IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.46318 of 2009 1. SARYUG PANDEY 2. Upendra Pandey 3. Satish Kumar Pandey Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----- 2/ 29.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that for the quarrel in between the parties for uprooting vegetable plants, allegation of committing theft of articles is also made only to counter the allegation leveled on informant side by petitioners’ party for the same offence. Even then petitioners are apprehending their arrest which is not justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Kawakole (Rupao) P.S. Case No. 102 of 2009, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nawada subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)