1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CAW NO. 2780 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1032 OF 2010 (Rashtriya Shikshan Sanstha, Chichtola vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DECEMBER 09, 2011. Shri Jibhkate, learned counsel for the applicant / Respondent No. 5 states that because he was not present when most part of the judgment was dictated in the Court, some wrong facts have come on record. He contends that by moving this application for speaking to minutes, facts which are correct and on record are sought to be shown to this Court so that the same can be incorporated in the judgment. Mrs. Raskar, learned counsel for the original petitioner is disputing this. According to the learned counsel, the facts noted in the judgment are correct. In this view of the matter, it is apparent that the grievance of Shri Jibhkate, learned counsel cannot be looked into in this application. Hence, with liberty to the applicant/ Respondent No. 5 to move appropriate application, as is permitted in law, 2 we dispose of the present civil application. JUDGE JUDGE *GS.