THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO W.A.No.1472 of 2008 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard both sides and at their request, the main appeal itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage. The appellants herein are the third parties to W.P.No.10395 of 2008. The first respondent filed W.P.No.10395 of 2008 to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to release and restore the land by considering its representation. The learned Single Judge of this Court, having regard to the facts and circumstances, directed the respondents to consider the representations of the writ petitioner. The only grievance of the appellants herein is that the impugned order is creating some practical problems and a vacate stay petition is also filed in the writ petition. Having heard the learned counsel and also by taking into consideration the checked provisions it is found desirable that rather than comprehensive consideration of all the aspects in the other connected matter by any such orders, though may not have any positive effect on the rights of the parties, leaving the parties to their respective submissions in the vacate stay petition in W.P.No.16092 of 2008. This appeal is accordingly allowed and the direction given by the learned Single Judge to the effect that the representation filed by respondent No.1/writ petitioner dated 8.10.2007 and 9.10.2007 before passing any final orders, should be considered is set aside. We also make it clear that it is open for the learned Single Judge to pass orders and this order would not come in any way for considering afresh on merits. Subject to the above, the Writ Appeal is disposed of. _______________ B.PRAKASH RAO,J ______________ R.KANTHA RAO,J 10th November, 2008. PNV THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO W.A.No.1472 of 2008 10th November, 2008