IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 17TH DECEMBER 2010 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 37538 of 2010(N) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- K. MANIKKI AMMAL, W/O. THEYYANDA THARAKAN, KALAMULLI HOUSE, VELLINEZHI AMSOM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH, SRI.V.C.MADHAVANKUTTY. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD -1. 2. TALUK LAND BOARD, OTTAPALAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OTTAPALAM.P.O - 679 101. 3. TALUK TAHSILDAR, OTTAPALAM TALUK, OTTAPALAM - 679 101. 4. VILLAGE OFFICER, VELLINESHI VILLAGE, VELLINEZHI.P.O - 679 504, OTTAPALAM TALUK. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/12/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P (C) No. 37538 of 2010 -------------------------- Dated this the 17th December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Ext.P1 is an application made by the petitioner under Section 85 (8) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, which is stated to be pending before the 2nd respondent. 2. In the meantime petitioner apprehends that the land mentioned therein will be taken over from her. It is with this grievance, the writ petition is filed. 3. Taking note of the case of the petitioner in regard to the pendency of Ext.P1, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider the same with notice to the parties concerned and pass an order thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. 4. It is directed that status quo as on date shall be maintained in the meanwhile. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before respondents 2 and 3 for compliance. Writ petition is disposed. ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE ma