: 1 : IN IN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL APPEAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 720 OF 2007 FROM ORDER NO. 720 OF 2007 FROM ORDER NO. 720 OF 2007 M/s. Prashid Construction Pvt.Ltd. ... Appellants. V/s. Mrs. Anupama Vinod Shah & Anr. ... Respondents. Mr. R.S. Jaisinghani i/b. Jacinta D’Silva for the Appellants. Mr. P.M. Havnur for Respondents 1 & 2. Mr. H.C. Mehta i/b. Mehta & Co. for Respondents 3 & 4. CORAM CORAM CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. DATE DATE DATE : 12TH SEPTEMBER 2008. : 12TH SEPTEMBER 2008. : 12TH SEPTEMBER 2008. P.C. P.C. P.C. :- :- :- . This Appeal from Order is preferred against grant of ad-interim order by the Bombay City Civil Court dated 21st August 2007. The Appeal has been pending for admission for more than a year. Mr.Jaisinghani, learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that if the Notice of Motion pending in the City Civil Court is directed to be heard expeditiously, he will not press the Appeal from Order. There is an application filed by the Interveners for impleading themselves as parties to the Appeal proceedings. They have also taken out a Chamber Summons for impleading themselves as party Defendants in the suit. : 2 : 2. The Bombay City Civil Court to decide both the applications i.e. the Chamber Summons of third parties for impleading them as party Defendants to the Suit and the Notice of Motion within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the writ. 3. In view of the above order, the Appeal from Order is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Two Civil Applications taken out in the Appeal from Order also stands disposed of without any orders. (SMT. (SMT. (SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J.) R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J.) R.P. SONDURBALDOTA,J.)