1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Revision Application No.112 of 2011 (Jagdish s/o Kashinath Ghayade v. Smt. Kamlabai wd/o Kashinath Ghayade and another) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Shri S.S. Sharma, Advocate for Applicant. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J. Dated : 12 th September, 2011 Heard Shri Sharma, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. In the impugned order dated 30-6-2011, the Trial Court has held that the suit cannot be dismissed on the ground that the relief claimed in prayer clause (iii) of the plaint is barred by Section 158 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The Trial Court has held that it is a consequential relief. The question whether the plaintiff is entitled to relief in terms of prayer clause (iii) of the plaint or not, has not been decided by the Trial Court and it has been held that such a decision can be taken at the time of disposal of the suit. In view of this, no fault can be found with the order passed by the Trial Court. 2 The apprehension of Shri Sharma, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant-defendant, that the observations made by the Trial Court would come in the way of the applicant-defendant while finally disposing of the suit, is also baseless, as there is no such inference, which can be drawn from the reading of the order. In view of this, the civil revision application is dismissed. Judge pdl