IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23919 of 2008 MUKTI SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 1.7.2008 Heard. The petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name appears quite late in the case diary in paragraph 18. The contention is that if at all the witness Sahabuddin had seen and identified the petitioner as one of the members who committed the murder it was expected that the petitioner’s name could have appeared in the FIR. Considering the above of the name of the petitioner and the contention as indicated above, let the above named petitioner be released from custody on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M.Motihari in Turkaulia P.S.Case no.318 of 2005. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )