IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 895 OF 2008 DIST.: MUMBAI Gati Limited & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents Ms. S.R. Kumbhat i/by Ms. Shilpa Kapil for the Petitioners Mrs. S.D. Shinde, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. CORAM: B ILAL NAZKI and A.A.KUMBHAKONI,JJ. DATE: AUGUST 1, 2008 P. C.:- This petition has been filed to quash the First Information Report. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and perused the file relating to grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner No.2. We feel that, prima facie, the F.I.R. discloses a case. Therefore, the F.I.R. cannot be quashed, but we understand that petitioner No. 2 has appeared on several occasions before the Investigating Officer as far as the investigation is concerned, and she has also been successful in getting bail in anticipation of her arrest. 3. With the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the Investigating Officer, who is present in Court, Mr. P.E. Tambe, A.P.I., we direct that petitioner No.2 shall make herself available to the I.O. on Monday, the 4th August, 2008, from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. and on Wednesday, the 6th August, 2008, from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. The I.O. may complete the interrogation of petitioner No.2 during those two days. However, she shall not be detained in the police station, when she appears, after 2 p.m. and she shall be released at 2 p.m. 4. The petition is accordingly disposed of. BILAL NAZKI, J. A.A. KUMBHAKONI, J.