IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE 3RD NOVEMBER 2011 / 12TH KARTHIKA 1933 WP(C).No. 27371 of 2011(V) ---------- -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ M/S.TIME ADS AND PUBLICITY,PARAMMEL HOUSE,SHENOY ROAD,KALOOR, KOCHI-17,REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER MRS.DEEPA SEBASTIAN AGED.35. BY ADV. SRI.LAL K.JOSEPH SRI.A.A.ZIYAD RAHMAN SMT.M.C.SANITHA SRI.SHIRAZ BAVA.V.S. SRI.N.MUHAMMAD SAJU RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------ 1. THE UNION OF INDIA,REP.BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE,NEW DELHI 110 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS) OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX (APPEALS), KERABHAVAN,KOCHI-11. 3. ASSISTANT INCOME TAX COMMISSIONER, CIRCLE 2(2),C.R.BUILDINGS,PRESS ROAD, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA R1 TO R3 BY SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/11/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: STU WP(C).No. 27371 of 2011(V) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS : EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 23/12/2010 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 23/12/2010 EXHIBIT P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE CALCULATION SHEET IN THE INCOME TAX COMPUTATION FORM. EXHIBIT P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL IN FORM NO.35 UNDER RULE 45 OF THE INCOME TAX RULES. EXHIBIT P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION OF STAY. EXHIBIT P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PASSED AN ORDER DTD 28/09/2011. EXHIBIT P7 : TRUE COPY OF THE TAX PAYER COUNTER FOIL. EXHIBIT P8 : COPY OF THE COMPUTERISED RECEIPT EVIDENCING THE PAYMENT OF RS. 5,00,000/-. EXHIBIT P9 : COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD 27/10/2011. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE. STU S.SIRI JAGAN, J. ================== W.P.(C).No. 27371 of 2011 ================== Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2011 J U D G M E N T Against Ext.P1 assessment order, the petitioner has filed Ext.P4 appeal along with Ext.P9 stay petition before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner seeks a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P9 stay petition expeditiously. Having heard the learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department also, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P9 stay petition, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Till orders are passed on Ext.P9, coercive recovery proceedings for recovery of the disputed tax shall be kept in abeyance. Sd/- sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE ///True copy/// P.A. to Judge