f/ ' fh [tysyss; ~w;s'' ^' /\> v\ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR D.B.: Hon^ble ShrUusticeSunil Kumar Sinha and Hon'bte ShriJustice Prashant Kumar Mishra WritAppealNo.211 of 2011 Appellants versus Respondents N.D.Suryavanshi, S/o Late Shri K.R.Suryavanshi, aged about 45 years, resident of Devi Nagar, Maharana Pratap Chowk,- Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG) (Wrongly mentioned in order impugned as A.D.Suryavanshi) T.R.Anchal, S/o Late Shri B.R.Anchal, aged about 44 years, resident of Kumharpara, Jarhabhata, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG) State of Chhattisgarh, through : Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur(CG) The Secretary, Water Resource Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralay, Raipur (CG) Chief Engineer, Water Resource Department, Shihava Bhawan, Raipur (CG) The Janpad Panchayat, through: Chief Executive Offlcer, Masturi, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG) Present: Shri Sandeep Dubey, counsel for the appellants. Shri Sumesh Bajaj.Government Advocate for the State/respondents No.1 to3. WritApDeal underSection 2(1) ofthe Chhattisaarh Hiah Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act ORALORDER ('Passedon5thMay,2011) Per Sunil KumarSinha, J.: Heard. ^A '^ i .,v s ..^f 2. Shri Sandeep Dubey, learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that even after passing of the order dated 26-4- 2011 (Annexure A-2) by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (S.)No.2162/2011 (impugned inthiswrit appeal), respondent No.3 is not taking joining of the petitioners/appellants. With the above statement, learned counsel takes us to the order of repatriation dated 3-12-2010 (Annexure P-1 in the writ petition) as also to the statement made by the Deputy Advocate General recorded in paragraph 5 of the order dated 26-4-2011. With the above reference, learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw this writ appeal with liberty to file a representation before the concerned authority for taking of the joining of the appellants in view of the above facts situation. 3. Permission granted. 4. Accordingly, the writ appeal is disposed of aswithdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour ofthe appeilants. Sd//- Sd/- Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge pra'sbantKumar Judge Mtehra Gopal