*~h-,:» 9SSWS »»is L?£.^A^^ iS IN THR HTRH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHArTKGARH AT BILASPUE. V/.P.NO, 5~3 ; / 2006 Petitioner <5^s.$s> ^^t^"" _.. *'"".. ^vjS'-ylr\' ^^ "a.'s»- ""^""^b t?.^-^-1"'"' Versus Respondents 1. Chhabi Lal Thakur S/o Late Govind Ram Tbakur, Aged about 36 years, R/o New Ganj Mandi Road, Pandri Tarai Near Verma Rirana Store, Raipur, presently residing at Civil Line Behind Naveen Shala, Baloda Bazar, Dist: Raipur-(C.G-). State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Forest Department, Mantralaya Raipur, Dist: Raipur-fC.G.) The Sub Divisional Porest Officer, Raipur Forest Division,Raipur-(C.G.) The Range Officer, Divisional Forest Office (General) Raipur, Dist : Raipur-fC.G.) State of Madhya Pradesh Through the Secretary Forest Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, Dist : Bhopal-(M.P.) Union of India, Through the Chief Secretary Department of Personal 8s Training & Public Grievances, Shastri Marg, New Delhi %!'• WRIT PETITION U/A 226 / 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC-22 "rg -4|t(ld*<, •ti'dl'yli(».^cll'ay sn^r'^1 . R-)i* sf^v *4i+'Hftg .,-ha^. 17 an^r •g^gigt'gftd atn petttioner Stfcte em't»loyef Petitioner by Shri Deepak J; Shri S.P. Kale, Govt. Adv. fpi|. Shri.S.K. Beriwal, Staadifls Wiftt consent, heaixl finally. This case relates to compas^ deafh.ofan einployee serving in th4 Learaed counsel for fhe of tbe einployee has occurred on earlier. It is further subnutfed No.1322/2002. iavolviag fhe same| Court on 20/12/2005. He prays case also. Learued counsel for fhe states fhat the State of Ghhattisj cases .of dependaats of those strictly ia accordance witU fhe pjalicy subiniits thaf four inonths ttme for [n view 6f fhe subinissions parties, without expressing aiiy,.i opinion of this Court, ends ofjus^ice fhe State of Chhattisgarh and decide the case of ttie peUtioner i(i the time of deafh of fhe einployee appoiatinent orders will be issue4 inonttts froin fhe date of petitioner is also directed to rcndej inade clear ftiat if any grievance reiaedv available uuder. the law Court. . . Wifh. the .aforesaid Certified copy as perrules., Copy to fhe State counsel, order to tlie respondeuts for coinp^iaiice |ionate appointtnent consequent upon the 'State. : .. .^ " ' . catGgorically stafedfh.at, the deafh {-11.--1999 i.e.after l-11tl997andnot 1 fhat in batch of cases hearing W.P. question. orders Iiave been passed by this |tTiat similar orders m.ay be passed in fhis <^l'4i<v1'4l^ Hl+<<^f ^ T^^ -•(,^1'^K • ^? sifsgq snt^ Advdcate. .theState. Couiisel for Union 6f India. does not dispute flie above fact aiid iferh has taken a decision to consider fhe ;es wlio died onorafter 1/11/1997 prevalent at tfiat tune. He however (tssuiag heccssaiy orders ina.y be given. i^iade by leamed counsel appearing for the c^paiion on ihe inerits of fhe case, ia fhe will be seived ifa direction is giyen to auttiorities concemed to co&sider and accordance with fhe:policy prevalent at Eoacenied. If the petitioner fouiid eligible, as early as possible preferably wiftiin-4 :,of a eopy of this order. The }~ due c.0-0peration to fhe aufhorities. It is itill reuiauis, fhe petidoaer inay avail the ijicludiag fiUng of the petition before fhis islice Ule Itl producljion/ receipt, observati<)ius, ttiis peti'tion-stands disposed of. who wUl be obliged to coiniatuiicate thi Sdf- Fakhruddin Judge fTft»y<a'-i ^;