BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16664 of 2011 1 MARIAMMAL 2 KUMARATHI 3 VEERAPPAN 4 CHINNAIAH ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 35 TO 38 Vs STATE REP BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE SANARPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT CRIME NO. 633/2011 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. V.BASKARAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who are the accused Nos.35 to 38 in Crime No.633 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 188, 324, 344, 448 , 294(b) and 506(ii) of I.P.C. and Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act, apprehending arrest, at the hands of the respondent police, are before this Court seeking anticipatory bail. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.According to the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners, due to election motive, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in his argument that the petitioners abused the de facto complainant by using abusive language and they caused damage to a bus to the tune of Rs.20,000/- and there are totally 38 accused in this case. He would further submit that if for any reasons, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, stringent conditions may be imposed for their secured presence. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Considering the submissions made by both sides, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with some stringent conditions: 6.i) Accordingly, each of the petitioner is directed to deposit Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred only) in the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.III, Dindigul to the credit of Cr.No.633 of 2011 ii) On such deposit, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul , on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerend and on further conditions iii) That the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders iv) The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously and on further condition that v) The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 20/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III, DINDIGUL 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBILC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE SANARPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. V.BASKARAN Advocate SR.No.44596 rl/6 c- 22.12.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16664 of 2011 Date :20/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/