C-^-' ^<-5^/___ 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cl N0. <S3^f OF 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ...• ,^ t- >-0 y-^^.- ..f^S^ ^^y" ^yy <2<^ ,\y ^' Nasir Qureshi, S/o Mohd. Siddique Qureshi, aged about 49 years, R/o Nawab Mohalla, Ward no. 17, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Urban Administration and Developraent Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh). 2. The Collector, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 3. The Nazul Officer, Kawardha, District Kabirdham C.G. 4. The Municipal Council, ./^>-~~«<../r'% Kawardha, Through: the Chief Municipal Officer, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) t t PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OFINDIA FOR ISSUE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THB LIKE NATURE ETC. :!11i iitHi'*"""''***"*!' -•:-:.-;;,_.:..-.-.- _'.::__:^' ::'i^'^ ^f /^f '^..-fA >' 1< Versus •.lasirQureshi State of Chhattisgarh & Others WRST PETiTION UNDER ARTiCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF iNDIA ihotri. J.) Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate.forthe petitioner. Shri N.M.Roy, Panel Lawyer forthe State/ respondents No.1 to 3. Shri A.S.Kachhawaha, Advocate forthe resoondent No.4. ^.^Gi- (Passed on 27th day of September, 2010) Shri N.N.Roy, learned counsel appearing for the State/ rsspondents No.1 to 3 submits that the petitioner has already been paid compensation and the petitioner would be allotted a plot as a measure of rehabiiltatlon wherever other simiiariy situated shop owners wouid be CQnsidered for rehabliitation. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submlts that no compensation has been paid to the petitioner. If the compensation has not been paid, the same shall be paid to the petitioner, in accordance with law. Since the Municipal Corporation has already decided to allot shop to the petitioner in the area wherever other simjiarly situated shop owners have been rehabilitated, nothing survives In this matter. The petitioner may apply for grant of compensation and allotment of shop, if so advlsed. !n view ofthe forefloina, this petition stands disposed of. No orders asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ~9