-HC—78 WMWI thNl^t 'S^ •<ii<(icit|, sxily'Ko, fqciiyy (Y<dX- \°^^]Q\' ""^.200 3n^[Tra?? (1pf3^T) 3^1 W h-U* ^V STT^T sttiiq) l^tiw ^rf?a an^i APPLICANTS: PETiTIONERS 1. Pijran 2. Adhhelal abbut 60 RESPONDENTS: {Petition for restorat Sinale Bench: Hon'l 18.7-2008 A.K. Prasad, counsel Torlthe Mr. Rakesh Verma, counsel Heard leamed counsel for tti|e The appticants' petltion (M.F^. Court vide Qixler dated 23-8-2005 1|or The contention of the aprficants tt>f<llfl<fll 'HTO?ff "if t^st <F*l^l< ^sifinsn^r Lal Sonkar, S/o. Bhaiyalal, Aged years Sonkar, S/o Chudaman, Aged ab[3ut 60 years, Bcjth R/o Badabazar, Chirmiri, Tah. ^nendragarh, District Korea (C.G.) Versus- 1. Tl^e State of Madhya Pradesh, Through th^ Secretary, IVIines Resou'c^ D^partment, Bhopal (M.P.) 2. Cc|llector, Sarguja at Ambikapur 3. Mihes Offteer, Distt. Sargup at Af|ibikapur. 4. M^nager/Deputy ChieT Mines Engineer, Ki|rasia Colllery Kurasia, Distt. Sarguja (C|.G.) (Now Distt. Korea, C.G.) onofM.P.No. 3738/1^} Mr. Justice L.C. Bhaloo yie applicante. for fte respondent No.4. eparties. '.No.3738/1992) was dismissed by ftis non-prosecution. is that on the same day l.e. 23-8-2005 they reached the Court, E>ut before tney couia reacn *e udurt, '-HC—78 ~3^ '*iwwi\, yfll'y'is, [sidi'My ^ww Vhw* W^200 3TI^?t T1°W (l^id'l'l1') sn^r ^ii R-fi'k ^TT 3TT^T sit*llch ^ <til<<[Ml1'1 ^IWlf ^f 'fs^t <Fi|«^l< ^sTfOTan^r the petition was dismissed. Therefore, on the same day they applied for certified copy ofthe dfsmi^at ord^r and the instant applicatton was also prepared. The same was filed on p-9-2005. Perusal of the M.C.C.sh()ws that the apptteants have shown sufficient cause for absence, ther^fore, I am of the opinion ttet it is a flt case to restore the petition to i|:s originat number Accordtngly, the M.C.C. Is atiowed and restore t|ie petition to its original number i.e. M.P.No.3738/1992. Registry is directed to proce^d further. ; Copy ofthis orcter be placsc^ on the record of M.P.No.3738/1992. Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge -2-2.LSLfo_gL