MC 3446/2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY The petitioner is a hawker of S.K. Oil in Nayeralga Part-III and her lic ence was suspended on 12.10.2009 by the S.D.O.(Civil), Bilasipara on the ground that the hawker had indulged in various irregularities in conducting her busines s. The Misc. application is filed by the writ petitioner where an order dat ed 16.9.2010 (Annexure-6) of the SDO (Civil), Bilasipara has been enclosed for a nother S.K. Oil hawker licencee Md. Jaynal Abedin of Mayerchar Part-I whose lic ence also was suspended on similar ground as was in the case of the petitioner. However the authorities on consideration of the admission made by the licencee a nd to ensure uninterrupted supply of S.K. Oil in the area have issue an warning to the licencee, Jaynal Abedin and permitted him to carry on his business. Mr. G.P. Bhowmik, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the authorities are likely to show similar consideration for the pe titioner and only because the matter is pending in the Court, the necessary orde rs are not being passed. Accordingly it is submitted that WP(C) 4669 may be clos ed with the direction to the authorities to consider the petitioner on the same footings as the other S.K. Oil licencee in the area i.e. Jaynal Abedin. Considering the above submissions and after hearing Mr. P.N. Gogoi, the learned Government Advocate for the respondents, I close this petition by direct ing the Sub-Divisional Officer (Civil), Bilasipara (respondent No.2) to consider the entitlement of the present petitioner, to a similar order as was granted to another licence, Md. Jaynal Abedin. If the applicant is on the same footing nec essary order may be passed by the said authority. The Misc. case stands disposed of accordingly.