1 BA 413-2011 Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.413 OF 2011 Bashir Mohamad Yusuf Patel .Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.433 OF 2011 1. Gulzar Haji Ahmed Patel .Applicants 2. Abdul Haji Ahmed Patel 3. Mohammed Saeed Haji A. Patel V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.297 OF 2011 1. Abdul Rehman Shabuddin Patel .Applicants 2. Mohammed Hussain Shabuddin Patel V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.266 OF 2011 1. Noorjehan Ismail Tamboli .Applicants 2. Akhtari Hamid Madar 3. Almas Asgar Khot V/s. The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.A.P.Mundargi, Sr. Counsel with Mr.Ajay S. Patil, for the Applicants Mr.Rajendra Sorankar i/b. Mr.O.A.Siddiqui, Advocate, for the Applicants in Cri.Bail Appln.No.433 of 2011 2 BA 413-2011 Mr.Rajendra Sorankar i/b. Mr.O.A.Siddiqui, Advocate, for the Applicants in ABA No.297 of 2011 Mr.Y.M.Nakhawa, APP, for the Respondent  State Ms Alpa T. Javeri, APP, for the Respondent  State in ABA Nos.297 & 266 of 2011 Mr.Uday Warunjikar, Advocate, for the original Complainant in all matters CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 8TH APRIL, 2011 P.C. . Anticipatory Bail Application Nos.297 & 266 of 2011 are not on board. 2. Mentioned. 3. Taken on board. 4. Criminal Application Nos.413 & 433 of 2011 are for regular bail and Anticipatory Bail Application Nos.266 & 297 of 2011 are for anticipatory bail by accused, who have either been arrested or apprehend arrest in connection with C.R.No.5 of 2010 for the 3 BA 413-2011 offence punishable under Sections 419, 420, 465, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered with Kharghar Police Station, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad. I have heard the learned Counsel for the applicants, the learned APPs and the learned Counsel for the first informant. It seems that there is a dispute as to whether the applicants are heirs of one Abdul Rahim alias Rahiman Mohammed Sayyed Patel, who was an appellant in an Appeal pending before the High Court and the respondent in cross Appeal filed by the State in respect of a judgment and decree in a land reference. While the learned Counsel for the Complainant states that the Complainant and his family members are the sole heirs of the said Abdul Rahim alias Rahiman Mohammed Sayyed Patel, the applicants in applications for anticipatory bail claim that they are the sole heirs of the said Abdul Rahim alias Rahiman Mohammed Sayyed Patel. Those who seek regular bail also claim 4 BA 413-2011 to the exclusion of from other groups that they are heirs of the said Abdul Rahim alias Rahiman Mohammed Sayyed Patel. One of the groups, who claimed regular bail, has obtained Death Certificate from Tahsildar. One of the groups i.e. members of the family of the persons, who seek anticipatory bail, have filed an application under the Bombay Regulation VIII for Heirship Certificate which is pending before the Civil Court at Panvel. 5. The learned APP as well as the learned Counsel for the Complainant are right in submitting that the Tahsildar has informed the police officer that one of the Death Certificates produced by one of these groups is false and forged. All the same, this in itself would not justify rejection of applications of the applicants. 6. In view of this, Criminal Application Nos.413 & 433 of 2011 are allowed. Applicants 5 BA 413-2011 in Criminal Application Nos.413 & 433 of 2011 be released on bail on their furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs.25,000/- each with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs. 25,000/- on the condition that they shall report at the Kharghar Police Station, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad on the 1st Sunday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. for the next three months and thereafter, on the 1st Sunday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. till the trial is over. 7. Criminal Applications are disposed of. 8. The applicants in Anticipatory Bail Application Nos.297 & 266 of 2011 be released on bail on their furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs. 25,000/- each with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.25,000/- on the following conditions. (i) The applicants shall report at the Kharghar Police Station, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad for interrogation on 11th April, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. and thereafter, for 6 BA 413-2011 the next three months on the 1st Sunday of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. till the trial is over. (ii) The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. (iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. 9. Anticipatory Bail Applications are disposed of. . The order will remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if charge sheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the Judgment of the Supreme Court dated 2nd December, 2010 delivered in Special Leave Petition (Cri.) No.7615 of 2009 (Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State of Maharashtra And Ors.). (R.C.CHAVAN, J.)