IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN TUESDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2010 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1932 WP(C).No. 31390 of 2010(W) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ---------------------- A.THAJENESA, W/O.SHERIF, PART-TIME SWEEPER, P.W.D. INSPECTION BENGLOW, KULATHUPUZHA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN- 695001 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN- 695001 3. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PWD BUILDING SECTION, ANCHAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT.PIN-691001 4. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BUILDINGS DIVISION, PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT.PIN-691001 5. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BUILDINGS DIVISION, KOLLAM.PIN-691001 R1 TO R5 BY GOVT PLEADER SRI. ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/11/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts S. SIRI JAGAN, J. ----------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.31390 OF 2010 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of November, 2010 JUDGMENT The petitioner is a Part Time Sweeper working in the Public Works Department of the Government of Kerala. According to the petitioner, she is entitled to regularisation in service in accordance with Ext.P6 Government Order. Earlier, she filed W.P.(C)No.35326/2003, which was disposed of by Ext.P3 judgment directing the Government to extend the benefit of the Government Orders issued from time to time and disburse the pay admissible to the petitioner as per the Government Order dated 25.11.1998 and other relevant orders to the petitioner. Later, when there was a proposal to terminate the petitioner's service, she again filed W.P.(C)No.19870/2004, which was allowed by Ext.P4 judgment directing payment of the arrears of pay and allowances at the revised rate. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner is getting pay and allowances at the revised rate. But, her grievance in this writ petition is that her service has not been regularised. According to the petitioner, she is entitled to be W.P.(C)No.31390/10 2 regularised in service from 11.11.2000. The petitioner has filed Ext.P7 representation in this regard before the first respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P7 expeditiously. Having heard the learned Government Pleader also, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P7, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It would be open to the petitioner to rely on any judgment or Government order in favour of the petitioner, the applicability of which shall also be considered by the first respondent in accordance with law. S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE acd W.P.(C)No.31390/10 3 W.P.(C)No.31390/10 4