- 1 - fr.872 rng IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 872 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1156 OF 2011 Shri Firoz Sherali Khan .. Appellant vs The Municipal Corpn.of Gr.Mumbai .. Respondent Mr.B.P.Shukla for Appellant Ms.K.K.Soran for Respondent CORAM: J.H.BHATIA, J DATE: 8 th August,2011 P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The appeal is preferred by the original plaintiff against refusal of the ad interim relief pending Notice of Motion. According to him, no notice has been issued by the Municipal Corporation for removal or demolition of the suit shop but, he is - 2 - fr.872 threatened of such a removal/demolition. As the learned counsel for the Municipal Corporation states that if notice is not issued the Municipal Corporation will follow the law and will file a reply before the trial Court. 3. In view of the above, in my opinion, the Appeal may be disposed of with following directions : (i)The Respondent-Municipal Corporation shall file reply and/or written statement before the trial Court within four weeks and the Trial Court shall hear and dispose of the Notice of Motion within six weeks thereafter. Till the disposal of the Notice of Motion, the Municipal Corporation shall not act otherwise than by due process of law. Appeal and Application stand disposed of accordingly. J.H.BHATIA, J