IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 23RD JUNE 2011 / 2ND ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 16854 of 2011(F) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. PRAYAG P.RAMESH, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.P.RAMESH, PRATHANA HOUSE, PATHIYARAKKARA P.O., VATAKARA VIA, KOZHIKODE, PIN 673 502. 2. SUMESH MOHAN, S/O.M.MOHAN, AGED 23 YEARS MOORIPARAYIL HOUSE, ANTHINAD P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 651. BY ADV. SRI.P.M.HABEEB RESPONDENTS --------------- 1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY P.O., THENNJIPALAM, KOZHIKODE, PIN 673 635. 2. THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY P.O., THENNJIPALAM, KOZHIKODE, PIN 673 635. 3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY P.O., THENNJIPALAM, KOZHIKODE, PIN 673 635. BY ADV. MR. SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 16854 of 2011(F) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION OF THE FIRST PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION DATED 13.06.2011 EXT.P2 : TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT REMITTING THE REQUISITE F EE FOR REVALUATION BY THE FIRST PETITIONER DATED 13.06.2011 EXT.P3 : TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SECOND PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION DATED 13.06.2011 EXT.P4 : TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT REMITTING THE REQUISITE FEE FOR REVALUATION BY THE SECOND PETITIONER DATED 13.06.2011 /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. .............................................................................. W.P.(C) No.16854 OF 2011 ......................................................................... Dated this the 23rd June , 2011 J U D G M E N T The prayer of the petitioners is to direct the respondents to publish the revaluation result of the papers of 4th Semester of B.Pharm Course, as requested in Exts.P1 and P3, within a time frame. 2. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents as well, who submits that a minimum time of 'eight' weeks is necessary to have the revaluation result published in respect of the papers concerned. 3. After hearing both the sides, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and finalise Exts. P1 and P3 applications preferred by the petitioners for revaluation of the relevant papers and publish the result, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 'eight' weeks, provided the applications are in order in all other respects. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE. lk