IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.24950 OF 2010 VIJAY ANAND VERSUS 1. STATE OF BIAHR & 2. KUMARI SNEHA W/O VIJAY ANAND ----------- FOR THE PETITIONER:- MR. RAJIV KUMAR VERMA, SR.ADVOCATE & MR. BIMAL KUMAR FOR THE STATE :- MR. N.N. TIWARY FOR THE COMPLAINANT:- MR. JOHRA. ---------- 2 04.08.2010. Prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner, who happens to be husband of opposite party no.2 and accused in Complaint case no. 1122 of 2008 instituted by her under section 498A of the Penal Code and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 19.4.2010, annexure 1 with following observations:- “In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this court passes the following order: i) No coercive steps would be taken against the petitioner for a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint case no. 1122 of 2008 pending in the court of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar. ii) If within the aforesaid period, both the petitioner and the complainant appear in the court below and express their desire that they are willing to live together then the learned Magistrate would extend the interim order of stay for further periods in order to ensure that they are living together happily, otherwise he would dispose of the matter in accordance with law.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is willing to keep opposite party no.2 with care and affection but she does not want to live with him. Counsel for the informant submits that the petitioner 2 had tortured her for demand of dowry. The prayer for anticipatory bail is again disposed of with direction to the petitioner to surrender and seek regular bail which would be disposed of on its own merit preferably on the same day without prejudice. Shashi. ( Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)