(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4504 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4504 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4504 OF 2004 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 29412 OF 2004 FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 29412 OF 2004 FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 29412 OF 2004 The Ichalkaranji Municipal Council Ichalkaranji ...Applicant Versus Nagesh Rajaram Shelke & Ors ...Respondents ..... Shri. T.S.Ingle, counsel for the Applicant ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 16TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 16TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 16TH DECEMBER, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant. None appears for Respondents though served. 2. By this Civil Application the Applicant is seeking condonation of 78 days’ delay. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide. Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). ***** (-2-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4505 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4505 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4505 OF 2004 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 29412 OF 2004 FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 29412 OF 2004 FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 29412 OF 2004 The Ichalkaranji Municipal Council Ichalkaranji ...Applicant Versus Nagesh Rajaram Shelke & Ors ...Respondents ..... Shri. T.S.Ingle, counsel for the Applicant ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 16TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 16TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 16TH DECEMBER, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Rule. Rule made returnable on 13.3.2006. 2. Pending further orders, there shall be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to the Applicant depositing entire decreetal amount within a period of six weeks from today. *****