IN THE HIGH COURT OFaiHATTI^ARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition NoJ'737/2(X)2 PEimONER Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Kam-iachari Sangh, Ambikapur, Distaict- Sat-guja throughite President -'•-I&nPravesh Singh S/o Late Shri Kapil Deo Singh, a^edabout 52 years,R/o Batti Boad Kedarpur, Arhbikapur (CG.). - Versus- RESPONDENTS .^ ^0'^ ^^/"t -/>' .<»' ^^y y"^ 1. State of QAfltttsgaEh, TlwoughSecretaiy, Ctepartaxient Qf Co-operative, Mantralaya, D.KJS. Buildm& Raipyi<CQ) 2. The Registrar, Co-operativeSodeiies, Raipiar(CG.) 3. Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Sodeties, Arribikapin-, Distt. Sarguja. 4. Fteputy itegistrar, Co-operative SocieUes, Acr&iSsiapw, Distt. Saiguja. 5. The E&strict Cantral Cooperative Bank Ltd. Amhi&apur, Throughit's Chairman at Ambikapur, ESstrict- Seiguja. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. ^T' L-\ ; CSL'' t\ ^,,Jf^— Details of ti-ie petition. T'-..c^ ^41A>^0^ ^SB"^ HIGH^OURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON'BLEMR.SATISHK.AGNIHOTRI.J, W7RIT PETITION N0.1737 OF 2002 m BS siBEtjiai T3fs4i+^/'sJ?'^^i^ 1 ^UUUll^/l Ziia Sahkari Kendriy Bank Karmachari Sangh, Anibikapur versus KCSVUllilCIi State ofChhattisgarh and others •f^C<f^Jt-^T SS&Ut Mr. Sameer Behar, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Sushil Diibey, Govemment Advocate for respondeats No.l to 4. Mr. Rajesh Pandey, counsel for respondentNo.5. (Passed on 28fll ofAugust, 2006) This petition is filed iii the representative capacity on behalf of daily wager employees seekiag reliefthat the members of the petitioner - Sangh be granted parity with the regular employees and further they be paid arrears of salaty from 1-1-1996 to 31-7- 1998. The members ofthe petitioner - Sangh were appoiirted oa daily wages basis on the basis of worlc required for them. They ••Z-— were giveii wages accordiagly. The appointmeat ofthe membei-s of the petitioner - Sangh was admittedly not in accordasice with law and iiot under Coiistifriitioual Scheme. ^i s«s?'st 2. In view of the dictum laid down by a Constitirtional Bench of the Suprems Court ip Secrefary, Stafe ofKamataka co'.d others vs. Urnadevi (3) andother^ and tfaereafier iurther followed in Mineral Explorafion Corporation Employees' Union vs. Mirieral E.Exploration Corporation Limited wid aricithe'/ and Nafiowl Fertilizers Limited arid others vs. SonwirSingh , tiie members ofthe petitionsr - Sangh have no riglrt to regularization, absoiption, contmuation or payment ofsalaiy at par ivitfa regular employees. For flie reasons above-stated, this petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Jadge 1 (2006)43cci 2 JT 2006 (7) SC 151 3 C2006) 5 SCC 493