IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.33618 of 2009 ANIL KUMAR JAISWAL @ ANIL JAISWAL Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----- 3 28.10.2009 Heard Mr. Bhola Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner. It has been pointed out that the bail had been granted to the petitioner vide order dated 09.10.2009. However, in the prayer portion case number has been wrongly stated as S.T. No. 35/02 in place of Sessions Trial No. 38 of 2002. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws the attention of this Court towards paragraph 1 of this application, wherein correct Sessions Trial has been given. It is also stated in the impugned order dated 26.08.2009, passed by the ADJ, FTC I, Katihar, refusing bail to the petitioner also Sessions Trial number has been clearly stated as S.T. No. 38 of 2002. In view of the above, let the order dated 09.10.2009 be deemed to have been passed with respect to Sessions Trial No. 38 of 2002 arising out of Katihar (Town) P.S. Case No. 181/1998 in place of Sessions Trial No. 35 of 2002. - 2 - This order may be communicated to the court concerned through fax, if the petitioner deposits the requisite amount for the same. SC (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)