IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.35829 of 2009 1. BILASH YADAV @ RAM BILASH YADAV 2. Jagdish Yadav 3. Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----- 3/ 04.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. As per allegation, petitioners agreed to purchase the informant’s tractor making its price in installment for which it is said that possession was delivered but payment was not made. So, the sale-deed could not be executed. According to the learned counsel fault was on the part of the informant’s side for which a notice was sent to him to get executed the deed for sale which is replied in filing of the case. Moreover, claim and counter claim is there on the point of delivery of possession of the tractor. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 301 of 2008, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Jehanabad subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)