IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.19907 of 2010 SRIKANT SINHA, Son of Lat Saryu Singh, resident of Court Area, Ghoshi Road, Jehanabad ,by the side of East Lane of District Judge Residence, Jehanabad, P.O., P.S & District-Jehanabad --------------------- Petitioner Versus 1. MAGADH UNIVERSITY through its Registrar, at Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya 3. The Pro Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya 4. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya 5. The Principal, S.S. College, Jehanabad, P.S. & District- Jehanabad 6. The State of Bihar through its Secretary, Human Resources Department ( Higher Education), Govt. of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna ------------------ Respondents. ----------- 02 09-12-2010 Heard Shri Dronacharya, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. The petitioner, who retired as Demonstrator with effect from 31.1.2010 from S.S. College, Jehanabad, has made a prayer to direct the respondents, particularly respondent no.2, i.e. the Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya to make payment of entire retiral dues. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that despite the fact that several months have elapsed from the date of retirement, till date payment has not been made. It has further been submitted that the petitioner has filed representation before the authority of the University, but till date no action has been taken. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being 2 disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 i.e. the Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, Respondent no.2 is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate order, so that entire retiral dues of the petitioner may be settled within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. In case of rejection of the claim of the petitioner, Respondent No.2 is directed to pass a speaking order. With the above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)