1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8020 OF 2010 Sangita w/o Sambhaji Shewale .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. A.A. Mukhedkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, AGP for the State. Mr. S.T. Shelke, advocate for respondent no. 2. ===== CORAM : R. M. BORDE, J. DATE : 3 rd SEPTEMBER, 2010. PER COURT : 1 Objection raised is in respect of acceptance of nomination paper. It is pointed out that the program of election has reached advanced stage and the votes are to be recorded on 5­9­2010. Considering the advanced stage reached in respect of program of election, no interference is feasible. The petitioner has efficacious alternate remedy available to challenge the election after the process is complete. No interference is called for in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition therefore stands rejected with liberty as stated above. 2 2 Pending civil application, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of. ( R. M. BORDE, J.) dyb/office/wp8020.10.odt