R.S.A No. 1370 of 1982 ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.S.A No. 1370 of 1982 Date of decision : August 26, 2009 Sher Singh and others, ...... Appellant (s) v. Smt. Raj Pati ...... Respondent(s) *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Vinod S.Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. C.B.Goel, Advocate for the respondent. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This appeal has been filed against concurrent judgments of the Courts below decreeing the suit of the respondent that she had inherited the property of Smt. Dakhan her step mother. The only question of law proposed by counsel for the appellants is that once the execution of the Will was proved the mere fact that its subsequent registration was not proved could not be held against the appellants. In my opinion, this is also a question of fact, since both the R.S.A No. 1370 of 1982 ::2:: Courts below have not only not accepted the Will because of lack of proof of due identification before the Sub Registrar but also because of other suspicious circumstances surrounding its very execution. Counsel for the appellants has not been able to persuade me that the findings recorded with regard to the execution of the Will are either based on no evidence or are based on such misreading of evidence so as to render the same so perverse as to justify interference by this Court under Section 100 of the C.P.C. Consequently, holding the question proposed against the appellants, this appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. ( AJAY TEWARI ) August 26, 2009. JUDGE `kk'