1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1273 OF 2003 IN IN IN SUIT NO.1199 OF SUIT NO.1199 OF SUIT NO.1199 OF 2001 Siraz Abdul Hussein Contractor & ors. Plaintiff versus Mohd Farid Abdulla Saudagar & ors. Defendants ... Mr. S.W.Kulkarni for Plaintiff. Mr.P.N.Patwardhan for Defendants. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 1st April, 2005. DATED : 1st April, 2005. DATED : 1st April, 2005. P.C:- P.C:- P.C:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This motion is taken out by the defendants for setting aside of an ad interim order passed by this court on 28th November, 2002 in Notice of Motion No. 864 of 2001. 2. Ad interim order was passed on 28th November, 2002 2 and the present motion has been taken out on 19th April, 2003. Delay in taking out the motion has not been satisfactorily explained. 3. Even otherwise, I do not find any reason to modify the ad interim order passed by this court on 28th November, 2002. Receiver was appointed by the said order. Receiver has already taken symbolic possession of the premises on 17th December, 2002. Thereafter, the defendant no.1 was appointed as agent of the receiver and has already executed a royalty agreement. 4. Though receiver took symbolic possession on 17th December, 2002 the defendants in any event became aware of the appointment of the receiver and yet did not move the court for four months and that delay is also not satisfactorily explained. Even otherwise, I do not find any reason to modify the ad interim order passed by this court. Hence, Motion is dismissed. D.G.KARNIK, J