IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA THURSDAY, THE 10TH JUNE 2010 / 20TH JYAISTHA 1932 Bail Appl..No. 3484 of 2010() -------------------------------------- CMP.2632/2010 of J.M.F.C.-II,ATTINGAL ........................................... (CRIME NO.294/10 OF KAZHAKOOTTAM POLICE STATION) PETITIONER(S): 2ND ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------- PRAVEEN @ KUTTU PRAVEEN, S/O.VIJAYAN, PINARUMOODU VEEDU, KAIMANAM, NEMOM VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.R.GOPAN RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAZHAKUTTOM POLICE STATION. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MR. M.S. BREEZ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.HEMA, J. ------------------ B.A. No. 3484 of 2010 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 10th day of June, 2010 O R D E R Petition for bail. 2. The alleged offence is under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution, petitioner(A2) along with first accused went in a Maruthi Car and they entered the shop of de facto complainant and snatched away Rs. 800/- and also a gold Bracelet worth half sovereign. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner was arrested on 30.04.2010 and he is in custody for the past 41 days. Recovery is over and no purpose will be served by detaining petitioner in custody. Petitioner has not snatched away any articles, it is submitted. 4. This petition is opposed. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that petitioner is involved in many other crimes of similar nature and it is not fit to grant bail to petitioner at this stage. 5. On hearing both sides I find it not fit to grant bail to petitioner at this stage. This petition is dismissed. K. HEMA, JUDGE ln