IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO : 4837 of 2007 Petition under Section ____ of CPC., to revise/against the order dated ______ in NO : of 0 on the file of the court of the Between: Pillutla srinivasa Rao, S/o. Late Venkatappaiah, R/o. 2-1-188, Rajaka Veedhi, Khammam. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Pillutla Siva Shankar, S/o. Late Venkatappaiah, R/o. 2-1-180, Rajakaveedhi, Khammam 2 Pillutla Venkateswarlu, ( died ) per LRs S/o. Late Venkatappaiah, R/9o. 2-1-1888 Rajakaveedhi, Khammam 3 Pillutla Chandrasekhar, S/o. Late VEnkatappaiah, R/o. 2-1-205, Rajaka Veedhi, Khammam 4 P. Mangamma C/o P. Venkateswarlu H.No. 2-1-1888 Rajakaveedhi, Khammam 5 Mamidalla Uma D/o P. Venkateswarlu H.No. 2-1-393 Rajakaveedhi, Khammam 6 P. Sandhya D/o P. Venkateswarlu H.No. 2-1-1888 Rajakaveedhi, Khammam ( RR 4 to 6 brought on record as LRs of deceased R2 Vide Court Order dt. 25-08-08 in CMP NO. 3668/08 ) .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.RAVI SHANKER Counsel for the Respondent No.: . The Court made the following : PSR, J. C.R.P.No. 4837 of 2007 O r d e r: In spite of service of notices, none appeared for the respondents. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In the circumstances explained, the revision petition is allowed. The order passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Khammam, dismissing I.A.No. 686 of 2005 is set aside and the delay of (75) days, in filing the petition to restore the suit which was dismissed for default, is condoned. The trial court is directed to dispose of I.A.No.241 of 2004 expeditiously. No costs. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. Dated:09—03—2010. *BVS