IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.2671 of 2008 SUNITA KUMARI, WIFE OF SRI SHIV SHANKAR PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE WARDAHA, P.S. SIRDALA, DISTRICT NAWADA --- PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2. THE DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, VIKASH BHAWAN, PATNA. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NAWADA. 4. THE DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, NAWADA. 5. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, SIRDALA, DISTRICT NAWADA. 6. THE MUKHIYA, SANDH MANGHAWAN PANCHAYAT, SIRDALA BLOCK, DISTRICT NAWADA. 7. BABY KUMARA, WIFE OF SRI SURRENDER PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE WARDAHA, P.S. SIRDALA, DISTRICT NAWADA. --- RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2 30.3.2011 The petitioner has filed this writ application on the ground that respondent no. 7 has wrongly been chosen for the post of Anganwari Sevika in the centre Wardaha North. There are two contentions on behalf of the petitioner. Firstly, it is stated that respondent no. 7 has been selected for Anganwari Kendra Wardaha North, whereas respondent no. 7 is a resident of Wardaha South. It is also alleged that respondent no. 7 produced forged and fabricated certificates of matriculation wherein it seems that she had passed in the 1st Division but in the cross list she has shown to have passed in the 2nd Division. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Chief Development Project Officer, Sirdala in which it has been stated that the respondent no. 7 lives in the mapping area which comes under the Wardaha North. It is further stated that the respondent no. 7 had better marks and she was chosen in the ‘Aam Sabha’ held on 29.5.2007. 2 If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the Mukhiya in appointing respondent no. 7 on the ground that her matric certificate is forged, it would be open for her to file an application before the District Magistrate, Nawada. If any such application is filed before the District Magistrate, Nawada, he/she will hold an enquiry by calling for a report from the Bihar School Examination Board and thereafter determine the question which has been raised in this case. If it is found that the respondent no. 7 has produced forged and fabricated documents, she may be noticed, and thereafter appropriate orders may be passed by the District Magistrate, Nawada. This writ application is thus, disposed of. Sanjay ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)