IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30635 of 2008 SRI KANT YADAV & ANR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 13.8.2008 Heard. The petitioners are in custody since 18.4.2008 in a case under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code relating to the loot of properties from a vehicle. The tyre of the vehicle was punctured and it was standing for repair at the place where the occurrence took place. The police reached there while the offenders were still engaged in robbing the occupants of the vehicle and on chase one Sadhu and accused Devendra Kumar were arrested. The sadhu was let off on the plea that he had himself been robbed. Some properties were recovered from the arrested accused Devendra Kumar, who disclosed the names of other accused persons which included the two petitioners. The simple contention is that in order to establishing the identities of the two petitioners it was necessary that the petitioners ought to have been put on T.I.P. as there was no recovery from them nor there was any arrest from the spot. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case and the contention, let petitioners, namely, Sri Kant Yadav and Dharmendra Pawan, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in connection with Arwal P. S. case no.1 of 2008. sudip ( Dharnidhar Jha,J )