IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.41803 of 2010 1. SITA DEVI, 2. PURAN BIND, 3. KAILASH BIND. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2/ 26/03/2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioners family members in a police case under Section-304B/34 of Indian Penal Code is that the First Information Report itself states that the deceased was suffering from T.B. and the medication was not proving useful. It is submitted that she died of the same. The impugned order of rejection notices no materials from the case diary whether any viscera was seized, much less sent for examination and the report of the same before denying the privilege of anticipatory bail. Having considered the facts and circumstances let the petitioners above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) each along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in Medni Chowki P.S. Case 2 No.15/10 subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) of Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)