1 ABA 519.11.sxw JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 519 OF 2011 Maya Rajaram Kadam. ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent. Mr. Ganesh Gole for the Applicant. Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for the State. CORAM : A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED : 17th JUNE 2011. P.C. :- Heard. 2. Investigating Officer is absent. However, after going through the bail application and the annexures thereto, I do not find it necessary to adjourn the matter, merely because the Investigating Officer is absent. 3. If the averments in the FIR are taken at face value, there exists a prima-facie case against the Applicant. However, it is clear that the entire amount of Rs.25,000/-, said to have been gained by committing the alleged offence, has been recovered from the co-accused. The documents of the first informant have also been recovered from the co-accused. This is clear 2 ABA 519.11.sxw from the copy of the remand application dated 14.3.2011, annexed to the bail application. 4. The Applicant is a member of the police force. She is a woman. Since the property of the first informant has already been recovered from the co-accused and has been returned to the first informant, I think it fit to grant the anticipatory bail to the Applicant. 5. In the event of her arrest, the Applicant be released on bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in like amount, on the condition to attend the concerned Police Station and make herself available for investigation/interrogation, as and when required by the Investigating Officer. (A.M. THIPSAY,J.)