'-? "I" ./ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH : EULASPUR WRIT PETITION N0.2603 OF 2001 PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS 1. Shh/nath Singh, S/o Shri Sumer Singh Rathore, aged about 47 years, resident of village Afrid, Tahsil Champa, Dist. Janjglr- Champa. 2. Mahendra Singh Rathore, S/o Shri Sumer Singh Rathore, aged about 35 yeare, resident' of viltage Afrid, Tahsil Champa, Dist. Janjgir-Champa. Versus 1. State of ChhatBsgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K. Building, Raipur. 2. Collector, Janjgir-Champa. 3. Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur. 4. Rudrashewar Saran Singh, S/o Chitrabhan Singh. 5. Smt. Bina Oevi, W/o Rudrashewar Saran Singh. Both resident of Champa, Tahsil & Dist. Janjglr-Champa. 6. Tahsildar, Champa, Dist. Janfeir-Champa. 7. Upper Collector, Korba, Dist. Korba. C/Vrit Petition under Articles 226/227 ofthe ConstituUon of India) Singte Bench : Hon'bte Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Sunil Sahu, counselforthepetiUoners. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 28tn day of July, 2009) Leamed counsel appearing for the petitionere does not want to contest the matter on merits, at this stage. However. leamed counsel submte that the petitioners may be permitted to file reply to the show cause notice dated 3-12-2001. He further submits that if the finat order has not been passed, the appropriate authority shall consider the response of the petitioners and pass proper orders, in accordance with law, to which learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with fte afore-stated liberty. Consequently, interim order, if any, stands vacated. Sd/- Satish K. Agmhotri Judge