I S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.320/2005 IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2649/2005 Date of order :: 17.04.2008 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr.H.S. Sidhu, for the petitioners. Mr.S.K. Vyas, Govt. Advocate. Mr.Hemant Choudhary, for the respondents. Head learned counsel for the parties. In para 3 of the contempt petition it is stated by the petitioners that respondents are flouting the order passed by this Court on 05.05.2005 whereby an interim order was passed to maintain status quo as it exist today. Para 3 of the contempt petition reads as under:- “3. That initially the stay order was given on 06.05.2005 and copy was supplied to the respondent on 07.05.2005, after that it was in the knowledge of the respondent that the Hon'ble Court has granted an interim order to the petitioners even then the petitioner No.1 was relieved from service on 31.05.2005 and petitioner No.2 was relieved on 09.06.2005 by an verbal order passed by the respondent.” In para 6 of the reply filed by the non-petitioners, it is categorically stated by the respondents that:- “6. That, nonetheless, in compliance of II interim order dated 05th May, 2005 passed by this Hon'ble Court, the petitioners were not relieved from the work and as per above said sanction vide Annx.-R/1, they were allowed to continue. In this view of the matter, no case of willful disobedience is made out. However, the petitioners can raise all grounds on their claim in the writ petition while arguing the case. In this contempt petition according to the reply petitioners were allowed to work till the period of scheme Annexure-R/1. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. A.K. Chouhan/-