IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26198 of 2010 RAM BALAK DAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 11.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Informant’s son disappeared from cricket field on 11.4.2010 and his dead body recovered on 13.4.2010. In the First Information Report, there is averment regarding remaining of the deceased with some of the co-accused persons and suspicion is cast against informant’s brother and this petitioner also about killing of the deceased. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that only basing suspicion, no liability can be fixed to refuse petitioner’s anticipatory bail. But one of the witnesses examined in para-8 states about presence of this petitioner along with co-accused persons at near bamboo clamp of one Shambhu Chaudhary where dead body recovered in suspicious condition. So, it appears not a case of suspicion only disentitling petitioner for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer of petitioner for anticipatory bail stands rejected. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)