M IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDITURE AT BILASPUR L l MISC APPEAL N0. 2%] 0f2002 APPLLANT/ DEFENDANT SUSHREE TAMANNA DAUGHTER F MOHD. SAEED AGD ABOUT 22 YEARS RESIDENT OF BYRON BAZAR, CITY, TAHSIL & DISTRICT - RAIPR VERSUS u‘ RESPoNDENT win-AT / PLAINTIFF SHIEKH SAIFUDDIN SON OF SHRI SHEIKH MASIHUDDIN AGED ABOUT ‘26 YEARS RESIDENT OF BHARTI NAGAR, CITY, TAHSIL & DISICT - BILPUR .. I? g/ “(17 ,Vue ' F “‘ gab ’ ...--""‘ E19 N"""'LM €17 N/..\....... N“ 7L dé ”d APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 111 1D! OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908 K & E O E U M TR AS < . > m $¢\e>?’\©9 'XI-HC——78 mm m 200 $ MW (Wu) a é § . $WW wm .L{(gmamm “mt“giaaQ $331Fatt m S B Hon’ble Shri Justice N K A arwai 28.07.2009 Shri Kshitiz Sharma, Advoc ate for the appellant. Shri AS Ansari, Advocate fer the respondent. Shri Ansari, learned coun I appearing for the respondent shBrnits that the parties have ent red into outside the compromise court, and therefore, the appeal h s become infructuous. Based on statement of Shri Ansari at bar this appeal is tiable to be dismissed as having becom infructuous, as the parties have already entered into compromise. , Accordingly, the appeal i dismissed as having become s infructuous. No order asto costs. i1; Sd/— Sahu l N. K. Agarwalcmn" r Judge