1 v IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR rCHHATTISGARHI WRIT PETITION NO.'sf^J' /2006 'WtaLit^ PETITIONER ^,y^'/ Asy'y ^'.-••'c^''' ..-•'' o"..r'' <i>%••<^' ><%<^ /^^ "^Qny ^^' Manju Singh, W/o. Shri Gurjit Singh Mann, aged about 34 years, Occupation - presently posted as lady Constable no. 503, Police Line Surajpur, Police Surajpi-ir, Distt. Surguja (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS ^ .^•fWWS^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Home, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director General of Police, Police Headquarter, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Inspector General of Police, Surguja Range, 4. Superintendent of Police, Distt. Surajpur, Dist. Surguja (C.G.) ^ 5. Dev Narayan Constable No.286 6. Ajit Mishra, Constable No. 115 7. Rajesh Tiwari, Constable No. 187 8. Umesh Singh, Constable No.239 9. Revindra Singh,Constable no.288 ^-10. Ravindra Sahu, Constable No.81 /-II. Guru Prasad, Constable No.244 ^J-2. Rakesh Singh, Constable No.446 /-13. Manoj Singh, Constable No.447 ,.-14. Satyendra Singh, Constable No. 448 sas^^^^assBess .3. v JZ^ -,/• ^ty •-^ ----15. Sanjay Singh, Constable No.4'49 16. Brijesh Yadav, Constable No.451 ,,17. Sarfraj Ahmed, Constable No.452 /18. Pramod Pandey, Constable No. 453 From Respondent No. 5 to 18 are posted at Police line Surajpur, through Superintendent of Police, Surajpur. .^'^\^~'^>i\.v<^U ~3C^^ WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 2^/227 OF THECQNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUITABLEJVRIT, QRDERS OR DIRECTION. XI-HC-22 's'si -^ww^, dTfl'y'i^, fa'ni'yy MWWI Wflrai^..vj..^.po....4..^.^ -^ 200 fq^CT' an^r.^iT Tti-fi?b an^r sft^w •yfsa SD^I'^giwgfOT 4>J^41'1 'RTR^ff ^ f^st <r<i11^.1< ^? srfigiT aii^i Shri Rajesv Shrivastava, cojjnssi for ths petitioner. Shri Satish Gupta, De^ufy Gmt. Advocate for the Stats/— respondents N".1 to 4. Heard both the counsei. The case of the petitioner '4 Line Surajpur, District Sura.ipur i| constable on 5-10-91 and poste[3 Surajpur. in the year 2005, a conducted for the post of Heacj \ho is working as constable.in the Poilce ^ that the petitioner was appointed as |3 in ths Polics Line Surajpur, District sr\r\ft^arf^fi in tn^ c^mfa ^inri cpii uth<fh)'<wti»f'uiiiii It ) tl i'^rf •u'fatlllSi' uif (Sr t/^i' P^B Annexure-P/1, the order issued passlng'of the examination, th< she has not been seni for PP Q respcndents No.Sto 11 hereiR S^ The petitioner moved an appiicat| for sending her for PP Course. lr| the petliioner was not sent Tor moved another appjication on-'iq- fespondants No.StQ 18 hersin wh4 Lsarned counssi for ths instance the petitjoner may be all to the respondent No.2 and in turi|i the same at the eariiest to wiiich 4 has no objection. dtpartmenta! sromotion examination was Constabie 'A' ciass. The petitioner iclured 5 rank, which Is eyldent from Ifrom the Poiice Heaciquarters. Afier p^tiUoner was te send for P-P. course but ^yrs^ whsrsss, juniofs to th9 p^titlonsr javs already baen sent for PP Couree. |on before th®Superintendsnt of Police spite of the appiication dated 7-2-2006 pP Course. Thersafter, the petlttoner H-2006 wlth other 14 persons namely were iuniors to the petmoner- 1 petltlonsr sub.Tiittsd that In ths first ^iwed to make a detailed representatjon respQndent No.2 bs directed to dscsde ^arneci counsel for respondents No.1 te 'S^ •^Wlvii1, ^Tll'y'lti, Riwi'yy 3fl^?I'?iI h-v* ani^r . ?h^)i^ ^i^[ ,'a' •^- V;. ^. Ban»'e .iy 7-~. ^ 7 nra?(r a>-Hr<* 'M 200 fcKxisr' Having heard isarned count the facts and circumstencss of thd fos- the petjtioner is just, fair and ij aliowed to make a detaited repres^ period of 2 weeks and Jn turn, representation of the petjtioner wi^ receipt of representation, in an| gnevances rafseei by the petifioner,! yVith the dirsction aforesaid.l ConssquenSy, !V!.(W.)P. h] aiso stand disposedof. Panies are entitiea forccrtifi^ isi for is parties and havlng regard to cass, prayer maas by teamsd counse! [easonabie- Therefore, the petitioner is fcntat'on te the respondent No.2 wiihin a fespontienf No.2 is dfrectsd to decide }-iin another 2 months from the date of objective manner, after conside-ring lin accordance with iaw, " Ithe oetiSion stands disoosed of. 10.1856/200e an<i I.A. N0.4682/2006 +i'l<i<'i'fl-i MwcS ^ fs^t <r<iit$i< ^T 3]f;gn sn^T certifi^d copy offhis order. Sd/- L.C.Bhadoo Judge •'LL ^ f ^ 'VS Wi