IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.13608 of 2009 RAM DAYAL MAHTO, son of late Nathuni Mahto, resident of village Mathiya, Tole Mamalbari, P.S.Basopatti, District-Madhubani------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.13891 of 2009 RAM AUTAR MAHTO @ MIRCHI, son of late Ramayan Mahto, resident of village-Baluatol, P.S.-Kaluahi, District-Madhubani----------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------Petitioner. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 24.4.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is land dispute in between the parties. Petitioner and others have been allowed to enter into the house of the informant. Thereafter, they caused firing and exploded bombs, splinters of which hit the informant. But nothing was found from the place of occurrence nor petitioners are alleged for firing or exploding bombs and even then they are apprehending their arrest which can never be justified. I agree with the submission of the learned counsel. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in Khajauli(Kaluahi) P.S. case no.326 of 2008, the above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )