IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 321 of 2008 Keshvanand Bhatt ….. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others …. Respondents Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate Vice Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for the respondent No. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate Vice Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.C. Pujari, Addl. G.A. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for the respondent No. 3. 2. Mr. H.C. Pujari, the learned Addl.G.A. submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner has now become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case submitted the chargesheet against the petitioner before the court concerned on 07/1172008. This fact has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Interim order dated 02.05.2008 stands vacated automatically. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 16.03.2009 Shiv