IU '-• ^s^ ^ Jaydeo Nag, aged about 52 years, Shala, Upet, Biock fieedam, Distt. South Baster Dantewada (C.6.) l.-- ..•• ^y ^§^y y^M^y (^ The pefitioner named above most respectfully begs to submit t*l ^' liw .(S)No. 6395 of 2011 Jaydeo Nac VERSUS ^] State ofChhattisgarh and others Shri Rahu! Mishra, eounsel forthe petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. A.G. forthe State. Priya (21.10.2011) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his case is covered wrth the case of Asha Saxena Vs. State of M.P. & Ors. 2009 (!ii) MPJR (SC) 59 for grant of two advance increments as the petitioner has done D.Ed. He submits that he may be permltted to withdraw this petltion vvlth liberty to make representation and in turn djrection may be issued to the respondents to conslder the case of the petitioner in accordance with !aw. 2. Learned counsel for the State points out that so far as the Tribal Department is concerned till date no such circular has been issued and therefore the petitioner Is not entitled for the benefit of two advance increments as per the decision ofthe supreme Court in the case of A.sha Saxena (supra). 3. Be that as it may, in the. eventuality of making any such representation by the petitioner, it is expected that thesame would be decided as expeditiousiv as oossible in accordance with law. 4. , It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any oplnion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned wouid ,be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in j' accordance with iaw.- yNI5^^ jrti^.-iiaig,,;;.,,^