IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR -------------------------------------------------------- CIVIL WRIT No. 9551 of 2009 MUKAN SINGH & ORS V/S STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Mr. SAJJAN SINGH, for the appellant / petitioner Date of Order : 9.10.2009 HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J. HON'BLE MRS. MEENA V. GOMBER,J. ORDER ----- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the report being submitted by the Collector is factually incorrect, and is contrary to the guidelines laid down vide Annexure-3. In our view, a look at Annexure-3 shows that it only requires the Collectors to make recommendations/proposals to be submitted to the Government. Thereafter ultimatly decision is to be taken by the State Government. In that view of the matter, if the petitioner feels that the report submitted is not correct then it will be open to the petitioners to make appropriate representation expeditiously to the State Government, and it is expected that before taking any final decision the objections submitted by the petitioner shall be considered objectively, dispassionately and in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. ( MEENA V. GOMBER ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /Sushil/