IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:7943 of 2001 Between: The Harijan Fishermen Coop.Soceity, Rep. by Sri B.Mathaiah, S/o. Chengaiah, Panapakam harijanawada, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Fisheries Department, Chittoor. 2 The Divisional Forest officer, East Division, Chittoor. 3 The Forest Range officer, East Division, Chittoor. 4 The Forest Section Officer, Panapakam Section, Secretary to Vana Samrakshana Samithi, Panapakam Village, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor District. 5 The Vana Samrakshana Samithi, Rep. by its President, Sri D.Kuppuswmy, Arigalavaripalle, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:NONE APPEARED Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: AGP FOR FISHERIES The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is ﬁled for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondnets in interfering with lease hold rights of the Petitioner including issuance of notice dated 9-4-2001, wherein the Respondents sought to conduct Public Auction on 16-4- 2001 as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently set aside the Notice dated 9-4-2001.” On 06.09.2008, when the case was called, there was no representation for the petitioner and, therefore, the writ petition was adjourned for today to be posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. It is, therefore, reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed in default. Even otherwise, looking to the prayer claimed in this writ petition, with the eﬄux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous. On both the counts, the writ petition is dismissed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 8th SEPTEMBER, 2008. kvni