1 IN THE 111011 (‘UtiR’! OF KARNA1AKA, (‘IRCUfl’ BENC’II Ar GULT3ARGA 1)AIEI) Tills Tills 27 H DAY OFNOVF,MBER 2009 PRESENP 1Kb l-M 9’4’BLF; M”CaJl SIIc:E 1).VSHYLF.NDRA Kl:MAR ANI) Ilib I ioN iii F. MR. ‘usric K K N KIsSPsflaNARAYANA c’SS’. tiu £$i8JLOQSIVii4 RhfWk,EN: W IIAMMI’bAiLXLKHALlIsL NSARI Age:ui Afliflil I AZAK ANSART OCX; PisFi510 N1tR ic/U (SMANIYA COLONY. BANDY HIT LS RING kO%i) Ut LHARUA CC MI’LAlNANT (IvSnMWNAIK ADS’. AN1) 1. ilIisS1k1oF KARNAIAKA lilcoL nil 11% ‘lIiI’l’ SEtRE’IARY lsshGM.ORp (afi 2 IliK Ma iAiJIIKi Dii’cisc’i oR C I I,13A1? A I 1.Lt IRICIIY 3111 1’ S t).IOFSCO’Vlj CJI’LBARUA 2 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE) O & M CITY SUBDIV4 GESCOM, GULBARGA 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE) O&MCITY SUWDIV 1, GESCOM, GULBARGA ACCUSED C.C,C. IS FILED U/S 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMFT OF COURT AC PRAYING TO INiTIATE CONTEMF OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED AND PUNISHED AS PER LAW,FOR DELAYING TO OBEY THE ORDER OF HON 4 BLE COURT FOR 9 DAYS, COMPENSATE THE COMPLAINANT FOR MENTAL AGONY AND IMPOSE HEAVY FINE ON THE ACCUSED. This case coming on for orders this day, DN.SHYLENDRA KUMAR, J., made the following ORDER Writ petitioner in pending writ petition No82741/09 is the complainant in this contempt petition complaining that the interim order dated 1572O09 passed to the fOllowing effect: ORDER Heard, Respondent no4 is directed to re- connect power supply to the installation bearing RR Nos,EH 15002 3 & EH 15093 forthwith, This reconnection shall be subject to the result of the writ petition. Learned counsel appearing for respondents 2 to 6 prays for a week’s time to ifie statement of objections. Accordingly, list after the statement of objections is filed. has not been complied with promptly and that it is complied only nine days after the passing of the order, i.e. on 24.7.2009, and thereibre, warrants action against the respondent in contempt jurisdiction. 2. Sri M.M,Naik, learned counsel or the complainant is conspicuous by his absence. Nevertheless, we have looked into the contents of the petition and find that the matter does not warrant exercise of our jurisdiction as we cannot infer any contemptuous conduct on the part of the respondents. 3. We also notice that the complainant is not put to much inconvenience as he had the facility of electric power supply throughout, though for an intermittent period as a temporary measure. * ii 4 4. %e do net find any need to keep this contcmpt petition on the board of this court . any furth r. Therefore, it is dismissed. Sd! JUDGE Sd! JUDGE vgh*