IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.p. No.37B3/2gg§ / gETITIONER : Indrawati, D/o. Late Dwarika, PLAINTIFF Caste Sahu, aged about 27 yrs, Occupation House wife, R/o. Village Govindpur, P.S. — // Vishrampur, Tahsi%.§urajpur, k , w i Distt. Surguja (CEGs) VERsg§ RESPONDENTS = 1) Dhanpatiya, w/o. Late'Dwarika Sahu, aged about 6 yars, Occupation House wfe. R/o. Village Govindpur. P.S. shrampur, Tahsil Surajpur Distt. urguja (C.G.) Shanti, W/o. Rampratap, Caste — Sahu, aged about 24 years. Occupation House wife, R/o. Vllage Govindur, P.S. Vihram— pur, Tahsil Surajpur, Distt. rguja (C.G. General Managr, S.E.C.L. Vish~ rampur,area7Vishrampur, Tahl Surajpur, istt. Surguja (C.G.) Sub—Area Manager, S.E.C.L.Kumda, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) 5) Additional Distt. Judge,SLuajpur ‘\ Distt. Surguja (C.G.) (ShriSan_ jay Sehdere) & Sub-‘Araa Kumda, Tahsil Surajpur / 3 e i %& Vi S i p s Su ) e si D f/ ’ y” yRxT PETITxON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 o§yTHE CONSTITUTIOg OF INDx§ XLHazz _ 7 __ a WWW?M$?5} $2M) mg Q5£3£©Q4 Shl‘i D‘vvivsdi, comlSel f0? ihe paitioner. Ajay Heard. V Learned coun$e1 for the petitioner sgymt‘s that the petitioner had fiied an application for stay befor :he Ceurt i g g below, wkéch waS rejectecl vide cede“; daeed' 17. 10.2003. . t‘1e Court, below, ihad itoelf fixed the case for final § i However, 7 heaying on 10. 1 1.2003. consic1ered :Ee facts amd ciycumsiarxceS aim Having material on record a11d the fact that the Court beiow itseif had fixed the case for final h‘ear‘mg, in the opmion of thig Court, 11o caae for interference ’13 _ made out “x‘xfhiie exercieing the jurisdictioii under Articie‘ 226/ “2'27 of the Conetitution of India. However, it 1S made Clear that ‘1 the appeal has not yet. been heard for one reason or the other, it be beard as‘ early at; poestble preferably withérr 3 weeks frOm the (late of proditetiorr \ of this order before the Court below. At this stage, learned counsel forrthe petitioner euhrnirs :“rllatlthejalterestoiLthe.nelitiilneramay..be,proteotedtofntn1extent 4‘‘ _‘L’1ie oiher side} furnishes iruideytakmgfSecuyity' 0f the iike x amourJi. With the afore‘saici d dieposed 0f at thiS Stage. .ConSequently, M.W.P‘ ~ $30 $131161 diSposed of. aservatione, this pe‘dtion Stands \l"( <17 406z2003 am LANO. 10925/2008 \ Sdl- Fakh ruddin f/Judge i X13022 ~ W; ‘ S ‘WW, Wan—6' We ~ // WW ‘W ”1aa! $5!$ g 533 204) f3?{a mm fm J W‘m w 'nh W l W mm :W # l r arimfaah $am”. W 1?m @1231m ihai if ultimately sh€ succam‘s, $h€ 1 my be abk to racover ’{he amount. It 1S opal to {he petitiansr to make such an application b€for€ €36 appropriatE Court and if ush a3 appkcatian 2% is made, her inteYESt, if required, may be proiected by the Court, in case