1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO.668 OF 1994 Bank of Baroda ...Plaintiffs vs. M/s.Nirala Construction & Ors. ...Defendants None for the plaintiffs Mr.Amit Kanani i/b M/s.Hariyani & co. for the defendants CORAM :A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JANUARY 7, 2011 P.C.: 1 None appears for the plaintiffs. Ex-parte decree has been already passed as against the 2nd and 4th defendants. Office remarks shows that summons for judgment has not been taken out as against the 1st and 3rd defendants. This is a fit case where the power under Rule 227 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules,1981 should be exercised by dismissing the suit. Accordingly, the suit is dismissed as against the 1st and 3rd defendants for want of prosecution. JUDGE