THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B,PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2671 OF 2009 DT.03.02.2011 Between: U.Sridhar and four others ………….Petitioners. Vs. Kanna Bangaraiah and another ………….Respondents. O R D E R: The petitioner/respondent filed this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking to set aside the order dated 06.03.2009 passed by the VI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Fast Track Court, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District in C.M.A.No.103 of 2008, wherein the common order dated 19.03.2008 passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District, in I.A.No.460 of 2007 and 538 of 2007 in O.S.No.136 of 2007 was restored. The facts of the case in brief are that initially the respondents herein filed I.A.No.460 of 2007 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of C.P.C., seeking to grant ad-interim injunction restraining the petitioners/respondents and its men from interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment over the petition schedule property. The respondents also filed an application in I.A.No.538 of 2007 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 red with Section 151 of C.P.C., to grant ad-interim injunction restraining the petitioners/respondents from alienating or inducting third party interest over the petition schedule property. Initially, the trial court granted ex parte interim injunction and thereafter on an application filed by the respondents, the said order was restored. Thereafter, the trial court passed common order in both the applications by dismissing the said applications. Aggrieved by the same, the respondents herein filed C.M.A.No.103 of 2003 on the file of VI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Medchal. By order, dated 06.03.2009, the appellate court passed an order, by allowing the appeal. Aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition is filed. While admitting the revision petition, this court by order, dated 26.06.2009 granted interim suspension as prayed for. After going through the entire material, I am of the view that the appeal filed by the respondents herein against the common order passed by the trial court in two interlocutory applications is not maintainable. Hence, the revision petition is disposed of directing the trial court to dispose of the suit within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till then, the interim order passed by this court, dated 26.06.2009 shall continue. No order as to costs. __________________ B.PRAKASH RAO J., Dt.03.02.2011 Tjs.