"?- MIS' F RFMr'l.J t-fS,(! €L^- / s®^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.GI W.P. fSl N0. ^ 3^ / 2006 PETITIONER ^^^3n k* •»'*(,. ^iy^' ASW°- ^ --••••" Ajay Narayan Sharma Aged about 51 Years, S/o Shri Govind Prasad Sharma Assistant Teacher, Govt. primary School, Chhota, R/o Vinoba Nagar, Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS 1 -cos; oC '^.^'^, E^. 0. VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) The Director Public Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Bilapur District Bilaspur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA y ^3 XI-HC-78 •w^rsRrf^iN; asiT3f1^Tsb>li<o Siibhash ^3- 3^'':W(T?W, »Tflu'ls,l«tdl+iy< U)- p.tJo . 7o36/0^ HI^^I sb*n<fr ^ 200 3TT^?TT^^ (l^gg^ET) ?RTTWH^cT3TI^T 19.12.2006 Shri Romakant Pandey, Aii Shri Sushil bubey, respondents/State. (ocate for the petitioner. 6|overnment Advocste for the With the consent of leari writ petitiors is hear'd finalty. Common order dictated iii open Court, passed separateiy. ^rafcTzfrr WRcTf¥fet^ TfSfFire ^TSTf^ITSTI^T [ned counset for the parties, the Writ Petition (5.5 7035/2026 in Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge P.T.O. HISHCQURT OF CHHATraSGARH AT BILASPUR '. P.(S) No. 703S/2006 Versus ks Premchand bewangan State of Chhattisgarh A othsrs W. P.fS) No. 7036/2006 Petitioner Ver-sus Ajay Narayan Sharma State of Chhattisqarh & others Petitioner ; Smt. Amif (3outam Versus ts : State of Gihattisgar'h A others SB: Hon'bie Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present: Shr-i Ramakfnt Poindey, Adyocate for the petitioner. Siri Sushil Dubey, iSovernment Advocate for the res| ith Tr (Passed or. 19T" day of Oeceffiber, 2006) he following order of the Court is passed by Satish K. A', . J 1. Lsarned counse! appearing for l4ie petitioners as wei! as iearned <?overnment Advoca+e appearing for 1+ie respondentS/State jointly submit that the facts of the writ petition (5) No.s 7035/2006, 7036/2006 aid 7037/2006 are similar to that of in W. P. No. 4725/2006 (Amar 5ai Ram <& others Vs. State of Chhattisqarh A others). which was disposed of vide order dated 1.9.2006 Subhash (Annexure P/2). They further submit that the question of law invofved is also the same. 2. In view of •the above stated submissions made by learned counse! for the parties the wnt petitions are disposed of in terms of tiie order dated 1.9.2006 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 4725/2006. No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be ptaced on record in connected matters. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge ,c •p-•y