1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION 2398 of 2009 (Shri Uttam Vs. Mahadeo) -------------------------------------------------- Office notes, office Memoranda of Court’s or Coram,appearances, Court’s orders Judge’s or directions and Registrar’s orders Orders Mr. V.H.Solanke, Adv., h/f Mr. M.D.Gitte, Adv., for the applicant. Mr. D.R.Korde, APP, for respondent/State/R-5./ Mr. Sachin J.Salgare, Adv., respondent nos. 1 to 4 ... CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE: 18/9/2009 P.C.:- 1. Heard. 2. There is delay of 341 days in causing to file revision application against the order of acquittal. The applicant herein feels aggrieved as State did not diligently prosecute the matter. Delay being properly explained, it is condoned. Application allowed. (K.U.CHANDIWAL) JUDGE ... agp/2398-09crapl