BS'tl? ^^Slf.;i ji'ii^LE S£.stl; ^r^ o BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATriSGARH At BILASPURfC.G.y W.P.227NO. /2008 •/ PETITIONER •^ Birendra Gupta, S/o Late Ishwar .. Dayal Gupta, aged about 22 ^V^/^,.-- ^ Years, Occupation Stiidents R/o '.^^o^'""' Mohalla Branma Road, Gity, P.S. and TahsiJ Ambikapur Distt. Surguja (C.G.) <9 ^!^ VERSUS NON-APPLICANT Ramchandra Prasad Gupta S/o Parmeshwar Sao, aged aHQut ©O years , Occupation Busine'ss R/o infrunt of Panchsil Gali, City, P.S, and TahsilAmbfkapur Distt. Surguja(C.G.) WRIT PETII^N UNDER AlfTICLE 227 C^ mi& CONSTITUtroNll€OF INDIA^^^^ F^ APPROPRIATE ©RDER WRIT I THE NATURE JlQ MANDAMUSCEICTIORAIUSONDIRECtION/ORDEftSlNtM LIKE NATUREETG. ~0». il ^E?. Sinate8enehi^Ht!n'lMe^mJusB l*rashantKi^^ PIETmONER KrendraGu|;to Veisus NON-APPUCAIW Ramctandra PrssadGupta Shri SunB Tri|ra(hi, cmrre61 ftiirthe peWoner. ^ None forresper^iKA/non-apfttiBnt. ((ff.flaBzo?!^ HesBd. ,..li:'.;: !:. ^ . •: ^ .'.: , ^:, •<; '. . '. j • .' . ' '' :;. {2) Ttw Cpurts foeifflw haw ^ia'ntele^] Itie^ ^ a^ica(^ur^QKiera8|R^^ <3) The.p^itiQt^ hasffl^it^^ datecl 97-11 -1996flxetitrted^|^|at|iw|l^i(^|3«^!§ugteinj (rfdefendarrtRameteBKlraPra!^^ be declared «sinitl and yoid ara:!^^ ttirt^ pliiun^is^Gwr^oflhesySpnyerty. (4) AccordTO to ttie pe E»»erthe suit ^ix^i^ty ts Ahe.^^aEi^ljail pN^ieTtytrfhiSi^^fisrtheRire^ betr^X<Mpa a^ofthej^jtl«r(dy^^^ tt^^'Uie'de^in;la(rtlt^.9Gfrj|ii!G|t^j|feie:;'^^^ jtf hayts5^ji'nei^lcondiyc|jiiJ|6^Ns^fi t^;ai^^e^ onthe^ptain^ An|q3p(;iW||K»^t^^^ the pleadingsiflia^if t|wdgf?i^si|rt ^flot Fe^aine^^im Mj^|^ng|in hispo^es^^^ftQn»;ia|^|®^cwst^^ ^••i- l(W .—€ ^ -2.. su^irrqiarableloss.Thesuitiwasfll^wthem^ ;:IN ^) The defend^^ hi^ repty to MW pla^^ of temporary injunG^ ancfe^s^Wat he te in po^e^icin of flieisuit (and aro» after exeGuiion d" ^ rrecessary sariction for <»ns(ractk»nof^^^^^b^ ftwn the^MuRreiRal Gorpc^fon ^aftercfemaroaflonofltwfandby^ tes started nuang ,ccwist(urtion which is almo^ com||iete. "nie ttefendant has <i^ied ^at he^^^^^^ rnisrepresentisftKm^the^imeofexeGut^ to him the entire s^e cwisfeter^oh was|^ to.^^aM^I^)^ the pres«TCe of his dde^ son Sur^ro^ pteffitiff) who is alsOa witnessto ttie^ale-deed. (6) The trial Cwrt has d^te^ e^s#p8ca^ ure^i^ Rute 1 & 2 of C.P.G. atter hoh^jl^ t^ tteBW pfmafe^caseiRt^^avowalt^itiiej^ n^in his^fe^w i]Bigi.^e^late3©a^tt^ preferred bylhe plauntiff. C^ Coims^ fbrtt petitioneFiti^?a(^^i at^ thesyitisacoparo;eneryj3fGp^|^iM^S^^^ tMrth.tttepurctisSe^ttiepartyt.^ifl't^^ or to be conHnuedAm poss^siGli3w<|we^iC^t^1^ :Hon'ye Supre^^<xirt;;irttt^iffl rt|^|of^ Cooml Sc^.W»d^.<^:<i<^E^SB^:»^|^ti^|f^ :in.the..:matteR.of:.Snn .;,t.,a(a»:,la»^s8i^':l^9i<»;5 o(ftCTSreportedin^OT<Wti ffK1^A|^ vsi^tfBivmiwi^ \\' v ,/1 '^\. 1 ^,; 1}ia<^J *assxsi!!y > ^. yii 1k telowhavenot/artMecia^ttwlacteof^ arwl have re<»rd^perverwfincUngs. (8) The i^^ asto vWether^he^propertym^ prqierty and wt^er the i^^^ su{fert(^f(omintw^^altiRattereto^^^ (9) Fromth^ rep^jRtedby^tlefencla^ e^ipearthatthesuftpropaly^^pureBased^ ftwiCoUeGtQ^ sy(g^and^thed|N^^Nss'ute®<¥^^ paTnis^bntoraisecoiNluctkm.Mehatea^^^^n^^ the constnrotK»tsa<most^^^<^^ materia(?on rei^ tocoriferov^ithe^^ ;made:in-his;rep|y..^,..: ^ ?,^: y.i-:; ;i: -:.:::',:,., • ; ••:,.:. . :.• •.:, .:,. :j':::'. ^, (10) ft ^^ld therefore flppegirWat^T^^ thesuitlandg^ttassfeart^ra®CT appltea(^\^c6nsiCte^t^^ passedtherea^^^<xrtth^it^r®N^i"temn?ord^ RtauitiffiljxtitiOT^. Two CourtejbiBtow^l^^ ptaintlff wfth.'re^e<A to;^te)u^|n^|i^i^:^Fna^ac ; crf conventence SBKI wTqiara^e^ote. Ke^^ iin view;^ the facts, U^! Court is ^ N^IB^ to ir^^ supervisoryCs^ un<^Aitic^j22^o{tkie^^ ^11) 'ThepeW6ntetlw tl|srNs^;;ntW®^ffi®^ todov^ltodtept^of^l^il^iieai^^ptt^^ penod Msix|nkH^fi<m;jtt ?e^ order." • •• ' : • •,',•,.' .'':::' .': ' :. : :: __—.— -g Sd/1-. - 'p PrashantKumar Mishra | Judge _1-