1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Criminal Application No.760 of 2007 M/s. Suzlon Enerzy Ltd. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Mukesh Pabari for applicant. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP for State. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. September 5, 2007. P.C. . Heard Mr.Mukesh Pabari, the learned counsel for the applicant - company and the company has impugned the order dated 25/1/2007. The application submitted for return of property was just taken on file and it was kept open for consideration subsequently while deciding the main case i.e. Case No. 105/PW/05. Mr.Shitole, the learned APP has pointed out that the case arising from C.R.No. 29 of 2005 came to be registered as Case No.105/PW/2005 and the said case has been finally decided by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 16th Court, Ballard Pier, Mumbai as per his judgment and order dated 27/2/2007. The accused have been acquitted and in view of the pendency of Notice No.42/N.05, enquiry has been directed about the muddemal articles for disposal. 2 It is, therefore, claimed that this application has become infructuous and the applicant will have to take out appropriate proceedings in the pending notice. . The application is, therefore, disposed as infructuous with liberty as is available in law. (B.H.MARL