C/g )a’$’_ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR CHHATI'ISGARH w.P. (S) No. §0%§ 12011 / PETITION ER Najeer Khan S/o Shri Hazi Asraf Khan, aged about S6 years, Posted as Revenue Inspector, Nazul, Mungeli, Dsitrict Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENT State of Chhattisgarh, throughi the Secretary, Department of Revenue & Disaster Management, , D.K.S. Bhawan, Manatralaya, Raipur (C.G.) Director, Directorate - of Revenue, Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, O/o Commissioner, BHaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) Collector, Land Bilaspur, Bilaspur (C.G.) Record, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA: / @ HIGH C01 JRT OF CHHAT’TISGARH AT BILASPI IR WRIT PETITION {S z No. 5085 of2011 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTIC! ,E 226 OF THE CONSTITI JTION OF INDIA w SB: Hon’ble $hri Satish K. A ihOtri J. Present: Shri Akhilesh Kumar: Advocate for the petitioner. A: W Shri V.V.S. Moorlhy, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents‘ Shzi S.P. Navratna, Dy. Commissicner (R), Bilaspur, is present. ORDER ORAL (Passed on 06 day of September, 201 I) 1. At the very outset, Shri Mommy, learned counsel appearing for the Siam/respondents, on instmctions, Submits fhat the order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexure ’P/l) impugned herein, has not been passed by a. competent authorit§m accordanoe with Rule 20, Part II, of the Madhya Pradesh/Chhattisgarh Land Record Manual, thus, the same is unsustainable in law and shall not be given effect. to. In View of the above submission made by learned State counseh according to learned counsel for the petitioners; nothing survives for adjudication at. this stage. . Accordingly, the impugned order dated 12.08.2011 (Annexure P/l) is quashed. However, liberty is reserved to the State/respondents to pass appropriate order, if so advised, in accordance with law, in administrative exigency and in public interest. The writ petition is allowed No order asto costs. .. ....l..MM V Sdl— ' ‘ M'“ \ MMA‘w . Satish K. Agmhogri Judge 3S PETITIONER : Najeer Khan. RESPONDENTS VERSI IS