Crl. Misc. No. M-17479 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-17479 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.8.2011 Buta Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Bhardwaj, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 7. Rajan Gupta, J (oral). This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking a direction for conducting a fair and impartial inquiry into the matter and to take action against respondents No.4 to 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the alleged occurrence, injuries were suffered by petitioner as is clear from MLR, Annexure P-2. Thus, an FIR is required to be registered. Learned counsel for respondents No.4 to 7 has relied upon judgment reported in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. and others, 2008 (1) R.C.R. 392 and submits that petitioner has an effective remedy by way of complaint or petition under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and given careful thought to the facts of the case. In view of the law laid down in Sakiri Vasu's case (supra), this court does not find it a fit case for interference in inherent Crl. Misc. No. M-17479 of 2011 2 jurisdiction of this court. Needless to observe that in case any cognizable offence is made out, effective remedy is available to the petitioner by way of complaint or petition under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. Dismissed. (RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE 11.8.2011 'rajpal'