IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.R. No. 174 of 2006 alongwith C.R. No. 175 of 2006. Decided on: 11 th November, 2010. 1. Ashok Kumar and another. …Petitioners. -Versus- Renu Sood. .…Respondent. 2. Ashok Kumar and another. ….Petitioners. -Versus- Renu Sood. ….Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________________ __ For the petitioners. : Ms. Charu Gupta, Advocate vice Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate (in both the petitions). For the respondent(s). : Mr. Ashish Jamalta, vice counsel (in both the petitions). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) : Ms. Charu Gupta, learned vice counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the present petitions have been rendered infructuous since the possession of the premises has been handed over to the landlord. Consequently, both the petitions are dismissed, having become infructuous. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge November 11, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?