WWW - “20 311%21m (WE) Shri Goutam Khetrapal, co nsei for the petitioner. Shri Bhaskar Payasi, Pane Lawyerforthe State. Aggrieved by the order o imposition of penalty dated 30’” September, 1999, whereby the petitioner has een compulsoriiy retired from sen/ice by way of punishment, instant petition has een tiled. it is brought to the notice of this Court that petition was flied witho'Lit avaiiing the remedy of statutory ppeai availabie to the petitioner under the sen/ice ruies. Learned counsel for the pe itioner submits that he wants to withdraw the petition with iiberty to avail remed of departmentai appeai provided under the " CiGt Civii Services (Classification, ntroi & Appeal) Rules, 1986. r t Prayer is not opposed by th counsel for the respondents, i Accordingly the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the i i petitioner to avail statutory remedy f departmental appeal available to him under i ‘ the rules Taking into consideration th t against the order of punishment dated 30‘“ September, 1999, this writ petitio was tiled on 11.10.1999, if the petitioner prefers an appeal within a period o 45 days from today, the Appeliate Authority shall decide the same on its own m rits without any objection on the question of limitation. it is expected that the Ap eilate Authority shall take decision on the appeal expeditiously. i / Manindra Mohan ShrivastavarW» 7 Judge i ~74 r Sd/- ‘ l/ Sinha w o mmmga 3W mm#wm amaqamr r SB: Hon’ble Shri Manindra Moh n Shrivastava J. 11.92.2010