IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No.8363 of 2010 Date of decision: 24.12.2010 ` R.K. Sankhyan ….Petitioner Vs. Dr. Y.S. Parmar University & anr …Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B. Misra, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surinder Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?3 For the Petitioner: Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. The Writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: 1. Directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and grant him reasonable time to vacate the premises under his occupation by granting extension to vacate the premises on or before 31st July, 2011, by which time, the house under construction will be ready. 2. Annexure P-7, i.e. order dated 14.12.2010 issued by respondent No.2 may kindly be ordered to be quashed. The writ petition is being disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1 that the representation, already submitted by the petitioner, be considered within six weeks from today by hearing the petitioner or his authorized legal representative, on the presentation of the copy of the certified copy of this order along with supporting 3 Whether reporter of local papers are allowed to see the judgment ? documents, and shall dispose of the representation sympathetically in view of the contents narrated in para 6 of the writ petition, within the time specified, by a speaking order. Till then, petitioner shall not be disturbed from the possession of the said premises allotted to him. However, it is clarified that the petitioner has to pay the rent and other charges as permissible under the rules. In view of the disposal of the writ petition, all the pending application(s) are disposed of. Copy Dasti. ( R.B. Misra ), J. ( Surinder Singh ) J. 24th December, 2010, (sl)