1 mca71-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rpa MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.71 OF 2010 Bhakti Manish Salvi .. Applicant V/s. Manish Dattatrya Salvi .. Respondent ..... Mr. Rahul Singh i/b. Mr. Prabha Badadare for the applicant. Mr. M. D. Alwe for the respondent. ..... CORAM : A. S. OKA, J. DATE : APRIL 15, 2011. P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. The prayer is for transfer of the Marriage Petition filed by the respondent-husband in the Family Court at Mumbai to the Family Court at Pune. It is contended that the applicant is a resident of Pune and the respondent is a resident of Mumbai. It is contended that the application for maintenance filed by the applicant is pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate at Pune. It is contended that it is inconvenient for the applicant to attend the proceedings in the Family Court at Mumbai. 2 mca71-10 2. I have considered the submissions. It must be noted that the custody of the minor child is at present with the respondent- husband. Moreover, the application for maintenance filed by the applicant in the Court at Pune has been already rejected. As the custody of the minor child is with the respondent-husband. Therefore, the respondent has to look after the minor child. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that the respondent is ready and willing to pay necessary amount for meeting the travelling charges of the applicant from Pune to Mumbai for attending the proceedings in the Family Court, Bombay. The statement is accepted. 3. Hence, no case is made out for passing an order of transfer. Application is rejected. The learned Judge of the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai will fix appropriate amount payable to the applicant by way of reimbursement of the expenditure incurred on conveyance. JUDGE