p HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH; BILASPUP. W.P. {S} 110.219 1 [2008 1. Rameshwar Prasad Upadhyay Petitioners S/ o. Shn' Ganes Prasad Upadhyay Age about 50 years, ASst. Teacher, Govt. Pn‘maty School, Matiya, Block— Saza, Distt. Durg (C.G.) 2. Ram Sohagil Mali S/o. Shn' Kunjan Lal Mali Asst. Teacher, Govt. ?rimary School, Budhwala, Block-Saza, Distt. Durg {c.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS l State Govt. ofChhattisgarh Through : Secretéiy, Education 8a Tribal Department, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.} Distn'ct Education Officer Bemetara, DiStt. —Dm‘g (C. G.) Agpearance : Shri Sognkajnt Velma, counsei for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the respoadents/ Sfate on advance copy. oRAL oRDER 115.04.20031 UNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue volved in the case is as to whether the petitioners are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of Inmal appointment or nom the dateof completion of probation period. He submits that the issue involved herein was considered by the Madhya Pmdesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in O.A. No, ‘2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. 8a others), wherein, it was held that the similarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of 1mt1al appoinhnent. The matter was taken up to the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special . Leave Petition (Civil) No.6892/93. The said petiu‘on was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court upholding the decision of the /// // . " 8 * ,. i 3 é t Tribunal to the e bct that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are emitled to regular pay scale mm the date of initial appoinunent. Learned counsel for the peu'tioners further submits that this Court, while considering the same issue in Ram Kumar Sahu 8b ofhers Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & another (W.P.(s) No.813 of 2007) by order dated 12.02.2007, has granted regular pay scale w.e.f. date of initia1 appointment. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that this case is squarely coveted by the decision of this Court in the case of Ram Kumar Sahu and another (Supra). In View of that, this petin'on is allowed in the same terms. - V However, this order shall be subject to all verihcations ‘ '\ made by the State regarding facts’pleaded in the petition 1 E Sd/- i i Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge