1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. MISC. CIVIL APPLN. NO.482 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.93 OF 2008. ( RAMESH FAKIRA INGOLE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTH.) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's orders ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Shri R.J.Shinde h/f. Shri S.U.Nemade, Advocate for Applicant. CORAM : A.P.BHANGALE, J. DATED : JUNE 16, 2008. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. For non-compliance of default order dated 27th February, 2008 for removal of office objections within three weeks the appeal stood dismissed earlier. Now, the learned Advocate for the applicant prayed for restoration of the appeal which was dismissed. While drafting present application the learned Advocate has mentioned below his signature “Counsel for Respondent” and below the Solemn Affirmation signature is of Shri Subhash Uttamrao Nemade, as counsel for the appellant/ applicant. 2 3. Considering that after the first appeal was listed on 27.02.2008 for removal of office objections and the conditional order by which three weeks time was granted for removal of the office objections. The appellant was already informed that the appeal shall be dismissed in default if steps were taken within stipulated time which expired on 19.03.2008. The reasons stated as paucity of funds and sickness of the applicant is not supported by any acceptable documentary evidence. Therefore, there is no reasonable ground for setting aside the earlier order dated 19.03.2008 for dismissal of appeal in default. The application, therefore, stands dismissed. JUDGE RR.