IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWPs No. 10206, 10207 and 10208 of 2011-A. Decided on: 2nd December, 2011. 1. CWP No. 10206of 2011-A. Sarwan Kumar. vs. State of H.P. & anr. 2. CWP No. 10207 of 2011-A. Kuldeep Chand. Vs. State of H.P. & anr. 3. CWP No. 10208 of 2011-A. Vipin Kumar. vs. State of H.P. & anr. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Vashishta, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Bawa, Advocate General, with Mr. J.K. Verma, DAG. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “A. Writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to grant the benefit of pay fixation and counting of the tenure service for the purpose of pension w.e.f. 28.8.1987 to 31.3.1994 (15.10.1988 to 31.3.1994 in CWP No. 10207/2011 and January, 1990 to 31.3.1994 in CWP No. 10208 of 2011), the due date in favour of the petitioners as has been allowed to similarly placed persons in the Department of Education, Government of Himachal Pradesh along with consequential benefits.” 2. The petitioners claim the benefit of pay fixation and also counting the said period for the purpose of pension during the tenure period. According to the petitioners, the 2 issue is covered in their favour by the judgments of this Court dated 16.12.2010 rendered in CWP No. 4550 of 2010 titled as Ravi Kumar vs. State of H.P. & others and in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgments referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copies of the judgments, referred to above by the petitioner concerned. 3. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice 2nd December, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tr/kck) Judge. 3