IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.48630 of 2008 CHANDESHWAR PRASAD Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 6 28.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State and for the informant who has appeared suo motu. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Section 376(G) of the Indian Penal Code. Urging false implication it is submitted that final form has been submitted and medical report does not confirm the allegations. The informant is the victim herself identifying and naming the petitioner in the First Information Report standing by the same in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the informant submits that no sooner summons are issued to her she shall appear and depose in the trial. The application is rejected. If so advised, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after the informant deposes in the trial. S.Sb/- (Navin Sinha, J.)