1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD Civil Application No.3521 Of 2009 In Letters Patent Appeal Stamp No.25255 Of 2008 Sudhakar Limbaraj Jagirdar And Others. ... Applicants. Versus Ramdas Bhagwanrao Misken And Others. ... Respondents. -------- Shri. A.V. Kulkarni, Advocate for applicants. Smt. M.A. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri. R.P. Phatke, Additional Government Pleader for respondents Nos.3,4 and 5. -------- CORAM:NARESH H PATIL & SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, JJ. DATE: 23rd NOVEMBER, 2010 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2 2) This is an application for condonation of delay. We have heard the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel Smt. M.A. Kulkarni appearing for respondent No.1 submitted that the delay is not satisfactorily explained and therefore the application be rejected. 3) In the facts and circumstances of the case we find that, the delay has been explained and the delay has to be condoned. 4) The civil application is allowed. Delay stands condoned. Sd/- Sd/- (SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl/ ca.3521.09