IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1766 of 2009 M/S GENERAL ELECTRIC WORKS THRU ITS PROP. PARITOSH KAMAL S/O SRI KAMAL NARAYAN JAH, R/O. GANGJALA WARD NO.13,P.S.SAHARSA, DISTT-SAHARSA………PETITIONER Versus 1. B.S.E.B. THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, VIDYUT BHAWAN, BAILY ROAD, PATNA & ORS. ----------- 06/ 06-Sep-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties. An opportunity was given to the petitioner to file a representation and that has been disposed of by order contained in Annexure-D to the show-cause. In that view of the matter the contempt application is finally disposed of. It goes without saying that if the petitioner is not satisfied with the decision taken on his representation it will be at liberty to pursue its grievance through appropriate proceeding or suit in accordance with law. perwez ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.) (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)