IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN CONTEMPT CASE No.273 of 2010 Between: Bonumaddi Vitalamma ... PETITIONER(S) and Sri Mrutyunjay Sahoo …RESPONDENT(S) THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.273 of 2010 ORDER: The petitioner filed W.P.No.25602 of 2008 for a writ of mandamus against the respondents declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not disposing of the appeal or application for stay filed by her. The Writ Petition was disposed of on 12.02.2009 directing that it shall be open to the petitioner to present a copy of the revision filed by her against the order of the second respondent dated 25.04.1994 and other relevant papers along with a copy of that order before the 1st respondent and that the 1st respondent shall dispose of the revision within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of that order. This contempt case is filed alleging that the 1st respondent in the Writ Petition did not implement the directions issued by this Court. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. There was some uncertainty as to whether the petitioner has presented the revision before the respondent. Ultimately it emerged that the petitioner has presented such papers and, though with some delay, the respondent passed orders in G.O.Ms.No.602, Revenue (Assignment-VI) Department, dated 26.06.2010 dismissing the revision and upholding the orders challenged therein. Hence, it cannot be said that there was any violation on the part of the respondent. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the orders passed in G.O.Ms.No.602, Revenue (Assignment-VI) Department, dated 26.06.2010, she has to work out her remedies independently. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. __________________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J 13th July 2010 CVRK