Lk‘ y Petitioner %0$Emmmg Ewen (MAHEssHWARI) DIEEECTQR Mi-aHEiSHhQlRI RE§$ORT EXN§ £-EE.@aLTI1I ($33 pREVA T: ‘Lxm TED pus3HPAK NAGAR, P0311 NEHgim magaa, 1 B§ILAI — 490 20. \ i Var 811$ . ntS Ell . MU‘NICIPQL £4E)§}?QRF‘ TIQK? BHILAI Thtough : Comm13$ioner, Bhi hi Mun: ci pa. l Ccrporra ti on g $upala , Tah. & Distt. mm < HHATTmGARm . 2. PrapgrtymTax OEficer, aration, m ‘ Tan. & “D' st'c.EURG (Chhattisgarh) , r;”u ci§al Car G” i hilai, Supsla, MUNICIPAL coRPoazxT'Iom, DURG . > Through :— Commi$sion$r Municipal Corpsration, DURG (CG) . z mumu “Ak“LnuucuuuguU u u 4. Revenue Officer ' Qw.“ .v ' . J Municipal Cérpc atiqn, DURG (CG) . csnt&...2 ~ i‘ ..... 1' ‘: " , " ‘ , x wmmmmmwigg nag AucmmaH HG .MMDZ Om. XX 5 Nmmxxmmq Qua; , §§§ WRIT PE’I’l’I‘ION No. 2457 of2001 PE'I‘ITIONER : Gobardhau Palad (Mahashwari) VERSUS RESPONDENTS : Municipa} Corporatm Bhilai & Others. WRIT PE'i‘iTlON UNDER AR’I‘ICLE 226/227 OF TEE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SB: Hon’bie Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J. Present: Shri A. V. Shridhar. Aévocate appearing on behaif of Shxi V.G.Tamaskar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Brajesh Singh, Advocate appearing on bshal-fof Shri ASGaharwar, Advacata far the respondem No. l Ea 2. Shri Avinash Mishra, Advocate for the respondent N0. 3 & 4. URDER ORAL) (Passed an 30 &ay of Novembw, 2010) l. Learned eounsel appearing for the petitioner, on instinctions, submits that with the passage of time, this petition has booome imctuous. Learned counsei appearing for other side do not comroven the above sumission. b In vieyy of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become intiuctuous. Sd/- sau'sh K. Agnihou-i Judge .,,,7M \‘ HIGH COUR‘l‘ OF CHHKITISGARH AT BILASPUR i ', :f \