1 Review Appln [Writ] No.131 of 2010 S.NAGAMUTHU.J., This review application has been filed seeking to review the order passed by this court on 30.07.2009 in W.P.No.16789 of 1994. The dispute in this writ petition is in respect of lands belonging to the petitioners. It is the admitted case that originally the petitioner owned 78.33 Acres of land comprised in Old S.No.2693/2 at Derisanamcope Village, Kanyakumari District. It is also the admitted case that out of the said extent, 0.30 Acres of land was taken over by the Government for Perunchani Reservoir purpose. Thus, it is the admitted case that the petitioners now own 78.03 Acres of land. During the year 1963 to 1966, resurvey was undertaken in the village. During which the old S.No.2693/2 was assigned with a new survey number R.S.No.604/2 part. 2. When the writ petition came up before this court on the earlier occasion, it was submitted by the learned Government Advocate that the entire extent of 78.03 Acres of land for which the petitioners have got title lies exclusively in R.S No.604/2 part . It was also reported to this court that the land in S.No.604/4 has got nothing to do with the lands belonging to the petitioners. Now, the petitioners have come up 2 with this review application that 78.03 Acres of land belonging to the petitioners lies both in R.S.No.604/2 (part) as well as 604/4. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners has produced a report of the 4th respondent wherein it is so stated. 3. In my considered opinion, since the dispute is in a very narrow compass, it is necessary to find out as to whether the petitioners' land measuring 78.03 Acres of land exclusively lies in re suvey No.604/2 or it lies in S.Nos.604/2 as well as 604/4. In order to ascertain the same, the respective lands need to be measured and the same are to be correlated to old S.No.2693/2 and new S.Nos.604/2 and 604/4. 4. At this juncture, the learned senior counsel Mrs.Nalini Chidambaram submitted that in order to ascertain the said fact an Advocate Commissioner may be appointed suo motu by this court with a direction to him to measure the respective properties and to submit a report as indicated above. 5. The learned Government Pleader would, however, submit that the petitioners' land measuring 78.03 Acres lies exclusively in S.No.604/2 part and the land in S.No.604/4 does not belong to the petitioners and it belongs to the reserve forest. However, he has got 3 no objection for appointing an Advocate Commissioner to measure the properties and to submit a report. 6. In my considered view to resolve the simple dispute as indicated above and to avoid multiplicity of litigations, I deem it appropriate suo motu to appoint an Advocate Commissioner, who has got rich experience in the field to measure the respective properties and to correlate the same with the revenue records. The Commissioner shall be assisted by a qualified surveyor to be nominated by the District Collector, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil, The Advocate Commissioner shall measure the properties after giving due notice to both the parties and submit a report. The Advocate Commissioner's fee shall be borne by the petitioners. The learned senior counsel submitted that the petitioners are prepared to pay Rs.50,000/- [Rupees Fifty Thousand only] as initial fees for the Advocate Commissioner. The said submission is also recorded. 7.Accordingly, Mr.R.Mohandoss [Cell Phone No. 9443366150], Advocate and the former Register [Judicial], Madurai Bench of this Court, residing at No. J2C, Krishna Emerald Heights, 4th Main Road, Jaichandran Nagar, Pallikaranai, Chennai 600 100, is hereby appointed as Advocate Commissioner, who shall measure the properties as indicated above, correlate the same with the revenue records and 4 submit a detailed report. The District Collector, Kanyakumari, shall nominate the District Surveyor to assist the Advocate Commissioner to enable him to measure the properties as indicated above. The Advocate Commissioner's initial fee of Rs.50,000/- [Rupees Fifty Thousand only] shall be paid by the petitioners directly to the Advocate Commissioner. The Advocate Commissioner shall submit his report as directed above within a period of eight weeks from today and the Registry shall thereafter list this matter. 06.03.2015 kmk 5 S.NAGAMUTHU.J., kmk Review Apln. [Writ] No.131 of 2010 06.03.2015