IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.2162 OF 2008 Prasad Veg. Restaurant ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the petitioner. Ms. Imam Calcuttawalla, Assistant Government Pleader for the State. Mr. A.L. Gore for the respondent No.3. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE : 20TH FEBRUARY, 2009 P.C.: The learned counsel appearing for the society submits that they have already moved the Corporation for issuance of the occupancy certificate in accordance with law. It is also stated that they have deposited certain amounts and would pursue that application and try to obtain the occupancy certificate at the earliest. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the Corporation, however, states that their application has been received but they have to comply certain conditions of IOD and the moment it is done, the Corporation would issue the requisite certificate. On behalf of the Corporation, it is also stated that in the event the petitioner applies for the licence, the same would be considered in accordance with the provisions of Section 394 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act expeditiously. 3. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents, we do not see any reason to keep this matter pending before this court. 4. Writ petition stands disposed of. The respondents shall abide by their statements and act accordingly. CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.