IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19265 of 2010 BISHO PATWA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ------ 4/ 25.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Till today the only evidence against this petitioner is confession of co-accused, Mangal Sah and one other co-accused but offence is under Section 395 of the I.P.C. and different nature of evidence is expected after custody of the petitioner, including confession leading to recovery and test identification parade. So, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. However, petitioner is directed to surrender before the Court below and pray for regular bail. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)