IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18334 of 2009 FULAN CHAUDHARY Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 05/ 10.09.2009 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Section 302/34 of the Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Submission is that the first firing is attributed to named accused Banti Chaudhary. The firing thereafter is not attributed specifically to any of the three named accompanied by two unknown accused and there are only three fire arm injuries on the person of the deceased. The petitioner is one of the three named accused accompanied by two unknown. The allegations are that named accused Banti Chaudhary fired hitting the victim who ran for his life. The informant, who is an eye witness, also ran, when then the three persons surrounded the deceased and fired upon him. The reference to these three persons obviously is to the three named accused including the petitioner. Three fire arm injuries have been found on the person of the deceased. The prayer for bail is rejected. It is made clear that the discussion in the present order shall be confined exclusively to the consideration of the bail only. DKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)