IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Notice of Motion No. 2021 of 2004 In Appeal (Lodging) No. 264 of 2004 In Summary Suit No. 282 of 1998 B.G. Rege & Co. .. Appellant V/s. Shri Tejshi Shamji Gala & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. A.P. Rege for the Appellant Mr. Ashwini Kumar for the Respondents CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ. DATED : 07.10.2005. DATED : 07.10.2005. DATED : 07.10.2005. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and the Respondents. By this Notice of motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of delay in filing the above Appeal. Perused the Affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. There is no Affidavit-in-Reply, controverting the same. 2. For the reasons stated in the Affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide, hence Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)