r~- t'-T-S-':T IBL.TM HIGH GODBT _ 07 JTOIGAIUBE KS BILASPUB (GHHATTISGARB) WBII^ PSITIOI'T Ho.2-103 O? 2006 •;'."r PEIISIONER :a ^ Burga Cflowbey, son of Raa Harayan €^y ^^ ^ spos^in's :- / Vs. 1. State of Ciahattisgarh: through: Birector, Panchaya-fc & Welfa.re BepaTtaent, D.K.Bhawan, Raipur (G.G) (-'•i'O' ^'^' P^C/V .0°it-t G ^s^ ^ ^a 2. Upper Colleetorj Aabikapur, dist;. Surgaja (C.&3 3. Sub-Divisional Officer,Ambikapur, Dls'b.Surgaja (G.G) / 4. Chief Bxecative Offieer, Jaapat Pancaayat, Ambikapur,dist. Surguja. / ?• Sarpaaeh, village Paachayat, Bargan-wa, P.0. Barganwa, P.S.Bariina, (aist.Surguja (G.G) ]@.T EEII'riON TOBER ABSICLE 226/227 OF_THS GOSSTIIBmOH OF IS®IA XI-HC-22 •sii^rw feriqi'aii^T •aTqwgt?g ,. ® "rssi^iRRra, e, faciiwi< ^.....^f.^^, an^iTOnwgfCT The cass of -riie setitionl Wili-f4)-1 iniRfl •qfest ifeSTi: ^'arfigTisn^l 27.4.2006 Oi". Shciiesh Ahuja, Advocjtte for The petitioner. Mr. Ashd+osh Kachwoha, C|y. @vvt.Mv. for ths S+ats. 1-ieard. The main grievance of Ti^e pstitioner is thct respondent No.4 is not aliowin9 tiie petitioner to Join hia duties on the post of Piinchayat Ksrmi of ©romPcnchayat Bar'gau)an. ^r is that he was worksng as Ponchcyat Karmi in -riie 6ram Panchayat pa^awan, hig services were terminated vide order dated 24.2.2005 agsjnst which he preferred cm appest before th®Sub Oiyi.sionial Officer, Am^ikeyur whieh eam®to be dismissed vid® order- dated 8.11.2005. Aggrie^jed by the order of SDO, tne petitioner fsied a revision petition beforsjthe Upper Cotlector, Ambikspurand the Uppsr Cotiector vids order dat^d 24.2.2006 aiiowed the revision pstition of the petitioner, set aside •^se. resoSution of Srans Panchayat- datea 24.2.2005 a"d alsotheorder 4ited 8.11.2005 passed by +he S.&.G., but in spi+e of wie order of Uppsjr ColiecTor dated 24.2.200&, raspondent No.4 isnoTnilowing *he petition^r To Join The duties of PtmchGyaTKarir,!. . Perusa! of order dated 2^.2.2006 passed by the Upper Coliector in Revenue Cose No.02/A-89/05-p6 reveals that the Upper Coltector has aliowed the appea!, set sside ^he order of 500 ond resoiution of the $ram Panchayat, thsrsfore,] +he pstitioner is sntitled for the [^^fe^^ r Yi: XI-HC-22 •s^^fpn"R, sxflti'ie, sn^i-Efii I^RTsnis? wtiN^afiti ~7fc" ^ ^ •>- sn^E'^snwHfN reSDondent No.4 is directed petitione" end he shouid e'iow qnqferih •WRif'?'fe^tifSR^ ^?3ip?n3ii^i r'einstatement of services as P^nchayat Karmi. The pe-ritioner e^Bh mccie representation before the Chpef Exscutive Offieep, Janpad PonchayaT, Ambikcpur vide Istter-dated ^4.3.2006, but evsn then he hus not bean aiiowed to join •rtie fiuties. The action of responjient Nc.4 is prima-facie arbitrary and contrairy to the decision of the Upper Coliector, therefpre; -Hie to consider 1he representation of ths the petitioner t6 joiri the duties on the post of Panchayat for'mi, »r<in^ Panchcyat 8ar9awan in pursuance of the order of Upper Coiiector datedj 24.2.2006. Wi+h the direetion afore^aid, fn®pstition stoinds disposed of. Cer'tified copy as perrul4's. ci^i. -. L.C. Bhadoo Judge [iw&^g^ L