1c^ HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BiLASPUR: CHHATT1SGARH SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHR! H.L. DATTU, CJ. W,P,(S)No,5173of20i ENTS Dheiu Ram Kaushai, Panchayat Karmi Sachiv S/o Late Shri Asharu Ram Kaushal, Aged about 45 years, R/o Viliage - Takanpat, Post - Ushari, Tah.- Jagadalpur, District-Bastar(C.G.) StaSe of Chhattisgarh Through Panchayat Secretary, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Sarpaneh, Gram Panchayat Ushari, Tah. - Jagadalpur, Distt. - Bast-ar (C.G.) Dy. Director, Panchayat & Social Welfare, iastar, Distt. Bastar (C.G.) Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for th®petitioner. Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents No. 1 & 3. Nons for the respondent No. 2. Aoih {Passed on 08'" March, The petitioner in this writ petition alieges that the respondents have not paid salary to him. ff fhat is so, in my opinion, at She first instance, the petitioner has to make an appropriate representation before the respondente for payment of saiary and in case hi's representation is not considered and decided, then onty cause of action arises for fiiing a petition before thisCourt. - (2) In that view of the matter, for the present, no action need be taken in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to make an appropriats representation before the respondents for payment of salary. tf such an appirsation is made by the petitioner, the respondents shall consider the same in accordance with law. (3) Consequentiy, M.W.P. No. 601/2007 stands disposed of. Sd/- ChiefJustice ' r