IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH FRIDAY, THE 17TH OCTOBER 2008 / 25TH ASWINA 1930 W.P(C).No. 35612 of 2007(M) ----------------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- P.N.SUDARSANAN, S/O. NARAYANANKUTTY, SOBHANA BHAVANAM, MELOODU P.O., MELOODU, ADOOR. (PROPRIETOR, SUDARSANA HOTEL, HOLY CROSS JUNCTION, ADOOR). BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA. 3. THE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ADOOR. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADOOR. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADOOR POLICE STATION, ADOOR. 6. PAPPY VARGHESE @ T.P.VARGHESE, S/O. M.G.PAPPY, THADATHIL PUTHENVEEDU, KARUVATTA MURI, PERINGANADU VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. W.P.(C) NO.35612 OF 2007 - 2 - 7. PAPPY GEORGE, S/O. M.G.PAPPY, THADATHIL PUTHENVEEDU, KARUVATTA MURI, PERINGANADU VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. 8. PAPPY BABU, S/O. M.G.PAPPY, THADATHIL PUTHENVEEDU, KARUVATTA MURI, PERINGANADU VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK. R1 TO R5 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL R6 & R7 BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR & SRI.BINDU SREEKUMAR R8 BY ADV. SRI.K.SASIKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.M.JOSEPH, J. ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.35612 of 2007 ------------------------------------------ Dated, this the 17th day of October, 2008 JUDGMENT H.L.Dattu, C.J. Smt.M.P.Mary, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, would inform us that, as of now, respondents 6 to 8 are not creating any troubles either for her or for her property. 2. Taking note of the statement made by the learned counsel, this writ petition is closed for the present. 3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court, if need arises in future. 4. In view of the order passed in the writ petition, the prayer sought for in I.A.No.16122 of 2007 need not be considered by us at this stage. Accordingly the said application is rejected. Ordered accordingly. (H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE (K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE vns