CW 1724/01 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1724/01 Fateh Lal Meena Versus Bank of Baroda & Anr. DATE OF ORDER : 27/03/2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Virendra Lodha, for petitioner Mr. R.K. Kala, for respondents *** Instant petition has been filed by petitioner assailing his verbal termination. Counsel for respondents has filed reply to the writ petition and has raised certain preliminary objections that since these are disputed questions of fact which can only be gone into by appropriate forum provided under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. In view of preliminary objection raised by counsel for respondents, counsel for petitioner does not want to press the writ petition with liberty to raise dispute before the appropriate authority provided under the Act, 1947. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA1724CW2001 27-3.doc