IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 9TH OCTOBER 2007 / 17TH ASWINA 1929 WP(C).No. 29437 of 2007(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------ 1. M.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, S/O MANOHARAN PILLAI, 'MATHALAM', MARUTHWAMLA P.O., VITHURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK EMPLOYEES CONGRESS, REG NO.412/95, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY NARAYANAN. BY ADV. SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. THE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE PRESIDENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK. 4. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV.SRI.V.G.ARUN SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR FOR R1 TO R3 GOVT. PLEADER SMT.ANU SIVARAMAN FOR R4 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.M.JOSEPH, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(c).No. 29437 OF 2007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 9th day of October , 2007 JUDGMENT First petitioner is the senior accountant of the 1st respondent Bank. Second petitioner is the employees union. Ext.P1 is stated to be the transfer norms. Petitioners case is that there is violation of the norms. I heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for respondents 1 to 3. I feel that if the first petitioner or the employees who are members of the second petitioner association has any grievance arising out of transfer, it is for them to approach the authority under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing that if the first petitioner or any other employees of the first respondent Bank approaches the authority under Section 69, the authority under Section 69 will take a decision thereon with full opportunity to the parties as expeditiously as possible. It is certainly open to the first petitioner or any other employee to highlight the complaint of violation of Ext.P1 norms before the authority. (K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE) sv