IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42808 of 2011 Satwan Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 14.12.2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The present modification application has been filed for modifying the order dated 30.11.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40302 of 2011 since in the last portion of the order it has wrongly been mentioned “to the satisfaction of the learned C. J. M. Samastipur” in instead of “to the satisfaction of the learned Khagaria”. The said mistake perpetuated in the order since it was wrongly been mentioned in the prayer portion of the main petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of main petition. Let the order dated 30.11.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40302 of 2011 be read “to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Khagaria” instead of “to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Samastipur”. 2 The order dated 30.11.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40302 of 2011 stands modified to the extent as indicated above. Let the order be communicated through fax to the learned C.J.M., Khagaria in connection with Maheshkhut P.S. Case No. 92 of 2011 at the cost of the petitioner. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)