WP(C) 5842/2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B K SHARMA Heard Mr P Upadhaya, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr S Baruah, learne d CGC. The petitioners are aggrieved by non-payment of compensation amount to which the y claimed to be entitled in respect of LA Case No 15/2006 and 16/2006. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents, the entitlement of the petiti oner has not been disputed, but what has been contended in paragraph- 6 is that in the event of passing an order by this Court in the light of the order dated 2 8.10.2009 passed in Misc Case No 1930/2009 in WP(C) No 404/2009 and WP(C) No 292 /2009, the amount will be paid. Initially by order dated 4.2.1009 passed in WP(C ) No 404/2009, this Court provided that until returnable date there should be no disbursement of any amount as compensation without the leave of this Court . It appears that subsequently some modified order was passed in Misc Case No 1930/2 009. The issue involved in WP(C) No 404/2009 is as to whether in tribal belt land can be transferred to a non-tribal but the same is not the case here. In view of th e above, this writ petition is disposed of providing that the respondents may ex amine the case of the petitioners as regards entitlement of compensation in resp ect of the aforesaid LA Cases. If upon such examination, it is found that the pe titioners are entitled to receive any compensation amount and that there is no impediment for taking necessary action for disbursement of the compensation amou nt, same shall be paid to them. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of four months from today.