IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital the 8th day of January, 2003 Criminal Misc. Bail Application Number 40 of 2003 Order on the Bail Application CRIMINAL SIDE Atmaram son of Nar Dahi, resident of Matbaria, P.S. Moti Ganj, District Gonda, Uttar Pradesh …………………..Applicant(s) Versus State of Uttaranchal. ……………….. Opposite Party _________________________________________________________________________ Arising out of- Case crime no. 638 of 2002, Under sections 2(3) 2 of U.P. Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Kotwali Hardwar, District Hardwar _________________________________________________________________________ By the Court Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant-accused and the learned A.G.A. The applicant-accused is on bail in all the criminal cases pending against him. There is no previous conviction to the credit of the applicant and considering this fact, there are reasonable grounds to accept at this stage the argument that the applicant has not committed the offence and there is no likelihood of his involving himself in similar activity in future, if released on bail. Considering this aspect, in my opinion it is a fit case for bail. Let the applicant Atmaram son of Nar Dahi, resident of Matbaria, P.S. Moti Ganj, District Gonda, Uttar Pradesh be released on bail in case crime no. 638 of 2002, under sections 2(3) 2 of U.P. Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act,1986, P.S. Kotwali Hardwar, District Hardwar on his filing a personal bond and adequate sureties to the satisfaction of ACJM, Roorkee District Hardwar. 08.01.03/B. (Irshad Hussain, J.)