KBP 1 cr.wp.3112-11.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3112 OF 2011 Anant Kamalakar Samant .. Petitioner Vs Dinesh Jagannath Pahwa and anr. .. Respondents -- Ms.M.S.Karnik, for petitioner. Mr.Ajay Yadav, for respondent no.1. Ms.M.M.Deshmukh, APP for respondent no.2. Mr.Chavan, P.S.I. Bangurnagar link road Police Station, Mumbai is present. -- CORAM : A.M.KHANWILKAR & R.G.KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 18 th NOVEMBER, 2011 P.C.: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for respondent no.2 State. The petitioner has approached this Court for quashing of F.I.R. We have perused the F.I.R. From the contents of the F.I.R., it does appear that commission of cognizable office is KBP 2 cr.wp.3112-11.odt disclosed. The argument of the petitioner, is that, the dispute is essentially a civil dispute. It is well established position that the dispute may give rise to both kinds of actions namely, criminal or civil. Considering the allegations in the F.I.R., it is not possible to countenance the submissions that no criminality is alleged. Hence, no case for interference is made out in the writ jurisdiction. Petition is dismissed. 2] We make it clear that the observations made in this order will not come in the way of the petitioner in the further proceedings. [R.G.KETKAR, J.] [A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.]