... 1 ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3092 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3092 OF 2004 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3092 OF 2004 IN IN IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.21489 OF 2004 FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.21489 OF 2004 FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.21489 OF 2004 ........................................................... OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF CORAM, APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS ........................................................... Shri Shrirang Rustomji with Mohana Nair i/by Mohana Nair and Associates for the Applicants. Ms Nisha Dabhade for B.M.C. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : JANUARY 12, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 12, 2007. DATE : JANUARY 12, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Ms Neeta Dabhade appears for the Respondents. The Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are the officers of the Respondent No.1. Therefore, the conditional order passed on 07th June, 2006 as against the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 is set aside and the Application is restored as against the Respondent Nos.2 and 3. Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay of 27 days. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). ... 2 ... JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE