tWGLE BENGH THE^IIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR W.P.(Cr.)No. S^f^L /2011 Jay @ Gudda Jaiswsd S/o late Bajrang Prasad Jai,swal aged about 30 years, R/o in fornt of Govt. High School, Dayal Band, P.S. City Kotwali, District Bilaspur (C.G.) PETinONER (InJail) ^a\eA.-- VERSUS RESPONDENT ^^ State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.). The Director General of Pojice, Police Headquarter Raipur-(C.G.) The Jail Superintendent, Gentral Jail Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur-fC.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF T] CONSTITUTION OF INDIA z^- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (Cr.) N0.5781 OF 201'1 PETITIONER Jay @ Gudda Jaiswal (In Jail) RESPONDENTS Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others .-^~ (Writ Petition underArticle 226 ofthe Constitution of India) Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J. , Present:- Shri Shakti Raj Sinha, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Dy. Adv. General with Shri Shashank Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State. QRDER (Passed on this 29th day of September, 2011) Heard learned counsel for the parties. By thispetition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the Jail authorities to provide proper medical treatment to the petitioner as and when required. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is suffering from several ailments including heart problem. Thus, a direction may be given to the Jail authorities to take the petitioner for proper medical checkup and treatment. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing for the State submits thatin respect of the ailment of the petitioner, the jail authorities have already moved the Sessions Court where the trial is pending in sessions case No. 169/10. The Sessions Judge has already directed to take the petitioner fof proper medical treatment. If grievance of the petitioner further survives in respect of his treatment, the petitioner may very well approach the trial Court i.e. the Sessions Court, whieh is fully competent to consider the grievances of the petitioner and pass appropriate order. 6. 7. -^. 8. Gowri The order dated 6-9-2011 ofthe learned Sessions Judge, Bilaspur, whereunder the Superintendent, Central Jail, Bilaspur, has been directed to take care of the petitioner, who is under trial prisoner, is taken on record. In view of foregoing, there is no reason to entertain this petition in exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India when matter is pending trial beforethe Sessions Court and the Sessions Court is fully competent to pass all the directions and orders to protect the health of the under trial prisoner i.e. the petitioner. As an upshot, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication and the same is accordingly disposed of. ,,;Sd/-' \ SatlshK.Agnihcai \ Judge e>