IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 17TH JULY 2008 / 26TH ASHADHA 1930 LA.App..No. 713 of 2008() ------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 07/04/2003 IN LAR. 83 /1990 & LAR.93/1990 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM .................... APPELLANT: RESPONDENT --------------------- STATE OF KERALA. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENTS: CLAIMANT --------------------- RAHUMA BEEVI HAJIRA BEEVI, T.C.48/450, KARIYIL PUTHUVAL PUTHENVEEDU, AMBALATHARA. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON I.A.NO.1761/2008 DISMISSED 17-7-08 Sd/-, PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE /True Copy/ PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C.M.Appl. No. 826/08 & L.A.A.No.713 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of July, 2008 JUDGMENT As already noticed by me on 14/7/08, the respondent claimant is entitled for land value fixed as per Ext.A2 since Ext.A2 case was also covered by the very same section 4(1) notification and the Land Acquisition Officer has treated the properties in that case to be of the same value as properties in this case. Registry on verification has reported that though L.A.A.NOs. 708/96, 812/96 and 739/96 were filed by the Government respectively against L.A.R.Nos. 41/90, 48/90 and 91/90 ( the cases covered by Ext.A2) all those appeals have been dismissed. Under the above circumstance, in view of the finality attained by Ext.A2, no useful purpose will be served from the Government point of view by admitting this appeal or by condoning the delay. Delay petition will stand dismissed. The appeal will stand rejected consequently. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE sv.