IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2184 OF 2009 (MS) Smt. Karuna Sharma and others. …Petitioners. Versus Chairman, Nagar Palika Parishad, Haridwar and others. ………Respondents. Mr. Pankaj Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for the respondents. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Heard Mr. Pankaj Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for the respondents. In this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 15.12.2009 passed by the Nagar Palika Parishad, Haridwar by which election process of certain Committees of the Parishad, which had already started and nominations were to be filed on 15.12.2009, has been stayed until further orders. It is settled position of law that once election process has started, normally the process must reach its logical conclusion and it is very rarely stayed. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for the Nagar Palika Parishad seeks three days time to apprise this Court as to what were the compelling reasons before the Nagar Palika Parishad to stop this process. Apparently, no reasons have been assigned in the order impugned. Put up this matter on 30th December, 2009 in the daily cause list to enable the learned counsel for the Nagar Palika Parishad to get instructions. (Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.) 24.12.2009 Rathour