IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C. Rev. (T) No. 119 of 2008. Decided on: 29th October, 2010. Asha Devi. ….Petitioner. -Versus- State of H.P. and Others. .…Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No. __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For the respondents. : Mr. P. M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): On the basis of record, learned Additional Advocate General, as noticed in the judgment dated 11.01.2007, has stated that husband of the petitioner stood regularized w.e.f. 01.01.1996 and in sequel thereto, the petitioner shall be entitled to all the monetary benefits which would have accrued to the petitioner’s husband. Case of the petitioner has already been considered for compassionate appointment and she has been offered appointment. In view of this, there is no error apparent on the face of record. However, it is clarified in the interest of justice that the petitioner shall be released all the monetary benefits, as undertaken, within a period of two months from today, if not already released. 2. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge October 29, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?No.