IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 29TH MARCH 2011 / 8TH CHAITHRA 1933 WP(C).No. 3938 of 2011(N) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ RANJINI, AGED 32 YEARS, W/O.CHAKRATH JAYAN, THRIKKUR VILLAGE AND DESOM, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THIRSSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN RESPONDENT(S): --------------------------- THE SECRETARY, NENMANIKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PALIYEKKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 301. BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN SMT.P.R.REENA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29/03/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J. --------------------------------------- W.P(C)No.3938 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated 29th March, 2011 JUDGMENT The petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in considering Ext.P3 application submitted by the petitioner. Earlier, the petitioner was issued with Ext.P1 provisional registration. Ext.P1 would reveal that the application was accepted for provisional registration of SSI unit for the manufacture of cement bricks. As per Ext.P2, the petitioner was issued with a licence dated 2.7.2010 for the purpose of manufacturing hollow bricks with 10HP Electric Motor. Subsequently, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P3 application dated 28.12.2010 seeking correction in the licence. In fact, she seeks grant of licence for producing cement bricks using white cement, sand, quarry powder, oxide in various colours and varnish. However, such a permission was not actually granted as per Ext.P2. It is in the said circumstances that she submitted Ext.P3 for carrying out certain corrections in the licence. After the submission of Ext.P3, the petitioner was served with Ext.P4 notice. She was required to stop the use of polish paint in the hollow bricks and report the same within seven days. The contention of the petitioner is that using of colours and varnish will not in WP(C).No.3938/2011 2 any way cause any health problems and therefore, it was absolutely unnecessary to issue Ext.P4. According to the petitioner, since the respondents have already received Ext.P3, they should consider Ext.P3 in accordance with law and pass orders thereon. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent. The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent, on instructions, submitted that since the respondent has already received Ext.P3, a decision thereon would be taken, in accordance with law, expeditiously. In view of the said submission, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider Ext.P3 expeditiously, in accordance with law. At any rate, this shall be done within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS // true copy // P.S. to Judge