1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20/07/2011 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.(MD) No.8022 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2011 M.Premavathy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Secretary to Government, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Secretary to Government, Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9. 3.The Director of School Education, (Higher Secondary), College Road, Chennai -6. 4.The Chief Educational Officer, Madurai, Madurai District. 5.The District Educational Officer, Madurai, Madurai District. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to extend the benefits of G.O.Ms.No.216 Finance (PC) Department dated 22.03.1993 and G.O.Ms.No.270, Finance (PC) Department dated 26.08.2010 in the light of the orders passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.8747 of 2009, dated 14.07.2009 as confirmed by the Supreme Court in C.C.No.2746 of 2010, dated 23.04.2010 to the petitioner. For petitioner .. M/s.P.Jessi Jeeva Priya For respondents .. Mr.S.Chandra Sekar, Government Advocate ORDER Though the petitioner has sought for a mandamus directing the respondents to extend the benefits of G.O.Ms.No.216 Finance (PC) Department, dated 22.03.1993, and G.O.Ms.No.270, Finance (PC) Department, dated 26.08.2010, in the light of the orders passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.8747 of 2009, dated 14.07.2009, as confirmed by the Supreme Court in C.C.No.2746 of 2010, dated 23.04.2010, to her, Ms.Jessi Jeeva Priya, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it is suffice that liberty is given to the petitioner to make a representation to the competent authorities, with the relevant details for consideration as to whether she is entitled to similar benefits as conferred under the above said G.Os, as ordered in a batch of writ petitions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2.Considering the limited relief, Mr.S.Chandrasekar, learned Government Advocate put on notice and heard. He submitted that orders would be passed, as and when a representation is made and prayed for sufficient time. 3.In view of the above, without expressing any opinion in the entitlement, the petitioner shall make necessary representation to the competent authorities within a period of two weeks by registered post along with the details regarding her claim for entitlement of the benefits conferred under the above said GOs. and on receipt of the same, the respondents 2 & 3 shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. 4.With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The Secretary to Government, Tamil Nadu State, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-9 2.The Secretary to Government, Tamil Nadu State, Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-9 3.The Director of School of Education, (Higher Secondary) College Road, Chenani-6 4.The Chief Educational Officer, Madurai, Madurai District. 5.The District Educational Officer, Madurai, Madurai District. +1 CC to the Special Government Pleader, SR.No.23796 +1 CC to Mr.S.Subbiah, Advocate, Sr.No.23969 gcg W.P.(MD) No.8022 of 2011 and MP(MD)NO.1 of 2011 20.07.2011 TR : 10.08.2011 : 2p/8c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/