HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT‘BILASPUR DlVISiON BENCH HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, G.J. HON’BLE $HR! RANGNATH CHANDRAKARJ CORAM: NLA. No. S1? of 2003 1. Smt Roshan Bai W/o Kamal Narayan Yadav aged about 35 years 2. Ku Pratima S/o Kama: arayan Yadav, aged about 15 yrs 3. Rakesh Kumar S/o Kama! Narayan Yadav, aged about 13 yrs 4. Ku Ranjeeta Dlo Kamal‘Narayan-Yadav, aged about 11 yrs 5. Chandrashekhar, S/o Kamal Narayan Yadav, aged about 8 yrs 6. Ratiram Yadav S/o Late Vindhyachal Yadav aged about 68 years Appeltants No.2, 3, 4 & 5 are represented here by 1ega1 guardian mother Roshan Bai All are Rio Vin Gandhi Nagar (Nakta) Tah and Distt Raipur Versus Respondents 1.; Rakesh Kumar Slo Gutjari Lal Mahra G/o Non-appncants Chhattr Singh Sio Babu Sinh Kamboj Road Career Heerapur Raipur Thana Aamanaka; Diét't Raipur (CG} 2 Chhatti ngh, sio Babu Singh Clo Kamboj, Road Career, Heerapur Ralpur (CG) 3 National Insurance Co. Ltd., C/o 3tate Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd., GE Raod, Raipur, Distt Raipur (CG) N Si v 2"?“‘l Miscellaneous Appeal uls173 cf tm Mom Whims Am. 19w Present : Shri SC Verma, Advocate forthe appeilants. Shri Aditya Sharma. counsel for respondent No.3. ,m ORDER (16m June, 2010) “The fonowing order of the Gourt was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Shri SC Verma, Advocate pleads no instructions from the appellants. 2) In this View of the matter, the appeal is dismissed for want of: prosecution. /\ ‘ , SM . 5R.N. Chandia'kar Judge Sd/— Chief Justice l: l "‘\ l l