IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4161 of 2011 TINKUL PASWAN Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 07.02.2011 Petitioner is in custody in relation to Bikram P.S.Case No. 25/08 G.R. 648/08 instituted under section 376/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged by the prosecutrix that she was ravished by four persons, petitioner and others are named in the F.I.R but only two persons namely Sanjay Chaudhary and Mukesh Chaudhary were arrested on the spot by the villagers. Petitioner submits that reading of the F.I.R would itself show that the F.I.R had been instituted at the instance of Mukhiya at home. Petitioner and others having serious dispute since the time of conviction , my attention is drawn to the fact that Sanjay Chaudhary who was arrested on the spot and virtually identified by the prosecutrix, had already been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 46067 of 2008 by order dated 16.12.08. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, let above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the J. M. Danapur, in Bikram P.S. Case No. 25/08 G.R.No. 648/08. Namita ( Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)