IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs : 1437, 1438 & 1468 of 2001 Criminal Appeal under Section _______ against the Judgement dated ______ in CC NO : 17 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the Spcial Court Under A.P.C.S. Act, Vijayawada Criminal Appeal No.1437 of 2001: Between: Pitchika Mallikarjunarao S/o. Suryarao Handloom Weavers Co-opeartive Production and Sales Biccavole Mandal. ..... APPELLANT (Accused) AND State of A.P., rep.by P.P High Court of A.P., Hyd. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant :MR.C.PRAVEEN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO : 1438 of 2001 Between: 1 Donthamasetty Veera Maheswara Rao S/o. Mallikharjunudu Handloom Weavers Society, Pandalapaka, Biccavole Mandal, Krishna Dist 2 Batta Malleswara Rao S/o. Mallikharjuna Rao, Handloom Weavers Society, Pandalapaka Biccavole Mandal Krishna Dist ..... APPELLANTS (Accused) AND Sub-Inspector of Police, Biccavole Police Station, State of A.P, rep.by its P.P. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:MR.S.SRINIVAS REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO : 1468 of 2001 Between: 1 Pitchika Satyanrayana S/o. Mallikarjunudu Handloom Weavers Co-op Production and sales society Pandalapaka, Biccavole Mandal. 2 Madem Veeraraju s/o. Appalaswamy Handloom Weavers Co-op Production and Sales Society Pandalapaka, Biccavole Mandal. ..... APPELLANTS (Accused) AND The State of A.P., rep.by P.P. High Court of A.P., Hyd. .....RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:MR.G.V.R.CHOUDARY Counsel for the Respondent No.: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos.1437, 1438 AND 1468 OF 2001 COMMON JUDGMENT: Heard both sides. These appeals are directed against the Judgment dated 27.08.2001 in C.C.No.17 of 1999 on the file of the Special Court Under Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, Vijayawada, whereunder and whereby the appellants were found guilty for the offence punishable under Section 409 IPC read with Section 79(F) of Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act. The orders were passed by the Special Court in the capacity as a Judicial First Class Magistrate. Therefore, appeal lies to the concerned Sessions division. Therefore, the appeals have to be presented in the appropriate Court. Hence, return for presentation in the appropriate Court. Accordingly, the appeals are disposed of, however, the sentence of punishment passed against the appellants is suspended for a period of one month from today to enable them to file the same before the concerned Sessions division. _______________ K.C. BHANU, J 02.09.2009 MD