:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE CONTEMPT PETITION NO.28 OF 200 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.28 OF 200 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.28 OF 2008 Komal Mohankumar Rayana ...Petitioner. v. Mohan Kumar Rayana ...Respondent. Mr.Anand Singh i/by M/s.M.P.Vashi & Associates , adv. for the Petitioner. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. J.H.BHATIA,J. DATE: 30th January, 2008. DATE: 30th January, 2008. DATE: 30th January, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. 2. The petitioner is the respondent in Petition No.A-274 of 2006 and she is wife of the respondent, who had filed that petition. In that petition on an application Exhibit 9 filed by the wife, the learned Judge of the Family Court had directed the respondent/husband to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.1 lakh per month to the wife for herself and minor daughter from the date of application, i.e., from 27th July, 2006. The said order was challenged before the High Court in writ petition filed by the husband and the maintenance amount was reduced to Rs.60,000/- per month. The petitioner has filed contempt petition on the ground that the respondent has not made payment of maintenance. :2: 3. Order of the maintenance is executable under Section 18 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 just as a decree or order under the Civil Procedure Code. In these circumstances, I do not see any reason to take action for contempt of the Court. 4. Contempt Petition stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.) (J.H.BHATIA,J.)