IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 614 of 2006 (M/B) Rakesh Virmani S/o Late Sri Dittu Ram, R/o 816 Avas Vikas Colony, Virbhadra Road, Rishikesh, P.S. Rishikesh, District Dehradun. …….. Petitioners Versus 1. State of Uttaranchal through SSP, Dehradun, District Dehradun. 2. SHO, P.S. Rishikesh, District Dehradun. 3. W.N. Sangri, R/o Opposite Ashoka Hotel, Rishikesh, P.S. Rishikesh, District Dehradun. ………. Respondents Sri Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri H.C.Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral) Sri Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri H.C.Pande, Addl. Government Advocate for respondents 1 and 2. None for respondent no. 3. 2. Sri Pande, the learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the writ petition filed by the petitioner Rakesh Virmani seeking quashing of the First Information Report and the case registered against him now has become infructuous as the police after completion of the investigation has filed charge-sheet against the petitioner before the concerning Court. 3. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Consequently, CLMA No. 6355 of 2006 also stands dismissed as infructuous. (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.) 27.06.2006 27.06.2006 A