CWP No.2561/2008. 28.11.2008 Present: Mr Vinod Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr R.K.Bawa, Advocate General with Mr.J.K.Verma, Dy.A.G. for respondents No.1 to 3. This writ petition is directed against the orders of Deputy Commissioner and Divisional Commissioner respectively, who have decided that the petitioner’s family income is more than Rs.12,000. The husband of the petitioner took loan of Rs.1,90,000 and furnished his income certificate of Rs.11,000. The instalments fixed were of Rs.2407 per month. It is admitted case of the petitioner’s counsel that the husband was paying instalments and he had paid such instalments till December 2006 but thereafter he had not paid the instalments. The learned counsel for the petitioner could not show any ground to enable us to show interference in the view expressed by the two Courts below regarding family income. We find that the view expressed by the two Courts below is justified. Accordingly, no interference is warranted under extraordinary writ jurisdiction by this Court. The writ petition is dismissed, so also the pending application. ( Jagdish Bhalla ), C.J. November 28, 2008. ( Kuldip Singh ), J. (soni)