THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.6789 of 2006 Dated:06.04.2006 Between: Smt.M.Nirmala. ..... PETITIONER AND The State of A.P. rep. by its Prl.Secretary, Revenue Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.6789 of 2006 ORDER: The petitioner filed a writ petition, being W.P.No.24278 of 2004, seeking a direction to the respondents to issue house site patta to her in the land allotted to the Deccan Welfare Association. By an order, dated 28.12.2004, this Court disposed of the said writ petition with such a direction. After considering the orders of this Court and the application of the petitioner dated 27.05.2004, the Mandal Revenue Officer issued a memo bearing No.B/504/05, dated 28.04.2005, rejecting the request of the petitioner. Aggrieved by the same, the present Writ Petition is filed after lapse of one year. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner’s request for allotment of house site was rejected on the ground that the land in Survey No.488 is classified as Grama Kantam, a large number of persons were given house site pattas and this would amount to discrimination. This Court is afraid, the submission is wholly misconceived. A reading of the impugned memo, which is self- explanatory, reveals as under. As stated by the petitioner the Deccan Welfare Association and Smt.Saraswathamma are not allotted any piece of land in Sy.No.488 situated at Malkaram, Jawaharnagar Village. Further there is no vacant land is available and her possession in Sy.No.488 is not recorded as stated above and as you alleged that the land was allotted to Smt.Saraswathamma in Sy.No.488. In compliances to the orders of the Honourable High Court in W.P.No.15252/94 the R .D .O ., R.R.East Division has given order in file No.B/6170/94, dt.30.07.1997 by rejecting the plea of Smt.Saraswathamma for allotment of land in Sy.No.488 Smt.Saraswathamma is one of the petitioner in above said W.P. Hence your request for issue of House site patta Certificate is hereby rejected. The petitioner appears to have approached this Court making a false submission that the land was allotted to the Deccan Welfare Association, which was, as found by the Mandal Revenue Officer, never allotted such land. Therefore, this Court does not find any right that can be enforced in these proceedings. The Writ Petition is therefore, dismissed. No costs. ____________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 06.04.2006 vs