1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL REVSION APPLICATION NO. 141 OF 2010 Shaikh Nabi s/o Shaikh Abdullah ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents ..... Mr. A.D. Kasliwal, advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.S. Sayyad h/f Mr. Y.S. Pathan, advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. G.R. Sayed, advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. ..... CORAM: S. S. SHINDE, J. DATED: 20TH OCTOBER, 2010 PER COURT:- 1 Counsel appearing for the petitioner brings to the notice of this court that the respondent No.1 has sought adjournment for filing reply on 11.10.2010 and now the matter is fixed on 22.11.2010. The Presiding Officer, Wakf Tribunal is directed to hear the application of the petitioner on 22.11.2010 and should not grant any further adjournment on any count to either of the parties and pass appropriate order on merits on the same day. 2 With the above directions, this Civil Revision Application is disposed of. Interim protection granted on 14.9.2010 is extended till 22.11.2010. 2 Needless to mention that the order of status quo should not be construed as something is granted in favour of the petitioner so as to remove the crops from the suit property. 3 The Presiding Officer, Wakf Tribunal to send report to the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court about disposal of application for interim relief, on or before 30.11.2010. 4 Civil Revision Application is disposed of in the above terms. ( S. S. SHINDE. J.) rlj/