IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.38837 of 2010 AKHILESH KUMAR @ AKHILESH KUMAR RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 27.10.10. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 17.05.2010 in a case registered under Sections 395 and 397 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that on pistol point 12,44,000/rupees was robbed from the cashier of the Bank. The petitioner’s name sprang up on confession of co-accused. The robbed money was recovered from possession of Babloo Kumar Singh. From the impugned order, it appears that the alleged money was recovered on confession of petitioner. It is further submitted that it was only confession before the police and no recovery was made from possession of the petitioner. The statement has been made in paragraph no.12 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount 2 each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 144 of 2010. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)