In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh R. F. A No. 1938 of 1993 (O&M) Date of decision : 10.12.2008 Sham Sarup Chaudhary ..... Appellant vs The State of Haryana ..... Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Roopak Bansal, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Rajesh Bindal J. The landowner is in appeal before this court against the award of the learned court below passed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') seeking enhancement of compensation for the acquired land. Briefly, the facts are that vide Notification dated 20.4.1982, issued under Section 4 of the Act, the land situated in the area of Village Patti Musalmanan Sonipat, was acquired for development of new Urban Estate at Sonipat. The award was announced by the Collector on 7.12.1984. The learned Additional District Judge vide judgment dated 6.2.1992, determined the compensation @ 25/- per square yard. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the claim made by the appellant in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this court in R.F.A. No. 528 of 1990 – Ram Lal (died) through his LRs. vs State of Haryana and another, decided on 20.8.2004, whereby the compensation was enhanced to Rs. 30/- per square yard. Facts stated by the learned counsel for the appellant are not disputed by the learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana. For the detailed reasons recorded in Ram Lal 's case (supra), the present appeal is allowed in the same terms. 10.12.2008 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge