IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 456 OF 2008 BHOM ADCON EDUCATION SOCIETY THROUGH RAYU D. NAIK ... Petitioner Versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF GOA AND ANR., ... Respondents Shri P. Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Winnie Coutinho, Government Advocate for Respondent No. 1. Shri S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Shri P. Lotlikar, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Coram:- N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:- 20th March, 2009 P.C.:- Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the parties submit that the matter was elaborately argued before the Director of Education but the Director of Education has not given any reasons in support of the order. In the absence of reasons having been given, and, by consent of parties the impugned Order is hereby set aside and the Director of Education is hereby required to dispose off the Petitioner's application for suspension, by a reasoned order. The Director of Education would be at liberty, if he so desires, to rehear the parties. A reasoned order be passed within a period of six weeks. Petition disposed off on the above terms. N. A. BRITTO, J. RD.