IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 5TH JULY 2011 / 14TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 18090 of 2011(I) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- FAHAD V.A., AGED 21, S/O.ABDUL SALAM NAZAR, VATHUKKAPARAMBIL, MULAVUKADU P.O., KOCHI, PIN-682504. BY ADVS. SRI.P.N.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR SRI.P.VISWANATHAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KALAMASSERY, KOCHI, PIN-682022, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KALAMASSERY, KOCHI, PIN-682022. R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,COCHIN UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.18090/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF MARKS OBTAINED FOR THE PETITIONER FOR THE B.TECH DEGRE VTH SEMESTER EXAMINATION HELD IN JULY 2010. P2:- COPY OF THE DUPLICATE RECEIPT ISSEUD BY THE MODEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE REGARDING THE CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT OF FEE, DTD. 30.6.2011. P3:- COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF MARKS FOR THE B.TECH DEGREE VIII(FINAL) SEMESTER EXAMINATION. P4:- COPY OF THE DUPLICATE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE MODEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE REGARDING THE CERTIFICATE OF PAYMENT OF FEE DTD 4.7.2011. P5:- COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY SENIOR MANAGER, WIPRO TECHNOLOGIES, BANGALORE. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE tss ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ---------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 18090 OF 2011 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of July, 2011 J U D G M E N T Petitioner completed B.Tech Degree Course. When the results of 5th and 8th Semester examinations were declared, he had failed in two papers. He applied for revaluation and approached this Court complaining of delay and seeking orders to expedite the revaluation. 2. I heard the Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University. 3. Having regard to the above, I dispose of the writ petition directing the University to complete the revaluation sought for by the petitioner within 4 weeks of production of a copy of the judgment, provided the application for revaluation has been received and is otherwise in order. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before the 2nd respondent for compliance. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE ul/- [true copy] P.S. to Judge