IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Chamber Summons No. 356 of 2006 in Arb Petition No.l of 200l with Chamber Summoons No 357 of 2006 in Arb Petn No. 3 of 200l with Chamber Summons No.358 of 2006 in Arbitration Petn No. 5 of 200l with Chamber summons No. 359 of 2006 in Arb Petn No. 2 of 200l with Chamber Summons No.360 of 2006 in Arb Petition No. 4 of 200l Ashok Leyland Fin Ltd... . plaintiffs vs Ashwin Grane & Const and ors.. defendants Ms Shakuntala Joshi for plaintiffs Mr S K Jain for defendants CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. DATED l8.4.2006 DATED l8.4.2006 DATED l8.4.2006 P.C. P.C. P.C. l. Heard Ms Joshi appearing for the plaintiffs and Mr Jain for the defendants. Mr Jain seeks time to file affidavit. At the request of Mr. Jain two weeks time is granted to file the affidavit. Mr. Jain states that the office premises mentioned in prayer clause (a) of the chamber summons are already encumbered inasmuch as charge is created in favour of a cooperative bank long back and the defendants will place on record the necessary facts on behalf of the defendants, Mr. Jain states that the residential premises described in this very prayer do not belong to the defendants. Mr. Jain also seeks time to place the details pertaining to these premises as well on affidavit. In the light of the statement of Mr. Jain, no ad-interim relief at this stage. After the affidavit is filed and copy thereof is served on the plaintiffs, liberty to renew the application for ad-interim reliefs.