^Y BEFQRE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P (S) No. 06-^0 of 2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS .^^ ^y^y Ramratan Nayak, aged about 56 years, • S/o Late Shri Shankar Lal, Headmaster, Government Middle School, Parramtola, Block-Chhuriya, District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) VERSUS :1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : the Secretary, . Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block- Chhuriya, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION s ;@? IHG <^URTQECHHA1''I'IS©AR fcfiILASFHR S.B.: Hon'Ble SMTii^atnuMaraMdhaa^Slu'ivajstava. ds PETIfIONER RESPONDENTS WritlE'etiiiiOn^tSl N0.2830/2011 Ramra.fgLn Nayak Versus StatgoCCShlaattisgarl-iandothers Writ Petitibn u/A^226 O!*' ttte CSQinstltution 6f Indla I^eSie^: - Shn ©aufam^KKetra^^a^ ^Ia^wyg:^^ i.;,for^ ^:Slin'.::.",%asun.&l*;.Bl$gtd;idi^,,..^^^^^^ 'State^respon.SenlS^igtisf^stBige.eQ^. the ORABORfiBR (Passed on 13U1 ofMay, 2011} With the conseht of learried counsel for the p I|ttter is heard finally. 1 .The petitioner was appomtedasAssistaMtTeacheron^^ of Rs.lQO/-. After successfully eompletmg the probafion peripd of 2 y®ars,he was grantedregylarpayscale. 2. Leaiaed coyrisel appearing Sor ffi& pet^^ issue involyed in the case is as to whetlier, the pefitioner; is -^ntitled to regular pay scale ^th :ef%et froni the date Q^ appomtmentor aftercomplettQaofprobati&npenod."^ 3. The issue involved herem, was^ epnsi8ei"ed •'by .tKe^'M.seStiya.. Pradesh State - ^mirustrative h~^^ JaBalpur | in, "l^-';?iii9'^:;^:^^^^- !i:i'l ^•^'i.:' '<a SSi, «]1 iil «; lflllll E!K31 ijllll^ljl^^l' IW EiS]!lsB Bi m USf: SIK^t- Ip'll O.A.IIo.2745/89 (JHiadftuicartt ya<ft( «nd56 otftero (4 iS&i^ Qf MP. ^fc other^ \ ereiii; it w beH that the siniilarly sityated teax:heFS aee ^ irom the date OfiiMHal a^b^ te the Hcin'ble SiL^relHe;f<3®^m^ No.6892^93. e said^gtttiOH ^ Suprerae Ceurt, upftolding tli& ^decisiora ef fhe Tntai.tnal tQ tlie ^fiec^ that ^the -TeSK^rs/As.sistant^^^^^^^ ¥ggular^ayseale£r6Hithe<late^^^^ 4. la^view of^e abc^ tl^ p8ities,Yy^e writ i.e. tKe pefitioner^^^ so advised, to consider l^ caSe on ^ts own •-fi^ perspective. Ifthe pefttioner stands pn the saine^^^fo order passed by the SAT in TOadhijkant Ya<tu (S^ subsequently eonfirmGdlay^e'Supreme^^^^ Petition(CivU) No.6892/03by order dated 3/1794-, tiiepetiiiqner may be entitled tosaine relief aecoi'dingly. 5. No orders as to Cost. Sd/- Manindra IVIohanShrivastava Judge 1 Peepti