IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.91 of 2009 LAL BABU RAI S/O KAMAL RAI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BANJARIA, P.S. KATHAIYA, DIST.- MUZAFFARPUR ………PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MUZAFFARPUR 3. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, MUZAFFARPUR (WEST) POLICE STATION, MUZAFFARPUR 4. THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, KATHAIYA POLICE STATION, KATHAIYA 5. THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CIVIL COURT, MUZAFFARPUR 6. THE REGISTRAR, CIVIL COURT, MUZAFFARPUR 7. THE S.D.J.M.(WEST), MUZAFFARPUR 8. MATUK SINGH S/O LATE DEEPAM SINGH @ DEEP NARAIN SINGH, RESIDENT OF BANJARIA, P.S. KATHAIYA, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR …….RESPONDENTS. ----------- 3. 11.02.2009 It is the assertion of the petitioner that respondent no.8 is an accused in Kathaiya P.S.case No.3 of 1993 and though a permanent warrant of arrest has been issued against him by order dated 10.7.1998 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (West), Muzaffarpur in Trial No.215 of 1998, but he is not being apprehended. Having heard Mr. Karn for the petitioner, A.C. to A.A.G.VII for the State and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the petitioner shall be well advised to approach respondent no.2, the Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur for the redressal of his grievance. Needless to state that in case petitioner approaches respondent no.2, he shall take appropriate action in accordance with law without unnecessary delay. Application stands disposed off with the observation aforesaid. Narendra/ (Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, ACJ.)