IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND APRIL 2008 / 13TH CHAITHRA 1930 WA.No. 717 of 2008 -------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.21322/2007 Dated 21/08/2007 .................... APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------- BABY, KOITHARA VEEDU, MARUTHOORKULANGARA SOUTH, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.KARTHIKEYA PANICKER SMT.DAYA K. PANICKER RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: --------------------------------------------- 1. THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY THE ASSISTANT DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, KARUNAGAPPALLY. 2. THE ASSISTANT DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, KARUNAGAPPALLY. 3. V.S. JALAJAKUMAR, SHYLAJA MANDIRAM, THOTTUMMUGHAM P.O., MYNAGAPPALLY, KARUNAGAPPALLY. BY SC - TDB ADV. SRI. K.N. VENUGOPALA PANICKER. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L. DATTU, C.J. & K.M. JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WRIT APPEAL No. 717 of 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 2nd day of April, 2008. JUDGMENT H.L.DATTU, CJ, The order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 21322 of 2007 dated 21st of August, 2007 is the subject matter of this writ appeal. 2. The learned Single Judge has rejected the writ petition. 3. Petitioner claims that he is in possession of Shop Room No.6 in Block No.10 of the Shopping Complex of the first respondent Devaswom Board. According to him, the shop had been allotted by the Board to the third respondent. It is his further case that the third respondent in turn has allotted the shop to the petitioner. Therefore, in the writ petition, the petitioner requests this court to direct respondents 1 and 2 to execute a lease deed in favour of the petitioner in respect of shop bearing No.6 in Block No.10 of Shopping Complex of the Devaswom Board. 4. In our opinion, the learned Single Judge has rightly rejected the writ petition. We do not see any infirmity in the orders passed by the learned Single Judge. Therefore, interference with the said order is not called for. Accordingly, while confirming the order passed by the learned Single Judge, we reject the writ appeal. Rejection of the writ appeal will not come in the way of the appellant/petitioner approaching the Devaswom Board for appropriate reliefs. Ordered accordingly. H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE sb.