IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN THURSDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2011 / 3RD CHAITHRA 1933 OP(C).No. 1190 of 2011(O) -------------------------------------- OS.NO. 312/2000 of MUSNIFF COURT, ADOOR .................... PETITIONER/3RD DEFENDANT: --------------------------------------------- VARGHESE CHACKO, VENGA VILA THEKKETHIL, KUNNIDA, KURUMBAKARA P.O., (VIA) PATHANAPURAM PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689 695. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAKESH ROSHAN SMT.THUSHARA.V RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. LAKSHMI KUTI AMMA, KIZHAKKEDATHU VEETTIL KUNNIDA, KURUMBAKARA P.O., (VIA) PATHANAPURAM, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689 695. 2. THANKAMANI AMMA, KIZHAKKEDATHU VEETTIL, KUNNIDA, KURUMBAKARA P.O., (VIA) PATHANAPURAM, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689 695. 3. GOURI KUTTY AMMA, KIZHAKKEDATHU VEETTIL, KUNNIDA, KURUMBAKARA P.O., (VIA) PATHANAPURAM, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689 695. 4. RADHA MANI, KIZHAKKEDATHU THEKKATHIL VEETTIL, KUNNIDA, KURUMBAKARA P.O., (VIA) PATHANAPURAM, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689 695. 5. SUDHA DEVI, D/O.PONNAMMA, KIZHAKKEDATHU VEETTIL, KUNNIDA, KURUMBAKARA P.O., (VIA) PATHANAPURAM, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689 695. 6. RADHA MANI AMMA, W/O.VIJAYAN PILLAI, KIZHAKKEDATHU VEETTIL, KUNNIDA, KURUMBAKARA P.O., (VIA) PATHANAPURAM, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689 695. O.P.(C)NO.1190/2011 7. VIJAYAN PILLAI, S/O.PONNAMMA, KIZHAKKEDATHU VEETTIL, KUNNIDA, KURUMBAKARA P.O., (VIA) PATHANAPURAM, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689 695. 8. OMANA AMMA, D/O.SARASWATHI AMMA, KRISHNA MANGALATH, KUNNIDA, KURUMBAKARA P.O., (VIA) PATHANAPURAM, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689 695. 9. KUNJI PENNU, VENGA VILA THEKKETHIL, KUNNIDA, KURUMBAKARA P.O., (VIA) PATHANAPURAM, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689 695. 10. LAKSHMI KUTTY, VENGA VILA THEKKETHIL, KUNNIDA, KURUMBAKARA P.O., (VIA) PATHANAPURAM, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689 695. BY THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts P.BHAVADASAN, J. ------------------------------------- OP(C) No.1190 of 2011 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of March 2011 Judgment This OP will have to fail on a short ground. The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the remand order in AS No.117/04 dated 11.10.2007. The petitioner submits that he is not a party to the proceedings. Even if that be so, his remedy is to file an appeal with leave against the impugned order. Whatever that be, this OP is not maintainable in law. Accordingly, it is dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedies before the appropriate forum. P.Bhavadasan, Judge sta 2