IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1043 of 2008 ASHA DEVI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2/ 21/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Originally the appointment of respondent No.10 as an Angan Bari Sevika was assailed. The counter affidavit states that after having discovered that respondent No.10 had obtained appointment by misrepresenting with regard to her place of residence, her appointment has been terminated. Once the appointment of respondent No.10 has been terminated, the vacancy stood exhausted and no appointment can be made from the panel from which respondent No.10 had been appointed as it no more existed after her appointment. This writ application is therefore disposed with the observation that if the respondents issue a fresh advertisement consequent to the vacancy arising out of 2 termination of respondent No.10, and the petitioner also applies, her case is required to be considered in accordance with law. Respondent No.10 has been terminated during the pendency of the writ petition. The petitioner had come to the Court in time. The respondents are, therefore, directed to consider the case of the petitioner if she submits her application before the date scheduled for interview. The writ application stands disposed. KC/ ( Navin Sinha, J.)