IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO : 2158 of 2009 (Criminal Revision case under Section:_______ against the Judgement in NO : dated ______ on the file of the Court of the to set aside the order dated 23-10-2009 made in Crl.M.P. No. 3544 of 2009 in Crime No. 24 of 2009 (P.S., CCS., Hyderabad), on the file of the XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.,preferred against the order in CR 24 2009 dated 23/10/2009 on the file of the Court of the ) Between: S.I.S. Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, K. Pratap Reddy Floors 2, 3 & 4, Laxmi Cyber Centre, 8-2-682, Road No. 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Vemuri Anasuya W/o. V.V.S. Prasad R/o. H.No. 2-2-1133/B, New Nallakunta, Hyderabad - 44. 2 The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.C.V.R.RUDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following : PSR, J. Crl.R.C.No. 2158 of 2010 Judgment Heard both sides. On 22—12—2009, this court passed the following order in Crl.M.P.No. 3041 of 2009. “This revision case has been filed against the order dated:23.10.2009 in Crl.M.P.No. 3544 of 2009 in Crime No.24 of 2009 on the file of the XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, whereby and where under the learned Magistrate ordered that the property shall be returned to the petitioner only after completion of FSL test or recording in CD in the presence of the counsel and APP, if the FSL test beyond two months. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FSL test is not yet completed and it may take some more time to complete the said test. It is further submitted that in the meanwhile if the CPUs are returned, the petitioner would be put to irreparable loss. In the circumstances, the order dated:23.10.2009 in Crl.M.P.No. 3544 of 2009 passed by the lower court is suspended for a period of one year. However, the FSL test may go on and be completed as soon as possible. “ 2. The learned counsel appearing for the first respondent contends that she has been put to inconvenience on account of non- availability of the Computers and she is subjected to financial constraints. 3. The FSL cannot take substantial time for examining the material and submit the report. In the circumstances when the first respondent is suffering financial constraints and as there is no necessity for keeping the Computers for such a long time, as the Computers are already handed over to FSL; it is directed that the Computers shall be returned to the first respondent within one month from today, by which time the FSL authorities must complete the required tests. 4. With the above directions the revision case is disposed of. _______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J. Dated:10—03—2010. *BVS