THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Contempt Case No.994 of 2010 (Dated : 07-9-2010) Between: Asauddin Khan S/o Nawab Himayat Nawaj Jung Bahadour ….Petitioner A n d Mr.Sameer Sharma Commissioner, GHMC …Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Contempt Case No.994 of 2010 ORDER: This contempt case has been filed complaining disobedience of the order dated 20.5.2010 passed in Writ Petition No.11555 of 2010. Notice before admission came to be ordered on 16.7.2010. The respondent entered appearance and filed counter. It is stated in the counter that development of park and path-way for the benefit of the general public has been commenced in the earmarked area covered by L.P.No.7141/84. Para 10 of the counter affidavit need to be noted and it reads as hereunder:- “ The Vice Chairman, HUDA vide Lr.No.7141/HUDA/MP2/84, dated 21-04-1987, released the said lay out duly stipulating certain conditions. According to condition No.16 relating to the open place earmarked for public purpose in the area covered by the L.P.No.7141/84 shall be handed over to the local authority. Accordingly, M/s.IDPL Employees Co-op House Building Society Ltd, TBC No.230, registered under Andhra Pradesh Co-op Societies Act, 1964 having its office at Room No.17, Field Hostel, IDPL Colony, P.O., Balanagar Township, Hyderabad-37, represented by its Secretary handed over to the Respondents through Gift Settlement Deed document No.794/1987, dated 27-10-1987. Now the respondents commenced the development of park & path way for the benefit of the general public and also the residents. Therefore, the allegations are denied”. When the contempt case came up for consideration, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The interim order passed in the writ petition reads as hereunder:- “ There shall be status quo existing as on today with regard to laying of any walking track in the land owned by the petitioner”. It is explicit from the counter affidavit that the path way is being laid on the area earmarked and handed over to the respondent through gift settlement deed bearing Document No.794/1987. Such is the situation; the contention of the petitioner that the respondent has violated the status quo order passed by this Court has no substance. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No costs. _____________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J Dt.07-09-2010 RAR THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Contempt Case No.994 of 2010 (Dated : 07-9-2010)