HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR APPLICANT CR.M.P.217/2008 Smt. Nilam Baghel, Wd/o. Late Harish Baghel, aged about 33 yeai's, Occnpation Teacher, r/o. Village Hirmi, Potice Station Suhela, Tahsil Simga, Distt Raipur (CG) Versus NON-APPLICANTS B^ 2. 4. 6. State of Chhattisgarh, through : Distt. Magisti'ate Raipiir, PoMce Station:Suhela, Distt. Raipur (CG) Smt. Krishna Baghe.l,W/o. Bhagt Sio.gh Baghel, aged about 57 years Bhagat Singh Baghel, S/o, Late Taa Singh Baghel, aged about 32 years Maaoj Baghel, S/o. Bhagat Siagh Baghel, aged about 32 yeai's Shekhar Baghel, S/o, Bhagat Siagh Baghel, aged about 34 years Snit. Seeina Baghel, W/o. Maaoj Baghel, aged about 24 years Respondent No. 2 to 6 r/o. Hiani, PoUce Station Suhela, Talisil Simga, Distt.Raipur(CG) Present Address; vitlage:Kareli, Thana Newra, Tahsil Simga, distt. Raipzir (CG) APPLICATION UNDBR SECTION 482 OF THE CR.P.C. (SB :Hosi?ble Mt. T.P.Shatma^ J.) Preseut: Shri Jitendra Gupta, Advocate wifh Shri N.K.Chatterjee, counsel for tlie appUcaat. Shn Vr&od Tekain, Paiiel lawyer for the State/respondent No,4, ORAL ORDER (Pctssed on 8th Mesy 2008) This petition is clirccted for quashBient of fhe appeal filed on behalf of the applicaat m Cr. Appeal No, 01/2008 on fhe groiind of niain.tahiabUity. f.;- 2. Heard counsel for the parties, Order iinpugned perused. 3. It is argued oa behalf of fhe applicaat th.at no appeal is niaintaio.able agaiast the order passed by the JuclicialMagistrate First Class, Baloda Bazar in. relation wifh fhe case under the Protection of Wonien froin Doniestic Violence Act, 2005. Therefore, fhe. appeal ffled aad pendm.g before tiie Second Additional Sessions Judge, Baloda BQZQT is not coBipetent. 4. Accordiiig to fhe copy ofimpugned order sheet, it appears fhat fhe appeal has been preferred by the non-applicao.t No.2 under Section 29 of the Protection ofWomen from Doniestic Violence Act, 2005. An objection relatiag to tenability is filed on behalfoffhe applicaB.t Same is pending for consideration. The ofher respondent has not been sen/red wifh a notice, Trial Court ha neither rejected the appMcatiou ofthe applicaat nor ardved at a fiadio.g th.at the appeal is tenable. VirtuaUy tdal Court has not passed any order, s/- 5, Thiis, ia absence ofaay fiiidio.g, the present petition is pre-Biature, Hence, the petition beiag devoid ofinerits is Mable to be disaiissed aad is hereby disaiissed, T.P. Sharma Judge