15.wp 3337-10.doc RMA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 3377 OF 2010 Mahesh K. Nare .. Petitioner Vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors .. Respondents Mr. Ganesh Gole for the Petitioner Mr. A.S. Gadkar, APP for the State CORAM : P.V. HARDAS & N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 7th MARCH, 2011. P.C.: 1. The learned Counsel for the parties state that in the light of the order of discharge which has been passed by the learned trial Court, an appropriate remedy to the petitioner would be filing of the Revision. Unfortunately, the petitioner had filed Revision which came to be withdrawn on account of pendency of this petition. Since the appropriate remedy would be filing of Criminal Revision Application, we grant liberty to the petitioner to file Criminal Revision Application afresh. In the event, a question of condonation of delay arises, period of pendency of this petition may be taken into consideration by the Court while considering the question of limitation. We accordingly dismiss this petition and grant liberty to the petitioner to file 1 15.wp 3337-10.doc appropriate proceedings including Criminal Revision Application in respect of the said prayers after the decision in the Criminal Revision Application. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J ] [ P.V. HARDAS, J ] 2 15.wp 3337-10.doc 3