1 CRA 439/2009 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.439 OF 2009 Srushti Sangam Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. And Anr. ...Applicants. v. Mrs. Menaka Pravin Pillay and Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. I.S.Thakur, adv. For the Applicants. Mr.P.G.Pravin, adv. For the Respondent No.1. Shri P.G.Pravin-in-person-respondent no.2-present in Court. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : AUGUST 25, 2010 P.C. 1 After the lengthy arguments on the question as to whether suit filed by the plaintiffs/respondents is susceptible to the monetary valuation, the learned counsel for the plaintiffs/respondents makes a statement that plaintiffs will withdraw the suit from the City Civil Court and shall file appropriate suit before the High Court after making appropriate valuation However, he wants that the protection, which is presently given to him against termination of the contract by the defendant/applicant may be continued for a period of about 8 weeks from the date of the return of the plaint. In view of this statement made on behalf of the plaintiffs, the learned counsel for the defendants/revision 2 CRA 439/2009 applicants does not want to press the revision application. 3 Therefore, revision application stands disposed off as not pressed. The respondents/plaintiffs shall be allowed to withdraw the suit and to file a suit before the High Court on the basis of same cause of action after making appropriate valuation. Interim relief, restraining the defendants from terminating contract entered into with the plaintiffs, shall continue for a period of 10 weeks from this date. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)