IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11461 of 2008 MD.MUSTAQUE ALAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 02 05.09.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. For the reason that the petitioner has already been working for seven years at the station from where he has been transferred, in absence of allegations of violation of statutory rules, loss of status or loss of pay, this court is not persuaded to interfere in exercise of its writ jurisdiction. If the State Government has framed guidelines, circulars and rules interalia for duration of transfer and consideration by the establishment committee thereof, it cannot act arbitrarily by pick and chose even while leaving out those who may have remained at one place for longer years without the procedure of the recommendation of the establishment committee. It, accordingly, directs that the representation of the petitioner, in light of the aforesaid discussion be considered and disposed off ‘in accordance with law’ by a reasoned order and speaking order from twelve week from the date of receipt and /or production of a copy of this order. The writ application disposed of. Sym ( Navin Sinha,J.)