1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9422 OF 2009 M/s.Bombay Stone Quarries .. Petitioners. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.B.R.Zaveri for the petitioners. Mr.Y.S.Jahagirdhar, Sr.Counsel with Mr.K.G.Mhatre i/b Doijode Associates for respondent nos.2 and 3. Ms.P.S.Cardozo A.G.P. for the State. CORAM : D.B. BHOSALE, J. DATED : 23RD NOVEMBER, 2009 P.C. . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This petition arises from the orders passed by the revenue authorities in RTS proceedings. By the last order dated 25.8.2009 passed by respondent no.1, the orders passed by the authorities below have been set aside. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 claim right in the property on the basis of the unregistered lease deed dated 12.7.1983. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 claim that they are in possession of the suit property whereas according to the petitioners they are in possession of the part thereof. Mr.Zaveri, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that the petitioners intend to institute a civil suit for appropriate relief and in view thereof they have no objection for issuing directions to the parties to maintain status quo insofar as mutuation entry No.151 of 29.11.2004 is concerned. Mr.Jahagirdhar, learned 2 senior counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3 also on instructions from respondent no.2, who is present in the court submits that the respondents will not create any third party interest in the suit property for the period of 12 weeks. In the circumstances I am not recording reasons and I am satisfied that the following order shall meet the ends of justice: The parties are directed to maintain status quo insofar as mutuation entry No.151 of 29.11.2004 is concerned. It is open to the petitioners to institute a suit, as aforementioned, for appropriate relief. If any such suit is filed, the concerned court shall decide the same on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made in these proceedings by the revenue authorities. It is also open to the petitioners to seek appropriate interim relief in the suit they propose to file against respondent nos.2 and 3. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 shall not create any third party interest in the suit property for a period of 12 weeks from today. While passing this order I shall not be understood to have examined merits of the case and/or expressed any opinion on the rights of the parties in the suit property or on the issue of possession in respect thereof. With these observation the writ petition is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)