IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 8489 of 2010 Date of Decision: 03.01.2011 Som Nath .... Petitioner Versus Ranbir Singh ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH Present : Mr. Arvind Singh, Advocate for the petitioner 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ALOK SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition is filed challenging the order dated 14.12.2010 passed by Rent Controller, Kurukshetra thereby rejecting the application moved by the defendant-tenant to amend the written statement to incorporate the pleading about the subsequent event i.e. vacation of the another shop during the pendency of the present eviction petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the eviction petition against the petitioner, landlord has got vacated another shop from the another tenant by way of compromise in another eviction petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner further states that if subsequent event is important to decide the present eviction petition, amendment is necessary to be incorporated in the present written statement. C.R. No. 8489 of 2010 2 In the opinion of this Court instead incorporating amendment in the written statement, petitioner shall be at liberty to place on record the certified copy of the eviction order passed in favour of the present landlord in another eviction proceeding. On filing of the certified copy of that order, that shall be taken into account while deciding the eviction petition in accordance with law. Present petition stands disposed of accordingly. (ALOK SINGH) 03.01.2011 JUDGE reena