IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.No.196 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 7.12.2010 Smt. Seema Bhasin ....Petitioner Versus Pardeep Kumar Bhasin ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present : Mr.Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Rupan Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent. ..... MAHESH GROVER, J. There is no legal infirmity in the impugned order. During the pendency of the suit the property whose ownership is seriously in dispute it has been directed to be retained as it is under restraint of alienation which had been granted by the trial court. The parties to the litigation are an estranged couple. In this view of the matter, the interim relief granted by the learned trial court is justified and no interference is warranted in revisional jurisdiction with a discretion wisely exercised by the learned trial Court. Dismissed. 7.12.2010 (MAHESH GROVER) JUDGE dss