1 caf258 ssp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET CIVIL APPLICATION NO.258 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.1190 OF 2011 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.Akshay Shinde i/b Mr.A.M.Kulkarni for the Applicant None for the respondents CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : JUNE 13,2011 P.C.: 1 Heard learned counsel for the applicant. None appears for the 1st and 3rd respondent who are contesting parties. 2nd respondent is not a necessary party. 2 The applicant who is the claimant in a claim petition under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act,1988 has set out reasons for long delay in preferring the appeal. In view of what is stated in paragraph 7 of the application, sufficient cause is made out. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). JUDGE