IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9977 of 2005 Shambhu Prasad, son of Dasarath Prasad, resident of village – Obera, P.S. – Obera, District – Aurangabad …………………. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Secretary, Primary and Adult Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3. The Director, Primary and Adult Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad 5. The District Development Commissioner, Aurangabad 6. The District Superintendent of Education-cum-District Programme Coordinator, Mass Education Programme, Aurangabad 7. The Block Development Officer, Obera, District – Aurangabad ……………….. Respondents ---------------------------------- 02. 09.11.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State are present. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that now there is a forum by way of Panchayat Teachers Appointment Appellate Tribunal, which has jurisdiction to look into the matter which is the subject of the present Writ Application. He seeks liberty to move before the said Appellate Tribunal. Learned counsel for the Sate does not oppose the same. The writ petition is accordingly disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to move before the Panchayat Teachers Appointment Appellate Tribunal with regard to his grievance as raised in the writ petition. If such an application is filed before the Appellate Tribunal within two months from today along with copy of this Order, the Appellate Tribunal shall proceed and dispose of 2 the matter on merits without rejecting the same on the ground of limitation, if any. SKM (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)