IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH JULY 2009 / 17TH ASHADHA 1931 LA.App..No. 718 of 2009(D) -------------------------- LAR.219/1997 of ADDL.SUB COURT,KOLLAM .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANTS ------------------------ 1. NARAYANAN NADARAJAN, NADUVILA THEKKETHIL, CHITTAYAM, PANAYAM (DIED). 2. SARASAMMA, W/O. NADARAJAN, NADUVILA THEKKETHIL, CHITTAYAM, PANAYAM. 3. SUNIL RAJ, S/O. NADARAJAN, NADUVILA THEKKETHIL, CHITTAYAM, PANAYAM. 4. SINDHU RAJ, D/O. NADARAJAN, NADUVILA THEKKETHIL, CHITTAYAM, PANAYAM. 5. BINDHU RAJ, D/O. NADARAJAN, NADUVILA THEKKETHIL, CHITTAYAM, PANAYAM. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. ------------------------ L.A.A.No.718 OF 2009 ------------------------ Dated this the 8th day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. It is brought to our notice that this court has dismissed L.A.A No.683/2009 arising our of the judgment in L.A.R. No.87/1997. L.A.R.No.87/1997 was in respect of acquisition pursuant to Section 4(1) notification one year subsequently. But the same rates were granted by the awarding officer and the reference court respectively in that case. Having regard to the judgment in L.A.A.No.683/2009, we are of the view that this appeal need not be entertained. This appeal is accordingly dismissed. PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE dpk