1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE LPA No. 87 of 2006 PRADEEP BALKRISHNA ADSULE ... Appellant V/S KOLHAPUR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE AND ORS. ... respondents with LPA NO. 88 of 2006 KIRAN PANDURANG MAHADESHWAR ... Appellant V/S KOLHAPUR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE AND ORS. ... respondents Mr. S.S. Pakale for appellants . Ms. Topkar for respondents (in both matters) CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & MRS. ROSHAN DALVI JJ. DATE:25/04/2006 P.C.: 1. Heard. Admit. By consent heard forthwith. Since common questions of law and facts arise in both the appeals, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. In both these matters there are concurrent findings on the point of absence of prima facie case in favour of the 2 appellants for interim reliefs during the pendency and till final disposal of the complaint under M.R.T.U. & P.U.L.P. Act filed by the appellants. In fact the judgment passed by the Labour Court in that regard elaborately discusses all the material on record to ascertain whether there was prima facie case for the appellants to secure interim relief in the nature of restraining the respondents from terminating the services of the appellants and the Labour Court on detail analysis of the materials on record has held that the appellants have failed to make out a prima facie case for the reliefs prayed for. The learned Single Judge also has on appreciation of all the materials on record has confirmed the said finding. The findings being clearly borne out from the record do not warrant any interference. There is absolutely no case for interference in the LPA. Hence the Letter Patent appeals are liable to be dismissed and are hereby dismissed. (MRS. ROSHAN DALVI J.)(R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR J.) 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Civil application No. 107 of 2006 in LPA No. 87 of 2006 PRADEEP BALKRISHNA ADSULE ... Appellant V/S KOLHAPUR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE AND ORS. ... respondents with Civil application No. 108 of 2006 in LPA NO. 88 of 2006 KIRAN PANDURANG MAHADESHWAR ... Appellant V/S KOLHAPUR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE AND ORS. ... respondents Mr. S.S. Pakale for appellants . Ms. Topkar for respondents (in both matters) CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR & MRS. ROSHAN DALVI JJ. DATE:25/04/2006 P.C.: In view of the rejection of L.P.A. No. 87 of 2006 and L.P.A. No. 88 of 2006 these civil applications do not survive and dismissed accordingly. 4 (MRS. ROSHAN DALVI J.)(R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR J.)