IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 792 of 2000 with CIVIL APPLICATION No 6445 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- NARESHKUMAR RASIKLAL DAVE Versus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR ASHWIN V BHATT for Petitioner Ms MANISHA LAVKUMAR, AGP for Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH Date of decision: 04/04/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT Mr AV Bhatt, learned counsel for the petitioner states that according to the instructions received by him from the petitioner, the petitioner's case is not considered by the respondents on the ground of pendency of the present petition and, therefore, the petitioner would like to make a representation to the respondents in respect of the subject matter of this petition. 2. Ms Manisha Lavkumar, learned AGP appearing for the respondents does not admit the aforesaid statement being made on behalf of the petitioner. 3. In any view of the matter, since the petitioner is ready and willing to make a representation to the respondents, there could be no difficulty in permitting the petitioner to withdraw this petition with a view to approaching the respondents by making a representation as regards the subject matter of this petition. 4. The petition is accordingly permitted to be withdrawn and stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. 5. Since the petition is disposed of as withdrawn, Civil Application No. 6445 of 2000 does not survive and is disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. (M.S. Shah, J.) sundar/-