IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1413 of 2008 RATNANSHU THAKUR son of Late Upendra Thakur, resident of Village Raghunathpur, P.S. Sahebpur Kamal, District Begusarai, at present working to the post of Lab. Incharge in the Department of Psychology, D.B.K.N. Colege, Narhan. Versus 1. SRI ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, Secretary-cum- Commissioner, Department of Human Resources Development (Higher Education), Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. Dr. Mishari Lal Thakur, Vice-Chancellor, Lalit Narain Mithila University, Darbbhanga. 3. The State of Bihar. with MJC No.1414 of 2008 KRISHNA KUMAR JHA, son of Late Shibchandra Jha, resident of Village Bara, P.S. Khodabandpur, District Begusarai. At present working to the post of Lab. Incharge, in the department of Botany, D.B.K.N. College, Narhan. Versus 1. SRI ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, Secretary-cum- Commissioner, Department of Human Resources Development (Higher Education), Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. Dr. Mishari Lal Thakur, Vice-Chancellor, Lalit Narain Mithila University, Darbbhanga. 3. The State of Bihar. with MJC No.2053 of 2008 RATNAKAR MISHRA, son of Sri Ram Narain Mishra, resident of Village Narhan, P.S. Bibhutipur, District Samsatipur. At present working to the post of Lab. Incharge, in the Department of Chemistry, D.B.K.N. College, Narhan. Versus 1. SRI ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, Secretary-cum- Commissioner, Department of Human Resources Development (Higher Education), Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. Dr. Mishari Lal Thakur, Vice-Chancellor, Lalit Narain Mithila University, Darbbhanga. ----------- 11. 17.3.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the opposite party-University as also the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners had filed a joint representation pursuant to the order of this 2 Court stating their claims, which have not been considered. Learned counsel for the opposite party-University submits that no such representation was filed by the petitioners and as such, the question of violation of the order of this Court does not arise. However, the learned counsel for the University submits that in case the petitioners represent their claims separately within three weeks, the same would be examined and the admissible payment shall be made expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation. All these contempt applications, accordingly, stand disposed of. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)