1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 308 OF 2009 1. Shri Rajaram Datta Naik, major, married, 2. Shri Bhanudas Datta Naik, major, married, Both r/o Chawdi, Pale Goa. .... Petitioners V e r s u s 1. Shri Datta S. Madkaikar, ( since deceased ) Through his legal representatives 1(a) Smt. Durga Datta Madkaikar, 1(b) Smt. Digambar Datta Madkaikar, 1(c) Smt. Rachana Vithal Naik, 1(d) Smt. Vithal Manguesh Naik, r/o Tisk, Usgao, Ponda Goa. 2. Directorate of Settlement and Land Records, Panaji Goa ... Respondents . Mr. S. D. Padiyar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. V. Menezes, Advocate for the Respondent nos.1(a) to 1(d). Mr. G. Shirodkar, Government Advocate for Respondent No.2. Coram :- A. H. JOSHI, J. Date :- 13 th AUGUST, 2009. 2 JUDGMENT 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. 2. Petition is called out for hearing by consent. 3. Heard both learned Advocates. Perused records. 4 Learned Revisional authority has observed in para no.6 of impugned order that impugned order was already implemented. It is also observed in the order that appeal was filed much late. 5. The finding recorded while deciding the application for stay that the prayer for stay has become infructuous is being met by urging that in the record maintained in Form No. I & XIV, names of the petitioners continue. 6. It is not denied or disputed that names of petitioners are omitted from index of properties. 7. In the midst of hearing learned Advocate for the petitioners states that he has instructions to withdraw the petition. Petition is therefore disposed as withdrawn. 3 8. Rule is discharged. A. H. JOSHI, J. at*