CRM-M- No. 19417 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- No. 19417 of 2010 Date of Decision : 04.11.2011 Sham Sunder Verma and another …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondents ………. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present: Mr. Pankaj Maini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Deepak Girotra, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, Senior Advocate with Mr. V.P.S. Mithewal, Advocate, for respondent No.2. *** Alok Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that vide order dated 23.7.2009 leaned Magistrate has discharged the petitioners on the cancellation report, submitted by the police. Order dated 23.7.2009, discharging the petitioners on the basis of cancellation report, submitted by the police, was challenged by the complainant before this Court in Crl. Revision No. 2594 of 2009. However, it was dismissed as withdrawn on the statement of learned counsel for the complainant that he would approach the learned Magistrate to decide the cancellation report. Learned counsel for the CRM-M- No. 19417 of 2010 2 petitioners has vehemently argued that even order dated 22.2.2010, passed by this Court in Crl. Revision No. 2594 of 2009, shall not be construed to mean that order discharging the accused-petitioners vide order dated 23.7.2009 was set aside. He has further argued that now Magistrate has absolutely no jurisdiction to issue notices to the petitioners vide order dated 17.4.2010. He, however, submits that petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate and shall file the detailed objection against the notices/order dated 17.4.2010, which was passed by the learned Magistrate without having jurisdiction. He seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. ( Alok Singh ) November 4, 2011 Judge Anand