WPCRL No. 371 of 2011 With Stay App. No. 4891 / 11 Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J. Mr. K.S. Verma, Advocate, with Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Bohara, Brief Holder, present for State. Mr. B.S. Bhandari, Advocate, present for respondent No. 3 Lokesh Kumar @ Bablu. Heard. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought quashing of the first information report dated 26.04.2011, registered as Crime No. 169 of 2011, relating to offence punishable under Section 364 of I.P.C., at police station Jwalapur, District Haridwar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that only due to suspicion the petitioner has been named in the aforesaid case (though he is not named in the first information report). It is further submitted that the petitioner is a lawyer, and has no role in commission of crime On the other hand, attention of this court is drawn on behalf of the State to Annexure C.A. 8 to the petition, showing criminal history of the petitioner Vinod Kumar Anand. It is also pointed out that witness Ram Prakash S/o Om Prakash had last seen Khemlata (lady said to have been abducted) with petitioner Vinod Kumar Anand on 18.04.2011 between 4:30 and 5:00 p.m. She is still not traceable. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties, and after going through the papers on record, this court finds no force in this writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that if the petitioner Vinod Kumar Anand surrenders before the court concerned, his bail application shall be heard and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (Stay Application No. 4891 of 2011 also stands disposed of). (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) 27.06.2011 HN