IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No: 20737 of 1999 Between: 1 M. Parvathalu, [Died per L.R.'s. Petitioners 2 to 4] S/o. Butchaiah, R/o. Gundrampally Village,Chityal Mandal,Nalgonda District., [ Petrs. 2 to 4 are brought on record as LRs of deceased Petitioner No.1 as per Court Order dated 23.2.2004 in WPMP.No. 3342/2004]. 2 Smt. M. Mallamma, W/o.Late M. Parvathalu, R/o. Gundrampalli, Chityala Mandal, Nalgonda District. [ Petrs. 2 to 4 are brought on record as LRs of deceased Petitioner No.1 as per Court Order dated 23.2.2004 in WPMP.No. 3342/2004]. 3 M. Venkatesam, S/o.Late M.Parvathalu, R/o. Dilsukhanagar, Hyderabad. [ Petrs. 2 to 4 are brought on record as LRs of deceased Petitioner No.1 as per Court Order dated 23.2.2004 in WPMP.No. 3342/2004]. 4 M. Srihari S/o. Late M. Parvathalu, R/o. Gundrampalli, Chityala Mandal, Nalgonda District. [ Petrs. 2 to 4 are brought on record as LRs of deceased Petitioner No.1 as per Court Order dated 23.2.2004 in WPMP.No. 3342/2004]. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep., by its Regional Manager, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 2 A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by its Divisional Manager, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 3 A.P.S.R.T.C., Rep. by its Depot- Manager, Kodad, Nalgonda District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate Writ ordr or direction, preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for an alternate suitable post in the services of A.P.S.R.T.C. as illegal, arbitary and contrary to law and further Direct the Respondents herein to appoint the Petitioner in an alternate suitable post, in Kodad Depot, A.P.S.R.T.C. with all consequential service beneﬁts there to forthwith and pass such other or further orders as are necessary. Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.CHALLARI NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.B.G.UMA DEVI The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition has come up for hearing on 08-09-2008 and as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, it was posted to today ‘for orders’. Even today, when the matter is called out, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. ----------------------------- R.SUBHASH REDDY, J 9th September 2008 CVRK ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies