IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.2359 of 2009 HARENDRA CHANDRA DUTTA, S/O LATE JAGAT NARAIN DUTTA, R/O SECTOR-7, BLOCK-4, QTR.NO.9, MIG, BAHADURPUR HOUSING COLONY, BHOOT NATH ROAD IN THE DISTRICT OF PATNA. …………PETITIONER. Versus 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR. 2.SRI K.K. PATHAK, SON OF (PRESENTLY NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER). 3.SRI KAMESHWAR PRASAD SINHA, SON OF (PRESENTLY NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER). EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD, PATNA PRAMANDAL NO.3, BAHADURPUR, PATNA IN THE DISTRICT OF PATNA. …………OPPOSITE PARTIES. ----------- 02/ 09.03.2011 Having heard Mr. Dinu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Kishore Singh, learned counsel for the Bihar State Housing Board, this Court is of the considered opinion that the opposite parties have fully complied with the order of this Court in letter and spirit. If the petitioner has got any further grievance as with regard to his liability as indicated in the order of the authority, the remedy for him also has been provided in that very order where violation has been alleged in this contempt application. As a matter of fact this Court while disposing of the writ petition of the petitioner had made it clear that any 2 further dispute on the part of the petitioner on the issue of determination of final price in terms of arbitration clause of agreement could be agitated only in an arbitration proceeding. Be that it may, that this Court is fully satisfied that since the order as per earlier direction has been passed by the authority of the Housing Board which has also been communicated to the petitioner nothing remains for him to complain at least on the front of this contempt petition. With the aforementioned observation this contempt application is disposed of. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha,J)