‘65 IN THE HIGH C(IJRT OF JUDIQATURE AT B$L$SPUR CHHAIIIGARH. ’‘‘S W.. P N0. ‘ (a G (b 200 1. z I ystrict Co.op Central Bank, btd. Ep C . B , ilasur. Through the General Manager, Distt. o... op. C. B. lrtd ila smr C. G. Versus, nd O . r e i C 3. Daputy Registrar, Co-opratve Scceies, <9 bxaxw W Bil&spur, C. G. 1. M. P. State c. perative Tribunal, Bhopal, M.P Throgh he Chirma u t an IVLP S.Co..op Tribunal, Bhopal,2vi. P. 2. Joiht Registar, CmOprative 5oceties, Bilaspur, at present at Raipur. .G. ( R a t said Va Distt. BilaSpur Chattisgarh. Lamps Prabandha, District Co~operative, Jila sahaari Kendria Bank xviaryaait, Ram Nath Mishra s/o .Ma, /o parh, Po s a, i sakari, , h k k y B ila sr, Chhattisgarh PETIIN UNDER RTICLE 226/227 OF HE CON$ITUION OF INDIA TO A T TT F$ ISwNCE A OF 3-) WRIT OF APPROPRIATE EETURE CR DIREliN ’TQ CR ORDER LIKE N‘QEURE. §€ PETTxoNER. jwm ei it a? . G.Rishr pu . 6g HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH 1 BILASPUR \ Writ Petition No. 1666 of 2001 Petitiouer Respondents Versus District Co-op Central Bank Ltd. Bilaspur Operative Tribunal, Bhopal WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihoui J.) ' M‘ P. State C0~ 85 others ‘ None for the petitioner. . No. 2 and 3/Sfate. Shri Komal Pandey, Advocate for the respondent No. 4. \\\ ORDERwrall ( Passed on this 22nd day of Maxch, 2010) The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. petitioner may not be interested in prosecuting the matter. The 2. In View Sdl Satish K. Agnihom i VILMJ‘E’dfgtier melon