IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.19669 of 2010 DARA SINGH @ ARJUN SINGH, S/O CHHEDI SINGH & TRIVENI SINGH, R/O VILLAGE BHUPAULI, P.S. UDWANT NAGAR, DISTRICT BHOJPUR, ARA .. PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR .. OPPOSITE PARTY **** /3/ 30.06.2010 Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. 2. This application is for anticipatory bail for offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The petitioner was seen fleeing away from the place of occurrence with two criminals in a Suzuki Maruti car, out of which one person arrested and other managed to escape and the car was apprehended on suspicion and the accused, who was caught, disclosed the name of the petitioner amongst his associates. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested with the car and it is not disclosed that the car is a theft car. The anticipatory bail petition of petitioner has been rejected by the Session's Judge taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is also an accused under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code in Agiaon (Bazar) P.S. Case No. 7 2 of 2010 and the case is still under investigation. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. 5. However, if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail, that will be considered on it’s own merit without being prejudiced of this order. S.A. ( Gopal Prasad, J. )