Crl. Misc. No. M-14997 of 2010 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-14997 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: 23.08.2010 Damanpreet Singh ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..........Respondent BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Abhijat Gaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Rawat, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate for the complainant. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. The present petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail has been filed on behalf of Damanpreet Singh in case FIR No. 67 dated 29.3.2010 registered under Sections 323,324,326,506, 148,149 IPC at Police Station Model Town, Ludhiana. Notice of motion was issued on 20.5.2010 and while issuing notice of motion, following contention of learned counsel for the petitioner was recorded:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in the FIR the petitioner has been named as Tinku whereas the name of the petitioner is Damanpreet Singh and has been alleged to be armed with base-ball but he has not caused any injury. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner was Crl. Misc. No. M-14997 of 2010 (2) granted anticipatory bail by the trial Court and joined the investigation but subsequently his bail application was dismissed. Learned counsel also submits that his co-accused has filed an application for anticipatory bail wherein notice of motion has been issued for 14.7.2010 and arrest has also been stayed.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been named in the FIR as Tinku, whereas, his name is Damanpreet and the only allegation against him is that he was armed with base-ball. No specific injury has been attributed to the petitioner and the main accused has already been released on bail. Learned counsel for the respondent-State on instructions from ASI Harsukhdev Singh submits that now Section 326 IPC has been deleted. Without commenting anything on the merits of the case and the fact that main accused has already been released on bail and nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner and Section 326 IPC has also been deleted, petitioner-Damanpreet Singh is directed to surrender before the Investigating Officer and furnish bail bonds and surety bonds to his satisfaction. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. August 23, 2010 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE Note:-Whether this case is to be referred to the Reporter .......Yes/No