BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Saturday, the Twenty Ninth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.14117 of 2011 S. NAGULAKUMAR ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED 5 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SUSEENDRAM POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMAIR DT CR NO.309/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.BALAJI Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for offences under sections 302 and 392 IPC in Crime No.309 of 2011, the petitioner has come up with this petition seeking anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of prosecution, the petitioner is the fifth accused in this case. His brother was earlier done to death. In respect of the same, there is a murder case, in which, the present deceased was the accused. In order to eliminate him, according to the case of prosecution , the petitioner had engaged hireling, through him, he killed the deceased. 3. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the second accused in this case has got previous cases including an attempt to murder case etc. The second accused is none other than the maternal uncle of the petitioner. There is also a murder case pending against the second accused. 4. Having regard to the allegations that the petitioner has engaged hireling to eliminate the arch rival, who allegedly killed his brother, it is not a case, where anticipatory bail can be granted. Apart from that there are number of cases. It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that there is a murder case and attempt to murder case against A2. He is a rowdy element and the deceased was also involved in a murder. 5. Having regard to the arch rivalry between two groups, which resulted in number of murders, I am of the view that it is not a fit case for grant of antitipatory bail and this petition deserves only dismissal and accordingly this petition is dismissed. sd/- 29/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SUSEENDRAM POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMAIR DT 2 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. SB:04/11/2011 1p 3c ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14117 of 2011 Date :29/10/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/