HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CONTEMPT CASE NO.426 OF 2010 Dt.16.4.2010 Between: A.Shakunthala .. Petitioner And Sri Nagi Reddy, IAS Secretary to Government, Social Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CONTEMPT CASE NO.426 OF 2010 ORDER: (Per Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah) Petitioner herein is the 1st respondent in W.P.No.13490 of 2002, which was disposed of by us, by order dated 24.8.2009 stating that it is not known whether the petitioner is a full time or part time worker for giving appropriate directions to be considered either under G.O.Ms.No.212 or G.O. (P).No.112, whichever is applicable. But, however, we directed the respondents herein, who were petitioners in the writ petition, to consider her case for regularization in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in A.Manjula Bhashini v. The Managing Director, A.P. Women’s Cooperative Finance Corporation Ltd.,[1]. It is stated that the petitioner was appointed in the year 1982 as Daily Wage Worker on a fixed monthly remuneration of Rs.50/- and subsequently her wages were also enhanced and she was entitled for regularization of service as per orders of the Government in G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.4.1994 and G.O.(P) No.112, dated 23.7.1997. When the petitioner approached the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, the Tribunal directed the respondents to examine the cases of the applicants in pursuance of the aforesaid G.Os. Aggrieved by the same, the said writ petition has been filed and this Court disposed of the same by the aforesaid order. It is stated that the petitioner has completed 25 years of service, but she has not been regularized. While disposing of the writ petition itself we have noticed that it is not known in which category the petitioner was appointed i.e., whether full time daily wage worker or part time daily wage worker and her appointment order is also not traceable to consider her case as per appropriate Government Orders. But, however, as the Apex Court has passed a general order to consider all the cases of the daily wage workers who are entitled or eligible to be considered for regularization shall be regularized subject to fulfillment of all the terms and conditions of the relevant G.Os., we have simply reiterated the orders of the Apex Court. But, the petitioner has failed to furnish any particulars even in the contempt case entitling her to be considered as per appropriate Government Orders. We do not see any wilful disobedience on the part of the respondents and the contempt case is accordingly dismissed. _________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J. _______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J. 16.4.2010 kpr [1] 2009 (5) ALD 58 (SC)