IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1436 of 2009 1. ARTI SINHA W/O SHRI A. K. SINHA R/O MOHALLA- KASHIPUR TAJPUR ROAD, P.S.- SAMASTIPUR, DISTT.- SAMASTIPUR. ---------- Petitioner/Appellant Versus 1. THE RAJENDRA AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY, PUSA REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS VICE-CHANCELLOR, RAJENDRA AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY, PUSA, SAMASTIPUR 2. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR RAJENDRA AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY, PUSA, SAMASTIPUR, BIHAR 3. THE REGISTRAR RAJENDRA AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY, PUSA, SAMASTIPUR, BIHAR, P.O.- PUSA, SAMASTIPUR 4. THE DEAN, HOME SCIENCE RAJENDRA AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY, PUSA, SAMASTIPUR, BIHAR, PUSA, SAMASTIPUR 5. THE DIRECTOR, ADMINISTRATION / DRI-CUM-DEAN (PG) RAJENDRA AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY, PUSA, SAMASTIPUR. ------------ Respondents/Respondents ----------- 5 19.01.2011 Having heard learned counsel for the parties as also taking into account that there was no stipulation of payment of salary for the period the appellant writ petitioner had undergone the M.Phil. course, this Court would find that the conclusion arrived by the learned single Judge while dismissing the writ petition does not suffer from any error. Consequently, the writ petition has been correctly dismissed by the learned single Judge wherein the solitary relief prayed therein was only for payment of salary for the period the appellant writ petitioner had undergone M.Phil. course. Mr. Shri Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel 2 appearing on behalf of the appellant writ petitioner very fairly submits that of course, there was no order in favour of the appellant writ petitioner under which the University had undertaken the liability for payment of salary for the period she had undergone the M.Phil. Course but then the Dean of the University had later on made recommendation for payment of salary of the petitioner for the period she had undergone M. Phil Course. We however find that even the recommendation of the Dean in favour of the appellant writ petitioner while allowing her to join the M. Phil Course was only as a self-supporting candidate. Once this aspect becomes clear, the grievance of the appellant writ petitioner for non-payment of salary for the period of her M. Phil Course was definitely unjustified. That being so, we would find no merit in this appeal and, accordingly, the same is dismissed. Kanchan/rishi (T. Meena Kumari, J.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)