IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWETIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NOs : 1227, 1229 and 1231 of of 2002 WRIT PETITION NOs.5617 of 2006, 1634, 1647, 1677, 4887 & 23088 of 2007, 22774, 28160 of 2008, 132 and 136 of 2009 WRIT APPEAL NO : 1227 of 2002 Between: K.Govindappa ..... APPELLANT(S) AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others. ………..Respondents WRIT APPEAL NO : 1229 of 2002 Between: The Yemmiganur Agros (P) Ltd., Yemmiganur, Kurnool District ..... APPELLANT(S) AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others. ………..Respondents WRIT APPEAL NO : 1231 of 2002 Between: U.K.Narasimhulu and another ..... APPELLANT(S) AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others. ………..Respondents WRIT PETITION NO : 5617 of 2006 Between: The Yemmiganur Agros (P) Ltd., Yemmiganur, Kurnool District ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others. ………..Respondents WRIT PETITION NO : 1634 of 2007 Between: Y.Neelakanta Goud ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others. ………..Respondents WRIT PETITION NO : 1647 of 2007 Between: Y.Thippanna Goud ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others. ………..Respondents WRIT PETITION NO : 1677 of 2007 Between: Y. Parameswara Goud ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others. ………..Respondents WRIT PETITION NO : 4887 of 2007 Between: Y.C.Ballgotti Goud ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others. ………..Respondents WRIT PETITION NO : 23088 of 2007 Between: P.Eranna ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others. ………..Respondents WRIT PETITION NO : 22774 of 2008 Between: G.Md. Iqbal ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others. ………..Respondents WRIT PETITION NO : 28160 of 2007 Between: K.Mabasha ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others. ………..Respondents WRIT PETITION NO : 132 of 2009 Between: D.Khayum ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others. ………..Respondents WRIT PETITION NO : 136 of 2009 Between: Bariki Babu ..... PETITIONER(S) AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Cooperation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others. ………..Respondents THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NOs : 1227, 1229 and 1231 of of 2002 WRIT PETITION Nos : 5617 of 2006, 1634, 1647, 1677, 4887 & 23088 of 2007, 22774, 28160 of 2008, 132 and 136 of 2009 COMMON JUDGMENT (Per BPR,J): Heard the learned counsel appearing for both the parties. The learned counsel, appearing on either side, submit that having regard to the orders already passed by this Court in W.P.No.7121 of 2007, dated 31-03-2008 and in all the connected matters, for enabling the petitioners to file appropriate application and the same has to be considered by the respondent-Bank, all these matters are also disposed of in the same terms. In view of the same, all the writ appeals and writ petitions are accordingly disposed of with liberty to the appellants and the petitioners to submit the appropriate applications to the respondent- bank for extension of benefit under one time settlement scheme and on receipt thereof, the respondent-bank shall consider the same in accordance with law, guidelines and pass orders. No costs. It is made clear that till the said applications are considered and orders are passed, no coercive steps shall be taken against the appellants and the petitioners. _______________________ JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO Date: 20th August 2009 _______________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR KVR