THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10530 of 2009 Date: 01.03.2011 Between: Vinjamuru Girijana Fishermen Co-operative Society ..... PETITIONER AND The District Collector, Nellore, Sri Potti Sree Ramulu Nellore District and others. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.MURALIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 8: Counsel for the Respondent Nos.9 to 11: AGP FOR FISHERIES The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 7th respondent in seeking information and clarification with regard to Fishery Rights of Kaverivagu Tank of Vinjamuru Mandal, Sri Potti Sree Ramulu Nellore District from various Departments is arbitrary, unreasonable and without jurisdiction and accordingly to set aside the impugned proceedings of the 3rd respondent vide R.C.No.B/111/2008, dated 07.05.2009 as well as the letter of the 11th respondent vide Letter No.Tanks/2009, dated 29.04.2009 and consequently direct the respondents to grant necessary protection to catch the Fish in Kaverivagu Tank of Vinjamuru Mandal, Sri Potti Sree Ramulu Nellore District as per the lease orders granted by the 10th respondent.” At the hearing, Sri K.Muralidhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in pursuance of the directions given under the impugned orders, respondent No.4 submitted a report dated 15.02.2011 to respondent No.2 wherein he has stated that Kaverivagu Tank belongs to Nalgonda Revenue Village and that the fishery rights over the said tank are possessed by Vinjamuru Tribal Fishermen Cooperative Society for the Fasli 1418 and that as the said tank is in dispute, the fishery rights were not given to anybody for the Faslis 1419 and 1420. Learned counsel further submitted that in view of this report, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication and that his client will take appropriate steps for implementation of the said report. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to pursue their rights in pursuance of the above noted report. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, the interim order dated 28.05.2009, granted by this Court, shall stand vacated and W.P.M.P.Nos.13518 and 13519 of 2009 filed by the petitioner for interim reliefs are disposed of as infructuous. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 01.03.2011 va