c ? • ^ o IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ^J>9^ WRIT PETITION fC) No. /2011 y »; PETITIONER ^^ j^^ i.<~//7l? ..•'•' Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, Age about 40years, Son of Shri Deen Dayal Agrawal, Kharsia, R/o Chandantal Road, Kharsia, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ^^^-u- A&'IS-- RESPONDENTS VERSUS , 1. Municipal Conucil Kharsia, Through- Its Commissioner, Kharsia, Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) 2. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Kharsia, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.). 3. The Coltector Raigarh,Distt,-Raigarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA liSliaaiH BSI HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARM : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 N0.6398 OF 2011 PETITIONER Sanjay Kumar Agrawal Versus Municipal Council, Kharsiya & Others RESPONDENTS (Writ Petitionunder Article 226/227 ofthe Constitution oflndia) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K.Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Amit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Panel Lawyer forthe State. ORDER ISt (Passed on this 21s1 day of November, 2011) Heard learned counsel for the parties. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 submits that though the noticewas issued to a proper person, however, case of the petitioner is that the petitioner isan occupant of the land in dispute and he is not the person to whom the notice has been issued. Under these circumstances, the petitioner would also be given proper opportunity to put forward his case before taking a decision on the question of illegality / legality of the structure raised therein and also right of the petitioner, before passing the order of demolition, if so advised, in accordance with law. In view of the above, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothingsurvivesin this petition for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. ^-^ov<v Gowri ^ c>^ ^"y