IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1903 of 2011 DHARMVEER SINGH @ FEKUA & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3 13.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the state. Petitioners are not named in the FIR and in course of investigation, two witnesses have named the petitioners. At paragraph-15 of the case diary, one witness, namely Raj Kumar has stated that the deceased was forcibly taken away by petitioners. Even if the statement of this witness assumed to be true, then also he has not seen the actual killing of the deceased. At paragraph-16 of the case diary, one witness, namely, Sushil Singh has claimed to have seen the alleged occurrence and he has stated that he went near the place of occurrence and tried to intervene into the altercation but he was threatened by the petitioners. Apart from the aforesaid witness, neither the informant nor any other person has stated about the involvement of the petitioners in the alleged crime. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances well as submission of the parties, let the petitioners, namely, Dharmveer Singh @ Fekua and Dharmendra Singh be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Begusarai Mufassil P.S. Case - 2 - No. 223 of 2009 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)