WP(C) 4294/2011 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI The petitioner is a LP School, which claims that it ought to have been given the financial assistance by the Government in terms of the Government policy, but, while the petitioner has been denied the grant of financial assistance, others h ave been granted financial assistance, though they were established after the pe titioner school. This aspect, with regard to the other parameters, which are req uired for the purpose enabling an LP school to receive financial assistance, the petitioner school stand on a much better footing. What, now, needs to be noted is that the petitioner has not made other s chools parties to the writ petition, which have been illegally granted financial assistance despite the fact that they were established, according to the petiti oner on dates later than the date of establishment of the petitioner school and whose various other parameters were not as good as the petitioner school. Withou t making the said other schools parties to the writ petition, the present writ p etition cannot be sustained. It is further submitted, on behalf of the petitioner, that even if other school s were granted financial assistance illegally, the petitioner’s name, being in t he list of schools, which were selected for granting financial assistance, the p etitioner school ought not to have been denied grant of financial assistance. While considering the above submission made on behalf of the petitioner, it need s to be noted that the financial assistance would be distributed according to th e availability of fund with the Government. It is, therefore, not necessary at a ll nor it is imperative in law that all schools whose names find place in the se lect list must be given financial assistance. If there is any illegality committ ed, while picking up a school for granting financial assistance and ignoring the reby a more deserving one, the Court’s, interference in exercise of its power, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, would be permissible, but not in a case, where the petitioner does not implead other schools which have been gra nted financial assistance ignoring the claim of the petitioner. Situated thus, it becomes clear that this writ petition cannot be admitted and is therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs.