THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4234 OF 2009 AND CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4233 OF 2009 Dated: 10.09.2009 Between: G.P. Sanjeeva Reddy, Anantapur District. .. Petitioner And V. Thimmarayappa, Anantapur District. … Respondent THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4234 OF 2009 AND CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4233 OF 2009 COMMON ORDER : The petitioner in these two Revision petitions is the judgment- debtor. The respondent herein filed E.P.No.171 of 2006 for execution of money decree obtained in O.S.No.307 of 2004 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Hindupur by arrest of the judgment-debtor. During the enquiry, the judgment-debtor deposed as R.W.1, however initially the decree-holder did not choose to cross-examine him and therefore the Execution Petition was posted for further steps on 5.11.2007. On the next date of hearing on 14.11.2007 the decree- holder/respondent filed E.A.No.399 of 2007 and E.A.No.400 of 2007 seeking permission to reopen the evidence and to recall R.W.1 for cross-examination. Both the said applications were allowed by the Court below by orders dated 30.04.2009 on payment of costs of Rs.250/-. Aggrieved by the same, the judgment-debtor filed C.R.P.No.4234 of 2009 as against the order in E.A.No.399 of 2007 thereby reopening the evidence of R.W.1. Similarly C.R.P.No.4233 of 2009 has been fled against the order in E.A.No.400 of 2007 whereunder R.W.1 was recalled. Having heard the learned counsel for both the parties and having perused the material on record, I do not find any justifiable reason to interfere with the discretion exercised by the Court below in reopening the matter and recalling R.W.1 for cross-examination. The discretion exercised by the Court below cannot be said to be arbitrary or perverse and does not suffer from any legal infirmity warranting interference by this Court in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, these two Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. No costs. _____________ G. ROHINI,J. Dt. 10.09.2009 Klp