HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY C.R.P.No.2875 of 2010 ORDER: This revision petition is directed against the order dated 28-04-2010 in I.A.No.214 of 2010 in O.S.No.106 of 2000 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Jagtial, wherein, the said application, filed by the respondents herein, the plaintiffs, under Order VII Rule 14 (3) CPC was allowed granting permission to file certain documents subject to proof and relevancy. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the record. 3. The respondents herein fled a suit for permanent injunction restraining the petitioner-defendant from interfering with their possession and enjoyment of an extent of Ac.3.18 guntas in Sy. No.272 and an extent of Ac.0.22 guntas in Sy. No.273-A situate in Chilwakodur village. The petitioner-defendant filed a written statement contesting the suit. After settlement of issues, the trial of the suit was commenced with the examination of P.W.1. At that stage, the respondents filed I.A.No.214 of 2010 seeking permission to file certain documents viz., 1. C.C. of pahani for the year 1999-2000, 2) C.C. of pahani for the year 2008-2009, 3) C.C. of deposition of the petitioner- defendant in O.S.No.1317 of 1992 filed by him and 4) C.C. of deposition of L.Sanjeev in the said suit and the Certificate of sanctioning electricity motor issued by the Additional Assistant Engineer providing service connection to the well, situate in the suit land. 4. The petitioner-defendant filed a counter opposing the application on the ground that the documents sought to be filed are not relevant and the same are inadmissible in evidence. By the impugned order, the learned Junior Civil Judge permitted filing of the documents observing that the proof of relevancy would be decided at the time of final judgment. 5. Admittedly, the documents 1 and 2 i.e. pahanees do not relate to the suit land situate in Sy. Nos.272 and 273-A, but they relate to some other land in Sy. No.269 belonging to some other person. Hence, they are not relevant for the purpose of present suit which is filed for injunction in respect of the schedule land situate in Sy. No.272 and 273-A. Documents 3 and 4 i.e. the depositions of the petitioner- defendant and L.Sanjeev in some other suit O.S.No.1317 of 1992, cannot be straight away admitted as evidence as the said persons are admittedly alive. It is open to the respondents-plaintiffs to confront the petitioner-defendant and L.Sanjeev in their cross-examination, if they are examined as witnesses in the suit, with their earlier depositions in O.S.No.1317 of 1992. They can seek permission of the Court to file the document No.5, sanction certificate, issued by the Additional Assistant Engineer in respect of electric motor affixed to the well situate in the suit land, but however it can be received in evidence subject to its proof and relevancy. 6. Admittedly, in earlier application, I.A.No.22 of 2009, the respondents-plaintiffs were not permitted to file the electricity bills relating to the said service connection. It does not however come in the way of filing the sanction Certificate and the same can be received subject to proof and relevancy. 7. Thus, the impugned order is modified to the extent stated above granting permission to file document No.5, Sanction Certificate, with liberty to file the C.C. of depositions of the petitioner-defendant and L.Sanjeev at the appropriate stage, and refusing permission to file the C.C. of pahanees in respect of land in Sy. No.261. 8. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of as stated above. No order as to costs. ________________ 20-09-2011 kvr