C^r V^ST_ SINGLE BENOI IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.S.NO. ^ys^- /io PETITIONER Satya Sharma, S/o J.P.Sharma, aged about 46 years, Lab Tech. Zoology Gramya Bhariti Vidyapith, Hardi Bazar, Korba (C.G.) RESPONDENTS ..•' ^^ €^"' wyy VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh , Through Secretary, Department ofHigher Education, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) 2. • Director, Higher Education, Directorate Raipur (C.G.) 3.' Shashtri Shikshan Samiti, Through its Secretary,Gramya Bharti Vidyapith (Mahavidyalaya) Hardi Bazar, Korba (C.G.) 9' WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 'S) HIGH COIQCT OP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SB : HO BLE SHm JUSTICB PRITraKBRDIWAKBR W.P.(S»»0.5792/2010 PBTITIONBR Satva Shanna Versus RESPONDENTS State ofC.G. & Others WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THS CONSTITUTION 05- INDIA Shri Neeraj Choubey, cozinsel for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Dy. A.G. for the State/resps. 1 ORDBR &2. Grievance 6f the petitioner ia fhe present petition is that he is the einployee of Goveminent Aided private educational institution and though he is entitted for the benefit of 6& Pay Coiiunission as recoininended bv the Ctoveraiaent. for the govemment employees but fhe sanie has not been given to him. According to the petitioner earUer also when the benefit of 5th Pay Commission was refused to petitioner aad siuularly placed persons, writ petitions were filed before fhis Court and ultimately after passuig of order by fhis Court the toenefit of 5th Pay Conimission was granted to fheui. » 2. Coiuisel for the petitioner subiaits fhat ends of justice woirid be served if at this stage fhe petitioner is permltted to withdraw this petition aad direction be issued to the lespondent N0.1 for deciding the pending representation of the petitioner (Annexure P/5) dated 11.6.2010. 3. Counsel appearmg for fhe State submits that fhe representation has been made by fhe petitioner directly to fhe Chief Minister whereas he is required to inake suitable representation to respondent N0.1. He submits that the case of B b fhe petitioner aad smularly placed persons for graiit of 6th Pay CoDimission is au-eadv under consideration aad let the petitioner inake a fresh representation and fhe same would be decided in accordance with law. 4. Accordiiigly, the petitioner is pennitted to withdraw this petition with fhe aforesaid liberty. In the eventuality of filing a fi-esh reprcsentation by tbe petitioner before fhe respondent N0.1 wifhia a period of one month froin the date of receipt of copy of fhis order, it is expected from the said authoritiies to pass appropriate order as expeditiously as possible preferably wifhia a period offour naonths fi-oia fhe date ofits receipt. 5. It is inade clear fhat this Court has not expressed any opinion on inerits of fhe case and fhe authority concemed would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. —-——___ Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge TIu,