CRM No. M-11379 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM No. M-11379 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.5.2009 Shiv Karan ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Senior DAG, Haryana. Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocate, for the complainant. Rajan Gupta, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that bullet injury by the pistol was caused by Vicky Bhadana and not by the petitioner. According to the counsel, the petitioner has been attributed no role except being present on the spot. He emphasizes that main accused in the case is Vicky Bhadana. Learned State counsel (on instructions from ASI Ram Kishan, who is present in Court) submits that pursuant to order dated 14th May, 2009, the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for custodial interrogation. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim order dated 14th May, 2009 is hereby made absolute subject to CRM No. M-11379 of 2009 2 the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE May 28, 2009 'rajpal'