SSM 1 55.cas.300.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 300 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST.) NO. 8715 OF 2009 Premsukh Biharilal Mantri and others .... Applicants Versus Krishi Utpanna Bazar Samiti ....Respondent _____ Mr. Vipin Kasale i/b M/s. Ram & Co. for the Applicants. Mr. Pankaj Deokar for the Respondent. CORAM: RAJESH. G. KETKAR, J. DATED : MARCH 4, 2011. P.C.: This is an application for condonation of delay of 207 days in filing Second Appeal. 2. Heard Mr. Vipin Kasale, learned Counsel for the Applicants and Mr. Pankaj Deokar, learned Counsel for the Respondent. For the reasons set out in the application, I am satisfied that the applicant has made out sufficient cause for condoning the delay. SSM 2 55.cas.300.11 3. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). No order as to costs. (RAJESH. G. KETKAR, J.)