1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVI L REVISION APPLICATION NO.306 OF 2009 Smt. Pramilaben Manchharam Chasia & Anr. .....Applicants Versus Pravinchandra Manchharam Chasia & Ors. .....Respondents Mr. P. G. Lad, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. H. M. Pandya, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr. C. B. Shirke for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5. CORAM : R. V. MORE, J. DATED : 13th JULY, 2009. P.C.: Mr. Lad, learned Counsel for the Applicants, submitted that there are no directions about discharge of the Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay in the impugned order and that is the only objection, he has. Mr. Pandya, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1 and Mr. Shirke, learned Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5, have no objection if the Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay is discharged. In view of the statement of the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties, the Court Receiver, High Court,Bombay is discharged. Impugned Order stands modified to that extent only. It is made clear that rest of the order remains unchanged. Sd/- (R. V. MORE, J.)