HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 1996 of 2009 (M/S) Vijendra Kumar …. Petitioner .. Versus State of Uttarakhand & others … Respondents Mr. A.V. Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondents. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the caveator. 25th November, 2009 Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Sri A.V. Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner, Sri K.P. Upadhyay, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand and Sri Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the caveator. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 20.11.2009 (Annexure no. 7 to the writ petition) passed by the Additional Director, Garhwal Region, Pauri Garhwal by which an administrator has been appointed in place of the Management Committee of the “C.M.D. Inter College, Churiyala, Haridwar.” The admitted facts of the present case are that an administrator has been appointed by the Additional Director as the period of the management committee which is of three years has now come to an end and there being a provision in the scheme of administration whereby once the term of a management committee comes to an end, elections of the new management committee shall only be conducted by an administrator. This being the admitted position of law this Court finds no anomaly in the impugned order. Learned counsel for the petitioner Sri A.V. Pundir then states that he apprehends that the new administrator which 2 is appointed will not conduct the elections of the new management committee in time. This apprehension of the petitioner is entirely misplaced as in the impugned order itself it is written that the new administrator will immediately take steps for constitution of new management committee under the scheme of administration and as per the report of the enquiry committee. Hence, no interference as prayed by the petitioner is called for except the District Education Officer, Haridwar and the administrator are directed to forthwith take steps for conduct of new elections of the management committee in accordance with law. With these observations, writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 25.11.2009 Avneet