1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 3919 of 2001 (S/S) (Old No. 25285 of 1996) Satyavir Singh S/o Shri Shiv Charan @ Sukkilal R/o Village Khursi, Post Jatwari District Mathura ………….Petitioner Versus 1. State of U.P. through Consolidation Secretary, U.P. Lucknow. 2. Settlement Officer of Consolidation Haridwar, Roorkee. 3. Assistant Consolidation Officer Narsan Roorkee, Haridwar. …………Respondents. None present for the petitioner. Shri Harendra Belwal, learned standing counsel for the respondents. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J None present for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner, an adhoc employee, who was working as Peon initially for a period of 89 days and terminated from service, has sought continuance in service. 3. In view of the principle of law laid down in Secretary, State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi, reported in (2006) 4 Supreme Court Cases, Pg. 01, wherein it has been held that the workers on daily wages or the persons who get employed without undergoing regular selection process, should not be directed to be absorbed or regularised against the constitutional scheme of public employment, this Court is not inclined to issue direction to regularize services of the petitioner, as such, the petition is liable to be dismissed. 2 4. The writ petition is dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (All pending applications also stand disposed of). Dt. 05.12.2006 (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) S