IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.3718 of 2011 Date of Decision : March 03, 2011. Savinder Singh .....Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Sanjay Dhiman, Advocate, for Mr.Sushil Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Monica Chhibber Sharma, DAG, Punjab. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3 only at this stage. Ms.Monica Chhibber Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on their behalf. Let three copies of the writ petition be handed over to her during the course of day. In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no necessity to issue notice to respondent No.4 nor any counter reply from respondent Nos.1 to 3 is needed at this stage. The petitioner retired from the post of Octroi Clerk from the Municipal Council, Sri Hargobindpur, Tehsil Batala, District Gurdaspur, C.W.P.No .3718 of 2011 2 w.e.f. 31st December, 2007 on attaining the age of superannuation. His grievance is that various service/retiral benefits like medical allowance, LTC, arrears of revised pay scales and of pensionary benefits have not been released to him so far. The petitioner claims his entitlement for these benefits in view of the retrospective revision of pay scales w.e.f. 1.1.2006, namely, prior to his retirement. The petitioner has already made a representation dated 12.7.2010 (Annexure P-1) in this regard. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to consider the aforementioned claim of the petitioner contained in his representation dated 12.7.2010 (Annexure P-1) also and release the due payment within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. In case the petitioner is found to be not entitled to any particular benefit, let a speaking order to that extent be passed within the stipulated period. In the event of further delay, the petitioner shall be entitled to interest @ 6% per annum. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. March 03, 2011 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE