(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 262 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 262 OF 2004 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 262 OF 2004 Suhasini R.Kulkarni & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Sarita Joshi and Ors. ...Respondents ..... Mrs. Seema Sarnaik, counsel for Petitioners Mr. D.A. Patil, counsel for Respondents 1 and 2. ..... CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. B. H. MARLAPALLE, J. DATED: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005 DATED: 14TH FEBRUARY, 2005 P. C.:- P. C.:- P. C.:- 1. Heard Mrs. Sarnaik, the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 2. Admittedly, the petitioners are presently being paid their salary as per the 5th pay commission recommendations and so far as the payment of arrears is concerned, the amount has already been deposited on 26.10.2004 with the registry of this Court. It is also stated that the petitions are listed for final hearing and this Court is likely to consider the issue of disbursement of the deposited amount while deciding the writ petitions. (-2-) 3. Under such circumstances, nothing further survives in this contempt petition and the contempt petition is disposed of as infructuous. However, this order will not come in the way of the petitioners for applying to withdraw the amount.