IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23644 of 2009 MRITUNJAY KUMAR Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02. 17.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the informant. Husband of the complainant has approached this court seeking protection under Section 438 of the Cr. P.C. in respect of an allegation constituting offence under Section 498A of the Penal Code. Complainant has stated that the husband demanded dowry. On non-fulfillment of the demand, she was tortured and assaulted. An attempt was made to poison her to death. It is further alleged in the complaint that subsequently he married another lady. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that he is still prepared to take back the complainant to her matrimonial home and keep her as a wife with all due care and dignity. Having regard to the allegation, this court is not satisfied that a good case for anticipatory made is made out. Prayer for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. Sym/ (Kishore K. Mandal, J.)