IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -- Crl. Misc. No. M 19555 of 2009. Date of decision: December 02 , 2009 Sheela Devi @ Jagiro ........ petitioner Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent (s) Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur -.- Present: Mr. Prijat Gaur, Advocate for Mr. S S Gill, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. K S Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest? Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (oral) It is informed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner has since been convicted and the present petition has, therefore, become infructuous. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the present petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as having become infructuous. (Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge December 02 , 2009 mohan