1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9290 OF 2009 ............................................................. Office Notes,Office memorandum of Coram, appearances,Court's Court's or orders or directions Judge's orders & Registrar's orders. ............................................................. Mr.S.D.Patil for the petitioner None for the respondents CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE : FEBRUARY 5,2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. The petitioners are the original plaintiffs. By this Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the challenge is to the order dated 14th September 2009 by which the earlier order passed by the trial Court to proceed without the written statement of the respondent has been set aside. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order is illegal and no exceptional circumstances have been set out in the application. 2 The effect of the impugned order is that the written statement of the respondents has been taken on record. Substantial justice has been done under the 2 impugned order. Hence no case for interference in writ jurisdiction is made out. Writ Petition is rejected. JUDGE