1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 911 OF 2004. Shri Mario Cotta Pereira, Margao, Goa. .... Applicant. Versus State of Goa through its Chief Secretary and Others. .... Respondents. Shri F.M. Reis, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri L.M. Gajinkar, Advocate for the Respondents No.4, 9, 10, 17 to 22, 27, 29, 30, 34, 37 and 41. CORAM: DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & N. A. BRITTO, J. DATE: 21 st MARCH, 2005. P.C.: Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection if the application is allowed. Consequently the application is allowed, and consequently respondent No.35 is deleted from the array of parties and the applicant would be at liberty to bring on record the legal representatives of respondent No.35. The applicant has already placed on record the names and addresses of the legal representatives of respondent No.35. They are taken on record and legal representatives of respondent No.35 are impleaded as respondents. 2 2. Learned counsel for the applicant undertakes to issue notice to the newly added respondents, within a week from today. Newly added respondents would be free to file reply to the Petition within four weeks of service. 3. This application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE sl. N.A. BRITTO, J. .