(1) C.A. 13737.2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13737 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2562 OF 2010 Shashikant Narayanrao Chidrawar .. Applicant VERSUS Sudhir S/o Sudhakar Deshpande and anr. .. Respondents Mr. P.G. Godhamgaonkar, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. Mukul Kulkarni, Advocate for the respondent no.1 None present for the respondent no.2 ... CORAM : V.R. KINGAONKAR, J. DATED : 20TH OCTOBER, 2010 ORAL ORDER:- 1. Heard learned Advocates for the parties. 2. The Review Application is filed by the original defendant no.1. In the Writ Petition no. 2562 of 2010 the review petitioner i.e. the original defendant no.1-Shashikant Narayanrao Chidrawar was not present at all. His absence was marked while passing the order which is sought to be reviewed. (2) C.A. 13737.2010 3. This Court disposed of the Writ Petition on concession and by consent of the Advocate of the original petitioner and the respondent no.2 i.e. original defendant no.2. It appears that the original defendant no. 1 and 2 i.e. the present review petitioner and the respondent no.2 in the Writ Petition had filed a joint written statement and their contentions were the same in regard to the area of the land in question. 4. The fact situation which boils down is that review petitioner was absent though served and as such he was ex-parte and hence, there was no question to give opportunity of hearing to him. This being the fact situation, the order passed by consent of the remaining contesting parties cannot be challenged by him by filing the review Application. Review Application dismissed. Sd/- [V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.] arp