0/ff- ls^^- Be'RSh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fS.) N0. •2>56£ /2009 PETITIONERS: 1) ^ .*" ^' .^\r v^ ^4 2) <^1' <^;,^ ^••^> <? ^^ .•<" .^-^ s/ ^^ Shyam Kumar Patel Assistant Teacher, S/o Shri Ramlal patel, Aged about 40 years, Govemment Primary School Jhanakpur, Block Baramkela, District-Raigarh (C.G.) Gendalal patel Assistant Teacher S/o Shri Chandra Shekhar Patel Aged about 44 years, Government Primaiy School Saraipali, Block Baramkela, District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, School Educatonal Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. The District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. The Block Education Officer, Block Baramkela, Distt Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC. l!);"]l 1":' —78 w ^rraTOT, eitil^'i'a, fstciiyy ......U.?:..C.s.:)....^£.fc/ sn^'?T'li'R? stWiqafeN »*3n^tanw WnWHfeian^i SB : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICB PRI'UINKBR DIWAKBR 30.07.2009 Shri D.R.Patel, counsel for th^ petitiorrers. Shri Arrind Dubey, P.L. for th( Counsel for the petitioners ^ubnaits that his case is squarely covered with the number of deci^ions passed by this Coiirt on 6.2.2009 vide Annexure P/5. He submits that he may be F|ermitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file representjation before respondent No.2. He further submits that direction irjay be issued for deciding his representation expeditiously. Counsel for the State has no ^ibjection if the petitioner makes a representation and the sanae is concemed in accordance with law. stage, he cannot make any stateme4t to the effect that the case of the petitioners is identical to the cases the petitioner would be decided aft^r scrutinizing all the docuinents and material which will be produced| by the petitioners. Accordingly, the petition is 41smissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. In the e^entuality of filing any such representation by the petitioner wi^hin a period of one raonth faom the date of receipt of the copy of tl^is order, the same is expected to be decided by the competent auljhority in accordance with law, considering the facts and circumsta^ices of the case, preferably within a period of three months from the d4te of its receipt. ^>f^4t'1 ^fW^ff ^ i^^ {.T^^K ^?'aifgq an^i State. t^eing decided by the authority |le however, submits that at this already deeided and the case of It is niade clear that this Coi.jrt has not expressed any opinion on merits and the authority woi^ld be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordanccj with law. _ _ _ _ Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge