IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3237 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3237 OF 2007 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3237 OF 2007 Abhiranjan Kamaldev Thakur .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtrta and ors...... Respondent. Mr. Sanjeev P.Kadam for the applicant. Ms. Hutoxi Tavadia i/b Himanshu V.Kode for the respondent no.2. Mr. Y.S.Shinde APP for State. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. CORAM; A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED; 11TH DECEMBER, 2007 DATED; 11TH DECEMBER, 2007 DATED; 11TH DECEMBER, 2007 P.C.; P.C.; P.C.; 1. The learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application with liberty to file revision under section 397 of Cr.P.C. before the Sessions Court. The learned counsel submits that the applicant has been prosecuting the remedy before this court bonafidely and hence the time spent for prosecuting the present application need to be excluded while computing the period of limitation while filing revision before the Sessions court. It is obvious that as the applicant has been prosecuting remedy before a wrong forum the time spent by the applicant before this court would be excluded by the revisional court in case appropriate application is filed. Permission granted. Allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Application is dismissed as withdrawn. .....