li!]"!!!"1'""''1 sssssa HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CR. MISC. PET. No. 100/2007 1. Shoblu-aj Nagn?aoi, age 42 years, s/o Shri K.L.Nagwaai, R/o Ajanta Fumiture, Bajranj Nagar, Aaxaapara, P.S. Aniaaaka, Raipiir, District-Raipur(CG) 2. Motilal Nagwaai, age 42 yeai-s, s/o Shri K.L. Nag'.vaai, R/o Ajaiita Fumiture, Bajranj Nagar, Aainapara, P.S. Aniaiiaka, Raipur, District-Raipur(CG) ^wa 1. State of Chliattisgarh through the S.D.M.(R), Raipur, District-Raipiir(CG) 2. Dr. Ramsahay Mishra, age 61 years, s,/o Siui Sarajll Prasad Mishra, R/o Bajraag Nagar, P.S. Ainanaka, Raipui', District-Raipur(CG) ta Shri J.A.LoIiaiii, counsel for tiie petitioners, Shri Saadeep Yadav, Dy. Goverainent Advocate for the State/respondeut No. 1 on advaiice copy. Heard on adiaission. Challenge is inade to the order dated 15.11.2006, passed by the 9th Additional Sessious Judge(PTC.), Raipur in Climin.al Revision No.212/2006. Tliis revision was filed against tlie order dated 13.6.2006, passed by flie Sub Divisional Magistrate, Raipiir iii a pending proceedmg uncler Section 145 Cr.P.C. The revision filed by the petitioners was disinissed by fhe said Court aad tlie order passed by the Magisti-ate ivas coiifinned. ^- ' Cr.M.P.No.100Q007 ^k^.-.Vf-^-^: A peinsal oftlie order dated 13.6.2006 would show Qiat iii a pendisig proceediiig under Sectioa 145 Cr.P.C., fhe peti'tioners filed aii applicatiou dated 12.6.2006 for dropping me proceedin.gs. The Magisb-ate recorded iii fhe order tliat as aii effect of issuance of tlie stoy order by him. pertaiaing to fhe displited area of fhe suit land, peace aiid ti-aiiquility ia the area has been iiiaiatauied aad if fhe proceediugs would be dropped, tliere would be a situation of law and order, fherefore, he did not drop the proceedings aiicl had called upon fhe parties to produce their evidence on 22.6.2006. It is against ftiis order, the petitioners had filed fhe criiuinal re\dsion, which was dissiissed and ultuaately, .fhey haye corae 'before this Court ia fbis petition. The proceediiigs d'f Section 145 Cr.P.C. are drawn 011 tlie satisfaction of fh.e Magistrate regardiag a dispute existing likely to cause a breach of peace eifiier on a Police report or upon. the ofher iiifoiTaatioii and if such satisfaction is recorded, lie inay proceed with tlie case aad call upon the parties to lead evidence aiicl to decide tbe inatter ia accordance wifh fhe provisions of Section 145 Cr.P.C. The Magistrate has recorded llis satisfactioii regardiiig existence of breacll of peace aiid has caUed upon fhe parties to adduce the evidence aiid had uot dropped the proceediugs on tlie appUcation ot' tlie petitioners agamst bis satisfaction. There is no fflegality ia the oi-ders passed by the 2 Courts below, warraiitiag iaterference by fhis Court ujider Section 482 Cr. P. C. The petitioa is disiuissed at the inotion stage itsetf. However, lookmg to tfie dates of proceediags, it is obsei'ved fhat tlie Magistrate shali try to expedite fhe heariag of tlie proceedings at fhe earliest, so that the luatter iiiay fiiially coiae to aii end. Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge sunUs