u1si i S ob oni Ag bot 63 y5a’ V on r ho No alu c actory, ulln, Ralur Tahsd 85 D1st alpur ) followmg 1s mentlone n the order ‘as Tulsldas Aged abou 3 years So Basar hetan Golden Works Shop No 1 /s Ralpur; Ice Factor _ F‘afadl ulldlng, Ralu aSI 8E Dls alpur-(C G )( ‘ _esgonde‘h _ Plaintiff / s Ralpur Ice Factory, Reglster artnershlp ' m Through Managln am Lal R Agrawal Aged [about ears, S/o R Arawa ) eepak-R‘Agrawal Aged about 5 ears, o .r’awal A g A 2 nand RArawal ged about 5 ears So Arawa nl R Agrawa e ears o R Arawa lnod R Arawal Ae eas o rawa rarnod RAgraWal Aged about 4 , a i‘r PETrtr101§ UbXJARV‘TIeLEg'zror;CONSTITUTIOK‘or: _ p‘I’ i Par { k I KER A" ' artlcul o te etmoner ‘L I _ 14T Son /g) Shr ‘S ed "au éfs Own Glde Woks Sp 1 Rpr Ie F VBldg p t " R (C G d .. 1 t 5 / mal Owner — C 2, ,M y, h B pr ThI tt R Rt§ (st ' M ed P g R 75 y gl ’ D, 3 y S/ RAg y / R gl ul l Agd ' -_ y S/ gl V g gd yr S/ R Agl “VP 5 ‘ abWt 1,49 about 47 s f h P Present i Shn SS Rajput w1th Shn SK Tlwan Advocates for the i petmoner RESlio‘NDENTs : M/s Raipur Ice Factory & athers‘ Plaintlffs (WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONblll UTION OF INDL) (SB Hon'ble Mr N K. AgaréaL J ) Shn PK Tulsyan Advocate for respondents O DER (Passed on 01.04.201 1)? Thei‘instant petition filed under Article 227‘ of the Constitution of India dalls in question the legality and propriety of order dated. 08.12.2008, passed by the Vlth Civil Judge, Class I, Raipur, in Civil Suit No. 361-A/02, whereby the petitioner’s application for V l admitting document and for amendment of written statement hled under Order 8 Rule 1(A) and Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC respectively were diismissed. Brief fdcts 'of the case are that : respondents/plaintiEs instituted a. suit for eviction and arrears of rent against the tenant/petitioner— hereinJ According to the plaintiffs, theyare in bonafide need of suit premises. Duringi pendency of suit petitioner/defendant sought amendment in ( the written statement to incorporate the fact: plaintiffs sold shop No. x x n" \‘ RAL OR «N7 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Wm Pet1t1on (227) No 1014 of2009 PETITIONER : Tulsi Soni Defend‘ant ‘ VERSUS w l \w }tr 14 on§17.03.2008. By way of application unider Order 8 Rule 1(A) of CPC petitioner also sought admission of certifled copy of sale deed by which the above shop was sold 4, The trial court by order impugned dismissed the above applications . holding they are not relevant for dec1s1on oflthe suit 5. Havmg heard the counsel appearing for ihe parties and haying perused the order impugned 1n the consrdered opinion of this court the order impugned suffers from Jurisdicnonal rregularity warrantmg 1nterference of this court under Artrcle 227 of the Constrtutron of India In a suit for ev1cnon of tenant fled on the v ground of bonafrde need tenant may bnng such facts and documents ‘ on record to demolish plamtrffs bonafide need the amendment sought was therefore relevant For the reasons mentroned heremabove the petition deserVes to be and 1s hereby allowed order 1mpugned dated 08 12 2008 1s accordingly set asrde Petrtioner s apphcahon filed under Order \8 Rule 1(A) and Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC are allowed 7. The tr1al court rs drrected to allow the petltroner to incorporate the above; amendment 1n hrs written statement and thereafter shall proceed with the matter on its own merits in accordance with law. No order asto costs. .K.Agaml [l Judge San; u i”:t Na ‘