IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.36329 of 2010 DHANU PRASAD . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2 06.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. As per the prosecution case itself, the petitioner was driver of the vehicle and he along with owner of the said vehicle, went to the shop of the informant and produced two demand drafts which were subsequently found forged. Admittedly, the owner of that vehicle namely Vijay Singh has been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge, Siwan. Drafts in question were produced by the petitioners but admittedly, the aforesaid transaction took place in presence of owner of the truck. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, I direct the petitioner Dhanu Prasad to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 88 of 2010 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan. PN ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)