IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1212 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: March 01, 2011 Anand Sethi .. Petitioner Vs. Ram Lal .. Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Surajmal Kundu, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N. Jindal, J (Oral) This petition assails the order dated 30.11.2010 (Annexure P1) passed by the Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Panipat, whereby the evidence of the petitioner was closed by order. The petitioner wants to examine two material witnesses namely S.P. Sharma who had attested the agreement being Notary and Sonu, who had witnessed the agreement. Besides, the petitioner also wants to prove on record the assessment register from the municipal record as well as the legal notice issued by the counsel. In the given circumstances of the case, it would be expedient in the interest of justice to provide more opportunity to conclude his evidence. Consequently, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to close his entire evidence within three months from today and the trial court is directed to facilitate the service upon the witnesses if are required to be summoned by the petitioner, subject to payment of `5000/- as costs. This petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondent with a view to impart complete justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondent as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter. Still, if dissatisfied, the respondent may move to this court for recalling this order. March 01, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge