12 ao 819.10.doc srk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 819 OF 2010 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1027 OF 2010 M/s. Sagar Containers ....Appellant Versus The Commissioner Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. N.V.Vechalekar for the Appellant. Mr. S.R. Ganbavale for the Respondents. CORAM : R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED : 2ND AUGUST, 2010. P.C.: This Appeal is directed against an order passed below Exhibit 5 in Special Civil Suit No. 1597 of 2005 by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, whereby he restrained the Respondent- Municipal Corporation from attaching the Plaintiffs property on Appellants depositing a sum of Rs.20,34,229/- which had been demanded by the Municipal Corporation. No fault can be found with this order passed by the learned trial Judge at the instance of the Appellant, though, the order may be vulnerable to attack on the part of the Corporation saying that such an injunction could not have been 1 12 ao 819.10.doc issued. In view of this, since the loss which the Appellant is likely to suffer is perfectly computable in terms of money it cannot be termed as an irreparable loss. The learned Judge was gracious enough to stay the recovery of the amount under notice by attachment of the Appellants property on the condition that the Appellant should deposit the sum demanded, which he had ordered to be deposited in a Bank. In view of this, the Appeal from Order is merit-less and dismissed. Accordingly, the Civil Application also stand disposed of. (R.C. CHAVAN, J.) 2