‘11. Smt‘ Mahetrine, wife of Shri Gudda, resident of Village Jogipur, Tehsi! Kota, District Bilaspur (CG) 12. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Coliector, Bilaspur (CG) (Defendants/respondenfs) Second appeai under Section 100 cf CPC. 1908 Present Shri Somnath Verma, counsel for the appeuants. Shri Bhaskar Payashi, counsei for respondent No.1. Shri PR. Patankar, PL for the State. ORAL ORDER ' (Passed on 18.08.2008) Heard on admission. (2) The appellant is aggrieved by the jLid'gment and decree dated 26.03.20t35 passed in civil appeal No.2-A/2005 by the lst‘Additional District Judge, Bilaspur affirming the judgment and decree dated 30.1 0.2004 passed in civil suit No.9—A/2003 by the lll'd Civil Judge, Class-l, Bilaspur, whereby the respondent/plaintiff’s suit for declaration of title, partition and separate possession was partly decreed. « (3) During the arguments, learned counsei for the appellant Was unable to point out any illegaiity or infirmity in the concurrent finding recorded by both theCourts below. Learned counsel for the appellant also did not show that any substantial question of taw arise/s or determination of this appeal. (4) ln this view of the matter, the appeal being devojdof any merit is dismissed at the stage of admission. l ‘ Sd-/ Judge a " Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Priya ‘ :