ss^sss^ ^^ss?^s^s^? SS'fSStWSiiSISSS ^ss^ asssB® }<' y9" HIQH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.ISI N0. 7719/2007 PETITIONER Versus 2. 3. Tifaaruram Baajare, Son of Ramji Banjare, aged about 64 yeara, Retu-ed Teacher, Resident of Vitlage and Post Pod, Tahsil Abhanpur, Distnct Raipur (CG) The Accoimtaat General, Chliattisgarh, Raipur (CG) The Distdct Educatiou Officer, Raipur (CG) The Btock Education Officer, Abhanpur, district Raipur (CG) WRIT PETITION UMDBR ARTICLB 226 OF THE COMSTITUTION oy IWDIA (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Satish K. AanUiotd, J.l Shri M.K.Bhaduri, couasel for the petitioner. Shri U.N.S.Deo, Govemment Advocate for the State. QRAJ-ORDER (Passed oa this 3rd day of Jauuary 2008) Suguna Learaed couusel appeariag for the petitioner subimts that fhe petitioner does not waat to press ttus matter on merit except that fhe petitioner be granted permlssion to make a detaited representation to the respondent No. 1 for settling his retrial dues. 2. Learaed counsel appearing for (he State has no cfcjection. 3. The petition is accordiugly disinissed as not pressed with the Hberty to make a representation, if so advised. In (he event a representation is luade, the respondent No. 1 is directed to consider and pass appropriate order in accordance wifh law withiu a period of four weeks Irom the date of receipt of fhe representation. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge