IN THE HIGH ecum- OF CHHATTIseARH AT BILAspua wm PetitiQiiETé‘ Nomea/zoos M Petitioner /AAznoj Sherma, S/o Moolchand Sharma, aged abouf 36 years, occupm‘ion Agriculturisf (Previous Councilor), R/o STaTion Chowk, Tilda, Disi‘iRaipur (CG) ' Versus /, Respondents 1. Sfafe of Chhai’fisgar‘h, ‘rhr‘ough The Secremry, DeparTmenT of Nagri Pmshashcn and Nikuy, DKS Bhawn, kaipur‘, Disfr'cf-Raipur- (C.G.) 2. Shri C.K. Khetan, Sere‘i’ar‘y, Nagriya Prashasan, DKS Bhawan, Raipur', D Rr 3. Additional Secrefary, Nagriya rashashan and Development Deparimem‘, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Disfrif Raipur (C.G. 4. The Collec’ror, Rpur, Disfrict Raipur (C.G.) l 5. Muicipal Council, Tilda Neora, Through Chief Municipal Officer, u\\ 9J 6‘s', Tilda Neora, Dislricf Raipur' (C.G.) ag \ P Gt i c h istrict aipu (CG) / P kke‘% \ 6. /$ml’. ushpa Jain, W/o Mahendra i Jain, President Municipal Council, Tilda Neora, Districf Raipur (C.G.) x Mdr d 7. ahena Jain, s/o Nof Known, C/o Smt. Pu‘shpa, Jain, Presient Municipal ouncil, Tilda Neora, Disi’rici Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA l ‘ 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER:- As sfafed in The cause fifle: c / c ) / ai gy n > \ «3 Vgx C Shrl A S Kachhawaha ounsel for respondents No 2 85 5 None for other respond ts Heard. At the outset, it is bro lght to the notice of this Court that during pendency of the peti ion, tenure of office of Councillor from Which the petitioner wa removed itself has expired. This position is not di puted by learned counsel for the petitioner. As the order of val does not entail further disqualification in terms of p ovision contained in Section 41 (3) of the C.G. Municipalities t, 1961 so as to disqualify the petitioner for any other purp es, much less under Section 35 (k) of the Act, the decision on the petition is now academic in nature. The petition is therefore finally disposed off. It‘ is, however, of the petitioner is sought to be used against him n any pr ceedings or in the matter of any election to ny public office, he petitioner would be at liberty to reviv he petitn Sd/- made clear that if the remov V Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge ,._ l [titr‘c'fraa Praveen r o c i a e ‘t io. WWW WW @I&1§R % 31Wm SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra ohan Shrivastava J. 13.0 1 .20 1 1 Shri Sunil Sahu, coun‘s 1 for the petitioner. , Shri Satish Gupt , Govt. Advocate for the State/respondents No 1 3 85