KBGH COURT OF JUDICATORE CaiMATnSGARH: BnAWOR v Btl iMi^te Beacli: Hoa'bte Slai SaUsli K. Agnihotr^ J. w. p. (81 ao. 670 ofsmw Applfcant Mccnu F'rakash Rajak, s/o Mahalco Kegak, agcd about 2S yrs, Laboxafaay Atteadant (Panch^ra^ Govenunent CoUegp Dabhra, Distt. Bflaspur (M.P.) Veraus Rcspondents 1. State ofM.P. (Now C.O.) throughfhc Sccrctaiy ttapartmcnt of CoJlcgiate . EducaBon BIiopaL Dnector of CoBe^ate Education, Gowt ofM.P. Bhopal Additioiial Director, DirectoBate of Highcr Education Bilaspur, Bilaspur, M.P. Principal, Govt CoBey:, Dabhra, Distt DiIaspurM.P. 2. 3. 4. APPUCATION U/S 19 OFTHBADMINISTRATIVE TKIBUNALS ACl', 198S Shri Rupcsh Shrwastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Misa Uccpali 1'andcy, 1'ancl temycs for thc rcspondcnts. ORDBR (Pass^ oa tUs 23^ day ofAiaU, 2007 ) 1. The petitioner has fited this petitk»afor seekit^ qu^ihiag ofthc ordcr dated 9.9.1992 (Annexure A/l), whereunder the seniTces of ffae petitioner was terminatcd w.e.f. 10th Scptemher, 1992 on the grcnind that his appoiatment was not in accordance wiffa the scheme of appoiatmenfc 2. Leamed couasel appearing &r tbe petitioner siibmits that fbe petitiQn.cr was appoiated as Laboratory Assistant (Attendaal) ia the Govenunent CoBege, Dabhra, District - Bflaspur aficr sdcction by a dufy constituted selcction committee, vidc order dated 2.3.19W (Annexurc A/3). He furfher submits fhat fhe semces ofthe petitioner was terminated without foUowing tfac prmciples ofnaturaljustice and wifhout aflfording an opportunity ofhearmg. V 3. Lcamexl counsel appearix% for fhe respondents submits Qiat sinuteity situated emptoyec (Shri Jay Narayan Smgh), whose serviccs wcre teniiiaated atong wifh fh.e petitioner, had ftled O.A.NO. 2766/1990, whfch was disimssed by fhe Statc Adinmistratwe Tribinnal vide order datcd 7.8.1992. 4. Be fhat as it may, (hc appomtment of fhe petitioner was de-bors fhe ConstitutK>Dal schenBe ofthe appointmcift and not in accoidancc wifh law. Thus, fhe petituiier has no riglit to fhe post. It is weB settted now that a person appointed de-hors the constitutional scheine offhe ecaptoyment and not in accoidaacc wifh Rutes, Regulations, haa no right to fhe post. 5. Por fbe reasons above-stated, fhc petitioner fa not entitied fbr reappomtment/remstatemcat in fbe service. 9. This pctitiou is Sicoordmgly cUBmrased. No order as to eoste. Judge Thakur •t