^s IN THE HON*BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(Cl N0. l^f3 /2009 PETITIQNERS ^ ^' Ashok Kumar S/o Haryal Das, Aged about - 47 years, R/o Telibandha, Raipur, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) Suresh Kumar S/o Haryal Das, Aged about 42 years, R/o Telibandha, Raipur, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Department of Urban Administration 85 Development, D. K. S. Bhavan, Raipyr (C.G.) 2. Raipur Municipal Corporation, Through- Its Commissioner, Raipur, Distt. - Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22^ OF THE CONSTmJTION <^ OFINDIA RESPONDENTS :; p/^^ ^ ^^ 1. /,^^\ •<,wse?j '%. ^<;^ ^%-^ kvv HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRJT PETITION (C) N0.1219 QF 2009 PETITIQNERS Ashok Kumar & Another RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Another (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Sunil Otwani, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Arun Sao, Govt. Advocate for the State. Shri Kashif Shakeel, Advocate for the respondent No.2. ORDER (Passed on this 7th day of September, 2011) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly and fairly submit that the issue involved in this petition is squarely covered by a decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Municipal Corporation, Raipur v. Smt. Mandakini Ram & Another & other connected matters, which according to the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation was taken to the Supreme Court also wherein the Special Level Petition filed by the Corporation has been dismissed. Thus, the instant matter may be disposed of in terms of Smt. Mandakini Ram (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of para 12 of the decision of this Court in Smt. Mandakini Ram (supra). No order asto costs. Gowri Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge 1 WA No. 143 of 2009 (decided on 21-10-2009)