HIGH C‘QURT SF JUWCA‘TURE €HHATTE$GAF<H: B§LA§§UR $iN§ILE BENSH : H§W5LE §HRE $.R. NA?A TEJ K. W.P. 1m i‘ig. . (3‘? 2%6 é% i z ‘ Seif Heip Group‘ Sirkoiga, Vikashané Udavwr i Lakhanpur. Through: its Presédent nameiy Jugeshwar Ram Slo. shri Mohan Ram Aged about 40 years, R/o. Viilage Sirkcianga, Pest Lahpatra, District Surguja (CG) VERSUS Sta'ie o? Chhaifisgarh Through: R§3P$MDEMT$ i. Secretaw, Depariment of Food, Civil Suppiies & Consuma Proiection Department, DKS. Bhawan, Ra§pur (CG) Coltecioy (Food), Ambikapur, ’ District $wguja (CG) Sub Divisicma! Officen Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) The District Feed Officei', Ambikapur, Disirici Surguja (CG) PE?§TEGNER Preeent: Shri Vaibhav Goverd‘nan, iearned couneei ior the petitianer. Shri Sanjay S. Agrawai‘ ieameci GA. for the respandents. GRAL OR§ER gPassed 5n 15“ November, 20%) The grievance of the petitioner is that the authorization gran‘ied to it - for running fair price shop has been canceiied by the Sub Divisienal Officer‘ Ambikapur‘ the third responcieht herein, vicie order d‘aiee 18/7f2006 without giving oppartunity of beihg heard is the peritioner. The material pieced before the Court wouid show that the notice was not served on the petitioner nor any opportunity was given to it before passing the adverse order. in that View of the matter, the impugned order cannot be sustained. (2) in the resutt, the writ petition is atiowed and the impugned order is quashed. No costs. This om’er, however, shati not come in the way of the third respondent issuing notice to the petitioner with regard to the aiiegations and passing appropriate order attet hearing the petitioner. Sdl- Chief Justice