THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25587 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner submitted an application in response to a notification, dated 20.10.2006, for appointment to the post of Contract Junior Lineman. He was not selected. This writ petition is filed with a prayer to consider his case in accordance with Clause 6 (iv) (c) of the said notification. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. A batch of writ petitions came to be filed challenging the selections that were made in pursuance of the notification. The writ petitions were allowed and Clause 6 (iv) (c) of the notification was held to be illegal and untenable. The matters were carried in writ appeal and the observations made in the order in the writ petitions that Clause 6 (iv) (c) is untenable were upheld. Certain directions were issued on other aspects and the matter is assumed finality. Therefore, the question of directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with Clause 6 (iv) (c) of the notification does not arise. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:08.10.2010. kdl