CWP No. 22995 of 2010 Kavita Kumari vs. State of Haryana and others Present: Mr.J.S.Mor, Advocate for the petitioners. *** Learned counsel has argued that by letter Annexure P-9 the petitioners were informed that allegations of impersonation could be enquired only on receiving of complaint. Thereafter specific complaint (Annexure P-13) dated 19.10.2010 was filed but no action has been taken thereon. In the circumstances prays that he would be satisfied if respondent No.2 holds an inquiry into these allegations to satisfy himself that no impersonation has taken place in the State Teacher's Eligibility Test. I find this request to be a fair one. In the circumstances respondent No.2 is directed to conduct the necessary inquiry as per the applications Annexures P-10 and P-14 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, this petition stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) JUDGE December 22, 2010 sunita