HIGHCOURrOR<»fl-Mffl"'nS<SftM^ffi«USI>UR Sin^Bench : Hott'W^Slui®iUl^Ra<Mah^fl^Mi(uttte^ Aooellante RespondentB MA(CtNo.'t487dfaW 7:1. Mumteu. aged about 50 yeare S/o Mohd.nabBMusSlman, 2. Smt. Rtoina KWtun, aoed 46 ysus, WtoShriMuntej. BoUt Rfo VWIaga Vmlcatna®ar, P.S. JaBhiMV TahsX AnuF^KU, D&lrict Ainuppur<M.P.) ; veraus :. • • •' : ; 1. Smt. Ksfe^ Eteia^^^^^^^^^^^^!^^ ' NErthtrttfKUn.R/oVataga&PcistRa^nal, Tahsit 3'ium^ Distnet 2. 9h^adr Birtiadur, Sto NEtfhi^^ :^^||^SSB<^R<TOna^Tyis8^Tiandala,. E^*<ct»cJabsKjflW.P.) 3. The N^ ItKlia Insura^^ Uma^;N^C» »-^M^J%it^ Forte, B- Mumbai fl4aharastrtra^ Mi«ienaneousAt>Dffirij»ttetSeca^}73jOt,th&ll<torVeMcte8Act Present:- Shri Rsitce^i ^ihu, ctwmsel fortfi^appellEnts. l,: <Passed 6n thi»1C^daytrf July,2008) Heardonachmssion. 2) The appellants prefernd ^ appeal ^^^^^ ^ t»mpen^k>nbeingi^®rie^^an^^ A(klitiona( M(^ Acciclente <^inre TrNw^ Klaspur ^ienccftwth "the 1<fcuria^Weiaim <^ise No^aiXIS^hWietQf 8i the case of awktertat death of one Waqar Ahmed, the Tribunal has awarcted compensatron of Rs.2,83,500/-. 3) Jhe sote ground uiged by the tesffned counsel for the swellants in thfe appeal fe that the TrBaunal has erred in takng monttify income of the deceased at Rs.3,000/- per month in view of the oral evidence adduced by the claimants whfch reveals that the deceased had a shoe centre in the name of Taj Shoe Centre m VHtage Venkatnagar srtifch was a gram pancha^t. It was ateo uiged that the Triburail ouglht to have ass^sed th®monthly income of the deceased at Rs.4,000/- per month. ^to other ground was uiged. 4) 1-teving heard the teamed coimsel for the appeltants/claimants, 1 have perused ttw mpugned award. In para 20, the Tribunat has givwi cogent reasons for disbelieving the oral evktence ted by the appellants/clafmants. The Traiunal has in para 24, rigrtly assessed the monttily income of the deceased at Rs.3,00<y-. 1 am of the consklered opinfon that ftere is no ground tbr enhancement of compensation. (5) In the result, ftere is no merit m this appeal whidi is accordingly dismissedatthestageofadmBsion. - g^. Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh < Judge