\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (2271 N0. 6580 OF 2008 PETITIONERS Non -Applicants RESPONDENTS Applicants Non-Applicants 1. 2. VERSUS 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Shyamlal, S/o Tulsiram Sahu, aged about 59 years, Mannulal, S/o Tulsiram Sahu, aged about 56 years, Both are R/o ofVillage -Aamdi, Tahsil and District Dhamtari (C.G.). Foolji, S/o Tulsiram Sahu, aged about 70 years, Rambai, Wd/o Gangaram Sahu, aged about 45 years, Dushyant Kumar, S/o Gangaram Sahu, aged about 22 years Kiran Kumar, S/o Gangaram Sahu, aged about 18 years Narayan, S/o Sakharam Sahu, aged about 55 years Rameshwar, S/o Sakharam Sahu, aged about 53 years Mukesh, S/o Sakharam Sahu, aged about 51 years Chamarin Bai, Wd/o Sakharam Sahu, aged about 70 years Kedar, S/o Anandram Sahu, aged about 50 years, Jagheshwar, S/o Anandram Sahu, aged about 48 years, Kriparam Sahu, S/o Anandram Sahu, aged about 47 years,, Naresh, S/o Anandram Sahu, aged about Respondent No. 1 to 12 are Residenf of Village Aamdi Tahsil and District Dhamtari (C.G.). The Additional Collector, . Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.). The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.). Tahsildar,Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE227 QF THE CONSTITUTIQN^F INDIA. (SB :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:- Shri P.P. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Malay Kumai' Bhaduri, Advocate for the respondents No. 1 to 11. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, P.L. for the State/respondents No. 13, 14 & 15. None for the respondentNo. 12. r:Sa^ \^ ^.. ^,^''/ "^.:'i^' ;4. ORAL- ORDER (Passed on 14/07/2011) By this petition under Article 227 of the Constttution of India petitioners have challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 3/10/2008 passed by Board of Revenue Chhattisgarh Bilaspur (Circuit Court, Raipur) in Revenue Revision Case No. R.N.04/R/A-6/ 14/2007. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Civil Suit for deciding the right of parties is already pending before the Civil Court therefore, he seeks to withdraw this petition. Prayer allowed. Consequently, petition is dismissed as withdrawn in the aforesaid circumstances. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P.Sharma Judge •^\-