IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.1527 of 2008 MANSOOR ALAM Versus NAZMA KHTOON @ NAJAMA KHATOON ----------- 2. 26.9.2008 Heard counsel for the petitioner. Admittedly the order impugned has been passed under section 125 Cr.P.C. and is ex parte order. The remedy for the petitioner, therefore, would be under section 126(2) Cr.P.C. The petitioner, therefore, may avail the remedy under section 126(2) Cr.P.C. but that would not mean that till the period such order is modified the petitioner stands absolved from the liability of making payment of the amount of maintenance. Therefore, he must keep on paying both arrear and current amount fixed by the trial court till the same is revised under section 126(2) Cr.P.C. With the aforementioned observation, this application is dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/