rpa IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT CONTEMPT CONTEMPT PETITION NO.65 OF 2007 PETITION NO.65 OF 2007 PETITION NO.65 OF 2007 IN IN IN NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4074 OF 2006. OF MOTION NO. 4074 OF 2006. OF MOTION NO. 4074 OF 2006. IN IN IN SUIT SUIT SUIT NO. 1583 OF 2006 NO. 1583 OF 2006 NO. 1583 OF 2006 ....................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda . of Coram, appearances, Court’s . Orders or directions and . Registrar’s Order Court’s or Judge’s Order ....................................................... Mr.Tapan Deshpande i/b. Amarchand & Mangaldas & S.A. Shroff & Co. for the petitioner. Mr.D.V.Merchant for respondent no.1 CORAM CORAM CORAM : S.C.DHARAMADHIKARI, J. : S.C.DHARAMADHIKARI, J. : S.C.DHARAMADHIKARI, J. DATE DATE DATE : 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. : 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. : 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2007. P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- 1. Both side inform me that the order dated 4th December, 2006 which is allegedly voilated in this case, has been modified by subsequent order dated 24th July, 2007 and the modified orders and directions have been duly complied with. Under such circumstances nothing survives in this contempt petition and it is accordingly disposed off. (S.C.DHARMADHKARI, (S.C.DHARMADHKARI, (S.C.DHARMADHKARI, J.) J.) J.)