B IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBILASPUR, (C.G.l MZ^-I W.P. NoF 72005 PETITIONER: ^o^-:':s&^' ^YN \^-n^t!-" ^ \t-T-> ^s' ;<,^,o.--' lyyi->..--" V:''' _^.'; x^'v'.-"" v^f:y"i RESPONDENTS: VERSUS 1. Rabi Bhushan Sharraa Aged about 46 years S/0 Shri Haribansh Sharnia Presently working as Officer at the Rajnandgaon Branch of Dena Bank R/0 HIG-I/462, New Borsi Extension Durg (Chhattisgarh) Dena Bank (duly constituted under the Banking Companies Acquisition Act, 1971) Through Regional Manager Office Rukmini Bhawan, Near Jairain Complex, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) SM"li Bi 111 Bi ^ISN^ •'-'9s: 3i!>-<it- ':^2® 2. Deputy General Manager (Personnel)(Appellate Authority) Dena Bank, Head Office Dena Corporate Centre C-10, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex Bandra East, Murabai (Maharashtra) 3. Assistant General Manager (Disciplinary Authority) Dena Bank, Regional Office Raipur (Chhattisgarh) PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIQRARJ AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER: -_&S_stated above in the cause title. ENTg:__ XI-HC-22 311^1'3RI R-ii* sn^i *tii«B"gf?g :H/- ^^IPTRPT; ^Ttly'tti, fadwy fT^SK _ ,. _ '' : '\^^Mr2-^/^ ___........r*\/.*.|..';..T—^...»*....: KINMIWIIia' ~ ' ^t '" '3ii^i¥RnwHi%g •'-:••;«:• 2t-12-2005 Shri Jitehdra PaM, co'mi; Applicatiba fortlrgeatK^aiiQgisanowed. Heard, Leamed .counscl for th' .posted as Bratoch Manager in theperKidiy 1172000 to 2q/3/2004. It is fiu-fchEr submitted that oit 6/4/ 2004 Uie petitioner ^wa^ subniitted the i-eply; hut (he, lower grade. Agam.st, this, said appeal has riot 'beea decidi decided toy respoadent no.2 as of the case, iit ftte opiliion of CM^<tt<ll'l ^IH^f'^fe^ '^?^R ^siPgwan^r el for fhe petitioner. ; petitioner subniits tHat fhe petitipner was Dejia' Bank, SeGtor 10 Branch, Bhilai dui-mg seived " wifh a • charg& sbeet regardiag the trregularities coiiuuitted bv faijja diuing the aforesaid period, The petifiQaer jiisGiplii]ar5r aytliori]ty has impQsed a. penalty vide Aiuiexure-P^G dated '28/,p/ 2005 wliereby he' Iiasl been -i?everted t6 fye the petitioner prefemed an appeal as per. Annexure'-P/? : dated 279/20^5 Uefore fhe respondejat no.'2, ,wKo is ftte appeUate authority. I.t is sufcni^tted fhat aow sixmonths have passed liut fye •dS6 far Couasel for fhe petitio^er prays fhat ttie.aforGsaid appeal inay ye eady as pQssible. Having cpnsiaered and •ijnfhout expressing any opinion on fhe laeriis piis Courf, eads ofjustice will be served ifa directipn is given to.responde^it no.2 to decide the appeal (Aiuiexure-P/J) ( preferred by the petitioner on i|ts own laerits ia aceordaiice with law as eariy as possible prefeiably \vithin| production oftKe certified .cop^ Certified copv as per nllel ^.:-:'" .••-•- - •:.'.. ,' a. penod af two inQB.th.s from : fhe date <»f oftfusbrderbefoichun.IfaQygEievance sl ^'t.ci reiiiains, tbe petitioaer ia.af ay^S. the reiaedy'available uader tbe law,. . Wi/th fhe aioresaid obseT^jations^ ffais petitioii stands^disposecl (A' ' { ' ^ •i^ Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge :~^u: f ; ^s