IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39566 of 2009 1. MALTI DEVI 2. PUNAM DEVI 3. GITA DEVI 4. AJAM TARA 5. ASHOK RAY 6. RAM SHATRUGHAN RAI Versus STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.40234 of 2009 1. SURESH RAI 2. RAMBABU RAI 3. RAJ KISHORE RAI 4. VIJAY SAH 5. SHEO KISHORE THAKUR 6. GANAUR PASWAN 7. DEEPLAL RAI 8. SITARAM SAHANI 9. AKHILESHWAR RAI 10. DEVENDRA RAI 11. RAMCHANDRA SAHNI 12. BRAHMDEO MAHTO 13. MAHINDRA PASWAN 14. PAPPU RAI 15. RAMBABU MAHTO 16. BISHWANATH THAKUR 17. NAWAL PASWAN 18. SANJAY MANDAL 19. RAM KISHORE PASWAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR . with Cr.Misc. No.46351 of 2009 1. VIJAY PASWAN 2. RADHA KRISHNA RAI 3. SANJAY KINKER Versus STATE OF BIHAR . ----------- 2. 18.01.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The defence on behalf of the petitioners is of false implication at the behest of a rival which it is apparent from the other F.I.R. lodged against the rival also. The allegations relate to a disturbance created by the petitioners as a member of larger mob by blocking road etc. after the elections were over to voice their dissent when the informant is 2 the Officer Incharge who had persuaded them not to do so. The difference in the defence and the allegations lies between democracy and mobocracy. The applications are rejected. Any application on behalf of lady petitioners shall be considered on the date that they surrender when the application for others is required to be considered on its own merits both without being prejudiced by the present order. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)