THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5690 of 2010 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The petitioner who is the plaintiff files this Revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking to assail the correctness of the order, dated 16.11.2010, passed in I.A.No.964 of 2010 in O.S.No.241 of 2009 on the file of the XI Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, dismissing an application filed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, whereby the petitioner sought for sending the suit promissory note, a receipt and other documents for comparison by a Handwriting Expert. In the impugned order, the Court below, on consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on either side, gave a categorical finding that the documents which are sought to be compared are not legible and it is very difficult to compare them even to an Expert. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and on perusal of the relevant material on record, it is to be seen that in view of impossibility to make any comparison, any exercise under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act is equally arduous. Hence, I do not find any merit in this Revision warranting interference by this Court in the impugned order. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________________ JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO 10th December 2010 DR