^ ..'•>' / <,'&'• ./' J^ ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JCDICATURE AT BXLASPUR ,CHi»TTISGARH WRIT PETITION [,L^;;LOS' 2001 Anbey Bai wifeof Sh-M Trat aged^_years, Sutfpanch- Gram Paachsyat r/o VJ.llage Chaurabhata, Grani Panchayat Avareedh Block-Nawagarh,Tahsll- Nawagarh.Distrj.et - Janjgir. Champa (C.G) Add-Ltioaal Collector Janjgir-Champa (C.G) Prescr.Lbea authority being ^. Su^.Di.visj.oaal off.Lcer- JanJglr-Chanpa, Tab-Nawagarh Dlstt- Janjgir<:harapa(CG) / Presid-LBg officer in the-^^- mattec of No Confidence- Motlon dated 3.3.2001 being Tahsilder, Nawagarh Chhat S.am, s/o Jbadurara Raghuram s/o Bacbharara Lashnunarayan Dhiwar s/o Hetram Dhlwar Fekarara yadav, s/o Makunda YaSav Laksl-m.ln Bal Sahu wife of Jeevan Lal Sahu S'nr^mat.i. sukanya Thakur wife of Rajiv Singb Ramkirtan Srivas, s/o Tangu Srivas Velsuraro Dhiwar, s/o Shriram Dhlwar Fel Baj. Dhiwar wife of Vishrsm Dhiwar Barsaitram Kashyap s/o Saheblal Kashyap Samelal Sahu, s/e chhedram itor 2 ^ ^ 15. Shantibal wife of Dayaram Dhiwar 16 e Sahas Bai wife of Oiianiram Kashyap 17^ AraAAka Baj. wjLfe of Haldar Kashyap 1Q^7 Son Bal, wj.fe of Bal-trani Kashyap 19. Radthilavan s/o Manrno'han Kashyap IQ^ Brajmohan Kashyap a/0 Seetaram Kashyap £> Ramsanehi Kashyap s/o Raffiadhar Kashyap Rampirset Rsa Kashyap 8/0 Sahasram Kashyap Ramrath Sahu, s/o 22 23 Respondents 4 to 23 are panchas Gram Pancbayat,Avareedh, Tahsll. Nawagarh. Djlstt- Jagjg.i.r Champa EETITION UNDER THE ARTICIJE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITaTION OP JISIDXA FOR ISSUAtCg OP imiT INTHE N&TURE OF CERTIORARI MAMDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS, DIRECTION OR DIKECTIONS, ORDER OR QRDSRS : ^l^^i^~^r^f PT, ;?'?n'<-i)is, isStyii<-i:i'i. STfiRT 'T^B? W.P.No.452/2001 ^S'HC'^ ^S^E^ ?^ 3^!'!. ^l ! r^p"siR;% WZTR' ^TR^ft ^. FsTSt Th ^ STV^R 5'TF^F [^.^•^^^w^ Thls matter was heard jresterday. were produced, this (pourt needed a been casfc by the petiti4>ner. Tbe admitted fact ln the e as 21 ttie pe^itloiar« No Cotifidence Motion I there is no [Tfti^f^ <-lt<1 -^^ -Po; W-^4^ ,?re?;^I ra 3^1 WK ^T^f sn^l ?CTIW w??i ^^^41^ l-?ii-i^ ^ tS^ Ts^R^R ^srrar sn^r O » £v *i » ballot papers. I am notjan ex^ert. I have simj looked an<i in fact exam.i.r}ed to the best of my abili.ty markjings are not o£ equal siee aaa are of different sijzes in there . the markinss in my favour o£ thfi No Con£idei<ce of marking. However, and are cleerly in very clear, ink 1s clear marking. In fiiew not an expert) I am votes/ballot parers wejce result, no infcerference is called for. Accord- petition is dismj.ssed. Iiet over to Eteep Ke^harwani in sealed ....\ n. '•vy:^i ys^ ,ul. .i<o\Jt A^ Sd/- Ouef Justice -_- ._L