IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY AT BOMBAY AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION GAURDIANSHIP PETITION NO.120 OF 2006 GAURDIANSHIP PETITION NO.120 OF 2006 GAURDIANSHIP PETITION NO.120 OF 2006 Pradeep Pravin Meghani ...Petitioner Pradeep Pravin Meghani ...Petitioner Pradeep Pravin Meghani ...Petitioner Mr.S.J.Khera for Petitioner Mr.S.J.Khera for Petitioner Mr.S.J.Khera for Petitioner CORAM: SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J. CORAM: SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J. CORAM: SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J. DATED: 11TH JANUARY, 2007 DATED: 11TH JANUARY, 2007 DATED: 11TH JANUARY, 2007 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The Petitioner is the son of one Praveen Meghani who 1. The Petitioner is the son of one Praveen Meghani who 1. The Petitioner is the son of one Praveen Meghani who is seriously ill. There are certain litigations pending is seriously ill. There are certain litigations pending is seriously ill. There are certain litigations pending against the said Praveen Meghani. The Petitioner has against the said Praveen Meghani. The Petitioner has against the said Praveen Meghani. The Petitioner has produced the report of CT Scan of the brain and the report produced the report of CT Scan of the brain and the report produced the report of CT Scan of the brain and the report of Angiography performed on Praveen Meghani in April, 2006. of Angiography performed on Praveen Meghani in April, 2006. of Angiography performed on Praveen Meghani in April, 2006. The said Praveen Meghani is also shown to have been The said Praveen Meghani is also shown to have been The said Praveen Meghani is also shown to have been hospitalised in November, 2006. It is the contention of the hospitalised in November, 2006. It is the contention of the hospitalised in November, 2006. It is the contention of the Petitioner that he will not be able to handle the case and Petitioner that he will not be able to handle the case and Petitioner that he will not be able to handle the case and hence, the Petitioner has applied to be appointed as hence, the Petitioner has applied to be appointed as hence, the Petitioner has applied to be appointed as guardian essentially to represent his father in the guardian essentially to represent his father in the guardian essentially to represent his father in the litigations pending against him. litigations pending against him. litigations pending against him. 2. The Petition is made absolute in terms of prayer 2. The Petition is made absolute in terms of prayer 2. The Petition is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). NOC. clause (a). NOC. clause (a). NOC. (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)