1 SNS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.192 OF 2010 WITH REVIEW PETITION STAMP NO.21790 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.148 OF 2004 Balasaheb D. Salokhe ...Applicant. v/s. The Youth Development Co-operative Bank Ltd. and Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Abhijeet A Desai i/by Makarand S. Narwekar ,advs. For the Applicant. Mr. Amit Borkar, adv. For the Respondent No.1. CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J. DATED : MARCH 11, 2011. P.C. 1 Against the order allowing the revision application, the present applicant had preferred Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court and that was rejected with liberty to file appropriate proceedings and, therefore, he has filed the present review application. 2 Heard. The original plaintiff, who is respondent no.1 in the revision application no.148 of 2004, has filed this application for condonation of delay of one year and 30 days in filing the review petition against the order passed by this Court dated 26th March, 2008. There is a long delay. However, assuming that delay was justified, I 2 have heard the learned counsel on the grounds for review. The learned counsel has taken me through paragraphs 7, 9, 14 and 15 of the original plaint to show that the revision applicant, who was original defendant no. 1, had played fraud and was in collusion with original defendant no.3. However, after careful perusal of the same, I find no substance in this contention. While allowing the revision petition, this Court had noted that all the allegations of fraud or fraudulent acts are directed against the original defendant no.3, who is brother of the present applicant . There is nothing in the plaint, which would go to show that the defendant no. 1/revision applicant had played any fraud. Therefore, I do not find any substance in the review application. 3 Therefore, while Criminal Application No.192 of 2010 for condonation of delay is allowed, Review Application Stamp No.21790 of 2009 stands dismissed. (J.H. BHATIA,J.)