IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH APRIL 2007 / 20TH CHAITHRA 1929 WA.No. 963 of 2007() -------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN RP.201/2007 IN WPC.NO.24565/2006 Dated 26/02/2007 .................... APPELLANT: 2ND RESPONDENT: -------------------------------------------------- ZAKARIA MATHEW, SENZO ENGINEER (PVT.) LTD., 302-A, EVENING STAR, ANDHERI EAST, MUMBAI. BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR RESPONDENTS: REVIEW PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1,3,4 & 5: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KATHRUKKADAVU, KOCHI-17. 2. MATHAICHAN MATHEW, S/O. MATHEW, MADAPPALLY MATTATHIL MANZOOR P.O., KUTTICKAL, KANJIRAPPALLY, KOTTAYAM, NOW R/AT JUNBILEE SOUDI ARABIA, REP. BY HIS P/A. HOLDER ZAKARIA MATHEW SENZO ENGINEERING (P)LTD., 302 A, EVENING STAR, REHEJA VIHAR COMPLEX, ANDERI (E), MUMBAI. 3. THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 5. N.RAMACHANDRAN, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ADMINISTRATION, KOTTAYAM. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K. MEERA BY ADV. SRI. S. SREEKUMAR, SC, C.B.I. THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, AG.C.J. & M.N. KRISHNAN,J. = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.A. NO. 963 OF 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 10th day of April, 2007. J U D G M E N T Radhakrishnan, Ag.C.J. This appeal is preferred against the order in R.P.201/07 in WPC 24565/06. The writ petition was preferred seeking C.B.I. Investigation into the allegations raised by the 1st petitioner. The learned Single Judge after considering all the materials directed the CBI to investigate the cases. Against which the CBI filed R.P. 201/07 which was disposed of stating that further investigation of the Crimes will be continued by the 5th respondent. Against that decision the appellant has come up with this appeal. We do not find any infirmity in the order passed by the learned Single Judge on 26th February, 2007. The appeal, therefore, lacks merit and the same is dismissed. K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE. M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE. ul/-