IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9125 of 2011 JAGESHWAR MANDAL Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 29.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State. It would appear from perusal of First Information Report that informant’s daughter aged about 30 years developed some pain in her abdomen and when she was examined by the doctor, it was detected that she was carrying foetus of three months and, thereafter, she hinted the informant that petitioner and two others persons had committed rape on her, admittedly, the victim is dumb lady. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case on account of land dispute, and, moreover, except the informant none had stated about the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Jageshwar Mandal be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Harlakhi P.S. Case no.87 of 2010. PN (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)