IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.14899 of 2010 1. RAM VILASH THAKUR S/O LATE DEOKI THAKUR R/O VILL.- DHARHARA, P.S.- DHARHARA, DISTT.- MONGHYR Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE COLLECTOR, MONGHYR 3. SRI PARASH NATH SINGH, THE THEN LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR MONGHYR SADAR, DISTT.- MONGHYR 4. LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR, SADAR MONGYR DISTT.- MONGYR 5. ANCHAL ADHIKARI, CIRCLE OFFICER DHARHARA, P.S. DHARHARA, DISTT.- MONGYR For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Deepak Kumar, A.C. to G.P.-I. 6 20.12.2010 The petitioner, who claims to be land less and belonging to extremely backward section of the society, has approached this Court challenging the order dated 14.8.2009 passed in Case No. 03/2008-09 by the respondent Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Sadar, Munger. It is the submission of the petitioner that he is land less and, therefore, he has constructed some dwelling structures on a piece of land measuring 7 decimals appertaining to Thana No. 267, Tauzi No. 445, Khata No. 272, plot No. 1039 within mauza Kasba. He raises a grievance with regard to order dated 14.8.2009 passed by respondent D.C.L.R. in Case No. 03/2008-09 whereby the claim of the petitioner for fixation of rent in respect of the said land was refused on the ground that in the Revenue records, the lands have been shown as Gair Mazarua land. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to show from any documents that the land claimed by him was/were settled with him under any provisions of the Act. In - 2 - fact, there is no pleading in the writ petition to that effect. In the order impugned itself, respondent D.C.L.R. has observed that if the petitioner is an eligible person under the provisions of the Act/Rule/Circular, appropriate proposal may be made for settlement of land in his favour. In view of the aforesaid observation made in the order itself and the fact that the petitioner has not been able to demonstrate before this Court his entitlement to the aforesaid piece of land, this Court is not inclined to exercise its extraordinary writ jurisdiction in his favour by issuing any appropriate Writ/orders. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this application enabling him to approach the appropriate authority for settlement of land in his favour. As prayed, the application is permitted to be withdrawn. pkj (Kishore K. Mandal, J)