IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16183 of 2009 1. NILESH CHAUDHARY 2. Nityanand Chaudhary Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 15.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In the case, petitioners have been alleged for taking thumb impression of the informant in the Court in presence of a lawyer, while he was assured to be executed a bond by the petitioners and giving threatening also. Allegation in itself in my view doubts constituting any offence as to how it was possible at the same time giving of assurance to execute bond and threatening also. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, there is compromise in between the parties. So, I find no case in which the petitioners arrest can be justified at the moment. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with G.R. No. 1816 of 2008 arising out of Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 110 of 2008, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Begusarai subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)