IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15612 of 2011 Smt.Saroj Singh, wife of Prof. Maheshwar Singh, resident of G. Mukherjee Road, Naya Tola, Bikhanpur, Police Station-Kotwali, District- Bhagalpur ------------------------------ Petitioner Versus 1. The T.M.Bhagalpur University ,Bhagalpur, through its Registrar 2. The Vice-Chancellor, T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur 3. The Registrar, T.M.Bhagalpur, Bhagalpur 4. The Finance Officer, T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur ----------------------------- Respondents. ---------------------------------- 02 13-09-2011 Heard Sri Subhash Chandra Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anil Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent/ Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 31.01.2010 as Lecturer from Sabour College, Sabour under Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, has prayed for directing the Respondents to clear his retiral dues . The claim of the petitioner has been mentioned in paragraph-14 of the writ petition, which are as follows: (i) Pension since 1.2.2010 (ii) Gratuity Rs.10 Lakhs (iii) Leave Encashment (iv) Group Insurance (v) Welfare Fund (vi) Undeposited P.F. (vii) Deferred D.A. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that number of representations have also been filed by the petitioner before the authority concerned regarding his claim made in the writ petition, but till date no decision has been taken. In view of the facts and circumstances, the Court is of the 2 opinion that the writ petition can be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation regarding his claim made in the present writ petition before the Respondent no.2/ Vice- Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Respondent no.2/ Vice-Chancellor, T.M.Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioner, the Respondent no.2 is required to examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. If Respondent no.2 considers the claim of the petitioner as genuine, he is required to pass order for payment within the aforesaid time. Even in case of refusal, the Respondent no.2 is required to pass speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within three months from the date of filing of such representation. With the above observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. NKS/- ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)