IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 1901 of 2010. Decided on: May 7, 2010. Mohinder Lal ….. Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. …… Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.B.Misra, Judge. For the petitioner (s) Mr. Trilok Jamwal, Advocate. For the Respondents Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. AG for respondents No. 1 & 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The Writ Petition is filed with the following prayers: “a) That the writ in the nature of Certiorari may kindly be issued for quashing the impugned transfer order dated 4/20010 (Annexure P-1). b) That the writ of mandamus may kindly be issued directing the respondent No. 1 and 2 to allow the petitioner to continue working at the present place of posting i.e. Sub-Division Bharari Distt. Bilaspur H.P.” 2. Pointing out also the fact that the petitioner is physically challenged with disability to the extent of 65%, petitioner has submitted Annexure P-6 (representation), before the second respondent. There will be direction to the second respondent-competent authority, to look into said representation and take appropriate action in accordance with law, adverting to the submissions made by the petitioner in the representation. This shall be done within a period of one week from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. 2 3. It is also made clear that while taking decision as above, the second respondent will also see as to whether it is possible to accommodate the petitioner in any of the two places, pointed out in the representation. Till orders are passed as above, the petitioner may not be compelled to join duty at the present station. 4. With these observations, the Writ Petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice May 7, 2010. ( Justice R.B.Misra ), (karan/vs) Judge.