( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.810 OF 2006 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.810 OF 2006 CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.810 OF 2006 IN IN IN SUIT NO.890 OF 2006 SUIT NO.890 OF 2006 SUIT NO.890 OF 2006 Satyapal Ramprakash Khanna ...Plaintiff V/s. Vipul Nandkumar Khanna & Anr. ...Defendants Mr.R.S. Tripathi i/b. P.P. Prabhu for the Plaintiff. Mr.G.V. Bhagwat i/b. Divekar & Co. for Defendant Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J. DATED : 4th December, 2008. DATED : 4th December, 2008. DATED : 4th December, 2008. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.: . Mr.R.S. Tripathi for the Plaintiff. Mr.G.V. Bhagwat for both the Defendants. 2. Affidavit-in-rejoinder is filed. Heard learned Advocates on both the sides. The Plaintiff approached the Court with the case in the beginning ( 2 ) that he has a share to the extent of particular percentage. This Chamber Summons is taken out for amendment of the plaint to modify the averments which relate to percentage share held by the Plaintiff. 3. The Counsel for the Defendants contended that there appears to be a variation in the case put up by the Plaintiff and hence the Chamber Summons should not be granted. 4. In my view, the law regarding grant of Chamber Summons is getting developed fairly towards liberality. In my view, if the Plaintiff wants to amend the plaint, he would be bound by whatever amendments he wants to bring on record. Undoubtedly, it will be open for the Defendants to put up their additional written statement, if original written statement is already filed or file a proper written statement to the plaint as it may get amended. The same position would be with reference to the Notice of Motion. Hence the order. "O R D E R" "O R D E R" "O R D E R" "(1). Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). ( 3 ) (2). There shall be no order as to costs. (3). Plaintiff to amend the plaint as well as Notice of Motion No.1251 of 2006 on or before 17th December, 2008. Plaintiffs to serve upon Advocate for the Defendants amended copy of the plaint on or before 9th January, 2009." 5. Suit stands adjourned to 14th January, 2009, for directions alongwith the Notice of Motion No.1251 of 2006. (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.) (R.Y. GANOO, J.)