IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 11981 of 2008 Between: A.Rajasekhara Reddy @ A.Raja Reddy S/o.Jangam Reddy R/o.Eswarnagar, Mahanandi, Kurnool District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Endowments) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Endowments, Tilak Road, Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. 3 Sri Mahanandeeswara Swamy Vari Devasthanam, Rep. by its Executive Officer, Mahanandi, Kurnool District. 4 Gangisetty Janardhana Rao, S/o. Late G. Subba Rao, R/O. Eswarnagar, Mahanandi, Kurnool District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the proceedings of 1st respondent in Rc.No. H2/18306/2008-1, dated 05-06-2008, as bad, illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the lease/licence rules, discriminatory and offends Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India to set aside the same and to direct the respondents to permit the Petitioner to continue as license to sell flowers as per the public auction proceedings dated 25-2- 2008 at 3rd respondent Temple. Counsel for the Petitioner : MR. V.VENUGOPALA RAO Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.11981 OF 2008 ORDER : In view of the order passed by the Commissioner of Endowments, A.P., Hyderabad, dated 13.6.2008, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and therefore the same is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ______________ G. ROHINI, J. Dt. 30.06.2008 gbs