IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.26 of 2011 RAM BARAN SINGH, Son of Late Jaga Singh, Resident of Village Chadhua Tola, Barahkurwa, P.O. Turki, P.S. Kurhani, District Muzaffarpur. ………..Appellant Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.THE DIRECTOR, Primary Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.THE COMMISSIONER, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpaur. 4.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, Muzaffarpur. 5.THE INCHARGE HEAD MASTER, Primary School, Rampur Mani, Harijan Tola, Sakara, District Muzaffarpur. …………Respondents/Respondents ----------- 05/- 04-04-2011 The present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed against the order dated 06.07.2010 passed by learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No. 9004 of 2002 dismissing the writ application. The prayer of the petitioner appellant seems to be against the removal from service on the ground of submitting fake certificates of Matriculation and Teachers Training at the time of appointment and pursuant to the order passed on 18.06.2002 in Service Appeal No. 1/2002 by the respondent no. 3, Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur, contained in Memo No. 16 dated 05.01.2002. Perused the order of learned Single Judge, the appellant was taking different stands to the fact that he could pass Matriculation in the year 1970 and also 1971 as a private candidate. On verification from Bihar School Examination Board it was found that the Marks-Sheet of the Matriculation examination of the appellant seems to be forged one. It is also further opined by the Authority of the District Education Committee, after conducting inquiry that the Matriculation 2 certificate of the appellant in the year 1971 followed 1973 to be forged one. In view of the observations, the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition. We have also gone through the observation made by learned counsel and also of District Education Committee to the effect that the certificate of Matriculation and Teachers’ Training Certificates are forged. Under the above circumstances, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge. Accordingly, this Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. Rajeev/Praveen (T. Meena Kumari, J.) ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)