m ^r' fclfc^. -^^ H!©HCOURT OF CHHATTiSOARH AT BILASPUR W. p, No, 389 OL2002 r^^l.jUVSs^j 'yi's G.H. Jani Bsdi's . Pvt. Ltd., Kamptee Lane, Rajnandgaon (C.G.), through its Managing Director Shri iviahesh Jani S/'o iate Gunavant Rai Jani, aged about 44 years, P./o Kamptee Lane, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Versus Respondents 1. Rajgami Sampadha through its Manager, Rajgami Sampadha, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 2. Tehsildar Rajnandgaon, Dist : Rajnandgaon - (C.G.) Writ petitlon uncier Articte 226)"27ofShe Constltutton of tndia SJngle Bsnch : Hor.'ble Mr. Justice Satish K. AgnihoSri. Pres nt: Shri P.K. Bhaduri, counsei for the petitioner. Shri B.P. Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. Q RD E R (Passed on this 28l day ofJune,2007) and (1) By thls peSISton, the petffioner seeks to cha.'tenge the !ega!ifr/ and vajidity of the notice dated 08.02.2CXE (Annexur®A-7), v/hereby the petitloner was ca!!ed upon to dsposit the ba!ance amount of Rs.2,02,875/- as arresrs of rent. (2) Be! Being aggrieyed, the petitioner has chal!enged the cslculation of arrears of rent for the property in question in this petition under Article 226 of the Constltution of India. According to tearned counse! for She petitioner, the property is a State property, thus, the pstitioner cannot take recourse So remedy under the provisions of the Chhattlsgarh Accommodatlon Control Act, 1861. (3) The facts involved in thi's petition are disputsd questions of facts and Shere is no infringemenS of any legal or fundamenta! right. The di'sputes rassed herein this petition can be resolved under the other provisions that 13 the Chhattisgarh Lok Parisar (BedakhaH) Adhiniyam, 1974 or the remedy availabie underthe clyijjurisdiction. (4) Thus, this petitton has no merit ss it invoh/es disputed question of facts, Accordingly, frse %Tit petition is dfsmissec!. However, the petitioner is at ilberty te take recourse to any other altemstive remedy that may be availabie to him under the provisions of !aw. Sd/- sa^hK.A^,ih^i Judge Kam^a ;,.s';i.-E^3ei