IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.R.BANNURMATH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER THURSDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2009 / 30TH ASWINA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 745 of 2009(S) ---------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.2574/2005 Dated 10/07/2008 .................... PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS 1,9 & 10 IN THE WA -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. V.D.SHIBU, S/O. V.K.DASAPPAN, AGED 44, LALITHA BHAVAN, KALAVAMKODAM P.O., CHERTHALA-688 536. (TYRE RETREADER GR-II, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REGIONAL WORKSHOP, ALUVA-683 106). 2. K.Y.MOOSA, S/O. K.M.YUSUF, AGED 38, KUZHIYILAKATHOOTTU VEEDU, THAIKATTUKARA, ALUVA-683 106. (TYRE RETREADER GR-II, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REGIONAL WORKSHOP, ALUVA-683 106). 3. K.K.BABU, S/O. K.K.KESAVAN, AGED 46, KIZHAKKEPURAYIL, PERUMTHURUTH P.O., KALLARA, KOTTAYAM-686 611. (TYRE RETREADER GR-II, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REGIONAL WORKSHOP, ALUVA-683 106). BY ADV. SRI.B.RAGUNATHAN SRI.V.V.MATHEW SRI.R.SRINATH RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT IN THE WA ---------------------------------------------------------------- SHRI. T.P.SENKUMAR, (NAME OF FATHER AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS), MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023. BY ADV. SHRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN, SC, KSRTC THIS CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.R. Bannurmath, C.J. & A.K. Basheer, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Contempt Case (Civil) No. 745 OF 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2009 JUDGMENT Basheer, J. When this Contempt Case is taken up for consideration today, it is brought to our notice that in compliance with the direction contained in the judgment all the dues have been paid to the petitioners. 2. However, learned counsel submits that in the matter of regularisation, the Government has held against the petitioners. He submits that liberty may be reserved in favour of the petitioners to impugn the said decision in appropriate other proceedings. In the above facts and circumstances the Contempt Case is closed with liberty to the petitioners to pursue the remedy available to them as against the order refusing to grant regularisation. S.R. Bannurmath, Chief Justice. A.K. Basheer, Judge. ttb WA No. -:2:-