[-1-] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION W.P.NO.7666 OF 2008 Vijaya Dhananjay Palnitkar ..Petitioner Vs. The Addl. Collector and Competent Authority, Ulhasnagar Urban Agglomeration Thane & Ors. ..Respondents ... Mr.S.G.Karandikar advocate for Petitioner Smt.V.S.Gokhale AGP for Respondents ... CORAM: BILAL NAZKI AND CORAM: BILAL NAZKI AND CORAM: BILAL NAZKI AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : APRIL 20, 2009 DATE : APRIL 20, 2009 DATE : APRIL 20, 2009 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and at this stage, petition itself being disposed of with their consent. 2. The Petitioner seeks declaration that the Notification under Section 10(3) of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act has become inoperative in view of the Repeal of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act. This question has already been considered by this Court in Voltas Ltd. & Voltas Ltd. & Voltas Ltd. & [-2-] Anr. Vs. Additional Collector and Competent Anr. Vs. Additional Collector and Competent Anr. Vs. Additional Collector and Competent Authority, Thane urban Agglomeration & Ors. (Writ Authority, Thane urban Agglomeration & Ors. (Writ Authority, Thane urban Agglomeration & Ors. (Writ Petition No.8358 of 2006 Petition No.8358 of 2006 Petition No.8358 of 2006 decided on 25th July, 2008). Respondents in their counter-affidavit have emphatically stated that possession has not been taken by the State and possession continues and remains with the Petitioner. Therefore, we allow this writ petition on the strength of the judgment in Voltas Ltd. (supra) Voltas Ltd. (supra) Voltas Ltd. (supra). [BILAL NAZKI, J.] [BILAL NAZKI, J.] [BILAL NAZKI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]