IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 9184 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION: MAY 6, 2011 Anita Sethi .....Petitioner VERSUS The Union of India & others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Karminder Singh, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 & 3. Mr. Manish Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. It is not disputed before me that the action as taken by respondent No.2 Bank to get the salary of the petitioner attached, may not be sustainable. Respondent No.2-Bank undertakes that they will withdraw this letter. The writ petition is accordingly rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. It is made clear that the salary of the petitioner shall not remain attached in pursuant to the communication impugned in the present petition. May 6, 2011 (RANJIT SINGH) monika JUDGE