IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.955 of 2009 Ajay Kumar, son of Raje @ Raje Mistri …Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Shobha Rani, d/o Chandrika Prasad Sharma 3. Priyanka Rani D/o Ajay Kumar …Opposite parties ----------- 02. 27.06.2011 Petitioner is the husband and is aggrieved by order dated 30.4.2009, passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif in Maintenance Case No.22(M) of 2003, whereby on a consideration of materials brought on record by the parties the estranged wife(o.p.no.2) and daughter(o.p.no.3) were directed to be paid a sum of Rs.500/- each per month. The daughter was to get the maintenance amount till attaining the age of her majority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready and willing to live with his wife and daughter and to maintain them as per his capability. If that be the case, then the Code itself provides a remedy for modification/alteration/recall of the order. The petitioner may invoke the said jurisdiction of the court. Considering the amount of maintenance fixed under the impugned order this Court is not inclined to interfere therewith. The application is dismissed with the liberty aforesaid. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )