IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGSRH AT BIIASPUR M.C.C. N0 '2^ of 2010 !fl ISU IN MISC. APPEAL [C] N0.103/2010 IN CASE OF "AMRIT IAI. BIJNER VS. UPENDEA KOMAR S OTHERS" FOR RECAI.I.ING/CANCEUATION OE- AMAED PASSED BY LOK ADALAT HEID ON 06.3.2010 APPLICANT \ i Kf^-l 0,6 3^<1 "^^ •^" ^-^ . -sy' '...-^ ..^"- "?.: ,The New India assurance company Itd. Through its Divisional Manger The new India Assurance company Itd., Transport Nagar, Korba, District Korba (Chhattisgarh) VERSUS NON-APPLICANTS r 2. 3,. / Amrit Lal Bijner, aged about 39 years S/o Shri Komal Bijner, R/o village Sohagpur, Chowki Urga, District Korba (Chhattisgarh) Upendra Kumar Shahis S/o Radhe Shyam Shahis, R/o Bhaisma, Bus Stand Chowk, Korba, District Korba (Chhattisgarh). Santosh Kumar Yadav, House No. 108, Ward No. 8 Imli Duggu, Sitamani, Korba, District Korba (Chhattisgarh) Puni Bai, aged about 46 years, wd/o Komal Prasad Bijner, R/o Bagbuda, Tahsil & District Korba (Chhattisgarh) ^ / s The applic.ant named above most respectfully begs to submit as under:- T Sf^V V! W\'h W 3fl^I *>li* _. / -^ ^ d'°=i •<ll<11<n<1, ®xi1<Hi|ic, fs|<7ll<H^< .mc.(..^.:....:w'./..'..0... sn^T TT5Ri' (1pf3si^) 03.07.201( partjes insuraftce Shri Sourabh Sharma, Shri A.L. Singroul, counse! MA.C.No.103/2010 was 2010. On the said data ottier either in person or through their| appiicant submits that the li MA.C. No. 198/2010 by another was not aware to the pendency Company according to him since chaiienged fte liabiiity, the Company agreed in M.A.C. No. counse!. Ordinarilv the !nsuran<ts CQmDromise in cases vrfiere tt>e Infei ia&t'ity imposed upon tt by the policy or any other ground coun^el for the c<>unset ctaitis ihri A.L. Singroui, leamed present befora the Lok Adata' in view of the above, the shali now be placed bafore ttie Sd/- ^i^ft?i^ti 'nm?if ^ Jfe1[sf •d^i^R ^aTfrosii^r ap(riteant. non-applicant No.1. before the Lok/>dalat on 06^53- vrere not present before <he Court counsel, Leamed counsei for the Company had already preferred ^>unsei Shri Raj Awasfty, therefore he t>f ttie said appeal by Uie Insurance |the Insurance Company has already for whreh ttie Insurance 1J03Q010 was by inadvertence of fte Company does not enter into a surance Company has chatlenged the tribunat on the ground of breach of to be raised by ths Insurance cjsunsei for Uie non-applteant No.1 who on W-03-2010 dow not oppree ttie oriSer dated 06-03-2010 is recafted. The regutar Bench. Sd/- Member Lok Adalat High Gourt Bilaspur(C.Q.) Member-LokAdalat Hig/h Court of Chhatfe BILASPUR