1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8776 OF 2009 Satara Zilla Sahakari Krishi Gramin Bahu Uddeshiya Vikas Bank Limited. ....Petitioner vs Satara Zilla Sahakari Krishi Gramin Bahu Uddeshiya Vikas Bank Karmachari Sangathana. ....Respondent Mr. Milind Deshmukh for the Petitioner. Mr. Vijay Patil for the Intervenors. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2010. P.C. :- 1. According to the Petitioner, after the impugned order was passed, the circumstances have changed. This contention is based on the order and judgment of the Supreme Court dated 24th April, 2009. The impugned order is dated 25th March, 2009. The Petitioners contend that pursuant to the said order, the State of Maharashtra has issued a circular dated 26th June, 2009 to the effect that the employees of the 2 bank, who are actually working, should be paid additional index dearness allowance from 1st April, 2002 in thirty-six instalments with salary from July, 2009. It is contended that the decision of the Supreme Court is applicable to all the District banks, including the Petitioner. 2. The Intervenors have denied this contention. The Intervenors contend that the judgment of the Supreme Court does not apply to the Petitioner which is a District bank. It is further contended that the circular has subsequently been withdrawn by the State of Maharashtra by a subsequent circular dated 30th October, 2009. 3. It is not necessary to consider the rival contentions. If, according to the Petitioner, the impugned order is affected in any manner by virtue of the order and judgment of the Supreme Court, they must make an application to the Industrial Court for modification thereof in view of the order of the Supreme Court. If, indeed, the order of the Supreme Court has the effect of rendering the impugned order ineffective and the Petitioners act accordingly, it is always open to any aggrieved party to challenge the said action as well. 3 4. With the above clarification, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Needless to say that all the contentions between the parties in any proceedings are kept open.