IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.47598 of 2008 Anand Pandey, son of Kedarnath Pandey, village Jagardari Bagahawa, PS Bhore, Dist. Gopalganj - Petitioner. Vs. 1) The State of Bihar, 2) Rama Kant Tiwary, village Jagardari Bagahawa, PS Bhore, Dist. Gopalganj – Opp. Parties. 2 4.8.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order, dated 28.8.2008 passed in S.T. No. 283/1998 by FTC III, Gopalganj by which the application filed on behalf of the petitioner to recall PWs 3, 4 and 5 has been rejected. The ground for rejecting the application is that the petitioner has specifically stated that he could not cross examine PW 3 and draw her attention to certain statements made by her under section 161 Cr.P.C., likewise, for the same reason the petitioner wishes to recall PWs 4 and 5 in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that all the offences are compoundable expect section 307 of the Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the parties are going to file an application for compromise as far as other sections are concerned. This court cannot make any comment on the submissions made aforesaid. However, as far as the order impugned is concerned, I find that there is no illegality in it. This application is disposed of. haque ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)