-^ HIGMCOURZQF.JUDJCATURECHiiAJJiSGAR.Hj.MLASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ APPUCANTS/ PLAINTIFFS v RESPONDENTS M,C,C,51pf20Q6 1. Sunder Devi, Wd/o Late Ram Bharos, aged about 66 years. 2. Raghubir, S/o Late Ram Bharos, aged about 50 years. 3. Balvir, S/o Late Ram Bharos, aged about 48 years. 4. Jagdish Singh, S/ S/o Late Ram Bharos, aged about 50 years. 5. Satish Singh, S/o Late Ram Bharos, aged about 35 years. 6. Rajesh Singh, S/o Late Ram Bharos, aged about 30 years. (All R/o Link Road, Bilaspur, TehsJI & District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 1. Janki Bai, Wd/o Late Harnam Singh Sengar, aged about 65 years. 2. Raj Kumari, D/o Late Harnam Singh Sengar, aged about 40 years. 3. Hemlata D/o Late Harnam Singh Sengar, aged about 38 years. 4. Prabha, D/o Late Harnam Singh Sengar. aged about 36 years. 5. Rekha, D/o Late Harnam Singh Sengar, aged about 34 years. (All R/o Godpara, Bilaspur, Tehsil and District - Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 6. Raghuraj Singh Sengar, S/o Late Harnam Singh Sengar, aged about 42 years, R/o Near Arya Samaj Mandir, Gondpara, Bilaspur (CG) 7. Ramu Agrawal, S/o Makhan Agrawal, aged about 45 years, Pro. Bilaspur ^ A^ ^ Y"-. .-^^ ^Hl^ '"~\.^ <m 8. Motor Tractor and Motor parts, Masanganj, Bilaspur, Tehsil & Distt. Bilaspur (CG) Vth AdditionalDJstrict Judge, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Present: Shri H.S. Ruprah, Sr. Advocate with Shri Ranbir Singh, learned counsel for the applicante. Shri Manindra Shrivastava, learned Sr. Advocate with Shri Amrito Das, iearned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1,2, 3,5 and 6. ORALORDER [Passedon 2isfJuTy, 2006) Heard. 1 do not find any ground whatsoever to review the order dated 09-01-2006 passed in W.P. No. 106/2003. Hence, M.C.C. No. 51/2006 isdismissed. Nocosts. 1 Sd/- Chief Justice