THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P. No. 2789 of 2009 ORDER: The respondent filed O.S.No.113 of 2006 in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Rayachoty, against the petitioner for recovery of amount, on the strength of promissory notes. The suit was decreed on 07-05-2007. Since the petitioner did not honour the decree, the respondent filed E.P.No.16 of 2008 under Rule 38 of Order XXI C.P.C., for his arrest. The application was opposed by the petitioner. Through its order dated 07-05-2009, the Executing Court allowed the I.A., and directed arrest of the petitioner. Hence, this revision. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. The petitioner does not dispute his obligation under the decree. However, he contends that he is facing financial difficulties, and that it would not be possible for him to deposit the amount, at a time. While passing the interim order, this Court imposed a condition to the effect that the petitioner shall deposit half of the decretal amount, within four weeks. The condition is said to have been complied with. The balance of the decretal amount can be required to be paid in six equal installments, commencing from July 2010. Hence, the revision is allowed, and the order under revision is set aside, on condition that the petitioner deposits balance of the decretal amount in six equal installments, commencing from July, 2010, payable on or before 10th of every month. If the petitioner commits default in payment of the amount for two consecutive months, the order under revision shall revive, and he shall be liable to be arrested. The respondent shall be entitled to withdraw the amount in deposit, as well as the one, that may be deposited in future, without furnishing any security. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.08-06-2010. KO