IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.191 of 2008 SACHCHIDANAND CHOUDHARY Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. DHANANJAY SINGH 3. MIRTUNJAY SINGH 4. JAG NARAYAN SINGH. ----------- 2 26.11.2008 This revision has been preferred against the judgment dated 5.12.2007 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in Nasriganj P.S.case No. 84 of 2004, G.R.No.493/04 thereby opposite parties 2 to 4 have been acquitted. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no opportunity was afforded to the petitioner, who is informant of the case, to support his case and the case has been decided only on the basis of the evidence of the witnesses who came in collusion with opposite parties. Considered the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners. Perused the impugned judgment. On perusal of the impugned judgment it appears that in course of trial the prosecution examined as many as five witnesses and all witnesses turned hostile. Efforts were made for examination of other witnesses but they did not turn up. Under the circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment of acquittal. This application is accordingly dismissed. B.Jha (Ghanshyam Prasad)