IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE SIDE SIDE SIDE SECOND SECOND SECOND APPEAL NO.291 of 1999 APPEAL NO.291 of 1999 APPEAL NO.291 of 1999 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders. orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Shri R.V.More for the Appellant. Shri B.R.Patil for the Respondent. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. : ABHAY S.OKA, J. DATED DATED DATED : 10th August, 2004. : 10th August, 2004. : 10th August, 2004. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties. The Courts below have recorded concurrent findings that the original Plaintiff has established that he being the son of Vithu is entitled to get 1/2 share in the suit proeprty. The Courts below have also recorded a finding that the original Defendant No.1 i.e. predecessor of the Appellant has failed to prove that the properities in respect of which the partition was claimed were not the joint family properties. 2. There is neither any perversity nor illegality in the findings recorded by the Courts below. No substantial question of law arises in the Second Appeal. Hence Second Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Judge. Judge. Judge.