CWP No. 7003 of 2008 M/s Shankar v. UHBVN Present: Mr.Rajinder Goyal , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.B.S.Rana, Advocate for the respondents. *** The petitioner has challenged notice for deposit of enhanced security amount issued to them by the respondents . During arguments, it has transpired that this enhanced security is being demanded in view of Regulation Number HERC/12/2005 dated 26.07.2005 framed by the Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission whereby this demand has been made mandatory. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action. The only caveat that learned counsel have put is that the interim order granted by this Court while issuing notice of motion, to the effect that the petitioners was permitted to furnish security by way of bank guarantee should continue for reasonable time so as to enable the petitioner to file a fresh petition and seek appropriate interim order from the Court. Learned counsel for the respondents has very fairly stated that the respondents will not encash the bank guarantee for a period of 30 days from today unless there is a default in the payment of the bill by the petitioner. CWP No. 7003 of 2008 -2- In this view of the matter, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner as aforesaid. Copy of this order may be given to the learned counsel for the parties under the signatures of the Reader of this Court. (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE August 22, 2008 sunita