^ ^. fttoB^ I ^^S^LS^ ^y 1l S, /^^,'^ (^' ^y Appellant HIGH COURT OF CHHARTTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminal Appeal No. 155 of 2000 Jashbir Singh @ Juli, s/o. Dayal Singh, r/o. Manendragarh, Ward No.17, aged 22 years, Dist. Korea (CG). Versus Respondent State of Chhattisgarh. ^'ili;;'.'^':-^ IP -•^fi Criminal ap&eal y/S. 374_(2) ofthe Criminal Procedure Code (SB: Hon'ble Mr. Ranganath Chandrakar, J. Present: ^frNone for the appellant. Shri A.V. Shridhar, Panel Lawyer for the State. J U DGM E NT (Delivered on this day of 7th October 2009) This jail appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29-10-1999 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Manendragarh in Sessions Trial No. 18/1999, whereby the accused/appellant has been convicted under Section 450, 376 and 323 of the 1PC and senteiiced to undergo R.l. for three years and to pay fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo further Rl for three months u/S. 450 IPC, Rl for seven years and to pay fine of Rs.2000/-, in default of payment of fine (o undergo further Rl for six months u/S. 376 of the IPC and Rl for six months and to pay of fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo further Rl forthree months u/S. 323 ofthe IPC. All the sentences are directed to run concurrently. 2) On perusal of the record, it is clear that a report regarding present status of the appellant was sought from the concerned jail authorities by this court vide order dated 27-7-2009. In compliance of the aforesaid order, The Superintendent, Central Jail, Bilaspur has sent a report enclosing the report of Superintendent, District Jail, Baikunthpur, wherein it has been stated that the accused/appellant has already been released from jail on 6-3-2004 after serving the entire sentence awarded to him. 3) In view of the above, the appeal is accordingly disposed of without entering into themerits of the case. — -- ^^^ R.N. Chandrakar Judge