£5? $ILA§EM§R B mwgmé Ammimgg Ciaimani V» I. Nonexfar We agapegam Presem : EELE $HR§ Rii (3U?TA $J. & %‘§®N’§%§.§E $HR§ RM§E§E¥E§§€ $H£$§$Rf§$AR5 .k m Neg. ?3§§ a)? 2mm Rejtvi La§ Esaura, Slo Late Ugra$en Sam, aged abaui 3E: years, a’i Rm V§i§§ge aampai Kanakbira, Thaw am Tahs’zé Samngarh, Distt, Raigar'n wwam‘Mwager, MP. 8mm Ruad Transpsr’i Corporaimn Head Offiae Bhagai, Habéb Gang {MP} 2. Dem Manwér, 3;??SRICW £d38 Raigarh‘ 3. Baiya Lg: Verma, $Io Kaiiu Pra5a§ Varma, agezd abaut 4G yearg, C>ccugatéorz mimn MPSQTC Ragam thmugh Dam Manager, Fiaégarh {b: §3fabhamh $anaha§ak, Aahg $amnchna, Vikas Nigam Raigua” {CG}. R StEéie cfCG. Tmwgh CQEiec‘mr, Raigarh (CG) :w wig iwgmai w$ W3 m? 71m Mmm? Vahéswg imi‘ ’igkixi $hri Raan Pwsii, mungaé far respcndem NQA. R $2“ MewcE§5 23 QW a y V : . ‘ The following ox’der of the Court was passed by i Rajeev Gupta, CJ. None for the appenant. 2} As there is no representation on behalf of the appeiiani, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. l § 3) The appeal, therefore? is dismissed for want of prosecution. l i : l Sdl- = i Chief Justice l Subbu ; i i ~