.innea»*lu^iiaa^j. «'^i:2%. •"^ ""^ i s3ia3SS^XlSiC-22 ..^,.. J .< »;]''ifec""'.'?' iS'-i^ sn^r'^i h-u'^ si^i flb-i-TTch ^lf?^! ~S^i ^WvPf, yfltu'IS. (qCll'M^ 3TI^T W3R _...^$.(^...i.2l.*J *11*ICTI «)*<|ch 200 Iq^T' aii^r TCIRIT •ol??r PETITIONER: Dhruw Ram Sc and Po Dui^{C Versus RESPONDENTS; 1. State oj Forest District Consen Ainbixa Chhattisgarh, tbrough the Secretar}r, pepartiaent, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, |Raipur (CG) jator of Foi^st, Sargiija Circle, pui, District Sarguja (CG) Maaenci fWrit Petition under Articld S.B. HON'BLE SHRJ 3. Divisioilal Forest OfBcer. Forest Division, Jragarh, District Korea (CG) 15-12-2008:- Shri Surul Sahu, counsel Shri Paukaj Shrivasta^ respondents. Heard. The petitioner beiag agg] dated 2-7-2008, whereby his pr^ the deafh of his brother late A| pi^ferred this wnt petition for the case of the petitioner appoiatment i-a tlie light of cii| -<P^4. ^l-Erf^ftn "qp^f "^ 'fec^ <f^^T< ^aiPgiTsn^r [Kumar Soni, S/o late Shri Mahesh jni, aged about 38 years, R/o ViSlage rt Kheda, Block Nawagarh, District t>) 226 ofthe Constitution oflndia) DHIRENDRA MISHRA, J. br the petitioaer. a, Paael Lsawyer for fhe State/ ;g|neved by the order of Aninexure-P/1 ^yer for compassionate appointment for ihwani Kuiaar has been rejected, has d|irection to the respoadents to consider [afresli for providing coiapassionate 'ulat- dated 19-11-2007 of Anaexiire- t^ 3Rati ,^^. %. /'/""" '%. ii 1 6l; i'^E:i^.^^'s-:S:!R 'S, ll 'tste.Jy '"^3y [C-22 sn^r^i h-\\* sn^y ?h*iil=r> «^a 'S^ -^W\v\^, wv[wi'c. fa<ni'Mi< 3^?T xra^? NIMCTI g^qj^-—•——•-—•———•——'g^ y^ "fsre^r' aii^r TOiiWHfl? §t- aD It is not ia dispute that th< died on 12-9-98. The petitioner on fhe groiuid fhat the deceasejl death and, fherefore, ffae petitioi the faBxBy was entitled for has been filed on fhe grouiid processed his appUcation for coi ofciccular ofAnxiexiire-P/4 datej that where Goverrunent einploi leaving no spouse or other dep| einployee are also entitled for consent of fhe pareuts of such rejected vide Annexure-P/ 1 wifh 11-2007 is not wifh retrospective| It is setfled law that put| descent Appoiatment on coni^ favour of ttie children or other whiie readermig senrice. ;iven onty for nieenng the niun^f faduly by reason of fhe dea^ appointment is naade on coinp) confined only to the purpose it provide for endless coinpassion. In view of the above, I am <|>: rejection of prayer for conipassi{: coinpi^ssionate °tinl<n<ill IIICT ^ ftTA <r«l(^l< ^SlPgTI 311^1 4 petitiouer's brother Ashwanl Kuniar i^plied for coinpassionate appointraent was uruaarried at tlie tmie of his ^er beiag tlie only eligible meinber in. appointment. This petition Ithat fhe aufhorities ought to have i)ipassk>nate appointraent nu the Hght jl 19-11-2007 which clearly raentions tee died while reinaiaed uniuarried 'ndents, brofher and sisfer of such [oinpassionate appoia.tment with fhe ^iuployee. However, prayer has been faa observation fhat circuiar dated 19- •ffect. |lic einployment caruiot be given on |assionate grouud is an exception ia |relatives of the einployees, who died on coinpassionate ground is diate hardship which is 'faced by the h of fhe bread eanier. When 011 issionate ground, it should be kept leeks to achieve. fhe idea beiag not to Appoi^jtinent f fhe opinion that reason assjgned for inate appointment is just and proper f^ lilaS^8t 2J-HC-22 \ •!,.. ^/ ff ^,. '*?•°<<»'' '"s^.-S.^^' TS? •<iwid<!<, »fll+i<is, ftffli'My 3TI^?T XRra? *<1*ICTI a)t<iqi""'""'""""""""'""""'"""W^ 200 'f^ST" sn^r^i Wi'^ ssSsv ^•i-f ^lf^ff Barve 3)i^[ TOTRIT'gfw -z. no direction for graat of pefcttioner can be issued by tlus C wifhout any substance is liabkj disinissed. iiiiici-fli ii*iCTi'^'fttzt <r<!iyi< ^? sipOT sii^r 'oinpassionate appbintinent to fhe [ourt. Aceordingly, the petition beiug to be dismissed and it is faereby Sd/- UhirendraMisbra 1ip"°^°"Judge \ ^'^r'1, ^aa^