WPSS No.1268 of 2009 Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J. Mr. Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate for the respondents. The petitioner is questioning the legality of the order dated 28/11/2005 by which the petitioner’s husband was compulsory retired. It has come on record that the petitioner’s husband died on 25th November, 2006 and during the period when he was alive he did not question his compulsory retirement. In my opinion, the petitioner cannot question the order that was passed against her husband. The writ petition is not maintainable. Further, the Court finds that this petition has belatedly been preferred for which no plausible explanation has been given. Consequently, on both counts, the petitioner is not entitled for any relief. The writ petition is dismissed summarily. (Tarun Agarwala, J.) Dated 01.04.2010 Shiv