IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.17782 of 2010 Date of Decision : September 30, 2010. Kabal @ Kabul Singh .....Petitioner versus The Amritsar Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. and others ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vipul Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner alleges that recovery of Rs.2000/- per month is being effected from him allegedly to make good the loss of Rs.62,000/- caused to the respondent-bank. It is obvious that the recovery is being effected pursuant to some order whereby the petitioner must have been held responsible for causing such loss. If that is so, the petitioner is well within his right to impugn that order in the departmental appeal. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondent-bank to supply the recovery order, if any, passed against the petitioner within one week from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and the petitioner, if so advised, may impugn the same before the appellate authority in accordance with law. Dasti. September 30, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE