IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2010 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1932 RP.No. 434 of 2007(G) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.27994/2006 Dated 13/03/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER ------------------------------------------- G.BABU, DRAFTSMAN GRADE II(MECHANICAL ENGINEERING), TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL, MULANTHURUTHI. BY ADV. SRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION(J) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY G.P. SRI.K.C.SANTHOSH KUMAR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. .................................................................... R.P. No.434 of 2007 in W.P.(C) No.27994 of 2006 .................................................................... Dated this the 7th day of December, 2010. ORDER The petitioner in the W.P.(C) has filed the R.P. stating that he is not a Workshop Instructor whose cases are disposed of through the common judgment in batch case. According to the petitioner, he is a Draftsman seeking time bound grade promotion for which W.P.(C) was filed. However, this was not brought to the notice of the court when the W.P.(C) was disposed of along with batch case. Since the facts based on which judgment is rendered are not applicable to the petitioner, Review Petition is allowed vacating the judgment in W.P. (C) No.27994/2006 with direction to the Registry to post the W.P.(C) in the usual course before the concerned Bench. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge pms