IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.32682 of 2010 BASANT SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 03. 17.01.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. First Information Report is to the effect that informant’s son was taken by this petitioner along with three others for market, but he did not return rather his dead body recovered. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that one Manjoo Devi having similar allegation that her name was not there in Sanha (Information) to the police about naming co- accused Rahul and Nitesh only, has been allowed anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. No.11531 of 2010 by a bench of this Court, is differentiated by learned counsel for the informant that petitioner’s name has appeared in confession made by co-accused Manoj Kumar Singh as he was also one of the accused keeping watch and care of the kidnapped boy is said inadmissible, but it is admitted to the parties that investigation is pending against this petitioner. Accordingly ,till submission of the charge sheet, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran, Chapra in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No.104 of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the 2 Code of Criminal Procedure. Vikash (Mandhata Singh, J.)