IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2011 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 2266 of 2011() ----------------------------- LP.9/2005 of ADDL. DISTRICT COURT(ADHOC 2), THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED:- ---------------------------- SURENDRAN, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. KRISHNAN, ANJILIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KALLETTUMKARA VADAKKU MURI DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN SRI.NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT:- ------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE EXCISE INSPECTOR, EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, IRINJALAKKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM ADV. SRI. M.S. BREEZE, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: V. RAMKUMAR, J. ============================ Bail Application No.2266 of 2011 ============================ Dated this the 18 th day of March, 2011. ORDER Petitioner, who is the second accused in L.P.No.9 of 2005 on the file of Addl. Sessions Court, Fast Track-II, Thrissur, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Admittedly non-bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Court below and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the court below and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably, on the same date on which it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner. This Bail Application is, accordingly, disposed of. V. RAMKUMAR,JUDGE. rv .