IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1886 of 2010 GANGESH YADAV, Son of Indra Narayan Yadav, R/o Belsandi, P.S. Bithan, District Samastipur ………. Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ……. Opposite Party ----------- For the petitioner : Mr. Suraj Nr. Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ---------- 4 31.03.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 394/302 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier the petitioner’s prayer for bail had been rejected vide order dated 5.10.2009 as contained in Annexure 1. It is submitted that the petitioner did not resort to firing, rather he was driving the motorcycle, which has been supported by the informant in his examination. Perused the report of the learned Additional Sessions Judge concerned. It has been stated therein that 11 witnesses have already been examined and 6 more witnesses are to be examined. 2 In that view of the matter since there is direct allegation against the petitioner for committing road robbery in which a person had died, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner. However, the trial court concerned is directed to take every step for expeditious disposal of the trial concerned, preferably, within six months from today. The petitioner, if so advised, would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail if the trial is not concluded within six months as aforesaid. Spd/- (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)