^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W. P. (St No. 5'\CV6 OF 2010. PETITIONERS M/nj l/ : 1. Smt. Prabha MiniJ aged about 38 years, W/o. Shri Swaran lal Ekka, Head Master, Middle School Stationpara, (Kuinagar), District Surguja (C.G.) 2.?"^Immaculate Lucy Toppo, aged ^ae-6^^ fl7<fr'yif^&. - T/"t-(£t} about 46 years, W/o. Shri Anthres Toppo, Head Master, Middle School Kamalpur, Camp Surguja, District Surguja (C. G.; -f.KK's•; VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C. G. ^^ye^\ '^ry-. ^ %:-^ f^y e**"'f ''^' \ ''%; <9> Sf 7^? ^. 2. Assistant Comn'iissioner, Tribal Welfare Deparfaiient, Surguja, District Surguja (C.G.) 3. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account and Pension Surguja, Distt. Surguja (C. G.) y- '^ WRITPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 7 -HC—78 311^1 ^RI ftfW 'tian sn^r'g^w >.\-—r ^~: ~S:sf -^ww^, anlyis, fqwiyy ^^:lfel..F?.^1^.t.^ HWWI (hHlcb•-••••••—j-"—^ 200 an^?[ 'v^v ('ipfgq^tf) 'RBIWHfttT 311^1 SB : Hon'bie Shri Manindra Mohai Shri Somkant Verma, counse] Shri V. V. S. Murthy, Deput^ Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State/res); Heard. Learned oounsel appearing petitioner is entjtled to benefit of tw| he having passed B.Ed. examinatic|n cost. It is submitted that the issue longer res integra and the same ha{ Supreme Court in the case of Ash^ 200B (!!!) MPJR (SC) 59. [t is furth| taken a similar view in his ot W.P.(S.)No. 6257 of 2008. Learned (jc attention of this Court to order No.124 of 2009, v/herein,retying in the case ofAsha Saxena (supr another Writ Appeal No.87/2009,1 consideFation of the case for gran) cireular dated 21-09-1974 issued bt verification ofthe facts pteaded in th^ Learned counse! for the re) petitioner would also be considered dat^d upcjn a) |and q)H^4il *llH<rff'^ ^yt ^re^rt '^3tfW3n^!?T Shrivastava. J. for the petitioners. Advocate Generat with Ms. Sunita ondents on advance copy, |for the petitioners submits that the b advance increments on account of before his appointment at his own nvolved in the present petition is no been finally decided by the Hon'ble Saxena vs. State of M.P. & Ors., ar submitted that this Court has also der dated 06-02-2009 passed in sunse! for the petitioner further draws 29-04-2010 passed in Writ Appeal the judgment of the Supreme Court the order passed by this Court in directions have been issued for of two advance increments as per the State of Madhya Pradesh, after petition. . • ipondents submits that case of the bn the same 'ines. -f- 731 "4l'4l<rt'4, ®ii1y<is,f°<yi'yy,< W«tlflrHlctl_.'^.l:..^...^....i'.^^. 1»L3 •WI, 200 sn^i^^; (1pf3^t) 3^1w K.4* W^TT afn^9T a»*i Tumgne Twiw^risasn^i -L- 'n view of the statement ifiade above, this petition is finatiy disposed of with a direction to the re, decide the claim of the petitioner fof .•tpe[i,oireular ,ctatsd-21-09-1974 issue ".aSeFwenfigaffo'rr'tif the facts pleaded weeks" from"f6cTay. +l<|[d<il-1 'WWff tf 'f?lzt <f«lt{l< ^aifipTan^CT spondent authorities to consider ana grant of tvw advance increments as •d by the State of Madhva Pradesri. in the petition within a period of eight Sd/- : 3, Manindra Mohan Shrivastavat Judge 1U.