1 Cri-A-5458-10-&-Ors.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Mhi CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5458 OF 2010 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5459 OF 2010 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5460 OF 2010 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5461 OF 2010 Shri Sunil Satiram Yadav ... Applicant/accused Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.Prashant Malik,Advocate, for the applicant. Ms. P.P. Shinde, APP,for the respondent - State. Smt. R.V.Newton, APP, for the Respondent-State (in Appln.No.5461/10) CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE : 3rd February, 2011. P.C. 1. The applicant in all these four applications is an accused of theft in Crime No.261/2010, 264/2010, 274/2010 and 276/2010. The Sessions Court had granted bail to him on his executing P.R. of Rs.10,000/- with a local surety in the like amount in each case. As the applicant happens to be from U.P., he could not furnish local surety. Therefore, on his application Nos. 4440/10, 4441/10, 4442/10 and 4443/10, the condition of furnishing the local surety was relaxed by this Court as per the order dated 25.10.2010. According to the learned Counsel for the applicant, he could not find surety worth Rs.10,000/- each and therefore still he is 2 Cri-A-5458-10-&-Ors.sxw in custody. He points out that six more cases were registered by the police in which he has already furnished bail. Therefore, he makes a prayer that the amount of surety may be reduced. 2. In view of the facts and circumstances in each of the above four cases, the applicant - Sunil Yadav be relaxed on his executing P.R. of Rs.5,000/- with a surety in the like amount with condition that he shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence and shall attend the police station on everyday between 7 p.m. and 8 p.m. till the framing of charge and thereafter on every Sunday between 10 a.m. and 1 p.m. (J.H.BHATIA,J.)