IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R. No.183 of 2010 AKHILESHWAR KUMAR CHAUDHARY @ RAJ KUMAR CHAOUDHARY son of Ram Prasad Chaudhary, resident of of mohalla Moti Chok Randpura (Gandhi Vidyalaya Road, Khagaul), P.O./P.S. Khagaul, District Patna… …Applicant/Petitioner Versus KUMARI NEELAM wife of Akhileshwar Kumar Chaudhary @ Raj Kumar Chaudhary, D/o Sri Ganesh Chaudhary, presently residing at Conpura, Chaudhary Tola, P.S. Phulwari, District Patna… …Opp. Party/Opp. Party For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ Manu, Advocate ----------- 3 26.02.2010 Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the civil revision having been filed against an interim order may not be maintainable in view of the specific bar, as contained in section 19(5) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (hereinafter to be referred to as “Act”) and a decision of the Division Bench to the aforesaid effect in Jagdish Prasad Chouhan v. Bhuneshwar Chouhan and another reported in 2009(4) BBCJ, V-442. However, it is submitted that the bar created by section 19(5) of the Act cannot take away the right of the petitioner to challenge the impugned order by filing a properly constituted writ application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Thus, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the civil revision to avail any other remedy, 2 which would be available to the petitioner under law. In the above view of the matter, the civil revision is dismissed as withdrawn. SC ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)