IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO.586 OF 200 CRI.APPLICATION NO.586 OF 200 CRI.APPLICATION NO.586 OF 2009 Sanjay D Ajmera, .. Applicant Vs Union of India and Ors. .. Respondent. Mr Uday P.Warunjikar, for the applicant. Ms Bhagyashree Joshi i/b D.N.Salvi, for the respondent. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, APP, for the respondent-State. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE,J. DATE : 06/04/200 DATE : 06/04/200 DATE : 06/04/2009 PC: PC: PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent. 2. By this application, the applicant has prayed for relaxation of the bail condition, restricting foreign travel, imposed in case No.18/RA/2006 by the learned A.C.M.M, 3rd Court, Esplanade, Mumbai, and permitting the applicant to make short business trips abroad within a period of six months. It appears that the Addl.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 3rd Court, Esplanade, Mumbai, vide his order dated 28.1.08 had granted the prayer, as made in the present application. However, the applicant did not go abroad after that order. Thereafter, once again the applicant approached the court for the very same prayer, which the learned Judge rejected vide order dated 20.1.2009. Mr Warunjikar submits that the second application was filed on wrong advise, and it was not necessary for the applicant to file such an application since there was already an order passed by the court (order dated 28.2.2008) on his earlier application. Mr Salvi, learned counsel for the respondent, fairly submitted that they have no objection if the applicant is allowed to travel abroad in pursuance of the order dated 28.1.2008. Mr Warunjikar, also prayed for allowing the applicant to withdraw his application bearing Notice no.9/N/2009 in C.C.No.18/RA/2006 and for setting aside the order dated 20.1.2009. 3. Having considered overall facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I am inclined to grant the prayer made in the present application. Hence, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The period of six months in the prayer clause (a) shall operate from the date of his departure provided he leaves this country for short business trip within one month from today. In other words, in any case this order shall not operate after seven months from today. In view of this order, the order dated 20.1.2009 passed by learned ACMM, 3rd Court, Esplanade, Mumbai, renders ineffective (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)