IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.R. No. 675 of 2008. Date of Decision: 20th May, 2008. Baldev Singh ....Petitioner through Mr. Arun Singla, Advocate Versus Davinder Kumar ...Respondent through Mr. V.K.Sandhir, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SURYA KANT,J.(ORAL) This revision petition is directed against the order dated 24.12.2007 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Talwandi Sabo whereby leave to defend the suit has been granted to the petitioner – defendant subject to his furnishing bank guarantee to the extent of 50% of the pronote amount. The petitioner is aggrieved at the condition of requiring him to furnish bank guarantee. While issuing notice of motion vide order dated 4.2.2008, this Court had directed the petitioner to furnish adequate security along with surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, however, without prejudice to the respondent's rights. Learned counsel for the parties have been heard. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that adequate security along with surety bonds has already been furnished to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court which is comprising of ownership rights qua immovable property of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent has taken a fair stand that in the light of the security of immovable property furnished by the petitioner, there is no necessity of asking him to furnish bank guarantee provided the petitioner does not alienate the said immovable property and/or does not create any sort of encumbrance on the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that the immovable property which is the subject matter of security shall neither be alienated nor any type of encumbrance shall be created thereon and an affidavit to this effect shall be filed by the petitioner before the learned trial Court within two weeks. Revision petition is disposed of in the above noticed terms. May 20, 2008. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE