IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6769 of 2006. Shri Hari Prasad Budhia & Another Vs. State & Others Date of Order ::: 10/09/2008. Hon'ble Mr. Prem Shanker Asopa, J. Mr. R.D. Rastogi and Mr. N.S. Chauhan, Counsel for the petitioners **** Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. The writ petition was filed at the stage of issuance of the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 way back on 08.03.2006 and since then the writ petition is being adjourned from time to time. Thereafter, the notification under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued during the pendency of the writ petition and the petitioner was also granted four week's time to amend the writ petition on 09.07.2008, but the same has not been amended so far, and on 09.09.2008 no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners and it was ordered that in case no one appears, then appropriate orders will be passed on the next date. Today, Mr. R.D. Rastogi with Mr. N.S. Chauhan, Advocates are present and again seeking time to amend the writ petition. There is no justification to grant further time. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it proper that the petitioners be given liberty to file fresh writ petition challenging the notification under Section 6, along with Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as premature with the aforesaid liberty. (Prem Shanker Asopa) J. ashok/