IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 212 of 2010. Decided on: 18.3.2010. Tek Chand ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P & Anr. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. For the petitioner : Mr. Avinash Jaryal, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K.Sharma, Sr. Addl. AG. for respondents No. 1 to 4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by his transfer. Though several contentions are taken in the writ petition, two main submissions are:- 1. That the petitioner is to retire from service in February, 2011. 2. Compared to the petitioner, the fifth respondent has far longer stay in Chamba. The petitioner may file a representation before the first respondent within one week from today. The first respondent shall examine the facts of the case and in case the submission that the fifth respondent has continued for far more period than the petitioner in Chamba, taking note of the fact that he has to retire in less than one year, the first respondent shall consider whether the petitioner can be accommodated at Chamba till his retirement. Orders, in this regard shall be passed within another one week. -2- The writ petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending application, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 18, 2010 ( Justice R.B.Misra ), (ks) Judge.