IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9391 of 2010 RAHUL SHARMA, SON OF SURENDRA PRASAD SHARMA, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA BALUGHAT, P.S. TOWN, DISTT. MUZAFFARPUR. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 02.12.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 2.12.2009 passed by 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, in Sessions Trial No. 612 of 2008 by which he has refused to discharge the petitioner. The contention of the petitioner is that since the victim did not name the petitioner in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C., the petitioner should have been discharged. It has fairly conceded that the petitioner was named in the First Information Report expressing suspicion against him. In view of such, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application is dismissed. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)