1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.64 OF 2009 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.348 OF 2009 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.350 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders Mr.K.N.Lokhande, learned counsel for petitioners in all the petitions. Mr.I.G.Durani, learned counsel for respondent no.1 Mr.N.N.Jadhav, learned AGP for State (CORAM : A.V.POTDAR, J.) DATE : 6 th APRIL 2010 Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and learned AGP. On last occasion, it was brought to the notice of this Court that the contempt petitioners herein have filed writ petition no. 6222/2007, 6228/2007, and 6226/2007, in which they have challenged the orders passed in Appeal No.60/2006, 62/2006 and 61/2006. At the same time, when the entire order passed in those appeals are under challenge in the above referred writ petitions 2 before this Court, then there can not be a contempt of dis-obedience of the order, which is already subjudiced before the Single Bench of this Court. When this fact was brought to the notice of the counsel for petitioners, at that time, he sought accommodation to take proper instructions. Now the fact is clear that the order alleged to be contemptuous order is under challenge under these 3 writ petitions pending before the single bench of this Court. In view of this, leave to withdraw the present contempt petitions with liberty to approach the proper forum, for the proper relief. With this liberty, these contempt petitions are allowed to be withdrawn, and stands disposed of accordingly. (A.V.POTDAR, J.) khs/APRIL 2010/cp64-09