IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 6TH APRIL 2010 / 16TH CHAITHRA 1932 WP(C).No. 11794 of 2010(Y) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ NIKHIL LAKSHMAN, AGED 22, S/O.V.L. RAJENDRAN, 'NANDANAM, KOOTINGAL TEMPLE ROAD, NETTOOR, MARADU, ERNAKULAM-682 040. BY ADV. MR.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT, MR.ABILASH K.N., SMT.LEELA R. RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR, THRIKKAKARA, KOCHI-22, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, THRIKKAKARA, KOCHI-22, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY ADV. MR.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,COCHIN UTY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/04/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rs. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.11794 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of April, 2010. J U D G M E N T The petitioner is a B.Tech Electronics and Communication course student of the Cochin University of Science and Technology. He completed the said course in 2009. The petitioner appeared for the supplementary examinations in EC 402 Electronics Circuits in April 2009 and EC 502 Signals & Systems in July 2009. When the results of the same were published, the petitioner failed in the above two papers. The petitioner applied for revaluation of the papers EC 402 Electronics Circuits on 01.01.2010 and EC 502 Signals & Systems on 27.01.2010. 2. The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to publish the revaluation result of the petitioner within a time frame. It is submitted that the petitioner has obtained a job already and unless the revaluation is completed earlier, that may cause difficulty and hardship to the petitioner. W.P.(C) No.11794/2010 2 3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the University. It is submitted that sufficient time will be required to complete the process of revaluation. In the light of the urgency shown by the petitioner, there will be a direction to the University to complete the revaluation and communicate the results thereof to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks. This writ petition is disposed of as above. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE smp `