^ c^ ^ IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.fStNo. FAf. /2010 PETITIONERS if .5^^'. ?.i^>" .co^' 3. ^ 4. ^" 5. ^ 6. ^" ^" 7. 8. /' SIINGtl BENCH Basant Kumar Dore, S/o- Tilak Ram Dore, aged about 33 years, R/o<- Bagharra, Post- Bagharra/ Teh.- Pandariya, Dist. Kabirdham (C.G.) Smt. Sarita Shrivastava, W/o. Shri Sanjay Kumar Shrivastava, Govt. Middle School, Sonpurirani, Block - Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) Ku.Padmini Sahu, posted at Govt. Middle School, Khapari, Block- Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.). Fatima Begum D/o. Saiyad Amjad, W/o. Mohd. Israel Qureshi, aged about 40 years, R/o. Radhakrishna Ward no. 17, Ekta Chowk, near Gas Agency, Kawardha, Distt.- Kabirdham Sadhram Banjare, Shiksha Karmi Grade- II, Govt. Middle School, Katgo, Block- Bodla, Distt.- Kabirdham, (C.G.) Ramawatar Baghel, S/o. Shri Niranjan Ram Baghel, Shiksha Karmi Grade- II, Govt. Middle School, Junwani, (Jangal), Block- Bodla, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) Sukhacharan S/o. Shri Jhumuklal, Aged about 43 years, VUlage- Bhuwalpur, P.0. Bagharra, Parhi, Tehsil- Pandaria Block- & Distt. Kabirdham, (C.G.) Ram Kumar Kaushik, S/o. Shri Pardeshi Kaushik, aged about 33 years, R/o. Village- Piparmati, P.0. Ruse, Tahsil- Pandaria, Distt. - Kabirdham (C.G.) ^^ ^' dD ^' lt': RESPONDENTS 9. Arvind Kumar Chandravanshi, S/o. Shri Dwarika Singh, Chandravanshi, Shiksha Karmi Grade- 02, Govt. Middle School, Majgaon, R/o. Village- Kosmanda, Post- Jhirauni, TahsU- Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) 10. Ramkumar Pandey, S/o. Shri Girish Chandra Pandey, Aged about 30 years, R/o. Darripara ward no. 19, School- Govt. High School, Bazar Charbhata, Distt. Kabirdham, (C.G.) VERSUS 1.^" 2. 3. «r" State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Education, D<K-S. Bhawan Mantrcdaya, Raipur (C.G.) Secretary, Department of Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) District Education Officer, Kawardha, Distt., Kabirdham (C.G.) WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^^s'%^. HIOH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIUUSPUR 8B : HON»BLB8HRI JU8TICB PmTINKER DFWAKBR & W.P.ISt N0. 6866/2010 PBTITIONBR8 RB8PONDBNT8 Versus Basaiit Kumar Dore & Ofhers State of C.G. & Others WRIT PBTITION UNDBR ARTICLB 226 OP THB CON8TITUTION OFSNDIA Shri Ravish Veniia^ counsel for fhe petitioners. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, G.A. for fhe State, QRDER (01.12.2010) Grievaace of tlie petitioners ia fhis petition is that mitially tliey were appoiated as Contract Teacher Grade aad tliereafter as Shiksha Karcai but they are not beiag permitted to appear for the post of Head Master on fhe ground that they do not have the experience of seven years as Shiksha Karmi 2. Counsel for the respondents/State subxmts that now the govertmient has taken a decision to permit aU those Shiksha Karmis who have fhe experience of seven years eifher on the post of Coxitract Teacher or on fhe post of Shiksha Karmi aad therefore, fhere remains nothing in the present petition, He has shown the letter dated 19,11.2010 issued by the Director, PubUc InstmctioBs, Raipur addressed to fhe Advocate General, Copy ofthe said tetter has been given to Shri Verma also and he is satisfied with the same. Counsel for fhe petitioners subxmts tiiat as fhe pefitioners apprehend that fhey xnay not be permitted to appear ia fhe examiaatioxi, a direction xaay be issued to fhe coinpetent aufhority to permit tiiem to appear ia the said exammiation. 3. State counsel submits fhat fhe appreheiision of the petitioners is ftrcmature aad ifthey have duly fiUed m fhe appUcatioii forms, fhe ^ ;? ^'•S.fis.. 1 \t <^.4:^^, ^ ^i^^^ ! authonty conceraed would act pursuant to fhe decision tafeen by fhe State Govemment vide letter dated 19.11.2010. 4, In the facts aad circumstances of fhe case, as nofhing survives ui fhe petition, it is disposed of with a direction to the competent aufhority to permit fhe petitioners to appear ia the exainiaation for the post of Head Master pursuant to fhe decision taken by the State Goveninient subject to fhe verification offhe fact fhat the petitioners have fiUed ia fheir fonas and fhe same have been duly accepted by fhe aufhority concenied, If ftxe grievaace of fhe petitioners stUl siiivives, ftiey would be at Mberty to approach fhis Court. -— Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ^ll^