CRM No. M 32242 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- CRM No. M 32242 of 2009 Date of decision: 07, 2009 Manish Kumar ........ petitioner Versus State of Haryana .......Respondent(s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Surinder Dagar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Pradeep Virk, DAG, Haryana for respondent-State Mr. Robin Dutt, Advocate for the complainant -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that legal notice was issued on 18.08.2009. In the aforesaid legal notice, there was no mention about the amount over and above Rs.1,00,000/-. Whereas, in the FIR which was lodged on 24.10.2009, an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- has been shown. It is further stated that in case this amount had been paid to the petitioner, the same would have been mentioned in the legal notice. CRM No. M 32242 of 2009 2 It is brought to the notice of the Court by the learned counsel for the complainant that the legal notice was issued only qua the bounced cheques and not with respect to the remaining amount for which no cheque was issued. The matter is still at the investigating stage. The said money was paid to the petitioner by misleading the complainant with a promise that he shall be sent abroad. However, the petitioner embezzled the aforesaid amount and nor sent the complainant abroad. No ground for bail is made out. Dismissed. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge December 07, 2009 mohan