1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18957 of 2011 1. Nibha Devi @ Neva Devi Wife of Sunil Basedar @ Khokha Basedar. 2. Neha Devi Wife of Sanjeev Kumar @ Bobby Basedar Both R/o Village- Tintolia, P.S. Partapganj, District-Supaul --Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar --Opp.Party With Criminal Miscellaneous No.19744 of 2011 1. Sunil Kumar Basedar @ Khokha Basedar S/o Saryug Basedar. 2. Sanjeev Kumar @ Bobby Basedar, S/o Sunil Kumar Basedar. 3. Rajeev Kumar @ Guddu Basedar, S/o Sunil Kumar Basedar, All R/o Village-Tintolia, P.S. Pratapganj, District-Supaul. --Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar --Opp.Party 3 14.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon copy of the case diary containing 96 paragraphs. 2 Since both these applications arise out of one case they are being heard together and are being disposed of this composite order. All the five petitioners are named accused in this case of abduction of sister and niece (sister’s daughter) of informant who are none else than step mother and sister of petitioner no.1, Sunil Kumar Basedar @ Khokha Basedar (of Cr.Misc. no. 19744 of 2011). Submission is that except suspicion due to petitioners being related with the two ladies there is absolutely nothing asserted in the first information report and also nothing emerged in investigation till date though investigation is still pending but the two females are still traceless. Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioners, till conclusion of investigation / submission of charge sheet, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 3 satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in Forbesganj P.S. Case no. 254 of 2010, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioners (of Cr.Misc. no. 19744 of 2011) shall remain present before the court below on each and every date till conclusion of investigation / submission of charge sheet, whichever is earlier. If the petitioners fail to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be canceled. AAhmad ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)