CR No. 6685 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 6685 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 3.11.2011 Surender Kumar and others ...Petitioners Versus Jawahar Lal ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr.Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioners. **** Jitendra Chauhan, J. (Oral) The present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting the order dated 11.6.2011, passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Narwana, whereby application of the petitioners for setting aside the ex-parte order was dismissed. The precise grievance of the petitioners is that objections filed by them were not heard in the execution petition and the same were deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution. Learned counsel contends that written arguments were filed on 15.2.2003, prior to the order dated 18.10.2003. From the perusal of the order dated 16.2.2011, it appears that the learned trial court has not afforded sufficient opportunity to the petitioners to project their case after restoration of the execution petition. CR No. 6685 of 2011 (O&M) 2 Keeping in view of the above, the present petition is accepted. Order dated 11.6.2011 is set aside and the trial court is directed to give one more effective opportunity to hear the objections filed by the petitioners and decide the same before proceeding further. Keeping in view the fact that sufficiently long time has elapsed and the parties having been litigating, the trial court is directed to expedite the hearing of the execution petition and conclude the same preferably within six months. Disposed of accordingly. 3.11.2011 (JITENDRA CHAUHAN) gsv JUDGE