IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2010 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 188 of 2010(S) ------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.23851/2008 Dated 22/08/2008 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER IN THE W.P.(C) ---------------------------------------- REJI, S/O.KUTTAPPAN, AGED 25 YEARS, REJI BHAVAN, THANNIPOIKA, CHITTAZHA, VATTAPPARA.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.TRIPTEN RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. P.V.JAYAKRISHNAN, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE MEMBER SECRETARY, CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE, GATE NO.31, C.G.P.COMPLEX, NEW DELHI-110 003. 2. PRADEEP KUMAR.T, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, FOREST HEAD OFFICE, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. C.BALACHANDRAN, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, VANALAKSHMI, IST FLOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.T.T.MAHAMOOD THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/03/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== Contempt Case (C).No. 188 of 2010 ================== Dated this the 26th day of March, 2010 J U D G M E N T The learned Government Pleader has, on 15.3.2010, produced before me a fax copy of an order passed pursuant to Annexure 1 judgment. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that full benefits due to the petitioner have not been granted. By Annexure 1 judgment, I only directed disposal of Ext.P6. In disposal of Ext.P6, an order has been passed. If the petitioner is aggrieved by that order, his remedy lies in challenging the same appropriately. Therefore, without prejudice that right, this contempt case is closed. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge