IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 28th day of March, 2008 First Bail Application No. 225 of 2008 Criminal Side Neeraj Sharma S/o Shyam Lal, R/o Village Bahadarput Jat, P.S. Pathri, District Haridwar ……… Applicant-petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand ……….. Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 154 of 2007 Under Sections: 364, 302, 394, 201 & 411 I.P.C. P.S.: Khankhal, District: Haridwar. ________________________________________________________ Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. Heard Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner and Mr. G.S.Sandhu, Governments, Advocate for the State. My attention was invited to two orders passed by this Court in two separate bail applications, order dated 05th September, 2007 passed in Bail Application No.1100 of 2007 and order dated 09th October, 2007 passed in Bail Application No. 857 of 2007. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that vide the aforesaid two orders this Court has released the co-accused in the same episode. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondent does admit about the passing of the aforesaid two orders by this Court and submits that indeed the co-accused released in the aforesaid two orders are identically placed as the petitioner in the present case. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, this petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bail bond and furnishing two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar. (V.K. Gupta, C.J.) 28.03.2008 JPT