' \r..- HIGH CQURF OF CHHATTGARH A? BILASPUR ’ IS Cr. MP. No. 477/2009 PET Satya Dha Khubchandani S/o am Shn‘ Rattan Lal Khubchaxld aged about 37 years, Rio Old ashbandhu Press State, Lodhipara, Station Road, Raipur (C.G.). RE‘ 1. Smte of Chhattisgarh, through—Station House Ofiicer, P.S. Civil Line, Raipur (C.G.). ACCUSED ’2. Rajiv Agrawal sjo Shri Rajendra Swaroop Agrawal, aged about 51 yeas, Rio Ashoka Park, Khamhardih Road, Shankar Nagar, Raipr (C.G.). Chhagan Lal Mundara s/o Shri Kedama Mundara, aged about 49 years, R/o E-S, shoka Tower, Shar Nagar Chowk, Raipur (C.G.). 4. Rajiv Mundara, s/ o Shri Kailaehchanda Mundara, aged about 27 years, R/o E-8, Ashoka Tower Shankar Nagar Chowk, Raipur (C.G.). CG 5. Vimal Kumar Agiawal S/o Shn' Omkarmal Agrawal, aged about 52 years, Rfo in front of Circuit House, Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G,). ET CO (SB :Hon’ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present- Shri Sudhir Rawat, Advocate with Shri Pramod Chandra Kerketta, Advocate for te petitioner. Shri Rajendra ’I‘Iipathi, PL, for the State/respondent NO. 1. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 08/ 09/ 2009) - 1. This petition is under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the Code) for suitable direction to essions Judge, Raipur for considering its preliminary objections filed y the petitioner before the Sessio Judge, Raipur in bail application o. 17/2009. 2. Learned ounsel for the petitioner ubmits that in the light of order dated l9/8/O9 passed by the Sessions Judg respondents No. 2 to 4 have filed an application under Section 439(1) of the Code before the same court x ITIONER mm L am, D VERSU S SFOBIDENTS u th A ank r MPLAINANT ITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DE. h S b ns N 47 c s e .. . .. Le. Sessions Judge, Raipur for their rélease. Present petitioner has filed an objections in aforesaid application for regular bail on /9/09 relang to the maintainability of the bail application Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that Sessions Judge has fixed the case for consideration of the objection filed on behalf of the petitioner but it requires first decision before passing any order upon the application of respondents No. 2 to 4 on merits therefore, suitable direction be issued to the Sessions Judge, Raipur. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioer reveals that n Sessions Judge, Raipur has not denied the hearing or has not declined to hear the application filed on behalf of the petitioner Present etition is premature and misconceived. Consequently, this petition is liable to be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed at the stage of motion hearing %V m-wrr‘. il’ Sdl— T. . Shrma Judg 4 ti p V " " ei P a e