[ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION APPLICATION APPLICATION NO. 755 OF 2007 NO. 755 OF 2007 NO. 755 OF 2007. ASHOK SUDAM DHONDGE ... APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OFMAHARASHTRA ... RESPONDENT. MR. S.A.DHAMKE FOR THE APPELLANT. MR. P.S.HINGORANI APP FOR THE RESPONDENT-STATE. CORAM CORAM CORAM : : : SRI R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND SRI R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND SRI R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND SRI SRI SRI A.A. A.A. A.A. SAYED, JJ. SAYED, JJ. SAYED, JJ. DATE DATE DATE : January 18, 2008. : January 18, 2008. : January 18, 2008. P.C. 1. Heard. 2. The medical evidence alongwith other evidence on record, which has been relied upon by the trial Court disclose that the wife of the applicant died on account of throttling and that there were attempts made by the applicant to show as if she had consumed the poison though the injuries were found on the body of the appellant as well as on the body of the deceased and it was the case of the prosecution that such injuries can be caused at the time of scuffle. No [ 2 ] further explanation has been given by the appellant-accused regarding the injuries caused to his body. Considering the involvement of the appellant-accused in the offence, we are of the considered opinion that there is no case made out for grant of the bail at this stage. Hence, the application for bail stands rejected. [R.M.S.Khandeparkar,J.] [R.M.S.Khandeparkar,J.] [R.M.S.Khandeparkar,J.] [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, [A.A.Sayed, J.] J.] J.]