IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.11773 of 2010 1. BIHAR RAJYA ANGANBARI KARMCHARI UNION THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT KUMAR BINDESHWAR SINGH S/O SRI RAM PRASAD R/O VILL.- GOBINDPUR, P.S.- KHUSRUPUR, DISTT.- PATNA, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT KEDAR BHAWAN, AMARNATH ROAD, ADALATGANJ, DISTT.- PATNA-1 Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT., GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 2. THE DIRECTOR (I.C.D.S.) INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SCHEME, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, OLD SECRETARIATE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA ----------- 2. 9.8.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The grievance in this writ application relates to the age limit fixed by the State Government as one of the conditions of eligibility to apply for appointment to the post of Lady Supervisor, from the post of Anganwari Sewika, and for whom 25 % vacancies are reserved. Learned counsel for the State rightly urged that age requirement of 45 years specified under the Government resolution and the consequent advertisement are policy matters for the employer to decide. The Court holds that age requirements are fixed by the employer keeping in mind its own need and requirements. There is no occasion for this Court to rewrite the advertisement by substituting its own view for that of the employer 2 who is the best judge to decide as to what kind of personnel, at what age and for what purpose it requires them. If the petitioners have represented to the State Government for any relaxation in the maximum age limit of 45 years so fixed, that is a policy matter for the State Government itself to decide. This Court however expects that the representation shall not be frustrated by sheer inaction but would be considered expeditiously preferably before the actual recruitment starts, so that the persons who may have a perceived grievance are made adequately aware and not left in a state of indecisiveness. The application is dismissed. P. Kumar ( Navin Sinha, J.)