^ Llv" Ad75 i/ ^^i ^^ o .{ • iooL- IN THE HON»BLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Sl N0. '39^ OF 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^'"^,-/ ^y /\y< y ^ ^.'" ..^' :'-^ ^y ^ ^. ^ P.K.Tiwari S/o Shri Babu Lal Tiwari, aged about 57 years, R/o H/6, GAD Quarters, Narayanpur^ Distt.--Bsst^- (C.G.) VERSUS ^ 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through - the Secretary, Aadim Jati, Anusuchit Jati, Pichhada Varg tatha Alpasankhyak Kalyan Vibhag, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.). 2. State of Madhya Pradesh, through - the Secretary, Aadim Jati Vibhag, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.). ^ 3 Union of India, through - the Secretary, Ministry of Personnel and Public Grievances, New Delhi. /4. The Commissioner Aadim Jati, Anusuchit Jati, Pichhada Varg tatha Alpasankhyak Kalyan Vibhag, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) / 5. The Commissioner, Aadiwasi Vikas Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal (M.P.) (^- 1 6. The Deputy Director, Aadim Jati tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) .-7. The Principal, Govt. Boys Higher Secondary School Narayanpur (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA w-^li^w^-^^^ s^fwww&^wS^S^^S^SS HIGH COURT OF CHHATTI8GARH AT BILASPLTR WRIT PETITION (8) No. 399 of2010 PETITIONER : P.K.Tiwari. VERS^US RESPONDENTS : State ofChhattisgarh & Ofhers. Writ Petition Under Article 226 CtfThe Constitution Oflndia SB: Hon»bleShri Satish K. Aeniliotri, J. Present: Shri R.R.Soni with Stei Sameer Sin^i, Advocates for the petttioner. Shri A.V.Shri(Uiar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respoiKlmt No, 1,4,6 and7. Smt. Fouzia Mirza, Assisfcmt Solicitor General for the Union of India. ORALORDISR (Passed on 28 day of Jaimary, 2010) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petition^-, on instmctions, seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this petitioa witfi liberty to pursue the representation dated 19.01.2010 (Amiexure P/10) penditig before the respondent-authorities. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for otfaer side have no objection. 3. It is ordered as prayed for. 4. Consequently, fhe vmt petition is dismissed as withriravm wtfh tte aforestated liberty, ifso advised. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit