IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.8091 of 2009 DR.AJAY KRISHNA KEOLYAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.15161 of 2008 DR.SHYAM NANDAN SHARMA Versus PATNA UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.16167 of 2008 PROF.PRAMOD KUMAR SINHA Versus PATNA UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.18897 of 2008 DR.(MRS.)SHARDA SINHA Versus PATNA UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.18900 of 2008 DR.HARI SHANKER SINGH Versus PATNA UNIVERSITY & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.482 of 2009 ] DR.(SMT.)SHAKUNTALA VERMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.578 of 2009 SUBHASH CHANDRA GHOSH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.664 of 2009 PROF.NAGENDRA PRASAD VERMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.731 of 2009 DR.PARAS NATH SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.18911 of 2008 DR.MRS.LILA SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.18155 of 2008 2 RADHESHWAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.17984 of 2008 RAMESHWAR PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.8398 of 2009 DR.MADAN PRASAD SINHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- WITH CWJC No.14796 of 2008 DR.BADRI NATH SHUKLA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS ----------- 3. 12.08.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and the respondent University. All the writ applications relates to the payment of retiral dues, as such they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The grievances of the petitioner in these writ applications are with regard to payment of retiral dues which according to the petitioners have not been settled as yet despite the fact that petitioners have superannuated from the service of the University quite a long time back Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent University submits that in case petitioners file separate representation stating details of their pending claims, the same would be considered without delay as per law. 3 In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for expeditious disposal of their outstanding claims on account of their superannuation, petitioners propose to file representations/fresh representations before the Registrar of the Patna University stating all their claims separately enclosing the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of such claim alongwith certified copy of the present order within a period of four weeks from today. In case such representations are filed, the Registrar, Patna University shall consider each of the claims raised by the petitioners in their representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation so that the admitted claims of the petitioner could be paid without delay. However, if any of the claims are found not admissible as per law, the same should be communicated to the petitioners along with reasons therewith. All the above writ applications are disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)