IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CR No. 3157 of 2008 Date of decision March 24, 2009 Amrit Pal Singh ....... Petitioner Versus Santokh Singh and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. L. N. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mandeep S Bedi, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? K. Kannan, J (oral). Learned counsel for the respondent states that he has no objection to the revision petition being allowed and the order of the Court below being set aside. It is reported that the parties have entered into a compromise that would be possible if transposition will take place. It is contended that setting aside the order passed by the Court below has become necessary to effectuate the compromise. As ordered. The Civil revision petition is allowed. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE March 24, 2009 archana