IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No 619 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- PARESH BABULAL CONTRACTOR (KADIA) Versus NAINABEN PARESHKUMAR -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR PJ KANABAR for the Petitioner. MR MS JAYSWAL for the Respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR Date of decision: 08/03/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr.Kanabar, learned Advocate for the petitioner, submitted that the parties have settled their dispute inter se and, therefore, this Civil Revision Application has become infructuous. In view of the said statement of the learned Advocate, this CRA is disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged. Interim relief stands vacated. No costs. 8th March, 2004 ( P.B. Majmudar, J. ) *** (apj)