IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR. WJC No.1237 of 2010 VIRESH KUMAR SON OF SRI JAGDEEP PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST OFFICE KOKLAK CHAK, POLICE STATION AND BLOCK – NOORSARAI, DISTRICT NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF. 4. THE DY. S.P. HILSA, DISTRICT NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF. 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER KARAIE PARSURAI, DISTRICT NALANDA 6. OM PASWAN SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER POSTED AS PANCHAYAT SEWAK AS SECRETARY OF BERTHU GRAM PANCHAYAT, POLICE STATION AND BLOCK – KARAI PARSURAI, DISTRICT NALANDA. ----------- 02. 23.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prayer of the petitioner is that respondent nos. 2 and 3 shall make an enquiry against the respondent no. 6 for illegal withdrawal of the fund of the Gram Panchayat, Karai Parsurai within the district of Nalanda claiming himself, as Panchayat Secretary of the said Gram Panchayat whereas the petitioner was the Panchayat Secretary who was, of course, transferred from the said Panchayat by order dated 17.05.2010 which was later on stayed as contained in Annexure -1. Learned counsel for the State submits that for making the illegal withdrawal of the fund of Gram Panchayat by respondent no.6, the matter be looked into by the concerned authorities and petitioner can have no locus to make such request. Considering the submission of the parties since the allegation is for making illegal withdrawal on the part of the respondent no. 6, in case petitioner has no role in the illegal withdrawal in question he may not be held liable for the withdrawal. It is for the authorities concerned to look into the matter and take appropriate action. In view of the above, the writ application is accordingly disposed of. Jagdish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)