IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 18 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 165 OF 2007 MR. RAJENDRA MADHUKAR FALLARI AND 2 ORS. ... Petitioners Versus M/S. SHRINIVAS CONSTRUCTIONS THROUGH PARTNERS ... Respondents Shri D. P. Bhise, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri H. D. Naik, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 26th March, 2009 P.C.:- Heard Shri D. P. Bhise, learned Counsel on behalf of the Petitioners and Shri H. D. Naik, learned Counsel on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Learned Counsel on behalf of both parties state that the open portions to the tenanted houses of the Petitioners have been closed by a brick wall and two photographs have been produced, the same are taken on record. Shri Naik, learned Counsel states that Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have no objection in case the incomplete roof over and above the said brick walls is completed not more than 50 cms. beyond the said wall. The statement is accepted. In view of the said statement, nothing survives in this Contempt Petition and Shri Bhise, learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the same. Dismissed as withdrawn. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.