IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 19TH JANUARY 2009 / 29TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 1060 of 2009(A) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ----------------- P.R.VIJAYAN, ASSISTANT SECRETARY, ARIKUZHA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,NO.1438, ARIKUZHA.P.O, THODUPUZHA. BY ADV. SRI.D.SOMASUNDARAM RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, (GENERAL),IDUKKI. 2. ARIKUZHA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, NO.1438,ARIKUZHA.P.O, THODUPUZHA,IDUKKI DIST.REP; BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER K.C. SANTHOSHKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C) No. 1060 OF 2009 - A ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 19th day of January, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner states that following Ext.P5 judgment, Ext.P6 order was issued by the first respondent, however that, the second respondent has not complied with that direction. It is essentially for the first respondent to look into the complaint of the petitioner. Hence, dispensing with notice to the first respondent and preserving its right to move review of this judgment, the first respondent is directed to ensure that the needful is done. The petitioner's grievance regarding non-implementation of Ext.P1 would also be looked into by the first respondent. Writ petition is ordered accordingly. (THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) KMD