IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.5089 of 2005 Shashi Prasad Gupta, son of Sitaram Gupta, Resident of Umta Railway Station, P.S. and District-Jehanabad. …..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, 2. The District Magistrate, Jehanabad, 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Jehanabad, 4. The Executive Engineer, P.W.D., Jehanabad, 5. The Block Development Officer, Jehanabad, 6. The Circle Officer, Jehanabad…. ….Respondents ……… For the Petitioner : Mr. Shashi Dhar Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Samrendra, S.C.-21 ………………. 3 05.08.2011 Petitioner seeks direction to the respondents not to demolish the portion of his constructed house under the garb of compliance the order dated 24.10.1996 passed by the District Magistrate, Jehanabad in Case No.11/1996-97 for removal of encroachment as the petitioner’s case is that the authorities have already removed the encroachment much earlier and the aforesaid order stood complied thereafter. After some argument, it is submitted that by the several orders in other writ petitions, the 2 petitioners thereof have been granted indulgence for filing representation before the respondent no.2, i.e., the District Magistrate, Jehanabad. Xerox copies of some of the orders, i.e., the order dated 1.11.2007 passed in C.W.J.C. No.5380 of 2005 (Ganesh Prasad Gupta Vs. The State of Bihar & ors.) and the other order dated 1.11.2007 passed in C.W.J.C No. 5039 of 2005 ( Janak Dulari Jaiswal Vs. The State of Bihar & ors.), have been produced. Let the same be kept on record. Petitioner also proposes to file such representation. Learned counsel for the State also submits that the writ petition can be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid orders as the petitioner also proposes to file a representation before respondent no.2, i.e., the District Magistrate, Jehanabad. In above view of the matter, this application is also being disposed of in terms of order passed in C.W.J.C No. 5380 of 2005 and C.W.J.C. No. 5039 of 2005. If such a representation along with the certified copy of the present order including all the relevant documents in respect of the claim of the 3 petitioner is filed within a period of six weeks then respondent no.2 shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months thereafter. In the meanwhile, the encroachment should not be removed beyond the measurement indicated in the order dated 24.10.1996 as contained in Annexure- 2 to the writ application and Annexure-E to the counter affidavit. Accordingly, this writ application stands disposed of. Sanjay-II ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)