1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.02.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Criminal Original Petition (MD)No.1239 of 2011 P.Gomathi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector/District Magistrate, Office of the District Collector, Madurai District. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Madurai District. 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Samayanallur Range, Madurai District. 4.The Inspector of Police, Kadupatti Police Station, Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent No.3 to expeditiously complete the investigation in crime No.177 of 2010 on the file of the respondent No.4 and file charge sheet before the jurisdictional magistrate within the time stipulated by this Court, consequently, direct the respondent No.1 to provide relief amount to the petitioner. For Petitioner :Mr.R.Alagumani For Respondents :Mrs.S.Devasena, Govt. Advocate, Crl. Side O R D E R This petition has been filed to direct the respondent No.3 to expeditiously complete the investigation in crime No.177 of 2010 on the file of the respondent No.4 and file charge sheet before the jurisdictional magistrate within the time stipulated by this Court, consequently, direct the respondent No.1 to provide relief amount to the petitioner. 2.Heard Mr.R.Alagumani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs.S.Devasena, learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent State. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner, who is the defacto complainant has filed this petition seeking for an issuance of direction to the 3rd respondent to complete the investigation in crime No.177 of 2010 on the file of the respondent No.4 and for a direction to the respondent No.1 to provide the relief amount to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit in her argument that the case in crime No.177 of 2010 on the file of the 4th respondent has already been completed and charge sheet has also been filed before the jurisdictional magistrate, which was taken on file in P.R.C.No.31 of 2010 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti and the same has been committed to the Sessions Court, which was also taken on file in S.C.No.18 of 2010 and pending for disposal before the P.C.R.Court, Madurai. She would further submit that the relief amount has also been paid to the petitioner as per rule 12(4) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules 1995 and hence, she request the Court for dismissing the petition. 5.Considering the submission of the learned Government Advocate (criminal side), this Court could see that nothing survives in this petition and the same is liable to be dismissed as unnecessary. 6.Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed as unnecessary. SD DEPUTY REGISTRAR ( LA ) /TRUE COPY/ ASST REGISTRAR arul TO 1.The District Collector/District Magistrate, Office of the District Collector, Madurai District. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Madurai District. 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Samayanallur Range, Madurai District. 4.The Inspector of Police, Kadupatti Police Station, Madurai District. 5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 1CC TO MR. R.ALAGUMANI, ADVOCATE,SR: 4244: DM:2011:FEBRUARY:22::: Crl.O.P.(MD) No.1239 of 2011 02.02.2011 2P:7C:; https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/