1 fa-1609.10 Ash IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1609 OF 2010 Gnaneshwar Chandulal Patel .. Appellant Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr. .. Respondents -- Shri S.K. Pise for the Appellant. Shri J.J. Xavier for Respondent No.1. Shri Vishal Kanade i/by Leroya Collaco & Associates for Respondent No.2. -- CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 17TH JANUARY, 2011 P.C: . Learned counsel appearing for the Appellant states that he is not pressing the appeal on merits. However, he prays that the Appellant may be permitted to apply for regularization. Heard learned counsel appearing for the 1st as well as 2nd Respondent. Request is reasonable and deserves to be accepted. Hence, I pass the following order. ORDER (i) Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. (ii) If the Application as prescribed by Rules is made by the Appellant to the Executive Engineer ( Building 2 fa-1609.10 Proposals ), Western Suburbs, Bandra, Mumbai, for regularization of the suit structure within a period of six weeks from today, the same shall be decided by the concerned officer within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the Application. All issues as regards regularization application are kept open. (iii) For a period of 18 weeks from today, the parties will maintain status quo as of today in respect of the disputed structure. (iv) It is made clear that if the Appellant fails to apply for regularization to the aforesaid officer within the period of six weeks from today, it will be open for the 1st Respondent to take action of demolition. (v) The order passed on the application for regularization shall be communicated to the Appellant and/or to his Architect within a period of one week from the date on which the order is passed. (A.S.OKA, J)