1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA NOS. 6655/2009 and 6656/2009 and 6654/2009 in SA NO.5/1993 ------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. P.N.Kutti, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. A.N.Nagargoje, Adv., for the respondents. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE:27/8/2009 ... P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. P.N.Kutti, Counsel for the applicants. Mr. A.N.Nagargoje, Counsel, appears for the original appellants. 2. This court, after hearing the Counsel extensively and even on intervals, recorded the order in Second Appeal on 27.2.2009. It is informed now that the legal representatives of deceased/respondent were unaware of the present proceedings. The deceased Vasudeo Hiraman Patil expired on 18.11.1993 and names of his legal representatives are 2 indicated in the certificate. There is inordinate delay in making the application, however, considering the fact situation, the delay is condoned, abatement set aside. The names of legal representatives of deceased Vasudeo Hiraman Patil be brought on record in the Second Appeal. Learned Counsel representing legal representatives waives service in the Second Appeal. Application (No.6655/2009) allowed. Necessary amendment to be carried out within 14 days in the disposed appeal. In order to carry necessary amendment, both the sides seek time to proceed with the two applications. S.O. to 2nd Sept., 2009. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/6655-09ca ...