WP(C) 5098/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA I have heard Ms. P. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. M. Baruah, learned counsel representing Mr. J. Singh, learned Standing coun sel, Railways. The matter relates to the claim of the petitioner to continue in service under t he respondents till 28.02.2019. According to the petitioner, he has been made to retire prematurely. In paragraph-5 of the writ petition, the petitioner has made a statement regarding his approach to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Guwahati Bench b y way of filing OA No. 91/2010. However, there is no disclosure as to the outcom e of the said OA. On being asked, learned counsel for the petitioner has produce d a copy of the judgment and order dated 22.07.2010 passed by the learned Tribun al dismissing the OA. In view of the aforesaid position, it will be open for the petitioner to make a challenge to the said judgment and order passed by the learned Tribunal instead of filing an independent writ petition making the same prayer as was mad e before the Tribunal. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for a liberty to file a fresh w rit petition making a challenge to the said order of the Tribunal. Considering the matter in its entirety, the prayer so made is allowed. T he writ petition is dismissed. It will be open for the petitioner pursue such legal remedy as may be av ailable to him in law.