IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.42896 of 2010 ----------- 1. Alakh Narain Singh, son of late Triveni Singh, resident of village Bhatarhi (Beda), P.S. Sasaram (M), District Rohtas. 2. Suraj Singh son of Jagdish Singh, resident of village Beda,P.S. Sasaram (M), District Rohtas ………. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Raju Sah, son of Ram Nagina Sah, resident of village Bishrampur, P.O. Chotkichenari, P.S. Shivsagar District Rohtas. … Opposite Parties ------- 02/ 26.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is an accused for offences punishable under sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that allegation against the petitioners is that they negotiated with the complainant for sale of land and received advance for the same, but even after execution of the deed of agreement and receipt of the money, they are not executing the sale-deed nor are they returning the advance money paid to them. He further submits that this case appears to be a dispute with regard to specific performance of contract, which is merely civil in nature. He also submits that already a title suit is pending between the parties with respect to the aforesaid matter. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within fifteen days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in the court below, both the petitioners, namely, 2 Alakh Narain Singh and Suraj Singh are directed to be enlarged on bail on executing bail bonds of Rs.10,000.00 (ten thousand ) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram in connection with Complaint Case No. 1612/2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. MPS/ ( S. N. Hussain, J. )