IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH AUGUST 2009 / 4TH BHADRA 1931 WP(C).No. 22898 of 2009(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- AJESH, S/O.MATTEKUDIYIL SOMAN, AGED 24, MATTEKUDIYIL HOUSE, KORANGAD, PERINGOME P.O. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.V.VIJULAL RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TALIPARAMBA. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAYYANNUR. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERINGOME POLICE STATION, PERINGOME. 4. JAYADEVAN, S/O.RAGHAVAN, CHILLAGU, PERINGOME P.O. 5. PRAMOD, S/O.PREMAN, PAYYANGANAM, PERINGOME P.O. 6. SIBI, S/O.VARGHESE, KARIPODU, PERINGOME P.O. 7. LATHEESH, S/O.GANAPATHY, UZHICHI, PERINGOME P.O. 8. VINEET, S/O.THAMPAN, UZHICHI, PERINGOME P.O. *ADDL.R9. PERINGOME VAYAKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KANNUR DISTRICT. *ADDL.R9 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 14-8-2009. ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN FOR R4-8 SRI.M.V.AMARESAN FOR ADDL.R9 SRI.V.N.RAMESAN NAMBISAN FOR ADDL.R9 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26/08/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P(C)No.22898/2009 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF DRIVING LICENCE OF THE PETITIONER DATED 22-5-2007 EXT.P2. TRUE COPY OF R.C.BOOK OF KL-59/A.9958 EXT.P3. TRUE COPY OF PERMIT DATED 5-8-2009 EXT.P4. TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 7-8-2009. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: EXT.R4(a) TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTION NO.55/04 DATED 9-8-2004 EXT.R4(b) TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTION NO.95/04(6) DATED 24-12-2004 OF THE PERINGOME VAYAKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT. EXT.R4(c) TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED SHOWING PAYMENT OF PARKING FEES TO THE PANCHAYAT. / TRUE COPY / P.S.TO JUDGE KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. ----------------------------------------- W.P(C)No.22898 of 2009 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of August, 2009 JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph,J. The Secretary of the Panchayat is present. Both sides submit that as of now there is no grievance since the petitioner is also permitted to have an accommodation at Peringome for his autorickshaw since no regulation as such regarding parking has been framed so far. In that view of the matter it is not necessary to keep the writ petition pending. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of making it clear that the autorickshaw of the petitioner shall also be permitted to operate at Peringome by using the parking facility subject to the space available there. In the event of any obstruction from any quarters, it will be open to the petitioner to bring the same to the notice of the first W.P(C)No.22898 of 2009 -:2:- respondent, in which case the first respondent will render necessary assistance for working out the order as above. (KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE) (C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE) ahg. KURIAN JOSEPH & C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ. --------------------------- W.P(C)No.22898 of 2009 ---------------------------- JUDGMENT 26th August, 2009