smGLE BENCH” m THE HIGH :QQRT GE: JimiéaTURE E? EILA$M$ (CHHATTISGARH) CONTEMPT PETITION HO .....(g..“i2005 Arismg ms! cf the am‘er - 4m dated 43M passed [‘3 $4 005 MiMf/lb‘f. in W.P. No; , by Hari’ma Jim {ic’e Sim!“ £§5§imk§iff /§achid§:mrid Prasaa, Sm Lafe Shri iahwa?i Pragaci, 6 1 V aged about 65 years, R10 my Jaiguru Pashuahar Kendra, I X £§§TEE§T PETITSQH UP3§ER ARTmiE E15 3F YHE ‘ £6NST§TUT§OH OF mm§ The appHcant begs'ta submit as under: - " if“: .‘$o’». N §fé§ ~§ f; Purijab Ambikapur, District q.%' Q? é‘ Ni. ’ Q‘ 4w $ Surguja(C.G.) VERSUS CONTEMNORSI : 1. B.L. Thakur, RESPONDENTS Commissioner, Triha! Weifare Emmi? @Gj 2. KR. Thakur,_ Asaistam Cnmmiss-iunér, Tribal Development, Ambikapur, District Surguja (0G,) 3. Rajesh Shrivastava, Joint Directnr, Treasury, Accounts and Pension, hmian Chawk EHaEgur ~ {3.3) Sachidanand Prasad Vs. ContemnorslRespondents B.L. Thakur ahd Others Present: Shri R.N. Pusty, counsel for the appliaant. Shri V.R. Tiwari, counsel for the respondents. ORAL ORDER (Passed on 28m February, 2007) The respondents have filed their counter affidavit. In that they l‘ have stated that the substantial compliance of the orders and directions issuedby this Court has been carried out. l have no reason to doubt the correctness of the statement made by the respondents. Therefore. for the present, the contempt petition need not be kept alive. Therefore, the contempt petition is rejected for the present. Ordered accordingly.