1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 906 of 2011 Date of Decision: 22.7.2011 *** Balwant Singh & Anr. .. Petitioners VS. Jaspreet Singh & Anr. .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND KUMAR, Present:- Mr. Dhirinder Chopra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. H.S. Dhandi, Advocate for respondents. *** ARVIND KUMAR, J. The present petitioners are defendants in the suit for injunction filed by respondent No.1 wherein a prayer has been made to restrain the petitioners and respondent No.2 from changing the nature of suit land by digging out the earth therefrom. Along with the suit an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 was filed, which was dismissed by the learned trial Court, but, on an appeal, the application of the plaintiff was allowed and the learned appellate Court below restrained them from digging out earth from the suit land till the disposal of the main suit. Aggrieved with the same, the petitioners-defendants have filed the instant revision petition. Heard. It is evident from records that in respect of suit property the plaintiff has also filed a suit for specific performance claiming that vide agreement dated 16.9.2005 the defendants entered into an agreement to sell the suit land, but lateron failed to perform their part of contract. During the course of arguments, there had been a consensus 2 between the counsel for the parties that whatever is the situation at site, they will keep the same intact and will not change the nature of suit land. In view of this, the impugned order passed by the appellate Court is modified to the extent that the parties will maintain status qua over the suit property till the disposal of the suit. However, the trial Court is directed to expedite the disposal of pending suit and dispose it of preferable within four months. With the aforesaid modification, the instant revision petition stands disposed of. (ARVIND KUMAR) JUDGE July 22,2011 Jiten