^-f>^^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH CONTEMPT CASE fCIVILyNO. ^ ^—'/2010®Rfll88^ / Teekadutt Mishra, S/o- Shri Prem Nidhi Mishra, Aged about 49 years, Presently working as Driver in the office of Commissioner, Schedule Caste, Schedule Tribe Development, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Campus, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. PETITIONER VERSUS Dr. Lalit Shukla, Aged about-Not known to the Petitioner, S/o- Not know to the Petitioner, (The then Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Raigarh), Presently posted and working as Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. Shri Helram Choufaan, Aged about-Not known to the Petitioner, S/o- Not know to the Petitioner, Presently working as Assistaat Commissioner, Tribal Development-Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. RESPONDENTS CONTEMNORS CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 TO 15 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT FOR INITIATING CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS FOR WILLFUL VIOLATION ^ OFORDERDTD.24^2008 T ^-oc| ^qi^iKrt^ , ^NFT^, ^<vii^y WHC^TWRTc^ sni^r ^S^K ....^.d......^..cy^ fgR^ST' 'STT^T'^T f^ri^'^n^ $^^ich ^rficy Praveen +- >3T?^T'^n^K'Hit^T |SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra IMtohaa Shrivastava, J.1 4.4.2011 Mr. Pawan Shrivastava, o Ms. Tripti Dewangaii, couijisel for the respondents. At the outset leamed cou the respondents. It is submitt^ this Court, the orders have bee| <=t}|^f<n<flTi 'HFI^f ^ 'fe^ iRrt^K ^7 ^rf^rq 3TI^?r bunsel for fhe petitioner. [nsel for the petitioner submitted that fhe order passed by this (pourt has been complied with by id that pursuant to the order of |n issued on 16.8/2010 (Annexure R-l), granting approval for re^i.ilar pay-scale to be paid to tlie petitioner tn respect oftiie perio|d from 1.6.2000 to 31.7.2001 and the arrears of regular pay-scal| petitioner's accounts. Leamed counsel for th<| compliance of the order of tfl passed fhe orders and niade paj ^ has also been deposited in tlie respondents submits that in \ie Court, fhe respondents have ^iiieut of arrears^ as stated above. Taking into consideration |the submissions made by leanied counsel for the parties and the |reply of the inclined to proceed further m tJ^e matter. counsel for the parties and the |reply of the respondents, I am not The rule is fherefore ^ accordingly disposed of. iischarged and the petition is Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge |'T:JT^' -^T^