BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifteenth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRL OP(MD) No.16393 of 2011 BOOMINATHAN ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARTHIBANOOR POLICE STATION, RAMNAD DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.131 OF 2011) ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. P.MUTHUSAMY Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the sole accused and he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) I.P.C. in Crime No.131 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Heard Mr.P.Muthusamy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in his argument that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate would submit in his argument that the petitioner is the husband of the de-facto complainant and there is a family dispute between the husband and wife. He would further submit that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence and the investigation is offing and the plea of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail may not be considered. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence and it is a family dispute between the husband and wife, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled. sd/- 15/12/2011 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PARAMAKUDI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARTHIBANOOR POLICE STATION, RAMNAD DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S. P.MUTHUSAMY Advocate SR.No.43808 rl/6c – 19.12.2011 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16393 of 2011 Date :15/12/2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/