1 FARHAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1245 OF 2009 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders Shri. Rajendra Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner. Shri. K.B. Choudhari, A.G.P. for State. CORAM: V.C. DAGA & A.V. POTDAR, JJ. DATED: 15th JULY 2009 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the petition. 2. This petition is directed against the order dated 2.9.2008 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai, Bench at Aurangabad. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the impugned order suffers from error as the learned tribunal did not apply its mind while passing the impugned order. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon sections 48 and 58 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (General Conditions of Services) Rules, 1981 in support of his claim for 2 additional financial benefit for doing additional work. 3. After having gone through the same and having examined the impugned order, we are of the opinion that the view taken by the tribunal is reasonable and possible view and the Tribunal has rightly held that petitioner was not entitled to claim benefit as claimed by him. 4. In the result, petition is dismissed in liminie being devoid of any substance with no order as to costs. [A.V. POTDAR, J.] [ V.C. DAGA, J.] ssc/wp1245.09