HIGH COIJRT OF CHHAr[TISGARH AT BILA8FUR PETmONER WRIT PETITION (8) No. 5085 of2009 Satyacharan Shrivastava, son of Shri Gopindra Prasad Shrivastava, aged about 58 years. presently posted on dq>utation as Assistant Grade III, Tehsil Office Manora, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. VERSUS RE8PONDENT8 : 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through tfae Secretary, Revenue Departmexit Mantralaya. D.K.8. BhawaiL Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. Secretary, General Administration Department Mantralaya, D.K.8. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Chhattisgarfi Infrastrocture , Developme^it Corporation Through the Managing Director, Transport Section, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Collector, Jashpur, Jashpir, Disfrict Jashpw Chhattisgarh. WMT PETITION U1SDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUnON OF INDIA SB^iioii'ble Shri Satish K. Agiuhotri, J. Pmsent: Ms. Shamiik Sm^iai, Advocate for fhe petitioner. Shri Y.S/ITiakur, Deputy Advocate General with Smt. Smita Ghai, Panel Lawyer foi' the State/respondents 1, 2 & 4. OM)ER(QRAL) (Passed on 07th day of September, 2009) 1, I^eamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that ttie case ofthe petitioner is under consideration for absorption in accordaBce with the scheme dated 04/10th December, 2007 (Annexure P/5). The petitioner has beei-s infonned about Ns superamiuation which is to take place on 25 September, 2009. Ms. Smghai further submits tiat if the case of the ^."\ ^f/ petitioner for absorptioii is not de^ided before the date of his syperannuation, the petitioner may suffer loss of non-graatmg of retiral benefits and other consequential benefits. It is prayed that a directiofi may be issued to tbe respondents for considering fhe case ofthe petitionCT for absorption before flie date ofhis superannuation i.e. 25 September, 2009. 2. SM TTiakur appearing with Smt Ghai submit that even ifthe case ofthe petitioner is considered after the retirement^ the petitioner should not have any apprehension with regard to grant of retiral and other comecpential benefits which the petftioner may be entitled, iffhe absorption is done prior to superamiuation. Shri Iliakur furtter submite that the case of fhe petitioner would be considered as esqpeditiously as possible^ preferably within a period ofeight weeks from today. 3. Iji view ofthe foregomg, accorditig to leamed ^ounsel for the petitioaer, nothing survives for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, tfae petition is disposed of Sd/- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Amit