1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2751 OF 2004 IN SUIT NO.2770 OF 2004 Shrinivas Keshav Joshi .. Plaintiff Versus Mahalaxmi Pictures & Ors. .. Defendants Mr.K.K.Tated for plaintiff Mr.R.Jain for defendant Nos. 1 and 2 None for defendant No.3. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 7th April 2008 P.C. . Mr.Jain appearing for defendants brings to my notice that a notice of motion No.2684 of 2005 was moved and the same was dismissed after hearing parties. 2. Mr.Tated, learned Counsel for plaintiffs 2 in all fairness does not dispute the same. To my mind, the reliefs claimed in the present notice of motion are identical and even the contents of the affidavit in support of both motions are more or less similar. There are no changed circumstances pointed out soas to take different view. Notice of motion is, therefore, dismissed. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J)