IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25886 of 2008 RAVI SHANKAR MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- Cr.Misc. No.25910 of 2008 BHAIRO MISHRA Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 22.7.2008. Ravi Shankar Mishra petitioner in Cr.Misc.No.25886 of 2008 is husband of the deceased and Bhairo Mishra petitioner in Cr.Misc.No.25910 of 2008 is father-in-law. They are apprehending their arrest in connection with Nanopur P.S.Case no.111 of 2007 registered for offence under Sections 498A 328, 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant is the father of the deceased. Counsel for the petitioners submits that F.I.R. itself indicates that Ravi Shankar Mishra was not present on the date of occurrence and he left for Mumbai 4-5 days earlier. So far petitioner no.2 is concerned there is no specific allegation against him. Marriage in between the daughter of the informant and Ravi Shankar Mishra was solemnized 13-14 years ago. In between this period there was no complaint either of torture or demand of dowry. The deceased being pregnant after 13-14 years and due to some pregnancy complication she died but the informant has instituted this false case. Considering the aforesaid fact prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. The petitioner namely Ravi Shankar Mishra of Cr. Misc. No. 25886 of 2008 and Bhairo Mishra in Cr.Misc.No.25910 of 2008 are directed to surrender before the S.D.J.M.Pupri within four weeks - 2 - from today and on their so surrendering they shall be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M.Pupari in connection with Nanopur P.S.Case no.111 of 2007 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Sss/- (Mridula Mishra, J)