IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.30459 of 2009 PATEL MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 04.09.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody since 29.5.2009 in a Police case under Sections 379 of the Penal Code registered against unknown for snatching a bag from a crowded train. The impugned order of rejection refers to ‘suspicion’ and ‘sufficient evidence’ to deny bail but without even a brief discussion of the nature of suspicion or the evidence. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, abovenamed be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Kiul in G.R.P./Kiul P.S. Case No. 69 of 2008. AKS/ (Navin Sinha, J.)