IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2087 of 2009(O&M) Date of decision: 25.11.2009 Kamlesh Devi ......Petitioner(s) Versus Krishna Mohan and others ......Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. Umesh Narang, Advocate for the petitioner. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral) CM No.27610-CII of 2009 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. COCP No.2087 of 2009 The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that vide judgment dated 21.3.2009, CWP No.6044 of 2007 was allowed whereby the petitioner has been held entitled to assistance under the policy of 2006 on the ground that her husband had died on duty in service. Keeping in view that the question of law whether the policy prevalent at the time of death of an employee or for granting compassionate appointment/assistance or the policy prevalent on the date of consideration for giving compassionate appointment/assistance to the ward of such employee shall be applicable, is pending before a Larger Bench of this Court in CWP No.5335 of 2009, vide order dated 2.4.2009. In view of the aforesaid fact, at this stage, it cannot be said that the respondents have disobeyed the order passed by this Court, therefore, I am not inclined to take cognizance of this petition. Dismissed. November 25, 2009 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) ps JUDGE In view of the aforesaid, I am not inclined to take cognizance of this petition at this stage. Dismissed.