IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13449 of 2010 RAM CHANDRA SAH, son of Sri Janak Sah, resident of Parvati Bhavan, Ranisati Chauk, Kasba, Police station Kasba, District Purnea. ---Petitioner Versus 1. B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura through its Registrar. 2. The Vice-Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura. 3. The Registrar, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura. 4. The Finance Officer, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura. ---Respondents ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr Uday Chand Prasad with Mr Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocates For the University: Mr. Hemendra Pd. Singh, Advocate -------------- 2. 17.8.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-University. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his superannuation on 31st of March, 2009 from the post of University Professor while working in the respondent-University, he has not been paid any of his retrial dues save and except the provisional pension. The petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievances with regard to the payment of the retrial dues, he filed a representation, which has not been considered till date. Mr Harendra Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the respondent-University submits that the claim of the petitioner is not clear. As such, the same needs to be verified from the record. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for - 2 - the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims as highlighted in this writ application, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Registrar of B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura (respondent no.3), with a copy each to the Vice-Chancellor of the University (respondent no.2) and the Finance Officer of the said University (respondent no.4). In case such a representation is filed stating distinctly the details of his unpaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in his representation be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner with regard to the payment of his retrial dues may be settled and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)