^ XI-HC-22 'SSf ^ltiilcl*), Bflljy'i^. !cl<1i'M*i< 13 u>^Ns.6}-79^&r' *<i^iCTi shtirai .a;-' <*wM^-im^? •? ftret <r<^i< i? 3if5(TiT3n^r ^y.^^ ^ Shri Raiesh.Pandey, couhsel for tt Shri Sandeep Dubey, Govt; Ady. Heard; - . • ^ Counsel for the petitioner subitut per Annexiu-e P-1 dated 16-11-2005 du| present he inay be gn;en an opportuj respoadents. 'Havwa coiisidered and without case, ifl fhe opnrion oftiris Court,end8 4 to the petitioner to make a detailed re^ eompetent authorit^' of respondents alotfj wittrin 15 davs irom today and on su(|l authority of.respondents shall decide th^ petltioner. ^ ^ Ifor the State, on advanee copy. that the petitioner has been transferred as mg tfte ban petiod. He subtriits tiiat for the lity to make a representation before the xpressing any- opinion on fhe ments of the 'justice wifl be served if a direction is given isentation raismg lus grievances before the with a copy of the petition and this ordCT. representation beiag filed, the competent . same on its own meuts: in accordance with: lawas^iyaspossible.preferabh'.witiii^twomonths&omthe.dateof^ representaUon/Itismade'clearttottf.a4y^eyanceTeniam^fhepetitiQnCT^^ the remedy available under the law. Withfheaforesaidbbseryatioas, CQBseqMenfly M.W.P.No. 4903/ ^,--'- .'•• . .. . . • :" • Certffiedcopyasperrules. »- his p.etitionstan(te disposed of. >005!statids cUsposed af. , Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [17^:^fV^