FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10986 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 1 Mr. S.S. Thombare, Advocate for the petitioner Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondents. CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI & R.M. BORDE, JJ. DATE :- 13th December, 2010. PER COURT :- 1] The petitioner challenges the meeting which was scheduled to be held on 8th December, 2010 for considering the No Confidence Motion against the petitioner. The only ground on which the petitioner challenges the said meeting is that, the proposal for considering the no confidence motion was submitted to the Deputy Collector and not the Collector and as such, the entire proceeding stands vitiated. 2] In view of the law laid down by the Apex Court, in the matter of “K. Narasimhiah Vs. H.C. Singri Gowda and others” reported in AIR 1966 SC 330, no prejudice is caused to the petitioner merely because the proposal is submitted to the Deputy Collector and not the Collector. In any case, the no confidence motion is passed by a requisite majority. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to exercise the extraordinary jurisdiction to interfere in the democratic matters. Writ petition is summarily rejected. [R.M. BORDE, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] grt/- FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10986 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's Orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. 2