THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH CONTEMPAT CASE NO:357 OF 2011 DATE:30.08.2011 BETWEEN B.CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY …PETITIONER AND SRI SRINIVAS & OTHERS …RESPONDENTS. THIS COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH CONTEMPAT CASE NO:357 OF 2011 ORDER: The present contempt case is filed by the petitioner seeking to punish the respondents under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act for non implementation of the order of this Court dated 31.12.2010 passed in W.P.No:16224 of 2010. The writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not paying the compensation amount to him for the value of the timber standing the patta lands in S.No:24, 88 and 89 of Neredigonda village, S.No:21 of Kupti-K village and S.No:49, 34, 17/2, 22/2 of Rolmamda village, Adilabad District which were cut down by the respondents under widening of the National High Way No:7 Road even though the 4th respondent sent the proposals by proceedings No:B/291/2006, dated 340.9.2008 for payment of the amount after considering the joint inspection report submitted by the Revenue and Forest Officials as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, to direct the respondents to pay the compensation amount to him for the value of the timber lost in the widening of the N.H.No:7 road as quantified by the 4th respondent proceedings, dated 30.9.2008. By order dated 31.12.2010, this Court passed the following interim order: “No counter is filed by respondents. Respondents are directed to take necessary action for payment of compensation as mentioned in the letter No:B/291/2006 dated 30.9.2008 addressed by the R.D.O to the District Collector within four Weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Post after vacation” In this regard, the 1st respondent filed the counter narrating the facts and circumstances in order to show that the petitioner is not entitled for any compensation. It is also stated that seeking to vacate the order passed by this Court, the respondents have filed W.V.M.P.No:766 of 2011. At this stage, it is submitted by the learned G.P appearing for the respondents that when the said vacate stay petition is listed for hearing, the said petition was adjourned at the instance of the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and therefore, there are no such circumstances to infer disobedience on the part of the respondents. In view of the fact that the vacate stay petition has been filed by the respondents and the same has been adjourned at the instance of the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and in view of the contentions raised in the counter filed by the 1st respondent, there cannot be any ground to infer any willful disobedience on the part of the respondents. Accordingly, this contempt case is closed. No costs. _________________ Justice G.Chandraiah. Gurc. Date:30.8.2011 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH CONTEMPAT CASE NO:357 of 2011 DATE:30.08.2011