WP 1513/11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1513 OF 2011 ( Santosh Laxmanrao Jadhav Vs. The Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad & Ors. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. N.L. Jadhav, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.V. Kurundkar, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate for respondent No. 4. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 1st March, 2011. PER COURT : 1. Heard finally. It is apparent that the petitioner Sarpanch was not given opportunity to participate in the discussion in meeting conducted on 2.12.2010. 2. In view of this position, after some debate, Advocate Thombre for all respondents who are opposing the petitioner states that if this Court is inclined to admit the matter, respondent find it convenient to hold fresh meeting. 3. In view of the statement made, the proceedings recorded on 2.12.2010 are quashed and set aside. Respondents who moved motion for no confidence are permitted to hold fresh meeting. 4. The respondent Nos. 2 and 3 shall convene fresh meeting for the said purpose by 24th March 2011 at time convenient them. Notice of that meeting shall be served on all parties in accordance with law by WP 1513/11 2 respondent Nos. 2 and 3. 5. Accordingly petition is allowed in part. No costs. 6. Authenticated copy of this order be supplied to the requesting parties. [ B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. ] ssc/wp1513.11