1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Appln. No. 10587 of 2009 In Review Appln. (St.) No. 17545 of 2009 In Second Appeal No. 53 of 2002. Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders 1. Heard Advocate Shri A.S. Bajaj, for the applicants. 2. In order to know what is the point raised in review application, it is said that although at the time of arguments in Second Appeal No.53 of 2002 mainly the question of limitation was raised, but the question regarding credibility of evidence of cadestral surveyor was not raised which needs to be considered. 2 3. It is submitted by Advocate Shri Bajaj that no notice was given to the present applicant and that there were two survey numbers, but only one was measured. 4. This court, while disposing of the said second appeal, has observed that both the lower courts have given concurrent findings of facts regarding credibility of evidence of the cadestral surveyor. 5. Not being satisfied that prima facie there is any reason for interference in the order sought to be reviewed, this civil application stands dismissed. 6. Civil Application disposed of. Date:14/10/2009 (P.R.BORKAR, J.) pnd/ca10587.09