c-^ /s^)7 (-^- @ BEFORETHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION fSl No. 5^°> /2010 ff^^ PETITIONER Chandrakant Singh Chauhan , S/o Late Madhusudan Singh, Aged about 54 years, R/o Sitlapara, Kanker District North Bastar Kanker, C.G. VERSUS RESPONDENTS PA"^ »?° .^•:^^ ^^.e^n0^' \-.^:-" s \~y ;<^"^"' State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Scheduled Tribe and Scheduled Caste Development, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, C.G. District Education officer Kanker District North Bastar (Kanker), C.G. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Kanker District North Bastar (Kanker), C.G. District Treasury Officer, Treasury Kanker District North Bastar (Kanker), C.G. ^" WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA The above named petition.er-beas-^^-"'—"- ,/^,t;»iVitt(.'^ ^..''"' \^ ^ ¥ --HC—78 ^£T•^WMil, Hltll-M'Ko, fs<dl'Mlj,< Vs.t^t^.l^^fzoiQ 3tl^fq5RT( ani?i wf?=?Ri' ^T 3TT^T ^iHft^ WlfeqhT-qrcS •?fei^ tf^re^ ^sfRmsu^i 8: Hon'MeShri IVIanlndra IWohan|Shriyastava,.L 14.0S.2010 [ Shri Vimlesh Bajpal, counsel ^orthe petltioner. Ms. Sunlta Jain, Panei La'j»i?yer for the State/respondents. advance copy. With the consent of learned t;ounsel for the parties, the petition is heard finally. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits ihat the petitioner wa; appointed initialiy on a fixed pay-s<j;ale on probation. After coiTipletion o" probation' period, the petitioner wa| granted regular pay-sca!e. Learned counsel further submits that the tissue involved in the case is as to whether the petitioner is entitled toj regular pay-scale with effect from the date of initial appolntment or after c|3mpletion of probation period. The issue involved herein w|s considered by the Madhya Pradesn State Administrative Tribunai, Jabi|lpur (for short 'the SAT"} in O.A. No. others Vs. ofM.P. & others), wherein it was he!d that the sim|!arlv situated teachers are entitled to regu!ar pay-scale w.e.fthe date ^f initial appointment. The matter was taken up to the Supreme Courlj. The appeat was dismisseci by the Supreme Court, upholding the de|;ision of the SAT to the effect that the Teachers/Assistant Teaohers are |entit!ed to regu!ar pay-scale from c'ate of initia! appointment. "2^\ W.fljt.Wt.-.a i!;..i.t6 ;.-.ii>,wmm»nwuwn> -""":?fe. y' •A '^s ';l I?' '©ia.. ii '!®*|i|fe '% . 'J @) I-HG—78 "Sv; ^|<1|<-iq, ®tl|^'|6,fs)01'(4y,< .^:1^.^:.1^^° •f sfi^r'ira^Cicifj'^r: sn^iw R-)!<* 'cTSJTSFfT^T ss?ff^i Trmane ?wiwnf?gsnt?r I-- in vjew ofthe above submissiorls the same terms l.e., the petitione) representation, if so advised, to consic|i its perepecti'/e. If the petitioner standsj passed. by the SAT in Madhu!<ant\ confirmed by the Supreme Court No. 6892/93 by order dated 3.1.19941 same reiiefaccordingiy. chi^[<rt'fii 'RT^ff ^ f^sl' <f^^R ^aTRnaii^n », the wn't petition is disposed of in is granted liberty to make a ler his case on its own merit and in on the same footings as per order Yadu (supra) and subsequently in Special ieave Petition (Civil; the petitjoner may be entitied to Sd/- Manindra Mohan Judge Shrivastava