1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.1126/2008 (Sukh Lal alias Sukha Vs. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : March 12, 2008 HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.Pankaj Sharma, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the petitioner and the similarly situated co-accused Gajraj Singh and Govind have been released on bail by this Court vide order dt. 27.2.2008 and the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from that of co- accused. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the case of the present petitioner is similar to that of co-accused Gajraj Singh and Govind, without commenting on the merit of the case, I consider it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 2 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Sukh Lal alias Sukha s/o Pooja Ji Bhagora be released on bail in FIR No.311/2007, P.S. Railmagra, Distt. Rajsamand provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-