IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITIONfS) NOg‘Bi OF 2008' Wamndra Kunjam S/o Shri D.D. Kunjam, Aged 25 years, MDS 120, Sant Kabir Nagar, Sondungari, Raipur (C.G.) yERsus RESPONDENTS V State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Health, DKS, Bhawan, Raipur (CG) Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through its Chairman, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Controller of Examinations, Public Service Commission, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 4 0°? ar Principal, Autonomous Government Ayurvedic College, Gwalior (M.P.) Dr. KL. Mishra, Professor, Autonomous Government Ayurvedic College, Gwalior (M.P.) £RIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22gOF THE CONSTITUTION QEIINDIA PETITIO NER { . gums) 5w /08 W W" Hi 200 31mm (Wu) maféam WW wW $31‘f‘aqm SB:, Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker 25.10.2010: Shri P.S. Koshy counsel f0! the petitioner. Shri Vivek Sharma PL for tf e respondent No.1. Shri YtC. Sharma counsel far respondents 2 and 3r At the outset, counsel for he petitioner submits that perhaps the petitioner has no case on me'its because on~ 28.10.2006 he had technically not completed his pulsory Rotatory Internship and that being so the internship certificate issued on 26.102006 (Annexure P-2) may not be helpful to himt He fu her submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petiti n with liberty to prosecute the other petition {\N.P.(S) 1545/2008} w ich has already been filed by him challenging the action of the res ondents — PSC debarring him for 10 years from appearing in any of th examination conducted by it vide order dated 20.2.2008. He however su may take a lenient view while Counsel for the respondents su it thatvthey have no objection if the other petition filed by the peti oner is considered and decided in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is ismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. its that in the other petition this Court sidering the case of the petitioner Sd/- Judge i i Pritinker Diwaker: C b n b