WPSS No. 1167 of 2009 With Int. Relief App. 10564 / 09 [ Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. S.S. Yadav, Advocate present for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the State present for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged clause (ii) of advertisement dated 29.11.2005. A further mandamus has been sought directing the respondent No. 2 to grant relaxation to the petitioner as is provided in advertisement dated 29.11.2005. Also, mandamus has been sought directing the respondent No. 2 to permit the petitioner to appear in the interview on the basis of the facts and circumstances of the case. From the perusal of the papers on record, it appears that in pursuance to the advertisement dated 29.11.2005, selection process has already been completed. The order dated 01.11.2007, passed by this Court, in Writ Petition No. 737 (S/S) of 2006 (copy of which is Annexure –1 to the writ petition) itself shows that the selected candidates have already been given appointment. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that infact, the petitioner by means of this writ petition is challenging the advertisement dated 5th of October 2009 (copy of which is Annexure –7 to the writ petition) and not the advertisement dated 29.11.2005 (copy of which is Annexure –4 to the writ petition). From the perusal of the advertisement dated 5th of October 2009, it appears that a candidate must have completed 18 years of age on 1st of July 2009, and should not have crossed age of 35 years, on said date. The affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner Ajay Kumar Katiyar with this writ petition shows that he is aged 39 years. As such, the petitioner appears to be not fulfilling the condition mentioned in the advertisement. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is a member belonging to Other Backward Class, but that of U.P. The age relaxation given in clause (iv) of the advertisement dated 05.10.2009 is available only to the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes of the State of Uttarakhand. In view of the above, this Court does not find any sufficient reason to grant relief sought in the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed summarily. (Interim Relief Application No. 10564 of 2009 also stands dismissed). (P.C. P., J.) 04.12.2009 HN