IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 1577 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 17/10/2008 in WP NO : 20166 OF 2008 on the file of the High Court.) Between: N. Venkata Achutarama Narasimha Raju S/o. Late Venkat Raju R/o. D.No. 45-52/2, Abidnagar, Akkayyapalem Visakhapatnam. ..... APPELLANT AND 1 State Government Gazetted Officers Coop. House Building Society, D.No. 54-11-54, Plot No. 10, Isukathota , Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam , Rep. by its Secretary, N. Venu Gopala Rao 2 The Dy. Registrar of Cooperative Societies NGO Home, Near Diamond Park, Visakhapatnam. .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:MR.V.V.N.NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondents.: GP FOR COOPERATION SMT.B.VIJAYALAKSHMI The Court made the following : . THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 1577 of 2008 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy) This writ appeal is filed against the order, dated 17.10.2008 in WP No.20166 of 2008, whereby the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition filed against the order, dated 30.8.2008 in I.A.No.95 of 2008 in E.O.P No.2 of 2008. Both the learned counsel agreed that the writ appeal may be disposed of at the admission stage. We have heard Sri V.V.N. Narayana Rao, learned Counsel for the appellant and Smt. B. Vijayalakshmi, learned Counsel for the 1st respondent. The appellant filed election petition bearing No.E.O.P No.2 of 2008 before the A.P. Co-operative Tribunal, Visakhapatnam (for short ‘the Tribunal’) questioning the election to the managing committee of the 1st respondent-society. In the said election petition, the appellant filed I.A.No.95 of 2008 for interim injunction restraining the society and its general body from taking up policy decisions till the disposal of the EOP or till further orders of the Tribunal. The said application was allowed by the Tribunal, which order was assailed in W.P.No.20166 of 2008 by the 1st respondent. The learned Single Judge having heard the learned Counsel for the parties held that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to pass the order impugned in the writ petition in the absence of any specific power conferred on it. The learned Single Judge also found fault with the order passed by the Tribunal in restraining the society and the general body from taking policy decisions because the scope of the election petition was confined only to the election of the managing committee. We have carefully considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. The petitions filed questioning the election of the Managing Committee is pending before the tribunal. Admittedly, there is no provision under the A.P. Co-op Societies Act 1964 which vested the tribunal with the power to pass an interim order to restrain the society or the elected Managing Committee from exercising their powers. Therefore, in our view, the learned Single Judge has not committed any error in giving finding that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to pass the order impugned in the writ petition. The writ appeal is hence liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. However, the Tribunal is directed to dispose of E.O.P.No.2 of 2008 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, after notice to the appellant and the 1st respondent. _________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari _____________________________ Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy Dated: 19.1.2009 Nn. THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI & THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 1577 of 2008 (Judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy) 19.1.2009