IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.15528 of 2010 SHEO SHANKAR SINGH SON OF LATE KAILASH SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O.- KAPSIYA, P.O.- NAGDAH (RTS), P.S. BEGUSARAI (TOWN) DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF H.R.D. (HIGHER EDUCATION) GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY THROUG ITS REGISTRAR, KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA 3. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY, KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA 4. THE REGISTRAR, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY, KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA 5. THE FINANCE OFFICER, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY, KAMESHWAR NAGAR, DARBHANGA 6. THE PRINCIPAL, G.D. COLLEGE UNDER L.N.M.U. BEGUSARAI ----------- 2 16.09.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the respondent-University. The petitioner had earlier filed a writ petitioner vide C.W.J.C. No. 1149 of 2007 with regard to payment of retiral dues. Later on for the alleged non-compliance of the order a contempt application vide M.J.C. No. 744 of 2009 was filed. During the pendency of the contempt application the University made the necessary payments as detailed in the letter no. 1180 dated 7th November, 2009 however with liberty that if there be any discrepancy or any objection with regard to calculation it will be open for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the University. Pursuant to the same petitioner file a representation as contained in Annexure-2. On perusal of the said representation it does not appear that any calculation mistake or objection has been brought to the - 2 - notice of the University. In fact petitioner by filing the representation has again claimed the arrears of salary which was already paid through the cheque no. 009512 dated 06.11.2009 as mentioned in the aforesaid letter dated 07.11.2009. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- University submits that the petitioner has not brought to the notice of the University any mistake in calculations or any objection. Considering the submissions of the parties, this Court does not find any merit in the writ application and the same accordingly stands dismissed. However, it will be open for the petitioner to bring it to the notice of the University with regard to any discrepancy in the payment as per the liberty given by the University in its letter dated 07.11.2009. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)