IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 8844 of 2008. Decided on: 13.12.2010. __________________________________________________________ Vinod Kumar. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Ms. Kiran Dhiman, Advocate vice Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Respondent No.4 ex-parte. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate for respondent No.5. Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral): Petitioner has assailed the appointment of respondent No.5 to the post of Part-Time Water Carrier in Government Primary School, Kadh, Tehsil Amb, District Una. Petitioner has claimed that he was appointed as Part-Time Water Carrier pursuant to resolution dated 26th November, 1999. However, the fact of the matter is that the petitioner has participated in the selection process. He has been given 13 marks and respondent No.5 has been given 25 marks by the duly constituted Selection Committee. Since the suitability of both, i.e. petitioner and respondent No.5 has been adjudged by the duly constituted Selection Committee, this Court will not sit in appeal 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - over the recommendations made by the Selection Committee. So far as the claim of petitioner based on Notification dated 1st September, 2001 is concerned, suffice to say that the petitioner has abandoned his claim of seeking appointment by participating in fresh selection process. Accordingly, there is no merit in this petition and the same is dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 13, 2010. (sck).