IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 2111 of 2001 (S/S) (Old No. 35042 of 1999) 1. Sahaj Ram Yadav S/o Jhabboo Lal R/o Village 31, Rajiv Nagar Dehradun (Amin) 2. Mukesh Kumar S/o Late Jyoti Ram R/o Village 161, Saharanpur Road Dehradun (Amin) 3. Sharan Singh, S/o Panch Ram R/o Mathaioo, P.O. Datnoo Via Sahai, District Dehradun (Peon) ……………Petitioners Versus 1. The State of U.P. through Secretary Board of Revenue, Lucknow 2. The Commissioner, Pauri Garhwal Division Pauri Garhwal. 3. District Magistrate, Dehradun. 4. Sub-Divisional Magistrate Tehsil Chakrata, District Dehradun. 5. The Tehsildar, Chakrata District Dehradun. …………Respondents. None for the petitioners. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J None present for the petitioners. 2. Petitioners, who are working as seasonal collection Amins and seasonal collection Peons, have challenged their disengagement. 3. In view of the principle of law laid down in Secretary, State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi, reported in (2006) 4 Supreme Court Cases, Pg. 01, wherein it has been held that the workers on daily wages or the persons who get employed without undergoing regular selection process, should not be permitted to be absorbed or regularised against the constitutional scheme of public employment, this Court is not inclined to issue direction to regularize services of the petitioners, as such, the petition is liable to be dismissed. 4. The writ petition is dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (All pending applications also stand disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) Dt. 21.11.2006 S