IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.2443 of 2011 BINOD PANDEY, SON OF LATE BHIMAL PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 08.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner seeks his bail in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 67 of 2010 registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Although, petitioner is named in the First Information Report but it appears from perusal of contents of Ferdbeyan of the informant that she is not an eye-witness of the alleged occurrence. Moreover, the only allegation against the petitioner is that he accompanied the other accused while the deceased was being taken away by them. The impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge discloses that petitioner along with other accused were seen fleeing away from the place of occurrence just after the alleged occurrence and apart from the aforesaid materials there is nothing against the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Arrah in connection with above stated Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 67 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )