@ cémQ/A‘ (D IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. H93. OF 2011 PETITIONER / Jair‘am Singh Sidar S/o Ifwar Singh Sidar‘,.aged about 44 years, Posf of Head Mas’rer', Working ‘ as Govf.‘ Primary School Bandhapar‘a, Block Podi- Upr'oda, Dis1'1'. Kor‘bo (CG) VERSUS RESPONDENTS / 1. Sfafe of Chhah‘isgar‘h, Through Secretary, Tribal Welfare Deparfmenf, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (6.6.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Raipur, DisiT. Depar‘rmen’r, Raipur (CG) Assisfam Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Depar‘rmen’r, Korba, Dis‘r‘l. Korba (CG) Join‘r DirecTor, Treasury, accoum‘s, pension, Bilaspur Disfricf Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Block Educai’ion Officer Podi— Uproda, Disf‘l'. Korba (CG) C? WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA XI-HC 78 3.3.: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRITINKER DIWAKER 03.08.201 1 Shri Amit Kumar, commel for the petitioner. Shn' N.Naha Roy, P.L. for the State. Counsel for the petitior entitled to benefit of two ad‘ve having passed B.T.I. examinz appointment at his own cos involved in the present petitio same has been nnally decided the case of Asha Saxena V (III)MPJR (SC) 59. that this Court has also taken a It is further submitted similar View in its order dated 6.2.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No, 6257/2008. Counsel for the Ler submits that the petitioner is Lnce increments on account of he ition in the year 1993 before his t. It is submitted that the issue n is no longer res integra and the by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in s. State of NLP. as 01's. 2009 petitioners further submits that the order dated 29.4.2019 passed in Writ‘Appeal NO. 124/2009, wherein relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case ofAsha 3a WW, gnaw, mg? na (supra) and the order passed. by this Court in another W t Appeal No. 87/2009, directions have been issued for conside advance increments as per the State of Madhya Prade pleaded in the petih‘on. Counsel for the State s bmits that case of the petitioner would also be considered on e same lines. tion of the case for grant of two lar dated 21.9.1974 issued by h. after verincation of the facts S e c .u ummmwVCé) L‘Q 1N} \q W 200 mam I wmm m m (watt) .._‘_._T mm 311%“ WW nwsh‘ ‘13 Fgta‘r fawn % aim 311%?! XI-HC 78 @ N9..N%Lu\ .11“.v1 200 WWW WWW 3a 31mm, Emma, W 11mmWm admww$($d§n§) Hamnv&aa m In View of above, the mfwfra wwsff 13f FM Irma]? %3imanéw petition is disposed of with a dimction to the respondent authorin'es to decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments as per circular dated 21.9.1974 i:;sued by the State of Madhya Pradesh after veri§cation of the facts pleaded in the petition within a period of four months horn today. It is made clear that this CouIT. has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide: the same strictly in accordance With law. Sd/v- Pritinker Diwaker Judge s a