IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cr. M. P. NO. x 2011 $ingie Bench APPLICATION FOR UNDER SECTION 439 (fifOF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FOR CANCELLATION OF BAIL APPLICANT Ram Sajivan S/o Jethu Ram aged about 25 years R/o Village Pandi Post Baba Mohtara Tahsil Bemetara Distt. Durg (C.G.) VCI‘SuS RESPONDENT Arun Kumar Vaisnav S/o Chandu Das Vaisnav aged about 55 occupation Agriculturist R/ o Village Navagaon Thana 8r, Thasil Bemetara Distt. Durg (C.G.) B‘A. No: Crime No. Police Station Offence U/ s g/ V 139/2011 69/2006v’/ Bemetar‘gjDistt. Durg (C.G.) 420, 409, 468, 467, 471 81, 34 of I.P.C. 5/1/2006 Challan has been/filed and Criminal case No. 166/2007 is pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bemetara Distt. Durg (C.G.) 1)/ Date of incident Status State of Chhattisgarh through Police Station Bemetara, Distt. Durg (C.G .) 69 m zoo wwma,m,fww LKWP Ig‘I/Q WW mm(1{af3a§a) I mmm , WW§wW WWW aamqanéw Hon’ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra J. 14.10.201 1 Shri Punit Ruparel, counsel for the applicant. Shri Avinash K. Misha PL for the State/respondent No.2. This is an applicatien for cancellation of bail granted i0 respondent No.1 Arun Kumar Vaisnav in a case inikoiving offence under Section 420, 409, 468, 467, 471 and 34 ofIPC. Allegation is that the Sarpanch and Panchayat ’Secretaiy of Gram Panchayat Navagaon fabricated the cheque by mentioning one. additional zen) in the cheque and making the figure 18,000f— as‘ 1,80,000/— they withdrew the said amount. Arun Kumar is the jeth of Sarpanch Vijay LaXIni, who is absconding. Learned counsel submits that the co-accused Anil Kumar was granted bail under Section 43 of Cr.P.C. after about 8 months of incarceration, however, res ndent No.1 was granted bail immediately after his arrest d therefore his bail deserves to be _ ' cancelled. After hearing learned cou sel for the applicant, this court does inot find any such ground to ent rtain the application for cancellation of bail. / i i mm C& PM £n...u: A 94/" E1200 W wax:m ()