1N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDECATURE.AT - BELA$PUR(C.G:) amp-LNGLEBLIE 01: 2003 D TWE PETITICNER pRADEEP 1mm Dam NGAN AGED .. 42 YEARs___ SON OF SHRI SN». DEwANGAN posmn As _ SUBJNGINEER A T - 13mm MINISTER FROJECT IWLIMENT UNIT,PRADHAN MANTBI GRAM SADAK YOJANA, DHAMTARI R/o KOSHTAPARA,AZAD m-IoaiK, DHAM’MRI (c.e.) VERSUS ”RIT PSTITIGV LNDER— ARTICLE— 226 9F uQVSTITUTICN OF 'INDIA FOR ISSW‘NCE OF RIT IN THE NATURE OF JvIMDAifUS PROFiIBITTm,SUITA%LE DIRECTICN OR DIRECTIGVS, ORDE GR ODERS . / / REspmDmm : 1. 5mm OF cu mu vGARH THROUGI’I .. THE sncahmaY HUgiAL DEWLGPMEM a} JMENT -" “/3 \ D z! ,s BMW RAIpUt: 2. 1H: QEVELGPWEJT comrssm %%g(;w : L; ' ‘HHITISGARH, r A RAIpUR. wuwxgg. a“ \V" " f 3. EXECUHVE ENGINEER CUM MEMBER sECRETARY OI: pmME MIMSTER pROJECT IWLIMENT LN;T,pRADHAN MNTR: GEAM SADAK YQJANA, DHNKMRI (C.G ) XX-HC~22 0&1229533 Shn‘ RS. Patel, counse1 for t Shri Raubir Singh, Govt. Ad Heard. The petitioner has prefexred of the Constitution of India chalk (Almexure Pal) passed by'ths I ‘ Sub—11116. (la) of Rule 9 of MP. Ciw Appaal) Ruhs 1966. Under Sub—11116 [3} of Ru (Classiflca’rion, Control 8t. Appeal) file an appeal against the order c therefere, equally efficacieus remm the petifioner has not availed of pe'ti’fion does not lie and it i$ dism‘ “~sLm},. ssed. Consequently, NLWP. N03 he petitioner. I. for the State. this writ petition under Ariicle 226 :nging the orcier-dated 15.09.2003 )evelopmeut Commiesioner under l Services (Classiflcation, Control & .e 23 of the MP. Civil Services RuleS 1966 there is a provision to f suspension made under Rule 9: 1y is available to the petitioner but the same. Accordingly, this Wilt 2f 2003 also stands disposed of. Sd/— L.C.BHADOO 7 ‘1 Judge [new