* HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMIflEE, DHARWAD BEFORE. THE LOR ADPLPT IN TI4E HIGH COURT CF KA1 NATAKA AT DFLRWAD DATEL) THIS THE ZY)\D DAY OF FEBRUARY 2011 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: HONTILE MR. JUSTICE A.NVENUGOPALA GOWDA AND SRIVGBHAT. MEMBER MISCETILANEOFIRSJ\PPEALj, T OJ512Qj2007jV LOK ADALAT NOM6/20 11 BETWEEN: SHRLJAflAPPA SUBRAY HARIKANT, GED31 YE4RS URPLIE R DO T SC PPI\ TE ‘JR SC ‘ ORE ND ELECTRIC’ U’ V ‘V GOP ( \‘ A OR AGHANASHINI, RUMTA, DIST; USCAR KANNADA, APPELLANT (BY SRI. SACHIN S. MAO AOUM AOV,; AND: SHR JL- ‘ D-U -‘L ALl SAB SDL\ IAR SAB, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, KAGAL, TO: KUNITA — 581343. DIST: UTTAR KANNADA. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, * TfSjJTiT’D TMfl4 TIVSZT TP9ISV ‘‘ rn MBA rrv ,MTTpM GIB HIGH SCHOOL ROAD. KUMT435S 1343. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. LAXMAN 15 kIANTMflflT. 4DM FOR MU) MRA RUED U/S 173(1) OF I.4V ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND - 4L FO’E_, 5’Jj EnE 43 -‘E /E”BE 43 -— - C q aM P’;TIToN UCR UT S EMOTLS END SEEKING 43 HANCES EN 9 OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMiNG ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT AFTER BEING REFERRED VID1.f ORDER hATED 02M2.DOii, THE FOLLOWING CONCiLIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATiON ORDER Both sides are present. After negotiation, t.he parties have arrived at a settlement. A joint memo is filed in this reard. 2. The second respondent snbmits that, he is agreeable to pay 25.OOO/— in Iumpsom, ia. over and above rhe amount awarded by the MACT, being the full and final settlement of the claim of the appellant. 3. Both the arties have sirn.ed the consent memo. 4. The second respondent shall deposit the agreed amount before the MACT, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this: order, In case of deihult, the amount shall, carty interest at the rate of 9% pm, ic,, after exiv of six \‘Cflks period. 5. Upon de.posit, the entire amount be. released in- favour the appellant! c.laimann. Q% Is L, JUGGE