1 D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3799/2006 Pujyapad Goswami Shri Sheelu Baba V/s State of Raj. & ors. 22.4.2009 Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.Deepak Verma Hon'ble Mr.Justice Prakash Tatia Mr.J.P.Joshi for the petitioner. Mr.M.S.Singhvi for respondent no.4. Mr.S.R.Choudhary,Dy.Govt.Counsel for the State. In this petition, petitioner is challenging Notifications issued by the State under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Notices were directed to be issued to respondents, who had submitted their reply. In the reply, respondent no.4 has specifically contended that the said Notifications were subject matter of challenge in W.P.No.1467/06, which came to be decided on 24.5.2006. By the said judgment, validity of the Notifications, as mentioned hereinabove, has been upheld. Thereafter, the said judgment has been followed in another judgment pronounced in W.P.No.2292/06 on 4.5.2007. Both the aforesaid judgments have been passed by Division bench of this Court. In our considered opinion, in the light of the aforesaid judgments passed by Division Bench of this Court, wherein validity of Notifications issued by State under sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act has already been upheld, nothing survives in this petition. However, learned counsel for petitioner contended that the questions, which have been 2 projected in this petition, are different than what have already been decided. We are afraid that questions, which are tried to be projected, cannot be gone into, as the same would be hit by the principles of constructive res judicata. In the light of aforesaid discussion, this petition stands hereby dismissed, but with no order as to costs. (Prakash Tatia)J. (Deepak Verma)CJ Parmar