IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CRM-M-16921 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION: 24.09.2009 **** Sunil Kumar and another . . . . Petitioners VS. State UT of Chandigarh . . . . Respondent **** CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN **** Present: Mr.Uma Bharti, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.P.K. Khanduria, Advocate for UT Chandigarh. None for the complainant. **** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that FIR, in which petitioner has applied for anticipatory bail, has been quashed. Therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous. (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) SEPTEMBER 24, 2009 JUDGE vivek