IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR MONDAY, THE 9TH JUNE 2008 / 19TH JYAISHTA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1563 of 2008() ------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 28/04/2008 IN IN CC.45/2002 IN CMP.874/2008 of ENQUIRY COMMR. & SPL. JUDGE, THRISSUR .................... REVN. PETITIONER: PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED ---------------------------------------- SIDHARTHAN KATTUNGAL, KATTUNGAL HOUSE THIRUVAMPADY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.B.RAMACHANDRAN RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ----------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.P. RAVINDRA BABU THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Crl.R.P. No. 1563 of 2008 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated: 09-06-2008 ORDER Petitioner who is the first accused in C.C. 45 of 2002 on the file of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Thrissur for offences punishable under Sections 409, 465 471 and 120 B I.P.C. and for an offence under Section 13 (1)(d) punishable Sec. 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, challenges Annexure A6 order dated 28-4-2008 passed by the Special Judge dismissing the petitioner's application for discharge. As a matter of fact, the Special Court had framed the court charge on 21-6-2007. It was thereafter that the petitioner filed C.M.P. 874 of 2008 seeking a discharge which was rightly dismissed as not maintainable. I am not entering on the merits of the case since the court charge is not challenged before me. I see no grounds to interfere with the order passed by the Special Judge. This Petition is accordingly dismissed. V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE) ani.