IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.19064 of 2009 AMIT KUMAR Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 08.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that someone approached the Bihar School Examination Board for petitioner’s registration number which was refused as registration did not at all exist, while original was therewith the petitioner and his appearance in the examination and succeeding in matriculation examination is not disputed, but petitioner did not wait for the case diary which the learned Sessions Judge was intending to call for. It is always expected that merit should be considered by the Court where submission is being made which has not been done in this case. The prayer of the petitioner is rejected with the observation that he should first approach the learned Sessions Judge and bring all the materials on record and thereafter considering all these papers along with case diary, his case shall be decided by the learned Sessions Judge without being prejudiced by this rejection order. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)