MP 1 BA1606_11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1606 OF 2011 Dattatraya Jagannath Mane ... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and another ... Respondents Mr. Rahul S. Kate, Advocate for the Applicant. Smt. R.V. Newton, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM : J. H. BHATIA, J. DATE : 23RD NOVEMBER 2011 P. C. : This application is moved by father of the deceased for cancellation of bail granted to the respondent No.2. 2. The prosecution case against the respondent / accused No.2 is that accused No.1 had given contract to accused Nos.2 and 3 to commit murder of one Navnath Mane and accordingly he was killed. Except the confessional statement made by the accused No.1 before the police that he had contracted accused Nos.2 and 3, and that, they had executed the contract, there appears no direct evidence against the respondent / accused No.2. The learned Additional Sessions Judge noted that the Investigating Officer had seized the clothes of respondent / accused No.2 but his clothes did not appear to be stained with blood. Thus, except the confessional statement of accused No.1 against respondent / accused No.2, there is no material. In such circumstances, I do not find any reason to interfere in the order of bail passed by the trial Court. 3. Therefore, the application stands rejected. (J. H. BHATIA, J)