-!; HIGHeOURTOFCHHAmSGARHATBILASPUR DB: Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra & Hon'bleShriRMChandrakar.JJ. Petitioner Respondents Wrif Petition fCl No. 5573 bfZOIO Vikram Singh Thakur, S/o Indrajeet Singh Thakur, aged about 31 years, R/6 Kawardha Road, Pandaria, Distt. Kawardha Vs. 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through - its Secretary, Rural Engineenng Services, D.K.S.BhawanRaipur,Distt.Raipur(C.G.) 2. Engineer in Chief Rural Bigineering Services Dspari:nient. Civil Lines Raipyr, BesideRajbhawanChhattisgarh 3.ChiefEngineer,RyralEngineeringServices Department, DMsion Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham(C.G.) ' 4. Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Services Department, Division Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G^ WTJt^etyron_underArticte226oftheCohstitution6flndia Present: : : . . ' ; .' :. ; ! , ' . ; : :' Shri P.S. Koshy with Shri Vaibhav Shukla, counsel for ttte petitioner.^ ,^,. ;: ':;.. ^.: '• • ;':',. ..:. . 1'' Shri U.N.D. Deo.Govt. Advocate fbr the State. ORAL ORDER (Passedbn28t"September,2010) PerDhttendraMts^e.J Heard. ' 1. The petitioner has filed this petition and prays for direction to tiie respondente tp permit the petitioner td partieipate in the tender prpcess, which was commenced by the respondents vide public notiee of Annexure P-2. / A^: i^s'SaB^^S^^S^a ir'•UfljB^BB^^nid ItNT"' •' iriiiir'i f ' ' '>. ^ Vija' 2. Grievance of the petittoner is that.he applied fpr issuance of tenderform in response to the tender notice (AnnexureP-2) and deposited Rs. 750/- with the respondent. Howeyer, the respondent did not issue tender form and thereby petitioner has been deprived from participating in the tender process. The petitioner is otherwise qualifled andeligibleto participate in the tender process as per theconditions mentioned in the tender notice of Annexure P-2. 3. TO an specific query whether any reeeipt has been filed bythe petitioner of Rs. 750/-, deposited for purchase of tender form, learnedcounsel for the petitioner submits that no such receipt has been filed alorig with the petition., • : : . : ^ :; ! , ; : ' . : 4. Wealsohoticethatthepetitionerhasnotfiledanydocumenttashowthat he approached th& respohclent/authority against non issuance of the tender form eyen after depositing of Rs. 750/- i.e. ttle cost of the tender form. • ' ! • ;;: • : 5. Thus, in the absence ofany material 6n recprdtoshpwthatthepetitioner applied to the respondents for issuahce of tender form and any c K*l'h'<~> I/ representation for demand of justice, we ctecline to entertain •this and • dismiss the same at the admissipn stage itself without notice to the other side. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge Sv^af^S^^^sw^viKfQf^sw^w. s^^ ! lllilll i ! 1 lill ;! I: w .1tn:B