1 1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1758 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1758 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1758 OF 2005 IN IN IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.287 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.287 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.287 OF 2005 Mahesh Balu Jethawa : Applicant. versus The State of Maharashtra : Respondent. Ms.Rohini Dandekar, advocate appointed, for the applicant. Mrs.S.D.Shinde, APP, for the State. CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE S.A.BOBDE, JJ. S.A.BOBDE, JJ. S.A.BOBDE, JJ. DATED : JULY 25, 2006. DATED : JULY 25, 2006. DATED : JULY 25, 2006. P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. This is an application for condonation of delay. The appeal is filed by original accused through jail. Advocate Ms.Rohini Dandekar, is 2 2 2 already appointed by this court to represent the accused. She is present in court. She submits that there is a delay of 258 days in filing the appeal. She further submits that the delay is on account of conviction and non-avilability of finances. The trial court convicted the accused under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him for life. Even the APP does not have serious objection in condoning the delay. Therefore, in the circumstances, the delay is condoned. Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly. Appeal is admitted. Appeal to come up for hearing in due course. 2. Put up the bail application after two weeks which is not on record as on today. [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [D.G.DESHPANDE,J] [S.A.BOBDE, J] [S.A.BOBDE, J] [S.A.BOBDE, J]