THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.8851 OF 2010 ORDER: The petitioner is aggrieved by the seizure of the vehicle by the 2nd respondent herein. It is his case that, on the ground that the vehicle had met with an accident, the 2nd respondent had seized the vehicle and, despite an application being made, the vehicle was not being released. Learned Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings, on instructions, would submit that the vehicle has been kept in safe custody with the 3rd respondent and the vehicle has, in fact, been seized by the 2nd respondent herein. I consider it appropriate, in such circumstances, to permit the petitioner to make an application under Rule 448(B) of the A.P. Motor Vehicles Rules to the 1st respondent within a period of one week from today. On such application being made, the 1st respondent shall consider the application, in accordance with law, and pass orders thereupon for release of the vehicle in question within three days from the date of receipt of the said application. The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. ____________________________ Date: 26.04.2010 RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J Note: Issue copy by 29.04.2010. B/o MRKR