IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-12-2007 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN W.P.No.36644 of 2007 P.Ravichandran .. Petitioner. Versus 1.The Secretary to Government Agriculture Department, Chennai-9. 2.The Director, Director of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 3.Thantai Roover Institute of Agriculture and Rural Development, Elambalur, Perambalur. .. Respondents. Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation, dated 1.11.07, in accordance with law within any stipulated period of time as the matter is pending for order from 1st respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Venkatesan For Respondents : Mr.N.Senthil Kumar Government Advocate https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ O R D E R Mr.N.Senthil Kumar, the learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents. 2. With the consent of the learned counsels appearing on either side, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that he had submitted a representation, dated 01.11.2007, to the respondents and the respondents had not passed any orders thereon, as requested by the petitioner. 4. However, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents had pointed out that the first respondent by his proceedings No.X/K/F/vz;/jPrhjp2- 173275-07, dated 09.11.2007, had intimated the petitioner that his request is forwarded to the Government for taking necessary action. 5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 01.11.2007, in view of the communication of the second respondent, dated 09.11.2007. 6. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 01.11.2007, on merits and in accordance with law, expeditiously. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 01.11.2007, to the first respondent, along with a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. csh Sd/- Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst.Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To 1.The Secretary to Government Agriculture Department, Chennai-9. 2.The Director, Director of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 3.Thantai Roover Institute of Agriculture and Rural Development, Elambalur, Perambalur. +1 cc to The Government Pleader Sr.No.73217. KM(CO) DCP/13.12 W.P.No.36644 of 2007 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/