1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.9067 OF 2010 Gautam s/o Ramchandra Parit ... PETITIONER VERSUS Shashikant s/o Ramchandra Parit & ors. ... RESPONDENTS ..... Shri V.V. Ingale, Advocate for the petitioner ..... CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 4th October, 2010 PER COURT : 1. An interlocutory order rejecting request of the defendant Nos.1 to 3 to permit them to cross-examine the witness of plaintiff is subjected to challenge in this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. It transpires from papers that the claim raised by the plaintiff is not resisted by defendant Nos.1 to 3 by presenting written statement. It appears that, the defendant Nos.1 to 3 are supporting the case of the plaintiff. The trial Court was justified in turning down the request made by defendant Nos.1 to 3 for permitting them to cross-examine witness of plaintiff. There is no resistance put up by the defendants controverting the contentions raised by plaintiff in 2 plaint. In view of interlocutory nature of challenge raised in petition, in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, no interference is called for. Hence, petition stands rejected. R.M. BORDE JUDGE fmp/wp9067.10