1 pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Arbitration Petition No.479 of 2010 Reliance Capital Limited .. Petitioner v/s. Mahesh Ramdas Jejurkar & Others ..Respondents Mr.Rahul Mehta i/b.KMC Legal Venture for the Petitioner Mr.M.K.Jain for the Respondents Nos.1 to 3 CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 30th March, 2010 P.C. : 1. Learned Advocate Mr. Mehta, upon instructions states that he is not seeking any interim relief in regard to the property described at item No.2 in Exhibit D to the petition. Statement made by learned Advocate Mr. Mehta is recorded. 2. In so far as the property at item No.1 mentioned in Exhibit D i.e. Flat No.114, first floor, F Wing, Building No.3, Aavishkar, Pratap Nagar, Off 2 JVLR, Jogeshwari (East), Mumbai 400 060, learned Advocate Mr. Jain appearing for the respondents states that as of today the Respondent No.1 is not in possession of the suit flat No.114. He states that he had entered into an agreement to purchase the said flat with the builder. He, upon instructions from his client, states that the Respondent no.1 shall not create third party right with regard to the flat No.114 till disposal of the Arbitration Proceeding. He, upon further instructions, makes a statement that if in future the builder offers possession of Flat No.114, Respondent No.1 shall not part with the possession in respect of the said flat till Arbitration Proceedings are over. Statement made by the learned Advocate Mr. M.K.Jain on behalf of the Respondent No.1 are recorded and accepted. Petition stands disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]