1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 32/2011 in WRIT PETITOIN NO. 3829/2005 (Siddartha Adinath Ukey vrs. Eknath Bajirao Patil and others) ................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... Smt. Smita V.Taksande, counsel for Petitioner Shri A.M.Deshpande, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 4 ... CORAM : R. K.DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 13th APRIL, 2011. The complaint in this petition is that the order passed by this Court on 18th February, 2010, in Writ Petition No. 3829/2005 has not been complied with. This Court had issued direction to the respondent to consider the entitlement of the petitioner independently in accordance with law and as per the policy of the State Government for regularization. It was further directed that the decision be communicated to the petitioner in any case by 30.06.2010. 2 2] In response to the notice issued by this Court, the respondent no. 2 has filed an affidavit, stating that the decision has already been taken by the Government on 29.04.2010, a copy of which is placed on record, which is marked as “X” for identification. The claim of the petitioner has been rejected. It is, however, admitted that the decision was not communicated to the petitioner as contemplated by the order dated 18th February, 2010. 3] In view of above, there is no case made out for proceeding with this contempt petition. However, for non communication of the order to the petitioner in a stipulated time, the respondents shall pay costs of Rs.1500/- to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today. The contempt proceeding is, therefore, dropped. JUDGE Rvjalit