FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.359 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr.A.G.Ansari for the applicant. Ms A.T. Jhaveri, A.P.P. for the State. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. DATE : MARCH 25, 2010. P.C.: The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the only important point of law that is pressed into service in the present Revision Application is that the applicant has not been given a hearing on sentence and, therefore, the order of the learned Magistrate is vitiated. He submits that the same reason has not been taken into consideration by the appellate Court. Perusal of paragraph 10 of the order of the trial Court would reveal that the contention is without any merit. In view of the concurrent findings, no case is made out for interference. Hence, rejected. B.R. GAVAI, J.