1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.229 OF 2006. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's Order appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr.R.R.Salvi with V.S.Deokar and L.N.Bedekar, for Petitioner. Mr.C.R.Sonawane, AGP for Respondents. CORAM: V.G.Palshikar, J., & V.R.Kingaonkar, J. DATED: 1st March,2006.. P.C.:- By this petition, the petitioner is challenging the communication issued to it on 14.12.2005. All that has been done by this communication is that doubt is expressed regarding lifting of unauthorised grants by the petitioner- school. The contention is that this communication is wrong, and the 2 grants received by the petitioner school were sanctioned by the Education Officer himself and therefore, there is no question of lifting unauthorised grants. If this is a simple explanation, it can also be given to the concerned Education officer. The very fact that the petitioner is not willing to go to the Education Officer and has filed this petition for quashing the communication, it enormously speaks volume. Since the remedy of approaching the Education officer is available to the petitioner, no interference is called for. Hence, the petition is rejected. The petitioner to approach the Education Officer as early as possible and he should decide the matter in a month thereafter. 3 (V.G.Palshikar, J.) (V.R.Kingaonkar, J.)