IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 89 OF 2009 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.636 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra. ..Applicant. vs. Arvindkumar Dharmchand Jain & Anr.Respondents. Mr A.S. Shinde, A.P.P.for the State. None for the Respondents. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: A.R. JOSHI,J. A.R. JOSHI,J. A.R. JOSHI,J. DATED : 24TH APRIL,2009. DATED : 24TH APRIL,2009. DATED : 24TH APRIL,2009. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- ----- 1. Heard learned A.P.P. for the State on the application for delay condonation. 2. There is delay of 28 days in filing the application for leave to file appeal against the acquittal of respondent nos.1 and 2 in the matter of offences punishable under Sections 7 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. 3. It appears that initially a case was lodged by one police officer, who detained the truck of the respondents on suspicion and when allegedly the respondents tried to bribe him, police officer made complaint to the Anti Corruption Bureau. 4. None for the respondents though they are reportedly served and represented by Advocate. Delay caused in preferring leave application is 28 days and it was due to getting Government resolution passed after scrutiny of the documents in the Government office. 5. Considering the matter, in the opinion of this Court, said delay is required to be condoned and accordingly delay condonation application bearing No. 89 of 2009 is allowed and disposed of accordigly. 6. Criminal application No. 636 of 2009 to appear on board on 12th June, 2009. (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.R.JOSHI,J.) (A.R.JOSHI,J.)