IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO. 578 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 578 OF 2008 PETITION NO. 578 OF 2008 M/s. Piyu Developers Pvt. Ltd. ] .. Petitioners Versus 1. The Chief Executive Officer, Slum ] Rehabilitation Authority & 9 ors. ] .. Respondents Mr. M.A. Burud i/b A.K. Chauhan for the petitioners. Mr. J.G. Reddy for the respondent No.1. Mr. N.A. Shaikh for the respondent No.3. Ms. Manjusha Kumbhar for the respondent No.7. CORAM: S.B. MHASE & A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATED: 23RD JUNE, 2008 P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel. 2. We find that the dispute which has been raised in this petition is within the purview of the High Powered Committee constituted in view of the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Writ Petition bearing No.1326 of 2007. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents also have no objection if the remedy of the High Powered Committee is opted by the petitioners. : 2 : 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that he desires to approach the High Powered Committee and, therefore, seeks liberty to withdraw the Petition. He, however, states that the High Powered Committee be directed to dispose of the matter within a stipulated time. 4. The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. We do not know how many matters are pending before the High Powered Committee and, therefore, we only observe that the High Powered Committee will dispose of the application filed by the petitioners as early as possible. If the petitioners desire to approach the High Powered Committee they shall do so within a period of 8 days from today. 5. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- [A.A. [A.A. [A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.] KUMBHAKONI, J.] KUMBHAKONI, J.] [S.B. [S.B. [S.B. MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.] MHASE, J.]