~1%^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (227) No. 6968 of2008 Planitifi'. Naakidau @ Tejram S/o Bailia, adopted son, aged :abput 65 years, R/o village Gejainuda, Tahsil and District Raigarh (CG). VERSUS 1. Ramesh Kumai- S/o Gajanand, aged about 40 yeare, 2. Dev Kumar S/o Gajanaiid, aged about 35 years, Both R/o village Kusmura, Tahsil and District Raigarh (CG). 3. Laxmi Bai W/o Vasudev, R/o village Hardi, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (CG). 4. State of Chhattisgarh, through District Colleetor, Raigarh. 5. Kaushalya Bai W7o Ganeshlal, aged about 70 years, R/o Dhangaon, Tahsi and District Raigarh (CG). 6. Krishna Prasad S/o Sardha, aged about 60 years 7. Meghnath, S/o Sardha, aged about 62 years. 8. Bodhiram S/o Kanwaldliar, aged about 45 years. 9. Radfaa W/o Kanhaiya, aged about 60 years. lO.Moharmati W/o Ramesh, aged about 46 years. 11. Laxmi S/o Kanhai, aged about 40 years. 12. Ramkunwar Wd/o Kanhai, aged about 75 years All from 6 to 12 are R/o village Gejamuda, Tahsil and District Raigarh (CG). CWRIT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTLTUTION OF JNDIA) (SB: Hon'fale Mr. Sattsh K. Agnihotri. J.V PlaintiffNo.3 PiamtiffNo.4 PlaiirtiffNo.5 F-1aintiffNo. 6 PlamtififNo. ^ Present Shri A.K. Athaley, Ad.vocate forthe petitioner. Shri A.S. KacUhwaha, Deputy Advocate General forthe State. ORAL ORDER (Psssed on 15 day ofDeceanber, 2008) 1. Withthe consent of'the parties, the matter is taken up for hearing fiiially. lil-il Sahy 2. Leamed couasel appeariag for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 23.09.2008 (Armexure P/l), passed by the IIud Civil Judge, Class-II, Raigarh, whereby the application of the petitioner for calling records in support ofadoption deed, has been rejected. 3. The leamed Judge has rejected the application on fiie ground fhat it is not necessary to file other materials in support ofthe photo-copy ofthe adoption deed. The petitioaer could have obtained the certified copy from fhe Board of Revenue and couid have produced the same before the Civil Judge, Class II, Raigarh, forproper adjuc^ication. 4. I do not fmd any intimiity, itTegularity or illegality in the order. The. order passed by the IInd Civil Judge, Class II, Raigarh, is just and proper, and needs no mterterence. 5. The petition is accordingly dismissed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to make aii application before the Boai-d of Revenue to obtain certified copy of the adoption deed, in accordance with law. No order asto eosls. 6. Cofisequently, pending applications, ifany, also stands disposed of. tlS^^- ^1:^^ Ml S^-j^ •-.-J;^^;^^^=~?&?"?S?"?