IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.106 of 2011 Ugra Chandra Jha Versus The Lalit Narayan Mithila University & Ors. ---------------------------------- 2. 14.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the University as also the State. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the University stating therein that the admissible dues of the petitioner has been paid, as detailed in the show cause. However, with regard to the arrears of salary, it is stated that for want of fund, it is not possible to pay the same, however, it will be paid no sooner the fund is released by the State Government against that head. Mr Kripa Nath Jha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that although the aforesaid payment on account of gratuity and leave encashment has been made, but the calculation as stated in the show cause is not correct since the length of service of the petitioner as well as the last pay drawn by him was not correctly calculated. Considering the show cause and the submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to proceed further in the matter. The contempt application stands disposed of. However, it is submitted by Mr Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner that the discrepancy in calculating the length of service as well as the last pay drawn shall be brought to the notice of the Registrar of the University for consideration and payment. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)