HIGH COURT 9F §HHATTI§GARH AT BILA$PU§’ Wm Pehhon ($) No.33“ 0f 3W? Hemlai Gayakwad aged 40 yams Son of Shn Madania! Gayakwad Assistant Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Parasbod, Block, Tahsil & District Rajnandgaon Versus The Stata Govemment of Chhaaisgarh Thtough the Secteiary, Sehooi Education Department D.K.s. Bhavan, Ralpur (C G ) 2. Distmt Education Oflicar, Rajnandgaon Responden$ (Writ Petition under Am‘de 226 of the Constitution of India) 55mm Mb: Mime alwtbe $a§§h K MilihQEi Present : Shn Nay Shnvasmva counsel for the Shn A S Kachhwaha Govt Advooate for the State! respondents ORDER (Passed on 113i July, 2007) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as for the State/respondenw jointly submit mat the fact and question of law involved inthe presentwrit petition aretheeametothatofin Sheo Prasad Verma & others Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisoarh & another (WP. (S) No.62? of 2007. which has been dbposed of vide order dated 01.02.2007. Leamed counsel appearing for the respondents does not controvert the said submission. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the order passed in the case of Sheo Prasad Verma & other: Vs. State Govt. of Chhattisgarh & another (Supra), subject to verificah‘on of the fact as to whether the petitioner has acquired B.Ed Examination Certifmte on his own expenses as per the circulars dated 24.12.1998 and 01.03.1999 and funher whether he has been paid two advance increments or not. No order as to costs. / Sdl- Sat! lndu sh K Agmhw‘ Judge \’ /