1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR F.A.NO.283 of 2010 Sau.Jyoti Ulhas Marathe ..vs.. Vijay Suganchand Bothra and ors. ARBITRATION APPEAL ST.NO.5346 of 2008 Smt.Prabhawati wd/o Arun Marathe ..vs.. Smt/Jyoti Ulhas Marathe and ors. =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr.M.M.Agnihotri Adv.for the appellant Mr.A.A.Naik Ad. for respondent no.5. C ORAM : C.L.Pangarkar, J. DATED : 23rd April, 2010. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondents. These two appeals have been preferred against an order passed by the District Judge in Arbitration proceedings. Both parties waive notice. The parties have placed before the court the minutes in respect of the settlement of the dispute between them with regard to the said arbitration proceedings. Although the parties themselves are not present before the court, the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondents submits 2 that they have been authorised to make the statement before the court that the dispute has been settled in terms of these minutes filed before the court. In the circumstances, the statement is accepted on behalf of both the counsel for the appellant as well as the respondents. Both the appeals, therefore, stand disposed of in terms of the minutes as are filed on record. The minutes are marked as 'X' for identification in both the appeals. JUDGE. chute