IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 24 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 13 OF 2005 SHRI BABLO P. PRABHU, PONDA GOA. ... Petitioner Versus SHRI. V. K. JHA, ... Respondent Mrs. A. Agni, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. S. Mordekar, Additional Government Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- A. P. LAVANDE, J. Date:- 2nd August, 2011 P.C. Heard Mrs. A. Agni, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Ms. S. Mordekar, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent. 2. This contempt petition was initiated by the petitioner since order dated 10.3.2011 passed by the Division Bench in Writ Petition no. 13/2005 was not complied with by the respondent. In the said Writ Petition learned Advocate General stated that the petitioner would be redeployed in Water Resources Department, as Junior Engineer( Mechanical) and necessary orders would be issued within a period of two weeks, effective from 1.4.2011. The statement was accepted. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that the said order was not complied with. 4. In the present petition reply has been filed by the respondent which discloses that respondent has already issued an order on 27.6.2011, redeploying the petitioner as Junior Engineer( Mechanical) in the Water Resources Department. 5. No doubt there is delay on the part of the respondent in complying order dated 10.3.2011. However since the order has been issued by the respondent, I do not deem it necessary to proceed with the contempt petition. Accordingly contempt petition is disposed of. A. P. LAVANDE, J. vn