CW 3531/10 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3531/10 Dr. Brijendra Singh Versus State & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 16/03/2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. B.L. Avasthi, for petitioner *** Petitioner's certificate of registration, which was renewed upto 22nd January, 2012, was suspended in exercise of power u/s.20(3) of the Act, 1994 vide order dt.14th January, 2010 [Ann.8]. Against the order impugned, petitioner preferred appeal u/s.21 of the Act on 11th February, 2010 but since it has not been decided despite 30 days expired which is the time schedule provided for disposal of appeals U/r.19 of Rules, 1996, instant writ petition has been preferred. Counsel submits that delay in its pendency is causing great prejudice to the petitioner. It has also been urged that order has not been passed by the competent authority and is in contravention of the provisions of the Act, 1994. What has been urged by petitioner is available for the appellate authority to consider and examine on merits. But, since time schedule provided U/r.19 for disposal of appeal has expired and still it has not been decided so far. Certainly delay must be causing prejudice to the CW 3531/10 [2] petitioner. Without going into merits of the matter at this stage, this Court considers it appropriate to direct the appellate authority to decide the appeal within 15 days from the date of certified copy of the order is being served in their office. However, if petitioner feels aggrieved by their decision, he will be at liberty to avail remedy available under law. With these directions/observations, writ petition stands disposed of. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA3531CW10 16-03.doc