:1: IN IN IN THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3291 OF 2008 IN F.A.NO.149 OF 2001 Vasant L. Naik. ..Applicant. Vs. The MunicipalCorpn. of Gr. Bombay. ..Respondent. Ms. Deepa Sawant i/by C.G.Gavnekar for the Applicant. Mr.J.J.Xavier for the B.M.C. CORAM: R.S. MOHITE, J. DATE : 27th June,2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The Advocate appearing for the B.M.C. states that the application submitted through Architect dated 24.5.2005 was disposed of as the scrutiny fee was not paid and therefore, regularisation proposal was not put up. He submits that if fresh proposal is made alongwith documents and scrutiny fee addressed to the Executive Engineer, Building Proposal, CT-VII E Ward, then the same will be considered and decided by speaking order after hearing the architect. The Advocate for the applicant states that the proposal of the architect will be filed within a period of three weeks from today. If such a proposal is filed, same should be considered and disposed of within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the same. Statements are accepted. In view of what is recorded in this order, civil application stands disposed off. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)