CRM-M No.23371 of 2011 Mohni vs. State of Haryana Present : Mr. S.R.Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Virender Soni, Advocate for the complainant. **** Augustine George Masih, J.(Oral) Present is the application for grant of regular bail in FIR No.170 dated 18.04.2011 for the offence under Sections 148, 149, 332, 353, 302, 120-B IPC & 25, 54 & 59 of Arms Act registered at Police Station Sampla, Distt. Rohtak. The petitioner is a lady with three minor children out of whom one is two year old child and is breast fed by her. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the role attributed to the petitioner is that she had raised a lalkara and instigated the men folk to kill Satbir husband of the complainant. He further contends that apart from this, there is no role attributed to her in the FIR. On the other hand, counsel for the State as well as counsel for the complainant submit that she was the person who was keeping a watch on the proceeding at the hawan and on seeing the appropriate time called the men folk and others to attack the family of the complainant. On this basis, they contended that the concession of regular bail should not be granted to her. However, the factual position with regard to three minor children out of whom one is two year old child and who is breast fed by the petitioner, could not be disputed by the counsel for the State as per the CRM-M No.23371 of 2011 -2- instructions from SI Ram Bhaj, P.S. Sampla, Distt. Rohtak. Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner is stated to be in custody since 22.04.2011, trial is not likely to be concluded in the near future, she being a lady with three minor children out of which one is two years old child, which is being breast fed by her, the interest of justice would require that she may be released on regular bail as her further custody is not necessary firstly because of role attributed to her being that she has been keeping a watch and thereafter instigating the men folk to attack the family of the complainant, secondly, the trial is not likely to conclude soon. The prayer made in the application is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be released on regular bail to the satisfaction of the trial court. The present petition stands disposed of. September 14, 2011 (Augustine George Masih) sonia Judge