WP(C) 3233/2009 BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Heard Mr Buragohain, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Also hea rd Mr Ghosh, learned State Counsel for the respondents. Having regard to the nature of the grievance raised, this Court is of th e opinion that this petition ought to be disposed at the motion stage. The petitioner, who is presently serving as a Sub Engineer in Boginadi D evelopment Block, Boginadi, Lakhimpur was entrusted with the responsibility of e xecuting the works under three Gaon Panchayats/Anchalik panchayat vide order da ted 21.5.2009 of the Block Development Officer, Boginadi Development Block, Nor th Lakhimpur. The petitioner asserts that inspite thereof, on a verbal instruct ion of the Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur to the Block Development Officer, Bogi nadi Development Block, he has not been permitted to execute the works so allott ed. His representation dated 10.7.2009 with the Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur, North Lakhimpur also remains undisposed till date. Being aggrieved, he is befo re this Court. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this Court considers i t expedient to close this petition with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur, North Lakhimpur to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s represe ntation on merits. In doing so, the said authority would afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner who would present himself before him(Deputy Commiss ioner) on 24.08.2009. It is made clear that, this Court has not offered any comm ent on the merits of the petitioner’s challenge made herein and the aforemention ed authority would pass appropriate orders on his representation on a considerat ion of all relevant materials and in accordance with law. However, as the issue pertains to execution of public works, the petitioner’s representation should be disposed of within a period of two weeks from his(petitioner) appearance as abo ve. No costs.