IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 1st Bail Application No.965 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Gopal Singh .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party __________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.1125/2010, U/s 380/411/457 IPC, PS Kotwali Champawat __________________________________________________________ Dated: November 9, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER, J. Heard Mrs. Pushpa Joshi, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. BS Parihar, Brief Holder for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is not named in the FIR. Even the recovery shown from the possession of the applicant is the domestic articles which have not been identified as per law and even no identification of the accused has been taken place in the jail till now. The applicant has got no previous criminal history and is in jail since 1.10.2010. After considering all the facts and circumstances and without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Champawat. The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) November 9, 2010 Rdang