IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1556/2008 ( Ravi Pochalu Pasula .vs. State of Maharashtra) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR, J. DATE : 9 th JUNE, 2009 Heard Shri Haidari, Advocate, for the applicant and Shri Thakare, APP, for respondent State. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has been released on bail, in default of filing the charge-sheet within the stipulated time. The reply of the respondent shows that immediately after registration of FIR, investigating agency has recorded the statement of various witnesses and also collected payment vouchers & receipts and on perusal of the statement of witnesses and payment vouchers & receipts, there is strong prima facie case against the applicant. It is difficult to comprehend as to why the charge sheet has not been filed by the respondent despite such assertion in the reply, in time. Although this application is disposed of as infructuous, learned APP to seek instructions on the aforesaid query and make submissions within 15 days. The application be treated as disposed of. If the say is filed by the learned APP, list the matter on 23rd June, 2009. JUDGE Rvjalit