IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.15369 of 2009 BILASH YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 21.7.2009 The petitioner is an accused in a case under sections 147,148,149,309 and 302 of the I.P.C. and section 27 of the Arms Act. in which two persons have been killed. The allegation of firing is against co-accused, Arjun Yadav who shot Indal Mahto dead and he was acquitted. It is alleged that this petitioner and one Kedar Yadav shot at other person who died. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the other accused persons were acquitted in the trial wherein the trial court observed that the prosecution seems not interested in prosecuting the accused. He further submits that at the time of the trial, the petitioner was also in custody. He submits that by this time the petitioner has remained in custody for two years. In view of the fact that the allegation of firing is also against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is rejected. However, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial within eight months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the trial court does not conclude the trial 2 within the stipulated period, the petitioner will be at liberty to move for bail. Anilkrsinha (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)