IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 4666 of 2009 Between: M. Hari Prasad S/o. Ramudu Shop No.1, Rdurampeta (V), (FP Shop No.25) of Ananthapur Rural Mandal, Ananthapur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ananthapur. 2 The Tahsildar (FAC), Ananthapur. 3 The Civil Supplies Deputy Tahsildar (Enforcement), Ananthapur. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs, order or direction declaring the order dt. 22.2.2009 in Rc.No.CS/1250/2009 on the file of the 2nd respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, without jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice; Award costs. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.N.RANGA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM Writ Petition No.4666 of 2009 ORDER: Though the writ petition is filed assailing the order of suspension of his authorization, pending enquiry, dated 22.02.2009, passed by the second respondent, the petitioner does not wish to pursue the writ petition. The petitioner has filed an appeal against the impugned order to the first respondent under the provisions of the APSPDS (Control) Order, 2008. In any event, the petitioner cannot be permitted to simultaneously pursue the appellate remedy as well as judicial review. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. No costs. _____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dt.12.03.2009 VGB