Criminal Misc. No.M-31074 of 2010 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-31074 of 2010 Date of decision:- 28.10.2010 Naresh and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present:- Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.M. Anand, Addl. A.G. Haryana. RAM CHAND GUPTA J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No.229 dated 22.9.2010, under Sections 323,325,452 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Kanina, District Mahendergarh. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. Co-ordinate Bench of this Court while issuing notice of motion on 19.10.2010, passed the following order:- “ Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the alleged occurrence took place in a plot, which was allegedly owned by the complainant. In the occurrence both the parties suffered injuries. The allegation that the petitioners had trespassed into the house is not made out. The injuries suffered by the persons were found to be simple in nature. Notice of motion for 28.10.2010. Criminal Misc. No.M-31074 of 2010 -2- In case of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. They shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called upon for investigation. They shall also be bound by all the conditions as contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.” It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have joined the investigation in pursuance of the said order. It has been stated by learned counsel for the respondent- State that the petitioners have joined the investigation and are no more required for any custodial interrogation. There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. In view of these facts and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, order dated 19.10.2010, granting interim bail to the petitioners-Naresh, Jaibir and Balwan, is, hereby made absolute subject to the compliance of conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. October 28, 2010 ( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE