SSM 1 28.aba.340.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 340 OF 2011 Nanasaheb Dagadu Ingale and others ....Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent _________ Mr. K. S. Patil i/b Mr. Prashant Hagare for the Applicants. Mr. Y. M. Nakhawa, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM: R. C. CHAVAN, J. DATED : 25 TH APRIL, 2011. P.C.: This is an application for Anticipatory Bail by a person who is alleged to have abetted suicide by Mahadeo Choudhari jumping before a train. His wife also committed suicide prior to that incident. On the applicant's Petition, this Court has ordered investigation in the case of death of Mahadeo's wife Alka. Mahadeo's brother Navnath filed a private complaint against applicants alleging that they had abetted suicide by Mahadeo. On this, the learned Magistrate ordered investigation under Section 156 (3) of Code of Criminal Procedure. SSM 2 28.aba.340.11 2. Considering the nature of allegations it is not clear as to why for the purpose of investigation into death of Mahadeo who committed suicide before train custodial interrogation of applicants is necessary. Hence, though the learned APP has strong objection, each of the Applicants' be released in the event of their arrest in C. R. No. 06 of 2011 registered with Kurduwadi Railway Police Stationon bail on furnishing PR Bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with one or more solvent sureties in the aggregate sum of Rs.15,000/- on the following conditions :- i) The applicants shall make themselves available on 2 nd May, 2011 at 11.00 a.m. for interrogation by Investigating Officer and thereafter as and when required Investigating Officer. ii) The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. iii)The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial Court. SSM 3 28.aba.340.11 iv) The order shall remain in force till the trial is over with the only stipulation that if chargesheeted the applicant may furnish fresh bonds before the trial Court in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre -vs- State of Maharashtra and ors, in S.L.P No.7615 of 2009. v) The application stands disposed of accordingly. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)