IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.23734 of 2011 Date of Decision. 20.12.2011 Rakesh Kumar son of Sohan Singh, Government Contractor, Telwandi Chowk, Faridkot and others .....Petitioners Versus The State of Punjab through its Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department, Punjab Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Baltej Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he will be satisfied if the representations (Annexure P-1 to P-3), which have been issued on behalf of petitioner No.1 claiming the amount for the works done, is considered by respondent No.3 and appropriate decision is taken regarding the payment. The respondent No.3 shall consider the demand made through the representations under Annexure P-1 to P-3 within a period of two months and if the liability is admitted, the amount shall be forthwith released preferably within a period of one month from that date. 2. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 20, 2011 Pankaj*