1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 29th Day of July, 2010. Ist Bail Application No. 663 of 2010 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Pravesh Kumar S/o Shri Ram Pal Singh R/o Village Badavad, Tehsil Baraut District Baghpat (U.P.) ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand …….Opposite Party _______________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 01 of 2009 Under Section : 498,366,376, 313, 344, & 120B of I.P.C. Police Station : Patwari Chauki Darshan, Tehsil Barkot District : Uttarakashi _______________________________________________ Hon’ble Prafulla C.Pant,J. Ms. Neelima Mishra, Advocate, Holding Brief of Shri Ramji Srivastava, Advocate, present for the applicant. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, Present for the State. Applicant Pravesh Kumar, who is in jail in connection with Case Crime No. 01 of 2009, relating to offence punishable Under Section 498, 366, 376, 313, 344, 120B of I.P.C., Police Station Patwari Chauki Darsaun, Tehsil Barkot, District Uttarkashi, has sought his release on bail. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2 Applicant was earlier directed his release on bail during trial. After his release, he could not appear in the court on 12.03.2010. Consequently warrants of arrest were issued against him by the trial court and he was again taken into custody in April 2010. Since then he is in jail. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that since applicant due to unavoidable reasons could not come to the court on 12.03.2010 and his counsel also could not move an application for exemption from personal appearance, the applicant was taken into custody. Considering the explanation given in the affidavits filed with the bail application, this court is of the view that applicant deserves bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Pravesh Kumar be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Uttarkashi. It is further provided that if adjournment is sought on behalf of the applicant on the date the witnesses are present in the court, this bail order shall automatically stands cancelled. (The Urgency Application 3216 of 2010 also stands disposed of). (Prafulla. C.Pant., J) Dt. 29.07.2010 NP