IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.40131 of 2009 ARUN VISHWAKARMA SON OF SRI BACHCHU VISHWAKARMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.S. ROH, DISTT. NAWADA ----- PETITIONER. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 07/12/2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The offence alleged is under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the allegation of kidnapping is not correct. As a matter of fact the victim girl is being major, married with the petitioner and both are living together as husband and wife. Learned counsel further submits that the victim girl has also supported the submissions as it would be apparent on perusal of her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C. As per the informant, the age of victim girl is 17 years whereas she herself has claimed her age in her statement made under Section 164 Cr.P.C. as 18 years and four months. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State submits that there is allegation of kidnapping against the petitioner although, the victim girl and the petitioner has already married. The petitioner does not deserve bail the privilege of anticipatory bail. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is 2 directed that in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 58 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. S.Ali (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)