HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY C.R.P. No.2020 OF 2010 DATE:09-07-2010 BETWEEN: Chittineni Usha Kantha & Another …Petitioners AND Arumilli Sitharatnam. …Respondent THIS COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY C.R.P. No.2020 OF 2010 ORDER: When the suit is based upon the oral agreement of sale, the conversation between the second defendant and the plaintiffs as recorded in Ex.A.6 is relevant for the purpose of deciding the suit. Therefore, no infirmity is discernable with the order passed by the Principal District Judge, East Godavari at Rajahmundry in allowing I.A.No.4750 of 2009 in O.S.No.1 of 2007, whereby the learned District Judge allowed the petition for sending Ex.A.6 cassette marked in the suit to the A.P.Forensic Science Laboratory, Hyderabad for voice recognition and also directed the second respondent-second defendant to attend the said institution to give audition in that context. The revision fails and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. _______________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J. JULY 09, 2010 Tsr.