IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2010 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 RP.No. 1123 of 2010(H) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.15192/2006 dated 27/10/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER : 5TH RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------- APPUKUTTAN ACHARI, NADAYIL VADAKKETHIL, MULAMKADAKOM P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.KARTHIKEYA PANICKER SMT.DAYA K. PANICKER RESPONDENTS: --------------- 1. MULAMKADAKAM TEMPLE TRUST, MULAMKADAKAM, KOLLAM WEST VILLAGE, KOLLAM REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT DR.A.MOHANRAJ, PIN-691 012. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHEIF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 3. KOLLAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-601 001. 4. SECRETARY, KOLLAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KOLLAM-691 001. 5. MAYOR, KOLLAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KOLLAM-691 001. 6. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, KOLLAM-691 001. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.V.MANU ADVOCATE P.B.SURESH KUMAR FOR R1 STANDING COUNSEL SRI.M.K.CHANDRAMOHANDAS FOR R3 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.N.RAVINDRAN, J. --------------------------- R.P. No. 1123 OF 2010 IN W.P.(C) No. 15192 OF 2006 -------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of December, 2010 O R D E R Heard Sri. K.Karthikeya Panicker, the learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner. A reading of the review petition discloses that what the petitioner seeks is a rehearing of the writ petition, which is not permissible in an application for review. I therefore find no grounds to entertain the review petition. The review petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. P.N.RAVINDRAN, (JUDGE) vps WPC No. 2 WPC No. 3