IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.11279 of 2008. Decided on: 21.12.2010. Tilak Raj. ……….Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal, Pradesh and others. ……….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner. : Mr.Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. P.M.Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral) The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that in view of Mool Raj Upadhyaya versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, his case for conferment of work charge status was required to be considered immediately after completion 10 years since he was engaged before 31.12.1993. 2. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for conferment of work charge status immediately after completion of 10 years as per law laid down in Mool Raj Upadhyaya versus State of H.P and others, 1994 Supplement (2) Supreme Court Cases 316 and State of Himachal Pradesh and others versus Gehar Singh, (2007) 12 SCC 43, within a period of two 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?. No. months after production of copy of this judgment by the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) December 21, 2010. Judge (krt)