IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.O.C.P. No.1740 of 2006 Date of Decision:- 14.12.2006 Jaskirat Singh ....Petitioner(s) through Mr.Rakesh Garg, Advocate vs. B.R.Bajaj & another ....Respondent(s) through *** CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. *** SURYA KANT, J. This contempt petition has been filed, inter alia, alleging that despite the order dated September 29, 2006 passed by this Court in C.W.P.No.15821 of 2006 in terms whereof the writ petition of the petitioner was to be treated as a representation and disposed of within two weeks, no such decision has been taken by the respondents despite the subsequent reminders dated 26.10.2006 and 20.11.2006 (Annexures P-4 and P-5). It is also stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that in deference to the above-mentioned order dated September 29, 2006, a copy of the writ petition along with the said order has been handed over by him to both the respondents. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and having regard to the clear directions contained in the order dated September 29, 2006 and in order to give one more opportunity to the respondents to comply with the same, this petition is disposed of with a direction to (i) Mr.B.R.Bajaj, IAS, Principal Secretary to Government of Punjab, Local Self C.O.C.P. No.1740 of 2006 -2- Government (ii) Dr.Jaswant Singh, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Patiala to personally look into the petitioner's claim as contained in his writ petition and then dispose of the same by passing a reasoned order within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this Order. A copy of the speaking order shall be communicated to the petitioner also. A copy of this order be given Dasti to learned cousnel for the petitioners on payment of usual charges . December 14, 2006 ( SURYA KANT ) poonam JUDGE