IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CQNTBMPT CASE [C] N0 ,OF 2010 ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED: 05/03/2010 PASSEDyIN WRIT PETITION fS] N0. 916 / 2010fSINGLE BANCH] PETITIONER: [Applicant] ^^' .%'€1>^ ^"y ^ cfi- ^ '^ Dr. Smt. Shashi Claudius, W/o Dr.Shri B.K.Claudius, Aged about 57 years, Block Medical Officer [uncharged] In the office of the Communitv Health Center [C.H.C.] Balod, R/o Ganjpara Balod, Dist. Durg (C.G.) Versus ^ CQNTEMNORS: 1. (RESPONDENTS) Dr. Jagdish Chandra Mesharam, @ J.C.Mesharam S/o not known Age - about 55 years. Posted as:- The Chief Medical and Health Officer Durg, Dist. Durg [C.G.] (RESPONDENT No. 3, in W.P. [S]) Dr. Mr. Babulal[B.L.] Ratre, S/o not known Age - about 50 years. Presently posted as:- Block Medical Officer [In charged] <^( \/ (f In the office of the Community Health Center [C.H.C.] Balod, Dist. Durg [C.G.] (RESPONDENT No. 4, in W.P. [S] ) CONTEMPT PETITION U/A~215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA r/w SECTION 14 OF THE CONTEMFT OF COURTS ACT ;-HC-22 ^n^T^i f^w^nt^ 5b^icn '^^?i Deepti ~^c[ ^|41d^, ^xil^^Ko, i®i<yii^y u. WW?iT 5h*<i<=h 3TT^?T ^f^K ..&^:.:...&?.. c)^' ^ 200 ?0 'f^^ST' 3:n^r'^?TW^?r chl^fd41r< '^IPR^ff ^ ft^ <p3i<^j< '^''yrf^TR 'STT^T SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra IVtohad Shrivastava, J. 20-01-2011 Shri Vijay Deshmukh, counse Shri Akhilesh Kumar, counsel Learned counsel for the peti for the petitioner. for respondents. fcioner submite that the order passed by this Court on 5/3/2010 has been c^mplied with, though beiatedly and after filing ofthis contempt petition on 23/P/2010. Learned counsei for the resfoondents submitted that after the order was passed by this Court, the resj^ was issued on 25/3/2010 for handi] charge was also handed over to th| from Annexure R-1/2. He submite I was complied with shows that ther^ of this Court. This Court had passed the o| the petitioner and the charge has icndent took prompt steps and an order ng over charge to the petitioner and the 3 petitioner on 31/3/2010, as is refiected hat the promptitude with whjch the order was no wiilfui disobedience of the order der on 5/3/2010, in compliance whereof, the respondent No.1 issued order <{>n 25/3/2010 for handing over charge to been handed over to the petitioner on -31/3/2010. Therefore, in the opinion of ttiis Court, no case of willfui disobedience of the order passed by this Court is| made out. Ruie is therefore discharged. The petition is finalJy disposed off. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge I -^ tp'ri t'