I $-84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1787/2011 BANTI & ANR. Petitioners Through Mr. G.P. Singh, Adv. with petitioners In person. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Respondents Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State with Mr. Girraj Singh, SI, PS Badar Pur Mr. S.K. Sapra, Adv. for R-2 & 3 With respondents in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA ORDER % 26.05.2011 Crl.M.A. 6421/2011 Exemption allowed subject to just exception. CRL.M.C. 1787/2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 545/04 under Sections 323/308/34 IPG registered at PS Badarpur, New Delhi on the complaint of Respondent No.2. As per the complaint it is alleged that a dispute arose between Bittu and the complainant as he put a small brick in the drainage. On the Petitioner's asking Bittu got agitated and called liis brother Banti. While Bittu caught the Respondent No.2 Banti gave a danda blow and when his wife Respondent No.3 came forward to save him, Bittu gave a danda blow on her hand CRL.M.C. 1787/2011 page 1 of 2 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified also. Both the injuredpersons i.e. RespondentsNo.2 & 3 are present in person and are identifiedby their counsel. They say that have settledthe matter and in view of the settlement between the parties, they do not want to pursue the abovementionedFIR and the proceedingspursuantthereto. LearnedAPP for the State, on instructions,states that besides the RespondentNo.2 & 3 there is no otherinjuredvictiminthepresentFIRand nootheraccusedis involved. In view of the fact that the partieshave amicablyresolvedtheir differences and no usefulpurposewill be servedin continuanceoftheproceedings,ratherthe same would create further acrimonybetweenthem, it would be in the interestof justiceto quashthe abovementionedFIRandtheproceedingspursuantthereto. Consequently,FIRNo. 545/04underSections323/308/34IPG registeredat PSBadarpur,NewDelhiand proceedingspursuanttheretoareherebyquashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgmentof their statements before this Court. The petition is disposed of Order Dasti. MUKTA GUPTA,J MAY 26, 2011 'ga' CRL.M.C. 1787/2011 page 2 of2