IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.4571/2011 Date of decision: 29.07.2011. Kiran Rani ....................Petitioner v. Union Bank of India and another .....................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jaswant Singh Present: Mr.SK Jain,Advocate for the petitioner. Jaswant Singh.J.(Oral) Plaintiff/petitioner has filed the instant revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution for setting aside the order dated 10.6.2009 (P1) and the appellate order dated 27.4.2011 (P2) passed in the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC filed by the petitioner/ plaintiff whereby no injunction qua the interim recovery of the amount of pension allegedly wrongly fixed has been granted. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff very fairly states that he would be satisfied if the time period granted by the learned appellate court in the order dated 27.4.2011 directing the learned trial court to conclude the trial is further re-inforced, as the same would finally settle the issue. The prayer made by the learned counsel is fair and acceptable. Accordingly the present revision petition is disposed of as infructuous with the directions to the trial court to dispose of the matter as directed by the learned appellate court. It is further directed that the parties to the litigation shall co-operate in meeting the targeted date. 29.07.2011 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge