Crl. Misc. No. M-15210 of 2011 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-15210 of 2011 Date of Decision : November 23, 2011 Arun Singhal .... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana .... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. N. C. Kinra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar, DAG, Haryana with Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the complainant. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Accused Arun Singhal has filed this petition for anticipatory bail in case FIR No.229 dated 05.04.2011, under Sections 498-A, 406 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station City, District Rohtak. Pursuant to order of the preceding date, petitioner and complainant Nisha are present in person. Efforts for reconciliation made, but failed. The complainant is ready to join the matrimonial home, but the Crl. Misc. No. M-15210 of 2011 2 petitioner wants separation by way of amicable settlement, for which the complainant is not ready. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. The petitioner is husband of the complainant and is therefore the main accused. Notice of motion in this case was issued on the statement that the petitioner is ready to keep his wife with him with full love and affection, and therefore, interim relief was also granted. However, for whatever reason, reconciliation has not been possible between the parties, without blaming either side for the failure of the reconciliation process. Keeping in view the allegations against the petitioner and the fact that he being husband of the complainant, is the main accused in the case, no ground for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is made out. Dismissed, without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case. November 23, 2011 ( L. N. MITTAL ) monika JUDGE