THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1283 of 2009 ORDER: While issuing notice before admission in W.P.No.2001 of 2009, this Court passed an interim order on 09.02.2009, directing that respondent Nos.1 to 3 shall ensure that respondent No.4 does not make any construction, except in accordance with the sanctioned plan. This contempt case is filed alleging that despite the said order, respondent No.4 is making construction and respondent Nos. 1 to 3 did not take any steps. Respondent No.1 filed a counter-affidavit denying the allegations. It is stated that on receiving the complaint from the petitioner, he personally visited the disputed site and when he found that some steps were being taken to lay foundation and basement, instructions were issued to stop them and that no work is going on. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. The petitioner complains that respondent No.4 has commenced the construction, despite the interim orders passed by this Court. However, from the perusal of the counter- affidavit of respondent No.1, it is evident that the construction has been stopped. Hence, the contempt case is closed. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:02.12.2009 kdl