IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. no. M-24358 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on : 16-09-2011 Anju Nandal and another ....Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr.Gautam Diwan, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Sandeep Mann, Sr. DAG, Haryana Mr. R.S.Budhwar, Advocate for respondents no. 4, 5 and 7 to 14 MAHESH GROVER, J Learned counsel for respondents no. 4, 5 and 7 to 14 states that there is absolutely no objection to the marriage that has been performed by the petitioners and there is no threat to their life. In view of the categoric statement given by learned counsel for respondents no. 4, 5 and 7 to 14, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous for the reason that this was the sole grievance expressed by the petitioners. Hence, the instant petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. In case, the petitioners at any stage feel that there is threat to their lives, they are at liberty to approach respondent no.2 to look into their grievance. September 16, 2011 (Mahesh Grover) rekha Judge