CMPMO No. 450 of 2009 02.01.2010 Present: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. G. D. Verma, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. B. C. Verma, Advocate, for the respondents. In the cause title inadvertently name of the petitioner has been typed as “State of India” whereas it should be “State Bank of India”. The cause title is directed to be corrected. The Registry may make necessary changes. Today Mr. G. D. Verma, learned Senior Counsel has orally prayed for review of the decision in view of the decision rendered by the Apex Court in Nahar Industrial Enterprises Limited versus Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, (2009) 8 SCC 646. The ratio of the law laid down by the Apex Court is not applicable to the facts of the instant case as no orders for transfer of the civil suit from the Court of Sub Judge to the Debt Recovery Tribunal have been passed in any proceedings. Hence the oral prayer for review of the order cannot be allowed. (Sanjay Karol), Judge. January 2, 2010 (PK)