In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh RFA No. 2531 of 1994 (O&M) The State of Haryana .... Appellant vs M/s Raman Stone Crusher ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Himanshu Aggarwal, Advocate, for the respondent. Rajesh Bindal J. Through the present appeal the State of Haryana has approached this court for reduction of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the State of Haryana vide notification dated 31.8.1987 issued under Section 4 the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, acquired land alongwith superstructure existing thereon, situated in Village Devi Nagar, District Ambala (now District Panchkula), for public purpose namely for the development and utilisation thereof as recreational and commercial area for Sector-3, Urban Estate, Panchkula. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, “the Collector”) awarded ` 66,649/- as compensation for the labour quarters and ` 15,000/- on account of shifting charges. Dissatisfied with the award of the Collector, the claimant filed reference before the learned court below. The learned Additional District Judge, while considering the material on record, awarded ` 84,921/- as compensation for the existing building structure, ` 15,000/- on account of loss of business, and ` 10,000/- more on account of shifting charges. It is this award, which is impugned in the present appeal. Learned counsel for the parties very fairly conceded that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in RFA No. 1702 of 1994 M/s Gulati Stone Crusher, Devi Nagar vs The State of Haryana, decided on 25.2.2010, whereby the compensation payable to the landowners has been further enhanced. Since this court in M/s Gulati Stone Crusher's case (supra) had further enhanced the compensation, the appeal filed by the State for reduction does not survive. Accordingly, for the reasons recorded in the aforesaid case, the present appeal is dismissed. 6.9.2010 (Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge