: 1 : USJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.436 OF 2010 Dr. Ashok M. Bhat & Anr. .. Plaintiffs v/s. Hari Om Agarwal .. Defendant ......... Mr. Vinod Bhagat with Dhiren R. Karania for the plaintiffs Defendant in person. ......... CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 8TH APRIL, 2010. P.C. : 1. Defendant has produced card issued by Election Commission of India to show his identity. Perused the card. He should file on record xerox copy of the said card by 2.00 p.m. Consent terms dated today i.e. 8th April, 2010 are signed by plaintiff no.1 for himself and constituted attorney of plaintiff no.2, defendant and advocate for plaintiffs. Consent terms are shown to plaintiff no.1 and defendant. Both of them admit their respective signatures and correctness thereof. Learned advocates for the plaintiffs and defendant pray for decree in terms of consent terms. : 2 : 2. Consent terms as above are taken on record. They are marked as “X” for identification. There shall be a decree in terms of consent terms. Undertakings given in the consent terms by the defendant are accepted. 3. Notice of Motion No.542 of 2010 is allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs. Xerox copy of election card is filed by the defendant. [R.Y.GANOO, J.]