Cri. Apln. No. 2572/11 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2572 OF 2011 Suryakant s/o. Laxman Manchewar, R/o. Basmath, Tq. Basmath, Dist. Hingoli. ....Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent. Mr. S.S. Rathi, Advocate for applicant. Mr. B.J. Sonawane, APP for State/respondent. CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 11th July, 2011. PER COURT : 1. This application is filed for bail in Cr. No. 102/11 registered in Rural Police Station, Nanded for offences under sections 373, 363, 342, 34 etc. of IPC. Papers of investigation were made available. Both the sides are heard. 2. The crime is registered on the basis of report given by one Dhanaji Kokane, father of prosecutrix. He has made allegations that his daughter aged about 17 years was taken away from his house by one Preety by making representation that she would be taken to beauty parlour of Mukta, where training of the work of beauty parlour would be given to her. When the father received phone call of daughter, he realized that his daughter was kept in the premises of Mukta. Subsequently, the daughter Cri. Apln. No. 2572/11 2 disclosed that there was force on her to keep illicit relations with a person, who was saying that he was brother of Muktabai and as she refused, she was detained in the house. 3. The APP submitted that no medical examination of prosecutrix was done as there was no allegation of rape. It appears that the investigation is completed. The complainant is resident of village Phulenagar, Tahsil Umerga, District Latur and present applicant is from Basmat, District Hingoli. Allegations are mainly against ladies like Preety and Mukta and it is contended that present applicant was visiting the house of Mukta. In view of these circumstances, bail can be granted to applicant, subject to some conditions. 4. So the application is allowed. The applicant Suryakant s/o. Laxman Manchewar is to be released on bail in Cr. No. 102/2011 registered with Rural Police Station, Nanded for offence punishable under sections 373, 363, 342, 34 etc. of IPC on his furnishing PR and SB of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand). He is not to tamper with the prosecution witnesses and he is not to enter Udgir, where the complainant and the prosecutrix are living. [ T. V. NALAWADE, J.] ssc/criapln2572.11