IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28115 of 2008 SHEO NATH AZAD @ DR.S.N.AZAD S/O LATE BHIKHU MAHTO, R/O VILLAGE- MORASARAI, P.S. SHEOSAGAR, DISTRICT- ROHTAS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 5 03/12/2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel representing the State and learned counsel for the informant. The informant’s only son was kidnapped and later on demand of ransom was made. The amount was negotiated and the negotiated amount was to be paid by the informant. The informant was trying to arrange the amount in the mean time dead body of his son was found. Submission is that some of the accused persons have been admitted to bail and the case of the petitioner is on better footing. There is allegation of kidnapping for ransom and later on when the amount could not be given then the kidnapped boy was killed. The petitioner’s name has come during investigation. Considering the allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected in connection with Sasaram (Dariganw) P.S. Case No. 620 of 2007 avin (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)