IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5689 of 2010 ANIRUDH YADAV, son of Dulo Yadav @ Gulo Yadav, resident of village Mahauli, P.S. Rosera, District – Samastipur. ------------- Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ------------ Opp. Party. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. S.N. P. Sinha, Sr. Adv. Ms. Mira Kumari, Adv. For the State : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP. ******** 03. 19.05.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. The petitioner who apprehends his arrest in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 40 of 2009 for offences under Section 364/376/302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, instituted five F.I.R. named accused persons. Petitioner’s name emerged during the course of investigation on some confidential information and as referred in para 25 and 26 of the case diary, on some whispering about the marriage of daughter of the informant with this petitioner, but, there is nothing more against the petitioner in the investigation, the victim a young daughter of the informant was reportedly missing since 23.02.2009, but, police was informed only on 28.02.2009. After recovery of almost decomposed dead body which could be identified only by certain cloths. On post mortem examination, the doctor was unable to say anything about the cause of death though it reveals that the death caused 5 to 10 days before examination. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and finding nothing specific against the petitioner, in the event 2 of his arrest/surrender within four weeks from receipt of the copy of this order, petitioner, namely, Anirudh Yadav, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, District – Samastipur, in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 40 of 2009. Subject to condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to attend to court at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier, on failure on two consecutive dates, privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/ (Akhilesh Chandra, J.)