IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31062 of 2009 JAITUN NESHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 02 10.09.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioner, who is mother-in-law of the victim/ deceased, has approached this Court seeking bail in a case instituted under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Drawing attention of the Court to the F.I.R., it is contended that the allegation of demand is directly against the husband. It is next contended that the informant and other persons of the Naihar of the victim were duly informed. Learned counsel submits that the husband of the victim/ deceased is in custody. It is contended that deceased died of asphyxia, caused by hanging. He thus solicited bail as the petitioner is a lady and allegation of demand of dowry is not against her. She is in custody since 29.5.2009. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., West 2 Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No. 06 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors should be the own/ close family member of the petitioner. (ii) Once the case is taken up for framing of charge, the petitioner shall appear on each date fixed at the trial. In case, of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, it shall be open to the trial court to cancel his bail bond and secure his arrest in accordance with law. P.K. (K.K. Mandal, J .)