1 adms71-11.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ADMIRALTY & VICE ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION ADMIRALTY SUIT NO. 71 OF 2011 Euroceanica (UK) Ltd .. Plaintiff versus m.v.Gem of Paradip .. Defendant Mr.Venkatesh Dhond, Sr.Adv with Mr.Shrikant Hathi with Ms.Binita Hathi i/by Brus Chambers for the plaintiff. Mr.Shiv Iyer i/by M/s.Bose & Mitra & Co for the defendant. Ms.Ritcha Sahay i/by Mr.Ashwin Shanker for the caveators. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. 28th November 2011. P.C.: . Mentioned. Not on board. 2 It is stated on behalf of the plaintiff that the claim of the plaintiff in this suit has been settled and, therefore, the plaintiff has instructed its advocate to apply for withdrawal of the suit. The plaintiff has no objection to the vessel being released from arrest. 3 My attention is invited by Mr.Dhond to the two caveats against release, which have been lodged and details of which are also provided to the Court. It is stated that the caveator's advocate has 2 adms71-11.doc been given notice and they are present in the Court. 4 On instructions, the caveator's advocate states that the caveators have no objection to the vessel being released from arrest and being allowed to sail because their claims are also being settled by the defendant. 5 In the light of these statements, the suit is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed off as such. Refund of Court fees as per rules. 6 Vessel is released from arrest and shall be permitted to sail. 7 Instrument of release is dispensed with. 8 Port, Customs and all concerned authorities to act on a fax copy, e-mail and/or authenticated copy of this order. (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J)