IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATHSGARH AT BILftSPUR Misc.Appeal (C) No. IA 31 OF 2011 APPELLANTS CLAIMANTS e'kf^i 1. Ajay Kumar Sirigh, S/0. Rama Shanker, Singh, Aged qbout SOYears. (Father) <>^"' \^: QS ...-•" ^^yr^ ""€^^ ->'v~ .-^ 2. Smt. Sundari Singh, W/o. Shri Ajay Kumar Singh, Aged About- 48 Years. (Mother) Both Resident of Infront of Punjabi Gurudwara, Dayalband, Tehsil & District- Bilaspur (C.G.) VE RSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. Chotelal, S/0. Asha Ram (Driver of the NON-CLAIMANTS Offending Vehicle No. CG- 12 ZC-1375), R/0. Village- Bhadora, Police Station- Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) n 2. Shri Hemant Singh Thakur, S/o. .<I"!~ Vishwanath Singh Thakur (Owner of the Offending Vehicle No. CG- 12 ZC- 1375), R/o. Tilak Nagar, District- Bilaspur(C.G.). ^(^ 3. The New India Insurance Company Limited, Divisional Office, Second Floor, Shri Ram Trade Centre, Infront of Rajiv Plaza, Near Bus Stand, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (Insurance Company ofthe Offending Vehicle No. CG- 12 ZC-1375) APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173^FJt10TOR VEHICLE ACT. ^.ss^S^. .^'y^st- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Division Bench CORAWI: HON'BLE SHRI N.K. AGARWAL& HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR.AJ Wlisc. Appeal No. (clNo. 1097 of2011 ^ APPELLANTS Claimants Ajay Kumar Singh, s/o. Rama Shankar Singh, aged about 50 years, (Father). Smt. Sundari Singh, w/o. Shri Ajay Kumar Singh, aged about 48 years (Mother). Both residents of in front of Punjabi Gurudwara, Dayalband, Tehsit & District Bilaspur (CG. RESPONDENTS Non-Applicants Versus 1. Chotelal.s/o. Asha Ram (Driverof the offending vehicle No. CG-12 ZC 1375) r/o. village Bhadora, Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur (CG). 2. Shri Hemant Singh Thakur, s/o. Vishwanath Singh Thakur (Owner of the offending vehicle No. CG 12 ZC 1375) r/o. Tilak Nagar, District Bilaspyr (CG). 3. The New India Insurance Company Limited, Divisional Office, Second Floor, Shri Ram Trade Centre, in front of Rajiv Plaza, near bus stand, District Bilaspur (CG) (insurance company of the offending vehide No. CG 12 ZC 1375), (Appeal under Section 173 ofthe MotorVehicles Act, 1988) ^ Present: Mr. Sari'raj Khan, counsel for the appellants. «?' ft! 'tk g %'tss^i. 1 't ^ ^^ "%-^s^ Raju ORDER (8-11-2011) Per N.K. Aaarwal.J Learned counsel appearing for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to raise objection in the appeal preferred by the respondent No.3 - The New India Insurance Company Limited. Permission is granted as prayecLfor. With the aforesaid liberty, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge Sd/- R.N. Chandrakar Judge