E-HC—78 t^ 3:?i^?^?^i^ Wf ^H^'^TOF *3~^ ^1<41<^^ ^^^ 1^, "(iRI'ra^ **t*(Sf ^*rj^» l-^:-20€y: ^R^'q'^('^ilgq^) ^^RT?ftcr3^1 '^'rf^nft^ 'wi^ff ^f f^^t <F^i^i< ^ ^RTqSTf^T DIVISION BENCH: HON'BLEMRJ>HIR£NDRA MJCSHRA <& HON'BLE MR. bILIP RAOSAMEB bESHMUKH. JJ M.C.C-h ApDilcant Appellant/ befendant Non-aDDlicant Respondent/ plaitniff Smt.R^ W/o Loharc PS<& jijeshwari Bai, aged about 24 years, )ani PrakasFi Mishra R7o Sahaspur presently residing at Salik Jhitiya, |ah.Dongargoan, Rajnandgaon Vs Present: Mr. P.K.C. Tiwary, Sr. Advocat' for the applicant. Mr. Alok N'gam, Adv. for the ni 05.1.2009 Heard. The applicant has filed t^ (M) No.100/08 as the same wc^ on 1.12.2008 vide Annexure ^-^. The respondent has alre(Jidy caused his appearance. 10.415/2008 Dani P|"akosh Mishra,-aged about 27 (25) yearsJSon of Shri Oovind Prasad Mishra, residetit of Sahaspur Lohara, Police Station Sahas^ur Lohara, Tahsil and District Kabirc^am (C(5) ^ with Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate n-applicant. is application for restoration of FA dismissed for want of prosecution '-HC—78 ^n^i^ R'ljob ^^STT^-^NF ^^ v^mw^^^^^^^^^. NINdE ^WG|» !"^^0 ^Ti^T Tra"^' (^t^^f^)- ^^R 'Hf^T 3H^T ? ^Hl^ll ^Ff^ ^f f^^ 1:NX^>R '^o:rf^H3^I Mr. Nigam/ learned courjsel appearing for the respondent opposes the prayer. However, taking into con^ideration that the application was filed immediately after receip1| order and further consideriijig the reasons assigned in the application for non-appearance ^n 1.12.2008, which is also supported by theaffidavitof counsel for|the appellant, we are satisfied that the appellant has establishe|j sufficient cause for his non- appearance on 1.12.2008. Accordingly, the applicat is restored to its original numbejr. Certified copy as per rul^js. Sd/- DhirendraMishra Judge | of certified copy of the dismissal bn is allowed and FA (M) No.100/08 Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge