IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 589 of 2008 (M/S) Bhim Singh Panwar S/o Shri Deshraj R/o Mohalla Gadariyan Kasba Jhabrera Pargana Manglaur, Tehsil Roorkee District Haridwar. . Petitioner ...………… [ Versus 1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary Sugar and Sugarcane Development, Secretariat Complex, Dehradun. 2. Sugarcane and Sugar Commissioner, Uttarakhand, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. District Udham Singh Nagar. 3. Secretary, Cane Development Council, Iqbalpur, District Haridwar. ...…………. Respondents Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr. N.S. Negi, Advocate for respondent No. 3. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2) By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 31st January 2008, passed by Cane and Sugar Commissioner, Uttarakhand, whereby the petitioner has been dismissed from the post of Chairman, Cane Development Council, Iqbalpur, District Haridwar. 2 3) The perusal of the papers on record show that impugned order has been passed by respondent No. 2 after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in compliance of order dated 08.10.1998, passed by Allahabad High Court in Writ Petition No. 3903 (M/B) of 1991. The allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature which are found to have substance. The petitioner has been given due opportunity of hearing before impugned order is passed. 4) Having gone through the impugned order and after considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, this Court does not find any error of law committed by respondent No. 2 in passing the impugned order dated 31.01.2008. 5) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in limine. (Stay Application No. 1664 of 2008 also stands dismissed). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) [ Dt. April 07, 2008. H.Negi