1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.133 OF 2006 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 37 OF 2006 Manoj Mohan Karnik .. Applicant versus Anupama Manoj Karnik .. Respondent ... Ms.Suvarna Joshi for the applicant. Mr.Nitin Deshpande for the respondent. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATED : 18th October 2006 DATED : 18th October 2006 DATED : 18th October 2006 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The applicant has asked the custody of the child during the vacation. Respondent has no objection 2 for giving custody of the child for part of the period of vacation and states that for part of the vacation the child would be required to complete the homework allotted by the school. Considering this, parties agree that the applicant would be entitled to the custody of the child between 28th October 2006 to 4th November 2006. 3. Accordingly, applicant father is permitted to have the custody of the child between the aforesaid period. The applicant shall collect the child from the respondent - wife from Pune on 28th October 2006 and shall return the child to the custody of the respondent mother on 4th November 2006 by 5.00 p.m. This order would become operative only on the applicant filing an undertaking in the court on or before 20th October 2006 that he would safely return the child in the custody of the respondent mother on 4th November 2006. 4. Civil Application is disposed of. (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J) (D.G. KARNIK, J)