IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10958 of 2008 Date of decision: January 20, 2009 Inderjit Singh Kuleria ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & another ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Ms. Promila Nain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana. *** 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in the first instance as per the written statement some alternative arrangement has been made at Palwal. However, she states that the petitioner would join at Palwal after the end of current academic session. Consequently, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider whether the petitioner is required to go to Palwal or not. In case it is felt that transfer is still required, this order may be reiterated and the petitioner may be allowed to join the new place of posting after the current academic session. The writ petition is disposed off. January 20, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) sonia JUDGE