ssm sm sm IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL CIVIL CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT WRIT WRIT PETITION NO.4032 OF PETITION NO.4032 OF PETITION NO.4032 OF 1986 1986 1986 Bapu Dagdu Khore ...Petitioner. Vs. Jagannath Balu Khore & Ors. ...Respondents. Mr.P.K.Hushing for the Petitioner. Mr.S.G.Deshmukh for the Respondents. CORAM CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED DATED DATED : 31st March, 2008 : 31st March, 2008 : 31st March, 2008 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- . Pursuant to the order dated 4th March, 2008 as the Petitioner failed to comply with the court’s order, the Writ Petition No.4032 of 1986 stands dismissed for want of prosecution against the contesting Respondent No.1A, 1B and 1C. 2. The Second Appeal No.571 of 1987 in question is between the same parties and are inter-connected, with regard to the declaration of the tenancy right in respect of the suit land. As the Writ Petition itself is disposed of for want of prosecution nothing survives in this Second Appeal and accordingly not pressed by the counsel of Appellant also. ( 2 ) 3. The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant also makes a statement that he has no instructions from his client till this date inspite of repeated communication. 4. Both the matters are already tagged together. In this background, the Writ Petition as well as Second Appeal are dismissed for want of prosecution. [ANOOP [ANOOP [ANOOP V. V. V. MOHTA, J.] MOHTA, J.] MOHTA, J.]