IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH JANUARY 2011 / 29TH POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 1790 of 2011(W) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- RABEEBA RINU .P (MINOR), AGED 14 YEARS, D/O.LATE UNNI MUHAMMED PARANCHEERI HOUSE, VELLUVAMBRAM P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY HER GUARDIAN & MOTHER MRS.ARIFA .M. BY ADVS. SRI.ZAKEER HUSSAIN, SMT. K.A. SANJEETHA. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, TRIVANDRUM, PIN- 695 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, TRIVANDRUM, PIN – 695 001. 3. GENERAL CONVENER,MALAPPURAM REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM,MALAPPURAM, PIN – 676 505. 4. THE APPELLATE COMMITTE, MALAPPURAM REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM, PIN – 676 505. 5. GENERAL CONVENER, KERALA STATE SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, C/O.DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOTTAYAM, PIN – 686 001. R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. P. NARAYANAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19/01/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: prv. ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) NO.1790 OF 2011(W) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T In the Malappuram District Kalolsavam petitioners' team participated in Oppana. They were given second prize with A grade. Complaining that the technical faults resulted in their inferior performance they filed an appeal which was rejected by Ext.P4. It is challenging Ext.P4 that the writ petition is filed. A reading of Ext.P4 shows that on examination of the appeal the appeal committee found that there was no irregularity in the assessment of performance by the judges. Nothing has been placed on record to invalidate this finding. Therefore writ petition fails and is dismissed. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/