IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-15980 of 2010 Date of Decision : 30th September, 2011 Taranvir Singh .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL. Present: Mr. G. S. Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. C. S. S. Sisodia, Advocate for the complainant. * * * * L.N.MITTAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the complainant submit that matter has been compromised between the parties in Mediation and Conciliation Centre functioning in this Court as also borne out from the proceedings of the Mediator. It is also stated that petitioner and complainant are residing together as husband and wife. Counsel for the complainant accordingly states that the complainant has no objection if the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail. In fact, according to compromise, the FIR itself is to be got quashed on the basis of compromise. In view of the aforesaid, the instant petition for anticipatory bail is allowed without expressing any opinion on merits of the case. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the investigating officer, subject to the conditions specified in Section 428(2) Cr.P.C. Presently petitioner is directed to join investigation on 21.10.2011 at 10.00am and he shall continue to join investigation as and when required by the police. ( L. N. MITTAL ) JUDGE 30.09.2011 'raj'