1 S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.1462/2005 Kishan Dixit vs. Manoj Kumar Pareek & Anr. 17.4.2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SARRAF Mr. M.C.Jain for the petitioner. Mrs. Nirmala Sharma, P.P. Mr. Sudesh Bansal for respondent no.1 By order dated 27.7.2005 passed by Judicial Magistrate No.22, Jaipur city, Jaipur the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. moved by the petitioner was dismissed which order was challenged by the petitioner by filing a revision petition. By order dated 17.9.2005 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge No.1, Jaipur City, Jaipur the revision petition filed by the petitioner was also dismissed. Feeling aggrieved of the orders of the courts below, the petitioner has filed this petition for permitting him to cross-examine the complainant. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 and learned P.P. After hearing the rival submissions it is ordered that if the petitioner pays Rs.2,000/- to the respondent or deposits the aforementioned amount in the trial court to be paid to the respondent, within a period of two weeks from today, then one last opportunity be given to the counsel for the petitioner to cross-examine the respondent. The petition stands disposed of. (G.S.SARRAF),J. bairwa 2 S.B.Cr.Misc. Stay Application No.1757/2005 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.1462/2005 Kishan Dixit vs. Manoj Kumar Pareek & Anr. 17.4.2008 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SARRAF Mr. M.C.Jain for the petitioner. Mrs. Nirmala Sharma, P.P. Mr. Sudesh Bansal for respondent no.1. Since the main Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been disposed of, therefore, this stay application stands dismissed. (G.S.SARRAF),J.