PEYITIONER R E$POND§NTS PETITIONEii hm, Vé QE$?G&DENT$ A ’ _.: F‘ 'n r. ‘ Mr. Pm'ag Kai'esha, Advocafe M abouf 42 aged Q. year's, No.161, 5/0 Rajnandgaon Wm'fer’, R/o Labour Coiony, The 5?a?e of Chha‘ffisgarh,‘ Through: HS séwé’fwy, T'r-i%;a§ Wé$fc3$é Deparfmenf, D.K.S. ghawan, Raipur. h) . Hi9}: Love} Cam‘e‘ 5cm+iny Commii’fee fhrough h‘s Pre3idanf, Pf. beendayal Upadhyay Nagar, 5ec1'or-4, Raipm’. Commissianer. Through W's President, Ti’hbg 61, hivihw Cm‘éii'y‘, Raijiw. § aged abou? 44 R/é Labaur Cabfyy, The Shrie of Chhaffisgarh, Through: §%s $e5—Fémay, TFI‘Ea} Wé}%&% Depari'meaf, D‘K.S. Bhawara, kaipur’ Q. No.1614 Rajfmndgaon l. n). Jmi MF. Sumash Bajaj, Governmaaf Advacai'e ‘ a Seaéin4, §aipua . The CoHec‘i-or, §ajnandgacn I. '_l. nar‘fwgurn 2.x- ~"L‘ 5?ufa - .. gunaub’ge ~'~-J . - T‘kiL- tr'mz Commissioner, Through i’rs Presidenf, For ‘Hve peri‘riomars. For ’rhe 5Mha. QRDER (Passed an N Dhirendm Mishra 3' 1. Heard. of by fhis common order as “rile-issue invo pe‘ri‘Hons is same. However, made 1’0 ‘rhe pleadings made in WP. (c) No.6373/09‘.,r Ived in bofh fhese in “r'his order refarence is being iEai'iesi1 Liviengsi’one, H wo. (c) woo—373 o? moo J‘iwan Liviengsfone, yéd’r‘g, 5/o Waifér‘, . DY! 23” November, 2009) goH coum‘ 0i: CHHATTisaARH AT gILAgPqg gm? {c} Nciésw of zoo? . The Coiiecwr, Rajnandgaon. .Chim'i‘iisgarh $Ta‘ie Scheduio 2. WP‘ (c) No.63oy/09 & mm is) No.6373/09 are being dispwed rra5e Page 2 of 3 ,/ 45 . By This peTi‘Hon Lmdér ArTicie 226’& 227 of The Congfim?ion of India "rhe pefifioner has prayed for quashing of The show cause noTice daTed 27.4.2609 {Annexure P-4) is5ued by resoonden‘f r No.2 whereby Tho peTiTionar has been coilad upon To furnish documen‘i'qr'y ¢§_ om! evidence for esmbiishing his casTa sTaTus as ’Gond'. .Mr‘. KoTecho, iearnad counsei appearing for The peTiTioner3 submi'i's ThaT The peTiTioner beiongs To 'Gond' cosTe, which is noTified as ‘5cheduied Tribe' in The STaTe of ChhaTTisgarh. A casTe cerTificaTe To ThoT effecT has been issued To him by The comgeTehT auThor'iTy Tehsiidor vide Annexure P-l. Respondeni‘ No.4—Commission oh The basis of some compioih‘r agoins’r The peTiTioner had verified The socioi sTaTus cerTificaTe of The peTiTioner and afTer verificoTion heid ThoT efTer due enquiry The Tehsildori Balod, DisTricT Durg has issued The casTe cerTificoTe To The peTiTioner. However; The STaTe High Levei CasTe 5cruTiny CommiTTee i.e. resnondenT r No.2; issued The impugned show-cause noTice To The peTiTioneh along wiTh ihvesTigoTion reporT vide Annexure P-4. InvesTigoTion has been done behind The back of The pe‘TiTioner wiThouT affording any opgorTuniTy To cross-examine The wiTnesses. The peTiTionerhas oiready submiT‘E-‘ed deTaiied reipiy (Annexure P-5) To The Show cause hoTice. Issuance of show cause noTice by The respondeh‘i‘ No.2 is wiThouT JurisdicTioh as reseohdehT No.4 hasaiready verified The sociai sTaTus cerTificaTe of The 9eTiTioner and now iT is noT open To The respondehT No.2 To- re-verify The cerTificaTe of The peTiTioner ahd The some is causing unnecessarv harassmenT To The oeTiTioner. , r .Oh The oTher hand; Mr. Sumesh gageui. iearned GovernmenT AdvocaTe aonearing I‘l— for The 5ToTe submiTs ThaT The 5TaTe has consTiTuTed The High Levei CasTe ScruTiny CommiTTee for verificaTion of The casTe cerTi‘gicaTe and iT is The highesT auThoriTv To verifv ahd deTermihe The social sTaTus of ahv r ., i Page 3 of 3 AC individuai. Show—cause noTice has been issued affer‘ (we invesfiga‘i'Mn and copy of fhe invesfigm‘ion razor-1" has also been supplied To the pe’rifioner. Fmm bare perusal of 5ec+ions 9 & 10 of The MP. Rajya Anusuchh‘ Janja?i Ayog Adhiniyam; 1995 (for shor‘f ‘Adhiniyam'L if is ciear Thu? i? is no? ‘Hne funcfion of The Commission 1'0 verify say casfe cer'i'ifica'ie issued 'ro any individuai with respecf f0 The sociai sfafus. . I have heard learnedrcounsel for The parTies. . The High Levei CasTe 5cruTiny CommiTTee has been consTiTuTed as per guidelines and direcfions issued by fhe Hon'ble Supreme Cour? iii ’rhe ma‘r‘fer‘ of Kumgei Asgdlmrii é’gi’ii é snoi’her ‘isp Acidii’im‘iai Commissioner, Tribai Developmen? £1; c'i’l'ier’s repori’ed in AIIE 199$ 5C 94 ior The purposes of de‘l‘ermining the social sm‘rus of any individual of fhe 5mm; whereas; fine funcfions and powers of ‘ihe Commission is 1‘0 ocf as wofchdog Commission for fhe profecfion of righfs afforded To The members of fhe Scheduled Tribes under f'ne Consfi‘rufion of India and under any other low; From perusal of Seci'ion 9 of The Ac‘ri 1995 if is clear fhof fhe func‘i‘ion of fhe Commission is recommendai’ory and advisory in nofure ‘l’o pnofecf The inferesf of fhe Scheduled Tribes in various fieids and i’rs ads/ice is ordinarilv binding upon The 5ToTe Government , u-l r . Therefore. in The considered opinion of This Court. memo of Annexure P—3 issued bv resoondenT No.4-Commission creaTes I r no bar in verifvina The case cerTificaTe (Annexure P-i) issued ‘ I J To The peTiTioner by The respondenf No.2. .In The resulT, The peTiTions have no subsTance, The same deserve To be dismissed and are acegglingly dismissed aT The admission sTage iTseif. l Sd/- i i Dhirendra Misiu‘a Judge 1E-e. - ~r>