SM 1 905.ao.1256.11.gr IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1256 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1657 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1256 OF 2011 Ms. Christy Murlidharan ....Appellant. Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others ....Respondents. WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO. 30019 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 30022 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO. 30019 OF 2011 Mr. Pravin A. Gohil ....Appellant. Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others ....Respondents. WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO. 30026 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 30027 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO. 30026 OF 2011 Smt. Shantidevi Jawahar Singh ....Appellant. Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others ....Respondents. WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO. 30033 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 30034 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO. 30033 OF 2011 Mr. Omprakash S. Israni ....Appellant. SM 2 905.ao.1256.11.gr Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others ....Respondents. WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO. 30036 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 30040 OF 2011 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO. 30036 OF 2011 Mr. Arvind I. Patangia ....Appellant. Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others ....Respondents. ____________ Mr. P. S. Dani i/b Ganesh & Co. for the Appellants. Ms. K. K. Soraan for the Respondent-BMC. CORAM: R. M. BORDE, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 17, 2011. P.C.: It is informed that in 11 other matters presented by the persons who are similarly situate as that of the appellants, the Trial Court has granted ad-interim protection during the pendency of the Notice of Motion. The appellants are also similarly situate and are occupying the same premises which has been occupied by other 11 persons, in whose favour, the Trial Court has granted ad- interim protection during the pendency of the Notice of Motion. 2. Considering these aspects, I deem it appropriate to direct the respondent-Municipal Corporation not to take any adverse action till the Notice of Motion is heard finally. The Trial Court is directed to decide the pending Notice of Motions in all the matters as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a SM 3 905.ao.1256.11.gr period of 12 weeks from the date of the receipt of the writ. The Municipal Corporation shall not taken any adverse action during the pendency and disposal of the Notice of Motion by the Trial Court. 3. All the Appeals from Order stand disposed of. Municipal Corporation is permitted to file written statement, say, documents etc. (R. M. BORDE, J.)