IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 25TH JANUARY 2007 / 5TH MAGHA 1928 WP(C).No. 2895 of 2007(T) ------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------------- SHORNUR KURIES(P) LTD SREE MUTHAPPAN COMPLEX, SHORNUR P.O REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR O.P. UNNIKRISHNAN BY ADV. SRI.K.A.SREEJITH RESPONDENTS: --------------------- 1. THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM THRISSUR 2. SUHAIL (MINOR) REPRESENTED BY FATHER RAHMAN, S/O MUHAMMED, THOTTIVALAPPIL, PAINKULAM P.O CHERUTHURUTHY. BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI. I.V.PRAMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR.J ------------------------------------------ W.P.(C). No. 2895 OF 2007 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of January 2007 JUDGMENT The Writ petition is for a direction to the Consumer Redressal Forum not to enforce the Ext.P1 award until the disposal of the application to set aside the ex-parte award filed by the petitioner On going through Ext.P1 I find that the petitioner has filed a counter affidavit and later did not choose to appear before the Foum. The Fourm necessarily proceeded with the matter and passed final order. Since a detailed order is written, I do not think that the petitioner is entitled to any relief as prayed for. However if the petitioner deposits the amount in terms of the award before the C.D.R.F, the C.D.R.F will dispose of the petitioner's application before releasing payment to the beneficiary. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE es