1 124611 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1246 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4535 OF 2006 Surekha Tamayya Swami ...Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Machhindra Patil for the Applicant Mr. S.S. Pakale for Respondent No. 1 Ms. S.S. Bhende, A.G.P., for Respondents No. 2 to 5 CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND R.Y. GANOO, JJ. DATE: 18TH JULY, 2011 P.C.:- Heard the counsel for the parties. 2. This application is opposed by the respondent-Management on the argument that the applicant’s claim can be considered along with other eligible candidates only against the regular vacancy. It is not necessary for us to examine this contention in the present application. 2 124611 3. We dispose of this application, with liberty to the applicant to make representation to the Director of Social Welfare Department, Pune Division, Pune, including for the reliefs claimed in the present application, which will have to be decided by the said Authority on its own merits, in accordance with law. All questions in that behalf are left open. The said Authority shall decide the representation as expeditiously as possible, and in any case, within 10 weeks from the date of receipt thereof. 4. Needless to observe that the said Authority will give opportunity of hearing to all concerned before taking any final decision on the said representation. 5. This application is disposed of accordingly. R.Y. GANOO, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.