IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3338 of 2006 DINESH CHANDRA THAKUR Versus THE BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.& ORS. ----------- 3 31.7.2008 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The claim of the petitioner for regularization and conferment of temporary status has been rejected by the respondents vide detailed order contained in annexure-9. After detailed examination of the claim of the petitioner the respondents have categorically stated that the petitioner’s claim is misplaced because his assertion based on the documents of various period of work are found to be forged and fabricated one. This is the primary reason for rejection of the claim of the petitioner. It is very difficult for this Court while exercising power under section 226 of the Constitution of India to get to the bottom of the matter by examining the various documents to be authentic or not. In that view of the matter the present writ application is dismissed. But if the petitioner is so advised he can seek proper declaration after due adjudication from a court of competent jurisdiction regarding authenticating of the documents in question which are said to be forged and fabricated. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)