FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CA/17482/2010 ANITA V/S STATE ... Shri S.M.Vibhute, Advocate for petitioner Shri V.H.Dighe, AGP for respondent No.1 Shri R.P.Fhatke, Advocate for respondent No.2 and Shri K.C.Sant, Advocate for respondent No.3. ... 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. This is an application seeking clarification of the order dated 23.9.2010 and for direction to respondents 6 to 8 to issue University Internship Completion Certificate so also the Degree Certificate to the applicant. 3. Vide our order dated 24.8.2009, we had granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause (H). Perusal of prayer clause (H) would reveal that we had directed the declaration of result of the petitioner for III M.B.B.S. examination. Not only that, but by a subsequent order dated 23.9.2009, we had also directed respondent University to give Internship Completion Certificate to the applicant. In that view of the matter, we do not understand the conduct of the respondent University in withholding the Internship Completion Certificate and the Degree Certificate. 4. Civil Application is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) with costs quantified at Rs.10,000/- (Rs.Ten Thousand only/-) to be paid by respondents 6 and 7 to the petitioner. Contd.....2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders. COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS (2) CA/17482/2010 5. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the petitioner is not interested in costs and the same be paid to the High Court Bar Library, Aurangabad. Respondents 6 and 7 shall, therefore, deposit the costs with High Court Bar Library, Aurangabad within a period of two weeks from today. On failure to deposit the said costs, Registry shall issue notice to respondents 6 and 7 as to why action should not be taken against them for committing contempt of the Court. 6. It is needless to stay that if respondent University finds that imposition of the costs is due to some unsustainable conduct by any of its officers, the University would be at liberty to recover the costs from such officer / officers. (R.M.BORDE, J.) (B.R.GAVAI, J.) Dt.10.12.2010 akl