IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.W.P. (T) No. 9612 of 2008. Decided on 8th December, 2010. _____________________________________________________ Bharat Bhushan Sood. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate. For respondents No. 1 and 2. : Mr. R.P. Singh and Mr. J.S. Guleria, Assistant Advocate Generals. For respondent No. 3. : Mr. Surinder Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of the Court to Annexure A- 19, dated December, 2002. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-State to take a consequential action on Annexure A-19, dated December, 2002, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. It is made clear that in case the decision is taken in favour of the petitioner, he shall be entitled to all the consequential benefits. No costs. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 08, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. - 2 - - 3 - `