1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI.APPLICATION NO. 2473 OF 2009 Shri Hanmant Krishna More, .. Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. P.B.Shah, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. K.V.Saste, APP, for the Respondent. Mr V.V.Purvant, for the original complainant. CORAM : D.B.BHOSALE, J. DATE : 09/06/2009 PC: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.14 of 2009 of Umraj police station, District-Satara. The said crime has been registered against the applicant for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 3(1)(x) of the Attrocities Act and section 7(1)d of the Protection of Civil Rights Act and also under sections 323, 504 of IPC. 3. I have perused the FIR dated 11.5.09 and the written complaint of the complainant dated 9.5.2009. In my opinion, the FIR dated 11.5.2009 and the written complaint dated 9.5.2009 are consistent insofar as the allegations against the applicant T 2 attracting the provisions of the Attrocities Act and the Protection of Civil Rights Act are concerned. Prima facie, the case attracting the provisions of these Acts is made out. Hence, the application is rejected. It is open to the applicant to surrender and apply for regular bail. In that event, the court below shall consider the application of the applicant for regular bail on merits in accordance with law and uinfluenced by the observations made in this order. The application is disposed of. (D.B.BHOSALE, J.)