IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3664 of 2011 REENA KUMARI, W/O GORAKH PASWAN, R/O VILLAGE- DHARKANDHA, P.S.-DINARA, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. ……………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, I.C.D.S., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE COMMISSIONER, PATNA DIVISION, PATNA. 5. THE COLLECTOR, ROHTAS. 6. THE DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, ROHTAS. 7. C.D.P.O., DINARA, ROHTAS. 8. REETA CHAUHAN, W/O VIJAY CHOUDHARY, R/O VILLAGE-VAGADH, P.S.-DINARA, DISTRICT-ROHTAS. ………………RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 01.04.2011 Petitioner is aggrieved by the appointment of respondent no.8 as Anganwari Sevika. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the enquiry was held and in that enquiry it has already been found that her appointment was illegal. However, admittedly, petitioner has not filed complaint against such appointment of respondent no.8, in terms of the Guidelines, before the Collector till now. The appointment of respondent no.8 was made in 2004. Therefore, there is gross delay and laches in the matter. This Court is not inclined to entertain the writ application and the same is dismissed. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)