- 1 - IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT SUIT SUIT NO.1382 OF 1996 NO.1382 OF 1996 NO.1382 OF 1996 Sulochana w/o Ramesh Mehta @ Maun & Anr. ...Plaintiffs vs. Industries Services & Anr. ...Defendants Mr.J.B.Chinai with Mr.Sanjay Jain i/b M/s.Zohair & Co for the Plaintiffs Mr.H.Bhave i/b M/s.Bhave & Co. for Defendant Nos.1 and 3. Mr.S.L.Desai for the Defendant Nos.4 and 5. Ms Lata Wadhwani for defendant No.9. CORAM CORAM CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. A.S.OKA,J. DATE DATE DATE : AUGUST 28,2007 : AUGUST 28,2007 : AUGUST 28,2007 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs and the learned counsel for the defendant Nos.1,3 to 5 and 9 have tendered consent terms on record. The undertakings contained in paragraph 16 of the consent terms are accepted. The learned counsel for the plaintiffs states that the plaintiffs are withdrawing the suit as against the defendant Nos.6 to 8. The name of the second defendant is already deleted as he has expired. 2. The learned counsel for the parties state that the first defendant as also the third defendant, the plaintiff Nos.1A, 1C and 2 are personally present in this court. The counsel for the parties state that none of the parties to the consent terms are minors or under disability. The learned counsel state that the consent terms are duly signed by the parties - 2 - who have agreed that the suit shall be disposed of in terms of the consent terms. 3. The suit against the defendant Nos.6 to 8 stands dismissed as withdrawn. 4. There will be a decree in terms of the consent terms which is marked ‘X’ for identification. 5. The Plaintiffs will be entitled to refund of court fee, if any, as per the rules. 6. Certified copy is expedited. 7. Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE