IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7606 of 2010 KAILASH PRASAD YADAV, S/O LATE CHHOTE LAL YADAV, R/O PAPAREWA,P.O.-BANIAKURA,P.S. KATORIA,DISTRICT-BANKA. --- Petitioner Versus 1. THE T.M.BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR. 2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR,T.M.BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 3. THE REGISTRAR,T.M.BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 4. THE FINANCE OFFICER,T.M.BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 5. THE PRINCIPAL, J.R.S. COLLEGE, JAMALPUR,DISTRICT-MUNGER. 6. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, MAIN SECRETARIAT,PATNA. 7. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 8. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 30.4.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-University as also the State. It is submitted that consequent upon the retirement of the petitioner as a University Professor on 31st of August, 1996 from J.R.S. College, Jamalpur, he has been paid the retiral dues. However, consequent upon revision of pay scale, still the arrears of some of the retiral dues have not been paid despite representation dated 6.3.2010, as contained in Annexure 5. Learned counsel for the respondent-University submits that the representation filed by the petitioner is not specific and clear. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the 2 Registrar of Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur (respondent no.3). In case such a representation is filed stating distinctly the details of the unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation may be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. However, upon consideration, if any of the claims or part of the claims is found not admissible, the same shall be informed to the petitioner with the reasons thereof. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)