éé‘ HgGH CQUR'E' OF CHHATTESGARH AT BELA$PUR DiVlsmN EENCH CQRAN‘ RQNsgiE SERI RAJEEV GU?TA, CJ. E ‘ %‘EOW’§LE SHR§ DH§RENBRA NHSHR& J j Appegmnts 1 AppEica‘gms t/v 9 v 3) } 0 é? gm AppeaaiPR) N0§swzw$ 1. Mfs Jagdish Rice and Oi! Mms, A Proprietorship Firm through its Prapvietor Shri Gk-raj Mahawar, . Jsypore Road, Jagdaipur, Distt BastaHCG) G%r-raj Mahawar, Slo Late Khemchand Mahawar, aged ‘ about 35 yeas, Occupatim Business, R/o Kumarpara, Jeypore Ream}, Jagdaipur, Di$ttBastar (CG) Versagg Resnondents i. Central Bank of indie, through its Manager, Choubey Coiany, Rapur, District Raipur (CG) Centrai Bank of Endia through iis Branch Manager, , Jagdaipur, Branch Jagdaipur, Distt; Basiar (CG) iiimerveneri 3. Sushii Chand Pagariya, S/c Late Shri Mangiiail Paga'iya, aged abou’r 44 ~ years, R/o 3, \livekanand Nagar Raipur (CG) Wrig Aggeei under Sectian Z £1} 0? the Chhattisgarh Hrgh 6mm gkggea! to Division Bench) Acir 29% Present : Shri Manmdra Shrwastava Senior Advocate With Shn Seniay Kumer Agrawei counseiforthe appeiiants. Shri Prashant Miehra, Senicr Advecere with Shri Y3 Thakur; counsei for reegondents No.1 & 2. QRDER (22nd February, 2008) 8 The following order 0f thg Ceurt was passed by §%&§¢av Gugta, CJ! Learned Senior counsei Shri Manindra Shrivastava subm§is that in VEew of the settlement between the appellants and respg‘néent — Bank, the appéat, now, has became lnfructuoue. 2) The appeel, therefore, is dlemlesed as tnfructwue. a Sdl- n Chie Justce Sd/- DHIRENDRA ,MISIrmA Judge l l l l f i