IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3765 of 2008 Between: Vangala Chinna Pakki Reddy (died) by his LR., V.Venkata Rami Reddy, S/o.Vangala Chinna Pakki Reddy, aged 53 years, R/o.Regadagudu Village, Velugodu Mandal, Kurnool Dist., ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Govt., of A.P., rep by its Secretary, Irrigation and Command Area Development, Project Wing (SRBC), HYDERABAD. 2 The Commissioner Land Revenue, govt., of A.P., Nampaly Station Road, Hyderabad. 3 The Engineer-in-Chief, Irrigation Wing, Erramanzil, Hyderabad. 4 The Special Collector, Land Acquisition Unit, Srisailam Right Branch Canal, Collector Complex, Kurnool Dist., 5 The Specila Deputy Collector-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Srisailam Right Branch Canal, Nandyal, Kurnool Dist., .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SANGAM SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for Respondent Nos.2, 4 & 5: AGP FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 3: None appeared The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.1 to 5 herein in not depositing the compensation amount to the credit of E.P.No.54/2006 in O.P.No.163 of 1990 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Atmakur, Kurnool District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos.1 to 5 herein to deposit the compensation amount to the credit of E.P.No.54/2006 in O.P.No.163 of 1990 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Atmakur, Kurnool District.” After arguing the case for some time, Sri S.Srinivas Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, WPMP.No.4905 of 2008 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 22nd FEBRUARY, 2008 kvni