1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.11.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.(MD)No.1746 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1, 2 and 3 of 2011 A.Panneerselvam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Madurai Road,Trichy 621 008. 2.The District Educational Officer, Trichy 621 017. 3.Christian Endeavour Higher Secondary School, Rep.by its Correspondent, Vannarapettai,Puthur,Trichy 621 017. 4.D.James Abraham ... Respondents Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the 2nd show cause impugned Notice dated 03.02.2011 passed by the 4th respondent and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.D.Gnanasekaran For Respondents : Mr.M.Govindan, Spl.G.P. for R1 and R2 Mr.M.Suresh for R3, Mr.R.Sundar for R4 ORDER The Writ petition is filed by the teacher of the 4th respondent school challenging the 2nd show cause notice dated 03.02.2011. By the 2nd show cause notice, it was held by the management that out of 7 charges, charges 1, 4, 5 and 6 have been proved. On the basis of the proved charges, the petitioner was asked to submit his explanation. The petitioner challenging the show cause notice filed this Writ petition. 2.This Court by order dated 15.02.2011 granted an interim stay as the petitioner had challenged the authority of the school management in issuing the impugned show cause notice. The interim stay continues till date. But, however when the matter came up today, Mr.D.Rajendran, learned counsel for the management stated that in the interest of the school and the larger interest of the students and also to have harmony relationship between the teachers and the school management, the school management is agreed to withdraw all the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner A.Paneerselvam covered by W.P.(MD)No.1746 of 2011. The said statement of the school management is recorded and it is hereby declared that the proceedings initiated against the petitioner in this Writ petition will stand withdrawn. The Writ petition is liable to be disposed of accordingly. 3.The hope expressed by this Court as well as by the educational authority as found in the W.P.(MD)Nos.14192 to 14195 of 2010 wherein the petitioner himself is also a party will abide by both the teachers and the management in the larger interest of the student community and also the fundamental duty and right contained in Article 21-A of the Constitution. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 4.The Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected M.Ps.are closed. Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(RTI ACT) /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. nbj To 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Madurai Road, Trichy 621 008. 2.The District Educational Officer, Trichy 621 017. 1CC TO DR.D.GNANASEKARAN, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 41880 1cc To Mr. R.SUNDAR, ADVOCATE IN SR No.41762 1CC To THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI IN SR NO.41844 SB 12/12/2011 2P 6C W.P.(MD)No.1746 of 2011 28.11.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/