AB 152/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.K.MUSAHARY Heard Mr. A.J. Atia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Addl. P.P. Assam. The C.D. as called for has been produced. I have perused the same. On perusal of the same it is found that there is a family dispute between the ac cused petitioner and the informant. They are brothers- in- law in relation. From the C.D. no such materials are found due to which the application for anticipat ory bail could be rejected. In view of the above, it is directed that in the event of arrest in connection w ith Murajhar P.S. Case No. 208/10 u/s. 448/325/427/379 IPC the accused petition er namely Md. Samsul Hoque shall be enlarged on bail of Rs. 15,000/- with one lo cal surety of the like amount subject to satisfaction of the Arresting Authority on condition that he shall appear before the I.O. within 10 days from today and co-operate with the Investigating Agency as and when required. The bail application stands disposed of.