IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2010 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 WP(C).No. 36055 of 2010(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------------- JOSEPH.T.G,THEKKEKARA PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, ENAKAKKAD, WADAKKANCHERY POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.GIKKU JACOB RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR. 2. THE TAHASILDAR,THALAPPILLY TALUK, WADAKKANCHERY PO, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 3. THE THALUK SURVEYOR, THALAPPILLY TALUK,WADAKKANCHERY PO, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ANKAKAD VILLAGE, WADAKKANCHERY PO, THRISSUR DISTRICT. GOVT.PLEADER SRI.P.NARAYAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================ W.P.(C) NO. 36055 OF 2010 ===================== Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2010 J U D G M E N T Petitioner submits that pursuant to the directions in Ext.P4 judgment in WP(C) No.16891/09 directing that action be initiated on the complaint made alleging encroachment, Ext.P5 notice was issued requiring the petitioner to be present for a field survey. It is stated that thereupon he submitted Ext.P6 objection disputing the claim that no portion of the property has been encroached upon by him. In this writ petition, what the petitioner submits is that further action based on Ext.P5 is likely to be taken without adverting to Ext.P6 objection. 2. In the nature of the grievance thus raised, all that is required is that if the 2nd and 3rd respondents intend to proceed with Ext.P5, they shall duly advert to Ext.P6 objection filed by the petitioner. There will be a direction to that effect. 3. Petitioner to produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd and 3rd respondent for compliance. Writ petition is disposed of as above. Rp ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE