53> HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPIJR Writ Pefition (S) No. 2714 of2008 PETITIONE!^ RESPONDENTS 1. Gopi Sao S/o Shri B.P. Sao aged about 33 years, Lecturer(Mathematics) Govt. Polytechnic Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (CG). 2. Suresh Kumar Patel S/o Shri Dasrath Patel, aged 37 years, Lectiirer (Physics) New Govi. Enginnering College, Raipur (CG). 3. Pankaj Shende S/o Shri S. Shende Aged about 33 years, Lecturer (Metallurgy) Govemment Polytechnic Durg (CG). 4. Smt Ismila Singhai W/o Shri Ashish Choudhary aged about 31 years, Lecturer (Electrical) New Govemment Engineering Raipur (CG). 5. Sudhir Kumar Pandey S/o Shri M.S. Pandey, Lecturer (Chemistry) Govemment Polytechnic Tafchatpur, Distt. Bilaspur (CG). 6. Smt. Sharda Tiwari W/o Shri Lokesh Tiwari, aged about 33 years, Lecturer (Electronics) Govt. Girls Polytechnic Raipur (CG). 7. Rekhraj Chandrakar S/o Late Shri Pawan Kumar Chandrakar, aged about 30 years, Lecturer (M.O.M.) Go^. Polytechnic Durg (CG). 8. Smt. Shimpi Sitholey W/o Shri Manish Sitholey, aged about 30 years, Lecturer (English) Govt. Polytechnic Durg (CG). 9. Smt. Vandana Bharti W/o Shri R.K. Bharti, aged about 28 years Lecturer (Chemistry) Govt. . Polytechnic Durg (CG). lO.Ku. Vandana Tirkey D/o Shri Rainu Ram, aged about 28 years, Lecturer (Chemistry) Govt. Polytechnic Durg (CG). 11 Abhijal ShuUa S/o Dr. Ashok Shukla aged about 34 years, Lecturer (English) Govt. Polytechnic Mahasamimd (CG). VER8US 1. State of Chhattisgaih Through : Secretary, Department of Technical Education, Mantralaya, DKS Bhawan, Raipur (CG). • 2. The Director, Technical Education, Chhattisgarii, Raipur(CG). 3.Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through its Secrctary, Pension Ba<^, Raipur(CG). (WRTT PETFriON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUT[ON OF INDIA) "^ ^ahu s^ (SB: HontbleMr.8atishK.Agmhotri,J.) Present : Shri Virendra Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORALORDER (Passed on 09th day ofMay, 2008) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition with libert^/ to make representatbn to the concemed authority. No objection fi-om other side. 2. It is ordered accordmgly. 3. Consequendy, the writ petition is dismissed as wthdrawn with tfae above stated liberty. No order asto costs. Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge