IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 3230 of 2006 Between: Nannam Padmavathi, S/o. Paparao, R/o. Vipparla Village, Rompicherla Mandal, Guntur District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The District Collector, Guntur, Guntur District. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narasaraopet, Guntur District. 3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rompicherla, Rompicherla Mandal, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.T.V.V.KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue any writ or direction, more particularly Writ of Mandamus declaring the Endowments R.C.No.1780/04-B dt. 3.3.2005 issued by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for selection of Fair Price shop dealership vacancy, which is reserved for S.C. in Vipperla Village Rompicherla Mandal, Guntur District, taking consideration of petitioner’s date of Birth as 04.04.1987.” At the hearing, Sri S.V.Ramana, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration and therefore, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.4007 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous. ___________________________ (C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J) 4th June, 2008 LUR