IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP (T) No. 9091 of 2008 Decided on: 6.1.2011 Khem Chand ……….Petitioner. Versus H.R.T.C. ...….Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner. : Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. January 6, 2011. (Rajiv Sharma) (hl) Judge 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.