IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 12377 of 2000 Between: Jammula Vishwanadham, S/o Jagannadham, R/o Gandigunta Village, Vuyyuru Mandal, Krishna District ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Government of A.P., Rep by its Dist. Collector, Machilipatnam, Krishna District 2 Sub- Collector, Vijayawada, Krishna District 3 Mandal Revenue Officer, Vuyyuru Mandal, Krishna District 4 Member/Convenor Dist. Committee Sand Quarries & Dist. Panchayat Officer, Krishna District ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: None appeared Counsel for respondents 1 to 3: AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for respondent No.4: None appeared. The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “It is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more fully in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not refunding the E.M.D and also passing order for recovery in Rc.No.D1/4274/2000, dated 10-06-2000 as illegal, improper, arbitrary and unenforceable and direct the respondents to refund the EMD and set aside order dated 10-06-2000 in proceedings No.Rc.D1/4274/2000.” When this writ petition was called in the afternoon of 17-07- 2008, there was no representation for the petitioner. Even today, when the case is called, no one represented the petitioner. Hence, it is reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing his case. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date 18th July, 2008 vrn