: 1 : vss IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.260 OF 2009 Chandrakant Madhukar Waichal & Ors. ... Applicants V/s. Priya Madhukar Dandekar ... Respondent Mr.N.J. Patil for Applicants Mr.P.M. Arjunwadkar for Respondent CORAM: SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J. DATED: JANUARY 14, 2010 P.C.: 1. The application has been filed challenging the decree passed by the trial Court and confirmed by the appellate Court. 2. The ground on which the decree has been passed is default in payment of rent. It is contended on behalf of the applicant that arrears of rent were sent by money order to their landlady. Apart from this, it is contended by the learned advocate for the applicants that the rent has been deposited in Court with the permission of Court as required u/s 15(3) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The appellate Court has found that the money has not been deposited in accordance with the special provisions. The interest has not been deposited and, therefore, the suit has been decreed and the appellate Court has confirmed the decree. : 2 : 3. In my opinion, there is no error committed by both the Courts below requiring interference by this Court in its revisional jurisdiction. 4. Civil revision application is dismissed. 5. On the application made by the learned advocate for the applicant, the decree will not be executed till 31.5.2010 subject to the usual undertaking being filed by the applicant and all the adult family members within two weeks from today.