IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.17619 of 2010 1. POONAM KUMARI W/O SRI SANTOSH THAKUR R/O VILL.- PANCHTAKI RAM, P.S.- BAIRGANIA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI---------- ---------------------------------------PETITIONER Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 3. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA 4. THE DISTRICT TEACHER APPOINTMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY SITAMARHI THROUGH THE PRESIDING OFFICER 5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SITAMARHI DISTT.- SITAMARHI 6. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SITAMARHI, DISTT.- SITAMARHI 7. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BAIRGANIA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI 8. THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, BAIRGANIA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI 9. THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ PANCHTAKI JADU, BLOCK- BAIRGANIA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI 10. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ, PANCHTAKI JADU, BLOCK- BAIRGANIA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI—RESPONDENTRS ----------- 2 16.5.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Whatever the background to the dispute raised by the petitioner with regard to her non-selection as Panchayat Shiksha Mitra the fact as stands today that after coming of the Appointment Rule 2006 the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra stood abolished with effect from 1.7.2006. If that being so then the tribunal has done no wrong for cancelling the claim of the petitioner for appointment. To that extent no interference with the order is required and the petitioner cannot be appointed on the non-existent post. The submission of the petitioner that private respondents have been retained in service as Panchayat Shikash and petitioner was removed is yet another issue which will not beget any relief in favour of the petitioner. This writ application is dismissed. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)