1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1506 OF 2010 Shri. Rahul Vithal Admane. ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent. Mr. A.M.Shete for the Applicant. Mrs. M.H.Mhatre, APP. For the State. CORAM : R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 23rd April, 2010 PC : 1 This is an application for grant of regular bail. The applicant is shown as an accused in C.R.No.193/2008 registered by City Police Station, Pandharpur for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 302, 141, 144, 148, 159, 109, 201, 120B of the IPC and Section 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. The deceased is one Hiralal. The incident took place on 3.12.2008 between 9.15 to 9.30p.m. Police have recorded the statement of Nagnath Lala Pawar who is an eye witness to the crime who has 2 specifically mentioned the names of the present applicant and other accused persons who have killed the deceased by sickle. One unknown person fired at the deceased from the fire arm. A glance of the police record indicates that this is an extremely brutal murder and the eye witness named the applicant. Advocate for the applicant claims parity with co-accused Prashant. But on perusal of the order passed by this court, it is seen that he was granted bail because he was not named by Nagnath and he was linked on the basis of the statement of the co accused. Other accused are also granted bail by this court as they have not named by Nagnath. It is seen that other eye witnesses did not name the accused because they were not knowing the applicant. In such circumstances, not a fit case for grant of bail. Hence, application is rejected. It is made clear that the observations made in this order will not be used against the applicant at the time of trial. 3 Parties to act on a copy of this order duly authenticated by the registry of this court. ( R.S. MOHITE, J.)