1 APPR.358-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.358 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION [ST.] NO.526 OF 2010 Meena Santosh Sakate. .. Applicant. Versus Santosh Parshuram Sakate and 3 others. .. Respondents. .... Mr.Rananavare D.D. Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.P.B. Gujar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr.J.P. Kharge, A.P.P. for Respondent No.4­State. .... CORAM : A. R. JOSHI, J. DATED : 28th APRIL, 2011. P. C. : 1. Heard rival submissions for short on the present application for condonation of delay of 96 days in preferring Revision Application challenging the order of Sessions Judge, Satara dated 15th April, 2010. 2. The grounds for delay are mentioned in para­9 of the application – as to applicant/wife deprived of her matrimonial home, she not having source of income or livelihood, required to 2 APPR.358-10 take care of her small daughter, and not having money to come to Mumbai & engage a lawyer to prefer the Criminal Revision. Said grounds are accepted. Delay caused in preferring Criminal Revision is condoned by allowing the present Criminal Application No.358 of 2010. 3. Criminal Revision Application (stamp) No.526/2010 shall be numbered and kept for final hearing beyond vacation, to be taken on 14th June, 2011. Respondent/husband waives service in the said main Revision Application. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) PPD