IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15261 of 2010 1. MUNNA YADAV, SON OF LATE RAJENDRA YADAV 2. SUBODH MANDAL, SON OF BELI MANDAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.15587 of 2010 DINESH YADAV, SON OF LATE CHALITAR YADAV Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.15995 of 2010 RAM CHANDRA SAH, SON OF LATE RASSO SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR with Cr.Misc. No.21630 of 2010 CHANDAN SEIKH @ TANMA @ TANVIR @ TANNO, SON OF MD. ZALO Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 01.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the deceased was called away by co-accused Sunil Sharma and thereafter he was done to death allegedly by the accused persons named for the reasons of earlier dispute between the parties. It has been submitted and also supported by the A.P.P. that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and the entire case is based on speculation since there was some rivalry between the families of the prosecution and the deceased. 2 Considering the same, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Naugachia, in Naugachia P.S. Case No. 09 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and the other shall be the father/wife of the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv)That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)