IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 70/2009. (Rakesh Narendra Kediya vs. State of Mah. ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- CORAM : S.R.DONGAONKAR, J. DATE : 23rd APRIL, 2009 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 201/2009 Heard Shri Sirpurar, Advocate for the applicant. Filing of typed copy of the F.I.R. is presently dispensed with. The same be filed as and when directed by the Court. Application disposed of. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 70/2009 Heard Shri Sirpurar, Advocate for the applicant and Shri Thakare, APP, for the respondent. Interim order was passed on 16th January, 2009. The applicant was directed to deposit the amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- as condition attached to that order. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the said amount has been deposited in the Court. Learned APP was asked as to what further investigation was done thereafter i.e. after 16th January, 2009, to know whether there are any other complaints received against the applicant. Nothing is shown. There is no reason now to refuse the confirmation of the interim order. The same is, therefore, confirmed as per the following order. In the event of arrest of the applicant, the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a P.R. Bond of Rs.50,000/- with a solvent surety in the like amount on the condition that he shall appear before the I.O. as and when directed by the I.O. for the purpose of investigation and shall not directly or indirectly tamper with the prosecution evidence. Liberty to the prosecution to move for cancellation of bail if any such instances against the applicant are found later on. Application disposed of. JUDGE Rvjalit