IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.28710 of 2009 RAJU RAJAK, s/o Muneshwar Rajak,resident of Mohalla-Kandu Ram Ki Garhi,Ward No.11,P.S.- Daud Nagar,District-Aurangabad at present residing at Mohalla-Harding Road,Quarter No.27,P.S.-Secretariat Thana,District-Patna. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. Kanchan Kumari,D/o Ram Pukar Rajak, w/o Raju Rajak,resident of Mohalla- Lohanipur,Upadhayay Lane,P.S.-Kadamkuan, District-Patna. ----------- 05/ 22-02-2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is a case of differences in between the wife and husband. Complainant is interested for some ornaments and cash of rupees one lac in the name given at the time of marriage, which is denied. For such matrimonial differences according to the learned counsel for the petitioner refusal of anticipatory bail is not justified. I agree with the learned counsel. In the discussed facts and circumstances, this petition for anticipatory bail is allowed. In case of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in Complaint Case No.2548 ©/2008, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. AH/ ( Mandhata Singh, J. )