^'Si y~ ^ ^ '^ 3? .'f cf-\ PAGE No ^ Dt THB BBGH COURT OF JWDICATORBATBqASWm wsatfErrswsivo.: 5/<c^ /aooe PETmOMBR , ;< ^^- .^y^ ^&f/ {.,:•; \"..- .-^^ ^y^ <^-' K^' .-'": < '^' ^' ^o^ o' ^ Smt. Salra Ruby Hanifiw W/o Mohd. Aslam Hanifee, Aged aiwut 40 Yeara, By Occupation, Lecturer. Govemment Girls Hr. Sec. School, Sarkanda Distt Bilaspur. (C.G.) -:TOBEISCS;- / 1. State OfChhattte®»»'h,through Secretary, Departmeat of School Education, Mantralaya O.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur.SC.G.^ /'2. Dtrecto»>ofSebw»I8<h»cation D.K. S Bhawaa, Raipur. fC.Q.} 3. Dtetriot ^ucation Ofilcer District Bil^pur {C.G.} '/• 4. Prtnelpal, Govt. Girls Hr. Sec. School Sarkanda, District Bilaspur {C.G.j iraar reTmoir mmpttR ARTICUB SKJS /227 OFT® coa'iswnmoK OF INDIA FOR Tae tssvsscs ov TBOB aSftlBtmoSlS). OR OKMBR (Sj. HI&H COURT OF CHHATTIS©ARHAT BILASPUR W. P_No. 3161 of 2006 » Petitioner : Smt. Saira Ruby Honifee Versus tespondents ; State of Chhattisgarh & others W. P. No. 3162 of 2006 Petitioner : Swt. Sayatri Tiwar Versus iespondents : State of Chhattisgi Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotrt. Shri Prakash Tiwar-i, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri V.V.S. Moorthy, Dy. Advocate Seneral with Smt. Anju &y. (Sovt. Adwcate for the respondents/State. ORDER ith 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that while working as Lecturers, the petitioners have gone on training to improve their qualifications on their own expenses and acquired i.Ed./B.TJ Examination Certificate. 2. The present writ petitions, being W.P. Nos. 3161/2006 and 3162/2006 involve simitar facts and common question of law. Thus, these petitions are being disposed of by this cornmon 3. According to learned counse! for the petitioners, the petitioners are entitled to two advaice iricrements in view of the decision of this Court- in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal .^:\ Corporation, Ourg ond another {2006 (11) MPJR-C6 96}. This Court in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipal Corporation, Durg and another (Supra), came to the conclusion that the teachers, who hnd obtained B. Ed./B.TJ. Examination Certificate on his own expenses, are covsred by the circuSar dated 24.12.98 issued by the State Soyernment of Madhya Pradesh. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submsts l4iat the facts and question of law involved in the present cases are • squareiy covered by decision of -fhis Court in the csse of Yashwant faimar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, Durg and ra), to which learned counset oppearing for respondents fairly concedes and a9"ees with the averment made by Searned counse! appearing for the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the writ petitions are ailowed in terms of the order pdssed in the case of Yashwant Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. Municipa! Corporation, burg ond cnother (Supra), subject to verificstion of 6. A copy of this order 1+is fact as to whether the petitioners have acquir-ed B. Ed./B.T.!. Examination Ceri'ificates on "rfieir own expenses or not. No order on record of one connected writ Sd/- Satish K.Agnihotri Judge