IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5217 of 2010 DEO SHARAN SINGH YADAV SON OF LATE KARAMDHARI SINGH YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHHATAUNI, P.S. NAILI NIMCHAK BATHANI, DISTRICT GAYA. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER AGRICULTURE, BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-COLLECTOR, GAYA. 3. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GAYA. 4. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NIMCHAK BATHANI, GAYA. 5. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, ATARI, GAYA. 6. SUMESHWAR PRASAD SON OF KAPILDEO SINGH RESIDNET OF VILLAGE GOPALGANJ, P.S. ISLAMPUR, DISTRICT NALANDA. ----------- 2 26/03/2010 Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. There is long drawn battle going on between the present petitioner and respondent no. 6. One such matter had travelled to this Court earlier which was C.W.J.C. No. 9723 of 2009. The matter was heard and disposed of in terms of the order contained in Annexure-10. Thereafter the Sub- divisional Magistrate has issued an order contained in Annexure- 11-A which is dated 10.3.2010. From perusal of the writ application and Annexures 11 and 11/A, it is evident that Annexure-11-A has been - 2 - issued on the basis of the earlier adjudication made by this Court taking into consideration the earlier litigation between the parties who had approached this Court at one stage or the other. Since Annexure- 11/A is as a consequence of judicial adjudication made by this Court earlier, the Court has difficulty in accepting the submissions made by the learned Senior Counsel that it requires interference afresh because it is coming in the way of his interest. The writ application has no merit. It is dismissed accordingly. AMIN (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)