IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION No. 5779 of 2008 Between: P. Paramasivappa S/o. Changalarayappa R/o. Pathikonda Village & Post, Gangavaram Mandal, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary (Land Acquisition), Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector, Chittoor District, Chittoor. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madanapalli Division, Chittoor District. 4 The Tahsildar/Mandal Revenue Officer, Gangavaram Mandal, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act vide proceedings No.G1/5327/2007 dated 09.05.2007 as well as declaration issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act vide proceedings No.G1/5327/2007 dated 1.3.2008 published on 4.3.2008 in respect of the petitioner's land admeasuring Ac.2.18 cents situate in Survey No. 300/3 of Gandrajupalle Village, Gangavaram Mandal, Chittoor District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently stay all further proceedings including dispossession of the petitioner from the agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 2.18 cents situate in Survey No.300/3 of Ganrajupalle Village, Gangavaram Mandal, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.VINOD.K.REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.5779 of 2008 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter, dated 26.06.2009, to the Registry stating that he has instructions from the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. _____________ N.V.RAMANA,J 29.06.2009 Note: Furnish CC by tomorrow B/o v v