HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI W.P.No.5978 of 2011 ORDER: In view of the fact that the contract period expired by 17.05.2011, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. However, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has deposited huge amounts by way of cash, security deposit and also bank guarantee at the time of entering into contract and, therefore, he is entitled for refund of the said amounts. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to make a representation before the respondents seeking refund of the said amounts and on such representation being filed, the respondents may consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon. No order as to costs. ______________________ JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI 16-06-2011 Gsn.