THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 2392 of 2009 Oral order: The petitioner stats that based on the complaint lodged by her, a crime in Crime No. 22 of 2008 under Section 3(i)(x) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act, was registered by the Sultan Bazar Police, against one Kum. G. Padma Goud, and it is her grievance that the respondents are summoning her to the police station, threatening and forcing her to enter into compromise with the accused in the said crime. The learned Government Pleader for Home on written instructions from the Inspector of Police, Sultan Bazar Police Station, Hyderabad, submitted that they having registered a crime based on the complaint of the petitioner, investigated the same and also filed charge sheet on the file of II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. He denied that the respondents threatened the petitioner to compromise the matter with the accused, much less summoned her to the police station, after filing the charge sheet. In view of the above, no orders need be passed in the writ petition, and the same is accordingly closed. However, if the respondents act in violation of the statement made to the Court, the petitioner is at liberty to make a mention before the Court for re- opening of the case. No costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J. Dated: 24th February, 2009 KSR