IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 20138 of 2010 Surjit Singla .....Petitioner VERSUS Harbans Singh Dhillon ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: None. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. This petition came up for hearing on 13.12.2011. Counsel for the petitioner had made a written request for adjournment. On this written request, case was adjourned for today. Counsel for the petitioner is required to remain present. None has come present when the case is called. Grievance made in the petition is very limited. Prayer is for setting aside the order dated 1.6.2010, whereby Sessions Judge, Faridkot had transferred the case from Moga to Faridkot, on the ground that no counsel is ready to appear on behalf of the accused in this case, which has been filed by a counsel practising at Moga. I do not find any justification to interfere in this order. If any accused has an apprehension of not getting a fair trial at a place when the complaint against him filed by a counsel who is practising at a particular place then no exception can be there to the order of transfer of the case. No case is made out for interference in the impugned order. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. December 14, 2011 ( RANJIT SINGH ) monika JUDGE