IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A. NO.5954/06, 5955/06, 5956/06, 8424/06 WRIT PETITION NO . 4415/06 ( Dr. Punjabrao Krishi ..vs.. General Secretary) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR, J. DATE : 30th MARCH , 2009 Heard counsel for the parties. By these applications, applicants are praying for being added as respondent in the petition. According to the applicants, they have left the complainant- union and now joined the Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeth Shet Mazoor Karmachari Kamgar Sanghatana. They have filed the registration certificate of the said union along with the said application. Original Respondents has not filed reply these applications. No doubt, this court has earlier rejected such application by order dated 8.12.2008, the fact remains that the present applicants have joined another union and left the present respondent – union. Time was granted to the respondents to file reply. Even last chance was granted on last date. Still no reply is filed. In view of the statement made by the applicants that they have joined the other union and presently respondent can not represent them, these applications will have to be allowed, however without prejudice to the rights of the respondent, if any. All four Applications stand disposed. Suitable amendment be carried out by petitioner in the petition. JUDGE SMP