CWP (T) No. 4692 of 2008 13.5.2010 Present: Mr. Rakesh Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.P.M. Negi, Dy. Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.P.P.Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.4. It is the petitioner’s grievance that even though he was appointed by the Panchayat in terms of Resolution dated 11.11.1994 (Annexure A-2), yet ignoring his claim private respondent No.4 was appointed as a Water-Carrier. 2. In this petition no interim order was passed. The private respondent is a widow. She has been working for the last 13 years. The State itself has raised doubt about the genuineness of the Resolution (Annexure A-2) passed by the Panchayat placed on record by the petitioner. The Panchayat is also not a party in these proceedings. 3. For the aforesaid reasons, in equity no relief can be granted to the petitioner. The petition, without any merit, is dismissed. 13th May, 2010 (Sanjay Karol) (C) Judge.