IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15738 of 2010 SUSHMA DEVI, WIFE OF RAJU MUMAR @ RAJEEV RANJAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LOKIYA, P.S. LAKHISARAI, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. RAJU KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR, SON OF SRI KRISHNANDAN SINGH 3. KRISHNANDAN SINGH, SON OF LATE JAGDISH PD. SINGH, BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LODIYA P.S. LAKHISARAI, DISTRICT LAKHISARAI. ----------- 03. 25.06.2010. Prayer to cancel the bail allowed to opposite party nos.2 and 3 under orders dated 14.7.2008 does not appear to be justified as from perusal of the said order it is evident that petitioner herself has violated the terms of compromise as she is insisting that the sale deed be executed in her favour and not in favour of her child. In the circumstances, I am no inclined to interfere with the order granting bail to opposite party nos.2 and 3. Application is dismissed. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha,J.)