IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.912 of 2010 1. BIRENDRA YADAV 2. KRISHNA YADAV BOTH SONS OF LATE GUPTESHWAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 21/01/2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner No. 1 is the brother-in-law and petitioner No. 2 is the husband of the deceased and even though there is allegation in the First Information Report of the deceased having been done to death but later on, the Informant filed a compromise petition and so there is no likelihood of any conviction in the matter, let the petitioners above named, who are in custody since 26.10.2009 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxer, in connection with Dumraon P.S. Case No. 106 of 2009 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. (ii)That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the 2 police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. The learned Magistrate will immediately commit the case for trial and thereafter the trial court will expedite the trial in view of the fact that the Informant has compromised the matter. S.Ali (Anjana Prakash, J.)