Criminal Revision No.1132 of 2003 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.1132 of 2003 Date of Decision : 13.01.2011. Shyama ......Petitioner Versus Sanjay Kumar and others ......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present: Mr. N.D. Achint, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Hemant Bassi, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Satyavir Singh Yadav, D.A.G. Haryana. NAWAB SINGH J. (ORAL) Challenge is to the order dated September 12th, 2002 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hisar, whereby, complaint filed by Shyama-petitioner against the respondents was dismissed. Rekha, daughter of petitioner, was married with Sanjay Kumar-respondent No.1 on April 27th, 1998. At the time of marriage, Shyama-petitioner-mother of the bride spent a large amount of money and also provided appropriate dowry articles to her. On January 21st, 2001, Rekha committed suicide. On the statement of father of Rekha, First Information Report No.58 dated January 28th, 2001 was recorded in Police Station City, Hisar under Sections 304- B and 498-A of Indian Penal Code against Pardeep @ Pappal younger brother of Sanjay Kumar. By judgment dated May 7th, 2002, Pardeep @ Pappal was acquitted by Additional Sessions Judge, (Ad- hoc) Hisar observing that there was no demand for dowry by any of the family members of in-laws of Rekha nor was she ever maltreated by any of them including Pardeep @ Pappal. During trial, prosecution filed an application under Section of 319 of Code of Criminal Criminal Revision No.1132 of 2003 (2) Procedure for summoning the respondents herein but the said application was declined by the trial Court which was not challenged by the petitioner or the State meaning thereby the said order of dismissing the application has attained finality. After acquittal of Pardeep @ Pappal, petitioner filed the present complaint which was dismissed by the impugned order for the reasons aforesaid. In view of above, this Court is of the opinion that the order passed by the Court below was justified and requires no interference. Dismissed. (NAWAB SINGH) JUDGE 13.01.2011. SN