IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.5471 of 2011 SRI SHIVENDRA BARIAR, SON OF LATE GAYA PRASAD AMBATHA, RESIDENT OF LOHSINGNA ROAD, HAZARIBAGH, P.S. SADAR, HAZARIBAGH, JHARKHAND. ... ... PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA. 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND MINERALS, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE JOINT SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND MINERALS, GOVT. OF LBIHAR, PATNA. 4. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND MINERALS, DISTRICT MINES OFFICE, GAYA. 5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT MINES OFFICE, GAYA. 6. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E), BIHAR, PATNA. ... ... RESPONDENTS. ----------- 2. 29.3.2011. Heard Shri Shantanu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Rakesh Kumar Chandram, learned A.C. to S.C.18, appearing on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 5 and also learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.6/Accountant General. The petitioner, who retired with effect from 1.9.2003 from the post of Mines Inspector and functioning as Assistant Mining Officer, Gaya, has prayed for directing the respondents to make payment of monetary benefit of 2nd A.C.P., which was granted vide Annexure-1 to the petition i.e. Memo No.180 dated 2.2.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 2 petitioner had earlier filed representation and the Assistant Director, Mines and Mining Department, Gaya vide Annexure-4 to the writ petition, has requested the Director, Mines and Minerals Department, Government of Bihar, Patna for sending his Service Book. However, on one plea or the other, actual benefit has not been given to the petitioner. The writ petition is being disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent nos.3 and 5 enclosing therewith photo copy of Service Book within a period of six weeks from today. If such representation is filed, both the respondents i.e. respondent nos.3 and 5 are directed to examine the same and pass appropriate order redressing the grievance of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representation. If the respondents consider the claim of the petitioner as genuine, they are required to issue sanction order within two months from the date of filing of such representation. It is expected that 3 after receipt of the sanction order, the respondent no.6/Accountant General will issue authorization within one month from the date of receipt of sanction from the State Government. With aforesaid observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)