1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.3795 OF 2009 1. THE BHANDARA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK STAFF ASSOCIATION, THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY MR. R.D.BOHATE, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT RAVINDRANATH TAGORE WARD, BHANDARA. 2. SAU. KALYANI W/O. RAVINDRA NATU, AGED 37 YEARS, OCCU.: SERVICE, R/O. RAVINDRANATH TAGORE WARD, BHANDARA. .. PETITIONERS. // VERSUS // 1. THE BHANDARA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK, BHANDARA, THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER. 2. THE CHAIRMAN, THE BHANDARA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK, BHANDARA. BOTH OFFICES AT CIVIL LINES, COLLEGE ROAD, BHANDARA, TAH. & DISTT. BHANDARA. .... RESPONDENTS. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri S.S.Ghate, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri N.L.Jaiswal h/f. Shri A.M.Ghare, Advocate for Respondents. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 07, 2009. 1. Heard. 2 2. This petition is directed against an interim order passed by learned Member, Industrial Court, Bhandara, rejecting application for interim relief staying transfer of one of the members of the petitioner union viz. Mrs. K.R. Natu. This transfer, by order dated 18th July, 2009, did not indicate any reason but it seems that there were two withdrawals in Bhandara Branch in the month of May, 2009 in respect of which the employee concerned was required to make deposit. In order to inquire into the matter the employee seems to have been transferred to Pauni. The petitioner union challenged the transfer before the Industrial Court and prayed for interim relief, which application was rejected by the learned Member, holding first that if the interim application is allowed, it would amount to granting final relief itself and secondly that for grant of interim relief prima-facie case, that the transfer was effected mala fide, has not been made out. 3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the transfers etc. can be effected as per their circular in the month of May and June, also does not help the petitioner since the circular would refer to general tranfer after completion of tenure at a particular place and would not prevent the management from transferring the employee for administrative exigencies. Without being 3 influenced by his own findings on interim application, the learned Member, Industrial Court would obviously decide the complaint finally on its own merits. With above observations, the petition is dismissed. JUDGE RR.