IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 947 OF 2009 (M/S) Ms. Monika Kandari (minor), (Through Guardian) D/o Sri Narayan Singh. ………….Petitioner. Versus Secretary, Vidyalayi Shiksha Evam Pariksha Parishad, Ramnagar, Nainital. ………..Respondent. Mr. Virendra Kaparwan, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Aniruddh Bhatt, Advocate for respondent. 29th June, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhansu Dhulia, J. The petitioner has filed this writ petition praying for scrutiny of certain papers of Intermediate Examination, 2009. Such petitions (Writ Petition No. 844 of 2009 (MS) & Writ Petition No. 845 of 2009 (MS) have been dismissed in limine by this Court vide order dated 12.6.2009. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that his case is different as in those petitions, the petitioners had approached this Court without filing any application for scrutiny, whereas in this case, an application for scrutiny has already been moved by the petitioner (contained as Annexure No. 3 to the writ petition). The apprehension of the petitioner is that the process of scrutiny may be delayed. No presumption can be drawn by this Court regarding the delay in process, it is expected that the respondent Board will proceed expeditiously regarding scrutiny of the papers. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 29.6.2009 Rathour