IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY VPH CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 1387 OF 2008 Ramesh @ Pappu Annt Ghayalkar Petitioner (Through jail) Vs. The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr. P. S. Hingorani, APP, for the respondent. CORAM : BILAL NAZKI, & A. A. KUMBHKONI, JJ. DATE : JULY 21, 2008. PC :- 1. The petitioner moved an application for furlough leave which has been rejected, by the order dated 20th May, 2008, on the ground that in September 2007 when he had been granted concession, he overstayed for 188 days. The petitioner contends that because of his overstay of 188 days, remission of 376 days have been cut already, and as such, he could not be additionally deprived of further furlough leave. 2. Since the petitioner had overstayed in September 2007, we do not think that the respondents were wrong in rejecting his application for concession. However, if the petitioner files another application for concession afresh, that may be considered by the respondents, on its own merits. With these directions, petition is dismissed. Sd/- [ BILAL NAZKI, J.] Sd/- [ A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.]