IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.43652 of 2008 SANJIB KUMAR @ GUDU KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2/ 21/11/2008. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a police case under Sections- 363, 366A and 376 of I.P.C. The submission is that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. which names only one Akhilesh Paswan @ Aklu. The impugned order of rejection notices that the petitioner has been named in the statement by the victim boy. The issue of a disputed identity sought to be raised by the petitioner is an aspect to be appropriately considered by the court below in regular bail application. The application is rejected. Any application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner shall be considered by the court below on its own merits, without being prejudiced by the present order of rejection. KC ( Navin Sinha, J )