IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 111 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 864 OF 2009 GIRIDHAR DEUSEKAR ... Applicant Versus STATE OF GOA ... Respondent Mr. Valmiki Menezes, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. G. Shirodkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. A. D. Bhobe, Advocate for the original petitioner. Coram:- S.B. DESHMUKH & F. M. REIS, JJ. Date:- 15th November, 2010 P.C.:- We have heard the learned Counsel Mr. Menezes for the applicant, Mr. Shirodkar, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents and Mr. Bhobe for the original petitioner. Even though no reply is filed, Mr. Bhobe, learned Counsel appearing for the original petitioner vehemently opposes the application filed by the applicant. After hearing the Counsel appearing for the parties, in our opinion, this application can be favourably considered. Accordingly, we are inclined to allow this application in terms of the prayer clause. Civil application is accordingly disposed of. The applicant be impleaded as party respondent to the writ petition. The amendment to be carried out within one week. Let the writ repetition be placed on the cause list of this Court in the category "fresh admission" on 29th November, 2010. S.B. DESHMUKH, J. F. M. REIS, J. ssm.