IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID THURSDAY, THE 6TH MARCH 2008 / 16TH PHALGUNA 1929 CRP.No. 412 of 2004 --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31/03/2004 IN IA 560/2004 IN OS.8/2004 of I ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, TRIVANDRUM .................... REVN. PETITIONER: ------------------ 1. K. MADHU, PROPRIETOR, KRISHNA KRIPA, T.C.5/1883 (2), PEROORKADA, TRIVANDRUM. 2. S. NARAYANA SWAMI, MANIKATH CROSS ROAD, VALANJAMBALAM, KOCHI-18. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAVIKUMAR RESPONDENTS: ------------- M. MANI, S/O. MADHAVAN PILLAI, MEENA BHAVAN, KUNNUKUZHI, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/03/2008, ALONG WITH CRP NO. 445 OF 2004, & CRP NO. 1030 OF 2004 AND WPC NO. 14961 OF 2005 & WPC NO. 27715 OF 2005, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: HARUN-UL-RASHID, J. ===================== C.R.P. NOS. 412 of 2004, 445 of 2004 & 1030 of 2004 & W.P.(C)Nos.14961 of 2005 & 27715 of 2005 ======================== DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2008 ORDER The suit is for a declaration of the Copy Right or a film, for injunction and also for damages. The above revision petitions are filed against interlocutory orders passed at the trial stage. 2. When the matters came up for final hearing today, counsel for the revision petitioners, who is the counsel appearing for the respondents in the above writ petitions, submitted that by order dated 11-2-2008 the plaint was rejected since the plaintiff has not paid the balance court fee. Therefore, the civil revision petitions and the writ petitions have become infructuous and hence the same are dismissed. Sd/- HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE ks. TRUE COPY P.S.TO JUDGE K.R.UDAYABHANU,J. =================== CRL.A.NO. OF 200 JUDGMENT DATE: ......2006 ===