IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15260 of 2009 PINKAL @ PASHUPATI NATH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 10.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Petitioner has been made accused in Danapur P S Case No.68 of 2008 under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that informant’s motorcycle was snatched away on the point of gun including his mobile for which the present case came to be launched. After investigation role of the petitioner came into picture and he has been remanded in the present case on 21.4.2008. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is a young boy. His father is an ex-Army man and he is willing to take charge of the life and education of the petitioner. In the totality of the above circumstances, let the petitioner Pinkal alias Pashupati Nath be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A C J M, Danapur, in Danapur P S Case No. 68 of 2008 with direction that petitioner will co-operate in the trial and shall not commit any other crime during the period he is on bail. It is further directed that one of the surety will be executed by the father of the petitioner. rkp (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)