1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW PETITION NO. 31 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6344 OF 2007 Prakash S/o Motiram Piratwad .. .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra and others .. .. Respondents Shri S. S. Choudhari, Advocate h/f Shri D. N. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri R. P. Phatake, A.G.P. for the Respondents No. 1 and 3. Shri U. S. Malte, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, AND N. D. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : 18TH MARCH, 2010. ORAL ORDER [PER NARESH H. PATIL, J]: . Heard learned counsel Shri Choudhari and Shri Malte. 02. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this review petition is restricted to the directions issued by the 2 Scrutiny Committee by way of corrigendum to main orders directing lodgment of prosecution against the petitioner. In the submission of the counsel, the petitioner ought to have been noticed by the Committee before passing such order. 03. Against the judgment and order passed by us on 17th June, 2009 in Writ Petition No. 6344/2007, the petitioner had preferred Special Leave Petition Civil bearing No. 25012/2009 to the Apex Court. The Special Leave Petition filed against the judgment and order passed in Writ Petition No. 6344/2007 was dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel submits that the petition was withdrawn with a view to file review petition in this Court. 04. After considering the submissions advanced, we do not find any error apparent or sufficient ground for entertaining this review petition. The review petition is accordingly dismissed. [ N. D. DESHPANDE, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.] bsb/Mar.10