IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GOPAL REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 15326 of 2004 Between: 1 E.Rama Murthy, S/o Late Papaiah, R/o Warangal 2 E.Naga Raju, S/o Late Papaiah, R/o Warangal 3 E.Mahender, S/o Late Papaiah, R/o Warangal ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Special Officer & Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceilings, Warangal, Warangal District 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. ....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ, Order or direction, directing the Respondents-2 and 3 not to dispossess or take possession of excess land to an extent of 11057 Sq. Mts, in Sy.Nos.415, 416, 857, 858, 859, 860, 864, 865 and 843 situated at Waddepalli Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District, pending disposal of the Revision Petition before the 1st respondent No.118-RP/M (Rev.)/2004. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.R.NARASIMHA REDDY, Advocate Counsel for the Respondents 1&3: Govt. Pleader for REVENUE Counsel for Respondent No.2: ____ The Court at the stage of admission made the following: Oral Order: Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as respondents submit that against the order passed by the competent authority, determining the excess vacant land held by the petitioner, petitioner filed revision before the 1st respondent claiming benefits under G.O.Ms.No.733 Revenue (UC.II) Department dated 31-10-1986. Though the revision was admitted, the 1st respondent has not stayed the further proceedings pursuant to finalization of the declaration. In view of the same, there shall be stay of all further proceedings pursuant to determination of the excess vacant land and status quo with regard to possession of the land shall be maintained till the revision is disposed of by the 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent shall dispose of the revision said to have been filed by the petitioner as early as possible, after due notice to the parties. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. _________________ A.GOPAL REDDY, J. 27-08-2004 Murthy ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Special Officer & Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceilings, Warangal, Warangal District 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. 4. Two CCs to the Govt. Pleader for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT) 5 Two CD copies.