1 wp11623.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11623 OF 2010 _____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________________ Mr. C.R. Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner. 1. Contention is that the respondent-wife who is B.H.M.S. doctor, herself is earning and application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act filed by her, does not contain plea that she has no source or independent income. I have perused that application. In paragraph 6 she has stated that the financial condition of her father is very bad. The tenor of averments, therefore shows that she does not get any support from her parents. 2. Learned counsel contended that in F.I.R. lodged by respondent, the respondent has stated that she is having private practice. However, in reply filed opposing the application under Section 24, the petitioner himself has stated that the respondent is taking private tuitions. 2 wp11623.10 3. The Court below has granted interim maintenance of Rs. 3,000/- to wife. The petitioner himself is B.A.M.S. doctor. I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere in the Petition. It is made clear that the observations of this Court are only for the purpose of considering the controversy prima faice and shall not influence the trial Court while deciding it finally on merits. Petition is therefore rejected. (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE. 13.01.2011 gas/wp11623.10