IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 24TH OCTOBER 2011 / 2ND KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 28237 of 2011(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- THRESSIAMMA, W/O.LATE CHACKO,AGED 61,MATHILAKATHU HOUSE, KADAYANIKKADU P.O.,VELLAVOOR VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERY,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.R.MURALEEKRISHNAN SMT.T.M.RESHMY RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN 686 001 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHANGANASSERY POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN 686 101 3. AKHIL G.NAIR, S/O.GOPINATHAN NAIR, PRAYAGA(CHATTUKAKKULATHU), VALLAVOOR VILLAGE,CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN 686 101 4. ARAVIND G.NAIR, S/O.GOPINATHAN NAIR, PRAYAGA(CHATTUKAKKULATHU),VALLAVOOR VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERY,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN 686 101 5. PRASANNAKUMARI @ PRASANNA G.NAIR, W/O.GOPINATHAN NAIR,PRAYAGA(CHATTUKAKKULATHU), VALLAVOOR VILLAGE,CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN 686 101 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.DINESH MATHEW MAJOORAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC NO.28237/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE INJUNCTION ORDER IN I.A. NO.760/2011 IN O.S. NO.122/2011 OF MUNSIFF COURT, CHANGANASSERY. EXT.P2: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 13/10/2011 SUBMITTED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 28237 OF 2011 ------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of October, 2011 JUDGMENT Pius C.Kuriakose, J. The petitioner has approached this court seeking protection for her life from respondents 3 to 5. It is stated that the petitioner is having civil dispute over certain items of property with those respondents and that dispute is already before the Civil Court. According to the petitioner, protection for the property, if necessary, will be sought for from the Civil Court. But, there is threat to the life and limbs of the petitioner from the party respondents. The complaint of the petitioner is that though Exts.P2 complaint was submitted to the first respondent - Superintendent of Police, no action is taken so far. 2. We are of the view that in the nature of the limited relief, which is being given to the petitioner, this writ petition can be disposed of even without notice to the respondents. Hence, we dispose of this writ petition with the following directions; WPC.No.28237/2011 2 3. The first respondent will take up Ext.P2 immediately. Necessary enquiries will be conducted into Ext.P2 either by the first respondent directly or through any of its Subordinate Officers other than the 2nd respondent. If the enquiry reveals that there is truth in the petitioner's allegation that there exists threat to her life and limbs from respondents 3 to 5, the officer conducting the enquiry will ensure by taking appropriate steps that the life and limbs of the petitioner are safe. As regards the property, we make it clear that it is for the petitioner to move the competent Civil Court for appropriate relief. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE C.K.ABDUL REHIM,JUDGE. dpk