IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-30859 of 2009 Date of Decision:12.1.2010 Vidhawa Ram .... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present: Mr. Tribhawan Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Pannu, D.A.G. Punjab. **** 1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. It is not denied that the recovery so effected from the petitioner is 5 k.g. of Poppy husk, which is non commercial in quantity. Learned State counsel on instructions from HC Gurcharan Singh states that the petitioner has since joined the investigation. In view of the same, order dated 4.11.2009 is made absolute and the petition is allowed accordingly. 12.1.2010 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE