ast 1 format IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2773 OF 2010 Shri Dnyanu Rama Pawar. ....Petitioner Vs. Tahasildar, Walwa at Islampur District: Sangli & ors. ....Respondents Shri Shrikant Chavan i/b. Shri Umesh Mankapure, advocate for petitioner. Shri V.C.Gokhale, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM:­ A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.M.SAVANT, JJ DATED:­ APRIL 26, 2010 P.C. 1. Heard Counsel for the parties. 2. We find force in the argument of the learned AGP that since the Petitioner has filed civil proceedings in respect of the land in question and the question whether the Petitioner is tenant was one of the issue to be addressed, in view of the mandatory provisions of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, reference was made to the Tenancy Authority. The Tenancy Authority in turn has finally answered the said issue and returned its findings to the Civil Court. In other words, the relevant record would be part of the record before the Civil Court. The Petitioner through Counsel fairly concedes that the Petitioner has not applied for certified copy of the Judgment of the Tahsildar to ast 2 format the concerned Civil Court in the first place. In absence thereof, the Petitioner has rushed to this Court. In the circumstances, we dispose of this Petition, with liberty to the Petitioner to make appropriate application before the Civil Court, as may be advised and the Civil Court on receipt of such application, may provide certified copy of the relevant documents to the Petitioner expeditiously. (R.M. SAVANT, J) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)