IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Dated: Nainital: the 21st day of October, 2010 1st Bail application No. 928 of 2010 Order on the bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Ankur Sharma … Applicant Vs State of Uttarakhand … Opposite Party --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arising out of Case Crime No. 84 of 2010 Under Sections 392, 379, 411, 420 of I.P.C. Police Station Jhabreda District Haridwar By the court Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Heard Sri Rajendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Amit Bhatt, learned Addl. G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the accused/applicant has submitted that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. Even, the theft of the motorcycle was committed on 10.06.2010 and the F.I.R. of the same was lodged on 15.06.2010 without explaining the sufficient cause of delay. He further submitted that the said motorcycle was recovered on 18.07.2010 from Meerut. He has also argued that the recovery of motorcycle was not shown from the possession of the applicant and he has been falsely implicated in the case. He also submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the papers available on record and without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer, J.) 21.10.2010 ASWAL