$ Q77/$J93§CJ/cr ma 5mm my mfw afzmm, m‘w WW? gyms o A (32»7F Eryn? war? arr‘nar af’r ga’rafw-e' fear? Haw WW. Warm: mm yaWr, fam WWW, farm naHgT—a Wamms faW' h/aamwg mm, :TIT - am, w? fmr farm, $Tazr, 's'°r.%s.w. am, wag-T 3E. 713g 2/mm" fmr mftwfr, navy: fa. nmgrr: {ww- 3. if? 3m §nTt Era'rn,‘ ETE‘ viva, WT awvg fera nmya 8mm Lu fr nTEHaTa mkm {13‘ Imam Wm, wTWsJTgaHHTx fmm nmgr-E 33am > ma? war wawfa uTrr 19 mftm an‘mm mlrfatm was § ..-._ HIGH COURT CF CHHAT !SGARH : giLASPUR x WR§T P§TSNGN (3} NO.435912G05 PETITSGNER Hem Kumar Sidar Versus RESPONDENE State of Chhattisgarh and others “m Present: ~ Shri F. S. Khare, counsei fort shri A. V. Shridhar, Panei Lawyer for the State. aML ORQER Passed on this 08f“ day of December, 2009) ‘berty to make a representation at subsequent Hef io the pefitioner to which ieamed before fhe respondent authority on fhe ground th deveiopmenf has granted partia! re State counse! has no objeciion. 2. It is ordered as prayed for. 3. According stared Hberty. 1y, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above» Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri ‘ Judge : 3' LE J: