1 caw-2252-09 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLN.NO. 2252 OF 2009 IN W.P. NO. 4350 OF 2009 Madan Dnyanoba Maske ..Applicant Vs. The Registrar, Shivaji University Kolhapur Vidya Nagar, Kolhaupr and Ors. ..Respondents .... Mr.S.D.Patil Adv. for Applicant Mr.A.B.Borkar Adv.for Respondent-University. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 14, 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant-original complainant. 2. The complainant had filed Complaint (ULP) No.26 of 1995 before IInd Judge of the Labour Court at Solapur. The said complaint came to be partly allowed by order dated 10th October, 2005 and the Respondents were directed to re-employ the complainant as a fresh employee on top priority basis as a Laboratory Assistant in its establishments within a 2 caw-2252-09 period of one month from the date of order. The Respondent-University filed Revision which came to be dismissed. Hence, they filed Writ Petition No. 4350 of 2009 before this Court. Respondent-University also prayed for ad-interim stay in the said petition. This Court by order dated 8th July, 2009 in W.P. No.4350 of 2009 observed that no case was made out for grant of any ad-interim relief and it was directed that the orders of the Courts below be implemented within four weeks from the date of the order. 3. The applicant has preferred the present application stating therein that the Respondent-University has failed to comply with the order dated 8th July, 2009 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 4350 of 2009. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that Respondent-University has not complied with the order dated 8th July, 2009, hence, this Civil Application has been preferred for dismissal of the Writ Petition No. 4350 of 2009. Thus, the applicant is seeking summary dismissal of Writ Petition No. 4350 of 2009 on the ground that order dated 8th July, 2009 passed by this Court in the said writ petition, has not been complied with by the Respondent-University. 4. The learned counsel for the Respondent-University has submitted that being aggrieved by the order dated 8th July, 2009 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 4350 of 2009, the Respondent-University has preferred Letters Patent Appeal No.31 of 2009 before the Division 3 caw-2252-09 Bench of this Court and the Division Bench has stayed the impugned order. In view of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court, no fault can be found with the Respondent-University for not complying with the impugned order. Hence, at present, no case is made out for dismissal of the Writ Petition No. 4350 of 2009. However, if the Letters Patent Appeal is decided in favour of the applicant, liberty is granted to the applicant to prefer a fresh application. 5. Application is disposed of. [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]