1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO. 380 /2007 (pursis st. 6890/2011) (Smt.Kanchandevi w/o Kevalchand Kothari and others vs.Gopal Premji Udawat) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Mr. Anand Deshpande,Adv.h/for Mr F T Mirza, Adv.for appellants Mr Bhalerao, Adv.for respondent CORAM : A.B.CHAUDHARI,J. DATED : 17th September,2011. Heard. There is a compromise pursis filed by the appellants and the respondent, which is sworn by both the appellant no. 2 and the respondent. Learned counsel for the appellants and respondent have also signed the said Pursis (St) No. 6890/2011. Learned counsel for both sides submit that the parties to the Appeal have compromised the dispute in terms and conditions mentioned therein. I have gone through the terms and conditions of the compromise pursis. In view of the motion moved by the respective counsel, compromise pursis is accepted. Second Appeal No. 280/2007 is disposed of in terms of compromise pursis. 2 Decree be drawn up in accordance with the compromise pursis. No costs. JUDGE sahare