IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/B) No. 68 of 2010 Dr. Nakli Singh ……… Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others .………. Respondents. Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manoj Sah, Advocate for the petitioner. Date of Judgment: 27-04-2010 JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, C.J. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. J.S. KHEHAR, C. J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that there are some mistakes in the pleadings of the instant writ petition, which need to be rectified. He, therefore, states that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action, after correcting the mistakes. The instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforementioned. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) (J.S. Khehar, C. J.) 27.04.2010 27.04.2010 Amit