IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No.: 12374 of 2008. Decided on: 05.07.2011. _______________________________________________ Prem Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. … Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Narinder Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate vice Mr. Dilip Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. Rajiv Sharma, Judge (oral). In a case on the same or similar facts, a coordinate Bench of this Court has rendered the judgment in Deepak Gautam Versus State of H.P. and others, CWP-T No.3062 of 2008, decided on 28.9.2010. The learned single Judge has disposed of the petition directing the respondents that as and when there is a vacancy for driver, the petitioner shall be given due 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. - 2 - weightage in the selection and in case he satisfies the eligibility conditions, he shall be considered for being appointed. 2. Consequently, this petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered by the coordinate Bench of this Court, dated 28.9.2010, cited hereinabove, with a direction to the respondents that as and when there is a vacancy, the petitioner shall be given due weightage in the selection and in case he satisfies the eligibility conditions, he shall be considered for being appointed. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma), Judge. July 05, 2011. (sck).