IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.471 of 2008 KABILASH BHAGAT & ORS Versus MOST. PHULMATIA KUNWAR & ORS ----------- 3 24.9.2008 Heard Counsel for the petitioner. This Court would not find any error in the impugned order allowing documents to be taken by way of additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Counsel for the petitioner would, however submit that the document which has been taken on record by way of additional evidence is not a genuine document. In the opinion of this Court, the Court below i.e. the Appellate Court has only taken additional evidence on record and as to whether the document is genuine or not has to be still gone into at the time of hearing of the appeal. It would be thus open for the petitioner to say everything about that document and assail its genuineness as is permissible in law. With the aforementioned observations, this civil revision application is hereby dismissed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)