IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No.162 of 2010 Date of decision : October 28, 2010 Sat Pal and others …Appellants. Versus Jagdish Dutt and another …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surjit Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Appellants : Mr. Naresh Kumar Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Advocate. Surjit Singh, J (Oral) Heard and gone through the record. 2. Parties agree, through their counsel, that the share of plaintiffs-respondents in the income from the joint property may be assessed at `2,000/- a month and decrees passed by the two Courts below may be modified accordingly. 3. In view of the above concessional statement of the parties, instead of an amount of `91,935/-, decree for a sum of `72,000/-, with interest at the rate of 9% (rate of interest remains the same as awarded by the first Appellate Court) is passed in favour of the plaintiffs-respondents and against the defendants-appellants. Appeal stands disposed of accordingly. October 28, 2010(sd) ( Surjit Singh ), J Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?