1 CRA 1029/10 abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2010 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. Narendra Walawalkar, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. G.H. Keluskar for the applicant. Mr. Prashant Patil i/b Mr. U.R. Manapure for respondent no.5. Mr. S.S. Patwardhan for respondent no.3. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 20TH DECEMBER 2010 P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Walawalkar, learned Senior Advocate for the revision applicant. 2. No case is made out in exercise of revisional jurisdiction under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The revision applicant had applied for rejection of the plaint on the ground that this was the second suit and not 2 CRA 1029/10 maintainable. The trial Court has given cogent reasons in paragraphs 8 and 9 of its decision for rejection of the application. The trial Court has held that causes of action for the two suits were different and the parties were also different save and except the defendant no.1. The revision application is rejected summarily. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)