IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 15321 of 2009 Between: P. Suraj Kumar, s/o. Ramsingh, R/o. H.No. 8-2-267/19/467 Indira Nagar, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, at Nampally, Hyderabad. 2 The Tahsildar, Shaikpet Mandal, Hyderabad District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent authorities in threatening to demolish the petitioner's house premises bearing H.NO. 8-2-267/19/467 situated at Indira Nagar, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, without issuing any notice any notice and without folowing the due process of law, as being illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents not to demolish or in any manner interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the above said premises, Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.PRAKASH CHAKRAVARTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.NO.15321 OF 2009 ORAL ORDER Apprehending dispossession and demolition of the petitioner’s house bearing House No.8-2-267/19/467, Indira Nagar, Banjara Hills, Hydrabad by the respondents in particular the 2nd respondent the writ petition is filed. Earlier apprehending dispossession, the petitioner filed W.P.No.24038 of 2005 which was however dismissed as withdrawn by the order of this Court dated.21-11-2005. The petitioner alleges that the 2nd respondent is again threatening illegal interference, dispossession and demolition at the instance of the petitioner’s vendor. In respect of such a grievance, the petitioner has several alternative remedies; by way of filing a police complaint; a private complaint; exercising the right of private defence; or by seeking injunctive relief before the civil court of competent jurisdiction. If the petitioner apprehends imminent dispossession, he may seek dispensing with the notice under Section 80(2) CPC. As the petitioner has several alternative efficacious remedies available, this court is not inclined to adjudicate upon his grievance. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue appropriate alternative remedies. No costs. _________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 29th JULY, 2009. *TSNR