IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.34230 of 2008 1. SHAMBHU PD.JAISWAL, S/O JAGDISH CHOUDHARY, 2. JAGDISH CHOUDHARY, S/O NATHO CHOUDHARY, R/O VILLAGE-MIRJAPUR CHAND NINGO, P.S. BARAUNI, DISTRICT-BEGUSARAI. -PETITIONERS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR. –OPP.PARTY 3 14.11.2008 The fall out of the inducement, as alleged, is breaking of the promise to pay wages. The other allegation is of kidnapping and then selling or murdering the kidnapped son of the complainant. It is alleged that on promise to pay wages at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month the petitioner had taken three of the sons of the complainant to Mumbai whereupon two of the sons returned empty handed and the third son did not return. Prior to the filing of the complaint, petitioners themselves had filed a complaint against the three sons of the complainant alleging that they had taken advance and expenses on account of expenditure for supplying labourer but no such labourer had been supplied. Considering these aspects of the matter, the application is allowed. Let the two petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- 2 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in Teghra P.S. Case no. 98 of 2008, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Barin Ghosh, J.) AAhmad