IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.20941 of 2009 AMARDEEP YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 06.08.2009 Heard counsel for the parties. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking bail in a case instituted under diverse sections including section 307 of IPC. Allegation as per the FIR is that altogether 13 named accused persons including the petitioner came to the place of occurrence and started firing indiscriminately. In the occurrence, the informant and his cousin are said to have received injuries. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the injuries sustained by them have been found to have been caused by hard and blunt substance. So far as the injury sustained by Suresh Mandal (cousin of the informant) is concerned, the same is/was simple in nature. Learned counsel, referring to paragraphs 11 to 18 of the case diary, states that looking to the injury report the witnesses had made departure from what the informant had initially alleged in the FIR. Learned counsel further submits that several other accused persons against whom there is allegation of firing, have been released on bail by the learned court below. Learned APP looking to the statement (para 16) of the injured Suresh Mandal states before this Court that there - 2 - appears to be a departure from what has been initially alleged in the FIR. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner abovenamed be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM, Naugachiya in connection with Naugachiya (Parbatta) P.S.Case No. 300/07 subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be his own/close family member. hr ( Kishore K. Mandal )