IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.6070 of 2009 PHULENDRA KUMAR SINGH Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ----------- For the Petitioner: Mr4 Manish Kumar, Advocate For the Union of India: Mr Sudhir Singh, Advocate Mr Sarva Deo Singh,Advocate ------- 2. 14.05.2009 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the Union of India. In pursuance of an advertisement dated 13.8.2002 the petitioner applied for appointment on the post of Constable in CRPF, a Para Military Force. The petitioner was medically examined also and found fit. A merit list was prepared and recommendations made for appointment. Letter of appointment was then issued to the petitioner. It appears that subsequently certain issues cropped up of alleged illegality/irregularities in the appointment leading to the matter being referred to the Central Bureau of Investigation. It is the case of the petitioner that he was asked to proceed for home when after enquiry the Central Bureau of Investigation has cleared his appointment. Thereafter in September 2005 the petitioner was informed that since two years had passed by that time he was required to appear at a fresh medical test. The petitioner was reexamined when now he was declared to have defective eye vision and hypertension. The petitioner protested against the same when he has now been informed that there was no provision for a second medical examination. Reliance is placed on an order of this Court ion CWJC No. 14711 of 2004 affirmed in LPA that after the Central Bureau of Investigation had cleared their appointment the respondents were obliged to take them back in service. The respondents on 1.9.2005 themselves asked the petitioner to appear for fresh medical test. They themselves on 15.1.2007 are saying that there is no provision for a fresh medical test. In between, a fresh medical test has already been held. To this Court even the defect alleged to have been pointed out in the medical test is hardly of any relevance considering that both the diseases are treatable. The writ application is accordingly allowed. The respondents are directed to accept the joining and allot duties to the petitioner in accordance with law. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)