IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12552 of 2006 SHITAL PRASAD, SON OF LATE RITLAL DAS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DOCTOR TOLI, MOKAMA, P.O. AND P.S.- MOKAMA, DISTRICT – PATNA. …… PETITIONER Versus 1. THE REGIONAL P.F.COMMISSIONER (PENSION), BIHAR, PATNA, R. BLOCK, ROAD NO. 6, DISTRICT – PATNA. 2. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (PENSION), PATNA. ………. RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 20/04/2011 Heard. Sri Mahendra Prasad Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner in presence of Sri Surya Vansh Rai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 & 2/Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), Bihar, Patna & Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), Patna respectively, submits that the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to file representation before the competent authority in view of statement made in paragraph no. 14 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondents. The submission made on behalf of the petitioner has not been refuted by Sri Surya Vansh Rai, learned counsel for Respondent No. 1 and 2. In view of stand taken by the parties, there is 2 no need to further keep the matter pending. The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file representation before the competent authority. Praful (Rakesh Kumar, J.)