IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1209 OF 2000 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1209 OF 2000 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1209 OF 2000 The Commissioner of Income tax, Mumbai City V, Mumbai ...Appellant V/s. Procter & Gamble India Ltd. ...Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta i/b. M/s.R.N. Bandopadhyay for the Appellant. Mr.P.J. Pardiwala i/b. M & M Legal Venture for the Respondent. CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. DATED : JUNE 23, 2008 DATED : JUNE 23, 2008 DATED : JUNE 23, 2008 P.C. :- P.C. :- P.C. :- . It is stated that the revenue effect in the present appeal is covered by the C.B.D.T. Circular. In view of this, learned Counsel for the department does not press this appeal. . Appeal is disposed of as not pressed. CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE CHIEF JUSTICE V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J. V.M. KANADE, J.