IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 5TH JANUARY 2007 / 15TH PAUSHA 1928 Ins.APP.No. 80 of 2006() ------------------------ IC.58/1994 of ESI COURT,IDUKKI .................... APPELLANT/OPP.PARTY ------------------------------------ THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, E.S.I. CORPORATION, ESI BUILDING, NORTH SWARAJ ROUND, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SMT.T.D.RAJALAKSHMY, SC, ESI CORPN. RESPONDENTS: APPLICANT ---------------------- M/S.CONSOLIDATED VENEERS, CHINGAVANAM, KOTTAYAM REPRESENTED BY THE MG.PARTNER SIBI THOMAS. BY THIS INSURANCE APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & M.N. KRISHNAN, JJ. = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = INS. Appeal NO. 80 OF 2006 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 5th day of January, 2007. J U D G M E N T Radhakrishnan, J. The Insurance Appeal is preferred against the order of the Insurance Court, Idukki in I.C.58/04. No question of law has been raised for consideration in this appeal. After remand the Insurance Court again found that the applicant’s establishment is not liable to be covered under the provisions of the E.S.I. Act since it has not employed more than 10 persons for wages in his establishment. It has also stated that the Inspector who submitted the Inspection Report did not verify any registers and records maintained by the applicant. There is also no evidence to show that 10 or more persons were employed for wages under the applicant. In such circumstances, the appeal is devoid of merit and it is dismissed. K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-