IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.17788 of 2010 UPENDRA SINGH . Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 02/ 15/6/2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order of rejection notices that no case under Sections-326 or 307 appear to have been made out as the injuries were simple and yet proceeds to reject anticipatory bail for reasons of those very provisions. Considering the submission, only for the purposes of bail, let the petitioner above named surrender before the court below within four weeks when he shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No.56/2010 subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) Cr.P.C. KC ( Navin Sinha, J.)