AB 2169/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE IA ANSARI This is an application made under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail by the petitioner, namely, Md. Muktar Ali, in connection with Patacharkuch i Police Station Case No. 217/2010, under Sections 366(A)/34 IPC. Perused the above application and materials on record. Perused also the relevant case diary, including a copy of the order, dated 10-06-2011, passed in AB No. 1434 of 2011, whereby the petitioner’s prayer for pre-arrest bail was rej ected, because of incriminating materials available in the case diary against th e petitioner. However, at the instance of the petitioner, the case diary has, on ce again, been called and perused. Heard Mr. S Sarma, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and M s. A Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. In view of the fact that the case diary reveals sufficient incriminating materia ls against the petitioner and the alleged victim is still untraced, this Court i s of the view that in the facts and attending circumstances of the present case, the petitioner cannot be given the benefit of pre-arrest bail. In the result and for the foregoing reasons, the prayer for pre-arrest bail, mad e by the petitioner, is hereby rejected. With the above observations and directions, this anticipatory bail petition shal l stand disposed of.