IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31249 of 2009 CHANDRIKA RAM & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 11.9.2009 Heard Counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the State. Allegation against the petitioners is that petitioners came at the Informant’s Darwaja and started assaulting the informant. When his brother and nephew came to save him they were also assaulted. Direct and specific allegation of assault is against Chandrika Ram, Pawan Ram, Badri Ram. Considering this fact, the prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of all these petitioners,namely, Chandrika Ram, Pawan Ram and Badri Ram is rejected. Prayer for anticipatory bail on behalf of Petitioner nos. 4, Basant Kumar, 5, Hemant Kumat, 6, Saroj Ram and 7, Motilal Ram are allowed. Let them surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Deoriya P.S. case No. 23 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of - 2 - the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner nos. 1,2 and 3, namely, Chandrika Ram, Pawan Ram and Badri, whose prayer for anticipatory bail has been rejected will move for regular bail before the Court below and the Court below shall consider the case of the petitioners, without being prejudiced of the rejection order. (Mridula Mishra,J.) A.Kumar