IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.7900 of 2011 Pashupati Nath @ Pinkal, son of Sri Anil Kumar Choudhary, Resident of Mohalla Garikhana, P.S. Khagaul, Dist. Patna. --------- Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar --------- Opp. Party ----------- 3 05.8.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was in fact allowed by order dated 26.3.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. 50257 of 2008 subject to the condition that the petitioner must have not more than two criminal cases pending against him. It, however, transpires that the petitioner has more than two criminal cases against him and as such, when the application was filed by him for modification of the aforementioned order, the same was rejected by an order dated 1.4.2010 in Cr. Misc. No. 41014 of 2009 with a direction to the court below that the trial of the petitioner, keeping in view that he was in custody since 13.3.2008, must be expedited and concluded preferably within a period of six months. When this bail application was filed on 1.3.2011, a report was called for from the trial court as to the present stage of trial 2 and the report, which has been received at Flag-C dated 18.5.2011, would go to show that the case itself was committed to the court of sessions on 5.5.2011. That being so, when the end of the trial of the petitioner is nowhere in sight, this Court considering also the fact that the petitioner was found entitled for grant of bail by this Court earlier, would direct for release of the petitioner, namely, Pashupati Nath @ Pinkal on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Magistrate, 1st Class, Danapur, Patna in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 34 of 2008, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The two bail bonds will be furnished, one by the Government servant and the other by a close family relative. (ii) The petitioner will remain present in course of trial on each and every day and his absence even for a single day would automatically entail the consequences of cancellation of his bail. (iii) The petitioner in case is now made accused in any other criminal case, that 3 would itself lead to cancellation of his bail. Subject to the aforementioned conditions, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Rsh (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)