IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH JUNE 2011 / 8TH ASHADHA 1933 WP(C).No. 16926 of 2011(M) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ SURESH, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.VIJAYAN, PONATH HOUSE, PERINJANAM, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN SMT.P.R.REENA RESPONDENT(S): -------------------------- 1. PERINJANAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH PERINJANAM P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN -680 686, REP BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. M/S. TOWER VISION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, IST FLOOR, MUSCAT TOWERS, SA ROAD, KADAVANTHRA, KOCHI PIN 682 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, LEGAL, KERALA CIRCLE. 3. PRADEEP K.N, S/O.NARAYANAN, KANNAPPASSERI HOUSE NJARAKKAL P.O, ERNAKULAM. PIN -682 505. BY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/06/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C)NO.16926/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 PHOTOGRAPH OF THE CONSTRUCTION IN THE PROPERTY OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. P2 COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT DATED 22/01/2011 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P3 COPY OF THE MASS PETITION DATED 8/2/2011 FILED BY THE MEMBERS OF LOCALITY. P4 COPY OF THE RESOLUTION DATED 08/2/2011 OF THE PANCHAYATH. P5 COPY OF THE STOP MEMO DATED 11/3/2011 ISSUED BY THE PANCHAYATH. P6 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30/3/2011 OF TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT. P7 COPY OF THE MASS PETITION FILED BY THE RESIDENTS DATED 14/12/2010. P8 COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DATED 10/08/2009 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA. P9 COPY OF THE INTERNATIONALLY ESTABLISHED PROTECTION CODE REGARDING THE SAFETY OF INSTALLING MOBILE TELEPHONE TOWER IS MENTIONED IN “CELLULAR ALERT” CANADA. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO.JUDGE sts C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. ---------------------------- W.P.(C)No.16926 of 2011 ---------------------------- Dated 29th June, 2011 JUDGMENT When this matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this writ petition to pursue the statutory remedy available to redress the grievance. Permission sought for is granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS