IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal WP No.408 of 2010 DATE OF DECISION : MARCH 31, 2010 VEERA SHARMA ....... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .... RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA PRESENT: Received by post. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab. AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral) The application received on the administrative side has been treated as a petition on the judicial side. As per the petition, on 17.2.2010, Darshan Parkash, husband of the petitioner, had been taken away. Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from ASI Baljinder Singh, states that Darshan Parkash is at home and had not been picked up. Statement of Darshan Parkash had also been taken by the authorities in this regard. In view of the statement of learned counsel for the respondent- State, there is no cause to continue with the proceedings and, therefore, the petition is dismissed. March 31, 2010 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 2 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?