W.P. No.21520/2011 (S) Govind Gupta vs. State of M.P. & Ors 20.12.2011 Heard Shri S. K. Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for a relief of quashing the advertisement dated 8.11.2011 or in the alternative for a direction to the respondent authorities to continue him in service till appointment on regular basis are made on the post of Instructor/Machinist. In view of the order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in W.P No.11229/2010 (S) and connected matters, no case for upholding the petitioner's appointment or quashing the advertisement is made out. However, it is seen that the petitioner has directly approached this Court with a request to continue him in service till fresh appointments are made, without approaching the authorities by filing a representation in that respect. In the circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner files a representation alongwith a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition before the respondent authorities, requesting them to permit 1 W.P. No.21520/2011 (S) Govind Gupta vs. State of M.P. & Ors him to continue on the post of Guest Instructor/Machinist till appointment on regular incumbents are made, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the petitioner's representation expeditiously, in accordance with law. The petitioner may also move the authorities with an application to continue him in service till decision of his representation. With the aforesaid direction, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. C.C as per rules. ( R. S. JHA ) J U D G E mms/- 2