HI6H COURT OF ®HHATTI56ARHAf BILA5PUR DIVISION BENCH co^^^^^^^^ ^ HON'BLBSHRI N:LIRRA05AHEffE)ESI-lML)KH.J. llflltll 8?ill ;iii 'l!) :r-:.':[;. :<t.-s;. SMi'f' IIBIi lillilill ii!if>!:i:!1 ;Ww iiliiltffii- IINlill :^.j':::l;l^'l!l'i:' •^ SQ ^i;f •,'ww- }: ]SKK ^^l^,;l;E;li.: ;li:.!l iFi!; APPELLANT5: Applicdnts RE5PONBENTS ,Non-<ipRljeanfs. M.A.fQNo. 710 Of 2007 1. Smt. Sdraswatt yadav W/o Late Shri .: . 'ManhaFanYadavqged abouf34years. ; 2.1 ,6ovihdrgmYodav'S/ol-afe:5Hri Mdnhcfrdh • •'yadav, oged about .19 years. '• ,,1 ':• ^,:.;^ .i1.;',.;'."^ /;:':\'::':'3^'|il'^en3Fa^KnmaF''uy(Kl^:^^3j- ^.K;;L:.^^gi%anffijr'sy^av,'aged;abouf^ |:4.^::^ntaram^yayav^^Late.SHrklAftanhairaj]?j^;y yadav,agedaboyt;15<years.l,;':^'::,^,'::j::,-:^:^^^ '5. ^Santt^ ^adav.S/O l^e Shri Atehhardn^..^^ yaiSw.aQeS !at3oul";13 yeaps.:^;,'^. ;:.! •\' 4.:.,'-. ^,j ^ 6. • 1-firdlal yaddv S/b Late^ :SBrl: ^anhtiran. ^- '; :^'':; yadav,:aged .aboutl0:yedrs.';:.'^'•::,•iJ'-.K^^^^ 7., ;'Smt.;l^mkunwar yadav^W/gJ.Ldte.Sht'i^'s^i' ,^mgingh,agedaboyf:62yeare.\ . ,:?' h •2.' .3. lants No. 3 -tio6 Mihor.'Thretghl':^ Mother; Natyral Suardian ] : . . | ; [All (•/ovi|liige-Silodq,(Khapapi)Tahs!il& ^;&istt.&ui^,'£.6.]',.'' ::^. ^'. ••'••.'.^ :VEteUS.': l.'''.'<:.11' :•.••'... ...:;:^ 3'dirain S/o'Premldl Kunwar^R/6 Saridhi ,;.Naggr^Bljilai^j&istT.&ui^'£C^)-,:^''.; iver' 6f ' vefiijsle' - Tdnkep. No.', C& :07/ZC/1.©^;:.^: .;.: •:': ;,;;,SS;.Y ..;•:•':; ^SlJ^t^^6ui^ta;,,R/o,··i^^^^:^een;jiE>^^u ;Wdn(iir',^mp-2, tQsit&6is'j-t;6ur'g,C;©j New India Ingurdnce Co. 'E^tc!.. Braneh; C^fice^swei' f-hmse ^itaf.'V'i^.&.QBfif.^ Ourg.t^&Inauperb'fiqf^endjhgvebicle;.!,, ApBeal underSectionlTS^bf'thettotoi'VeKict^'Acl'.-iSSa.^...?, 'presenf:,C.§hr^ .^dshan^S^ .appdN'^;:E:^^,II^;,;y.l:1:^lii.t^ ;:^::'^ SvWS WM » ;"( ORALOROER (Passed on 02'' July. 2007) The following oral order of the Court. was passed by Dilip Raosaheb Oeshmukh. J. Heapd. The only ground urged by learned counsel for The appellants in this appeal for enhancement of compensatioh in case of accldental death of ttanharan Yadav.aged 40 years is That leorned Tribunal erred in assessing loss of dependency at Rs.3.000/- per month and the learned Tribunal ought to have taken into consideration That the deceased wag not only engaged in agrlcultural work, but also running a dairy business. No other point was urged. We have heard learned counsel for the appellants and also perused the impugned award. Learned Tribunal has taken into consideraTion that Tbe income of -fhe deceased from dairy business and also from agricultural »ror'k hadi continued unabated ond at the most the claimants were required to engagea person as labouper in place of the deceased; On this basis, the Trjbunal assesged loss of dependency at Rs.3,000/- per mont.h. We do not findany error in the approach of the learned Tribunal. Learned Tribunal has awarded compensation as foltows:- (i5 Loss of dependency Rs.3,84,000/- (ii) Lossof consortium . Rs.5,000/- (iil) Loveandaffectiontothewifeand children Rs.25,000/- (iv) Loss of affectiontotheniaTher Rs.S.OOO/- Lossofestate / . Rs.2,500/- (v) (vi) Funeralexpenses Total Rs.2,000/- Rs.4,23,500/- The learned Tr-ibunal has awarded a sum of Rg.4,23,500/-,and the above'compensatipn is, in our considered opinion, in the facts anti -s- circumstances of the ease, jugt and reasonable compensation.and calls for no Interference in this appeal. Theappeal being devbid of merit is dismissed at the stage of admission itself. ~1 Sd/- Acting Chief Justice Subbu Sd/- DUip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge