IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SLA No.89 of 2010 NARAYAN PRASAD GUPTA son of Laxman Prasad Gupta, resident of Nai Bazar,Ward No. 7 P.S.Buxar Town, District Buxar … Petitioner Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Akhilesh Chaudhary son of late Dwarika Choudhary 3. Jai Ram Chaudhary son of Shiv Kumar Choudhary Both residents of Gopal Nagar Chakia, P.S.Buxar(M), District Buxar … … Opp. parties For the petitioner: Shri Ashok Kumar Mishra No.2 ----------- 4. 4.3.2011 After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner-appellant and after having perused the impugned judgment which is the basis for filing the present Special Leave to Appeal what this Court finds is that the learned trial court has read the facts correctly in favour of the defence and, as such, there is no compelling reason to grant special leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted by drawing attention of the Court to the operation part of the order specially that by which the following directions were issued by the learned Magistrate to delete the same: “From evidence and materials on the record as well as facts and circumstances of this case I am of the opinion that there was no reasonable ground for making the accusation against Akhilesh Chaudhary and Jairam Chaudhary of this case. So the complainant is directed to show cause why he should not pay compensation to Akhilesh Chaudhary and Jairam Chaudhary of this case.” The learned trial Magistrate has issued notice to the complainant directing him to show cause as to why he should not be directed to pay compensation to the opposite parties- 2 respondents Akhilesh Chaudhary and Jairam Chaudhary. This part of the order of the Judicial Magistrate does not show that he has committed any error . However, the petitioner- appellant has a right to contest the notice and as and when any adverse order is passed against him he has the remedy available under law This S.L.A appears of no merit. It is dismissed. Kanth ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)