HIGH COURT OF CHHATnSGARH AT BILASPUR PETITIONBR: (Intafl) RE8PONDBNT Cr. M.P.No.444/2009 Robertson Koshy S/o Lt. Shri P. Koshy, Agcd 35 years, R/o Chandani Chouk Distt.-Jagdalpur (C.G,). VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Throu^hi P.S. Anusuchit Jati Jaajati, Jagdalpiu- (GG.). PBTITON UNDBR SECTION 482 OP THE CODE OP CRIMINAL PROCBDURE. 1973. (SB sHoa'ble Bte. T.P.Sharma, J.) Present:. Shri Devershi Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Rajendra Tripathi, P.L. for the State/respondent. ORAL-ORDER P'assedoa 27/8/2009) 1. ThM petition is for quashjnent of fhe cliaige sheet for fhe ofiTencc puaishable under Sectipn 376 of the Indiau Penal Code and other offences iacludiag the offenees 3 (l)(12) of the Schedute Caste and Schedule Tribe (Prevention ofAtrocitiesAct). The quashinent is prayed on the ground fhat crhne No. 29/07 registered agaiast the petitioner ia connection wifh ffae offence punisltabte uader aforesaid provisions, 2. Lcaraed counsel for the petitioner submlts that the entire copy of the chai^e sheet reveals fhat the coinplaiaaat was having knowledge ofthe facts that present petitioner is uot ia position to mariy with her. She has inamtained physical relationship on her own wiU fhat aay act of petition is not puxushabte Uader the aforesaid provisions of act and continuaace of such crimiaal proceediug would only amount to abuse of the process of fhe i: -u Court. ^ - -z-— 3. Leamed couiiselfor the State/respondent opposed ttie pettdon aad submits that if fhe aBegation made ia the chai^c sheet is made iu its fa.cc value fhen same would sufficient for convictfon ofthe petitioneruuder the aforesaid provisioas ofthe Act. 4. Copy of Pirst Infonnation Report and copy of tlie cbarge sheet perused. It reveals froin fhe First Iiifonaation Report and other documeats that on the pretext of niarriage present petitioner lias comiaitted contiauous iutercourse for long time with fhe complainant who is member of schedide tnbe, if aUegation made ia the chai^e sheet is admltted ia its face value then same wUl be sufficient for conviction of ffae petitioner for the offence punishable under the provisions ofa&resaid Acto. 5. On due consideration, I do not find aay scope for interference ia terms of Section 482 of fhe Code of Crimiual Procedure, 1973, Coasequently, the cnminal Proceeding pending on the basis of crime N0, 29/07 registered at Anusuchit Jati Jdnjati PoUce Station, Bastar is not liable to be quashed iu terms of Seetion 482 offhe Code ofCrmunal Procedure, 1973. Consequently, this petition K Uable to be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed. Sd/- T.P. Shanna Judge -^