Crl. Misc. No. M-10917 of 2011 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-10917 of 2011 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 19.04.2011 Shavinder Singh ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..........Respondents BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Harshit Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. **** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. Crl. Misc. No. 19964 of 2011 Application is allowed as prayed for. Crl. Misc. No. M-10917 of 2011 The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of Shavinder Singh for issuing directions to the respondents to transfer of the investigation of case FIR No. 65 dated 30.3.2006 registered under Section 13-A of the Village Common Lands Act, Police Station Dhuri, District Sangrur to some independent agency or to file final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that inspite of making representation, the aforesaid FIR has not been fairly investigated and no action has been taken on the representation filed by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that vide order dated 11.6.2010 passed by Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhuri matter was ordered to be reinvestigated but inspite of that nothing has been done. Crl. Misc. No. M-10917 of 2011 (O&M) (2) Heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and have also perused the documents available on the file. Earlier also, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing Crl. Misc. no. M-14269 of 2010, which was disposed of vide order dated 14.5.2010 with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation and take necessary steps in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. Admittedly, a cancellation report has been filed in this case but the petitioner inspite of challenging the same has again approached this Court for reinvestigation of the case and for deciding his representation by the police authorities. No ground is made out to interfere in the matter at this stage. The petition being devoid of any merit is hereby dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the cancellation report. April 19, 2011 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE Note:-Whether this case is to be referred to the Reporter .......Yes/No