IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 6th day of August, 2009 First Bail Application No. 611 of 2009 Criminal Side Ankul Chaudhary S/o Suraj Singh R/o Mohala Bhupsingh P.S. Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar. ……...Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ……….Opposite Party Arising out of Case Crime No. 198 of 2008 Under Sections: 364, 120 B I.P.C. P.S.: Kashipur District: Udham Singh Nagar. _____________________________________________________________________________ Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J Heard Shri Mohd. Azim, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Amit Bhatt, A.G.A. for the State. Applicant-Ankul Chaudhary, who is in jail in connection with case crime No. 198 of 2008, relating to offences punishable under Sections 364, 120 B I.P.C., P.S.: Kashipur, District- Udham Singh Nagar, has sought his release on bail. It is a case of circumstantial evidence. Learned counsel for the applicant pointed out that the First Information Report is delayed by 14 days. It is further submitted that co-accused Sandeep, Harbansh and Manoj, with similar role, have already been enlarged on bail. It is further contended that applicant is not named in the First Information Report. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail. Let the applicant- Ankul Chaudhary, be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur. Dt. 06.08.2009 (Prafulla C. Pant, J.) S