@ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR w.P.(C) No. 135 of2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearance : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents 1, 3 & 4. Mr. B.P. Sharma, Advocate for respondent'No.5., ORAL ORDER (o1 .o3.2o1 1) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the parties. Mr. Sanjay Kumar submits that the petitioner is the owner and possession holder of the plots bearing Khasra Nos. 394/6, 394/8 and 419/7 situated in PC No. 13, village Tatibandh, Raipur. He submits that respondent No.5 came with a layout and tried to interfere with the possessions of the petitioner over the said lands. Being aggrieved with the said action of respondent No. 5, the petitioner approached to Joint Director, Town and Country Planning, Raipur and the Commissioner PETITIONER Basu Chakraborty, aged about 55 years, S/o Late Shri A.K. Chakraborty, R/o Sector-III Shankar Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS Joint Director, Town and Country Planning, District Office, Raipur (C.G.) 2 Commissioner Nagar Palik Nigam, Raipur (C.G.) 3 The Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ‘ 4 Director, Town and Country Planning, District Ofnce, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5 M/s. Gaurav Promoters and Builders, Through: its authorized authorities Shriram Heritage, Katora Talab, Raipur (C.G.) 2 W.P.(C) No. 135 of2011 Municipal Corporation, Raipur by flling a representation vide Annexure- P/1 and prayed for cancellation of the layout issued in favour of respondent No.5 as according to the petitioner, his said land was never ’ acquired by anybody eise and it was also not transferred by the petitioner to anybody else. Reply on behalf of respondent No.5 has been filed. Mr. B.P. Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.5, submits that earlier a wrong notincation was made in which these Khasra numbers were wrongly mentioned. However it has been finally corrected by issuing an order dated 18.6.2009 and in the said order these Khasra numbers have not been mentioned. The copy of the v’ \- order dated 18.6.2009 passed by the Joint Director, Town and Country t Planning, Raipur has been filed as Annexure—R/5-2. i Since the subject Khasra numbers, for which, the petitioner had made representation and he made a mention in Para— 8.2 of the writ petition, are now not included in the layout of respondent No.5 and the matter appears to be quite clear, i do not deem it appropriate to proceed further in the matter as according to the reply filed by respondent No.5 as also the last order issued by the Joint Director, Town and Country Planning, Raipur (Annexure-RI5—2), now respondent No.5 has nothing to do with the plots bearing above Khasra numbers for which the petitioner has tiled this writ petition. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands hnally disposed of. There shall be no order as to cost. Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge r; vatti