IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.24945 of 2010 1. SANJAY RAI 2. Shatrudhan Rai Both are sons of Bijli Rai ----------Petitioners. Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 13.8.2010 Heard Learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that to justify non-payment of loan advanced by petitioner no.1 false and concocted story set up about snatching of Rs.10,000/- and abusing in name of informant’s caste, which according to the learned counsel for the petitioners, is not believable as there could be no occasion about having Rs.10,000/- while sitting near bamboo clump. As for another part of the offence concerning non-bailable offence under section 3(1)(X) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe(Prevention of Atrocities) Act caste name is not given with abuse. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, above named petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., West Muzaffarpur, in connection with Kathaiya P.S. case no.27 of 2009 ,subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh,J )