IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.31112 of 2008 DINESH PASWAN & ORS Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2. 4/8/2008 Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh-2, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Rajeev Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. C. Jawahar, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners have been made accused in a case under Sections 384, 354, 341, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, but chargesheet was submitted under Sections 341, 323, 385, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. From the perusal of the order of ADJ-III, it appears that charges have been framed under Sections 341, 323/34, 387/34 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the entire case is showy and F.I.R. has been lodged due to enmity and litigation which was going on between both the parties. It is submitted that from the First Information Report it is apparent that a case has also been lodged against the Petitioner No. 3 Prakash Paswan, S/o Dinesh Paswan due to the death of mother-in-law of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that aforesaid death was due to accident. He further states that ingredients of Section 387 I.P.C. are not made out against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioner no. 1 Dinesh Paswan is in Jail custody since 8.5.2008 whereas petitioners No. 2 Nirmal Paswan and petitioner No. 3 - 2 - Prakash Paswan are in custody since 15.5.2008. Learned counsel for the State submits that from the First Information Report, it appears that there was a demand of Rs. 15,000/-. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners namely, Dinesh Paswan, Nirmal Paswan and Prakash Paswan are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri S. Chandra, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Naugachia, in connection with Naugachia P.S. Case No. 116 of 2006. S.Ali (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)