IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7142 of 2010 SATYA PRAKASH @ GIMMI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 12.5.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, informant was in search of service purchased by cash and co-accused Kiran Jaiswal was distributing such service stands on equal footing. Petitioner is shown accompanying Kiran Jaiswal, so refusal of anticipatory bail to this petitioner is not justified. In the facts of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in Sabaur P.S. Case No. 13 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)