In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 39 of 1992 Date of decision: March 04, 2009 Kuldeep Singh Dhillon ... Petitioner Vs. Pritiner Kaur Thind ... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal Present: Mr. Jaspal Singh, Advocate for Mr. M.L. Sarin, Sr. Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Madan Lal, Advocate for Mr. Raman Mahajan, Advocate for the respondent. A.N. Jindal, J Learned counsel for the respondent-landlord has stated that his client has sold the demised premises to some other person, therefore, his plea of personal necessity, on the ground of which the present petition has been filed is ceased to exist. In view of this, the instant petition is allowed and the order of ejectment dated 24.9.1987 passed by the learned Rent Controller will not operate and the judgment passed by the learned Appellate Court is set aside. However, the vendees will be at liberty to move for ejectment if so desired on any ground. (A.N. Jindal) Judge March 04, 2009 deepak