HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Wnt Petition (Art. 227) No.151 of2010 PETITIONERS/: (Revisioners) RESPONDENT: 1. Smt. Saroj Devi, wife of Shri Dilbagh Singh, aged about 35 years. 2. Smt. Pinky Devi, wife of Shri Jagmindar Singh, aged about 26 years. Both residents of Pathhar Punji, Tehsil Berla, P.0. Patora, District Durg (CG) Versus State of Chhattisgarh through the Collector of Stamps, Durg. {Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India} Present: Mr. B.P. Sharma, counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Sushil Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the State/respondent. Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J ORDER (11-11-2011) 1. By this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the legality and propriety of the order dated 28.7.2009 passed by the Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur (Circuit Court at Raipur) in Revenue Appeal Case No.A/05/S.A./B-l 05/30/2009, whereby the Board of Revenue has affirmed the order dated 15-1-2009 passed by the Collector of Stamps, Durg, in Revenue Case No.66/B-105/2005-06 2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the order impugned and the order passed by the Collector of Stamps, Durg. 3. Learned counsel appearing for both the parties frankly admit and submit that this case is squarely covered by the decision ofthis Court passed in W.P. (Art. 227) No.285/2011 and other connected matters vide order dated 5.9.2011 and by passing the order dated 15-1-2009 the Collector of Stamps has not conducted inquiry for correct valuation of the property for the purpose of payment of stamp duty. 4. For the foregoing reasons, the writ petition is allowed. Order dated 28.7.2009 , passed by the Board of Revenue and order dated 15-1-2009 passed by the -Collector of Stamps, Durg are hereby quashed. The case is remitted to the Collector of Stamps for providing complete opportunity of hearing to the parties and to pass order afresh. Parties are directed to remain present before the Collector of Stamps, Durg on 15.12.2011. No order as to costs. Sd/- T.P. Sharma ,-Judge ^ llKaJ