IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2369 of 2009. Decided on: 20.5.2010 Sant Ram …. Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr.Justice V.K.Ahuja, Judge For the petitioner: Mr.Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr.Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General and Mr.J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate General. V.K. Ahuja, J.(Oral) The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner on the ground that he had completed 240 days in each calendar year since 1984 onwards, however, he alleged that due to sickness, he could not complete 240 days in the year 1988, which fell short by 2-1/2 days and short by 12 days in the year 1992, for which he had submitted medical certificates, which are required to be considered by the respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the present writ petition may be treated as representation made to respondent No.2, who may consider the same and pass appropriate orders on the same in accordance with law. 2. In view of the above submissions, a copy of the representation, alongwith a copy of this order, be submitted by the petitioner to respondent No.2 within 10 days from today and thereafter, the said respondent 2 will decide the same within a period of two months and convey the orders accordingly to the petitioner. If the petitioner is aggrieved against the said order, he may seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. The petition is allowed accordingly to this extent and the same stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. Dasti copy. May 20, 2010 (V.K.Ahuja) (TILAK) Judge