IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2721 of 2010 Date of Decision : February 17, 2010. Santokh Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Jasmeet Singh Bedi, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner wants his employment as a Lab Attendant on daily wages out of the PTA funds, in respondent No.3-College. His case is that the persons junior to him, namely, respondent Nos.4 & 5, have been retained but he was over-looked during the last academic session. The petitioner accordingly stakes his claim for employment in the next academic session starting from August, 2010. The petitioner is said to have served the respondents through a legal notice dated 7.1.2010 (Annexure P-2) but without any response. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of the above-mentioned claim of the petitioner C.W.P.No .2721 of 2010 2 which needs to be factually verified by the authorities, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to take cognizance of the legal notice dated 7.1.2010 (Annexure P-2) served on behalf of the petitioner and dispose of the same by passing a speaking order as early as possible, preferably before 31.5.2010. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. 17-02-2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE