C.W.P. No.17259 of 1994 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No.17259 of 1994 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 1.10.2013 Roor Dass PETITIONER VERSUS M/s Indian Rubber Industries and another RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- None. MAHESH GROVER, J. The petitioner has impugned the award of the Labour Court (Annexure P-7) by which the reference claimed by him questioning the termination of his services was declined by holding that it was the petitioner who himself had abandoned the services. The counsel who filed the petition – Ms.Sheela Didi, Advocate has since expired. Attempts were made to serve the petitioner. The repeated efforts have indicated that the petitioner does not reside at the address given by him. The petition is therefore, dismissed for the reason that upon a perusal of the material on record, the plea of the petitioner regarding his termination/retrenchment of services has not been established in view of the Dass Ghanshyam 2013.10.03 14:00 I am the author of this document high court chandigarh C.W.P. No.17259 of 1994 -2- deficient evidence on record. That apart, it is to be noticed that the counsel for the petitioner expired a long time back and the petitioner has not made any arrangement to prosecute the petition which would indicate lack of interest in prosecuting the petition. However, to safeguard the interest of the petitioner, liberty is granted to him to revive the instant petition by making an appropriate application in this regard in case he intends to revoke this matter. The petition stands disposed of. (MAHESH GROVER) October 1, 2013 JUDGE GD WHETHER TO BE REFERRED TO REPORTER? YES/NO Dass Ghanshyam 2013.10.03 14:00 I am the author of this document high court chandigarh