IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13944 of 2010 SADHU PASWAN SON OF PACHRATAN PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 1.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the first information report as one of the persons, who was last seen with the deceased and thereafter the petitioner is alleged to have confessed that he was one of the persons, who had played an active role in committing the murder of the deceased. The motive of the occurrence is that the sister of the petitioner was having an affair with the deceased, which was not liked by the petitioner and, therefore, the deceased was murdered. It has further been submitted that there is no eye witness to the occurrence. However, considering the aforementioned circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is made clear that the petitioner’s case shall not be bifurcated for purposes of bail. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )