SBCWP No.2877/1999. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR. O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2877/1999. Suresh Kumar & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of Order:- 9/7/2008. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri P.L. Sharma for the petitioners. Shri Shiv Lal Meena, Deputy Government Counsel. ***** BY THE COURT:- Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2) This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners contending that they should be treated eligible for appointment on the post of Teacher Grade-III as per their qualification of Madhyama from Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board under the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board Act, 1981. 3) Shri Shiv Lal Meena, learned Deputy Government Counsel while opposing the writ petition has contested the claim of the petitioners and has submitted that qualification of Madhyama from Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board has not been treated as equivalent to Praveshika or Secondary Examination for appointment on the post of Teacher Grade-III. Alternatively, the State in their reply stated that last candidate appointed in the general category in the selection process in question secured 72.71% marks whereas, petitioners No.1 and 2 who are both SBCWP No.2877/1999. 2 general category candidates secured 55.57% and 49.97% marks, respectively. 4) In view of the aforesaid assersion of the respondents, point with regard to qualification of the petitioners being equivalent is not required to be decided. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. anil (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J.