In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CR No.4999 of 2007 Date of decision:01.10.2007. State Bank of India .... Petitioner. Versus Rajesh Sharma and another ... Respondents. Present: Mr.AK Khungar, Advocate, for the petitioner. -- PERMOD KOHLI, J. (Oral): This revision is directed against the order dated 11.09.2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandigarh, closing the evidence of the petitioner-plaintiff. From the impugned order, it appears that the Court has provided various opportunities and thereafter closed the evidence of the petitioner. I do not find any infirmity in the order impugned. -2- At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that one opportunity may be provided to the petitioner to produce its entire evidence. In the interest of justice, final opportunity is allowed to the petitioner to produce its entire evidence on a date to be fixed by the learned trial Court for the purpose. The petitioner is directed to appear before the learned trial Court on the date already fixed. The learned trial Court will fix a date for the evidence of the petitioner-plaintiff. No further adjournment shall be granted in any case. If the petitioner-plaintiff fails to produce its entire evidence on the date so fixed by the learned trial Court, impugned order shall operate. Revision petition is disposed of. 01.10.2007 (PERMOD KOHLI) BLS JUDGE