HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 252 of 2006 (SS) Constable 466 Subodh Kumar s/o Sri Dayanand Tyagi, Kotwali Haridwar District Haridwar ………………Petitioners versus 1. Deputy Inspector General of Police Garhwal Region, Uttaranchal 2. Senior Superiintendent of Police, Haridwar. ………… Respondents Sri Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Standing Counsel for State of Uttaranchal for the respondents. Dated: 1.3.2006 Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Sri Vivek Shukla counsel for the petitioner and Sri Harendra Belwal, Brief Holder for State of Uttaranchal. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 14.1.2006, annexure-1 to the writ petition. According to the petitioner he are permanent residents of Uttar Pradesh. On creation of State of Uttaranchal, options were invited and he opted for Uttar Pradesh. However, vide notification dated 23.6.2003 he was finally allocated to State of Uttaranchal against the option submitted by them. The petitioner has submitted that instead of relieving the petitioner for State of U.P. the respondents transferred him to District Rudraprayag from District Haridwar vide order dated 14.1.2006. During the course of arguments the petitioner has confined his prayer for disposal of his representation. In view of above, liberty is given to the petitioner to file a fresh representation within two weeks after the receipt of the certified copy of this order. The respondents are directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner within six weeks thereafter. The order of transfer shall remain stayed for a period of three months. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Dated: 1.3.2006 Rajesh Tandon, J. *Dhyani