IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HONLOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.19211 of 2003 Between: P.JANAKIRAMA RAJU S/O SREE RAMA RAJU R/O 58-21-18, BUCHIRAJU PALLEM, VIZAG. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 GOVT OF AP REP BY ITS PRL SECRETARY IRRIGATION AND CAD DEPT., SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2 ENGG-IN-CHIEF(IRRIGATION) I&CAD DEPT ERRAMANZIL, HYDERABAD. 3 THE PROJECTT ADMINISTRATOR CONSTRUCTION CIRLCLE, DOWALESWARAM, E.G DIST. 4 S.SATYANARAYANA S/O LATE NARAYANA MIG-29 MARRIPLAEM, VUDA COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM-9. 5 B.ANANTHA RAMULU H.NO.1-10-235, ASHOK NAGAR, HYDERABAD-20. 6 DR.P.KARUNAKAR RAO R/O 301, INDIRA RESIDENCY, 9-287/12, BALAGI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Memo No.2892/arb.11/2003-4 dated 1-8-2003 of the 1st Respondent and the consequential memo of the R2 dated 5-8-2003 and the letter No.111dm dt-7-8-2003 of R3 as illegal, Arbitrary, violative of the terms and conditions of the agreement and without jurisdiction and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents 4 to 6 proceed with the arbitration. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI D.SUDARSHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEV. The Court made the following : ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. No costs. ____________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J June 24, 2009. KTL/ASP