THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4506 of 2009 ORDER: The respondent filed O.S.No.366 of 2007 against the petitioner in the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Eluru at West Godavari, for the relief of perpetual injunction. The petitioner filed I.A.No.2271 of 2007 under Order XXVI Rule 9 C.P.C. with a prayer to appoint a Commissioner to inspect the suit schedule property and other places mentioned in the written statement and to note the physical features. The said application was opposed by the respondent. Through its order dated 20.01.2009, the trial Court dismissed the I.A. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition. The principal question that arises for determination in the suit filed by the respondent is as to who, among the parties, is in possession of the suit schedule property as on the date of filing of the suit. Burden to prove his possession squarely rests upon the respondent. In a way, the petitioner need not even prove his possession. The scope of adjudication in suits of this nature is very limited and repeatedly this Court held that appointment of Commissioners, that too at the instance of the defendants, in suits for injunction is impermissible. The trial Court took the correct view of the matter and this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order under revision. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. ________________________ (L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J) 23rd September, 2009 GHN