^-^-^ ? /"& IN THE HIGH COURT OF ^HHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (^fNO.3^'r~OF 2009 ^ PETITIONER Chetan Kumar Mahilane, S/o Sri Mahadeo Mahilane, aged about ^ SSyears, Occupation - Service, presently posted as Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Rengle, Block Bagicha, District Jashpur (Chhattigsarh) .«_ VERSU S RESPONDENTS (-" :ec"33. ^^.sy0^ ^CB6;- G"- Ad<oc-""EilsS? .^^oR^ State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe Development, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2. Comraissioner,Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe Development,Chhattisgarh, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3. Collector (Tribal Welfare), Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) 4.' Assistant Commissioner, Scheduled Caste/ScheduledS' Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) 5. Block Education Officer Block Bagicha, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS: ^^ ^ /7' *n*tCR Sfe^R^ •41"i"!--i. ®Tli+l"'s.l'-!M 'IP' .,LA3.,:P..Cs)...2>3'76............ atre^Ttrswf •^:r;l7" :?~ i-;-f?'*: ! "qi ?i^F, ikiil*' ! -^" w;nwT^{?»s- 'wifenRrttnaf-4 few ^fSR^n ^-affimsn^i RAr. Justits Pi'itinter Di'A'sk Shri Ashish Shrivastav; Ms. Sunita Jain PL for •ths counsei for the petitioner. respondents/State. At the out set counseijfor the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw this petition with i|berty make a dstaiied i'epresentation to respondent No.1 raising ail ^ order impugned. He submi| probiems, it wouid be difficuit therefore he prays for a direcl |he grie'/ance of the petitioner against ihe [s that as the petitioner has numerous ror him to carry out the order impugned and ion to rsspondent No.1 for eariy disposal of &hti£; fjS"t'"i^'Ka?nf''S^!n&^ f^t? fh& EAi2.Ai'H(n!inS?' T'ft th-EC riQi'^SEAS;* ;n? ^h^Si /^i'^E'n's:&! ff^y lf'H& )<^{Jt t?S^iEi.SL;t.E^'*EE yi E.Ute ptelt^Uttyi'. iU t.E tESf S&;^|U^->SL yi iii^ ^•«JLit'i.^^i E'^'i i.U1.? petitioner, State counsei has r^o objection. Accordingly, the petitloh is dismissed as wlthdrawn wlth iiberty as aforesald. In cass of reprfesentation being fiied by the petitioner, respondent No.1 is expected to decide the same within a period of three •weeks from the date of its receipt, in accordance wiijijaw———— Sd/- pritinker Diwaker Judge