IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No.1001 of 2008 Smt.Ram Pyari Devi ……….. Petitioner Versus Sri Gulab and others ………. Respondents ……………… Sri Gajendra Tripathi Advocate holding brief for Ms.Mamta Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the respondents. Date: May 08, 2009 Hon’ble B.S.Verma,J. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking mandamus directing the Additional Civil Judge II (Senior Division), Dehradun to decide the ad interim injunction application (paper No.6C2) as expeditiously as possible. 2. The plaintiff/petitioner instituted original suit bearing no. 544 of 2007 before the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun seeking permanent injunction against the defendants/respondents alleging that she is the owner of the property in question by virtue of two registered sale deeds dated 06.07.2007 and 16.07.2007 and the defendants are trying to interfere in her possession by raising construction over the said property. It is also alleged by the petitioner that the trial court invited objection on the ad interim injunction application (paper No.6C2) and fixed 10.01.2008 for disposal of the said application. Thereafter the defendants were allowed frequent adjournments on several dates and the ad interim application of the petitioner is pending for disposal. Due to non-disposal of ad interim injunction application, the petitioner is suffering hardship. 2 3. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of finally with the direction to the trial court to decide the ad interim application (paper No.6C2) moved by the plaintiff/petitioner in Original Suit No. 544 of 2007, Smt.Pyari Devi versus Gulab Singh and others, preferably within a period of three months, if it has not been decided earlier, from the date of production of certified copy of this order. (B.S. Verma, J.) 08.05.2009 P.Singh