1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. CRIMINAL REVN. APPLN. NO.: 88 OF 2007 *** SHRIRANG SHAMRAO KULKARNI Versus ANJU SHRIRANG KULKARNI AND ANOTHER *** 1. Heard learned counsel Mr. S.S.Naik for the Petitioner. He points out the order impugned in this revision application. It appears that the Respondents had filed petition No.E-88 of 2006 in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Aurangabad on 16th March, 2006. It was an application seeking maintenance under section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. This application was considered, parties were heard, evidence was recorded and learned Judge, Family Court disposed of the application on 28th February, 2007. An amount of Rs.800/- per month is awarded to Respondent no.1 wife and Rs.400/- per month is awarded to Respondent No.2 son from the date of application i.e. 16th March, 2006 towards maintenance. Apart from this maintenance, amount of Rs.500/- is directed to be paid to Respondent No.1 wife towards costs. 2. None appears for the Respondent, despite service. 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders. and Registrar’s orders. 3. Counsel Mr. Naik, on instructions, submits that after decision by the learned Judge, Family Court, in Petition No.E-88 of 2006, petitioner and Respondent No.1 i.e. husband and wife have amicably settled the matrimonial dispute. According to his instructions, it was a petition for divorce under section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act. Statement made is accepted, taken on record. In this view of the matter, Criminal Revision Application stands disposed of. [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.] Dated:19/03/2010. ans/88