HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. HON'BLE SHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRA, J. Writ Petition No,115 of 2006 Ku. Lalita Kishanpara, Versus t, S/o Horilal Rajak, Chantidih, Bilaspur 1. 2. 3. State of C.G., through Secretary, Deptt. of Home, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Superintendent of Police, Biiaspur (C.G.) Station House Officer, Sarkanda Police Station, Biiaspur (C.G.) Present: Shri Prateek Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Sunita Jain, Advocate as Amicus Curiae. Shri N.K. AgrawaS, learned Dy. A.G. Torthe State. ORDER (22nd February, 2008) The foiiowing order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Learned counsel for the parties are heard. This writ petition came to be registered on the communication received from one Ku. Lalita Rajak, alieging commission of offences against her and her family members by Jippy alias Tulsi Don Rajak, Manju, Bharat Rajak, Anil, Deepak & Dinesh, on different dates in the year 2005. 2. !n the return filed on behalf of the State it has been categorically stated that al! the persons named in the letter are close relatives of Ku. Lalita Rajak; on the report of Lalita Rajak about the —~irtcidentdated 15.3.2005, a case was registered at Crime Number 126/2tx)5 at Police Station-Sarkanda, District -Bilaspur for the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 294, 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC and the accused persons were chargesheeted in the said case before the concerned Magistrate; some reports were also lodged against Hiralal, father of Ku. Lalita Rajak by the persons named by her, in her letter. 3. As the police has already chargesheeted the accused persons in the case registered at crime number 126/2005 relating to the incident dated 15.3.2005 and the trial is pending before the concerning Magistrate, we are of the opinion that no further monitoring, now, is required in this writ petition. 4. The writ petition stands disposed of. J^ Sd/- clTefJustice Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge