.abs IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3164 OF 2007 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : coram, appearances, Court’s Orders: Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar Orders: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.A.P. Mundargi i/b Mr.N.N. Patil for the applicant. Mr.K.V. Saste,A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 20TH NOVEMBER 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Mundargi for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicant is charged under sections 302, 504, 506 and 120-B of I.P.C. and section 25 of the Arms Act. Application made by the applicant before the learned Sessions Judge has been rejected by a well reasoned order (Exhibit-A to the application). 3. Learned A.P.P. states that there are eye witnesses who had witnessed the crime. Pant with blood stains was - 2 - recovered from the house of the accused. The evidence on record prima facie connects the applicant with the crime. In the circumstances, looking to the gravity of the offence, it would not be proper to grant bail to the applicant. I see no reason to take a view different than the view taken by the learned Sessions Judge. Application for bail is rejected. (D.G. KARNIK, J.)