Civil Revision No.5657 of 2010(O&M) #1# IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.5657 of 2010(O&M) Date of Decision:-21.01.2011 Smt. Bhati & Others. ......Petitioners. Versus State Bank of India & Others. ......Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH. Present:- Mr. Jaswant Jain, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S.S. Pathania, Advocate for the respondent no.-SBI. Mr. Manoj Tanwar, Advocate for the Applicant/Auction Purchaser. *** JASWANT SINGH, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.22556-CII of 2010 Allowed as prayed for. C.M. No.28950-CII of 2010 Application under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC for impleading the applicant as one of the contesting respondent in this civil revision. Learned counsel for non applicants have no objection to the same. Civil Revision No.5657 of 2010(O&M) #2# Allowed. Suresh Kumar, Auction Purchaser is permitted to be impleaded as respondent no.6. Registry is directed to make necessary correction in the memo of parties. C.R. No.5657 of 2010 Judgment Debtors/Petitioners have approached this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution praying for setting aside the order dated 28.05.2010 passed by the learned Executing Court whereby proclamation of Sale under Order 21 Rule 26 CPC had been made. During the course of hearing before this court the petitioner was permitted to deposit the decretal amount along with 5% of the purchase money for payment to Auction Purchaser since the auction for sale had been conducted on 27.08.2010. Learned counsel submits that in compliance of the orders passed by this Court, the decretal amount along with 5% amount of the bid of the auction purchaser has been deposited by way of bank drafts before the registry of this court. Learned Counsel for the petitioners further submits that in view of these submissions the decree stands satisfied and the execution proceedings are liable to be dropped. It is further prayed that in view of the fact that decree stands satisfied, the bank be ordered to release the papers of their mortgaged property. Learned Counsel for the decree holder(bank) as well as the Auction purchaser do not refute the submissions of the counsel for the petitioners/judgment debtors. They, however, prayed that the respective Civil Revision No.5657 of 2010(O&M) #3# amounts be ordered to be disbursed to them at the earliest. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and in the circumstances of the case registry is directed to remit the aforesaid amount lying with it to the executing Court concerned forthwith and the Executing Court is further directed to disburse the respective amounts to the respective parties at the earliest and pass necessary orders in accordance with law. Needless to say that the bank would take the required action in accordance with law at the earliest. Disposed of ( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE 21st January, 2011 Vinay