1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (CAC) No. 8/2010 in Civil Revision Appln. No. 77/2009 (D) (Puranmal Hiranand Khetwani ..vs.. Harishkumar Fatechand Munot (Jain)) =-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders. Court's or Judges Order =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Mr. J.T.Gilda, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. M.A.Kadu, Advocate for Respondent. C ORAM : Smt.R.P.SondurBaldota, J. DATED : 11th February, 2010. This civil application is filed for extension of time granted to the applicant to vacate the suit premises. Pursuant to the eviction decree, the applicant has to vacate the suit premises on 30th April, 2010. He seeks extension till October, 2010. The application is opposed by the respondent. The eviction decree in the instant proceedings was passed on 21/4/2006. It was confirmed in the appeal on 22/7/2009. The Civil Revision Application against that was dismissed on 16/10/2009 and the Special Leave Petition has been dismissed by the Supreme Court on 02/1/2010. Mr. Gilda, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that this application is more of a mercy petition on behalf of the applicant, who is an elderly person aged 68 years, running business of shoes from the suit premises 2 and requests for extension of at least a couple of months to dispose off the stock lying in the shop premises. The learned counsel for respondent is strongly opposing the application submitting that the applicant has been in knowledge that he will have to vacate the suit premises, since the year 2006 and he ought to made arrangements for the same. He also points out that the applicant has not even filed any undertaking that he would vacate the premises. Mr. Gilda states that the applicant will file necessary undertaking in the Court during the course of the day. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the application for extension of time is rejected. The applicant to file the undertaking that he will vacate the suit premises by 30th April, 2010, during the course of the day. JUDGE. Diwale