1 16 wp.3041.10 ndm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3041 OF 2010 Prabhunarayan Parasnath Pandey and anr. ... Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. ... Respondents ----- Mr. P.P.Runwal for the Petitioners. Mr. J.P.Yagnik, APP for the State. ----- CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR and P.D. KODE, JJ. DATE : 26 th October, 2010. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned APP. 2 Perused the FIR and the accompanying documents with the writ petition in particular Injury Certificate. We are not impressed by the arguments of the Petitioner that the FIR has been manipulated by Respondent No.3. The Injury Certificate no doubt described the injury as simple, but looking at the description of nature of injury, it is more than clear that the injury is more than simple injury. As a matter of fact, the medical report now available with the Investigating Authority does indicate that the injury sustained by the complainant was grievous injury including fracture of right last finger. The argument of the Petitioner that 2 16 wp.3041.10 the complaint has been registered out of vengeance on account of pending civil dispute between the parties also does not commend to us. The allegations in the complaint is supported by the injury certificate which is already on record and also now available with the Investigating Officer indicating that the injury suffered by the complainant is grievous injury. 3 Taking any view of the matter, it is not a case for quashing of FIR. Hence rejected. Needles to observe that this decision will not influence the trial Court in deciding the matter in issue before the trial Court on its own merits in accordance with law. [ P.D. KODE, J ] [ A.M. KHANWILKAR, J ]