Crl. Misc. No.M-27719 of 2010 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-27719 of 2010 Date of Decision: September 20, 2010 Balwinder Singh …..Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.R.S. Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioner claims that he has got a dispute with his wife- respondent No.4, who has turned him out of the matrimonial house. The petitioner had on earlier occasion, approached this Court and vide order dated August 11, 2010, a direction was given that the grievance of the petitioner shall be looked into by SSP, Khanna and appropriate action would be taken. Crl. Misc. No.M-27719 of 2010 [2] Petitioner has filed this second petition for protection of his life, liberty and property at the hands of private respondents No.5 to 11 claiming that with the connivance of the said respondents with his wife respondent No.4-Kulwinder Kaur, the petitioner has got a threat to his life and property. He claims that no action has been taken despite the orders passed by High Court on August 11, 2010. He claims that he had filed a representation to the SSP, Khanna, for providing protection of life, liberty and property at the hands of respondents No.4 to 11. I have gone through the averments in the representation annexure P-1, wherein the petitioner has mentioned that he and his brother have been falsely implicated in proceedings under Section 107/151 Cr.P.C. by the police of Payal. Prima facie I am not satisfied with the extent of threat perception to the petitioner, which would warrant a direction from this Court. The matter seems to have arisen out of the matrimonial discord. No ground is made out for issuance of any direction. However, a direction is issued to the SSP, Khanna, to comply with the directions passed by this Court on August 11, 2010 in Crl.Misc. No. 23134 of 2010 (Balwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others), within a period of two months. Disposed of. The petitioner will be at liberty to avail any other legal remedies available to him against his wife and the private respondents who are allegedly conniving with his wife. September 20, 2010 (M.M.S.BEDI) sanjay JUDGE Crl. Misc. No.M-27719 of 2010 [3]