Sahu HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR WritPetition No. 550 of 2003 PETITIONER RES.PONDENTS Narendra Kumar Parekh, aged about 42 years, S/o Shri Panchilal Parekh, R/o 228 ParekhManson Gudhiyari Raipur (CG). VERSUS 1. Umashankar La'l Shrivastava aged about 82 years, S/o Nathulal Shrivastava. — 2. Smt. Padma Devi Shrivastava aged about 75 years, W/o Shri Umashankar Shrivastava. 3. Suresh Kumar Shrivastava aged about 53 years S/o Shri Umashankar Shrivastava. 4. Naresh Kumar Shrivastava aged about 53 years, S/o Umashankar Lal Shrivastava. 5. -Ramesh Kumar Shrivastava aged about 49 years, S/'o Umashankar Shrivastava. 6. Kumari Bharti Shrivastava aged about 46 years, D/o Umashankar Lal Shrivastava. 7. Dinesh Kumar Sfarivastava, aged about 43 years, S/o Umashankar Lal Shrivastava. 8. Mahesh Kumar Shrivastava, aged about 41 years, S/o Umashankar Lal Shrivastava. All R/'o Main Road Pandari, Tahsil and Distt. Raipur 9. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Collector, Raipur(CG). (WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTtCLE 226 /227 OF THE CONSTTTUnON OF INDIA) tSB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. AsmhotrL J.V ^.—————————„-————„—.- Present : Shri Virendra Sharma, Advocate forthe petitioner. Shri B.P. Sharma, Advocate for the respondentNo. 1 to 8. Shri Rajendra Agrav.'al, PanelLawyer for the State. (1) (2) ORALORDER (Passed on 28th day ofJuIy, 2008) Leamed counsel appearing for tfae petitioner seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition on the ground that this petition has become infmctuous. No objection from other side; It is ordered accordingly. Accordingly, tfae writ petition is dismissed as having [ become intmctuous, No order as to costs.' Sd/- Satish K. Agnihofri Judge \\ •s .fl h^m