IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5171 of 2004 DINESH DUBEY SON OF LATE BASUDEO YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KAHIRAVED, P.S. CHANARI, DISTRICT- ROHTAS AT SASARAM ---- PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ROHTAS AT SASARAM. 3. DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REFORMS ROHTAS, SASARAM. 4. SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, ROHTAS, SASARAM. 5. CIRCLE OFFICER, CHENARI, ROHTAS.—RESPONDENTS. ----------- 5/ 24-03-2011 Heard the parties. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the order dated 13-02-2001 passed by the Collector, Rohtas in Settlement Case No. 10 of 1998 (Annexure-6) is not being implemented by his subordinates. 3. In view of the order having been passed on 13.02.2001(Annexure-6), learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to approach the respondent- District Collector, Rohtas by filing an application before him, raising all the grievances, regarding non-compliance of the said order by his subordinates. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent District Collector, Rohtas by filing an application along with a copy of this order within a period of four weeks from today, where-after the District Collector shall be obliged to decide the petition filed by the 2 petitioner on merit in accordance with law within two months from the date of his appearance and filing of the representation by him. If the grievances raised by the petitioner are not redressed by the Collector, then the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach this Court by filing a fresh writ petition. 5. It is made clear that if the petitioner does not appear before the respondent- Collector within the time prescribed by this Court with a representation and a copy of this order, then it shall be construed that the present writ petition has been finally rejected by this Court. BTiwary/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)