1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR L. P. A. NO. 357 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1358 OF 2011 C. Padmavati Naidu & 3 Others Vs. Friends Coop. Housing Society thr Secretary & Others ........................................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................................ Shri Gadhia Adv for petitioner. Shri Patrikar Adv for respondent 1. Shri Ahirkar AGP for respondent 3. CORAM: B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & P. D. KODE JJ. DATED: 15th NOVEMBER, 2011. Heard Shri Gadhia learned counsel for appellant/original petitioner, Shri Patrikar learned counsel for respondent no.1/original respondent and Shri Ahirkar learned AGP for respondent no.3. Challenge in present L. P. A. is to order dated 28.03.2011 passed by learned Single Judge dismissing appellants Writ Petition No. 1358 of 2011. Challenge in Writ Petition by them was to order dated 07.01.2011 passed below Ex. 42 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 307 of 1999 seeking leave to amend the Written 2 Statement. Shri Patrikar learned counsel a the threshold pointed out that on 05.10.2011 the appeal itself has been dismissed on merits by reasoned judgment of appellate Court. It is, therefore, obvious that challenge in present L. P. A. is rendered infructuous. However in the interest of justice we permit appellant leave to challenge the order rejecting their application for amendment (Ex. 42) before the appellate Court if they are so advised. With this leave we dispose of the L. P. A. as infructuous. JUDGE JUDGE svk