1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1908 OF 2008 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1909 OF 2008 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1910 OF 2008 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1911 OF 2008 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1912 OF 2008 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1913 OF 2008 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1914 OF 2008 AND INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2076 OF 2008 AND WEALTH TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2077 OF 2008 AND WEALTH TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2078 OF 2008 AND WEALTH TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2079 OF 2008 Commissioner of Income-tax, Central II, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus Smt.Jyoti H. Mehta ..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.A.K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 26th JUNE, 2009 P.C. : 1. Heard. Registry is directed to register all these appeals. Office 2 objections, if any in these appeals are over-ruled. By consent of parties, all these appeals are taken up for hearing. 2. Both parties agree that the issue sought to be raised in these appeals is covered by the two judgments of this Court being Income Tax Appeal No.675 of 2008 CIT V/s. M/s.Growmore Research & Asset Management Limited, Mumbai decided on 10-2-2009 and by another order passed in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1890 OF 2008, CIT V/s. Late Shri Harshad S. Mehta decided on 5-3-2009. 3. In this view of the matter, we see no substantial questions of law arising in all these appeals. All the appeals are thus dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)