IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH JUNE 2010 / 9TH ASHADHA 1932 WP(C).No. 28730 of 2009(I) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- AZHAKATH VALAPPIL ABDULLA, S/O.ABDURAHIMAN, KALACHAL, P.O.ALANCODE, EDAPPAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. EDAPPAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PO.EDAPPAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, EDAPPAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PO.EDAPPAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. POKKARATH VALAPPIL RAVI @ RAVEENDRAN, S/O.KARUNAKARAN NAIR, P.O.EDAPPAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. R1 & R2 BY ADVS. SRI.LUIZ GODWIN D'COUTH, S.C, SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR (PANAMPALLI NAGAR), SRI.K.P.CHANDRASEKHAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/06/2010,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). NO.28730/2009-I: APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO. 3540/2006 OF SRO EDAPPAL, DTD. 30/10/2000. EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE EDAPPAL VILLAGE OFFICER, DTD. 10/06/2008. EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE BUILDING TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT PANCHAYATH, DTD. 06/08/2009. EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.2. DTD. 05/10/2009. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE. Prv. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C). No.28730/2009-I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 30th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T This writ petition is filed alleging that a bunk has been placed by the third respondent on the side of a P.W.D. road before the petitioner's building, which is a commercial building abutting to the public road. The said allegation has been denied by the Panchayat in the counter affidavit filed by the Secretary. It is pointed out that there is no bunk placed in front of the petitioner's building. The learned counsel for the Panchayat submitted that only a moving cart is placed by the third respondent to eke out his living by selling fruits. In that view of the matter, as on today, there is nothing for the Panchayat to take action on the complaint filed by the petitioner. If the petitioner has any further complaints in matter, it is open to him to approach appropriate authorities for necessary action. Without prejudice to the said remedy, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms