FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.15 OF 2010 Surendra Kulkarni Versus D.S.Kulkarni and Anr. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court s orders : ’ or directions and Registrar s’ : Court s or Judge s orders ’ ’ orders : _____________________________________________________________________________________ Mr.N.V.Vechalekar i/b.N.V.Vechalekar & Co. for petitioner Mr.D.R.More, APP Mr.Shirsagar for respondent No.1. CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 27th JANUARY, 2010. PC :- 1. Heard. 2. The order of the trial court refuses the request of the petitioner accused to cross examine the witness of the respondent company. The order passed is no cross . “ ” That order has been passed on account of the fact that the petitioner did not remain present nor the Advocate representing it. 3. After this matter is argued for some time, both sides have no objection, if this Court gives one final opportunity to the petitioner accused to remain present for cross examining the witness of the respondents original complainant. Accordingly, parties shall attend the trial court on 10th February 2010 at 10.30 a.m., and proceed to cross examine the witness. If there is any default committed by the petitioner accused, then, the Court can proceed on the basis that the petitioner does not wish to cross examine the witness. Petition disposed of in these terms. (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.)