IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.3329 OF 2010 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions Court’s or Judge’s orders and Registrar’s orders. Mr. V.S.Talkute for Petitioner Mr.U.P.Warunjikar for Respondent no.1 Ms.M.S.Bane AGP for State Mr.V.M.Mali for Respondent no.2 CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE : 2nd August, 2010. P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and for the respondents. 2. The writ petition is directed against the judgment dated 5th April, 2010 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune in Appeal No.A/GramPanchayat/STR/45/2009 whereby the said appeal preferred by the respondents came to be dismissed. Learned counsel for the respondents brought to our notice the observations made by the appellate authority in para 3 (iii) those are as follows: “ The contention of the appellant that the office copies of the bills numbers 4460 and 4461, produced before this authority show scratches (scoring out of some matter) against the word,...........creates a doubt as to the genuineness of the service of the bills, needs to be accepted, given the status of the said bills as produced before this authority. “ 3. In view of the above referred observations, it will be appropriate to grant liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate steps in accordance with law after the report is submitted by the C.E.O. Zilla Parishad,Satara in view of the provisions of section 14 (1) (h)of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958. In the circumstances, writ petition is disposed of by keeping the issues open with liberty to the petitioner as mentioned herein above. Interim order dated .4.5.2010 to continue till the C.E.O. submits a report. D.D. SINHA, J. MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.