IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRL.P.No.10811 OF 2010 Between:- Parvez and 10 others …Petitioners A n d The State of A.P., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another …Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY CRL.P.No.10811 OF 2010 ORDER: This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., for quashing further proceedings against the petitioners/A- 4 to A-14 in Cr.No.327 of 2010 of Women Police Station, Charmainar, Hyderabad. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners/accused and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. Perused the records. 3. Petitioners/A-4 to A-14 along with others i.e., A- 1 to A-3 are accused of offence under Section 498-A IPC in Cr.No.327 of 2010 of W.P.S., Charminar. A-1 is husband of the second respondent-complainant, A-2 is the mother of A-1, A-3 is the daughter of A-2 and the first petitioner/A-4 is the husband of A-3. Other petitioners 2 to 11 i.e., A-5 to A-14 are distant relations of A-1. The second respondent herein gave a complaint making certain allegations pertaining to the offence under Section 498-A IPC mainly against her husband A-1, mother-in-law/A-2 and sister-in-law/A-3. The complaint does not disclose any specific allegations against the petitioners/A-4 to A-14 and no overt acts are also attributed to them. 4. Under those circumstances, it is considered that the investigation may go on, but however, the petitioners/A-4 to A-14 may not be arrested in Cr.No.327 of 2010 of Women Police Station, Charmainar, Hyderabad, till the conclusion of such investigation and filing of charge sheet, if any. 5. In the result, the criminal petition is disposed of accordingly as stated above. _____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J 24th November, 2010 Note: Cc by tomorrow B/o Lrkm.