1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7422 OF 2010 Nirmala Surendra Shirsath ..PETITIONER -VERSUS- The State of Maharashtra and others ..RESPONDENTS ......... Mr. K.F. Shingare, advocate for petitioner. Mr.S.V. Kurundkar, Addl. G.P. for respondent no.1 and 3. Mr.S.T. Shelke, advocate for respondent no.2 and 4. Mr.M.G. Mustafa, advocate for respondent no.6. ........ (CORAM : V.R.KINGAONKAR,J.) DATE : 18 th August, 2010. PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved due to acceptance of the nomination form of the respondent no.5 from the ward no.2 of village panchayat for ensuing village panchayat election. 3. Considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and on going through the record, it appears that the main objection raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that her name is improperly and incorrectly shown as Asha Laxman Rupekar notwithstanding the fact that the voters list 2 shows her name as Rupekar Asarabai Laxman. It appears, however, she has filed affidavit whereby the fact situation is duly clarified and the Returning Officer relied upon the statement made on affidavit along with the relevant documents viz; school leaving certificate, caste certificate etc. In any case, the petitioner has raised disputed questions of facts, which can not be determined in the writ jurisdiction and at the fag end of the election process, it is difficult to intervene and stall the process. The Petition is disposed of accordingly. (V.R.KINGAONKAR) JUDGE gas/wp7422.10