IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10022 of 2001 Between: Deshpathi Lakshmi W/o Ramulu R/o H.No:14-1,Indira Gandhi Nagar, OOp: IDPL Colony, Hyderabad- 500 037 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The District Collector, Rangareddy District Hyderabad 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Qutubullahpur Mandal, Qutubullahpur, Rangareddy District 4 The Commissioner of Municipality, Qutubullahpur Municipality, Rangareddy District. 5 The Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceilings, Chandravihar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. R.SUJAN KUMAR FOR MR.P.SRINIVASULU Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent No.5: MR. P.V.SANJAY KUMAR The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings vide C.C.No.F1/7777/76, C.C.No.F1/6967/6968/76, dated 28-9-1993 and steps under Section 10(6) and consequent proceedings issued by the Mandal Revenue Officer vide proceedings No.A/1812/2000 dated 31.5.2000 as invalid, illegal and opposed to provisions of Urban Land Ceiling Act, and without jurisdiction and further declare that the members of the society/purchasers have got legal and valid title to the property and innocents/purchasers cannot be penalized for the Governments failure to proceed against the original owners.” Sri R.Sujan Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri P.Srinivasulu, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. In view of the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous, interim order, dated 16.05.2001 is vacated and WPMP.No.12563 of 2001 is dismissed. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 15th JULY, 2008. kvni