( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD. (1) WRIT PETITION NO. 4092 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Kondiba s/o. Hussaini Somwanshi, Aged : 37 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. D.R. Korde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ( 2 ) ........................ WITH (2) WRIT PETITION NO. 4093 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Rajendra s/o. Namdeo Sawant, Aged : 33 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. D.R. Korde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ( 3 ) ........................ WITH (3) WRIT PETITION NO. 4095 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Narayan s/o. Vishwanath Sabne, Aged : 31 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. D.R. Korde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 4 ) WITH (4) WRIT PETITION NO. 4096 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Syed Moinuddin s/o. Mehboob Sahab, Aged : 30 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. D.R. Korde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 5 ) WITH (5) WRIT PETITION NO. 4097 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Ram s/o. Malba Surnar, Aged : 33 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Respondent no.1 served (Absent). Mr. D.R. Korde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ WITH ( 6 ) (6) WRIT PETITION NO. 4098 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Pandu s/o. Shripati Apte, Aged : 34 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. D.R. Korde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ WITH ( 7 ) (7) WRIT PETITION NO. 4099 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Shivdas s/o. Sangram Bharkule, Aged : 37 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. D.R. Korde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ WITH ( 8 ) (8) WRIT PETITION NO. 4100 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Kantu s/o. Mohan Rangwal, Aged : 32 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 9 ) WITH (9) WRIT PETITION NO. 4101 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Akhil s/o. Yasin Shaikh, Aged : 30 years, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 10 ) WITH (10) WRIT PETITION NO. 4102 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Devidas s/o. Piraji, Aged : 37 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Respondent no.1 served (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ WITH ( 11 ) (11) WRIT PETITION NO. 4103 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Maruti s/o. Pundlik, Aged : 35 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ WITH ( 12 ) (12) WRIT PETITION NO. 4104 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Sitaram s/o. Sambhaji Thorat, Aged : 31 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Respondent no.1 served (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ WITH ( 13 ) (13) WRIT PETITION NO. 4105 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Vishwanath s/o. Hanmant Teleng, Aged : 30 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Shend, Udgir. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 14 ) WITH (14) WRIT PETITION NO. 4106 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Bhaurao s/o. Rawaji, Aged : 36 years, R/o. Udgir, Dist. : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Respondent no.1 served (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 15 ) WITH (15) WRIT PETITION NO. 4107 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Narsingh s/o. Nivrutti Somwanshi, Aged : 41 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, Dist. : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 16 ) WITH (16) WRIT PETITION NO. 4108 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Gorakh s/o. Yamnaji Somwanshi, Aged : 31 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Madlepur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 17 ) WITH (17) WRIT PETITION NO. 4109 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Suryakant s/o. Jaluram Telang Aged : 29 years, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 18 ) WITH (18) WRIT PETITION NO. 4110 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Digamber s/o. Nivratti Somwanshi, Aged : 32 years, R/o. Nideban (Udgir). 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 19 ) WITH (19) WRIT PETITION NO. 4111 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Vithal s/o. Pandu Somwanshi, Aged : 36 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Nideban (Udgir), District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ( 20 ) ........................ WITH (20) WRIT PETITION NO. 4112 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Mareppa s/o. Hanmant Suryawanshi, Aged : 35 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Respondent no.1 served (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ( 21 ) ........................ WITH (21) WRIT PETITION NO. 4113 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Rajaram s/o. Mareppa Somwanshi, Aged : 31 years, R/o. Nideban (Udgir), District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 22 ) WITH (22) WRIT PETITION NO. 4114 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Maruti s/o. Laxman Dubbewar (Telang), Aged : 37 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 23 ) WITH (23) WRIT PETITION NO. 4115 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Rajendra s/o. Tukaram Somwanshi, Aged : 31 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Nideban, Udgir. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 24 ) WITH (24) WRIT PETITION NO. 4116 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Bhagwan s/o. Rangaram Somwanshi, Aged : 33 years, R/o. Nideban (Udgir), District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 25 ) WITH (25) WRIT PETITION NO. 4117 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Shivdas s/o. Hasba Somwanshi, Aged : 37 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Respondent no.1 served (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 26 ) WITH (26) WRIT PETITION NO. 4118 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Pandu s/o. Narsing, Aged : 34 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 27 ) WITH (27) WRIT PETITION NO. 4119 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Udhav s/o. Govind Kamble, Aged : 34 years, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 28 ) WITH (28) WRIT PETITION NO. 4120 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Bhagwat s/o. Vithoba Bhosle, Aged : 37 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 29 ) WITH (29) WRIT PETITION NO. 4122 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Manohar s/o. Vithal Lawte, Aged : 33 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 30 ) WITH (30) WRIT PETITION NO. 4123 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Abdul Hameed Khan s/o. Jabbar Khan Pathan, Aged : 34 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Respondent no.1 served (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 31 ) WITH (31) WRIT PETITION NO. 4138 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Maruti s/o. Babji Apte, Aged : 38 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 32 ) WITH (32) WRIT PETITION NO. 4139 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Babu s/o. Shankar Somwanshi, Aged : 37 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 33 ) WITH (33) WRIT PETITION NO. 4140 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Shrawan s/o. Ganpati Somwanshi, Aged : 35 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 34 ) WITH (34) WRIT PETITION NO. 4141 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Abdul Bashir s/o. Raja Patel, Aged : 36 years, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 35 ) WITH (35) WRIT PETITION NO. 4142 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Mohamad Khaja, Aged : 41 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 36 ) WITH (36) WRIT PETITION NO. 4143 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Smt. Kondabai w/o. Manikrao Telang, Aged : 35 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 37 ) WITH (37) WRIT PETITION NO. 4144 OF 1991 1. Vice-Chancellor, Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. 2. Associate Dean cum Project Officer, Veterinary College, Udgir, District : Latur. .. Petitioners. versus 1. Piraji s/o. Chandoba Somwanshi, Aged : 34 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Udgir, District : Latur. 2. The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondents. ....................... Mr. G.N. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.1 and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, Advocate, for petitioner no.2. Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate, for respondent no.1 (Absent). Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent no.2. ........................ ( 38 ) CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 11TH JANUARY 2011 ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. As common questions of law and fact are involved in these petitions, they are being heard together and disposed of by this common judgment. 2. By these petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, namely, Vice Chancellor of Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani, and Associate Dean cum Project Officer of Veterinary College, Udgir, respectively, have challenged the judgment dated 21-8-1991, delivered by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Latur, in I.D.A. Case Nos. 87/1987 to 120/1987, 135/1987 to 138/1987 and 148/1987. Separate petitions are filed by them challenging this common judgment. 3. This Court has while issuing Rule in the matters on 21-1-1992, refused interim relief. 4. I have heard Mr. G.N. Shirsat and Mr. R.G. Shirsat, ( 39 ) learned Counsel appearing for the respective petitioners. Nobody has appeared for respective respondent no.1 / employees. The learned Assistant Government Pleaders have appeared for the State of Maharashtra. 5. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners have contended that the proceedings before the Labour Court were under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and therefore, of executory nature. 6. Unless and until there is existing right in favour of respective respondent no.1, recourse to that remedy is not permissible. The respondent no.1 contended that though he was working on daily wages, work done by him was identical and same as that of work done by any permanent workman in the employment of petitioners and, therefore, he claimed same wages as were / are payable to the permanent workman. In other words, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners pointed out, that doctrine of equal pay for equal work was invoked in those proceedings. The Labour Court has allowed those applications, after noticing that the present petitioners did not bring on record any difference in the nature of duties performed by workman on daily wages and by a permanent worker. They urged that basic burden in this respect was upon respondent no.1. ( 40 ) 7. It is pointed out that as there was no previous adjudication and declaration in favour of respective respondent no.1, the application under Section 33-C(2) was misconceived. In order to show that such doctrine is not applicable in proceedings under Section 33-C(2), reliance is placed upon judgment of the Apex Court, in the case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Ganesh Razak and another (1995 - I L.L.N. 402). Further to show that there cannot be any comparison between a daily wager and a permanent workman in such matters, reliance is being placed upon two other judgments of the Apex Court, in the case of State of Haryana Vs. Jasmer Singh and others (1997 (1) L.L.N. 1023), and in the case of Marathwada Agricultural University and others Vs. Marathwada Krishi Vidyapith, M.S.K.S. and others (2007 (4) L.L.N. 500). Hence according to the learned Counsel for the petitioners, proceedings before the Labour Court ought to have been dismissed at threshold without even issuing notice to them. 8. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondent no.2 have stated that the law as laid down by the Honourable Apex Court needs to be applied in the matter. 9. After hearing the learned Counsel appearing for the ( 41 ) petitioners and after perusal of judgments mentioned supra, it is apparent that the proceedings as filed under Section 33-C(2) by respective respondent no.1 were misconceived. In the case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Ganesh Razak and another (supra), the Honourable Apex Court has held that in limited jurisdiction available to it under Section 33-C(2), the Labour Court cannot examine dispute relating to entitlement of workman to parity in wages. In the said case before the Honourable Apex Court, there was no earlier adjudication by any forum, of the claim of workers and of their entitlement to be paid wages at the same rate at which regular workmen of the establishment were being paid. Their entitlement was disputed by the employer and, therefore, the Honourable Apex Court in paragraph 13 of the judgment has