IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10063 of 2008 ====================================================== 1. Raju Soren , son of Kishun Soren, resident of village - Terasi, Tola - Raniganj, Police Station - Raniganj, District – Araria 2. Chhote Lal Murmu, son of Bikram Murmu, resident of village - Terasi, Tola , Raniganj, Police Station - Raniganj, District - Araria .... .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Additional Collector, Araria 3. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Araria 4. Hargobind Rakshit, son of Late Bijay Rakshit, resident of village – Barhana, Police Station – Raniganj, District - Araria 5. Madan Rakshit, son of Late Bijay Rakshit, resident of village - Barbawa, Police Station – Raniganj, District - Araria .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Sc18) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 05-04-2013 Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.C. to Additional Advocate General No. 7. The present writ petition is in relation to a dispute under Section 48E of the B.T. Act, 1885. In this case, till date, no order has been passed for issuance of notice to private respondents. However, during the pendency of the present writ petition for adjudicating such dispute an appropriate forum as “Land Tribunal” has been constituted and functioning under the provision of Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009. Accordingly, the court is of the opinion that this matter Patna High Court CWJC No.10063 of 2008 (3) dt.05-04-2013 2/2 can well be adjudicated by the Tribunal. Accordingly, in view of provision contained in Section 15 of the Act, the Registry is directed to transmit the record of the case to the Tribunal forthwith. Praful/- (Rakesh Kumar, J)