C^a-r. (o ;s@^! 'SSS ?.!,; INLTHE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION(C) N0.^\°)<h /2011. PETITIONER: / ^ r ^iji!l^;~ii* ^sy .^ <t'^y ^ versus RespQndent: Rakesh Chaturvedi, son of Late Bhusan Lal Chaturvedi, aged about 49 years, working as I.F.S. Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Raipur, residence of H-18, Anupam Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. K lattisgarh Lok Ayog, Through Secretaiy, Chhattisgarh Lok Ayog, Gandhi Chowk, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. B WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Inns^^a ^^•'^-^ ^^tSghff:.;. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONER RESPONDENT WRIT PETITION (C) No. 2798 of 2011 Rakesh Chaturvedi VERSUS Chhattisgarh Lok Ayog WRIT PETITION UNDER ART|CLE22e OP THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Manjndra Mphan Shrivastava, <!. Present: Shri C.J.K. Rao and Shri Jitendra Gupta, Advocates for the petitioner. ORDER(ORAL1 (Passed on 18s" day of May, 2011) 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel appeanng for the petittoner submitthat the matter in respect of which the enqulry is being made by the Lok Ayog, has alteady been enquired into, report has been submitted and the order h»been passed on 16-7-2008 (Annexure P/3). Learned counsel furttier submit that the mandatory provisioii with regard to submission of compteint as required under Section 8 (1) of ChhatKsgarh Lok Ayog Adhiniyam, has not been complied with in its letter and spirit. 3. This petition has been filed by the petitioner against the noUce dated 2-5-2011 (Annexure P/1) issued by the Secretary, Chhattisgarh Lok Ayog, Raipur. The notkse contains various alle^tions against the petitioner. The petitioner has been asked to submlt his reply and defence. The petitioner is also being afforded opportuntty of personal hearing. The pet'rtion, therefore, appears to be pre-mature. However, it would be open for the petitioner to file appropriate reply to the notice dated 2-5-2011 (Annexure P/1) before the Lok Ayog. 4. Needless to emphasize, if the grievance of tbe petitioner is npt redressed, the petitioner is at llberty to avait the remedy, whlch may be available to him under the law, if so advtsed. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. 6. Accordingly, I.A. Nos. 1,2 & 3 stand disposed of. Manin'^^^'^" \/ Judge ^ Gowri