..(1).. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.682 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.564 OF 2008 Sunanda @ Bebi Uttam Sonawale. ..Applicant. Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, & 2. Smt.Vithabai Kamble. ..Respondents. .... Mr.S.V.Kotwal, Adv. for the Applicant. Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for the State. .... CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. DATED : 27th June, 2008. DATED : 27th June, 2008. DATED : 27th June, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant-orig.accused No.3 and the learned APP for the State. 2. The applicant-orig. accused No.3 has been convicted under Section 498-A IPC and sentenced to RI for six months. The applicant is now seeking bail. 3. The applicant is a lady. The learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant was on bail during the trial and she has ..(2).. not misused the liberty granted to her. This statement has not been controverted by the prosecution. The learned Counsel for the applicant has further stated that the maximum sentence imposed upon the applicant is for six months and the appeal is not likely to be heard within the said time. Moreover he has submitted that applicant has a good case on merit. 4. Looking to the above facts and the evidence on record, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 5. The applicant - Sunanda @ Bebi Uttam Sonawale be released on bail in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rs.Fifteen Thousand Only) with one or two sureties to make up the said amount. 6. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)