IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.10138 of 2009 Date of Decision: 13.07.2009 Manorama Tyagi Petitioner Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority and others Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH Present: Mr.Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the petitioner ….. Jasbir Singh, J.(Oral) Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr.Tarunveer Vashisth, Additional Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice. In view of order, which this Court is going to pass, it is not necessary to get counter affidavit of the official respondents. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with a prayer that directions be issued to the respondents to issue her a plot, reserved for retired government employees (GSRQ-A). It is case of the petitioner that as per policy of the State government, she moved an application in the year 2006, within the stipulated period, as fixed by the respondents, to get a plot allotted. Her application was for allotment of 14 marla of plot. She was found eligible and as per her information, she was also allotted a plot bearing No.411 in Sector 64, Faridabad. Despite requests made, allotment letter was not issued. Civil Writ Petition No.10138 of 2008 By making reference to various letters on record, her counsel states that on demand, she has furnished all documents to the authorities. She has gone to the office of the respondents on many occasions, despite that, even by now, allotment letter has not been issued in her favour. She received last communication from respondent No.2 on 27.11.2007. In response to above said letter, she supplied the requisite information, demanded in that letter. Nothing has happened thereafter. In view of facts of this case, this writ petition is disposed of and directions are issued to respondent No.2 to take decision on application, moved by the petitioner for allotment of a plot and if she is found eligible, plot be allotted to her forthwith. Otherwise, after hearing her, a reasoned order be passed and the same be conveyed to her. Needful be done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Copy of the order be supplied to the State counsel under signatures of the Court Reader for compliance. 13.07.2009 (Jasbir Singh) gk Judge 2