IA A A CHELATTISGAgg a" Jiwn Lal Sahu son of Late Firan‘ta Ram Age 35 years, Resident of Village Riwa, P. S. Mandir Hasoud , District Raipur (C.G.) APPELLANT VERSUS ’l . Lakeshwardeep son of Shri Hatiram , Resident of Bus Stand, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C. G.) . 2. Kanhaiya Lal Rathi , s/o Shri Ram Lal Rathi, R/O Tumgaon Chow, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C. G.) . m: 3. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Divisional Office i, Kutchary ChOWKr Raipur ( C. G. ) REsPONDEyis MEVIORANDKM OF APPEAL UIS 17; OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACTIN Claim in appeal valued at Rs. 5,5o,o§0/_ arising out of award in' M.A. C. T. Case No.3li/2001f'y ii between Jiwan Lal Sahu Vs. Lakeshwar Deep and others passed by Ist Additional MI tor ccident Cla ims Tribunal, Raipur on 02.03.2092/f/ /., :V :‘xa IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDCTURE T BILSPUR ; A HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR (LOK ADALAT) MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO. 497 of 2002 Jeevan Lal Sahu Appellant : Versus Respondents: Lakeshwar Deep & others (Arisinq out of Claim Case No. 34 of 2001) ’\: 09.01 .2007 AppeHant Jeevan Lal Sahu is dead. None for respondents No.1 & 2. Shri JM. Gairola, Divisional Managei', Oriental Insurance Company Limited with Shri A.K. Athaley, counsel for respondent No.3. Legal representatives of the deceased have filed an application along with affidavit for bringing them on record and also tiled an application for condonation of delay and to set aside the abatement. Shri CR Sahu. Advocate is appearing on behalf of the legal representatives. Both the aforesaid applications are not opposed by respondent No.3. Having considered the fact that legal representatives and respondent No.3 are willing to compromise the case without notices afresh to respondents No. 1 & 2, both the applications aretconsidered and allowed. Name of Jeevan Lal Sahu be deleted and legal representatives should be substituted in his place. Smt Santabai, mother and minor children Ku Karuna Sahu, Yogendra Sahu & Teman Sahu are present in person. Smt Santabai filed an application along with affidavit for permission to compromise the matter on behalf of minors. Not opposed. Considered. Allowed. Compromise filed. ln terms of compromise, award is passed as below:- 1) ln addition to compensation already awarded by the Tribunal, respondent No.3 shall pay Rs.20,000l- (Rupees twenty thousand only) to the appellants. @ 2) For disbursement and deposit in FDR, the Tribunal may pass appropriate orders, if required. 3) The amount, if any, kept in deposit with Bank shall be payable under the orders of Tribunal in accordance with law. 4) Appellants shall be entitled to receive interest on the amount so deposited, if any. 5) In View of the above, appeal against respondents No.1 & 2 stands dismissed. 6) Out of the above amount, Rs.200/- (Rupees two hundred only) shall be paid to counsel for the appellants directly by the Insurance Company towards counsel fee. 7) lf the amount awarded is not deposited within a period of one month, the insurance Company shall be liable to pay interest at the rate of 9% per annum thereafter. 8) Copy ofyeawardshatl be given to the parties freegicost. pad ma Sd/— / sw- , aMn Justice VWar Shrivastava Member - Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspur