u IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR w.P. (s1 No. , 720} 12009 PETITIONER :: (”Rishikesh Gupta, S/o Rupram Gupta, aged about 59 years, R/o Village Jurda, Tharia Chakradhar Nagar, Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) VERSUS ESPONDENTS /1: State of Chhattisgarh Through R Secretaly \Department of Revenue D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Rajgarh District. Rajgarh \ T : (C.G.) / 3. Tahsildar, Raipur (C.G.) _ Ghardhoda, District ‘ RIT, PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22gK OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ’ FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT WRITS ORDER ORDERS DIRECTION]DIRECTIONS ETC. W H§GH CGURT Oi: CHHATTIGARH : BMQSPUR S V Wiit Petitkm i3? N612G3 a? 2$§§ {Writ Petition unéer Ariicie 226 of the Constkutioh of imiia) Singk Bench : Hen’bEe Shri Satish K‘ Agnihotri, J. Presem: Ms Hamida Siddiqui, c‘Eunse’i for the petitiener. ‘Sjhfi mPs. Bhatia, Dy. Govt. Advocate €or the State, Omar—2 gaRALg j V , his 9 day cf Degemhek, 2909} {Passed on t, With the cement of‘ ieamed cgunsé! far the pames, the pefiticn is 7nearri finaiiy. This case nertams to grievarye cf non-gram o: retzrai due: T’ms Court m W ? Na 4$42i260£ {aaijmth Manda; V5 The State o§ Chhamsgarh & athefsj am other cannected meme $ darectezi the Committee ts cqnsédef the matier iaf retria? dues as the disputeé _ quesiion of facts wefe i'nvoiveé. The Commiitee Wae coas’zituteii by me Siate G’avernmem, pursuani “ta the orelei’ éated 19-06-20a6 passed in W.P.No;196132066 wet Keja‘Bai Chandraker Vs. State Government. of ChhattEsgerh aria others), I and arcier‘ dated 13-3-2908 eaes’ed if}! M.C.C. gin. 16$ of 2§08 (State of Chhattisgarh and where Vs gaimath Mendai and enema} Thus this nemaon is sguareiy coverea by the wégmem aed crder daiea 31 st January, 2808 yassed in W.P.No. 4&42i2904 {Baunath Manda! (sup:a}}, as submiited by §earnedccuwasei appearing ior the pafties. This nemicn is accerdingiy'disposee of in the same ierms i.e.5 ihe af‘gce of the Advecate Geneiei as digested t0 send the case ta the , Committee wrihm a period of 15 days imm the date sf receipt of a ‘,5‘ PETiTiONER Rishikesh Gupta Versas RESPGNEENTS State sf Chhattisgarh & Othars copy of this ower. Thereafter, the Cammitiee shau issue wmtice i0 %he pemiener and officers coecemee within a further pericd of 1§ §ays. The CommMee shaia conswer and pass order, in accortiance with iaw, afier affording proper oppartunity of hearing to the petitioner. The oetiticner and the officers concerned may file addiiionai documents, if necessary. The eniire exercise, inciuding payment of reéieal dues, ifany, io the petitioner, be compie‘ied within a period of four monrhs from the date of receipt of a copy of this onier. The petitioner shaii supply one compiete set of the petition to the State counsei for transferring the same to the Committee; in case of grievance with regard to non-payment of pensionery ues: it is not necessary to fiie a writ petition before this Court directiy. The representationiappiication can he movect before the Pension Committee as stated above. The Pension Committee shat! not refuse to entertain the representation/appiication, if- so fiied directlv. Sd/- 1.: i ‘ ,Satish Judge K. Agnihotri-l i i d