THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH WRIT PETITION No.207 of 2011 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in acting on the complaints given by the petitioner on 20.12.2010 and 05.01.2011 against respondent Nos.4 and 5 as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently to direct respondent Nos.1 to 3 to take appropriate action on the said complaints. It seems that the petitioner and respondent Nos.4 and 5 are members of the same family and that twenty-five years ago, they and other members of the family, partitioned and shared their ancestral properties, leaving the self acquired property of father of the petitioner to him for his livelihood. When father of the petitioner offered his share of property to respondent Nos.4, respondent No.4 refused to purchase the same and therefore, the petitioner purchased the said property, under a registered sale deed dated 10.08.2010. However, when respondent No.4 tried to dispossess the petitioner from the property in question, the petitioner filed O.S.113 of 2010 before the learned Senior Civil Judge, Punganur against respondent Nos.4 and 5 for permanent injunction. I.A.No.532 of 2010 was also filed along with the suit for temporary injunction. The Court below, by order dated 03.12.2010, granted temporary injunction. Since then, respondent Nos.4 and 5, having bore grudge against the petitioner, started giving troubles to the petitioner from doing agricultural operations. Therefore, the petitioner filed complaints dated 20.12.2010 and 05.01.2011 before respondent No.3 and respondent No.1 respectively against respondent Nos.4 and 5. Alleging that no action has been taken so far by respondent Nos.1 to 3 on the said complaints against respondent Nos.4 and 5, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. The learned Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submitted that no such complaint(s) has/have been received by the official respondents so far and therefore, no action could be taken. The submission of the learned Government Pleader is recorded. This Court cannot enquire into such disputed question of fact as to whether the petitioner filed complaints dated 20.12.2010 and 05.01.2011 or not. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to lodge complaint, if not already done on 20.12.2010 and 05.01.2011, to respondent Nos.1 to 3 and respondent Nos.1 to 3 are directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, as and when they receive the complaint of the petitioner either dated 20.12.2010 or 05.01.2011 or of later date. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. __________________ (G.CHANDRAIAH, J) 12th January, 2011 Note: Issue operative portion by wire at party’s costs. (B/o) GHN/AMD