IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No.6807 of 2010 MD.MAHTAB KHAN, son of Md. Sarwar Khan, resident of village- Bhagalpur, P.S. Piro, District- Bhojpur. ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF BIHAR ...OP ----------- 2/ 26.02.2010 Heard Mr. Baxi S. R. P. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ansarul Haque, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under sections 408, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 466/34 of the Indian Penal Code as also under section 3(i),( (ii) and (vii) ) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report as an accused and even according to the prosecution case no case under section 3(i),( (ii) and (vii) ) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, is made out in the present case. It is also submitted that according to the prosecution case main allegation of embezzlement of certain money advanced to the informant is against co-accused Gauri Shanker Singh and the Bank Manager. According to him the petitioner was the bonafide supplier of Pumping Set. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail but he has not been able to dispute the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner. Be that as it may, in the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing - 2 - bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhjopur at Ara, in connection with Piro P.S. case no. 200 of 2007. JA/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)