IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. M. No.11966-M of 2010 Date of Decision:27.4.2010 Preeti Virdi .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .... Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Ms. Poonam Tara, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. The present petition has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondents No.2 and 3 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar vide order dated 12.4.2010 (Annexure P-1) in FIR No.52 dated 5.3.2010 under Sections 498-A and 406 of the IPC at Police Station B Division District Amritsar. The only ground raised by learned counsel for the petitioner for cancellation of anticipatory bail is that the dowry articles have not been recovered from respondents No.2 and 3. However, the same is not a ground for cancellation of bail. Moreover, the respondents had joined the investigation. They are the old parents of the main accused. He does not reside with them and lives abroad. He has not filed any application for bail. Whether the articles are with the petitioner or with the respondents is matter of evidence. Dismissed. 27.4.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE