-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 646 OF 2008 Shivram Rajaram Malunjkar & Anr. .. Petitioners. V/s. The Collector, Nashik & Ors. .. Respondents. --- WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 658 OF 2008 Shivram Rajaram Malunjkar .. Petitioner. Vs. The Collector, Nashik and Ors. .. Respondents. ---- WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 659 OF 2008 Raosaheb R. Malunjkar & Ors. .. Petitioners. V/s. The Collector, Nashik & Ors. .. Respondents. --- WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 671 OF 2008 Somnath K. Malunjkar .. Petitioner. Vs. The Collector, Nashik and Ors. .. Respondents. ---- WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 672 OF 2008 Shivram Rajaram Malunjkar .. Petitioner. Vs. -: 2 :- The Collector, Nashik and Ors. .. Respondents. ---- WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 679 OF 2008 Anil R. Malunjkar & Ors. .. Petitioner. V/s. The Collector, Nashik & Ors. .. Respondents. --- WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 681 OF 2008 Raosaheb R. Malunjkar .. Petitioner. Vs. The Collector, Nashik and Ors. .. Respondents. ---- WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 684 OF 2008 Raosaheb R. Malunjkar & Anr. .. Petitioners. V/s. The Collector, Nashik & Ors. .. Respondents. ---- Mr. S.S. Kulkarni for the Petitioners. Mr. V.S.Masurkar, GP for the Respondents. ----- CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. N.D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : 03RD JUNE, 2008. DATED : 03RD JUNE, 2008. DATED : 03RD JUNE, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . We have heard the learned counsel for both the -: 3 :- sides in all the above petitions. Two questions are raised in the above petitions. One is about supply of valuation of the property. Insofar as that aspect is concerned, in the affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent Nos. 4 and 5, it is made clear that the valuation chart is open to everybody to see and that valuation is not to be supplied by the Registrar. Sofaras the second question about refusal of the Registrar to register the document is concerned, the learned Government Pleader submits that if the petitioners want their conveyance/documents to be registered they can lodge it with the Registrar. The Registrar will accept the documents for registration and communicate to the petitioners any objections that the Registrar may have to the registration of the documents. On the objections being pointed out, it is for the petitioners to submit before the Registrar that either the objections are not valid or that the objections have been removed. 2. In our opinion, in view of this submission made by the learned government pleader, it is not necessary to entertain these petitions. In case the petitioners want the documents to be registered they can lodge them with the Registrar and on the Registrar communicating objections, the petitioners can take steps in accordance -: 4 :- with law. In that regard, all contentions that may be available to the petitioners may be raised either before the Registrar or before the appropriate forum, are kept open. In case the Registrar refuses to register the documents, he shall record his reasons and communicate them to the petitioners. 3. In this view of the matter, all the petitions are hereby disposed off. Order accordingly. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (N.D.DESHPANDE,J.) .....