A HIGHjCOUKTpFJUDICATURECKHATTJSGARHlBil^^^^ DIVISIQNBENCH CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI S.R. NAYAK, CJ & HON'BLE SHRI D.R. DESHMUKH, J. lyiJsc.Apoea! N0.1262 QF 2005 APPELLANT CLAIMANT Nawal kishor Pandey, S/o Pushpanad pandey, aged 37 yrs. Occupation- Sub-Engineer, R/o-54/1425, Tarun Nagar, Dangania, Raipur, Tah. & Distt. Raipur (C.G.) RESPgNDENTS VERSUS 1. Ashok Kumar Bagh, S/o Padmalochar Bagh, Aged 23 yrs, R/o near Ramadh Mandir, Fafadih, Raipur, Tah.& Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 Masers Bulchand Indermal, Through - Managing Director-Masers Bulchand Indermal, R/o-Nemechand Street, Ganjpara, Raipur, Tah. & Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. The New India Insurance, Co. Ltd. Through - Div. Manager, Div. Office, Katchery Chowk, Jail Road, Rajpur (C.G.) Present: MrA.S. Iqbal, learned counsel for the appellant. QRALORDER (Passed on 31st January 2006) Thefollowing oral orderofthe Court was passed by D.R. DESHMUKH, J . This is a personal injury case. The appellant is said to have suffered permanent disabiiity of 60%. The MACT has awarded Rs. 1,40.000/- as compensation, being Rs. 20,000/- towards loss of income, Rs. 5000/- towards pain and suffering, Rs. 50,000/- towards actual expenses incurred in treatment and Rs. 60,000/- forthe disability ---2.- ^ t. 5^fcH ^, e suffered by the appellant. The only point urged by learned counsel for the appellant is that the appellant had incurred expenses to the tune of Rs. 2,00,000/- and had also furnished the bills towards purchase of medicines, yet the same was not considered. However, upon perusal of the record of the MACT in claim case No. 53/2004, we find that neither the appellant filed prescriptions for those medicines nor examined the doctor concerned to prove the same. In the absence of such evidence, the compensation awarded by the MACT cannot be faulted with. No other point was urged before us. Consequently, the appeal is devoid of merit and it is accordingly dismissed, No costs. Sd/- Chief Justice Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge