1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5999 OF 2008 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.25437 OF 2008 The State of Maharashtra ....Appellant Versus Janardan Vittal Keni (Deceased) through L.R.’s 1/1 Renubai Janardan Keni & Ors. ....Respondents And City Industrial Development Corporation ....Proposed Respondent. Shri S. V. Sonavne, AGP for the Appellant. Shri Sachin Punde for Respondent Nos. 1/2, 1/3, 2/1 to 2/3. Mrs. Geeta Mulekar for Respondent No.3-CIDCO. CORAM : P. B. MAJMUDAR & R. V. MORE, JJ. DATED : 13th AUGUST, 2009. P.C.: This is a Civil Application for adding CIDCO as a party respondent on the ground that it is a necessary party. Mr.Punde, learned Advocate for the Respondents/Original Claimants however states that CIDCO is not an acquiring body. Keeping this controversy open at the time of deciding the first appeal, the Civil Application is allowed by permitting CIDCO to be joined as additional Respondent in the First Appeal. The cause title of the First Appeal to be amended accordingly. The Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (R. V. MORE, J.) (P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.)