^/ .•.••'t--\.^-<--iE!>'^'E>••'r'^^^n^~v^''v"^^':uv^^?^9i9^^:'S^^ t AC' !i:l 3N THE HK3H GOOaT OF SVBJSSSXaSS W 3 fSJ£IBR W.P.SO. OS- 1998 PETI'EIOK 'BNSEKABTXeLE 226. C®TSE'eONS-EIIIJTIOtI CW_JNB^ /•" '• .'• '':' .' . .'..-' . . • • • • •'•.•-. ".: '-» • ' • . • . .. . . .'•••• • .._ . :::: '. .'. ;_ g&fclttonert NttyanaBa Pathaik son @£ late ^-Iri Safna^iarpatfea^, Fesl<3ent of vtltage Blharpar (ebai»<anl), Tahsll Surajpui;, lOistrict Surguj a, M. P. 'veesus' •• . • ResDOBdeafcst 1. Tbs State ®fM.P.,thaougfa.Seeretary, Home B^arbiBenC, VaU.abb^Bhawaity »^ :..;... o^p^ ..- .' i 2. eolleCtor Surguja. ..» •• ••• l^'IgrtAoiitaFs.Q^tfee^l'etAtilgBSE't , • / •'•,:::. ^fPfSVWW v;jCTi.-«iqicw,y^'(i<i<»,R«ray'{ .k?^..^'§027^M.W^ 200- sn^?T ira'cp (ijciijei^) SII^^IOTRWR crai3ii^?i«b<ii* S^iTW^nf8?T3TI^?[ 1-9-2005 Mrs. Renu Kocllar, counsel| Mr. Ravi Ranjan Sinha, Par^ t-1eard learned counsel for| By way of this writ petitiij of India, the petitioner has order cancelling the petitioner'^ thdt giving intimation dated 2] peti+ioner was asked to deposit November, 1998. ; The case of the petitio[ antecedents and everything,, the^ on 5-8-1997 and accordingly, hej Company on 7-10-1997. Therea1|- gun, however, being a worker of false allegation against him anefl manner, the Respondent Coilectoi|' ~ Haying heard learned cou^ order dated. 3t'd March, 1998,. the -fire arm was tempordrily| registration of a case against |for1+ie pel-itioner. i^l Lawyer for the State/respondents. the pnrties. |n under Article 226 of the Constitution que^tioned the legality and propriety of the arm Kcenss.No.2/97 and consent upon ''-7-1998 '(Annexure P-1), whereby. the |the firearm rifle No.SP-971850 by 28th Thereaflter 4>|<l[d<fl'l *fl*ldT'f ls'^1 '((uit<(ix ^si^fan^f " her is that after verification of the petitioner was grante'd licence No.2/97 purchased a gun from; Jai Jawan Arms ', the petitioner had not misused the jt'he 8JP, opposite pdrty persons levelled without giving oiny notice, in arbitrary cancel.led the licence. [sel for the parties, I have per'tised the vthereby' license No.2/S7 for possessing suspended with ifflmediate effect on the petitioner. It appears from the .' '7< J l' *fPR5I vjCTt^ttiicw;;Bni'l<-f*i<»;KtiSK-iy'; .^;JT..^S^/^ 3n^STii^('|pfg%^ sii^a^TR-ijcb nairaii^STd'Hicb Soma reaord that criminat case No.2 506-B & 323 of the I.P.C. an registered againstthe petitione . Thispetition was filed in was suspended temporiarily and firearm. Now, the petitioner •tjie suspension order showing tl againsthim. Therefore, the petitjone respondent No.2 within a period aiso subrnit documents regardif was registered agdinst him an suspended. Respondent No.2 i^ of the. petitioner and the resi, reppesentation regar'ding: reyo| with law. With the observation anii disposed of. Parties are ehtitled for cj <l)|4(d4)'< *1|1rtT<t" ls'3'cluttsi'c ^SlKlHSII^?! • p/97 under Sections 147, 148, 149,294, y Section 25/27 bf the Apms Act was r cmd other persons. the year 1998, as the ticense in question the petitioner was asked to deposit the \xn approach the Coilector for r'avoking! \ie result »fthe crimmtti case registered " is al.lowed to make a representation to of two months from today and he.should ig the result df the crimincil case which d on account of which the license was directed to fionsider the reppesentatiori :lt of the.crifflinal case,and decide the mg of suspension orcfer, in accordance direction aforesaid, the petition stands rtified copy of this order. Sd/- L.C.BHADOO JUdge