( 1 ) WP 1831/11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1831 OF 2011 Madhav s/o Jangu Patil PETITIONER V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra and others RESPONDENTS Mr. R.T. Nagargoje, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. B.V. Wagh, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 Mr. P.K. Joshi, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE & A.V. NIRGUDE,JJ. DATED : 18th March, 2011 ORAL ORDER : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The main prayer made in the writ petition reads thus : "C. By issuing writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions, the respondent No. 3 Sangh may kindly be directed to decide the representation of the President of respondent No. 4 Sangh dated 1.1.2011 as early as possible." 3. Learned counsel for respondent No. 3 - Sangh, on instructions, submits that respondent No. 3 will consider and decide petitioner's application ( 2 ) WP 1831/11 dated 1st January, 2011, within a period of three weeks from today. His statement is accepted. In view of the statement made on behalf of respondent No.3, nothing further survives in the petition. It is needless to mention that while considering the petitioner's application, they shall follow the due procedure and decide it in accordance with Law. 4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. ( A. V. NIRGUDE,J. ) ( D.B. BHOSALE,J. ) SRM/