\/'/^^ i Sh-Bea,^ 1 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, J. WIisc. Appeal (C) No. 331 of 2009 ^NN^ Appellants Respondents 3. Smt. Tineshwari Bai, age 32 yrs, w/o late Namdas Baghel, occupation House wife. Chandan Prakash, age 14 yrs, s/o late Namdas Baghel. Ajay Prakash, age 11 yrs, s/o late Namdas Baghel. Dev Prakash, age 9 yrs, s/o late Namdas Baghel. Kumari Neelam, age 6 yrs, d/o late Namdas Baghel on behalf of minor appellant no.2 to 5, their mother Smt. Tineshwari Bai, as a next friend (Vad Mithra) All resident of Rajiv Nagar, Mahoba Bazaar, thana Aamanaka, Raipur, tah. & distt. Raipur C.G. VERSUS Kishore Kumar Sahu, s/o Ganeshram Sahu, age 32 yrs, occupation Jeep driver R/o Nehru Ward, Bhatapar, thana Bhatapara City, Tahsil Bhatapara, district Raipur C.G. Angadram Sahu, s/o Dalluram Sahu, r/o New Ganj Ward, Bhatapara, Tahsil Bhatapara, distt. Raipur C.G. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd through Div. Manager, Board Office, No.1 Katcheri Chowk, Jail Road, RaipurC.G. if' }/'s!eS^ /r/'^'\ f 'ki^ MAC No. 331 of 2009 IVIemo of appeal under SectionJ73 otMotor Vehicle Act Present: None for the appellants. Shri A.K. Athaley, counsel for respondent No.3. ORDER •th (25InAugust,2011) The following order of the Court was passed by Rajeev Gupta, C.J. None for the appellants. 2) As there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, we are left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- ChiefJustiee nimmi Sd/- Rangnath Chandrakar Judge