1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.95 OF 2009 IN SUIT NO.2875 OF 2004 Ajay Sohanlal Jhuria .....Plaintiff versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..... Defendants And Mr.Chimanlal Ujamshi shah & Ors. ..... Respondents ---- Mr.Kirit Mody i/by Bhaishankar Kanga & Girdharlal for the plaintiff. Mr.Chetan Kapadia i/by Kishore Thakardas & Co. for defendant no.11 and respondents to Chamber summons. ---- CORAM: S.J.KATHAWALLA,J DATE: 15th SEPTEMBER, 2011 P.C. 1. Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. 2. The present Chamber summons is allowed only to the extent of allowing the plaintiff to amend the plaint and bring on record the respondents as defendant nos.11(a), 11(b) and 11(c) to the plaint along with consequential amendments. All contentions of the defendants including that of limitation is kept open. The plaintiff shall be at liberty to take out fresh Chamber summons seeking 2 further amendment if so advised. If any such fresh chamber summons is taken out, the same shall be decided on its own merits. 3. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. Copy of the amended plaint shall be forthwith served on newly added defendants. (S.J.KATHAWALLA,J)