IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16910 of 2011 Chunnu Mallik Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 24.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Patepur P.S. Case No. 156 of 2004 registered under Sections 304(B)and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The marriage was performed three years prior to occurrence. The accusation is of demand of dowry and torture. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the informant retracted from his initial version. Since the case was instituted in 2004, this court is not inclined to interfere. Let the learned court below consider the regular bail application of the petitioner and try to dispose off the same preferably on the same day if possible considering the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner if 2 the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned C.J.M. Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Patepur P.S. Case No. 156 of 2004 at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)