^o^ '^. sahu mCH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR WjrttPctitUonfONo,74Wi5of2007 PETmONER : Gend Lal (Ram) Ba^sel, S/o Shri Chintaram Ba^iet, aged about 40 yeais, R/o Gram Pancfaayat Amora, Post Shambalpur, TehsiI-Nawagath, Distt Diug(CG). VERSUS RE8PONDENT8 : 1. StateofCMiattisgarii,fhrou^iits 8ecretaty,Dept. of Panchayat and Rural Develqpment, DKS Bahwan, Mantralaya, fiaipur (CG). 2. Additional Collector, Bemetara, Distt. Durg (CG). 3. The Sub Divisional OfiBcer, Bemetara, DiA. Durg 4. SlMtrughan Lal, S/o Shri Jagjeevan Lal Kanshik, aged about 29 years, R/o Village Amora, Tliaaa, Nad^iat, TehsU-Navagarh, Distt. Dmg (CO). (WRTT HETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA) (SB: Hon'bIcMr.SatishK.AiBnihudriLJ.) Pr^eut : Shri P.S. Koshy, Advocate for the petitionw. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, GovCTnment Adv<xate for the State. ORALQRDER (Passcd on 13th ofDccember, 2007) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for tiie p^itioiwr suhnuts that hearing eC tiie Revision by AAiitional Collector, Bemetara, has been finaUy argued on 29.11.2007andpostfbrju^mentoa 27.12.2007. ; 2. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Leamed Oovenunent Counsel appeariag for Ihe State/respondent No. 1 to 3 subnrits that if Ifae reyision filed by the petitioner has been heard finally, he will request flie aufliority coricemed i.e. Additional Collector, Bemetara, District Durg, to pass the order before 19.12.2007. 3. In view oflfae above statement made by leamed Govemmeat Counsel, the writ petition is disposed of. No order asto cmts. Sd/- : Satish K. Agnihotri Judge i