SI Q^ c ^•loof'^' MPM IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BIIASPUR fCHHATnSGARHl WRFT PETITION N0.539-^ /2006. u PETITIONER: ^F. ^M^-"... ^-y ..-••' II'Q- ?y" ^^••••"" ^" ,»' -\-.' Respondents / .cP^.^ ^ fl y ^/ Alen Kumar Gupta S/o Nadia Lal Gupta, aged about 40 years, residence ofRisali Sector 166/B, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. VERSUS 1. State of Chhatdsgarh, Through The Secretary School Education Department Ministry D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ^ 2. Director of School Mucation Officet, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The District By.ucation Officer, Bemetara, Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4. F>rincipal, Govt. Girls Higher Secondary, School, Saja, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OP MANDAMUS. CERTIORARI. PROHffimON AND FOR THE OTHER SIMILAR WRIT OR WRITS. ORDER OR ORDERS. DIRECTION OR DIRECT10NS. XI-HC-22 3TI^T9ir R-li+SfI^T TOgf^T S1111»« / f V Baivt Hoto :-y <y" 3^ '<<1<<ICI<), (Si-rfld'IS, Islvlltly ^f.....^^.\J.P.^. *(l*4Wl sniich ----••--•-•--^-•••••-g^ 200 ftre^; -^p an^TS^nwflfer •/-. Heard Shri O.P. Sahu, couns Govt. Advocate for the State/respond^ The case of the petitioner is since 28-6-86 and as per the lnstruc| M.P. the Assistant Teachers whc| examlnation on their own expenses increments and order of Government B. Ed. examination on his own cosl effect is Annexure-P/5, but the pf whereas, similarly situated persons under the orders of the Tribunaland Having heard learned couns^ and circumstances ofthe oase, case, the petitioner is aliowed to ma| ofthis petition raising all his grievan^ days from today and in tum, respone the petitioner in the light of avermenj in the representation also. If re; similarly situated persons have b( increments and the petitioner's cas) increments on the basis of Governf period of 3 months from today, in a', With the dlrection aforesaid, fi Parties are entitled for certifield withdut »i<if<n41-li|titiTfffeiA<Riwi< ^;3l1^IT3n^T ;] for the petitioner and Shri Sumesh Bajaj, ants, on advance copy. that tie is '.wrking as Assistant Teacher (ions dated 24-12-98 issued by the State of have passed B.T.I., B.Ed. and M.Ed. er 22-10-64 are entitled for two advance is Annexure-P/1. The petitioner passed his in ttie year 1992 and a certificate to that ^titioner has not been given the benefit |ave been granted two advance increments this Court vide Annexure-P/6. for the parties, having regard to the facts expressing any opinion ofthe merit ofthe ^e a detailed representation along with copy tes to respondent No.3 'A'ithin a period of 15 lient No.3 is directed'to examine the case of [s made by the petitioner in this petition and scjndent No.3 reaches to the conclusion that aen granted the benefit of tv/o advance is- also covered for grant of two advance ;nent's order, then to pass orders within a cdordance with law. petition stands'disposed of. yofthisorder. Sd.)- L.C.BhedOo Judge pcjndent tie Cfl^y^)