IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No.22557 of 2004 Between: Sona Rani Lodha, D/o. Mahaveer Tuljaram, Aged about 19 years, Occu: Student-B.Tech.II year, R/o.1-24/1, Nanakramguda (v), Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. Government of Andhra Pradesh rep., by Principal Secretary, Backward Class Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad. 3. The Convenor, EAMCET-2002 (Admissions) and Commissioner of Technical Education, Sanketika Vidya Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 4. The Controller of Examinations, University Campus, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad. 5. The Principal, G. Narayanamma Institute of Engineering and Technology, Shaikhpet, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to announce the results of the petitioner which are withheld and permit the petitioner to pursue her studies in B.Tech course till finalization of her caste claim by holding the action of the respondents in not finalizing her caste claim in accordance with law and not allowing the petitioner to pursue her studies during the pendency of her caste claim as bad, illegal, irrational, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard learned counsel for both parties. In a similar writ petition in W.P. No.22514 of 2004, dated 07-12-2004, this Court directed the petitioner there in, who is none other than the brother of the present petitioner, to file an application before the authorities concerned and the authorities shall take appropriate decision. Therefore, a similar direction can be given in this writ petition also. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to file an application before the respondents within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, and the respondents shall take appropriate decision in accordance with law. ___________ K.C.BHANU, J 7th December, 2004. Note: Furnish C.C. in two days. (B/O) sh To 1. The Principal Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Backward Class Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad. 3. The Convenor, EAMCET-2002 (Admissions) and Commissioner of Technical Education, Sanketika Vidya Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 4. The Controller of Examinations, University Campus, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad. 5. The Principal, G. Narayanamma Institute of Engineering and Technology, Shaikhpet, Hyderabad. 6. 2 CCs to the G.P. for Social Welfare, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT). 7. 2 CD copies.