IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1045 OF 1998 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: JANUARY 16, 2012 Pritpal Singh .... Appellant Versus Ved Pal & others .... Respondents CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. PRESENT: Mr. Rajvir Singh, Advocate for Mr. S. N. Chopra, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for respondents No. 8 and 9. Mr. I. S. Pabla, Advocate for respondent No.10. * * * * L.N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL) Appellant has moved CM No.3870-C of 2011 alleging that parties have effected compromise Annexure C-1 in support whereof appellant's attorney Mohinder Singh and respondents No.9 and 10 have affirmed affidavits Annexures C-2 to C-4 respectively. Learned counsel for respondents No.8 to 10 admitted the aforesaid compromise and affidavits and have no objection if the appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise. The appeal has thus been lawfully compromised. Accordingly CM No.3870-C of 2011 is allowed and regular second appeal No.1045 of 1998is disposed of in terms of compromise Annexure C-1, which shall form part of judgment and decree sheet. (L. N. MITTAL) JUDGE 16.01.2012 'raj'