IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.6537 of 2008 VINAY PRATAP SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 07.05.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under Sections 392, 411 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code is made out as per the allegation levelled in the FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that a motorcycle was parked in the campus of the petitioner and when the police came there the petitioner immediately informed that the said motorcycle was parked by co-accused Raju. The said co-accused Raju confessed his guilt. Learned counsel for the petitioner also avers that it is quite apparent from the facts and circumstances of the case that the petitioner has been falsely implicated although he has got no criminal antecedent but he is in custody since 26.11.2007. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed. Let petitioner Vinay Pratap Singh, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000.00 ( Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Ara Mufassil P.S.Case No.209 of 2002. sunil ( S.N.Hussain,J.)