@ $INGLE BENCfg W IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P.,,(S) N9. 9pm /2o11 WRIT UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF M INDIA 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: As per cause title. 2. PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS: As per cause title. Wm y PETITIONER: Heeralal Khusaro S/o Shri Hinchharam Khusaro, aged about 52 years, Presently working as Assistant Block EducatioKcfficer, Block— MasE’i‘ia Distt. Bnaspur ?}\\.\$ .‘ u“ ....... (C.G.) , ' Q‘e s...... $9 VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1. / State of Chhattisgarh Through: — Secretary, Department of Education Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (C.G.) T The District Education Officer, District -Bilaspur (C.G.) 3’ The Block Education Officer Block— Masturi Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) Joint Director, Treasury, accounts, pension, Bilaspur District-Bilaspur (0G,) HIGH 00m OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIIIARPUR SB : HOH’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRITIHKER DIWAKER w.p.1s) no. 5451/201 , PETITIONER Heeralal Khusaro Vet sus RESPONDENTS - Smte of C.G. & Othcxs RIT PETH‘IQN “NDER mmLE 39§1327 ¢F Mm WWITUTION INDIA Appearanee: Shri Ashwini Shukla, counscl for the pen’u'oners. ' . Shri Pravecn Das, Dy. G.A. for the State. om 01mm (15.09.2011) With the consent of the parh'cs, the matter is heald W. The peu'tioner was mmally appointed as Assistant Teacher on a Med pay of Rs. 150. Amr completion of his pmbah'on period, he was granted mgular pay scalo of Rs. 169-300. Learned counsel for the peu'tioner submits that the above issu has been consideted by the M.P. State Adminisuau've Tribunal, . Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 between Madhulcant Yadu and 5 others Vs. State of M.P. and othexs, whemin it was held that the similarly situated teachers am entitled to regular pay scale with ef&ct h‘om the date of initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Hon’ble Supteme Court. The appeal was dismissed by the Hon’bh Supreme Court upholding the decision of the 'l‘xibunal to the effect that the Teachers] Assistant Teachers axe entitled to regular pay scale nom the date of initial appointment. It is further submitted that this Court while considering the same issue in W.P. (S) No. 4725/2006 between Amar Saz' Ram & Others Vs. Sla1e of Chhaitisgarh wid Othevs by order dated 01.09.06 allowed the petitionexs to make a representan'on within a period of ten days, raising all the grievances. @a 1 W W e 6 @ Accordingly the petitiona' is grantsd liberty to make a rcprescntau'on raising all his grievances in the light of the afomsaid judgment anrl the circular dated 05.01.2011 (Annexure P/2), and in turn the concerned mspondent is directed to decide the representation, if any, in accordance with law, on its own merits, within a period of eight weeks Mm the date of receipt of the representation subject to veridcation of the facts. In view of the foregoing, this petition is disposed oi No order as to costs. r I Sd/— ‘ Pritinker Diwaker Judge