HIfflH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILA8PUR W.P. (St No.6196/2007 ^ PETITIONER RESPONDENTS Azunuddin, s/o Late Naunuddin, aged about 60 years, Occupation Service as Gaagman (Painter), r/o KotaWaidNo.l2,Raipur (C.G.) Versus 1. State of Chhatdsgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Public Works, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Finance Secretary, State of Ctlhattisgarh, D.K.S, Bhawaa, Raipur (C.G). 3. Executi.ve Engiueer, P.W.D. Vidhan Sabha Dwision, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Sub-Divisional Officer, Sub- DivisionNo.ll, PWD Distt. Raipur (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THB CONSTITUTION OP INDIA Appewance: Stui Yogesh Pandey, Counsel for the petitioner. SIuiN.K. Agrawstl, Seiuor Advocate and Deputy Advocate General with Shri A.S. Kachliwaha, Govt Advocate for fhe State/respondents. ORAL^ORDBR (31.10.2007) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. J. Heaid. Learued couasel for fhe petitioner subxaits that a permanent Gaag-niau is to be retired at fhe age of 62 years ia accordance wiffa the Chhattisgwh Shaskiya Sevak (AdhwarshiId-Ayu) Adhiruyam 1967 read with Fundamental Rules, 56, He also submlts that fhe point raised has been decided by fhis Court iu bateh ofmatters i.e. W.P. No.108/2005 and rnany other connected niattersori 04.01.2007, reported in 2007 (2i C.G.L^J. 29 /Goidnd & Others vs. State ofC.G. and others) aad this matter is squarety covered by that decisioa, wtucll niay be disposed ofon fbe same tErms. W.P.(S)No.6196/2007 ^ Learaed counsel for the State fairly agrees fhat this aiatter is Govered by tbe said decision. However, he submite that in some matters the State has filed writappeals. Unless soiue interun order is passed, merely on account of JSliag of fhe writ appeal, hearuig of fhis writ petition caanot be kept in abeyance, when fhe matter is squarely covered by the said judgm.ent In ftie result, fhis petition is aBowed. It is dteposed of in terms of the order dated 04.01.2007 passed in W.P. No. 108/2005 and other cortaected matters. No order as to cost. \ Sd/- ; SumtKuinaK^inha 1 Judge J\ Rao/ Shyna ^