IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1259 along with CWP Nos. 1260, 1261, 1262 and 1272 of 2011 Date of Decision : March 22, 2011 1. CWP No. 1259 of 2011 Gian Singh vs. HRTC 2. CWP No. 1260 of 2011 Harvir Singh vs. HRTC 3. CWP No. 1261 of 2011 Kushal Singh vs. HRTC 4. CWP No. 1262 of 2011 Bhupinder Singh vs. HRTC 5. CWP No. 1272 of 2011 Ashok Anand vs. HRTC Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Surinder Thakur vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Verma, Advocate. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) These writ petitions are filed with the identical prayers, one set of such prayers is as follows:- “(a) To issue a writ of mandamus, appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, directing the respondent 2 Corporation to consider and promote the petitioner with all the consequential benefits to the post of Inspector w.e.f. 27/09/2008, when the incumbents junior to the petitioner were considered and promoted by the respondent Corporation with all the consequential benefits and arrears along with interest thereon 18% pa;” 2. Annexure P-1, notice has already been served on the respondent. There will be a direction to the respondent to look into Annexure P-1 and take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner concerned. While taking action in the matter of promotion, it is made clear that any promotion, if made in the meanwhile, will be subject to the decision thus taken by the respondent. 3. With the above observations, these petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending applications(s) if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. (Justice Sanjay Karol), Judge. March 22, 2011 (PK/Pankaj)