IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.23810 of 2009 1. HARE RAM YADAV 2. RAM SAGAR YADAV Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 2 17.09.2009 Heard both sides. Petitioners have approached this court seeking anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Section 326 besides other allied sections of Indian Penal Code. On account of fixing of a khunta, both the parties, it appears, fought. There appears to be injury on both sides. There is case and counter case. It is contended that they are in fact gotiyas. Brother of petitioner no. 1 had lodged case against the present informant and others regarding the same occurrence. Learned counsel placed before this court the injuries reports sustained by the informant and other persons in the present case as also the injury(s) sustained by the prosecution side in the case lodged by the brother of petitioner no. 1. With reference to those injury reports, it has been highlighted that they all have been found to be simple in nature. In the background of these facts, this court is persuaded to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. In the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, let petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2 satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Bisfi P.S. case no. 8 of 2009 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure. pkj ( Kishore K. Mandal, J. )