(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 274 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 274 OF 2005 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 274 OF 2005 IN IN IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 41 OF 2003 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 41 OF 2003 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 41 OF 2003 Medha Gaurav Talekar ...Applicant Versus Gaurav Kaluram Talekar ...Respondent ..... Shri. M.R. Katikar, counsel for the Applicant Shri. M. R. Deshpnade, counsel for Respondent. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED: 16TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 16TH DECEMBER, 2005 DATED: 16TH DECEMBER, 2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned counsel for the Respondent. By this Civil Application the Applicant is seeking restoration of above Appeal. For the reasons stated in the Civil Application sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide. Hence, Civil Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Place the aforesaid Appeal for final hearing on 16.01.2006. *****