<- r SWBi-E &ENGH c ^ , voof- ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION N0. 2-o^-^- QF 200G PETITIONER ^" ^\\..-\L; ^w^ %y' <^v ^v <<8° ;»'" ^" RESPONDENTS /l, l<u.. Pyari Bai Uraon, D/o Shri Nanhu ^ Ram Uraon, aged about 23 years, Resident of Village Madwa, Tahsil Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Social Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.). ^2. 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). Gram Panchayat Madwa, Through: Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Madwa, Janpad Panchayat Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 QL_THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRITJTLIHE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION AND/OR A SUITABLE DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE Xl-HC-22 's^^wspi, ^y1yli<».laRirey • sntg^i R<-< :sn^s wqNT'gfta c-.-* •Soma ^ w ^ sff^i'pgTW^fei '^T^raN 'tnH?rf ^ fs^ <f^f<^R. ^3rf:g*?3ii^T 2e-4-200S Mr. Alolc Batehi, counsel for the |;etitjoner. IVlr. Ashutosh Singh Kachwahi No.1 Mr. Vijay Krishnrao Deshmukh, (jiounsel for responclsnt No.3. Heard. By the instant writ petition unde)' Articte 226/227 of the Constiiution of tndia, the petitloner, who v/as wcrking as Pa}ichayat Karmi !n Gram Panchayat: Madwa, has questioned legality, propriety an4 of Panchayat Karmi wiii bs psrformsd has been sen/ed cn she petitioner and *I^Ai that in ths circumstancss, ths isarned , Govt. Advocate for the State/respondent correctness oftheorder dated 24-3-2006 whereby the Chief Eyecutive Officer, i^spondent No.2, has directed that the work iby Dharmendra Pafsi, as ihs pstmoner has been removed from the post of Pancha^at Karrm. Learned counael for the petitioiler submlts that so far no twmination order Ihe petifioner has prsferred appeal against Sub Divisiona! Officer, Dabhra, but that the order dated 24-3-2006 befors th^ appeal <s not betng decided by the i^rned S.D.O., Dabhra. He furitier submits S.D.O. be directed to decids the appea! of thsDStiiionsr. i The request made b\r learnedjcounse! for the petitioner is just, fav and reasonable. !n the circumstances, th^ S.D.O., Dabhra, ss directed to decide the appeai preferred by ths pstltioner asj sariy as possibie, fcut not iater than t'.vo months from today. i With the direction aforesaid, the jpetition stands disposed of. Consequ®ntiy,M.(Vv.)P.No.l557/2006aisostandsd!SpossdQf. Parties are entitled for certified cbpyoffcisorder. Sd/- i L.C.Bhadoo 4 Judge