IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1216 of 2009(O & M) Date of Decision:09.07.2009 Phoolo Devi ....petitioner Versus Amarjeet Dhiman .....respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Ms.Seema Pasricha, Advocate for the petitioner **** CM No.15615-CII of 2009 CM is allowed as prayed for. COCP No.1216 of 2009 The petitioner, in this case has complained of the violation of the judgment and decree passed in her favour by the Civil Court vide Annexure P-1. The petitioner has an equally efficacious remedy under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC for execution of the aforesaid judgment. In view of the aforesaid, I am not inclined to take cognizance of this contempt petition. Dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to seek any other appropriate remedy in accordance with the law. (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE 09.07.2009 neenu