IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 5881 of 2008 Between: S. Danaiah, s/o. late Narsimha, R/o. H.No. 1-142, Lashkar Guda Village, Hayathinagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad East Division, RR District at Goshamahal, Hyderabad. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or directions more in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject lands admeasuring 05 Acres 06 Guntas in Survey Nos. 11/2 & 11/3 of Surmaiguda Village Hayathnagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District, without following due process of law. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.SHASHIDHAR GURUVULA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the respondents are trying to dispossess him from the lands in an extent of Ac.5.06 guntas in S.No.11/2 and 11/3 of Surmaiguda Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District without following due process of law. Therefore, she filed the present writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents not to dispossess her from the said lands without following due process of law. When the matter came up for admission on 19.3.2008, this Court directed the learned Government Pleader to get instructions in the matter. Today, he submits that at present the respondents are not interfering with the petitioners possession of the said lands and that the petitioner has converted the lands into plots and, therefore, the authorities intend to initiate action against the petitioner. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is closed. However, if the respondents intend to take action against the petitioner, they can do so only after following due process of law. N.V.RAMANA,J DT.24.3.2008 msv ... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad East Division, RR District at Goshamahal, Hyderabad. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 4. 2 copies to GP for Revenue, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad. 5. 2 CD copies