: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.200 OF 2006 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1809 OF 2005 IN SUIT NO.721 OF 2005 Gurukripa Appliances & Anr. ....Appellants V/s. Cello Plastic Industrial Works & Anr. ....Respondents Mr.Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate, Mr.Sharan Jagtiani and Mr.Sagar Diwekar i/b M/s.Wadia Gandhy & Co. for the Appellants. Dr.Virendra V. Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate with Mr.Virag V. Tulzapurkar and Mr.Ramesh Gajria i/b M/s.Gajria for the Respondents. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 3RD APRIL, 2006. P.C. : 1. Heard the learned Senior Advocate for the Appellants and the learned Senior Advocate for the Respondents. 2. By this Appeal, the Appellants are challenging the order dated 14.2.2006 passed by the learned single Judge in the Notice of Motion No.1809 of 2005 whereby the Appellants had sought vacation of an ad-interim order granted on 19.7.2005, in the aforesaid Notice of Motion. : 2 : 3. We had perused the impugned order. There is no dispute that the Appellants had received the papers and proceedings including the copy of ad-interim order dated 19.7.2005 and were fully aware of the aforesaid ad-interim order from August, 2005 and whereas an application for vacating the said ad-interim order appears to have been made only in the month of February, 2006. 4. We have perused the reasonings of the learned single Judge refusing to vacate the ad-interim order. We do not find any error in the same. The Appeal is totally devoid of merits. However, having regards to the facts and circumstances of this case, we request the learned single Judge to expeditiously hear and dispose of the Notice of Motion No.1809 of 2005. 5. The Appeal stands disposed of. (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)