1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.66 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2160 OF 2009 Chandu Tulasidas Pahuja .... Petitioner Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr. .... Respondents Shri P.N. Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Ms V.S. Gharpure for the Respondent- MCGM. CORAM: J.N. PATEL AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATED: MARCH 29, 2010 P.C: 1. Heard. This notice of motion is taken out by the original petitioner seeking a direction against the respondent-Corporation to comply with the order dated 14-12-2009, passed in Writ Petition No.2160 of 2009. 2. The petition was filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus against the respondents directing them to demolish illegal and unauthorised construction carried 2 out by respondent No.2 and the other members of the Managing Committee so as to restore the building to its original status in accordance with the approved plan by the BMC i.e., the society building being M/s. Atlanta Co- operative Housing Society Limited, Evershine Nagar, Malad (West), Mumbai-400 064, and for other ancillary reliefs. 3. This Court on the stand taken by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Corporation, accepted their statement and disposed of the petition by observing that the Corporation shall take action in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. 4. It is informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in spite of making such a statement before the Court on 14-12-2009, the Corporation has failed to take any steps in the matter, without any justification. It is submitted that the petitioner also reminded the Corporation of its statutory obligation and sought compliance of the order passed by this Court and as there was no response, the petitioner has taken out the present notice of motion. 3 5. The learned counsel appearing for the Corporation submits that the Corporation would take necessary decision in the matter within six weeks from today. We, therefore, dispose of this notice of motion with the direction to the respondent-Corporation to comply with the statement made by the learned counsel that they will treat the writ petition as a representation and after examining the disputes stated therein, will pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The notice of motion stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms with costs. J.N. PATEL, J. A.P. BHANGALE, J.