IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 676 of 2003 Between: 1 TULSI RAM, S/O.LATE RAM SINGH, H.NO.8-2-293//B2/P/G/1 GYANI ZAIL SINGH NAGAR, NEAR FILM AGAR, SHAIPET MANDAL, HYDERABAD. 2 V.CHINAKKA, W/O SIR SAILOO H.NO.8-2-293//B2/P/14, GYANI ZAIL SINGH NAGAR, NEAR FILM AGAR, SHAIPET MANDAL, HYDERABAD. 3 SUJATA, W/O.SRI YADAIAH, H.NO.8-2-293//B2/P/18, GYANI ZAIL SINGH NAGAR, NEAR FILM AGAR, SHAIPET MANDAL, HYDERABAD. 4 N.SUVARNA, W/O. NAGANNA, H.NO. 8-2-11, GYANI ZAIL SINGH NAGAR, NEAR FILM AGAR, SHAIPET MANDAL, HYDERABAD. 5 G.SHESHAMMA, W/O.KASHAIAH, H.NO.8-2-293//B2/P/16, GYANI ZAIL SINGH NAGAR, NEAR FILM AGAR, SHAIPET MANDAL, HYDERABAD. 7 T.SHASHIKALA, W/O. T.VENKATESH, H.NO.8-2-1/42 GYANI ZAIL SINGH NAGAR, NEAR FILM AGAR, SHAIPET MANDAL, HYDERABAD. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 THE MANDAL REVENU OFFICER, SHAIKPET MANDAL, HYDERABAD. 2 THE REVENUE DIVISILONAL OFFICER, HYDERABAD. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:MR.T.JAGDISH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “In the aforesaid circumstances, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate WRIT, ORDER or DIRECTION, more particularly nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in attempting to interfere with the possession, occupation and enjoyment of their respective pieces of land and the dwelling units constructed thereon duly confirmed under the pattas granted to them and declaring them as bad, illegal, unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A and the principles of natural justice.” Sri T.Jagdish, learned counsel for the petitioners circulated letter, dated 17.06.2008 wherein he has stated that in view of the decision taken by the respondents to allot the slum area to the respective owners, the petitioners intend to withdraw the writ petition. In view of this letter, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn, interim order, dated 10.01.2003 is vacated and WPMP.No.870 of 2003 is dismissed. C.V.NARAGJUNA REDDY, J 20th June, 2008. kvni