1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION(W) NO. 1646 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2939 OF 2009. Anil Abhimanyu Wath. .Vrs. The Nagpur Nagrik Sahakari Bank and another. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders. (Mr. N. L. Jaiswal, Advocate for applicant. Mr. S. K. Mishra, Assistant Solicitor General of India for respondent No.2 ) -0-0- CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & A. P. BHANGALE, J J. DATED : 30 th August, 2011. In Writ Petition No. 2939 of 2009, the civil application is filed by original petitioner for directing the respondent No.1 to consider the proposal of the petitioner to close the loan recovery matter under One Time Settlement Scheme framed by R.B.I. On 16th August, 2011, the statement was made by the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 that entire outstanding is recovered from the petitioner. Accordingly, time was given to the petitioner to verify and to make a appropriate statement, in that regard. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that he is still awaiting instructions. Mr. Paliwal, learned Counsel for the respondent No.1 today states that the respondent No.1 has also issued 'no due certificate' to the petitioner. In view of this unequivocal statement of the respondent No.1, it is apparent that grievance made by the petitioner not only in 2 the present civil application but also in the Writ Petition stands redressed and rendered infructuous. We, therefore, disposed of the Civil Application as also Writ Petition as infructuous. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Deshmukh