1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.12.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN Writ Petition (MD) Nos.14017 and 14018 of 2011 M.Muruganantham .. Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.14017 of 2011 G.Selvam .. Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.14018 of 2011 Vs. Divisional Engineer (H), NABARD and Rural Road, Paramakudi, Ramanathapruam District. .. Respondent in the above Writ Petitions Writ Petition (MD)No.14017 of 2011 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to issue the tender schedule for the works scheduled in the tender notification No.O.A.No.11/2010-2011/Va.A., dated 21.11.2011 under item number 3 and 6 on the file of the respondent herein. Writ Petition (MD)No.14018 of 2011 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to issue the tender schedule for the works scheduled in the tender notification No.O.A.No.11/2010-2011/Va.A., dated 21.11.2011 under item numbers 1, 2, 3 and 5 on the file of the respondent herein. For Petitioners : Mr.K.R.Laxman For respondent : Mr.K.P. Krishna Doss, Government Advocate ORDER The petitioners have come up with the above Writ Petitions seeking a Mandamus to direct the respondent to issue Tender Schedule for the works, for which, a Notification was issued on 21.11.2011. 2. Heard Mr.K.R.Laxman, learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. Mr.K.P.Krishna Doss, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondent. 4. The respondent has issued a Tender Notification on 21.11.2011 inviting sealed tenders in respect of the four items of works. According to the petitioners, they took Demand Drafts and sought Tender Schedules but they have not been granted. 5. Copies of the Demand Drafts and the representations made by the petitioners are filed. There can be no impediment for issuing the tender schedules to the petitioners. The consideration of the tenders submitted by the petitioners may depend upon several qualifications. But, they cannot be denied Tender Schedules even at the threshold. As a matter of fact, the respondent has not denied Tender Schedules so far. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 6. Therefore, both the Writ Petitions are disposed of directing the respondent to issue the Tender Schedule to the petitioners after receiving the Demand Drafts sent by them. SD ASST REGISTRAR ( RTI Act ) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST REGISTRAR asvm To The Divisional Engineer (H), NABARD and Rural Road, Paramakudi, Ramanathapruam District. 2CC TO MR. K.R. LAXMAN, ADVOCATE ON PAYMENT ON CHARGES: SR: 43103, 43104: DM:2011:DEC:10:: W.P.(MD) Nos.14017 and 14018 of 2011 09.12.2011 2P:4C:: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/