:1: FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.40 OF 2005 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders. of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.O.A. Siddiqui for the Applicant. Mr.T.K.Sinha for the Respondent No.1. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J. DATED : 24/3/2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. In view of my order dated 16.3.2006, parties have filed joint application styled as consent terms which is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. One of the prayer made in the said consent terms is that the matter is settled and the offence may be permitted to be withdrawn. The said application worded as consent terms. However, indicates that the parties want to compound the offence. The complainant Dr. R.P. Yadav is present in the court and he confirms that the matter is settled. The :2: conviction is under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act which is a compoundable offence. As the matter is settled out of court, permission is granted to compound the matter. In view of the compounding of the matter, accused stands acquitted. (R. S. MOHITE, J.)