IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 3071 of 2010. Decided on: 16th June, 2010. Kumari Lalita. ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and another. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “A. That this writ petition may kindly be allowed, writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued and the respondent department may be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner in a time bound manner and post her at one of station of her choice as per the transfer policy of the State.” It is seen that Annexure P-1, representation is pending before the second respondent. There will be a direction to the second respondent to consider Annexure P-1, representation on merits and adverting to the submissions made therein and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law and justice within a period of one month from the 2 date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of. Dasti copy. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 16th June, 2010 ( Justice Kuldip Singh), (tr) Judge.