IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11379 of 2011 VIVEK KUMAR, SON OF RAM SEVAK PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 20.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report. It is stated that the F.I.R. named accused as well as some unknown persons not only committed the murder but also snatched two mobile sets in course of the above stated occurrence. One mobile set was recovered from possession of the petitioner. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that mere recovery of snatched mobile set from possession of the petitioner does not show his involvement in commission of the murder. It is further contended by him that the petitioner has not been put on test identification parade as yet whereas he is languishing in jail custody since 25.10.2010. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghatti at Gaya in connection with Sherghatti P.S. Case No. 226 of 2010. Shahzad (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J )