CRM No.M-26658 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:-6.10.2010 Tejwinder Singh son of Balbir Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present:- Mrs.Gursharan K.Mann, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Shilesh Gupta, D.A.G. Punjab. M ehinder S ingh S ullar , J . (Oral) Having exercised his right of anticipatory bail and lost in the Court of Session, petitioner Tejwinder Singh, has directed the present petition for anticipatory bail in a case registered against him and his other co-accused, namely, Ajmer Singh, Ranjit Singh and Tejpal Singh, vide FIR No.93 dated 11.8.2010 on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under sections 323, 326, 427 and 452 read with section 34 IPC by the police of Police Station Raja Sansi, Amritsar, invoking the provisions of section 438 Cr.PC. 2. Notice of the petition was issued to the State. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, having gone through the record with their valuable help and after considering the entire matter deeply, to my mind, the present petition deserves to be accepted in this regard. 4. As is evident from the record that only lalkara is attributed to the petitioner. All other injuries are attributed to other co-accused, who have already been arrested by the police. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Tarsem Singh, has submitted that the petitioner has already joined the investigation and he is no longer required for further interrogation at this stage. All the offences alleged against the petitioner are triable by the Court of Magistrate. Moreover, CRM No.M-26658 of 2010 2 there is no history of previous involvement of the petitioner in any such case. 5. So, taking into consideration the fact that only lalkara is attributed to the petitioner and totality of other facts and circumstances, emanating from the record, as discussed here-in-above and without commenting further anything on merits, lest it may prejudice the case of either side during the course of the trial of the case, the present petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in the obtaining circumstances of the present case. 6. Consequently, it is directed that in the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail and surety bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- to the satisfaction of Arresting Officer, subject to the conditions that (i) he shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Agency as and when required; (ii) he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) he will not leave India without prior permission of the trial Court. 7. Needless to mention that in case, the petitioner does not cooperate or join the investigation, the prosecution would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of his bail, in this relevant connection. 6.10.2010 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) AS Judge