1 crap3090.10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3090 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3089 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant VERSUS Shankar MahajanJakewad and ors. ...Respondents ..... Shri S.G.Nandedkar, A.P.P. for the applicant/State Shri B.N.Gadegaonkar, advocate for the respondents. ..... CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J. DATED : 25 th March, 2011 PER COURT : 1 Heard Shri S.G.Nandedkar, learned APP for the applicant. 2 This is an application preferred by the applicant for condonation of delay of 3 days caused in filing the accompanying Criminal Application seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 30.4.2010, passed by the 2 crap3090.10 learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Naigaon (Bazar), in S.C.C. No. 347 of 2004. 3 For the reasons stated in the application, it appears that the applicant has explained the delay satisfactorily and it further appears that the delay caused in filing the accompanying application is not willful, deliberate and intentional and same deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. 4 Hence, present Criminal Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' thereof and delay of 3 days caused in filing the accompanying application seeking leave to file appeal stands condoned and accompanying Criminal Application be registered and numbered. The present Criminal Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE), JUDGE. dbm/crap3090.10