IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.68 of 2011 BIDAN YADAV @ BIDYANAND YADAV SON OF YOGO YADAV @ HUGESHWAR YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHANAN, POLICE STATION SALKHUA, DISTRICT- SAHARSA Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE Chief Secretaryt, Bihar, Patna 2. The Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Inspector General of Prison, Government of Bihar, Patna 4. The Jail Superintendent, Saharsa 5. The District Magistrate, Saharsa ----------- 2 07.02.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The grievance of the petitioner is that upon his conviction for the offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code which was affirmed by this Court in Criminal Appeal No. 367 of 1995 and analogous appeal vide Annexure-1 to the writ application even though he has completed 17 years of his sentence, however the request for allowing the admissible remission is not being considered even though the Superintendent of Jail vide his letter no. 621 dated 10th April, 2010 has written to the Remission Committee for considered which has not been considered and decided as yet. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that notwithstanding the above, petitioner proposes to file a representation for redressal of his aforesaid grievances before the respondent no.3. In case such representation is filed within a period of six weeks, the same may be considered in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of two months on receipt of such representation. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)