THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23724 of 2007 Date: 04.03.2008 Between: Anam Venkata Ramana Reddy … Petitioner AND The Superintendent of Police, Nellore district. And others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri V.R.Reddy Kovvuri Counsel for respondents : G.P. for Home HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23724 of 2007 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed seeking the following substantive relief: “..Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the 2nd respondent in not completing the investigation in Cr.No.189 of 2005, dated 24.9.2005 registered on his file for the offences under Sections 147, 323, 506 r/w. Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 against the respondent No.3 and some others as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the procedure envisaged under section 173 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and settled principles of legal position apart from being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the 2nd respondent to investigate the Cr.No.189 of 2005 and file the report before the Competent Court for taking cognizance as required under the procedure envisaged under Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 forthwith and pass such other order…” At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the counter affidavit filed by the respondents in W.P.No.23720 of 2007 which was also filed by the petitioner relating to the criminal complaint filed against another person, the respondents stated that investigation was completed and charge sheet was already filed and that the concerned jurisdictional Magistrate took cognizance of the same in C.C.No.1177 and 1178 of 2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that since one of the crimes registered relates to respondent No.3 herein, no further orders in this writ petition need be passed. In view of this submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.30882 of 2007 filed by the petitioner seeking interim relief is also dismissed. ___________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J Date:04.03.2008 mdaa