HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH Coram : HON’BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, C.J. & HON’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. W P (C) No 2813 of 2008 PETITIONER M/s Meinhardt Singapore Pte Ltd. (A company incorporated under The Companies Act, 1956) with its registered office at A-B, Sector 16, Noida, 201301, Uttar Pradesh. Through its Authorised Representative. Versus ”r RESPONDENTS 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department , of Urban Development, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur C.G. The Municipal Corporation, Raipur, C.G., Through: The Municipal Commissioner, Raipur (C.G.) The Collector, Raipur (C.G.) 4. Water And Power Consultancy services (lndia) Ltd. (WAPCOS) with its registered office at 76-C, Sector - 18, Gurgaon —- 122015 (Haryana) Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Present : -M Shri Jitendra Pali, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Praveen Das learned Deputy GA for respondents No 1 & 3/State Shri Pankai Agrawal teamed counsel for respondent No2 Shri SP. Sahu, learned counsel for respondent No.4/caveator. «we x 1mm 4:12 ‘ “M“ w 65 ORDER (26m June, 2008) The foll‘owing order of the Coun was passed by Rajeev Gupta, c;J. : Shri Pankaj Agrawal, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 submits that as the petitioner’s grievances projected in the writ petition now stand redressed, the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed as infructuous. Sunil Kumar Sinha . “ Judge § 7 Chief Justice \w l padma t