CMPMO No. 87 of 2011. 24.6. 2011 Present: Mr. Neeraj Maniktala, Advocate, for the petitioner. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order passed by the learned Additional District Judge (I), Kangra at Dharamshala in an application filed by the petitioner under Order 47, Rule 1 CPC for the review of judgment and decree passed in HMA petition No. 25-P/05 dated 26.12.2007. A bare perusal of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure shows that the revision petition is maintainable against such an order passed by the learned trial Court. The petitioner seeks to invoke the extra ordinary powers of the Court in this case by filing the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution can be invoked, in case there is no specific provision for challenging the order and when there is specific provision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure to file the revision petition against the order passed by the learned trial Court, therefore, the present petition is not maintainable. Prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner to convert the present petition into the revision petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is rejected. The petitioner is at liberty to file the revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the time taken to pursue this petition shall be liable to be condoned in computing the period for limitation. The documents be returned to the petitioner against proper receipt. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Copy dasti. 24th June, 2011. (V. K. Ahuja) (jai) Judge