c' Indu tit HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH AT BSLASPUR WriLPeSitionJSlMo^TSlfiUfiOZ Het Ram Rathiya Aged about 49 Years, S/o. Shri Karam Singh Rathiya, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle Schoo! Jobi, Block Kharsia.Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Distt- Raipur (C.G.) The Director Pubiic Instruction Department Raipur (C.G.) District Education OfRcer Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) Block Education Officer Kharsia. District - Raigarh(C.G.) Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare DepartmentRaigarhDistt. Raigarh (C.G.) (Writ Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Hon'ble Justice Satish K. Aanthotri 1 2. 2. 3. 4. Present Shri Ani! Mourya, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Yashwant Sihgh Thakur, Govt. Advocate for tha ORDER (Passed on 2"fl Juty, 2007) The questlon 6f law involved is as to whether the petitioner is entitied to regular pay seale w.e.f. the date of initia! appointment orfrom the date ofcompietion ofprobation period. 2. Learned counsei appearing for She petitiQner as well as forthe respondents/State jointly submit that the facte and question of iaw invplved in the presentwrit petition are the same to that of in W.P. (S) N0.5976Q006 (Sushi! Tiwari and others Vs. SSate Government of Chhattisgarh and others), whlch was aliowed vide order dated 3. in view of the above-stated submissions made by leamed counsel appearing for the parties,the writ petition is allowed in the same Serms subject to verification ofthe facts. No order as to costs. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotn Judge