1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4280 OF 2008 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7449 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 15925 OF 2007 (WCL .v. Ganpat Gangaram Barde and others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's Orders and Registrar's orders. Shri A.S. Mehadia, Advocate for the applicant. Shri D.A. Sonwane, Advocate for the respondent Nos.1,2,3 and 5. Shri Y.B. Mandpe, AGP for the respondent Nos.6 and 7. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE, J. 03RD MARCH, 2009. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. This is an application for restoration of appeal against the respondent No.3. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the appeal was dismissed against the respondent No.3 and abated against the respondent No.4 by an order dated 01.04.2004 as no correct address of respondent No.3 was supplied. The learned Counsel for the applicant further submits that now the respondents are served and they are appearing through their Counsel before this Court. 2 For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7449 OF 2007 This is an application for condonation of delay. The reasons for causing delay are mentioned in para No.2 of the application. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the delay was purely unintentional and because of administrative difficulties. In my opinion, in the interest of justice, it will be appropriate to condone the delay subject to payment of costs of Rs.500/- to be paid to the respondent Nos.1,2,3 and 5. Civil Application is allowed. The delay is condoned. JUDGE *rrg.