IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminial Misc. No.M- 1264 of 2009 Date of decision : 14.10.2009 Harish Chander Dhamija .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. G.S.Kaura, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. B.B.S.Teji, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab S. D. ANAND, J. Reply filed on behalf of respondent no.1 by Shri Bhupinder Singh Sidhu, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sarabha Nagar today in Court is taken on record. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that he would be content if a direction is issued to the respondent to the effect that they shall issue a notice under Section 160 Cr.P.C. to the petitioner as and when his presence is required in the Police Station. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the allowance of that request. The petition shall stand disposed of accordingly. The respondents shall issue a notice under Section 160 Cr.P.C. to the petitioner whenever the presence of the latter is required in connection with investigation of the case. October 14, 2009 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE Note: Whether to be referred to Reporter : Yes/No