nE!BSA!5 J-'^ <^^r'. IN 'EHE HIGH COCR'El^E' CHEIA'ITISeARHAI^ILASMUiL w^a: ia'7%(KM /^. Pefifioner ^. ---;- Versus Restiondents mi^i —^.1(iw;'ugS" iP'<'T.I*' ,:;.f Ramesbwar (jope S/& Bbagir^U, .aged a&out §^ years, EP Etectintciart A Kqrasi^eottieiy S^EL Dist: Korea TK&ehaimian Cym Managmg Director.SECE SeepatRoaS, Bffasput-(C.©,} The GhiefQeaeral Manager SECL Kurasia Arga, Elis£;Korea 'E^ifiy.Manager Perseaal Kurasia Cbtttigry, ]Mst°;Kc!rea ^^-^k -f- XS-HC-22 afi^tw R-iiih SlfiSH: a»<-fRT^^ ^ 't- ^ .4t<{t<'(<t, wctiwre, &w«3<. WRtl «*((<« ~ ^3R ^j^f.jaii^......^.m 200 'fN's^r" it ^R^^^^raR •^r^r 06.02.2004 Shn PrafuUa Bharat, cou|i^l for the petitioner. Shri P.S. Koshy, couhsel Sbl-4f^'t'4l"t tTP^ "^W££l<^iih$K ^ SfftlN 31tS% porrespondents N6. 1 to3. Bythiswrifpetitionuad<|rArticle 226/227 OftheConstttuti.on oflndia fhe pctitioncr has ch^Ilenged the orderdated 22.08.2003 (Aimexure P-8) passed by fhe{ Managcr, (Personne^ Kurasia Area, Distnct Korea whereby fhe pet^ioner has bcen informed fhat hcwUl be retinngon29d>MarcU 2004.| The mam grlevance of ttje petitioner is fhat he was einployed on fhe postof Electriciaa in ftte year 1966 andjoiacd his dutics at Korba CoBieiy, later on, ia f(te year 1969 he was teansferred to CIumuri CoIUeiy area aad du|-mg that period Us original semce rccord was misplaced aiul ine respondents havc recorded his xfy ou thc b^is of assulnption fhe idate ofbirihM 28.03, t944 wifhfmt knowledge of the petitioner. Irijfhfiyear 1990 the petitioner came to tow about this fect fhen 16.07.1990 fhe respondents s^nt a memo, iatunated the petitioner that accordmg to fhe NCWA III | by Iiim. is not recogiuzed hence Ofbirfh. The petitk>hGr agaia ii^ade representations, copy ofwhich is Annexure P-5 & P-6 but fhe sanbe have ateo not beeu considcred. I have heard kamed couc Leamed counsel for the te made a representation and on instructions fhc certificate submltted there would be no chaage ia his date jsel fi»rfhe partfes. oetitioner submits fhat fhe petitioner had received his earty cducati^n in Hazanba^a., Bihar aad hc has submitted a school-leavaig cel|ificate (Aiinexure P-2) in which the date ofbirth of the pctitioncr I^as bccn recordcd as 22.10.1945 but^ L -+ J3£t-He-22- snSvw R'lifi ^S^f ai^W'yi^a f ' Roshan/+ •asr"snwra, ^dtwi^, Piciwii*. *IW?IT (b*liq» •Wl, 200 fhc respondents are aot corTe|ctmg his date d£l>B-th, He further submits fhat as per Clause-^II) of that instruetions in case of appoititees who have piirsuei^ Institution, the date of l)irf|i recorded in fhe School Leaving Certificate, shaU be treated a^ ihstructious; to which karaed | has no objection. Having heard fhe leame| regaid to fhe facts and circuiij IRWfWftt'SW^f'^ ft*A< ft3li^Pt8)ftiit studies in a recognized educational coraect date of birth and the saine wffl not be altered under ac|y circiunstances. Leanied counsel fiufher subxnits that fhis iasl^ziction is not being adhered by fhe respondents. Therefore, fhe cs|se ofthepetitioner inay be referred to fhe Age Detemunation Coijimittee as pfcF-^^Clause-C of fhe x)unsel for fhe respondents No. 1 to 3 1 couusel for the parties aad having .s'tailccs of the case, tUe petittoner is atlowed to inake a representa1|ion before respondentNo.l wifhiu. a period often days fix»mtoday ^nd the respondent No. 1 win refer fhe case before the Age Deteniuii.^.tion Comiuittee fer determination of the age and the Conynittee as |far as possiblc wiU determiae fhe age of the petitioner before his ^late of supcrannuatipu as per the existing recoid and fhereafl|er, based on fhe report of that Coinmittee the respondent sho^iM take decision. The petition is disposed ^faccordingty. Consequenfly, M.W.P. N(^ staad disposed of. Certified copy as per Rul^s. . 166/2004 & I.A. No.499/2004 also Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge r~