FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. DISTRICT: Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Court’s or Judge’s order Civil Application No. 10168 Of 2008 IN Second Appeal St.No. 15408 of 2008 ----- Mr. R.v. Naiknaware Advocate for applicant. Mr. S.D. Kaldate, AGP for respondent No. 3 &4. Mr. A.T. Gute Advocate holding for S.T. Gute Advocate for respondent No. 7. ----- 1) Heard counsel. 2) The application is for condonation of delay, the delay is of 38 days. According to the applicant, the delay is caused due to time consumed in obtaining certified copies and also due to the official difficulties in processing proposal for filing of the appeal, no reply affidavit is filed. The appeal is preferred by Municipal Council. -2- 3) Considering the procedural difficulties in the Semi-Governmental organisation, the explanation appears to be proper. Consequently, I accept the explanation given in the application and condone the delay. 4) Civil Application is allowed. (V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.) Dated: 9th NOVEMBER 2009 SDM/ 10168.08