IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.4194 of 2011 HRIDAYANAND PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 02/- 02-02-2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This is an application seeking restoration of Cr. Misc. No. 15052 of 2009 dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 29.10.2010. The aforesaid application was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of order dated 13.02.2009 passed by Sri Ramesh Tiwari, learned Sessions Judge, Aurangabad dismissing Cr. Revision No. 102 of 2007 preferred against order dated 19.10.2006 passed by Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Complaint Case No. 720 of 2005 taking cognizance for the offences under Sections 323, 341/34 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 3/4 of the S.C. & S.T. (P.O.A.) Act. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to agitate all his points including a decision of Apex Court in a case of “Jorgia Pentiah v. State of A.P. reported in 2009 (1) BCCR 153 (SC)” before the trial court at appropriate stage preferably at the time of hearing on the point of charge. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)