sat 1 wp 1267-2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1267 OF 2011 Ajit Dhanji Mahida ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Rahul Arote for the Petitioner. Mrs.P.P. Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM : B.H. MARLAPALLE & U.D. SALVI, JJ. JULY 8, 2011 P.C. :- 1 In our Order passed on 17th June, 2011, we have noted down the statement made by the learned APP that the investigation in CR No.533/2010 was almost complete and the final report would be filed within two weeks. 2 The leaned APP now states that the concerned Investigating Officer could not remain present and sat 2 wp 1267-2011 therefore, she has no instructions whether the final report has been submitted to the concerned court. 3 We have perused the statement of the complainant recorded while registering CR No.533/2010 and in our view, a prima facie case for investigation has been made out. It was submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the said complaint was filed by way of retaliation as the petitioner, who was a Police Constable, had already registered an FIR against the Bar owner. These allegations and counter allegations will have to be gone into at the time of trial and we direct the final report in CR No.533/2010 be submitted, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case, before 31st July, 2011 to the concerned Court. 4 Save and except the above directions, the petition stands disposed. 5 If the petitioner is aggrieved by the final sat 3 wp 1267-2011 report, so submitted, he is not prevented from taking further appropriate steps. (U.D. SALVI, J) (B.H. MARLAPALLE, J)