1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :15.12.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16183 of 2011 Iyyakutty Thevar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of POlice, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of POlice, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manamadurai Sub Division, Sivagangai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Manamadurai Taluk,Sivagangai District. 4.The Villge Administrative Officer, Melarangiyan Group, Thiruppuvanam Union, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District. 5.The Inspector of Police, palayanoor Police Station, Thiruppuvanam Union, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to issue a direction to the respondents not to interfere in the civil dispute in the petitioner's property in order dated 4.6.2010 made in O.S. No. 124 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District and pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Udhayakumar For Respondents: Mr.P.Kannithevan Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) O R D E R This criminal original petition has been filed to issue a direction to the respondents not to interfere in the civil dispute in the petitioner's property in order dated 4.6.2010 made in O.S. No. 124 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2.Heard Mr.R.Udhayakumar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Kannithevan, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State. 3.The main grievance of the petitioners is that without any valid reason, the respondents are harassing the petitioner for which the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) would gainsay such allegations. 4. Whatever might be the circumstances, there shall be no harassment to the petitioner and the respondents are directed not to interfere with the civil transaction, but let the police investigate into the matter in accordance with law and the mandates as found set out in D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610. If really, the police want to interrogate, it is open for the police to issue summons to the petitioner. Thereupon, the petitioner shall appear before the police and submit himself for interrogation. The petitioner is also permitted to take the assistance of the Advocate to the limited extent as found envisaged in the precedent cited supra. With the above direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(W) /True copy/ Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The Superintendent of POlice, Office of the Superintendent of Police,Sivagangai District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of POlice, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manamadurai Sub Division,Sivagangai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Manamadurai Taluk,Sivagangai District. 4.The Villge Administrative Officer, Melarangiyan Group,Thiruppuvanam Union, Manamadurai Taluk,Sivagangai District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Palayanoor Police Station,Thiruppuvanam Union, Manamadurai Taluk,Sivagangai District. 6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Gsr Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16183 of 2011 15.12.2011 TR : 21.12.2011 : 2p/7c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/