ADMINIS-i'RATI'V'E TRIBUBAL BEHCH , JABALPOR F8.&S&Q SAGAR. OPADHYA? S/0 SHRI RAMAYAN OPADHYAY, AGED _ YEARS, HEAD CONSl'ABLE,. DISTRICI CRIME BRANCH, TAHSIL AND DISTRICT RAIPUR VERSUS RESPONDESTS; RAIPUR M.P. 1. uovernment of Madhya Eradesh Through Hoae Secretary, Home Departaent, Bfaopal 2. Director General & Inspeetor General of Pollce, Hadhya Pradesh, Bhopal > 5. Inspector General o£ Police, Durg i Slallal' Zone, Bnilai (32 quartersj 1 4. Inspector General of Police, I Coaputer Wing, Police Ueadquarters^ Btiopal , sbopal M.P. I,: 5. Superintendent af Police,Raipur District, Ralpur M.P. 6. Shri Anirsingb Tlaakur, Asstt. Sub- 1 Inspector of Police, 7. Shri Kesbav Prasad 8. Sbri Jaisingh 9. Shri Raalal Sharaa 10.3hri Raaanand Tiwari 11.3hri Sabdeo Ram 12.3hri Udayapal Singh 15.3hri Bathamani 14.Sfari Kaakripal Yadav 15.3fari Suraj Pal Singh i- -2- 16. Shri Hehttar Singh 17. Sbri Rajaaxi 18. Shri Kirtan Pradhan * 19. Shri Sarwanand 20. Sbri Gorakh Natb 21. Shri Hiralal Yadav 22. Shri Sfayaalal Saratbi 23. Shra Sandar Lal 24. Shri Eamnarayan • 25. Shri Raai Prakash G/O Supdt. oS Police, Raipur BBI; BETAILS OF APPLICATIOH : 1. Particulars of -ttoe applicant: iini .^W&E^ ^ Cui HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR APPLICANT WRTT PETmON (S) No. 667 of2005 Anant Sagar Upadhyay. RESPONDENTS VERSUS Govemment ofMadhva Pradesh & Others. APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE ADMI^ISTRATIVE TMBLTSTALS ACT, 1985. SB:JIon'bleShri Sattsh K. Agmhotei, J. Present: None for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer for the State. OKDERfORAL) (Passed on 23 day of September, Amit 1. The matter is called for hearing twice. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner may not be interested in pursuingthe matter. 2. In view ofthe above, the matter is dismissed for want ofprosecution. 3. Registry is directed to send a copy ofthis order to the petitioner, forthwith. Satish K. Agmhotri