1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (C) NO.24/2011 in CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION ST. NO. 1621/2011 (The Khamgaon Urban Co.Op. Bank Ltd., Khamgaon through its Deputy General Manager - Vs. -Nitin Hanumandas Agrawal and others ) ................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... Shri Sanjay P. Deshpande, counsel for applicant Smt. S.W.Deshpande, Advocate with Shri I.W.Patil, counsel for respondent no. 1 Shri D.V.Siras, counsel for Respondent no. 2 ... CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 25th MARCH, 2011. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. This is an application for condonation of 4 days delay caused in filing Civil Revision Application. For the reasons stated in the application, I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay. Hence delay caused is condoned. 2 C.R.A.St. No. 1621/2011. The Civil Revision Application is taken up for hearing by consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties. The leaned counsel for the parties have filed compromise petition dated 25.3.2011, which is marked as “X” for identification. Shri Deshpande, the learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that one Mr. Kanchan Anil Kelkar, representing the applicant Bank, as authorized person, is present in this Court in person. Mrs. Deshpande, the learned counsel appearing along with Shri I.W.Patil, submits that respondent no.1 is also personally present in this Court. Shri D.V.Siras, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 submits that the president of the Society Shri Vikramsingh Parihar is also personally present before this Court. The learned counsels submit that the presence of respondent no.3 is not necessary as he 3 is a formal party. The learned counsel submits that the compromise petition is signed by the applicants and the respondent nos. 1 and 2 and they submits that the instant Civil Revision Application be disposed of in terms of this compromise petition, as settled. The compromise petition is taken on record. The Civil Revision Application is disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. No orders as to costs. JUDGE Rvjalit