1 WP. 2570.2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. WRIT PETITION NO. 2570 OF 2009 (Smt. Vijaya Arjunrao Jadhav VS. The State of Maharashtra and ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's Orders Mr. Santosh S. Jadhavar, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V.B. Ghatge, A.G.P. for the respondent-State Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent no.2 Mr. B.T. Bodkhe, Advocate for the respondent no.3 ... CORAM : SMT. NISHITA MHATRE & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 06.07.2011 P.C.:- 1. The petitioner approached this Court contending that the University should be directed to declare her result of the examination of the B.P.Ed. course. It appears that result has been withheld because the petitioner was overage when she appeared for the examination. Admittedly, the petitioner was 46 years of age at that point of time. 2. Ordinance 371 relating to the B.P.Ed. course provides that a candidate who desires to appear for the Degree of Bachelor of Physical Education should not be above the age of 35 years or in the case of Teachers deputed from a school, they should not be above the age of 40 years. 2 WP. 2570.2009 3. In these circumstances, we see no reason to entertain the Petition in our extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction. Petition rejected. Sd/- Sd/- arp [M.T. JOSHI, J. ] [SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.]