IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 21678 of 1999 Between: B. Suseelamma W/o. Venkataiah R/o. Ranipet, Gudur, Nellore district. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Gudur Municipality, Gudur, Rep. by it's Chair Person. Nellore district 2 The Commissioner, Gudur Municipality, Gudur, Nellore district. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in not executing the lease deed in my favour in respect of Shop No. 10 (back row) in the New Shopping Complex at Gudur, Old Bus Stand pursuant to the knocking of bid in my favour in the public auction held on 15-09-99 and consequently direct the Respondents to execute the lease deed and put the petitioner in possession of Shop No. 10 (Bank Row) in the New Shopping Complex, Gudur Old Bus Stand. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.P.CHANDRAMOULI Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR. E. SAMBASIVA PRATAP The Court made the following: Oral order:- This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to execute the lease deed and put the petitioner in possession of Shop No. 10 (Back row) in the new shopping complex, Gudur Old Bus Stand pursuant to the knocking of bid in his favour in the public auction held on 15-09-1999. This court, at the time of admission of the writ petition, on 15-10-1999, granted interim order to the effect that it is open to the Municipality to enter into an agreement with the petitioner in respect of the shop in question; and if the respondents are not inclined to give the shop to the petitioner, they shall not let it out to any other third party until further orders. Since the relief sought in the main writ petition and the interlocutory application is one and the same and this court on 15-10-1999 granted interim orders, no further adjudication in this writ petition is required. It is also submitted by the learned standing counsel for the respondents that the period of lease has also been expired. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. ______________________ ELIPE DHARMA RAO, J Dt. 14-07-2005 Pvks/* To 1 The Chair Person, Gudur Municipality, Gudur, Nellore district 2 The Commissioner, Gudur Municipality, Gudur, Nellore district. 3 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{BDLNM}