1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2735 OF 2009 1. Ashok Peraj Bhanushali .. 2. Harish Pemji Bhanushali .. 3. Murji Shamji Bhanushali .. Applicants. Vs. 1.The Inspector of Police, Barshi, 2.State of Maharashtra .. Respondents. Mr.H.S.Venegaonkar i/b Pravina J.Kanani for the applicants. Mrs.S.D.Shinde A.P.P. for the State. Coram: D.B. BHOSALE, J. Dated : 29th June, 2009 P.C. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The applicants are seeking bail in C.R.No.63 of 2009 of Barshi Police Station District Solapur. The crime has been registered against the applicants and ten others for having allegedly committed an offence punishable under sections 380, 457, 411, 212 of IPC. 3. Mr.Venegaonkar, learned counsel for the applicants at the outset submitted that the applicants have not committed the main offence and only allegations against them is that they received stolen property, namely, the mobile phones. 2 Mrs.Shinde, learned A.P.P. does not dispute the submissions of Mr.Venegaonkar and fairly submitted that the applicants did not participate in commission of theft. There are no criminal antecedents at the credit of the applicants. Keeping that in view and having considered overall facts and circumstances of the case I am inclined to enlarge the applicants on bail. Hence the following order: Applicants to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each with one or two sureties to make up the said amount, subject to the condition that the applicants shall report to the concerned police station on first Saturday between 6 pm and 7 pm till conclusion of the trial. While passing this order I shall not be understood to have expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the trial Court shall deal with the case uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. Application is disposed of. (D. B. Bhosale, J.)