IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 3559 of 2001 (M/S) (Old No. 37321/1998) Punjab National Bank. ............ Petitioner Versus Addl. District Judge & another. .............. Respondents Mr. J.S. Bisht, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sharad Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Hon’ble V.K. Gupta, C.J. After hearing the arguments of Mr. J.S. Bisht, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and upon going through the impugned order, I find that the amendment allowed by the learned court below vide the impugned order was justified in the facts and circumstances of case. No fault can be found with the said order. In my considered opinion, respondent No.2 / plaintiff was justified in asking for the amendment in the Plaint, which has rightly been allowed. No interference is called for. The writ petition is dismissed. (V.K. Gupta, C. J.) 19.12.2008 G