1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APLICATION NO. 270 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APLICATION NO. 270 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APLICATION NO. 270 OF 2006 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 507 OF 2006 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 507 OF 2006 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 507 OF 2006 Kamalakshan Kaimal. .. Applicant. vs. Sarala Kamalakshan Kaimal. .. Respondent. Mr. M.S. Raje i/by Pranali Kakade for Applicant. Mr. K.V. Sasthe, APP for the State. Coram: J.N. PATEL &, Coram: J.N. PATEL &, Coram: J.N. PATEL &, A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. A.A. SAYED, JJ. Date: 7TH JUNE, 2007. Date: 7TH JUNE, 2007. Date: 7TH JUNE, 2007. P.C. . The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the matter is amicably settled and, therefore, he does not want to prosecute the revision application. The revision application is dismissed as settled. No order as to costs. 2. In view of the dismissal of the revision application, criminal application does not survive. The same also stands dismissed as infructuous. (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) (J.N. Patel, J. ) 2 (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. ) (A.A. Sayed, J. )