1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.3490 OF 2009 1. THE SECRETARY, BHOSLA EDUCATION SOCIETY, MAHAL, NAGPUR. 2. BHOSLA ADHYAPAK VIDYALAYA, THR. ITS H.M. NEW NANDANWAN, NAGPUR. .. PETITIONER/S // VERSUS // 1. MISS. JYOTSANA GIRDHARI BANDEBUCHE, AGED ABOUT 29 YRS. OCCU. : NIL, R/O. PLOT NO.19, KIRTI NAGAR, NAGPUR. .... RESPONDENTS. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. ______________________________________________________________________________ Shri S.W.Sambre, Advocate for Petitioners. CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATED : AUGUST 24, 2009. 1. Heard. 2. This petition, by management, is directed against order passed by School Tribunal, Nagpur in Appeal No. 60/2001 whereby the learned Presiding Officer granted 75% 2 of back wages to respondent No.1 Jyotsna Giridhar Bandabuche. The petitioner had terminated services of respondent Jyotsna and she had filed an appeal before the School Tribunal, which the School Tribunal had allowed. The School Tribunal by its order dated 24.07.2003 had granted reinstatement with back wages to the respondent. The petitioners preferred petition before this Hon’ble Court bearing Writ Petition No. 3570 of 2004, which was decided by judgment dated 14th February, 2007. Since the respondent had got alternate employment on 13.02.2004 she did not seek reinstatement and restricted claim of back wages to the period from 14.08.2001 till her oral termination dated 12.02.2004. This Court set aside the order of the School Tribunal granting full back wages and remanded the matter back to the School Tribunal for giving parties opportunity in this respect and to find out that the respondent is entitled for full back wages from 14.08.2001 to 12.02.2004. The learned Presiding Officer of the School Tribunal noted that the respondent had received honorarium @ Rs.20/- per period, totalling to Rs.2,222/- for the entire period from 14.08.2001 to 12.02.2004, & therefore, granted 3 back wages @ 75% to the respondent. It is not shown that the respondent had got a higher amount or higher percentage of the emoluments to which she was not otherwise entitled, in order to reduce this amount of 75% of back wages. In view of this the petition is dismissed. JUDGE RR.