QEEEORE THE‘HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT Bl3LASPUR LQtIHATTlSGARH ) 1 wup. Lg) No.333‘b of 2009 ; ‘i __/ Rajaram‘Ahirwar, S/o ;Shri Jujui Ahirwar, aged about 46 years, R/o Padumsara, Block—Saja, Distt. Durg (C.G.) working in the post of Rural 'Agriculture Extension Officer, Block- EELHTIONER Saja, Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS /1 State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Agriculture Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Deputy Secretary Department of Agriculture, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur Chhattisgarh Shri Jagdish Giri Goshwami, Block- Lohandiguda, Distt. Jagdaipur (C.G.) working under in the office of Deputy Director Agricuiture, Distt. Jagdaipur (C.G.) ‘ ‘1“ ‘ i i i WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTLCLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. ; ww‘wu—g W W3? %§/“m 2003 mw<q§§3§§a) T Tar; Hm swam 37‘s? mm ws‘ta gm % 33W! m SE Hgl‘E’BLE $‘P‘RI JUSTECE PRETINKER EIWA$ER 1?.G’129G9 Shri TK'T‘iwari Ounqa‘ Q +11? QFtitlo At the outset, counsel for the petitioner wants to Withdraw tha present petition with li'berty to fiie renresentatien bef re resncndent N02 raisina‘ his g“ievances aga nst the impugned tranSfer order dateci 29.062009 However, counsei for the petitioner submits that the Wife of the petitioner is also a Cove ‘nment servant and on account of the impugned transfer, order, the "emiiv tie of the aetttio‘ne“ wouid 3e ilisturbed. He submits that dirr otion ”Fax, be issued to the respondent No.2 for deciding his reoresent ti n so made expeciitiousiv. Counsei for the State 147s no objection if the representation is § made and the same is dehded by the aut 101ities concerned I exoeditiously. Accordingl‘ , the oet‘itioo is dismissed as Withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. In the eventuality of petitioner’s making such representation within a. oerioti of fifteen days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, the same Wouid be decided within a eeriod of three weeks from the date of its receipt. / 4 t Sd/— Pritinker Diwaker Judge 5(1/ ,r'r i