1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :06.04.2011 CORAM: THE HONOUABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN Writ Petition (MD).No.4040 of 2011 K.Petchimuthu . . Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9. 2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirunelveli Range, Tirunelveli. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. . . Respondents Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to give up-gradation to the petitioner to the post of Special Sub Inspectors of Police on the date of his respective completion of 25 years of service along with eligible arrears of pay and allowances from time to time to avoid disparity strictly in compliance with the G.O.(Ms) No.15 Home (Police-V) Department, dated 07.01.2010. For Petitioner : M/s.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondents: Mr.N.Ilango Government Advocate ORDER Mr.N.Ilango, learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2. I have heard Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.N.Ilango, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 3. The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition for a Mandamus directing the respondents to give up-gradation to him to the post of Special Sub Inspectors of Police on the date of his respective completion of 25 years of service along with eligible arrears of pay and allowances from time to time to avoid disparity strictly in compliance with the G.O.(Ms) No.15 Home (Police-V) Department, dated 07.01.2010. 4. The petitioner, seeking such relief has sent representation dated 20.11.2010. However, the said representation was not considered so far and hence, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petitioner for the relief stated earlier. 5. Considering the limited scope of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the claim made by the petitioner, I direct the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 20.11.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P&A) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9. 2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirunelveli Range, Tirunelveli. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. Jikr ssk/21.04.2011 /5c -2p/- Order made in Writ Petition (MD).No.4040 of 2011 06.04.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/