IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37168 of 2011 Santosh Pandey @ Amit Pandey Versus The State Of Bihar ----------- 02/ 18.11.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Although petitioner is eye witness of the alleged occurrence but the impugned order of learned Addl. Sessions Judge reflects that one eye witness at para 17 of the case diary claimed in his statement that it was co-accused Mukhiya who opened fire on the deceased and so far as the petitioner and other accused are concerned, it is stated that they had caught hold of the deceased at the time of the alleged occurrence. Admittedly, having similar allegation some other accused persons have already been granted privilege of bail by another bench of this court. Accordingly, petitioner, Santosh Pandey @ Amit Pandey, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas at Sasaram in Dawath P.S. Case no. 44/2011. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)