WPMS NO. 89 OF 2009 Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. N.P. Sah, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, learned counsel for respondent no. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 raised preliminary objection that the petitioners have alternative remedy in view of Sub Section 4 of Section 15 of the Sugar Cane (Regularisation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 . Therefore, without entering into the merits of the case, it is provided that the petitioners may file appeal before State Government within a period of three days from today. In case such appeal is filed before the State Government, the same shall be decided on or before the State Government the same shall be decided on or before 02.02.2009. After filing appeal, copy of the appeal will be served on respondent no. 4 by DASTI so that respondent no. 4 be also heard by the Secretary, Sugar Cane before taking decision in the appeal. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is finally disposed of. (V.K. Bist, J.) Vacation Judge 20.01.2009 arti