IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.W.P.No.1622 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:September 17, 2010 Jarnail Singh .....Petitioner v. The State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.R.K.Bagga, Advocate for the petitioner. ..... RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 3(1)(c) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988, is for issuance of direction to the respondent no.2 to consider and decide the case of petitioner for grant of agricultural parole, pending in his office. Heard. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that application was already moved before respondent no.3, i.e., Superintendent, Central Jail, Ambala, who dispatched the same to the office of respondent no.4, i.e., District Magistrate, Kurukshetra, on 5.7.2010, vide dispatch nos.7307-08. Further contends that respondent no.4 has also sent the same to the office of respondent nos.2 and 3 and however, the same is still pending with respondent no.2. Hence, in view of these facts and as per request, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider and decide the application of the petitioner, already stated to have been moved before respondent no.3, as per law, Rules and Instructions on the point, within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 17.9.2010 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge