IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 13173 of 1996 Between: 1 Smt. Tarabai W/o. late Nataraj Jain S/o.late Doulatraj Jain,age:31,permanent r/o.H.No.11/91, Nagappastreet,3rd Cross,1st Main,Seshadripuram,Bangalore Karnataka and presently r/at 96, S.B.I.Colony,Bakaram Gandhinagar,Hyderabad 2 Sri Sajjanraj Jain s/o. late Jatanraj Jain S/o.late Doulatraj Jain,age:31,permanent r/o.H.No.11/91, Nagappastreet,3rd Cross,1st Main,Seshadripuram,Bangalore Karnataka and presently r/at 96, S.B.I.Colony,Bakaram Gandhinagar,Hyderabad 3 Sri Prakashraj Jain s/o. late Jatanraj Jain S/o.late Doulatraj Jain,age:31,permanent r/o.H.No.11/91, Nagappastreet,3rd Cross,1st Main,Seshadripuram,Bangalore Karnataka and presently r/at 96, S.B.I.Colony,Bakaram Gandhinagar,Hyderabad 4 Smt. Sunitha D/o. late Jatanraj Jain S/o.late Doulatraj Jain,age:31,permanent r/o.H.No.11/91, Nagappastreet,3rd Cross,1st Main,Seshadripuram,Bangalore Karnataka and presently r/at 96, S.B.I.Colony,Bakaram Gandhinagar,Hyderabad 5 Smt. Chandra D/o. late Jatanraj Jain S/o.late Doulatraj Jain,age:31,permanent r/o.H.No.11/91, Nagappastreet,3rd Cross,1st Main,Seshadripuram,Bangalore Karnataka and presently r/at 96, S.B.I.Colony,Bakaram Gandhinagar,Hyderabad ..... PETITIONERS AND 1 The Collector, Hyderabad Dist. 2 The Mandal Revenue Officer Golconda Mandal Hyderabad Dist. ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:NONE APPEARED Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following : O R D E R: This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in proposing to dispossess the petitioners from the land in Sy.No.102/4/2, Hakimpet (V), Golconda Revenue (M), Hyderabad (D), which was purchased by the petitioners from the original grantee under a Registered Sale Deed, as illegal, arbitrary and consequently declare that the land is not an assigned land but it is a grant under the provisions of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act 1317 Fasli read with the Laoni Rules, 1950.” The proceedings sheet shows that on earlier occasion i.e., on 11-07-2008, the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. The same was restored, at the instance of the petitioners, by order dated 13-10-2008. Even thereafter, the writ petition was adjourned twice, at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Today, both at 10.30 a.m and again at 1.00 p.m, there has been no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed in default. C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J Dated 24th February, 2009 vrn