Criminal Revision No. 1479 of 2000 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. Criminal Revision No. 1479 of 2000 Date of Decision: 04.02.2008 Ranbir Singh and Another …Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and Another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA Present: Mr. Bipan Ghai and Mr. Sandeep Gahlawat, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr. Mehardeep Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent No.1-State. None for the respondent No.2. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) On disputed question of fact, this revisional Court has been called upon to set aside order framing the charge. I am afraid, version set out in the present revision petition contain all questions of fact, which can only be proved by adducing evidence. Furthermore, stay was obtained from this Court on 12.12.2000, relying upon judgment Satish Mehra v. Delhi Administration 1993 (3) R.C.R. 410 (S.C.). Criminal Revision No. 1479 of 2000 2 Learned counsel appearing for the petitions contents that the judgment in Satish Mehra's case (supra) has been over-ruled. He further states that since no stay was granted, trial may have concluded but he is not aware of the current status of the trial. Be as it may, question of fact cannot be determined by the revisional Court especially when they contain disputed facts. Simply because petitioner is projecting one version, order framing charge cannot be set aside. The present revision petition, devoid of any merit, is dismissed. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge February 4, 2008 “DK