(1) CRI. APP. 3811.2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3811 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant VERSUS Shivaji Kishanrao Bhosle and others .. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3834 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant VERSUS Ganesh Kishanrao Bhosle and others .. Respondent ... Mr. D.R. Korde, APP for the applicant-State Mr. M.V. Deshpande, Advocate for the respondents 1 to 3 ... CORAM : A.V. NIRGUDE, J. DATED : 17TH MARCH, 2010 PER COURT:- 1] Both these Applications can be decided by this common order:- . The State prefers these two applications: one for seeking enhancement of the sentence awarded to the original accused no.1 and (ii) for challenging the acquittal of original accused nos. 2 to 4. 2] Having regard to the evidence that is discussed in the judgment of the lower Court, I see no reason why there should be any further interference in the conclusion drawn by the learned (2) CRI. APP. 3811.2009 Judge of the lower Court as far as the acquittal of the original accused nos. 2 to 4 are concerned. 3] Criminal Application no.3811 of 2009 seeking leave to file Appeal is dismissed whereas Criminal Application no. 3834 of 2009 seeking leave to file appeal is allowed. Leave is granted. Appeal is admitted. Appeal memo be filed within prescribed period. This Appeal shall be heard alongwith Criminal Appeal no. 347 of 2009. Sd/- (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.) arp