C.W.P. No. 965 of 2006 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh C.W.P. No. 965 of 2006 Date of decision:19-03-2008 Joginder Singh and others .....Petitioners Vs. The Superintending Canal Officer and others ....Respondents .... Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.S.Garewal Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Daya Chaudhary Present: Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate, for the respondents K.S.GAREWAL, J. This petition has been filed by Joginder Singh and six others to challenge the order dated September 17, 2004 passed by Division Canal Officer, Majitha Annexure P-1 and the the appellate order passed by Superintending Canal Officer on November 24, 2005 Annexure P-3. Mangal Singh respondent No.3 had filed an application before Divisional Canal Officer for inclusion of 31 Kanals-16 Marlas of his land in the command area of outlet 11465-R. The application was heard by the Divisional Canal Officer who got the inquiry conducted from Ziledar who reported that the said area may be included in outlet 11245-R, instead of 11465-R as originally prayed for. The Divisional Canal Officer heard the shareholders whose main objection was that the addition of the applicant's area would reduce the discharge which was already low but this objection was not accepted. Therefore, the recommendation was made to include the C.W.P. No. 965 of 2006 2 area of respondent No.3 in outlet No.11245. In the appeal filed by the petitioner, the Superintending Canal Officer considered the petitioners' statement that they would have no objection if their 14 acres land is included in the outlet. The Superintending Canal Officer noted that the petitioner had themselves asked for inclusion of 14 acres in outlet 11245, therefore, their objection was baseless. We have gone through the order of the Superintending Canal Officer and found no legal or jurisdictional error therein which may call for interference. This petition is dismissed. ( K.S.GAREWAL) JUDGE (DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE March 19,2008 RSK NOTE: Whether to be referred to the Reporter or not?