IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5236 of 2011 Sri Veda Nand Thakur, Son of Late Shashi Nath Thakur, resident of Village-Ganoul, P.O. Narayanpur, P.S. Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur ------------------- Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. The Secretary, Higher Education, Department of Human Resources and Development , Govt. of Bihar,Patna 3. The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur through its Vice-Chancellor 4. The Vice-Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 5. The Registrar, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 6. The Finance Officer, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 7. The Principal, G.B.College, Naugachia, Bhagalpur -------------------------------- Respondents. ----------- 02 24-03-2011 Heard Sri Abdul Manan Khan , learned counsel, who was assisted by Sri Suman Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner , Sri Ashok Kumar Keshri, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent nos.3 to 7/ Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University and Sri Ajit Kumar, learned A.C. to Advocate General, who appears on behalf of Respondent nos. 1 and 2. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 31.12.2004, while functioning as Reader in G.B.College, Naugachia, Bhagalpur, has prayed for directing the Respondents to make payment of arrear of Pension, Gratuity, Leave Encashment, Group Insurance and other retiral dues with statutory interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a representation before the authority concerned. However, no decision has been taken till date. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is 2 being disposed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before Respondent no.4 i.e. the Vice-Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, Respondent no.4 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law redressing the grievances of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If Respondent no.4 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass appropriate order regarding clearance of the admissible dues within the aforesaid time. The petitioner shall also be entitled to get admissible statutory interest. In case of refusal, Respondent no.4 is directed to pass speaking order within the aforesaid time. With above observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)