IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 525 of 1991 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? CHANDUBHAI BHALABHAI VAGHELA Versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SAURABH MEHTA for MR YN OZA for Petitioners No. 1-3 MS NANDINI JOSHI, AGP for Respondents No. 1-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 29/07/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr. Saurabh Mehta who appears for Mr. Y.N. Oza for the petitioners states that as stated in para 7 of the petition, the question of the recovery of market rent which is raised in this petition was also raised in Special Civil Application No.2591 of 1987 but the said petition has been dismissed and that he himself had appeared in the said matter. He submitted that the issue raised in this petition is concluded against the petitioner by the decision in the said Special Civil Application No.2591 of 1987. In the circumstances, this petition does not survive and hence, it is dismissed. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief stands vacated. ****** hki