1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3658 OF 2009 N. Geetanjali Parag Parelkar ..Petitioner V/s. Parag Subhash Parelkar ..Respondent Mr.Rahul R. Shah i/b.Mr.P.R.Arjunwadkar, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr.Utangale i/b.M/s.Utangale & Co., Advocate, for the respondent CORAM : R.M.SAVANT, J. DATE : 10TH JULY, 2009 P.C. . Mr.Rahul Shah, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the order impugned in the above Writ Petition has merged in the further order that has been passed by the learned District Judge, Thane. The further order has been impugned by the petitioner by way of Writ Petition No.4439 of 2009. The learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, fairly submits that on account of the said fact the above Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2 Mr.Uttangale, the learned counsel for the respondent, does not dispute the said position. The above Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous in view of the subsequent developments. ( R.M.SAVANT. J.)