:1: :1: :1: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2124 OF 2006. WRIT PETITION NO. 2124 OF 2006. WRIT PETITION NO. 2124 OF 2006. Ranjanben Ramniklal Sawla. ..Petitioner. Versus. The State of Maharashtra. & others. ..Respondents. --- with WRIT PETITION NO. 2125 OF 2006. with WRIT PETITION NO. 2125 OF 2006. with WRIT PETITION NO. 2125 OF 2006. Ramniklal Jethalal Sawla. ..Petitioner. Versus. The State of Maharashtra. & others. ..Respondents. --- K. R. Tiwari i/b M/s. K. R. Tiwari & Co., for the petitioners. Piyush Shah for the respondent nos. 5 to 13. Aniruddha Joshi a/w I. S. Patwardhan for respondent no.4. A. S. Pai A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & S.R.SATHE JJ S.R.SATHE JJ S.R.SATHE JJ DATE: NOVEMBER 28, 2006. DATE: NOVEMBER 28, 2006. DATE: NOVEMBER 28, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard. The petitioner’s premises were demolished by the MHADA under SRA scheme and alternate transit accommodation has also been given to the petitioner. When the premises were demolished, according to the petitioner, the petitioner was in Court prosecuting the petition for getting stay to the action of the MHADA. Now that civil petition has been finally disposed of upto the stage of the Supreme Court and the :2: :2: :2: action of the MHADA has been approved. Under these circumstances, the petitioner has approached to this Court for getting her articles back which were removed by the MHADA officers in her absence. . Learned A.P.P. Smt. A.S.Pai states that while carrying out demolition action the panchnama of the articles which were removed from the premises was prepared by the MHADA officers in presence of the panchas, and as per the said panchnama the goods will be returned to the petitioner immediately when the petitioner approaches the authority. In view of the statement made by the learned A.P.P. Smt.A.S.Pai, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will approach the MAHDA tomorrow, i.e., 29.11.2006 at 12.00 O’clock in the noon. The officers of the respondents state that if the petitioner approaches by that time, goods as per the panchnama will be given to the petitioner. In view of this nothing survives in this petition. Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that since the grievance of the petitioner is redressed, he may be allowed to withdraw this petition. Accordingly, petitions are allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such. :3: :3: :3: (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) :sac/2006/sathe/