IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22899 of 2011 Gaya Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- Lawyer for Petitioner- Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha-Adv. Lawyer for State- Mr. M.K. Khare-A.P.P. ------------------------------------- 04. 12.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of informant Mr. Ajay Nandan Sahay, Advocate, vehemently opposes the prayer of bail. Deceased left his house on a call through mobile, on next date his dead body recovered, voice was of a lady is the allegation. Print out of the call of the deceased mobile was taken to show that the mobile through which there was call to the deceased, is existing in name of the petitioner. Witnesses are there though hearsay to state that there was some affair of the deceased with petitioner’s daughter, is further added by voice of a lady. At this stage, I am not of the opinion to grant bail to this petitioner. Accordingly petitioner’s prayer for regular bail stands rejected. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)