C^frsl^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR [WRIT JURISDICTION] WRITPETITION^33.7L.../2003 / IN THE MATTER OF: - Aswani Kumar Mehar S/o Sri k.R. Mehar Aged about 32 years / R/0 Churcha Colliery Quarter No. 627, Baikunthpur Distt. Korea {Chhattisgarh}. •^•••'^^ (^y ^^'-^"...'* ^9\^ -:""" v-^^y^'"' r<e';A -•-•"' A^*' PETITJQNER ui~t>1 VERSUS 01. THECHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGINGDIRECTOR S.E.C.L. SeepatRoad, Bilaspur [C.G.] RESPONDENTS 02. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., Balkunthpur Area. Baikunthpur, Distt. Korea [C.G.] 03. CHIEF PERSONAL MANAGER Department of Regional Personat Administration Headquarter. Baikunthpur Distt. Korea. {Chhattisgarh} 04. SUPERINTEDENT / MANAGER Churcha west Cotliery Churcha, baikunthpur Distt. Korea. {Chhattisgarh} y' WRIT^ETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF^A WR[T IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION. CERTIORARI ETC OR ANY OfHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER. XI-HC-22 \a2?!.S- ' ^•ti.+ SS^f s^lf ^n 'S^ •<ti<<ict<i, wihww, hwmy. .^••^•••^^^ WWt aiHKS &<><<(" 3II^t^<II8R^lft3 Shri 5.K. AAis i,eounselto' 4./2t.4- Heurd. The learned counsel for thd appointed us apprentice in th< vide order- No. MP/BKP/'PM/' petitiona" Is carrying out his dutiej som^ ^i^pioy^es wno GF-S. ^uniG^s to hi"hsr cadrs ^hersos ths &£tltlQnej Vide No.4 intirnati'ng some sf the appren) conducted cn 23-7-2003 at 11 a.ml the Cutegor'y No.2 namely, Subran the respondsnt No.4 +o take the petitioners and the petitioner was r[ name of the patitioner wcs deietei] "ature of certiorari for quashii 21-7-2003 issued by the respon^ resnondent No.4 to allow the pstitionsr subtn'ts thQt the- pstitionsr Chur'cha West Coiiiery on 16-3-IQ94, , Anne>;ur'@~P/l ^nel fiinee therj the ^ wlth ^tncerlty ^nd fy|| dedlcstion l|i£petitiorssp <u^£bsing prorTsoted to thg i^ ^fil! workin^ in ths estsQor'y No-2, oin I have heard the learned coi The ieamed eounsei for 1he( wlfio iiJysFS iunioFS t-Q 't'Hs ss't'i'tionsp ^ wnereas, Tne peTiTioner was noT ii cttt^Jyt4l;f TREEeff "^ fe^"^R^R ^esSwvwSss the petitioner. noTics fS5S/4 K\/ ^ r^ 'ponysny •ices to aDDeaf tor The trade test •ro be Two apprantices iwho were worklng in ^nd Rum Sunficr Sirigh yvgr'^ infor-iv^cd by [trade test. Tnev are iuniors to the »t to in the test and the deiiberateiy, therefore, a writ in the ig the impugned order/notice dated No.4 be pcssed and direct the ts take the trade test. isel for the oetitioner. petitioner subraitted that the persons ^ere ailowed to appesr i" ths trade test rjformsd to upp^ar In ths t%st which Is XI-HC-22 sn^iw Rili.lt OflSsfl ^va<^ ^t?fl ^^(^ef\ ~3^ 'fnm'i, ®til«'ts,[°iCT«y 3H^?r TRW *<1«<CTI^pqJq;-—————————————"^^ 2(K) RI<I<IIST' ar-bitrarv and illeqal. Counse! fur'ther f aliowed to renresentation beforei H^vtnQ heard the Isarned couj •"egard to the focts and circumstancss to make "epresentution raising uil hi- bsfers the r'espondant No.4 within a p^rioa af ten aays and +he rsgpondem Mo.4 t^l II co-nsider the reDr©s^ntstior monns" and pass appropriate orde| circums+onces of the. ccsse within a w recsipt of the "epresentotion. With thefie obssrvations, the wilit Consequently, M.(W.)P. No. 2144). d!3puS^u OT. PQrties ars entitled fer eerrifietl eopy of thl^ ord^r. *Wi<"itii'f *ll*fcff 4 ft^t <Rnt(n ^yaiPmsii^T lubmitted that the petitione;- may.be |the respondent No.4. [isel for the petitioner and having bf the case, the Betitioner is allowed I qrjevances aoainst the test of the pet'tloner in an objective consiaer'ing all Tne TOCTS cna riod of 30 days from the- dQte of pe+ition is disposed of. |/2003 and l.A. No. 7221/2003 stand ~g5l-~ L.C. Bhadoo ^/s7 W ^ ss ^