IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 391 of 2006 (M/B) Smt. Usha Sharma W/o Sri Arun Sharma, R/o 5/653, Chakrata Road, Saharanpur. ….. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal, through Secretary, Transport, Dehradun. 2. State Transport Authority, Uttaranchal, Dehradun. 3. State Transport Authority, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow. 4. Regional Transport Authority, Uttaranchal, Dehradun. ….. Respondents. Mr. B.S. Adhikari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttaranchal. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon. Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon. P.C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. (Oral) Mr. B.S. Adhikari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Standing Counsel for the respondents. They are heard. 2. Petitioner Smt. Usha Sharma has filed this writ petition for the following reliefs: “1. a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents for not granting any new permit for this new overlapping route to the already existing Inter State Route. 2. to pass any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper. 3. award cost throughout.” 3. Admittedly, the authorities have not passed any adverse order against the petitioner so far. The petitioner, apprehending the passing of such an order against him, appears to have filed the present writ petition. In our opinion, the writ petition is not maintainable at this stage. 4. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed. (P.C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C.J.) 10.04.2006 10.04.2006 G