1 56 sa 553.10.doc K IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.553 OF 2010 Smt.Roshani Vasantrao Mokal ..Appellant. Vs. Lasalgaon Shikshak Sahayyak Mandal & Ors. ..Respondents. Mr. Sachin Pawar i/b Mr. Anilkumar Patil for the appellant. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED : 20/12/2010. PC: 1 Heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2 This appeal is directed against the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the courts below in a suit instituted by the appellant-plaintiff for declaration that she is entitled to get the pay-scale of B.Sc. B.Ed. teacher with all consequential benefits and increments with pay difference to the tune of Rs.25,500/- for the period from 11.07.1991 to December, 1996 with interest. The courts below after having considered the entire material/evidence on record have recorded a categoric finding that the appellant had accepted the appointment on the B.Sc.D.Ed. pay scale and therefore, she is not entitled to the 2 56 sa 553.10.doc pay-scale of B.Sc.B.Ed. i.e. trained Graduate teacher. I do not find any error of law committed by the courts below. Considering that there are concurrent findings of fact recorded by the courts below, and that there is sufficient material on record to sustain those findings and considering that no substantial question of law is either raised or involved in the appeal, the second appeal deserves to be dismissed. Order accordingly. (D.B.Bhosale, J.)