Civil Revision No.7328 of 2011(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Revision No.7328 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: November 29, 2011 Amar Singh .....Petitioner v. Bhagwinder Singh and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) C.M.No.28377-CII of 2011 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Civil Revision No.7328 of 2011 The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside order dated 23.9.2011 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ludhiana, in Execution No.12 dated 13.3.1999, Annexure P3, vide which present petitioner-judgment debtor was directed to pay another sum of `24,000/-. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully including the impugned order passed by learned Executing Court. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner- judgment debtor that admittedly suit for recovery of `30,000/- along with future interest @ 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till realisation of the decreetal amount was passed against the present petitioner Civil Revision No.7328 of 2011(O&M) -2- and in favour of respondents, regarding which execution petition is pending before learned Executing Court. It is further contended that admittedly he has already paid `60,000/- to the decree holders. It is further contended that however just on the asking of the respondent-decree holders, learned Executing Court has directed him to pay a sum of `24,000/- more without making any calculation and without passing any speaking order as to how `25,000/- more is to be paid by the present petitioner-judgment debtor. Hence, in view of these facts, the present revision petition is accepted. Impugned order passed by learned Executing Court is set aside. Learned Executing Court is directed to pass a speaking order after hearing both the parties as to how much amount remains to be paid by present petitioner-judgment debtor to respondent-decree holders, after calculating the amount as per the judgment and decree passed in favour of respondent- decree holders. Disposed of accordingly. 29.11.2011 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge