P fWS^' 'i-C ?I '-'(-'IOT57 L^-- IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTCSGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETETCON (5.) N0..-5?32/2011 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS ^^/ . 0~~^<'6r<?''^'' ^^y /" ^l' n.v ^y^ ^^'..••" B.S.Sahu, Son of late Padum Ram Sahu, aged about 64 years, Retired as Field Assistant, Water Resources Department, Sub Division Narayanpur, District Narayanpur, R/o. Village and post Kottar-a, Tahsil - Charama, District - Kanker (C.(5.), VERSUS / 1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Its Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.). / 2. Joint birector, Divisional Office Treasury, Accounts and Pensions, Bastar Division, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.&.) -3. District Treasury Officer, North Bastar, Kanker, District Kanker (.C.G.), WRITPETCTION UNDER ARTLCLE 226 OF THE COUNSTTTUTCON OF INDIA. The Petitioners above-named most respectfully submit as under:- L PARTECULARS OF THE PETETEONER: As mentioned in the cause title above. 2. PARTECULARS OF THE RE5PON&ENTS; ^ As mentioned in the cause title above. 3. PARTECULARS OF THE ORDERS_A6/MNST^VHICH PETETEON IS MADE -~ The petitioner is not challenging any particular order, but he is aggrieved the act of the respondents. XI-HC—7S BI^I w (<;•(]* wr 311^1 gmN; Deepti T^ -<11<11<'1'4, ®flly'|(c,fiidiyy —...^.'...L^.'Y^.-.^-'^^s'h *(lWfT a>*iiq»"""""""""""""' ""•"•"•• +-g^ 100 an^TTraq; (I'll^'i'?) ?^<1W «f?aSTI^T SB : Hon'ble Shn maninarainoRi 13-05-2011 Shri R.S. Patel, counset for th Shri Sushil Dubey, Govemm< The grievance of the petition^ dated 24/12/10 (Annexure p/1) payment of grant to the petition< released the said amount in fevou< made to the District Treasury Offic< been reteased nor any reason has tj< Considering the grievance rs matter with directions. The responc|« amount of gratuity to the petitioner| of copy of the order or communicat4 if the grievance of the peti(( approach the Retiral Dues Commifl^e With the aforesaid observaU4>ns *i<if<i<ii-i KiKHfif ^><a <n<^i< ^ajRnsii^T "Shrtvasiava,.;, (e petitioner. jnt Actvocate for the State. ^r is that even though vide sancUon order loint Director, Pension has sanctioned r, the District Treasury Officer has not of the petitioner. A representation was [r on 7/01/10 but neither any amount has |een assigned. |sed, it would be preper to dispose off the ent No.3 shatl either make payment of the within one month from the date of receipt specific reason for non-reiease. ioner subsists, he vwuid be at liberty to constituted. the retition is finally disposed off. Sd-/ Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ^ Judge