HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.8153 of 2010 ORDER: The order of the Competent Authority (Land Acquisition) and Joint Collector, Kadapa, in proceedings dated 26.11.2009, is under challenge in this Writ Petition. Petitioner claims to be the owner of an extent of Ac.1.43 along with its structures in Sy.No.298/3 of Bhumayapalli village of Khajipet Mandal and to have purchased it from one Sri M.Chandra Obula Reddy vide registered sale deed No.214/2006 dated 1.3.2006. His case is that he was also issued pattedar pass book bearing No.415998 with patta No.1765. The 2nd respondent issued notification dated 2.9.2009 seeking to acquire certain immovable properties for the purpose of road widening. Included in the said notification was the land which the petitioner claims to have been purchased by him from Sri M. Chandra Obul Reddy. The notification in column No.6 shows the land in Sy.No.298/3 as ‘government’ and in column No.7 as ‘assessed waste’. The petitioner submitted petition dated 19.11.2009 raising several objections to the acquisition. It is his case that none of the objections were dealt with by the competent authority. Sri A.Srinath, Learned Counsel for the petitioner would draw attention of this court to the petition dated 23.11.2009 whereunder more than 12 objections were raised to the acquisition. Among them is that acquisition of the petitioner’s property would lead to damage of a major portion of the structure and that the open land was neither necessary nor unavoidable as there was both Government land and also private patta land on the other side of the road opposite to his property. Learned counsel would point out that this and other objections have not even been dealt with by the competent authority in the impugned proceedings dated 26.12.2009. I find considerable force in this submission. Learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition would fairly state that the competent authority would reconsider the matter and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner’s objection in accordance with law. As a result, the impugned order dated 26.11.2009 is quashed leaving it open to the competent authority to consider the petitioner’s objections, in the petition dated 23.11.2009, in accordance with law and pass orders afresh thereupon. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. __________ 3-6-2010 asp