1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR O R D E R S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.722/2006 (I.G.N.P. Shramik Ekta Kendra (CITU) & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of order : 21.8.2008 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. R.S. Saluja, for the petitioners. Mr. N.M. Lodha, Addl. Advocate General. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs : “(A) the proposed amendment of Schedule by the Chief Engineer may kindly be immediately acted upon without seeking any concurrence or amendment in this regard from the Department of Personnel or Finance Department; (B) that alternatively without prejudice to aforesaid if at all it is felt that concurrent of Department of Personnel and Finance is necessary for aforesaid purpose then till such concurrence is 2 received the post of Mates may be designated as Supervisor Gr.II on account of similarity of work and pay.” The case of the petitioners' association is that the Chief Engineer while considering the entire matter sent a communication Annexure-9 to the State Government on 16.5.2003 for deciding the claim with regard to grant of selection scale in the pay scale of Work Supervisor Grade-I in pay-scale No.6. The matter is still pending with the State Government and as per learned counsel for the petitioners' association, the controversy involved in this case has been decided by this Court in SB Civil Writ Petition No.4926/1999 vide judgment dated 22.5.2000 and SB Civil Writ Petition No.6694/2006 (Pramod Kumar Vs. State of Raj.) decided on 13.3.2008. Learned Addl. Advocate General prayed that this writ petition has been filed jointly by Association, therefore, it is not maintainable and same may be dismissed. In view of the fact that same directions sought by the petitioner Association have already been given in SB Civil Writ Petition No.5650/2004 (Lakh Raj & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) decided today i.e. on 21.8.2008, the petitioner association may also file 3 representation and upon filing representation, the same may be decided in light of above cited judgments within a period of three months from today. With the aforesaid observation/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun