IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1090 of 2011 along with CWP Nos. 1094, 1095, 1132, 1133, 1134, 1177, 1220, 1221, 1223, 1225, 1229 and 1237 of 2011 Date of decision: 18.3.2011. 1. CWP No. 1090 of 2011 Rajinder Kumar vs. State of H.P. and ors. 2. CWP No.1094 of 2011 Surender Pall vs. State of H.P. and ors. 3. CWP No. 1095 of 2011 Desh Raj vs. State of H.P. and ors. 4. CWP No. 1132 of 2011 Narian Dass vs. State of H.P. and ors. 5. CWP No. 1133 of 2011 Narender Pall vs. State of H.P. and ors. 6. CWP No. 1134 of 2011 Paras Ram vs. State of H.P. and ors. 7. CWP No. 1177 of 2011 Vijay Kumar vs. State of H.P. and ors. 8. CWP No. 1220 of 2011 Dharam Singh vs. State of H.P. and ors. 9. CWP No. 1221 of 2011 Man Singh vs. State of H.P. and ors. 10. CWP No. 1223 of 2011 Roshan Lal vs. State of H.P. and ors. 11. CWP No. 1225 of 2011 Gajan Ram vs. State of H.P. and ors. 12. CWP No. 1229 of 2011 Joghal Ram vs. State of H.P. and ors. 13. CWP No. 1237 of 2011 Lekh Raj vs. State of H.P. and ors. …2… Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.K. Ahuja, Judge. For the respective Petitioners: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Mr. Pushpender, Mr. Y.S. Thakur, H.K. Paul and B.S. Thakur, Advocates . For the Respondents-State :Mr. R.K.Bawa, A.G. with Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Addl. A.G. and Mr. J.K. Verma, Dy.A.G. Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. (Oral) The petitioners claim work charge status, arrears, pension and other consequential benefits from the date they completed eight years of service. Reliance is placed on the decision of this Court dated 28th July, 2010 rendered in CWP No. 2735 of 2010, titled Rakesh Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others. The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioners may file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the second respondent within a period of one month from today. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioner concerned will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment referred to in this judgment while submitting the representation(s). …3… 2. With the above observations, the writ petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending application(s) if any. (Justice Kurian Joseph), Chief Justice. March 18, 2011. (Justice V.K. Ahuja), (tilak/pankaj) Judge.