IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9030 of 2010 MAHENDRA SHARMA SON OF LATGE RAM DAHIN SHARMA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHAHAR TELPA, P.S. KARPI IN THE DISTRICT OF ARWAL. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MINOR IRRIGATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF CUM- ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF MINOR IRRIGATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, MUZUFFARPUR, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION CIRCLE, MUZUFFARPUR. 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, BETTIAHA. 7. THE ACCOUNTANT GNERAL ,BIHAR PATNA. ----------- 02. 21.05.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation from the post of Junior Engineer under the respondent no. 6, petitioner is not being paid his retrial dues while fixing the pensionary benefit of 6th pay revision which is effective from 01.01.2006 has not been taken into consideration. Besides the above the claim is that the amount of leave encashment and some dues on account of salary has not been paid till date. 2 Learned counsel appearing for the respondent State submits that the claims of the petitioner needs to be verified from the records. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 6. In such view of the matter, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of six weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner as raised in the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the grievances of the petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)