1 33----cac.360.11 ndm FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 360 OF 2011 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (stamp) NO. 14429 OF 2011 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Ms Manjiri S. Parasnis for the Applicant. Mr. Sachin Dhakephalkar for the Respondents. CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 21 st November, 2011. P.C. . Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. 2 The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents opposes the prayer for condonation of delay on the ground that there is absolutely no explanation for long delay of 128 days. 3 However, in view of the averments made in the application, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Rule is made absolute in terms 2 33----cac.360.11 of prayer clause (a) subject to condition of the Applicant paying costs of Rs.5,000/- to the Respondents within a period of four weeks from today. [ A.S.OKA, J ]