IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 4558 of 2008 Between: Gaddam Yadagiri S/o. Late Satyanarayana R/o. Near Railway Gate, Khammam, Khammam Dist. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Special Secretary, Revenue (J) Department, Secretariate, Hyderabad. 2 The Govt. of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. of A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 The Commissioner, Survey, Settlement & Land Records, Office of the Chief Commissioner, Land Administration, Govt. of A.P., Nampally, Hyderabad. 4 The Director, Survey Settlemts & Land Records, Survey Bhavasn, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad. 5 The Settlemt Officer & Sub Collector, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District. 6 The Tahsildar, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction, preferable in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 5th respondent fior enquiry for Ryotwarin Settlemt of the Land in old Survey No.26 part, correlates to R.S. NO. 50/5 measuring an extent of 8-20 Hectares situated in Lakshmidevipete Freehold Village, Bhadrachalam Revenue Mandal, Khammam District, By applying the provisions of A.P. Scheduled Areas Ryotwari Settlement Regulation II of 1970, for the purposes envisaged in Section 10 of the said Regulation II of 1970, in the absence of issuance of the required Gazette Notification under Section 6 & 11 of the Regulation II of 1970, on the basis and the strengh of the Executive instructions in the impugned Memo No. 392/J2/79 Revenue ( J ) Department, dated 10-07- 1981 issued by the 1st respondent, as illegal arbitrary , violative of principles of Natural Justicer and against the Articles 13, 14 , 162, 244 read with provisions of V scedule to the Constitution and 300 A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the Memo No.392/J2/79 Revenue ( Department, dated 10-07-1981 issued by the 1st respondent and may pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.PALIVELASATYARAJA BABU Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER: This writ petition has already undergone seven adjournments. When the matter is called for admission hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. ___________________ GODA RAGHURAM,J 3.6.2009. KRB. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 4558 of 2008 Dated: 3.6.2009.