cp227.11 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ CONT. PETITION NO. 227 OF 2011 ,In WP/6138/2006 TANAJI BHAURAO MORE VERSUS THE GOVERNMENT OF MAH AND ANR ... Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Mr.Shinde C.K. AGP for Respondent(s): Mr.D.V. Tele. ... CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J. Dated: August 05, 2011 ... Heard. 2 This contempt petition alleges disobedience of the order dated 17th December, 2008 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.6138 of 2006. Para 2 of the said order reads, thus: “2. We have perused the affidavit in reply. Leave is granted to the petitioner to file comprehensive representation to the appropriate cp227.11 2 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ authority. We expect if such representation is filed, at the earliest petitioner would be personally heard and appropriate decision is taken on the representation.” 3 Accordingly, a comprehensive representation was filed by the petitioner before the concerned authority. From perusal of the affidavit-in-reply filed by respondent No.3, it appears that the representation of the petitioner was considered. The petitioner was represented through Advocate and even the petitioner was personally present and the representation of the petitioner has been decided. It is contention of the Counsel for petitioner that the representation is not properly decided and the grievance raised in the representation is not properly addressed by the authorities. 4 If the petitioner is aggrieved by the cp227.11 3 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | _____________________________________________________________ decision of the authorities on the said representation, he is free to take appropriate remedy as available in law. However, since the representation has been decided after hearing the petitioner, nothing further survives in this contempt petition and the same stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) PLK/*