1 REVN 213 OF 2010 vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.213 OF 2010 Atul Sureshchandra Jain .. Applicant -versus Rupa Atul Jain .. Respondent. Mr. Akhilesh Upadhayay, for the Applicant. Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent State. Ms. Rupa A Jain, respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED: 10th February, 2011 P.C. 1. This revision is apparently misconceived since the order of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate dated 17.11.2008 was only for to executing his order dated 30th April, 2008, granting a sum of Rs.4,000/- per month to the respondent NO.2 towards maintenance, separate residence and livelihood w.e.f 1st March, 2008. According to applicant, he has provided separate residence to respondent No.2, therefore, impugned order be quashed and set aside. If that be so, it would be for the applicant to approach the competent court to have order dated 30th April, 2008 altered. He cannot unilaterally stop paying maintenance or refuse to comply with the order without it being altered. Therefore, the 2 REVN 213 OF 2010 impugned order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge holding that there was no error in the order, passed by the Magistrate needs no interference. Revision Application is rejected. (R. C. CHAVAN, J.)