^^^^^^^%%S^WMi;;^U^^^^^^^^^^^^ i^i^^'" c^/ 'Z5X> IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILAS^UR W. P. (SWo.'^T^ /2007(S.B. PETITIONER : •S^N^Remesh Lal NaiK ^w^l ^y-y.- €^ 's^y' VERSUS S/o Shri Arjun Lal Naik Aged about 43 years, Asst. Teacher, R/o Village -Auiurra Post - Barpali Via- Sariya, Tah.- Sarangarh, Dist : Raigarh-(C.G.) RESPONDENTS /:1 State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary School Education Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer Raigarh, Dist : Raigarh-fC.G.) Block Education Officer Block - Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2^6 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA HI6H COURr OF CHHATTISSARH AT BILASPUR W. P.(S} No. 894 of 2007 Petitioner Versus Ramesh Lal Naik State of Qihatt'isgarh and others SB: Hon'bte Mr. Justice Satish K. Agnihotri, J Present'. t^r. Vineet Kumar Pcndey, Advocate for the petitioner. AAr. Sushil t3ubey, 6ovt. Advocate for the State/ respondents. O R & ER l+h (Pas%d on this 14Tn &ay of February, 2007) 1. The petitioner was cppointed on 8.11.1988 (Annexure P/l) ds Assistant Teacher on fixed pay scale of Rs. 300/-. After comptetion of one year probation, he was granted regubr pay scale. 2. Leamed coun^l appearing for the petitioner submits +hat the issue involved Jn •ttie case is asto whether, • ie petitioner is entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initia! appointment or after completion of probation period. 3. The issue involved, herein was considered by +he Madhya Prodesh State Administrative Tribuna!, Jabalpur in O.A. No. 2745/89 (Madhukant Yadu and 56 others Vs. State of M.P. & o-thers), wherein it was held that the simitarly situated teachers are entitled to regular pay scale w.e.f. the date of initia! appointment. The matter was taken-up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Speciai Leave Petition (CwiQ No. 6892/93. The said petition was dismissed by the Hon'bte Supreme Court u tfie decision of the Tribuna) to ttie effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teachers are entEtied to regular pay scale from date of initiat oppointment. 4. Learneelcoun%I cypearing for the petitioners further submits +hat this Court, white considering the same issue in Sudiil Tiwari & others Vs. State Sovt. of Chhatt-isgarh & others (W.P. (5) No. 5976 of 2006) by order dated 7-11-2006, has granted regular poy scale w.e.f. the date of initia! appointment. 5. Leamed counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit -that •rtiis case is squarely covered by the decision of this Gourt- in -Hie case of Sushil Tiwari & others Vs. Stata 6ovt. of Chhattisgar+i & others (Supro). 6. In view of that, this pe+ition is atlowed in the same terms. No order Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge