IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2890 of 2010 Singeshwar Das ---Petitioner Versus State of Bihar & Ors. ---Opp. Parties ---------------------------------- 4. 15.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the University as also the State. A show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party-State as also the University. Learned counsel appearing for the University submits that the claims of the petitioner have been settled as indicated in paragraph 3 of the show cause filed on behalf of the University. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the calculation indicated in paragraph 3 of the show cause is not intelligible as to under what circumstances excess payments have been indicated against the head “Pension” as also “arrears of salary”. It is further submitted that it is not appearing as to whether statutory interest, as directed by this Court, has been included in the aforesaid payments. Considering the submissions of the parties and the show cause, I am not inclined to proceed further in the matter. The M.J.C. application stands disposed of. However, as submitted by the petitioner that the discrepancy indicated in paragraph 3 of the - 2 - show cause would be brought to the notice of the concerned authority of the University as also with regard to the grievance relating to the payment of statutory interest. In case the petitioner brings it to the notice of the authority concerned, the same may be considered and verified from the records and upon verification, if any further amount is found admissible, the same may be paid expeditiously. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)