IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 9969 of 2011 Date of Decision: 14.10.2011 Anil Kumar and others ........Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners 1. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? M.M. Kumar, J. The Notification dated 25.10.2010 is the subject matter of challenge in the instant petition at the instance of transporter complaining that the Eicher Canter, owned by them, which have been operating can not be subjected to any speed governor as envisaged by the impugned notification. A perusal of the notification reveals that it is confined to all Stage Carriages operating within the limits of Municipal Corporations and all Educational Institution buses and buses which are chartered with such institutions to ferry students to the institutions. Naturally the speed governors have to be installed in buses operating within the limits of Municipal Corporation or to ferry students. The aforesaid notification has no application to the Eicher Canter which are apparently operating inter city or even inter-State. The petition is wholly frivolous and misuse of process of law. Dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) 14.10.2011 JUDGE reena