IN THEHIGH CQUKTOI''CHHAniSGAKH : BILASPUK Writ Petition No. 1755 of 2005 Petitioner Dhamiendra Sineli, Aged about 35 years, S/o LahEani Singh, R/o 614, Sundar Nagar, Raipur, Mexaber of Sundai' Nagar On}1! Nim?.3j1 Pr^t'h.St^'nik S-Si^sl^^n Ssnstli0. IVlaiyaui.t, Kaipur, unnatusgarn. Versus Respondcnts 1. Slate of CIuiatusgai-h, Thiuugh the Secretarv, Departtuent ot Co-operative Soqieties, D.K.S. Bha'van, Mantralaya, Raipur, CllJiattisgarll. . T<^IT>+ I?<=»Tric*'(~rvaT' f^^\-i^-r\e^~r^~s't~itTf» Ci<-t/^>-i<a"t~i<ac ]\[pKT3-t~ ,^.tw» ^A, <->-JL < ^-^^/ ~^r •^J^-^JL. 1-^- ^^t. V ^-/ l^/^^'^-.'-L^/ -^A.^/1-/ ^ 11 ^JL<-^ Paachayat Bhawaa, Opp. Laigaaga Shopping Coiaplex, Raipur, CIlhattisgaA. 3. Siuiuai' Nagai Grili Ntnuau Frauianuk Sahakari SaasUia Maryadit, 'I'hrougti its Chairmaii, Suiidar Nagar, Raipur, A Society registerea unaer tue CniiatUsgarn Karot'n7fs Qr><~>i<at"*<c'c A<^+ 10^0 TT3i7irt<y .^l-^-^-^.^i..t.U.tl ^- .^••^^^.•—^^^•^, ^s.^^ A^.^^., ^^^-u^^^^ registrauon No. GRPRPR-29. WRn'^ Pt£rfrQM U MUEK AK'llCLy_2^b/^Z.OKTHE (SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmbotnd.] QT-t-n Ss^iis-v K. Af^si^vol.* Adyocsts ^vitls. Sl^.x^i. Sci.u.r^bh. s^fiTm0 Advocate tbr the petitioner. Shn Shashaals: I'halsur, Panel Lawyer tor the rcspondents No. 1 & 2. Shil Ashok Soni, Advocate tbr the responclent No.3. Q.R D E R (Passed on fhis 26th Day ofNovember, 2008) TJiis petition is laainly again.st a private cooperative soclety. On query, wtiether a writ is niaintauiable ^aiast a pnvate party, learaed counsel subiaits that tiie order whlch is impugaed lierein, iias Deen approved. by Uie Goveminent i.e. donit Registrai', thus tlle peution is inauitaiaable. On perusal ot liie papers/docuiaents, it is evident that no order has been passed by tfae Joiat Kegistrar. Only ttie resolution dated '28.2.WJ3, passed by the Managui^ ;r;,j: ^. r : :, f^ ^i^^.'^'.^1 . ^.W^^te :^^ .y M % "^ '§ rSssSS-'SSs. g '!sss^ K •. V 9 '^ ^k ^ s/ v%^y '"':S3^?gSt-' 3. 4. 5. ^ Coiainittee of Uie society, lias been. approved by the Joint Registiar, Cooperative Societies, Raipur on 7.4.2005 and as such, it cannot be held that tae unpugnetl oitler faas beeii passed. Only approval was accorded by the letter (AruiexuTe P/13), addressed to fhe Chainnaa of tfae private society. 'l'he letter dated .7.4.2005 (Annexure P/13) is neither addressed nor endors.ed to the petitioner. By impleading ttie State Govenunent as a party, this petition cannot be brought within the frame work ot requireiiients ot Ai'ticle a26 of tlie Constitution of India. A writ/direction. can be issued only to tbe 'State', as conteniplated under Article 12 ot the Constitiition ot India. 'I'he petitioner has t'ailed to establish that the private society is a 'State', as enshruied in. Article 12 of the Coiistitution ot' India. There is no grievance or reUef against the State Goveruinent, as the approval of the rcsolution dated 28.2.2005, passed by the private society was accorded. The approval itseU' caunot be a subject miatter of challenge in this petition. In view of the foregoing, this petition is not inaintaiuable and is accorduiglv disinissed. Satish K. Agnihotri Judge TliakuT