IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2342 of 2003 ARUN LAL @ ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA & ORS. Versus PRABHAWATI DEVI & ANR ----------- 10/ 13.5.2009 Counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make correction in the title page of I.A. No. 3009 of 2009. It appears, Second Appeal No. 89 of 2002 was dismissed for default on account of non- compliance of the order dated 12.9.2003, whereunder defect was directed to be removed. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that on account of mistake of his clerk, direction issued under order dated 12.9.2003 could not be complied with within the time granted under the said order, although the direction issued under the said order has been complied with on 29.4.2003. It is further submitted that for the laches on the part of the office of the learned counsel, appellants should not be allowed to suffer. Appreciating aforesaid submission, delay in filing the restoration application is condoned and the restoration application is allowed. Let Second Appeal No.89 of 2002 be restored to its original file and number. Arjun/ (V.N. Sinha, J.)