THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.25186 of 2010 Date : 8-2-2011 Between : S.Munwar Basha s/o.M.Imam Saheb .. Petitioner And The Managing Director, A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC), Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri N.Aswartha Narayana Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Sri P.Roy Reddy Counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 9 : The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to set-aside proceedings Lr.No.178/ZO-ATP/IP- Gollapuram/SRKCIL/2009, dated 13-7-2010 of respondent No.2 whereby he has addressed a letter to respondent No.8 opining that the purchase of Ac.4-01 cents in Sy.No.11, (part) of Gollapuram village, Hindupur Mandal, Anantapur District by it, as illegal and that Smt.Nagaratnamma and the petitioner herein also have no right of transfer/purchase of the assigned land. It is the pleaded case of the petitioner that he has purchased the above mentioned land from respondent No.9 under registered sale deed dated 17-9-2009. The petitioner, in turn, sold the said land in favour of respondent No.8 under registered sale deed dated 31-10-2009. Thereafter, respondent No.2 had addressed the letter to respondent No.8. The petitioner asserted that respondent No.2 has neither power nor jurisdiction to address such a letter to respondent No.8. In my opinion, the petitioner having parted with title to respondent No.8 has no locus to question the letter addressed by respondent No.2 to respondent No.8. Even assuming that the petitioner felt aggrieved by the impugned proceedings, neither the rights of any of the parties have been adjudicated by the said proceedings nor an order adverse to the interests of the petitioner or respondent No.8 has been passed by any competent authority. The impugned proceedings, at best, would reflect the opinion of respondent No.2 and on the basis of such opinion, if any further action is taken, the affected party is always entitled to avail his remedy before the appropriate court and the impugned proceedings would not in any manner curtail such rights of the affected parties in availing such remedies. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.32188/2010 is disposed of as infructuous. __________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY.,J Date : 8-2-2011 AM