: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.522 OF 2005 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.263 OF 2005 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s Orders of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders ------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.S.M.Railkar for applicant Mr.S.P.Thorat for respondent No.1 CORAM : P.V.KAKADE, J. DATE : 12TH AUGUST, 2005 P.C.: 1. Heard both sides. Perused the record. 2. Both the courts below have concurrently found that the suit is for perpetual injunction is to be decreed on the ground that the appellant- defendant had threatened to encroach over the suit property. At the time of admission of the appeal the order of maintenance of status-quo as ad-interim relief was granted. There is no reason why the said : 2 : order should not be confirmed with a rider that as on today there is no encroachment made by the appellant-defendant on the suit property. Hence the application stands disposed of by confirming the order passed on 23.3.2005 in respect of maintenance of status-quo pending the appeal. The Application stands disposed of.