THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PEITITON No. 5492 OF 2009 Dated 27th November, 2009 Between: Pandiri Ramulamma ………Petitioner And Billana Rajarao and another ………..Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri B. Parameswara Rao The Court made the following ORDER: The petitioner who is the plaintiff in O.S No. 389 of 2007 filed this revision petition against order dated 28-10-2009 in C.M.A No.105 of 2008 on the file of the IV Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam, whereby he set aside order dated 11-02-2008 in I.A No. 918 of 2007 in O.S No. 389 of 2007 granting injunction in favour of the petitioner by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Bheemunipatnam. I have heard Sri Parameswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. Admittedly, the petitioner failed to get the documents on which reliance was placed by her, marked before the trial Court. Therefore, the lower appellate Court held and, in my view rightly, that without marking those documents, the trial Court ought not to have considered the same and granted an order of injunction. Accordingly, the order of the trial Court was set aside by the lower appellate Court and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration. Having carefully considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the record, I do not find any error committed by the lower appellate Court in setting aside the order of injunction and remanding the case to the trial Court for consideration of the injunction application filed by the petitioner afresh, after marking the documents. The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed. The trial Court is directed to dispose of I.A No. 918 of 2007 in O.S No. 389 of 2007 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel to dismissal of the revision petition, CRPMP No. 7501 of 2009, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is also dismissed. C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated: 27th November, 2009 ks