KIW CWRT <y CTHATTIS6ARH AT NU5PUR W. P.(S) hto. 2641 af 2007 Petrhonws Versus Respwidents 1. Smt. <9yuwoti Aged obout 46 years, W/o; Shri Nar'ayon t.a( Oeefak Assjstont TecKher, Primwy Schoot Telcniwt' 2. ^annu Ram Mandavt <4gednbout 40 yeca's, 5/0. 5hri Rotaupam Mandavi Assistcnt Teacher, Priffidry School Vwchegondi 3. Vivek Kumor Ra»te Aged about 45 yeprs, 5/o. Shri Sukhuram Rmvate Assistmt Teadier, PriniiwySchoolPkJapal 4. Krishna Kumar Mandavf Aged dbout ^ 42 yea^, &te. Shpi Sukhdev Ram Mandovi, AaistCTrt Teocher Primcn'y SchoolPidapal,. All are <at 'BtocR Kaiker, bistt KonKertC'.S.) 1. State of Oihottisgar'h, TTiroygh Secretary, School Educatton E>eportnwnt, O.K.S. Bh<n»cn, RdpurpyS.): 2, The&i ctot*Pl^ticInstruction t>eportmentR<npup^6.) 3. Oistt'ictEclucafonOfficer Kankep&istrk;tKanker(C.&)Y 4. Block &lucatlonOfficeirKanke»' <C.&) 5. TreosuryA Funds&epartment Kahker(C.&) WritPetitiorrunderArticle 226of-riie Con^ftttfimof Sidjg SBiHon'bleShriJiaticeSatjsh K. <<yiihotri. Present: - I^.MS.Tc^t^a^^ peti'tionera ^.Sui'i^^J^^n^taiwiy^fwl^^f^/r^spondents. Subhash OROER (Passed on tkis 2i"l(:>oy Of May, 2007) 1. The question of l<n» tnvolved herein is asto whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f, the date of initial appointment or from the date of completiQn of probation period. 2. Learned counsef cype<ring for the petttioneps as well as for fhe State/respondents jointly submit that the facts and question of )<»» involved in the present writ petition are the same as to that of in W. P. (5) No, 5976/2006 (SushilTiwari and others vs. State Sovemment of ChhattisgwhiSiothers), which was allowed vide ot'der dated 7.U.2006. 3. In vieur of the <rf»ve-statedstAmissions mode by learned oaunsel for the parties, the writ petition is alloiwed in the same terms. No order* as to costs. Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge t^^s^l^^ '^^s^^ '•s!'^"sf^SPf'KSfK^^E^ %:^?^^'^'1^%1^^