IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 21ST JULY 2011 / 30TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 19921 of 2011(M) --------------------- PETITIONER : -------------------- ANIRUGHAN R., DRAWING TEACHER (HIGH SCHOOL), GOVERNMENT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KUTTIPPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.C.ANILKUMAR (KALLESSERIL) SRI.C.Y.VINOD KUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM. 4. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR. R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. V. VIJULAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21/07/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/- WP(C).No. 19921 of 2011(M) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE ORDER NO. A3/6891/2010 DATED 16.7.2010 ISSUED BY THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM. EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE REVISED STAFF FIXATION ORDER NO. A1/5679/2011 DATED 10.6.2011 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT ABOLISHING THE POST OF DRAWING TEACHER. EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 23.6.2011. EXT.P4 : COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 24.6.2011 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT GOVERNMENT. EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15.7.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT . RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 19921 of 2011-M - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of July, 2011. JUDGMENT The petitioner is working as Drawing Teacher in Government Higher Secondary School, Kuttippuram. The present grievance raised is with regard to the staff fixation order, Ext.P2. By Ext.P2 order, the post of Drawing Teacher sanctioned in the high school section stands abolished, for the reason that the periods available do not warrant sanctioning of a second post of specialist teacher. Challenging the same, the petitioner has filed a revision petition before the Director of Public Instruction as well as a representation before the Government, copies of which are produced as Exts.P3 and P4. 2. Ext.P5 is a copy of the representation submitted by the petitioner before the Deputy Director of Education pointing out that in the light of the pendency of the revision petition, he may not be transferred from the present station. Evidently, these are matters for the respective authorities to consider. 3. Ext.P3 being a revision petition, the same will be disposed of by the Director of public Instruction after notice to the parties concerned wpc 19921/2011 2 including the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. 4. The petitioner's representation Ext.P5 to the Deputy Director, is to keep in abeyance the impending transfer. The Deputy Director of Education will consider the same and if a transfer is imminent, the question whether the petitioner could be retained in a nearby school, also will be considered. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) kav/