WP(C) 3850/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HN SARMA Heard Mr. MN Islam, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mrs VL Sinha, learne d Govt. counsel appearing for the official respondents. Challenging the impugned order issued by the Officer-in-Charge Amchang Wildlife Sanctuary, Bunda, the petitioners have approached this court by filin g this writ petition. The aforesaid order is quoted hereinbelow: To Respected Gaon Burah/Village Head Mazargaon Area Yusuf Nagar Village. Sub: Regarding the disturbing habitation of wild life. This is to inform you that the Yusuf Nagar, Mazargaon village inhabited by you is situated in Amchang Wildlife Sanctuary within the habitation of wild l ife for which the area of habitation of wildlife has been affected and problems have been created for cvonservation of the same. For the interest of conservatio n of wildlife, you are required to vacate this land. If you have any objection regarding the same, you are requested to infor m Forest Rights Committee and submit your representation, if any, through the sa me to the Sub-Divisional Level Committee at any early date. The contention of the petitioners are that the land occupied by them do not fall within this Sanctuary, on the other hand it falls within the jurisdicti on of the revenue authority. However, the learned counsel submits that the land is a Govt. land. From the averments made in this writ petition as well as from the statem ents made by the learned counsel for the petitioners it is found that the land in question is a Govt. land either it falls within the Amchang Wildlife Sanctua ry are or within the revenue department. Status of the land being a Govt. land, the petitioners do not have any right to possess the land unless the they are settlement holders or land holders or other than the land holders as defined in the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation. Perusal of the impugned notice shows th at the petitioners have been given opportunity by the respondents authorities to the effect that in the event they have any objection/grievance with regard to t he possession of the said land to approach and raise objection before the For est Rights Committee by submitting their representation. In view of the aforesai d liberty already given by the authority in their notice, the petitioners may exercise the same upon filing such objection, if any, the authority shall consid er and dispose of the same in accordance with law. With this order, this writ petition stands finally disposed of. Earlier interim order is merged with this order.