hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1950 OF 2011 Satish Jamnadas Dattani and Ors. ... Petitioners Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. D.H. Mehta i/by M/s. D.M. Legal & Associates for petitioners. Ms. P.A. Purandare for respondent M.C.G.M. CORAM : P.B. MAJMUDAR & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 19, , 2011 P.C. Since the Corporation has already decided the representation of the shop owners by which the Corporation has upheld the notice under section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, now it is for the petitioner to act in pursuance of the notice issued by the Corporation and the Corporation has no role now to play by which they can assist the petitioner in repairing the structure. It is for the petitioner to repair the structure in accordance with the law and for which Corporation cannot be directed to give any assistance to the petitioner. In view of the same, no relief can be given except asking the petitioner to act as per the notice of the Corporation under section 354. With the above observations, Petition stands disposed of. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (P.B. MAJMUDAR,J)