IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.1605 OF 2010 Between: Ch. Digambhar, S/o. Lakshman ..... PETITIONER AND The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nirmal, Adilabad District and another ....RESPONDENTS The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.1605 OF 2010 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel. 2. The writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondent No.1 in suspending the authorization of the petitioner vide proceedings No.C/158/2010, dated 22.01.2010, without affording opportunity for personal hearing and without furnishing the copy of the report of the Tahsildhar, Tanoor Mandal, Adilabad District i.e., respondent No.2 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently to set aside the same by directing the respondents to continue the petitioner as Fair Price Shop Dealer in Bember Village, Tanoor Mandal, Adilabad District and pass such other suitable orders. 3. Several facts had been narrated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. 4. This Court is not inclined to express any opinion touching the merits and demerits. However, it is stated that even as on today the petitioner is distributing the essential commodities. The same is recorded. 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the considered opinion that the writ petition be disposed of directing respondent No.1 to complete the enquiry within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till the completion of the enquiry, let the petitioner be permitted to distribute the essential commodities. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________ P.S. NARAYANA, J February 01, 2010 Note: Issue operative portion by wire at party’s cost. B/O.MD