: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.17 OF 2008 Shri Nandkumar D. Kalokhe & Anr. ..Applicant. Vs. Shri Yashwant G. Kadam ..Respondent. Mr.A.V.Anturkar for the Applicant. Mr.P.K.Dhakephalkar i/b.Mr.N.P.Shimpi for Respondent No.1. Mrs.M.J.Shekhar i/b.J.Shekhar & Co. for Respondent No.2. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : 1ST APRIL, 2008 DATED : 1ST APRIL, 2008 DATED : 1ST APRIL, 2008 P.C. : P.C. : P.C. : The matter is decided against the Applicant by the two judgments delivered by the learned Single Judges of this Court in the case of Namgonda Jingaonda Patil v. Appasaheb Bapurao Walwekar & Ors., 2000 (Supp.) Bom.C.R., 582 and Kedar Shivkumar Kale v. Digamber Shridhar Mhapsekar & Ors., 2007(4), MH.L.J., 77 2. Merely because Section 22 of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 is not referred to would not entitle me to take a different view. Nor would the : 2 : possibility as contended by Mr.Anturkar of conflicting decisions entitle me to take a different view. I am bound by the said judgments irrespective of the same. 3. In the circumstances, the Civil Revision Application is dismissed.