1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.478/2007 Dattatraya Nivrutti Liman & Ors. Petitioners Vs. M/s Mahendrakar and Associates and anr. Respondents Mr.Vivek Salunke i/b Mr.P.B.Shah for the petitioners Mr.S.R.Ganbavale for Res.1 & 2 CORAM: S.J.VAZIFDAR,J. DATE : 5th December,2008 P.C. 1] The concurrent findings of fact warrant no interference . 2] It is contended that the plaintiffs are not the landlords . The suit is filed by the two plaintiffs as the partners of the firm. Even according to the petitioners plaintiff no.2/respondent no.2 is their landlord. Thus even assuming that the property did not stand transferred to the partnership firm it would have made little difference. In any event both the Courts have considered the evidence and come to the conclusion that the property was transferred to the firm .Whether it is transferred to the firm by one of the partners is a question of intention. Both the partners confirmed the same. 3] As far as accommodation to be provided to the petitioner in the new construction, it is ready. The commissioner appointed by the Court has filed a report confirming the same. The learned counsel 2 appearing on behalf of the respondents states that the same shall be handed over to the petitioners. When all the formalities are completed. The C.R.A.is disposed of accordingly.