1 mgj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Company Petition No.569 of 2009 Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited ..Petitioner vs. Truefit Engineering Company Limited ..Respondents Mr.Rahul Mehta i/b Ms.Disha Karambar for petitioner. Mr.Rahul Gamgirde, authorised representative of the petitioner present. Mr.Satish Bejai i/b Bejai and Co. for respondents Mr.Sudhakar K.Bangera Managing Director of respondent company present. CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA J. 27th August, 2009 P.C. 1 This company petition is filed by the petitioner seeking winding up of the respondent company on the ground that the respondent company is unable to pay its debts. The parties have today tendered consent terms dated 27th August, 2009 which are signed by the authorized signatory of the 2 petitioner and the Managing Director of the respondent who are present in Court. The consent terms are also signed by the Advocates for the petitioner and respondents respectively. The learned Advocates for the parties have sought an order in terms of the consent terms. The said consent terms are taken on record and marked X for identification. It is clarified that the petition is disposed of in terms of the consent terms at X and the same shall stand revived in the event of the respondent failing to pay the installments as set out in the consent terms at X. The petition stands disposed of. (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.)