IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.22302 of 2009 RAJENDRA YADAV @ PRAKASH @ PRAKASH JEE Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 4. 14.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a Police case under Sections 302 and other provisions of the Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms act. It is submitted that the petitioner is not named. It has been stated in paragraph 10 of the application that of the three named accused, Sudhir Ji has been granted bail in Cr. Misc. No. 9904 of 2004 on 21.5.2004. Only for reason of his antecedents, the petitioner is in custody since 10.6.2008. Considering grant of bail to named accused, let the petitioner, abovenamed be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Guraru P.S. Case No. 32 of 2000. It appears that other accused named above has been enlarged on bail, details of which are not noticed in the computerized chart of bail applications arising from the same F.I.R. even though the grant of bail to another co-accused on 21.5.2004 is noticed in the chart. The office is directed to ensure that the computerized chart being annexed to the bail application is in proper and correct form. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)