MC 1329/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T.NK SINGH Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is the case of the respondent No.9 who filed the present misc. application th at the writ petitioners, 5 in number, are not paying bill for the electrical ene rgy consumed by them to the respondent No.9. This fact is controverted by the le arned counsel for the petitioner by filing the affidavit in-opposition. In the course of hearing of the present misc. application, Mr. HRA Choudhury, le arned Sr. counsel appearing for the petitioners undertakes that if the bills for supply of electrical energy is furnished to the petitioners by the respondent N o.9, i.e. petitioner in the present misc. application, the petitioners are ready to pay the bill within a week from the date of receipt of the bill to be furnis hed by the respondent No.9. In the above circumstances, the respondent No.9, applicant of the present misc. application, is directed to furnish pending bills and also the current bills aft er 26.2.2010 to the writ petitioners within one week from today. The respondents /writ petitioners, on receipt of the said bills, shall clear the bill within two weeks from the date of receipt of the bill to the respondent No.9. However, lib erty is given to the respondent No.9 to approach this Court in case the writ pet itioners refuse to pay the bills for the supply of electrical energy to the resp ondent No.9 within the period stipulated above. With the above observation and direction, this misc. application is disposed of.