IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 130 of 2008 (S/B) Dinesh Chandra. .……… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others. .………. Respondents. Mr. Sharad Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. J.S. Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Anil Kumar Bisht, Advocate for respondent No. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. BARIN GHOSH, C. J. (Oral) The transfer effected on 5th July, 2008 remained stayed until date. However, by the order dated 21st December, 2009, this Court had made it clear that the stay of the transfer order dated 5th July, 2008 will not stand in the way of transferring the petitioner by any subsequent order. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the parties have not been able to inform us whether in terms of the said order of this Court, the petitioner has been subsequently transferred or not. However, keeping in view the fact that the petitioner holds a transferable job, we assume that the petitioner has been transferred, and if not, he would be transferred soon. As a result, we are of the view that there is nothing further to be done in the writ petition. The same is, accordingly, disposed of. This order and any other order passed on the writ petition will not stand in the way of effecting transfer of the petitioner by an order passed after 5th July, 2008 or to be passed hereafter. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C. J.) 13.08.2010 13.08.2010 G