IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. RSA No.2265 of 2007 Date of Decision: October 12, 2007 Raunki Ram and others .......Appellants. Versus Munshi Ram .......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr.Gorakh Nath, Advocate for the appellants. --- S. D. ANAND, J. 1. In a concurrence of views, the learned Trial Court and also the learned First Appellate Court recorded a finding that the plaintiff-appellants had neither been proved to have any proprietary title nor any right, title or interest in the land in suit after the pre-emption decree in respect of that land in favour of respondent attained finality. In the course of the judgment, the learned First Appellate Court noticed that the plaintiff-appellants had not been able to prove that the impugned entries for the period 1990-91 are wrong. It further recorded a finding that there is no evidence to prove that the actual physical possession of the land had been handed over to the plaintiff-appellants. 2. In the light thereof, no question of law, much less substantial in character, arises for determination of this Court. 3. Dismissed in limine. ( S. D. ANAND ) October 12, 2007 JUDGE SRM Note: Whether referred to reporter ? Yes/No