1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 6947 of 2011 alongwith CWP Nos. 6949, 7081 & 7191 of 2011. Decided on: 1st September, 2011. 1. CWP No. 6947 of 2011. Naryan Singh Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 2. CWP No. 6949 of 2011. Braham Dass Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 3. CWP No. 7081 of 2011. Ishwar Dass Vs. State of H.P. & ors. 4. CWP No. 7191 of 2011. Onkar Singh Vs. State of H.P. & ors. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. For the petitioner (s) : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Advocate in CWP Nos. 6947, 6949 & 7191 of 2011. Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate in CWP No. 7081 of 2011. For the respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General. 2 Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim work charge status on completion of eight years of continuous service as daily waged beldar. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 2735 of 2010, Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and others. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. We are informed that the State has filed an appeal against the above mentioned decision. Therefore, it is made clear that the implementation of the judgment, referred to above, would depend on the outcome of the decision of the Apex Court. The needful action, after verifying the facts, will be taken within a period of two months from the date of the judgment of the Apex Court. The petitioner(s) will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition(s) before the 3rd respondent/competent authority. 2. With these observations, the writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 1st September, 2011. (Justice Rajiv Sharma), (sck/hl) Judge.