IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11429 of 2011 Deepak Agrawal Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.11551 of 2011 Ishwar Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.11631 of 2011 Baldeo Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.11648 of 2011 Biwi Nusrat Bano Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.11649 of 2011 Umesh Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.11653 of 2011 Md.Ejaz Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.11657 of 2011 Rohan Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.11658 of 2011 Rajesh Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.11778 of 2011 Md.Zahir Mian Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with CWJC No.11793 of 2011 Damodar Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors with 2 CWJC No.12764 of 2011 Manoj Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 3/ 21.10.2011 Perused the record. All the eleven writ applications are taken up together for disposal, as issues involved is common in nature. All the petitioners have constructed a hotel in Bodh Gaya. The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Bodh Gaya in its notice dated 26.05.2011 stated that construction has been made in violation of bye-laws and in absence of sanctioned map. It appears from the notice issued by the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Bodh Gaya in these cases that either the construction has been made without sanction of map or in violation of the bye-laws. In their petitions, the petitioners have stated that the impugned order has been passed without providing an opportunity of hearing and without specifically stating the nature of violation committed by them. Mr. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel appearing for Nagar Panchayat, Bodh Gaya submits that in fact the construction has been made in violation of master plan. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I observe as follows: The respondents would issue supplementary notice stating the violation in each of the cases separately within four 3 weeks. The petitioners would file their detailed representations within a further period of four weeks. The respondent concerned would dispose of the representations of the petitioners expeditiously within a further period of four weeks. Pending adjudication of the matter, neither the demolition of the premises would take place nor the petitioners would make any construction of any nature. All these writ applications are disposed of. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)