IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATnSGH AT BILASPUR Civil Revision No. ^^11 /2003 Civil Revision u/s 115 of the C.P.C. APPLICANT PLAINTIFF RESPONDENT &EFENDANT ^flakesh Kumar aged 38 years son of B.P.Pandey resident of Sarkanda Tahsil anct District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh VERSUS 1./ State of Chhattisgarh through Collector, Bilaspur (CG) CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OFTHE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDUflE. ARISING OUT OF ORDER! PASSED BY hyfH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUE^E ANNEXURE A-1. BILASPUR IN MISCEtl-ANEOUS CIVIL APPEAL N6®^ 2001 DATED 13^.2003. IN ORIGINALCIVIt. Sltffflto. 80A^001 PENDING IN THE COURT OF ''DCTH GIVILi JUDGE CLASS IIBILASPUR ORDER RASSED QN| 16.10^001 BETWEEN RAKESH KUMAR V/S STOTE OFi CHHATTISGARH VIDE ANNEXURE A-1. K XI-HC-22 ^ 3s? '^\w<-\^, w^ww, Ri<-)itfy 3TR[?T Ma^> *11*<CTI BiHlch fo^ g^ Afl^ R|<>«A sii^rw ^RiSII^T sfiiwBfer sii^i gwiigrflf?(T . *l'i(Fd'ifl'f ^IKfTl'ffFs^ <KI<^H ^isrf^iTsn^T ^ .<^ ] ,-9 UAlLnCt/' 04m3/200S Shri Narendra Goswamil counsel for the applicant. Shri Akhil Agrawal, P.L. fot the State. Heard. Leamed counsel for thd applicant submits that the instari| revision has been preferred agains( the order passed In Civil Suit NoJ 07/2001 by the flret Appellate Courl and by which the appeal of the| applicant was dismissed and thej application under Order 39 rule 1 of] CPC for temporary injunction was| rejected by the trial Court. Howwer,[ learned counsel for the applicant| submits that during the paidency of this revision petition the suit has| been flnally decided by the trial Court and as such the present| revision has become inftuctuous. In view ofthe submissionsl made by the applicant, the revision| is dlsmissed as having become| infructuous. Sd/- DHCRENDRA MBHRA ('ft^sloi)