COCP No.324 of 2009 -: 1 :- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.324 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: September 09, 2009. Jagjiwan Singh ...Petitioner(s) v. Sukhjit Singh Bains & Anr. ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG Present: Shri R.P. Kansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri M.C. Berry, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents. ORDER Rakesh Kumar Garg, J. (Oral): The grievance of the petitioner is that order of his termination was set aside by the Divisional Commissioner, Patiala vide order dated 24.8.2004 and he was ordered to be reinstated into service. Since respondents failed to reinstate him, the petitioner filed CWP No.258 of 2009 and this Court vide order dated 9.1.2009 directed the respondents to permit the petitioner to join subject to decision of the writ petition and in case the order passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Patiala was not set aside by any competent authority and thus the respondents are guilty of committing contempt of this Court. In response to the show cause notice issued by this Court, reply by way of affidavit of Shri Sukhjit Singh, Additional Secretary to the Govt. COCP No.324 of 2009 -: 2 :- of Punjab, Revenue Department has been filed wherein it has been specifically pleaded that CWP No.258 of 2009 was disposed of vide order dated 30.3.2009 giving a direction to the appellate authority to decide the appeal preferred by the respondent. It is further averred that the appeal filed by the respondent-State was finally decided on 4.5.2009 vide Annexure R-1 attached with this affidavit whereby the order dated 24.8.2004 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Patiala was set aside and the petitioner was directed to be dismissed from service. In view of the aforesaid undisputed facts, I am not inclined to proceed further in this matter. Rule discharged. September 9, 2009. [ Rakesh Kumar Garg ] kadyan Judge