IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21451 of 2011 Kumar Abhishek Tiwary, son of Sri Krishna Tiwary, resident of village – Hussepur, P S – Amnaur, District - Saran Versus 1. The Union of India through the Office of Inspector General of Police, Bihar Sector, Central Reserve Police Force, Patna (Bihar). 2. The Office of the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Muzaffarpur, Jhapaha (Bihar). 3. The Members of the Recruitment Board, Group Centre, Jhapaha, Muzaffarpur (Bihar). 02. 07.12.2011 After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the Union of India for the CRPF, looking at the vagueness of the assertions made in the writ application, the Court is not convinced that non-appointment of the petitioner was because of extraneous reasons as such. There are communications on record to show that the reason for non- selection or non-appointment of the petitioner on the post of a Constable (General Duty) was because of his merit position. To satisfy the conscience of the petitioner, let him file an application before the DIG, CRPF (respondent No.2) with regard to his merit position as well as the marks which he has got vis-à-vis the marks the last man so appointed got. In case such an application is filed, respondent No.2, the DIG, would be obliged to inform the petitioner of the said status within four weeks. Writ is disposed of with direction as above. rkp ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)