IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 31ST OCTOBER 2008 / 9TH KARTHIKA 1930 WP(C).No. 32098 of 2008(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- SUMITHRA, W/O.RAJENDRAN, 'REVATHY' KOONAYIL CHERRY, PARAVUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.V.VENUGOPALAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S): --------------- THE PARUVUR MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, KOLLAM DISTRICT. SHRI.B.SURESH, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P(C).No.32098 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 31st day of October, 2008 J U D G M E N T The petitioner challenges Ext.P6 order, whereby the petitioner has been directed to demolish certain constructions, which, according to the Municipality, are unauthorised. Since against Ext.P6 order the petitioner has an appellate remedy under the Kerala Municipality Act, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition at this stage. The petitioner submits that the petitioner may be given a breathing time to approach the appellate authority for appropriate interim orders. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge Ext.P6 appropriately as provided under the Kerala Municipality Act. To enable the petitioner to seek interim orders in the matter from the appellate authority I direct that Ext.P6 shall not be implemented for a period of two weeks. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge 2