IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.16119 of 2011 Date of Decision.01.09.2011 Chand Kaur wife of late Shri Pritam Singh, resident of village Dudhar, Tehsil and District Patiala .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab through the Secretary, Home Department, Punjab, Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will be satisfied if the complaint (Annexure P-1), which has been issued on behalf of the petitioner, is considered by respondent No.3 within a particular time. 2. The representation shall be decided by respondent No.3 if the same is represented again along with copy of this order within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 3. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE September 01, 2011 Pankaj*