IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 11032 of 2005 Between: 1 Mothey Chinna Gandadhar Goud S/o. Chinna Narsa Goud All are R/o. Devanpally Village, Kamareddy Mandal, Nizamabad District. 2 Mogulla Venkateswar Goud S/o. Laxminarayana Goud 3 Ranga Ramesh Goud S/o. Raja Goud 4 Karre Venkateswar Goud S/o. Linga Goud 5 Lachigari Srinivas Goud S/o. Narsa Goud 6 Mothey Rama Goud, S/o.Ganga Goud 7 Mothey Bala Krishna Goud S/o. Bala Goud All are R/o. Devanpally Village, Kamareddy Mandal, Nizamabad District. ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Commissioner of Proh. & Excise, Government of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Nizamabad District at Nizamabad. 3 The Proh. & Excise Superintendent, Nizamabad District at Nizamabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation dt. 27-4-2005 of the petitioners and reports dt. 16-9-2004 and 18-9-2004 of the Proh. & Excise Inspector, Kamareddy and SDPED, Kamareddy respectively for granting of TFT licence at Devanpally Village, Kamareddy Mandal, Nizamabad District as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law, against principles of natural justice and further direct the respondents to consider the representation dt. 27-4-2005 of the petitioners in the light of the reports dt. 16-9-2004 and 18-9-2004 of the Proh. & Excise Inspector, Kamareddy and SDPED, Kamareddy respectively for granting of TFT licence at Devanpally Village, Kamareddy Mandal, Nizamabad District and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.T. AMARNATH GOUD THODUPUNURI Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court at the stage of admission made the following : O R D E R The petitioners are said to be toddy tappers. They approached this court through this writ petition to direct the respondents to grant T.F.T. licence by considering their representation dated 27.4.2005. 2 . Since the petitioners have already made representation to the concerned authorities, they cannot simultaneously maintain the present writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. 3 . It is for the respondents to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioners dated 27.4.2005 regarding their request for granting of T.F.T. licence. AVS/STP ------------------------- 10.05.2005 ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Commissioner of Proh. & Excise, Government of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Nizamabad District at Nizamabad. 3 The Proh. & Excise Superintendent, Nizamabad District at Nizamabad. 4 . 2 CCs GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE, High Court of A.P. Buildings (out). 5. 2 CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}