IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-11491 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 4, 2010 Rajwanti .....Petitioner v. State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Surender Deswal, Advocate for the petitioner. ...... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for directing the respondents to initiate and decide the pending application dated 1.4.2010, Annexure P2, of the petitioner for pre-mature release. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be satisfied if respondent no.3, i.e., Superintendent of Jail, District Jail, Gurgaon, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 1.4.2010, Annexure P2, already made to him by the petitioner, in this regard, expeditiously. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.3, i.e.,Superintendent of Jail, District Jail, Gurgaon, to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on application, dated 1.4.2010, Annexure P2, already stated to have been moved to him by the petitioner, in this regard, expeditiously. 4.5.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge