CLCON No. 44 of 2002 Hon. Irshad Hussain, J. None appear for the petitioner. Heard Sri Subhash Upadhyay learned counsel for the respondent. From the perusal of the counter affidavit of Sri Vidhya Sagar, it is evident that against the order of the court passed on 20.10.2001 the respondent preferred SLP and the Hon’ble Supreme Court directed to frame a scheme to regularize the workers and to decide the payment of wages to them. In pursuance of the order, scheme had been filed before the Apex Court and to decision has yet been given in that case. Considering above, there is no willful disobedience of the order of the court and therefore the petition is dismissed. Notice discharged. (Irshad Hussain, J.) Dated 7.11.2003 Rawat