CWP(T) No. 5069/2008 22.04.2010 Present: Mr. B. N. Mishra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Raj Kumar vice counsel for the respondent. According the learned counsel for the petitioner, he has no instructions to pursue the matter. The petitioner in effect is seeking that the Policy decision taken by the respondent-University in reducing the qualifying period of service in terms of Notifications dated 25.7.1989 and 22.10.1992, be quashed. The respondent in its reply has disclosed the sufficiency of the need and also the rationality in arriving at its decision. It is a Policy decision and there is no arbitrariness, unreasonableness or any irrationality attached to the same. The decision has been taken in public interest to enhance the standard of excellence in the respondent-University. The decision taken is in the over all interest of the employees. Hence, no ground for interference is made out. The petition is dismissed as such. ( Sanjay Karol ), Judge. April 22, 2010 (rana)