LPA No. 346 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. 346 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 16, 2011 Dr. D.D. Gaur …Appellant Versus Union of India and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURDEV SINGH Present: Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate for the appellant. 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? M.M. KUMAR, J. 1. The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against order dated 11.11.2010 rendered by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by the writ petition. According to the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, there are errors in the judgment dated 11.11.2010 rendered by the learned Single Judge. The errors go to the roots of the controversy because the stand has been imputed to the appellant which he purported to have taken in earlier round of litigation, which was between Dr. Moti Singh Chauhan and the appellant. The aforesaid litigation has been made the basis to conclude that the stand taken in the aforesaid litigation is binding on the appellant. LPA No. 346 of 2011 (O&M) -2- Accordingly, the appellant, if so advised, may seek review of the order passed by the learned Single Judge. 2. Accordingly, the appeal fails and the same is dismissed. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (GURDEV SINGH) JUDGE August 16, 2011 Atul