THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH Dated this the 5th October, 2009. Writ Petition No. 21495 of 2008. Between: N.Mohan Murthy. ……….Petitioner vs. 1. The Station House Officer, P.S. Jeedimetla, RR District. And another. ………Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No. 21495 of 2008. ORAL ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in summoning the petitioner to the Police Station and threatening him at the instance of respondent No.2 and making the petitioner to sit in the Police Station for hours together without any crime being registered as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently directing the respondent No.1 not to summon the petitioner to the Police Station at the instance of respondent No.2. The case of the petitioner is that his father Late Bapu Joshi was having extensive immovable properties in and around Jeedimetla including the land in S.No. 104 admeasuring 4397 sq. yards situated at Ramakrishna Nagar, Qutubullapur village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Since some third parties have occupied the above land, the petitioner was constrained to file LGC.No. 114 of 1996 against the encroachers including the 2nd respondent herein and won the case. Pursuant to the Judgment of the Land Grabbing Court, the Special Deputy Collector and RDO (East Division), RR District demolished all the illegal structures over the land in question and handed over the vacant possession of the land to him under a cover of panchanama. The plea of the 2nd respondent in LGC.No. 114 of 1996 was that he was a lessee to an extent of 1000 sq. yards in the said land. Further case of the petitioner is that he entered into an agreement of sale in respect of the above land with one Sai Kumar Reddy and Hussain Babu and received an amount of Rs. 25,00,000/- in the presence of respondent No.2 and since then, the 2nd respondent is insisting that the land should be sold to him and threatening the petitioner with dire consequences. Then he reported the matter to the 1st respondent with all documents seeking action against the 2nd respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that instead of taking action against the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent summoned him to the police station on 23.0.2008 when the 2nd respondent was present in the police station and made him to sit in the police station for more than two hours. Hence, the present writ petition. The learned Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions furnished by the 1st respondent submits that the allegations made by the petitioner in his affidavit are all false and that no complaint whatsoever was received against the petitioner either from the 2nd respondent or anybody and therefore the question of summoning the petitioner to the police station does not arise. He further submitd that the petitioner was never asked to come to the police station or made him to sit in it. No case whatsoever is registered against the petitioner till date by the 1st respondent and that only to settle his personal scores and to prevent the police from taking any action in future if any complaint is against the petitioner, he filed the present writ petition. In view of the categorical denial of the allegations of the petitioner by the 1st respondent, no case is made out to issue any direction to the respondents. The writ petition is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. _________________ G.CHANDRAIAH,J 5.10.2009. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No. 21495 of 2008. Dated 5th October 2009.