IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.7909 of 2007 Shanteshwar Mishra, son of late Pandit Janardan Mishra, Resident of Village- Barwan, P.O. Harpur Tola, P.S. Majhwalia, Distt- West Champaran. ..... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar, through Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Additional Collector, West Champaran, Bettiah. 3. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Bettiah, West Champaran. 4. Circle Officer, Block- Majwalia, West Champaran. 5. Rajnandan Shani, S/o Sharda Pd. Shahi, resident of Village- Mahachhi Main, P.S. Gopalpur, Distt- West Champaran. 6. Laxman Shah, S/o late Jokhu Shah, R/o Majhwalia, Vllage-Barwan, P.O. Harpur, P.S. Majhwalia, Distt.- West Champaran. 7. Bachchu Shah, S/o late Thag Shah, R/O Village- Barwan, P.O. Harpur Tola, P.S. Majhawalia, Distt- West Champaran. 8. Sharma Tiwari, S/o late Shivjee Tiwari, R/o Village- Birwan, P.O. Harpur Tola, P.S. Majwalia, Distt.- West Champaran. 9. Amardesh Tiwari, Son of late Shivjee Tiwari, R/o Village- Birwan, P.O. Harpur Tola, P.S. Majhawalia, Distt.- West Champaran. 10. Ramautar Ram, S/o late Sheo Ram, R/o Village- Shimra Ghat, P.O. Sarisawan Bazar, P.S. Majwalia, Distt.- West Champaran. 11. Ram Kishun Ram, Son of late Sheo Ram, R/o Village- Shemra Ghat, P.O. Sariswan Bazar, P.S. Majwalia, Distt.- West Champaran. 12. Smt. Kalpati Devi, D/o late Doma Ram, W/o Prayag Ram, R/o village- Chaila Bhar, P.O. Mahanaganni, P.S. Majwalia, Distt.- West Champaran. 13. Smt. Rampati Devi, D/o late Doma Ram, W/o Parshan Ram, R/o Village- Chintamanpur, P.O. D.K. Shikarpur, Distt.- West Champaran. .... Respondents. ----------- 2 2 02- 9.2.2009 Heard Mr. Pankjesh Sharma for the petitioner, and Mr. Shashidhar Jha, learned assistant counsel to Government Advocate No.1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 27.01.1999 (Annexure-2), passed by the learned Additional Collector, West Champaran, Bettiah, in Mutation Revision Case No. 510 of 1996 (Santeshwar Mishra Vs. Raj Nandan Shahi), whereby the revision application preferred by the present petitioner has been rejected, and Jamabandi has been directed to be created in favour of respondent nos.6, 10 and 11. It further appears that the parties are already locked in a title suit where the impugned order can be challenged. The writ petition is dismissed. (S K Katriar, J.) S.K.Pathak/