IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM NO. M-32919 OF 2010(O&M) DECIDED ON : 16.02.2011 Goverdhan Dass ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. S.P.S.Tinna, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Rai, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate, for the complainant. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate has apepared on behalf of complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record the compromise deed. Learned counsel for the complainant has also stated that he has no objection if the petition is allowed, as the parties have arrived at a compromise. Learned State counsel has also admitted the factum of compromise. So, in these circumstances, the petition for regular bail stands accepted. Bail to the satisfaction of trial Court. FEBRUARY 16, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE