IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.171 OF 2009 Union Bank of India ..... Appellants V/s. Manjula Ashok Vora & Ors. ..... Respondents Mr.Rushab Shah i/by M/s.Sai & Co., for the appellant. CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATE : 18th MARCH, 2009. P.C. 1. The above appeal has been filed by the appellants aggrieved by the continuance of the order of the status-quo granted in respect of the suit property which order is continuing from 10-09-2008. The said order was passed on the draft Notice of Motion moved by the plaintiffs for ad-interim reliefs. The learned counsel for the appellant informs the Court that the Notice of Motion is to come up for hearing on 13- 04-2009. 2. Looking to the order that is to be passed in the above appeal, no notice is required to be issued to the respondents herein. Various contentions have been raised on behalf of the appellant bank as regards the maintainability of the suit and also as regards the order of status-quo passed therein. In my view, instead of interdicting at this stage, it would be 2 appropriate to direct the Notice of Motion to be disposed of within a particular time frame. Hence, the following order. : O R D E R : 1. The Notice of Motion filed by the plaintiffs/respondents in S.C.Suit No.1685 of 2008 which is to come up on 13-04-2009 shall be disposed of by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court within four weeks of 13-04-2009. 2. All the contentions of the respective parties are kept open. 3. The Notice of Motion would be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law. 4. The above Appeal from Order is accordingly disposed of. ( R.M.SAVANT, J. )