IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2009 / 2ND MAGHA 1930 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 195 of 2009(D) ------------------------------ CRA.21/2008 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT, (ADHOC I), ERNAKULAM CC.1801/2005 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I, ERNAKULAM .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED: ----------------------------------------------------- V.H.SHIHAS, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O. V.A. HAMSA, PROPRIETOR, WELL-N-DONE AGENCIES, H.NO.5/1264, VALIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, COMPARAMUKKU, MATTANCHERRY, KOCHI - 2. BY ADV. SRI.BLAZE K.JOSE RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2. V.H.ABU, S/O. HUSSAIN, H.NO.6/1187, VALIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, STAR ROAD, KOCHI - 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.MUHAMMED PUZHAKKARA FOR R2 THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Kss M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. ------------------------------------------ CRL.R.P.NO.195 OF 2009 ------------------------------------------ Dated 222nd January 2009 O R D E R Revision petitioner is the accused and second respondent, the complainant in C.C.1801/2005 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Ernakulam. Revision petitioner was convicted and sentenced for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. He challenged the conviction before Sessions court, Ernakulam in Crl.A.21/2008. Learned Additional Sessions Judge on re-appreciation of evidence confirmed the conviction and modified sentence. Revision is filed challenging the conviction and sentence. 2. Learned counsel appearing for revision petitioner was heard. 3. Learned counsel submitted that the dispute was settled between the parties and in such circumstances, revision petitioner is not challenging the conviction or the sentence and seeks only three months time to pay the compensation. CRRP 195/09 2 4. In view of the submission revision is dismissed. Revision petitioner is granted three months time to pay the compensation. Revision petitioner is permitted to pay the compensation directly to second respondent and produce receipt and satisfy the Magistrate that compensation is paid M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE. uj.