IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23838 of 2009 KANHAI SAH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 03.08.2009 Heard both sides. Sole petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 414, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 472 of the Penal Code. As per allegation in the F.I.R., the petitioner was found in possession of a vehicle which had no proper documents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this vehicle was purchased by him for a consideration amount and the documents of registration/ ownership were duly produced before the Investigating officer as well as the authority. It is further contended that till date nobody has come up to say that this vehicle is stolen one. Learned counsel for the petitioner referring to annexure-2, submits that the present case is the result of the action taken by him against the informant for his lawful dues in respect of the vehicle in question. It is further contended that the issue was raised with the higher officials as well. It is further highlighted that the petitioner is an elected ‘mukhiya’ and is respectable person of the locality. In the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail 2 bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M. Rohtas in connection with Rohtas P.S. Case no. 43 of 2009. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)