IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 98 of 2001 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 29/11/2000 in WP NO : 15647 OF 2000 on the file of the High Court.) Between: 1 Kambham Raja Reddy S/o.Ganga Reddy Tirupathi Chittoor Dist 2 Chittoor Subba Reddy S/o.Venkataswamy Reddy Srikalahasthi Chittoor Dist 3 Thota Venkata Narsaiah S/o.Srinivasulu R/o.Tirupathi Chittoor Dist ... APPELLANTS AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Secretary Revenue Department Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad 2 The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District 3 A.P.Tourism Development Corporation rep.by its Managing Director Tankbund, Hyderabad 4 A.P.Tourism Development Corporation Branch, rep.by its Divisional Manager TTD, III Choultry, Tirupathi Chittoor Dist 5 The Inam Dy.Tahsildar, Chittoor 6 M.Ch.Nageswara Rao Presently working as Superintendent Office of the Mandal Revenue Office Valsarai Mandal Krishna District .RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants: MR.M.RAVINDRANATH REDDY Counsel for Respondent Nos.1, 2, 5 & 6: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent Nos.3 and 4: MR.A.K.NARASIMHA RAO & MR.NANDIGAMA KRISHNA RAO. The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT APPEAL NO : 98 of 2001 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble.Justice T.Meena Kumari) Though the matter is of the year 2001 and listed for final hearing, learned counsel for the appellants is not present when the case is called nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. _____________________ T.MEENA KUMARI,J Date: 30-06-2008 ____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J GS/ASP