IN THE COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.667 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION:January 31,2011 Nand Lal .....Petitioner versus Gram Panchayat ...Respondent CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL Present: Mr.R.M.Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. A.N.JINDAL, J. (ORAL) It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the regular second appeal filed by the respondent-gram panchayat against the judgment and decree dated 10.10.2009 has been dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated 20.9.2010. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner has not complied with the directions issued by the trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 10.10.2009, inasmuch as, the petitioner has approached the executing Court before the expiry of time period granted to him for approaching the gram panchayat, but the essence of liberty given to him still survives after the expiry of time period. On that basis, it has been prayed that time period granted for approaching the gram panchayat be extended. I find no illegality and impropriety in the impugned order passed by the executing Court. Therefore, no interference is called for in the impugned order. Hence the present revision petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the plaintiff-petitioner to move an application before the executing Court for extension of time, if so advised. January 31, 2011 (A.N.JINDAL) kd JUDGE