HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD Dated: 21-07-2010 WRIT APPEAL No. 1107 OF 2004 Between: The Indian Bank, 3-6-150, Himayathnagar Branch, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad, rep., by its Chief Manager and another ... APPELLANTS AND Indian Bank Employees Union (A.P), reg. No. 1027, rep., by its General Secretary, Mr. P.V. Krishna Rao, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, aged: 45 years, Banjara Sadan, Narayana Guda, Hyderabad – 500 029 and two others ... RESPONDENTS HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD WRIT APPEAL No. 1107 OF 2004 JUDGMENT: (per Sri B. Prakash Rao, J) Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. This writ appeal arises out of order dated 04-11-2003 in WPMP No. 7813 of 2003 and WVMP No. 2057 of 2003 in Writ Petition No. 5954 of 2003. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein filed the said writ petition to declare the action of the appellants and respondent No. 3 in withdrawing the special allowance to respondent No.2 Sri Sham Sundara Rao, Telex Operation H.O.S.R No.15404 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct the appellants to pay special allowance to him. The learned single Judge on 08-04-2003 while admitting the writ petition granted interim direction which was subsequently made absolute on 04-11-2003. Hence this writ appeal. Shorn of all the details, it is seen that on 22-07-2004 this Court while admitting the appeal granted interim suspension of the impugned order i.e., almost six years back. Therefore, we are of the opinion that the main writ petition itself is to be heard as expeditiously as possible. In view of the same, we do not find any reason to interfere with the matter at this stage. However, it is made clear that the interim order of suspension granted by this Court shall continue to be in force till the disposal of the writ petition. Office is directed to post the writ petition along with connected writ petition bearing No.5983 of 2003 before the learned single Judge hearing the matters next week subject to part heard. The writ appeal is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. B. PRAKASH RAO, J G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J 21-07-2010 ks