IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 2ND MARCH 2009 / 11TH PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 6610 of 2009(U) ------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- R.JALAJA, W/O.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, VILLAGE ASSISTANT, VILLAGE OFFICE, CHADAYAMANGALAM KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, RESIDING AT SREEKRISHNA VILASAM, ELAMADU P.O., AYOOR, KOTTARAKKARA. BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR RESPONDENT: --------------- THE COMMISSIONER FOR LAND REVENUE, PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-33. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J. ------------------------- W.P ( C) No. 6610 of 2009 -------------------------- Dated this the 2nd March,2009 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a Village Assistant in Revenue Department. She joined service as L.D Clerk in Block Office, Kottarakkara on 22.3.1989. She has passed DOM test in December 1996, which is evidenced by Exhibit-P2. She passed Account Test in June 2002 which is evidenced by Exhibit-P3. Exhibit-P4 shows that the petitioner has passed Revenue Test in December 2005 and Exhibit-P5 shows that she has also passed Chain Survey Test in the year 2008. 2. According to the petitioner, in respect of many other persons even though they have not passed the Chain Survey Test, their probation was declared. Therefore the petitioner had been representing the matter since she did not get any favourable order, she filed WPC No.23619/2008 before this Court and by Exhibit-P6 judgment, this Court has directed the 1st respondent W.P ( C) No. 6610 of 2009 2 therein to consider and pass orders on Exhibit-P3 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. 3. Presently, the petitioner has got a contention that a number of juniors have been promoted though they did not have the prescribed qualification and had not completed their probation satisfactorily in the feeder category and the petitioner alone is singled out and she has been denied promotion stating that she has not completed her probation satisfactorily. 4. In these circumstances, petitioner has filed Exhibit-P7 representation before the respondent seeking for various reliefs. She has sought for declaration of probation and to give her all increments and service benefits including monetary benefits. The prayer is to reckon her seniority in the cadre of Lower Division Clerk with reference to the order dated 17.3.1989 and to give promotion to the cadre of Junior Superintendent/Deputy Tahasildar since many of her juniors are continuing as Deputy Tahasildar and Junior Superintendent and even as W.P ( C) No. 6610 of 2009 3 Tahasildar by temporary promotion. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit-P7 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner or any other affected parties. (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) ma W.P ( C) No. 6610 of 2009 4 W.P ( C) No. 6610 of 2009 5