IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR, WRIT PETITION (C) N0. ^^2-^ 12011 PETITIONER ^:^. <%-" <*' ^^ \' Vs RESPONDENT : Gram Panchayat Mahaveerganj, Tahsil Ramanujganj/ District Sarguja (C.G.) through its Sarpanch Shri Jethan Ram, son of Late Shri Ramkishan, aged 50 years, resident of Village Mahaveerganj, Janpad Panchayat Ramchandrapur, Tahsil Ramanujganj, District Sarguja (CG) 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, ^ Raipur. 2. Secretary, Departraent of Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. 3. Secretary, Department of Mines & Minerals, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. ^ 4. Secretary, Department of Revenue, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur. 5. Collector, District Sarguja 6. Annapurna Bajaj, wife of Shri Shyam Sunder Bajaj age not known to the petitioner. ^ 7. Jyoti Bajaj, daughter of Shri Shyam Sunder Bajaj age not known to the petitioner. 8. Udai Kumar Munshi, son of and age not known to the petitioner. No.6 to 8 are residents of Kartsaray Road, Upper Bazar, Ranchi (Jharkhand), presently residing at Mahavirganj, District Sarguja (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER RESPONDENT HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BSLASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) N0. 4825 OF 2011 Gram Panchayat Mahaveerganj Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. Present:- Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S.Murthy. Dy. Advocate General for the State. Q ORDER (Passed o". this 12tn day of December, 2011) 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents No.1 to 5 to take action against the respondent No.6 to 8 for illegal construction of the Graphite factory and directed to take appropriate action against the respondent No.6 to 8 on the applteation dated 20.06.2011 submitted by the petitioner, further seeks a direction to the respondents No.1 to 5, not to permit the respondents No.6 to 8 to oonstruct the Graphite factory and also take appropriate steps for restoring backthe land bearing old Khasra Nos. 2251/1,2290/1,2290/2, 2290/3, 2290/4, 2295/1 & 2295/2 as panchayat land. 2. Shri V.V.S.Murthy, learned Dy. Advocate General. on instructions, submits that the factory in question has already been closed. 3. Before passing any order to re-open the factory, the Grami Panchayat shall be intimated and proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner/Gram Panchayatbe afforded. 4. In view of foregoing, learned counsel appearing for the pet'rtioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in this matter. 5, Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Ashok