IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15165 of 2011 Sushil Paswan, S/O Late Siwan Paswan, R/O Village- Bhatsimar West, P.S.- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani. . . . . Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Block Development Officer, Rajnagar Madhubani. . . Respondents. ---------------------------------- 2/ 27.09.2011 The petitioner, who is a P.D.S. dealer within Rajnagar Block in the district of Madhubani, prays for quashing letter no.1513 dated 07.08.2011 and letter as contained in Annexure 1/1, issued by Block Development Officer, Rajnagar, Madhubani, whereby he has been directed to deposit of value of 72.38 quintals of undistributed rice at APL rate totaling Rs.99,000/-. The petitioner disputes the quantity of rice mentioned in the impugned notices. He further submits that he lifted 285.98 quintals of rice and distributed 280.98 quintals of rice. Thus, only 5 quintals of rice would remain in his stock. For the present I am not going into the merit of the rival case of the parties. Earlier similar matters had come up before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 (Awadh Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) & C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 (Suresh Prasad @ Raj Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The aforesaid writ applications have been disposed of by order dated 06.07.2011 after noticing the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. As the facts and issues are common, the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 would 2 also govern the instant writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 06.07.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 711 of 2011 and C.W.J.C. No. 757 of 2011 including interim protection as mentioned therein, with the condition that the petitioner would deposit the entire value of 5 quintals of undistributed rice within six weeks from today. The representation of the petitioner would be disposed of within further 10 weeks. Uday/ (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)