IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 4528 of 2011 Date of decision: 15.06.2011 Ashok Singh. ...Petitioner. Versus. State of H.P. and others. ...Respondents. Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph,C.J. The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K. Sharma,J. ________________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.K. Bawa, AG with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. AG and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy. AG, for respondents No. 1 to 5. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-2, in particular the endorsement whereby he has been directed to handover the complete charge of Sahoo Beat to the sixth respondent. According to the petitioner, it is in violation of the norms. It is further submitted that no arrangement has been made as to where the petitioner should work. The petitioner may point out all these aspects before the third respondent by way of an appropriate representation within a week from today, in which case the third respondent will look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law and justice within another two weeks. The present arrangement of working of the petitioner and sixth respondent will continue till orders are passed as above. It will also be open to the petitioner to point out the vacancies available either for accommodating the petitioner or the sixth respondent. ...2... 2. The writ petition is disposed of so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph) Chief Justice (Justice V.K. Sharma) Judge 15th June, 2011 (jai/virender)