IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.C.HARI RANI MONDAY, THE 7TH JUNE 2010 / 17TH JYAISTHA 1932 Mat.Appeal.No. 184 of 2009() ---------------------------- OP.81/2005 of FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR .................... PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ------------------------- BABU, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. NARAYANAN, ALIKKAPRAMABU, P.O. VARADOOR, WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR SRI.P.C.GOPINATH RESPONDENT(S): COUNTER APPELLANT -------------------------------- SMT. JAYA, AGED 24 YEARS, D/O. R. MARY @ UNNIKRISHNAN, MANAKKAL MATTATHIL VEEDU, NELLUVAYI.P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. * * * * * * * * * * * * * C.M.Application No.578 of 2009 & Mat.Appeal No.184 of 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of June 2010 O R D E R & J U D G M E N T Basant,J There is no submission that conditions have been complied with. No voucher/receipt is produced also. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has not received any instructions as to whether the payment has been made or not. We must take it that the payment has not been made. Conditions have not been complied with. We are satisfied, in these circumstances, that the application for condonation of delay of 612 days only deserves to be dismissed. 2. This C.M.Application is accordingly dismissed. Consequently, the Mat.Appeal shall stand rejected as barred by limitation. (R.BASANT, JUDGE) (M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE) jsr // True Copy// PA to Judge W.P.(Crl)/M.A/W.P.C.No. : 2 : W.P.(Crl)/M.A/W.P.C.No. : 3 : W.P.(Crl)/M.A/W.P.C.No. : 4 : R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ. .No. of 200 ORDER/JUDGMENT 29/07/2009