THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.27926 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner filed instant writ petition challenging notice, dated 01.08.2007 (issued more than a year ago), of first respondent directing petitioner to show cause as to why the assignment of land admeasuring Acs.1.29 in survey No.62/6 and Acs.0.10 in survey No.62/7, totalling Acs.2.39 (subject land, for brevity), which was allotted under Cooperative Joint Farming Society Scheme (CJFSS), should not be cancelled. The petitioner is statedly an agricultural coolie. She was assigned subject land, which is her livelihood. Allegedly for the present crop year, she raised sunflower. First respondent issued notice on 01.08.2007 alleging that petitioner did not cultivate the land and therefore, it is decided to cancel the allotment. She was asked to submit explanation. The petitioner allegedly submitted explanation and the enquiry is pending before first respondent. Nonetheless, the Tahsildar, Udayagiri, issued notice, dated 29.09.2008, directing petitioner not to enter the subject land in survey No.62/6 admeasuring Acs.1.29 on the ground that petitioner failed to produce any document evidencing her right over the land belonging to CJFSS. Aggrieved by the same, present writ petition is filed. This Court heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (General-Andhra). Tahsildar, Udayagiri, is not a party respondent to writ petition. In the notice, dated 29.09.2008, he chose to refer to show cause notice issued by Revenue Divisional Officer, Kavali but no reference to explanation, which is statedly submitted by petitioner. Secondly, if the petitioner is in possession and allegedly raised crops, merely because she did not submit documents as advised in the show cause notice, dated 01.08.2007, Tahsildar may not prohibit petitioner from cultivating or entering the land especially when there is sunflower crop on the land. Therefore, petitioner is given liberty to approach the Revenue Divisional Officer for necessary redressal and produce evidence in support of her case that she and her family are depending on the land for livelihood and that they are cultivating the land. Till an enquiry is completed by Revenue Divisional Officer after considering the evidence that may be produced by petitioner, no coercive steps shall be taken by Tahsildar nor the petitioner can be prevented from entering the land. The writ petition, with the above observations, is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 24.12.2008 pln