FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 877 OF 2008 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1051 OF 2008 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 877 OF 2008 __________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, apperances, Court's orders or Court' s or Judge's orders directions and Registrar's orders Mr.Prashant Patil i/by. M/s.C.P.& Associates, adv.for appellants. Mrs.Geeta Joglekar, adv.for BMC/respondent. Coram: Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota J. Dated : 28 th August, 2008. P.C. : 1. This Appeal is preferred to challenge the ad-interim order dated 21st August, 2008 passed by the Bombay City Civil court. The appellants is a registered association of persons which has filed the instant suit to restrain the respondent, Mumbai Municipal Corporation from demolishing the structures of the members without following due process of law. The application for ad-interim reliefs is rejected by the learned Judge on the ground that the subject matter of the suit is nowhere described in the plaint. Perusal of the plaint confirms this position. What is annexed at Exhibit-B is a mere list of members of the appellant with some dimensions mentioned against the names. If the property in respect of which an order of injunction is to be granted is not described, the plaint is rendered vague. The court has rightly rejected the application for ad-interim reliefs. This Appeal from Order is dismissed in limine. 2. Mr.Patil submits that the plaintiffs are ready to amend the plaint in order to give description of the structures of its members in the plaint. The appellants are at liberty to make an appropriate application before the trial court for the purpose. 3. As the appeal from order itself is disposed off, the Civil Application does not survive and the same is accordingly disposed off. [JUDGE]