THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.25870 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner appeared in a written test conducted by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (for short ‘the Corporation’) in the year 1996 for appointment to the post of Sub Staff (Peon). The appointment, however, could not be made, since several complications have arisen. It is only in the recent past, that the Supreme Court had given a quietus to the matter. The Corporation has decided to conduct interviews for the candidates who are successful in the written test, conducted in the year 1996. The petitioner was also issued a call letter. He challenges the action of the Corporation in subjecting him to interview, on the ground that he has already been interviewed in the year 1998, and the Corporation is under obligation to declare the results thereof. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation. This writ petition is not maintainable for more reasons than one: Firstly, the petitioner approached this Court by filing W.P.No.23431 of 2011 with a prayer to direct the Corporation to fix another date of interview for him, on the ground that he received a call letter belatedly. The writ petition was dismissed on 24-08-2011. The second writ petition in relation to the same appointment does not lie. The contentions, which he has advanced in this case, could have been raised in the earlier writ petition itself. Secondly, the Hon’ble Supreme Court categorically directed that interviews be held for the candidates, who are successful in the written test, conducted in the year 1996. Nowhere in the order passed by the Supreme Court it is mentioned that the interviews that were held, if at all, in the year 1996, or thereafter, must be taken into account. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.19-09-2011. KO