( $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 51 + W.P.(C) 7171/2010 ANIL KUMAR Petitioner Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate versus ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS Respondents Through Mr. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate With + W.P.(C) 7175/2010 BAL KISHAN SHARMA Petitioner Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate versus ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS Respondents Through Mr. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate T With 56 + W.P.(e) 7176/2010 JAYANTI PRASAD Petitioner Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate versus ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS Respondents Through Mr. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate With 57 + W.P.(C) 7177/2010 VIJAY KUMAR Petitioner Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate versus ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS Respondents Through Mr. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate With 58 + W.P.(C) 7178/2010 JAI PAL Petitioner Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate versus c ADDITIONAL COMMSSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS Respondents Through Mr. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate And 59 + W.P.(C) 7179/2010 MANOHAR LAL AHUJA Petitioner Through Mr. S.K. Sinha, Advocate versus ADDITIONALCOMMSSIONEROF POLICE ^ AND ORS Respondents Through Mr. N. Waziri with Mr. Shoaib Haider, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER o/o 26.10.2010 1. Notice.Mr. N. Waziri,learnedcounselacceptsnoticeon behalfofRespondents. 2. It appears to this Court that the only reason why the licenceshave not been grantedto the Petitionersis that they do not have no objectioncertificate('NOC') • ^ A from the Fire Department.The Fire Departmentdid in fact inspecteach of th^ Petitioners' shops and had Usted out certain defects. It is not clear whether the inspection report of the Fire Department was communicated to each of the Petitioners. 3. For avoiding any further delay, this Court directs that within next two days each of the Petitioners will attend the office of the Station House Officer ('SHO'), Police Station Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi and get a copy of the inspection report of the Fire Department in each of the Petitioners' cases. It will be open to the ^petitionersto rectifythe defectswithinnext one day thereafterand reportbackto the SHO about having rectified the defects. The Fire Department will thereafter undertake another inspection of the Petitioners' shop and deliver an NOC or otherwise to the SHO within one day thereafter. t 4. If the Petitioners, are still aggrieved by the decision of the Fire Department not gkhting licence for any reason, it will be open to them to seek appropriate remedies, includingappearingbefore the Joint Commissioner,Delhi Police, that may be available to them in law. 5. The petitionsare disposedof in the aboveterms. 6. Orderbe given dasti underthe signatureof the CourtMaster. S.MURALIDHAR, J OCTOBER 26, 2010 rk