y IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH é 1, AT BILASPUR ’ M.A. No. CH? 2002 Division Benchi/ (Appeal u/s 173 M.V. Act 1988 valued at Rs. 11,62}000/— for Enhancement) 1/ Appellants/Applicants n i Claimants 1. Abdul Razzak, S/o Shri Abdul Jabbar, aged about 43 years, 2. Smt. Sakila, W/o Abdul Razzak, aged about 4O years Both R/o Aapapura, Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G.) Both through Anwar, M.P. Tobacco Co. Pulgaon Chowk, P.S. Pulgaon Distt. Durg (C.G.) VERSUS Shrawan Kumar, S/o Dharam Singh, No 106, B.T. Road, Calcutta 35 Post and P.S. Puskura Midnapur (W.B.) Owner of vehicle WB—23-5791 Kulbir Singh, S/o Prahalad Singh R/o 202, Stand Mumbai Truck Driver WB-23-579l RESPONDENTS . Non-Applicants A ' hhattisgarh High Court Campus, Biiaspur Case N0.M A-No» #95” 6f Qw‘il‘ ékMfégL£gmmL Appellant/s Versus k: Rgspondent/s V‘ i Appellant With / by Shrl Vcmhwmw / a wW Advocate Respondent With / by Shn @“Ahmth Wfm Advocate W manwwyug amid kiMLa. +h£lvuJSJ37NJq LM cam a {kg~ May, ,AWARD (Passed on 4%” Ham/, 2w? ) h Parties file a compromise petition The terms are just. We ’ kl nereby record the compromise and pass an award In terms of compromltie and order that appeiiant res ogdentgshall pay to $w WJ. respondent/ app Ilant a sum of RsZ5W‘1’ /by way of compensation WWW “:E‘;:_'{‘::_W’fjf_5__'__% per C Sdl- j Justice Dillp Raosaheb I Deshmukh f ., t Sd/- ’— H hhéember- LokAdalat 2 Member LokAdalat 1g ourt of Chhattlsgarh Bilaspur High Court of Chhattls h Bllaspur gar -