FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4829 OF 2010 [The State of Maharashtra vs Prakash Ramdas Dabhade and ors.] _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________ Smt. Y.M.Kshirsagar, A.P.P. for the applicant/State Shri V.M.Kagne, advocate for respondents ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 6 th April, 2011. PER COURT :­ 1 Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant/State seeking leave to file appeal, challenging the judgment and order of acquittal, dated 30.6.2010, thereby acquitting respondent nos. 1 to 4 i.e. original accused nos. 1 to 4 for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 306, 323, 504 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3 I have perused the impugned judgment and record and proceedings, as well as heard the learned counsel for the parties, and I am of the view that this is a fit case to grant leave to file appeal in respect of respondent nos. 1 and 3 i.e. original accused nos. 1and 3. However, leave to file appeal against respondent nos. 2 and 4 i.e. original accused nos.2 and 4 stands refused, considering the allegations against them and their respective roles in the alleged offences. (2) 4 Admit the appeal against respondent nos. 1 and 3 i.e. original accused nos. 1 and 3. Mr. V.M.Kagne, learned counsel waives service of notice for respondent nos. 1 and 3 after admission. 5 Respondent nos. 1 and 3 to furnish same bail, on which they were released on bail during the trial, but on execution of fresh bonds, before the Trial Court, within the period of six weeks. 6 R. and P. be sent back to the concerned court. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) dbm/crap4829.10