CWP No. 16022 of 2008 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CWP No.16022 of 2008 Date of Decision: 09.09.2008 M/s R. B. Woolen Mills(P) Ltd., Amritsar. ...... Petitioner Versus Central Bank of India and another ...... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr.Saurav Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner. **** Ajay Tewari, J. The petitioner has challenged the notice issued under Section 13 (4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interests Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') mainly on the ground that the objections filed by the petitioner to the notice under Section 13(2) of the Act were not decided by a speaking order and that the respondent-bank should be held bound to some settlement arrived at before the Debt Recovery Tribunal on 28.9.2002. In our opinion this petition must fail. By the petitioners own showing the dispute between the parties is pending before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. Further Section 17 of the Act provides for an appeal against the order passed under Section 13 (4) of the Act. Moreover in reply CWP No. 16022 of 2008 2 to the petitioner's objections all the contentions have been dealt with and a speaking order has been passed. Consequently this petition is dismissed with, however, no order as to costs. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE September 09, 2008 sunita