IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5360 of 2001 RAM MURAT RAI & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 5 23/1/2009 Heard counsel for the petitioners and Mr. V.Nath, counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.8 as also counsel for the State. Counsel for the petitioners, who has filed supplementary affidavit without serving a copy of the same to the counsel for respondent no.8, has submitted that whatever relief were sought in this writ application actually had already been granted to them and therefore this writ application has become infructuous. He, in fact, has tried to refer to certain documents in the supplementary affidavit incorporating subsequent events to submit that only that on account of pendency of this writ application, further steps are not being taken by the Respondents. This Court, without expressing any opinion on the aforementioned submission, would accord permission to the petitioners to withdraw this application. This application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar