IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26330 of 2010 1. MD.RAFIK MOULVI 2. MD AINUL HAQUE 3. BIBI FARHANA 4. BIBI NURJEHAN 5. BIBI FARJAN ALI 6. BIBI SAKILA ------------------------ PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 23.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that Co-accused Md. Mokrim is only alleged for having sexual intercourse with the informant, assuring to marry as her husband was in Delhi for his livelihood. Petitioners are alleged for not accepting her when she came to said Md. Mokrim. Act of the informant and Md. Mokrim may be said immoral, balancing more to informant’s side but never may be directed towards petitioners’ side for any criminality, justifying refusal of their anticipatory bail. In the facts of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of communication of this order, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two 2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Birpur, Supaul in Birpur P.S. Case No. 43 of 2009, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)