A%«. HWIH IIHHHHHIIIIIHIIIII 00062049 \ $i¥i5ign gendm {Crmimi T} N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR,M.?. CRIMINAL APPEAL No. (£61 /1999 AFELLANT j ai l ) Santoshibai w/o Devnamian Kaushik, aged about 23 years, r/0 village Bun§ela.'P.$. Chakarbhata. Distt. Bilaspur, M’L’P¢ —Versus- RE?ONDENT State of M.P. through P;S. Chakarbhate Distt. Bilaspur . M.P,. C PEAA UNDER SECTION 374 (2) OF THE CrP.C. r. M . I P (g S * XI—HC-22 DB: HON’BLE SHRI A,S.V. MOOR HON’BLE SHRI L.C. BHAD 03/08/2004, Ms. J.A. Khan, counsel— f Shn‘ Ravindra Agmwal, P The accused Santoshi . against th€ judgment passed‘ accused Santoshi Bai again tile: Vijay and that has been numberl as unneccssary. However, Mq sentence and grant of bail filed healing in Criminal Appeal No.2: A copy of this order No.2860/99. Sdl— ‘ ' chief Justice z X r the appellant. e1 Lawyer for the respondent] State. ai Eed Criminal Appeal No.867]99 in S.T.No.5934/97. Subsequently, l another appeal alL’hg with accused :d as Ciiminal Appeal No.2860/ 99. In thc circumstances, Crilhinal Appeal No.867/99 is dismissed riP.No. 1989/ 2004 for suspension of in this case shall be taken up for i60/99. be retained in Criminal Appeal Sd/— x L.C. BHADOO i Judge & O