IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26074 of 2010 BIRJU SAHNI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ---------- 04/ 11.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. Case no.150/2009 registered under sections 392, 411 of the IPC and 25(I-B), 26 of the Arms Act. Although the petitioner is named in the FIR but admittedly, nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession nor he was caught at the spot. The name of this petitioner has come in this case only on the basis that the miscreants were uttering the name of Birju Sahni who snatched the bag from the informant. The trial court has reported that charge has already been framed against this petitioner but up till now not a single prosecution witness has been examined. Although the petitioner carries criminal antecedent but considering the submissions of the parties, petitioner (Birju Sahni) is directed to be released on bail in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. Case no. 150 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai subjects to the condition that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner and furthermore, the petitioner shall attend the learned trial court on each and every date in person and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without having any valid reason, the learned trial Judge shall be at liberty to - 2 - cancel the bail bond of petitioner. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)