IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Writ Petition No. 886 of 2008 With Stay Application No. 7465 / 2008 Ali Ahmad & others. …… Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ……. Respondents None for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. for respondent nos.1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J. None for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A. for respondent nos.1 & 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Mr. Amit Bhatt, the learned Addl. G.A. submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner, has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation in the case have submitted the chargesheet against the petitioners before the court concerned. This fact has been indicated in para 2 of the counter affidavit filed by the State. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. The stay application stands disposed of accordinly. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 05.12.2008 V.K.