1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Third day of August Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.PALANIVELU CRL OP(MD) No.11037 of 2011 KANNAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.11 Vs STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSEPCTOR OF POLICE ALANGULAM POLICE STATION, CR.NO.298 OF 2011 TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.RAGAVENTHRE Advocate For Respondent : MR. A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as A11 and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 24.06.2011 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 324, 307, 506(ii) IPC and 25(i)(a) of Arms Act and 3(ii)(v) of SC/ST act altered into 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 324, 307, 506(ii), 120(B) IPC and 25(i)(a) Arms Act and 3(ii0(v) of SC/ST Act, in Crime NO.305 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and the petitioner is in custody for more than 61 days and the co- accused has already been released on bail and hence, he prays for enlargement on bail to the petitioner. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the allegation against the petitioner is that he attacked the victim with Aruval and the injured has been discharge from the hospital and since the investigation is going on, he prays for dismissal of this application. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and the co-accused has already been released on bail and the petitioner is in juridical custody for more than 61 days. I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi, and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. sd/- 23/08/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TENKASI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI 3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI 4 THE SUB INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, ALANGULAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 5 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. S.RAGAVENTHRE Advocate SR.No.28754 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11037 of 2011 Date :23/08/2011 TR : 24.08.2011: 2p/7c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/