IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 13TH MARCH 2009 / 22ND PHALGUNA 1930 WP(C).No. 8200 of 2009(T) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER : ---------------------- VENKURINJI S.N.D.P. BRANCH NO.286, VENKURINJI P.O., MUKKUTTUTHARA, PIN- 686 510, REP BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.BIMAL K.NATH SRI.S.JAMAL SRI.E.M.SUNIL KUMAR RESPONDENTS : ------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KANJIRAPPILLY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. 4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ERUMELY SOUTH VILLAGE. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT RE-SURVEY ADHALATH, COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM. 6. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13/03/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. --------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 8200 of 2009 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 13th day of March, 2009 JUDGMENT Petitioner’s complaint is that though he owned one Acres of land in Old Sy. No 372/28 of Erumely South Village with Thandaper No. 1750, following the resurvey that was conducted, the land has been entered in the name of one Thankamma and that a new Resurvey number has been assigned. Complaining of this, petitioner submits that they have made various representations, the last of which is Exhibit P11 representation submitted to the 5th respondent. Orders have not been passed and therefore, this writ petition has been filed. Taking into account the aforesaid complaint of the petitioner regarding the pendency of Exhibit P11 before the 5th respondent, I direct that the 5th respondent shall consider Exhibit P11 and pass orders thereon. Before order is passed on Exhibit P11, notice shall be given to the petitioner and to the person, in whose name property is presently entered in the survey and revenue records. Orders shall be passed as expeditiously as W.P.(C) No. 8200 /2009 2 possible and at any rate within three months of production of copy of this judgment. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment before the 5th respondent for compliance. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE scm