IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.7525 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 17.12.2009 Mukhtiar Singh .....Petitioner versus Gursharan Singh and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.S.P.Soi, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- ORDER Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner-defendant is aggrieved at the grant of repeated opportunities by the Civil Court, Nakodar, to the respondent-plaintiffs to lead their evidence. Seven opportunities are said to have already been granted to the respondent-plaintiffs to lead their evidence. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the view that no litigant can be permitted to take liberty with the process of law and the Court, in its endeavour to decide every case at the earliest would grant only reasonable opportunities to the parties to lead their respective evidence. C.R. No.7525 of 2009 (O&M 2 Keeping this in view, the revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned trial Court to see that not more than two or three opportunities are granted to the respondent-plaintiffs to conclude their entire evidence and if so required, at their own responsibility. Dasti. 17-12-2009 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE