In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ...... Criminal Misc. No.M-26015 of 2010 ..... Date of decision:23.9.2010 Kamaljit Singh and others .....Petitioners v. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents .... Present: Mr. R.S. Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioners. ..... S.S. Saron, J. The petition has been filed for quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise. There are other accused in the case who are not impleaded as party. Besides, the offence under Section 307 IPC is not compoundable in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Manoj Sharma v. State and others, 2008 (4) RCR (Cr.) 827 (SC) in which it has been held that there can be no doubt that a case under Section 302 IPC or other serious offences like those under Sections 395, 307 or 304-B IPC cannot be compounded and hence proceedings in these provisions cannot be quashed by the High Court in exercise of its power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or any writ jurisdiction on the basis of compromise. Learned counsel for the petitioners relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Balwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another, 2009 (4) RCR (Cr.) 690 to contend that the offence under Section 307 IPC can be compounded. However, the same would be inapplicable in view of the law laid by the Supreme Court in Manoj Sharma's case (supra) . Accordingly, the criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed. Cr. Misc. No.M-26015 of 2010 [2] September 23, 2010. (S.S. Saron) Judge *hsp*