IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD FEBRUARY 2010 / 14TH MAGHA 1931 WP(Crl.).No. 39 of 2010(S) ---------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- YAMUNA SATHYAN, W/O.K.P.SATHYAN, KOTTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, KADUNGAMANGALAM. BY SENIOR ADVOCATE SHRI M.C. SEN. & ADV. SRI.V.B.UNNIRAJ SMT.R.S.GEETHA RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MULANTHURUTHY POLICE STATION, MULANTHURUTHY. 3. ISSAC DEVASSY, S/O.DEVASSY, NERIANKOTTU HOUSE, VENNALA P.O., PALARIVATTOM. 4. DEVASSY, NERIANKOTTU HOUSE, VENNALA P.O., PALARIVATTOM. R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.K. PUSHPALATHA. ADV. SRI.P.V.ANILKUMAR FOR R4 SRI.E.D.GEORGE FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K. M. JOSEPH & M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ. -------------------------------------------------- W.P(CRL). NO. 39 OF 2010 S --------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd February, 2010 JUDGMENT K.M. Joseph, J. Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus commanding the respondents to produce the body of petitioner's daughter Indu Sathyan before this Court. According to petitioner, she is the mother of Indu Sathyan who is a student of the Government Law College, Ernakulam. It is stated that the petitioner's daughter has some problem and that she has been kept under illegal custody by the third respondent with the active assistance of the fourth respondent. 2. The alleged detenu was produced before us. We interacted with her. We interacted with the petitioner and the father of the alleged detenu. We also interacted with respondents 3 and 4. We had passed an Order dated 01.02.2010. We have perused the Report which is made available. We again asked the alleged detenu. The alleged detenu would submit that WP(CRL). NO.39 OF 2010 S 2 she is aged twentythree and she is not under any illegal detention as alleged. In such circumstances, we do not see any reason why we should permit the petitioner to pursue with the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition fails and it is dismissed. Sd/= K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/= M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE kbk. // True Copy // PS to Judge