IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.25713 of 2008 1.DINA NATH SAO S/o- Jagdeo Sao 2.PAPPU MIAN S/o- Nanhak Mian Versus STATE OF BIHAR ----------- 3. 10.11.2008 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioners are accused in a case registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 326, 307, 323, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are not the named accused. However, during investigation their names have been added. It is further submitted that these petitioners are co-villagers and have been implicated in this case which fact has also found correct during investigation. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and on perusal of the case diary submits that the witnesses have stated about the complicity of these petitioners. Considering the nature of allegation and - 2 - the materials brought on record during investigation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioners is rejected. Jagdish/- (Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J)