In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. CR No.2759 of 2011 (O&M) Decided on 05.5.2011. Onkar Singh -- Petitioner vs. Gurdas Singh --Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN Present: Mr.R.K.Bamal,Advocate,for the applicant/petitioner Rakesh Kumar Jain, J, (Oral) CM No.11122-CII of 2011 Allowed as prayed for. C.R.No.2759 of 2011 After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to argue the case on merit. Hence, this revision petition is dismissed. However, he prays for time to vacate the demised premises in order to find alternate accommodation. On this issue, notice of motion. At this stage, Mr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Kunal Mulwani,Advocate, appears on behalf of the caveator and submits that he would not mind if some reasonable time is granted to the petitioner for vacating the demised premises. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and specially that the respondent has agreed for grant of six months' time to vacate the demised premises, the petitioner is allowed to retain C.R.No.2759 of 2011 -2- the possession till 05.11.2011 subject to his filing an undertaking before the learned Rent Controller within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order to vacate the demised premises and also by clearing all the arrears of rent due, if any. The tenant shall also make payment of rent of the ensuing months till he retains possession. It is also made clear that in case of violation of any of the undertakings to be given by him before the Rent Controller in pursuance of this order, he would be liable for contempt under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971. 05.5.2011 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) RR Judge