etitione Pr Versus Respandénts 1. The Union of India, Ministry of Raiiway, New Delhi. ' 2. Assistant Divisional Engineer, SE. Railmy, Champa (06} 3. Junior Engineer (P—Way) Qr. No.1, SE. Railway, Korba (CG). (Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Censtitution of India.) SB: Hon’ble Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present: None for the petitioner. ‘None for'the respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this s1“ day or July, 2008 ) The matter is called for hearing twice. On both occasions, none appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in the matter. ' ‘ 2) ln view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- ll Swish K- Agm'hom i \\ Judge > . ' l \7 rs _' _. Gowri i 2;