^. HISH CWKT (V WHATOS6MS.H AT BILASPUR WA Petition (55 hto. 26W of 2007 Petitiaier Rumbai Suhu W/o Punurwn Sohu Age 59 yeors R/o Viliage Bijebhata Tehsi! &orgar^aon tfistt. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Throu9h: Secretary, Public Works Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur 2. Sub &ivisiond Officer Public Works Department (B/R) Sub Division No. 2 Doi^argaon Distt- Rajncndgaon (C.6.) WrJt eetition urider Arl-icle 226 of the Constilution of Indio Sir^ie Beneh; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. ^gnihotri. Present; Mr. Anoop Majumdar. Adwcate for- the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for State/respondents. ORbER (Passed on 3pd &ay of ttoy, 2007) 1. By this petition, iearned counsel appearing for the petitioner' submits thot the petitioner wvs employed as permanent ©ar^man in Pubtic tVopks Department, Sub Division No. 2, Dongargaon, District Rcynandgaan ond the petitioner, 'ho has worked for more than 25 years sss ©aigmQnseeks a relief thert tiie petitianer being permanent gangman be retired at the cge of 62 yeors in accordonce with the Chhattisgarii Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivorshiki- Ayu) Adhiniysm, 1967 (for shart the Aet, 1967 ) read with Fundamenta! Ruie (for short 'F.R.') 56. 2. Accordin9 to lecrned counsel for the petitioner, tiie petitioner ottained the status of permenent employ'ee. as defined under Rule 2(c) of the Chhattisgarh (Workcharged and Contingency Pdd Employees) Pension Ruies, 1979 (for short 'tha Ruies, 1979'), framed under Articie^®^fl£-d"" 'r, Constitution of India. After hsving attoined the status of the psrmanent emptoy'ee the petitioner would retire on attainting the oge of 62 year-s on superainuation uider the provisions of the Act, 1967. 3. Learned counsel appeoring for the petitioner wouid submit that the case of the petitioner is squareiy cover-ed by the decision of this Court passed on 4 Janu<ry, 2007 in WP. No. 454/2SX)5 (Raii Prasad Yadw and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh a others) and other connected mctters. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State does not dispute the submissions made by leorned counsel for the petitioner. 5. nceordingiy, the petitioner, who is permsment gangman, is entitied to retire on attaining the age of 62 yeors in accordance with the Act, 1967. The petition is accordingiy allowed. order cs to costs. Sd/- Satish K.Agnihoa1 Judge ^- u