IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.77 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.339 OF 2007 Kamlabai Vasant Lahane ...Petitioner V/s. Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Corpn. & Ors. ...Respondents ...... Mr.Shriram S.Redij for Petitioner. Mr.J.W.Mattos, A.G.P. for Respondents. ...... CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J. NOVEMBER 24, 2008. NOVEMBER 24, 2008. NOVEMBER 24, 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Leave to amend to mention the correct name of the Respondents. Amendment be carried out in the course of the day. 2. Counsel for the Respondents states that although no specific time frame is provided in the order dated June 3, 2008 to consider and decide the representation of the Petitioner, the Chief Officer : 2 : of the Mumbai Housing and Area Development Board shall ensure that the same is decided not later than four weeks from today. That assurance is accepted by the Counsel appearing for the Mumbai Housing and Area Development Board (Respondent No.2). 3. In view of the above, it is unnecessary to precipitate the matter any further. Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to revive this Petition in the event the Authority fails to dispose of the representation within assured time. In that case, the Court may consider to initiate action of aggravated contempt against the concerned Chief Officer. A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.