1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 728 OF 2008 Eknath Govind Patil ...Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent Mrs. I. M. Koparkar for the petitioner. Mrs. P.H. Kantharia APP for State. CORAM; BILAL NAZKI & A.P. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED; 11TH APRIL, 2008. P.C.: 1. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned APP. This petition has come up, seeking parole on the ground that the daughter of the petitioner is getting married on 15-4- 2008. The learned APP has not objected to parole but has pointed out that earlier when he was granted parole, he had over stayed by 29 days. Normally we would not have allowed this application but in view of the fact that the daughter of the petitioner is getting married, we show indulgance and grant parole for 15 days with effect from the date when the petitioner produces two sureties in the amount of Rs. 5,000/- each and the personal bond. It is however, made clear that no application for grant of extension of parole shall be entertained, and in case the petitioner over stays the parole no further application for parole shall be entertained by the respondent after his arrest. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Copy of this order shall be made available to the petitioner today itself. 2 (BILAL NAZKI J.) (A.P. DESHPANDE J.)