1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5192 OF 2009 Shankar s/o. Kalu Patil .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others. .. Respondents. --- Mr. R.M. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. V.D. Hon, Advocate for the respondent No.3 Mr. P.P. More, AGP for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : A.P. DESHPANDE & N.D. DESHPANDE,JJ. DATE : 12TH JANUARY, 2010. ORAL ORDER :- 1] The grievance made in the present petition is that the petitioner is subjected to frequent transfers on account of strained relations between the petitioner and the management because of the previous litigation. 2] The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is facing difficulties on account of his transfer effected by order dated 30th Jun3, 2009, transferring the petitioner from Wavade to 2 Nachankheda,Taluka Jamner and hence he has made representation to the management to grant him a convenient posting as desired by him. The grievance is that no decision has been taken on the said representation and communicated to the petitioner. 3] The learned counsel for the respondent Shri Hon informs that if an appropriate representation is made by the petitioner, the management would consider the same in accordance with law. 4] In the result the petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation within 4 weeks from today to the management and the management shall take a decision thereon within 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation and communicate the decision to the petitioner immediately. 5] With these directions petition is disposed of. [N.D. DESHPANDE,J.] [A.P. DESHPANDE.J.] Grt/- 3