IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP(T) No. 5529 of 2008. Decided on: 29th September, 2010. Raj Kumar Bhatia. …Petitioner. -Versus- State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 __________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For respondent No. 1. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General. For respondent No. 2. : Mr. Ajit Saklani, Advocate vice counsel. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral): In sequel to order dated 20th September, 2010, the petitioner’s counsel has been served. Neither the petitioner is present in person nor represented by any counsel. Consequently, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, the same shall be revived as and when appropriate application is moved. (Rajiv Sharma) Judge September 29, 2010. (bhupender) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?