d^ \s^^ /^- .IB^^. 1 G IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.t WRIT PETITION fS) N0. ? ^ OF 2010 PETITIONER Vijay Narayan Tiwari Son of Shri K. L. Tiwari, aged about 47 years, Resident of Harrapadav, Block Colony Keshkal, District Bastar (C.G.). VERSUS RESPONDENTS : ^ ^^ ^"..••••^o-"" ^^ )fy ^y ^'^ ...- :^>/ ^' ^.fts^. ^^-"""<%Y l^ ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Department, Raipur (C.G.). 3. Zila Panchayat Bastar, through its Chief Executive Officer, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). 4. Janpad Panchayat Keshkal, through its Chief Executive Officer, Keshkal, District Bastar (C.G.). 5. Anand G. Singh, at present working as C.E.O. Janpad Panchayat Keshkal, Djstrict Bastar (C.G.). 6. Mansukh Lal Bhurat, at present Vice Chairman, Janpad Panchayat Keshkal, District Bastar (C.G.), 1 through Chief Executive Officer, JanpadPanchayat Keshkal. WRITPETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA v HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH AT BILA8PUR WRIT PETITION fS) No. 75 of2010 PETITIONER : Vijay NarayanTiwari. VER8U8 RE8PONDENT8 : State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARI1CLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUnON OF INDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. AffnUiotri. J. Present: Shri P.S.Koshy, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORALQRDER (Passed on 02nd day of Febmary, 2010) I.A. No.2, fhis is an application for taking additional documeiit on record. The application is ordered as prayed fbr. 1. Leamed Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State/respondents 1 & 2, referring to the letter dated 11.01.2010 (Document C) submits fhat because of imposition of the code of conduct due to Panchayat elections, the charge of Chief Executive Qfficer, Janpad Panchayat, Geedam, could not be handed over to the petitioner. However, aiter Ae election is over, the charge shall be handed over immediately to the petitioner. 2. In view of tiie above submission, accordmg to leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner, nofhing survives for adjudication in fhis petition at this stage. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of Ainit Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotn Judge