-: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.8 OF 2007 M/s.Essen Products (I) Ltd. & Anr. : Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra : Respondent ... Mr.Anil Subramaniam for the petitioners. Mrs.U.V.Kejariwal, Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. ... CORAM : BILAL NAZKI & S.A.BOBDE,JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 06, 2008. P.C. 1. The petitioners want an unusual relief from this Court that this Court should decide in vacuum as to which Court has jurisdiction and which Court has not the jurisdiction to entertain complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, in the light of various judgments of the Supreme Court and of this Court. Such question cannot be decided because, as a matter of fact, facts of every case decide the jurisdiction and every case is different from the other case for the purpose of decision on jurisdiction. Without any facts before this Court, this Court will not be in a position to decide the matters of jurisdiction and direct Magistrates to entertain -: 2 :- complaints presented before them or not to entertain complaints which are not presented before them and of which facts are not known to them. 2. This Public Interest Litigation is misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (S.A. BOBDE, J.)