@ 1 N THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHI-IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH} M1“ f a/Z/ S B (Service Matteg WRIT PETITION(S\ NO %l\ / 201; , / i Ramdas Rafi}, son of Gudaxi‘Ram h aged about 37 years, Watchman, r Pahadi Korwia Ashram, Modna, Block Shankiar'garh,’ District Sarghja, Chhattisgarh'. PEI TTIONER: versus 1 K/S:‘arte of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tribél We1fare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Chhatfisgarh. 2. %mmissionbt, Tribal Welfare Department, Raipuf, Chhattisgar Rsgondents e h. 3jssista‘nt Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Sarguja,, Chhattlsgarh 4 Collector, Sarguja, DIStnct Sarguja Chhatusgarh ‘ 5. Block EducatlonvOffxcer, Block Shankargarh, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA , mm . WéDMLaawjégt 200 31m:m (Wu) WWW 6911mm mmm thafaahnmtvwwmn $31‘mm $3 : Hon’bie Shri Manindra Mo‘han Shrivastava, .L 23.6.2e11 Shri C.J.K. Rao, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N. Naha Roy, Panei La er for the State, on advance copy. Learned counse! for the petit oner submiis that ihe issue relating to ciaim of contraciUai payment to Cook and other empioyees came up for consideration Before this Court in WP. (S) No 2004/11 and batch of petitions and after examining the claim of the petition rs, this Court had directed consideration of the case in those cases. He submit that the case of the petitioner is covered by the aforesaid order. On the other hand, iearne counsel for the State submits that the representation ofthe petitioner woui be decided after due verihcation. After going through the oder dated 15.4.2011 passed in W.P.(S) No.2004/11‘, it is apparent that the ase of the petitioner is squarely covered by the aforesaid order. Therefore, the p titioner is also entitled to the same direction in the case. Accordingly, it is directed tha if the petitioner makes fresh representation before the concerned authority, clai ing payment of minimum wages appiicable e Chhattisgarh Civil Service (Contract Appointment) Ruies, 2004, the sa e shatl be disposed of in aocordance with iaw, within a period of eight weeksf m the date of submission of representation. ln the event of any adverse order, e petitioner woutd be at liberty to tile writ petition afresh. ' With the aforesaid direction,t e petition is hnally disposed of. h . to a contract employee under h