/ c^'^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P^NO.<2>5^S/2003 ^ PETITIONER : Ram Kamar Salame^ Son of 5hri BaJ^^xrara Salame^ aged about 36^years, At/P^Oo s Dongargaon, Tahsil s Dongargaon^ Distt : Rajnandgaon ( C G 5 VER S U S RESPONDENTS ^^^ $ l^ State o£ Chhattisgarh through the Secretary^ School lEducation Department, D^K^S^ iBuilding, Kantralaya,| Raipur^ Distt $ Raipar ( C G ) 2, The DisLtrict Education Officeir^ Rajnandgaon^ Distt s Rajnandgaon ( C G ) A^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227/0F THE CONSTITUTION OP INDIA r XI-HC-22 ^n^i'^T ^Jch 3Tit?T $b*il<=t> ^I '3^? ^MH^, ^<l^<o, iQ!<3lwi< © ^I+ICTI $h*<icft 3^?T ^S^S i ..3..a.?22^^ •^ 200 •I^^T' 3TI^['^iTW^rftcT 13.02.2004 p^ssed Petitioner by Miss Prifha| Shri Raabir Singh, Respondeuts, The raaia challenge in dated 17.7.2003 the petitioner) ffae Chhattisgai'h Civil Service^ Rules, 1966 on fhe ground tha|b under section 306 offh.e Indiaib. judgmcnt dated 5.7.2003 arrcsted on 5.7.2003. The ^t Teacher ia tlie Priniarv Schob Rajaandgaon, Leamed couiisejl $entence of conviction awarded suspended by tliis Court vid| Crimmal Appeal No. 730/20p3 ser^ice should be revoked. There is no provision suspension froni service on conviction awaj'ded by fhe appeal. More over the petition^r Rule 23(3) of the Rules, alteniative aad efficacious redressal of his grievance by Autliority, However, it is niad^ ^l^id^il'i *i{H^S^^S <F3i^i< it? 3<{^tH 3?n^T Ghoshal, Advocate, Advocate on behalf of fhe Otovt this writ petition is that vide order has been suspended under Rule 9 of (Classi&cation, Control aad Appeal) petitioner was accused ia aa offence Penal Code aad ia. conipliance of fhe in S.T.No, 38/2002 he was rtitioaer was ¥7orkmg as Assistaat 4 Bijapar, Block Churia, District - for tlie pctitioner submits that fhe by the todal Court has already been order dated 11,7,2003 passed m ^ therefore the suspension from utider tkial 4r fhe Rules for revocation of fhe fhe ground fhat flie sentence of Coiut has been suspended in has a right to file aa appeal under Therefore the petitioner has available uuder the law for fJLlmg aa appeal before fhe conipetent clear that if the petitioner files aii 1)966. r^niedy 1-+- ^^ XI-HC-22 ^si ^WM^, ^Til^Ko, fa<nw^< H1^^8 3ii^?r 'q^? wto-w^'.^^. "fa^T" ••^ 209^ STIct^T'^T r<w^ ^nt^i st>*fi<ft ^f^a 3^1I^?T/^(TW yt^a <^l<<(<vt<Iln 'WRff ^ 'fe^t ^^K ^N^P?3:fl^?[ ~^9J\^ ifiay appeal withia a period of 30 d^S appeal uiider fhe Rules, 1966 In view of fhe above otder llbcrty to the petitioncr aforcsai^ C/ertified copy, as per lys from today the timitation in fiUng not coiae in his way. fhe petition is disniissed wifh 1. Rulfcs Sd/- L.C. Bhadoo Judge •o^