XI-HG—78 ^ A.- ?sf '^l'^ld'M, aifll-a'is, fqc'ii'yy,< fte-i). ?P^~^ iS^n^S^ /^ WWI (hHiqi 200 SfI^T IR^ (ipfsp^q) sf^i w R-ii<<i '^WT 3TT^T sh*lich •..'•'"/ ^ TOIIW ^Hftg sn^i DB: HOyBLE 8HW DHIRBMDfcA MISHRA AMD HON'BLB 8HRI DIUP RA.OaAItBB DESHBainOI. JJ APPELLAWT United Divisional Chowk, IndBa Versus RBSPOHDBNTES 1. 2. 3. 4. Insuraace Co. Ltd. fhrough R^anager, Krishna Coiapkx, Kcchahari il^ur, Dtett. Raipur Ral^ur, 5. 6. Ram Sii^|i, 55 ycars Gh^ia 52 years Gaucsli 15 years, AU R/o. (CG) Poshan about 25 Arjunda, Kapil aged Palari, Mansha viU^e Gunderdetu, B^l, W/o Shri Ram Singh, aged about i 1 S^ii^h, S/o SluiRain Siugh., agpil aboul [Minor t&rough piardiaa Ram Singh) fvillagc Nandai, Dtett. Rajnaitdgaon lAl. REVIEW / MODIFICA'nOM OFl 13-8-a008 Shri H.S. Patel, Advocate,| Shri Anup Majuindar, Ad^ Heard on M.C.P. No. 231; dclay m. filmg of this revisfon a^ ^elay of 153 days. <ftNltn<fli Mt^^l' ^ fsl<;l ^^x ^aifinsn^i , S/o SIiri Paataa Siogh, ayed about S/o Shri Thaa Singh HaJba, aged lycars, R/o villagc Hatlgahan, Thaua 'yehsil Gundeidehi, Distt. Dui^ (CG) Sahu, S/o Shri Udala Ram Sahu, 35 years, R/o willage and Post Gurur, Distt. Dui% (CG) pain, S/o Shri Chain Siagh, R/o l^idgahan, Thana Arjimda, Tehsfl Distt. Dui^ (CG) APPUCATION IWDER ORtBR XLVII RULB 1 OF CPC FO& Kunltar abotit 35 Thtoa QmatR DATED 17-1-al)06 »AB8BD IN M.A, IBO. 637 OF 2QQ5 for the applicant. '. fia- resporKlcnt No. 5. /2006, appUcatfon for condonation of thc same has becn preferred wifh a aii^r ^av !S[-fi<t WK sni^ ?h^ii<* ffi i';t \. ffi ^. 3^ "4i<<id<4, y-al'H'is, f^cii'yy p.4--M° ••^i^/is, "Wf2N sn^i ''RI^ (^fs^^) l^nw oftn sn^r aBowbi pa^sed Notopposed. The appUcation is With the consent of t) finaUy. This appBcation has dated 17th Jauuary, 2006 2) whcreby thc award passed] it has been held that thc app^ Rs. 3,90,000/- wittt mterest| claim petitfoa tin paymcnt. Leamed counsel for fl perusal of the unpugaed lypographical enor crcpt in S3,09,000/-°, ^ure '3,90,000j The above fact is no< respondent. In that view of the directed that in placc of page 3 of fhe order, it should| The petition is Sd/- Dhu'endra Mishra Judge t, The dday is condoned. tfie parties, the application -was heard Deen figijire cni^Ict^l 'RW^ff ^? 'feTSt <pq^K '^'sfRRSTI^T filed for inodification of the ordcr in M.A. No. 637/2005 (Anmxure A- by the Tribunal has becn modified and i^Daats claunaats are cntiflcd to a sum af lat the rate of Rs. 6% fix>in fhe date of l|he applicant submits fhat fix>m bare lorder, it would bc evMent fhat a Ific order dated 17-1-2006 as in placc of '-' has been typed. dteputed by learaed counsd for flic inlatter, n^atter, fhe pctitionTs aBowed aad it is '3,90,000/-' appearing m pm-a 4 at |be read as *3,09,000/-'. accordi4gfy dispmrfjiE—-—~~ Sd/- .. - DUip Raosaheb DeshmUkh Judge wSvi IH*T vmvxi. 'rarcnR —FS/I97—3/2008—io,ooo.