IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22514 of 2008 ISRARUL HAQUE @ ISHRARUL HAQUE @ PAPPU--petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR & Nagma Farhat—opp.parties ----------- 8. 05.01.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and for the complainant. The petitioner is the husband apprehending arrest in a complaint case under Section 498A and other provisions of the Penal Code including Sections ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted that the complainant in her solemn affirmation stated that she was not willing to go back to the matrimonial home. The petitioner filed a suit for restitution of conjugal rights leading to an ex parte decree when the complainant refused to appear despite notice and that the petitioner is not aware of any application having been filed to set aside the same, on which aspect counsel for the complainant is also unable to throw any light. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner, above named, surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, when he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rupees ten thousand with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Complaint case no. 2524 of 2007 (Trial No. 3007/08). Spal/ (Navin Sinha,J.)