IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5463 of 2010 SUMIYA DEVI, wife of Late Fatuli Yadav, resident of Village Rasalpur, P.S.Naugachia, Distt. Bhagalpur. ---Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR through its Secretary, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, through its Registrar, District Bhagalpur. 3. Vice Chancellor of Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. 4. The Registrar of Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, District Bhagalpur. 5. The Principal of G.B. College, Naugachia, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, District-Bhagalpur. ---Respondents ----------- 2. 31.3.2010 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Ashok Kumar Keshari, learned counsel appearing for the respondent- University. The grievances of the petitioner is that although her husband superannuated from the post of Peon on 31st of March, 2000 while working in G.B. College, Naugachia, and later died on 12.11.2005, but still the full retiral dues as also some other dues on account of salary have remained to be settled. It is submitted that the College where the husband of the petitioner was working had also prepared the unpaid difference of salary payable to the deceased employee, as contained in Annexure 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent- University submits that the claim of the petitioner is an old one and that too the writ application lacks of relevant details. The representation, which is said to have been filed by the petitioner, as 2 contained in Annexure 3, equally mentions no relevant details. In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, the petitioner proposes to file a fresh representation before the Registrar of Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur (respondent no.4). In case such a representation is filed stating the details of the aforesaid claims as also enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claims along with the certified copy of the present order within a period of six weeks, the grievances of the petitioner as raised in her representation shall be considered in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months on receipt of such representation, so that the grievances of the petitioner as raised in her representation may be settled at the earliest and the admitted dues, if any, may also be paid with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. PNM (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)