IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16976 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Manoj Kumar Sah, S/O Brahmadeo Sah, R/O Ref- Vill- Bharat Khand Deorhi, P.S.- Parbatta, Distt.- Khagaria. 2. Saroj Kumar Yadav, S/O Sri Siyaram Pd. Yadav, R/O Vill- Bharatkhand Deorhi, P.S.- Parbatta, JDistt.- Khagaria. 3. Pawan Kuamr Singh, S/O Ram Narayan Singh,j R/O Vill- Bharatkhan Deorhi, P.S.- Parbatta, Distt.- Khagaria. 4. Jeeban Kumar Singh, S/O Ballav Singh, R/O Vill- Bharatkhand Deorhi, P.S.- Parbatta, Distt.- Khagaria. .... .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Home Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Inspector General of Police, Bihar Military Police (B.M.P.) Bihar, Patna. 4. The Chairman, Constable, Selector Board Begusarai, through S.P. Begusarai. 5. The Deputy General of Polcie, Munger Range, Munger, 6. The Superintendent of Police, Begusarai. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== 2 27-09-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned G.P.-22 for the respondents. The writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to complete the selection process initiated vide Advertisement No. 2 of 2004 and to fill up all the posts which were vacant till advertisement. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his case is covered by a decision rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in L.P.A No. 831 of 2009 and other analogous cases reported in 2011(3) PLJR- 575. He prays that similar directions may also be issued in the present case since the petitioner is also similarly Patna High Court CWJC No.16976 of 2011 (2) dt.27-09-2011 2 situated. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that due to paucity of facts mentioned in the writ petitioner, he is not in a position to verify whether the present case is on similar footing of the facts of the case decided by the Division Bench of this Court as referred to above. Be that as it may, this Court is inclined to dispose off the matter in similar terms of the aforesaid Letters Patent Appeal No. 831 of 2009. The only rider this Court would put to the same would be that the authority shall also verify as to whether the facts of those cases were similar to the facts of the present case. If it is found that the present case stands on similar footing, the same direction would cover the present case. The writ petition stands disposed off with the aforesaid observations and directions. Bhardwaj/- (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)