IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH APRIL 2008 / 22ND CHAITHRA 1930 RP.No. 463 of 2008(S) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(CRL).57/2008 Dated 06/03/2008 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ---------------------------- JAYAPRAKASH, S/O.GOPALAN, AGED 39 YEARS, PARAIKKAL, KOLLAPPA, POST PATTANUR, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SMT.K.K.CHANDRALEKHA SRI.GOPAKUMAR G. (ALUVA) RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT: ------------------------ 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KANNUR. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MATTANNUR POLICE STATION, MATTANNUR, KANNUR. 3. MEPADAL LAKSHMANAN, S/O.THOTTATHIL BALAN, PARAIKKAL HOUSE, PERUVAMPARAMBU, POST PADIYUR, KANNUR. R1 & R2 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI C.M.KAMMAPPU R3 BY ADV. SRI P.NARAYANAN THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. ------------------------------- R.P.NO.463 OF 2008 IN W.P.(CRL) NO.57 OF 2008 -------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of April, 2008 O R D E R Raman, J. Petitioner in the writ petition is the review petitioner herein. He seeks for review of the judgment dated 6/3/2008. 2. The writ petition was filed alleging that the petitioner's sister is kept under the illegal custody of the 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent is the brother-in-law of the petitioner and husband of his another sister. Based on the statement made by the 3rd respondent that the alleged detenue is admitted in the Tapodyan Ashram, Thrissur by the father of the alleged detenue, the matter was closed. According to the review petitioner, he made enquiries with the Ashram and stated that he came to know from his father that his father has not admitted the alleged detenue in the Ashram nor the Ashram Authority has permitted to see his sister, if she is there. In the circumstances he seeks for review. 2. If the alleged detenue is not in the custody of the 3rd respondent, then as against the 3rd respondent, no further direction can -2- R.P.No.463/2008 be issued. It is stated by the 3rd respondent that if the alleged detenue by ame Prasanna Kumari, daughter of Gopalan, is admitted in the Tap dyan Ashram, Thrissur, the Ashram Authorities will enable the pet tioner to see her. In case the alleged detenue is not admitted in the sai Ashram, it is open to the Ashram Authorities to inform this Court of the same. Review Petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMAN, Judge. V.K.MOHANAN, Judge. kcv.