1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.16973 of 2010 BIPIN KUMAR JHA SON OF SRI KASHI NATH JHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE & P.O. SISWAR, P.S. BHULPARAS, DISTRICT MADHUBANI----PETITIONER Versus 1.INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. (MARKETING DIVISION) THROUGH ITS SENIOR AREA MANAGER, SHAHI BHAWAN, 1ST FLOOR, EXHIBITION ROAD, PATNA 800001 2.SENIOR AREA MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. (MARKETING DIVISION), SHAHI BHAWAN, 1ST FLOOR, EXHIBITION ROAD, PATNA 800001 3.THE AREA MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. (MARKETING DIVISION), INDANE REGIONAL OFFICE, BEGUSARAI- 851 114 ----RESPONDENTS ----------- For the petitioner :M/S Arvind Kumar Suraj Nr.Yadav, Advocates For the I.O.C. :M/S Anil Kr.Sinha,Amlesh Kr.Verma, Advocates ------ 2. 06.10.2010 The petitioner, who was an applicant for Rajiv Gandhi Gramin LPG Vitrak(RGGLV) Scheme at Phulparas in Madhubani district under open category under an advertisement dated 17.10.2009, is aggrieved by rejection of his candidature by letter dated 8.4.2010 stating that he does not have land at advertised location nor is a resident of the advertised location. It is evident from a consideration of the letter dated 8.4.2010(Annexure-6) that the petitioner was clearly informed that he can submit a representation on the said findings by 29.4.2010 and no representation will be entertained after the said date. It is admitted that no such 2 representation has been filed by the petitioner pursuant to the said letter. In the above circumstances, it is not open to the petitioner to come to this Court after the selection process has been completed without having first made his representation in terms of the guidelines of the RGGLV Scheme which was duly informed to him by the impugned letter. In view of the aforesaid, this Court does not find any merit in the application. It is, accordingly, dismissed. (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.) spal