IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.7419 of 2005 ==================================== Amit Kumar .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondents. ============================== For the Petitioner : Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Advocate. Mr. Kiran Sinha, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, A.C. To G.A. 1 ============================== 2 10.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. This writ application has been filed by the petitioner for direction to the respondent to pay the compensation/ damages amounting to Rs.3,60,080/-(Three lack sixty thousand eighty) only to the petitioner as he had been allotted the work of scheme no.23 vide Kusmaul Ringh Banch from K.M. 380 to 2.380 K.M. under Executive Engineer, West Canal Division, Nirmali, which was subsequently allotted to another contractor without giving information to the petitioner. Neither the other contractor has been impleaded nor the allotment of work in his favour has been challenged by the writ petitioner and this writ petition has been filed for the payment of due. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to raise his claim before an appropriate forum. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. PN (S.N. Hussain, J.)