IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. 66686-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION : 15.12.2006 Anil and another .... PETITIONERS Versus State of Haryana ..... RESPONDENT CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL Present: Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Partap Singh, Senior DAG, Haryana. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No. 566 dated 23.9.2006 under Sections 308/323/34 IPC, registered at Police Station City Fatehabad, have filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of anticipatory bail. I have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through the contents of the FIR. Vide order dated November 6, 2006, after hearing counsel for the parties, interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners subject to their joining investigation. Counsel for the petitioners states that in terms of the aforesaid interim order, the petitioners have joined the investigation. The State counsel does not dispute this fact. In view of the above, without commenting on the merits, the interim bail, granted vide order dated November 6, 2006, is made absolute subject to the same terms and conditions. Disposed of accordingly. December 15, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE