IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.10715 of 2011 1. Sikendar Yadav. 2. Abhinash Yadav Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 8.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the present case has been lodged by the informant on account of land dispute and as a matter of fact, no such occurrence, as alleged in the first information report, did ever take place. It is further contented by him that except Section 379 of the I.P.C and provisions of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, all the sections are bailable in nature whereas the petitioners are languishing in jail custody since 9.2.2011. Taking into consideration the above stated facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10, 000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Begusarai S.C/S.T Police Station Case No. 12 of 2011. Prakash ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)