IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 9555 of 2005 Between: Chikkala Satyanarayana S/o.Chikkala Somaiah Bhadrachalam Mandal Khammam District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector (Panchayat Wing) Khammam 2 The District Panchayat Officer Khammam 3 The Divisional Panchayat Officer Bhadrachalam Khammam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ,order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in keeping the petitioner under the suspension beyond 6 months period from the date of initial orders suspension dated 14-10-2004 as contrary to sub- section(6) of section 249 of A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and also keeping the petitioner under suspension by the impugned orders passed by the first respondent in R.P.No.LT-535(DB) and consequently to declare that the petitioner is entitled to continue as Sarpanch of Yetapaka Grampanchayat, P6/799/2003, dt.14-10-2004 are arbitrary,illegal and in contravention of the principles of natural justice and also contrary to the law laid down by this Hon. court which is reported in 1990 (3) ALT-355 (DB) and 1999 (5) A LT-535 (DB) and consequently to declare tht the petitiner is entitled to continue as Sarpanch of Yetapaka Grampanchayat, Bhadrachalam Mandal of Khammam District, without there being any break and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.V.RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV. The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI W.P.NO.9555 of 2005 ORDER It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication on merits. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _____________ G.ROHINI,J 19th December,2008 *TSNR