IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38464 of 2008 1. NATHUNI MAHTO 2. PARMESHWAR MAHTO 3. RAJESH MAHTO 4. JIRIYA DEVI @ GIRJA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 23/10/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a police case under bailable Sections (144, 447, 323, 554 and 34) of I.P.C. and 3(X) of S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the F.I.R. itself admits a serious land dispute between them. In that background the invocation of the latter Act is only a embellishment to lend further weight put to what is otherwise a land-dispute simpliciter to ensure the custody of the petitioner. The petitioner himself belongs to an extremely backward class. In fact, there is a title suit pending between them also. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within six weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail- bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each along with two - 2 - sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Meenapur P.S. Case No.94/08, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )