IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22114 of 2011 Rajeev Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 03/ 22.12.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 26.10.2008 in a case registered under sections 394, 411of the IPC and 25(I-B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was caught at the spot but nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner and co-accused Dipak Mahto from whose possession fire arms has been recovered has already been granted privilege of bail. It is further contended by him that there is no likelihood of the conclusion of the trial of the petitioner in near future which is evident from the report of the learned trial court. Although, trial of the petitioner has been delayed by the conduct of the accused who is on bail but considering the detention of the petitioner in jail custody as well as this aspect of the matter that having more or less similar allegation co-accused Dipak Mahto has already been granted privilege of bail, let the petitioner, Rajeev Kumar, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Ranjeet Prasad, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Khagaria in Alauli P.S. Case no. 161/2008 subject to the conditions that petitioner shall attend the learned trial court in person on each and every date for the period - 2 - of nine months and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)