( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4986 OF 1999 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4927 OF 1999 Rajkumar s/o Baburao Panchal APPLICANT VERSUS Uddeshwar Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha and another. RESPONDENT ..... Mr. D.N. Chamle, advocate holding for Mr. V.D. Gunale, advocate for the applicant. ..... [CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] [DATE : 12th March, 2010] PER COURT : 1. Heard. 2. The applicant is likely to be adversely affected if the petition is decided in favour of the petitioners. He, therefore, seeks intervention. He claims that he was subsequently appointed after allowing of the appeal filed by the respondent No.2 by the School Tribunal. In other words, there are competing claims of ( 2 ) the applicant and the respondent No.2. The applicant is, therefore, allowed to intervene in this petition. The civil application is accordingly allowed. [ V.R. KINGAONKAR ] JUDGE NPJ/ca4986-09