BEFORE THE ST'ATE ADMZNISTRATFyE TRIBUNAL AT RAIPUR CHtiATT I3GARH[' <,7pt^^^^ O.A. No. APPLICAI'iT Samik Rar» s/o Sulthan Ram, aged about 62 years, Retired Teacher, r/o Parvatipur, Post-Bargi.di.h, Distt. Surguja, CoG. VER S U S. NON-APPLICANTS 1. The State of C.G., through Secretary, School Sducation Department, Raipur, C.G. 2. Sainyakt Sanchalak, Kosba LeKha Evam Pension, Bilaspur, C.G. 3. Q.i.strict Educatlon Officer, Ambikapur, Di.stt. Surguja.C.G. APPLICATION UI'IDER SEC'riON 19 OF THS ADMII<[ISl'RATI\)rE TRIBLWALs-AC'r, T9-85. a*s'*p BW 1 ms'i Kl HIGH COURT OE CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR WRTT PETmON (S) ^856^f20Q5 PETITIONER RESPONDENTS SamikRam VERSUS The State ofC.G& Others. APPLICATION UNSER-SECTION 19 OF THE_ADMDsTISTRATIYETRIBUNALS ACT. 1985 SB: Hon'Me ShriSatishK. Aenfliotri.J. w Present: ShriS.K.Tiwari, AdvocateappearingpnbehalfofShri Gautam Bhaduri, Adyocate fortBe petitioner. Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyerforthe State/respondents. ORDERfORAL) (Passed on 07th day of November, 2009) IA.No. 1. This is an application for withdrawal ofthe writ petition, on the grounds statedtherein. Leamed couaselappearingforotKersidehas no objection. It is ordered as prayed for. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Aimit