S. B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 1586/2007 SRI RAM V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANOTHER. DATE OF ORDER: ::: 18/09/2008. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. M. TOTLA Mr. Rakesh Arora, for Petitioner (s). Mr. S.N.Tiwari, PP, for the State. Preferring this petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C., petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.71/07 registered against the petitioner at Police Station, Badnaur, for the offence of Section 91 (6) of the Land Revenue Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that (1) in favour of the petitioner and for this land, is “Patta” of the year, 1997, issued by the Gram Panchayat. (2) Mandatory notice, before proceeding under Section 91 (6) not given to the petitioner. (3) Other provisions of Section 91 are not followed which are mandatory before lodging of FIR. (4) The petitioner is in lawful occupation and respondent or any one if he is aggrieved, they ought to proceed for getting “Patta” cancelled. Learned Public Prosecutor contended that all these arguments are based on facts to be considered in investigation and only on strong apparent reasons, FIR can be quashed. In support of contention reliance placed on (i) 2006 Crl. L.J. 4045, State of Karnataka & Another v. Pastor P. Raju, & (ii) 2008 Crl. L.J. 2027, Central Bureau of Investigation v. K. M.Sharan. Considered. Perused Section 91 of the Land Revenue Act – it broadly prescribes procedure for eviction of a person alleged to be trespasser and also for punishing him. All above arguments are broadly based on facts to be considered and examined in investigation. More detailed examination of alleged facts is not desirable in such petition for invoking provisions of Section 482, Cr.P.C. Annexture 3 is the copy of notice given to appellant under Section 91 of the Land Revenue Act. Hence, petition is dismissed. (C. M. TOTLA), J. scd