AB 3671/2011 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BD AGARWAL Both the bail applications i.e., BA No. 3671/11 and BA No.3672/11, are being dis posed of by this common order since the facts of both the cases are identical. Both the bail applications under Section 438 Cr.P.C. have been filed by the same accused/petitioner, Biswajit Barua, praying for bail, apprehen ding his arrest, in connection with Latasil PS Case No. 231/11 u/s 427/379/34 I PC and Latasil PS Case No. 235/11 u/s 395 IPC Heard Mr. AK Purkayastha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. BB Gogoi, learned Addl. PP, Assam. Also heard Mr. N. Deka, learned counsel appearing for the complainant objecting the prayer for bail. Perused the case diary. The allegation against the petitioner is that he attempted to tr ess pass into the disputed land and also broken the boundary fencing. The case of the petitioner is that the matter is being examined by the civil court. He nce, if there is any violence of the order of the civil court, the action can be taken in the same court. Even otherwise, it is not a fit case where custodial i nterrogation of the accused petitioner is necessary In view of above, the prayer for bail is accepted. The I.O. is d irected to release the petitioner on bail, in the event of his arrest, in connec tion with the aforesaid PS case on furnishing bail bond of ‘ 20,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to his satisfaction. With the aforesaid directions, this bail application stands disp osed of.