SCA/3397/1991 1/3 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3397 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= DALUBHAI BHAYAJIBHAI EXPIRED THRO'WIDOW BAPLIBEN DALUBHAI & 6 - Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 2 - Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR SUNIL S JOSHI for Petitioner(s) : 1, 1.2.1,1.2.2 - 2,2.2.1 - 5,5.2.1 - 6, 6.2.1, 6.2.2,6.2.3 - 7, 7.2.1, 7.2.2, 7.2.3, 7.2.4, 7.3.1, 7.3.2,7.3.3 FRESH NOTICE REQD(N) for Petitioner(s) : 3,NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner(s) : 3.2.1 Ms. Trusha Patel, Asst. GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent(s) : 1 - 2. MR VJ DESAI for Respondent(s) : 3, ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER Date : 11/01/2008 ORAL JUDGMENT In this petition, the petitioners have, inter alia, challenged the notice dated 22.4.1991 SCA/3397/1991 2/3 JUDGMENT (Ann.E) and prayed that the said notice may be quashed and set aside. By virtue of para 18(C), the petitioners have also challenged the orders dated 18.6.87 and 18.4.88, Annexures C and D respectively and prayed that the said orders also may be quashed and set aside. The petition was admitted by order dated 9.5.91 and ad-interim relief in terms of para 18(D) was granted. 2. Today, the matter is listed for final hearing and Mr. Sunit Joshi, advocate appears on behalf of the petitioners and submits that he is appearing on behalf of all petitioners in the subject petition. He also submits that he has received instruction from his clients, i.e., the petitioners of the subject petition, SCA No. 3397/1991 to withdraw the subject petition, SCA No. 3397/1991. He has submitted that vide communications dated 4.7.2007, 15.10.2007, 5.12.2007, 30.12.2007 and 3 other communications all dated 5.7.2007 he has been instructed by all the petitioners to withdraw the said petition. He, therefore, on behalf of the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw the SCA/3397/1991 3/3 JUDGMENT petition. Ms. Trusha Patel, AGP appears for respondents and submits that she has perused the said communications annexed to the petition and she has no objection if the petitioners are permitted to withdraw the petition. In view of the statements made at bar by Shri Sunit Joshi, advocate appearing on behalf of all petitioners and in view of the no objection by Ms. Trusha Patel, AGP for respondents, the petitioners are permitted to withdraw the petition. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. The ad-interim relief/interim relief stands vacated forthwith and the petition stands disposed of as regards all claims, grievances and reliefs prayed for in the petition. Rule discharged. No order as to costs. [ K.M. Thaker, J. ] rmr.