Civil Revision No. 6257 of 2010 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Revision No. 6257 of 2010 Date of Decision: 27.9.2010 Satish Kumar …Petitioner Versus Dhirender Pal Gupta and Another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) In the present case, the Rent Controller, Narwana, has declined the prayer of the tenant to file rejoinder to the replication filed by the landlord. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the replication, the landlord has taken a new plea. In the eviction petition (Annexure P1) it was stated that Meli Ram has taken the shop on rent on 1.1.1997 at the rate of Rs.300/- per annum and then the rent was increased to Rs.15,000/- for six months period. In the replication (Annexure P3), only the explanation is added as to what was stated in para No.1 of the eviction petition. It is stated therein that the rent was increased to Rs.19,000/- per annum and thereafter to Rs. 30,000/- per annum. Hence, no new plea has been added in the replication and rightly, an inference can be drawn that plea Civil Revision No. 6257 of 2010 2 to file rejoinder to the replication is nothing but a tactic to delay the culmination of eviction proceedings. Hence, no interference is warranted in the present revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed, in limine. Nothing stated herein shall be construed as final opinion on the merits of the case. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge September 27, 2010 “DK”