IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1379 OF 2006 IN APPEAL (LDG.) NO.124 OF 2006 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.321 OF 2005 Union of India ....Appellant V/s. M/s.Bright Power Projects (I) Pvt.Ltd. ....Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. Mr.A.M. Vernekar for the Respondent. CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J. VAZIFDAR, JJ. DATED : 21ST JULY, 2006. P.C. : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the Respondent. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bona-fide on the part of the Applicant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)