IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17069 of 2008 SUKHDEO MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 2. 04.02.2011. None appears for the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the State is in appearance. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 28.07.2007 passed by the learned C.J.M., Patna, in Kadam Kuan P.S. Case No. 903 of 2007 whereby cognizance has been taken under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 326 of the I.P.C., Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section ¾ of the Explosive Substances Act against the petitioner. There is nothing on record to suggest the present stage of the case. I see no infirmity to interfere with the order impugned. The application is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to raise all his contentions at the time of framing of charges if the charges have already not been framed. With this observation, this application is disposed off. U.K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.)