IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE &T EILAS?UR (CHH%TTE$G§RH) OF 2001 W.P.No. 5Q \ Punit:Ram Sahu aged 60 (Sixty) yearq/s/o Sakharam $ahu, ocg§§ation Cultivator: Z. Shydmlal Sahu aged 7O (Seventy) yaars s/o Kapilnathxsghuf Rohani Bai Sahu aged 64'(§ixty '£our} years wd/e Sakharam Sahu CultiVator; 4. Chan&ul&l Sahu aae§ 65 (Sixty £ive) years 5/0 Kunjal $ahu, Cultivator; £11 resident with registered addre$s at Village Bharuwadih, Revenue Circle Sandi, Tah5il : Pallari, wistrict Raipur (Chhattisgarh). E$TITICNERS Gram Panchayat Malyuri thraugh Sanpanch (comnrising the village Bharuwadik under Gram Panchayat). 2. Raj Kumar Sahu aged 35 (Thixty— five) years, resident o£ village aharuwadih, Tah$i1 Pall§ri, Digtrict Raipur; Sub Divisional Officer (Eevanue) Baloéa Bazar, District Raipur; 4. Aé&iti¢na1 Tahsildar, Fallari in the Suh-Divisian Balodabazax District Raipur; 5. &daitiona1 Collector. Balo§an Bazar, District Raipur} 6. The State o£ Chhattisgarh through the &evenue Department Raipur (Chhattisgarh) REspoND§§Ts “my Conta..,2 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION No. 52 of 2001 PETITIONERS : Punit Ram Sahu & Other VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Gram Panchayat Malpuri & Others. PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ; k; SB: Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihot§.i‘,"j. Present: Shri J.R.Verma, Advocate for the petitidners. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer for the State. ORDER (ORAL) (Passed on 01“ day of December, 2010) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to appropriate forum that may be available to the petitioners under the provisions of law. 2. Learned counsel appearing for other side has no objection. It is ordered accordingly. 4. Consequently, the writ petitions is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty, if so advised. “ni sdl- ‘ Satish K. Agnihotr’L, .g Judge r! s. g