IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 9029 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision: May 21, 2010. Raspal Singh ...... PETITIONER Versus State of Punjab ...... RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr. Vivek K.Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed for regular bail under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR No.126 dated 28.12.2009, under Sections 420/406/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Kapurthala, District Kapurthala. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been continuing in custody since 28.12.2009. It is further CRM No.M-9029 of 2020 contended that case is triable by Magistrate and the same is not likely to be concluded in the near future. Learned counsel for the State, on instruction from HC. Baldev Singh, has not disputed these facts. However, it has been stated that co- accused is yet to be arrested. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Hence, keeping in view these facts and without expressing any opinion on merits, the instant application for regular bail filed on behalf of Raspal Singh is allowed. Bail to the satisfaction of CJM/Duty Magistrate, Kapurthala. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) May 21, 2010. JUDGE 'om' 2