IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 3RD JULY 2008 / 12TH ASHADHA 1930 RP.No. 657 of 2008() -------------------- ( M.F.A. NO.1101/2001 OPMV NO.858/94 OF MACT, PUNALUR PETITIONERS : PETITIONERS ----------------- 1. SECRETARY AND COMMERCIAL MANAGER, OIL PALM INDIA LTD., P.B. NO.53, VEETTIL ESTATE, MUTTAMBALAM KOTTAYAM. 2. MANAGING DIRECTOR, OIL PALM INDIA LTD. DO. BY ADV. SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR SRI.A.K.JAYASANKAR NAMBIAR SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS ------------- 1. P.S. VIJAYALAKSHMI, GANAPATHIVILAKAM, KALUTHUPUZHA. 2. S. PRASANNA KUMARI, DO. DO. 3. S. USHAKUMARI, DO. DO. 4. S. MURALEEDHARAN PILLAI, DO. DO. 5. RAJENDRA PRASAD, OIL PALM QUARTERS, BHARATHEEPURAM, YEROOR. 6. HAKKIM, DRIVER, PLOT NO.143, 12 CENTS, KUZHIVILAKARAIKOM, SAM NAGAR PO, KULATHUPUZHA. 7. DISTRICT INSURANCE OFFICER, KSFC BUILDING, CHINNAKKADA, KOLLAM - 691 001. BY THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: P.R.RAMAN & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R.P.No.657/2008-C in M.F.A.No.1101/2001 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Dated this the 3rd day of July, 2008 O R D E R RAMAN, J. M.F.A.No.1101/2001 was filed beyond the time limit. Hence, C.M.Appln. No.7828/2001 was filed for condonation of delay. By order dated 18/12/2007, this Court found that no sufficient grounds had been found to condone the delay. Accordingly, the delay petition was dismissed and, consequently, the appeal was also dismissed. The present petition is sought to review that order. 2. According to the petitioner, the order refusing to condone the delay suffers from an error apparent on the face of the order. We have gone through the order. We do not find any error. The order impugned in the appeal was passed on 15/02/2000. Certified copy was applied only on 27/04/2000. Thereafter, the copy was delivered on 29/06/2000 and the appeal was filed only in 2001. Thus, indisputably there is delay in filing the appeal. This Court, after considering the averments in the affidavit filed in support of the condonation of delay found that no sufficient grounds had been made out in the matter. No additional materials are also placed. R.P.No. 657 of 2008 -: 2 :- In view of the above, there is absolutely no ground for review as sought for. Accordingly, this review petition is dismissed. P.R.RAMAN, Judge T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, Judge ms