IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.279/2007 IN ITXA (L) 44/2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.279/2007 IN ITXA (L) 44/2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.279/2007 IN ITXA (L) 44/2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.280/2007 IN ITXA (L) 43/2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.280/2007 IN ITXA (L) 43/2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.280/2007 IN ITXA (L) 43/2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.281/2007 IN ITXA (L) 42/2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.281/2007 IN ITXA (L) 42/2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.281/2007 IN ITXA (L) 42/2007 The CIT, Mumbai .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Regal Shoes .. Respondent Mrs.P.P.Bhosale with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant. Mr. A.K.Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 15th April, 2008 DATE : 15th April, 2008 DATE : 15th April, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By these Notices of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 181 days’ delay caused in filing each of the Appeals. For the reasons stated in the affidavits-in-support of each of the Notices of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, all the three Notices of Motion in the respective Appeals are made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) respectively. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)