... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6065 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6065 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6065 OF 2005 Anil Ramkhilwan Yadav ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Shri K.S. Patil for the Applicant. Shri R.Y. Mirza, A.P.P. for the Respondent. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2005. DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2005. DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the Advocate appearing for the Applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State. Perused the order passed by this Court on 19th September, 2005 in Criminal Application No.5828 of 2005. By the said order, this court rejected the Application made by the co-accused for bail. 2. After having heard the Advocates appearing for the parties, I find that no case is made out for grant of bail. The allegation of the prosecution seems to be that the Applicant and co-accused assaulted the deceased on his head by a weapon known as "Kukari". Perusal of the Post Mortem Notes shows that there are not less than fourteen bleeding injures on the person of the deceased and many of the injuries are on head. At this stage, there is sufficient material on record to show the complicity of the Applicant. No case is made out for grant of Bail. Accordingly, Application is rejected. ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE