IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No. 22501 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION : 05.12.2011 Vikas Kumar .... PETITIONER Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and another ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH Present: Mr. Rajeev Kaswan, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. Petitioner Vikas Kumar has filed the instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction to the respondents to consider his claim for allotment of Industrial plot in Sectors 27 & 28, Hisar, in view of the similar directions issued by this Court vide order dated 9.9.2011 (Annexure P-5) passed in CWP No. 12443 of 2008, titled as Manoj Aggarwal Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority and another, whereby a bunch of ten writ petitions was disposed of. It is the case of the petitioner that in the year 2007, the Haryana Urban Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as `the HUDA') had advertised for allotment of Industrial plots of different size in Sectors 27 CWP No. 22501 of 2011 -2- and 28, Hisar. The petitioner had applied against the Industrial plot of one acre, for which only one plot was advertised. His claim was considered by the Plot Allotment Committee, HUDA in that category. He was called for interview and ultimately in the year 2007 itself, vide result (Annexure P-4), instead of one plot, ten plots of one acre size were allotted to ten different persons. The claim of the petitioner against all the ten plots was considered. The petitioner did not challenge the said allotment. Now after four years, he has filed the instant petition pleading that some of the persons, who had applied for plots of different sizes, filed separate writ petitions in this court, which were ultimately disposed of by this Court vide order dated 9.9.2011 (Annexure P-5), while making the following observations : “In the affidavit, it is stated that a Committee has been constituted which shall convene a meeting on 22.11.2011 at 10.30 A.M in the Conference Room in HUDA Headquarters at Panchkula to reconsider the case of the petitioner for allotment of a plot. We feel that in view of undertaking given, the present writ petition has become infructuous. We are hopeful that the respondent-HUDA Authorities will not sit on false prestige and will consider the case of the petitioner in a very sympathetic manner and decide the same as per law. The petitioners in all these writ petitions are directed to put in appearance before the concerned Committee on the date and time mentioned above.” Now, the petitioner has filed the instant petition praying that this petition be also disposed of with the similar observations. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, at this belated CWP No. 22501 of 2011 -3- stage (even the date of convening of meeting of the Committee, i.e. 22.11.2011, has expired), we are not inclined to entertain this petition and dispose of the same with the similar observations. There may be other applicants, who are situated similar to the petitioner, who can also be considered against the available plots in the said category. If we dispose of this petition with the aforesaid observations, those persons may be deprived of consideration, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain this petition. Dismissed. However, it will be open for the petitioner to make a representation to the HUDA authorities to consider his claim and claim of the similarly situated other persons, for allotment of available plots in the category of one acre in Sectors 27 & 28, Hisar. If any such representation is made by the petitioner, we hope the HUDA authorities will consider the same in accordance with law. ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE December 05, 2011 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) ndj JUDGE