C.R No.779 of 2010 (O&M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : March 25, 2010 1. C.R No.779 of 2010 (O&M) Jagmal Singh and others vs Haryana State and others 2. C.R No.1052 of 2010 Kamal vs State of Haryana and another 3. C.R No.1053 of 2010 Bhagwan Singh vs State of Haryana and another 4. C.R No.1054 of 2010 Rohtas Singh and another vs The State of Haryana and others 5. C.R No.1055 of 2010 Ram Kishan and others vs Haryana State and others 6. C.R No.1304 of 2010 Rohtash Singh and another vs State of Haryana and another 7. C.R No.1375 of 2010 Naresh Kumar and others vs The State of Haryana and others 8. C.R No.1500 of 2010 Lalman vs The State of Haryana and others 9. C.R No.1764 of 2010 Shiv Lal vs The State of Haryana and others *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr. Narinder Sura, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Paramjit Batta, Addl.A.G Haryana for the State of Haryana. C.R No.779 of 2010 (O&M) ::2:: 1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? *** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral) This order shall dispose of CR Nos.779, 1052, 1053, 1054, 1055, 1304, 1375, 1500 and 1764 of 2010. These petitions have been filed against the impugned order(s) whereby despite the fact that no stay was granted by this Court in first appeal/s filed by the State of Haryana, the executing Court has directed that 50% of the compensation amount be given to the claimants against bank guarantee. Counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance on the decision of this Court dated 12.10.2009 in CR No.3912 of 2009, Samey Singh v. State of Haryana and others, whereby a similar conditional order with regard to the release of compensation amount passed by the executing Court was set aside. To the similar effect are the orders passed by this Court in C.R No.7613 of 2009 decided on 29.1.2010 and CR No.848 of 2010 decided on 10.2.2010. Counsel for the State of Haryana is not in a position to deny that the aforesaid decisions cover the present petitions. He is also not in a position to bring any contrary judgment. In the absence of any stay by the higher Court, the executing Court is bound to execute the decree. Consequently, these revision petitions are allowed and the impugned orders are set aside. The executing Court is directed to disburse the payment of compensation to the claimants. As the main petitions have since been dismissed, all the C.R No.779 of 2010 (O&M) ::3:: pending civil miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) March 25, 2010. JUDGE `kk'