1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application No. 3943/2008 (Chatrapati Zibalji Dhanjode VERSUS Shobha Pandurang Dahake & another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Shri S.V. Sohoni, counsel for the appellant. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J. DATE : AUGUST 7, 2008. Heard Shri Sohoni, the learned counsel for the applicant. None appears on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2, though served. The respondents have filed a reply to the civil application. I have perused the contents of the civil application as also the reply filed thereto. Certain documents are placed on record to show that the applicant, in fact, was suffering from heart ailment during the pendency of the suit, and therefore, had not attended the suit proceedings and was not aware of the decision passed in the suit. It appears from the perusal of the application that the delay caused in filing the appeal is not intentional but, is bona fide. In this view of the matter, the prayer made in the civil application is granted. The civil application is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE APTE