THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD C.M.A. No. 2619 of 2001 Oral order: (Per N.V. Ramana, J.) The appellant, who is the husband, ﬁled this appeal questioning the order and decree dated 30.11.2000 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Puttur, dismissing petition in O.P. No. 19 of 1998, ﬁled by him seeking dissolution of his marriage with the respondent-wife. The matter was adjourned on several occasions. On one occasion, we directed the parties to appear for re- conciliation. As the parties did not appear for re- conciliation, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. Accordingly, today the appeal is listed under the caption “for dismissal”. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in spite of his taking out notice to the appellant, the appellant in spite of receiving the notice, the appellant neither contacted him nor gave him any instructions. It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter. Hence, we dismiss the C.M.A. for non-prosecution. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. _____________________ P. DURGA PRASAD, J. Dated: 07th December, 2011 KSR