IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 6620 of 2008 Between: 1 M/s Visakha SC,ST Scavengers Sweepers & Substute Badili Workers Welfare Society Regd No.211/97, rep by its President B.Mokalingam, S/o.Ramayya, aged 51 years , D.No.36-33-24, Ramanna Colony, Ambedkar Nagar, visakhapatnam-7 2 SC,ST Scavengers Sweepers & Substute Badili Workers Welfare Society Regd No.906/97, rep by its President B.Lakshmana Rao, S/o.Simhadri, aged 33 years , D.No.39-34-92, Ambedkar Nagar, visakhapatnam-7 3 Ome Sri Sai Ram SC,ST Badili Workers Welfare Society Regd No.913/98, rep by its President D.Ramana, S/o.Bhagavathi Rao, aged 38 years ,R/o. D.No.13-414, Ambedkar Nagar, Sector-2 Arilove,visakhapatnam 4 Srama Sakthi Parisudya Badili Panivarala Sankshema Sangam,Reg No.596/99, rep by its President V.Rama Devi, D/o. Gurumurthy, aged 31 years, R/o.MIG-2 , Sector-3, MVP Colony, Relliveedhi, Visakhapatnam-17. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Greater Vishakapatnam Municipal Corporation, Rep by its commissioner, Visakhapatnam, 2 The Greater Vishakapatnam Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Additional commissioner, Visakhapatnam, 3 The Greater Vishakapatnam Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Chief Medical Officer of Health, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the tender notification in Rc.No.2153/2007/PH/F3, dt. 19.03.2008 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of the G.O.Ms.No.581, M.A. dated 06.11.1996 and also contrary to the standing committee resolution dt. 09.05.2002 and pass such other or further orders. Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.T.S.VENKATARAMANA Counsel for the Respondents: MR.N.RANGA REDDY (SC FOR MPL. CORP. VSP) The Court made the following : O R D E R: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the cause of action in this writ petition does not survive since the work has already been allotted pursuant to the tender notification impugned in the writ petition. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous at the admission stage. No costs. ______________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J. Date:18th July, 2008. cs .....ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1. 2 CCs 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{LS}