HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B.LOKUR AND HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.986 OF 2010 Dt: 23-11-2011. Between: Vaddula Rami Reddy and another .. APPELLANTS AND The State SHO, Pattabhipuram Law & Order PS, Guntur and others .. RESPONDENTS HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B.LOKUR AND HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.986 OF 2010 JUDGMENT: (PER HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI Madan B.Lokur) The appellants are aggrieved by an order dated 05.03.2010 passed by a learned single Judge in Writ Petition No.9037 of 2006. 2. According to the appellants, they were forcibly dispossessed by the respondents along with the police on 24.02.2006 from their premises bearing No.4-1-9, 4t h Lane, Lakshmipuram, Guntur. Learned counsel for the appellants says that a criminal complaint was also filed in this regard, but it appears that the criminal case has since been closed. 3. On the above facts, the appellants preferred a writ petition in this Court for a declaration that the official respondents had failed to discharge their duties when they took forcible possession of the appellants’ house property. It is also prayed that the appellants be restored possession of the property in question. 4. The learned single Judge found, and in our opinion quite rightly, that since the appellants have been dispossessed from the property, the only alternative for them is to file a suit in the civil court for recovery of possession as provided for under the Specific Relief Act. A writ petition is not maintainable since it would involve adjudication of various factual allegations made by the appellants. 5. In our opinion, the order passed by the learned single Judge does not call for any interference. 6. The writ appeal is dismissed. The interim applications are also dismissed. ( MADAN B.LOKUR, CJ ) Dt: 23-11-2011. ( SANJAY KUMAR, J ) TNB/VGSR