Qiii||je afc§i^<n C ' 5- .(06 (, BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l WRIT PETITION (Cl N0. '^3^ 3 /2011 PETITIONER^/s^ ^•^y"^' >^'. 'b^0' ^' ^•••"y..^\'\^ ^•"" ^" ..••'' iy>... ^v" RESPONDENTS .€-^^;:?'X '^ ^gi ^y Rajesh Singhania, S/o. Shri Gopi Ram Singhania, Aged about 40 years, R/o Lailunga, District, Raigarh (C.G.). VERSUS A. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary Revenue Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) 2.NagarPanchayat, Lailunga, District - Raigarh, (C.G.) 3. Collector, Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILA8PUR WRTT PETmON (0 No. 7329 of2011 PETmONER RE8PONDENT8 Rajesh Singhania. VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTmmON OF INDIA SB: HonlUteShnSattsh K. Asmhotri, J. Present: Shri Sourabh Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Shashank Thakur, Paiiel Lawyer for the State/respondent No. 1 and 3. Shri Amn Sao, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. ORDER (Passed on 07ttl day ofDecember, 2011) 1. Leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits fhat the impugned notice dated 25.11.2011 (Annexure P/l); for demolition of fhe alleged unauthorized constmction raised by fhe petitioner, has been withdrawn by the respondent authorities. Thus, nofhing survives for adjudication and this petition has become infiuctuous. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for other side do not controvert the above submission. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infiiictuous. — Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Amit