IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. CR.MISC.BAIL APPLICATION NO. 7902/2010 Tarendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of order : 19/8/2010. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ Shri G.S. Shekhawat for the petitioner. Shri Piyush Kumar, P.P. for the State. ****** Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that it is alleged that petitioner introduced Devilal, Banshi Lal, Hemraj, Meva Bai and Davendra Kumar to complainants Rajendra Banshal and Sunil Galav and on that basis the petitioner has been made accused in the FIR lodged by the complainant. Learned counsel submitted that the complainants have entered into compromise with the principal accused and on that count this Court was persuaded to grant anticipatory bail to co- accused Smt. Prem Bai and Bharat Kumar. Other co-accused Devilal and Hemraj have been enlarged on bail u/s 439 Cr.P.C. by the Court of Sessions. Petitioner's role can at the best be that of a mediator. Even otherwise, as per the FSL report, it has come on record that the signatures of Khatedars do not tally with the signatures on agreement to sell etc. According to the learned counsel, no criminal case, except this, was ever registered against the petitioners and that the matter stands compromised between the parties. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the submissions made at the bar, the nature of accusation against the petitioner, the materials collected so far during the course of investigation and all other facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant the indulgence of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. In the result, this bail application u/S.438 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Tarendra Singh @ ari Sardar S/o Guruvachan Singh in FIR No.80/2008, P.S. Kotwali, District Baran, he shall be released on bail by the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sureties of Rs.15,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions: - 1) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; 2) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and 3) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J. Thanvi