C.W.P. No. 8251 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 8251 of 2008 Date of decision : 16.5.2008. ... Sube Singh ................ Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri Present: Sh. Umesh Narang, Advocate for the petitioner Sh. Harish Rathee, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. ... Jasbir Singh, J. (Oral) Notice of motion. Sh. Harish Rathee, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has laid challenge to the order dated 2.5.2008 (P-4), vide which it has been decided to terminate services of the petitioner alongwith many other employees, on the ground that initially when they were taken in service, the rule adopted was not proper. It is the contention of counsel for the petitioner that order to terminate the petitioner, has been passed on the basis of some enquiry C.W.P. No. 8251 of 2008 -2- in which the petitioner was never associated. Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is a regular employee and his services cannot be terminated without complying with the service rules i.e. only after conducting a regular departmental enquiry. Counsel further states that case of the petitioner is squarely covered in his favour, by ratio of the judgment of this Court in the case of Sheela Devi vs. State of Haryana and others, CWP No.5770 of 2008 decided on 7.4.2008 (P-5). Faced with this situation, Sh. Rathee has failed to show us anything to the contrary. In view of above, we dispose of this writ petition in the same terms as in the case of Sheela Devi's case (supra). ( Jasbir Singh ) Judge ( K.C. Puri ) 16.5.2008. Judge chug