IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 30TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 1339 of 2009(S) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.19058/2009 Dated 08/07/2009 .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- SUJITH V., S/O. VELAYUDHAN NAIR, AGED 32, KOCHUTHARAPUTHEN VEEDU, INJAKKAD KARA, KAKKAKUNNU P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.E.S.ASHRAF RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS -------------------------- 1. B.SIVAN PILLAI, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KOLLAM. 2. SRI.RAJENDRAN PILLAI, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, SASTHAMCOTTA PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD.NO.Q. 373, BHARANIKAVU, SASTHAMCOTTA. BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. ANU SIVARAMAN THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. -------------------------------------------------- COC. NO.1339 OF 2009 (S) -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of November, 2009 J U D G M E N T Complaint is regarding the non-compliance of Annexure-A2 judgment in WP(c).No.19058/09. By that judgment the first respondent was directed to deal with Ext.P3, where the petitioner's complaint was that the Society was not taking further action in pursuance to the vacancy notification issued on 25.8.2006 for filling up Class-IV posts in the Society. 2. Government Pleader has obtained instructions in the matter and submits that the Joint Registrar considered the representation of the petitioner as directed and that orders have been issued directing the part time administrator in charge of the Society to take further action in pursuance to the notification and to report compliance there of. 3. Now that order has been issued by the Joint Registrar as above, there is nothing warranting for proceeding against the respondents under the contempt of court Act. Contempt case is closed directing the Society to take further action as directed. COC.No.1339 /09 :2 : Petitioner may produce a copy of this order before the part time administrator of the society for compliance. Needless to say that if the petitioner has any surviving grievance in the matter it will be open to him to approach this court. (ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE vi/