!£is9 W THE HON'BLE fflGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (CG) FIRST APPEAL N0. 'a^ / 2009 s&i 'J^.,]^y ..,^ R-u APPELLANT^. ^^l.· 9^^.-- .-^€^ '.^r~ PHOOL DAS S/o Shri. Budduram Satnami Aged about 45 Years, Resident of: Shantinagar, Bhatapara, Tehsil : Bhatapara, District: Raipur (Chhattisgarh). ^- VERSUS RESPONDENTS A L^ Baisakhu S/o Shri. Kheem Satnami, Aged about 60 Years, Resident of: Village : Surakhi, Tehsil-Bhatapara, Dist. Raipur. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Collector, Raipur (CG) FIRST APPEAL UNDER_SECTION 96 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE. 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE PASSED ON 7.^3009 IN OVIL ^^ >--^' SUIT N0. 6A72008 BY ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BHATAPARA. '^--•^nSS^gS^S •'. •.;:^, "•:-i*»:ssi ,4 HIGHCOURTOE.CHHATTISGARH.BILASPU CORAM: Hon'bleShri I.M. Quddusi, J. & Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. F.A.No.87of2009 APPELLANT RESPQNDENTS Phool Das. Versus BaisaMiu and another. ;pearance: None for the appellant. Shri Santosh Kumar Verma, Advocate appears on behalf ofShrl J.R. Verma, counsel for respondent No.1. Shri Vinay Harit, Dy. Advocate General for the State/respondent No.2. ORAL ORDER (01/03/2011) Foilowing oral order of the Court was passed by List is being revised. Case is called out twice. No one is present to press this appeal, therefore we have no other option but to dismiss the instant appeal for non-prosecution. In view ofthe above, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. "Sd/- LM.»t,», j : ^""S'"151"' Judge