IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.13224 of 2010 1. RAKESH CHANDRA BARNWAL S/O LATE GULAB CHAND PRASAD R/O VILLAGE, P.O. & P.S.- RAXAUL, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN, AT PRESENT R/O 67, NARMADA APARTMENT, EXHIBITION ROAD, P.S. GANDHI MAIDAN, DISTT.- PATNA Versus 1. MOSTT. DULARI BARNWAL W/O LATE PRABHAS CHANDRA BARNWAL R/O MAIN ROAD, RAXAUL, P.S.- RAXAUL, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN - 845305 (BIHAR) 2. PANKAJ BARNWAL S/O LATE PRABHASH CHANDRA BARNWAL R/O MAIN ROAD, RAXAUL, P.S.- RAXAUL, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN- 845305 (BIHAR) 3. SMT. RUCHI BARNWAL D/O LATE PRABHAS CHANDRA BARNWAL R/O - C/O- SRI BINDESHWARI PRASAD BARNWAL, FLAT NO. G-4, APRAJITA APARTMENT, KHAJPURA, RAJA BAZAR, DISTT.- PATNA (BIHAR) 4. SMT. SWATI BARNWAL D/O LATE PRABHAS CHANDRA BARNWAL, W/O MR. ANUPAM BARNWAL (OWNER OF COLD STORAGE), S/O LATE JAG NARAYAN BARNWAL R/O VILLAGE & P.O.- TEGHRA, DISTT.- BEGUSARAI (BIHAR) 5. SMT. DEEPIKA BARNWAL D/O LATE PRABHAS CHANDRA BARNWAL, W/O MR. VIKASH KUMAR R/O C/P ARJUN PRASAD BARNWAL, MAIN ROAD, P.O. SARAIYA, DISTT.- GIRIDIH (JHARKHAND) 6. DINESH CHANDRA BARNWAL S/O LATE GULAB CHAND PRASAD R/O VILLAGE, P.O. & P.S.- RAXAUL, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN 7. SUBHASH CHANDRA PRASAD S/O LATE GULAB CHAND PRASAD R/O VILLAGE, P.O. & P.S.- RAXAUL, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN (BIHAR) ----------- 4. 03.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for the respondent nos. 2 and 7. The Court purposely refrains from taking note of the facts of the case except to the extent necessary for the purpose of the present order so as not to prejudice the case of either party. On the own showing of the petitioner he has filed an application before the Court below on 2 1.6.2010 seeking permission for disposal of certain properties pending disposal of his Misc. Case No. 15 of 2008. Rejoinder has also been filed on behalf of the concerned defendant. When a Court of competent jurisdiction is in seisin of the matter and is yet to pass appropriate orders, this Court in exercise of supervisory powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India cannot usurp that jurisdiction. The only appropriate order to be passed is for a direction to dispose off the petitioner’s application in accordance with law, after hearing all concerned, expeditiously preferably within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The writ application stands disposed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)