erv1ce atter 1N E I CHHATTISGARH A ILASPUR (CHHATTISGAR } 1 ‘ WRIT PETIT N S ’ NO; v29 years wormg a o1a Govt Ashra o alua ock Baglcha, lstnc ashur CLhatUsar I 2 Smt angeeta Bal, auter o awan Ram age aou 5 ear erkm as Coo hram Bl Bha, aged about S dgh f Md d bt 2 ys, wg k Govt. s School Rangpur ock aglc mur atsar ommssoner, Tra elar . , 2. Cii ibl Wfe f S B (S M) TH HONBLE HGH \ ' ‘F T B H) E‘ ‘y z l k s Chwkdr m Schol Gbd Dt Jp: gh : / ,1- DK.S.Bhaw , Rp, Chhugh. / ‘\ x \ ) y I I¢§§w~§§ ‘ $7 a XI-HC—7 8 ‘ :u a K t y? ‘ %$§‘g \ w“ WW mm (Wu) Wiglm6W°PmNi 200 WWW » wwémm mmm $1WW WW $31TW3TI€§I [SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Malian Shrivastava, J.[ 29.6.2011 l\ Harish Khuntiya, counsel for the respective petitioners. Shri Vinay Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State. petitioners submits that the Learned counsel for the issue relating to claim of contractual payment to Cook and other employees came up for consideration before this Court batch of petitions and after petitioners, this Court had directed consideration of the case in those cases. He submits that the case of the petitioner; are covered by the aforesaid order. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State of the petitioners would be in w.P. (S) No.2oo4/11 and examining the claim of the submité that the representation decided after due verification. After going through the in w.P. (S) No.2004/11, it is petitioners are squarely covered by the aforesaid order. also entitled to the same Therefore, the petitioners are direction in the case. Accordingly, it is directed that if the petitioners make \ fresh representation before the Concerned authority; claiming l Shri C.J.0K. Rao along with Shri iiAkshay Yadav and Shri )rder dated 15.4.2011 passed apparent that the case of the XIHC 78 I Wm ...................................................m 299 mwm mm: . I ‘ mmogiawa) , , mmm I .‘7/rv— mmw:ww: ; $WWW payment of ‘ mlmmum Wagesappucame to a contract employee under {he Chhattis garh Ciivil Service (Contract ules, 2004, the same slhall be disposed of in W, Within a period o:f eight weeks from the r ‘ Vn of represeintationi In the event of any adverse o _ er, the petitioners Vivould be at liberty to flle writ petition afresh. ' With the' aforesaid direction, the petition is finally disposed of. ‘ . ‘ ‘ sci/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastavar Judge i ‘ Tumane