IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 17750 OF 2008 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO. 17749 OF 2008 Ratanshaw D. Disawalla and anr. ......Appellants versus Cyrus R. Disawalla and ar. ......Respondents. Ms.Rajani Iyer i/by. Arshad Haindaday, adv.for appellants. Mr.R.M. Vasudev, for respondents no.1 and 2. Coram: Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J. Dated : 31 st July, 2008. P.C. : 1. This is a dispute between members of family over residential premises of which appellant no.1 is the tenant. During the pendency of the Notice of Motion in the City Civil Court, there was an order directing the parties to maintain status-quo. While dismissing the Notice of Motion, the learned Judge extended the order of status-quo for a period of 4 weeks to enable the appellants to prefer the instant appeal. There is a serious allegation made on the part of the respondents that after passing of the order of status-quo, the appellants had violated the same by installing an additional grill door to the house. This fact is not disputed. The appellants seek to justify the action on the ground that this was done by them in order to prevent forcible entry of the respondents in the suit premises. If there was an apprehension of forcible entry on the part of the respondents, it was incumbent for the appellants to approach the court. In view of violation of the order of status-quo, the appellants are not entitled to equitable relief of injunction. Hence the Civil Application is disposed off. [Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J]