IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7253 of 2011 GADIL MANJHI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 02.05.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the shifting of the location of the poling booth to a distance at about 2 K.M. with regard to a part of the voters. The location of a polling booth is primarily an executive function for which the authorities are best suited, to be exercised in accordance with the statutory provisions in Rules 26 and 27 of the Bihar Panchayat Election Rules, 2006. The booth is statutorily required to be located at a site approved by the State Election Commission. The State Election Commission on reasonable grounds has the statutory powers to give order for alteration in the list of polling station even after its final publication but the District Officer cannot make any alteration in the list approved or in anticipation of approval. There is no assertion in the writ petition of any statutory violation. If the petitioner has represented before 2 the Election Commission it if for him to decide if he wishes to pursue the representation. The Court is not satisfied that any statutory grounds for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been made out. The writ application stands dismissed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)