HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY C.R.P. No.4789 OF 2009 DATE:13-11-2009 BETWEEN: Setti Manikyam & 2 others …Petitioners AND Nurukurthi Sathemma & 2 others. …Respondents THIS COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY C.R.P. No.4789 OF 2009 ORDER: Petitioners, who are third parties to the proceedings in O.S.No.175 of 1994 on the file of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada instituted by the respondents 1 and 2 herein against the defendant-respondent No.3 herein, filed I.A.No.513 of 2009 in I.A.No.270 of 2007 to implead them as party respondents in the final decree proceedings in I.A.No.270 of 2007. On dismissal of the said I.A. by the lower Court by order, dated 30.6.2009, the present revision is filed. It is not disputed that the petitioners are not parties to the suit in O.S.No.175 of 1994 filed for partition of the suit schedule property. On decreeing the suit on 14.2.2003, the father of the revision petitioners who is defendant in the suit, filed A.S.No.1909 of 2003. In the said appeal also, the revision petitioners filed similar application in A.S.M.P.No.854 of 2009 to implead them as party respondents in the appeal. This Court by order, dated 15.9.2009 dismissed the said A.S.M.P. holding that the revision petitioners are not entitled to implead in the appeal filed against the preliminary decree proceedings, and that if they have any right over the suit schedule property, it has to be established in an independent suit. In view of the subsequent developments as referred to above, the impugned order passed by the lower Court dismissing I.A.No.513 of 2009 does not suffer from any manifest illegality warranting interference by this Court. The revision is accordingly dismissed at the threshold. No order as to costs. _______________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J. NOVEMBER 13, 2009 Tsr.