FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE ORIGINAL SIDE ORIGINAL SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.1099 OF 2007 -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders. coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Prothonotary’s : orders. : -----------------------------------:------------------------------------- Mr.J.P.Cama i/b Crawford & Bayley & Co. for the petitioners. Mr.V.A.Pai for the respondents. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATED: 16TH OCTOBER, 2007 DATED: 16TH OCTOBER, 2007 DATED: 16TH OCTOBER, 2007 P.C.: . Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Mr.Cama, learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that he has instructions to withdraw this petition. However, Mr.Cama submits that the labour court may be directed to pass Part II award uninfluenced by the observations made in Part I award. To this submission Mr.Pai, learned counsel for the respondents did not seriously oppose since according to him, the labour court will have toconduct a fresh trial. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties I am satisfied that this petition can be disposed of by the following order: . The petition is allowed to be withdrawn. All contentions of both the sides are kept open. It is needless to express that the labour court after giving an opportunity to the petitioners to justify the punishment awarded to the respondent-employee by adducing evidence shall pass Part II award on merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made in the impugned Part I award. With this observation the writ petition is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.) (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)