GAN ^^( IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH M.A.(C) No. \\-^\ / 2009 Sinsle BgocB APPELLANT ^ ^ v •< 'NON-APPLICANT N0. 3 R.R. N0.....—..^?^^^. p^^^^^y^"^ Bated..:...........S^'s<a R&SPONDENT/ XPPLICANT : ^The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Through : Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Malviya V1 Nagar, Durg (C.G.) VERSUS 5^' RESPONDENT/ /ISION-APPLICANT N0.1 RESPONDENT/ N6N-APPLICANT N0. 2 N^ l1. Himan Joshi S/o Late Shri Ram Vilas Joshi aged about 35 years R/o Banbarad Ward no. 15 Nagar Panchayat Ahiwara Distt. Durg (CG). 2. Manjeet Singh S/o Shri Veer «" Singh, aged about 25 years, R/o Bhagwanpur P.S. Korali Distt. Gurdaspur (Panjab) 3. Lakhavindar Singh S/o Shri Amar Singh Sandhu, permanent address : CW-191, SGT Nagar Delhi. current address : 16/7 Mathura Road Faridabad (Hariyana). MISC APPEAL (CLAIM) UNDER SECTION 173 OF MOTOR VEHICLEACT,1988 —78 sn^T^Fi'f^N? TT8TT ^TT^T^RW l^- ^\ 'i-^^^; -^> ^sr r<)i<4i<n'4, ^Tii<-i<i<o, fc«ni^*4,< ^......h&£....M.'.-.:..11.2-.l./.£i TTTO^TT^W^ ' "Aw "^ / =^ TT^ 200 3H^T'IT5R7 ( y<f^<^;T) ^?TTW^rft^3H^[ S.B: HON'BLE MRJUSTIC^ 13.12.2011: None for the appellant Mr. Goutam Khetrapal,) Even after the matterl appeared for the appellant, Court has no other option bu|t prosecutjon. Accordingly, the mis^: prosecution. q>»l^?<rt4iTTTR^ff "^ 'fe^t' ^^K ^3tRR3rT1^T N.K. AGARWAL counsel for respondent No. 1 . was called in the second round; none therefore, in these circumstances. this t to dismissthe misc. appeal for want of appeal is< dismlssed for want of Sd/- N.K.Agrawal Judge