Crl. Misc. No. M- 8468 of 2009 Ashu and others vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr.Sarfraj Hussain, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Sidharth Sarup, AAG, Haryana. **** While issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court on 26.3.2009:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that only simple injuries were attributed to the petitioners. Notice of motion for 21.5.2009. In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioners be admitted to interim bail subject to their furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. However, they shall join the investigation as and when called and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.” Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Suraj Mal, has submitted that the petitioners have joined investigation and are not required for further investigation. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the order granting interim bail dated 26.3.2009 is made absolute. (SABINA) JUDGE May 21, 2009 anita