1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 104 OF 2005 Jagannath J. Phalke & Ors. .......... .....Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .....Respondents. Mr. S. A. Sawant for the Petitioners. Mr. P. M. Patil, AGP for the Respondents. CORAM: DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J. & S. J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATED : AUGUST 17, 2005. P.C. : Mr. Sawant, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners, states that he would be satisfied if this petition is considered as a comprehensive representation and decided by Respondent No.2, the Chief Secretary, Maharashtra State, Mantralaya, Mumbai after affording the Petitioners hearing by giving a reasoned order. In the fact and circumstances, we 2 direct the Respondent No.2 to treat this petition as a comprehensive representation of the Petitioners and decide the same as expeditously as possible and in any case within six weeks from the date of the receipt of this order after affording them hearing by a reasoned order. 2. No further directions are necessary. This petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.