IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 21ST MARCH 2011 / 30TH PHALGUNA 1932 RP.No. 175 of 2011(H) -------------------------------- ( THE JUDGMENT DATED 01/10/2009 IN WP(C)NO.26712 OF 2009 -H) ---------------------------------- REVIEW PETITIONER(S): ------------------------------------ 1. S.M.SAJAN, GRADE HC NO.4782, ANCHAL POLICE STATION, KOLLAM. 2. SHAJAHAN, GRADE HC NO.4772, PUNALUR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM. 3. SULAIMAN.H., (WRONGLY SHOWN AS SOLAMN IN THE WRIT PETITION AND SELECT LIST AND SENIORITY LIST) GRADE HC NO.4776, THENMALA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM. BY ADVS. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY SMT.N.SANTHA SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO SRI.ANAND.S.A. RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. P.DHARANEENDRAN, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN, SREE SAILAM, CHITTUMALA, EAST KALLADA P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT, NOW WORKING AS GRADE HC NO.4380, CBCID, KOLLAM-690 032. 2. KUNJUMON.M., AGED 46 YEARS, SON OF THE LATE MATHEW, ROSE HOUSE, KAITHAKKODU P.O., PAVITHRESWARAM VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, NOW WORKING AS GRADE HC NO.4466, EAST KALLADA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM-690 032. 3. SOMA RAJAN.V.P., AGED 44 YEARS, SON OF THE LATE V.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, KATTIL VEEDU, THEVALLY P.O., KOLLAM, NOW WORKING AS GRADE HC NO.4479, KOLLAM WEST POLICE STATION, KOLLAM-690 032. sts R.P.NO.175/2011 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, PIN-695 001, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. 6. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOLLAM-690 001. R1 TO R3 BY ADV.MR.BIMAL K.NATH R4 TO R6 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts S. SIRI JAGAN, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P. No.175 of 2011 in W.P.(C)No.26712 of 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of March, 2011 O R D E R The petitioners in the review petition has filed this review petition with the grievance that the judgment dated 01.10.2009 in the writ petition was passed without hearing them. But they now submit that, in view of the fact that pursuant to the judgment sought to be reviewed the orders passed were not unfavourable to the petitioners, the petitioners do not want to pursue the review petition further. Accordingly the review petition is closed. Sd/- S. SIRI JAGAN JUDGE //True copy// P.A. TO JUDGE shg/