IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 28TH NOVEMBER 2006 / 7TH AGRAHAYANA 1928 Bail Appl..No. 6817 of 2006() ----------------------------- CRMP.9175/2006 of J.M.F.C.-III, PUNALUR .................... PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED -------------------------------- ACHENKUNJU, S/O. SKARIYA, KALEELAZHIKATHU VEEDU, NEAR LPS., VADAKODU MURI, THALAVUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT ------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNNICODE POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. JAI GEORGE THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/11/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bail Application NO. 6817 of 2006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED: 28-11-2006 O R D E R In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the 2nd accused in Crime No.347/06 of Kunnicode Police Station for offences punishable under Secs. 8(1) and 8(2) of the Abkari Act, for having been found in possession of 4 ½ liters of illicit on 17-10-2006, seeks his enlargement on bail. 2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application submitting that the petitioner is an accused in two other cases involving similar offences. 3. I am not satisfied that both the grounds enumerated under Clause (b)(ii) of Sec. 41 A of the Abkari Act are present in this case so as to justify the release of the petitioners on bail. This Application is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE. ani. /true copy/ P.A. to Judge.