1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6183/2005 Balu Ram versus The State of Rajasthan and ors. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.B.L.Maheshwari, for the petitioner Mr.B.L.Tiwari, for the respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT : 25th February, 2008. JUDGMENT 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. In view of the averments made in the reply and filing of notification dated 24.5.2007 by the learned counsel for the respondents this writ petition has become infructuous. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that said notification superseding earlier notification dtd.22.7.2005 is already 2/2 under challenge in some other writ petitions and therefore, the controversy involving question of law can be decided in that writ petition or in Division Bench Appeal which are pending against the order of the learned Single Judge deciding similar writ petition namely, DBCSA No.838/2006 – Nazir Khan V/s State. 4. In view of this, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. (Dr.VINEET KOTHARI)J. Item No.52 Ss/-