IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Misc.No.M-23091 of 2011 DATE OF DECISION: August 02, 2011 Gurkirpal Singh …..Petitioner versus The State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.A.K. Khunger, Advocate for the petitioner .. RAJAN GUPTA, J.: (Oral) This is a petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to respondents No.1 to 4 to take action against respondents No.5 to 9 in view of enquiry report (Annexure P-2). Learned counsel submits that despite a detailed enquiry conducted by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Abohar and recommendation of Superintendent of Police to take suitable action, no further proceedings have followed. He submits that under the inherent jurisdiction of this court a direction needs to be issued to respondents No.1 to 4 to take legal action. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. From a perusal of report (Annexure P-2), it is not clear as to how the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Abohar was seized of the matter and whether he had any authority to conduct the enquiry on the complaint of Gurkirpal Singh. I am of the considered view that such an Crl.Misc.No.M-23091 of 2011 - 2 - enquiry report would have no value in the eyes of law. The present petition which relates to some property dispute is thus totally frivolous and deserves to be dismissed with heavy costs. However, this court is refraining from imposing costs at this stage as economic status of the petitioner is not known. Dismissed. The petitioner will, however, be at liberty to avail of alternative remedy, if any, available to him. August 02, 2011 ( RAJAN GUPTA ) pc JUDGE 2