IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 9392 of 2004 Between: Yadlapalli Venkata Ramanna S/o Kasi Visweswararao R/o Thirupathipuram, Attili Mandal, West Godawari Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 West Godavari Zilla Parishath, rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishath, Eluru, W.G. Dist. 2 Deputy Executive Engineer, Panchayath Raj, Sub-Division, Penumantra, Penumantra Mandal, West Godavari District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. K.VIDYASAGAR FOR MR.P.VINAYAKA SWAMY The Court made the following : ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition itself is taken up for hearing and disposal at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “For the reasons stated in the above the petitioners herein pray that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ of Mandamus declaring impugned order is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents continuing me as a tenant by end of lease period i.e. 2005-2006.” Sri K.Vidyasagar, learned counsel representing Sri P.Vinayaka Swamy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. In view of the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. C.V.NARAGJUNA REDDY, J 24th June, 2008. kvni