IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16877 of 2009 SUNITA DEVI @ PINKU Versus The STATE OF BIHAR ------ 2/ 21.05.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In the case in-laws, including this petitioner have been alleged for demand of dowry causing of cruelty due to its non- fulfillment and ultimately, killing the deceased. In such case, submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that she is wife of the elder brother of the husband, who remained separated after a partition and in corroboration of the same, order of Anchal Adhikari and rent receipt has been filed. In my view also demand from gotni who stand on the footing of the deceased appears doubtful for rejection of the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 439 of 2008, above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa (Nalanda) subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. shail (Mandhata Singh, J.)