IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.11032 of 2002 Between: G.A.Gajapathirao, S/o. Late Sri Srikhamani, 2nd Floor, H.No. 2-2-1164/21/A, Street No.6, New Nallakunta, Hyderabad - 500 044. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Official Liquidator for High Court of Andhra Pradesh, 3-5-398, kendriya Sadan, 1st Floor, Sultan Bazaar, Koti, Hyderabad - 500 195. 2 The Association of Affective Members of the Housing Corporation of India (Pvt) Ltd (In Liquidation), Rep. by the President, M.V.Puroshottam Rao, Plot No.305, Nandini Complex, Mojamjahi Market, Hyderabad - 195., Rep. by The Official Liquidator for High Court of A.P., 3-5-398, Kendriya Sadan, 1st Floor,Sultan Bazaar, Koti,Hyd., .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an order, direction or a Writ one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 1 and 2 in not registering the plot No.55 in S.No. 791 of Uppal Kalan Village, Hyderabad East Taluq and consequently direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to register the Plot No.55 in S.No. 791 of Uppal kalan Village, Hyderabad East Taluq, Hyderabad District upon payment of balance of Rs.29,486/- as demanded by the Respondents 1 and 2 uner letter dt.25-5-1998 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.SRINIVASA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (ASST SOLICITOR GEN) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.11032 of 2002 ORDER: Petitioner seeks to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not registering Plot No.55 in Sy.No.791 of Uppal Kalan Village, Hyderabad East Taluq as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to register the said Plot upon payment of balance amount. This court while admitting the writ petition on 21-06-2002, directed the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 24-02- 2000 within a period of four weeks. In view of the aforesaid interim order, no orders are required to be passed in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to question the action of the 1st respondent, if the petitioner’s representation, dated 24- 02-2000 has not been considered or rejected. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________ 04-04-2008 Prv ..... REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To 1.2CCs to 2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{KRD}