IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.81/2003 Chhitar S/o Shri Kalyan ...defendant-appellant Versus Rameshwar Lal S/o Shri Mangi Lal Rathi ...plaintiff-respondent Date of Order ::: 29.11.2006 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain Shri Deepak Goyal, Counsel for defendant-appellant Shri M.M. Ranjan, Counsel for plaintiff-respondent #### By the Court:- Heard learned counsel for the parties. The plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for permanent injunction based on easementary right, which was decreed by the lower court. The judgment and decree passed by the lower court, has been affirmed by the first appellate court also. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and after considering their submissions in the light of the findings of both the courts below, I find that the controversial issues involved in the present case relate to the questions of fact and there is concurrent finding of facts by both the courts below, which cannot be interfered with by this Court in second appeal under Section 100 of the C.P.C. No substantial question of law is involved in this second appeal and the same is accordingly dismissed at admission stage itself with no order as to costs. (Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//