IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRIMINAL MISC. NOS.M-31919 & 31920 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 19, 2011 Neeraj .....Petitioner VERSUS Smt.Poonam ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRESENT: Mr. N. C. Kinra, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. I do not see any ground to interfere in the well reasoned orders passed by the Courts. To be fair to counsel for the petitioner, he has very compassionately argued that for the sake of children, who are at the formative years of their career, the petitioner has to make provisions of their education etc. He has an equal responsibility towards his wife. On this compassionate plea, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order. Both the petitions are accordingly dismissed. October 19, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) khurmi JUDGE