IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 7TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 18TH MAGHA 1929 WP(C).No. 37808 of 2007(A) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ K.P.SULAIMAN, NATIONAL TRADE LINKS, P.P.VI/49D, CHEPPILODE, PERAYAM P.O., NEDUMANGAD. BY ADV. SRI.N.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR SRI.V.K.SHAMUSUDHEEN RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICE, NEDUMANGAD. 2. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.37808 of 2007 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of February, 2008 JUDGMENT The prayer in this writ petition is to direct the respondents to issue delivery notes to the petitioner. A statement has been filed on behalf of the respondents and it is stated that the reason for not issuing delivery notes to the petitioner is on account of his not furnishing the details of the name and particulars of the purchasers as required under the Act. It is also stated that the books of accounts were not available to his place of business. 2. It is now submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after the writ petition was filed, by notice dated 17.12.2007, the first respondent called upon the petitioner to furnish details regarding the name and address of the supplying dealers in order to enable him to issue the delivery notes. It is submitted by the petitioner that in reply to the said notice all details have been furnished. In view of this, I dispose of this writ petition directing the first respondent that if the details said to have been furnished in WPC37808/2007 2 response to notice dated 17.12.2007 was received, he shall consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the details so furnished and take a decision in the matter. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of four weeks of a production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE csl