::^^. ^ ^ p. ^ v IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH W.P.S^~S72002 ^ WRIT PETITINUNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PETITIONER RESPONDENTS 1. Ghanshyam Das Panjwani Gulab Das Panjwani, aged40years R/o. Mahasati Ward, P.O.Bhatapara, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) VERSUS ;The Municipal Council Bhatapara ^.•^'ys^ %^ v^ .^•^^ <7««<i ^^^•^Through the Chief Municipal officer ^i^TO-^ Bhatapara, Raipur. <3.1" 2. The President, Municipal Council Bhatapara, Raipur /^3. The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Raipur 4. Raju Tiwari, S/o. Shri LalitTiwari Aged 40 years, R/o. Kumharpara Bhatapara Dist. Raipur. 5. Sunder Lal, S/o.Goma Mal , R/o. Mahasati Ward Bhatapara, Raipur. tfusa^ XI-HC-78 ^n^TcRifN^ cWW^STsh^ich '^. ^ *11*1dl ff»*11<ft 3^ ^l^ld4, ^>Tnyli<o, (ci^i'yy . /^^w- ^v/^^^ ^200 STT^rq^p^ 5^<TTW ^cT 3^ST 26/9/2006 Shri Ratan Pusty. !eamed <|ounse! for the Shri Saniay K. Agrawal. lesjr Shri Arun Sao iearned G.AI None for respondents No. Argumentsheard. Order dictated as follows:- ORAL ORDER: By this wit petitjon fited India, the petitioner has pray^ respondent's Cound! toailoton^ date after recejving allotment charfaes The submission of the learfied petitioner was a vegetable ven|der vegetable market at Bhatapars Bhatepara. The petitioner has be^ no aliotment has been made to th^ Learned counsel for the is ready to pay a!i usual charges madetohim. cbl^Td^^ HT^ff ^f teccft <r3i<:<;« ^31^T3TI^T petitioner. •ned counsel for respondents No. 1 & 2. for the State/respondent No. 3. &5. unper Articie 226/227 ofthe Constitution of ^d for issuance of direction to the platform (pakka chabutara/1 at an eariy counsej for the petitioner Is that the who was regulariy sitting in the commonly known as Hatri Bazar, ^n removed since long back but tiEI date petitioner. pefftioner submits that though the petjtloner for atlotment. but no allotment has been a»<s»M-<sS»S;»=^£^as.,L^^ , XI-HC-78 +<1*101< ffi+lich 2 (</S: 3^ ^^lcrt^, ^T(1^1l<o, t®t<rtwy __,__ v^^^ ^yj-/^°_^ ^200 ^T 4^cb W^T cRT I^TW ^l 3')H1cb .\..-r ^<TTW ^cf^n^r —^_- Lsarned counse! for the disposed of with a tiberty to the the concerned authority of the authority ,of the Munjcipai Counstil representetion in an ob|ective by this Court with an objective vie^ the petitioner. iookjng to hls by the learned counsel for the counse! for the Munidpa! Council. The sameis allowed. The petitlon is disposed of| actvised. the petitloner may fi!e concerned authority of the Muni| weeks from today along with a order passed by this Court and ^ concerned authQrity shal! dtspose | as possibte preferably witht?|i receipt of the representation. With the aforesaid obsenf disposedof. peljtioner submits that this petition may be pjetJtioner to fiie a representation before Munidpal Cound! and the concerned Sounstil may be directed to dispose of his mahner within a stipulated period granted to allot a piatform (pakka chabutara) to poverfy and status. This IJmlted prayer made p^tltioner is not opposed by the tearned cofty <=bi^f<n41Ti ^Tm^rf ^*fe^ <Ri<^.i< ^3ri^T3TT^T |at this stage with a djrection that if so |a detaiied representation before the ^ipa! Cound! within a period of three of thls writ petltion and a copy of this tn such representatlon being filed. the |of the same sn an objective manner as ^ a period of one month from the date of fation this writ petition finaliy stends XI-HC-78 *n*r<ti sh+iicb > ^c 3^'^<|*<|<<1<<, «>T(1y<i<o, (si<ni'y^< , }/]/A^^.^^£/^^^ '^ 200 ^T<ra^ 3TT^T^)T^i<=t) ^T3TI^T$h^i4) \A. Kvr ^ cs ^<n'W ^cf 3TT^T -5-1 Consequently. M.W.P.No.2|59/2003 for grant of interim relief stands disposedof. In view of the above, I.A.^94/2003 record, I.A. No. 10426/2003 &I.AI !.A. Np. 8398/2006for out ofturn C.C. as perrules. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge for taking the correct map on No. 1387/2004 for urgent hearing ancf }|iearing also stand disposed of. chl^Icrt41Tl ^l^^T^:te1c^t<i^<:<-l< ^3:rf^H3TT^T P.T.O.