IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 582 of 2003 Shri Mahadeo Krishna Patil and Anr. ...Appellants V/s Shri Ganapati Sansthan,Sangli ..Respondent Shri S.G.Page for Appellants CORAM:S.R.SATHE,J. DATED:22nd June 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C.:- . Heard the learned Advocate for the Appellants. 2. Plaintiffs’ suit for declaration was dismissed by the trial court and the said order has been confirmed by the first appellate Court. 3. The only point raised in this appeal is whether the plaintiff has proved his case that he has occupied the suit plot as a tenant. The first Appellate Court has dealt with this point extensively and has reached to the conclusion that the plaintiff has failed to prove his case that he is in occupation of the suit plot as a tenant. There is nothing on record to show that the said finding of fact is perverse or is against the evidence on record. 4. Under the circumstances there is no substantial question of law involved in the matter. 5. The appeal is dismissed in limine. ( S.R.SATHE,J.)