IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI and THE HON'BLE SRI. JUSTICE S.ASHOK KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO :4563 of 2008 Between: 1 The Director , A.P.Police Academy, Hyderabad. 2 The Govt. Of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 The Chairman, State Level Police Recruitment Board, A.P. Hyderabad. 4 The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Hyderabad Range Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONERS AND G.Sanjeeva S/o. Ramulu R/o. Plot No. 17, Shivapuri Colony, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to and connected with the order passed by the Hon'ble A.P.Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.3518/2007 dated 14-12-2007 and to quash or set aside the same by holding as erroneous and contrary to law. Counsel for the Petitioner:GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondent : MR.P.NARASIMHA The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI. JUSTICE S.ASHOK KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO :4563 of 2008 ORDER: (Per the Honourable Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) This writ petition is filed by the petitioners seeking to set aside the order passed by the tribunal in O.A.No:3518 of 2007 on 14.12.2007. The petitioners herein are the respondents and the respondent herein is the applicant before the tribunal. Originally, the applicant has filed the O.A. seeking to declare that the applicant is entitled for appointment as Sub Inspector of Police without undergoing the BPR & D sandwich training or in the alternative the applicant is entitled for appointment by undergoing simple training or for appointment without in any equivalent rank post in the same department in view of the mistake committed by the respondents in not appointing him at the relevant point of time. The tribunal having observed that without going into the merits of the case, as the applicant has expressed his repentance for absconding from training due to ill health only and he undertakes to attend the training for the entire period of training and as the discharge order has not been issued to him pursuant to the recommendation of the Deputy Inspector General of Police, it is just and proper to direct the respondents to allow the applicant to participate in the training process for the entire period of training, without issuing the consequential discharge orders as they have not yet been issued, disposed of the O.A. Having aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is preferred by the respondents in the O.A. Heard the learned counsel and perused the entire material available on record as well as the order impugned. The fact that remains undisputed is that the applicant has expressed his repentance for absconding from the training due to ill health and he undertakes to attend the training for the entire period of training and apart from that, no discharge order has yet been served on the applicant. Under the above circumstances, the tribunal has thought it a fit case to direct the respondents to allow the applicant for the training without resorting to pass any discharge orders. At this stage, it is relevant to note that on 4.3.2008 on the submission made by the learned Counsel for the respondent-applicant that the applicant is ready to undergo for the training, the applicant has been directed to report to the authorities concerned expressing his willingness in writing to undergo training to be held for the next batch. Now, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the present training is quite different to that of Sub Inspector (Civil) and therefore, the learned Counsel for the respondent-applicant seeks a direction to the writ petitioners to permit the applicant to undergo the training of S.I. (Civil) in the next batch. In the present facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, We feel it a fit case wherein the respondents-writ petitioners can be directed to allow the applicant to undergo the training of S.I. (Civil) in the next ensuing batch. Subject to the above modification, this writ petition is closed. ___________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari ___________________ Justice S.Ashok Kumar Dated:25.3.2008 Gurc/nn THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI. JUSTICE S.ASHOK KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO :4563 of 2008 (Division Bench Order delivered by the Honourable Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari) 25/03/2008