IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. REV. No.805 of 2008 JAHIR HUSSAIN……Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Shaida Khatoon 3. Nagma Khatoon 4. Nagma Khatoon ……Opposite parties ----------- 2. 18.12.2008. This revision application has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 8.5.2008 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Motihari in Maintenance Case No. (M)180/2007 thereby the petitioner has been directed to pay interim maintenance of Rs.3600/- per month in total to the opposite parties i.e. wife and two female children. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order. The marriage is not in dispute. Under the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned order of interim maintenance. Accordingly, this application is rejected. However, court below is directed to dispose of the main case within four months from the date of the receipt of this order. The arrears amount, if any, shall be paid by the petitioner in three equal instalment within three months, failing which opposite parties shall take appropriate steps under the law for its realization. Till date, distress warrant issued against the petitioner shall remain stayed. kanchan (Ghanshyam Prasad, J.)