IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. APPELLATE JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION NO. 7347 OF 2011 Mr.Uttam Babaji Suryaanshi. ... Petitioner. V/s. Ms.Supriya, D/o Neeta. ... Respondent. Ravindra V. Sankpal for the petitioner. CORAM: R.M.BORDE, J. DATED : 12th September 2011. P.C. : An application tendered by the petitioner for issuance of witness summons to the Officer-In-Charge of National Securities Depository Ltd. has been turned down by the trial Court. On perusal of the contents of the application, it is evident that the petitioner wanted to examine witness so as to bring on record the pan-card details pertaining to the respondent. The learned trial Court while rejecting the application has directed the respondent to produce on record her pan-card. It is stated by the counsel for the petitioner that the matter is at the stage of consideration of application for grant of maintenance during the pendency of the proceeding. At this preliminary stage of the proceeding, such detailed enquiry is not expected. In any case in exercise of extra ordinary powers conferred under Article 227 of the Constitution and in view of law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Shalini Shyam Shetty v. Rajendra Shankar Patil, (2010) 8 SCC 329, this is not a fit case for causing interference. Writ petition is devoid of any substance and stands dismissed. (R.M.BORDE, J.)