WP(C) 2981/2011 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The petitioners claim that they were selected for appointment as LP School teach ers in Dhing Constituency and their names were reflected in the purported select list of 1.11.1999 (Annexure-1). The petitioners refer to the judgment and order dated 4.12.2003 in WP(C) No.5622/99 and also the order dated 4.3.2004 passed in WP(C) No.1419/04 to pray that, similar direction for consideration of their app ointment be given for the present petitioners. However it is pointed out by Mr. MR Pathak, learned standing counsel for the Edu cation Department that in the judgment in WP(C) No.5622/99, a question mark was raised on the legality of the select list and whether the said list was ever app roved, by the competent authority. It is also submitted that the petitioners hav e belatedly approached the Court and therefore, no direction for their appointme nt can be given, on the basis of a doubtful select list of 1999. Although the petitioners make allegation of appointment being given in the year 2007 to some non selected persons, considering that those appointments were give n on 2.8.2007, I see no enforceable legal right of the petitioners to seek appoi ntment, on the basis of such an old select list. It may also be recorded that me re enlisting of names in the select list, does not give any right of appointment . In view of above, the case is found to be devoid of merit and the same is dismis sed.