IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH NOVEMBER 2011 / 19TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 29864 of 2011(G) --------- -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- ASHITHA R.KURUP UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT SNVTT INSTITUTE,KAKKAZHAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, JAGATHY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 014 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 688 001 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 688 011 5. THE MANAGER, SNVTT INSTITUTE, KAKKAZHAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 688 005 6. SRI VIJI GEEVARGHESE, SNVTT INSTITUTE, KAKKAZHAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 688 005 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.S.JAMAL. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: STU WP(C).No. 29864 of 2011(G) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS : EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF APPOINTMENT OF THE PETITIONER EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE MANAGER OF THE SCHOOL EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B3-3134/07/K.DIS OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B2/4465/08/L.DIS OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(P) NO.317/2005/G.EDN. OF THE GOVERNMENT EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(P) NO.10/10/G EDN.OF THE GOVERNMENT EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(P)NO.199/2011/G.EDN.OF THE GOVERNMENT ALONG WITH EXTRACT OF APPENDIX 1(ALAPPUZHA DIST) EXT.P7(A): TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(P) NO.205/2011/G.EDN. OF THE GOVERNMENT EXT.P8 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE. STU S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.29864 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of November, 2011 JUDGMENT There is a dispute between the petitioner and the 6th respondent as to who is eligible to be appointed in a vacancy of Teacher Trainer, in the 5th respondent's Teachers' Training Institute, in which the 6th respondent has been appointed, which appointment has not been approved. The petitioner now apprehends that in view of the inclusion of the 6th respondent's name in the list prepared by the Government for approval in the wake of Government Orders permitting approval of teachers appointed without complying with the condition of appointment of protected teachers, the 6th respondent's appointment may be approved, although the refusal to approve the 6th respondent's appointment was only on the ground that the petitioner had a better claim over the vacancy. In the above circumstances, the petitioner has filed Ext.P8 petition before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner seeks a W.P.(C)No.29864/11 2 direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P8 expeditiously. Having heard the learned Government Pleader also, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P8, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as respondents 5 and 6, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd W.P.(C)No.29864/11 3 W.P.(C)No.29864/11 4