1 RPV1.11 Bsb IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 1 OF 2011 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 188 OF 2009 Shakti Basawannapa Maynal ... Petitioner v/s Smita Shakti Maynal ... Respondent Mrs.Lalita Panchakshari for the petitioner. Respondent present in person. CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: 7TH OCTOBER, 2011 (In Chamber) P.C.: 1. The review petition has been filed contending that service was not effected in miscellaneous civil application prior to the order dated 26.2.2010 being passed. The review petition has been filed on 12.1.2011. There does not appear to be any application for condoning the delay in filing the review petition. Therefore, the review petition will have to be dismissed. 2. Apart from this, my order dated 26.2.2010 clearly 2 RPV1.11 indicates as to how the service was sought to be effected on the review petitioner. 2. In these circumstances, the review petition stands dismissed. (SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) 3 RPV1.11