IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No 1195 of 2011 Beauti Kumari, daughter of ShriShatrughan Sah, resident of village + Post - Sirshi, PS – Nanpur, District – Sitamarhi. Presently under illegal confinement of her grandfather Shri Ramjas Sah, son of late Chulhai Sah, resident of Mohalla – Gaispur, PO + PS – Pupari, District – Sitamarhi - Petitioner Versus 1 The State of Bihar 2 The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna 3 The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna 4 The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Muzaffarpur Range, Muzaffarpur 5 The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi 6 The Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi 7 The Station House Officer of Pupari Police Station, District – Sitamarhi 8 The Station House Officer of Nanpur Police Station, District – Sitamarhi - Respondents 01st Set 9 Satrughan Sah, son of Shri Ramjas Sah, resident of village + Post – Sirshi, PS – Nanpur, District – Sitamarhi, father of petitioner 10 Ramjas Sah, son of Chulhai Sah, resident of Mohalla – Gaispur, PO + PS – Pupari, District – Sitamarhi, Grand father of petitioner 11 Kanhai Sah, son of Shri Ramjas Sah 12 Bara Babu Sah, son of Shri Ramjas Sah, residents of village + PO – Pupari, District – Sitamarhi, Uncles of petitioner - Respondents 02nd Set ---------------------------------- 2 15.12.2011 We are not convinced about the bona fides of this writ petition. It is filed by one Beauti Kumari claiming to be daughter of Shri Shatrughan Sah and alleging that she is in illegal detention of her father and her grandfather who are restraining her because she wants to marry. She states that she has not pursued regular studies but from Janam Kundly, her date of birth is 01.01.1993 and, as such, she is a major. This writ petition has been sworn by a co-villager Diwakar Jha who is, admittedly, not in any manner related to the petitioner. The vakalatnama petitioner has signed in English which shows that she is 2 educated. How she managed to give the vakalatnama and through whom it was received by the learned counsel and what is his relationship with the petitioner is also uncertain. It is for these reasons we are not satisfied with the bona fides of this writ petition and do not intend to entertain the same. It is dismissed accordingly. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh) (Ashwani Kumar Singh)