IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1663 of 2006 RAJESH KUMAR PURI @ RAJESH PURI, SON OF HRIDYA NAND PURI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KANIHAR, P.S.- SUGAULI, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN :--- PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MOTIHARI, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, BLOCK SUGAULI, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN. 4. THE CIRCLE OFFICER, BLOCK SUGAULI, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN. 5. THE GENERAL MANAGER, BIHAR STATE SUGAR CORPORATION LIMITED, SHILA SADAN, BORING CANAL ROAD, PATNA-1 :--- RESPONDENTS. ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. J.K.Giri, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, A/C to A.A.G.-I. For Sugar Corporation : Mr. Gyan Shankar, Advocate. ====== 2. 27.01.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the counsel for the Bihar State Sugar Corporation Limited. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the notice issued by the Circle Officer, Sugauli dated 28.02.2002, Annexure-5, whereunder he has been asked to remove his temporary kiosk from the lands of the Sugauli Sugar Factory. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that authorization to establish the kiosk was given to the petitioner by the authorities of the sugar factory vide agreement dated 16.11.2002, Annexure-2. - 2 - 4. Perusal of agreement dated 16.11.2002 indicates that the same is not registered and it does not appear from the same that the officer who signed the agreement was authorized to let out the lands of the sugar factory for raising the kiosk. Accordingly, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The writ petition is dismissed. P.K.P. (V.N.Sinha,J.)