THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.18011 OF 2011 ORDER: This Writ Petition has been instituted aggrieved by the alleged interference of respondents 1 and 2, at the instance of the third respondent, with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of land of an extent of Acs.12.58 cents situated in Survey Nos.218/4, 210 and 212 of Chettunnapadu Village, Bhimadolu Mandal, West Godavari District. The case of the petitioners is that they own land totally admeasuring Acs.12.58 cents situated in Survey Nos.218/4, 210 and 212 of Chettunnapadu Village. It is also their case that necessary title deeds and pattadar passbooks have been issued by the competent authority in their favour. It is their further case that they have approached the District Collector and the Chairman of the District Level Committee for Fresh Water Aqua Culture, West Godavari, Eluru, and obtained necessary permission for carrying on pisci culture for a period of five {5} years commencing on 29.01.2009 valid up to 28.01.2014. It is also their case that the third respondent herein, Smt.P.Vijayalakshmi, had instituted suit in O.S.No.527 of 1999 on the file of the District Court, West Godavari at Eluru, seeking a declaration that she is the absolute owner of the plaint schedule land of 0.50 cents and to the said suit, Sri Bala Venkateswara Rao and Smt. Bala Nagamani were impleaded as defendants 1 and 2 and that the aforementioned two individuals are the parents of the third petitioner herein and that the said suit has been dismissed on 29.08.2008. Thus, the third respondent, having failed to establish her title and right over the land in question, in a competent Civil Court, has approached the District Collector and at the instance of the District Collector, the revenue officials are interfering with their right, title and peaceful possession over the property in question. Hence, this Writ Petition is instituted. Learned Government Pleader has been instructed to inform this Court that respondents 1 and 2 have never made any attempts to interfere with the possession of the petitioners nor did they do anything, to come in the way of the petitioners herein, either possessing or enjoying the land in question. Because of a complaint lodged by the third respondent with the District Collector, facts are sought to be gathered as a general enquiry, which does not amount to interfering with the possession of the petitioners. In view of this statement made by the learned Government Pleader that respondents 1 and 2 are not interfering with the right, title and peaceful possession of the petitioners herein, this Writ Petition is unnecessary to be entertained by this Court. It is made abundantly clear that should there be any dispute between the petitioners on the one hand and the third respondent on the other, it is open for the parties to take recourse to law and secure adjudication of their disputes inter se, if any. But respondents 1 and 2 herein on their own shall not interfere with the petitioners’ or that of the third respondent’s right. With this, the Writ Petition stands disposed of at the admission stage. No costs. _________________________ (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 29th June 2011 RRB