IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 17TH MARCH 2008 / 27TH PHALGUNA 1929 RP.No. 292 of 2008(G) --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.33039/2000 Dated 02/09/2002 .................... REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS ------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), PERIYAR VALLEY IRRIGATION PROJECTS, KAKKANADU, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM. BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BASANT BALAJI. RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER ----------------------- OUSEPH PAULOSE, KUTTANAL, KINGINIMATTAM, KOLENCHERRY. BY ADV. SRI.P.V.BABY. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J. ------------------------------- R.P.No.292 of 2008 in O.P.No.33039 of 2000 ------------------------------- Dated this the 17th March, 2008. O R D E R Heard both sides. In this case, the proper procedure ought to have been to quash the order passed by the Special Tahsildar, rejecting the application filed under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, and direct him to re-consider the same. Hence, to that extent, there is an error apparent on the face of the record. So, the review petition is to be allowed and the Original Petition is to be re-heard. Accordingly, the Review Petition is allowed. K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE nj.