gw HIGH COURT OF CHHA'I‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 1657 of2002 PETITEONERS : 1. A.K.Roy,'Son ofR.P.Roy, aged about 47 years. 2. L.N.Naik, Son of R.K.Naik, aged about 46 years. 3. J.S.Rao, Son of K.S.N. Murty, aged about 53 years. 4. B.Babu Rao, Son of B.Bhima Rao, aged about 52 years. 5. S.R.Kha.nna. Son of S.N.Khatri. aged about 52 yeafS All Gumds S E Rallwav Bxlaspur (M £ 1 Now (Chhatnsgarh) ”f VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. Union of India. represented through General Manager, South Eastem Railway, Garden Reach. Calcutta v 43. 2. Divisionai Railway Manager, South Eastem Railway. Bilaspur (M.P.) Now (C.G.) 3. Senior Divisional Persomlel Oificer, South Eastem Railway, Bilaspur (M P )now (C.G.) 4. Senior Divisional Accounm Officer, South Eastern Railway, Bilaspur (M.P.) now (C.G.) 5. Senior Divisional Operating Manager, South Eastern Railway, Bilaspur (M.P.) now (C.G.) Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench, Caravas Building, South Civil Lines, Jabalpur (M.P.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22685227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Comm : l‘éon’ ble Shri Jagdish Bhalla, Acting Ciaiei’3ustice & Hon’ble Shz'i Satish K. Agnihotri J. C\ Present: Shri H.B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri P.Sam Koshv. Advocate for the respondent No. 1 to 5. ORAL ORDER ’Passed on 02 a day of ALNuui, W07) The following oral order of the Court was passed by Hon’ble Jagdish Bhalla, Acting C.J. Shri P. Sam Koshy, learned counsel for the respondents has very fairly indicated that the petitioners are only entitled to their salary fixed against their substantive post alongwith increment, and it has been indicated that increment has (2? also been added x0 the salary. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the proposition proposed by the learned counsel for the respondents is correct. However: their increment has not been added. In this circumstance, we direct the authorities concerned to make a scrutiny whether the increment has been given to the petitioners or not. lfnot, increment be provided on the pay-scale oftheir substantive post. With these observations with the concern of the parties, the writ petition Acting Chief Justice stands disposed of. /’/_//%,7y.. \ \R‘x Sdl— K Agnihom I 1‘ i i Sd/- t i Sansh ‘ ‘1 " it? Judge -_ .i A