IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO THOUSAND TEN PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.26925 of 2008, 9516 & 16799 of 2009 WP.No.26925 of 2008 Between: B. Venkatesh Babu … Petitioner And Hindusthan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Mumbai & others. … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Patti Srinivasulu (in WP.No.26925 of 2008) Counsel for the petitioner : Sri K.Bheema Rao (in WP.No.9516 of 2009) Counsel for the petitioner : Sri M. Jayaram Reddy (in WP.No.16799 of 2009) Counsel for the respondents: Sri M. Ravindranath Reddy SC for HPCL Counsel for respondent No.4: Sri M. Jayaram Reddy (in WP.No.9516 of 2009) This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.26925 of 2008, 9516 & 16799 of 2009 COMMON ORDER:- These three writ petitions are filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents in finalizing the selections held for appointment of LPG distributor for Amarapuram Village and Mandal, Anantapur District, as illegal and arbitrary. At the hearing, it is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the selections were finalized in which the petitioner in Writ Petition No.9516 of 2009 was selected and that questioning the same Writ Petition No.26486 of 2009 has been filed by the aggrieved parties. The learned counsel submitted that in view of the same, the cause in these three writ petitions has ceased to survive. Placing on record the above submission of the learned counsel, these three writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petitions as infructuous, WPMP.No.35274 of 2008 in WP.No.26925 of 2008, WPMP.No.12411 of 2009 in WP.No.9516 of 2009 and WPMP.No.16799 of 2009 in WP.No.22044 of 2009 are also dismissed as infructuous. _____________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Date: 04.03.2010 ES