W/ IN THE M.P. STATE ADMINISTRATI TRIB NAL AT RAIPUR ORIGINAL APPLICATION N . (g OF 1998 W§,2qge [OY‘ /,__, APPLICANTS : KHOOB CHAND MAJHI AGED ABOUT 28, YEARS S/O SHRI BALDEO SINGH MAGHI VILLAGE - MUCHBAHAL, V BLOCK - MAINPUR ,TAH.- DEOBHOG DISTT.- RAIPUR 1MP.) 2. PHOLDHAR SINGH PAVDE S/O SHRI RAM LAL PAVDE AGEGD ABOUT 38 YEARS ‘FI/O VILEGE - BHEJIPADAR POST — KANDEKELA __—_—————— BLOCK — MAINPUR, TAH.— DEOBHOG DISTT. - RAIPUR (MR! 3. PUSTAM SINGH DHRU AGED ABOUT 29, YEARS, D/O SHRI JANGLU RAM DHRU R/O VILLEGE - POST— AMLIPADAR BLOCK - MAINPUR,TAH. - DEOBHOG W 4. JAGNNATH SONVANI AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, S/O SHRI BAJRAJ SONVANI R/O VILLEGE- BHEJIPADAR POST—KANDEKELA BLOCK - MAINPUR, TAH. - DEOBHOG DISTT.- RAIPUR (MR) 5. DULLURAM YADU AGFn ABOUT 29YEARS r gm SHRI NURPORAM _ R/o VALLEG & POST - DHARANIDHODHA BLOCK - MAINPUB TAH. - DEOBHOG DISTr. — BAIPUR (MR) 6. KU. SAN‘DHYA THAKUR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS DzO SHRI MANSINGH THAKUR t RzO VILLEG & POST - AMLIPADAR BLOCK - MAINPUR, TAH.- DEOBHOG BISTT. BAIPUR 7. KU. LAXMINI THAKUR AGED ABOUT 37YEARS .W B/O VILLEG & POST - AMLIPADAR BEOCK - MAINPUR TAH.- DEOBHOG mSTT. BAIPUR ' SMT. KALYANI MISHRA AGED ABOUT 29YEARS wzo SHBI MAHESH KUMAB MISHRA VILLEHE POST - AMLIPADAR BLOCK — MAINPUR, TAH. - DEOBHOG mSTI. _ RATPUVB GIRDHAnl’LAL KASHYAP AGED ABOUT 34, YEARS, S/O SHRI CHARAN SINGH KASHYAP R/O-VILLAGE— KOSAEKANI BLOCK - DEOBHOG DISTT.- BAIPUB (MP) L HIGH (HURT OF CHI—I ATTISGARH AT BILASPUR S.B. : HON’BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. WRIT PETITION (SJ N0.2486 OF 2005 'Khoob Chand Majhi and others Petitioner Versus State of MP. and others Respondents Present : Mr. Alok Nigam, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Ajay Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. ORDER (Passed on 7‘“ of September, 2006) It is submitted that the facts and question of law \ involved in the present petition are same to that of in Ram Sahay Jha vs. State ofMadhya Pradesh and others (Original Application 3 No.15/1995). The Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur, by its judgment. and order dated 16-2-1996, allowed the application of the petitioner therein. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to approach the respondents/State for consideration and disposal of the petitioners’ case in terms bf the order dated 16-2-1996 passed in the case of Ram Sahay Jha (Supra) by Madhya Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur. 2. Learned counsel appearingfor the respondents/State fairly agrees with the submissions made by learned eounsel for the petitioners. 3. Accordingly, the petitioners are granted liberty to make a representation before the respondents ~ State Authorities for heir decision on the representation in the light of the order dated 16-2-1996 passed in the case of Ram Sahay Jha (Supra), in accordance with law, on its own merit, within reasonable time. 4. With the above-stated liberty, this petition stands . r/ar‘ disposed of. No order as to costs. i»— l l l _ii~_‘ ‘ i Certified copy as per rules. Sd/_ i Satish K. Agnihotri i Judge i ‘1 " " ’ l i t