IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASPUR fC.G.l W.P. ( S 1 N0. °>oo\ / 2010 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS VERSUS 1. Sahodra Bai aged about 38 years, D/o- Chhatram Yadav, R/o- Village- Chandipara, Tahsil- Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Public Works, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Champa, Division Champa, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3. Sub Division Officer, Public Works Department, Pamgarh, Division Pamgarh, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. '/ '/>^ ^ ll !^fiF) ...'^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Hon. Mr. Justice Pritinker Diwaker) Writ Petition (S) No. 3001 of2010 PETITIONER VERSUS RESPONDENTS Sahodra Bai State of Chhattisgarh and others Shri F.S. Khare counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Smitha Ghai PL for the respondents/State. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA O R D ER (19.11.2010) Counsel for the petitioner submits that case of the petitioner is squarely covered with the decisions of this Court in the matter of Govind and others v, State of Chhattisgarh and others {2007 (2) CGLJ 29}, in the matter of Smt, Puna Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh and others (W.P.S No. 4480/2006) and in the matter of Chait Ram v. State of Chhattisgarh and others (W.P.S. 6390/2009) and therefore, at this stage the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation to respondent No.2. He however prays for a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible taking into consideration all aspects of the case. 2. Looking to the three decisions of this Court referred to above, the State counsel has no objection ifthe petitioner makes a representation to respondent No.2 and the same is decided by it taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to respondent No.2 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. If the representation is made by the petitioner within a period of three weeks, the resporxjent No. 2 is directed to decide the same within a further period oftwo months in the light of threejudgments referred to above^ '/ Sd/- Pritinker Diwakar Judge .iM.iiiSa B^S^S^S^i