1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.36 OF 2009 IN CHAMBER ORDER NO.1367 OF 2008 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.12 OF 1995 IN KANPUR SUIT NO.71 OF 1992 M/s. Super Tannery (India) Ltd. ..Plaintiff. Vs. M/s. Ramesh Chandra & Co. ..Defendant. .... Mr. A.K. Saxena for the Plaintiff. Mr. Ajay Khera i/b M.S. Bodhanwalla & Co. for the Defendant. .... CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 18th August, 2009. P.C. : An order has been passed by the Commissioner for taking accounts removing the Execution Application from the board under Rule 498 of the High Court (Original Side) Rules. Rule 499 provides that when a reference or matter is removed from the file of the Commissioner it shall not be restored to his file without an order of the Court or the Judge in 2 Chambers. A consequential order was passed by the Additional Registrar refusing to extend the returnable date of the warrant of sale. In the interests of justice, it would be appropriate to grant relief that has been sought in the Chamber Summons. The Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c). *****