IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 24981 of 2006 Between: Abdul Razack S/o. Late Abdul Aziz Income Tax Appellate Tribunal H.No. 6-3-629/1, Ravindernagar Colony, Khairtabad, Hyderabad 500 004 ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Sri T.K. Vishwanathan Former Secretary, Law Commission of India, New Delhi-110001. 2 Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Legal Affairs, A- Wing, New Delhi-110001. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of CERTIORARI or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the impugned order dt. 6-9-2006 in OA No. 184 of 2004 and the impugned order dt. 9-10-2006 in R.A.No. 22 of 2006 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad and pass such other and further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.SRINIVASA RAO MADIRAJU Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU Writ Petition No.24981 of 2006 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ petition is filed seeking to quash the order dated 06- 09-2006 in O.A.No.184 of 2004 and the order dated 09-10-2006 in R.A.No.22 of 2006 on the file of Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. 2. The above O.A. has been filed by the petitioner challenging the enquiry report and the O.A. was dismissed as premature. It is now represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that a final order has been passed imposing the punishment of 10% cut in the pension and the same is challenged by way of another O.A. 3. In the above circumstances, this writ petition becomes infructuous. However, this order does not preclude the petitioner from raising the grounds urged in this writ petition even if they are answered by Tribunal earlier. The Tribunal shall consider the O.A. on its own merits and dispose of the same in accordance with law. 4. The writ petition is therefore closed. No costs. __________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J. ___________________ C.V.RAMULU, J. 03-07-2008 bsc ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}