IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.881 of 2010 1. SUDHA KUMARI W/O SRI SHAILENDRA KUMAR R/O MOH- TEJA TOLA, KATIHAR, P.S- KATIHAR, DISTT- KATIHAR Versus 1. THE V.C., B.N.MANDAL UNIVERSITY LALOO NAGAR, MADHEPURA 2. THE REGISTRAR, B.N. MANDAL UNIVERSITY, LALOO NAGAR, MADHEPURA 3. THE EXAMINATION CONTROLLER, B.N.MANDAL UNIVERSITY, LALOO NAGAR, MADHEPURA 4. THE PRINCIPAL MILLAT FAKHARUDDIN ALI AHMAD, B.E.D. TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE, PURNEA ----------- 4 10.01.2011 Petitioner had filed this writ application for a direction to allow her to appear in the B.Ed. examination which was scheduled to be held from 28.1.2010. The said examination has already been held and, therefore, no direction can be issued in favour of the petitioner for the same. However, from Annexure-4, it appears that the petitioner has already submitted a representation addressed to the Vice Chancellor and which was duly forwarded by the Principal of the training college, and which was received in the office of the Vice Chancellor on 23.12.2009. In the circumstances, it will be appropriate for the Vice Chancellor to consider the representation of the petitioner 2 and if he finds that the petitioner is eligible for appearing in the next ensuing examination of B.Ed., and the regulations permit the same, he shall pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner positively before the last date of submission of form and fee expires. In case, he does not find petitioner eligible for appearing in the examination, he shall pass reasoned order and communicate the same to the petitioner before that date itself. With the above observations and directions this writ application is disposed of. Arvind/ ( J. N. Singh, J.)