1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE Civil Application No.2061 of 2008 In Writ Petition No.1031 of 2008 Tanna Realty Applicant (Org.Resp.No.6) Vs. Panoarama Premises Co-op.Soc.Ltd. and ors. Respondents (Resp.no.1-original petitioner) Mr.Manish Parekh with Mr.Brijesh Upadhyay i/b. M/s. Purnanand & Co. for applicant. Mr.Vivek Walawalkar with Mr.Arun Mehta i/b. M/s.Akshar Laws for resp.no.1 CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. September 12, 2008 P.C. . Heard. This application has been taken out for speaking to minutes in respect of my earlier order dated 11/4/2008 passed in Writ Petition No.1031 of 2008. I have gone through the corrections sought to be made and I am satisfied, and as has been admitted by the respondents, that in para 6 of the order dated 11/4/2008 the sentence "It was then made known that the defendant nos.1 to 4 had entered into an agreement with defendant no.5 on 22/2/2005 and, therefore, the suit was amended so as to implead defendant no.5" needs to be corrected and it is hereby directed to be 2 corrected as under "It was then made known that the defendant nos.1 to 4 had entered into an agreement with defendant no.5 on 22/2/2005." . The application is thus partly allowed and the Registry is directed to issue the corrected writ.