H H I 03, * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONt,CAS(C)138/2011 % judgmtent Delivered on: 2064.2611 ASH OK I<UMAR RAIZADA Petitioner Though:. Mr. S.0 Singhal, Adv. versus • VIRENDER KUMAR & ORS Respondents Through : 'Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Adv: along with F ' 1 Inspr. Anand Lakra, DIU, and ASI Rajinder I . Singh, P.S. Vikas Pun., CORAM: I HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE- G.S.SISTANI . I H 1. Whether the Rëorters of local papers may be aIIôviedJto • see the judmé:h? • . 2. To be referred Reporter or not? • '. 3. Whether , the jOdmeht should be reported in the piget?. GSSSTANU (ORAL) 1. Petitioner had filed Criminal' Writ petition No.1808/2009,i which. was disposed of by a ij Order dated 18.12.2009. OperatiVe portion of the order dated 1842.2009 reads asunder: The contention' of the counsel for the petilioner Lc that- all the subseiJent events were brought to the notice of the, pollc' by the petitioner v/dc Ii/s càthplaint dated 24.8.2009, but the police has iieitber seized the original documehis from the banks nor recorded the statements of the acused persons and as per the petitioner the police is trying to help the accused •• I . I persons in active connivance with them. '• F Mr. Sanj/v i3handar,, counsel for the St at é on the other hand submits that the rigii1a/ title documents were seized by the police immediately when the complaint was f/led by the petitioner so fr the burro wer Alok Gupta is co,lcc, -ned. Mr. Bhandari further states that as for as other two bank notices are concerned, the investigation .15 still in progress. counsel further submits that even the petitioner has not supplied necessary documents soa' to help the police to properly investigate the mat/er. • Be that as it may, let. whatever documents the pet itio4r wishes to, supply 1-0 tile cqncrned 1.0. be made available by the betitioner to the concerned 1.0. withih a period of one week from the date of this order and the concetied 1.0. shall proceed in the matter with proper investigation and shall complete the same i.'vit'hin a period of three months from the date of ti is order. 3 coN i: cs () .1381201.1 . . . . Page 1 of Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. Signature Not Verified 5 H it i.5 further directed that the investigation shall he personally ,ñonitbred by * the AG' oft/ic concerned DistricL c3riqvnce of the petit ioner is that responden hav :faild to copiy with the directions contained in the aforesaidf ordr and proper investigation has not been carried out by the respondbnts, i.erned counsel for the petitioner submits sale de*ed of the petitioner's property has been forged by the unknown prons and on the basis of forged documents loans have been raised H from three banks i.e. Punjab National Bank, Bank of Rajasthan and I f I Delhi Nagrik Sahkari Bank. While, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that substantial payments have been reëived by Delhi Nagrik Sahkari Bank, respondents have failed tocary out proper investigation in the matter with respect to loans ganted by Punjab National Bank and Bank of Rajasthän, which has resulted into mental and physical harassment to the petitionr. Le'arned counsel for the respondents submits that poper. investigation has been carried out under the supervisio:n of Assistant Conimissioner of Police, as directed by the High Court ad a charge sheet has also been filed. Counsel further sbmits that petitioner has already moved an application before the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate seeking directions fbr further and proper investigation.. Nodoubt the allegations made by the petitioner are rav 1e and serious, however, having regard to the fact that petitioner has already moved an application before the Metropolitan Magitrate, coNJ;cAs(c) 13812012 Page 2 of 3 • . ••• . j I do not find it a fit case to initiate cbtempt proceedi 'ngs against th e respondent. Accordingly, contempt petitiOn stands dismissed. .1 Needless to. say, the concerned Metropolitan Mastraté will cnsider the application of the petitioner in accbrdane with law ahd pass appropriate orders expeditiously. : 6. DSTI to counsel for the paies. . . H G.S..SISTANI, J.' April 20, 2011 . 4. 1 • . 4 . 1 •. . . CONJ:cAs(c) 73812013