INTHE (J'^'".'' l-J.J I'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CQNTEMPT CASE fCIVIL) N0. /< l /2011 B PETCTCONER :Purnima Marketing, Throu9h its Proprieter Ajay Jain, son of Sri Basantilal Ji Jain, aged about 43 years, \\ occupation Business, Address 11 Santha w^--:-is^:^B<lzar-Indore-(M-p-) ^!^^"--'- Dated...." VERSUS RESPONDENT ^C]DMTFMtifOP»v Vishwaranjan aged about 59 years at present workmg os a birector 6eneral of Police, ChhattiS9arh, Police Headquarter, G.E. Road. Raipur (C.&.) CONTEMPT PETmON UNbER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTrTUTION OF INblA REAb WTTH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971 ^_ F STT^T^F f<-li<=h 'STT^fT ^)^ic^ ^f^a Deepti ^^r -^qT^T^PT, ^•d1y^l^ f^<v11'Hll< ^ WW^T^^ISch ar?tw xra^ ^...<^±-^.^^f/l; '^^T' 3TT^r ^^TWHftn sB : Hon'bie Shri iVlanindra Mohel 21-02-2011 Shri Vishnu Koshta, counseil Learned counsel for the petit petitioner, assaiiing the correctne^s Division Bench of this Court in 'VM. 2/8/10, quashing the order with iii pass fresh order deaiing with the cause. Learned counsei for the petit was quashed by this Court, the matter in the iight of observations orders, but iiii date, no orders representation by the petitioner. Though the order dated 3/; fresh order, no time iimit was fixe<ti stage, therefore, i am not inciin^ against the respondent. However, any order within a reasonabie time, his petltion after three months. vvith the aforesaid obser^ati< <=h!^td4l4 ^TFT^ff ^ 'fec^ <^l^l< '^'BTf^R^T^l n Shrivastava. J. |for the petitioner. poner submits that on a petition fiied by the ^s and vaiidity of order dated 3/2/10, the ^.P. (C) No.2771/10, passed an order on [>erty to the Director Generai of Poiice to t'epiy submitted by the petitioner to show loner submits that after order dated 3/2/10 re^pondent ought to have reconsidered the tnade by this Court and pass appropriate have been passed after submission of t/10 was quashed, giving liberty to pass for disposai of petitioners case. At this }d to initiate any contempt proceedings |if the respondent authority does not pass |the petitioner wouid be at iiberty to revive ns, the petition is finaiiy disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge [-qt^ ^fe^ 1;1^\ IP!K?n