IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 4TH JUNE 2010 / 14TH JYAISTHA 1932 WP(C).No. 16631 of 2010(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- T.SHYMA,AGED 47 YEARS, (PERSON UNDER DISABILITY) D/O.KAMALAM - GOPALAN,"SANTHI NIVAS"ARAKKINAR, CALICUT - 673028. BY ADV. SRI.MANJERI S SUNDERRAJ SMT.SUSAN JACOB SMT.K.K.PREETHA SRI.MANJERI SUBIN SUNDER RAJ RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2. THE DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 3. REGIONAL ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, CIVIL STATION,KOZHIKODE. 4. PROJECT CO-ORDINATOR, I.C.D.S.,SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, CIVIL STATION,KOZHIKODE. 5. DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT,CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE. MR.ARAVIND KUMAR BABU, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/06/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ------------------------- W.P.(C.) No.16631 of 2010 (D) --------------------------------- Dated, this the 4th day of June, 2010 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is working as a Supervisor in the Integrated Child Development Scheme, Kozhikkode Urban I, since May, 2007. Ext.P1 certificate shows that the petitioner has 45% permanent disability. By Ext.P3 she has been transferred to Thodannoor. According to the petitioner, her transfer is impermissible in view of the provisions contained in Ext.P4, the guidelines issued by the Government of Kerala. Aggrieved by Ext.P3 order of transfer, she has filed Ext.P5 appeal, which is pending consideration of respondents 1 & 2. In this writ petition the petitioner seeks a direction for consideration of Ext.P5 keeping in abeyance further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P3. 2. Learned Government Pleader confirms the pendency of Ext.P5. 3. Having regard to the above, I feel it is only appropriate that the 2nd respondent should consider Ext.P5. This shall be done WP(C) No.16631/2010 -2- as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within four weeks of production of a copy of this judgment. It is directed that in the meanwhile further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P3 will be kept in abeyance. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 2nd respondent for compliance. This writ petition is disposed of as above. (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE) jg