IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3920 of 2010 PROF(DR.)HARI PRASAD MAHTO S/O LATE BASU MAHTO R/O VILL.- RASULPUR, P.O.- BAHA CHOUKI, P.S.- MAIDNI CHAUKI, DISTT.- LAKHISARAI ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, DEPTT. OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2. THE COMMISSIONER CUM-SECRETARY, DEPTT. OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR, DEPTT. OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 4.TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR. 5. THE VICE CHANCELLOR,TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 6. THE REGISTRAR, TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 7. THE FINANCE OFFICER,TILKA MANJHI BHAGALPUR UNIVERSITY, BHAGALPUR. 8. THE PRINCIPAL, R.D. & D.J. COLLEGE, MUNGER. ---Respondents ----------- 3. 9.4.2010 This case has come under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted that in the second last paragraph of the order dated 8.3.2010 the direction to pay the admitted dues has been mentioned, however, the words “with interest permissible under the rules” have been left out to be mentioned. Accordingly, after the words “if any,” the words “with interest permissible under the rules” be added so as to read the sentence that “the admitted dues, if any, with interest permissible under the rules could also be paid without further delay.” The order dated 8.3.2010 is modified to the above extent. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)