BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Tenth day of October Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice S.NAGAMUTHU CRL OP(MD) No.13135 of 2011 1 RANJITH 2 RAJA @ JAYARAJ ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 3 & 4 Vs STATE : REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN SOUTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL, CRIME NO.924/2011 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. S.MAHENDRAPATHY Advocate For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest, the petitioners are A-3 and 4, in Crime No.924 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341, 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, have come forward with this petition seeking for anticipatory bail. 2. According to the case of the prosecution, due to some quarrel, it is alleged that the accused Nos.1 and 2 attacked the de-facto complainant with deadly weapons and these two accused attacked with stones. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. It is also submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and no prejudice would be caused to the prosecution in the event of the petitioners' release on anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the injury is simple in nature and the injured has already been discharged from the hospital. 5. Having regard to the nature of the allegations made against these petitioners and all other attending circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul, on each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously. sd/- 10/10/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III DINDIGUL. 2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN SOUTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL. 4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. S.MAHENDRAPATHY Advocate SR. No.34989 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13135 of 2011 Date :10/10/2011 RJ/12.10.11 2p/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/