IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD Criminal Petition Nos.4961, 5232, 5234, 5236, 6302 and 6241 of 2009 Crl.P.No.4961 of 2009 Between: D. Srinivas .. Petitioner AND P. Sravani and another .. Respondents Crl.P.No.5232 of 2009 Between: D. Srinivas and 5 others .. Petitioners AND P. Sravani and another .. Respondents Crl.P.No.5234 of 2009 Between: D. Srinivas and 5 others .. Petitioners AND P. Sravani and another .. Respondents Crl.P.No.5236 of 2009 Between: D. Srinivas & 4 others .. Petitioners AND P. Sravani and another .. Respondents Crl.P.No.6302 of 2009 Between: Prasad and 2 others .. Petitioners AND P. Sravani and another .. Respondents Crl.P.No.6241 of 2009 Between: D. Srinivas and 2 others .. Petitioners AND P. Sravani and another .. Respondents COMMON ORDER: Smt. P. Sravani, the wife and Sri D. Srinivas, the husband involved in all these six Criminal Petitions appeared in person before the Court and they are identified by Sri M. Jagadish Kumar, learned counsel for quash petitioners in all the cases and Sri Srinivasa Reddy Balakoti, learned counsel for Smt. P. Sravani in all the cases. The wife and the husband filed a Memorandum of Understanding narrating the events between them and agreement by the husband to pay Rs.5,50,000/- to the wife, agreement by the wife to withdraw the complaint in C.C.No.307 of 2009 on the file of XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad and not to pursue and execute the orders in DVC.No.3 of 2009 on the file of XI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad. They also stated about the divorce petition in O.P.No.93 of 2010 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Secunderabad and the declaration that no claims are left between them mutually after the compromise. They also agreed to withdraw all the allegations made against each other. Smt. P. Sravani and Sri D. Srinivas, the wife and the husband, admitted the contents and the terms of Memorandum of Understanding and accordingly, the Memorandum of Understanding is recorded. Consequently, the interim orders under challenge in Criminal Petition Nos.4961, 5232 and 5234 of 2009 have to be set aside and Criminal Petition No.5236 of 2009 has to be disposed of as infructuous as DVC.No.3 of 2009 on the file of XI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad has been disposed of on merits by the trial Court. Criminal Petition Nos.6302 and 6241 of 2009 have to be allowed in respect of the petitioners quashing the further proceedings against them in C.C.No.307 of 2009 on the file of XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, in view of the terms and conditions of the Memorandum of Understanding and more particularly the withdrawal of complaint by Smt. P. Sravani under the compromise. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition Nos.4961, 5232, 5234, 6302 and 6241 of 2009 are allowed and Criminal Petition No.5236 of 2009 is dismissed as infructuous in terms of the Memorandum of Understanding between Smt. P. Sravani and Sri D. Srinivas and they are informed the result of the Criminal Petitions accordingly. _____________________ G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J Date: 19-10-2011 Ksn