- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.W.P.NO.2767 OF 2005 Imran Mohmmad Ameen Khan ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent .... Mr.Arfan A.E.A.Sait Advocate (appointed) for Petitioner Mrs.A.S.Pai, A.P.P. for State .... CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM: D.G.DESHPANDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : APRIL 10,2006 DATE : APRIL 10,2006 DATE : APRIL 10,2006 ORDER ORDER : (PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J): ORDER ORDER : (PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J): ORDER ORDER : (PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J): 1. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner had preferred application for furlough. The said application for furlough came to be rejected on the ground that the surety furnished by the petitioner was not found suitable. The petitioner has now furnished another surety i.e. Zarina Sayyed. The particulars of the said surety are given in the petition. In this view of - 2 - the matter, if the said Zarina Sayyed is found to be suitable surety, the petitioner to be released on furlough in accordance with the usual terms and conditions. 4. Petition is disposed of. [D.G.DESHPANDE, J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]