IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.1034 of 2008 1. Satyendra Kumar Singh, son of Late Bharat Singh 2. Ganesh Singh, son of late Bharat Singh 3. Lalan Singh, son of late Bharat Singh. Above all are resident of village Nawada, P.S. Rivilganj, District- Saran. … Petitioners. Versus The State Of Bihar .. Opposite Party. -------- For the petitioner :Mr. V. K. Singh, Adv. For the State Mrs. Indu Bala Pandey, APP. ----------- 3. 21.11.2011 The accused- petitioners have preferred this revision application against the order dated 9.6.2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-2, Chapra in Sessions Trial No. 395 of 2005 by which their petition under Section 228 Cr.P.C. has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case was instituted under Sections 341, 323, 325, 379 and 504/34 I.P.C. but after investigation charge-sheet has been submitted also for the offence punishable under Section 307 I.P.C. without any basis. Learned counsel for the State submits that the allegation against the accused is to have shot fire by firearms although it did not hit anyone but the action of the accused shows that they had intention to kill the 2 informant. There is also allegation and evidence that they have assaulted the informant mercilessly and due to intervention of the co- villagers they have fled away. She has further stated that there is material in the case-diary to show that the accused have also committed offence under Section 307 I.P.C. After hearing learned counsel for both the parties and on perusal of the carbon copy of the case-diary it appears that the learned trial court has considered the material in the case-diary and has come to the conclusion that an offence under Section 307 I.P.C. is also made out against the accused. Considering the facts and circumstances, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. This petition is dismissed. Kanchan (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)