\ a Hum awwa mizrmmtr magi, Hagn?! frc’ aTfaaST gufa C¢3‘7~» /95 urfaairasaf— nrfrzafr "Fmwg ..—..._ giggif‘ oqo 5mm trrfaar $favfa 3;@a 226 qrrrfrq gmq We - wfwrrxiaf a'Fr ” W'W%R'fr RITEmi aT§ET1§ m‘g‘r §° $1 'zrzriogo in 2. jgwraff fr Wafw 31$ qogomma g‘rtr HLFHEGIa amh am? ne mi aadwf‘fmpi m‘crm :qog'o M Mfraim $‘v‘gfr2f‘gm mm Hug l.¥ aw ngno n im Fgra gg n f w gé o ks’ “HIGH QQyRT O..E.,J.QQICA.,LQE§$T BILASPUR : CHHATIISGARH SINGLE BENCH : HON’BLE SHRI SR. NAYAK, C.J‘ v "VjLBJT EEHTJON &O;§37 OF 119i W W W warm Haméw 3mm Present : None for the petitioner. (ORAL ORDER) (Passed on 07‘“ November, 2006) When the matter was called out for hearing, none appeared not any representation was made on behalf of the petitioner. ln the circumstance, the petition is dismissed for nomprosecution. No oosts. Sdl- Chief Justice l 62“,.]