iC- HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR W. P. No.2458of2003 Petitioners 1. 2. 3. Jabal Singh, S/o Nandurarn, R/o Village Janjgir, Tah. Gharghoda, Distt.Raigarh (C.G.) Jageshwar, S/o Chaitan R/o Village Nagramunda, Tah. Gharghocla, Distt.RaigaFhtC.G.) Shobhan S/o Jhaglu R/o VHtage Tapranga, Tah. Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Versus Respondent State of ChhatBsgarh, Through-The Collector, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PET1TION UNDERARTIGLE 226/2270F THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Satish K. Agnihofri Shri Ashok Das Vaishnav, Advocate with Shri Sameer Sahu, Advocates for thepetitlonere. Shri Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate forttie respondent. ORDeR (Passedon this 18th dayofJurie, 2007) 1. The case of the petitioneis is that they are in possession of the lands, which virere in pbssession of their predecessors. The possessions of the lands in questiwi have been uninterrupted and continuous. The petitioners are presently woridng as Kotwar. The petitioners claim Bhoomiswami righls over the lands which have been granted by the competent authority to thetrpredeeessore, prior to 1950. 2. Learned counset for the pefitioners submlts that the facts and question of law invoh^ed in this petiUon, aswelt as the reliefsoyght, are similar to that of in W.P. No. 341 of 2002 (Fatte |Singh and ottiere Vs. The State of ChhatUsgarh & ottiere), which was dlsposed :•:.'.""•cFKVaSS^^Ss.5a»*a!*=^"'' 1 I: 1 .! .>.^ of by this Court vide order dated 22nd February, 2007, in the fotlowing terms:- "In the resutt, this petitipn is disposed of wBh the direction fliat the competent authority shall consider the case of the prtitioners for grant of Bhoomiswami right, in accordarwe with law after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the concerned parties, within a period of three months from the date ofrecei^ <rf a copy ofthisorder." 3. Learned counsel appearing for ihe respondent/State does not dispute the above fact. 4. In viewof the above, this petition stands disposed of in terms (rfthe order dated 22.2.2007, passed by ttiis Court in W. P. No. 341 of 2002 (Fatte Singh and others Vs. The State <rf Chhatti^arh & ottiers). No order asto costs. •' SA'- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Thakur