WP 7488/11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7488/2011 Nanda Naganna Totawar V/s The State & others. _______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | Shri R.R. Mantri, Advocate for petitioner. Shri K.G. Patil, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 2. Shri S.B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for respondent nos.3 & 4. CORAM: B.R. GAVAI & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Date: 30.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of the order dated 16.11.2011, the petitioner has been now permitted to join at Sawali Tq.Mukhed. In that view of the matter, the grievance of the petitioner, insofar as the prayer clause (B) is concerned, does not survive. Insofar as the prayer clause (A) is WP 7488/11 2 concerned, needless to state that it is on account of the mistakes committed by the authorities, the petitioner was made to run from pillar to post. In that view of the matter, the petitioner would be entitled to the salaries during the period, though she could not actually render her services. Insofar as the prayer clause (C) is concerned, the learned counsel for the petitioner apprehends that the suspension order issued against the petitioner would be acted upon by the respondent authorities. Shri S.B. Pulkundwar, learned counsel for the respondent - Zilla Parishad, makes a categoric statement that the said suspension would not be acted upon. In any case, we must give some allowance to the respondent - authorities that they have wisdom to understand that if citizens are persecuted for seeking redressal of their grievance from the Court of law, the Court can very well take cognizance of the same and take necessary action. WP 7488/11 3 The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. (M.T. Joshi, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.) Dt/- 30.11.2011 ndk/c3011118