1 cp61.10 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.61 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4007 OF 2009 [Yashodabai w/o Krishna Pandhare & Ors. vs. Shri. J.P. Dange & Ors.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Mr. A.B. Kale, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. D.V. Tele, AGP for State/Respondents. CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. DATE : 7TH JULY, 2011 PER COURT : This Contempt Petition alleges disobedience of the order passed by the learned Division Bench of this Court on 11-11-2009 in Writ Petition No. 4007 of 2009. Relevant portion of the said order reads thus : " 2) I say that, now the additional award is prepared as per the decision taken by the Government and the same is sent to 2 cp61.10 the Acquiring Body. I say that, the Acquiring Body will take the necessary steps for releasing the said amount.". 3) Learned A.G.P. further states that in pursuance of the additional award, so prepared, necessary steps, as regards payment of amounts under the additional award, would be taken at the earliest. 4) In the light of the aforesaid averments made in the affidavit in reply and the statement made by learned A.G.P., the petition stands disposed of." 2. In this Contempt Petition, notices were issued to the respondents on 15-03-2010. In pursuant to the notice, Special Land Acquisition Officer has filed affidavit in reply. In Para-4 of the affidavit in reply, it is stated that the directions are complied. 3. It is not in dispute that in pursuant to passing of additional award, the petitioners have received payment. 3 cp61.10 However, it is the contention of the Counsel for the petitioners that statutory benefits and interest on the said amount is not included in the additional award and not paid to the petitioners. 4. I have gone through the affidavit in reply filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer. It is not in dispute that the additional award is passed. If the petitioners are aggrieved by non inclusion of the statutory benefits and also interest in the said additional award, in that case, the petitioners are at liberty to take appropriate remedy. 5. Taking into consideration the affidavit in reply and order of which disobedience has been alleged in this Contempt Petition, no further orders are required to be passed in this Contempt Petition. Contempt Petition is disposed 4 cp61.10 of. Notice stands discharged. 6. The petitioners would be at liberty to take appropriate remedy if they are aggrieved by the additional award. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] sut/JUL11