1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 345 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO 2629 OF 2000 (Shaikh Ejaj Shaikh Yusuf Vs. Varsha Dongre and ors) ________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ________________________________________________________ Heard Mr. Golewar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D.R. Korde, learned A.G.P. for the respondent State. This contempt petition alleges disobedience of the order passed by the learned Division Bench on 19.4.2010 in writ petition No. 2629 of 2010. Learned Division Bench of this Court in the said order, has directed respondent No.3 to decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law on its own merits and within period of eight weeks from that day and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner. Learned A.G.P. on written instructions from respondent No.3 makes a statement that representation of the petitioner is already 2 decided on 8.10.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a grievance that the said order is not communicated to the petitioner. Learned A.G.P., across the bar, has handed over a copy of decision to the counsel for the petitioner. In the above circumstances, statement of learned A.G.P. is accepted and contempt petition is disposed of in view of the said statement. Notice discharged. Respondent No. 3, in due course, shall communicate the said decision to the petitioner. (S. S. SHINDE. J.) Date:12.10.2010. rlj/