( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12805 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6237 OF 2008 Sayad Hidayat Ali s/o Syed Lal Jagirdar APPLICANT VERSUS Syed Abdul Haq s/o Noruddin Jagirdar & others RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 618 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6237 OF 2008 Syed Khaja s/o Syed Asadullah Jagirdar and others APPLICANTS VERSUS Syed Abdul Haq s/o Syed Nooruddin and others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. M.S. Choudhari, advocate for the applicants in above two applications. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8754 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6237 OF 2008 Sayad Khaja Sayad Asadullah Jagirdar and others APPLICANTS VERSUS ( 2 ) Syed Abdul Haq s/o Noruddin Jagirdar & others RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. M.S. Choudhari, advocate holding for Mr. Y.M. Khan, advocate for the applicants. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 18th January, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr. Choudhari. None appears for the other side. 2. The application for intervention (C.A. No. 12805/2009) is submitted on the ground that property of the applicants was illegally alienated and they have been dispossessed during course of execution of the compromise decree. Considering the nature of allegations, intervention application is allowed. 4. Though the applicants in C.A. No. 8754/2009 will not be added as intervenors and their request for intervention is rejected, yet, advocate for the applicants would be at liberty to address as regards ( 3 ) grievances of the applicants. 4. The other reliefs regarding recalling of the orders (vide C.A. No. 618/2010) will be simultaneously considered at the time of final hearing of the writ petition. The applicant is at liberty to move for early hearing of the petition. 5. All the three civil applications are accordingly disposed of. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/ca618-2010