IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2121 of 2009 KUMARI REKHA RANI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2 13/2/2009 Heard Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Grievance of the petitioner is that though on the basis of enquiry conducted by the D.C.L.R, the Collector has taken a decision to cancel the earlier appointments, his remaining part of the order for getting the fresh selection made vide his order dated 18.7.2008 is not being carried out. This Court would find that the earlier issue was being adjudicated by the petitioner before the Lokayuktya by filing complaint and thereafter certain directions were given to the Collector by the office of the Lokayuktya. Pursuant thereto a compliance report dated 18.7.2007 was filed. If that compliance report is in part satisfaction of the petitioner, remedy for the petitioner is to approach before the authority, namely, the Lokayuktya. This Court cannot 2 interfere with the order of the executing agency, namely, Lokayuktya. That being so, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to move the Lokayuktya for getting relief for the remaining part of the order of the Collector dated 18.7.2007. This Court, without expressing any opinion on such claim of the petitioner, would permit him to withdraw this application. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Abhay Kumar