IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No: 6518 of 2002 BETWEEN: M/s. Shilpa Industry, Rep. by its Proprietor, Sri. C. Pundarikam, S/o. Rajaiah, Alampelly, Vikarabad Town, R.R. District. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Superintendent Engineer, Operation Ranga Reddy Circle, Mint Compound, Hyderabad. 2 The Divisional Engineer, Operation, Vikarabad at Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District. 3 The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Operation Central Power Distribution Company A.P. Ltd., Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 to 3 herein in demanding surcharge on Low power factor and fixed charges in respect of the petitioners S.C.No. 4369 vide Bill dated 1.4.2002 for a sum of Rs. 1,08,433/- as arbitrary illegal and without jurisdiction and set aside the same and pass such other order or further orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.N.VASUDEVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR.O.MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in WP.No.15888 of 2001 and batch dated 19.04.2008. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons stated in the aforesaid batch of writ petitions, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the said judgment. However, any amount deposited pursuant to the demand may be adjusted against the future bills or against final demand. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J April 19, 2008 DSK