1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 120 OF 2003 Shrinivas Anant Ghanekar ....Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents Mr. R.S. Apte with Mr. A.A. Garge for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Rao for respondent No.2. Mr.R.M. Agarwal for respondent Nos. 5 and 6. CORAM:DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J., & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE: JULY 28, 2004. P.C.: In this petition, the petitioner has prayed that respondent Nos.5 and 6 were not entitled to allotment of flats as their income was more than Rs.40,000/­ per annum. The learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that departmental inquiry has already been concluded by which they have already been given punishment. The amount already deposited by them has been forfeited and the flats allotted to them have already been 2 cancelled. We feel that respondents Nos. 5 and 6 have adequately been punished for their lapse. No further directions are necessary in this petition. Petition is accordingly disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.