IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY WRIT PETITION No.23427 of 2003 Between: T.Rama Krishna. … Petitioner And Regional Transport Authority, Srikakulam District, Srikakulam, reptd., by its Secretary and two others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: None. Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Transport for R.1 & R.2. Sri Srinivasa Rao Kalakuri for R.3. This Court made the following: ORDER:- At the hearing there is no representation for the writ petitioner. Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Transport for respondents 1 and 2 and Sri Srinivasa Rao Kalakuri for respondent No.3 and perused the record. This Writ Petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent No.1 in implementing order dated 28-2-2002 passed by respondent No.2 in A.P.No.201/2002, as arbitrary and illegal. In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.1 it is averred that the application of the petitioner for grant o f pucca permit on the modified route, viz., Boddepallipeta to Old Bus Stand, Srikakulam via., Kintali, was rejected by respondent No.1 vide: its order dated 3-1-2004. No reply affidavit is filed controverting the said averments contained in the counter-affidavit. As the petitioner’s grievance that respondent No.1 has not disposed of his application for grant of pucca permit on the modified route as directed by respondent No.2 ceased to exist with the rejection of his application by respondent No.1 on 3-1-2004, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.29415 of 2005 is also dismissed as infructuous. ------------------------------------ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,J 24-6-2008 MNR