IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20623 of 2011 Pappu Thakur S/o Mahadeo Thakur, R/o Village-Satwariya, P.S. Sathi, District- West Champaran. --Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar --Opp.Party 2 15.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is one of the named accused in this Case with allegation of withdrawing the money from Bank by impersonating the complainant through another lady. However, it is pointed out that parties have already entered into compromise. Now, the informant has received the amount and no longer intends to continue with the case. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor specifically pointed out contents of the paragraph 2 of the compromise petition and submits that under some confusion this compromise petition appears to have been filed. Considering the facts and circumstances, subject to the informant appearing as a witness before the court below with some documentary evidence of her identification and further fully understanding the contents and implication 2 specially of paragraph 2, accepts factum of compromise, the petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks of communication of the order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, at West Champaran, in Sathi P.S. Case no. 110 of 2009, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition that the petitioner shall remain present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates without any reasonable explanation the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. A.Ahmad ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)