IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31829 of 2011 Binay Singh, Son of late Mahanand Singh, R/o village-Makhdumpur, Digha, P.S.-Digha, District-Patna. ……….Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ………Opp. Party. ----------- 2 19.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case in which cognizance for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken. It is stated that at best the case would be a dispute of civil nature. No ingredient of offence under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code is made out. The complainant alleges to have entered into an agreement with one Lalita Rai and paid certain amount to her for purchase of a piece of plot. The allegation is that Lalita Rai in spite of receiving the amount has not executed the sale deed. The petitioner is alleged to be the person who introduced the complainant to said Lalita Rai and also became a witness to the agreement for sale. The agreement was entered into in 2007 and the present complaint has been instituted in 2010. Taking into consideration the nature of allegation, let the petitioner, namely Binay Singh in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand only) with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 2111 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. Sanjeet (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)