IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.739 of 2008 SMT. RAJ KUMARI DEVI @ RAJ KUMARI SHARMA AND OTHERS ____________ Petitioners Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ____________ Opposite party ----------- 5. 23.03.2011 In the counter affidavit which has been filed on behalf of the respondent Electricity Board coupled with the supplementary show cause, the stand of the respondent is that the direction of the Court has now been fully complied with. The liability arising therefrom has been worked out and payments made. This matter was adjourned allowing the petitioners to verify the actual state of affairs. Today counsel for the petitioners informs the Court that he has not been given any clear stand. However, a statement has been made that probably amount paid does not match up to the claim which the petitioners expect. The Court can only observe that it will be a question of accounting and verification of accounts. If the petitioners seriously feel that there is some error in the calculation of the payments which have already been made, they have surely freedom to approach the respondents on this score and respondents will have an obligation to look into the accounts and satisfy the petitioners on this issue. 2 MJC application otherwise has lost its meaning and it is dismissed accordingly except to the extent of indulgence given to the petitioners. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)