IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.2066 of 2009 SHAHAB TANWEER @ SAHAB TANWEER @ SABU, S/o Syed Sharfuddin Ahmad, R/o Milki Mohalla P.S. Arrah Town, District Arrah ……. Petitioner Versus BIMAL PRATAP SINHA @ VIMAL PRATAP SINHA, S/o Brajendra Prasad Sinha, R/o Ramna Road, P.S. Arrah Town, District Bhojpur …. ` Opposite Party For the petitioner: Mr. Ata-ul Haque, Advocate For the O.P. : Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay, Advocate ---- 5 21.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite party. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this civil revision to avail any other remedy if available under law in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society, Nagpur v. Swaraj Developers and others, reported in (2003) 6 Supreme Court Cases 659 and Surya Dev Rai v. ram Chander Rai and others, reported in (2003) 6 Supreme Court Cases 675, holding that the civil revision filed against an order interlocutory in nature, would not be maintainable. Learned counsel for the opposite party does not raise any objection. - 2 - In the above view of the matter, the Civil Revision is dismissed as withdrawn. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)