W.P. No. 1599 (SS) of 2005 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard Sri Subhash Upadhyay, leaned counsel for the petitioner, ld. Standing counsel for state/ respondent no. 3 to 5 and Smt. Beena Pandey, leaned standing counsel for the state of U.P./respondent nos. 1 & 2. Counsel for the parties have submitted that the controversy raised by means of this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court delivered on 21st January 2004 passed in writ petition no. 7212 (ss)2001 Smt. Parvati Pandey vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors, as such, the present writ petition may also be disposed of on the same terms and observations expressed in the aforesaid judgment. In vies of the aforesaid statement the present writ petition is also disposed of on the same terms and observations made in writ petition no. 7212 (ss)2001 Smt. Parvati Pandey vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors., delivered on 21st January 2004. Sd/- 07.12.2005 NCM: