1 Cri-A-3327-10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3327 OF 2010 Gudia Anand Singh ... Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents Mr.Shashikant N.Patil,Advocate, for the applicant. Mrs. A.T.Javeri, APP, for the respondent - State. CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 24th February, 2011. P.C. 1. The application is filed for cancellation of bail in Crime No.243/2010 registered at Bhandup Police Station under Sections 498A, 406 read with Section 34 of IPC. 2. It is alleged that at the time of marriage, the parents of the applicant/first informant had given amount of Rs.3 lakh and gold ornaments weighing 8 tolas to her. Later on, she was being harassed to bring further amount of Rs.2 lakh. It appears that she left the house of in-laws in the year 2007 as her husband went to Dubai. At that time, her ornaments were kept in the locker. In 2 Cri-A-3327-10.sxw March 2010, she returned as her husband was to come back from Dubai and thereafter she was residing at the house of her brother-in-law Umashankar Singh. In May 2010, she again went to her parents' place because her husband was to go back to Dubai. In July 2010, her husband came back from Dubai, but she was not informed. Accordant to her, the ornaments given to her by her parents as Stridhan are not returned and she was ill-treated. Perusal of the FIR shows that only general statements of harassment and also that her ornaments were kept in the locker in the Bank, are made. In view of these circumstances, the trial Court granted bail to the accused persons by the impugned order. I do not see any valid reason to interfere and cancel the bail. 3. Therefore,the application stands rejected. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)