1 (1) S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3563/07 Sahab Ram & anr v. State & anr. (2) S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4157/06 Chetan Das & anr v. State & anr. Date of order: 10.2.2010 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr. LS Jodha for the petitioners. Mr. IS Pareek for the respondents. ... In S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3563/07, the learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the writ petition on behalf of petitioner no.1, therefore, the writ petition of petitioner no.1 is dismissed as withdrawn. These two writ petitions, S.B.Civil Writ Petition Nos.3563/07 and 4157/06 have been preferred to challenge the transfer order dated 15.7.2006 on various grounds and that transfer order was stayed by this Court vide orders dated 12.6.2007 and 6.9.2006. The petitioner's transfer orders of the year 2006 remained stayed for almost more than three years and there is no reason to keep these matters pending, as no purpose will be served when the petitioners are still working 2 on the post where they were working before passing of the transfer orders and the employers have right to take a decision of transfer, provided there is administrative exigency for passing the transfer order and the transfer order can be passed by the competent authority. The transfers orders of petitioner no.2 in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3563/07 and petitioners of S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4157/06, both dated 15.7.2006, are quashed with liberty to the respondents to pass a fresh order of transfer if any administrative exigency is there and that order can be passed by the competent authority. Both the writ petitions of the petitioners are allowed as indicated above. ( PRAKASH TATIA),J. mlt.