IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1768 of 2008 OF MOTION NO.1768 of 2008 OF MOTION NO.1768 of 2008 in in in INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1189 of 2008 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1189 of 2008 TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1189 of 2008 in in in INCOME INCOME INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. TAX APPEAL NO. TAX APPEAL NO. OF OF OF 2008 2008 2008 The Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) .. Appellant Vs. M/s Mskinsey Pacific Rim, Inc. Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant None for Respondent CORAM CORAM CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan and A.V.Nirgude, A.V.Nirgude, A.V.Nirgude, JJ JJ JJ DATED DATED DATED : 11th June, 2008 : 11th June, 2008 : 11th June, 2008 P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By this notice of motion, the appellant is seeking condonation of 561 delay caused in filing the appeal. 2. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of motion. It appears that though the last date for filing the appeal was 7.10.06 the appeal was lodged almost after 1 year i.e. on 22.4.08. The delay so cause in filing the appeal is stated to be due to getting the memo of appeal drafted and there was a restructuring of the Directorate of International Taxation, Mumbai. We are not at all satisfied with the reasons given for condonatiion of delay. No sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice of motion 2 stands dismissed. 3. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1189 of 2008 also stands dismissed. {A.V.Nirgude, {A.V.Nirgude, {A.V.Nirgude, J) J) J) (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J) J) J)