1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Civil Writ Petition No.6789 of 2005 Sharad Mangesh Parulkar & anr. Petitioners Vs. Mrs.Sudha Vithal Kini & ors. Respondents With Civil Writ Petition No.1668 of 2006 With Civil Application No.1616 of 2006 Sharad Mangesh Parulkar & anr. Petitioners Vs. Dr.Manohar Shankar Kelkar & ors. Respondents Mr.V.B.Naik for petitioners. Mr.A.N.Thakore i/b. Thakore Jariwala & Associates for resp.nos.1 to 4. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J. April 27, 2007. P.C. . In these petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution the judgments and orders rendered by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court dated 3rd August 2005 in Appeal No.131 of 2001 and dated 30th July 2005 in Appeal No.177 of 2001 have been brought in question. . During the pendency of these petitions the landlords and the tenants have negotiated for a 2 compromise and accordingly they have arrived at an amicable settlement. The terms of the said settlement have been reduced in writing as Consent Terms and placed before this Court. Both the parties are present before the Court and they have signed the Consent Terms along with their respective learned Advocates. They pray to take the Consent Terms on record and dispose off the petitions in terms of the said Consent Terms. . The Consent Terms are marked as "X" for identification. The writ petitions are disposed off in terms of the Consent Terms which are admittedly binding on the respective parties. . Civil Application No.1616 of 2006 does not survive and the same stands disposed as such. (B.H.qMARL