Civil Revision No.49 of 2010 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.49 of 2010 Date of decision : 8.1.2010 M/s Pardeep Timber and another ....Petitioners Versus Punjab & Sind Bank and others ...Respondents **** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND Present: Mr. R.S.Mamli, Advocate for the petitioners. S. D. ANAND, J. The petitioner-judgment debtor filed an objection petition to resist the execution of the impugned decree by raising a plea that the amount claimed had been exaggerated on an imaginary foundation, that the correct statement of accounts had not been presented at the trial and that the interest claim raised by respondent-decree holder and allowed by the learned Trial Court excessive in character. It was the grievance of the petitioner- judgment debtor that the respondent-decree holder had to recover the amount which was far short of the market value of the attached property which the petitioner quantified at rupees more than one crore. The plea raised thereby was that the respondent-decree holder ought to have filed list of other properties owned by the objector from out of which the impugned decree could be satisfied. The objections were negatived by the learned Trial Judge Civil Revision No.49 of 2010 -2- **** by observing that the Executing Court was duty bound to execute the impugned decree on As Is Where Is Basis, particularly when the objections are vague and ambiguous in character. I called upon the learned counsel for the petitioner to argue in favour of maintainability of the petition to the extent it pertains to the above indicated objections. The posed query drew a blank. Even otherwise, it is plainly illogical for the petitioner-judgment debtor/objector to resist the impugned decree on the basis that the decree under execution was based upon exaggerated claim or it awarded excessive rate of interest. The objections of that category could be taken only in appeal. Such like objections are not maintainable in the course of the execution proceedings of a valid decree. The petition shall stand dismissed in limine. Order dasti on payment of usual charges. January 08,2010 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE