wg [9) i%4?/o§ BEFORE THE NLP. STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, JABALPUR 0A. N0@ OF 99 mL‘ B: HON’BLE SHRI MANINDRA MO HAN SHRIVASTAVA J. 2.01 .2010 When the matter was called 0Lt for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner and the matter was passei over. Even in the second round none appears for the petitioner. Shri Ajit Singh, P.L. for the respondents No.1 & 2/State. None for respondents No.3 to 8. Grievance of the petitioner, as. stated out in the petition, that the -r petitioner has been superseded anc respondents No.3 to 8, juniors to him, have been promoted. In the return filed, it has been stated that in the Departmental Promotion Committee heid in circular on 10.08.1999, 17 Officers along with the petitioner were considered nd found suitable for promotion to the post of Finance and Accounts S Nice (Junior Grade) by order dated 02.09.2000 w.e.f. 11.12.1998. A cop of the order dated 02.09.2000 has been annexed with the return as nexure R.1. According to the respondents No.1 & 2, the cause of ction does not survive in view of the order of promotion given to the petitio er w.e.f. 11.12.1998. ln view of the above, the inst nt petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Liberty is, however, iven to the petitioner to revive, if grievance wholly or in part still subsi A copy of this order be sent to he petitioner. 3 [mew S 1 , n s .