IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 21369 of 2006 Between: 1 C.Lakshmaiah, s/o Peddaguravaiah, r/o Madirepalli Village, Duvvur Mandal, Kadapa District. 2 S.Nagaraju, s/o Obaiah, r/o Madirepalli Village, Duvvur Mandal, Kadapa District. 3 G.Jaya Ramudu, s/o Chinna Ramudu, r/o Madirepalli Village, Duvvur Mandal, Kadapa District. 4 B.Venkata Subba Reddy, s/o Venkata Reddy, r/o Madirepalli Village, Duvvur Mandal, Kadapa District. 5 J.Dasaradha Rami Reddy, s/o Konda Reddy, r/o Madirepalli Village, Duvvur Mandal, Kadapa District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The District Collector, kadapa. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Jammalamadugu, Kadapa District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Duvvur Mandal, Kadapa District. 4 Smt.A.Subbalakshamamma, w/o A.Dastagiri Reddy, r/o Madirepalli Village, Duvvur Mandal, kadapa District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CHALLASIVASANKAR Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES Counsel for Respondent No.4: ----- The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 to 3 in not taking action in spite of petitioners’ representation dated 29-09-2006, and consequently direct the respondents to act as per law and cancel the license of the 4th respondent and appoint permanent dealers in Duvvur Mandal, Kadapa District, as otherwise the petitioners’ village will suffer great hardship and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case”. At the hearing, Sri C.Siva Kankar, learned Counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration and therefore, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.27102 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 5th June, 2008 LUR