^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHAtfTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P,NO^,,20.6?:72Q03 PETITIONERS : 1. M/ >y <.^T ^/ RESPONENT^ ;^^& %y^ '^u^'- M/S. SHIVAM BUILDERS, THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR. RAJENDRA PRASAD MISHRA, MAITRI KUNJ RISALI, BHILAI (C.G.) RAJENDRA PRASAD MISHRA S/0 BRIJ BHUSAN MISHRA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS MAITRI KUNJ RISALI, BHILAI (C.G.) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LAW, JUSTICE AND COMPANY AFFAIRS AND ALSO, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI STATE BANK OF INDIA, A BANKING COMPANY RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF STATE BANK OF INDIA ACT, 1955, HAVING ITS INTERALIA AMONGST OFFICES A COMMERCIAL BRANCH AT RAVIBHAWAN, JAISTAMBH CHOWK, I^AIPUR. WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF WRITS IN THENATURE OFMANDAMUS. CERTIORARIAND/OR ORDBRtSl, AND/OR DIRECTlONIStIN THE NATURE OF WRITS K' r' XI-HC-22 '^^1^MI<^^^^^4^ 3ii^r xra-sR X»~^'2j0 ^ ^ ffl^?T[ Sh*1l^ ^ 2oaJ ?K(<b<iyry N^f^T ^RNi^'snl^T ^^RIW^I^Tt -t- ^^ '7\^<' '<• ^ •^' DIVISIONBENCH: HON'BLE SHRI AJS^NKATACHALAlMQORTHY, GJ |&l"10 BI..IESiHRIFAKrtRUt3E)IN.J. l29fl)^2004- ShiriManqf:^njape^^nselfo4^ Shri Vinay Harit, Sr. Stending C^unsel for the Unien 6f India, orrespondentNo.1. Shri Shailendra Shukla counsel f^r the respondent No.2. Following the decision of the Su|3ireme [Mardia Cheniical Ltd. Vs. Union of Indial feetitionstandsdismissed. v ere How^yer, jt i& made clear that |Eaken adion under Sertion 43(^ IReconsfructiQn of Fjnancjal ^sets ai| Interest Act, 2002 in such cases it w>ul<| jappeals under Section 17 of the k)rescribed therefor, to be counted with effectfrotn today Sd/- Chief Justice <=hl4(d4)r1 '^PR^lf ^ f^Tst ^^i< ^ ^NR 3:n^T Court in the matter of ^Q04AIRSCW2541), thewrif a secured creditor has of the Securitisation and i<i Enforcemerrt of Swyrity be opw totwrowere tofite within the limitation as fi^ Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [^ ife^