IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.19460 of 2010 BETWEEN Gajji Pullaiah. ... PETITIONER AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Under Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Lok Naik Bhavan, New Delhi and another. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. KOWTURU VINAYAKA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: MR. ADI VENKATESHWARA RAO GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: ORDER: Petitioner is a pensioner aged 82 years on the date of filing of the writ petition. He has approached this Court aggrieved by the proceedings of the first respondent dated 07.05.2010 calling for re-verification report from the State Government on account of deficiencies found in the information furnished to the Central Government. In the meanwhile, the pension granted to the petitioner was suspended by rejecting the certificate submitted by him as unacceptable. 2. The State Government has filed a counter affidavit and in para 4 it is stated that the Collector, Nalgonda has again furnished fresh re-verification report vide Lr.No.C3/8831/2008 dated 23.04.2011 and a further re-verification report in Lr.No.20673/FF-II(A2)/2011 dated 09.06.2011 and orders of the Central Government are awaited. 3. Counter filed by the first respondent states that the pension granted to the petitioner was suspended for issuing certificate on affidavit and petitioner’s claim will be considered, if required documents are received from the petitioner or the State Government at a later date. 4. In view of the averments in the counter affidavit of State Government that they have already submitted two re-verification reports to the Central Government, the first respondent is directed to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the re-verification reports, referred to above, and pass appropriate orders within two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J December 13, 2011 DSK