In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CWP No. 8464 of 2008 Date of decision:20.5.2008 M.E.S.Workers Union ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Shailendra Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** JUDGMENT M.M.KUMAR, J. The instant petition is directed against the letters dated 7.1.2008 and 29.1.2008 (Annexures P-20 and P-21 respectively) sent by the Registrar of Trade Unions and Labour Commissioner, Haryana, Sector 17, Chandigarh denying the existence of petitioner- Union as per their records. It is claimed that the aforementioned letters have been issued without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner-Union and without reconstructing the record. However, a perusal of letter dated 29.1.2008 (Annexure P-21) shows that the petitioner-Union was given opportunity and it has not been able to produce the certificate of registration bearing registration No.16 or the Constitution of the Union duly certified by the then Registrar, CWP No. 8464 of 2008 -2- Trade Union. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner-Union has the whole record in its possession, although the photocopy of the registration certificate is available with him. After hearing the learned counsel, we find that a number of disputed question of facts are likely to arise for which the forum of writ jurisdiction may not be proper for adjudication. The petitioner- Union may avail the remedy of filing a civil suit where all disputed facts could be ironed out and finding could be recorded after adducing the evidence. Accordingly the writ petitioner is relegated to the remedy of Civil Court. (M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE (SABINA) May 20, 2008 JUDGE anita