IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.35929 of 2008 RUPESH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.09.2008 Heard. The FIR was lodged under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code against unknown criminals with regard to an occurrence of robbery, wherein articles of the informant and others were looted by the criminals while they were returning from market. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Further submission is that the petitioner’s complicity is alleged only on the ground that his name transpired in the confessional statement of co- accused Rabish, Rudal, Manish and Siddhu, who named the petitioner as one of their associates in the commission of the offence. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 12.04.2008, but there has not been any recovery from the possession of the petitioner nor he has been put on any TIP. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the - 2 - petitioner, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge-F.T.C-I, Begusarai in connection with Sessions Trial No. 578/08 arising out of Teghra P.S. Case No. 51 of 2008. Kundan (C. M. Prasad, J.)