IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.368 of 2002 Dhananjay Kumar, son of Bankey Sharma, resident of village- Kanhaiyachak, P.S.-Kinjar, District- Jehanabad Versus State of Bihar ----------- 4. 30.08.2011 The accused petitioner has preferred this revision application under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 against the order dated 18.03.2002 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Patna in Criminal Appeal No.46/2002 by which the prayer of the petitioner for setting aside the order dated 11.02.2002 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City in Alamganj (Agamkuan) P.S. Case No.245/2001 under Section 408 of the I.P.C. refusing to release him on bail under Juvenile Justice Act has been rejected. It appears from the impugned order that the appellant has not been held juvenile and his age has been assessed as 20 years at the time of remand and due to his criminal antecedent, his prayer for bail has been rejected by the learned Magistrate as well as by the learned Sessions Judge. A report was called for regarding the status of the case. It has been reported by Sri R.K.P. 2 Bharti, learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist class, Patna City vide letter no.12 dated 2.02.2010 that the accused petitioner has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No.18789/02. The other accused have also been granted bail. The case was fixed for framing of charge, but the charge has not been framed due to the absence of the accused including the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances, this revision application is dismissed as infructuous. V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)