(1) CRI. WP. 937.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.937 OF 2010 Digamber Manohar Kadu and ors. PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and ors. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. M.R. Sonawane, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.H. Borade, A.P.P. for the respondent/State. ..... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 6TH DECEMBER, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. Heard learned Advocate for the petitioners. 2. The impugned order dated 20.9.2010 rendered by the learned Sessions Judge, Shrirampur is interlocutory one inasmuch as the petitioner was directed to deposit the amount of Rs.4500/- till further order and simultaneously notice was issued to the respondent as to why the interim order should not be confirmed into final order. The petitioners are at liberty to seek reduction of the amount while the application would come up for final hearing before (2) CRI. WP. 937.2010 the Court of Sessions. The learned Sessions Judge may consider the relevant aspects shown by the petitioners and the respondent in order to appropriately determine the amount of interim alimony. 3. With these observations, the Petition is dismissed. Sd/- [V. R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp