IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.5806 of 2010 ISLAM MIAN . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.7145 of 2010 ALISHER MIAN . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 26.2.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioners is that the deceased had illicit relation with one Nagina Khatoon wife of Kasim Mian who is an accused. The two were done away with and the petitioners have been named on suspicion. The submission in Cr. Misc. No. 5806 of 2010 is that he is not named and is similarly situated as co- accused, granted bail in Cr. Misc. No.39694 of 2009. The defence in Cr. Misc. No. 7145 of 2010 is that the impugned order of rejection notices no overt act on his part from the case diary except naming him on suspicion only. In absence of any cogent material in the impugned order of the nature of the materials against the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 7145 of 2010 collected during investigation, let the petitioners above named be 2 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, District- West Champaran in connection with Ramnagar P.S. Case No. 226 of 2009. It is made clear that the grant of bail in Cr. Misc. No. 7145 of 2010 is based on the nature of the materials contained in the impugned order of rejection. P. Kumar (Navin Sinha, J.)