IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-32138 of 2011 Date of Decision:25.11.2011 Jasdev Singh . . .Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab . . . Respondent ***** CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ***** Present: Mr.Kanwaljit Singh, Sr. Advocate, with Ms.Sukhwinder Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.K.D. Sachdeva, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Mr.Shashank Sharma, Advocate, for the complainant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions received from SI Lakhwant Kaur, has conceded that the petitioner has joined the investigation but at the same time submits that the gold ornaments are yet to be recovered. However, learned counsel for the State has fairly submitted that except for giving the list of articles neither there is any receipt nor any other evidence much less the photographs indicating that the gold ornaments were handed over to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that there is a receipt (Annexure P-4) on record as per which the jewellery was returned to the complainant way back on 29.9.2007. Be that as it may, order dated 20.10.2011 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions already contained therein. Petition is disposed of. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) NOVEMBER 25, 2011 JUDGE Vivek