Criminal Revision No.328 of 2008. -1- In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. Date of decision : 18.2.2008. Ram Pal ..... Petitioner. vs. State of Punjab ..... Respondent. Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.S.Madan. Present: Mrs.Bhupinder Pal Kaur Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner. R.S.Madan, J. The petitioner has filed this revision against the order dated 9.10.2007 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Samana, whereby his application for summoning of official of Punjab School Education Board, Mohali, along with inquiry report dated 29.5.2000 and also service record of Babu Ram (retired clerk) was dismissed. A criminal case under Sections 193, 196, 465, 466, 468, 471, 120-B IPC was got registered by Shri Sham Lal, JMIC, Samana, on the ground that accused- petitioner produced on the file forged inquiry which was got exhibited as Ex.DX. On inquiry, it was found that inquiry report, Ex.DX, was never got conducted by the Punjab School Education Board and DW1 Babu Ram examined by the accused- petitioner in his defence was a false person. He was not an employee of the Board and thereupon the case was got registered against the petitioner. The petitioner filed application for the summoning of same record for which the transferee court has already concluded that there was no inquiry report dated 29.5.2000. This application was moved by the petitioner by engaging another counsel only to delay the matter which is already more than seven years old. The trial court, however, Criminal Revision No.328 of 2008. -2- dismissed the application by giving liberty to the petitioner to summon any other witness in his defence. Learned counsel for the petitioner was unable to convince this court that the impugned order passed by the learned trial court suffers from any infirmity or in any case prejudice the defence of the petitioner. This aspect was already dealt with by the transferee court prior to the moving of this application. The said order has attained the finality as no revision was filed. Finding no merit in the revision, the same is hereby dismissed. 18.2.2008 (R.S.Madan) vs. Judge.