IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No. 638 of 1985. Date of Decision: March 4, 2011. Bansari Lal ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus Mulakh Raj and others. ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Gopi Chand, Advocate for the respondents. ***** RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present appeal has been filed against judgment dated 20.12.1984 passed by the then learned Additional District Judge, Faridabad, vide which appeal against judgment dated 14.10.1981 passed by learned trial court dismissing suit of appellant-plaintiff, was dismissed. Perusal of file shows that Shri A.S.Chadha alongwith Shri Lakhinder Singh, Advocate appeared for the appellant when this appeal was admitted on 19.03.1985. However, lateron Shri I.K.Mehta, Advocate appeared for the appellant and filed Vakalatnama. When this case was listed RSA No.638 of 1985 for hearing on 23.09.2008 none appeared for the appellant. Notice was ordered to be issued to the parties for 01.12.2008. Thereafter, notice was ordered to be issued to counsel for the parties. Notice was duly received by counsel for the appellant for today. However, none appeared for appellant despite notice being served upon his counsel. In view of these facts, the present appeal is, hereby, dismissed in default for non-prosecution. ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) March 4, 2011. JUDGE 'om' 2