THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 3744 2010 Dated: 27.08.2010 Between: G.Siva Kumar, Ananthapur District. … Petitioner And G.Madavilatha, Ananthapur District. … Respondent THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI Civil Revision Petition No. 3744 2010 O R D E R: The petitioner herein is the respondent in F.C.O.P. No.38 of 2010 on the file of the Family Court, Ananthapur, which was filed by the respondent herein for dissolution of the marriage. The respondent herein got herself examined as P.W.1 and during the cross-examination, the counsel for the petitioner herein put the following question to her: Question: Have you mentioned in such interim maintenance petition that the respondent has got such capacity to earn Rs.30,000/- to Rs.40,000/- per month? The Court below overruled the said question observing that it was not relevant as the O.P. was for divorce. Aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition has been filed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and taken note of the facts of the case, I am unable to hold that the Court below had committed any error in overruling the question put in the cross-examination of P.W.1. Hence, interference by this Court in exercise of the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not warranted. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. ​ ______________ G. ROHINI, J Date: 27.08.2010 KLP