IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10912 of 2010 LALLAN PASWAN son of late Maryad Paswan, resident of village Lohara, Police Station Chainpur, District Kaimur at Bhabua … … Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar… …Opposite Party For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajni Kant Pandey, Advocate For the State: Mr. B.B. Prasant, APP ….. 3 15.04.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is in custody and seeks bail in a case registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 427, 341, 435, 436, 504, 379 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, section 27 of the Arms Act section 17 of the C.L.A. Act and sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substance Act. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations are against 18 named accused persons and 25 other unknown persons and the same are general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that co-accused Sheo Murat ram, Sri Rai, Mameshwar Baitha and Sarju Bind have been granted bail by different Benches of this Court vide different orders. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 07.04.2008. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the - 2 - case, I direct the abovenamed petitioner, LALLAN PASWAN, to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Kaimur at Bhabua in Bhagwanpur Police Station Case No. 42 of 1999 (Sessions Trial No. 122 of 2008/92 of 2008) with further condition that one of the bailors must be close relative or family member of the petitioner, who shall state on affidavit before the court concerned, giving complete genealogy, as to how he is related with the petitioner. Further, after his release, if the petitioner is again found involved in similar kind of offences, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. The petitioner shall also remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial and if the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates in course of trial without any reasonable cause shown by him, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. SC (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)