IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 16TH AUGUST 2007 / 25TH SRAVANA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 39 of 2006(S) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.30833/2005 Dated 07/11/2005 .................... : PETITIONER. ---------------------------- M.B.PRABHAKARA PANICKER, S/O.BHASKARA KURUP, AGED 49 YEARS, ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, CHERTHALA, RESIDING AT MADATHILVALIYIL HOUSE, KANNANKARA P.O. THANNEERMUKKOM. BY ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY SMT.N.SANTHA PRI.K.A.BALAN SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO RESPONDENT: ------------- C.U.MATHAI, AGE AND NAME FATHER NOT KNOWN, SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-4. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM, SC, KSEB SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Antony Dominic, J. ======================== Con.Case (C).No.39 of 2006 ======================== Dated this the 16th day of August, 2007. JUDGMENT This Contempt Case is filed complaining that Annexure II order issued by the respondent was not in compliance with Annexure I order passed by this Court. Although notice was issued by this Court, respondent in the counter affidavit has produced Annexure R1(a) order dated 21.3.2006 withdrawing Annexure II order and giving effect to Annexure I order. In view of Annexure R1(a) order now produced by the respondent, I do not find that there has been any willful disobedience in the order passed by this Court. 2. Accordingly, without prejudiced to the contentions of the petitioner in the Writ Petition regarding the validity of Annexure R1(a) order, this Contempt Case is closed. Antony Dominic, Judge. ess 17/8