IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY TUESDAY, THE 23RD AUGUST 2011 / 1ST BHADRA 1933 Crl.MC.No. 2138 of 2011() CC.697/2010 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, PAYYANNUR .................... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED: 1. T.V.AMU HAJI, S/O.THAIVALAPPIL UMMER, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, KANAKKAN KANDY HOUSE, MATTOOL AMSOM, MATTUL SOUTH P.O., KANNUR. 2. KOTTILAKKARAN ABDULLA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, KANAKKAN KANDY HOUSE, MATTOOL AMSOM, MATTUL SOUTH P.O., KANNUR. 3. K.K.HAROON, S/O.UTHAKKAN KUNHABDULLA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, KANAKKAN KANDY HOUSE, MATTOOL AMSOM, MATTUL SOUTH P.O., KANNUR. 4. BAKKAKARAN ABDURAHIMAN, AGED 46 YEARS, CHAPPAYIN HOUSE, MATTOOL AMSOM, MATTUL SOUTH P.O., KANNUR. 5. B.RASHEED, S/O.MUSTHAFA, AGED 31 YEARS, BEEMAN HOUSE, MATTOOL AMSOM, MATTUL SOUTH P.O., KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA RESPONDENTS/ COMPLAINANT:- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, REP. BY THE ASST.SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAZHAYANGADI POLICE STATION, PAYYANNUR-670 307. 2. A.K.MOOSANKUTTY, S/O.KALANDHAN, AGED 60 YEARS, ANAKKARAN KIZHAKKEPURAYIL HOUSE, MATTOOL AMSOM, MATTUL SOUTH P.O., KANNUR-670 302. ADV. SRI.JAWAHAR JOSE FOR R2 SMT.CISSY MATHEWS FOR R2 SRI. B. JAYASURYA, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/08/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.M.C.NO.2138/2011 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES: ANNEXURE A1 : TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION. ANNEXURE A2 : TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS 118/2010. ANNEXURE A3 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF INJUNCTION IN IA1058/2010 IN OS 118/2010 DATED 24.03.2010. ANNEXURE A4 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.A2.3388/10 ON 26.08.2010 WITH TRANSLATION. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rv B.P. RAY, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No. 2138 of 2011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of August, 2011. O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The petitioners are the accused in C.C.No. 697 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Payyannur for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 447 and 427 r/w Section 149 IPC. I am not inclined to quash the charge. It is open to the petitioners to plead for a discharge in absentia. If such an application is filed enclosing all relevant documents, the learned Magistrate shall pass a reasoned order. This Crl.M.C is disposed of as above. sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE. rv