IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.9308 of 2000 Between: 1 Pachipala Chalapathi Rao, S/o.Late Suranna, Full Time Masalchi, Principal Junior Civil Judge's Court, Kovvur, R/o.Meraka Street, Near Vinayaka Temple, Kovvur, W.G.Dist. 2 P.Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Ullaki, Full Time Gardner, District Court, Eluru R/o.Ramachandraraopet, Near Shankermuttam, Eluru, W.G.District. 3 P.Subba Rao, S/o.Late Ramulu, Full Time Water Boy, District Court, Eluru, R/o.Ramachandraraopet, Near Shankermuttam, Eluru, W.G.District. 4 N.Balaiah, S/o.Late Ramulu, Full Time Masalchi, Principal Junior Civil Judge's Court, Tanuku, R/o.H.No.10-135,Old Town, Peravali Road, Tanuku, W.G.District. 5 Gurajala Venkateswara Rao, S/o.Pentaiah, Full Time Masalchi, Senior Civil Judge's Court, Tanuku, R/o.Undrajavarapu Road, Tanuku, W.G.District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Judge, W.G.District, at Eluru. 2 The Registrar (Administration), High Court of A.P., High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 3 State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary to Government, Finance & Planning (FW) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not regularising the services of the petitioners as A.P. Last Grade Servants and not giving them the benefits to which they are eligible under GO.Ms.Nos.184 and 112, as arbitrary, and illegal, unfair, unjust and unreasonable and discriminatory, opposed to the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and issue a consequential direction to the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioners as A.P. Last Grade Servants and give them all consequential benefits from the respective dates on which they completed 10 years of service as full-time contingent employees. Counsel for the Petitioners :Mr.S.UDAYACHALA RAO Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr.C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Counsel for Respondent No.3 : G.P. FOR FINANCE & PLANNING. The Court made the following : ORALORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition, and, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the same. Permission sought for is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ____________________ (DEVINDER GUPTA, C.J.) 27th October 2004. __________________ (C.V.RAMULU, J.) ARS To 1 The District Judge, W.G.District, Eluru. 2 The Registrar (Administration), High Court of A.P., High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. 3 Secretary to Government, State of Andhra Pradesh, Finance & Planning (FW) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 4 Section Officer, Legal Cell, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 5 Two CD copies.