1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.4546 of 2008. Ganesh S/o Govindrao Borkar. V. The Collector, Nagpur and others. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances,Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri M. V. Mohokar, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram: B. H. Marlapalle and A. H. JOSHI, JJ. Dated: 18th OCTOBER 2008. 1. Just because the petitioner's name has been recommended by the Collector for being absorbed does not mean that he has a vested right for being appointed by Respondent no.2 & 3. There is nothing on record before us that Respondents no.2 & 3 have undertaken the recruitment process for any post or they have sent any requisition to the Employment Exchange inviting the applications for appointment. Unless it is pointed out that the Respondents no.2 & 3 have started recruitment drive or some posts exists with them, and the recruitment process has started for the same, the petitioners prayer cannot be considered. 2 2. Hence, the petition is rejected as being premature. JUDGE JUDGE Sbm