IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.52985 of 2008 PANKAJ RAJ @ PANKAJ CHOUDHARY, son of Late Lallan Choudhary, resident of village + P.O. Piroo, P.S. Haspura , District – Aurangabad, Bihar Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 30.1.2009 Heard. The initial story is that the daughter of the informant was enticed or taken away by the petitioner and others. The girl appeared and her statement was recorded under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Besides, her age was assessed by the doctor and she was found aged about 19 years. Her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. indicates as if she could be going out of her house out of her own sweet will so as to going to the temple with the petitioner in order to getting married herself to him. It is true that the lady has attempted to somehow modify her statement in the later part of it but it was fairly conceded by the learned APP that that statement is not going to improve the prosecution story once she appears a consenting and willing person to company the petitioner. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M. Daud Nagar in Haspura P.S. Case No. 85 of 2008. Anil/ (Dharnidhar Jha, J.)