IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH, AT HYDERABAD HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO W.P. No. 24539 OF 2005 Date: 21.11.2005 BETWEEN: N. Jayarama Reddy …. PETITIONER And 1. The District Collector, Chittoor District, Chittoor, and others. …. RESPONDENTS HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO WRIT PETITION No. 24539 OF 2005 ORDER: Aggrieved by the order passed by the second respondent, the fourth respondent herein preferred a revision petition before the first respondent under Section 9 of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971. The first respondent by the impugned order dated 8.9.2005 ordered status quo, and directed the second respondent to implement the orders of status quo. The said order of the first respondent is assailed in this writ petition. At the stage of preliminary hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner rightly pointed out that by a reading of the impugned order, it is not clear as to whether the said order is final order or one in the nature of interlocutory order. Therefore, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (General) was directed to get instructions in the matter. Today, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, after getting instructions, submits that the impugned order is passed as an interlocutory measure, and the revision petition of the fourth respondent is still pending. Therefore, liberty is given to the petitioner to approach the first respondent and move appropriate application for vacating the status quo order. The Writ Petition, with the above observations, is accordingly disposed of at the admission stage. ______________ (V.V.S. RAO, J.) 21st November, 2005 Note: Issue C.C. in 2 days. (By order)/ Js.