1.. ,.A, .-1 ^^- <s» IFN, ^£^4'-t:^M IN THECOURT OF HON'BLE HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) 8o3 WRIT PETITION N0 ."^^..../2006 PETITIONER Nanki S/o Dayaram aged about 57 years Presently working as Gangman, P.W.D. Sarangarh, R.O. Village Dansara, Tah. Sarangarh, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) RESPONDENTS ^ ^^ •h. cvs^w -L' ^ .'.»' / VERSUS 1. State of Chhattisgarh through its Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 2. Engineer-in-Chief, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur(C.G.) 3. Superintending Engineer, PublicWorks Department, BilaspurDivision, Distt.Bilaspur(C.G.) -4. Executive Engineer, PublieWorks Department, Dist. Raigarh (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF IVIANDAIVIUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER 'J fio XI-HC-22 sn^i^r k'V'h SSI^V sti^i<^ ^flia 'S^I -^M^^, f<lrS[WW. hffWy S(T^?T IT?^ U.f-^D. 805/^C>0<P -(T^ .200 iiTfifiTai*irai 1q^g' •sn^i'renWHfta 1-3-2006 Shri Sameer Behar, counsel Shri Satish Gupta, Dy. Govt. Application for urgent hearing Heard. +i<iid<i'i-i ~cmsi v, fsret (FatwK ^;3rf;aIi3Tit?( f6r the petitioner. Advocate for the State. lis allowed. The petitioner has filed tltiis petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India on the ground ^hat even after completing 25 years of service, his services have not been regulariz^d. Counsel for the petitioner suqmits that the petitioner is serving as Gangman since more than 25 years. He has fj led copy of Service Book. He submits that the petitioner is entitled to be regulariz^d under the Gangmen's Sen/ice Rules, 1996 Annexure P-2 and Circulars AnneRure P-3 dated''9-4-2003 and Annexure P-4 dated 3-9-2002. It is pointed out t^jat representations as per Annexure P-6 were rnade collectively and the same is p^nding. It is also pojnted out that some persons have beer, regularized. ! Learned State eounsei pointe^l out that the representation submitted by the petitioner is pending and the same vtjiii be considered and decided. Having considered and withcj case, in the opinion ofthis Court, fo( direction is giyen to the petitioner tc( his grievances before the respondej ut expressing any opinion on the merits or the the present, ends of justice wiil be served if s make a detailed representation afresh raising ~it no; 2 - Engineer-iri-Chief along with a copy or the petifion and this order, w|thin three weeks from today, and on such repFesentation being filed, the comFJetent authority ofthe respondents shall decide the same on its own merits in acco(dance with law as early as possible preferably within three months from the date c|f receipt/ produetion of the representation. It is made clear that if any grievance ijemains, the petitioner may avail the remedy, availsble underthe law. With the aforesaid observatiot Cert'i'ied popy s? per rules. i is, this petition stands disposed of. ^w ' Sd/- Fakhruddin Judge [i^^feq 'tSi