IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP(T) No.1827 of 2008. Date of decision:31.3.2010 Joginder Kaur ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & ors. ….Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr.Justice R.B.Misra, Judge. For the Petitioner: Mr.Vikas Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. AG with Mr.J.K.Verma, Dy.A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J.(Oral) Writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- (i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to place the applicant at appropriate place in the seniority list (Annexure A-3) of JBT’s by counting the ad-hoc service rendered by the applicant w.e.f. 14.2.1986 for all purposes; (ii) That the respondents may further be directed to provide all consequential benefits to the applicant on the basis of such seniority like proficiency step up, promotions and arrears of pay etc.” According to the petitioner, several persons, similarly situated, have been granted the benefit. Some of the names are referred to in Paragraph-(ix) of the writ petition. Petitioner may point out her grievances before the 1st respondent. It is seen that the petitioner has submitted Annexure A-2 representation before the 4th respondent. It is for the 1st respondent to consider the matter. In case the petitioner files fresh representation within one month from today before the 1st respondent thereby pointing out the similar cases wherein the benefit has been granted, the matter be duly examined by the 1st respondent without discriminating the petitioner and appropriate action, in accordance with law, will be taken within another three months. Petition stands disposed of. Copy dasti. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice March 31, 2010(s/sl) ( Justice R.B. Misra ), Judge