RFA No. 5388 of 2008 (1) In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh RFA No. 5388 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.1.2011 Jaswinder Singh ... Appellant vs State of Haryana and another .... Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: None for the appellant. Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Gitish Bhardwaj, Advocate for Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate, for respondent no. 2. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowner is in appeal before this court against the award of the learned court below passed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Brief facts of the case are that vide notification dated 16.3.1999, issued under Section 4 of the Act, land situated in revenue estate of Village Saketri, Hadbast No. 376, Tehsil and District Panchkula was sought to be acquired by the State of Haryana for development and utilisation as residential, commercial, institutional, recreational area in Sectors 1, 2, 3, 5B, 5C and 6, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula. The Land Acquisition Collector vide his award dated 9.10.2003 assessed the market value. The landowner feeling dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Collector, filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the learned court below determined the market value of the acquired land @ ` 418/- per square yard. It is this award which is impugned in the present appeal. Learned counsel for the respondents very fairly conceded that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in RFA No. 3008 of 2008– Smt. Poonam vs State of Haryana RFA No. 5388 of 2008 (2) and another decided on 25.2.2009, whereby the appeals arise out of the same acquisition have been decided and the matters were remitted back for fresh consideration. Accordingly, for the detailed reasons recorded in Smt. Poonam's case (supra), the appeal is disposed of in the same terms. The parties are directed to appear before the learned District Judge, Panchkula, on 17.2.2011. The learned District Judge will club the reference with other cases earlier referred back by this Court. 21.1.2011 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge