SBCWP6193/2010 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6193/2010 Vedpal Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Others Date of Order ::: 03.05.2010 Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Hanuman Choudhary, Counsel for petitioner #### By the Court:- Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that petitioner was appointed on 29.03.1988 as 'beldar' in the office of Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department, Sub Division Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu. The respondent No.2, vide order dated 15.04.1994 declared several of his juniors as semi- permanent with effect from the date of completion of two years of service from their initial appointment. By said order as many as 18 such 'beldars' were declared semi-permanent mostly with effect from 31.07.1990. All, except first three persons, in that list were junior to the petitioner. Petitioner made number of representations and when nothing was done, he has therefore approached this Court. SBCWP6193/2010 // 2 // Having regard to the facts of the case, instead of directly entertaining this writ petition, I require the petitioner to make a suitable representation to the Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur, who shall examine the matter of the petitioner and, if on facts it is found that he is senior to those persons and completed two years of service, shall pass appropriate order with regard to grant of semi-permanent status to the petitioner. The representation of petitioner shall be decided within a period of three months. If the grievance of the petitioner is not remedied, he is free to make a reference of such dispute to the Industrial Court concerned. Writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. (Mohammad Rafiq) J. //Jaiman//