IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25189 of 2009 KARU SINGH, S/O LATE BHUTAL SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-GAJARA CHATAR, P.S.-NARHAT, DISTRICT-NAWADA. ……………PETITIONER. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ……………OPP. PARTY. ----------- 2 15.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Case is under Sections 341, 323, 447, 307, 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. From the order of learned Sessions Judge, it appears that the Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of the petitioner under the impression that petitioner had assaulted the injured by SAIF. Learned counsel for the petitioner has read the photocopy of the FIR to show that the learned Sessions Judge has committed error of record. He submits that all the three accused including petitioner have been said to have assaulted the injured by lathi. The two other accused have been allowed bail by learned Sessions Judge on the ground that the allegation against them is of having assaulted the injured by lathi. Petitioner is in custody since 16.6.2009 and he has no criminal - 2 - antecedent. Considering the identical allegation made in the FIR against all the three accused persons of having assaulted the injured by lathi out of whom two have been allowed bail by learned Sessions Judge, this application is allowed. Petitioner, namely, Karu Singh is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawadah in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 19 of 2009. Arvind/ (J. N. Singh, J.)