SS'..!1 % ' 1 - ^"i^l^ ,0' N'*,^c z\ HIGH COURT OF CKHATTiSGARH AT Bji-AaPuR &^ja<'imr%^r :UliwEi^5 rSAffflrif-lss"1' ~^tSSj!.S9s&Iii-. .. ifi&rt '^y7\fQ^\ S^n &^^7 nr p.etitjon (Art.2_27XORl.No.551Z f 201 Raju Kashyap S/o Shivdeo Kashyap aged about 38 vears R/o Devman Chaai Chhatideeha (Chsngrajpara Road Bllaspur), P.S. Sarkanda r^<)aiS'riin'T E<Ui"s^'ntt sr fcSiiapsur, iansii & usstnoi tsuaspur (C.G.) srt^rs^si^y -v^S^l^wtf^SiJi. PIaintiff versus Kunesar S/o lats Kunj Sinsh Thakur aged about 63 years R/o Katiyapara Udai-Chowk Siiaspur, P.S. City Kotwaii BISaspur, Tahsl! & Disirict siiasD'ur CC.G.) iVVrli Peiition under Articie 227 of the Constitutlon of iRdia) Mr.RajeRdra Kumar Sury'a>A'ansh!,.counssi forthe petltionsr. (SB: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, u'.) 'tW ^B» S^rfB Fvi fc—tV (26-9-2011) 1. By thls 'A'rit peiition under Articse 227 of the Constitution of india ths petitionsr has chalisnged ths iegaiit, & propriety of the orasr dated 2.8.2011 passed by the 7tn Civl! Judge Ciass-il, Biiaspur, in Civil Suit No.17Ai- 2. Rsgistry has pointed oui the defauit ihat ihe petitioner has marked and underiined in documents. 3. i havs perused the petltion and the order impugned. 4. On perusai of the pefstion ar.d ths order impugned, i do rsot find any ' iliegality jn ihs'order Impugned at this stage because no puniiive order sen passed against the p^tffioner. las bee; Cdnssquentiy, the wrlt petiiioR is iiabie to be dismissed and it is hsrsby riismissed. No ordsr as io costs. Sd/- T.P.Sharma Judge