1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1572/2009, 1598/2009 WITH 1599 OF 2009. -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. A.B.Girase, Adv., for the applicants. Mrs. B.R.Khekale, APP for respondent State. ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 11/8/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr. A.B.Girase, Counsel for the applicants, extensively in the three applications. 2. Three different crimes are registered against the accused/applicant, Avval Karkun at the Tehsil office, Tuljapur, for a period from 2nd March, 2007 to 6th July, 2007. It is alleged, during the tenure of accused/applicant, to be the Senior Clerk, it was part of his duty to coordinate disbursement of food grains and other allied products under the Government of 2 India Scheme meant for poor labours, called as Sampurn Gramin Rojgar Yojana ( Complete Village Employment Scheme). It was in this scenario, the labours were, in addition to the wages, were provided with foodgrains and items. Demand letter under the signature of competent authority was issued to the Tehsildar. This was to be processed by the accused/applicant and, it is apparent, in the said demand letter even the dates are changed. Earlier demand letters are manipulated and excessive quantity was shown by adding figure "1" preceding the figure of original demand. It was obviously to facilitate withdrawal of huge quantity of food grains meant for supplying the same to the labours. At this stage, it cannot be said that it was not part of the duty assigned to the accused applicant. 3. His release on pre-arrest bail in another Crime, arising out of RCC No.108/2008, by order dt.2nd Sept.,2008, will not be amounting 3 to follow the same yardstick to entertain his pre-arrest bail in different crimes registered. There is, prima facie, involvement of the accused. Custodial interrogation will unearth the attrocious arrogating the power. 4. The attendance of the accused/applicant for at least ten months coined by Mr. A.B.Girase, based on the directions of this Court, referred above, by itself, will not be a ground to entertain the same request. 5. Since the applicant herein claims to have attended Police Station for a continuous period of at least six months, may be in other crime and also on occasions in the present case, the interim protection in favour of the accused/applicant is extended till 20th August, 2009. Consequently, applications rejected. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/1572-09craplgr