IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 11137 of 2008. Decided on: 21.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Uttam Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he had been working uninterruptedly since 1991 till 2003 and completed 240 days in each calendar year. A bare perusal of Annexure R-1 substantiates the case of the petitioner. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization immediately after completion of ten years for conferment of work- charged status, within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner in view of the law laid 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - down by their Lordships of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 21, 2010. (sck).