IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.19020 of 2010 Date of Decision : October 27, 2010. Karam Chand Gupta .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. Present : Mr.Naresh Prabhakar, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.- 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks a mandamus to direct the respondents to remove the alleged encroachment(s) from the public street shown in the site plan (Annexure P-8). The encroachments are alleged to have been made by respondent Nos.4 & 5 with the help and assistance of respondent No.6. It is alleged that the petitioner has made several complainants to the Municipal Council, Mandi Gobindgarh, followed by a legal notice dated 18.8.2010 (Annexure P-12) but no action has been taken thereupon so far. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the nature of relief sought in this writ petition, however, without expressing any views on the allegations, especially when C.W.P.No .19020 of 2010 2 respondent Nos.4 to 6 have not been heard at this stage, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Fatehgarh Sahib and the Executive officer of the Municipal Council, Mandi Gobindgarh to dispose of the petitioner's complaint/legal notice in accordance with law/Building Bye-laws and after following the prescribed procedure within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Dasti. October 27, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE