THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.29847 of 2010 and 23307 & 3415 of 2011 COMMON ORDER: These three writ petitions are connected in one way or the other with the appointment/approval of the Correspondent for Sri Ramana Maharshi Primary and High School, Proddatur, Kadapa District. Two sets of persons are claiming to be in the management of the institution and the society that established it. That gave rise to initiation of proceedings before various authorities. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. In one of the writ petitions being W.P.No.13940 of 2006, this Court passed an order on 31.08.2010, leaving it open to the petitioners therein to avail the remedy of revision under Section 90 of the A.P. Education Act, 1982. Interim order passed therein was also extended. The purport of that observation was the subject matter of W.A.No.705 of 2010. A Division Bench of this Court refused to interfere with the observation. The situation as of now is that the revision preferred by one of the petitioners in W.P.No.29847 of 2010 is pending with the Government i.e. respondent No.1 therein. Much of the dispute is about the arrangement to be continued during the pendency of the revision. To avoid further complications in the matter, this Court is of the view that the arrangement of payment of salaries directly to the Teachers may be continued till respondent No.1 in W.P.No.29847 of 2010 disposes of the revision and that the disposal of the revision can be expedited. Hence, the writ petitions are disposed of, directing the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Education Department to pass orders on the revision filed by one of the petitioners in W.P.No.29847 of 2010, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after hearing the affected parties. The arrangement of payment of salaries to the Teachers directly shall be continued. However, no policy decision shall be taken by either group till the disposal of the revision. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J Dt:12.09.2011 Note: Issue c.c. in three days. (B/o) kdl This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents have not implemented the directions issed by this Court in the order, dated 20.07.2010 in W.P.M.P.No.33932 of 2010 in W.P.No.26568 of 2010. Today, the learned Government Pleader has placed before this Court, a copy of proceedings, dated 09.09.2011, through which the Project Officer, I.T.D.A., Paderu has admitted the petitioner to duty as the Date Processing Officer in I.T.D.A, Paderu. With this the order of this Court is implemented. Hence, the contempt case is closed. It is, however, directed that the petitioner shall be under obligation to report to duty at I.T.D.A. Seethampet, in which unit he has been appointed. 15 days time is granted to him after he reports to duty at Paderu. The Project Officer, I.T.D.A. Paderu shall issue necessary proceedings to the petitioner surrendering his services to the I.T.D.A. Seethampet.