IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC. NO.31304 OF 2008 M/S JAISWAL MOTORS PVT. LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT RANIGANJ, BARDHAWAN THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR PRASHANT JAISWAL, SON OF SHRI SURESH KUMAR JAISWAL, RESIDENT OF AMRASOTA SURI ROAD, PUNJABI MORE, RANIGANJ, DISTRICT BARDHAWAN …PETITIONER VERSUS 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SUBHASH KUMAR SINGH, SON OF SHRI PARMANAND SINGH, RESIDENT OF SONPE, POLICE STATION AND DISTRICT JAMUI ……………………………………………………………………..OPPOSITE PARTIES ********* 3 27/06/2011 Heard Counsel for the petitioner and the A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 02.05.2006 passed in Complaint Case No. 1105C of 2004 by which the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamui has taken cognizance for the offences alleged to have been committed under Section 406 & 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. This Court has quashed the order taking cognizance as far as it concerns the accused no. 6, namely, Ms. Zenith Credit Corporation vide order dated 17.08.2007 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 48815 of 2006. On perusing the order aforesaid as well as the complaint petition, it would appear that the case of this petitioner stands on better footing then Ms. Zenith Credit Corporation as it is said that Surjit Singh arranged for Rs. 2,50,000/- in the name of accused Umesh Rout from 2 accused no. 6, M/s Zenith Credit Corporation with the help of accused ns. 5 and 7, namely, Jaiswal Motors and Birednra Singh. This Court has come to the conclusion that no case is made out against M/s Zenith Credit Corporation. In view of the aforesaid allegations and findings of this Court, I find no reason to differ with the order of the learned Single Judge passed in Criminal Misc. No. 48815 of 2006 and accordingly quash the impugned order as far as it concerns the petitioner. This application is accordingly allowed. Anand ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)