IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.27120 of 2010 1. NAYEEM son of Md. Yunus 2. Harun @ Harun Rashid son of Md. Yunus-------------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 27.8.2010 Heard Learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. There is clear allegation that petitioners stopped the complainant and snatched sale proceeds of rice Rs.900/- from her while she was coming from market after selling rice. Same is doubted on the ground that parties come from same village and Maulabi Taiyab and Abdul Hamid are the real persons for whom this case is lodged by complainant. Originally they did not come in picture rather Taiyab’s son was made witness among three. Two of them except Juber, sons of Taiyab did not appear to make statement on S.A. in enquiry then only Abdul Shahid, brother of Abdul Hamid, appeared to depose. A case under sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code was filed on behalf of petitioner no.2 against Maulabi Taiyab and Abdul Hamid along with others. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Kishanganj, in connection with Complaint Case no.C222 of 2009 ,subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal 2 Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh,J )