IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2653 of 2008 KUMAR MANISH SON OF SHRI CHANDRA SHEKHAR PRASAD SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PAHARPUR, P.O. PAHARPUR, P.S. PAHARPUR, DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN. Versus 1. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. THE SECRETARY, ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS, GOVT. OF INDIA, INDIAN ROAD CONGRESS, SHAHJAHAN ROAD, NEW DELHI. 3. THE SECRETARY , PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 4. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, G/5 & G/6, SECTOR 10, DWARKA NEW DELHI THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN. 5. THE PROJECT CHIEF ENGINEER, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS TRANSPORT BHAWAN, 1, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI. 6. NATIONAL HIGH WAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (CAMP) BHAGWANPUR CHOWK, MUZAFFARPUR. 7. THE GENERAL MANAGER CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S. I.B.P. COMPANY LTD., I.B.P. HOUSE, 34-A, NIRMAL CHANDRA STREET, KOLKATA. 8. THE CHIEF DIVISIONAL MANAGER, I.B.P. COMPANY LTD. ABHAY BHAWAN, THIRD FLOOR, POST BOX 208, FRASER ROAD, PATNA. 9. THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. LOK NAYAK BHAWAN, 5TH FLOOR, DAK BUNGALOW ROAD, P.S. KOTWLAI DISTRICT PATNA THROUGH ITS GNERAL MANAGER. 10. THE GENERAL MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. LOK NAYAK BHAWAN, 5TH FLOOR, DAK BUNGALOW ROAD, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT PATNA. 11. D.R.S.M. MUZAFFARPUR DIVISIONAL OFFIE, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. KRISHNA COMPLLEX AKHARA GHAT ROAD, MUZAFFARPUR. 12. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 13. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, EAST CHAMPARAN. - 2 - 14. DR. NAGESHWAR NARAYAN SAGHI SON OF LATGE HARI MADHAN SAHI, RESIDNET OF MOHALLA DAK BUNGALOW ROD, BETTIAH, P.O. BETTIAH, P.S. BETTIAH, DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN. ----------- 2 31/03/2010 After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the respondent Oil Corporation, the Court gets a clear impression that it is a camouflage writ application to protect the commercial interest of the petitioner’s father who happens to be a dealer. If there is any breach of law or the rules, then the concerned authority can very well be approached who can take appropriate action in the matter in accordance with law. This Court cannot interfere in this matter in the above stated circumstance. This writ application is accordingly dismissed. AMIN (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)