1 SB Civil Writ Petition No.914/2009 Dilip Samar. vs. Suresh Gupta. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.914/2009 Dilip Samar. vs. Suresh Gupta. Date : 23.3.2009 HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J. Mr.Sunil Mehta, for the petitioner. - - - - - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner's application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. was dismissed vide order dated 20.9.2008 by the trial court. In fact, the petitioner by application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC want to plead absolutely vague fact which is clear from the application itself wherein the defendant stated that “it has come to the knowledge of the defendant” that the plaintiff has advance loan of lakhs of rupees and, therefore, he is money lender. Virtually, no fact is sought to be brought on record by the defendant and, therefore, the trial court rightly rejected the application of the 2 SB Civil Writ Petition No.914/2009 Dilip Samar. vs. Suresh Gupta. petitioner by the impugned order. In view of the above, this writ petition, having no merits, is hereby dismissed. (PRAKASH TATIA), J. S.Phophaliya