( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1136 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1136 OF 2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1136 OF 2007 IN IN IN APPEAL NO.204 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.204 OF 2007 APPEAL NO.204 OF 2007 IN IN IN SUIT NO.2613 OF 1984 SUIT NO.2613 OF 1984 SUIT NO.2613 OF 1984 The Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co.Ltd. .. Appellants V/s M/s.Haldyn Glass Works Pvt.Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.A.B.Ketkar with Mr.D.Dhanure i/by M/s.M.V.Kini & Co. for the Appellants. Mr.Vivek Vashi i/by M/s.Amarchand Mangaldas for Respondents. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP V.MOHTA, JJ. DATE : 13th December, 2007. DATE : 13th December, 2007. DATE : 13th December, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the partries. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellants are seeking condonation of 104 days delay caused in filing the Appeal. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellants. Hence the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)