1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4890/2009 Rakesh Parihar & ors. vs State of Raj. & Anr. DATE OF ORDER: 15.5.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. Pramendra Bohra, for the petitioner. <><><> Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner was appointed vide order dated 28th Dec., 2001 as Junior Engineer. The petitioner earlier approached before this Court by filing writ petition being SBCWP No.3659/2000 wherein the petitioner was permitted to submit the representation and in consequence thereof, the respondent passed the order Annex.1. According to the petitioner, the petitioner is in service and his case for service benefits have not been considered and decided by the respondents. It is submitted that in the identical facts and circumstances, one of the employee Rameshwar lal Mathur submitted writ petition being SBCWP No.5124/2005 wherein this Court directed the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner afresh. 2 Following the decision of this Court dated 30.8.2005 passed in SBCWP No.5124/2005 it is directed that the petitioner may submit his representation, which may be considered by the respondents strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation of the petitioner and certified copy of this order, which may be placed by the petitioner before the competent authority. It is also ordered that if petitioner found entitled for any relief in accordance with law only then the same may be given to the petitioner and if it is found that he is not entitled to any relief sought then a reasoned speaking order strictly in accordance with law may be passed. The writ petition of the petitioner is disposed of with above directions. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. c.p.goyal/-