HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR No.6288 of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 30.10.2009 **** Gian Chand . . . . Petitioner VS. Arvin Jain . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT **** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? **** Present: Mr. Amit Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner ***** SURYA KANT J.(ORAL) (1). This revision petition is directed against the order dated 17.09.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Ambala Cantt., whereby, application moved by the petitioner-tenant for leading additional evidence has been dismissed. (2). The impugned order dated 17.09.2009 reveals that the evidence of the respondent-landlord was closed on 4th December, 2007 and thereafter six effective opportunities were granted to the petitioner-tenant to lead his entire evidence, which was finally closed under the orders of the Court on 10th February, 2009. The case was listed for final arguments on 24th March, 2009. (3). The petitioner has been moving one after the other applications resulting into repeated adjournments of the case on 06.04.2009, 28.04.2009, 18.05.2009, 29.05.2009 and 28.07.2009. As soon as his application under Order 18 Rule 7 CPC was dismissed on 03.08.2009, he moved the present application. (4). No interference in the impugned order dated 17.09.2009 passed by the Rent Controller, Ambala Cantt., is called for. (5). Dismissed. (SURYA KANT) JUDGE 30.10.2009 vishal shonkar