IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.20 OF 2006 REVIEW PETITION NO.20 OF 2006 REVIEW PETITION NO.20 OF 2006 IN IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.2994 OF 2003 Narayan Yedu Rajguru .. Petitioner V/s The State of Maharashtra .. Respondents Mr.Bhagat i/by M/s.Ashoka Law Firm for the Petitioner. Mr.Niranjan Pandit, AGP for the Respondents. CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.M.KANADE, JJ. V.M.KANADE, JJ. V.M.KANADE, JJ. DATE : 8th August, 2006. DATE : 8th August, 2006. DATE : 8th August, 2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Petition, the Petitioner is seeking review of our order dated 19.12.2003 mainly on the ground that there has been suppression by the Respondents through their affidavit dated 18th December, 2003 filed by Mrs.Priya Hari Phadke, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Headquarter 3. The main grievance of the Petitioner is that it was not brought to the notice of this Court that the Hon’ble Chief Minister had granted stay with regard to the eviction. However, in paragraph No.6 of the aforesaid affidavit filed by Mrs.Priya Hari Phadke it has been clearly indicated that the stay earlier granted by the Hon’ble Chief Minister was cancelled. Under these circumstances, we do not find any ground for review of our order dated 19.12.2003. Hence, Review Petition stands dismissed. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (V.M.KANADE, J.) (V.M.KANADE, J.) (V.M.KANADE, J.)