IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 1st Bail Application No. 1010 of 2010 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE Ramesh .….Applicant (In jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party ___________________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 53/2010 U/s 304 IPC, PS Kathgodam Kotwali, Haldwani, District Nainital ___________________________________________________________________ November 24, 2010 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Heard Ms. Kamakshi Tripathi, the learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, the learned Brief Holder for the State. The first information report does name the applicant accused, who has been arrested on the basis of hearsay evidence and on circumstantial evidence, the chain of which seems to be incomplete. Considering the facts and circumstances that have been brought on the record coupled with the fact that the co-accused has also been granted bail and without commenting on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail at this stage. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Ramesh be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 53/2010 under Section 304 IPC, PS Kathgodam Kotwali, Haldwani, District Nainital subject to his executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of CJM, Nainital. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) 24.11.2010 PRABODH