Crl.M.No.25896-M of 2010(O&M) #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.No.25896-M of 2010(O&M) Date of Order: 6.10.2010 Pappi .....Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr. Sumeet Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Sindhu, Addl.A.G, Haryana. JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) Crl.M.No.47925 of 2010 Application is allowed as prayed for. Crl.M.No.25896-M of 2010 Prayer under Section 439 Cr.P.C is for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.26 dated 20.1.2010 under Sections 420/467/468/471/448/506/120-B IPC, P.S Saran Faridabad. As per allegations in the FIR lodged by the complainant- Jitender Kumar, wife-Sheela Devi of the petitioner in connivance with the petitioner, Rajpal Singh, Raja Ram and Virender by forging documents has got transferred in her name a plot No.35-A measuring 100 sq. yards situated in Khasra No.45, Killa No.10 in Dabua Colony, Tehsil and District Faridabad belonging to Angoori Devi (deceased)-mother of the complainant. Learned counsel submits that Sheela Devi had purchased the said plot by way of registered said deed from one Sarla Devi W/o Chander Parkash through one Rambir, who is not named in the FIR. He further states that the petitioner is neither the witness nor scribed the sale deed. In Crl.M.No.25896-M of 2010(O&M) #2# fact, wife of the petitioner is bonafide purchaser, who has been deprived of her right full title. He submits that there are no allegations of impersonation of said Angoori Devi and, therefore, no offence is alleged to have been committed by the petitioner qua the complainant. It is further submitted that all the co-accused have since been granted bail and that the petitioner is in custody since 18.6.2010. Learned state counsel, on instructions from ASI Devender Singh, submits that the investigations are over in the present case and the challan has been presented. Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case and keeping in view the fact that the investigations are over, I find that no useful purpose would be served to retain the petitioner in custody any longer. Accordingly, petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridabad. October 06, 2010 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE