CRM NO. M-30994 OF 2010 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM NO. M-30994 OF 2010 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 28.01.2011 Gulzar Singh ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab ...Respondent A N D CRM NO. M-34971 OF 2010(O&M) Karamjit Kaur ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab ...Respondent A N D CRM NO. M-37088 OF 2010(O&M) Lakhwinder Kaur ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.C.PURI Present : Mr. B. S. Bhinder, Advocate, for the petitioner in CRM No. M-30994 of 2010. Mr. O. P. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner in CRM No. M-34971 of 2010. Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner in CRM No. M-37088 of 2010. CRM NO. M-30994 OF 2010 (O&M) -2- Mr. J. S. Sandhu, AAG, Punjab. Mr. B. S. Baath, Advocate, for the complainant. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) Vide this common order, I intend to dispose of three petitions bearing Crl. Misc. No. M-30994 of 2010 titled as, “Gulzar Singh vs. State of Punjab” , Crl Misc. No. M-34971 of 2010 titled as, “Karamjit Kaur vs. State of Punjab” and Crl. Misc. No. M-37088 of 2010 titled as, “Lakhwinder Kaur vs. State of Punjab”, as they have arisen out of the common FIR. As per allegations of the prosecution, Sarbjit Kaur has alleged that she is daughter of Kartar Singh. She has two sisters Karamjit Kaur and Lakhwinder Kaur. Karamjit Kaur and Lakhwinder Kaur, in connivance with Gulzar Singh, their uncle (Chacha) have got the mutation sanctioned in their names excluding the complainant. Gulzar Singh-petitioner requested for Power of Attorney to which she refused and thereafter, mutation was attested in Karamjit Kaur and Lakhwinder Kaur's name. Learned State counsel has submitted that Lakhwinder Kaur has submitted an affidavit in which she has admitted that Sarbjit Kaur is the daughter of Kartar Singh. The complainant has been deprived of her valuable rights to inherit the property. The property is alleged to have been sold. CRM NO. M-30994 OF 2010 (O&M) -3- The gravity of offence does not make out a case for grant of extra-ordinary relief of anticipatory bail. The case is at initial stage. Grant of bail to the petitioners who have connived together to deprive the complainant, would hamper the investigation. So, in view of the above discussion, all the three petitions are without any merit and the same stands dismissed. JANUARY 28, 2011 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE