IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23715 of 2011 Jeelani Idrisi son of late Murtza Ali, resident of village- Madwa, P.S.-Chhatarpur, Dist.-Palamau (Jharkhand) Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 2. 20.7.2011. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The case arises out of a complaint in which cognizance has been taken for the offence under sections 406, 420 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. As per the complaint, it is alleged that there was negotiation for marriage between the daughter of the complainant and the petitioner and a sum of Rs.1,35.000/- was given by the complainant to the petitioner and his family members but subsequently a demand of Rs.1,00,000/- was also made and, thus, due to non-fulfillment of said demand of additional amount, the marriage could not be performed. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the entire allegation is based on oral accusation and there is no documentary evidence to support the allegation of payment of any amount to the petitioner by the complainant. It is also submitted that though there was negotiation of marriage but for some or the other reasons negotiation failed and the present complaint has been instituted with oblique motive. Taking into consideration the aforesaid submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, let the petitioner, namely, Jeelani Idrisi in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of the 2 order be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Complaint Case No.30 of 2010. Md.S. ( Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)