IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 11198 of 1999 Between: Y. Suri E.96469, S/o Yesu Ratnam R/o Kattivaram, Tenali Mandal, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Managing Director, A.P.S.R.T.C., Musheerabad, Hyderabad. 2 The Divisional Manager/ Regional Manager A.P.S.R.T.C., Guntur District. 3 The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Guntur-II Depot, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in imposing the punishment of reducing my basic py by two incremental stages for a period of 2 years with permanent effect vide order No.02/01/960(3)/92-TNL dt: 4-12-92 which was confirmed by the appellate authority vide proc.No.PA/20(43)/93- DVM(G) dt: 12-6-1993 is illegal, arbitray and against to the principles of natural justice, and to set aside the same with a consequential direction to pay the arrears of increments from 4-12-92 in the interest of justice and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.S.M.SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.C.PRAKASH REDDY The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 11198 OF 1999 ORDER: Sri S.M. Subhan, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. ____________________________ Date: 19.03.2008 RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J MRKR To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{RAGHU}