THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION N. 4012 & 4016 OF 2008 COMMON ORDER: Heard both sides. The petitioner herein is plaintiff, who files these revisions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interalia assailing the correctness of the order in dismissing the applications, where he sought for a direction permitting him to deposit monthly rent at Rs.3500/- from January, 2008 onwards and for deposit of Rs.42,000/- towards deposit. In a suit for injunction, filed by the petitioner, he came with the above applications treating himself as tenant, which was however disputed and contested on behalf of the respondent, the Court below having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, held that the petitioner has not approached the appropriate authority or Tribunal as contemplated under the law, seeking the relief, hence he is not entitled to any such indulgence. Hence, the revisions. Having heard the counsel for either side and on perusal of the material available on record, there is no reason warranting interference with the discretion exercised by the Court below. There are no merits in the revisions and accordingly the same are dismissed. No costs. __________________ B PRAKASH RAO,J DATE: 12.8.2010 TVK THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B PRAKASH RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION N. 4012 & 4016 OF 2008 Date: 12/8/2010