1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD C.A. No. 3642 of 2009 with C.A.No. 3643 of 2009 with FAST No. 5748 of 2009 and C.A. No. 3644 of 2009 with C.A.No.3645 of 2009 with FAST No. 5751 of 2009 ______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ Smt. A.V.Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for applicants Date : 30th November, 2009 1. Heard learned A.G.P. 2. There is delay of 322 days for filing first appeal. The State feels aggrieved by enhancement of compensation by the learned reference Court from Rs.29,000/- per Hectare to Rs.30,000/- per Hectare. The reasons assigned for getting the delay condoned, indicate that after the Judgment dated 29th January, 2008, the application for certified copy was belatedly filed. 2 Copies were received on 5th December, 2008. The matter was routed to several authorities. Though it is contended by the learned A.G.P. that the State has a strong or meritorious case, however, I do not prima facie find the same adding the situation of non-explanation of delay. Consequently, delay of 322 days cannot be condoned. Hence, applications are rejected. Necessary court fee be refunded. 3. In view of rejection of applications for condonation of delay, appeals and C.A. Nos. 3643 of 2009 and 3645 of 2009 accordingly disposed of. (K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.) srm/ca3642/09 3 4