IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.328 of 2005 ARJUN SINGH SON OF LATE CHANDRAMA SINGH, RESIDENT OF AT, P.O. & P.S. PIRO, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR – PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BHOJPUR. 3. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, PIRO, DISTRICT BHOJPUR. 4. CIRCLE OFFICER, PIRO, BHOJPUR – RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2/ 29-04-2011 Despite repeated calls, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the present writ petition. However, I have heard Mr. Bibhakar Tiwary, learned A.C. to Standing Counsel no. 21. On perusal of the materials available on record, this Court finds that the petitioner had earlier approached this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 12640 of 2001, which was permitted to be withdrawn by order dated 02.11.2001 (Annexure-1) with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority for redressal of his valid grievances. The petitioner claims to have approached respondent- District Collector and his application has been disposed of by order dated 14.02.2004 (Annexure-2). In the writ petition, the petitioner has sought a direction for removal of encroachment from public Dharamshala made by some private persons, but those private persons have not been impleaded as party in the present proceeding. From perusal of the materials on record, this Court does not find any valid cause for approaching this Court once 2 again by the petitioner in the present writ petition. The present writ petition seems to be completely misconceived. It is, accordingly, dismissed. BTiwary/ ( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)