Crl. Misc. No. M-1989 of 2009 Rajesh Saini @ Pappu and another vs. State of Haryana Present: Mr. N.S.Shekhawat, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Sidharth Sarup, AAG, Haryana. **** The following order was passed by this Court on 10.2.2009:- “Learned counsel for the State submits that some dowry articles were required to be recovered from the petitioners. Accordingly, list again on 1.4.2009. In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioners be admitted to interim bail subject to their furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. However, they shall join the investigation as and when called and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.” Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Sube Singh, has submitted that the petitioners have joined investigation and are not required for further investigation. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the order granting interim bail dated 10.2.2009 is made absolute. (SABINA) JUDGE April 01, 2009 anita