IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No. M-36745 of 2010 Date of Decision: 10.01.2011. Manpreet Singh .......Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh. 1. Whether the reporters of local news papers may be allowed to see judgment? 2. To be referred to reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: Mr. S.P.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, AAG, Punjab for the State. ..... Alok Singh, J. (Oral). This is the petition seeking regular bail in FIR No. 75 dated 10.8.2010 under section 304 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the accused in the cross case under section 307/452/427/34 IPC, have already been enlarged on bail. Learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab on the instructions of Mr. Baldhir Singh, HC, who is present in person in the court, states that this is correct that the accused in the cross case has already been enlarged on bail. Considering totality of the facts and circumstanes of the case, I direct that let the petitioner be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (ALOK SINGH) JUDGE January 10, 2011 gurpreet