IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI TUESDAY, THE 11TH AUGUST 2009 / 20TH SRAVANA 1931 LA.App..No. 424 of 2008() ------------------------- LAR.316/1997 of ADDL.SUB COURT,KOLLAM .................... APPELLANT(S): RESPONDENT: ------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENT(S): CLAIMANT: ------------------------ 1. OMANA, D/O. CHATHINA, KOCHUVEEDU, PERUMON CHERRI, PANAYAM VILLAGE. 2. MOLIKUTTY, D/O. OMANA, KOCHUVEEDU, PERUMON CHERRI, PANAYAM VILLAGE. 3. SINDHU, D/O. OMANA, KOCHUVEEDU, PERUMON CHERRI, PANAYAM VILLAGE. THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L.A.A.No.424 OF 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of August, 2009 JUDGMENT Pius.C.Kuriakose, J. It is fairly conceded by the learned Government Pleader that enhancement in cases pertaining to the same acquisition from Rs. 6293/- Rs. 18,000/- per Are has been approved in L.A.A.No.683/2009 and we do notice that there is a slight difference in the refixed land value. But we notice that both the acquisitions were pursuant to the very same notification. We are of the view that in view of the approval granted to the refixation at Rs. 18,000/- per Are, it is not necessary that we interfere with the impugned judgment. After all, the variation is not much. The appeal will stand dismissed. PIUS C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE P.Q.BARKATH ALI JUDGE sv.