1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4245 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1800 OF 2009 Venkat S/o.Pandurang Suryawanshi APPLICANT VERSUS Shri.Sant Tukaram Bahuudeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Sarola and others RESPONDENTS Mr.Vivek Dhage, learned counsel for applicant Mr.V.B.Ghatge, learned AGP for respondent no.3,4 and 5 Mr.P.M.Shah with Mr.S.P.Shah, learned counsel for res.no.1 and 2 (CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, AND A.V.POTDAR, J.J.) DATE : 04/09/2009 PER COURT : 1. This is an application by which the applicants seek to intervene. The request of the applicants for intervention on the ground that they are both necessary and proper parties is opposed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. We need not dilate in respect of the challenges made to the intervention of the applicants on behalf of the petitioner as we have allowed the petition and have remitted the matter back to the Education Officer i.e. respondent no. 3 for a decision afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to the 2 petitioner and to those whom the Education Officer considers it necessary. In the light of that therefore, this application seeking to intervene is dismissed with liberty to the applicants to apply to the Education Officer for grant of hearing. In the event such an application is made, the Education Officer would decide if the applicants are in any manner concerned with the Institution and accordingly pass orders in accordance with Law. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.) khs/SEP 2009/ca4245-09