sk INTHEHON.BI.EBIGHGOURTOFGHHATTIGARH ATBILASPt]& ^ ^(^)tS^|JPS W.P.I^a&^T-fc y^><^ \ 20(M> [S^B.] ^?^^ <" ' ^ .•—';-:1"—1 ^ _,,„____. (PETmQN UNDERARTICLE. 227 .CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETtTIONER: ^ADiruddha Kuinar Asara S\0 Shri Amrit Lal AgedAbout50YearsOccupation:Businessman R\0 Nayapara Raipur Tahasil&Distt.Raipur(C.G.) '^ •. - . • ' '. VERSUS . :,;• : ; :: , RESPONDENTS: \^T; Municipal Corporatioii, AppealCommittee, < ^ ^ ! ' , . .. 1, : '^ / .' . -~._ '.•.•.1 ^ ^f-r-^ Raipur Through Commissioner , Raipur (CG) .y'"v. ^. ' . :. : • • , ': '. : :- •: fcv%v3^"" <^GsQe{u^&lmarAsaca. ...•lil^^:;;J:'':.s^^ ^^' v S/0 Vallabh Das Asara R 10: HauseNo. 10/487, BudliaPara,Rai@ur Tahasil .& Qistt. Raipur (CG) PET'EttION 1BNDER AR1IGLE. 227 CQNSmTTUTIQN < INTOCA 19503B lSStlENCE^O^WiffiTF(^C>UASHI]^QRDE^ L-cyapl. —-Tt-.'-'A^ A n DrtrTha r<^,se-Xitll IM na ^•^ 'f^\ 'VgS?5% J ^ ^yy^- '•-itli>aali^^\v' ^;'v' HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra PETiTIONER RESPONDENT Writ Petition (227) No. 1341/2008 Aniruddha Kumar Asara. Vsrsus IVIunicipal Corporatlon, Appeat Commlttee and another. °' Shri Amiyakant Tiwari, counse! for the petitioner. Shri H.B. Agrawai, Senior Advocate with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, counsel for the respondent No.1. Shri Manoj Paranjpe, counsel for rsspondent No.2. WRJT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ORAL RDER 13.01.2011) Being aggrieved by the order of mutation passed by the Municipa! Corporation, Raipur on 05/05/2000, the respondent No,2 preferred an appeal before the Appeat Committee of Municipal Corporation, Raipur. The sa'd appeal was allowed by the Appeal Committee vide order dated 04/05/2005 (Annexure P/2). To chalienge this appeHate order, the petitioner preferred an appeai under Section 149 of the Chhaffisgarh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 before .the XII Additional District Judge (F.T.C-), Raipur. The said sppeal was dismissed on 07/01/2008 (Annexure P/3). (2) In She present petition the impugned order Annexure P/2 and P/3 are under challenge. (3) Admittediy, the dispute regard'ng the title to the subject property is pending consideration in the Civil Court, therefore in view of the pendency of the said Civi! Suit the present proceedings for mutation of the name has become academic inasmuch as even for any interim order the parties can make suitable prayer before the Civil Court. (4) Needless to say that the decree passed by the Civil Court shall supersede the order of mutation passed by the Municipal Corporation, therefore the present writ petition has been rendered academic. It is therefore disposed of with observation that the parties shall ultimately be. bound bythe decree passed bythe Civil Court. -^ --__- Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge