CW 2984/10 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2984/10 Dharam Singh Versus State & Ors. DATE OF ORDER : 05/04/2010 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Pankaj Jain, for petitioner *** Instant petition has been filed by one of the residents of Kalyanpur Saheta, Tehsil, Hindaun, Karauli assailing allotment made to respondent No.4 u/s.101 of Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 vide order dt.15th January, 1971. It appears from the record that after land was allotted to respondent No.4 in 1971, no grievance at one point of time was raised almost after 38 yrs. But, a complaint was made on 23rd October, 2008 to the Collector, Karauli, who directed the Tehsildar to inquire into the matter and the Tehsildar submitted its report on 3rd June, 2009 and the factual report also does not disclose any adverse in regard to allotment made. However, in Para 4, it has been observed that because of amenity amongst residents of local area, grievance has been raised by one of the local residents assailing the order of allotment made way back in 1971. Counsel for petitioner submits that respondent No.4 concealed the material fact while allotment was made in 1971 and he is encroaching upon the land in addition to what was allotted to him. CW 2984/10 [2] What has been urged by Counsel for petitioner is not supported by any material on record and apart from it, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the act of respondent No.4 either on encroaching upon the land or in regard to allotment made to him, remedy is available to the petitioner under Rajasthan Land Revenue Act. This Court is not inclined to exercise its discretionary powers U/Art.226 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, writ petition is without merit and the same stands dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA2984CW10 05-04.doc