WP 3573/11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3573/2011 M/s Indukesh Travels Dhule through Proprietor V/s The Union of India & others. _______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Shri N.R. Thorat, Advocate for petitioner. Shri N.S. Choudhary, Advocate for respondent no.1. Shri Alok Sharma, Standing Counsel for respondent nos.2 to 4. CORAM: P.B. MAJMUDAR & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. Date: 06.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. The grievance of the petitioner is that its contract has been illegally terminated and now it is decided to give tender to some one else by inviting fresh advertisement. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is arbitration clause in the agreement. In our view, since the contract of the petitioner is already terminated, the prayer WP 3573/11 2 made by the petitioner to restore the tender in its favour cannot be granted by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. If the petitioner has any legal remedy under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, it is open for the petitioner to invoke the provisions under the said Act. With the above observations, the petition is rejected. (S.S. Shinde, J.) (P.B. Majmudar, J.) Dt/- 06.05.2011 ndk/c65112