THE HONBLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.21613 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: The petitioner herein claims to be the absolute owner and possessor of 400 sq. yards of site situated at Rekurthi Village of Karimnagar Mandal and District. It is stated that she made an application to the Gram Panchayat, Rekurthi requesting to grant permission for construction of a residential house and permission was granted by the Gram Panchayat vide proceedings dated 6.11.2006. Pursuant there to, she commenced the construction and the same was in progress. While so, respondent Nos.4 and 5, who are the residents of the village appear to have made representations dated 29.08.2007; 1.9.2007 and 3.09.2007 before the 3rd respondent alleging that the petitioner was proceeding with the construction contrary to the sanctioned plan and on the basis of the same, the 3rd respondent passed the impugned order dated 27.09.2007 suspending the building permission and directing the Gram Panchayat not to allow the petitioner to proceed with the construction. Aggrieved by the said order, the present writ petition is filed. Though Rule nisi was ordered on 11.10.2007, no counter affidavit has been filed by any of the respondents so far. I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties. As could be seen from the material on record, the impugned order is in the nature of an interim measure and further proceedings are still pending before the 3rd respondent. As a matter of fact, the petitioner herself stated that O.S.No.186 of 2007 filed by the petitioner seeking injunction against the respondent No.4 is pending in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar. Having regard to the above undisputed facts and since it appears that the matter involves several disputed questions of fact, interference by this Court at this stage is not at all warranted. Instead, since the enquiry is still pending before the 3rd respondent, without going into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 3rd respondent to complete the enquiry initiated pursuant to the representations made by respondent Nos.4 and 5, after hearing both the parties, and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 18.07.2008. Note: Issue CC in three days. (Bo) Kgr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.21613 of 2007 Between: Kankanala Bhagyalaxmi W/o.Satyanarayana Reddy, R/o.Q.No.46, Police Head quarters, Karimnagar Karimnagar District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Government of AP., represented by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad 2 The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Government of AP., Secretariat Buildings,Hyderabad 3 The Collector (Panchayathi Department), Karimagar District, Karimnagar. 4 Smt.Dugyala Ramadevi W/o.Laxmikantha Rao R/o.3-7-498, Vavilala Palli locality Karimnagar ,Karimnagar District. 5 Dugyala Laxmikantha Rao S/o.Not known, /o.3-7-498, Vavilala Palli locality Karimnagar ,Karimnagar District .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate wit or order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus to declare the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 27.9.2007 in No.A7/4618/2007-Pan-3 as illegal, arbitrary, without following due process of law and against the record and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. C. A. R.SESHAGIRI RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following: