IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23748 of 2009 PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH @ PANKAJ KUMAR @ PANKAJ SINGH Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 19.8.2009 Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, the court is not inclined to direct the release of the above named petitioner on bail. Petition is dismissed. It is noted in the rejection order that the case was fixed for framing of charges and hearing of witnesses was to start very quickly. The court expects that it happens so as submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor in the court below and directs that the court below, i.e., Additional Sessions Judge,3rd, Barh, Patna,(S.T.No.777 of 2008) shall grant no unnecessary adjournment to the prosecution and if it feels that the prosecution is unnecessarily dilating the trial then it shall impose appropriate cost against the state. The trial shall be concluded in two years time from the date of the receipt/production of the copy of the present order, else the petitioner shall be free to approach this court with a fresh prayer for bail. B.Kr. ( Dharnidhar Jha, J. )