IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 19TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 30TH MAGHA 1929 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3409 of 2005(A) ------------------------------ CRA.6/2004 of ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS (ADHOC)-II, THODUPUZHA CC.156/2001 of CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THODUPUZHA .................... REVN. PETITIONER: ACCUSED: -------------------------- SELIN, W/O. ABRAHAM, KANATTU VEETTIL, KOTTAYAMUNNI BHAGOM ARAKULAM KARA AND VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANJAR, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS STATE PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.VINOD VALLIKAPPAN SRI. K.S. SIVAKUMAR, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.R.P. NO. 3409/2005 : 2 : ORDER ON CRL.M.A. NO. 22676/2005 IN CRL.R.P. NO. 3409/2005 DISMISSED 19.02.2008 V. RAKUMAR, JUDGE. V. RAMKUMAR , J. ========================== Crl.R.P. No. 3409 of 2005 ========================== Dated this the 19th day of February, 2008. ORDER The petitioner has been convicted and sentenced by the lower appellate court for an offence punishable under Section 326 IPC. It is the appellate judgment which is assailed in this revision. Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter and a joint petition has been filed under Section 320 Cr.P.C by both the petitioner as well as the de facto complainant stating that the matter has been settled between the parties and seeking permission to compound the offence. Permission is granted and the composition is recorded. It will have the effect of an acquittal of the revision petitioner of the offence punishable under Section 325 IPC in view Section 320(8) Cr.P.C. This Crl. R.P is disposed of as above. V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. rv