IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13641 of 2010 Date of Decision : August 03, 2010. A-One Builders .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Vinod Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner is a Construction Company who is said to have executed the works assigned to it by the respondent-Corporation from time to time. It is averred that the petitioner is entitled to be paid Rs.17,23,000/- for the works already executed and in relation to which the final bills have also been submitted by it. It is further averred that no payment is being released to the petitioner despite the directions contained in the Government Notification dated 15.8.2009, though it has already made a representation dated 15.4.2010 (Annexure P-3) followed by a legal notice dated 8.5.2010 (Annexure P-4) served upon the respondents. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, I deem it C.W.P.No .13641 of 2010 2 appropriate to dispose of the same with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the afore-mentioned representation dated 15.4.2010 (Annexure P- 3) as well as the legal notice dated 8.5.2010 (Annexure P-4) said to have been served on behalf of the petitioner and dispose of its pending claim by passing a speaking order, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Needless to say that if the petitioner is found entitled to any payment, the same shall also be released to it within the stipulated period. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. August 03, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE