IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 4TH OCTOBER 2011 / 12TH ASWINA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 3370 of 2011() ------------------------- (CRIME 598 OF 2010 OF MULANTHURUTHY POLICE STATION) (CC.1760/2010 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, ERNAKULAM) .................... PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED 1 & 2 ---------------------------- 1. SHAJI V.T., AGED 33 YEARS, SON OF LATE THOMAS, VAYALATHUMPOTTAYIL HOUSE, CHOTTANIKKARA P.O, VATTAKUNNU,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. MARIYAMMA THOMAS, AGED 59 YEARS, WIFE OF LATE THOMAS VAYALATHUMPOTTAYIL HOUSE, CHOTTANIKKARA P.O, VATTAKUNNU, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BOBY MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): STATE & DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT ------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. JEENA POULOSE, AGED 28 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF POULOSE, ELAPPAMKATTIL HOUSE, PERUMPILLY P.O, MULANTHURUTHY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 314 R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. B. JAYASURYA R2 BY ADV. SRI. M.R.NANDAKUMAR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/10/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: BKA Crl.MC.No. 3370 of 2011() APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1: TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 598 OF 2010 OF THE MULATHURUTHY POLICE STATION. ANNEXURE A2: ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT DATED 19.02.2011 SWORN TO BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE BKA N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J. ---------------------------------------------------- Crl.M.C No. 3370 of 2011 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of October, 2011 ORDER The petitioners are A1 and A2 in CC No. 1760/2010 of JFCM I Ernakulam. The case was charge sheeted against them alleging offences under Section 498 A r/w 34 IPC. The defacto complainant thereunder is the second respondent before this Court who is represented by her counsel. It is submitted by both sides that the parties have settled the matter out of Court. An affidavit has been filed by the second respondent to the effect that the matter has been settled and that she does not want to prosecute the case. The dispute is purely personal in nature. In the light of the settlement arrived at this petition is allowed. Further proceedings in CC No.1760/2010 of JFCM I Ernakulam is quashed. Sd/- N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE jma //true copy// P.A to Judge