MC 2301/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI Heard Mr. DK Das, learned counsel for the applicant, who seeks to be imp leaded as party respondent No. 6 in WP(C) No. 3773/2010. Heard also Mr. UK Nair, learned counsel for the writ petitioners, Mr. B Goswami, learned counsel, appea ring on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 3, Mr. BJ Ghosh, learned Government Advocate, for the respondent No. 2, Mr. DK Mishra, learned Senior counsel for th e respondent No. 4 and Mr. LP Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5. Considering the fact that the interest may be adversely affected by the out-come of the writ petition, this Court is of the view that in the facts and circumsta nces of the present case, the applicant needs to be added as party respondent. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the prayer for impleadment is allowed. Let the writ petition be corrected accordingly. With the above observations and directions, this miscellaneous case shall stand disposed of.