IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.12693 of 2009 SMT. ANNU SINGH, WIFE OF SRI SATYAJEET KUMAR SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SINGH NIWAS(NEAR JAIN MANDIR), NEW AREA, P.S. TOWN, AURANGABAD, DISTRICT AURANGABAD, BIHAR---PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS, MINISTRY, NEW DELHI. 2. THE HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD., THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 17, JAMSHED JI TATA ROAD, MUMBAI-20. 3. THE G.M., ZONAL OFFICE, H.P.C.L., KOLKATA. 4. THE D.G.M., L.P.G., DIVISION, EAST ZONE, KOLKATA. 5. THE SR. REGIONAL MANAGER, PATNA REGION, PATNA. 6. SMT. BHAWANA SINGH, WIFE OF AMRENDRA PRATAP SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHANHARA, P.O. RAM CHANDRA NAGAR, P.S. JAMBORE, DISTRICT AURANGABAD, BIHAR---RESPONDENTS. ----------- 03. 09.10.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.. 2. Petitioner was an applicant for appointment as L.P.G. dealer pursuant to advertisement, Annexure-1. Her case along with the case of first empanelled candidate Smt. Bhawana Singh, private respondent no.6 as also others was considered by the Evaluation Committee pursuant to interview held on 18-20.6.2009 and the marks obtained by the appearing candidates in shown in the result sheet dated 20.6.2009 contained in Annexure-4 to this application. Perusal of Annexure-4 indicates that Smt. Bhawana Singh secured highest marks i.e. 96.3 and became the first empanelled candidate, out of 96.3 marks she secured 25 marks for godown and 10 marks for showroom. Petitioner has been placed at serial No.2 in the panel. She secured 95.7 marks, out of which she secured 25 and 10 marks for godown and showroom. 3. Petitioner has filed this writ application assailing the grant of 25 and 10 marks to Smt. Bhawana Singh for godown and showroom as according to her such grant is contrary to the norms fixed in the brochure, which is contained in Annexure-2 vide Clause-8.1. In this connection, it is - 2 - submitted with reference to the sale deed of the plot where the godown proposed of the Bhawana Singh is situate that the ingress and egress to the godown is not free as the sale deed, Annexure-5 itself would indicate that the godown is bounded by two cold storage and egress and ingress in the godown is through the cold storage, which has already been leased out to the Food Corporation of India. Highlighting the aforesaid aspect of the matter petitioner represented before the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Kolkata vide representation contained in Annexure-9 at page 76 to this application but close perusal thereof indicates that the same has not been addressed to any of the authorities of the Corporation neither there is any date over the representation. It is therefore, evident that the same was not considered by the authority of the Corporation while passing order dated 30.6.2009 over the representation of the petitioner dated 24.6.2009. 4. In the circumstances, I direct the petitioner to file another representation addressed to the D.G.M., L.P.G., East Zone, Kolkata annexing copy of the representation, Annexure-9, which should be considered in accordance with law as early as possible, in any case within one month from the date of receipt of the representation of the petitioner along with a copy of this order. Any appointment made in regard to the dealership in question shall be subject to the result of the representation of the petitioner. 5. This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of. Rajesh/ (V.N.Sinha, J.)