1 CAW 2927 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2927 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4936 OF 1994 Chintamani Gajanan Velkar ...Petitioner Vs. Gajanan Haribhau Kurhade & Ors. ...Respondents And M/s.Seven Star Developers ...Applicants ----- Mr.A.R.Shaikh i/b.Mr.S.D. Mishra for Petitioner ----- CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED: 26th April, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant. None appears on behalf of the Respondents, though they were served. 2. The learned counsel for the Applicant submits that he has purchased the suit premises and, therefore he is necessary party and may be added as the Petitioner. The learned counsel for the Applicant submits that he has tendered the copy of the application to the Petitioners but not reply has received from them. 2 CAW 2927 of 2010 3. In my view, the averments made in the civil application are not controverted. Hence, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of. Amendment to be carried out within two weeks. (V.M. KANADE J.)