IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.441 of 2002 CHANDRA DEEP PANDEY, SON OF LATE DHANUSHDHARI PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAMPUR KALA, POLICE STATION KHAIRA, DISTRICT SARAN… PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SARAN, CHAPRA 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SARAN, CHAPRA….RESPONDENTS ----------- 4. 29.07.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This writ application has been filed for payment of arrears of salary as well as difference of salary of the petitioner for certain period. From Annexure-5, it appears that the petitioner has filed a detailed representation before the District Superintendent of Education, Saran at Chapra on 15.10.2001. Learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that in paragraph 11 of the representation, details of the claim of the petitioner have been given under four heads which also contains the reference of earlier writ application filed by the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner appears to have - 2 - superannuated on 31.10.2002 and since then he has no further instruction with regard to the consideration and disposal of the said representation of the petitioner. In view of the above submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-District Superintendent of Education, Saran at Chapra to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.10.2001, a copy whereof has been annexed as Annexure-5. For the convenience of the District Superintendent of Education, Saran at Chapra, petitioner is given liberty to file a fresh copy of the said representation before him within a period of six weeks from today. In case the respondent-District Superintendent of Education has not disposed of the representation and has not passed orders on the claims of the petitioner, as mentioned in paragraph 11 of the representation, he shall do so within a period of two months after receipt of the copy of the representation from the petitioner. In case he does not find merit in any of the four claims of the petitioner made in the representation, he - 3 - shall pass a reasoned order strictly in accordance with law within that very period disclosing specific ground for rejection of specific claim. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the application is disposed of. B.T (J.N. Singh, J.)