IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.9801 of 2011 CHANDRASEN YADAV SON OF LATE SHIVMANGAL CHAUDHARY. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 01.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the Ex-Mukhiya is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 387, 379 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner to have demanded money from the informant side. It appears from the impugned order that the informant has retracted from his initial version and filed an affidavit to that effect, which has been brought on record as Annexure-2. It is submitted that since the petitioner has to contest the Panchayat Election, hence, the frivolous case has been lodged to obstruct the petitioner from contesting the election. It is further submitted that for occurrence of 20.01.2011, the F.I.R., was lodged on 22.01.2011. 2 Considering the fact that the informant has retracted from his initial version, let the above named petitioner, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 18/2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Amrendra/- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)