IN THE HIGH CQURT DF CHHATI‘ISGARH AT BILASPUR wmvermon No3'ZOé/2006 f PETITIONER : .. Sheela Shrivastava, D10 Shn' A %‘(' I. P. Vm'ma, Aged abcut 44 e39 \o" /' years, Supmvisor in Integated ”‘E‘ 3} Child Developnvent Services, Baloda, District Janjgr (3mm «‘65 b - Vm RESPONDENIS : 1. State of Gmttisgmh, through Wary, Depaxtment of Women and Child Developntm Mantralaya, a‘mstti Chnwh Raipur (CG). Derpmy Director (Estzbijshmem) Women and Child Development Raiprur (CG). Timid Pmgmmme Officer, Women and Child DEveloptmant, Mair Champa, mstn'ct— Ianjgn'x Chanpa (CG). Project 0mm megmted mm Developmmt Project, Baloda, District—Ianjg'r (CG). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2 6 27 OF THE CONSTITUTIGN OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS PROHIBITION CERTIORARI ETC.OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER, Details of the petiiion. TL PARTICULAR OF THE PETHKONER As per cause htle f 23 HIGH COURT OF CHHA’ITISGARH AT BILASPUR ! Writ Pen'tion No. 3706 of 2003 . 'Sheela Shrivastava Pe11'tioner Versus Respondents State of Chhattisgarh an others Single Bench : Hon’blc Mr. Jush'ce Satish K. Agihotti. Shn‘ Ali Asgar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Panel lawyer for the Iespor'yge'hts. “f ORAL ORDER ( 22nd February, 2006) The following order of the Court was passed by Satlsh K. Agilmtri, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that the petitioner wants to Withdraw this petition as this petition has become infructuous, to which learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. . Sd/u Satish’ K. Agnihom ,s Judge a( Thakur