IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.9729 of 2011 Vinita Sharma Versus Suraj Kumar & Anr ----------- 02. 27.06.2011 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ application has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 23.2.2011 passed by Additional Munsif – 4th, Muzaffarpur in Eviction Suit No. 28 of 2003 (Suraj Kumar and others Vs. Vinita Sharma) whereby, the learned court below allowed the respondent to withdraw the arrears of rent to the extent of Rs.69,000/- deposited by the tenant-petitioner and also the current and future rent. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned court below found that by order dated 28.11.2005 it was found that there is relationship of landlord and tenant between the plaintiff and defendant-petitioner and the petitioner has deposited the said amount as directed by this Court. In view of the above fact that there is relationship of landlord and tenant and the petitioner has deposited the arrears of rent and the fact that the learned court below has directed the plaintiff to file an affidavit giving undertaking that the will honour the final order of the Court, in my opinion, this is not a fit case for exercising supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed. S.S. ( Mungeshwar Sahoo, J.)