IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 1006 of 2004 (M/B) 1. Smt. Shanti Rani Goel W/o Sri Goel S. Pal 2. Smt. Rita Goel D/o Sri Goel S. Pal Both R/o 3 Court Lane, Civil Lines, Delhi-110054. ……… Petitioners Versus State of Uttaranchal & others. ………. Respondents Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. A. Rab, learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State. Hon. V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J. Hon. Irshad Hussain, J. 1. Heard Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. A. Rab, learned Addl. Government Advocate, who accepted the notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 2. 2. The learned public prosecutor makes a statement that the Investigating Agency would not prefer to arrest the accused persons here in view of the fact that this matter amounts to a civil dispute. 3. In that view, the writ petition is disposed of, but, with a direction that, in case, the Investigating Agency decides to arrest the petitioners, then, 8 days prior notice shall be given to the petitioners. (Irshad Hussain, J.) (V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J.) 13.10.2004 13.10.2004 G