BEJ ^ c^ i^^_ Cp INTHEHON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.tSI N0. ^ 2-^g /2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS .y .•' <fp) ^••^- ^M^ °^:^<^ ^-•y ^"^•"" ^- ^ Sylvanus Xaxa , S/o Late Shri Barnabus Xaxa/ aged about 67 years, (Retired Headmaster) R/o. Village/post-Dokra, Tashil & Block- Kansabel, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through :- The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) 3. Block Education Officer, Block -Kansabel Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) 4. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account & Pension Jashpur, Distt.-Jashpur (C.G.) WMT PETITION UNDBR ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 3TT^r^T f^iict? 37lt?T 5t)^ii<^ ^^ =r W^ ^\^W^, ^Tit^^Ko, f^^ll^y .^^S^M-.&.^j, [cj^^lT' -b ^1*1011 ^b^ic^ 371^T'^H^IT ^ritn S.B: JUSTICEMR.PRI^ 25-11-2010: Shri Somkant Verma, cou?|ise! for the petltioner. Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. ^dvocate for the State. Grisvance of the petitloti though he is entitied to get the ^ Rules, on the of variol Governrnent, tli! date same has ?1 Contention -of the coun^ representation (Annexure P/7) 10.2.2010 is already'pendlng and ends of justics wouid be se to wjthdrawn the petitii No.2 to decide the pending repr^sentation. counsel has no o9 <=hi^f<n<j1i 'HFT^ff ^ fe^ <P»i<^i< '^3Tp<R^T^T |er In the petltlon is that ienefit of Rule 22-D of Fundamenta! js clrcuiars by the sot granted. se! for the petitloner is that hls ^ved if at this the is ^n with a directlon to the.respondent jectlon If the representation of the petjtloner Is declded strictly in ac|sordance with law. jn viey^ ofthe above,the ^resent is ofwith a djrection to the respondent | No. 2 to the of the petitloner a^ as it is c!ear that thls C^ourt has not any opinion on merlts ofthe and the authority concerned wouid be at iiberty to the in a|xordance with la*A'. Sd/- pritinker^*" Judge /^ [Tt^ •••rr^"