IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO : 24191 of 2005 Between: M/s. B.R.Enterprises, Rep.by Proprietor, B.Manikya Rao S/o. late Bheem Rao R/o. Flat No.303, B.R.Residency H.No.1-1-148, Sardar Patel Road Secunderabad ..... PETITIONER AND Garison Engineer (I) R&D, RCI,Chandrayangutta Keshavagiri Post, Hyderabad-05 .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ,order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the action of the respondent in not issuing the tenders to the petitioner`s firm as arbitrary, illegal, and violative of principles of natural justice more specifically Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to issue tender to the petitioner`s firm andpass such other order or orders as this Hon`ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MRARCOTMAHESH Counsel for the Respondent: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : ORDER: The petitioner seeks to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not issuing the tenders to its firm, as illegal and arbitrary. None appears. It appears that the tender period has already been over. Hence, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. Date:13.03.2008 Ccm To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{TRK}