IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 17783 of 2000 Between: ..... PETITIONER AND .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.HARI SREEDHAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ } ORAL ORDER: The action of the ﬁrst respondent in entertaining a petition ﬁled by the third respondent dated 06-08-2000 is questioned in this writ petition as arbitrary and illegal. The writ petition was dismissed for default as against the third respondent vide Court order dated 22-09-2004 and since it is the petition ﬁled by the third respondent which has been entertained by the ﬁrst respondent which lead to the filing of the present writ petition, the relief sought in the writ petition cannot be granted. The writ petition is dismissed as against the ﬁrst and second respondents also. No order as to costs. _______________ 28th August, 2008 SKM