IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.26178 of 2010 DHAKO BIND @ ADHIK LAL BIND Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.8.2010. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Sultanganj P.S.Case No.196 of 2008 for offence punishable under sections 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that merely on grounds that the husband of the informant was lastly seen accompanying the petitioner, he has been roped in the present case. He further submits that the first information report itself has been instituted after a lapse of eight days and that in similar circumstances, one co-accused namely, Girija Yadav has been granted bail by this Court by order dated 19.4.2010 passed in Cr.Misc.No.11838 of 2010. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, let petitioner Dhako Bind alias Adhik Lal Bind be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of 2 Rs.10,000/ (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Sultanganj P.S.Case No.196 of 2008 arising out of Bhagalpur Rail P.S.Case No.17 of 2008, subject to the following conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be 3 cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. ahk (Jyoti Saran, J.)