IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2008 / 18TH POUSHA 1929 WP(C).No. 35886 of 2007(V) -------------------------- PETITIONERS: ---------------- 1. VISWAMBHARAN, S/O. SANKUNNY , AGED 50 YRS. POOPARAMBIL HOUSE, IRUNILAMKODE P.O., MULLOORKARA, THRISSUR DIST. 2. RAGHAVAN,S/O. SANKUNNY POOPARAMBIL HOUSE, IRUNILAMKODE P.O., MULLOORKARA, THRISSUR DIST. BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY FOREST DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, THRISSUR. 3. THE RANGE OFFICER (FOREST) VADACKANCHERRY. 4. DEPUTY RANGE OFFICER (FOREST) POONGODE, THRISSUR DIST. 5. TAHASILDAR TALAPPALLY TALUK, VADAKKANCHERRY, THRISSUR DIST. BY SPL.GOVT. PLEADER SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC, J. =============== W.P.(C) NO. 35886 OF 2007 V ===================== Dated this the 8th day of January, 2008 J U D G M E N T The complaint in this writ petition is that despite the direction in Ext.P7 requiring the respondents to represent to the 2nd respondent and although a representation has been made, that has not been considered and that in the meantime, there is a possibility of eviction in the meanwhile. 2. Learned Government pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents submit that Ext.P9 representation submitted by the petitioners was belated and it was therefore that the same was not considered. Going by the dates of Ext.P7 judgment and Ext.P9 representation, the representation can be seen to be within the time permitted by this court in Ext.P7, although it is stated in Ext.P10 that the representation was belated. 3. Be that as it may, now that a representation has in WPC 35886/07 :2 : fact been received by the respondents, the same shall be considered as directed in Ext.P7 judgment with notice to the petitioners. It is also directed that until the representation is considered and orders communicated, the properties in possession of the petitioners shall not be disturbed by the respondents. Writ petition is disposed of as above. ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE. Rp