IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 43 OF 2010 SHRI CAETANO REMEDIO DOURADO AND 4 ORS., ... Petitioners Versus SMT. OLINDA DOURADO AND ANR., ... Respondents Shri Sudesh Usgoankar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri Nitin Sardessai, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 30th July, 2010 P.C.:- Heard learned Counsel for the parties. The plaintiff has filed the suit claiming to be a co-owner along with Defendant Nos.1 and 6. Before filing the written statement, Defendant Nos.1 to 5 filed an application to appoint a Commissioner. The application for appointment has been dismissed by the learned trial Court by Order dated 23-12-2009 impugned in this Writ Petition. Since then, the written statement has been filed. On behalf of the plaintiff, it is submitted that the said Defendants are free to get their own Commissioner appointed to inspect and submit his report as stated by the plaintiff in para 24 of reply dated 9-12-2009. This statement of the plaintiff is accepted. An apprehension is expressed by the Petitioners that in case they get their own Commissioner appointed, the plaintiff and Defendant No.6 will interfere with them. In case, there is any such apprehension of interference, the Defendant Nos.1 to 5 are free to approach the learned trial Court and seek police protection. In the circumstances, therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this petition. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.