:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.469 OF 2005 Devidas Ishwar More ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ... Mr. Ujwal R. Agandsurve, for the Applicant. Mr. R.Y. Mirza, A.P.P., for the Respondent. ... CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR,J. 3rd February 2005 P.C.: . Heard Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. As all the relevant records have already been seized, coupled with the fact that the Applicant has already deposited the amount, which is stated to be misappropriated, being sum of Rs.55,000/-, and the Applicant assures to give necessary co-operation for the purposes of investigation and the learned A.P.P. states on instructions that custodial interrogation may not :2: be necessary, the Applicant deserves to be released on anticipatory bail on the following conditions. (A) The Applicant be enlarged on bail in connection with CR.No.109/2004 registered with Mangalwedha Police Station, District Solapur, on executing personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two local sureties in the like amount. (B) The Applicant shall report to the police station for a period of one week betwen 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. and thereafter as and when called upon. (C) The Applicant shall not influence the prosecution witnesses nor shall tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner whatsoever. (D) The Applicant shall extend necessary co-operation to the trial Court for early disposal of the trial. If the trial :3: Court is of the opinion that the Applicant is in any way responsible for delay in disposal of the trial, that fact be recorded in the roznama, which can be a ground for cancellation of bail. . Application disposed of on the above terms. (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)