-1- IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD FARAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET CONTINUATION SHEET FIRST FIRST FIRST APPEAL NO.1439 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.1439 OF 2006 APPEAL NO.1439 OF 2006 Sangita Rangnath Bhojane & Ors. ...Appellants vs. Suman Rangnath Bhojane & Ors. ...Respondents Ms Neeta Karnik for the Appellants Mr.S.V.Pitre and Mr.Subramaniyam for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. A.S.OKA, J. DATED: DATED: DATED: JULY 31, 2006. JULY 31, 2006. JULY 31, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. In view of the decision of this Court in case of Vitthal R. Mali and others vs. Laxmi G. Mali and others reported in (2006) 4 Bombay Cases Reporter page 31, Appeal in this Court is not maintainable. By the impugned Judgment and Order, the learned II Joint Civil Judge (Senior Division) has granted succession certification under section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. As the Appeal is not maintainable in this Court, office is directed to return the Memorandum of Appeal with all its accompaniments as well as Civil Application to the Advocate for the Appellants for presentation to the proper court. 3. Ad-interim relief granted on 14th October 2005 will continue to operate for a period of eight weeks from today to enable the Appellants to take appropriate steps. -2- Judge. Judge. Judge.