IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8377 of 2010 1. AMIT KUMAR, S/O KAMTA PRASAD SHARMA, R/O VILLAGE DHANGAON, P.S. FATEHPUR, DISTRICT-GAYA----PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,GAYA THROUGH ITS MEMBER, DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,GAYA. 3. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GAYA. 4. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER , FATEHPUR,GAYA. 5. PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT , MATESO, BLOCK FATEHPUR,DISTRICT- GAYA. 6. MUKHIYA,GRAM PANCHAYAT MATASO,BLOCK FATEHPUR,DISTRICT- GAYA--------------------------------RESPONDENTS ----------- 2 28.1.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The tribunal has done no wrong in rejecting the claim of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra now because the post does not exists from 1.7.2006. In view of the above stated position no direction can be given for appointment of the petitioner on the said post and thereafter his absorption on the post as Panchayat teacher whatever the merit of the case otherwise. This writ application is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)