IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26224 of 2009 ANISH KUMAR BARNWAL @ ANISH BARNWAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2 26.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is admitted to learned counsel appearing for both the parties that a police case was filed making allegation of demand and torture for its non-fulfilment. Later a matrimonial case for restitution of conjugal right was filed on behalf of husband. Anyhow both the cases compromised that goes to show that the wife was making the allegation for demand and torture and the husband about desertion. Anyhow the matter reconciled. Now learned counsel submits regarding the complaint which was filed later that after taking the girl after reconciliation, the family members are demanding more than earlier in name of expenses of the litigation which prima facie appears even a torture caused by the wife by misusing the provision and privilege given to her. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner shall - 2 - be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Daya Lal Prasad, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in Complaint Case No. 3900/07, Tr.no. 3097/09, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. As prayed for, let this order be communicated through fax at the cost of the petitioner. (Mandhata Singh,J.) AI