IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11713 of 2011 MANTU KUMAR, S/O-ARVIND SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 04 23.06.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner is husband and admittedly, his marriage had taken place in the year 2004 whereas deceased died in the year 2010 i.e. after six years of her marriage. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that deceased had no uterus and she was not able to produce any offspring and being fed up with the above stated fact, she committed suicide. It is also contended by him that deceased was immediately taken to hospital by the petitioner and his other family members and an information regarding the aforesaid incident was given to the informant and his other family members but after the death of the deceased, the informant lodged this false case. In support of his contention, learned counsel for the petitioner drew my attention towards Photostat copy of the post-mortem report and submitted that it has specifically been mentioned in the aforesaid post-mortem report that deceased had no uterus. It is also contended by him that Dy.S.P. in course of supervision has found the aforesaid fact true and that is why the police submitted charge sheet under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. Although, learned counsel appearing for the informant opposed the prayer but considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Pali P.S. Case No. 43 of 2010. Shahzad ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)