IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.37517 of 2009 1.SHRI NARAYAN PRASAD son of late Baudh Prasad 2.Daya Shankar Prasad son of Shri Narayan Prasad 3.Pratima Devi wife of Sri Narayan Prasad 4.Meena Devi wife of Harishankar Prasad, All resident of village-Parsauni, P.S.-Chakia, Dist. East Champaran. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 2.2.2010. Heard Mr.Yogesh Chandra Verma, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Chakiya P.S. Case No.67 of 2009 registered for the offence under sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that during investigation the police has found the case to be true only against the husband of the deceased namely, Gauri Shankar Prasad and Daya Shankar Prasad, petitioner no.2, in the present case. So far as petitioner nos.1, 3 and 4 are concerned till date the police has found nothing against them. It appears that during investigation, step daughter of the deceased has disclosed that after telephonic discussion with her deceased mother and father (Gauri Shankar Prasad), who had telephoned from Delhi, her mother became very disturbed and after some time her step mother and her baby aged about 1 ½ years were found dead. Keeping in view the fact that after investigation the police has found case true under sections 306 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code only against the husband i.e. Gauri Shankar 2 Prasad and petitioner no.2, Daya Shankar Prasad, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner nos.1, 3 and 4, namely, Shri Narayan Prasad, Pratima Devi and Meena Devi. Accordingly, the petitioner nos.1, 3 and 4, namely, Shri Narayan Prasad, Pratima Devi and Meena Devi., in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Chakiya P.S.Case No.67 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. So far as prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of petitioner no.2, namely, Daya Shankar Prasad, is concerned, I am not inclined to extend privilege of anticipatory bail to him. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected. Md.S. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)