IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 272 OF 2006 SHRI KUSHTA BHIKU VAINGANKAR AND 4 ORS., ... Applicants Versus STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR., ... Respondents Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. S. Bandodkar, Addl. Government Advocate for Respondent no.1. Mr. H. D. Naik, Advocate for the Respondent no.2. Coram:- A. S. OKA & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 9th June, 2010 P.C Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicants, who are the Petitioners in the Writ Petition, and learned Addl. Government Advocate for the Respondent no.1. 2. The prayer in this application is for grant of stay of selection process pursuant to the advertisement dated 11.12.2009 published in a daily newspaper. Looking to the controversy involved in the Writ Petition which has been admitted for final hearing, such a drastic interim relief cannot be granted. It is obvious that the entire process of selection on the basis of the said advertisement will be naturally subject to the final outcome of the main Writ Petition. 3. Subject to what is observed above, Civil Application is rejected. A. S. OKA, J. F. M. REIS, J. arp/*