IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 14TH KARTHIKA 1931 RP.No. 1087 of 2009(J) -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.6817/2007 DATED 13/03/2007. .................... PETITIONER/ NOT PART TO THE WRIT PETITION: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- GEORGE JOSEPH, S/O. GEORGE MORRIS, MANNITTAYIL, CHURCH ROAD, SAKTHIKULANGARA, KOLLAM. BY MR.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE, ADV. MR.S.SUJIN. RESPONDENTS/ WRIT PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. SEBASTIAN G. MORRIS, 102A, SUTI SUMMIT, E.R.G. ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI – 682 014. 2. THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, OVERSEAS BUSINESS CENTRE BRANCH, WILLINGDON ISLAND, KOCHI -682 003. 3. THE CHIEF MANAGER, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, OVERSEAS BUSINESS CENTRE BRANCH, WILLINGDON ISLAND, KOCHI – 682 003. R1 BY ADV. MR. SANTHOSH MATHEW, R2 & R3 BY MR. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, S.C. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/11/2009,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: prv. THOTTATHIL B RADHAKRISHANAN, J. -------------------------------- R.P.No. 1087 OF 2009 -------------------------------- Dated, this the 5th day of November, 2009 O R D E R ~~~~~~~~~~ Counsel appear on either side. After hearing the learned counsel for parties, it is noticed that the apprehension of the review petitioner is that the judgment sought to be reviewed may be used against the review petitioner in different litigations that may be pending between the parties or that may arise between the parties. It is clarified that the judgment sought to be reviewed does not bind any of the parties, on the merits of the rival claims. Review Petition is ordered accordingly. THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHANAN, JUDGE ps