BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twelfth day of September Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT THE HON`BLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA CRL OP(MD) No.12031 of 2011 MATHAVAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERALAM POLICE STATION, PERALAM, TIRUVARUR DISTRICT. IN CRIME NO.335 OF 2011. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. T.MURUGANANTHAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/accused was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 26.08.2011 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b) (ii) (B) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, in Crime No.335 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that on 26.08.2011 the respondent police conducted a search and the petitioner is found in possession of 1.100kgs of Ganja without any valid license, which is below the commercial quantity and he was arrested and remanded into judicial custody on 16.08.2011, and he is in custody for more than 13 days and hence, he prays for enlargement on bail. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner was arrested on 26.08.2011 and he was found in possession 1.100kgs of Ganja which is below the commercial quantity and the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application. 4. Considering the rival submissions made by both sides the occurrence took place on 26.08.2011 the petitioner has possessed 1.100kgs of Ganja which is below the commercial quantity and he was arrested on 26.08.2011 and the investigation is considerably over, I am inclined to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nannilam and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. sd/- 12/09/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANNILAM. 2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJORE. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PERALAM POLICE STATION, PERALAM,TIRUVARUR DISTRICT. 5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. T.MURUGANANTHAM Advocate SR.No.31187 GH : 14.09.2011 : 2p/7c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.12031 of 2011 Date :12/09/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/