~ *‘WV’V‘wwwwvw 7.”," 5:2. n3 /_ 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (CEHATTISGARH) WRIT pETITION No. 2"‘7‘23 OF 2003. l) Ravi Badgaiyan, son of Vishwa— nath Badgaiyan, aged about 39 years, working as Constable, (Te lecom) . ewm 2) Surya Pr‘atap singh, son of Vikram Singh, aged about 42 yrs“ working as Constable,(Telecom) . PETIT IONERS .nmaw'v" Rajendra Prasad Tyagi, son of Harvilash Tyagi, aged about 41 years, working: as Constable (Telecom) o < All the petitioners are present— 1i ly posted in the Office of suoerintendent of Police , Teieoom ( Radio), Bilaspur (C.G.) 1) Union of India, through The Secretary, Department of Personnel/Public, GrieVances and Pension, Third Floor; ‘Lok Nayak Bhawan, New Qelhic state of Madhya Pradesh: through , the 5ecretary. Department of Home Affairs, Vallabh Bhawa‘n,Bhopa1, (WP .) RESPONDENTS State of chhattisgarh, thrOugh The Secretary? Department of Home Affairs MantralaYa, boK.Su Building, Raipur (C.G.) a W . WRIT pETITION‘? , UNDER ARTICLE 226/227“¢o«‘ THE f, i CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1o Particulars of the Petitioners As per cause title” contdo .a 2., . o HIGH COURT OF CHHA’I‘TISGARH AT BILASPUR Single Bench: Hon’bls Mr. Justics satish K. Agnihotri. Writ Petition No. 2723 of 2003 Petifioners ‘Ravi Badgaiyan and two other Versus RESpondents Uniox1 of India &- others Shri Rajaudra Tripathi, Advocate for the peiitioners. Shri S. K. Beriwal, $tanding counsel for Respondent No. 1. Shn' Sachin Singh Rajput for Respondent No, 2. Shxi Pallkaj Shrivastava, Panel lawyer for the respondétnt No, 3. ORAL ORDER ( 8th Februayy, 2006) Th6 following order of the Court was passed by Satish K. Aglihotri, J. 1. Learned coullsal aypeaxing for the petitioners submits that The petitioners are working in the offlce of the Superintendent of Police, Telecom (Radio), Bilaspur. They are permanent resident of the State of Madhya Pradesh. The petitioners have been allocated to the State of Chhattisgarh and they want their reallocation to the State of Madhya Pradesh. Learned counsel for the petitioners, o instruction, submits that the petitioners be granted liberty to make a representation to the respondents for redressal of their grievances. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to the said submission, In View of the foregoing, the petition stands disposed of finally, with liberty to the petitioners to make an appropriate representation to the respondentsfanthorities concerned, within 'a period of two weeks from today, and the respondents/authorities are directed to consider and decide the same, in an objective manner, in accordance with law, within a period of eight Weeks from the date of receipt of the representation, if any. v r/K/ Satish K-Agmhotri ) Judge W 01 / Certified copy, as per Rules, i Sd/—, Thakur s n r