IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5513 of 2009 SAHU SITARAM PANKAJ Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 30.04.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State. A Vigilance Case was instituted. The petitioner was put under suspension and departmental proceedings initiated. The suspension was then revoked with direction that departmental proceedings shall continue. Thereafter sanction has come in the vigilance case and which is stated to be the ground for fresh suspension. The impermissibility of such action has already been considered by this Court in CWJC No. 5039 of 2009 disposed on 21.4.2009. For like reasons of the discussions contained therein fresh order of suspension dated 27.1.2009 is therefore not sustainable. It is accordingly quashed. The observations in the penultimate paragraph of the order to the following effect:- “This Court makes no observation or interference with the orders dated 15.3.2003 and 9.4.2003 passed by the authorities with regard to the petitioner.” stands incorporated in the present order also. The writ application stands allowed. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)