IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 7873 of 2010 Date of decision : 28.03.2011 Nirmal Kumari .....Petitioner VERSUS Union of India and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH Present: Mr. Naveen Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Malhotra, Advocate, for HPCL. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioner has filed this writ petition for seeking direction to quash the order dated 25.2.2010 (Annexure P-6), whereby the application of the petitioner for allotment of Petrol Pump at Village Bhadas, District Mewat, Haryana, has been declined. The grievance of the petitioner is that during earlier assessment, there was different marks for the offered land, whereas now the petitioner has been assessed in a manner, whereby she could not even score minimum 50% marks required for the allotment of a petrol pump. Counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to earlier assessment, where the petitioner was given 52% marks after assessment. The marks obtained for land were 'zero' in both the assessments. In the reply filed by the respondents, it is disclosed that Civil Writ Petition No. 7873 of 2010 -2- there were only two applicants for this site and finally both have not scored even minimum required marks and hence, they were not found suitable. The site has not been allotted to any one. It is not disputed that the petitioner has scored less than 50% marks, which is the minimum requirement. The respondents can not be forced to consider allotment even if none of the candidate is suitable. There were only two applicants and the site has been deferred for consideration for lack of competition. There is nothing wrong in the approach, which would call for interference. The writ petition is dismissed. March 28, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE