IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.10628 of 2011 SHARDA DEVI & ORS - Petitioner/s(s) Versus MOST.SHANTI DEVI & ORS - Respondent/s(s) _________ 2. 12.07.2011 The learned counsel Mr. Vaidehi Raman Prasad Singh appearing on behalf of the petitioners at the very outset submitted that since the impugned order dated 26.4.2011 passed by Munsif 4th Chapra in Title Suit No. 187 of 1988/ 169 of 1994 has been passed under Order 47 Rule 4 C.P.C. the order is appealable under the provisions as contained under Order 43 Rule 1 clause (w). Accordingly, the learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to file misc. appeal under the said provisions. The learned counsel submitted that the valuation of the suit is less than 2 lakhs therefore, the appeal will be maintainable before the lower appellate court. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel the writ application is permitted to be withdrawn 2 with liberty to file the appeal, if so advised. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. If any application for condoning the limitation, if any, is filed by the petitioner the same shall be considered according to law. S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)