IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13893 of 2011 TABAREZ ALAM, SON OF LATIF MIR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE JHARWA, P.S. HARSIDHI, DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 13.6.2011. Heard Shri Vijay Shankar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Anil Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The petitioner is in custody in Sessions Trial No.36 of 2011 arising out of Sangrampur P.S. Case No.7 of 2009. The F.I.R. was lodged against unknown. During investigation, petitioner named transpired as per confession made by accused persons including one of the co- accused namely Nasir Ekbal. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed Annexure-2 to the petition whereby co-accused Nasir Ekbal vide Cr. Misc. No.34256 of 2009 along with Irsad Alam in Cr. Misc. No.29227 of 2009 was granted bail by this Court. In view of the fact that the person, who disclosed the name of the petitioner, has already been granted bail, there is no reason to deny the prayer for bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner 2 above named be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 7th Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran at Motihari in Tr. No.36 of 2011 arising out of Sangrampur P.S. Case No.7 of 2009 with a condition that on each and every date, the petitioner shall remain physically present before the trial court, failing which his bail bond shall stand automatically cancelled. However, in special exigency with prior permission of the trial court, the petitioner may remain absent on a particular date. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)