IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR FRIDAY, THE 26TH AUGUST 2011 / 4TH BHADRA 1933 WP(C).No. 23264 of 2011(G) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- PAUL P.GEORGE,JANATHA HOME TECH, KODATHIPPADI,MANNARKKAD,PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON SRI.MAHESH V.MENON RESPONDENT(S): ----------------------- 1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, MANNARKKAD. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,ERNAKULAM. 3. INSPECTING ASST.COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,PALAKKAD. BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: tss W.P.(C) NO.23264/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1:- COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2002-03 DTD. 18.12.2009. P1(a):- COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2003-04 DTD. 18.12.2009. P1(b):- COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2004-05 DTD. 18.12.2009. P2:- COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P2(a):- COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P2(b):- COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P3:- COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P3(a):- COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT . P3(b):- COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P4:- COPY OF THE EARLY HEARING PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P4(a):- COPY OF THE EARLY HEARING PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P4(b):- COPY OF THE EARLY HEARING PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P5:- COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P5(a):- COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P5(b):- COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT . P6:- COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD. 7.3.2011. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL:- TRUE COPY P.S. TO JUDGE tss T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 23264 of 2011-G - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 26th day of August, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner is aggrieved by the assessment of tax by Exts.P1 to P1(b) orders. Already the petitioner has approached the second respondent by filing Exts.P2 to P2(b) appeals. Exts.P3 to P3(b) are the petitions for condonation of delay, Exts.P4 to P4(b) are the applications for early hearing of the appeals and Exts.P5 to P5(b) are copies of stay petitions. 2. Aggrieved by the proceedings for recovery of tax, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. There will be a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the stay petitions, viz. Exts.P5 to P5(b), within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Simultaneously, the delay condonation applications will also be disposed of. Till the disposal of the stay petitions, the recovery proceedings will be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/