1 cr-wp-390-11 jdk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. WRIT PETITION NO. 390 OF 2011 Mohammed Eshaq Ali Vadagama ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents .... Mr. R.A.Shaikh Advocate for Petitioner Mrs. S.V.Gajare A.P.P. for Respondent-State Mr. Sharif Shaikh Advocate for Respondent 2. .... CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND N.D.DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : MARCH 15, 2011 PER COURT: 1 This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by which the petitioner prays vide prayer clause (a) to call for record and proceedings of F.I.R. No. 1891 of 2010 dated 12.10.2010 registered by respondent 1 and after perusing the same, respondents 1 and 4 may be directed to add respondent 2 as an accused in F.I.R. No. 1891 of 2010. Vide prayer clause (b) to the petition, the petitioner has prayed for directing respondent 3 to initiate appropriate action against respondent 1 police station for shielding and protecting respondent 2. 2 cr-wp-390-11 2 The learned A.P.P. states on instructions that for the relief in respect of prayer clause (a) to the petition, has been granted as respondent 2 had already been joined as an accused. In that light of the matter therefore according to us, this petition in so far as it relates to prayer clause (a) is concerned, does not survive for consideration. In respect of prayer clause (b) to the petition, the learned Counsel for the petitioner states that an appropriate application seeking similar relief has already been presented to the Commissioner of Police. We therefore permit the petitioner to pursue the aforesaid application. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs. [N.D.DESHPANDE, J.] [ P.V.HARDAS, J. ]