THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.7097 of 2005 Date : 31-8-2010 Between : Sri Siddartha Weaker Sections Welfare Association, Represented by its President V.Chandra Reddy .. Petitioners and another and The Director of School Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioners : Sri Seetharam Chaparla Counsel for respondents : A.G.P. for School Education The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.7097 of 2005 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for multiple reliefs as shown in paragraphs (a) to (e) in the prayer portion of the Writ Petition. However, at the hearing Sri Seetharam Chaparla, the learned Counsel for the petitioners, fairly stated that for the present, the petitioners are intending to press only the reliefs (a) and (e) which are as follows: (a) direct the respondent No.1 to 3 to complete the enquiry pending pursuant to the letter L.Dis.Rc.No.2840/B4-2/2003, dated 26-8-2003 on the file of 1st respondent L.Dis.Rc.No.8064/A3/2003 dated 20-11-2003 on the file of 2nd respondent and L.Dis.Rc.No.2063/HNR/2004 dated 19-7-2004 on the file of 3rd respondent and pass final orders with regard to the right of the petitioners in respect of petitioners Association viz., Sri Siddartha Weaker Sections Welfare Association and petitioners school viz., Sri Siddhartha Public School/Sri Siddhartha High School, at Banda Maisamma Nagar, Near Indira park, Hyderabad. (e) direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the case of the petitioners for according permission to transfer the petitioners school from premises No.1-2-606/181, Banda Maisamma Nagar, Near Indira park to New Ambedkarnagar, New NTR Stadium, Near Indira park, Hyderabad. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education stated that the enquiry initiated by respondent Nos.1 to 3 was already held and that no final order has been passed therein. In the proceedings dated 3-12-2004, it is informed that in view of the disputes between the petitioners and 4th respondent pending in Civil Court, the Department cannot interfere in the matter at this stage. Inasmuch as the representation dated 31-7-2003, on which the said order dated 3-12-2004 was issued, pertain to the Correspondent of the petitioners’ school and enquiry was already stated to have been completed, the petitioners’ representation requires reconsideration after a final order was passed in the enquiry already held. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to pass final order in the enquiry said to have been already completed, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioners and respondent No.4. It is needless to observe that the parties are entitled to approach respondent No.1 for appropriate relief depending upon the result of the final order to be passed by respondent No.1. No costs. ________________________ Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Date : 31-8-2010 AM