ssp 1 PIL 179 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.179 OF 2010 Ashok Ukaram Bodha .....Petitioner versus Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation and Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.J.S.Chandnani, for the petitioner. Mr.S.M.Kamble, for respondent No.1. Ms.S.S.Bhende, AGP, for respondent Nos.2, 3 and 5. CORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR & A.A.SAYED, JJ. DATE: 14th FEBRUARY, 2011. P.C. : 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent No.4 i.e. Town Planner, has granted 12 development permissions beyond his powers. Considering the grievance of the petitioner, we direct respondents i.e. respondent No.2, Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Govt. of Maharashtra, as well as the Commissioner of the respondent No.1 Corporation, shall consider the grievance of the petitioner and to find out whether the grievance of the petitioner is genuine or not and after holding appropriate inquiry in this behalf, the concerned respondents may take appropriate action within a period of four months from today. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to send a copy of the above PIL to the Principal Secretary, Urban Development ssp 2 PIL 179 of 2010 Department as well as to the Commissioner of the Corporation, with a copy of this order, so that the appropriate action can be taken considering the grievance of the petitioner and to find out whether there is a truth in the grievance of the petitioner. If there is a truth in the grievance of the petitioner, appropriate action may be taken against the erring persons forthwith. 3. In view of what is stated above, the Public Interest Litigation is disposed of. 4. In case the petitioner has any grievance after the decision of the State Government or by the Corporation, it will be open to the petitioner to adopt fresh proceedings in accordance with law. It is for the respondent-Corporation to see that whether any interim directions are required to be given against those persons who are making illegal constructions and if it is found that they are making illegal constructions, the Corporation may pass appropriate interim order in this behalf. ( A.A.SAYED, J. ) ( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J. )