IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 18301 of 2001 Between: G.Ravindranath Sarma S/o G.Kantha Rao Puttaparthi, Ananthapur Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The SH.O., Puttaparthi Urban Police Station, Puttaparthi, Ananthapur District. 2 The Dy.Superintendent of Police (Security Wing), Puttaparthi, Ananthapur District. 3 The Superintendent of Police, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents police in harassing and pressurizing the petitioner to leave Puttaparthy, Ananthapur Dist, and in interfering with the personal liberty of the petitioner and his family members without any cause, as illegal, arbitrary and unwarranted and consequently direct the respondents to act in accordance with law and forebear from interfering with the personal liberty of the petitioner and his family members. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. KUNCHEAM MAHESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.Kuncheam Maheswara Rao, submits that the matter has become infructuous. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 21-06-2005 vs To 1. The S.H.O., Puttaparthi Urban Police Station, Puttaparthi, Ananthapur District. 2. The Dy.Superintendent of Police (Security Wing), Puttaparthi, Ananthapur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District. 4. The Government Pleader for Home, High Court Buildings, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad )O.U.T) 5. 2 CD copies.