1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.224 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.22 OF 2010 (Mukesh Rajeshrao Saktel ..vs.. State of Maharashtra) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.A. Sainis, Advocate h/f Shri A.A. Naik for the applicant, Smt. Nandita Tripati, APP for the respondent-State. CORAM : MRS. V.K. TAHILRAMANI AND M.L.TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATE : 02-05- 2011 . Heard learned counsel for the applicant-original appellant and learned A.P.P. for the respondent-State. Shri Sainis, the learned Counsel for the applicant- original appellant states that the papers have been taken from him by the father of the applicant by stating that he wants to engage another lawyer. The learned Counsel further states that he has also given no objection to the father of the applicant. Thus, it is prayed that the learned counsel be permitted to withdraw his Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the appellant in Criminal Appeal No.22/2010. Shri Ashish Chaware, learned Advocate states that he has instructions to appear in the matter. He undertakes to file Vakalatnama on behalf of the appellant within a week. Statement is accepted. In view of the above fact this application for withdrawal of Vakalatnama is allowed. JUDGE JUDGE pma