In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2396 of 2010 Date of Decision: 28.1.2011 Veena Rani …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA. Present: By Post. Mr. Mehardeep Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent. Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral) A telegram, sent by Veena Rani, has been received by the Registry of this Court on 29.11.2010 and the same has been treated as a writ petition. It is stated therein that Jyoti Rani, minor daughter of the petitioner, has been enticed away by Deepu son of Tarsem Lal and his relations. Learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions from Sukhdev Singh, Assistant Sub Inspector, submits that the alleged detenue Jyoti Rani has been recovered and is now residing with her parents. He further submits that a compromise has been effected between the parties. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent, no further directions are called for and the present writ petition is disposed of. (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia) Judge January 28, 2011 “DK”