IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6473 of 2005 BETWEEN Gavara Pardasaradhi. ... PETITIONER AND Paka Venkata Satyanarayana. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner : MR. T. SHARATH Counsel for the Respondent: --NONE APPEARED-- The Court made the following: ORDER: Against the order of the executing Court ordering sale of shops as per the sale proclamation, this revision was preferred. 2. On 13.12.2005, while admitting the revision petition, this Court granted interim stay subject to condition of the deposit of half of the EP amount with a default clause. The said order was not complied with and therefore, this Court by further order dated 17.03.2006 permitted the executing Court to proceed with the sale of one of the three shops and only proceed to sell the other shops, if sale proceeds of one shop are not sufficient to satisfy the decree. 3. On 01.07.2010, when the revision petition came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner reported that he is not any more appearing and the petitioner has taken away the papers. This Court, therefore, directed notice to be sent to the petitioner through the Registry to make alternative arrangement or to appear. The said notice sent by this Court to the revision petitioner has returned unclaimed, which shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the revision petition. Today also nobody appears for the petitioner. Hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J June 9, 2011 DSK