1 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.07.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN W.P.(MD)No.7183 of 2011 M.Ramalingam : Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by the Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai - 4. 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tamilnadu Railway Police, Egmore, Chennai. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Tamilnadu Railway Police, Egmore, Chennai. : Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to accord upgradation to the petitioner to the post of special sub-inspector of police on the date of the petitioner's completion of 25 years of total service along with eligible arrears of pay and allowance from time to time to avoid disparity strictly in the light of G.O.(Ms) No.15 Home (Police-V) Department dated 07.01.2010 within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.B.S.Meltiue For Respondents : Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohaideen, A.G.P. ORDER ****** Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 2.By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing. 3.The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition for a mandamus directing the respondents to accord upgradation to the petitioner to the post of special sub-inspector of police on the date of the petitioner's completion of 25 years of total service along with eligible arrears of pay and allowance from time to time to avoid disparity strictly in the light of G.O.(Ms) No.15 Home (Police-V) Department dated 07.01.2010 within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court. 4.Seeking such relief, the petitioner sent a representation dated 08.04.2011, 29.04.2011 and 26.05.2011 to the respondents. However, the same have not been considered so far. Hence, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition for the relief stated earlier. 5.Considering the limited scope of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the claim made by the petitioner, I direct the 4th respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 08.04.2011 on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.This writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. arul Sd/- Assistant Registrar[AE] /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, State of Tamilnadu Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai - 4. 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tamilnadu Railway Police, Egmore, Chennai. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Tamilnadu Railway Police, Egmore, Chennai. +1 cc to Mr.B.S.Meltiue, Advocate SR.No.21076. +1 cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No.21485. Order made in W.P.(MD) No.7183 of 2011 Dated:01.07.2011 2P/7C RPB 13.07.2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/