THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENAKUMARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY. F.C.A.No. 1 5 9 OF 2009. JUDGMENT : (Per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari). Aggrieved of the order dated 31-7-2009 passed in FCOP.No.801 of 2007 by the learned Judge, Family Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, allowing the petition filed by the respondents 1 and 2 herein who are the petitioners 1 and 2 under Order-VII, Rule 1 and 2 and Section 26 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to direct the appellant-respondent No.1(husband) to pay Rs.5,00,000=00 towards marriage expenses of the second respondent-second petitioner and also to direct the respondents 3 and 4-respondents 2 and 3 not to disburse the service-retirement benefits and provident fund benefits to the first respondent-appellant, the appeal is filed. 2. On 10-9-2008, this Court issued notice before admission to Respondents 1 and 2 and in FACMP.No. 315 of 2008 directed the Respondents 3 and 4 herein to withhold retirement benefits of the appellant until further orders. 3. When the matter came up today, Sri Syed Ahmed Ali, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant sought leave of this Court to withdraw this appeal with a leave to avail such remedies as may be available to the appellant in law. Leave is accordingly granted. 4. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. It is needless to observe that if the appellant avails any such remedy, the same shall be considered on its own merits uninfluenced by the dismissal of this appeal. __________________________ JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARI. __________________________ JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY 19-8-2009. I s L