LPA No. 314 of 2009 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 314 of 2009 Date of decision: 4.5.2009 Anu Gupta and others ...Appellants Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondent__ CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellants. -.- ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. (oral) 1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 10.11.2008. The operative part thereof reads as under:- “Consequently, this writ petition is allowed to the extent that the Chief Administrator, HUDA Panchkula is directed to reconsider the claim of the petitioners No. 1 to 4 in terms of the policy dated 10th September 1987 and if found eligible, to allot them plots as per their entitelemnt. The needful shall be done within a period of three months from the date of certified copy of this order is produced before him.” 2. The appellants-writ petitioners, sought directions for allotment of plot as per policy, Annexure P-14. The said claim, however, was rejected on the ground that the petitioners were not the owners for the prescribed period preceding the acquisition. 3. Contention on behalf of the petitioners was that requirement of LPA No. 314 of 2009 2 five years ownership prior to acquisition had been relaxed subsequently and accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of in above terms. 4. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellants. 5. We do not find any ground to interfere with the finding given by the learned Single Judge. 6. The appeal is dismissed. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE 4.5.2009 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) mk JUDGE