IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.19601 of 2009 Date of Decision: 18.12.2009 Surjit Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab through Director, Department of Rural Development and Panchayat, Punjab, Mohali and others ....Respondents Present: Mr. P.P.S. Tung, Advocate for the petitioners. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners will be satisfied if the representations (Annexures P-1 and P-2) given to respondent Nos.1 and 3 complaining of the conduct of the Sarpanch, Gurwinder Kaur are taken up, considered and then pass orders as per law. The representations have been given on 22.10.2009 and 29.10.2009. 2. The 3rd respondent shall consider the representations (Annexures P1 and P-2) and take appropriate action as per the procedure established by law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 3. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission dispensing with notice to the respondents. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE December 18, 2009 Pankaj*