IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Writ Petition No. 2651 of 2005 --------------------------------------------------- - Office Notes, Office Memo- Court’s or randa of Coram,appearances Judge’s orders Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order. --------------------------------------------------- Shri G.S.Godbole for petitioner. Shri C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for respondents. CORAM: A.P.SHAH AND CORAM: A.P.SHAH AND CORAM: A.P.SHAH AND DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD JJ. DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD JJ. 21st June, 2005 21st June, 2005 21st June, 2005 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The reliefs claimed by the petitioner are beyond the scope of C ourt’s jurisdiction under Article 226. Surely the question of allignment of a road cannot be gone into in a petition under Article 226. Petition is, therefore, dismissed. 2. It is needless to say that if the authorities decide to acquire the property of the petitioner or any part thereof for the proposed road then the authorities will have to follow the procedure in accordance with law.