IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Appeal No. 203 of 2009 Uttarakhand Laboratory Technician Association Through Members and President J.P. Chahar . .……… Appellant Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ……… Respondents Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, A.C.J. Hon’ble B.S. Verma, J. Heard Shri S.S. Yadav, the learned counsel for the appellant, Shri H.M. Raturi, the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3, Shri Manoj Tiwari, the learned senior counsel assisted by Shri Alok Mehra, the learned counsel for the caveator, Shri Arvind Vashist, the learned counsel for respondent No.4 and Shri M.S. Chauhan, the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 6, 7 and 8. The present special appeal has been filed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 23rd October, 2009. It transpires that the writ petitioner, which is an association of the Laboratory Technicians, filed the writ petition for the quashing of the advertisement by which applications were invited for the appointment on the post of Lab Technician. The writ petitioner seems to be a busy body poking its nose in someone else’s affairs. The association is neither an aggrieved person nor is an applicant in that advertisement. The learned Single Judge had rightly dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the writ petitioner is not an aggrieved person. We are entirely in agreement with the decision of the learned Single Judge. The special appeal fails and is dismissed summarily. (B.S. Verma, J.) (Tarun Agarwala, A.C.J.) 06.11.2009 LSR/Shiv