1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.327 OF 2010 Shri Chandramani D. Tiwari ...Petitioners. v. The Secretary, Smt. Ramdulari B. Tiwari Sanskrutik Kendra and Ors. ...Respondents. Mr. Chandramani D. Tiwari-in-person Petitioner present in Court. CORAM : J.H.Bhatia, J. DATE : 23rd September, 2010 P.C.: 1 Heard the petitioner in person. It appears that in Letter Patent Appeal No.156 of 2003, the present petitioner had filed civil application no.328 of 2006 seeking direction to the respondent to produce certain documents at the time of final hearing of the Letter Patent Appeal. According to the petitioner, documents, which were filed were bogus and, therefore, action for contempt of the Court be taken. Direction for production of documents was for the purpose of use of those documents at the time of hearing of the letter patent appeal. Letter Patent Appeal has been already disposed off by the judgment dated 25th January, 2008. There is nothing to show that the Division Bench while disposing off the Letter Patent Appeal had come 2 to any conclusion that the said documents were bogus nor the Court had given any direction for taking action for the contempt of the Court . If the petitioner had any grievance about genuineness of those documents, it could be taken before the bench hearing the letter patent appeal. Therefore, in my opinion, action for the contempt of the Court can not be taken. 2 Contempt petition stands dismissed. (J.H.BHATIA, J.)