1 1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA NO.3659/09 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.5331/2009. (The State of Mah. and Anr. Vs.Dada Borade and Ors.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders. or directions and Registrar’s orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 21 st January, 2010. ... 1) Heard Mr.DV Tele, learned AGP for State. 2) There is delay of 324 days in causing to file the appeal. 3) The delay though is confined to 314 days, it is no so. The order of the learned Reference Court is dated 4th January, 2008. Copy application was made in time, official hassles allegedly added to the misery. Incidentally, with the assistance of learned AGP, I have gone through the order of the learned Reference Court dated 4.1.2008. 4 Hectares 49 R. of the land from Gut No. 364 situate at village Dudhad,Tq. and District Aurangabad, came to be acquired. The sale instance, which was flashed before the Reference Court was six months prior to Notification. I do not see any error committed by the learned Reference Court in relying on such sale instance and reaching at the 2 conclusion of enhancing the compensation. On both the counts, the appeal lacks merits. Delay being not explained properly, the application for condonation of delay rejected. Consequently, the appeal dismissed. Necessary court fees be refunded as per the Rules. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/ca3659.09