1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.5774/2006 (Tej Ram & Anr. vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : December 19, 2006 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.M.K.Garg, for the petitioners. Mr.Vishal Raj Mehta, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned as well as the challan papers. The allegation of assaulting the deceased is against her husband. So far as petitioner No.2 is concerned, the allegation against her is that she used to object not working of the deceased and so far as petitioner No.1 is concerned, the allegation against him is that at one point of time, he used abusive language to the deceased. There is no allegation against either of the petitioners causing any injury to the deceased. Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. 2 Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and the petitioners Tej Ram s/o Munshi Ram and Smt. Raksha Devi w/o Tej Ram be released on bail in FIR No.470/2006, P.S. Anupgarh, Distt. Sriganganagar provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his/her appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/