IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA LPA No.1044 of 1996 SHARAD KUMAR, Son of Laxmeshwar Singh, resident of Village – Nirpur Bag, Police Station Patepur, District Vaishali Respondent- Appellant Versus 1. BABULA MANDAL, son of Ram Kishun Mandal, resident of Village – Mirapur Bag, Police Station – Patepur, District – Vaishali Petitioner-Respondent 2. The State of Biahr 3. Principal, Consolidation Training Centre, through Director, Consolidation, Bihar, Patna 4. Assistant Director, Consolidation, Vaishali 5. Consolidation Officer, Patepur, Vaishali 6. Ram Sagar Mandal, son of Boseri Mandal 7. Ram Pratap Mandal Son of Kuldip Mandal 8. Ram Kishore Kumar alias Kishore son of Umakant Jha 9. Lal Bahadur Singh son of Ramji Singh 10. Dilip Kumar son of Laxmeshwar Singh -All Respondent nos. 6 sto 10 are residents of Village – Nirpur Bag, PS Patepur, District –Vaishali ………Respondents-Respondents ----------- 05- 14.7.2009 None appears on behalf of the parties. This appeal under clause -10 of the Letters Patent of the High Court of Judicature of Patna, is directed against the order dated 22.8.96, passed by a learned single Judge in CWJC No.4799 of 1995 (Babulal Mandal @ Babu Ram Mandal vs. State of Bihar & Ors.), whereby the learned single Judge set aside the order of the learned revisional authority passed under the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, and has remitted the matter back to him for a fresh decision after consideration of all the documents and in accordance with law. Law is well settled that a superior court normally does not interfere with an order of remand. It is expected that the parties shall obey the remand order and allow the court below to dispose of the matter. We, therefore, do not find any ground for interference with the order. - 2 - 2. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. ( S K Katriar ) ( Jyoti Saran ) mrl