2012cao1326.11 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CAO NO. 1326/2011 IN M.C.A. NO. 457/2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4281 OF 2010 (Sukanya Ashok Pawar vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & P.D. KODE, JJ. DECEMBER 20, 2011. Shri Kukday, learned counsel for the applicant/ petitioner states that the copy of order passed by the Scrutiny Committee is received by the applicant. He, however, states that he has no further instructions about the steps to be taken. Shri Sonak, learned AGP for respondents No. 1 & 3, Shri Patil, learned counsel for respondent No. 2, and Shri Deshpande, learned counsel for respondent No. 4 – University, point out that Respondent No. 2 – Scrutiny Committee has invalidated the caste claim of the petitioner and hence present application is rendered infructuous. With liberty to the applicant to take necessary steps as are open to her in law, present application is disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.