IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1844 of 2008 Bal Kishore Yadav s/o Srijai Narain Yadav, resident of Village- Godhiya, P.S. Maithebara, District- Madhepura ---------Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through Secretary, Panchayat Raj, Bihar,Patna 2. The Divisional Commissioner, Koshi Division, Madhepura 3. The District Magistrate, Madhepura 4. The District Education Officer, Madhepura 5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Madhepura 6. The Block Development Officer, Madhepura Block, Madhepura 7. Rupesh Kumar S/O Peeloo Yadav, resident of Godhia, P.S. Madhepura, District-Madhepura 8. Sanjay Kumar S/O Sikandar Yadav, resident of Godhia, P.S. Madhepura, District-Madhepura ------- Respondents. ----------- 2 23.06.2011 When the case is called out, no body appears for the petitioner. Learned Counsel for the respondent state appears and points out that the petitioner was elected as Mukhiya and he has moved this Court in the present writ application being aggrieved by a direction issued by the respondent no.5 against him to make payment of honorarium to the private respondent. Learned counsel also points out that fresh elections have been held this year and in that view of the matter, there cannot be any occasion for the then Mukhiya to feel aggrieved by any 2 direction given to him in the of capacity of Mukhiya and, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. The Court finds the submission of the learned counsel to be valid. The writ is dismissed having become infructuous. Sudha ( Ahsanuddin Amanullah ,J.),