IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32004 of 2011 Gupta Yadav @ Jai Prakash Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3. 25.11.2011 Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner be kept on the record. By an order dated 26.9.2011 the petitioner was granted bail after framing of charge if his case is not bifurcated for purposes of commitment or charge. However the Trial Court is not releasing the petitioner since his case had been bifurcated earlier. It has been submitted that initially the case of the petitioner was bifurcated, thereafter, it has been amalgamated with that of the co-accused persons and there is no other accused wanting in this case and charge has been framed. The further submission is that the wife of the petitioner is no more and, therefore, the son-in-law of the petitioner namely, Binod Kumar Yadav be substituted in his place. The order is clarified and modified to the extent that the petitioner be released on bail if the charge has been framed and one of the bailors shall be his son-in-law and not his wife. Let this order be communicated to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No. 17 of 2010 through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)