IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1080 of 2009 1. Rajendra Thakur s/o Ram Chandra Thakur, r/o village – Kusmari, P.S. – Riga, District – Sitamarhi 2. Ram Suresh Thakur s/o Ram Dayal Thakur, r/o village Mohini Mandal, P.S. Mohini Mandal, Sitamarhi 3. Raj Kisho Pd. Singh, s/o Ram Bahadur Singh, r/o village Sirahi, Sitamarhi 4. Sunil Kumar s/o Raj Kumar Singh, r/o village – Alipur, Sitamarhi 5. Manoj Kumar s/I Raj Nandan Sah, r/o village Alipur, Sitamarhi 6. Fuzail Ahmad s/o Md. Manirudeen, r/o village – Kansar, Sitamarhi 7. Birendra Kumar Jha s/o Adbhud Nath Jha, r/o village – Dumri Kala, Sitamarhi 8. Satya Narayan Mahto s/o Mahanth Mahto, r/o village – Purandaha Rajbara, Sitamarhi 9. Vijay Kumar s/o Hanslal Yadav, r/o village Buniadi Tola, Sitamarhi 10. Binod kumar s/o Ram Sevak Bhagat, r/o village lachhua, Sitamarhi 11. Shailendra Kumar Mishra @ Shailendra Mishra, s/o Bindeshwar Pd. Mishra, r/o village – Marpakacha, Sitamarhi 12. Abadh Kishor Singh, s/o Bindeshwari Singh, r/o village – Barahi, Sitamarhi 13. Shankar Sah s/o Jhagru Sah, r/o village – Mohini Mandle, Sitamarhi 14. Hriday Narayan Prasad, s/o Brahmdeo Sah, r/o village – Pachtaki Yadu, Sitamarhi 15. Jagarnath Prasad Sah s/o Budhan Mahto, r/o village Panaura, Sitamarhi 16. Ashok Prasad s/o Ramdeo Prasad, r/o village – Mejarganj, Sitamarhi 17. Amar Kant Jha, s/o Brahmdeo Jha, r/o village Bhitha Best, Sitamarhi …….. Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2 4. The secretary, Rural Development Department, Bihar, Patna 5. The Director, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 6. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi 7. The Divisional Deputy Director, Panchayati Raj, Muzaffarpur Division, Muzaffarpur 8. Panchayati Raj Officer, Sitamarhi …….Contemnors ----------- 3 18.5.2010 Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. Vibhakar Tiwari, learned counsel for the State, fairly stated that the controversy involved in the matter is covered by the decision rendered in MJC. No.1081 of 2009. In view of concession given, the present MJC is disposed of in terms of the order passed on 20th April, 2010 in MJC. No.1081 of 2009. There shall be no order as to costs. Neyaz/ ( Dipak Misra, CJ.) (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)