IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.51595 of 2008 MONA KUMAR @ MONU KUMAR, SON OF LATE SHIV PD. RESIDENT OF MOHALLA NAND NAGAR COLONY, P.S.- BAHADURPUR COLONY, DISTT.- PATNA ….. PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ….. OPP. PARTY WITH Cr.Misc. No.1829 of 2009 SARWAN THATHERA @ ARUN @ SHAREVAN THATHERA, SON OF SURENDRA THATHERA, RESIDENT OF NAND NAGAR COLONY, P/S BAHADURPUR, DISTT.- PATNA ….. PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ….. OPP. PARTY ----------- 04 10.8.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The offence alleged is under Section 302/34 of the Indian Panel Code. It is submitted that the petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. However, during the course of investigation, they have been apprehended on mere suspicion and they are in jail custody for more than one and half years. The learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State, on perusal of the case diary, opposes the prayer for bail and submits that during investigation the witnesses claims to have seen the petitioners assaulting the son of the informant and took him towards the Baulia pond, somewhere near 2 the place of occurrence and in the next morning dead body of the son of the informant was found floating, and as such the petitioners are not inclined to grant bail. Considering the submissions and the nature of allegations as also the materials which has been placed by the learned A.P.P., I am not inclined to allow these applications, and as such these applications are accordingly rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after submission of the charge-sheet the case has been committed to the court of Sessions and as such the trial be expedited. P.K. (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)