IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.3586 of 2009 SONU KUMAR SON OF RAGHU NATH MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE – USARI SIKARPUR, P.S. SAHPUR, DISTRICT – PATNA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR With Cr.Misc. No.4311 of 2009 TUNTUN KUMAR SON OF MUNDRIKA RAI, RESIDENT OF USARI SHIKARPUR, P.S. SAHPUR, DISTRICT – PATNA. Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 5.3.2009. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Both the bail applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order because they have arisen out of on occurrence under sections 461 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Informant Kumar Anjani reported that the petitioners who were employees of the Vodafone Tower have suspectedly stolen away BTX Cable. Later on the petitioners were caught. Submission is that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. There is complete violation of Section 100 Cr.P.C. There has been no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have fare antecedent. They are in custody since 23.10.2008. In fact, there was dispute with the petitioners and the informant and the informant unnecessarily roped the petitioners in this case. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like - 2 - amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Rajesh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Munger in connection with Bariarpur P.S. Case No. 74 of 2008. Md.S (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)