WPMS 1907/2006 Hon’ble P.C.Verma,J. Heard Sri Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the petitioners. The respondent No.4 filed restoration application on 21.03.2002 to recall the order dated 24.12.1996 and restore the case. The said application was allowed by Consolidation Officer, Roorkee on 23.09.2004. The appeal filed by the petitioners before Settlement Officer, Consolidation, Roorkee was also dismissed on 12.05.2005. Thereafter the petitioners filed revision against both the orders dated 12.05.2005 and 23.09.2004 before the Deputy Director Consolidation/Assistant Collector, Haridwar. The revisional court found that there is no error of law in allowing the restoration application and the rights of any party do not effect. The revision was dismissed on 31.08.2006 with cost of Rs. 1000/- to the Opp.parties and opportunity of hearing was allowed the parties. The impugned order does not show that it was passed in disregard of principles of natural justice. Also there is no error of law in passing the impugned order. Hence I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed in limine. (P.C. Verma,J.) 24.07.2008 P.Singh