IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 16TH MARCH 2010 / 25TH PHALGUNA 1931 RP.No. 259 of 2010(D) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.19471/2009 Dated 18/02/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN W.P.(C): ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUBRAHMANYA BHAT.M,VOCATIONAL INSTRUCTOR IN CIVIL CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE,T.H.S & V.H.S.S.,MANCHA,NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. MR.ELVIN PETER P.J., SMT.POOJA SURENDRAN. RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS IN W.P(C): ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANATHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION,HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE PRINCIPAL,T.H.S & V.H.S.S,,MANCHA, NEDUMANGAD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE PRINCIPAL,GOVERNMENT VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,ERAVIPURAM,KOLLAM DIST. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. T.T. MUHAMMOOD THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P. No. 259 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of March, 2010 O R D E R This review petition is filed on the ground that certain benefits which the petitioners are entitled to in addition to the benefits granted by judgment in W.P. (C) No.9780/2008 in terms of which the writ petitions were disposed of has been omitted to be granted to the petitioner by the judgment dated 18.02.2010. The petitioner points out that in Annexure A1 judgment in W.P.(C) No.20431/2009 20926/2009, there was a further direction that if the petitioners are entitled to any benefit reckoning their provisional appointment, for fixation of pay on regular appointment, consequential benefits shall given to the petitioners. Petitioner seeks that benefit also in this writ petition. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case the last R.P. No. 259 of 2010 -2- sentence of the judgment dated 18.02.2010 in W.P.(C) No. No.19471/2009 would stand substituted by the following sentence: Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the judgment in W.P.(C) No.9780/2008 with a further direction that if they are entitled to any benefit reckoning their provisional appointment, for fixation of pay on regular appointment, consequential benefits shall given to the petitioners. The judgment in W.P.(C) No.19471/2009 would stand modified accordingly. S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE shg/