IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.V.SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 2036 of 2000 Between: 1 Secretary to Govt Education (SE) Department AP. Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Director of Government Examinations Govt of AP Hyderabad ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 Sulochana Saxena W/o Late Prakash Chandra Saxena Flat No. 7 Snelha Appartment , Asman Godh , Malakpet Hyderabad 2 Registar AP . Lok-Ayukta, Hyderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Aﬃdavit ﬁled herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a notice call for records relating to complaint a writ or Certiorari and quash or set aside the same as erronious and without jurisdiction and further prayed that section 17 (3) of Andhra Pradesh Lok -Ayukta, UPa- Lokayukta Act, 1983 is un-constitution to hold that the decisions of Lok Ayukta and Upa Lokayukta amenable to the judical review under Aricle 226 of the constitution of India and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.TRILOK BAHADUR SAHGAL The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.V. SANJAY KUMAR Writ Petition No. 2036 of 2000 Oral Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram) When this matter is listed for hearing, of the year 2000, there is no representation on behalf of the writ petitioners though the name of the learned Government Pleader for Services is set out in the cause list. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. The interim order granted by this Court on 10.04.2000 and made absolute on 23.02.2001 stands dissolved. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J. ______________________ P.V. SANJAY KUMAR, J. Date: 14.11.2008 Nsr