IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.16165 of 2011 BHAGIRATH MAHTO, SON OF BOADH MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BASARHI, P.S.-BODH GAYA IN THE DISTRICT OF GAYA. …..Petitioner. Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR …..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Subodh Kr. Barnwal, Advocate. For the State : APP. ----------- 02/ 09.06.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the Electricity Act. It has been alleged that the conduct of the petitioner has caused a loss of Rs. 2,60,000/- to the Bihar Electricity Board. It has also been alleged that the petitioner was using motor of five H.P. Submission is that the petitioner’s son has applied for electricity connection and the connection is yet to be provided. The petitioner is a man of 80 years and he was no concern with the keeping of the motor or anything. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the informant has opposed the prayer for 2 bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/court concerned, Gaya in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No. 223 of 2010. kksinha/- (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)