IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal Bail Application No.588 of 2008 Order on the Bail application of accused. CRIMINAL SIDE 1. Pushkar Singh S/o Pooran Singh 2. Pooran Singh S/o Kitra Singh Both R/o Vill.Bajuara, Patwari Kshetra Nainoli, Tehsil Gangolihat, District Pithoragarh (Uttarakhand) …..Applicants (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ….Opposite party ________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No.01 of 2008. U/Ss 325/307 IPC, Patwari Kshetra Nainoli, Tehsil Gangolihat, Distt. Pithoragarh Dated: October 1, 2008 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard. Smt. Pushpa Joshi, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri. M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State. In brief the prosecution case is that on 26.04.2008, complainant’s son Sunil Kumar did not reach house in the evening. When, the complainant Bhupal Singh Bohra searched for his son, then in the night of 27.4.2008 at about 9:00 P.M., complainant’s son Sunil was found in a ravine. When the victim Sunil came into senses, then he informed that about 7:00 P.M. on that day evening, applicants/accused Puran Singh, Pushkar and Shanti Devi had caused injuries with Lathis. With the same averments, Bhupal Singh Bohra, father of victim Sunil, lodged the FIR on 28.4.2008 at 5:00 A.M. at Patwari Circle Nainoli, Tehsil Gangolihat, Distt. Pithoragarh. Learend counsel for the applicants submitted that the injuries found on the person of injured Sunil Kumar are simple in nature and there is no injury which is grievous or dangerous to the life of the injured Sunil. She further submitted that the FIR was lodged on the hearsay version and no specific role has been assigned to any of the applicants. After considering all the facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicants deserve bail at this stage. Let applicants Pushkar Singh and Pooran Singh be released on bail on each of their executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Pithoragarh. The bail application is disposed of accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 01.10.2008 Rajeev Dang