RFA No.554 of 2000 (O&M) -1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.3643-CI of 2008 and RFA No.554 of 2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 31.10.2008 Sangeeta Chopra and others ..Appellants. Vs. State of Haryana and another ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.Rajesh Gupta, Advocate for the applicants-appellants. Ms.Mamta Singla Talwar, AAG Haryana for the respondents. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. CM No.3643-CI of 2008 This is an application under Section 151 CPC for disposal of the main appeal in terms of the order passed in CA No.9808 of 2003 titled as Vinod Bansal Vs. State of Haryana and another decided on 27.10.2004. With the consent of both the parties, the main appeal is taken on record. RFA No.554 of 2000 Land measuring 486.61 acres situated in village Mewla Maharajpur, Tehsil and District Faridabad was notified under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short the `Act') on 7.9.1992. The Land Acquisition Collector awarded compensation @ Rs.1,96,000/- per acre vide his award dated 8.2.1995. On reference under Section 18 of the Act, the Reference Court determined the compensation @ Rs.325/- per square yard, RFA No.554 of 2000 (O&M) -2 - however, the same was reduced by the High Court to the tune of Rs.90/- per square yard. Some of the land-owners approached the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.9808 of 2003 titled as Vinod Bansal Vs. State of Haryana and another against the judgment of the High Court, which was allowed and the impugned order was set aside. The matter was remitted back to the Reference Court in the light of the findings recorded by the Supreme Court. Both the parties are ad idem that the present case is squarely covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.9808 of 2003 titled as Vinod Bansal Vs. State of Haryana and another decided on 27.10.2004. In view of the above, the present appeal is also disposed of in the same terms. (Rakesh Kumar Jain) 31.10.2008 Judge Meenu