IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6338 of 2009 KUMARI SWAPNA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 2. 20.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The contention of the petitioner is that she was appointed as Panchayat Shikshak on 30.12.2006 based on her qualification of Prathama from Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Allahabad. She is aggrieved by the order of termination dated 27.9.2008 on the ground that the qualification from the said institution was not acceptable for employment. The submission is that the issue stands decided by this Court in CWJC No. 10748 of 2008 disposed on 7.4.2009 that the policy decision of the State Government in this respect had been taken only on 20.11.2008 and, therefore, it had to be prospective in operation and no termination of appointment made prior to that date could be made on the aforesaid ground. Learned counsel for the State fairly submits that if the petitioner is covered on the issue decided by this Court in CWJC No. 10748 of 2008, he shall be entitled to be accorded similar treatment. The writ application is disposed with direction to the Respondents to examine the claim of the petitioner in light of the directions in CWJC No. 10748 of 2008. If the Respondents propose to hold that he is not covered by the same, they shall be 2 required to furnish the reasons to him for the same. Thereafter the Respondents shall be obliged to pass a reasoned and speaking order displaying application of mind setting out grounds of difference of opinion, so that judicial review, if occasion arises, shall be facilitated. Let this exercise be completed by the Respondents within a maximum period of six weeks from the date of receipt and/or production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)