J—^ -F C-22 •s^ •-t<|i|l<rl'i), ^ifly'l'i, fawi'uy Sd^T T^3R ^WVfl g^jq;——•———••——-———^[p^ ^gg •1W^T" sii^r^ii R'<i?t) 311^1 5t>^ tif&a 311^1 TOiraT^tfeT S.B. HON'BLE SHRI DHIRENDlKA MISHRA, J W.P. 227 No.3 Writ petltion under Arflcle PEyriTIONER RESPONDENTS Teji ct)i'4l<n41i ^\H^. ^ f^%^ <^-^i< ^siNtian^r 066 OF 2008 227 ofthe Constitutipn of Indlia Naitesh Kumar Sahu, S/o. Shri •am Sahu, aged about 40 yea]rs, Sarpanch of Grain Pai^cliayat Belar, R/o. VUlage aiid Pos]t Belar, Via-Pingeshwar, Dis|trict Raipur (CG) VER 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. iUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of Panchayat, DKS Bhawan, Raipiir (CG) The Dlrector, Panchayat, Raipur (CQ) Additional Collector, Gariyaband, District Raipur (CG) Sub-Divisional Officer, Ganyaband, District Raipur (CG) Additional Tahsildar, Fingeshwar, TAhsil and District Ralpur (CG) i<aq Ite^efS '^syistti 'aW* '"-ia^si- iC-22 sn^i'qii R'lifb 3!^y ?nH -^^ F -3^ ^iffqRFI, •8'dl'y'IS. facil'My ST[^?T ira^ tllicil a>*<ich"""""""""""""""""""""^ 200 fe^T""""" an^i wirar flfei 1. 20.6.2008 Shri Raghvendra Shri Arun Sao, GA fo4 By thls petition, th|( jurisdiction of fhe Directo^- entertaintng a revision cbl'4[(yl4l'r1 iTPTcTf ^ 1^1[^ •(I^K^R ^siPgiTan^r 6. Motilal Ratre, Upsarpanch. 7. Neelkanth Sahu, Panch 8. Dushyant Ram, Panch 9. Hemuram Sahu, Panch 10. Sadhuram Sahu, Panch 11. Tamal Ram Sahu, Panch 12. Amar Singh Sahu, Panch 13. Rup Ram, Panch 14. Tirath Ram Sahu, Panch 15. Sewak Sahu. Panch No.6 to 15 all Panch, Gram Panchayat-Belar, Vikas-khand Fingeshwar, Tahsil Rajisa, District Raipur (CG) Pradhan ra.4han, counsel for the petiUoner. the State/respondents No. 1 to 5. je petitioner has questioned fhe \, Panchayat/respondent No. 2 in ag^dnst the interiin order passed by •1 f1qt^ ^Ha^i sn^rqir P<-<i.°k 31)^1 ^flcf> •^fsd T •TS? -^WM^, ^W6. hwvy. 3TI^T TI^SR t7 HW<11 g,KJq)-------------'g^ 200 fc|()il8T"""""""""""""""" ' sn^i's^tiwsfea <*i^Ici'41-i wraf ^^S <P>]*<;|< ^i'sipgnaD^r the Additional Collector/res|pondent No.3 in a reference under Section 21(4) ofthe Pancha^at Raj AdMniyam, 1993 • Leamed counsel for |fhe petitioner subinits fhat fhe Director, Panchayat/respon|dent No. 2 is proceeding with (he revision petition filed by fh<t respondents No. 6 to 15 against the order ofAdditional CoU^ctor/respondent No.3, though fhe revision petition is not m^ mipugned order it is Panchayat/respondent No.^ maintainabillty of fhe reilision petition and has further directed to issue notice to tt| Leamed counsel for petition m.ay be disposed c^ raise preliminaiy objection| revision petition, whlch Panchayat/respondent No.] matter. untainable. From. perusal of the evident that the Director, has posted the matterto hear on ^e caveator inthis regard. jthe petitioner submits that this i|f with Uberty to the petiUoner to regarding m.auitainabilily of fhe i4ay be decided by the Director, B before further hearing in fhe Leamed counsel apjpearing for the State has no objection if the petition is prayed for by fhe petitioner. yisposed of wifh the direction as ['Tft^ ^S^t IC-22 Stl^T^T , fc-<i+ 3I1JRI ^)Hl<iti -Hf^ T •^sf ri\w\v\^, ri-dl'y'id. fawi^y 3TI^T 'q=rai tlltiMI ^,^jc|,----"-----"--'g^ 200 |c|'b<81" 311^1'S^IIWBf?^ In view of above, the fl llberty to the petitioner regard to maintainabUity (^ Director, Panchayat/respo^ wifh fhe Diatter only after d tb .t/respo^ident i|nstant petition is disposed ofwifh file preliaiinary objection with \f fhe revision petition before fhe No. 2, who shall proceed ^ciding the prelmunary objection. IANo.01,application fo^- uiterim relief stands disposed of. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge shi^ifi'i'il'i im^f'? fest <Fiitei< i? 3ifigH gn^f [^t^^fe^ iilli