..?. [^. ^1 c-P-l^.L Ksv^ion IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT:BILASPUR W.P. No. %?^»OF 2005 PETITIONER: ^ Manoj Agrawal, aged 35 years, son of Shri Shanker Lal Agrawal, resident of Gondpara Bilaspur, tehsil & district Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) RESPONDENTS: / <? VERSUS / (1) State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, department of Revenue, Raipur. / 2. Inspector-General of Registration, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). / 3. District Registrar-cum- Collector of Stamps, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) / 4-Sub-Registrar, Registration department, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE rCGNSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF k>WMT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, "w MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER L'lK^. ,.-^^ ,^[JITABLE WRIT, ORDER, DIRECTION. XI-HC-22 3^T ^l^ld^l, ^Tf1<-l4J<o, I^<rtl^^< •^ , <3T7^r (^ -p 2f <^ch *11^C<11 $h^|cft ^33~?-f ^-r ¥E[ 200 3TI^?T^)T ^i4)3TI^T ^R^i^^f^T 3TT^?T ^cTTW ^rfN* <=hl^?d41^ ^l^dT ^ tec?rt ^f^fRK ^)3Tf^T3TT^1 DB: Hon1>le Shri Jiisticel & Hon'ble Shri Justicel 10.8,2005 A. K. Patnaik, C.J. Satish K. Agmhotri, J, Heard Mr. Somnatit petitioner and Mr. Pras] Advocate General for fhe The petitioner purctj for a cousideration of Thousaad) aad after execi^ presented before fhe Sub-] The Sub-Registrar referre^ Bilaspur for deteniiuiation| fhat the land has been il Verma, learaed couiisel for fhe |iaut Mishra, leanied Additional r^spondents/ State. tased a piece of laiiG:,oii 30.7.1997 ps. 2,01,000/- fTwo Lacs, One Ition of fhe sale deed fh-e same was Ipegistrar, BUaspur for registration, fhe docunients to fhe CoUector, of the value as he was of the view ndervalued in fhe sale deed and deficit stanip duty aiid re^istratioii charges had beeu paid. The reference has been |registered as Revenue Case No. 358/B-105/96-97. Aggriel/ed, the petitioner has ffled this petition under Article 226J/227 of fhe Constitution of India for quashiag the said Revejaue Case No. 358/B-105/96-97. ^ Mr. Verma, leamed 'ounsel for fhe petitioner siibniits fhat ui a decision of the tfuU Bench of fhe Madhya Pradesh (tftt^^) XI-HC-22 3TI^?T^)T ^Tr^)3:n^T ^w^rfN' 3^T ^l^lcrl^, ^Tn<Hjj(o, [^crtl<-l^< •4. 2: ^n^r^^ 332>-^o5' ^l^dl $h*4ich -9--------- ^ 200 i^S 3TI^T^<n^K^{?cf -2-- High Court ia fhe case Markaad Singh 1984 J.l objection regardmg defici^ tioie of registration of caanot be raised by submitfed that m fhe p^ deed was first registered the objection was ralse^ ©ubinittedthat the vali] stated ia fhe sale deed Registrar fhat fhe laad deed is iiot correct. Mr. Prashaat Mii General, on fhe other| Registrar appears to ha^ the registration of the s correct tih.at the objecjtio: WrTfe4^ WTOT H fe^ <f^%K ^3Tf^H3T^1 of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. .J. 328, it has been held tih.at aa. staxnp dzity has to be raised at the tjie docunieiit aad such objections l(he Siib-Registrar afterwards. He ssent case, on 30%?1997 tlae sale ^>y tiie Sub-Registorar and fhiereafter by fhe Stib-Registrar. He further te of the land had been correcfly aad fhe view taken by fhe Siib- Ihas been undervalzied in. fhe sale shra, leaaied Additional Advocate haiid, submitted that the Sub- raised fhe objectiou at the time of ble deed on 30.7.1997 and it is not tion was raised miich after the submitted that it is clear from flie registration. He furfher objection of fhe Sub-Re^istrar fhat the iastrument had been (<ft^^r) r XI-HC-22 ^?T^)T ^rN^Tr^r $TOW^T -^. <t PT '^ y^ ?'y ^r^Nid^, ^Td^iig-, f^rcry [?F^5(ch '^ . 2{ wiTn-gw^---^33^0^^ 200 ^n^T^cn-w^T -3- +l^?d41^ WRTfif fec^ ^f^RTI: ^3T<^TT3TT^1 gros^ly iindervalued aadj deficit stamp aad registration fees had beeii paid on the uis|tniinent. Iii our considered (view fhe writ petition is pre matiire as flie Reference niade t decided, Iii the referen< |) fhe CoUector, Bilaspur is yet to be ^e the. petitioner wiU have all diie opportzuiity to be hearp. an.d make his siifcniissions wifh regard to fhe legality of Ithe refereiice aad the correctuess of the valuation of fhe l^iid ui fhe in.stniment and if such contentions are raised consider aa.d decide tliel [by the petitioner, the Collector will sazae ui accordan-ce wifh law, With fhe afores^id observations fhis writ petition staiids dispose-d of. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge (tf^y^) r