(1) CRI. APPLN.1870.2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1870 OF 2007 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. OF 2007 Chintaman Sahebrao Patil APPLICANT VERSUS Kautik @ Nana Idhan Patil and ors. RESPONDENTS ..... Mr. P.P. Paratwagh, Advocate h/f. Mr. Amol S. Sawant, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Shrimant Mundhe, Advocate h/f. Mr. S.P. Brahme, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 4 Mr. B.V. Wagh, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. ..... CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J. DATED : 6TH APRIL, 2011 ORAL ORDER:- 1. Heard. 2. The applicant is seeking condonation of delay in preferring Criminal Revision against the order of acquittal recorded by the learned Sessions Judge. He submits that since he was pursuing the State to file Appeal against the order of acquittal, delay of 62 days has occasioned. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the applicant himself is an Advocate and, (2) CRI. APPLN.1870.2007 therefore, he is well aware of the provisions of law and, therefore, he submits that the Application be dismissed. 4. Considering the fact that the applicant was pursuing the State to file Appeal, which naturally would have wider scope, he could not have filed Revision within time. Since the applicant has made out sufficient cause, the Application is allowed. Delay in filing the Criminal Revision Application is condoned. The Registry to register the Criminal Revision Application as per the due procedure of law. Sd/- [M.T. JOSHI, J.] arp