IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI MONDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 15TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 4117 of 2008(M) ------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- V.JAYA, VILLAGE OFFICER MANNAMKANDOM, IDUKKI DIST. BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SURESH (CHIRAKKARA) RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE IDUKKI DIST. 3. DEPUTY COLLECTOR (GENERAL) COLLECTORATE IDUKKI DIST. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BEJOY CHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: V. GIRI ,J. ------------------------------- WP(C).NO. 4117 of 2008 --------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of February, 2008. JUDGMENT The petitioner challenges Ext.P5 order by which she has been transferred from Mannamkandom village office to Anaviratty village office, both within the Idukki District. Though the order is styled as an administrative one, according to the petitioner, it is not so, as is evident from Exts.P3 and P4. I am not inclined to interfere with the order of transfer. But if the petitioner has a grievance against the order of transfer, she is at liberty to move the Commissioner of land Revenue or Government. If a representation is filed by the petitioner before the Government challenging Ext.P5 within one month from today, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law, within one month thereafter, after hearing the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- pmn/ V. GIRI, JUDGE. //true copy// P.S. to Judge.