CRM-M-31872-2011 [ 1 ] ::::::: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31872-2011 Date of decision:21.12.2011 Jaswant Singh @ Babu Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr. Jagraj Singh Khiva, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. A.S.Rai, DAG, Punjab. Mr. L.S.Sidhu, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This is a petition for grant of pre-arrest bail in a case registered vide FIR No.101 dated 04.10.2011, under Sections 366, 376, 506, 342 of IPC at Police Station Talwandi Sabo, District Bathinda. The FIR is registered on the complaint of Sandeep Rani Sharma daughter of Leela Ram Sharma in which she had alleged that she is matric pass. On 30.08.2011, his neighbourer Jaswant Singh (petitioner herein) took her from her house on the pretext of performing marriage by saying that he is having huge wealth and would give her all comforts of life. She has also alleged that she was taken to a Kothi built in his fields where she was raped. It is also alleged in the FIR that the petitioner committed rape upon the complainant for many days but he did not perform marriage with her and on 02.10.2011, the complainant fled away from the said Kothi and narrated the entire story to her parents. Initially, her parents were reluctant to lodge the FIR out of fear but CRM-M-31872-2011 [ 2 ] ::::::: since the petitioner kept on committing rape with the complainant, therefore, the present FIR has been lodged. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a married man who has got 11 years' old son. He further submits that the petitioner has not committed the offence because the prosecutrix is a consenting party. During the course of hearing, the prosecutrix had appeared before this Court and had submitted that she is living with the petitioner. She has also filed an affidavit dated 19.12.2011 in this regard. Apparently, the petitioner is playing with the lives of two females; one with whom he is married and is having a son and other one is the present prosecutrix who is being sexually exploited without any relation. In my considered opinion, such person does not deserves the concession of anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby dismissed. December 21, 2011 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) vinod* JUDGE