IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.39408 of 2010 AWADHESH PANDEY SON OF LATE BASUDEO PANDEY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHUSAHA, P.S. SANGRAMPUR, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 03.11.2010 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 67 oif 2007 for the alleged offences registered under section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner who is the father-in-law has not role in the matter, however he has been falsely implicated in the case. It is further submitted that during the trial of the husband of the deceased the informant who happens to be the father had deposed that her daughter was suffering from some illness on account of which was used to fell down and the members of the in-laws family used to got her treated. It is further submitted that having similar allegation the mother and Gotani of the deceased has been allowed bail by this Court as per the order contained in Annexure-5. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State is not in position to refute the above submissions. Considering the facts and circumstances of the - 2 - case, it is directed that let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest and surrender within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 67 of 2007 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)