CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 23090 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 23090 of 2010 Date of decision: August 17, 2011 Rajesh & another .....Petitioners VERSUS Haryana Staff Selection Commission ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Surender Saini, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana for the State. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. The petitioners applied for appointment to the post of Driver (Heavy Transport Vehicle), who were fully eligible, but have not been called for interview. In reply, it is pointed out that the petitioners were issued roll numbers for holding their Driving Proficiency Test, which was held on 26.11.2010 and 15.11.2010 respectively by the Transport Department, Haryana. The petitioner has statedly remained absent. Counsel for the petitioner makes a grievance that roll numbers were not issued individually, but were issued through public notice. Counsel also claims that the petitioners had gone to the respondents, but no intimation in this regard was ever conveyed to them. Since the petitioners are raising a dispute on facts, CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 23090 of 2010 -2- it would be appropriate to relegate the petitioners to avail their alternative remedy of filing civil suit, where they can establish that they had not received any intimation in regard to holding of a Driving Proficiency Test and then can make a claim for consideration for appointment. Disputed question of fact cannot be gone into in exercise of writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of and the petitioners are relegated to their alternative remedy of filing civil suit. August 17, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) monika JUDGE