IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.11070 of 2010 1. MERAJ AHMAD, SON OF LATE SK. KAMAL. 2. SARVAR ALI, SON OF MAHMOOD ALAM @ WAKAR. 3. MAHMOOD ALAM @ WAKAR, SON OF LATE SK. MUSTAQEEM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 28.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 379, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3 (i)(x) of the S.C. and S.T. Prevention of Atrocities Act. In the present case the petitioners No. 1 and 2 were ordered to be released on bail by an order dated 20.4.2010 but with regard to petitioner No. 3, his antecedent was called for. The report reveals that the petitioner is an accused in two other cases but both of them are under Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act. In view of such, let the petitioner No. 3 above named, who is in custody since 11.2.2010, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah Distt. West Champaran, in Sikta P.S. Case No. 8 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to 2 furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled. S.Ali ( Anjana Prakash, J.)