IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.1236 of 2010 PASHUPATI NATH MISHRA & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR ----------- 02. 19.08.2010 The petitioners are aggrieved by the order of cognizance passed in Complaint Case No. 138 of 2008 by which the Judical Magistrate, 1st Class, East Champaran at Motihari under Sections 323, 324, 341, 504 and 34 IPC. The background of the case is that initially a complaint was filed which was sent to the police under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. and thereafter the complainant filed another complaint. In the FIR with regard to the same occurrence charge-sheet was submitted against two persons whereas final report was submitted with regard to the rest of the accused persons. In the complaint petition cognizance has been taken against all the accused persons. In my view, the order of cognizance calls for no interference for this reason and it will suffice if both the cases are amalgamated. The present case is therefore directed to be amalgamated with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 16 of 2008 dated 23.01.2008. With this observation, this application is disposed off. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)