IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 1ST PHALGUNA 1929 WP(C).No. 2852 of 2008(M) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER: ------------------ ABDUL GAFOOR, S/O.ISUPPU, BENGALAM HOUSE, P.O.BENGALAM, NEELESHWARAM, KASARGODE. BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENTS: ----------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KASARGODE. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.N. SANTHOSH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/02/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO: 2852/2008 M APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1. COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REPLACEMENT OF VEHICLE IN FORM PVM DT. 24/12/2007. EXT.P2. COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE R2 DT. 29/12/2007. EXT.P3. COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 10812/2007 DT. 22/06/2007. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL. True copy tga ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------------------ W.P.(C) 2852 of 2008 ------------------------------------- Dated: February 20, 2008 JUDGMENT The prayer sought for in this writ petition is to direct the respondent to consider Ext.P1 application for replacement. 2. The application itself was rejected on the ground that the financier's no objection certificate was not obtained. In Ext.P3 judgment this court has already held that there is no such requirement. Therefore, Ext.P2 order cannot be sustained and it is quashed. Accordingly, I dispose of this writ petition directing that the respondent shall consider Ext.P1 afresh with notice to the financier and pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE mt/-