-$<; \ c^ /-^^/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.(S) No. G^S' /200~7- PETITIONER -••^•- ^ ^'n^- •j^ ,?I^i'' ffe'-'' RESPONBENT'S ^ '•;_ 'yv,.-^.'' ;.:,::'~-^^/ ^0"^^ ^0^ > \^.^N cv^^^ ^ VERSUS Smt. Shashi Prabha Gangwar (Now Sonpure), W/o. Shri Shashikant Sonpure), aged about 40 years, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Girl's Middle School - Darri, Block - Katghora, Distt. - Korba (C.G.) 1. State of Chhattisgrh, Through - The Secretary Department of Education / Tribal Welfare Depari:ment D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, District- Korba (C.G.) 3. District Education Officer, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) 4. Block Education Officer, Block - Katghora, Distt. -Korba WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF SUITABLE WRIT, WRITS, DIRECTION ETC. TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER, JthUtfc... HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH : HOM'BLE MR. SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI. J. WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.545 OF 2007 Petitioner : Smt. Shashi Prabha Gangwar (Naw Sonpure) vereus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and others WRIT PETITION (S.l N0.648 OF 2007 Petitioner versus Respondents Smt. Nilima Tirky (After marriage Nilima Toppo) State of Ghhattisgarh and another WRIT PETmON (S.l N0.549 OF 2007 Petitioner : Anand Kumar Toppo versus ResDondents : State of Chhattisgarh and another Present : Mr.A.S.RajputandMr.A.N.Bhakta.counselforthe petiUoners. Mrs. Anju Ahuja, Deputy Govemment Advocate for the State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on 25* Day-ofJanuary, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the parties joinUy submit that the facte and question of law involved in the present wr'rt peb'tions r Qopal are squarely covered by the decision of this Gourt in the case of Sushil Tiwari and others vs. State Govemment of ChhaWsgarh and offiers (Writ PetiUon (S.) No.5976 of 2006), dated 7-11-20W. 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the vnit petitions are allowed in terms of the decision of this Court in ttie matter of Sushil TTwari and others vs. Sfate Govemment of ChhaWsgarti and olhers (Supra). No order as to costs. 3. A copy of this order be ptaced on the record of the connected writ petitions. ~—- Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri