IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Stay Application NO.6501 of 2010 In Writ Petition No.657 of 2010 (S/S) Rakesh Yadav, S/o Sri Balveer Singh Yadav, R/o Nanakmatta Tehsil, Sitarganj, District Udham Singh Nagar. ……Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ….Respondents. Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.C. Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State-respondents. Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer only to relief No.2 and submits that the writ petition may be disposed of finally today itself at the admission stage. Prayer No.2 in the writ petition has been made to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 03.06.2010, annexed as annexure No.4 to the writ petition. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that if the order is passed to decide the representation, he has no objection. The prayer made by the petitioner is innocuous in nature. The respondent No.2 i.e. District Education Officer, Udham Singh Nagar, is directed to take decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 03-06-2010 annexed as annexure No.4 to the writ petition, expeditiously preferably, within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the said direction, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Stay Application stands disposed of accordingly. (B.S.Verma, J.) 06-08-2010 MK