HiGH COURT OF CHHATTfSOARHAtm.ASPUR Criminai Revision SPR1 No.1209 ofM11 ^^^1 ApPiicant (In Jaii) Non-appiicant Abdui Kadir S/o Abdui Karim, Aged about 40 years, R/o Ratanganj, Infront of Rashtriya Kirana Store, Main Road, Amaravati, P.S. Nagapuri, Amaraysti (Maharashtra) Versus StaSe of Chhaffisgarti, Through - Poiica Station - Keshkal, District ~ Jagdalpur (C.G.) (Criminal Revision under Section 397 read with Section Wl of ttie Cr.P.C.) (SB: Kon'bie Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.) MrA/imlesh Bajpai, counse! for the sppiicant. i Mr.Rakesh KumarJha, Dy.Govt.Advocate for the non-appiisantfState. ORDER iORAU (Passed on 10m March, 2011) 1. By this revision, the appiicant has challenged t^faiity and propriety of the order dated 3.1.2011 passed by She Specisi Judgs unrisr Narcofic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Aci, Jagdalpur in Speciai Case No.29/2010, wftereby the Court beiow has framed the charge for the offencs punishabie under Sections 20 (b) (ii) (C) and 25 of the iSiarootic Drugs and Psychotropte Substances Aci, 1985 (for short 'fts Act') against the appiicant owner of truck. 2. Registry has pointed out default. 3. As per order impugned and copies of other decuments, tmck was found unattended within the territoriai jurisdsction of Poiice Stetien Keshkai, DisttJagdslpur and 91 bags containing contraband articie ganja v/as found in ths said truck. Matter was investigated and finally charge sheet wses fiied against the present applicant slong with other accused persons. 4. Report iodged by wte of the appiscant dated 31 .8.2009 to Poiics Staiion Nagpuri Road, Amravati revsais that they havs ciaimed ttiat truck was stoion on 18.8.20re in the premises of brother of th®appiicant which was informed by brother of the appticant to him on 29.8.2CX®,but they have iodged the aforesaid wrUen complaint to Poiice Station Nagpuri Road, Amravati on 31.8.2i»9 i.e., after seizure of truck. 5. Materiai coiiected on behalf of prosecution prima facie sufficient for drawing presumption that ths present appiicant aiong with other accused persons were 'sSS^ '^tssS1' ^ %aS^ 'f~rsVa^:3£^^ - 2-— transporting/carrying alieged confraband articies sn huge quantity. On ths basss of aforesaid materiai the Court beiow has not commitied any iliegaifty in framing of charge. 6. Consequsntty, the revision is liable to fse dismissed and it is hereby dismisssd. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^\/