Tumane ^ HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) N0.11 37/2005 PETITIONER Ramkrishan Versus RESPONDENTS State of Madhya Pradeshandomers SinnleBench: Hon'bleShri Satish K. Aanihotri, J. Present: - None for the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 12th day ofNovember, 2009) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf ofthe petitioner. The petitionermay not be interested in the matter. (2) In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosNsution. Registry is directed to send a copyof this order to the petitioner forthwith. 1 Sd/- .. ,„ SatisbK.^"tn Judge m'Si'H;u.a .riiiuA^sEEala;vassssa ^^^iSM^SsS^^&s^^^^^S^^^