1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO.217 OF 2010 ,In WP/5423/2006 PRADIP GYANCHAND RAISONI VERSUS MR. MANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAVA AND ORS ... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.PM Shah, Sr.Counsel h/for Mr. Suryawanshi Nitin B. AGP for Respondents: Mr.GJ Ghute-Patil. ***** CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : 28th NOVEMBER, 2011. PER COURT : 1) Heard learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner. Learned AGP supports the order of the respondent. 2) The orders questioned in contempt petition need not be commented at this stage, with a rider, the orders would be subject to the orders dated 14th September, 2006 recorded in Writ Petition No.5423/2006, and would be ineffective. 3) With above observations, the Contempt Petition is disposed of. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE bdv/