IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2011 / 21ST POUSHA 1932 WP(C).No. 37020 of 2010(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MOHAN KURIAKOSE, S/O. KURIAKOSE, CHALAPPURAM HOUSE, ALAPPAT CROSS ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 016. BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN SRI.K.T.THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. NEDUMBASSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KARIYAD, MEKKAD.P.O, PIN - 683 589, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SECRETARY, NEDUMBASSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KARIYAD, MEKKAD.P.O, PIN - 683 589. ADV. SRI.GEORGE SEBASTIAN FOR R1 & R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: jma C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) 37020 OF 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of January, 2011 J U D G M E N T The grievance of the petitioner pertains to the non consideration of Ext.P2 application dated 1.8.2009 submitted before the first respondent for the purpose of getting permission for erecting an advertisement hoarding in his property. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The learned Standing Counsel submitted that Ext.P2 application would be considered in accordance with law. Therefore, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions raised in this writ petition, it is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider Ext.P2 application submitted by the petitioner for the aforesaid purpose in accordance with law expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of 3 weeks from today. Sd/- C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE jma //true copy// P.A to Judge