IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 18TH AUGUST 2011 / 27TH SRAVANA 1933 WP(C).No. 19553 of 2003(C) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M.V. SANKARANARAYANAN, LINE HELPER, ELECTRICAL WING, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH G. PRABHU RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2. THE VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3. P.ABDURAHIMAN, SENIOR ELECTRICIAN, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT ADV. SRI.K.RAVEENDRAN FOR R3 SRI.E.S.ASHRAF, SC, CALICUT UNIVERSITY FOR R1,R2 SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW FOR R1-2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER ON I.A.NO.5953 OF 2003 IN WP(C).No. 19553 of 2003(C) DISMISSED 18.8.2011 SD/- T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE APPPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE STATE BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION DATED 19.11.1994. EXT.P2 COPY OF THE ORDER OF R1 DATED 7.7.2000 PROMOTING R3 AS OVERSEER (ELECTRICAL) EXT.P3 COPY OF THE ORDER OF R1 REVERTING R3 FROM THE POST OF OVERSEER (ELECTRICAL) TO THAT OF SENIOR ELECTRICIAN, DATED 7.1.2002. /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE. cl T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J. ----------------------------------- W.P.(C). No.19553 OF 2003 --------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2011 JUDGMENT The Writ Petition was filed by the petitioner who was working as a Line Helper in the Electrical Wing of Calicut University is challenging the promotion of the 3rd respondent as Overseer(Electrical) in the Engineering Department of the University. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for the University submitted that during the pendency of the Writ Petition, the petitioner has also been promoted and the 3rd respondent has already retired from service. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no further orders are called for in the Writ Petition. In the light of the subsequent developments, the Writ Petition is closed. Sd/-( T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE) dsn