t:s''"a:'Ssi. //•"^. \ 1 "' x. V ^'.-,J ^• st3 Slr /t-y A^' Petitioner (^o Pstjtion (S)_No^SWof_Z^| Smt. Pushpalata Singh, VV/o. E3adan Singh, aged about 46 years, Assistant Teacher, Government Prlmary Schoo!, Tl!ak Nagar (A), Bilaspur, B!ook Bilha, District Bilaspur (CG). ^esDonaente 1) State of Chhattisgarh.Ahrough Secretary, School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CGV 2) The Director, Public Instruction Department, Raipur (C-G). 3) Oistrict Education Offioer, Biiaspur (CG). 4) Biock Educauon Officer, Bilha, Distt. Biiaspur (CG). 5) T'ne Assistant Director, Tribai Deveiopment, Raigarh (CG). p/Vrit Petition under Artteie 226 of the Constitution of india) SB: Hon'bte Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Shri K.S. Pawar, counsel for the petitloner. Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advooate for the State. ORAL ORDER >.ss®don >ai Fei T'ne petitioner was initialiy appointed on 1-7-1995 as Assistant Teacher on a fixed pay scate of Rs. 1200/- on probation for a period of two years. After compietion of probation, t'ne petitioner was granted regular pay scaie of Rs. 1200-2040/-. 2) The question of iavi/ involved herein asto whether t'ne petitioner is entitled to reguiar pay scale with effect fronn the date of initial appointrnent or from the aate of completition of probation period. 3) Learned counsel appering for the petitioner as weii as for ihe State/respondents jointly submit that t'ne facts and question of taw involved in the petitton are the same to that of 'Writ Petition (S) No.5976 of 2006 (Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others), which was ailowed vider order dated 7-11 -2006. Learned counssl further submit that this Detition may be disposed of in the same terms. ___„— x f-?'' 2-- 4) ln vie'w of the above-stated submission made by learned counsei appearing for the parties, t'ne writ petition Is aliovr'ed in the same terms i.e., the petitioner ia entitled to the same reiief as was granted by the Madhya Pradesh State Administratlve Tribunal, Jabaipur in O.A.No.2745/89 (Madhukant Yakdu and 56 others Vs. State of IV!.P. & others) and subsequentiy, confirmed by the order dated 3-1-1994 passed by the Hon'bie Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.6892/93. The petitioner shalt be governed by the orctere passed by the Tribuna! as weli as by the Hon'ble Supreme Court (supra) accordingty. teiL SdJ- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge