> C^' -^B ^ IN THE HI6H COURTOF eHHATTIS6ARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION TclNo. '50-^2—^20ll -^ - PETITIONERS: 1. Ajay Kumar Rai, son of Shri Brijnath Rai, aged38 years, Licencee of Foreign Liquor Shop-Parsada, Bilaspur (CG), resident of Devrikhurd, Bilaspur (C6). 2. Ashutosh Yadav, son of Shri Amardev Yadav, aged 27 years, resident of Parsada, Bilaspur (C6) ^ ^ ^ ,^^ P/\:-^<3 .^•^^^ ^r).^€^-'v ...'"".-^y ^^';" ^y dy- Vs RESPONOENTSl ^ 2. Excise -^. 1. 2. 3. 1. State of ChhaTtJsgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Excise, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Commissioner, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. ^ ^ .. 3. Collector, bistrict Bilaspur. 4. Excise Sub-Inspector, City Circle-1, Excise Department, Bilaspur (C6) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INCtlA. PARTICULAR OF THE PETITIONERS: As shown in the cause title. PARTICULARS OF THERESPONbENTS: As shown in the cause title. PARTICUL/kRSOF OR&ER A6AINST WHICH THE PRESCNT PETITION IS MAbE: i^i^s^^^;?ss ;Hi WiHiies HIGH COURT OF CHHATTiSGARH : BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (0 N0. 3052 OF 2011 PETiTIONERS RESPONDENTS. Ajav Kumar Rai & Another Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others (Writ Petition under Article 22S of the Constitution of India) Sing!e Bench : Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J.- Present:- Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri V.V.S.Moorthy, Dy. Advocate Genera! for the State. ORDER fORAU (Passed o" this 21st day ofjune, 20-<1) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to wlthdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to arternative remedy, as provided under the provisions of the Excise Act and Ruies framed thereunder. 2. Learned counsei appeanng for other side has no objection. 3. It isordered as prayed for. 4. Accordingiy, the writ petition is dismissed aswithdrav/n wi'th ihe above- statedlibertv. :'Sd/-.':,";' ^atisllilC.AgnihotFi' Judge ashok