IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7370 of 2010 Ranjeet Kumar, Son of Shri Bindeshwari Yadav, resident of Mohalla Dayachak, P.S. Barh, District Patna ………………………………….………..Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 2. Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna. 3. Deputy Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna………………………………..Respondents ----------- 3 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the Commission. Petitioner has filed this writ application for a direction to the respondents to consider his case for appointment on a vacant post of I.T.I. Instructor in the stream of Fitter Trade, pursuant to advertisement dated 04.08.2007, on the basis of marks secured by him. The case of the petitioner is that pursuant to the said advertisement, he applied for consideration of his candidature on the post. He appeared in the written examination in which he was declared successful, vide Annexure-3. Thereafter he was called for interview. 2 However, in the interview it was found that though petitioner had applied for appointment as I.T.I. Instructor in the stream of Fitter Trade, he had furnished certificate showing practical experience of a Technician. Hence, his candidature was cancelled. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Technician Trade will cover Fitter Trade also. Therefore, respondents should have accepted the said certificate attached to the application so as to enable them to find him eligible for appointment. The advertisement, as contained in Annexure-1, shows that posts of different trades for different categories were disclosed in the chart, but in the list of trades, post of Technician in the stream of fitter trade was not mentioned. In the circumstances, this Court is not satisfied that certificate showing practical experience of a Technician furnished by the petitioner with his application was sufficient compliance of requirements of the advertisement for 3 consideration of his case for appointment against the post of I.T.I. Instructor in the stream of Fitter Trade. Accordingly, this Court does not find any merit in this application. The same is dismissed. BT (J. N. Singh, J.)