this revision stating that the order of discharge is illegal. Heard the learned counsel on either side. Having considered the submissions and also perusing the impugned order, this Court is of the view that A6 alone is having relationship with the complainant company as an employee. Nowhere in the counter it is mentioned with regard to nexus between A6 and respondents-A1 to A5. In fact, this ground alone prompted the Sessions Court to come to the conclusion that the respondents-A1 to A5 are entitled to discharge under Section 245 Cr.P.C. There is no infirmity in the order passed by the lower appellate Court and it needs no interference by this Court. Accordingly, the criminal revision case is dismissed. ________________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J rkk Dated: 10-3-2011