IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13737 of 2005 MRITYUNJAY KUMAR VERMA SON OF LATE SHYAM SUNDAR PRASAD, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE & P.O. BASBITTI, P.S. & DISTRICT SUPAUL. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 2. THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (EDUCATION) GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 3. THE DIRECTOR-CUM-JOINT COMMISSIONER, DIRECTORATE OF GENERAL PROVIDENT FUND, PANT BHAWAN, BIHAR AT PATNA. 4. THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 5.THE SPECIAL DIRECTOR (MINORITY) GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. 6. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PATNA 7. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, PATNA. 8. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, PATNA. 9. THE MANAGING COMMITTEE THROUGH ITS SECRETARY NAMELY MR. RAM AVTAR VATSAYAN, GIRLS MIDDLE SCHOOL, BORING ROAD, P.S. SRI KRISHNAPURI DISTRICT – PATNA. 10. THE SECRETARY NAMELY MR. RAM AVATAR VATSAYAN , THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF GIRLS MIDDLE SCHOOL, BORING ROAD, P.S. SRI KRISHNAPURI, DISTRICT PATNA. 11. THE INCHARGE HEAD MISTRESS, GIRLS MIDDLE SCHOOL, BORING ROAD, P.S. KRISHNAPURI, DISTRICT PATNA. 12. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR AT PATNA. ----------- 05. 03.11.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State as also the Accountant General. Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the money sent by the State Government to the respondent nos. 9 and 10 which was 2 defalcated and for which after having a vigilance enquiry other enquiries were lodged against the Secretary of the Managing Committee (respondent no. 10). It is submitted that the money for payment of salary to the petitioner has not been defalcated. The money has not been received which was sent by the State Government for the material time. Besides the above, there are certain other claims which have been highlighted in the writ application. In the above circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for expeditious disposal of the pending claims, petitioner proposes to file a representation before the respondent no. 4. In view of the above, in case such representation stating details of unpaid claims is filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks along with the certified copy of the present order as also the copy of the relevant documents, if any, in support of the claim, the above respondent shall consider the claims of the petitioner by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months on receipt of such representation after giving an opportunity for hearing to the petitioner as also the concerned respondents so that the grievances of the 3 petitioner could be settled without delay and the admitted dues could also be paid along with interest permissible under the rules. The writ application stands disposed of with the above observations/directions. Jagdish/ ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J.)