IN THE MADHYA PRADESH ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,BENCH—RAIPUR ". aw :oXQ-37Qf ‘0' F? lama §A/(l $§ F Stats x: m “meme! O.A.NO. of 2001 APPLICANT D.R. Nayak S/o P.R.Nayak age 55 years, Accountant, Office of Divisional Forest Office Kawardha,resident of ‘Ward No.5, Kawardha, Tahsil — 'Kawardha, Distt. Kawardha (C;G.)a VERSUS RESPONDENTS : l. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Forest Tourism and Culture Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur. 2. Conservator of Forest Durg Circle, Durg Divisional Forest Officer >Kawardha Forest Division Kawardha, Tahsil and District - Kawardha (Chhattisgarh). APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 ADMINISTRATIVE ACT, 1985. 51 Eg mm (Wu) WWW Wwm§wm assimarévr S.B.: Hon’ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra 23-4-2010 No one appears for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Payashi Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents. The matter was passed over once 'in absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner. No one appears for the petitioner even in the second call. in the circumstance, there is no other option left with the Court but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. y The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. antKumar M‘sma r / Yras" Judge// r \z L V“ "