IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGASRH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l WRITPETITION(SlNo.tl^£)o 2011 PETITIONER ^ RESPONDENTS \\- ^ ^ ^ /' :^^s/ ' ^y7 ^ ^" / ^y/ ^w : Shiv Raj Singh, aged about 58 years, son of late S. P. Singh, at present working as a "Deputy Ranger", Sub Division Konta, Forest Division Sukama, District Bastar (C.G.) VERSUS : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Forest Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Chief Conservator of Forests, Forest Department of the State of Chhattisgarh, Jail Road, Raipur (C.G.) ^"" 3. The Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Sukama, District Bastar (C.G.) 4. Rama Ram Markam, at present working as forester, Pratapgiri Parisar (Tongepal Range), Forest Division Sukaina, District Bastar (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT OR MANDAMUS/ CERTIORARI. ORDER/ ORDERS, DIRECTION / DIRECTIONS ETC. ^- <0^ XI-HC—78- 3?nit?i ^T f^Tw '<T8H ^TT^T $t)*iicb ll^a&^, *<i*i<y(r «»*<icb "S^ ^WWii, ^tll'f-I^Ko, [®l<yll-(-1^< Ju.t^lM..^../..li^200 3TT^?T T^W ( y<^<^) l^cHW TiftU 31T^?T fSB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra IMohan Shrivastava, J.j 8.8.2011 Shri Vishnu Koshta^ Shri N. Naha Roy, Pane| No. 1 to 3, on advance copy. coi.^iisel for the petitioner^ 'Lawyer for the State/respondents This petition has been order dated 12.7.2011, by wpiich the petitioner from Kistaram duty and in his place, responcj Leamed counsel for petitioner was posted at Ki^ before and in a very quick submits fhat respondent Noj Forester. Leamed counsel f^ that there is no complaint ag£(inst As far as shifting of petij: is concerned, impugned orde^ shit'ted on some stated exigenjc ^i^F<li<i1Ti tTPTOf ^ 'feTst ~<pi1^j< ^^tRmw^T :iled by the petitioner aggrieved by respondent No. 3 has shifted ?ange to Tongapal Range on special ent No.4 has been posted. |the petitioner submits that the ^taram Range only on 11 montlis s(Jiccessiou, he has been shifted. He \4 has been posted, who is only a r the petitioner further submitted his work. ioner Ironi one rauge to other raoge shows fhat the petitioner has been ;ies. Considering fhat the Divisional Forest Ofiicer on the petiitioner liberty to appr^ach order has been passed by the 12.7.2011, I deem it proper to give the Chief C^nservator of F'orest ~r XI-HC—7& ^s^ ^ww^, ^tily4i(o, [®i<ni<r}^< •Wtf^lT »*1|cb "^ 200 ^^^^ ( ylfl^^) ^TI^T'^T f<^Jeb ^T^TT ^TI^T 9bHi<=h Pra^een ^<TTW^f^T ^TT^T z- with a representation on fhe said representation of tlie Chief Conservator of Forest in ^tated groimds iu the petition. The pe4itioner shall be considered by fhe kccordance with law. In case fhe petitioner i Conservator of Porest^ he such remedy as may be ife a^rieved by tlie order of CMef woi^ld be at Uberty to take recourse to to him under the law. availal5le With fhe aforesaid ob disposed of« ^ervations^ the petition is finally Certified copy as per rul^s. CM^f<n4IT1 'HPT^ff ^* fex<rt ipsi^K ^3tRTH371^T Sd/- ManindraMohanShrivastava Judge J,....