1 22 caf.4770.09 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4770 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL (stamp) NO. 27248 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. T.S.Ingale for the Applicant. Mr. M.R.Katikar for the Respondent. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 02 nd May, 2011. P.C. 1 Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2 The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent has opposed this application for condonation of delay of 103 days. 3 The Applicant is the wife of the Respondent. The Applicant has filed an application under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 in the District Court for the custody of minor child. By the impugned order, the said application has been rejected. 2 22 caf.4770.09 4 In paragraph No.4 of this application, reasons have been set out for delay of 103 days. The dispute is about custody of the minor child. Hence, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). [ A.S.OKA, J ]