HiGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR S.B.: HON'BLESHRI JUSTECESUNILKUft/SARSiNHA ^ CONTEMPT_CASEiClMa_227/2010 PrnTJQNER R.P. Sahu, S/o Shri D.P., Sahu, aged about 49 years, working as Draftsmen, Office of Executive Engineer, Water Resources Divisson, Korba (C.G.) RESPONDENT VERSUS Mr. C.K. Khetan, Secretary, Water Resources Department, Secretariat, D.K.S. Building, Raipur (C.G.) CQNTEIWT PETITSON UNDERARTICLE 21_^OE_THE^ONST|LUTjQN QF 3NDIA Appearance: Mr. Sameer Behar.^/oc<a4<~ ^rfiti. p^l^isha^ . ORALORDER (17.09.2010) SUSSSIL KUIVIAR SiNHAJ. Heard on admission. Petitioner- R.P. Sahu has filed this petitlon for initiatlon of proceeding of contempt for disobedience of the order dated 12.08.2010 passed in W.P.(s) No. 4474/2010. IVIr. Sameer Behar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that after passing of order dated 12.08.2010, the petitioner made a representation before the respondent but no decision has been taken by the respondent. Therefore, the respondent has committed contempt of the Court's order dated 12.08.2010. This Court whiie disposing W.P(s) No. 4474/2010 passed the foliowing order on 12.08.2010. "Heard. Learned counsei for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition v^ith Siberty to fiie a representation. Permission granted. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withasrawn with the aforesaid iiberty granted In favour of the petitioner." A perusal of the eariier order wouid shovv? that there was no direction issued by this Court, therefore, it cannot be said that if the NY^ "% .^' ^^} ^w,^- CONTEIVJPT CASE (C} N0. 227/2010 representation filed by the petitioner has not been decided by the respondent, it would amount to contempt of order dated 12.08.2010 in view ofthe above, 1 do not find any substance in this petition; the petition is iiable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed summariiy. Sd/- Sunil KumarSinha Judge