IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17642 of 2011 Dr.Anmol Mishra , Wife of Late Naresh Mohan Mishra, Resident of Mohalla Sipahi Tola, P.S. Khazanchi Hat, District Purnea. ... ... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura through its Registrar. 3. The Vice Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura. 4. The Registrar, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura. 5. The Vice Chancellor, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga. 6. The Chancellor of the Universities, Bihar, Raj Bhawan, Patna. ... ... Respondents. ---------------------------------- 5. 18.10.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Prabhu Narayan Sharma, learned A.C. to learned Advocate General, who appears on behalf of respondent no.1/State of Bihar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2, 3 and 4/B.N. Mandal University and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.5/L.N. Mithila University. The petitioner, who retired on 31.10.2009 as Professor from Purnea Mahila College, Purnea under B.N. Mandal University, has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of Provident Fund, Gratuity, Leave Encashment and also for revision of her pension. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though petitioner retired in the year 2009, till 2 date, all the retiral dues have not been cleared, for which the petitioner has also approached the authority concerned by filing detailed representation. However, neither any decision has been taken on her representation nor all the retiral dues have been paid or pension of the petitioner has been revised. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that writ petition can be disposed of granting liberty to lthe petitioner to approach the authority concerned again. The prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner has not been disputed by learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the stand taken by the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3/Vice Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, respondent no.3 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of two 3 months from the date of filing of such representation. If respondent no.3 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, respondent no.3 is required to pass a speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. It goes without saying that the petitioner shall be entitled to get admissible statutory interest on delayed payment. With above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)