1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2161/2010 ( Sindhi Hindi Vidya Samiti, through its General Secretary -: versus :- Maharashtra State Information Commission, Nagpur & others ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri A.A. Naik, Adv. for petitioner. Shri N.S. Deshpande, Adv. for respondent no.2. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : JULY 15, 2010. The matter was heard yesterday and without prejudice to the contentions being advanced, the Court suggested that if copies of applications are made available by respondent no.2 for each school/college separately the petitioner – management should not object to the Public Information Officer concerned processing these applications in accordance with law. Today Adv. Shri Naik for petitioner and Adv. Shri Deshpande for respondent no.2 communicated their consent upon instructions but without prejudice to issues which arise in the matter. In the circumstances, respondent no.2 shall supply copies of applications separately for each school/college and the same shall be processed by Public Information Officer appointed for respective institution in accordance with law. It is made clear that in so processing the impugned orders shall not come in way of respective authority. All contentions raised by parties before this Court are 2 kept open for consideration at appropriate stage. The respondent no.2 states that he will supply requisite copies within 7 days and the learned counsel for petitioner – Trust states that same will be processed by respective Public Information Officer in accordance with law. JUDGE Tambaskar.