-(1)- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1215 OF 2007 Pradeep Purshottam Thakkar. ..Petitioner. Versus Parag Raghunath Masurkar and 2 Ors. ..Respondents. .. Mr.V.A.Thorat, Sr.Counsel, with Mr.Surel S. Shah, Adv. for the Petitioner. Mr.S.H.Ujjainwala & Uday Kedar, Adv. for Respondent No.3. Mr.V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for Respondent No.2-State. .. CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 09, 2007. DATED : OCTOBER 09, 2007. DATED : OCTOBER 09, 2007. P.C.:- P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the Petition, as it is filed being misconceived, in order to enable the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings in appropriate forum, the petitioner craves leave to withdraw the Petition with the said liberty. The learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 states that the prayer for -(2)- withdrawal is not objected to, but, question of granting liberty does not arise and in that regard raises objection for grant of such liberty. 2. Since the Petition, as it is filed, is misconceived and in those circumstances the Petition is sought to be withdrawn, it would be appropriate to grant liberty asked for and hence, Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with the said liberty. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on any of the points sought to be raised in the matter. [R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]